The URL can be used to link to this page

83-11-01 'OF MOtI D Mound, Minnesota MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1983 1. Approve Minutes of October 18, 1983, Regular Meeting Extend Temporary "On & Off Sale Beer License to November 15th Meeting for Thr~e Point Tavern. e PUBLIC HEARING - Delinquent Utility Bills Request for Installation of Street Lights at: 5013 Shoreline Blvd. 5932 Lynwood Blvd. CASE #83-258 - Schlee Builders (Russ Fierst), 3140 Harbor Lane North, Plymouth, MN. 55441 Legal Desc.: Lots 1-5, Block 1 Lot 4, Block 2 Lots 1 & 2, Block 3 Lot 3, Block 4 All in Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition RE: 8 Foot Front Yard Setback Variances CASE #83-257 - William & Muriel Stewart, 2960 Hazelwood Lane, Lot 14, Block 11, The Highlands RE: Lot Split/Subdivision CASE #83-299 - Jack Wang, 4408 Denbigh Road, Lot 89, -Phelps Island Park 1st Division RE: Variance to Recognize a Nonconfoming Lot to Expand the Existing Garage Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present Final Payment Request - Falls & Nyhusmoen - Fire Station - $4,654.00 10. Payment of Bills (To be handed out at meeting) 11. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Announcement of Annual Planning Institute B. Mediation Center Announcement C. Article on Plant Closings Pg. 2548-2557 Pg. 2557A Pg. 2558 Pg. 2559-2578 Pg. 2579-2581 Pg. 25U2-2593 Pg. 2593A-2593D Pg. 2594-2596 Pg. 2597-2599 Pg. 2600-2608 G. H. I. Ce M. N. O. P. Public Hearing Notice - Maple Plain Sewer Announcement of Meeting in Orono Mound Police Reserve Memo School District #277 Minutes Construction Cost in 1984 Public Meeting on Siting Transfer Stations and Solid Waste Processing (RDF) Facilities Letter from Roger Reed on Podany Property Letter from City of Wayzata Agenda & Minutes - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Twin' Cities Labor Market Information - October Metro Council Review - October 14, 1983 Letter & Check from Dowden Communications November Calendar Pg. 2609-2611 Pg. 2~12 Pg. 2613-2613A Pg. 2614-2618 Pg. 2619 Pg. 2620 Pg. 2621-2622 Pg. 2623-2624 Pg. 2625-2652 Pg. 2653-2660 Pg. 2661-2662 Pg. 2663 Pg. 2664 2 October REGUIJkR MEETING CTT~ GOUNCTL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341 Maywood Road in said City on October 18, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. Those present were: Mayor Robert Polston, Councilmembers Pinky Charon, Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen and Russ Peterson. Also present were: City Manager Jon Elam, City Attorney Curt Pearson, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Police Chief Bruce Wold, City Planner Mark Koegler, City Clerk Fran Clark and the following interested citizens: Larry Connolly, Melvin Larson, Gladys Larson, Mary Prociw, Yangie Waldroff, Ed Waldroff, Don Prince, Roger Rager, Rod MacCharles, Doug Thelen, Fritz Widmer, Robert Olson, Gary Paulsen, Ronald Burns, Dave Wagner. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Minutes from the October 4, 1983, Regular Meeting were~ presented for consideration. Councilmember Paulsen noted that on page 7, under "Burning of Leaves", he had voted nay. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the October 4, 1983, Regular Meeting as corrected. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. FUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO ZONING O.RDINANC~ m~ ~ ESTABLISH A PLANNED COMMERCIAL/II~USTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA The ~!ty Manager explmined that the preparation of this ordinance amendment was initiated because of the item that follows on the Agenda, a request from Mr.' Fritz Widmer to amend the 5-2 Zoning District to permit mini-storage facilities as a conditional use in the B2 District. The Staff prepared an ordinance setting up a Commercial/Industrial Planned Development Areas within all the B districts rather than ~mending the ordinance t~ include ministorage in the B-2 District because a PDA potentially permits tighter control of such uses compared to simply amending the B2 conditional uses. After discussing the ordinance draft, the Planning Cc~nmission decided to recon~nend that such an ordinance only be valid for the B2 zone and the uses should be restricted only to those now applicable to the B-2 zone with the addition of mini-storage facilities. The question now becomes should the Council amend the ordinance permitting planned commercial facilities (a variety of land uses within a variety of co~%mercial and industrial zones or amend the present 5-2 Zoning District adding mini-storage as a conditional use. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked for any comments for or against the proposed ordinance amendment for a PDA. Rod MacChartes, owner of property next to Widmers, stated that he is in favor of the mmendment to allow mini-storage. ?ne Mayor closed the public hearing. October 18, 1983 - Couneilmember Paulsen asked why mini-storage is only allowed in an industrial area. City Planner, Mark Koegler, stated that is a stgrage or warehouse type use and seems to be more in tune to industrial areas. Councilmember Peterson voiced concern about having metal po~e barn type buildings in this area. Couneilmember Jessen asked the purpose of a Planned Commercial Area (PCA). The City Planner stated, that the purpose is to provide a method by which parcels of land in the B-2 Zone,' General Business District having unusual building charac- teristics due to subsoil conditions, topographic conditions, elevation of water table, unique environmental considerations, or because of the parcel's unusual shape or location in relationship to lakes, trees or other natural resources requires more unique and controlled platting and development techniques to protect and promote the quality of life in the City. The Council discussed limiting at'PCA to only the B-2 District. Attorney pointed out that the Council has to either amend the .establishing a PCA or amend the ordinance to allow~ mini-storage District as a conditional use or neither. The City ordinance in a B-2 Couneilmember Peterson moved and Peterson seconded the following: ORDINANCE ~454 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 26.630.3 OF THE CITY CODE PROVIDING FOR MINILSTORAGE FACILITIES 'AS A CONDITIONAL USE Council discussion use; allowing or district. followed on whe{her mini-storage would be the highest not allowing metal buildings and consistency in this The vote was 3 in favor with Charon and'Paulsen' votihg nay. The ordinance amendment failed. .. ' PUBLIC HEARING: PRO.POSED AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING MAP & CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST FOR CASE #83-242 - WIDMER PID913-117'24 22 0016 No action could be taken on this item and the public hearing could not be held because there is nothing in the Ordinance to allow mini-storage in a B-2 Zoning District. The Council moved on to the next item. ~UBLIC H~ARING: ON THE ISSUANCE OF AN.."ON AND OFF SALE BEER LICENCES" - THREE POINTS TAVERN - ROGER & GAIL RAGER The City Manager explained that Mr. Roger Rager is again running the Three Points Tavern because of default on Contracts for Deed. He is now asking that all the Licenses be issued in his name. The following are the licenses he has applied for: "On & Off Sale Beer Licenses", Set-Up License, 2 Pool Table Licenses, 5 Games of Skill Licenses, 2 Juke Box Licenses, an Entertainment Permit, Restaurant License, and a Cigarette License. Mr. Rager explained that be has again taken over running the Three Points Tavern and is trying to get organize it again to be a paying venture. He explained 2 October 18, 1983 that he does not open until 3:00 p.M., and will basically run the place as he did in the p~$t. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked for any comments for or against the issuance of the licenses requested. Mr. & Mrs. Melvin Larson, 1664 Eagle Lane, stated that he objects 'to this beeausee of the noisy after hours parties in the parking lots; patrons of the tavern wandering around the neighborhood; the honking of horns late at night; the noise from the bar when the doors are open; weeds and trash in the parking lot. Mary Prowic, 1672 Eagle Lane, stated she would like to see some posts put in the parking lot so people can't drive onto her property and also a retaining wall. Ed Waldroff, 1677 Eagle Lane, stated that during the Summer he had threatene~ to sign a complaint because of a noisy after hours party and was told by a Police'Officer that it was a private party and he could do · nothing. The Police Chief responded and stated that the City of Mound does have a noisy party ordinance and the Police Officer was incorrect. Mr. Waldroff also stated that in the past when snow has been plowed from the parking lot at the taYern it has been pushed into his yard. He would like to have this stopped. Mr. Rager responded to the above .comPlaints, stating that he has hired two teenagers to come in this Thursday and Friday and pull all the weeds from the parking lot; that he has requested a bid from Widmer for the hauling out of snow in the winter; that he does not intend to use his Ccmmon's dock for h~s business and will not put signs on it indicating Parking for the ~vern. He stated that he is running the operation at this point on a limited mmount of cash and will need time to do some of the improvements that need to be made because the prior owners did not keep the place up. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Councilmember Charon asked Mr. Rager if he intended to do anything about the entrance to the parking lot from Eagle Lane. Mr. Rager stated that he would not be able to afford to pave it right now, but intended to but more gravel in and have it graded. The City Attorney stated that the Council could put conditions on the issuance of the licenses if they wished to cover some of the points brought out by the citizens present. P~ulsen moved a motion to issue the licenses requested. The motion died for lack of a second. The Mayor then asked the Police Chief, City Planner and City Manager to prepare a list of conditions that the license would be granted under, including the items brought up tonight, and bring it back to the Council for approval by the November 1, 1983, meeting. Until that time the Council will issue temporary licenses. October 18, 1983 Charon moved and Jessen seconded a motion to refer the items discussed to the Staff so they can draw-up conditions on which the licenses will be issued. Item to be on the November 1, 1983, Regular Meeting agenda. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Polston moved and Charon seconded a motion to authorize the issuance of 21 day temporary licenses to Roger Rager so the conditions can be worked out. Licenses will be put on the November 1, 1983, agenda for consideration. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ON STREET p~RKING VARIANCES- The City Manager reported that there are only 2 on street parking variances that are being recon~uended for approval. They are as follows: Gary Paulsen, 4738 Galway Road and~Peter Blank, 6382 Maple Road. The variance for Mr. Paulsen is because the property has rock walls the full length of it and the variance- request states that in 1984 he will excavate for a driveway. He just recently purchased the property. Mr. Blank's request is to park his car at the end of .Maple Lane because he has no place on this property%to make driveway. His vehicle is not in the way and no one lives beyond him. The Council told Mr. Paulsen that they would only issue this variance this year in order to allow him time next year to construct a driveway. : Peterson moved and Paulsen seeonde a motion to approve the On Street Parking Variances of Mr. Gary Paulsen, 4738 Galway Road and Mr. Peter Blank,6382 Maple Road for 1983-84~· with the condition that ~r. Paulsen have a driveway installed in 1984. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. .~ARK COMMISSION AP~OINT~NT The City Manager reported that the Park Cammission has recommended that Linda Panetta be appoinSed to the Park Commission for the remainder of Phyllis Jessen's term (December 31, 1986). ~ Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to appoint Linda Panetta to the Park Commission for a term to expire December 31, 1986. The vote was unanimously in favor. Charon moved and Peterson seconded a motion to authorize the issuance of a Bingo Permit to the Mound Fire Depart Auxiliary for November 15, 1983. The vOte was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE 983-256: ROBERT L. OLSON, 4424 DENBISH .ROAD, LOT 91, P~ELPS ISLAND PARK 1ST DIVISION -,,V, ARL~NCE TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NON-CONFORMING SETBACK AND LOT The City Manager explained that the Planning'Cammission has recommended denial of this request but that the Staff has recommended approval because the addition would make the home conforming in square footage. The Staff would recommend October 18, 1983 approval with conditions: the applicant grant the city a 15 to 20 foot easement for future road purposes and the expansion conform to the 6 foot setback. Mr. Olson agreed. Charon moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #83-191, RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE 'AN F/ISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACK AND NONCONFORMING LOT FOR LOT 91, PHELPS ISLAND PARK 1ST DIVISION - PID $19- 117-23 2~ 0026 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~83-255: ADRIAN YACKLEY, 5109 DRUMMOND ROAD, LOT~ 3 & 4, BLOCK 14, WHIPP4E - ~ FOOT RF~ YARD V~RIANCE The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has recommended denial of this request because it does not meet the rear yard setback and could be redesigned to conform to the Zoning Code. The Council discussed the variance request and agreed with the Planning Co~nission. Polston moved and Charon seconded a motion to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation and deny the variance request for Adrian Yackley, 5109 Drummond Road, Lots 3 & 4, Block 14, Whipple. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: CASE ~83-25~ - RONALD T. BURNS, 3245 DEXTER LANE, LOTS 13 & 14, BLOCK 20, DEVON - P!D ~25-117-2~ 11' 0111 - V~CATION OF NORTH 7 1/2 FEET OF'~UNDEVELOPEUWINDSOR '~oAD The C~ty Manager explained that there is a 30 foot right-Of-way for Windsor Road and the proposed vacation would take 7 1/2 feet off the north side and there would be 7 1/2 feet on the opposite side of the street for possible vacation leaving 15 feet for an access road through. This vacation would make the setbacks for the proposed garage on Lots t3 and"14 conforming. The Planning Co, w, ission has recommended approval of this vacation but only for the strete portion of the property not the utility portion. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked for any comments for or against the approval of this vacation. Mr. Donald Prince, 4917 Island View Drive, stated that he did not object as long as the proposed garage was not built on the vacated portion of Windsor Road. The Council assured him it would not. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Charon moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-192 RESOLUTION VACATING 7 1/2 FEET OF THE STREET PORTION OF WINDSOR ROAD, BUT RETAINING THE UTILITY EASEMENTS 5 October 18, 1983 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE t83-252: DOUGLAS THELEN, 3103 DEVON LANE, LOTS 1,2,3,4&7, BLOCK 3, ARDEN- 1'2.4 AND-16.35 FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE The City Manager explained that Mr. Thelen has applied for a building setback variance of 12.4 and 16.35 feet to the street fronts to allow for the removal of an existing portion of the home and to reconstruct at the same location, a two story 12 foot by 30.3 foot addition. The Planning Commission has recommended approval due to the ~opography and the unusual shape of the lot of record. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-193 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE FRONT YARD VARIANCES AS RE~UESTES FOR LOTS 1,2,3,4 AND 7, BLOCK 3, ARDEN {PI]) ~2~-117-24 ~4 0029) The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.' · CO~9~ENTB & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS ~PRESENT-~ The Mayor asked if there were any comments or suggestions from the citizens present. There were none. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW: HOUSING PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY KRAUS-ANDERSON Mr~ Dave Wagner, an architect with BWBR, was present to explain Kraus-Anderson's sketch plan for the Lost Lake site. Their preliminary market analysis indicates to them that ampty nester housing is needed. They have a sketch plan with 2 buildings of 5 or 6 stories each facing the open marsh. They would be some inside parking and outside parking (they wouldn't know the exact number until their market study is completed). They have been informed that 2 service station companies are looking at sites in this area and they.would like to see~ any service station at the end of the development. Docks would be nice but may not be necessary. ~heir soil reports are not completed and will have to be investigated but it may be important to open up some of the marsh area. Other questions not dealt with is the PCA's claim of possible hazardous wastes in Lost Lake. He assured the Council that they want to work with the City in the development of this. area. Mayor Polston asked how many units would be considered? Mr. Wagner stated from 114-120, but that is unsure at this point. The Mayor asked how much the project would be worth. Mr. Wagner stated approximately six m~_llion dollars and that they would be condominium or co-op type housing. Councilmember Paulsen asked the Planner,what kind of an impact this would have on the Downtown Business District. Mark Koegler stated that he felt it would have a good impact. Councilmember Paulsen stated that he thought Kraus-~derson should have the soil borings done before a market study is done in order to see if the prbperty can be built upon'. He suggested contacting Bud Stannard for the soil report he had done in the last few years. October 18, 1983 Councilmember Jessen voiced concerns for the wetlmnds and the docks if they were offered in the marketing of the units. Couneilmember Peterson asked how they decided on "empty nesters" as the prime people for this type of housing. Mr. Wagner stated that they felt it was a needed item and felt it would be attractive to that age group. The Council discussed setbacks, other amenities, the wetlands, etc. Peterson moved and Charon seconded a motion to concur with the Planning Commission recommendation to give conceptual approval of the sketch plan presented to the Planning Cc~mission and the City Council by Kraus- Anderson on the Lost Lake site, agreeing that multi-family is an appropriate use for the property and encouraging Kraus-Anderson to proceed with their study. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 'REFUND REQUEST: JON SCHERVEN - VACATION APPLICATION Peterson moved and Jessen seconded a motion to approve the refund request of Mr. Jon Scherven for the unused portion of his alley vacation filing fee The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING: RF . T.TOCATION OF CpBG FU. NDS The City Manager explained that the Pond Ice Arena would like to install a handicapped ramp and is requesting funds_from the 1983 CDBG Funds to pay for 50% of this ($1,250.00). A public hearing will have to be held to reallocate these funds for this project. Suggested date: November 15, 1983. Charon moved and Peterson seconded a motion to set November 15, 1983, for a publlc'hearing on the reallocation of $1,250.00 of 1983 CDBGFunds for the purpose of installing a handicapped ramp at the Pond Ice Arena. The vote was 'unanimously in favor. Motion Carried. RECONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEIT PROPERT7 The City Manager explained that there are several lots that should be reconveyed to the State so that they can be sold to adjoining property owners. They are: a. Lot 21, Block 12, Pembroke b. Lot 5 , Block 9, Woodland Point Jessen moved and Charon seconded the follcwing resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-19~ RESOLUTION RECONVEYING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES BACK TO' THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SAT.~ OF SAID TAX FORFIE T~NDS AND TO RETRICT THE'SM.F. TO UWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS - LOT 21, BLOCK 12, PEMBROKE & LOT 5, BLOCK 9, WOODLAND POINT. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. October 18, 1983 -ELECTRIC LOAD STUDY The City Manager reported that Triangle Engineering, Inc. ~ill do an electric load study on the City's water system as per the Council's discussion during the budget process. The cost would be $B,900 and would be paid out of. the Water Fund. Peterson moved and Charon seconded a motion to authorize the Manager .to sign a contract with Triangle Engineering, Inc. for the purpose of an electric load study of the City's w'ater system, at a cost of $3,900 to be paid from the Water Fund. The vote was ~ in favor with Couneilmember Paulsen absent from the vo~e. Motion carried. SET DATE FOR PUB.5.!.C HEARING:' AMENDING RESTAURANT CLASSIFICATIONS, APPLICA- ,, 'TION TO 5-1, 5-2, AND 5-3 ZONING DISTRICTS ~D pERMITTING RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE 5-3 ZONING DISTRICT~ .Charon moved and Peterson seconded a motion to set November 15, 1983, for a public hearing on the proposed zoning change amending restaurant classifica- tions, application to B-1, 5-2 and 5-3 Zoning Districts and permitting residen- tial uses within the B-3 Zoning District. The vote was 4 in favor with Council- member Paulsen absent from the vote. Motion carried. ~ ..LAGOON PARK: VACATION &_ ~LAND TRADE sITUATION The City Manager explained that this is a situation that Mr. Podany and the City have been trying to work out for some time. What basically would happen is a land exchange. The City would vacate some park land in exchange for a piece of Mr. Podany's property which would give the City access to Lagoon Park. The problem has been that the City cannot give clear title to the park property to Mr. Podany. Mr. Podany's attorney has now suggested that the City vacate the · piece Mr. Podany waQts and Mr. Podany will subdivide off the piece of his land that the City wants for access to Lagoon Park. Then Mr. Podany will do all the legal work, at his expense, required to have the park property put in his name. The Park Commission has approved the land exchange proposal twice {once in 1981 and once in 1983) and the City Council approved the concept in 1981. Peterson moved and Jessen seconded a motion giving direction to move ahead with the City's vacation procedure simultaneously with Mr. Podany's application for a subdivsion of his property for the land exchange. The vote was 4 in favor with Councilmember Paulsen voting nay. Motion carried. Peterson moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $76,632.18, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~PPROVAL OF CBD SNOW RSMOV~L BID The City Manager stated that bids have been received for the CBD snow removal 8 October 18, 1983 for the winter of 1983. Two bids were received and the lcu bi6 was from Illie$ & Sons. Polston moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-195 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 1983-84 CBD SNOW REMOVAL BID TO TT_T.~ & SONS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS Letter from A.M.M. regarding PCA & Lost Lake. Metro Council Review for September 29, 1983. Recommendations for Dealing with Adverse Impacts of Solid Waste Facilities. from the Metro Council. Copies of LMCD Ordinance Changes: 1. De-Icing Equipment. 2. Fees for Special Events. H. I. J. Public Services RedesignProject .(Contracting as an Approach to Management), LMCD - Changes in Special Density Permits. Westonka Chamber of Cc~merce "Chamber Waves" - October, 1983. American Legion Post #398 Gambling Report for Septamber, 1983. Hennepin County Transportation Porgram Bulletin - October, 1983. State Water Resources Board Announcement. Housing Rehabilitation Grant Program Report. Park Commission Minutes - September 8, 1983. Ex~mrrr~E SESSION Charon moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to go into Executive Session to discuss pending Iitigation. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Time 10:~0 P.M. Charon moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn at !1:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Fran Clark, City Clerk Jon Elam, City Manager BILLS ...... OCTOBER )8, 1983 A-1 Minnetonka Rental American Water Works Assn Blackowiak & Son Bury & Carlson Butch's Bar Sul~ply ' Ron Bostrom Bowman Distribution Jan Bertrand Bill Clark Standard Coast to Coast Coca Cola City Club Distributing Davies Water Equip Duane's 66 Service Day Distributing Dictaphone Corp East Side Beverage Eull's Mf~- G 1 enwood Ing 1 ewood Hach Co. Henn Co. Sheriff Heiman Fire Equip Ha'yden Murphy Equip · .Robert E. Johnson Island Park Skelly Tom Jacobs Kool Kube Ice Lowe 11 s LOGI S The Laker League of MN Cities Lyman Lumber Leer Bros. Inc. Marina Auto Parts ~.1 i nnega sco tim Mueller & Sons i.ti nn Comm 'Hpls. Oxygen .. I'!~va r re Hdwe I~.S.P. ::,/ Bell Telephone A.J. Ogle, Inc. Pepsi Cola/7 Up P.D.Q. Food Stores Pogreba Distributing ~o',al Crown Beverage ;~g.31 Window Clean R;ol One Acquisition 5~:':llite Industries ~']cl s Schernau :pring Park Car Wash ~,-~,~ Streicher Guns · ;' '., ling Electric Co. .'-~,-~3r t Simar :i :qler, inc. / 3.00 48.00 107.OO 112. O0 434.30 17.85 100.43 306.19 1,587.94 154.65 209.20 2,817.60 20.23 86.00 2,O87.91 430. OO 3,289.84 78.00 84.10 772.64 8.5.81 ~38. OO 936.30 10.78 8. OO 135.OO 386.40 18.75 1,516.28 21~.16 3,167.O0 88.32 85.O5 7OO. 10 155.57 3,729.89 28.75 38.68 277.36 5,507.72 96.40 1,884.17 238.50 140.54 4,363.20 140.55 10.75 120.26 48 00 9 .24 105 40 330 00 '134 74 467 5o Holly Bostrom 15b. OU Cromer Management 245.00 State Bank of Mound. 12.O0 Twin City Home Juice 48.00 Terry's Plumbing 620.50 Thurk Bros. Chev 196.86 Tri State Drilling 877.77 Thorpe DistEibuting 4,542.75 Thompson Lu~ber 32.76 James G. Thompson 998.75 Unitog 258.22 UARCO, Inc. 353.35 Water Products, Inc. 156.50 Bruce Wold 8.00 Xerox 1,O35.16 Air Comm 94.00 Robert Cheney 334.00 Robert Cheney 241.00 Patsy D'Avia 60.00 B. Dalton 11.95 John Farness 241.OO Griggs, Cooper 1,885.1'4 Johnson Bros. Liq 5,084.94 Robert Lauer 500.00 M.F.O.A.- 75.00 City of Mound 94.36 M.A.D. House 2.00 Metro Waste Control 2,103.75 Mound Fire Dept- : 2,509.50 Richard Meyer 500.00 Old Peoria Co. 507.68 Ed Phillips 1,106.O4 Radisson Arrowwood 78.00 Uniforms Unlimited 290.00 Chemlawn 1,664.OO Deerland Distributors 430.00 Fire Control Extinguisher 20.00 Gerry's Plumbi.ng 147'.50 Eugene Hickok 1,945.20 Tim Johnson ' 15.00 Inland Associates 191.66 Kromer Co. 4.40 Lake Mtka Conserv. Dist 1,998.50 Doris Lepsch 15.OO N.S.P. 3,759.47 Precisio~ Striping 321.00 R.K. Automotive 54.00 Tom Rockvam 132.OO Real One Acquisition 675.00 Title Insurance 236.50 Timber Products 82.00 Uniforms Unlimited 28.40 Westonka C~mmunity Services 204.76 Western Tree Service 345.00 Zacks Inc 138.82 94 94 TOTAL BILLS $76,632. 18 / ,.~.- Delinquent water and sewer 33 439 2431 61 33 439 4317 51 ~3 439 4843 01 33 439 4919 81 33 442 4452 41 33 463 4626 91 33 463 4739 O1 33 475 463O 52 33 478 2854 71 33 478 4701 81 33 484' 2920 41 33 484 3134 11 33 '484 5012 71 33 487 4873 61 33 5OO 4456 O1 33 5O6 3135 81 James Lassek Tingewood Inc. Mary 0 Hara Bruce Johnson Kaye Smith Dale Krueger ~Bberta Nelion Resident David Borrett David Nelson Paul Zereczek Mark'~ebster M. Zuckman Jerry Olsen Steven Gran Richard Baanruud 33 515 3118 51 James Otto 33 518 4660 91 Henry Truelsen 33 524 3162 51 Frank Mc Gill 33 530 3121"81 Steven Kokales 33 551 3076 01 Wm. Noor Robert Smestad 33 554 3065 71 Valerie Peterson. 33 563 2954 41 33 572 4918 81 Gerry ~ozni~k 33 575 4900 91 Peter Galvin 33 575 4901 71 Dan Neumann 33 587 3026 91 Faragher & Hipp 33 587 3062 41 Dean Larson 33 587 4951 71 Gary Schleif 33 596 4724 91 D. Christ[anson 33 599 4747 41 Garnet Juenke 33 605 3235 61 Fred Martin 33 620 4746 Ol Philip Hofner 33 620 4828 61 Janet Nelson 33 620 4921 91 Joe Andrews 33 623 5313 22 Mike Hilbelink 42 259 4801 91 Water Care $142.30 ~ 54.41 50.97 123.78 191.5o 40.80 34.10 ~ 64.62 ._ 64.42 50.60 8o.lo ~8.~8 99.20 75.7O 66.08 65.64 2431Wilshire Blvd. 4317 Wilshlre Blvd. 4843 Wilshire Blvd. 4919 Wilshire Blvd. 4452 Denblgh Rd. 4626 Bedford Rd. Paid $58.00 Balance Nov. 10 4630 Manchester Rd. 2854 Essex Ln. 4701 Essex Ln. 2920 Tuxedo Blvd:. 3136 Tuxedo Blvd. Paid 4873 Cumberland Rd. 4456. Radnor Rd. Signed contract 3118 Inverness Rd. 74.46 93.74 76.68 o~.~0- 122.80 82.08 96.84 64.68 284.84 68 .'50 266~ Paid 4901 Plymouth Rd. 3026 Brighton Blvd. 3062 Brighton Nlvd. Paid 4724 Hanover Rd. 4747 Aberdeen Rd. 3235 Dexter Ln. 4746 Island View Dr. 4828 Island View Dr. Paid 5313 Piper Rd. 4801 Bartlett Blvd. ~.. ~;I?~Z .2~ 93.96 4918 MOnmouth Made arrangements 3162 Drury tn. 3121 Donald Dr. Paid Paid 33 439 2431 61 33 439 4317 51 33 439 4843 O1 33 439 4919 81 33 442 4452 41 33 463 4626 91 33 463 4739 Ol 33 475 4630 52 33 478 2854 71 33 478 47Ol 81 33 484 2920 41 33 484 3134 11 33 484 5o12 71 33 487 4873 61 33 500 4456 Ol 33 506 3135 81 33 515 3118 51 33 518 4660 91 33 524 3162 51 33 530 3121 81 33 551 3076 Ol 33 554 3065 71 33 563 2954 41 33 572 4918 81 33 575 4900 91 33 575 4901 71 33 587 3026 91 33 587 3062 41 33 587 4951 71 33 596 4724 91 33 599 4747 41 33 605 3235 61 33 620 4746 01 33 620 4828 61 33 62O 4921 91 33 623 5313 22 42 259 4801 91 Delinquent water and sewer $142.30 54.41 5O.97 123.78 191.50 40.8O 92.10 64.62 64.42 5O.6O 80.10 113.82 98.98 99.20 75.70 88.62 66.08 51.62 68.18 65.64 90.30 79.32 63.24 93.96 95.73 74.46 93.74 76.68 64.50 122.80 82.O8 96.84 64.68 284.84 57.46 68.5O 266.68 October'27,1983 INTEROFFICE MEMO T FROM: SUBJECT: Chief Wold Officer Ewald Possible street light locations DATE October ADDRESS 5007 Shoreline Blvd. 5013 Shoreline Blvd. S. 5077 Shoreline Blvd. 5019 Shoreline Blvd. 5025 Shoreline Blvd. 5918 Lynwood Blvd. 5926.Lynwood Blvd. 5932 L~nwood Blvd. 5935 Lynwood Blvd. 5942 Lynwood Blvd. p~-p Lynwood Blvd. Lynwood Blvd. RESIDENTS Jeff Gray Chuck Hawkins Tillie Puffer Sandra Cleveland Joe and Linde Alexander Tony and Xathie Pulchinski Linda Pu!chinski (sister of Tony) MiChael and Linde Martinson Cal and Linda Drew Co~nie and Robert Blake Art and Farrell Andersen Robert and Maxine Christie Don Soder!und Gary and Terry Schroeder REASON They have trouble pulling out on to Shoreline - hard to see. Concerned about pedestrians in area. Some vandalism - broken basement windows.. Some trouble seeing driveway at night. Can't see driveway at night. No particular problems. Don't care if there is a light put in or not. Linda walks from the bus home and feels it is very dark.~ 'Feels if Lynwood was lit up better traffic would slow down. They walk at night -.poorly lit. They have had gas taken. Hard to find driveway. Small children Small child. Lost drive way re- flector and paper tubes. They feel that driving in and' out of driveway is very diffi- cult. Granddaughter, age 72, lives with them. Husband is gone in the evening. Too dark to walk. Concerned about pedestrians. They don't feel that a light is necessa_~%~ e~:cept maybe for older people. ?~o~ng to IJaple Plain in a few months. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota CASE NO. 83-258 · Planning-Commission Agenda of October 24, 1983: Boar. d of Appeals Case No. 83-258 Location: Woodcrest of Mound, 3rd Addn. Legal Desc.: Lots 1 - 5, Block 1; Lot 4, Block 2; Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lot 3, Block 4; all in Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition Request: l0 Foot Front Yard Setback Variance Zoning Dist~. R-! Applicant: Schlee Builders, Inc. Russ Fierst 3140 Harbor Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone: 559-2200 The applicant, Mf~ Fierst, has attached to my comments his explanation for the requested l'Ofoot variance for 9 lots as described. He has provided one set of up-to-date surveys of the lots described in his request with existing and proposed yard grades. He has provided (12) copies of the City approved grading plans for the subdivision,'the plat copies and a signed petition of neighbors' approval to his request. The developer had an approved grading plan with the City which was not adhered to before the property was forfeited back to the financial institutibn. Before for- feiture, Deerwood Drive was installed with utilities. The lots, 1 - 5, Block 1, were undercut and a portion leveled with some of the fill removed' & placed for road purposes and on the south side of the road, Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 and Lot 4, Block 2. In doing so, the developer left a steep hill to the south and filled -' the area to the north with tw° ridges, one at about the 30 foot setback line and on'e at the approximate boundary of the wetland. The foundation area of the pro- posed building site has not been determined to be suitable for placing a structure, as it possibly was not a controlled compaction of the filled foundation area. I would like the Planning Commission to note that Paragraph (2).does state that the .building contractor would like to minimize their soil corrections. Lot 3, Block 4, off of Setter Circle has a large drainage ditch. The ditch was dug as a temporary drainage way for the area until the permanent culvert and catch basins were installed.. Outlot A is drained north by storm sewer to Lake Langdon. The permanent system'is installed and functioning. The temporary drainageway can now be filled and graded. Comments: The main questions before the Commission are: Does the City want to have the building contractor adhere to the original grading plans? Or, does the City want to allow some grading modification, but not grant the variance? And/or, does the City want to modify the grading by granting the variances as requested? Of the lots remaining in the Woodcrest Additions, there are others with similar situations. Recommend: The Staff recommends denial of the request as it is not of good planning practice. However, I would also recommend a modification in the approved grading plan on file with the City for Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lot 4, Block 2; and.Lots 1 and 2, Block 3. The revised grading to be approved by the City Engineer with slope reten- sion plans for any slope greater than 1:3 ratio. Jan Bertrand REALIOR' TELEPHONE 559.-2200 October 5, 1983 City of Mound 5341Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 RE: Lot Variances - 20' set back Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, Woodcrest of Mound 3rd addition Lot 4, Block 2, Woodcrest of Mound 3rd addition LoYs 1 & 2, Block 3, Woodcrest of Mound 3rd addition Lot 3, Block 4, Woodcrest of Mound 3rd addition · Dear City of Mound: I am requesting lot variances on the above mentioned lots for the following reasons: Lots 1 - 5, Block 1 have a large, steep bank on the rear of the property. The land contours were changed from the proposed grading plan, which was approved on the final plat. 'Now, if a 26 x 42 home is placed on those lots, with the current 30' set back, the home is right at the bottom of the steep bank. This in our mind creates future drainage p'roblems. With a 20'set back from the street, we will be able to control that problem. Also, behind Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, is a ponding'area that needs some special attention in keeping'the water out of the future home's basements. By having the 20' set back from the street, we will be far enough from the pond to be able to control the natural drainage to'that pond. Also with the vari- ance, the future homeowner's will be able to have a small area that will be usabl'e. Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, and Lot 4, Block 2 are very steep in the rear yard. Wifh a normal 30' set back, a 26 x 42 home is very close to being in the park area. This is very wet and a lot of soil correction~will be needed. With the. Vari'- ances, we could keep the homes out of the wet areas and minimize out soil corrections. Lot 3, Block 4', has a large drainage ditch in the rear of the lot. When a 26 x 42 is put on the lot, with the normal set backs, the rear of the home is right on the edge of the'ditch and drainage pond. ' A 20' set back would allow us to be]O' from the ditch and ponding easement area. Also, it would help us to properly drain off the water run-off. So with the above mgntioned hardships, we feel that a %0' front set back is well warranted. Thank you. Sincerely, SCHLEE BUILDERS, INC. Eugene G~. Schlee, President Case ~.'83'2'58' Front Y~d"~{~a'ck Variance'-°f'lO feet for Yari66S'ilots ss follows: .Lots 1-5, Block 1; Lot 4, Block 2; Lots 1 & 2, Block 3; Lot 3; Block 4; all in Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition. Bud Schlee and Russ Fierst were .present. The applicant is requesting street fron't variances for 9 lots in the Woodcrest 3rd Addition due to drainage, soil and topography problems. Soil borings t been taken in two places and in some areas the topography drops 233 feet. The Building Inspector explained that the origina! grading plan for the · development was no~ adhered to -- what was proposed for the lots to the south of Deerwood was not to cut the hill so drastically or what they'have. The developer came in and cut hill leaving a steep hill to the south (topography drops approximately 23 feet) and then used that to level off for the road and took some of dirt and filled the side north of the road. On the north side of. road toward Outlo~ A, there are 2 ridges now; one is at about the edge of the wetlands vegetation and the other is at where the proposed setback line was. (Deerwood sites) Off of Setter Circle on Lot 3, Block 4, there is a drainage easement marked on the north portion of that to Westedge. A large ditch was dug as a tempo- rary drainage way to back part of lot; now i.a' permanent culvert and'catch bas~'~nstalled to .handle drainage from Outlot A north to Lake Langdon ~nd the temporary ditch is not required. Chairman questioned type of structures'being proposed.fo~ various lots. Fierst thought. Lot 1-5,'Block 1 on Deerwood would Probably be'tuckunders; one on Setter might'be split entry with attached garage, or a rambler;.the houses on north side of Deerwood would probably be split entry. Fierst stated that they are finding out there is a lot of problems with some of the lots; some have drainage problems, some soil problems, some fill. The original developer sold the good lots and the ones that are left have prob. lems. Discuss'[dm cont}nued. Byrnes'suggested that Planning Commission do these in three parts: I). Setter Circle lot, 2) Area south of Deerw0od and 3)'Area north of Deerwood 1) Setter Circle lot - discussed that temporary ditch could be filled; would Still drain'due to elevations. Michael questioned "if you fill Jn ditch, presuming drainage would be okay, you would not. need a variance, would you?" He feels that if we .could save trees and not'have to .give variance, be better off in the long run. Fierst stated trees would be lost anyway with driveway, etc. and variance to keep drainage away from the house would be better. Discussed. Byrnes moved and Jensen seconded a motion to deny a variance on Lot 3, Block 4 (Setter Circle lot). The vote was unanimously in favor of ~he denial. 3) Discussed the lots north of Deerwood with the two ridges i~ them (Lots 1 and 2, Block 3 and Lot 4, Block 2). Lots could have more fill - original proposal was to bring back of property to 941~'~V~ould take a lot more work and soil compaction. Byrnes asked if City Engineer has looked at lots to see about feasibility of filling. Discussed whether fill put in was in a controlled manner. The Building Inspector stated Engineer has been out; the soil borings that were done did not indicate any soil problems at all. Fierst stated that only one house has been built on Deerwood and they feel the whole block should get variances because there would be consistency of house setback lines'-have nice looking street. Lots drop off--whole block should.be pulled forward. Other lots on street were sold by them, but are in worse situation then t~ese lots variances are requested for.. 'Discussed Planning Commission Minutes October 24, 1983 - Page 3 that developer should have been required to have a bond to do grading job rig~t;.developek sold.choice lots and Bank got the problem lots back. Also, covenant was not filed and is unenforceable. Byrhes moved and Jensen seconded a motion to deny variances on Lots 1 and 2, Block'3 and Lot 4, Block 2, Woodcrest 3rd Addition. Discussed. Michael asked "argument for consistency or conformity in neigh- borhood as opposed to vacant land sitting there has no merit--if vote would be Co remain consistent with first one, where are we?" Chairman stated first lot off by itself. The vote on the motion was Byrnes, Jensen and Charon in favor of the denial; Michael and Weiland opposed to the denial. Motion carries 3 to 2. 2) 5 lots in Block .1 - the Building Inspector stated Lot 4 has a 23 foot fall; lots were overcut or undercut,' however you look. at it.. Charon feels there is more of a hardshi.p on these lots - others can be filled; can't do much with a steep slope. Discussed. Anything more than a 3:1 slope has 'to be sodded or seeded. Charon moved and Byrnes seconded a motion.to approve l0 foot variances for Lots~l, 2, 3, 4 and 5, ~lock I, Woodcrest 3rd Addition. The vote was unanimously in favor. Applicant requested that this be considered at the November 1st Council meeting. CITY OF HOUND ~PPLICATION TO 'PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Piease type the following information) ' Fee t~a i c~ ¢ .,.~. o ~ Date Filed /0-~-?",~""~' party Applicant '(if other than owner): ¢ Type:of Request: Day Phone No. Variance ( ) Conditi6na~ Us~ Permit ( ) AmenSment Zoning Interpretation & Aeview ( ] Sign Permit Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. : ( )*Other *If other, specify: " ~,Present'Zoning Distr.ict ~--,/ 8. 'Has ~n ap~iication .ev,r been made for zonin~rian'ce, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? If so, .list 'date(s). of list date(s) of application, action taken a'nd provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all'of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the eh. try in or upon the premises described in .this application by any authorized official of the City of Hound for the' purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required bY law---~~ /~ ~~~ Planning Commission Recommendation: t0-24-83 Date CoJnci 1 Action: Re§olutlon No.. Date Reques~ for Zoning Variance Procedure (2) C&se i~, D. Loca'tion of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate. North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of. the Zoning O£dinance. III..Request for a...Zonin~ Variance A. All.i~formation below, a site plan, as described in Part Il, and general application must be provided before a hearing.will be scheduled. B. Does.the present use of. the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes ~ No ( )' If !'no", specify each n~n-conforming use: Do .the existing structures comply, with all area height and bulk.regulations for the zone district'in'which i't'is.located? Yes (~) No ' ( ) .. If ~'no", specify each non-conforming use: De Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for anyofshe uses.permitted in that zoning.district? ( ) .Too narrow ()~x) Topography ~ Soil ( ) Too.~mall ' · .(~0" Drainage.· ( ) Sub-surface (~) Too shallow ( ) ShaPe ( ) Other: Specify: Fie W~s .the hardship described abOVe'created by the a~tion of anyone having property interests in the ~and altec the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No ~ If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by"any'othe~ m~n-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No~ If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for'which:you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petJtion? Yes ( ) No ~ If no, how n~ny othe~ies are similarly affected? What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimens~io/~ a~nd written~z~xpl_anatipn. Attach additional .B.,~s hee t s ,~e~s s~ry~'~ ~~ ~/~~~~L/ -// ope r('y ' Will granting of the variance be materiarly detrime ta~ t6 p in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? ~" .-. -~' -- q7z.- 7t7;~ ,- 9'3'1 975.3 O Denotes iron Monument n Denotes Wood Stake XO00.O Denotes Existing Elevation (000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Direction of Surfacb Drainage / Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation Proposed Garage Floor Elevation--- Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = Iherebyce~i~thatthisisatrueand correctrepresentationofa su~ey ofthe boundariesof: Lot !, Block 1, WOODCREST OF MO~D 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any. from or~ on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as s~t for a proposed building. As surveyed/.; e-z~-~ (e.,.e.,.~.,~=,~ ~,s~ Thomas S. Bergquist ///] t Land Surve',or Minn Rag No.77~/ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for ,4,I / ,j 0 Denotes Iron Monument · [3 Denotes Wood Stake XO00.0 DenOtes Existing Elevation (000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Direction of Surfac~ Drainage ./ Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation-- Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation---- ! hereby certify that this is a true and' correct representation of a surVey of the boundaries of: Lot 2, Block 1, WOODCREST OF MOUND 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, !,iinne sota. And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any. from 9r on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as/(,et for a prop~.sed b~lding. As surveyed bymethis llthdayof May 19, 79 McCOMBS KNUTSON ASSOCIATES Land Surve, IFILE NO. ,or, Minn. Reg. No.TM CERTIFICATE OF SuRvEY' for DICK .. 0 Denotes Iron Monumen~ ~ Denotes Wood Stake X~O.O Denotes Existing Elevation Propose~ Top of Foundation Elevation {000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation Proposed Garage Floor Elevation ~ Denotes Direction of Sudac6 Drainage Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation I hereby ce~i~ that this is a true and corre~ representation of a su~ey of the boundaries of: Lot 3, Block 1, WOODCREST OF MOUND 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County~ Minnesota. And of the location of a~l buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or the stakesas t for a prop ed b 'ding. A~ su ey d bymethis lithdayof May Land Su~eyor. Minn. Reg. No. 7725 , ~~ ':}':~ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY ~ ,,m for O Denotes Iron Monument .. o · . Denotes Wood Stake XO00.0 Denotes Existing Elevation {000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Direction of Surfac~ Drainage Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation-~- Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = I hereby certifl/that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 4, Block 1, WOODCREST OF MOUND 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as ;~"~t for a pro@osedjb~lding. As_ surveye~ ' ~ _x , // v, / /1 zand Su~e,,or, Minn. Reg. No]"7725 l,~'¢V, 7-/2-B~ 5J~ · II II ' I Z I II1 ~ ~j!~C(~McCOMBS-KNUTSON,~,~I,,~ ASSOCIATE~,~,~, ,~ t~s INC. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for D/CId J /H 1 TI-/ 0 ~notes Iron Monument ~ Denotes Wo~ Stake XO00.O DenOtes Existing Elevation Propos~'d Top of Foundation Elevation ~ '(O~.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation PropOsed Garage Floor Elevation ~ ~ ' Denotes Direction of Su~ac~ Drainage Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation ~ I hereby ce~i~ that this is a true and corre~ representation of a su~ey of the boundaries of: ~o~ 5, ~oc~ ~, WOO~C~S~ O~ MO~'3~ 3~ ~gD;~O~, ~e~e~ Coun~, . l~inne sota. ADd of ~he ~ocat~on of a~ bu~d~m~s. ~{ amy. ~he~eon, amd a}~ v}s~b~e encroachments. ~ any. ~om o~ om sa~d ~md. ~ s~so shows ~he ~oca~on of ~he s~skes as~e~ ~or a p~oD~ed building. As su~eyed/ by~e~h~s 15th day o~ May 19 79 . ~~{.~ ~i~~~~~ ~-~s~C~~h~ Thomas S~ Bergqui~ /~ ~z,95 sj~ ~/~r/~ ksDd Su~eyo[. ~nn. Re~. No. 7725 ssos, [s. DICK JM IT , Denotes tron Monument Denotes Wood Stake X000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation (000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation ~-: Proposed Garage Floor Elevation ~- <. Denotes Direction ,9.f Surfac~ Draiqage ,Proposed Lowest .Floor Elevation -- Lot 4, Block 2, WOODCREST OF MOUND 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, ~innesota. And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as/T~, et for a proposed building. As survej, ed by methis 16th day of May 19 79 . ~'~?~21~__~-~' /~, ,~¢-~/~-~d:~,,~-~-~ " ' ~~.~c~,~ Thomas S. ~er~qu~ 9-Z9-~5 7-12-E3 5J~ Land Su~eyor. Minn. Reg. No.'~7725 H CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for DI£H J M i TH ./ O Denotes Iron Monument o Denotes Wood Stake XO00.O Denotes Existing Elevation (000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation --~ Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 1, Block 3, WOODC~EST OF MOLK~D 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and 'all visible encroachments, if any. from or on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as set for a prop_osed building. As surveye,~, by me this l6th dayof May 19 79. ~9-~(~~.)~ Thomas S. Bergquist 7-12-~.~ SJ~ Land Surveyor, Minn. Reg. No. 7725 ~ M~cCOMBS KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for O Denotes Iron Monument n Denotes Wood Stake XO00.O Denotes Existing Elevation (OO0.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation ~( .. Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage Propose'd Top of Foundation Elevation-- · Proposed Garage F~oor Elevation----- ' Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 2, Block 3, WOODCREST OF MOUND 3RD ADDITION, I- Hennepin County Minnesota And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as s/~,t for a propos.,ed building. As su ,rye. yeti /~ ,~ by me this 16th day of May 19 79 . ~~__~.b~t/j.~ ~/' ~., . ~~, ~ z~-:.~-z~(~.~ ~ Thomas S. Ber~uist -/~ ( ~f~/r//~/~¢ . , . , , , Land Su~e,,or, Minn. Reg. No. 7725 ~~=~"~ _ i II I I I III I I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for D/CH 6A4/TH I t ! UT/&ITy 4 O Denote~ Iron Monument r~ Denotes Wood'Stake XO00.0 Denotes Existing Elevation (000.0} Denotes Proposed Elevation ~ Denotes Direction of Surfac~ Drainage proposed Top of Foundation Elevation-~- Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation-- Lot i hereby certify that this is a true and correct representatfon of a survey of the boundaries of: 3, Block 4, WOODCREST OF MOUI~D 3RD ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And of the location of all buildings, if any. thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any. from or on said land. It also shows the locaton of the stakes asset for a prop~osed building' As surve ed by me this 17th day of May 19 ~_7_9__. ~ 7/ , ~ ' Y Thomas S. Bergquist ~ ~- ' ~-' [andSu~e,,oL ~nn. Re~. No. 7725 ~ M fc r ..... D/CH 3M I ! C 0 0 C 0 / I $88°43'59"~ 332.0~ ' . . PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 83-258 RESOLUTION NO. 83- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOTS 1 - 5, BLOCK 1, WOODCREST OF MOUND 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the owner, Schlee Builders, Inc., of the property described as Lots 1 - 5, Block 1; Lot 4, Block 2; Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Let 3, ~I~ ~:; all in Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition PID Numbers 23-117-24 23 0087/0088/0089/ 0090/0091/0096/0097/0098, has appl.ied for a 10 foot building setback vari- ance from the required 30 foot street front in the R-1 Zoning District, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommends denial of the request for Lot 4, Block 2; Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lot 3, Block 4; all in Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition due to the fact that no hardship was established, and WHEREAS, the Planni.ng Commission does recommend granting the ]0 foot variance for Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition as the extreme top.ography of the rear portion of these described lots create a hazard to the structures, if placed too close to the slope. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the City CoUncil does hereby concur with the Planning Commission to approve a l0 foot front yard setback variance for Lots l, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition. CASE NO. 83-257 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of October 24, 1983: Boa rd of Appeals Case No. Location Legal Desc.~ Request: Zoning District: 83-257 2960 Hazelwood Lane Lot 14, Block 11, The Highlands Lot-Split, subdivision R-1 Applicant: William & Muriel Stewart 2960 Hazelwood Lane Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-3875 The applicant, Mr. & Mrs. Stewart, are requesting to subdivide a tax forfeit lot and split Lot 14 between them and their neighbor. The lot is 50 feet by 145 feet. It would be split equally between Mr. & Mrs. Gibson and Mr. & Mrs. Stewart. The parcels for each, after the division, will be 21,025 square feet and 18,125 square feet respectively. The City Zoning Code requires 10,OO0 square feet of lot area in the R-1 zoning district. Recommend: ! would recommend the division as requested'upon the condition that the equally divided Lot 14 be combined with their existing tax parcels, PID #23-I17-24 31 0026 a. nd 0028 as the division is consistent with the City Code. ~z 1. Case No. 83-257 Lot-Split Division Lot 14, Block 11, The Highlands' William & Muriel Stewart and Joe Gibson were present. The Building Inspector reviewed that the request is to split a tax forfeit lot (Lot 14) evenly between the two'nel, ghbors; 25 feet to each one.. The lot is 50 feet wide by 145 feet.deep. She is recommending the division upon the condition that the new parcels be combined.with the exist'lng t~x parcels of the two'.neigh- bors. The division ~is consistent with the City Code. The Chairman questioned how do we pick up sewer unit charges, etc. It was ex- plained that these are built into the purchase price of a tax forfeit parcel and that unit charges basically don't change unless the use of the property changed; i.e. another division would make a new building site. -if at a future date, the use changed; charges would be then levied. Jensen moved and Michael.seconded a motion to recommend approval and include the condition that when property is divided, it be combined with the adjoin- ing parcels as recommended by the Bullding Inspector. The vote was unanimous- I T~?i '!Ill/,~jj- APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND ' ~ Sec. 22.03-a U ~,~k_~. ~1 VILLAGE OI= MOUND OIIP( OF MOU D FEE S o o FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL 2.3-//7 ..zf 31 · Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: ZONING ?i,o ,2.3-117-J¥ ,.Y / o o .z ~v (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacen! streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each' new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FO.R.: New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet Reason: ' - - r .t ' · · ~4.s:gna~u"e~ Applicant's interest in the property: ~ TEL. NO. DATE This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE 14¢0 ¢~"~,) OUTLOT . 4 k 171o J 7 ~ I 11)2.% j EASi ' ,~ R1JSTt&WO01) ~D ..:05 iDLE:WOOD ~b CASE NO. 83-25~ CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of October 24, 1983: Case No. Location Legal Desc.: Boa rd of Appeals 83-259 4408 Denbigh Road Lot 89, Phelps Island Park 1st Division. Request: Variance to recognize a non-conforming lot to expand the existing garage R-2 Zoning District: ~pplicant Jack Wang 4408 Denblgh Road Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-7652 The applicant, Mr. Wang is requesting to construct a 10' x 22' carport to his existing detached garage on the west side. Pursuant to the Zoning Code, Section 23.403 requires frontage on an improved public right-of-way. Mr. Wang has a private driveway easement to provide access to his property. His 1978 survey indicates a lot width to Wilshlre Blvd. of 20 feet, instead of 40 feet required in the R-2 zoning district. His application, however, does not indicate the ownership of part of Lot 98, Phelps Island Park, 1st Division. The sewer is run on an easement at the north (lakeside) and the waterma~n is run to the south of the property. The owner has to locate underground utilities before placing the foundation. The abutting neighbors have been notified, Recommend: Staff recommends approving the variance request conditioned upon granting the city a 15 to 20 foot easement for future road purposes as per City Engineer's recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission recognizes the existing non-conforming lot with the existing structures conforming to cJty code. ';'~ ~--~n Bertrand e Case No, 83-259' Variance to recognize a non-conforming lot to expand the existing garage. - Lot 89, Phelps Island Park 1st Division Ja6k and Debbie Wang were present, The Building Inspector explained the request.- wants to put on a 10 foot by 22 foot carport addition on existing garage, The survey done in 19~8 was in- correct, She explained City is trying to Qbtain a road ~a~ement so that in the future we could design a public ~.ight-of-way through.there, The proposed carport will have'setbacks in conformity with the zoning Ordinance -- the only nonconformity is that there is no public right-of-way, Jensen questioned if he'enclosed'carport if it would make any difference, Building Inspector replied "not'if less than 840 square feet in.size", Byrnes moved and Jensen 'seconded a mot'ion to.recommend that request be approved with the'recommendation of t'he Staff for'obta ning a dedicated. road easement~ Staff looked at Mr, Wang's 'title and where our utilities are, Discussed'that Mr, Wang and also'Mr, 01son who got a variance before are in favor of having a public right-of-way through there, The vote on the motion was unanimously in favor', fl OCT 3 903 l TY OF D ~' Street Address 2. e CiTY OF MOUND ~3~A~ tion No. Fee' Pal d ~r~:S',l~ Is_+ b\d. PID No.. Day Phone No. APPLICATION TO PLANNING F., ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following information) 3perry /~///-//~) ~ .. ~r/~9,~.~ ~ ~/~ Legal Description of Property: Lot ~ Addition ~ !q% ~~ ~ 1 Applicant (if other than owner): Date Filed' Block Name' Day Phone No. Address -' 5. Type of Request: Variance ( ) Conditibnal Use Permit Zoning Interpretation & Review Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( )'Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other *If other, specify: Zoning District ~:~x- ~ Existing USe(s) of Property ~n~l~' ,~%~ ~~_- Nas an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or · other zoning procedure for this property? 6~'~. If So, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all ot~ the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Signature of Applicant ~ ~_~c~ Date Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Action: Resolution No. Date 4/82 ~Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure D. Loca'tion of: Signs, easements~..~n~rground utili..ti~s~ etc. E. Indicate, North compass direction .F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning O.rdinance. Ill. Request for a Zoning Variance A. All.i~formation below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing.will be scheduled. B. Does.the present use Of the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes (X) No ( )' If "no", specify each non-conforming use: Do .the existing.structures comply, with all area height and bulk.regulatlons for the zone district in'which i't'is located? Yes (Y~ No ' ( ) If ~'no", specify ~ach non-conforming use: D. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the.uses.permitted in that zoning~district? ( ) .Too oarrow (.) Topography ( ) Soil .. ( ) Too. small '. .( )' Drainage. (.) Sub-surface ( .) Too shallow ( ) ShaPe ('-/~. Other: Specify: E..Was-the'hardship described above 'created by the a6tion of anyone havi.ng property interests in the land after 'the Zoffing Ordinance Was adopted? Yes ( ) No (~ If yes, explain:. F. Was' the hardship created by'any'other man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (~ If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for'Which:you request a variance peculiar only to the property described'in this petition? Yes ( ) No (~ If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? C~ H..What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, i'f necessary.) Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the sam~ zgne, or to the enforcement of this ordinance?OX~,J~ ~ ~ ~ ' ,V,.,,,;,,.,', ~' ~t ~q. os ouu .'CA ' Z",,.~.ma3 uo~.:~.*,~7, -~zf~ ~,zad P"-:~"7~ s'aZ~-~ ~,4A P,~.~ A'~ u'~oq uT c:~'+dz:o3 '.;, t:r_,.'o£ ,{e~rnS $o 'l.'~Td' ~/~ Lot 89, Phelps Island Park, First Division. ALSO, that portion of a strip of land lying between the Northerly line of said Lot 89, Phelps Island Park, First Division and Black Lake and between the Westerly and Easterly lines of said Lot 89 extended Northerly to said Lake. ALSO, a strip of land 20 feet in width of Lot 98, Phelps Island Park~ First Division lying Westerly of and adjacent to a line drawn parallel with and 5 feet distant Westerly from the Easterly line of said Lot 98 and extending rom the Northerly boundary line of said Lot 98 Southerly to the Southerly oundary line thereof. ~zu~s~Lv~pa~...~ ..... of~7~e,s~or~Zpar~,L~ ~r~sLderat~n of t~pre~es,~rebp a~r~..~.~o pay pa~ ...... 2e~f t~r~p~, ~ .............. p~ace...~~E.e~ ........................................................................................................................ ~ a~ for ~ p~rc~e pr~ of s~ ~e~Ls~, t~ ~m o/.....O.R~..h~d~ad...f~t.e~...tho~an~...a~d ......... .~o.~LQQ...~.$.LL6.,.QQQ..O.O.) .......................................................................................................................................................... ,,_..~,.:__'~oZ~rs, $~1,803.32 cash ~n hand pa~d, ~he rece2pr of which ~s hereby acknowledged. $25,~96.68 by assum~nE and agreeing ~o pay ~ccord~ng ~o ~rs re~s ~ha~ certain f~rs~ mortgage now of ~ecord aga~ns~ sa~d proper~y ~n favor of Schumacher Horrgage Company, da~ed October 2Z, Z969, f~Zed October 23, ~969, Doc. No. 3800696. " $~7,000.00 ~he baZance thereof, payabZe as fo~Zows: $fi85.00 or more on or before the day of 3uZy, Z98~, and $~85.00 or ~o~e on or before ~he Zs~ day of each and every mon~ ~hereaf~er unC~ Hay ~, Z988, a~ which r~e ~he enrage unpaid balanc~ together ~h al~ accrued ~n~eresr, shaZZ be due and payabZe ~n fuZZ. Inreres~ shaZZ beg2n ~o accrue on ~ay.26,Z98Z ar the rare of Z~Z per a~um, computed ~on~hZy unpaid baiances. ~onrhly pa~encs shaZZ be appZ~ed f~rs~ ~o accrued ~n~eresr due f~ ~me ro ~me and ~he baZance ro the reduc~2on of pr~nc~paZ. A~ or any par~ .of ~he pr~nc~pa~ baZance may be prepa2d.'a~ any r~me w2rhour-- penalry. SeZ~er ~o pay aZZ spec~aZ assessments ZerOed a~ ~e of cIos~ng. ~ ~ ~ ~c {~11.~. ta ~v ~efare ~enaltv ~tt~che~ th~rela · p~rt, ....~.e..So[ t, ke first, pc~rt,, ar~ .................. Ja.ck.,l~,....Wang ....................................................................................................................... 0 U O~ ZO O0 ~, > ,-n ,.n XX I CASE NO. 83-M~. I " ,al I I ! ' UJ ENDORSEMENT " ISSUED BY PiOneer National'Title Insurance Company .. Attached to and forming a part of Policy of Title Insurance No. N 6,001 - 03616 Lot 89, Ph'elps Island Par~3 First Divlsion. ~9~xc~ z'~,r~___~_ :' .-'"~-'" Also, that portion of a strip of land lying ~,**~r~,o,~ ./" . between the' Northerly line of said Lot 89, - . ... T_~k, ,nd between the We. sterly and Easterly l~nes -'"~' '~-,- '~"r'c,, ~\ ' '' ' of said Lot ~9 extended Northerly to said Lake. ,\~-, ~. Also~ a strip of land-20 feet in width of Lot 9~, Phelps Island Par~, First Division lying ¥~est~rly '~!~/ of and adjacent to a line drawn parallel with and 5 fee.t distant Westerly from the E~sterly line of . ~ ~t~~ .' · enid Lot 98 and extendtug from the Northerly , ~.~ ~,_./...~....~ , boundary line of. said Lot 98 Southerly to the,. _~_.L.~__/~i~,,.,. Southerly boundary line thereof..- ----'" ..t,-"~'"'to:-_~ '~5-~. .. .. ,, : : · ! , . . . '. . ..~. ...e..~.o:...Rt' . · "The'sketch above lndieale$ correctly Ihe she nad dimens;onf'of prem]se'$ described according "which under the recording laws impart construclDe notice as to said land, bu! cannot be u,ed for determinirig property ' lines n¢¢,'sxary !or building fen¢~ or settling properly line di~pule$. :! The 'C~mp'any certifies that the buildings situated on the above described real cstat~ arc located on and within- lh¢ boundaries o{ said premises and lhat thc buildings Iocaled on thc ~djoining property do not encroach upon subject :: , :' prcmise, a. ' , '~ The total, liabili'ty of thi Company under said po!icy and any endorsements therein shall not e~cced, in tl~ .' aggregate, thc face amoun% of said policy ,*nd costs which Ibc Company is obligalcd under thc conditions and stipulations thereof to pa}'. ' This endorsement when counler~i§ned below by a Validating Signatory is made a part of said policy and is subject to thc schedules, conditions and stipulations therein, except as modified by thc provisions hereof. · : .. Nothing hcrcln contained shall b~ construed as extending or changing thc.eflccllve date of said policy, unless othcravL~ expressly grated. ' ' ~ ' · 1~ }Vitnez$ FffhereoI, Pioneer National Til}e ln~;t,rancc Company has caused ils corporalc name and seal to be lacreunto ~ffixcd by its duly authorized oll'lccrs as of the date shown herein, thc efi'cctivc d~tc of th}$ endorsement...: .. October 10. 1969 ESOLUTION NO, PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. 83-257 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE FINAL SUBDIVISION FOR LOT 14, BLOCK 11, THE HIGHLANDS, PID 23-117-24 31 0027 WHEREAS, the final subdivision of Lot 14, Block 11, The Highlands, PI-D # 23-117-24 31 0027, has been submitted in the manner required for subdivision of land under the City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 22.00 and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder, and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a waiver of the subdivision requirements con- tained in Section 22.00 of the City Code, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommends approval subjec.t to conditions, and WHEREAS, it is hereby determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property such that 'the strict application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land; that the waiver is neces- sary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: Ao That the request of William and Muriel Stewart and Joe and Joanne Gibson for the waiver from the provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code and request to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as PID 23-117-24 31 0027, Lot 14, Block 11, The Highlands, is hereby granted to permit division of the property in the following manner: North Parcel: South Parcel: Bo Co Upon the further condition that, when the two parcels are divided, such parcels be added to, and combined with the adjacent parcel of land. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this resolution to the above named owners and subdividers after com- pletion of requirements, for their use as required by M.S.A. 462.358. This final subdivision shall be filed and recorded within 180 days of the date of the adoption of this resolution in the Office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City. Proposed Resolution Case R[SOLUTION NO. §3- RESOLUTION TO A~PROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNI'ZE A NONCONFORMING SETBACK AND NONCONFORMING LOT FOR LOT 89, PHELPS ISLAND PARK ]ST DIVISION PID #19-117-23 24 0024 WHEREAS, Jack Wang, the owner of property described as Lot 89, Phelps Island Park First Division; also that portion of a strip of land lying between the northerly line of said Lot 89, Phelps Island Park, First Division and Black Lake and between the westerly and easterly lines of said Lot 89 extended northerly to said Lake. Also, a strip of land 20 feet in width of Lot 98, Phelps Island Park, First Division lying westerly of and adjacent to a line drawn parallel with and 5 feet distant westerly from the Easterly line of said Lot 98 and extending from the Northerly boundary of said Lot 98 Southerly to the Southerly boundary line thereof( NOTE: the property description is in question?) PID#19-117-23 24 0024) has applied for a variance to allow for the construction of a 10 X 22 foot carport addition to an existing detached g~rage with a setback to the west lot line of 5 foot; and WHEREAS, the City. Code requires two 6 foot s~d.e yards in the R-2 Zoning District and a lot requires frontage on an improved public right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota does hereby approve the one (1) foot variance as requested upon the condition that Mr. Jack Wang and all fee owners grant an easement for road purposes over the above described property, PID #19-117-23 24 0024, known as 4408 Denbigh Road, such easement to be described by the City Engineer. 0 'r U 7' U n "r' Z .~ r~ ~ ~',,. U ~0 O~ O0 U X ~ n r~I- n U n b- uJ >.- I.-- Il.. ~}... ~r'~ F-"~ u. lU~ 1.9 I'"' ~ OF-- GRADUATE MONTANA STATE UN]VERSIfY 1971 B. ARCH. -~CT )F MONTANA REG. 799 ARCHITECT STATE OF MINNESOTA LIC. 0! ]926 NCARB CERTIFICATE NO. 16422 BUILDING OFFICIAL STATE OF MINNESOTA CERT. 0572 BUILDING INSPECTOR Ih~ERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS CERT. 3534 MEMBER NORTH STAR CHAPTER ICBO MEMBER AMERICAN SOCIETY PLANNING OFFICIALS Alan P. Olson ARC', n T CT 5724 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD, MOUND, MIHNESOTA 55364 October 3, 1983 Mr. Sid Nyhusmoen Falls and Nyhusmoen Construction, Inc. 8700 West 36th Street St. Louis Park, Mn. 55426 612--472-4369 Re: Mound Fire Station Addition - Punch List Dear Sid, As I have already said to you and Don Falls, I do want to express my thank-yous and general satisfaction for the job you have done on this project. We especially appreciate the care and concern for quality shown by your foreman, Don Nasman. I've enjoyed working with Don and with yourself, and I know the Fire Department appreciates your efforts also. This will be my last contact with you on this project as I am leaving town this week. Any additional followup to this punch list, and your final pay requst should be directed to Mr. John Cameron, City Engineer, at McCombs-Knutson Assoc., or directly to Mound City Manager Jon Elam. Following are the items I've noted which need your attention in order to complete the project: (see attached page) Best of luck with all your future projects. f FA~lan P. Olson, Architect .CC: John Cameron, McCombs-Knutson Assoc. 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. Plymouth, Mn. 55441 Jon Elam, City Manager, City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Mn. 55364 Robert Cheney, Chief, Mound Vol. Fire Dept. GRADUATE MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1971 B. ARCH. ARCHITECT ' STATE OF MONTANA REG. 799 ARCHITECT STATE OF MINNESOTA LIC. 011926 NCARB CERTIFICATE NO. 16422 BUILDING OFF~CIAL STATE OF MINNESOTA CERT. 0572 BUILDING INSPECTOR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS CERT. 3534 MEMBER NORTH STAR CHAPTER ICBO MEMBER AMERICAN SI~CIETY PLANNING OFFICIALS Alan P. Olson ARCPIITECT 5724 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD, MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 612--472-43c October 3, 1983 MOUND FIRE STATION SECOND ADDITION PUNCH LIST' General Construction Hardware: turn button lockset in door ~2 (second floor exit) is not as specified Yale 8309A. Specified lockset has a full-size knob on inside (blank outside) to meet State Code exit requirements. Please correct. (note also key doesn't work latch as is) 2. Door stops (which are left in station radio room): a)double door ~1: mount stops on doors at point of contact with corner of block wall. b)second floor door ~4: mount stop on apron of existing window sill to contact door knob. (it works to to it this way) 3. Glazing: install wire glass in doors ~3 and 4. 4. Finish: a)Spraytext:ume=ceiling of room 201 (finish schedule sht.2 and spec. page 55) b)stain and varnish new wood window and door trim on second floor, and paint HM door frames for doors ~2,3 and34 (color dark brown on HM) (finish schedule sbt.2 and spec. page 59) Mechanical 5. Install missing cleanout cover, plate in rm. 101 on floor near north wall. Electrical 6. Label three new breakers in main panel box. 7. ReplaCe one ballast in lights, room 201. 8. Check and replace if necessiary the photocell for 2 exterior lights (fixtures "B") which were turning on and off erratically last week. ' END 6 I I 0 0 I I © 8 8 8 Z "4 Z 0000000000000000 000o00ooo0000000 ~000~000~0~o0~ ~~0~o00~0~o~ c~O0 ~ oo o~ooo~o~o0~ ~~ o~o o o~0~0~ ~o~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 0 W .~,m rO 4.~ October 18, 1983 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-4224 Mr. Jan Elam, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: 1983 Water System Improvements Booster Pump Station Dear Jan: Enclosed herewith please find two (2) copies of Pay Estimate No. 2 as submitted by A & K Construction, Inc. for work performed on the above referenced project. This estimate has been checked, appears to be in order, and is being forwarded to you for your approval and subsequent payment by the City of Mound. Sincerely, EUGE.,~IE A' HlCKOK AND ASSOCIATES George W. Bayer, IZ~-~q~. bt cc: John Aderman, A & K Construction, Inc. STATUS OF CONTRACT Original Contract Amount $89.990,00 -::. Extras approved to date '::..' 'Credits "approved to date .... :.-.';Net amount of Contract this da're*' ' !: ~i.~:.)":'.!: ':-' ",'.i;:~,'i~i: - : ":" :' ' 'Certificate of the Contractor or his duly Authorized Represent~tlve ~.'J ::Td th~'be~[ '~f .m~' kno~'iedg~ and belief,:I'certify that all items, uniu, q,~tltle, of work materi~l flaown. ' . .. :;"'o~the face of Sheet~ No. . I and 2 of this Periodical Estimate are correct; that all work h~ been : .::':..~.'."'6~ec~ana materials Supplied in full accord'ante with the term, and condition or the corr~pondlng comtructlon eon- :.:'ULact doct~ment~ betw6en City of Mohnd, Minnesota ~ (Owner) ~:':'.~nd,~.i~''& K"Oonstrucl;ion, IncorpOrated , dat~ckJuly , 1983, and all authorl:~l ': ' :7' chani~ea .thereto; that the following i~ a 'true 'and correct statement Of the contract aCcount up to, and including, the la~t- ',:'i':":(e'). Amount, due this estimate ................ ' Alapoved a~ to quantities ar,d estimate due: Superintendent of Construction Architect Supervising Engineer O O 0 O MEDIATION CENTER 300 Commercial Building 256 First Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55401-1626 Telephone: (612) 341-2828 October 19, 1983 Mayor Robert Polston City of Mound 5341Maywood Roa'd Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mayor Polston: I am writing to acquaint you with the Community Mediation Center and to invite greater citizen involvement in our program. It has been almost a year since mediation became available as an alternative to court for juveniles committing minor offenses in your community. Since that time, seventy cases have been successfully mediated with settlements involving appologies, behavior change and restitution. Follow-up, which is now'complete on the first fifty cases, shows an extraordinarily high level of compliance with mediated agreements. The enclosed brochure describes the program in greater detail. The program was established on the premise that juvenile crime is essentially a community problem. Children do not go far from home to get into trouble. Since those who live and work in the community are the most concerned abouth the problem, we designed the program to promote maximum community involvement. Trained community members serve as mediators and Advisory Board members. Recently the Advisory Board completed its program plan for the coming year. According to that plan, the Community Mediation Center will expand its services to include mediation of a wide range of neighborhood disputes--noisy neighbors, barking dogs, harrassment-- beginning early next year. This expansion plan includes broadening representation on the Advisory Board for increased community participation. As mayor of Mound, we would like to invite you to appoint a Mound resident to the Advisory Board of the Community Mediation Center. The Advisory Board meets monthly and makes planning and development decisions for the program. I would appreciate an opportunity to discuss the program and your appointment to the Advisory Board. Please call me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Joline Gitis, Administrator Community Programs Enclosure U CITY Of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 14, 1983 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Enclosed is an article regarding plant closing strategies which I think is one of the best I've read. After reading it, the strategy that Tonka is following comes clear and it really makes me angry. It's a strategy that put Tonka first, before the community, before its workers and for the short term before its stockholders. The whole story needs to be recorded someday. JE:fc enc. 'Speci ] Report William L. Bate, Jn Canada's good example with' displaced workers Experience shows that joint labor and management. ommittees prevent trauma when plants shut down. In numbers of towns across ~he United States displaced workers are standing in }ob lines, we]fare lines, amd unemployment insurance lin~s. Because many oft. hem received no warning of their plants' .closing down, they and the tow'ns they five in are unprepored for the loss of employ- ment. The emotional and e, conomic shock these workers.and towns suffer is great. Up north in Canada, the 16t of the displaced workeris much better. Bezause bylaw a company has to give advanc~ notice when it closes a plant, 'Canada's Manpower Consultative Ser- vic~ has time to put a remedial plan in motion. In an advisory capacity, the service he]ps the company, union, and workers devise and operate a ioint effort to place workers in other jobs before the gates close. When n~cessary, the sen,ice helps workers move to w,bere iobs are, retrains them, offers them fob search assistance, and sup- plies major benefits such as health insurance during the transition period. In this article, an authorfty on plato closings and labor-manage. ment committees describes the Cana- ' dian experience with plant closings, looks at how Western European coun- tries handle the snm'~ kind o~ difficulty, a.~d compares both ~5r8 what happens in the United Stat~. Americans. do not come off well. The article endz with a description of the eight fe.~ tares the t any comprehensive plan to help wor]~ers at a closing plant should include. ~r. Bate is q quafi~y-of- work-life adviser for. ~e Department of L~bor's Cooperative Labor- Management Program. He got first. hand exposure to plan t closing problems when he worked on indus- trial development for Toledo, Ohio in the mid.1950s. He served as s~retnry . of la bet and industry for Pennsylvania from 1957 to 19~1 and as area redevel- opment administrator for President Kennedy from 19~I to 19~5. As s~re- tory of the Commerce-Labor Adjust- ment Action Committee in the Carter administration, he was the govern- ment member of a labor-management- government team that v~sited most of the plants closed by U.S. Steel in I979 to help make sure workers r~ceived the adjustment assistance due them under law and coll~ctive bargaining. This is Mr. Barr's second article for HBR, the first being "Labor. Management Coop- eration Today" (lanuary-F~bruary 1978), coauthored wSth Edgar Weinberg. In the spring of 1982, wh~,. Outboard Marine closed its Galesl;u~' laWnmower plant, 800 workers lost · their iobs, and this west central lllinois community of $5,000 suffered a disas- · ter. The iobtess rate went from 14% to 17%. Other s~gns of a town ~n d~s~-es~- a decrease in population and a sharp increase in personal bankruptcy, divorce, and child and spouse abu:e- are still evident in Galesburg. - A few months later, Gene,':l Tire closed Akron's las; tire plant. T'ne former tire-making center now has .. 35,000 jobless workers. Bob Smit.~ who had been a fire builder in the Seiberling plant outside Akaon before it closed two years ago, told a N. ew York Times reporter o~ some of the side effects o~ plant closings on people in ~ his hometown: "I'd say 80% of the I worked with still aren't ~4ork- guys ing. Some of them went south but ' came back. Some of them are getting trained for iobs that aren't there, like jobs for' auto mechanics. Some got divorced and just left:: Some even commi teed suicide. Last year, one' young friend of Smith's shot his wife and then, amid the litter of unpaid bills, himself. Once laid c~ff when a plant closes, workers have a hard rime'find-. ing jobs. A Cornell University study of Mahwah, New Jersey Ford workers found that 18 months after that facror-f closed, S~% had still not found work.! A Wall Street lournal reporter wrote from Seattle rahat Boeing's reduction of the work forc.e by 8,000 workers since 1980 land its threatened ~eduction by 8,000.to 10,000 more) has punished the town severely; "We're talking to many more people who are depressed either because they've been laid off or because they're anxious for their jobs;' said Mrs. Lyn Schroeder of a telephone crisis line for counseling and referral. Calls are up 50% for alcoholism, drug abuse, marital stress, and threatened suicide. "We had six suicides in progress on New Year's Eve," she reported. At the same time, govern- ment cutbacks have lorced her to reduce her paid staff from 25 to 16. Rocktord, Illinois has the nation's heaviest unemployment rate- 19.1%. Public aid administrator Scherri Note: All Joou'~ote r~JmeBccs otc · .be cr)d el the er6cJe. H~vard Business Review )u)y-^ugust 1983 . . 7 Hall told the Washin~on Post about the particularly devastating effect on middle-aged men who had pro~pered ~'Ol~g ~ Iactofies~o~t homes -~d ~s, ~d then fo~d ~emselves )obless ~d ~able to find work: '~e're hzving repeated ~ses of men-women too, but especi ally m eh- braking do~ ~ ~e ~ke center~ c~g or sw~ ~cause ~ey have to come to o~ o~ce. ~er~ is more wile abuse ~d c~]d abuse, more alcoholism.~d severe depression, ~hich is ~ecting ~e children'; ~ey ~ Plant clos~gs ]~ve a wide swa~ of comm~ty, famil% ~d in~- x~du~ ~sasters ~ the~ w~e. Dn M. Ha~ey Brewer of Johns Hop~ns Uni- verse, reselling before ~n~ess~s Jolt ~onomic Committee ~ 1976, po~ted out that [or ev&~ one percent- age po~t rise in unemp]o~ent, 4.3% more men ~d ~.3% more women enter men~l hospi~ls; ~.1% more peo- ple co--it suicide~ S.YTo more are murdered; 4% more w~d up ~ state p~ons; and over a s~-ye~ pe~tod, 1.9% more people die from h~t d~s- ~se, ci~hosis of ~e Hver, aqd o~er s~ss-related ailments. The 1970 reces- sion, which ~used a 1.4% rise in job- lessness, ~n be l~ked to 51,570 d~s between 1970 and 1975. S~ce ~e present recession is more severe, its results may well be much worse. lJ~on~atel~ C~esbur~ Roc~ord, A~on, Mahwah, and S~ttle are not i~olated cases. Canada provides a model Despite the high degree of suffering that plant closings cause, in almost all major layoffs in th/s country employees are 1.~rgely on their own wken it comes to finding new jobs.' This is not the case across our northern border. In Canada, companies, unions, and\mrkers facing factory closings un c~ll the Manpower Consultative Ser- vice [MCSL part of Employment and Immigration Cznada, for help. The ser- vice works ver, e simpl); effectively, '~'nd The Disston stor): In July !979, Disston Canada decided to close its Aaron, Ontario plant and consoli- date .manutncruring at its Montreal :itc. Thc 110 hour])' ~nd 20 salaried employees in ^cron were going to lose their jobs. At the request of the company and Local 8603 of the gteelworkers 13nlbn, MCg hack, within weeks of the decision to close, helped bo~,sides estabBsh ~d ~nd their M~power Adjustment Core, tree. ~e co~ittee's m~ssion w~s to ~l workers reques6ng assisunce find new ~obs b~ore the pl~t gates closed ~ November-some fo~ monks later. Of the 130 employes, 101 souse by November, 90 had lo~d other suit- ~ble positions. The production ~d person- nel managers represented ~e company on ~e jolt labor-m~agement com- mittee, ~d secreta~-treasurer ~oke for u~on. Sala~ed non,ion employe~ chose their own 'representative. MCS officer acted ~ adviser, while the committee itseH, ~ter reviewing cre- dentials, selected ~ ou~ide ~rd par~- Jack Hemgs- as chaiman. ~e company and ~e provincial ~e federal gove~ents shared the ~m~ttee's ~pe~es for workers' time at its ~e mee~gs, for disburse- ments for travel and o~ce supplies, ~d for rem~eration of ~e chaiman. ~ lete November 1979, just when the Man,wet Adjustment Committee was w~ng do~, a Uoup from ~e U.S. Dep~tment of ~r, U.S. Department ol Commerce, and the Steelworkers Union cgncemed about plant clos~gs spent two days obse~ing ~e Disston pl~r and other ~a~ ~ses firsthand. {The Iron and St6e] ~stimte was ~ted but could not attend.) I t~ked wi~ Enar Nilsson, Disston's pr~uction m~ager, with Bob Lauzon, the parent ~mp~y's per- so, el m~ager, M~ Steelworkers officers Ken Swan ~d Ge~ As~ey, ~d wi~ Earl G~m~ of MCi Both m~agement and lair members explained to me how ~e committee went zbout its work. First, they si~ed a smdard a~eement set- t~g ~e parameters of ~e committee ~d spelling out its ~ding. Next, they held ~ org~izing meeting and m~de one-page s6~ey of the skills, hobbies, and willin~ess to move o{ each worker electing to p~rticipa~e. ~e compang the union, the third-party chairm~n, ~nd the provin- cial ~ob service then were ~bom de,er- mining demand tot their workers. The company used. its networks among the loom business community, its suppli. ers, and its customers. The union con- tributed its knowledge of what shops were hiring in the inc~tustr): "/"be job ser- vice had its job orders and area labor market information to draw on. The chairman had knowledge ot and con- tacts with other employers. Over theZ0 years of experi- ence they've had with this approach, the Canadians have found that com- bined efforts like thi~, dSrectly involv- ing the company and the union, who know these workers best, prove far more productive in uncovering jobs than do the impersonal and orca- worked iob service offices." Disston Canada gave work- ~rs paid time off to. go on iob intervie.ws. ' and to talk to interested employers who made visits to see workers on the job. The company also made sum that employees who accepted job offers before theb separation did not lose their severance pay. In his research into the e~fects on both workers and man- agers of a Pit. tsburgh Plate Glass paint plant closing in Detroit back in 1963, E~. Sidney Cobb discovered the impor- ' fence of this last point. Anyone who wants to understand viscerally what a plant shutdown means to the people affected and to learn mote about Cobb's work should teed Alfred S]ote's Termination: The Closing at Baker" P]ant. Cobb found that making sever- anc'e pay conditional on a worker's remaining until a plant closes deters initiative to ~eek a iob be{ot.e the axe falls. The best jobs generally go to those who get into the iob market first?. The committee chairman's iob at the Disston closing was to pre- side at meetings and see that assign- ments were made and carried out, to · engage intensively in job development- and encouzage other members to do so as well, and to keep records of the peo- ple placed. Jack Hemmings wound down the committee when it com- pleted its iob and made a final report specifying what had happened to every laid-off worker. Such detailed reporting offers a refreshing contrast to what happens in the United States. As a gen- era] rule here, no one knows what has happened to the displaced people-not the compan3; not the union, not the employment service, not anyone. Nor. does anyone appear to ca~e enough to find out. In 1980, plant manager C.J. Stone at U.S. SteePs Torrance, Cal~or- nia site made many'efforts to outplace steelworkers when that mill closed, leaving 600 iobless. But management had no idea how eHective its eHorts were. As on~ top manager explained, 'qYe must assume they've gotten when they stop coming to the person- nel office to sign up for supplemental unemplo)unen t benefits:' In Canada, workers can also receive retraining and 50%' of their moving expenses, which apply even to iobs in the same company. The MCS representative comaects workers whose skill~ do not match iob market demands with re~raLrdng programs that the provincial govern~.ent offers. The Canadian' emphasis is on h'elping workers f'md new }obs as expeditiously as possible, not on subsi- dizing extended unemployment. On this side of the border, we depend main]), on unemployment insurance and supplemental unemployment ben- efits. Essential as they are for Lncome maintenance, these programs are sim- ply not designed or adequately funded to cope with the needs of workers and their families hit by plant closings and permanent layoffs. They were meant to tide over workers planning to return to exis:in§iobs after temporary layoffs. · Two oth:r points struck me when o]:serving the Disston experi- ence. First, the advance notice of sev- elal months that provincial law r=.quires gives the commi~te, e.time to implement an effective outplacement program. Second, the MCS program provides a prompt, responsive, uncom- plicated, ~nd voluntary format that pools everyone's, efforts in this direc- tlon and ensures that the limited time available is used well Disston's experience is not. an isolated case. A.L. Cobb, who, with Allan Jacques, oversees the MCS pro- ~'-.m for Employrnent and Immigra- tion Can-~da, spoke in January 1981 to a plant closings seminar cosponsored by :hz U.S. Department of Labor and the ',~rhit~ House. Cobb reported that in 1~0 :]one, 365 company and worker groups signed agreements simJ- ]:r to Disston's and the Stee]workers' that a~fected 200,000 workers. The ~.~cnpower A,diustment Committees ~ sted an average of one year. Two- ::;i~c;s of the workers participating cb~i,".ed almost immediate em- plo)'mcnt. Harvard Business Review Althoug~h the typical closing involves between S00 and 600 employ- ees, the Canadians have had experience with large layoffs as well. A.L. Cobb brought with him to the plant closings seminar a UAW-Ford-MCS team. They reported their experience of using the Manpower Adiustment Committee approach in a maior layoff of 2,000 workers at Ford Canada's OakviBe, Ontario plant in May 1980. Their pro- gram was similar to Disston's except that it set up separate.committees for hourly and salaried employees, which met for the eight months it took to complete their mission. Despite a seri- ous downturn in the economy, of those seeking help, 94% received jobs. The company and the federal and the pro- vincial governments split the $60,000 cost of the program. The diversity of industry in the Hamilton-Toronto labor market area was a big contributor to the committee's success. The'company and the union ~greed on five reasons for starting the program: 1 To give employees assistance in securing alternative employment. 3_ To allay the fears of employ- ees still at work by demonstrating that they could expect positive assistance if fiarther layoffs became neces, saty. 3 To relieve the impact of m~ss unemployment on the community. 4 To pro}ecl a favorable image to the Public by accepting responsibil- ity for assisting employees. 5 To lessen the drain on sup- plemental unemployment benefits. The government gave two reasons for its involvement: 1 To relieve serious Unempl°y- menr in the area. 2 To lessen unemployment insurance costs by providing alterna- tive employment." Other countries' experience. Canada is not alone. Western European countries and Japan all have standard procedures for handling plant closings and permanent layoHs that are light- years ahead of the United States in their concern ~or the affected workers and communities. In 1978, a group o~ us rom the automakers', stee}workers', and machinists' unions, the U.S. De- partment o{ Labor, and the U.S. Depart- merit of Commerce visited Sweden, . Germany, and England to see such programs'LL~sthand. The emphasis in these coun. tries' programs is also on reemploy- ment and. retraining rather than on - ... providing financial support in unem- ployment. The most comprehensive :. outplacement efforts go on in Sweden, where by law a company must give advance notice of a dosing, the amount of time ahead depending on the size of the closing or layoff. With strong com- pany, union, and co~unity support, . the Regional Labor Market Board takes primary responsibility for outplace- ment. Immediately after the company announces the expected clos~g, the board establishes iOb-finding centers at the facility that link up with a n~tion- wide' computerized fob vacancy identi- · fication system. Companies across the court-- try are req~red to list all vacancies with the National Labor Market Board, a government agency largely mn by a joint Iabor-management board of direc- tors. Federal funds for moving and retraining are available, as are indus-. trial development subsidies for We saw h6w all this works. Vikmanshyttan, a small steel-r~king village in central Sweden. In 1976, ' Stora Kopparber~ the only employer'.in Vikmanshyttan, closed its 500-year-old steel mill. The Regional Labor Market Board, the company, the union, and the community leaders a~teed on a plan. Through intensive industrial deve!op- ment efforts, the coalition recruited nine small companies to locate in former mill buildings. One was a small business that was to produce a new product developed by former steelworkers. With assistance from · Labor Market Board subsidies, the companies provided new iobs for Stora% ~*0 workers. The city built roads to serve the new plants. 'i During the transition time, Stora Kopparberg employed the work- ers to rehabilitate the old mill struc- tures for their new users and to rebuild the road system. During the same time, some workers attended a nearby Regional Labor Market Board voca- tional training center to acquire ne, skills, and some worked on loan for ~ while for the forestrf agency. Although the workers were still employed by IContinued on page 12] 12 Store Kopparberg, the 'bor Market Board subsidized 7S% of.their wages tm the to three-year l triod this ~e-saving effort took. ~ Go--any also, ~c law requires · ~aming. ~e~ore h ~n close a pl~t, ~ company and its works co~cil must draw up and a~ee on a "social pl~" ~at spells out a course of action Jot evew affected worker. ~or some, the pl~ may ~volve simple outplacement ~ simfia~ jobs. ~or others;it may m~n rewaining, h may even m~n mov~g to another c~/. Implementation is largely a company r~ponsibiliry, but large government subsidies are evil- able. In 1981, displaced worken averaged only two ~eeks' idle time before ~ey received other jobs or s~rted ~ezraining pro,ams. How would it work in the United States? Although it is far less com- prehensive than dither the Swedish or the Ged-Than plan, the Canadian approach should prove more acceptable to Americans. Except for the required advance notice, it is completely volun- taD: It u~es the cooperative labor- management committee approach with which we have extensive experi- ence in this country: It depends far less on government and more on the pri- vate sector, and it is far ]ess costly.' What are the chances of replicating a simple, effective system like Canada's in the United States.~ Through legislation, not good. Plant closing legislation has become a bitter bone of contention in both Congxess and state legislatures. Management . and hbo-, have lined up on opposite sides of the barricades. This develop- ment is a sure precursor to stalemate. Senator Orrin Ha=ch of Utah, chairman of the Senate Committee on Labor and Euman Resources, has introduced a bill on worker readjustment in plant closings - S.2650- that incorporates parts of the Canadian approach, includ- ing an ingenious provision for volun- tm'y advance notice, hut knowledge- able observers give it little chance of · p~ssins. The job Training and Part- nership Act, however, which addresses v par~ of the problem, by authorizing in Ha~'ard Business Review Title III limited funds tot retraining displaced workers, hhs passed and is scheduled to into etfect on October 1. It authorizes limited funds for job- search training, job clubs, and skill training. These are to be administered locally by managemem-dominated pri- vate industry councils, or PICs. So companies and unions desiring to estabhsh joint outplacement commit- tees now have a source of matching bands previously unavailable. It is a new tool to work with, but the initia- tive to use it is still theirs. Legislative aid or the lack of it should not be an excuse, however, ~or progressively minded managements &nd unions not to improve on today's crude, ierry-buih, cut-and-run plant- closing practices. Companies like Dana Corpora tion~ Brown and Williamson, and International Silver offer good examples of how to improve plant dos- · lng. All three participated in the labor Department's january 1981 plant clos- ings se .miner. The unions involved in these cases were the UAW, the Machin- ists, the Bakery and Confectionery Workers, the Rubber Workers, and the Steelworkers. Dana Corporation, one of the nation's leading automotive parts manufacturers, headquartered in Toledo, has come as close to replicating the Canadian model as any U.S.. com- pany. At the seminar a mar/agement- labor team reported on the closing of Dana's Edgerton, Wisconsin factory in 1980. The Da'ne model. With the oil embargo of 1973 and 1974 and the gasoline shortage of 1979, the demand for front axles for vans and trucks evap- orated. Dana decided it had to close the Edgerton plant, a nine-year-old, 900,000-squaredoot facility with .a young productive labor force. In addi- tion to oHering preferential hiring and relocation assistance {which were of little use because 30% of Dana's employees nationwide were then on layoff J, severance pa); supplemental unemployment insurance [though the fund was then just about exhausted}, and extended health insurance [per- quisites all negotiated with the UAWI, Dana developed an outplacement training program and a job search cen- ter. At a previous shutdown at Ecorse, Mic'higan, Dana had used a Detroit consulting firm to handle the closing. At the time several of Dan~'s trainers went through the course as well. At )uly-^u~ust .1983 ., Edgerton, the Dana trainees handled ~e closing themselves through theix "Dana Dni etsit ;°' a ttaininl eente : ~t Dana's Toledo h~dq~e~. In ~he 1 g-hour mur,e, ~e : Dana workers undertook a ~k~s inventoD; practiced r~sum~ wfifin[ and listened to motivating ~. · ~e course also ~duded s~sions communist/on ski~s, fin~ci~ ning, and re~rement pl~g. M~t impormm to the success of &e pr~ ~am was ~e job center &at D~a hal set up wi& the help of the ~ion and &e Wiseons~ Job $e~iee. At ~e Was~on seminar, Dana's P~I Mushy re,ned &at 'we allmt~ a section of our offi~ ~d We it to people and ~id, ~ere are d~ks, here ate reference materials, here ~e papen bom all over &e'count~ ~d here ~e bulletin boards ~or job nofie~ ~d suc- cess stories. Here is the job se~ee mkrofiche equipment, here are tele- phones. Use ~emg We placed no .' restfi orions on anybody. We didn't w~t people to ~1 Europe, but they - could ~11 all over &e mun~.lhafl one person ~lting me in Toledo out his tdephone tec~iqueJ' Run Sanderso~ president the 1o~1 UA~ fo~d ~& the co~e . and the center help~l: "h gave u, a · ." go~ self-ima ge and b~sted our morale. I think when you get down ~ the dumps, you need some&~g .you up. h did a good job. We work~ under the buddy system, which was good feature. In other words, we t~med up with one or two peo- ple and made sure that we used vice provided lot us. We used the telephone to make ~lls to prospective employers. We used the microfiche setup to ~ind om which areas of the countW or sure were l~g for ~r- rain t~es of workers. "The other key thug was this se~ice was provided in &e plant. h was an atmosphere that we were. used to. To go down to lob Semite, especially the one ~ ]anesville, where you h~ve 5,000 or 6,000 hid-off people, wasn't helpful-you c~ imagne how congested an office like that gets. So being ~ble to go into our old plato utilize ~he se~'ices right there was a big help ~o us." Dana also made an a~es- s~ve job development chore. According to ]er~/Ward, Dan~'s industrial tela- ~ions manager, "We were through ]u]y-A~st 1~88 14 the list of employers in Wisconsin, looking ior all of those that would have machine operations similar to ours. We came up with 2,740 in the state of Wisconshn and another 500 in the four northern counties of Illinois. We mailed letters to 3,250 employers, including a list of all the people, listed by various skills and categories, who. had gone on our job search program. There was a total of 15 pages in that letter. The response was astounding, and the requests were tremendous. It proved again that on~y about 30% of available jobs are listed or advertised. I worked through Job Service em- player committees and invited various employers to go through our plant, to s~ that our worker was more qualified than a guy who's putting a nut or a bolt on:' In add/don, for one year follOWing the factory's closing, Dana maintained an office in the area to assist employees with problems and to handle medical claims~ Under Dana's preferential h/ring program, other Dana plants · hkod a number, of employees. If the employees were qualified to do the work, they were eligible for relocation assistance of up to two months' pay. Dana offered other jobs to 29% of hdgerton's ~alaried employees and to 20% of the hourly winkers; Other companies gave ~obs to 112 former Edgerton employees. This reemploy- ment effort is continuing, l:or example, when a small warehouse opened in Fogelsville, Pennsylvania,. the manager determined that Dana people would fill aI1SS jobs. Workers came ~om not only Edger. ton but also Athens, Geor- gia; Havana, Illinois; Toledo, Ohio; and Readin$ Pottstown, and Berwick, Pennsylvania. A survey of the 250 employ- ees who elected to use the job search program indicated that 86% of the houri), and 95% of the salaried employ- ees found jobs; ~8% of the hourly and 59% o[ the salaried employees rook less :hen six months to find work, the b.qance ]ongen But as the recession deepened, not ali kept their jobs- months after the plant closed, only 63% of the hourly and 88% of the sala- ried workers reported still having work. Other exemplar)' shutdown experiences reported at the January, 1981 plant closing seminar were Brown and Williamson in Louisville wi~h the Harvard Business Review Baker, Confectionery & Tobacco Work- ers and M.achinists~ the international Silver Company with the Steelworkers in Meriden, ConnecticuB Empire- Devroit Steel with the Steelworkers in ~orrsm0uth, Ohio; and Lee Tire Ja Goodyear subsidiary] with the Rubber Workers in Conshohocken, Pennsylva- nia. These companies and unions have demonstrated convincingly that, work- ins togethcz, management and labor can help workers and their families w~ather plant closings and speed the uansition to new iobs. Experience teaches A model program drawing on these experiences should focus prima, r- fly on teemploymem in new jobs, with income support to bridge the gap. It should include the best features of Canada's Manpower Consultative Ser- vice plus the U.S. innovations of sell- directed iob search and job clubs. It shOUld also include half-day briefings by community agencies spelling out for a~ccted families the resources their towns provide, such asunemployment insurance, food stamps, and welfare, and how to obtain them. The best model here is the Illinois AFL-CIO;s program that the AFL-CIO's Human Resources Development Institute in Washington has recently repl,!cated and made available nati6nally. In addition to the financial safety net that exists in the master agreement or that should be negotiated when closing is armounced {continua- tion of hospitalization insurance until reemployment should be high on'this listl, a responsible program should include at least the following nine features: I Advance notice. Because leg- islation to provide advance notice has long been stymied in Congress and numerous state legislatures, workers will probably only hear of their plants' shutdowns as a tesuh of collective bar- gaining or enlightened management practice. I first learned about outra- geously mismanaged shutdowns in the anthracite area of Pennsylvania· My instructor was a ha~d coal mine in Coaldale. l was secretary of labor and industry in Governor George Leader's reform c~binet in thc late 1950s, when' a mine management there announc~ on Friday that the followLug Monday the mine would be closed permanentl~ throwing 2,000 miners out o~ ~obs. We rushed a team in to expedite registra- tion for unemployment insurance and iob search, but the total absence o~ notice made any intelligent effort at planning or programming hopeless. Shortly after that, U.S. Steel closed a captive soft coal mine in Fay- time- to arrange with the company fm office space at the mine'head; to cen- tralize state, ~ompany, and union resources for taking unemployment insurance claims; to prepare job devel opment, counseling, testing, and out- placement programs.- Even today, a generation ' later, companies like our Coaldalc anthracite mine often close with no advance notice. Robert McKersic and Robert Aronson, in their excellent study of three plant closings in New" York State, relate how with no advanc~ notice at all the GAl: Corporation reduced its Binghamton operations b~ ' 1,100 workers in 1977.Not only did a this precipitate action re%miry the traumatic effect on the workers, their~ ' families, and the community; it also left no time for planning and imple- menting an orderly outplacement dfort2 - Recognition of the need fot l planning time is nothing new. In theft' classic 1966 book, Strategies for Dis- placed Workers, George Shulm and Arnold Weber described their experi- ence as third-parw hEpers to the Armour Compan); and the Meat Cut(~ rets' Union, representing thousands ~ workers dislocated by the closing of .aa Armour plants throughout the Mid- west. They concluded that six monthst or preferably a year's advance notice was 'a procedural prerequmte for co~ structive action. It gives the various organizations some time to organize their programs and permits employees: to adiust their own plans as well as to consider the various available optJon~ with care.'" ette County at the opposite comer of .~ . · . Pennsylvania. Alerted by the company,] -i', '. i well beforehand, I visited the vice pr~-~ i:.'~' (' :' ' idem for coal production and thc -.~. 'iS'[ '. Steelworkers Union in Pittsburgh, and~ ':.' '.< we agreed on a tripartite outplacemen(t ":~:: effort. This advance notice from a ~ i" "y' responsible management gave us .TL' .:]' · :' 16 Recently several unions have succeeded in getting aclvance contracts. Thc Steelworkers' contract stipulates three months ~d thc Rub- bcr Workers', six. Although hst-ditch efforts to kccp Uniroyal Rubber phnts open in ~assachusttts and Michigan riled, most reports that these advance notice provisions arc proving their worth..Advancc notice of ~o scheduled closings U.S. Steel's structural steel mills ~bridgc and S~Jflcr in ~estcm PcnnsyDania did leave time for nego- tiating contract'modifications that kept thc plants open. When they closed their Lou- 'JsviIlc i~cilhy, Brown and Williamson provided more than zwo y~rs' notice. As Canoll T~c, labor relations vice president, explained, "This ~adual phase-om has allowed affected employ ets to make required job transition in a more oracr]); l~ss c~otional]y d~sturb- ins marmon h has provided for a stag- g~red i~)ux of new workers into general ~ob markets and thus reduced ~mmunity unemployment burdens ~d minimi:ed competition between workers who once stood side by side. Senior employees had thc option to l~ve ~c comply ~rlicr ~an ~unio~ employees to enhance thci~ chances of finding sui~blc jobs elsewhere/' 2 Joint labor:management out- placement committees. The 20 years of Canadian ex"perimentation with joint committees provides hundreds of cases that U.£. companies and unions can use as examples for setting up similar joint efforts. In nonunion plants the employees can choose the worker members, and as in the case of Dana at ' Edgerton, the committee can arrange fo," employment service participation. As in Canada, the committee's main .role would be to see that everyone requesting outplacement help got it and that before the plant gates closed as many as possible were placed in acceptable jobs. 3 Job search training. Our model committee would take on an added function that the Canadians haven't tried-job search training. Dana at Edgerton :aught this skill, as have increasing numbers of U.S. manu- facturers, such as Lee Tire at Consho- hocken, Firestone at six of its closed Harvard Business Review plants, General Electric at Ontario, Califom!a, and Crucible at Midland, Pcnn$)'Nania. Man%cmcnt~ unions, and workers agree that such training is generally helpful, although the success rate, of course, heavily depends on the labor market. 4 Job clubs. Close on the heels of going through the job search train- ing, a worker should join a job club. ]ob dubs are an exciting innovation in social engineering that Nathan Azrin, in southern Illinois, Albert Cullen and joseph Fischer in Cambridge, Massa- chusetts, and Charles Hoffman in San Diego have pioneered with backing from the U.S. Labor Department's Work .Incentive Program. Few experiences in life are as isolating as looking for a job. The job club helps combat that isolation. It is a place where workers can put into prac- tice the techniques they have learned in job search training. Working together in small groups, reinforcing each other's efforts, they use the buddy system. The job club should be located in a convenient place and equipped with telephones, desks, industrial directories, Yellow Pages, and want ad sections/tom Sunday papers serving n~arby cities and selected growing labor markets. At its Ontario plant, GE converted the recreation center just . across from the plant gate into a retraining and outplacement center and job club. In Midland, Pennsylvania, workers used the baserrient of the Steel- workers' Union Hall, which Crucible had outfitted with surplus partitions. 5 Aggressive job development. job development works best when the company takes the leading role, as. Dana did in Edgerton and Disston and l:ord did in Ontario. The company has contacts with suppliers through its purchasing department, with custom- ers through its salespeople, and with the business community generalh/. A company simply cannot leave this task to state employment services. They lack the access to other employers that a company has, the), have other clien- teles to serve, and despite almost unprecedented demand io'r their ser- vices, the), are losing staff because of state budget cuts. 6 Skill training. Mos~ al. is- placed workers do not undertake train- ]ul¥-A~agust 19113 · ins in a new skill or occupation. One s;udy of a Midwestern plant closure in the 1960s showed that almost two- thirds ot the wor~er~ lalcl o~I x~,ere ins no effort to obuin retraining, although it was c~t free. ~o~et study in 19~ of British steel plant rev~led that only 20% were taking advanuge of ~etr~n. inS. Participation ~as higher mong the youngir anti alt~dy higher skil!e& ~terest in ~mraining app~red to decline with advancing y~m.' At ~e Do~vet ~oject Wa~e Counw, Michigan in 198~, about 25% of the worke~ laid off in plant closings sought and obuined skill training. E~efience indi~tes ~et~a~ing will prg~de an inswer for only a minohw of the counw's Bis- placed workers. · For that minofi~ there are some resources available now that we have nm had before. In addition to 50% matching ~ds in Title m of the Job Train,s and Developm~t Act, ~;hi~ partici~ting sums wiB some- ho~ have to find money to match, them are ~ovafive tetraimg pr~ ~ams emoting ~ mllective bargain- ~g. The largest is the UAW-Ford Employee Dex, dopment and ~ain~g Pro,am, which provides not only retraining for active employees but' also retracing, joNs~rch, and plaCe- ment assiSunce fo~ laid-off em It is now being used to issist Ford workers laid off in Ford's Milpitas, ifomia and Sheffgeld, Mabama plant Closings. Jones & ~ughlin ahd ~e Steelworkers ha~e esublished ~ pre ~am in Midland, Pe~sylvania to · ~etrain fome~ Crucible Steel Compan~ workers, who used m make steel at plmt J&L has recently bought. I&L also plans to offer job search and s~ll] training to interested ~mployed zens of this and neighboring com- . inanities. 7 Quali[ied company person. nel to help out. For almost a yea~ afte~ the Edgerton plant closed, Dana kept ~] skeleton personnel staff to provide counseling, job development, and otbJ assistance to laid-off workers. To fill these roles Gerald Newmin, presiden! of International Silver, recruited Rober~ Treloar, a talented ~alesman ~ IContinued on page 20] :t 2O himself a casualty'of the closing. Tre- ]oar received his training in outplace- ment skills thxough a consulting service. $ Third parties. Most of the companies in our sample got help bom outside consultants. When a shutdown occurs, it is often a first for the com- pany, the union, and the community. Someone who has been through it several times before can be a gre~t help. Managements report that the savings in unemplo)~ent insurance ~xes and suppJemehtary unemployment bene- fits offset th~ casts many times over. When Empire-Detroit Steel closed its sates, the Portsmouth, Ohio CETA, under Dick Bussa, was the cata- lyst for organizing an innovative migration effort. David Brown and Meredith Associates helped Imerna- tional Silver. Lee Tire used Tom Jack- Harvard Business Review son's Career Development Team ~om New York. " 9 Industrial development. The January 1981 co~erees reported little about their efforts to help the com-. munities they lek replace the lost iobs. Dana did report that it had sold its plant to the C~terpilla~ Tractor Com- pany, which planned to employ $00 people by 1983. Because of the reces- sion, plans have been slow to develop. Caterpillar now employs 49 in Edger-. ton; $0 of these new jobs have gone to former Dana workers. With little thought for the effect on the community or former employees, companies leaving a com- munity, usually turn over their redun- dant plants to their corporate indus-. trial real estate people or to an industrial zealtor to dispos& of for 'top dollar. I recall two cases in which state ]uly-A~ffust 1993 and federal agencies intervened to tilt the s. cales in the public interest direc- tion and companies proved coopera- tive. In ] 960, when Ford closed its c' ' Chester, Pennsylvania factory, it h~ two purchase offers. The higher bid was ~rom ~cott Paper, which wanted to use the plant fo~ warehousing, and the Other was bom Reynolds Metals, which wanted to use it for manu- {acturing. · · At the suggestion o{ Gover- nor David L~wmnce, I asked Ford's management i~ there was a~y way thatl it could keep the plant in manufactur- ing because of the lasge number of iol~. that that would create. Ford agreed to · offer Reynolds the opportumty to match the klgher bid, which Keynolds~ promptly took. Just last y~at, Reynold~ closed the plant, but in the meantime [Continued on page 221 " UNIVERSITY 'EXECUTIVE EDUCATION STRATEGY: CONCEPT TO IMPLEMENTATION September 25 - October ~, pro, ram to help e~ecutboe, s dev~Jop and implement appropriate strategies. MANAGING CRITICAL RESOURCES October 10 - 21, 1983 February 6 - 17, 1984 . : A ,~neral pro,ram to assist operating executives ~n the management Of their human, physical. ]inanclal, and market resources. MANUFACTURING h4~NAGEMF-N~r PROGRAM October 23 - November 3, 1919 April 23 - M~,y 4, 1984 of ~heir operations. MARKETING AND SALES EXECUTIVES' PROGRAM November 6 - 18, ·1983 May 6 - 15, 1984 A program to assist operating executiu~s in the planning and e~ecutlon of sales and marketing strale,g'y. THE COLGATE DARDEN. GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION'! an'nounces its two-meek general and funcfforml management de'oelopment p~'ograrrL$. For farther information write or call: Samuel P Cha~e, )r ,Ast, ociate The Darden Graduate Business University of Virgini~ P.O. Box 6550 Charlottesville, Virginia Telephone: (8041 Chester ~d h~d ~0 ~rs o~ ~rther emplo~em. When in ~h~ ~fly 1960s G~ its plant in thc Mohawk Valley x~llage o{ Clyde, New York, Clyde's ente¢fising mngessman, 5ra~ Hot- ton, invited top executives to his ~pi- tol Hi~ office to explore ~th a ~oup us bom ~e ~ Redevelopment A~inistrafion IAi} what could save Clyde from ~e crippling blow of los~g its major employer. ~at evolved ~ p]~ whereby GE donated ~e pl~t to a 1o~1 ~evetopment co~ox~fion set up fox this pu~ose. GE ~so helped Clyde find a supplier lo~ed in Clevel~d to purchase it. Clyde then used ~e pr~ ~eds from the sale to develop ~ ~dusrfial park on adja~nt land ~d to bring in o&er employers. The A~ helped out with lo~s ~d ~m~ for sewer ~d water 1~. The town ended up ~'i~ more jobs ~d more ~versifi- ~tion ~an h had had ~fore GE closed · e plant. ~so, diversifi~tion me~t &at the co--unity would be i~une to the cycli~l f~st and famine pla~es one-indus~ commu~fies. Two of ~e most comprehen- sive ~es of developing indus~ ~ou~ pl~x closings ~cu~ed ~ ~n ~d F~ce. Thxou~ a subsidi~ esubIished for this pu~ose, British Sxe~l Co~oration pro, des fin~cial ~d tec~cal assistance and ine~en- siva space to ~11 s~es of eme~fises-. from multinationals to two-m~ 'machine shops- that will manufacture ~ romar steel mills ox new pl~ts spe- 'ci~ly considered on old mill proper- ties. ~one-Poulenc, ~rance's largest ch~ical manufacturer, not only pr~ rides uhis oppormni~ but also pro- ~des equiD' 5nanc~g ~d sometimes enters parm ersh~ps with companies lo,ting ~ the~ radiant faculties. Worker o~ership is sti~ ~other Mtemadve. ~ 1981, GM helped the workers at its Hyatt Being pl~t in Cl~k, New Jersey buy ~d operate the f~ciliD~ General Motors provided 5100 million in o~ders for sew era] year~. Sou~ Bend Lathe ~ ~diana, the Library Bureau in Herkimer, New York, ~nd R~th P~cking Compan? D~venport, Iowa are other plant clos- ing examples where this has proved a l~fesaver for the community. In all these cases, the Commerce Department's Economic Development ~dministrat~on, Harvard Business Review successoL provided critical financing. Lf Congress implements proposed budget cuts in which this most useful . agency is scheduled for liqui~tion, EDA's assistance will come to an end. /kkhough they ~e often more restricted than EDA's grants, as of now Urban Development Action Grants axe still available from the Depatment of Housing and Urban Development. If the CanacLians can, why can't we? q'here is no mystery abou'c what n~eds to be done when plants close: help displaced workers find new jobs. Existing management presenting new products or services, using the same workers with new skills, is one alternative. A new management, pro- ducing thc same product with thc same labor force and skill, is another. Worker ownership is a third. Where the plant carmot be sav6d, a joint labor- management comxnhtee with an cffec- five outsider as chairman and the mission of helping find new jobs {or their displaced workcr~ bc~urc thc fac- tory doors shut is still another. No one model will fit egcry situation, just aS no one shoe will fit every foot. But men of goodwill ~rom both management and ~ion- combining their knowl.edge of people and labor markets-can, in~ spirit of cooperation rather t2~an confrontation° design and implement programs tO fill the fearful, wasteful, and senseless vac- uum that workers face today. From Ontario, CMifornia to Ontario, Canada, from Wisconsin on the Great Lakes to Ahbama on the Gulf of Mexico, there is a wealth of experience to draw on. Concerned pub- lic officials can act as c~talysts, but fl an effective iob is to be done, manage- ments and unions of the plants closing down must take the lead. A~ter all, who 'knows these workers be~ter and who should feel a grea~et sense of responsi- bility for their ~,elfaxe than the compa- nies they have wor~ed for and the unions they have belonged to? July-August 1993 Re[exences ~w dis~bo:~ by ~ ?J~ ~s: What PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Proposed. Maple Plain Interceptor This Hearing is being conducted by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission to solicit public testimony on the proposed Maple Plain Interceptor which is part of the overall regional wastewater treatment system of the Metropolitan Area. The Maple Plain Interceptor is part of the overall plan prepared under Section 201 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended. The Hearing will be conducted as follows: Date: Thursday, Time: 7:30 P.M. Place: November 17, 1983 Maple Plain City Hall Maple Plain, MN 55359~ 612-479-1123 This presentation will include dissertations on the technical, environmental, and financial aspects of the proposed plan. DESCRIPTION OF THE MAPLE PLAIN INTERCEPTOR The existin~ wastewater treatment plant ~n Maple Plain has a capacity of 0.22 million gallons/day (mgd) for a present tributary population of about 2,200. Significant rates of clear water enter into the Maple Plain sewer system in the spring during heavy rains and cause the treatment plant to be hydraulically overloaded. The increase in projected growth by year 2020, (650 additional people) plus the estimated flow indicates that a peak hourly flow of 950 gpm must be treated at or conveyed from the Maple Plain plant. The present plant can only treat 560 gpm because of limited raw sewage pump capacity. In addition to the hydraulic overload, there is also concern over phosphorus discharges to the Jennings. Bay portion of Lake Minnetonka. Alternatives were evaluated which would either expand the plant and include phosphorous removal facilities or phase the plant out and eliminate discharge.to the lake. The most cost-effective route has been determined to be phase-out of the Maple Plain Wastewater Treatment Plant by construction of an interceptor sewer to Long Lake. The interceptor sewer would consist of 26,000 feet of 10" forcemain, paralleling U.S. Route 12. The forcemain would terminate at the MWCC Pumping Station located in Long Lake. The estimated cost of this project is $1.448 million (1979 dollars ). Interested persons are invited to present their views and comments in person or in writing at the Hearing. Oral comments may be limited to five (5) minutes. Written statements may be mailed to Jean Bergal, Director, Public Information Office, located at the Commission's address, as noted hereinabove. Arrangements for comments may be made in advance by calling Ms. Bergal at 222-8423, extension 175. The Hearing Record will remain open until November 27, 1983. Copies of the project report(s) will be available for inspecti~on at the following locations from October 14, 1983 to November 17, 1983: (1) Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Public Information Office- 8:00 A.M.-5:00 P.M. Telephone: 222-8423, extension 175 (2) Maple Plain City Hall Maple Plain, MN 55359 612-479-1123 Please bring this notice to the attention of any persons you feel'would be interested in this matter. by: Metropolitan Waste Control Commission George W. Lusher ~ Chief Administrator CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 * Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 o Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake MinneWnka City Administrator Osmonson P.O. Box 452 Spring Park, Mn. 55384 City Manager Jon Elam 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Mn. 55364 Dear Pat and Jon: On Tuesday, June 21, 1983, we met at Lord Fletchers for a luncheon meeting with Mr. Herb Klossner of Hennepin County, to discuss Hennepin County #15 and the possibility of upgrading the present system between Navarre and Mound with turn-lanes to eliminate conflict with through traffic. At that time, Mr. Klossner's response was not favorable to improving the present two-lane system. He agreed to submit plans for a four-lane system. We all agreed to review them. This has been accomplished~and it is now time to meet as we originally agreed, and discuss the proposed concept designed within our three cities from Hennepin County ~19 and ~15 west to Mound. Please accept this letter as an invitation to meet with us at our City Council Chambers on Wednesday, November 2, 1983 at 7:00 P.M. I have discussed this with some of you attempting to arrange an earlier meeting, but there appears to be many conflicts during the day and other evenings. I do hope this date is satisfactory, if not, please call me at my office, 473-7358 and I will make other arrange- ments. If I do not hear from you, I will plan on November 2, 1983, as stated. Sincerely, City~dministrator cc: M~yor Rockvam Mayor Polston Mayor Butler BUILDING & ZONING - 473-7357 ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE - 473-7358 PUBLIC WORKS-473-7~35~/~ '~O: ~C.hief Wold SEt ~ Roy ,'.:OM: Officer m. wald INTEROFFICE .;'~DJECT: Duty hours, Mound Police Reserve MEMO · DATE October 18 The duty hours donated 'my the Mound Police Reserves for the month of September, 1983 are as follows. Organizational meetings Trainim~ Reserve Squad Patrol Riding with. Regulars CPR Instruction First Aid instruction Administ~atio~ School Activities Special Duties Call-out ('lomt child) 1 Grandview School Seahorse ~sc. Details Miscellanous Hours Sanding jeep Vehicle Yzint. 83 ~ 3/~ n0 1/z 92 3/4 12 37 m 3/4 99 1/u TOTAL SEPTE~ DUTY HOURS 945 3/4 INTEROFFICE MEMO FR~:. SUBJECT: Jon Elam Chief Bruce Wold ~,bund Police Reserve DATE.,,Oct°bet, 26 , ,,,~983 Jon, I gave you'a copy of a memo showing you the break down of the hours worked by members of the Police Reserve in the month of September. I would like to br'.~ng your attention to a few of the activities worked: Reserve Squad Patrol - These are hours spent on patrol in the City of ~bund. Reserve Officers augment the patrol schedule when a regular patrol officer is scheduled alone during the hours fr6m 6:00'p.m. to 2:00 a.m. The 92 3/4 hours worked represents the equivalent of 3/5 of a patrol officer during the month.· Riding with Regulars - These hours are spent with regular officers on routine patrol. Reserve officers assist in all phases of patrol work in this capacity. ?hello hours worked provides the police department with 2/3 of an officer over the'month's time. Special Duties;-Grandview School - Grandvim~ School suffers from vandalism, usually on weekends, on a random basis. The school admin- istrati6n requested assistance in hopes of catching the persbn(s) committing the vandalism. The reserve officers spent 54½ hours inside Grandview on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday nights over several weekends, attempting to catch a person in the act. The hours worked failed to turn up any suspects. During the budget hearings, I' emphasized the value of the Reserve Officer program.. The hours donated to the City during September is typical of the hours donated each month throughout the year. The reserve organiza- tion allows the Mound Police to Provide many segments of the population services that would be prohibitively expensive if performed by regular officers working overtime. U CC) Lad L ~ C m ~ C ~ L ~ m Lr, ~ · · ~ E ~ 0 0~- 000 ,.,. ~ n, ~O CC L L .C,~ Z D 0 ,.- m UD C-,- · "' C Ct'-"" ,-.,~ SEPTEMBER, 1983 "WHERE WILL CONSTRUCTION COSTS BE IN 1984" Since 1981 construction costs have been at an unparalleled Iow while inflationary increases have continued in the balance of the economy. This situation has, in part, been created by Iow work volumes and a more competitive marketplace in which construction firms do business. How have contractors managed to do work for fewer dollars when salaries, equipment and fuel costs have all been on the rise? The answer is... not very well. Contractors' bids have been lowered by reducing the return usually due them for the use of their equipment. This return is basically the money needed for equipment replacement. Three successive years in this en- vironment has created a tremendous equipment replacement need for contractors to meet. It isthe opinion of many, that when the work volume increases to a point where contrac-. tors can be more selective about the work they bid on as well as the prices they bid, major cost inbreases will occur. While early project planning has always been important, it may prove to be one of the most significant factors influencing bids in 1984. Early projects will likely continue to enjoy the lower bids which have been common the past three years. If the national economic turn around continues and the related work volume increases, the cost of pro- jects in the mid and latter part of the 1984 construction season ~ in the pa§~. Early project initiation and cautious estimating will be key factors in delermining whether or not a parti- cular project will receive the anti- cipated Iow bids of early spring. HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 1TY-935--6433 October 19, 1983 To Interested Parties Re: Public Meeting on Siting of Transfer Stations and Solid Waste Processing (RDF) Facilities I would like to invite you to the second of a previously-announced series of m~etings on siting the above kinds of facilities, a part of the resource recovery system being deVeloped by Hennepin County. These meetings do not pertain to siting of combustion facilities, sanitary landfills or hazardous waste treatment facilities. The second meeting, on search areas for transfer stations and processing facilities, will be held Wednesday, November 9, 1983 at 7:30 p.m., at the Golden Valley CityHall, 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley. Tne first meeting focused on the siting process to be used and general siting criteria. The paper enclosed with this letter, titled "Search Areas for Transfer Station and RDF Processing", describes the search areas which have resulted from application of the siting criteria reviewed at the prior meeting. Also enclosed is a paper, titled "Summary of Site Selection Process and Siting Criteria for Transfer Stations and RDF Processing Facilities", which sunm~rizes the process and siting criteria we are using, which were the subject of the first meeting. The overall site-selection process we are using will identify proposed locations for transfer stations and RDF processing plants. This process will become more specific, leading to future meetings on candidate sites, and finally proposed sites based on an economic evaluation of sites identified through the earlier steps. Although the County is not required to oonduct any meetings on this matter, we want to afford communities and interested and affected parties a number of opportunities for input at the various stages of this process. We expect future meetings to be held on December 7 and early //% January. The exact dates and locations will be established as the process progresses. I ask that representatives of groups limit their con~ents to ten (10) minutes, while individuals limit their ~ts to five (5) minutes. Should you have questions before or after the meetings, contact Mr. Warren Porter, Project Manager, at 935-3381, extension 235. Written comments may be submitted either before or after the meeting, and maybe considered as long as they are received in this office not later than seven calendar days after the meeting. Yours truly, Luther D. Nelson, P.E. ~( Director LDN/WKP :mvr Enclosures HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer October 20, 1983 REED & POND ATTOI~NL'~S A~' LAW MOUND. MINNESOTA ~3~4 Mr. Ned C. Podany 6165 Sinclair Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ned: This is to summarize the steps we are to take in connection with your swap of land with the City. Since one council member was opposed (at least without further study) to the vacation, it would seem wise .to file a petition for vacation yourself rather than. have the City Council do it on its own Motion. It only takes a majority if there is a petition but it takes 4/5ths votes to pass the vacation if' it's on the Council's own Motion. I feel that you would be the oniy owner of land abutting the portion of the park to be vacated and therefore you would constitute "a majority of the owner's land abutting". It is my opinion that no one else would need to sign the petition. However this matter should be cleared with Curt Pearson to see what his ruling would be. I understand that you're going to obtain a new legal description including a bit more land than you had originally intended so that it would not be necessary at a later time to request a set back variance when you wish to build a garage. It may be that this would make it necessary from the City's point of view to obtain a walking easement along the edge of the property which you would be acquiring. The first necessity is to get a correct legal description from the surveyor. I will proceed to draft a deed to be signed by the fee owner from which you are purchasing and a partial release of the mortgage. We should get started on this because it may take some time and the City will not wish to complete the vacation until they have this deed and mortgage release in escrow. Mr. Ned Podany October 20, 1983 Page Two It is possible that the City would just as soon have a permanent easement rather than the fee title to that part of Lot I which we have promised to give them. Giving them an easement rather than fee title would avoid going through the City's subdivision procedures and also avoid any possible requirement for filing a registered land survey with the Registrar of Titles. Sincerely yours, REED & POND Roger W. Reed RWR:jh ~on Elam Curt Pearson PS: I am sending a copy of this letter to Curt Pearson with the request that he giv~ me and Jon Elam his comments on sufficiency of having a vacation petition signed by you alone and upon the advantages and disadvantages to the City in accepting an easement rather than fee title. CITY OF WA YZA TA 600 RICE STREET, WAYZATA, MINN. 55391 PHONE 473-0234 October 18, 1983 Jonathan Elam, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr/~lam: The Wayzata City Council took action at its October 4th meeting urging the Department of Transportation's Aeronautics Divison to revise its rules relating to seaplane activity on Lake Mimnetonka. The Council is concerned that with increased recreational activity over the past several years a dangerous conflict is occurring on svmmer weekends particularly. The Council took~further action requesting that other Lake area communities, including the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol, also support their request to restrict seaplane activity. The specific request is to prohibit seaplane operations altogether on Saturdays, Sundays and national legal holidays between June 1 and Sep- tember 15 on Lake Minnetonka. At present the rules only prohibit operations on Lake Minnetonka from 11:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on those days. The rules also permit a holder of a Private or Personal-Use Seaplane Base License to land and takeoff during those times if operating from his base on the Lake. In addition, the Wayzata City Council will be considering its own ordinance prohibiting the permanent mooring of sea- planes within its harbor limits on Wayzata Bay to further restrict potential activity generated by Wayzata residents. Support in this action would be appreciated. As a suggestion, if you agree on the need to prohibit seaplane activity on the Lake altogether during the summer, I've included the letter sent to Commissioner Braun on the subject. A similar request by your City Council would add a valuable measure of support toward rules revisions. Yours very truly, David L. Bangasser City Manager DLB/j~ Eno. CITY OF' WA YZA TA 600 RICE STREET, WAYZATA. MINN. 553gt PHONE 473-02? October 7, 1983 Commissioner Richard Braun Minnesota Department of Transportation Room 411 Transportation Building John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul,.HN 55155 Dear Commissioner Braun: The Wayzata City Council took action at its October 4th meeting urging the Department of Transportation's Aeronautics Division to revise its rules relating to seaplane activity on Lake Minnetonka. The Council is concerned that with increased boat activity over the past several years, a dangerous conflict is occurring on summer weekends particularly. The specific request is to prohibit seaplane operations altogether on Saturdays, Sundays and national legal holidays between June 1 and Sep- tember 15th on Lake Minnetonka. The prohibition would be all inclusive and not permit the holder of a Private or PersonaliUse Seaplane Base License the one takeoff and one landing during the restricted times as now allowed. Please give the matter your serious attention and route this request to the appropriate division for consideration when rules revisions occur to Aeronautics Rules 14 MCAR 1.3001-1.3029. Yours very truly, David L. Bangasser City Manager DLB/j s AGENDA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District October 20, 1983 Wayzata City Hall 7:30 p.m. 1. Call to order; present, absent, staff. Reading and approval of minutes of the regular meeting of September 15, 1983, and the special meeting of September 29, 1.983. 3. Approval or amendment of October 20, 1983, agenda. 4. Presentation by Alderman Barbara Carlson, City of Minneapolis. 5. Hearing of permit applications. A. 81-77 John Fisher - grading and drainage plan for an abandoned gasoline station, Highway No. 7 and Highland Road, Minnetrista. B. 82-23 Charlton Consolidated Companies, Inc. - 180 unit condominium development on 13.93 acres, NE corner of Plymouth Road and Hilloway Road, Minnetonka. C. 83-30 Noble Company - grading and drainage for an 8 lot residential subdivision, west of Grant Lorenz Road, Shorewood. D. 83-61 Department of Natural Resources - construction of a public access, boat ramp and parking areas, Lake Virginia outlet, Victoria. E. 83-85 Ben Katzman - shoreline setback variance, 46.0 feet, for the construction of a porch addition, 5050 Meadville Street, Excelsior Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Greenwood. F. 83-90 P. Gary Petersen - grading and drainage plan for a 10 lot residential subdivision, east of Willow Drive, south of Luce Line Trail, Orono. G. 83-96 Landform, Inc. - grading and drainage plan for Phase II, Boulder Bridge Farm, Smithtown Road NE of Boulder Bridge Circle, Shorewood. H. 83-97 Ed Mahoney - placement of 45 lineal feet of rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Carman's Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Orono. I. 83-98 Susan Carrier - placement of 58 lineal feet of shoreline erosion protection, The Bluffs, Halsted's Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Mound. J. 83-99 A. Bruce Fruen - placement of 80 lineal feet of -rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Lafayette Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Tonka Bay. K. 83-100 City of Minnetonka - utilities plan for Golden Ridge Woods, Westridge Lane, north of Cedar Lake Road, 'Minnetonka. L. 83-101 John C. Thonander - grading and drainage plan for Golden Ridge Woods, a 4 lot residential subdivision, Westridge Lane, north of Cedar Lake Road, Minnetonka. M. 83-102 Mike Hayes - placement of 48 lineal feet of rip-rap sho~rosion protection, Spring Park Ba~, Lake Minnetonka~ N. 83-1~03 Russel Schreck - placement of approximately 117 lineal feet of rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Maxwell Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Orono. O. 83-104 Kenneth Dahlgren - placement of 50 lineal feet of rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Spring Park Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Mound. '-- P. 83-105 Shavers Lake Home owners Assoc. -'cattail removal by mechanical method, construction of a temporary dam, Shavers Lake, Minnetonka, Deephaven and Woodland. Q. 83-106 Elizabeth B. Owen - placement of 221 lineal feet of steel sheeting seawall to replace a wooden seawell, Peavy Pond Channel, Brown's Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Wayzata. R. 83-107 Bruce Olson - dreding, steel sheeting seawall, Enchanted Island, Upper Lake, Lake Minnetonka, Minnetrista. S. 83-108 Darrel Geske - Commercial development of Ou'tlot D, Victoria Commerical Development 2nd Addition, Victoria. 6. Correspondence. Hearing of requests for petitions by public for action by the watershed district. 8. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney. A. Treasurer's Report - Mr. Carroll (1) Administrative Fund Report Engineer's Report - Mr. Panzer (1) (2) (3) (4) CP-5 Painter Creek/Status Report MCWD/Taylor Agreement Preliminary Design for CP-8 Channel Improvements at Highway 100 MCWD/City of Minneapolis Creek Study Watershed Management Planning -2- C. Attorney's Report - Mr. Macomber 9. Unfinished Business. B. C. D. Rule and Regulation Revision/Chapter 509 District Initiated Maintenance Projects Bridge Obstruction Draft Permit Application Guidelines 10. New Business. 11. Adjournment 0618o -3- MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT September 29, 1983 The special meeting of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was called to order by Chairman Cochran at 4:10 p.m. on September 29, 1983, at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Cochran, Lehman and Andre Managers absent: Thomas and Carroll Also present were board advisors Panzer and Macomber. Chairman Cochran stated that the purpose of the special meeting was a work session with respect to the watershed management planning obligations of the district under Chapter 509. Mike Johnson, CitY Engineer from the City of Minnetonka, was present at the meeting. The engineer distributed a second draft of a revised Overall Plan outline dated September 1, 1983. The engineer advised the board that the revised draft reflects the changes made by the managers to date, particularly Section VIII on the Watershed Management Plan. The engineer reviewed with the managers draft text for Section III which was partially complete~. The managers discussed and reviewed the language in the draft document. The managers discussed the extent to which the engineer should, as a part of the revision process, propose deletion of language he considers to be obsolete from the present Overall Plan. The managers indicated they would favor the engineer proposing deletions and would like to see drafts which would identify existing language in the Overall Plan proposed to be deleted. Manager Cochran indicated that he had attended a Chapter 509 Metro Area Planning Committee meeting. He distributed a document entitled "Second Draft Statement of Goals and Policies, Valley Branch Watershed District." Manager Cochran stated that this goal and policy statement was indicative of what the Valley Branch Watershed District was doing under Chapter 509. September 29, 1983 Page 2 Manager Cochran also relayed information gained at the Chapter 509 meeting regarding the status of the Chapter'509 planning process in other watershed districts. The board reviewed the status of Advisory Committee composition to assist and advise the board in connection with its Chapter 509 p~anning obligations. There being no further business to come before the special meeting, Chairman Cochran declared the special meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. Albert L. Lehman, Acting Secretary 0725o MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT September 15, 1983 The regular meeting of September 15, 1983, of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was called to order by Chairman Cochran at 7:30 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Cochran, Lehman, Andre and Carroll Manager absent: Thomas Also present were board advisors Panzer, Reep and Macomber. Approval of Minutes.. The managers reviewed the minutes of the continuation of the public hearing of August 18, 1983. It was moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, that the minutes be approved as distributed. Upon vote the motion carried. The managers reviewed the minutes of the regular meeting of August 18, 1983. It was moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, that the minutes of the regular meeting of August 18, 1983, be approved as distributed. Upon vote the motion carried. Agenda Modifications The chairman was advised that Alderman Barbara Carlson would not be able to appear before'the Board of Managers this evening. Chairman Cochran then noted that the next matter on the agenda was the public hearing on the district's 1984 budget. Chairman Cochran inquired as to whether any members of the public present were present with respect to the 1984 budget. Determining that no persons were present at that time in connection with the budget, Chairman Cochran requested that the public hearing on the budget be moved on the agenda to follow permit applications as to which members of the public were present. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the agenda was modified accordingly. Approval of Permit Applications The managers reviewed a memorandum from the engineer dated September 9, 1983, indicating those applications which comply with September 15, 1983 Page 2 all applicable standards of the district and which were. recommended for approval on the terms and conditions as set forth in the written memorandum. Following discussion and review of the written memorandum, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the following permit 9pplications be approved subject to all terms and conditions as set 'forth in the engineer's written memorandum with the following modifications: · With respect to permit 83-71, condition number 3 be modified by inserting the phrase "including curb and gutter" after the word "paved" in the last line of recommendation 3. As to permit 83-93, that in the first paragraph, third line, the word "position" be deleted and the word "positive" be inserted in lieu thereof. 81-112 Lowell Zitzloff - approval of shoreline erosion protection by placement of 80 lineal feet of natural fieldstone rip-rap, north shore Halsted Bay, Lake ~innetonka, Mound. ~ 83-71 John Massopust - grading and drainage plan for a 3-lot residential subdivision, north of Fox Street, east side of Brown Road, Orono. 83-76 Jeffrey Swenson - road re-alignment, Bantas Point Road, floodplain of Gray's..Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Minnetonka. 83-77.. Robert Johnson - placement of 101 lineal feet of rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Fagerness Point, West Arm Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Orono. 83-79 John Sten - placement of 66 lineal feet of shoreline erosion protection, Casco Point Road, Spring Park Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Orono. 83-80 City of Minnetonka - street re-alignment, combine "H" Street and Gizmo Lane intersections at Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka. 83-82 Woodend Shores Assoc. - placement of approximately 195 lineal feet of rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Lakeview Drive, Upper Lake, Lake Minnetonka, Minnetrista. September 15, 1983 Page 3 83-84 Robert Floeder -placement of 20 lineal feet of rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, The Bluffs, Malsted Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Mound. 83-89 - Robert Morgan - 50 foot shoreline setback variance for the construction of a new home, Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 Enchanted Park, Upper Lake Minnetonka, Shorewood. 83-91 Brookside Development - grading and drainage plan for a superette and self-service gas station, Commercial Avenue at Arboretum Blvd., Victoria. 83-93 City of Chanhassen - utilities installation, storm sewer, Minnewashta Manor, 2850 Tanagers Lane, Chanhassen. Upon vote the motion carried. Tablinq of Permit A~Dlications The engineer s written memorandum dated September 9, 1983, recommended tabling of the following applications until such time as all required exhibits had been received. It was moved by Carroll, seconded by Andre, that the following applications be tabled until all required exhibits had been received: 83-88 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - twin 18" sanitary sewer channel crossing between Lake of the Isles and Lake Calhoun, west Lake Street, Minneapolis. 83-90 P. Gary Peterson - grading and drainage plan for a 10-lot residential subdivision, east of Willow Drive, south of Luce Line Trail, Orono. 83-92 Lundgren Bros. Construction - concept approval of a 376 unit mixed residential subdivision and a grading and drainage plan for Phase I, west side of Vicksburg Lane, north of County Road 6, Plymouth. Upon vote the motion carried. September 15, 1983 .Page 4 Robert Schmitt - dredging for navigational access, Excelsior Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Excelsior. 83-08 The engineer reviewed the application for dredging for navigational access to property on Excelsior Bay, Lake Minnetonkao The engineer advised the managers that this matter was previously before the board in February of 1983 at which time the matter was tabled with the request to the applicant to submit certain exhibits. The engineer advised the managers that the exhibits received did not demonstrate that the dredging requested was necessary to .allow adequate navigational access to the existing dock area. : It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Carroll, that the .application be tabled pending submission of appropriate documents to demonstrate that the project proposed represents the least amount of dredging necessary to provide adequate navigational access to the existing dock area. Upon vote the motion carried. Bernice Brooks - preliminary plat for Christmas Lake Addition, north shore of Christmas Lake, Shorewood. 83-72 The engineer reviewed the preliminary plat and grading and drainage plan for Christmas Lake Addition and indicated that ultimate development of the. property may or may not follow the plan submitted since the lots would be graded individually. The engineer recommended approval subject to the conditions' noted in his written memorandum. Following review and discussion with the applicant, .it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the application be approved subject"to all terms and conditions recommended in the engineer's written memorandum. Upon vote the motion carried. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board - restoration of 1,615 lineal feet of shoreline, north shore of Lake Nokomis, Minneapolis. 83-78 The engineer reviewed the after-the-fact application of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board for restoration of shoreline on the northern shore of Lake Nokomis. The engineer recommended tabling the application pending receipt of exhibits indicating the quantity of fill placed below the ordinary high water level and the regional flood elevation of Lake Nokomis and pending clarification by the DNR of what other requirements the applicant must meet to acquire a DNR permit. It was moved by Andre, seconded by Carroll, that the application be tabled as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. September 15, 1983 Page 5 Herb Johnson - grading and drainage plan for Norman Estates and Norman Estates Second Addition, northeast quadrant of Martha Avenue and Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka. 83-83 The engineer reviewed the application for grading and drainage plan approval. The engineer advised the managers that the 'plan complies with the requirements of the city's comprehensive drainage plan, but advised the managers that the city's drainage plan does not address water quality requirements of the district. 'The engineer recommended that the applicant be required to construct a sedimentation basin on the property. Following review and discussion of the city's drainage plan and the nature of the drainage from other properties along Minnetonka Boulevard to the forebay area, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Carroll, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer deleting, however, the recommendation that the applicant be required to install a sedimentation basin. Upon vote the motion carried. Fritz Widmer - grading and drainage plan for mini-storage facility, Commerce Blvd. north of Three Points Blvd., Mound. 83-87 The engineer reviewed the application for grading and drainage plan approval and recommended tabling the application pending receipt, of a design for revised outlet control structure to limit runoff to existing rates~ to control outflow velocity to less than one-half foot per second, and that pond storage be located above the regional flood level and that the property be seeded and mulched upon completion of grading operations. Following discussion, it was moved by Carroll, seconded by Lehman, that the permit be issued by the engineer upon receipt and approval by the engineer of the conditions specified by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Carlson Properties - preliminary grading and drainage plan for the Carlson properties, north side of Highway 12, east and west of 1-494, Minnetonka. 83-94 The engineer reviewed the application for preliminary grading and drainage plan approval for Carlson Center. The engineer explained that part of the property drains to a Minnetonka wetland and part to the Ridgeaven Mall drainage facilities. The engineer advised that rate control facilities are proposed as part of the City of Minnetonka's trunk storm sewer system at the location of present U.S. Highway 12 which are proposed to be constructed during 1-394 construction activities. The applicant has agreed to provide September 15, 198.3 Pac e 6 rate control on-site in the event 1-394 construction is delayed. The engineer reviewed a letter committing the applicant, to provide such drainage facilities. Following discussion and review by the board, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, that the application be approved subject to the condition that the applicant provide rate controls on-site in the event construction of 1-394 is delayed. Upon vo~e the motion carried. City of Minnetonka - construct street and utility improvements for -Carlson Parkway, Cheshire Land and Twelve Oaks Center Drive, north side of Hiqhway 12, Minnetonka. 83-81 The engineer .reviewed the street and utility improvements: proposed for Carlson Parkway associated with Carlson Center approved under permit 83-94. The consulting engineer for the city appeared · and indicated that the city accepts the additional condition recommended by the engineer in permit 83-94 for on-site control of runoff rates if 1-394 construction is delayed. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Charles Robinson - grading and drainage plan for a 4-lot residential subdivision with two existing homes, southeast quadrant of Willis%on Road and Minnetonka Drive, Minnetonka. 83-95 The engineer reviewed the application for grading and drainage plan approval and informed the managers that the city has requested the applicant to provide drainage to the existing pond on the property. The engineer recommended approval of the application · with the condition required by the city. It was moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, that the application be approved as submitted. Upon vote the motion carried. Landform, Inc. - grading and drainage plan for Phase II-Boulder Bridqe Farm. 83-96 The engineer advised the managers that the applicant had applied for grading and drainage plan approval of Phase II of the development of the site. The engineer informed the board 'that a concept grading and drainage plan for the entire site had been approved by the board in 1977 and that Phase I work had been permitted at that time. The engineer informed the board that the Phase II plan constituted a modification of the plan previously approved by the board and that the modification would reduce the drainage area and created some additional on-site storage which does September 15, 1983 Page 7 not presently exist. The engineer further advised the board that there have been problems regarding compliance with the conditions of the original 1977 permit and that the compliance problems had been noted by the engineer by letter to the applicant dated December 1980. The engineer recommended approval of the Phase II grading and drainage plan upon the applicant's compliance with all conditions of the 1977 permit for Phase I. FOllowing discussion of lack of compliance with the existing permit, it was recommended by Cochran, seconded by Lehman, that the Phase II application be tabled until the applicant demonstrates compliance with the existing permit conditions with respect to Phase I. Upon vote the motion carried. Bridqe Obstruction 11907 Cedar Lake Road The chairman noted that Robert Taylor, owner of the bridge structure at 11907 Cedar Lake Road, was present and the engineer stated that concept plans for bridge reconstruction had been submitted by Mr. Taylor. Accordingly, Chairman Cochran inquired whether any other persons were present on any other agenda items. Hearing none, Chairman Cochran requested that the agenda be modified to consider the engineer's report, Item 9(B)(2) on the agenda. The engineer reviewed the status of the matter and advised the board that following the last regular meeting, Mr. Taylor has proposed to increase clearance under the bridge between 16 and 18 inches. This would provide 3.5 feet of clearance above the water surface elevation at 200 cfs and 3.0 feet of clearance at 250 cfs. The engineer advised the managers that the cost estimate for the proposal was between $10,000 and $11,000. The engineer requested direction from the board as to the adequacy of the clearance proposed by Mr. Taylor and an indication from the board regarding the percentage of cost-sharing which the board would authorize in the event the board determined the proposed plan to be acceptable. The managers discussed the adequacy of the clearance in question and it. was the sense of the board that the proposed 3.5 feet of clearance above the 200 cfs surface level would be adequate for passage. The board also discussed the need for an easement across the property to provide portage to canoeists. Mr. Taylor expressed concern regarding providing an easement, noting that he feared that it would become a trail easement across the property and not simply used for portage. September 15, 198.3 Page 8 Following substantial review and discussion by the board, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Carroll, that the owner's concept plan submitted and reviewed by the board on September 15, 1983, was an acceptable bridge design and that it be accepted by the board. Upon vote the motion carried. The boar~ then reviewed the estimated construction costs and following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the district commit to pay two-thirds of the construction cost, not to exceed $7,250, toward the removal of the existing bridge span and replacement of the span with the bridge design approved at the September 15,:~1983, meeting and that the staff be directed to prepare an agreement w~th the owner to implement the district's : contribution. Upon vote the motion carried. The managers then directed the engineer to proceed to prepare plans to secure an easement across the property and for portage construction around the bridge. Correspondence Chairman Cochran noted the receipt of the following items of correspondence: 1. Draft of the Metropolitan Council's Surface Water Management Plan and Guidelines dated September 14, 1983. Manager Cochran directed that-copies be made for each manager. 2. Correspondence from the Office of Management, Hennepin County dated..SepEember 24, 1983. 3. Letter from the Water Resources Board to the Honorable Sally Olsen dated August 24, 1983. 4 Letter from James Nelson, Audubon Society regarding cooperative work with respect to bird population in the vicinity of Minnehaha Creek dated September 6, 1983. Petition of Lake Minnetonka Conservation District for an Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project/Painter Creek Subwatershed CP-5/Re-openinq Of Hearinq Record and Continuation of Reqular Meetinq Chairman Cochran noted receipt of a letter from Glen and Abby Rye indicating that they had not received individual notice of the hearing on August 25, I983, and that they might have difficulty September 15, 1983 Page 9 submitting comments prior to the close of the hearing record on September 9, 1983. Chairman Cochran moved, seconded by Lehman, that in light of the letter received from the Ryes and in light of the request of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for incorporation of a fish migration barrier into the project design, the hearing record be re-opened in order to receive additional public comment from landowners whose properties might be affected by the project; that the re-opened record remain open until.Tuesday, ~.$eptember 27, 1983, at 4:30 p.m.; that the engineer prepare and submit to the board an evaluation and recommendations regarding the DNR's request for a fish migration barrier; and that the board continue this regular meeting to Thursday, September 29, 1983, commencing at 5:00 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota, for the Purpose of reviewing the final hearing record, making findings, conclusions and an order regarding the project and, if the project is ordered, for the purpose of adopting a budget for the project and adopting the necessary tax levy resolution. Upon vote the motion carried. Cancellation of .Chapter 509 Work Session The board noted that a special meeting had been planned for September 22, 1983, commencing at 4:00 p.m. for the purpose of holding a work session regarding Chapter 509 Watershed Management Planning. In light of the action taken to continue the regular meeting to 5:00 p.m., September 29, 1983, the board, upon motion by Cochran, seconded by Lehman, canceled the September 22, 1983, meeting previously set for 4:00 p.m. and ordered that the special meeting for the Chapter 509 Watershed Management Planning be rescheduled to 4:00 p.m., Thursday, September 29, 1983, at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota, and that notice be given of such change. Treasurer's Report The treasurer distributed his monthly administrative fund report dated September 15, 1983, a copy of which is attached. Following review, the managers noted that on page 2 of 5 on line item HD-4 under the heading "current month," the number "$3,435" should be deleted and the sum "$351" be inserted in lieu thereof, and that on line item HD-6, the sum "$3,084" be inserted and that the "Eight months ended" column for line items HD-4 and HD-6 be adjusted accordingly. Following review, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, that the report of the treasurer dated September 15, 1983, be amended to incorporate the foregoing changes and September 15, 1983 Page 10 approved as amended and that the bills be paid as set forth in that report. Upon vote the motion carried. Public Hearinq on 1984 Budqets Chairman Cochra~ declared the public hearing on the 1984 budget open. Chairman cochran was advised that notice of the hearing had been published as required by law. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the minutes of the special meeting of September 8, 1983, were approved as distributed. Thereupon, Chairman Cochran called for comments from members of the public regarding the proposed budgets. Hearing none, the managers reviewed the proposed budgets as reflected in the notice of hearing. Proposed 1984 Administrative Fund Budqet Following review, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the following budget be adopted for the district's Administrative Fund for 1984: 1984 BUDGET ADMINISTRATIVE FUND HYDROLOGICAL DATA COLLECTION Stream Gauging Precipitation Recording Monitoring Lake Evaluations · Data Tabulation Groundwater Observation Water Quality Measurements HD-1 $ 4,000 · HD-2 1,000 HD-3 3,700 HD-4 6,100 HD-5 500 HD-6 8,OO0 ADMINISTRATION Secretarial, Supplies & Mailing Insurance Accounting & Auditing Engineering, Permit Review Engineering, Complaints ~ Viol. Engineering, General Legal Services A-1 $ 12,000 A-2 2,000 A-3 7,300 A-4 25,000 A-5 12,000 A-5-A 13,000 A-6 25,000 September 15, 1983 Page 11 Managers' Per Diem & Expenses Publications Control Structure Operation A-7 A-8 A-9 7,000 1,000 3,000 SPECIAL PROJECTS ' Upper Watershed Storage Other Cooperative Projects CP-5 CP $ 2,000 2,000 RESERVE Contingency Reserve CR $ 4;000 TOTAL 1984 BUDGET $138,600 CREDITS Fund Balance 12/31/83 (Est.) $ 13,600 $ 13,600 TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE LEVIED $125.000 The managers reviewed and discussed the proposed expenditures in the individual line items contained in the 1984 proposed budget as moved by manager Lehman. Upon vote the motion carried and Chairman Cochran declared the 1984 Administrative Fund Budget adopted. Proposed 1984 Water Maintenance & Repair Fund Following review, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the following budget be ad6pted for the district's Water Maintenance & Repair Fund for 1984: 1984 BUDGET WATER MAINTENANCE & REPAIR FUND Engineering Accounting & Auditing Dam & Control Structure Maintenance Municipally Initiated Cooperative Projects $ 2,000 1,000 3,700 10,000 19,300 Board Initiated Cooperative Projects 1984 BUDGET TOTAL $36,000 September 15, .1983 Page 12 CREDITS Fund Balance 12/31/83 (Est.) $61,000 DEBITS 1983 Commitments $40,000 $21,000 TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE LEVIED The managers reviewed and discussed the proposed expenditures in the individual line items contained in the 1984 proposed budget as moved by manager Lehman. Upon vote the motion carried and Chairman Cochran declared the 1984 Water Maintenance & Repair Fund budget adopted. Proposed 1984 Watershed Management Planninq Fund Following review, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the following budget be adopted for-the district's Watershed Management Planning Fund for 1984: 1984 BUDGET WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING FUND Legal Services Engineering Services Managers' Per Diem & Expenses Office Services & Supplies Mailing Accounting & Auditing Reserve $16,500 30,300 2,500 5OO 1,000 TOTAL 1984 BUDGET $50,800 CREDITS Fund Balance 12/31/83 (est.) $40,800 TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE LEVIED $!0j000 The managers reviewed and discussed the proposed expenditures in the individual line items contained in the 1984 proposed budget as moved by manager Lehman. Upon vo~e the motion carried and Chairman September 15, 1983 Page 13 Cochran declared the 1984 Watershed Management Planning Fund budget adopted. Tax Levy ResolutiOns In light of the adoption of the budgets for the Administrative Fund, Water Maintenance & Repair Fund and the Watershed Management Planning Fund of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the managers considered adoption of tax levy resolutions. ADMINISTRATIVE FUND TAX LEVY RESOLUTION MINNEHAHA CP~EK WATERSHED DISTRICT Manager Lehman offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Andre. RESOLVED, that a mill rate sufficient to produce $125,000.00 be levied upon all taxable property in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Number 3, Hennepin and Carver Counties, State of Minnesota, for the year of 1984, for the purpose of paying the administrative expenses for the District as provided by Minn. Stat. S112.61, subd. 3. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were 4 yeas and 0 nays as follows: ANDRE yea' CARROLL yea COCHRAN yea LEHMAN yea THOMAS Absent The Chairman declared the resolution adopted° WATER MAINTENANCE & REPAIR FUND TAX LEVY RESOLUTION MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Manager Cochran offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Carroll. RESOLVED, that a mill rate sufficient to produce $15,000.00 be levied upon all taxable property in the Minnehaha Creek September 15, 1983 P ge I4 Watershed District, Number 3, Hennepin and Carver Counties, State of Minnesota, for the year of 1984, for the purpose of maintaining a water maintenance and repair fund for the District as provided by Laws of Minnesota, 1974, Chgpter 187. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were 4 yeas and 0 nays as follows: ANDRE .yea ~.CARROLL yea COCHRAN yea LEHMJkN _yea THOMOkS Absent ~he Chairman declared the resolution adopted. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING FUND TAX LEVY RESOLUTION MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Manager Andre offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Lehman. RESOLVED, that a mill rate sufficient to produce $10,000 be levied upon all taxable property in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Number 3, Hennepin and Carver Counties, State of Minnesota, for the year of 1984.,. for the purpose of paying the increased costs of implementing watershed man~qement planning as provided by Minn. Stat. 5473.881, Laws of Minnesota, 1982, Chapter 509, Section 23. The question was .on the adoption of the resolution and there were 4 yeas and 0 nays as follows: ANDRE yea CARROLL yea COCHRAN yea LEHMAN yea THOMAS Absent The Chairman declared the resolution adopted. September 15, 1983 Page 15 Continuation of Public Hearing on 1984 Budgets Chairman Cochran noted the action of the Board of Managers to continue this.regular meeting to Thursday, September 29, 1983, at 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of considering proposed findings, conclusions and order with respect to the Upper Watershed Project/CP-5. The board, upon motion duly made and seconded, directed and ordered that the public hearing on the 1984 budget also be continued until that time and place for consideration by the board of a proposed budget for the Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project/CP-5, and for consideration of a tax levy resolution i.f the project is ordered by the board. Water Maintenance &'Repair Fund/Creek Clean Up The engineer reported that approximately 1,500 feet of creek shore in the City of Minnetonka and 3,000 feet of creek shore in the City of St. Louis Park were cleaned, debris removed and trees trimmed by the Tree Trust. Cascade Lane/City of Edina The engineer advised the board that he had reviewed survey data and bridge plans for the Highway 100 bridge. The engineer advised the managers that his investigation showed that the Highway 100 bridge may have been constructed to provide the cross-sectional area called for by the bridge plans. The engineer estimated the cost of removal of grout and sediment within the highway right-of-way at approximately $18,.500 and indicated his preliminary judgment that such modification of the bridge opening could reduce water surface elevations by approximately one and one-half inches at flows of 200 cfs. The board directed the engineer to meet with the City of Edina to further review the matter. Galpin Lake Petition/City of Excelsior The engineer reviewed the status of work undertaken by the district in response to the petition of the City of Excelsior for Galpin Lake drainage improvements. The board reviewed a memorandum from the engineer dated August 9, 1983, setting forth the history of the petition and identifying the repair work to which the district had previously contributed under the Water Maintenance & Repair Fund. The engineer advised the board that the city previously requested that the district forgive the investigative costs incurred by the district in response to the petition and that in response to September 15, 198.3 Page 16 that request, the district had indicated that in light of the fact that the amount actually spent on repair of the system"was substantially less than the allocation, the district would be willing to forgive an amount equal to the difference between the actual cost and the allocated amount, but had not been presented with reasons just.ifying forgiveness of the remainder. Subsequently, the City of Excelsior adopted a resolution requesting the petition be withdrawn on the condition that the C~ty not be required to pay the costs resulting from the petition. The engineer indicated that no further communication has been received'.from the City of Excelsior regarding this matter and that it was clear that no additional work would be undertaken sinc~ the repair work has caused the system to function properly. Following discussion and review by the board in which the board 'noted that the city, as petitioner, had agreed to pay all costs of investigation up to $5,000 in the event the project was not ordered, it was moved by Andre. seconded by Carroll, that the petition be dismissed based on the fact that the repair work called for as a result of the initial engineering investigation had adequately restored the system and that no further improvement in the vicinity was warranted at the the present time; that the district bill the City of Excelsior for the district's costs of investigation in response to the petition with a credit against this amount equal to the sum allocated to the City for Galp~n Lake drainage repair work 'from the Water Maintenance ~ Repair Fund but not spent in Connection with the project. Upon vote the motion carried. Lake Zumbra/Sunny Lake Outlet Investigation The engineer distributed and reviewed w(th the board'a memorandum dated August 1, 1983, investigating and reviewing the existing outlet system for Lake Zumbra and Sunny Lake within the Carver Park Reserve owned by the Hennepin County Park Reserve District. The investigation was undertaken at the request of the Hennepin County Park Reserve District and authorized by the Board of Managers July 21, 1983. The engineer reviewed discharge hydrographs prepared as a part of his investigation and reviewed his conclusions with the managers. Following discussion and review, the board received the recommendations of the engineer and authorized that the memorandum and the conclusions be forwarded to the Hennepin County Park Reserve District and further that the Homeowners' Association on Sunny Lake also be provided with a copy of the engineer's conclusions. September 15, 1983 Page 17 Continuation of Regular Meeting There being no further business to come before the Board of Managers, Chairman Cochran, at 11:35 p.m., declared the meeting continued to 5:00 p.m. on September 29, 1983, at the Wayzata City Hall. Continuation Meeting The continuation of the regular meeting of September 15, 1983, was called to order by Chairman Cochran at 5:05 p.m. on September 29, 1983, at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota, pursuant to 'notice announced at the regular meeting of September 15, 1983, and mailed notice of September 19, 1983. Managers Present: Cochran, Lehman and Andre Managers Absent: Thomas and Carroll Staff: Panzer and Macomber Also present was Mayor Marvin Johnson, City of Independence. Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project/Painter Creek Subwatershed CP-5 Chairman Cochran stated that the purpose of the continuation meeting was to consider the record of the public hearing, including any comments received during the period provided by the board for re-opening of the record for written comments, to review the staff analysis submitted to the board dated ~eptember 28, 1983, to consider proposed findings of fact with respect to the project and to act either to order or not order the petitioned project. Chairman Cochran stated that copies of the staff memoranda, minutes of the public hearing of August 25, 1983, and proposed findings were available for any person wishing to review them. The managers first reviewed the minutes of the public hearing of August 25, 1983. Following review, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Cochran, that the minutes be approved with the addition on page 1, first paragraph, 5th line, to add the phrase "on Thursday, August 25, 1983." Upon vote the motion carried. September 15, 1983 Chairman Cochran then called for comments from any persons present at the meeting who wished to address the board .regarding the record of the project. None were noted. Chairman Cochran noted receipt of a memorandum from the engineer dated September 28, 1983, providing the staff's analysis of written comments and hearing testimony submitted regarding Painter Creek/CP-5. Chairman Cochran also noted receipt of a supplement to the engineer's report dated September 28, 1983. Chairman Cochran stated that copies of these two staff documents were available in the meeting room for any person wishing to review them. Chairman Cochran then called upon the engineer to review ~ staff analysis of written comments. The engineer summarized conclusions reached in his written memorandum: (a) The engineer recommended Zhat the improvements suggested by the Water Resources Board in its letter of June 29, 1983, are not practical in Lake Katrina, South Katrina Marsh or Painter Marsh and not be added to the project. (b) The engineer reviewed the elements of his report regarding the overall benefits of the project as those related to the comments submitted by the Metropolitan Council August 9, 1983. (c) The engineer reviewed the comments submitted by the Department of Natural Resources requesting"a fish migration barrier. The engineer explained..that he had met with the DNR personnel following the hearing to attempt to determine whether a fish migration barrier was necessary and, if so, what the design criteria for such a barrier would be. The engineer reviewed alternate designs and alternate locations. The engineer reported on the regults of his investigation. The engineer recommended that the engineering report be supplemented to add a fish migration barrier at Painter Creek Drive at Painter Creek. The engineer also noted that based on the size of the project, p~epara~ion of a mandatory environmental assessment worksheet is not required. The engineer then reviewed the public testimony that re.~uested additional responses from the engineer. September 15, 1983 Page 19 (a) With respect to the request of Mayor Marvin Johnson that additional channel maintenance be provided, the engineer recommended that this work not be included in the project because it is. not necessary to the functioning of project CP-5, would resUlt'in local benefits only, would not be appropriate for district-wide financing and could be undertaken under alternate funding mechanisms. (b) The engineer reviewed a letter from Gilman Sorenson dated September 20, 1983, requesting additional dredging of a defined waterway between Ingerson Road and Painter Creek. The engineer similarly recommended that it not be added to'the project 'for the above reasons. (c) The engineer reviewed written comments received from At)by and Glenn Rye dated September 9 and September 27, 1983. The engineer advised the board that no adverse environmental consequences of the project have been identified and that these are discussed at Appendix H of the engineer's report. The engineer also stated that it was the intent of the district to negotiate easement acquisition with affected property owners and to compensate such owners for any property rights necessary to construct and maintain the project. The engineer then reviewed his supplement to the engineering report'dated September 28, 1983. The engineer advised the board that the amended report recommended the addition of a project No. 7, a fish migration barrier, under Painter Creek Drive in the City of Minnetrista for the reasons set forth in the staff memorandum analyzing written comments. The engineer reviewed the preliminary design criteria provided by the DNR and the cost estimates contained in the supplement to the engineering report. The engineer then reviewed project costs. With the addition of the fish migration barrier, the engineer advised the managers that the total estimated construction cost was $239,936 (1982 dollars). The engineer then reviewed paragraph E on page 4 of the supplementary report. The engineer stated that the costs in line item 4 had been brought current through September 27, 1983, to incorporate all costs through the close of the hearing record. The managers reviewed the various methods of allocation of the costs incurred prior to the adoption of the Painter Creek Work Plan on December 11, 1980. · . J September 15, l~B3 Page 20 It was noted that the pre-Painter Creek Work Plan studies produced data useable and used in the Painter Creek Work Plan a_nd that it would be appropriate to include such costs as a part of the total project costs. Following discussion and review by the board, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, to accept the supplement to the engineer's report of September 28, 1983, adopting Method 1 as set forth on page 4 of the supplemental engineering report. Upon vote the motion carried. It was noted that transposition of numbers appeared in line item 6 on page 4 and that the figure "$239,963" should read "$239,936." It was then moved by Andre, seconded by Lehman, that on page 4 of the September 28, 1983, engineering report, line item 6 be amended to delete the figure "$239,963" .and insert in lieu thereof "$239,936," and that item 9, total estimated project costs, be reduced to reflect the adjustment in line item 6 and that, as amended, the supplement to the engineer's report dated September 28, 1983, be approved and accepted. Upon vote the motion carried. The board then reviewed proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order regarding the Painter Creek Project which Chairman Coch~an noted were available for review by the public. Following review of the Findings, Conclusions and proposed Order, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Andre, that the proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order as submitted to the board be amended to insert the figure "$239,936" in paragraph 65 of the Findings and paragraph 7 of the Conclusions .and to insert the figure "$487,085" in paragraph 67 of the Findings, paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Conclusions and paragraph 3 of the Order, and that, as amended, the Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order be approved and adopted by the board in the form attached to and hereby made a part of these minutes. Upon vote the motion carried. Continuation of Public Hearinq on 1984 Budqe~ Chairman Cochran then declared the public hearing on the district's 1984 budget to be re-opened at 5:45 p.m. Chairman Cochran stated that this public hearing on the budget was a continuation of the public hearing held at the September 15, 1983, meeting of the Board of Managers and that the purpose of the continuation was to consider a proposed budget for Painter Creek Project CP-5. Chairman Cochran stated that the September 15, 1983 Page 21 proposed budget for the project was contained in the engineer's report and that copies were available for review. The managers noted that the engineer's report dated October, 1982, revised May 3, 1983, expressed construction costs and easement acquisition costs in 1982 dollars and that for consistency, 1982 dollars had been carried over into the supplement of September 28, 1983. The managers also noted that the engineer had calculated an adjustment of the total estimated project cost to reflect 1984 costs for use in considering a tax levy resolution, but that the individual line item for construction and easement acquisition would also. require adjustment.to reflect these costs in 1984 dollars, because the actual tax levy would be made for the project and contracts would be let in 1984. Following discussion and review, it was moved by Andre, seconded by Cochran, that the following budget be adopted for Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project/Painter Creek Subwatershed CP-5, with individual line items shown below to be adjusted to reflect 1984 dollars, provided that the total estimated project cost of $487,085 (1984 dollars) shown below shall not change: UPPER WATERSHED STORAGE AND RETENTION PROJECT/ PAINTER CREEK SUBWATERSHED CP-5 PROJECT BUDGET Project No. 1 3 Project Name Lake Katrina Outlet Control Structure South Katrina Marsh Channel 24,535 Improvements South Katrina Outlet Control Structure Painter Marsh Channel Improvements 62,245 Painter Outlet Control Structure 27,616 Pond 937 Outlet Control Structure 20,430 Fish Migration Barrier 18,850 Cost $ 24,000 11,250 Sep=ember 15, 1983 Contingencies - 10% Engineering - 12% Legal and Administrative - 5% Costs of Upper watershed Study Prior to December. 11, 1983 18,893 22,671 9,446 51,087 Painter Creek Watershed Study Costs through September 27, 1983 59,963 Estimated Easement Acquisition Costs CP-5 (i982 Dollars) 89,050 Total Estimated Pro~ect Cost (1982 Dollars) $440,036 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (1984 Dollars) $487,085 Upon vote the motion carried. Following adoption of the foregoing budget for Project CP-5, manager Lehman moved the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Andre: RESOLUTION OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT LEVYING A TAX PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA 'STATUTES SECTION 112.61, SUBD. 3, FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE UPPER WATERSHED STORAGE AND RETENTION PROJECT 'PAINTER CREEK SUBWATERSHED CP-5 Manager Lehman offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Andre. WHEREAS, the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has authorized and ordered the undertaking of the Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project/Painter Creek Subwatershed CP-5, upon receipt of a petition and following notice and public hearings, all as required by law; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes ~!12.61, subd. 3, authorizes the District to levy a tax, in addition to the annual levy for the administrative fund of the District, to pay the costs of the basic water management features of improvement projects initiated by petition of a municipality; and September 15, 1983 Page 23 WHEREAS, all notices and hearings as required by law have been given and held; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that a mill rate sufficient to produce $487,085, but not to exceed one-third (1/3) of a mill, be levied upon all taxable property in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, No. 3, Hennepin and Carver Counties, State of Minnesota, for the year 1984 for the purpose of raising funds to be used by the managers to pay the costs of the Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project/Painter Creek Subwatershed CP-5 and that said levy shall be in addition to the annual administrative levy authorized by Minnesota Statutes ~112.61, subd. 3. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were 3 yeas and 0 nays as follows: ANDRE Yea CARROLL Absent COCHRAN Yea LEHMAN Yea THOMAS Absent The chairman declared the resolution adopted. Chairman Cochran then declared the public hearing on the district's 1984 budget closed at 5:55 p.m. Other CP-5 Matters Chairman Cochran called for discussion of additional items with respect to the Painter Creek Project. The engineer requested direction from the board as to the timetable for securing aerial photography of the project area. Alternatives were discussed by the board. Chairman Cochran called for any other business to be brought before the regular meeting of the Board of Managers. Noting none, Chairman Cochran declared the regular meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 0685o Albert L. Lehman, Acting Secretary LABOR MARKET CONDITIONS Vol. 7 No. l0 October 1983 Developments from a Month Ago In several respects, Twin Cities area labor force trends diverged from typical July to August changes in past years and from month to month patterns during 1983. Since the first quarter of 1983, economic growth has been gaining momentum while the labor forc6 was expanding at a much slower than usual rate due to extremely poor job market condi- tions. In the first seven months of 1983, the Twin Cities area labor force had in- creased by only 2.1 percent compared to an average of 3.3 percent over the past thir- teen'years. However, there was an upsurge in labor force expansion in August, caused possibly by rising expectations among discouraged workers of successfully finding a job now that the economy is improving. The number of employed individuals increased at a faster than average rate while the number of unemployed fell only slightly. Since Unemployment Insurance claims data shows a rather healthy decrease between July and August, it appears that larger numbers of new and reentrants to the labor force ay be starting to put additional pressure on the labor market. Nationally, the labor rce participation rate, the percentage of the working age population which is either working or looking for work, has risen from 64.0 percent in March to 64.7 in August. Consequently, while the economy is expected to continue to grow at a rate which will create demand for new jobs, the number of unemployed may not fall as rapidly as in re- cent months because of faster labor force expansion. LABOR FORCE tSli)~l[$ .. (not seasonally adjusted) AJ~EA CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE TOTAL EHPLOY)~ENT UNE)4PLOY~ENT UNEMPLOY)~Eh~ RATE AUG.p JULY- AUG.. AUG.p JULY~ AUG. AUG.~ JULYD AUG.n AUG.p JULY. AUG.R 1983' 1983~ 1982~ 1983- 1983" 1982R 1983~ 1983" 1982- 1983' 1983K 11982 Minneapolis- St. ~,ul S~SA* 1,185.1 1,170.9 1,164.6 1,109.4 1,094.9 l,O85.9 75.7 76.0 78.7 6.4 6.5 6.8 ~unty: ~k, 112,862 111,715 110,771 105,026 103,648 102,798. 7,836 8,O67 7,973 6.g 7.2 7.2 C~rver 20,961 20,727 20,876 lg,BSl 19,591 19,430 1,1lO 1,136 1,446 5.3 5.6 6.9 Chisa9o 14,693 14,597 14,507 13,761 13,600 13,488 912 997 1,019 6.2 6.8 7.0 Dakota 110,810 109,204 109,316 104,015 102,650 lOl,80B 6,795 6,554 7,508 6.1 6.0 6.9 Nenneptn 539,260 532,287 528,343 504,458 497,640 493,754 34,802 34,447 34,589 6.5 6.5 6.5 Ramsey 263,596 260,489 255,205 246,377 243,145 241,149 17,219 17,344 18,O56 6.5 6.7 7.0 Scott 24,775 24,671 25,)64 23,462 23,154 22,564 1,313 1,517 2,200 5.3 6.1 8.7 Washinst~n 64,412 63,701 63,449 60,857 60,059 59,566 3,555 3,642 3,883 5.5 5.7 6.1 Wright 33,783 33,526 32,560 31,594 31,181 .30,925 2,189 2,345 2,035 6.5 7.0 6.2 City of 213,569 210,418 209,259 158,775 196,166 194,558 14,794 14,250 14,701 6.9 6.8 7.0 Mtnneapoli[ City of 155,150 153,426 153,127 144,803 142,90~ 141,731 10,347 10,522 11,396 6.7 6.9 7.4 St. P~ul ~inne$ot~' 2,219.$ 2,205.7 2,195.2 2,059.0 2,040.8 2,025.6 160.5 164.9 173.6 7.2 7.5 7.5 United States* 113,578 113,980 111,887 103,167 103,273 101,177 lO,411 10,707 10,710 9.2 9.4 5.6 Preliminary LABOR MARKET CONDITIONS (Continued) Developments from a Year Ago Job market conditions have improved significantly when compared to August 1982. The unemployment rate is lower than a year ago in all metropolitan area counties except Wright, where it is higher, and Hennepin, where it is the same as last year. The num- ber of job openings received in August at Job Service offices of the Minnesota Depart- ment of Economic Security was up by 45 percent from a year ago. To .put this positive news into perspective, however, one must compare this year's figures to prerecession years in addition to last year when job market conditions were still deteriorating. Openings recei'ved this August were about 83 percent of the average number received in August Over the past eight years. In many occupational categories, this percentage was far less. For*example, the number of benchmark (assembly and repair) jobs re- ceived in August was only about one-fourth of the eight year average. Professional, clerical, and mach'ine trades jobs were between sixty and seventy percent of the eight year average. Service, transportation, packaging and material handling occupational job'openings were near or exceeded the eight year average. Perc~t Un~oy~nt R~%e$ Percent UnemD~oyed (Not Seasonally ~d3ulted) U~e~p~oyed 1982 19~3 Three Month Outlook The three month period between August and November is typically characterized by sea- sonal employment expansion in educational services and the retail trade sector. Un- employment tends to rise slightly while the unemployment rate is generally stable. Given the outlook for national economic growth, one would anticipate continued im- provement in the employment and unemployment picture, although at a more gradual pace than during the second and third quarters. CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSO)~S CLAIMING UNEMPLOY ,IENT INSURANCE 'number o~ unemployment insurance mants decreased by 1,342 from July. The' 7.7 percent monthly decrease com- pared favorably wi th a past five year average decrease of 4.2 percent. Almost half of the monthly decrease occurred in the durable goods manufacturing industry alone, especially in the nonelectrical machinery sector. Construction and trade also had large decreases from July, with 232 and 315 fewer claims, re- spectively. Compared to a year ago, claims in the regular program are' down by 14,276. While this represents a substantial de- crease, it must be noted that this August there were 'an additional 6,903 claimants in extended benefit programs. The comparable figure for August, 1982, was ll. The manufacturing and service industries accounted for almost two- thirds of the yearly decrease, wi th 5,934 and 2,675 fewer claims, respec- tively. Manufacturing sectors showing improvement were the primary and cated metals industries. Industry Occupational Attachn~nt MINNEAPDLIS-S~. PAUL ~5~ Week E~lng 8/13/83 Total, All Industries Construction Manufacturtn9 Durable Goods Nondurable Goods Trans., Comm., and Public Utilities Wholesale Trade Ret~tl lrade Fin., Ins., and Real Estate Se~tces Public Admin. All Other Inf. Not Available Percent Worn lotal, All Occupations Prof., TechJ, Mgr. Clerical Sales Service Farm., For., Fish. Processing P~chtne lrades Benchwork Structural Work ~iscellaneous Inf. Not Available Percent Change From: '. _ Percent Percent l/ I~onth I Year of Lomg-~erm~ Number Age/ Ago lotal Unemployed 15,998 -7.7 -47.2 100.0 27.7 1,304 -15.1 -$3.9 8.2 22.2 3,810 -14.9 -64.6 23.8 32.2 2,640 -18.3 -69.2 16.5 32.4 1,170 -6.1 -46.4 7.3 31.$ 986 -10.5 -3B.3: ' 6.2 26.8 1,416 -9.2 -40.3 8.9 36.6 2,578 -6.3 -24.6 16.1 31.4 733 -2.4 -32.4 4.6 33.2 4,594 O.5 -36.8 28.7 21.8 337 3.7 -25.' 2.1 17.8: 75 -1.3 -56.6 0.5 10.7 165 -13.2 -49.7 1.O 2.4 15,99B -7.7 -47.2 lO0.O 27.7 ~,170 -0.6 -38.2 26.1 26.2 2,929 -4.2 -36.4 18.3 31.7 875 -6.0 -31.7 5.5 32.9 1,536 -5.3 -33.7 g.6 26.8 60 9.1 -31.8 0.4 15.0 181 -33.5 -65.3 1.1 32.0 1,123: -15.9 -63.1 7.0 32.4 1,209 -12.5 -69.4 7.6 26.2 1,732' -15.5 -54.5 10.8 23.4 2,15~ -10.2 -43.6 13.4 25.2 33 -28.3 -66.~ 0.2 30.3 NOTE: Percentages mmy not total to lOO.O due to independent roungtn9. Iff Long-Term unemployed refers to unemployment tn~uran~e clat~mnts whose current spell of unemployment has lasted 15 weeks or longer. +3O0 +250 +200 *lB0 +100 12-Month Percent Change In "Blue-Collar" and "White-Collar' Unemployment InsuranCe Clai~nts, Hinneapolis-St. Paul S~A, 1980 - 1983 +60 0 -'SO EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS CONDITIONS Developments from Last Month After accounting for the effects of the labor dispute in the communication industry and the return to work of those on temporary layoff in the transportation equipment manufacturing industry, nonagricultural wage and salary employment in the Twin Cities area appears to have continued to show improvement in August. The manufacturing sec- tor showed stronger than average growth between July and August, even after the short- term auto worker layoff.is taken into consideration. Job increases were registered in all but two of the manufacturing industries but especially in the nonelectrical ma- chinery industry. The construction industry continued to add jobs in August, although the number of jobs in general contract construction remained unchanged. Trade jobs expanded more'rapidly than the average of the past thirteen years with the opening of the City Center in Minneapolis accounting for approximately 70 new retail shops and restaurants. In addition, there are several new service establishments located in t~e Center. Developments from a Year Ago For the first time since September 1981, total wage and salary employment in the Twin Cities area surpassed the comparable year ago figures. While the employment level was about 25,000 below what it was in August, 1981, the rate of recovery in employment over the past nine months since the recession ended nationally has been more rapid than comparable periods following the previous three recessions. Recovery has been much faster than in previous recessions in construction, manufacturing, and trade. In August, the number of construction jobs were above the year ago level for the first time since April, lg80; trade jobs surpassed the year ago level for the first time since October, 1981; and manufacturing jobs exceeded the year ago level for the first time' since December, 1981. Three-Month Outlook Nationally, indicators, show the economy growing in the third quarter at a slower rate than during the booming first half of 1983. I Howe~er, the recovery is still at a rate healthy enough to increase employment. The job outlook in the Twin Cities is expected to continue to improve between the third and fourth quarters. Manufacturing employ- ment is forecasted to remain stable or increase slightly. While construction employ- ment is expected to experience a smaller than usual seasonal drop, higher interest rates may have already curtailed new building activity for the rest of 1983. The out-. look is for faster than average growth in trade, services~ and transportation, commu- nication, and public utilities. Government employment is expected to increase slight- ly faster than its usual seasonal upswing. in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area PERCENl PRbL)UK,110N gDRKr.~.S' HOUPS &EARNINGS~/ EMPLOYMENT )NDUS1RY (O00) F~M Avereq~ Ueekly~ Average Hourly Average Weekly m AUGUS)~ ~nth Yeor ~onth Year AUGUSl ~nth AUGUST ~nth AUGUST ~nth 'J 1064.6 1062.O ~057.4 0.2 0.7 XX XX XX TOIAL ~AGRI CULTURAL XX XX XX r~t~UFACTURlt:G 234.3' 230.2 2~.1~ ~.B 0.1 403.35 398.73 10.16 10.12 39.7 39.~ ~rahle Goods 148.8 1~5.8 )48.8 2.1 0.0 (10.86 403.97 10.07 9.g5 40.B Eumber & Wried Products 5.1 5.0 (.7 1.6 6.6 499.21 437.20 11.32 10.93 44.1 40.0 ru~-niture R Fixtures 1.5 1.S 1.6 0.O -2.5 330.99 321.41 8.85 B.37 37.4 38.4 Stone, Cl~y R K, ldss 3.3 3.2 3.2 2.4 2.3 ~3gl,30 399.60 lO.19 10.22 38.4 39.1 ~'rimary ~'etals 3.9 3.8 3.9 2.7 0.1 334.07 331.47 8.61 8.70 38.8 )ahricate.', hYtals 26.3 26.1 26.3 0.7 -0.3 475.~5 469.42 ll.2a 11.15 42.3 !lon-Elrctricml P. achincr.y 60.8 Sg.5 59.3 2.1 2.5 394.02 392,63 9.95 g. BA 39.6 39.5 Flectric*l t~chinc,'y 17.6 17.7 18.3 -0.6 -4.2 384.22 391.62 9.1l 9.15 41.9 4~.8 lrenspnrtRtion Equ~nt 3.~ 2.0 3.5 66.2 -4.1 ~52.13 472.63 12.52 11.28 44.1 41.9 ('thor Dureblesl/ 27.0 26.9 27,8 0.3 -2.9 378.42 377.74) 9.39 9.42 40.3 'Nondurable Gonds 85.5 ~.~ 85.3 1.2 0.2 3gl.13 3gl.?0 10.32 10.3g 37.9 37.7 Fo,d L Kindred Product~ 18.7 1B.a 18.( 1.6 0.4 361.00 371.6~ 9.50 9'.78 38.0 38.0 i~xtt)~s & Apparel 2.4 2.3 2.6 4.8 -5.7 224.26 216.94 5.84 5.96 38.4 36.4 r~;,cr & Allied Pro,.etS 24.4 24.1 24.1 1.O O.g 437.86 430.60 10.~5 10.42 41.g 41.g nrintir, g ~, Publishing 24.1 24.2 24.7 -O.1 -2.3 314.41 366.89 ll.2l ~1.22 33,4 32.7 (heroical Products 6.3 6.3 6.3 -0.2 0.2 434.21 433.13 ll.61 11.55 31.4 3).5 Petroleum Products 1.8 1.B 1.l 2.7 7,3 508.14 518.28 12.20 12.~ 41.7 42.0 ilubbeF & Leather Product~ 1.1 7.3 7.3 5.3 6.1 355.26 351.89 9.30 9.32 ~.2 38.~ t¢O~IM,~t~UFACIU~ING 8~.3 831.8 823.2 -0.2 O.B XX XX XX XX XX XX C(~tiSTRUCI 1C,~4 40.9 39.3 39.( 4.0 2.7 611.g8 62~.86 16.19 16.23 3?.8 38.5 guildinS Construction 10.9) 10.9 lO.i -0.1 2.1 583.6? 595.03 15.69 1S.?D 3T.2 37.9 High~ay & Heavy Construction 5.9 5.5 5. 1.2 8.2 600.18 587.98 1~.29 13.17 ,2.0 Special lrades Contracting 24.1 22.9 23. 5.2 1.6 627.36 ~6.38 16.gl ll.10 31.1 t~'.~t~SP~lAl I ON 37 .TI )l.l 38.~ 0,0 -1 .B XX XX XX XX XX XX lruCl'in~ & Warehousing 13.1' 12.9 13.7 1,g -4.0 431.88 433.46 12.20 l~.21 35.( 35.5 PUBLIC UTILIII[S & C~. 15.3 20.3 20.g -24,3 -26.5 508.93 487.21 12.66 12.37 40.2 40.~ TRAOE 265.B 263.4 262.4 0.9 ).3. 231.12 Z37.B( 1.80 7.85 30.4 30.3 ~etail Trade 190.5 188.4 l~.0 1.~ 1.4 183.37 181.6( 6.62 6.63 27.7 27.4 General ~rchandiso Stores 30.) 30.1 30.5 1.9 0.6 183.9Z 116.9~ 6.09 6.08 30.2 29.1 F~d Stores 25.1 25.1 24.B 1.1 1.3 239.38 239.3~ 8.17 8.14 2g.3 29.4 Eating & Drinking Places 63.5 62.6 63.l 1.4 -0.3 81.?D Bl.?) 4.30 ~.~B 19.D 19.1 ~holesale l~ade 75.3 75,0 74.4 0.4 1.2 403.13 409.2~ 10.3g 10.aa 38.8 39.2 FINANCE, 1NS. & REAL ESIAT[ 73.B 73.6 )3.] O.3 0.2 Finance 31 .~ 31.6 30.~ O.1 2.8 Insurance 29.2 ~g.2 29.~ 0.1 -1.1 Real Estate 13.O 12.B 13.~ 1.O SERV1CE & ~ISCELL~[Ot~ ~54.6 252.~ 2~8.~ O.g 2.5 Business & Personal Services 60.) 60.0 59.! 0.9 0.9 Repair Services 1~.4 12.3 ll.~ 1.2 4.8 ~eUicel Services 7~.7 7~.6 72.~ 0.2 3.2 Hospitals 30.8 3D.B 30.( 0.O 0.6 t;ursing Ho~s 20.0 20.0 lg.( -O.l O.B GOVEP~ENT 142.1 145.1 13g.( -2.1 1.6 Federal 17.1 l~.0 17.! 0.6 -4.0 State 40.7) 40.9 ~0.( -0.4 Local 8~.2! 87.2 82.( -3.3 2.7 " Le~s th~n .OS ~/ Includes Scientific Instrunents and Miscellaneous Kanufacturing _2/ Averaoe ?rninqs data are on a "eress" basis and are derived from reports of payroll for full- and pert-time ProduCtion or nonsurervisery workers. The payroll is reported before deductior~s of any kind. Bonuses, retro- active )ay, tips, pa)~:nt in kind, and "fringe benefits" are excluded. Source: Currer. t [n~l(?n~,.r,t ,~tatistics ~'rogram (Fi~_ure~ rounded to nearest hundred) The Job Market The medical services industry has displayed rapid growth in the past decade and is expected.to continue to grow in the future. This brief article will attempt to give some historical employment trends,' compare staffing requirements in the various types of health care facilities, and discuss some of the trends which are likely to have a significant impact on the rate of employment growth in the medical services industry in the future. As the graph below shows, total health services employment in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area showed steady growth from 1972 to 1981 when it began to level off. Factors which were responsible for the growth were greater health consciousness by the general public, rising incomes, and increased insurance coverage. When the health services industry is dissected into three major components, one can see definite dif- ferences in employment trends between hospital and nursing homes, which are inpatient facilities, and other medical services including outpatient facilities, such as HMO clinics, medical and dental laboratories, and offices of physicians, dentists, and health practitioners. Emp 1 oymen t {Thousands 80 7O 4O 30 2O lO Trends in Private Hedical Services Employment, Iqinneapolis-St. Paul SMSA 1972 - 1983 Total Private Health Services Hospitals Other Health Services /__ ----~Nursing Homes 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 Employment in private hospitals has increased by 28.3 percent between 1972 and 1983. Employment has stabilized at about 31,000 over the past three years. As the length of stay and number of patient days in hospitals has dropped, a surplus of beds has devel- oped and hospitals have merged, closed, or changed the nature of their services. The severe 1981-82 recession has also impacted on the demand for health care as some peo- ple have had to postpone health care because of the loss of a job and health insurance coverage. Employment in nursing homes and other medical services has increased by over 95 percent since 1972. The employment trend in nursing homes has mirrored that of hospitals while employment in other medical services has showed steady growth since the mid-1970's. The following table shoves staffin9 patterns by major occupational groups in the three types of medical services. Percent Distribution of Occupational Employment In the Medical Services lndustry in ~innesota Hursing Other Hospitals Homes Medical Services lotal, All Occupations lO0.O ~ lO0.O Manaoers 3.2 4.5 4.4 ProfessiOn'al 31.1 10.9 25.9 lechnical 18.5 9.4 29.6 Service 30.5 66.1 ?.4 Maintenance & Production 3.g 5.2 3.7 Clerical 12.B 3.9 28.9 Sales 0.0 0.0 0.1 Source: Occupational Employment Statistics Program, Research Office, Minnesota Department of Economic Security. Detailed occupational employment estimates in the medical services i~dustry are avail- able in the 1980 and 1981 Occupational Employment Statistics publications. significant trends are likely to have a major impact on the demand for health care ervices in the future. The first is demographic while the second is financial in nature. The demand for medical'services is expected to increase in the future because of the increasing number of older people who generally require medical services more frequently. According to projections made by the State iDemographer's Office, the total population of the seven county Minneapolis-St. Paul area is expected to increase by 12.4 percent between 1980 and 2000. The population of the 75 years and oldet is projected to increase by46.9 percent in the same 20 year period. A second significant trend underway already is controlling the cost of health care. Controlling the rising cost of inpatient care through developing alternative outpa- tient services has already had an impact on employment as was demonstrated in the graph. Home health care services are an alternative to nursing homes for many elder- ly people. A second example is the shifting of diagnostic tests and simple surgery from hospitals to outpatient clinics. Phased changes in the Medicare payment system over the next four years are expected to have a significant impact on the way hospi- tals operate in the future. There is likely to be more specialization by hospitals, more sharing of expensive equipment, and greater incentive to reduce surplus beds in order for hospitals to minimize their costs. In general, these trends point to a more streamlined system of inpatient care with employment growth in outpatient medical services. INCOME AND PRICE CONDITIONS ~ P~tes of Compensation Change in the ~ployment Cost'~ndex1-/ Percent changes for Series 3 m~nths ended 12 ~. ended 3UIiE SEPT. DEC' hlAR. JUNE JUNE JUNE lgB2 1982 lgB2 lg83 lg83 1982 lg83 All private nonfar~ workers2-/ 1.3 2.0 1.3 1.7 1.2 7.2 6.3 White-collar workers 1.3 2.1 1.2 1.8 1.2 7.2 6.5 Blue-collar workers 1.3 1.g 1.2 1.6 1.2 7.0 6.1 Service workers 1.1 1.6 2.0 1.B 0.7 7.9 6.2 Manufacturing industries 1.1 2.0 l.O 1.9 0.9 7.2 i 5.9 Nonmahufacturtng industries 1.3 2.1 1,4 1.6 1.4 7.1 . 6.6 l_/ The ECI is a quarterly ~asure of changes in wage and salary rates, defined as straight-time average hourly earnings, and employer costs for e~nployee benefits. ~/ Excludes private household workers. Compensation cost increases for private industry (1.2 percent) and State and local government workers (0.5 percent) in the March-June period this year were similar to last Year. A comparison of compensation cost changes for the 12-month period ending June 1983 with a 12-month period ending June 1982 shows a significant slowdown. Com- pensation cost increases dropped more for State and local government workers (7.1 per- cent from.9.3 percent last year) than for private industry workers (6.3 percent from 7.2 pencent). The drop in compensation~cost increases for-State and local government workers occurred in both the wage and benefit cost components. For private industry workers, the slowdown was caused only by dampened wage and salary increases. Percent Change in Major Group Con~onents of the Consumer Price Index* August 1982 - August lg83 Minneapolis-St. Paul U.S. City Group SMSA Average All Items -1.5 2.4 Food and Beverages 2.2 1.7 Housing -7.1 1.2 Apparel and Upkeep 0.0 2.9 Transportation 1.9 2.0 Medical Care ll.8 8.0 Entertainment 6.7 3.9 Other ll.3 12.6 *Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W}. 8 BILLS ..... NOVEMBER 1, 1983 Air Comm A & K Construction Earl F. Andersen Autocon Industries Acro-MN Holly Bostrom Jan Bertrand Bradley Exterminating Butler Paper Burlington Northern Continental Telephone Cash Register Sales Dependable Services. Director of Property Taxes Donaghue Doors Jon Elam Floyd Security Fire Control Extinguisher First Bank Mpls Farmers Steel Forensic Engineers Gopher Sign Co. Henn Co. Chiefs Police Henn County Hayden Murphy Equip Robert E. Johnson Illies& Sons Johnson Service KIs Mechanical & Excav Lowells Auto Sharon Legg Minnegasco Mound Super Valu MN Co. Attorney Assn Metro Fone Miller Davis · Mound Medical Clinic McCombs Knutson Natl Business Furniture Power Group Trust Popham Haik Pitney Bowes Credit Real One Acquisition Reo Raj Kennels Suburban Tires Stevens Well Co. Smith Heating Stewart Warner Co. T & T Maintenance Twin City Testing Thrifty Snyder Drug 100.00 16,788.O2 38.63 145.80 245.08 248.00 44.99 38.0O 368.68 533.33 1,568.91 34.10 33.00 268.12 79.00 40.09 4o5.5o 10.00 4.00 84.95 540.O0 18.27 305.00 870.30 17.00 10.12 1,115.00 55.00 1,400.00 97.83 13.00 3.0o 8.76 77.29 23.60 24.90 180.00 2,716.OO 280.19 73.29 1,4OO.00 26.00 1,188.44 97.O0 805.90 32.50 37.50 46.69 37.75 42O.O0 87.97 Vandoren-Hazard wi dmer Bros Winner Industries Water Products Commissioner of Revenue Director of Prop Tax II II II Falls & Nyhusmoen Griggs, Cooper Johnson Bros. Liq. Labor Relations Assoc City of Mound City of Mound City of Mound Mound Postmaster MN State Documents Mound Postmaster City of Mound Old Peoria Ed Phillips Jon Scherven State Treasurer R. L. Youngdahl TOTAL BILLS 4,085.00 174.00 4.61 553.80 6,138.62 29,629:23 178.87 4,654. OO 2,331.08 3,O41.21 97. OO 38.O1 77.24 20.00 6OO.OO 124.50 120.OO 8.26 1,325.20 1,717.97 59.00 1,416.71 5,723.00 95,203.81 f ~ · /,~ , ~ ~..- . --:.;-~ .---=-;-:. ~...,, ~00 Metro Square Bldg., St. Paul, MN 55101 ' A Metropolitan Council Bulletin for Community kead~/~h~:~..~} 4 F, For more i~[ormotion on items in this publication; ~I~ .... ,~ ut ~~. ~- ' October 14, 1983 RECENT COUNCIL ACTIONS (SepL 26~ct. 14) Older People-The Metropolitan Council accepted a plan that calls for providing more choices for the Area's older people in the type and location of housing and services. The plan also calls for supporting "informal" sources of help such as families and friends who provide most services to older people· The Council will use the plan for policy direction in issues of health, housing and aging and in its review of grant applica- tions for housing and related health and social services for older persons. Metrodome-The Council set the Minneapolis hotel-motel liquor tax requirement at $2.2 million for 1984, to help ser- vice the debt on SB5 million in bonds sold to build the Metro- dome. Minneapolis will translate the requirement into a two percent tax on lodging and on-sale liquor, a reduction from the three percent tax currently in effect. Cable TV-The Council decided to apply to the Minnesota Cable Communications Board for designation as the agency to ersee a regional cable channel. The Council's application for appointment of a regional board to manage and oper- ate the channel under policy direction from the Council, and ensures access to the channel by a variety of groups and organizations. Economic Development--Council Chair Gerald Isaacs decided to postpone work on an economic development program he had proposed for the Metropolitan Council, partly because of resistance from some smaller cities in the Region. Under the program, the CoUncil would have issued industrial revenue bonds and set up a federal "503" program for real e~tate loans to small businesses in cities outside Minneapolis and St. Paul. However, the Council will continue to develop its economic policies (see public hearing informa- tion below). Health--The Council approved revisions to a certificate~f- need proposal from Health Resources, Inc. and St. John's Hospital to build a 130-bed general acute hospital in Maple- wood. The revisions require the hospital to complete its relocation by December 1993 and to apply for a new certifi- cate of need when the hospital wants a second CT scanner, a computer-assisted x-ray machine. Housing-The Council said that a request for $7.6 million in federal moFtgage insurance to build a 189-unit apartment complex at Lexington Ay. and Wagon Wheel Rd. in Mendota Heights is consistent with Council policies. The Council r.,commended federal approval, provided that: Mendota Heights amend its comprehensive plan to show sewer service will be available to the apartments; prospective tenants receive 'nformation about anticipated aircraft noise; and the apart- ants be built to limit interior noise from aircraft. Transportation-~'he COuncil approved the Transportation Advisory Board's allocation of Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds to complete the following projects: - Reconstruction in 1984 of Washington Av. S. from 5th Ay. to Interstate Hwy. 3BW (SI.3 million}; - Widening of roadways on Penn Av. and 66th Sts. in 1984 (S537,000); - Widening of University Ay. from Egret Blvd. to Hwy. 12 in 1985 ($409,000); -- Continuation and expansion of Minnesota Rideshare in 1983 ($150,000); and - Rehabilitation of Metropolitan Transit Commission buses in 1984 ($1.1 million). The Council also deleted The FAU lundin9 share of the reconstruction of the intersection of Hwy. 13 and the Mendota Bridge in Dakota County due to insufficient funds from other sources. The action will not jeopardize the project's future funding. Parks-The Council amended a development grant contract with Carver County for Lake Minnewashta Regional Park, adding $141 BOO for a new total of $249,000. Projects include completing a swimming beach and building an additional picnic area, hiking and ski-tour trails and a second boat launch. Comprehensive Plans--The Council said the comprehensive plan of Shorewood, He'nnepin County, is consistent with regional plans for growth and development. PUBLIC HEARINGS, PUBLIC MEETINGS Hertn~"pin County Solid-Wast~ Sites--The Council will hold two public meetings to discuss three potential solid-waste land- fill sites in Hennepin £ounty. The meetings are as follows: -- Maple Grove Candidate Site--Oct. 24, 7 p.m., Oss~o Senior High School, 317 2nd Ay. NW.. O$$eo. -- T~o Candidate Sites in Eden Prairie--Oct. 26, 7 p.m., Eden Prairie High School auditorium, 17385 Valley View Rd,, Eden Prairie. To speak at one of the meetings, call Shirlee Smith, Planning Assistance, at 291-6421. Anoka Airport--The Council will hold a public meeting at 7 p.m. Nov. 1 at Westwood Junior High, 711 91st Ay., Blaine, to hear comments on a master plan for the Anoka airport. issues' include the ~ype of deveiopment compa'dble with -- ''minor'' airport, includin9 such things as instrument landing systems, an air-traffic control t~wer and other developments. For copies of a Metropolitan Council draft review, cell the Communications Department at 291-6464. Computer Crime-The Council will hold two public meet- ings to discuss ways to determine the scope of computer crime and how to prevent and detect it. The Council will seek com- ments on recommendations in a report, Confronting Computer Crime: A Cha/lenge for [he I980s. The first meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Nov. 3 at 3:30 p.m., and the second will be at the Northwestern National Life Insurance Bldg., 20 Washington Ay. S., Mpls., Nov. 17 at 7 p.m. For a copy of the report, No. 36~3-119, call the Communi- cations Department at 291-6464. To speak at the meeting, call Shirlee Smith. Planning Assistance, at 291-6421. For infor- matior, about the report, call Donna Mattson, planner, at 291-6493. Economic Policies-The Metropolitan Council will hold a public hearing Nov. 16 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers to receive comments on proposed interim economic policies for the Region. The policies are intended to ensure the Council and other governmental units give appropriate consideration to economic needs in its regional planning decisions. To speak at the hearing, call Shirlee Smith, Planning Assistance, at 291-6421. For information about the policies, call William Byers, planner, at 291-6322. t GOV. PERPICH REPLACES A-95 REVIEW President Reagan abolished the federal A-95 review process but invited governors to replace it with review systems of their own. In September, Gov. Perpich assigned the Metropolitan Council to continue its review for the Seven~,ounty Area of applications for federal grants and loans. The number of federal funding programs subject to Council review has been greatly reduced. A list of the 87 programs will be published over the next few issues of the Review and can be obtained by calling the Communications Department at 291-6464. MINNESOTA RACING COMMISSION Over the next few months, the Council will be helping the Minnesota Racing Commission in the commission's selection of a racetrack site in the Metropolitan Area. The next two commission meetings will be held on OCT. 26 and Nov. 9, both at the United Labor Center, Room 216,312 Central Ay., Minneapolis. Look for a listing of future commission meetings in the "Coming Meetings" section of the Review. COUNCIL OFFERS AFFORDABLE HOUSING EDUCATION PROGRAM Where will our children live7 This is the theme of'a Metropolitan Council affordable housing education program offered upon request to local civic groups. The 45-minute program examines today's housing market and the need to provide affordable housing. Information kits and booklets provide information on a variety of housing issues. For more information, call Council housing planners Guy Paterson or Aha Stern at 291-6472. NEW PUBLICATIONS 8argo Flee~ing: Potential/rnpa~s on Park/and. Aug. 1983. Report says fleeting, or parking, of river barges can adversely affect park areas. Ways to avoid such impacts include visual screening of fleeting operations and avoiding park develop- ment near fleeting areas. Recommends more research on affected areas of Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix Rivers. No. 02~34342; 164 pp.; $9.50. Prescription for Change: Balancing Competitive, Community and Regulatory Forces in Twin Cities Health Care, final report. Sept. 1983. Says increasing price competition in health care may help control escalating costs of ~are. Says a mix of competition, community initiatives and public regulation needed tc protect consumers and monitor health care system. No. 18-83~374; 40 pp.; S1.75. Values and Traditions of The Metropolitan Council. Sept. 1983. Transcript of a June 24, 1983, orientation program for new Metropolitan Council members. Contains comments of Arthur Naftalin, professor at University of Minnesota's Hubert Humphrey Institute, Council Member Joan Campbell and for. mar Council Chair James Hetland. No. 08~3-108; 20 pp.; no charge. Metropolitan Council Act, update. Sept. 1983. Incorpor- ates amendments psssed by 1983 Legislature. No. 08-83-119; 45 pp.; no charge. Surface Water Msnagernen~ P/anning Guide. Sept. 1983. Guide is intended to aid planners and local officials prepare plans requi,'ed by the 1982 Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act. No. 10-83-115; 33 pp.; no charge. 1983 Report of Reasonable Further Progres~ Toward Meeting Air Ouafity Standards During 1982 in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. July 1983. Ozcne levels didn't violate any standards in 1982. St. Paul's Shelling-University Ay. inter- section remained the Region's only carbon monoxide "hot spot." No. 10q~3~)42; 11 pp;; no charge. TRAINING FOR PUBLIC SECTOR SUPERVISORS The Government Training Service (GTS) will sponsor three management training workshops for public sector supervisors at the Holiday Inn-Capitol, St. Paul. Topics covered during the five days include leadership, communications, time manage- men's, employee performance reviews and delegation. Workshops ar~ as follows: - Oct. 24, 25: Basic Skills of Management - Nov. 10: Using Management Skills Within Your Organization -- Dec. 6, 7: Applying lVlanegement Skills to the Management of People For more information including costs, call Vic~i Det'twiler, GTS, at 222-7409. COMING MEETINGS (Oct. 24 - Nov. 4) (Information be/ow is Tentative. To verify, ca//291-6464.J Special Committee on Economic Development-Monday, OCT. 24, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Program Development and .Review Commit'tee-Monday, Oct. 24, 5 p.m., Conference Room E. Management Committee-Tuesday, Oct. 25, 1 p.m., Conference Room E. Special Committee on Resource Management-Tuesday, Oct. 25, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Senior Center/Access Services Subcommittee- Wednesday, Oct. 26, 12:30-~ p.m., Blaine Senior Center~ 9150 Central Ay. NE., Blaine. Committee on Metropolitan Commissions--Wednesday, Oct. 26, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Metropolitan Health Planning Board-Wednesday, Oct. 26, 4' p.m., Council Chambers. M&tropolitan Community and Devetopmen.t Commit'tee-- Thursday, Oct. 27, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. Metropolitan Council--Thursday, Oct. 27, 4 p.m., Council Chambers. Advisory Committee on Aging-- Friday, Oct. 28, 9 a.m., Council Chambers. Special Committee on Economic Development--Monday, Oct. 31, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Program Development and Review Committee-Monday, Oct. 31, 5 p.m., Conference Room E. Management Commit'me-Tuesday, Nov. 1,1 p.m., Conference Room E. University Av./Southwest Corridor Study Steering Commit'me-Tuesday, Nov. 1,3 p.m., Council Chambers. Technical Advisory Committee-Wednesday, Nov. 2, 9 a.m, Council Chambers. Metropolitan Waste Management Advisory Commit'tee- Wednesday, Nov. 2, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. Commit'tee on Metropolitan Commissions--Wednesday, Nov. 2, 3 p.m., Conference Room E. Chairman's Advisory Commi~ee-Wednesday0 Nov. 2, 7:30 p.m., Ccuncil Chambers. Metropolitan and Community/ Development Committal Thursdav, Nov. 3, 2 p.m., Council Chambers. Criminal Justice Advisory Commit'tee-Friday, Nov. 4, noon, Council Chambers. STERN; LEYINE,,SCHW~RTZ, LIFBQN, MINNEAPOLIS. M~NNESOTA · ieIz) O~tober 13, 1983 Mr. Larry Aldrich Dovf-Sat Czrrrrunieationm 2~6~ Pied'nont Rd. N.E., Ste. 220 Atlanta, C4, 303~5 Dear Mr. Aldrich: Please find belc~v a delineation of the cable television expenses for the city of Mound. ?'nese exuenses are the basis for your acceptance fee for the city of Motmd cable television franchise. Please make your check in the amount of S12,600.99.payable to the city of Mound and rmil to.Mu'. John El~'n of the city of Mound. If.you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 1982 1983 Professional Service Stern, Levine, et. al. $4,491.33 $9,136.84 '$13,628.17 r)unklev &Fhennett 714.28 714.28 Of¢iee Supplies 3.66 3.66 Copv Hachine 226.58 226.58 Postage 1.97 9.39 11.36 TeleDhone 3.94 3.94 Legal Publication 21.62 159.97 181.59 Meetin~Expense .100.46 375.95 476.4~ .Cit~ Staff Salary 1,000.00 '1,000.00 2,000'.00 Administrative Rtaff Salary 500.00 500.00 1~000.00 TOT.4_L -' $18,245.99 Less Lakeland Reirrbursement: LessDowflenDeposit ST~, T~'VINE, LI,C~S('N, C1REI(~ & BLITIN, (645.00) (5~000.o0) $12r600'99 ~.~. . ce: Jon Elwn STERN. LEVINE. SCHWARTZ.. - LIFSON, CREIGHTON & BUNIN, P.A. sT. LOU,S ~AnK. US ~,= October 26 83 {/~or.~ CI~ 0F MOUND ' ' ) $~600.99 j , lwe~vi Thousand 5~x ~und~ed and 99/100 ........................................... DOLORS ".-.~.~ ~~ V, // v '// . --lC',,,,.- · PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. 83-257 RESOLUTION NO. 83- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE FINAL SUBDIVISION FOR LOT 14, BLOCK 11, THE HIGHLANDS, RID 23-117-24 .31 0027 WHEREAS, the final subdivision of Lot 14, Block 11, The Highlands, PI'D # 23-117-24 31 0027, has been submitted in the manner required for subdivision of land under the City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 22.00 and under Chapter 462 bf the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder, and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a waiver of the subdivision requirements con- tained in Section 22.00 of the City Code, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommends approval- subject to conditions, and WHEREAS, it is hereby determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property such that the strict application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land; that the waiver is neces- sary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: Ao That the request of William and Muriel Stewart and Joe and Joanne Gibson for the waiver from the provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code and request to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as PID 23-117-24 31 0027, Lot 14, Block ll,'The Highlands, is hereby granted to permit division of the property in the following manner: North Parcel: South Parcel: Co Upon the further condition that, when the two parcels are divided, such parcels be added to, and combined with the adjacent parcel of land. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this resolution to the above named owners and subdividers after com- pletion of requirements, for their use as required by M.S.A. 462.358. This final subdivision shall be filed and recorded within 180 days of the date of the adoption of this resolution in the Office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City. Case #83~259 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE A NONCONFORMING SETBACK AND NONCONFORMING LOT FOR LOT 89, PHELPS ISLAND PaRk !St DIVISION PID #19-117-23 24 0024 WHEREAS, Jack Wang, the owner of property described as Lot 89, Phelps Island Park First Division; also that portion of a strip of land lying between the northerly line of said Lot 89, Phelps Island Park, First Division and Black Lake and between the westerly and easterly lines of said Lot 89 extended northerly to said Lake. Also, a strip of land 20 feet in width of Lot 98, Phelps Island Park, First Division lying westerly of and adjacent to a line drawn parallel with and 5 feet distant westerly from the Easterly line of said Lot 98 and extending from the Northerly boundary of said Lot 98 Southerly to the Southerly boundary line thereof( NOTE: the property des6ription is in question?)'PID#19-117-23 24 0024) has applied for a variance to allow for the construction of a 10 X 22 foot carport addition to an existing detached garage with a setback to the west lot line of 5 foot; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires two 6 foot side yards in the R-2 Zoning District and a lot r~quires frontage on an improved public right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota does hereby approve the one (1) foot variance as requested upon the condition that Mr. Jack Wang and all fee owners grant an easement for road purposes over the above described property, PID #19-117-23 24 0024, known as 4408 Denbigh Road, such easement to be described by the City Engineer. October 18, 1983 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473.-4224 Mr. Jan Elam, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55%4 Re: 1983 Water System Improvements Booster Pump Station Deor Jan: Enclosed herewith please find two (2) copies of Pay Estimate No. 2 as submitted by A & IK Construction, Inc. for work performed on the above referenced project. This estimate has been checked, appears to be in order, and is being forwarded to you for your approval and subsequent payment by the City of Mound. Sincerely, EUGENE A' HICKOK ANO ASSOCIATES George W. Bayer, ~. bt cc: John Aderman, A & I< Construction, Inc. STATUS OF CONTIL CT Original Contract Amoun ~t._ti~O, oo :- Extras approved to date iil..'Credits approved to date ___ ':Net amount of Contract this da.tJ · · ~.:'?":'-')' ':.-': '"'::~.'~'./~: ". :i~'. ',' .it~rtificate of the Contractor or his duly Authorized Reprm~nt~tlve .'."..-;'~:, [-.-:7~',v.'-.~: .i .' ": ,.¢ . . : :;..:,:T~ the ~t of my knowledge ...~.~e,f~ce of' Shee~ No. ?:,~O~e~d ~tefi, ls mpPlied in full ../.~'t~t.d~n~ ~tw~'cn '~ O~ ~O~d. ~neso~ , (~er) j:~ ch~ ~to; '~at the following is a '~e ~nd corot stat~ent of ~e contract ~count up ~, ~d ~u~, ~e lut- 'of'the~'.'~ covered' by ~ ~a~, ~d ~at no part of ~e "~o~t due" h~ ~n ~v~. ,:-'~.?' F ~ .~ ..." :' ~.~.:.: ~ .. ' ., .. . ~". ~.:-.g,. :. . ....'. :. ;, , :'....~ ..... ,, ~-...-, :,~,:~ ..:... . . .... · . · _'::~"~' .. ..;.~(::.: .... D~t~ October 6: ~ 923 . . . · :.-:(::-: .~::[~'.'-".. ..:~..... . . -.. :k'(al:' Total ~ount ~m~d. ................................................... ~ 26,2~ ~ ~ . ~..~(:., ¢;'.~-..~ _'[:..-)'.... . . - . - . . . . '~.;~(~' .,Tgt~l-.'~'ed '1~ m'~ned ~enmge ..... ,,..: .' .......................... $ 24,97.6.83 , ?'lie) ~0unt· due ~is estate.'. :.;.?.:...~ :.:. ~.: ..~.:;.... ~ _~.-~/ Appoved ~ to quant~es ar~ estimate due: Superintendent of Construction Architect Supervising Engineer Air Comm A & K Construction Earl F. Andersen Autocon Industries Acro-MN Holly Bostrom Jan Bertrand Bradley Exterminating Butler Paper Burl ington Northern Continental Telephone Cash Register Sales Dependable Services Director of Property Taxes Donaghue Doors don Elam Floyd Security Fire Control Extinguisher First Bank Mpls Farmers Steel Forensic Engiheers Gopher Sign Co. Henn Co. Chiefs Police Henn County Hayden Murphy Equip Robert E. Johnson Illies& Sons Johnson Service K's Mechanical & Excav Lowells Auto Sharon Legg Minnegasco Mound Super Valu MN Co. Attorney Assn Metro Fone Miller Davis Mound Medical Clinic McCombs Knutson Natl Business Furniture Power Group Trust Popham Haik Pitney Bowes Credit Real One Acquisition Reo Raj Kennels Suburban Tires Stevens Well Co. Smith Heating Stewart Warner Co. T & T Maintenance Twin City Testing Thrifty Snyder Drug 100.00 16,788.02 38.63 145.80 245.08 248.00 38.00 368.68 533.33 1,568.91 34.10 33.00 268.12 79.00 40.09 4o5.5o 10.OO 4.OO 84.95 54o.oo 18.27 305. OO 87O.3O 17.oo 10.12 1,115.00 55.00 1,400.00 97.83 13.OO 3.00 8.76 77.29 23.60 24.90 180. O0 2,716.00 280.19 73.29 1,4OO.OO 26.00 1,188.44 97.00 805.90 32.50 37.5O 46.69 37.75 420.00 87.97 Vandoren-Hazard 4,085.00 Widmer Bros 174.O0 Winner Industries 4.61 Water Products 553.80 Co~missioner of Revenue G,138.~2 Director of Prom Tax ~g.~_~2 Falls & Nyhusmoen 4,654.00 Griggs, Cooper 2,331.08 Johnson Bros. Liq. 3,O41.21 Labor Relations Assoc 97.00 City of Mound 38.O1 City of Mound 77.24 City of Mound 20.00 Mound Postmaster 600.00 MN State Documents 124.50 Mound Postmaster 120.O0 City of Mound 8.26 Old Peoria 1,325.20 Ed Phillips 1,717.97 Jon Scherven 59.00 State Treasurer 1,416.71 R. L. Youngdahl 5,723.00 TOTAL BILLS 95,203.81