2000-10-24PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PIIONF~q & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2000, 7:30 PM
MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and
will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items
unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PAGE
o
APPROVE AGENDA, ~ ANY AMENDMENTS
*CONSENT AGENDA ~
*A.
APPROVE MINUTES: '~TOBER 10 REGULAR MEETING 4284-4293
OCTOBER 16 SPECIAL MEETING ..... 4294
*B.
*C.
4. THUR, NOV 30
5. MON, DEC 4
6. MON, DEC 11
7. TUES, DEC 12
8. TUES, DEC 26
OPEN HOUSE ON STORM SEWER RATF_~
HRA, CITY COUNCIL & TRUTH IN
TAXATION HEARING
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
CONTINUATION (IF NEEDED)
HRA & CITY COUNCIL
HRA & CITY COUNCIL CANCELLED
*D.
APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR BID AWARD
FOR SNOW REMOVAL CONTRACT ................ 4317-4318
*E.
APPROVE RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE
PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES
ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN
LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT - CALENDAR YEAR 2001 ...... 4319
*F.
APPROVE SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION: WESTONKA
SOCCER ASSOCIATION - 2001 SPRING TRAVELING SOCCER
REGISTRATIONS ................................. 4320
4280
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PItONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
PLANNING COMMISSION REC0 ATIONS
1. CASE # 00-52: MINOR SUBDIVISION, 5212 LYWN~D
BLVD. - STEVE CODDON, 5240 LYNVv'OOD BLVD.,
LOTS 6,7,8, BLOCK 1, REARRANGEMENT OF
BLOCK 10, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO
LAKESIDE PARK ..................... 4321-4339
2. CASE
# 00-53: VARAINCE, 5456 BARTLEIT BLVD
PATRICIA HARTY, 5456 BARTLETF BLVD
LOT 5, BLOCK 1, CHANNELTOWN
PID# 24-117-24-22-0010 ................. 4340-4348
3. CASE
# 00-55: VARIANCE, 4600 CUMBERLAND ROAD
PAUL GLYNN, 4600 CUMBERLAND ROAD
LOTS 1,2,28,29,30, BLOCK 8, WYCHWOOD
PID# 19-117-23-32-0184 ................. 4349-4368
4. CASE
# 00-56: MINOR SUBDIVISION, 6349 WALNUT
ROAD - KEVIN HINRICHS, 6349 WALNUT ROAD
LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 10, MOUND TERRACE
PID# 14-117-24-35-0065 ................. 4369-4383
5. CASE
# 00-57 & 00-61: MINOR SUBDMSION &
VARIANCE, 2857 HIGHLAND BLVD - LEANN
HANSSEN, 3195 CASCO CIRCLE LOTS 74 & 75,
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 168,
PID# 23-117-24-42-0098 ................. 4384-4402
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY
ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTF3 PER SPEAKER.)
PUBLIC HEARING ;
A. PUBLIC UTILITY CUSTOMERS WITH UNPAID WATER
AND SEWER BILLS, WITH ACTION ON RF_3OLUTION
ADOPTING DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ASSESSMENT
ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $79,726.78, TO BE CERTIFIED TO
THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT % INTEREST, LEVY #14936. . . 4403-4408
CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE PARTICIPANTS, WITH
ACTION ON RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2000 CBD PARKING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1,148.01, TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR
AT 8% INTEREST, LEVY #14937 ................... 4409-4410
RESIDENTS WITH UPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES, WITH
ACTION ON RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID TREE
REMOVAL CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT
OF $394.05, TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT
8% INTEREST, LEVY #14938 ...................... 4411-4412
4281
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CE!,I, PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
10.
De
RESIDENTS WITH UNPAID DRIVEWAY APRON REPLACEMENT
CHARGES, WITH RF~OLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID DRIVEWAY
APRON REPLACEMENT CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLL IN ~
AMOUNT OF $288.00, TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY
AUDITOR AT 896 INTEREST, LEVY #14939 ............ 4413-4414
CAROL WEBER, REPRES~NG TOBACCO-FRF~F~ FUTURE FOR
YOUTH, PRESENTATION AND REQUESTING ACTION ON
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT .......................... 4415-4417
DOCK AND COMMONS CAS~.g
A PUBLIC LANDS APP~ICATIONS
JERRY & LORI MAREK - 4829 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE:
TO INSTALL RIP RAP ON THE COMMONS
LAKESHORE ............................ 4418-4421
2
JERRY & LORI MAREK- 4829 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE:
TO INSTALL A SPRINKLING SUPPLY PIPE ACROSS
THE COMMONS .......................... 4422-4427
FRED JOHNSON - 4925 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE:
CITY CODE 320 VIOLATION .................. 4428-4436
B. REPLACEMENT OF STAIRWAYS AT WIOTA COMMONS. . 4437-4449
PETITION FOR SECURITY LIGHTLNG AT END OF CANARY
LANE ......................................... 4450
DISCUSSION ON CITIZEN REQUEST TO RENAME PRMBROKE
PARK TO DON SCHERVEN MEMORIAL PARK .............. 4451-4452
DISCUSSION ON ELIMINATION OF HENNEPIN COUNTY PRISONER
TRANSPORT SERVICE TO C1TIES ....................... 4453-4454
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Mcdiacom letter ................................... 4455
Article: Group Works to Change Attitudes Toward Public
Sector Employees ............................... 4456-4457
C. Information about the Tonka Cleanup Project ................. 4458
Call for applications for volunteers for the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities Transportation Advisory Board ................ 4459
E. Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative minutes: Sept 15.. 4460-4465
Fo
Mound Police Department San Diego Community Policing
presentation ................................. 4466-4486
4282
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PItONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
G. Financial Reports ~hough ~ept 2000 ...................
H. AMM FAX News ................................
I. LMCD minutes: Sept 27 ......................... 4492-4501
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council ~ll set a final agenda at the
meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web
site: www. cityofmound, com.
4283
COUNCIL BRIEFING
October 24, 2000
HRA Meeting
There is no redevelopment agenda at this HRA meeting. Pinky will be present to present her
agenda. If melnbers want to come and then leave for a time, that is fine. It will be a long wait.
Is it possible that Pat and Andrea could use the time to meet with me on the retirement proposal?
#1.C. Meeting Schedule
These meeting dates were arrived at at the last meeting, but require action. Added is the Open
ttouse for Storm Water Rates. Please put these dates on your calendars. Thanks!
#6. Smoke-Free Resolution
When this group asked for advice on how to telnper their request for an ordinance for smoke-free
parks, I advised thegn to instead request a resolution that supported healthy living through non-
smoking. Seemed harmless enough. ! was disappointed when their resolution went so far as to
again push for smoke-fi'ce parks and other public facilities and ask for the corresponding
signage. 1 atte~npted to reach Carol Weber on Friday to ask for her revision of this resolution~
That may be able to be achieved before the meeting on Tues. If not, she could be asked to revise
it accordingly and, as an inceutive, the Council could agree to publish the resolution.
Publication, which is normally not required for resolutions, would depict the City as a supporter
of healthy living, but mit to the extent of controlling the lifestyle of its citizens. The public could
perceive it as a good gesture.
#7. Dock and Commons Cases
Business slated for the Docks and Commons meeting scheduled for earlier this week was unable
to be done due to a lack ora quorum. Certain items are time sensitive, due to the time of year,
and Chair Jim Funk has authorized Staff to move those items directly to the Council. The Public
Lands Applications are of little consequence. The replacement of stairways at Wiota Commons
had the general support of the membership at earlier meetings. They were to consider the cost
estimates to be presented at this meeting. Both stairways can be installed yet this fall, at about a
third of earlier estimates. The petition for a slreet light would normally be on the consent
agenda. You are considering it independently because it has been combined with the stairway
issue.
Thank you for your consideration.
Kandis
MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2000
The City Council of the City of Mound, Henncpin County, Minnesota, met in regular session
on Tuesday, October 10, 2000, at 7:30 p.m., in ~c Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood
Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Pat Meisel; Council Membem: Andrea Ahrens, Bob Brown,
Mark I-Ianus, and Leah Weycker. Aim ia attendance were Acting City Attorney Bob Vose,
City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Planner Loren Gordon and Recording Secretary Diana
Mestad. The following interested citizens were also present: Ken and Sally Custer, Jo
Longpre, Lorrie Ham (The l.aker), David Olson, Terry Olson, Paul Holden, Bart Roeglin,
Rick Roberts, Peter Meyer, Phill Mitchum, Bill and Dorothy Netlm, David Greenslit, Shirley
Hawks.
*Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by
the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Meisel opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and welcomed the people in attendance. The
pledge of allegiance was recited.
APPROVE AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Meisel added Item I Update on Meeting Between the Mayor, the City Manager, and
Lisa Lynn of Lynn Associates.
Council Member Brown removed Item A from the Consent Agenda.
The City Manager removed Item D from the Consent Agenda.
MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Brown, to approve the agenda and consent agenda
with the amendments noted above. The roll call vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried. 5-0.
CONSENT AGENDA
*1.0 APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS.
Ahrens, Brown, unanimously.
*1.1 APPROVE A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF A
STREETLIGHT IN THE 6200 BLOCK OF WEST EDGE BOULEVARD.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-89 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST
FOR ~ INSTALLATION OF A STREET
'1.2
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 10, 2000
LIGHT IN THE 6200 BLOCK OF
WESTEDGE BLVD.
Ahrens, Brown, unanimously.
APPROVE A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE
LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY REGARDING
ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED DATA BASE
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE EXTENSION
AGREEMENT.
RESOLUTION//00-91
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN
EXTENSION OF THE LICENSE
AGREEMENT (#A14569) WITH HENNEPIN
COUNTY REGARDING ELECTRONIC
PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL
DIGITIZED DATA BASE (EPDB) AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
SIGN THE EXTENSION AGREEIVIENT
Ahrens, Brown, unanimously.
'1.3
PROCLAIM OCT. 16-22 AS MOUND MANUFACTURE'S WEEK.
PROCLAMATION//00-92 PROCLAIMING MOUND MANUFACTURERS 2000
Ahrens, Brown, unanimously.
1.4 APPROVE MINWI~: SEPTEMBER 26 REGULAR MEETING.
Council Member Brown mended page 12, paragraph 4 of the Minutes of September 26,
2000 to add the statement, ~ Council directs Staff to pursue changing the current code to
follow the state guidelines and bring the information back to Council. ~
MOTION, by Ahrens, seconded by Brown, to approve the Minutes of the
September 26, 2000 meetin~ as amended above. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried. 5-0.
1.5
APPROVE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TAX RATE INCREASE FOR
THE 2000 TAX LEVY, COLLECTABLE 1N 2001.
Gino Businaro, Finance Director stated that the Legislature requires a resolution to increase
2
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MI3tlflF,$- OCTOBER I0, 2000
the tax rate.
Council Member Hanus asked whether it was the opinion of the City Attorney that a public
hearing was not necessary. The Finance Director stated that this required a different type of
public hearing than usual and that the meeting tonight would take care of the public hearing
requirement.
Mayor Meisel asked if any of the citizens present wished to address the issue. There were
no comments from those present.
Council Member Weycker asked whether this would change the preliminary levy. The
Finance Director stated it would not change the levy and that the Council could lower the
mount if they chose. He stated that the estimated 2001 levy certification tax ram is 16.6 %.
Weycker moved and Brown seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//00-90
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TAX RATE
INCREASE FOR THE 2000 TAX LEVY,
COLLECTIBLE IN 2001
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0.
1.6
COMME~ AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ABOUT
SUBJECTS NOT ON THE AGENDA. (PLEASE LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER
SUBJECT.)
Bart Roeglin, 2260 West Edge, referred to an article in The Laker on September 30
regarding the West Edge Road improvement project. Mr. Roeglin stated that the article
referred to the need to improve the road because of the 75 home development. Mr. Roeglin
feels that because the builder is necessitating the improvement, the builder should pay for it.
He also feels that the builder and the City will be the ones who profit from the improvement.
Mr. Roeglin gave the Council Members information he had compiled regarding the costs and
how these could be fairly assessed to the builder and/or the city and asked that Council take
this information into consideration.
Rick Roberts, 2274 West Edge, stated that he agrees with Mr. Roeglin and also gave Council
a handout on his determination on how to assess the improvement. He wondered why
Mound residents were being asked to pay for the Minnetrista portion of the road. Mr.
Roberts suggested that since Minnetrista would have a new development along the same road
in the future, reimbursement of the cost should be sought.
Mayor Meisel stated that Agenda Item 6 would involve more information on the status of
Minnetrista's position on the West Edge improvement.
Mary Ann Sills, 2218 West Edge, stated that she agrees with both Mr. Roeglin and Mr.
Roberts. She stated that Rottlund and the City will benefit from the improvement and should
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 10, 2000
have to pay for it. She felt that this would negatively impact the existing homeowners.
Council Member Hanus pointed out that who will be paying what portion has not been
determined. There will be a public hearing held as part of the assessment process.
Mayor Meisel stated that Council appreciates input from citizens on this issue.
Council Member Hanus stated that he wanted the handouts from Mr. Roeglin and Mr.
Roberts to be included in the packets when the assessment is on the agenda for discussion.
1.7
DISCUSSION/ACTION ON STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR ORDINANCE
REVISION EXEMPTING CERTAIN SIGNS FROM THE REOUIREMENTS OF
SECTION 356 OF THE MOUND CODE.
MOTION, by Hanus, seconded by Brown, to send this issue to the PlsnninE
Commi.qsion for their recommendation. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried. 5-0.
1.8
STAFF REPORT: MEETING WITH CITY OF MINNETRISTA ON WEST
EDGE BOULEVARD AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY
LANGDON BAY SUBDIVISION.
The City Planner stated that a meeting was held with the Minnetrista City Council to discuss
the improvements on West Edge. He stated that Minnetrista seems to agree that
improvement is needed and they are concerned that the improvement be done right.
Minnetrista is in agreement with the need for a 30-foot road.
The City Planner further stated that there are still some technical issues to be worked through
including the impact on the existing driveways and concern about the impact on the wetlands.
These are items that will require more engineering work.
The City Planner stated that costs were not discussed at this meeting as it was felt there was
groundwork to complete first. The Minnetrista Council suggested looking at alternative
solutions to curbing in a rural setting.
Council Member Hanus stated that he wished Minnetrista would contribute money to the
project as they are asking for services. The City Manager stated that Minnetrista is working
with Mound on this.
Council Member Ahrens pointed out that what has been agreed on so far could blow up
when money is mentioned. Council Member Hanus stated that Minnetfista is suggesting curb
on their side of the road, but have made no mention of paying for it.
4
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 10, 2000
Mayor Meisel pointed out that Minnetrista's developer is involved in the discussions. The
City Planner stated that it was possible that a developer payment swap could work out
between the two cities.
Council Member Weycker stated that she wanted Staff to look at creative financing for tiffs
including adding up the total frontage of lots. The City Planner stated that the City Engineer
would run different number scenarios for the project.
The City Planner stated that the next step was to get feedback from Council, obtain
agreements for joint powers, and the granting of easements.
Mayor Meisel and Council Member Brown both urged the City Planner to talk about cost
and payment in future discussions with Minnetrista.
The City Manager stated there would be an information meeting for south of the track
residents. Council Member Hanus stated that he was concerned about the south area. He
stated that Mound has no controlling authority over the developer, but the traffic will be
going over Mound's street. He felt it was important that Staff not lose sight of this issue.
Mayor Meisel agreed with Council Member Hanus that Minnetrista needs to work with
Mound on the south development.
Council Member Brown asked whether there has been any discussion about the railroad
trestle. The City Planner stated that the Minnetrista developer has some thoughts on
reworking the trestle and is optimistic that the railroad will abandon it and allow Hennepin
County Parks to take it over. The City Planner stated that he feels this is many years out
and will have an impact on the timing of this project.
Mary Sills asked the Council how developers could come this far with a project without
having discussed money. Mayor Meisel stated that everything to date was preliminary
information gathering and no permits had been issued.
Ms. Sills asked if it was still Rottlund's intention to have a model home open before
snowfall. The City Planner stated there were a lot of things up in the air at this point, but it
was possible one model home could be built. This would be done at the developer's risk and
would not tie the City to anything.
1.9
DISCUSSION/ACTION ON PROPOSED AME~~ TO THE
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PERTAINING TO PERSONNEL.
The City Manager stated that meetings have been held over the last few months between the
two committees. One committee consisted of nonunion staff and the other was made up of
the Mayor, Council Member Ahrens, and the City Manager. The recommendation from the
two committees is included in the meeting packet.
Council Member Ahrens stated that it was the intention of the committees to mirror the labor
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 10, 2000
agreements with the union. Mayor Meisel stated that some items were updated and some
were putting current practice into writing.
Council Member Brown stated that he felt the life insurance provision and the number of
vacation days were an issue. Mayor Meisel replied that these were standard amounts.
Council Member Weycker asked whether a cost comparison was done. The Finance Director
stated that he did not calculate the numbers. He further stated that the 2001 budget includes
all the requests that translate into dollars.
Council Member Brown asked for clarification that the holiday rate of pay was 3.5 times the
standard rate. The City Manager stated it was 2.5 times standard rate across the board.
Council Member Hanus asked whether employees had an option of taking comp time instead
of pay.
The City Manager stated that if City Hall is closed; i.e., inclement weather, then the City
would compensate employees.
Council Member Brown asked how these provisions matched up to what the City's police
officers received. Council Member Ahrens stated this was mirrored after their contract.
The City Manager stated that a thorough analysis of this had been done and that most of the
administrative staff are salaried. The 2.5 times pay would only involve emergency situations
such as needing phone coverage on a holiday and would be very rare.
Council Member Hanus asked about whether employees could carryover vacation time. The
Finance Director stated they could carry 1.5 of the total yearly accrual.
Council Member I-Ianus stated that in the private sector vacations serve an important purpose
of giving employees a break from their job.
Council Member Ahrens stated that language requiring supervisor approval to carry over
vacation time was still in the code. The City Manager stated that staff is encouraged to take
vacation time.
Hanus moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//00-93
RESOLUTION AMENDING TIlE CITY OF MOUND
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AS PRESENTED
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.10 DISCUSSION OF WETLANDS FUNCTIONS AND VALUES ASSESSMENT
UPDATE.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 10, 2000
The City Manager pointed out the memo on page 4223 of the meeting packet from Dan
Parks outlining the status on this. The MCWD will be deciding whether to include Mound
in a grant program and do consider Mound to be one of its top priorities. The Met Council
has committed $10,000 in matching funds for the City. The MCWD is a fully funded grant.
1.11 DISCUSSION OF LMCD PROPOSAL FOR FUNDING ADDITIONAL WATER
PATROL FOR LAKE MINNETONKA.
Council Member Ahrens stated that the City of Minnetonka held a meeting on this issue and
seemed to be using the letter sent out by Mound as a reference. She further stated that
initially the LMCD had asked for 50% and now were down to 30%. The LMCD has asked
her to bring the new proposal back to Council.
Council Member Hanus stated that he felt the letter Mound sent to the other cities has had an
impact. He further stated that reducing the amount requested does not change the points that
Mound has made in the letter.
Council Member Brown pointed out that this would not add extra deputies on Lake
Minnetonka. Council Member Hanus agreed and stated that the resolution was carefully
worded to avoid mentioning "the lake."
Council Member Ahrens stated that the LMCD has said publicly that they will spend the
same hours on the lake.
Council Member Hanus pointed out that the LMCD would be taking more money out of the
Save the Lake Fund and so the dollars would still be coming from the cities in a round about
way.
Council Member Ahrens stated that Spring Park is now reconsidering its decision.
Council Member Hanus stated that cities want assurance that the deputies will stay on the
lake.
Council Member Ahrens asked if it was Council's consensus that the lower amount requested
does not change the points of the letter and the City's response remains unchanged. Council
agreed that this was the consensus.
1.12 DISCUSSION OF NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER MEETING DATES.
The City Manager stated that there were no issues in November, but she wanted Council to
look at December 26, which would be a regular meeting night. Council Member Ahrens
stated that the second meeting in December is always cancelled.
The City Manager stated that she was aware of the tradition of canceling this meeting, but
7
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 10, 2000
was concerned about the Council achieving its goals.
Mayor Meisel asked what issues would be outstanding at that time. The City Manager stated
that fees, development, the second part of the administrative code and the budget were some
of the items.
Mayor Meisel pointed out that the Council would need to meet on November 8 for vote
canvassing. Council Member Ahrens suggested combining that meeting with a November
council meeting.
The City Manager confirmed the following schedule:
October 24
November 8
November 14
November 28
December 4
December 11
December 12
December 26
Council Meeting
Vote canvassing and Council Meeting
Cancel regular Council Meeting
Council Meeting
Truth in Taxation Meeting and Council Meeting
Follow up meeting for Taxation if necessary
Council Meeting
Cancel regular Council Meeting
The City Manager inquired about dates for January meetings. Council Member Hanus stated
these meetings usually follow the standard schedule.
The City Manager pointed out that Council members would be out of office at year-end and
suggested a meeting the first week of January to swear in new members. Council Member
Hanus stated that would only be necessary in the event of an emergency and that new council
could be sworn in at an emergency meeting if necessary.
Council Member Hanus stated there would be at least two Council members still in office
after year-end and they could call a special meeting if necessary. The City Manager stated
that the two Council members needed to be available for that time period.
1.13 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. THE EHLERS ADVISOR.
B. NOTICE FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF ENDING TRANSPORT
SERVICE.
Council Member Ahrens pointed out that the County was dropping this service, but was not
lowering the cost. She asked the City Manager to check whether or not Mound had been
using this service.
Council Member Brown stated that it was his experience that Mound would call the County
for transport, but if it were not available, two reservists would transport the prisoner.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- OCTOBER 10, 2000
The City Manager stated that she would get clarification on this issue.
Council Member Hanus stated that if Mound had been using this service, the City should
respond to the letter. I-Ie felt that no notice for planning purposes had been given and he
thought the County Board should be copied on any such letter.
C. MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT I/qVES~ ACCOUNT REVIEW THROUGH
8/00.
D. LETTER OF THANKS TO MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFF.
E. ARTICLE: COUNCIL-MANAGER RELATIONS IN SMALL COMMUNITIES.
F. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 25, 2000.
G. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT: SEPTEMBER 2000.
H. LMCD CORRESPONDENCE.
I. UPDATE ON MEETING WITH THE MAYOR, THE CITY MANAGER, AND
LISA LYNN FROM LYNN ASSOCIATES.
Mayor Meisel stated that at the time of the City Manager's hiring, she had agreed to a six-
month review process. She stated that in the past, the City Manager has not had a review
and so no framework is set for this process. Lynn Associates offers a review process
specifically for city managers for a total cost of $250. After reviewing the process, the
Mayor is recommending going forward with it.
Mayor Meisel stated that the review process involves tabulated responses and a presentation
to Council, and a 360-degree format including comments from commissions, business
owners, and residents. Mayor Meisel pointed out that because the City Manager had only
been employed for six months, the circle might be somewhat smaller on this review.
The City Manager stated that this is a development tool to help the growth of a City
Manager. There are 10 to 12 categories and the forms sent out are very basic and in plain
language. Questions involve asking what is being done right and what areas are being
overlooked.
Council Member Hanus asked what precautions were taken so that information was not lost
in the tabulation process. The MaYor stated that no comments would be lost and that forms
are signed so that the facilitator can clarify any unclear comments. The comments, however,
remain anonymous to the City Manager and all others involved.
Council Member Hanus asked if there was an oppommity to comment further after the
results were known. The Mayor stated that the end result would be that Council would work
with the City Manager on any issues.
9
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINU'IE~- OCTOBER 10, 2000
Council Member Brown stated that he has requested in the past a closed workshop to discuss
issues with the City Manager. The Mayor stated that she has not forgotten about the
workshop, but that the City Manager has only had six months to get a feel for the job and is
not ready for this yet.
The City Manager agreed that she needs more time with her staff, but that she is doing some
tracking and working on the idea of a workshop.
Council Member Brown stated that there were issues prior to the City Manager's arrival to
be discussed. Mayor Meisel stated that these could be discussed one on one, but not in a
workshop format at this time.
Council Member Hanus asked whether the facilitator would go over the results with the City
Manager. The City Manager stated that she would be receiving one on one coaching as part
of this process and that it is also a professional development tool.
Council Member Hanus asked if the League of Cities sponsored this company. The City
Manager stated that this was a private company and was recommended by Jim Prosser.
Council Member Ahrens stated that the 360-degree review is considered state of the art and
wondered what that would encompass. The City Manager stated that staff, the community,
businesses, and commission heads would all be involved.
AD.TOURNMENT:
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Ahreus to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0.
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
10
BUDGET WORKSHOP MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 16, 2000
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met FOR A
Workshop session on the 2001 Budget on Monday, October 16, 2000 at 6:00 p.m., in the
Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. The Mayor called the meeting to
order at 6:35 P.M.
Those present were: Mayor Pat Meisel, Council Members: Andrea Ahrens, Bob Brown,
Mark I-Ianus and Leah Weycker. Councilmember Bob Brown was absent and excused.
Also in attendance were City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Fran Clark, Finance
Director Gino Businaro; Park Director Jim Fackler, Police Chief Len Harrell, Public Works
Supt. Greg Skinner, Building Official Jon Sutherland and Park Commissioner Peter Meyer.
The Council discussed various aspects of the current proposed 2001 Budget. Concensus was
that the Council was comfortable with the proposed Budget as presented.
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Weycker to adjourn at 10:05 P.M. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
PAYMENT BILLS
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
BILLS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
BATCH #
#OlOl
AMOUNT
_$183,576.04
TOTAL BILLS $183,576.04
PAGE 1
AP-C02-O1
PURCHASE
CITY OF HOUND
J (.} U R N A L
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
AOlll 000100
io/2~76o io/24/oo
7.81 09-00 296-9058 BUSINARO GINO
26.00 09-00 590-4351 SKINNER GREG
20.00 09-00 590-4351 SKINNER GREG
25.99 09-00 590-4351 SKINNER GREG
11.76 09-00 965-6789 HANSON, KANDIS
7.9I 09-00 554-6520 PUBLIC WORKS
7.90 09-00 554-6520 PUBLIC WORKS
27.88 09-00 581-2110 PATROL #845
28.66 '~-0~ 581L640i HARRELL LEN
27.08 09-00 581-6404 BLAZER
27.08 09-00 581-6440 SQUAD #840
~7~-~ .... 0~-00 581-6441 SQUAD #841
27.08 09-00 581-6442 SNUAD #842
27.08 09-00 581-6443 SQUAD #843
33.55 09-00 581-6444 SQUAD ~844
.39 09-00 723-7560 MOUND FIRE
.87 09-00 751-3572 ENGINE #i8
1.99 09-00 751-3573 MOUND FIRE
7.81 09-00 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCK
57.58 09-00 581-6405 INVESTIGATORS
407.50 JRNL-CD
~TOUCH CELLULAR/BELLEVUE VENDOR TOTAL
407.50
B0530 56256
i0/24/00 10/24/00
44.78 FLOWERS, KRUM~ JOEL
44.78 JRNL-CD
BAYSIDE FLORAL VENDOR TOTAL 44.78
B0549 19866200
10/24/00 10/24/00
1,304.95 LIQUOR
1,304.95 JRNL-CD
19911000
10/24/00 10/24/00
2,615.54 LIQUOR
2,615.54 JRNL-CD
5ELL~OY CORPORATION
VENDOR TOTAL 3920.49
B0580 197582 83.34 55 GALLONS OIL
83.34 55 GALLONS OIL
83.33 55 GALLONS OIL
10/24/00 10/24/00 250.0i JRNL-CD
~ILL CLARK OIL COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 250.01
bO600 10062408
31.66 09-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMRO120
31.66 09-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMROi20
31.67 09-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMROI20
[0/24/00 10/24/00 94.99 JRNL-CD
10062469
67.01
10/24/00 lO/2A/~ .......... 67-.01
09-00 GARBAGE P]CKUP CMROi2i
JRNL-CD
10062523
10/24/00 10/24/00
105.21 09-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMR0308
105.21 JRNL-CD
i0062937
17.76 09-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CHPO085
ACCOUNT NUMBER
01-4090-3220
01-4280-3220
73-7300-3220
78-7800-3220
01-4040-3220
73-7300-3220
78-7800-3220
01-4140-3220
01-4140-3220
01-4140-3220
01-4140-3220
01-4140-3220
01-4~40-3220
01-4140-3220
01-4140-3220
22-4170-3220
22-4170-3220
22-4170-3220
22-4170-3220
01~4140~3220 .....
lOlO
01-4020-4100
1010
71-7100-9510
1010
71-7100-9510
lOlO
01-4280-2250
73-7300-2250
78-7800-2250
1010
01-4280-3750
73-7300-3750
78-7800-3750
IOiO
22-4170-3750
1010
01-4340-3750
1010
71-7100-3750
PAGE 2
AP-C02-01
PURCHASE
CITY OF MOUND
JOURNAL
VENDOR INVOICE
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE
DUE HOLD
DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
10/24/00 10/24/00
17.76 JRNL-CD
10062393
............ 67~07--~9Z~' GARBAGE
10/24/00 10/24/00 67°07 JRNL-CD
PICKUP CHPO045
BLACKOWIAK AND SON
B0760 001017
10/2~00 10124/00
60.00 09-1_2_-0Q_~0_~-26-00,i0-i0-00 VID
60.00 JRNL-CD
5URT, EARL R. VENDOR TOTAL 60.~ ...............
C0859 D61275 13.02
10/24/00 i0/24/00 i3.02
POLES, ETC
D61349
10/24100 10/24/00
7.44 POLES, ETC
7.44 JRNL-CD
D62448
10/24/00 10/24/00
5.30 MOUNTING GROMMET
5.30 JRNL-CD
CHAMPION AUTO
VENDOR TOTAL 25.76
~0'~60 000928
10/24/00 10/24/00
3,427.5~----~9---~EXL ESTATE SERVICES
3,427.50 JRNL-CD
--C~'~-; C. COHPANY~ THE ..... V~NDOR TOTAL
3427.50
C0923 001004
10/24/00 10/24/00
500.00 SEMINAR PURSUIT DRIVING
500.00 3RNL-CD
CITY OF WAYZATA VENDOR TOTAL
C0960 000930
500.00
49.07 MISCELLANEOUS
43.28 MISCELLANEOUS
......... ~.6~- H~SCELLANEOUS
30.08 HISCELLANEOUS
30.08 MISCELLANEOUS
....... 30.~--~scE~L~NEOUS
52.29 MISCELLANEOUS
9.36 MISCELLANEOUS
2.77 MISCELLANEOUS
14.53 MISCELLANEOUS
14.99 MISCELLANEOUS
1.80 MISCELLANEOUS
4.99 MISCELLANEOUS
74.50 MISCELLANEOUS
10.20 MISCELLANEOUS
174.22 MISCELLANEOUS
10/24/00 i0/24/00 579.82 JRNL-CD
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
COAST TO COAST
VENDOR TOTAL 579.82
C0970 61361136
10/24/00 10/24/00
94.40 MIX TAXABLE
94.40 JRNL-CD
ACCOUNT NUMBER
1010
01-4280-3750
lOlO
01-4030-3100
1010
73-7300-2310
lOlO.
01-4280-2310
1010
01-4280-2310
lOlO
55-5879-3100
10~
01-4140-4110
1010
01-4340-2200
01-4340-3820
01-4340-2300
01-4280-2250
73-7300-2250
78-7800-2250
73-7300-2300
01-4280-2300
73-7300-2310
78-7800-2200
01-4280-2200
73-7300-2200
78-7800-2300
71-7100-2200
01-4060-2100
22-4170-2200
1010
71-7100-9540
1010
2 375.50
PAGE 3
AP-C02-Oi
PURCHASE JOURNAL
C_ I_. T Y O__F__ M_O U ND. _ _
VENDOR
NO.
INVOICE DUE HOLD
INVOICE NMBR DATE .... ~DATE STATUS
AM 0 U~N_T~_ DE. SC R [.P_T_I ON_.
61366093
10/24100 10/24/00
88.56 MIX TAXABLE
COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST VENDOR TOTAL
i82.96
~i020 001130
10124/00 10/24/00
323.3~ ~-60 FRINcIPLE TRUE VALUE
638.48 11-00 INTEREST TRUE VALUE
961.84 JRNL-CD
CONCO, INCORPORATED VENDOR TOTAL
961.84
D!173 001013
10/24100 10/24/00
75.00 REIMBURSEMENT BOOT ALLOWANCE
75.00 JRNL-CD
--D A~-~-'-HAR D INA ......... V~-N~OR TOT AL
75.00
D1200 111957
1 o / 24 / o o ~-o-72 ~.'7o~-
636.75 BEER
111970
10/2~766 lO/24/oo
64.30 MISCELLANEOUS
64.30 JRNL-CD
112686
i0/24/00 i0/24/00
1,430.80 BEER
1,430.80 JRNL=CD
112698
10/24/00 10124/00
18.40 MIX TAXABLE
18.40 JRNL-CD
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
VENDOR TOTAL
2150.25
D1280 802-80202019
10/24/00 10124/00
60.93 PARKING LOT PAINT
60.93 JRNL-CD
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS
VENDOR TOTAL 60.93
E1420 692256
10/24100 10/24/00
169.25 BE~R
i69.25 JRNL-CD
693527
10/24/00 10/24/00
~l--,-~T. lO- BEER
1,957.10 JRNL-CD
693528
45.25 MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE
10/24/00 10/24/00 45.25 JRNL-CD
694906
..... 3~,66-'-BEER KEGS
10/24/o0 10/24/00 369.00 JRNL-CD
696538
....... ~-, 275~i0-BEER
10/24/00 10/24/00 2,275.10 JRNL-CD
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
VENDOR TOTAL 4815.70
E1485 S258/101300
lO/24/o0
852.00 10-01-00 THRU
.............. 852.00 JRNL-CD
02-28-01 MAINTEN
ACCOUNT NUMBER
71-7100-9540
1010
55-5881-6100
55-5881-6110
1010_ _
73-7300-2240
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
71-7100-9550
lOlO
71-7100-9530
lOlO
71-7100-9540
1010
01-4280-2360
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
71-7100-9550
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
01-4320-3800
lo10
PAGE 4
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE
NM B R
INVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE DATE STATUS
PURCHASE JOURNAL
_E~I_TY_ OF MOUND
_~.OU~__DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
E1502 O0-131&
EVERGREEN LAND
F1655 297070
297678
FOR A SAFER
~i-7Y~ 0Ol o16
FRANK HEITZ
10/2~')0~--i~/24100
SERVICES CO VENDOR TOTAL
10/24/00 10/24/00
10/24/00 10/24/00
AMERICA VENDOR TOTAL
10/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
i30.00
130.00 JRNL-CD
130.00
0_9.=16~00 THRU 09-29-00 PRO MAN
416.40 CRAYONS
416.40 JRN~r~D
352.69 COLORING BOOKS
352.6~_ J~NL-CD
769.09
75.00 REIMBUR~ BOOT ALLOWANCE
75.00 JRNL-CD
75.00
55-5583-3100
1010
22-4170-2280
1010
22-4170-2280
1010
01-4280-2240
1010
G1750 437671
450264
450265
450263
443936
450262
427241
437672
10/24/00 10/24/00
i9.82 i0-03-00 MATS
19.82 10-03-00 MATS
19.83 10-03-00 MATS
2~.~__~=~_~_QQ._.UNIFORMS
24.76 I0-03-00 UNIFORMS
24.76 10-03-00 UNIFORMS
133.75 JR_I~
01-4280-2250 .........
73-7300-2250
78-7800-2250
01-4280-2240
73-7300-224[
78-7800-2240
1010
30.43 i0-17-00 MATS
10/24/00 !O./~.~Z~O 30.43 J~NL-CD
22-4170-2230
1010
21.18 10-17-00 MATS
10 / 24_/_p_0___1_0/24/00 21 -.~L JR__N_.L-_CD .....
71-7100-4210
. 1010
37.24 10-17-00 MATS
i0/24/00 10/24/00 37.24 JRNL-CD
01-4340-2330
1010
11.47 10-10-00 MATS 01-4280-2250
11.47 lO-lO-O0 MATS 73-7300-2250
11.48 iO-lO~O0 MATS 78-7800-2250
24.76 lO-iO-O0 UNIFORMS 01-4280-2240
24.76 lO-lO-O0 UNIFORMS 73-7300-2240
............... 2~76 10-10-00 UNIFORMS 78-7800-2240
10/24/00 i0/24/00 i08.70 JRNL-CD iOiO
20.64 10-17-00 MATS
20.64 10-17-00 MATS
20.63 iO-17-O0 MATS
24.76 i0-17-00 UNIFORMS
24.76 iO-17-O0 UNIFORMS
24.76 10-I7-00 UNIFORMS
10/24/00 i0/24/00 i36.i9 JRNL-CD
01-4280-2250
73-7300-2250
78-7800-2250
01-4280-2240
73-7300-2240
78-7800-2240
lOiO
28.52 09-19-00 MATS
10/24/00 10/2~/00 ......... 26.52 JRNL-CD
22-4170-2200
1010
37.72 10-03-00 MATS
01-4320-4210
' '78-7~00-2300
375.50 .00
PAGE 5
AP-C02-Oi
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MOUND
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE NMBR
INVOICE
DATE
DUE HOLD
DATE STATUS AMO~__D. ESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER
437673
10/24/00 10/24/00 37.72 JRNL-CD lOiO
..... 30.14 i0-03-00- MATS 22-4170-2200
i0/24/00 10/24/00 30.i4 JRNL-CD 1010
G & K SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL
563.87
G1825 001004
10/24/00 10/24/00
GENERAL PLUMBING AND HEATI VENDOR TOTAL
128~00 REFUND ~_UP~ICATE PERMIT . _ 01-3254-0000 __
40.00 REFUND DUPLICATE PERMIT 01-3254-0000
.50 REFUND DUPLICATE PERMIT 01-2222-0000
I_6.~_~O~J~NL-CD_ 1010
i68.50
--G189~- 001010
10/24/00 10/24/00
67.87 WAT~R #~00 22'4~70'41O0 ' -
67.87 JRNL-CD 1010
'~[EN'WO OD INGL EWOOD
VENDOR TOTAL
67.87
L905 90504
10124~00 10/24/00
97.60
97.60
195.20
09:0_~ L~.T~ ................ 73-7300-31~5
09-00 LOCATES 78-7800-3125
JRNL-CD 1010
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, INC VENDOR TOTAL
i95.20
G1972 277228
10/24~0 ~/24/00
159.05 WINE 71-7100-9520
159.05 J~WL=c6 ...... 1010 "
278029
10/24100 10/24100
1,370.56 LI ~UOR 71-7100-9510
1,370.56 JRNL-CD 1010
278134
10/24/00 10/24/00
628.75 WINE 7i-7100-9520
628.75 JRNL-CD 1010
278135
lO/24/oo -i-o/~%/oo
189.00 WINE 71-7100-9520
i~.~---J~-~L-CD 1010
280398
lO/24/~6-'-f6~24/00
1,662.04 WINE 71-7100-9520
1,662. O~-~R ~C-D' 1010
280399
10/24/00 1'0/24/00
289.85 WINE 71-7100-9520
289.85 JRNL-CD 1010
281255
1o/24/oo'~d72~,/6o
126.30 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510
i~g.--3~--'JRNL-CD 1010
GRIGGS COOPER & COMPANY
VENDOR TOTAL 4425.55
G1977
001010
10124100 10/24/00
397.91 THRU iO-lO-O0 472-3555
397.91 JRNL-CD
22-4170-3220
1010
OOlOiO-B
001007
10/24/00 10/24/00
37.27 THRU 10-10-00 472-0646
37.27 JRNL-CD
102.70 THRU ]0-07--00 RAHN ]NTERNFT
01-4340-3220
1010
PAGE 6
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
PURCHASE
CITY 0~_ .MO UND
AMOUNT .D~.~C~IPTION
JOURNAL
G T E MINNESOTA VENDOR TOTAL
H2080 27977
10/24/00 10/24/00
27980
10/24/00 i0/24/00
HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP VENDOR TOTAL
H2i35 20097031
10/24/00 10/24/00
-~--N~ED'~N CTY. INFO TEC~ .... ~ENDOR TOTAL
H2151 2000-100
10/24/00 ['~4/00
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER VENDOR TOTAL
H2283 5021797
i0/24/00
537.88
44.47 HOSE
44.47 JRNL-CD
85.00 WELD ALUMINUM RIM
85.00 JRNL-CD
129.47
40.-~'--~=-0~' NETWORK SUPPORT
40.18 JRNL-CD
40.18
103.75 LABELS 600' AROUND GREENWAY
i03.75 JRNL-CD
i03.75
24.03 LUMBER
28.03 OUTSIDE READER WIRE
52.06 JRNL-CD
7022005
HOME DEPOT/GECF
10/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
24.03 GARBAGE CAN LIDS
30.30 WIRE
54.33 JRNL-CD
106.39
I2309 23767979
23767961
10 /24 / o-~ --i-o~)-4/o o
10/24/00 10/24/00
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
I2384 10005206
VENDOR TOTAL
10005207
10/24/00 10/24/00
124.38
124.38
lO-lO-O0 THRU II-lO-O0 COPIER
JRNL-CD
493.33 10-10-00 THRU 11-10-00 COPIER
493.33 JRNL-CD
617.71
10/24/00 i0/24/00
157.51 BATTERIES (2)
~57__..5~ .... JRNL-CD
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
I2400 6045
6058
6146
78.76 BATTERY
78.76 JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL 236.27
395.02 INSTALL PINION BEARINGS, ETC
10/24/00 10/24/00 395.02 JRNL-CD
80.95
10/24/00 10/24/00 80.95
MOUN~'-~ND-BALANCE TIRES
JRNL-CD
i0/24/00 10124/00
94.19'- iNSTALL DUAL HORNS
94.19 JRNL-CD
ACCOUNT NUMBER
73-7300-3800
1010
73-7300-3800
1010
01-4095-3800
lOIO
30-5640-3100
lO10
01-4280-3750
73-7300-2300
101_
01-4280-3750
73-7300-2300
1010
01-4320r_3800 ....
1010
01-4320-3800
lOiO
01-4280-2310
1010
01-4280-2310
1010
73-7300-3810
1010
78-7800-3810
1010
01-4280-3810
lOlO
PAGE 7 P U
AP-C02-01
R C H A S E J C U R N A L
CITY OF MOUND
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUN~ .... DESCRIPTION,
6155
6196
10/24/00 10/24/00
10 / 24 / 00
301.70 FILTER ASSY REMOVE INTAKE
301.70 __JR I_~_L _-Cp ....
102.49 SWITCH ASSY R&R SWITCH ETC
__ 1~02__. 49__ JR..NL-CD
6145
lo/2R!o_qo~o/24/oo
13.00 FLAT TIRE REPAIR
13.00 J~L~CQ
6053
10/24/00 10/24/00
7i.oi FUEL CAP ETC.
6056
10/24/00 10/24/00
215.53 WHEEL ALIGNMENT ETC.
215.53 JRNL-CD
6113
10124100 10124/00
25.86 CHANGE OIL, ETC.
25.86 _~L.:.CO_ .
6129
10/24/00 10/24/00
25.86 CHANGE OIL, ETC.
25.86 JRNL-CD
6166
10/24/00 10/24/00
6175
10/24/00 i0/24/00
ISLAND PARK SKELLY VENDOR TOTAL
25.86 CHANGE OIL, ETC
25.86 JRNL-CD
171.50 REAR BRAKE JOB, ETC.
171.50 JRNL-CD
1522.97
J2514 001006
10124~00 10124100
75.00 REIMBURSEMENT BOOT ALLOWANCE
75.00 JRNL-CD
'-JERRY HENKE
VENDOR TOTAL
75.00
J2579
1169152 1,635.44 LIQUOR
10/24/00 10/24/00 i ;~'3-~ ~-~ 3RNL-CD
1169153 241.05 WINE
].0/24Z00 ¥b724/00 241.05 -]R~,~L--C'D"
1169154 29.99 MISCELLANEOUS NON-TAXABLE
10/24/00 10/2~-/00 2~.99-- JRNL-CD
1169155 2,711.16 WINE
10/24/00 i0/24/00 2,711.16 JRNL-CD
1169156 1,748.95 WINE
10/24/00 i0-i24'70'0 ......... ~748-.95- JRNL~CD
1171948 1,449.90 LIQUOR
1171949 696.05 WINE
10/24/00 10/2426~ ........... 696.05 JRNL-CD
P~
ACCOUNT NUMSER
73-7300-3810
78-7800-3810
1010
01-4340-3820
01-4140-3810
01-4140-3810
01-4140-3810
1010
01-4140-3~10
01-4140-3810
1010
01-4140-3810
73-7300-2240
1010
71-7100-9510
1010
71-7100-9520
1010
71-7100-9550
1010
71-7100-9520
1010
71-7100-9520
1010
71-7100-9510
1010
71-7100-9520
1010
PAGE 8
AP-C02-O1
VEHDOR I NVO I CE
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE
PURCHASE
C.ITy_..OF MOUND
DUE HOLD
. DA_T__E _._S__TATU_S_.__.A_M_OL~NT _. DE SCR I PT I ON
JOURNAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
J2582 001101
10/24/00 10/24/00
JOHNSON, PHYLLIS
L2770 000913
10/24/00 10/24/00
LAKE MINNETONAK CONVERSAT! VENDOR TOTAL
ll_8_.2_.4___.ll_~O_O__PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE
550.87 11-00 INTREST TRUE VALUE
669.11 JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL 669.11
L2811 11248
10/24/00 10/24/00
11260
10/24/00 10/24/00
LARSON PRINTING & GRAPHICS VENDOR TOTAL
~[2~2-i400925
1401599
10124100
10/24/00 10/24/00
LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC.
VENDOR TOTAL
10124/00 10/24/00
L2840 000927
10/24/00 10/24/00
~/E N-[~O R TOTAL
001017
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
55-5881-6100
55-5881-6110
1010
4,054.29 4TH ~TR 2000 LEVY PAYMENT
4,054.29 JRNL-CD
01-4020-4130
1010
4054.29
111.29 MOUND VISIONS PRINTING
111.29 JRNL-CD
01-4020-3500
_ 1010.
76.01 RESCUE REPORTS 22-4170-3500
76.01 JRNL-CD 1010
187.30
109.41 MISCELLANEOUS E~UIPMENT 01-4280-2250
109.41 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 73-7300-2250
109.41 MISCELLANEOUS E~UIPMENT 78-7800-2250
328.23 JRNL-CD lOi
12.50 MISCELLANEOUS E@UIPMENT
12.50 MI~E[LA~E~OS--E~UIPMENY'
12.51 MISCELLANEOUS E~UIPMENT
37.51 JRNL-CD
01-4280-2250
73-7300-2250
78-7800-2250
1010
365.74
6,103.00 2000-20~i--H E'HBE RSH I P DUES
6,i03.00 JRNL-CD
01-4020'4130
1010
60.00 REGISTRATION
60.00 JRNL-CD
01-4090-4120
1010
6163.00
L2851 4477
10/24/00 10/24/00
1,358.12 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
547.46 4T-H' INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
543.25 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
101.07 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
3,~.2--O--~'-INSTALL 02'00 THRU 02-01
54.75 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
543.25 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
.... ~?~.~7' 4T-H INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
218.98 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
863.30 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
3,800.62 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
4,063.82 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-0i
2,96~.9i 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-0i
2,968.90 4TH INSTALL 02-00 THRU 02-01
25,231.50 JRNL-CD
01-4020-3610
01-4040-3610
01-4090-3610
01-4110-3610
01-4140-3610
01-4150-3610
01-4190-3610
01-4280-3610
01-4320-3610
01-4340-3610
22-4170-3610
71-7100-3610
73-7300-3610
78-7800-3610
lOiO
PAGE 9 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L
AR-C02-01 CITY OF_ ~QUND .....
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS T* VENDOR TOTAL 25231.50
L2926 017277
10/24100 10/24/00
7.63-- 6i-[,--F fFING GAUGE
7.63 OIL, FILING GAUGE
7.63 OIL, FILING GAUGE
22.89 JRNL-CD
017326
10/24/00 10/24/00
137.74 CONCRETE SAW BLADES
177.74 CO~-RE~'~ §~ BLADES
137.74 CONCRETE SAW BLADES
413.22 JRNL-CD
LONG LAKE POWER E@UIPMENT VENDOR TOTAL
436.11
5-301522
10/24/00 10/24/00
49.02 OI sK-~A-D-~T~ 'ET~
49.02 JRNL-CD
5-301527
10/24/00 10/24/00
30.57 ROTOR
30.57 JRNL-CD
..... ~302656 ........
10/24/00 10/24/00
17.88 ROTOR
17.88 JRNL-CD
5-3O2651
10124/00 10/24/00
158.41 ROTORS, DISK PAD SETS
158.41 JRNL-CD
5-303908
10/24/00 10124100
2.81 PLUG
2.81 JRNL-CD
L'OWELL'S AUTOMOTIVE/ZITCO* VENDOR TOTAL
258.69
M2965 000928
10/24/00 10/24/00
78.12 THRU 09-28-00 LONG DISTANCE
78.i2 JRNL-CD
M.C.I. WORLDCOM VENDOR TOTAL 78.12
M3016 8247
~0/24/00 i0/24/00
14.70 10-02-00 DELIVERY CHARGE
i4.70 JRNL-CD
8264
8277
182.70 i0-05-00 DELIVERY CHARGE
10/24/00 10/24/00 i82.70 JRNL-CD
10124/00 10/24/00
9.80 i0-09-00 DELIVERY CHARGE
9.80 JRNL-CD
8300
qARLIN'S TNUCKING
91.00
i0/24/00 10/24/00 91.00
VENDOR TOTAL 298.20
10-12-00 DELIVERY CHARGE
JRNL-CD
M3030 M3030
10/24/00 10/24/00
--1,47~-~-~--~EEff -
1,475.10 JRNL-CD
206500
39.25
10/24/00 10/24/00 39.25
MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE
JRNL-CD
01-4280-2250
73-7300-2250
78-7800-2250
1010
01-4280-2250_
73-7300-2250
78-7800-2250
1010
olL414o-38io
1010
01-4140-3810
1010
1010
01-4140-3810
1010
01L4280,~'~'~
1010
22-4170%3220 .......
1010
71-7100-9600
1010
71-7100-9600
1010
71-7100-9600
1010
71-7100-9600
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
71-7100-9550
1010
PAGE 10 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L
AP-C02-O1 ....... C!.TY OF MOUND
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS__AMOU~_ DESCRIPTION
207577 2,026.60 BEER
207578 92.00 LIQUOR
10/24/00 10124100 ~2o00 JR~L-CD
MARK Vli DISTRIBUTOR VENDOR TOTAL 3632.95
'~08~ 34404 ...... 2,797.80-~00 M~LANEOUS ENGINEERIN
10/24/00 10/24/00 2,797.80 JRNL-CD
34405
10/24/00 i0/24/00
34434
34435
34436
34437
34438
34439
34440
3444i
34442
34443
34444
34445
34446
34447
10/24/00 10/24/00
10/24/00 10/24/00
10/24/00 10/24/00
10/24/00 10/24/00
10/24/00 10/24/00
10124/00 10/24/00
i0/24/00 10124100
10/24/00 10/24/00
675'~---6~-O-"MisCELLANEOUS ENGINEERIN
675.00 JRNL-CD
135.00-~----O-~--~TER'MAIN EXTENSION
135.00 JRNL-CD
325.20 '~9~0 ~NGiNEERING SERVICES
325.20 JRNL-CD
180.00 09-00 EN~--SER¥ICES P/I DEPT
180.00 JRNL-CD
405.0-~----09~'60---ENG-~SERVICES P/Z DEPT
405.00 JRNL-CD
345.00 09-00 -~'~-S~R~CES STREET DEPT
345.00 JRNL-CD
i~-~6-- d~=O0 LNG SERVICES WATER DEPT
i22.~0 09-00 LNG SERVICES SEWER DEPT
245.00 JRNL-CD
45.00 09-00 ENG SERVICES PARKS DEPT
45.00 JRNL-CD
335.40 09-00 MSAP AUDITORS ROAD
335.40 JRNL-CD
10/24/00
112.00 09-00 SURFACE
10 / 24_( 0~0 ........... __1._1_.2. ~0__ JR NL -C D
WATER MANAGEMENT
1U/24/00 10/24/00
90.00 09-00 LOST LAKE REHABILITATION
90.00 JRNL-CD
90.00
lO/24/oo lO/24~o~ ............... ?_o.oo..
09-00 MAPLE MANORS SUB-DIVISIO
JRNLoCD
880.00 09-00 GRADING PERMIT APPLICANT
10/24/00 10/24/00 880.00 JRNL-CD
45.00 09-00 AUDITORS/POST OFFICE DEM
io/24/oo i0!.2~/99 ........... ~A.o.~ JRNL-CD
180.00 09-00 LOST LAKE LNG SERVICES
10/24/00 i0/24/00 180.00 JRNL-¢D
ACCOUNT NUMBER
71-7100-9530
iOlO
71-7100-9510
1010
-01-2300-i095
iOIO
01-2300-1095
lOlO
01-2300-1095
1010
01-2300-1066
1010
01-4190-3100
1010
0i-4190-3100
101.
01:4286_3100
1010
73-7300-3100
78-7800-3100
1010.
01-4340-3100
1010
26-5700-3100
1010
01-4190-3100
1010
30-5615-3100
1010
01-2300-10&6
1010
01-2300-109E
1010
26-5700-3100
1010
30-5640-3100
iOlO
PAGE 11 P U R C H A 5 E J O U R N A L
_~A_P_-.~_02-01 ........ CITY OF HOUND
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE D_AT_E___S_T_A~T_LI_S- ....... _AHOqN_T DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUHBER
34448 4~_~_0~00 CTY RD 15 ERG SERVICES 55-5877-3100
........ 10/24~0~1~-~700 45.00 JRNL-CD 1010
34449 360.00 09-00 TIF DISTRICT ENG SERVICE 55-5880-3100
10/24/00-~0/24/00 360.~b" J~NL-CD 1010
34450 135.00 09-00 ALTA SURVEY TRUE VALUE
lg/2~60 10/24/00 135.00 JRNL-CD .....
55-5881-3100
lO10
34451
10/24/00 10/24/00
180.00 09-00 5212 LYNWOOD SUB-DIVISIO
~]~ ~--~J R N [C.~ D
01-2300-1097
1010
34452 180.00 09-00 HASBOR ENG SERVICES
i0/24/00 I0/24/00 180.00 JRNL-CD
01-2300-1089
~o1~
34453
i0/24/00 i0/24/00
225.00 09-00 LANGDON SUB ENG SERVICES
225.~O--~J~L'CD '
01-2300-1090
lOiO
34454 45.00 09-00 2000 MSA REPORTS/ADMINIS 26-5700-3100
i0/24/00 i0/24/00 45.00 JRNL-CD iOlO
34455 1,927.50 09-00 SENIOR CTR ENG SERVICES 01-2300-1088
10124/00 i0/24/00 1,927.50 J~CD 1010
34456 1,291.40 09-00 POST OFFICE
10~24/00 10124100 1,291.40 JRNL-CD
BOUNDRY/TOPO 55-5879-3100
1010
34457 45.00 09-00 CARLSON SUB ENG SERVICES
10/24/00--16-/~%~00 45.00 J~NL-~D
01-2300-1107
!010
34458 4~o_.oo~__q~,_Qo_ 2251 COMMERCE ENG SERVIC 55-5880-3100
10/24/00 10/24/00 450.00 JRNL-CD iOlO
34459 325.20 09-00 CODDON SUB ENG SERVICES
10/24/00 10/24/00 ~-~--~RNL-cO
01-2300-1108
1010
34460 235.20 09-00 HINRICHS ENG SERVICES
10/2'4i'b-~-1-~24100 ~o---)~NL-cD'
01-2300-1ill
lOlO
34461 235.20 09-00 HANSSEN ENG SERVICES 01-2300-~112
10/24/00 i0/2i~0~ 235'20 JRNL-CD 1010
MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI* VENDOR TOTAL 12564.90
M3iiI 09200015956 30.00 DRUG SCREENING
i0/24/00 10/24/00 30.00 JRNL-CD
MEDTGX LABORATORIES VENDOR TOTAL 30.00
BEUTOW, MICHAEL
01-4140-3110
1010
H3i70 0000711883 ~;~b~06 ~1'00 WASTEWATER
10/24/00 10/24/00 33.308.00 JRNL-CD
ITAN COUNCIL ENVI* VENDOR TOIAL 33308.00 --'
78-7800-4230
1010
PAGE 12
AP-C02-01
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NHBR DATE DATE STATUS
10/24/00 10/24/00
'AET~O UEST INSPECTION
M3250 001028
MINNEGASCO
H3320 PO7MN0271130
PURCHASE JOURNAL C I T Y__O_F~M_D U_N D .....
AHg.U~- DE_SCRIPTION
001231
1,770.00 JRNL-CD
SER* ~ENDOR TOTAL
1770.00
10/24/00 10/24/00
2b.89 08-17-00 THRU 09-18-00 DEPOT
37.28 08-17-00 THRU 09-18-00 PARKS
15.98 08-17-00 THRU 09-18-00 LIOUOR
38~4 DS_~.~Z~_THRU 09-i8-0D. FIRE
44.75 08-17-00 THRU 09-18-00 BUILDIN
24.49 08-17-00 THRU 09-18-00 STREETS
i~.)~_.__~Zi?-O0.THRU 09-18-00 WATER
17.25 08-17-00 THRU 09-18-00 SEWER
219.20 JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL
219.20
10/24/00 10124100
~3g.O~O..__JU.L~,AUG,SEPT 2000 CJDN
630.00 JRNL-CD
10/24/00 10/24/00
20.00 R~_E_TT&.I.LE_R~ ~_U_¥ER CARD FOR 2001_
20.00 JRNL-CD
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY VENDOR TOTAL
M3328 000923
10/24/00 10/24/00
MN FIRE SERV CERTIFICATN ~ VENDOR TOTAL
650.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
CERTIFICATION MAAS, J.
JRNL-CD
N3685 000930
NATIONAL
10/24/00 10124100
INDEPENDENT BILLI VENDOR TOTAL
372.78
572.78
745.56
745.56
UTILIYY"BiL~ING CARDS
UTILITY BILLING CARDS
JRNL-CD
N3800 000928
10124/00
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
1010
01-4340-3720
01-4340-3720
71-7100-3720
22-4170-3720
01-4320-3720
04-4280-3720
73-7300-3720
78-7800-3720
1010
01-4140-3800
lO10
71%7100~4140
1010
22-4170-4130
....... 10~
73'7300'-2120
78-7800-2120
.......... 1010
..... 1,26~.'~i .... ~'~0 N~245-301-939 GENERAL
21.99 09-00 #0466-607-223 SIRENS
554.51 09-00 #1914-601-425 LIOUOR
---- 3,0~6~----~'-~0217-606-329 WATER
522.89 09-00 #2184-407-147 FiRE
225.81 09-00 #0047-005-229 PARKS
116.68 09-00 #0864-508-832 STREETS
116.68 09-00 ~0864-508-832 WATER
116.69 09-00 #0864-508-832 SEWER
1,~6~8~-~00- #0018-802-634 LIFT STATI
4,910.17 09-00 #0009-604-835 TRAFFIC SI
360.25 09-00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
10~4/~0 ....... i~Gi4.78 JRNL-CD
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO VENDOR TOTAL 12614.78
22.42 MISCELLANEOUS
22.42 MISCELLANEOUS
22.42 MISCELLANEOUS
22.42 MISCELLANEOUS
22.42 MISCELLANEOUS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
UFFICE SUPPLIES
03870 107767588000
01-4320-3710
01-4150-3710
71-7100-3710
78-7800-3710
22-4170-3710
01-4340-3710
01-4280-3710
73-7300-3710
78-7800-37!0
78-7800-3710
01-4280-3710
01-4280-3710
1010
01-4040-2100
01-4090-2100
01-4140-2100
01-4190-2100
01-4340-2100
PAGE 13
AP-C02-01
PURCHASE JOURNAL
C I TY~OF_ HOUND
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE NMBR
INVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE D_A~_E__$]~T~US
_SH~U~T .DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
10/24/00.1g.~24/00__
7.47 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE
7.47 MISCeLlANEOUS OFFICE
11.21 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE
11.21 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE
149.~6__J.R. NL-CD
SUPPLIES 01-4280-2100
SUPPLIES 71-7100-2100
SUPPLIES 73-7300-2100
SUPPLIES 78-7800-2100
1010
107793075000
'~KFICE DEPOT
i0/24/00 I0/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
49.54 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4280-2100
49.54 ~S~ELLANEOU~..OFFICE SUPPLIES 73-7300-2100___
49.54 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 78-7800-2100
148.62 JRNL-CD lOiO
298.08
P3948 001001
21.75 _P~B~J_C.A~ION "TIRED COPS"
21.75 JRNL-CD
01-4140-4170
1010
PERF
VENDOR TOTAL
21.75
P3994 137946
10/24/00 10/24/00
1,630.75 WINE
1,630.75 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9520
............. 1.0_10
USTIS & SONS WINE COMPAN VENDOR TOTAL
1630.75
'P4000 53206297
10/24100 10/24/00
99.84 MIX
99.84 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9540
1010
-PEPS i"COLA COMPANY
VENDOR TOTAL
99.84
P4021 652359
10/24/00 10/24/00
278.30 LI (~UOR
278.30 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9510
1010
652360
10124 70b---~i~ 4/00
2,334.80 WINE
2,334.80 JRNL-CD
246.00 LIQUOR
71-7100-9520
lOiO
654588
10/24100 10/24/00
246.00 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9510_
1010
654589
10/24/00 10/24/00
394.10 WINE
394.i0 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9520_
1010
654590
90.00 MISCELLANEOUS NON-TAXABLE
10/24/00 10/24/00 90.00 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9550
1010
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS, * VENDOR TOTAL 3343.20
P4038 3593I
665.31 CIGARETTES
i0/24/00 i0/24/00 665.3! JRNL-CD
71-7100-9550
i010
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
VENDOR TOTAL 665.31
~i71 884312-00
10/24/00 10/24/00
100.06 MISCELLANEOUS NON-TAXABLE
100.06 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9550
1010
884321-00
10124/00 10124100
1,371.78 LI (~UOR
1,371.78 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9510
1010
PAGE 14 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N
AP-C02-OI ...... CITY OF MOUND
A L
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DAT~__~ATUS AMOUNT DESC. RIPTION
884514-00 2,783.i3 LIQUOR
10 / 2_~ / ? o..10__/_2~ / 00 2,7 ~ ~, ~__~.~r C D_.
884784-00
1,289.11 WINE
10/24/00 10/24/00 1,289.11 JRNL-CD
886882-00 5,008.60 LIQUOR
10/24/00 10/24/00 5,008.60 JRNL-CD
887116-00 411.16 WINE
10/24/00 10/24/00 411.16 JRNL-CD
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL 10963.84
R424i 000912
...... 100.00 CONSUL-~'-GU'STAFSON,
10/24/00 10/24/00 100.00 JRNL-CD
BRUCE'
R'IDGEVIEW BUSINESS HEALTH V~'~OR TOTAL 100.00
R4290 77661
10/24/00 10/24/00
178.94 ICE
178.94 JRNL-CD
78047
lO/24/o'0"Yo~24/oo
108.72 ICE
i08.72 JRN~2~D ~'
RON'S ICE COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 287.66
R4300 001001
10/24/00 10/24/00
163.00 OCT NOV
i63.00 JRNL-CD
DEC 2000 DUES
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUND
VENDOR TOTAL 163.00
S4349 22898
158.55
10/24/00 10/24/00 i58.55
REPLACE -C'[ -~J T c'H -
JRNL-CD
SCHARBER & SONS
VENDOR TOTAL 158.55
S4351 001009
lO/24/~o
ZS__._O_O~__R_~!M.BUR.SEMENT BOOT ALLOWANCE
75.00 JRNL-CD
SCOTT KIVISTO
VENDOR TOTAL 75.00
S4353 C31059
18.48 PRE-INK HAND STAMP
10/24/00 10/24/00 18.48 JRNL-¢D
SCHWAAB, INC.
VENDOR TOTAL 18.48
S4381 000921
80.00 09-21-00 EDC MEETING
10124/00 10/24/00 80.00 JRNL-CD
SHIRLEY HAWKS
- VEND~R-TOTAL --80.00
54390 001130
lO/24/o~'i~7~oo
2,576.64 11-00 LIQUOR RENTAL SPACE
2,576.64 J~N~ccD--
SHORELINE PLAZA
VENDOR TOTAL 2576.64
ACCOUNT NUMBER
71-7100-9510
1010
71-7100-9520
1010
71-7100-9510
1010
71-7100-9520
1010
22-4170'-31~o ........
1010
71-719~?~550 ..............
1010
71-7100-9550
10:
01-4140-4120
1010
01-4340-3~20
1010
78-7800-2240
1010
71-7100-2200
1010.
01-4020-3100
lOiO
71-7100-3920
1010
PAGE i5
AP-C02-Oi
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
PURCHASE
____ ~ T__Y_~. _~ U N D
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
JOURNAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
S4448 001130
lo/24)o6~o/24/oo
325.00 l_i__-O_O_ D~G KENNEL FEES
325.00 JRNL-CD
SPORTING BREED KENNELS VENDOR TOTAL
325.00
54462 001005
10/24/00 10/24/00
175.00 SEMINAR NOV 16-17, 2000
175.00 J3.~L.:(.D .......
ST. PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT VENDOR TOTAL
i75.00
S~,580 6723
10124/00 10/24/00
7-~2-.--4~-~[~L~C~ LIGHT POLE
722.43 JRNL-CD
STERNE ELECTRIC CO VENDOR TOTAL
722.43
S4600 180238.1
10/24/00 10/24/00
15_~.7_O~___SHELLS.~ND GUN CLEANING E~UIP
155.70 JRNL-CD
STREICHER'S VENDOR TOTAL
155.70
10 137267
10124100 10124100
30.61 B TR TUBES (2)
30.61 JRNL-CD
5UBURBAN TIRE COMPANY
VENDOR TOTAL 30.61
S4612 001013
200.00
I0/24/00 10/24/00 200.00
2ND HALF, 2000 MEMBERSHIP
JRNL-CD
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY VEND~R TOTAL
200.00
T4730 245
lO/24/oo i-o7)-~,?'-o o
28.08
28.08 JRNL-CD
SNOW REMOVAL BIDS
246
10/24/00 i0/24/00
31.83 VEHICLE ORDINANCE
31.83 JRNL-cD
262
1 o / 2 4/-o o -~ b-/)-~-~ o o
28.09 SNOW REMOVAL BIDS
2~---jR'~L:CD-
THE LAKER
T4770 177520
VENDOR TOTAL 88.00
56.00 BEER KEGS
10/24/00 10/24/00 56.00 JRNL-CD
207800
62.50
10/24/00 10/24/00 62.50
MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE
JRNL-CD
207801
2,955.80 BEER
10/24/00 10/24/~0 2,955.80 JRNL-CD
208422
208423
12.10
i0/24/00 i0/24/00 12.iO
4.841.75
MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE
JRNL-CD
BEER
01-4140-4270
lO10
01-4140-4110
1010
01-4280-3710
lOlO
01-4140-2270
101'0
22-4170-3190
1010
1010
01-4280-3510
1010
01-4020-3510
1010
01-4280-3510
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
71-7100-9550
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
71-7100-9550
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
PAGE 16
AP-CO2-O1
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE
INVOICE DUE HOLD
NMBR DATE .
PURCHASE
C_I_I_Y_ _C)_ F. MOHND
_~O~.~.. DESCRIPTION
JOURNAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
THORPE
DISTRIBUTING
COMPAN VENDOR TOTAL 7928.15
T480B 13032
357.00 09-26-00 HRA/COUNCIL MEETING
10/24/00 10/~./~ ........ 3~0__. JR~C-CD
01-4020-4200
1010
113054 127.25 10-09-00 PLANNING MEETING 01-4190-4200
10/24/00 10/24/00 127.25___J~_~L~TCD ....... 1010
TIME SAVER OFF SITE SECRE* VENDOR TOTAL 484.25
T4940 19299
10/24/00 10/24/00
370.5["-~ ~L~G
370.5Z JRNL-CD
78-7800-2300
1010
.... I-~'~£-$'TATE PUMP & CONTROL--~-~-~DOR TOTAL 370.51
T4951 069550
4.29 BULK NUTS
10/24/00 10/24/00 4.29 JRNL-/D
01-4340-2200
1010
069490
10/24/00 10124/00
40.10 BATTERY
40.i0 JRNL-CD
_ . . 78-7800~220g ........
1010
TRUE VALUE
VENDOR TOTAL 44.39
T4970 108092
10/24/00 10/24/00
340.00 KEYLESS ENTRY
340.00 JRNL-CD
01-4320-3830
.. 1010
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO VENDOR TOTAL 340.00
T4985
274277-0
10/24/00 10/24/00
................... ~:~ Mi~C~'LLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
15.64 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
I5.64 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
15.64 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
15.64 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
5m~_I___~CELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
5.21 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
7.82 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
7.8~_ M_~EL.LANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
29.29 INKJET PRINTER CARTRIDGE
133.55 JRNL-CD
01-4040-2100
01-4090-2100
01-4140-2100
01-4190-2i00
01-4340-2100
01-4280-2100
71-7100-2i00
73-7300-2100
78-7800-2100
01-4190-2100
iOlO
TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY CO VENDOR TOTAL 133.55
uso5o 3~274 1,425.55
'- lO/24/oo i o )~%-/-~% 1,425.55
INJT_IAL ISSUE, BUETO,J, MIKE
JRNL-CD
01-4140-1100
1010
40866
32.9i
10/24/00 10/24'~-00 ............... 32.91
INITIAL ISSUE, BUETOW, MIKE
JRNL-CD
01-4140-1100
1010
38276
10/24/00'10/24/00
~3~4~?.5~ ]~TIAL ISSUE, BUETOu, MiKE
634.95 JRNL-CD
01-4140-1100
1010
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
VENDOR TOTAL 2093.41
05102 OOii30 31.95
31.95
Ii-O0 BALBOA PARKING
11-00 BALBOA PARKING
01-4280-4200
73-7300-4200
PAGE i7
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR INVOICE
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE
P U R C M A S E J OU R N A L
.... E. ~_T Y _ 0 F~ MOUND
DUE HOLD
DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
10/24/00 10/24100
31.95 Ii-O0 BALBOA PARKING
95.85 JRNL-CD
UNITED PROPERTIES VENDOR TOTAL
95.85
W5297 1094196
10/24/00 10/24/00
74.95-' ~'i-SC~L'[ANEOUS WARNING LIGHTS
74.95 JRNL-CD
WARNING LITES OF MINNESOTA VENDOR TOTAL
74.95
W5630 3672
10/2A)00 ~67 F~-/o o
580.25 09-15-00
580.25 JRNL-CD
WATERMAIN BREAK
3674
10/24/00 10/24/00
490.00 09-__l_!rpO ~E~AIRED STOR~ SEWER
490.00 JRNL-CD
3692
i0/24/00 i0/24/00
1,060.00 09-19-00 EXTEND STORM SE~ER
1,060.00 JRNL-CD
WIDMER INC
VENDOR TOTAL
2130.25
5583 00027403
10/24/00 i0/24/00
1,033.00 TUITION BERENT,FORSMAN,MYERS
1,033.00 JRNL-CD
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE VENDOR TOTAL
i033.00
Z6593 000912
10/24/00 10/24/00
96.00
96.00
09T1D-iO~-~L-E~ yI ON 0 FF I C I AL '
JRNL-CD
XNN SCHINGLER VENDOR TOTAL 96.00
Z6728 80735
10/24/00 10/24/00
876.77 BROCHURES
876.77 JRNL-CD
ALERT-ALL CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL 876.77
Z6729 7499
10/24/00 10124/00
225.00 MICROSOFT WORD CLASS RAHN J.
225.00 JRNL-CD
NEw HORIZONS LEARNING CENT VENDOR TOTAL
225.O0
Z6730 001010
10/24/00 10/24/00
10'6,Oo' REFUND VARIANCE
100.00 JRNL-CD
'FIGENSKAU, ERICK
VENDOR TOTAL
100.00
Z673i 000912
10/24/00 10/24/00
122.50
122.50
09-12-00
JRNL-CD
ELECTIO~ OFFICIAL
JENSEN, ELIZABETH M. VENDOR TOTAL 122.50
Z6732 000912
10/24/00 10/24/00
.HEPHERD, HARRIET C. VENDOR TOTAL
96.00 09-12-00
96.00 JRNL-CD
96.00
ELECTION OFFICIAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
7~-7800-4200
1010
01-4280-3710
1010
73-7300-3800
1010
01-4280-4200
1010
01-42~0-4200
1010
22-4170-4100
1010
01-4060'1300 '
1010
22-4170-2280..
1010
01-4040-4110
1010
01-3510-0000
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
PAGE 18
AP-C02-01
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE NMBR
Z6733 000912
~ILSON, CLIFFORD
iNVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE DATE STATUS
i0/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
~I~O.~. MD HND
AMOUNT DE_SC _RI pT I ON_
36.00 09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
36.00 JRNL-CD
36.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER
01-40o0-i300
1010 .
Z6734 000912
i0/24/00 10124/00
VENDOR TOTAL
69.00 09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
69.00 JRNL-CD
69.00
01-4060-1300
lOlO
Z6735 000912
STARR, NANCY
Z6736 000912
HANSON, ROBERT B.
10/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
10124/00 10124/00
___~.9~_~09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
36.00 JRNL-CD
36.00
36.00 09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
36.~__JRNL-CD ....
VENDOR TOTAL 36.00
0~-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
i010
-Z~?~'7--'000912
CHARON, KAROL
119.00
10/24/00 10/24/00 119.00
VENDOR IOTAL ii9.00
09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
01_406~fi30-s ....
1010
Z6735 000912
ANDERSON, REBECCA
Z6739 000912
~ERNER, CHAROLETTE
42.00
10/24/00 10/24/00 42.00
VENDOR TOTAL 42.00
36.00
10/24/00 10/24/00 36.00
A. VENDOR TOTAL 36.00
09-12-00 E~EC~tON O~FICIAL _ 01-4060-1300 __
JRNL-CD IOlO
09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300
JRN__L-__C_D__ ....................... 1010
Z6740 000912
PAYNE, PAULINE
99.00
10/24/00 10/24/00 99.00
' -VE~OOR TOTAL 99.00
0~=~2=00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
01-4060-1300
1010
Z6741 000912
10124/00
99.00 09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
10/24/00 99.00 JRNL-CD
01-4060-1300
1010
;~ICHTER,
EDWARD B.
VENDOR TOTAL 99.00
Z6742 000912
99.00
10/24/00 I0/24/00 99.00
O'BRIEN, DOROTHY M.
VENDOR TOTAL 99.00
09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
01-4060-1300
1010
Z6743 000915
SCHULTZ, DEB
10/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
115.50 09-12'%00'-ELECTION OFFICIAL
llS.SO JRNL-£D
115.50
01-4060-1300
1010
Z6744 000912
96.00 09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
01-4060-1300
PAGE Z9
AP-C02-01
VENDOR
NO. IHVOICE NMBR
=r~A-~M-U S SE N, TOM
16745 000912
RICE, KATHY
Z6746 000912
RICHTER, ELLA E.
16~-'-000912
COLEMAN, CHRIS
1674B 000912
[LLER, SARA W.
16749 000912
KOENIG, EDYTHE
16750 000912
-"PE-~Ai~7 MARGIE J.
1675i 000912
ERICKSON, ELTA M.
16752 000912
MUELLER, MICHAEL
16753 000912
GILMORE, JOLENE E.
16754 000912
ANDERSON, MARION
16755 000912
P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L
CIT~_OF. MOUND
INVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE _D~TE._S~]~.S __AM.O~N~.. DESCRIPTION
i0/24/00 i0/24/00 96.00
VENDOR TOTAL 96.00
JRNL-CD
lO/24/oo i0/24/oo
96.00 09-12-00
96.00 JRNL-CD
ELECTION OFFICIAL
VENDOR TOTAL
99.00 09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
99.00 JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL
99.00
10124/00 10/24/00
il9.00 09-12-~'~-~L~T~O~ O-FFI~AL' ' '
119.00 JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL
119.00
10/24/00 10/24/00
99.00 09-12-.O_O___E L_EQT i_ON_ O.FF IC IAL
99.00 JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL
10/24/00 10/24100
VENDOR TOTAL
99.__00
93.00 09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
93.00 JRNL-CD
10124/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
93.00
90.00
90.00
90.00
09~-12-Z0'0 ELECTI ON OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
10/24/00 10/24/00
96.00 09-12-00
96.00 JRNL-CD
ELECTION OFFICIAL
VENDOR TOTAL
96.00
10/24/00 10/24/00
108.50 09-12-00
i08.50 JRNL-CD
ELECTION OFFICIAL
VENDOR TOTAL i08.50
36.00
i0/24/00 i0/24/00 36.00
092~.~L60- ELECT I ON OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
VENDOR TO'T~L ......... 3~L00-
10/24/00 10124100
93.00
93.00
09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL 93.00
93.00 09-12-00 ELECT]ON OFFICIAL
93.00 JRNL--CD
ACCOUNT NUMBER
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
IOlO
0i-4060-1300
lOlO
01r4060-130.0
1010
01-4060-1300
. 1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
PAGE 20
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE
NMBR
INVOICE
DATE
PURCHASE
CITY OF MOUND
DUE HOLD
DAT ~ .._~ ~__ __A~ Q ~.~? DE SCR I P T I O N
J 0 U R
N AL
ADAMS, EUGENE R.
Z6756 000912
HASSE, CKLAIR
16757 000912
~UNDbERG, MARY LOU
16758 000912
GUTTORMSON, PATTY
16759 000912
ORN, PHYLLIS
'%676'0 000912
NIESEN, JAMES M.
Z676i 000912
RIES, MARJORIE T.
16762 000912
JESSEN, PHYLLIS
--16763 17355
DESIGNER LINOUSINE
VENDOR TOTAL 93.00
93.00 09-12-00 ELECTION
10/24/00 10/24/00 93.00 JRNL-CD
VENDOR TOTAL
10/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
93.00
93.00 09-12-00 ELECTION
93.00 JRNL-CD
93.00
10/24/0~- 10/24/00 119.00
VENDOR TOTAL 119.00
OFFICIAL
OFFICIAL
ilg_.O0____09.~-&2~-O~p_ELECTI ON OFFICIAL
i03.50
10/24/00 i0/24/00 103.50
VENDOR TOTAL 103.50
97.50
10/24/00 10/24/00 97.50
97.~0
100.50
VENDOR TOTAL
100.50
10/24/00 10124100
VENDOR TOTAL i00.50
90.00
90.00
10/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL 90.00
130.00
10/24/00 10/24/00 i30.00
VENDOR TOTAL i30.00
JRNL-CD
09-I2-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
09-~.'~%00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
jR'NL-CD
09-12-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL
JRNL-CD
----~R~S'P'ORTATION TO AIRPORT
JRNL-CD
16764 002000SF5-4
MESABI RANGE
10124100 10124100
140.00 FIRE SCHOOL, MAAS J./MYERS T.
140.00 JRNLgCD .....
COMMUNITY AND VENDOR TOTAL i40.00
10/24/00 10/24/00
VENDOR TOTAL
i0/24/00 i0/24/00
727.50 BOARDS/COMM
727.50 JRNL-CD
16765 001003
MINNETONKA MIST
Z6766 001017
727.50
APPRECIATION DINNE
50.00 UPGraDE UEBSITE
50.00 JRNL-CD
ACCOUNT NUMBER
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
101o
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
.... 10.10 .....
01-4060-1300
lOlv
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4060-1300
1010
01-4040-4110
1010
22-4170-4110
1010
01-4020-4100
1010
01-4040-3100
1010
PAGE 21
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
LEIF, TED
Z6767 001018
~HALT, CRAIG
VENDOR ]OTAL
10/24/00 i0/24/00
V~ N~O~-'~ T A L
Z6768 001019
~.o224/o~-io/2A/oo
T~qMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP* VENDOR TOTAL
Z6769 001019
10/24/00 10/24/00
MUONIO, ROGER VENDOR TOTAL
Z6770 00062i
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY O_F__M. OqND
AMOUNT DE.$CRIPTION
50.00
100.00 REF~'"~iA~c~-
100.00 JRNL-CD
100.00
286.00 PUBLICAT1QN . _
286.00 JRNL-CD
286.00
202.20 REIMBURSE MINOR SUBDIVISION
202.20 JRN4~CD
202.20
21.85
637.30
i0/24/00 I0/24/00 659.15
OVER~XYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
REFUND ESCROW AND CLOSE
JR NL -C O
THERESA
VENDOR TOTAL
TOTAL ALL'-V~N~O~
659.15
183,576.04
ACCOUNT NUMBER
01-3510-0000
1010
01-4040-4170
1010
01-2300-I083
.... lO1O__.
30-3830-0000
01-2300-1091
...... 1010 ....
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
OcLober 20, 2000
TO:
Kandis Hanson
City Manager
FROM:
Greg Skinner
F'ub, lJc Works Supt.
SUBSECT: CB[) Snow Plowing Conf~ract
Bids for the 2000-2001 CBD snow plowing were opened on
October 20, 2000. lhere was only one bid submitted, Widmer
Bros. in St. Bof~.ifacJus. After reviewing the bid prices,
which are ¢:ompa~al)le to Jast year prices, I recommend that
Widmer Bros. L~e a~a~'ded the c:of/tract.
printed on recycled paper
Page No.
of
Pages
WIDMER INC.
P.O. Box 219
ST. BONIFACIUS, MINNESOTA 55375
(612) 446-1495
FAX (612) 446-1836
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE I DATE
CITY OF MOUND 472-1251 I 10/16/00
STREET JOB NAME
5341 MAYWOOD 00-01 SNOWPI,OWTNG
CITY, STATE and ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION
MOUND, MN 55364
ARCHITECT
DATE OF PLANS I JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: PER HOUR
......... 980 CAT $130..... O0 ..........................................................................................................
................ 3.9.Q...gQ~.U.....(~.....TD,) ....................................................... $ 86.00
...................... 4...X_4........P....Z.C._.K...U...P.S.., ................................................................................................................................................................ $......5.5...OO ..........................................................................................................
................. %A~E.M.....P~.P~........(..~.QR....HA~LING.) ...................................... $ 5k. O0 . . .
.............. ~A~.T../5.ANP....D.EL!~.ERED.,._.(SHBffECZ..~O Cit~NGE) .......... $ 30.00. P-ER......T.OE .........................................................
We will not be responsible for any underground utilities that cannot be located by the utility companies or the homeowner. Normal clean-up
is included in this proposal. There is no sod figured in the proposal. We will not assume the responsibility for water pipes, trees, tree roots,
sprinkler systems, etc. unless notified to exact location prior to excavating. Frost ripping extra charge. It is expressly stipulated and agreed
that the undersigned shall not be held liable for damages to grass, trees, shrubs and any underground obstructions, including pipes, elec-
trical wiring and etc. In bidding job we figure soil to be dry. If wet, there will be extra charges based on time and material. See reverse side
for lien notice and additional terms.
hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
dollars ($ ).
Payment to be made as follows:
NET 30 DAY,q
A finance charge of 11/~% per month (18% annual rate) will be charged on past due accounts.
All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike ~ ~=~..~...~ ,
manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications Authorized
involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra Signature
charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents
or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance, Note: This proposal may be
Our workers are fully covered by Workman's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted within
ccrptanc o[ rop[ sal - The above prices, specifications
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance:
Signature
Signature
Oaober 24, 2000
RESOLUTION NO. 00-
RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN
~ LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM
UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT
CALENDAR YEAR 2001
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act ( Minnesota Statutes Section
473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended
to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by
Minnesota Statutes Section 473.121; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base
Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account, the Local Housing
Incentive Account and the Inclusionary Housing Account is intended to provide certain
funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and
WI~REAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans
under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites
cleanup funding from he Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless
the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the
Minnesota Statutes Section 473.254; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan
Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and live-cycle housing
goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the
Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and
WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions
the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing foals through preparation of the
Housing Action Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing,
negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and
WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Locad
Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and
WHEREAS, for calendar year 2001, a metropolitan area municipality that
participated in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 2000,
can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes Section 473.254 if: (a) the municipality
elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program by November 15, 2000; and Co)
the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and
life-cycle housing goals for the municipality.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEI) that the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota, elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 2001.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
by Councilmember
and seconded
SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION
QUASI PuBETc FUNCTION - PORTABLE SIGN
City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0600 FAX: 472-0620
Portable signs used for the purpose of directing the public used in conjunction with a
governmental unit or quasi-public functions. The period of use shall not exceed ten
(10) consecutive days and requires approval of the City Council. Signs shall be placed
on the premises of the advertised event, and/or on such other premises as approved
by the City Council when granting the permit. A permit is required, however is
exempt from all fees.
(If mom ~an one, plea~ list on ~pa~tc sheet of paper)
PHONE
NUMBER OF SIGNS:
TYPE OF SIGN: banner wall mount
--~temporary permanent
SIZE OF SIGN: 3 feet high x ~ feet wide --
free standing
/,~ square feet
DESCRIBE REASON/PURPOSE FOR REQUEST:
(message,
DESCRIBE SIGN materials~
Applicant's/Signature
Date
//111//////////////I/////////////I/////////I/I////I//I////////////////////////
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON:
RESOLUTION # 00-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION TO CREATE ONE
ADDITIONAL LOT FROM THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5212 LYNWOOD BLVD.,
LOTS 6, 7, 8, BLOCK 1, REARRANGEMENT OF BLOCK 10, ABRAHAM LINCOLN
ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK
P & Z CASE # 00-52
WHEREAS, the applicant, has submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create a lot
from the existing parcel at 5212 Lynwood Blvd; and,
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 Zoning District that requires a
6,000 square feet lot area, 20 feet front yard setbacks, and 10 feet side yard setbacks for non lots
of record; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed parcel B has approximately 10,890 square feet of lot area and
60 feet of lot width which exceed the required minimums for the district; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed building setbacks as shown for parcel B are conforming to
district requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision would reclassify the proposed parcels A and B to
non-lots of record, subjecting them to all applicable zoning provisions; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended
approval of the minor subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota as follows:
The City does hereby grant a minor subdivision of the property pursuant to Section
330:20, Subdivision 1.B with the following conditions:
a. Provide preliminary site and grading plan, showing how topographical issues will
be addressed.
b. Final grading and drainage plan be approved by the City Engineer at the time of
building permit application.
c. Provide drainage and utility easements along the new lot line separating the two
parcels, five feet wide on each side.
d. The new sanitary sewer and water services shall either be installed or some type
of financial guarantee provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
e. One street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
f. A park dedication fee of $500.00 shall be paid.
2. This Minor Subdivision is granted for the following new legally described property:
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution and
easements with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording.
D AFT
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2000
Those present: Chair GeoffMichael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, Bill
Voss, and Frank Weiland. Absent and excused: Commissioners Orvin Burma, Jerry
Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Council Liaison Bob Brown; Staff present: Building
Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Diana Mestad.
1.0
CASE//00-52: MINOR SUBDIVISION, 5212 LYNV~OOD BLVD., STEVE
CODDON, 5240 LYNWOOD BLVD., LOTS 6, 7, 8, BLOCK 1,
REARRANGEMENT OF BLOCK 10, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION
TO LAKESIDE PARK.
The City Building Official stated that he had discussed this case with the City Engineer
and the City Planner and that the largest issue is the grading implication. He also stated
that the minor subdivision does not meet the requirements for design. He stated that the
City Engineer feels that the lots require too much retaining and the City Planner feels it
does not fit with the neighborhood. The City Planner feels the whole parcel should be
platted at one time.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council deny the minor
subdivision as requested. If it is the prerogative of the Planning Commission to approve
the request, the recommendations contained in the City Engineer's September 29, 2000
memorandum should be included as conditions of approval.
Recommendations from the City Engineer:
1. Provide preliminary site and grading plan, showing topographical issues will be
dealt with.
2. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan to be approved by the City
Engineer at time of building permit application.
3. Provide drainage and utility easements along the new lot line separate the two
parcels, five feet wide on each side.
4. The new sanitary sewer and water services either are installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
5. One deferred street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
Written Comments from Commissioner Mueller:
The lot size, although meeting requirements, is not consistent with the neighborhood as
far as the building pad is concerned and also creates nonconforming property for the
existing dwelling due to inadequate frontage at the building setback line. This applicant
knew at the time of the submission of the previous minor subdivision which created this
lot that he expected to further subdivide this parcel since he originally changed his
D AFT
request from a major (3 lot) subdivision to a minor subdivision and now is requesting a
second minor subdivision. Although our current ordinance seems to allow this, the intent
of the ordinance for minor subdivisions was not to avoid proper planning that a major
subdivision requires (i.e., setbacks, lot widths, street frontages, etc.). My
recommendation would be for denial of this application due to these factors:
1. Inadequate information with regard to the engineering and siting of the proposed
building pad with respect to drainage.
2. Creating nonconformity for the remainder lot.
3. Piecemeal subdivision not allowing for proper planning.
Voss pointed out that Mueller expresses a concern about nonconformity that is not
mentioned in the report from the City Planner. The City Building Official stated that the
City Planner's memo on page 8 of the packet does contain comments regarding the
platting.
Voss questioned whether the fact that this was done in a piecemeal fashion was enough
of a reason for denial. The City Building Official stated it may not be enough of a reason
on its own, but it is an additional reason.
Voss stated that if the lot was nonconforming, this was something the Planning
Commission never allows. Glister stated that the City Planner did not make mention of
whether the lot was nonconforming and that this was information the Planning
Commission needed to make a decision.
Voss stated it would be a subjective decision to deny this request if it does meet the
subdivision code. The City Building Official pointed out that the City Planner had stated
that his recommendation was based on the neighborhood fit and that this does not fit and
the platting is not comprehensive.
Glister wondered where Mueller had gotten the idea that this was nonconforming and
asked for clarification on this point. The City Building Official stated that Mueller had
not given clarification on what the nonconformity was.
Voss stated that this could be denied on the basis of the City Engineer's report, as there
was no grading or house location. He felt the Planning Commission should not move this
forward until the City Engineer's questions are answering in addition to obtaining
clarification from Mueller on the nonconformity issue.
Weiland asked the City Building Official if he had anything that would show that
creating these lots would make one of the parcels nonconforming. The City Building
Official stated that to his knowledge, there was nothing to show this.
Voss stated that he respected Mueller's knowledge of the zoning code and felt that his
clarification was necessary before deciding this issue.
D AFT
Steve Coddon, the applicant in this case, address the Commission and stated that the two
parcels created were con£orming and zoned R_2 property. He stated that these parcels
would have 60 feet of road fi'outage and be 10,000 square feet. It was his opinion that
these did fit with the neighborhood and that there was adequate lot size for a home. Mr.
Coddon showed the Commission examples of homes he thought would fit on the lot. He
further stated that only veT minimal if any grading would be necessa~. Mr. Coddon
stated that both parcels would be in excess of Mound's conforming requirements. He
stated that there would be a driveway easement, but there has never been a question of
nonconformity.
Michael stated that he could foresee a future problem with adding decks to the proposed
houses. Mr. Coddon stated that the lots were large enough for decks and he had planned
for this in advance.
Michael stated that he did feel that this proposal meets the ordinance requirements and
that desig-n ideas are not the issue before the Commission.
Voss pointed out that if this meets the ordinance, the Planning Commission must approve
it. Glister a~eed with this and stated that the drainage, etc., issues would be worked out
when the building permit was issued and were not for the Planning Commission to
decide.
Michael pointed out to the applicant that a future variance for a larger deck would not be
possible.
The City Building Official pointed out that Staff's recommendation stated that if the
Commission were to approve this, the City Engineer's issues should be a condition of the
approval. He further stated that the driveway slope does meet the City requirements.
Weiland asked about the last paragraph on the City Engineer's memo on page 9 of the
packet, as to whether this was referring to a 10-foot retaining wall. The City Building
Official stated it was a 10 percent drop in the driveway. The applicant stated that no new
retain/rig walls would be added.
Hasse pointed out that the blueprint does not show the driveway. The applicant stated
that he addressed the issues in the subdivision code and planned to work on the remaining
when the building permit was applied for.
MOTION, by Voss, seconded by Michael, to approve the applicant's request
for a minor subdivision conditional on the points included in the City
Engineer's report and also that any plans for home construction should
include the garage and the deck on the building permit.
Discussion:
D2AFT
Glister stated that she did not think the provision involving the deck should be part of the
Motion. Voss stated that he would like that provision to stay as part of the Motion.
Weiland stated that he felt it was okay to leave the deck provision in the Motion, as it
would show forethought. Glister agreed to this.
The City Building Official added that the applicant was willing to include the deck in the
building plans.
Chair Michael called the vote.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Motion carried. 5-0.
ME M 0 R/1 ND UM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 20, 2000
JON SUTHERLAND
John Cameron
Minor Subdivision - Coddon property
5212 Lynwood Boulevard
Case No. 00-52
MFRA file #13039
FRA
I have reviewed the revised survey for the Coddon Minor Subdivision that shows the footprint of a tuck-under
house with the driveway connecting to the private drive off Lynwood Blvd. It appears the proposed grading
should work, with some minor adjustments on the north side between the proposed house and the existing
home. The revised survey indicates that the existing retaining wall along Lynwood Blvd. will remain in-place.
The revised survey will satisfy condition numberl of the recommendations contained in my memo of
September 29th; however, any approval should still be conditioned upon recommendations 2 through 5.
L~eside Eleva~on .
Shown with optional cedar siding, mason,
deck and walkout lower level.
BEDROOM 2
11-3 x g-o w~uc~
BEDROOM 1
11-3 x 13-3 ~
B-O x 8-0
ll-fi x 9-7
LIVING
11-7 x 15-4
First Floor
LOFT
23-11 x 15-8
Second Floor
2 Bedrooms
1 Bath
Length 24'-tr'
Depth ............. 36'-0"
First Floor ..... 864 sq. ft. ·
Second Hoor .. 420 sq. ft.
Total Area ..... 1284 stl~.
SOMERSET
Open Living Area,
Plan Designed For
Sloping Lot
[1,835 total square feet of living area]
Special features
· Family room opens onto balcony
through double doors
· Living room offers expansive
living space with windows and
cathedral ceiling
~chen features angled breakfast
bar and comer sink
Master bedroom boasts vaulted
ceiling, walk-in closet, and deluxe
bath
3 bedrooms, 2 1/2 baths, 2-car
garage
Basement foundation
1,022 square feet on the first floor
and 813 square feet on the
second floor
Price Code D
Second Floor
I~r2 -[~SL-~''l~
ope,h to 13-6~12-6
belbw
: vaulted
vaulted cig
< 36'-0"
A :-!:::i-----: 'W
~ _ II-Oxli-O
Family
......................... 13-6x17'-6
Livin9
13-0x14-4
Porch
First Floor
Plan #X20-0328
To order blueprints use the form on page 322 or call toll-free 1-800-DREAM HOME (373-2646)
: ::II~ll[t~ll:~ Ii
l,:I,:i:;...~.,, Ii ,:Ill:,
' ;:- I l' {:i ' ']'~j'
iii,| LIL,,,ttl ,l,I i
:ll!iItihl
'[Ihll
4ill,;,
.]Jilll]
Jill.al
[hIlll
~ilt ,
il,* i
iiii J
EXIS;TING }lOUSE
03°4 7'26"11 l/Ir
263.75 ~
'~ o ' E
_~ - NI-~03 32'48 200.14
PLANNING REPORT
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP
DATE: October 9, 2000
SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision
APPLICANT: Steve Coddon
CASE NUMBER: 00-52
ItKG FILE NUMBER: 00-5
LOCATION: 5212 Lynwood Blvd.
ZONING: Residential District R-2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant, Steve Coddon, has submitted a request for a minor subdivision
to create an additional lot from the property at 5212 Lynwood. The new parcel would be created
from the eastern half of the existing property with Lynwood and lakeshore frontage. This minor
subdivision request is a modification of previous requests #00-20 and 00-31.
The last submittal showed a proposed building location behind the Den Beste home. This
proposal modifies the lot line to front a home on Lynwood while still maintaining lake frontage.
Many of the previous comments regarding utilities, fire and emergency access, and frontage on a
public street are no loner issues.
The single largest issue with the development of this site is the grading implications on the
adjacent properties and the Lynwood right-of-way. In order to build a 'typical' home within the
40 feet by 40 feet buildable area, a significant amount grading and use of retaining walls will be
needed. The elevation difference between the east property line and the street is about 10 feet. A
small buildable footprint also begs the questions of parking, decks, and useable yard space. The
home would need an attached garage which would almost require a tuck-under design. Yard
space is virtually non-existent. Although the property is proposed with lake shore frontage, there
is virtually no relationship between the house and the lake. As discussed in the City Engineer's
report, a grading plan would indicate how access is achieved to the lake from the house.
This minor subdivision does meet minimum requirements for design and with the conditions
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
p. 2
#00-52 Minor Subdivision - 5212 Lynwood Blvd.
October 9, 2000
outlined in the City Engineer's report could work. Subdivision approval should, however, be
based on more than just minimum standards in the zoning and subdivision ordinances. A more
basic question like, "does the lot fit with the neighborhood character?", should be answered prior
to the subdivision process. Another way to view this is, would this lot be platted like this if the
rest of the area were developing at the same time? I would suggest not. This request is very
haphazard and is a good example of bad design. It is difficult for me to make a recommendation
of approval to the Planning Commission on this application.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council
deny the minor subdivision as requested. If it is the prerogative of Planning Commission to
approve the request, the recommendations contained in the City Engineer's September 29, 2000
memorandum should be included as conditions of approval.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
Engineering o Planning o Surveying
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 29, 2000
TO:
Jon Sutherland, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
John Cameron, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Minor Subdivision- Coddon Property
5212 Lynwood Boulevard
Case No. 00-52
MFRA #13039
Comments
The property in this request was created by a minor subdivision (Case No. 00-31), which was
just approved by the City this past summer. The applicant is now requesting approval to redivide
the parcel, which contains the original home.
The survey submitted with the application does not show a proposed house location or any
proposed grading. The buildable area of the vacant parcel being created by the subdivision is five
feet to ten feet above the curb line on Lynwood Boulevard, with a retaining wall located in the
boulevard, the full width of the parcel.
Because the buildable area is so small (40 feet x 40 feet) and the grade differences between the
street and lot are quite extreme, we would suggest the applicant be required to furnish a plan
showing how a house and garage could be placed on the lot. The plan should also include
proposed grading and its affect on the existing home and the adjacent property to the east and
how the existing retaining walls will be dealt with.
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth. Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-marl: mfra@mfra.com
Jori Sutherland, Planning and Zoning
September 29, 2000
Page 2
o
Drainage and utility easements should be required along both sides of the new lot line separating
these two parcels. The remaining easements around the exterior lot lines was a requirement of
the previous minor subdivision.
There are no in-place utility services provided for the new vacant parcel. They will need to be
installed from the City's watermain and sewer main in Lynwood Boulevard. A street excavation
permit will be required for this work.
o
The City records show that this parcel was assessed only one unit charge for the 1980 street
improvement project. It is the City's policy to collect one unit charge when properties are
subdivided and additional building sites are created. The City records should also be checked for
any deficient sanitary sewer or watermain unit charges.
Recommendations
1. Provide preliminary site and grading plan, showing how topographical issues will be dealt with.
2. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan to be approved by the City Engineer at time of
building permit application.
3. Provide drainage and utility easements along the new lot line separating the two parcels, five feet
wide on each side.
4. The new sanitary sewer and water services either be installed or some type of financial guarantee
be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
5. One deferred street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
cc: Loren Gordon, Hoisington Koegler Group
s:\main:Wlou 13039:\Correspondeneksutherland9-29
RECEIVED
SEP O .o, .200,.0
MOUND PLANNING &
Planning Commission Date:k._/
City Council Date: _~/~'~,
Application for
MINOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND
City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0607, Fax: 472-0620
C~/ 20~)~-) Case No 0(,1 -52
/ ...~,1~.,t Application Fee:
$75~00
Distribution:
-i [ City Planner
~! ~',1' ~',,~ 0Public Works
"i 7~,/~ 'u City Engineer
'? iu /~' DNR
c,4 /// /~.,d, Parks
(/,:/// ~: ~ ~Other
Escrow Deposit: $1.000
Deficient Unit Charges?
Delinquent Taxes?
VARIANCE REQUIRED? ~/~(~
Please type or print the following information:
PROPERTY Subject Address
INFORMATION
EXISTING Lot .~'~_. ~- )~Z 77'~ C/;/~' D Block Plat#
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION Subdivision '~ ['] ~ I~- y, PiE#
ZONING (~
DISTRICT Circle: R-1 R-lA R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
APPLICANT
The applicant is: ,Z~owner __other:
(M)
OWNER Name
(if other than
applicant) Address
Phone (H)
Name D J~,~ r~/~s
SURVEYOR/ '~0 30
ENGINEER Address
Phone (H)
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property?/~yes, ( )
no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
Thisa/~~rnustbo~~fthesubjectproperty,/~~xH~
Own'~r's Signature
~o00 ,
or an explanation ~iven why this is not the case.
Owner's Signature
Revised 07-13-00
Revised 07-13-00
Date
CITY OF MOUND
HARDC, DVER CALCULATIONS
{IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
PROPERTY ADDRESS; ~'ZI2
OWNER'S NAME: ~'~E.. C_..Oz::,z::::,C:,/,...~
LOTAREA .~~¢. SO. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .............. I '7/~'-/.~ I
LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record*) ....... I I
LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 15% = {for detached buildings only)
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225,Subd. 6. B. 1. {see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official.
HOUSE
LENGTH WIDTH
SQFT
DETACHED BLDGS
~ (GARAGE/SHED)
DRIVEWAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
DECKS Open decks (1/4" min.
opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under ere
not counted es hardcover
OTHER L A~,Jc~Sr_~lc~-
X =
X ~
X = i%~c~
X =
TOTAL DECK ..........................
X = '-/2_
TOTAL OTHER .........................
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE I
PREPARED BY ~ ~_ ~ :[:2~,,,/~ D t~. c.,~.oo ~ DATE
~ CITY OF MOUND
HARDCDVER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SUi~FACE COVERAGE)
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
OWNER'S NAME~'
LOT AREA . ID, ~J~ SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .............. I 32~'7
LOT ARE~-~. SQ. FT. X 40% = {for Lots of Record*) .......
J~
LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only)
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225,Subd. 6. B. 1. {see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official.
LENGTH WIDTH SO FT
HOUSE X =
DETACHED BLDGS
(GARAGE/SHED)
X :
TOTAL HOUSE .........................
X :
X =
TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS .................
DRIVEWAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
DECKS Open decks {114' min.
opening between boards} with a
per,~ious surface under ara
not counted es hardcover
X =
X =
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ..................
X =
X =
~ X --
TOTAL DECK ..........................
OTHER
TOTALOTHER .., ......... ......... "~...
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
I lNI~FR / OVER (inrlic~te diff,r~nce) .H..A..I~..c~..v..r~....~.~.A. ~..c.~'..~.~-. ......
PREPARED BY ~-"~.~' .~. "~ ~rVI..D ~'. ('J;;~E~ ~/~...... DATE
ADDRESS:
Cli'Y C)F MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SItEET
StlRYEY ON FILE?L,,~)I NO
I,O'1' OF RECORD? YES I NO
YARD ' [ IHRE(FFION I
IIOUSR .........
FRONT N $ E w
FRONT N S E W
SIDE N S E w
SIDE N S E W
REAR N S E W
TOP OF BLUFF
~ARA(;R, 8lIEU ..... DL~TACIIFD BIIILI)IN(i,q
FRONT N $ E W
FRONT N S E W
SIDE N S E W
REAR N $ E W
L~KE N S E W
TOP ()F BLUFF
IIARDCOVER 30~,, (}R 4oi
C(}Ni.'ORMIN(;7 YES / NO / ? HY:
R1
R1A
. RI
RKI~IIIREI)
I$'
50'
10' OR 30'
ZONING DISTRICt, LOT SIZ~WIDTH:
zo,ooo/go' ~1 ~,soo/o
6,000/40:* B2 20,000/80
~.ooo-7~ ~3 ~o.ooo/~o
1¢,ooo/~o~
8~ ORD. l! 30,000/100
EXISTING/PROPOSED
EXISTING LOT SIZE:,
LOT WID'IH:
LOT 9E~'I'tl:
VARIANCE
4' OR 6'
4' OR 6'
4'
10' UR 30'
JDATED:
Thl~ Zonln Infmmalion Sheet only summadzcs a ~,don of fl~e re~iten~nfs ~lli~d In d~e City of Mpu~ Zoning Ordinate. For fur~cr information, conUct ~e City of Moun
~',~ ~ ~'~.~:~, .J ~-~.~'~/~ ~
, , .... . ~ ~ ~ ~ - .. ~. .. . : ,
.-.,,
~ ?--" 7 ~ . '.~ ~;., ~/ ~;'.~ ~. ~=~; :. , .... . ....~ ....... rt..i:.: ......
· ' .... . m ~ . ' ~ ',; , · ~ ~. ~, ~. - ~ · z~g~ .........
~..=/.-~' ,, ~_ ~---~...
,~-~c~.,~.l.~'t~'T,C'.UO'r,~'r~?Oq;~'~'~ *~ ,'~" '~d,?.i-' ' 4: ' I ""~"~, '
% ~.1~ ~?'~'~'l
. uTS
~L~ R~&~ .................................
...... ~--~ ............ . ...........................................
.:-.. , 7 ~ ~/~ ~ c ~ =~ = ~ ~ ~--'~o :
.:."~ ~ ~) ~
.-~'" ~ ~ ~ · .~-~ = : -'""~ ~-~.~'> ~ ~ ~ 44 ~131~ '~ '
'.':
/ , ~i ~1~1 ~ ~"~F4'f''~''-'- ~ ~-~'""-' '~ ~'-''"" ' ' ' ......
RESOLUTION # 00-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING
A LAKESIDE SETBACK FOR A DECK
ON TI-IE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5456 BARTLETT BLVD.,
P & Z CASE #00-53
WHEREAS, the applicant, Patricia Harty, has requested a lakeside setback variance to
rebuild a deck on property located at 5456 Bartlett Blvd. as indicated below:
Lakeside setback
; and,
Existing Required Variance
37 feet 50 feet 13 feet
WHEREAS, the existing deck was constructed with the townhome; and,
WHEREAS, both structural supports and decking boards will be replaced to the same
dimensions as currently exist. The lakeside setback will remain at 37 feet; and,
Wl:IEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended that
the Council approve the lakeside setback variance as recommended by Staff; and,
NOW, TglEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City does hereby approve the lakeside setback variance.
2. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the
Hennepin County Property Information System:
DRAFT
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2000
Those present: Chair GeoffMichael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, Bill
Voss, and Frank Weiland. Absent and excused: Commissioners Orvin Burma, Jerry
Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Council Liaison Bob Brown; Staff present: Building
Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Diana Mestad.
1.1 CASE #00-53: VARIANCE, 5456 BARTLETT BLVD., PATRICIA
HARTY, 5456 BARTLETT BLVD., LOT 5, BLOCK 1, CHANNELTOWN.
PID #24-117-24-22-0010.
The City Building Official pointed out the survey on page 22 and that this is replacement
of an existing deck and does not change the size.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the request.
Written Comments from Commissioner Mueller:
No comment.
MOTION, by Weiland, seconded by Voss to accept Staff's recommendation.
Motion carried. 5-0.
PLANNING REPORT
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP
DATE: October 9, 2000
SUBJECT: Variance Request
APPLICANT: Patricia Harty
CASE NUMBER: 00-53
HKG FILE NUMBER: 00-5
LOCATION: 5456 Bartlett Blvd.
ZONING: Residential District R-1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted a request to rebuild an existing deck a lakeside
setback. The variance request is as follows:
Proposed Required Variance
Lakeside setback 37 feet 50 feet 13 feet
The existing deck has rotted and is in need of replacement. The applicant is proposing to replace
the deck to the same 14 feet by 10 feet. The applicant states the deck was part of the original
building constructed in 1969. The survey shows the 6 townhome units all have about the same
setback from the channel. This replacement would not change any of the existing conditions on
the property.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council
approval of the request.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
Planning Commission Date:
City Council Date:
Distribution:
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0607, Fax: 472-0620
~///..~/~ a Ci~ Planner
~/~' Ci~ Engineer
?// ~/~ o Public Works
/
Application Fee: $~[00.00
Case No.
PARK
Other
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
LEGAL
DESC.
PROPERTY
OWNER
Lot ~ ...
Block /
Subdivision (/~(~ ~,,,., -,~ ~'~.~./~-/~, .//
PID~ ~ ~- / / 7~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~/~ Pla~
ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA ~-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
Address ~-~ ~ ~~ '~~~"~-~ ¢
Phone
(H) ~2~~ ~ ~ ~) (M)
APPLICANT Name
(IF OTHER Address
THAN Phone
oWNER) (H) (W)
(M)
Has an application ever been made for zoning, Variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and
provide copies of resolutions.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stodes, type of use, etc.):
Revised 07-11-00
Variance Application, P. 2
Case No. O0-,S~
Do the existing structures comply w!th all.~l'rea, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning distdct
in which it is located? Yes (), No ('~. If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for
variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
o
SETBACKS:
REQUIRED
REQUESTED
(or existing)
VARIANCE
Front Yard: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Rear Yard: (NS E W )
Lakeside: ~ E W )
: (NSEW)
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover:
ff. ff. ff.
ff. _ft. ff.
ff. ff. ff.
fi;' ft. ft.
ft. , q 7 ft. /~ ft.
ff. ff. ft.
ff. ff. ff.
sq ft sq ft sq ft
sq ft sq ft sq ft
Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes (), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
Please
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses
permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( )~ting situation
( ) too shallow ( ) shape (v,~other: specify
Revised 07-11-00
Variance Application, P, 3
Case No.
o
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain:
Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes (), No (). If yes, explain:
Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a vadance peculiar only to the property described in
this petition? Yes (), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith am true and accurate. I consent to the ent~ in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining
and removing such notices as may be required by law.
Applicant, s Signat~~~_~t~~ ~
Revised 07-11-00
Date
Date
69-l~O
7-22-69
RESOLUTION NO. 69-150
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF
CHANNEL TOWN. ADDITION
SUBJECT TO TEE DEDICATION OF A SEVEN-FOOT EASEMENT
ABUTTING COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY #125
AND RECORDING AND REGISTERING TEE ATTACHED
"DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS"
ATTACHED ~0 AS EXHIBIT A
WHEREAS, the Developer of Channel Town Addition has prepared a plat for
replatting of Lot 18 and part of Lot 19, Auditor's Subdivision
#1?O, and
the plat has been approved by the Planning Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND
MINNESOTA:
That the plat as presented be accepted providing a seven-
foot easement along Bartlett Boulevard is dedicated to
Hennepin County and that the Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions as attached be registered with
Hennepin County.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of July, 1969.
0
C)
"Z,.
r-'-
RECORD? YES / NO
YARD I
IIOUSE .........
FRONT
FRONT
SII)F.
SIDE
REAR
I.AKE
TOI' OF RI.UFF
DI II !.;( 'TI( )N
N S E W
N S E W
N S I_: W
N S F: W
N S F. W
N S F W
ZONING INFOI(MATION SIIEET
ZONING DISFRICT. LOT SIZE/WIDTH:
~l 10,000/60 B1 ?,500/0
RIA ~ 000/40 B2 20,000/B0
s.ooo/4o ¥ n~ xo.ooo/so
14,000/.ii.O'~
R3 SEE ORD. I1 30,000/100
RE~I,IREI~ I EXISTING/PROPOSED
15'
OR .1(1'
EX1SllNG LOT SIZE: -
LOT WIDTIi:
LOT DEffI'H:
VARIANCE
GARAGE, gllEI) ..... L~F. TAf'I IFI) III II[ ,DIN( ;S
FRONT N S E W
FRONF N S E W
SIDE N S F. W
SIDE N S l~ W
REAR N ,~ F W
LAKF. N S I~ W
I'OP ()F Ill .UFF
4' (IR6'
4' OR6'
4'
50'
I(1' {}R t0'
Planning l)cpaitmcn~ al 472-06(X).
· - tJ
' -.d
ft.) -
RESOLUTION # 00-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCES
FOR AN ADDITION TO THE HOME ON THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 4600 CUMBERLAND ROAD,
P & Z CASE #00-55
WHEREAS, the applicant, Paul Glynn, has requested front yard setback variances to
build a two-story addition on property located at 4600 Cumberland Road as indicated below:
Proposed Required Variance
Front yard setback 7.8 feet (existing) 20 feet 12.2 feet
(Stratford)
Front yard setback 3.5 feet (proposed) 20 feet 16.5 feet
(Cumberland)
; and,
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-lA Zoning District that requires
6,000 square feet of lot area and 20 feet front yard setbacks; and,
WHEREAS, The applicant is proposing to remove the deck along the Cumberland street
frontage to make room to build a 6 feet by 8 feet first story addition to ' square off' this comer of
the house. A second story addition would be added over the first floor kitchen and t.v. room area.
The first floor would keep the existing 6.3 feet setback from Cumberland Lane; and,
WHEREAS, the proposal would improve the property and lessen the existing
encroachment along Cumberland Road; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended that
the Council approve the variance as recommended by Staff; and,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City does hereby approve the variance requests.
2. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the
Hennepin County Property Information System:
DRAFT
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2000
Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, Bill
Voss, and Frank Weiland. Absent and excused: Commissioners Orvin Burma, Jerry
Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Council Liaison Bob Brown; Staffpresent: Building
Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Diana Mestad.
1.2
CASE #00-55: VARIANCE, 4600 CUMBERLAND ROAD, PAUL GLYNN.
4600 CUMBERLAND ROAD, LOTS 1, 2, 28, 29, 30, BLOCK 8.
WYCHWOOD PID #19-117-23-32-0184.
The City Building Official stated that this was a proposal to remove a deck and build an
addition, which would actually result in less encroachment than now exists.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the request.
Written Comments from Commissioner Mueller:
No comment.
MOTION, by Voss, seconded by Glister to accept Staff's recommendation.
Discussion:
Weiland asked about item 2 on page 35 of the packet that referred to Section 23.404 and
wondered what that section referred to. The City Building Official stated this was an old
ordinance regarding nonconforming use. He further stated that the previous request was
approved and the new request would result in less encroachment. He also pointed out
that the house was in place before the road was extended. The City Building Official felt
this would improve the use and function of the property.
Weiland asked about paragraph 7, page 34 of the packet that stated "... the alteration
may not increase the number of units..." and stated that the Commission would not be
adhering to this point if this was approved. Weiland stated this made this an issue that
could not be debated.
The City Building Official stated that the Staff recommendation would give flexibility in
this matter.
Chair Michael called the question.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 1 (Weiland)
Motion carried. 4-1.
Weiland stated for the record that he voted against this because he felt the applicant knew
about the road when he bought the house.
The applicant, Paul Glynn, addressed the Commission and stated that he bought the
house in 1978 and at that time Cumberland Road was undeveloped. The road stopped a
block from his house. The road went through in the 1980s and restricted his use of the
property.
Weiland stated for the record that pages 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 in the meeting packet were
unreadable and did not do the Planning Commission any good.
PLANNING REPORT
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
Illlrt
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP
DATE: October 9, 2000
SUBJECT: Variance Request
APPLICANT: Paul Glynn
CASE NUMBER: 00-55
HKG FILE NUMBER: 00-5
LOCATION: 4600 Cumberland Road.
ZONING: Residential District R-lA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted a request to build a two-story addition and
remove an existing deck. The variance request is as follows:
Proposed Required Variance
Front yard setback 7.8 feet (existing) 20 feet 12.2 feet
(Stratford)
Front yard setback 3.5 feet (proposed) 20 feet 16.5 feet
(Cumberland)
The applicant is proposing to remove the deck along the Cumberland street frontage to make
room to build a 6 feet by 8 feet first story addition to 'square off' this comer of the house. A
second story addition would be added over the first floor kitchen and t.v. room area. The first
floor would keep the existing 6.3 feet setback fi-om Cumberland Lane.
The proposal appears to be an improvement to the property and would lessen the existing
encroachment along Cumberland.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council
approval of the request.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
09/06/00 ~t'04: ~
z./'~ -~0 VARIANCE APPLICATION
v'V Mou.o
~'~.~ %~1~3~41 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
~',.~ ,/__.) Phone: 472-0607, Fax: 472-0620
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
LEGAL
DESC.
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
Planning Commission Date:.
Block
Subdivision
PID#
ZONING DISTRICT R-i R-lA R-2 R-3
PAID
S E P 1 3 ?.000
CiTY OF IVlOUi.;D
Application Fee: $100.00
Case No. (~0 --
PROPERTY
OWNER
Phone
(H) y'? 7_- i?/5'" (w) -----
PARK
Other
~oo1
B-1
Pla¢
B-2
B-3
(M) '-
APPLICANT Name
(IF OTHER Address
THAN Phone
OWNER) (H)
ON) (M)
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) anc
provide copies of resolutions.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stodes, type of use, etc.):
09/06/00 04:13 FAX CITY OF .IlOUND ~002
Case No.
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for ~he zoning district
in which it is located? Yes (), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for
variance request, i,e. setback, lot area, otc.):
SFTBACKS:
REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE
(or existing)
Front Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. .ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ff. ft. ft.
Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ff;' ff. ft.
Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
: (NSF_W) fi. ft. ft.
Street Frontage: ft. ..~ ..~ ft. ft.
Lot Size: sq ft /~/~ sq ft sq ft
Hardcover: sq ft .~' qcr~ sq ft sq ft
Does the present use of the property conform to afl regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes (), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonabie use for any of the uses
permitted in that zoning district?
Please
( ) too narrow
( ) too small
( ) too shallow
describe:
( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) drainage ( ) existing situation
( ) shape ( ) other:, specify
vananca Al~l)lica~on, P. 3
Case No.O0-~.x~ .~
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No'~x~. If yes, explain: /,
Was the hardship ='sated by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes/~, No (). If yes, explain:
Are the conditions of ,hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the prope~ described in
this petition? Yes ,~, No (). If no, list some other proper~es which am similarly affec*,ed? d~,
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements c~ntaJned in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are ~e and accurate. ! consent to the entry in or upcn he premises described in this
application by any authcrized official of the City of Mound for b~e purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining
and removing such notices as may be required by law.
Owner's Signature
Applicant's Signature
RECEIVED
MOUe. ID ~L~,[,]t'I!~I~ ,..,-
RECEIVEF_..,
MOUND PLANNING
RECEIVE[":
SEF ! 3 2000
MOUND PLANNING &
193
193
July 23, 1991
RESOLUTION ~91-104
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOGNIZE
AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SETBACK TO
STRUCTURAL ROOF REPAIRS FOR LOTS 1~ 2~ 2S~ 29~ & 30~ BLOCK
WYCHWOOD~ PID %19-117-23 32 0184, 4600 CUMBERLAND ROAD
P&Z CA~E NO. 91-033
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to
recognize existing nonconforming front yard setbacks to allow
structural roof repairs for Lots 1, 2, 28, 29 & 30, Block 8,
Wychwood, PID #19-117-23 32 0184, and;
WHEREAS, the existing dwelling structure is setback 2.2
feet from the front property line facing Cumberland and 7.8 feet
to the front property line facing Stratford, and;
WHEREAS, the reconstruction of the roof represents a
substantial improvement and would substantially extend the life
of the structure, and;
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-3
Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code
requires a lot area of 6,000 square feet, a front yard setback of
30 feet, side yard setbacks of 10 feet and a rear yard setback of
15 feet, and;
WHEREAS, removal and replacement of just the shingles
is an option available to the applicant without a variance, and
this, in effect, could extend the life of the structure as long
as replacing the rafters would, and;
WHEREAS, the front steps need to be replaced and the
porch is in need of some structural repairs, and;
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that
alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful,
nonconforming residential property when the alterations will
improve the livability thereof, but the alteration may not
increase the number of units, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
request and does recommend approval to afford the owners
reasonable use of their property.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
194
July 23, 1991
The city does hereby recognize the existing nonconforming
setbacks resulting in a 26.5 foot front yard setback
variance to Cumberland and a 22.2 foot front yard setback
variance to Stratford to allow reconstruction of the roof
including any repairs required with respect to the front
stairs, deck and porch on the Manchester side of the
property for Lots 1, 2, 28, 29, & 30, Block 8, Wychwood, PID
#19-117-23 32 0184.
®
The City Council authorizes the violations and authorizes
the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404,
Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding
that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject
to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
It is determined that the livability of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the
following alterations to a nonconforming use of the property
to afford the owners reasonable use of their land.
Structural roof repairs and necessary repairs to the
front steps, deck and porch.
e
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property:
I, ots 1, 28, 28, 2g, 30, Block 8, W~bwood, PID #1g-117-23 32
0184.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to
Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
Se
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs
for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued
until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Johnson and seconded by Councilmember Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
195
July 23, 1991
Attest: City Clerk
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
125
July 23, 1991
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - JULY 23; 1991
1.9 CASE %91-033:
PAUL GLFNN, 4600 CUMBERLAND ROAD, LOTS 1, 2,
28, 29 E 30, BLOCK 8, NYCHWOOD, PID %19-117-
23 32 0184, VARIANCE - RECOGNI2E EXISTING
NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SETBACK
The Building Official explained the request.
Commission recommended approval.
The Planning
Johnson moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %91-104 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH TH~ PLkNNING
COMMISSION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING
NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SETBACK TO
]%LLOW STRUCTURAL ROOF REPAIR~ FOR LOTS
lv 2v 28~ 29 & 30~ BLOCK St WYCHWOOD~
PID %19-117-23 32 0184, 4600 CUMBERLAND
ROAD~ P & Z CASE %91-033
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
MINUTES OF ~ MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 8, 1991
Case No. 91-033: Paul Glynn, 4600 C~mherland Road, Lots 1, 2,
28, 29, & 30, Block 8, W¥chwood, PID ~19-117-23 32 0184.
VARIANCE - structural roof reDa[rs.
Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicants
request for a variance to allow major structural repairs to the
existing roof. The property is nonconforming due to inadequate
front yard setbacks to both Cumberland and Stratford. The struc-
ture is setback 2.2 feet to Cumberland and 7.8 feet to Stratford.
The required setback to both street fronts is 30 feet.
The reconstruction of the roof represents a substantial improve-
ment to the nonconformance and would substantially extend the
life of the structure. Removal and replacement of just the
shingles is an option available to the applicant without a
variance.
Staff reviewed this case with the City Planner who did not recom-
mend approval based on the substantial encroachment.
The Building Official commented that re-shingling could, in ef-
fect, extend the life of the structure as long as replacing the
rafters would. Further, when the ridge line is sagging on a
roof, basically that can be followed down to the foundation, the
walls are 2'x4' and do not meet today's standards, the stairway
rise and run is inadequate, the stairway width and headroom is in
adequate, the windows are inadequate, the floor joists are over-
spanned or undersized and are probably notched more than what is
allowed today. In addition, the back entry and stairway is pull-
ing away from the house (on Manchester side).
Glynn commented that the concrete stairway is pulling the floor
of his porch away from the house, he would like to eliminate
those stairs and replace them with wooden stairs and then pull
the porch back to the house.
The applicant also commented that when the house was constructed,
and when he purchased it, Cumberland was not improved. Permits
were obtained within the last ten years, by the applicant, to
remodel the interior and add a deck. Michael commented that the
proposed improvements will not increase the bulk of the noncon-
formity.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Michael to recommend
approval of a 25.5 foot front yard setback variance to
Cumberland and a 22.2 foot front yard setback variance
to Stratford to allow reconstruction of the roof includ-
ing any repairs required with respect to the front
stairs, deck and porch on the Manchester side of the
property. Motion carried 6 to 2. Those in favor were:
Clapsaddle, Mueller, Jensen, Meyer, Hanus and Michael.
Those opposed were: Weiland and ross.
Weiland commented that due to the existing safety hazards such as
the inadequate stairway, he does not feel the life should be ex-
tended. Voss commented that according to the Building Official
and City Planner's comments the structure is grossly nonconform-
ing, in poor conditions, and it is poor planning to allow this
structure to be improved.
This case will be heard by the City Council on July 23, 1991.
CtTY of XlOUND
STAFF RECONHENDATION
534' MA',"~vOCD ~OAE'
612!
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION:
SUBJECT:
ZONING:
Planning Commission Agenda of July B, 1991
Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
ion Sutherland, Building Official
91-033
Paul Glynn
4600 Cumberland Road
Lots 1, 2, 28, 29, 30, Block 8, Wychwood
P[D #19-117-23 32 0184
Variance Request
R-3 Single Family Residential
The applicant seeks a building permit to reconstruct the existing roof. The
property is nonconforming due to inadequate front yard setbacks to both Cum-
berland and Stratford. The structure is setback 2.2 feet to Cumberland Lane,
the required setback is 30 feet, resulting in a variance request of 27.8 feet;
and the existing front yard setback to Stratford Road is 7.8 feet, the
required is 30 feet, resulting in a variance request of 22.2 feet.
The following history is on record with the property file:
Building Permit #7386
Building Permit #4461
Building Permit #4125
Building Permit #4404
Interior Remodel
Detached Garage (Res. #77-293)
Deck
SoFfit Repair
COmmENTS
The reconstruction of the roof represents a substantial improvement to the
nonconformance and would substantially extend the life of the structure.
Removal and replacement of just the shingles is an option available to the ap-
plicant without a variance.
I have reviewed this case with the City Planner who does not recommend ap-
proval based on the substantial encroachment.
This case will be heard by the City Council on July 23, 1991.
neighbors have been notified,
The abutting
CITY OF MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SHEET
SURVEY ON FILE.'? YES
.OT OF RECORD.'? YES
ItOUSE .........
FRONT
FRONT
SIDE
SIDE
REAR
LAKE
TOP OF BLUFF
NO
/ NO
DIRECTION
N S E W
N S E W
N S E W
NSEW
N S E W
N S E W
ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE~WIDTH:
R1 10,000/60 B1 '~,500/0
R1A 6,000/40 B2 20,000/80
.....a-~ 6,0'00/40- '"~3 10,000/60
14, ooo/so/
SE~ ORD. I1 30.000/100
RF~D [ EXISTING/PROPOSED
15'
50'
10' OR 30'
EXISTING LOT SIZE:
LOT WIDTH:
LOT DEPTH:
VARIANCE
GARAGE, SHED ..... DETACHED BUILDINGS
FRONT N S E W
FRONT N S E W
SIDE N S E W
SIDE N S E W
REAR N S E W
LAKE N S E W
FOP OF BLUFF
4' OR6'
4' OR6'
4'
50'
Iff OR 30'
r-[ARDCOVER 30% OR 40% ~-
C()NFORMING? YES / NO ''~ } BY: I DATEI):
rhi,~ Zoning /n/bfmation Sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements out!incd in file City of Mound 77oning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound
I O
RESOLUTION # 00-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDMSION TO
CREATE TWO LOTS FROM THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
6349 WALNUT ROAD, LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 10, MOUND TERRACE
P & Z CASE # 00-56
WHEREAS, the applicant, has submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create two
additional lots from the existing parcel at 6349 Walnut Road; and,
WI-IEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 Zoning District that requires a
10,000 square feet lot area, 30 feet front yard setbacks, and 10 feet side yard setbacks for non lots
of record; and,
WHEREAS, The lot has approximately 48,404 square feet of area as is currently held.
The subdivision would result in three lots, all of which meet the lot area and width minimums for
the R-1 district; and,
WHEREAS, the existing residence will be moved to a conforming location on Parcel A;
and,
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision would reclassify the proposed parcels to non-lots of
record, subjecting them to all applicable zoning provisions; and,
WltEREAS, proposed building locations shown meet zoning setback minimums for
non-lots of record. Hardcover is under 30% on each parcel; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended
approval of the minor subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota as follows:
The City does hereby grant a minor subdivision of the property pursuant to Section
330:20, Subdivision 1.B with the following conditions:
a. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan be approved by the City
Engineer prior to release of an approved resolution.
b. Provide utility and drainage easements along all new lot lines, 5 feet wide on side
lot lines, and 10 feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
c. The new sanitary sewer and water services either be installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
d. One deferred street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
e. Park dedication fee of $1000 be paid at the time of building permit issuance
2. This Minor Subdivision is granted for the following new legally described property:
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution and
easements with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording.
DRAFT
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2000
Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, Bill
Voss, and Frank Weiland. Absent and excused: Commissioners Orvin Burma, Jerry
Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Council Liaison Bob Brown; Staff present: Building
Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Diana Mestad.
2;3
CASE #00-56: MINOR SUBDIVISION, 6349 WALNUT ROAD, KEVIN
HINRICKS, 6349 WALNUT ROAD, LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 10, MOUND
TERRACE, PID# 14-117-24-35-0065.
The City Building Official stated the applicant was requesting to make two lots from the
existing survey shown on pages 48-49. He stated that the applicant is a contractor and
would be able to move the house over. He stated that this would make three rectangular
conforming parcels on the lots.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve the minor
subdivision as requested with the following conditions:
1. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan be approved by the City Engineer
prior to release of an approved resolution.
2. Provide utility and drainage easements along all new lot lines, 5 feet wide on side
lot lines, and 10 feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
3. The new sanitary sewer and water services either are installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. One deferred street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
5. Park dedication fee of $1,000 be paid at the time of the building permit issuance if
the $500 park dedication fee in the May subdivision approval wasn't collected. If
the fee was collected, a park dedication fee of $500 shall be paid.
Written Comments from Commissioner Mueller:
This is another example of piecemeal subdivision since this lot was created within the
past year. However, I understand that it is a different owner who is the applicant and it is
conceivable that the intent of this applicant was not to skirt the major subdivision
provisions. I was surprised that the previous subdivision information was not included in
our packet as there may be information pertinent to this case in that prior case. My
concerns with this subdivision are drainage issues and a driveway which runs adjacent to
the foundation of the house which is being moved causing future foundation problems
(trust me - I know). Also I thought there was a concern in regard to the improvement of
Walnut Lane which was part of the prior subdivision request. I'm not positive on this last
item because the prior subdivision was not included in the package.
DRAFT
Recommendations from the City Engineer:
1. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan to be approved by the City
Engineer at time of building permit application.
2. Provide drainage and utility easements along all new lot lines, five feet wide on
side lot lines, and ten feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
3. The new sanitary sewer and water services either are installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. One deferred street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
MOTION, by Weiland, seconded by Hasse, to accept Staff's recommendation
including the City Engineer's recommendations.
Discussion:
Voss stated that he would be abstaining from voting on this case because he was
connected with the sale of the property. He further stated that the comment from Mueller
that this was a piecemeal subdivision was not tree and that there was no intent to skirt the
major subdivision requirements. Voss also wondered if Mueller had confused Walnut
Road with another road of the same name.
The City Building Official stated that also thought Mueller had confused the two streets,
as there was no improvement needed on the road involved in this case.
Weiland asked whether the existing garage conforms. The City Building Official
confirmed that it was conforming.
The City Building Official pointed out that page 48 of the packet is a survey submitted
for parcel 3 that has been issued a building permit. He stated that the applicant has
already provided considerable survey information in relationship to this case and that is
not a piecemeal subdivision.
Chair Michael called the question.
AYES: 3
NAYS 1 (Hasse)
ABSTAIN 1 (Voss)
Motion carried. 3-1.
Hasse stated for the record that he voted against this because the ordinance requires a
driveway and house location before a subdivision is created. He felt it was a question of
fairness to approve this when the submission is incomplete.
PLANNING REPORT
Hoisington Kocgler Group Inc.
fin
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP
DATE: October 9, 2000
SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision
OWNER: Kevin Henrichs
CASE NUMBER: 00-56
HKG FILE NUMBER: 00-5
LOCATION: 6349 Walnut Road
ZONING: Residential District R- 1
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The applicant has submitted a request for a minor subdivision
to create two lots from an existing lot of record. The property consists of lots 3 and 4, Block 10
of Mound Terrace. The lot has approximately 48,404 square feet of area as is currently held.
The Commission may remember a request in May to subdivide this property (Case #00-17). That
request split the parcel in two. This proposal would create three buildable lots. The applicant is
able to accomplish this by moving the existing residence to a conforming location on Parcel A.
The two new lots meet lot area and width minimums for the R-1 District. Additionally, proposed
building locations are shown which meet zoning setback minimums. Hardcover is under 30% on
each parcel.
Park dedication fees will need to be paid for two new parcels if the May approval hasn't been
received. The City Engineer's report details utility drainage easement items, grading and
drainage and deficient street charges.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council
approve the minor subdivision as requested with the following conditions.
1. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan be approved by the City Engineer
prior to release of an approved resolution.
2. Provide utility and drainage easements along all new lot lines, 5 feet wide on side
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
p. 2
#00-56 Minor Subdivision - 6349 Walnut Road.
October 9, 2000
lot lines, and 10 feet in width along the fi.om and rear lot lines.
3. The new sanitary sewer and water services either be installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. One deferred street unit charge in the mount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
5. Park dedication fee of $1000 be paid at the time of building permit issuance if the
$500 park dedication fee in the May subdivision approval wasn't collected. If the
fee was collected, a park dedication fee of $500 shall be paid.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
Engineering , Planning · Surveying
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
September 28, 2000
Jon Sutherland, Planning and Zoning
John Cameron, City Engineer
City of Mound
Minor Subdivision - Hinrich Property
6349 Walnut Road
Case No. 00-56
MFRA # 13040
Comments
The property under this request was created by a minor subdivision (Case #00-17), which was
approved by the City last spring. The applicant is requesting approval to redivide the parcel
containing the existing home and relocate said house westerly approximately 32 feet.
The surveys submitted with the application shows tentative house locations but does not contain
any proposed grading or building elevations; therefore a final grading, drainage and erosion
control plan will be required when application is made for a building permit.
3. The proposed drainage and utility easements as shown on the survey will need to be provided as
part of the minor subdivision.
There are no in-place utility services for proposed parcel B. They will need to be installed from
the City's watermain and sewer main in Walnut Road. A street excavation permit will be
required for this work.
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth. Minnesota · 55447
/)hone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mail: mfra~mfra, corn
4.574-
Jon Sutherland, Planning and Zoning
September 28, 2000
Page 2
o
The City records show that this parcel was assessed only one unit charge for the 1980 street
improvement project. It is the City's policy to collect one unit charge when properties are
subdivided and additional building sites are created.
Recommendations
1. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan to be approved by the City Engineer at time of
building permit application.
2. Provide drainage and utility easements along ail new lot lines, five fbet wide on side lot lines,
and ten feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
3. The new sanitary sewer and water services either be installed or some type of financial guarantee
be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. One deferred street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 shall be paid.
cc: Loren Gordon, Hoisington Koegler Group
s:\main:\Mou 13040:\Correspondeneksutherland9-28
Application for
MINOR SUBDIVISION OF I ANn
City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN
Phone: 472-0607, Fax: 472-0620
55364
!lanning Commission Date:~ _~d~/:,
City Council Date: ~/2~-.
Distribution:
~'//~/[/~ City Planner ~'¢~/o0 DNR
'7'//.~.,'/'o0 Parks
;/'//'~'//? D Public Works l/~ '
Case No. //)~/~ -'-¢'
Application Fee:
Escrow Deposit:
Deficient Unit Charges?
Delinquent Taxes?
VARIANCE REQUIRED?
$75,00
$1.000
Please type or print the following information:
PROPERTY Subject Address__~_. 3~ ?
INFORMATION
EXISTING Lot , Block /O Plat#
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION Subdivision
ZONING
DISTRICT Circle: R-1 R-1A R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
APPLICANT The applicant is: ){owner other:
Address ~ ~ ¢~ ~--~
Phone (H) ~7~ ~O [ ~)
OWNER Name
(if other than
applicant) Address
Phone(H) 0/V) (M)
Name Hy-Land Survey±nq PA
SURVEYOR/
ENGINEER Address 8700 Jeffe~'son Highway
Phone (H) (W) 763-493-5761 (M)
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( )
no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
This application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or an explanation given why this is not the case.
Owner's Signature Date
Owner's Signature
Revised 07-13-00
Revised 07-13-00
Date
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
OWNER'S NAME:
LOT AREA 19,714
LOT AREA
LOT AREA
PARCEL "A"
CITY OF MOUND
HARDC~VER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
SQ. FT. X 3O%
SQ. FT. X 40%
SQ. FT. X 15%
= (for all lots) ..............
= (for Lots of Record*) .......
= (for detached buildings only) ..
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225,Subd. 6. B. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official.
HOUSE
DETACHED BLDGS
(GARAGE/SHED)
DRIVEWAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
DECKS Open decks {1/4' min.
opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are
not counted as hardcover
OTHER
X X =
X
TOTAL HOUSE .........................
24 X 36 = 864
X =
TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS .................
X = 2300
X = 180
X =
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ..................
X =
X =
X =
TOTAL DECK ..........................
X =
X
TOTAL OTHER .........................
14R~
864
?4RN
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE I 4RN7 I
UNDER / 6~5~ (indicate difference) .... ,.~ ......................... I 1107 I
PREPARED BY DATE September 12,
2000
CITY OF MOUND
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
OWNER'S NAME:
LOT AREA / ~ ~'~. SQ. FT. X 30%
LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40%
LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 15%
= (for all lots) ..............
= (for Lots of Record*) .......
= (for detached buildings only)
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225,Subd. 6.8.1. (see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official.
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
,,/~ x ~6, = ~ ~o
X =
X =
HOUSE
TOTAL HOUSE .........................
X =
X =
TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS .................
DETACHED BLDGS
(GARAGE/SHED)
DRIVEWAY, PARKING /~¢~ X ~ -7 =
AREAS, SIDEWALKS, X
ETC. X =
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ..................
X =
X =
X =
TOTALDECK ..........................
X =
X =
TOTAL OTHER .........................
DECKS Open decks (1/4" min.
opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are
not counted as hardcover
OTHER
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~/OVER (indicate difference) ...............................
PREPARED BY /~,~, /~--~-~,~ DATE
3 ;L I
7~3 I
HY-LAND SURVEYING,
LAND SURVEYORS
8700 Jefferson Highway
Osseo, Minnesoto 55369
(765)493-5761
P.A.
INVOICE NO.
F.B. NO.
SCALE I"=
N
NOTE: PROPERTY CORNERS
SET BY DEVELOPERS SURVEYOR
JOHN MEYER
n.
DJ
20434- 212
40'
PARCEL "A" (19,713.66 Square Feet)
That part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 10, MOUND TERRACE, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the easterly 120.00 feet, as
measured at right angles to the East line of said Lot 3.
PARCEL "B" (14,518.04 Square Feet)
The westerly 60.00 feet of the easterly 120.00 feet of Lots 3 and
4, Block 10, MOUND TERRACE, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as measured
at right angles to the East line of said Lot 3.
LOT'S 3 & 4, BLOCK I0, MOUND TERRACE
Th~ o~ly mem~mt~ ~ho~m ere from plots of record of i~fermatlm~ prodded by client.
hereby cert fy thor this surly wos prepored by me er under
my direct supervision, end thor em o du ¥ Registered Lond
Sureey~r under the lows of the Store of Minnesotu. Signed
Surveyed by us this 30TH day of AUCUST 20 O0
REViSED=09_06-O0' REVISED=09-1.3- O0
/ /L~'
Milton E. Hytand, Iv~nn. Reg. No. 20262
HY-LAND SURVEYING
LAND SURVEYORS
8700 Jefterson Highway
OSSeO, Minneso[e 55369
(765)495-5761
INVOICE NO.
F.B. NO.
SCALE C':
N
NOTE: PROPERTY CORNERS
SI I FJY I3EV[I OPERS SURVEYOR
JOHN MEYER
~ ' I I ' Jl J ~
II ~ I , I , I
~,' ~ .9,~ -- /" - 60 ~ ~ -- -
204,)4 212
40'
PARCEL "A" t19,713.66 Square Feet)
That part of Lots 3 and 4, Block 10, MOUND TERRACE, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the eas%erly 120.O0 feet, as
measured at right angles to the East line of said Lot 3.
PARCEL "B" (14,518.04 Square Feet)
The westerly 60.00 feet of the easterly 120.00 feet of Lots 3 and
4, Block 10, MOUND TERRACE, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as measured
at right angles to the East line of said Lot 3.
LOT'S 3 & 4, BLOCK I0, MOUND TERRACE
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Land
Surveyor u~der lhe lave of the Slate of Minnesota. Signed
Surveyed by us this 501ti day of AUGUSI . 20 O0
REVISED=Og-06 O0 REVISED=09- 1,3-00
j ~ui!in h~'.! :Ii ; ;.
Milton E. Hyland, IvJf~n. Reg. No. 20262
HY-LAND SURVEYING,
LAND SURVEYORS
Proposed Top of Block
Proposed Garage Floor
Proposed Lowest Floor
Type of Building -
8700 Jefferson Highway
Osseo, Minnesota 55369
(763)493-5761
{~urv~uur~ (gertifirale
N
JOHN MEYER
NOTE: PROPERTY CORNERS
SET BY DEVELOPERS SURVEYOR
~,..o
60.00
P.A.
O
[]
xO00.O
INVOICE NO. 20434
F.B. NO.
SCALE I"= 30'
Denotes Iron Monument
Denotes Wood Hub Set
For Excavation Only
Denotes Existing Elevation
Denotes Proposed Elevation
Denotes Surface Drainage
Property located in
port of Section __,
Township __, Range __.
PARCEL
The westerly 60.00 feet of the
easterly 120.00 feet of Ix~ts 3
and 4, Block 10, MOUND TERRACE,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, as
measured at right angles to the
East line of said hot 3.
I~OUI~ID ~'[MJbN, I~ ~ It~'5t,
The only e~semeflts shou~ are ~ plats of rec~J of IflformotkJfl I~ovlded by dlmL
I h~eby c~tify that this surly was ~ by me or ufld~
my direct sup~d=i~, and that I ~ o ~ly R~ist~ Lend
Sur~ und~ the lows of the State of M~ot~.
Sur~d by us this 141H doy of SEPTEMBER , 20.,, ~
Signed
Milton E. H~ond, Minn. R~..Nb. 20262
7
ON~r
WALNUT
I
' /' . 6p
/ , . / AT [A GL'E OINT
50.2 31~ ,~.,/ t'~-'-SEWER IS I'S OF ¢
~O40
LANE
,5 4
MAF
......................................... HARD DRY CLA¥ DRY ............................................................................................................................ H
SANDY ...........................................................................................................................
......................................... CLAY ..............................................................................................................................
................................. EXISTING GROUND LINE
CITY OF MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SHEET
SURVEY ON FILE? YES / NO
LOT OF RECORD? YES I NO
YARD I DIRECTI(}N
IH)USE .........
FRONT N S E W
FRONT N S E W
SIDE N S E W
SIDE N S E W
REAR N S E W
LAKE N S E W
I'OP OF BLUFF
ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH:
~i .io,ooo/so~ 8i ?,soo/o
R1A 6,000/40 B2 20,000780
R2 6,000/40 83 10,OOO/60
R2 14,000/80
R3 SEE ORD. I1 30,000/100
REQUIRED [ EXLVI"ING/PROI~)SED
15'
50'
10' OR
EXISTING LOT SIZE:
LOT WIDTH:
LOT DEPTH:
VARIANCE
GARAGE, SIIED ..... OR OTIIER DETACIIED
FRONT N S E W
FRONT N S E W
SIDE N S E W
SIDE N S E W
REAR N S E W
LAKE N S E W
TOP OF BLUFF
BUILDINGS
4' OR 6'
4' OR 6'
4'
50'
10' OR 30'
.Planning Department at 472-0600.
0 0
0
IIARDCOVER 30% OR 40%
CONFORMING? YES / NO / ? BY: DATED:
This Zoning Information Sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound
RESOLUTION # 00-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2857 HIGHLAND BLVD.,
LOTS 74 AND 75, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 168
P & Z CASE # 00-57 AND 00-61
WHEREAS, the applicant, has submitted a request for a minor subdivision and variance
to create an additional lot from the existing parcel at 2857 Highland Blvd; and,
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-lA Zoning District that requires
a 6,000 square feet lot area, 20 feet front yard setbacks, and 10 feet side yard setbacks for non lots
of record; and,
WHEREAS, The lot has approximately 16,204 square feet of area as is currently held.
The subdivision would create an additional lot, resulting in parcel sizes of 6,489 square feet and
9,715 square feet as proposed. Lot widths and lot area for the two parcel would meet minimums
for the R-lA district; and,
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision would reclassify the proposed parcels to non-lots of
record, subjecting them to all applicable zoning provisions; and,
WHEREAS, proposed building setbacks for the newly created parcel meet zoning
setback minimums for non-lots of record; and,
WHEREAS, the subdivision would reclassify the yard setbacks of the existing Highland
Blvd. parcel, changing the rear yard setback from the west property line to the south property
line. The existing house setback is 14.4 feet requiring a 0.6 feet variance from the required 15
feet rear yard setback minimum; and,
WHEREAS, the hardcover is under 30% for the existing parcel and would also apply to
the new parcel; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended
approval of the minor subdivision and variance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota as follows:
The City does hereby grant a minor subdivision and variance of the property pursuant
to Section 330:20, Subdivision 1.B with the following conditions:
a. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan be approved by the City
Engineer prior to release of an approved resolution.
b. Provide utility and drainage easements along all new lot lines, 5 feet wide on side
lot lines, and 10 feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
c. The new sanitary sewer and water services either be installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
d. Obtain an entrance permit from Hennepin County for the new parcel.
e. Obtain a utility permit Hennepin County for connections to water and sewer
services.
f. Park dedication fee of $500 be paid at the time of building permit issuance.
This Minor Subdivision and Variance is granted for the following new legally
described property:
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution and
easements with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording.
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2000
D AFT
Those present: Chair GeoffMichael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, Bill
Voss, and Frank Weiland. Absent and excused: Commissioners Orvin Burma, Jerry
Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Council Liaison Bob Brown; Staff present: Building
Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Diana Mestad.
2.3
CASE #00-57: MINOR SUBDVISION, 2857 HIGHLAND BLVD., LEANN
HANSSEN, 3195 CASCO CIRCLE, LOTS 74 & 75, AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVSION NO. 168, PID# 23-117-24-42-0098.
The City Building Official stated that this case was a proposed lot division to allow
flexibility for siting a new home. He further stated that the driveway was not shown on
the survey. The City Building Official pointed out that Hennepin County will be
reviewing the driveway and they are very restrictive.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve the minor
subdivision as requested with the following conditions.
1. Final grading, draining and erosion control plan be approved by the City Engineer
prior to release of an approved resolution.
2. Provide utility and drainage easements along all new lot lines, 5 feet wide on side
lot lines, and 10 feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
3. The sanitary sewer and water services either are installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. Obtain an entrance permit from Hennepin County for a new parcel.
5. Obtain a utility permit from Hennepin County for connections to water and sewer
services.
6. Park dedication fee of $500 to be paid at the time of building permit issuance.
Recommendations from the City Engineer:
1. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan to be approved by the City
Engineer at time of building permit application.
2. Provide drainage and utility easements along all new lot lines, five feet wide on
side lot lines, and ten feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
3. The new sanitary sewer and water services either are installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. Entrance permit must be obtained from Hennepin County for the new driveway to
the vacant parcel. A utility permit will also be required for the new water and
sewer service connections.
D AFT
Written Comments from Commissioner Mueller:
This subdivision seems to lack complete information. The letter from our public works
official which does not indicate the location of the existing water and sewer and the
proposed water and sewer lines. This is one of the requirements of a subdivision request.
The second major item of concern is being able to safely access a driveway cut into an
extremely sloped hillside while entering/exiting a county road. I believe it is in the
planning commission's purview to address this issue. This is "a Ralph Nader" location -
"unsafe at any speed." My wife's car was totaled (while in the left mm lane) at this
intersection and close calls are the norm. The proposed driveway cut would be further up
the hill without a turn lane. Cars are speeding up to "make it up the hill" especially in
winter. Adding an exit or entrance into this roadway is not good planning. It would be
my suggestion that we get county approval with the required sight lines for safe access
for a driveway onto CR 110 before we can address drainage issues due to extensive
excavation requirements. In other words, how wide will the driveway need to be and
how does that affect drainage. Not only do we have a dangerous intersection close by,
we are dealing with three hills (CR 100, Highland, and proposed driveway) and a curve.
Not good planning. My recommendation would be to table this item until the county
makes its recommendation regarding the driveway.
The applicant stated that she had talked with the County about the driveway. The City
Building Official stated that Staffis on top of the driveway issues.
The City Building Official stated there needed to be a correction made to the City
Planner's report. The house would need a variance for the house setback (side yard) and
Staff is in favor of this as it would be less than a one-foot variance.
Weiland questioned whether a subdivision could be voted on when a variance was
created. The City Building Official stated that usually it could not, but that this was a
code technicality. The side yards are 10 feet, but after the division would become the
rear yard.
Voss confirmed with the applicant that she had received a copy of Commissioner
Mueller's comments and she confirmed that she had.
Voss asked whether a case had been denied prior to County approval in the past. The
City Building Official stated this was a condition of Staff's recommendation and that it is
a generic requirement to get an entrance permit.
Voss pointed out that Staff may require this, but the Planning Commission had not
required it in the past. The City Building Official stated that Staff was recommending
approval even with Mueller's concerns. He further stated that the applicant could be
required to resolve this issue with Staff prior to the City Council meeting.
MOTION, by Voss, seconded by Weiland to accept Staff's recommendation
including the City Engineer's recommendations and additionally a provision
D AFT
allowing a variance to the rear yard setback granted to the existing home of
6/10 of a foot.
Hasse stated that he recommended the applicant put a turnaround in the driveway. The
applicant stated that a turnaround was planned.
Chair Michael called the question.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Motion carried. 5-0.
The applicant asked for clarification on whether the grading, etc., needed to be completed
before the City Council meeting on October 24. The City Building Official stated this
was encouraged, but not required. He further stated that the applicant needed to fill out
the variance application.
~)
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Transportation Department- *
1600 Prairie Ddve - Medina, MN 55340-5421
4479'
Field inspected by
Location ~110
DRIVEWAY OR STREET ENTRANCE PERMIT AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Dave Zetterstroa Date
100° t~. Of Htghland Speedzone 30 A.D.T.
10/10/00
485O
Nearest Cross Street (if rural)
Sight distance: Actual - Left 3504'
Minimum- Left 350
Curb to be removed to: CI Construction Joint
Recommended drainage: I~ Surface
[] Sawed Joint
[] Culvert Culvert length
260+
Right
Right ~60
Culvert diameter
1. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (Within Right-of-Way)
BASE SURFACE CURI~
Type CL 5 [qUaY Type Z341 BIT Type
Depth 4" J~'~ll Depth 2u Hill Design
SIDEWALK SHOULDER
Type Type
Depth Depth
BLVD - DITC~
Topsoil
Depth
+ seed or sod
2. TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS Plate #Z or #3 as needed
3. SPECIAL PROVISIONS ~ '
One 12' mtntmum, 20° maximum wtdth private drtve~ay permitted &ssketched,* ApprOach '
to have 5' flares and profile slmtlar to Dtagram 'A' type 'a' below. Bituminous curb
to be trlraaed and driveway butt-Jointed to back of curb. Boulevard dralnage to be
kept from roadway.
DO NOT PLACE CONCRETE ON COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT WRITTEN
PERMISSION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, CALL (612) 745-7643.
I Diagram A I
IMPORTANT: TYPE 'a" CONSTRUCT ROUNDED BERM TO IMPORTANT:
R/VV CIL
PREVENT WATER FROM RUNNING DOWN
DRIVE.
Diagram B I
CONSTRUCT SWALE TO DIVERT WATER FROM
SHOULDER. R/W
2"GuRer I [ 6"Swale ] '
. .. , , ..~..~. . ~ , . .,,~.. · ,..... [~....~:.;.::,..,..~.~ -
.*.:' ..'~;' . :' . . . ,,...~.:.:.....
Shoulder Shoulder ~
Plea ~lve~ in exi~ing ditch
Final inspection date
Driveway was found to be
Inspected by
APPROVED/D61~aI~.
[] Satis~cto~ HENNEPIN COUNTY
Transportation Dept.
[] Unsatisfacto~ ,-~ ',-'- ~? '
By / ~: '
PLANNING REPORT
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
Illlr4
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP
DATE: October 9, 2000
SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision
OWNER: Leann Hanssen
CASE NUMBER: 00-57
I-IKG FILE NUMBER: 00-5
LOCATION: 2857 Highland Boulevard
ZONING: Residential District R-lA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The applicant has submitted a request for a minor subdivision
to create an additional lot from an existing lot of record. The lot has approximately 16,204 square
feet of area as is currently held. The new lot will be subdivided from the 'rear' of the existing
home which fronts on Highland Blvd. Access to the new lot would come from Bartlett Blvd.,
County Road 110.
The proposed lot division indicates the new parcel will have a lot width of 75 feet at the right-of-
way. Lot area is 7,475 which exceeds the 6,000 square feet R-lA district minimum. A buildable
area of 65 feet by 70 feet should allow enough area and flexibility for a new home to be sited on
the site. The initial grade from Bartlett is steep but levels out at the front setback line. A
driveway will need to be cut through the slope which is about 50% over that 20 feet area. Typical
driveway grades should not exceed 8 to 10 percent. This will be reviewed during the grading and
drainage plan stage. Associated with the driveway will be a permit from Hennepin County that
the applicant will need to secure.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council
approve the minor subdivision as requested with the following conditions.
1. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan be approved by the City Engineer
prior to release of an approved resolution.
2. Provide utility and drainage easements along all new lot lines, 5 feet wide on side
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
p. 2
g00-57 Minor Subdivision - 2857 High land Blvd.
October 9, 2000
lot lines, and 10 feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
3. The new sanitary sewer and water services either be installed or some type of
financial guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. Obtain an entrance permit from Hennepin County for the new parcel.
5. Obtain a utility permit Hermepin County for connections to water and sewer
services.
6. Park dedication fee of $500 be paid at the time of building permit issuance.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
I I
Engineering * Planning , Surveying
FRA
ME M 0 R A ND UM
DATE:
September 29, 2000
TO:
Jon Sutherland, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
John Cameron, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Minor Subdivision - Hanssen Property
2857 Highland Boulevard
Case No. 00-57
MFRA #13041
Comments
The survey submitted with the application does not show a proposed house location or any
proposed grading. The building area of the vacant parcel being created by the subdivision is 10
to 12 feet above the curb line on Bartlett Boulevard (County Road 110). This will not be an easy
site to design a home for, unless a tuck under is used. A very complete grading, drainage and
erosion control plan will be required when application is made for a building permit.
This is another one of the older plats in the City, which did not provide drainage easements along
lot lines; therefore drainage and utility easements will need to be provided along ail new lot
lines.
o
There are no in-place utility services provided for the new vacate parcel. They will need to be
installed from the City's watermain and sewer main in County Road 110. This work will require
a utility permit from Hennepin County.
4. A new entrance to Bartlett Boulevard is required to provide access to the vacant parcel created
by the subdivision. This will require an entrance permit from Hennepin County.
15050 23ra,4venue North · Plymouth. Minnesota · 55447'
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mail: mfra~mfra, com
Jon Sutherland, Planning and Zoning
September 28, 2000
Page 2
Since the new parcel fronts a county road, there would not be any deferred street assessments;
however, the City records should be checked for deficient sanitary sewer or watermain unit
charges.
Recommendations
(~ Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan to be approved by the City Engineer at time of
building permit application.
2. Provide drainage and utility easements along all new lot lines, five feet wide on side lot lines,
and ten feet in width along the front and rear lot lines.
3. The new sanitary sewer and water services either be installed or some type of financial guarantee
be provided, such as cash escrow or performance bond.
4. Entrance permit must be obtained from Hennepin County for the new driveway to the vacant
parcel. A utility permit will also be required for the new water and sewer service connections.
cc: Loren Gordon, Hoisington Koegler Group
s:\main:Wlou 13041 :\CorrespondeneXsutherland9-28
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS -2857 HIGHLAND BLVD SUBDIVISION
Watermain on Bartlett Blvd (Co Rd 110) is South of 6" CIP Forcemain. There is
no water sevice to Lot 75 from Bartlett Bird or Highland Blvd. Sewer is north of
6" CIP Forcemain on Bartlett Blvd. There is a sewer service for Lot 75 on
Highland Blvd. Proposed water and sewer service locations are not shown on
the survey.
GREG SKINNER 9/15/00
RECEIVEP
City Council Date~c/~ C~/
Distribution:
Ci~ Planner
Public Works
~ ,':~2 C,~ Engineer
Application for
MINOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND
City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN
Phone: 472-0607, Fax: 472-0620
Parks
Other
Case No. .
Application Fee: $75.00
Escrow Deposit: $1.000
Deficient Unit Charges?
Delinquent Taxes?
VARIANCE REQUIRED?
Please type or print the following information:
PROPERTY Subject Address
INFORMATION
EXISTING Lot ~/ ~
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION Subdivision ~
ZONING
DISTRICT Circle: R-1 -2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
APPLICANT The applicant is: ..-~..~_owner
Name ../~"c~, ~I,'~
Address
Phone (H)
OWNER Name
(if other than
applicant) Address
other:
¥/.d':.: : '
(M)
Phone (H) (W) (M)
Name
SURVEYO~
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( )
no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
This application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or an explanation given why this is not the case.
Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature
Revised 07-13-00
Revised 07-13-00
Date
Date
CITY OF MOUND
HARDCDVER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
)PERTY ADDRESS:
OWNER'S NAME:
LOT AREA ~?~-?
LOT AREA
LOT AREA
SQ. FT. X 30%
SQ. FT. X 40%
SQ. FT. X 15%
= (for all lots) ..............
= (for Lots of Record*) .......
= (for detached buildings only)
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225,Subd. 6. B. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official.
HOUSE
LENGTH WIDTH SO FT
/-/~ x ~ = //
X =
X =
)ETACHED BLDGS
(GARAGE/SHED)
TOTAL HOUSE .........................
X =
X =
TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS .................
X =
X =
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ..................
X :
X =
X =
TOTAL DECK ..........................
X =
X -
TOTAL OTHER .........................
DRIVEWAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
DECKS Open decks (1/4" min.
opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are
not counted as hardcover
OTHER
i~OTAL HARDCOVER ! IMPERVIOUS SURFACE I
I~UND~ER OVER (indicate~difference, ............................... !
,..-"' t MINNESO/TA SAP IST I,AME ASSEMBLY"
/~. / / / / / / - _
~,.~,~N I ! / . /' ~ ,' / / .
/ ,; y: / /-../
~X,ST. 6, /.. /DN ~I~E [~ET. : · ~ r~N ~ GL ENWOOD
~ -- ~ W~TER MAIN / i ~ ,..~
~ ~- ~ "1 ~ / ~ J ' ,, ' ~'
' / ~ ; - -6"x$"X6 ~EES ,,
~ ...... C. ..... ,'~: I / .... l ..... J.,~_ ~oJ ~,o~I~.~B33 , -I z_4 Im,~ ' --
¢ ~ I CORe
75/ 74 1' 73 ,' 72 ;
. ,. . ..
/ / / /,~: ......... ~ _
k..., ~ 40 OJ ENWOOD
/~U2 SUB ~,* 109 DRIVE
I ................ [ s,,~ ....... q.,~so ~'r ....... t ................. l..~.!..¢, l.-i~ I ........ A.'-~I'E ........................... 7
.................... ~ .... ~ .... ~ ............. , ...........................
..: .::::: ~.,.,, ............ , ............... ~..l..~.. ~. ~.~..I ~. ~ ..............
......................... ;;;;::' [[;;;::.....;; ........... ; ................... ;; ................. . ......................
................................ ~' 't ........................... : :::::::::::::::::::::: :::: ;..~ ............................................. :::..::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
qq~ :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::': ;:; :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............................ ~ .....! <--. <¢ ......................................................... ~'1 .................. f" ....................................
............................ ~,~ i .....
............................. I'F ........ : .................................................. ~ ...... ............. ~~:.:
.......................... ~ I ................................................................ ~ ~'"'~ ...................................... 9~.,:6 .......... ~::: ........
...................... ~" .................... ~ .............. :"": ::: ! ? ~: ::::: : :: ::: ::"::::~:.:::: ....
......................................... ~ ........... [ ::: ':.::: ...... : ...... ~ ................................. / ............................................................... : ....
980 .......................... ~ ~ ............................... ~ .................... ; ....... ~""' ~"-~::::;;: ........................... ' .....................
........... '..::::":'~ :~::'::::: ...: ..................... i .............. ~::::::::' ::::::::'::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............. a.i ........................................ ; ...........
................ ~ ............................... ~ ..........
................... ~...¢ .................................... ~:i..:'.:' ........................................................ _.-, .......... ~a .b~ .....
................. . .... .:.: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~:_~ :/.: Z:
................ ~ .Z ................ ~.: ::-~.'.. .............................
_gzo ': :': "::'::::::8_:::::::::::::::::::::1 ~=======================================================_.:~ _..~ ::::::::::: :::::::::'~o:~~ .............................................. _
............... ~ ..... i ~ ............ I. -~ '~','*'"= ~'"~tr?--e O;'4 % ......................................................
................. Z ....~../ ............. I .... N I~,~L ~,...,x..~ .......................... ~ .........................................
.............. ~ .......~ ......................................... 1'~ .......................... ~ ............................................
....................... ::'. :..'"'::.'9.?:.5 ::::.'"
~60 .................. 5 .....................................................................
~::':~ :::::::::::::::::::::: '/;:::::::: :::::: ¢.:8.: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............ ~8...6 ..........
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ( ...................................................... ~ ............................................ ~ -~¢.~..~ ..........................................
............................................................ ' .......... :' .............................................................................. ¢ ........................................... m m'"m ......................................
................................. ====================================== ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ....... % ........................................... ~.>..> .......................... .......................
....................................................................................... ~ ~"~ ..........................................
950 .............................................................................................................................................. z. .............................................................................
,. 0 I 2 5 4 5
PROPOSED LOT DIVISION FOR
LEANN HANSSEN
IN LOTS 68, 74 &: 75, AUD. SUB. NO. 168
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
.... /s, RO
BAR~LE~ -- -
· . ~ -.~ . -. , ~,,.
_._ r=~ ~ ~o~ .._~ .'~':: .......
: N 89'58'00" E 160.3~
- f(.EIVEI
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0607, Fax: 472-0620
PAID
o-1
O ,T 1 0 000
Applicat~F~u[: MC~ ~. O0
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
Planning Commission Date:
City Council Date:
Distribution:
Case No.
'O/,I/f)'~ City Planner ~ cO/I ,/Z)i) DNR
,c, ~/,),~/~ ~) Ci~ Engineer lO ~, ~0~ PARK
Other
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
LEGAL
DESC.
PROPERTY
OWNER
Address ~
Block
Subdivision
ZONING DISTRICT R-1
Name
Address .""~[.~ ~-'
Phone ~--~ [~ ~5 ~ (._.~'~
(H) (W)
R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
(M)
APPLICANT Name
(IF OTHER Address
THAN Phone
OWNER) (H)
(W) (M)
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and
provide copies of resolutions.
Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Variance Application, P. 2
Do the existing structures co,mp~ly with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district
in which it is located? Yes,~_, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for
variance request, i.e. setbat~k,'lqt area, etc.):
o
SETBACKS:
REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE
(or existing)
Front Yard: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Rear Yard: ( Nt~E W )
Lakeside: ( N'~ E W )
: (NSEW)
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover:
ft. ff. ff.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ff. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. fl.
ft. ft. ft.
ff. ft. ft.
sq ft sq ft sq ft
sq ft sq ft sq ft
Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes,~), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: -%
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses
permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation
( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe:
Revised 07-11-00
Variance Application, P. 3 Case No,
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain:
Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes (), No (). If yes, explain:
Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in
this petition? Yes (), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining
and removing such notices as may be required by law.
Owner's Signatur ~:~-~-c__--~ :~..~-~..~ Date
Applicant's Signat~, ~~--~*-~. ~ ~.,_..~ ~ ~./ /,~...~.~_~~ Date
( ~ ! ,.,l~evised 07-11-00
SURVEY ON FILE?
Lit ~[ UP MUUDIJ~
LOT OF RECORD'?, YES I
YARJ~
ItOUSE .........
FRONT
FRONT
SIDE
SIDE
REAR
LAKE
TOP OF BLUFF
NO
DIRECTION
N S E W
N S E W
N S E W
N S E W
N S E W
N S E W
INt'UkMAIII, JN SIIEEI
ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH:
R1 10,000/60 B! 7,500/0
R1A,f 6,000/40'~'%,B2 20,000/80
~"~2 ~,ooo/,u ~ ~o,ooo/~o
R2 14,000/80
R3 SEE ORD. I1 30,000/100
REQUIRF..D ] EXISTING/PROPOSED
15'
50'
10' OR 30'
EXISTING LOT SIZE:
LOT WID'I'H:
LOT DEPTH:
VARIANCE
GARAGE, SHED ..... DETACHED BUILDINGS
FRONT N S E W
FRONT N S E W
SIDE N S E W
SIDE N S E W
REAR N S E W
ILAKE N S E W
I'OP OF BLUFF
4' OR 6'
4' OR 6'
4'
50'
10' OR 30'
HARDCOVER 30% OR 40%
Com.'ORg, NC;? YES / NO / ? I~y: ]DATED:
This Zoning Infix.nation Sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements ou0ined ill die City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound
Planning DeparOnem at 472-0600.
4~
O
O
O0
October 24, 2000
RESOLUTION NO. 00-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT WATER & SEWER
ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $79,726.78 TO BE
CF, RTl. FlED TO THeE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST
LEVY//14936
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has
met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following
improvements, to-wit:
DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER
NOW, TItEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mound:
Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made
a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby
found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows:
PID//
AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY
SEE LIST
D~I~. SEWER &
WATER 1 8 % 14936
o
Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days
(November 10, 2000) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll.
Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall.
Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section
370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00
increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be
accepted.
If the assessment is not paid on or before November 10, 2000 the amount will be
spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest
for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2000, and all of 2001 ).
Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter
shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3.
The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the
required time period is eight percent (8%).
e
October 24, 2000
The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
2
PROPERTY
IDENTIFICATION #
12-117-24-43-0038
13-117-24-12-0128
13-117-24-24-0014
13-117-24 12 0042
12-117-24-43-0001
13-117-24 12 0009
13-117-24 12-0014
13-117-24-11-0061
13-117-24-12-0231
13-117-24-14-0037
13-117-24-12-0097
13-117-24-11-0003
18-117-23 23 0004
18-117-23 23 0012
18-117-23-23-0034
13-117-24-11-0122
13-117-24-12-0075
13-117-24-12-0072
14-117-24 42 0082
14-117-24-42-0010
14-117-24-14-0043
14-117-24-13-0004
14-117-24 42 0110
14-117-24-42-0077
14-117-24-42-0016
14-117-24 42 0028
14-117-24 42 0042
14-117-24-31-0020
14-117-24 31 0031
14-117-24 32 0032
14-117-24-34-0038
14-117-24-34-0015
14-117-24 44 0031
14-117-24 42 0023
14-117-24-34-0005
13-117-24-32-0057
13-117-24-32-0066
13 - 117-24- 31-0077
13-117-24-34-0004
13-117-24 32 0116
13-117-24-32-0115
13-117-24-32-0155
13-117-24 31 0052
13-117-24-31-0068
AMOUNT
93.13
229.31
119.83
224.46
240.71
368.46
280.83
537.21
333.34
139.06
97.37
102.41
422.46
474.71
340.34
470.09
387.59
1155.08
540.34
214.96
452.83
372.21
659.22
140.78
551.84
644.96
838.47
1651.96
209.90
179.46
285.97
424.47
516.37
475.84
416.56
356.84
354.01
260.51
283.09
100.37
254.97
184.81
299.47
387.46
O~tober 24, 2000
13-117-24-43-0089
24-117-24 12 0055
13-117-24-43 0090
13-117-24-41-0048
13-117-24 41 0042
13-117-24-41-0055
13-117-24-4 1-0057
13-117-24-43-0118
13-117-24-43 0122
13-117-24-44 0095
23-117-24-13-0012
23-117-24-42-0005
22-117-24-43-0010
23-117-24-41-0021
23-117-24-44-0007
23-117-24-44-0008
23-117-24 42 0083
23-117-24 42 0020
23-117-24-31-0012
23-117-24 43 0008
23-117-24 34 0086
23-117-24 31 0041
23-117-24-34-0102
23-117-24 24 0008
23-117-24 34 0065
22-117-24-44-0005
23-117-24 23 0095
23-117-24 32 0043
23-117-24 32 0050
23-117-24 32 0063
23-117-24 13 0071
13-117-24-32 0143
13-117-24-34-0098
13-117-24-34-0098
13-117-24-34-0098
13-117-24 43 0022
24-117-24 13 0009
24-117-24 12 0020
13-117-24-43-0004
19-117-23 23 0124
19-117-23 23 0135
19-117-23 23 0082
19-117-23-24-0022
19-117-23-24-0033
19-117-23-31-0138
19-117-23 31 0027
60 .a6
6o5.21
417.84
355.74
197.77
227.81
241.13
168.99
385.74
430.03
421.59
539.64
425.72
316.32
355.72
367.72
289.37
289.28
415.71
376.99
485.34
181.00
214.12
493.21
328.22
542.41
145.31
1146.83
347.96
430.81
404.34
1506.28
313.40
130.07
372.46
192.75
272.84
1544.84
520.09
361.45
515.11
281.44
528.18
378.02
127.50
331.68
444.15
October 24, 2000
4
19-117-23-23-0064
19-117-23-23-0108
19-117-23-24-0023
19-117-23 24 0024
19-117-23 32 0033
19-117-23-32-0031
24-117-24-41-0063
24-117-24 41 0042
24-117-24 41 0087
24-11%24 41 0032
19-11%23-32-0204
19-117-23-314)096
19-11%23 31 0062
19-117-23 32 0076
19-117-23 32 0082
19-117-23 32 0086
19-117-23-32-0110
24-117-24 41 0162
19-117-23 31 0128
19-117-23 -3443063
19-117-23-34-0064
19-117-23-33 0172
19-117-23 33 0026
19-117-23-33-0020
19 - 117-23-3343051
24-117-24-43-0047
19-117-23 33 0196
19-117-23-32-0210
24-117-24-44-0022
24-117-24-44-0021
19-117-23 34 0044
19 - 117-23 -34 -0049
19-117-23 33 0010
19-117-23 33 0235
19-117-23 33 0129
24-117-24-44-0041
24-117-24 44 0187
24-117-24 44 0035
24-117-24 44 0061
24-117-24-44-0 176
24-117-24-44-0111
24-117-24 44 0182
24-117-24 44 0188
24-117-24 44 0073
24-117-24-44-0211
24-117-24-44-0027
24-117-24 41 0160
1567.59
1567.71
201.81
557.59
531.78
274.84
346.94
384.53
564.64
536.15
1638.21
605.46
576.15
519.08
398.77
191.51
329.90
496.93
556.71
347.09
1900.96
372.15
134.43
136.72
465.97
421.52
299.05
632.93
131.19
422.78
609.52
269.86
466.02
385.64
726.27
901.84
337.15
789.31
495.80
358.78
1639.97
575.03
353.02
453.65
273.18
555.53
159.06
October 24, 2000
5
:24-117-24-41-0017
24-117-24-41-0100
24-117-24-41-0168
24-117-24 41 0070
24-117-24 41 0084
24-117-24-41-0102
24-117-24 42 0007
24-117-24 44 0166
24-117-24-43-0015
25-117-24 12-0125
25-117-24-12-0113
25-117-24 21 0035
19-117-23-33-0033
30-117-23 22 0034
30-117-23 22 0036
25-117-24-12-0200
25-117-24-11-0070
30-117-23-21-0001
30-117-23 21 0007
25-117-24 11 0035
25-117-24 11 0115
25-117-24-12-0134
25-117-24-21 0007
25-117-24 21 0080
13-117-24 32 0091
13-117-24 32 0094
14-117-24-44-0038
13-117-24-33-0047
13-117-24 33 0057
13-117-24 33 0014
394.25
734.73
269.60
307.56
335.15
533.07
1248.59
202.14
233.31
114.60
160.44
388.13
564.52
478.53
336.64
552.65
1020.84
352.77
470.50
353.56
360.41
471.14
518.90
1552.83
1706.58
816.37
706.26
385.40
270.95
290.99
$79,726.78
October 24, 2000
6
October 24, 2000
RESOLUTION NO. 00-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2000 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT ROLL IN ~ AMOUNT OF $1,148.01 TO BE
CERTIFIE~ TO ~ COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST
LEVY//14937
WltEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following
improvements, to-wit:
2000 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE FROM JULY 1, 1999 TO JUNE 30, 2000 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOUND:
1. Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made
a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby
found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessments shall be payable in one annual installment as follows:
INT®
LEVY // IMPROVEMENT RATE YEARS
14937 2000 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE 8%
(SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR PID NUMBERS AND AMOUNTS)
Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days
(November 10, 2000) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll.
Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall.
Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section
370). ff you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00
increments, ff the total assessment is under $300.00, no paxtial payment will be
accepted.
If the assessment is not paid on or before November 10, 2000 the amount will be
spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest
for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2000, and all of 2001 ).
Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter
shall be in accor~ce with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3.
The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the
required time period is eight percent (8%).
October 24, 2000
The Clerk shall forthwith tranmit a certified duplicate of this a~sment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
PROPERTY
IDENTIFICATION #
AMOUNT
13-117-24 33 0083
14-117-24 44 0001
14-117-24 44 0004
13-117-24 33 0004
13-117-24 33 0005
13-117-24 33 0076
13-117-24 33 0011
13-117-24 33 0014
13-117-24 33 0015
13-117-24 33 0016
13-117-24 33 0017
13-117-24 33 0077
13-117-24 33 0073
14-117-24 44 0036
14-117-24 44 0037
14-117-24 44 0038
14-117-24 44 0039
14-117-24 44 0042
13-117-24 33 0047
13-117-24 33 0082
44.17
56.26
129.00
34.51
145.31
52.08
105.11
27.39
0
0
0
0
294.30
108.83
46.65
22.72
81.68
0
43.20
TOTAL
$1,148.01
2
October 24, 2000
RESOLUTION NO. 00-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID TREE
REMOVAL CHARGES ASSESSlVl~NT
ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $394.05 TO BE
CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST
LEVY #14938
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following
improvements, to-wit:
UNPA~ HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL CHARGES
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOUND:
Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made
a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby
found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessments shall be payable in one annual installment as follows:
PID#
IMPROVEME~ AMOUNT
INT®
YEARS RATE LEVY #
13-117-24 32 0095UNPAID
TREE REMOVAL
CHARGES $ 394.05
1 8% 14938
Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days
(November 10, 2000) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll.
Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall.
Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section
370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00
increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be
If the assessment is not paid on or before November 15, 1997 the amount will be
spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest
for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 1997, and all of 1998).
Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter
shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3.
The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the
required time period is eight percent (8%).
Oetol~..r 2,I, 2000
The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
2
October 2#, 2000
RESOL~ON NO. 00-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAII~ DRIVEWAY APRON
REPLACEMENT CHARGES ASSESSMENT
ROLL IN ~ AMOUNT OF $288.00 TO BE
CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST
LEVY #14939
WiClEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following
improvements, to-wit:
UNPAID DRIVEWAY APRON REPLACEME~ CHARGES
NOW, TF[EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~
CITY OF MOUND:
Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made
a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby
found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessments shall be payable in one annual installment as follows:
PID#
IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT
INTe
YEARS RATE LEVY #
23-117-24 32 0040
UNPAID DRIVEWAY
APRON REPLACEMENT
CHARGES $ 288.00
1 8% 14939
Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days
(November 10, 2000) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll.
Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall.
e
Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section
370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00
increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be
If the assessment is not paid on or before November 10, 2000 the amount will be
spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest
for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2000, and all of 2001 ).
o
October 24, 2000
Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter
shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3.
The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the
required time period is eight percent (8%).
The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
Carol Weber
5246 Michaele Lane
Minnetonka, MN 55345
(612) 470-0629
PROJECT FOR A
r°baccoFree
~I~ f U T U R
To:
From:
Kandis Hanson
Jim Fackler ....
Carol Webe~5~
Mound Tobacco Free Future for Youth
Date:
Subject:
October 19, 2000
Draft Clean Out Air Resolution
Enclosed you will find a copy of a revised draft of the clean outdoor air resolution for the
city council packets. I have made the changes requested by the Park and Open Space
Advisory Commission during their meeting on October 12th. It is my understanding that
the Mound Tobacco Free Future for Youth group will be discussing this draft with the
Mound City Council on October 24th.
If you have any questions, comments or concerns, please feel free to call me at 470-0629.
Thank you very much for you assistance.
Project Tobacco Free Future, University of Minnesota
DRAFT--October, 2000
City of Mound
A RESOLUTION PROMOTING TOBACCO FREE PUBLIC PARKS, PUBLIC
PLAYGROUNDS AND PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN THE CITY OF
MOUND, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the City Council of Mound recognizes that smoking and tobacco use is
the greatest cause of cancer in the United States; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency (1993) has designated environmental
tobacco smoke as a Class A carcinogen, for which there are no known safe levels of
exposure; and
WHEREAS, tobacco contains nicotine which is an addictive and dangerous substance;
and
WHEREAS, most tobacco users become addicted before the age of nineteen; and
WHEREAS, most youth who use tobacco obtain their tobacco from social sources; and
WHEREAS, public use of tobacco provides greater opportunity for the social exchange
of tobacco to youth; and
WHEREAS, public display of tobacco use results in role modeling behavior and
reinforces the norm that tobacco use is acceptable; and
WHEREAS, role modeled behaviors significantly impact children and adolescents'
behavior choices,
WHEREAS, the City Council of Mound finds it is essential to promote tobacco free
public parks, public playgrounds and public recreational facilities in order to
encourage healthy choices for youth, to improve the health of all citizens and visitors,
and to increase the aesthetic value of our community.
DRAFT~ctober, 2000
Now, therefore be it resolved:
SECTION 1. Smoking and other uses of tobacco products are hereby strongly
discouraged at public parks, public playgrounds and public recreational facilities in the
City of Mound.
SECTION 2. The Parks Department is hereby directed to cause conspicuous
signs (e.g. ~'Thank you for not using tobacco products in this park"), to be erected on
public parks, public playgrounds and public recreational facilities and make available
to the public the adopted policy in its entirety.
SECTION 3. Definitions: The following words and terms shall have the following
meanings:
(A)
"Public Parks in the City of Mound" shall mean any outdoor venue of
recreation and/or nature setting and all buildings, structures, and
vehicles contained or utilized within the said area, which is owned
and/or operated by or within the City of Mound.
(B)
"Public Playgrounds" shall mean an area within a public park dedicated
to the recreational play of children including, but not limited to, the
equipment area and associated benches.
(C)
"Recreational facilities in the City of Mound" shall mean any athletic or
recreational facility including, but not limited to, any playing field, ball
field, bleachers, basketball court, tennis court, soccer field, playground,
swimming pools, skating rink or park, outdoor music/theater venue,
concession stand, or outdoor festival, which is operated by the City of
Mound.
(D)
"Smoking" means inhaling, exhaling, burning or carrying any lighted
cigar, cigarette, pipe, bidi or other combustible substance in any manner
or in any form.
(E)
"Tobacco Use" means to smoke (including cigarettes, cigars, pipes),
chew, snuff or otherwise use any tobacco, tobacco product or tobacco
related device.
SECTION 4. The City Council of Mound shall forward a copy of this resolution
to the City of Mound's Athletic/Civic/Private Organizations.
CITY OF MOUND
STAFF REPORT
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 5536z~-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
DATE:
MEETING
DATES:
TO:
FROM:
October 17, 2000
October 19, Dock and Commons Commission (D&C)
October 24, City Council
Dock and Commons Commission and Applicant
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
APPLICANT: Lori and Jerry Marek 4829 Island View Drive
LOCATION:
SUBJECT:
DOCK SITE # 43180 DEVON COMMONS
PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION TO INSTALL RIP RAP ON THE
COMMONS LAKESHORE
Background: The applicants are seeking a Public Lands Permit as described in the
attached application to install Rip Rap on the Commons lakeshore. The applicant's are
also requesting the City's financial assistance. Normally the City would undertake the
work, however on the Cities own schedule and at the direction of the Parks Director. The
City Council will respond to the financial aspect of the request.
Comments and Recommendation: The City is also reviewing the case for a sprinkler
system that was submitted in September which has been recommended for approval by
staff and the Dock Commission (DC).
Staff recommends approval of the request for the Rip Rap with the condition as listed
below.
1)
The Contractor must secure a Rip Rap Permit with Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District (MCWD), with the coordination of the Parks Director. After the Rip Rap is
completed, the contractor/applicant shall schedule a final inspection with the MCWD
and the Parks Director to approve the work.
Js/rkj
printed on recycled paper
18/89t2888
89:37
612484205~ CHIROSERVI~S
PUBJ.IC ~ ANn P~Mrr A~PLICATInN
CITY OF MO ~t.rklD, ~¢1 l~l ~ Mound. M2q
Prone: ,t724~,~), Fix: ~,~
55364
PAGE 82
~ITIIRUTiON:
~_S~n~O OFFICIAL
PARI~ D~OR
~MCWD
~b0pUBLIC WORKS
CONSTRUCTION ON FUBLIC 1AND PKR,'~. ~ a=,m,~.o~ N~r~: ~ ~rr SHAL~
s~ ~va~> FO~ CONSTlttCrtON O~ ~OA? ~fOOS~ OR OTH~ lJtm~q~ tm ~r~Uc LA~ coy c0~
320. hb,t. 3}.
Applicant.
Abutting
Pro~er~v
LIgal
Description
Public
Proper=y
Co~=Ta¢=or
(work)
Type
/
_/
VALUATION/PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (nqct.u~n~ ~o~. ~4nr~al.s~:'~ Z ~ ~- ~
Si~ of ~ll Dzte
LOIOBt2000 89:37
C..J
PROPOSAL
------- CONCEPT LANDSCAPING
'"'"' .3153 Priest Lane
"''' Mound, Minnesota 55364
'" (612) 472-4118
PROP~MITTED TO ~~ PNOI~
CITY. STATE e~1(3 ZiP COOE
dOB LOCATrON
ARCH=TECT ] ~)ATE O~ PLAN-~ I JOS PHONE
We hereby submit speciiicatlon~ and eallmates t~:
In. Ft. 6' to 24' Reldetone Boulder
Inst=ll t4 O
Rip RAp - F,,ll comDIiment includee H.D. filtration barrier fabric,
.~60I-R filter rock, -nd class 4 boulders
Pages
_ P.rmltting: R-naing. nrewin~ and proceuim~
In.tnll
la.Ft. 1~" Mn. River Rock =nd ed~inE
We Propose hereby to furnish material and labor ~ complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
30% ~lo~-, R-I-nc- ~i-y of ¢ompl-tion
All material is 9u~rantaed to be u ~peeifled, Ail ~k to ~ c~ in a ~nlikl
emro ~ls ~1 ~ execu~d ~ly ~ ~Ren om. ~ ~11 ~e an e~ta
rgb over and above w~ batiste, ~ egre~n~ c~ d~ s~es, a~l~n~ or
workers are ~u~f cover~ ~y W~n'~ ~1~ ~r~.
Note: This proposal may
withOraw~ by u~ if not accep~d wl~Jtn _ .
unanimously.
..... ,j ........... ,,, t~,~; ~LUU~I' illeel, lll~. lillotlOll carried
4. PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT: DOCK SITE 43180 DEVON COMMONS
Lori and Jerry Marek
4829 Island View Drive DRAFT
Park Director Fackler summarized the request for a sprinkling supply pipe across the
commons. Staff recommends approval.
Motion made by Ahrens, seconded by Goldberg, to recommend approval of
the application. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY OF MOUND
STAFF REPORT
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
DATE:
September 11,2000
MEETING
DATES:
September 21, Dock and Commons Commission (D&C)
October 24, City Council
TO:
FROM:
Dock and Commons Commission and Applicant
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
APPLICANT: Lori and Jerry Marek 4829 Island View Drive
LOCATION: DOCK SITE # 43180 DEVON COMMONS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION TO INSTALL A SPRINKLING
SUPPLY PIPE ACROSS THE COMMONS
Background: The applicants are seeking a Public Lands Permit as described in the
attached application. The applicant's request for a sprinkler is similar to numerous other
requests that have been approved in the past.
Comments and Recommendation: When reviewing new permit requests, it has been the
policy of the city to observe other issues. The existing stairway to the dock has four risers
and four risers is the breakpoint where a handrail is required by the building code.
Staff recommends approval of the request for the sprinkler system and that a handrail be
installed on one side of the stair with the condition as listed below.
1) After the work is completed the applicant shall schedule a final inspection with the
Building Official to approve the work.
Js/rkj
prmted on recycled paper
CITY OF MOUND
INSPr~TION NOTICE
M [y W TH F
I-
ADDRESS ~-~~ t V ~
.
CONT~ACTO~ PHONE#
D FOOTING D PLUMBING ROUGH-IN ~ITE INSPECTION
~ I~M~T%N. - ~ ~~AFLNAL
D WALLBOARD D FIREP~CE AT~ROAT
D PROGRESS D FIREP~CE FINAL
~ ~,N,~ ~ O~MO~,T,ON (
E~wo.K S~,S.~CTO.Y: P.OCEE~ ~ P.OTO ~E.
~ COR.EC~ WO.K ~ P.OCEED
D CO..~C~ WO.K. C~LL ~0..E~.SP~C~ON ~FO.E COVE.~NS
~ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. INSPECTOR WILL RETURN
~ STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR
~ INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance.
Owner/ContractOrlnspector on sit~Roed,M
~ / 472-0600
City of Mound, 5341 Ma ound, Minnesota 55364
Yellow Copy/Site Notice White Copy/Inspector's File
PUBLIC LAND PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF MOUND, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
55364
DISTRIBUTION:
.:'; BUILDING OFFICIAL
PARKS DIRECTOR
DNR
MCWD
,'.. PUBLIC WORKS
DOCK MEETING DATE
CITY COUNCIL DATE
CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT - ~w coostmc~on. NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL
BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (City Code
Section 320, Subd. 1).
PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT - to allow repairs to an existing structure (City Code Section
320, Sub& 3).
CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition
(City Code Section 320, SuM. 3).
[__ [ LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc. (City Code Section 320,
Subd. 4).
The structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned lands. Structures like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc.
are ali NONCONFORMING USES. It- is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance which means that those
structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are granted for a limited time and
are non-transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a new
[permit is applied for due to change in dock site holder. "
Applicant
Abuttin9
ProDertv
Legal
Description
Public
Name /_ r? r ,
Address
Phone (home)
Address
Owner
Lot
Subd.
Name
Property
Dock Site #
Contractor Name
(work)
Block
Shoreline Type
Address
Phone
VALUATION/PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR a MATERIALS):
DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE:-~c t9 ~c~¢L ~ ~oc/~(~c ~St~r'~
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
LORI AND dERRY MAREK
OF LOT 8, BLOCK 1'5, DEVON
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
"" "~:. 4,¢%" .....
·(,m,,.~...~? ~, ¥_. .,.,,., ... .,. ., ., o ,, ,,_ .,. .....
; ' ¢ '/'~";?"~ :-:'°-,' '
' ~ ~.,. ~
("/,¢,.r.~ f EXISTINO :
~o i GARAGE ~ ~ :
; TO REMAIN,~ ~ -: EXISTING
Z /'o ;
..:; - ,: .
:-.."'.-'~. ,~o ........ ', ~ ~j . ,
' : :PROPOSED
~ ~ i .~, · . . : ,
o. -, ~.°"" = m
' ' ' " ; HOUSE'
:~ f'~'¢'."--' _×,:o-,,.,0- .~,,-., ;
g ~ "* _.,, .............
· ' · ~i 0
· HOUSE :, ~,.,~o00,~.','~,*'"~.'"^"'
, Z.,o. c~ i ...... ; "
~-~'-" .,: I'..-...'
""- ~0" '~
(~.z~....,)..,...'"'.S 81050' ~ .
DEVON CO
t ,
92.9.4 coNTOUR LiNE
..LAKE
SURVEYON FII..F? YI~.S~ ! NO
IK)T Ol: RECORI)? YES / NO
YARD [
CiI'Y ()F MOUND
I)IRE('TI()N [
IIOUSE .........
FRONF N S E W
I:RONT N S E W
SIDE N S I.: W
SIDE N S F. W
RE^R N S E W
I AKI! N S E W
TOP 0[: RI.UFF
ZONING INFORMATION SIIEET
ZONING DISI'RICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH:
Ri 10,000/60 B1 7,500/0
~,ooo/4o.~)~2 ~o,ooo/~o
~16o67~o u~ lo.ooo/so
R2 14,000/80
R3 SEE ORD. si 30o000/i00
REQI;IREI) [ EXISTING/PROPOSED
15'
50'
(IR 30'
EXISTING LOT SIZE:
LOT WID'IH:
LOT DEPTti:
VARIANCE
GARA{;E, SIIED ..... I)IiTACIII{I) IH}II IHN(;S
FRONF N S I; W
FRONI' N S F. W
SIDE N S F. W
SIDE N S E W
4' ¢)R 6'
4' OR6'
REAR N S F W 4'
I.AKF.
I'¢lp 1)1: BI ,UFF
50'
I O' {)R .t0'
II,~.RI)f'f)VER
('()NFORKIIN(;" YES / NO / ?
l'lsi~ Zonm}~ ]nl,~lmalion Y, hce{ only- summarizes
Pialltting l)epaltlltCB{ at 477.{16f'wI
E Ua ~ O
~ I O ~r
< ~ N
0 ~ ~- (DO
0
30% OR 40%
It'Y: _ IDATEI):
ol thc tequirelnenls oullined in the Cily of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For furfller information, contact Ihe Cit~ of Mound
....
I~ I
. ~.p.x .~ ,~. ~.~:, ~ ~ ~ ,- ~ $o~ ~,og' "6'7
(~x < ..... : ~' ' ' ' ~ '" ~ ......... ~" ~ ......................
< ~ ,~ ~ .~, ,~, . .- ,~.~: ....... ~%~~ ~,~
1'~ ~,.I .~',e~
unanimously.
PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT:
Lori and Jerry Marek
4829 Island View Drive
DOCK SITE 43180 DEVON COMMONS
Park Director Fackler summarized the request for a sprinkling supply pipe across the
commons. Staff recommends approval.
Motion made by Ahrens, seconded by Goldberg, to recommend approval of
the application. Motion carried unanimously.
CITY OF MOUND
STAFF REPORT
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
DATE:
October 17, 2000
MEETING
DATES:
October 19, Dock and Commons Commission (D&C)
October 24, City Council
TO:
FROM:
Dock and Commons Commission and Applicant
Jon Suthedand, Building Official '~'~' ~ -
APPLICANT: Fred Johnson, 4925 Island View Drive
LOCATION: DOCK SITE # 43942 DEVON COMMONS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC LANDS PERMITAPPLICATION TO RESTORE LANDSCAPING ON
THE CITY FIRE LANE AND THE COMMONS.
Background: We hope the Commission and the Council will forgive the short notice of
this report, staff has expedited this case due to the need to re-establish turf and replant
trees (if required), this season.
The applicants are seeking an 'after the fact' Public Lands Permit in order to repair
damage done to the City Fire Lane and Commons due to the construction of a new home.
The grading work also removed a portion of the sod from the neighbor to the east and 1
have requested the sod be replaced to the neighbors satisfaction. A landscaping plan is
in progress and was not available at the time of this report. I have directed the applicant
to install sod immediately on the exposed areas of the Fire Lane. I have requested the
applicant re-stake and identify the property line adjacent to the Commons and Fire Lane
so I may further evaluate the trees that have been cut.
The grading and cutting of trees without Council approval, is a violation of City Code 320
and is a misdemeanor. In addition, the tree removal could be determined a violation of the
Shoreland Management Ordinance (SMO). The SMO ordinance allows tree removal in
order to provide views to the lake, provided screening of structures as viewed from the
water (assuming summer leaf-on conditions), is not substantially reduced. The visibility
from the water has been increased; however, staff has not determined a violation has
occurred to the SMO.
printe(t on recycled paper
Comments and Recommendation: Typically, when cutting and tree removal of this type
occurs, the area restores itself quickly as it is opened up to sunlight; this provides for
vigorous regrowth. Subsequent trimming is usually needed to manage this growth and
should be done with a landscape plan in mind that is approved by the City. The Public
Works Superintendent has reviewed this case and would prefer the Fire Lane remain
open.
Staff recommends approval of the request for the Land Alteration Permit and would
suggest the following conditions.
1) The applicant shall install sod on the disturbed areas of the Fire Lane by October
31,2000.
2)
The applicant shall complete a landscape plan for the restoration of the affected
areas. This plan shall include the installation of one - 2 ~ inch caliper tree of a
native variety as required by the Parks Director. The work shall be done with the
coordination of the Parks Director.
3) The applicant shall submit a $500.00 escrow to the City from which staff time and
cost may be deducted to defray the City's expense.
*The abutting owners have been notified.
Js/rkj
PUBLIC LAND PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF MOUND, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
· -' DISTRIBUTION: .
BUILDING OFFICIAL
PARKS DIRECTOR
DNR
MCWD
~PUBi/C WORKS _ x t x
~ I ' CONSTRUC"TION ON PUBLIC LAND I~ERMIT
DATE RECEIVED
DOCK MEETING DATE
CITY COUNCIL DATE
- new con~ucti'om
55364
NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL
BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (City Code
Section 320, Subd. I).
I__I
PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT - m allow repairs m an existing structure (City Code Section
320, Sub& 3).
CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - m allow an exis~ng encroachment to remain in aa 'as is' condition
(City Code Section 320, Subd. 3).
LAND ALTERATION - clmage in shoreline, draln~ge, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc. (City Code Section 320,
Sub& 4).
The structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publldy owned lands. Structures like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc.
are aH NONCONFORMING USES. It- is the intent of the City to bring aH these uses into conformance which means that those
structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. AH permits are granted for a limited time and
are non-U-ansferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a .new
is applied for due to change in dock site holder.
Applicant
Abutting
ProDertv
Legal
Description
Public
Property
Contractor
,, \
Phone (home) ~%~ DO( gx~q (work) G(3 ~ ~0
Address '~ 9~ ~P ~.~4 0 I~.~ ,~C, ......... '
~Zock
Name ~,'~0~ G, ~,¢~7
Dock Site ~ Shoreline ~e
Name ~ ~ ~~'1~ - -- ~-~-- ~~ ~?
Address
Phone
VALUATION/PROPOSED COST OF PRO/ECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS):
Sig~natare o~-Ap??t
\ #
\
\
\
\
\
// ~g53,3
DOES NO1 RISE 25 FEET ABOVF-.- '~ ~,~
I'R 0 POSED EL E VA TIONS
?'01' OF FOUND/ITION 955.84
GARAGE FLOOR 951.40
947.00
LOll' Fi. OOR
JOB NO. 000080
.lOB NO. 991271
~925 Island View Drive
'red Johnson
-0/17/00
0
0
T
~o
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
October 6, 2000
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Memorandum
Jim Fackler, Park Director,
Stairway Estimates.
I sent out a request for quotes for the stairways at
Bluebird and Canary Lane on Wiota Commons to four
contractors. Of the four contractors two responded. I met
with both on site reviewed the intended construction design.
The contractors were made aware that there has to be
aesthetic design differences between current stairways and
handrails and the new stairways and handrails.
In reviewing the two quotes, along with visiting previous
job sites, it is staffs opinion to go with All Seasons
Landscape & Design if the DCAC and City Council agrees to
having the work performed.
The cost breakdown is as follows;
Ail Season
Concept
Bluebird Ln.
Canary Ln.
$4,801.00
3,443.00
$10,024.00
13,536.00
TOTAL = $8,244.00
$23,560.00
pr~nte~ on recycled paper
L~ Lanclscape & Design, Inc.
Telephone (320) 5B7-"~ 066
1-$00-657-0175
Fax (320) 234-7138
TO'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Jim Fackler, City of Mound
Steve, All Seasons Landscape & Design, Inc.
October 4, 2000
References
These are some references for you to go and look at.
City of Minnetonka
Behind baseball fields
11522 Minnetonka Blvd.
M!nnetonka, MN 55305
And
5049 Shoreline Drive
Mound, MN
This is some rental property. The person that runs it is Cathy Turner.
will not be at this location, but you can see it from the road.
She
.~my other questions, please feel free to contact mc.
Sincerely,
Steve
14848 Hwy. 7 East. Hutchinson, MN 55350
CITY OF MOUND
DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION
AUGUST 17, 2000
Present were: Chair Jim Funk, Commissioners Mark Goldberg, Gerald Jones, Frank
Ahrens, and Oreg Eurich, and Council Representative Mark Hanus. Also present were
Park Director Jim Fackler, and Dock Inspector Tom McCaffrey.
Chair Funk called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
1. MINUTES
Motion was made by Ahrens, seconded by Jones, to approve the minutes of
the July 20, 2000 DCAC meeting as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
2. AGENDA CHANGES
Agenda approved as presented.
DISCUSS: THE STAIRWAYS AT WIOTA COMMONS ON BLUEBIRD AND
CANARY
City Manager Kandis Hanson introduced herself and addressed the Commission regarding
complaints she has received earlier this summer regarding a stainNay that has been
removed by the City due to deterioration. An unknown individual has dug "stair-like" steps
into the hillside that the City had regraded when the stairway was removed.
Mary Pierce, 1741 Bluebird Lane then addressed the Commission regarding the erosion
on this hillside. Ms. Pierce is asking that this location for steps be re-evaluated and
possibly new steps put in.
Park Director Fackler stated that there had been annual repairs done to both of these
areas, but eventually one was taken out, and the other needs extensive repair at this time.
One of the concerns was the financial impact of Woodland Point before any decision could
be made on this issue. In addition to Bluebird and Canary, there is another stairway
needing to be replaced at Gull.
Councilmember Hanus stated that the rumor is that this area is lined up for the next
litigation, after Woodland Point is done. One of the attitudes of the City is to not put
additional funds into this area now when the City may lose it completely in the near future.
Commissioner Goldberg stated that just because this is a possibility may not be a reason
for the City to not go ahead and improve the access, especially for safety issues. He
asked what would keep the City from going ahead and fixing these areas.
Councilmember Hanus stated that one consideration is the value of it since these areas
are accessible by other means. These other means may not be as convenient, but they
are available.
Mounds Dock and Commons Advisory Commission August 17, 2000
Commissioner Jones stated that there is an approved budged for 2000, and out of that
~ome docks have been purchased and so on, and none of this money had been set aside
'or stairs. For 2001, a figure of $5,000 was set aside for stairs. The estimate for these
repairs and replacements is approximately $23,000. Also, the settlement for Woodland
Point is going to include stairs as well. In some of these areas, the stairs were not
originally built by the City and in one of these areas, the bank was filled in and seeded but
someone went in and dug stairs. Commissioner Jones suggested a way to take care of
this is for the City to put up some kind of fencing to keep the people from using this grade.
Commissioner Ahrens questioned the estimated cost for stairs that may need to be
installed at Woodland Point.
Park Director Fackler stated it would probably be under $40,000 and right now there is
about $13,200 left in the Capital Outlay for 2000.
Commissioner Goldberg stated if the City is going to have docks down there that people
have to get to, access does have to be provided. Liability is less important than making
sure that the dock program is being run well. Also, this area has been paying dock fees
for quite some time, and has probably built up a balance that could then be spent on their
area. One of the main reasons raising dock fees is justifiable is the raising costs in this
system. Commissioner Goldberg suggested if the dock program is over funded, one of the
issues may be that there is under spending and in looking at these stairs, he felt that was
Councilmember Hanus stated he disagreed, as there was a reason that these stairs were
not repaired or replaced when removed. Right or wrong, there was a reason and it was
not simply the neglect of the dock program.
Julie Weisenhorn, 1733 Bluebird Lane, then addressed the Commission, adding that the
stairs were not in horrible condition until the City drained the fire hydrant and basically blew
them out. She stated that site has been taken care of by the users, and suggested the City
could then come in and repair the steps.
Commissioner Goldberg suggested not putting the stair offthe end of Canary and Bluebird
since it would not be that much of an inconvenience to put stairs at the end of one which
can be used for both.
Ms. Weisenhorn replied that this situation would probably not work, as the people would
have to walk through two properties, and this may lead to even more problems.
Ms. Pierce questioned whether these repairs could be written into the budget for repair in
2001, as it is close to the end of the boating season this year.
.~mber Hanus replied that this was discussed, but the initial proposed budget has
to be done in September, and is then finalized in December, which does not leave much
time for estimates and other necessary information to be gathered.
Mounds Dock and Commons Advisory Commission August 17, 2000
Commissioner Ahrens questioned what areas were included in Woodland Point, and asked
if the stairs under discussion were included in any existing litigation right now.
Councilmember Hanus answered the litigation ran from Eagle to Jennings Bay, but the
Bluebird and Canary sites are not included in this litigation. However, there is talk that they
will bring a lawsuit when Woodland Point has been settled.
Chair Funk stated that safety should probably be the overriding factor in this decision, and
not the outcome of the suit. The money is in the dock fund to use, although there may
have to be some trading with other spending that is wanted.
Commissioner Ahrens stated that $23,000 or more is the amount being discussed, but he
would prefer to have more bids before going ahead with the stairs. He suggested the
specs can be sent out and staff can come back to the next meeting with additional bids.
Commissioner Jones suggested finding a different way to flush the hydrants in the future
as well, in order to not blow out new stairs that are installed.
Commissioner Goldberg suggested that in addition to more bids, optional materials could
be looked into as well.
City Manager Hanson stated that staff would work on getting competitive bids for both
sites, and using different materials as well. That information would be presented at the
next Dock Commission meeting.
Commissioner Goldberg asked if there was a possibility that these two stairways could be
done this year.
Park Director Fackler stated that fall is actually the best season to have these types of
projects done. He noted that Spring is the prime season so prices tend to be higher and
the wait tends to be longer. He stated it could definitely be done this year.
DISCUSS: PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT
Mark J. Smith, 4665 Island View Drive
Dock Site 41824, Devon Commons
Park Director Fackler summarized the request for Pubic Lands Permit by Mark Smith to
use an existing light pole to attach a light and electrical sockets. As the pole is in good
condition and has been at this location since at least 1972, staff recommends approval with
the condition that all electrical work be done by a qualified electrical contractor and be
approved by the State Electrical Inspector.
Motion made by Goldberg, seconded by Jones, to approve the staff
recommendation to grant the public lands permit to Mark J. Smith, 4665
Island View Drive, Dock Site 41824, Devon Commons. Motion carried
unanimously.
3NCEPT LANDSCAPING
53 PRIEST LANE
0UND, MN 55364
;APES
TTN: MITCH
~.00 KINGS ROAD
XCELSIOR, MN 55331
TAMARACK LANDSCAPE
ATTN: DAVE
1247 KINDEN DRIVE
WACONIA, MN 55387
ALL SEASONS
14848 HWY 7 EAST
HUTCH~S0N, M]q 55350
September 14, 2000
Jim Fackler, Park Director
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN. 55346
Subject: Installation of Stairways.
Dear Sir,
The City of Mound is seeking estimates for two stairways to
be installed this Fall at the locations designated on the
enclosed map.
Your estimate needs to meet the Minimum Stairway
Specification as described in the handout provided with this
letter.
Estimates need to be returned to me no latter then October
2, 2000 with complete material description and finished
stairway design.
Please feel free to contact me for a site inspection at
952-472-06~/r~ ·
~/~im FackL~r
enclosures: Map
Minimum Stairway Specification
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX ~6; 2') 477.-0620
August 28, 2000
MINIMUM STAIRWAY SPECIFICATION
STEP UNIT:
Material Composition .......... High quality zero
slump concrete.
Compressive Strength .............. 3000 psi min.
Absorption Rate ....................... 7.0% max.
Dimensions ......................... 6"x 16"x 12"
Approximate Weight ...................... 85 lbs.
STAIRWAY INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS:
Design .............................Running Bond
Base Pad ........ 6" min. Compacted Granular Base
Minimum Run ................ 10" (Variation 3/8")
Maximum Rise ............... 6" (Variation 3/8")
HANDRAILS:
Shall be placed not less than 34 inches nor more
than 38 inches above the nosing of the treads.
Rail end shall be returned or terminated in
newel posts or safety terminals. Handrails must
be provided with four or more riser. The
handgrip portion of the handrails shall be not
less than 1 1/2 inches nor more than 2 inches in
cross-sectional dimension and shall have a
smooth surface with no sharp corners. Note
attached drawing.
Contractor will provide two handrail designs, one
using a rust resistant metal and one with
pressure treated wood.
prmted on recycled paper
GUARDRAIL:
LANDING:
Open guardrail shall have intermediate rail such
that a 4 inch diameter sphere cannot pass
through. Note attached drawing. Contractor will
provide two guardrail designs, one using a rust
resistant metal and one with pressure treated
wood.
Every landing shall have a minimum dimension of
40 inches There shall not be more than 12 feet
vertically between landings. Note attached
drawing.
HAND RAIL
l~qr'
Handrail ,,.., .
NOT
FIGURE N(3. 54-..-&CCF_FTA~LE HANI3RAIL DETAILS
[Section ;306 (t')] .
GUARDRAILS
LESS THAN
\
LESS THAN .-
Open guardrails shall have intermediate rails or an ornamental pattern sucll
that a sphere 4 inches in diameter cannot pass through.
EXCEPTION: The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and
bottom element of a guardrail at the open side of a stairway may be o¢ sucll
size that a sphere 6 inches in diameter cannot pass through.
1994 UBC SEC. 509.3
E TAIR
LANDINGS
12'
Maximum
maximum
DISTANCE BETWEEN LANDINGS
WHERE X = THE ST,~.!RWAY WIDTH
AND Y = THE LENGTH OF LANDING,
,- X
BUT NEED
Y NOT EXCEED
Y
Y IS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO X
STAIRWAYS:
Canary Ln. S.
Bluebi rcl Ln.
I
I.
PETITION FOR WIOTA COMMONS STAIRWAY
TO: MOUND DOCX AND COlVIMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION
FROM: RESIDENTS OF 1700 BLOCK OF CANARY LANE
SUBJECT: WIOTA COMMONS STAIRWAY AND SECURITY LIGHTING
DATE: 10/18/2000
CC: CITY OF MOUND
We, the residents of the 1700 Block of Canary Lane in the Dreamwood Addition of
Mound, hereby petition the Mound Dock and Commons Advisory Commission for the
following:
[1] Replace the commons stairway that was removed in early July, 1999 with an upgraded
and safe stairway in which to access our commons docks from Canary Lane;
[2] Install a street lamp at the end of Canary Lane to provide a safe access to the
commons during evening hours.
Thanks!
16 October 2000
TO:
RE:
City Manager- Kandis Hanson
Honorable Mayor - Pat Meisel
Mound City Council
Renaming of Pembroke Park
Dear Ms. Hanson & City Council,
This letter is a formal request by some of the citizens of Mound to rename
Pembroke Park on the Island to Don Scher~en Memorial Park. The name
Pembroke comes from the original subdivision of the area and is not readily
connected to any persons from the area that can be ascertained.
Donald A. "Don" Scherven Sr. recently passed away. Don was a lifelong resident of
Island Park, living directly across the street from Pembroke Park for all of his 71+
years. Don graduated from Mound High School and served our country in the Navy
during the Korean War. His love of the water is legendary as an avid swimmer,
boater and fisherman, and he played golf at the Mound golf course where Shirley
Hills is now located. Upon returning from the service Don was heavily involved in the
community.
Don and his family operated the Island Park grocery store on the property across
from Pembroke Park where his descendants still reside. For many years he helped
maintain the park including mowing, cleaning, leaf and branch removal, policing, etc.
Don's civic activities included being a charter member of and continually active in
the Northwest Tonka Lions Club from its inception in 1951, serving as President in
1962-'63. He also received the Melvin Jones award for lifelong service to the
community, the highest award afforded a Lions member. Don was instrumental in
ensuring the growth of the Upper Tonka Little League by being the coach of a team
for 34 years and sponsoring a team for 28 years. He also served as the foreman for
the building of both concession stands at the Little League fields. He was a proud
member of the Mound posts of the American Legion and VFW.
Don and his brother built and ran the Island Park Skelly station where they provided
school bus service and an ambulance for the Island back when most of the roads
were unpaved and difficult to traverse.
We, as citizens of Mound, can be proud of the accomplishments of one of our life-
long residents and his dedication to the community. Naming the park after him
would be an honor and fitting tribute to his memory. Thank you for your
consideration and time in this matter. Please let me know if there is any additional
information that you should need to proceed with this request.
Sincerely,
Michael Mueller
5910 Ridgewood Road
472-5302
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
Memo
To:. Kandis Hanson
From: Len Harrell
Dat~ 10/12/00
Re-' Sheriff's Transport Change
I have attached the letter from the sheriff's office notifying departments that they will no longer
provide pdsoner transport after midnight because of budget constraints at the county.
Per your request, I have attempted to pull together some numbers to show the possible
impact on the police department. Since January 1, 2000, we have lodged 67 people in jail or
the detention center downtown. Approximately half (33) have been taken down after
midnight either by our officers or in combination with our offk,,ers and the transport service.
Transport has normally met our squads in Minnetonka or Wayzata to assist with transporting
prisoners downtown.
The reduction of the "dog watch" transport will require our officers to transport prisoners from
Mound to the jail downtown, approximately twenty miles away. Our "dog watch" officers are
working alone the majodty of the time which means that the City will be without coverage for
approximately two hours each transport. Based upon the figures for nine months,
approximately forty-four transports take place after midnight when the majority of the time we
have only one officer on duty.
If one were to look at calling officers in to assist in transports to maintain an officer on the
street the cost would be approximately $5,280 (using a $60/hr overtime rate with mileage).
This is a "worst case" scenado where every time a transport is needed there is only one
officer on which may not be the actual case.
® Page I
?ATRICK D. MeGOWAN
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
oROOM 6 COURTHOUSE
350 SOUTH FIFTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415
(612) 348-3740
FAX 348-4208
September 25, 2000
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF
Chief Leonard Harrell
Mound Police Department
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear ChiefHarrell:
At the September 2000 meeting of the Hennepin Chiefs of Police Association, I announced that the
Hennepin County Sheriff's Office will be discontinuing our prisoner transport service on the night shill
know this service has been helpful to you by keeping your officers in your community, however, I want
you to know that our decision to discontinue this service was driven by the economic realities of the
:iscal Year 2001 Hennepin County departmental budgets.
We have recently completed what has been a very challenging budget cycle. All Hennepin County
departments and offices have been directed to prepare 2001 budgets not to exceed 2% of tax revenues. In
addition, the Sheriff's Office was forced to make further compromises in order to balance the demands of
opening the new Public Safety Facility in August 2001.
For the first time in this Administration, we have been forced to reduce law enforcement services in order
to meet our mandated county budget guidelines. This is a painful decision for us and we acknowledge
that it will place additional hardship upon your department, as well. ~
We apologize for this inconvenience, but rest assured we will continue to support you in every way we
are able. We ask for your understanding as we straggle to meet county financial goals. Should you have
any questions in this policy change, please contact Inspector Bill Wilen at (612) 348-9650.
Sincer/slY?
Patrick D. McGowan
Hennepin County Sheriff
Recycled Paper
20 % Post-
Consumer Fiber
Mediacom
Mediacorn LLC
1504 2nd Street S.E.
Waseca, MN $6093
Phone: (507) 82,5-2356
Fax: (507) 835-4567
Dear Elected Officials,
It is sun outage time again. This interference occurs twice a year, once in spring
and again in the fall. A "sun outage" occurs when the sun is positioned in
alignment with the satellite and our Receive Antenna. The solar flares from the
sun are stronger than the transmitted signal and cause interference in receiving the
signal. The interference can vary from minor sparks in the picture to complete
channel outage.
This interference occurs between September 25th and October 20th each year, from
1:49 p.m. to 3:42 p.m. This is an approximate time and will not affect all satellite
channels at the same time.
Sun outages will affect digital signals differently than .analog signals. Digital
signals will start to get extra noise in the audio, then gq) completely off (normally
less than five minutes). When it comes back on, the channel will appear suddenly
and with clear reception. With analog channels, the picture will get noisy and then
gradually fade completely away. When it comes back .on, it will fade back slowly
until all the noise and sparkles are completely gone. Again this type of outage
normally only lasts a few minutes.
If any subscribers would like more information, they may log on the website,
www . spacecom.com
http://www.spacecom.com/Customer Tools/SpaceCom web utilities.htm There
is a sun outage calculator at this web site that allows anyone to calculate outage
times for his or her local area and system.
If you have any further questions or concerns regarding the above, please call our
Customer Service Department at 1-800-332-0245.
Sincerely,
Arnold P Cool
Regional Manager
Central Region
Mediacom
Profile
Group Works to Change Attitudes Toward Public
Sector Employees
public sector employees--those
people who work for the govern-
ment at the city, county, state, or
federal level--are ( 1 ) too lazy to find
jobs in the private sector, (2) marking
time until their pensions 'kick in, (3)
not ambitious enough to jump-start
their careers, or (4) all of the above.
The last answer is the common per-
ception. And it frustrates public
employees no end. One unit of govern-
ment in the Twin Cities metropolitan
area is working overtime to change the
mindset that public employees don't
deserve the rewards and flexibility that
private sector workers can command in
this tight labor market.
Scott County, Minnesota,
Administrator Dave Unmacht has insti-
sort of organizational culture
that is commonplace in corpo-
rations but rare in government. For
nearly two years, he has been meeting
with employees to discuss challenges
and solutions in five areas: leadership,
internal stress ("what we put upon our-
selves"), communication, personal rela-
tionships, and creativity or innovation.
Strong Union Presence
Unmacht learned, for instance, that
supervisors need to be better trained to
deal with grievances in a workforce that
is 70 percent unionized. He learned
that some managers resist any trend
toward job sharing or part-time work,
while others embrace it. Most impor-
tant, he learned that, contrary to the
stereotype, Scott County employees are
passionate and want to make a differ-
ence in their work.
Concrete progress remains slow,
Unmacht concedes. He can't imple-
ment pay-for-performance and other
initiatives without the blessing of the
)unty's seven unions. But the conver-
been started, and this in
Rank-and-file employees in the
public sector aren't used to being asked
for their opinions or ideas. John
Varone, an eligibility specialist who is
David Unmacht is administrator of Scott
County, Minnesota.
president of Scott County's largest
union, the American Federation of
State, County, and Municipal
Employees, meets with Unmacht every
month just to have a cup of coffee or
stroll down the street. "He's taking it
slow;' Varone says. "He didn't come in
and try to reinvent the wheel."
Unmacht recently met with a divi-
sion of Scott County employees that
includes maintenance'workers and
technology professionals. His message
to the "suits" didn't vary from what he
told the guys with names stitched on
their shirts, drinking Mountain Dew:
"Doing things the way you did them
last year is just an excuse for not think-
ing7' he said.
Sit at a meeting with Unmacht and
his staff, and you hear the language of
business: family-friendly policies, mis-
sion, restructuring, the bottom line.
You hear people refer to the Wall Street
Journal or the latest business best-seller.
Forget for a moment that our taxes pay
their salaries. If the chairs weren't
molded plastic, you'd swear you were in
a corporate boardroom. And, in many
ways, you are.
A "quiet Crisis"
The same pressures that are forcing the
private sector to speed up, flatten hier-
archies, and reward employees differ-
ently also are affecting government.
Unmacht's job is much like that of a
CEO. He oversees 600 employees and a
budget of $56 million in one of the
fastest-growing counties in the state.
His office is in the courthouse in
Shakopee, a once-sedate small town
now ringed by metropolitan freeways.
Valleyfair and Mystic Lake Casino are
in Scott County, which is working to
attract an industrial tax base to keep
pace with its residential development.
Like all employers, Unmacht strug-
gles to find and keep people. Like all
employed parents, he struggles to bal-
ance his career and family. Like many
manufacturing executives, he struggles
to please a unionized workforce that
assumes that change initiatives will not
work in their favor.
Unlike a company president, how-
ever, Unmacht has less freedom to
adopt the business strategies now pop-
ular for attracting and retaining work-
ers: flexible schedules, telecommuting,
merit raises, hiring bonuses. That's why
his reengineering process is unique--
and commendable.
He has to convince employees and
the public. "It's very different from the
private sector," says Lori Huss, the
county's employee relations coordina-
tor in charge of recruiting. "We can't
compete with private sector companies
in saying, 'I'll give you three weeks'
extra vacation or a huge raise.' Most of
our positions are under contract."
County employees know that the
laws of supply and demand have tilted
in workers' favor. And some can't resist
the carrot. "The number-one thing that
people tell us when they leave is that
they're going to higher-paying jobs,"
Huss says.
Unmacht has dubbed this dilemma a
"quiet crisis." To an outsider, it looks
more like the proverbial vicious circle:
the perception of public employees
lowers morale and may discourage tal-
ented people from applying. The
worker shortage allows private sector
JULY '~000
Profile
to negotiate pay and perks
public sector can't support.
Meanwhile, Unmacht's employees--
and Unmacht himself~are facing the
same work/life demands that stress out
everyone these days. His wife, Mary, is
a registered nurse at Abbott-
Northwestern Hospital. Their three
children are under 10.
"Times are changing, and Dave is an
active parent," says Pam Johnson, an
employee relations representative who
has worked at Scott County for 20
years. She has heard Unmacht describe
the chaos of getting the children out
the door in the morning because his
wife is at work. "He's a real person,"
~ohnson says. "He's dealing with the
same issues that every person with fam-
ilies or children is dealing with."
That human quality, his ability to con-
nect with people, is winning Unmacht
friends in corners where prex4ous Scott
County administrators were distrusted.
"I have union members say I'm sleeping
with the enemy, and that hurts a little
bit," says John Varone, the AFSCME
j~nt. "The atmosphere is just differ-
more relaxed. He can joke. I can
oke. And we can still be disagreeing."
Office politics is a reality of every-
body's work life. For public employees,
however, "politics" has a literal mean-
ing beyond the usual hallway gossip
and games. Unmacht reports to a five-
person county board that can make or
break his culture-changing initiatives.
Work/Life Balance
So far, says Barbara Marschall, the only
woman on the board, the commission-
ers have been receptive to Unmacht's
themes about work/life balance, trans-
forming the workplace culture, the
need for training and personal develop-
ment, and holding employees account-
able for how the system works. "The
more Dave goes out and says it to
employees, the Rotary, and the cham-
ber of commerce, the more the concept
is being understood," she says.
But Scott County historically has
been a conservative place. Some resi-
dents resist the trend toward urban
pment, just as some long-term
resist what Unmacht
has deemed progress. A group called
Scott County Citizens Opposed to
Unnecessary Taxation, or SCCOUT,
was formed about five years ago and
still makes its presence known. ~We've
had an active citizenry voice saying,
'My taxes are too high. You're wasting
my money,'" Marschall says.
Deputy County Administrator Gary
Shelton sees some resistance within the
ranks. But he cites progress, too, such
as the technology manager who came
to Scott County from the city of Apple
Valley and the database administrator
Shelton wooed away from private
industry.
"He was making a lot of money, but
he was tied to a pager," Shelton says.
"He had a cabin up north, but he
couldn't enjoy it. We can offer the chal-
lenge. At the same time, our approach
is that you have to enjoy the fruits of
your labor. Or why bother?"
--Amy Gage
Staff Columnist
Pioneer Press
St. Paul, Minnesota
E-mail, agage@pioneerpress.com
Reprinted with permission from Pioneer Press.
Copyright 2000 PioneerPlanet/St. Paul (Min-
nesota) Pioneer Press. All rights reserved.
Am I a Leader?
Count), Administrator Dave
Unmacht, Scott County, Minnesota,
has spent nearly two years develop-
ing an organizational change process
called "A Conversation with Scott
County Employees."
Unmacht tells his 600 employees,
from the unionized stree,t..cleaners to
the suited professionals, that every
one of them can be a leader. Below is
one challenge he has presented to
employees during a series of small-
group meetings that began last June:
Ask yourself, Am I leader? If not,
why not?
How can I make a difference in my
life?
What have I done to effect change in
my work?
What do I see when I look in the
mirror?
What one thing can I do to enhance
my work culture?
Do I accept the status quo as the only
future I have?
Do I inhibit or encourage positive
growth and change?
The '
M'ore than 4,000 local govern
.ments have turned to LGI for
technical assistance publications,
software, and services. LGI's most
popular manual/disk sets include:
Job Descriptions Local Govt.- $99
.lob Descriptions for IT~IS - $99
Model Personnel Policies - $69
Risk Mngmnt/Loss Control - $69
Performance Management - $69
Ethics in the Public Sera, ice - $79
Drug and Alcohol Testing- $59
CM Swwival Kit - $49
Police Operations & Training- $149
LOE
T-
ob.ne'
WWWo
"The easiest, most cost-effective
recruitment tool at your disposal
· Low ad rates - $49/ea.
· No word or time limit
· Link to your web site
· Free to job seekers
Local Govt. Institute
To order, or for
contact Don Morrison
Phone: 253/565-6253
Fax: 253/565-2575
Email: lgi~lgi.org .
4009 Bridgeport Way W., Suite
Tacoma, WA 98466
- www. lgi.org-
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
21
For our Neighbors:
Information About the Tonka Cleanup Project
BARR
Because you live near the former Tonka toy plant, we wanted to let you
know about the cleanup project that is currently under way. Chances are
you've heard about this project, which was approved by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency and the Mound City Council. Our plans have also
been written up in recent editions of The Laker and The Lakeshore Weekly
News.
Briefly, we're cleaning up groundwater from beneath the site by creating
a wetland in the small channel leading to Harrison Bay. As groundwater flows
through the wetland, chemicals in the groundwater will degrade naturally. The
new wetland will protect the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and---once it's
built--will provide open space and increased shoreline protection for the
neighborhood.
Work should be finished by the end of November. While we don't expect
the construction to cause any major disruptions, we wanted to let you know
what to expect in the next few weeks.
What's that noise?
During the first weeks, you may hear a hammering noise or feel slight
vibrations as we install the structures that will shape the wetland. You may
also hear sawing as some smaller trees are cleared. No large trees will be
cut down.
There will be very little truck traffic going to and from the site. However,
there will be a crane, bulldozer, and backhoe working at the site, so thers will
be some construction noise during the day.
What's that smell?
During construction, soil at the site will be dug up. When this happens,
you may smell swampy odors or a "rotten-egg" smell from decaying vegeta-
tion. Because the weather has been cool and dry lately, these natural wetland
odors may not be noticeable.
Important: If you detect a "rotten-egg" smell in or around your house, it could
be a natural-gas leak not related to the construction work. You should always
contact your utility company and/or the Mound Fire Department immediately if
you think what you smell is a natural-gas leak.
Who can I talk to?
If you're concerned about something related to work at the site, you can
contact Joe Berns of Barr Engineering Company. Joe is overseeing con-
struction and can answer your questions. His cell phone number is
612-306-3512. He will generally be at the site during daylight hours Monday
through Fdday until the project is finished.
Association of
Hetropolitan
Hunicipalities
DATE: October 5, 2000
TO:
Mayors, Manager/Administrators and Councilmembers
FROM: Gene Ranieri, Executive Director
RE:
Seeking Applications for the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)
There will be four vacancies for elected city officials on the Transportation Advisory
Board (TAB) commencing Jan. 1, 2001. This is a two-year appointment and officials
will be eligible for reappointment thereafter. Applications may be either mayors or
councilmembers.
The TAB is an important transportation advisory body which provides input to the
Metropolitan Council on selection of projects to receive federal transportation funds.
It fulfills a federal requirement that local elected officials be a part of the selection
process thus allowing the Metropolitan Council to be designated as this area's
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The TAB helps coordinate
transportation planning, implements the solicitation process for federal TEA21 funds,
adopts the regional transportation improvement program (TIP-S2 billion), and
participates in the Metro Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) development.
Positions being filled are from cities in Anoka, suburban Hennepin, Washington, and
the south metro area including Dakota, Scott and Carver counties. The Board
considers criteria such as city size, metro location, gender and relevant experience.
The Board at its Nov. 9 meeting will consider all nominations. The Metropolitan
Council will then approve the Board's nominees.
Interested persons should send a cover letter and resume to the AMM office no later
than Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2000. If you have questions or need additional information,
please call me at 651-215-4001.
L\TAB-10-00solicitation.doc
145 University A venue West
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103-2044
Telephone: (651) 215-4000
Fax: (651) 281-1299
E-mail: amm@amm145.org
W F, 8, T 0 N K.A
Healthy Community
Collaborative
Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
Agenda - Oct.20, 7:15 - 9:00 a.m.
Mound CiW Hall
1. Social Coffee, tea, rolls, fruit and juice start at 7:15
2. Introductions 7:30
3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes
4..Announcements (5 min.)
5. Brainstorm and Idea Exchange
We will discuss issues related to our current work groups and our new strategic planning. Come
with an open mind to look at our work load and how to best to reach our goals.
Things to consider -
Current work groups:
1. Community 2. Health 3. Youth Activities 4. Parenting 5. Media and Public Relations
6. Finance and Operations 7. and the Executive Work Group.
Strategic Planning Goals:
1. Substance Abuse 2. Domestic Abuse 3. Stuff for Kids to do - Adults too 4. Community Pride
Allies for Change Grants:
These axe non-competitive grants through the .Mliance for Families and Children in Hennepin
County.
1. Juvenile Justice-We axe part of a pilot project with this grant. We need to wait and see what, it'
any direction comes from that.
2. Parent Mobilizatien-Sue Cathers and .Gm Krause have attended meetings on this grant. They
axe meeting themselves to come up with some ideas for this grant.
3. Kids Mobility and Stability-Margaret Holste is meeting with counselors to discuss possibilities
with this grant and school attendance issues.
"Enthusiasm is contagious. Be a carrier."
By Susan Rabin
Health
Carol Olson, Patricia Anderson, Sandy Olstad,
Carolyn Schmidt, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz
The Health work group is working on a newspaper article on Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD).
A high school student will interview Brian Powers and write an article about SAD. The
newspaper will sell ads around the article to business' and local resources related to SAD.
The Health Work Group continues to monitor the progress of the Heattb Advocate Outreach
Project.
Youth Activities
Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Chris Valerius, Sue Cathers,
Jean Ann Thayer, Patsy Kiesow
The Youth Center will open the week after MEA. Every Tuesday the kids will go to Presbyterian
Homes and every Thursday the kids will be at St. Johns itarbor.
The middle school kids are asking about the ska~cpm'k. We will put more uffort into getting the
park built.
Parenting
Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Jeanne Stortz, Bill Erickson
The Parent Group is arranging for speakers Michael Patrick and Misty Snow to come soon.
We are distributing and promoting the video Youth Law Enforcement and Schools - Kids
Sometimes Get in Trouble. If you know of any one interested in showing this video, there should
e copies in the library soon.
Community
Margaret Holste, Cathy Bailey, Cheryl Fischer, Edith Travers
Rex Holzmer, from Hennepin County, ~vill be sending us the money to use for the Pilot Project.
The Community Work Group will need to meet soon.
PR/Media
Jeanne Stortz, Lisa Whalen, Anne Wilbur, Carol Olson
We are working on redoing our brochure. The current brochtu'e i~ getting dated and we are
almost out of the supply we ordered.
The Resource Directory has arrived. We will have copies at the meeting.
Leah is working with Jeanne Brustad-Grandview Middle School, to see about getting a web page
for the WHCC.
Finance and Operations
Mike Looby, Len Harrell, Margaret ttolste, Craig Anderson, Patricia Anderson
The Finance and Operations hasn't met yet. Leah needs to put together all the budget request
items from all the work groups and set a meeting. She will be calling all to set up some possible
meeting times.
Executive
Carol Olson, Jeanne Stortz, Margaret Itolste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer,
Sue Cathers, Mike Looby
The Executive work group discussed purchasing insurance. We also talked about the Allies
Change Grants from the Alliance. We will draft a letter requesting input from the LCTS ti~ne
study participants, the counselors and any one that is involved in attendance issues.
Westonka Healthy Community. Collaborative
Minutes · September 15, 2000
Present: Craig Anderson. Patricia Anderson. John Braland. Sue Cathers. Bill Erickson. Lenny
Harrell, Margaret Holste. Kathy Jones. Patsy Kiesow, Mike Looby, Tony Mills. Carol OIson.
Carolyn Schmidt, Jeanne Stortz. Edith Travers. Chris Valerius, Sandy Raushendorfer, Leah Weycker,
Sandy Wing,
Guests: Peter Meyer, Mark Brekke, Klm Krause, Brigid Riely, Molly Layer
Additions or Changes to the Agenda or :14inutes:
Sue Cathers would like to add an update on the Mound Tobacco Free Future.
Patsy Kiesow would like to talk about the Chambers Taste of the Lakes event.
Kathy Jones would like to talk about the states tobacco money.
Margaret Hoiste would like to talk about WeCAN's Walk to End Hunger.
Add On:
Sue Cathers thanked some of the Collaborative members for helping with the Tobacco Free
Future's phone bank. She also said that Scotty. B's will be going smoke free on Wednesdays to see
how it would be received. The Tobacco Free future group will also present to the Mound City Council
at the Sept. 26th meeting. They hope to pass an ordinance to make all the parks and recreational
facilities smoke free.
Kathy Jones stated that the State is looking to hire someone in our area to deal with the
,acco money.
Patsy Kiesow, the Chambers new Executive Director, announced the Taste of the Lakes
event with the proceeds going to the Westonka Food shelf and student scholarships. She has tickets
available. Last year they sold out so you need to get your tickets soon. The event takes place on
Saturday, Sept. 23.
Margaret Holste announced the WeCAN Walk to End Hunger. Proceeds from this Oct. 8th
event will go to the food shelf and 40% of the money will go to participating churches for a social
project of their choice.
Mike Looby made a motion to approve the minutes. Patricia Anderson seconded
the motion. Motion passed.
Announcements:
The City of Minnetrista presented a check for $4000.00 for the skate park. This is the first
receipt of money and will be a good kick off to get back on track with the skate park. There should
be a photo in todays Laker news paper.
Leah requested that the Finance and Operations work group meet soon. We have a
preliminary budget approved and now the work groups have submitted more definite project budgets.
The F and O work group needs to meet to sort out all the budget requests.
The next WHCC meeting falls on MEA week. Carol asked if there was any conflict with the
people at-tending other meetings. It did not appear to be an issue so the next WHCC meeting
will be October 20.
Leah mentioned lhat the referendum for tile old community center green space did not pass.
Kathy Jones asked if tile WI I/2C had a position on this issue. The WHCC had not discussed this issue
before and did not take a position on it. It does effect the skate park location options.
"The County-Wide Adolescent Health Promotion Plan"- Brigid Riley, Senior
Adolescent Health Promotion Specialist, Hennepin County
Brigid Riley talked about the Hennepin County Public Health Dept. broadening
prevention issues relating to adolescent health. The group has teamed up with others with a goal
to improve and support the health and well~being of adolescents by enhancing the environments
where youth spend time. The work group's charge is: · to collect, interpret and disseminate
adolescent health data, °der(d()l) a community-wi(lc i)lan to address adolescent health in
Hennepin County, and °crt, ate an inf()rmati()n and e(hlcation network for organizations involved
in adolescent health.
Brigid's group hopes to accomplish this through community input and partnerships. She
can be contacted at 612-3,18-4207. A good resot~rce for youth related issues is at the Kmopka
Institute. Web site: www.knopka.umn.edu
The data from the United Way/Alliance-Westonka Children- A Closer Look, will also be
used. Kin Krause asked if mental health issues would also be addressed. Brigid stated that the
mental health piece is separate and is addressed by a different County Department. Surprise Student' "Welcome Back to School" follow up event
We showed the pens and t-shirts and signs that made up a very successful student
~elcome back. Leah read a letter from Jeanne Brustad, a teacher at Grandview, who stated that
this was the most "exciting" event in her 32 years of experience. There were other stories of great
appreciation for doing this event anti touching stories of kids and adults affected by this event.
We talked about some fifllow up event fi)r later in the year. Every one should be thinking about
possibilities. A fe~v mentioned were thmily dance, different colored t-shirts at another time of the
year or winter hats with a message for the kids. St. Louis Park's student senate decided to do
bracelets in the school colors. Jeanne Stortz had meutioned rubber band bracelets with a
message printed on them.
Recommendation from the Health Work Group
Mark Brekke talked about the Health Work Group's idea to inform the public about SAD-
Seasonal Affective Disorder and offer light boxes to the public at a reduced rate. The Health work
group had thought they would he ready to ask tbr funding but the project is running into snags
with liability issues. Mark covered the legal issue if we "promote" the lights we may be liable
because we would be prescribing them or possible product failure. How can we get around the
liability issues since the product is already on the open market? John Braland wondered if this
project represents a goal for us to climb that mountain. Depression issues were discussed. Craig
Anderson suggested that we do articles in the newspaper about SAD and have more than one
manufacture of light boxes buy ads in the section. This would allow the WHCC to get the
information out without holding the personal liability. Mark and the Health Work Group will meet
again to find ways to do this.
Adjournmevt
Strategic Planning
WHCC Meeting
1. Substance Abuse:
· Support Tobacco Free Future group
-ask them what we can do
-fink to Hennepin Co tobacco $
· Ordinance to ban smoking
-calling trees
-srrategize best way to make it happen
-terters
-use data
-start small (parks, sporting events)
· Marijuana
-increasing*
· No beer (Ci~ Days) at beer garden
-the message to youth
-too radical
-responsible dr/nking focus at event(s)
-reminders: posters
-have other things to do
'outh activity, organized by youth
make decisions on how to address drinking
-breathalyzer at door of youth events
-alcohol free events (messages) for youth
· Hoxv do we change culture of acceptance?
-education-ads. billboards
· Identi$' places to reduce drinking in public areas
· What is our message?
-responsibility
-against it
-underage use
-adult use
-support/role of progress for those who
want to quit - don't want to start.
-you are a role model - you send a message
· Educate Parents
-make them responsible for underage
· Support/Encouragement for parents who are saying
"no" and want to take responsibility.
Top Four Priorities
April 21, 20{)0
2. Domestic Abuse:
· Stickersicards with hot line ~ and message
· Use data- it is happening here
· Education - a community efforx
-video- cable TV
-play
-speakers
· Violent Video Games- ? what to do
-educate on the dangers
· Educate on "what is abuse?"
· Bring information to wlaere people are
-half time
-PTA
-adult Sunday school
-parties
· Moratorium on "bad" video games
-most are in homes
-rental places
-enforce ratings
· Alternatives to playing video games
-tips / ideas to parents / youth
-dangers of desensitization
· Domestic summit idea
-taking pictures of damaged property, to use as
evidence.
-victim sign the release immediately
· Connect with Sojourner
, /,//,I
Strategic Planning
WilCC Meeting
Top Four Priorities
April 21, 2000 - page 2
3. Stuff for Kids to do - Adults too
· Outdoor Skate park
· Teen center
· Involve youth, put them on ~l~e committee
· Swim raft at Mound Bay Park
· Skating on Lake Minnetonka
· Refreshment stancL'restrooms at Mound Bay Park
· Theater
· Communir., Center
· Fitness- expand at high school
· Bike trail
· Sports Center
· Super Saturday at high school
-classes for family
· Community. Classes for families
· Non alcohol events
· Support for businesses where kids hag out
,ur job-talk to any kid. any time about inappropriate
behavior
· Block parties
· Youth -your communi~ is watching you, you are safe
· Key- when is it cool for kids
· Out door concert
-battle of the bands
-alcohol fi-ce
4. Community. Pride:
· Gathering place
· Schools are doin*, a ,,ood job
· Saying positive things - continuously
· Support ~oup for parents of older youth - brings
people together
· Self esteem issue
· All giving stone message-raise the bar
· Talk about the progress/the successes
· Let's be who we are - "We are Westonka" campaign
· Support clean up events
· Get major media out here
· 'rake "our community." wherever we go
· successful vs. happy youth
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
~ · · Popula~ t.812
· 20 mllee welt of
-' -" lake MlnnetoaU
· Bedroom
:: 3,600
·
CIE:)
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Lake Mim~ctoaka aad Mound Bay P=k
CID
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· t3 Sworn Officers
· 3 FTE Support
Personnel
· 7 Volunteer Police
· $t.14 Million budget
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Na~onalYouth
program Using ~inl
Bikes
· psrtnemhlp with
Westonka
Collaborative
(:30
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Welcome Back
$chooll
Shirley H~I~
Elementary
Westonka Chamimr,
Westonka Family
Collabora~ve,
Parents, T~achem,
and Police welcome
back .l~dent~ in
September.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Welcome a~ Grandvicw Middlc School
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CID
· DARE pro~m taught
to over ~00 children
per y~mr.
· Grad# 1, 3, and 5.
· Paflnemldp with
department and
ropeatod in 8th gra~ ~
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Graduation for Our
Elementa[y Sth grade.
Pamnt~
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
OD
· The Westonka DARE
Open has rabed over
$65,000 in support of
our local crime fund
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CID
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
aD
· Youth Clttzen's
Academy at tho
Grandvlew Middle
School
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
thc Noghw~st Tonka
Lio~ Oub
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Public Safety Days
· In partnership with
Early Childhood &
Family Education
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CID
· Hennepin Parks Horse
Patrol assl~t~ McGruff
and trio "crash
dummies" at Public
Safet~ Day.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· ~' ~ · Mound Fire entemllns
-,_ -.-~'i~-" i~(' : ......~'~ Sefety Day,end infomm et Public
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Summer Safety Camp
· State Patrol helicopter
lends at Mound Bay
Park
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· NSP teaching about
high line ~afety
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
First Aid Awareness with Rldgevtew Psram~dica
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Weaflmr Safety
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
OlD
Mound Police
arranse spo.in8
youth
orsaniz~tion.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· DARE Gym Nights
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Na~onal Night Out
participants
MOUN~ POt ICF I'~FPARTMF:NT
Officer Chrlstenson prepares for Nadonal Night Out
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CID
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Sw~....~a Pa'[
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Thr~ Points P~k
aD
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CID
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
~..~~ · 1st Gmduate~ of our
· ' Cittz~n'~ Academy
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Curriculum
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
r~'~ · ':~ · Recent graduates of
Citizen's Academy
· Coume repeated twice
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
~ · Academy participant
..,:- '-. :~ : ~.;~ Ilam. how quickly a
· '~, "' ' ~.~ trat"l~c ~top can turn
,,~ ~ _ . :~ uglyl
.-.~
lid
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Ac4~emy Students & Sts~ Patrol Helicopter
~-~?~3~:':~ :;!~':'::
C:]D
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Academy .t~d®nt~
'tie one on" to leam
about driving
impairment and DUI's
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mound Fire completes
· e first aid and crash
manage~ ~on
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· "REX" and Sgt..
McKinley, 1986
National USPCA
Clmmpion Canine
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Canine "Ranger" was
donated by the Mound
Cr~me Prevention
Association.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Summer bicycle patrol
C3D
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
OD
· Crime Fund donations
provided AED'*, for
~s police and fire
departments
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
(:1[::3
· Local "SMART" trailer
provided ~rough a
partnership of three
crime funds and
shared by local
department~.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Citizen & Employee
Awards Dinner
Currant and past
crime fund
presidents
honored along
with a citizen
commendatiomj~,.~
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
New Chaplaincy Program in partncnhip with local
pa~tom and fl~'ee neighboring police depm'~ents.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
t,-"'~._~ . ].= 3~1 · Officer Ewald meets
regularly with local
seniors to provide
assistance and
Information.
I Scnio~s enjoy 'sat'cry s~min~r' -~
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
aD
· Member of
SoutJtwest Metro Drug
Task Force
· Providing current
Coordinator
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Christmas Program
with
Mound~Nestonka
Rotary Club
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
crr;z~N Ii~-----~--- - ''r'---
COMMENT
c~ :_:.: ,-=_-.~_ ---:.i~
:~ :---=~--- ill
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CID
· Comment cards am
randomly ~ent to
approximately 400
citizen contacts per
year.
· Officem are
consistently rated at
approximately 3.5 on
a 4 point scale
MOUND POUCE DEPARTMENT
· The flint year all 3~X)
houeehold~ reeebmd
an offV, er ~
Every other year
officer, do ·
door euwey
fledblck frOtll
community; 3~
r..do.~y
lid
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· 2000-20g~ Patrol and
SergeantS ContractS
· Incentives for college
education, physical
fitne~, living/owning
in the community, and
~d~,R~ problem
eolving
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
OperaOoa Sat'¢ SDok~
CiD
bi~les ~d
bikes ~o ~heir
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
iF~ to off~ mom
t T" oppommities for
Academy
CIE3
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Program to prevent
thefts from vehicle~.
* Over 90% Involving
unlocked vehicles
wtth valuables clearly
visible.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· Program to provide
daily contact for
· enior "~hut ins" In
partoemhlp with our
TRIAD group.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
· A project to keep local
neighborhoods
infom~ed about
incidents in their area.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
OD
· Curfew Program
Working to Inform
parents and
children to gain
their cooperation.
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
Sept. 2000
75.0o%
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Business Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
Intergovern mental
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Other Revenue
Transfers
from Other Funds
Charges to Other
Departments
Sept. 2000 Y'rD PERCENT
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED
1,344,330 0 702,~.~.~ (641,886) 52.25%
4,210 10 3,515 (695) 83.49%
116,200 11,397 126,883 10,683 109.19%
963,800 1,478 493,510 (470,290) 51.20%
85,700 1,312 83,385 (2,315) 97.30%
100,000 11,884 88,740 (11,260) 88.74%
63,500 157 18,266 (45,234) 28.77%
47,500 0 0 (47,500) 0.00%
13,000 924 10,836 (2,164) 83.35%
REVENUE
2,738,240 27,162 1,527,579 (1,210,661) 55.79%
FIRE FUND
RECYCLING FUND
LIQUOR FUND
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
CEMETERY FUND
DOCK FUND
377,470 22,818 314,008 (63,462) 83.19%
115,600 6,868 104,002 (11,598) 89.97%
1,750,000 162,744 1,383,946 (366,054) 79.08%
500,000 43,497 336,889 (163,111) 67.38%
960,000 76,192 729,218 (230,782) 75.96%
6,200 0 2,930 (3,270) 47.26%
86,000 23 68,445 (17,555) 79.59%
1011612000
rev00
Gino
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
Sept. 2000
75.00%
GENERAL FUND
Council
Promotions
Cable TV
City Manager/Clerk
Elections
Assessing
Finance
Computer
Legal
Police
Civil Defense
Planning/Inspections
Streets
City Property
Parks
Summer Recreation
ontingencies
Transfers
Sept. 2000 YTD
BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE
77,620 3,406 69,600
4,000 0 4,000
26,000 (456) 18,475
198,750 15,868 148,602
12,450 834 1,628
68,000 15 71,333
175,400 14,099 131,365
22,100 186 5,786
146,980 16,087 88,515
1,049,650 61,172 744,342
12,150 917 8,504
208,250 15,144 168,397
485,990 37,165 397,331
76,890 4,328 58,045
208,050 12,632 172,021
39,570 0 0
106,780 0 650
166,120 13,843 124,590
VARIANCE
8,020
0
7,525
50,148
10,822
(3,333)
44,035
16,314
58 465
305 308
3 646
39.853
88659
18.845
36029
39 570
106 130
41,530
PERCENT
EXPENDED
89.67%
100.00%
71 .O6%
74.77%
13.08%
104.90%
74.89%
26.18%
60.22%
70.91%
69.99%
80.86%
81.76%
75.49%
82.68%
0.00%
0.61%
75.00%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3,084,750
195,240 2,213,184 871,566 71.75%
Area Fire
Service Fund 411,520
TIF 1-2 0
Recycling Fund 124,980
Liquor Fund 238,920
Water Fund 441,360
Sewer Fund 939,410
Cemetery Fund 8,190
Dock Fund 80,640
25,747 231,944 179,576 56.36%
294,029 679,465 (679,465)
14,383 81,002 43,978 64.81%
22,734 193,198 45,722 80.86%
65,354 335,113 106,247 75.93%
79,466 653,290 286,120 69.54%
1,096 5,290 2,900 64.59%
3,123 52,872 27,768 65.57%
Exp-00
10/16/2000
Gino
0 0 0 0 0 ,r-
t-
O '~ 0 c 0
~ 0 'l:: o
· C 0 .~
0 '- IL, .--
~- ~. ~. ~. LU UJ UJ LU UJ
z z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ 0 o o o o
IJ. C 0 0 0 0 0
~ E E E E E
u) M o o o o o
C
04 t~ ~1' ~r) tO
0 0 0 0 0
General Fund $912,136
CDBG 1,756
Area Fire Protection Services 279,731
MSA 21,052
Sealcoat (46,381)
PW Facility 90,833
Capital Improvement 308,597
CDB 4,123
Commerce Place TIF 167,254
Downtown TIF 1-2 (875,069)
Grant Revolving 6,759
Co Rd 15 7,783
Recycling 86,202
Liquor Store 419,202
Water 792,626
Sewer 727,038
Cemetery 2,674
Dock 253,230
Fire Relief (127,805)
HRA 1,891
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included.
A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the
independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report
will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties.
In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds
available for spending.
10118~2000
CashReportCouncil
Gino
18 Z888 14:24:41 Via Fax ->
AMM FAX
October 16-20, 2000
Hanson
Association of
Hetropolitan
Hunicipalities
State looks at takeover of education levy
In preparation forthe 2001 Legislative
Session, Revenue Commissioner
Matt Smith has conducted a series of
public meetings to discuss tax reform
measures.
While no detailed proposal has been
developed, the commissioner and staff
are conducting extensive research on
the state takeover of a larger portion of
the education levy.
The commissioner indicated that the
Department of Revenue is researching
ways to finance the takeover. Among
;earch items on the table are the
Agricultural Credit Aid
(HACA), a state levied property tax on
business and modifications to the
sales tax. The use of any available
surplus to finance takeover was not
discussed.
The use of any of the revenue
sources will have an impact on local
governments. HACA would reduce
non-property tax revenue available to
most cities. Its (HACA) loss would not
reduce the total levy but would change
a local government's reliance on the
property tax as a revenue source.
For example, the school district levy
would decrease but the county and
city levy would off~et part of the Poss.
The state property tax on business
property would decrease the total local
levy while the sales tax base broadening
could reduce the tax rate. The impact of
the sales tax on cities is dependent
upon the specifics of the proposal.
The governor will probably not
release his tax proposal until December
(at the earliest). It is expected that most
of the "Big Plan" initiatives will be
announced prior to the start of the 2001
Session on Jan. 3, 2001.
General permits possible for Phase II stormwater process
As part of federal environmental
egisiation, most public entities will
need a storm water permit issued by
its state environmental protection
agency.
Being aware that most AMM cites
are Phase II cities, AMM staff has
asked the PCA if it will develop
individual permits for each city or be
able to develop a general permit
applicable to all Phase II cities. PCA
has replied that it is interested in a
general permit process and is willing to
further explore the possibility.
If you are interested in the Phase II
process and would like to be involved in
any meetings related to the permit,
please call Laude Jennings at the AMM
(651-215-4000) to be put on the meet-
ing mailing list.
The rules governing stormwater
permits were promulgated in 1999 and
require cities having a population
between 10,000 and 100,000 to have a
Council to hold forum on utility, infrastructure
Being aware of changing policies
related to public utilities and the
projected regional growth, the Metropoli-
tan Council is sponsoring a series of
forums regarding utilities and infrastruc-
t~.lanning.
~ initial forum is set for Friday,
OLtT'_27, 2000 at the Sheraton Midway
Hotel. The forum will include a presenta-
tion by Tim Sheesley, coordinator of
Colorado 2000 and an executive with
Excel Energy. Colorado 2000 is a joint
utility planning effort between industry
and Colorado govemments. A panel of
local govemment officials, utility and
business representatives will react to
the presentation and discuss local
efforts regarding utility and infrastruc-
ture planning.
If you are interested in attending,
please call the Metropolitan Council at
651-602-1000 by Thursday, Oct. 26
for a reservation and further informa-
tion. The cost to attend the forum is
$20.
permit by 2003. In Minnesota, the
Pollution Control Agency (PCA)is
responsible for issuing the permits.
The PCA is in the process of com-
pleting the permitting of Phase I cities
(100,000 populations or more) and met
jointly with Minneapolis and St. Paul to
develop a permit forthe cities. The
proposed permit for each city is gener-
ally the same except for the identifica-
tion of specific locations.
AMM seeks street
sweeping information
The AMM is seeking street sweeping
information on behalf of a member.
The city would like to know how other
cities dispose of street sweeping debds
and if the debris is deposited at a city
owned facility, leased facility, privately
owned location or facility used by more
than one city. Also, is street sweeping
completed by the city or private con-
tractor? Please call Gene at the AMM
(6,51-21,5-4001 ) with any information.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
7:00 PM, Wednesday, October 25, 2000
Tonka Bay City Hall
.ALL TO ORDER
_3LL CALL
i-lAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Babcock
10/31/00 Annual meeting with Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol, 7:30 A.M., at the
Hennepin County Sheriff's Headquarters (Spring Park)
10/5/00 Death of past LMCD Board Member Bob Pillsbury, Minnetonka
11/8/00 and 11/22/00 are scheduled Regular Board Meetings (Staff recommends consolidating
meeting dates to 11/15/00)
---ADING OF MINUTES- 9/27/00 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
JBLiC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
5NSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion
~less a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from
agenda.
EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
A) Review of 2000 EWM Harvesting Season Summary Report;
B) (*) Minutes from the 10/13/00 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting (handout);
C) 10/13/00 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting Report;
D) Discussion of 9/21/00 letter from Hydraulic Boat Company, Inc.;
E) Additional business;
FINANCIAL
A) Audit of vouchers (10/1/00 - 10/15/00)and (10/16/00 - 10/31/00);
B) Additional Business;
LAKE USE & RECREATION
A) (*) Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol Significant Activity Report;
update on Sheriff's Water Patrol Proposal for 2001 Boating Season (handout);
C) Review of Draft 2000 Lake Minnetonka Shoreline Boat Count;
D) Additional Business;
A{~INISTRATION
A) Appointment of nominating committee for 2001 Board Officers;
B) Additional Business;
SAVE THE LAKE
A) (*) Minutes from the 10/4/00 "STL" Advisory Committee Meeting;
B) 10/4/00 "STL" Advisory Committee Meeting Report;
C) Discussion of MCWD Cynthia Krieg Watershed Stewardship Fund Application;
D) Additional Business;
WATER STRUCTURES
A) Consideration of Variance application deposit refunds, as outlined in 10/13/00 staff memo;
B) Additional Business;
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
~INESS
NEW BUSINESS
· EXECUTIVE SESSION- Performance Evaluation of Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to
conduct evaluation in closed session)
.ADJOURNMENT
D AFT
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
7:00 PM, Wednesday, September 27, 2000
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Babcock called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Gene Partyka,
Minnetrista; Andrea Ahrens, Mound; Kent Dahlen, Minnetonka Beach; Craig Eggers, Victoria; Tom Gilman,
Excelsior; Lili McMillan, Orono. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director;
Judd Harper, Administrative Technician.
Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Sheldon Wert,
Greenwood. The City of Minnetonka does not have an appointed Board member.
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Babcock
BaJi~i~k stated that he had an update on the Mound variance applications and that it would be discussed under
"k~llusiness".
READING OF MINUTES- 9/13/00 Regular Board Meetings
MOTION: Foster moved, Dahlen seconded to approve the minutes of the 9/13/00 Regular Board meeting as
submitted.
VOTE: Ayes (6), Abstained (2; Ahrens and Eggers); motion carded.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
There were no comments from the public on subjects not on the agenda.
Gilman arrived at 7:02 p.m.
1. WATER STRUCTURES
A. Mr. Steve Coddon, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of variance application from
LMCD Code for side setback requirements and an adjusted dock use area.
MOTION: Foster moved, Ahrens seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval of
vadance application from LMCD Code for side setback requirement and an adjusted dock use
area for Mr. Steve Coddon.
Babcock stated that he would oppose the motion because he did not believe the applicant has documented
sufficient hardship to store two watercraft on 22' of continuous shoreline.
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
Sel 13, 2000
Page 2
VOTE: Ayes (8), Nayes (1, Babcock); motion carded.
B. Additional business.
There was no additional business.
FINANCIAL
A. Audit of vouchers (9/16/00 - 9/30/00).
Nelson reviewed the audit of vouchers for payment as submitted.
MOTION: Foster moved, Gilman seconded to approve the audit of vouchers for payment.
VOTE: Motion carded unanimously.
B. August financial summary and balance sheet.
Nelson reviewed the August financial summary and balance sheet. He noted that expenditures in the
Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) Harvesting Program sigr, ifi.cantly exceed what was budgeted for 2000 and that
staff will address this in the 2000 Final EWM Harvesting Season Report in the near future.
MOTION: Gilman moved, Fartyka seconded [o accept the August financial summary and balance sheet as
submitted.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
LAKE USE & RECREATION
A. Discussion on date for annual meeting with the Hennepin County Shedffs Water Patrol.
Nybeck stated that he had been in contact with Lt. Schilling and that there are three possible dates to hold
this annual meeting at 7:30 a.m. in the District office. These dates are 10/9/00, 10/23/00, and 10/31/00.
The consensus of the Board was to hold the annual meeting with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water
Patrol on Tuesday, 10131100.
B. Additional Business.
stated that she would like an update on the proposal to increase Water Patrol presence on Lake
Minnetonka for the 2001 boating season.
Partyka stated that the City of Minnetrista has agreed to participate in this program on a one-year basis.
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 13, 2000
Page 3
Nybeck updated the Board on this proposal. He made the following comments:
· Minnetdsta and Wayzata have provided wdtten support to participate in this proposal on a one-year
basis. He added that Minnetonka Beach has agreed through resolution to participate in the proposal
and that the latest letter would be brought up at their next City Council meeting. He stated that
written support has been received from Tonka Bay and that verbal support has been received from
Greenwood.
· Excelsior supports the idea of additional Water Patrol presence on Lake Minnetonka for the 2001
boating season; however, they do not support the idea of shadng in the costs of the proposal. He
stated that Spdng Park is currently discussing the funding proposal in conjunction with their 2001
budget.
· Phone calls have been placed with Shorewood and Woodland and there has been no feedback from
staff in these cities. He added that further contacts need to be made with Deephaven, Minnetonka,
Mound, and Victoria on the second letter recently sent out.
Eggers stated that he would make contact with staff at the City of Victoria.
Ahrens questioned why the proposal should be further addressed by the Mound City Council.
Nybeck stated that member city participation in the proposal has changed significantly from the first letter to
the second letter. The most significant change was the proposed reduction in contribution of the member
cities to $30,000.
Foster stated that the details in the proposal are much clearer in the second letter. The current breakdown
in the proposal is 50% from Hennepin County, 30% from the LMCD member cities, and 20% from the
LMCD's "Save the Lake" fund. The LMCD has recently agreed to support the 20% commitment from the
"Save the Lake" fund through private donations.
Babcock stated that he believed a good selling point with the member cities is that every dollar they invest is
leveraged with an additional three dollars. The majority of the benefits to be received from the proposal
would be lakeshore users and residents within the member cities.
Ahrens asked if there has been discussion on what activities the additional Deputies in the proposal would
be conducting.
Foster stated ths. t he believed they would be patrolling the lake and that this is outlined in the second letter.
Ahrens stated that it would be beneficial to understand who would be controlling the activities of the
additional Deputies in the proposal. She cited speeding in the channels as an example that needs attention
of the Water Patrol.
Babcock stated that recommendations on the prioritizing of Water Patrol efforts have generally occurred at
the annual meeting, scheduled for 10/31/00. Ultimately the activities of these additional Deputies would be
the responsibility of the Water Patrol. He would like to ensure that these additional positions are dedicated
to Lake Minnetonka, with no decrease in service provided by the current Beputies.
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular goard Meeting
Se~mber13,2000
Page 4
Foster stated that the Water Patrol does not view Lake Minnetonka as being unsafe because of inadequate
law enforcement personnel. The Water Patrol views that if the member cities would like additional presence
on the lake, it needs additional funding at the local level. He would like to see the additional Water I~atrol
presence deal with quality of experience purposes in addition to public safety purposes.
Ahrens stated that she would like to see the Water Patrol enforce more regulations rather than just BWl's.
Babcock stated that he believed that the final commitment from the member cities and District might give
additional leverage on priorities to be enforced on Lake Minnetonka. He believed the discussion was
beneficial and that the additional presence of Water Patrol Deputies could serve as a deterrent.
4. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
There was no discussion.
5. ADMINISTRATION
There was no discussion.
~E THE LAKE
McMillan stated that a "Save the Lake" Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for 11:30 a.m. on 1014/00 in the
District office. She encouraged Board members to forward ideas on possible projects to be funded, noting that
she believed there is grant money available for lakescaping projects.
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Nybeck stated that the lake level as of 9/26/00 was 927.68'. He questioned whether the Board would like to
extend an invitation to a MCWB staff member to attend a future Board meeting to address projected lake levels in
the future.
The consensus of the Board was that possible Iow lake levels are issues that should be addressed in the spdng
time frame.
OLD BUSINESS
Babcock provided an update on the settlement agreement relating to vadance applications approved for the six
street ends in Mound. George Hoff, District attorney, is looking for feedback on whether the Board
would like to review the settlement agreement or whether the Board would like Hoff to review the document to
ensure that it meets the cdteria established by the Board.
Foster moved, Nelson seconded to allow Distdct attomey Hoff and Chair Babcock to review and
comment on the proposed settlement agreement pdor to sending it court.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
13, 2000
Page 5
Nybeck recommended that the Board cancel the next Regular meeting scheduled for 10/11/00.
MOTION: Foster moved, Gilman seconded to cancel the LMCD Regular Board meeting scheduled for 10111/00.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
Foster stated that the variance application submitted by Mr. Miles Canning on St. Albans Bay has been
withdrawn. He questioned how application of LMCD Code would apply to docking and boat storage in this ama
of the lake.
The Board discussed Code provisions relating to the voluntary combination or adjustment of dock use areas and
enforcement issues. No action was taken by the Board on these issues.
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Chair Babcock adjoumed the meeting at 8:20 p.m.
Douglas Babcock, Chairman
Eugene A. Partyka, Secretary
DRAFT
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Save the Lake Advisory Committee
Minutes
11:30 a.m., Wednesday, October 4, 2000
LMCD Conference Room
CALL TO ORDER.
McMillan called the meeting to order at 11:43 a.m.
PRESENT.
Lili McMillan, Chair; Marleane Callaghan, Fortin Consulting; Dick Osgood, Ecosystem Strategies; Greg Nybeck, LMCD
Executive Director; Judd Harper, LMCD Administrative Technician.
MINUTES FROM THE 4/19/00 MEETING.
The minutes from the 4/19/00 "Save the Lake" Advisory Committee meeting were accepted as submitted.
REVIEW OF LAKESCAPING PROJECTS.
McMillan overviewed the Lakescaping Workshop held at Long Lake on Saturday, 9/9/00. She stated that although the
attendance at this workshop was relatively Iow, she believed it was a good start.
Callaghan stated she concurred with McMillan that it was a good start because those that attended were interested in
~ducting a project, especially in addressing the problems associated with geese. She noted that she had visited a
pie of potential sites since the workshop.
Osgood asked Callaghan how Fortin Consulting gets involved in Lakescaping projects.
Callaghan stated that Fortin Consulting focuses on assisting the public in design and installation. She noted that they
provide hand-on assistance in the project and that they assist in secudng the proper permits from the MN DNR.
Osgood stated that he believed it would be beneficial to have a lakescaping project on the lake at a pdvate residence to
emphasize its possibilities to the public. He noted that he believed this might have more impact with the public rather
than having a project at a public site. He suggested it might be appropriate to have a second workshop sometime in the
spring of 2001.
McMillan stated that grant funds are available for lakescaping projects through the Aquatic Plant Restoration (APR)
Program in the MN DNR. She added that additional grant funds are available through the Cynthia Krieg Watershed
Stewardship Fund in the MCWD. She stated one condition to receive grant funds through the APR Program is that the
project has to be capable of being viewed by the public. She questioned whether a pdvate site would agree to this
condition. She added that she would like to be able to go to member cities and their councils with a short program that
highlight lakescaping possibilities.
Callaghan stated she believed one advantage to lakescaping at a pdvate site is that they are more diligent in maintaining
the project.
;USSION OF ZEBRA, MUSSEL PROJECTS.
McMillan stated in 2000, $10,000 was spent from the "Save the Lake" budget on zebra mussel education efforts. She
noted this included utilizing billboards in the Lake Uinnetonka area and the printing of zebra mussel posters for
placement in commercial businesses on the lake. She stated that she was unsure what was planned for 2001.
SAVE THE LAKE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, 1014/00, PAGE 2
N,v, Jaegk stated that he had been in recent contact with Herb guerth, EWM Exotics Task Force Chair. He noted that
~l~would like to re-evaluate the priorities of this program in the near future to determine what should be planned for
2001.
Harper stated that he visited most of the commercial marinas on the lake with Suerth this past spring to talk about zebra
mussels. He noted that the zebra mussel posters and other educational literature were distributed at these visits.
McMillan asked for an update from Osgood on the zebra mussel testing program conducted this summer by the Lake
Minnetonka Association (LMA).
Osgood stated that this program was conducted by the Lake Minnetonka Citizens Monitoring Program, through the LMA.
He noted that sampling was conducted at 18 different sites, on two different occasions, dudng the months of June and
July. He added that these samples were forwarded to the Minnesota Sea Grant in Duluth for further analysis of whether
veligers were present. He stated that results from these samples indicate that no veligers were found in Lake
Minnetonka at this time.
McMillan stated that approximately $500 was funded through "Save the Lake" on this project. She asked Osgood
whether he felt it should be continued in 2001.
Osgood stated he believed it should be continued in 2001. He noted he was unsure on the status of the Lake
Minnetonka Citizens Monitoring Program because its funding through the LCMR would be depleted sometime in the
near future.
y Committee talked about the article in the Star Tribune that reported that zebra mussels have been
discovered in Lake Zumbro near Rochester. Nybeck stated that a copy of this article would be forwarded for discussion
purposes in the next EWM/Exotics Task Force packet.
DISCUSSION OF MILFOIL ISSUES.
McMillan stated that she believed there are some issues for the District to address regarding fragmented milfoil along
riparian property shorelines on Lake Minnetonka. She stated that she believed some of the problems that have come to
the District's attention this past summer are examples and that they medt further research.
The Advisory Committee brainstormed ideas that could assist residents in cleaning up their shorelines. Two of these
ideas included the use of a skimmer to capture fragments before they reach the shoreline and the distribution of a list of
private harvesting companies to assist the public.
REVIEW OF ON-GOING PROJECTS
McMillan reviewed two "Save the Lake" projects that were funded in 2000 that she would like to continue for 2001. They
included:
· Continuation of the "BoatSmart" course, which was conducted by the Minnetonka Power Squadron through the
Orono Community Education Department. She noted a number of students took this course, designed for
boaters aged 12-17, and satisfied the MN DNR's education requirements for a watercraft operator's permit. She
stated that she would like to explore the idea of expanding it to other areas of Lake Minnetonka.
· Use of the Hennepin Parks "Life on Lake Minnetonka" teaching kit at local schools. She stated that she would
contact Hennepin Parks on this project and report back to the Advisory Committee.
OTHER BUSINESS
Osgood stated that he had submitted a proposal to District for consideration of hosting a workshop on the viability of
treating milfoil in lakes with the fluoddone. He noted that he believed that significant progress has been reported in
~GC~
SAVE THE LAKE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, 1014/00, PAGE 3
an on the use of fluoddone and that the timing might be right to investigate the possibility of using it, at Iow dosage
Minnesota.
Nybeck stated that this proposal would be on the agenda at the next EWM/Exotics Task Force meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Thero being no further business, UcUillan adjourned the meeting at 12:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lili McMillan, Chair
Save the Lake Advisory Committee