The URL can be used to link to this page

2000-11-28PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2000, 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PAGE 2. APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: NOVEMBER 8 RESCHEDULED MEETING 4614-461:5 *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF BILLS 4619-4640 *C. SET PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CASE # 00-64 PRELIMINARY PLAT - METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT - NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD DR AND COMMERCE DR: DEC 4 CASE # 00-65 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA - CUP - METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT - NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD DR AND COMMERCE DR: DEC 4 CASE # 00-66 ZONING AMENDMENT - METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT - NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD DR AND COMMERCE DR: DEC 4 CASE # 00-71 STREET/EASEMENT VACATION - METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT - NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD DR AND COMMERCE DR: DEC 4 5. TRUTH IN TAXATION: DEC 4 6. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FEES: DEC 4 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. o o 10. 11. 12. 13. o *D. CASE # 00-59 CUP - 1800 COMMERCE BLVD - JOHN PASTUCK: DEC 12 CASE # 00-68 PRELIMINARY PLAT XXXX CHESTNUT HILL - BRENSHELL HOMES: DEC 12 CASE g00-35 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA - CUP - CHESTNUT HILL - BRENSHELL HOMES: DEC 12 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS 46414651 1. CASE # 00-63 VARIANCE - 5395 BAYWOOD SHORES DRIVE *E. *F. ACTION ON SOLID WASTE RESOLUTION/AGREEMENT COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) ACTION ON PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION AWARD CONTRACT FOR COAST TO COAST DEMOLITION 4652 46534659 RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT 4660-4681 ACTION ON SUPPORTING DATA AND SIGNAGE RECOMMENDATION PERTAINING TO CLEAN OUTDOOR AIR 4682-4725 ACTION ON MUELLER/LANSING PROPERTIES' REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT INTO CBD PARKING PROGRAM ACTION ON ETHICS GUIDELINES CONSIDERATION OF WESTONKA SCHOOL DISTRICT CLAIM: EXECUTIVE SESSION OPEN SESSION: ACTION ON RESOLUTION REGARDING WESTONKA SCHOOL DISTRICT CLAIM CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: EXECUTIVE SESSION OPEN SESSION: ACTION ON CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, CONTRACT AND PROPOSAL INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. AMM FAX B. Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative correspondence 4733-4736 4725A 47264729 47304732 2 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C. Mound Police Department Report: October 2000 4737-463~; D. Correspondence between City and County on criminal transport 4739-4741 E. Report on most recent population estimate 4742-4743 F. Westonka Schools correspondence 4744-4745 G. Reed and Pond, LTD letter 4746 H. Metropolitan Council call for volunteers 4747-474:~ I. Financial reports through Oct 2000 4749-4754 J. Open House invitation from Hoisington Koegler Group Inc 4755 K. EDC minutes: Aug 17 and Sept 21 4756-4767 This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. cityofmound, com. Mound City Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 8, 2000 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, November 8, 2000, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Pat Meisel; Council Members: Andrea Ahrens, Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, and Leah Weycker. Also in attendance were Acting City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Fran Clark and the following interested citizens; Ken and Sally Custer, Bill and Dorothy Netka, Kevin England and Peter Meyer. *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF AIJ,EGIANt~E The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA & REGULAR AGENDA, Couneilmember Brown asked to have the Item A, the Minutes of the October 14, 2000, Regular Meeting pulled from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Weycker asked to have Item D, Morton Lane: Hasbro Co. Bioremediation Process pulled from the Consent Agenda. *CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the two remaining items on the Consent Agenda. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. *1.0 PAYMENT OF BILI$. MOTION, Hanus, Brown, unanimously. *1.1 APPROVE PLANS AND SET BID OPENING FOR MOUND COAST TO COAST DEMOLITION: 11:00 AM, NOV 22, MOTION, Hanus, Brown, unanimously. Mound City Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 L2 MINUTES: OCTOBER 24 REGULAR MEETING. Councilmember Brown stated that on page 4511, 3rd paragraph, middle sentence, should read as follows: "He stated that he was not in favor of putting more teeth in this to allow for enforcement." Councilmember Brown asked that on page 4512, paragraph 3, the last sentence be deleted and replaced with the following: "He stated there is a possibility he may have been wrong." Councilmember Weycker stated she has a change on Page 4508, fourth paragraph from the bottom should have the following sentence added to it: "We need to check out where the name Pembroke came from, because this was an issue when we named Sorbo Park." Councilmember Weycker also asked that on page 4513, it be clarified which was the vote on the motion and which was the vote on calling the question. The calling of the question came before the vote on the Resolution. MOTION made by Weycker, seconded by Brown to approve the Minutes of the October 14, 2000, Regular Meeting, as amended above. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carded. 1.3 MORTON LANE: HASBRO CO. BIOREM~.DIATION PROCESS 1, APPROVE EASEMENT AGREEMENT 2. APPROVE AGREEMENT TO TRANSFER LAND 3, APPROVE AMENDMENT TO STREET VACATIQN RESOLUTION TO: a-- CORRECT INCORRECT I.EGAL DESCRIFFION b. ACKNOWI.EDGE THAT ALL PRECONDmONS TO RECORDING THE RFSOLUTION HAVE TAKEN PLACE. Councilmember Weycker stated that she asked to have this item removed from the Consent Agenda because she did vote in favor' the original resolution and would not be voting in favor of this correction. Brown moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION//00-109 RESOLWFION TO CORRECT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESOLUTION//00-65 VACATING A PORTION OF MORTON LANE STREET RIGHT- OF-WAY, P & Z CASE//00-29 The vote was 4 in favor with Weycker voting nay. Motion carried. Kevin England was present at this meeting. 1.4 CANVASSING OF VOTE~ FROM THE MUNICWAL ELECTION. NOVEMBER 7, 2000. The following results of the November 7, 2000, Municipal Election were presented to the City Council: Mound City Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 MAYOR TOMCASEY 175 173 630 282 250 274 DAVID GREENSLIT 115 101 309 161 259 150 PAT MEISEL 236 164 552 392 417 256 1784 1095 2017 COUNCHJMEMBER ANDREA AHRENS 103 88 292 178 183 130 KIMANDERSON 185 165 612 299 288 305 ORVBURMA 91 46 328 159 214 100 JAMIF~J. DEMARAIS 49 54 103 66 98 71 PETER C. MEYER 210 173 497 269 286 291 GARY T. MOTYKA 38 46 88 122 105 73 JASIN SASANFAR 12 17 81 29 29 24 NICOLE SVEUM 41 47 120 59 75 64 BILL VOSS 144 108 408 224 272 131 974 1854 938 441 1726 472 192 406 1287 The Canvassing Board hereby certifies that election to a two year Mayoral term is Pat Meisel and two, four year Council terms are: Kim Anderson and Peter C. Meyer. Brown moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION g00-I10 RESOLUTION CERTWYING THE RESULTS OF ~ MUNICIPAL ELECTION AS PRESF. aNTED AT THE CANVASS OF VOTE OF THE NOVEMB~ 7, 2000, GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COMME~$ & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTF-$ PER SPEAKER.) There were none. 1.5 ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE EXEMPTING CERTAIN SIGNS FROM TI~, RF.~U'IREMENTS OF SECTION 365 OF THE MOUND CODE The City Attorney explained that the current code outlaws all signs in Mound unless they come within a specific exemption to the ordinance. Recently, the City received an application from a property owner to install signs on private property that regulated parking in a private parking lot and Staff was reviewing it to determine if it was a request for a sign permit. It was the result of that review that prompted the proposed ordinance amendment in front of the City Council tonight which would exempt this type of sign from needing a permit. Staff has recommended approval. 3 Mound City Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 Hanus moved and Weycker seconded the following: ORDINANCE//113-2000 AN ORDINANCE EXEMlrflNG CERTAIN SIGNS FROM THE REQUIREME~ OF SECTION 356 OF ~ MOUND CITY CODE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.6 STAFF REPORT ON ACTIVITW~ WITH MINNEHAHA WATERSHED DISTRICT AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. Dan Parks of MFRA reviewed his memo date November 2, 2000, regarding thc Mound SWMP (Storm Water Management Plan) - Wetland Buffer Language. The City Council discussed Mr. Park's memo. They asked to have the word "require" changed to "encourage". They also asked how the Watershed District defines "major development proposal". The Council discussed buffer widths. Thc Council reviewed Staff's suggested buffer language as follows: "The City will require natural, unmaintained wetland buffers around existing wetlands or replacement wetlands in major development proposals. The buffer shall be a native, unmaintained vegetative strip planted with legumes or other perennial plant materials. Buffer widths will be based on the size of the abutting wetland as shown on Table 6 below. In addition, the City will encourage the placement of 20 foot natural buffers around all City lakes, wetlands and waterbodies." After discussion the Council asked that the following amendment to the above be used. "The City will require encourage natural, ",,nm~:,~n'~:,,~n~ wetland buffers around existing wetlands or replacement wetlands in major development proposals. The egetafi trip buffer shall be a native, ~ v ves · ..... :.~ _1.~, -.,~-:-~- Buffer widths will be based on the size of the abutting wetland as shown on Table 6 below. In ~"":':~- '"~ '~:" .... :" .......... "~ Mr. Park's pointed out that he feels the Watershed District will insist on the word "require" instead of "encourage". Mr. Parks also added that he will look at the Mound City Code that shows the difference between a minor and major subdivision and would include that in the City's proposal which would address the major development proposal question that was asked earlier. There was considerable discussion on the wetland buffers widths. Mr. Parks advised the City Council that the Watershed District is now undertaking an effort to do the functions and values of the wetlands starting out with four communities and Mound 4 Mound City Council Minutes - Nov~ber 8, 2000 is one of their primary communities. If the City had to do the functions and values of the wetlands it would cost between $15,000 and $20,000. That will relieve Mound 0f the responsibility to do this. Mr. Parks suggested taking the data from the functions and values assessment of Mound wetlands to determine how each of these wetlands are working in the eeo system and then determine a buffer and perhaps a larger management plan to preserve and protect those wetlands for whatever they are best suited for. Mr. Parks thought the functions and values assessment would be done sometime in early 2001 and we could wait for that and then revisit the wetlands in the City and determine buffers at that time. MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Brown to submit "The City will ~ encourage natural, ~ wetland buffers around existing wetlands or replacement wetlands in major development proposals. The buffer mall be a native, ..... '~:....ncd vegetative strip. -'~-'~-:'~' ~ ...... '~' ' ~ ' ' ' ' ~ Average Buffer widths will be based on the size of the abutting wetland as shown on Table 6 below Also included in the motion is changing Table 6 to 50%, plus or minus. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. LMCD report. B. LMCC report. C. Westonka Senior Center report. D. AMM FAX News. E. Westonka Public School communications. F. Planning Commission minutes: Oct 23. G. Article: How to Become a Better Governing Board Member. H. Article: Your Minutes Should Not be a Blow-by-Blow Account. I. Analysis of the cost for one-day leaf drop-off. J. TRAC Correspondence. MOTION made by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 8:20 P.M. The vote was nnanlmously in favor. Motion carried. Kandis Hanson, City Manager Attest: City Clerk PAYMEN'i' BILLS DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2000 BILI,S ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BATCI 1 # #0111 AMOUNT $217,184.27 TOTAL BILLS $217,184.27 PAGE 1 AP-C02-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CiTY OF MOUND VENDUR i rJVO I CE __ ND._ _I.];VOI CF_. I¢MbP. .... OATS. DUE HOLD dATE _q T ATL.IS A~'"rJL]f;T DE-S>~-PI-I.q~4 .................. ACC-OUI,~T NUM6ER -_ A0333 001023 257.79 10-00 GASOLINE CHARGES 73-7300-2210 2~5~]-9--- ~JR.NL-C D .... 1010 A,":uCU OIL COMPANY VE',~DO~. TOTAL AO33b 88,,3 i'L /2&/O0 l!/2b/O0 A:'CO!': CO~Mu~ICATIOt, S, I,',;C. V£;,;L~OR TOTAL 257.79 i42.90 PAGER 22-4170-3200 142.90 JRNL-C~ 1010 142.V0 -~.~.~l ~ 25213 11/2~/00 11/28/00 72_L'0 REACEA'--~OGK-ON GAT~-JN GARAGE ...... 01-4320-35~0 ....... 72.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ASSU~ED SECUi~ITY ......... V~. ~J g._q r~ TriTe,L A0480 066139 109.00 Oi-O1-G1 THRu 01-01-02 RENEW 73-7300-4130 !0g:00 JR4~L"C D ............. lUt0- AMERICAN WATERWOkKS ASSOC VE~<DOR TOTAL 11/28/00 il/2&/00 109.00 §64.00 LIQUOR 664.00 JRNL-CD 11/28/00 11/2~/00 ll/2~/OO 11/2~/90 li/2E/O0 11/28/0C 11/28/00 11126/00 19950200 19V57300 20u61200 20066400 20119700 325856UO li/25/00 11/28/00 32a~5700 1i/28/00 1!/2c/00 32555800 ii/2s/oo ii/~:/oo 6ELLbOY CORPORATI Oh v~;DOL- .~Q567 1916c, 7 425.00 LIQUOR 425.00 JRNL-CD 2,936.I9 LIQUOR 2,936.i9 J~NL-CD 40.24 HIX 40.24 JRNL-CD 4,200.90 LI~UO? ~,20~.90 JRNL-C& 263.22 BA~S 263.22 JRNL-CD i3~.97 BAGS 13&.97 JRNL-CD 43.93 MISCELLAENOUS 43.93 JRNL-CD 8715.45 11/2S/00 i1/2B/DD .......... ZO.O0 17.50 COFFEE 17.50 COFFEE JRi~L-CD 71-7100-9510 1010 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-71o0-o540 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-2200 1010 71-7100-2200 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 01-4020-4120 01-4190-4120 01-4340-4120 1010 3ERkY COFFF,E COMPANY VENDO~ TOTAL B0572 0040405297 11/28/00 £I/Z%X.00 70.00 95.82 VACUUM l&9.09 VACUUM 244~91 JRNL-C[~ 01-4140-2200 01-4340-2330 1010 PAGE AP-C02-OZ VENDOR __NO~ .INVOICE Nx~R INVOICE ')dE HOLD PO R C HA SE CITY OF MOUND J 0 L' R N A L ACCOUNT NUMBER ___~E,ST BUY COMPANY BO600 10953320 11/28/0u ll/2b/O0 10063330 10063304 i0063258 BLAC~O~IAK AND SON OOllO o io 7 508 ~INKLE~ BOTO °611os 1i/2~/00 11/28/00 i~/28/00 11/28/00 11/2~/00 I1/2b/O0 VENDOR TOTAL 11128/00 ll/2&/O0 ll/28/O.O-d~.Y2&/o~ VENDOR TOTAL SRASLAU, DAVID A[.,D AoSOCi$ VENDOR TOTAL 2A 4 .-9.1 ...... 31.66 10-00 GARAdGE PICKUP 3i.~6 lg--O-~ -GAkA.J. GF. P I CKUP 31.07 10-00 GARAJGE PICKUP 94.99 JRNL-{D 67.GZ 10-00 6AF~AGE oICKUP 67.01 JPNL-CD 7~,.90 10-00 .SAR~!AGE PICKUP 78.90 JRNL-CD 17.76 10-00 SAR~AGE PICKUP 17.76 JRNL-CD 25~ .66 9D-l~..~Z---1-O-26,11-e7,II-O& DELIVERY CmA 901.47 10-26,11-07,11-06 DELIVERY CmA 1,~02.94 JRNL-CD 436.30 10-25,10-27 DELIVERY CdARGES 43o.30 10-25,10-27 DELIVERY CHARGES 2675.5~ 7,142.70 THRU 11-03-00 LYNWOOD/15 ALIGN 7,142.70 JRNL-CO 71~2.70 01-C280-3750 75-7300-3750 78-7700-3750 lOlO 22-4170-~750 lOlO 01-4340-3750 1010 7!-710D-3750 lOlO 73-730o-2340 76-7800-2340 1010 73-7300-2340 78-7800-2340 iOlO 55-5877-3100 1010 ~O_7_4~_PQ7HNOZTiI3D 11/28/00 1112~/00 _BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE .NE~U~SB lnTAL C0820 20bg13~2 ll / 26J O_~_LiJ2 S ~nn CARGILL SALT DIVISION VENDOR TOTAL C0~59 D60309 060-334 CHAMPION AUTo 630=00 JULJL~A-UG~S£PI,2000 CJDN - 01-4140-3600 630.00 JRNL-CD 1010 __ C0~81 10276947 CHIEF SUPPLY &l~.~6 ll-O8-OG ICE 01-4280-234u ~!~_O-6-JRNL-C~ - lOiO TRAILER HITCH 01-4340-3&10 JRNL-CD 1010 DRIP FAK 01-4340-2200 JRNL-CD iOlO 816.06 27.6~ 1t/2~/00 ll/2&/OO 27.68 8.51 11/28/00 ii/2b/O0 g.5I V~NDC)R TOTAL 36.19 2_~5_52.._LRTE STICK GREEN 01-4140-227G 245.52 JRNL-CD 1010 _245.52 VENDDRJ_g_T_~L_ PAGE AP-C02-01 VENDOR .... NO. I~VOiCE NMBR IKVOICE DUE HOLD DAI E____~.A T F % T~,T~q PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF ,'q,f)UND A '" 0 Ill J-__. gE S C ;( I.P T C0905 01312000 CITY OF CHANHASSEI~ __C0930 167949 __CI~Y~IDE WINDO~ C0960 001031 11128/00 !I/PE/OO VENDOR TOTAL 11)Zs/oo 11/z~,/oo DE,VI CES v ~ N,q. ,q R T~TAI_ 11~'20/00 11/2~/00 1~241,00 .-1998 WAFTA 1,241.00 1990 WAFTA 2,~2.00 JCqL-CG 2482.00 lY-57 10-01-00 THRU 17.57 JR.~L-CD t7=57 ............ 12-~0-00 CLFAN cg~$~.._TO COAST C0970 61381153 61370813 TOTAl 11/28/00 _lJJ.~/00 ..1. l LPg_/_0 o !1/27{/00 61392172 11 / 28 / COCA COLA bOTTLIKG-MiDNEST VE~IbOk TOTAL C09~0 001113 ll/Pf/O0 ll/P&/O0 1~4.02 THRU 10-31-00 ~ISC SUPPLIES 102.4~__INRJJ..IO-31-O0 MISC SUPPLIES ~4.o6 THRU 10-31-00 MISC SUPPLIES &4.69 THRU 10-31-00 :~ISC SUPPLIES ll2_a~ T~U-IO-~i-OO MISC SUPPLIES 20.43 THRU 10-$1-00 MISC SUPPLIES 51.85 THRU I0-~1-00 ~ISC SUPPLIES __LS_-g_9__I~RU .10-31-00 ~ISC SUPPLIES 1!9.47 THRU 10-31-00 HISC SUPPLIES 10.08 THRU 10-31-00 ~ISC SUPPLIES 4~_79 THRU._ZO-~I-O~_~ISC_S~PP. LIES 31.94 THRU 10-31-00 MISC SUPPLIES 56.74 THRU i0-31-00 MISC SUPPLIES I O_8__Z_9__~H_RU 10-31-00 MISC SUPPLIES 885.~0 JRNL-CD 97.20 MiX TAXABLE 92~20._ JRNL-CD 109.44 MIX TAXABLE 109_44_ _JRNL~[.~ ......... 187.28 MiX TAXABLE __]_B~Z. 2& JRNL-CD 393.92 39.37 REIMBURSEMENT 39.37 JRNL-CD CONFERENCE/SEMIN COLLETTE RO,~ERTS V~_NDOR TOTAL 39.37 ~_~lO19 1391 - 5B_7_.O_~.__RfMOVE D~PGT D~CF. ll/PS/00 ~/28/00 507.00 J~NL-CU CONCEPT LANDSCAPING, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 507,00 C1020 001231 325.75 12-00 PRINCIPLE TR~E VALUE ~3~-~6_-~-00 INTEREST TRUE VALUE 11/28/00-11/2~/00-- 961.64 JRNL-CD CONCO, INCORPORATED ._ ~FNDOR TOTAl 9~34 ..... ACCuUNT NUMY, ER 22-4170-4130 22-4170-4130 1310 71-7100-9550 1010 73-7300-2200 01-4280-2250 73-7300-2250 78-7800-2250 76-7800-2200 71-7100-3~30 01-2300-0500 01-4320-2300 01-4340-2310 01-4340-2200 01-4320-2~00 73-7300-2310 01-4340-230~ 22-4170-2200 1010 71-7100-0540 1010 71-7100-0540 ...... 1010- 71-7100-9540 lOlU 01-4090-4110 10!0 01-4340-3800 1010 55-5881-6100 55-5861-6110 1010 PAGE 4 P U R C H A S E J 0 d R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF VENDOR iNvOiCE OuE HOLD ___NO~_.INVOICE NM JR_.. ~%AT_E__I L,~TE ST.'-.T']S A~!JUNT DESCR~m$IO~,~ ACCOUNT NUM6ER __CliO400ilO3 . 4~9-~,00---.~0-00 PROFESSIONAL SEDVICFS 01-4110-3120 1t/2~/00 i1/2~/00 4,930.00 JRNL-CD 1010 0HAD~ICK A~4D ME~TZ, P~_ VE':~['~ TOTAL 4930_00 ........... Dl172 D1172 ~20.00 FACEPIECE, LENS, ETC 22-4170-2200 .... tl/2~/00_~1Y2-5-!00 1~2(L.D~- JRNL-CD 1010 DAN~O EMERSENCY EQUIPMENT VE,~DO~ TOTAL 120.00 O1200 114314 1,212.95 BEER 71-7100-9530 I1/25/00 11/25/00 1,212.95 JRNL-C~ 1C10 ll50Z1 805.45 BEER 71-7100-9530 ii/2S/O0 ll/2b/O0 aO5.A5 JRIiL-CD 1010 115034 78.05 MISCELLANEOUS NON-TAXAbLE 71-7100-9550 1i/25/00 ll/2o/OO 76.05 JRNL-CD lOlO 115739 303.50 BEER 71-7100-9530 ll/2B/Ou il/28/00 303.S0 JRNL-CD 1010 DISTRIBUTING COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 2399.95 001020 ?H-DL_~HRU i0.-20-00 LP GAS 01-~280-2210 11/28/00 1l/2~/00 78.00 J~NL-CD 1010 001021 31.i6 EL~CII]N_R£NI.AL 01-~060-2200 ~i/2E/O0 11/28/00 31.16 JRNL-CD 1010 _ DUANE'S 66 SERVICE El~20 703845 .... ~£N.DO R TO-T A I 1-0 9~.t6 ........ 70.00 ~EER 71-7100-9530 705430 11/2~/00_ 5,855.30 BEER 5~. &S.S~30__ JR.,IL-CD 705431 57.40 MISCELLANEOUS T~XA~LE ...... 11/25/OD_ ~ ~ /2 ~_fl O 5_7_._~,-0__ JR~.~L-CD 706752 76.00 BEER KEGS 11/28/00 _li/?gAgO Zb~_OD_ JRNL-C~ CERTIFICATES, SEALS, FTC JRNL-CS CASE, HANDLES, ETC JRNL-CD 70d387 2,025.70 BEER ....... 1~125A00_1~/2~1~fl 2~23-7~__ JRNL-Cb . EAST SIDE BEvErAgE VENDOR TOTAL 8090.~0 Ei~89 443559 ................. S~.Oo 1Z/2~/Ou 1112:100 60.0~ 444253 71.42 11/2B/00 11/25/00 71.42 71-7100-9530 1010 71-7100-955G 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 71-7100-953~ 1010 01-4060-2200 1010 01-4060-2200 101o PAGE 5 AP-Co2-01 VENDUR INVOICE DoE HOLD __,NO. IqVOICE NMi~R DA.Ti______D3, TE qTATHq ESS (ELECTION EGUIPMENT) VENDOR TOTAL ---~i~o cc~o~ ESS B~OS AND SONS INC VEF;DDR TOTAL . E151S 1553 ll/26/OG Ii/2o/on E-~_]<ECYCLING IHC ...... vF,~hn~ T~TA[ Fl571 45319 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASS;~ uF H VENDOR TOTAL FlOOi 551976 Ii/2b/OO i1/25/O0 FIRSTAR TRUSI COHPArJY VENDSF~ IOTAL Flb4~ 13317 11/28/00 i1/2~/00 __E[AHERTY'5 HAPPY TYZ5 ..... ~D~R T~TAt Fl710 001024 FRANCENE CLARK ' 'Gi?50 469092 TOTAL PURCHASE CITY OF ~gUND J 0 U ~, N A L 137.5i 389.26 SUPER GLUE, ETC. 389.26 JmNL-CD 3§9.26 6,?~--]$---10-00 CUR~SIDE RECYCLING 6,779.35 JRNL-CD AT?Q_~5 ....... 277.29 BLDG CODES, FIRE CODES, ETC. 277.29 -~JRJ~4_-C~-- ADMIN SERVICES CHARGES JRNL-CD ACCGUNT NdHdER 277.29 258.38 268.38 266.3~ 2n~:!n 203.10 PN~, 47.55 47.55 24 24.76 78-7800-2.300 1010 70-4270-4200 lO1g 22-4170-2280 1010 475193 G & K SERVICES ~1800 49~10 49557 49624 54-5600-612 U 1i/2~/00 il/2c/00 ~ T.~Ci~L4_.A-NE 'J U S TAXA-~LE .... 71-710.0-9550 JRNL-CD 1010 08-25-00 THRU 09-24-00 CELL PH J P.~'~-L ---C S ................ 11-07-00 UNIFORMS 11-07-00 UNIFORMS 01-4040-3220 lOlu 01-4280-2240 73-7300-2240 !!-OZ~_~O]J~4.I£~RMS ........ 78-7800-2240. - 11.61 11-07-00 ~ATS 01-4250-2250 11.61 11-07-00 MATS 73-7300-2250 ~!~a~_.~1~07-0C tIATS 78-7800-2250 109.12 JRNL-CD 1010 21.1g_ Zlml4-00_MATS 71-7100-4210 21.18 JRNL-C9 1Gl0 V£~DOR _IO~T A~__ 130.30 7~-7800-3510 1GlO 01-4280-3~10 1010 01-4280-3510 lolO 73-7300-3~10 lOlU 15~.43 ALUMINU~ w~EEL Z.5_~L.~3_JENL-CD 15.98 WHEEL !1/28/00 I1AZ~/O0 ......... !5_.98_ JRNL-CD 17.70 FILTER __i?~LO__ JF24L-CD 223.45 SHOE KIT, ETC 2.2.3~5 JRNL-CD PAGE 6 AP-CO2-01 VENDOR iNvoicE DUE HOLD ____NO. INVOICE NH,~R uAT,2_____DAT~ '-,TAT:~q U ~, C HA CITY A~.~Fillh[I~__ -D£$C~I.P T IDN J o u ACCOUNT NUMBER .... 49o43 11/25/00 ll/2b/00 51,31_34TTINGS, £TC 51.31 JR;iL-CD ___~ARY'S DIESEL S£RViCi ........ ~-_',;,_'.flq TqTAL Gl&86 001107 299.04 RE I MBURSE'~ENT COHDUTER 29~_04 -JRNL-CD GINO BUSINARO G1 9o 01O 1-A V~NDOR IOTAL ll/28Zqn 1] /2&/gO 299.04 4~.55 10-00 ~ATER #5158500 ~C.55 i0-00 uATE~ #515~500 O01051-g 33.65 10-00 ~ATER ~515~501 ~.65 _.JR'~LL~.C~ 00i031-C O0 3Z-D- GLEN~OOD INGLE~OOD 11/25/00 11/2~/00 12.95 10-00 wATER ~515~502 12~95__10-00 NATER #5153502 12.95 i0-00 wATER ~515~5~2 3~.65 JRNL-CD 56.56 10-00 WATER 11/28/00 11/28/00 56.56 JRNL-CD VENDOR TOTAL 21e.16 . ~972__290682 11/28/00 11/2~/00 523.27 NLi2~_~_ ....... 523.27 JRNL-CU 291726 11/2g/00 ll/2b/O0 2~ABO.16__ LiqUOR 2,480.16 JRNL-CD 2~5853 11128/00 11/2:~/00 1,O80.14 Wj';E ___ _ 1,080.14 JRNL-CD 294550 11125>00 !1/2~/00 229_ 14Z_._ Li uUOR 229.13 JRNL-CD 290055 11128/00 11/2~/00 ~4~.25__Hi.SCELLAENOUS ~.75 JRNL-CD 297095 L, 411.~._ WINE 1.4!1.68 JDNL-CD __ _ 2970~6 11128/00 il/2b/O0 2~.50__ _wIkE 29.50 JRNL-CD 297097 11/2~/00 ............. J14.65 wINE ii/2~/00 514.35 JR NL-CL', __ 297998 lz}2L6o 11/2 /oo 2~i_ _Li 265.81 JRNL-CD ..... 29~199 WINE . 01-4280-3,al 0 1010 01-~095-3800 lOlO 01-4020-2200 01-4140-2200 1010 01-4320-2200 i310 01-4280-2200 73-7300-2200 78-7800-2200 1010 22-4170-4100 1010 71-7100-9520 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9520 - 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 71-7100-9520 10!0 71-7100-952~ 1010 71-7100-9520 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9520 PAGE 7 AP-C02-0i VFNDOR InVOiCE DJE MOLD ---.~0._ iNV01C~ NN~R ~T~ DLTE ~TAT2S 11/28/00 11/2~/00 GRIGGS CUOPER ~ CO~PA~Y VE!;DOR TOTAL _ G T E MINNESOTA d2010 001107 __.BANSON, KANDIS H2U61 301600 11/28/00 11/2~/00 .... ~FL'D3P TnTA! 11125/00 11/25/00 V~NDQR ThTA~ PURCHASE CITY OF MOJND 30o.$0 JRNL-CD 6dAO.U9 13-.J;5--J~kU 1-1-10-00 17.95 JRNL-CD !~-~ ............ 1£122~l_0/1 11/?h/oq ...... 11 / 26/.0 O_]..l/2 n AO 0 HAWKINS ~ATER TREATMENT VENDDR TOTAL H2075 6~56~1 ' .... 11/231.0~ 11/22~/_[L0 HEALTHCOMP EVAULATION SEk~: VENDOR TOTAL 2;1;2o. .2o o 11 2 ,oo 28197 11/2E/00 !1/2~/00 HECKSEL ~tACHINE-~HOP VENDOR TOTAL _ H2135 20107030 J 0 U R K A ,% 72-0646 ACCOUNT NUMBER 1010 01-~340-3220 lul0 40.00 HRGI ~FETING,ETC 01-4040-4120 520.6; Cn:~F~EENCE,..C-I:,CI;,';~ATI OH 01-402.0-4100 572.~8 JRNL-CD 1010 __dE~NFP.I~ CTY. INFO H2151 001102 1i/23/0G il/2~/00 TECid__ VEt:nn=, TnT*L R72_68 HYDROFLUOSILIC ACID. ETC. 73-7300-226G gR~U..-CO ................ 10.LO 634.31 654.31 10.00 CHARGE FOR TWO CONTAINERS 73-7300-2260 ]..O.~O__ J~NL~C~.. . 1010 644.31 38.00 i0-io-00 DRUG TEST 01-4280-3140 38.00 10-16-00 DRUG TEST 73~7300-314r 7zk. D~---J~NL-CD ........ 1~ 76.00 11/28/0~ ilY2EYD.O HENNEPIN COU,,TY TRLASU~ER VZ!,;DOR TOTAL 103.75 I2309 23785862 535.38 ll/2~/0O 11128/00 535.33 IKON OFFICE 50LLITIO'~5 VEi';~DR-TOTAL 535.38 11} B/oo 11/Z /oo 126.20 MISCELLANEOUS STEEL 78-7800-4200 126.20 JRNL-CD 1010 ~2.50 ~ELD ALUHINUH 7~-7800-&200 42.50 JRHL-CD 1010 168.70 3.5_..8.5__ 1O~00 NETwOR~ SUPPORT 01-4095-3800 35.85 JRNL-CD I010 ~5-.&.5-- ............. 103.75 PROPERTY LABELS 55-5881-3100 -L03~75- . JRNL-CD 1010 12-01-00 THRJ 12-01-01 FAX 01-4320-3500 JRNL-CD 1010 240_.3.6~ GA.S_~O.N/TOR 7b-7800-2300 240.76 J~NL-CD 1010 .. 001651 53.84 METAL FLAGS 73-7300-23n0 PAGF. 5 P O R C H A S E. J O U ~, :,~ A L AP-C02-01 CI1Y OF MUUND VE~,DOR INVOICE DUE ,HOLD ~'10~ iNVOIC£ I,~HgR _ .DATE _ !)~TF %T~,T[Iq A~OIINT _~ESC~{~.PTIDN 001215 INFRATECH I23~0 001106 11128/00 11725/00 55.84 JRNL-CD 66.20 t3LUE ~AF',KI~,~G PAINT 6~.20 6~£EN :'.~RKI~,'$ PAINT VENDOR TOTAL 433.00 25.00 200I ;~E'~BEKSh IP 11/28/0~ li/2d/O0 25.00 JP, NL-{ D INTERNATL CONFRNC 5LDG OF~ VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 __~L237.0 001114 _~L, LT.E R N A T L CITY/C~;TY 12400 6364 ISLAND PAR~ SKELLY ..... 7¢'-i179714 118034~ 11~0349 lldO35U 11~3023 11d3024 11~5912 11~5913 11~5¥1~ 1185915 11/25/00 ii/2~/00 5~,~6~ .... 01-01-01 THRU 12-31-01 544.50 JRI, L-CD 5LL_50 ........... lllgg/0 C~ - i~/-Z-~-~7-Oj] 33.84 CHARGER 3.1..~4-. -JR :~L-C D VENDO[< TOTAL 33.64 835.60 wINE 11/28/00 11/28/00 ~38.80 JRNL-CD 1,156.90 LIQUOR ll/2E/00 Ii/25/00 1,158.90 JRNL-C~ 11/28/00 11128/00 2,121.20 WINE 2,121.20 JRNL-CD 443.90 LIQUOR 443.90 JR~L-CS 11/2~/00 ll/2b/O0 ll/2g/O0 il/2b/O0 362.95 wINE 362.95 JRNL-CD 2,722.40 L!QUOR 2,722.40 JR~L-CD 1,152.65 wINE 1,i52.65 J~NL-CD 964.85 LI.~UO? 964.85 JP~;L-CJ 723.v0 wINE 723.90 J°NL-CD 3,7c7 ?~ .Jo LICUO~ 3,797.32 J~HL-CS 1,629.95 wINE 1,629.95 JRNL-C0 li/2o/GO ll/2E/O0 1112%/00 ii/23/00 11/28/00 I1/2~/00 11/25/00 11/2~/00 ACCOUNT NUMDER 101o 73-7300-2300 7~-7800-2300 - 1GlO 01-4190-A130 1010 01-4040-4130 01-4340-3B10 1010 71-7100-9520 !010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9520 lOlO 71-7100-~510 1010 71-7100-9520 1010 71-7100-9510 1510 71-7100-9520 1010 71-7i00-9510 ltlO 71-7100-9520 lOlO 71-7109-9510 1010 71-7100-9520 1010 PAGE 9 AP-C02-~}i VENDOR iNVOICE DBE H~LD .... NO. INVOiCF NP, SR DATE }xTE ST~T.]S JOHNSON ~RUTHERS LIQdOR VENDOR TOTAL --' J258~ 001231 JOHNSON, PdYLLIS JON SUTHE'RLAND J2600 001103 JO~£1.NELSON J2610 001009 001016 001031 JUBILEE FOODS L2811 11430 11432 11445 tlw17 LARSGN P~INTING 12d22 1416741 _.LAWSON Pi<ODUC TS, PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF HOUN[, AH O-U~,~T--__OE SC~.I P T I ON l£125ZI1Lu!!/2m/O0 15916.82 119.12 12-00 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE S49.99 12-00 I+~TE~EST TRUE V&LUE o69~.kl .iP--NL--~) ............ VENDOR TOTAL 669.11 11/28/00 11/2~/00 457.33 467.33 VENDOR TOTAL 467.33 ACCOUNT NUMBER 11/2&/00 11125/00 55-58~1-6100 55-5881-6110 1010 V:NPr~? TOTAl REIM~URSE"ENT ICBO CJNFEREI, CE 01-4190-4110 JRNLIC~ lolO I1/2~/0.0 ll/~5J_O]) __ 52~.6LREIMBURSEMENT MILEAGE 70-4270-4120 51.67 JRNL-Cb lOlu 5t.~7 ll/2&ZO0 ll/~L/~_0 67.13 DINNERS 01-4020-4100 .61...1.3_ JRNL-C.D 1010 VENDOR TOTAL 46.05 DINNERS 01-4020-4100 46.(Z5 JRNI "_CD ............................ 1010 . 11/28/00 11/25/00 7.98 PAPER PRODUCTS 01-4020-410C 7..9£_ JRNL-CD. 10~, 11/28/00 11125/00 121.16 11125/00 ll/2a/00 1,775.48 QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER 01-4020-3500 1,776.48 JRNL-CD lOlO 181.59 E~'~VELOPES 22-4170-3500 18.1.59 JRNL-CD 1010 42.74 BUSINESS CARDS 01-4040-2200 ~2.74 J~NL-CD lul0 LETTEPHEAD, ENVELOPES LETTER'~ ~ ,~A~, ENVELOPES £ESTERH£AD.~ ENVELOPES LETTERHEAd, ENVELOPES LETTERHEAD, ENVELOPES .LETTERHEAD, ENVELOPES LETTERHEAD, ENVELOPES LETTERHEAD, ENVELOPES JR~L-C~- 01-4040-2100 01-4090-2100 01-4190-2100 01-4340-2100 01-4280-2100 71-7100-2100 73-7300-2100 78-7800-2100 lOlO 01-42~0-2250 73-7300-2250 7b-7800-2250 1010 liISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES wISCELL~NEOUS SLIPOLIES i~2.91~- H~$C£LLANEuUS SUPPLIES ~98.75 JWNL-CD 136.o7 136.67 _ _ 1~h.6_7___ 13o.67 55.74 55,74_ 75.99 75.98 Z.t/2g/0~_ ~!/P~/00 - 810.13 GRAPHICS VENDOm TOTAL 2~12.94 i32.g2 132.92 11/2s)00 11/2~1oo 10 AP-C02-OZ P U R C HA SE J 0 U .q N A L CITY OF MOUNu VENDOR I NVC ! CF .___]~0._ iNVOIC[ N.hoR . DALi-- DuE ,-tOLD bAT~ :',TAT'IS A v 0 U !di_~E_S_Ci~I ? I 13 N ~ ACCOU,~T NuMDER ___L290 0 69o0 1i/2~/00 ll/2t/O0 J..83.6.0.__ PROCEDURE SET, ETC. 01-4040-4170 187.00 J~NL-CD 1010 LQCAL 60VERNEEhT IKST]IUIE V%N:~Qk TnTAL L2930 5-504922 __ _ 1l/2&/O~__~2~/n~ LOWELL'S AUTuMuTiVE/ZITCO~ VENDOR TOTAL M3010 ~316 8336 -- ~350- 8371 83d3 ~404 ...... ~4i7 8439 -'-MARLIN'S TRUCKING .... ~Jl.70 0000715134 11/25/00 ll/2h/O0 i07. 11/25/00 II/2&/OD i07.bO 11/2~/00 iI/2~/00 122.50 ll/2g/O0 !i/2S/O0 122.50 10.50 11/28/00 11/2~/00 10.50 126.7~ 11/28/00 ll/2~/OO 12~.70 19.~0 1i/28/00 11/2~/00 19.60 li/28/00 11128/00 1i/2g/00 11125/00 VENDOR TOTAL 1!/2~/00 11125/00 01-4140-3010 10]0 18.40 WASHER PU~'P l&.40 --JRNL-CD 16.40 17.50 10-16-00 DELIVERY CHAqGE 71-7100-9600 17.50 JRNL-/D 1010 60 10-18-00 D~LIVERY CHAC;L:E 71-7100-9000 JRNL-CD 1010 9.10 10-26-00 9ELIVERY CHAPGE 71-7100-0600 9.10 JRNL-CD 1010 10-26-00 D~LIVERY CHAR,SE 71-7100-9600 JRNL-CD 1010 10-30-00 DELIVERY CHAR'SE 71-7100-9600 JRNL-CD iOlO 11-02-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9600 11-06-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7109-9000 JRNL-CD 1010 155.20 11-09-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9600 15~.20 JRNL-CD 1010 26.70 11-13-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9500 28.70 JqNL-CD 1010 000.60 33-,-t~ ~,~ ..... 12-00 WASTEWATER 78-7800-4230 33,308.00 JRNL-CD 1ClO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVI* V£NDOZi_JDLAL .... 33108.00 ..... 11/2~/00 11/2~/00.~ 75.26 09-19-00 THPU 10-17-30 01-4340-3720 3L.2E__~9~lD-OD TdRU 10-17-00 01-4340-3720 3~.23 09-19-OD TmPU i0-I7-00 71-7100-3720 i70.79 09-19-00 THRU !0-17-00 22-4170-3720 557.00 09-19-00 THRJ 10-17-00 01-4320-3720 23.94 09-19-00 THRu iO-iT-O0 01-4280-372~ 23.94 09-19-00 THRU i0-I?-00 73-7300-3720 2~-95__.09--1~-00 THRU 16-17-00 78-7800-3720 956.39 JRNL-CD 1010 M3250 001031 MI NNEGASCO · V.E N DO P~T_D_I A L 95~.39._. PAGE 21 P U R C H A S E AP-Co2-01 CITY OF mOuNd VENDOR t !.;VOl CE DUE HOLD .... ~'~. iHVOIC£ NM.,R DAI'4___ ~--TE STAT',Jc] ~,JZ.o.LikI_._ ~)E~CR]P T I 3 JOURNAL ACCOUNT NUH6ER _-~3255 001030 26~1_.56--.-C0:;D FAN HOTOR li/Z8/O0 11/2S/00 261.56 JPNL-CO MIN:~F..TONkA R~FkIGERAT. I~_ vEuDO~< TOTAL 2~ ............. M3290 61AO 6.33 FORFEITURE FUR:~S MN COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSR VE~',DOR TOTAL 6.33 M3320 001231 20.00 ~ETAILER 11/28/00 11/25/00 20.00 JRNL-CD MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 · H Z~47_6 47~071 .__mONROE TRUCK M3490 001031 11/28/00 11/23/00 E~UIPME~T -- -V~?R TOIJ~L 11/28/00 11/2~/00 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT VENDOR TOTAL _~146 1050-B 11/28/00 i1/28/00 .NICCUM DOCKS, iNC. ~3800 001031 ._ O0i031-B NORTHERN STATES P395~ OOu 5~, PAGENET OF MINNESOTA 1±/2~/00 I1/2~/00 ii/2S/Cu 11/2~/00 BUYER CARD FOR 2001 201_99 PJJ~_L£Y~- BELZ, -ETC 291.99 JRNL-CD 71-7100-3~20 lOlO 8,401.25 AAO_nn 1,250.00 10,311.25 01-4140-2120 1010 71-7100-4140 1010 10311.25 O1-42mO-3mlO - 1ulO 10-00 SALARIES 22-4170-1390 10--0~ -,OR ILLS .............. 22-4170-1580 10-00 MA I~JTENANCE 22-4170-1380 JRNL-CD IC 6~4-.~9----D~C-~-SY-STExS PER AGREEr:E:4T 664.69 JRNL-CD 664.69 ....... 839.27 21.99 419.49 THRU 10-00 1914-601-425 2,794.~7 THRU 10-00 0217-606-329 409~Z2__~HRU lO-DO 2i$4-407-i47 IEI.26 THRU 1§-00 0047-005-229 10~.57 IHRU lO-O0 0664-50g-832 10~.5Z__ T~RU.1G-O0 0~64-508-g32 10m.58 THRU 10-00 0864-506-832 1,287.38 THRU IO-O0 0018-802-634 323..0Z THRU 10-00 0009-004-835 6,604.57 JRNL-CD 81-4350-5000 1010 TH~U 1u-o0 2245-301-939 01-4320-3710 THRI! lOyJ~ 0466-607-2_23 ...... 01-4.15R-3-710 - 71-7100-3710 73-7300-3710 22-4170-3710 01-4340-3710 01-4280-3710 73-7300-3710 75-7800-3710 78-7800-3710 01-4280-3710 lOiO 4,~2.~g._ ffHRU 10-00 4,~92.60 JR~L-C3 POWER CD VENDD:,', IOIAL . _ d. 1497.!Z 0542-505-00G-~06 1i/2 6./.D 0 VE'.;DOR TOTAL 01-4280-3 710 1010 10.~9 09-13-o0 T:tDU 10-1S-00 01-4140-3950 _l~_ ~9..--JRNL-C 0 ! 010 18.89 PAGE 12 AP-C02-01 F U R C H A S E J O ,J R N A L CITY OF HOUND VENDOR iNvOICE R. UE HOLD ..... _NO. iNVOICE NMuR _ DAI_fL__~-~TE ',T*T,JS P4000 544950o9 13b.32 MIX ...... ll/2g/gG-J, i3_ '2J~n 134.32 -.JRNL-CD PEPS I-COLA CuHPANY P4021 661299 6613U0 66J450 O6345i ---' 6~5803 v -': N UO R TOTAL 13~.32 665864 LIPS 1,130.40 11128/00 11/25/00 1,130.40 2§5.40 11125100 ll/2g/00 4,689.20 11/25/00 11125/00 4,6~9.20 95.00 li/25/00 i1/2~/00 95.00 4,153.37 1i/25/0G 11/2~/00 4,153.37 264.00 11/28/00 ll/2S/O0 264.00 LI(~UOR JRNL-CD wi r,,E WI NE JqNL-CD !-!I $CELLANEUUS ;~ O;,,-T A XA?, L-Z JR,iL-CD LIQUOR ~INE WINE & SPIRITS, $ VENDOR TOTAL 10600.37 8 36642 11/28/00 ll/2o/O0 709_L9__ F!GARETTES. 789.79 JRNL-CD ____ 36043 11/28/00 11/25/00 Ra_75 __C_I .',APES 80.75 JRNL-CD 36463 11/25/00 il/2m/00 133~_~. O_ £IGARS 133 .&0 JRNL-CD 3.6462 1i/28/00 ii/25/00 989.24 ¢ ! n A ALE_TI F._S JRNL-CD PINNACLE DISTRIDUTING _VE~gR TOTAl 19.93_. 18 . - ACCOUNT N~JMoER 71-7100-9540 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-o520 1010 71-7100-9520 1010 71-7129-955~ 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9520 lO10 71-7100-9550 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 71-7100-9550 1010 71-7100--9550 1010 ~4171 3949o5-00 77.06 WINE 71-71o0-9520 ll/_25Y.flu_]l/~,/n~ _ZY_.4~6__JENL-£D lOlO 89~906-00 2,907.40 LIQUOR ll/28/O0_iL/2&Z00 2_,991.40_ JRNL-CD 71-7100-9510 1010 &g5457-00 ~05.00 LIQUOR 71-7100-051G li/2g/O~_l!/2S/JO 4~5_aJ_.__J£~,L-CD 1CiO 8954~7-00 427.09 ~INE 11/20/00 i!/ZS/U0 ........... 427.09 JRNL-CD $97779-0U 3,703.30 LINUO~ ll/25/Ou.i173_dT-OJ~ _3~Y03~$0-- JRNL-Cb 71-7100-9520 i010 71-7109-9510 lOlu B98156-00 984.85 WINE 71-7100-9520 11/28/00 il/2gJJO .~4_.SS__JRNL-CD 1010 L/b3i PAGE AP-C02-O1 VENDOR ..... 10_ _i INVOICE 9,JE HOLg NMdR _.gA T~_.. T)A T .-" 5 T~,TLI$ PURCHASE CITY OF HOUND ~"UU~-T---~ESCRI. eTIDN J 0 U R N A ACCOLINT NUHoER --. &9;978-00 903028-00 ....... 90u029-00 900114-00 .......... 90U602-00 __~.UAL~TY NINE & R2681 06001243 08O01255 09001255 10001234 F/C REYNOLDS WELDING RANDY' S SANITATION _,R~ 250 536817-A 32o8170B R.OADRUNNkR R4290 79095 70596 79667 1i/25/0U 11/28/00 11/25/00 11/2~/00 11/28/00 11/25/00 li/2fl/00 11128/00 11128/00 il/2:SIOO SPIRITS V E-~'DO~ TNTaL_ L,-.~04,-26.._ L I ~JUOR 1,364.26 JPNL-CD 5 ' ~ f, 2--J:J----LI.~JUL)P... 5-662.~3 JRNL-CD 68~42 6~5.42 JRNL-CD 255-15---4. I2i0 OR 255.75 JRNL-CD 1---~_0_ ~J.N E 1,5~9.20 JRNL-C9 54 ~5-. 2~ 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9510 1010 71-7100-9540 1010 71-7100-9510 .. 1010 71-7100-9520 101u !l/23/OI)_lJ_f2~/OD _llK2g/Oo ll/ZgYOR 11/2A/o0 li/2B/OO__iJ_/23~0p SUPPLY CO VENDOR TOTAL 19.17 AIR AND OXYGEn; 22-4170-2200 ..... g.9..~.7_-JRNL-CD __ . - 1010 11/2~/00 ll/2a/O0 VENDOR TOTAL 19.8i AIR AND OXYGEN 22-~170-2200 19.17 AIR AND OXYGEN 19..LZ--_JRNL-CD 19.&l AIN AND OXYGEN 2.33 FINANCE CHARGE 2~I3-,-JP~:L-CD _ 80.29 22-4170-2200 ..... 10lO 22-4170-2200 22-4170-4100 - i010 110.77 10-00 TRASH SERVICE 01-4320-3750 ii0.77 JRNL-CD IOiO 110.77 ii/28/00 11/25/00 11/28/ ~1/2~/00 TRANSPPoT~TIuh~_y_f_i.~OR TOTAl .... 23_91_ £1-01-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 01-2300-10g6 23.9i JRNL-CO IOiO 24.0Z. 11-.02-00 .DELIVERY CHARGE 01-4060-3100 24.02 JR;JL-CD 1010 GZ.. 9_3 ..... ll/2g/O0 11/2 d/JO ___ 185.72 ICE 71-7100-9550 185.72 JRNL-CD 1GlO 1i/28/_00_i.L/2~Z~ 63.44 ICE 71-7100-9550 63.o44_ JRNL-CD 1010 31.60 ICE 11/28/0~ iZ./2.~Zoo. ............. 31.60 JRNL-CD 71-7100-9550 IOIO PAGE 14 AP-CC2-C1 V E N,,') Ok ___NO. iNVOlCi NMbR [h~vOICE DATE_ .... p 0 R C it A S E J O U R N A L CITY OF MOUND PJE HOLD b & T E__~_LA-T-~-----A-~CLU NI DE SC~, I P l I 9 .RON'3 iCL COMPAMY $43~0 001~ SHORELINE PLAZA 5~391 3050 SHOREWOOD TREE __54400 2170 __._~X~?ii OF ThE 5440? i8V90 SKYWAY i4~ 001231 SPORTING BREED ____5_4.461 SW31513 __ V EILLLgA --TJg-T-A-L--- VENDOR TOTAL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 11125106 11125/00 SEASON .... ~LSN~DP PJBLIC~TIJNS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 11/25/00 KENhELS VENDOR TOTAL ~g0.76 . 2,570.64 12-00 LI~UgP STORE RENTAL SPAC 2~576-~64--~R1~l.-C~ ........ 11/28/00 11/2~/00 2570.64 420.00 RIpGEWOOD RE,'~OVE TREE 426.00 JRNL-CD 426.00 __-$1~-5-.- YEHICLE DECALS 31.95 J~NL-Cb 594.00 11-02-00 THRU 10-23-00 AD .594.00 - JRNL-CD 594.00 525.00 12-00 DOG KENNEL FEE 325.00 JRNL-CD 325.00 I.RE~_2.6---kEPAIR LOADER 1,885.26 JRNL-CD ST. JOSEPH ENUiPI';EhT INC. VENDDR_IOIA]_ ..... __1.585.26 VENDgR TOTAL 11/26/00 11/2~/00 54605 21~4g2 965.00 THRU lC-1&-00 965.00 171.20 MISCELLANEOUS 171.20 J~NL-CP 2~955.90 ~EER 2,955.90 JRNL-CD SIS CO;,ISOLTANTS LTD 11/2g/00 11125100 O,702.15 1i/28/00 1t/2E./00 6,702.15 12.10 111 /oo 12.1o ........ gg.oo ii/2 /ou li/2 /oo 60.00 3,840.5~ 1i/2g10~ ll/2&/O0 3~$40.55 PRO SERVICES TAXABLE BEER JRNL-CD MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE JRNL-CD ~UE -T. ~ KEGS JP~,L-CD 6E-ZR JR ;IL -C D T4770 209627 20952~ Z09049 209050 17~3i9 21O323 ACCOUNT NJMbER 71-7100-3~20 lO1O 01-4340-5110 1010 22-4170-3500 1010 01-4190-3510 1010 01-4140-4270 1010 01-42g0-3~I0 10lO 55-5878-3100 1010 71-7100-9550 !C!S 71-7100-9530 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 71-7100-9550 iO1C 71-7100-9530 71-7100-9530 1010 PAGE iS AP-Co2-Oi VENDOP iNVOICE DUE .... NO4 iNvOICE NM'JR DATE___ 210931 210933 HOLb STATUS d R C I-: A g E J O U R N A L CITY OF MOUND A ~ U LN',II.--DE SC}< IJ~T I 0;,1 232.75 MISCELLANFDUS TAXABLE -2-,32~3.5 - JRNL-C O 0,~9o.05 ~EER THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN VENDOR TOTAL T4dO0 00.i025 lZ/ZS/oo 11/2~/oo TI',Io~'HY JOHNSON VENDOR TOTAL ___T4 ~o z ooo2~ 1/~28/00 i1/2~/00 T_i~.-m USS E ....... v 7 ,N F)r) ~ TF}T A~ T4805 13106 ..... 1i / 2BI O_O_lJ_/2 £ / 00 13077 20976.70 ACCOUNT NUMBER 71-7100-9550 1010 71-?100-o5~0 10t0 72.00 REIMBURSEMENT BOOT ALLOWANCE 01-4280-2246 72.00 JRNL-CD 1010 72.00 70-~.JJ_0 FAL.L_2000 CITY CONTACT 700.00 JPNL-CU TIME SAVER OFF SITE 3ECRE* VENDOR TOTAL T482-~ 10-07 11/25/00 11/28/00 TMB CONSULTING. INC. VENDOR TOTAL 302.88 i0-2~-00 HRA/COUNCIL "EETING 32.25 01-4020-3i00 1010 335.13 01-4020-4200 lOlO 81-4350-4200 . __I4831 703722 _ !iZ2_b,_/.OO 11/2&/00 10-19-00 NO NOTICE CANCELLATIO JR~LL__-CD ..................................... 1.Ol0 150.00 CLEAN PRINTERS 01-4095-3300 150.00 J~NL-CD !0!0 lOLL GAS & WEL~ING SUPPLY VENDOR TOTAL --T4~40 19360 11/2~/00 11/2~/00 i939~ ..... 11/25/0~ ll/2~/O0 TF.I-~TATi PUMP & CONTROL I VE~!DOR TOTAL 150.00 T.~95~ 070451 _4~£3_ £Y. LINDER LEASE RENEWAL 01-4280-2250 40.33 CYLINDER LEASE RENEWAL 73-7300-2250 40.&2 CYLINDEP, LEASE RENEWAL 78-7800-2250 ] ? ?. 42,---JJ=~L_-_L~ 10l 0 TRUE VAL~E 122.48 590.54 CHARGEW, LABOR, ETC 5~0.54 JRNL-CD 693.i0 DUPLEX CONTPDLLER, ETC 693.I0 JRNL-Co 1283.64 z.~.57--_.5 HOOKS 8.57 J~NL-CD 78-7800-3600 1010 78-7800-3800 1010 01-4340-2300 1010 01-4320-4200 10!0 VENDOR _TOTAL ......... 8.57 147.92 1]-00 ELEV,~TSR SEPVICE 147-92._ JRNL-CD i47.92 T4945 2~t582 THYSOEN LAGE~QUIST ELEVATO VZNDOR TOTAL PAGE ].6 AP-Cu2-Oi VENDOR .._____NO__ .iNv OiCi T4985 270673-0 27'3224-0 261791-A TWIN cITY OFFICE _ 2J5030 0869402 _-JJS-Y-I LT£R 02 001231 ---'-U~-IT~ ~O~ERTiE$ ,JATERTO'JN PARTS W5571 27917 p u R C ri A S E J O U R N A L CITY OF MOUND INVOICE OUE HOLD . ~.ATE __ DATF %TATiiR A~tOUNT -- F~g.~:~CR~I PT I ON 1g.10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1~.~0- ~ISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1~.10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES ]x=~G ~I$C~LC~NEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.U3 MISCELLANEOUS {}FFICE SUPPLIES 6.04 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 9~/}~-~M.I.SCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1i/22/00 i1/2c/O0 12U.69 93.66 11/2~/00 11/2b/00 93.~6 30.00 ll/2g/O0 11/2~/00 30.0§ suPPLY CO VENDOR'TOTAL 1i/2£/00 11/23/00 HI SCELLANEOUS J;~ NL-CD INK JET JR ;IL -C D OFFICE SUPPLIES J~;L-CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 244.35 389-25-- _MI~SCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 3g9.25 JqNL-CD ACCOUNT NdMbER 01-4040-210C 01-4090-2100 01-~140-2i00 01-4190-2100 01-4340-2100 -- 01-4280-2100 71-7100-2100 73-7300-2100 75-7800-2100 1010 ~-~170-~10o 1010 O1-41&O-21ou iO1D 73-7300-2300 lO10 ........ V F !-J' Il F} P TrIT A! 11128/00 1!/2~/00 VENDOR TOTAL _ !142._$JJ)o I 1/2~,/oo CENTER VENDOR TOTAL 11/2S/00 11/2a/00 '--~NKA MECHANICAL 'CONTR$ VENDOR TOTAL W5572 001107 . 11/2&/00 11/2~/00 '~TUNKA HEDICAL GRo'uP VEfIDOR TOTAL ~, 5o30 3745 ....... 37,+7 3750 31.95 12-00 BALBOA PARKING 01-4280-4200 73-7300-4200 7S-7800-4200 1010 3.1-.05-- 12-00 5ALBOA PARKING 31.95 12-00 5ALCOA PARKING 95.55 JRNL-CD 95.85 ~ ;-gD_ _ELEXTUi~E- AND CLAMP 11.90 FLEXTUBE AND CLAMP 11.90 FLEXTUbE AND CLAMP 3 5 = 7{~ ~R :d,~ C._D ................. 35.70 12~.zo ~iLLVALV~ 124.20 JRNL-CD 124.20 !5.00. _SPECIMEN, !5.00 SPEC I qE'.', 30.00 J~NL-CD 30.00 ................. 360.00 I0-26-00 1i/25/00 11/26/00 56C.00 JRKL-C~ TAFFE, JOHN GRADY, DAN REPLACE HYDRANT REPAIRED SE:{VtCE ~USH ROAD BISCONNECT 11/28/00 11/28/00 940.U0 JRNL-CD 9. ZC.OO. 10-16-00 01-4280-2250 73-7300-2250 75-7800-2250 · lulO 73-7300-2300 1010 01-4340-3140 01-4280-3140 1010 73-7300-3600 lO10 73-7300-3500 1010 73-7300-3800 PAGE 17 AP-C02-O1 CENDuP - NO... INVOICE 3751 3753 ~.5~9_0 _2911E 29429 ......... 29676 30012 ....... 30287 ..... 302841 304O9 -'M '~UELL<R & SONS _--Z.6i93 001107 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF HOUND NM$R I NVOI CE DATE L)UE HOLD ~L~TE STAT,tS 11/28/0U 11/28/00 A~dUhT ~ESCRIPTI~N 970.00 JRNL-CD ACCOUNT NUH6ER lulO 11128/00 11/25/00 700.UO iO-17-uO 700.00 J~NL-Cg 11128/00 ii/2~/00 VENDOR TOTAL 700.00 10-03-00 700.00 JRNL-C~ ~70.00 REPLACE CUR~ STUD, ET 73-7300-3800 1010 WAT~AIN BREAK 73-7300-3~00 i010 11/28/00 11/28/00 27~_7-7 i&-OJ~-O-O-~LACKTOP ...... 73-7300-23&0 ..... 27~.77 JRNL-CD 101o 11125/00 11/2~/00 f9-1~$~---10-12-00 BLACKTOP 7~-7~00-2340 591.98 JPNL-CJ 1010 11/28/00 11/26/00 O&~o-.-Z~17-~ BLACKTOP - 73-7300-2340 646.79 JPNL-CD 1010 I1/2~/00 ll/2b/O0 &&5__$4___ 10-2~-00 BLACKTOP 73-7300-2340 4~5.~4 JRNL-CD 1010 1i/28/00 11/28/00 1,12A_~:P ~---2-7-~X~0 BLACKTOP ........ 73-7300-2340 1,126.62 JRNL-CD ]OlO 11128/00 11128/00 108.72 11/28/00 ll/2S/O0 108.72 VENDOR TOTAL 3685.7I 72~_5~, 10--2~-00 BLACKTOP ~ 73-7300-2340 223.49 10-27-00 BLACKTOP 78-78D0-2340 446.99 JRNL-CD 1010 10-30-00 BLACKTOP 78-7800-2340 JRNL-CD 1010 11/28/00 11/28/00 9n_nn !!-q~OO~ECZION OFFICIAL ....... 01-4060-1300- 90.00 JRNL-[D 1010 ....... V~_NDDR T~TAI ANN SCHINGLER 16731 O01107 JENSEN, ELIZABETH M. VENDDR TOTAL 16732 OO!i07 11/28/00 11/2&/O0 -SHEPHERD, HARRIET C. VENDOR TOTAL 112.00 I1-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 l12~OL _.L%NL-£D _ . !010 112.00 ~0.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 90.00 JRNL-CD 1010 90.00 16733 001107 -'ILS jN, CLIFFORD ................ 30.00 11-07-00 11/28/00 ll/2b/O0 30.00 JR NL-CD .... ~h~i[LQ ~ TQTAI ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 1010 16734 001107 60.00 I1-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 11/28/00 lJ./2 ~/_0 § ............ 6~ 00. JRNL-CD 01-4000-1300 lOlO PAGE 18 AP-CO2-Oi VENDOR iNVOiCk DUE HOLD ..... NO. I";VOiCL N~BR DATL____4)ATE ~T_AT:jS P b R C m A $ E J O d R N A L CITY OF M,SUND -A-Z-OLt~/---DESCRIPTIDN ACC~,UNT NOME, ER __DAVIS, KARIN 16735 001107 STAR~, NANCY 16737 001107 CHARON, KAROL 16Z3~ 001107 _ ._V3_-ND g R LOLAL 6~J-. O0 ....... 24.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL VEN~0R TOTAL 24.00 11128/00 11/28/00 105.00 11-07-00 ELECTIO'~ OFFICIAL 105.00 JRNL-CD VENDOR TOTAL 105.00 11/28/00 11125/00 50-.-00 .i!-QJ-00_ ELECTION OFFICIAL 60.00 JR:~L-CD ANDE.~q_$ON, REBECCA ....... V:NFLQp TOTAl 167S9 001107 ......... 11/28/00 i 112_2~/a o ,,'ERN£R, CHAROLETTE A. VENDOR TOTAL 16740 001107 PAYNE, PAULI~E Z 6741~ 001107 ..... _RICHTER, EDWARD 16743 001107 SCHULTZ, DEB Z6744 00i137 RASMUSSEN, TOM 16745 001107 _RICE, KATHY Z~746 001107 11/28/00 11/28/00 VENDOR TOTAL 11/28100 11/28/00 VENDOR TOTAL VENDOR TOTAL 11125/00 i!/2~/00 .......... 3~NDOR TOTAl qICHTER, ELLA 16747 001107 ~6.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 36_._~]l--~JRNL-CD 30.00 01-4060-130G 1010 01-4060-1300 1010 01-4060-1300 101o 01-4060-13n0 lO10 93.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 93.00 JRNL-CD IOlO 93.00 gn_nn lJ---]]-7~O-O- ~ L E C T I 0 N OFFICIAL 90.00 JRNL-CD 105.00 01-4060-1300. 1010 105.00 eo 11-07-o0 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 J R N L ~'-r'-'"D .................... 1010 90.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 90.00 J~NL-Cb lOlu 01-4060-1300 1010 90.00 9G~OO._ 11-07-00 90.00 JR,~L-CD 9~0 ELECTION OFFICIAL gO.O0 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4000-1300 11/28/00 11/28/00 ............. 90.00 JRNL-CD !010 VY NDOR TOTAL 00.90 105.00 105.00 11/28/00 11/28/00 1~.'-~:?--00 ELECTION OFFICIAL JRNL-CD 01-40~0-1300 10!0 PAGE AP-C02-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF HOUND VENDOR 1HVOICE DUE HOLD ....... NO_ it:VOiCE.,"'-~..;w, D~,I.E. DATE ACCUUNT N d:4.~ E R COLEMAN, CHRIS 1674~ 001107 MILLER, SARA _.Z6749 001107 VENDOR TOTAL 1i/20/00 11/28/00 VENDOR TOTAL 1~/2.,100 11/2b/00 105.00 119.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 119.00 J~NL-CD 1010 119.00 ___~9~.50__ 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4000-1300 49.50 JRNL-C2 1010 ___[,.OFNIG, [DYTH~ 16750 O011U7 V ~- N ~.q R TO, T Al 97.50 ll-07-GO ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4000-1300 REGAN, MARGIE J. 16752 001107 MUELLER, MICHAEL ___ZfzT_5_3__O. OllOZ_ ~_ VENDOR TOTAL 97.50 108.50 11/25/00 11/2~/00 108.50 VENDOR TOTAL 11/28/00 11/2~/00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-40~0-1300 JRNL-C2 1010 108.50 ~6 _ On ;.l_-_-q_7_-4AO~ EL£-CTI O.N -OFF.I£ lab ....... 01-4060-1300 --. 36.00 JRNL-CD 1010 __G.ILHORE, JOLENE 16754 001107 .... ~c~iZO. R TnTAI ii/2LL/~D 1~/2~/oo 90.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 ANDERSON, MARION 16755 001167 ADAMS, EdGENE R. ..... 16750 001107 VENDOR TOTAL 11/25/00 Ill25/0~ VE~.!DOR TOTAL 11128/00 11128/00 96.00 96.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-40~0-1300 96.00 JRNL-CD I010 96.00 90~ .... 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 90.00 JRNL-CD 1010 .... d.ASS£, CKLAIN Z6757 001107 ...... V.f_~¢DD_R TOTAL 11/2B/00 ll/2&l.00___ .... 9Q,O~ 93.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 .93.00 JRNL-CD lO10 5UNDbERG, HAZY LOU 1675~ 001107 ~UTTjRMSoi;, PATTY __~6_259 001107 VENDOR TOTAL VENDOR T~')TAL ii/~/oo ii/2~/oo 93.06 105.50 i1-07-G0 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-40~0-1300 108.50 JRNL-CD i010 i0~.50 9~_0_~_.1!-92-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-~'060-1300 93.00 JRNL-CD 1010 . .ORN, PHYLLIS VENDOR TOIAL ........ 93.00 - PAGE ;~0 AP-C02-0; VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD DAT~ 2LkA T E STATUS PO R C HAS E CITY OF f.',OUfiD -DE SCR.I PT ! JOURNAL ACCOUNT NU~OER _26761 001107 26762 001107 JESS~N, PHYLLIS 26773 COMiO0 11/28/00 11/2~/00 ...... V~uDOP TOTAL 11/28/00 _I1~2~00 VEND9R TOTAL ~-.l~O - 11-07-00 B4.00 JRNL-CC 8-'~ _gO 93.00 11-07-00 ~J_$O---JR N L -£ O 93.00 11/28/00 ii/28/00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 2673_A _POL ICE ___~EYELOPMENTAL Z6775 5855 ~$ TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES VENDOR TOTAL !l/2&/O0 11/25/00 RESOURCES,__$~EI~D[]R TOTAL VENDOR TOTAL ~/00 11/25/00 11/~ ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 1010 01-4060-1300 1010 277.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 01-~040-3100 277.50 JRNL-CD 1010 ANDERSON,'------ DOROTHY J. VENDOR TOTAL _ Z. 6777 001107 11/2~/00 1!/2 ~.,/00 RFGA_N, _JAMES E. VFhDq~ TCITAt 26776 001107 SHIRLEY G. 001107 KOECiiELER, K.D. _ _26.780 0011~7 SHANLEY, DED: 267gl 001107 IAYLOR, TOM LUND, Z6779 VENDOR TOTAL 277.50 99.00 _.~SISTRA]'~gN, ALEXANDER, MICHI 99.00 JRNL-CD 99_00 ........ 3,810.00 ALARH~TRAN'SMITTER & SENSOR 01-4140-4110 .... 1010 .21 0 3210.00 01-4140-5000 ........................... 1GlO - - 102.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 102.00 JRNL-CD ldlO 01-~060-1300 1010 01-4060-1300 1010 01-4060-1300 lOlO 01-4060-1300 1010 102.00 9~1,~ ll-O7-OD ELECTION OFFICIAL 96.00 JR~L-CD ~o=nn ............... 73.50 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 73 ~ 5~--_JR NL -C D 73.50 102.00 ll-07-O0 ELECTION OFFICIAL ELECTIOx OFFICIAL ~LECTInN ,)FF!C IAL 11/28/00 11/2~/00 102.00 JRNL-CD VENDDR TOTAL 102.00 9~50 11-07-00 11/2~/00 Ii/28/00 97.50 JRNL-CD V~NDDR_TOIAL- ......... 97-50 90.00 11-07-00 VENDOR TOTAL 90.00 01-4060-1300 i010 PAGE AP-Co?-01 VENDOR [N¥O[C£ DUE itOLD .... NO. INVOiCF ....... ll/~&/O0 HALL, RICHARD S. V~NDO~ TOTAL ..... ~NEs, GERALD P. V~'~DOR TOTAL . z6z~ oozzo~ ~.EBER, ELIZABETH ..... ~ TflTAL Z6Z55 P U R C m A S E J O U R N A L C!TY OF I.IOUNJ 75.00 li-O?-O0 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1500 Y~.~O JRNL-CD 1010 75.00 56.00 11-07-00 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-40~0-1300 56.00 JRNL-CD 1010 56.00 11 - 0 7~,_~-£.LEC T.I 01; 3FFIC IAL . JRNL-CD 01-4060-130-0 1010 93.00 93.00 11-07-30 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 o3-on J~ t~L-~_2 ....... l'OlO WEILANB, 5ETTY JANE VENDOR TOTAL Z67~6 001107 1i/2~/oo 1~/2~/oo BOSTROH, ~ON~LD D. VENDOR TOTAL _ Z67~7 000912 001107.. L£iS INGER, DJANE 11/28/00 11/28/00 lI/2B/O0 11/28/00 ~DDR T~TAI TOTAL ALL 93.00 35.00 11-07-00 35.00 JRNL-CD 35.00 105_00 105.00 77.00 77.00 1R?_nn 217,194.27 ELECTION OFFICIAL 01-4060-1300 1010 og_-_l_2rO. O ELECTION OFFICIAL JRNL-CD 01-4060-1300 1010 ll--0-Z~0.0-£L~CILON OFF. ICIAL 01-4060-1500 ..... JRNL-CD 1010 P SOLtrrxo #oo- II ! RESOLUTION TO APPROVE LAKESIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 5395 BAYWOOD SHORES DRIVE, LOT 15 AND 16, BLOCK 6, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES AND PART OF VACATED SMABER BOULEVARD, PID # 13-117-24 22 0056 P & Z CASE//00-63 WHEREAS, the applicant, has requested variances to remodel and add a second story to the existing residence at 5395 Baywood Shores Drive. The associated variances are as follows: Existin~ Required Variance Lakeside 20 feet 50 feet 30 feet (channel) Lakeside 45 feet 50 feet 5 feet (Harrison Bay) ; and, WHEREAS, the property is located within an R-I Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires standards as indicated above and front yard setbacks of 30 feet, lot area of 10,000 square feet, lot frontage on an improved public street of 60 feet, and sideyard setbacks of 6 feet for lots of record; and, WHEREAS, the existing home is a one story structure and as proposed, the request would allow the conversion to a two story structure that would maintain the existing footprint and setbacks; and, WHEREAS, hardcover will remain unchanged at 19 percent as proposed; and, WHEREAS, a shed is located between the attached garage and the channel that does not meet accessory structure lakeside setback requirements; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended that the Council approve the variance as requested by the applicant and recommended by staff; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: a. The shed be removed or moved to a conforming location. 2. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: LOT 15 AND 16, BLOCK 6, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES AND PART OF VACATED SMABER BOULEVARD, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. J'nl TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: November 13, 2000 SUBJECT: Variance Request APPLICANT: Mike and Sylvia Gold CASE NUMBER: 00-63 HKG FILE NUMBER: 00-5 LOCATION: 5395 Baywood Shores Drive ZONING: Residential District R- 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted a request add a second story to the existing one story residence. To accomplish this, the following variances are being requested: Proposed Required Variance Lakeside setback 20 feet 50 feet 30 feet (channel yard) Lakeside setback 45 feet 50 feet 5 feet The building plans show a full second story for the entire home to match the existing first story footprint. The second story addition will incorporate 3 bedrooms, baths, and loft above the garage. Living space on the first floor will be reoriented living Space. The screened porch will remain as single story. Staff feels the variances are reasonable requests for expansion of the home. Hardcover and lakeside setbacks will remain unchanged as proposed. The gable roof facing the channel on the west property line is a good method to minimize the effect of a two story wall. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the request. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 :~riartce Applica~an, P. 3 Case No./~[ o Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No~. If yes, explain: Yes ~, No (). If yes, explain: Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? o Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a vadance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? ,,.j I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the ent~ in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized offidal of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature .. Ap. plicant's Signature Date Date /0 '- ~ ~ 0(..~ V'aria~ce Application, P. 2 Do the existing structures comply wi~ aFarea, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district- in which it is located? Yes (), No .j~j'. If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ( N S E W ) fL Side Yard: ( N S E W ) f. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W,~) ft. Lakeside: ( N S E(~]) ~70 ft. : (NSEW) ft. Street Frontage: ft. Lot Size: sq ft Hardcover. sq ft ff. ff. ff. ff. ff. ff. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. .sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ft Does_ th/e present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes.~ No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: o Please Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other:, specify CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDRESS' OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) LOTAREA ,2/: 94/~' SQ:FT:'X"40'%'-='"(forlLO'ts0fRi~.-c0'rd°) ........ I R-Z?¢ I' LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) *Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as 'outlin.ed..in Z. on!ng Ordinance Section 350:1225,Subd. 6. B. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. HOUSE DETACHED BLDGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. DECKS Open decks (1/4' min. opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover OTHER LENGTH WIDTH TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS ................. x = I'~ d 15', 5- x I,' 7 = TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .................. 30?7_. TOTAL OTHER ............. ; ........... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE UNDER / OVER (indicate difference.)..= ......,....7. ~..........-... ~....~--, .. · ~ · ....,-.. · · · · PREPARED BY ~'OFF,r~ ~. ~,~o~i3¢P.~,, l~d,,, DATE ¢'z~ o c~ -I-/-oo CITY OF MOUND HARD(~OVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) il PRO.P. ERTY ADDRESS: 5",2 ~]5' ,~/f~'~,,~ /',/,'~,( ~'/ .~,¢/z/¢' ..... OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) LOTAREA 2/: c~4./Y'_' SQ:FT:'X"40'%'-='"(forr6'ts0f'R~'co'rd*) ........ I ~??¢ LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) *Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlin.ed.in Zon!ng Ordinance Section 350. ;1 225,Subd:.6. B:.I. (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Offic!al. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = ,_"~ O'~:]-O¢, -- tL!.OU,~ E ,5'2..'"' X = -co.c.- i'~',c~ oP ~.'.," DETACHED BLDGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. DECKS Open decke (1/4" min. opening between boards) with ~ pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover OTHER TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS ................. x : If.S- x I,'77 = Z7a' --x = TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .................. 1032 TOTAL OTHER ............. : ........... q-?_ot, I TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE J UNDER / OVER (indicate difference.)..:......,..-.~- ~ :....:....-'. · ;'.. '~.., '. · ~ · '.",'-.' .... J PREPARED BY ~'o¢'¢~m ~. ~;--~,~or4¢51~i;~/ J~, DATE ¢'~'7 o .I c~ -I-7-00 Z b.J ~ <~ 0 m 0 La Z m Z <Z[ -- LAKF-- MINNF_.TONKA , MOUNI~, MINNESOTA OF LOTS 15 AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CAREY LIF$ON &: 16, BLOCK 6, REPLAT OF HARRISON PART OF VACATED SMABER BOULEVARD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SHORES LAKE / / / SAYW°o2 SHOREs DRIVE SMABER BOULEVARD / / / / /1¢I~( EXISTING MINNETONKA I S 80° I I tt ,~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lots 1.% and 16, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, and that port of the 60 foot radius circle for SMABER BOULEVARD os shown and dedicated in the plot of REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES which lies outside the circumference of o 50 foot radius circle having the some center os said 60 foot circle, and which lies southeasterly of the northeasterly extension of the northerly line of Lot 16, Block 6, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, which od joins Lot 1, Block 5 of said plot, and which lies southerly of o line drown westu:ly along the extension of the south line of the .50 foot right of way for SMABER BOULEVARD for o distance of .:30 feet from the most northerly corner of Lot 15, said Block 6. 0 : denotes iron marker (935.9); denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum Beorings shown ore hosed upon on ossumed dotum. DESIONED ~! DATE ~--~X~-l--i ~1--1 "~°/I This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of on existing house and shed, and the location of oll visible "herdcover" thereon, It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. DESCR~P TION COFFIN & CRONBER6, INC, COfiSULTHG ENG~ERS, LA~I) SURVEYORS, ~[ 482 ~AMARACK AVENUE, lONG lAKE, UAL 612-473-4141 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICA11ON, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER lay D~RECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROCESSIONAL ENC4N[ER ANO LANO SI~'v'[YOR LFi~R T~'£ LAWS CF Iii STATE CF I,J,I~SOTA. DA~E ,.r-,-,/7-,~.~ "~ LICENS£ NUMBER ~2.?fl SCALE DATE: 5--17--(~ JOB NO. 00-199 00--199 LT OF RECORD? YES / NO CI'I'Y OF MOUND - ZONING INFORIVlATION SIIEET ZONING DISI'RiCT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: EXISTING LOT SIZE: B1 3,500/0 B2 20,000/80 R2 6,000/40 B3 10,000/60 R2 ~4,000/80 R3 SRE OlZD. ll LOT WID'IIk LOT DF. PTI. I: IIOUSE ......... FRONT FRONT SIDE SIDE REAR 15' '~/S E W N S E W N S Ei~W N S E W LAKE N S E W TOP OF BLUFF GARAGE, SilED ..... DETACIIED BUILDINGS FRONT N S E W FRONT N S E W SIDE N S E W 4'OR6' SIDE N S E W 4'OR6' REAR N S E W 4' LAKE N S E W 50' i'OP OF BLUFF 10' OR 30' of ~he requirements ou0i~tcd in die Cily of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact lhe City of Mound (~50) This Zoning lo£ormalion Shoe{ only summarizes a portion ...... Planning Departme_n! at 572-0600. 0 ~ ~.. ~ ~- 0 C~o 0 t.n I 0 I ~ { ~ NOTE, DETAIL OF ~.OCXS 3 & 5 F(ARR I SON SHORES. SEE RECORDi PLAT. BID TABULATION ;CT: Municipal Parking Lot DATE: November 22, 2000 OWNER: City of Mound FILE#: 12544 / PLANHOLDER BID BOND MVIOUNT COMMENTS Barber Construction Co., Inc. PO Box 5324 Hopkins, MN 55343 Carl Bolander & Sons Co. 251 Starkey St., PO Box 7216 St. Paul, MN 55107 DCS, Inc. 614 N. Broadway St. Jordan, MN 55352 Diamond 5 Construction 17898 Kale Avenue Hutchinson, MN 55350 Doboszenski & Sons, Inc. 6450 Pioneer Trail Loretto, MN 55357 Farr Construction 100 Bridge Ave. E., PO Box 277 lano, MN 553328 Klingberg Trucking 17822 Panama Ave. Prior Lake, MN 55372 Shauna Corp. 3306 Lyndale Ave. N. Minneapolis, MN 55412 USD-Minnesota, LLC 2105 Daniels StreetV Long Lake, MN 55356 l/C'° Veit & Company, Inc. 14900 Veit Place Rogers, MN 55374-9583 $:kmain:\ Mou 12544\specs\\bidtab Inc. 875 N. Prior Avenue · St. Paul, MN 55104 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Mound, Minnesota 55364 Attn: Joyce Nelson November 6,2000 Dear Joyce; E-Z Recycling is pleased to submit the following proposal for 3 years. l~t year 2001 $2.15 perHH 2"a year 2002 $2.20 per 3rd year 2003 $2.25 per HH E-Z Recycling will begin a two-sort system. We will accept all fibers in one bin, and glass cans plastic in another. We ask that cardboard still be no larger than 3 x 3 flattened and bundled with string or twine. E-Z will also pick-up box board. Pick-up will be weekly on Monday and Tuesday. A driver will stop at City Hall at the end ofthe day. E-Z Recycling Inc. has enjoyed serving your city. We look forward to serving your city for the next 3 years. Please provide us. with your most recent household count Since[ely; ,, J E-Z Recycling Inc. 5'3 ~LUTION NO. RESOL~ON TO AUTHORIZE THI*~ MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A 3 YEAR CONTRACT WITH E-Z RECYCLING FOR Wie~EKLY CURBSIDE RECYCLING IN THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE YEARS 2001, 2002, AND 2003 WHERF_AS, on December 31, 2000, the City of Mound's contract, for curbside recycling, with E-Z Recycling expires; and Wl:IEREAS, the Lake Minnetonka Solid Waste Management Group (LMSWG) consisting of the Cities of Mound, Wayzata, Shorewood, Excelsior, Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach, have reviewed E-Z's performance and service and is satisfied; and WI~REAS, the Recycling Coordinator and LMSWG are recommending a three year contract (2001, 2002, and 2003) with E-Z Recycling at the following prices per household, starting in January of each year: 1st year 2001 - $2.15 per household 2nd year 2002 - $2.20 per household 3rd year 2003 - $2.25 per household NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a 3 year (1998, 1999 and 2000) contract (EXHIBIT "A" attached and made a part of this resolution) with E-Z Recycling for weekly curbside recycling at the following per household amount starting in January of each year: 1st year 2001 - $2.15 per household 2nd year 2002 - $2.20 per household 3rd year 2003 - $2.25 per household The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Attest: City Clerk Mayor November 28, 2000 Ressolution It00- AGREEMEaNT FOR RECYCLING COLLECTION This Agreement is made on the__ day of ,2000, between the City of Mound, located at 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 ("City") and E-Z Recycling, Inc. (Contractor). The purpose of this statement is to set forth terms and conditions for recycling collection by E-Z Recycling for the City. The City and E-Z Recycling agree as follows: SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. "Recycling collection" means the picking up of all recyclable materials accumulated at the curb of mutually agreed upon residential properties and other City designated collection stops in the City and the transporting of the recyclable materials to a specified processing site or market. Be "Unprocessed Local Spot Market: CLILSM means the monthly weighted average price per ton which a processing site or market (within the seven- county metro area including a Hennepin County Facility) in existence for a least 6 months would collect/charge for accepting a specific material.) The processing site or market is subject to change on a monthly basis. The average will be calculated using the price in effect on Wednesday morning C. "Material proceeds" means a positive ULSM multiplied by the tons collected. SECTION 2. PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay E-Z Recycling the following per household for weekly curbside collection of recyclables beginning in January of each year of the contract 1st year 2001 $2.15 per household 2nd year 2002 $2'.20 per household 3rd year 2003 $2.25 per household SECTION 3. OBLIGATIONS. E-Z Recycling shall provide weekly collection services for all recyclable materials on Monday & Tuesday. Collections will begin on Monday, January 5, 2001. Materials to be collected. E-Z Recycling will collect the following recyclable materials, placed by the resident in or near a container placed at curbside assuming the preparation of materials: 1. Newspaper - all newspaper materials including inserts. November 28, 2000 Resolution tt00- Cardboard - all corrugated cardboard, flattened and bundled in pieces no larger than 3 x 3 and placaxl ia or next to the container. Glass - mixed clear, brown and green glass food and beverage containers. 4. Aluminum - all food and beverage containers including foil. 5. Bi-Metal - all food and beverage containers. 6. Office Paper - all office, phone books, junk and computer paper. 7. Magazines - all glossy and or other type of magazines. 8. Plastics - with a neck. Folding Cartons - Empty Cereal, Cake mix, cracker and cookie cartons, flattened with liners removed. Paper egg cartons (flattened). The method of collecting recyclables will be a co-mingle, two-sort. Glass, cans and plastic in one bin, paper products in the other bin. Corrugated boxes will be broken down and bundled no larger than 3' x 3' and placed next to bins. The City may require additional material be added to collections or stop collections of certain material upon thirty (30) days written notice. Improperly prepared recyclables, that is recyclables not reasonably free of food, dirt or other contaminants, or materials other than those specified above can be left in the container along with an educational tag identifying that material as not being collected in the program. Report requirements: E-Z Recycling will be required to report the following information: E-Z Recycling must report weights of recyclables collected on a monthly basis. E-Z Recycling must provide certified weight receipts for all materials collected within 15 days of the end of the month for the previous month. If each material is not weighed separately on an on-going basis, E-Z Recycling must indicate the procedure that will be used to determine individual material breakdowns. The City may require E-Z Recycling to separately weigh each material at any time at its discretion and at no additional cost to the substantiate accuracy of the proposed procedure. E-Z RecycLing must report, by individual materials and mounts, where materials are delivered for recycling. State law requires counties to ensure that the materials are recycled. Consequently, if E-Z Recycling delivers materials to a broker, E-Z Recycling must report what end market the broker used. Summaries by brokers and markets must be provided within 15 days of the end of the month for the previous month. Brokers or recyclable processors receiving materials must have the November 28, 2000 Resolution ~ appropriate state and local Permits or licenses. If materials are stored for a period longer than 30 days by E-Z Recycling, the amounts of materials by type and location of storage must be reported. E-Z Recycling must provide set-out rates using a method acceptable to the City for all households placing recyclables out for collection. If the Contractor damages any resident's property or bins, the Contractor may be held liable. F. EQUIPMENT REQ~S: The Contractor must obtain all pertinent licenses from the County and Cities. All vehicles must be maintained in proper working conditions and available for inspection by the City or County. Vehicles should be equipped with warning flashers, back-up alarms, a broom and shovel for spills and the conUactors name and phone number prominently displaced on both sides of the vehicles. Garbage vehicles may not be used to collect recyclables without prior permission from the City and the vehicle is clearly marked 'recyclables~. G. FACILITIES TO BE COLLECTED. 1. All single family dwellings. 2. All eight-plex and smaller apartment buildings. 3. All City owned and operated buildings. Recyclables are to be collected at the curb, except where the dwelling is more than 300 feet from the curb or the resident's physical abilities are impaired. MISSF~D COLLECTIONS: Whenever the City or a resident notifies the Contractor of locations which have not received scheduled service, the Contractor is required to service such locations before 7:00 P.M. of the same day when notified prior to noon. When notified after noon, the Contractor shall service such locations not later than 12:00 noon of the following day. HOLIDAYS November 28, 2000 Resolution ~0- A procedure for Holiday collections shall be mutually agreed upon by the City and E-Z Recycling. $. MARKET DEVFJ.OPMENT The City reserves the fight to require E-Z Recycling to deliver up to 25 % of the collected newsprint for market development proposed to a location within Hennepin County for a price not less than the ULSM. SECTION 4. MATERIAL REVFaNUE SHARING E-Z Recycling will pay revenue sharing of 50% of the exceeded unprocessed local spot market (ULSM). The ULSM price per ton will remain he same. Material ULSM Price Per Ton News (loose unbaled) Cardboard (loose unbaled) Glass (Mixed unsorted) Plastic (mixed unsorted) Cans (mixed unsorted) $15.00 $20.00 $30.0O $36.00 $570.00 SECTION 5. TERM The term of this agreement shall be January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003. SECTION 6. CANCELLATION Either party may cancel this agreement at any time, with do cause, upon one hundred and twenty (120) days written notice to the other party. In such event of termination, E-Z Recycling shall be entitled to payment of those services furnished up to the termination date. SECTION 7. GENERAL ¢ONOmONS All services and duties performed by E-Z Recycling pursuant to this agreement shall be performed to the satisfaction of the City and in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations as a condition of payment. E-Z Recycling agrees to comply with Minnesota Statutes 181.59, relating to nondiscrimination. Be E-Z Recycling must obtain and provide the City with a Certificate of Insurance indicating the following minimum levels of insurance coverage are in effect: Worker's Compensation Statutory Contractor's Public Liability Insurance - Property Damage $ 50,000. Nove~,r ~, 2000 R~solution ~ Automobile Public Liability The Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that the coverage will not be cancelled without thirty (30) days prior notice to the City. E-Z Recycling shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees and agents, for all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorney's fees, which they may suffer or for which they may be held liable, as a result of the fault of E-Z Recycling or its employees. The provisions of this agreement are severable. If any portion hereof is, for any reason, held by a Court of Competent jurisdiction, to be contrary to law, such decision shall not effect the remaining provisions of the agreement. This agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties including all prior understanding and agreements, and may not be modified except in writing signed by all parties. CITY OF MOUND Mayor City Manager E-Z RECYCLING, INC. December 30, 1997 5 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1667 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 November 20, 2000 MEMORANDUM To : Mayor/City Council From: Jim Fackler, Park Director Ref: Appointment of New POSAC Member/s. At the November 9, 2000 POSAC meeting four applications had been received for the one vacancy on the commission. Three applicants were present for a interview, Susan Taylor, Derrick Hentz and Michael Schoephoerster. The fourth applicant Ron Motyka was said to have sent a letter but staff had not received at the time of the meeting. The POSAC recommendation is to give the current open member position to Susan Taylor to begin in December of 2000. A second position that will open when Commission Member Peter Meyer moves to the City Council in January 2000 be filled by Derrik Hentz. And that a sixth appointed member position be created by the City Council and be filled by Michael Schoephoerster. attachments; Exert from November 9, 2000 POSAC Minutes. Letter from Ron Motyka received 11-13-2000. Memorandum relating to Ron Motyka letter. printed on rec¥cled paper MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION NOVEMBER 9, 2000 Present were: Commissioners Peter Meyer, John Beise, Tom Casey; and City Council Representative Leah Weycker. Also present was Park Director Jim Fackler. Absent and excused: Commissioner Norman Domholt Also present was City Councilmember Bob Brown, and POSAC applicants Michael Schoephoerster, Derrick Hentz and Susan Taylor. Mayor Pat Meisel and City Councilmember Mark Hanus left the meeting when it was learned that there was no posted notice for the City Council to be at this meeting. Chair Beise called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 12, 2000 POSC MINUTES Motion made by Casey, seconded by Weycker, to approve the minutes of the October 12, 2000 Park and Open Space Commission (POSAC) meeting, as amended below. Motion carried unanimously. 1. Page 2, Section 3a, Paragraph 1: "...He indicated that tonight he is in the position of looking at plats for this area._ c~d__Due to the lack of an ethics policy in Mound, hc ';;c'J!d !!kc ~,c d!$c!c~c and that the entire Commission was in favor of saving the park land, he will not recuse himself in discussinq or voting on this issue. 2. AGENDA CHANGES The agenda was approved as presented/with the following amendments: 1. Add 9a: Discuss: Park Dedication Laws 3. INTERVIEW PAR K AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION CANDIDATES Chair Beise pointed out that on the first of the year there will be a need for two candidates, and questioned whether right now there should be consideration for both candidates, rather than only the one vacancy currently available. Park Director Fackler stated that since Peter Meyer was elected to City Council, the candidates could be considered for both vacancies, with one starting possibly in December, and the other starting in January, if the City Council approves both recommendation s. Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission November 9, 2000 Chair Beise also questioned the policy of interviewing the applicants early in the meeting,~-,~'~,~ and then voting at the end of the meeting. Beise suggested holding the vote at the end of the interview process, in order to pass along the decision right away. Counciimember Bob Brown stated that Mr. Ron Moytka is not in attendance tonight as he was called away by his job. Mr. Moytka had sent a letter to the Mayor and Park Director explaining the reasons for his absence and expressing his comments regarding his desire to serve on the POSAC. The Park Director had not received the letter and asked Mayor Meisel if she had received her copy of the letter?. She had not. A copy of this letter was not available, but Brown stated he would try to obtain a copy before the end of the interview process in order to submit it to the Commissioners for review. Chair Beise invited Mr. Michael Schoephoerster, 2550 Lakewood Lane, to be interviewed and the other candidates present to step out. Mr. Schoephoerster summarized his desire to be on the Commission in order to be involved in the community where he and his family live. Improving the playground equipment and maintaining the beaches are two issues he sees as being very obvious. He and his children play together at Avon park, and the school playground as well. Councilmember Weycker asked if there was $1000.00 to spend on the parks, what would it be spent on. Mr. Schoephoerster stated that permanent bathrooms would be a very nice addition to the parks, and would make people want to use the parks more. Temporary satellites serve the purpose, but that is all. Commissioner Meyer asked if he would be involved with more hands-on responsibilities such as cleaning up the parks, Walk for Parks, and so on. Mr. Schoephoerster stated that he is not opposed to these types of activities to an extent, but the City parks are not a non-profit organization, and it should not end up being a few people volunteering all their time for park improvement. He suggested that as a City, we should be willing to pay for park maintenance and so on. Park Director Fackler brought up the concem that no notice was posted regarding the City Council being present, and with more than three members in attendance (currently four), the present Councilmembers cannot ask questions or participate in the discussion. If this meeting was not noticed regarding City Council at all, then more than three members should not be present this evening. After looking into the noticing, Mayor Meisel and Councilmember Mark Hanus left the meeting. Councilmember Bob Brown questioned what project, if one could be picked, would be the project that would take precedence over all other projects. 2 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission November 9, 2000 Mr. Schoephoerster answered that pursuing a trail system, including turning the railroac~/~,~_.. track into a trail, would be one of the best things that could happen to the town, as it would tie the parks and the whole town together. Commissioner Casey questioned whether the trail or the downtown gathering place, as indicated on the application, would be the more important issue. · Mr. Schoephoerster answered that the gathering place may be directed at older residents or residents without small children and, if possible, it could be altered to include playground equipment or something to attract families with children as well. The trails would bring all the other parks together and the two projects would intertwine at some point. Chair Beise then invited Mr. Schoephoerster to step out and send in Derrick Hentz. Consensus was reached to vote right after the interview process as well. Mr. Derrick Hentz, 4655 Cumberland Road, then addressed the Commission regarding his desire to be involved in the decisions made regarding changes in his community. Councilmember Weycker asked if there was $1000.00 to spend on the parks, what would it be spent on. Mr. Hentz answered that first he would have to see if the money could best benefit one area, or if there was a way to benefit the whole City with that amount. Safety would always be the number one priority, and if there was any area where safety was a concern, this would likely be the first choice for him. Councilmember Bob Brown then questioned what project, if one could be picked, would be the project that would take precedence over all other projects. Mr. Hentz stated that safer, more attractive playground equipment would be a priority, to make the parks more attractive to all ages. Commissioner Casey asked if Mr. Hentz played sports here in Mound, and if so what his opinion is of the athletic facilities available. Mr. Hentz stated he does not play in any of the sports in this area, as he has been on teams in Northeast Minneapolis and Chanhassen in the past. He has been looking for sports teams to join in the area, but has not as yet had the opportunity to play in this community. Commissioner Meyer asked if he would be involved with more hands-on responsibilities such as cleaning up the parks, Walk for Parks, and so on. Mr. Hentz stated he really would like that idea, es he did have the impression that this was something that the Commission did on a fairly regular basis, getting out in the 3 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission November 9, 2000 community for a hands on experience and personal involvement in the different areas and parks. Chair Beise invited Mr. Hentz to step out and send in Susan Taylor. Ms. Taylor, 3045 Dundee Lane, then addressed the Commission regarding her desire to serve on the POSAC in order to be involved in the interests of the community. Councilmember Weycker asked if there was $1000.00 to spend on the parks, what would it be spent on. Ms. Taylor stated she would first have to come up to speed on all the park needs in the City, as with all the requests that come before this body, the priorities would have to be examined first. Without this information she feels unqualified to answer the question. Commissioner Meyer asked if she would be involved with more hands-on responsibilities such as cleaning up the parks, Walk for Parks, and so on. Ms. Taylor stated these are great ideas, as it gives the Park Commissioners the opportunity to get out in the community and bring together the people involved in each park, as well as setting an example to the neighbors. Councilmember Bob Brown questioned what project, if one could be picked, would be the project that would take precedence over ail other projects. Ms. Taylor stated that the first thing she had noticed was that the Mound park system is not connected to one another. When kids and families come to the parks, they are coming down the middle of the street quite often. So, a trail system and sidewalks would be a priority to bring the community together. Commissioner Casey asked Ms. Taylor to describe the importance of comprehensive planning as she stated this in her application. Ms. Taylor replied that, as in the case of Counciimember Weycker's question, she did not have all the information and, therefore, could not make an educated answer. With a comprehensive plan, simply put there has been study done on what is present, what is needed, and a wish list of what is wanted. An overall vision is very important in order to make the small daily decisions as well as the larger decisions. Counciimember Brown questioned what Ms. Taylor would do to improve the sports in our community. Ms. Taylor stated that she has watched many of her neighbors play softball, soccer, and other sports. For the most part, there does not seem to be any major issues or problems as a spectator, but her viewpoint now is quite limited and there would always be room for improvement. 4 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission November 9, 2000 Chair Beise asked Ms. Taylor to give the Commission about five minutes and then they will be voting. Park Director Fackler stated that an effort was made to find the letter from Mr. Motika, but it was not able to be found, so the vote will have to be based on past interviews with Mr. Motika. Chair Beise reported that the first choice is was clear, but there is a tie on the second and third. More discussion was held to resolve this tie, and an additional vote was held on the two tied aplicants. Chair Beise then announced that the recommendation made is only a recommendation to the Council, who will make the final decision. Motion made by Casey, seconded by Meyer, to recommend Susan Taylor and Derrick Hentz be appointed to the available Park Commission vacancies, and to recommend that the Park Commission be expanded to six Park Commissioners and a Council representative, and recommend that Michael Schoephoerster be appointed to this Commission. Motion carried unanimously. 5 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWCO0 ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) ~,72-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 November 13, 2000 To: From: Subject: Pat Meisel, Mayor ~ Jim Fackler, Park Director,//~--'- Letter From Ron Motyka ~ At the November 9, 2000 POSAC meeting during the agenda item for interviewing applicants for the vacant POSAC position Council Member Bob Brown mentioned that the applicant Ron Motyka could not be present but he had sent a letter on November 4, 2000 to you and me. I acknowledged that I had not received it and I believe you noted the same. Today letters were found in the drop box in front of City Hall from Mr. Motyka for you and me. As Mr. Motyka notes that he had received my letter dated November 2, 2000 on November 4, 2000. If Mr. Motyka would have informed me of the problem on November 6,7,8 I would have t~lked to the City Manager to look at delaying the interviews or make other arrangements to allow him to interview. CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-06£0 November 21, 2000 Ron Motyka 1545 Bluebird Lane Mound, MN. 55364 Ref: Phone discussion on November 21,2000 referring to your letter Dated November 4, 2000. Dear Mr. Motyka, As we discussed in our phone conversation on Tuesday November 21, 2000 I would make inquires with the city department responsible for removing all correspondences put into the drop off box in front of City Hall. I was informed by the Finance Department that it is standard procedure for a city employee to daily open the drop off box prior to llam in order to collect payments for that days utility bank deposit. In following this procedure there were bank deposits made Monday November 6 through Thursday November 9 (City Hall was closed on November 10 in observance of Veteran's Day). On November 13, 2000 the drop off box was opened as described above and your letters addressed to Mayor Pat Meisel and myself were found. I want to assure you again that had I received your letter prior to the Park & Open Space Advisory Commission (POSAC) meeting of November 9, 2000 I would have reviewed it with City Manager Kandis Hanson for proper action. You also presented the question whether your application was part of POSAC consideration for the POSAC member vacancy. printecl on rec¥cled paper Again I will state that your application dated October 1, 2000 was included in the informational packet for the November 9, 2000 POSAC meeting and that your name was listed on the ballot of each sitting member that evening for consideration. Further into our discussion you asked if you needed to be present at the upcoming November 28, 2000 City Council meeting and if you did attend would you be allowed to present your application. My response was that it is your decision to attend and that Mayor/City Council will address any request for input from applicants. If there are any questions you would like me to respond to please feel free to contact me at 952-472-0611. Park Director cc: Mayor/City Council Kandis Hanson, City Manager Gino Businaro, Finance Director November 4, 2000 TO: Jim Fackler Park Director, City of Mound CC: Pat Meiset Mayor, City of Mound Mr. Fackler, Today, I received your invitation to meet with the Park and Open Soa~~ Committee to review my application to fill an open position, as a volunteer, on November 9, 2000. Unfortunately, my paying job requires me to travel, and being a fiscally responsible person. I follow my corporation's guide lines of booking all travel at least two weeks in advance, in order to take advantage of aidine discounts. That being said, I would like to point out that a fire.ay nctice is not sufficient lead time to make other arrangements. I can and do have the ability to schedule my own travel, but b~th 1, and the airlines need more than five days notice to make changes without penalt,~,. If I were to become a member of this ~mmittee, 1 would be able to fulfil[ the needs of both the c=mmittee and my -=mployer with diligent planning, and scheduling, rather than last minute hustling. I'm sorry that you and the ~mmittee didn't know ahead of time what you were going to be doing at this upcoming meeting, so that vo__u could have shown some fiscal responsibility, by c~ntaming the candidates in a more-timely manner. I would still like to be considered for this position, if other arrangements or times can be set for my response, and interview by the committee. You have my address. Sincerely; Concerned Citizen of Mound CITY OF MOUND 534.1 MAYWOO0 ROAD MCUN0. MINNESOTA 55364-~ 687 (612) ~.72-0600 FAX (612~ ,.t72-0620 November 2, 2000 TO: Applicant for Park & Open Space Advisory Commission Vacancy. FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Director SUBJECT: Interview Date, T~me & Location. Dear Applicant, The Park & Open Space Advisory Commission will be interviewing all applicants November 9, 2000 at 7:30 pm in the Council Chambers at Mound City Hall, 5341 Me.wood Road. Your presence is important at ~kis meeting, so t~hat you can highlight the application that you submitted. On behalf of the City of Mound I want to thank for your interest to serve as a volunteer. /~m ~Fa~kler Park Director CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD RCAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-16~7 (612) ,*72-0600 FAX (6121 ~.72-0620 November 1, 2000 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor/City Council FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Director SUBJECT: Interviews For POSAC Vacancy. On the November 9th Park and Open Space Advisory Commission (POSAC) agenda interviews will be held for the one member vacancy. The meeting will begin at 7:30pm in the Council Chambers and will be the first item to be heard. Enclosed are the application received by the deadline of October 27, 2000. Your attendance will be appreciated by the POSAC and staff. ~' printed on recycled paper APPLICANT INFO~TION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/C OMMITTEES/CO~MISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Date: Personal In.fommt~,n: Name: !'~ c. ,6 Address: Telephone: Home: {>'3a) q'~:~ - -/615 Work: Place of Employment: ~ e~-~tt, ( Aft/l(. ~F-.,..e . Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. o What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMIVIITTEES/C OMMISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) I Address: ,:~-----~'-'-5-0 /'" -~_-,_~-~. Telephone: Home: 5"/~ ~ .' 'c -.5< Work:, -' - n. SP Place of Employment: ?('.c~ W~ ~..:5.'-.'77'--:../ "' Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. .-., / e,/'. b/'~, ~-~ x'<. ~'-,.-'~-,. ...~-- ~,_ o What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMMITTEES/COM~MISSIONS [Please use black ink or type.) Date'. Name of Board: Personal In.formation: Name: Address: 2./[~ 5-'5- Telephone: Home: Place of Employment: i. ~? ~ "'- d~.~ ..... ., ~,.,, vc, kmtcc:, .-,'--~,: ...... *~'~* you '~",.'° had t you for b~ng a member offs 2. What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? .,. U.J k-es, L/g'7¥ APPLICANT IIYFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COM2~TTEES/COMIVIISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Date: October 20, 2000 Name of Board: Park Parsoual Information: Name: Susan Ta~.l or Address: 3045 Dundee Lane Telephone: Home: a72-~408 Work: 854-2844 PIace of Employment: Care Providers of Minnesota, Bloomington Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. Over the past 15 years, I have had extensive interaction with local and state government agencies. Serving as a housing manager and consultant fnr non-profit organizations, I was responsible for the development of new senior housing projects. As such, I presented plans to HRAs, economic development councils, planning commissions, park boards and city councils for consideration. I possess a keen understanding of the complexities of the local political arena, and the need for local government's responsibility to balance industry, local businessess, and the citizenry's interest. What sk/llsandabilihes do you haveth~ wo~d be helpful~ doing the work ofthis board/commi~e~commlssion? I possess excellent verbal and written skills, am quite analytical, and can facilitate complex, controversial issues through a consensus-building process. November 2000 City of Mound A RESOLUTION PROMOTING TOBACCO FREE PUBLIC PARKS, PUBLIC PLAYGROUNDS AND PUBLIC RECREATIONAL FACILITIES IN THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City Council of Mound recognizes that smoking and tobacco use is the greatest cause of cancer in the United States; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency (1993) has desi=o-nated environmental tobacco smoke as a Class A carcinogen, for which there are no known safe levels of exposure; and WHEREAS, tobacco contains nicotine which is an addictive and dangerous substance; and WHEREAS, most tobacco users become addicted before the age of nineteen; and WHEREAS, most youth who use tobacco obtain their tobacco from social sources; and WHEREAS, public use of tobacco provides greater opportunity for the social exchange of tobacco to youth; and WHEREAS, public display of tobacco use results in role modeling behavior and reinforces the norm that tobacco use is acceptable; and WHEREAS, role modeled behaviors significantly impact children and adolescents' behavior choices, WHEREAS, the City Council of Mound finds it is essential to promote tobacco free public parks, public playgrounds and public recreational facilities in order to encourage healthy choices for youth, to improve the health of all citizens and visitors, and to increase the aesthetic value of our community. November 2000 Now, therefore be it resolved: SECTION 1. Smoking and other uses of tobacco products are hereby strongly discouraged at public parks, public playgrounds and public recreational facilities in the City of Mound. SECTION 2. The Parks Department is hereby directed to cause conspicuous signs to be erected on public parks, public playgrounds and public recreational facilities and make available to the public the adopted policy in its entirety. SECTION 3. The City Council of Mound shall forward a copy of this resolution to the City of Mound's Athletic/Civic/Private Organizations. SIGNAGE BID FOR: BID RE~ ~,4~wl:~lNNV Fax 495~ crrv, ss, z~ l.T.h Thankyou! for' Not Using Tabacco The Health Consequences Of Smoking CANCER St~rgeo~ Ge~eraI 1982 U.S. DEPARTMENT OG HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES I:~.~lic Heatth Service Office on Sn-~:~kincj and Hea~th Rockville, Maryland 20857 For sste by tile Superit:telldent of Documents, U.S. Government Printtn[ Olfce Wa.sh[ngton, D.C. FOREWORD The 1982 report on The Health Consequences of Smoking presents a comprehensive evaluation of the relationship between cigarette smoking and cancer. Since 1937, cancer has been the second most important cause of death in the United States and will account for an estimated 430,000 deaths this year. Surveys have shown that Americans fear dying of cancer more than any other disease. We have yet to observe, however, a decline in the cancer mortality rate as is currently occurring for other chronic diseases, such as the 30 percent decline in the cardiovascular disease mortality rate and the 50 percent decline in the cerebrovascular disease mortality rate observed over the last three decades. The mortality rate for cancer has changed little over two decades, and that change has been a small, but measurable, increase. This increase in mortality has occurred in the face of remarkable improvements in survival rates [hr some cancer sites through earlier or better diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunate- Iv. however, these advances have failed to counter the remarkable i~creases in mortality from smoking-related cancers, many of which have a poor prognosis for long-term survival or cures. The Public Health Significance of this Report Cigarette smoking is the major single cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Tobacco's contribution to all cancer deaths is estimated to be 30 percent. This means we can expect that 129,000 Americans will die of cancer this year because of the higher overall cancer death rates that exist among smokers as compared with nonsmokers. Cigarette smokers have total cancer death rates two times greater than do nonsmokers. Heavy smokers have a three to four times greater excess risk of cancer mortality. [f large numbers of our population did not smoke, the cancer death rate in this country could be reduced, and instead of the small but continued increase in the total cancer death rate, there could be a substantial decline. There is no single action an individual can take to reduce the risk of cancer more effectively than quitting smoking, particularly cigarettes. 1256 The Causes of Cancer they lead people to smoke, drink, overeat, or enjoy some other harmful habit. In this respect it is perhaps relevant that studies of patients in mental hospitals provide no evidence of unexpected risks (Clemmesen and Hjalgrim-Jensen, 1977; Baldwin, 1979). Likewise, it might perhaps be that some form of immunological surveillance normally controls the development of certain types of cancer so that failure of such control would affect the onset rate of such cancers and that environmental factors affect the likelihood of such failure, but for the present this is all too speculative to quantify, as is the suggestion that some non-specific generalized effects of "aging" may be relevant. 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Trends Examination of the trends in American mortality from cancer over the last decade provides no reason to suppose that any major new hazards were introduced in the preceding decades, other than the well-recognized hazard of cigarette smoking, which has extended from men to women, and the cause (whatever it may be) of the increase in melanoma. Among people over 65 years of age there are increases in recorded mortality (es- pecially among the very old) from brain tumors and from some other types o£ tumor which are not mainly due to smoking, but these apparent increases among the old may chiefly reflect progressive improvements in the accuracy with which the causes of death of old people are recorded (appendix C) due not only to better medical technology but also, in large part, to better medical care for the elderly. Among people under 65 years of age, most of the trends in recorded mortality are downward, those for adults under the age of 45 being particularly favorable, which bodes well for the [uture. Some decreases are due to improved treat- ment (for example, in the case of Hodgkin's disease) while some are for unknown reasons (as in the case of cancer of the stomach) but cannot be accounted for by improvements in the outcome of treatment. Trends in recorded incidence rates (in which both fatal and non-fatal cases of cancer are counted) are difficult to interpret because of the difficulty of allow- ing for the effects of more complete registration and of more screening. The latter is liable to create spurious increases due to the classification as cancer of border- line cases, some of which would never have presented as clinical cancer within the subject's lifetime (as, for example, has probably happened in the case of cancer of the prostate or breast). These difficulties are sub- stantial when we compare recorded cancer incidence rates now with those a quarter of a century ago in particular registries, and other difficulties of noncom- parability appear to affect the comparison of the Second National Cancer Survey (1947/8) and Third National Cancer Survey (1969-71) with each other or particularly with the SEER program which has suc- ceeded them. For a few of the less common types of TABLE 20.--Proportions of cancer deaths attributed to various different factors Text section No. Factor or class of factors Percent of all cancer deaths Best Range of acceptable estimate estimates 5.1 Tobacco 30 25-40 5.2 Alcohol 3 2-4 5.3 Diet 35 10-70 5.4 Food additives ( 1 -5~-2 5.5 Reproductive~ and sexual be- 7 1-13 haviour 5.6 Occupation 4 2-8 5.7 Pollution 2 <1-5 5.8 Industrial products <1 <1-2 5.9 Medicines and medical procedures 1 0.5-3 5.10 Geophysical factors~ 3 2-4 5.11 Infection 10 ? 1-? 5.12 Unknown ? ? ° Allowing for a possibly protective effect of antioxidants and other preservatives, ~ See section 5.5 for intended meaning. ~ Only about 1%, not 3%. could reasonably be described as "avoidable" (see text). Geophysical factors also cause a much greater proportion of non-fatal cancers (up to 30% of all cancers. depending on ethnic mix and latitude) because of the importance of UV light in causing the relatively non-fatal basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of sunlight-exposed skin. cancer, large improvements in curability have occurred. and it is reasonable to hope that improvements will be demonstrated for breast cancer and perhaps for certain other common types of cancer as well. However, the apparent moderate improvements in 5-year relative survival rates over the past quarter o£ a century are, of course, themselves in part an artifact due to the same changes (in the completeness of case registration and in the nature of the lesions that are diagnosed) that have affected recorded incidence data. Gonsequently, as we are nbt convinced that changes in treatment have materially affected the outcome of most of the major types of potentially fatal cancer, it seems to us wiser for most wpes of cancer to estimate the real trends in disease onset rates chiefly from the recorded trends in mortality since 1950 among people under the age of 65. However, we look forward to the time when the SEER program will provide a sufficiently long and uniform series of data for trends in, incidence to be assessed independently of mortality. The fact that lung cancer rates in the United States. in comparison with those in other countries, are, if anything, somewhat lower than might be expected simply on the basis of the number of cigarettes Americans consume (appendix E) and the lack of any apparent overall upward trends in cancer other than those due to tobacco do not, of course, guarantee that apart from tobacco all is well. Indeed, although some thousands of Americans every year are now dying of asbestos-induced cancer, this public health disaster cannot be clearly seen in the national trends (except perhaps fc mas), so We have d people mi: rising rapi cause of Current C The es~: of enviro~ brought is less th interact ~, way desc: removal effect as cancers have be~ pos~ibt~ : in sectiot' to the factors. tobacco $imila: been ma, by Higgi 217 Bod hence att: table 20. rather "such intake, these diff of estim: except ti' total to Tobacco Returt: effects at which i: deaths a 130,000 though cancer d. ,*s We k table 20 formal different ~ of cases chemical Epstein's dealt wit? the revie,. (1980) o',. condusic q 0 perhaps for the still rare asbestos-induced mesothelio- mas), so an analysis of trends is clearly a crude tool. We have dwelt on it at length merely because so many people mistakenly believe most cancer onset rates to be rising rapidly and because that belief may in turn be a cause of mistaken priorities in cancer prevention. Current Causes The estimates of risk attributable to different classes of environmental agents that we made in section 5 are brought together in table 20. The sum of the estimates is less than 100% despite the fact that some agents interact with one another to produce the disease in the ~ay described in section 4.4. When this happens, the removal of either factor may have almost as much effect as the removal of both so that a few avoidable cancers are counted twice. The sum would, however, have been a good deal more than 100% if it had been possible to characterize the unknown factors referred to in section 5.12. The firmest estimates in table 20 relate to the effects of tobacco, alcohol, and geophysical factors, while by far the largest estimates relate to tobacco and die~. Similar but less detailed sets of estimates which have been made previously by Wynder and Gori (1977) and by Higginson and Muir (1979) are summarized in table 21.'s Both sets refer to cases rather than to deaths and hence attribute larger proportions to sunlight than does table 20, and Higginson and Muir refer to "life-style" rather than to diet, meaning by it, however, factors "such as lack of dietary fiber, excess fat and caloric intake, and possibly hormone carcinogenesis." Despite these differences, the patterns described in the three sets of estimates resemble one another reasonably closely, except that we have preferred not to try to force the total to add up to 100%. Tobacco Returning to our table 20, the only cause whose effects are both large and reliably known is tobacco, which in 1978 accounted for about 120,000 cancer deaths and which will probably account for between I$0,000 and 140,000 U.S. cancer deaths in 1981. Al- though it appears inevitable that the percentage of U.S. cancer deaths due to tobacco will continue to rise for at 4s We know ol no other explicit sets of estimates with which our ~able 20 can be compared directly. In particular, we know oi no formal attempt to make quantiu~tive estimates oi the contribution o! different causes which embodies the common belief that the majority oi c~es d cancer could be prevented by the stringent control o! chemical pollution of air, food. water, and o! occupational exposure. Epstein's popularization oi this belief (1978, 1979. 1981b) has been d~lt with elsewhere (section 4.1 and Peto, 1980). Finally, although ;he review o~ epidemiological knowledge by Maclure and MacMahon (1980) overlaps considerably with ou~ subject matter (and with our conclusions), it do~ not contain explicit numerical estimates. Summary and Conclusions 1257 TxaI~ 21.--Proport/o~ o/ cancer caz~s attr/bsted to ~ious diff~r~ faet, o~ 8'ff oth~r authors Percent of all cancer cases in: England, Birming- United States, Factor or clas~ ham region, based based on Wynder of factors on Higginson and and Gori (1977)' Muir (1979) Male Female Male Female Tobacco 30 7 28 8 Tobacco/alcohol 5 3 4 Diet -- -- 40 57 Lifestyle 30 63 -- -- Occupation 6 2 4 2 Sunlight 10 1_0~ 8 8 Ionizing radiations 1 1J Iatrogenic 1 1 -- -- Exogenous hormones -- -- -- 4 Congenital 2 2~ 16 20 Unknown 15 I · Deduced from histograms. Non-environmental factors equated with congenital and unknown. least a few more years, reaching about 33% by the mid- 1980's, non-prohibitive legislation (and the other sources of changes in public awareness discussed in section 5.1) may materially reduce national cigarette usage, while changes to lower tar cigarettes can materially reduce the risk per cigarette. Because the likelihood of such changes cannot be foreseen, longer term prediction of the percentage of U.S. cancer deaths ascribable to tobacco is not reliable. These estimates of the effects of smoking are subject to some small uncertainty because there may be some misdiagnosis of lung cancers as other cancers and vice versa and also because of the need to generalize from the experience of samples of the non-smoking population (whose diet, occupation, and socioeconomic status may not be typical of the country as a whole) in order to estimate the small number (n, 12,000) of lung cancers not due to tobacco which must be subtracted from the large number (~100,0~0) o{ U.S. deaths attributed each year to cancer of the lung. Both qualifications are well recognized. Neither affects the validity of the conclusion that smoking is a cause of a large proportion of all cancer deaths, which is based on massive evidence from many sources. They do mean that it is impossible to be sure of the exact attributable risk. However, the current figure cannot be less than 25% or more than 40%. Cigarette smoking also causes many deaths from causes other than cancer, so there are unlikely to be any substantial hidden dangers in its avoidance. The most important area of uncertainty, which could be ad- dressed by the large case-control study of lung cancer which we have recommended, concerns the relative effects ol the various low-tar and other types of cigarette. If, as we suspect, the hazards of long-term use o{ low-tat cigarettes are smaller relative to high-tar dgarettes than is suggested by the report of the Surgeon General (1981), this.might be of great public 1258 The Causes of Cancer health significance, yet rel/able information remains elusive. Diet We have attributed the largest risk to dietary factors for reasons that are discussed in detail in section 5.3. It must be emphasized that the figure chosen is highly speculative and chiefly refers to dietary factors which are not yet reliably identified. Experimental findings and human observation alike provide many indications that dietary factors are of major importance in deter- mining the risk of cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, some cancers of the female sex organs, and epithelial cancers in general, but there is as yet litde decisive evidence on which firm conclusions can be based. From our review in section 5.$ of various current lines of research into dietary factors, it is probable that the most important would turn out to be not the ingestion of traces of powerful carcinogens or precarcinogens (although these should certainly be guarded against) but rather nutritional factors, ranging from gross aspects of diet to vitamins, trace elements, and other micronutrients which may either enhance or inhibit carcinogenesis. (If any minor components of diet do indeed materially reduce cancer risks, then their dis- covery might be of more immediate practical value than the discovery of harmful factors, for prescription may be more rapidly acceptable than proscription.) Several promising hypotheses have been developed sufficiently clearly for them to be tested in practice, and more definite evidence should be obtained within the next decade or two, especially if large, randomly controlled evaluations of certain of the more promising methods of intervention are undertaken. [Bailar'~ (1979) plea that preventive measures be evaluated by scientific criteria as strict as those for laboratory science has our full support.] Other Factors None of the other factors in table 20 can approach the importance of tobacco or the probable importance of diet. One of the larger remaining percentages, however, relates to those aspects of sexual and repro- ductive behavior that affect the incidence of cancers of the breast, reproductive, and genital organs. The figure cited allows only for the known effects of sexual experience and the favorable effects of pregnancy on the incidence of cancer in women, but it is not impossible that some aspects of sexual behavior also affect the risk of cancer of the prostate and perhaps of the testis in men by, for example, infection or modifi- cation of hormonal secretion. For males, however, other determinants of hormonal status may be more important, and in the absence of clear leads the reasons for the variation in the incidence of specifically male cancers have been classed here as "unknown." It cannot, of course, be expected that sexual behavior and reproduction will be much influenced by knowledge that they are likely to affect the incidence of cancer decades hence. When, however, we have mom detaile~ knowledge of the ways in which the various disease are produced, it may prove possible to diminish th~ risks by preventing infection, stimulating or inhibitin~ hormonal secretion, or modifying its effects. The proportion of cancers that we have attributed tc the specific hazards of occupation, pollution, the use o industrial products, medicines, and medical procedure: are individually small. That does not, of course, impl? that some of them are not of immense importance tc sections of the population on whom the risks arc concentrated, but it does mean that their control will have relatively little effect on the total incidence o: cancer in the whole country. The uncertainties in ou~ estimates have been emphasized, and a large case-con. trol study of lung cancer could greatly reduce the uncertainty in the proportion of cancers currentlx ascribable to occupational factors in particular as wefl as perhaps identifying and therefore controlling more rapidly than might otherwise be the case some hithertc unrecognized occupational hazards. Once recognized, occupational hazards can usually be reduced or elimi- mated by immediately practicable means, which makes their identification particularly valuable. It is odd that despite the resources that are currently being devoted to laboratory tests of chemicals and regulation of occupa. tional factors so little effort is being made to observe in a systematic way what is actually happening to the large numbers of people who might be at risk. Future Causes Our estimates of the small proportions of current cancer mortality due to occupation, pollution, etc. relate, of course, chiefly to those factors for which it has been possible to secure some direct evidence of an effect on humans. Many substances have begun to be used in recent years that are mutagenic to bacteria and carcinogenic in one or more species of laboratory animals. How far exposure to these substances will contribute to the production of cancer in humans in the future is a matter for speculation. On general bio- logical principles, which we have discussed in section 4.2, it must be assumed that some (though not all) of these substances will involve a risk of cancer and, even though the doses to which humans are exposed are commonly minute in comparison with those used in laboratory experiments, this is not always the case and some harmful effects must be anticipated. Cancer in humans is seldom produced until 10 to 20 years after exposure to the carcinogenic agent begins, and even then the risk may be extremely small in comparison with what it would be if exposure were to continue for several more decades. The human evi- dence that is currently available does not allow us to express any confident opinion about the extent of the harm that the introduction of these substances may or may not do in the future. The trends that are being recorded do not, however, suggest that the United States (or Britain: see Doll, 1979b) is beginning to experience an epidemic of cancer due to new factors. Thursday, November 2, 2000 Pediatrics. Volume 99(4).April 1997.639-642 Pediatrics © American Academy of Pediatrics, 1997. All Rights Reserved. Volume 99(4) April 1997 pp 639-642 Page: 1 Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A Hazard to Children [American Academy Of Pedia~cs] Committee on Environmental Health. The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. ~ , .... ~ Oontents I~ Go to ... Full Text Manager I About this Journal [ ~ I Logoff Outline · Abstract · EFFECTS OF TOBACCO SMOKE ON CHILDREN o Passive Smoking and Lower Respiratory_ Illness o Passive Smoking and Serious Infectious Illnesses o Passive Smokinc, and Middle Ear ~ffusions o Passive Smoking and Asthma o Passive Smokine and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome o Passive Smokine and Lipid Profiles o Passive Smoking and Cancer · CONCLUSION · RECOMMENDATIQNS ® REFERENCES Abstract Results of epidemiologic studies provide strong evidence that exposure of children to environmental tobacco smoke is associated with increased rates of lower respiratory illness and increased rates of middle ear effusion, asthma, and sudden infant death syndrome. Exposure during childhood may also be associated with development of c~ncer during adulthood. This statement reviews the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke on children and offers pediatricians a strategy for promoting a smoke-free environment. EFFECTS OF TOBACCO SMOKE ON CHILDREN~ In 1992, 48 million American adults (26.5%) currently smoked cigarettes. [11 A recent national survey indicated that 43% of children 2 months to 11 years of age live in homes with at least one smoker. ~ Because many young children spend a large proportion of their time indoors, [31 they may have significant exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Environmental tobacco smoke from cigarettes, cigars, and pipes is composed of more than 3800 different chemical compounds. [4] Concentrations of respirable suspended particulate matter (particulates of< 2.5 micro meter) can be two to three times higher in homes with smokers than in homes with no smokers. [51 Cigarette smoking is the most important factor determining the level of suspended particulate matter and respimble sulfates and particles in indoor air. [6.71 Passive smoking has a harmful effect on the respiratory health of children. [4.8.91 This statement reviews the evidence that children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke have higher rates of lower respiratory illness during their first year of life, higher rates of middle ear effusion, and higher rates of sudden infant death syndrome. In addition, children with asthma whose parents smoke have more severe symptoms and more frequent exacerbations. Passive Smoking and Lower Respiratory IIIness*_l The first effect of passive smoking to be documented in children was an increased rate of illnesses affecting the lower respiratory tract. Cameron [101 reported a positive correlation between the presence of a smoker in the home and the incidence of perceived disease in children. Harlap and Davies [11] interviewed pregnant women to determine their smoking habits and then studied hospital admissions for infants younger than 1 year. The infants whose mothers smoked were 38% more likely to be admitted to the hospital for bronchitis and pneumonia than were those whose mothers did not smoke. This increased likelihood was mainly among infants 6 to 9 months of age; admissions increased with the number of cigarettes smoked by the infants' mothers. Rantakallio fl21 showed that, among children younger than I year, those with mothers who smoked cigarettes were almost four times as likely to be hospitalized as were the infants of nonsmoking mothers, and the number of hospitalizations increased with the number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day. During the first 5 years of life, pneumonia and bronchitis were about twice as likely and acute nasopharyngitis and sinusitis in the upper respiratory tract were about 1.5 times as likely to develop in children whose mothers smoke. Colley et al [131 found a consistent gradient in the incidence of pneumonia and bronchitis in the child's first year of life in relation to the parents' smoking habits. Infants with two parents who smoked were more than twice as likely to have had pneumonia and bronchitis as were infants with parents who did not smoke. Fergusson et al [[4] showed that pneumonia and bronchitis in an infant's fn'st year of life increased with increasing maternal smoking in an approximately linear manner: increases of five cigarettes a day resulted in an increase of 2.5 to 3.5 incidents of lower respiratory illness per 100 children at risk. Passive Smoking and Serious Infectious IIInesses*-I Berg and colleagues [ 151 determined that among children 3 to 59 months of age, passive smoking was associated with an almost fourfold r~sk of a serious infectious illness requiring hospitalization. httl~:/Iwww.biomedsearch.lib.umn.edu/ovidweb/ovidweb.cgi? TafullText & R$.BIB.search%TcO%Tc Full+Text &D= ItalI&S.AIPPPPOPHDKCAK#40 Thursday, November 2, 2000 Pediatrice, Volume 99(4).April 1997.639-642 Page: 2 Passive Smoking and Middle Ear Effusions~ era case-control study of risk factors for persistent middle ear effusions in Seattle, Kraemer and colleagues il61 reported that children who lived in ebolds where more than three packs of cigarettes were smoked per day were more than four times as likely to be admitted to the hospital for tympanostomy placement than were children whose parents did not smoke. Iversen and colleagues [ 17] studied children up to 7 years of age in Danish day care centers and demonstrated that middle ear effusion as measured by tympanometry was about 60% more likely to develop in children whose parents smoked. They estimated the overall fraction of middle ear effusion attributable to passive smoking to be 15%. To determine risk factors for glue ear (serous otitis media), Black [181 performed a case-control study of 150 children 4 m 9 years old undergoing myringotomy in Oxtbrd, England. Children undergoing myringotomy were about 50% more likely to have lived in households where someone smoked than were control children. Hinton [ 19] studied 115 children undergoing ear tube insertion for otitis media with effusion and a control group of 36 children from an orthoptic clinic. Children admitted for ear operations were more likely to have at least one parental smoker at home than the children in the control group. Etzel et al [20] studied 132 children in a day care center to determine whether passive smoking was associated with an increased risk of middle ear effusion during the 18-month period between 6 and 24 months of age. In this study, the children were classified as exposed or not exposed to cigarette smoke on the basis of serum cotinine concentrations at 1 year of age. Middle ear effusion was diagnosed with the use of pneumatic otoscopy. The 45 children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke had an average of 7.1 episodes of middle ear effusion between 6 and 24 months of age, whereas the 87 children unexposed to environmental tobacco smoke had 5.8 episodes during that period. The average duration of middle ear effusion was 28 days among those in the exposed group and 19 days among those in the unexposed group. An estimated 8% of the middle ear effusions were attributed to exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Strachan et al [21l studied the relationship between passive smoking and middle ear effusion in 736 7-year-old school children in Edinburgh. In this study, investigators used objective measures of passive smoking and middle ear effusion, salivary cotinine concentrations, and impedance tympanometry. Children with type B tympanograms in one or both ears were categorized as having middle ear effusions. The results of this study indicated that detectable salivary cotinine was associated with type B tympanograms, even after adjustment for sex and the type of housing in which the children lived (rented versus owned). The authors estimated that at least one third of the cases of middle ear effusion among children in this age group may have been attributable to passive smoking. Owen and colleagues [221 monitored 435 healthy children by tympanometry in the home every 2 to 4 weeks until 2 years of age. Of the children, 41% were exposed to household cigarette smoke. The authors found a significant association between the number of cigarettes smoked by household members and the frequency of otitis media with effusion during the second year of life. Ey and colleagues [23] found that heavy maternal smoking (20 or more cigarettes per day) was a significant risk factor for recurrent otitis media during the first year of life. No association was found with paternal smoking. Passive Smoking and Asthma~ ~lljldren with asthma whose parents smoke may have more frequent exacerbations and more severe symptoms. [24-351 In one of the few interventions reported /re literature, Murray and Morrison [.301 demonstrated that if parents expose their children with asthma to less cigarette smoke, the asthmatic symptoms the nIl~dren have will be less severe. Passive Smoking and Sudden Infant Death Syndromeq A growing body of evidence links exposure to enviroumental tobacco smoke to sudden infant death syndrome. [36481 This relationship seems to be independent of birth weight and gestational age. Passive Smoking and Lipid Profiles +_l Passive smoking has also been reported to alter lipid profiles in adolescents. Feldman et al [491 studied 391 nonsmoking adolescent students and found that those with elevated plasma cotinine concentrations had an 8.9% greater ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and 6.8% lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol than those with lower plasma cotinine concentxations. This may shed light on the mechanism of increased risk of coronary heart disease in passive smokers. Passive Smoking and Cancer~ Many studies link passive smoking to lung cancer in nonsmoking adults living with spouses who smoke. [50-571 The US Environmental Protection Agency [91 reviewed this subject and concluded that environmental tobacco smoke is a group A human carcinogen, the classification used when sufficient evidence from epidemiologic studies exists to support a causal association between exposure and cancer. A small number of studies have examined the relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke during childhood and cancer risk. Sandier and colleagues i'581 found that the overall cancer risk was greater for individuals with exposures to environmental tobacco smoke during both childhood and adulthood than for individuals with exposure during only one period. When specific cancer sites or types were considered, Sandier et al [~81 found that leukemia and lymphoma among adults were significantly related to exposure to maternal passive smoke before 10 years of age. [~9] CONCLUSION~ Results of epidemiologic studies provide evidence that exposure of children to environmental tobacco smoke is associated with increased rates of lower respiratory illness and increased rates of middle ear effusion, asthma, and sudden infant death syndrome. Exposure during childhood to environmental tobacco smoke may also be associated with development of cancer during adulthood. RECOMMENDATIONS +_J l. Pediatricians should take smoking histories from parents and guardians of children. 2. Pediatricians should inform parents about the health hazards of passive smoking and provide guidance on smoking cessation. 3. Pediatricians should set an example by not using tobacco products. Odiatricians promote policies ensure waiting rooms, hospitals are should that their offices, and smoke free. 5. Pediatricians should urge that sales of all tobacco products be banned in pediatric hospitals and other facilities in which children receive care. 6. Pediatricians should work with school boards to ban smoking in schools and on school property, including in teachers' lounges. Thumday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke - Setting the Record http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/strsls.html#top o! page Straight [Erwiror~rn~n..tai [Protecticm Age..ncy EPA 402-F-94-005 June 1994 Setting the Record Straight: Secondhand Smoke is A Preventable Health Risk Disclaimer: Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer The Environmental Protection Agency firmly maintains that the bulk of the scientific evidence demonstrates that secondhand smoke -- environmental tobacco smoke, or "ETS" -- causes lung cancer and other significant health threats to children and adults. EPA's report ("Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders," EPA/600/6-90/006F) was peer-reviewed by 18 eminent, independent scientists who unanimously endorsed the study's methodology and conclusions. Since EPA's 1993 report which estimated the dsks posed by ETS, numerous independent health studies have presented an impressive accumulating body of evidence that :onfirms and strengthens the EPA findings. It is widely accepted in the scientific and )ublic health communities that secondhand smoke poses significant health risks to ;hildren and adults. A U.S. District Court decision has vacated several chapters of the EPA document "Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders" that lserved as the basis for EPA's classification of secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen and estimates that ETS causes 3,000 lung cancer deaths in non-smokers each year. The ruling was largely based on procedural grounds. EPA is aooealin0 this decision. None of the findings concerning the sedous respiratory health effects of secondhand smoke in children were challenged. Introduction Qlassification of Secondhand Smoke a5 a Known Human (Group A) Qar~;ino0en The EDidemioloQv Studies How Bio a Luno Cancer Risk for Adults? The Risks to Children are Widely Acknowledged Other Risks Tobacco Industry Media CamDaion The 11 U.S. LunQ Cancer Studies Studies Comoleted Since Release of the EPA Reoort 90% vs. 95% Confidence Intervals Confounders "The Threshold Theory" "Cioarette EQuivalents" Re~i(:;lel~tial ExPosures Translated to the Workolace The Conoressional Research Service (CRS~ Report Cigarette Prohibition Secondhand Smoke LeQislation For Further Information Introduction In early 1993, EPA released a report (Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders; EPA/600/6-90/006 F) that evaluated the respiratory health effects from breathing secondhand smoke Page: 1 Thursday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke - Setting the Reco~d http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/strsfs.hlml#top of page Straight (als0 called environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)). In that report, EPA concluded that secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in adult nonsmokers and impairs the respiratory health of children. These findings are very similar to ones made previously by the National Academy of Sciences and the U.S. Surgeon General. The EPA report classified secondhand smoke as a Group A carcinogen, a designation which means that there is sufficient evidence that the substance causes cancer in humans. The Group A designation has been used by EPA for only 15 other pollutants, including asbestos, radon, and benzene. Only secondhand smoke has actually been shown in studies to cause cancer at typical environmental levels. EPA estimates that approximately 3,000 American nonsmokers die each year from lung cancer caused by secondhand smoke. Every year, an estimated 150,000 to 300,000 children under 18 months of age get pneumonia or bronchitis from breathing secondhand tobacco smoke. Secondhand smoke is a dsk factor for the development of asthma in children and worsens the condition of up to one million asthmatic children. EPA has clear authority to inform the public about indoor air pollution health dsks and what can be done to reduce those dsks. EPA has a particular responsibility to do everything possible to warn of risks to the health of children. A recent high profile advertising and public relations campaign by the tobacco industry may confuse the American public about the dsks of secondhand smoke. EPA believes it's time to set the record straight about an indisputable fact: secondhand smoke is a real and preventable health risk. EPA absolutely stands by its scientific and well documented report. The report was the subject of an extensive open review both by the public and by EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB), a panel of independent scientific experts. Virtually every one of the arguments about lung cancer advanced by the tobacco industry and its consultants was addressed by the SAB. The panel concurred in the methodology and unanimously endorsed the conclusions of the final report. The report has also been endorsed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the National Cancer Institute, the Surgeon General, and many major health organizations. Go back to tOP Classification of Secondhand Smoke as a Known Human (Group A) Carcinogen The finding that secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in nonsmoking adults is based on the total weight of the available evidence and is not dependent on any single analysis. This evidence includes several important facts. First, it is indisputable that smoking tobacco causes lung cancer in humans, and there is no evidence that there is a threshold below which smoking will not cause cancer. Second, although secondhand smoke is a dilute mixture of mainstream" smoke exhaled by smokers and sidestream" smoke from the burning end of a cigarette or other tobacco product, it is chemically similar to the smoke inhaled by smokers, and contains a number of carcinogenic Page: 2 Thursday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke - Setting the Record http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/strsfs.html#top of page Straight compounds. Third, there is considerable evidence that large numbers of people who do not smoke are exposed to, absorb, and metabolize significant amounts of secondhand smoke. Fourth, there is supporting evidence from laboratory studies of the ability of secondhand smoke both to cause cancer in animals and to damage DNA, which is recognized by scientists as being an instrumental mechanism in cancer development. Finally, EPA conducted multiple analyses on the then-available 30 epidemiology studies from eight different countries which examined the association between secondhand smoke and lung cancer in women who never smoked themselves but were exposed to their husband's smoke. Since the epidemiology studies are the major thrust of the tobacco industry arguments against the EPA report, these studies are examined in more detail below. Go back to top The Epidemiology Studies The most important aspect of the review of the epidemiology studies is the remarkable consistency of results across studies that support a causal association between secondhand smoke and lung cancer. In assessing the studies several different ways, it becomes clear that the extent of the consistency defies attribution to chance. When looking only at the simple measure of exposure of whether the husband ever smoked, 24 of 30 studies reported an increase in risk for nonsmoking women with smoking husbands. Since many of these studies were small, the chance of declaring these increases statistically significant was small. Still, nine of these were statistically significant, and the probability that this many of the studies would be statistically significant merely by chance is less than 1 in 10 thousand. The simple overall comparison of risks in ever vs. never exposed to spousal smoking tends to hide true increases in risk in two ways. First, it categorizes many women as never exposed who actually received exposure from sources other than spousal smoking. It also includes some women as exposed who actually received little exposure from their husband's smoking. One way to correct for this latter case is to look at the women whose husbands smoked the most. When one looks at the 17 studies that examined cancer effects based on the level of exposure of the subjects, every study found an increased lung cancer risk among those subjects who were most exposed. Nine were statistically significant. The probability of 9 out of 17 studies showing statistically significant results occurring by chance is less than I in ten million. Probably the most important finding for a causal relationship is one of increasing response with increasing exposure, since such associations cannot usually be explained by other factors. Such exposure-response trends were seen in all 14 studies that examined the relationship between level of exposure and effect. In 10 of the studies the trends were statistically significant. The probability of this happening by chance is less than I in a billion . It is unprecedented for such a consistency of results to be seen in Page: 3 Thursday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke - Setting the Recoil http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/strsfs.hlml~op of page Straight epidemiology studies of cancer from environmental levels of a pollutant. One reason is that it is extremely difficult to detect an effect when virtually everyone is exposed, as is the case with secondhand smoke. However, consistent increased dsks for those most exposed and consistent trends of increasing exposure showing an increasing effect provide strong evidence that secondhand smoke increases the risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Go back to top How Big a Lung Cancer Risk for Adults? The evidence is clear and consistent: secondhand smoke is a cause of lung cancer in adults who don't smoke. EPA has never claimed that minimal exposure to secondhand smoke poses a huge individual cancer risk. Even though the lung cancer risk from secondhand smoke is relatively small compared to the risk from direct smoking, unlike a smoker who chooses to smoke, the nonsmoker's dsk is often involuntary. In addition, exposure to secondhand smoke varies tremendously among exposed individuals. For those who must live or work in close proximity to one or more smokers, the dsk would certainly be greater than for those less exposed. EPA estimates that secondhand smoke is responsible for about 3,000 lung cancer deaths each year among nonsmokers in the U.S.; of these, the estimate is 800 from exposure to secondhand smoke at home and 2,200 from exposure in work or social situations. back to too The Risks to Children are Widely Acknowledged The conclusion that secondhand smoke causes respiratory effects in children is widely shared and virtually undisputed. Even the tobacco industry does not contest these effects in its media and public relations campaign. EPA estimates that every year, between 150,000 and 300,000 children under 1-1/2 years of age get bronchitis or pneumonia from breathing secondhand tobacco smoke, resulting in thousands of hospitalizations. In children under 18 years of age, secondhand smoke exposure also results in more coughing and wheezing, a small but significant decrease in lung function, and an increase in fluid in the middle ear. Children with asthma have more frequent and more severe asthma attacks because of exposure to secondhand smoke, which is also a dsk factor for the onset of asthma in children who did not previously have symptoms. back to too Other Risks Secondhand smoke contains strong irritants and sensitizers and many adults, as well as children, suffer irritation and other acute effects whenever they are exposed to secondhand smoke. In addition, there is mounting evidence that exposure to secondhand smoke can have an effect on the cardiovascular system, although the EPA report does not address this issue. Go back tO top Tobacco Industry Media Campaign The tobacco industry is raising numerous issues which may distract the Page: 4 Thursday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke- Setting the Record htlp:/Iwww.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/strsls.html#top of page Straight public from the fact that secondhand smoke poses a real and preventable health risk. The tobacco industry neither acknowledges nor disputes EPA's conclusions of respiratory effects in children. It focuses instead on EPA°s findings on lung cancer. The overall thrusts of the tobacco industry's arguments are that EPA manipulated the lung cancer data to come to a predetermined conclusion. The industry also argues that a nonsmoker's exposure to secondhand smoke is so small as to be insignificant. The argument on minimal exposure is belied both by the acute irritation and respiratory effects and the fallacy of the cigarette equivalents" approach discussed below. Responses to the specific criticisms of EPA's assessment of the lung cancer data follow. Go ba(;;l(, tO tod The 11 U.S. Lung Cancer Studies Critics of the EPA report argue that by normal statistical standards, none of the 11 U.S. studies included in the EPA report showed a statistically significant increase in the simple overall risk measure, and that EPA should therefore have been unable to conclude that secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in nonsmokers. These critics are misrepresenting a small part of the total evidence on secondhand smoke and lung cancer. The consistency of study results in the highest exposure category and exposure-response trends discussed above also apply to the U.S. studies. For example, seven of the 11 U.S. studies had fewer than 45 cases, making statistical comparisons difficult. Nonetheless, eight of the 11 had increased overall risks, and for the seven studies which reported on dsks by amount of exposure, the highest exposure groups in all seven had increased dsks. While the 11 U.S. studies are not, by themselves, conclusive, they do support the conclusion that secondhand smoke is causally associated with lung cancer. Go back to tod Studies Completed Since Release of the EPA Report Critics claim that had EPA not excluded" the recent Brownson study, the Agency could not have concluded that secondhand smoke causes cancer. In fact, four new lung cancer epidemiology studies, including the Brownson study, have been published since the literature review cutoff date for the 1993 EPA report, and all support EPA's conclusions. Three of these are large U.S. studies funded, at least in part, by the National Cancer Institute. A 1992 study of Florida women by Stockwell et al. found a 60% overall increased risk of lung cancer from exposure to their husband's smoke, with significant results for both the highest exposure group and the exposure-response trend. The 1992 study of Missouri women by Brownson et al. found no overall increased risk, but did demonstrate a significant increase in risk in the highest spousal smoking exposure group and a positive exposure-response trend. The 1994 study by Fontham et al. of women in two California and three Southern cities is the largest case-control study on the subject ever conducted and is considered by EPA to be the best designed study on secondhand smoke and lung cancer conducted to date. This study found significantly increased dsks for overall exposure and in the highest exposure group and a strong positive exposure-response relationship. These findings were significant not only for exposure from spouses, but also for exposure in the workplace and in social situations. Page: 5 Thursday, November 2, 2000 Go back to top Secondhand Smoke - Selting the Record Straight http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/strsfs.html#top of page 90% vs. 95% Confidence Intervals Critics of the EPA report have charged that EPA changed the confidence interval in order to come to a predetermined conclusion. However, the conclusion that secondhand smoke is a known human carcinogen simply does not hinge on whether or not a 95% or 90% confidence interval" was used. A confidence interval is used to display variability in relative risk estimates in the epidemiology studies. As discussed above, the Group A designation is based on the total weight of the available evidence. The consistency of results that are seen in the numerous studies examined lead to a certainty of greater than 99.9% that secondhand smoke increases the risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Use of what is called in statistics a one-tailed test of significance," which often corresponds to a 90% confidence interval, is a standard and appropriate statistical procedure in certain circumstances. The one-tailed test" is used when there is pdor evidence that if there is an effect from a substance, it is highly likely to be an adverse rather than a protective effect, or vice versa. In the case of secondhand smoke, an extensive database exists for direct smoking indicating that if chemically similar secondhand smoke also has a lung cancer effect, this effect is likely to be similarly adverse. EPA used one-tailed significance tests for lung cancer in both external drafts of the dsk assessment document as well as the final report. Ninety percent confidence intervals were also used in other EPA cancer risk assessments, including methylene chloride, coke oven emissions, radon, nickel, and dioxin. In the non-cancer respiratory effects portions of the report, two-tailed tests" and 95% confidence intervals were used, since there was less prior evidence from smokers to suggest that secondhand smoke would cause bronchitis, pneumonia, and ear infections in children. back to top The Meta-analysis Meta-analysis was used for the lung cancer data as an objective method of combining results from many studies and was specifically endorsed by the SAB for use with this database. Some cdtics argue both that the meta-analysis was not an appropriate technique, and that had EPA included the Brownson study (addressed above) in the meta-analysis of overall spousal exposure, EPA could not possibly have classified secondhand smoke as a known human carcinogen. This just isn't true. The finding that secondhand smoke is a known cause of lung cancer in Thursday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke - Salting the Record http:l/www.epa.govliaq/pubs/strsfs.html#lop o! page Slraight that could be responsible for the lung cancer increases observed in nonsmokers instead of secondhand smoke. The tobacco industry and its consultants have suggested, for example, that nonsmoking wives might share in the same poor dietary habits as their smoking husbands, increasing their dsk. The consistency of results across different countries where lifestyle factors, including diet, vary, argues against confounding. For example, while the tobacco industry theorizes that a high fat diet is a confounding factor, the studies from Japan, where dietary fat intake is among the lowest in the wodd, show a strong dose-response relationship for secondhand smoke and lung cancer. The EPA report did examine the available data for six potential confounders such as occupation, dietary factors, and history of lung disease, and concluded that none was likely to explain the lung cancer increases seen in the studies. The 1994 Fontham et al. study controlled for diet and other potential confounders, and concluded, These observations indicate that the strong association in this study between adult secondhand smoke exposure and lung cancer risk cannot be attributed to any likely confounder. Go back to too "The Threshold Theory" Although some have argued that tobacco smoke cannot cause cancer below a certain level, there is no evidence that this threshold exists. In the absence of such evidence, carcinogens at any level are considered by EPA to increase dsk somewhat, although the degree of risk certainly is reduced as exposure decreases. The increased risks observed in the secondhand smoke epidemiology studies are further evidence that any threshold for secondhand smoke would have to be at very Iow levels. Go back to too "Cigarette Equivalents" The tobacco industry uses the cigarette equivalent" method of comparing smokers' and nonsmokers' exposures to a single component of tobacco smoke to infer that a nonsmoker's exposure to tobacco smoke is insignificant. However, the cigarette equivalent method has no scientific support, and was rejected by the SAB panel that reviewed the EPA report. Among the many problems with this method is the fact that while secondhand smoke and mainstream smoke contain the same approximately 4,000 compounds, their ratios of individual compounds differ by factors in the thousands. Thus, there is no single compound in tobacco smoke that is an adequate indicator for drawing such comparisons. An RJ Reynolds newspaper ad, while utilizing the method, acknowledges it may not be relevant for assessing risk from secondhand smoke. Go back to too Residential Exposures Translated to the Workplace The tobacco industry frequently argues that because most studies were based on residential exposures, secondhand smoke has not been shown to be a hazard in the workplace. A substance capable of causing cancer in one environment is certainly capable of causing it in any other environment Page: 7 LtqOI Thumday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke - Setting the Record http:llwww.epa.govliaqlpubslstrsls.html#top o! page Straight where exposures are comparable, as is the case with residential and workplace exposure to secondhand smoke. In fact, the 1994 Fontham study found a slightly higher risk for workplace exposure than for residential exposures. Go back to top The Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report The RJ Reynolds' media campaign cites a report prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) on cigarette taxes to fund health care reform to argue that CRS believes that the epidemiological evidence on secondhand smoke and health effects is weak and uncertain." However, CRS has not taken a position on either EPA's risk assessment or the health effects of passive smoking. Two economists from CRS, citing material largely prepared by the tobacco industry, included a discussion of EPA's risk assessment in an economic analysis of a cigarette excise tax proposal to fund health care reform. In EPA's view, the CRS economists' cursory look at the issues is not comparable to the exhaustive analyses and rigorous review process which EPA undertook when examining the extensive database on secondhand smoke and respiratory health. EPA is confident that a comprehensive analysis of the secondhand smoke database by expert scientists from CRS, with adequate peer review, will come to conclusions about the risks of secondhand smoke similar to those of EPA and many other organizations. back to top Cigarette Prohibition The claim that the government is attempting to bring back prohibition -- this time for cigarettes -- is a complete fabrication and utter nonsense. EPA's interest is to provide information to protect the nonsmoker from involuntary exposure to a hazardous substance. Having a choice to take a risk for themselves should not permit smokers to impose a risk on others. Go back to top Secondhand Smoke Legislation Congress has recently passed, and President Clinton has signed into law, legislation restricting smoking in nearly all public places where federal assistance is provided for services to children. Children exposed to secondhand smoke almost never have a choice. Protecting children from the health effects of secondhand smoke should be a pdodty for everyone. The Clinton Administration supports pending legislation (H.R. 3434, S.1680, S. 262) that would protect nonsmokers, including children, from secondhand smoke in most public places. These bills would not take away the smoker's freedom to choose to smoke, nor would it bring govemment regulation into the home. The bills would also make good economic sense. EPA estimates that smoking restrictions would result in saving $4 billion to $8 billion per year in housekeeping and maintenance expenses. Perhaps most importantly, the bills would prevent thousands of premature deaths of nonsmokers per year and reduce the incidence of respiratory illness in children. Page: 8 Thumday, November 2, 2000 Secondhand Smoke - Setting the Record http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/strsfs.html#top o! page Straight For Further Information For additional information on secondhand smoke and other indoor air pollutants: Contact EPA's Indoor Air Quality Information Clearinghouse [IAQ INFO] at 1-800-438-4318 or (703) 356-4020 in Washington Metro area PO Box 37133 Washington DC 20013-7133 (703) 356-5386 (fax) iaainfo~__aol.com Go back to tod Last Modified: June 26, 2000 http:llwww.epa.govliaqlpubslstrsfs.html !Er~iror~n~n~i iProt, ect~ A~.ncy Page: 9 CDC A Report of the Surgeon General U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office on Smoking and Health Preventing Tobacco Use Among You ng People Many chronic changes in cardiovascular physiol- ogy have been observed in children exposed to ETS. These changes include lower HDL cholesterol, increased carboxyhemoglobin concentration, and increased red-cell 2.3-diphosphoglycerate, as well as physiologic response suggesting mild, chronic hypoxemia (Moskowitz et al. 1990). ETS is also known to increase platelet aggregation (Glantz and Parmley 1991). The effect of peer smoking--as a source of ETS-- on nonsmoking children has not been studied but may also be a health risk. Adult Health Implications of Smoking Among Young People Respiratory Diseases As was discussed previously, sustained smoking during adulthood is associated with the development of COPD and the progressive loss of lung function (USDHHS 1984, 1990). Evidence suggests that smoking during childhood may increase the risk for developing COPD in adulthood as well as at an earlier age. The adult who smoked during childhood may have experi- enced early inflammatory, changes---childhood smoking is known to reduce lung growth--and thereby not at- tained the level of function achieved during the normal growth and development of the lungs. Any age-related decline in lung function during adulthood would thus start from a lower level--and might begin at a younger age--than declines observed in adults who have never smoked. In fact, the proportionate impeding effect of childhood smoking on lung growth greatly exceeds the loss of lung function associated with smoking during adulthood (Tager et al. 1985, 1988). If one or both parents of an adolescent smoke, the effects of parental smoking on early childhood respira- tory illnesses and on the growth of lung function may increase the risk of COPD. Illnesses in the lower respira- torx; region during childhood are a suspected risk factor tor'COPD (Samet, Tager, Speizer 1983), and passive smoking reduces the rate at which lung function grows (USDHHS 1986a). Cardiovascular Disease In adults, cigarette smoking has been causally associated with coronary heart disease, arteriosclerotic peripheral vascular disease, and stroke (USDHHS 1983, 1989). Smoking contributes to increased risk for coro- nary heart disease probably through at least, five in- ter;elated processes, including the development of atherosclerosis (USDHHS 1990). It is likely that the earlier the age at which one starts to smoke, the earlier the onset of coronary heart disease. The recent evidence from the PDAY Research Group shows more athero- sclerosis in young smokers than in young nonsmokers. The unfavorable effects of smoking on lipid levels in children may contribute to the development of athero- sclerosis in young adulthood. Cancer The multistage concept of carcinogenesis imphes that the risk of smoking-related cancers is strongly de- pendent on the duration and intensity of smoking (Armitage and Doll 1954; Doll 1971; Taioli and Wynder 1991). The relevant epidemiologic data and mathemati- cal analvses are most abundant for lung cancer. Both epidemiologic and experimental evidence suggest that the risk for lung cancer varies more strongly with the duration of cigarette smoking than with the number of cigarettes smoked (Peto 1977; Doll and Peto 1978). Analy- sis of data from a cohort study of British doctors showed that lung cancer incidence increased with the fourth or fifth power of duration of smoking but ~-ith the second power of number of cigarettes smoked daily (Doll and Peto 1978). Although these data can be adequately de- scribed by alternative mathematical models that give lesser weight to duration (Moolgavkar, Dewanji, Luebeck 1989), the dependenc.e ,o..f lung cancer risk on duration of smoking implies that starting smoking at an earlier age increases the potential number of life-years of smoking and therefore increases lung cancer risk. If one assumes, for example, that lung cancer risk rises exponentially as a function of the duration of smoking, then the risk at age 50 for a person who began smoking regularly at age 13 is 350 percent greater than that for a 50-year-old who started smoking at age 23. Similar analyses have not been done for other smoking-related sites of cancer. Nevertheless, for most smoking-related cancers, the risk rises with the' duration of smoking (USDHHS 1982,1989,1990; Interna- tional Agency for Research on Cancer 1985). One could Health Consequences 29 u/,-.-/o¢ Surseon General's Report infer that the risk of smoking-related cancer for sites other than the lungs would increase, at a given adult age, in inverse proportion to the age an adolescent begins smoking. Recent studies indicate that earlier onset of cigarette smoking is also associated with heavier smok- ing (Taioli and Wynder 1991; Escobedo et al. 1993). Heavier smokers are not only more likely to experience tobacco-related health problems, they are the least likely to quit smoking (Hall and Terezhalmy 1984; USDHHS 1989). Early use of cigarettes thus appears to influence intensity as well as duration of use and increases the potential for long-term health consequences. Nicotine Addiction in Adolescence Introduction Nicotine dependency through cigarette smoking is not only the most common form of drug addiction but the one that causes more death and disease than all other addictions combined (USDHHS 1988). Most human research on nicotine addiction has been conducted with adult subjects, but the basic biologic processes that underlie this dependency appear to be similar in ad- olescents and adults. The research hterature on nicotine addiction examines its chemistry and addiction poten- tial, its severity, and its pathophysiology and clinical course. Background and Nomenclature Drug addiction is the term most widely used to label various medical and social disorders related to the compulsive ingestion of psychoactive chemicals. The primary criteria for drug dependence are that the behav- ior is highly controlled or compulsive, the chemical is one whose mood-altering or psychoactive effects are central elements of the drug's activity, and the drug itself has the demonstrated capability of reinforcing behavior (Table 4). The American Psychiatric Association (ALVA) has identified two medical disorders that pertain to nico- tine addiction: nicotine dependence and nicotine withdrawal (A_PA 1987). Nicotine dependence is classified as a psychoactive substance-use disorder characterized by "a cluster of cognitive, behavioral, and physiologic symptoms that indicate that the person has impaired control of psychoactive substance use and continues use of the substance despite adverse consequences" (APA 1987, p. 166). In the case of nicotine, the most common form of use is cigarette smoking, in part because the rapid ab- sorption of nicotine through the processes of smoking "leads to a more intensive habit pattern that is more difficult to give up" than other forms of use (APA 1987, p. 181). Nicotine dependence also occurs through other routes of dehvery, including smokeless tobacco and nicotine gum. Nicotine withdrawal, an organic mental disorder induced by the removal of psychoactive substance, is described as "a characteristic withdrawal syndrome due to the abrupt cessation of or reduction in the use of nicotine-containing substances (e.g., cigarettes, cigars and pipes, chewing tobacco, or nicotine oo-um) that has been at least moderate in duration and amount. The syndrome includes craving for nicotine; irritabili ,ty, frustration, or anger; anxiety; difficulty concentrating; restlessness; de- creased heart rate; and increased appetite or weight gain" (APA 1987, p. 150). Physical dependence refers to the condition in which withdrawal symptoms have been observ'ed. Physical dependence can complicate the process of achieving and Table 4. Criteria for drug dependence Primary criteria Highly controlled or compulsive use Psychoactive effects Drug-reinforced behavior Additional criteria Addictive behavior often involves the following: Stereotypic patterns of use Use despite harmful effects Relapse following abstinence Recurrent drug cravings Dependence-producing drugs often manifest the following: Tolerance Physical dependence Pleasant (euphoric) effects Source: Adapted from USDHHS (1988). 30 Health Consequences Preventing T~bacco Use Among Young People maintaining drug abstinence, and the symptoms can be so unpleasant as to precipitate relapse (Jaffe 1985; USDHHS 1988). In surveys by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), withdrawal and inability to main- ~n abstinence are commonly attributed to cigarette smok- ing and heroin use (USDHHS 1988). The majority of people monitored who regularly use other addictive drugs (including cocaine and marijuana) report that they have not experienced withdrawal, even though many of these people feel dependent and have been unable to maintain abstinence (USDHHS 1988). Severity of Nicotine Addiction Tobacco-delivered nicotine can be highly addic- tive. Each year, nearly 20 million people try to quit smoking in the United States (USDHHS 1990), but only about 3 percent have long-term success (Pierce et al. 1989; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], Office on Smoking and Health, unpublished data). Even among addicted persons who have lost a lung because of cancer or have undergone major cardiovascular sur- gery, only about 50 percent maintain abstinence for more than a few weeks (West and Evans 1986; USDHHS 1988). In a 1991 Gallup Poll, 70 percent of current smokers reported that they considered themselves to be "addicted" to cigarettes (Gallup Organization 1991). These findings are consistent with data from NIDA's 1985 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA), which showed that 84 percent of 12- through 17-year-olds who smoked one pack or more of cigarettes per day felt that they "needed" or were "dependent" on cigarettes (Henningfield, Clayton, Pollin 1990). The NHSDA data show that young smokers develop toler- ance and dependence, increase the amount they smoke, and are unable to abstain from nicotine. These findings suggest that the addictive processes in adolescents are fun- damentally the same as those studied in adults (USDI-IFIS 1988; Henningfield, Clayton, Poi/in 1990). Several studies have found nicotine to be as addic- tive as heroin, cocaine, or alcohol (Henningfield, Clayton, Pollin 1990; Henningfield, Cohen, Slade 1991; Kozlowski et al. 1993). Moreover, because the typical pattern of tobacco use entails daily and repeated doses of nicotine, addiction is more common among all users than is true of other drug use, which tends to occur on a far less frequent basis (USDHHS 1988). For example, only about 10 to 15 percent of current alcohol drinkers are consid- ered problem drinkers, but approximately 85 to 90 per- cent of cigarette smokers smoke at least five cigarettes every, day (Henningfield, Cohen, Slade 1991; Evans et' al. 1992; Henningfield 1992b; Kozlowski et al. 1993). Only 2 to 3 percent of smokers (or about 7 to 10 percent of those who try quitting) stop smoking for one year (CDC 1993a), and most daily smokers report that they feel dependent on smoking ~nd have experienced with- drawal symptoms (USDHHS 1988; Henningfield, Clayton, Pollin 1990). Chemistry and Addiction Potential Many behaviors that become regular, habitual, and hard to give up involve the ingestion of a substance. What sets drug addictions apart from less harmful habits is that the ingested substance releases a psychoactive drug with the demonstrated potential to addict. Several thousand chemicals are present in cigarette smoke. Some may conceivably modulate nicotine's addictive effects, but the fact that different forms of nicotine dehvery can be substituted for one another (e.g., nicotine gum or transdermal patch in place of cigarettes) suggests that nicotine is critical in the addiction process (Henningfietd 1984; Benowitz 1988; USDHHS 1988; Russell 1990). Nicotine is a naturally occurring alkaloid present in varying concentrations in different strains of tobacco. Most cigarettes sold in the United States contain about 8 to 9 milligrams of nicotine, of which the smoker ,typically in- gests 1 to 2 milligrams per cigarette (Beno~dtz et al. 1983; USDHHS 1988). Nicotine is both a lipid- and water- soluble molecule that can be rapidly absorbed in a mildly alkaline environment through the skin or the Lining of the mouth and nose. Because of the massive area for absorp- tion in the alveoli of the lungs, nicotine inhaled deeply is almost immediately extracted from the smoke into the pulmonary veins; this sudden spike or bolus of nicotine is dehvered to the brain, via arterial circulation, in approxi- mately 10 seconds (USDI-[HS 1988). In contrast, although smokeless tobacco has much higher levels of nicotine than cigarettes, the delivery, of the drug is much more gradual; the effect peaks within approximately 20 minutes of use (Benowitz et al. 1988). The peak for nicotine replacement medications is even slower--30 minutes or longer for nicotine gum (Benowitz et al. 1988), several hours for the four commercially available transdermal patch systems (Palmer, Buckler, Faulds 1992). In fact, because of the eff~ciency of the pulmonary route in extracting nicotine from inhaled tobacco smoke, nicotine may be 10 times more concentrated in arterial blood than in simultaneously sampled venous blood; these levels are much higher than those produced by nicotine replacement medications (Henningfield, London, Benowitz 1990). As vehicles for nicotine delivery, tobacco products are convenient to use, and they pro~Ade the experienced user with a means of regulating dose level. Such control does not, however, protect the user against drug depen- dency, since tobacco products appear to deliver the opti- mal addiction potential (or abuse liability) of nicotine. Chemicals can be tested for their addiction potential to Health Consequences 31 CDC A Report of the Surgeon General U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Sen'ice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office on Smoking and Health Surgeon General's Report 4. Adolescents with lower levels of school achieve- ment, with fewer skills to resist pervasive influences to use tobacco, with friends who use tobacco, and with lower self-images are more likely than their peers to use tobacco. 5. Cigarette advertising appears to increase young people's risk of smoking by affecting their perceptions of the pervasiveness, image, and func- tion of smoking. Communi ,tywide efforts that include tobacco tax in- creases, enforcement of minors' access laws, youth- oriented mass media campaigns, and school-based tobacco-use prevention programs are successful in reducing adolescent use of tobacco. Summary Introduction The health effects of cigarette smoking have been the subject of intensive investigation since the 1950s. Ciga- rette smoking is still considered the chief preventable cause of premature disease and death in the United States. As was documented extensively in previous Sur- geon General's reports, cigarette smoking has been caus- ally linked to lung cancer and other fatal malignancies, atherosclerosis and coronary, heart disease, chronic ob- structive pulmonary disease, and other conditions that constitute a wide array of serious health consequences (USDHHS 1989). More recent studies have concluded that passive (or involuntary) smoking can cause disease, including lung cancer, in healthy nonsmokers. In 1986, an advisory committee appointed by the Surgeon Gen- eral released a special report on the health consequences of smokeless tobacco, concluding that smokeless tobacco use can cause cancer and can lead to nicotine addiction (USDHHS 1986). In the 1988 report, nicotine was desig- nated a highly addictive substance, comparable in its physiological and psychological properties to other ad- dictive substances of abuse (USDHHS 1988). Considerable evidence indicates that the health problems associated with smoking are a function of the duration (years) and the intensity (amount) of use. The younger one begins to smoke, the more likely one is to b~ a current smoker as an adul~ Earlier onset of cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use provides more life- years to use tobacco and thereby increases the potential duration of use and the risk of a range of more serious health consequences. Earlier onset is also associate~! with heavier us~ those who begin to use tobacco as younger adolescents are among the heaviest users in adolescence and adulthood. Heavier users are more- likely to experience tobacco-related health problems and are the least likely to quit smoking cigarettes or using smokeless tobacco. Preventing tobacco use among young people is therefore likely to affect both duration and intensity, of total use of tobacco, potentially reducing long-term health consequences significantly. Health Consequences of Tobacco Use Among Young People Active smoking by young people is associated with significant health problems during childhood and adolescence and with increased risk factors for health problems in adulthood. Cigarette smokm§ during adolescence appears to reduce the rate of lung growth and the level of maximum lung function that can be achievecl Young smokers are likely to be less physically fit than young nonsmokers; fitness levels are inversely related to the duration and the intensity of smoking. Adolescent smokers report that they are significantly more likely than their nonsmoking peers to experience shortness of breath, coughing spel]~s, phlegm production, wheezing, and overall dimin- ished physical health._' Cigarette smoking during child- hood and adolescence poses a clear risk for respiratory symptoms and problems during adolescence; these health problems are risk factors for other chronic con- ditions in adulthood, including chronic obstructive pulmonary, disease. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among adults in the United States. Atheroscle- rosis, however, may begin in childhood and become clinically significant by young adulthood. Cigarette smoking has been shown to be a primary risk factor for coronary, heart disease, arteriosclerotic peripheral vascular disease, and stroke. Smoking by children and adolescents is associated with an increased risk of early atherosclerotic lesions and increased risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. These risk factors include increased levels of Iow-density llpoprotein cholesterol, increased very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, increased triglycerides, and reduced levels of 6 Introduction Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People lipoprotein cholesterol. If sustained into adulthood, these patterns significantly increase the risk for early development of cardiovascular disease. Smokeless tobacco use is associated with health consequences that range from halitosis to severe health problems such as various forms of oral cancer. Use of smokeless tobacco by young people is associated with early indicators of adult health consequences, including periodontal degeneration, soft tissue lesions, and general systemic alterations. Previous reports have documented that smokeless tobacco use is as addictive for young people as it is for adults. Another concern is that smoke less tobacco users are more likely than nonusers to be- come cigarette smokers. Among addictive behaviors such as the use of alco- hol and other drugs, cigarette smoking is most likely to become established during adolescence. Young people who begin to smoke at an earlier age are more likely than later starters to develop long-term nicotine addiction. Most young people who smoke reg-ularly are already addicted to nicotine, and they experience this addiction in a manner and severi ,ty similar to what adult smokers experience. Most adolescent smokers report that they, would like to quit smoking and that they have mad~ numerous, usually unsuccessful attempts to qui~ Many eOlescents say that thev intend to quit in the future and t prove unable to do s~. Those who try to quit smoking report ~Athdrawal s,vmptoms similar to those reported by adults. Adolescents are difficult to recruit for formal cessation programs, and when enrolled, are difficult to retain in the programs. Success rates in adolescent cessa- tion programs tend to be quite low, both in absolute terms and relative to control conditions. Tobacco use is associated with a range of problem behaviors during adolescence. Smokeless tobacco or cigarettes are generally the .first drug used by young people in a sequence that can include tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, and hard drugs. This pattern does not imply that tobacco use causes other drug use, but rather that other drug use rarely occurs before the use of tobacco. Still, there are a number of biological, behavioral, and social mechanisms by which the use of one drug may facilitate the use of other drugs, and adolescent tobacco users are substantially more likely to use alcohol and illegal drugs than are nonusers. Cigarette smokers are also more likely to get into fights, can3~ weapons, attempt suicide, and engage in high-risk sexual behaviors. These problem behaviors can be considered a syndrome, since involvement in one behavior increases the risk for in- volvement in others. Delaying or preventing the use of may have implications for delaying or prevent- these other behaviors as well. The Epidemiology of Tobacco Use Among Young People Overall, about one-third of high-school-aged ado-- lescents in the United States smoke or use smokeless tobacco. Smoking prevalence among U.S. adolescents declined sharply in the 1970s, but this decline slowed significantly in the 1980s, particularly among white males. Although female adolescents during the 1980s were more likely than male adolescents to smoke, female and male adolescents are now equally likelv to smoke. Male ado- lescents are substantially more likely than females to use smokeless tobacco products; about 20 percent of high school males report current use, whereas only about 1 percent of females do. White adolescents are more likely to smoke and to use smokeless tobacco than are black and Hispanic adolescents. Sociodemogra phic, environmental, behavioral, and personal factors can encourage the onset of tobacco use among adolescents. Young people from families with lower socioeconomic status, including those adolescents living in single-parent homes, are at increased risk of initiating smoking. Among en~4ronmental factors, peer influence seems to be particularly potent in the early stages of tobacco use; the first tries of dgarettes and smokeless tobacco occur most often with peers, and the peer group may subsequently provide expectations, re- inforcement, and cues for experimentation. Parental tobacco use does not appear to be as compelling a risk factor as peer use; on the other hand, parents may exert a positive influence by disapproving of smoking, being involved in children's free time, discussing health mat- ters with children, and encouraging children's academic achievement and school involvement. How adolescents perceive their social environment may be a stronger intluence on behavior than the actual environment. For example, adolescents consistently over- estimate the number of young people and adults who smoke. Those with the highest overestimates are more likely to become smokers than are those with more accu- rate perceptions. Similarly, those who perceive that ciga- rettes are easily accessible and generally available are more liken to begin smoking than are those who per- ceive more difficulty in obtaining cigarettes. Behavioral factors figure heavily during adoles- cence, a period of multiple transitions to physical matu- ration, to a coherent sense of self, and to emotional independence. Adolescents are thus particularly vulner- able to a range of hazardous behaviors and activities, including tobacco use, that may seem to assist in these transitions. Young people who report that smoking serves positive functions or is potentially useful are at increased risk for smoking. These functions are associated with Introduction 7 Public Health Briefi Adolescent Smokers' Provision of Tobacco to Other Adolescents Objectives. This study exam- ined adolescent smokers' provision of tobacco to other adolescents. Methods. Data from a survey of 8th-, 9th-, and 10th-grade students in Minnesota were analyzed by using mixed-model logistic regression. Results. More than two thirds (68.8%) of adolescent smokers had provided tobacco to another adoles- cent in the previous 30 days. Moth- er's smoking, number of friends who smoke, owning tobacco merchan- dise, number of cigarettes smoked in the past week, source of last cigarette (commercial), and recent attempt to buy cigarettes were associated with providing. Conclusions. The social avail- ability of tobacco to youth needs further examination. (Am J Public Health. t 997 ;87:649-651 ) Mark Wolfson, PhD, Jean L. Forster, PhD, MPH, Ami J. Claxton, MS, and David M. Murray, PhD Introduction Recent research has documented that tobacco products are readily available to youth. A majority of teenagers responding to surveys report that it would be easy to obtain cigarettes, t .2 Teenagers who smoke report commemial outlets to be an impor- tant source of cigarettes.2-4 And a number of studies have found that a majority of retail outlets sampled will sell cigarettes to minors,s-to In response to growing awareness of the widespread ava/lability of tobacco to youth, efforts to reduce commercial access to tobacco by teens have prohferated.t°,ll Adolescents obtain tobacco from social as well as commercial sources. One recent survey found that 73.7% of 8th, 9th. and 10th graders who reported having ever smoked obtained their most recent cigarette from a friend or family member, as compared with 22.6% who obtained it from a commercial souree,t2 A survey of 9th graders in Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COYLM1T) communities found that 57% of current smokers reported that a friend or sibling was a usual source of cigarettes, and 17% reported that parents or other adults were a usual source.3 Because of the scope of social availability suggested in these and other studies? the behavior of social providers is an important object of study. In this paper, we focus on one category of social providers: adolescents who provide to- bacco to other adolescents. Me&o& Data were collected in 1993 as part of baseline data collection for a random- ized community trial of a policy-focused intervention to prevent adolescent tobacco access and use (Tobacco Policy Options for Prevention).TM Eighth-, ninth-, and tenth-grade students in public school districts surrounding 14 small cities (popu- lation 3235 to 13 132) in Minnesota were surveyed about tobacco access and use. Trained staff administered the survey during school hours, and 91.1% (n = 6014) of enrolled students participated. Characteristics of the overall sample have been reported in Forster et al.12 The analyses presented here are limited to students who reported smoking in ~' previous 30 days (n = 1089). These c rent smokers included more boys (54.6%) than girls (45.4%), and students in older grades predominated (20.9%, 35.8%, and 43.3% of the students were in grades 8, 9, and 10, respectively). The outcome variable was provision of tobacco products to other adolescents in the past 30 days. Correlates of provi- sion were identified via mixed-model regression, which allowed for modeling random effects (in this case, community) as well as fixed effects.~5 Because of the dichotomous outcome, we used an adapta- tion of mixed-model regression that al- lows specification of a binomial error distribution (GLIMMIX macro in SAS).16 We started with a model with several potential correlates and singly eliminated terms until a parsimonious model was found. The potential correlates included demographics, social influences, per- The authors are with the Division of Epidemiol- ogy, School of Public Health, University of .Minnesota, Minneapolis. Requests for reprints should be se Mark Wolfson, PhD, Division of Epidemio, _,, School of Public Health, University of Minne- sot& 1300 S Second St, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN 55454-1015. This paper was accepted June 28, 1996. April 1997, Vol. 8?, No. 4 ~ Q I[ Reprint American Journal of Public Health 649 lmblic Health Briefs TABLE lmFinal Mixed-Model Logistic Regression: Correlates of Minnesota Adolescent Smokers' Provision of Tobacco Products to Other Adolescents Odds 95% Confidence Coefficient (SE) Ratio interval Mother smokes 0.47 (0.18)** 1.60 1.13, 2.26 No. friends who smoke 0.59 (0.18)*** 1.80 1.28, 2.53 (half to all) Owns tobacco memhandise 0.61 (0.17)*** 1.83 1.31,2.57 Smoking level (linear)a 0.05 (0.01)*** . ..... (no. cigarettes/wk) Smoking level (quadratic)a -3 x 10-4 (6 x 10-s)*** Source of last cigarette 0.55 (0.23)* 1'.~ 1.14,' ~'.73 (commercial) Attempted to buy cigarettes 1.19 (0.24)*** 3.29 2.06, 5.26 in past 30 days "Continuous variable (see Figure 1 for illustration of effect). *P < .05; **P < .01; '**P < .001. Odds of Providing Tobacco Products to Other Minors (Past Month) 25 20 15 10 5 o 4 8 12 16 2o 24 28 32 36 40 4z~ 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 Number of Cigarettes Smoked (Past Week) ...... Upper 95% Cl Odds ol providing .... Lower 95% CI Note. Data are based on the results of the mixed-modei logistic regression shown in Table 1. Values were calculated with other variables in the model set at their means. The x-axis is truncated at the 90th percentile of the distribution of cigarettes smoked. CI = confidence interval, FIGURE lmRelationship between number of cigarettes smoked in the past week and odds of providing tobacco products to other minors. ceived consequences, perceived availabil- ity, sources of cigarettes, smoking behav- ior, and ownership of tobacco brand items. Demographic variables included socioeconomic status (based on the high- est educational achievement of the parent or parents in the home), gender, grade, and residence (in or outside of town). Social influences included smoking status of the student's father, mother, older siblings, and best friend;' number of friends who smoke (none or some, half to all), and the student's estimate of the percentage of students in his or her grade who smoke (0% to 40%, more than 40%). Perceived consequences included the stu- dent's perception of the severity of school sanctions for tobacco use (classified as high, medium, and Iow), whether parents would punish the student if caught using tobacco, and the likelihood that parents would catch the student if he or she used tobacco (seven point-scales collapsed into likely [1 or 2], somewhat likely [3 to 5], and not likely [6 or 7]). Perceived availability measures were based on students' estimates of how hard it would be for other students their age to obtain tobacco products from commercial and social sources (collapsed from a seven- point scale into not difficult [1 or 2], somewhat difficult [3 to 5], and difficult [6 or 7]). Variables reflecting the most recent source of cigarettes for each student (social or commercial) and whether the student had attempted to buy cigarettes in the past 30 days were also included. Measures of smoking behavior included age of initiation and smoking level (number of cigarettes smoked in the past week). Since the relationship between age of initiation and quantity of cigarettes smoked and the outcome variable could be nonlinear, we included quadratic terms for these variables in the initial model. Finally, a variable indicating ownership of tobacco brand items (e.g., tee shirt. baseball cap, lighter, jacket) was used. Results More than two thirds (68.8%) of students who reported smok/ng in the past 30 days also reported providing tobacco to another adolescent during that period: 66.3% to a same-age friend or acquain- tance, 37.4% to a younger friend or acquaintance, 16.6% to a brother or sister. and 12.9% to a stranger. Table 1 presents the final mixed- model logistic regression results. The following variables were not correlated with provision: socioeconomic status: gender; grade; residence: father's, older siblings', and best friend's smoking sta- tus; initiation age; student's estimate of the percentage of students who smoked: all of the measures of perceived conse- quences; and perceived difficulty of ac- cess through commercial and social sources. Mother's smoking, number of friends who smoke, ownership of mer- chandise, smoking level, source of last cigarette (commercial), and purchase at- tempt in the past 30 days were all positively associated with provision. The results for a recent purchase attempt were particularly striking; students who re- ported such an attempt were more than 650 American Journal of Public Health {~ ~'~ I ~x April 1997, Vol. 87. No. 4 Public Health Briefs three times as likely as students who did not to also report providing tobacco to other adolescents. The relationship be- tween smoking level and provision was positive and slightly nonmonotonic (Fig- ure 1), as indicated by the statistically significant but small quadratic term. In addition to identifying correlates of providing tobacco to anyone under the age of 18 years, we conducted separate analyses of providing to a brother or sister, a same-age friend or acquaintance, or a younger friend or acquaintance. The results of these analyses closely mirrored those presented earlier, with a few minor differences probably attributable to some- what less power to detect significant predictors because the events being pre- dicted were less common. Discussion Provision of tobacco products to other adolescents was strikingly prevalent among past-30-day adolescent smokers. Much of this behavior seems to be situated within adolescent friendship net- works, which may be selected in part on the basis of such shared behaviors as smoking~? and within which sharing of cigarettes may perform important func- tions in signifying ~oup membership and standing,ia While providing to a brother or sister was less common, it may neverthe- less represent an important route of access to tobacco products at early ages and early stages of experimentation. Adolescents who were heavier smok- ers were most likely to provide to others. Heavy smokers may have the largest supply and easiest access to cigarettes, enabling them to pass some fraction onto others, either by gift or by sale. Several of the same factors that have been found to be associated with adolescent smoking predicted provision of tobacco to other adolescents. These factors included num- ber of friends who smoke, which is probably related to the friendship net- works in which provision is reported to occur. The finding .that mother's smoking was related to provision may reflect differences in attitudes (adolescents in families in which smoking occurs may tend to have more favorable attitudes toward tobacco provision and use) or availability (easier access to cigarettes at home, making it easier to provide to others). Since fathers are somewhat more likely to work outside the home. mother's smoking may have the ~eater impact on availability and (as observed here) provi- sion. Adolescent smokers who owned tobacco-related merchandise were more likely than others to provide to other young people. Finally, adolescent provid- ers were likely to enjoy ready availability of cigarettes through commercial sources. There is a pressing need to address the social availability of tobacco to youth. One important dimension is youth who provide tobacco products to other youth, as illustrated in this paper. The association between availability of cigarettes through commercial sources and provision to other adolescents observed in this study suggests that social and commercial avail- ability may be closely related. Thus, achieving reductions in commercial avail- ability may also result in reductions in the social availability of tobacco. Interventions to reduce levels of social availability are not well developed. School-based programs could include messages encouraging youth who smoke not to provide cigarettes to their friends. Similarly, public education campaigns might emphasize that it is illegal, unethi- cal, and counter-normative for adults to provide tobacco to youth. This study is subject to a number of limitations. It used cross-sectional data based on an ethnically homogeneous sample of youth living in small cities and rural areas in the Midwest. Provision by gift was not distinguished from provision by private sale, and provision of cigarettes was not distinguished from provision of smokeless tobacco. Despite these Limita- tions, this is the first study to focus explicitly on provision of tobacco prod- ucts by youth. Future research should assess the extent and predictors of avail- ability and the most effective mechanisms for reducing both commercial and social availability of tobacco to minors. [] Acknowledgments Preparation of this paper was supported in part by ~ant 1R01 CA548932-01A1 from the National Cancer Institute. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 123rd Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association. October/ November 1995. San Diego, Calif. Thanks to Randy Mayer and Blong Xiong for assistance with data analysis. References 1. Johnston L, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG. Smoking, Drinking, and Illicit Drug Use among American Secondary School Stu- dents, College Students, and Young Adults, 1975-1991. Bethesda, Md: National Insti- tutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1992;1. NIH publication 93-3480. 2. Forster JL, Klepp K-I, Jeffrey RW. Sourc~ of cigarettes to tenth graders in t~ Minnesota cities. Health Educ Res. 1989; 4:45-50. 3. Cummings KM, Sciandra E, Peehacek TF, Orlandi M, Lynn WR. Where teenagers get their cigarettes: a survey of the purchasing habits of 13-16-year-olds in 12 US commu- nities. Tobacco Control. 1992;1:264-267. 4. Centers for Disease Conu'ol. Accessibility of cigarettes to youths aged 12-17 years--- United States, 1989 and 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:125-130. 5. DiFranza JR, Brown LJ. The Tobacco Institute's "It's the Law" campaign: has it halted illegal sales of tobacco to children? Am J Public Health. 1992;82:1271-1273. 6. Forster IL, Hourigmn M, McGovern P. Availability of cigarettes to youth in three communities. Prey Med. 1992;21:320- 328. 7. Hoppock KC, Houston TP. Availability of tobacco products to minors. J Faro Pract. 1990:30:174-176. 8. Nelson IM, Marson PQ, Roby RM. Mini- study on the availability of cigarettes to minors. S D Nurse. 1989;32(2): 17-18. 9. Thomson B. Toffier WL. The illegal sale of cigarettes to minors in Oregon. J Faro Pract. 1990;3l:206-208. 10. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta. Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking an,~ Health; 1994. 11. Lynch BS, Bonnie RJ. Growing Up ?o- bacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Cltildren and Youths. Washington, DC: National Academy Press: 1994. 12. Forster JL, Wolfson M, Murray DM. Wagenaar AC, Claxton AJ. Perceived and measured availability, of tobacco to youth in fourteen Minnesota communities: the TPOP Study. Am J Prey Med. In press. 13. Stanwick RS. Fish DG. Manfreda J. Gelskey D, Skuba A. Where Manitoba children obtain their cigarettes. Can Med Assoc J. 1987:137:405-408. 14. Blame T, Hennrikus D, Forster JL, O'Neil S, Wolfson M, Pham H. Creating public health policy at the local level: implementa- tion of a direct action organizing approach. Health Educ Q. In press. 15. Murray DM. Wolfinger RD. Analysis issues in the evaluation of community trials: progress toward solutions in SAS/ STAT MIXED. J Community Psychol. 1994:(special issue): 140-154. 16. Wolfinger R. O'Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comp,a Simulation. 1993: 48:233-243. 17. Ennert ST, Bauman KE. The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogenei~': the case of adolescent cigarette smoking. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994:67:653-663. 18. Eckert P. Beyond the statistics of ado' cent smoking. AmJPublic Health. 1983;, 439-441. American Journal of Public Health 651 April1997, Vol. 87, No. 4 ~ 9 } 3 TO: DA: RE: Carol Weber Lina Tucker Reinders 8 November 2000 Mound Resolution: "WHEREAS, public display of tobacco use results in role modeling behavior and reinforces the norm that tobacco use is acceptable;" The referenced statement has been verified through research conducted by Jean L. Forster, Ph.D~. Data and conclusions were presented by Dr. Forster at the 1999 American Public Health Association annual meeting in Chicago, Ill in a session titled "Social Exchange of Cigarettes Among Adolescents: A Growing Problem." The data and conclusions were published via this venue and are credible to reference. The following is an excerpt2 of the presentation that directly relates to the issue of concern within the Mound tobacco free public parks resolution. Teens perceive that adults approve of teen smoking behavior they do nothing to stop it. ·hen people ora community think it is okay for teens to smoke in various locations, social exchange of tobacco is more likely to occur. Initial teen smoking is dependant on social exchange of tobacco; ~ocial exchange increases as smoking behavior intensifies. Adult behavior and rules about smoking is a significant predictor of social eXchange, indicating the normative influence of adults on teen behavior. The more lax normative and adult environment, the more social exchange, Successful acquisition, and initiation and intensity of teen tobacco use. Dr. Forster is a Professor at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. Excerpt is paraphrased, based on the presenter's direct speaking notes. Perceived and M, easured Availability of Iobacco to Youths in 14 Minnesota Communities: The TPOP Study Jean L. Forster, PhD Mark Wolfson, PhD David M. Murra.~; PhD Alexander C. Wagenaar, PhD Ami J. Claxton, MS Introduction: Availabilit? of tobacco to young people is believed to be an important factor in the onset of tobacco use. We still do not have a complete picture of how tobacco is obtained by youths or how access can be curtailed. Design: This article describes tobacco availabiti~' to youths in 14 communities that are pan of a randomized trial, known as TPOP (Tobacco PoliQ' Options for Prevention). The data reported here were obtained from student surveys and tobacco- purchase attempts by underage confederates. Results: Students who have smoked at least once were likely to cite social sources for cigarenes. However, more than half of weekly smokers and almost one thixd of tenth-grade ever smok- ers reported purchasing cigarettes in the last 30 days. Tobacco- purchase at'tempts by confederate buyers at all outlets resulted in an overall success rate of 40.8%, lower than previously reported for urban communities. Fifty-five percent of the over-the-counter outlets had no self-service displays of tobacco at baseline. Store factors that predicted purchase success include tobacco location; purchase success was lower when all tobacco was locked or behind a service counter. The percentage of smokers who reported purchasing theix own tobacco soon after starting to smoke was highest in towns where purchase success by teenage · study confederates ss'as highest. Conclusions: These results suggest that sources of ciga.rertes shdx from social to commercial with age and that sources of ciga- renes for rural youths may be different than for urban youths. Medical Subject Headings (MESH): tobacco, adolescent behav- ior, sales. [Am J Prey Med 1997;13:167-74] Availability of tobacco to young people is believed to be an important factor in the onset of tobacco use and has stimulated much attention in recent years. Evidence has accumulated sug- gesting that tobacco products are widely available to adolescents despite their illegal status for those under age 18 in every state.I Surveys uniformly find that teenagers report that they can obtain cigarettes easily? Research concerning tobacco availability has focused on com- mercial sources of tobacco to youths. An estimated 255 million packs of cigarettes were sold to minors in 19917 Between 20% and 70% of teenagers who smoke report purchasing their own tobacco, although the percentage varies by age, social class, amount smoked, and factors related to availability?'~'' In addi- From the Division of £pidemiolog?; School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Address reprint requests to Dr. Forster, University of Minnesota, Division of Epidemiolog).; 1300 South Second Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN $5454-1015 (e-mail: Forster~epivax.epi.umn.edu). 997 American ]ournal of Pre~entwe Mediaine. 0749-3797197. tion, many studies have demonstrated that tobacco can be pur- chased by adolescents from a variety of retail outlets, with success rates averaging about 67%? Previous studies have identified factors associated with the ab3- ity of youths to purchase tobacco. Purchase success has been shown to vary by characteristics of the buyer (gender, age, and perceived age), characteristics of the seller (gender and age), type of business (grocery store, pharmacy, convenience stor~, etc.), type of sale (over-the-counter, vending machine), characteristics of the interaction (whether or not age identification was requested), and presence of signs regarding tobacco sales to minors,t~-~s Despite all that has'been learned in nearly a decade since atten- tion first focused on this problem, we still do not have a com- plet~ picture of how tobacco is obtained by youths and how access can be curtailed. For example, the importance of shoplift- ing as a source of cigarettes to minors is largely unstudied, but the two published reports indicate that a significant proportion of tobacco users steal tobacco from businesses. About 5% of 1,700 Georgia adolescents surveyed about shopld'ting in general reported stealing tobacco in the previous year,~: and 20% to Am] Pret, Med 1997;13(3) 167 'prlate, and answer truthfully if asked their ag,e., If asked for ag i&l~cation, they were to say that they didnt have it with them. If ~irted, the tobacco purchase was completed. :l~e purchasers were accompanied to the cities by an adult driver who was a study employee. The two attempts at each out- let were carried out on successive days. After each at, erupt the , purchaser recorded details of the attempt, including outcome, age and gender of clerk, and number of customers in line behind the purchaser. Immediately following the second anempt, the adult driver entered the store and recorded information about signs, placement of tobacco, and other in-store characteristics. In all, 585 purchases were attempted at 48 vending machines and 259 over-the-counter locations. In 22 locations the second pur- chase at'tempt could not be completed because the business was not open when the anempt was made· Analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize both the student populations and the tobacco outlets in the towns. ~e present student descriptions by grade and/or smoking status and outlet descriptions by D'pe of outlet (over-the-counter or vending machine}. We then examined the relationship between tobacco-purchase success and outlet variables, student reports of tobacco availabil- i~', and community characteristics. Each purchase artempt was characterized first by details of the outlet and the purchase interaction as recorded by the buyer and driver. These variables included age tyounger than 21.21-30, 31 an~ older) and gender of clerk; number of customers in line bekind the purchaser tnone, 1 or more); whether the seller was in view of another employee at the time the at-tempt was made lo}; location of tobacco {all locke&'behind the counter, or available for se!f-serMce); rype of business (gas station or convenience store, bar. restaurant or private club, groceo', drug or discount store, hotel or motel, otherl; presence of tobacco indastry-sponsored youth tobacco access signs {yes.:no); and presence of other no&mdustr~'-sponsored youth tobacco access si~qs (yes'no). Each purchase attempt was also further charaaerized by sev- eral communiv,'-level variables. Each purchase attempt was assigned a value for these variables based on the communiD' in which the purchase attempt was made. These variables included community population and number of retail tobacco outlets in the community'. For example, all purchase at-tempts made in a community of population size 3,235 were assigned a population value of 3,235. Student variables on perceived availability, of tobacco to minors in their community were summarized and assigned to each purchase attempt. These variables were constructed by aver- aging the study survey responses of weekly (or more) smokers within each community, then assigning that community average to purchase artempts made in that community. Only responses from weekly smokers were used to quantify more accurately per- ceived availability of tobacco by minors. Nonsmokers and those who smoked less often than weekly would be less likely to have tried to purchase tobacco and therefore would be less likely to be able to quantify the extent of tobacco availability in their com- munity. The perceived availability variables used to characterize ]ipurchase attempt included source of most recent cigarette d ever source of cigarettes (commercial: bought or stolen from usiness or vending machine; noncommercial: family/friends}; number of buy attempts and purchase refusals in the past 30 days; ~rceived difficulty of obtaining tobacco products, from a salesperson/vending machine (on a 7-point scale where 1 = not at all all,cult, ? -- very d~cult); personal purchase o[ tobacco within a m~nth Of ~rSt using tobaccO (yes/no); and ever being re~used when trying to purchase tobacco (~es/no). For example, [[ 45% o[ weekly smokers within a given communilny answered that they obtained their first cigarette ~rom a commercial source, all purchase a~empts made within that community were assigned a value of 45% for this particular variable. We then examined the relationship between these characteris- tics and purchase success (ye~no) using mixed-model regression techniques to account accurately for the three sources of random variation in the data: the communities, the buyers, and residual error. All other covariates were treated as fixed effects. Covari- ares included in the mixed-model regression were grouped into three sets: outlet-level variables, community variables, and stu- dent data on perceived availability {as described above}. Starting with a base model of purchase success predicted by the outlet- level variables, we used backwards stepwise regression (singly removing terms based on the magnitude and significance of the term) to find a parsimonious model. To this model, the commu- nity variables of population and number of outlets in a commu- nity were added. Similarly, these terms were singly removed until a parsimonious model resulted. Last, terms from the community data from students on perceived availabiliD' were simultaneously added to the model and were also singly removed. The results of this three-step process gave rise to the final model. Because the su~'eyed tobacco outlets included both vending machines and over-the-counter sales, we ran parallel analyses for these two types of purchase at'tempts using variables specific to the type of outlet. Operational locking devices were found at only nine vending machine purchase artem?:s. Therefore, pres- ence of a locking device was not included in the modeling proce- dure for vending machines. ILESLrLTS Student sample chara~ter~ri~. The final student sample of 6,014 for the student survey was almost evenly split between boys and girls, among grades 8, 9, and 10, and almost entirely Caucasian, as shown in Table 1. About 70% of the students lived in the town where the school is located, with the remaining students residing in the surrounding rural area or in a nearby town. Just'over 50% of the students report ever smoking a ciga- rette, with 20% indicating smoking in the past 30 days, almost 17% reporting weekly smoking, and 11% reporting daily smok- ing. Smoking prevalence increased from grades $ to 10, with the biggest jump between grades 8 and 9 (Table 1). Almost 28% of students ~aid that they had tried smokeless tobacco at least once, representing over 50% of the boys in this sample. The combined prevalence of any use of tobacco was 55%, indicating consider- able overlap in cigarette and smokeless tobacco use among boys. $ouroe$ ofdgarertes. Klmost all students who reported smok- ing at least once indicated that they. had obtained their first ciga- rette from family members or friends (Table 2}. However, smokers were likely to buy cigarenes very soon after starting. Over 28% of all smokers, including 43% of weekly smokers, ~aid they bought cigarettes within a month of starting to use tobacco. All smokers, especially younger smokers, were vet')' likely to say that even their most recent cigarette came from social sources. Still, over 30% of all tenth graders who smoke Am ] Pre~' 51ed 1997;13(3) 169 . 2. Sources of cigarettes among ever smokers by ~'ade, and weekly smokers Ever smokers (%) Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Total (n=525) (n=66.2) (n= 740) (n= 1,927) Source of first cigarette Weekly Smokers (%) (n-- Family/friends 92.4 Vending machine 1.2 Over-the-counter purchase 1.9 Stolen from business 2.9 Other 1.6 How long after starting to use tobacco, purchased own Never bought 70.0 Within month 17.7 Within year 9.3 >Year 3.0 Source of most recent cigarette Family/friend 79.3 Vending machine 4.3 Over-the-counter purchase 6.3 Stolen from business 3.5 Other 6.6 Artempts to purchase, last 30 days None 89.3 1-5 rimes 7.3 6-10 times 2.6 >10 times 0.8 Ever obtained cigarettes from Family/friends 85.9 Vending machine 11.4 Over-the-counter purchase 17.0 Stolen from business 14.7 Type of business ever a source Restaurant 6.7 Gas station/convenience store 17.3 Grocer5' store 9.1 Pharmacy 1.5 Bar or liquor store 5.7 Hotel/motel 5.3 Discount store 2.5 Recreational center 5.7 Other 8.6 Result of last purchase artempt from locked vending machine Never tried from locked machine 93.4 Employee permitted purchase 5.2 Employee wouldn't unlock 1.4 How hard or easy is it to get tobacco from' Friend/family 1.8 Vending machine 3.2 Over-the-counter 4.7 Steal from business 3.8 'Responses are on 1-7 scale, where 1 = not at all difficult 91.6 90.4 91.3 90.1 1.2 1.8 1.4 1.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 2.7 3.7 3.4 3.4 4.3 0.8 1.5 1.3 1.0 52.7 43.3 53.7 28.0 29.4 35.3 28.5 43.0 11.6 15.0 12.3 19.9 6.4 6.5 5.5 9.0 77.3 66.6 73.7 60.0 1.1 1.0 1.9 3.0 16.9 28.2 18.4 33.6 2.6 1.2 2.3 2.5 2.1 3.0 3.7 1.0 78.3 68.0 73.! 49.1 14.7 17.3 13.3 24.9 4.1 6.9 4.- 9.4 2.9 7.8 8.9 16.6 85.8 83.5 85.0 80.1 18.0 20.0 I7.0 28.5 33.8 49.3 35.2 58.4 17.8 18.2 17.~ 26.2 12.1 13.0 10.5 18.5 35.5 42.7 32.~ 52.7 13.1 21.5 15.3 27.3 2.1 3.2 2.z 4.1 10.0 10.7 9.1 16.5 6.3 8.6 7.0 12.8 5.1 6.5 4.9 9.3 9.1 13.0 9.7 17.6 7.3 9.3 8.4 13.3 93.2 92.9 93.3 88.9 6.1 5.9 5.7 9.6 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.9 3.4 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.8 and 7 = very di~cult. b~'~ 19 AmJPrevMed2997;13(3) I71 ECONOMICS ELSEVIER Journal of Health Economics 16 (1997) 359-373 ~ Price, tobacco control policies and smoking among young adults Frank J. Chaloupka a,b,*, Henry Wechsler c ~ Department. ofEc'cmomics (m lc 144), Unit:ersi~' of Illinois at Chicago. 60I South Morgan Street. Chicago. IL 60607-21. USA ~ Nationa! Bureau of Economic Research, 50 East 42~c~ Street. 17*~: Floor. New York. 3,'):' I0017-5405, USA c College Alcohol S',Mies P 'o,,,r un Department of Heahh and Soc&d Behavior, Harvard School of Ptd>hc Hecdth. Harl,ard U;m ersio'. 677 Huntingdon .4['enla'. Bos't~m. MA 02115, USA Received 31 JanuarS. 1995; accepted 31 Ma'? 1996 1. Introduction In the thirty xears since the release of the first US Surgeon General's report on smokin< and 'h~alth. considerable progress has been made in reducing the use of tobacc~ Much is known about the health consequences of cigarette smoking and other tobacco use, and numerous anti-smoking policies have been developed. However. in the face of the anti-smoMng campaign, cigarette smoking remains stubbornly high. particularly among youths and young adults. Over four hundred thousand individuals die prematurely in the US each 5'ear as the result of cigarette smoking (National Cancer Institute, 1994). Moreover. after declining rapidly throughout the 1970s, the slowdown in smoking participation among adolescents has all but stopped in recent years (US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994). This paper examines the effectiveness of two major tobacco control policies in discouraging cigarette smoking anaong young adults. In particular, this paper studies the effects of cigarette prices (,~hich can be raised by increasing cigarette excise taxes) and restrictions on smoking in public places and private worksites on smoking participation and cigarette consumption among students in US colleges and universities. This is an interesting age group to study since it contains individuals whose smoking practices are likely to be in the process of becoming · Corresponding author. Fax: (630) 801-8870. 0167-6296/97/$17.00 © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII S01 67-6296(96)00530-9 9~Tgs M i ~h oe I ~'~ Mo Mue I er 612 4724396 P. 01 To: Fro rn ' Date: Kandi$ Hanson City I~lanager Hound City Hall Hike r, lueller Hueller'Lansin9 Proper Lies 22 Nov. 2000 CBD Parking Please consider this memo our formal request to be included in the Central Business District (CBD) Parking program retroactive to Nov. 15, 2000. ! understand this item will become an agenda item for the Tuesday, Nov. 28t" council meeting. you have any questions, please contact me at 472-1104. Thank you. 10/17/00 CITY OF MOUND ETHICS GUIDELINES FOR CITY COUNCIL AND ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS BACKGROUND: The Mound City Council makes the following findings: 1. The confidence that the community has in its public institutions is directly related to the standards followed by the elected and appointed officials. 2. Not only is it important that elected and appointed officials act ethically in their public lives; but it is equally important that they establish and follow clear principles and guidelines to guide them in their actions. 3. The existence and adherence to such guidelines can result in a high level of public trust and acceptance in the actions of elected and appointed officials. 4. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council has adopted the following Ethics Guidelines, to be observed and followed by the City Council and the members of the advisory boards and commissions of the City, (collectively, "Officials"). ETHICS GUIDELINES 1. No Czv. nc:.! member Official shall misuse the office to secure special privileges or exemptions for such person or any other person. 2. No Cz"~.::.! member Official shall directly of indirectly receive or agree to receive or solicit, any compensation, gift, reward or gratuity in payment for the performance of his or her official duties except as may be provided by law. 3. No Co'ant!! member Official shall enter into any contract with the City that is prohibited by law. Any public official who has a proprietary interest in an entity doing business with the City shall make known that interest in writing to the City Council and the City Clerk. 4. Any Coy. nell member Official, who in the discharge of said ~ Official's duties would be required to take an action or make a decision which would substantially affect such official's financial interest or those of a business with which such official is associated (except as the City's representative), unless the effect on such official is no greater than on any other citizens or other members of such official's business classification, profession, or occupation, shall take the following actions: a. A written statement shall be prepared which will include the name, address, office held, action presenting the potential conflict of interest, the nature of the financial interest, the person notified of the potential conflict of interest, the member's signature and the date; b. Said member shall deliver copies of the statement to the City Clerk; c. If a potential conflict presents itself and there is insufficient time to comply with the provisions of clauses "a" and "b" of this section, the member shall verbally inform the City Clerk of the potential conflict. The ~ Official shall then file a written statement with the City Clerk within one week after the potential conflict presents itself which statement shall state the reason for the delay. 5. A Cc"~n:'2 memb,r An Official must not act as an agent or attorney for another before the City Council or a board or commission in a matter where a conflict of interest exists or may exist. 6. A Ccu, n:i! member An Official may accept compensation or expense reimbursement for the performance of the ~ Official's public duties as Cc"~n,~i! member only from the sources listed below. a. Compensation and expenses paid by the City. b. Compensation and expenses from other employment, if the person happens to conduct public business while being paid for the other employment and if the other employment does not interfere with, influence, or compromise the person's public position, and c. Compensation and expenses paid by another governmental agency or municipal association to a Cc'~:nzi! m:mber an Official who serves as a City representative for that agency, but only if the City does not also pay the person for the same activity. 7. A Cc"~:'~! member An Official must not use public money, time, personnel, facilities, or equipment for private gain or political campaign activities except when: a. the use is required or authorized by law, or b. the use is no greater than that allowed for the general public. This paragraph does not prohibit correspondence at any time to individual residents in response to the resident's specific inquiries, or general surveys of residents that are conducted before the time of filing for candidacy for elective office. 8. It is important to public confidence in the operation of government that decisions of the City Council and the advisory boards and commissions of the city (unless subject to certain specific exceptions) be made in public, following discussion among members also taking place in public. For that reason, the following guidelines will be followed by Cz"~mz!! members Officials: JBD-185381v2 2 MU220-1 a. At any gathering that is attended by a majority of the Council, or of an advisory board or commisssion ( unless such gathering has been duly noticed as a meeting of the Council ~-t4~-m4mb~4 or such advisory board or commission), such Officials will refrain from participating, as a group, in any discussion, either between themselves, or others in attendance at the gathering, involving matters that are pending, or are likely to come before the Council or such advisory board or commission. -- b. At any special meeting of the Council~ or of an advisol'~ board or commission, the Officials will refrain from engaging in discussion or taking action on any matter which was not contained on, or reasonably related to, the items in the meeting notice. c. The Council and each advisory board and commission will, from time to time, and at the recommendation of the City Manager, conduct study sessions to familiarize new membe~ Officials and update other ~ Officials with the requirements of the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. 9. While openness is an important cornerstone of good government, it is occasionally necessary to limit disclosure of certain types of data that may come into the hands of Council members Officials. For that reason, Council members Officials will become familiar with the requirements of the Minnesota Data Practices Act, and will seek advice prior to disclosing data in their possession that might be considered as not public. Further, a Council member an Official must not disclose information received, discussed, or decided in conference with the City Attorney that is protected by the attorney/client privilege, unless a majority of the City Council has authorized that disclosure. DISCLOSURES: Within 30 days after taking the oath of office, each Council member Official must file a report with the City Clerk, on a form prepared by the clerk, which contains the information specified below for the preceding year. Subsequently, each person must file a supplemental report on the first day of February of each year in office and within 30 days after any change in information provided under paragraph 5 this section. The information must be for the individual, the individual's spouse, all minor children (collectively referred to below as "person"). a. A business entity in which the person is an officer, director, member, or employee, and the position held. b. A business entity in which the person has an ownership interest, either legal or equitable, greater than 50%. Sources of income, compensation, fees, or commissions that are received from employment, for services rendered, or from pensions, except the employment of minor children. d. Non-profit organizations in which the person serves on the governing body, and the position held, except if serving in that capacity as the City's representative. JBD-185381v2 3 MU220-1 e. Real property within the City owned by the person or in which the person has a beneficial interest and that has an assessed valuation in excess of $20,000. The person's homestead need not be included. The term "business entity" includes any business, proprietorship, firm, partnership, person in representative or fiduciary capacity, association, venture, trust or corporation. T._TI~ A D Th, T/"'_. JBD-185381v2 MU220-1 4 07 2088 14:23:35 ~ia Fax Hou -> Kandis Hanson AMM FAX EWS November 6-1 O, 2000 Page 981 0£ 881 Association of Hctropolitan i'iunicip litkl Storm Water Permit Discussions Begin On Friday Nov 3. 2000 AMM representatives met with staff of the Pollution Control Agency (PCA), the Metropolitan Council and League of Minnesota Cities to discuss the process for the Phase II storm water permits The padicipants reviewed the federal guidelines and identified severat issues that must resolved as part of the process Among the issues are the identification of all of the stakeholders and their rote in the l~cess. For example the MN Board of ter and Soil Resources (BWSR) is responsible by state taw for various aspects of water planning, The water management organizations and the watershed districts also are involved in storm water Another issue is the type of permit. While most participants would prefer that the PCA issue a general permil ralher than individual permits, the possibility of linking the permit to required state comprehensi ye storm water plans was discussed. All metropolitan area cites must prepare a storm water plan and it was suggested that much of the required content of the Phase II permit is already contained in the water plans The group agreed to further examine the possible linkage and will meet with the BWSR representati yes to review the plannin9 process A:¥L¥1.X'ew.~ Fax is faxed to all ,4.*£vi city ager$ attd admiai~trator$, legislative coatact$ td Board metnbers. Please share this fax with rr may, ors, cot~cihnember$ atld ~taff to keep abreast ofimporta~tl metro c[I,V 145 ~'a[versit, v Aveat, e SI. Patti, ~¥1.N' 55103-2044 Phoae: {6519 215-4000 Fax: {651) 281-1299 E-,nail: PCA staff noted that recent federal legislation modified the type and amount of environmental funds that will be available to the state. The sources could be a factor in providin9 pro9rams and assistance to imple- ment the permits. The group agreed to meet again later this month. The agenda will include a discussion with BWSR. a PCA briefing regarding resources and a discussion if legislation ,,viii need to be drafted or amended to authorize the issuance of rules related to the storm water permits. Metropolitan Council Committee Approves Final Inclusionary Housing Grants The Livable Communities Commit- tee on Monday Nov 6. 2000 approved three grants totaling $1 15 million for inclusionary housing developments The funding for the three developments located in Golden Valley, Blaine and Apple Valley is the last of the $4.0 million one time state appropriation made by the 1999 legislature. It is estimated that the inclusionary housing grants will leverage a total of investment of approximately $17'.5 million. Of the total investment, $10.0 million is private investment. The cities also report that the grants will produce 127 affordable units. To TAC Nominations Needed The AMM has an opening or, the Transportation Advisory Commit- tee to the Transportation Advisory Board in Ramsey and Dakota Coun- ties These must be department head level persons in engineering or com- munity planning No applications have been received to date Contact Roger at 651-215-4002 for more information. assisl ~n tne developments the cities waived local fees increased permitted densities and or reduced setback parking and brick construction require- ments It is estimated that the city actions will avoid or reduce approxi- mately $1.6 million in costs. Metropolitan Council to set public hearing date for Housing Performance Guideline Funding On Wednesday Nov 8 2000 the Metropolitan Council will set a public hearing date of Feb 21. 2001 for tne neanng regarding the update of the "P, eg~onal Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Pedor- rT~ance "The update which was discussed ~n a previous AMM Fax ,,,.,ili .oe rev;e,,:ed b.v an AI',,']I',,'I task force The task force recommenda- tions will be presented for review and comment in a future fax The Metropolitan Council will also on Wednesday discuss the Smart Growth Opportunity grant program. It is possible that some 9rants could be announced at the meeting. Xou 14 2888 13:28:49 Via Fax -> Kandis AMM FAX NEWS November 13-1 7, 2000 Hanson Pase 881 Of 001 A ocia£ion oi Hctr0p01itan Hunicipalitie Metropolitan Council Sets Budget, Adopts Draft for Public Hearing The Metropolitan Council at its November 8, 2000 meeting adopted a draft budget proposal for the public hearing scheduled for December 13, 2000. The budget draft differs from the initial proposal released in late August. The differences are as follows: · The latest draft proposes to expend S493.9 million or approximately S1.0 million less than the August budget. - The Metro transit budget is reduced by $984.697 from the August budget · Budget authority is transferred between divisions and departments to support the regional constitu- ency effort, which is part of the Regional Administrator's budget. The regional constituency effort an initiative to have Metropolitan Council members and staff work closely with their citizens and local governments. Resources are also transferred to suppod the Human Resources information systerrL There are no net changes in expendi- tures, revenues or use of fund bal- ances. The transit-operating revenue gap as a result of the changes is $14.5 million or $1.0 million below the August amount. City of Minneapolis Housing Meeting Outlines Potential Legislative Housing Agenda City Council Member Kathy Thurber chaired a discussion that could lead to a legislative housing agenda. In addition to Ms. Thurber and several of her city council colleagues: participants in the discussion included housing advocates, representatives from the Minneapolis Community Development Agency, the Office of the Mayor the City of Minnetonka AMM and the League of Minnesota Cities The group agreed to examine five major areas- inclusionary housing, barriers to producing housing and access to rental units, financial re- sources, business involvement in A34.¥f ,¥ews Fax is faxed to aH A.¥L¥! city ma,y- agers attd admit~istralors, legislative cotttacts and Board members. Please share this fax with your mayors, councilmembers and staff to keep them abreast ofimportaal metro city 145 U,dverMty Ave,rue West St. Paul, M':N' 55105-2044 Phoae: (6519 215-4000 Fax: (651) 281-1299 E-,nail: atntn,.~m,n 145. org housing and tax policy. Small working groups will examine the topics and repod to the full group in early Decem- ber. It is envisioned that any recom- mendation could be incorporated into the Minneapolis legislative program. There was also agreement that there needs to be more federal involvement in resolving the housing crisis and a public education program regarding the need for housing · · AMM and Metropolitan Counties to review the proposed TAB criteria TheAMM and the Metropolitan Counties will meet on Decerr, ber 1 to review the proposed housing performance evaluation crileria (100 points). The criteria as proposed would not only apply to TAB pro- grams but also to other corr, petitive funding prograrns. The working group's comments will be the basis for AMMs statement to the Metro- politan Council. If you have any comments regarding the criteria or need additional information please contact Gene Ranieri (651-215-4001 ). · Metropolitan Council Approves Six Smart Growth Twin Cities Opportunity Sites The Metropolitan Council at its November 8 meeting approved grants for six mixed use redevelopment or development sites. The grants will be used primarily for planning and design assistance. The projects receiving the grants are located in Brooklyn Center Chaska Ramsey St Paul Maplewood and St Anthony Village. AMM Seeks TAB and TAC Nominations in Dakota and Ramsey County Cities MANAGERS/ADMINISTRATORS PLEASE PASS THIS ON AS APPROPRIATE The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) has a vacancy fora city elected official to be nominated by the AMM in both Dakota and Ramsey counties. Aisc, the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) has a vacancy for a city non-elected official to be nominated by the AMM in both Dakota and Ramsey counties. TAB meets at 1:30 p.m. on the third (3rd) VVednesday of each month. TAC city members must be department heads with engineering, planning or public works background Please send brief resume to the AMM attention Gene. For more infor- mation please contact Roger at 651-215-4002. /"~/7 ~ ! AMM FAX EWS November 13-17, 2000 (no. 2) J~and Js Hanson Page 881 Of 881 A ociation of Pletropolitan Hunicipalitie Membership Approves Legislative Policies The AMM membership atthe Nov. 9 policy adoption meeting approved the policies as proposed by the policy committees. In addition to several questions regarding individual policies the membership debated a motion to support an elected Metropolitan Council. After a spirited discussion the motion was not supported, The board will adopt priorities based on recommendations by the commit- tees and members The priorities should be identified bythe beginning of the legislative session. A future AMM FAX NEWS will include the priorities /luetropolitan Land Supply Issues bject of News Media Report KARE 11 has produced two special news reports regarding the impact of the Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) on the cost of housing. The reports have aired on the Sunday and Tuesday 10:00 p.m. news. The reports assert that government actions are driving up the cost of housing. The two news reports have indicated that the Metropolitan Council's estimate of available land for development is to high and that the real supply of availaole land within the MUSA is much less. The report includes interviews with developers and Metropolitan Council officials AM.Y[ .Yews Fax is faxed to ali maaagers attd adtnittistralors, legislative cOtlla£1s and Board metnbers. Please share th is fax ~.'ith .yotlr trta.FOrS, cot~t~cilmetnbers and staff to keep them abreast of impor- itt ,netro cit. v 145 ['niversio,. Avettt~e II/est St. Paul .¥1.¥ 55105-2044 Phone: (651) 215-4000 ~'ax: (65l) 281-1299 £-mail: a,ntn.~a,nml 4$.org The report also indicates that the Builders and the Metropolitan Council are attempting to resolve the issue. This Friday, Nov. 17 installment of the report could examine the role of local government procedures and policies in contributing to housing costs. The exact content of the Friday report is not known but possible topics include the amount of fees charged for development and building zoning policies and the growing sentiment to "no growth". If you have any reaction to the report please contact Gene at AMM early next week. Mayors Housing its roport to the The Mayors Task Force has com- pleted its report and will present it to the Metropolitan Council on Wednes- day, Nov. 29 The reportwill be distrib- uted to cities, non-profits and other interested parties for review and com- ment. The report could be the basis for a region meeting to discuss strategies to develop and maintain affordable Governor Discusses Budget Priorities at St. Cloud Meeting On Monday Nov 13. the Governor and several commis- sioners met with local government off:,cia's to discuss budget prior;ties and tr, e ~,g Pian While triere were no specific proposa;s, the ©overr, o¢ and the commissioners stated thai the proposed biennial budget increase will not exceed the inflation rate The Governor also noted that the details of tax. education and development propos- als should be available within the next six weeks As part of the meeting local officials were asked to respond to a series of questions regarding policy preferences The results of the survey that was conducted elec- tronically will be available on the State Planning web site within the next week Task Force to present Metropolitan Council housing The report includes several findings and recommendations on such topics as leadership zoning and planning funding, regulations, technical assistance and social services. An AMM F*~0( NEWS scheduled for the last week of November will provide a sum- mary of the findings and recommenda- tions /~ '"7 =~'-~ LEN HARRELL Chief of Police TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 Kandis Hanson Chief Len Harrell Monthly Report for October, 2000 STATISTICS The police department responded to 942 calls for service during the month of October. There were 24 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 aggravated, 1 burglary, 1 arson, I vehicle theft, and 20 larcenies. There were 100 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses 7 child abuse, 4 forgery/NSF check, 1 weapons, 12 criminal damage to property, 4 narcotics, 11 liquor law violations, 6 DUI's, 6 simple assaults, 14 domestics (8 with assaults), 4 harassment, 1 trespassing, and 30 other offenses. The patrol division issued 116 adult and 7 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 26 tickets. Warnings were issued to 88 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 2 adults and 2 juveniles arrested for felonies and 30 adults and 22 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. There were 8 misdemeanor adult warrant arrests. The departmem assisted in 13 vehicle accidents; 2 with injuries. There were 30 medical emergencies and 51 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 17 occasions in October and requested assistance 22 times. MOIYND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - October, 2000 II. III. IV. INVESTIGATIONS Investigator Niccum worked on 3 child protection issues and 2 criminal sexual conduct cases in October. Other cases included robbery, burglary, arson, assault, theft, narcotics, absenting, vulnerable adult, malicious punishment of a child, possession of stolen property, passing counterfeit money, damage to property, fraud, threats, harassment, vehicle theft, and forgery. Formal complaints were issued for criminal sexual conduct, domestic assault, theft, assault, gross misdemeanor DWI, trespass, disorderly conduct, marijuana in a motor vehicle, driving after revocation, DWI refusal to test, unlicensed tree trimmer, barking dog, and dog at large. PERSONNEL/STAFFING The department used approximately 82 hours of overtime during the month of October. Officers used 23 hours of comp-time, 179 hours of sick time, and 89 hours of vacation. Officers earned 36 hours of comp time. TRAINING Officers attended a four block of constitutional law regarding search and seizure. Support staff attended four hours of training during the month of October as well. CSO Salter attended recertification for First Responders. V. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER CSO Salter had 319 calls for service; 28 animal complaints, 73 ordinance violations, and 218 miscellaneous contacts. VI. RESERVES The reserves donated 76 hours of community service in the month of October. The unit consists of seven members currently. CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAO MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 October 27, 2000 Sheriff Patrick D. McGowan Hennepin County Sheriff Room 6 Courthouse 350 South Fiffla Street Minneapolis, MN 55415 Dear SheriffMcGowan: The city council for the City of Mound recently revie~ved your letter of September 25, 2000 at our council meeting and felt compelled to notify you of our displeasure with the decision to discontinue transport service at night. The decision will significantly impact the smaller communities in Hennepin County who may only have one officer working and depend on the transport service. The impact for the City of Mound is that police officers would be "unavailable" for an additional hour to an hour and a half per transport. According to police department records, there were approximately thirty transports downtown in the first nine months of this year. Figuring for an entire year, the additional cost to our community could average over $5,000 in lost officer time. This is a significant concern for our community! It seems incongruent that the opening of the new Public Safety Facility should be done at the expense of other services previously provided. We have all had to deal with challenging budget constraints and now well into our process are notified of shortfalls at the county exacerbating our own challenges within the city. Sincerely, Patricia Meisel Mayor of Mound Cc: County Commissioners prlnte~ on recycled paper LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLIC 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 Memo To= Kandis Hanson From: 'Len Harrell ~ Datm 10/12/00 Re:. Sheriff's Transport Change I have attached the letter from the sheriff's office notifying departments that they will no longer provide pdsoner transport after midnight because of budget constraints at the county. Per your request, I have attempted to pull together some numbers to show the possible impact on the police department. Since January 1, 2000, we have lodged 67 people in jail or the detention center downtown. Approximately half (33) have been taken down after midnight either by our officers or in combination with our officers and the transport service. Transport has normally met our squads in Minnetonka or Wayzata to assist with transporting prisoners downtown. The reduction of the "dog watch" transport will require our officers to transport prisoners from Mound to the jail downtown, approximately twenty miles away. Our "dog watch" officers are working alone the majority of the time which means that the City will be without coverage for approximately two hours each transport. Based upon the figures for nine months, approximately forty-four transports take place after midnight when the majority of the time we have only one officer on duty. If one were to look at calling officers in to assist in transports to maintain an officer on the street the cost would be approximately $5,280 (using a $60/hr overtime rate with mileage). This is a %'orst case" scenado where every time a transport is needed there is only one officer on which may not be the actual case. · Page 1 PATRICK D. McGOWAN iHENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF ROOM 8 COURTHOUSE 350 SOUTH FIFTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 (612) 348-3740 FAX 348-4208 September 25, 2000 OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF Chief Leonard Harrell Mound Police Department 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear ChiefHarrell: At the September 2000 meeting of the Hennepin Chiefs of Police Association, I announced that the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office will be discontinuing our prisoner transport service on the night shift. know this service has been helpful to you by keeping your officers in your community, however, I want T u to know that our decision to discontinue this service was driven by the economic realities of the scal Year 2001 Hennepin County departmental budgets. We have recently completed what has been a very challenging budget cycle. All Hennepin County departments and offices have been directed to prepare 2001 budgets not to exceed 2% of tax revenues. In addition, the Sheriff's Office was forced to make further compromises in order to balance the demands of opening the new Public Safety Facility in August 2001. For the first time in this Administration, we have been forced to reduce law enforcement services in order to meet our mandated county budget guidelines. This is a painful decision for us and we acknowledge that it will place additional hardship upon your department, as well. We apologize for this inconvenience, but rest assured we will continue to support you in every way we are able. We ask for your understanding as we straggle to meet county financial goals. Should you have any questions in this policy change, please contact Inspector Bill Wilen at (612) 348-9650. Sincer/~ Patrick D. McGowan Hennepin County Sheriff Recycled Paper 20% Post- Consumer Fiber Metropolitan Council Provisional Population Estimate April 1, 1999 MOUND Housing Units 1990 Census 1999 Estimated 1999 Estimated Occupied Housing By Type Housing Units Completed Housing Units Households Single-family 3,067 3,209 3,084 884 922 794 Multifamily (incl. town homes) Mobile Home 14 15 13 Total 3,965* 4,146 3,891 Household Estimate 1990 Census Households 3,710 1999 Household Estimate 3,891 Population Estimate 1990 Census Total Population 9,634 1990 Group Quarters Population 0 1990 Population in Households 9,634 1999 Population Estimate 9,812 1999 Group Quarters Population 0 9,812 1999 Population in Households Persons per Household 1990 Census Persons per Household 2.60 2.52 1999 Persons per Household All numbers are as of April 1 of each year. *This total includes 11 unit(s) listed in "other" housing in the 1990 Census data. The Census defines these units as those not fitting the defined housing categories, such as houseboats, railroad cars, campers and vans. Since no information on "other" units is available between censuses, for purposes of 1999 population and household estimation, these units have been allocated to the single and multiple family categories. This was done based on persons per "other" household and the ratio of single-family to multifamily housing in the jurisdiction Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning .for the Future June 9,2000 FRANCENE CLARK, CLERK/ACTING CITY MANAGER CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 Dear MS CLARK: The Metropolitan Council research staff has prepared a preliminary population and household estimate as of April 1, 1999 for your community. Enclosed for your review is a 1998 worksheet which includes 1990 Census background data. The estimates are used by the Council to monitor population and household change throughout the region. We strive to provide accurate estimates that treat municipalities consistently. Questions concerning how the estimates are determined should be directed to me at (612) 602- 1332 or by e-mail at kathy.iohnson~,metc.state.mn.us. No reply from you is necessary. If you have comments regarding the estimates please submit them to me in writing. This will ensure that issues are addressed in a timely manner. The Department of Revenue requests finalized estimates from us by late June for use in their local aid and other formulas. To comply, we need to hear from you by June 21, 2000. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Kathy Johnson Community Development Division Enclosure 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Mlnnesor. a 55101-1626 (651) 602-1000 Fax 602-1550 TOD/TrY 291-0904 Metro lnlb Line 602-1888 An F~uol O.l~orruni~ Em~iouer 4 7 ~'~. ~ Page 1 of 3 KandisHanson From: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us> To: <kandishanson@msn.com>; Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:53 PM Subject: westonka.news Vol. 1, No. 8 westonka.news Vol. 1, No. 8 November 21, 2000 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. westonka.news publishes weekly. Due to the Thanksgiving holiday, this issue is coming to you a little earlier than usual. Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN 55364; _http://www.westonka.k12.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten@westo n ka. k 12.mn. us. Contents 1. News Briefs --Update: Changes in School Year Calendar, January-June 2001 --Referendum Research, Technology Evaluation Reports 2. Upcoming Events 3. We Want to Hear from You NEWS BRIEFS **Update: Changes in School Year Calendar, January-June 2001'* Editor's note: This Thanksgiving season, I'm grateful for readers who have excellent attention to detail and notice when I cite a day of the week that doesn't match up with the date. Such was the case with last week's issue. With my apologies, here is the corrected copy: The changes that affect student attendance days are as follows: --Monday, February 26, will be a "Late Start" Day for grades K-4 only; middle school and high school students will start class at their usual time --Friday, March 30, will be a regular full school day for grades K-12 (formerly an "Early 11/21/2000 Page 2 of 3 Release" day for grades K-4) --Friday, April 27, will be a teacher workshop day with no school for grades K-12 (formerly an "Early Release" day for grades K-12) --Thursday, June 7, will be the last day of school for grades K-4 (instead of Friday, June 8). The final K-4 teacher workshop day will therefore be June 8 instead of June 11. **Referendum Research, Technology Evaluation Reports** Preliminary reports on two major areas of interest will be presented at the Special Study Session of the Westonka School Board on Monday, November 27. At 6:30 p.m., representatives from Decision Resources, Inc., will present preliminary findings regarding community support for a possible Westonka Public Schools bond referendum for routine maintenance and technology early next calendar year. Earlier this fall, Decision Resources did a random, scientific survey of 400 households in our community. The firm is highly regarded for its ability to accurately gauge the "referendum pulse" of a community. At 7:30 p.m., representatives from Elert & Associates will report findings from their review of the District's current five-year technology plan. The primary goal for the external review was to determine whether the district is "on track" with technology with regard to its use with learners. Like all meetings of the School Board, the Special Study Session is open to the public. It will be held in Room 200 of Shirley Hills Primary School, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound. UPCOMING EVENTS --"Planning for the Future," an information session for parents of children with disabilities, Tuesday, November 28, 6-7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High School. Session will cover: working with your school team; identifying community resources; vocational and career planning; and skills necessary for independent living. Free and open to the public. Call 491- 8030 to reserve your seat. VVE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU! We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or anything other school- related issue. Use whichever way works best for you: send an e-mail message to <welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us>; call the District Feedback Line at 952.491.8260; or mail your comments to Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A 11/21/2000 NOVEMBER 2000 This is the time of year to count one's blessings. We at Reed & Pond have been contemplating the many things for which we are gateful. Certainly our country and our clients have to be high on our list. It seems appropriate at this time of a new millennium to renew our appreciation for our form of government and to be thankful that our nation was founded on a system of laws to control our relationships with each other and with our government. You don't have to agree with every verdict to be thankful for our legal system. While no system of justice can ever be perfect and our perception of justice varies according to our background and experience, we can all join in appreciating what it means to live in America. Reed & Pond is celebrating its 20-year anniversary, and we would like you to know that we are grateful to all of you who have allowed us to act as your advocate or to analyze your legal affairs. We consider it a privilege to have some small part to play in the administration of justice. We hope that over the past years we have helped you to understand your rights and bring more order to your lives. Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future November 13, 2000 Patricia Meisel, Mayor City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Meisel: This letter is to inform local units of government that five positions on the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission are open for appointment. The positions are the chair, and citizen members representing Comrnission District A (Metropolitan Council Districts 1 and 2), District B (3 and 4), District C (5 and 6) and District D (7 and 8) (see enclosed map). Parks and Open Space Commission appointments are governed under the Minnesota Open Appointments process administered by the Secretary of State; therefore, interested individuals should contact the Secretary of State's office at 651/297-5845 for an application form. Completed applications are to be returned to the Secretary of State. The deadline for persons applying for these appointments is Dec. 22, 2000. After receipt by the Secretary of State, the applications are forwarded to the Metropolitan Council. Applicants will be asked to appear for an interview at a public meeting conducted by a Metropolitan Council appointments committee. The public meeting(s) will be held in January. The Metropolitan Council will also notify legislators in the affected district of the names and backgrounds of the applicants and solicit their recommendations. Following the public meeting, the appointments committee will meet to review the information received and develop an appointment recommendation. It is expected that appointments will be made by the Metropolitan Council in February. The Metropolitan Council invites local units of government to participate in this appointment process by encouraging citizens who have an interest in the work of the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission to become applicants. Qualifications for membership include: applicant must be a resident of the commission district for which they are seeking appointment, and shall not during the term of office hold the office of Metropolitan Council member, be a member of the Metropolitan Airports Commission or Sports Facilities Commission, or hold any judicial office. If you have any questions about this appointment process, please call Julie Opsahl of the Council staff at 651/602-1630. The Metropolitan Council would like to thank local units of government for participating in this process and encourages you to forward to us any recommendations you may have on the appointments to be made. Sincerely, Ted Mondale Chair Enclosure cc: Francene Clark, Clerk 230 East Fifth Street ,, St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1626 {651 } 602-1000 Fax 602-1550 An Equal Oppor~u~if~4 Emp/o~er TDD/TTY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 602-1888 Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission District Boundaries August 1999 Metropolitan Council eur~ )ka 9 Wasl epin 10 15 20 l~a~ M~kst Tv~ 25 IVfiles w~ ,Point Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Co,-,uafission District Boundaries CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT Oct. 2000 83.33% Oct. 2000 BUDGET EXPENSE GENERAL FUND Council 77,620 Promotions 4,000 Cable TV 26,000 City Manager/Clerk 198,750 Elections 12,450 Assessing 68,000 Finance 175,400 Computer 22,100 Legal 146,980 Police 1,049,650 Civil Defense 12,150 Planning/Inspections 208,250 Streets 485,990 City Property 76,890 Parks 208,050 Summer Recreation 39,570 Contingencies 106,780 Transfers 166,120 YTD PERCENT EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED 15,296 84,896 0 4,000 60 18,535 16,423 165,025 3,292 4,920 11 71,344 13,202 144,567 1,656 7,442 4,790 93,305 52,336 796,678 (818) 7,686 18,408 186,805 37,586 434,917 6,124 64,169 8,603 180,624 0 0 0 650 13,843 138~433 (7,276) 0 7,465 33,725 7,530 (3,344) 30,833 14,658 53,675 252,972 4,464 21.445 51. 073 12 721 27 426 39 570 106 130 27~687 109.37% 100.00% 71.29% 83.03% 39.52% 104.92% 82.42% 33.67% 63,48% 75.90% 63,26% 89,70% 89.49% 83.46% 86.82% O.OO% 0.61% 83.33% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3~084~750 190,812 2,403~996 680,754 77.93% Area Fire Service Fund 411,520 TIF 1-2 0 Recycling Fund 124,980 Liquor Fund 238,920 Water Fund 441,360 Sewer Fund 939,410 Cemetery Fund 8,190 Dock Fund 80,640 14,776 246,720 164,800 59.95% 20,941 700,406 (700,406) 839 81,841 43,139 65.48% 25,087 218,285 20,635 91.36% 23,725 358,838 82,522 81.30% 56,732 710,022 229,388 75.58% 1,079 6,369 1,821 77.77% 5,205 58,077 22,563 72.02% Exp-00 11/2012000 Gino CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT Oct. 2000 83.33% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from Other Funds Charges to Other Departments Oct. 2000 Y'rD PERCENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED 1,344,330 0 702,444 (641,886) 52.25% 4,210 0 3,515 (695) 83.49% 116,200 26,758 153,641 37,441 132.22% 963,800 68,829 562,339 (401,461) 58.35% 85,700 20,812 104,197 18,497 121.58% 100,000 7,647 96,387 (3,613) 96.39% 63,500 37,947 56,213 (7,287) 88.52% 47,500 0 0 (47,500) 0.00% 13,000 1,427 12,263 /737) 94.33% TOTAL REVENUE 2~738,240 163,420 1,690,999 (1,047,241) 61.75% FIRE FUND RECYCLING FUND LIQUOR FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCK FUND 377,470 45,779 359,787 (17,683) 95.32% 115,600 7,048 111,050 (4,550) 96.06% 1,750,000 146,121 1,530,067 (219,933) 87.43% 500,000 46,649 383,538 (116,462) 76.71% 960,000 86,396 815,614 (144,386) 84.96% 6,200 800 3,730 (2,470) 60.16% 86,000 33 68,478 (17,522) 79.63% 11120/2000 rev00 Gino General Fund $863,911 CDBG 1,756 Area Fire Protection Services 310,734 MSA 20,627 Sealcoat (46,381) PW Facility 90,833 Capital Improvement 314,836 CDB 4,123 Commerce Place TIF (20,361) Downtown TIF 1-2 (896,010) Grant Revolving 7,725 Co Rd 15 7,783 Recycling 93,274 Liquor Store 446,085 Water 818,651 Sewer 761,985 Cemetery 2,394 Dock 248,059 Fire Relief (75,975) HRA 1,891 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 1112012000 CashReportCouncil Gino 0 O0 C (,.) 0 '- 0 ~ ~ 0 w w w izl ~ ~ ~ z z z z ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C C C C 0 0 0 0 E E E E Minnesota Lawful Gambling Government ACknowledgment Form - LG503 Use of This Form Certain Contributions Prohibited If an organization wishes lo conlribule gambling lundS to a unit o[ government, the organizallon and uni( ol government must complele this form. 2. Approval o! the Gambling Conlrol Board is nol required. 3. The form must be kepi on file by Ihe licensed organi- zation. 4. Atlach a copy ot thts form to your Schedule C repod for the monlh In which Ihe funds are spenl. O r g a n i.....__._.__za ti o n Information Organization Minnesola Slalules, section 34g.12. subdivision 25(b)(6), prohibi(s 'a conlrihulion to a slalutory or home rule or charter ¢ily, COunly, or lown by a licensed organization wilh Ihe knowledge that Ihe governmental unit inlands Io use Ihe conhibulion for a pension or reliremenl lurid." Minnesota Rules, parl 7861.0120, subpart 5D(10), prohibits "any contribution or expenditure to the extent Ihal it resulls In any net monelary gain or other pecuniary benefit Io the organizalion making the conlrtbulion or expenditure." Phone Number c 'oas conlained ~n Minnesola S~a[ules. section 34g. ~ subdivfsi°n ~5(b}(6); and Minnesola Rules pad 786~.0120, subpart 5D(10). G o v e r..._...._...._.~n m e n t Information blame ol Government Date Check lype of governmenl: ~ ~Clty E~ Counly E~ Township E~ School Dislrict NO. [] Slale of Minnesota, Oepadmenl of ['"'-J United Slales, Deparlmenl of ~] OIher Government Entily.- specify: Amounl o! lawful purpose conlribulion received,' Phone Number (c~2..) '4 '7,D -ObDO Slale Zip o! Division o[ Division %,o00 We are aware of lhe reskicfions conlained in Minnesota Slalules, section 34g. 12, subdivision 25(b)(6); and Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0120, subpart 50(I0). vernmenl Agenl Tllle Date This form will be made available In allernalive formal (i.e. large prinl, Braille) upon requesl. II you use a TTY, you can call us by using Ihe Mlnnesola Relay Service at !-800-627.3529 and ask Io place a call to (612) 63g-4000. The information requesled on lhis form will become public informa- lion when received by Ihe Board, and will be used Io delermine your compliance wilh Minnesola slalules ~nd rules governing law- Jul gambling aclivilids. IEinnesot L wfui Gambling " Government Acknowledgment Form - LG503 Use of This Form I1' an organization wishes to conlribule gambling funds to a unit pt government, the organization and unit pt government must complete this form. 2. Approval of the Gambling Control Board is not required. 3. The form must be kept on file by the licensed organi- zation. 4. Altach a copy of this form to your Schedule C report for the month In which the funds are spent. Certain Contributions Prohibited Minnesola Slalules, seclion 34g.12. subdivision 25(b)(6). prohibits "a conlribution to a statutory or home rule or charter city, county, or town by a licensed organizalion wilh the knowledge Ihat lhe governmental unit inlands to use Ihe conlribulion for a pension or retiremenl fund.' Minnesola Rules, part 7861.0120, subpart 5D(10), prohibils 'any contribution or expenditure to ~he extent Iha! it results in any net monetary gain or o~her pecuniary benefit to Ihe organization making the conlribution or expenditure.' Phone Number License Number Organization Information Organization Address City State Zip We are aware of the restrictions contained in Minnesola Slatules, section 349.12, subdivision 25(b)(6); and Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0120, subpad 5D(10). Signature ol Chiel Execulive Officer (CEO) Prinl Name Dale Government Information Name ol Government Cily d Check type ot govemmenl: ~Cily [~ Courtly ' '[~ Township '-] Stale pi Minnesota, Department o! [~ Untied Slales, Department pi '-'] Olher Government Enlily ~ specify: Amounl ol lawful purpose conlribulion received: J~] School Dislricl No. o! , Division Division o! Slale Zip We are aware of the restrictions conlained in Minnesota Sta{utes, section 349.12, subdivision 25(b)(6); and Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0120, subpart 5D(10). Signature pi Government Agenl Print Name Tille Dale This form will be made available in allemalive formal (i.e. large prinl, The informalion requesled on lhis t'orm will become public inlorma- Braille) upon requesL I! you use a 'I-FY, you can call us by using the Minnesola Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 and ask lo place a call to (612) 639-4000. (g/gT) lion when received by Ihe Board, and will be used to determine your compliance with Minnesola stalules and rules governing law- ful gambling activilies. . Join us at our... 4th Annual Open House Thursday December 7 2000 4:00 to 7:00 pm Hoisington Koegter Group Inc. Minneapolis Warehouse Distdct 123 North Third Street, Suite 100 Please R.S.¥.R to Lynette by December 4'h Phone: 612.252.7129 e-mail: tynette~hkgi.com Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Agenda - Nov. 17, 7:15 - 9:00 a.m. Mound City Hnll 1. Social Coffee, tea, rolls, fruit and juice start at 7:15 2. Introductions 7:30 3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes 4. Announcements (5 min.) 5. Nominations and Vote for Chairperson and Vice Chair Person (15 mm.) We will be choosing a new chairperson and vice chair person to lead the Collaborative in 2001. 6. "Comm,mlty" and Fnmily Life First - Gina Coburn Gina Coburn will talk to us about creating an intentional "community." She is also involved in the Family Life First initiate in the Wayzata area. Join us in discussing and brainstorming how we can create better community in Westonka. Did we ask you about receiving this agenda by e. mail? Please inform Leah if you would like to receive the agenda and minutes via e-mail, if you haven't already done so. REMINDER: There will be no meeting in December. Enjoy the extra time with your families! Next meeting will be January 19th, 2001. "Think highly of yourself, for the world takes you at your own estimate." By Anonymous Health Carol Olson, Patricia Anderson, Sandy Olstad, Carolyn Schmidt, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz The newspaper article on Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) has been written by Sara Hames, a high school student. The newspaper needs help finding contacts for the ads that they will sell to local resources for SAD. The Health Work Group continues to monitor the progress of the Health Advocate Outreach Project. Youth Activities Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Chris Valerius, Sue Cathers, Jean Ann Thayer, Patsy Kiesow The Youth Center is open! Every Tuesday the kids go to Presbyterian Homes and every Thursday the kids are at St. Johns HARBOR. Sue Cathers and Ashley Clift (student) are the supervisors of the youth center. Our first adventure to Presbyterian Homes was very interesting and will be a great experience for the kids and the residents alike. We need help with the skate park. Any ideas? Parenting Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Jeanne Stortz, Bill Erickson Misty Snow will be the featured speaker on Feb. 3. There will be half hour breakout sessions after Misty's keynote featuring Brian Powers discussing depression, Kathy Jones talking about current trends in chemical use, and representatives from Wayzata's Family Life First initiative talking about their program to take back family life. Community Margaret Holste, Cathy Bailey, Cheryl Fischer, Edith Travers This group still hasn't met. PR/Media Jeanne Stortz, Lisa Whalen, Anne Wilbur, Carol Olson We are working on a communications plan. It will be a complete plan of ways to distribute informatiou about local events. This plan can be used by all of our work groups and other groups. Should the name of this group change to Communications? That's the recommendation. Finance and Operations Mike Looby, Len Harrell, Margaret Holste, Craig Anderson, Patricia Anderson The Finance and Operations hasn't met yet. Leah is meeting with Mike Looby, budget expert, to find out the best way to pull together all of our budget requests and available money. This will be presented to the F and O work group for recommendations to the WHCC. Executive Carol Olson, Jeanne Stortz, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer, Sue Cathers, Mike Looby The Executive work group will be discussing fundraising for the skate park. There is a chance to send some kids to a breakfast with some top Viking football players. We will discuss who to connect with. Westonka Healthy Communi~ Collaborative Minutes · Oct. 20, 2000 Present: Craig Anderson. Patricia Anderson. Mary Goode. Mike Looby. Jeanette Metz. Carol OIson. John Rogers. Carolyn Schmidt. Jeanne Stortz. Edith Travers. Sandy Raushendorfer. Leah Weycker. Sandy Wing. Announcemenls and Addition.~' or Chwlges to the .4genda or .1/linutes: Patricia Anderson announced a good speaker that will be at St. Davids Church. Mike Looby made a motion to approve the minutes and Patricia seconded the motion. Passed We talked about sending the Collaborative's agenda to members via e-mail. If you would like that form of notice about our meetings let Leah know. Barb Olson. communications specialist at the school district, is starting a "Key Communicators" network to exchange correct, accurate and timely information about what is going on at the school district. Anyone interested in receiving intbrmation via email is asked to sign up with Leah. You are only asked to give feedback to the information when needed. Jeanne Stortz asked if the collaborative could contribute information. Leah will let Barb Olson know that we have additional information for the "slow" news day's. Craig Anderson talked about us doing a web site for more in-depth and not time sensitive information. Work group and strategic planning goals: Sandy Wing talked about the need for more members and more parents. We should target parents of middle and high school age kids. Time availability is an issue for parents. We could do something similar to the Key Communicators for busy parents. Craig suggested using e-mail to do a mini survey asking parents what they want and the best time to do it. Mike Looby suggested contacting the principals and using the school newsletters. Craig reminded us of the student run newscasts at the high school. We could have the kids do the announcements. We need to get more kids involved. Patricia suggested finding youth through the leadership classes. Jeanette reminded us that we need to really listen to the youth and be willing to follow through with them. They talk and act in different ways. It was suggested that we have special meetings that are geared to the youth. We talked about the skate park. Craig said he was willing to bring the design plan to Chemstone. Think about this - "Build it and they will come." Pastor John talked about the land between his house and City, Hall. There is a need for a BMX or bike track. The kids have built their own in the land south of St. John's. Could a BMX track be in the woods next to City Hall? We wouldn't have to cut all the trees. Leah will check this out. We need tangible visible outcomes. We discussed the pros and cons of the location of the skate park. We need to let the media know that we need land. We talked about transportation being a huge issue for kids and adults in our area. Leah will see if Hennepin Co. can help. We drew names for the tickets to the charity basketball game. We should have drawings every meeting. To: Everyone From: Lois VanDyke Subject: stressed CC: Date Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2000 11:50 AM Stress We all handle stress differently. For instance, two people may handle the stress of a promotion differently. One person may feel invigorated by the newly-instilled confidence placed in her, while the other may tear that he is really not up to the challenge. So. how can we deal with stress more effectively? Here are some tips for dealing with stress from the author and from the Mind Tools - Effective Stress Management website. www.mindtools.com 1. Follow a healthy lifestyle. You know the deal - healthy diet, exercise, and adequate sleep. If you tend to pillage and plunder the kitchen cabinets when you're stressed, make sure you have healthy and tasty food choices available. 2. Make fun a priority, in your life. Peter Pan was right. Don't grow up. 3. Find time to be alone. No distractions from e-mails, faxes, phones, or humans. Defend your time alone ruthlessly. 4. Keep a stress diaz'. Note when you're feeling stressed. You may notice a pattern you can intercept before it becomes a health issue. 5. Reevaluate you commitments. If your daily schedule would tax a campaigning presidential hopeful, something is wrong. Cut back on commitments until you have got a handle on your stress. 6. Develop a hobby. Make sure it is not a competitive endeavor, just something you can relax and enjoy doing for its own sake. 7. Remember that beauty, may be fleeting. But it is never frivolous. Buy yourself flowers, visit a local museum, or watch the birds at your birdfeeder. Nature is a natural destressor. 8. Develop a ~upport system. If you lack supportive people around you, seek out people who are willing and able to be supportive. 9. Laugh. Have you ever noticed how difficult it is to feel stressed or down when you are laughing'? Turn off the news and watch a fimny movie instead. It is unrealistic to think we can eliminate all the stress in our lives. But we can certainly change how we deal with it. Page 1 MINUTES - EDC - AUGUST 17, 2000 The meeting was called to order by Mark Brewer at approximately 7:15 a.m. Members present were Jerry Pietrowski, Suzanne Claywell, Stan Drahos, and Mark Brewer. Others present were Kandis Hanson, Bob Brown, Bruce Chamberlain, Gino Businaro, Fran Clark and Ken Custer. Absent were Paul Meisel and Sharon McMenamy-Cook. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION made by Stan Drahos and seconded by Jerry Pietrowski to approve the July 20th meeting and the July 27, 2000 special meeting. The motion passed unanimously. PROJECT UPDATES MOUND FAMILY HARDWARE: The City Manager reported everything is going well, the steel is up and they are making good progress. One problem was they did not apply for a permit from the MCWD, however, the application has now been submitted. We were first told they would not entertain this permit until September 14th, however, there has been some positive indicators that they actually handed it over to the staff earlier this week and it will be dealt with it at their next meeting. The City Manager stated they routinely put every application into a 21 day holding pattern while a review is made, however there is a provision in the resolution that was adopted that needs only minor amending in order to allow the project to proceed. This will be back on the council agenda for next Tuesday. The City Manager reported they are also applying for the Health Department permits that are needed. There was a discussion of the problems that have had to be overcome in this project. Jerry advised all projects, especially of this size, have obstacles to overcome. Mark asked if there was anything we could do to assist them at this point. The City Manager reported that she was not aware of anything. Mark shared that he has been through many MCWD district meetings. He asked if there was any reason to believe they had any objection to the project. Stan Drahos stated he did not believe so. The City Manager stated that the only time they would be opposed to seeing it move forward would be if the project is proceeding without their permit. It was mentioned that they did suggest the City issue a stop work order on the project because they did not have a MCWD permit. The City Manager stated that it is in our best interest as well as Mound True Valu to see the project move forward. EDC Minutes 08-17-00 POST OFFICE PROJECT: Bruce Chamberlain reported that we will be closing on the land this week. He stated it is likely one site will be obtained through condemnation with the quick take occurring on Friday. The post office is proceeding with their plans, though the city has not yet received a formal submittal from them. We have, however, received drawings of the building and the site and we have given them back with our comments. Bruce stated he believed they are incorporating some of those ideas as well as working out some of the issues brought forth. Bruce stated he is trying to get a more definitive schedule for their bid date and start of construction. Stan asked if both lands were being purchased in the same way. Bruce stated offers have been presented to both property owners but they have also filed for condemnation. Bruce stated he has stayed completely out of the negotiation process so he has not received any comments from Willette. Mark asked if we would be able to review their design. Bruce answered that he would have the plans available from the postal service for the next meeting. Mark asked how much influence we will be able to have regarding their design guidelines or for that matter, the design and guidelines of any other developer. Bruce stated we do have some influence because we can put Tax Increment Financing dollars towards the project. Bruce said that the post office has not asked for any TIF money, but TIF is a means the City can use to encourage developers to incorporate the design ideas the City wants to accomplish. Bruce acknowledge that the City has less influence over design in the post office as it would with a project like Langdon or Auditors because we're not as intricately involved in the development process. Bruce went on to explain that when the post office goes up for bid, they will select the contractor and the new owner of the property. Construction is suppose to start this fall with their completion date set for the end of March 2001 but it will probably be pushed back one or two months. Stan was concerned about the actual completion date being pushed back indefinitely. Bruce explained that the City really has no way to demand a specific date for it to be completed unless we demand the post office be out of the building by a certain date. He was concerned about doing that because the post office really has three more years on their lease. As soon as the post office has moved the city can go in and demolish the existing building. Bruce explained that we will be using MSA dollars to tear the building down. The construction of County Rd. 15 is on the county's 2002 CIP. Bruce stated the Auditor's Road extension will be completed with the county road project and the Greenway project will be completed next summer. We have a permit application into the MCWD right now for that Greenway project, which is the last permit needed. Bruce said the plans are almost completed on that project so we are about ready to go out for bids. Bruce stated that United Property who is one of the property owners, has expressed interest in developing the post office so they may be bidding on the project. They 2 EDC Minutes 08-17--00 would like to work out an arrangement where they would not have to give up ownership of their site. There are a ~eries of o0tions that would allow them, if riley were the successful bidder, to hold onto the property and not have to sell it and then repurchase it. They have been informed that obviously, the only way this can be done is if a negotiated price was worked out for the property, rather than having to go through condemnation. BEARD DEVELOPMENT: The City Manager reported that Bill Beard attended the last HRA meeting and expressed his regrets for his inability to be our developer at this time. The City manager stated there was an accurate account of this in the Laker Newspaper. She stated we regretted this happened and preferred to work with Bill Beard over anyone else but pointed out she is optimistic that everything will work out for the best. She explained that in Beard's letter he requested that if he could get the numbers to work out he would like to be reconsidered. She stated the council felt positive about him and his project so if he works out the numbers while we are regrouping, we would be willing to reconsider him. The City Manager further explained Bill Beard had asked for another extension but it was denied because it could possibly just prolong the wait and this way, we can use this period of time to step back, take another look, and see if there is possibly another developer for us on this project. She said that Beard had indicated in his letter that he had put a significant amount of money and emotional investment into the project. Bruce explained that it is likely Beard had over $100,000 invested in the project. The City Manager stated that most of what we have spent would have been spent regardless of who we were working with so it is still money worth spent. Kandis explained that Beard had come to the City requesting an extension and he was given a 55 day extension. She stated during that time he continued to work his spread sheets relentlessly manipulating them in an attempt to close the dollar gap. She stated that at one point he was $3,100,000 apart but by the time he submitted his letter to us, he was $2,000,000 apart. We continued working with him on a weekly basis at the project team meetings and Bruce met with him individually attempting to close that gap. With this in mind, the writing was really on the wall at the time he asked for the extension. She explained that it was good for the City to give him the first extension but a second extension was not a practical thing for the City to entertain. Stan stated that Scott from Scotty B's requested him to mention that because of what has happened, he is interested in starting a development on his own. He stated there may be others that are also interested in doing the same. He stated he would be willing to keep the same scheme that the City wants. He expressed to Stan that he would like an opportunity to meet with the City to pursue this endeavor. Stan explained that Scott is concerned about his building being torn down without him having a new location for his business. Bruce told Stan that he was aware of this and was also working with Ken Custer on an option that includes business and property owners. Bruce stated this is one scenario that is being explored. The City Manager stated the EDC Minutes 08-17-00 Project Team met with Ken yesterday and is scheduled to meet with Scotty B's next week. She also explained that by allowing the agreement with Beard to lapse, we can now entertain other proposals. REDEVELOPMENT OF AUDITORS ROAD DISTRICT AND LANGDON DISTRICT: The City Manager shared that we have regrouped and established a work program establishing a schedule in locating a subsequent developer. There will be a very concentrated effort for the next five to six months to establish who would be the best developer for the Mound Vision Project. She stated there will be a packet of information that will be given to interested developers stating the criteria we are looking for. Each central property owner will be personally contacted and if they show an interest in submitting a proposal to the City, they will be given the packet and the opportunity to submit their plans. There was a discussion of the pros and cons of having many different developers doing their own project. Bob Brown asked that with us now considering individuals instead of a one developer, what our protection would be against having many different looking buildings instead of one flowing concept. Mark agreed this is conceivably a problem because we had previously decided we would not put a lot of teeth into design rules. If we went with one developer there would be continuity to the project but if we went with several developers, there is a concern of buildings not fitting the concept plan. Bruce explained that one thing that will be done is to put more into the design guidelines so they are more specific. We will also be recommending to the HRA to adopt them as policy for the expenditure of TIF and any public subsidy. The City Manager added that if we attach this to the criteria that was adopted within the last few months, we can apply it to the Revolving Loan Fund, tax abatement, TIF, and the City contribution of land. This can then be one of the conditions to the developer agreement for any form of subsidy given by the City. So for at least the life of the agreement (which would have been 25 years for the Beard Group) we can have a say in the design without actually making it an ordinance. Bruce pointed out that in many towns there are several property owners and developers but the buildings fit very well together and if we do a good job with the design guidelines that will be enhanced, we can expect the same thing. So even if the buildings differ architecturally, they will have the common theme or element that will make them compliment each other. Jerry Pietrowski stated that he was excited that business owners are interested in getting involved with the development project. He also believed the business owners would be very willing to work with the City regarding the design of their buildings. The City Manager agreed that this could turn out to be the best thing for the City. Bruce reported that Phase I of the Environmental assessment for most of the downtown area, Langdon District, Auditors District, True Value District, and the post office site has 4 EDC Minutes 08-17-00 been completed. The only site that appears completely clean is the post office site, everything else has some level of contamination on it. The environmental consultant came in and went through the reports with the City. He stated that the clean up could actually hold up the project unless we are as proactive as possible on it. Bruce stated that at the HRA meeting on Tuesday, he will be requesting them to allow the completion of the Phase I and then have a Phase II Environmental assessment done on the Lost Lake site, so the park and ride lot construction isn't held up. He will also be requesting a comprehensive Phase II Environmental assessment for as much of the downtown area as can be accomplished. Phase II includes a clean up work plan which needs to be coordinated with the PCA. These steps need to be taken as soon as possible but current landowners also need to cooperate with us to start this clean up. There may be some funding to assist the city for the petroleum clean up. Bruce reported that with petroleum there is 90% contribution from the super fund for clean up, consultant fees and the testing associated with it. We will be going after the Department of Trade and Economic Development Grant, a redevelopment contaminated site clean up grant, for all the big program elements. Bruce stated the DTEC grant is a well funded comprehensive grant. Mark shared a concern that with Beard not willing to do whatever it took to make his agreement work when he already had people interested in investing in the project, how can we get other developers interested. Bruce answered that we have a list of approximately 15 developers that may be interested in our project, which includes some downtown businesses and property owners that have expressed an interest. The City Manager also explained that if more than one developer points out to us that this is not a feasible project, we will need to take another look at the project as it currently stands. This may actually be advantageous to local property owners because of the acquisition costs involved to developers. There will be a packet given out to potential developers. The City has complete survey data and title searches on all downtown properties, what the regulatory constraints are from the MCWD and ponding requirements, etc., The City Manager shared with the group that we need to be very careful not to use information that Beard had previously provided, including his drawings. So if there are any of his drawings still up, they need to be taken down. HOTEL DISTRICT: There has been interest shown from Rick and Sue Bloomquist, and Chris Valerius and Phil Fiske. Chris and Phil were interested because they have to relocate their market and coffee shop and this is the only district that allows for a drive-up window. In her plan, she would incorporate the drive-up coffee shop with the hotel idea. Because there were two local business owners inquiring within a short time frame, it was suggested by Council members to bring them together and suggest a joint project. EDC Minutes 08-17-00 Neither group was interested in a joint endeavor but both are still interested in a project individually. The City Manager explained it is essential we devote our energies on the Auditors Rd. District and the Langdon District, and not pursue the hotel development for at least six months or until the downtown redevelopment is underway. METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PROPERTY: Bruce Chamberlain stated they have indicated an interest, if the referendum passes and the City decides to go forward with acquiring that property, to work with the City to do so. A review appraisal was done of the property which identified the value of the different parcels. MetroPlains has expressed their interest in submitting a concept review plan to the City for just the commercial piece. They had attempted to obtain an extended purchase agreement date with the school district but even though one was not granted in writing, there is a verbal agreement between the two. MetroPlains would like to start some of the approval processes necessary to begin developing the commercial portion of the property. One problem is that this piece of the property overlaps a portion of the ball fields. Because we do not know what will be the outcome of the referendum, we are unsure how to treat that property. Jim Prosser has recommended MetroPlains wait until after the referendum. OPEN SPACE OPEN HOUSE AND REFERENDUM: The City Manager reminded everyone that the referendum will take place on September 12th. With the Council meeting being rescheduled for the following night, it will be on the agenda for the Council to canvass the results. Bob Brown explained that if the voters show an overwhelming desire to purchase the land and spend an additional $2,750,000 for maximum upgrade of the park, it would be pretty difficult for the Council to say no. The City Manager explained that even though almost everyone voted this way at the informational open house that was held, it does not necessarily mean that is how the majority of the citizens will vote. She reported there were approximately 50 people that attended the open house. Jerry Pietrowski stated he felt it was a very well organized event and all the information was available to anyone who had any questions on the referendum. She also explained that it has been a main concern to keep all information neutral, not showing any biases for either side. There will be a follow-up Q and A that will be sent out, addressing questions received at the open house and updating the information in the last Q and A. This should be received within a week of when the referendum will be voted on. The City Manager stated this format will also be used in the future such as when the new utility charge for storm water is established. DOWNTOWN PARKING: Bruce informed the commission there has been a series of mediation meetings with the John's Variety block businesses regarding the parking problem they will have. He stated the joint meeting seemed most productive as they 6 EDC Minutes 08-17-00 looked at different options and started working towards solutions such as on street parking, and the City guaranteeing some of the parking at the Langdon District just south of the tracks. They are also going to be speaking with two property owners in regards to possibly selling their property to be used for parking. There is also the possibility of condemning the property at Uncharted Grounds, but the City doesn't want to do that unless they have to. Bruce explained that costs will be an issue and hopes that it can be divided amongst all parties. The City Manager stated that a comparison was done on how many parking spaces each store felt they needed to how many spaces we know will be available. We were only 16 short of what they stated would be their need and this was taking into account the peak seasons. General consensus was that it was not as big a problem as before, but still needs to be worked on. Mark Brewer asked how the railway acquisition was coming along. Bruce stated he did not believe the petition for abandonment had been filed yet. The railroad is not currently running but we have not had any correspondence from them since early spring. We will continue to monitor this process. BUSINESS RELOCATION REPORT The relocation chart which was passed out shows key businesses in the downtown area that will be affected by the redevelopment and identify potential options to them. The redevelopment completion schedule shows when businesses will be displaced and the current schedule for move-in dates for the districts. The proposed downtown developer information schedule shows the most aggressive possible schedule, but, of course, it is subject to change. Bruce pointed out that in our last meeting it became very apparent of the importance to get the True Value District completed as quickly as possible. He explained that this will allow us to develop a building in front without displacing any business in the back until the new one is up. In order for the new schedule to be successful some element of construction at either Langdon or Auditors may have to occur concurrently. The reason for this is that Scotty B's is not interested in remaining within the True Valu District and if we build a new building in front of his building he will need a place to move into as soon as the new building is ready for occupancy. Bruce went on to say that according to the current schedule both the Langdon District and the Auditors Rd. District should be ready for occupancy approximately in October 2002. The high school site should be ready for occupancy by next November and the Hotel District in the spring of 2002. These schedules will be looked at again once a new developer is found. MetroPlains has shown an interest in being the new developer but they have not actually come in to discuss the possibility. 7 ED(:; Minutes 08-17-00 OTHER BUSINESS: Jerry Pietrowski asked how the project across from OLL church was doing. The City Manager stated that all she knows about that project is that contact has been made with the landowners. This would include the Netka Apartments, Masonic Lodge, two houses, and Williams Store. Bruce pointed out this would be a difficult site to develop because of the wetland setbacks. The developer is interested in building a senior citizen apartment complex for 55 and older. ADJOURN MOTION was made by Bob Brown and seconded by Stan Drahos to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously, The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 a.m. The next meeting will be September 21st. Stan Drahos will be rolls. Respectfully Submitted, Shirley Hawks i¥ 8 MINUTES - EDC - SEPTEMBER 21, 2000 The meeting was called to order by Paul Meisel at approximately 7:15 a.m. Members resent were Stan Drahos, Suzanne Claywell, Paul Meisel, Sharon McMenamy-Cook, Bob Brown, and Mark Brewer. Others present were City Manager Kandis Hanson, Bruce Chamberlain, and Bob Bittle. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The approval of the August 17, 2000, Minutes was deferred until the October 19th meeting due to the packet not being received by the members of the commission. HRA LEVY The City Manager explained that the City should take advantage of the levy that is available through the HRA. This levy will be used to offset some of the redevelopment costs. At the present time the HRA has requested staff to review the possibility of the acquisition of the Longpre property. The HRA will also work with Ken Custer regarding development on his property. PROJECT UPDATES POST OFFICE DEVELOPMENT PROCESR: Bruce Chamberlain reported the purchase price of the United Properties has been approved and we now also own the Willette property. The design plans are being worked out and should be ready to go out for review by the end of the month. Bidding will be done in October and they are hoping to begin construction before winter. There are some variances that still need to be approved by the City before plans can be approved. GREENWAY DEVELOPMENT: There was a discussion of the feasibility of moving the Park and Ride from the Hotel District to the parking lot behind the new Mound Family Hardware. Bruce Chamberlain explained that we should keep as much property as possible for the hotel development and moving the Park and Ride to an already planned parking area would alleviate the potential problem of not enough land for the hotel development. Bruce Chamberlain displayed a site concept plan which showed the exact location of the proposed new area for the Park and Ride. The City Manager stated that in meetings she has attended, one consistent concern brought up is that many cities did EDC Minutes 09-21-00 not plan for enough parking spaces for their Park and Ride lot and run out of parking spaces early on. This new location would give us more parking spaces than if kept in the hotel district. MOTION made by Mark Brewer and seconded by Sharon McMenamy-Cook to recommend the new plan of moving the site for the Park and Ride Development. Questions and concems were brought up by Stan Drahos about the increased traffic on Lynwood Blvd. and what that may do to businesses in that' area.. It was brought up that this may, in fact, increase business as people would be more apt to shop before getting in their cars than they would if they had to make an extra stop. Paul Meisel called for a vote and the motion passed unanimously. REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS FOR AUDITOR'S ROAD DISTRICT AND LANGDON DISTRICT: The City Manager reported that 20 packets were mailed out to interested developers, including three businessmen from the City who are interested in developing their own property. She stated she received several calls from interested developers and staff has narrowed this list down to five, which Staff will continue to meet with. Those still being considered are: 1. MetroPlains 2. Gramercy 3. Ryan 4. CSM 5. Bill Beard. A pre-proposal meeting has been set up for next Wednesday where several business owners are invited to meet with possible developers. It is the hope of the City that this will develop into a two-way dialogue between all parties. Ail EDC members were also invited to attend the meeting as observers. After the meeting, the number of developers will again be narrowed down. The City Manager reminded the EDC that the City is continuing to be on an aggressive schedule and we hope to have a developer in place by the end of the year. There was discussion of whether the Beard Group should be included at the meeting being they pulled out of the preliminary development agreement. It was pointed out that he has a lot of time and money already invested in this project and he did not pull out of the agreement, but it expired and the City decided not to give another extension. EDC Minutes 09-21-00 METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL PROPERTY: Bruce Chamberlain stated he met with MetroPlains and they are proceeding with plans for the entire school site. They will start with the plans for the commercial portion first and then the residential. He stated it will be two to three weeks before they will have the plans to the City. Their residential plan is for medium density housing. Bruce also stated they presently have some anchor businesses for the commercial property. It was the general consensus of the Commission that they prefer the front of the buildings to face the comer of Co. Rd. 110 & 15. There was also a discussion as to the parking area, but Bruce was not sure how that will work out. Bruce also stated the park dedication will be under two acres. Bruce stated the Langdon area will also have medium density housing with six, 12 unit buildings per acre. DOWNTOWN PARKING AND MEDIATION PROCESS: The City Manager stated that all the businesses from the John's Variety block should be responsible for their own parking. The four property owners have met to brainstorm the .parking issue. Staff came up with the idea of possibly purchasing the property where Uncharted Grounds currently is located and using that space for parking. This proposal would make the businesses equal owners and it would be up to them for the upkeep of the parking space. The owner of the Uncharted Grounds property stated they are willing to sell the property and HRA money can be used to help purchase the land. A second proposal was for the City to purchase the land and maintain it as it currently is. This would only enable three more spaces for the businesses. The preferred plan is for the businesses to purchase and maintain the property themselves and tear down the existing building. This will be presented to the HRA on Tuesday. LONGPRE BUILDING: We have been in contact with Jo Longpre regarding acquiring her property. She has stated it would be feasible for her to sell her property at this time. The consensus of the Commission was to recommend purchasing it and possibly use it for parking during the redevelopment phase. CUSTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Kandis Hanson stated Ken Custer would like to redevelop his property. His tentative plans are for a three story building with commercial on the main level and housing above it. He has requested thirty days to develop his plans. 3 EDC Minutes 09-21-00 There was a discussion regarding working exclusively with local businessmen and whether they would keep the design concept a developer would. The City Manager explained that by working with Ken Custer he will keep his business in Mound and we can work with him on his design. DISCUSSION OF PARK AND RIDE: Paul MeiseI pointed out that we already covered this portion of the agenda in the Greenway discussion. He stated that he feels the development is really going forward now and thanked the City Manager and staff for all their hard work. OTHER: Bob Brown asked about redevelopment on the Williams Store property. Bruce Chamberlain explained that the City has no plans for this property right now but there is a developer interested in it. Sharon McMenamy-Cook reported on the Senior Center. She stated the plan cells for a 19,600 square foot building. They still need to raise $300,000. The Commission was enthusiastic about seeing this project start. ADJOURN: MOTION was made by Mark Brewer and seconded by Bob Brown to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 a.m. The next meeting will be October 19, 2000. Sharon will bring rolls. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Hawks 4