Loading...
1984-06-12 CITY OF MOU~D MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 1954 COUNCIL CHAMBERS Approve Minutes of: May 8, 1954, Regular Meeting May 15, 1984, Special Meeting May 22, 19U4, Regular Meeting May 29, 1984, Board of Review PUBLIC HEARING~ Proposed Vacation of Canary Lane from Woodland Road South to Jennings Road PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amend~n~ to Sectin 23.604.4 of the Mound Zoning Code Consideration of City Dump Truck Bids (to be delivered in January, 19U5) Bids to be handed out at the meeting. Set Date for a Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit for Gas Station/Convenience Store at 5377 Shoreline Blvd. (Suggested Date: July 10, 1984) CASE #84-328: James W. Rafferty, 3005 Brighton Blvd., Lots 2,3,34 & 35, Block 15, Arden Request: Lot Split/Subd. & Lot~Wid~h Variance Refund Request on Conditional Use Permit Application that was Withdrawn just after it was fi±ed. VFW Post #5113, 2544 Commerce Blvd. CASE #8~-3B6~ Gary L. Shaleen, 1687 Eagle Lane, Lots 10 & 11, Block 3, Dreamwood Request: 3 Foot Front Yard Setback Variance CASE .#84-B38: Daryl Geyen, 5201 Piper Road (Al & Alma's) Request: Temporary Sign Permit Pg. 145U-1468 Pg. 1469-1472 Pg. 147~-14U1 Pg. 1482-1483 10. Pg. 14U4-14U9 Pg. 1490-1491 Pg. 1492 Pg. 1493 Pg. 1494-150~ Pg. 1502 Pg. 150~.150Y Pg. 15UU-1509 Proposed Realignment of Lynwood Blvd. Between Commerce Blvd. and Belmont as a 19U5 MSA Project - Discussion Pg. 1510-1514 11. Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present Installation of a Street Light at the Western End of Northern Road 12. Pg. 1515-1517 Page 1455 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Review of Audit Management Letter and Acceptance and Approval of 1983 Financial Stateme~ (Financial was passed out at last meeting. Please bring with you if you have any questions) PERMIT Mound Volunteer Fire Dept. 3.2 Beer Permit for June 16, 1984 RENEWAL OF CLUB LICENSES a. VFW Chamberlain Goudy Post #5113 b. American Legion Post #398 RENEWAL OF SET-UP LICENSE A1 & Alma's Supper Club WINE LICENSE RENEWAL a. A1 & Alma's Supper Club b. House of Moy CIGARETTE & ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES The Light House (formerly Three Points Tavern) Extend to August 15, 1984 Transient Merchant License for Tim Shore - Blue Bell Ice Cream Vending Approve Changing LOGIS Membership from Associate Member to Full Member Refunds of Variance Application Fees approved under Resolution #83-137 and 83-144 Notice from Hennepin County Regarding CSAH 125 Payment of Bills Hennepin County Response to My Letter Regarding Sidewalk Safety Information/Miscellaneous Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. a. Hatching Small Business pg. b. Letter from MWCC Re: Boland Report Pg. c. MWCC Newsletter pg. d. Westonka Chamber Newsletter pg. e. Report on League of Cities Local Government Aid Task Force pg. f. Westonka Seniors, Inc. Newsletter Pg. 1518-1523 1524 1525-1526 1527-1528 1529-153o 1531-1534 1535-1538 1539 154o-1543 1544-1551 1552-1554 155b-1555-A 1556-1560 1561-1566 1 567-1 570 1571-1574 1 575-1 576 1577-1580 1581-1586 Page 1456 g. Met. Council Reviews - May 11, 1984 May 25, 1964 h. LMCD Minutes - April Regular Meeting i. LMCD Boat Survey 1963 j. LMCD Variance Application for Barry Krelotz Variance Approval for A1 & Alma's k. Ehler & Associates Newsletter - June 1. League of Cities Action Alert - Highway Jurisdiction Study Commission Hearings m. News Stories RE: Economic Development Grants Sweeper's Parade n. Memo from City Attorney RE: Town Square o. State Planning Agency Newsletter p. Wastewater Flow Verification Program Report (Please keep this for a special discussion meeting in July) q. June Calendar Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. rg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. Pg. 1~87-1D88 1569-1590 1591-1596 1597-1601 1602-1608 1609-1612 1613-1614 1615-1622 1623 1624 1625-1630 1631-1632 1633 Page 1457 84 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on May 8, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Pinky Charon, Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen and Russ Peterson. Also present were: City Manager Jon Elam, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Clerk Fran Clark, Building Inspector Jan Bertrand and the following interested citizens: Mrs. Moy, Gloria Yule, George Millford, Mr. & Mrs. Dan Martin, Jim Thompson and Boy Scout Troop #569. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance, specifically Boy Scout Troop #569. MINUTES The Minutes of the April 24, 1984, Regular Meeting were presented for consideration. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the April 24, 1984, Regular Meeting as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER ISSUING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE HOUSE OF MOY TO OPERATE A CLASS III RESTAURANT The Mayor explained that this is only a public hearing to allow the. House of Moy to operate as a Class III restaurant in a B-1 District. Mayor Polston opened the public hearing and asked for any input for or against the issuance of the Conditional Uae Permit. There was none. Mayor Polston then closed the public hearing. The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission also held a public hearing on this issue and then voted to recommend approval. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-63 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CLASS III RESTAURANT AT THE HOUSE OF MOY, 5555 SHORELINE BLVD - PID #13-117-24 33 0005 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 85 May 8, 1984 PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER A WINE LICENSE FOR HOUSE O~ MOY The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked for any comments for or against the issuance of a wine license to the House of Moy. There were none. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Charon moved and Jessen seconded a motion to authorize the issuance of a Wine License to the House of Moy, 5555 Shoreline Blvd. The vote was unanimously in favor.' Motion carried. ~U~LIC HEARING: PROGRAM TO CONSIDER AMeNDING.YEAR VIII & YEAR IX CDBG The City Manager explained that the following would reallocate funds as follows: PRESENT REVISED FUNDS BALANCE BALANCE AVAILABLE 712/756 9,344 4,000 5,344 752/757 17 , 420 5 , 000 12,420 252 5,822 -0- 5,822 754 25,000 10,000 15,000 TOTALS 57,585 19,000 38,585 The funds available Would then be transferred to: 755 8,778 38,585 47,363 This will then allow more Low interest commercial rehabilitation loans in the Downtown area. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked for any comments for or against this item. There were none. The Mayor then closed the public hearing. Peterson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #84-64 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A REALLOCATION OF YEAR VIII. IX. AND X CDBG PROGRAM FUNDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING; PROPOSED VACATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, LOTS 2 AND ~ BLOCK 1.,~ RUSTIC PLACE The City Manager explained that the new owners of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Rustic Place, are willing to sign a new easement for a smaller amount of land. The old easement is no longer necessary because storm sewer has been installed in that area. He went on to explain that Lot 1 would also like to have the easement May 8, 1984 vacated and sign a new smaller easement. The Mayor opened the Public Hearing and asked for any comments for or against this vacation. There were none. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The City Attorney pointed out that if Lot 1, Block 1, Rustic Place desires to vacate the easement across their property, we would have to republish the notices because it was not on the original vacation application. He suggested continuing the public hearing until Lot 1 and Lot 4, Block 1, Rustic Place have come in and applied for their vacation. That way the City can get the Engineer to provide the proper easement descriptions and have the easements themselves properly signed and executed and the proper published notice can be done. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded a motion to continue the public hearing on the proposed vacation of utility and drainage easements on the lots in Rustic Place to a date when all the legal requirements are met. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #8~$22[ RAYMOND..~ GLORIA YULE, 5900 .RIDGgWOOD ROAD,..LQT~ 16 & 17, BLOCK 5, THE HIGHLANDS, FRONT YARD VARIANCE The City Manager explained that this request is to replace the deck with an addition 12 feet out and 28 feet across with a full basement and a three season porch above it. Present ordinance would require a corner lot to have two front yard setbacks of 20 feet. The variance needed to Longfellow would be 3.0 feet. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance. Charon moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-65 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 5990 RIDGEWOOD ROAD, PID ~23-117-24 43 0013 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #84-321; GEORGE MILLFORD, .229 LA~GDON LANE, LOTS.6 &.~, BLOCK l, MACK'S ADDITION, FRONT YARD VARIANCE The City Manager explained that the reason for Mr. Millford's request is as follows. The house actually sits about 34 feet off the east leg of the "Y" and 51 feet off the west leg ofthe "Y" and is about 6 (plus or minus) feet to the property line. The road was never improved to make a full width cul-de-sac, only a "Y", but it is still on the plat and thus is creating a hardship on the applicant. The Planning Commission recommended approval 87 May 8, 1 984 of this variance. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-66 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR A 24 FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE, LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 1, MACK'S ADDITION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CITY WIDE RECYCLING P~QGRAM The City Manager explained that several of the Councilmembers expressed an interest in having the city start a recycling program. The City has a chance to hire' an intern, Kathy Kluth from the University of Minnesota, to research a recycling program and report back to the Council. Now the question is does the City do the report first or set up a Committee to study the question and give input on recycling. The Council discussed both options. Charon moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-67 RESOLUTION TO FORM A COMMITTEE FOR STUDYING A RECYCLING PROGRAM FOR MOUND The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager stated he wouId put an ad in the newspaper asking for volunteers for this Recycling Committee. PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR X CDBG FUNDS The City Manager explained that the action taken in Item #4 now requires that we approve the changes in the Year X CDBG Budget. The following are submitted for approval: Neighborhood Park Improvements Downtown Improvement Financing Street Imp.-Special Assessment Grants Small Business Financing Assistance Rental Rehabilitation $16,000 30,000 3,656 22,214 5,000 TOTAL $76,870 Charon moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-68 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REALLOCATION OF YEAR X CDBG FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF SAME TO HENNEPIN COUNTY 88 May 8, 1984 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. STREET LIGHT REQUEST: CENTERVIEW BEACH The City Manager explained that there are 11 dock permit holders on Centerview Beach. Mr. Dan Martin has been able to contact 7 of the 11 and they are requesting 2 street lights be installed along the access road to the parking area with the dock permit holders to pay for the monthly changes. They are requesting this to eliminate the serious problem of theft, vandalism and possible personal injury that they feel now exists. The Staff has recommended approval of the installation of two lights. Polston moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-69 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION OF TWO STREET LIGHTS ALONG THE ACCESS ROAD TO CENTERVIEW BEACH - WITH THE DOCK PERMIT HOLDERS IN THAT AREA TO PAY THE MONTHLY CHARGES The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT The Mayor asked if shy of the citizens present would like to make any comments or suggestions. There were none. STIPULATIOIN FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - CITY OF MOUND VS DONALD R. KEMPF The City Manager explained that this is a suit that was filed 4 or 5 years ago for a violation in the old Zoning Ordinance and not taking out a building permit for improvements that were made at that time. In 1982 the Zoning Ordinance was'changed and the beachhouse became a conforming accessory building. Donald Kempf has agreed to take out a building permit, pay the fees and do what is necessary to get the beachhouse up to code so the Staff is recommending approval of the Stipulation for Dismissal without Prejudice. Peterson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #84-70 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE MANAGER TO SIGN A STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN THE DONALD R. KEMPF CASE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 89 May 8, 1'984 PAYMENT OF BILLS The bills were presented for consideration. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded a motion to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $156,994.32, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL - DONNIE'S ON THE LAKE Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded a motion to approve the renewal of a liquor license for Donnie's on the Lake. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR NEW DUMP TRUCK The City Manager explained that we have a dump truck with over 120,000 miles and it will need to be replaced. In checking, the delivery on these dump trucks is 6 months and over behind the time they are ordered so that by the time we order it will be June and delivery would probably not be until after the 1st of next year. The specifications were presented and the bid opening date is suggested to be June 11, 1984. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded a motion to appFove the bid specifications' for a new dump truck as submitted and authorize the advertisment for bids which are to be opened June 11, 1984, at 10:00 A.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. BOB JOHNSON EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~8q-71 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT WITH BOB JOHNSON The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. THREE POINTS TAVERN (NOW THE' LIGHTHOUSE) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The City Manager reported that only 2 of the 9 items that conditioned his license renewals, for six months or until May 15, 1984, have been completed since November 15, 1983. The Building Inspector wrote to Mr. Rager on March 29, 1984, asking what his plans were as to complying with the conditions. She reported that Mr. Rager thought since he wasn't serving beer anymore and was using the facility strictly for a restaurant, that he did not have to comply. He was informed he still needs a conditional use permit to operate his restaurant in a residential area. The Council discu'ssed the possibility of revoking his licenses which 90 are: May 8, 1984 cigarette, restaurant, games of skill and pool tables. Charon moved and Jessen seconded a motion to refer this item back to the Staff to get together the necessary facts for a due process hearing on Mr. Rager's licenses and contact Mr. Rager to see if he can get the conditions complied with by the next meeting. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COUNTY ROAD 15 STREET LIGHT REPAIR The City Manager explained that only 1 of the 8 old street lights on County Road 15 is working properly. All Star Electric has submitted a proposal to fix these lights at an estimated cost of $4,000. They have already put 9 hours into checking out the lights to determine what is wrong with each one. Councilmember Paulsen asked the City Attorney if we needed two quotations. He responded yes, if at all possible. Councilmember Peterson asked if we could get a quotation which would quote an hourly rate. After discussion the Council asked the City Manager to obtain another quotation and try to get an hourly rate. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Action Alert - League of Minnesota Cities - April 27, 1984 B. SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY MEMO REGARDING MWCC The Council discussed this memo and decided to support the independent management study of the MWCC. Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-72 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING INDEPENDENT MANAGEMENT STUDY OF METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. C. Resignation letter from Nels Schernau. Date June 29, 1984. D. Donation acknowledgement to two people contributiing thru the Park Commission's Gift Catalog. Mrs. Dunn and Mr. & Mrs. Charles Howe. E. LMCD Resolution regarding Landfill Site "M". F. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Preliminary Policy 91 May 8, 1984 Statements. G. Copy of Article, re: H. Handicapped Accessibility. Letter from Bill Husbands regarding workmans compensation policy. I. Memo from the Police Dept. regarding "Slow Children Playing" signs. J. Senior Citizen Newsletter for May. K. Metro Council "Review" newsletter - April 13, 1984. L. Chamber Waves for May. M. Report of Metropolitan Systems Committee, regarding discharge from Maple Plain Sewer Plant. N. Watershed District approval of rip-rapping Emerald Lake. O. Letter from Northco, Ltd. - Thank you for directional signs. P. News Release on Mosquito Control from Hennepin County. Report outlining, and explaining cost formula for LOGIS. R. 1984 LMCD Bulletin on Rules Governing Lake Minnetonka. S. Tonka Corp. - First Quarter Results. T. Notes from LMCD. EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION ~8~-4~ MIKE HILBELINK The City Manager explained that Mr. Hilbelink has requested an extension of Resolution #83-43 because he did not understand that he had to file the lot split. Charon moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-73 RESOLUTION APPROVING EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION ~83-43 FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ORIGINAL ADOPTION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY The City Manager explained that Hennepin County notified us that there are 9 parcels of property which were tax forfeit and need to be dealt with in one of three ways: May 8, 1984 1. Sell to adjoining property owners because they are nonconforming; 2. Sell at public auction because they are conforming; 3. Apply for conveyance for some public purpose. These parcels have all been studyed and recommendations made to the Council in the form of proposed resolutions. Charon moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #84-?4 RESOLUTION RELATING TO TAX FORFEIT LANDS, REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Charon moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-75 RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AND CERTIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Polston moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-76 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE FROM THE STATE OF CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The Council discussed the pedestrian fatality that ocurred in a crosswalk in Downtown Mound last weekend. The Council asked to have the Police Reserves work with the public in developing a program for drivers and pedestrian awareness. Councilmember Charon agreed to be on the Liquor Store Manager Interviewing Committee. The Mayor stated that a citizen had asked him to check on the City putting up a community events billborad somewhere in town. The Council discussed this item and decided it would be too hard to maintain with the limited staff and that maybe Community Services would be interested in doing something like this. May 8, 1984 Charon moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to adjourn at 8:35 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Fran Clark, City Clerk Jon Elam, City Manager East Side Beverage 3,O17.15 Artworks 23.55 Grig9s Beer Abdo,Abdo & Eick 3,975.00 Kool Kube Ice Autocon Industries 495.50 A.J, 0gle Co. Auto Truck Service 312.00 Pepsi Cola Bottling Holly Bostrom 267.17 Pogre~a DJstrJ~utJng Conway Fire & Safety 103.47 Royal Crown Beverage Citywide Services 10.75 Twin City Home Juice Chemlawn Corp. 297.18 Thorpe Distributing Dependable Services 33.00 Jeffrey Andersen Dyna-Med Inc. 85.30 Commissioner of Revenue Jon Elam 48.25 Bill Clark Oil John Ewald 33.00 R. Carlqulst Floyd Security 405.50 Explorer Post 911 Gerry's Plumbing 26.00 Griggs, Cooper General Communications 42.44 HRA Human Resource Consul:tnt 1,050.00 House of Moy William Hudson 35.00 House of MOy Henn Co. Finance 119.14 Ronald Harwood Henn Co. 1,311.20 Johnson Bros Liq Henn Co. Sheriff 244.40 Johnson Paper Hayden Murphy Co. 422.29 Longbridge Resort Island Park Skelly 37.00 Mound Postmaster Long Lake Ford Tractor 1,295.00 Metro Waste Control Lowells 77.76 Metro Waste Control Meyers Mound K Service 42.00 City of Mound Marina Auto Supply 683.90 NAIOP Metro Fone Communications 23.60 Ed Phillips & Sons Munitech, Inc. 7.50 Quality Wine MacQueen Equip 55.42 Register of Deeds Mpls Star & Trib 47.00 State Treasurer Mound Super Valu 55.14 City of St. Paul Navarre Hdwe 70.37 State Treasurer New England Business Serv 71.18 James Thompson Popham Haik 1,926.87 Univ of MN Pitney Bowes Credit 26.00 NORTHERN States Power Pitney Bowes 59.25 R.L. Youngdahl & Assoc Poucher Printing 390.00 Precision Striping 1,393.OO Real One Acquisition 708.05 Bob Ryan Ford 64.49 Suburban Tire 265.48 Spring Park Car Wash 106.00 State Supply Co. 150.OO TOTAL BILLS Francis Salden 26.00 Stevens Well Drilling 1,662.46 Thrifty Snyder Drug 24.44 Thompson Lumber 196.70 Western Tree Service 830.00 Xerox Corp 207.72 Butchs Bar Supply 296.25 City Club Distrib 3,899.30 Coca Cola Bottling 205.50 2,111.75 74.7O 661.22 304.50 46.80 57.90 4,600.60 120.00 4,526.18 775.37 100.00 363.00 920.41 5,000.00 25,OOO.OO 5OO.OO 100.00 2,601.41 305.45 2OO.0O 123.36 29,986.80 420.75 83.95 13.00 1,303.45 1,320.88 3.00 20.00 20.00 15.OO 1,349.80 55.00 3,851.63 35,809.67 156,994.32 May 15, 1984 SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION The City'Council and Planning Commission of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in a special .joint session on May. 15, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 5341Maywood Road, in said City; Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Council- members Pinky Charon, Phyllis,Jessen, Gary Paulsen and Russ Peterson and Planning Commission Chairman Frank Weiland, Commissioners Robert Byrnes, Liz. Jensen, Geoff Michael and Michael Vargo..Commissioners George Kinser, William Meyer. and Thomas Reese were absent. Also present were: City Manager Jon Elam, City Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Planner Kirk Corson'and Secretary Marjorie Stutsman. The Mayor. opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. The. purpose of this meeting is to go over the Preliminary Draft of the'Mound Sign Ordinance (ReviSion dated: May 8, 1984). Commissioner Vargo explained the reason the Planning Commission got into this sign ordinance was that almost every sign in the City was over the 9 square feet of the present ordinance and the Commission was seeing sign variances constantly and there was some feeling we could improve the image of the community through effective control. Commissioner Jensen explained what you have in front of you is the cul- mination'of a lot of time and effort. The Planner and his organization spent a lot of time pulling together bits and pieces of information from other communities' sign ordinances; the Commission has looked at those and had meetings and talked about what we'd like to see or aot like to ~ee in terms of signage for the City---there is a lot of time and effort put into this thing and what we want to look at is "does it do for Mound what we want it to do?, are we going to enforce what's in here or are we going to let it ride?". If we're not going to spend time enforcing what the ordinance says,.then let's not do anything with it, let's just let the prolif- eration of signs continue and go on. Commissioner Michael stated we have to do something, there is no'sign ordinance. Jensen stated she hopes the Commission will spent fewer.of "our" hours talking to peop]e about what they can use to communicate to their consumers. Chairman Weiland commented that the Council knows full well the hours spent on the ordinance draft and gave a special th~nks to the Planner and the sub-comm'ittee for putting it together. The City Manager stated the height of frustration for the Council on the sign issue was when they looked at Orlando Bouti- que signs/they try to modify or work with people on signs and then Mrs. Peugh wanted to put up a variety of directional signs to her home and the Council turned it down; but really felt uncomfortable about that because of the inconsistency and the fact that people consistently .put up what are in essence illegal signs to do this and to do that and the frustration of the Building Official trying to manage an uncontrolled situation. The Mayor commented that something has to be done about signs and that the unfairness of it is that we've treated people 'differently by allowing -- for instance, the Lakewinds signs that have popped up all over town all of a sudden -- the unfairness of it is that we've treated people differently; should be treated the same under the ord!nance. He stated he wanted to say "thank you" for coming up with an ordinance that would treat people the same and he hopes this will be an ordinance that we can live with when it is finalized. City Planner Mark Koegler explained .at the last Planning Commission discussion meeting, they came to the concurrence that this would be the draft and asked where did they go next.' They want to'go to the business community and obviously it has May 15, 1984 to 9o to a public hearing also. Before either of those occurrences, they felt it reasonable to run the draft by the Counc.~l to see if they were comfortable with it and if there were any major inconsistencies, the Councll could send it 6ack. Koegler then reviewed the Preliminary Draft. of the Mound Sign Ordinance, May 8, 1984 Revision. Some of the comments and questions brought up were as follows: Section 3 ..O6 The Mayor asked how to limit it tO hardship and asked that a paragraph be put in'explaining criterta-of hardshi, p] i,e. that economics is not con- sidered a hardship, The Building Offi.cial stated that if this is adopted as part of Chapter 23, Zoning .Ordinance,. the Zoning Ordinance does spell out what the criteria of hardship is. Discussed briefly advantages.'and disadvantages.of .integrating the sign ordinance ..into the Zoning:Ordinance. The City Manager thought it makes sense to integrate it together because you have one perSop admini.strating and overseeing both; when. a business comes in, the fi. rst thihg they look at'is w.hat can they do in the busi- -ness district or the zoning and the second part is what kind of signs I can have in the district and parking available, etc. All present were in favor of integrating the sign ordinance into the Zoning Code. 3.07 Change of business, wording or name of company., etc. is considered an al.teration. Discussed that nonconforming signs should be registered or dated to differentiate between new signage. 3.10 Peterson stated he didn't li.ke to see imprisonment as a penalty. The Council wished to strike the portion after the word "misdemeanor". The Planner mentioned it will be referenced to the Zoning Ordinance. Discussed several definitions. rather than 2.acres. Koegler stated in 4.02(4) area should be.~ acre 5.02 This prohibits'.bill board type off premises advertising signs (except real .estate) and is something for the City Attorney to look at to make sure everything is germane. 5.09 Jessen questioned why people should put phone number on garage sale sign. Discussed that alternative would be some sort of registration of garage sales; but decided it might be too cumbersome. 5.09(6g) Change occurrence to occasion to correspond with verbage in 5.09(6e) Councilmember Jessen left the meeting. 5.09(7) Vargo stated he thinks 32 square foot too large for seasonal signs and that the City being inundated with signs (Commission agreed); thinks 3 by 6 foot sign more appropriate. Paulsen in favor of having signs that meet industry standards and that "seasonal" should be defined. The Council felt 32 square foot signs are acceptable. 5.10 It was felt there was an inconsistency here between portable and seasonal signs. fail'to see difference 6.05(3) Discussed signage for mini~mall and that one.wall sign is permitted for each business with at least 2000 square feet of gross floor area and saw no problem, ~/¢~) May 15, 1984 6.o5(4) 6.o8(1) Weiland thought the Fire Ordinance should be looked at to determine if a sign 5 feet above the roof l. ine was acceptable. This reference should be back to Section 6.05 rather than 6.06. Commissioner Michael demonstrated a changing sign which showed the difference be- tween a flashing sign and a changing si§n. 4.02 These definitions would be integrated into the standard zoning definitions. Peterson asked if there.has been a surVey'made Qf present signs; thinks it would be worthwhile to review the Central Business District signs. Koeg!er stated there should be a photographic record/survey of all existing signage. Peterson stated that.before the public hearing, it would be good to have a slide show of examples of conforming signs, so people can make a judgment; for instance, that sign is appropriate, meet.s guidelines/ordinance, etc. Vargo asked if some money.cou.ld be found to provide design grants to encourage PeoPle to upgrade their signs. The City Manager stated signage is eligible expense. Discussed stressing the positive when presenting draft to business people. Koegler stated this ordinance very average and not overly restrictive. The City Manager thought that the group that'would be affected and that Staff wants to reach, would be the Retail Merchants of Mound .(not the Chamber as that takes in .other areas) and that George Stevens is. the President. After that, it should go back to t'he Commission with any suggestions and ideas; then go to Council for a date to be set'.for a public hearing a.bout in'December. The Mayor thanked theCommission for their wor'k and at 9:10 p.m., the Council got up and left the Council Chambers. May 15, 1984 The Piannlng Commission continued the meetl, ng with a discussion of the Comprehensive Guide Plan Outline Draft after the doint Meeting with the Council. Chairman Weiland opened the discussion at about 9:15'p.m. starting with "Housing". Commissioner Jensen asked if City is required to have certain percentage of low and moderate income housing; Planner Kirk Corson explained that he is'being filled in on the Section 8 kequirements and will get that information together for the Commis- sion. It was felt that Mound has her fair share of lOw and moderate income housing. On Page 9,.Jensen asked relative to "Identify residential areas in need of improve- ment'', how are we going to identifY What needs,improvement and why are we going to do this? Corson stated City never h~s targeted any areas and thought maybe specific areas should be targeted for imprOvement. Discussed briefly. Jensen thought on page l0 under "Policy".that something was missing in paragraph " .... provision of garage .... .". Garages not required. On page ll, under "Imple- mentation of Housing Policies" at end of paragraph, St'rike portion after "..range". Next sentence, change to read,'"Maintain participation in .... ". Bottom of page 11 and top of page 12, Jensen doesn't want lots to be able to be divided up. Discussed and agreed to'change statement to read, "....standards that accommodate small lot construction." Corson reviewed the Section, Transportation, starting with Maps T-l, followed by the definitions, the inventory of local roads, what. they are and how they are classified. On page 5, the Commission thought there should be 4 zones (Island Park should be in- cluded. On page 6, Jensen questioned if numbers correct; didn't seem consistent. Vargo stated he had a problem with the statistics, too. Corson reviewed bikeways. Vargo.fee.ls we need to include biketrails to our schools and thinks we should try to accomplish a goal of working with the Community of Minne- trista to connect the bikeway to the high school. Discussed pedestrian crosswalks; there are at least two places on Commerce with no signage. The Urban Environmental Protection Section is pretty well drawn out; pretty basic. The Chairman asked if anyone had anything to' change. There were some typo's to be corrected, but it was agreed to accept the content of this section with the exception of on page 4, 1,000 feet from the shorelines of designated lakes doesn't apply as Mound was established before at 50 feet. Corson would like to bring back "Housing Section" one more time because of the changes. It was asked if.the statistics could be checked. Also discussed that Corson will be done about the end of June. At 9:55 p.m., densen moved and Michael seconded a motion to adjourn this discussion. All in favor, so meeting adjourned. May 22, 1984 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on May 22, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Pinky Charon, Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen and Russ PeterSo~. Also present were: City Manager Jon Elam, City Attorney Curt Pearson, Building Inspector Jan Bertrand, Water & Sewer Superintendent Greg Skinner, Street Superintendent Eugene Hoff.and Acting City Clerk Marjorie Stutsman and the following interested citizens: . Larry Con- nolly, Nicholas Espirltu, John and Joyce Kossieck, Brad Patterson and Richard Johnson, Jr. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. Themlnutes of the May 8 and May 15 meetings are to be carried over until the June 12, 1984 regular meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS FOR MAY Mayor Polston opened the pub'lic hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak in regard to a delinquent utility bill. No one responded. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Peterson moved and Jessen seconded the fC.11owing resolution: RESOLUTION 84-77 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF THE REVISED TOTAL $2,020.42 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO.SHUT-OFF WATER.SERVICE FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION: 'VACATION OK'UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON LOTS l, 2, 3 & 4, BLOCK l, RUSTIC PLACE The City Manager explained this was talked about at the last meeting and because the material you had in the last packet was not the final material that had been developed, it was tabled. The Building Official wrote out the resolution which covered the issue and the hearing not'ice was correctly published for all 4 lots as you will notice in this packet, even tho the application was for Lots 2, 3 & 4. The owner of Lot 1 didn't file for a vacation of easement on Lot 1, but be- cause the hearing notice was prepared as if he had, the whole situation is cleared up. The City Manager asked the City Attorney if resolution would be correct. He concurred that it was, but that it could not be recorded until the new easements were executed and recorded. The Mayor then reopened public hearing and asked if anyone would like to speak;. hearing none, the public hearing was closed. Charon moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 84-78 RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMEN] ON LOTS 1., 2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, RUSTIC PLACE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. May 22, 1984 The City Manager then explained that because we owned these lots and the people brought, them without seeing the easements before .the closing, and it was their intention to build back on the lots away from the street, Mr. Thompson is re- questing the fee for the vacation be waived and refunded to them. Secondly, John Cameron of McCombs Knutson cannot understand why the easements were set at 55 feet requiring homes to be built close to Bartlett Boulevard. No where else does the City have a 55 foot wide easement for utilities. Because of the hard~ ship to the applicant, we would recommend the refund. Peterson moved and Jessen seconded a motion that the fee be refunded for the vacation application on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Rustic Place. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #84-324 NICHOLAS ESPIRITU, 1638-EAGLE LANE, LOTS 13, 14 & 15, BLOCK 2, WOODLAND POINT, FRONT YARD VARIANCE The City Manager explained the request is for a 24 foot front yard variance be- cause the applicant wants to build a 2 car garage and alongside his property is an undeveloped street and he wants to build up to 6 feet of that street. The Building Official has recommended allowing the garage to be built to within 10 feet allowing a 20 foot variance. The o~her language talked about at the Plan- ning Commission was that the. building would be used for storage of private passenger vehicles and not be used for any kine of home occupation. Applicant is in the Body Shop business. Mr. Espiritu stated he does work a lot on his own vehicles. Charon moved and Peterson seconded .the followin~ ~esolution: RESOLUTION 84- 79 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDATION TO APPROVEiA 20 FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE FOR LOTS 13, 14 & 15, BLOCK 11, wOODLAND POINT, PID #'S 13-117-24 12 Oi94.AND 13-I17-24 12 O195 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #84-326. JOHN AND JOYCE KOSSlECK, 4760 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOT 5 & W. 18 FEET OF LOT 4, BLOCK 8, DEVON, 6 FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE The City Manager explained that the property is on Island View Drive and requires a 6 foot front yard variance basically because of the topography and the way it's landscaped. Applicant just purchase property and they want to convert the existing carport to an enclosed garage. There will be'no expansion toward street or the side. The Planning Commission has recommended this. Jessen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 84- 80 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A (6) FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE FOR LOT 5 & WEST 18 FEET OF LOT 4, BLOCK 8, DEVON PID #30-117-23 22 0084 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. May 22, 1984 CASE # 84-327 WESTONKA AUTO BODY, 4839 SHORELINE BOULEVARD, LOTS 5, 18, 19 & PART OF LOTS 15, 16 & 17, BLOCK l, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT A, SIGN PERMIT The City Manager explained the applicant, Brad Patterson, is requesting to put a new sign on the front of his building that would be in conformance in size with the Photo Factory. A second sign (temporary. sign 4 X 8 feet) is proposed to be put at the driveway on the Bartlett Boulevard side for 60 days. The temporary sign raises some question as it doesn't meet the language of a seasonal sign of the proposed sign draft. The Planning CommiSsion took separate action on each of the signs, approving the sign on front of building and denying the other. Jessen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 84-81 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANN'ING COMMISSION RECOM- MENDATION TO APPROVE THE SIGN VARIANCE FOR BRAD PATTER- SON, WESTONKA AUTO BODY, FOR THE SHORELINE SIGN AT 4839 SHORELINE BOULEVARD PID # 13-117-24 44 0015 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The applicant asked to be allowed to put a permanent sign on the fence on the back side of business (Bartlett'Boulevard). The Building Official stated a free standing 4 X 8 foot sign would be allowable with a 15 foot setback from the right-of-way, but not a sign mounted on the fence; Discussed Klacement of sign. Peterson moved and J~ssen seconded a motion to refer the request back to the Planning Commission with no further fee; The vote was unanimously, in favor. Motion carried. CASE #84-330 SKIP AND MYRT BLANK (SKIP'S OUTLET), 2341 COMMERCE BOULEVARD METES'& BOUNDS DESCRIPTION, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 167, SIGN PERMIT The City Manager explained the applicant asked to have this tabled. He will be moving into the former Rustique building and open June 1st. Dick Schwert is going to move into'the former Westonka Sports and he sees real possibilities since he has to update that building and perhaps.do a whole new store front; he has talked to Skip and asked him to hold off on his signage. Schwert has hired Architect Jim Horan and wants to coordinate the fronts, take off lights, put in new doors. Schwert will be on left, Skip Blank on right and another business downstairs. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED VACATION OF CANARY LANE FROM WOODLAND ROAD SOUTH TO JENNINGS ROAD The City Manager explained that the suggested date for the above public hearing is June 12, 1984. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded a motion to set June 12, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider the proposed vacation of a certain street easement of Canary Lane from Woodland Road South to Jennings Road. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. May 22, 1984 SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ZONING ~ODE - SECTION 23.604.4 The City Manager explained that we need a public hearing to.allow swimming pools a's a permitted use in the residential districts and that the suggested date for the public hearing is June 12, 1984. Peterson moved and CharOn seconded a motion to set'June 12, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to.consider the proposed amendment to' Section 23.604.4 of the Mound Zoning Code Ordinances relative to swimming pools in residential.districts. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT The Mayqr asked if there were any comments or suggestions from the citizens present. There were none. REQUEST TO AMEND CITY CODE BY APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF A STOP SiGN AT THE. CORNER OF DEERWOOD DRIVE AND'HALSTEAD'LANE The City Manager explained that a~sign is needed as when you drive up to the corner because of the terrain, yoU'have to get well out into the intersection to see. It was discussed that signs be.put at both ends of' Deerwood. The City Attorney stated we can do stop signs by resolution. Charon moved and Jessen seconded'the following resolution: RESOLUTION 84-82 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF A STOP SIGN AT BOTH ENDS OF DEERWOOD DRIVE. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF THE PARADE PERMIT'FOR'BLUE'WATER DAZE FESTIVAL - JUNE 9, 1984 The City Manager explained several permits have been requested for the "Blue Water Daze" activities and also the use of Mound Bay Park, the Depot Building and that any fees be waiver. The Mound Retail Council is sponsoring this event; insurance is through the Vestonka Chamber of Commerce. Peterson moved and Polston seconded a motion to approve the parade permit for Saturday,.June.gth~ 1984 as requested. The vote was un- animously in favor..M.o~ion carried. Charon moved and Jessen seconded a motion approving the use of Mound Bay Park and the Depot Building for "Blue Water Daze" activities and waiving any fees for the.dates of June 8, 9 and 10, 1984. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT'S LICENSE'FOR MOUND RETAIL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION JUNE 8, 9 AND 10, 1984 This request is to sell food items, non-alcoholic beverages during the ~'Blue Water Daze" activities with the permit fees waived. Peterson moved and Charon seconded a motion approving a Transient Merchant's License as requested for the sale of food items and non- alcoholic beverages'June 8, 9 & 10, 1984 during Btue Water Daze Festival waiving the fees. in favor. Motion carried. May 22, 1~84 The vote on the motion was unanimously REQUEST Of THE MINNETONKA BASS CLUB TO HOLD ANNUAL' FISHING CONTEST AT MOUND BAY PARK JUNE 9, 1984 FROM 5:30 A..M. to 2:30 P.M. The City Manager explained that this fishing contest has been an annual event and that because of the hours 5:30 A.M. to 2:30 P.M..should not be a confllct with the parade which will be starting 'at about 2 P.M. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded a motion approving the request of the Minnetonka~'Bass Club to hold their annual fish!ng contest at Mound Bay Park on June'9, 1984 from 5:30 A;M.'to 2:30 P.M. The vote.was unan'imously in favor. Motion carried. REPORTS: WATER & SEWER'QUARTERLY REPORT'AND LIQUOR STORE REPORT The City Manager reported on the water-and sewer and that basically they are pretty close on line.' The liquor is down; operates as well as most private stores. No action is needed. ENTER INTO A LEND/LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE'STATE'OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FOR THE USE OF THE NEW'INTOXILIZER 5000 UNIT The City Manager explained the State has authorized entering into an agreement to lend/lease the City the new "lntoxilizer 5000 Unit" to replace the old Smith and Wesson 900-A breathalyzers and are asking t¥ City to adopt a resolution. Charon moved .and'.Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 84-83 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH'THE STATE.OF MINNESOTA FOR THE LOAN OF INTOXILYZER 5000 EVIDENTIAL BREATH ALCOHOL TEST INSTRUMENTS. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVAL.OF AGREEMENT TO ALLOW DOW'SAT OF MINNESOTA, INC. TO INSTALL AND USE ANTENNA ON THE WATER TOWER ON FAIRVIEW-LANE AT A LEASE RATE OF $15. A MONTH The City Manager explained that because.of Dow-Sates continual problems with electrical interference, they had requested to try attaching antenna to our water tower; reception was so much better, that they wanted to leave it. It's a short antenna that can hardly be seen and it will replace the 40 foot ex- tension they planned on their existing tower. They have provided an insurance certificate. Charon moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 84-8~ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING ENTERING INTO AN AGREEMENT TO ALLOW DOW-SAT OF MINNESOTA, 'INC. TO INSTALL AND USE ANTENNA ON THE WATER TOWER ON FAIRVIEW LANE AT A LEASE RATE OF $15. PER MONTH. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. May 22, 1984 REQUEST TO APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOME AT 1709 CANARY LANE WHILE THE RESIDENTS REMAIN IN THE EXISTING HOUSE The City Manager explained that the Richard L. Johnson, jr.l$ are requesting to build a new home on the same lot their present'home is on and then .removing the old house after moving into the new one. Problem is City Ordinance doesn't allow 2 houses on the same .lot. Appli'cant is willing to submit a letter of credit in lieu of a bond of .$1,O00'.to insure the removal Of the old house. New house would conform to.code. The City Attorney stated City would also need a written agreement giving the City the right to go onto the property to remove the house. Peterson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 84-85 RESOLUTION TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOUSE WITH .THE CONDITION THAT THE OLD HOUSE AT 1709 CANARY LANE BE REMOVED WITHIN 9'MONTHS OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE NEW HOUSE PROVIDED WE GET AN AGREEMENT TO ALLOW US ACCESS TO REMOVE THE OLD HOUSE AND A LETTER OF CREDIT OR PERFORMANCE BOND FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE OLD HOUSE. After further discussion, Peterson moved and Charon seconded the following amend- ment: RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE ABOVE RE~OLUTION TO INCLUDE THAT THE EXISTING GARAGE BE REMOVED WItH TWO (2) YEARS FROM T~E DATE OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE NEW HOME. The vote on the amendment was unanimously in favor. The vote on the resolution as amended was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. No~e: The City Attorney will draw.the agreement as a reco~d~ble document and will have it filed.after its been signed and completed. QUOTATIONS FOR A NEW PICK-UP TRUCK FOR PARK DEPARTMENT USE (BUDGETED IN THE 1984 CAPITAL BUDGET OUTLAY) The City Manager explained that the Park. Director has been looking at pickups for a long time. Quote from Thurk Bros. at St. Bonifacius was $7,300 and from Village Chevrolet at Wayzata was $7,651. There was a question on comparable equipment and descriptions. It was decided one .item offset another on the quotes. Polston moved and Peterson seconded a motion to authorize accepting the lower quotation of Thurk Bros.. Chevrolet Company in the amount of $7300. to purchase the Pickup Truck for the Park Department. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. QUOTATION FOR A NEW TANKER TRUCK (BUDGETED IN THE 1984 BUDGET FROM THE STREETS AND SEWER FUND) The City Manager explained that there has been a conflict between the Street and Sewer Departments for the use of the tanker and really need two units. Two quotations have been obtained which are as follows: Engle Fabri. cation, Inc. Applied Concepts, Inc. $13,748. 14,798. May 22, 1984 Both quotations include a new 2500 gallon stainless steel tank, used cab and chassis with tank to be painted and mounted on chassis. The Water and Sewer Superintendent explained that they wil!~ be installing plumbing for the tank and.that will make the total cost approx... $14,148. They are in the process of getting a quotation to replace pump on the 1,OOO gallon tank unit, also. The 2500 gallon tank. with its significantly larger capacity, r. aises the efficiency of their operations, but their goal is to have two operational trucks for approxi'mately thi's price. The City Manager stated that they propose to sell a tail gate paver for $5,000.; $5,OOO~was budgeted for this purpose.and the balance w~ll come.from the Sewer Fund. Peterson moved an'd Charon.seconded a motion authorizing acceptlng the low quotation.of.'Engl~e Fabrication for the purchase of the.2500 gallon-stainless steel tank, used cab and chassis with tank being. painted and mounted on chassis - total' cost to be $14,148.' The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried ADOPTION OF L~M~'C.D~ CODE'BY REFERENCE'(DISCUSSION ITEM) The City Manager explained that a gentleman with.a.property on Enchanted Road installed 6 do~ks in front of the 1OO fOot property which violates the L.M.C.D. Code and is a flagrant use of dockage and of the neighbors. He stated that if we were to adopt the L.M.C.D. Code by reference, we could have some ability to prosecute some of these violations. Presently the E.M.C.D. does not prosecute private lakeshore dock owners; only commercial dock use. The C!ty Attorney asked to have material referred to him so he could research the matter. PAYMENT OF B!LLS The bills were presented for consideration. Peterson moved and Charon seconded a motion to a~prove the payment of bills as presented, on the pre-list in the amount of $96,495.18, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/~ISCELLANEOUS A. Planning Commission Minutes of May 14, 1984. B. Agenda - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District C. AMM Legislative Bulletin D. Notes from League of Minnesota Cities E. Metropolitan Council Review F. LMCD Press Release G.. Minnesota Safety Council Note H. City of Orono Letter Notes from Hennepin County Department of Transportation in regard to Black Lake Bridge Me Metropolitan Council Announcement Re: Memorandum on Industrial Revenue Bonds May 22, 1984 Regional Transit Board American Legion Post 398 Gambling Report; also noted was that the American Legion 9ave the City $300 for flags for Memorial Day. Minnetonka Newsletter Twin Cities Labor Market Information Charon moved and Peterson seconded a motion to adjourn at 9:15 P'.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jon Elam, City Manager Marjorie Stutsman, Acting City Clerk BILLS ....... M~Y 22, 1984 Allstar Electric 2~.8'~ Abdo, Abdo & Eick 1,649.52 Air Pneutroni¢ Co 14.40 Anchor Paper 326.34 Holly Bostrom 150.00 Jan Bertrand 16.39 Borchert Ingersoll 90.77 Burlington Northern 533.33 Blackowiak & Son 56.00 Bryan Rock Products 78.38 Contel 1,410.90 Conway Fire & Safety 27.82 Consolidated Micrograhpics 53.96 Copy Duplicating Prod 15.OO Coast to Coast 86.24 John Ewald 3.65 Jon Elam 8.25 First Bank Mpls 4.00 Flexible Pipe Tool 80.00 Genuine Parts 76.07 Glenwood Inglewood 48.90 General Communications 1,900.OO Heiman Fire Equip 1,113.40 Wm Hudson 3.45 Eugene Hickok & Assoc 1,019.741 Instrumentation Services 141.18 Thomas Jacobs 63.75 Kool Kube Ice 72.00 Lyman Lumber 42.47 LOGIS '~ 2,287.53 The Laker 247.30 MN Dept of Public Safety 40.00 City of Minnetrista 50.00 Martins Navarre 66 55.00 Mpls Oxygen Co. 21.O0 Mpls Star & Trib 61.10 McCombs Knutson 3,734.00 Minnegasco 1,158.O6 N.C.E. 109.37 NW Bell Telephone 270.05 N.S.P. 4,795.93 Popham, Haik Schnobrich 2,116.05 Barry Palm 16.45 Brad Roy 116.93 Nels Schernau 7.59 Specialty Screening 202.50 Stevens Well Drilling 502.20 Sterne Electric 588.39 Tri State Pump 9,903.00 Village Chevrolet 63.00 Van Doren, Hazard, Stallings 569.50 Wurst, Pearson,Hamilton Water Products Unitog Xerox Donald Bryce Ron Burns--dock refund Fran Clark Robert Cheney Director Property Tax Joe Gibson Griggs Cooper Johnson Bros. Liq. Robert Johnson David Kurvers dock refund Roger Keil " MN Green Industry Expo 84 MN Rec' &~Park City of Mound Mound Fire Dept Ed Phillips Quality Wine P.D.Q. gasoline Dell Rudolph State Treasurer Wurst, Pearson TOTAL BILLS 2,165.00 10.79 286.09 1,110.04 100. OO 77. O0 ~88.50 367, O0 27,611.47 30.00 2,475.69 3,873.25 192.16 75. O0 75.OO 15.O0 1 O8. OO 39.18 7,978.4O 2,623.13 2,642.64 1,483.31 248.80 15.00 6,108.OO 96,495.18 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF CANARY LANE FROM WOODLAND ROAD SOUTH TO JENNINGS ROAD TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY.GIVEN' that the Mound City Council will hold a public hearing at the City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound,. Minne- sota at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, the 12th day of June, 1984, to con- sider the vacation of the following.described land: That part of'Tecumseh Lane as dedicated on the recorded plat of Woodland Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota, now known as Canary Lane, wh'ich lies between the westerly extensions of the northerly and southerly lines of Block 9, of said Woodland Point. Rese'rving a 10.foot drainage easement over and across the. above described vacated Canary Lane being 5 feet on each side' of the center line of said Canary Lane. SUch persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above wi'l] be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF MOUND CASE NO. 84-325 FEE $150.OO DATE FILED 5-1-84 APPLICANT ~'~¢Ll~ ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: PID # ' ~ ~:.--'.~'~.~! LOT ~.1~,~ ~l J ~ BLOCK ~ SUBDIVISION ~~iJ ~ ~l~ ~Jl ~~ ' ~ - -r'F~- MAY 2-I~ ~ll . " . - '~ - "- 0~" OF MO(~D SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT~ JV~ J~- ~"~"' ~ ~- .. TEL. Applicant's Interest ~n Property ~ " (Please attach list. Certified mailing list'can be obtained from HennepJn County by. calling ?~8-~271) Recommended by Utilities: NSP ~-M ; Minnegasco ~- ,.; Continental Telephone Recommended by'City: Public Works ~ .; Fire Chief ~ ,.; Engineer.~.~.; Police Chief ~< _; Cable Systems' ~ _; ~.Other Departments Planning Commission Recommendation: Date 5-14-84 Council Action Resolution No. Date U May 7, 1984 COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ! LAND SURVEYORS [] PLANNERS CASE NO. 84-325 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Ms. 0an Bertrand City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: City of Mound Vacation of Canary Lane Woodland Road to 3ennings Road File #2113, General Dear Jan: We have reviewed the request for vacating Canary Lane and do not see any reason for the City to retain this property. If the two applicants have pur- chased all the lots listed on the application for street vacation, then the only other property affected would be Lots 23 and 24, Block 9 and the City own- ed land. Lots 23 and 24 are owned by one part, with a home on Lot 24 and the driveway to Woodland Lane. As far as we can determine, there are no City util- ities located in this portion of Canary Lane. We would recommend that the City retain a ten foot drainage easement, five feet on either side of the existing centerline of Canary. We would also recommend vacating the length of Canary from Woodland Road to Jennings Road. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ' 3o~hn CamerOon~7~g~'''''- OC:sj Planning Commission Minutes May 14, 1984 CASE NO. 84-325 Case No. 84-325 Vacation of Canary Lane from Woodland Road to Jennings Road Greg Kohl of 5149 Woodland Road represented the applicant, Kenneth Weber. Also p~esent were Joane Fillbrandt and A1Hofstadler. The Building Official explained the request is to vacate Canary Lane south from Woodland Road to the Lake approximately 175 feet to Lot 7 of Block 8 and to Lot 18 of Block 9, Woodland Point. The Engineer is recommending the vacation south to Jennings Road retaining a ten foot drainage easement, five feet on either side of centerline of Canary. Mr. Hofstadler has Lots 23 and 24 of Block 9; his drive comes off Canary Lane. The dotted line.on the ½ Section Map is edge of wetlands and then there is about 60 feet of marshy area to open water. Owner- ship of land abutting Canary Lane was discussed and accessibility to. lake down thi~ lane. Kohl stated that no vehicle could get down there. Purpose of reques is to be able to landscape and blend it into recently purchased land on which Weber plans to .build a home. Hofstadler said he had no objection to the vacation, but he has filled about 20 feet of Canary going back 40 feet. He would, like the portion he has filled and would like light pole moved as getting into his garage is difficult. Chairman advised, if vacation approved, he would get half of Canary (15 feet) and would have to negotiate with the other owner for the additional footage. Kohl owns Lots l, 2, 3 and 4, Block 8. Weber owns Lots 3, 4, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of'Block 3. Byrnes moved and Michael seconded a motion to recommend the vacation of Canary Lane from Woodland.Road to Jennings Road. The vote was unanimously in favor. City Council to be asked to set 'Public Hearing for June 12, 1984. CASE NO. 84-325 feet ..~, . COMMON RESOLUTION NO. 84- PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE #84-325 RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN STREET EASEMENT OF CANARY LANE FROM WOODLAND ROAD SOUTH TO JENNINGS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City Council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, or public way, or any part thereof, when it appears in the interest of the public to do so, and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has claimed a street and utility easement over the following described land: That part of Tecumseh Lane as dedicated on the recorded plat of Woodland Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota, now known as Canary Lane, which lies between the westerly extensions of the northerly and southerly lines of Block 9, of said Woodland Point. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 12, 1984, WHEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires the this easement be vacated and that it would be in the public interest to do so. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the City Council does hereby approve the vacation of the street and utility easement over the following described land: That part of Tecumseh Lane as dedicated on the recorded plat of Woodland Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota, now known as Canary Lane, which lies between the westerly extensions of the northerly and southerly lines of Block 9, of said Woodland Point. Reserving a 10 foot drainage easement over and across the above described vacated Canary Lane being 5 feet on.each side of the center line of said Canary Lane. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 City Council and Staff Mark Koegler, City Planner June 5, 1984 Swimmi n~ Pools In April, it became apparent to staff that swin~ning pools were not adequately covered under the existing zoning ordinance. In order to clarify this issue, staff recommended that swimming pools be added to the list of accessory uses in the residential zones. The Planning Ccmmission concurred with this opinion and requested that a public hearing be established to review the appropriate language for the ordinance. Staff recommends that the ordinance be modified in the following manner: A. Amend Section 23.604.4, Permitted Accessory Uses, to add the following: Private Swimmir~ pools having a water depth of two (2) feet or more which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests provided that the following conditions are met: Pools should be located not less than fifteen (15) feet frc~n any rear property line, ten (10) feet frcra any side yard property line and in the case of corngr lots, not less that fifteen (15) feet from a side street property line. All pools shall be at least twenty (20) feet from a principal building on an adjoining lot. e NO private pool shall extend forward of the established front building line. The swimming pool shall be entirely enclosed by a protective fence or other permanent structure not less that five (5) feet nor more than six (6) feet in height. Such protective enclosure shall be maintained by locked gates or entrances when the pool is not tended by a qualified and responsible person. B. Repeal Section 23.407(6). CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE Of HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 23.604.4 OF THE MOUND ZONING CODE ORDINANCES NOTICE IS'HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, June 12, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, the Mound City Council will hold a hearing on the proposal · to amend Section 23.604.4, Mound Code of Ordinances, entitled "Zoning" by adding the following statement to the list of'per- mitted accessory uses in the R-l, R-2, R-3 and R-4 districts. Swimming pools which are operated for the.enjoyment and convenience of the residents, of the principal use and their guests. All persons appea~ing at said hearing will be given an opportunity to be heard. F/a'ncene ~. Cl~ar'E', City Clerk' June 11, 1984 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Enclosed are copies of the two bids we received this morning for the Dump Truck/Snow Plow. They total: Boyer Ford Truck $59,393.00 Lakeland Ford Truck $59,515.00 In checking over the bids we noticed that Boyer Ford Truck had not complied with the specifications for the seat. A Bostrom West Coast Driver's Seat was specified. Boyer specified as an exception, the National Cush-N-Aire Lo Back Air Suspension Driver's Seat. If Boyer had bid correctly, their bid would have been: $59,393.00 + $126.O0 = $59,519.OO That would make Lakeland Ford Truck the low bidder at $59,515.00 Delivery is for late January or February, 1985. That is why we are bidding it at this time. We will need it badly for the 1985 snow season. JE:fc enc. CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA All bidders specified. All prices are to Cab and Chassis Dump Body Snow Plow Wing Under Tail Gate Sander BID PROPOSAL DIESEL POWER SINGLE AXLE 31,000 GVM WITH PLOW, WING, DUMP BODY AND SANDER must submit bids on this form to furnish equipment as include mounting and F.O.B. Mound, MN. Make Model Make Model Make Model Make Model Make Model Total Price of Cab Chassis, Dump Sander: .Body; Snow Plow, Wing and Firm 7 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA BID PROPOSAL DIESEL POWER SINGLE AXLE 31,000 GVM WITH PLOW, WING, DUMP BODY AND SANDER All bidders must submit bids on this form to furnish equipment as specified. All prices are to include mounting and F.O.B. Mound, MN. Cab and Chassis Dump Body Snow Plow Wing Under Tail Gate Sander Make ~ORD Model LSOOO Make Hell . Model UL. Make Prink Model hgl I?ISA-W~ Make Prink Model 1OBRA38 Make Swenson UR 310 Model . U~. ).10 Total Price of Cab Chassis, Dump .Body; Snow Flow, Wing and Sander: $59,393.00 N~t±onal Account' s ~M~r. .... Title Bpyer Ford Trucks~Inc. Firm June 11,1 Date * Exceptions: 23~0OO lb. capacity two speed rear axle (Eaton 23221 ) ILO of 25,Q9,0 lb. capacity. Nat~b~nal Cush-N-Aire Lo Back air suspension drivers ~at and matching fixed suspension passenger seat, ILO Bostrom v~est Coaster Lo Back (mechanical suspension) drivers seat and matching fixed suspension passenger seat.. If Bostrom seats are desired add $126.00. 7 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: 1985 Diesel Power Single Axle 31,OOO GVW with Plow, Wing, Dump Body and Sander The City of Mound hereby solicits bids for the purchase of a 1985 Diesel Power Single Axle 31,OOO GVW with Plow,'Wing, Dump Body and Sander. A complete set of specifications is available from the City Clerk, City of Mound, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, 55364 or 612/472-1155. Sealed bids will be opened and read aloud at~lO:O0 A.M., Monday, June 11, 1984, by the City Clerk, City of Mound in the City Hall. F~ancene C. Clark x City Clerk Publish in The taker May 14, 1984 Construction Bulletin May 18, 1984 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS Any deviation in detailed requirements must be noted on a separate sheet. Each bid must have descriptive literature. Bid Security: A cashier's check or certified check in the amount of 5% of the total bid OR a bidder's bond in the amount of 10% of the total bid, made out to the City of Mound, must accompany each bid. Sealed bids should be clearly marked in the lower left hand corner of the envelope with the following: BID: DIESEL POWER SINGLE AXLE 31,000 G.¥.W. WITH ATTACHMENTS. TO BE OPENED - JUNE 11, 1984, AT 10:00 A.M. Bids should be sent to the City of~ound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364. SPECIFICATION FOR SINGLE AXLE 31,000 G.¥.M. CAB AND CHASSIS WITH REVERSIBLE ... PLOW,.WING, DUMP BODY AND SANDER INTENT; It is the intent of these specifications to describe equipment that will standardize the City of Mound Snow Plowing Fleet and is best suited to our needs. CAB. AND CHASSIS: Shall be diesel powered single axle as per minimum specifications. ENGINE: 210 H.P., 3208 Cat., Fuel Water Seperator, Vernier Throttle Control. FRONT AXLE; 12,000 lb. with power steering, factory installed rubber splash shields around wheel wells on front fenders, mud flaps rear or front fenders. REAR AXLE;, 25,000 lbs. - 2 speed. CAB TO .AXLE; 84 inch minimum. SPRINGS; Front - 8,000 Rear - 11,500 Auxiliary - 2,250 TRANSMISSION;. Spicer 6052C, 5 Speed, Close Ratio. BATTERIES; 3 - 93 amp batteries 625 CCA. BUMPER TO BACK OF CAB; 105 inch minimum. MIRRORS;. Stainless steel dual west coast with 6" stainless auxiliary convex mirrors. BRAKES; Full air cam type, 12 cu. ft. compressor spring lock parking brake with MGM chambers. AIR DR~ER; B.W. type'. FRA~E~ ~.g $~ ~0,000 PSI, ~i~h ~" integral frame extension, welded or bolted on type not acceptable. FRONT TIRES; 10:00 x 20 14 ply tires. REAR TIRE~ 10:00 x 20 mud and snow Firestone Super all traction with spare rim. TURN SIGNALS; Self cancelling type. HEATER; Heavy duty - deluxe with defroster. CLUTCH;, duty 14" 2 plate. west coast drivers with passenger. Tilting fiberglass with butterfly opening. Hood must be low enough front and sides so as to allow plow to be visible for driver. GLASS; Tinted throughout. HORN; Dual air with snow covers. RADIO;, AM/FM type. WHEELS; Cast spoke 7.5" pc. rims. ........ CRANKSHAET O.P_~_NING; ......... ..... Shall be supplied core~ radiators (not acceptable). FUEL TANKS;, 50 gallon left hand step type. GAUGES; Linehaul instrument panel, with hour meter, tachometer, warning lights and buzzer. EXHAUST; Vertical left side mounted with heat shield. angled rather than straight. Stack opening to be ALTERNATOR; 90 amp minimum. PAINT:, 9355546H Orange. DUMP BODY; Reference: Size: Capacity: Floor: Sides: Tailgate: Corner Posts: Understructure: Welds: Cab Shield: Side Braces: Spreader Chains: Running Boards: Hoist: Class: Model: Hydraulics: Pump: Valves: Controls: Check Valve: Filter: Oil Reservoir: Taillights: Miscellaneous: LIGHTS; Roof Bmr: Turn Lights: Plow Lights: Stop Lights: Beacon: Wing Lights: Hell SL 9' x 7' 5 to 6 cubic yards 8 gauge high tensile with 2" radius 10 gauge high tensile Fully boxed type air actuated for dumping with center mounted lever for dropping tailga, te. Full depth rear corner posts. Interlaced type. Stacked not acceptable. Continuous weld throughout. 1/2 cab type, mounted with clearance for verticle exhaust and right hand mounted wing post. 6' side braces with drain holes and boxed top rails. 3/8" Sloped type. Underbody single cylinder with hardened cromed cylinder rod. .50 power up and power down. Heil 1821 D.A. Front mounted off crankshaft. Cessna L70523 load sensing pump. Gresen V2OLS for dump body, sander (with detent), plow raise~ and plow angling, three valves for wing. Morse type. Contact City for mounting. LT75 with indicator. Gresen FTM112-1EDO tank type mounted. 30 gallon capable of accepting above mentioned filter with gate valve. Stop lights and taillights recessed into rear corner posts. Rear tow hooks, 2 body support props, electric backup alarm, raised body light and mud flaps front and rear of duals. Akrow Model 539-75-300 Removable type with 6 wire plug and socket. Double faced mounted on roof bar. Sealed beam mounted on roof bar with dimmer switch. 7" stop lights~ mounted on roof bar. Whelen Strobe II 1200 amber stroke mounted on counter balanced bracket on cab shield. Contact City for mounting. 2 sealed beam lights mounted on roof bar. POWER REVERSIBLE POLYMAR SNOW PLOW;, Model: Frink 4511PISA-WG Size: 45" high by 11' long. Moldboard: Polyethelene one piece, 3/8" thick, 7000 P.S.I. tensile strength. Cutting Edge: Tripping type one section by means of 6 torsion springs, 1/2" x 8" C1090 steel, punched AASHO. Tripping moldboard not acceptable. Reversing Mechanism: Drive Frame: Spray Guard: Worm gear type with hydraulic motor rather than cylinders. Cylinder type not acceptable. Rugged tubing construction with bolt on gear sections. Bolt on 12" wide x 1/4" thick rubber belt. SIDE TYPE LEVELING WING; Model: Size: Ribs: Top Edge: Tripping Mechanism: Wing Braces: ~abinet: Mounting: Frink 10BRA38 10' long overall, 29" high at nose, 37" high at rear. 6 verticle ribs and-2 full horizontal ribs. Completely boxed for greater strength. Wing shall be capable of trippling over an obstacle or being locked rigid. Heavy duty telescoping type with rear support beam 3/8" formed channel 12" wide. Enclosed type (protecting the rams and valves). On right side with 16" clearance between box and cab. HITCH; Model: Quick Attach: Lifting Device: Plow Portion: Frink Custom side plate type. Tor-Lok welded into custom side plate. 4" x 10" hard chrome plated piston. Arrowhead pin on type. UpNRE R~TA IL-GA-~E=_SA NDE R ~ _ Model: Swenson~ UR310 with hydraulic mo%or and controls. Light: Sander light within cab switch. MOUNTING;,, All equipment to be mounted by one vendor for service and warranty. PAINT; All equipment to be painted 9355546H Orange. WARRANTY; The manufacturer's standard warranty shall be an item of consideration. MANUALS: Manuals for the main unit and attachments shall be deliverd with the unit. REJECTION OF BIDS; The City of Mound reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any minor informaities in the bid. ,LOCAL MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE; The unit shall be furnished by or through a local authorized company or representative. Bidder must be a heavy duty truck ~ealer, The supplier shall provide full-time repair service. Local is defined as being in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. CIT¥ OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: 1985 Diesel Power Single Axle 31,000 GVW with Plow, Wing, Dump Body and Sander The City of Mound hereby solicits bids for the purchase of a 1985 Diesel Power Single Axle 31,OOO GVW with Plow, Wing, Dump Body and Sander. A complete set of specifications is available from the City Clerk, City of Mound, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, 55364 or 612/472-1155. Sealed bids will be opened and read aloud at 10:O0 A.M., Monday, June 11, 1984, by the City Clerk, City of Mound in the City Hall. Fl~ancene C. Clark City Clerk Publish in The Laker May 14, 1984 Construction Bulletin May 18, 1984 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GAS STATION-CONVENIENCE STORE AT 5377 SHORELINE BOULEVARD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, July,~J~, 1984, at 7:30 P.M. at .the Mound City Hall, 5341Maywo°d Road, Mound, Minne- sota, the City Council will hold a hearing on the.application for a Conditional Use Permit.for a gas station-convenience store at 5377 Shoreline Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota. Legal description as follows: Commencing at Northwest corner of Block 4 than East along road 150 feet than South parallel with line of said Block distance 1OO feet than West at right angles to West line thereof than North to beginning, Shirley Hills Unit F - PID # 13-117-24 34 0063 (Formerly the Metro 500 Station location) All persons appearing at said hearing will be gigen an oppor- tunity to be heard. FEa6~n'e -C[ Clark, City Clerk~ CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota CASE NO. 84-328 & CASE NO. 84-329 Planning Commission Agenda of May Board of Appeals Case No. 84"-328"& Case No. 84-329 Location: 3005 Brighton Boulevard Legal Desc.: Lots 2,3,34 and 35, Block 15 Arden Request: Lot-split'subdivision and lot width variance. Zoning Dist.: R-2 Applicant James W. Rafferty 3005 Brighton Boulevard Mound', MN. 55364 Phone: 472-6542 The applicant is requesting a waiver to the provisions of Chapter 22 Sub- division regulations to subdivide a parcel of less than 5 acres. He is re- questing to split up the lots to allow two building sites as follows: Lot 2 and the North 1/2 of Lots 35 and 3 (8,000 square feet of area)'a~d Lot 34 and the South I/2 of Lots 35 and 3 (8,000 square feet of area). The lot width fronting on the improved right-of-way would be 60 feet and 20 feet respec- tively. The Zoning Ordinance, Section 23.605.5(2) requires a minimum lot width of 40 feet and a lot area of 6,000 square feet for the R-2 Zoning Dis- trict. The applicant wanted to provide a 20 foot access to a building site at the rear (West) off of the Brighton Commons. The Brighton Commons is used to the South as a paved right-of-way; with houses on the block having building setbacks from the back (West) lots. The present structure on Lot 2 has non- conforming setbacks to the front (12.5 feet instead of 20 feet) and to the South side (2.1 instead of 6 feet). The lots are all relatively, level with. the lake elevation. Comments: Staff would like to mention that setting a structure to the West and aligning a new structure with the average of the existing homes should be required. Also, the 20 foot wide access should be suf- ficient to provide emergency vehicle access to a site at the rear. The present structure on Lot 2 would have a conforming side yard of 22.1 instead of 2.1. If the lots were sold as platted, however, Lot 3 and Lot 34 would be a legal building site of 8,000 square feet as well as Lot 2 and 35. The existing st-ructure setback to the front lot line would remain non-conforming. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This will be on the City Council Agenda May 22, 1984. Jan Bertrand Building Official JB/ms NOTE: Applicant has requested to be put on the June llth Planning Commission Agenda. They are supposed to submit a new site plan. Cas~ No.'s 84-328 and 84-329 Lot-split subd~ivision and Lot Width Variance for 3005 Brighton Boulevard - Lots 2, 3, 34 and 35, Block 15, Arden Fred Kellogg represented James W. Rafferty. The Building Official explained that actually the,se are 4 separate tax parcels of land. right now. Mr. Rafferty is requesting to subdivide the land as follows: 1st parcel - he ~buld add N. ½ of 3 and N. ½ of 35 with Lot 2 and 2nd parcel - add S. ½ of 3 and S. ½ of 35 with Lot 34 (8,000 square feet each parcel).. Mini- mum lot area requirement is 6,000 square feet with 40 feet minimum width fronting on an improved public right-of-way. She explained with this proposal, the width of the lots fronting on the public right-of-way would be one at 60 feet and the other at 20 feet. As the Zoning Ordinance stands, except for the O.H.M., she would not have an established setback off of the back lots. 'There are homes that have a setback off of the paved portion of Brighton Commons to the South, but these lots do not abut a public right-of-way. The existing structure on~': Lot 2 has 2 nonconforming setbacks. Discussed if lots sold as platted, property line'could be moved to give Lot 2 and 35 enough sideyard so existing structure would only have a front yard nonconformancY. The City Manager stated they are asking for a ma]or variance and brought up that under L.M.C.D. standards, they are not even eligible for a dock---have to have 25 feet or m~re on lakeshore (commons or private lakeshore). He feels it would be setting a precedent to allow this manipulation of square footage and setbacks. Request and options were discussed. If 4 feet of Lot 3 were put with Lot 2, structure would only have front yard setback nonconformancy and the other parcel would be within 10~ of the required 40 feet street frontage. Jensen moved and Byrnes seconded a motion to recommend denial of the request. The vote was unanimously in f~vor. Mr. Kellogg will discuss this with Mr. Rafferty 'and let Staff know whether they w 11 change ~heir reques~ before forwarding it to the City Council. ASE II r'i ~,¥_~1~ i:J! VILLAG~ O; MOUND ' NO'. 84-328 FEE OWNER James W. Rafferty PLAT ~1~) PARCEL 24-117~2'4-'43-0025 24-117-24-43-0026 24-117-24-44-0173. 24-117-24-44-0174 Location and complete legal description of property Ko be divided: 3005 Brighton Blvd., Mound, MN Lots 2 - 3 - 34 - 35, Block'15, Arden Addition ZONING To be divided as follows: Parcel A Lot 2 and N 1/2 of Lot 35 and 3 Parcel B " · Lot 34 and S 1/2 of 35 and 3 {attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FO .R.: New Lot No. From Square feet TO S<~uare feet Reason: ' APPLICANT ~ ADDRESS 50~U She M d, MN 55364 Applicant's interest in the property: OwNer TEL. NO. (612) 472-6542 DATE This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the. case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND~ATION: DATE ii !"i NAY _ Zi 198A I ~ ~..t ....... ~-' c.~ ~ ~ p Street Address of Property Legal Description of Property: Addi$ion Arden Owner's Name James W. Rafferty Address 5549 Sherwood Drive Case CITY OF MOUND ~-0. oo Fee'Paid 3--~'-;-~ -~ ~Date F~iled ,~-.oo CATION TO PLANNING ~ .ZONING COHHISSlON ease type the following information) 3005 Brighton Lot s 2 - 3 - 34 - 35 Block 15 Day Phone No, 472-6542. Mound, MN 5~36'4 Applicant (if other [han owner): Name Day phOne No. Address 5.' Type of Request: (X) Variance ( ) Conditlbnal Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other *If other, specify: '~,'? Present Zoning District ~7-." Existing Use(s) of Property ': Has an application eveP' been made for zoning, Variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? NO If sb, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, 9r of posz~k(~g, ~aigtaining and removing such notices as may be require~by law. · Signature of Applicant ~ __-~ .... Planning Commission Re~ommen ion: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date Request'for ZOning Variance ~rocedure (2). Case # 84-329 D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities. E, Indicate North compass direction .F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zoning Variance A. All.lnformatlon below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does.the present use of. the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it.is located? Yes (X) No 6 )' If ,'no", specify each ~on-conforming.use: Do the existing-structures comply, with all area~height and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is.located? Yes (X) No ' ( ) if "no", specify each non-conforming use: D.. Which unique physical characterl.stics ~f the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ~ .Too narrow ( ) Topography' ( ) Soil ( )' Too. small ( ) Drainage. ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow (X) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: E. .Was the hardship described abOve'created by the action of anyone having . property interests in the land after 'the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (Z) If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (×) If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for'which'you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (×)- No ( ) if no, how many other properties are similarly affected? H. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using . maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) SEE ATTACHED "1. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? NO O_x ~ o I c.~ ,-. t' z z~z~ uo~I : o o~ Oo Oo N u~H 'H Go~I-[~ .CASE NO. 84-328 84-329 MANCHESTER RD~o This block is all marsh %. CUMBEI: ,"' ~ ? i ~ ~]'~..,",F' M 0 UN D Application has been withdrawn. They are ~-~iocating - are re~N~%t~g,~,~und of fee. .~,~t ~r ~-~ APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following in¢ormatlon) Street Address of Property .' Legal Description of Property: lot Xdd,tio ,o. 'Fee paid... Block '----'- Day Phone No. Applicant '(if other than owner): Phone No. ?2- \ ( ) Variance (~) Conditibnal Use Permit (' ) Amendment ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Sign Permit ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.O. ( )*Other Type of Request: ~i~f other, specify: . ~', '~resent Zoning District 7~' 'EXisting. Use(s) of Property. -Has an application ever been made for zoning, vfriance, or conditional use permit or · other zoning procedure for this property?~JO ' 'If so, llist date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that ail of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate, i consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in thls application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspec'ting, or of posting, m~intaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. } ' Sign'ature of Applicant y~.~ Date.... ?l~nning Commission Recommendation: Date Ccuncil Action: Resolution No. Date CASE NO. 84-336 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of June ll, 1984: Board of Appeals Applicant Case No. 84-336 Gary L. Shaleen Location: 1687 Eagle Lane 1833 Shorewood Lane Legal Desc.: Lots 10 & 11, Block 3, Mound, MN. 55364 Dreamwood Phone: 479-.1865 Request: 3 Foot Front Yard Setback Variance Zoning Dist.: ~-3 The applicant is requesting to construct a lO by 12 foot deck on the south side of a newly constructed home at 1687 Eagle Lane within 21 feet to the south prop- erty line. The Zoning Code Section 23.408(5)allows One front yard to.be reduced to 20 feet for a lot Width of 51-80 feet on a corner lot of record. The R-3 zoning District Section 23.610.5(3) allows a front yard setback to be reduced to 24 feet for a lot depth of 61-80 feet on lots of record f. rom 30 feet for the R-3 district. The setbacks should be 20 feet and 24 feet. Comments: If the variance is granted for the unenclosed deck, it should be upon the condition that it would not.be enclosed without additional variance approval.' The applicant would like to make it a useable area rather a walkway/stoop area. The rear yard is only 17.77 feet to the property line from the house. A l0 foot setback is required from any deck to the rear. He is li'mited in lot area location for a deck. Also, Three Points Boulevard is 3 feet higher than the southwest building corner yard grade. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This item will be on the City Council Agenda for June 12, 1984. Buildi.n§ Official JB/ms ~OUND ~,~. o o APPLICATION TO PLANNING [, ZONING COMMISSION (Please type ~he following information) Property 1~]7 ~f~6~ Case No. Fee Pa i d 0 Date Filed 2. Legal Description of Property: Lot 'Block Addition.~)~~TW~OZ2 PID No../[~-//7 - P_..V )2 oo P__ 3. Owner's Name. ~-A/~.¥ L. ~/~-~/~2-~/d Day Phone Np.~2~-iB~' Address / 933 4. Applicant (if other [han owner): Name Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: j~)-Variance ( ) ConditiOnal Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation &~eview ( ) Wetland Permi~ ( ) P.U.D. ~If other, specify: ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other Zoning District //~--~ Existing Use(s) of Property ~ ~ ~, /I Has an application ever been made (Jor zoni~ng, va~/ance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? ~/~ If so, list date(s) of list date(s)'of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all'of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in thi~-application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Planning Commission Recommendation: Date ~il Action: Resolution No. Date bI82 Request for Zoni.ng Variance ~rocedure (.2) D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Ill. Request for a Zonin9 Variance A. All information below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does.the present use of. the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes (~ ~o (' )' If "no", specify each non-conforming.use: Do the existing structures comply with ali area height and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is.located? Yes (~'~) No ( ) If "no", specify each non-conforming use: Which cmique physical characteristics ~f the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses.permitted in that zoning district? (~) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too. small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow.. ( ). Shape ( ) Other: Specify: Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having. property interests in the land after-the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No ()~) If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (,'<') If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for'which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (;~')- No ( ) If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? What is the "minimum" modification '(variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ~"o/-/& 77'. .? I ! . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 10 and 11, Blo'ck 3, Subject to easements of o Denotes iron monument o Denotes offset stake x ooo.o Denotes existing elev. ooo.o ) Denotes Proposed elev. DEblARS - GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth MN 55441 Phone: (612) 55g-0908 DREAMWOOD, record. Hennepin County Proposed lowest floor elev. = Proposed top of foundation elev. = BENCH MARK: Denotes surface drainage Proposed garage floor elev. = <) qT. 0 ----------- --'------- I hereby certify that thi~ is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. 7,6 I As s,,rOyed ~,Y me W ,,' . .... '/' .... , ~..~ :.:.-' .~r /' ' I/ File No. Book - Page Scale $ ~'o.I PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE #84-336 RESOLUTION NO. 84- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOF~4ENDATION TO APPROVE A 3.0 FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE, FOR LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 3, DREAMW00D (PID #13-117-24 12 0032) 1687 Eagle Lane WHEREAS, Gary L. Shaleen, owner of property described as Lots 10 and 11, Block 3, Dreamwood (PID #13-117-24 12 0032), 1687 Eagle Lane has applied for a variance in setback to the front lot line of 3.0 feet to construct an unenclosed 10 by 12 foot deck; and WHEREAS, the City Code 23.408(5) allows a 20 foot and 24 foot setback to the street front due to lot width and depth for lots of record on corner lots; Section 23.610.5 (3) for lots of record in the R-3 district reduction for an 80 by 80 feet lot refers to depth of lots of record; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval due to the narrowness, shallowness, and to afford the owner reason- able use of the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the 3.0 foot front yard setback variance, as requested, upon the condition that the unenclosed deck would not be enclosed~without additonal variance approval. Legal Description o¢ Property: Lot CITY OF MOUND Case No. ?¥-33 Y APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type t. he following information) Fee Paid 3~¢. ~ ¢ 1 &2 Date Filed Addition Whipple Owner-' s Name ,~ ~..~?~/ c~ ~'.x~-~ ~,~ ~ Applicant (if other than owner) 'Block 8 PID No. 2~-117-24 21 0016 37970/0750 Day Phone No. Name Day Phone No. Address Type of Request: (~) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit -- ( ) Zoning Interpretation &~eview ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( ) Amendment (X) Sign Permit ( )*Other *If other, specify: Zoning District Existing Use(s) of Property Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or .other zoning procedur.e for this property? ~/~C~. ~ tf so, list date(s) of list date(s)'of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all'of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in thi~ application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and r~moving such notices as may be require~.by law. ~ Signature of Applicant ~ Date ~ ~ ~/ Planning Commission Recommendation: Date cil Action: Resolution No. · APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT CITY OF MOUND Street'Number SIGN LOCATION A1 & Alma' s LOT 1 & 2 PLAT' 37970 PARCEL 0750 PHONE NO. ~./~,~-- ~'~::~ ? ~ City Zip BLOCK 8 "~ ADDITION Whi pp, 1 e PID # 25-117-24 21 OO16 ZONING B-3 ~~~, ~l-~)~atJon~ s ~me as the L ~kewinds signs.~- BEING REQUESTED bENGTH OF TIME SIGN TO BE ERECTED: PERMAI~ENT TEMPORARY..~ t~emporary sign not to be for period in excess of two months) TYPE OF SIGN: WALL MOUNT PYLON.? FREE STANDING PORTABLE OTHER Does it conform to all setback and other requirements relating to the Zoning Ordinance? sign for a community organization and does it meet all the standards(Ord. 440)? / If additional information is attached; please 'submit 8½" X 11" maximum sized drawings. Recommendation: Approved: City Manager CONSULTING ENGINEERS , LANO SURVEYORS = PLANNERS May 22, 1984 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. Son Elam Clty Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Lynwood Boulevard Proposed Street Improvements Mound, Minnesota #7193 Dear Jon: As requested we have investigated the possibilities of improving Lynwood Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to Belmont Lane. Lynwood Boulevard is currently on the Municipal State Aid system; therefore, any improvements undertaken could be paid for by State funds. Enclosed is a preliminary sketch showing a suggested new alignment for Lynwood. This proposed alignment would make it necessary for the City to acquire the bakery adjacent to the City owned Anderson building, a small portion of Super Valu's parking lot and also a 10 foot strip along Lots 6 through 11. After discussions with Mn/DOT District Engineer, we think the City would have a very good chance of purchasing these properties with MSA funds. Since the State's policy is to look at each situation and determine if the right-of-way acquisition is necessary, the only way to get an answer is to submit a council approved right-of-way plan. MSA funds would pay for onl~ the ~purchase...price, the City mus~ stand .~11 other~xpe~ 'such as aooraisal"fee~ attorney fees, closing costs e_~c. We would recommend the proposed alignment for the following reasons, even through the total project cost will be high due to the additional right-of-way required. From a design and safety standpoint the westerly end should line up with section of County Road 15 which goes west. This also holds true with the east end at the intersection with Belmont Lane. In 1980 Lynwood was improved to 32 feet wide from 8elmont Lane to the east. We feel any new construction of Lynwood to the west should line up with the existing street, therefore, the State will probably require the additional 10 feet of right-of-way along lo~s 6 thru 11. If this new alignment is ultimately approved, the City would end up with extra property which they would not need for these improvements. This would include an area adjacent ~o the Town Square site. 3on Elam May 22, 1984 Page Two We have prepared a very preliminary cost estimate for the proposed construction of Lynwood Boulevard, a copy of which is enclosed. As you will note from this estimate we have not included any cost for the right-of-way acquistion. We have also included a cost estimate for upgrading Belmont Lane to MSA standards from Lynwood Boulevard south to County Road 15. This estimate includes only additional signage for the Railroad crossing, not any mechanical devices. If the City wishes to proceed with~h__.~.b_~?oj~nf~ the first step would be t.t~. .prep-~-re a. Tr£ght--O~"wa~-plan for apprOval by the City Council dna then Subwit %t to the State,They would then determine if the properties to be acquired for /~r~g~t-ot~way are eligible for payment from MSA funds. The next step would be / preparation of the construction plans. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact US. Sincerely, ~ OC/WHM: j sures McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. William H. McCombs, P.E. Cos% Es%imate Street Improvement Lynwood Boulevard Item Quantity Unit Price Total Mobilization Common Excavation Granular Fill Class 4 Gravel Base Class 5 Gravel 8asa Rrime Coat 8ituminous Base 2331 Tack Coat Bituminous Wear 2341 6" Concrete Driveway Apron 4" Concrete Sidewalk 86-18 Concrete Curb & Gutter Adjust Manholes Adjust Gate Valves Adjust Curb Stops 4" Black Dirt & Sod Landscape (trees) Lump Sum $ 40,000 6500 C.Y. $ 3.00/CY 19,500 500 C.Y. 4.00/CY 2,000 910 TON 6.00/TN 5,460 870 TON 7.00/TN 6,090 800 GAL 1.50/GA 1,200 530 TON 25.00/TN 13,250 130 GAL 2.00/GA 260 510 TON 27.00/TN 13,770 1000 S.F. 4.00/SF 4,000 4320 S.F. 2.00/SF 8,640 1500 L.F. 5.50/LF 8,250 4 EACH 250.O0/EA 1,O00 3 EACH 200. O0/EA 600 6 EACH 150.O0/EA 900 2600 S.Y. 2.00/SY 5,200 Lump Sum 5~000 Sub-Total ....................................................... $135,120 Storm Sewer 12" RCP 15" RCP 18" RCP 21" RCP 21" Concrete Apron Catch Basins Catchbasin Manhole Storm Sewer Manhole Contingencies (10~) 120 L.F. 15.00/LF 1,800 440 L.F. 20.O0/LF 8,800 270 L.F. 25.00/LF 6,750 140 L.F. 27.00/LF 3,780 1 EACH 450.O0/EA 450 2 EACH 700.O0/EA 1,400 2 EACH 800. O0/EA 1,600 2 EACH 900.O0/EA 1,800 16~500 Total Estimated Construction Cost ............................... $178,000 Engineering, Legal, Fiscal & Administrative Cost (20%) 35~000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ........................................ $213,000 Cost Estimate Street Improvement Belmont Lane Item Quantity Unit Price Total Mobilization Lump Sum $ 15,000 Common Excavation 3000 C.Y. $3.00/CY 9,000 Granular Fill 200 C.Y. 4.00/CY 800 Class 4 Gravel Base 410 TON 6.00/TN 2,460 Class 5 Gravel Base 390 TON 7.00/TN 2,?30 Prime Coat 350 GAL 1.50/GA 525 Bituminous Base 2331 230 TON 25.00/TN 5,750 Tack Coat 60 GAL 2.00/GA 120 Bituminous Near 2341 220 TON 2?.O0/TN 5,940 4" Concrete Sidewalk 2100 S.F. 2.00/SF 4,200 B6-18 Concrete Curb & Gutter ?00 L.F. 5.50/LF 3,850 Adjust Manholes 3 EACH 250. O0/EA 750 Adjust Gate Valves 2 EACH 200.O0/EA 400 4" Black Dirt & Sod 1200 S.Y. 2.00/SY 2,400 Landscape Lump Sum 2,500 Addition work at railroad Lump Sum 2,000 crossing 12" PCP 15.00/LF 525 15" PCP 20.O0/LF 1,000 Catch Basins ?O0. O0/EA 1,400 Manhole 900.O0/EA 900 Contingencies 6~750 35 L.F. 50 L.F. 2 EACH 1 EACH Total Estimated Construction Cost ............................... $ 69,000 Engineering, Legal, Fiscal & Administrative Cost (2~) 14~000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST ........................................ $ 83,000 June 1, 1984 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Our latest request for a street light is for the end of Northern Road. John Ewald did his usual good analysis of the situation and brought forth the attached report. Although the reaction to a light is mixed, the point that Officer Ewald confirms is that the area is extremely dark and there is a need for a light in the area. Thus, we would recommend accordingly. JE: fc INTEROFFICE MEMO FROM: SUBJECT: Acting Chief William Hudson Officer Ewald Street Light Request DATE M Y_~~198.~_4 I made a check of the area on the west end of Northern Road during the late hours and it is extremely dark. Listed below are the residents who live in the area a- long with two additional residents who live on Rosedale Road who have the rear portion of their homes facing Northern Road. Resident Address Comment Leon Aasen 4940 Northern Road Has no children at home; states that it makes no difference if there is ~ street light or not. Max Wright 4948 Northern Road Has one daughter; age ~5; .states th't a street light is definitelY__n~eed_e:d. John Buchmaan 4956 Northern Road Has two children ages 2 and 5; states t__hat a street.light is neede! ~ad_~. Mentioned that there were alot of speeders in the area and he would like to see a "Slow-Child- ren'' sign posted. Brad Biermann 4964 Northern Road Has no children; states that it not make any difference whether there is a street light erected or not. He is renting this home and has dore so for the past year. Steve Cathers 4980 Northern Road Has one child, age ~; states that doesn't matter if a light is put up or not - either way is fine. Sally Christianson 4988 Northern Road Has two children, ages ~5 and ~8; states that she would like to see a~ least one street light at the end o5 Northern. Ray Dahlquist 500~ Rosedale Road His children are grown and live on their own but would like to see a street light and a "Slow-Chdldren" ~ign posted on Rosedale Road. Kelm 5005 Rosedale Rosd Has one child, age 5; states that h~~ would l±ke st tesst one street tigh , The re~!eot? d.~d~'t feel that private yard lights would '.:.e su'fficient. If I can be of further assistance, please let me kncw. ~Z'oN Z 1'1¢ ! .-% MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ABDO~ ABDO & EICK CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 3500 ~'EST 80th STREET, SUITE 440 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431 TELEPtlONE (612) 835-9090 OFFICES IN: MANKATO OWATONNA BLOOMINGTON April 16, 1984 Council Members City of Mound Mound, MN 55364 Dear Council Members: We have examined the financial statements of the City of Mound, Minnesota for the year ended December 31, 1983, and have issued our report dated April 6, 1984. We have not performed any 'substantive auditing procedures subse- quent to that date. As part of our examination, we made a study and evaluation of the City's system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards. The purpose of our study and evalua- tion was to determine the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial statements. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control. This responsibility also includes judgments and estimates by management in con- sidering the costs that will be incurred as opposed to the benefits derived. The following is a listing of areas that we feel warrant your review. Municioal Liouor Store Gross Profit Margin The gross profit on merchandise sales decreased nearly three percent in 1983. This is a significant decrease. - 2 - We recommend this reduction in gross profit percentage be carefully reviewed to determine the reasons for it. Also, as part of an overall marketing strategy, the Council should determine the gross profit percentage that is consistent with its marketing plan. Slow Moving Merchandise During our testing of inventory valuation, we noted several items which had very little, if any, activity (either purchases or sales) during the current year. We recommend the inventory be reviewed to determine the amount of slower moving merchandise and determine whether or not to continue to stock such merchandise. Perpetual Inventory Records Currently the liquor store uses a manual system to main- tain its perpetual inventory records. This appears to take a considerable amount of time to maintain. We recommend the City review the possibility of computer- izing the perpetual inventory records. It appears this should result in better inventory management and also increase operating efficiency. Water Utility Fund The Water Fund reported substantial operating income in 1983. This is the result of a major water user, not terminating its operations within the City as originally scheduled. The operations have been terminated in 1984 and operating income will be significantly reduced. 1984 water operations should be carefully monitored to insure the existing rates will be sufficient to cover expenses. General Fund Operations The General Fund fund balance increased by approximately $180,000 in 1983. This is a positive change in the finan- cial condition of the General Fund. We recommend the City continue to improve the financial condition of the General Fund to a point where the fund _1 17 - 3 - balance is $400,000 to $500,000. This should provide the City with an adequate fund balance to provide for working capital and cover revenue shortfalls or unanticipated expenditures. Liquor Store Transfers During 1983 the City transferred over $107,000 out of the Liquor Store Fund. This is much more than the net income of the liquor store in 1983. Additional transfers out of the liquor store above the net income of the store may affect its ability to maintain adequate working capital and inventory levels. We recommend the City not budget transfers out of the liquor store beyond its ability to generate net income. Old Outstandin~ Checks The bank reconciliation at year end indicated outstanding checks in excess of $3,000 from May 1982 and prior. We recommend the City review these items and determine if they can be written off or must continue to be recorded as outstanding checks. General Fixed Assets The City has not established its general fixed asset records to date although some work has been done on them. We recommend the City complete its fixed asset records which will provide control over all quantities and costs. In addition, these records will be valuable for insurance purposes and long range planning. This report is intended solely for the use of management and council. The comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature, and should be read in this context. Our examination would not necessarily disclose all weak- nesses in the system, because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related data. - 4 - If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the items contained in this letter, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. We wish to thank you for the con- tinued opportunity to be of service, and for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by your staff. Sincerely, ABDO, ABDO & EICK Certified Public Accountants Gerald W. Eick, C.P.A. Audit Partner GWE/la CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 DATE: May 30, 1984 TO: Jon Elam FRO~: Sharon Legg RE: Audit ~lanagement Letter You asked me to go over a few items in the management letter that Abdo,Abdo and Eick sent. MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE- I sent you a memo dated ~tay 1, 1984 regarding the first quarter liquor earnings which you included in the council packet. Most of the areas mentioned by the auditors should be covered by the new store manager. WATER UTILITY FUfID- Besides the first quarter statements that I already gave to you, I don't have much to add at this point. We will need to continue to monitor these funds up until budget time and through year-end to see what kind of rates to expect for 1985. GENERAL FU~ID OPERATIOIIS- Of course I agree with the auditors on this comment. The $181,0OO increase in 1983 was a great shot in the arm for this fund. I had $31,930 in cash at Itarch 31, 1984 versus a deficit cash balance of $141,615 at March 31,'.~983. On April 30, 1984 the cash is again in thelhole but with continued fund balance increases, the General Fund could rely on its own resources and maybe earn some interest to generate additional revenue for itself. LIQUOR STORE TRANSFERS- This is ouE next acea of concern, k.le budgeted a 1984 transfer to the General Fund of $50,000 which will drain the Liquor Fund cash reserves if made along with a transfer to pay for the 1984 Sealcoat Project. You'll note that the cash balance was only $69,000 at December 31, 1983. Add to that income of about $30,000 for 1984 and we only have $99,000 in cash. ~4e budgeted transfers at about $1OO,0OO for 1984 which leaves the Liquor Fund with no cash for 1985. ~lhen we do the 1984 budget projection for the General Fund, we'll see if the General Fund can possib!y.b~eakCeven without a $50,000 transfer. (~']e will have that additional $17,000 in Local Governmental Aid which will help.) 'OUTSTANDING CHECKS- There are $3123.67 in outstanding checks from 1981. I will write these off with the exception of one for $2200.00 tied up in a lawsuit which Curt is handling. ~le monitor these on a current basis now so they don't get so old and hard to research. GENERAL FIXED ASSETS- Once again the auditors commented on our lack of fixed asset records. We do keep track of current additions and I haven't forgotten about establishing records on old assets, but it seems to be on the bottom of my priority list. If you or the Council feel strongly about getting this done, I think we should consider hiring an intern or someone to help. If there are any questions regarding the letter or the report, let me know. MAY Z 4 19844 APPLICATION FOR CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION 3.2 BEER PERMIT ~u.~O - 3 Days + 2.00 Per Day for eaci! additional day. 1. Name of Organization 2. Address of Organization 2415 Wilshire Blvd. 3. Name of Person Applying for Permit Bob Cheney 4. Organization Title of Person Applying for Permit 5. Dates Permit Will Be Used: From 6-15 6. Address at which Permit will be used 7. Does the Organization carry Liquor Liability Insurance 8. If answer to No. 7 is YES, please list: (a) Name of Insurance Company. (b) Amount of Coverage ' 10. Mound Volunteer Fire Dept. - FISH FRY Fire Chief 1984 To 6-17 1984 2415 Wilshire Blvd. If this application to sell 3.2 Beer is on property owned by a public agency other than the City of Mound, written notice from the public agency giving permission for such sales must accompany this application. (a) Is Such written permission attached? N/A If this application is a request to sell 3.2 Beer on City property, the City requires Liquor Liability Insurance with limits of $3_00 ,12¢0. Date .( .... DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , APPLI~AiI6'N ~:OR CLUB ON SALE RETAIL LIQUOR This application' shall be executed by an officer of any club seeking on 'Sale Retail Liquor License, The applications will be filled with the city or village cl~rk together with the bond forms provided in M.S, Section 340. t2, Granting license by the city or village council is discretionary,' To qualify for' a license the club must comply with the provisions of M.S. Sections 340.07,'Subd. 15, and 340.11, Subd, 11, and applicable related statutes, The annual license fee to the Municipality is $100 and the privilege is limited to on-sale of intoxicating liquor to members and bona fide guests only, Every question must be truthfully answered and the application verified, To the governing body of the city or village of 1, Applicant and licensed premises: (Officer) for and in behalf of C~,~I~;~ ~6~2~ V F ~ ~/l~ ,. hereby apply for a club (Name gfllncorpotated Club) O. Sale. Retail Liquor License to be located on the / ~ floor at ~ C ~ CO ~ ~PE~ ~/~. ~t~r~ ~ a[~ {StreltAddress,or k ~ + ~ ~ , Municlpelity of ~ ~ ~ m g County of ~ < ~ m. /~, -- State Lot ina Bilk Number) ' ' - J of Minnesota, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chap~r 340, as amended, for period commencing Does the location comply with municipal zoning and building ordinances? Name the owner of the building and his address Are there any delinquent taxes on the pro~rty7 States 2. 3. My age is ~g years. My residence is _~//~ ~'~'~ t'.~'/c~t~' ~(u'~' . I oma citizen of the United Name of ,he bonding company 0~.0 ~ ~ . Amount of bond ~ ~' Continuous existence of bona fide club for 15 years is required; congresdonally chartered veteran's organization. 10 years. Give date when organized with continuous existence to present ~ .~ [ 9 Y~ Give date of local charter if affiliated with fraternal or veterans organization ~ r ~ ~ ~ y 4 4. The club shall be duly incorporated: Give date of incorporation /~-/.~ ~; I ~. ~ > l ~ ? Y Attach a copy of articles of Incorporation or Charter with 1st Application. The club shall be organized for civic, fraternal, social or business purposes or for intellectual improvement or promotion of sports. State purpose 5. The club shall have more than 50 active members. State how many it has ~ ~ 7 6. The club shall have occupied spa~ in a building suitable to accommodate its ~em~rs for more than a year. Has it done so? ~C ~ 7. The affairs of the club shall be managed b~ a board of directars, elective cammittee or similar body chosen by ,he mem~rs ara meeting held for that purpose. Give date of the most recent election meeting 4~,, I /~p[ Give names and residence addresses of the mem~rs of the managing board. / 8. No compensation ~halt be. paid by Way of profit from sale of beverages; however, salaries may De paid, · ' Are any members, officers,'agents or employees paid profits from sale of beverages to club members)._.~ O ' °'- A~;"any ~'mployees paid salaries? Y~$ ~ Give the name of.the person who wile manage the operation of the licensed business: Does any wholesaler 'or manufacturer of alcoholic beverages own or have any interest in furniture and fixtures or equipment for the licensed premises)~ 10. 11. 12. 13, 14. If so, give details Does the club intend to operate any lotteries or gambling devices upon the licensed premises? Does the club hold a public dance permit? Will the club hold an On Sale Non-intoxicating Matt Beverage License for the same premises) Has this club or any employee been convicted of a crime under Federal or State law or local ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages) /~lO If so, give names, dates, and offenses being duly sworn, depose and say: that the several answers and statements in this by me made are true and correct to my own knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me : U {Signature} this ~J/~h day of/ · }{a~r 198~ My commission expires ~"' ~'~ ~'commission'~ires DeC. REPORT ON APPLICANT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certJf? that I have investigated or caused an investigation of the a~ve named ~pplicant for an On Sate retail liquor license and the employees of the appEcant. The record of arrests and convections so far as investigation has disclosed is es follows: BY: TITLE '4. · ' ' LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION ' ' ' {1 Ft HAY I 0 This application shall be execute~ by an officer of any club seeking on Sale Retail Liquor License. The applications will be filled with the city or village c!erk together With the bond forms provided in M.S. Section 340.12. Granting license by the city or.village council is discretionary. To qualify for a license the club must comply with the provisions of M.S. Sections 340.07, Subd. 15, and 340. I 1, Subd. 11, and applicable related statutes. The annual license fee to the Municipality is $100 and the privilege is limited to on-sale of intoxicating liquor to members and bona fide guests only, Every question must be truthfully answered and the application verified. To the governing body of the city or village of Hn~md _. H~'nnesota 1. Applicant and licensed premises: l, Leslie Allen , as Mana_~er (Offlcar) for and in behelf of Minnetonka Post: 398, Amer:Lcen Le_~ion Club . hereby apply for a club {Name of incorporated Club) On Sale Retail Liquor License to be located on the ~I; floor at (Street Address or Municipality of Hound County of l-l~,n~-n State Lot and Block Number) of Minnesota, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340, as amended, for period commencing .T~'[y 1984 , ending .Tune 30 , 19 85 . Does the location comply with municipal zoning and building ordinances? yes Name the owner of the building and his addressH~"nnetonka PoRt: 398~ Amer'f~-~n T,eE~nn Are there any delinquent taxes on the property? My age is 6~ years. My residence is 2,354 · I am a citizen of the United States yPR , 2. Name of the bonding company ,c[t-nt~, ~,,~.~.~-.~ · m~'~6~ ~" g~ OOD O~ 3. Continuous existen~ of bona fide club for 15 ~eaEsj~ [eau~[ed: c~r.,~;~artered veteran's organization, 10 years. Give date when organized with continuous existence to present Give date of local charter if affiliated with fraternal or veterans organization, 1923 4. The club shall be duly incorporated: Give date of incorporation 1933 Attach a copy of articles of Incorporation or Charter with 1st Application· The club shall be organized for civic. fraternal, social or business purposes or for intellectual improvement or promotion of sports. State purpose Social, Scholarships, Sponsor Boys Stae & Boys Athletics, Welfare & Rehabilitation. 5. The club shall have more than 50 active members. State how many it has 300+ 6. The club shall have occupied space in a building suitable to accommodate its n~embers for more than a year, Has it done so? yes 7. The affairs of the club shall be managed by a board of directors, elective committee or similar body chosen by the members at a meeting held for that purpose. Give date'of the most recent election meeting ~a~ 1984 Give names and residence addresses of the members of the managing board. Charles C. Jackson. 6311 Bayridge Rd. Mound Jethro Philbrook. 6064 Aspen Rd. Mound Robert Shanley, 1~76 Canary Lane, Mound Mark W. Novakoski~ 5967 Hillcrest Rd, Mound, No compensation shall be paid by way of profit from sale of beverages; however, salaries may be paid. Are any members, officers, agents or employees paid profits from sale of beverages to club members? TtO~ 'Are any employees paid salaries? 7eS ~ Give the name of the person who will manage the operation of the licensed business; Leslie Allen 9. Does any wholesaler 'or manufacturer of alcoholic beverages own or have any interest in furniture and fixtures or equipment for the licensed premises7 no If so, give details._~ 10. Does the club intend to operate any lotteries or gambling devices upon the licensed pramises?~ 11. Does the club hold a public dance permit?~o 12. Will the club hold an On Sale Non-intoxicating Malt Beverage License for the same premises?..___.3/D_~ 13. Give the Federal Retail Liquor Dealers Special Tax Stamp number~ 14. Has this club or any employee been convicted of a crime under Federal or State law or local ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages? . 'nn If so, give names, dates, and offenses I, said Leslie Allen .on behalf ofMtnnet°nka Pose 398, American Legion being duly sworn, depose and say: that the several answers and statements in this by me made are true and correct to my own knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me this..~_~___.~., da¥of . ~4ay . .,19 84 . REPORT ON APPLICANT BY POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that I have investigated or caused an investigation of the above named applicant for an On Sale retail liquor license and the employees of the applicant. The record of arrests and convections so far as investigation has disclosed is as follows: ~TLE BY: - ~ ~ __ [Chi~/~f Police,~le or Marshall , 333 SJbley Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 STATE OF MINNESOTA (6z2) 296.s~ss DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY APPLICATION FOR pERMIT TO ONLY ALLOW CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR (This Application Shall Be Typewritten and Submitted Before June 1st of each Year) In answering the following questions "APPLICANT" shall ~ governed as follows: For a Partnership, one of the partners shall execute this application for all mem~rs of the partnership. For a Corporation, ond officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors, and stockholders. For a Club, one of the club officers shall execute this appfication for all the members. If additional space is required, use a separate sheet of paper, indicating by numar the question answered. (FEE FOR PERMIT -$151.50) EVERY QUESTION MUST B~ ANSWERED ~ ' /(N~me of pprlon making ippli~tion) (individual owner, planer, officer, club officer) hereby apply foe a_permit al~w~g consumption and display of intoxicating liquor to be located at Post Office of ~ ~ r//~ ~ Zip Code ~¢ ~(~ County of .~ ~-~'~ , {Township and Section) State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 340.119. Tel. No. ~/~- ~ '~-,~ (area coda) 4. FOR'A PUBLIC BUSINESS: If a partnership, state name and address of each member of partnership;if a corporation, state name and address of office~ and directors. (Name) (A~dresl) (Name) (Address) (Name) (Address) 5. FOR A PRIVATE CLUB: Date club was organized , is club incorporated , number of members , length of time in present location __ , is club building owned or rented , what is the membership dues , what are the requirement~ for membership Does club maintain lockers to be used by members for storing intoxicating liquor . Names of all officers and/or directors of the club: (Name) (Address) (Name) (Address) (Name) (Addrels) (Name) (Address) Enclose with this application a copy of the Constitution and By-Laws of the club and current list of bona fide members. 6. If applicant or any partner, corporation officer or director, club officer or director, is not a ci.tizen of the United States, list such non-citizens /'//~, n.- ~' 7. State name of person who will operate or manage business: Name) (Address) 8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located / 9, How are the premises classified under the zoning ordinance Approved for Violations by; Inspectlon Section D0 NOT USE Check Cash Rec'd, Rec'd. by Cashier 10. State name and address of owner or owners of building wherein the business will be located: {Name} (Addresl) 11. Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinances; ~f so, give date and details 12. Is applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, a member of the governing body of the municipality or county in which this permit is to be issued; if so., in what capacity 13. Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota /f/~ . Give name and address of such establishment 14. Furnish the name and address of at least three business references, including one bani< reference: (Name) (Name) 15. Will intoxicating liquor be sold on the premises ~. {a) State whether ap~licatioa i~: 1. Original ~ {~} Former licensee', name (Address} (Address) 2. Renewal ~' 3. Transfer , trade name 17. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, entirely separate and exclusive from any other business establishment . 18. State trade name to be used ~4~.//~/-/~//~/?-~; . 19. State whether an "On-Sale" or "Off-Sale" Non-Intoxicating Malt Beverage License has or will be granted in conjunction to this business and. for the same premises y}:: ~ , 20. Has there been issued, or wiil there be issued, a $54,00 Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Special Tax Stamp for the sale of liquor on these premises 21. Has your local government an ordinance regulating the consumption and display of intoxicating liquor 22. If operating under zoning ordinance how is location of building classified ~__-0 I hereby certify that ( have reed end understand every question in this application, end that the answers are true of my own knowledge· I further understand that the giving of f&[$1 information in this application, or the failure to give pertinent information constitutes cause for the immediate revocation of this permit. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT ANY PERMIT ISSUED HEREUNDER DOES NOT ALLOW THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR. Encl;'--ed_[[..l~ym_~n.~.~f.$15_l,~g.i~_.y_~b_!t~IO:~.h.~n ro_:~_~L_~[[.ec.~tqr es provided by M.S. 1967, Section 3~,0.119. NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION UNLESS APPROVED AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED: If applicant is located in the County, the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners or his Representative shall approve this application. (Chairmen, Board of County Commissioners or his ReprllentltiVl) If applicant is located in a Municipality, the President of the Council or his Representative shall approve this application. Subscribed ang, sworn to before me this ~ day of /,,_,..,~ . , ~9 My Commission expire~ ,f'"' ' " /5-3o Form PS9114-5-75 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR APPLICATION FOR COUNTY OR CITY ON SALE WINE LICENSE NOT TO EXCEED 14% OF ALCOHOL BY VOLUME This application and the bond shall be submitted in duplicate, Whoever s'hall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Corporation one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a partnership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED for and in behalf of Wine License to be located at County or City of /L~ F) (/ d~r ~ (Individual owner, officer, or partner) /)~_/g~_ /--~ r/ , hereby apply for an On Sale (Post Office Address) State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340, commencing . _ ~. 19 ~/¢, and ending _~ ~Jt~ , 19 ~.~". 2. Give applicants' date of birth (~ ~ ~'~ ~-~'" (Day) Birthdates of Partners or Officers of Corporation (Month) (Year) (Day) (Month) tYear) (Day) (Month) (Year) (Day) (Month) (Year) The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: 4. Is the applicant a citizen o.f the United States? '¥r ~.~ ~ / If naturalized state date and place of naturalization If a corporation, or partnership, state citizenship status of all officers or partners. 5. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address / 31 6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years? ./?. ~ .~.r ,~,. ..... £?'.., /~:.> /:r...a ,, /-.-/z'/;'.~: // ~ ' ~/~' ~.~ ~'c.:' I d/6 7. If a partnership, state name and address of each member of partnership If a ~orporation, date of incorporation ~" ~ ~ ' t~:~ , state in which incorporated amount of authorized capitalization /t/'~,~r~&~ , amount of paid in capital if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so state name and address 'of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each (Name) (Address - number and street or lot and block5 (City) (~me) / (Address - number and street or lot and block) (City) (Name) (Address - nun~.b, er and street or 1ot and block) (City} (Name) (Address- number and street or lot and block) (City) If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State? · Number of certificate of authority. If this application is for a new Corporation include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. If this application is for a RENEWAL of license state whether any changes have been made in the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws since the last issue of License 8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? 9. Describe the premises to be licensed. ~"'J'q---~,--'--~-'er 5~J ~-'e_~.~/.,~~..e..--z.r.- ~""h-~-'-?..~ 10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school? · State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or church 11. State name and address of owner of building //~/'~t//L¥ f~.?~,:~V,~-',z~- ~-~C9~ ~.7"~/='r-,' /~'<~'ff Has owner .of building any connection, directly or indirectly, with applicant? Are the taxes on the above property delinquent?, t/r--'' ~' t3. State wkether applicant, or an>' of his associates in this application, have ever l'.ad an application for a Liquor License rejected any municipality or State authority; if so, ~ve date and details ,/('--.,' 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details 15. State whether ~pplicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details 16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the county board of the county or council of the city in which this license is to be issued? tt-/'f---') If so, in what capacity*. If applicant for license is the spouse of a member of the governing body, or where other family relationship exists, such member shall not vote on this application. 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the ' premises for which license is applied, and if so give name and details /"/C'~, 18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota? Give name and address of such establishment 19. Furnish the name and address of at least three busin.e§s references, including one bank reference What is the seating capacity of this establishment~ /~ ~ During what hours will food be available? ~h'? ~ 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. State name of person who will operate restaurant. State name of person who will operate bar. :_]~.42 -,~ .,// ~ ~ ~/'.~-.~--' State number of people restaurant will employ. ~ ~ Will food service be the principal business of this establishment? ~"' -t~ r~ ,r State trade name to be used...xfi /' ~Z..,4//,,'t-/~ .G If this restaurant is in conjunction with any other business (such as resort, etc.) describe such business· 28. How many years has this business been in operation under this ownership ? ? 7 ,,G'.d/7. 29. State whether applicant has, or will be granted, an "On-sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Beverage" (3.2) and/or a "Set-up" License in conjunction with this wine license? '\f ,~-_~ ~ ~ ~' G / 30. Does applicant intend to sell wine to other than the consumer? 31. How many months of the year will this establishment be open? . ? ~'- 32. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of wine, rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Director; and all laws of the county; and I )y certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. (Signature of applicant) / Subscribed and sworn to before me this if ' (Notary P~b[ie) My commxss~on exp:res REPORT ON APPLICANT.OR APPLICANTS BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OR POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the applicant, or his associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to the sale of non-intoxicating malt liquor or intoxicating liquors, except as hereinafter stated It is my judgement that the appUcant will comply with the laws and regulations relating to the conduct of this business should a license be granted. Sheriff Date '- --~' ,'wu- ,~C-C)~iefo[Poi:ic "" ' City Form PS911~5-75 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC'SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR APPLICATION FOR COUNTY OR CITY ON SALE WINE LICENSE NOT TO EXCEED 14% OF ALCOHOL BY VOLUME This application and the bond shall be submitted in duplicate. Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to the following questionnaire shall be deemed guilty of perjury and shall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Corporation one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a partnership one of the "APPLICANTS" shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED for and in behalf of [~-© XJ<~-~ 0~- ~ b~'~ , as (Individual owner, officer, or partner) , hereby apply for an On Sale Wine License to be located at 3'-~-3 (Post Office Address) County or City of ~ t'-a {xa State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 340, commencing i9 '~'~ , and ending , 19.._ 2. Give applicants' date of birth ~- Birthdates of Partners or Officers of Corporation (Day) (Month) (Year) (Day) (Month) (Year) (Day) (Month) (YeaD (Day) (Month) (Year) The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States? ~'{ ['- <~ If naturalized state date and place of naturalization /k/~ kP, J ~ C~-5'Oq'4x If a corporation, or partnership, state citizenship status of'all officers or partners. 5. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address 6. What oc'cupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past five years9. If a partnership, state name and address of each member of partnership If a'corporation, date of incorporation amount of authorized capitalization if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so state , state in which incorporated , amount of paid in capital give purpose of corporation name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each (Name) (Address o number and street or lot and block) (City) (Name) Address - number and street or lot and block) (City) (Name) Address - nu.m. bet and street or lot and block) (City) (Name) (Address- number and street or lot and block) (City) If incorporated under the law~ of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State? · Number of certificate of authority. If this application is for a new c0rpo~-ation include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By-kaws. If this application is for a RENEWAL of license state whether :ny changes have been made in the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws since the last issue of License 8. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? 9. Describe the premises to be licensed· O 10. Is the establishment located near an academy, college, university, church, grade or high school? N/Cb · State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or church 11. State name and address of owner of building /--xCG_J( C- d.-- I '~ Hasowner of building any connection, directly or indirectly, with applicant? Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? .,x3 {3 State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application for a Liquor License rejected b': - any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and d~tails ~ ~' 14. Has the applican.t, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details 15. State whether ~pplicant, or any of his'associates in this application, during the past five years were ever convicted of any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details I~xj O 16. Is applicant., orany of his associates in this application, a member of the county board of the county or council of the city in which this license is to be issued? ~ C~ If so, in what capacity? If~applicant for license is the spouse of a member of the governing body, or where other family relationship exists, such member shall not vote on this application. 17: State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so give name and details 18. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota?~ Give name and address of such establishment 15. 'Furnish the name and address of at. least three busin$§s references, including one bank reference 20. What is the seating capacity of this establishment? 21. During what hours will food be available? ( 22. State name of person who will operate restaurant. 23. State name of person who will operate bar. Bo <~r,) ~ ~'"~ 24~ State number of people restaurant will employ. I ~,~ 25.: Will food service be the principal business of this.establishment? 26~. State trade name to be used. 27. If this restaurant is in conjunction with any other business (such as resort, etc.) describe such business. 28. How many years has this business been in operation under this ownership ? 29. State whether applicant has, or will be granted, an "On-sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Beverage" (3.2) and/or a "Set-up" License in conjunction with this wine license? 30: Does applicant intend to sell wine to other than the consumer? 31. How many months of the year will this establishment be open? /537 32. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of wine, rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Director; and all laws of the county; and I ,y certify that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. (Signature of applicant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~t~-t~- day of ~o~y ~blic) .~,~ REPORT ON APPLICAN3:'OR APPL'rCANTS BY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OR POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the applicant, or his associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to the sale of non-intoxicating malt liquor or intoxicating liquors, except as hereinafter stated. It is my judgement that the applicant will comply with the laws and regulations relating to the conduct of this business should a license be granted. Sheriff Date CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota e e ,TRANSIENT MERCHANT, HA%~ERS, PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS LICENSE I~TE OF BIRTH Mo. Day Y~ar Miuule Name Last Name NAMES OF PERSONS ASSOCIATED WITH LENGTH OF TIME FOR WHICH LICENSE IS DESIRED DW. SCRIPT~ON OF THINGS ~CES 0F ~SID~C3 0F T~ APPLICA~ . FOR ~ST (5) ~RS C~~' REFERENCES: (Give names and addresses of three) Phone No. June 12, 1984 CITY MOUND 534'~ I'd A Y~,'~'O O D MOUND, MINNESOTA E536z i612) 472-1~ 55 Mr. Roger Rager 1649 Gull Lane Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Roger, Enclosed is a copy of the Council Minutes concerning your Conditional Use Permit. As you will note, it asked the Staff to initiate proceedings to conduct a possible rovocation hearing regarding your Conditional Use Permit. In evaluating the conditions in our November 15, 1983, meeting, I have noticed a number of the conditions have been met, i.e. 1. Limit hours the deck may be used from 11:O0 A.M. to 10:OO P.M. 2. Complete driveway entrance hard surfaced. 3. Install parking posts on north side of parking lot. 4. Existing trash dumpster placed on a concrete pad and screened with a wooden fence enclosure. 5. The removal of the wooden pallets and replace with parking bumpers. My most recent inspection though does confirm that a number of other rather critical items have not been completed and the rear yard with its weeds and pile of wood is rather an eyesore. 6. Under your permit you were to have submitted plans for a retaining wall by May 1, 1984, and have the project completed by September 1, 1984. 7.Complete landscaping plan for the area near the deck and north side of parking lot. 8. Grade backside of parking lot and remove fill to facilitate drainage. Your temporary licenses were extended to May 15, 1984. They have been extended on a month to month basis since then. This would include and cover your restaurant license. Page 2 Mr. Roger Rager June ~2, ~9B4 We have granted you the benefit of the doubt repeatedly. Now I think it is your turn to move on completing the required items as soon as possible, starting with the submission of your May 1st final landscape plan and retaining wall plan. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, don Elam City Manager JE:fc enc. - November.15, 1983 Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion that the improvement of a' tennis court on 0utlot A, The Bluffs NOT be made. The vote was unani- mously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING; REALLOCATING OF $1,250 OF 1983 CDBG FUNDS The City Manage~ explained that the reallocating of $1,250 of 1983 -CDBG Funds is for paying part of the cost of installing a handicapped access at Pond Ice Arena. Jessen-moved and Charon seconded the following resolutxon. RESOLUTION ~83-200 RESOLUTION REALLOCATING $1,250 OF THE 1983 CDBG FUNDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CONTINUATION FROM OCTOBER 18TH MEETING; THREE POINTS TAVERN LICENSES FOR ROGER RAGER DBA The City Manager explained that he has derived some conditions for the issuance of the licenses from the reports of the City Planner, Police Chief and the Building Official. Mr. Rater was present and asked to present the Council with his answers to those conditions. The conditions and answers were as follows: "1 · Limit hours the deck may be used from 11:00 a.m. to 10:'00 p.m." .... Will. be complied with immediately. "2. Complete entrance driveway hard surfacing." .... Has been Install parking posts on north side of parking lot."---Will be installed in conjunction with improvements to north slope area "4 . "5 · Submit plans for the installation of a retaining wall by May 15, 1984, and have the project completed by September 1, 1-984."--.-Plans for a retaining wall or an approved alterna- tive will ~?~mpleted in accordance with the suggested sch- edule. . L.~,,/) Complete landscaping plan for area near the deck and north side of parking lot."---Will be completed in accordance with schedule in ITem #4 above. "6 · "7 · Existing trash dumpster to be placed on a concrete pad and' screened with a wooden ..... fence enclosure."---To be completed by December 1, 1983 .~/~t~ The removal of the wooden pallets and replace with concrete parking bumpers."---To be~ completed by December 1, 1983. 3 November 15, 1983 -, Grade back-side of parking lot and remove fill to facilitate drainage."---To be completed in conjunction with item #4 above. "9 · That the temporary licenses be extended for 6 months to May 15, 1984, at which time we will have detailed police reports for th~ location and the applicant will have had time to submit final site improvement plans."---Work with the Police Department and neighborhood residents to resolve potential operational problems and submit plans in accordance with Item #4 above. · The Mayor asked the Council if they had any items to add. He then asked the City Attorney if the City can condition the issuance of licenses. The Attorney stated yes, he believed they could. Mr. Rager stated that he and his planner have come up with an alter- nate idea for a retaining wall that would be as effective but not as costly. Their idea consists of regrading the slope to 3:1, mulching, seeding with Crown Vetch or Ajuga ground cover, and stabilizing the sYope and plant material with staked nylon mesh. The City Planner stated that he would agree that this alternate idea could accomplish basically the same thing as a retaining wall but would like to suggest something other than Crown Vetch because it spreads too much. Mr. Rager stated that he is open to suggestions on the type of ground cover to be used. The Council then discussed adopting an Evacuation Ordinance which~ would set a limit on the time patrons can stay on the property of a licensed liquor establishment past closing time. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to approve the issuance of temporary "On and Off Sale Beer Li.censes" and a set up license to Ro. ger& Gatl Rager, dba Three Points Tavern. The licenses shall · expire on May 15, '1984,to be reviewed by the Council at that time for renewal. The licenses are issued with the above 9 conditions, amending #4 on the retaining wall to the alternate suggestion by the applicant. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Charon moved and Paulsen seconded a motion instructing the City Attorney to prepare an Evacuation Ordinance and bring it back to the Council for adoption. The vote was unanimously in fagor. Motion car- ried. .. Charon moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to authorize the issuance of the following temporary licenses to Roger & Gall Rager, dba Three Points Tavern: Pool Table Licenses, Games of Skill Licenses, Juke Box Licenses, Entertainment Permit, Restaurant License, Cigarette License. Licenses to be reviewed May 15, 1983, for renewal. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Rager asked the Council to allow him to respond to the Chief's memo of November 10, 1.983, regarding several incidents May 8, 1'984 PAYMENT OF BILLS The bills were presented for consideration. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded a motion to approve the payment of bilis as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $156,994.32, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL - DONNIE'S ON THE LAKE Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded a motion to approve the renewal of a liquor license for Donnie's on the Lake. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR NEW DUMP TRUCK The City Manager explained that we have a dump truck with over 120,000 miles and it will need to be replaced. In checking, the delivery on these dump trucks is 6 months and over behind the time they are ordered so that by the time we order it will be June and delivery would probably not be until after the 1st of next year. The specifications were presented and the bid date is suggested to be June 11, 1984. Paulsen moved and Jessen Seconded a mo~Iv,, co approve the bid specifications' for a new dump truck as submitted and authorize the advertisment fz, oids which are to be opened June 11, 1984, at 10:00 A,M, The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. BOB JOHNSON EMPLOYMENT.CONTRACT Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT WITH BOB JOHNSON The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. THREE POINTS TAVERN (NOW THE'-LIGHTHOUSE) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The City Manager reported that only 2 of the 9 items that conditioned his license renewals, for six months or until May 15, 1984, have been completed since November 15, 1983. The Building Inspector wrote to Mr. Rager on March 29, 1984, asking what his plans were as to complying with the conditions. She reported that Mr. Rager thought since he wasn't serving beer anymore and was using the facility strictly for a restaurant, that he did not have to comply. He was informed he still needs a conditional use permit to operate his restaurant in a residential area. The %ouncil discussed the possibility of revoking his licenses which are: May 8, 1984 cigarette, restaurant, games of skill and pool tables. Charon moved and Jessen seconded a motion to refer this item back to the Staff to get together the necessary facts for a due process hearing on Mr. Rager's licenses and contact Mr. Rager to see if he can get the conditions complied with by the next meeting. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COUNTY ROAD 15 STREET LIGHT REPAI~ The City Manager explained that only 1 of the 8 old street lights on County Road 15 is working properly. All Star Electric has submitted a proposal to fix these lights at an estimated cost of $4,000. They have already put 9 hours into checking out the lights to determine what is wrong with each one. Councilmember Paulsen asked the City Attorney if we needed two quotations. He responded yes, if at all possible. Councilmember Peterson asked if we could get a quotation which would quote an hourly rate. After discussion the Council asked the City Manager to obtain another quotation and try to get an hourly rate. INFORMATIOn/MISCELLANEOUS A. Action Alert - League of Minnesota Cities - April 27, 1984 B. SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY MEMO REGARDING MWCC The Council discussed this memo and decided to support the independent management study of the MWCC. Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~84-72 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING INDEPEnDEnT MANAGEMENT STUDY OF METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. C. Resignation letter from Nels Schernau. Date June 29, 1984. D. Donation acknowledgement to two people contributiing thru the Park Commission's Gift Catalog. Mrs. Dunn and Mr. & Mrs. Charles Howe. E. LMCD Resolution regarding Landfill Site F. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Preliminary Policy LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION 6820E Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430, (612) 566-0050 May 31, 1984 Mr. Jon Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Jon: In 1976, LOGIS members adopted a change in by-laws to permit cities to join LOGIS without the requirement for "buying in" to all accumulated Class 2 software investment. The intent was to reduce the barriers to admission. The mechanism adopted was creation of membership categories of Operating Associate and Franchise Associate. Candidate members were informed that as Associate members they would have no buy-in charges, and all fees would be the same as for full members. However, Operating Associate members would not have an "official" vote on the Board of Directors, and would not be eligible to serve on the Executive Committee. Fifteen members have joined LOGIS in this manner to supplement the previous twelve. Although there have been no objections raised by the Operating Associate Members, the inevitable result of an" ex officio" status is a low level of involvement and perhaps a sense of being treated somewhat as a "poor relation". Accordingly, members have sought a way to remove this barrier to full participation. After reviewing the governing documents and obtaining legal counsel, it has been determined that policies can be modified to permit an upgrade in membership by all but the newest members simply by request of the member. The upgrade is based on the fact that your city has invested $14,300 to-date in the consortium's software development fund, and this amount exceeds the price as currently calculated to "buy in" to the software assets of LOGIS. Thus, your city is now eligible for full membership status. To upgrade your membership, please do the following: Present a resolution similar to the one enclosed to your City Council for action (also enclosed is a suggested memo explaining the matter to the Council). I will be calling you in a few days to discuss this matters. Send a copy of the adopted resolution to LOGIS. The matter will be presented at the next Board of Directors meeting for a vote of the LOGIS membership. and related Since r~y, Ted ~L. Willard Executive Director TLW/sp Encl. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN UPGRADE OF MEMBERSHIP FROM ASSOCIATE TO FULL MEMBERSHIP WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound ticipation in LOGIS as Associate Member; and, authorized par- WHEREAS, the City requested Associate Membership status to avoid the unnecessary cost of matching prior member investments in LOGIS to attain full status; and, WHEREAS, the City was admitted to LOGIS as an Associate Member on October 26, 1977; and WHEREAS, recent changes to LOGIS policies permit Associate Members to upgrade to full membership status with no change in cost or liability to the City; and, WHEREAS, such a change would be advantageous to the City by permitting a strengthened vote in the affairs of LOGIS in the form of a full vote on the Board of Directors and eligibility for the City's representative to serve on the LOGIS Executive Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound that it requests a change from its membership in LOGIS from Associate to Full Member status. MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: City Manager RE: UPGRADE OF MEMBERSHIP IN LOGIS Background The City joined LOGIS in 1977 as an Operating Associate Member. This membership category permitted us to participate in the system without "buying in" to previous software development. However, this membership category does not give us a full vote on the Board of Directors. We have now been a member long enough so that our annual contribution to the system's development and improvement fund has, in effect, paid for full membership status. All that is needed to receive full membership status is to accept the upgrade. The change will not affect our present or future obligations or commitments to LOGIS. It simply gives us a stronger voice in the affairs of the consortium. Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution upgrade of membership in LOGIS be adopted. requesting an 4 PROPOSED RESOLUTION RESOLUTION TO NULLIFY FORMER RESOLUTION #83-137 - 5226 LYNWOOD BLVD., AND RESOLUTION #83-144 - 4424 DENBIGH ROAD AND AUTHOIZE REFUND OF FEES WHEREAS, Staff has received variance requests for the above described properties known as PID #19-117-23 24 0026 and PIR #13-117-24 32 0017 and processed them under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance Section 23.403 which states 'IA lot or record in a residential district may be used for single-family detached dwelling purposes provided the area thereof meets all setback and minimum lot area requirements of this Ordinance, provided: (1) it has frontage on an improve public right-of-way...", and WHEREAS, due to interpretation of the ordinance for existing structures on these non-conforming lots, it was found that they did not require variance approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does agree to make null and void, Resolution #83-144 for Mr. Robert Olson, on property described as "Lot 91 and that tract of land lying bet. Black Lake and the Nly line of Lot 91, Phelps' Island Park First Division"; and Resolution #83-137 for Mr. Hilary Hortsch, on property described as "N. 8 ft. of Lot 20 and S. 46 ft. of Lot 21, Block 2, Abraham Lincoln Addition to. Mound". Furthermore, the City Council does authorize the necessary fee refunds to the applicants. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jon Elam, City Manager Jan Bertrand, Building Official May 23, 1984 23.403 Existing Lots of Record Due to the recent interpretation of the existing "Lots of Record" off of the north of Lynwood Boulevard by the City Attorney, I feel I would like you to refund two (2) former variances and void their variance applications and resolutions. One (1) is off of the north of Lynwood Boulevard and Morton Lane, Metes and Bounds Description, Block 1 and 2, Rearrangement of Block 10, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park (PID 13-117-24 32 OO17) - Resolution 83-137. One is off of the east end of Denbigh Road, 4424 Denbigh Road, Mr. Robert Olson, legal description is Lot 91 and that tract of land lying between Black Lake and the Northerly line of Lot 91, Phelps' Island Park First Division (PID 19-117-23 24 0026) - Resolution 83-144. (Copies of applications and resolutions are attached.) In the future, I will need a survey of the property and establish Zoning Ordinance setbacks to the required front yard from the private easements described in their deeds, which will need to be shown on the property survey. If this meets with your approval, let me know. I also need to mention that I will continue not to issue any building permits on vacant .lots which do not abut on an improved public right-of-way. OB/ms ~~~ REFUND AMOUNTS: $35.00 to Mr. Robert Olson, 4424 Denbigh Road $35.00 to Mr. Hil~ry Hortsch, 5226 Lynwood Blvd. $7O.OO CASF- NO. 83-Zzi5 Fee Pa i d Z~ 6"'"/-~ CITY O~F MOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & .ZONING COMMISSION ~-OF-MOUND (Please type the following information) 2. Legal Description of Property: Lot C~ I & that tract of land .lyin'gBlock /~, ~ ~ - ~ -- . ^~ ~ between Black 1 Addit.i, on ~'"J~~j,(~_~J~_ .~__~] i~'.&~,J'~)u~).PID NOLake 9-117-23 24 0026 4. Applleant (If other than owner): Name Day Phone No. Date Filed.'-~-,,~2-~-~ Address 5. Type of Request: /(~) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Amendment ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Sign Permit ( ) Wetl'and Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( )*Other ,*If other, specify: Present Zoning District ~ Existing USe(s)of Property ,~. ~/ ~/~?~ ~/--f_~~. _ / Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or · other zoning procedure for this property? ./~ If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, actidn taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of i~specting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may b~ required/b~]law~/~// // //~1//~ /3 ~-. , . Signature of Applicant~~3~~~~~~ _. Date Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve the variance so the accessory building requested can be constructed with conditions. Date 8-9-83 Cuuncil Action: Concur with the Planning .Commission Recommendation Resolution No.83-144 to approve variance ~or a nonconforming lot to construct ~ detached accessory building. Da t ~ ' 8 - 2 3 - 8 3/~C'~ D. Loca't.i°n of: Signs, easements~ underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North Compass direction A~ addit'ional i'nformation as may reasonably be required by the City Staff' an~ applicable Sections of the Zoning O.rdinanee. Ill. Request for a Zoning Variance A. All..i~formation below, a site plan, as descr'ibed in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing.will be scheduled. B.. Does.the present use of. the property·conform to ~1.1 use regulations for the zone district in which it is located?. Yes'~(y) No ( )'~ If !'no", specify each n~n?conforming use: C.. Do .the existing.structures comply with all area height and bulk.regulations for the zone district~in'which i't'is'.located? Yes (//~") ' No ' ( ) If !'no", specify ~ach non-conforming' use: ...... D. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent~its ~' reasonable use for ~ny of the.uses~permitted in that zoning~district? ( ) .Too narrow (.) Topography (') Soil ( ) Too. small ' ~. .( )' Drainage .... ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow -~ ) Shape ~ ~ (~(~) Other, Specify: E..Was .the hardship described above' created by the action of anyone havi.ng pcoperty interests in the land after 'the Zohing Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (/~) If yes, expl'ain: Was the hardship created by"any'o{her man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (~)~) If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for'Which:you request a variance peculiar~ only to the property described'in this petition?· Yes ( )' ~o ~ If no, how many other Properties are similarly affected? What is the "minimum'l modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? August. 23, 1983 RESOLUTION NO. 83-144 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WIYH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FOR A NONCONFORMING LOT TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING ON LOT 91, PHELPS ISLAND PARK 1ST DIVISION PID #~9-117-23 24 0026 (4424 DEBIGH ROAD) WHEREAS, Mr. Olson, the owner of property.described as Lot 91, Phelps Island Park 1st Division, PI]) #19-117-23 24 0026, has applied for a variance on a nonconforming lot to allow for the construction of a.24 foot by 24 foot'detached accessory building; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires Section 23.403 - Lots of record id residential districts may be used for single family detached dwelling purposes provided.it has frontage on an improved, public right-of-way; and kS{EREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the appliqation and does recommend approval of the variance to allow the homeowner reasonable use of his property with certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby concur with the Planning Commission recom- mendation, to approve the variance as described for 4424 Denbigh Road (Lot 91,"Phelps Island Park 1st Divisfon - PID #19-117-23 24 0026), upon the condition that the detached garage have a setback to be the average of the present neighbors garages; a survey be submitted indicating the underground utilities, private road and utility easements, and present and proposed buildings be shown; the accessory building be limited to.garage and storage. //ne foregoing resolution was moved by .Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Paulsen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Attest: City Clerk CiTY OF HOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION : OF MOUND (Piease t pe the following ;nformation) Street Address or'Property Legal'Description of Property: Lot~l~ Addition ~ Address ~G Appl. icant (if other than owner.): Date Fi led ~J~? I~_,lc~ Name - :: Day Phone No. -Address 5. Type. of Request: (~.)' Variance ( ) Conditional Nse Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. - ( ) Amendment ( ~ Sign Permit ( )*Other *I'~ other, specify: ' .. resent Zoning'Distr.ict ]'~" '- .Existing Use(s). of Property .'~,i)~M'i':l~'L. -~,,qC~:: ~HI~-)~ Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or o~her, zoning procedure for this property? /~ If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. ! certify that all'of the above statements and the statements contained In any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. or upon the premises described in .~his applicaSJon by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the' purpose of inspect'i~g, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required/b~ law'//~ d Planning Commission Recommendation: To gradt the variance requested. Date CoJncil Action: Concur with the Planning Commission & approve. Date 7-25-~ Re~olution No. 83-137 Date 8-9-83 uest' :or Lo~, ~nce .Procedure (2). Case # D. L0ca'tion of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. .Indicate North compass direction : .~ F. A~y additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and'applicable Sections.of tSe Zoning 0.rdinance. ~ ~ : III. Request for a Zoning Variance A. All.,i~formation below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hea~ing.will be scheduled. Does.the present use of the property'conform to. all use'regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes (~') No ( )' If "no", specify each nbn-conforming use'. Do .the existing structures comply with all area height and bulk.regulations for the zone district'in'which i't is.located? Yes (¥.) No ' ( ) .. If ."no", specify each non-conforming use: D.. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for. any .of the.uses.permitted in that zoning.district? ( ) .Too 0arrow (~) Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too. small '. ( )' Drainage.. ( ) Sub-surface ( .) Too shallow- (._) ShaPe , : (y) Other: Specify: E. ,Was .the hardship described above 'create8 by the a~tion of anyone havi.ng property interests in the land afte~ 'the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (y) I~ yes, explain: ' F. Was the hardship created by'any'other man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes (7() No ( ) If yes, explain: G. ''Are the conditions of hardship for'which:you request a v,a~iance pecul, iar only to the prope/ty~described in this petition? Yes (~(') No ( ) If no, how many otherlproperti.es are similarly affected H..What is the "minimum",,modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that wi, ll permit.you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and writ,t~n explanatioc~ sheets~'"i"f"necessary.) -~P-~IC~P~m-/_~OF_ ~ Attach additional ~by, ~, IqS] Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? August 9, 1983 RESOLUTION NO. 83-137 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE $IRUCTURAL EXPANSION ON A NONCONFORMING LOT FOR PID ~13-117-24 32 0017 IN BLOCKS 1 ~D 2, REARRANGEMENT OF BLOCK 10, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK (5226 LYNWOOD BLVD.) WHEREAS, 'Hilary Hortsch, the o~ner of property described as Part of Blocks 1 and 2, Rearrangement of Block 10, Abraham Lincoln Additi'on to Lakeside Park, PID (~13-117-24 32 U017, has applied for a variance on a non- conforming lot which does not front on an improved public right-of-way to allow th&' construction of a second story over an existing garage foundation and to do structural founda'tion repairs to his existing house wall; and k~EREAS, Section 23'1403 of the City Code requires - "Lots of record in residential districts may be used for single family detached dwelling purposes provided it has frontage on an improved public right-of- way", and Section 23.408.7 requires the principal structure be 50 feet or more from the Mean High Water Line when the property-abuts the lake; and k~ERE~, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and does recc~mend approval of the variance to allow the homeowner' reasonable use of his property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby concur with the Planning Commission reco- mmendation to approve the variance as described above for 5226 Lynwood 'Blvd., PID #13-117- 24 32 0017, Part of Blocks 1 and 2, Rearrangement of Block 10, Abraham Lincoln Addition to'Lakeside Park. The foregoing resolution was moved by Mayor Polston and seconded · 'by Councilmember ?eterson. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Attest: City Clerk DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Ay. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 l~y 30~ 1984 FROM: Those Lis~ed Below Dennis L. H~nsen Hennepin County Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Temporary Closure of CSAH 125 at the Bridge Between Black Lake and Spring Park Bay. . On Monday June 4, 1984, CSAH 125 (Interlachen Rd.) will be closed for reconstruction of the bridge between Black Lake and Spring Park Bay. A marked detour will be provided via CSAH 15 and Wilshire Boulevard. The temporary closure will be in effect approxi~~ DLH/JMD :de : ~ennepin County Board of Commissioners Bureau of Public Service-A. J.Lee Transportation Staff Sheriff' s Department Sheriff's Radio Tower Library Director-Robert Rohlf Minnesota Dept. of Transportation District 5 Engineer-Wm. Crawford District 5 Traffic Engineer-Joel Katz Road Information & Permit Office Minnesota Highway Patrol East Minnesota Highway Patrol West Municipalities City of Mound Leonard L. Koppy, City Manager Lyle Swanson, City Engineer Fire Chief Police Chief City of Spring Park City Administrator Police Chief Fire Chief School District 277 - Westonka Superintendent Transportation Director Emergency Service Methodist Hospital-Emergency North Memorial Medical Center- Emergency Smith Ambulance Waconia Ridgeview Hospital Ambulance Service Mid, est Med Kab Ken Eskedahl, Hennepin County Medical Center Mpis. Star and Tribune, Editor Sun Newspapers, Editor Post Publishing, Editor The Laker ~adio Stations? KDWB, KRSI, WWTC, KSTP, WCCO, WDGY, KQRS Metropolitan Traffic Control John Lundell ~erican Automobile Association Ken Mohr, Domestic Travel MTC Transit Operating Division Glen Peterson, Mgr. St. Operations Superintendent HENNEPIN COUNTY R~GMTON LA;,E o 0 C c ~ INTERLAC;HEN /' ROAD Air Comm Allstar Electric Acro-MN Blackowiak & Son Holly Bostrom Bury & Carlson Donald Bryce Butch's Bar Supply Ronald Bostrom Bradley Exterminating 'Bowman Distribution Janet Bertrand Conway Fire & Safety Coca Cola C~ty Club Distributing City Wide Services Cash Register Sales Copy Duplicating Prod Chapin Publishing Robert Cheney Century Auto Body Dependable Services Duane's 66 Service Day Distributing East Side Beverage Jon E 1 am First Bank Mpls Flowers By Helen Griggs Beer General Safety Equip Gager, I nc Henn Co. Treas Henn Co. Sheriff Dept Herc-U-Li ft, Inc. Illies & Sons Internatl City Mgmt Assn Kromer Co. Kool Kube Ice Kelly Services Lowells Auto Parts The Laker Lutz Tree Service Metro Fire Equip Marina Auto Supply Mound Fire Dept Mound Super Valu Wm Mueller & Sons City of Mound Metro Fone Communications Mpls Star & Trib Navarre Hdwe Northern States Power North Star Waterworks Mi nnetonka Refrig Metro Waste Control Linda Nelson Robert Olson 162.60 273 61 333 58 95 50 326 OO 489 60 1OO 00 294 40 6 50 19 OO 193.85 143.75 31.89 402.97 5,972.15 10.75 131.59 15.OO 94.49 367.O0 3O.OO 33.00 42.o0 4,59o. 30 4,523.70 32.47 4oo.oo 20.OO 1,970.60 1,711.35 106.38 1,841 .OO 137.10 56.14 4,8OO.OO 27.9o 82.40 175.80 497.35 44. OO 316.78 3,945.00 8,493.00 584.14 4,584.15 42.66 2,209. lo 24.00 23.60 7~ .4O 193.22 4,460.96 142.74 75.5o 29,986.80 50. OO 35. oo Mound Postmaster A.J. Ogle Pepsi Cola/7 Up Pogreba Distributing Pitney Bowes Credit Royal Crown Beverage Reo Raj Kennels Real One Acquisition Satellite Industries Nels Schernau Shepherds Rental Rugs Spring Park Car Wash Sterne Electric The Sun Newspaper Seton Name Plate Corp Soil Exploration Suburban Ti re J.L. Shiely Co. Solidification Inc Twin City Home Juice Thrifty Snyder 0rug Thurk Bros. Chev Thorpe Distrib. Univ of MN Unitog Rentals Van Doren, Hazard, Stallngs Waconia Ridgeview Hosp Western Tree Serv. Water Products Co. Widmer Bros. Warner Hdwe Wallin Heat lng Williams Cabinets Xerox, Inc. R.L. Youngdahl Marlys Annis Commiss of Revenue Consolidated Micrograph Bill Clark Joseph Dutton Dock Refunds Judy Fisher Fi remen-Conference Engle Fabrication Griggs Cooper Steve Grand House of Moy Henn Co. Treas Hilary Hortsch Gerald Henke House of Moy Steven Henthorne Johnson Bros. Liq Robert E. Johnson Robert E. Johnson Delbert Rudolph Delbert Rudolph Ed Phillips & Sons 100. OO 706.32 661.90 383.25 4,582.4O 26.00 264.55 463.0O 7O8.O5 549.16 8.14 21.45 109.00 164.02 13.00 411.24 9OO.OO 79.14 125.35 288.00 52.50 15.99 32.37 4,716.55 225.00 328.59 1,049.5O 94.30 1,535.50 .189.o8 978.72 122.o8 34.54 1,53o.o0 219.04 4,97~ .o0 50 00 4,438 97 3 96 1 ,686 67 67 33 150 00 35.00 2,380.00 14,148.00 4,276.02 6.00 47.00 5.00 35.O0 8.38 28.62 22.25 4,702.27 692.38 621.86 247.5O 246.57 2,934.62 BILLS----June 12, 1~84 (cont) Quali~y Wine Howard Simar Nels Schernau Thurk Bros. Chevrolet Bruce Wold 2,246.62 555.00 23.65 7,30O. O0 290.OO TOTAL BILLS 159,731.17 June 12, 1984 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER The County has now begun to notify adjacent property owners that they will be conducting "private sales" on some of the tax forfeit lots we have reconveyed back to the County for that purpose. With any good plan though, there is always a problem. In the first case (PID #19-117-23 33 0139), the value placed on the property by the Assessor is $500. The cost of the assessments since forfeiture ($2,191.86) is added to the $500 making the final cost approximately $2700.00. The abutting property owners are interested in this property even at $2700. The problem is that there are three older assessments from before forfeiture totaling $4,145.38. We don't want to cancel these assessments before :the sale because we wi.ll get 80% of the $500 the County receives from the sale toward these assessments. We could then legally reassess this property for the balance of the old assessments. The property owners won't buy the property with the prospect of all these added assessments. Thus, the policy question is! Do we want to make a committment to the people intending to purchase the property that we will cancel the balance of the older assessments after they buy the lot. Please understand that the majority of these lots are definitely not worth all the extra assessments. Our goal thus far has been to get the property back on the tax role and help a number of people make their property conforming. This questiOn has come up two or three times and some clear direction would prove useful for us to tell potential buyers what our position is. JE:fc CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 PRESS RELEASE It seems as if Mound and all 472 phone exchanges may have lost out again. Everyone realizes by now that the Continental Phone Company increased their rates last year from $21.90'to $28.30 for residential service. Last month the State Public Utilities Commission handed down their decision on these rates and set them at $24.45 per month. From July 26, 1983 to June 28, 1984, every one of Mound's estimated 5,000 customers overpaid their phone bill by $3.85 per month. For the eleven month period, this overpayment totaled $42.35 for each residential customer. It would be expected that Mound customers would receive a credit of $42.35 on their future phone bill. Unfortunately, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission did not set it that way. They voted to refund everyone in the entire Continental Phone System the same refund even though, individual exchange rates vary. In fact, in some cases, people will get a refund even when the final rates increased over the interim rates. Worst of all the actual refund each customer in Mound will receive is $.73 per month. A total of $8.03 instead of the actual credit due of $42.35. This difference is $34.32 per customer and will amount to a total dollar loss of $171,6OO for Mound customers. The City Council feels that this redistribution of Mound resident's income t° other Continental customers is very unfair and has filed an appeal on the P.U.C. decision to force them to look at the inequity of their decision. A. THoMAs WURST, P.A. CURTIS A. PEARSON, PA. JOSEPH Ir. HAMILTON, P.A. JANE5 D. LARSON, J?A. THOMAS ~ UNDERWOOD~ fa. ROGE~ J. FELLOWS LAW OFFICES WURST, PEARSON, HAMILTON, LARSON & UNDERWOOD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 June 8, 1984 TELEPHONE (61;~) 338-4200 Mr. Jon Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341 _Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Continental Telephone Refund Dear Jon: It seems that Mound has lost again in the Continental Telephone saga, this time at the hands of the Public Utilities Commission. I received a copy of a June 5 Commission Order directing Continental to refund to every customer at an equal percentage of the interim billing amounts. Sounds fair on its face, doesn't it. Let me review the facts. Continental requested a $6.8 million increase, put a $4.7 million increase into effect on 7-26-83, and was allowed a $4.0 million annual increase by the Commission in Mar.ch, 1984. Mound was paying $21.90 for residential service. On an interim basis, Mound residential customers were paying $28.30 per month. Final rates have been approved for Mound at $24.45 per month. During the period of interim rates, Mound customers are paying $3.85 per month over final rates. Other customers in outstate areas paid interim rates that were lower than final rates. In other words, there are customers who were overpaying during interim rates (Metro class including Mound) and customers who were underpaying (most outstate customers). The patently unfair aspect of the PUC Order is that all customers, whether they overpayed or underpayed on an interim basis, will get an equal refund. Obviously, if Mound customers were to get back what they overpayed, they would get back $3.85 per month for each of the 11 months of overpayment (July 26, 1983 through June 28, 1984). ~nat would be a total refund of about $42.35 for each residential customer. WURST, PEARSON, HAMILTON, LARSON & UNDERWOOD Mr. Jon Elam June 8, 1984 Page 2 In actuality, what the PUC has ordered is a refund as I' calculate it of $0.73 per month for each Mound customer, or a total refund of $8.03. The difference of $34.32 per customer (assuming 5,000 Mound customers) amounts to a total dollar loss of $171,600 for the citizens of Mound. The Commission has adopted a refunding policy of refunding the same percentage to everyone, whether or not they overpayed during the period of interim rates. They have also applied this refunding policy to the Peoples Gas refund, ordered in April of 1984. The taconite companies were adversely affected by the policy and have started an appeal in the Court of Appeals. My recommendation, given the magnitude of the error in this case, would be to perfect an appeal (within 30 days of 6-5-84), and wait to see whether the taconites prevail. Mound actually has a better case for reasons I will not outline here. I should add that the other four Metro cities would have precisely the same complaint. Let me know soon what your wishes are as some of the 30 days have already slipp, ed away. Very truly yours, James D. Larson/c JDL:cnm TO: BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Leo G. Adams Harry Sey~nour Crump Roger L. Hanson Terry Hoffman Cynthia A. Kitlinski Chairman Con~nissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Mr. Douglas Morton Continental Telephone Company 3500 West 80th Street, Suite 500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 Service Date: .JUI~ 5 ~9~4 Docket No.: P-407/GR-83-294 In the matter of the proposed notice explaining final rates submitteU in compliance with ordering paragraph number 4 of the Commission's March 23, 1984 Order in Docket No. P-407/GR-83-294. The above entitled matter has been considered by the Commission and the following disposition made: APPROVED, as attached. The Company shall include a copy of the approved notice with the first bill issued to each customer after the effective date of the final approved rates. BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION ~~ Young I Executive Secretary NOTICE OF APPROVED P, ATES The Minnesota Public Uti~itie~ Commission recently issued its decision on Contel's rate increase proposal which has been pending since May 1983. l'ne new rates are effective with the enclosed bill. In May 1983, Contel proposed a $7.2 million increase in annual local service revenues. The Company later lowered its request to $6.8 million. On July 26, 1983, the Company began collecting $4.7 million of its requested increase with the understanding that if the Con;nission ultimately authorized a lesser increase, the difference would be subject to refund with interest. The Commission approved $4.0 million of our original request in March 1984. Part of the authorized revenue increase will be obtained from increasing the coin telephone rate from lO~ to 25~; another small part will be gained from increases in service charges. The largest portion will result from increases in basic local access line rates. Effective with this change in rates, all customers in outstate Minnesota exchanges will pay a uniform basic access line rate {exclusive of EAS charges}, and all customers hiving toll-free access {Extended Area Service} to the Twin Cities metropolitan area will pay a uniform rate. Because the Comnission ordered consolidati°n of our former two outstate rate groups into one, some customers will see a slight increase from the interim level of rates, and others will experience a decrease. The interim rates you and Contel's other customers have been paying were determined by increasing the prior approved rates by the same percentage. The amount Contel during the interim rate period will be returned t~F~ overcol lected at an equal percentage of the interim period billing amounts. Minnesota law requires that new approved rates be applied to future billing periods only, and not used for calculating individual customer refunds. Your refund, including interest, will appear as a credit on a future bill. The approved rates and charges appear on the inside of this notice. If you have any questions about the enclosed bill, please contact your local Contel business office. CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, INC. May 31, 1984 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER, S.,/ Enclosed is the response from Herb Klossner on my letter written following our recent crosswalk accident. I have read and re-read the letter and am just as confused on how to respond as I was.the time before. The gist of the letter, it seems to me, is that the County isn't required to sign or paint crosswalks and enforcement is a local problem (as is the painting). What we have is what we get unless the City Council wants to install flashing lights (which we can approve, because we will pay for them). Finally, I should apologize to Dennis Hanson. gather from this? If otherwise, let me know. Is this what you I'll put in on the next Agenda for discussion and direction, if that's O.K. JE: fc enc. HEiNE I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minn( sota 55343 935-3381 22 May 1984 Mr. Jon Elam, Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Elam: Within the reconstructed segment of CSAH 110 (Commerce Blvd) in the City of Mound, painted crosswalks have been established at eight separate locations. These are at Three Points Boulevard, Balsam Road, the Library entrance, Church Street, in front of the Ben Franklin store, CSAH 15 (south junction), one half block south of CSAH 15, and the Surfside entrance. Pedestrian crossing signs with 45o down arrows have been placed for both northbound and southbound traffic at the crosswalks at the Library entrance, in front of the Ben Franklin store, and one half block south of CSAH 15. Advance pedestrian signs are in place at the Three Points Boulevard crosswalk. In addition, pedestrian crossing signs with an advisory plaque stating "Pedestrian Crossings Ahead" have been placed bracketing the commercial area on CSAH 110. These signs are located about 150 feet south of Grand View Drive for southbound traffic and about one block south of CSAH 15 (just south of the shoe store) for northbound traffic. This crosswalk marking and signing scheme was agreed upon and implemented after two separate meetings and field observations attended by former Police Chief Bruce Wold, and Wayne Matsumoto and Brad Larson of our staff. These meetings took place in the fall of 1981 and spring of 1982. Since that time, our records do not indicate any correspondence from the city concerning discontent, on the ci.~y~s part, with the crosswalk painting or signing on CSAH 110. Neither the law, nor the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, demand that "every" potential pedestrian crossing location be signed nor even painted. This decision is at the discretion of the local jurisdiction. Hennepin County policy has long been to permit the local community to decide where painted crosswalks are appropriate and to delegate the maintenance of the painted crosswalks to the community. The county will, at the request of the community, make the initial installation to set the appropriate and legal pattern. Upkeep is then the obligation of the community. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer Jon Elam 22 May 1984 Page Two At the House of Moy on CSAH 15, pedestrian crossing signs and 45o down arrows were installed for both directions of traffic sometime ago. Our crews noted last week that the sign for westbound traffic had been cut off at the sidewalk line as the post stub was all that was evident. This sign will be replaced as soon as possible. The question of pedestrian safety at the CSAH 15/CSAH 110 signalized intersection has long been discussed. These discussions predate, by a considerable margin, the recent reconstruction project. I recall having the intersection studied at least twice at the request of former City Manager Leonard Kopp. From our perspective, there appears to be two problem areas of concern in crossing pedestrians at this intersection. First is a misunderstanding of the operation of the WALK-DONT WALK indications. This is not uncommon among pedestrians and for this purpose, our department prepared the attached statement of explanation. This explanation, in a condensed version is available on decals which may be placed on the signal pole itself for the pedestrian edification. These will be placed on the poles at the CSAH 15 and CSAH 110 as soon as work schedules permit. The second problem noted is that westbound left turning vehicles tend to take over the intersection at times, abusing the pedestrian rights in the south crosswalk. Under these conditions, the turning vehicle must, by law, yield to the pedestrian crossing with the WALK indication. This conflict has been observed to occur in the late afternoon when industries in the area release their employees. Enforcement of pedestrian rights, in this situation, would go a long way in solving the problem. We are of the opinion that conditions do not warrant an exclusive pedestrian phase at this intersection as suggested in your letter. Flashing amber lights at the Ben Franklin store, the former high school, and House of Moy crosswalks could be considered upon official request from the Mound City Council. The close proximity of these crossings to the traffic signal at CSAH 15/CSAH 110 and to the railroad signal may preclude their use, however, because of potential conflicting commands of the two devices. You may recall that the county proposed to install a median safety island in conjunction with the CSAH 110 project to provide pedestrian refuge on CSAH 110 at the Ben Franklin crosswalk. However, this proposal was rejected by the city council. Jon, the goals of the city and the county are the same; that is, to provide a safe and efficient roadway facility for all, whether it be the motorist, the pedestrian, or the cyclist. I am disappointed that you have chosen to castigate Dennis Hansen in public. ~Hennepin County has established an enviable traffic safety record and has consistently, over the years, been awarded the Minnesota Safety Council's Jon Elam 22 May 1984 Page three Outstanding Achievement Award in recognition of that record. This would not have been possible without Dennis Hansen's involvement with communities such as yours to solve traffic and safety problems. Dennis is a very competent Professional Traffic Engineer and deserves an apology for your statement concerning his character. As always, we would be most happy to meet with you to discuss the problem that now exists and explore possible solutions. Please contact me to arrange such a meeting. Very truly yours, Director HOK:de Attachment CC: Commissioner E. F. Robb, Jr. A. J. Lee D. L. Hansen TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION AT THE CSAH 15 & CSAH 110 INTERSECTION The City of Mound and area residents have inquired or expressed concern as to the operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of CSAH 15 and CSAH 110. Of particular concern, has been the function of the pedestrian crossing indications - the WALK - DON'T WALK signals. From the pedestrian's aspect, it may be advantageous to examine each pedestrian indication by outlining exactly what each displayed command represents and by explaining how the pedestrian attempting to cross the street is expected to react. First of all, as you are probably aware, the intersection is equipped with pedestrian push buttons. The appropriate push button must be pressed in order to obtain the desired WALK indication. If the button is not pressed, the signal controller will omit the WALK phase and the WALK indication will not appear. After the appropriate button is pressed, it may take up to 30 seconds or more before your WALK indication appears. This is because the signal may be operating in another phase at the time of button actuation and must complete that phase prior to responding to your command. Following is a brief description of each pedestrian indication: WALK: You may leave the curb and begin to walk with caution in the direction of this signal. FLASHING DONIT WALK: If you are crossing the street when the DON'T WALK begins to flash, you may continue to cross at a normal pace to the opposite curb. If you have not yet started to cross, do not enter the street; stay at the curb, press the appropriate pedestrian signal button, and wait for the next WALK indication to appear. DON'T WALK (Steady Signal): Do not enter the street in the direction of this signal. Again, press the appropriate button and wait for the WALK indication. Crossing times in all four crosswalks at this intersection have been established as follows: The WALK indications are displayed for 15 seconds and the DON'T WALK flashing times are set at 14 seconds. The DON'T WALK flash is followed by an amber vehicle clearance interval of 3.5 seconds. This affords the pedestrian with a minimum of 15 seconds + 14 seconds + 3.5 seconds = 32.5 seconds to cross the street in the crosswalks prior to the release of conflicting traffic. This timing is substantially longer than at other intersections and allows the pedestrian ample time to reach the far curb even at a relatively slow walking pace. Should there be any questions or further concerns about this matter, please call the Traffic Division at 935-3381. 19 P L A N N I N G P R A C T I C E Hatching Small Businesses Business incubators are a hot topic in local economic development circles. Here are some of the conclusions from a recent survey of some 50 incubators. By Candace Campbell Small, homegrown bus~esses are becoming the focus of local economic develop- ment efforts. Whether the nun'xtring party is a city agency, a chamber of commerce, a private corporation, or a community group, the recipient is often an indigenous, fledging business rather than an established business recruited from elsewhere. What a start-up business often receives is space in a 'business incubator,' a building that offers low rent, centralized services, flexible leases, and management advice-- thereby acting as a hatchery for new businesses and new jobs. In the past year we have studied several dozen of these business incubators around the country. Most of them are publicly owned or operated, and half of the total have been in operation less than a year. Most incubators arose from a collaboration between local government, universities, and private corporations. Georgia Tech's Advanced Technology Development Center occupies a nero buildin8 (right]. More typical is the Fulton-Carroll Center for Industry in Chica8ol in three old warehouses. Financing Almost all of the incubators began in existing, often vacant, buildings--including of- fice buildings, warehouses, schools, post offices, shopping centers, and storefronts. The Akron, Ohio, office of economic development found its incubator building, an old warehouse, after surveying 26 vacant and underused buildings. In several other cities, abandoned factories have been donated as incubator sites. The purchase and rehabilitation of these structures have been funded by a variety of government loans and grants, including such sources as: the federal Economic Develop- ment Administration, the Appalachian Regional Commission, Urban Development Ac- tion Grants, and Community Development Block Grants. Some have been paid for by state or locally issued industrial revenue bonds. A few resulted from the donation or bargain sale of buildings and property by private corporations. In several of the incubator projects we surveyed, Emergency Jobs Bill and Job Train- ing Partnership Act funds were used to provide labor to rehabilitate the buildings. In other cities, low-interest renovation loans are available to tenants. We have found that business incubators are like mother hens. They want their chicks to hatch, grow, and leave the nest. After a few years, successful new businesses are asked to pay market-rate rent or to leave the incubator building to make room for others. These incubators are set up so that it is easier to leave the nest than enter it. Business plans are screened, and potential tenants often must be interviewed by seasoned business peo- ple before being accepted. The industrial incubator develol~d by the city of Akron, Summit County, and the University of Akron works this way. Akron's economic development office manages the facility but prospective tenants' applications are reviewed by a board with represen- tatives from the city, the county, ~,nd the Private Industry Council's job traininF gram. Applicants also are interviewed by representatives of the Small Business In, of the university's business school, the Service Corps of Retired Executives, aha the Regional Development Board. 'Each company is evaluated based on its business plan, financing, and job potential,' explains Greg Balbierz, the project manager. 'The aspiring new businesses are then given 20 PlanninS Ma)' 1984. P L A N P R A C N I N G T I C E a punch list of things to do before admittance." Balbierz views the business plan as the start-up firm's 'sweat equity--the blueprint, backbone, and foundation of the business.' Flexibility in the leasing and management of space is typical of most incubator buildings. At the Bennington County Industrial Corporation's incubator in North Ben- ~nington, Vermont, bigger operations are offered longer leases while smaller ones are often rented on a month-to-month basis. This arrangement allows the smaller firms to be relocated withln the incubator as larger firms expand. 'the larger the number of jobs at stake, the longer the lease,' says BClCs former executive director John Williamson {now head of the Springfield, Massachusetts, Economic Development Corporation}. Flexibility also means that when a business falls on hard times but the future looks promising, leases are renegotiated downward and the rent is spread out over time or deferred until cash flow picks up again. June Lavelle, director of Chicago's Fulton--Carroll Center for Industry, says, 'We're out to encoth-age people to go into business without - slaughtering them; therefore, we are very flexible.' But Lavelle and other managers of business incubators also speak of running the in- cubator itself in a businesslike fashion. Jerry Mahone, director of the Rensselaer Polytechnic Insfitute's incubator program in Troy, New York, says of the fledging en- trepreneurs, 'You must be able to hold their hands when needed and give them a push when they need pushing.' Balancing flexibility and skill in business management ap- peaxs crucial to the success of an incubator. Centralized services The centralized services available in-the incubators help to reduce the overhead costs of the new businesses located there. These services may include telephone answering, typing, copying, data processing, bookkeeping, and legal assistance. Some incubators provide computers and software specially designed for small businesses, bulk mailing equipment, WATS lines, TELEX, satellite communications, laboratories, classrooms, furniture, office equipment, libraries, conference rooms, and lunchrooms. Some of these services and facilities are included in the rent while others are offered for a fee. For example, tenants in the Control Data Corporation's Business and Technolo~/Centers may use the centers' conference rooms without charge eight hours a month. Most of the other services available in Control Data's centers are offered at market rate. In all, 432 people work for 25 companies in the Fuffon-Carroll ~cubator. Th~ center is owned by the Industrial Council of Northwest Chicago, which is trying to get the ar~a de. dgnated a~ an enterprise zone. There is some disagreement among incubator managers on the need ! vices. }une Lavelle says the Fulton-Carroll Center in Chicago developed centralized se vices only after tenants expressed a strong demand for them. 'Only the basic type 'service is important,' she adds, noting particularly phone answering and secretarial assistance. Overall, the most common comment from those involved in business incubation that ~he people are more important than the building.' Thus a close rapport the building's managers and its tenants is vital. The incubator's unique social atmosphere encourages trading relationships. falo's industrial incubator, one firm makes parts for another's assembly Similarly, Chicago's Fulton-Carroll Center has five or six tenants that buy each other. l~esident managers or msn_agement teams help with business plans, product ment, marketing, personnel, ~nd the technical aspects of the incubator's Many incubators strive to maintain a mix of new and established businesses, since best source of advice for new businesses often is other established firms. Another vantage is purely financial; the higher rents from established busin the start-ups. As with a mother hen, an incubator's organizers must have the ability to meet diverse needs of its fledgings. Says John Toon of Georgia Tech's incubator: 'It takes than a building with low rents. It takes business development people, it takes lng people, and it takes a close relationship with the companies." 21 P L A N P R A C N I N G T I C E With the exception of those that have established venture 'capital funds, most business ' incubators act as brokers between new businesses and investors. Sometimes this means simply providing introductions to lenders and venture capitalists; other times it means developing proposals and packaging loans to suit particular needs. The Georgia Tech center sponsors an annual two-day venture capital conference at which incubator tenants and others can meet Georgia investors. Baby-sitting In most locations, small businesses can take advantage of the Small Business Ad- ministration's low-interest loans through a business development center. The SBA-backed Small Business Investment Corporations {SBICs} and Minority Enterprise Small Business Investment Corporations IMESBICs} also provide equity capital in some areas. In addition, several states and local'govemments have developed small business revolving loan funds for new businesses. These local sources of financial assistance, if not offered directly by the organization that manages the incubator, are often located Within the incubator building itself. In Chester, Pennsylvania, the city's development 6ffice can provide incubator tenants and other small businesses with up to $15,000 in low-interest loans from a revolving loan fund. The development office controls disbursement of the loan by endorsing the checks to the business owner and each of its suppliers during the life of the loan. John Fitzgerald, the director of the development office, explains, 'You have to baby-sit them. These entrepreneurs have no concept of accounting. If they are in the red for r~i~e months and you find out on the tenth, it's too late. To help new businesses you hay, intrude into their business for the first few months.' This intrusion sometimes takes the form of periodic reviews, which are required ua the lease agreements. During these reviews, the progress of each firm is weighed against its business plan and job targets. If a firm fails to meet the targets, its lease can be ter- minated for cause. The Innovation Center at Ohio University in Athens negotiates an equity position in each firm along with the tenancy agreement. The center can maintain its part-ownership forever but offers the right of first refusal to the business should the cergler want to sell its shares. Public efforts Creating jobs by creating employers is the main objective of publicly sponsored business incubators. Their organization and management are centered in city economic development departments, urban renewal authorities, and regional planning and development commissions. With some exceptions, public incubators tend to shy away from high-technology tenants and toward light assembly, manufacturing, and sometimes retail and service businesses. One of the oldest publicly sponsored incubators is Buffalo's Incubator Industries Building, which was constructed by the city's urban renewal agency in 1978 with the aid of a $2.3 million Economic Development Administration grant. It offers no central- ized services, but the tenants do have acce.ss to city loans and assistance programs. More common than new construction is the conversion of existing vacant buildings. The East End Manufacturing Center in Chester, Pennsylvania, for example, is in an old knitting yarn factory, converted with the aid of S 1.3 million in EDA and Community Development Block Grant funds. St. Paul, home of two Control Data business and technology centers, has just opened its first public incubator as part of its 'Homegrown Econgmy Project.' The idea is to diver- sify the local economy by encouraging the growth of light industry, thus reducing the amount of goods and services imported from outside the city. This public incubator is unusual, by the way, because the city does not own the building. Instead, it has worked out a deal with the owner-developer of a recently renovated, 60,000-square-foot building in the Midway industrial area. In return for a city-financed low-interest mortgage, the Tenants in the North Bennington, Vermont, incubator range from a I:urnirure design school {btlow] to a company that makes coo~ware out of ~boratory be=Jeers. 22 Planoing May 1984 P L A N P R A C N I N G T I C E developer has agreed to provide incubator space and also to use his profit to renovate other property in the same area. "From the city's perspective, it's a good deal,' salts Richard Mahony, who directs the Homegrown Econo.my Project. 'We get a building rent- free, although not cost-free, and we get our money back in 10 years." Nonprofit agencies Many of the nonprofit incubators target development to a particular industrial area or neighborhood. The organizers are industrial development associations, chambers of commerce, and community organizations with broad local support and a good real estate development track record. The Bennington County IVermont} Industrial Corporation, for example, has been developing real estate since 1957. In 1978, the group bought an old mill complex, renovated it in two years at a cost of $1.2 milLion [paid for by an EDA grant and state loans}, and offered space to small businesses. The building presently houses 22 firms, ranging from a company that refashions laboratory beakers into gourmet cookware to a firm that manufactures Teflon-coated fabric {some of which was used to cover the Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis). Another tenant is a sheltered workshop for the mentally retarded, which provides lunch service for the buildings tenants. The industrial corporation's former director, John Williamson, estimates that 250 jobs have been created at the center since 1978. Another example, also mentioned above, is the Fulton-Carroll Center for Industry, o~ghwas started by the Industrial Council of Northwest Chicago in late 1980. Presently g its 340,000 square feet to 25 businesses, the center has created a net increase jobs and graduated seven firms in three years. Its director, June Lavelle, estimates that 50 percent of the jobs created are low-skilled and the rest semi-skilled. The universities While universities have long owned science and technology parks, business incubators are a newer technique for retaining prominent professors and attracting quality graduate students. The goal of most university-related incubators is to transfer basic research find- ings to the development of new products and technologies, and many university in- cubator businesses are, in fact, spin-offs of academic research projects. New firms are Begin at Home Community-based, nonprofit develop- ment organizations--experienced in creating local housing, business, and job opportunities--also may have the ideal background for creating business incubators. Incubators are usually small enough to be handled by an experienced community development organization. Moreover, developing incubators calls for precisely the same skills that most community groups already have: developing property lepressed market, obtaining subsidies ep rents low, generating community support, providing ongoing assistance to small businesses, financing, and arranging for support services. Two examples of community-initiated incubator projects illustrate this capacity: Wayne Avenue, Philadelphia. The Southwest Germantown Community Development Corporation of Philadelphia {SGCDC} began as a housing development organization, buying and renovating aban- doned buildings, and selling them to local residents. In 1981, increasingly concerned about the neighborhood's poor business climate and lack of jobs, the group began buying up empty storefronts along four blocks of Wayne Avenue, where two-thirds of the property was empty or underuscd. With the aid of a $100,000 Columbia Broadcasting System grant, SGCDC bought and rehabilitated 12 storefronts over a period of two years. The average purchase price was $7,500. Thc properties then were made available to commercial firms at Iow rents. Whenever possible, SGCDC tried to sign up businesses that either added a missing service to the area or generated jobs and street traffic. Several of the apartments above the stores were rented to the business owners or tenants. In return for the low rent and free business assistance, the businesses must agree to hire local residents "whenever commercially feasible." This means that SGCDC can terminate a lease if a business hires a nonresident when an equally qualified resident has been referred. The firms also are required to join the mer- chants association and to maintain their building's facade and abutting sidewalk. Ten entrepreneurs have opened businesses as a result of this project, half of them from thc neighborhc~od. Of the 20 people they have hirect~ 15 arc from the neighh~,'l,~t,d~ and all are Philadelphia resid,mts All I~ut ,..- ,~t Iht, ~0 l~,,,~plc who 23 lD L A N P 1R A C N I N G T I C E often specifically attracted to university incubators because they are the source of in- novations in the biomedical fields, computers, and robotics. Perhaps the oldest of the university incubators is the University City Science Center in Philadelphia. Adjacent to the campuses of the University of Pennsylvania and Drexel University, this 1.2-million-square-foot complex is owned by a consortium of 28 univer- sities, colleges, and medical schools in the Delaware Valley. Developed in a burned- out West Philadelphia neighborhood in 1963, the center now employs 6,000 people. A recent study showed that a third of the jobs required a college degree and a third an advanced degree; another third were reserved for those with a high school education or less. About a quarter of the employees are residents of the neighborhood. The corporations Private corporations establish business incubators for two reasons: the chance to make a profit and the chance to contribute to the community. For example, Control Data, which has developed its business and technology centers in some 20 cities, both in the U.S. and abroad, sells computer, library, and secretarial services. 'Control Data has made the development of new businesses part of its product line," says company represen- tative Sharon O'Flannigan. Another private-sector developer of incubators is Loren Schultz, president of Technology Genters International, Inc., who has five 'technology enterprise centers' in Operation and six in the development stage. Like other incubators described in this article, TGI offers below-market rents, .centralized services, and equipment rental in its incubator buildings. An unusual feature is TCI's "champion"--a subcontractor with extensive business experience who helps incubator firms with business plannin financing. Initial consultation is free, but follow-up assistance is on a retainer or fee Each of Schultz's centers has a locally developed venture capital fund of $3 to $5 million and the possibility of financing through TCI's larger master venture fund. One of Schultz's newest centers is in a former high school in Minneapolis two blocks from the University of Minnesota campus. This incubator is unusual in that the building will be operated as a cooperative and the mix of enterprises will include two dance com- panies, a sculpture school, and 30 to 40 high-tech firms. In Rockford, Illinois, where unemployment has hovered around 20 percent the last The SGCDC effort has not been without problems. Sales have been slow, and ar- son, vandalism, and burglary on the strip have made the marketing job more dif- ficult. There also have been two business failures in the SGCDC-owned properties, which has led the staff to be more hard- nosed about prospective tenants. Finally, there is the general problem that most retail businesses do not, as a rule, create a large number of jobs, especially in poo~: areas. This situation stimulated the SGCDC to begin its second incubator project--this one an industrial incubator. The new incubator will be in a five- building complex that is being bought by a for-profit subsidiary of SGCDC in part- nership with a local businessman. Because the prot~vrt)' v,'a~ abandoned, the bank that hchl ii was v:ilhng t() (,ffe~ a generous moN- gag.~' (,I} thc 52'14 0()0 pulc}la~c price: two /5"g5" percent interest in the first year, increas- ing to seven percent after most of the space has been leased. An additional $110,000 for renovation will be sought from founda- tions. Two of the buildings will be sold to provide capital for operating expenses. East New York {BrooklynJ.For over a year, the Local Development Corporation of East New York has been working close- ly with the Public Development Corpora- tion of New York City (PDC} and with In- terface, a nonprofit research and training organization, to convert a four-floor, 20,O00-square-foot industrial building in a badly deteriorated part of Brooklyn into a business incubator. They hope to have the building operating by mid-1985. The building is city-owned and will re- main so under current plans. Specific leas- ing terms have yet to be negotiated be- tween the LDC and the city. Both groups are applying to the city and state and federal sources for nearly $700,000 in renovation funds. Five to seven businesses at a time will be accommodated in the incubator. A three- year rental and occupancy cycle will be followed. In the first year, rents will be set at $1.80 per square foot--about 10 percent below the market rate in the area. In the second and third years, the rents will in- crease 10 percent annually. After the third year, the businesses will be expected to move out, although it is hoped that they will stay in the neighbor- hood. A new set of tenants will move in, and the cycle will continue. Mihailo Ternali Temali is a community development specialist in the Cooperative Community Development Program of the Humphrey Institute. He directed the institute's incubator study. 24 Plannir~g Ma~, 1984 P L A N N I N G P R A C T I C E Another North Bennin~on company manufactures fuel and oil lines for jet airplane engines. .two years, the Barber-Coleman Corporation started the Business Center for New Technology in 1982 in an idle textile machinery plant. The company does not offer any ~mancial assistance itself, but it has donated space in the incubator to the local business development agency. Barber-Colernan's approach may signal a trend if other corpgrations pick up on the idea and offer surplus manufacturing space for use as business incubators. John Dixon, the incubator coordinator, already has met with corporate representatives from two other states considering similar centers. · Advice' While it's Clear that most incubators are still in the fledging stages, their early ex- periences offer some suggestions to potential developers: · Evaluate the potential entrepreneurs. Is there a market for their ideas and products? · Compare the cost of renovating an old structure with the price of building new. · Enlist qualified people with business experience to manage the incubator. · Select a mix of new and established businesses. · Don't waste money on unnecessary services. · Avoid conflicts by developing explicit lease agreements, but be flexible. Candace Campbell, a graduate student at the University of Minnesota's Hubert H. HumPhrey In- stitute of Public Affairs in Minneapolis, is a former plsnner for the Neighborhood Development and Conservation Center in Oklahoma City. She surveyed 50 business incubators as part of a research study for the institute's Cooperative Community Development Program. The study, Business Incubator Profiles, is available from the institute, 267 19th Ave., So., Minneapolis, MN 55455 {S 15; $5 for community groups}. Contacts University Gordon Carlisle, University City Science Cea~er, 3624 Market St., philadelphia, PA 19104; 215-387-2255. John Toon, Advanced Technology Development · Center, Georgia Institute,.-of Technology, O'Keefe Bldl~ Atlanta, GA 30332; . 404-894-3575. Jerry Mahone, Incubator Program, Rensselaer PubUc Greg Balbierz, Office of Economic Development, Municipal Bldg., Akron, OH 44308; 316-375-2133. John H. Kuhlmsnn0 Buffalo Urban Renewal. Agency, 920 City Hall, Buffalo, l%"Y 14202; 716-855-5022. John Fitzlerald, (~ester Development ~'ice, 513 Welsh St.,Chester, PA 19013; 215-447-7853. David Gontarek, Div. of Business Revitalization, Dept. of planning and Economic Development, 25 W. Fourth Nonprofit Rick Recny, Local Development Corp. of East New York, 161 Williams St., Brooklyn, NY 11207; 212-674-2121. June Lavelle, Fulton-Carroll Center for Industry, 325 N. Hoyne~Ave., Chicago, IL 60612; 312-421-3941. l~y~lwynenbur Coun~ Industrial Corp., P.O. Box .~,ST, North Be~.inston, VTy2, 57; 802-422-8975. K~uneth Sauder, Southwest Germantown Community Development Cqrp., 5002 CorporatioTM Sharon O~Flsnnlgan, Control Data Corp. P.O..~Box O,. Minneapolis, MN 55440i ¥2-852-3480. ) L~en Schultz, Technology Cca~rs International, Inc., Route 309, Montgomeryville, PA 18936; 215-646-7800. John Dixon, Business Center for New Technology, Barber-Coleman Co., 1220 Polytechnic Institute, Troy, St., St. Paul, MN 55102; NY 12181;518-Z,§6-6658. 612-292-1577. 19144; 215-84~i~00. 815-968-6833. · ... ,, ...-:-,~,'.: , ' ITIETROPOLIT,qn LU /TE (OnTROL (omml//iorl May 29, 1984 Mayor Robert Polston City of Mound 35780 Lynwood Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Polston: On December 29, 1983 the Governor's Commission to Review the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, chaired by John Boland, issued its Report. One recommendation made by that Commission was that an Independent Management Study of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission be conducted. The MWCC, during January, February and March, 1984, closely reviewed this Report and acted on its many recommendations. Attached for your information is a copy of Commission Resolution No. 84-108, dated March 20, 1984, which states the position of the Commission on the recommendations that were made. As you can see, the Commission has endorsed the conduct of an Independent Management Study. The Commission fUrther acted on May 15, 1984 directing that the Budget and Administration Committee of the Commission prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the conduct of such a Study. At a special meeting on May 24, that Committee passed a resolution calling for the establishment of a task force to develop a Request for P~oposal for the management study. The task force will consist of representatives of the State Departments of Administration and Finance, the Metropolitan Council, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. It is the goal of the Committee to develop an RFP for consideration at the Commission's June meeting. Please be assured that the Commission is moving forward to conduct an Independent Management Study in an expeditious manner. We will keep you apprised of the Commission activities in this regard and look forward to working with you or a representative of the munic- ipalities served by the'Commission toward this effort. If you have any questions, you can reach me at 222-8423. Sincerely yours,~ Louis J. Breimhurst Deputy Chief Administrator LJB/ls cc: The Honorable Rudy Perpich, Governor George H. Frisch, Chairman, MI~CC ~7CC Commissioners Sandra Gardebring, Chairperson, Metropolitan Council Budget and Administration "DD" ~_ E T R O P 0 L I T A N W A S T E C O N T R O L C O M M I S S I O N 350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, _~_innesota 55101 222-8423 _RESOLUTION NO. 84-108 P~ESOLUTION REC~ARDIN~ ..RFCO.~..~NDATIOMS OF GOVERNOR"S BLUE RIBBON CO.~34ISSION WHEREAS, The Governor's Commission to review the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has issued its report; and WHEREAS, That report contains a number of recommendations; and WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, having'revi~wed and discussed the report at two Special and one Regular Meeting of the Commission, has received testimony and comment from thepublic and from interested parties, thereafter adopted certain positions with regard to the recommendations contained in the renort of the Governor's Blue Ribbon Commission; NOW, TheREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED That the ~etroDolitan Waste Control Commission takes the following positions with regard to the recommendations of the Governor's Commission: 1) Recommendation: The position of Chair could be full-time. The Commission takes no ~osition with regard to this recommendation. 2) Sixteen Commissioners should be selected by the Metropolitan Council. The Commission takes no position with regard to this recommendation. 3) Recommendation: An Ombudsman function should be established by the Legislature. The nerson or persons hired should report to the Governor. A motion to suDport this recommendation failed to pass the Commission. 4) Recommendation: Public rate hearings should be held yearly by the ..~WCC to determine the rates to support the proposed budget. The Commission supports a technique whereby rate hearings would be held in the metronolitan area so that rates are set by August 31 of each year-for the following vear. Budget and Administration "DD" 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) A~.~D Recommendation: An appeals process for rates and other measurement method~ decisions impacting communities must be put in place. The Commission supports the recommendation, will undertake to implement it, and has directed its Operations Committee to consider the matter and present recommendations to the full Commission. Recon~endation: An independent management study should be performed to develop a streamlined model for management to be used by the ~54CC. The Commission agrees with the recommendation and has referred the matter to its Budget and Administration Committee for a definition of the proper scope for such a study to be recommended to the full Commission. Recommendation: A Code of Ethics should be adopted immediately. The Commission agrees with the recommendation. A select committee to develop and recommend a Code of Ethics has no~ been a~nointed and will undertake its business in due course. Recommendation: Hiring policies should be revised to ban nepotism, preclude hiring persons with conflicts of interest, and verify education/emplo..vment experience prior to hiring. The Co~mis$ion agrees with the recommendation. Prohibition of nepotism in temporary sun~er emplo.¥ment has already been effected. Extensive hearings-were held by a Committee of the Commission to develoo a personnel hiring plan for entry level Operating Attendant and that olan is now in place. The Commission is continuing to imolement the recommendations on individual matters as we address them. The attached resolutions reflect the steps the Commission has taken. Recommendation: An internal auditor position should be created and must be accountable to the Governor. The Commission supoorts the creation of an internal auditor position. Recommendation: Parts of operations, such as electrical maintenance, research, samoling and measurement of functions should be contracted out, after the labor agreements have been changed to remove the subcontractin~ clause. - 2 - Budget and Administration 11) Recommendation: ~CC labor agreements must be brought into conformance with state agreements. These recommendations are the subject of collective bargaining agreement in place at the oresent time and which the Commission intends to honor. Changes in any of the terms and conditions of the employment will be addressed in the collective bargaining setting. 12) Recommendation: Procedures for awarding and amending contracts must be conformed with orocedures used by state agencies. This issue has been referred to the Commission's Operations Committee for the purpose of recommenda- tions but not necessarily to conform with the state procedures. 13) Recommendation: An actuarial review should be done to determine present and future unfunded liability for retirement benefits and other fringe benefits and should estimate the yearly amount to be added to operating costs for funding these benefits. The Commission has reviewed the suggestion and finds that'it does not fit the needs of the Commission. (See attached addendum showing unfunded liability for retirement benefits and other fringe benefits.) 14) Recommendation: A waste resource task force should be formed to study alternatives and propose long-range plans for dealing with all the state's wastes. Upon reviewing this recommendation the Commission finds that it is in no position to review the waste management resources for the entire state. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That this Resolution be transmitted to the Governor, President of the Senate, and Speaker of the House. Adopted this 20th day of March, 1984 ~'LETROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL CO~ISSION '"~ H ' -Louis ~ B~eimhurst Chairman Deputy Chief Administrator MDT:sl - 3 - Volume XV, Number 3, April 1984 A NEWSLETTER OF THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION · TWIN CITIES AREA Er WCC 1983 Budget Underspent by $5.4 [ qiili°n The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) cut $5.4 million out of the 1983 operating budget. This is approximately 7% of the total budget and also the largest underrun in the Commission's history. The underspending of the budget was due to the fol- lowing: · New rigid controls on expenditures by Commissioners. · A new computerized inventory control system. · Recommendations by a committee of the St. Paul Chamber of Commerce on motor vehicle expenditures. · More efficient operations due to the new sludge pro- cessing facilities. · Staff recommendations that have resulted in substantial savings, especially on electrical costs and an in-house waste recovery system. · In some areas, lower prices than anticipated. There were eight principal areas in.which the 1983 Budget was underspent. AMOUNT CATEGORY UNDERSPENT Wages and Benefits $ 385,000 Contracted Services--Legal 140,000 Contracted Services--Maintenance and Operations 525,000 Materials & Supplies 1,150,000 Motor Vehicle Expense 150,000 Utilities 1,375,000 Chemicals 1,550,000 Capital Outlay 125,000 TOTAL $5,400,000 The $385,000 saved in wages and benefits was accomp- lished by reshuffling some positions, not filling others, and cooperation between our employees and their union rep- resentatives. Contracted legal services were reduced by $140,000 through close evaluation of legal expenditures. The hiring of an in-house staff attorney, who manages the provision of legal services from contract vendors, also contributed to the underrun. Heat from the new sludge incinerators is used in the treatment process in lieu of oil or natural gas. This has resulted in savings in excess of $1 million. The St. Paul Chamber of Commerce provided loaned executives to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commis- sion to study and recommend ways to curb motor vehicle expenditures. These recommendations were instituted by the Commission resulting in savings of $150,000. A computerized inventory control system was installed and a central warehouse established. Existing stocks were drawn down and new purchases limited. A savings of $1,050,000 resulted. The cost underruns will result in credits to most user communities amounting to a total of $4.7 million. The credit will be applied toward their 1985 cost allocation billings. 100% Compliance Achieved in 1953 A record annual volume of 100 billion gallons of waste- water was conveyed and treated in 1983 by the Metro- politan Waste Control Commission. The fourteen waste- water treatment plants achieved a 99 percent compliance in meeting the treated wastewater discharge standards in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. Major pollutants were reduced 65 percent (continued on page 2) Our web-fooled friends are enjoying springtime scenery at the ~4etro Plant. 100% Conformance (continued) beyond requirements in NPDES permits. A record level of )roved air pollution control was attained for sludge neration facilities. Metro Plant met all of the effluent limitations in its NPDES permit in 1983, receiving a performance award from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Effluent quality improved to 10 mg/1 BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) and 9 mg/1 TSS (Total Suspended Solids) for a flow of 224 mgd. Applicable monthly effluent standards were 24 mg/1 BOD and 30 mg/1 TSS. The last major phase of the $300 million expansion pro- gram at the Metro Plant was completed in 1983. New facil- ities for the incineration of sludge, recovery of heat from incinerators in the form of steam for reuse, auxiliary steam production, air pollution control of flue gases, heat drying of sludge for recycle, dry incinerator ash handling by con- veyance, storage and removal, and computerized mater- ials inventory and maintenance management were put into operation. The new facilities moved the plant to become a modern, efficient, flood-protected, energy conserving operation, projected to meet the minimum treatment standards necessary for the metropolitan area through the year 2000. There are thirteen treatment plants other than the Metro Plant that treat about 18 percent of the wastewater volume processed in the metropolitan system each year. In 1983 five of these plants had no violations of limitations in NPDES permits (Bayport, Stillwater, Empire and Savage :eiving performance awards), and only four had more in one violation. The Hastings Plant is undergoing an expansion program and was the only plant with any signif- icant compliance problems during 1983. These plants had excellent performance, as demon- strated by the average effluent quality achieved: 9 mg/,1 BOD and 10 mg/1 TSS in 1983. These figures compare with average effluent quality standards of 24 mg/1 BOD and 28 m§/1 TSS. New sludge dewatering facilities were installed and pJaced into operation at the Seneca Plant (the second largest treatment plant in the system). Projections indicate more than a two-thirds reduction in fuel use for sludge incineration and more than a 50 percent reduction in chemical costs for removing water from sludge. The in- creased sludge processing capacity will enable sludge from the Blue Lake Plant to be mainly processed at the Seneca Plant rather than at the Metro Plant. Below are two charts showing a summary of the 1983 treatment plant effluent quality and NPDES permit com- pliance for the past .5 years. The Commission has a record it can' be proud of in these two areas. NPDES PERMIT COMPLIANCE AT EXISTING PLANTS TREATffi[NT PLAflT BRVPORT gLUE LAKE CMAS;<A COTTAGE GaOV[ SENECa 2 98 2 gg 5 97 8 94 19 67 2 97 -- 95 3 95 1 99 2 !6 0 10O 1 92 0 lO0 2 63 0 )30 8 57 15 69 2 96 8 89 0 !o0 95 92 !00 10C 1983 ANNUAL SUMMARY OF TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT QUALITY Westeweter lgB) Flow Percent mqd Re'nova! Treatment 1983 NPCES Plant Oe a iqn* Avq~. E~SD TSS Limit Ano~e 2,4G 2 .)3 94 94 Beyport 0.65 0.54 gG 9G Blue Le~e 20.00 lB.1 gG 97 Choke 1o40 1.02 92 91 Cottage Grove 1.BO 1.30 95 93 Empire 6.00 4.81 99 99 Heatings 1.B) 1.65 9) 87 Maple Plain 0.22 0.)~ 92 9) Nedina 0.10 0.18 91 89 etropoliten 250 220 94 95 i~'nOJnt 0.60 0.~4 90 99 S ev~e 0.86 0.59 9) 98 Seneca 24.09 15.8 94 91 Still.~t~r ].02 2.84 92 9] Fecal Coll. Geometric B~D ~S Mean Nutrients, m~/1 mq/1 mq/l MPN/IO0 ml Phosphorus Ammonia 1983 1983' C~OD TBOD NPBES 1983 NPC~S 1983 NP[~S 1983 NPCES 1985 Avq. Arq. Limit Arq. Limlt Avq. Limi[ AYq. Limit Arq. 25 11 lS 34) 10 200 67 --- 4.2 --- 15.6 25 6 9 )0 6 200 10 1.0 0.4 --- ).0 25 9 25 )0 7 200 8 --- ).1 --- 9.2 25 11 17 )0 11 200 8 --- 1.B --- 7.) 25 9 19 )0 11 200 53 --- 5.0 --- 13.5 10 3 ) 10 1 200 ~ --, 4.6 1.0 0.4 25 16 27 ~0 23 200 44 --- 6.9 --- 16.0 25 9 12 30 9 200 lO --- 2.5 --- 9.1 -- 10 14 -- 14 ........ 2.7 --- 9.6 24 i0 19 30 9 200 25 --- 2.2 --- 11.7 25 16 17 30 2 200 4 1.0 0.2 --- 28.0 25 8 8 ~0 ) 200 22 --- ~.6 --- !.4 25 14 22 50 18 200 26 --- ~.7 --- !5.q 25 lO ' 16 ]O 12 200 25 1.0 0.6 --- lO.~ Dissolved Turbidity Ox ¥gen NFU mq/1 NP CI[S 19B) NPCES IgB) Limit ArR. Limit ~¥q. 25 6 .... 1.8 25 2 .... 3.8 2~ 8 ---- 10.2 25 ) .... 9.2 25 5 .... 5.1 25 i >~ .0 10.0 25 lO .... 6.0 -- 6 .... 6.4 -- 7 ---- ).0 -- 5 .... 3.4 25 3 .... 7.2 25 3 .... 63.9 25 7 .... 9.1 2s 5 .... 4.8 Sewer installed Have you passed by Lake Calhoun the last few months and wondered what the construction work going on was all about? The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission was installing a new steel siphon sani[ary sewer to replace the original one which was installed in 1900 and occasion- ally overflowed into Lake Calhoun. "This is an in-house project, done entirely by MWCC staff. It consists of a new twin 18-inch diameter siphon barrel, 150 feet long, under the channel connectin8 Lake Calhoun and Lake of the Isles; two hundred sixty-one feet of 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe, and five new man- holes, most of which were installed on Minneapolis Park Board property," Ken Foster, Design and Construction Resident Engineer, stated. The need for the project became apparent after it was learned than an existin8 twin 12-inch diameter siphon would plug up with debris and cause blockage of sewage flow upstream. The reason for the blockage in the existing line was twofold. First, tke old 24-inch tine is a "combina- tion'' sewer which handles storm runoff as well as sewage. This allows debris to eh[er the line durin8 rainy periods. Second, ~he old 12-inch siphon was constructed with 90 degree bends which would all6w the plugging to occur in the upstream bends and force raw sewage to drain out by a bypass pipe into the lake. With the larger diameter siphon (18-inch) and smooth radius bends of only 35 degrees, the new siphon should not have sewage backup prQblems. "To comply with Minneapolis Park Board requirements, the project had to be constructed during the months of November, December and January to minimize inter- ference with the park users," said Lanny Bakalyar, Con- struction Inspector. However, severe weather and unforeseen problems caused the delay of operation completion near]y a month. Final cleanup and restoration is scheduled to be complete by mid-May of 1984. Construction cost is $156,662. Skidding siphon toward '- ~&: ..~,;, ~ ..... ~;- channel. Left to right: ~"~, ' ~k~)~k"'¢ .:" ' . B I Harvey and Ken Fosler Siphon in place and read~ to sink. ,.'~,--~.- Er WCC Wins Annu [ Finsncisl Report Awsrd The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has been awarded the Certificate of Conformance in Financi, Reporting by the Municipal Finance Officers Association (MFOA) of the United States and Canada for its compre- hensive annual financial report (CAFR) for the fiscal year Richard Berg with award, iai concerning government reporting techniques. ending December 31, 1982. The Certificate of Confor- mance is the highest form of recognition in the area of government accounting and financial reporting. This award is presented to only 5% of the eligible government entities. The Certificate of Con- formance Program pro- vides government with easy and economical access to an extensive amount of technical reference mater- accounting and financial Certificate of Conformance reports must be well organ- ized and written in a clear and precise style. Richard L. Berg, MWCC Comptroller, has been pre- sented with an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement by MFOA. This award and the Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting both represent a significant accomplishment by the Commission and by Mr. Berg Chief Administrator George Lusher Resigns George W. Lusher, Chief Administrator of the Metro- politan Waste Control Commission, retired January 6, 1984 after a twenty year career with the Commission. He entered private practice as a consulting engineer. Lusher, a registered professional engineer, was ap- pointed Chief Administrator November 1, 1980 after former Chief Administrator Richard Dougherty resigned. Lusher was the Commission's second Chief Administrator. Lusher came to the Commission in 1964 when it was known as the Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District and served as maintenance engineer at the Metro Plant. He was the Commission's (formerly Metropolitan Sewer Board) Director of Operations for ten years. Through his leadership George Lusher brought the Commission to an unsurpassed record of compliance with stringent water quality standards which ranks among the nation's best. The Board of Commissioners passed a resolution at their January 17, 1984 meeting acknowledging his "outstand[ public service and personal dedication to th~ environment throughout his twenty .~ears of service with the Metropolitan \~,aste Control Commission." We wish George the best in this new phase of his career. Central States To tY, eet The Central States Water Pollution Control Association's ~nual Meeting will be held May 15-18, 1984, at the polls Plaza Hotel (formerly the Sheraton-Ritz). MWCC staff presenting papers at the meeting include John Almo, Ray Eyler, Claude Anderson, Hugh McConnell and Tom Ramlet. Dr. Abel Wolman, one of America's foremost sanitary engineers, will be the keynote speaker at the meeting. He For further information contact Robert Ca]lery, Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Inc., at 292-4400. in [t ernory The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission suffered a great loss with the untimely deaths of three employees within a three month period. Fouad M. Helou, Manager of Plant Technology, passed away January 5, 1984. Fred came to the Commission January 16, 1980 as Process Manager and was promoted to Manager of Plant Technology October, 1980. Bernard J. Harrington, Director of Engineering, passed away February 9, 1984. Bernie came to the Commission in 1975 as Deputy Director of Construction and was shortly promoted to Director of Engineering. Louis Testa, Operating Attendant at the Metro Plant, passed away March 1, 1984. Lou came to the Commission August 5, 1983 and worked at the Metro Plant throughout his career with the Commission. at the Commission miss their friendship and ac- ledge the service and skill they gave-to the people of ~etropolitan area. Envirc. nmentsi Expo The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission partici- pated in the 1ST ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXPO, March 24 and 25 at Brookdale Mall in Brooklyn Center. Sponsored by the Metro Regional Environmental Edu- cation Council (a division of the Department of Natural Resources), the Expo featured exhibits from nearly 35 agencies, organizations, and businesses involved with resource use, resource management, or environmental issues. Jean Bergal explains what a treatment plant is to two young visitors. Meeting Schedule FULL COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, May 15, 1984--2:00 p.m. Metropolitan Council Chambers, 300 Metro Square Building, 7th & Robert Street, Saint Paul, MN 55101. George H. Frisch, Chairman E, Bergal. Public Information Officer April, 1984 Bulk Rate U.S. Postage PAID Mpls., Minn. Permit No. 10 /:?7 "~HAMBER WAVES" -., ,--wesi on a area chamber GF:NERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING - .THURSDA~Y, JUNE 21, Lafayette Club JOINT MEETING - MOUND ROTARY GUEST SPEAKER - SANDRA S. GARDEBRING Chair Me'tropolitan Council SOCIAL: 12 :O. 0, LUNCH:'- 12: 20, 'PROGRAM:: 12: 45 - Please note date and time changes. All Chamber members who are not Rotarians '~are requested to make their reservations to the Chamber office by 12:OO Wednesday the 2'Oth. 472-6780 - ThanK-you. ... . ~Pd~SIDENT ' S LETTER: i",, ",: ..... . ...... . ... '".'_' '.,,.'",~ .' " ~4 ~'~ .,,. Last month, the-Board of Directors heid a.special"mid-year mini-retrea~ ~o reassess this year's goals. The D~ec~ors felt that since our WestonKa area is definitely in'a: period of change dna growth ~hat it behooves the Chamber ~o frequently review its services and goals"so that we are best meeting our members changing needs..Three prominent, areas of concern were iaenti/'ied: . .. '~" l.) Concern: The proposed re-~eveiopment'of Cty. Rd. ~/ i5. Resoultion: 'Steve Wood will ac~ as the Chamber's liason person on this prooect. He will .Keep in touch with all government Oodles involved and Keep us informed on the project's progress.through the "Chamber Waves" and meetings. At this t~me the Chamber's goals regarding the re-aeve±opmen~ of 15 are ~o Keep the prooec~ moving forward, to make sure that our member- ship is well informed so that they can voice concerns intelligently and plan their business'strategies acco. rdingly, and ~o have an end result that is esthetically pleasing and as practical as possible. 2.) Concern: The need to continue expanding customer awareness of the quality of Goods and Services available in the Westonka marketplace. Resolution: Continue to strengthen and develop the re~ai! councils, 'create more marketing tools such as the Westonka Business Directory, Chic is currently working on a new idea for distribution to new ares resi- dents, Remember, we have over ~00 new residential units currently being readied for occupancy! Hopefully, this p~ogram will be ready for participation by early July. Watch your mail for more details! - 3.) Concern:' Long term business develpomen~. Resolution: Of course this Chamber s~,~]ongly supports the need n healthy business climate within our ¢~6~munity. I'n-'this perioo of wnaz .seem-~ like a constant stream of remodelinfjs, final.closings, new projects, and grand-re-openinings and openings, it is ~ome~imes hard to get one's bearings. The Board feels that this Chamber ~ust establish a ~.~ell-define~, ,yet flexible program for encouraging ano welcoming, new businesses to the area, The Board hopes that the member~llip will convey, their thoughts anO concerns on how this sub0ect should b~st be approached ~ither to them per- sonally or to the Chamber office. We are looming at the possibility of establishing a standing Business Development Council which after a few organizational meetings would act at the Board's request~on specifid issues in this potentially far-reaching.and sometimes tec~ical area. The general concensus og the Directors present at 'the meeting was that over the last few years, the WestonkaLChamber has achieved its first set of goals which were to create a consistant, effectig~ organization dedicated to the betterment'of Westonka businesses and' the.community~ If we are to progress, from this level'of accomplishm~{, %hen we must work hard ~t ex- panding Our lines of communication and awareness~ To that' end, please ta~e note of the following 198& Directors and OffiCers JiiS%, These inOlviouals ~;ill welcome your questions,~ concerns ~d 6omments./"Ple%se be sure to Keep them informed of your thoughts. : ': . Ted 'Koenecke, President IWSd Directors: President Ted Koene~Ke'".d72-2~18,'F~sident Elect Steve Wooc ~71-8q~3, Treasurer Donna Ouigley 472-2121, Secretary Dan Regah h71-9318, Past Fresident'Paul Pond 472-2222;' Jo~ Burger &73-3D5W, Helen Daum .471-7705, Jim Dic~ins0n:..471~OITl, Roger. Fi~es;-472-5968,Audr'ey ' ' ' . ~-' CALENDAR ~ - · ~ ' Mound Retail Council, AI&A]~s,-6~OO Dinnen (Oot.). ~:00 Meeting - Governmental Affairs Councii,~''Lmfaye%te Club,~ 7:3OA.M. 12 - Board of Directors, Twin Birch, 7:(30 ~.H... 12 - Navarre Retail Council~' Pzza On The ~ke, 6~30 Dinner (Opt. , 7:30 Meeting ' · *** 21 - T~RSDAY - Ceneral Membership Meeting, ~fayette Club Don't forget the BLUE WATER-DAZE FESTIVAL on the ~th and l()thl See you at the FARADE-~NE ~-2:O0 P.M. and at the CELEBRITY BRUNCH AT AL &".A~AS -. PRECEDING THE ~A~DE (,This event is open to the.public - .[1:30 to i:30. CItlCKEN SCIb',TC~S: · *A special Thank-you to everyone 2~volved in last mo~th's ~Deneral' mee~ing~ Lets Reep the lines of communication open. I h~,ve heard lots of encour- aging comments. · *All three of our Councils are currently see~ing new members. Here ls your chance to contribute. You'are--weloome to attend any of the above meetings. · *ThanKs again to Audrey Schultz - The ~amber Pots look great~ · *Don't miss seeing Ba~lew and ~Kewinds - they' are gorgeous. · *Spe~Eing of gorgeous the Greenhouse area is looking great~ Dave Orn is the manager of the new Greenhouse 'Bottle ~Hop. ' e~ C '~"~"" 'Bulk Rate '.'.L~'~, ,~, . ' -.4~.,~ ~ U.S. Postage ~'~..','~.,:.,.t~.,~:~.~.~,:~ :t:~'~ City of Moun~ . ~ ", ,..",, ~ .".']~.'~:~&~,;~ 5~:,~, ~ ' 'Mound; MN 55364 _ ~~,. ~ :~~J Attn: Jon Elam ',' ';'"" league of minnesota cities May 17, 1984 TO: FROM: RE: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks Peter Tritz and Don Slater Report of the LMC Local Government Aid Policy Task Force The Procedure Enclosed is a copy of the proposed policy statement on local government aid which has been approved by the League's local government aid policy task force. The LMC Board of Directors invites all city officials to submit written comments on this proposed statement. The Board will also conduct a hearing on this policy statement at the League's annual conference in Duluth. The Board will then take action to approve, amend, or disapprove the statement following that hearing. If it is approved, the League's Revenue Sources legislative committee will then begin work to develop a formula embodying the policy. Both the policy and the formula would then be presented for adoption as formal League policy at the LMC Legislative Conference next January. The Policy The type of formula contemplated by this policy would differ from the current formula in several ways: First, the policy proposes that population and/or households should be a significant formula element. Second, the policy proposes a floor or minimum distribution which all cities would receive, unlike the current formula under which some cities would eventually receive no aid. And third, the policy proposes to measure "need" by the city's expenditures for a specified list of basic municipal services. By contrast, the current formula's "need" measure is the sum of the city's current LGA plus its levy limit. There was considerable controversy within the task force on the issue of "need," and how'any measure of expenditures or revenues should fit into the formula if at all. The task force ultimately concluded that the formula should reflect a city's expenditures for "basic municipal services." Defining which expenditures would count as a "basic municiPal service" proved to be very difficult, and involved extensive discussion. The list included in the policy is a compromise between members who preferred a very narrow definition of "basic municipal services, and those who argued for a more inclusive list. -over- avenue easts, sts. paul,r-n~nn_._,osa' ~ 55 ~, ©q -2- The Task Force The LGA policy task force consisted of the following elected officials: Sig Stene, Lindstrom, Chairman; Meg Bye, Duluth; Steve Cramer, Minneapolis; June Demos, Roseville; Kelly Ferber, Fergus Falls; Doc Hall, Waseca; Duane Knutsom, Fertile; Connie Morrison, Burnsville; Bruce Nawrocki, Columbia Heights; Dean Nyquist, Brooklyn Center; and A1 Ringsmuth, Waite Park. Of the task force members, June Demos has declined to support this statement, because it does not include a per capita cap on the amount of expenditures which would be permitted to affect the formula. PT:DS:rmm league of minnesota oities LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID POLICY (Proposed) SYNOPSIS A Local Government Aid formula should be a simple expression of the Legislature's intent. Local government aid (LGA) should be distributed according to 1) the city's revenue raising capacity, as measured by its taxable assessed value; and 2) the city's need, as measured by its population and/or households and its expenditures for basic municipal services. STATEMENT AND RATIONALE Local Government Aid is a major municipal revenue source which complements cities' other major revenue source, the property tax. As such, LGA must be distributed among cities in a way which alleviates the problems inherent in reliance on the property tax as the major revenue source cities control. Cities vary markedly in their ability to raise money from property taxes. There are also wide variations among cities in their citizens' need for services and the costs of providing those services. A complementary revenue source for cities is necessary precisely because a city's ability to raise revenue from the property tax does not necessarily coincide with the cost of the services which that city must provide to its citizens. An LGA formula must reflect both the individual city's need and its local revenue raising capacity. A city's capacity to raise revenues from the property tax is easily measured by the city's equalized assessed value. (For metro-area cities, the assessed value after fiscal disparities distributions is the appropriate figure.) An acceptable aid formula should provide proportionally more aid to cities with less taxable assessed value, other things being equal. Need is more difficult to define and to measure. There is no single data item which measures need equitably; rather, we must rely on a combination of factors to approximate need. Need is clearly related to some extent to the city's number of inhabitants. Cities provide services to people. Because some services relate more closely to households than to individuals, the formula should reflect both the population and the number of households. Every city should receive a basic LGA distribution based on its population and/or number of households. However, neither population nor the number of households completely reflects need. Cities with similar populations and numbers of households may be faced with quite different service needs. (Factors such as age, .. - OVER- ! ~3 L,';n:vensit¥ avenue eae~, st. paul, minnesota 551 Off £61 2) 227-5600 Local Government Aid Policy (Proposed) Page 2 construction and density of buildings, crime rates, elderly population, school age population, climate, geographic size, population density, poverty levels, crime rates, seasonal or daily influx of people, need to construct or replace capital facilities, and a myriad of other factors may cause similar sized cities' needs to differ.) Clearly, a formula cannot attempt to incorporate measures of all of these factors; the result would necessarily be complicated and to some extent arbitrary. Rather, the formula should rely on the judgment made by the persons in the best position to evaluate a city's need: that city's council. The local city council's judgment as to the expenditures required in order to provide the type and level of service needed by its citizens should be reflected in the formula. The formula should reflect all expenditures for basic municipal services. "Basic municipal services" include public safety, streets, sanitation, libraries, redevelopment, and general government and related purposes. This definition is intended as a limit, to assure that a city will not receive additional local government aid as a result of its discretionary spending on non-essential services.~ So far as possible, the formula should not be affected by the city's choice among tax levies, special assessments, or user fees to finance basic municipal services. To the attempt to measure need by the tax levy, or by past LGA, or by a combination of those factors is not acceptable. The past LGA distribution is the result of several formula changes accompanied by grandfather provisions, minimum increase guarantees, etc. Thg resulting distribution pattern is at least somewhat arbitrary. And to focus on past aids and levies or levy limits ignores the other revenues which cities' citizens contribute so that the city can meat their service needs. A formula develdpad in accordance with this policy would likely result in a substantially different distribution of funds. The transition must be handled in an orderly fashion, avoiding drastic year-to-year increases or decreases in aid. Increases and decreases should be phased in, to avoid the need for sudden "shock" property tax increases on one hand, and the temptation to view increased aid as a windfall on the other. 1This explanatory sentence was added after the task force's last meeting, at ~ ~ ~ ~ who was the sugge~io,~ of a ~em,~_r unable to attend that meeting because of illness; the addition cf this sentence was approved by an over~,helming majority of the task force and by the LMC Board. Our 2nd Annual Salad Luncheon will have two seatings - 11:30 and 1:00. Tickets are $2.50 and are Our exercise program "Keeping Fit" available at the Senior Center. Any-will begin today. Sign up at the Cen- ter. It will continue on Monday and one who wishes to donate a salad or $2.50 for miscellaneous supplies may do so by signing on the list at the Center. Come one and all for' this delicious treat. Weston~a Seniors, I.nc. Club meet- ing. This meeting will feature our new "Keeping Fit" exercise program - a gift from the Mound Medical Clinic, You'll even get a chance to bec'~me a little more fit! The long-awaited trip to College- ville, Sauk Center, and Little Falls will begin at 8:00 from the arena parking lot. Cost is $25 and will cover motorcoach, transportation,din- ner, and entrance fees at Lindberg Family Home and Sinclair Lewis Inter- pretive Center. Sign up early' and join the crowd for this trek in the beautiful countryside. We will be celebrating Flag Day with a special dinner and ceremony on this day. Wednesday throughout the summer. Hope- fully by fall we will have a daily class and you can come any day you wish The ever-popular trip to the Show- boat on the Mississippi is here again. This..year's production by the delight- ,,, _ Recently the Suburban Communit3 Services, R.S.V.P., and the Volunteers of America honored the Westonka Seniors Volunteers with a breakfast and dinner. The Executive Board of the Westonka Seniors Inc. would like to add their name to the lis.t honor- ing the volunteers. We realize that our success de- pends totally upon the gratious giving of time and effort by our volunteers. So here's to you. Thanks for Plan to ~ring your friends and try everything and keep up the good ck at our monthly B---O Party. work~ your lUfearznholy. " Dou hnuts" will ' Snacks ~tUFungbe~ins at g:~ o .... · be serv 7o 0e04P: ; Doc Mezer Please call the C~nter bef r 0 if ou need transportation. The ~houMhts of the month slipped ~¥; before i~ was un~tured on paper. ,the'meantime, while rum~.g]ng ~hrou,~h Les of what-nots, these :;ines were ~nd. Notes had been ,~ottSd dowry, irt a ~ss about improving the self image.. ter~ re-reading the 8 steDs toward self provemerrt, a thought passed that per-- ps otb'ers might wish to review them, "HOW TO INFLUENCE THE SELF IMAGE" beginning the day, in, a new and better wayl 1. to be'as cheerful as possible 2. to feel and act more friendly towards others 3. be'~less c~itical and"more tolerant of others, their faults, failings and mistakes. Placing the %he best interpretatioH, upo~ their acts 4. as far as possible, act as if success ~s inevitable-feel a sort of- ~ebrity. "Acting and f~eling" this celebrity 5.. pessimism and negativism will not color facts 6. practice smiling at least three tim~s a day 7. ALWAYS ac~ calmlyand intelligently 8. IgHore and close the mind to all pessimistic and Negative "facts" over-w~ic~ I have no Control! Work on the one most needed to be improved until mastered.. TaEe the next,, until you, feel the eight have been~ mastered. Feel better?. Thought so! -NLD OI~I~I~'IDI~IDI~I~I~I~I~I~iOIBI~I8I~I~ WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER HOME OF'THE WESTONKA SENIORS, INC. IDENT - "Doc" Meier ETTER EDITOR - Lucile Duffy NEWSLETTER STAFF - Theresa Gauvin. Evelyn Haarstick, Emma Kloss, Dottle Meier' Leona Peterson.and Dorothy Rauschendorfer. CENTER COORDINATOR - Cathy Bailey STRAWBERRY MERINGUE TORTE ! pkg. yellow cake mix~ 4 eggs, separated Make cake mix according to direc- tions on box except use four egg yolks instead of two whole eggs. Put batter into two-nine inch layer tins or a 9 x 13" cake pan. MERINGUE: ~ cup sugar ~ tsp. cream of 4 egg whites tartar % tsp. vanilla Beat egg whites and cream of tartar until foamy. Gradually add sugar and beat until egg whites form stiff peaks. Fold in vanilla. Care- fully spoon the meringue over cake batter. Sprinkle meringue with: 2 Tbsp. sugar 1 tsp. cinnamon- mixed together~ Then sprinkle with ~ cup slivered almonds. Bake 30 minutes n 375~ oven . Serve with whipped cream and frozen strawberries. Raspberries, sliced peaches or any fruit of your choice may be used in place of the strawberries. THANK YOU A big "Thanks" to all of you who , brought plants for our exchange. Your response with 65 plants was greatly appreciated. It has been suggested we have an- other Plant Exchange this fall. Should we? Let me know. I'm sure all ef us will have lots of nice plants by then to share with one another. Again, thank you.,~/~,,· ~ 'Tis a quiet, diminutive lady that one very often notices, until her funny bone is tickled - then the face crinkles into laughter lines; the bright glistening blue eyes partially close, as her mellow voice breaks forth, revealing her amusement. Mary Ellen (Shaughnessy) Church is an individual who has worn many hats in her lifetime. The first hat was worn shortly after May 31, 1895. This baby bonnet was displayed in the city of .Minneapolis, her birth place. Mary Ellen's father worked for the Federal Government and the family lived in federal quarters; government dams were changed from wooden to cement dams all along the Mississippi River. The nature of her father's employ- ment necessitated a number of moves 'for the family. So it was at Grand Rapids, Minnesota, that Mary Ellen ~-graduated from High School, where she was certified as a teacher. The man in her life loomed above the horizon; it was then that her perspective changed and she decided one term of teaching was enough. James, better known as A1 Church, finished his stint in the army and they were married in Duluth in 1919. Again Mary Ellen resumed her gypsy type of moving. Her husband employed by the Canadian National Railroad as a dispatcher and tele- grapher, brought his bride to Port Arthur, now known as Thunder Bay, Ontario. After spending ten years there, they moved to Williams, Min- nesota. Their only child, Rosemary, was born in Duluth. Busy all of her life, Mary Ellen found time to fill more of the pro- verbial hats. She served well the county in which she lived; the Lake of the Woods for many years. For 14 years she served as a me~ber of ~Board of Welfare, Chairman of tie ~.".Re'd C'~"fbr two ~ars, ~c.l'~we~ · two more years as chef, ir ~an roi ~he Democratic Party. The Food Ration-- lng Board was established during the Depression for which Mary Ellen lent her services. Sandwiched between these activities and the Clerk of Courts, our busy lady served as a member of the Williams, l!innesota, school board as well as manager of the William~ Telephone Company for seven years. A1 retired, and the two moved to Navarre for seven years. The next fourteen years have been spent in the Netka Apartments. The past five years have had their moments of lonliness, since Al's passing, but it does not get to Mary Ellen. She still keeps active. As a member of Our Lady of the Lake Church, she takes an active part in the St. Mary's Guild, has been an officer in the Women's Council and the Auxiliary of the Knights of Columbus. For several years, the Mound Human Rights Commission had Mary Elle~ as one of the Commissioners. Two Senior Housing Projects in the city of Mound has been touched by the ingenuity of this lady. And speaking of Senior Citizens, Mary Ellen is still doing her part in the organization. No wonder she was chosen as a Senior Citizen of the Year for Hennepin County. Hobbies are her cup of tea. "Weekly Bridge " and "500" clubs find Mary Ellen a devotee of both. through them that love Baseball and Of course, [!ary Ellen has enjoyed watching her four grandsons grew from childhood to manhood. It wa she learned to ~ ~9~~e~'. ~~ ~ "Is she ever crazy about base- a a remark was overheard on ors' Activity Bus. When base- ali Js mentiened, her personality banges into an avid, eager fan and s a very intense follower of her avorite team - The TWINS. She eeps up with the best of baseball ans; she knows all the plays, fol- ows the batting and pitching aver- ges of each Twin batter and pitcher. And Bingo! Every Thursday evening ne will find Mary Ellen in her cus- omary place, playing not one, but ix cards at a time. This World that ~'ra a livin' in, is mighty hard to beat. You get a thorn with every rose, but aren't the roses sweet? --author unknown People - people - people - another avorite hobby! While living in innipeg, Mary Ellen loved to spend ours :~s a people watcher in the anadian National Depot. To this ay, when she sees strangers, she cnders about their life style and. ow it has affected them. ainly it is easy to understand o rv Ellen has slio~ed into these any hats during her lifetime. Sure- ~, a Twins cap must look cute on her~ HOUSE CARD RULEM: Playing time - Friday 12:30 to 4:00 P.M. Player must play full period to receive prize - if winner. 3. Every Senior is welcome. The contribution for the prize is voluntary (.50¢). 4. Part time player cannot dis- place anyone who wishes to play full period? - - Bob Murphy " ItOST: HOST: 4 HOST: 5 HOST. 6 HOST: 7 HOST: 8 Flaten Bartos iBurtons Pehles Roufs Fischer ~. ~g~ & Ward HOST: AM Doris LeGau~ HOST: HOST: HOST: HOST: PM Irene B. AM B. Putt AM Leona Miller AM D. Prestige AM Millie P. PM Anne Nagel PM Bunny D. PM M~rv Ellen PM B~ ~,,~ ll HOST: 13 14 15 HOST: 12 HOST: HOST: HOST: ~ & G. Hodge Langners K]oss Anderson Susag Kitcher Kretlow, Lewis Trutnau RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: AM Theresa G. AM Millie K. AM Leona P. AM lucille E. AM Millie P. PM Irene Donner PM Gail D. PM Esther Kelly PM Mary Ellen PM Bess Kust 18 19 20 21 22 HOST: HOST: HOST: HOST: HOST: Sima.rs Bartos Berg / Krysel Kust / Olson Dahl / Belt RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: AM Doris LeGault AM Millie K. AM Dottle O. AM Lucille E. AM Millie P. · M Irene B. PM Evelyn Ebert PM D. Prestidge PM Mary Ellen PM Bessie G. 25 .26 27 28 29 HOST: HOST: HOST: HOST: HOST: Knott / Schuler Rice / Rokutani N ichischs D. & H. Hodges Siefert/ Jennie ~ A. RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: RECEP: AM D~rothy P. AM B. Putt AM Evelyn T. AM Leona M. AM Millie P. PM Irene Donner PM Esther Kelly PM Bunny D. PM Mary Ellen PM Flo Jensen ful, talented University young people will be "The Count of Monte Christo". We will leave the various pickups be~- ginning at 3:30 for dinner at Duff's. There will be a mysterious jaunt for a couple of hours before we travel to the banks of the Mississippi for the melodrama. Cost of $15 covers every- thing. Due by June 5th. Trip to the beautiful Porkupine Mountains and Apostle Islands. Full cost of $199 covers everything in- cluding all the meals (except lunch on-~the way up. $30 due on June 5th. Riverboat cruise through the dalles of the St. Croix with scrumptious chickeu dinner at the Da!,es House. Cost is $12. Co-sponsored by Subur- ban Community ~ervices and Med Center Health Plan affiliated with Park-Nic- ollet Medical Center and Med Center's Medicare Program. Our third fall trip to Cascade Lo~ on the North Shore. $135 covers all the costs for this lovely trip includ- zng family-style dining and loving hosts. $25 downpayment ~s due July 3. 0 0 Z 0 ~1Z I 0 'g 300 Metro Square Bldg., St. Paul, MN 55101 General Office Telephone (612) 291-6359 CL:~ , 5341 A Metropolitan Council Bulletin for Community For more information on items in this publication, May 11, 1984 RECENT COUNCIL ACTIONS (April 30Wlay 11) Transportation-Estimates released last week showed that many more people would use light rail transit (LRT) or a busway along two Twin Cities traffic corridors than the present bus system. However, an LRT system may not attract a lot more riders than a busway, according to the estimates prepared by Council consultants. The corridors run along University Ay. between downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul, and along a southwest corridor connecting downtown Minneapolis with Hopkins and Hwy. 101 in Minnetonka. The Council asked the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development to fund a $1 million expansion of the Minnesota Rideshare Program as the highest priority project of regional transportation. The funds will come from the U $. Department of Energy. Solid Waste-The Council dropped the proposed work- house site from further consideration and said that Ramsey County does not contain any satisfactory sites for the disposal of mixed municipal solid waste. As a result, the Council reduced the county's required site complement from four to zero. - --The Council approved issuanc~ ors permit for the-F.M. Frattalone Excavating and Grading Co. to expand its six- acre demolition waste landfill in Little Canada by seven acres. The Council approved issuance of a permit for the Douglas Disposal Corp. to build and operate a 2,5-acre demolition landfill in Eagan. The Council adopted a report that establishes the scope of an environmental impact statement required for a 31 percent expansion of the Oak Grove Landfill in Oak Grove, proposed by Northwest Disposal, Inc. The report identifies the time- table, issues, alternatives, further studies and necessary permits. Parks-The Council approved a Dakota County master plan for land acquisition and development for Spring Lake Park Reserve. The Council also approved a $125,000 development grant contract wi~ the county. The grant is a local match with federal Great River Road funds to build an entrance road and picnic area to the park reserve. The Council also approved the following development grant amendments: - Long Lake-Rush Lake Regional Park: $1.1 million for a swimming beach, a picnic area, a nature interpretive area and an access road. The amendment raises the grant total to $1 .B million. - Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park Reserve: S400,000 for a variety of improvements, raising the grant total to S829,450. - Battle Creek Regional Park: S250,000 for a pavilicn, an entrance road, parking, hiking and bicycling paths. It raises the grant total to S1 million. Housing-The Council said a request by Lakeville for federal mortgage insurance is consistent with Council 3uide- lines. However, the Council;said that federal approval should be contingent on Lakeville amending its comprehensive plan . to include the development in its 1990 Metropolitan Urban Service Area. · Arm-The Council approved $185,000 in productiOn assistance projects for 37 regional arts organizations for fiscal year 1984. PUBLIC HEARINGS, PUBLIC MEETINGS Solid Waste-The Metropolitan Council will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, May 23, 7-10 p.m., at Prairie View Elementary School, 17225 PeterbOrg Rd,, Eden Prairie, on a proposed expansion of the Flying Cloud solid waste landfill in Eden Prairie. For a copy of the draft environmental impact statement summary, pub. no. 12~34~354 at cost, call the Council at 291-6464. To speak at the meeting, call 291-6447. The Council will hold a public meeting Thursday, May 31, 7-10 p.m., on a proposed 450 acre-foot expansion of the Louisville solid waste landfill in Louisville Twp. at St. Mary's School in Marystown. For a copy of the draft environmental assessment worksheet, pub. no. 12~4~352, call the Council at 291-6464. To speak at the meeting, call 291-6447. The Council has set a public meeting for 7 p.m. Tuesday. June 5, at the Newport City Hall, 596 7th Ay., Newport, hear public comment on an environmental assessment wo~ sheet, pub. no. 12~4-067, and on the need for an environ- mental impact statement on a waste processing facility proposed by Waste-to-Energy, Inc. For a copy of the work- sheet, call 291-6464. If you plan to speak at the meeting, call 291-6447. Life Support-The Metropolitan Health Planning Board will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. Tuesday, May 29, in ;he Council Chambers, Stillwater City Hall, 216 N. 4th St., Stillwater, to obtain public commen~ on a proposal by Lakeview Emergency Medical Services, 919 W. Anderson St., Stillwater, for a license to operate a basic life support trans- portation service in portions of Washington County. For more information, cail 291-6352. The Health Planning Board will hold a public hearing at 4 p.m. Wednesday, May 30, in the City Council Chambers, Burnsville City Hall, 1313 Hwy. 13, Burnsville, to obtain comments on a proposal by the Burnsville fire department, 14011 Burnhaven Dr., for a license to operate an advanced life support transportation service in Roseville. For mcre information, call 291-6352. MARCIA BENNETT RECEIVES NATIONAL AWARD Metropolitan Council Member Marcia Bennett received a national award for her "significant contribution to the regional planning movement" May 9 in Searle, Wash. Eenne~ received the Tom Bradley Regional Leadership Award, presented annually by the National Association of Regic C.?.Jncils to a local government policymaker. It is named ,~, Lcs Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley. Bennett recently resigned from the Council because she has taken a job as Anoka County intergovernmental coordinator. She will serve until the governor names a replacement. APPLICA'TtONS OPEN FOR NEW TRANSIT BOARD The Secretary of State's Office is accepting applications for positions on the new Regional Transit Board. The 15-member board will be made up of a chair selected by the governor and 14 members selected by the Council to represent regional 'ansit districts {see map). The board will plan transit services within the Twin Region and implement the Council's long-term transit plans. The Council will hold 14 public hearings in June on the applicants. The public hearing for the transit board chair will be held Wednesday, June 6, 7 p.m. in the Council offices. Applicants for chair will also be heard June 7. immediately following the June 6 hearing, a public hearing will be held for applicants from Dist. A. ~ Applications must be received by June 6. The Council will make the appointments July 12. Forms may be obtained from ',o-.- the Secretary of State's Office, 296-3266. For more information, call Bill Lester at 291-6630. The remaining hearings, all set for 7 p.m., will be held as follows: June 7, Diet. B- Linwood Open School, 1023 Osceola AV.o St. Paul. June 11, Dist. C--Roseville City Hall, Police Training Room, Lexington and County Rd. C., St. Paul. June 12, Dist. D--Regina High School, Room 116, 4225 3rd Av. S., Minneapolis. June 13, Di~t. E.--Sou;h High School, Room 101, 3131 19th Ay. S., Minneapolis. June 14, Dist. F--Hennepin County Government Center, Meeting Room A, level A, 300 S. 6th St., Minneapolis. June 18, Dist. G--Fridley City Hall, Classroom (basement level), 6431 University Av., Fridley. June 19, Dist. H--Brooklyn Center City Hall, Council Chambers, 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy., Brooklyn Center. June 20, Dist. l--St. Louis Park City Hall, Community Room (fi~t level), 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park. June 21, Dist. J--Richfield Community Center, General Room, 7000 Nicollet Av., Richfield. June 25, Dist. K -West St. Paul City Hall, ConferenCe Room, 1616 Humboldt Av., West St. Paul. June 26, Dist. L--White Beer Lake City Hall, Council Chambers, orth BIdg., 44320 Cook Ay., White Bear Lake. 27, Dict. M --Hopkins City Hall, Council Chambers, 010 S.lst St., Hopkins. June 28, Dist. N --Burnsville City Hall, Council Chambers, 1313 E. Hwy. 13, Burn~ville. R~:~IONAI. TRANSIT SOARO COUNCIL OFFERS AFFORDABLE HOUSING EDUCATION PROGRAM '~Vhere will our children live?" This is the theme of a Metropolitan Council affordable housing education program offered upon request to local civic groups. The 45-minute program examines today's housing market and the need to provide affordable housing. Information kits and booklets provide information on a variety of housing issues. For more information, call housing planners Guy Peterson or Aaa Stern at 291-6472. NEW PUBLICATIONS Housing Vacancy and Turnover in the Twin C/ties Morro- po/iran Area, January-March 1984. April 1984. Data-log says vacancy rate in first quarter was 1.9 percent (13,399 units), down from 2.2 percent from same period in 1983. No. 19- 84-064; 8 pp.; S1. Summary, Regional Service and Finance Study, Phase 2. April 1984. Summarizes Metropolitan Council's findings and recommendations from two-year study that examined the )rovision and financing of regional services, such as transit, iirports, sewers, parks and solid waste dispcsal. No. 02-84- )48; 12 pp.; S1. Twin C/des Area Emergency Medical Services Program: An Evaluation. April 1984. Analyzes strengths and weaknesses of program, which operated ~[rom 1977 to 1982..According to survey done for evaluation, the program was considered "ef%c:ive" or "ve~/effective" in improving coordination and ~quality of rec~ionat emergency systems by 96 percent of people ~clIect..~c. 51 ~33-009; 65 OP.; S2.50. COMING MEETINGS (May 21 - 29) (Meeffngs are tentative. To verify, ca//291-E464.) Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commit-tee, Monday, May 21,3 p.m., Ccuncil C~.ambers. Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority Advisory Committee Meeting, Tuesday, May 22, 9 a.m., HRA Conference Room LL25 (Lower Level Metro Square). Metropolitan Systems Commi~ee, Tuesday, May 22, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. University Av./Southwest Corridors Study Steering Committee, Tuesday, May 22, 3 p.m., Council Chambers. Environmental Resources Commit'tee, Wednesday, May 23, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Metropolitan Health Planning Board, Wednesday, May 23, 4 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan and Community Development Committee, Thursday, May 24, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Council, Thursday, May 24, 4 p.m., Council Chambers. Aviation Policy Plan Task Force, Friday, May 25, 9 a.m., St. Paul Downtown Airport. Metropolitan Waste Management Committee, Tuesday, May 29, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Systems Commit-tee, Tuesday, May 29, 3 p.m., Conference Rcom E. 300 Metro Square Bldg., St. Paul, MN 55101 General Office Telephone (612) 291-6359 c A Metropolitan Council Bulletin for Community I MI3U~_ H~ '~P U ~L' gJ-J EA._ R I N CS, PUBL RECENT COUNCIL ACTIONS (May 14-25) IC MEETINGS Transportation-The Council approved a request by the Metropolitan Transit Commission for $19.4 million in federal funding for fiscal year 1984. The grant would be spent on 88.5 million in operating assistance and 11 capital purchases including the replacement of 69 buses. Three more Twin Cities firms have joined the ranks of United States and foreign firms expressing interest in building a fast-transit connection between downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul. Kellogg Corp. and Project One, Inc., both of Minne- apolis, and The Personal Rapid Transit Corp., St. Paul, sub- mitted proposals to the Council. Another Twin Cities firm, Davy McKee Corp., proposed a personal rapid transit system before an earlier deadline. Three other proposals received by the May 15 deadline bring the total the Council is reviewing to 11. Sewage Treatment-The Council withdrew its request to the Metropolitan Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to modify its sewage discharge permit for the Maple Plain sewage treat- ment plant. The Council also decided to notify the MPCA that the Council supports the phase-out of the plant and construc- tion of an interceptor sewer to an existing line in Long Lake. Housing-The Council said a housing bond plan amend- .. ment proposed by Minnetonka is consistent with Council guidelines. The city plans to issue approximately $15 million in tax~xempt revenue bonds to finance a 318-unit apartment complex. The housing is proposed for an area near the inter- section of Smetana and 11th Ars. The Council suggested the city initiate efforts to ensure that 20 percent of the units are reserved for tenants with Iow and moderate incomes for at least 10 years. Aircraft Noise-The Council advised the Federal Aviation Administration of Council support for a petition that prohibits the manufacture and registration of aircraft that do not meet proposed, more stringent, aircraft noise regulations. The petition was developed by the National Organization to Insure a Sound-Controlled Environment and the Airport Operators Council International. The regulations would apply to jet transports scheduled to begin flying in 1986 or later. Racetrack-The Council told Shakopee that a final environ- mental impact statement on a 390-acre racetrack site there- adequately addresses expected impacts, especially traffic con- gestion problems. However, the Council said any hazardous wastes associated with the proposed project should be identified. Air Quality-The Council decided to request proposals from consultants to revise an air quality control plan for transportation at the intersection of Shelling and University Avs.'in St. Paul. Traffic at the intersection continues to violate state and federal carbon monoxide standards. The study, estimaled to cost no more than S30,000, is expected to be comp!eted by Oct. 31, 1984. Solid Waste-The Council has set a public meeting for 7 p.m., Tuesday, June 5, at the Newport City Hall, 596 7th Av., Newport:, to hear public comment on an environmental assessment worksheet, pub. no. 12-84-067, and on the need for an environmental impact statement on a waste processing facility proposed by Waste-to-Energy, Inc. in Newport. For a copy of the worksheet, call 291-6464. If you plan to speak at the meeting, call 291.6447. GARDEBRING SETS BREAKFAST MEETINGS WITH LOCAL OFFICIALS Metropolitan Council chair Sandra Gardebring has scheduled a series of regional meetings with local officials in each of the seven counties plus Minneapolis and St. Paul. The meetings are an opportunity to discuss problems of mutual concern and future directions for the Council. The "Dutch treat" breakfast meetings, 7:30 to ~.30 a.m., will be as follow; - June 20; Dakota County; Jimmy's, 14996 Glazier Ay. (corner of 142nd St. and Cedar Ay.), Apple Valley. -- June 22; Washington County; Lake Elmo Inn, 3442 Lake Elmo Ay. N., Lake Elmo. -- June 27; Anoka County; Dolphin Restaurant Bar ~nd Lounge, 17646 NE. Hwy. 65,Ham Lake. -- June 29; Hennepin County; Copper Kettle Re~aurant, 225 Central Ay., Osseo. -- July 11; Carve~ County; J's Family Restaurant. 222 Cheztnut St., Cha~a. - July 13; Scott County; Laker$ Restaurant, Hwy. 13, Prior Lake. - July 18; Ramsay County; Holiday Inn, 1780 E. County Rd. D., Maplewood. Dates and locations for the Minneapolis and St. Paul meetings will be announced. If you plan to a~end, please notify the Council at 291-6461. APPLICATIONS OPEN FOR NEW TRANSIT BOARD The Secretary of State's Office is accepting applications for positions on the new Regional Transit Board. The 15-member board will be made up of a chair selected by the governor and 14 members selected by the Council to represent regional transit districts, The board will plan transit services within the Twin Cities Region and implement the Council's long-term transit plans. The Council will hold 14 public hearings from June 7 through June 28 on the applicants. Applications must be received by June 6. The Council will make its appointments July 12. Forms may be obtained from the Sec;_-tary of State" Office, 296-3266. Far more information, ~il Bill Lester at 291-6830. COUNCIl TO HOLD TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLANNERS' FORUM Satellite dishes, antenna farms, and microwave broadcast towers will be the focus of a telecommunications planners' forum sponsored by the Metropolitan Council June 12. The meeting will be held from 9 to 11:30 a.m. in the Council's Conference Room E. For more information, contact Jim Uttley at 291-6361. MISSISSIPPI REVIVAL TO INCLUDE RIVER CLEANUP, ISLAND FESTIVAL · People interested in making the Mississippi River a beautiful, trash-free waterway are invited to participate in the Mississippi River Revival, Saturday, July 14. Revival organizers are lining up a canoe flotilla and land crews to pick up trash along the river between Showboat Landing in Minneapolis and Navy Island in St. Paul. Churches, neighborhood organizations, youth groups, area businesses-everyone is welcome to join the crew. A weekend of river-related events culminates in a festival at St. Paul's Navy Island, Sunday, July 15. For infor. marion, call Bill Zachman at 874-8139. COUNCIL OFFERS AFFORDABLE HOUSING EDUCATION PROGRAM "Where will our children live?" This is the theme of a Metropolitan Council affordable housing education program offered upon request to local civic groups. The 45-minute program examines today's housing market and the need to provide affordable housing. Information kits and booklets provide information on a variety of housing issues. For more information, call housing planners Guy Peterson or Aha Stern at 291-6472. NEW PUBLICATIONS Hospital Acute Care Use in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, 1952 and 1983. May 1984. On average, more than 4 in every 10 licensed hospital beds in the area's 34 community hospitals were empty in 1983. Hospital use experienced the most dramatic single-year decline- 10 percent-since rates began dropping in the early 1970s. No. 18~4-071; 27 pp.; S1. Housing Construction in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, 1982. April 1984. Housing construction increased nine percent in 1982 over 1981 figures, with permits issued for 12,035 housing units. The largest percentage increase was in multifamily housing. No. 01-84-044; 68 pp.; S2.50. Summary Report, Metropolitan Recreation Demand Study, Winter 1982-1983. May 1984. Summarizes results of winter- time park-user in[erviews at 30 regional parks in the Twin Cities Area. Users were asked their opinion about park fees, crowding and other questions. Surveyed activities included cross-country skiing, snowmobiling, hill sliding and skating. No. 11-84-066; 66 pp.; $2.50. Hearing Report, Cost and Pr/or/t/es Amendment to the Transportation Development Gu/de/Policy Plan. May 1984. Discusses comments made at April 24 hearing and the Council staff's recommendations for revising the amendment. The amendment provides that priorities be prepared for funding future.regional hi_chway and transit projects because of an anticipated long-term revenue shortage. No. 25-84-072; 23 pp.; no charge. Water Use/n the Twin Cities Merropo/itan Area-An Update. May 1984. Report updates 1983 report on water use in region, It includes new information on municipal water supply systems. No. 10-84-068; 61 pp.; S2.50, COMING MEETINGS (June 4.22) (Meetings are tentative. Call 291-6464 to var/ry.) Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, Monday, June 4, 3 p.m., Council Chambers. MetroWater Access Task Force, Tuesday, June 5, 9:30 a.m., Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Metro Region Office, 1200 Warner Rd. University Av./Southwest Corridor Study Steering Com- mittee, Tuesday, June 5, 3 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Systems Committee, Tuesday, June 5, 3 p,m., Conference Room E. Technical Advisory Committee (transportation), Wednesday, June 6, 9 a.m., Council Chambers. Environmental Systems Committee, Wednesday, June 6, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Long-Term Care Task Force, Thursday, June 7, 8 a.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Area River Corridors Study Committee, Thursday, June 7, 12:30 p.m., Conference Room E. Metropolitan and Community Development Committee, Thursday, June 7, 1 p.m., Council Chambers. Management Committee, Thursday, June 7, 3 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, Monday, June 11,3 p.m., Council Chambers. Air Quality Committee, Tuesday, June 12, 10 a.m., Conference Room B. Developmental Disabilities Advisory Committee, Tuesday, June 12, 1 p.m., Conference Rooms C and D. Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Committee, Tuesday, June 12, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Systems Committee, Tuesday, June 12, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Metropolitan Health Planning Board, Wednesday, June 13, 4 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan and Community Development Committee, Thursday, June 14, 2 p.m., Council Chambers, Metropolitan Council, Thursday, June 14, 4 p.m., Council Chambers, Metropolitan Systems Committee, Tuesday, June 19, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Arts Advisory Committee, Tuesday, June 19, 5:15 p.m., Conference Room A. Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority Advisory Committee, Wednesday, June 20, 11 a.m., LL25 (Lower Level). Transportation Advisory Board, Wednesday, June 20, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. Environmental Systems Committee, Wednesday, June 20, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Long-Term Care Task Force, Thursday, June 21,8 a.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan and Community Development Committee, Thursday, June 21,2 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Area River Corridors Study Committee, Thursday, June 21,3 p.m., Conference Room E. Management Committee, Thursday, June 21,3 p.m., Council Chambers. Aging Advisory Committee, Friday, June 22, 9 a.m., Council Chambers. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT, REGULAR MEETING TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL April 25, 1984 The regular meeting of the LakeMinnetonka Conservation District was called to order by Chairman Brown at 7:32 p.m. on Wednesday, April 25, 1984 at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. Members present: Richard Garwood (Deephaven), Carl Weisser* (Excelsior), Robert Brown (Greenwood), Alan Fasching (Minnetrista), JoEllen Hurr (Orono), Robert Rascop (Shorewood), Ron Kraemer (Spring Park), Ed Bauman (Tonka Bay), and Audrey Gisvold (Wayzata). Communities represented: Nine (9). *Arrived late. Hurr Moved, Fasching Seconded that the minutes of the March 28, 1984 meeting be approved. Motion, Ayes (8), Nays (0). Hurr Moved, Garwood Seconded that the Treasurer's report be accepted and the bills paid. Motion, Ayes (8), Nays (0). The meeting was adjourned at 7:34 p.m. for the public hearing regarding seaplanes; the meeting resumed at 8:27 p.m. LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Garwood reported that the committee reviewed a · Special Event Permit application by Chaska Marina for a boat show, and recommended approval with stipulations. The committee reviewed the Code amendment establishing certification of charter boats.on the Lake, and recommended adoption. The committee reviewed the buoy maintenance program for 1984, including the inspection for the month of May. The committee reviewed with the Water Patrol the traffic-flow control signs in the Lord Fletcher lagoon, and was advised that the control program will be continued in 1984. The committee also discussed the scheduled public hearing regarding seaplanes. Rascop Moved, Bauman Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Bauman Moved, Gisvold Seconded that the Special Event Permit applica- tion by Chaska Marina for a boat show at Stonewings on May 12 and 13 be approved with the following stipulations: 1. professional guards be on duty to prevent other use of the area, 2. all slips be used for display purposes only, CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE MINUTES TREASURER'S REPORT SEAPLANES HEARING SP EVENT: CHASKA BOAT SHOW 1571 LMCD Board Minutes April 25, 1984 Page 2 3. the area be appropriately signed nine days in advance of the show, 4. no boat access be allowed to the area, the area be roped off with swimming-area type controls between 12 noon Friday and 8 p.m. on Sunday, 6. this is a before-season promotion and no boat parking will be allowed, and 7. permit is granted on a one-time basis only without intending precedent for future District obligation. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRO~fENT COMMITTEE: Rascop reported that the committee reviewed and made recommendations on the following public hearing reports: 1. Walters Port - DUA variance and new dock license - for alproval. 2. Chaska Marina - variance and dock license amendment - tabled for 30 days. Greenhouse Eatery - Special Density, variance, and new dock license - for approval with the stipulations that a shallow- water variance be granted only as necessary, and that no boat storage be allowed in the shallow-water area if established. 4. A1 & Alma's - Special Density, DUA variance, and new dock license - for approval. 5. Lord Fletchers - Special Density and dock license amendment for storage of a charter boat - for denial. 6. Martin & Son - variance and dock license amendment - for approval with stipualtions. 7. Sailors World - Special Density, setback variance, and dock license amendment - for denial. In Other matters the committee discussed future public hearings, will call a special meeting to review District Mooring Area policy, and recommended that the District reaffirm its earlier resolution opposing -the establishment of a landfill in the City of Minnetrista. Fasching Moved, Garwood Seconded that the committee report be accepted. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). SP EVENT :- CHASKA BOAT SHOW (cont) LMCD Board Minutes April 25, 1984 Page 3 Hurr Moved, Bauman Seconded that the Walters Port applications be approved, providing for setback variance on the southeast side, estab- lishing a common dock-use-area in agreement with the plan submitted, and a new dock license for 5 WAU. Motion, Ayes (8), Nays (1), Fasching voting Nay. Hurt Moved, Gisvold Seconded that the Greenhouse Eatery applications for Special Density Permit, variance, and new dock license'be returned · to committee. Motion, Ayes (8), Nays (0). Hurt Moved, Rascop Seconded that the A1 & Alma's applications be approved as follows: 1. Special Density Permit granted based upon the following amenities being provided: A. Public Access (Group A) (1) Additional slips for restaurant services B. Public Service (Group C) (1) Separate charter boat facility (2) Public toilet facilities (3) Parking for charter boat service C. Other Amenities (Group D) (1) Protection for the swinnning area (2) Two to three dock attendants on duty during peak hours (3) Public telephone D. Other Factors (Group E) (1) "No Parking" signs on the west side of the west dock. (2) Picket fence on the west side of the west dock. (3) Any other amenities needed in the future to prevent encroachment into the swimming area or the dock-use-area to the west. 2. Dock-use-area variance granted to provide a fenced dock between the transient facility and the city swimming area, based on the following hardship: A. converging lot lines, and B. need to protect the swimming area from boat encroachment. 3. New dock license granted: A. transient storage increased from 15 WAU to 20 WAU, WALTERS PORT GREENHOUSE EATERY AL & A~MA's LMCD Board Minutes April 25, 1984 Page 4 B. an additional 4 WAU on the lot north of the swimming area for charter-boat storage facility, C. transient docks not to be used for charter boat customers, D. need to maintain a 15' setback on the west side, and E. certified as-built survey is required. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Garwood Moved, Hurr Seconded that the Special Density Permit and dock license amendment applications by Lord Fletchers of the Lake to provide charter boat storage at its transient dockage be denied because of the already-congested channel and lagoon area. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Rascop Moved, Bauman Seconded that the Martin & Son Boat Rental appli- cations for dock-use-area variance and license amendment be approved to reconstruct its docks permanently, bringing setbacks into closer con- formity with the LMCD Code, based on converging lot lines, and with the following stipulations: 1. that there be no increase in slip length or in number of boats stored beyond 100' of the 929.4 NGVD shoreline (116' and 3 boats); that a .setback variance be granted on the south side of the south shoreline-slip, for loading and unloading of fishing boats stored on slides; 3. that a 5'-10' setback variance to the lot line on the north be allowed, subject to agreement with the neighbor; and 4. that storage of 4 pontoon boats in the northern dock use area be non-transferable. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Rascop Moved, Garwood Seconded that the applications by Sailors World for Special Density Permit, setback variance, and a dock license amend- ment to provide temporary boat storage on the east side be denied because the facility is already overused. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Rascop Moved, Gisvold Seconded that, to reaffirm its earlier resolution (Resolution No. 37) opposing the establishment of a landfill in the City of Minnetrista, Resolution No. 45 be adopted - a resolution opposing the selection of "Site M" as a potential solid waste landfill site. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). AL & ALMA'S (cont) LORD FLETCHERS MARTIN & SON SAILORS WORLD LANDFILL Res. 45 1577 LMCD Board Minutes April 25, 1984 Page 5 Hurr Moved, Weisser Seconded that the dock license renewal applications be approved for the following: Baycliffe Property Association Crane Island Association, Inc. Eagle Bluff Association Loring Acres Beach Association, Inc. Sailors World Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). CODE AMENDMENT: Hurr Moved, Gisvold Seconded, regarding Ordinance No. 66 relating to charter boat registration, that further readings be waived and that the ordinance be adopted. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). OTHER: Brown reported that the Executive Committee reviewed a proposal from Xerox Corporation to exchange the existing office copier for a newer model, and to provide a Xerox memorywriter. The committee recommended that a newer copy machine not be purchased at this time but that a #627 memorywriter, without trade-in, be authorized for purchase. The committee reviewed the City of Minnetrista's request for support of its opposition to a landfill site within its city limits. The Executive Committee concurred with the Water Structures and Environ- ment Committee and also recommended that the Board support M±nnetrista by adopting a new resolution with appropriate language from LMCD Resolution No. 37 (see Board action above). After discussion, the Executive Committee recommended that its reports be added as a regular item to Board agenda. The committee discussed the DNR's letter of support of the proposed LMCD access-parking program. The matter was continued for further development of the specific program, and for the development of the method of presentation to the communities involved. The committee discussed the need for handling a request for change-in- use of any multiple dock (dock conversions), similar to the way transient facilities are handled. The matter was referred to the dock committee. The committee discussed the need for conducting an annual summer work- shop for Board members to review and further delineate Board policy. Weisser Moved, Hurr Seconded that the purchase of a memorywriter at an estimated cost of $2,200 be approved. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). RENEWAL LICENSES CODE: CHARTER BOATS SU~ER WORKSHOPS OFFICE EQUIPMENT LMCD Board Minutes April 25, 1984 Page 6 The annual Lake inspection tour for Directors is changed from Thursday to Wednesday, July 15. The June dock committee meeting will be held on board Saturday, June 9. The annual boat ride for public officials is scheduled for Saturday, August 4. ADJOURNMENT: Brown Moved, Rascop Seconded at 9:47 p.m. that the meeting be adjourned. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). Submitted by: JoEllen Lo Hurr, Secretary Approved by: Robert Tipton Brown, Chairman LMCD EVENTS 1983 Lake Minnetonka Aerial Boat Saturday 23 July 1983 Compiled by William L. Johnson Survey .... 1~"? ? LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT UNIFORM IDENTI~IOATION Ol~ LAKE MINN~TONKA AREAE (l) Halsteds Bay (22) (2) Priests Bay (23) (3) Cooks Bay (24) (4) West Upper Lake (25) (.~)So~th ~per ~,ake (2~) (~) S=~tato~ ~ay (Z?) (?) ~eZ~s ~ (~) (~) ~t ~ ~e (Z~) (~) O~m~ ~ (~O) (ZO)OZa C~ ~ (~Z) (Z~)S~o~ ~ ~ (~) (Z2)m~ ~e (~) (Z3)~e=~a ~e (~4) (Z4)S~to~ ~ (~) (ZO)~r~o~ ~ (3~) (Z~)~=~s ~ (~) (Z~)We~t ~ (~e) (lS)Forest L~e , (3~) (as)co~ Co~e (%o) (2o)w~t c~t~ B~ (4~) 2i) East Cryst~ B~ (42) North Arm Stubbs Bay Max~ell Bay Lafayette Bay Smiths Bay Tanager Lake Br o~un s Bay ~ayzata Bay Grays Bay Libbs L~ke Robinsons Bay Baj St. Louis Carsons Ba~ St. A!ba.ns Bay Excelsior Bay Gideons Bay Echo Big Island Passage Veterans Baby Lower L~.ke South Lower Lake North August, 1983 October, 1974 Ill ,J L,-'-.,'( E I,',INNE-fOI','IiA COI',,ISERVP"I'IOf~ DISTRICT Action Report of: Public Hearing: Attendance: BARRY KRELITZ - DUA Variance May 16, 1984, Wednesday, 7:30 p.m., Mound City Hall Rascop, Boynton, Elam, Garwood, Gisvold, Hurr, Mixa, Attorney LeFevere, and those on list attached Public Hearing The public hearing was opened at 7:48 p.m. Barry Krelitz appeared to request a length and setback variance to accommodate his dockage and boat located on the south shore of Jennings Bay, LMCD Area 16. Krelitz advised the hearing panel that: 1. Because of shallow water he needed to extend his dock to 82' (19' beyond his present frontage-allowance of 63' 2. His houseboat is 45' long and requires water depth in excess of 5' for safe storage. 3. Setback variance on west side of 1' is needed for lounging bench. 4. Submitted photos. Dorothy Hitchin~s submitted petition in opposition and advised the panel that: 1. We have always maintained 10' setback. 2. Docks do not extend more than 50'. 3. Convex curve of shore would restrict others' access. 4. Would curtail fishing. 5. Lived here 37 years without trouble. Gus Hitchinss, brother, advised: 1. Neighbors are seldom there. 2. Would harm fishing. Rosemary DeGuise, Hitching's neighbor, advised: 1. There is 5' of water out 40'. 2. Where does sewer discharge? 3. There are lots of waterskiers using the area. 4. Lived here 24 years. 5. Have problem with converging lot lines: Lake front with 43', back lot with 56' J. Plate advised: Making a marina of the area. Art Hoefte advised: Don't want to start trend in area. Annetta Krelitz advised: In a democratic society the owner should have the right to choose. Lowell Noteboom, attorney for Krelitz: Could compromise at 72' length. Ail having been heard wishing to be heard, and submittals having been received, the public hearing was closed at 8:17 p.m. LAKE MII,,It,,'.ETO~," KA COf~SERVATIOr,,I DISTRICT Krelitz Public Hearing May 16, 1984 Page 2 Findings 1. Barry Krelitz is applying for a 1' setback variance on the west side to accommodate bench after lining up dock with sidewalk. 2. A 19' length variance (from 63' to 82') is requested to accommodate a slip for a 45' houseboat needing over 5' of water depth. 3. LMCD Code provides that if dock limitations cause a hardship due to shallow water, a variance may be required to reach 3' of water. 4. Krelitz soundings show 3' of water at 15' on 4-15-84, report attached. 5. Lake elevation 4-15-84 was 929.69 NGVD. Recommendations: After review of the public hearing, above, indicating a lack of demonstrated hardship, Hurr Moved, Garwood Seconded, that the hearing panel recommend the variance application of Barry Krelitz be denied. Motion, Ayes (6), Nays (0). I I I I t i APR g 5 1984 L.M.C.D. Depth Soundings at 4920 Glen Elyn Rd April 15, 1984 Feet from Shore Depth 2.5 1.5 ft. 5.0 2.0 7.5 2.2 10.0 2.5 12.5 2.5 15.0 3.0 17.5 3.0 20.0 3.3 22.5 3.4 25.0 3.6 27.5 3.8 30.0 4.0 32.5 - 4.2 35.0 4.3 37.5 4.3 40.0 4.5 42.5 4.5 45.0 4.6 Feet from Shore Depth 4?.5 4.8 ft. 5O.O 4.8 52.5 4.9 55.0 5.0 57.5 5.0 60.0 5.1 62.5 5.2 65.0 5.3 67.5 5.3 70.0 5.4 72.5 5.5 75.0 5.5 77.5 5.7 80.0 5.8 82.5 6.0 85.0 6.2 87.5 6.5 Lake elevation 4-15-84 = 929.69 NGVD APR g 5 1984 L.M.C.D. / o.q P~BB 9 '6' ". 18 - ~ 18 19 '- "-'ZO · - / // / 4920 Glen Elyn Rd. Mound, MN 55364 Practical difficulties requiring variance to LMCD Code: We presently own a 45 foot houseboat which draws 4 feet at the stern. First, the lake shore abutting our property slopes into the lake very gradually such that the depth of the lake is about 5 to 5.5 feet at a point 85 feet from the shore. The mean high to low water variance · may be as much as 1 1/2 feet from spring to fall. Moving the dock system closer to the shore would potentially damage the boat shafts, rudders & propellers during dockage. Further, the potential for grounding may structurally damage the boat hull. Secondly, a tree at the shoreline extends into. the lake in such a fashion that if the boat were drawn closer to shore some branches would come into direct contact with the boat. (We are presently trying to save this tree through p~oper management, to retain the natural beauty along the shoreline). Third, the lateral dimensions of the dock system are designed to allow a minimum of dockage within the slip given that the waters in our area can become very choppy due to the strong north-to-south winds that pound the south shore of Jennings Bay. Also, we have placed a dock seat at the outer end of the slip which extends 8 feet laterally to the slip. This setback at the 84 foot distance is exceeded by 3 feet. This does not adversely affect reasonable access to, or the use of the lake by the public or other owners. It is further used as a mooring area for our sailboat which also draws approximately 4 feet. - slW~ II~no XlsnoI~s pinoa uoI%on~suoo ~oop p~sodo~d ,z~II~=X '~Y'~I ~g~ o~uI ~no ~ssw~n$ ~ Moop ~I~q% PIInq pInoo oqx o~ sw %s~uoo ~no ~oop eIW ~ulpu@~x~ ~q (~A~no x@Auoo @W~ $o ~8~uso ~% ul s~II oq~) z%IIa~ '~li pu~ ~%n~I ~g~ $o ~A~no x~Auoo w uo ~AIi ~A '9 ~ ~uoI~ oi~w~ %~oq ~on~%sqo ~ou op s~oop ~qh hwg~ os pue @~oqs ~g% o~ ISll~d s~oop ~q% $o ~pls%no ~W~ o2 dn 1End u~o s~oq ~qh os ~s$ aapri o~ pu~ a~oqs aq~ ohul ~oo oh moo~ aA~g ilia :suos~s~ ~no$ ~uiaoilo~ sub ao$ aou~t~ ~oop w uons $o '~}i ~q p~sanb@~ aoueI~wA uo~hon~%suoo ~oop e $o ~uyhu~ sub o~ se L ,MC~. BOARD MEMBERS Robe~l Tipton Brown, Chairman Greenwood Robert P. Rascop, Vice Chairman Shorewood JoEllen Hurr. Secretary Orono Edward G. Sauman, Treasurer Tonka Bay Donald E. Boynton Minnetonka Beach Jonathan R. Elam Mound Alan Fasching Minnetrista Richard J. Garwood Deephaven Audrey Gisvold Wayzata IRon Kraemer Spring Park Robe~ K. Pillsbury Minnetonka Roberl E. SIocum Woociland Richard J Soclerberg Victoria Carl H. Weisser Excelsior LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 ..~,'~-~ /~ ;~y 31, 198q A1 & Alma's Supper Club c/o Daryl & Merritt Geyen 5201 Piper Road Mound, M~ 55364 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Geyen: Subject: 1984 Multiple Dock and Mooring Area License The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors has approved your multiple dock license for the 1984 season. The license, including any LMCD stipulations, is enclosed. We appreciate your. cooperation in helping to "Save the Lake." Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Frank Mixa Executive Director jm Enc: License, site plan, stips cc/enc: Municipality .- ;';;z,-~.,.,-~~ LMCD Inspector Fred Bame D.N.R. DISTRICT TELEPHONE 61214?3-7033 FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NO. o.oo 84-01 V 20 + 4 Units MULTIPLE DOCK AND MOORING AREA LICENSE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ss. WHEREAS, AL & ALMA'S SUPPER CLUB 5201 Piper Road, City of Mound has paid the sum of One Hundred Thirty and no/100 ($130,00) DOLLARS to the Treasurer of said LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT as required by the Ordinances of said District and complied with all the requirements of said Ordinances necessary for obtaining this License: NOW, THEREFORE, By order of the Board of Directors of said District and by virtue hereof, the said A1 & Alma' s Supper Club is hereby licensed and authorized to operate a multiple dock subject to existing and future density policies and regulations adopted by the District's Board of Directors, and subject to Special Dengity Permit approved 4-25-84 and to variance order approved 4-25-84 for the period of the 1984 dock . season and ending December 31, 1984 subject to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances. An)' special event requires a special permit. Violations of the provisions of the District's Code of Ordinances are punishable by imprisonment for not more than 90 days or imposition of a fine of not more than $7IK). or both. ../ Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the LAKE MINNETONKA CONSF_.RVAT1ON D1STRICI this 25th Savor April A,D. 19 84. (__~./'~ / <'- Att Executive DirectOr Frank ~lixa Chairman R6b?r~.' 7ipton Brmm LMCD Board Minutes April 25, 1984 Page 3  rr Moved, Rascop Seconded that the A1 & Alma's applications be proved as follows: 1. Special Density Permit granted based upon the following amenities being provided: A. Public Access (Group A) (1) Additional slips for restaurant services B. Public Service (Group C) (1) Separate charter boat facility (2) Public toilet facilities (3) Parking for charter boat service C. Other Amenities (Group D) (1) Protection for the swimming area (2) Two to three dock attendants on duty during peak hours (3) Public telephone D. Other Factors (Group E) (1) "No Parking" signs on the west side of the west dock. (2) Picket fence on the west side of the west dock. (3) Any other amenities needed in the future to prevent encroachment into the swimming area or the dock-use-area to the west. Dock-use-area variance granted to.provide a fenced dock between the transient facility and the city swimming area, based on the following hardship: A. converging lot lines, and B. need to protect the swimming area from boat encroachment. 3. New dock license granted: A. transient storage increased from 15 WAU to 20 WAU, B. an additional 4 WAU on the lot north of the swi~ing area for charter-boat storage facility, C. transient docks not to be used for charter boat customers, D. need to maintain a 15' setback on the west side, and E. certified as-built survey is required. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0). 0 0 1'13 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FIN/~NCtAL SPECIALISTS FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 612) FILE: Financial Specialists: Ehlers and Associates, Inc. Please distribute to governing body members June 1, 1984 Newsletter Interest rates rose largely due to the prospect of larger federal deficits and borrowing, but tax exempt rates did not follow immediately. However, commencing the week of May ? even these rates rose dramatically in sympathy. As of May l?, the Bond Buyer Index for yields on 20-Year bonds was 10.36%, compared to 9.98% on March 15. In early May a well-known commentator said that interest rates would rise sharply if the federal deficit is not resolved and that Congress seems unable to address this problem in this election year. While all fixed obligations suffered, tax exempts suffered less. This reflects a reduced supply of tax exempts for private financings, and the tax exempt/taxable yield spread is widening. Recently Ed Kerman, Vice President, and Tom Hines, Analyst, from Moody's Investors Service were here at the invitation of the Minnesota State Auditor to address over 100 municipal finance directors. We spent a good deal of time making some on-site inspections at New Ulm, Belle Plaine, Winthrop, Gaylord, Arlington, Victoria, West St. Paul, Eden Prairie, South St. Paul and Cottage Grove. Moody's has agreed to participate in additional sessions for those, including school and county people, unable to attend the most recent conference. These will be held on May 29, ll:30 A.M. to 3:30 P.M. at the Thunderbird in Bloomington and again on May 31 at the Savery Hotel, Des Moines, between ll:30 A.M. and 3:00 P.M. with on-site_visits in between. Look for your invitation and get back to us. Acceptances will be first come, first serve. At a well-attended Minnesota Association of School Business Officials' conference, Carolyn Drude presented the "Minnesota Miracle". Many said they had not realized the dramatic impact of income-related (not poverty-related) refunds on property taxes. Ehlers and Associates have the only computer program that quickly and accurately provides the net cost of any bond issue or tax levy proposal for any range of residential property values owned by families with any variety of incomes. Less than 10% of voters understand this, but those who do strongly favor local revenue issues. You need us if you have a bond issue or levy proposal. Voter profile surveys are becoming a necessity for the proper management of local governments. We find that voters are much different from what managers and elected officials often suppose. EhlerS and Associates have conducted a number of surveys in which profile/attitude questions are related to an action question. By asking the proper questions, many voters are stimulated to take a greater and better interest in local affairs. If you are interested in the Voter Profile Survey, do contact us. Looking forward to seeing many of you in June, we are Very truly yours, EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert L. Ehlers 7 leaBue of minnesota cities May 31, 1984 TO: FROM: RE: Ma~Managers, & Clerks J~l~nik, Legislative Counsel Highway Jurisdiction Study Commission Hearings. Few cities in the State are financially able to accept more roads into their municipal system yet that is what may occur as a result of the work of the State HighwayStu~ Commission. Created by the 1983 legislature, the Highway Study Commission is charged with evaluating the classification of roads and recommending possible changes in jurisdiction. The Citizens League has recommended that the state highway system be- reduced from approximately 12,000 miles to 7,500. The cost of transferring approximately 1,000 miles to city and township jurisdiction in one study was estimated at 7 million dollars annually! The prospect of a potential shift of responsibility from the state to local governments of upwards of thirty-five million dollars annually should concern all city officials. Wh.at Sou should do. Make a point of testifying, or having your city engineer testify, at the regional hearings conducted'by the State Highway Study Commission. Information on the time and location of these hearings as well as what items local officials should focus on in their testimony is enclosed. A few hours spent at these hearings may save your city thousands of dollars. Please try to attend. Enclosures JJ:ss Bob Jensen District 36B Dakota-Le Sueur-Scott Counties Committees; IGeneral Legislation and Veterans Affairs Gaming Division Regulated Industries Transportation Vice-Chairman ....... Minnesota House of Representatives '~~ Harry A. Sleben, Jr., Speaker May 25, 1984' NOTICE OF HEARINGS STATE HIGHWAY STUDY COMMISSION Representative Bob Jensen, Chairman The State Highway Study Commission will hold a series of hearings throughout Minnesota as listed below, in order to receive input from citizens concerning the commission study. The commission was formed as part of the Highway Funding Act of 1983 (Chapter 17) to study, in general, the size and classification of the state's highways and whether changes are warranted. A complete descrip- tion of the commission's duties is attached. Citizens and local officials are invited and encouraged to attend to ide the commission with information and opinions that will be useful the study. The hearing shedule is as follows: June 7, 1984 - Thursaa¥ 1:30 p.m. Windom, Minnesota National Guard Armory - 1049 Fifth Avenue 7:30 p.ln. Owatonna, Minnesota City Council Chambers - 540 West Hills Circle June 28, 1984 - Thursday 2:00 p.m. 7:30 p.m. Grand Rapids, Minnesota Davies Hall - Itasca Community College Highway 169 East Bemidji, Minnesota Holiday Inn - Birch Room - Highway 2 West June 29, 1984 - Friday 1:30 p.m. Wadena, Minnesota High School Cafeteria - Highway 29 West OVER Reply to: [] 167 State Office Building, St. Paul, M, innesota 55155 Off:ce: (6t2) 29E-0527/~/~ Home: (t312) [] 17995 Flagstaff Avenue West, Farmington, Minnesota 55024 Duties of the State ~ighway Study Commission as Defined in Minnesota Statutes 161.081~ Section 14, Subdivision 2 Sec. 14. ~(HIGHWAY STUDY COMMISSION.) Subdivision 1. (MEMBERSHIP.) A highway study commission is created to consist of five members of the House of Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House, five members of the Senate appointed by the Senate Committee on Committees, and eight members appointed by the Governor. Of the members appointed by the Governor two must be county commissioners, two must be township supervisors, two must be mayors of cities over 5,000 population, two must be mayors of cities under 5,000 population and not more than one member may reside in any one congressional district. The commis- sion shall select from its membership a chairman and other officers it deems necessary. Subd. 2. (DUTIES OF COMMISSION.) The commission shall study: A functional classification of all roads in the state of Minnesota, using criteria established by the United States Department of Transportation and such other cri- teria as are deemed necessary by the commission. In classifying roads the commission shall make use of work already done by regional development commission · and the Metropolitan Council. The existing jurisdiction of all roads in the.state and their appropriate jurisdiction based on functional classification. The attitudes of local units of government toward changes in highway jurisdiction. Potential obstacles to transfers of highway jurisdic- tion, including transfers of support facilities and maintenance personnel. Changes in the constitutional distribution of highway user funds which may be required as a part of any transfer of jurisdiction. Existing and potential government structures to accom- plish jurisdictional transfers on a continuing basis. 7. Timetables for implementing any jurisdictional transfers. HIGHWAY STUDY COMMISSION STATUS REPORT So far the Commission has held seven meetings and heard from the Department of Transportation, the Association of Township Officers, the City and County Engineers Association, highway jurisdiction task forces of the Metropolitan Council and the East Central Regional Development Commissions, and from the Citizens. League. In future meetings the Commission will hear from other metropolitan counties, the League ~f Cities, the Association of Counties and potentially affected personnel and law enforcement groups as well'as.from interested citizens, and officials in a series of outstate hearings. The Commission has not itself made any findings or reached any conclusions but it has heard a number of significant observations and suggestions. These include: 1) Minnesota has the fifth-highest total of roads and streets in the country but some of its other comparisons with other states are not as far out of line. Minnesota is 19th in the country in state highway -- miles, and 39th in the percent of all highway miles which are.om the' state system. The state is 14th in total miles per capita but.31st in state miles per capita. It is 26th in total miles per square mile and 33rd in state miles per square mile. It seems that where Minnesota seems, out of line it is because of the total area of the state and the -- number' of non-trunk highway'miles, particularly town roads~ 2) Functional classification studies suggest that many miles of roads in Minnesota are under inaRpropriate Jurisdiction. Fewer than half the. miles .of the trunk highway system are principal arterials,-~hile counties have over 700 miles of arterial highways and cities have over 300 miles. 3) The benefits of realigning highway Jurisdiction'include greater equity among taxpayers and a greater likelihood that roads will get an appropriate level of attention in both maintenance and construction planning. The benefits do not necessarily include large cost savings or a net reduction in the total miles of roads and streets 'in the state. The major elements of highway cost are independent of highway Jurisdiction, and the main reason for the existence of almost all low-classification ro~ds, that of access to property, c'annot be changed by jurisdictional realignment. There is potentially a sizeable amount of interest at the regional level in jurisdiction transfers because of a desire for highway. systems more closely based on functional classification, but-also some' apprehension at the local level that extensive transfers might have unintended consequences, such as placing an added financial burden on local government. John Williams House Research Department HIGHWAY STUDY COMMISSION: ISSUES / The issue of highway Jurisdiction -- who should own the roads -- has been'an issue in Minnesota at least since 1920, when a constitutional amendment created the nucleus of the present trunk highway system. In 1933 the system was expanded to approximately its current size and since then several studies have suggested reasons for reducing the size of the state system by from one-third to almost one-half. In both metropolitan and outstate areas task forces have been examining highway Jurisdiction with the intention of making recommendations on transferring highway ownership. Among the problems which have been identified in the existing system are: There is often a discrepancy between the ownership of a road and the function it serves -- for instance, essentially local roads being owned by the state and'roads of statewide importance being the responsibility of counties. Decisions on roads are often made at the wrong level of government, such as when a road that might be upgraded if the decision were up to the county lies unimproved because it is not of such importance on the state system. -- A substantial part of the state highway system is inadequately preserved because of the imbalance between the size of the system and the amount of money available to spend, on it. - The Highway Study COmmission was cre~ted 'by the 1983 Legislature to study 'these issues and report to the 1985 Legislature.. It has been meeting since the fall of 1983 and has heard from representatives of state and local road' authorities, citizens and highway-user groups and regional highway Jurisdiction task forces. In its outstate hearings and'in future meetings the Study Commission will be looking for the answers to a number of questions, including: Is the Minnesota road system in general, and the state highway system in particular, too large for the amount of tax dollars available to support it? ~' ~%at factors should, determine whether a road belongs on the state system or on a local system? 3.' What are the benefits and costs of Jurisdictional transfers? If Jurisdictional transfers are desirable, how should they be accomplished? Would transfers of highways from state to local jurisdiction mean a shift of the tax burden away from highway user taxes and onto property taxes? oh= Williams House Research Department oo~ st sm~sfs ~x~s pu~ p~oa I~O~ s,w~os~uu!R ~wq~ ~a~!I~q noK oG 'L '9 o~q KI!a~$soo~u uot~o!ps!an~ iwooI o~ sXw~Rg!R o~s $o ao~su~x~ w PlnO~ oR~ uo guoIoq XIIWOtgoI RoIR~ woa~ anoX ul ~pwoa I~oI ~u~ ~aoR~ ~a~ ~mo~sKs IWOOI w uo ~ao~ Xoq~ ~I P~A°admt ~uloq ~o ~ou~qo ao~oq ~ ~A~R pIno~ q~tg~ ~oz~ zno~ uI s~q~tq ~unz~ ~u~ ozoq~ ~aV gmo~sXs ieooi w ao ma~sKs oqn uo s! pwoa w aoq~oqn ~uIma~op pInoqs 'uoluido anoK uI 'sao~nw~ 'g uol~ow Kuw u~M~ uotsslmmoo ~uomdoIoAOP Iwuol~oz zo X~unoo 'X~to :noK swH -! S'IYIDI&&O %VOO% MO& SNOI%S~R~ oq~ no ~q pinoqs pwoa ~ ~I ~u!ulmao~oP zo~ spawpu~s oq~ oq pInoqs ~wqM zmossXs Xwaq~tq Mun=~ oq~ mao~ poddoap Suloq ~o ~oaw oR~ UI soI~lunmmoo poz!s-mnyp~m puw II~ms uo ~owdmt oR~ ~q PInom ~u~ Z~u~muaoAog ~o I~A~I Suoan ~q~ Xq p~.~o ~a~ X~q~ ~sn~o~q soIA.~os ~o I~A~I aodoad oq~ ~uIAl§ ~ou oa~ q~lqa ~o~ ~q~ ut sp~oa ~u~aodmt ~a~q~ ~a¥ .£ Zsata~snpul ao~em ,s~oa~ oq~ uo aA~q s~a~sKs ieooI o~ ma~sXs a~s moa~ Sallm ~zaq~lq ~o aa~suea~ ~uz~l~tu~ls e plnoa '~u~ ~l '~oa~a 'Z 'I 'DiM 'RDMM]q]40D ~0 SMRRI4VHD MO& SNOI%SM~O Sure,dasd u~ noX ~s~ss~ o~ suo~san5 aId~s 6u~oIIO~ u0!ss! o buo ¥ S~NIT~GI~D XNO~IAS~ STATE HIGHWAY STUDY COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP Representatives Home · Office Bob Jensen Chairman 17995 Flagstaff Avenue West Farmington, MN 55024 (612) 463-8010 167 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-0527 Glen Anderson Route 1, Box 9 Bellingham, MN 56212 (612) 568-2573' 292 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-4228 Virgil Johnson Rural Route 2, Box 88 Caledonia, MN 55921 (507) 896-3858 374 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-1069 Chuck Hoffman 2250 Orwell Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 (612) 439-7757 266 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-2999 Kathleen Blatz -Senators 9701 Portland Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 (612) 884-8679 Home 394 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-4218 Office Clarence Purfeerst Vice-Chairman Route 1 Faribault, MN 55021 (507) 334-6688 303 State Capitol St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-4167 Pat Kronebusch Box 105 Rollingstone, MN 55969 (507) 689-2559 133 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-1945 Keith Langseth Rural Route 2, Glyndon, MN 56547 (218) 498-2580 G-24 State Capitol St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-3205 Bob Schmitz 6730 Old Highway 169 Boulevard Jordon, MN 55352 (612) 492-2182 235 State Capitol St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-7157 Gene Waldorf 1176 Orange Avenue East St. Paul, blN 55106 (612) 777-O919 G-24 State Capitol St. Paul, bin 55155 (612) 296-7157 -OVER- ~itizen Members Joseph F. Fogarty John Hamilton Carol Kamper Dr. Daniel P. Kelly Colleen Marschall Paul Nieman, Jr. Robert J. Weisenburger C~ L. Wyczawski taff ouse: Steve Loeding Rochelle Polansky John Williams Home 8039 - llS~h S~ree: South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 (612) 459-3940 7220 Harriet Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 (612) 938-5511 2204 Valkyrie Drive Northwest Rochester, MN 55912 (507) 285-8115 Box 278 Keewatin, MN 55753 (218) 263-5606 23315 Hampton Boulevard Hampton, MN' 55031 (612) 437-9026 Little Falls, MN (612) 745-2275 5554 Lakeview Avenue White Bear Lake, MN (612) 331-3873 56345 55110 912 South Minnesota Street New Ulm, M~.._56~l~ .... (507) 354-4411 Washington County Commissioner blayor, City of Richfield Olmstead County Commissioner Mayor, City of Keewa'tin Mayor, City of Hampton Township Supervisor Township Supervisor Mayor, City of Sew Ulm Transportation Committee Administrator 178 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Transportation Committee Secretary Legislative Analyst, House Research Department Room ll - State Capitol St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-5091 (612) 296-4293 (6i2) 296-5045 WUrSt, PEARSON, HAMILTON, LArSON ~ UNDERWOOD ~00 F'~RS''r BAN~ ~AC£ WEST mINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTa 5540:~ June 6, 1984 Mr. Eldo Scbanidt, Chairman Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Mound 5005 Woodridge Road Mound, PtN 55364 Re: Town Square Redevelopment Project - Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority Dear Eldo: This will confirm that you have contacted me and have asked for a general layout as to what will be necessary to put the proposed Town Square Redevelopment Project and Tax Increment Financing into a proper form to comply with the state statutes. The method of redeveloping a portion of downtown Mound has been determined to be a redevelopment project under Minnesota Statutes Section 462.515 and Sections 273.73, Subd. 10 and 273.74. What this in effect means is that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Mound will be the governmental agency carrying out the redevelopment project. This means that the agency which you chair must comply with all the provisions of Chapter 462 and ~Chapter 273 so that the plan-will be properly adopted, tax increments can be calculated, financing can be arranged, and the bonds can be repaid. I am enclosing herewith a checklist of all the reauired proceedings which are necessary for the issuance of tax increment general obligation redevelopment bonds, and ! have discussed these points with Mark Koeg!er, the HRA's planninE adviser. This is going to require some accumulation of old resolutions and other things from the HRA, but I believe everything is in proper order. You also sent me some preliminary material on the Town Square project and asked me to review that and give you and the HRA my. co~ents in writing. Subsequent to our discussions, ~lark Koegler called and indicated that the plan was proceedinE and nhat he was presenting a proposed develooment project and tax increment financing plan to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and thac said plan carries a date of May 21, 198~. He sent me a coov of that plan on ~ay 25, 1984, and Jon ~lam called ~e on June I, 19~1, and asked me te expedite my review. I do not have the resolution WWRST, PEA~5ON, HAMILTON, LA~SON & UNDERWOOD Page 2 M_~. Eldo Schmidt, Chairman June 6, 1984 adopted by the HRA, and therefore I don't know exactly what you have done, although as I understand it from talking wit~ Mark the HRA has in effect approved the plan in a preliminary way and wants it submitted to the other governmental agencies and the Planning Commission for review and comment. The plan is required to meet the requirements of both Chapter 462 and Chapter 273. The HRA should now submit its redevelopment plan and its method of financing and the written opinion of the Planning Connnission to the City Council. The City Council must then hold a public hearing giving not less than ten days notice nor more than 30 days notice by publication in the off'cia! newspaper. ~ne Authority and the City Council must find by resolution as follows: 1. That the land in the project area would not be made available for redevelopment without the financial aid being sought from the HRA and the City. 2. That the redevelopment plans for the redevelopment area in the City will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the needs of the City as a whole for the redevelopment of such area by private enterprise. 3. That the redevelopment plan must conform to the general plan for the redevelopment of the City as a whole. To comply with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 273.74, the HRA and the City Council must find that the redevelopment district complies with the statutory definition, and both the preliminary plan and the final plan appear to meet that determination. It is my suggestion that the proposed development program incorporate by reference and make a part of the redeveiooment plan the To~m Square Qualification Report of April, 1984, as amended. That is the reoort dated April !!, 1984, of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority "%o~ Square Tax Increment Financing Feasibility Analysis" As a oart of that feasibility analysis, information is contained concerning t. he structures in the area and a building evaluation. ~ _ ='/30~ requirements set forth to define Since we must ~eet the 70,~/?0~, ~ a redeveloomen: disnrict, tha~ reoor: should be incorporated because i~ m~kes those findings. The outline of the _e~ece~oomen~ ~rogra~ WURST, PEARSON, HAMILTON, LARSON & UNDERWOOD Page 3 ME. Eldo Schmidt, Chairman June 6, 1984 and the tax increment financing plan essentially follow the requirements of 273.74, Subd. 1. As a part of that plan, it appears that all the requirements of 273.74 also have been met, but my suggestion would be that in our final approval by the Council and by the HRA, we essentially incorporate all of the statutory language and then indicate that both bodies find those findings to be correct and complete. I do not believe we have to modify the plan, but merely that the resolution of approval should be drawn with 273.74, Subd. 1, 2 and 3 being taken into consideration. As to the development program and the financing plan, my com~ents are very sparse. I do think that the plan constantly refers to the City when in effect it should be referring to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. There should be no mis- understanding by either the City Council or the HP~ that the responsibilities for this plan and the implementation thereof rest with the H~. The City Council, other governmental agencies, and the public will have their input at the time of the public hearing before the City Council, but all of the things which are talked about in the plan~'and statutory requirements as to Row the project is constructed will be the responsibility of the HRA. The HRA is going to have to determine that the redeveloper is a proper entity, and this may mean the formation of a redevelopment corporation or other joint venture organization which has the responsibility for all payments under the project or letters of credit, performance bonds, and guarantees to assure the HRA and the residents of the City of Mound that the project is carried out consistent with the plan. This normally requires a redevelopment agreement which is long and extremely detailed, and I cannot stress enough the need to follow the statutes and to have all the i's dotted ,~and the t's crossed, and all of the agreements in an enforceable form. The HRA will have some very sensitive negotiations with property owners and to carry out the relocation of families who live in the ~District. I believe that the reoort makes it clear, but ! want to stress that at this point you are dealing essentialiv with estimates, and unless the HRA is willing ~c, commit the genera:_ proper~y taxes of the City o= l.~ound, there wi~ ._~ have to be some co- orcznaEion o~ costs based on projected cos~_s un;, ~ you nave determined the orice of the land and The relocation expenses. If any of the orooert~es~ _ ._ have to go into condemna:ion, the f:~a_~ WURST, PEARSON, H,~I~II.TON, LAR$ON & UNDERWOOD Page 4 Mr. Eldo Schmidt, Chairman June 6, 1984 numbers to be paid for the properties will be in doubt for a long period of time. The HRA Commissioners must realize that they have the responsibility for this project and that they have the authority to pledge the full faith and credit of the City to cover any bonds. This brings me to my last comment which is on Figure 12 in the report entitled "Tax Increment Financing Analysis". This indicates. that from the years 1990 through 1999, the project will have a deficit cash flow starting with $18,775 and increasing up to $58,525. If the plan is approved in this form, it would appear to me that the HRA and the City Council are contemplating ad valorem taxes to cover these deficiencies for that nine year period. I would think that the plan should be modified to change the maturities of the bonds and extend the project IF it is the desire of the HRA and the City Council to avoid a general tax. In conclusion, I think that the HRA, the City Council, and the administrator of this program should be in consultation with this office ~o assist in the preparation of resolutions fo~ the Council's consideration and other documents to make this a project approved for tax increment financing and in compliance with Chapter 462 of the state statutes. CAP: Ih cc: Mr. Jon Elam Mr. Mark Koegler Respectfully submitted, Curtis A. Pearson, Attorney for Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Mound and City of Mound REQUIRED PROCEEDINGS ISSUANCE OF TAX INCREMENT GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS MINNESOTA CITY '(HRA) Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 462.411 - 462.711 and 273.71 - 273.86 General Certificate as to organization, officers, etc. (City). County Auditor's Certificate as to Assessed Valuations. Organizational documents, HRA: a) b) c) Resolution of City Council under Sec. 462.425, Subd. 1, showing need for HRA. d) Copy of affidavit of publication of resolution establishing HRA, Sec. 462.425, Subd. 3. e) Certificate of filing of resolution establishing HRA with State Commission of Energy, Planning and Development (State Planning Agency). Certificate of Executive Secretary of HRA as to date of organization, names of present commissioners, officers, assets, debt and cop.y of by-laws. Certificate that appointment of each Commissioner · has been~filed ,with the-City Clerk and a certified copy has been transmitted to Commissioner of Energy, Planning and Development. Proceedings re Tax Increment Financing Plan. a) Resolution of HRA regarding Plan. b) Written comments of planning agency. c) Minutes of City Council showing receipt of HRA request and calling public hearing on Plan with letters to other taxing districts. d) Affidavit of publication of notice of public hearing on Plan. ~ e)~ Minutes showing approval of Plan b5~ City Council with findings required bv Sec. 273.74, ~ubd. 3. f) Certified copy of letter transmitting Plan to State Con~w..issioner of Energy, Planning and Development. g) HP~ request to County Auditor re certification of original assessed va%ue (M.S.A. 273.76) 10. 11. 12. 13. 14 15 16 17 18 19 Minutes showing adoption by HRA of resolution requestiqg City to issue General Obligation Bonds and approving tax increment agreement. Minutes showing adoption by City Council of resolution determining needs for financing, approxing tax increment agreement, permitting.issuance and sale of bonds. Affidavit of publication of notice of bond sale in local paper. Affidavit of publication of notice of bond sale in Commercial West. Certification of filing of tax increment agreement with County Auditor. Original or conformed copy of executed Tax Increment Agreement (between City and HRA pledging funds), County Auditor's Certificate as to assessed valuation within Tax Increment Financing District. Minutes showing adoption of resolution awarding sale of bonds and providing for payment, by tax levy or funding that establish collections of tax increments adequate for debt service. County Auditor3,s.ger,ti£icate as to entry on bond ~egister (and tax levy if required). Signature, no litigation and non-arbitrage certificate. Treasurer's Receipt. Certificate as to legal opinion (if printed on the bonds). Certificate as to official statement. Specimen Bond. Approving Opinion. Sprin9 1984 Prepared by Planning Assistance 1984 SESSION PRODUCES The recently concluded session saw the passage of some significant legislation affecting the ' MUCH LEGISLATION Twin Cities Region. Among the most significant were new solid waste provisions (H.F. 1577), AFFECTING REGIONAL aggregate resources legislation (S.F. 881), and the Metropolitan Transit Commission reorgan- ISSUES ization (H,F. 2317). Following is a summary of the major provisions of each. Solid Waste Provisions Designation of Resource Recovery £eci/ities-Procedures for designation of resource recovery facilities have been modified and recodified. Designation may not apply to recycled goods or to materials processed at another resource recovery facility in operation at the time the designation plan is approved, Also excluded are materials that will be processed at another resource recovery facility if that facility will be completed within 18 months. Later determination is to be made by the Metropolitan Council, Certificate of Need-Required for new landfill capacity throughout the state (whether new or exismg facility). Cou/~ty Fee Authority-Counties are authorized to impose a fee upon solid waste facility operators located within the county not to exceed 25 cents per cubic yard. Revenues may be used only for landfill abatement purposes, closure/postclosure care, response actions, mitigating/compensating for local risks, costs and adverse effect of solid waste facilities. Waste residue from energy and resource recovery facilities exempt from half the fee in certain cases. City, Town Fee-City, town fee of 15 cents per cubic yard upon solid waste facility operators located within the city or town for mitigating/compensating for local risks, costs and adverse effects of solid waste facilities, Waste residue from energy and resource recovery facilities exempt from half the fee in certain cases. Metropolitan LandfiliAbatementAct-Landfill operators within the Metropolitan Area shall .... - ......... 9ay fee of 50 cents13er:eubic yard or-equivalent. Waste residue from energy and resourct.' recovery exempt from half. Proceeds from fee to be used for a) metro landfill abatement · fund (50 percent); b) landfill contingency action fund (50 percent) abatement. Fund may be used for solid waste management planning assistance; resource recovery grants or loans by Metropolitan Council; market development grants or loans; administrative and technical assistance by Metropolitan Council. There is a partial rebate to cities for qualifying landfill abatement and resource recovery expenses. Contingency action fund may be used for water supply monitoring by Minnesota Health Department and PCA closure/postclosure care expenses, as well as response actions and closure/postclosure expenses. Aggregate Resources The act creates a 15-member advisory committee and specifies the interested parties to be represented. This Metropolitan Council-appointed committee is to be headed by the Council chair. The Council is to provide administrative services. The committee is to advise the legislature by December 1985 regarding the fo!lowing: 1. Whether information available on aggregates (gravel and crushed rock) is sufficient to allow local governments to protect aggregates? 2, To what extent the aggregates of the region should be protected? 3. What protection mechanism is to be used? Metropolitan Transit Commission The act establishes a new transit agency, the Regional Transit Board (RTB), effective July 1, 1984. The board is to consist of 14 members appointed by the Council from districts generally conforming to Council districts. It wilt serve as the regional transit planning agency. The MTC becomes a three-member body, its members appointed by the RT8, charged with the provision of transit service in the region. RTB implementation and financial plans must be approved by the Council. If you have questions about this or other legislation pertaining to the region, they can be directed to Gary Pagel, the Council's special assistant for in',ergovernmental affairs, at 291-6394. UPCOMING EVENTS REGIONAL SOLID WASTE PLANNING WELL UNDER WAY Metropolitan Counc;I 300 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 The following list of upcoming programs is offered for your information. Questions regarding these or other programs should be directed to the sponsoring organization (telephone numbers provided, or the Government Training Service at 222-7409). Computer Symposium for Local Government "Putting the Byte in Local Government" July 24-26, 1984 Thunderbird Motel Bloomington, Minnesota This three-day conference coordinated by the Government Training Service (GTS) covers a wide range of computer-related topics, from office automation to spread-sheet software. Participants will be given the opportunity for hands-on experiences during the conference, For additional information contact: Mary M. Sadek Government Training Service 202 Minnesota E~ldg, 46 E. 4th St. St. Paul, MN 55101 (6121 222-7409 League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference June 12-15. 1984 - Duluth LMC 612/227-5600 Planners Forum on Telecommunications Issues June 12, 1984 - Twin Cities Metropolitan Council (Jim Uttley) 612/291-6361 Among the most controversial issues the regi°n has faced in recent years are those of solid and hazardous waste disposal. The Solid Waste Management Act {Minn. Stat. 473.149 - 473.834}, passed in 1981, is a complex piece of legislation that sets out the process by which a regional solid waste management system is to be developed and implemented. A major component of the process is the preparation by the Metropolitan Council of a new regional solid waste management plan. The plan, when comDleted, will become a part of the Metroz)olitan Development Guide. The plan is being prepared by the Council's Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee and Council staff. Work on the plan c~mmenced in early 1983, but has been delayed by two factors: 1) the county planning process also mandated by the solid waste taw;and 2) the landfill siting process, which must be completed before the metropolitan management plan can De completed. Drafting a solid waste management chapter is a major undertaking; one that is unique in the Council's histor~ ir~everal,resoects. First is the nature of the committee workin9 orr' the plan. The advisory committee is cpm ;osed of 30 persons, most of whom are experts m one as 3act or another of solid waste management. This differs markedly from other Council advisory committees where specific professional credentials have been less significant in selecting members. The second unique aspect of this effort is that 20 persons representing communities w~tn potential solid waste landfill and sludge-ash sites have Peen included. Finally, this is the first guide chapter that will include a specific communications program. This section of the chapter will be aimed at increasing public awareness of solid waste issues, commitment to and involvement in solutions to solid waste issues. Shirlee Smith of the Council's Planning Assistance staff is working with a subcommittee of the advisory committee. The subcommittee is using"'creative problem-solving" techniques to develop its recommendations. Paul Smith, Environmental Planning, who is directing the chapter's development, anticipates a draft plan going out for public hearing in late summer or early fall of this yaar. Questions about the Council's solid waste management activities can be directed to Paul Smith at 291-6408 or Dan Krivit at 291-6546. Bulk Rate U.S. Postage PAID Mpls., Minn. · Permit No. 1610 7 ~ ~ I 0 E~q 0 E~'- ~ E C ~ ~ 0 r~OJi Z ~ U U 0 4~ ~ 0 0 0 0 r' U © "~