The URL can be used to link to this page

86-09-30 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Approve Minutes - September 10, 1986, Special Meeting Approve Minutes - September 16, 1986, Regular Meeting ~ Delinquent Utility Bills ~ Consideration of Subdivision of Land at 46XX Lakeside Lane, PID #18-117-23 32 0015/0016 Proposed Easement Vacation for Lot 2, Block 15, Devon, PID #25-117-24 11 0047 Proposed Assessments as follows: CBD Parking Maintenance Assessment - Levy 10281 Unpaid Tree Removal Assessment - Levy 10278 Unpaid Clean-Up Assessment - Levy 10279 Delinquent Utility Bills - Levy 10280 Unpaid Capping of Sewer Line - Levy 10282 Sanitary Sewer & Water Extension - Levy 10283 Boarding. Up Hazardous Structure - Levy 10286 Weed & Grass Cutting Charges - Levy 10287 A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 6. Resolutions Levying A. Levy 10284 B. Levy 10285 7. ' Pg. 1958-1959 Pg. 1960-1966 Pg. 1967-1968 Pg. 1969-1981 Pg. 1982-1992 Pg. 1993-1995 Pg. 1996-1997 Pg. 1998-1999 Pg. 2000-2001 Pg. 2002-2003 Pg. 2004-2005 Pg. 2006-2007 Pg. 2008-2009 Deferred & Supplemental Assessments: Pg. 2010-2011 Pg. 2012-2013 Leroy Luedke, 5421Tonkawood Road PID #13-117-24 32 0001 Front Yard Setback Variance Pg. 2014-2025 Page 1955 Bradley & Janice M. Bristol, 1559 Bluebird Lane, Lots 8 & 19 Block 6, Woodland Point, PID #12-117-24 43 0040/ 0050 10. Reschedule First Regular Council Meeting in November due to Legal Holiday (Veteran,s Day) ~UGGESTED DATE: Wednesday, November 12, 1986 11. Approval of Specifications and Setting of Bid Openeing Date for Fire/Rescue Apparatus and Equipment SUGGESTED DATE: October 30, 1986, 10:00 A.M. REQUEST: Variance Request - Existing Nonconforming Structure & Deck Pg. 2026-2033 Final Payment Request - Bartlett Blvd. Project - Buffalo Bituminous - $2,814.59. Pg. 2034-2037 Pg. 2038-2049 12. Request from Charles Weed, 600 North Lilac, Golden Valley RE: Moving house into City of Mound 13. Request for Street Light on Canary Lane 14. Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present 15. License Renewai& New License Application: Set-Up - Mound Lanes Pool Table - Donnies on the Lake 16. Payment of Bills 15. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOU~ A. Recycling Flier that was included in the September 23, 1986, Laker regarding the City of Mound,s Recycling Program B. Planning Commission Minutes - September 8, 1986 C. August 1986 Monthly Financial Report as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director D. Notice on the League of Minnesota Cities Annual Policy Adoption Meeting to be held November 20, 1986, in St. Paul. Please advise if you want to attend. E. John Norman and I attended a Meeting this week concerning the Joint Metropolitan Council - Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) "Study of Sewer Service Available Charges (SAC),, and MWCC,s "Study of Sewer Service Availability Charge (SAC) Refund". Pg. 2048-2049 Pg. 2050-2053 Pg. 2054-2055 Pg. 2056-2072 Pg. 2073-2074 Pg. 2075-2078 Pg. 2079-2081 Pg. 2082-2083 Page 1956 Fe The studies reviewed and made recommendations on: (1)The long term (25 years) and short term (10 years) need to increase the SAC rate; (2)Possible changes in the policy for the collection of SAC; and (3)Possible refund of SAC to communities. MWCC will be reviewing the studies and will be implementing recommendations of these studies at its 10/12/86 meeting. Attached is the SAC Charge Study for your information. The second study, the "Refund" study, does not affect Mound because we are totally sewered. This refund pertains to other communities who charged SAC to properties which do not have sewer at this point in time. If you are interested in looking at this report, I can provide a copy for you. ~ Special Council Meetings: Tuesday - September 30, 1986 at 5:30 P.M. and Wednesday - October 1, 1986 at 6:00 P.M. to discuss the 1987 Proposed Budget Pg. 20 84-20 96 Mark Wednesday, October 8, 1986, 7:30 P.M., City Hall, on your calendar. We have scheduled a meeting with Maxfield Research Group to review the draft report of the market analysis on Lost Lake. The meeting notice will be placed in The Laker and interested persons will be invited to attend. We would specifically like the Planning Commission and City Council to attend. We will not request any action on the report as there will probably be some suggestions and comments that may have to be added to the report or will require further investigation. Draft report will be sent out next week. H, Breakfact with the Chairperson of the Metro Council will be held Wednesday, October 8, 1986 at the Hopkins House, 7:30 A.M. Please advise if you are interested in attending. State of the region matter will be discussed. Page 1957 ~36 September 10, 1986 MINUTES- MOUND CITY COUNCIL- SPECIAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Wednesday, September 10, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City, discuss the Continental Telephone issue. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Phyll. is Jessen, Gary Paulsen, Russ Peterson and Steve Smith. Also present were: City Manager, Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorneys Curt Pearson and Jim Larson, City Rate Analyst Derick Dahlen and the following interested citizens: John Wilsey, Skip Johnson, Dick Schwert, Jerry Longpre, John Thorsen, Fred Wolf, Lee Greenslit, Liz Jensen, Jerry Smith, Bob Bittle, Aaron Applequist, Contel Representatives: Gary Haugen, Milt Seaman, Harlan Brue, Marry Weinstein, Cheryl Grand. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed %he people in attendance. The City Attorney reported that since %he Council's last meeting, Mr. Dahlen met with Contel and received the answers to his questions. Mr. Dahlen's findings and projections were then passed out to %he Council and the public. The Mayor stated that the scope of Mr. Dahlen's study was basically to find out if it would be financially feasible for the City to operate a telephone company. Mr. Dahlen then reported that his projections for the reduction in debt service would be either close or a loss. There would be a minimal reduction in current rates, up to $3.43 per month. The Mayor opened %he .public hearing. The following people had statements or questions for the Council: John Wilsey, Skip Johnson, Dick Schwert, John Thorsen, Fred Wolf,' Lee Greenslit, Jerry Longpre, Liz Jensen, Jerry Smith, Bob Bittle, Aaron Applequist. The Mayor closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Polston, seconded by Jessen that the City not proceed with an election regarding a condemnation of the Continental Telephone System at the General Election in November. Further moving that this Council recommends to future Councils of %his City that they review with great dilegence any further increase in telephone rates in the City. This Council stongly believes that the telephone rates in Mound are extremely high in relation to rates charged by 137 September 10, 1986 Northwestern Bell ~n adjoining communities. The vote was unanimously in favor. Hot/on carried. HOTZON made by Paul~en, seconded by Je~sen to adjourn at 9:20 P.H. The vote was unanimously tn Favor. Hot/on carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk 138 September 16, 1956 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin CountY, Minnesota, met in September 16, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. in regular session on Tuesday, · the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen, Russ Peterson and Steve Smith. Al.so present were: Ci%2 Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr,, Ci%2 Clerk Fran Clark, City A~orney Cur~ Pearson, Ci%2 Engineer John Cameron, Ci%2 Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Finance Director John Norman, and ~he following interested citizens: Nick Scheuer, Reuben Hat,man, Cleo Hat%man, Rich Lebra, Chert21 Lebra, Klm Yilek, M. Hoag, RoY Wes%ergaard' James & Ri%a Ziehwein, Clara Paz, Nancy Clough, Duane Bar%h, Jun Nelson, Run McCombs, Gordon Swenson, Herb Wolner, Jim Bedell, Glenn Rogers, Ned & Karen Podan2, Harold Meeker, Frank Ahrens, Randy Bickmann. The Mayor opened %he meeting and welcomed the people in a~%endance- The Minutes of the August 26, 1986, Regular Meeting were presented for consideration- Peterson, seconded by Smith to approve the HOTION made by · Regular Meeting, as Minutes of the August 26, 19.86, ~_ ~_ favor. Motion presented. The vote was unanxmousAY Au The City Planner reviewed his memo of September 9, 1986, relating to how other communities (Tonka Bay, Shorewood, White Bear Lake, Wayzata, Chanhassen, Orono and Minnetrista) regulate exterior storage · lowing people gave their views and understanding of the The fol . _~o_ted: Harold Meeker, Jim Bedell, Run nt as it was au ~ amendme .......... d Frank Ahrens, Clara Paz, Mike Scheuer, s KOy wesDer~ , McComb , .~.. Rnm rs. Nancy Clough. Jun Nelson, G~=,,, .... ce_ . The Council discussed the concerns and explained differences between the old ordinance and the amendment that was approved. MOTION made by Smith, seconded bY Polston to leave the ordinance amendment as is and have the Staff conduct a survey of how many residents are being affected and the impacts on 139 September 16, 1986 them· This data to be brought back to the City Council In May off 1987. The Vote wa8 four In favor w/th Peterson voting nay. Mot/on tattled. After discussion by the Council, Planner, Englneer and Developer, the following items were added to the resolution of approval: Creative Developers, Inc. was changed to ~6 Escrow fund was increased from $2,500.00. 3. #13 - Added Ashco. $1,500.00 to to this item "(175 feet easterly of Highland Blvd.) Said easement shall allow steps to the lake not to exceed 4 feet in width. Add #14 - "The existing structure located on Lots 2, 3 & 4 (of the new plat) shall be:removed on or before May 1987, or the City shall have the right to have this structure removed at the subdividers expense under the bond established in paragraph #3. Prior to removal of the building, no Building Permits shall be issued on Lots 2, 3, and 4 of the new plat· Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-109 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF COBBLESTONE COVE (FORMERLy KNOWN AS CO0 BAY ESTATES) PID KS PART , ~23-117-24 41 001 OF BLOCK - SUMMER AS~EMBLY~ 1, MINNESOTA BAPTIST The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The Building Official explained the Planning Commission,s recommendations as stated in the proposed resolution on page 1837 of the Council Packet· Mr. Podany was present and stated that he. would like to have condition #1 in the proposed resolution deleted so that the roof line of the garage would not have to be separated to allow 2 feet between the detached accessory buildings. The Council agreed to the deletion of ~1 of the conditions in the proposed resolution. - 138 September 16, 19B6 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING SEPTEI~IBER 16, 1986 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, September 16, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen, Russ Peterson and Steve Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, City Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Finance Director John Norman, and the following interested citizens: Nick Scheuer, Reuben Hartman, Cleo Hartman, Rich Lebra, Cherryl Lebra, Kim Yilek, M. Hoag, Roy Westergaard, James &Rita Ziehwein, Clara Paz, Nancy Clough, Duane Barth, Jon Nelson, Ron McCombs, Gordon Swenson, Herb Wolner, Jim Bedell, Harold Meeker, Frank Ahrens, Glenn Rogers, Ned & Karen Podany, Randy Bickmann. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Minutes of the August 26, 1 TM , Regular Meeting were presented for consideration. MOTION made by Peterson, seconded by Smith to approve the Minutes of'the August 26, 1986, Regular Meeting, as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Planner revi'ewed his memo of September 9, 1986, relating to how other communities (Tonka Bay, Shorewood, White Bear Lake, Wayzata, Chanhassen, Orono and Minnetrista) regulate exterior storage. The following people gave their views and understanding of the amendment as it was adopted: Harold Meeker, Jim Bedell, Ron McCombs, Roy Westergaard, Frank Ahrens, Clara Paz, Mike Scheuer, Jon Nelson, Glenn Rogers, Nancy Clough. The Council discussed the concerns and explained differences between the old ordinance and the amendment that was approved. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Polston to leave the ordinance amendment as is, but not enforce it, and have the Staff conduct a survey of how many residents are being 139 .September 16, 1986 affected and the impacts on them. This data to be brought back to the City Council In May of 1987. The vote was four in Favor with Peterson voting nay. Motion carried. After discussion by the Council, Planner, Engineer and_Developer, the following items were added to the resolution of approval: 1. Creative Developers, Inc. was changed to Ashco. 2. #6 Escrow fund was increased from $1,500.00 to $2,500.00. 3. ~13 - Added to this item "(175 feet easterly of Highland Blvd.) Said easement shall allow steps to the lake not to exceed q feet in width. . Add #lq - "The existing structure located on Lots 2, 3 & q (of the new plat) shall be removed on or before May 1, 1987, or the City shall have the right to have this structure removed at the subdividers expense under the bond established in paragraph #3. Prior to removal of the building, no Building Permits shall be issued on Lots 2, 3, and ~ of the new plat. Paul sen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: ' RESOLUTION ~86-109 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF COBBLESTONE COVE (FORMERLY KNOWN AS COOKS BAY ESTATES), PID #23-117-24 41 oo17, PART OF BLOCK 1, "MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY" The vote was unanimously in favor. Hotion carried. EXISTING DETACHED GARAGF . The Building Official explained the Planning Commission,s recommendations as stated in the proposed resolution on page 1837 of the Council Packet. Mr. Podany was present and stated that he would like to have condition #1 in the proposed resolution deleted so that the roof line of the garage would not have to be separated to allow 2 feet between the detached accessory buildings. The Council agreed to the deletion of tl of the conditions in the proposed resolution. 140 September 16, 1986 Polston moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #86-110 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A SIDE YARD SETBACK YARIANCE FOR AN EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE, LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 17, THE ltlGHLANDS, PID ~23-117-24 34 0067 (6165/67 SINCLAIR ROAD) p & Z CASE #86-535 eterson seconded the following amendment .to Jesse_n moved an_d_ P . e. t the driveway area b.e confi_ned to the above resolution~._ T~h~a_'~ Be not use the park property _as u~. Podany*s proper~y, ~.u?_,. - ---~ ..- +~e ~ark property be ~-~- of his driveway and t~e grav.~ ~,, ~._'_ ~; ~. favor with ~oved~. The vote on the amenamen~ ~ . -~ Smith voting naY. Motion carried. Ms. Hoag then asked for a date for the completion of the garage moving. The Council discussed a completion date. Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following amendment to the oriElnal resolution: eGarage to be moved by November ~§, ~986.. The vote on this amendment was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The vote on Resolution #86-110 as amended was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~ODE SECTION 2~-~O~ The Building Official explained that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this variance on the condition that Mr. Wolner combine Lots 2 & 3 as one tax parcel. Paulsen moved .and .Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #86-111 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNI~G COMMISSION TO APPROVE VARIANCE TO ZONING CODE SECTION 23.407 FOR LOT 2, SHIRLE~ HILLS UNIT G, PID #24-117-24 24 0017 (P & Z CASE #86-536 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Engineer explained that a grading permit was given last Fall for the old Metro 500 site but that the present grading did not follow that plan and the ordinance requires that any grading over 1000 yards needs Council approval. September 16, 1986 Mr. Mark Lundgren, Balboa Corporation, stated that the plan is Just to finish grade the site and seed for erosion control. MOTION made by Peterson, seconded by Smith to issue a Gradin& Permit to Balboa Corporation as per the lan the City Engineer,s ..... P _. submitted and cfi Se tember a_ moRrAee°m~m~e_nda_t,lv"° (1 ~nru. b7 ~n his letter Notio~ earr2ed~' '~''' -ut vote was unanimously in flavor. NOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jessen to--approve Payment Request #3, flrom Preflerred Paving in the amount cfi $79,801.q3, flor the Lynwood Blvd. & Tuxedo Blvd. Project. The vote was unanimously In flavor. Notion carried. Smith moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION t86-112 RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AND CERTIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Attorney gave the background of this item and stated that they have agreed to settle for $7,500. Smith moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #86-1i3 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A RELEASE IN THE CASE OF MOUND ¥. SANDER AND COMPANY, INC. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. There were no comments or suggestions from citizens present. The City Manager presented his proposed checklist for the referendum. September 16, 1986 There was considerable discussion by the Council on the pros and cons of the City Hall site and the Westedge Blvd. site. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Polston to adopt the checklist (10 items) as presented and specify the Westedge Blvd. site for the new Public Works facility. MOTION made by Peterson, seconded by Paulsen to amend the above by deleting the site for the new Public Works Facility from the motion. A roll call vote was 2 .in favor with Jessen, Polston and Smith voting nay. Motion failed. Roll call vote in the original motion was ~ in favor with Paulsen voting nay. Motion carried. BUILDING - ~516 LYNWOOD BLVD. Peterson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-114 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF UNSANITARY, UNSAFE, AND HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS EXISTING AT 5516 LYNWOOD BLVD. IN THE CITY OF MOUND AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER AN ORDER WITH RESPECT TO THIS HAZARDOUS AND DANGEROUS BUILDING The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager highlighted the 1987 Budget for the Council. The Council set September 30, 1986, at 5:30 P.M. (before the Council Meeting), and October 1, 1986, at 6:00 P.M. as dates to meet with the Department Heads regarding the 1987 Budget. pAYMENT OF BILLS The bills were presented for consideration. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Paulsen to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $231,928.16, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Wednesday, October 8, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. _ Maxfield Research Group will review draft report of the market analysis on Lost Lake. /f~Y September 16, 1986 B. Letter and information from Hennepin County Parks on a boat tour of Lake Mlnnetonka at 10:00 A.M., Saturday, September 20, 1986, A1 & Alma,s. Planning Commission Minutes of August 25, 1986. August 1986 Monthly Reports as prepared by Department Heads.. MOTION made by Peterson, seconded by Polston to adjourn at 11:20 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk BILLS ......... SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 Batch 864083 Batch 864084 Computer Run dated 9/3/86 Computer Run dated 9/11/86 43,184.25 108'942.48 152,126.73 Preferred Paving Pymt Request #3 79,801.43 Total Bills 231,928.16 Delinquent Water and Sewer 9-24-86 42 404"5241 91 42 343 2281 81 42 361 2346 11 22 232 2301 32 22 23Z 2370 81 22~235 2401 41 22 238 4860 32 22 238 4875 12 22 238 4925 42 22 238.5005 43 22 238 5020 31 22 238 5024 52 22 250 2142 31 22 259 4841 92 22 259 4949 O1 22 259 6339 22 22 259 6549 61 22 259 6557 91 22 259 6609 81 22 280 5883 61 22 283 5910 11 22 286 5915 32 22 286 6056 52 22 292 6033 21 22 298 2965 62 22 307 6177 31 22 310 2630 91 22 310 3198 61 22 310 6211 41 22 316 2820 31 22 318 2871 21 $1128.90 138.83 299.15 77.03 5o.oo 82.59 121.64 81.91 134.63 188.63 78.48 182.06 205.93 89.30 69.94 86.91 79.39 113.02 145.97 62.94 134.87 76.04 90.05 74.96 1 ~2.98 112.93 144.22 75.87 118.66 96.82 180.68 Delinquent Water and Sewer 9-24-86 '42 404~5241 91 42 343 2281 81 42 361 2346 11 22 232 2301 32 22 232 2370 81 22~]35 2401 41 2,2 238 4860 32 22 238 4875 12 22 238 4925 42 22 238.5005 43 22 238 5O20 31 22 238 5024 52 22 250 214231 22 259 4841 92 22 259 4949 O1 22 259 6339 22 22 259 6549 61 22 ~59 6557 91 22 259 6609 81 22 280 5883 61 22 283 5910 11 22 286 5915 32 22 286 6056 52 22 292 6O33 21 22 298 2965 62 22 307 6177 31 22 310 2630 91 22 310 3198 61 22 310 6211 41 22 316 2820 31 22 3t8 287i 21 Captain Billys John Royer Charles Carlson Thomas Simon Fay Cooper Zeb Hanson Peter Charles Anthony Brinatte Brenda Olson Frank Mittelsteadt Elma Jensen Geo Mach Jim Anderst ~ames Morgan" H.G.Miller Doris Ferrill Thomas Lavolie Michael Malaske Richard Otexa Donald Horner Jeffrey Stevens Tim Bell Jo Etta Roehl Todd Warner Ron Anderson Ned,,Podany W.J. Lang June Mc Carthy Tim Mehner Eric Reinhart Michael Beinert Paid Paid Paid $25.00 Paid Paid Paid $1128.90 138.83 299.15 77.03 5o.oo 82.59 121.64 81.91 134163 188.63 78.48 182 O6 2O5 93 ~9 30 69 94 86 91 79 39 113.02 145.97 62.94 134.87 76.04 9O.O5 74.96 1~2~98 112.93 144.22 75.87 118.66 96.82 180.68 5241 Shoreline Blvd. 2281Conunerce Blvd. 2346 Cypress Rd. 2301Fairview Ln. 2370 Fairview Lane 2401 Chateau 4860 Edgewater Dr. 4875 Edgewater Dr. 4925 Edgewater Dr. 5005 Edgewater Dr. 5020 Edgewater Dr. 5024 Edgewater Dr. 2142 Sandy Ln. 4841 Bartlett Blvd. 4949 Bartlett Blvd. 6339 Bartlett Blvd. 6549 Bartlett Blvd. 6557 Bartlett Blvd. 6609 Bartlett Blvd. 5883 Idlewood Rd. 5910 Ridgewood Rd. 5915 Hawthorne Rd. 6056 Hawthorne Rd. 6033 Cherrywood Ln. 2965 Oaklawn Ln. 6177 Sinclair Rd. 2630 Westedge Blvd. 3198 Westedge Blvd. 6211Westedge Blvd. 2820 Halstead Ln. 2871 Pheasant Ln. 22 320 3019 31 22 324 2611.01 22 343 2420 6~ 22 346 5667 21 22 367 5273 51 22 373 5001 82 22 388 5061 01, Gerald Crowell Doug Eaton Edward Bolling Joan Snow Robert Brown Stann & Sorens Steve Arne Randall Giese Paid $ 179.52 72.17 14o.76 140.41 187.21 134.27 186.39 125.04 3019 Bluffs Ln. 2611 Setter Circle 2400 Commerce Blvd. 2420 Commerce Blvd. 5667 Bush Rd. 5273 Eden Rd. 5001Woodridge Rd. 5061 Avon Dr. $5791.1~ ~76.60 ,T 22 320 3019 31 22 324 2611 O1 22 343 2400 83 22 343 2420 63 22 346 5667 21 22 367 5273 51 22 373 5001 82 22 388 5061 01, $ 179.52 72.17 140.76 140.41 187.21 134.27 186.39 125.04 $5791.1~ CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota CASE NO. 86-541 & 86-542 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there will be a public hearing at the City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, the 30th day of September, 1986, to con~ider the subdivision of land located at 46XX Lakeside Lane, PID Numbers 18-117-23 32 O016 and 18-117-23 32 O015 described as: Lots 1 to 6, inclusive, including vacated Ivy Lane, Block 10 and Lot 3, Block 9, all in Shadywood Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk' 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Commission and Staff_j/ FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: August 27, 1986 S~BJECT: Preliminary Plat and Variance - Shadywood Point Second Addition CASE NO: 86-541 and 86-542 VHS ~ NO.: 86-310-A17-Z0 APPLICANT: Tom Ess Lot 3, Block 9 and Lots 1-6, Block 10 and Vacated Ivy Lane, Shadywood Point. EXISTING ZONING: Single Family Residential (R-l) GOMPREHERSIVEPI2LN: Residential BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide Lots 1-6, Block 10, Shadywood Point into. two new lots labeled Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Shadywood Point Second Addftion. Additionally, lot width variances have been requested since neither of the proposed lots meet the required width of 60 feet at the building setback llne. The proposed plat also includes Lot 3, Block 9, Shadywood Point. Prior to reviewing details of the two new proposed lots, it's necessary to review Lot 3, Block 9. Lot 3 was owned by the applicant, Mr. Ess until it was sold to another party on a contract for deed. At the time of the sale, Mr. Ess did not include the vacated eastern half of Ivy Lane. The title for this portion of Ivy Lane reportedly was transferred to the land area which contains the proposed lots. To date, the City has not been notified by the County that the transfer has occurred. The vacated eastern half of Ivy Lane is important because it's transfer does two things.: First, it provides additional land area for access to the two new lots and secondly, it makes Lot 3 nonconforming due to width (50 feet versus 60 feet). As you probably recall, the Planning Commission and City Council reviewed the Shadywood Point area in September of 1985 to determine if it was appropriate to rezone the area from R-1 to R-2. The report at that time noted that almost 60% of the ~arcels in the Shadywood Point area were nonconforming and most of them were due to lot width. Reduction of the width of Lot 3 from 60 feet to 50 feet is not inconsistent with the overall area. The 50 foot width may be a factor in the future, however, if the owner of Lot 3 decides to construct a garage. The location for such a structure may be limited to the front yard area. The vacated eastern half of Ivy Lane is critical to the development of proposed Lots 1 and 2. Without the eastern portion of the vacated right-of-way, the access to both lots would only be 11-12 feet wide. The proposed lots meet all the requirements of the Mound Zoning Code except lot width at the building setback line. Lot 1 contains 13,600 square feet and Lot 2 contains 31,800 square feet.' Since the property has extremely limited footage along Lakeside Road, proposed property lines are adjusted to provide each lot with approximately 12 feet of direct connection to the right-of-way. The site plan indicates that this area will contain a 17 foot wide driveway which will be used by both parties. Presumably, this will require an easement over both lots for driveway access purposes. . Rec~tion: The proposed plan appears to be a resonable use for a vacant parcel which contains obvious access restrictions. Staff has some concern about the reduction in width of Lot 3 from 60 feet to 50 feet, particularly in light of possible future driveway and garage construction. The inclusion of all of the vacated Ivy Lane with the proposed lots is the only way to provide adequate access short of the applicant being able to acquire land from the owner of Lot 7, Block 10. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recognize a lot width variance for Lot 3, Block .9 and approve the preliminary plat and lot width variances for Lots 1 and 2, Shadywood Point Second Addition subject to the following conditions: Setbacks for Lot 1 shall be at least 27.5' to. the front lot line (northwest), 10' on each side yard and at least 50' to the lakeshore. Setbacks for Lot 2 shall be at least 29' to the front lot line (northwest), 10' to the side yard and at least 50' to the lakeshore. Utility and grading plans shall be reviewed andapprovedbythe City Engineer. The City Attorney shall review and approve the easement agreement for the com~ driveway and property title. Since the project involves filling below the 931.5 elevation, grading, drainage, and erosion control plans shall be reviewed and approved by the watershed district and all other applicable agencies. Park dedication fees shall be collected for Lots 1 and 2 consistent with current charges for minor subdivisions. I¢?1 Planning Commission H~nutes September 8, 1986 1. Cases.No. 86-$41 & 86-542 Public Hearing on Subdivision of Land and Variance for q6XX Lakeside Lane; Lots 1 to 6, Inclusive, lncludlng vacated Ivy Lane, Block 10; and Lot 3, Block 9, all In Shadywood Point- Tom and Judy Ess, Richard Sathre of Sathre-Sergquist, Inc. and 0an Nartin were present. Park Koegler, City' Planner, revleved his reFort Stating proposal Is to divide Lots 1 and 6, Block 10, Shady~oo:J Point and all of vacated Ivy Lane Into two buildlng sites. Lots meet all the Zoning .Code requirements except the.60 foot minimum lot width at'the bullding line. Transfer of Lot 3 without the eastern po~tlon of vacated Ivy Lane causes that parcel to need a lot width variance also. Without the vacated eastern half of ivy Lane, the access to proposed Lots 1 and 2 would only be 11-12 feet wlde. He Is recommending approval'of the'prel:iml~ary plat and lot width varlances with certain condi- tions. Jan Bertrand, Bullding Official, reviewed the Englneer~s report which comments on Grading & Drainage Plan (a low area near proposed driveway should be filled and this would need permission from the Owner of Lot 7); Prelimlnary Plan and Utlllty Plan an'd the deficient unit charges and his recommendations. The Buildlng Offlclal clarifled that this public hearing was for both preliminary and final plat approval so appllcant would not have to go through twice. The Chair opened the public hearing and the following persons had comments: NANCY SCHROEDER, ovmer of Lot 2, Block 9, Shady~ood Point, stated she wanted it known that there ls no access to benefit Lot 3 across her lot; she is cur- rently marketing the lot and sees no way for an easement to be allowed. RICH SATHRE of Sathre Bergquist stated his. CQmpany is helping Ess plat the prop- erty. He had drawing of lots.and stated there is 11 feet from house on Lot 3 to lot line of Lot 2; one could get around to a garage site on lakeside, but house ls not set back far enough to bui'ld a garage on the street side. What they are trying to'do Is create a shared area of two lots f~r entrance; Ess~ would have a strip, of land one way.and the Nartin~s, who propose to buy and build on Lot 1, would own the other l'ittle piece of the. vacated Ivy Lane. The Ess~ sold Lot 3 without including the 10 foot strip of ivy Lane. that was'vacated. The Commission questioned that the County' has not notified City of transfer and the status of that ten.feet and that that division makes Lot 3 nonconforming.. The Commission discussed the proposal at length.. It was noted that Ess~ acquired a corner of Lot 7 to ger.:he full 20 feet of .vacated Ivy Lane. FRED ASHER questioned the number of lots that woUl..d be ~esult of this division. There were no other comments or questlons, the Chalr closed the pub'llc hearing. Thal moved and Neyer seconded a .motion .that the Commission recommend approval with the stipulations by .the staff· The vote was unanimously in favor· Notion carried· A public hearing has been set by the. City Council for September 30, 1986. APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND OF LAND FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL Tom Ess SHADYWOOD POINT Lots 1-6 Block 10 · 218 Walnut Street S, ½ Vacated Ivy Lane Chaska, MN 55318 N, ½ Vacated Ivy Lane Location and complete legal description of proper~ to be divided: LO T 3, ~:~LK, ~ t Lots 1 thru 6, Block 10, SHADYW00D POINT, according to the recorded plat thereof, and the southwesterly half of vacated Ivy Lane adjoining said Lots 1 thru 6. ALSO Ivy Lane The northeasterly half of vacatedAadjoining Lot 3, Block 9 of said SHADYWOOD POINT. ALSO The southwesterly half of vacated Ivy Lane adjoining Lot 7, Block 10, of said SHADY~OOD POINT. ZONING R .- 1 To be divided as follows: 2 Parcels as shown on attached drawing SHADY~OOD POINT 2ND ADDITION All supporting documents, 'such as sketch p].ans,, surveys~ attach~en.t.s., etc. submitted'in':8½'"'X 11'! size "and/or. '14 copies, pi.us' one 8½"'X 11" copy. (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) must be A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. .' "From Square feet TO Square feet Reaso'n: N/A APPLICANT i [ (signa-'~re) _~..~ TEL. NO. ADDRESS 218 t4alnut Street DATE 8/20/86 Chaska, HN ~5~18 Applicant's interest in the property: Owner This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- 'ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: o 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT AND UTILITY PLAN SHADYW00D P01h'T 2tiD ADDI¥10~ ~,,~..e ~, TOM ESS ~ :'-' ~' ..>~.:"' APPLICATION TO PLANNING ~ ZONING COHHISSlON .......................... (Please type the following infor~ion) Case Fee Paid ~-~. ~ ~ Date Filed Street Address of Property LAKESIDE ROAD Legal Description of Property: Lots 1-6 & Vacated Ivy Lane Addition ' SHADYWOgD POINT ADDITION Owner's Name Tom Ess Address 218 Walnut Street, Chaska, Minnesota 55318 Day Phone No. 448-2125 e Applicant (if other than owner): SAME Name Address Day Phone No. Type of Request: (X) Variance ( ) ConditiOnal Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation.& Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit (X)*Other *If other, specify: .Preliminary Plat approval 6, Present Zoning District R-i 7. Existing Use(s) of Property VACANT .. 8. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property?not to our knowledgCf so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and tee statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described In tbls')applJcation by any authorized official of the City of Hound for the purpose of inspectlng~ or or.pos,ting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required b? law. . .... Signature of Applicant / (.~(.j ~ ~ . Date 8/20/86 Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date Request for Zoning Variance Procedure Case D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the Clty Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zonin~ Variance See Letter dated 8/20/1986 A. All information below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing wi)l be scheduled. B. Does the present use of the property conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes (X) No ( ) . = If "no", specify each non-conforming use: C. Do the existing structures comply with a11 area height and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ) If "no", specify each non-conforming use: N/A D. Which unique physical characteristlcs of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses.permitted in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface .( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: See litter Was the hardship described above c~eated by the action of anyone having property interests in the ]and after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes, explain: See letter Was the'hbrdshlp created by any other man-made change, such as the reloCa- tlon of a road? Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes, explain: · See letter Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X) No ( ) If no, how many other properties are'similarly affected? What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation· Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) ~pp l~tt.r ~nd Plan Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? '1 August 20, 1986 106 SOUTH BROADWAY · WAYZATA. MN. 55391 TELEPHONE 612-476-6000 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Clty Council City of F~und 5541Meywood Road Meund, Minnesota SubJect: Mr, Tom Ess Preliminary Plat and Yarlance Request Honorable Mayor and Council Members: Mr. Tom Ess Is applying for prellmlnary Plat approval to dlvlde his property on SHADYWOOD POINT. Mr. Ess has owned the property slnce 1983, The property Is presently platted as Lots 1-6, Block 10, SHADYWOOD POINT together with the 20 foot strip of land which Is vacated Ivy Lane. In the exlstlng situation, Mr. Essts ownership Is one parcel. His proposal Is to subdlvlde the property Into two lots, each of which would be as large or larger than the majority of the other lots in the neighborhood. The prellmlnary plat shows the geometry of these two proposed lots and the area of each above the ordlnary hlgh water mark of Lake Mlnnetonka. The majority of' the 'lo~s In the neighborhood were originally platted wlth 50 feet of lot width and frontage on the public streets. The slx lots which Mr. Ess owns each were plat-fed at the same standards, with frontage on Ivy Lane. Ivy Lane was never constructed and the clty has since vacated the road. The action to vacate the road has created a difficult sltuatlon for Mr. Ess. The original slx lots with 50 feet of street frontage each now have become one parcel with a total street frontage of 24 feet. The constructlon of one home on this property would not be a reasonable use of the property. The fact that the road was never opened for use has created a hardship on the land. We believe that the request to subdivide the property Into two bulldlng lots Is the minimum reasonable use of the property. Thls request for subdlylslon creates the need for two variances for lot width at the street. ^pplicatlon for a bulldlng permit on the exlstlng parcel would trigger the need to obtaln a varlance for lot width at the street, as well. The proposal Is to plat Lots 1 & 2, each with equal street frontage on Lakeside Road and to create a cross easement from Lot 1 to Lot 2 and Lot 2 to Lot 1 for the shared use of that part of vacated Ivy Lane leadlng Into the Internal portion of the property. In conclusion, the proposed subdlvlslon and associated varlances would allow the reasonable use of the property~ and would not be detrimental to the adjoining properties nor to the enforcement of the zonlng ordlnance. Sincerely, Richard W. Safhre, P.E. Pres I dent RWS/ts 13 \ ~ !':" CITY CITY of Lots 4-5-6- Doc. No. 2186205 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND LOT VARIANCE FOR LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, SHADYWCOD POINT SECOND ADDITION FOR TOM ESS WHEREAS, the City Council on September 30, 1986 held a Public Hearing pursuant to Section 2200, Chapter 22, Mound Code of Ordinances, to consider approval of a preliminary plat and lot area variances for the establishment of two residential lots described as Lots 1 and Lots 2, Block 1, Shadywood Point Second Addition: and WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the exception of lot width with the Mound Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and Ordinances of the City of Mound, Subdivision Code #422: and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for 48 foot lot width variances for Lot 1 and Lot 2 and such varainces have been reviewed by the Planning Commisssion who has recommended approval due to the unique shape of the property which meets the Zoning Ordinance criteria for the granting of variances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY (I)UNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND: Preliminary Plan and Variance case numbers 86-541 and 86-542 are approved upon compliance with the following requirements: 1. Per plat on file at Mound City Hall dated .~-;% I , 1986. 2. Posting of a subdividers escrow in the amount of $1000. 3. Setbacks of Lot 1 Shall be at least 27.5 feet to the front lot line (northwest), 10 feet on each side yard and at least 50 feet to the lakeshore. 4. Setbacks of Lot 2 shall be at least 29 feet to the front lot line (northwest), 10 feet to the side yard and at least 50 feet to the lakeshore. 5. Utility and grading plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. 6. The City Attorney shall review and approve the easement agreement for the common driveway and property title. 7. Since the project involves filling below the 931.5 elevation, grading, drainage, and erosion control plans shall be reviewed and approved by the watershed district and all other applicable agencies. 8. Park dedication fees shall be collected for Lots 1 and 2 consistent with current park charges for minor subdivisions. 9. Failure on the part of the applicant to submit a final plat per Section 22.13 within one year from the date of this approval shall deem the preliminary approval null and void. Ms. Oan Bertrand September 5, 1986 Rage Two RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Final Rlat approval contingent upon applicant receiving approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 2. A final grading and drainage plan be submitted and approved by the ' City Engineer. 5. Applicant enter into a development contract with the City and furnish a performance bond in the amount of $7,000.00, to cover the cost of grading and utility construction. 4. Add drainage easements to plat. 5. One deficient sewer unit charges of the amodnt of $292.00 is to be paid. The deficient street improvement unit charge is 1-~/4 units at $1,825.15 per unit, for a total of $~,199.26 are to be paid. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3ohn Cameron OC:jmj cc: Tom Ess Sathre-Bergquist, Inc, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS.LAND SURVEYORS,PLANNERS Ms. 3an Bertrand City of Hound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 September 5, 1986 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 SUBOECT: Proposed Plat - Shadywood Point 2nd Addition MKA#8055 Dear Jan: As requested, we have reviewed the plans submitted for the proposed plat of Shadywood Point 2nd Addition. The foilowing are our comments and recommendations. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN A permit or letter of approval from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District wtli be required. It appears that there could be a potential problem with water being trapped on Lot 7, Biock iO, Shadywood Point, since the iow area of Lot 6 in vicinity of the proposed driveway and turn around wiii need to be fiiied. The most logical soiution would be to fii1 this smaIi area on Lot 7, which wouid take permission from the Owner of Lot 7. We wouid Itke to see the grading pIan indicate how this potentiai probIem is to be handied. PRELIMINARY PLAN AND UTILITY PLAN The utilities,.as.shown beyond the City right-of-way, would be private. A permit and bond wtiI be required to excavate the street in order to instaiI the additional sewer and water services. A 6 foot drainage easement shouid be iocated aiong both exterior iot Ilnes and on each side of the one interior lot iine. We have not discussed any of the Items reiated to zoning requirements, as we assume the City Planner wtiI cover them in his report. MISCELLANEOUS It appears that this property is deficient one sewer unit in the amount of $292,00, When the streets in this area were improved as part of the 1980 street improvements, this property was assessed 1/4 of a unit and 7,000 square feet of area for a total assessment of $1,168.94. This leaves a deficiency of at least 1-3/4 units which amounts to $3,199.26. If IIiNNE AHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochrmn, Pres. · Nbe~t L. Lehman · John E. Thomas · Bart)mm R. Gudmundson · Michael B. Carroll September 26, 1986 LAKE MINNETO#KA WATERSHED BOUNDARY / IVEffr Honorable MaYor Pols'~ and City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Tom Ess, 45XX Lakeside Road, MCWD Permit Application No. 86-163 Honorable Mayor Polspon: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's Board of Managers reviewed the plans on September 18, 1986 from Mr. Ess for the proposed fill for placement of the building pad, compensatory excavation for the building pad fill, rip-rap, man-made lagoon behind the rip-rap, and dredging. The permit filling in of ~he ...... ~ ....... al by the DNR for the dredging, 2) was tabled penoing: l) review d,u ~p.v. ~ review of the plans and calculations balancing cut and fill for the building pad, and 3) review of past MCWD Permits which allowed filling of man-made boat slips. The applicant has submitted exhibits showing a first floor elevation of 2 feet above the projected regional flood elevation and calculations which demonstrate a balance of cut and fill for the proposed building pad. While these exhibits meet District standards for residential development on the lake, the Board of Managers expressed their concern about the low elevation of the backyard and that the present and future owners be made award~.jthat this portion of the property may be subject.to'periods of shallow flooding· At the request of the owner's representative, Clifford Reep, we direct this letter to you in the hopes of eliminating unnecessary delay for the applicant in the City's review of the subdivision request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District Julie Johnson Engineer CC: Board G. Macomber C. Reep T. Ess CITY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnespta NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 'EASEHENT VACATI ON FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 15, DEVON, Pi D 25-117-24 11 00~7 TO NHOH IT FrAY CONCERN: NOTICE-IS HEREBY. GIVEN THAT a meeting wlll b~ held at the City Hall, .53/~1 Haywood Road, Hound, HInnesota, at 7:30 P.H, on Tuesday, 't. he 30th. dayl of September, 1~)86, to consider the vacation of a per- petual easement 20 feet In width for public sewer, water and other utility purposes over the follov~lng described land, the South line of easement being the South line of said Lot 2, Block 15, Devon, PID // 25-t17-24 11 0047 (as created in.. Document No. 779757), q8q4 Island view Drive, Hound, Hinnesota. Such persons as desire to. be heard wi'th, reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Cla ty McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS September 5, 1986 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Perk Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Ms. Jan Bertrand Planning-and Zoning City of Hound .5431Haywood Road Hound, HN 55364 SUBJECT: Vacation o¢ Utility Easement Lot 2, Block 15, Devon MKA File #2113 DearOan: We have reviewed a survey supplied to us which shows the location of the improvements and the utility easement on the subject lot. The house extends approximately 10 feet into the easement. As you will note, the sanitary sewer is not located in this easement and the watemain crosses 5 feet north of the south p~operty line. We see no reason why the northerly 10 feet of this easement could not be vacated. I cannot furnish you a more complete legal description at this time because we do not have a copy of the original easement description. Enclosed is the copy of the survey supplied to.us. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron 3C:cah Enclosure 40. O0 l .cC,Ill&': SUR'VEY FOR: DAVID PRICE DESCRIPTION: Lot.2, Block 15, "DEVON". We hereby certify that this is a true an~ correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and o! the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 4th day of September, 1986. EG A N, F I EL D & N OW A K, I N C. Surveyors b y '/t~ .,','; /;iJ ,/ ;<./', ~-'", ."~ Minnesota Registration No. T7253 /wmne#asco A Company of Diversified Energies, Inc. September 10, 1986 Marjorie Stutsman City of Mound 5341Maywood Rd Planning and Zoning Department Mound, Minnesota 55264 RE: Proposed Easement Vacation for lot 2, Block 15, Devon, PID #25-117-24 11 0047 Dear Ms Stutsman: Minnegasco has an existing natural gas pipeline within the southerly portion of that 20 foot utility easement in the captioned property. We herein object to any vacation or encroachment of the southerly one-half (10 feet) of that easement. I would appreciate your keeping me informed on this matter and if I can be of further help please call me at 612-342-5381. Thanks for the advance notice. Sincerely, ,,~ Administrator-Real Estate cc: Pilon wRS/srm Minnegasco A Company o! Diversified Energies, Inc. William R. Schram Administrator -- Real Estate 612'~~3f/ 700 West Linden Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 700 West Linden Avenue September 9, 1986 No.em States Power Company Minnetonlm Division 5505 County Road 19 P.O. Box 10 Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Telephone (612) 4748881 City of Mound Planning and Zoning Dept. 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Attn: Marjorie Stutsman Dear Marjorie: This is in. regard to: Proposed Easement Vacation for L.2,B.15, 'Devon, PID #25-117-24 11 0047. Northern States Power Company has an overhead pole line running East & West along the North side of Island View Drive in the City of Mound. We wish to maintain the Easement for our protection rights. A copy is enclosed along with a sketch showing the line location. Sincerely, M. E. Peterson Community Service Manager LOSED). ROAD ;TUXEDO o~ ~SEO) BLVD. ROAD COMMON Plann|ng Commlss~on H|nutes September 8, 1986 Case No. 86-5/43 'pUbi'ic Hear.lng on er0poSed Ui:illty Easement Vacation Lot 2, Block 15; Devon Applicant, David Price, could.not be present. The Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the vacation request. Originally, mortgage dlfficuttles came up on selling of this property because of the garage being located on the easement. Hr. Prlce, Attorney for the o~ner, Sandra Nelson,. has tried to have the utilities field located to see whether or not some of the easement could be relinquished. The Engineer has reviewed the survey and ls recom- mending that we can vacate 10 feet to get the garage out of easement and retain the other ten feet. Hlnnegasco will be locating gas main (if any) prlor to the Councll hearing. The Building Offictal stated Hr. Prlce asked If the Commission could make a recommendation at this meeting'in order to move request along. Weiland moved to table and then retracted the motion; he stated he was not comfor- table voting when the Commission dld not have all the information. The Chair opened the public hearing and as no one present had any comments or ques- tions, she closed the public hearing. The Commission had various questions they discussed, such as age of structures and' when easement was signed and how this could happen, etc. Reese moved and Steve Smith seconded a motion to vacate the Northerly 10 feet of the easement subject to determination by the staff that no utilities currently exist in the Northerly 10 feet of the easement. Weiland voted nay (not enough information) and all of the others voted in .favor. Motion carried. The public hearing has been' set for September 30, 1986 Council meeting. APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF MOUND CASE NO. - FEE $150.00 DATE FILED ADDRESS 4844 Island View Drive,' Mou'nd .......... LEGAL DESCRIPTIO,~ OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: PlO # 25-117-24-11-0047 LOT 2 BLOCK'' 15' SUBDIVISION Devon EASEMENT ~ T0 BE'VACATED Utility easement"overthe'Southerly 20 feet of said lot as Created in Document No~'7'79757"('see'attached) REASON FOR REQUEST The house on 'the' premises encroaches on said easement. SIGNATURE .OF APPLI . ~~avld A. Pri~orney for Sandra Nelson ADDRESS 2195 Silver Lak~ RQa~, N~w Brighton. MN 55~12 TEL. NO. 636-1500 , Applicant's Interest in Property' fee title' Residents and owners of property abutting the~e~to be vacated: (Please:attach list'.' Certified mailing iist'can.be obtained from Hennepin County by calling 3/48-3271) to follow Recommended by Utilities: NSP Recommended by City: Public Works ; Minnegasco ; Fire Chief Continenta~ Telephone ; Engineer ; Police Chief ; Other Departments Planning'Commission Recommendation: Da t e Council Action Resolution No. Date TIM Form 68 rev. 5/85 That the unreleased encumbrances, liens and interest noted by the memorials underwritten or endorsed thereon appear as follows: Kent G. King and Frieda F. King, husband and wife to Village of Mound, (a Minnesota municipal corporation) Quit Claim Deed Da-ed August 15, 196h Fi2ed August 28, 196h DoG. No. 779757 Grnnting a oerpetual easement 20 fee% in width for public sewer, water and other utility purposes over above land, the South line easement being the South line of said Lot 2. MOUND --85 )VER RD RD )SOR I${ OF MOUND OF MINNETRtS"TA BAY) PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO, 86-543 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF A UTILITY EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS'LOT 2, BLOCK 15, DEVON, PID NUMBER 25-117-24 11 0047 P & Z CASE NO. 86-543 WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851, provides that the City'Council may by resolution vacate any utility easement, street, alley, public grounds,.or public way, or any part thereof, when it appears in the interest of the public to do so; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has clained a utility easement over the following described land: A perpetual easement 20 feet in width for public sewer, water and other utility purposes over the following described land, the South line of easement being the South line of said Lot 2, Block 15, Devon, PID No. 25-117-24 11 0047 (as created in Document No. 779757); 4844 Island View Drive, Mound, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 30, 1986, as required by law; aod WHEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires that a portion of this easement be vacated and that a portion be retained as a utility easement and that it would be in the publlc interest to do so. NOW-, THEREFORE, BE-IT RESOLVED that the City Council of.the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby vacates: The following described portion of the perpetual easement as originally described in Document No. 779757 as per attached Exhibit A: The vacated portion being the Northerly 10 feet of the described easement in Document 779757; the retained portion of the perpetual easement is described as follows: A perpetual easement 10 feet in width for utility purposes over Lot 2, Block 15, Devon, the South line of easement being the South line of said Lot 2. September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $32,095.68 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST LEVY ~10281 · NHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE FROM JULY 1, 1985 TO JUNE 30, 1986 NON, THEREFORE, BE IT the City of Mound, Minnesota: RESOLVED by the City Council of Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby'accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefi.tted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such installments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: XNT~ IMPROV£MENT CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE 1 8% 10281 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Hound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following. ~ep~emSer ~0, 198~ The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes· The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Property Identification 13-117-24 33 0001 13-117-2/4 33 0066 14-117-24 44 0001 14-117-24 44 0002 14-117-24 44 0003 14-117-24 44 0oOq 14-117-24 44 0006 13-117-24 33 0004 ' 13-117-2/4 33 0005 13-117-24 33 0006 13-117-2/4 33 0007' 13-117-24 33 0008 13-117-24 33 0011 13-117-24 33 0Ol/4 13-117-2/4 33 0015 13-117--2.q33 0016 13-117-2/4 33 0017 14-117-2/4 44 0046 13-117-24 33 0027 13-117-2/4 33 006/4 13-117-2/4 33 0042 13-117-2/4 33 00/43 13-117-2/4 33 0070 13-117-2/4 33 00/46 14-117-2/4 /440036 1~ 17-24 /440O37 14-117-2/4 44 0038 14-117-24 /440039 14-117-2/4 44 0O/41 14-117-2/4 /440042 13-117-24 33 00/47 13-117-2/4 33 0049 13-117-2/4 33 0050 13-117-24 33 0053 13-117-2/4 33 0054 13-117-2/4 33 0058 13-117-24 33 0059 13-117-24 33 0060 13-117-24 33 0061 13-117-24 33 0062 13-117-24 33 0063 TOTJ~.. 1986 CBD ASSESSMT ROLL AMOUNT CREDIT FOR LAND LEASED TO CI~ 842'.63 789.58 9O5.99 1776.96 4233.89 1231.26 156.16 553.8/4 229O .34 426.01 792.36 144.34 1222.67 335.71 844.59 768.17 554.67 176.14 1012.89 1873.13 383.36 810.87 976.35 1830.42 668.77 604.27 1203.45 703.99 14Ol .88 ~2.67 78~.36 8O8.40 132.36 2078.8O 24.49 144.83 23.13 365.14 -520.30 -1100.00 -616.00 -177.87 -1995.40 -15.40 -248.16 -4673.13 CREDIT APpLT~n -943.84 9/43.84 $ TO BE ASSESSED 8. ~3 789.58 905.99 1776.96 2769.75 1231.26 .00 553.84 Z29O .34 q26.01 792.36 144.34 1222.67 335.71 228.59 768.17 376.80 176.1/4 1012.89 -1~ .27 383.36 810.87 976.35 1~" 42 6~ -F7 604 1203.45 703.99 1386.48 214.51 7~.36 808.4O 132.36 2078.8O 24.49 144.83 23.13 365.14 .00 0 0 0 0 0 oo~ooosoooooooo~soooo 000 00000000 ~0 00000000000000000~~000 oooooooooooooo~o~ ~ ~ ~00000~0000000~0~00000~00~0~00~0~000 OOOOOOO 00000000 00000000 0~0000__ 0000000 0000~00 ~OOOO ~D ~4D O O O O O L~ L~CD~ O'l O O O O O O O O'l O ,'- O O O O O ~O O O ;~' O ~'-' ~' O O L~ O L'~ O O O OO ~O O~D O .~-I' O O O OO O~ O ~D .,-r C~ L~ L~ O C~ ~ O O O L~,O ~.- O ~4D O~ ~' Ll'l ~ O ~ ~ O ~ O ~ O L"...- b-.- 0 0 0 0 ~ooooo~o~ooooo~ooooooo~oo~o~oo~o~ooo ~ ,/??.s'-~ ~-~_~pternber 2:5, 1986 Fr. ar, cene C. ClarK, City Cler'K Ci t:.,- of Mound 5341 Maywood Road l~lound., hlN 55364 Dear' Francene; We (Philip Lansing ~ ~4. E. ~lueller) hereby appeal the CBD assessrr, ents on PID ~ 13-117-2:4 33 0042: a. nd PID # 13-117:24 33 0043 (the forrr, er Super Valu building) The assessrr, ents for the above proper, ties are $2337.40 and $383.36 for a total of $2,72:0.76. Part of the assessement is based on 40 spaces for c,:stomer parking anO 16.5 spaces for emplo>'ee parking. The property' uJas vacant 3 months of the 12 month a. ssessrr, ent period. Durinc-: the remaining .~' months ont>' 37:.,"; of the spa. ce ,.,..~as occupied, The tenant during that '? month period ~,,,,as. Ver. a'"s Used Furniture. She emplo;,'ed 2 pa.r.t time pe,-,pie in addition to hersel¥. The employee parking for that ? month period is 2 spaces. Ir; re,,.,ieu..~ing the ..~.sse.=.sment roll of the cu'=.tomer park:lng required for' other, retail outlets, ir, Mound: I u..,ould estirr, ate the customer pa.r~::ir~g for k.-~er..a's to be _=.iai lar to., or- te.=.s than tho'=.e required b:'," the R~j.=.t~que: ~,,~,-i-~ i.=_. 11 spaces. E:e,._--.ed on the CBD par. King formula..spp! led to ..~r.r.i,...,e at cost for each property the figures Yon our. proper-t ie.=. should be less tha. n: or. no rr, ore than $717.81 and $383.36, for. a combined tota! of $1,30i.!7 '"fours trul';¢': M, E, Muetler' · --::E.:~O i-:o, Rd, 44 ~'.!ound., hlf'4 ~F,:~,44 September RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID TREE REMOVAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $825.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNT~ AUDITOR AT 85 INTEREST LEV! #10278 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as requi'red by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: .' UNPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counoil of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. .P_Z9 13-117-24 14 0026 23-117-24 14 0016 Such installments shail be payable in equal annual installments as follows: INT. IMPROVEMENT AK0_~ ~ RATE LEVY~ Tree Removal 375.00 3 85 1O278 Tree Removal 450.00 3 85 10278 3. .. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following. September 30, 1986 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes· The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councllmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmemhers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 30, 19§5 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID CLEAN-UP CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF SQ0.O0 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUN~ AUDITOR AT 85 INTEREST LEV! #10279 #HEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as requi~ed by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: .' UNPAID CLEAN-UP CHARGES NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such installments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: PID IMPROVEMENT INT. 13-117-24 12 0103 Clean-Up Charges 40.00 1 8% 10279 3. .. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following · September 30, 1986 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and Seconded by Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councllmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk ~E~OLUT~O~ so. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT YATER & SENER ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,O53.1Z TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNT~ AUDITOR AT 85 INTEREST LEVY 910280 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following.. improvements, to-wit: DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted.and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such installments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: IMPROVEMENT 13-117-24 12 0118 Del. Sewer & Water 136.19 1 8% 10280 13-117-24 13 0014 Del. Sewer & Water 60.92 1 8% 10280 13-117-24 11 0071 Del. Sewer & Water 79.63 1 8% 10280 13-117-24 12 0019 Del. Sewer & Water 123.22 1 8% 10280 18-117-23 23 0'070' Del. Sewer & Water 120.58 1 8% 10280 23-117-24 13 0032 Del. Sewer & Water 74.56 1 8% 10280 23-117-24 13 0033 Del. Sewer & Water 221.47 1 8% 10280 24'~ t 17' 2 ~.--~f2~-OOJ$-l-.~De-l-~~~'~-&~W.at~e4~-"- '~KJ~~' '1 .... 8~ .... 24-117-2~ 11 0012 Del, Sewer & Water ?8,?? I 8% 10280 24-117-24 13 0032 Del, Sewer & Water 95.25 1 8% 10280 19-117-23 32 0149/ 0157 Del, Sewer & Water 107,23 1 8% 10280 19-117-23 31 0059 Del, Sewer & Water 102,02 1 8% 10280 24-117-24 43 0034 Del, Sewer & Water 96,81 1 8% 10280 19-117-23 33 0063 Del, Sewer & Water 135,71 1 8% 10280 24-117-24 44 0081 Del, Sewer & Water 93.?8 1 8% 10280 24-117-24 44 0003 Del, Sewer & Water 124,96 1 8% 10280 24-117-24 44 0164 Del. Sewer & Water 154.75 1 8% 10280 25-117-24 12 0134 Del, Sewer & Water 436,66 1 8% 10280 19-117-23 24 0053 Del. Sewer & Water 268,56 1 8% 10280 September 30, 1986 25-117-24 21 0075 Del. Sewer & Water 82.746 1 8% 25-117-274 21 0077 Del. Sewer & Water 121.742 1 24-117-274 qq 0026 Del. Sewer & Water 217.19 1 8% Total to be assessed is $3,053.12 10280 102 80 10280 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the' year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year foll owing. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes· The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councllmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID CAPPING OF SEWER LINE ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $393.75 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNT~ AUDITOR AT 85 INTEREST LEVY 910282 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the follow£ng improvements, to-wit: UNPAID CAPPING OF SEWER LINE CHARGES NOW,' THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto-and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such installments shall be ~ayable in equal annual installments as follows: IMPROVEMENT INT. 24-117-24 23 0030 Capping of Sewer Line 393.75 I 81, 10282 The' owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1985, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following · September 30, 1986 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councllmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING SANITAR! SEWER & WATER EXTENSION ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1351.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNT~ AUDITOR AT 81, INTEREST LEV! ~10283 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as requi'red by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: SANITARY SEWER AND WATER EXTENSION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby .accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such installments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: IMPROVEMENT AH~ ~EARS RATE LEV~ 13-117-24 33 0040 Sanitary Sewer & Water Extension 1351.00 I 81, 102 83 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following. ooy September 30, 1986 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded bM Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative~ The following Councilmembers voted in the n~gative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 30, RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING BOARDING UP HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $180.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNT~ AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST LL~! #10286 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as requi'red by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: .. BOARDING UP OF HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE CHARGES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such installments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: INT. IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY~ 13-117-24 33 0028 Boarding Up of Hazardous Structure Charges 180.00 1 81. 10286 3. .. The. owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the asse'ssment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following · September 30, 1986 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative[ The following Councilmembers vOted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk . oo? September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID WEED & GRASS CUTTING CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $125.28 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST LEV! #10287 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by Law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: .. UNPAID WEED & GRASS CUTTING CHARGES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Such proposed special assessments as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such installments shail be payable in equal annual installments as follows: IMPROVEMENT INT. 13-117-24 13 0001 Weed & Grass Cutting Charges 31.76 1 8% 10287 13-117-24 14 0019 Weed & Grass .'Cutting Charges 42.64 10287 24-117-24 13 0009 Weed & Grass Cutting Charges 30.00 1 85 102 87 24-117-24 44 0060 Weed & Grass Cutting Charges 20.88 1 85 102 87 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. September 30, 1986 After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected.and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councllmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk ? 2 September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS UPON WAIVER OF FORMALITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTI AUDITOR LEVl 91028~ - $1,~?0.90 WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) has the power to levy supplemental assessments and the power to levy deferred assessments; and WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially levied in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for supplemental and deferred assessments have been executed by the property owner and delivered to the City. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby: Pursuant to its authority under Chaper 429, Minnesota Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that each of the parcels of land hereinafter described have benefited in an amount equal to the amount set opposite each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and each such supplemental and deferred assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments over such period of years.as shown: PID ~ IMPROVEMENT INT. 13-117-24 31 0036 . 10284 Supp. Sewer 7514 8 8% 1,170.90 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax lost and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following. September 30, 1986 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foreging resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:' The following Councllmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS UPON WAIVER OF FORMALITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNT~ AUDITOR LEV~ ~10285 - $1,768.~5 WHEREAS, the City Counoil, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) has the power to levy supplemental assessments and the power to levy deferred assessments; and WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially levied in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for supplemental and deferred assessments have been executed b2 the property owner and delivered to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby: Pursuant to its authority under Chaper q29, Minnesota Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that each of the parcels of land hereinafter described have benefited in an amount equal to the amount set opposite each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and each such supplemental and deferred assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments over such period of years as shown: PID ]~ IMPROVEMENT INT. 13-117-24 13 0023 10285 Supp. Sewer 7928 9 8% 1,768.45 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time before October 30, 1986, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, p.ay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax lost and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of assessment through December 31 of the year following. September 30, 1986 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes· The foreging resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember . The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: May or Attest: City Clerk CASE NO. 86-544 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official Planning Commission Agenda of 'September 8, 19~6 CASE NO. 86-544 APPLICANT: Leroy L. RoSemary M. Luedke LOCATION: 5421Tonkawood Road LEGAL DESC.: NWly. lOOft, of Block 1 and all land between extensions into Lake Minnetonka of the NW &'SE, excepting the SWly. 75 ft. of Block l, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park PID #13-117-24-32-OOO1 SUBJECT: Front yard setback variance EXISTING zONING: R-1 Single Family Residentia) The applicants, Mr. & Mrs. Leroy Luedke,a6e requesting a 15 foot front yard variance to allow for a 14 by 32 ft. addition to their dwelling. The R-1 zoni-ng district requires a 30 ft. setback from the street right-of-way. Section 23.408 (6} however, allows the property owner 'to average the adjoining houses on either side, but not closer than twenty(20} feet. The.adjoining structure to the southwest is closer to Tonkawood Road than the new addition would project. The street as-built drawing is attached with the area being considered circled to indicated the curb line to be 15 ft. from the owners property. The addition would be set back another 15 ft. from the improved right-of-way. RECOMMENDATION: staff recommends approval of the requested 15 ft. front yard variance due to the relocation of the improved right-of- way and the averaging of t.he adjoining neighbors structure. The abutting neighbors have been notified. Planning Commission Minutes September 8, 1~86 Case No. 86-$q4 Fr0n~'Yard rsetb~'ck Varianc~' for'Sq21Tonkawood Koao .... NWiy. 100feet of Block I, and al,l~land between, extensions into Lake Minnetonka of the NW & SE, excepting the SWly. 75 feet of Block 1, Abraham Llncoln Addition to Lakeside Park ~ PlO # 13-117-24 32 0001 Leroy and Rosemary Luedtke were present, and also. Douglas Coleman. The Building 0ffi~ial, Jan. Ber~rand,,revi'ewed the. request .for a front, yard variance to allow construction of~an addition to the Northwestern portiOn of 'their home, lq by 32 feet, to balance out'the addition to Southeasterly part of house. The staff recommends' approval of the requested 15 foot" front yard variance.due to. the relocation of.the improved right-of-Way and.. the averaging of the adjoin'lng neighbor's structure. DOUGLAS COLEMAN of 2100 Noble.Lane'objected to the variance because of the loss of the lakeview. ROSEMARY LUEDTKE statedthat the'trees i.n.front of her property vlrtually block the view through the Propqrty; Mr. Coleman still has the view of the lake over the commons from his property and deck. She stated they.have one of the smaller lakeshore homes; one story. The Commission discussed the request and what was private lakeshore and Com- mons. Mr. Coleman asked when Waterside. Commons became private lakeshore? Thal moved and Ke~ Smith seconded a motion 'to.recommend approval of the requested variance. The vote was: Steve Smith, Thal, Ken Smith, Michael and densen in favor with Meyer, Reese and Weiland voting nay. Motion carries by a $ to 3 vote. This will be on.the City Council agenda for September 30, 1~86. '- ! ~ L..:' ' .~'-~i~ Case · , '" ~7-T~'.,e type the following infor~tion) Street Address of Property Legal Description o~ Property: Eb~msJm~'~tp~.'~. ~ ~e'~O~ 'Block ' -' , ~~, ~~ me ~K~Y/); ~ the~ I. Addition Ah~h~ ~;~o~7~JddF~ inn e~ F:a~e~fde Pa~ PID Nol~-II?-2~-]~-O00I _ Owner's Na~ /.~Pov r,. ~ p6~ M.'Lu~e . 'Day Phone No. .,~ rro~ ~r~. Applicant (if other than owner): Name Day Phone No. Address Type of R~quest:. (X.) Variance ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wet[and Permit ( ) P.U.O. If other, specify: . Present Zoning District.. _ ( ) Condltlonal Use Permit ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ()*Or,her ?. Existing Use(s) of Property ., Residential ....... 3. Has an appli'cation ever been mdc for &onin~j variance, oF condltlo~al use permit or other zoning procedure for this property~ lvo , If so, Jlst date(s) of list date(s) of appllcatlon, actic~ taken and prove-de Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany p~esent request. I certify that all of the above statements and t~e statements Contalned in any required ~apers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises descrlbed In this application by any authorlzed official of the City ~f ~oun~ for the purpose of/J~'~ectlng, or ~;~f posting, malntalning and removing such Signature of Applicant~~//¢~~ · Planning Com~nission Recon~endat : j ~ : ,. Date' rnt~ncil Action: Resolution No. Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure (2) Case D. Location of: Signs, easements~ underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. ~equest for a Zoning Variance A. All information below, a site plan, as described in Part il, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of. the property'conform to a11 use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes (~) No ( )' If "no", specify each non-conforming use: Co Do the existing structures comply with all area height and bulk regulations for the zone district in which i't is located? Yes (~) No ( ) If "no'~, specify each non-conforming use: De Ee Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow ( · ) Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too. small ( ) Drainage ( ) ( ) Too shallow (X) Shape (,~) Sub-surface Other: Specify: Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (~) If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the,,~eloca- tion of a road? Yes (~) No ()~) If yes, explain: Ge Are the conditions of hardship for'which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~(') No (' ) If no, how many other p. roperties are similarly affected? H. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional Io Wl l] granting of the variance be materially cretrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? or ,f~P~. ~c~. 2Ol7 APPLICATION - CITY 0F MOUItD pLAI~II~G/ZOIIIIIG COMMISSION Aug, uK20,19~6 l_l~OY L. & ROSEMARY M. LU~DE]i ~42 1 TONKAWOOD ROAD. MOUND PROPI~UTY ID ~ 1~- 117-24-~2-0002 The followinj{ information is.respectfully submitted to the Planning and Zoning ConmFission of :the City of Mound as backup ~formation to the Application for ~ariance. . DUILDIHG pLAN: To add a one _ .-st0ry. 14' X 32' (family room) addition to the North/Northwest side of existing one _ _-~.. home a.t 5421 Tonka- wood Road. This addition will match 14' X 32' addition (built in 1975) on opposite (South/southwest) side of home. I I. NE]D: The need for this addition is twofold: 'First; toprovide needed livinj~/di-i'r,g space in the Luedke home. intended when the first addition was built in 1975. dBecause the home is located beyond the end of (where it turns northwest into Wa~erside), the ~aarage and driveway_ face Tonka~ Road, b.ut ~e ho.u~e., in reality, ces Harrison Bay of Lake I~_.i~.e~. This Ia~ is. re~flTorcecl bY ~ noting that Coleman'$ house (Lot ~ on Plat Survey_), which is placed on its lo,in exactly the same manner as ours, is considered to be ~acing on Noble Lane, ~ where its garage and driveway also face. Furthermore, because the C~. mmon~ A?ea abuts our property t_ine to the north/northwest, the back (southw~,~c) .corner- of our hohse is, in reality, 71.9' from the road, and the'garage is 62' from the curb. The addiUon, if approved, would still b~ 57.9' f~'sm the road, albeit only 16.4' from the "Right oI Way" (Commons). t on the ~orth/northwest side of the home at ~542.1 To~kawood Road, allowing it to come within 12' of the lot line. This loc line abuts on Commons Area, currently identified as "Undeveloped Right of Way". Variance could be issued either of two'w~.ys: 1. Redefine, for this case only, the north/northwest side of the home as a "side", rather than "front", allowing the stru~e to.4~me with- in 1 O' of the lot tine. -OR- 2. Allow the north/not, west side (defined as "front") of this home to come within 15' of the lot line, variance being 15' from the normal front setback r _equirements, due to unique p4~itio~Jng of home on lot and next to CSmmons/"Right of'Way~. Page 2 . Request for variance Le£oy. L. & R~ M. Luedke 5421 Tonkawood Road, Mound ..me,..si~e-oz our no...u~e.is l~.y. ~ described as the "front", m~ting lc yum. I~ ' .m~..p~D. le ~O m...e~..~me front setback requirements in the pr0Pose~ builamg o! an addition.. . Due to structural and roofline considerations of the e~ structure, there is no other feasible location for an addition. .e ~the~y, this a.d~i., tion.: if approved., would not look a~_y clo~er to r_~og.? ~ .a~.y o~, me .o.mer homes mong Tonkawood. In fact, it ~ De xurmer ~rom me road than ;mo/t, Since it would not be a.b?ting.any other structure, it:will not in any way i~iringe upon any omer cmzen's space. ' l~inally, it would also _'_un_prove the physi(al appearance of the home by when a ur~; ao~uo~ was ou~ ~ ~ years a~o. . vWa~areo .~r. e that approval of this variance request would only add to ue ox u~. l~.?ce P: proi~ty, .both for. us, th~ present owners of the home, and Ior u~e Cit~ Ol Mouna, as Well. Your 1~, .o~npt review and consideration of this request is greatly a_ppreaau~._. Any questions, could be .direr.. tous at. 4W2-$608, or, 33,-9 o na -work), 475- 50 ..work .. . NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IS AS FOLLOWS: l~.e n.o.~.westerly 100 feet of bl,__o~.~ 1, "Abr~B~ H~coln Addition to e~.'de. Park,.¥oun.d ~(.sic): _.tggether with all of the land .rog De..t?een me exr..en~ons into take Mttfnetonka of the northly .an~ .so.u .thea?~rl. y boun. _daries of said north_ .w~. y_ 100 feet of said I~loCk .l._.ana .iF .rog De~ sa~..d n .o[th~y 100 feet df said Block 1 and Lake oz .m..e aorm. wes~e.rzy z. uu z~.[ ox ~ata ~zoa~ z, a _c~r_ ~ to [ne ~lat~ thereof ..on me .or ~ recFr, a m cae omce of the ReSister of Deecl~ in and for said nen~epm t;oun~y. -- $CAL£: ! It,~CH '~ ~' . FEEl' OF PROPERT~ OF THE JOHN J. RYAN CO. LOCATION /.0 j CERTIFICATE OF IL)CATION OF BU'ILDLNG I hereby certify that on October 12 19 72 this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land /.,Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ( ..... ,". f CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on 19 this sur~'ey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supcr~'ision and that I am a duly Registered Land . Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ~,.~ .......... [ ............................................ : ................... .~ ................... h'Yi ..................................................................... , ....................... [ ...................................................................... :'"::ii2::Cii:;:i:;::;::?"~:i~:~ ...... "" '~ ........... ! .......................................................................... :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~-- --- '"~'~ ................................................................................... t .................................................................... : ........................ .................. , ....................... ~ ........................................... r' ~ :.:"~:'::-":~'"~'.~....: ...................... ! ............................................................................................. ..... ~s .................................. i .......................................................................... .,~ ........................ ~_..;"~ * ~ ......... ...-f..~ ..................... ~ , ~ ~ ~ · ............................................................. ..... · "'~ ...................... t :Z::':'::':: ........................ ~'~ ........................................................ ~',~'~ .................................................................................... ..... ~ ................................... , ......................................... L:..iii:: :i :i::::i:~ Ii i i:: :i:i:i : '":: ...................... I ....... '"'~'"'-"'~"~'i ................................................... ::::~: ::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: ! ~:! :::::::: ......................... :.::...::: ======================== ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............................. :::::::::: ................... .... ~ ................... ............... ~ ..................................... ~ ~.'! .......... ~ ............................................................................. i .............................. 1 .............................................................. ! ........ .................. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 03{ ............................... , ................................................................. , ............. ~ ................................................................................ ~ ............................................................................................. ....................... ~ ........................................................... ~ r) ~ 0 .................................. d .................... ~ ......................................................................... .... ~. ................. ~ .......... ~..~ .................. ,,. ................................... ~...~.; ......... ~.~ ......... ~_ ........................... *. · '2 ................. ':z ......... ~,~ .................... z ................................... ~' ':-'~ ......... 0 .................13' ................................... ~0 .................. '~'~ ..................................................................... ~ r ' 'z! ............... '* .................................... ~",~ ......... ~ ................. ~ .................................... ~ .................... ~ ............................................................................................. ....................~. ~..i ......... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1111111211111111211111111111 / ~ .,' ~'~ CEDAP~'" LA PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 86-544 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A SETBACK VARIANCE FOR NORTHWESTERLY 1OO FEET OF BLOCK 1 AND ALL LAND BETWEEN EXTENSIONS INTO LAKE MINNETONKA OF THE NORTHWEST. AND SOUTH- EAST EXCEPTING THE SOUTHWESTERLY 75 FEET OF BLOCK ], ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, PID NUMBER 13-117-24 32 0OO1 (5421Tonkawood Road) P & Z CASE NO. 86-544 WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Leroy Luedke, the owner of the property described as the Northwesterly lOO feet of Block 1 and all ]and between extensions into Lake Minnetonka of the Northwest and Southeast excepting the Southwesterly 75 feet of Block l, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park, have applied for a front yard variance In setback to the Northwesterly portion of the property to construct a 14 by 32 foot addition to their dwelling; and WHEREAS, Exhibit A has also been submitted to indicate the re- quested setbacks of 15 feet to the Northwest front yard property line and existing complying setbacks to the structure; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires~a'30 foot front yard setback to the street right-of-way in the R-I Zoning District and l0 foot sideyard~ 50 foot lakeshore setback and 15 foot rear yard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval 'of the setback variance to the front yard as requested due to the relocation of the improved right-of-way and the averaging of the adjoining neighbor's structure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve a 15 foot front yard setback to the property line from Tonkawood Road right-of-way as requested and shown on Exhibit A for the Northwesterly 100 feet of Block l, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeslde Park, Mound Minnteonka, together will all of the land lying between the extensions into Lake Minnetonka of the Northwesterly and Southeasterly boundaries of said Northwesterly 1OO feet of said Block 1 and lying between said Northwesterly 1OO feet of said Block 1 and Lake Minnetonka, excepting therefrom the following: The southwesterly 75 feet of the northwesterly 1OO feet of said Block l, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County, PID Number 13-117-24 32 O001 (5421Tonkawood Road)' due to the averaging of the adjoining neighbor's-structure and the relocation of the improved portion of the Tonkawood right-of-way. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner ~/ DATE: August 27, 1986 SUBJECT: Variance Request - Existing Nonconforming Structure and Deck APPLICANT: Bradley M. and Janice M. Bristol LOCATION: 1559 Bluebird Lane EXISTING ZONING: Sirgle Family Residential (R-2) BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a variance to recognize a nonconforming principal structure and attached deck. Upon approval, they intend to construct a conforming detached garage on the parcel. The existing house has conforming front and side yard setbacks and the lot area exceeds the minimum required for R-2 uses. At the rear of the structure, which abuts a commons area, the northeast corner of the deck touches the property line and the'corner of the house is 10 feet away from the rear property line. The Mound Zoning Code calls for a 10 foot setback for decks and a 15 foot rear yard setback for the principal structure. Accordingly, the applicant is seeking a 10 foot deck variance and a 5 foot rear yard variance in recognition of existing conditions. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested variances to recognize the existing nonconforming principal structure and deck. Additionally, approval of the garage is recommended providing that the structure conform to buildingandzoning code requirements. Planning Commission Hinutes September 8, 1~86 Case No. 86-545 Variance recognl'zlng the existing nonconforming lake front setback to allow construction'of a detached garage; Lots 8 and 29, Block 6, Woodland Point Bradley and Janice Bristol were present. The City Planner, Ha.r~ Ko, gl,r, reviewed his report stating applicants Want to bulld.a totally conforming detached garage? Situation is that this lot does abut the Commons and'the hOuse sits lO feet away from the rear property line (Commons) and the northeast, corner of the deck touches the property line. The Chair questioned if house andldeCk were'in place before the setbacks were established. The Building Official gave some background on the house. The interior was remode:led, but the house and deck Were there. The Commission discussed.house numbers mis'sing on quite a. few properties and.they had'dif- ficulty finding property. Welland moved and Meyer seconded a motion.to approve the requested variance. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. This wi]l be on the City Council agenda for September 30, 1~86. --lt~ ¢.A.¢L,CATION'O PLANNING& ZONING COMMISS!ON (~jt..¢ j= -: nj ~'(Please type the following information) 1. 2. Legal Description of Property: Lots 8 & 29 Add i t i on WooOlBnd 3. Owner's Name B~adle~ M. & Janlce M. Brlstol Address 1559 Blueblrd Lane, Mo~d~ q. Applicant (if other than owner): Name N/A Case No Date Fi led Block 6 PID No. 12-117-21) 1)3 001)0/0050 Day Phone No. 8])5-0929 55 6q Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: (/~) Variance ( ) Conditional Use. Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. Amendment Sign Permit X)*Other *If other, specify: Please see .attached explanation Present Zoning District Residential ~ 7. Existing Use(s) of Property Residential 8. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? No I~ so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the'above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City removing such of Mound for the purpose of inspecting,.or of posting, mai.qtalning and notmces as may be req6ired by law ' ' Signature of Applicantt~-~- _~(~)'-~,~-~_:~%~ Planning Commission Recommendation: v · Date~ Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date_~ 4/82 Request for Zoning Variance Prc~cedure '(2) D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. : E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. II!. Request for a Zoning Variance A. All information .below~ a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does' the present use of the property conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes. (Z) No ( ) If "no", specify each ~onTFonformlng use: Ce Do the existing structures comply with all area height and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is.located? Yes (X) No ( ) If '~no'~, specify each non-conforming use: De Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted 'in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ' ( ) Soil ..' ( ) Too. sma1!. '( ) Drainage. ( ') Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape (' ) Other: Specify: N/A E® Was the hardship, described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (Z) If yes, explain: F® Wa~ the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as. the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (X) · If yes, explain: Ge A~e the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X) No ( ) If no, how many other prgperties are similarly affected? He What is the"'minimum"modiflcation (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) See attached explanation Will granting of the variance be'materlally detrimenta) to'property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? ,. No We wish to build an unattached garage. The garage we have planned will meet all current setbacks and building cod~s. The reason we are providing this explanation is under the recommendation of Jan Bertrand that we do so. The home that we purchaesd in August 1985 did not meet current lake commons setbacks. However, the original structure was built before current setbacks and building codes were established. Numerous improvements and extensive remodeling were done by the builder who we purchased the home from. The original structure was grandfathered to allow these improve- ments to be accomplished. Our desire is to build an unattached garage which will make no changes to the home itself. Please refer to the attached site plan for further clarification. CO 0 0 ~,o3~ RESOLUTION 86- RESOLUTION TO (I)N(I~ WITH THE PLANNING ~SSION TO REGOGNIZE AN EXISTING NON- GONPORMING SETBACK fOR LOTS 8 AND 29, BLOCK 6, ~DODLAND POINT, PID % 12-117-24 43 0040/0050 (1559 BLUEB~ LANE) P & Z CASE NUMBER 86-545. WHEREAS, Bradley M. and Janice M. Bristol, owners of property described as Lots 8 and 29, Block 6, Woodland Point, PID # 12-117-24 43 0040/0050, has applied for a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming principal structure and rear yard deck for the purpose of constructing a conforming detached garage on the parcel; and WHEREAS, the existing deck has a 0 foot setback to the rear property line and the principal structure has a 10 foot setback to .the rear property line; and WHEREAS, the Mound Zoning Code requires a 10 foot rear setback for decks and a 15 foot rear setback for principal structures in the Single Family (R-2) zone; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Co'uncil of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve a 10 foot rear yard deck variance and a 5 foot rear yard variance for the principal structure for Lots 8 and 29, Block 6, Woodland Point. COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS ! PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 September 24, 1986 Mr. Edward Shukle, City Manager City of Mound 534i Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUB3ECT: Bartlett Boulevard MSAP 145-103-02 MKA$7931 Dear Ed: Enclosed is Buffalo Bituminous' Final Payment Request for the subject project. The amount of this request is $2,814.59. Since this work is fuiIy compieted, we are recommending that the retainage be paid. We have reviewed the project and find that it is in accordance with the pians and specifications. It is our recommendation that the Contractor be paid in fuiI for this project. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3ohn Cameron OC:jmj Enclosure cc: Buffalo Bituminous t~INA.T., CONTRACTOR PAY ESTIMATE NO. 02 PAGE , BARTLETT BOULEVARD - MSAP 145-103-0E - MOUND, MN O1 ENGINEER'- McCOMBS-KNUTSON CONTRACTOR'- BUFFALO BITUNINOUS 1eBO0 IND.PK.BLVD. PLYMOUTH, MN E~S441 DATE: -- CONTRACTOR PAY. ESTIMATE SUNHARY -- THIS PERIOD TO DATE iIORK COMPLETED SECTION 1 667. BO 43,603.50 MATERIALS ON SITE ~CTION 1 0.00 0,00 ADZUSTED TOTAL LESS RETAINAGE - 5Z PREVIOUS, 667.80 43,603.50 OZ CURRENT -E,146.78 0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE FOR WORK COMPLETED TO DATE LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS E, 814.58 43,603.50 "0. O0 40,788.91 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 2,814.S9 E,814.S9 -- SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS PAYMENTS -- ESTIMATE NO. DATE AMOUNT TOTAL 1 06/18/86 4 O, 788.91 40,788.91 APPROVED: ENGINEER: McCOMBS-KNUTSON APPROVED: CONTRACTOR: BUFFALO BITUNINOUS ~'-,~u'IP, AC'[OR PAY ESTTMATE NO. O~ PAGE '~93 1 BARTLETT BOULEVARD - MSAP 145-103-02 - MOUND, MN SECTION 1 O~ ENGINEER; McCOMBS-I~UTSON CONTRACTOR'- BLFFALO BITUMINOUS ~SO0 IND.PK.BLVD. PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 DATE: 091].9186 -- PAYMENT SUHMARY FOR ~OP~ COMPLETED TO DATE -- ITEM ITEM CONTRACT UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE QUANTITY 1 20El. SO1 MOBILIZATION 1.0 LS 400.00 0.0 E 2104.50~ REM. BIT. PAVE 1,650.0 SY 1.00 0.0 3 2104.513 SAW BIT. PAVE 100.0 LF 1. SO 0.0 4 210~.501 COMMON EXCA¥. 1,400.0 CY 4.00 0.0 5 2105.533 SALV. AGGR. EV 100.0 CY 10.00 0.0 6 2211.501 AgGR. BASE CL.E 1,SO0. O TON B.O0 0.0 ? 8211.501 AHGR. BASE CL.$ 1,0~0.0 TON ?.00 0.0 8 2331.504 BlT MAT FOR MIX 16.0 TON 165.00 0.0 9 2~1.514 BASE COURSE MiX ~0.0 TON 14.00 16.4 10 2341.S04 BIT MAT FOR MIX 10.0 TON 165.00 0.6 1/ 2341.514 EAR COURSE MIX 170.0 TON 16.00 21.E 2357.502 BIT HAT FOR TC 90.0 GAL 1.00 0.0 13 2502~S41 6"TP PIPE DRAIN 800.0 LF 2.00 0.0 14 2506.~82 ADS. CASTINGS 1.0 EA 200.00 0.0 lS S.P. HEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1,700.0 SY 0.50 0.0 _u- THIS PERIOD ..... AMOUNT 0.00 O. O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 229.60 99.00 339.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUANTITY 1.0 1,650.0 100.0 1,400.0 0.0 1,570.3 1,041.5 16.4 365.4 11.8 214.5 100.0 800.0 1.0 1,700.0 AMOUNT 400. O0 1,650.00 150. O0 5,600.00 0.00 1E,S~?..40 7,890.50 E,706.00 5,1IS.60 1,c~7.00 3,432.00 100.00 1,600. O0 2 O0. O0 8~0. O0 ' TOTAL SECTION 667.80 43,603.50 CONTRACTOR P~Y ESTIH~TE NO. Oe PA~E 79~'~ B~RTLETT BOULEVARD - ~S~P 145-103-0~ - HOUND, ~H SECTION I O3 ENGINEER: HcCDHBS-HNUTSON CONTRACTOR: BUFFALO BITUHINOUS 1ESO0 IND.PK.ELVO. PLYHOUTH, HN 55441 DATE: 09/19/86 ~ PAYHENT SUHHARY FOR HATERIALS ON SITE -- THIS PERIOD ITEH ITEH CONTRACT UNITS INVOICE UNITS TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION OUANTITY DELIVERED PRICE ON SITE ITEH VALLE INVOICE PRICE TO DATE UNITS ON SITE TOTAL ITEH VALLE TOTAL SECTION I 0.00 0.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE 4E,800.00 + CHANGE 0.00 '= REVISED CONTRACT AHOUNT 4E,800.00 ,lo37 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ¢, LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS September 30, 1986 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. Edward Shukle, gr. City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBSECT: Dear Ed: Lynwood Boulevard M.S.A.P. 145-104-03 As you are aware, the City Council granted an extension to the completion date on the Lynwood Boulevard Street Improvement Project at their last meeting in August. We had requested that the Contractor not place the wearing course on Lynwood Boulevard until the Commerce Place parking lot is finished, which should be this week. For this reason, we are recommending that the City extend the completion date to October 15, i986. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact me. $C:jmj cc: Bruce Anderson Rreferred Paving Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. $ohn Cameron CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF ADVERTISEMENT. FOR BIDS FIRE/RESCUE APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Mound will receive sealed bi'ds for Fire/Rescue'Apparatus and Equipment until 10:00 A.M., on Thursday, October 30, 1986, at the City Offices, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, at which time the bids will be opened, read aloud and tabulated. The bids will be considered by the City Council at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, November 12, 1986. Specifications are available in the office of the City Clerk, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 - Phone 612-472-1155. Bid security equal to 10% of the total bid must accompany each bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive informalities in bids. Francene C. Clark, CMC, City Clerk Publish'in The Laker October 6, 1986 & The Construction Bulletin October 10, 1986 8-13-86 SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIRE/RESCUE APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT For: Mound, Minnesota RELIABILITY OF CONTRACTOR; The contractor shall furnish satisfactory evidence that he has the ability to construct the apparatus as specified, and shall state the location of the factory where the apparatus is to be built and serviced. WARRANTY: .As a condition of the exceptance of the specified apparatus, the Contractor shall furnish the following WARRANTY; We warrant each new piece of fire and rescue apparatus to be free.from defects in material and workmanship under normal use and service. Our obligation under this WARRANTY is limited to the repair and replacing, as the Company may elect, any part or parts thereof which shall be returned to us with transportation charges prepaid and as to which examination shall disclose to the Company's satisfaction to have been defective, provided that such part or parts thereof shall be returned to us no later than one year after delivery of such vehicle. Such defective part or parts will be returned or replaced free of charge and WITHOUT CHARGE FOR RE-INSTALLATION, to~ the original purchaser. This warranty will not apply: l. To normal maintenance services or adjustments. 2. To any vehicle which shall have been repaired or altered outside of our factory in any way so as in our judgement, to affect its stability, nor which has been subject to misuse, negligence, or accident, nor to any vehicle made by us which shall have been operated at a speed exceeding the factory rated speed, or loaded beyond the factory rated load capacity. 3. To commercial chassis and associated equipment furnished with chassis, signaling devices, generators, batteries, or other trade accessories inasmuch as they are usually warrantied separately by their respecitive manufacturers. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, expressed or implied, all other representations to the original purchaser and all other obligations or liabilities, including liabilities for incidental or consequential damage on the part of the Company. We neither assume any other warranty or liability on the Company's behalf unless made or assumed in writing by the Company. CARRYING CAPACITY: The full laden weight of the completed vehicle, including the full complement of equipment and equivalent personnel loading of ~000 lbs. shall not exceed the chassis manufacturer's published GVWR for the model. In any event, the total load of each axel shall not exceed the published rating for the axel nor exceed the axel loads permitted under applicable laws. A Bidder's Bond in the amount of ]0% shall be furnished with each Bid Proposal, written by a Corporate Surety, payable to the Fire Dept. This Bo~.~ is to insure that the Bidder will enter into a Contract for the equipment as per the following specifications, with "No Exceptions" FIRE RESCUE SPECIFICATIONS The Fire Department ~eserves the right to reject any or all Bid Proposals and purchase the equipment it prefers. Each Bid shall be submitted with a complete detailed Print of the apparatus as is specified. The print shall be to scale, minimum of ! inch - !0 inches of the exact apparatus being proposed, and not a stock print of a similar unit. The Print shall have complete views of the left side with chassis cab, right body side, and rear of body. Ail compartmentation, hosebed arrangements, lighting locations, and any optional crew cab dimensions shall be noted on the print. Ail submitted drawings shall become a part of the Proposal, failure to submit the required Prints with the sealed Bid prbposal is cause for REJECTION of the Proposal and Bid. Drawings shall become property of the Fire Department. It is the intent of the Fire Department to receive Proposals on equipment/ apparatus meeting the attched detailed specifications in their entirety. Any proposals being submitted WITHOUT "full compliance" with the advertised specifications shall so state on the Bid Proposal page, followed by a detailed "letter of exceptions" listing the areas of non-compliance and equipment being substituted. The Bidder shall furnish complete "Proposal" specifications on their own stationary. Copies or reproductions of these "advertised specifications" are not to be used as any part of the Bid Proposal. Bidders shall specify number of calander days for completed delivery of apparatus from the date of bid acceptance. FIRE RESCUE SPECIFICATIONS APPARATUS BODY AND EQUIPMENT: The entire apparatus body shall be of all bolted construction with all back flanges prime painted and sealed prior to final installation and final assembly. All bolts to be polished stainless steel !0-24 or larger, Phillips head cap screws with all nuts to be "Kep- Nuts" £o pre~ent loosening. The entire body, including all compartment doors, compartment dividers, adjustable compartment shelves, compartment tops, compartment corners, front and side sheets, and the entire canopy area shall be fabricated of minimum .125 inch aluminum sheet material with heavier materials used in critical areas. The compartment doors shall be U-formed minimum ! inch thick, fabricated of aluminum sheet. Interior braces fabricated of 4-way polished aluminum treadplate designed for maximum strenth, caulked with silicone sealant prior to final assembly, held in place with stainless steel fasteners. Inner liners shall be designed to allow access to the latch mechanism and hinge bolts. Ail doors shall be of the "flush" design to custom fit the door openings and not lap-style. Hansen model I02-L large D-handle double-point chrome plated door latch assemblies shall be furnished to latch the doors both top and bottom. Galvanized steel door rods to be equipped with guides attached to bottom and top door edges. Exterior door panels to be smooth with no welds or fasteners on exterior door skins. Neoprene rubber gaskets shall be furnished between door skin and latch assembly. Bottoms of all double compartment doors to be equipped with hard rubber bumper stops. Area where double doors meet shall be weatherstripped offset to allow flush fit of the lapping door. ' ' Hansen style ALH5EC rod tyPe stainless steel spring door holders to be furnished and installed on all vertically hinged compartment doors. Door holders to be bolted in position and removable. Interior compartment doors to be properly reinforced to accomodate specified door holders. Door holders shall be designed to hold the doors in both "opened" and "closed" positions, properly adjusted to eliminate need for chain or cable style door stops. All compartment door hinges shall be Type 304, stainless steel polished piano style. Hinges shall be .060 inch material with 3/16 inch stainless pins and maximum knuckle length of 5/8 inch. Ail hinges to be bolted to the doors and body using 10-24 stainless steel Phillips head machine screws with self- locking nuts. All upper level compartments shall have the bottom door opening trimmed with polished stainless steel rub strips. Polished extruded aluminum drip mouldings shall be bolted in place, full length, above all compartment door openings. Drip mouldings to be fitted during body assembly with no holes drilled after finish painting. Polished extruded contour wheelwell mouldings to be provided bolted in position to properly trim left and right side body wheel well housings. The entire body, including all compartment doors, compartment corners, compartment roofs, compartment floors, cargo area roof, front body panels, etc. shall be of "bolted construction". Welded modular type construction or lighter than .125 inch materials in specified areas will not be accepted. The floors of all the runningboard level compartments are to be fabricated of polished 4-way .125 inch aluminum treadplate material and shall be of "sweep- out" design. Ail of the lower compartment floors shall be bolted in place and removable. The compartment floors above the rear wheel housings shall FIKE KESCUE SPECIFICATIONS also be of the "sweep-out" design. Left and right side front body compartment corners shall be bolted in position with minimum 3 inch radius corners for streamlined appearance. Polished stainless steel exterior compatment liners to be furnished covering radius of left and right front compartment corners. Left and right side rear compartment corners shall be of the "forward-slope" construction with top radius corners, bolted in position and removable from body sides. The left and right side wheelwells and upper wheelwell compartment floors to be of one-piece construction, bolted to body sides and removable. Wheelwell compartment door jambs, front and rear, shall be bolted in position, removed, painted individually, and reinstalled after finis~ painting. Left and right side compartment roofs, full length, to be fabricated construction bolted to side sheets and exterior body sides. All of the compartment door openings shall be double-broke, flanged on the sides, top and bottom and equipped with hollowcore extruded weatherstripping. Ail of the compartment interiors shall be equipped with individual 5 inch metal chromeplated 12 volt light fixtures, with automatic door switches. Lower/deep compartment areas, when obstructed by compartment'shelf, shall be equipped with additional interior compartment lighting located below shelving. Ail side compartments to be furnished with a minimum of two fabricated aluminum adjustable shelves with stainless steel track assemblies. The right and left front compartments and compartments above rear wheels shall be equipped with adjustable aluminum shelves, fabricated with double- broke.edges for maximum strength. Shelving tracks shall be fabricated of type 304 polished stainless steel. Clip-style adjustable shelving will not be accepted. The left front side compartment shall be equipped with two horizontal shelves, fully adjustable and designed to accomodate (Bidder to furnish) four individual vinyl tubes to store Oxygen "D" cylinders and two vinyl tubes to store MSA air tanks..~ Tubes to be installed on shelves so as to allow for maximum amount of'remaining compartment space. The left front side compartment shall also be equipped with a 20,000 BTU hot water heater with fan blower as specified. The left side wheel well compartment shall be equipped with two fully adjustable shelves, with additional ]2volt lights below shelves. A Ziamatic or equal walkaway air mask bracket shall be furnished and installed on the rear compartment door inner liner, properly braced. The left rear side compartment shall be equipped with one full length shelf, mounted in upper portion of the compartment to allow mounting of specified fire extinguishers in the lower portion, on the floor. The left rear side compartment shall be equipped with one upper shelf and the door inner liners to be braced for installation of accessory equipment. The right side wheel well compartment shall be equipped with two adjustable shelves and the rear door shall be equipped with air mask bracket (same as left FIRE RESCUE SPECIFICATIONS The right side front compartment shall be equipped with the following: A Hannay/Hurst type chrome plated electric rewind hydraulic hose reel shall be furnished and installed in the upper portion of the compartment, to the rear of the compartment. The reel shall be permanently, mounted to the rear compart- ment wail, designed to "payout" the hose from the top of the reel. Polished stainless steel hose rollers shall be furnished to properly guide the hose from the compartment interior. Two short hydaulic hoses with couplers shall be furnished by' Bidder for connection of above reel swivel joint to the Customer's Hurst Power Supply. Bidder shall also furnish and install two 50 foot lengths of double hydraulic hose with couplers, on the above specified hose reel. An adjustable shelf shall be furnished, located below the Hannay hose reel. A "pullout" galvanized steel tray shall be furnished, mounted on the floor of the compartment, equipped with Grant cadium plated roller slides and stainless steel mounting brackets. The tray shall extend at least 20inches, and shall be designed to accomodate the Customer's Hurst Power Supply and Customer's Hurst Spreaders. A round "cup" type mounting bracket shall be furnished by Bidder, for above spreader. The compartment door inner liner shall include a lower fabricated tray, designed to accomodate two pickhead axes. Chrome springloaded clip brackets for axe handles to be furnished by Bidder, mounted. The apparatus body shall extend from the rear of the chassis cab to the rear step area. Ther'e shall be fully enclosed compartments on each side of the body ahead of and behind the rear wheels and above the rear wheels. The compartments ahead of and behind the rear wheels shall be full height of the body and equipped with full height vertically hinged compartment doors. The compartments over the rear wheels, on each side of the body, shall be full height of the body and also equipped with double vertically hinged compartment doors. The right and left side front compartment shall be a minimum of 58 inches high, 30 inches wide, and 221/2 inch inside depth. The right and left rear compartment shall.be approximately 58 inches high, 38 inches wide, and 221/2 inches inside depth. The compartments on the left side and right side above the rear wheels shall be approximately 36 inches high, 48 inches wide, and 22~/2 inches inside depth. Polished stainless steel handrails with chrome plated brackets shall be furnished on each side of the body up the rear of the body. The handrails shall run on the extreme outside of the apparatus body, left and right sides. Body subframe shall be constructed qf heavy 3 inch extruded aluminum channel bolted to the chassis frame and removable. The lower subframe rear platform supports shall be fabricated of stainless or galvanized steel welded to the rear of the chassis frame rails for maximum strength and rigidity. The rear platform and side compartment floor supports shall be positioned so as to be approximately 20 - 22 inches above the ground level when the truck is fully flo¥ s FIRE RESCUE SPECIFICATIONS loaded. A minimum 36 inch wide 4-way polished aluminum treadplate cargo floor shall be furnished in the center of the body. The cargo floor shall extend from the rear tailboard area to'the extreme front of the apparatus interior cargo are. Sides and front of platform shall be formed up approxi- mately 4 inches for fabricated water-proof bottom corners. A full width rear step area shall be furnished between the body sides at the rear of the body, approximately l0 inches deep. The area between the canopy walk-way and lower rear step platform shall be covered with 4-way aluminum treadplate material and equipped with a weatherstripped hinged access door for access to a single steel rear towhook assembly welded to a chassis cross member in the center of the chassis frame rails. The rear compartment corners shall be equipped with a 5 inch high aluminum 4-way scuff plate full width of the compartment corner. A 4-way aluminum treadplate rubrail shall be furnished full l'~ngth of the apparatus body, protruding at least I/2 inch from the body sides. A large fully enclosed "cargo area" shall be furnished, located between the body sides, full length of the body. Cargo area shall be at least 36- inches wide x 102-inches long x 46-inches high. The cargo area roof shall be fabricated of 4-way polished aluminum treadplate material, properly supported to allow walking on the top of the body, and weather-proof. The rear of the cargo area shall be equipped with two weatherstripped vertically hinged 4-way aluminum "flush" compartment doors of the same construction specified for side compartment doors. Rear cargo doors shall provide a clear opening of at least 28-inches high and 30-inches wide. A 4-way aluminum treadpleate cargo floor shall be furnished, approximately 30-inches below the top of the body. Flo~r to be full length of the cargo area. Two full length "roll-out~' slides shall be f.urnished by Bidder, mounted to left and right sides.of the upper cargo area. Slides shall be designed to allow mounting of eight (8) MSA air harnesses and tanks, four on each side. The MSA harnesses and tanks shall "hook" to the roll-out slides, so as to allow removal and installation from the rear outside of the cargo area. Harness and tank mountings shall be designed to provide additional storage space, in the center of the upper cargo area, while the harnesses and tanks are inside the cargo area. A fabricated galvanize~ steel "roll-out" tray shall be furnished, installed below the upper cargo area floor. The tray shall be at least 30-inches wide x 6-inches deep x 96-inches long, equipped with extendible slides to allow extension out the rear of the body. The tray shall be furnished with chrome pull-bar and spring-loaded retainer assembly. Below the above specified pull-out tray, shall be installed individual slide- out trays for mounting of the Customer's furnished Duo-Safety Model 701-A, ' 12-foot extension ladder and two backboards. The backboards are 17-inches wide x 75-inches long and the ladder is ~3-inches wide x 90-inches long (nested). Backboards to be separated by dividers. The area below the ladder and backboard mountings shall be covered with 4-way aluminum material, above the body subframe cross members, full length of the cargo area. The rear of the specified ladder/backboard compartment and pull-out tray compartment shall be equipped with a full width "drop-down" style 4-way aluminum fabricated compartment door, with polished stainless piano hinge and chrome plated double point D-handle latch. FIRE RESCUE SPECIFICATIONS The interior of all above specified cargo areas shall be equipped with multiple interior 12-volt 5-inch compartment lights, controlled by automatic rear compartment door switches. A 20,000 BTU hot water type oxygen compartment heater, complete with blower, shall be furnished with operating switch located inside the cab area with indicator light. Heater to be plumbed to the engine cooling system. Two Ziamatic airmask brackets shall be furnished and mounted per the Customer's requirements oa the left and right wheel well compartment door interior braces. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT: A Smith & Wesson model 800 siren and S/S-1000 speaker shall be furnished and mounted on the cab with speaker located inside the specified light bar. The siren operating switch shall be located on the cab console. A Smith & Wesson model 8910, Super System light bar, 52 inches wide, with halogen bulbs and permanent mounting brackets to be furnished', mounted on chassis cab roof with operating switch on cab c°nso]e. Light bar to be equipped with red lenses and shaded areas to the rear. The Weldon 2020 strobe lightheads shall be furnished and mount to front of grill. A Whelen Universal Power Supply shall be furnished, located inside the chassis cab to power the specified Weldron strobe lightheads. Two Whelen strobe lights with red lens, model 1700 to be furnished, mounted on the top of the left and right rear body corners. Six chrome-plated 5 inch flush red clearance light assemblies shall be furnished and mounted, two on each side upper canopy corners and two at rear, upper canopy corners. All lights shall be of the alternating flashing design operated by a single switch located in the cab electrical console. Seven Signal Stat*dual element red marker lights, complete with chrome metal guards to be furnished. Lights to be located per Federal regulations. Two combination stop and tail lights at least 7 inches in diameter shall be mounted at rear of apparatus. Tail lights to include red lenses and chrome housings to be of the "flush" design. Two amber 7 inch diameter turn signals shall be furnished mounted at rear of body below specified stop/tail lights. Turn signal lights to be wired to front turn signals, not activated by brake lights. Two clear backup lights at least 7 inches in diameter shall be furnished and mounted at rear of body below specified turn signal lights. An electronic type reverse alarm shall be furnished mounted at rear of apparatus body, activated by reverse gear of truck transmission. FIRE RESCUE SPECIFICATIONS A Cole-Hersee model M705, rotary battery selector switch shall be furnished and mounted inside'the cab interior. Battery switch to be wired to the dual truck batteries so as to provide for dual battery system. Location of Cole-Hersee switch to be approved by the Fire Chief. Complete set-up 'for second battery - cables, brackets and battery, etc. to be furnished by the Bidder. An electrical switch console shall be fabricated and installed between bucket seats. Electrl.cal console shall provide mounting for all of the specified electrical switches. All of the emergency lighting switches shall be of the lighted rocker style, located on a single electrical switch panel with all functions properly identified with back-lit nametags. All emergency lighting and required ICC lighting shall be mounted in accordance with Federal and State highway standards. All wiring for specified lights and electrical equipment shall be suitably protected inside heavy electrical vinyl conduit from chassis cab to rear compartment interior. Conduit to be electrical PVC cOral)Icrc with pre- fabricated elbows and junction blocks as necessary. Conduit to be water- proofed and oversized to allow future installation of additional rear body wiring. A multiple unit fuse block shall be furnished inside chassis cab for use with all auxilliary circuits furnished by the body builder. Individual legend imprinted multi-stranded SXL automotive wires shall run from above fuse block, inside conduit, to a rear inside compartment mounted IO-wire junction block with smaller wire looms extending from junction block to individual light fixtures. All wiring to be individually identified, imprinted, with number and function and properly identified at the fuse block. All emergency lighting wires to be red and apparatus body accessory wiring to be black. A 4000 watt mobile electric power model, R-40 engine-driven generator shall be furnished and installed inside engine compartment driven by the chassis engine. Generator to be rigidly mounted to engine block with proper belt tightening device. A voltage control box to. be furnished, installed inside chassis cab, complete with voltage meter. A fr%quency control unit to be furnished and install'ed for proper voltage/frequency control during all engine speeds. Generator to be wired to the rear body accessories, using approved 110 volt loom and wiring devices. Two 500-watt telescoping quartz floodlights to be furnished and mounted at front of body, one on each side. Lights to be equipped with individual switches located below the light in the apparatus body compartments. Two l l0-volt plugin receptacles to be furnished inside front body compartments, each side, in same receptacle box as light switch. FINISHING: During the apparatus construction, all permanently mounted components shall be back primed prior to final assembly with vinyl wash primer and zinc chromate primer. Tectyl rustproofing and butyl sealant shall be applied over above primer coats prior to final installation of flanged areas'. All chrome accessories and electrical fixtures shall be installed during body construction, removed for painting, and reinstalled after finish painting. The chassis wheels, compartment doors, compartment shelves, compartment door liners, and canopy cab door shall be removed and all items painted separately to assure even heavy coats of primer and finishing paints. After construction and disassembly, the entire metal exterior shall be washed~ FIRE RESCUE SPECIFICATIONS with wax and silicone remover and properly sanded to remove ali excess primer, caulking, grease, 'surface dirt, etc. The prepared surfaces shall then be primed with vinyl wash. primer and top coated with synthetic base primer containing corrosion resistant pigments and. resins. Finishing coats shall-be applied using non-sanding primer'and minimum of two coats of acrylic enamel wlth.urethene hardeners. All individual painted accessory components to receive the same triple-system painting application. After final finich painting, all underbody areas including wheelwells shall be properly caulked with non-hardening butyl sealant. Underbody seams to be caulked after enamel top coats, to. assure maximum corrosion protection. Entire underside of apparatus body and wheelwells to be spray coated with an approved rust- proofing material after final assembly of all body components. Color must match 4 door cab. Interiors of all side compartment to be spray coated with light reflective vinyl paint. Four-way aluminum treadplate components shall be removed prior to painting and properly caulked prior to reinstallation. Full inner door pans shall be caulked with silicone sealant prior to final installation with stainless steel fasteners. Two full quarts of original finish color shall be provided for use as future touchup paint. Lettering to be genuine Gold Leaf, suitably shaded. Decorating and striping to be in keeping with this lettering. Lettering to be placed on each cab door per Customer's instructions. All body striping shall be 3M Scotchcal gold with black trim lines'. ' A 2 inch wide Scotchlite reflective strip shall be installed, approximately 2 inches above runningboard level full length of apparatus ~ody, left and right sides. Scotchlite stripe to be used in conjunction with a full length horizontal gold body stripe immediately above runningboard level. oV7 MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT: A full length, polished 4-way aluminum fabricated cab runningboard, with integral front mud flap shall be furnished, left and right sides. An 8000 lb. capacity Ramsey or Warn electric remote controlled winch to be furnished, recessed behind front Chevrolet bumper. Winch to include ~50 ft. of 5/16" cable, grab hook, ~0 ft. remote control cable and switch, and recessed style roller fairlead. One each ABC (20 pound) dry chemical fire extinguisher to be furnished with runningboard bracket mounted. One each C02 (20 pound) fire extinguisher to be furnished with runningboard bracket mounted. Mount brush guard furnished by Fire Department. Class #2 receiver 2" x 2" for trailer hitch per Fire Dept. specifications. Separate switch to activate back-up lights without activating reverse alarm. Switch to be located on console. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT; Charles weed,'600 N~rth Lilac, Apt. 100, Golden V~l'lev. ~N. 55446 September ,986 ' ' InspectiOn of home at 4519 Sh°r~eHne Drive, Spring Park, Minnesota, to be moved into the City of Mound When a structure is moved or relocated, it must conform to the requirements for a new structure under the provisions of the Uniform Buildlng .Code, State of Minnesota,' Section 104. I have made an inspection on September lOth and August 28th of the structure and I have found the following alterations, replace- ments and repairs which mUst be made to this structure, if relocated into the City of Mound. 1. A moving permit for the City of Mound would be obtained by a State 1.1censed house mover in the amount of $50.00 plus proof of insurance and cash deposit or bond to move structures over City streets. 2. Yard grading including sodding, sidewalks, new house ent~ry stoops are to be provided. 3. A new foundation would be required under this structure with beam and sup- port system in compliance with the Building Code; the structure would be properly anchored, damp proofing applied, and foundation insulatlon properly placed where necessary. 4. construction blueprints would be required to permit approval of the alter- ations to floor plan, heating layout, survey, information as per attached; a cross section, foundation, energy calculations as per new construction information is attached for your convenience. 5. The new site would require 2 off street parking stalls (650 square feet of area minimum); the survey would require an indication of the future garage if an accessory buildlng were not planned at the time of the building re- location. 6, Provide a new basement stairways and handrails to code. 7. Insulation of the structure must met model energy code, 1982 Edition of the State Buildlng Code (see attached energy calculation worksheet). Due to the amount of work required to bring the inspecte~ structure up to current building code requirement, it is my recommendation that the building not be relocated into the City of Mound. in the a0miss~on or access to or treatment or em~toymentin.,ts programs and activities. LETTER TO: Charles Need September 12, 1986 - Page 2. The exter!or of.the dwelling W°uld'requl~e.new Stoops and.entry stairways, the existing attached garage would be removed, the.existing hardboard siding is in fair to.poor condition and would. be removed from the. st.ructure,.the existing'roof.covering is in~poor.Condition..with the second floor i'ndicat.ing Signs of water l.eakage., the brickCh.imneY'is' deteriorated-and-wouldneed to be removed at,least, to the roof line.. The.existing structure, has aluminum .combination storms and screens in poor condition wi:th the'-windows:.being .approxi- mately 25 years, ol.d In ·need of putty',-pa'i'nt'and Some.signs of rot'.deterioratlon, exterior doors are'in poor·condition.wi.th, the frames and storms needingreplace- ment and repal,.r. :The rafters-are. 2 .by ~,. 16 inch'on center; with.evidence o~. water penetrat.ion.-frOm the roofing and'a'.sag.[n the roof from. undetermined cause is evident at. the'time of..my..:inspection.,' possibly~.from improPe.r-.ties to the dor'mer portion that was not.~isible at.the time of my insPection. The upper level sleepi.ng rooms an.d..bath Were acoustica'l tLle ceill.~gs, showing signs of water·stain,. paneling throughout:hallway, bedrooms, with.all painted woodwork needing'.repair, The wlndows.i~.the upper level had no hardware handles nor locks. Interior doors and hardwa're'were in poor COndition throughout the upper level, The second floor fl0or Joists Were 2 by 10, 16 inch'on center'. Waste and vent..piping, water Piping, water heater and~exlsting gas piping, were in good to fair condition, All .sewer and. water connections into the .home must meet Minnesota.Plumbing Code mjnimum"standard for new ~onstruction. All e]ectrlcal.wiring, must..meet~current.198q Nati. onal.iE]ect~ic~Code; instalI ground fault interrUp.tioh.where required, 20 amp kitchen' circuit, 3 eiectricaliy wired smoke alarms adjacent to sleeping areas'and i'n basement with interconnec- tion, etc. ' The forced air gas furnace,'air ConditiOning, humidifier and air cleaner are approximately.lO years old. 137HBTU furnace would-require testing of the' heat exchanger' by a licensed contraCtor:to assure the heat exchanger is in good condition as we11'as all. safety .control'.s on the heating plant for.proper opera- tion of the' furnace including installation of a combustion air duct from the outside, The~first floor bathroom toward the nort-h bedroom would require com- plete removai'.and renovation. The floor coverings are in good to fair condi- tion. The-kitchen cupboards and appliances are in good condition. The wood- work and doors would need to be sanded, varnished and/or pain.ted two coats. The f!replace was fire damaged in 1977. A permit was obtained for repair. The structure had'an addltion put on-in 1977 according to Spring Park permit records. During my last inspection of September' loth, I mentioned to you that my decision would be not to allow the home to be relocated into-Hound. However, you would have the option of appealing my decision to the City Council' If you choose to go before the City Council With your request, please contact our City Hanager's office, Mr. Ed Shukle. He will arrange for you to have a hearing before the City Council. ' If I can be of any further assistance or if you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at my office, ~72-1155. Encl. cc: City Hanager City of Mound 534; Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 To Whom it May Concern: Re: Request for a New Street Light on Canary Lane We, the residents of the 1500 block on Canary Lane, Mound, MN, are in agreement that another street light be added to our street as soon as possible. We feel that a light should be put in somewhere near the top of the hill. This area is completely unlit by the lights that are at the beginnin~ and the end of the block. Also, since this street leads into the public beach, we feel that an extra light would prevent any loitering in the.evening and night hours by people that go down to the beach. We would appreciate your action on this matter as soon as possible. Thank you. Residents of ;500 block of Canary Lane: Name ! Address LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 September 2, 1986 To: From: Subject: Acting Chief Hudson Officer Ewald Street light on Canary Lane I contacted the residents of the 1500 block on Canary Lane in regard to their request for a street light on their street. Listed below are their concerns. ADDRESS 1550 Canary Lane NAME Chuck Champine 1551 Canary Lane Willard & Myrt Hillier 1564 Canary Lane Paul & Ginny Erickson 1567 Canary Lane Ron & Gerry Chase 1574 Canary Lane Katherine Niccum Kelly & John Friedmeyer 1578 Canary Lane CONCERNS It is very dark in the area and a number of children ride their bicycles. It is so dark toward the center. Some people live alone. Very dark and would like a street light for safety reasons. They have three small children; elderly people in the area. It is very dark. They have one child and their four grandchildren visit quite often. Very dark and she lives alone. Parkers in the area. Teenagers stay late in the area. Very dark. Two children. Teen- agers park in the area. Would like a street light for security reasons. 1582 Canary Lane Telephone has been disconnected. It does appear that someone lives there, but I was unable to make contact. Subject: Street light on Canary Lane NAME Lyle & Elaine Ash ADDRESS 1586 Canary Lane CONCERNS No children. Because it is so dark they are concerned about break ins. Marty R. Austinson 1598 Canary Lane So dark. They have two children. Concerned about the children coming and going to the beach. In closing, I feel that there is a definite need for a street light on the 1500 block of Canary Lane. If I can be of any further help please let me know. WOOD b /~ MD Ro/a D Information for September 30, 1986 Council Meeting September 22, 1986 LICENSE RENEWAL -- Expired 6-30-86. Set-Up Mound Lanes 2346 Cypress Lane Mound, Minn. New License Period 7-1-86 to 6-30-87 NEW LICENSE APPLICATION Pool Table 1--Donnies on the Lake PHONE 612-296-6159 5564 Charles Carlson Mound Lanes 2346 Cypress Lane Mound, MN 55364 IF NAME AND ADDRESS SHOWN ARE NOT CORRECT, MAKE CHANGES IN SPACES BELOW. NOTE: ALL 'ON-SALE' INTOxiCATING LIQUOR LICENSEE'S ARE EXEMPT FROM APPLYING. FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS: Partnership. State the Name end Address of Each Partner; If 8 Cor~oratlofl, State the Name and Address of E/ch Officer. Business Partner/Officer Businlss Partner/Officer Date Club Organlzecl ' Cength of Time C~ub At Present Locatfon~ "Club Officer/Director Name ' Ctub Officer/Director Name Club Offlcer/Oiractor Name jNumber of Members J Amount of DUes I FOR A PRI~ ~ATE clue Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; if corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer'or director, ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details UNLESS APPROVED AS PROVIDED BELOW: IF THI~ BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A COUNTY: I hereby certify that the answers ere true of my OWn knowledge and understand that the giving of false information or the failure to give pertinent information constitutes c~use for revocation of this permit. ANY PERMIT ISSUED HEREUNDER DOES NOT ALLOW THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR. IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A MUNICIPALITY (in. Ditek,/ 'Approved -'Council P. fes dent or Reprelentlt va' .., IF A CLUB A~-I'ACH A COPY OF THE CONSTITUTION AND BYLAWS OF THE CLUB AND A CURRENT LIST OF MEMBERS. CASH, CHECK BILLS .......... SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Computer Computer Computer Run ..dated 9/18/86---Batch 86q091 Run dated 9/2q/86---Batch 86q092 Run dated 9/25/86---Batch 86q093 126,935.37 99,562.87 30,600.46 257,098.70 Buffalo Bituminous--Final--Bartlett Blvd Bottle Basket ....... Supplles for Reserve Dance II II II II Jaunich Enterprises- Pepsi/7Up Bottling-- " " " " Lake Upholstery ..... Reupholster chai rs-pol ice Adventure Pub 1 i cat i Ohs--Tree Handbook--Pa rks 2,Blq.59 27q.30 '90.OO 111.30 179.00 69.50 Total Bills 260,637.39 0 Z 000000000 000000000 # ,Il. ZZ UJ~J F... ~- bJW mm i. ,IF ii. \ Z z Z Z ':" Z ZZZ n, n- fw 0000000000 C 0 I o o o I Z Z 'ir' ..J 0 I,,- Cc: I-,- I- Z UJ Z: o uJ T oooOoooOoo Z UJ 0000000000000 000 I I I I I I ZZ UJklJ I I I I O~ I I _J,~ (0 Z U n- O 0 * * i~Cd * O.J 0~0~ oo · e . · CIJOJ I- 41. I I- 0 0 m · o · Z o'1 0 O~ 0 0 Z 0 Z .d Z o z 0 0 n 0 X n- ldo ~J~ · I I oo .J UJ n~ 0 _] 0 Ill )- 0 Z i-4 ..J Z 0 0 · O~ n O, X 0 X UJ ~o ~OJ oo Z o Ld Z 0 Z 0 0000 · Z ~,~ Z O~ bJ 0 t~ Z f, (0 Z oo ¥¥ LU Z ti, · T # .J hJ bJ Ill Z' .J hJ N Z I- I Z 0 Z I 0 h- ZZ Ci hi Z O0 O0 ~00000000~ ~ O~ O~ O~ 0 0 0 LL W W cC (J U n Z 0 -r' ~ .:3 0 ::C .J 0 hi .J Z: Z .J 0 LU ..J )- 0 r/' ~J ld T T T I I, i ..I I.iJ .J Z Z 0 (~J OJ ~ Z 0 oo 0 0 OO O0 Z 0 Ld Z 0 L~ 0 >- I I-. Z 0 ~- x J G= 0 I-- .J..J :3::3 ZZ I I OL~ I I O0 000000000 000000 0000 0000 0 ~ ~ I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0~__000_~0~0~0~000~0 ~~~~00~00 0000~~~00~ I I I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I ooooooooooooo~~ I| I ~ 0 o00 ~ ~ 0oo II I III I1' I III I- )- Z o -I W Z _,1 0 N .d Z n~ 0 'r Ld C' b"~ LA b9 b9 'I' Z 0 b. ltU ZZ I1~11 T TiT T o hi Z b. Z 0 N ,..J Z Z /: OJ I I h I'-- I Z ' \ .J O0 0 0~0 ~ I '1 I o o Z 0 I Z Z Ld UJ n n i UJ .:.. m Z ,,~ m, O0 oO 0 o 00ooo00000 0000000000 t.- Z 0 Z 0 000000 000 ~ .d Z LU Z Z W W W OZOZ 0000 0 0 bJ Z-. Mound Recycles 5314 Maywood Road / Mound, Minnesota / 472-1251 Vohume 1- Number 2 August 1986 RECYCLING IN THE CITY OF MOUND FUNDING The City of Mound established a city-wide curbside recycling program in October of 1985. Curbside pick- up is the first Friday of the month with a drop-off site in the parking lot across from the Mound Post Office every third Saturday of the month. In the first 6 months of the year, 132,420 pounds of recycled material has been received from the Mound January ~., 1988 it will be mandatory that every city have some sort of recycling program, be it compost- ing, curbside pickup or just a drop-off site. Thanks to all the residents that participate in Mound's Recycling Program puts us ahead of our time. Also beginning in 1990 state law prohibits burial of unprocessed trash in regional landfills. Metropolitan counties are planning and building processing facilities that will recover energy from trash by burning it or producing fuel for burning. Mound's Recycling Program is funded 50% of Henne- pin County Department of Environment & Energy. From Metropolitan Council we receive $4.00 per ton for recycled material picked up; also once a year we receive 50¢ per household from Metropolitan Council. Hennepin County has established a source separa- tion goal of 16% for each city in Hennepin County. Mound has been estimated to have a total waste gen- eration rate of 3,862 tons yearly. Mound is now recycling 4% of this. Hennepin County pays 50% of recycling costs when 0-5% of the waste generation is picked up, they will pay t50% for 5-10%, 70% for 1.0-16%, and if over 1.6% they will pay 80% of net operating costs. At this time Hennepin County i~ working with the City of Minnetrista to develop a com- post site. Yard waste would help Mound to reach its required 16%. RECYCLING CALENDAR September 1986 October 1986 November 1986 M T W T F S S M T W T F $ S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4Q6 1 2Q4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 S 6 G 8 14 15 16 17 18 19[~ 12 13 14 15 16 17~ 9 10 11 12 13 14[~] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [] - Drop-off site 0 -- Curbside pickup December 1986 SM T W T F S I 2 3 4[~]6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19[~ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. PREPARING MATERIALS FOR RECYCLING REDUCING WASTE THROUGH SMART SHOPPING Materials to be recycled must be clean and kept in separate paper bags or boxes. The following simple preparations take only a few minutes each day and assist greatly in processing your materials to be recy- cled. MATERIAL PREPARATION {~NEWSPAPER Bundle in boxes or bags, or tie. with twine. When you are shopping, think about keeping waste out of your garbage can. Here are some suggestions: · Buy soft drinks, milk or beer in returnable/refillable containers (it usually costs less than in throwaway containers). GLASS: (clear, green or brown bottles) METALS: (Steel, aluminum and tin cans, foil and food trays) CLEAN RAGS AND Remove all metal rings, caps and lids. Separate by color and do not break. Paper labels may be left on. Rinse for sanitary reasons. CAR PARTS · Avoid disposable products. · Purchase large economy size items. · Select quality products that will last and review warranties before buying. Our landfills are full of "bargain" products. · Buy products and packing made from recycled and recyclable materials (metal, glass and paper). TIRES: The Mound Public Works De- partment has a trailer for used tires. Cost: $1.00 per tire. · Avoid plastics where possible. NO WASTE OIL: It seems to be more appropriate for local business to accept the waste oil. Harrison's Bay Mobil in Mound and Crown Auto in Spring Park will accept used oil. STICKERS ARE AVAILABLE FOR YOUR CALENDAR BY CALLING 472-1251 ANYONE WISHING TO PUT UP A LAWN SIGN ONCE A MONTH, PLEASE CALL 472-1251 MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 Present were: Chair Elizabeth'Jensen; Commissioners William Meyer, Geoff Michael, 'Thomas Reese, Kenneth Smith, William Thal and Frank Weiland; Council Representative Steve Smith; City Manager Ed Shukle; City Planner Mark Koegler; Building Official Jan Bertrand and Secretary Marjorie Stutsman. Also present were the foil.owing interested persons: Douglas O. Coleman, Lee and Rosemary Luedke, Dan Martin, Tom and Judy Ess, Gary Sonntag, Mavis Sonntag, George Sonntag, Viola Sonntag, Fred Asher, Norma Asher, Adrian Sainio, Rich Sathre, Nancy Schroeder, Warren Oavidson and Bradley and Janlce Brlstol. M i NUTES The minutes of' the Planning Commission meeting of August 25, 1986 were presented for consideration. Chair densen asked that her name be spelled correctly; Commis- sioners Ken Smith and .Will lam'Meyer were absent; Meyer was excused; also In Case Number 86-$3q, she would like l't mentioned that Mr. Hille indicated Mrs. Hoag was agreeable to the granting of a 2. foot variance; also Mr. Podany was agreeable to the 2 foot variance. The last correction i's that that City Manager would put to- gether a letter to promote' citizen participation In the Planning.Commission to be published In the Laker. Weiland moved and.Reese seconded a motion to .approve the minutes as corrected and changed. The Vote was unanimously In favor of approving the minutes as amended. BOARD OF APPEALS i. Cases.No. 86-541 & 86-542 Public Hearing on Subdivision of Land and Variance for'46XX Lakeside Lane; Lots 1 to 6, inclusive, including vacated Ivy Lane, Block 10; and Lot 3, Bl°ck ~, all In Shadywood Point Tom and Judy Ess, Richard Sathre of Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. and Dan Martin were present. FarkKoegler, City Planner, reviewed his report Stating proposal is to divide Lots 1 and 6, Block 10', Shadywood Point and all of vacated Ivy Lane into two building sites. Lots meet all the Zoning Code requirements except the.60 foot minimum lot width at the building line. Transfer of Lot 3 without the eastern po~tlon of vacated IvY Lane causes that parcel to need a lot width variance also. Without the vacated eastern half of Ivy Lane, the access to proposed Lots 1 and 2 would only be 11-12 feet wide. He is recommending approval of the'prel.imihary plat and lot width variances with certain condl- tions. Jan Bertrand, Building Offlclal, reviewed the Engineer's report which comments on Grading & Drainage Plan (a low area near proposed driveway should be filled and this would need permission from the O~ner of Lot 7); Preliminary Plan and Utility Plan and the deficient unit charges and bls recommendations. The Building Official clarified that this public hearing was for both preliminary and final plat approval so applicant would not have to go through twice. The Chair opened the public hearing and the following persons had comments: NANCY SCHROEDER, owner of Lot 2, Block 9, Shadywood Point, stated she wanted it known that there is no access to benefit Lot 3 across her lot; she is cur- rently marketing the lot and sees no way for an easement to be allowed. Plannlng Commission Minutes September 8, 1986 - Page 2 RICH SATHRE of Sathre Bergquist stated hls. C~mpany is helping Ess plat the prop- ertY. He had drawing 'of lots.and stated there is 11 feet from house on Lot 3 to lot line of Lot 2; one could get around to a garage site on lakeside, but house is not set back far enough to bui'ld a garage on the street side. What they are trying to'do is create a sh~red area of two lots for entrance; Ess' would have a strlp, o~ land one way and the Mart|nls, who propose to buy and bui]d on Lot i, would own the other little piece of the vacated Ivy Lane. The Ess' sold Lot 3 without including the lO foot strip of Ivy. Lane that was'vacated. The Commission questioned that the County has not notified City.of transfer and the status of that ten feet and that that division makes Lot 3 nonconforming... The Commission discussed the. proposal at length. It was noted that Ess' acquired a corner of Lot 7 to get.the full 20 feet of vacated Ivy Lane. FRED ASHER questioned the number of lots that woUld be ~esul't of this division. There were no other comments or questions, the Chair closed the public hearing. Thal moved and Heyer seconded a .motion .that the Commission recommend approval with the stipulations by-the staff. The vote was unanlmously in favor. Hotion carried. A public hearing has been set by the City Council for September 30, 1986. Case No. 86-543 Public Hear.ing on Proposed Utility Easement Vacation Lot 2, Block 15~ Devon 'Applicant, David Price, could.not' be present. The Building 0ffic-ial, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the vacation request. Originally, mortgage difficu'lties came up on sel]ing of this property because of the garage being located on the easement. Hr. Price, Attorney for the owner, Sandra Nelson, has tried to have the utilltles fle]d located to see whether or not some of the easement could be relinquished. The Engineer has reviewed the survey and is recom- mending that we can vacate l0 feet to get the garage out of easement and retain the other ten feet. Minnegasco will be locating gas main (if any) prior to the Council hearing. The Building Offi.cial stated Mr. Price asked if the Commission could make a recommendation at this meeting'in order to move request along. Weiland moved to table and then retracted the motion; he stated he was not comfor- table voting when the Commission did not have all the information. The Chair opened the public hearing and as no one present had any comments or ques- tions, she closed the public hearing. The Commission had various questions they discussed, such as age of structures and ~ when easement was signed and how this could happen, etc. Reese moved and Steve Smith seconded a motion to vacate the Northerly 10 feet of the easement subject to determination by the staff that no utilities currently exist in the Northerly 10 feet of the easement. Weiland voted nay (not enough information) and all of the others voted in favor. Motion carried. The public hearing has been set for September 30, 1986 Council meeting. Plannlng Commission Minutes September 8, 1986 - Page 3 Case No. 86-544 Front Yard Setback Variance for 5421Tonkawood Road NWly. 100 feet of Block 1, and all land between, extensions into Lake Minnetonka of the NW & SE, excepting the SWly. 75 feet of Block l, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park PID # 13-117-24 32 0001 Leroy and Rosemary Luedtke were present, and also Douglas Coleman. The Building Official, Jan~Ber~rand, reviewed the reques't for a front, yard variance to allow construction of an addition'to the Northwestern portion of their home, 14 by 32 feet, to balance out the addition to. Southeasterly part of house. The staff recommends' approval of the requested 15 foot front yard variance.dUe to the relocation of the improved right-of-way and.. the averaging of the adjoining neighbor's structure. DOUGLAS COLEMAN of 2100 Noble Lane objected to the variance because of the loss of the 1ak,view. ROSEMARY LUEDTKE stated'that the'.trees in front of her property virtually block the view through the Property; .Mr. Coieman still has the view of the lake over the commons from his property and deck. She stated they have one of the smaller lakeshore homes; one story. The Commission discussed the request and what was private lakeshore and Com- mons. Mr. Coleman asked when Waterside Commons became private 1ak,shore? Tha] moved and Ke~ Smith seconded a motion to .recommend approval of the requested variance; The vote was: Steve Smith, Thal, Ken Smith, Michae] and Jensen in ·favor with Meyer, Re,se and Weiland voting nay. Motion carries by a 5 to 3 vote. This will be on the City Council agenda for September 30, 1986. '- Case No. 86-545 Variance recogni'zing the existing nonconforming lake front setback to allow construction of a detached garage; Lots 8 and 29, Block 6, Woodland Point Bradley and Janice Bristol were present. The City Planne~, Mark Koegler, reviewed his report stating applicants want to build a tota]ly conforming detached garage. Situation is that thls lot does abut the Commons and the house sits ]0 feet away from the rear proPerty ]in, (Commons) and the northeast corner of the deck touches the property line. The Chair questioned if house and deck were in plaCe before the setbacks were established. The Building 0fficia] gave some background on the house. The interior was remodeled, but the house and deck were there. The Commission discussed house numbers missing on quite a few properties and they had'dif- ficu]ty finding property. Wei]and moved and Meyer seconded a motion to approve the requested variance. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. This will be on the City Council agenda for September 30, 1986. Planning Comm~sslon Minutes September 8, 1986 - Page Relative to house numbers, the Building Official stated a firm is. proposing to paint house numbers on the. curb for a fee. Commissioner Thai thlnks Police Depart- ment should do educational feature on importance of house numbers and advise home owners without numbers about ordinance. The Commission discussed the following items: Vote on variance for 5q21 Tonka- wood Road including that MF~ Coleman had been turned down for a variance sometime ago; the anchoring of home at 2914 Bradford Road and various other cases. ADJOURNMENT Reese moved and Meyer seconded~a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 P.M. were in favor,, so meeting was.adjourned. All Elizabeth Jensen, Chair Attest: CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR AUGUST 1986 FINANCIAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 16, 1~86 The following departments are over budget through 2/3 of budget year: Council (70.3%) Conferences and schools exceed b~dget amount by $2800. Assessing (96.3%) In August we paid Hennepin County $37,053 for our contract for assessing services. The LOGIS costs for assessing also is exceeding budgeted amounts. Streets (74.0%) Two accounts are the main factors in the streets being over budget. Equipment Parts Yr. Budget $7000 - Ex. thru Aug. $6997. St. Maint. Materials Budget $19,000 - Ex. thru Aug $21,950 Parks part-time personnel have returned to school. Expenses will decrease in the remaing months of the year. Since the first quarter (watermain breaks), the expenses have been held down. If the trend continues, the water fund may be on budget come year end. Parks (68.4%) Water (69.8%) JN:ls An eoual opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. CITY OF HOUND 1986 BUDGET REPORT REVENUES August 1986 66.7% of Year GENERAL FUND BUDGET Taxes $ 931,061 Intergovernmental 719,964 Business Licenses 13,060 Non-Business Licenses & Permits 114,000 General Gov't Charges 27,750 Court Fines 82,000 Charges to other Departments 23,000 Other Revenue 55~OO August YTD REVENUE REVENUE VAR I ANCE 465,515 465,546 33,373 380,139 339,825 70 7,913 5,147 PER CENT RECEIVED 50.0 52.8 60.6 8,806 89,168 24,832 78.2 1.:,140 10,749 17,001 38.7 10,465 51,190 30,810 62.4 808 17~733 5,267 77.1 3,783 16,793 38,507 30.4 TOTAL REVENUE $1,966~135 58,445 1,O39,200 926,935 52.6 Federal Revenue Sharing '45~OO0 23,199 21,801 Liquor Fund 820,000 76,097 500,211 319,789 Water Fund 264,000 13,695 181,632 82,368 Sewer Fund 500,000 34,583 361,607 138,393 51.6 61 .O 68.8 72.3 CITY OF MOUND 1986 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURES August 1986 66.7% of Year BUDGET UNEN- Auoust YTD CUMBERED EXPENSE EXPENSE BALANCE PER CENT EXPENDED GENERAL FUND Council $ 36,964 City Manager/Clerk 89,273 Elections & Reg. 10,307 Assessing 43,369 Finance 141,420 Legal 80,330 Cable T.V. ---- Contel 20,000 Recycling 18,585 Police Protection 568,199 Planning & Insp. 100,333 Civil Defense 3,000 Streets 369,950 Shop & Store 47,096 City Property 83,449 Parks 130,093 Contingency 50,000 Transfers 75,741 6,919 25,971 6,039 58,329 351 1,214 37,476 41,784 10,308 91,431 7,759 45,486 925 1,701 2,748 10,128 3,075 8,505 39,637 364,290 8,865 63,315 247 1,093 26,557 273,884 3,773 31,166 4,652 53,349 12,184 88,937 --- 3,43'1 6,312 51,688 10,993 30,944 9,093 1,585 49,989 34,844 (1,70l) 9,872 10,O80 203,909 37,018 1,907 96,066 15,930 30,.100 41,156 46,569 24,053 70.3 65.3 11.8 96.3 64.7 56.6 50.6 45.8 64.1 63.1 36.4 74.O 66.2 63.9 68.4 6.9 68.2 GENERAL FUND TOTAL $1,868,109 177,827 1,215,701 652,408 65.1 Federal Reserve Sharing 52,000 Area Fire Service 142,802 Sealcoat Program --- CBD Assessment --- 7,048 32,349 102,580 19,651 40,222 62.2 71.8 Liquor '153',450 10,499 97,214 56,346 63.3 Water 315,O22 11,O80 219,942 95,080 69.8 Sewer 631,O84 45,318 390,350 240,734 61.9 Cemetery 3,896 214 2,167 1,729 55.6 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES POLICY ADOPTION MEETING We're making a change... WHAT The League will adopt legislative policies in November this year, instead of at the beginning of the legislative session. WHY Adopting policies earlier will give League members and lobbyists an opportunity to contact legislators and draft legislation concerning city policies before the legislative session begins. Please note that the League will continue to hold the Legislative Conference as before with in-depth workshops on legislative issues, comments from legislators, and a reception .for legislators and city officials. That conference will be on March 10, 1987. WHERE The policy adoption meeting will be at the Sheraton Midway-St. Paul off of Hwy. g4 (400 N. Hamline Ave.) WHEN Thursday, November 20, 1986 at 9 a.m. WHO All member cities should try to attend.. Each city has a vote. COST There is NO EEE for this mc~t~ng, however, advance registrations wiU enable us to plan for the appropriate number of participants. AGENDA 9:00 - 10:00 a.m. Registration (coffee & rolls) 9:15 - 9:45 a.m. Pre-conference policy briefing 10:00 a.m .... Policy adoption Lunch is on your own. So, mark your calendars . . . Nov. 20 Policy adoption meeting March 10 Legislative conference REGISTRATION FORM City: L E A S E Legislative policy adoption meeting Thursday, November 20, 1986 Sheraton Midway St. Paul 400 North Hamline St. Paul, MN 55104 Contact Person: Telephone ~: A.C. P R I N T Name Title Address Zip Code Send registration to Gayle Brodt, League of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Ave. East, St. Paul, MN 55101 Sheraton Midway- St. Paul 400 North Hamline, St. Paul, Mi~-~s~-$5104 (6U) 64 -U34 Name Representing Address _ City State Zip League of Minnesota Cities November 20, 1986 To insure space/rate availability, please respond prior to November 1, 1986. Please. Specify: .. $56.00 + Tax Single (One Person) $56.00 + Tax Double (TWo People) NTH DAY YEAR ARRIVAL TIME ARRIVAL DATE CHECK IN TIME CHECK OUT TIME JMONTHI DAY j YEAR J DEPARTURE DATE 3:00 PM 1:00 PM I will arrive after 4:00 P.M. Please guarantee the reservation with: (Credit Card) Number and Expiration Date ( Telephone # STUDY OF RATE STRUCTURE FOR SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGE (SAC) YEARS 1986 - 2010 METROPOLITAN WASTE CON?ROL 'COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JOINT MC-MWCC STUDY JUNE 1986 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOF~ENDATIONS SUMMARY The Metropolitan Council and Commission have conducted a joint- study of the Service Availability Charge (SAC) sYstem for the purpose-of recommending a future schedule of rates as part of the Commission's cost allocation program. The SAC system was established in 1973 to pay for the cost of providing reserve capacity. SAC is collected in the 105 communities served by the Metropolitan Disposal System at the time a building permi~'£s granted or a sewer connection permit is issued for a building existing prior to 1973. SAC revenues pay for that portion of the Commission's total annual debt service allocated to reserve capacity. The study responds to the ComMission's Rate Structure Ta~k Force recommendations relative to the rate setting methodology which affects the SAC 'system and its a~ministration and to Council recommendations to evaluate the SAC fund, rate and future financial requirements. -' The purpose guide the Commission in establishing future SAC rates. evaluates the immediate and future ability of the SAC of this study is tO provide a planning document to The ~tudy system to ~inance the reserve capacity portion of the Commission's debt service. It is intended that the study be updated at.least biennially to consider changes in the SAC reguirement and revenue. The study examines-the'SAC rate, fu:d balance and other relevant issues affecting the SAC policy. These .factors were reviewed as they relate to the.present cost allocation system (six sewer service areas) and the proposed cost allocation system (one sewer service area including current value credit as part of the debt service) recommended by the Rate Structure Task Force and proposed to the 1986 Minnesota Legislature. A historical overview of trends in the SAC system since 1973 shows that the annual SAC revenues increased from approximately $4 million to $10 million in 1985, as the rate increased from $275 to $425 (the rate increased to $475 in 1986). Annual' SAC requirements approximately (reserve capacity debt service) increased from $4 million to $7 million in the 13-year period. revenues appears to exceed the debt service this period, there was a deficit fund balance . Although t~e growth in requirements over in the first four years. been maintained, and the fund balance was $27.6 million at the end of 1985. Since 1977, a positive fund balance has The study examined briefly several related ~AC policies and issues including changes in the area of SAC collection, the financial effect and issues related to a potential SAC rebate program, and the size of the fund balance to be maintained. of these affect the need for future' SAC rate increases. The potential financial impact of the change in the collection of SAC .from the Metropolitan.Sewer Service Region All (MSSR) to an area where development will be connected immediately to a municipal sewer system as recommended by the MWCC Rate Structure Task Force was evaluated. SAC revenue.would be reduced by an .~FL estimated 3 ~o 5 per cent each year by this change. The reduced .revenue was considered in that the projected SAC units were based on sewered households. The proposed changes in the area of collection raises the issue as to whether SAC collected since 1973 for development which has not received sewer service should be rebated to the communities where SAC was collected. A preliminary estimate inaicates the cost would be approximately $5 million, which would the SAC fund balance. proposed 1987 rate of which is about be pa~d from This amount was determined based on the $500 per SAC unit paid for 10,000 units, 4 per cent of all previously c611ected SAC. The study indicated there are several issues and questions related to the establishment of a rebate program which are outside the purpose of the study and require further analysis before a decision is made. These include an examination of the legal issues and implications for other Commission decisions; the availability of Commission and local government records to verify previous SAC payments; th~ area in which rebates should be granted, particulariy if local sewers are to be extended in the near future; the SAC rate and interest to be paid; and the costs including administrative, ko implement the program. That portion of the Commission's annual debt service costs which is allocated to reserve capacity-is paid from the SAC fund. A minim~ SAC fund balance of twice the annual SAC requirement was determined to be necessary to proeide time for the Commission to react to annual changes in SAC revenue and requirements. Another important Consideration in establishing this minimum fund balance' is the statutory requirement of assuring holders of Council bonds =ha= suffi¢ien money available for deb= iervice. The Commission must pay the debt service costs on sewer bonds to the Council 15 months prior to the year for which payment is due. A two-year balance would insure that adequate SAC funds, are available. The study analyzes the factors which will affect future SAC : revendes and requirements and projects the growth of these factors annually for a 25-year period to 2010. These include future households,.SAC units, wastewater flows and reserve capacity. The 25-year period was selected to provide a long- range perspective of potential SAC revenues and requirements for the purpose of analyzing the effect on SAC rate increases. The ,ear period extends beyond the life of current sewer bon~s and includes a period after 2005 when several existing treatment plants may require expansion. Council forecasts indicate that the number of households in the sewer service area will grow at a much slower rate in the next 25 years -- 6,300 per year compared to 13,300 per year between 1970 and 1985. As a result, future SAC units are projected to decline from 20,000 in 1986 to less than 10,000 in 1995, to a low of 2,700 units in 2003 and 2004. If the future trends in SAC units follow this projection, the effect on future SAC revenues and rates will be significant. The study generally indicates that reserve capacity in the system will decline due to annual increases in wastewa~er flows plant several plants may be expanded. Interceptor expanded during the planning period, and the total reserve during the 25-year period. This will gradually shift a higher percentage of debt .service costs to current users. Treatment reserve capacity will not increase until after 2005 when capacity is not percentage of capacity will decline as flow increases. Estimates of future SAC requirements (that portion of debt service costs allocated to reserve capacity) are based on projected capital improvements through the year.2010 and the annual debt service payments. Capital. improvements are based on existing plans and studies and a preliminary assessment of longer range needs. The projected cost of'the 25-year capital improvements program is $1.4 billion, or $57.3 million per year assuming an annual inflation rate of 4 per cent. Capital costs vary from $61.2 million annually in the first five years to $93.7 million annually in the last five. Projected annual debt service payments are based on existing debt schedules and new bonds issued at 7.55 per cent interest until 1990 an~ increasing thereafter uniformly to 9.55 per cent in 2010. The corresponding total debt service would be $1.7 billion, or $69.1 million per year. If current value credit is included, an additional $4.2 million annually to the total debt service through 2000. will be added Current value Commission facilities credit is the original equity acquired by the in existing treatment works, interceptors and other at the time the Metropolitan Disposal System was established. projections indicate that SAC units will .'' slower Long-range, 25-year decline significantly over the p~rio~ ~ue to the projecte~ e=ropolitan growth rates. The decreased revenues will be .inadequate to meet projected SAC requirements, or SAC rates will have =o be increased signi£1cantly -- in ~ome'in~tanee~ more than $5,000 -- to meet future debt service costs for reserve capacity. The analysis suggests that relying on SAC as the only method~for paying these costs in the future may need to be reviewe4. Periodic review of SAC revenues and requirements would indicate whether the actual trends are following the projections and the future viability of the SAC system. Projection of factors such as households and capital improvements 'which are the basis for projections of future SAC requirements and revenues are difficult to ~roject accurately over a 25-year period. Future trends could vary significantly from the forecasts. Because of this concern, the'study focuses on a shorter 10-year planning p~riod. Ten-year forecasts'of SAC revenues and requirements should be more reliable and provide a long-term period for evaluating the effect of the forecasts on future SAC rates. The required SAC rate was determined for three alternatives. Reasonable and uniform annual SAC rate increases of $0-, $25, $50 and $75 -- the latter for Alternative No. 3 only -- were evaluated. Uniform annual increases would avoid sharp increases in the latter portion of the l'0-year period and following years. The results indicate an annual increase in the rate was necessary for all the alternatives in order to avoid .significant rate increases during the per'iod, pay the projected reserve cap~city debt services costs and.maznta'-n a minimum two-year fund balance. 1. Alternative No. 1 -- Existing Six Sewer Service Areas without Current Value Credit included as part of debt service -- This alternative shows (see Table VIII-2) that it would be necessary to increase the SAC rate by $25 each year during the 1987-92 period and $50 for the period of-1992 through 1996 to maintain the minimum two-year fund balance and avoid significant rate increases during and immediately following the 10-year period. 2. Alternative No. 2 -- One Sewer Service ~Area without Current Value Credit included as part of debt service -- This alternative'is offered as an option to Alternative No. 1 and the SAC rate increase would be the same as in Alternative No. 1. 3. Alternative No. 3 -- One Sewer Service Area with Current Value Credit included as part of debt service .-- This alternative is consistent with the recommendations of the Rate Structure' Task Force and is included in proposed amen~nents to Minn. Stat., Sec. 473.517. Including current value credit will increase the reserve capacity debt service cost by approximately $1.8 million in the first year. Under this alternative (as shown in Table VIII-3), it would be necessary to increase the SAC rate by $25 in 1987 (the legislation would not affect. 1987), $50 each year for 1988 through 1990, and $75 each yea for the. period 1991 through 1996. These increases were necessary' to maintain the minimum fund balance and avoid sharp £ncreazes in the rate during ~he 10-year perioa an~ =he following years. An analysis of the potential impact of the estimat'ed $5 million rebate program inaicates that the SAC rate will have to be increased $25 in addition to the increases aiscusse~ above in order to maintain the two-year minimum balance throughout the 10-year study period. CONCLU$ION~ The collection of SAC should be only for building or connection permits for which immediate connection to a municipal sewer system is possible. This position is consistent with the Rate Structure Task Force recommendations. Issues and problems relating to a rebate program should be examined and resolved before a rebate program can be established· These include the legal issues affecting the establishment of the program; the availability of records, especially prior to 1979, to verify pre~ious SAC. payments; the geographic area in which rebates should be granted; the SAC rate and interest to be paid; and the costs, including administration, to' implement the program. A minimum SAC fund balance of'twice the annual debt service costs allocated to .reserve capacity'is necessary to insure that adequate funds are available regardless of ann~al variations in SAC revenues and requiremgnt. Uniform and reasonable annual increases in the SAC rate will avoid the impact and necessity of sharp increases in future years· The recommended schedule of annual SAC rate increases shou14 be based on projections of revenues and debt requirements for the next 10 years. The 10-year period provides a long range basis for establishing future SAC rate increases and allows consideration of the implications of projected the following 10 to 15 years. changes, in The SAC rate should be increased annually for the nex~ 10 years under the current six service areas or proposed one service area ¢os~ allocation syst~s: Until current value credit is included with debt service costs, annual rate increases of $25 beginning in 1~87 and $50 in 1992 is needed to maintain the minimum balance and avoid sharp rate' increases later. If~current value credit is included in 1988 an annual rate increase of $50 beginning in 1988 and $75 in 1991 is necessary to maintain the minimum balance ind avoid sharp rate increases in later years· A biennial review of SAC requirements and revenues woul~ allow an evaluation of the effect of new information and projections on future SAC rates. Projections for the next 25 years indicate that the number of SAC units could decrease significantly after the mid-1990's. Rates will. have to be increased significantly or other revenue sources will have to be used to pay for the cost of reserve capacity debt service· RECOMMENDATIONS That the SAC collected at the time a building permit is issued for a building that will be initially connected to a municipal sewer system or when a connection permit is issued for any building for Which SAC was not Previously paid. That the commission not establish a pro, ram of rebate for SAC pending a more thorough study of financial costs, l~gal constraints to establishing the program, the administrative obstacles and costs, the geographic area for granting rebates, and the SAC rate and interest to be paid. That uniform and reasonable increases in future SAC rates be established which maintain a SAC fund balance of at least twice the annual SAC requirement. a) That t~e SAC rate be increased in accordance with the following schedule, until such time as the current value credit is made a part of the. debt service in cost allocation· This schedule would apply to Alternative No. 1 and 2. 1986 .'1.987 1988 $475 (present) 1989 $550 1992 $650 $500 I990 $575 1993 $700 $525 1991 $600 1994 $750 1995 $800 1996 $850 b) That the'SAC rate-be increased in accordance with the following schedule at such time as the cost allocation is changed to debt service. No. 3. '1986 $475 (present) 1987 $500 1988 $550 include current ~alue credit as part of This schedule would apply to Alternative 1989 $600 1990 $650 1991 $725 1992 $800 1993 $875 1994 $950 1995 $.1025 1996 $1100 That the projection of to respond to changes revenues· SAC rates be reviewed biennially in the SAC requirement~ and