86-03-25 CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1986
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. PU~]~I~_HEARI]~G: Delinquent Utility Bills
Pg. 609-611
Set Public Hearing on Beachwood Pond (Suggested
Date: April 15, 1986)
3. Bid Award: Lynwood Blvd. and Tuxedo Blvd. Projects
4..~.~ ~o~-~nne sota ~it i e s/Nati onal Association
~'of Housing and Redevelopment Officials Support of
Tax Increment Financing
Request from Firemen's Relief Association
Comments/Suggestions from Citizens Present
Budget Process - Councilmember Steve Smith
Proclamation on "Building Safety Week"
Payment of Bills
Pg. 612-613
Pg. 614-620
Pg. 621-635
Pg. 636-640
Pg. 641
Pg. 642-650
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. February 1986 Monthly Financial Report as Prepared
by John Norman, Finance Director.
B. Letter to Governor Perpich Requesting Special
Session to Solve Budget Problem.
C. Letter from Citizen Complinenting Police Dept.
Pg. 651-653
Pg. 654-655
Pg. 656
608
Delinquent Water and Sewer 3-19-86
22 232 2301 32
22 232 2355 91
22 232 2370 81
22 235 2401 41
22 238 4854 62
22 238 4856 12
22 238 4875 12
22 238 4879 31
22 238 4898 31
22 238 4933 83
22 238 4957 71
22 238 5005 43
22 238 5020 31
22 238 5120 11
22 241 2185 11
22 244 5019 31
22 259 4949 O1
22 259 4994 64
22 259 5259 31
22 259 5449 O1
22 259 6070 31
22 259 6339 22
22 259 6609 81
22 265 3053 91
22 271 2925 72
$ 64.79
197.83
66.87
119.70
212.70
118.80
209.22
85.78
61.92
224.72
87.26
260.50
66.22
96.82
135.74
145.12
72.85
116.56
33.52
57~72
338.09
243.62
189.94
119.56
164.34
22 277 5853 52
22 280 5846 31
22 280 5883 61
22 283 5925 92
22 286 5915 32
22 286 6056 51
22 292 6016 71
22 292 6033 21
22 295 3186 41
22 298 2965 62
22 304 2926 41
22 304 2939 71
22 307 6177 31
22 31~ 2630 91
22 310 2675 41
22 310 2676 21
22 310 3100 24
22 310 3152 36
22 310 6211 '41
22 313 6216 71
22 324 2611 O1
22 331 6001 52
22 337 5975 82
22 337 6137 41
22 343 2420 63
22 343 2606 O1
22 346 5667 21
$163.11
165.05
140.06
71.04
83.63
137.88
69.09
72.94
76.78
115.83
109.36
126.03
206.90
146.19
109.90
117.76
147.09
71.50
184.68
62.70
175.74
81.17
158.31
114.90
130.82
73.89
94.93
Delinquent Water and Sewer
22 232 2301 32 Thomas Simon Paid $ 64.79
22 232 2355 91 Sandra Hanson '197.83
22,232 237b 81 Fay Cooper ~66487
122 235 2401 41' Zeb Hanson 119.70
22~238 4854 62 Charles Inv. 212.70
22~238 4856 12 Charles Inv. 118.80
22 238 4875 12 Anthony Brinatte Pd $25.00 209.22
'22 238 4879 31 Burr Linquist Paid 85.78
22 238 4898 31 Robert Brose 61.92
22 238 4933 83 E. Maas 224.72
'22 238 4957,7! George Baker 87.26
22 238 5005 43 Frank Mittelsteadt 260.50
22 238 5020 31 Elma Jensen '. 66.22
22 238 51~20.11 Ron O konel P~ $10.OO 96..82
22 241 2185 11 R. Buerger 135.74
22 244 5019 31 Ronald Hayes 145.12
22 259 4949 01 H. Miller Paid .72.85
22 259 4994 64 Pat.ricia Carlson 116.56
22'259 5259 31 T. Grudnowski 33.52
22 259 5449 01 John Venda 57Z72
22 259 6070 31 Perry Ames N.S.F. .338.O9
22 259 6339 22 Doris Ferrill Broke contract243.62
22 259 6609 81 Richard Olexa 189.94
22 265 3053 91 M. Amundson 119.56
22 271 2925 72 Laura Jarnuzek sold 3-25 164.34
Closer will pay city
2301 Fairvlew Lane
2355 Fairview Lane
2370 Fairview Lane
2401 Chateau Lane
4856 Edgewater Dr.
4856 Edgewater Dr.
4875 Edgewater Drive
4879 £dgewater Drive
4898 Edgewater Drive
4933 Edgewater Drive
4957 Edgewater Drive
5005 Edgewater Drive
5020 Edgewater Drive
5120 Edgewater Drive
2185 Pecan Lane
5019 Rosedale Road
4949 Bartlett Blvd.
4994 Bartlett Blvd.
5259 Bartlett Blvd.
5449 Bartlett Blvd.
6070 Bartlett Blvd.
6339 Bartlett Btwd.
6609 Bartlett Bl~d.
3053 Bryant Lane
2925 Holt Lane
22 277 5853 52
22.'280 5846 31
2~ 280 5883 61
22 283 5925 92
22'1286 5915 32
22~ ~6 6056 51
22 292 6016 71
22 292 6033 21
22 295 3186 41
22 298 2965 62
22 304 2926 41
22 304 2939 71
22 307 6177 31
22 310 2630 91
22 310 2675 41
22 310 2676 21
22 310 3100 24"
22 310 3152 36
22 310 6211 41
22 ~13 6216 71
22 324 2611 01
22 331 6001 52
22 337 5975 82'
22 337 6137 41
22 343 2420 63
22 343 2606 01
22 346 5667 21
G M GEnt 165.05
Donald Horner Paid 140.06
H Macnamara Pd $40.00 71.04
Tim Bell 83.63
Jo Etta Roehl 137.88
Randy Lingen 69.09
Todd Warner 72.94
Leo Clifford 76.78
Ron Anderson 115.83
Jay Gorton 109 36
Thomas Helget(Auto Supply) 126.03
Ned Podany 206.90
W.J.L~ng 146.19
Terry Selle 109.90
Robert La Bresh 117~76
Cheryl Tormanen 147.09
Paul Rickenger Paid 71.50
Tim Mehner 184.68
Richard Malnoy 62.70
Doug Eaton Pd $75.0~75.74
Charles Decker 81.17
J. Mittelsteadt 158.31
Tom Lindner Pd 625.OO14.90
Joan Snow 130.82
G.W.Ent 73.89
Robert Brown 94.93
5~ F~i.rfield'. Road
5846 Idlewood Road
5883 Idlewood Road
5925 Ridgewood Road
5917 Hawthorne Road
6056 Hawthorne Road
6016 Cherrywood Road
6033 Cherrywood Road
3186 Priest Lane
2965 Oaklawn Lane
2926 Dicken.s Lane
2939 Dickens Lane
6177 Sinclair Road
2630 Westedge Blvd.
2675 Westedge Blvd.
2676 Westedge Blvd.
3100 Westedge Blvd.
3152 Westedge Blvd.
6211 Westedge Blvd.
6216 Bayridge Road
2611 Setter Circle
6001 Evergreen Road
5975 Beachwood 'Road
6137 Beachwood 'Road
2420 Commerce Blvd.
2606 Commerce Bllvd.
5667 Bush Road'
22 355 5579 01 Tom Helget
.~2 364 2550 62 Gary. Winterfield
22 373 5001 82 Steve Arne
22 385 5062 41 Del Mathison
.22 388 5061 01 R. Giese
22 404 5241 31 Bill Alexander
22 404 5533 11 £entury 21
22 404 5569 72 Bill Alexander
$ 68.03
147.76
Pd $100.oo 248.89
148.99
299.17
139.46
Paid 274.05
110.28
$8134.10
$715o.o7
5579 Auditors Road
2550 Lakewood Lane
5001Woodridge Road
5062 Bayridge Road
5061 Avon Drive
5241 Shoreline Blvd.
5533 Shoreline Blvd.
5569 Shoreline Blvd.
22 355 5579 Oi
22 364 2550 62
22 373 5001 82
22 385 5062 41
22 388 5061 O1
22 404 5241 31
22 404 5533 11
22 404 5569 72
$ 68.03
1 47,76
248.89
148.99
299.1 7
139.46
274.05
110.28
$8134.10
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER IMPROVEMENT OF
BEACHWOOD POND
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, April 15, 1986, at
7:30 P.M., at the Mound City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota,
a public hearing will be held to discuss an improvement to Beachwood
Pond for drainage of Pond to Lake' Langdon.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above
will be heard at this meeting.
Francene C. Clark, City-cl-erk
Lynwood Boulevard-MSAP 145-104-03
and
Safety Improvement
City'.of Mound, Minnesota
Bid Tabulation
March 21, 1986 File #7193 & #3724
B I D PART 1 PART 2
TOTAL
PLANHOLD£R BOND LYNWOOD BLVD TUXEDO BLVD BID
· -, i , I l .... I ;
~lbrecht Company
~408 W. County Rd C.
'~oseville, MN. 55113
~lexander Construction
4561 Johnny CAke Ridge
.oad
.pple Valley, FIN. 5512z
uffalo Bituminous
lacktop Contractors
uffalo,. ,.XLn, 55313
ury & Carlson
008 Wayzata Boulevard
iinneapolis, Mn. 55416
ardrives, Inc.
200 Hemlock Lane N.
iaple Grove, Mn. 55369
ay Bros, Inc.
· 0. Box 12473
T. Paul, Mn. 55112
Lynwood Boulevard-MSAP 145-104-03
and
Safety Improvement
City of Mound, Minnesota
Bid tabulation File #7193 & #3724
March 21, 1986
B ! O PART 1 PAP. T 2 TOTAL
'LANHOLDER BOND LYNWOOD BLVD TUXEDO BLVD BID
und Asphalt Const-. Co~
214 Butternut Circle
riot Lake, MN. 55372
idwest Asphalt
· 0- ~ox ~ :o '>~, ~'/r,~
opkins,MN. 55343 ~ 7Z7 ~ ?f5 ~ /~, ~O
referred Paving', 'Inc.
pencer Construction
701 79th Avenue N
rooklyn Park, HN
5445
alley Paving Inc.
D50-D Highway 101
.~akopee, MN. 55379 ~
Ldmer, Inc.
. O. Box 218
pring Park, ~. 55384
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS M LAND SURVEYORS ~ PLANNERS
March 25, 1986
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
Honorable Mayor &
Members of the City Council
City of Mound
534i Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
SUB3ECT:
Lynwood Boulevard
MSAP 145-104-03
Tuxedo Boulevard
MSAR 145-101-05
MKA File #7193 & #3724
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
Enclosed is a tabulation of the bids received last Friday for the above
projects. The low bidder was Rreferred Raving, Inc. of Waconia, with a total
bid of $200,575.85 for both projects. Of this total, $182,132.35 is for the
Lynwood Boulevard project, and $18,443.50 for the Tuxedo Boulevard Safety
Improvement. The Engineer's Estimate for the combined bid was $219,355.00,
with $203,900.00 estimated for Lynwood Boulevard and $15,455.00 for Tuxedo
Boulevard. As you can see, we received very good bids. We have been Engineers
on previous projects in which Preferred Ravings, Inc., has been the Contractor
and have been satisfied with their performance; therefore, we would recommend
that the City award them the contract.
If the Council should have any questions on either of these projects, we
would be pleased to answer them.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
OC: jmj
Enclosures
F' RO .TIE C T" '7 ]_93
CITY OF MOUND -- LYNWOOD
TUXEDO BLVD
-- STREET
IMP =
PART 1-MSAF' 145-104-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVARD
ENC,INEER: McCOMBS-KNUT~ON
PAGE 1
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
ENG. ESTIMATE PREFERRED PAVING BUFFALO BIl'~i~Ol~
UN I T TO TAL L~ I T TO TAL UN I T ll]TAL
8081.501 MOBILIZATION LS
8101.5!1 C & C- ROADWAY LS
~lO-~:soi eLDC,, REMOWL----~S- 1. o
8104.501 REM. ST.S.PIF'E LF 870.0
8104.501 REMOVE CON. C~G LF 160.0
2104.sO'Ei-~Mov_? ~'I~EW~Eq- SF 1,670. o
8104.509 REMOUE MH OR CB EA 4.0
8104.509 R£MDtE WALLS LS
8104.583 SALVAGE CASTING EA
1.0 80000.00 80,000.00 8500.00 8,500.00 8500.00 8,500.00
1.0 3500.00 3,500.00 SO0.O0 500.00 500.00 500.00
45000.00 45,000.00 28500.00 88,500.00 40000.00 40,000.00
4.00 3,480.00 6.00 5,880.00 8.00 G,B(~O. O0
3.00 480.00 1.00 160.00 8.50 400.00
0.50 85~.00 0.35 584.50 0.50 B3S.O0
850.00 1,000.00 175.00 700.00 800.00 BO0. O0
1000.00 1,000.00 2500.00 8,500.00 500.00 500.00
8.0 50.00 100.00 75.00 150.00 85.00 50.00
10 8104..E~?.3 SALVAGE L.PDLE EA 1.0
11 8105.501 COMMON EXCAV. CY 8,750.0
100.00 100.00 110.00 110.00 850.00 ~0.00
3.00 8,850.00 4.00 11,000.00 4.50 18,375.00
1P 8105.583 COMMON BORROW CY !,SO0.O 4.50
13 810~3.585 TOPSOIL BORROW CY 830.0 6.00
14 8130.50! WATER GA 88.0 15.00
15 8811.S01AGG. BASE CL.8 ll~ 45.0 1P.O0
16 8811.501 AGG. BASE CL.S TN 1,S~0.0 8.50
17 8~1.504 BIT MAT FOE MIX TN 85.0 230.00
18 ~:,:.I.514 BASE COURSE MIX TN 585.0 13.00
lB 8341.504 BIT MAT FOR MIX TN 81.0 830.00
80 8341.508 WEAR COURSE MIX TN 390.0 15.00
6,750.00 G.SO 9,750.00 4.50 6,750.00
1,380.00 6.00 1,380.00 ?.00 1,610.00
480.00 1.50 42.00 10.00 880.00
540.00 12.00 540.00 15.00 675.00
11,560.00 B. O0 10,880.00 8.00 10,880.00
5,750.00 165.00 4,185.00 170.00 4,~50.00
6,88E.00 13.80 7,845.00 12.50 6,~8.50
4,830.00 165.00 3,465.00 170.00 3,570.00
S,(~SO. O0 17.00 6,630.00 13.50 5,865.00
81 8357.508 BIT MAT - TACK
88 8~8.501 BIT MAT - PRIME
83 8503.511 18" RCP ST.CL.5
84 8502:.511 15" RCP ST CL.S
85 2503.511 18" RCP ST.CL.?
86 85¢3.511 84" RCF' ST.CL.3
87 8503.511 87' RCP ST.CL.8
88 8503.511 30' RCP ST.CL.8
89 8503.573 30" RCP C.APRON
30 85~.506 DESIGN SF'EC.
GA 185.0 8.00 850.00 1.50 187.50 1.00 ~.00
GA ~0.0 0.30 885.00 1.50 1,185.00 1.50 1,185.00
LF 10~5.0 18.00 1,908.00 80.70 8,1!)4.8b 80.00 8,~0.00
LF 63.0 80.00 1,860.00 81.85 1,376.55 81.00 1,~3.00
LF 88.0 28.00 1,936.00 84.40 8,147.80 28.00 1,95~.00
LF 880.0 87.00 7,560.00 89.90 8,378.00 85.00 7,000.0~
LF 485.0 30.00 18,750.00 36.00 15,300.00 87.50 11,687.50
LF 35.0 50.00 1,750.00 40.00 1,400.00 30.00 1,050.00
EA 1.0 1000.00 1,000.00 1100.00 1,100.00 750.00 750.00
LF 19.6 140.00 8,744.00 170.00 3,338.00 100.00 1,EH50.O0
CITY OF MOUND -- LYNWOOD
o
PART i-MSAF' i45-i04-03-LYNW00D BOUL£VARD
TUXEDO BLUD
-- STREET
IHP.
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
EN~. ESTIMATE PREFEREED PAVIN~
UN ! T TO TAL LIN I T TO TAL
BUFF~L0 .STll.~ ~US
UN IT TOTAL
31 250G.~0'/_ . NH/CB._ ....~,:nrqTr~, F LF 9.4
5~ 8506.507 MH/CB DESIGN C LF
~ ~506.516 ~ASTI~G ASSSM.A EA- ~.0
34 ~S~.SI6 CASTING ASSEH.B EA 4.0
~ ~5~.5~6 CASTING ASSEH.C EA 1.0
37 ~506.5~2 ADJ.FRA~E~RING EA
38 ~5i1.50E RIP ~F' CY 6.6
~ ~Sll.5ii G~NIAR ?ILTER CY 3.3
40 B~I.SO1 4" CDNC. WALK SF 4,580.0
41 B~i. SO1 C&G DESIGN ~iB LF 1,600.0
4~ ~5~i~5~7 ~K';' 'AF'RDNS ....... ~y i40.0
43 ~545.5i! INSTALL L.F'DLE EA i.O
44 ~5.515 LGT.BAS[~ DES.E EA
45 ~5.5~1 3-1/~" CDNDUIf ~F .... 4~.0~
46 ~5.553 PIL ~XES EA ~.0
47 ~STI.SO~T~ES - ~APLE TR 4.0
48 ~57i.50~ TREES - ASH TR
160.00 1,504.00 170.00 1,EgB.O0
__ 170. O0 986. O0 170. O0 986. O0
100. O0 940. O0
100. O0 580. O0
.1.50. O0 300. O0 225. O0 450. O0 200. O0
800.00 BO0. O0 285.00 900.00 210.00
170.00 170.00 2?5.00 825.00 800.00
400.00
840.00
200.00
70.00 630.00 60.00 540.00 50.00 450.00
30.00 870.00 70.00 630.00 /25.00 1,125.00
50.00 330.00 40.00 864.00 30.00 198.00
30.00 99.00 18.00 59.40 lP.00 39.60
1.50 6,870.00 1.40 6,412.00 1.30 5,~4.00
5.80 B,~O. O0 5.85 9,360.00 6.00 9,600.00
88.00 3,080.00 20.00 8,BO0. O0 83.00
800.00 800.00 110.00 110.00 550.00
550.00 550.00 580.00 580.00 650.00
10.00 400.00 11.75 470.00 4.P.5
550.00 1,100.00 700.00 1,400.00 27~.00
150,00 600.00 75.00 300.00 1.%0.00
4.0 150.00
600.00 ?5.00 300.00 150.00
3,880.00
550.00
650.00
170.00
550.00
600.00
600.00
C · IDt' v
49 8571.502 TP£E_~-HACK..~RR, TR 4.0 150.00
__50_8575.50! ROADSIDE SEED AC 0.3 500.00
S1 8575.508 SEED MIXTUP£ S LB 15.0 ~,~.00
52 25?5.505 SD,D~h,~ SY 1,000.0 1.SO
53 P5~.511 MLLCH MAT TYF'Et TN 0.6 1BO. O0
54 SP CONCRETE STEPS El 80.0 85.00
55 ~F' DRY,°"o°,~.~.~ MASON WALL SF 1,420.0 7.00
.__5_6 ~P F&I 6' DIP WATERJqAIN LF _~.0 .... ~_!5.00
5? ~P F&I DIP FITTINGS LB 260.0 8.00
58 SP F&I 1-1/8" CDPF'ER SER LF 30.0 B. O0
60 ~' F~I I-1m" CURE
.'- ~T~.~ EA
600.00 75.00 300.00 800.00
150.00 1500.00 450.00 600.00
BO0. O0
180.00
45.00 8.30 ~.50 5.00 75.00
1,500.00 1.70 1,700.00 1.50 1,500.00
lOB.O0 300.00 1BO.O0 300.00 IBO. O0
SO0.O0 115.00 8,300.00 ?5.00
9,940.00 7.90 11,818.00 10.00
585.00 80.70 784.50 80.00
1,500.00
14,800.00
700.00
520.00 1.50 390.00 2.00 520.00
840.00 17.00 SlO.O0 14.00
40.00 1/5.00 ]l~.O0 100.00
70.00 115.00 115.00 100.00
480.00
100.00
100.00
PROSECT: ?~93
CITY OF HOUND
-- LYNW,OOD & TUXEDO BLUD -- STREET IMP.
---~-~-MS~' ~5-104-03,-LYNWDOD BOULEVAP~
PAGE 3
ENGINEER: McCOMBS-KNUTSDN
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
ENG. ESTIMATE
lin I T TO TAL
PREFERRED PAVING
TOTAL
BUFFALO BITL~I~OUS
UNIT TOTAL
G1 SF' F&i G' GATE VALVE EA 1.0 350.00
____62 SF2_ADJUST EXISTING G.V. EA 1.0 150.00
63 ~' ADJUST EXIST CURB BOX EA 8.0 60.00
F~4 ~ RELOCATE HYD. & G.V. EA 1.0 BO0.O0
65 ~ F~! 8' _~VC .~,__SEWER LF 40.0 15.00
~I~, SEW, SEEV. LF 40,0 1~,00
67 SP ADJ, EXIST, M,H,/C,B, EA 4,0 800,00
68 SF' R~ON~TRU~T EXIST MH EA 1.0 300.00
6B ~ F&I SIGN POSTS EA 4.0 85.00
70 ~ F~I R2-1 SIGNS EA B.O 30.00
71 ~P F&I R7-1 SIGNS EA 8.0 30.00
:~0.00 400.00 400.00
1SO.O0 ~.00 85.00
400.00 400.00
125.00 1PS.DO
.120.00 50.00 100.00
BO0. O0 650.00 650.00
GO0. O0 19.00 760.00
$0.00 100.00
BO0. O0 800.00
1~.00 520.00
480.00 16.00 640.00
800.00 100.00 400.00
300.00 500.00 500.00
100.00 BO. O0 380.00
60.00 100.00 800.00
60.00 100.00 EO0. O0
17.00 680.00
125.00 500.00
BO0.O0 BO0. O0
8S.00 100.00
~S. O0 70.00
3S. O0 70.00
TOTAL PART 1-MSAF' 14S-104-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVAED
203,900.00 188,138.35 185,195.~0
:. F'RECAST REIATM '" WALL
1G,2~:O. O0 18.00 17,040.00 18.00
17,040. C'
CITY OF 190UND -- LYNWOOD
PART 1-MSAF' 14S-104-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVARD
TUXEDO
BL VD
-- STREET
TMP.
ITEM U~tT Q~NT I19'
ENG. E STIflAI~E
UNIT ll]TAL
VALLEY PAVING
L~ I T TO TAL
PAGE 4
BURY RNO CARLSON
TOTAL
1 8oBi. SOl MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 80000.00
~ ~_ioi. Sli c ~ ~ ROA0~Av.. Ls ...... ~i.o .... sso0. o0
3 ~103.501 ~DG. ~MOVAL LS 1.0 45000.00
4 BlO4.S01 ~M. ST.S.PIPE LF 870.0 4.00
6 8104.503 REMOVE SIDEWALK SF 1,~v.O O.SO
~ 8104.S09 ~MOVE MH OR CB EA 4.0 8S0.00
8 ~104.S~ ~MOVE W~_,~___ LS 1.0 1000.00
~ ~1~.B23 ~LVAGE CASTING EA 8.0
10 B104.~83 SALVAGE L.POLE EA 1.0
11 8l~..SO! COMMON EXCAV.~CY
13 81~.S85 TOPSOI_ BORROW CY 830.0
14 2130.50! WATER GA 88.0
~ 8811.501 AGG. BASE CL.B TN 45.0
1~ 8811.501 AGG. ~SE CL.S TN 1~0.0
17 8~:1.504 BIT MAT FO~ MIX TN 8~.0
18 8~,_.1.S14 BASE COURSE MIX TN
19 8341.504 BIT ' ~ ~OR M~v
MA ...... TN 8!.0
80 8341.508 ~AR rn:;~or MIX TN 390.0
81 8~7.S0~ BIT MAT - TACK GA ~S.O
88 83S9.S01 BIT ~AT - PRIME GA ~0.0
83 8S03, SiI ~ RCP ST.CL.S LF
~4 8S03.Sii 15" ECP ST CL.S
85 ~c~, q~ 18"
~-~' ..... · ECF' El. CL.3
86 8502~. 511
87 8503.511
88 8503.511
88 8503. S73
30 8506. 506
80,000.00 6500.00 6,500.00 6100.00 6,100.00
3,500.00 8500.00 8,500.00 300.00 300.00
45,000.00 84400.00 84,400.00 28450.00 88,450.00
3,480.00 8.50 7,995.00 8.40 7,908.00
480.00 4.00 640.00 3.00 480.00
835.00 O. BO 1,[<~c. O0 0.10 167.00
1,000.00 285.00 1,300.00 315.00 1,860.00
__1,000.00 3500.00 3,500.00 475.00 475.0C'
50.00 100.00 7S. O0 /50.00 79.00 /58.00
100.00 100.00 105.00 105.00 100.00 100.00
3.00 B,850.00 3.90 10,7'85.00 4.3~ 11,885.00
4.50 6,750.00 5.50 8,850.00 4.90 7,L:60.00
6.00 1,380.00 6.50 1,495.00 6.30 1,449.00
15.00 480.00 10.00 880.00 15.00 480.00
18.00 540.00 10.00 450.00 86.00 1,170.00
8.50 11,560.00 B.60 11,696.00 9.90 1~,464.00
830.00 5,750.00 168.00 4,B00.00 198.00 4,9S0,00
!?.00 6,885.00 15.00 7,875.00 17.12~ 9,371.85
830.00 4,82:0.00 168.00 3,588.00 198.00 4,158.00
15.00 5,850.00 16.50 6,42~.00 83.80 9,888.00
8.00 850.00 1.85 15~5.85 3.00
0.30 885.00 1.30 975.00 1.70
1B. O0 1,908.00 80.00 8,120J00 80.00
LF 63.0 80.00 1,860.00
LF 88.0 88.00 1,92:6.00
~4" ECP ST.CL.3 LF_ 880,0 87.00 7,~60.00
87' RCF' ST.CL.8 LF 485.0 ...... 20:00'-- 18,750.00
30" RCF' ET.CL. 8 LF 35.0 50. O0 1,750. O0
30". R~.F C.AFR~h _EA ........ !,_0___~00~..09- _3~000.00
DESIGN SPEC. LF 19.6 140.00 8,744.00
81.00 1,383.00 80.50
88.00 1,9~.00 88.00
87.00 7,560.00 86.00
375. O0
1,875. O0
8,180.00
1,891.50
1,936.00
7,880.00
89.00 18,~5.00 88.00 11,900.00
40.00 1,400.00 31.50 1,102.50
850.00 BSO. O0 760.00 760.00
100.00 1,960.00 100.00 1,960.00
PROJECT: ?i93
CITY OF HOUND
LYNWOOD
& TUXEDO
BL ~
-- STREET
IMP.
PART 1-MSAP 145-i04-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVARD
.__E_N~!NEE ~_._~ ¢~COMBS-KN UT80N
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY
ENG. ESTIflATE
UNIT TOTAL
~AqLLEY PAUING
UNIT TOTAL
PAGE 5
BURY Al, lO
UNIT : :' ~TAJ..
31 8506.S07 MH/CB DESIGN F LF 9.4
38 2506.S07 MH/CB DESIGN C LF 5.8
~ 8506.5!6 CASTING ASSEM.A EA 8.0
~ 85~.516 CASTING ASSEM.B SA 4.0
_L~Fp_.8_5~.5_!~_C_ASTIN~G A__S_S'EM_.C EA i. 0
~ 8506.521 INSTALL CASTING EA 9.0
37 85~.528 ADJ.FRAME&RI,~;G EA 9.0
3_B.?_-q11.505 RIP RAP CY 6.6,
39 2511.511 G~ANULAR FILTER CY
40 8581.501 4' CONC. WALK SF 4,580.0
41 8531.501 C~G DESIGN B~18 LF 1,600.0
48 8531.507 6" AF'RO~S SY 140.0
43 8545.511 INS, TALL L.F'OLE EA 1.0
44 8545.512 ~ oAor, DES.E
L~T .... ..~_ EA 1.0
4S 8545.~! 3-1/8' CONDUIT LF 40.0
46 2545.553 PULL BOXES EA 8.0
47 2571.508 TREES - M~F'LE TR 4.0
48 8571.508 TREES - ASH TR 4.0
49 8571.508 TREES-HACKBEREY TR 4.0
50 8575.501 ROADSIDE SEED AC O.E:
51 8575.508 SEED MIXTURE S LB 15.0
52 25~.505 SODDING SY 1,000.0
___-5~_~_8S75.511 MULCH MAT TYPE1 TN 0.6
54 ~' CONCRETE STEPS RI 20.0
55 8P DRY RL~BBLE MASOn! WALL SF 1,480.0
._~.8F' F~I 6" DIP WATER~AI)'~ LF S~.O
57 SP F&I DIP FITTINGS LB 860.0. ....
S8 SF' F~I 1-1/8' COPPER SER LF 30.0
__S9 ~__ F&I 1-1/8' COP~'m COCK E~ 1.0
60 SP F&! i-i/B" CUP~ STOP EA 1.0
160.00 1,504.00 100.00 940.00
170.00 986.00 100.00 580.00
150.00 300.00 885.00 4S0.00
800.00 800.00 830.00 820.00
170.00 170.00 885.00 28S.00
70.00 630.00 65.00 5~.00
30.00 870.00 100.00 900.00
50.00 ~Z.O. O0 30.00 198.00
100.00
100.00
210. O0
880.00
810. O0
53.00
125.00
81.00
940. O0
580. OC'
480.00
BO0. O0
810.00
477. O0
125. O0
138.60
85.00 SO0. O0 BS.O0 1,700.00 84.00 1,680.00
7.00 9,940.00 8.90 12,62:8.00 7.80 10,884.00
.15.00 525.00 85.00 BTS.O0 81.00 735.00
8.00 520.00 8.50 650.00 1.85 491.00
8.00 240.00 15.00 450.00 14.00 420.00
40.00 40.00 125.00 125.00 105.00 105.00
70.00 70.00 100.00 100.00 80.00 80.00
10.00 400.00 11.00 440.00 10. B0 43~.00
550.00 1,100.00 715.00 1,430.00 695.00 1,370.00
150.00 600.00 ~00.00 BO0. O0 147.00 5BB. O0
150.00 600.00 190.00 760.00 105.00 420.00
150.00 600.00 800.00 BO0.O0 105.00 480.00
S00.00 150.00 450.00 135.00 315.00 94.50
3.00 45.00 5.00 75.00 4.00 60.00
1.50 1,500.00 1.70 1,700.00 2.40 2,400.00
1BO.O0 lOB. O0 450.00 270.00 385.00 831.00
30.00 99.00 15.00 49.50 12.00 39.60
1.50 6,970.00 1.70 7,796.00 1.37 6,874.60
5.80 B,~O. O0 4.70 7,52.0.00 4.73 7,~8.00
88.00 3,080.00 86.00 3,640.00 85.00 3,500.00
800.00 800.00 105.00 105.00 100.00 100.00
SS0.00 550.00 490.00 480.00 475.00 475.00
PROJECT: 7193
CITY OF MOUND
-- LYNWOOD & TUXEDO BLVD -- STREET IMP.
PART 1-iiSAF' 145-.1.04-03-LYN~OD BOULEVARI)
ENG INE_E R:_~cCOHBS-KNUTSDN
PAGE 6
ENG. ESTIHATE
ITEM L~IT OUANTITY I~IT TOTAL
UALLEY PAVING
LI, iIT TOTAL
BURY AND CM~I.I~)N
UNIT ~FDTAL
61 ~' F&I 6" GATE VALUE EA 1.0 350.00 ~.~_0.00
68 SF' AnTUc~ e ~.
EX!~TIN~ ~ V EA 1.0 150.00 150.00
63 SP ADSUST EXIST CURB BOX EA 8.0 60.00 180.00
64 SP RELOCATE HYD. & G.U. EA 1.0 BO0. O0 BO0.O0
__65.? F~ B" PUC SAN. SEWER ~F 40.0 15.00 600.00
66 ~' F&I 6" CISF' SEW.SEE'.'. LF 4~.0 18.00 480.00
67 SP ADJ. EXIST. M.H./C.B, EA 4.0 800.00 BO0.O0
68 ~' RECONSTRUCT EXIST flH EA 1.0 300.0? 300.00
69 S~ F&I SIGN POSTS EA 4.0 85.00 100.00
70 ~ F~I P~-i SIGNS EA 8.0 30.00 60.00
71 SP F&!._~7~ ~IONS EA 8.0 30.00 60.00
450.00 450.00 480.00 480.00
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
185.00 850.00 100.00 EO0. O0
900.00 900.00 ~.00 ~.00
15.00 600.00 lP.SO SO0. O0
19.00 760.00 17.00 680.00
185.00 500.00 150.00 600.00
950.00 950.00 940.00 940.00
30.00 lPO. O0 B6. O0 104.00
40.00 80.00 39.00 7B. O0
80.00 40.00 16.00 ~.00
TOTAL PART_I_-MSAF'_~I~S-IO4_:_O3-~_Y_N.WgOD BOULEVARD 803,900.00 i~,~i.~S 194,994.55
16, ~-:30. A, ,- r~
-- 16 82:,42:0.00 11.80
15,904. O0
PROJECT.' 7'193
CITY DF MOUND -- LYNWOOD & TUXEDO BLUD -- STREET IMP.
PART 1-MSAP 145-104-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVARD
ENG INEE?,: McCOMBS-~UT~N
ENO. ESTIMATE HA~RIVE$, INC.
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
PAGE 7
TOTAL
1 8081.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 80000.00 80,000.00 14975.00 14,975.00 74843.00 7,489.00
. ~ ~___~S
8 8101.511C ~ G ROA~.W~ 1.0 ~¢0.00 3,500.00 750.00 750.00 450.00 450.00
3 8103.501 ~.DG. REMOVAL LS 1.0 45000.00 45,000.00 80000.00 80,000.00 87500.00 87,500.00
4 8104.501 REM. ST.S.F'IF'E LF 870.0 4.00 3,480.00 6.60 5,748.00 6. S0 S,E~3S.O0
5 8104.~01 REMOVE~ON. C~G LF 1GO. O 3.00 480.00 8.00 380.00 ~.~K) ~0.00
6 8104.503 or~nu~,~:_,~ SIDEWALK SF 1,670.0 0.50 895.00 0.70 1,169.00 O.BO 8:35.00
7 2104.509 REMOVE MH OR CB EA 4.0 850.00 1,000.00 880.00 BBO. O0 885.00 900.00
B 8104.509 REMOVE WALLS LS 1.0 I000.00 1,000.00 1000.00 1,000.00 8600.00 8,600.00
9 8104.583 SALVAGE CASTING EA 8.0 SO. O0 I00.00 SO. O0 100.00 ~.00 100.00
10 8104.583 SALVAGE L.POLE EA 1.0 100.00 100.00 105.00 105.00 490,00 490.00
11 8105.501 COMMON EXCAV. CY 8,750.0 3.00 B,BBO. O0 4.40 18,100.00 4.50 18,375.00
0 4.50 6,750.00 5.80 8,700.00 S. O0 7,500.00
0 6.00 1,3B0.00 9.00 8,070.00 5.50 1,865.00
0 15.00 480.00 10.00 880.00 30.00 840.00
18 8105.583 COMMON BORROW CY 1,500.
13 81~.525 TOPSOIL BORROW C~ 830.
14 8130.501 WATER ~A 88.
15 8811.501 AGG. B~-3E-~-- TN-- 45.
16 881i.5oi ACC. BASE CL.S TN 1,360.
17 8~1.504 BIT MAT FOR MIX TN 85.
0 18.00 5~0.00 10.00 450.00 7.50 337.50
0 B.SO 11,~0.00 8.00 lO, BBO.O0 7.50 10,800.00
0 830.00 5,750.00 160.00 4,000.00 1~.00 4,875.00
lB 8331.514 BASE COURSE MIX TN
19 8341.504 BIT MAT FOR MIX TN
80 2341.508 WEAR ~.~.UR~,E Ml¥ Ti'!
81 8S~7.508 BIT MAT - TACK GA
88 8S~SB.50! BIT MA.T - PRIME GA
83 8503.511 18" RCP ST.CL.5 LF
84 850.'..511 1_ ,.,.F ~ _ LF
PS 8S03.51! I~" P. CP ST.CL.E: LF
86 8one'~~ ..~11 24" R~F ST.CL.3 '.~r
87 ~503,511 87" RCP ST,CL,2 LF
8B 8502:,511 30" RCF' ST,CL,P LF
89 8503.573. 30" R. CF' C.AF'RDN EA
30 8506.506 DESIGN SF'EC. LF
525.0 13.00 6,885.00 13.90 7,897.50 19.75 10,368.75
81.0 830.00 4,82:0.00 1GO. O0 3,2:60.00 195.00 4,095.00
E~O.O 15.00 S,8BO. O0 13.90 5,48!.00 81.00 8,190.00
185.0 8.00 850.00 1.85 ~6.85 3.00 375.00
750.0 0.30 885.00 1.50 1,185.00 1.00 7'30.00
106.0 18.00 1,908.00 83.00 8,438.00 88.85 8,3SB.SO
63.0 20.00 1,860.00 86.00 1,63B.00 84.38 1,5E~.94
88.0 88.00 1,936.00 89.00 8,558.00 87.56 8,485.88
88~.0 8,.vO 7,560.00 30.00 8,400.00 88.65 8,088.00
'-' 486.o- oo 31. oo 13,175. oo 87.68 n,Ts4.oo
~.0 50.00 1,750.00 3~ ~0 1,860.00 34.98 1,884.30
1.0 1000.00 1,000.00 1000.00 1,000.00 954.00 ~r-~4.00
19.6 140.00 8,744.00 110.00 8,156.00 106.00 8,077.60
PROJECT: 7193
CITY OF HOUND -- LYNWOOD (k TUXEDO BLVD
PART 1-HSAF' 145-104-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVARD
ENGINEER: McCOMBS-~UTSDN
STREET IMP,
PA~E 8
ENB. ESTIMATE
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL
HAP, DRIVES, INC. MIDkEST ~T
UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
31 5506.507 MH.:CB DESIGN F LF
L38~85__06.507 MH,'~B DE..uN
~ 85~.516 CASTING AS~M.A EA
~ ~5~.~16 CASTING AS~M.B EA
~ ~5~.516__~6.STIN~6~.~M.C EA
9.4 160.00 1,504.00 110.00 1,034.00 106.00 996.4~
5.8 170.00 986.00 110.00 638.00 106.00 614.80
8.0 150.00 300.00 820.00 440.00 812.00 484.00
4.0 800.00 800.00 880.00 BBO. O0 81P.O0 548.00
1.0 170.00 170.00 820.00 880.00 812.00 812.00
8506.581 INSTALL CASTING EA 9.0 70.CS
8506.528 ADJ.FRAHE&EING EA 9.0 30.00
851~505~!~;._RJF' CY __6.6 50.00
630.00 o~.,. O0 747.00 79.50 715.50
570.00 150.00 1,~0.00 1.59.00 1,431.00
330.00 S~.O0 857.40 37.10 844.86
39 8511.511 GRANULAR FILTER CY 3.3 30.00
40 8521.501 4' CONS. WALK SF 4,550.0 1.50
41.8531~50~ C&~ DESI~N_.B6._A~_LF 1,600.0 5.80
48 852:1.507 G" AF'EONS SY 140.0 28.00
43 8545.511 INSTALL L.F'DLE EA 1.0 800.00
44 ~5.51~S L~I~BASE, DES, E_EA_ 1.0 550.00
45 8545.581 3-1/B" CONDUIT LF 40.0 10.00
~ 8s~s.ss3 ~ULL BOXES £A ~.0 550.00
47 8571.508 TEEES - MAPL£ TR 4.0 1SO. O0
99.00 17.00 56.10 ).5.90 52.47
6,870.00 1.40 5,412.00 1.40 6,412.00
B,S~20. O0 6.00 9,600.00 S.90 9,440.00
3,080.00 85.00 3,500.00 84.80 3,388.00
800.00 105.00 105.00 850.00 850.00
550.00 500.00 500.00 4~.00 475.00
400.00 11.00 440.00 15.75 630.00
1,100.00 715.00 1,430.00 750,00 l,SO0. O0
600.00 800.00 800.00 885.00 BO0~O0
45 ,.S,i.50P TREES - ASH TR 4.0 1SO. O0
49 8571.508 TREES-HACFJ~ERP. Y TR 4.0 1SO. O0
50 8575.501 ROADS!DE SEED AC 0.3 500.00
51 8~T5.BOP SEED MIXTURE 5 LB l~.O 3.00
sm ~s75.sos SODDIN~ SY 1,ooo.o 1.so
~3 8575.511 MULCH MAT TYPE1 TN O.G 1BO.O0
54 SP CONCRETE .-~.~F~ RI 80.0 85.00
7.00
15. O0
55 SP DRY RUBBI_E MASON WA,.. SF 1,480.0
56 SP F8~I 6" DIP WATERMAIN LF 35.0
----~--~i~--F-I~I DIP ~-iTTiNCs ZB- 2~TO B.O0
58 ~' F&I 1-1/8' COPPER SER LF 30.0 B. O0
5~ ~ F&I 1-I/8' CO~'. COCK EA 1.0 40.00
60 ~' FM l-l/8" CUP.~ STOP EA ~.0
600.00 190.00 760.00 165.00 660.00
600.00 800.00 BO0.O0 BBO.O0 BBO,O0
150.00 330.00 99.00 1650.00 495.00
45.00 4.00 60.00 5.00 75.00
1,500.00 1.75 1,750.00 8.85 8,850.00
108.00 400.00 840.00 300.00 IBO.O0
500.00 83.00 1,660.00 1.85.00 8,500.00
9,940.00 9.00 12,780.00 7.85 11,147.00
585.00 ~.00 1,885.00 ~:.BO 1,183.00
520.00 4.50 1,170.00 4.84 1,108.40
840.00 30.00 900.00 88.62 858.60
40.00 140.00 140.00 138.50 138.50
70.00 890.00 890.00 875.00 875.0~
CITY OF HOUND --LYNWOOD
TUXEDO BI_VD
-- STREET
PART 1-MSAF' 145-104-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVARD
_E_NG I~N_E~.~; _M__c_COMBS-~UTSON
ENG. ESTIMATE
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL
HARI)RI~S, INC.
UNIT TOTAL
PAGE 9
MIDWEST I~SPH~LT
UNIT TOTAl.
G1 SF' F&I 6" GATE VALVE EA 1.0 3S0.00 3S0.00 440.00 440.00
68 8P ADJUST EXISTING G.V. EA 1.0 150.00 150.00 18S.00 185.00
E~3 ~8 ADJUST EXIST CURB ~X EA 8.0 60.00 180.00 100.00 800.00
64 9' RELOCATE HYD. & G.V. EA 1.0 800.00 800.00 1~0.00 1,~0.00
¢~5 ~P F&I B" PVC SAN. SEWER LF 40.0 15.00 600,00 43.00 1,7'80,00
66 5? F&! 6"-~'i'sF"SE~-.S~Rv. LF 40.0 12.00 480.00 31.00 1,840.00
67 9' ADJ. EXIST. M.H./C.B. EA 4.0 800.00 800.00 190.00 760.00
6g SP RECONSTRUCT EXIST MH EA 1.0 300.00 300.00 600.00 600.00
69 SP F&I SIGN POSTS ..... EA 4.0 85.00 100.00 50.00 800.00
70 ~P F&I RS-1 SIGNS EA 8.0 30.00 60.00 150.00 300.00
71 ~P F&I RT-1 SIGt;S EA P,O 30,00 60.00 1'75.00 3SO.O0
484. O0 4P4.00
138.50 1~2.50
95.50 191. O0
1875.00 1,BTS. O0
41.80 1,648.00
89.68 1,187.80
185. O0 74 O. O0
585. O0 585. O0
P...~. O0 100. O0
liS. O0 170. O0
~5. O0 1~0. O0
TOTAL PART 1-MSAP !45-104-03-LYNWOOD BOULEVAR!?
803,900. O0 191,068.85 194,787.10
~. F'RECAST ~f'TA~_~:'?~_ ?.LL SF 1420 fl,SO
16, E:3O. 00 13.80 19,5~. O0
18.50 17,750.00
~-RO SECT: 7193
:ITY OF HOUND -- LYNWOOD
TUXEDO
BL VD
-- STREET
:'ART B-MSAP 145-101-03-TUXEDO BOULEVARD
PAGE I
_E~N_G !_~}~_E _R; M_~cCOMB?~KNUTSON
ITEM IJNIT QUANTITY
1 8101.513 CEG RT OF WAY LS 1.0
3 B104.501 REM. BlT. CURB, LF 180.0
~OM.,uN EXCAV. CY 15.0
4 8103.501 '
5 8103.522: COMMON BORROW __ ~Y __400.0
6 8105.5BS TOPSOIL BORROU C¥ 70.0
7 8331.504 BIT MAT FOF MIX TN 1.6
8 8331.514 BASE COUP. SE MIX T~ 35.0
.... 9 83~1.504 BIT MAT FOR MIX ~N 0.6
10 87,41.508 WEAR COURSE MIX .TN 10.0
11 B~7.508 BIT MAT - TACK GAL 5.0
~-~.sll 18" RCP ~T,CL~5 LF-- 5.0
13 BSOE.509 MH/CB DES!G~-'. H
14 ~506.516 CAST
lq B535.501 BITL~INOUS CURB,
16 B554.501 OEStGN A
17 B571.SCP TREES - MAPLE
--i~-~l.sof TPZES -
19 8571.541
'~1 SP RELOCATE EX!S~I,gG CE.
ENG. ESTIHATE
UNIT TOTAL
PREFERRED PAVING
TOTal.
.UFFnLO B~Tm~
UNZT , ~?~L __
350. O0 350. O0
8. O0 160. O0
B. O0
500.00
1.00
500.00 500.00
BO.O0 3.00
1BO.O0 1.50
360.00 1.00
500.00
60.00
B?O. O0
10.00
6.00
7.00
500.00
1E.O0
600.00
BO. O0
3.00
40.00
150.00 6.00 90.00 10.00
B,400.O0 6.50 B,600. O0 4.50
490.00 6.00 480.00 7.00
150.00
1,800.00
490.00
800.00 165.00
525.00 17,00
264.00 BO0.O0 380.00
595.00 45.00 1,575.00..__
95.00 BO0. O0 180.00
360.00 1~5.00
BO0. O0 BO.O0
15.00 1.50
800.00 87.00
800.00 50.00 500.00
7.50 8.00 10.00
175.00 30.00 150.00
170.00 BO0. O0 BO0. O0
B85.00 850.00 B50. O0
680.00 8.50 4B5.00
10,4~0.00 45.00 8,100.00
300.00 150.00 600.00
300,00 150.00 600,00
EA !.0 SO0.O0 500.00 170.00
EA ...... ~.~__ ~jO.O0 800,00 8B5,00
LF 170.0 5.00 850.00 4.00
LF 180.0 30.00 5,400.00 5B.O0
EA 4.0 150.00 600.00 '?5.00
EA ...... -4-. 0 1SO. 00
600.00 75.00
EA B.O 100.00
SY 540.0 1.75
LS 1.0 150.00
800.00 75.00
945.00 1.70
150.00 150.00
1_50.00 150.00
9!8.00 1.50
150.00 100.00
300.00
BlO.O0
100.00
TOTAL PART B-MSAF 14£.'-iOi£O~ZT~XE~O BOULEVARD
T~TAL BID-,'AP.T? i ~. 2
15,455.00
819,355.00
Iu,443.50
B00,575.85
17,930.00
BO3,1B5.60
:~'RO SE C T: 9' 193
'ITY OF MOUND -- LYNWO~D
TUXEDO BLVD
-- STREET
IMP -
PAGE
'ART ~-~SAP 14S-IOI-O5-TUX£DO BOULEVARD
ITEM UNIT QL~NTITY
ENG. ESTIMATE UALLEY PAVING BURY AND CARLI)~
UN I T TOTAL UN IT TOTAL I~l IT ll)TAL
350.00 500.00 500.00 PO0. O0 PO0.O0
160.00 10.00 200.00 4.90 98.00
--:360.00 4.00 7'20.00 1.85 P~5. O0
150.00 P5. O0 375.00 lO.O0 LSO. O0
P,400.O0 0.00 0.00 ?.00 2,600.00
490.00 6.50 4SS.00 6.30 441.00
1 P101.513 C~G RT OF WAY LS 1.0 350.00
p PIO4.SOI_REM CO~IC..~ ~F ..... 20.0 8.0o
3 ~104.501 REM. BIT. CURB LF 180.0 P.O0
4 PiOS.SO1 COMMON EXCAV. CY .1.5.0 10.00
. S~i__oS.,_S~._~.COMMON_eORRO~ CY 400.0 6.00
6 PIOS.SPS TOPSOIL BOR~O~ CY 7~.0 7.00
7 p~l.so~ B~T MA~ FOR M~X TN I,~ SO0,O0
B PSSl.514 BASE COURSE MIX TH 35.0 1S.O0
- 9-~a~;So~ B~: ~A: FOR ~X ~ ........ ~.~-- -~00.00
~0 pS~S.BO8 WEAR COURSE M~X TN ~0.0 PO.O0
800.00 165.00 PG4.00
525.00 50.00 1,750.00
~60.00 165.00 99.00
PO0.O0 ~0.00
BG.30 1,970.50
~00.00 ~0.00
S6.BO B6B. O0
10.00 50.00
26.00 130.00
840.00 840.00
PIO.O0 PIO.O0
5.70 9~9.00
44.00 7,g~O. O0
147.00 SBB.O0
lOS.O0 4PO. O0
PO0.O0 65.00 650.00
11 eL'~,57.SOP BIT MAT - TACK GAL__5.O 3.00
~ ~. sif-~ ~-~6F'- ~C~L ;'~' LF s. o 4 o. oo
iS ~5~.509 HH/Ce DESIGN H EA 1.O
14 ~5~.516 CAST AS~MDLIES EA 1.0
--~5~50i'BIT~INDUS CU~ LF ~70~0 5.00
~6 ~5~.5ol DESIGN A LF 1BO.O 30.00
l?.m~T!.S~ T~ES - MAPLE.__EA.. 4.0 150.00
~9 esT~.s,~ T~SF'LAHT TREE E~ ~.0
15.00 5.00 PS.00
200.00 E~.O0 175.00
SO0.O0
PO0.O0
500.00 900.00 900.00
PO0.O0 PSO.O0 PSO.O0
850.00 4.00 680.00
5,400.00 45.00 B, IO0.O0
600.00 PO0.O0 BO0.O0
600.00 190.00 760.00
PO0.O0 150.00
300.00
PO PS75.SOS SODDING SY S40.0 1.75
- ~i-SP RELOCATE EXISTING CB LS ..... 1.0 1SO.O0
94S. O0 1.70
-- l~O. O0 100. O0
15,455. O0
P19,355. O0
918.00 1.70
100.00 BO.O0
lB, 021. O0
P 07,2:7'2. ~,
130.00
918.00
BO.O0
19,147.50
P04,142. ~
PROSECT: 7193 ·
CITY OF HOUND -- LYNWOOD
TUXEDO
-- STREET
.PAGE 3
PART ~-MSAP IAS-101-05-TUXEDO BCLLEV~RD
!TEM UNIT Q~NT!T¥
ENG. ESTIMATE
UNIT TOTAL
_~I0!,S13 C~G RT OF WAY L~ 1,0 3S0,00 350,00
BlO~.soi PzM co~c. c~c, LF _ ___~0.~ a.oo lso.oo
-~i~.SO~' ~M,. BIT. CUP, B LF 1BO.O 8.00 ~0.00
BiOS.SO1 COMMON EXCAV. CY 1S.O 10.00 150.00
81~.523 .coMMoN_~ORROW CY~ 400.0 6.00 8,400.0~
8lOS.SSS TOPSOIL B~ERO- C'Y ?O.n 7.00 490.00
B~:i. S04 BIT MAT FOR MIX TN 1.6 500.00 800.00
833.1.514 BASE COUES:E MIX TN ........ 3~.._0 15.00 585.00
---~!.504 BIT ~AT FOR MIX TN 0.6 600.00
~341.508 ~AR COU~ MIX TN 10.0 ~0.00
~!_~7~.SOB BIT. MAT -_.TA~F _~A.L 5,0 ~3,00
8S03,Sll 12" RCP ST,CL,S LF S,O 40,00
8506,S09 MH/CB DESIGN H EA 1,0 SO0,O0
~e.'~, ~ SA 1.0 800.00
8505.51E' CAST ~,,~,,~
B~.50! BITUMI~OUS CU~ LF 170.0 5.00
eSSA.S01 DESIGN A LF 180.0 30.00
17 8S7!.508 T~ES - MAPLE .EA ~ 4.0 150.00
-~b--~s~.so~ T~ES -ASH ~A- ~.0 ~SO.O0
18 8S71.54i TP~NSPLAMT TP~E EA 8.0 100.00
BO BSTS.SOS °nr'~'?H~ SY 540.0 1.75
HARDRIV~S,
h~IT TOTAL
750. O0 750. O0 3SO. O0 3S0. O0
3. O0 60. O0 4 · O0 BO. O0
1. O0 180. O0 1. ~ 180. O0
10. O0 150. O0 BO. O0 300. O0
6.00 8,400.00 5.4)0 2,000.00
9. O0 630. O0 5.50 385, O0
160. O0 856. O0 lBS. O0 318. O0
30.00 1,050.00 84.75 866.85
1~. O0 117. O0
360.00 160.00 96.00
800.00 40.00 400.00
15.00 B.00 10.00
800.00 83.00 415.00
SO0.O0 1000.00 !,000.00
800.00 875.00 875.00
8S0.00 3.00 SlO.O0
5,400.00 46.00 B,BBO. O0
600.00 BO0.O0 800.00
600.00 190.00 760,00
BO0.O0 800.00 400.00
94S.00 1.75 ~S.O0
150.00 120.00 120.00
31.SS 319.50
10.00 SO. O0
79.00 urg5. O0
954.00 954.00
865.00 B6S. O0
4.00 680.00
47.00 8,460.00
BBS.O0 900.00
165.00 66~.00'--
75.00 150.00
B.BS 1,815.00
115.00 115.00
TOTnL PART ~:MSAp--14~LIOI-OS-TUXEDO BOULEVA~
TOTAL BID-PARTS
15,455.00
819,3SS.00
19,487.00
BiO,SSS.BE,
18,753.
813,480.85
-league of minnesota oities
March 14, 1986
Ms. Francene Clark
City Clerk
5341Maywood Rd.
MoUnd, M~ 55364
Dear Ms. Clark:
In October we informed cities that the League of Minnesota Cities and the Minnesota
Chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO)
had joined together to support tax increment-financing. A program of analysis and
representational activities is being undertaken. This step was taken in response to
resolutions adopted by city officials who studied the possibilities of legislative
action by the legislature in 1986 and beyond.
You will recall that the League/NAHRO program is to be financed by a voluntary
contribution from cities involved in tax increment finance. These contributions ar
to help ~ef~ay the direct, costs of employing Holmes and Graven to undertake the tax
increment finance study and assist in lobbying the League/NAHRO position on tax
increment finance.
The results of this work are already evident in the p~oceedings with tax increment in
this legislative session. Even though a less-than-desirable bill has advanced from
the House Committee on Taxes, cities would have been in much more difficulty if we
had not had the ability to marshal facts and figures in order to participate in the
legislative process and be able to prevent much worse possibilities.
This letter is sent to you to urge ~ou to please contribute your voluntary assess-
ment, which is $205.60. Several alternatives were considered before establishing the
assessment formula. Cities which had tax increment districts in 1984 payable 1985
tax year are being asked to proportionally contribute to the cost of the program.
The League urges your city to 'contribute your voluntary assessment to help defray the
costs incurred to perform the tax increment finance study and lobbying effort which
helping to preserving tax increment as a viable development tool financing for the
future.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Executive Director
I 83 univeesiCy avenue easC, sC. pauI, mimmesoCa 551 01
(61 2) 227-5600
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS BI LAND SURVEYORS m PLANNERS
March 2.5, 1986
Reply To:
12800 industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
Honorable Mayor &
Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
SUBJECT:
Bartlett Boulevard
MSAP 145-103-02
Street Improvements
MKA File #7831
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
Enclosed is a copy of the state approval of the plans for the Bartlett
Boulevard Street Improvement Project. Also included for your approval is an
Advertisement for Bids on this project, which sets the bid opening for Friday,
April 11, 1986. This bid date would then allow the council to review the bids
received at their regular meeting, scheduled for April 15, 1986.
Should the Council have any questions about this project, we would be
pleased to answer them.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
OC:jmj
Enclosures
~,NNESO~
OF' T~'~'
March 20, 1986
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone612-296-9875
William McCombs
Mound City Engineer
McCombs-Knutson Assoc.
12800 Industrial Park Blvd.
Minneapolis, MN. 55441
In reply refer to:
S.A.P. 145-103-02
CITY OF MOUND
Dear Mr. McCombs:
We are sending to you under separate cover a set of reduced sized prints
and the original plan for the above referenced project.
This plan has been approved and you are now authorized to advance the
status of this project.
Sincerely,
Julie Skallman
State Aid Plans & Spec. Engr.
cc:
W. M. Crawford - C. E. Weichselbaum, Dist. 5
File - 420
JS:me
A n Equal Opporlunio' Employer
Advertisement For Bids
· Street Improvements
Bartlett Boulevard MSAP 145-103-02
Mound, Minnesota
#7931
Sealed proposals will be received, publicly opened, and read aloud at 10:00
AM, Friday, April 11, 1986 at the Mound City Hall for street improvements on
Bartlett Boulevard. Approximate quantities consists of 1400 C.Y. excavation,
1500 Tons Class 2 Aggregate, 1000 Tons Class 5 Aggregate, 1700 S.Y. geotextile
fabric, 546 Tons Bituminous Surfacing, and related work. The bids will be
considered by the City Council of the City of Mound at their regular meeting at
7:30 PM, Tuesday, Apr11 15, 1986.
All Proposals shall be addressed to:
Fran Clark, City Clerk
City of Mound
5241Maywood Road
Mound, MN 553(:F4
and shall be on the form included in the specifications and made a part of the
contract documents.
Copies of the plans and specifications and other proposed contract
documents are on file with the City Clerk and at the office of McCombs-Knutson
Associates, Inc., 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota 55441.
Plans and specifications for use in preparing bids may be obtained at the
office of the Engineer upon deposit of $25.00. The full amount of the deposit
for one set will be refunded to each bidder who has made a deposit and has
filed a bid with the Owner, upon return of the plans and specifications within
ten (10) days after the bids are opened.
Each bidder shall file with his bid a cashier's check, certified check, or
bid bond in an amount of not less than five (5) percent of the total amount of
the bid. No bid may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after the bids are
opened.
The City of Mound reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive
any informalities or irregularities therein.
CITY OF MOUND, Minnesota
ATTEST: Fran Clark, City Clerk
Robert Polston, Mayor
Lcagu¢ of
Increment Financing Project
October 31, 1985
Ms. Francene Clark
City Clerk
5341Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Clark:
Earlier this month we informed cities that the League of Minnesota Cities and the
Minnesota Chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
(NAHRO) had joined together to support tax increment financing.
A;program of analysis and representational activities was developed. This step was
taken in response to resolutions adopted by city officials who studied the possibilities
of legislative action by the legislature in 1986 and beyond. The Boards of Directors of
both the League and NAHRO reviewed the proposal and unanimously endorsed the program.
The League/NAHRO committee retained the law firm of Holmes and Graven as a consultant.
Pursuant to this program cities have already received a questionnaire on tax increment
finance usage which will provide data for a comprehensive study.
City officials will recall that the League/NAHRO program is to be financed by voluntary
contributions from cities involved in tax increment finance. These contributions will
defray the direct costs of employing Holmes and Graven while the League would provide
staff and other services to the effort on behalf of the cities who will benefit from the
overall activity, but are not currently engaged in the use of tax increment finance.
This letter officially requests your financial contribution in accordance with the
enclosed invoice. Several alternatives were considered before establishing the
assessment formula. All cities which ~ad tax increment districts in 1984 payable 1985
tax year are being asked to proportionally contribute to the cost of the program.
The two factors used are the total assessed value in tax increment districts and the
total assessed value of your city. Both of these factors have been adjusted by sales
ratio. Statewide totals for all cities using tax increment were established along with
each city's percent of that total. Half the cost of the project is assessed based on
each city's proportionate share of the total assessed value of the cities involved. The
factors used and the resulting assessments are noted in the attached list.
We sincerely hope that your city will comply with its voluntary assessment to help
preserve tax increment as a viable development tool financing in the future.
Sincerely,
Susan Edel
LMC President
Sincerely,
Nancy Re'eves
NAHRO President
Code City
TIF TXF ~ ~ Tota]
F~ctor Assessment Factor Assess~nt Assessment
143 I~1 HOPE
1~ PLY~OJTH
147 RIDe:In n
I~
1~ ST ~ (~)
1~ ~YZATn
~y ~y
I~ F~ ~I~
1~ ~ BRI~
0.2068g 111.71 0.57071l 305. 35
O.P..84~ 15P..06 1.1173~ 597.76
1,5096g 607.61 O. 64~6~ 3&4. 64
0.24~9~ 13h00 1,380~ 738.40
0,9~111 4~.77 1,487~ 795,64
0.0617~ ~.~ 0,261~ 1~.08
O. I'J{91 ~,3~ 0.2105~ 112.60
h7047~ 912.04 O. 358~ 191,69
O, 0560~ ~.96 0,3458I 165.(k2
0.3O19~ 161.~ O. 1050~ 56.15
O, OGT~ 35.~ 0.055~
0,9~0~ 49P.,55 5. P.813~
0,11681 62..50 1,3395I 716.65
1.500~ 60~., ~ 1,743t~I 932,85
0.18181 97. I~4 0.841~ 4~). 12
O. 1078~ 57.67 0.~70~
4.1051~ P., 196.1~4 1.6168I 66~. 99
P..09ill 1,1i8.7i 4. ii061 ~199.~
~-M4~ 1,270.54 1.6473~
h 1658~ ~3. 71 O. 86281 461.58
0.11861 63.45 0.0893~ 47.76
O, ~ IR. 53 1.1030~ 590.10
0.04~ ~-78 0,06~I 33.45
39,718~ 21,249,39 16,6815I 8,9~4. fx2
O, 8~{76I 480.21 3. 05~3~ 1,633.00
_ ____ 0, 0003~0.15 0.3840S. 205.4.5
1.1~1I $0E45 0,9895I 5~.40
O, 197~ 105.84
1. ~-'-'~ 'J~3~ 1.481~ '~.68
0.8740~ 467.60 0.,5c~05I 278.44
O, 0P..31I IP..34 0,4013~ 214,71
0.3949~ 211.~ 0.3938~ i~I0.68
0.05311 ~.~ O. I%5~ 105.11
O. 1898~ 97.78 0.9~ 531.~
0.14~ 75.38 O. ~J75I
O.t~ 108.46 2.1700~ 1,1S0.94
0.0891I 47.~
417.06
749. 84
1,1~.46
669.40
I,P.88.41
173,11
194.93
1,103.7~
~14.98
217.67
$5.51
I, ~3. 76
184.66
391.14
544.60
5~.a6
319.~
1,~54.44
468.~
3,318.0~
779.14
1,735.37
547.36
20~..21
3,318.01
P., 15~. ~6
1,085.~
lih2i
710.63
30,174.0~
I, 1~1.85
746.04
E~7.05
2, 46~. 89
~1.%
133.50
~. 17
288.11
I, a69. 40
11,718.10
496.3O
~ SPRII~FIEI.I)
574 ~R~Uq
1069
County
110~ ~ FALLS
1105 K~YON
1107 Pll~ I~'
110~ ~
(J'T)
TIF TIF ~ ~ Total
F~toe gssessm~t Fac'toe ~ssessmnt ~sessmnt
O, OJ~ ~4, f~ O, Oe3~ 44, S~
0.5~I3~ PTtLS9 O.L~ 134.99
1,35~7~ 7~,93 0,5805% 310,55
O. O~K~J~ 18.18 0. g14:~% 114.76
O. 0578% ~. 91 O. 17'/~ 95,18
O, OP.J~ 15.42 0.0337~ la. O1
0,~!19~ 118,70 O. 1375% 73.57
0.0010~ 0.~ O, OOeC~ 4.74
0,0331% 1%72 0,0391% ~,90
1.6091% 860,87 O,f~?~ 4~3.67
O.(X)~3~ L40 O. O<T:7EY. 14.5~
O.O~c~ ILO~ 0.07~4% 3L73
0.0316% I~ 0.04~% 23.41
O, O0~X 1,4~ 0,00~1% L~5
O, 0c%5% 14,18 O, 310b'~ lS~, I1 **
O, OG~ 1,19 O, 0~4~% 13,16 **
O, 000~ 0.10 O. 00~% L4~ i
0.1016%
O. I~P.3'~ 5,44 0,0441% 23,61
0. M31% ~I.77 O. 67~1% 3~1.15 :
O. OIB3~ 9.81 0.0360~ 19.25
O. 0473% gLO9 O. 100~ 53.~
0.01~ 6.50 0.09~ 50.9~
__ 0.0031% 1.~5 O. 036~.. 19.38
0.43 O. 0474% 25, Y/ i
0.61 O. 0c~63~ 14,09 i
0.(X~4% 1.~ 0.0106% 5.67
O. 0427~ :~.8~ 0.0~53~ ~,~
0.0047~ 2.51 0.0~ 19.91
O. 0~.~ lg.~ 0.05~I~ ~,~
O. _~%~ 351.10 1,1554% 618.1~
69,38
413.88
1003'/,4~
35.00
1,3~4.53
35.00
53.81
4O, 34
1~.31
48.71
3~00
41.%
TIF TIF RRV
Fac*tm. Pmsessmnt Fac'tm'
Code City
Total
P~ses~t
lilO ZLISROTA
8ouston County
1170 LA CR~CENT
Isanti Count),
I~_~O CmmRID6E
ltasca County
I~.~ SR~V4D RP3I~
J&ckso~ Cou~y
Kanabec County
135~ 06ILVIE
Kandiy~£ County
1393 MIU]~IR
I~ gui Parle
Le Seuer County
1536 LE
1537 LE StEUR
1539 M~ ~ (JT)
Lyon County
Ncl_-od County
Ri~t in County
1757
Iqeeke~ County
1790 LITDFII~)
#file ~ Cour~y .
1818 KI LAIq
18~1 PRIM:ETON (~T)
NONL~ C~ty
19~4 GL~TIN
#icollet County
1974 NICOU_rT
Nobles County
Norman D~uwty
~5
Oimst~ County
~077
46.32
14.06
4.68
0.65
42,97
1.21
18.84
0.92
0.85
1~.25
71.31
14.81
10.~
7.43
14.~
~71
~.70
~.~7
1~.~
37.22 ',
244.45 **
8.68 :
23.59 :
50,90
313.11 ;
9.91
17.10 :
24.70 :
83.41
60. Q
147.09
35.00
157.44
80,1g
71.7~
162. Ot
149.12
193.04
37.87
49,11
297, T~
~7 IU. UT~
~?04 HIBBI~6
ElI1 R]U~TAIN I~
E/13 PRDCT~
TIF TIF ~ ~
0.0~6% 15,&2 0.4T20$
O. 0318~ 17. O~ O. 0624%
1,419.05
Total
1{.5{ : 3~.00
4L&?. t 57.05
83.51 { 14~.90
13.03 : 3L13
?5,96 t 95.63
7.96 : 35.00
i~IL~ ; .' 399.~
6,39 i 35.0O
159.~ ; 211.14
57.3~ t I~.30
17.~5 ; 35.00
~43.94 i ~ 137.15
~.-'~ : 3~.00
1~3.10 t 317.34
0.0597Z 31.96 - 0,03~0% ~.-~ { ~?..:~
0.000~% 0.89 0.0109~
0.001~ 0.6~ 0.0614%
O. IOTJ~ ~.70 . 0.1838%
O, 5830~ 311.91 1.4103~
O. 00~3~ I.P-.3 0,041~
O, ~ 13~, 13 O.
0.001~5 O. G3 0.007~
0.03~ ~0.~5
O. 1705% 91.23 O. 05c'~
0,01~5% 9.87 0.0096%
5.8?. t 35.00
3~66 t 35,0O
98. Z3 : .157.03
754.50 | 1,066.41
E2.06 ; 3~.00
3.~3 : 3~.00
~0,,~ i 71.47
15,31 : ~.~1
~.E~ | 119.5I
5.16 : ~.00
~ity
iht o~an County
3110 ~IR
~ilkin ~mty
31~ ~RI~
~im~ ~ty
31~ ~ ~
31~ ~I~
~ight ~ty
~17 ~I~
~18 ~ ·
TIF
Facto~
(.TT)
TIF
~sess~e~t
-5-
~ssessMnt
0.0017~ 0.91 0,0056% 3.00
O. 0~3~ ~3. M 0.2264% 121.11
0.0~ 1~ 0,~ 31.~
0.~ 0.~ 0.~1~ ~.~
O. ~ 1~ ~ 0.)~% 319.07
0.~¢~ ~67 0.~1~ 11.~
0.~ ~IZ~ O. ~ 7~.78
0.~7~ ~ 0.~ ~¢.~
0.~7~ ~ 0.~ ~7
0.01~ ~M 0.~ ~¢7.~
0.~1~ 0.07 0.~ ~.~
0.0234% 12,51 0.01~5% 8.83
O. 130~% 74.60 O, Oe~r 43.%
IO0. OCXX~~3~fX)O, O0100.0000~ ~,~X)O. O0
Total
35.00
144.79
35.00
473. Ol
35.00
~.84.44
61. 31
80.44
3~.00
I 35.00
107,674.73
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364
March 17, 1986
Mound City Council
5341Maywood Road
~und, Minnesota 55364
Dear Councilmembers;
The Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association recently con-
tracted wit~ Bordewick & Company to conduct an actuarial study for our
retirement fund. The study was conducted based on monies in this fund
as of December 31, 1985. A copy of the actuarial study is attached for
your review.
The acturial study was conducted to determine'current normal costs
and accrued liabilities based on actuarial assumptions required by state
law. Another objective of this study was to determine the costs o~ in-
creasing the benefit levels from the current benefit level, of $250.00 per
month. The study contains discussions of the purpose, the current assets,
the impact of benefit increases, the benefit plan outline, the actuarial
assumptions, and the member statistics.
The Relief Association Pension Fund is currently supported by a com-
bination of 2% State Aid and city contributions. In 1985 the 2% State Aid
was $34,021 and has historically increased each year with increasing pro-
perty values within our coverage area. In 1986 the city is contributing
$43,923 or $3660.25 each month. Therefore, even.assuming the 2% State Aid
stays steady, the total funding for 1986 should total $77,944.
Page five of the actuarial study contains a chart which shows the
annual contribution requirements for various benefit levels of $250 per
month up to $290 per month. Based on an annual funding of $77,944 the
study shows we can easily afford to pay a $280 per month benefit level
and almost a $290 per month benefit. This increase is due to a good re-
turn on fund investments and steady increases in contributions from the
city.
/inc.r-Xhe Relief Association Board would like to propose a two-step benefit~~
ease. We would like to increase the benefits tm $280 per month ef-
fective July 1, 1986. Assuming some increases in 2% State Aid and city
~ontrtbutions in 1987, we would like to increase the benefit level to ~
will require no additional city' funding and an increase to the $290 benefit
assumes an increase consistent with the last four or five years. _~
~--~'~-The Relief Association Board as well as the Fire Department Board -~
feel strongly that this benefit increase is necessary to continue to attract
quality firefighters as well as keep the trained firefighters we now have
on the department. With greater demands on the individuals' time it is
difficult to find people to volunteer the required time needed to be a
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364
PAGE 2
March 17, 1986
good firefighter. In addition, training has become more involved in recent
years requiring even additional commitments. Although. the fire depart-
ment's turnover rate is minimal, we do need to fill some openings each
year and we must find quality, dedicated people to keep our organization
capable and efficient. The main benefit to draw qualified people into the
fire department is this retirement benefit we are proposing to increase.
In addition, we would like to point out the importance of continued
gradual increases in city contributions to the pension fund. With Steady,
gradual increases we can approach the city council concerning a benefit
increase without asking for sinificant increases in funding. Many other
area departments have indicated to us the substantial funding increases
they had to request from their city Councils to fund a benefit increase.
.Also note that hourly wages have bee~ held steady and we intend to con-
tinue to hold them steady if we contimue to get pension fund increases.
If there is agreement with our proposal, we will need an approved
'motion.by the Mnund City Council and a letter stating the approval of
benefit increases for tbe Mound Fire Department Relief Association Pension
Fund. 'The city council approval is required since the city makes contributions
to our pension fund.
I..hope this letter adequately discusses the attached actuarial study
and the resulting proposed benefit increase. If questions remain or any
of you would like to discuss our proposal, please contact us.
Sincerely,.
Mo'mad Fire Department Relief Association
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE
DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC,
ACTUARIAL VALUATION
DECEMBER 31, 1985
BORDEWICK 8( CO.
ACTUAI~IE$ AND CONSULTANTS
8100 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
EDINA, MN $5435
February 24, 1986
Board of Trustees
Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association, Inc.
P.O. Box 37
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Attention: Mr. David J. Carlson, president
Gentlemen:
Attached is the report which presents the results of the December 31, 1985
.Actuarial Valuation of the Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association,
Inc.
I certify that all calculations with respect to the valuation were performed
on the basis of the assumptions and methods outlined in the Exhibits of the
report and the results are correct to the best of'my knowledge.
The Actuarial Valuation was conducted in accordance with my understanding of
the provisions of Chapter 356 of the Minnesota Statutes.
Sincerely,
James R. Bordewick, F.S.A.
JRB:cah
Attachment
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION~ INC.
ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1985
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 356.216 of Minnesota Statutes requires that an actuarial valuation
of the fund be conducted periodically.
An actuarial valuation is a calculation to determine the normal cost and
accrued liability of the fund and includes a determination of the payment
necessary to amortize the unfunded liability over a stated period and a
determination of the payment necessary to keep the unfunded liability from
increasing.
The actuarial valuation is conducted according'to'a stated actuarial cost
method, Entry Age Normal Cost, and, as prescribed in Chapter 356.215,
Subdivision 4(4), an interest assumption of 5% must be utilized.
The By-Laws of the Association were amended in 1984 to provide for a
monthly service pension of $240 and again in 1985 to provide for a monthly
service pension of $250.
-MEMBERSHIP
There were 36 active members and 17 inactive members included in the
actuarial costs. Member statistics are shown in Exhibit B and C.
ASSUMPTION CHANGES
The actuarial assumptions are shown in Exhibit D. 'There were no changes
in the actuarial assumptions from the previous actuarial valuation.
BORDEWICK J~ CO.
ASSETS
Chapter 356.20, Subdivision 4 as applied to firefighter's relief associations
enumered in Chapter 69.771 of the Minnesota Statutes requires that assets
be reported on a basis which is approximately a cost basis. However, it is
our opinion that the asset basis for the actuarial valuation can be on a
different basis and we have continued the practice of using market value.
The market value of the assets on December 31, 1985 was $710,881.74 and
th& cost value on the same date was $684,598.44.
The table below shows the development of the market value from the last
actuarial valuation which was December 31, 1983.
Market Value, 12-31-83
Receipts
Contributions
Investment Income
Realized Capital Gains
Disbursements
Benefit Payments
Expenses
Net Income
Unrealized Appreciation
Market Value, 12-31-85
· $138,475
138,721
5,244
$282,440
$ 89,006
11,206
$100,212
$516,408
$182,228
$ 12,246
$710,882'
* Reflects accrued trustees fees for 1985of $4,654.
-2- BORDEWICK ~ Co.
ACTUARIAL BALANCE SHEET
The actuarial balance sheet showing accrued assets and liabilities is shown
below as ~f December 31, 1985.
Assets
Market Value of current assets
Unfunded accrued liability
· Present value of future normal costs
Liabilities
Present value of benefits - active members
inactive members
$ 710,882
351,879
299,977
$1,362,738
$ 719,393
643,345
$1,362,738
-3-
E~ORDEWlCK R,. Co.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGEIN UNFUNDED ACCRUED LIABILITY
The unfunded accrued liability increased by $14,839 from December'31, 1983
to December 31, 1985. The analysis of this change is shown below.
1. Unfunded Accrued Liability, 12-31-82
$337,040
Amount By Which Contributions Were
Greater Than Normal Costs and
Interest Requirements.
45,442
· 3. Increase In Accrued Liability Due
To Benefit Increases
161,671
4. Actuarial Gain For The Period
lO1,390
5. Unfunded Accrued Liability, 12-31-85:
(1) - (2) + (3) - (4)
$351,879
The actuarial gain of $101,390 was primarily due to investment earnings in
excess of the actuarial assumption of 5%.
CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS
Section 69.773, Subdivision 4 of the Minnesota Statutes states that the
contribution requirement is equal to the normal cost and amortization of
the unfunded accrued liability by December 31, 2000 in this case.
The n6rmal cost is $27,021 and the contribution requirement as of December
31, 1985' is $59,308.
The contribution required to keep the unfunded accrued liability from
increasing is $45,966 on December 31, 1985.
IMPACT OF BENEFIT INCREASES
It was requested that we determine the financial impact of benefit increases
to active and inactive members. The current benefit level is $250 a month.
For every $10 increase in the monthly benefit, the normal cost will increase
by $1,064 and the accrued liability by $41,881. The increase in the accrued
liability is amortized over 20 years by statute and a new amortization
period is determined for the entire unfunded accrued liability. The
amortization period may be extended depending on the size of the increase
in the accrued liability.
In order to eliminate some of the volatility which may exist with the use of
market value in making future cost estimates, we have developed the contri-
butions for various benefit levels on an asset basis which recognizes only
one-third of the difference between cost and market value. The contribution
requirement under the $250.benefit level is shown on this basis for
comparison.
-4- BORDEWlCK ~: Co.
IMPACT OF BENEFIT INCREASES
$250 $260
Benefit Levels
$270 $280
$290
Unfunded Accrued
Liability $369,402 $411,283 $453,164 $495,045 $536,926
Full Funding Date:
December 31 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001
Annual Contribution
Requirement $ 60,915 $ 65,822 $ 68,972 $ 73,717 $ 78,462
EXHIBITS
Five exhibits are attached to this report. They are:
Exhibit A ..... Plan Outline
Exhibit B ..... Member Statistics
Exhibit C ..... Age/Service Distribution of Active Members
Exhibit D ..... Actuarial Assumptions
Exhibit E ..... Actuarial Funding Method
-5- EBORDEWICK ~ CO.
EXHIBITS
BORDEWlCK ~ Co.
EXHIBIT A
PLAN OUTLINE
1. ELIGIBILITY: Member of The Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief
Association, Inc. after having served a one year probationary period.
Not over age 35 at time of initial membership.
2. SERVICE REQUIREMENT: The later of age 50 or after completion of 20 years
of service. Must retire at age 60.
The.monthly benefit payable is $250.
e
DEFERRED PENSION: Retirement prior to age 50 with 20 years of service.
The monthly benefit payable at ~ge 50 is $250.
DISABILITY PENSION: Disability which prevents the member from performing
duties for at least two weeks.
The monthly benefit payable is $2'50 per month prorated per day.
DEATH AND SURVIVOR BENEFITS: These benefits are applicable if the member
dies prior to or after retirement.
FUNERAL BENEFIT: $1,500.
WIDOWS AND CHILDRENS BENEFITS: Widow receives 75% of member's
monthly pension for life or ~until remarriage.
Surviving children receive 25% of member's monthly pension until
age 18 or marriage.
If the event of death of member and wife, children receive $250
per month until age 18 or marriage.
The maximum family benefit is $250 per month.
BORDEWICK ~ Co.
ACTIVE MEMBERS
EXHIBIT B
MEMBER STATISTICS
1. There were 36 active members included in the actuarial cots. An age/
service distribution is shown in Exhibit ¢.
2. The average entry age (age at membership) for the 36 active members is
24.9.
RETI RED 'MEMBERS
1. There were 13 retired members included in the actuarial costs.
2. The total annual retirement benefits payable to these members is $39,000.
3. The average retirement age for these, member~ has been age 52.2 arid
average current age of these members is age 62.8.
SURVIVORS OF MEMBERS
1. There were 3 widows included in the actuarial costs.
2.' The-total annual widow's benefits payable is $6,750.
OTHER
1. Five members have terminated since January l, i984.
members was vested.
One of these
There has been 5 disabilities since January l, 1984. These disabilities
were temporary disabilities. There have been no permanent disabilities
since January l, 1979,
-7- BORDEWICK 8~ CO.
Age O-1
15-19
20-24
25-29 3
30-34 2
35-39
40-44
45-49
50=54
55-59
60-64
65+
Total 5
EXHIBIT C
AGE/SERVICE DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS
DECEMBER 31, lg85
COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE
2-4 5-9 lO-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30+
5
1
3
4
5 1
1 2
1 2
2 9 ll 5 4
Average Age: 35.3
Average Service: 9.7 years
Total
1
9
7
9
5
5
36
-8- BORDEWICK 8( Co.
MORTALITY:
MEMBER TURNOVER:
DISABILITY:
RETIREMENT:
INTEREST:
MARITAL STATUS:
ASSET BASIS:
EXHIBIT D
ACTUARIAL*ASSUMPTIONS
1971 Group Annuity Mortality Table.
None assumed.
Age retirement costs loaded 1%.
The later of age 53 or after 20
years of service.
5%, compounded annually.
85% of members in payment status
were assumed to be married with'a
spouse two years younger than the
member.
Market. value.
-9- BOROEWICK & Co.
EXHIBIT E
ACTUARIAL FUNDING METHOD
ENTRY AGE NORMAL
This actuarial funding method is one of the family of projected benefit
cost methods. An estimate of the projected benefits expected to be payable
under the plan is required to determine the costs and liabilities with
this funding method.
The NORMAL COST for each active member is the annual amount required from
the member's entry date to retirement date so that the accumulated contributions
at termination or retirement will equal the liability at that time. This
cost is expressed as a level annual amount.
The PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE BENEFITS is equal to the value of the future
benefits expected to be payable discounted back to the member's current age.
Discounts include such items as mortality, turnover, interest, and any other
decremental assumptions. The value includes the value of benefits for both
active and inactive members.
The PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NORMAL COSTS is equal to the value of the future
NORMAL COSTS for the active members di'scounted for the decrements described
above and payable from the member's current age to retirement age.
The ACCRUED LIABILITY is equal to the difference between the PRESENT VALUE OF
FUTURE BENEFITS and the PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NORMAL COSTS.
The UNFUNDED LIABILITY is equal to the difference between the ACCRUED LIABILITY
and the current valuation assets.
ACTUARIAL GAINS AND LOSSES are reflected in adjustments to the UNFUNDED
LIABILITY from year to year.
- 1 O- I~ORDEWlCK ~)( Co.
The Budget
The foll~wing is a revised proposal for re-defi~g and changing
\_
the Moons City ~uncil Budgeting Process. The c/9~ncil must.set the
goals and budget ~uidelines each city department shall meet, allocate
funds to the depart~nts for achieving t~goals;
monitor
the
progress
in achieving those gOa~ evaluate t~/program and add to, amen~, or
delete on the basis of ef~ctive~ss of the program and availability
of funds-. 4/`
City spending at a~ggher~ra~e than inflation, with no increases
in services, or oV~ reducti0n in~S~ices, as occurred in the %985
city budget isp a~ceptable. 'I define~goal for the Mound City
Council asp_t~ maintain and ihcre~se the ~ry of services to
the citizens of Mound at a stabiliZed or even redu~te of
spending.
The Proposal
1. Attached hereto is a photocopy of the statutory requirements
Of the city's budget process. Above all else, the city must require a
submission to the council of the final estimates for public review and
adoption on' time pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~412.701.
2. (Deleted).
3. (Revised) During April through June, the Council shall, by
public hearing, gain input from the citizens as to the expected level
of city services to be provided in the next calendar year. The
Council shall establish budget guidelines, and shall submit policy
directions, goals and objectives to the City Manager so the
Department Heads may begin to d~velop their budget requests.
4. (Revised) Beginning in~7~, the Department Heads .shall
submit their preliminary budget requests to the City Manager. The
City Manager shall prepare proposed spending requests for submission
to the Council.
5. Promptly at the first regular monthly meeting in September,
the final budget requests shall be presented to the Council and the
public, at which meeting shall.begin the first round of public
hea~ings on the budget.
· 6. (Deleted)
7. The review process: to ignore the budget after making the
tax levy is to miss an important'advantage Of budgeting, i.e. to
enable the Council to track and control city operations.
a. The city manager shall receive from the Department Heads, and
report to the Council, monthly budget reports which include the budget
amount for each department, the amount the department has already
spent, and the amount remaining. The monthly report shall also
include an account of accomplishments as well aS~financial information
so the Council can ensure it is successfully reaching its goals.
b. (Revised) The Council shall require from the city manager
writte~quarterl~ reports in A~O~to~er, to
indicate how closel~¢h c~r~nt e~enditures and
also a status report on al/~ro~all enable the council
to have s pe~ev~e~ so as .to allow fo~.o~~tions t~
.~ns~ing of the Dudge~ anO reac~ng object,uss set Dy~L~ne
c. (Revised) In ~ there shall be a year end report,
written and verbal, from the City Manager who shall provide a recap
of the financial picture of the city, i.e. how closely budget
estimates matched expenditures for the year completed. Further, there
shall be a recap of reasons for failure, if any, in fulfilling any
goals so that the Council may take steps to ensure that the same
problems will not arise again.
8. The budget document shall be changed so as to include the
services the city shall provide, and the cost therefore.
The present line item budget approach shall be kept; but it does
not'help the Council evaluate individual programs effectively.
Therefore, services shall be emphasized. The entire cost of a
service, even if it crosses departmental lines, shall be stated. The
service shall be identified in terms of the'cost of each in dollars.
There shall be listed a spending.history and spending requests in
terms of dollars and percentages~of increased spending. Since'this
budget document will be new, the first one will have a spending
history covering the last three years and beginning with the next
budget document the spending history for the past two fiscal years as
required by statute.
RATIONALE _/~---
This..~..~get approach for the Council will be mor~ti~° consuming
than it is use-d~t~4o~ver, it will incre~s~he Council's knowledge
of city operations; furthe~"-~will Provi~e the budgetary tool by
which this Council can set and a¢¢~ish goals and achieve fiscal
stability;
realistic
it will allow' ~the"CoU~cil ~~~with a more
knowledge'of our choiCes and expectations ~results.
§ 412.691 STATUTORY CITIES
approved by the council as provided in section 412.271. All other purchases shall be made
and all other contracts let by council after the recommendation of the manager has first
been obtained. All contracts, bonds and instruments of every kind to which the city is a
party shall be signed by the mayor, and the manager on behalf of the city and shall be
executed in the name of the city.
Amended by Laws 1959, c. 526, '§ .1; laws 1973. c. 123, art. 2, § 1.
'-1973 Amendment. Laws 1973, c: 123, art. 2, as purcha.~ing agent empowered to make neces-
§ 1, subd. 2, was a general authorization for the sary purchases and zupplies for all departments
deletion of the term "village" and the substitu- of the village within a limited amount, in view of
tion, where appropria,,te, of the term "city" or the the fact that the authority did not fix any start-
term "statutory city.' dards or give directions pursuant to which the
'. administrator should act. Op. Atty. Gen.. 471f,
Notes of Deetsion~ Oct. 24, 1961.
!. Con~tru~tion and application
Village administrator in village operating un- ·
der standard plan of government could not act
412.701. Budgeting
The manager shall prepare the estimates for the annual budget. The budget shall be
by funds and shall include ali the funds of the city, e'xcept the funds made up of proceeds
of bond issues, utility funds, and special assessment funds, and may include any of such
funds at the discretion of the council. The estimates of expenditures for each fund
budgeted shall be arranged for each department or division of the city under the
following heads: -
(1) ordinary, expenses (for operation, maintenance, and repairs); (2) payment of princi-
pal and interest on bonds and other fixed charges; (3) capital outlays (for new construe-
tion, new equipment, and all improvements of a lasting character). Ordinary expenses
shall be sub-divided into: (al salaries and wages, with a list of all salaried offices and
positions, including the salary allowance and the number of persons holding each; (b)
other expenses, with sufficient detail to be readily understood. Ali increases and
decreases shall be clearly shown. In parallel columns shall be added the amounts granted
and the amounts expended under similar heads for'the past' two completed fiscal years
and the current fiscal year, actual to date and estimated for the balance of the year. In
addition to the estimates of expenditures, the budget shall include for each budgeted fund
a statement of the revenues which have accrued for the past two completed fiscal years
with the amount collected and the uncollected balances together with the same informa-
tion, based in so far as necessary on estimates, for the current fiscal year, and an
estimate of the revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. The statement of revenues for each
year shall specify the following items: sums derived from (al taxation, (b) fees, {c) fines,
(d) interest, (el miscellan~eous, not included in the foregoin, g, (fl sales and rentals, (gl
earnings of public utilities and other public service enterprsses, (h) special assessments,
and (il sales of bonds and other.obligations. Such estimates shall be printed or typewrit-
ten and there shall be sufficient copies for each member of the council, for the manager.
for the clerk, and three, at least, to be posted in public places in the city. The estimates
shall be submitted to the Council at its first regular monthly meeting in September and
shall be made public. The manager may submit with the estimates such explanatory
statement or statements as he may deem necessary, and during the first three years of
opera~ion under Optional Plan Bt he shall be authorized to interpret the requirements of
this section as requiring only such comparisons of the city's finances with those of the
previous government of ..the city as may be feasible and pertinenL,
Amended by L~ws 1973, c. 123, art. 2. § 1.
1973 Amendment. L~ws 1973, c. 123, art. 2, deletion of the term "village" and the substitu-
§ 1, subd. 2. was a general authorization for the
86
STATUTORY CITIES
lion, where appropriate, of the term "city" or the
term "statutory city."
{}412.731
412.711. Consideration of budget; tax levy
The budget shall,be.the principal item of business at the first regular monthly meeting
of the council in Stpt~mber and the council shall hold adjour,,ed meetings from time to
dme until all the estimates have ~en considered. The meetings shall be so conduced as
~ give interested citizens a ~asonab{e op~rtunity to be heard. The budget estima~s
shall ~ read in full and the manager shall explain the various items thereof
may ~ deemed necessary by the council. The annual budget finally agreed upon shah
set forth in de~i{ the complete financial plan of the city for the ensuing fiscal year for the
fund~ budgeted and shah be signc~ by the majority of the council when adopted. It shah
indicate the sums to be raised and from what sources and the sums to be spent and for
what pur~sc~ according to the plan indicated in section 412.701. The to~l sum
app~priated shall [~. {ess than the to~{ estimated revenue by a safe margin. The council
shall adopt the budget not later than the first day of October hy -a ~solution which shall
set forth the total i~r each budgeted fund and each department w/th such segregation
to ubjec~ ami purposes of ex~'nditures as the council deems necessary for purposes of
budget control. The council shall also adopt a resolution levying whatever ~xea it
conside~ necessary within s~tutory limits for the ensuing year for each fund. The
levy resolution shall be certified to the county auditor in accordance with law not later
than October 10. At the ~'ginning of the fiscal year, the sums fixed in the budget
resolution shall t~, and become appropriat~ for the several pur~ses named in the budget
resolution and no other.
Am,.nded by ~ws 1~73. c. 123. ar~ 2. ~ 1.
'!~73 Amendment. laws. 1973. e. 123. art. 2. tkm. whe~ appropriate, of the ~rm "city" or
q I. subd. 2. ~as a gc,eral authorizatio, fi,r the term "statutory city."
deletion uf thc term "village" and the substitu.
412.721. Budget provisionS, enforcement~ budget alluwunce,.penalty 'for exc~ing
It shall be the duty of the manager to enfo~e strictly the provisions o .
s~al{ not approve any order uuon th~ t ......... t .......... ~ the budgeL He
h,m h~ been made'in ,~ i.~jl..,~/'=.~:~,~.~' '~' ~ny expenmtur~ unless an approp~-
r- Id.( .... .,,,xc Icit alter oeouctmg the
h,.tal past exi~.nditures urn{ the sum o~ all ou~tundin~ orders un '
olficer or employee of the cit~ ~'~,,n ,,. ........... - . d m~umbrances.
{,Urt~)se and to ~h ............... ~.~"T" ,~ a. uruer or mu~e uny purch~e exeet for a
by ;m- ',e~o.: X,7:":""Z ~.,n~f]z't~ 79 t~e ~udget resolution. Any obli ation i~eur
.;,..,..~: i .m t,,~ t mptoy ut the cry Io~ any our~ose not ~,,,~...:...l~g: ...... re~
,- ...... ... . -..y .... ,,, c%c~s~ o~ the amount therein authoriz ~ a
p~ ~ona~ ou~gauon u{~n the ~on recurring the ex{~nditure, ed shall be
A,m.nd~ bv laws 1973, c. 123, art. '~ ~ 1. "
1973 Amendment. i-,wa 1973. c. 1°~, art. 2,.
1. sut~i. 2, was a general authorization for {he
,i,.h,t*o,~ of the term "village" and the subatitu- ·
2.731. Modification of I;udget
lion. where appropriate, of the term "city" or the
term "statutory city."
After the budget resolution has been adopted the council shall have no power to
mcrcast, the amounts fixed iii the budget resolution, by the insertion of new items or
,,thcr~'ise. bt, vond the estimated revenues unit,ss the actual receip~ exceed the estimates
and then not' beyond the actual receipts. The council may at uny time by resolution
approvrd by a ~our fifths vote of aH the membe~ of the council reduce the sums
~l'l'nq,rmted for any i,urp,,se by. the budget rcsolution or authorize the transfer of sums
tro,n unencumi,ercd I,alunces of appropriations in the budget resolution ~ other pur-
l ,O.~t'fi. ,
87
RESOLUTION NO. 86-
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 86- PROCLAIMING
APRIL 13 THROUGH APRIL 19, 1986 "BUILDING SAFETY WEEKII
WHEREAS, the membership of the North Star Chapter of the International Conference
of Building Officials is comprised of Building Officials of the various
Cities and Counties of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of Building Officials to administer the State
Construction Codes, adopted by the Cities and Counties concerned with
providing a minimum measure of protection for the Health, Safety, and
General Welfare of the People afforded by these Codes; and
WHEREAS, the general public served by these officials is often not clearly informed
of the activities necessary in administering the construction codes; and
WHEREAS, the failure of the general public to recognize the purpose of construction
codes adopted and administered by these Cities and Counties often serves
to impede the efforts of the Building Inspec'tion Departments; and
WHEREAS, public information about the activities of the Building Inspection Depart-
ments will serve not only to facilitate the work of these inspectors, but
also assist the Building Official in assuring protection of the Health,
Safety, and General Welfare of the General Public; and
WHEREAS, Rudy Perpich, Governor of the State of Minnesota, has proclaimed the
week of April 13 through April 19, 1986 to be Building Safety Week,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNC!L OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND,
MINNESOTA:
That the week of April 13 through April 19, 1986 be proclaimed
"Building Safety Week" in recognition of the Building Officials'
dedication and contribution to the communities they serve.
BILLS ,HARCH 25, 1986
Batch 864031
Batch 864032.
Computer Run dated 3/19/86
Computer Run dated 3/20/86
91,907.73
23,485.10
Total Bills
115,392.83
0
~m~
W
I--
bJ
Imm
I,,4
bJ
N
I
0
I
,,,t,
I
oC~
I I
4,,4'
I I
oo
w
W
~J
W
0
CI
W
.ii
W
I.I
,ir
I:
,(
Z
i,I td
ZZ
O0
WW
.JJ
WW
il,iii
n~
ILl
I,--
6.]
Z
Cc:
~J
A
I--
:3
4
c/'J
4
U
,II
~J
v
U
I
·
I
,11
Z
v
u
J
b.I
U
0
bi
Ld
bJ
0000
U
bJ
,,~
0
I-
U
I I I I I I I I I I
o0ooo0ooo0
I I I I I I I I I I
0000000000
W
.881
.J
41
41
,11
I
I
I
0
.j
I
I
i
0
0
!
h!
,Il
41
,Il
Oo
W
~.~.
LdW
t.,t IJ
&.. ~..
WWWWWW ~
N
I
0
~ UUL3 W .J Z
U
000
'. t I
I
I
· -4 ,.4
J
W
I I t
I I !
I ! I
Information for March 25, 1986 Council Meeting
March 19, 1986
LICENSE RENEWALS
Tree Removal - Expiring March 31, 1986.
Bear Tree Service
· Emery's Tree Service
Lutz Tree Service
New Applicants under Tree Removal~
Shorewood Tree Service
Sutherlands Tree Service
New License Period 4-1-86 to 3-31-87
Food Vendors - Hawker Permit License Period 4-1-86 to 3-31-87
Lynn Bandh - Mobile Ice Cream unit
5919 Hillcrest Rd.
Mound, Minn.
Blue Bell Ice Cream - Mobile Ice Cream Unit
Glenn Paul Baron
3218 Shelling Ave.
Mpls., Minn. 55406
Cigarette - License Period 3-1-86 to 2-28-87
Captain Billy's
New Applicant under Cigarette
Union'76 (formerly Quast Vending/Mobil)
Entertainment - License Period 2-1-86 to 1-31-87
Captain Billy's
Planning Commission Action
March 24, 1986
Re: Lost Lake
Jensen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to enclose the following
statement:
Neither the Planning Commission nor the City Council knows if our resi-
dential market will support commercial growth; the Planning Commission
and the City Council does not know if the commercial environment can
support additional retail space at this time. Neither the City Council
nor the Planning Commission has the expertise to obtain or analyze
market data; therefore, the Planning Commission makes the following
recommendation.
The vote on this motion was unanimously in favor.
Reese moved a motion to recommend the City Council empower the City Manager
and the City Planner to retain a suitable marketing analysis firm to advise
on the highest and best use of that property. Mindful of the fact that
Block Grant funds are available for this purpose.
Thal seconded the motion and the vote was unanimously in favor.
ITEM
h/
moved and' ~,~ ~ ~-~ ,
seconded a motion
The (Roll Call) vote was Unanimously/ ~ in favor with
ITEM ~_ ~ ·
nays.
seconded a motion
The (Roll Call) vote was unanimously/ ~ in favor with
ITEM ~ ~, . -.. -
~~~ .. moved and ~,~ _ seconded
The (Roll Call) vote was unanimously/ ~L~ in favor with
ITEM ~_ ~ ,.
moved and .~n~, ~-Q _ ~econded
~ ~/~. ~,. ~'~ ~. .
~ "~
. nays·
motion
· nays.
motion
vote was unanimously/ in favor wit nays.
ITEM
seconded a motion
The {Roll Call) vote was.unanimously/ ~O/n favor with.
ITEM t (~ .
nays.
seconded a motion
The (Roll Call} ~ote was unanimously/~in favor with
ITEM # ~ ' -
nays.
moved and
seconded a motion
The {Roll Call) vote was unanimously/ ~in favor with
ITEM # ~.
nays.
moved and
seconded a motion
ITEM
The (Roll Call) vote was unanimously/..~n favor with
ITEM ~ ~ ·
nays.
moved and _
_ seconded a motion
The {Roll Call) vote was unanimously/O.~.~ in favor with . nays.
~~~-h moved and '~j~~.~w~ _ seconded a motion
~.~ /'~ ~ ,~0 ~_~a. , ' . .
Th~ (~oll call) vot~ was uoaoim faro .
ITEM ~' ·
v~ ~l C~ll) vote ~as unsnimo~slY/ ~.in favor ~ith ., nays.
ITEM
seconded
a motion
The (Roll Call) vote was.unanimously/~in
favor
with
ITEM ~
nays.
.... moved-.and ...
seconded a motion
T~e..(Roll Call) ~ote was unanimously/ in favor with. nays.
ITEM
° moved and
seconded a motion
in favor with nays.
The (Roll Call) vote was unanimously/'
ITEM #,
moved and
:
seconded a motion
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-115,5
TO: ED SHUKLE
FROM: JOHN NORMAN
FINANCE DIRECTOR
RE:
FEBRUARY 1986 FINANCIAL REPORT
The first installments of insurance premiums through the League were
paid during February - $20,184 for Package Coverage (including auto-
mobile) and $21,294 for Workmans Compensation. These amounts were
allocated to the various funds and departments and account for the
overrun of accounts 4360 and 4361.
Three budgets exceeded 20% of their yearly budget:
Council - 22.4% of budget
Overdue to payments for annual conference
Streets - 20.4% of budget
Equipment parts and equipment repair exceed 60% of total
budget. Other factors of overrun include street maintenance
materials and insurance costs.
Water Fund - 21.4% of budget
$10,800 was spent to repair well #7, this was coded to
account 4380 - total budget was $25,000, expenses through
February were $21,~00.
Other factors of overrun include supplies for watermain
breaks and insurance costs
An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race. color, national origin, or handicapped status
in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in. its programs and activities.
cITY OF MOUND·
1986 BUDGET REPORT
REVENUES
FEBRUARY 1986
BUDGET
FEBRUARY
REVENUE
YTD
REVENUE
VARIANCE
PER CENT
RECEIVED
GENERAL FUND
Taxes $
Intergovernmental
Business. Licenses
Non-Business Licenses
& Permits
General Gov't Charges
Court Fines
Charges to other
Departments
Other Revenue
TOTAL REVENUE
931,061
719,964
13,060
114,ooo
27,750
82,000
23,000
55,300
$1,966,135
4,668
0
741
18,714
1,025
0
1,948
682
27,778
4,668
6,875
930
29,224
1,884
0
5,288
1,247
50,116
926,393
713,089
12,130
84,776
25,866
82,000
17,712
54,053
· 1 ,'916,019.
.5
1.0
7.1
25.6
6.8
0
23.0
2.3
2.5,
Federal Revenue Sharing
Liquor Fund'
WaEer Fund
Sewer Fund
45,000
820,000
264,000
5OO,OOO
0
42,815
21,795
47,732
0
95,369
41,392
95,536
45,000
724,631
222,608
404,464
0
'11.6
15.7
19.1
1986 BUDGET REPORT
EXPENDITURES
FEBRUARY 1986
BUDGET
February
EXPENSE
EXPENSE
UNEN-
BALANCE
EXPEXOED
GENEFLAL FUND
Council $ 36,964
City-.Manager/Clerk 89,273
Elections & Reg. 10,307
Assessing 43,369
Finance 141,420
Legal 80,330
Cable T.V. '-''
Contel 20,000
Recycling 18,585
Police Protection :567,599.
Planning & Insp. 100,333
Civil Defense 3,000
Streets 369,950
Shop & Store 47,096
City Property' 83,449
Parks 130,O93
Contingency 50,000
Transfers 75,741
2,920
7,721
97
1 505
11,740
2,909
2O
O
1,019
48,686
11,8o8
96
41,759
4,751
~,136
2,319
0
6,312
8,274
1.3,620
98
1,793
21,891
6,239
54
o
1,998
89,044
17,542
193
75,621
7,955
5,783
9,631
0
12,624
28,690
75,653
lO,2O9
41,576
119,529
74,o91
(54)
20,000
16,587
478,555
82,791
2,807
294,329
39,141
77,.666
120,462
50,000
63,117
22.4
15.3
.9
4.1
t5.5
7.8
10.8
15.7
17.5
6.4
20.4.
16.9
6.9
7.4
16.7
GENERAL FUND TOTAL $~[867,509
Federal Reserve Sharing 52,000
CDBG ---
Area Fire Service 142,802
Sealcoat Program ---
CBD Assessment ---
Town Square TIF ---
Liquor 153 ,450
Water 315,O22
Sewer. 631,O84
Cemetery 3,896
1'-47,798'
1,935
11,796
11,392
3,720
11,894
42,215
47,464
72
272,360
3,612'
1,935'
22,574
13,169
6,877
19,560
67,390
91,822
72
1,595,149
48,388
(1,935)
12o,228
(13,169)
(6,877)
133,890
247,632
539,262
3,824
14.6
6.9
12.7
21.4
14.5
1.9
1986
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
Honorable Rudy Perpich
Governor of liinnesota
State Capitol
St. Paul., lin 55155
Dear Governor Perpich:
Due to the House of Representatives adjourning liarch 18 and not
passing a tax and budget bill, the cities of liinnesota are very
concerned about Local Government Aid cuts for 1986 and no aid
proposed for 1987. This would be devastating for cities and tax-
payers. You must work with the Legislature in getting a bill passed
and signed.
As I see it, you have two options:
" -' - 1. Call a special legislative session.
or
2. Use existing powers to balance the budget through
the suspension of income tax indexing and the
unaliotment of appropriations.
In my opinion, #1 above is the acceptable solution. We ask that
you call a special session before Easter to deal with the tax and
budget bill crisis. The ]egislature must pass a tax bill to prevent
cuts in Loca] Government Aid for 1956 and to continue aid in 1987.
Please honor our request.
City lianagi~r~
CC:
Senator Gen 01son
Representative John Burger
Jim Miller, President LMC
Don Slater, Executive Director, LMC
ES:Is
An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status
in the admission or access to. or treatment or employment in. its oroorams end activitiA~
league of minmesota cities
STATE BUDGET IN TURMOIL
The Minnesota House of Representatives adjourned March 18 without acting on the tax or
budget bills. If Governor Perpich does not call a special legislative session cities
will be faced with very deep cuts in 1986 and will have no local government aid in
1987. This would be devasting for cities and taxpayers. City officials must urge the
Legislature and the Governor to work together to resolve this situation through a
special session.
There seems a very real possibility that the impasse between all of the parties (House
of Representatives, Senate, and the Governor) could be resolved on the backs of cities
and the local property taxpayers.
The conference committee had completed its work on the tax bill and the compromise was
ready to be acted upon when the House adjourned. Failure to pass that tax bill and the
lack of agreement on the budget bill leaves cities in a very difficult situation. The
governor has two options: to call a special legislative session or use his existing
powers to balance the budget through the suspension of income tax indexing and the
unallotment of appropriations. Unallotment means that the Governor would cut
appropriations from the levels the Legislature approved last spring. Should the
Governor decide to unallot, cities would likely face very large cuts in homestead
credit and local government aid. These cuts could be much larger than the nine percent
cuts he recommended in January because he cannot suspend fund transfers or implement
some other components of his original proposal.
Worse yet, if there is no special session, there will be no local government aid for
1987. The Legislature must approve an appropriation and adopt a formula if LGA is to
continue. Without the $300 million £n LGA support cities would need to make dramatic
and disastrous levy increases this fall.
The League does not consider unallotment to be a reasonable response to the budget
problem. The Legislature should pass.the tax bill and resolve the other budget bills.
Ail parties to the dispute should work together to produce this result. It is in
cities best interests that this be quickly resolved. The governor should call a
special session before Easter.
CITY OFFICIALS SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE GOVERNOR AND THEIR REPRESENTATIVES AND
SENATORS AND SAY:
That unallotment by the Governor is not an acceptable solution.
The Legislature must pass a tax bill to continue local government aid in 1987.
The Governor should call a special session prior to Easter.
Please call today ... your calls and letters do make a difference.
I 8,3 u~rxiv'~x~'~:-.~cV avenu~e east, st. paul, m~. ne?z'ota 551 0'1 (IBfl 2) 227-_5600
March 17, 1986
Mound Police Chief
Mound PoliCe Department
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Re-
Sar~eant Brad Roy'and Officer
Gary Lotten
Dear Sir:
· I would like to thank the Mound Police Department, Sargeant
Roy and Officer Lotten for their performance on Sunday, March
9, 1986. The Mound Police Department was called by a neighbor
at approximately 12:15 a.m. with a report of breaking glass.
Although the officers did not know where the sound was coming
from, they cruised the neighborhood until they came across my
house with the front windows broken out.
I want to let the officers involved know how grateful
I am that they were there and how they handled the situation.
My son had a friend spending the night while I was away for the
evening in Elk River. Officer Lotten first contacted me at approximately
.12:.45 a.m. on Sunday morning. I, of course, was shocked to be
getting a.phone call from the Mound Police. He informed me that
all of my front windows had been broken out and my living room
was really a mess. He suggested that I 'return home as soon as
possible and try to get the windows boarded up. I told him that
I would return home right away. .I then called home to talk to
my son and also spoke with Sargeant Roy, who was very helpful
and tried to fill me in on what had happened.
The officers were very helpful to my son in this difficult
situation and suggested that he turn up the heat so the pipes
wouldn't freeze and so the house woUldn't become too cold.
The boy who caused the damage was taken care of and
transported to Hennepin County Medical Center. He is currently
in the University of Minnesota Psychiatric Ward. His parents
have been very cooperative in taking care of the damaged windows
and other personal belongings. I know that they appreciate the
help the officers gave their son as well.
I just wanted to extend my thanks to the officers as
often I am sure police only receive derogatory comments. Thank
you for being there when you were needed and for being understanding
and cooperative.
Sincerely,
Anne Bitn~
2156 Centerview Lane
Mound, MN 55364