Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2000-07-25
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 25, 2000, 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. APPROVE AGENDA. *CONSENT AGENDA *A. *B. *C. *D. *E. PAGE APPROVE MINUTES: JULY 11, 2000, REGULAR MEETING. 3169-3185 PAYMENT OF BILLS ........................... 3186-3206 APPROVAL OF LICENSES AND PERMITS ................. 3207 SET PUBLIC HEARING: 1. CASE # 00-38 BRISTOL CLASSICS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 2642 COMMERCE BOULEVARD: AUG 8 .......... 3208-3209 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. CASE #00-36: MANCHESTER - MINOR SUBDIVISION. 3210-3224 2. CASE #00-37: MANCHESTER - VARIANCE ........ 3225-3239 COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (TIMEKEEPER WILL LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) PUBLIC HEARING CASE #00-22 & 00-23: LANGDON BAY PUD AND STREET VACATION ................................. 3240-3326 PROPOSAL FOR SKATE PARK BY AREA YOUTH ............ 3327-3328 ACTION ON PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT ................. 3329-3331 3167 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Se o STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR ORIDNANCE AMENDMENT ON AGENDA PUBLICATION ............................. STAFF REPORTS: UPDATE ON STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSIDERATIONS ............................ 10. 11. 3332-3335 3336-3339 UPDATE ON MEDIATION PROCESS FOR 2200 BLOCK OF COMMERCE BOULEVARD. C. UPDATE ON CORRESPONDENCE WITH B & D NETKA .... 3340-3356 D. UPDATE ON OPEN SPACE REFERENDUM PROCESS ..... 3357-3371 WORKSHOP CONTINUATION: CONDUCTING MORE EFFICIENT MEETINGS. (PLEASE BRING THE THINGS FROM THE LAST MEETING.) INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS AMM Fax News ................................. 3372 Financial Reports through June 30, 2000 ................ 3373-3376 Liquor Store Semi-Annual Report through June, 2000 ......... 3377-3379 3168 July 25, 2000 REMINDER: Mayor and Council are reminded to bring the materials for a continuation of the discussion on more efficient council meetings. Thanks! #5.A. Lanedon Bay PUD and Street Vacation Staff has taken a hard line with the developer on this project, requiring that they upgrade West Edge Boulevard with this development. This is probably the last opportunity for the City to have West Edge improved to a collector street standard, as designated in the Comprehensive Plan, and at very little cost to the City. There potentially can be multiple contributors to this project. There would be County participation for drainage improvements. There can be City participation through the City's funding ofoversizing of infrastructure. There can be assessments to the benefiting property owners on the Mound side of the road. City of Minnetrista staff was firm in their opinion that their city would not participate in the construction of a road. They thought the Council would be receptive to receiving the road at the cost of the developer. Mound City Council members are recommended to take this same firm line, with the credit to the developer described in the memo by John Cameron. #8. A~enda Publication Requirement Please refer to Subd 3 - Agenda of Section 155 - The Council of the Mound City Code. As you can see, there is no requirement for publication in the Ordinance--just that The Laker be delivered an agenda for their information. State Statute also has no requirement for publication. Publication in The Laker has simply been a tradition. It is becoming increasingly difficult to achieve. Their deadline is Wed noon; when a holiday falls within the week, the deadline is Tuesday--a week in advance ora Council meeting. I don't think there needs to be an ordinance amendment. Rather, I propose that those among us simply agree on the interpretation as being that no publication is required, and that public notification take place through postings at the entrance of City Hall and on the Mound web page three days before a council meeting. Doing so meets the legal requirements. 9.D. Ooen Soace Referendum The process will take place as described in packets. The only ground rule: Treat the open house as a polling place. Members of boards and commissions who chose to be present play the role of listeners only and present the appearance of neutrality on the premises. No opposing sides will be presented at the occasion, allowing the voters to form their independent opinions to the fullest extent possible. Other: Livable Communities Grant Bruce Chamberlain can be credited with successfully attaining a first-cut position among grant applicants for the Livable Communities Grant. The award of this $400,000 grant, should that be achieved, will go toward transportation elements of the Mound Visions COUNCIL BRIEFING July 25, 2000 Please look for your Council Briefing on your email by the end of the day on Monday, July 24. Any one having difficulties opening their mail may see Jodi for a copy. Thanks for your understanding. It's been a horrendous week. K. DRAFT MINUTES - CITV COUNCIL - JULY 11, 2000 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 11, 2000, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Pat Meisel; Council Members: Andrea Ahrens, Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, and Leah Weycker. Also in attendance were City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Frank Clark, City Building Official Jon Suthedand, James Prosser of Ehlers & Associates, and Recording Secretary Diana Mestad. The following interested citizens were also present: Rhonda Wich, 5585 Sherwood; Troy Hicks, 2255 Westedge Blvd, Minnestrista; Steve Coddon, 3615 Lyric Ave, Orono; Peter Meyer, Sunset Road; Phil Schroder, VFW; Bart Roesen, 2260 Westedge Blvd.; Michael Deriel, 2208 Burn Lane; Bill and Dorothy Netka, 2360 Commerce; Ken Custer, 5310 Bartlett; Lorrie Ham, The Laker; David Greensled, 2567 Commerce; Sharon Keogh; Wayne E. Ehlebracht; Karen Cole, St. Paul; Allison Swanson, St. Paul. *Consent Agenda: All items fisted under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Meisel opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. and welcomed the people in attendance. The pledge of allegiance was recited. APPROVE AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Weycker requested that item A be removed from the consent agenda. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown, to approve the agenda and consent agenda with the removal of Item A. The roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0. CONSENT AGENDA *1.0 PAYMENT OF BILLS. *1.1 AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT AND THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT REGARDING CDBG FUNDS AND SENIOR FOUNDATION. Mound City Council Minutes, July 11, 2000 '1.2 '1.3 ~ll~T PUllLIC IIEARIN~J~;: CAblE/~00-22 & 00-23: LANGDON BY PUD AND STREET/EASEMENT VACATION: JULY 5, 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: A. APPROVE REVISION TO SECTION 320 OF CITY CODE: CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND. B. APPROVE REVISION TO SECTION 330:85 OF CITY CODE: FINAL PLAT, RECORDING FORM. C. CASE tt00-31: MINOR SUBDIVISION- 5212 & 5240 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD, CODEN MILLER PARTNERSHIP. 1.4 APPROVE MINUTES: JUNE 27, 2000, SPECIAL MEETING; JUNE 27, 2000, REGULAR MEETING. Council Member Weycker stated that the references to the dock commission should be changed to read LMCD. MOTION by Weycker, seconded by Brown to approve the Minutes of the June 27, 2000 meeting as amended above. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0. 1.5 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ABOUT SUBJECTS NOT ON THE AGENDA. (PLEASE LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SUBJECT.) Council Member Brown stated that the public present should be made aware that the items in the consent agenda had been approved. The City Manager stated that the closing for the True Value took place today and that the ground breaking is set for Monday, July 17 at 10:00 a.m. 1.6 DISCUSSION ON OPEN SPACE STUDY. James Prosser, Ehlers & Associates, referred to the memo included in the meeting packet regarding the referendum questions. Mr. Prosser stated that there were issues needing closure before a final decision on the questions could be made. The referendum questions contained in the memo are a suggested course of action only. Mr. Prosser stated that there were four questions that needed to be addressed. First, is the issue of the size of the parcel. Secondly, the question of the cost to bring the parcel into compliance with code needs to be addressed. Third, the question as to what level of improvement is Mound City Council Minutes. July 11, 2000 DRAFT appropriate to make the parcel reasonable for publlc use. Finally, whether or not a second referendum question is necessary. In reference to the intended size of the parcel, Mr. Prosser stated that it appears that the original intent was to include the entire athletic field. The City Attorney stated that it is very important to respect the intent of the petitioners. In reference to the building and safety codes objectives, a civil engineer has inspected the site and this report is included in the meeting packet. The cost to meet code is $150,000. This includes some removal of items rather than repair. The cost of developing the parcel for public convenience is subjective. A cost of $300,000 to improve the park from a public convenience standpoint is given simply as information. These costs could be deferred. Mr. Prosser referred to page 3 of a memo he presented to Council at the meeting that lists the costs of each item in question. He stated that the cost of the land is not from an appraisal, but $1.4 million is the best number available at this time. An appraisal is underway and should be complete in two weeks. Mr. Prosser stated that items 4 and 5 are very dependent on Council judgment as to what they wanted to do. He further stated that the $1.45 million figure for development to community athletic field standards is a conservative figure and would be necessary for continuous use of the fields including lighting, grading fields, drainage, and parking. This amount is not added to the other costs, but would be inclusive of the other improvements. Council Member Ahrens asked what the additional items in Central Community Park standards would be. Mr. Prosser stated that better signage and better planting materials would be included with the idea of revitalizing the park to the level of the Mound Vision Plan. This would include a portion to be put aside for a park area/picnic and a higher upgrade of the children's play area, paths, and furniture. Council Member Brown asked how much use time could be expected from the minimal use upgrade of $800,000. Mr. Prosser stated that sustained use seasonally would be limited to about 50% of a full time use as there would be issues with turf degradation. Mr. Prosser stated that good weather could allow a 2/3 time use. The difference would basically be between a neighborhood occasional use type of park and an athletic field scheduled on a regular basis. Mayor Meisel inquired how firm the land value estimate exclusive of the commercial zone was. Mr. Prosser stated that he is reasonably comfortable with this number. Council Member Hanus asked whether the additional 1.8 acres was more valuable and whether it is accounted for in the estimate. Mr. Prosser stated that yes it is more valuable and that is included in the estimate. Mound City Council Minutes. July 11.2000 ORAF/. Mr. Prosser stated that he does not want to represent that there is currently a contract implied, but he is reasonably comfortable. He further stated that losing the commercial area would be about 40%. Mr. Prosser stated that the issue is of where to go next and he has identified some options for consideration. Mr. Prosser state that there is a need to represent to the public what land is included. Page 4 of his memo summarized the issue including the advantages and disadvantages. Mr. Prosser stated that Council would need to find a way to find the money for the improvements to the parcel. Council Member Brown stated that it will take $1.3 million to buy the property and that is what the referendum will cover. He asked whether an additional $1.5 million for improvements is required. Mr. Prosser stated that there is a range involved beginning with a minimum to acquire the full parcel and improve the land for safety and code improvements the cost of which is $1.65 total. This is $350,000 short of what the bond would support. The high end would be to ask for an additional $1.4 million to do all the improvements. Mr. Prosser stated that there is also a question as to whether the petitioners meant to say that the City would spend $1.3 only to acquire the property. The advantages and disadvantages of this are included on page 4 of the memo. Council Member Ahrens asked what would happen if the first question passed but not the second. Mr. Prosser stated that the issue needed to be addressed as to whether these two questions would be connected. The City Attorney stated the referendum could be worded so that if the first question were approved then the second question would be whether the funds should be spent. Council Member Brown stated that there was no sense in acquiring the park if it would not be useable. Council Member Hanus stated that rather then tying the two questions together; it could be a deliberation issue after the election as to whether or not to pursue this. Mr. Prosser stated it could also be a policy direction as part of the communication regarding this. The intent could be only to proceed with the acquisition if funds were available for the improvements. This could be included in the project communications. He felt it would be easier to get the issues on the table now. The City Attorney stated that there would be at least one ballot question but that there is a question as to whether there should be a second question. The point is that the money made available from the first question will only be enough to acquire the property and the question before the Council is whether to acquire the property on that basis or apply to get additional funds 4 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11.2000 DRAFT for the improvements. What is being asked of the Council is if first question passes, are they willing to consider spending additional taxpayer money to improve the parcel and what amount should be asked for the improvements. The City Attorney felt that the second question is best left as a betterment issue. Mr. Prosser feels the second question should be for betterment and additional money to purchase the land. The City Attorney feels that the petitioners have determined how much to spend on the land and that number should be should be the final number. The City Attorney is recommending that the first question be as presented by the petitioners and that the second question fall somewhere in the range of the improvement costs. Pages 3121 and 3122 of the meeting packet show the potential questions for the ballot. Council Member Hanus questioned the use of the word equipping. Council Member Weycker asked if the question could be changed. The City Attorney stated that it would be possible to run changes by the bond specialist for the second question but the first question is out of Council control as it is as written on the petition. Council Member Brown suggested that the language on the second question read The City Council to issue and sell bonds in an amount not to exceed $1.4 million to finance the costs for a full time recreational and park facility. He felt it was important to tell the public that the use would be full time recreational and let the public know what funds this use would require. The City Attorney stated that this wording was clearer than equipping and that he would run this by the bond specialist. Council Member Hanus asked if this proposed language passed, would the Council still have the option to scale back the improvements. The City Attorney said no, the City would have to do the full-blown park as was stated in the question. Council Member Brown asked about restating the question to read include the ability to upgrade the park to a standard, which may include. The City Attorney felt the ballot question would become too complex at this point. He stated that the bond specialist liked "equipping" and more detail could be given in information prior to the bond voting. Council Member Ahrens stated that the language needed to be very specific. Council Member Brown asked if the $1.4 million figure should be part of the question. Council Member Hanus felt that would give the City all the options. Mayor Meisel stated that people needed to know what was required to do the improvements and $1.4 million was the number. Council Member Hanus stated that if by using the suggested language, could the City then sell a bond of lesser value. The City Attorney stated yes. Mound City Council Minutes. July 11.2000 DRAFT The City Attorney stated that it was standard policy that the amount of the increased tax would be put on the ballot but that putting the higher number on the ballot may mean less people would vote for the second question. Council Member Hanus stated that maintenance could not be included on this ballot and that would require a full time employee. Council Member Brown thought two employees would be necessary. Mr. Prosser stated that the estimated cost for maintenance is about $20,000 per year. The City Manager stated that this cost would be mentioned in the Q&A that is being prepared. Mr. Prosser stated that installation of an irrigation system would increase the maintenance cost. Council Member Hanus asked where the costs for the bonding process are loaded in. Mr. Prosser stated that the cost was roughly $100,000 and that this cost is not included in the questions. Council Member Ahrens confirmed that this $100,000 would come out of the money for the first question. The City Attorney stated that this could be spread between both questions. Council Member Brown stated that there was a possibility that the first question could pass allowing the purchase of the property, but that if the second question did not pass, the City would not be able to do anything with the parcel. Mr. Prosser stated that he felt there should be a policy determination that both questions have to pass before the purchase would proceed. Council Member Ahrens stated that without the safety and code improvements, the City would be liable and insurance costs would rise. Mayor Meisel asked if Mr. Prosser was looking for direction at this time. The City Attorney stated the issue was the second question and what number would be plugged in. Council Member Hanus stated that a second question would be necessary. MOTION, by Brown, seconded Weycker for discussion, to approve the second question with a number of $1.45 million to include all of the proposed improvements to the park. Discussion: Council Member Weycker stated that the communication pieces for the public should emphasize that the $1.45 million was a high-end range. The City Manager stated that the cost would be described in the varying degrees of improvement in the communication pieces. 6 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11. 2000 DRAFT Council Member I-Ianus stated that the number sounded high, but the City does not know exactly where the downtown will be and this will help to keep all the options open to make this park fit in the Mound Vision Plan. Council Member Weycker asked the park board what the intent of the commercial piece was. Peter Meyer, Chair of the Open Space Task Force, referred to recommendation made to Council on June 7 for the improvements. He stated that the task force had always intended the petition to include all the green space including the commercial portion. Mr. Meyer questioned some of the numbers included in the $1.4 million for improvements. He stated that the task force recommended that there would not have to be any upgrades that would significantly increase the cost of the property and that $150,000 was the number for the basic improvements. Mr. Meyer questioned the cost for improvements to the bleachers. Mayor Meisel stated that it was the new code that would require the improvements. Mr. Meyer felt the concrete bleachers did meet code at this time. Mr. Meyer stated that there was no need for the water, grading, and utilities at this time and that a sixty-car parking lot was not necessary. The task force has recommended contacting the adjoining business for a joint parking lot. He stated that parking has been allowed on one side of Bellaire in the past for the skating rink, which would add 15 to 20 spaces. Mr. Meyer stated that the hockey rink already has lighting and boards and the Hockey Association will put up new boards. The baseball dugouts are only one year old and could be kept and the baseball fields need no improvements. Mr. Meyer felt that the softball field improvements of $45,000 were not necessary. The site already has a batting cage. Mr. Meyer stated that the soccer field has goals and the Soccer Association will put new goals in if necessary. Mr. Meyer felt that the proposed site trails are not necessary and are not in any of the other parks. The site fencing already exists. In reference to the cost of site irrigation at $60,000, Mr. Meyer stated that the baseball field is fine as is and there is water at the soccer field. Mr. Meyer felt that security lighting at a cost of $25,000 is not necessary and that the task force felt that $40,000 for landscaping was also unnecessary. In reference to the proposed concession buildings with restrooms, Mr. Meyer stated that two Mound parks have buildings with restrooms that the public is not allowed to use and that satellites are brought in instead. Mr. Meyer stated that the warming house already exists. Mr. Meyer stated that he does not feel that this is at all the recommendation that the task force gave and he feels this will turn the public off. He feels the numbers are unrealistic and that the public should know exactly what the proposed improvements are. He disagrees that the park could only be used half the time without the full improvements as it is used heavily now. Mound City Council Minutes. July 11. 2000 DRAFT Council Member ttanus asked how many hours per day the park is currently used. Council Member Brown stated the parcel was in use from 4:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday for baseball. Council Member Hanus stated that is what Mr. Prosser said the park could be used for without improvements. Council Member Brown addressed some of the issues Mr. Meyer brought up and stated that those improvements are part of the American Disabilities Act. He felt that if this was the center of town, it should be really nice. Council Member Brown pointed out that not all of the $1.4 million would need to be spent, but the option would be there. Council Member Brown asked whether the current warming house was nice. Mr. Meyer stated that it was nice and was not lacking anything. Mr. Meyer stated that he does not see why this park has to be at a different level than the other parks. Council Member Hanus stated that Mr. Meyer and others had argued for a community park over the last year that specifically would be a different park from the others. Mr. Meyer stated he was taking about ball fields or playfields. Council Member Hanus stated the language used was different, but that people were asking for a higher-level park. Council Member Weycker asked what dollar amount for improvements Mr. Meyer was looking at. Mr. Meyer felt a group discussion should be held to decide this and that the task force recommendation was made June 7. Mr. Meyer has been trying to contact Staff about this. Council Member Weycker stated that she understands Mr. Meyer's concerns and does agree that the number is really high. Mr. Meyer wants to come up with a more realistic number. Council Member Hanus asked Mr. Prosser if in the analysis of the line items, did he look at the property and the items and only add in to bring it to a new condition because of dilapidation or why were these on the list. Mr. Prosser stated the $1.5 was an estimate of cost for this size parcel to convert it to a community park standard as opposed to neighborhood park standards. Mr. Prosser stated that the code issues were the results of actual inspections and those numbers were valid. Ken Custer, 5310 Bartlett, asked whether this space could be added in for more hardcover in downtown and then use TIF money for drainage and some of the other things TIF money is approved for. The City Attorney stated that if this is green space it is calculated as open space for hardcover and will be claimed. Mr. Custer stated that some of the items appeared to conform to the TIF requirements. The City Attorney stated that after the first of this year, TIF could no longer be used for recreational activities and that the park does not generate TIF. Mr. Custer asked if the parking was part of downtown, could TIF money be used. The City Attorney stated that would be difficult to convince the state auditor of this. 8 Mound City Council Minutes, July 11. 12000 DRAFT Council Member Weycker stated that the booster groups for the various sports would supply things. Mayor Meisel stated that the City could not depend on this. Council Member Weycker suggested that the City pay the cost and the booster clubs be charged a user tee. Mr. Meyer stated this has been passed, but was never implemented. Mr. Meyer stated that in regard to the parking area, he feels the parking needs are fine now and more asphalt is not necessary. Council Member Brown stated this was a safety and liability issue. Mr. Meyer stated this has worked fine for 50 years. Council Member Hanus stated that Mr. Meyer was looking at things as they had been in the past and wanting things to continue that way. Mr. Meyer said yes, the task force has recommended the same usage. Council Member Hanus stated that the problem was that then the potential to grow this into a community park would not be there. Council Member Brown stated that the $1.4 would allow the City to move forward. David Granseld, 5046 Bakerford Road, feels that the park is being made too big. He feels it can remain as is for a year or two and the improvements can be phased in. Mr. Gransfeld feels that the City could come up with $150,000 per year to work toward this and that parks take a long time to develop. The City could get the use of these fields in the meantime. Council Member Hanus stated that the $150,000 would not be there. Mr. Gransfeld stated that he liked the idea of the people deciding what the tax would be, but felt it would be the same as raising taxes for a general fund. Mayor Meisel pointed out that people would know these funds were to be dedicated for this. Council Member Brown stated that people are angry when the costs continue to grow on a project. Council Member Hanus stated that the point is that this cannot be more without cutting into the general fund. Mr. Gransfeld is concerned that this will influence the first question. Mayor Meisel stated that information would be sent out to inform the public of the exact numbers. Mr. Meyer stated that the $20,000 figure for the maintenance of the facility for a season was higher than the task force estimates of $12,000. Council Member Hanus pointed out that this would depend on what was being maintained. Council Member Ahrens stated the lower number would be to maintain what was there and not the community park. Mr. Meyer felt that the task force had considered all the maintenance considerations. Mr. Prosser stated that the number may also have included some utilities and the intent was to use the numbers from the green space committee. Council Member Weycker stated she felt the number could be tightened up but she was concerned about the time crunch. She felt it was possible to do a good job in the communication pieces to 9 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11. 2000 DRAFT let people know. Mayor Melsel stated it is always her intent to send out the clearest information possible in the Q&As. Council Member Weycker suggested inviting the booster clubs for input. Mayor Meisel called the question. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried 5-0. Direction was given to the City consultants to complete the fiscal impact component of the question. Council Member Hanus stated there should be discussion of the term. Mayor Meisel stated there was a need to set dates for open houses and Q&As. The City Manager stated the deadlines are pending for the Q&As. Mr. Prosser stated that there is a draft pending that could be ready by the end of the week. Council Member Weycker confirmed that the breakdown of dollars needed to be added in. Mr. Prosser asked whether a community participation discussion would be before or after the referendum. Mr. Prosser also stated that the maintenance cost estimate came from the task force and also includes the additional amount for a skating rink for $5,000 to $10,000 also from the task force information. The City Attorney stated that regarding Council Member Hanus' question about filling in blanks, Ehlers would take a typical issue of the same type to use. Council could decide on a different term. Hanus stated that he thought the information passed out to the public should be more accurate. The City Attorney agreed with this. Council Member Hanus asked whether Mr. Prosser would be getting the numbers set shortly. Mr. Prosser stated that it would typically be a twenty-year tenn. Council Member Hanus asked whether the language on page 3122 of the meeting packet would be part of the question. The City Attorney said yes it would be on the ballot. Council Member Hanus felt this was misleading and that the term should be predetermined. The City Attorney said no, it would not be known until it was time to sell the bonds. The City Attorney stated the language was a legal requirement. Council Member Ahrens pointed out that all the lines were stated as estimates. The City Attorney stated it was basically for people to understand that taxes would go up. Mr. Prosser states it is anticipated to sell these bonds prior to the end of the year and that interest rates are currently fluctuating. 10 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11.2000 DRAFT The City Manger talked about establishing a policy after the referendum to approach the decision as to whether one question is tied to the other. Mayor Meisel and Council Member Ahrens agreed that approval of both questions were important to move forward. Council Member Weycker felt that it would be possible to buy the land and close it down until it could be brought to code. Council Member Brown felt both questions should pass. Council Member Hanus felt that it would take a long time to find the code money out of the general fund. He stated that a 5% increase in the levy represents a few thousand dollars. He felt the public would feel it was a mistake to buy property the City cannot take care of or use. Mayor Meisel asked if the City Manager needed a directive. The City Manager stated that a consensus was fine. Council Member Weycker stated that creative financing could be found by approaching the user groups. Mayor Meisel pointed out that every year the City would be out begging. Council Member Weycker felt by making the two question contingent, the City would lose the green space. Council Member Hanus stated that according to the petition and the people in front of the Council for the last year, the people want to use the fields. Council Member Weycker stated that those would be the minimal improvements and there were other options that could be considered. Council Member Hanus stated that if the City was spending this much money for property it was necessary to have a plan in place to improve the property. Council Member Weycker agreed with this, but felt that making the questions contingent did not allow the people to vote for simply the green space. Council Member Hanus stated if the Council were in the situation of not being able to do anything with the property, the City would not want the property. Council Member Weycker stated it was not doing nothing, but gaining the land and waiting to do something. 1.7 ADDITIONAL ITEMS RELATING TO RAY MAR PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT. This issue was covered by the City Manger earlier in the meeting when she announced the closing on the True Value property. 11 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11. 2000 DRAFT 1.8 ACTION ON VFIvV SUGGESTION FOR NAME CHANGE FOR AUDITOR'S ROAD. Council Member Hanus stated that he agrees with the City Manager's recommendation to wait on renaming this road. Mayor Meisel, and Council Members Brown, Ahrens, and Weycker all agreed. Mayor Meisel explained to the public information officer from the VFW that prior discussions involved waiting to see what ends up being developed before the road is named. The VFW officer stated that the money being offered is not contingent on the naming issue. MOTION, by Brown, seconded by Hanus, to accept the VFW donation for benches and signage. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0. Council Member Brown asked the VFW officer about the status of the discussion for a lighted monument. The VFW officer stated that was not being considered for this portion and that two plaques were being purchased for another location. Mayor Meisel stated that in other towns, the green space and parks had walkways with trees, benches and "in memory of' plaques. Council Member Hanus stated the City has a program for this. Mayor Meisel called a break at 9:20 p.m. Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 9:37 p.m. Mayor Meisel stated that during the break, a request to move item number 9 ahead of number 8 was made and would be granted. A citizen requested to speak out of order and was allowed by the Mayor to do so. Michael Deriel, 2208 Burn Lane, spoke regarding the redevelopment program. He stated that he had emphasized on April 11 the need to feel the pulse of the residents to get full cooperation. He felt it was important to the Council to take into consideration that the Council should work together and for the people. He stated there is currently a rough drat~ of a proposed petition going through to collect signatures in order for the City Council to understand that people are concerned. He does not want the final downtown redevelopment agreement with the developer to be signed before the issue goes on referendum. Mr. Deriel feels the election will be based on the downtown redevelopment. He does not feel the plan being offered is a great plan and he has concerns about conflict of interest issues. Mr. Deriel feels that not considering the peoples' wishes is a blow to democracy and that this is a public issue and not one for individuals. Oen Meon stated that regarding the redevelopment issue; she does not feel that the current plans for Auditors or the Langdon area reflect a benefit for the business owners and the community. 12 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11. 2000 DRAFT ghe is formally requesting a public referendum on the issue or a postponement ora final agreement with the Beard group until after the November election. Dorothy Nankin, 2360 Commerce, stated that she agreed with the speakers before her and has written letters to the City stating that they wish to build to conform and has received no response. David Grensfeld, 2567 Commerce, stated there has been a lot of work put into this to date and he appreciates and recognizes this. He pointed out that a brochure regarding the redevelopment states that the reason for the development is due to the problems with the current layout and orientation of the downtown. He stated that possibly the problem has been solved with the improvements made to the roads downtown. Mr. Grensfeld wants a minimal impact on the current business owners along Shoreline. Mr. Grensfeld wondered if the real problem was that the current owners do not fit into the Vision Plan. The City Attorney stated that this has been going on for fourteen years and that he felt Mr. Grensfeld's questions were important and complex and encouraged him to call City Hall for the names of consultants who could answer his questions. Mayor Meisel stated that she would offer the same solution and also that the City Manager could help with these questions. 1.9 WORKSHOP: CONDUCTING MORE EFFICIENT MEETINGS. Mayor Meisel stated that page 3136 of the meeting packet is an agenda she made up for conversation and a starting point. She stated that this agenda discussed defining the roles of each Council member and changes on how public hearings are held. There would be no discussion by Council between staff presentation and the public hearing. The Council would discuss the issue after the hearing only. Enforcement of a rule to have a bell that sounds after three minutes is also suggested. The City Attorney asked whether the Council felt the meetings were too long. All members of the Council agreed that they are. The City Attorney asked each Council member to pick one thing that they thought would shorten the meeting. Council Member Ahrens thought it was a good exercise for each member to come up with one or two things that could be done to shorten the meeting. The City Clerk suggested that several mayors over the years have stated that there could not be repetitions of statements during a public hearing or the hearing would be closed. The City Attorney felt this was too harsh and that some people who wanted to speak might not be able to. The City Attorney felt the Council should work as a team on how to approach this. The City Attorney asked if it was appropriate for people to speak more than once during a hearing. Council Member Brown felt it was not appropriate. Council Member Ahrens felt that 13 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11~ 2000 DRAFT task force members should not come in and argue with the Council once a report is presented. The City Attorney questioned how this would look to the public. Council Member Hanus stated that he has sat on other commissions that have tried to deal with this issue. He felt that in terms of repetition, it should be stopped if possible, but unfortunately this could come across as being short. Council Member Hanus did not like idea of limiting the amount of time for discussion on an item. Council Member Brown suggested that there is a tendency to argue with the public that comes forward to speak and he does not feel that Council should do that. He suggested having the City Planner speak, open the floor to the property owner, open the public hearing, close the hearing, and then having the Council discuss the issue with no additional public discussion allowed at that point. Council Member Hanus stated that in most cases there is no need for the applicant to speak. Council Member Brown felt it was a nice gesture. Council Member Ahrens felt it cost too much time to allow this. The City Attorney suggested that when speaking with the applicant ahead of time, Staff could let them know that there is no obligation to speak. Council Member Hanus stated that the applicants paid money for the process and should be heard up to the point of the vote even on a public hearing. The City Manager stated that once a public hearing is closed, it is Council's prerogative to ask questions of the applicant. Council Member Hanus mentioned that arguing with the people does not go anywhere. He does feel that applicants should get answers. The City Attorney stated it was important to make sure the applicant does not restate their points during the Council's debate. The City Manager stated that some councils limit speaking to two times and the second time must be additional information, not repetition. She pointed out the public hearing process outlined in a brochure from Minnetonka. The City Manager stated that at the school board meetings, individuals are allowed three minutes and groups are allowed five minutes. Her prior position set amounts of time that were allowed depending on the issues involved. Council Member Weycker stated that she felt the three minute limit has made it worse. She does feel that it is the people's time to address the Council and this needs to be taken seriously and they need to be referred to the appropriate place for an answer. 14 Mound City Council Minutes, July 11. 2000 DRAFT The C{ty Attorney stated that some groups require a written request and supporting information. The City Manager stated that this makes sure that real issues are brought forward. Council Member Hanus was concerned about how the public would perceive this. Council Member Weycker felt that 90 percent of the talking was coming from the Council itself. She further stated that she appreciates the City Manager's summary memo. Mayor Meisel stated that Staff recommendations should include the reasons why the recommendations were made. Council Member Weycker stated that the difference from the applications opinion should be stated. Council Member Ahrens stated that during the senate and house hearings, there are red, green, and yellow lights to limit speaker time. Council Member Weycker stated that this could be tried, but she felt the restrictions should be on the Council and not the public. Council Member Ahrens stated that she found it interesting that people come in to ask questions and do not think to call the City Manager during business hours. Mayor Meisel asked for a consensus to try to change the public hearings as stated above for four meetings. Council Member Hanus stated this could be tried, but some issues involve a dialogue with the applicant. There was a general consensus to try the new rules for public hearings. Mayor Meisel stated that she liked a five minute limit for each Council member to speak. The City Manager asked if changes should be made to the public forum. Mayor Meisel stated that she liked the idea of resisting a dialogue with the speaker and instead directing them to the person who can answer the question. Council Member Ahrens suggested stating at beginning of the public forum that without adequate time to research, Council will refer the speaker to Staff or the next meeting. The City Attorney stated that the agenda should be clear that there might not be a response from the Council at that point. He also stated that most people are not addressing the Council, but rather a larger audience. Council Member Brown liked the suggestion of not having the television camera going during the public's comments. Council felt this could be done prior to calling the meeting to order. Council Member Ahrens stated that a time limit would need to be set for this. The City Attorney stated this usually caused the number of people talking to drop. Council Member Hanus did not feel this was a big deal and that this is not the largest section of the meeting. 15 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11. :2000 D AF'F Council Member Ahrens stated that if'an item was not on the agenda in advance and people spoke on these items, the consultants were being paid to sit through this. Mayor Meisel stated this could be moved to the end, but she did not feel this would shorten the meeting. Council Member Brown suggested postponing this discussion until a special meeting could be held. Council Member Ahrens suggested everyone write some items down that they felt could shorten the meeting and give them anonymously to the City Planner for future discussion. The City Attorney stated that some city councils do not consider variances. Mayor Meisel stated that she had attached a public hearing procedures list that should be kept for future use. A workshop meeting on this issue on July 18 was suggested. Council Member Weycker could not attend on this date. The City Manager suggested that she incorporating some of the changes in the next meeting and to try these out to see how they work before holding the next meeting. Council Member Hanus stated that the HRA meeting has to be addressed. Council Member Brown spoke about terms limits being an issue. Mayor Meisel stated this would be part of the workshop discussion. The City Manager stated she would bring the workshop back for ten to twenty minutes at each meeting to work on. 1.10 EXECUTIVE SESSION: MATTER OF LITIGATION. At 10:40 p.m., Council moved into executive session. Council Member Weycker left the meeting at this time. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS 1. AMM FAX NEWS. 2. 2001 LMCD BUDGET. 3. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MINUTES - MAY 24, 2000. 4. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JUNE, 2000. 16 Mound City Council Minutes. July 11.2000 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by , seconded by to adjourn the meeting at unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 4-0. DRAFT p.m. The vote was Kandis Hanson, City Manager Attest: Mayor Meisel 17 PAYMENT BILLS DATE: JULY 25, 2000 BILLS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BATCH # #0071 AMOUNT $299,890.04 TOTAL BILLS $299,890.04 PAGE 6 SU'~ARIZED ~URCHASE JOURNAL AP-Cu2-OS r. TTV r~' PAGE I P u ~ C n A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C62-OZ CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE AOlll 000630 DUE HOLD PRE _j.J~.J~_ STATUS .... ~OJNI----D£~,~P~!C~ ...................... ACCOUN$ NUMbE~ .... A 15.34 THRU 06-30-00 296-905B 25.47 THRU 06-30-00 590-435~ 25.47 THRU 06-30-00 590-4351 ..... ~---~J~9,-U-~3~O-965-67~g ..... 6.83 THRU 00-30-00 554-6520 6.~3 TH~U 06-30-00 554-65Z0 Z7.08 06-00 HA~ELL, LEN 581-6401 27.0B 06-00 BLAZER 5~1-6404 01-4090-3220 01-4280-3220 73-7300-3220 78-7800-3220 01-4040-3220 73-7300-3220 76-7800-3220 04-~140-3220 01-4140-3220 01-4140-3220 01-41q0-3220 01-41~0-3220 01-4140-3220 27.08 06-00 S@UAD #$41 581-6441 32.57 06-00 S~UAD #542 581-6442 ....................... ~--7~Og---~A~~.~4~-591-644~ - 01-4140-3220 27.08 06-00 S~UAD N844 551-6444 01-414n-3220 .39 06-00 MOUND FIRE 723-7560 22-4170-3220 ..................... i~S--~-&O-~-~1~E~&~-gE~-3S~2 ...... 22-4170-3220 -- 1.51 06-00 MOUND FIRE 751-3573 22-4170-3220 7.81 06-00 RESCUE TRUCK 875-4502 22-4170-3220 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR/bELLEVUE VENDOR TOTAL 339.69 ........................ -AOI75 0020005FS-54 70.00 STATE FIRE SCHOOL, MAAS, JASON 22-4170-4110 7/25/00 7/25/00 70.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ALEXANDRIA TECHNICAL COLLE VENDOR TOTAL 70.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 73.55 JRNL-CD lOiO 7/25/00 7/25/00 1,8~i.42 JRNL-CD 1010 A0350 123306 23.40 CITY HALL FLOWERS 01-4320-4100 _ ZJTS/~ 2~Ofl 23=~ JPNL.-~ ............................ 10~0 .... ANTHONYS FLORAL VENDOR TOTAL 23.40 A0397 909494 23.00 0~-01-00 THRU 06-30-00 METER 01-4140-2200 23.00 04-01-00 THRU 06-30-00 METER 01-4090-2200 23.00 04-01-00 THRU 06-30-00 METER 01-4190-2200 23.00 04-01-00 THRU 06-30-00 METER 01-4~40-3210 7.07 04-01-00 THRU 06-30-00 METER 71-7100-3Z10 11.51 04-01-00 THRU 06-30-00 METER 73-7300-3210 7/25/00 7/25/00 153.36 J~NL-CD 1010 AS~rd_~LER MAILING 5Y5~ ~ENDOE Z~TAL ..... &53_~ .......................... AO40~ ~1~57 ~9.5~ CAt4ARY ~EACH PORTABLE TOILET 01-4340-3~00 PAGE 2 AP-C02-01 VENDuR ____ND - !_~ 0 ! C g-~ R P U R C H A S E J 0 IIP N A L CIlY OF "V~UND INVOICE r"UE HOLD ACCOUNT NUMBER 11358 7/25100 7/25/00 49.59 JRNL-CD ................................... 49..59----tiI-G~lL~a~C,-~aa ~O~JA~LE-~OtLE~ 7/25/00 7/25/00 49.59 JRNL-CD - ---~1360 ...... 269~17 ~=3UaD--~-PARK P~RJABLE TOILET ?/25/00 7/25/00 269.17 JRNL-CD 11362 ...... -1J, 363 --.-- lJ~364 11~65 11~66 __11671 11683 7/25/00 7/25/00 ?/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 _aB_P~E.~J4 EN¥1RO,IMEhlAL A0414 24455 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 VFI~gqR~L]2ZAI 0t-4~40-3900 1010 01-4340-3900 1010 01-4340-3900 1010 49.59 JRNL-CD lOlO 4~-59---gkt-I-L4~a-OK4~--gAAK-J~4~R-T~BL~--T~tLEJ- - 01--4340-3900 ..... 49.59 JR.~L-CD 1010 49.5~--.SWE~450~ ~%K--~C~A.~LE TOILET ..... 01-4340-3900 - 49.59 JRNL-CD 1010 ...... 49~.9--JJakR~ POi~S ~4~qK-~IR-TA.BL~- T-Ot 01-4340-3900 49.59 JRNL-CD ]0]0 ---4~,c~9-~RONE PAR~-~Oa~4~B-L~- T~:LtL£J ...... 01-4340--3900 49.59 JRNL-CD 1010 /-'9~5g WYCHWOOD-~EA-CEL-J:~RJ~J:~-~-TOiJ--E-T .... 01--4~3~.0-3900 - - 49.59 JRI,iL-CD 1010 ----25_ OP~-- BLACK LAF.~.i-P-O-V-E-R,--TOILE~'- ........... 01-4340-390~ .... 25.00 JRNL-CD 1010 6D~-OII___J'iQgUVLO__SAY_.pAP,.~_JE..XIRA SERVI CE- .- 01-4340-3Q00 60.00 JRNL-C[: 1010 ~D 7/25/00 7/25/00 ASSUxED 5ECU£~LIX ........... ~£~DDiJ~TAL_ ....... ~0549 32148100 274.85 19176300 1,098.45 117.00 REPAIR LOCKS 01-4320-3830 .1-Z-RA__.~FPAIP LOC-~ .................. 01-4340-2330 .... i34.04 JRNL-CD lOIO BAGS IRNL~CEL 71-7100-2200 .................. lOlO - LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 ................. 7_/~5i~2_ X/~BZDO .......... -1, o9£.43__~RNL-I_O 5ELLbOY CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL 1973.30 -6057~ 0040416753 656.70 l.v. AND VCR 22-4170-5000 7/25/00 7/25/00 656.70 JRNL-CD ~EST BUY CONPANY VENDOR TOTAL 656.70 Pt, GE 3 P U R C h A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-OI C]TY OF MOUND VENDOR I NVO] CE DLIE hOLD PRE- 42A T~.__ $3g~JJ5 ..... ~Y~J].I~T-~ ~DE2~C/i J P~ ~44 ......................... ACCOUNT NUMdER A: 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 31.66 06-00 GARBAGE PICKUP 94.99 JRNL-CD #CM40120 73-7300-3750 #C343+0~20- 7~-7800-3750 1010 ............... 6Z~l--~iL6--O0 ~A4~AGE~I~P~&21- - 22-4170-3750 67.01 JRNL-CD 1010 7125/00 7/25/00 1A4.iO 06-~0 GARS JLGE~CKJJP~£4~H4~3OS. 01-4340-3750 i84.i0 JPNL-CD iOiO 7/25/00 7/25/00 17.76 JRNL-CD iO0~61SZ ~LACNOWIAK AqD SON C0859 045260 CHAMPION AuTO C0920 000715 CITY OF C093~ 24119~A 7/25/00 7/25/00 71-7100-3750 1010 63~1Z_ 06~O~)~RnAnE P~CKtlP #CHP~OA5 .... 0i-4280-3750 67.07 JRNL-CD iOiO VENDOR TOTAl 430.9~ ..... ?~25/00 7/25/~_0 __ 10.64 FAN FOR K-9 S~UAD 1(1.64 .IRNI -Ch VENDOR TOTAL 10.64 17.71 06-00 WATER AND SEWER 7/25/00 7/25/00 i7.7i JRNL-CD VENDOR TOTAL 17.71 A6.87 TAx DN INVt)IFF 7/25/00 7/25/00 46.87 JRNL-CD ............ 6_8..JT.5__Ik% ON INVDTFF 7/25/00 7/25/00 46.75 JRNL-CD C0970 646911~9 238.16 ~IX 01-4140-3810 .................. 1010 .... 71-7100-3740 lOlO ................... ~Z_2~_Z 0_0 1725 / 0~ #24119 ......... 22~4170-5000 .... 1010 .22-4170-.500D . 1010 71-7100-9540 25A-16_~R%L-~ ................... 1010- COCA COLA mOTTLING-MIDWEST VENDOR TOTAL 238.16 Ci019 3713 860.00 INSTALL RETAINING WALL 01-4280-4200 7/25/00 7/25/00 860.00 JRNL-CD ~OIO CO:4CEPT ' ~ ¢'P · ~A,.j~ ING, I~.~C. VEt;DF)~ TOTAL 860.00 ................................. 2,23~_..OO_..~6r_OD P~OF~SSiOI~L~E~iCES 7/25/00 7/25/00 2,234.00 JRNL-CD 01-4110-3120 1010 CHAD.' I CK_ A__ND 81-4350-4200 1010 Cl105 000710 50.00 CARLSON PARK SERVICE CALL CREPEAU DOCKS VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 PA~E 4 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-CD2-O1 C]'[Y OF MOUNP VENDOR INVOICE. DUE HOLD p~E- NE]. INVJ2i~].~_.t,H~-~P DATE -DJ',"[E ._.S]'~IJ.,~S____ AHOUNT --D,F.c-$-C-R!PT-IO4.~ ........................... ACCOUNT NUHbER C1106 1454163 ___ 7L25/0~ 7/25/0~) 43.26 04-13-00 DELIVERY CHARGES 01-4040-3210 1454163 43.26 04-13-00 DELIVERY CHARGES 01-4040-3210 CORPORATE EXPRESS DELIVERY VENDOR TOTAL 86.52 Cl119 65182 4,728.16 SNOW PLOW 01-4340-5000 7/25/00 7/25/00 4,728.16 JqNL-CD 1010 CRYSTEEL DIST INC. VENDOR TOTAL 4728.I6 Cil3O 00~426 7/25/~0 7/25/00 2,021.00 JONL-CD ......................... 22-4170-5000 1010 ¢.4~-B~z~OO---E~ TRA~J-IJDJN-J~OL~ - - 22-4t7,0-5000 .... 7/25/00 7/25/00 4,087.00 JRNL-CD 1010 _ CIIC. TLIM FIR[~PPARATU5 VENDD~T-A-L ..... 01154 08332-b 10.00 BE[R 71-7100-9530 69746 65.00 BEER 71-7100-9530 7/-25~J)-O__ 7/25/00 65.00 JRNb-CD -t~iO 70151 416.80 BEER 7/~5/~0 7/25/00 410.80 JRNL-CD 71-7100-9530 70561 460.00 BEER ?J2DdlO--7~2,~/4-& 460.00 JRNL-CD 71-7100-9530 ................. t-0t0 DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL Dl172 327747 327745 951.80 i23.67 UTILITY 5AG 7/25/00 7/25/00 123.67 JRNL-CD 155.49 POLE 7/25/00 7/25/00 i55.49 JRNL-CD DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT VENDOR TOTAL 279.i6 22-4170-2200 1010 22-4170-2200 1010 _D1200 101796 3~B.On BEER 7/25/0u 7/25/00 308.00 J~NL-CD ......... ~1-7100-9530 - I010 .............................. 952_~5-...~FR-- ......................... 71-7100-g530 7/25/00 7/25/00 952.45 JRNL-CD 1010 10139~ ................................. 3~.80 MI S,-CEJ.~L~& ................. 71-7100-9550. 7/25/00 7/25/00 36.~0 JRNL-CD 1010 933.-.-05 BEER ....... 71-7100-9530. 7/25/00 7/25/00 931.05 JRNL-CD 1010 10~.~,9_ ..................................... ~.5~-Z5_ ~-SC~LLAN~E~%U$ ............... 71-7100-9550 PAGE S P U ,~ C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND VENDUR INVOICE DUE HOLD N~.--IN~.O/F.~_~J~bR--OAI~ ..... D~T~ ..... ST-ATU$-.- ~MOUNT .... DESGR-t-P-T-tON ..... 7/25/00 7/25/00 15.75 JRNL-CD 102851 1,t~04.40 BEER 7/25/00 7/25/00 1,804.40 JRNL-CD 10;~852 102.45 MISCELLANEOUS 7/25/00 7/25/00 102.45 JRNL-CD OAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY VENDgR TOTAL 4150.90 31280 gO21L1-7~t.2-9 7/25/00 7/25/00 530.24 JRNL-CD DiAHOND VOGEL D130U 032905 DIXCO ENGRAVING E1420 650063 32.43 DIRECTION PLATES .............. --3.2.4-S--- VENDOR TOTAL 32.43 351.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 351.00 651465 586.80 7/25/00 7/25/00 586.80 652676 3,65~.i0 7/25/00 7/25/00 3,658.i0 652677 69.55 7/25/00 7/25/00 69.55 o5~070 122.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 122.00 655754 3,864.55 7/25/00 7/25/00 3,864.55 655755 4b.35 7/25/00 7/25/00 40.35 ~AST SIDE BEVERAGE VENDOR TOTAL 8700.35 7/25/00 7/25/00 5,050.00 _L7~Z~ ............................... 10.~1~.0~ 7/25/00 7/25/00 10,810.00 ACCuUNT NUMBER 1010 71-7100-9530 ]010 71-7100-g55o 1010 01-4280-2360 1010 01-4320-2300 1010 BEER KEGS JRNL-CD BEER JR NL- C D BEER JRNL-CD MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 JRNL-CD 1010 PR[ - AM 71-7100-9530 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 BEER 71-7100-9530 JRNL-CO 1010 BEER 71-7100-9530 JRNL-CD iOlO MISCELLANEOUS 71-7100-9550 JRNL-CD 1010 JAN-MAy 2nAO._P~P~OFESS~gNAL SER¥ 55-5880-31~0 JRNL-CD 1010 O~-]~L~J.~,gJ-E~-~i~E~E~I ......... 55-5850-3100 JRNL-CD 1010 55-55&2-3100 1010 __ &Z.A~_Z ......................... J.~Z~73 06~0~ ~J~DON-g-ISIRI~T SERVICE 7/25/00 7/25/00 183.75 JRNL-CD ............................ ~7~ 06-~:L~_ALL~L/~OR, S--ROAD~gER¥$C£-S .... 55-5883-3100 7/25/00 7/25/00 78.75 J~NL-CD 1010 .... 174 7&_____ 06-~3:)~-.~J~-0 P{A-IN$ ~CHOOLDIST 55-5884-3100 PAGE 6 AP-C02-OI EHLE~S F171a P U R C H A SE J CIlY OF ~gUND INVOICE DbE HflLD 7/25/00 7/25/00 2,880.00 & ASSOCIATES INC VENDOR TOTAL 19b02.50 0 u P N A L D E~ .~ C~4 ~4P-T449z,. ....................... ACCOUNT NuHBER JRNL-CD 1010 ................ 1-.4 ! 4 _ 0 ~----14 ~tC ~-4);~F~R~4~C g - ~,Ay ~2000 .......... 01-4040-4110 7/25/00 7/25/00 1,414.08 JRNL-CD 1010 o0[)71 2-A ..... 21.43 7/25100 7125/00 21.43 006 717-~ ..... 2~=27 7/25/00 7/25/00 28.27 7125/00 t~ILE~AC~E RE~.~gU~$E/'~EJ~LT ............ 55-5881-3100 JRNL-CD 1010 05~25 TJ'~J~U--~L6~-5-~LC ~HONE 01-4040-3220 ~ JRNL-CD 1010 FRANCFN[ CLARK __ Gi750 $771427 VENDnR -T~_A~ ..... 1A~S. 78 10,36 07-04-u0 HATS 01-4280-2250 .................... · 0~36-~-84~-~0--~AZ$ .................. 73-7300-2250 10,37 07-04-00 MATS 78-7800-2250 24,26 07-04-00 UNIFORMS 01-4280-2240 24,26--_J2~7_,~00 U~-I~A~ ............ 73-7300-2240 24,26 07-04-00 UNIFORMS 78-7800-2240 7/25/00 103.87 JRNL-CD 1010 29.58 06-27-00 MATS 22-4170-2200 372553 7/25/00 7/25/00 29.58 372552 36.89 7/25/00 7/25/00 36.89 34~821 30.17 7/25/00 7/25/00 30.i7 381715 20.65 07-ii-O0 7/25/00 7/25/00 20.65 JRNL-CD 381713 36.48 7/25/00 3817i2 JRNL-CD lOIO 06-27-00 HATS 01-4340-2330 J~NL-CD 1010 05-16-00 HATS 22-4170-2200 JRNL-CD lOiO '~ATS 71-7100-4210 1010 07-1~-00 HATS 01-4340-2330 1010 01-~280-2250 73-7300-2250 78-7800-2250 01-4280-2240 73-7300-2240 78-7800-2240 1010 ~3 & k SER_ViJZL~S 7/25/00 36.48 JRNL-CD 20.95 07-11-00 ,fiATS 2P, = 96 dlT-11- 0 0 MkIS__ ................. 22,78 07-11-00 U'~ IFORMS 22,78 07-11-00 UNIFORMS 7/25/00 7/25/00 131,20 JRNL-{D ~1800 00u630 50.91 FINANCE CHARGE 22-4170-3820 ..................... 7f25Z00 ~125~00 ....... 5.0.,91 _JRNL-CD ....... 1010 48359 2,683.56 REPAIR LADDER TRUCK 22-4170-3820 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 2734,47 PAGE 7 P U k C H A S [ J 0 U R I~ A L AP-C,J2-O1 CITY OF MF~UND VENDOR iHVOiC£ DUE HOLD PRE- __]::,ILL._~.X~/GJ.£~ 2,i~,~.~k ..... ]b~..T~ .... 2~k]".E--$IA_TUS- --A.MC~Uz~L--~g[S.C~I-P~..L.');4 ........... ACCOUNT NUMb. ER A~- 61887 7430FIkE 99.93 REPLACED WINDSHIELD IN GOAT 22-4170-3820 7 / 25 / 00 7.L2 ~'-0 O ~_]__ ~L~[~. ........ t 010 SLASS PLJS G1890 000630-A VE'~DOR TOTAL 99.93 34.05 34.05 WATER #5158500 WATER #515~500 01-4020-2200 01-4140-4100 ................ ~010 00~630-5 20.90 wATER #515850i ........ ~-5~--~..5~ ................... ~ 6.90--~14_~Cb - 01-4320-2200 10t0 000630-C 4.20 WATER #5156502 01-4280-2200 ~.20 UATER #515~ ................... 73-7~00-2~200 ...... 4.20 WATER #5158502 78-7800-2200 7/25/00 7/25/00 12.60 JRNL-CD 1010 3LENWOOD INGLEWOOD VENDOR TOTAL 107.60 60501 7/25/00 7/25/00 t~20 06-~0 ~,,&~-S 73-7300-3125 103.20 06-00 LOCATES 78-7800-3125 206.40 JRNL-¢D 1010 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, INC VENDOR TOTAL 206.40 G1VtA 12]S4 -1,565.15 122.43 7/25/00 7/25/00 1,687.61 ,~RAFIX SHOPPE VENDOR TOTAL 1687.61 CUSTOM VEJ4-I~L~-~L~RK~J~S ........ 22-2-D00-0000 CUSTOM VEHICLE MARKINGS 22-4170-2200 JRNL-CD 1010 G1972 2~5752 Z~B, O0 7/25/00 7/25/00 78.00 -~- 7t-7-t0~-9-520 JRNL-CD 1010 .......................................... ~,6&.O0 WIqE 7/25/00 7/25/00 368.00 JRNL-CD 7t-7t00-9520 1010 237~,,_l.Z ......................... 7125/00 7/25100 ~60.00 JRqL-CD 71-7100-9520 1010 7125100 7125/00 1,434.34 JRNL-CD ..... 7-i-7t00-9520 1010 ............................ l10~5J1 HISE.~F__LLA1~,iEJ2US ................ 7~-7100-9550 ?/25/00 7/25/00 110.50 JRNL-CD 1010 __ _240S51 ................................. 4.03-gl ~..i~UDR .................. 7/25/00 7/25/00 403.07 JRNL-Cb 7i-7100-9510 1010 !SkI_G.bS COQPER ~ CD~.iP,~L¥ _V£NDOR~.TOTAL_ 3353-_9_1 ....... 31977 000630-A 180.04 THRU 06-30-00 472-3555 ....... 7/2.5100 ..... 7_125Z00 ...... J. gd+O4 _ JFLNL_-CD. ......... 000630-5 162.41 THRU 06-30-00 472-3093 .................. 7 Z2.5/J20 Z/2.5/.OO .... 162.41 JRNL-CD 22-4170-3220 1010 71-7100-3220 1010 AP-CO2-01 V~ NDOR --.Ng~ 1N~'giCg N~;GR ..... ~AZ4~ DA~£- - %T-A$~S .... AMOISNT--J)ESC~-I¢'~-]ON ACCOUNT P d ~ C. P, A S ~ J 0 U ~ N ~ L CIIY OF HOUND INvoIcE DUE HOLD PRE A; 7/25/00 7/25/00 22.14 JRNL-CD G ~.~E_.MI:~N~SO.T.A ...... ~E~JDF)R IOTA~ ~72.50 H2Obl DM42550 25.00 CONTAINER DEMMURAGE TREATMENT V~NDO~ TOTAL 25.00 277.15 7/25/00 7/25/00 277.15 42.47 7/25/0u 7/25/00 42.47 SHERIFF VENDOR TOTAL 319.~2 7/25/00 7/25/00 71,120.05 V[NDOR TOTAL 7~ ~ 5 2,524.00 7/2~/2 ~/~. ~ 524 = nO O007ii-b 2,292.02 7 /2~1~.~_.~J25 /~0 2~..02 O00711-C 9,645.66 O0071I-D 2,047.50 000 71I-E 3,281 .i4 HOISINGTON KUE~LER G.~OUP,~'.~ VE'~DOR TOTAL 19790.32 H2283 8121969 78.30 CABINET AND KNOBS 7/25/00 7/25/00 78.30 JRNL-CD ~OHE DEPuT/G[CF VENDOR TOTAL 78.30 HAWKINS NATER H2139 59981 51980 HENNEPIN COUNTY H21~l CA2JlJ~7. HFNNFPTN CNHNT.y._TREASH~FR H2241 OOO711-A 01-4340-3220~ - 1010 73-7300-2260 1010 INSTALL INTO VEHICLE 22-4170-3820 JRNL-CD 1010 REPAIR MICROPHONE 01-4190-3950 JRNL-CD lO10 A 5 Sf--S-5 ~k,7 --S-ER-W-I-GqE~--~J, INJJ ALL¥- ......... 0<].-40 70-4 200 ..... JRNL-CD 1010 06-00 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 30-5640-3100 JPNL-CD ............................. t-0t0 06-00 TIF RELATED SERVICES 55-5880-3100 JRNL-CD ................ t0t0 ....... 06-00 TIF REALTED SERVICES 55-5880-3100 JRNL-~.JD-- ...................... t010 06-00 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING 01-4190-3100 JRNL~CD ............. t0t0 06-00 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING 01-4190-3100 JRNL-CD ...................... &OtO 01-4320-3630 iOiO 1 ~Y_~_ ~d22~33 ........................... 13-~.~l~-.-~.-~-~ --gg--I m R d ~2 --2-~-J) ~-~J~P4-E R .... 01-4140-2140 - - 7/25/00 7/25/00 176.84 JRNL-CD lOlO iKON nFFI~_~OL~ION$ _ ~NDD~AL ....... 17~4 ....................... I2400 5460 171.45 A/C SYSTE~ RECHARSE 01-4190-3810 ....... 7~00 Z/2 5700 ........ 1Zl~4~--~{~ ....................... t010 5~66 790.37 RADIIATOR. ETC 01-4190-3810 PAb[ 9 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-Cd2-0i CITY OF ?OUhlD VENDOR I NVO ! CE ___N0- -i2 '/Oi ££-~'; bR _.~AT£ ..... DUE HOLD DA-T~ - . -~-T~,-T US - AHO U44I-- -DE S C R4 P -T t-OJ'4 PRE- ACCOUNT N UM[~ ER AM 7/25/00 7/25/00 93.53 JR ;~L-Cd, _ 54~1Z .................................... ~% .~ ~..3~- --£JJEJ_ ---E ~J_~ E~ .... 7/25/00 7125/00 83.36 J~NL-CD _. 5592. 1~_. 00-..~U IT~-H I4~£.S .................... 7125/00 7125100 16.00 JRNL-CD __ 5539 5..7~).5 - ~ L-A CE~ I Gk~,~L--R£ T URN -- 7/25/00 7/25/00 57.05 JRNL-CD 1010 01-4340-3~10 1010 01-~3~0-3810 1010 73-7300-3610 IOlO 1%1 AND PARK C, KF{ LY J2579 1134625 __ VENh.qR TOTAL 224.65 _]Jf2ill) ~ 1ZZSJJ)JL 22~.,- 8-5 L I 9UOR 71-7100-9510 J R ~-L.-C]~ ................... 1010 1134626 148.20 WINE 1136756 334.80 LI (gUOR 1136757 771.90 WINE ?Z?5/RO 772'%1011 771- g.O IRNL-CD 71-7100-9520 ............. t-0-10 71-7100-9510 .................... 1010 .... 71-7100-9520 ..... 4010 JOHNSON J2610 000713 ~ROTHERS LIQdOR VENDOR TOTAL JUBILEE FOODS KZ~_~_ 33742-A .... __ 33742-[ 7/25/00 7/25/00 VENDOR TOTAL 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25100 7/25/00 1479.75 47.41 COUNCIL COOKIES, ETC~ .............. 0~4'020-412~' 47.41 JRNL-CD 1010 47.41 165.00 JRNL-CD 1010 1_,.~_5-.~__0~6-00 REDE-V-E~OP--PJ~JEC~ #& ...... 55-5880-3106 1,~05.70 JRNL-CD iOlO ......... 9_9_~.J1~ O~-nO ~AINSTRE~T EP-D- ................ 55-588~-310~ - 99.00 JRNL-CD IOlO 06~0_.~[LU~LU~..HARO~ARg ....... 55-5861-3100 1010 ................................. 4~46B~51 7/25/00 7/25/00 4,468.51 JRNL-CD 33Z 4_ 2_-L ............................. _1_56~.g fl ___g 5~0 D_Y_[IR O PI~i~S_HPE VEt DP ME NI 7/25/00 7~25~00 154.00 JRNL-CD 55-5054-310G 1010 01-4110-3100 lblO ........................... 8BO._BO___ ~6~00 CD~EuNIT~_£LNTER CLAIM 7/25/00 7/25/00 g80.80 JRNL-CD ........................... 120~L~mrP_D~.~R£~I_YA.C_.BRRI.~ LANE 01-4260-3100 7/25/00 7/23/00 120.00 JRNL-CD 1010 33747-5 33747-~ .............................. i,_A£_£~00__0.6_-%L0 _U P_E~_.~SP A f_E _ E L E C IJ-O N ....... 01-4110-3100 PAGE 19 P U R C h A S E J 0 U R N A L ^P-CU2-O1 CiTY OF MOUND VENDOR 1NVOICE DUE HOLD PRE NO. INVOICE NM~R DATE _DA-TE ~TJ},T-U$----ANOUNT DE.$CRIPTIO;t ~ACCOU.NT NUilo£R - A 7~25~00 7/25/00 1,488.00 33753-A 1,635.80 7/Z5/OU 7/25/00 1,635.50 33753-~ 1,045.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 1,045.00 33753-C 33753-2 33753-E 33753-F KENNEDY ~ GRAVEN 241.50 7/25/00 7/25/00 241.50 569.80 7/25/00 7/25/00 569.&0 426.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 420.00 96.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 96.00 JRNL-CD lOlO 06-00 EXECUTIVE 01-4110-3100 JRNL-C~ 1010 06-00 ADMINISTRATIVE Oi-4iiO-3iO0 VENDOR TOTAL 13195.i1 JRNL-CD 1010 06-00 PUGLIC SAFETY 01-4110-3100 JR~L-CD 1010 06-00 PUBLIC WORKS 01-4280-3100 JRNL-CD 1010 06-00 PLA~NIKG AND ZONING 01-4190-3100 JPNL-CD 1010 06-00 PA~K AND RECREATION 01-4340-~100 JRNL-CD t010 1277d 7/25/00 7/25/00 .... 4.,054_29 3RD ~R-~O~--L~VY ~AYJ4EN-T~ ............. 0&-4020-4i30 4,054.29 dONL-CD 10]0 ]_AKF MINNFTONAK CONVFR~ATI VENDOR TOTAL L2785 3101mO 7/2S/fl0 7/25/00 49~.18 PROPANE FOR TRAINING PURPOSE 22-4170-4110 494.i8 JR~ .... t01~ LAKES GAS COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 494.18 L2~lO 3546~ 7/25/00 7/25/00 301.31 OIL LIGHT SEAT BAR/FILTERS 01-4340-3820 301.31 JRNL-CD 1010 LANO ENUIPME.~T INC L28ii 11023 ___ L.ARSON PRINTING L2822 1349172 VENDOR TOTAL 7/25/00 7/25/00 GRA_~H, IC% VFNr)~R_I_QiA~ 301.31 _._2~8~=!6---£~VE.LD~_.-S~ ................................ 22-4170-3500 184.16 JR:4L-CD 1010 154-.$6 119.22 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 01-4280-2250 ......... 119~2..~._M~ISCE~L~E~S-~-T~S .................. Z3-7300-2250 · 119.22 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS 75-7800-2250 7/25/00 7/25/00 357.66 JRNL-CD 1010 LA~SON P~<ODUCTS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 357.06 7~25~00 7~25~00 11.20 JRNL-CD .... Z7~4_ ................................ £ 32~-10 ~-~ 3--OZ) -.QE~_ I VERX- -C HARG ES 7125/00 7/25/00 132.10 JRNL-CD ZZZ~5 ...................................... ~i. ZO 05-~26-OG.-D~LIVJ~RY CHARGES .. 71-7100-g600 1010 71-7100-9600 1010 7t-7t00-9600 PAGE '~1 P b R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-Oi CITY OF ~".3UNg VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE- ---~4I-2 ........ OAJ£ SIA-T4J $.- A~ I---DE-8£-a ~:I- t~ ............... ACCOUNT NUMBER AM 7/25/00 7/25/00 21.70 JRNL-CD 77v7 lg2.00 0~-29-u0 DELIVERY CHARGES 7/25/00 7/25/00 182.00 JPNL-CD 7810 32.Z0 07-03-00 DELIVERY CHARGES 7125100 7/25/00 32.20 J~NL-CD 1010 71-7100-9600 1010 71-7100-9600 1010 783o 61.6~ 7/25/00 7/25/00 61.§0 7840 i3.30 07-I0-00 7/25/00 7/25/00 13.30 JRNL-CD 7854-A i71.50 07-13-00 ?/25/00 7/25/00 171.50 JRNL-CD 7564-B 25.00 07-13-00 7/25/00 7/25/00 25.00 JRNL-CD 07-07-00 9ELIVERY CHARGES 71-7100-9600 JRNL-CD 1010 DELIVERY CHARGES 71-7100-9600 1010 9[LIVERY CHARGES 71-7100-9600 1010 HANDLING CHARGE 71-7100-9600 1010 ~ARLIN'S TRUCKING VENDOR TOTAL 650.60 M~O~n ~6~33___ 1~,~9~10 BEER 7/25/00 7/25t00 1,989.10 JRNL-CD 71-7100-9530 ....... 1010 171017 3~A7.9~BEER 7/25/00 7/25/00 3,847.95 JRNL-CD ........ 7~-7t00-9530 ......... 1010 o2~00 ~EER 7/25/00 7/25/00 92.00 JRNL-CD ................ 71-7100-9530 ....... 1010 17~959 2,732.10 BEER ..... 71-7100-9530 7/25/00 7/25/00 2,732.10 JRNL-C[) 1010 v :'. Ni~Q_R_ T 0 T A.L ..... ~6-%.-.1. 5 ~3080 33610 102.00 06-00 SEAL COAT PROJECT 27-5800-3100 iii2.00 JRNL-~O ...................... 1010 - 3361i 180.00 06-00 WESTEDGE ENGINEERING 01-42g0-3100 .... t010 -- 33612 45.00 0~-00 NORWOOD LANE ENGINEERING 01-2300-106o ........................ 7/25/$Q _TY23J_OJ~ ........ AS_OO--¢NL~CD .......................... 1010 33015 90.00 06-00 DELI:~OUENT ASSESSMENTS 01-4090-3100 .............. ZI_2~i_O~__~I~_~I~gO ............ 9~g~O- J~L ~C~ ............................ ~_010 33614 1,100.40 06-00 ~LDG/INSPECTIONS ENGINEE 01-4190-3100 ...................... ZJ_2_6J~_ O 0 __ 7J_25J g g ....... 1~ 1~0.40 ~R ~L --Cb ................ 1010 33515 270.00 06-00 PLANING/ZONING ENGINEERI ..................... 7J~__SJJ].~ .... 7/2~5J~ O -- 2 7-~L. JiO .- -JR -~L--C J~ 33616 270.00 06-00 STREETS ENGINEERING .......... 71_ZSJgO_ 772~5./00 ....... 270~0~.. J~$L-Cg' - - 01-4190-3100 1010 01-4280-3100 1010 r~AGE 12 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-CG2-O1 CITY DF HOUND CENDd& IHvOICE 2, UE HOLD PRE-. _~g iNZ0~C~-~5~--- ~A~TZ ..... DAIg---ST~TUS -A~OUNI ~ESCRIPTt~4 ACCOUNT NUMBER AM 7/25/00 7/25/00 22.50 JRNL-CD ...... }3~17~ ........................................ 2.2~5g .... O~O0-.-FS~-_~SR-[~GI~EERtNG 7/25/00 7/25/00 22.50 J~NL-CD ....... 33a&2 ................................. -9g. Oa ~6--O0~RK~- DBP]r-E~JGINE~J~tNG 7/25/00 7/25/00 90.00 JP;qL-CD _. 33o2-0 33622 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 73-7300-3100 1010 76-7800-3100 1010 01-4340-3t00 101o -----49J~SO---~LO AUDI/~D-F~S.~OAO~$AP ........ 20-5700-3100 499.50 JRNL-CD 1010 315.00 JRNL-CD 1010 2,585.65 JRNL-CD 1010 45 _OO- 06 ,.OXk _.Lg JgN -~T,~qANJ- -P~P~-OGR A M -~I -I ........ 78-7800-3100 45.00 JRNL-CD 1010 2/-0=00 06-00 STORM ~ATEJR--LLTJ:L~J-Y O1-4i9o-3100 7/25/00 7/25/00 270.00 JRNL-CD 1010 7/25/00 7/25/00 ~3624 7/25/00 7/25/00 4.5.00 06-00 SOUTH-,,RAUNDERS LAKE ....... 7~-7300-3t00 ........ 45.00 JRNL-CD 1010 4~0-0 06-00 GRADING~t~-~4R-~i-~4,1D~I~4Jt .......... 0t-23~0-t096 ........ 496.00 JRNL-CD 1010 180_00 --o$~m~e~)-mJ~ASN~ NG!NEgR4NG .... ~t~2300-t096 7/25/0~ 7/25/00 180.00 JPNL-CD 1010 ........ -- 135.00 0~-00 LOST LAKE ENG~J~IJ~G 30~5640-3i00 7/25/00 7/25/00 135.00 JRNL-CD 1010 _33622 ............. ?,95ri.tiff f16-O0 COUNTY ROAD~5-~£&OCA-IJg-- . .2-6--5700-3100 7/25/00 7/25/00 2,950.00 JPNL-CD 1010 33279 ....................................... 3~5~Q~ fl6-Afl TIF DISTaALCJ~i_NE£~P~ING .... 55--5880-3100 . 7125100 7~25~00 ?15.00 JRNL-CD 1010 _. 33'230 ................................... 937.5~__0C-00 IRIj£_.VJkLLLE£N~INZEILI~ . 55-5883-3100 7/25/00 7/25/00 937.50 JRNL-CD 1010 53u 3_1_ ............................ 7/25/00 7/25/00 1,_lhg..&~___Qb-OO 5212 1,184.40 JRNL-£D 1010 3303~2_ ..................................... A15~?.D .... O~-D&.~ROUADNAI3__R__CONIAiNMENI 01-2300-1089 7/25/00 7/25/00 415.20 JRNL-fD 1010 7/25/00 7/25/00 957~5~__O~-Oo~LZDRS~RD~3.~NGiNEERI~ ..... 55-5883-3100 937.50 JRNL-CD 1010 A]Q~]I__~£-00 F~LE_N_Id3ES__RRZIP_E_RIJ__ENCIN£[__ 0i-2300-1095 PAGE AP-C02-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF HOUND VENDuR I~VOlC£ DUE HOLD 7/25/00 7/25/00 610.50 JRNL-CD ................... ACCOU.';T NuMbER 1010 PRE- AM _53035 1,837.70 05-00 REx AL~Iq PROPERTY ENG1N 01-2300-1095 7/25/0~ 7/25/00 1,837.70 J;< :;L-CD 1010 45.00 06-00 SENIOR CENTER ENGINEERIN 01-2300-1088 33~36 7/25/00 7/25/00 45.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ..... 33u37 45.00 06-00 L'~EYqEIS PROPERTY ENGINEE 01-2300-1099 7/25/00 7~25/00 45.00 JRNL-CD 1010 3363~; 135.00 Ofl-O0 GUBRUD PROPERTY ENGINEER 01-2300-1091 ?/25/00 7/25/00 135.00 JRNL-CD 1010 33039 349.50 06-00 POST OFFICE ENGINEERING 55-5580-3100 7/25/00 7/25/00 349.50 JRNL-CD lOlO 33640 i35.00 06-00 CHESTNUT HILL/BRENSHELL 01-4190-3100 7/25/00 7/25/00 135.00 JRNL-CD lOlO 33641 I95.30 06-00 HUFNAGLE SUB-DIVISION 01-2300-1100 7/25/00 7/25/00 I95.30 JRNL-CD 1010 MCCOHBS FRANK ROOS A$SOCI~ VENDOR TOTAL 17254.15 :i317~0 _ O]).f~/)~v~]Y~S2~ .............. 2_9~,~ 2rg~/:~L-- ~:%8 ,-.]D-O ~ A STC~A-T-E R ........... 78-7800-4230 7/25/00 7/25/00 29,~28.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ..... 0 D ,9~5_3 D .......... ~5 .~/,,-,-OO--~- 00 S A C-~ARGE-S ............... 7~-2304-.0000 .- 7/25/00 7/25/00 6,534.00 JRNL-CD 1010 .,q ETA.C] P~31_I_TA t~L ]ZDU.N CA L~t,~ ~/]..~__3/.CC N D fl R T n T A/. ...... 36-~2 q3171 009710 575.00 05-00 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 01-4190-3100 ..................................... ~3.Y~5~-0-0 06-00 5U~-LrDING !44~-£~T~ON$ .......... 01-4190-3.100 7/25/00 7/25100 1,750.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ~;3250 UOU730 41.74 05-16-00 THRU 06-19-00 01-4340-3720 ............................................ 64 _ 63---~L5 ---i~J)-O--..%-H R tJ 0 &~ 1.~-~) O- ........... 0t-4340-3720 - 15.9~ 05-15-00 THRU 06-'19-00 71-7100-3720 77.07 05-15-00 TmRU 06-19-00 22-4170-3720 24.41 05-15-00 THRU 06-19-00 01-4280-3720 13.b7 05-i5-00 IHRU 06-19-00 73-7300-3720 7/25/00 7125/00 643.58 JRRL-CD 1010 :"L1 L~NZ. G AS£ [J ................ ¥ E_NDOJ~ _TOTAL ....... ~43~8 ~!3320 POTM;,;02713 030.00 APKIL ~AY JUN[ 2000 CJON CHAkG 01-4140-3800 'IN DEPT OF PU~SLIC SAFETY VENDOR TOTAL 630.00 PAGE Z4 P U F:, C H A S E J L' U P, N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF HOUND YE F, JUR INVOICL DUE HOLrl PRE- ...... NO- IN¥4~i.(~E--J'.~H~C----~.~ATE ...... DA~-F~ .....S-T~-D --~$--~-~C~IPTIDN ................. AC-COUNT NUHBER A~ M3330 000706 200.00 CONFERENCE ALEXANDRA SEP 20-22 01-4090-4110 ........ JJ~-5/.~--~-Z-2 ~.0 .............. ~.O~ ..60---~ ............. 1010 MINNESOTA GFUA VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 M3611 0502 71.93 ROLL RITE TARP 01-4280-2300 7/25/00 7/25/00 71.93 JRNL-CD 1010 >~IT-TOWN BODY AND TRDCK P* VENDOR TOTAL 71.93 ~AhO 0~[1703 7~25/00 ....................... ~-1-~-0-- 7/25/00 210.00 iIA_TL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN v[r~IA'ITJLL 210.00 A N ,k U A L- ~-~G-E~ S~-]q-P~EN E-wA b ............ 22 -4170 -4 t 3 O JRNL-CD 1010 N380U 000731 NORTHERN 1,428.91 06-00 2245-301-939 01-4320-3710 ........................................... ~l--$$---JJY~---O-Or~--~-~-2-~ ................... 01-4150-37t0- 571.71 3,039.9i .... 655.16 227.76 125.87 7/25/00 7/25/00 STATES POWER CO VENDON TOTAL 125.86 1,470.26 ~4.55 5,077.63 13,235.48 13235.48 06-00 06-00 06-00 06-00 06-00 06~00 06-00 06-00 06 -X%0 -OJ~604 - 835 06-00 JRNL-CD i914-601-425 71-7100-3710 0217-606-329 73-7300-3710 2-1-8~J+0~-~4-7 ................ 22-4t70-3710 0047-005-229 01-4340-3710 0~64-508-832 01-4280-3710 0864-508-~g~2 ........... 7~-7300-37t0. 0864-508-832 78-7800-3710 0018-802-634 78-7800-3710 ........ 01--4280-37t0 01-4280-3710 1010 N3111-0_5/}~490 B 7/25/00 7/25/00 :,iCLP~T~dFRN WATFR J,LjF, J;,_.% SUP~. VF,':DOR TOTAJ.. 82-.g0--~] ~CE-bLANE-OUS ~-]'-EJ~-$ ...................... 73 - 7300 - 2300 - 82.00 JRNL-CD 1010 03,561 102024~76-00 ...................... ~-/~$ / 00 ~-2~ 00 OFFICE MAX, INC. VENDOR TOTAL P3957 1109950 7/25/00 7/25/00 PAM COHPANIES VENDOR TOTAL 172.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 22-4170-2100 i~-.~S4---JRNI_ -rS ........... t 0 t 0 172.84 75.71 AIR FILTEm 01-4280-2310 75.71 JRNL-CD lOlO 75.71 ............. 2-1.5 ~:~%- -4'4]-,~ TAXASLE ...................... 7/25/00 7/25/00 215.68 JRNL-CD 7/25/00 7/25/00 66.24 JRNL-CD 7t-7t00-9540 - lOlO 71-7100-Q540 lOlu P4005 1238 30.00 ADD GROMETS TO TARP 01-4280-2310 1010 PAGE i5 P U R C it A S f J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-01 CiTY OF HOUND VENDUa INvoIcE DUE HOL.r) -NLI~_ J!'IVOI.C~N~C..~_ J%AI~ .... OA3-E- $-TCJUS ...... AMOLtNI.-43ES-Ci-;.t~3tON ............. ACCOUNT NUHtsER P4021 625708 536.70 LI ,gUOR .......... Z/-2.-57~0.O---7v'2 .%/-04) ........ 53~r24)---~IRNL-C-D 623709 f~35.55 ,~INE Z~ 2-5-/J~0 -- Z/~:%/J~O- ....... 835 ..55.---JP-N& -G-D--- 025474 90.00 NIX PHILLIPS WINE g SPIRITS, * VENDOR TOTAL 1462.25 P403~ 32391 747.20 CIGARETTES 7/25/00 7/25/00 747.20 J~NL-CD 32393 i56.25 CIGARS 7/25/00 7/25/00 i56.25 JRNL-CD 32~33 31.95 MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 7/25/00 7/25/00 31.95 J~NL-CD 32034 9~4.03 CIGARETTES 7/25/00 7/25/00 914.03 JRNL-CD PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING VENDOR TOTAL '~4171 gS1777-]~ 8523 S_~O~ 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 7/25/00 71-7100-9510 1GtO 71-7100-9520 t010 71-7100-0540 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 852846-J~ 7/25/00 7/25/00 85482~-90 ....................... ~L~]2~31 7/25/00 7/25/00 1,379.3I 1B49.43 5J~9- 76 -~J~LE ..... 7i-71~0-95~0 519.76 JRNL-CD iOlO .L~O8: 45 _],,Li N E ........... 71-7t00-9520- 1,698.45 J~NL-CD lO1O -__~91.33 LI~UOR .................. F1-7100-95t0 .... 1,391.33 JRNL-CD 1010 t3~ LIaR .......... 71-7100-~5]O 330.4~ JRNL-CD 1~10 ._~ f~HOR ................ 71-7100-9510~ JRNL-CD !0lO ..... _~90_ ............... 164~l___MLA_ ........................ 71-7100-9540 7/~5/00 ?/25/00 164.~1 J~NL-CD 1010 ~54~5_&~ ............................. 4~J22~A3~_ IJUOR 7/25/00 7/25/00 4,322.13 JRNL-CD 21-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9510 lO10 .................. 10.80_ LI;U~R 7125100 7125/00 10.~0 JRNL-C9 ........................ 1,Ag~.~O _ ~I}~£ .......................... 71-7100-9520 7/25/06 7/25/00 1,499.80 JRNL-CD 1010 PAGE t6 AP-Cu2-O1 P u k C H A S E J O U R N A L CITY OF MquND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD Pq[ __N~.__J~L~O~__~NP~R__~AT~ O~I~-~-T&IJJ~q ...... AMOUJ4T---~EGGR. t¢-T~GN .................. ACCOUNT NdN~ER- A~ R4250 474917 7/25/00 7/25/00 32.50 JRNL-CD lOlO .............................. ~.-70 -O6-2-&-OO--DELtV~RY SERVICE 7/25/00 7/25/00 8.70 JRNL-CD 55-58~0-3100 1010 67u80 67919 68213 68547 RON'S ICE COMPANY R4300 OOu701 188.02 ICE -- 7/gS/O0 7/~-5~00 ............ I¢.g~eZ---JRNL-CD lgl.84 ICE 7 / 2-5_/X)%L--~ 25 / 00 _ _~J-2S / n 0 --Z/25 / 00 VENDOR TOTAL 7/25/00 7/25/00 71-7100-~550 t010 71-7100-9550 10t0 71-7100-9550 ..................... tOtO 65.74 ICE 71-7100-9550 6~.74-~J ~Pc~L--~ ....................... 10t0 - 200.00 ICE 71-7100-9550 ~O_Oa~-L--CD ........................... ioio - 804.00 22~.50 JULY AUG SEPT 2000 DUES 01-4140-4120 224.50 J~NL-CD iOlO ROTARY CLUB oF MOUND VENDOR TOTAL q4~90 7/25/00 7/25/00 224.50 2,576.64 08-00 L~- ~tO R~;~E~I'¢--A C E ....... 7t-.7100-392~) ...... JRNL-CD 1010 -$ H ~)R F I I'~F S4391 2828 v,Z~¢OR Tn_EM_ ----~--576_64 ........ 889.73 COMBERLAND TREE REMOVAL 01-4340-5110 Z_/_2-5~- 0-0 -- 7Y~5~ ........... ~9~-JP~ -~ ............................. i0 10 --- SHOREWUUD TREE SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 889.73 54448 000725 325.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 325.00 bPORIING ~EED KENNELS VENDOR TOTAL 325.00 ~ &&~_~ _102122_ ................................. ~.5_ 34 7/25/00 7/25/00 15.34 08-00 DOG KENNEL FEES 01-4140-4270 JRNL-CD 1010 M I S C~_J~4. A N EO~U ~- -J)~AR I$ ..... 73-7300-2310 - JRqL-CD 1010 ~]'~,~_- w E R I_£W~rS V.7/}L DS~ ¥ E ~¢,D 0£.; IOIAL - .. 15.64 ............. 54580 5978 70.00 LOCATE WIRE TRUE VALUE LOT 3J~57~-- _Z/2 ~OO .......... 3~.~-~L ~C~ .................. 01-4280-3710 1010 STERNE ELECTRIC CO VENDOR TOTAL 70.00 PAGE 17 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-Oi CITY ElF MOUND VENDOR II;VOICE DUE HOLD __NS. 1%.v..b ! CE _NM4;R -DAZE -- JATJ;- -$-TATNS S~605 205950 2,785.58 THRU 06-17-00 POST OFFICE SERV ACCOUNT NON,ER 55-5880-3100 10t0 STS CONSdLTA;~TS LT~ VLNDJE TOTAL 27E5.5S T4730 i07 39.32 STREET EASEMENT/VACATION 01-2300-1089 7/25/00 7/25/00 39.32 JRNL-CD iOiO 109 37.45 REZONE SENiO~ CENTER 01-2300-108~ ?/25/00 7/25/00 37.45 JRNL-CD 1010 liO 46.82 REZONE 1800 CO~MERCE 01-2300-1092 7/25/00 7/25/00 46.82 J~NL-CD 1010 ~HE LAKEK VEL~DOE TOTAL i23.59 PRE' A~ I~ZG~i~ 2 ~ 72 ........................... ZO ~ .~O---H E~- -:J-A.N ~J:~.~ AD -~4~ ................. 7Z-7100-3500 ...... 7/25/00 7/25/00 107.60 JRNL-CD 1010 7_/2S_/Jlb_~_/2 5/-0~} 399.00 BEER 71-7100-9530 $99.~00---JRNL-~-D ........................... ~010 - THF L A K E R/P IJ~J~E.[_~_ T4770 169620 282.00 BEER 71-7100-9530 22~-2~) 0 JP.-NL--X[~). .................................... t 010 965.25 BEER 71-7100-9530 .......... iL6 S-..2~-. ~J.P. N L~f..4) ............................... 10t~) - 170062 19d097 19~162 60.50 MISCELLANEOUS 71-7100-9550 ............ ~Y~S2Zt~-.-Z/~-2~5~D- ............. A..~50---~L~J._~ .......... 10t0 71-7100-9530 ....................... 71-7100-9530 ............. 10!0- 196103 5,956.85 BEER 198164 375.00 BEER 199000 171.20 t~ISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 3~.5.~__3~A2~.ZO~ ..... ~-7&-~2~-~Ra4L~CD .............. t010-- 199001 5,812.60 BEER 71-7100-o530 ................... Z125 i Oi~_ ~_12$ l. O O .......... ~12~--.--~W1..~£ D ..................... 10t0 THORPE DISIRIRUTING COMPAN V~NDO[~ TOTAL 15022.40 T4780 501689 19.51 MISCELLANEOUS NAME TAGS 01-4320-2200 7:=5/00 7/2:/0o :9.51 ~,~.-cD 10:0 ........................... 12B-£&--OB-20-~-~&-ANNI~G-:~-ET. ING __ . 0i-4190-4200 395.00 06-27-00 CITY COUNCIL/HRA 01-4020-4200 7/25/00 7/25/00 523.50 JRNL-CD lOlO PAGE i8 ? O R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AF-C32-O1 CITY OF HOL'ND VENDOR INVU1CE hUE HOLD .... N3= JN¥O-~F.~2--JCM~-~. .... $AI£ DATE--$3AIJJ$---- A~OU~I--~E$C~jPJ-tg~N- TIME SAVER OFF SITE SECRE$ VENbOR TOTAL 523.50 T4525 O~tlJA 298.88 CLEANING qF 7/25/00 7/25/00 298.6~ J~NL-CD TMb CONSULTING, INC. VENDO~ TOTAL 298.88 ACCOUNT NUMBER ~P PRINTER 01-~095-380u 1010 PRE T&961 21&~5~$ 4-9~.89 PLEATED 7/25/00 7/25/00 497.~9 JRNL-CD FILTERS ..... 01-4320-3830 1010 T4965 25U35 I47.92 -3-J'25/00 ~&2-5-/~ ~3~7~92 THYSaEN LAGER~UIST ELEVATO VENDOR TOTAL I47.92 07-00 ELEVATOR SERVICE JRNL-CD --- 01-4320-4200 ................... t~t0 T4785 261879-0 92.4i OFFICE SUPPLIES 7/25/00 7/25/00 92.4i JRNL-CD 262712-1 i55.43 FABRIC ~OAKD 7/25/00 7/25/00 i58.43 J~NL-CD 2627i~-0 30.16 FILTER, ETC 7/25/00 7/25/00 30.i6 JRNL-CD 263105-0 7/25/00 2631~5 7/25/00 ~WIN CiTY 7/25/00 8.13 ZISCELLANEOUS OFFICE 8.13 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE 8.13 8.i3 22-4170-2200 1010 01-4320-2200 1010 01-4040-2200 1010 SUPPLIES 01-4040-2200 SUPPLIES 01-4090-2200 MISCELLANEOUS OFFL~-E~SJJ~&4-E$ ....... 0t-4t40-220~ MISCELLANEOUS OFF,CE SUPPLIES 01-4190-2200 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4340-2200 2:TL~SCELLANEOUS OFE~CJ~ SU~-P-LIJ~$-- ~01-42-&0-2200 2.71 4.07 4_~17 72.63 126.84 36.37 7/25/00 30.37 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 71-7100-2200 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 73-7300-2200 MIqFELLANEOUS OFFICE SLL~P~j.E~ -- 2~7~00-~0~ MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4020-2200 JRNL-CD iOiO MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4040-2200 JRNL-£D 1010 OFFICE SUPPLY CO VENDOR TOTAL 444.21 .................................................. 2 ~L. 75___ S H_I. SLI_.. A I I nJ.'.M~ £EJNLDEN.~ _ .S C 011. 22-4170-2200 .... ?125100 7~25/00 2z..75 JRNL-CD 1010 ....................................... 2Z~_5~_ _ SH 1P~I _A!_LP, WANC£_ BE_~ENL,. BP. iAN _ 22-4170-2200. . . 7/25/00 7/25/00 27.50 JRNL-CD 1010 O.k] EI~fG~ S_U NL L ~13.F_D ......... VZA'DD~___10 TAL ........ ~2-25 ............................. d5102 000725 31.95 08-00 BALBOA PARKING 01-4280-4200 ...................................... JJ.~9_S__~v~__hAL~DA_~A_RX~ NG .......... 73-7300-4200 31.95 Og-O0 BALBOA PARKING 7b-7800-4200 7/25/00 7/25/00 95.85 JRNL-CD 1010 PAGE 19 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF NOUND VENDuR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. iN¥-OLC~-44M~[~- --D~T~.- ~ rC~T~ _$II:~,TcLI.$____ A~OJ~I4-'r.~f~.~C-~4~T~_i-~94~ ..................... ACCuUNT NUMP, ER UNITED PROPERTIES VENDOR TOTAL 95.85 0513;) 00d71~ 160.00 CLERK ACADEHY JLILY 27-28,2000 01-4040-4110 ?/25/00 7/25/00 160.00 JRNL-CD 1010 UNIVERSITY OF HN REGISTRAR VENDOR TOTAL 160.00 _-~5 ~ 4.5 J~ g_81~2-? ................................ -14~.~0 -- ~f~-- ~Z -~0- q4 R.A--. ~-E~ ~ ~ .......... 01-4030-3Z00 7125/00 7/25/00 10.00 JRNL-CD lOlO d5571 27F14 41.35 ___ 7 / 25 / 0~_7~.~ &2~ 35 wESTONKA MECHANICAL COuTR$ VENDOE TOTAL 42.35 W5630 34~7 560.00 7/25/00 7/25/00 560.00 NIDMER ]NC VENDOR TOTAL 560.00 VACUUM 9REAKER SILLCOCK JR N~---ugg 7~-7800-2330 ..... 1010 ..... 06-20-00 BACKHOE AND LABOR 78-7800-3~00 JRNL-CD 1010 · /5690 22'~22 5.1.4.78 06-22--00 CONC-P-~-T~E 7~25~00 7~25~00 514.78 JRNL-CD lOiO _WM MUFII FR F-..q(hN% VEND.fiR ~3~Z_~J. ~5~4.78 26700 000703 FIRE ENGINEERING 26701 000705 39.95 RENEWAL TWO YEARS 22-4170-4130 7/?s/0fl 7/75/fl0 39.95 JRNL-CD VENDOR TOTAL 39.95 75.00 DEPOT RENTAL REFUND 0Z-3820-0000 7/25/00 7/25/00 75.00 JRNL-CD lOlO 75.00 -- 220.76 AUTO ~a~CCIDENT ........... 01-4340-361-0 ......... 7/2S/00 7/25/00 220.76 JRNL-CD 1010 VENDOR__I~ ...... 220.76 71.00 PUBLIC UTILITY GIS NARS 78-7800-3100 7125/IL0_~7~ 5/00 21.00 JRNb~ tOlO VENDOF: TOTAL 71.00 CARLSON, ~E~-~ ................ ~'NDOR TOTAL 76702 2g2774 _ MCMURRIN. .IFFF 26703 000707 LAKE M1N4EIONKA AREA 26704 0119922 280.46 MPLS COLE DIRECTORY 01-4140-2100 7/25/06 7/25/00 280.46 JRNL-CD 1010 COLE DIRECTORY VENDOR TOTAL 280.46 Z/25/0:3 7125/00 95.31 JRNL-CD 1010 GQSHAN..~.D .......... N£NDDR IDIAL ..... 95.~1 PA,oE JO P U i C H ,~ S E J 0 L: P ~ A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MqdNL, VENDOR INVOICE hUE HOLD PRF _ND~_i~,'Oi~.Z._~'~:~._5~ ...... DAIF. .... D-AI£__...g_T.ATUS AMJUN]-- DESCJ~J?ffIO~4 ........ ACCOUi, T N~JMGER A 5.13 REFUND ?ASED ON GARAGE SITE .SO REFUND ~:ASED 0~ 6A~A6~ SITE ................. ~Y2S~_QO _ZY~S~uQ -- -- 21.13 - JR.'~L-C~ ......... KARGEL, GEROLD A. VERDOR TOTAL 21.13 01-3251-0000 01-3253-0000 01-2222-0000 1010 Help us Build Zero Gravity Skate Park What we need: land money in-kind donations Land: water fountain port-o-potties Shade available (no bugs) phone near by not too close to traffic near stuff to buy (food, drink etc.) Money: $100,000. We will be fund raising, some ideas so far- -sell ads located at the park, on sign · cash requests · money jars around town · model and request for funds around town We will be presenting to other groups- .Jaycees .Lions · American Legion · Area Cities and Park commissions In-kind donations: Lots of concrete Concrete pumping Excavation Rebar #3 Gravel - 3/4 minus Lumber - 2X4 and 4X4 Coping 3~ CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (6~2) 472-0620 July 14, 2000 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Memorandum Mayor/City Council ~ ~;o[~mkel~'tPoa~eD~;;t~rop~nSp~ce Advisory Commission. Two applicants for the one vacant POSAC term were interviewed at the July 13, 2000 meeting. From the interviews the POSAC is recommending Schelly Young be appointed to complete the term of Christina Cooper that ends December 2000. Attachments: Letter/Resume printed on recycled paper July 4, 2000 Park and Open Space Advisory Commission 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Park Commission, I am interested in serving on the Park and Open Space Advisory Commission. I feel strongly about the Mound community and it's wonderful setting of parks, lakes and recreation. I would enjoy the oppommity to be able to serve the Mound community in this way. I have always enjoyed parks and nature all of my life. I worked for the Youth Conservation Corps as a young adult. This was a US Forest Service program that employed youth to maintain trails, construct fire breaks, maintain and upkeep of the forest parks. I also worked for the Santa Barbara, California Parks Department as a park maintenance worker for 2 years maintaining the pristine beach parks of the Santa Barbara area. I have studied om/thology at the University of Minnesota as a hobby, since I have found the wonderful migration of birds in this State incredible! I have been living in Mound for almost 7 years and I have also been working for the Toro Company since I moved here. ! started with Toro here at the Mound plant and have been working at the corporate office in Bloomington for 4 years or so. I choose to commute because I maly have found my home here in Mound and I never want to leave! In addition to my passion for the outdoors, I also understand the need for impartiality when considering the needs of the community ag a whole, and I have strong skills in this I look forward to speaking with you at the interview. Sincerely, Schelly L. Young 6190 Red Oak Rd. Mound, MN 55364 472-6276 Core Team Member, Assembly Line, Mound, 1993-1994 · Et~iciently and accurately assembled parts for Toro's electrical hand-held consumer product line. · Provided quality audits, inventory control and parts accountability staying productive in highly pressured environment. HIGmAND HOSPITAL, Oakland, CA - 1991 Cardiology Technician lnternsMp in routine and emergency environmentx ADEPT PAINTING AND IXICKS, Oakland and San Jose, CA 1956 - 1990 Lock Technician/Paint Technician GOLDEN GATE KEY AND LOCK, Oakland, CA 1984 - 1956 Lock Technician City of Santa Barbara Parks Department, Santa Barbara, CA 1981 - 198.3 Park Maintenance W'ork~ I US Forest Service, Santa Barbara County, CA 1979 - 1980 Youth Conservation Corp. EDUCA~ON / · Cerfi:fieates, Motorcycle Technician Program (975 Horns), Harley-Davidson Early Model Elective (150Hours) and Harley-Davidson Factory Elective (300Hours), Motorcycle Mechanics Institute, Phoenix, AZ, April, 1992-August, 1993 · Certified Cardiology Technician (600 Hours), Loma Vista Education Center, Concord, CA, 1991 · G~e~l Studies coursework, Lan~ College, Oakland, CA, 1988-1989 · Certified Locksmith Technician (400 Hours), Goldea Crate School of Lock Technology, Oakland, CA, 1984 Mound City Code Section 155.00 Section 155 - The Council Section 155:00. Meetint,~. Sub& 1. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Council shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each calendar month at 7:30 P.M. Any regular meeting falling upon a holiday shall be held on the next following business day at the same time and place. All meetings, including special and adjourned meetings, shall be held in the City Hall. Subd. 2. Special Meetings. The Mayor or any two members of the Council may call a special meeting of the Council upon at least 24 hours written notice to each member of the Council. This notice shall be delivered personally to each member and shall be left at Ms/her usual place of residence with some responsible person. Similar notice shall be given to the official newspaper of the City, and a copy shall be posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall. Subd. 3. Initial Meeting,. At the first regular Council meeting in January of each year, the Council shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) Designate the depositories of City funds; Designate the official newspaper; Choose one of the Council members as Acting Mayor, who shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the disability or absence of the Mayor from the City or, in case of a vacancy in the office of Mayor, until a successor has been appointed and qualifies; Appoint such officers and employees and such members of boards, commissions, and committees as may be necessary. Subd. 4. Public Meetings. All Council meetings, including special and adjourned meetings and meetings of Council committees, shall be open to the public. Section 155:05. Presiding Officer. Subd. 1. Who Presides. The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the Council. In the absence of the Mayor, the Acting Mayor shall preside. In the absence of both, the Clerk shall call the meeting to order and shall preside until the Council members present at the meeting choose one of their number to act temporarily as presiding officer. 8-29-94 Mound City Code Section 155:10 Subs. :2. Procedure. The presiding officer shall preserve order, enforce the rules of procedure herein prescribed, and determine without debate, subject to final decision of the Council on appeal, all questions of procedure and order. Except as otherwise provided by statute or by these rules, the proceedings of the Council shall be conducted in accordance with Robert's Rules of Order, Revised. Subd. 3. Appeal Procedure. Any member may appeal to the Council from a ruling of the presiding officer. If the appeal is seconded, the member may speak once solely on the question involved and the presiding officer may explain his/her ruling, but no other Council member shall participate in the discussion. The appeal shall be sustained if it is approved by a majority of the members present exclusive of the presiding officer. Subd. 4. Rights of Presiding Officer. The presiding officer may make motions, second motions, or speak on any question except that on demand of any Council member he/she shall vacate the chair and designate a Council member to preside temporarily. Section 155:10. Minutes. Subd. 1. Who Keeps. Minutes of each Council Meeting shall be kept by the Clerk or, in his or her absence, by the Deputy Clerk. In the absence of both, the presiding officer shall appoint a secretary pro tern. Ordinances, resolutions, and claims need not be recorded in full in the minutes if they appear in other permanent records of the Clerk and can be accurately identified from the description given in the minutes. Subd. 2. Approval. The minutes of each meeting shall be reduced to typewritten form, shall be signed by the Clerk, and copies thereof shall be delivered to each Council member as soon as practicable after the meeting. At the next regular Council meeting following such delivery, approval of the minutes shall be considered by the Council. The minutes need not be read aloud, but the presiding officer shall call for any additions or corrections. If there is no objection to a proposed addition or correction, it may be made without a vote of the Council. If there is an objection, the Council shall vote upon the addition or correction. If there are no additions or corrections, the minutes shall stand approved. Section 155:15. Order of Business. Subd. 1. Order Established. Each meeting of the Council shall convene at the time and place appointed therefor. Council business shall be conducted in the following order: (1) Call to order 8-29-94 Mound City Code Section 155:20 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Roll call Approval of minutes Public hearings Petitions, requests, and communications Ordinances and resolutions Comments and suggestions from citizens present Reports of officers, boards, and committees Unfinished business New business Miscellaneous Adjournment Subd. 2. Varying Order. The order of business may be varied by the presiding officer, but all public hearings shall be held at the time specified in the notice of heating. Subd. 3. Agenda. The Clerk shall prepare an agenda of business for each regular Council meeting and file a copy in his/her office not later than one day before the meeting. The agenda shall be prepared in accordance with the order of business and copies thereof shall be delivered to each Council member and to the official newspaper of the City as far in advance of the meeting as time for preparation will permit. No item of business shall be considered unless it appears on the agenda for the meeting or is approved for the addition to the agenda by a unanimous vote of the Council members present. Section 155:20. Quorum and Voting. Subd., 1. Quorum. At all Council meetings a majority of all the Council members elected shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. Subd., 2. Voting. The votes of the members on any questions may be taken in any manner which signifies the intention of the individual members, and the votes of the members on any action taken shall be recorded in the minutes. The vote of each member shall be recorded on each appropriation of money, except for payments of judgments, claims, and amounts fixed by statute. If any member is present but does not vote, the minutes, as to his/her name, shall be marked "Present-Not Voting". Subd. 3. Votes Required. A majority vote of all members of the Council shall be necessary for approval of any ordinance unless a larger number is required by statute. Except as otherwise provided by statute, a majority vote of a quorum shall prevail in all other cases. 8-29-94 Mound City Code Section 155:25 l~%'tion 155:Z$. Ordinances, Resolutions, Motions, Petitions and Communications. Subd. 1. Readings. Every ordinance and resolution shall be presented in writing. An ordinance or resolution need not be read in full unless a member of the Council requests such a reading. Subd. 2. Signing and Publication Proof. Every ordinance and resolution passed by the Council shall be signed by the Mayor, attested by the Clerk, and filed by him or her in the ordinance or resolution book. Proof of publication of every ordinance shall be attached and filed with the ordinance. Subd. 3. Repeals and Amendments. Every ordinance or resolution repealing a previous ordinance or resolution or a section or subdivision thereof shall give the number, if any, and the title of the ordinance or code number of the ordinance or resolution to be repealed in whole or in part. Each ordinance or resolution or part thereof shall set forth in full each amended section or subdivision as it will read with the amendment. Subd. 4. Motions, Petitions, Communications. Every motion shall be stated in full before it is submitted to a vote by the presiding officer and shall be recorded in the minutes. Every petition or other communication addressed to the Council shall be in writing and shall be read in full upon presentation to the Council unless the Council dispenses with the reading. Each petition or other communication shall be recorded in the minutes by title and filed with the minutes in the office of the Clerk. Section 155:30. Suspension or Amendment of Rules. These rules may be suspended only by a two-thirds vote of the members present and voting. Section 155:35. Salaries of Mayor and Council Members. Effective January 2, 1995, the salary of the Mayor shall be $375 per month and the salary of each Council Member shall be $250 per month. (ORD. //70-1994, 8-29-94) Section 155:40. Worker's Compensation. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 176.011, Subdivision 9, Clause 5, the elected officials of the City and Municipal Officers appointed for a regular term of office shall be included in the City's coverage for Worker's Compensation under the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act. (ORD. #22-1989 - 2-20-89) 8-29-94 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAY~NOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 April 8, 2000 Bill and Dorothy Netka 2360 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Dear Bill and Dorothy, As you know, the City of Mound is in the process of implementing the "Mound Visions" Downtown redevelopment plan. As part of this effort, the I-IRA has approved a preliminary development agreement with the Beard Group, Inc. Preliminary plans prepared for a portion of the downtown area which includes your business property. Jim Prosser, the Project Coordinator, and I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you at your convenience so that we may better understand any concerns and suggestions you may have regarding this project. Please call me at 472-0609 so that we may schedule this meeting. I am looking forward to meeting with you! Sincerely, Kandis Hanson City Manager printed on recycled paper 2360 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 May l7,2000 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minn. 55364 R~e~ Netka Building 2313 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 To: Ms. Kandis Hanson: This is in response to your letter dated April 8th, 2000, and postmarked May 9th, 2000. You have asked us to meet with you to discuss the Mound Visions plan. You also left a telephone message for us yesterday and asked us to meet with you on May 25th. We have a previous commitment for that date, and will be unable to meet with you at that time. Perhaps you could send us a letter to let us know what your concerns are in regard to our property at 2313 Commerce Blvd., in Mound. We are enclosing drawings for the new building we wish to build at this location. We previously sent letters and drawings of the building to the City of Mound on January 1 lth, February 7th, and April 4th, of this year. We have asked the City of Mound for the final development plans and zoning ordinances for the Langdon area, so that we can give this information to our architect and go forward with our building project. We also have asked for TIF funding from the City of Mound, and have asked that they send us the necessary papers and information for the TIF funding. We would appreciate hearing from you on this at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Very truly yours, DN Enclosures (5) SECOND FLOOR PLAN SECOND / THIRD FLOOR PLAN ©)~ LOWER LEVEL PLAN FIRSTFLOOR PLAN SITE PLAN CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAY/NOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 May 26, 2000 Bill and Dorothy Netka 2360 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Dear Bill and Dorothy, I am writing in response to your letter dated May 17, 2000. I apologize if I left the impression that the only possible meeting date was May 25. You can be assured that every effort will be made accommodate your schedule and meet at your convenience. My reason for wanting to meet with you is twofold. As the newcomer to the City of Mound, I want get to know you and learn, first hand, of your goals and desires. Secondly, a meeting will enable the City to fully explain its role in working with property owners throughout the redevelopment process, and how we as staff can help you through the process. Please call me and suggest a date and time which fits with your schedule. Sincerely, Kandis Hanson City Manager printed on recycled paper 2360 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 April 4, 2000 Mrs. Fran Clark, Acting City Manager Mound City Hall 5341 Ma~vwood Rd. Mound, Minn. 55364 Re: Netka Building 2313 Coimmerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 To: Mrs. Fran Clark, Acting City Manager We wrote a letter to Bruce Chamberlain on February 7th, 2000, to advise him that we wish to build a commercial / residential building on our prope~' at 2313 Commerce Blvd., in Mound. We requested the final development plans and zoning ordinances for the Langdon area, so that we could give the information to our architect to go forward with our project. Evidently, these plans have not been finished as yet, as we have not been advised of this by Mr. Chamberlain. We are also again requesting T~ funding from the City of Mound for this new building. Please send us the necessary papers and information for the TIF funding as soon as possible. We are enclosing drawings of the proposed building we wish to build on 2313 Commerce Blvd., in Mound for your reference. Please send us information on the above at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, Bill & Dorothy Netka0 DN (Enclosures) NV]d ~O0]J O~lN£ / ONOD]S ' U ~ Reply to Netka Letter From Jim Prosser. Bill and Dorothy Netka 2360 Commerce Boulevard Mound. ~MN 55364 Dear Bill and Dorothy Netka: I have been asked to respond to your letter addressed to Bruce Chamberlain dated February 7, 2000. Your letter, as I understand it. had two objectives: First. you were in_forming Mr. Chamberlain of your wish to build a commerciaL/residential building on your propert?' at 2313 Commerce Boulevard in Mound: and in that connection were requesting information about zoning and final development plans for the Langdon area. Secondly. you were requesting TIF ~5.mding for the new building. In terms of the first objective. I believe that you both knox,,' that Motmd is more than willing to cooperate with you in reviewing any plans that you may have tbr the development of >'our propeR'. It is not the intention of the City. to limit your use of your propeR'ty so long -as your proposed development is consistent with the land use regulations and building requirements of the Ci~'. I have asked M.r. Chamberlain to provide you with the current land use regulations applicable to your property. My response on the second objective, your request for TIF funding, is controlled by the agreement that is currently in place be~veen the HRA and Mound Mainsrreet. Inc.. the developer that is proposing to develop the Langdon area. That a~eement, which has an initial term of one year. prohibits the HRA from providing f'mancial assistance to anyone else x~,-isking to develop within the Langdon area during the term of the agreement. You may find it worthwhile to enter into discussions with Mound Mainstreet, Inc., concerning whether or not you could have a role in its development plans. To the extent your propert)' is included in the Mound Mainstreet. Inc. development. TIF thnding is an option which the HRA would be willing to consider. I hope that this serves as an adequate response to your letter to Mr. Chamberlain. If I can be of further assistance, or provide you with additional information, please advise. 2360 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 February 7, 2000 Mr. Bruce Chamberlain Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. 123 N. 3rd St. Minneapolis, Minn. 55401 Re: Netka Building 2313 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 To: Bruce Chamberlain: This is to advise you that we wish to build a commercial/residential building on our property at 23 13 Commerce Blvd., in Mound. This will coincide with the new development plans that the City of Mound has in progress. We are requesting TiF funding from the City of Mound for this new building. Please send us the necessary papers and information for the TIF funding as soon as possible. We would also like to get the final development plans and zoning ordinances for the Langdon area, so that we can g/ve this information to our architect and go forward with our plans. We assure you we will build in accordance with the City of Mound's new- development plans. Please send us the above information at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, DN Bill & Dorothy Netka Telephone-612-472-3200 cc: Tim Sullivan cc: Mark Hanus, Council Member cc: Fran Clark, Acting City Manager February24,2000 Bill and Dorothy Netka 2360 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Dear Bill and Dorothy Netka: cc: Fran Clark-Leisinger Pat Meisel Bruce Chamberlain John Dean I have been asked to respond to your letter addressed to Bruce Chamberlain dated February 7, 2000. Your letter, as I understand it, had two objectives: First, you were informing Mr. Chamberlain of your wish to build a commercial/residential building on your property at 2313 Commerce Boulevard ~n Mound; and in that connection were requesting information about zoning and final development plans for the Langdon area. Secondly, you were requesting TIF funding for the new building. In terms of the first objective, I believe that you both know that Mound is more than willing to cooperate with you in reviewing any plans that you may have for the development of your property. It is not the intention of the City to limit your use of your property so long as your proposed development is consistent with the land use regulations and building requirements of the City. I have asked Mr. Chamberlain to provide you with the current land use regulations applicable to your property. My response on the second objective, your request for TIF funding, is controlled by the agreement that is currently in place between the HRA and Mound Mainstreet, Inc., the developer that is proposing to develop the Langdon area. That agreement, which has an initial term of one year, prohibits the HRA from providing financial assistance to anyone else wishing to develop within the Langdon area during the term of the agreement. You may find it worthwhile to enter into discussions with Mound Mainstreet, Inc., concerning whether or not you could have a role in its development plans. To the extent your property is included in the Mound Mainstreet, Inc. development, TIF funding is an option which the HRA would be willing to consider. I hope that this serves as an adequate response to your letter to Mr. Chamberlain. If I can be of further assistance, or provide you with additional information, please advise. Sincerely, EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. James Prosser Financial Advisor 2360 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 February 7, 2000 Mr. Bruce Chamberlain Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. 123 N. 3rd St. Minneapolis, Minn. 55401 Re: Netka Building 2313 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 To: Bruce Chamberlain: This is to advise you that we wish to build a commercial / residential building on our property at 2313 Commerce Blvd., in Mound. This will coincide with the new development plans that the City of Mound has in progress. We are requesting TIF funding from the City of Mound for this new building. Please send us the necessary papers and information for the TIF funding as soon as possible. We would also like to get the final development plans and zoning ordinances for the Langdon area, so that we can give this information to our architect and go forward with our plans. We assure you we will build in accordance with the City of Mound's new development plans. Please send us the above information at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, DN Bill & Dorothy Netka Telephone-612-472-3200 cc: Tim Sullivan cc: Mark Hanus, Council Member cc: Fran Clark, Acting City Manager 2360 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 February 7, 2000 Mr. Bruce Chamberlain Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. 123 N. 3rd St. Minneapolis, Minn. 55401 Re~ Netka Building 2313 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 To: Bruce Chamberlain: This is to advise you that we wish to build a commercial / residential building on our property at 2313 Commerce Blvd., in Mound. This will coincide with the new development plans that the City of Mound has in progress. We are requesting TIF funding from the City of Mound for this new building. Please send us the necessary papers and information for the TiF funding as soon as possible. We would also like to get the final development plans and zoning ordinances for the Langdon area, so that we can give this information to our architect and go forward with our plans. We assure you we will build in accordance with the City of Mound's new development plans. Please send us the above information at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, DN Bill & Dorothy Netka Telephone-612-472-3200 cc: Tim Sullivan cc: Mark Hanus, Council Member cc: Fran Clark, Acting City Manager Mound Referendum Open House Plan July 20, 2000 Date/Time/Location - The open house to provide the public with more information about the September 12 referendum questions will be held on Wednesday, August 16, from 5 p.m to 7:30 p.m., at Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church in Mound. Open House Format - An open house format has been selected to provide information on the referendum. It will allow people to come and go as they please in a time frame that is convenient for them. It provides stations that cover the major areas of information needed, enabling attendees to skip to the appropriate area for their questions as they so choose. It allows people to get their questions answered one-on-one. And finally, it is a format where people feel more in control. It helps avoid the frustration they can experience if they must sit silently through a formal presentation. Room Set-up - The room will have tables and display boards, but should avoid having chairs where attendees can sit. By making people stand, they are more likely to circulate and less likely to dominate any one area. The stations are set up in logical order to cover the important areas of information. Handouts - Extra copies of the Mound Newsletter Q&A will be available at the open house. Boards - Everyone staffing a station will be responsible for the production of his or her own boards. Notice - A news release will be submitted by the City to the Mound Laker by Tuesday, August 8, 4:30 p.m., for publication on Saturday, August 12. The City will also publish a notice of the open house in the Mound Laker. In addition, residents will receive the City's newsletter in the mail during the week prior to the open house with the referendum Q&A and notice of the open house. Refreshments - Refreshments will be served. Open House Stations No. 1 --Referendum Question/Site as it Exists -- This station will contain two boards - 1) the map of the site and 2) the two referendum questions as they will appear on the ballot. The purpose of this station is to provide attendees with information about the site, how it is divided, which portion is impacted by the referendum, etc. This station would also introduce attendees to the referendum questions and provide opportunities for related questions (e.g., What if one question passes and not the other?) Staffing: Bruce Chamberlain, Hoisington Koegler Kandis Hanson, City Manager No. 2 - Financing -- This station would deal with questions/issues about financing and costs. It will contain one board -property tax impacts of the referendum on residential and commercial properties. Staffing: Jim Prosser, Ehlers & Associates Gino Businaro, Finance Director No. 3 -- Site Improvements -- This station would be designed to get feedback from attendees on the level of facility desired. It would contain four boards, each listing the features of a level of facility. They would be 1) passive park, with only code improvements, 2) neighborhood park, with limited improvements and facilities, 3) community park/athletic facility, with central park theme and state of the art athletic facilities, and 4) housing redevelopment, with recreational facilities incorporated such as paths, tennis courts and playfeatures. Each attendee would have a sticker to place on a board and to "vote" on the level of facility they prefer. Staffing Jim Fackler, Parks Director Don Brauer, Land Use Consultant No. 4 -- Questions - This station would allow attendees to write down the questions they have which have not been answered. They could elect to have someone phone them at a later date with an answer and/or those questions could be used in the revised referendum Q&A. Staffing: Jill Schultz, JMS Communications No. 5 -- School Station -- This station would provide the opportunity for attendees to learn how the facilities at Haddorff Field would be replaced or the activities relocated if the City purchases the field. A board at this site could list those activities/facilities and how they would be dealt with. Attendees would also have the opportunity to ask the School District any other questions such as issues related to property ownership. Staffing: School District Staff Vol. 12, No.2 Summer2000 Haddorff referendum set for September 12 In the September 12primary election, the voters of Mound will be asked to vote on whether or not the City should bond to purchase and make improvements to ttaddorff Field, the recreational area located at the northwest corner of Commerce Boulevard and Lynwood Boulevard. This Q&A addresses common questions about the referendum questions. Q. What are the referendtan questions? A. Voters will be asked to vote "ycs" or"no" on the follov,4ng quesfons: 1) Acquisition of 10+ acre community center playfields site Shall the Mound City Council be authorized to issue and sell its general obligations bonds in an amount not to exceed $1,300,000 for the purpose of acquiring the 10+ acre"community center' playfields site in the city as pan of a development program consisting of the acquisition and betterment of recreational, facilities on the site? 2) Acquisition and betterment of recreational facilities If the CityofMound acquires the 10+ acre recreational site located at the 19 acre community center complex at the old Motmd High School, should the Mound City Council be authorized to issue and sell City general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $1,450,000 to finance the cost of equipping the Site with recreational facilities? Q. Why is the City considering purchasing the Haddorff Field property at tile old high school site? A. HaddorffField is a portion of the site 19-acre old high school site owned by the Westonka School District. The Disu'~ct no longer has a need for the property and. would like to sell the property and use the sale proceeds to finance other school improvements. The Westonka School District has had a purchase agreement with MetroPlains Development for the sale of the entire 19-acre site. (See map on page 5). MetroPlains is proposing to redevelop the pla.vfields propeay into a primarily residential use. Some commtmity membex$, through a petition to the City, expressed an interest in keeping the 10-plus acre HaddorffField portion of the school district site for recreational use. Approval of the referendum questions would authorize the City of Mound to sell bonds for the purchase of the property and make certain improvements. It would not obligate the City to either sell the bonds or to purchase the field. Q. What facilities are currently a part of ttaddorff Field? A. Currently, the propertyeontains a football/soccer field, a track, a Babe Ruth baseball field, a Sandy Kolfax baseball field, a hockey rink and playground equipment. Referendum continued on page 2 Q. How can l find out more about the referendum? A. The City will be holding an open house on August 16 from 5 to 7:30 p.m. at Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church. If you have questions, contact City Manager Kandis Hanson at 472-0609. ~D¥~ g[9:XV,4 qqVH qlI880~ ~: II I~tf Q, If the City purchased Haddorff Field, why would improvements be neeessar, v ? ,4 The current condition of the field falls below the basic standards for public athletic fields. Improvements will be necessary to provide compliance with state statutes, city codes, safety, and reasonable publi, e convenience. Minimum improvements would be upgrades in the current facilities. Maximum kmprovements could include some or all of the following items: public toilets, paved parking, lighting, irrigation systems, concession stand, new fencing, landscaping, a warming house, field realignment and turf up-grades. Q. But why' would up to $1.45 million be needed for improvements? A. The City Council reviewed a wide range of options for the H_addorffField area, ranging fi-om mia/mai improvements that would bring HaddorffField up to current code and safety standards, to full development as a commu~ty athletic field mad park. By authoriziagup to $1.45 million for park. improvements, all of these options would remain open until after the referendum. The City would then seek public input regarding the appropriate use and improvements for HaddorffField. Q. If both referendum questions are approved, wi]l the City Council automatically purchase the land and make $1.45 mi]lion in improvements? A. No. Those decisions rest in the complete discretion of the City Council. Approval of both of the referendwn questions only creates the opportunity to purchase and improve the site. Before any final decision is made to actually issue bonds for property purchase or improvements, the City Council will seek input from the public, the Mound Planning Commission, the Park and Open Space Advisory Commission, and other interested parties. They will provide input on the level of improvements needed and that will determine the level of Q. Where do I vote? A. The referendum vote will be a part of the September primary election held Tuesday, September 12, from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Voters can cast their ballots in the following locations: Precinct #1 Mount Olive Lutheran Church 5218 Bartlett Boulevard Precinct #2 Indian Knoll Manor 2020 Commerce Boulevard Precinct #3 Mound City Hall 5341 Maywood Road Precinct #4 Seahorse Recreation Building 5430 Three Points Boulevard Precinct #5 The Depot at Mound Bay Park 5801 Bartlett Boulevard Precinct #6 Hennepin County Library 2079 Commerce Boulevard funding require. After reviewin§ all of'hat information, thc City Council will decide whether to proceed, and if so, on what basis. Q. What if voters approve the first referendum question authorizing the purchase of the property, but not the second question authorizing funding for improvements ? A. ]"ne consensus of the City Council is that HaddorffField should not be purchased unless the City is able to take full advantage of the property and provide the best use possible. The City Council determined that the $1.3 million should not be spent unless the voters approve ftmding for park improvements as well. Both questions must pass for there to be adequate funding to purchase and make appropriate improvements to the playfields. Q. If the City does not purchase the ] O-plu.~ acre Haddorff Field, what will become of it? A. The school district expects to proceed with the sale of the entire 19-acre old high. school property to MetroPlains Development for redevelopment. Although there is no approved plan for the site, MetroPlains Development's initial plans include the construction of new townhomes, with a compliments.fy retail development. MetroPlains has indicated its design would include a community square and potentially some park/open commons or recreational space. However, any open space provided would be significantly smaller than what exists today. The City will need ~o approve the final plan for site development. ~'~ ~ ~ M0¥d 8LZg 9~9 glg'XYzl TiYH T!IhIht0~~¥ ~'II IH~I Q. If Haddorff Field is sold for development, will the current recreational facilities be replaced by' the Westonka School District? A. Yes, according to school officials, who have indicated that the recreational activities that currently take place at the field will be replaced at new and existing facilities. A new football/soccer/ track stadium would be built at Mound-Westonka High School. Baseball groups using Haddorff Field would be relocated to the baseball field in the Westonka Recreation Association complex in Minnetrista. There is also some discussion of the feasibility of an outdoor hockey rink and wanTdng house being located at the high sclaool. Q. If the City purchases the lO- plus acre Haddorff Field, will the remaining parcel of the 19-acre old high school site still be redeveloped? A. Yes. Metro?lains Development has indicated it would still proceed with the commercial/retail development on the portion of the 19-acre site that the City does not purchase for recreational purposes. Q. Will there be any maintenance costs for the athletic facilities, and if so, who will pay them? A. Although some minor maintenance activities may be provided by user groups, ultimately, the property maintenance would be the responsibility of the City. Maintenance activities would include field maintenance such as mowing, sWiping and dragging fields; ligh~g; s~cture maintenance; possibly a skating rink, and liability insurance. The Citywould need to plan for about a $20,000 annual increase in the City budget to fund maintenance. Q. How will passage of the two referendum questions impact my property taxes? A. Ifbo~ the $1.3 million and $1.45 million in bonds were issued, the annual impact on your property taxes would be as follows: $60 per yearon a $125,000 home, $85 per year on a $175,000 home, and $120 per year on a $250,000 home. The impact on a $1 million property would be $480 annually. 8£~ 9~9 ~I9:X¥~ The City may decide to issue bonds that mature in a shorter period of time to match the useful life of the park asset. In that case, thc impact will increase the cost per household. Q. lghat are the tax benefits to the City of having the entire 19- acre site redeveloped as is currently proposed with housing and retail property vs. keeping I O-plus acres as recreational space? A, The tax benefits to the City of redeveloping the entire 19-acre property would depend on the type of development, Since plans have not yet been submitted it is not possible to project exact revenues. However, given the current zoning it is reasonable to assume potential taxes of at least $150,000 annually. The City's share of the taxes would be about $23,000. The rest of the property tax revenue would go to other taxing jurisdictions. Q. Does this referendum have anything to do with the Ponds Arena? A. The Harold I. Pond Sports Center, owned by the Westonka/ Orono Sports Center Association, is adjacent to but not included in the site that will be redeveloped, Shared parking could help the Pond Arena if the referendum passes and the property is purchased and improved parking is added to HaddorffField. Q. I~buld a new community center be included in any plans for the 19-acre site? A. No, there are no plans for a new community center. However, a non-City funded senior center has been approved by the City Council and will be built near the intersection of Commerce Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard in the near future. Mound Calendar Aug. 16 Referendum Open House 5 - 7:3 0 p.m. at Oux Lady of the Lake Catholic Church Sept. 4 Mound Ci~- offices closed for Labor Day observance Sept. 12 Primary Election. See page 2 for voting locations · Recycling pick-ups are scheduled every Monday and Tuesday. · The Planning Commission meets the second and fourth Monday of each month, beginning at 7:30 p.m. · City Council meetings am held the second and fomth Tuesdays of each month, beginning at 7:30 p.m. · The Economic Development Commission meets at 7 a.m. the third Thursday of each month. · The Park and Open Space Commission meel~ at 7:30 p.m. the second Thuraday of each month, · Thc Dock and Commons Commission meets at 7:30 p.m. thc third 'I'httrsday of each month. City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 5536~- (612) 472-0600 U.S, Postage PAID Pemait No. 87 Mound, MN City of Mound Council Members Pat Meisel, Mayor 472-2097 Andrea Ahrens 472-1520 Bob Bmwn472-3650 Mark I-'Ianus 472-5480 Leah Weycker 472-4187 Owner/Occupant Kandis Hanson, City Manager Tim Buss¢, Editor ~'~>~ ~ ~OYd 8LPg 999 gt9'XYd qqVH %qlHH0~ ~V GE:II IH~ O0-t~-~£ OT-O?-O0 14:00 From-KENNEDY t GRAVEN +3379310 T-;e4 P.O2/IZ ;44? MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: John Dean Sharon Scott ~ July 6, 2000 Council and Park Commis.~ion Actions with respect to Ret~rendum You have asked what actions are permissible for the Mound Park Commission to take with respect to advocacy or education regarding a proposed bond referendum. There is no relevant statute and no Minnesota case law that addresses the actions of a municipal entity or municipal employees m this regard. However, the Minnesota Attorney Genera nas considered this issue, and concluded that, in the case of a school board, public funds and staff time may be spent in impartially educating and informing the voters about the i~ues in a referendum. Op. Minn. Att'y Gen'l 159a-3, May 24, 1966. For example, a school board could pay the reasonable expenses of priming and mailing literature explaining a project to voters. A school board may not expend public funds or staff time to advocate a'yes or a no vote on that referendum. Id. Individual members ufa school board :nay, without expend:ng st-,df ume, explatn and advocate a yes or a no vote on a referendum question. Id. The Attorney General opinion cites Cirizea.~ ro Pn. aect Pub. F, nds v. Bd of Education, 98 Atl. 2d 673, quoting: [W]hen the program represents the body's judgment of what is required in the effective discharge of its responsibility, it is not only the fight, but perhaps the duty of the body to endeavor to secure the assent of the voters thereto The question we are considering is simply the extent to and manner in which the funds may with justice to the fights of dissenters be expended for espousal of the ~oters' approval of the body's judgment. Even thi~ the body may do within fair limits. The reasonable expense, for example., of the conduct of a pubhc forum at ~,hich all may appear and freely express their views pro and con would not be ~mproper. The ~ame may be smd of reasonable expenses incurred for radio or televmon broadc.-,,~ts taking the form of debates between proponents of the differing sides of the propo,qtion. It is the expenditure of public funds in support of one side only in a manner whxch give~ the dissenters no opportunity to presem then- side which is outside the pale. Id. at 67%678. I have attached to this memorandum a copy of a letger of Dave Kennedy to the City of Brooklyn Center, which addresses, in pan, this i~sue. Guidelines for consideration by a SMS 1-1 ~27~Z,, 1 MU2iX%~4 O?-O?-O0 14:06 From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN +~79310 T-~Z4 P.OS/1Z F-B4? municipal entity in ~pplication of the Anomey General's rule are set out in that leuer which seem on point In this c~e. and I have reproduced them, slightly modified, here: a) Any expenditure of funds or staff rime ro fully in:tbrm the electorate about the purpose of the election, the use of the funds to be obtained by the bond sale, irs potential tax impact, the relation of thc proposed project.~ to thc City's plans and thc rational of thc Council's decision to ask for voter approval is permissible. b) Member of the Council and City staff are free, just as other citizens, to advocate r_he passage of the proposal. The City may not expend public funds or utilize staff time to prepare material or circulate material prepared by itself or others urging a yes or no vote at the election. d) The City may make available to others any data in its possession bearing on the i~sue to be decided at the election for use by any person or group in perforrmng material or conducting a campmgn for or again,~t the proposal. e) Any doubt about the propriety of a suggested course of action relating to the disseminauon of mtbrm~tion about the election should be resolved by not taking the action; that is, ~: conservative approach to ~he quesuon.~ should -atw~tys be taken. M i.J 2uo-8-~ January 23, 1980 Mr. Gerald Splinter Czty Manager Caty of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Cenuer, MN 55430 Re: Special Election for Park Improvement Bonds: Procedures and Comments Dear Gerry: You have asked me to prepare an ou=line of procedures to be followed in the conduct of a special election at which the voters of Uhe City will be asked to approve the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance park improvements. The s:eps involved, togeuher wiuh comments and forms follows. 1. Resolution Calling Sppcial Election. The bond issuing procedure is initia~ed by adoption by the council of a resolution calling a special election, fixing the date therefor, stating form of the question to be voted upon and the form of the ballot, and providing for the conduct of the election. (See Form No. 1.) The special election may be held either separa=e from or on the same dane as the regular election. The adoption of the resolution is by Council initiative, but :he Council is required to call such an election on any question, not submitted to the voters within the preceding six months, upon receipt of a petition signed by a number of voters equal to 20% of the vo=es cast a~ the Iasc regular City election. 2. Conduqc of Election: ~:~ Judges. The election is be conducted in =he same manner as other municipal elections. The polls must remain open for at least three hours, and =he hour~ SeC for the las~ municipal etec~ion conurol unless different hours are specified in the resolo=ion calling =he election. The election judges and officials are those appointed for =he last municipal elecuion unless new ~udges are to be appointed. The polling places too are ~he same as ~he preceding election. O?-O?-.O0 14:0T Pa~e Two Special Election for ~ar~ Improvements P.05/12 F-84T 3. NOtice_ Of Election. The notice taus: state ius time and place, the loca=ion of :he polling places and =he form of =he question. The notice must be: a) Published once in nhe official newspaper leas: =hree weeks before nhe dane of =he election and b) Posted in nhe Clerk's office for public inspecuion. (No time is specified, but ten days is suggested.) (See Form 2). 4. Ballot. The hal!o= is prepared by =he Clerk on blue paper. It must sua=e =he question as fixed by the Council in =he inztial resolution and con:ain basic instructions ~o voters. (See Form 1). The ballo~ must be (1) published once one week before the elect~on: (2) posted in =he Clerk's office a= least four days prior to the elecuion; and (3) posned in each polling 91ace. (See Form 3 for a~fidavius of posting). 5. Conduc= of Election: voting. Ail sta:u=ory rules for the conduct of municipal elections in general apply =o the actual conduct of =he 6. Canvass of Vote. The City Council mush meet ~o canvass =he returns of election prepared by ~he judges (See Form 5) within two days after the election. (It should be no:ed that =he statute requires =he canvass =o be completed within two days, but the City Charter prescribe~ five days: we suggest the statutory time.) A s=a=ement of the returns should be prepared by the Clerk for adoption by the Council which mush include: a) =he tonal number of good ballo:s cas:; b) the tonal number of spoiled or defective ballots; c) the acnual vone on ~he quesuion; copy of the ballot; e) the names of the judges and clerks of =he elect~on; and f) any o:her information about =he election deemed pe~uinent. 07,07-00 1~:07 Page Three Special Election for ~ark Improvements P.O6/IZ F-847 The Council should then declare the results of the canvass by resolu:zon. [See ¥orm 6.} The Clerk must certify :he results of uhe elec=ion ~o the Coun=y Auditor. No contest of =he results of =he elec=ion may be brought after seven days has elapsed since the adoption of nhe canvasszng resolunion. 7. Sale of Bonds: Limius on Resubmission. Bonds authorized at the special elec=ion may be issued and sold a= any Time al=er the contesu period has passed. The authority gran=ed by the vo=ers remains in effect for an leas= two years under =he cases decided by :he Minnesona Supreme Court. The question of issuing the same amount of bonds for =he same purpose may non be resubmit=ed :o the vouers for six months, and if defeaued at a resubmission may not ~hen De again submitted to the voters for one year. 8. None on Discount Bonds. In times o~ high inuerest ra~es it zs ofuen necessary for a City ~o offer for sale bonds represen=ing in=eresn only, in additzon to =he amoun= of principal ac=ually needed to finance =he proposed projects. Under this uechnique $ X in bonds are offered for a minimum price of $ Y and any amount less than $ X paid for the bonds is, in effec=, a discount which increases the effective interest rate on the bonds but allows the under~ri=er no cover his costs of marketing nhe bonds. (The City's financzal advisors will recommend the amount of discounn.) The dz~counn bonds may be issued in an amounu non exceeding uwo percen= of =he amount authorized at the elec=ion. Thus, if the vouers approve $ X =he City may issue and sell $ X plus .02 X in bonds. If the proposed project requires nhis, :he Ci=y staff and Council should be. prepared to explazn =he procedure prior to uhe election and should probably indica=e =hat it is a possibiliuy in ~he informanional material prepared for the elec=ion. The above procedures are spelled ou= in City Charter Chap:er 4 and Minneso=a Statutes, Chapters 205 and 475. I have omit:ed citations, bug can supply ghem if you desire. I'm sure A1 Lindman and Paul Holmulund are quite familiar wi~h the basic election process, and =~ag :he three of us toge=her can handle any fur:her questions that might arise. You have also asked for our opinion on the ques:ion of whan =he Cicy Council and s:aff can do in terms of informing the voters about the pros and cons of :he election itself. I:hink there is no clearer statement of the legal principles involved in this question than :he At:orney General's opinion I have attached, and I commend it to your reading, paruicularly :he quo:acion from :he New Jersey case on page 146. 07-0?-00 14:08 From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN +3379310 T-324 ~,w Olrr~cE$ L~FEMEF~E,=LEFLER, PEARSON, O'B~IEN & D~AWZ Page Four Special Election for Park Improvements P. 07/1Z F-847 While the rule is well stated in the quoted opinion its applica:ion =o specific fac= situations is a bit more difficu!=. It seems to me :ha= the guidelines the City should follow based on that rule are as follows: a) Any expenditure of funds or staff time =o fully infor~n =he elec=orace abouc the purpose of =he election, the use of =he funds to be obtained by the bond sale, its potencial tax impact, the relation of =he proposed pro~ec=s :o =he City's recreational plans and the rationale of the Council's decision =o ask for vo~er approval is permissable. b} Members of the Council and City staff are free, just as other ciu~zens, =o advocate =he passage of the proposal. c) The City may no: expend public funds or utilize staff time ~o prepare material or c~rcula=e material prepared by itself or other urging a yes vote a= :he election. d) e) The City may make available :o others any data in its possession bearing on the issue :o be decided at the election for use by any person or group in performing material or conducting a campaign for or agains~ the proposal. Any doubt abou= :he propriety of a suggested cause of ac=ion relacing to che dissemination of informa:ion about :he election should be resolved by no: taking :he action; =ha: is, a conservative approach to the ques:ion should always be :aken. I hope these comments are helpful to you, your staff and :he Council. I would, of course, be happy to review any material prepared by :he staff for use in the elec:ion, and to. answer ques:ions about specific actions proposed. DJK:caw Enclosures cc: Dick $chieffer ¥OU;:"s very truly, David 3. Kennedy O?-O?-O0 14:08 ;rom-KENNEOY & GRAVEN +;379310 T-;Z4 P.OS/1Z F-847 tim. Id~fieit&I~ eta. of edm~e? From-KENHEDY & GRAVEH +33Tg31~ T-3Z4 P.og/IZ F-~47 0~-07-00 14:0g & Iqm3,ez ammo of tho kboo% Board From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN +3~79310 T-~24 P.IO/1Z F-847 Jul 28 2888 16:57:48 Via Fax AMM FAX lie July 17-21, 2000 -> Xandis Xanson Page 881 Of 881 Association of Hetropolitan ~unicipalities Met Council staff presents budget In anticipation of the formal budget presentation in August, Metropo tan Council staff presented an overview of the Council's 2001 General Fund Budget and tax levy. The general fund, which includes the Regional Administration and the Community Development Division has a 2000 budget of $29.0 million. The proposed 2001 budget is $31.3 million, or a 7.8 percent increase. Expenditures driving the cost in- creases are salaries and "Smart Growth" initiatives. The general fund budget accounts for less than 10 percent of the Council's annual budget. The total 2000 Council levy was $129.0 million. The 2001 preliminary levy is estimated to be $137.6 million, or approximately $3.0 million below the Council's combined levy limit. The Important TIF dates approach TTWO important dates regarding IF will impact cities with districts. First, the annual reports to the Office of the State Auditor (OSA) for all districts are due by Aug. 1. Secondly, a statutory provision related to the duration of districts created prior to Aug. 1, 1979 becomes operative on April 1, 2001. Minnesota Statutes 469.176 subdivi- sion lc states that after April 1; 2001; increment from a district certified prior to Aug. 1, 1979 can only be used for debt service payments for bonds issued before April 1, 1990. Bonds issued to refund the pre-April 1, 1990 bonds are also included in the defini- tion of bonds. In effect, after April 1, 2001 a pre-1979 district will not receive any new increment and not authorize new expenditures with TIF from the district. If you have a pre-1979 district: please review the application of the provision to your district(s). The AMM has requested the OSA to notify cities and county auditors of the provision. Wastewater rates likely to be adopted The staff of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has proposed that the adopted wastewater rates for 2001 be adopted, but that the rates for subsequent years not be approved at this time. Prior to the 2002 budget, the MCES will meet with cities to review the multi- year rate schedule. preliminary 2001 levy is a $8.6 million or a 6.62 percent increase over the 2000 levy. Of the total increase, $6.8 million is for transit operations and $1.2 million is for debt service. The proposed unified operating budget will be presented to the Metro- politan Council on Aug. 16 and the Truth-in-Taxation hearing is scheduled for Dec. 6. New administrator to be appointed sometime this fall ApePlications for the Met Council gional administrator job were due July 17. Approximately 20 applications have been received. The selection committee will begin meeting on Aug. 9. A new adminis- trator should be recommended to the full Council by Sept. 30. AMM, LMC to respond to TIF report mwhe Senate Property Tax Division ill conduct a TIF hearing on Wednesday, July 26 at 2 p.m. in Room 1S of the Capitol to discuss the recent Citizens' League TIF Report. TheAMM and LMC staff will participate in a panel discussion that will react to the report and related editorial by Citizens' League Executive Director Lyle Wray. The report analyzes the annual property tax abstract prepared by the county auditors. The report based its conclusions on the total annual data and did not segregate the data by such factors as year of certification or district type. The report concludes that TIF is growing in terms of new districts and market value within the district. The editorial suggests that TI F should be part of a coordinated regional economic development strategy and job training should be a major focus of the strategy. The AMM and LMC staffwill attempt to show the division members that legislative changes have resulted in TIF use that has resulted in smaller districts with a focus on housing and redevelop- ment. CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT June 2000 50.00% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from Other Funds Charges to Other Departments June 2000 Y'rD PERCENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED 1,344,330 536,000 536,000 (808,330) 39.87% 4,210 150 3,445 (765) 81.83% 116,200 24,542 83,272 (32,928) 71.66% 963,800 0 38,284 (925,516) 3.97% 85,700 21,815 54,716 (30,984) 63.85% 100,000 10,404 55,145 (44,855) 55.15% 63,500 926 15,917 (47,583) 25.07% 47,500 0 0 (47,500) 0.00% 13,000 988 7,087 (5,913) 54.52% TOTAL REVENUE 2,738.240 594~825 793,866 (1,944,374} 28.99% FIRE FUND RECYCLING FUND LIQUOR FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCK FUND 377,470 73,991 261,115 (116,355) 69.18% 115,600 6,827 52,721 (62,879) 45.61% 1,750,000 184,823 851,627 (898,373) 48.66% 500,000 40,632 206,377 (293,623) 41.28% 960,000 81,411 482,870 (477,130) 50.30% 6,200 90 2,810 (3,390) 45.32% 86,000 599 68,025 (17,975) 79.10% 07/19~2000 rev00 Gino CITY OF UOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT ,June 2000 50.00% June 2000 YTD BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND Council 77,620 4,808 Promotions 4,000 4,000 Cable TV 26,000 30 City Manager/Clerk 198,750 22,804 Elections 12,450 0 Assessing 68,000 17 Finance 175,400 23,212 Computer 22,100 330 Legal 146,980 4,368 Police 1,049,650 130,203 Civil Defense 12,150 736 Planning/Inspections 208,250 21,957 Streets 485,990 36,100 City Property 76,890 4,579 Parks 208,050 48,143 Summer Recreation 39,570 0 Contingencies 106,780 0 Transfers 166.120 13,844 42,773 4,000 396 97,987 204 172 90,541 5.172 49.554 549.115 1 745 112 666 288 545 40 312 117 429 0 575 83,060 PERCENT VARIANCE EXPENDED 34,847 55.11% 0 100.00% 25,604 1.52% 100,763 49.30% 12,246 1.64% 67,828 0.25% 84,859 51.62% 16,928 23.40% 97,426 33.71% 500,535 52.31% 10,405 14.36% 95,584 54.10% 197,445 59.37% 36,578 52.43% 90,621 56.44% 39,57O 0.00% 106,205 0.54% 83,060 50.00% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3,084,750 315,131 1,484,246 1,600,504 48.12% Area Fire Service Fund 411,520 TIF 1-2 0 Recycling Fund 124,980 Liquor Fund 238,920 Water Fund 441,360 Sewer Fund 939,410 Cemetery Fund 8,190 Dock Fund 80,640 21,613 162,122 249,398 39.40% 36,398 126,017 (126,017) 13,528 57,975 67,005 46.39% 34,082 133,215 105,705 55.76% 46,743 215,758 225,602 48.88% 86,153 435,418 503,992 46.35% 881 1,884 6,306 23.00% 7,385 44,207 36,433 54.82% Exp-00 07119/2000 Gino General Fund CDBG Area Fire Protection Services MSA Sealcoat PW Facility Capital Improvement CDB Commerce Place TIF Downtown TIF 1-2 Co Rd 15 Recycling Liquor Store Water Sewer Cemetery Dock Fire Relief HRA $923,621 1,756 296,232 44,560 15,342 53,998 294,869 3,356 80,862 (321,621) 7 783 58 456 339 212 733 573 679 852 5 960 261 537 (59,389) 0 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 07/19~2000 CashReportCouncil Gino 0 )- ~. )- ~. LU UJ tU LU m W tU tU ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Z Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 O) ca m ~ ~J ~ 0 0 0 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0500 FAX (612) 472-0620 To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager From: Joel Krumm, Liquor Store Manager Re: Semi Annual Report Date: July 5th 2000 The purpose of this report is to keep you up to date as to the performance of the liquor store through the first six months of this year. I am happy to inform you that we are currently $61,673 ahead of last year at this same time. I am also pleased to report that we have had 822 more customers to date this year as compared to the first six months of 1999. I am predicting that we are on a pace to increase sales by about $80,000 - $85,000 over last year. If we do, that will be keeping even with industry inflation figures of about 4%, plus a little extra due to the rise in our customer count. At a quick glance you may be asking yourselves, since we are already at $61,000 for the first six months, why wouldn't we do more in sales over the final six months? The reason for this is easy to explain. July of 1999 was a monster month. Gross sales were $214,000. July 4th was on a Sunday, meaning we were open Monday - Saturday. A full six days. This year the 4th of July fell on a Tuesday. Thus we were only open five business days that week, being that we were closed on Tuesday. Last year's calendar was set up so that in July there were five full weekend business days; i.e., Fridays and Saturdays. In 2000, July is missing a Friday's day of sales. And as you all are aware, weekends are our busiest times. So I believe we will fall approximately $14,000 short of last July's record breaking month. However, we should then rebound and continue to show increases for the last five months of the year. printed on recycled paper As you all probably know I have had some physical problems to deal with recently. I tore some cartilage in my knee and had to have arthroscopic surgery. A quick recovery requires that a person stay off one's feet for an adequate amount of time. Unfortunately, since we are short handed as usual in the personnel department, I was unable to stay away from work longer than I needed. Right now my recuperation is slow but steady and each day it gets a little better. I want to take this time to applaud, commend, congratulate, pat on the back, etc., etc., all my staff for pitching in and working even harder than they already do, since I was not able to perform much physical labor. I especially want to thank Julie Clyne for her understanding and extra effort. It was a difficult time for her also. She really stepped up and took charge when needed. She had to work additional hours that I am sure she really would prefer not to have. I truly appreciate what it means to have an excellent Assistant Manager. The store did manage to operate through this difficult time. What was brought to light by this incident is an issue that needs to be addressed in the 2001 budget. I feel the time has come to hire a full time Night Closer for the liquor store. I have discussed this with Kandis Hanson and we feel the request is valid based on these needs. 1) Whether due to sickness, injury or simply attempting to schedule vacation leave for management, when either Julie or I are absent the store is at a statTmg disadvantage. 2) The store is continually growing. This year we will produce $1,825,000 in sales. When I arrived here in 1984 sales were only $692,000 and the store employed 3 full time management level personnel. At that point in time we were grossly over staffed in this area. The over staffing issue was resolved and we were left with the management team we have now which was adequate for the amount of sales being generated. As you know the store turned around and began escalating over the years. Several years ago, upon reaching a level where I felt it was necessary to reinstate a third person to the organization, my requests were denied. The reason for denial, although I was never given an official explanation, was that the city was in a down sizing mode and any special accommodations given to the liquor store would open the doors to reciprocation for other departments. 3) To operate a business of this magnitude, without having an individual in some type of supervisory capacity, is not only ludicrous and unprofessional, it also leaves the door open to obvious problems that can and do arise. You can not expect part time employees, who's main concerns and interests are to their other full time jobs, to devote 100% of their initiative to a part time position after spending 8-10 hours at their other job before coming to work at the liquor store. In addition to maintaining control and providing better direction to the part time help a Night Supervisor would have the City's interest at heart and would be able to provide for improved customer services. 4) With the prospect of a new store looming on the horizon I feel that it is important we place a person in this position sometime next year. It is critical to our operation that a new person is given time to learn our procedures in depth before the new store opens. This person would then be an asset for us lending their assistance during the transition period. To hire for the position after the store opened would be a hindrance and an inconvenience. There is no need to be training in someone new during this critical interval. If your consent on this matter is approved during the budget process, I will begin to research this at the end of this year. I will be surveying other cities in the metropolitan area that have municipal liquor store operations. I will be inquiring into job responsibilities and pay scale. Job descriptions will be analyzed. I then plan to develop an appropriate job description that fits our specific requirements. Announcements will be published in the spring of 2001, with interviews commencing shortly after. It is my intention to have someone in place by the summer of 2001. Sincerely,