The URL can be used to link to this page

86-10-14 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAX, OCTOBER 14, 1986 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1 Approve Minutes - September 30, 1986, Special Budget · Hearing _ September 30, 1986, Regular Meeting _ October 1, 1986, Special Budget Hearing 2. Set Public Hearing for Vacation of Certain Street Easement Lying Between Lots 43 and 44 in Koehler's Addition SUGGESTED DATE: November 12, 1986 3 CASE #86-541 & 542: Final Plat Approval, Shadywood · Point 2nd Addition 4. Application for Operations Permit - Balboa Corporation 5. Reconsideration of Variance for H. E. Wolner, 2660 Lakewood Lane - P & Z Case #86-536 6 ~ASE #86-546: Berry Rettke, 1742 Resthaven, Lot 23, · Block 5, Shadywood Point, PID #13-117- 24 11 0033 REQUEST: Variance Recognizing Existing Nonconforming Lot Size and Setbacks 7 ~ASE #86-5~?: Henry & June Radintz, 4894 Edgewater, · Lot 10, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood PID #13-117-24 41 0008 REQUEST: Front Yard Setback Variance 8. QASE #86-~4q: Charles Weed, Lot 1, Block 8, Woodcrest, REQUEST: Relocation of Structure at 4519 Shoreline Drive, Spring Park to 2835 Halstead Lane 9. Appointment to Planning Commission (Recommendation from Planning Commission: Vern Anderson) 10. Set Bid Opening Date for Skidsteer Loader SUGGESTED DATE: November'7, 1986, 10:00 A.M. 11. Set Bid Opening Date for 1, 3/4 Ton, 2 Wheel Drive Pick-Up and 2, 3/4 Ton, 4 Wheel Drive Pick-Ups SUGGESTED DATE: November 7, 1986, 10:00 A.M. pg. 2099 pg. 21-00-2109 pg. 2110-2112 pg. 2113-2119 pg. 2120-2134 pg. 2135-2143 pg. 2144-21 47 pg. 21 48-2158 pg. 2159-2167 pg. 2168-2173 pg. 2174-2175 pg. 2176-2181 pg. 21 82-21 91 Page 2097 12. Hennepin County Road 15 Improvement Project - Width of Street 13. Appointment to Park Commission (Recommendation from the Park Commission - Shirley M. Anderson) Jim Regan) Recommended 14. Appointment to HRA (Recommendation from HRA: 15. Resolution Appointing the Election Judges as Pg. 21 92-2194 pg. 21 95-21 96 pg. 2197 for the November 4, 1986, General Election 16. DISCUSSION: 75th Anniversary of the City of Mound 17. Resolution Requesting Conveyance of Certain Easements on Tax Forfeit Property (Lot 6, Block 34, Wychwood) pg. 2198-2201 18. Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present pg. 2202-2202t 19. Payment of Bills ® 20. _iNFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. September 1986 Department Head Monthly Reports pg. 2203-2231 B State Auditor's Report on Municipal Liquor Stores for 1985 and the City of Mound's 1985 Breakdown · pg. 2232-2238 for the Municipal Liquor Store C. REMINDER: Hennepin County Public Hearing on Wednesday, October 15, 1986, 10:00 A.M. Government Center, Minneapolis- RE: Proposed Solid Waste Source Separation Ordinance. Joyce Nelson will be attending· If you are interested, please advise, pg. 2239-2249 D. REMINDER: Informational Meeting on Public Works Facility Sponsored by the League of Women Voters, Saturday, October 11, 1986, 9:15 A.M., School Board Meeting Room. Bob Russek, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc., Greg Skinner and Myself Will be Presenting the Proposed Project. E~ p~esentation to Officer McKinley and Rex tonight, pg. 2250 Page 2098 144 September 30, 1986 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - SPECIAL BUDGET HEARING SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session to go over the proposed 1987 Budget on Tuesday, September 30, 1986, at 5:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen, Russ Peterson and Steve Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Finance Director John Norman, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Fire Chief Don Bryce, Acting Police Chief Bill Hudson, Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm, Street Superintendent Geno Hoff, Sewer & Water Superintendent Gregg Skinner, Park Director Jim Fackler. The Council went over the following proposed Budgets and asked various questions of the Department Heads: Planning & Inspections Parks Commons Docks Cemetery Fire Police Streets Water Sewer Liquor The Council continued this meeting to October 1, 1986, at 6:00 P.M. 145 September 30, 1986 NINUTES- MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR NEETING SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, September 30, 1986, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341Maywood Road, in said City. This meeting followed the Budget Hearing. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polson, Councilmembers Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen, Russ Peterson and Steve Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Jim Larson, City Engineer John Cameron, City Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jan Bertrand and the following interested citizens: William Christian, Patricia Kargel, Dagmar Christian, Jerry Kargel, Ray Johnson, Orr Fenstad, Rick Sathre, Dan Martin, Phyllis Marton, Tom Ess, Judy Ess, Cheryl Grand, Bill Netka, Jerry Longpre, John Royer, Julie Schwinghammer, Brian Johnson, LeRoy & Rosemary Luedke. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Minutes from the September 10, 1986, Special Meeting were presented for consideration. NOTION made by Smith, seconded by Peterson to approve the Minutes of the September 10, 1986, Special Meeting, as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The Minutes of the September 16, 1986, Regular Meeting were presented for consideration. NOTION made by Peterson, seconded by Smith to approve the Minutes of the September 16, 1986, Regular Meeting, as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINOUENT UTILITY BILLS The City Manager reported that the amount is down to $q,876.60. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished, to address the Council regarding a delinquent utility bill. No one responded. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION #86-115 RESOLUTXON TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $q,876.60 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUTOFF MATER SERVICE FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote wa~-unan~mou~ly £n favor. Mo~on earr~ed. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION OF LAND (PRELIM- INARY PLAT & LOT VARTANCE) AT q6X~ LAKESIDE LANE PID #18-11T-2~ ~2 001~/0016 The City Planner explained the proposed subdivision and the lot width variances. The two newly created lots would have 13,600 square feet in Lot I and 31,800 square feet in Lot 2J He further stated that this variance request does meet the criteria for granting a variance. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the stipulations of the staff. The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council on the requested subdivision. Bill Christianson - owner of the Lot 7, Block 9 asked about grading and drainage plans. Rick Sathre, representing Mr. Ess stated that they will work with them on this plan. The City Engineer stated that this a grading and drainage plan is one of the stipulations. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Polston moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-116 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND LOT VARIANCE FOR LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, SHADYWOOD POINT SECOND ADDITION FOR TOM ESS The Council asked that the City Engineer's recommendations t's 3 thru 6 on page 1973 be included in the resolution. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. pUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION FOR LOT 2. BLOCK l~t DEVON? PID #25-117-24 11 0047 The City Engineer explained that there is no reason why the northerly 10 feet of this easement could not be vacated. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Jessen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: lZ17 September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION #86-117 RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF A UTILITY EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS LOT 2, BLOCK 15, DEVON, PID #25-117-2q 11 OOq?, P & Z CASE NO. 86-5/t3 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried~ PUBLIC HEARINGS~ ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS'AS FOLLOWS~ Am CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT - LEV~ #10281 Jerry Longpre of the CBD Parking Committee gave history of this assessment. tl~e The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak regarding their assessment, Orr Fenstad asked if the parking lot across from the Post Office, which is being used primarily for bus users, is being charged to the CBD. He suggested that that part of the lot not be,charged to the businesses. The City Manager explained that the total amount of the assessment has changed because a re-evaluation of the assessment for the old Super Valu was done to be more fair to the current owner. The Mayor closed the public hearing. '-' Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-118 RESOLUTION ADOPTING CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,6~2.~ TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST - LEVY #10281 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. B. UNPAID TREE REMOVAL ASSESSMENT - LEVY #10278 The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address ghe Council regarding their proposed assessment. No one responded. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION /:86-119 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID TREE REMOVAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE lZ~8 De september 30, 1986 AMOUNT OF $825.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST - LE~Y #10278 The vote was unanimously in favor, Motion carried, UNPAID CLEAN-UP ASSESSMENT - LEVY #10279 The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council regarding their proposed assessment, No one responded, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-120 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID CLEAN-UP CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $80.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~[ INTEREST - LEVY ~10279 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried, DELINOUENT UTILITY BILLS ASSESSMENT - LEVY #10280 The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council regarding their proposed assessment, No one responded, The Mayor closed the public hearing. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-121 RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT WATER & SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,932.1~ TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST - LEVY #10280 The vote was unanimously in favor, Motion carried. UNPAID CAPPING OF SE~ER LINE ASSESSMENT - LEVY #10282 The. Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council regarding their proposed assessment, No one responded, The Mayor closed the public hearing, Paulsen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: 149 September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION ~86-122 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID CAPPING OF SEWER LINE ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $393.75 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 85 INTEREST - LEVY #10282 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SANITARY SE~ER & WATER EXTENSION ASSESSMENT LEVY #10283 The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council regarding their proposed assessment. No one responded. The Mayor .closed the public hearing. Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-123 RESOLUTION ADOPTING SANITARY SEWER WATER EXTENSION ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,351.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST - LEVY ~10283 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. G. BOARDING UP HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT - LEVY ~10286 The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council regarding their proposed assessment. No one responded. The Mayor blosed the public hearing. Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution:. ' RESOLUTION ~86-124 RESOLUTION ADOPTING BOARDING UP HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLE IN THE AMOUNT OF $180.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST - LEVY ~10286 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. H. WEED & GRASS CUTTING CHARGES ASSESSMENT. - LEVY #10287 The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to address the Council regarding their proposed assessment. No one responded. The Mayor closed the public hearing. 150 September 30, 1986 Paulsen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #85-125 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID WEED & GRASS CUTTING CHARGES ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $125.28 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST - LEVY #10287 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTIONS LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEMENTAL AssESSMENTS Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-126 RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSHENT UPON WAIVER OF FORMALITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; AND DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR - LEVY ~10284 - $1,170.90 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-127 RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT UPON WAIVER OF FORMALITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR - LEVY ~ 10497 - $6,160.00 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-128 RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS UPON WAIVER OF FORMALITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR - LEVY #10285 - $1,786 .q5 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~86-g~tq: LFROY LUEDKE~ ~2ql TONKAWOOD ROAD? PID #1~-117-2q ~2 0001. FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE The Building Official explained the request. Commission has recommended approval. The Planning Peterson moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: 151 September 30, 1986 RESOLUTION #86-129 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A SETBACK VARIANCE FOR NORTHWESTERLY 100 FEET OF BLOCK 1 AND ALL LAND BETWEEN EXTENSIONS INTO LAKE NINNETON~A OF THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST EXCEPTING THE SOUTHWESTERLY 75 FEET OF BLOCK 1, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, PID #13-117-24 32 0001 (5241 TON~aWOOD ROAD) P & Z CASE #86-544 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #86-545: BBAnLEY & JANICE BRISTOL. 155q BLUEBIRD LANE. LOTS 8 & lq. BLOCK 6. WOODLAND POINT~ PID #1~-117 ~24 42 0040/0050. VARIANCE - £~ISTING NONCON- FORMING STRUCTURE & DEC~ The City Planner explained the variance reques~. Commission has recommended approval. The Planning Polston moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-130 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACK FOR LOTS 8 & 9, BLOCK 6, WOODLAND POINT, PID ~12-1~7-24 43 0040/0050 (1550 BLUEBIRD LANE) P & Z CASE ~86-545 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. FINAL PAYMENT REOUEST:. BARTLETT BLVD. PROJECT- BUFFALO BITUM- INOUS - ~2:824.59 MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Smith to approve the final payment request of Buffalo Bituminous for the Bartlett Blvd. Project in the amount of $2,824.59. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. EXTENSION OF COMPLETION DATE ON LYNWOOD BLVD. PROJECT MOTION made by Paulsen, seconded by Smith to approve the extension for the completion of the Lynwood Blvd. Project to October 15, 1985. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RESCHEDULE COUNCIL MEETINGS IN NOVEMBER MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Polston to reschedule the City Council Meetings in November to Wednesday, November 1986, and Tuesday, November 25, 1986, due to legal holiday on November ~1, ~986. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. , 152 September 30, 1986 APPROYE SPECIFICATIONS & SET BID OPENING DATE FOR FIRE/RESCUE MOTION made by Peterson, seconded by Smith to approve the specifications and set a bid opening date of Thursday, October 30, 1986, ag 10:00 A.M. for the fire/rescue vehicle. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager stated that item ~12 has been withdrawn from this Agenda. REOUEST FOR STREET LIGHT - CANARY LANE The City Manager presented the Council with a petition for a street light for the 1500 block of Canary Lane. The Police Dept. has reviewed the area and recommends the installation of the light. Polston moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #86-131 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INSTALLATION OF A STREET LIGHT IN THE 1500 BLOCX OF CANARY LANE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT The Mayor asked if there were any comments or suggestions from the citizens present. There were none. LICENSE RENEWAL & NEW LICENSE APPLICATION MOTION made by Paulsen, seconded by Smith to authorize the issuance of the following licenses: Set-Up License for Mound Lanes, Pool Table for Donnies on the Lake. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS The bills were presented for consideration. MOTION made by Paulsen, seconded by Jessen to approve the payment of bills, as presented on the pre-list, in .the amount of $260,637.39, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS ne Recycling Flier. Planning Commission Minutes - September 8, 1986. September 30, 1986 August 1986 Monthly Financial Report as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. De Eo Notice on the League of Minnesota Cities Annual Policy Adop- tion Meeting to be held November 20, 1986, in St. Paul. Study of Rate Structure for Service Availability Charge (SAC) Years 1986 - 2010 from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Reminder of Special Council Meeting~ on the Proposed 1987 Budget. Ge Reminder of meeting with Maxfield Research Group regarding the Lost Lake Market Analysis. Reminder of Breakfast with the Chairperson of the Metro Council. NOTION made by Paulsen, seconded by Peterson to.adjourn at 8:35 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk BILLS .......... SEPiEMBER 30, 1986 Computer Run :dated 9/18/86---Batch 86q091 126,935.37 Computer Run dated 9/2q/86---Batch 864092 99,562.87 Computer Run dated 9/25/86---Batch 864093 30,600.q6 257,098.70 Buffalo Bituminous--Final--Bartlett Blvd Bottle Basket ....... Supplies for Reserve Dance Jaunich Enterprises- II II II II Pepsi/TUp Bottling-- Lake Upholstery ..... Reupholster chairs-police Adventure Publications--Tree Handbook--Parks 2,814.59 27q.30 90.00 lil.30 179.00 69.50 Total Bills 260,637.39 October 1, 1986 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - CONTINUATION OF BUDGET HEARING OCTOBER 1, 1986 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session to continue the hearing on the Proposed 1987 Budget on October 1, 1986, at 6:20 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Phylli.s Jessen, Gary Paulsen, Russ Peterson and Steve Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Finance Director John Norman, Fire Chief Don Bryce, Acting Police Chief Bill Hudson, Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm, Street Superintendent Geno Hoff, Sewer & Water Superintendent Greg Skinner and Park Director Jim Fackler. The Council went over the following proposed Budgets: Finance City Manager/Clerk City Council Legal Building Fund Capital Outlay The majority of the Council decided to take $4,000'.00 from line item #4411 in the City Council Budget and put it in the Contingency Account. The City Manager went over the General Fund Revenues, Expenditures, the Assessed Valuation, Levies and the Mill Rate with the Council. The HRA has requested that the City levy one-third of a mill for their operations at 2020 Commerce Blvd. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-132 RESOLUTION APPROVING A ONE-THIRD MILL LEVY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PURSUANCE TO THE PROVISIONS OF M.S.A. 462.411 THRU 462.?05, OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE YEAR 1987 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Smith moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: 155 RESOLUTION ~86-1~ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1987 GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,073,?20 AND SETTING THE LEVY AT $1,262,351 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: · RESOLUTION ~86-13~ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR 1987 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #86-135 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1976 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,1~2.39 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Smith moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #86-136 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1979 IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,763.00 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Peterson moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-137 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY OF THE GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1980 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,387.00 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Smith moved and Jess~n seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-138 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY $12,386.9~ FOR FIRE EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS OF 198~ The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Paulsen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-139 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1978 IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,123.00 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 156 October 1, 1986 Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~86-140 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY $21,423.94 FOR 1976 WATER REVENUE BONDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #86-141 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATIONS INPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1982 IN THE ANOUNT OF $17,300.00 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. HOTION made by Paulsen, seconded by Jessen to adjourn at 8:15 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnesota CASE NO. 86-$48 NOTICE oFPuBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF CERTAIN STREET EASEHENT LYING BETWEEN LOTS. q3 AND. ~q IN KOEHLER'S AODITION TO HOUND' TO.WHOH'IT RAY cONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a meeting wi11 be held at the City Hall, 53ql Haywood Road, Hound, Hinneso.(a, at 7:30 P.~, on Wednesday, NoVember 12, 1~86~ to conslder-.the vacation of a certain street'an8 util).ty, easement over the followlng described land: That pa.~t Of"'the.'alley as dedicated.In Ko~hler's Addition to Hound accord'ing to the:recorded piat'there0f,.Hennepin C~unty, Hlnnesota, )y'ing.northerly of.the.easterly' extension.of the northerly line of Lot.q5, sald.Koehler's'Addition..to.Hound and southerly, of'the fol- lowSng descri, b~d. lihe: .-Con~nen¢~ng'at the. northeast corner .o-f Lo~.ql', said Koehler's Addition to.Hound; thencA, on a.'bearing'of Southi'along'a east line of. said Lot ql'a'd.|stance of 10,00 feet 'to :he. beginning 'of said llne:, thence. South['8~.'degrees.28'mi~utes ~5 seconds West 5.08 feet; thense south- wes~er'l'y 287.22 feet"along, a tangential'curvej, concave to the.southeast havipg a radJbs.of 1056.:q8 feet and.~a central'angle of 15 degrees 3q min'utes'3$ seconds and-sai'd 1.ine there teF~inating. :Cpntaini~g 370, i square:feet. (150 feet' East of intersection of Lynwood and Commerce Boulevards) Such persons as desire to be heard with referen:e to the above will be heard at this meeting. Francene C., Clark, City Clerk COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ILAND SURVEYORS I PLANNERS Septembe= 19, 1986 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 0an Bert=and Planning and Zoning City of, Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBJECT: AIley Vacation "Koehler's Addition to Mound" MKA Fiie #2113 Dear ~an: We have reviewed the request for vacating the small portion of alley south of new Lynwood Boulevard iying between Lots 43 and 44 in "Koehier's Addition to Mound". Because this area is now in the pa=king iot of newly =emodeied retaii cente= and there a=e no city utiiittes Iocated within it, we See no reason for the City to retain owne=shtp. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact us. Very t~uly you=s, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Came=on JC:cah APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF MOUND APPLICANT ~ITY QF MOUND ,SS 5341Maywood Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: LOT STREET TO BE VACATEO PID # BLOCK SUBD I V I S I ON (SEE ATTACHED MAP) DATE 'FILED 9-16-86 (SEE ATTACHEO DESCRIPTION) REASON FOR REQUEST Finish up the Lynwood Blvd. Project and get this piece back' back on the tax rolls. Recommended by the City Engineer. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ADDRESS 5341 Maywood Road ~ound. MN. 55364 TEL. NO. 472-1155 Applicant's Interest in Property Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated: (Please attach list. Certified mailing list can be obtained from · Hennepin County by calliqg 348-3271) Continental Telephone Recommended by Utilities: NSP .; 'Minnegasco ..;' Recommended by City: Public Works ; Fire Chief ; Engineer ; Pollce Chief ; Cable Systems ; Other Departments Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action Date Resolution NO. ~ ~COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES NC. !:'?':)~)~)~)~)~.~li:~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS . LAND SURVEYORS i PLANNERS, I Description to Vacate Part of Alley In KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND ,: Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Bouleverd Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 That part of the alley as dedicated in KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND according tq the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the easterly extension of the northerly line of Lot 45, said KOEHLER-'S ADDITION TO MOUND and southerly of the followin9 described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 4i, said KOEHLER'$ ADDITION TO MOUND; thence on a bearing of South along a east line of said Lot 4I a distance of lO.O0 feet to the beginning of said line: thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds West 5.08 feet; thence southwesterly 287.22 feet aiong a tangentiai ctmve, concave to the southeast having a radius of I056.48 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 34 ~inutes 35 seConds and said Iine there terminating. Containing 370.91 square feet. UARE SITE.' ~ ! '~ I s.. '588 I ' I. k ...,. _ .,,_i', ..... - -'__.._L.--~ ,-----F_ .... _L_! ~ ~ ~ --~i~..~.~, ~ ~ ,,-.. ~ ' _ _ T~_i4~6~_ ~ ~: ',SUPER VALU ..... R!~5+04.1.5 i II ! ,..~ '.."~ · ~ ... ¥~ .... ! ~.., I .'".. ~ N ~ ,::r ~,~. ~..... BURLINGTON ~//2 .4¸ PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 86-548 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN STREET EASEMENT LYING BETWEEN LOTS 43 AND 44 IN KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND, P & Z Case No. 86-548 WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City Council may be resolution vacate anystreet, alley, public grounds, or public way or any part thereof, when it appears in the interest of the public to do so; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has claimed a street and utility easement over the following described land: That part of the alley as dedicated in Koehler's Addition to Mound according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the easterly extension of the northerly line of Lot 45, said Koehler's Addition to Mound and southerly of the fol- lowing described line: COmmencing at the northeast corner of Lot 41, said Koehler's Addition to Mound; thence on a bearing of South along'a east line of said Lot 41'a distance of 10.00 feet to the beginning of said line: thence South 89degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds West 5.08 feet; thense south- westerly 287.22 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast having a radius of 1056.48 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds and said llne there terminating. Containing 370.91 square feet. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 12, 1986, as required by law; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires that these easements be vacated and that it would be in the public interest to do so. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby vacates: That part of the alley as dedicated in'KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the easterly extension of the northerly line of Lot 45, said KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND and southerly of the fol- lowing described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 41, said KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND; thence on a bearing of South along a east line of said Lot 41 a distance of I0.00 feet to the beginning of said line: thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds West 5.08 feet; thence southwesterly 287.22 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast having a radius of 1056.48 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds and said line there terminating. A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared by the City Clerk and shall be a notice of completion of the proceedings and shall be re- corded in the Office of the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles~j/~ as set forth in M.S.A. 412.851. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS October 8, 1986 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Ns. 3an Bertrand Planning & Zoning City of Hound 5~41 Haywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBJECT: Final Plat Approval Shadywood Point 2nd Addition MKA File #8055 Dear Oan: We have reviewed the final plat and' constzuction plans submitted for Shadywood Point 2nd Addition and have the following comments and recommendations. FINAL PLAT The proposed lot line between Lot 1 and 2 is not consistent with the preitmfnary pIat approvaI granted as Lot 1 does not front on a pubiic street. e The utility easement necessary for the sewer and water services is not included on the pIat. FINAL GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN No fill is shown at the rear of the proposed house on Lot 2, even though the walkout elevation is approximately 2 feet above the existing ground. If this area is to be filied, then compensating excavation will probabIy be require by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District since the. existing grade is at or below 931.5. If this is not revised for approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District at this time, it will need to be done before a building permit can be issued. A separate permit from the City is required before the street can be excavated to instai1 the new sewer and water services. Ms. 3an Bertrand October 8, 1~86 Page Two We recommend conditions: US. approval of the final plat subject to the following If you have any questions or need additional The lot line between Lots 1 and 2 needs to be revised to be consistent with the approved preliminary plat.* Addition of the necessary utility and drainage easements.* Approval of all final grading and utility plans by the City Engineer. Approval submitted to the City from all agencies requiring review, such as the Ninnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)., Minnesota Health Department (M~D), Department of Natural Resources (D~R), etCo information, please contact Sincerely, McCOMBS-KI~T$ON ASSOCIATES, INC. Oohn Cameron OC:cah The final plat is in the process of being revised so the copy included in the council packet will be correct. WA'i'E;RS ;D DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. · Nber~ L Lehman · John E. Thomas · Barbara R. Gudmundson · Michael R. Carroll September 26, 1986 LAKE #INNETOItK~ Honorable Mayor Pols~on and City Council City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Tom Ess, 45XX Lakeside Road, MCWD Permit Application No. 86-163 Honorable Mayor Polspon: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's Board of Managers reviewed the plans on September 18, lg86 from Mr. Ess for the proposed fill for placement of the building pad, compensatory excavation for the building pad fill, rip-rap, filling in of the man-made lagoon behind the rip-rap, and dredging. The permit was tabled pending: 1) review and approval by the DNR for the dredging, 2) review of the plans and calculations balancing cut and fill for the building pad, and 3) review of past MCWD Permits which allowed filling of man-made boat slips. The applicant has submitted exhibits showing a first floor elevation of 2feet above the projected regional flood elevation and calculations which demonstrate a balance of cut and fill for the proposed building pad. While these exhibits meet District standards for residential development on the lake, the Board of Managers expressed their concern about the low elevation of the backyard and that the present and future owners be made awar~..that this portion of the property may be subject to periods of shallow flooding. At the request of the owner's representative, Clifford Reep, we direct this letter to you in the hopes of eliminating unnecessary delay for the applicant in the City's review of the subdivision request. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 473-4224. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District Julie Johnson Engineer kh (~...(~ t CC: Board G. Macomber C. Reep T. Ess APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND LAND FEE OWNER PLAT Tom Ess SHADYWOOD POINT " 218 Walnut Street Chaska, HN 55318' FEE $ PARCEL Lots 1-6 Block 10 S. ~ Vacated Ivy Lane N. ~ Vacated Ivy Lane Locationandcompletelegal ~scriptim ofproper~ tobedivided: . Lots 1 thru 6, Block 10, SHADYW00D POINT, accoraing and the southwesterly half of vacated Ivy Lane adjoining said Ivy Lane The northeasterly half of vacatedAadjoining Lot 3, Block 9 of ALSO The southwesterly half of vacated Ivy Lane adjoining said SHADYW00D POINT. ZONING to the recorded plat thereof, Lots 1 thru 6. ALSO said SHADY~OOD POINT. Lot 7, Block 10, of R .- 1 To be divided as follows: 2 Parcels as shown on attached drawing SHADY~00D POINT 2ND ADDI~ION All supporting documents, 'such as sketch plans, surveys, attachments, etc. must be submitted 'In':8½' 'X 11~ size-'and/or lq copies· plus' one 8½."'X 11'~' copy'. {attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. .' * F~om Square feet TO Square feet Reasdn: APPLIC:ANT ~ / / ~.~, I/~ TC~IE Lt ~0~.. /'"~¢ f" 2 / ADDRESS 218 Walnut Stre. et DATE 8/20/86 Chaska, HN 55318 Applicant's interest in the property: Owner This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- 'ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: O~/~3 Planning Commission Minutes September 8, 1~86 cases .N0~ ~6'-~;/~1 & 86-5~2. Publlc Hearing on Subdivision of Land and Varlance for'Zl6XX Lakeside Lane; Lots 1 to. &, lncluslve, Including vacated Ivy Lane, Block I0; and. Lot 3, B.lbck 9, allIn Shady~ood Point- Tom and dudy Ess, Richard Sathre of Sathre-Bergqulst, in'c. and Dan Martin were preseht. VarkKop..gler, C. Ity' Planner, reviewed his report Stating proposal Is to divide Lots I and 6, Block 10',. Shady~ood Point and all of vacated Ivy Lane into two bulldlng sites. Lots meet all the Zoning .Code requirements except the .60 foot minimum lot wldth at'the bulldlng line. Transfer of Lot 3 without the eastern poftlon of vacated Iv~ Lane causes that parc. el to need a lot width · ~arlance also. ~/lthout the vacated eastern half of Ivy Lane, the access to proposed Lots I and 2 ~ould' only be 11-12 feet wide. He Is reco~endibg approval 'of the' prel.'lml~ary plat and lot width variances with certaln condi- tions. Jan Bertran. d, Building Official, reviewed the Englneerts report which comments on Grading & Drainage Plan (a low area near proposed driveway should be fllled: and this would need permission from the Owner of Lot 7); Preliminary Plan and Utillty Plan and the deficient unit charges and his reco~nendatlons.. The Bulldlng Offlclal clarified that this publlc hearing was for both prellmlnary and final plat approval so applicant ~ould not have to go through twlce. The Chair opened the public hearlng and the following persons had comments: NANCY SCHROEDER, o~er of Lot 2, Block 9, Shady~ood Point, stated she wanted It known that there Is no access to benefit Lot 3 across her lot; she is cur- .. rently marketing the lot and sees no way for an easement to be allowed. RICH SATHRE of $athre Bergqulst stated bls. C~mpany Is helplng ~:ss plat the prop- erty. He had drawing 'of lots.and stated there Is 11 feet from house on Lot 3 to lot 11ne of Lot 2.; one could get around to. a garage site on lakeslde~ but house is not set back far enough to bul'Id a garage on the street' slde. Vhat they are trying to' do Is create a 'sh~red area of t~o lots fo'r entrance; Esst would have a strip, of land one way.and the Martln~s, who propose to buy.and bulld on Lot I, would ovn~ the o~her 11tile piece of the. vacated Ivy Lane. The Esst sold Lot 3 without Including the 10 foot strip of Ivy. Lane. ti)at ~as'vacated. The Commission questioned that the County' has not notlfied City of transfer and the status of that ten. feet and that that dlvlslon makes Lot 3 nonconforming.. .The Commission discussed the. proposal at length.. I.t was noted that Ess~ acquired a corner of Lot 7 to .get.the full 20 feet of .vacated Ivy. Lane. FRED ASHER questioned the number of lo.ts that ~o~1..d be ~esul't of this division. There were no other conm~nts or questions, the Chair cl'osed the pub'llc hearlng. Thal moved and Mayer seconded a .motlo~ .thal~ the Commission recommend appro" ~ with the stlpulatlons by .the staff. The vote was unanimously In favor. V,._,on carried. A public hearing has been set by the. City Council for September 30, 1~86. SE? - ~ ~.~.~ ,; CITY OF MOUND ~ ': , =T' ~ .... ..,,~? '~';. APPLICATION TO PLANNING S ZONING COHHISSlON Fee' Pa; d Bate ~lled Case No. 74 -~-~,L Street Address of Property LAKESIDE ROAD Legal Oescrlpti.on of Property: Lots 1-6 & Vacated Ivy Lane Addition ' SUADY~O~D POINT ADDITION PID'No. Owner's Name Tom Ess 218 ~alnut Street~ Chaska, Minnesota 55318 Address , ~/ _Blo_ck 10 ----I~ '-//z- - Day Phone No. /4q8-2125 Applicant (if other than ovmer): SAME Name Address Day Phone No. Type of Request: (X) Variance ( ) ConditiOnal Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretatlon. S Revle~ ( ) ~etland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit (X)*Other '!f other, specify: .Preliminary Plat approval ~'~='Present Zoning District R-j e Existing Use(s) of Property VACANT Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property1n°t to our knowledgCf so, llst date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany, present request. I certify that all of the above statements and t~e statements contained In any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry In or upon the premises described in t~is')appllcation by any authorized officlal of the City of Hound for the purpose of insPect~ng{ ~r of.~pos?ing, maintaining and removing such n~tices as may be requlred ~?law.~ /~ S~gnature of Applicant ~ (~CJ L _~o .. Date 8/20/86 Plannlng Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date Request for Zoning Variance Procedure (2) Case # O. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zonln~l Variance See Lette, dated 8/20/1~86 A. All information belov~, a site plan, as described In Part II, and general appllcation must be provided before a hearing w111 be scheduled. B. Ooes the present use of the property conform to all use regulatlons for the zone district In which It is located? Yes (X) ~1o ( ) If "no", specify each n'on-conformlng use: C. Do the existing structures comply with ali area height and bulk regulations for the zone dlstrlct In which I't ls located? Yes ( ) No ( ) If "no", specify each non-conforming use: O. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent Its reasonable use for any of the.uses.permitted.in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soll ( ) Too small ( ) Oralnage ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallmv ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: See I~tter Was the hardship d~scrlbed above c~eated by the action of anyone having property interests In the land after the Zoning Ordinance wa~ adopted2 Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes, explain: . See letter Was the'h~rdshlp created by anyother man-made change, such as the reloCa- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes, explain: · See letter Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X) No ( ) If no, how many other properties are-similarly affected? H. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulatlons that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) ~p~ l~tt~r and Plan I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrlmental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? ~ '. ~ ' ~ ~-, T H B E - B E K ~ E. U [ ~. ',', "~" : ' 106 SOUTH BROADWAY · WAYZATA. MN. 55391 · TELEPHONE B1 t3-476-6000 Augus~ ~0, 1986 Honorable Hayor and Ho~bers ofthe City Council City.of V=und 5H41Maywood Road Hound, Minnesota SubJect= Hr. Tom Ess Prel Imlnary Plat and Variance Request Honorable Mayor and Council 14eabers: Hr. Tom Ess Is applying for prellmlnary Plat approval to divide his property on SHADYHOOD POINT. Hr. Ess has owned the property .since 1983. The property Is presently platted as Lots I-6, Block 10, SHADYtfOOD POINT together with the 20 foot s-trip of land which' Is vacated Ivy Lane. In the existing situation, Hr. Essts ownershlp Is 'one parcel. HIs proposal Is to subdlvlde the property Into 1~o lots, each of whlch would be as large or larger Than the mJorlty of the other lots In the nelghborhoodo The prellmlnary plat shows the geometry of these ~o proposed lots and the area of each above the ordinary hlgh water mark of Lake Nlnnetonka. The maJorlty of' the 'lo~s In the neighborhood were orlglnally platted with 50 feet of lot w.ldth and frontage on the pubilc streets. The slx lots which Mr. Ess owns each were plak-fed at the sa~e standards, wlth frontage on Ivy Lane. Ivy Lane was never constructed and the city has slnce vacated the road. The action to vacate the road has created a difficult sltuatlo, for Hr. Ess. The original slx lots wlth 50 feet of street frontage 'each now have become one parcel wlth a total street frontage of 24 feet. The construction of one home on this property would not be a reasonable use of the property. The fact that the road was never opened for use has created a hardship on the land. We believe that the request to subdivide the property Into two building lots Is the minimum reasonable use of the property. Thls request for subdlvlslon creates the need for two varlances for lot ~'Idth at the streeT. ^ppi ication for a bulldlng permit on the existln9 parcel would trigger the need to obtaln a variance for lot width at the street, as well. The proposal Is to plat Lots 1 & 2, each with equal street frontage on Lakes lde Road and to create a cross easement from Lot 1 to Lot 2 and Lot 2 to Lot 1 for the shared use of that part of vacated Ivy Lane leadlng Into the Internal portion of the property, In concluslon~ the proposed subdlvlslon and assoclated variances would allow the reasonable use of the property~ and would not be detrlmental to the adJolnlng properties nor to the enforcement of the zoning ord i nance, Sincerel¥~ SATHRE_-BERGQUIST~ I Rlchard H. Sathre, P.E. Pres I dent R~S/ts \ .-...-. i'"':' CITY ,.OF.. CITY Or I "T.W'. Daniel- Re--Arrangen~ent of Lots 4.5-6- '~' .... -"-:-. - - I i I ":.~-.'"g. WHEREAS, the City Council on September 30, 1986 held a Public Hearing pursuant to Section 2200, Chapter 22, Mound COde of Ordinances, to co,raider approval of a preliminary p/at and lot area variances for the establishment of two residential lots described as Lots i and Lots 2, Block 1, ShadF~m~d Point Second Additio~: and WHEREAS, said plat is consistent with the exceptioa of lot width with. · the Mound Comprehensive plea and the z~gulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and Ordinances of the City o~ Mound, Subdivision Code %422: and WHEREASv the applicant has applied for 48 foot lot width variances for Lot I and Lot 2 and such varatnces have been reviewed by the Planning Commisssion who has recommended approval due to the unique shape of the property which meets the Zoning Ordinance criteria ~or the granting o~ varia~ces. "' Preliminary plea and Variance case numbers 86-541 and 86-542 are approved compliance with the followin~ requirements: 1. Per plat on file at Mound City Hall dated /~/Z/, 2. Posting of a subdividers escrow in the amount of $1000. 3. Setbacks of Lot 1 Shall be at least 27.5 feet to the front lot line (northwest), 10 feet on each side yard and at least 50 feet to the lakeshore. 4. Setbacks of Lot 2 shall be at least 29 feet to the front lot line (northwest), 10 feet to the side yard and at least 50 feet to the lakeshore. 5. Utility and grading plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. 6. The City Attorney shall review and approve the easement agreement for the common driveway and property title. 7. Since the project involves filling below the 931.5 elevation, grading, drainage, and erosion control plans shall be reviewed and approved by the watershed district and all other applicable agencies. 8. Park dedication fees shall be collected for Lots 1 and 2 consistent with current park charges for minor subdivisions. 9. Failure co the part of the applicant to submit a final plat per Section 22.13 within one year from the date of this approval shall deem the preliminary approval null and void. PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 86-542 RESOLUTION B6- 1 q 2 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING CO~ISSION TO APPROVE A LOT WIDTH VARIANCE AND FINAL SUBDIVISION OF LAND FOR LOT }, BLOCK 9, AND THAT PART OF VACATED IVY LANE LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CENTER LINE THEREOF AND EXTENDING FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LAKESIDE ROAD TO THE SHORE OF LAKE MINNETONKA, SHADYWOOD POINT, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF~ P.I.D. #18-117-2} }2 WHEREAS, Tom and Judy Ess, fee owners of the property described as Lot 3, Block ~, and that part of vacated Ivy Lane lying northeasterly of the center line thereof and extending from the southeasterly line of Lakeslde Road to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, Shadywood Point, according to the recorded plat thereof, P.I.D. #18-117-2~ 32 0015 have applied for a lot subdivision and lot wiath variance; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property such that strict application of the orOinance would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of his land; and a waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property right; and that granting the waiver will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injuries to other property owners; and WHEREAS, the City Codes requires a minimum lot width of 60 feet at the front setback line; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval of the subdivision and lot width variance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, Odes hereby approve the lot width variance of l0 feet anO grants a subdivision of land as follows: It is hereby granted to permit the subdivision in the following Manner: Parcel A: Lot 3, Block 2, Shadywood Point. Parcel B: That part of vacated Ivy Lane lying northeasterly of the center line thereof and extenOing from the southeasterly line of Lakeside Road to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, ShaOywood Point. Be Said subdivision is granted subject to the condition that Parcel B is combined with Lots I to 6, Block lb, Shadywood Point, together with the southwesterly half of vacated Ivy Lane adjoining Lots i to 7 of said Block lb, also known R.I.D. #18-117-23 32 0016. Ee Said lot width variance applies to Parcel A. The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the applicant for filin~ in the office of the County RecorOer or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City. This lot SUbdivision is to be filed ano recorOed within 180 days of the a~option of this resolution. PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 86-541&542 RESOLUTION NO. 86.- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF SHADYWOOD POINT 2ND ADDITION P.I.D. NUMBERS 18-117-23 32 0015 AhD 18-117-2~ 32 0016 LOT 1 TO 6, BLOCK 10 ~ VACATED IVY LA~, S~DYWOOD POINT WFE]REAS, the final plat of SHADYWOOD POINT 2ND ADOITION has been submitted in the manner required for platting of land under the City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 22.00 and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statute and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and WHEREAS, the City Council, on September 30, 1986, held a public hearing pursuant to Section 22.00, Chapter22, of th, Mound City Code of Ordinances, to consider the approval of the preiiminary pIat for SHADYWOOD POINT 2NOADDITION subdivision located on property described as follows: That part of vacated Ivy Lane lying no~theasteriy of the center line thereof and extending from the southeasterly line of Lakeside Road to the shore of Lake Minnetonka, SHADYWOOD POINT, according to the recorded plat thereof, aiso known as part of P.I.D. #18-117-23 32 0015 and Lots 1 to 6, inclusive, Block 10, of said SHADYWOOD POINT, together with the southwesterly half of vacated Ivy Lane adjoining Lots 1 to 7 of said Block 10, also known as P.I.D. #18-117-23 32 0016. WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the Ordinances of the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: A. Plat approval is granted for SHADYWOOD POINT 2ND ADDITION as requested by Tom and 3udy. Ess upon compliance with the foilowing requirements: 1. As per final plat, Exhibit "A". me Completion of the requirements and conditions listed in Resolution B6-116. 132_ ® The Developer is to sign a Development Contract and furnish to the City a performance bond in the amount of $7,000.00 to cover grading, drainage and utiiity construction as per plans approved by the City Engineer. Approval is to be submitted from all agencies requiring review, such as MCWD, MPCA, Minnesota Health Department, DNa, etc. Approval of all final grading and utility plans by the City Engineer. RESOLUTION NO. PA~E TWO ,6. Submit additional escrow funds of $2,000.00 to defray city costs for Engineering, Legal and Planning fees and any additional amounts that may be charged against said account under City Ordinance Section 22.40. 0 City Attorney's title opinion approval and the review and approval of easement agreement for a common driveway to serve Lots 1 and 2. Park dedication in the amount of the fee which is applicable at the time of building permit issuance, but in no case less than $}00.00 per dwelling unit. 0 1-}/4 deficient street improvement unit charges in the amount of $1,828.15 per unit for a total of $},199.26 are to be paid. iO. One deficient sewer unit charge in the amount of $2~2.00 is to be paid. ll. Any proposed docks shall be reviewed and approved by the LNCD. Be That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the above named owner and subdivider after completion of the requirements for their use as required by M.S.A. 462.558. That the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the certificate of approvaI on behaif of the City Councii upon compiiance with the foregoing resoiution. This final plat shall be filed and recorded within 60 days of the date of the signing of the hardsheiis by the Mayor and City Manager in accordance with Section 22.00 of the City Code and shaiI be recorded within iSOdays of the adoption date of this Resoiution with one copy being fiied with the City of Mound. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such execution of the certificate upon said piat by the Mayor and City Manager shaii be conciusive showing of proper compiiance therewith by the subdivider and City OfficiaIs and shaii entitIe such piat to be piaced on record forthwith without further formaiity, all in compiiance with M.S.A. 462 and th Ordinance of the City. 'q D / / / / ,2 I N i- rn Z 0 Z OiTY OF MOUND. OPERATIONS PERMIT-APPLICATION Sec{ion I - Applicant Information 4o T~-~cjal Descr_iption of t:~'o~: Lot: - Block 5 Addition Owner's Name ~L~ /J~/M Day Phone Address Applicant (if other th~n o~ner): Name Day Phone NO. Address Section 2 - Business Information Name of Business ~ &~O ' IZ,F /o~ Manufa~ng ~a ~-~~o ~use ~ea ]~/. ~_ ~les ~r ~ '~~ O~er (please ~cify~ '-' -~ 3. Describe Nature of Business Wholesale Retail 4. Location (cite unit number or attach floor plan) 5. Number of Employees: 1st Shift /5~ 2nd Shift 3rd Shift - 0 Adjacent Uses (list businesses)' Section 3 - Business Operations 1. Describe Products Produced or Services Offered (attach product brochures if available) ~ F ~ ~$ 2o What types o.~ materials will be shipped into and/or stored within the premises? Will materials be shipped by: rail other (spacify) se i =uck o Will delivery vehicles be stored on the propert~ Yes NO~.ve~ If yes, attach site plan showing parking stalls assigned to ~ehicles. Does the business p/an future expansions at ttds location? Yes No ~' . If yes, describe amount of anticipated ex[mnsio, and timing. Will the business require any modifications to the exterior of the existing building including but not limited to doors, windows, overhead doors, cooling towers, HVAC units, etc? Yes No ___~_____. If yes, please described and attach a floor 'plan and ext~~lding elevation drawings. 0 Will the proposed operation involve: Noise Generation: Yes No ~ . If yes, describe source and amotnt Odor Generat%on: Yes' source and amount · If yes, describe Toxic and/or Hazardous Waste Generation: Yes If yes, describe source and amount , I3 G Provide a c~tailed listing of all chemicals which will be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. . _~/~/~ ./~J4;Fz/~/ Will the operation include either interior or exterior storage of ~ chemicals? Yes No k' . If yes, attach floor plan and/or site plan showing location and describe spi11/1eakag9 containment provisions. Other than chemicals, will the oDeration require outdoor storage of an~ material, s? p~Y_e_s~ NO ~ . If y?S, describe materials and attach site sh~ing locations and identifying proposed screenxng by type and location. Section 4 - Certification I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained ~nan~ required papers and pL?ns to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry ~n or upon the premises described in this apDlicaticxl any authorized, official of the City of Mound for the 'purpose of inspecting, or of Dosting, maintaining and removing such notices as my be required by law. Signature of Applicant ~ Date ~7~/~~ Section 5 - City. Review and Action Reviewed by.- Building Official City Planner City .Engineer Fire Chief City Manager Other Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action Resolution No. Da~ August 13, 1985 RESOLUTION NO. 85-89 RESOLUTION GRANTING AN OPERATIONS PERMIT FOR LUNALITE, INC. AT 53~O SHORELINE BLVD. WHEREAS, Lunalite, Inc. (applicant) has' applied for an Operations Permit to operate an electrical lighting assembly operation which will occupy a total of 63,000 square feet (50,400 square feet in unit seven~ 2,700 square feet of converted dock space in unit seven and 9,900 square feet in unit six - see Exhibit 1); and . . WHEREAS, electrical lighting assembly operations are allowed by Operations Permit in Planned Industrial Areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: It is hereby determined that the Lunalite electrical lighting assembly operation is consistent with the criteria for granting Operational Permits found in Section 23.650.7 of the Mound Zoning Code, The Operations Permit is granted in accordance with the following conditions: b. de ee Based upon an employment estimate of 125 per' shift, Lunalite is hereby assigned a total of 125 of the spaces in the Tonkawest Business Center's parking facilities. Conversion of a portion of the existing loading dOck/area to office use is approved contin, gen~. up~/n the submittal of detailed architectura, ant b~ilding plans to the Building Official and City Planner for review and approval. Plan, S/for the modification of the existing pa~-~king facility on the east of the property i~clUding restriping shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer· If the.f applicant desires signage, a sign permit appli.cation consistent with the Mound Signage Ordinance and the theme for the entire structure's signage as submitted by Balboa MinneSota Company shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Mound. Outside storage including but not .limited tq raw materials, goods, delivery vehicles and trucks excluding those involved in loading or unloading August 13, 1985 is expressly prohibited. Ail off-street loading and unloading areas shall conform to the requirements of Section 23.717 of the Mound Zoning Code. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jessen and seconded by Councilmember Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson, Polston and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Attest: City Clerk 1111111 ...... ,;..-~ I I '' I .! , .2 Application No. Fee P~id - - Date File~. 3/14/86 ~ ...... CITY OF MOUND OPERATIONS PERMIT 'APPLICATION' Section I - Applicant Information Addre ~ 1. Street ss of Property 5300 .Sho~lf~fe Blvd, 2. Legal Description of Property: Lot - Block 5 and 6 -- Addition __~Sylvan Hts Addn Plat 6217~- PIb No. 13-117_24234_0066 3. Owner's Name Falb~a-:Mn3:." ~. ..... Day Phone No, 472-1400 Address 5340 Shoreline BoUl~v. ard Mound, MN 55346 4. Applicant (if other than owner): Name The Toro Co./Lunalite Addres-~-~300 Shoreline Boule%ard Day Phone No. 472-366______~6 Section 2 - Business Name of Business I. unalite and The Toro Co. Total Floor Area 8600 Manufacturing Are~ 2 ! 00 Sales Floor Area Describe Nature of Business Office Area 4500 Warehouse A~ea 2000 Ot~er (please specify) Manufacturing and R & D _ Who esa e _ , o Reta~ · _ O 4. Location (cite unit number or attach floor plan) 5. Number of Employees: 1st Shift 12 2nd Shift 2 3rd Shift 2 6. Adjacent Uses (list businesses) Solariam,, Lunalfte Section 3 - Business Operations, Describe Products Produced or Services Offered (attach product brochures if available) Mfg- Plastic Injection Molding R&D - New Products What types of materials will be shipped into and/or stored within the premises? Raw Plastic/Finished Plastic ~ Will materials be shipped by: other (specify) rail semi truck x Will delivery vehicles be stor.ed on the property? Yes No X · If yes, attach site plan showing parking stalls assigned to delivery vehicles· Does the business plan future expansions at this location? Yes No X · If yes, describe amount of anticipated expansio~ and timing. Will the business require any modifications to the exterior of the existing building including but not limited tod.ors, windows, overhead doors, cooling towers, HVAC units, etc? Yes No X . .If yes, please described and attach a floor 'plan and exterior buildxng elevaticn drawings. Other ~han office entrance and windows already complete Will the proposed operation involve: Noise Generation: No X . If yes, describe source and amount ~es Odor Generat J. on: Yes' source and amount No x Toxic and/or Hazardous Waste Generation: If yes, describe source and amount · If *yes, describe Yes No x Provide a detailed listing of all chemicals which will be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. None planned o0 Will the operation include either interior or exterior storage of bulk · chemicals? Yes No X . If. yes, a. ttach floor plan and/or site plan showing location and describe spill/leakage containment provisions. - Other than chemicals, will the operation require outdoor storage of any materials? Yes No X . If yes, describe materials and attach site plan ~howing locations and identifying proposed screening by type and location. Section 4 - Certification, I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers and plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry .in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the 'purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and re~v_j~ch notices as may be required by law. Sectio~ 5 - City. Review and Action, Reviewed by: Building Official City Planner City .~ngineer Fire-Chief City Manager Other Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action Resolution No. Date 177 September 16, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86-111 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COHHISSION TO APPROVE VARIANCE TO ZONING CODE SECTION 23.40? FOR LOT 2, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT G, PID f2q-117-24 24 0017 P & Z CISE #86-536 WHEREAS, Judge Wolner has applied for a variance to allow a detached accessory building on a vacant parcel of land on Lot 2, Shirley Hills Unit G (2650 Lakewood Lane); and .. WHEREAS~ City Code flor R-~ zon~n~ residential Section 2~.q07 state~ nno accessory bu~ldLn~ or structure ~hall be constructed on any re~dential lot prior to the .time of construction o~ the prin~e~pal bu~ld~n~ to which accessorynj and ~HER~ASe the PlennLn~ CommL~s~oLn has reviewed the request ~nd doe~ recommend approval off the request to construct 22 by 26 foot' accessory buLldLn~ on Lot 2, ShLrle~ NO~, THEREFORe, BE IT RESOLVED that the CLt~ Council the City of ~ound, Minnesota, doe~ hereby approve the variance requested to con~truct e detached accessory buLldLn~ on Lot ~hLrley H~lle Unit 6 upon the condition that Lot~ Shirley HiLLs Unit G be combined es one tax p~rcel 2~ 2~ 0017/0018 (2660 L~ke~ood L~ne). The forego~n~ re~olutLon we~ moved b~ CouneLlmember P~ul~en ~nd ~econded b~ Co~ncLlmember .Peter~on. The following CouncLlmember~ voted Ln the ge~en, Peri,eh, Peter~on, Pol~ton and Smith. The follo~n~ Counc~lmember~ voted in'the negative: ~O~, . Attest: City Clerk ADDRESS 2660 1~akewmed Lane Permit NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot T~e, Shirley H[IlmBlk. guit O.xm~Xm~n SITE AREA c~,~ ~q. Ft. AREA OF SITE OCCUPIED BY BUILDI~S nsec Sq. Ft. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLI~ Thts fo~ need not ~ used ~en plot plans dra~ to scale of not less than ~"-~0' a~ f~led w~th pe~t application. (Each butld~ng s~te must have a separate plot plan.) For n~ buildings provtde the following ~nfo~tton: Elevation of ex~sttng ~ ad~otn~ng yard grades~ locatton of p~posed consturctton and extst~ng ~mp~ve- ~nts; sh~ building, stte, and setback dt~ns~ons. Sh~ easement, ftn~sh contours or draJnage, ~rst floor elevation, street elevatto~ and s~er - se~tce elevation. Sh~ location of water, s~er, gas and e~ectrtcal se~tce 11nes. Sh~ locatton of survey ptns wtth elevations. Spectfy the use of each butldn~ and ~or portton the~of. To ~ c~pleted by. a registered land surveyor. CASE NO. 86-536 I/We certify the! the proposed conslru~ion will conform to the dimensions and above and no changes will be made without ~ $$3~ BOX 1~8 t/~e I/flcs - est b ~pos. !Gory Lo~s 19 * $! ( CO I I I I I00 30/ 19 / 18 ! ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::7:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::~::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: Planning Commission Minutes October 6, 1986 CASE NO. 86-546 BOARD OF APPEALS.... .. 1. Case No. '86-546 Variance recognizing existing nonconforming lot size and set- backs; Lot 23,'Block 5, ShEdywood Point; PID 13-117-24 ll' 0033 Applicant BaKYy Rettke was present and also neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Stokke. The BuildingOfficial, Jan Bertrand, explained that in 1977, they were granted a side yard setback va-riance in order to improve the existing home. It has a 3.8 to 4.4' side yard on. the n~rthwest corner . At that tlme, home was enlarged and a deck added. Applicant' is asking again to recognize an undersized lot and also nonconforming, sldeyard to expand the lower.level below the existing deck which is the 16 feet shown on the survey. She statedaPplicant is purchasing the lots alongside him to the west and there is the possibility of his having conforming lot size. She is recommending"approval of the expansion as perimeter of the existing structure will not be expanded to make more nonconforming. The neighbor on Lot 22, Mr. Stokke, stated he is in favor of allowing the expansion. The Planning Commission. questioned zoning on the block and if it had been part of. 0rono (always been in Mound), if zoning had changed, size of other lots on block. Requbst was'discussed and that if applicant owns Lots 24 and 25 to the west, he could'have two very close to conformihg lots; also that the existing structure and proposedaddition wou4d than be within the setback requirements with a combinetioh/division of land. Reese moved to cure the nonC~nformancy .by requiring Lot 24~be split and joined with 23 and 25 to make them as near conforming as reasonable'and to recommend tw° building sites be allowed without further reference to the Planning Commis- sion and Council..being required (as the proposed lots would each be within 10% of the minimum lO,000 square foot size required), by 130 square 'Rettke stated he likes the small lot; Wanted the 100/feet of Lots 24 and 25 to be one parcel and not have part of it added to his existing property. The Building Official stated the Planning Commission was changing request from ~ariance to subdivision. Michael stated he felt Commission should act on the original request. Commission discussed procedure and then asked applicant if he'would he'agreeable to subdivision of the. lots into two parcels. Assessments for lot was also discussed.. Applicant wants to get his addition started and would be agreeable to a subdivision. Reese withdrew his .motion. Thal moved and Weiland seconded a motion to deny the variance requested. The vote was unanimously in favor. Thal moved and Ken Smith seconded a motion to approve the request to split Lot.24 between 25 and 23 to make two buildable sites; walvering of public hearing and all of the provisions of the subdivision ordinance as it will not increase the number of building sites. The vote on the motion was unanimously in favor. Applicant was asked to come in to City Office to fill out subdivision application. This will be heard by the City Council on October 14, 1986. CASE N0.86-546 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM; Jan Bertrand, Building Official Planning Commission Agenda of October 6, 1986 CASE NO. 86-546 APPLICANT: Barry Rettke LOCATION: 1742 Resthaven Lane LEGAL DESC.: Lot 23, Block 5, Shadywood Point PID#13-117-24 11 0033 SUBJECT: Recognize existing non-conforming lot size and setbacks EXISTING ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential The applicant, Mr. Barry Rettke, is requesting that the Planning Commission and City Council recognize an existing undersize lot and setback to the side property line to expand the area under the 16 ft. by deck to additional living space. The R-1 zoning district requires a lot size of I0,000 sq. ft.. The setback to the side lot line of 10 feet and 6 feet based on the width for lots of record. The size of lot 23 is approximately 6,514 sq. ft. platted area A. The side yards of 3.8 and 7 feet. Mr. Rettke was given a variance to construct the addition shown on the survey in 1977 under Res. #77-405. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the rEquested'expansion of the'living, space.. The abutting vacant lot is owned by the applicant and could be combined with the undersized lot at a future date. The perimeter of the existing structure will not be expanded by the proposed expansion. The abutting neighbors have been notified. APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND OF LAND FEE CASE NO. 86-546 FEE OWNER Barry Rettke Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: To be divided All supporting documents, ·such as sketch plans, surveys, attachments, e~c. must be submi~ted':ln; 8~' X 11'~ size'~'nd/or 1~ copies plus-one ~'"'X 11" ~0Py~ {attach su~ey or scaJ~ dkawing shying adjacent street, dimension ~ proposed building sites, s~are foot area of each new parcel ~si~at~ by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet Reason: t (signature) Applicant's interest in the property.~/O~. TEL'.NO. DATE This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an, explan- 'ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. SURVEYING, ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING tONG LAKE MINN 66464 47~-4141 RESOLUTION #86-145 EXHIBIT '%" 10-9-86 Proposed Descriptions for Barry G. Rettke In Lots 23, 24 and 25, Block 5, SHADYWOOD POINT Hennepin Co~/, Minnesota PARCEL A Lot 25 and the Northwesterly 25,00 feet of Lot 24, Block 5, SHADYWOOD POINT, Hennepin County, Minn. PARCEL B Lots 23 and 24, EXCEPT the Northwesterly 25.00 feet of said Lot 24, Block 5, SHADYWOOD POINT, Hennepin County, Minn. CITY OF HOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION (Please type the following Information) Street Address of Property ' ~ ~/L~o ~/X~ Block Legal DesCription of Property: Lot AddJtlon_.~~~l~~. Owner"s Name~~~~2~ Address '~-~7/~"~ Case .o. ,,-u (:,.) Fee Paid _~-o Date Filed ~/~/~ PlO No. /.3 -/ Day Phone No. /~/2~ ":~'~:~" Appl Icant (i f' other than owner) Name Day Phone No. Address Type of Request: (~Varlance ( ) ~ondltlonal Use Permit ( ) Amendment ( ') Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Sign Permit ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U~i' ( )*Other *If other, specify: e, e'resent Zohlng District 7- Existing Use(s) of Property · - _'d'-/~" - I~' o dltional use ermlt or 8. Has an application ever been made for zoRlng, variance, or c n p other zoning procedure for this property? ~'~' If so, list dale(s) o~ ~ list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) ~ ~.~_~_~_~_ Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above gtatements and the statements contained In any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to. the entry in or upon the premises described In this application by any~uthorized offlclal of the City of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be require~y law.. ~/~/~.~ e.~~_~_.~ Signature of Applicant ~r~~/ _ Oat Planning Commisslon Recommen~tlon: Date Council Action: Resolutlon No. Date ' ~Reques~ for Zon'i.ng Variance Procedure (:,) D. Loca'tion of: Signs, eesements underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction .F. A~y additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning O;dlnance. III. Request for a Zoning Variance A. A11.informatlon below, a site plan, as descr'ibed in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing.will be scheduled. B. Does.the present use of. the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it Is located? Yes If !'no", specify each n~n-conforming use: Ce De Do .the exlstlng.structures comply with all area height and bulk.regulatlons for the zone district in'which l't'is.located? Yes j~) No' (~ If.'no", specify each non-conforming use: ~/hich unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent Its 'reasonable use for any of the .uses.permi't;ted in that zoning.district? ( ) .Too n. arrow ( . ) Topography ( ) Soil (;:~-.) Too. small :- - ( )' Oralnage. ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: E® Was-the hardship described abOVe 'created by the action of anyone havl.ng property interests in the land after 'the Zohing Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No ~ if yes, explain: Fe Was the hardship created by"any"other man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (~ If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for'which:you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ~ No ( ) If no, how many other properties are slmilarly affected? '~.that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land2 What ls the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) To use and enclose the area under the ex±sting deck £o~ mo~e ~±ving space; the perimeter o~ the existing building ~rill nnt h~ ~ill granting of the variance be materially d~trlm~ntal to property in the same z~ne, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? J Plat of sU'~vey for b~r~.,' C. Rettke 'Lot ~3, Block 5, Shadywood Point He~ueoin Co~znt2~, F. tnnesota Certt fic:~te of 'Stu-vey: I nere~.r eert!f? that t?:!s is ~ tru~ .~r,d correct reuresent~t~-on of ~, .~u--,,ey of %?:e. boundaries of Lot 2.3, w_Iock 5, Sha~-ywocd Point, ~n.'! th.-. location o:' all e~-~.sting bui~:',ings thereo..-. It does not pur..nort to shou other improve,~euts or encroachments. Scale: l" = ,Dete : 8-15-77 o : Iron ~rker Gore. on b',nd Si.u-vezot a~ Planner Long ~k:'.', :[ir. nesota PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. 86-54~ RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDA- TION AND APPROVE A FINAL SUBDIVISION OF LAND FOR LOTS 23, 24, AND 25, BLOCK 5, SHADYWOOD POINT PID NUMBERS 13-117-24 1! 0033/0034/0035 (1742 RESTHAVEN LANE) P & Z Case No. 86-546 .WHEREAS, an application has been submitted to approve a variance to allow the construction of a 20 by 12 foot plus 4 foot 6 inch by 9 foot 9 inch+ enclosed area under an existing deck; and -- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the requested variance and does recommend a subdivision of land to allow conforming lot size and set- backs; and WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision requirements con- tained in Section 22.OO of the City Code has been filed with the City of Mound by the applicant, Barry Rettke, with a revised request; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property such that the strict application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; and that the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The.request of the ~ Hou~r~d-for a waiver from the provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code and the request to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as follows: Lots 23, 24 and 25, Block 5, Shadywood Point PID Numbers 13-117-24 ll 0033/0034/0035 A. It is. hereby granted to permlt the subdivision in the following manner, as per Exhibit A: Parcel A: Lot 25 and the Northwesterly 25.00 feet of Lot 24, Block 5, SHADYWOOD POINT, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel B: Lot 23 and 24, EXCEPT the Northwesterly 25.OO feet of said Lot 24, Block 5, SHADYWOOD POINT~ Hennepin County, Minnesota. B. Upon the further following conditions: 1. Parcel A and Parcel B are considered individual building construc- tion sites with lot areas within ten percent of the I0,000 square PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 86-546 - Page 2 foot requirement. 2. The lot division will be as close as possible to splitting Lot 24 in half, with 23 receiving a portion of Lot 24 and Lot 25 combined with a portion of Lot 24. 3. No additional unit charges or park dedication fee will be required as the property will not contain additional building sites. C. It is determined that the foregoing subdivision will constitute a desirable and stable community devel.opment and it is in harmony with the adjacent properties. D.' The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of this resolu.tion to the applicant for filing in the office of the Register of Deeds or the 'Registrar. of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City. E. This lot subdivision is to be filed and recorded within 180 days of the adoption date of this resolution. F. The'developer is to provide water and sewer utillty connections from the main at the time of development. RESOLUTION NO. 77 - qO5 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR NITH THE PLANNING COHHISSION REC0HHENDATION APPROVING THE 6.2 FOOT VARIANCE ON THE N.W. SIDE YARD & ALSO A 1.5 FOOT VARIANCE ON THE OTHER SIDE YARD WHEREAS, owner of property described as Lot 23, Block 5, Shadywood Point has applied for a side yard variance of 6.2 feet on the northwest side yard and a 1.5 foot variance on the other side yard, and WHEREAS, it appears there is no land available to add to this under- sized lot. /IOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ClTY'COUNCIL OF HOUND, HOUND, :HilNNESOTA: That Council concurs with Planning Commission recommendation approving the 6.2 foot variance o~ the nbrthwest side yard and also a 1.5 foot variance on the other side yard. Adopted by Council this 13th day of September, 1977.' 77-~05 9-13-77 ! t / CASE NO. 86-547 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official ~ Planning Commission Agenda of October 6, 1986 CASE NO. 86-547 APPLICANT:. Henry and June Radintz LOCATION: 4894 Edgewater Drive LEGAL DESC.: Lot 10, Skarp and Lindquist's RaVenswood PID # 13-117-24 /~1 0008 SUBJECT: FrOnt Yard Setback Variance' EXISTING ZONING: R-2 Single Family Residential The applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Henry Radintz, are requesting a variance to the front property line to allow a 22 by 26 foot garage to be constructed in the same location-as the existing detached accessory building. The Zoning Ordinance Section 23.407 allows a front yard setback of 8 feet and a 4 foot side yard setback on lakeshore lOts'fordetached accessory buildlngs with the garage doors facing the side property line. Mr. and Mrs. Radintz are proposing to change the existing garage doors facing south to Edgewater Drive to face'the side property )ina at the northeast. The setbacks requested would be in line with the existing detached garage approximately 2 feet to the front property line. This would al)ow them to preserve the existing mature maple tree to the east of the existing garage. The site condition has a neighbor's driveway to the southwest approaching Edge- water Drive. Edgewater Drive swings to the northwest direction which makes visibility difficult from the neighboring driveway. RECOMMENDATION: Staff woutd recommend granting a five foot setback variance to allow the construction of a 26 by 22 foot detached accessory building. How- ever, the southeast wal] of the garage should be parallel to the front property line thereby the side yard setback would be less than 4 feet at the northwest corner. This would allow the neighbor additional visibility to the northeast upon approaching the Edgewater Drive right-of-way. The variance approval should also be conditioned upon the 6 foot privacy fence being relocated 20 feet from the front property line or the variance should include approval in the same location. The abutting neighbors have been notified. JB/ms CITY OF HOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION (Please type the following information) Application No. Fee Pa Date Fi led I. Street Address of Property a89~ Edgevater Dr£ve Legal Description of Property: Lot Addition Skarp and Lindquist's Ravenswood Owner's Name Henry and ~une RadLutz XO PID No. Block 13-1ZT-Z~ aZ 0008 Day Phone No. aTZ-3757 Address ~89~ Edgewater Drive Applicant '(if other than owner): Name Address Day Phone No. Type of Request: e (x) Variance ( ) ConditiOnal Use Permit ( ) Zonlng Interpretation & R~yiew ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. (.) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other *If other, specify: Present Zoning District Existing Use(s) of Property Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use .permit or other zoning procedure for this property? ~o If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above ~tatements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized officlal of the City of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required Signature °f Applicant ./~'7 Date planning Commission Recommendation:V Date Council Action: Resolution No. · R~quest for Zoning Variance Procedure (2) Case # O. Location o{: Signs, easements, underground ut~llt~es, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and appllcable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zoning Variance A. Al1 information below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing wi]l'be scheduled. B. Does the present use of:the property conform to.a]/] use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes(~) f~o ( ) If '~no~, specify each non-conforming use: Ce Do the existing structures comply with all area heig~ and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes (~) No ( ) If ~'no~, specify each non-conforming use: /- Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable.use for any of the uses permit'ted in that zoning district? ( ) Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape (b/) Other: Specify: Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after-the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (~t) If yes, explaln: F. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (y) If yes, explain: ~ only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~,~ No ( ) Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. 'sheets, if necessary.) (Specify, using Attach additional Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of' this ordinance? CERTIFICATE .OF SURVEY ./t,~' - - -,,,,,~ ,~A Y ) " ' ' ,,,,//- . ~, · .. · :.,,, .... , .. ... .'.. ~. _~.,, ~'::'.. "' "? '"".,0.-~_ ~"', Denotes iron monument Denotes offset stake Denotes existing elev. Denotes Proposed elev. Denotes surface drainage Proposed garage floor elev. o X 000.0 ( ooo.o ) EDMARS - GABRIEL 'SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth MN 55441 Phone: (612) 559-0908 Proposed lowest floor el~v. = Proposed t~p of foundation elev. - BENCH MARK: I hereby certify that this is a true and'correct representation of a survey of File No. the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. ~-~<~¢~ ' AS sur e) dby me this ~-' , ~'~ day of /~/~'C'"/~ 19<~<:~ Book - Pa~ September ~8~8 Edge~ster Dr, ~ound, ~ 55~6~ Planning Commission City of Hound 53~1 ltay~ood Ave. 14ound, 1~1 Dear Nembers of the Planning Commission~ Our neighbor, Henry Radintz, has discussed the proposed expansion of his garage with me. I have no objection to this proposal as it will have no adverse effect on my property.' Sincerely, Robert Brose September 16, 1986 ~890 Edgewater Dr. )found, 14N ~6~ Plannin9 Comm~ssion City of ~ound 5321 Hay~ood,Ave. Mound, MN ~36~ Dear Members Of the Plannin9 Commission= Our neighbor, Henry Radintz, has 4~scussed the proposed expansion of his garage with me. Since the garage is on the opposite side of the lot from our house and garage, I have no objection to this proposal. Sincerely, David Painter N~Cj '~ PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 86-547 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACK, RECONSTRUCT A GARAGE WITH A 6 FOOT VARIANCE FOR LOT 10, SKARP AND LINDQUIST'S RAVENSWOOD, PID NO. ]3-117-24 41 0008, P & Z Case No. 86-547 (4894 Edgewater Drive) WHEREAS, Henry and June Radintz, the ownemof the property described as Lot 10, Skarp and Lindquist's Ravenswood, PID No. 13-117-24 41 0008 (4894 Edgewater Drive) have applied for a variance to allow the construction of a 22 by 26 foot detached accessory building to be constructed in the same location as the existing detached building; and WHEREAS,' the existing structure'has a nonconforming setback of 2.7 to 5.9 foot to the southeast property line, the second storage building has nonconforming setbacks to the northeast property line, and the privacy fence has nonconforming height in the front yard location; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires an '8 foot front yard setback to a detached accessory building with the doors facing the side lot line and a 4 foOt' side yard setback, also a 48 inch maximum fence height in the front yard setback; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the requested front yard garage accessory building setback. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve a 6 foot front yard variance to allow the construction of a new detached accessory building with the doors facing the side property line with conforming side yard setback to allow the property owner reasonable use of his land and due to the preservation of the maple tree in the front yard location for Lot 10, Skarp and Lindquist's Ravenswood, PID Number 13-117-24 41 0008 (4894 Edgewater Drive). of MOUND CITY (612) 472-1155 TO: FROH; DATE: SUBJECT;' Charles Weed,'600 North Lilac, Apt. 100, Golden V~T1ev. ~N.' 55q~6 Jan Bertrand, Buildlpg 0fflclal~o. 5Z1-1322 September. 12, 1986 Shof~ Inspection of home at q519 line Drive, Spring Park, Hinnesota, to be moved into the City of Hound When a structure Is moved or relocated, It must conform to the requirements for a new structUre under, the provisions of the UnlformBullding.Code, State of Hlnnesota,~ Section lOq. I have made an inspection on September lOth and August 28th of the structure and I have found the following alterations, replace- ments and repairs which'must be made to*thls strUcture, if relocated into the Clty of Hound. 1. A moving permit fOr the City of Houndwould be obtained by a State licensed house mover.In the amount of $$0.00 plus proof of insurance and cash deposit or bond to move structures over CI~y streets. 2. Yard grading Including sodding, Sidewalks, new house ent'ry 'stoops are to be provided. 3. A new foundation would be required under this structure with beam and sup- port system In compliance with the Building Code; the structure would be properly anchored, damp proofing applied, and foundation insulation properly placed where necessary. q.. Construction blueprints would be required to permit approval of the alter- ations to floor plan, heating layout, survey, information as per attached; a cross section, foundation, energy calculat|ons as per new construction information is attached for your convenience. 5. The new site would require 2 off street parking stalls (650 square feet of area minimum); the survey would require an indication of the future garage if an accessory building were not planned at the time of the building re- location. 6, Provide a new basement stairways and handrails to code. 7. Insulation of the structure must met model energy code, 1~82 Edition of the State Bullding Code (see attached energy calculatlon worksheet). Due to the amount of work required to bring the inspecte~ structure up to current building code requirement, it is my recommendation that the building not be relocated into the City of Hound. LETTER TO.' Charles .l~eed September 12, 198~; - Page 2. The exterior, of. the dwel 1 lng ~)uld' rec~u! i'e.new Stoops and,entry: stal nvays, the exlst|ng attached garage Would. be removed, .the'existing hardboard'siding Is In'fair.rio.poor condition and ~ouid'.b.e removed' from the structure ,' . the exl sting ·roof. covering ls l.n'poof ~'condltion..wlth the second floor ]-ndicat~ng glgns of water leakage, the brlck.~h.Tmne¥ 'Is' deteriorated-andwould, need to be removed at' :least- to the roof line...The.ex-lstlng structure-has aluminum .combination storms and.screens In poor condition wLth the'-windo~s:.belng .approxi- mately 25 y~ars,.o[d In 'need of puttY',',pa'l'.nt::and-so.me .signs of rot:..deterloratlon, exterl'or' doors aFe' in poor' Condll:$on-wi'th-th.e frames and storms..needlng .repl.ace- ment and repal:r, :The' rafters .ar~ 2 .by q,. 16 Inch'or~ center; w.lth.evidence of. water penetrat.ion- from. the roofl:ng .and- a...sag,..tp the .roof'from. undetermined cause Is evident' at-the tlme of'..my'.:l.nspectTon.-, posslbly',.from Improper'ties to the dormer portion that was.not":.vlslble at .the time. of my ins. pectlon. The upper level' sleeping'.rooms and.:l~ath Were acoustical' tl;le cel lb;gs..showlng signs of water'stain,"panel..!.ng thro. ughout:.ha]l~ay, bedrooms~ wi. th.al:! painted woodwork needlng'.r&palr.' The wlndows:-!i~ .the upper level .had .no hardware handles nor locks.' Interior doors and hardware'were. In poor ~bndl;tlon throughout'the upper levelo The second flOOr floor Joists ~ere-2 by 10, .16. Inch'on center'. Waste 'and vent :plp!ng, water Plplng, water heater and.existing, gas piping were in good to-fait condition. A!1 .server. and. water connect, lons',lnto the .home. must meet Hlnnesota'Plumbl.ng Code m!n3mum"standard' for ~ew construction. A11 elect'fica1 .wi ring' must., meet 'current '19811 Natl. onai.:~lect'~ici'Code'; lnsta-ll " ground fault' interrup.tlo~.where requ'ired, 20' amp. kitchen circu!t, 3 e~.ectrlcally .. wired smoke aiarms adjacent tO sleeping areas"and .Tn basement with interconnec- tlon, etc. The forced air gas furnace,.' al r ConditiOning, ~um. ldifier and .alr cleaner are approxlmatel.y;lO years old. 13~BTU furnace would-require testing of. the' heat exchanger' by a .licensed contractor.: to assure the heat exchanger ls In good condition as well 'as a11' safety contro'ls on the heating plant for .proper opera- tion of the' furnace including instal latlon'of a combustion air. duct from the outside,T~'The.;fl rst floor, bathroom toward the nort. h bedroom ~ould requi re com-- plete remoyal'.and' reno~ation. The floor coverings are In. good to falr condi- tion, The-kitchen-cupboards and appliances are in good condition. The wood- work and doors 'would 'need to be sanded, varnished and/or pain.ted tw~ coats. The fireplace was fire damaged In 1977. A permit ~vas obtained for repair. The structure had .an addltion put on. in 1977 according to Spring Park permit records. During my last Inspection of September'lOth, I mentioned to·you that my decision would be not to a11o~ the home to be relocated Into.Hound. However, you would have the option of appealing my decision to the City Council. If you choose to go before the City Council wlth your request, please contact our City Hanager~s office, Hr, Ed Shukle. He will arrange for you to hav~ a hearing before the Clty Counc!l. If I can be of any further assistance or if you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at my office, h72-1155. £nci. 17/ Division 2. Chapter 26 - Part A Page 3f a~.p~o, ved ~y the Commissioner of Natural 'Resources ~r~or to ~o~tion. Chang.~_s in. th~ Official Zoning t. lap relating to floo~ plain also re~ulre ~rlor a~rova.~ b~ .th~ Feaeral I~suraDce Aami~is~ration.. CQrd..r 38.6 9-27-78) '- .. SECTION 26:O7... Bu'~ldin9 Permlt~;'Fees. Each applicatlon shall be accompanied, b~ a fee in the amount set forth in Section 303 of the Uqiform Building Speclal inspections upon a request not covered by permit valu'ations as termlned under Section 303 of the UDC are to be charged at a rate of' $2~.00 per man per inspection or at a rate determined by the Building Inspector to cover any cost incurred by the City's Building Inspection Department· In addition to the aforementioned fees the City shall collect a Plan Check.Fee in the amount of one-half (1/2) of the Buildlng Permit Fee. The app'lic[:nt shall also pay to the City, for remittance to the State of 14innesota, 'surcharges as required pursuant to I.tinnesota Statutes, 'Section 16.865 other State laws or regulations. A11 fees ~hall be payab, le to the. Crib". Treasurer.' (Oral 382'' 6-28-78) ' SECTION 26.08 SECTION 26.10 SECTION '26.15 ~Building Permits:'Expiration. Repealed by 0r.d. ~6-6/19/75) Certlf'icate 'of Occupancy, Required. ~Repealed by Ord. 336 - 6/19/75 ,Special Inspectlon~ Waiver.. Repealed by Ord. ~'36 - 6/1~/75 '$ECTIO~ 26.16'1 P. ermit'reouire&~ ~uilding ~ovin~ -~ Fee~ I~. shall be un- . 1--~ful for an~ ~er~on, f~rm o: corporation to move an). build/n~ o: atruc£ ' tur~ ~n~o the_¥illage of P[oun~ from ar%~ ~lace outside the Village of ~.[ou o: ~bolly vith~ the ~illa~ of ].~o~ f:o~ one lot o: pa~c&l 'to another, -... o: from the Yillage to a point outside the ~illage ~$thoxxt f~s~ ma~g '" ' application to the ~uil&ing hereinafter provtde~. ~pon ~ki~ a~lic~tio~ fo: a p~t to move ~ch bxxil~, there shall be.paid m fee of ~.00 for ~rages a~ small out · · o: st~ctu:es. Sai~ fee 's~l~ be mef~e~ if the pe~it is :e~use~. ':e~ui:e~ for the moving of 'a~ buil&ing o: ~t~cture smaller in' si~e t~n .. the follow~g d~mensions: .8 feet. hi~, 10 feet ~ide"an& 1~ feet .long;.. sEcTION 26~16~ Confo~ity of'B~ilding or ~tructure to ~ildi~ Cod~. Required - ~ether or not'a petit is required, no building or.st~mctu=e shall be moved to a location ~it~n this village ~!ess it confo~s %o ~he addz~on to con~ · ~ty ~i~ code or codes, as mini~ requm.rement, .all "' plx~bing for such building or .st~ct~ shall %e by a li.c~nsea saute=, ..... pl~,ber, an~ residential bx~ildin~a shall have a 100 ampere se~ice. If construotion, alterations or repair work on such build~ or s%~ct~e " ~ill b& necessary to ~ake it~ confo~ to such re~latio~s~ pe~its for such Chapter 26 - Part A Page 3g pe~s shall m~%:e prqv~s~on for the doi~ of such york vithin 90 days deter such b~l~ing o~ st~cture ~s loca~e~ in this Village. ~ail~e to · ~e such buil~n~ or st~ct~o co~o~ to such const~ction ~e~mlations ~.ith~ sttch 90-~ay period shall ~onstitute a violation of thi4 ordinance, · a~d each day that s~ch ~iolation is continued after such ~0-day pezio~ shall constitute a scpmrate of~cn=c. ]~o such pc~it shall be ~anted except upon order of the Village Co~cil after favorable =eco~endatiom ' upon the application By the Village Pla~i~ Commission. ~e Village Co~cil ~y, at its discretion, require a public heari~ together with' ' advertis~ notice of hearing for its consideration toward the ~ting o~ denial of ~ch pe~it. N~ such ~il~ o= st~c[~e shall be' move~ to a locat~= wit~m the Village ~less it will confo~ to the zoni~ tions of the Villas, will confom to the f=on[yar~ an6 other setback an~ lot area ~equi~ements~ and will be a buildi~ o= st~ct~e, of the same general character and' appear~ce as other buildi~s o= st~ct~es An t~e vicinity. ~e. Village Oo~cil s~ll 6ete~ne whether or not such build- ing or st~cture will be per, tied at the proposed location. sECTION 26.194 Applicationt' Insurance~ Ynspectton~ 0on~tlons, Bond ~ the application required by this ordinance, the applicant shall'~ish the ~ildi~ ~specto= with such i~or~tion as he may reQui~e conce~i~ the size, location, method of const~ction, type of buildi~ or st~ct~e, R~oposed location, the equipment proposed to be used in th~ mo~, the proposed =cute, the propose~ leith of t~e t~t the buildi~ will Be upom the Village streets, the days and hours when such movi~ 'is to be . the fi~ncial responsibility of the applican~ ~d the ~su=ance protection '- ca~ied by the applicant. The application shall be accompanied by a proposed route and timetable of the move approved by the Village Chief of Police, Village Engineer, and gas, electric, and telephone utility companies as at such time are doing business within the Village. The application sballalAo be accompanied by a copy of an insurance policy insuring against liability'for personal jury or death occurring in the course of such moving with limits of lia- bility not less than ~1S0; 000. 00 for each individual and $3.00,000.00 for each o~currence and against liability for property damage with limits of liability not less than $~O,000.00 each occurrence. The application shall be required to be' accompanied by a plat of the proposed location showing . the proposed location with reference to the property lines and building the vicinity. (Ord. 3~5 - 4-11-74) The applicant shall give access to said building or structure to the Build- ing Inspector for the purpose of inspection and shall permit the Building Ynspector to inspect the equipment ~o be used in such moving. CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager ~ FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official DATE: October 9, 1986 SUBJECT: Appointment to Planning Commission At the Planning Commission meeting of October 6, 1986, the Planning Commission completed interviews with four interested citizens to replace Bob Byrnes as Commissioner. The Planning Commission unanimously chose Vernon P. Andersen for the unexpired term of Mr. Byrnes. However, I would recommend extending the new Commissioner's term through December 31, 1989. JB/ms in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. VERNON P. and SHIRLEY M. ANDERSEN PHONE 472-3233 2342 B COMMERCE BLVD. MOUND, MINN. 55364 August 28, 1986 Ed Shukle Cit~ Manager Mound, Minnesota 55&64 Dear Mr. Shukle: I am interested in the opening position on the Pl~ing Commission. I have been a resident of Mound for over 50 years, graduating from Mound High School. ! am also a local businessm~ in Mound. I am very interested in the present and future develop~ment of Mound and have very high hopes of it beco~'~g a leading community in the Lake area. If you have any question, you can reach me at my business or call me at 472-3233. Hoping to hear from you soon.. Vernon P. Andersen ,41 ?5" CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: ONE (1), NEW 1987 MODEL, ONE-HALF YARD SKIDSTEER LOADER The City of Mound hereby solicits bids for the purchase of One (1), New 1987 Model, One-Half Yard Skidsteer Loader. Complete sets of specifications are available from the City o'f Mound Park Works Department, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 or call 612/471-1251, ask for Joyce. Sealed bids will be opened and read aloud at 10:00 A.M., Friday, November 7, 1986, by the City Clerk, City of Mound in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road in said City. Francene C. Clark, CMC City Clerk Publish in The Laker October 21, 1986 Construction Bulletin N~r 17, 1986 Any deviation in detailed requirements must be noted on a separate sheet· Each bid must have descriptive literature. Bid Security: A cashier's check or certified che~ck in the amount of 5% of the total bid OR a bidder's bond in the amount of 10% of the, total bid, made out to the City of Mound, must accompany' each bid. Sealed bids should be clearly marked in the lower left hand corner of the envelope with the following: BID: ONE (1), NEW 1987 MODELs ONE-HALF YARD SKIDSTEER LOADER Bids should be sent to: City of Mound ATTN: CITY CLERK 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE (1); NEW 1987 MODEL; ONE-HALF YARD SKIDSTEER LOADER It is the intent of these specifications to describe equipment that is best suited to our needs. Length (without attachments) 105 inches (2667} Width (over tires) 61 inches (15~9) Height (with operator cab) 81 inches (2057) Weight - not to exceed without attachments or operator 5,980 lbs.'(2713 Kg) Bucket rating - SAE heaped min. 12.4 cu.ft. (0,35 cu.m.) Ground Clearance 8.3 inches (211) pERFORMANCE Clearance Circle, Front (w/bucket) Clearance Circle, Front (without bucket) Clearance Circle, Rear Height to bucket hinge pin (max.) Reach at Maximum height (min.) Cutting edge clearance bucket dumped 37 degrees) Digging bucket Reach, bucket on ground Max. rollback at ground Dump angle 6 full height Travel Speed Tipping Load - SAE Rated Operating Capacity - SAE Rated 77 inches (1956) q9 inches (1245) 64 inches (1626) 119.5 inches (3035) 29.5 inches (622) 94 inches (2388) 50 inches (1270) 25 degrees 37 degrees 0-6.3 MPH (0-10,1KPH) 3,~00 lbs. (15q2 Kg) 1,700'lbs. ( 771 Kg) HYDRAULIC SYSTEM Pump - Gear type.capable of providing 16.1 GPM .(60,9 L/min) for bucket and boom operation at 2125 PSI (1~652 kPa). Separate charge pump to provide charge oil to the hydrostatic pumps. Valves- Four spool, open center; lift (with float detent), bucket and auxiliary function standard ..equipment. Hydraulic bucket self-leveling to be provided as standard equipment. Cylinders - Double Acting Boom lift - 2.25" (57,2) bore - 1 1/2" (38,1) rod - 33.5" (851) stroke Bucket tilt- 3~25" (82,6) bore - 1 1/2" (38,1) rod - 17.96" (~56) stroke HYDRAULIC SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Time required to raise book to full height Lower boom from full height Dump bucket (fast dump position) Bucket rollback 4.3 seconds 2.9 seconds 2.3 seconds 2.0 seconds Paint will be a polyurethane coating. Hydrostatic ~ cylinder, liquid-cooled diesel, 5~ HP (~0,3 kW) at 2600 RPM. Spark arrestor muffler must be provided as standard equipment. Steering - forward, reverse, speed control and steering controlled by two independent hand levers. Boom - lift and tilt valves to be controlled by separate foot pedals (auxiliary valve control in right hand steering lever furnished as standard equipment). Instruments - instrument panel and condition indicators mounted overhead within the operator's line of ~sight. 12 x 16.5 - 6 ply floatation SAFETY EOUIPMENT' Operator cab and side screen provided as standard equipment. Operator cab to meet SAE specifications J1040 and JIO~B for Rollover Protective Structures and Falling Object Protection. Parking brake and work lights furnished as standard equipment. Seat belts must be furnished as standard equipment. Additional operator protection shall be provided by a seatbar or similar device which ~shall restrict loader operation when device not used. Grab handles must be provided as standard equipment to assist the operator mounting and dismounting the loader. Instructions: Operational instructions and Warnings by decals with pictorials and international symbols plus some messages in four basic languages: English, French, German and Spanish. Additionally, a weather resistant operator handbook in English (and also available in four languages) attached to loader. ATTACHMENTS 'Ail attachments must be mounted on quick change mechanism. No attachments will be considered that cannot be removed or mounted by an experienced operator in two (2) minutes. Backhoe mounting must be possible with lift arms in full down position. 66" heavy duty construction/industrial bucket provided for in bid as standard equipment. The manufacturer's standard warranty shall be an item of consideration. Manuals for the unit and attachments shall be delivered with the unit. A parts books s.hall also be delivered with the unit. REJECTION OF BIDS The City of Mound reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any minor informalities in the bid. LOCAL MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE The unit. shall be furnished by or through a local authorized company or representative. The supplies shall provide full-time repair service. Local is defined as being in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA BID PROPOSAL ONE (1), NEW 1987 MODEL, ONE-HALF YARD SKIDSTEER LOADER All bidders must submit bids on this form to furnish equipment as specified. All prices are to be F.O.B. Mound, Minnesota. MAKE MODEL COST WARRANTY Signature of Bidder Title Fi rm Da te Address City State Zip Code CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: ONE (1), NEW 1987 MODEL, 2 WHEEL DRIVE, 3/4 TON PICK-UP TRUCK AND TWO (2), NEW 1987 MODEL, 4 WHEEL DRIVE, 3/~ TON PICK-UP TRUCKS The City of Mound hereby solicits bids for the purchase of On~ (1), New 1987 Model, 2 Wheel Drive, 3/4 Ton Pick-Up Truck and Two (2), New 1987 Model, 4 Wheel Drive, 3/4 Ton Pick-Up Trucks. Complete sets of specifications are available from the City of Mound Public Works Department, §341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 or call 612/471-1251, ask for Joyce. Sealed bids will be opened and read aloud at 10:00 A.M., Friday, November 7, 1986, by the City Clerk, City of Mound in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road in said City. Francene C. Clark, CMC · City Clerk Publish in The Laker October 21, 1986 Construction Bulletin November 17, 1986 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS lny deviation in detailed requirements must be noted on a separate sheet· Each bid must have descriptive literature. _ Bid Security: A cashier's check or certified che~ck in the amount of 5% of the total bid OR a bidder's bond in the amount of 10% of the, total bid, made out to the City of Mound, must accompany' each bid. Sealed bids should be clearly marked in the lower left hand corner of the envelope with the following: BID: ONE (1), MEW 1987 NODEL, 2 I~HEEL DRIYE, 3/4 TON PICK-UP TRUCK Bids should be sent to: City of Mound ATTN: CITY CLERK 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE (1). NE~ 1987 MODEL. 2 I/HEEL DRIVE. 5/4 TON PICK-UP It is the intent of these specifications to describe equipment that is best suited to our needs. MINIMUM ENGINE SIZE ~.3 liter, fuel injected, ¥-6 TRANSMISSION ~ 3 speed automatloe MINIMUM G. V. W. 7,200 lbs. 7.50 x 16D, Front & Rear Radials Stainless steel below eye level (driver's side and passenger side) INSTRUMENTS Full Gauges (oil pressure, temperature and amp~) Electric windshield wipers, intermittent with washer. Power Assist Heavy duty power brakes White AM/FM MI~CELLANEOU~ Heavy duty front stabilizer bar. Dome lamp and cargo lamp. Tinted glass all windows. Heavy duty battery. Rear step bumper. Heavy duty tranmission oil cooler. Engine block heater. Heavy duty shocks. Heavy duty front springs. Extra capacity rear springs. Cloth seats. Rustproofing. WARRANTy The manufacturer,s standard warranty shall be an item of consideration. Manuals for the unit shall be delivered with the unit. REJECTION OF BIDR The City of MoUnd' reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any minor informalities in the bid. LOCAL MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE The unit shall be furnished by or through a local authorized company or representative. The supplier shall provide full-time repair service. Local is defined as being in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area.., CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA BID PROPOSAL ONE (1), NEN 1987 MODEL, 2 WHEEL DRIVE, 3/4 TON PICK-UP TRUCK All bidders must submit bids on this form to furnish equipment as specified. Ail prices are to be F.O.B. Mound, Minnesota. MAKE MODEL COST WARRANTY Signature of Bidder. . Title Fi rm Da te Address City Sgate Zip Code CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: ONE (1), NEW 1987 MODEL, 2 WHEEL DRIVE, 3/~ TON PICK-UP TRUCK AND - TWO (2), NEW 1987 MODEL, 4 WHEEL DRIVE, 3/4 TON PICK-UP TRUCKS The City of Mound hereby solicits bids for the purchase of One (1), New 1987 Model, 2 Wheel Drive, 3/4 Ton Pick-Up Truck and Two (2), New 1987 Model, 4 Wheel Drive, 3/4 Ton Pick-Up Trucks. Complete sets of specifications are available from the City of Mound Public Works Department, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 or call 612/471-1251, ask for Joyce. Sealed bids will be opened and read aloud at 10:00 A.M., Friday, November 7, 1986, by the City Clerk, City of 'Mound in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road in said City. Francene C. Clark, CMC ' City Clerk Publish in The Laker October 21, 1986 Construction Bulletin ~ 17, 1986 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS Any deviation in detailed requirements must be noted on a separate sheet· Each bid must have descriptive literature. Bid Security: A cashier's check or certified ch~ck in the amount of 5% of the total bid OR a bidder's bond in the amount of 10% of the, total bid, made out to the City of Mound, must accompany each bid. Sealed bids should be clearly marked in the'lower left hand corner of the envelope with the following: BID: TWO (2), NEW 1987 MODEL, Q WHEEL DRIVE, 3/~1 TON PICK-UP TRUCKS Bids should be sent to: City of Mound ATTN: CITY CLERK 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SPECIFICATIONS FOR T~0 (2)~ NE[/ lq87 MODELS~ ~ NHEEL DRIVE. 2/~ TON PICK-UP It is the intent of these specifications to describe equipment that is best suited to our needs. MINIMUM ENGINE SIZE 6.2 Diesel TRANSMISSION 3 speed automatic. ~INIMUM G. V. N. 8,500 lbs. LT235/85R 16E Front & Rear Stainless steel below eye level (driver's side and passenger side) INSTRUMENTS Full Gauges (oil pressure, temperature and amp.) Electric windshield wipers, intermittent with washer. Power Assist Heavy duty power brakes 1 truck white, 1 truck red AM/FM MISCELLANEOUS Heavy duty front stabilizer bar. Dome lamp and cargo lamp. Tinted glass all windows. Dual heavy duty batteries. Rear step bumper. Heavy duty tranmission oil cooler. Engine block heater. Quad front shocks. Heavy duty front springs. Extra capacity rear springs. Cloth seats. Rustproofing. Lockout hubs. The manufacturer's standard warranty shall be an item of consideration,. Manuals for the units shall be delivered with theunits. REJECTION OF BIDS The City of Mound reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any minor informalities in the bid. LOCAL MAINTENANCE AND SER¥ICE The units shall be furnished by or through a local authorized company or representative. The supplier shall provide full-time repair service. Local'is defined as being in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA BID PROPOSAL T~O (2), NE~ 1987 MODELS, 4 WHEEL DRIVE, 3/4 TON PICK-DP TRDCKS All bidders must submit bids on this form to furnish equipment as specified. All ~rices are to be F.O.B. Mound, Minnesota. MAKE MODEL COST EACH EXTENDED TOTAL WARRANTY Signature of Bidder Ti ti e Firm Date Address City State Zip Code HENNEPIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 935-3381 TTY935-6433 October 7, 1986 Mr. Edward d. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 53 · Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 CSAH 15 FROM CSAH 110 TO CSAH 19 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 8024 Dear Mr. Shukle: Thank you for sharing some tlme to review the CSAH 15 layout wlth members of my staff and I last Friday. As we discussed, I am enclosing the letter from Commissioner Braun which grants the variance from State Ald Standards for CSAH 15 from CSAH 110 (Commerce Boulevard) +~ CSAH 19 (Shadywood Road). It permlts a street width of 44~, with no parking, Instead of the requlred 52~; except that 52~ shall be provided between Willshlre and Commerce Boulevards. As we explained on Friday, the resolution (J84-179) passed on October 23, 1984 by the Mound Clty Council approves a preliminary layout showing a 44t roadway width from approxlmately 300~ east of the post office to Cypress Lane. My staff assures me that a 52~ roadway can be constructed on the proposed alignment but to provide the typical sectlon I.e., 52~ roadway with 5~ berms and 5~ sidewalks on each slde, addltional right of way Is necessary along the south side. We are currently preparing detail plans for this proJect and want to proceed without any uncertalntles about our design. Therefore, we are asking for an assurance from the City of Mound that we can proceed with a 52~ roadway on this segment of the project without any repercussions. Please advlse me accordingly. If I can be of further assistance or If you want me to meet wlth you, please let me know. Sincerel y, BMP:mak HENNEPIN COUNTY cc= v. T. Genz Ii nger, P.E. on equal opportunity employer ACqn~_ r.n,m-I-v Admlnl~+rafnr and County Enolneer ()ill('(' (.)J Cl')lllllil.%Nl()ll('f' August 7, 1985 I(i12) 2!x~ Vern Genzlinger Hennepin County Highway Engineer 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 In reply refer to: Request for Variance Dear Mr. Genzlinger: Upon the advice of a Variance Committee appointed expressly for the purpose of recommending to me the validity of Hennepin County's request for a variance from State Aid Rules § 8820.9912, I hereby grant the variance so as to permit a street width of 44 feet with no parking except that the full 52 feet, with no parking, shall be provided west of Willshire Boulevard to Commerce Boulevard. The variance is conditional upon receipt of a resolution by the County of Hennepin that indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State of Minnesota and all its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of actions of any nature or character arising out of or by reason of, in any manner, the reconstruction of Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) from Commerce Boulevard in Mound to Shadywood Road in Orono, in any other manner than as a 52' wide street with no parking when undivided or a 68' wide street with no parking when a 14 foot median is present in accordance with the Minnesota Rules § 8820.9912 and further agrees to defend at their sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising as a result of the .granting of this variance. Sincerely, Richard P. Braun Commissioner T~d ~ffmam- ~e~nepio C.E. Weic;melbaum, DtsZ. $ Film -~20 ..l,t Equ,:i Opp,,rtuntO Employer '~,~.2 274 October 23, 1984 RESOLUTION NO. 8~-179 RESOLUTION APPROVING HENNEPIN COUNTY PRELIMINARY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR CSAH NO. 15 WHEREAS, Hennepin County has presented a preliminary layout of CSAH 15 improvement reflecting the City Council's resolution passed on January 24, 1984; and WHEREAS, the County intends to seek County State Aid funding for this project, which would require a variance from State Aid standards from the Minnesota Department of Transportaion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the preliminary plan for CSAH 15 improvement be hereby approved, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mound concurs with Hennepin County's request to obtain a variance from the State Aid standards from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Charon and seconded by Councilmember Jessen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor 'Attest: City Clerk CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Director DATE: October 10, 1986' SUBJECT: Appointment to the Park Commission At the Park Commission Heeting of October 9, 1986, the Park Commission recommended the appointment of Shirley M. Andersen to 'fill the unexpired term of Robin Michael (December 1986). JF/ms An equal opportumty Emp;oyer that cloes not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status m the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. VERNOH P. and SHIRLEY ti. AHDERSL PHONE 472-3233 2342 B COY~ERCE BLVD. tiOUND, tilHH. 55364 September 25, 1986 Ed Shukle City Manager Mound, Minnesota 55~64 Dear Mr, Shukle.' T would like to be considered for the opening position an ~he P~rk Board. Y ~ave lived in Mound for 40 years and graduated from Mound High School. Z have raised 5 children in ~he district and now h~ve S grand- children who are currently going ~hrough the Wes~onka School system. ! am a local business person who owns and operates V & S Jewelry and Gifts for the last 17 years. r would like the opportunity to be involved in the process of making our parks and facilities a place for the entire community to be proud of. Sincerely, Shirley M. Andersen RESOLUTION NO. 86- October 14, 1986 RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE ELECTION JUDGES AS RECOMMENDED FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 4, 1986 BE IT RESOLYED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the following list of election judges for the General Election November 4, 1986. Lavonne Adams Gunhild Anderson Ann Bitney Holly Bostrom Emma Brandenburg Eunice Bren Gerrie Brewer Bob Brynes Lisa Bungert Chris Burlingame Robert Carl son Pinky Charon Ina Coleman Leatrice Cooper Sharon Corl Marion Davidson Elsie Dressel Arleen Filmore Theresa Gauvin Jan Gierman Marion Gilbertson Elaine Grove Thelma Gunderson Gladys Jackson Virginia Jerdee Betty Johnson Jeanette Johnson Kathy Kluth. Donna Lugauer Delores Maas Sharon Meier Alice Martin Helen Maxwell Joanne Mason Fernando Mazoleny Lee Mondloh Joyce Nelson Dorothy O'Brien Jeanne Olson Kathy Oman Danita Ownbey Marsha Peickert Shirley Phleger Rod Plaza Bernice Putt Irma Pysck Jean Robinson Charlotte Rogers Shirley Romness Joan Schoenecker Dee Schwalbe A1 Schwingler Ann Schwingl er Ada Shepherd Barbara Sidders Ardelle Skoglund Bud Skoglund Marsha Smith Marietta Smith Lemuel Sprow Cindy Stevens Linda Strong Fran Swanson Henry Vakoc Phyllis Vakoc Sandi Wilsey Clifford Wilson John Wilson Sandi Woytcke Carolyn Zachow The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: 1 October lq, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86- RESOLUTION REQUESTING CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN EASEMENTS ON TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY I/HEREAS, there are certain tax forfeit lots in the City of Mound which were taken for street purposes during the street projects; and WHEREAS, Lot 6, Block 34, Wychwood was one such lot that was taken in 1980 and the City Engineer has advised the City Clerk that there is only an easement that needs to be placed on this parcel before disposition can be made in an orderly fashion; and NOir, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnnesota, hereby authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to make application to the State of Minnesota for conveyance of the' following easement on the lot listed below. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2q-117-24 q2 0006 Lot 6, Block 34, Wychwood EASEMENT ON AROVE TO BE CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF MOUND A perpetual easement for street purposes ~¥~r, under and across the above described property:~6~ perpetual easement being that part of said Lot 6 lying Northwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 6 distant 10.00 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 6; thence northeasterly to a point on the north line of said Lot 6 distant 10.00 feet east of the northwest corner of said Lot 6 and there terminating. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: % Attest: City Clerk Mayor · ! I ! AFTON , · ~ .................... .'t~ ........... ~ ............................................... ,,:, t~ .......... ,~....:~'~...t .......................... I...:. ........... .~ ...... . --. ------1 ....... ,;~.1 ...................... ,,.-., ......... z- ~ ............. I' .'I~.- .,- ~.1 ~ ...~ .................... .g~=,..-' l~-...-tJ~t,.'ll-i...L~ ~.s..=. :..= ................................................................................................................................. '" '"::_:..-:/_'J:t2~ ,,a, ..................... ::.Z::: ::_,~ ........................................................ 4 .............................................................................................................. ............ :_::,__, .................... :::: :::::::.: ........................................ .,. ................ . ............................................................. . .............................................................. ............................................i::;l:;l[ ::::'.; .............................. ,: ................................ ~-°- ............................................... i ........................ ........... ......... : .................................... ................................ ' ....... .... · :::::::::::::::::::::::::: .................................. .......... , ...................... ............................................... , ..................... : -J,~ . ................................................... ......................................................................................... ~ ......................................... ,""O,t ....... ! .... I'" ,,, .......... H-I ........................ · .............................................................................. ,..- ..................." "~'!":: .......'[ .l' !. l't ............. ' ............ ' ................................... '2P ........ '""'t ~' ~ ~ .......... ~ ;:. Z::Z::::; ................ Z::E::.::i ................................... i..._Zi Z: ::::: Z.-..ZZ..: ..................................................................................... ::: ~- :: .......... 444 ....................................................................................... [i:'~ .......... .......... :":':::::::::::::I :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::: · .. ~ ........... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: :::::: :::::::::: .::.: ......... ,...: .................... ,_:..i ............................................. ~ ....... :..~ .............................. :: ..... ~ ....... ':" l' t I ~. ............................................................................................. ~ ............. ..................................... ~ ............. ~ ~' .............................. "' i~'~ '::'-"":::'ii'"['{ ........... :'::::: :: :::::::: ::::::::::::::::::~ ::,:::::::::: :: ....................................................................................... ~ ......................................................................................... ..... ~' I'"FI ............. i / ~ t : . , ~-......_,,: · '. ..... : ...... &.L.I ................... ........ ~ ................... :',.z ........................... I .................. , ........................................... ................................. : ....... ::::::::::::::::::::::: ................................. ~.~'-- ~ ~ ' · ' ........ I .................... ' ...................................................................... ~" ............................ :...-:::::: ::::::...-:.-_~~.. :::...,,.x..~,.. ............... ::"'2 ::2:::: :::::::::: ................. ............ ~ ~: ~< ............ r';'" :::::2::2::: ::...:.:::::::::::.:: ::::::Z ...................... :::::/: 1/. ~.;)'" ~ ..... i..--.."--:.-".: ::' ................ , ...................................................... ~...~ ................................... ~ ...................... ~ '~ ...............................................:Z:/:" N-~ ..................................... '4" .... i~/,N.~.......... ! .... ~ ....... : ,~3: ............ I ...... ~ 1, ~ ~,~.' .... ' ,' ....................... - , [ :"*'"~"~ ........ ~ .............................. v..~.y'~, ~ '1 I 1 I~ ' ' ; ~'~- ' . ! -- l----~,~'~' : . ...... ............ '.-. ~ .... 4...H .......................... ,.,-: .......................................... ::..:_~-'""-":: ......... :::---: "'-"~'- ::..: ......... ~ ,~ .... ........... J...L.~ ................................ I~"~ ................. .'.~ ...... .~.. ........ ~ ./_ ..................................... ~-.,. ~. ...........................................~l I-l. ~ .......................................... ~7-,,:. ................. ; ............ :.Z:::.:..::..: ............. ~ ................... .". .... ........... H.,L-: ...................... , ......................................... : .::.._Z::: ::2..:'..-."~::72: ::::7:: 2'. ................................... : ........................ ~... :.. ........................ 1'"' ................................................. ~t~. ............................... ..': ...... .I'::::: [:::::: ............................ ~-~-..[..--.~--~ ...................... :' ............. ," ........... ....................... · l-"r'~ ......................................... >"~ ................................ , ......... L ~ ....... : ............................................ t ................... -"," ::::::::::::::::::: ::: ::::::::::::: .............. . ................................... : ........................................................ : ........................................... :: :::::':" .: ....... : ¥' .................... i ................ - ................................. _':' :.'-"-':2:: :::_.:-_.'.--._:.-.:: :::Z:.: ::::::::::::::::::::: ........ L:: ..:~::,,...::,:,... ............ ,~.,?.oo i: ....................... ~ ................... .::f' ":': .-': ...-...:;:::::::itt."//i: ':".:.~.'.:~ :...:.:i~ :::..-_..-:.:::::~ :::::::::::::::::::::: ...... ................ :~o ...................... - ,., .............. ~..rT..Us.--.-4' .................................. ,~ , ~ .~ o ........................................... - ............ ....... ~ .............. o · -.~ .... . ~ . '.. ...... · .... · .... · ........................................................................... -.-. ......................... '~0 ......... ~" . · . .... :~ · · - · .......................................... ~ ............... '~"~" m ~ ~3 ~ ~- r ....... m ................. ....... e"Z..o 3.:~. ~ ~ ' ~ .......... ~ ....................... ~ ....... -...--~,..1~ .................. ........ ~"':~ ...... ~" ":.9 ........ '~ ................ e~ ....................... ~1~' ......................... ~,_ .............. ~: ....... ........... ~.'~ ..................................... ...... .... ,.,..~ ..................... x.. ................................................................................................................ ~ le .................. ~..' u~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ..4. COMMON 0 rtl -..I 0 Z fl, ~.- BILLS- OCTOBER 14, 1986 Batch Batch 864094 .... Computer 864095 .... Computer Run dated 10/4/86 Run dated 10/10/86 15,893.72 59,027.63 74,921.35 Unimin Corp ..... sand Boyum Equip ..... hose Contel Tele Serv---Servlce Call 56.56 738.14 55.74 Total Bills 75,771.79 LU i-- Z 0 b"l-- ~-LLI "~'Z Z-J ZZ O0 ZZ -t-~ O0 UJUJ ,~,. il o o :iii ! -I I- 0 ZZZZZZZZ N W 't- 0 UJLU O0 I/1 I,I1 I/I I, fl i oo I~1 I I il I I'.1 I I ~1 r ZZ ZZ I 0 ZZ Z 0 0 Z hi Z I N N W ..J 0 N N r. h~ I m ~ I II.Q,. # · ti. X Z 0 0 Iff' ,It ~u o ol i~0 a~ g =J o~~oooooo o~ ~oooooo I I I I I I I I I I,I I o~~oooooo o~~oooooo o~~oooooo I I I I I I I I I I I t 00000000~000 000000~~ 000000000000 000000000~00 o~ ~1 I oo ~.! I III I I I I 0 0 I- I- ooooooooo~oo ~ 000000000000 W Z 0 I- 0 0 CI Z .i t I I I I .I I · t 7 Z 0 £ i, 0 )- Z ZZZZ 0000 0000 XXXX 0000 0000 I Z .I 0 0 0 LU ~- Z 0 .J 0 I- N I 7' ! N t- 0 I- ¢ £ 0 Z 0 0 0 Z, UJ .J oo ~0 o~ o 't- lU I '1 I O0 O0 O0 gJ 0 LU O ,J o 0 I- I ~J I- X UJ 0 Z co I- Ltl h I Y PIlO o o 00000 00000 00000 00000 ZZ~ZZ LU U~ (C oo oo Io CO I o 7 EXHIBIT "B" · r' L-. iI le · . I .e q ~ : '.,i~ -. ! ~ ~ '. I I I I L. ,~ C~h q q.. ,--, 0 0 ~.-e II a 0'0" OI.C~ 0 °~ o~ 0 ~1 .C II II Oq- '1 XX m+.C W' ~ :3 CC 0 0 I II 4~ II ,-~ UI.,C 0.,-~ · ..., L. 0 o $ L. LEN HARRELL / Chief of Police ./ ~ TO: . Ed Shukle, City ~ FROM. Bill Hudson, Ag~J~ .... SUBJECT: Monthly Report ~~ember, 1986 MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 I. Statistics The police department received 745 calls for service in the month of September. Of those 745 calls, 29 were part I offenses and 76 were Part II offenses. ~ .... The Part I offenses included 1 criminal sexual conduct, 4 burglaries, 20 larcenies. 3 vehicle thefts, and 1 arson. The part II offenses included 1 child abuse/neglect case, 2 forgery/NSF check cases, 21 criminal damage to propertY cases, 1 narcotic case, 8 DWI's, 2 simple assaults, 14 domestic assaults, 11 harassing phone call cases, 5 runaway/incorrigibility cases, disturbing the peace cases and 3 all other offenses. There were 9 accidents (1 with injuries), 15 medicals, 137 animal complaints, and 15 mutual aid calls. The patrol division issued 289 adUlt citations which included 30 parking citations, 39 juveniles received Citations. There were 187 warnings issued. Adult arrests for the month of September include 2 for larceny, 1 for vehicle theft, 8 DWI's, 1 for domestic assault, and 2 for disturbing the peace. Juvenile arrests for the month of September included 5 for larceny, 9 for property damage, 2 for narcotics, and 1 for liquor laws. II. Investigations Cases investigated for the month of September were 1 child/abuse case, 4 burglaries, 1 internal investigation, 1 check case and 1 arson. III. Manpower The number of days utilizing patrol officers in plain clothes were increased as was August, due to chief of police out of town and the investigator assuming his duties. 3 officers were used a total of 9 days in plain clothes. 8 3/4 hours were spent on the Officer Friendly program between Grandview Middle School and Shirley Hills Elementary. Police Department Monthly Report for September Page Two A total of 60.7 hours of overtime was utilized of which none was assigned. 96 hours of comp time was used by various hours at various times. 54½ hours of comp was accumulated. The acting chief is responsible for most of the earned comp time. IV. Trainin8 Time Off. Grand, who is the firearms/range officer, spent several hours with the Mound Police Reserve unit. V. Reserves The Mound Police Reserves donated 403 hours to the department in the month September. Most of the time spent by the reserves was with the regular officers as a ride-along. The dance held on September 12, 1986, was a large success and neted the reserve unit approximately $1,500. The reserve unit will be putting in more time now due to school being in and the athletic events. VI. Complaints Sisned 25 formal complaints were issued and signed in September. One for checks, 1 for narcotics, 3 for DWI, 1 for possession of stolen property, 4 for gross DWI, 3 for aggrivated DWI, 1 for drinking in a city park, 4 for driving after revocation, 1 for speeding and giving false information to a police officer, 1 for violation of a motorcycle restriction, 1 for unauthorized use of telephones, 1 for dog at large (5 counts), 2 for driving after suspension, and 1 for fleeing an officer. Month September 19 86-> CITATIONS ADULT or OU I 8 Hore than .10~ BAC 8 Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle 2 Speeding 120 No DL or Expired DL 3 Restriction on DL Improper, Explred,'or NO Plates 34 Illegal Passln9 Stop Sign Violations 9 Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance A Illegal or Unsafe Turn' ---Over the Centerline 11 17 3O Crosswalk 2 Dog Ordinances 3 Derelict Autos His~ellaneous Tags 40 TOTALS t 289 WARNINGS Nolnsurance JUV 4- 14 3 1 3 3 11 39 39 1 Traffic 47 3 .Equipment 70 7 Crosswalk Animals 6 Trash/Derelict Autos 9 Other 5 TOTAL ARRESTS Felony 1 Hisdemeanor 11 1 PART I CRIMES o ~ ~ ~ o Homicide Criminal Sexual Conduct 1 1 ' Robbery Assault Bur~3~y 4 4 !~ceny 20 20 4 2 5 Yeh~cleTheft 3 3 1 1 Arson 1 1 , TOTAL 29 29 5 3 5 PART IICRIMI~ Child Abuse/Neglect 1 1 1 For~ery~NSFChecks 2 2 Cr~nal D~m~e to Property 21 21 3 9 9 WeapOns " ,, Narcotic Laws 1 I i 2 Liquor Y~ws 1 1 1 1 DWI 8 8 8 8 Simple Assault. 2, 2 2 Domestic Assault " 4 4 2 1 1 Domestics (No Assault) 10 .10 Harassing Phone Cslls 11 11 2 Runaway/Incorrigibility .5 5 5 Public Peace 7 7 4 4 2 3 Ail Other Offenses 3 1 2 1 TOTAL 76 i 75 20 24 tl 15 PART III & IV REPORTS Property Damage Accidents ..... 8 8 · Personal Injury ~ccidents 1 1 Fatal Accidents 0 0 Medicals 15 15 Animal Complaints 137 137 Mutual Aid 15 15 Other General Investigations 465 465 j TOTAL 641 641 ~O~ 745 1 744 20 29 14 20 TOTAL ACTIVITIES t kPi;RTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMHARY Bikes Snowmobiles ITEH STOLEN $ 260 RECOVERED $ 99 Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. Jewelry & Precious Hetals GunS Home Furnishings Radio & Electronic Equipment Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment Hiscel laneous TOTAL 7O 273 1,349 3,596 2,168 2,500 316 $7,716 $2,915 MONTH LICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT SEPTEMBER ~ YEAR 1986 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY · THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR MONTH TO DATE TO DATE g~=ardous Citations 189 1~189 887 Non-Hazardous Citations 84 493 702 g~ardous Warnings 46 396 305 Non-Hazardou~ WarninRs 98 881 859 Parkin~ Citations 30 555 775 DWI 8 110 65 OVER .10 8 81 44 'Property D~m~e Accidents 8 60 84 Personal Injury Accidents 1-- 24 32 Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 4 40 20 - Adult Felony Arrests , Adult'Misdemean~r Arrests 22 ~7~ '336 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 6 78 -- Juvenile Felony Arrests 5 44 49 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 16 128 87 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations· 3 46 -- Part I Offenses 29 292 276 Part II Offenses 69 678 487 Medicals 15 129 203 Animal Complaints 137 958 995 Other General Investigations 465 3,929 5,074 TOTAL 1,243 10,487 11.28'0-----.-_ Assists 58 629 -- Follow-Ups 51 410 , -- LEN HARRELL Chief of Police Bob Brown ECO 6 MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 MOUND POLICE REsERvEs MONTHLY HOURS SEPT. 1986 20 MTG TOTAL 26 Butch Hawks 2% 2 2 Dan Niccum ~t. Cyr 10 59% 13~ 21 Deb Thompson 7% 7% 8 - 18 16½ 2 ......... 16 ............ 7% 3 21..~ 16% 25 2 109 62 9o% Ruth Vogel 2 52 - 3 - 11 n/a 2 7O Connie Stahlbusch In .Training TOTALS 20% 36 148% 5 ECO- Emergency Call Outs 5 Transports RS- Reserve Squads RA- P~de Along w/ Regular Officer IN- Instruction Of New Member TR- Training of New Member ~irearms Training for Comp. Shoot CS- Community Service Details 8th Grade Dance Jr. High Dance at Con~n. Ctr. 3 Home F',~tball Games AD- Administ- -ive 18% 96% 51% 35 2 10 ~03 Submitted by Deb Thompson, Sgt. LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 5449511 EMERGENCY 911 I~OUND POLICE RESERVES SEVERANCE SEPT. 1986 Total Bob Brown Butch Hawks Dan Niccum Dave St. Cyr Deb Thompson Ruth Vogel 25.00 10.00 25.00 15.00 \ 47.50 161.50 45.00 55.00 168.00 197.50 Totals 75.00 674.50 Debbie Thompson, Sgt. Y, ONTH OF '": EHERGENCY EHEAGENCY 5HORE~OOD - FI RE EHERGEN~Y TOTAL. EHEEGENC~ CALLS CO~ERC lag RESIDENTIAL ~ ~ ~ V~ INDUSTRIAL / EMERGE'NCY EM~RGENC.Y TOTAL TOTAL DRILL HOURS /~ TOTAL FIRE HOURS TOTAL E~ERGENCY HOORS ' HUTUAL AID aECEmVED ~ ~ 0 ' Mound, M~nneso~&:V .... ~;':~" ~ REPORT 's FOR MOFiI{ OF ~'-~W*;' '~F./ i DRILLS & t.'~INTENANCE , FIE & KESCU~ DiF2; DATE DATE DRILLS DRILL MAIN. TOTAL HOURLY ,, . l~'-/5--G-R~ WAGES WAGES EOURS RATE WAGES Henderson ~ / ~ /f. ~ / /~ 6.00' g4 -- Kleeberger ~ / ~ /~ ~ /~ 6.00 ~0--,, , ~m ~ ~ / ~ /g.~ f . ~/ 6.°o /~ -- Pederson v / ~ /~. ~I 2 [ ~ 6.00 /2~ D R I L L R E P O R T Disclpllne and Team Work Critique of Fires pr¢-Plannlng &-Inspect;oas T'ools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operat;on Wearing Project'ye Films First Aid and ResCue OperatTon Use of Self-Conta~ned Masks Pumper Oper~t;oo Fire Streams & FrTct;on Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane g~s,Talk & De~onstratlons Laclder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutlons Nozzle & Hose Alliance Inhalator Operation .. NOTE: MouYs Training Paid X Excused X UnexcusJd 0 Present, Not Paid M D~/~ T. Stallman ~ )/~%-D. Boyd '~/J-O. Bryce S. Bryce D. Carlson Andersen _~)I/j..M. David ~)~;/~t~. Nafus Anderson "~i/.F~ B. Erickson ~ M. Nelson ~ I/.~_T. Babb ~ S. Ericks0n ~1/~_ A. Opitz (~ W. Beauchamp D'/j~.J. Garvais o'~'~ B. Palm ~'/~L.M. =~..C. Henderson ~__~M. Palm ~¥~,T. ~L~/.I_G. Johnson ~'/,)_ G. Pederson . '.. ~'/,~_M. KlJeberger 2¥~L.D. Platzer ~¥_~,B. Landsman ~I/j_T. Rasmussen Collins ~I..R. Marschke ~M. Savage Swenson Swenson Tobey Wi 11 i ams Williams /' MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT Mound, Minnesota 55364 DRILL REPORT_ Discipllne and Team gork Critique of Fires Pre-Plannlng S.lnspectlons .~ools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothlng F|Ims First Aid and ResCue Operation Uge of Self-Contained Masks Time Pumper Oper~tlon Fi re Streams ~, Frlctlon Loss House Burnings'' Natural & Propane (;as Talk & Demonstrations Ladder Evolutlons Salvage Operations Radio Operatlons House Evolutions Hozzle & Hose Alliance Inhalator Operation NOTE: HouYs Tralnlng Paid X Excused X_ Unexcused ~0 Present, Not Paid ~ l~l-,J. Andersen ~l/.1..G. Anderson abb ~J--J. Beauchamp gi%D. Bo~d ~L.(/.)..D. Bryce ~I/A-D. Carlson - Po-G~ (S. Collins ~ ~/~l.~M. David ~ ~/~B..Eri'ckson ~$/~t.S. Erickson ~ V~.. j. Garvais ~I/~L. Heitz ~ ~/a-C. Henderson ~ ~/~ G. Johnson ~/~. K1 ~eberger ~i~- B. Landsman ]~R. Marschke ~~ J. Nafus ~ $/el_M. Nelson ]~ A. Opitz ~ B. Palm G. Palm ~/,~ M. Palm G. Pederson D. Platzer ~ ~/~L.T. Rasmussen _~. Savage Drillmaster ~)i/~L.T. Stallman _~.~T. Swenson ~__W. Swenson p'/3-M. Tobey ;D~J'j..R. W~lliams 3_/zJ. illiams MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL ~A~NTENA~C~. FOR ~P~m~6~- F~ MEN ON DUTY J. Anderson G. Anderson J. Babb J. Beauchamp D. Boyd D. Bryce S. Bryce D. Carlson P. Charles S. Collins M. David S. Erickson J. Garvais L. Heitz C. Henderson J. Henke T. ~ngram G. Johnson B. Landsman R. Marschke J. Nafus M. Nelson A. Opitz B. Palm G. Palm M. Palm G. Pederson D. Platzer T. Rasmussen C. Rezba M. Savage T. Stallman W. Swenson r. Swenson M. Tobey R. Williams T. Williams TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS October 8, 1986 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: SUB J' ECT: Ed Shukle, City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk September Monthly Report There were two Council Meetings in September, which means agenda preparation, packets, minutes, resolutions and follow-up items from each meeting. The Primary Election was September 9, 1986. Before that election there are a lot of last minute details that need to be dealt with. A training session for the election judges was held. A public accuracy test of the election counting equipment was done. To do this test 150 ballot cards from each precinct must be punched so that it appears there were different situations in voting, i.e. undervotes, overvotes, blank ballots, etc. This all takes time and there has to be a master sheet for each precinct showing what the count should be to compare with the machine count. In any election the forms from Hennepin County arrive on the Friday before the election. These forms are then disseminated to the various supplies:of' each precinct. We are open for absentee voting on the Saturday before any election from 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. and are open until 7:00 P.M. on the Monday before any election for absentee voting. The Monday before the Tuesday election is when each precinct must be set-up (all voting booths and miscellaneous supplies), keys obtained for the various precincts, and the Precinct Chairpeople come to pick up their material. The filings for municipal offices were open from September 9 to September 23. Two persons filed for the Mayoral position and 4 persons filed for the two Council positions. After the filings closed the ballot pages were ordered and the paper ballots for absentee voting. The paper ballots were ready for distribution on October 3, 1986. This is required by State Statute. An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate o~ the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities, Page 2 City Manager October 8, 1986 Since the Primary Election all ballot frames were removed from the machines and are being prepared for the General Election. The proposed 1987 ~udget £igures were inputted into the computer. I calculated and completed the 1987 Fire Contract for the contract cities. The Contracts were then forwarded to those cities. Assessment hearing notices were prepared, the tax books checked- to verify names, addresses, and notices were published and sent to all the parties concerned regarding the following: CBD Parking Maintenance Unpaid Tree Removal Charges Unpaid Clean-Up Changes Delinquent Water & Sewer Chargs Unpaid Capping of Sewer 4ine Sanitary Sewer & Water Extension Boarding Up of Hazardous Structure Charges Unpaid Weed & Grass Cutting Charges Supplemental Assessments Resolutions were prepared for all the above assessments~ There were the usual calls from residents with questions and problems to handle. fc CITY of MOUND October 9, 1986 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55.364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE AND CITY COUNCIL JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTOR~~ SEPTEMBER PARKS DEPARTMENT REPORT GENERAL COMMENT The Parks Department is now at two personnel on hand, John Taffe and myself. At this time we are currently putting away equipment used this summer and preparing the equipment to be used this winter. John will be leaving in approximately two weeks and will return again next spring. TREE REMOVAL We have done trimming of the area west of the Depot building at Mound Bay Park. The shade from the trees did not allow the cedar roof to dry. Thus, moss grew on the shakes and the dampness caused this area to need reroofing. Tree removals are down, complaints have not come in this month as they have in past months. We may see a balance left in the budget for removals it this keeps up. RIP RAPPING With the monies coming available for rip rapping in 1987, a Master Plan will be set up to show which areas will be rip rapped over the next four years. For 1987, we intend to contract out the following: 1. South Avocet, Bluebird, Canary 2. Cardinal north The City crew will do: 275 feet 170 feet 1. Woodland Point south 60 feet 2. Beachslde, south 20 feet 3. Eagle, south 120 feet 4. Centerview 210 feet 5. Inwood 25 feet 6. Norwood 30 feet An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. September Parks Department Report October 9, 1986 Page 2 CEMETERY With the budgeted monies for tree trimming at the cemetery, this area will be in excellent shape for 1987. The storage building is completed and enhances the area. PARKS With school back in session, we have seen the vandalism problem dropped. Over the summer, we had numerous picnic tables abused and the Depot building got a good amount of graffito. All recreation equipment will be checked for wear and safety. Repairs will be done next spring before use begins. The tennis court will have their nets removed and the doors locked. Kids have used these courts, when the nets are down, to ride their bikes. The damage comes from skidding their tires on the court surface, which is painted. DOCKS The rip rapping of Ashlund, Surfside, Beachside and Wiota Commons (south Eagle) has been completed by City crew. JF:is TO: CitylManager and Members of the City Council FROH: Jan Bertrand, Buildlng 0fficial DATE: OCtober 1, 1986 SUBJECT: September Monthly Report During the f'irst weekof September, the Orono Building Inspection Department performed~field.inspections for the City-of Mound. The following inspections were conducted by myself during 'the remainder of September~ 5ire inspections include the review of Planning'Commission requests and require- ments~:complai-nts and fol'l°W-ups t°. code compliance such as, no building'permits, recheck of compliance notices, review status of various sites for the City Prose- cutor, also included, are preconstruction meetings with building permit appli= cants or realtors, fire damage and periodic commercial inspection updates. Site inspections ._ Footlng inspectl.ons lngulati0n. InspectiOns 2 Framing inspections 11 Drywall inspections Final inspections 12 Progress inspections 5 Erosion/Grading Heating inspections 3 Plumbing inspections Fire sprinklers Complaints Total 95 Plan review was completed on 12 building permit applications, Two meetings were conducted with the architect and sprinkler company for the Toro addition to the Balboa.facility, Subdivision/plat on Commerce Boulevard required a meeting with the City Engineer and City Planner.and myself before application is made to the Planning Commission, ! attended the quarterly Minnegasco Heating Inspectors~ Meeting in Bloomington. ! met with the City Manager to discuss the progress to do repairs on the City Ha11Is skylights for the W. J. White Company. Scheduling of the skylight repairs were done in mid-September. I received two apartment complex complaints during September for 2009 Commerce Boulevard and'2631 Commerce Boulevard. These com- plaints resulted in researching of property owners~,correspondence and code compliance reports to be issued on. one of the complexes with the other one pending an inspection in mid-October. Significant time was spent at various meetings during September. The regular Board of Appeals meeting for the Planning Commission handled several cases September Honthly Report October ), 1986 - Page 2 at the September 8th meeting with the.September 22nd meeting cancelled for lack of t~aining items. I attended two City Council meetings on the 16th and 30th of September, a staff meeting was held on the afternoon of the 9th with Depart- ment meetings following to disseminatethe information to the co-workers..Harge and I attended a LOGIS.afternoon meeting, in Brooklyn Center. LOGIS met with various commun|t|es tb. dlscuss the recent development of their build|ng inspec- tion management program.~ The programm|.ng involved issuing building permits, computerizing applications, recordi'ng.necessary'planning information on prop- erties, with various work processing capabi.'iities. The estimated cost Of the program and a disCusslonwith the Finance Department fo)loved our meeting at LOGIS. Various inquiries were hand)ed by. our.Department pertaining to zoning, code requ|rements,..permit procedures, etc.. One easement'Vacation, one ~ubdivi. Sion.of land.and variance and t~o..variance. requests were handled and referred from the Planning Commission. The~t°tal number of Building Permits issued'in.September Was q5 with a valua- tion of $1,673,880. A copy of the 8ui'lding'-Activity Report is attached. In addition, our Department prepared the'monthl.y-calendar for OCtober City meetings and events;.hand]ed t'he purchase of 5'.cemetery graves and arranged to have the Public Works stake out.two.grave sltes for burials as well as several graves staked out for markers '(monuments) and discussed with HcCombs Knutson updating the cemetery map. JB/ms CITY OF MOUND $341 Haywood Road, Street Address Hound, HN. 55364 CItyand Stste .' . ' .. . BUILDING A~VI~ REPO~ '*' M~t~N September. ~, 64 ,. N~ RESIDENTIAl. ' .~ ~' "~~ ' 7 7 535.335 ~om ~.~:e u~, 7 ' 7 535,335. 32 2,207,3aq. N~ RESlDE~I~ T~I N~FI~ (~mmercla~l~ ! RESIDENT~L ADDITI~N~ N~ ~ I ~ 'AND ALTEAAT~NS ' ~ ~ ! I~ L~ 15, N20 65 233,1 ?ot.~ a.~en~t 25 ~ 126, I ~5. 139 878, q76. ~O~RESIOENTIAL ADD~ ~ TION~ & ALTE~TION~ ~l ~ml m~ ~.~ 2 ~; 1,007,0OO. 6 1,117~500. t ~,~ .... ? ~ a ann ~ .'' ( w 1 ~ 1 ,'ooo. 1,000. Tot,l,e~Re,~,nfl~ 5 ~ 1,012,~00. 1~ ! ,312,500. ~OTAL MOtH AND ~ Y~RTODATE - 37 1 ;673,880. ,~ 6,888,320. ~ ~'" ~. ~.,. DEMOLmONS NM ~ ~a~ll I~ ~l WI ReM ~. ~,,~,,~ I I 7 / ~ 8 T~Ill Dem~t~l ~ 1 PERMIT~ INSPE~ION~ H& P.~. N& ~i ~ ~ ~EES COLLECTION$ 1~ ~a Ye~ ~ ~ ~ ~m ~u zu~ Fgqce/RetainWal 1 ~ 2 20 I .~ ~., T~ = .. .... . ...... - ' :~"~' ':~'~ Business Shore1 Center sota · Telephone No. · q72-.1155 Jan Bertrand,'Building OfflcSal September 1986 SHOP MAINTENANCE RECORD The following is a record of work to City vehicles by the mechanic. STREET DEPT. Unit #! - replaced rear springs, install rear brakes shoes, turn drums, install new master cylinder. Unit #13 - Install new vacum booster Old Sweeper - change oii and filter WATER DEPT. Unit #3 - changed oil, filter and lubed Unit #11 - changed oil, bilter and lubed. SEWER DEPT. Unit #9 - changed oil, filter and lubed, replaced starter motor. POLICE DEPT. #840 - changed oil, filter and lubed #841 - changed oil, filter, air filter and installed 2 new tires. #842 - changed oil, filter and lubed, removed rock from front rotor. #843 - changed oil, filter, air filter, upper radiator hose, alternator belt, spark plugs, air conditioning belt, cleaned and checked battery cables, replaced cable ends, silicone right front door, added anti-freeze, replaced and balanced rear tires #844 - changed oil, filter and lubed, checked leak in power steering. #845 - installed new battery #846 - changed oil, , filter, air filter, cleaned carburetor, reinstalled fan belt. CITY of MOUND October 9, 1986 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR RE: SEPTEMBER 1986 FINANCE REPORT BUDGET The 1987 Budget was approved at budget meetings held in September. A question was asked by Councilmember Peterson regarding a breakdown of dollar increases in the 1987 General Fund budget. The following is a breakdown of summary of expenditures (taken from page 17 of the budget): General Fund Expenditures 1986 1987 Increase Department Line-item budgets $1,7-~,368 $1,8~,900 124,532 Transfers and Contingencies 125,741 206,820 81,O79 Total $1,868,109 $2,073,720 205,611 Breakdown of increases - A. Department Line-item budgets 1. Capital Outlay increase from 1986 2. Insurance increase from 1986 3. All other increases in line-items Total $124,532 '' 76,930 38,4OO 9,202 $124,532 Transfers and Contingenci'es 1. Increase in City of Mounds share of Fire Contract $81,O79 $41,459 There are three main reasons for the increase for fire contract. First of all, the calls for service have increased which increases the cost of operating the fire department. Second, insurance cost have also increased in the fire fund. Finally, a rescue vehicle with a cost of $40,O00 is to be purchased next year, Mound's share of the vehicle is $20,940. Transfer to Sealcoat Fund (½ of total cost) $26,000 In prior years the transfer to Sealcoat Fund was taken from Liquor profits. For 1987, the liquor fund profits are projected to cover ½ of the sealcoat costs. Therefore, the general fund must pick up the other ½ of the sealcoat project costs. An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or ernployment in, its programs and activities. September 1986 Finance Department Report October 9, 1986 Page 2 Increases in Contingency fund Total $13,620 $81,079 REVENUE SHARING We have received our final payment for 1986 Revenue Sharing. The following is a recap of revenue sharing at the end of September 1986: Balance Revenues: Jan April July September 1-1-86 $1,184 $12,405 12,405 10,794 7,880 $43,484 Expenditures Civil Defense (siren) (3,612) Streets (½ of dump truck) (28,737) ($32,,349) Balance 9-30-86 , $12,319 A quote has been received on the depot upgrading budgeted for this year. cost of the roof repair on the depot building'is estimated at $10,200. Afterthe 1986 revenue sharing money i's spent, there will be no more revenue sharing 'in the future. The I N~ESTMENTS The following is September investment activity: Balance Bought: CP 5.5 BA 5,5 CP 5.55 CD 5.90 Matured: FNMA 8.42 BA 6,70 BA 6~715 CD 6.75 Balance 9-30-86 $7,069,122 Due 3-1')-87 Daln Bosworth 349,892 Due 3-9-87 American National 194,561 Due 1-2-87 Dain Bosworth 200,478 Due 2-13-87 Marquette 130,000 Dain Bosworth American National American National Marquette (300,210) (196,184) (260,108) ( oo,ooo) $7,087,551 September 1986 Finance Department Report October 9, 1986 Page 3 Breakdown of Balance: US Gov't Securities Commerical Paper Certificates of Deposit Bankers Acceptance Gov't Trust Pool Repurchase Agreement Total $3,645,308 1,390,347 1,250,000 366,896 335,000 100,000 $7,87,551 COMMERCE SQUARE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT Balance 9-1-86 ' September interest Greg Carlson Relocation Lynwood Boulevard - HRA expense Reimburse City expenses - includes demolition of grocery and laundry $377,475 1,825 (10,o00) (57,835) (27,110) Balance 9-30-86 $284,355 PROBATION PERIOD I passed my probation period of one year on September 16th. The year went by fast and I found the work to be challenging. I am thankful for the good work done throughout the year by the Finance Department Staff. Their experience and abilities helped to make my transition from the auditing profession to finance director go smoothly. I look forward to more good years in the future. JN:ls CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155' October 9, 1986 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Geno Hoff Street Supt. September's Monthly Activity Report The street Dept. didn't get a lot of repair work done on the streets this month because of the weather. We did finish the manhole and gate valve repairs. Also the Water Dept. had a water main break on Co. Rd. llO and two water taps which we blacktopped. We bought 50 ton of blacktop and 222 tons of sandfill in September. We had the vac-all out for ten days and cleaned 29 sump catch basins. A sump catch basin is a structure that traps the debris from a storm sewer before it gets to an open ditch or a lake. When the weather was bad the Street crew worked in the shop. Tim and Greg had to rebuild the dumpbody on Unit #15, that's a 1975 2~ ton dumptruck. They put a new bottom in the dumpbox and rebuilt the tail- gate. We sandblasted three dumptruck boxes and painted them, also Unit #13 was completely reworked and painted. (looks like new) SIGN DEPARTMENT We put up 5 No parking signs on Bartlett Blvd. and repaired the guard- rail on Brighton Blvd. and Co. Rd. 125. An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 9, 1986 TO: Ed Shukle FROM: Greg ~kinner Water & Sewer Supto SUBJECT: September's Monthly Activity Report WATER DEPARTMENT In September we pumped 19,897,O00 gallons of water. There were 5 new accounts for September. Joyce and myself attended the AWWA Convention in St. Cloud. There were 15 outside readers installed, 33 final readings and 9 meter-outside reader repairs. We will be sending out meter cards to the customers for the next 3 months to have them read their inside meter. This will enable us to check and see if the inside meter and outside reader are reading the same. SEWER DEPARTMENT We had i complaint of sewer backing up into a house at 4544 Dorchester. Damon answered the call and found it to be plugged in the residents line. We will be cleaning 29 sewer wet wells and filters in October. This takes approximately 2 weeks. in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in. its programs and activities. CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October .1, 1986 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER SEPTEMBER 1986 REPORT Sales for the month of September were $63,467.00. Down considerably from last year because of two important factors: the wet weather, and last year people were stockpiling their liquor supplies because the Federal Excise Tax rose sharply on distilled spirits, October 1st of 1985. Liquor alone this month was down 27% from September of last year. For the first time ever we were open on Labor Day. Sales were not as good as Memorial Day's sales. However, sales were what they normally would be for a Monday. We really didn't have an option as to whether to be open or closed. The other private stores in the area were open so we were unfortunatel, y forced into it. With summer over you can noticeably see a sharp drop in the sales of beer and wine coolers. Now that the colder season is here, wines, cordials, liqueurs and spirits pick up considerably. White goods such as vodkas, gins, rums and tequilas slow down, but other packages like canadians, scotches, brandies and flavored schnapps start selling strong. Now that the third financial quarter has ended, I plan on meeting with John Norman to discuss with. him where we stand to date this year in terms of gross and net profits. We should be able to determine with this information what the bottom line will 6e at the end of the year, barring any unforeseen catastrophies. JK:ls in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. CITY 'OF MOUND 1,]OUND ~ tf~-NI'~F_.,S OT A MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT OF LIQUOR 'DEPART~E~T, '" ~S ' '. THIS'MONTH: :I~qST MgNTH' ' THIS YEAR." ' Compsx-isoa of, H~not'~LY Sa~e's . · Month'.· I LAST. YEAR MOUND The MOUND Municipal Liquor Store had sales o£ $797,175 with a cost of goods sold totaling 8601,748, leaving a gross profit o£ $195,427 or 24.51 percent o£ sales. The operating expenses were $134,289, so the liquor store had an operating income of 861,138 . The non-operating revenue, which includes interest earnings, amounted to 86,196 and the non-operating expenses totaled $?52, leaving a net income of $66,582 . Below is a comparison of the MOUND Municipal Liquor Store to all the city liquor stores in the state. AS Sales Cost of Sales Gross Profit Operating Expenses Operating Income Non-operating Revenue Non-operating Expenses · Net Income A PERCENT OF SALES City State OFF SALE ONLY Off Sale Only On & Off Sale All Stores 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 75.49 77.87 61.85 69.46 24.51 22.13 38.15 30.54 16.85 16.88 33.99 25.87 7.67 5.25 4.16 4.68 0.78 1.57 3.42 2.54 0.09 0.26 0.63 0.45 8.35 6.55 6.95 6.76 Transfers Out (In) 6.25 7.66 5.98 6.78 ARNE H. CARLSON STATE AUDITOR SUITE 400, 555 PARK STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55103 For Further Information: (612) 296-2551 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 6, 1986 STATE AUDITOR ARNE CARLSON NOTES PROFIT MARGINS DOWN IN 1985 FOR MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORES IN MINNESOTA State Auditor Arne Carlson today said that city liquor profit margins decreased in 1985 while sales remained constant. · Liquor store income continues to be squeezed by competitive market forces," Carlson said. "With profitability declining, cities are increasingly forced to evaluate liquor store operations." Carlson's report indicates that ~n 325 cities which operated liquor stores, 47 suffered net losses in 1985. Ten cities closed their liquor stores in 1985, and thirteen closed during 1984. In contrast to these cutbacks, 19 stores contributed $100,000 or more to their city's general fund. "The total sales of city liquor stores were $136.3 million in 1985 compared to $136.1 million in 1984, even though 10 stores were closed," Carlson said. "The survivors among these stores will be those that can compete successfully with the private sector," Carlson said. He noted some municipal liquor stores are converting to low-margin "off-sale" only operations. They are dropping the "on-sale" or liquor-by-the-drink operation, which has higher operating costs. The 10 stores closed in 1985 and 13 stores in 1984 were primarily on-sale operations. Operating expense continued to rise, to 25.9 percent of sales in 1985 as compared to 25.8 percent in 1984. Net income for all stores totaled $9.2 million, down Sl.02 million from a year earlier, and down from $13.9 million in 1981. Contributions of net income to governmental funds totaled $9.2 million, as compared to $9.1 million a year earlier. One-hundred-two stores made no contributions to ~ther municipal funds in 1985, and seven of those required contributions from governmental funds. According to a 1981 law, liquor stores having a net loss in any two of three consecutive years, or any liquor store not making a contribution to the city in any two of three consecutive years, must hold a public hear- ing to decide whether the city shall continue to operate a municipal liquor store. Editor's Note: A copy of the Analysis of Municipal Liquor Store Operations for 1985 is available from our office at the above telephone number. [Over] ma33 Sales of City Liquor Stores $146 WILLIOIS $14Z $134 I I I Net Income of City Liquor Stores (as a percent of sales) ::::::::::::::::::::: .:,:,,,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,; :*:*:*:*:.:,:.:,:,:. ,,,,,, ...... ********************* ********************* ,.:.:,:,:.:,:,:,:.:.:.: ::::::::::::::::::::: ********************* ,*,',***,*,*,*,*,:,: *,*,,,,,,~,,,,,*,*,. , ..... , ..... ,,,,, ...... ,:,:.:.:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:. *:*:*:.:*:,:*,*:*:.:* ,,,~,,~,,,,,,,,,,,, ::::::::::::::::::::::: I I I I I,I. ~ez~e~t 4,0- i,l- J~13~ - a~ nor, -- n'T ~o;-nag F0~- POK- CGST OF KT Of .... M~ITIK ...... LI~IITIIG --- IIC~ ~ ~,3~ 1,~,41~ I, iM,~ ~,~ ~.~ 2~,1~ ~,~ 17,~ 1,311 ~,~ ~,~1 K,~ ~ ~,410 ~.~ ~.~ M.~ M,~ -1,~ U.~ II,X0 1,~1,~ 1,14l,~ ~,~ 24.~ ' ~,~ i?,~? ~,~ M0 ~4,1J5 ~S,240 N,W M.~ 67,W ~,~ .... ~ XI,?~ ~,!~ ~,~ ~.4] 1~,~11 P,~ 1,~ 4,1~ ~,2~ ~,~ ~4,~ ~.S1 ~,31~ ~,~1 l,~ ~ 1~,~ 113,?~ ~,~ ~.I? M,~ 11,~ S,~ 121 4,~ ~7,~ ~,~21 2M,M7 ~.F ~,~ ~,~ II,M ~ 1~,2~ 110,~ ~,017 ~.13 ~,~ i,~ ~1~ 1,~ ~,?~ ~,~1 ~,~ ~.M 1~,~ ~,~1 2,1~ 247 ~,M$ 14J.MS 1~,~ ~.~ ~.~ ~,IM 2,~ ~,~ ~7,~4 l~,~{ ~.~ N,MI ~.~l 11,~ Ill ~7 ........................ 4,~ 2,~ ~,i17 ~.~ 1~,~ ~.~ ~,~3 1,~ 1,~ fl3 ~3,~ 1~,~ ll0,~ ~.M l~ ?,~ Z,~ [12 1,WI 42,X0 n,lP 11,~ ~.M 13,101 *Z, IM 1,~ ~ ~,~ 141,67i 1~,i14 ~.~ M,~I ~,~ 2,~ 741 ~3,~9 l~,~l ~,W U.~ ~,~ U,1SI .... [01 1~ ~,IM 61,G iS,055 SI.~ SS,W t,W .... IS, M0 2,931.417 2.~.0~ ~,M3 1~ 14J.~ ~.~6 ~,~ ~.S1 67,~ 3,~ .... ~ ~1,~ ~S,~ M,I~ ~.Sl ~,S14 ~,S~ 1,~ III ~ ~,~ ~,~l l,~ ~.~ ~,~4 -~,~ 2,~ {GA AI,TIS ~:~: ll~ F~ BIG ~ Bl~r SI~AT ~ F~ ~:i DAV$O~ D~VAN .... 4~ 25,600 .... 2.763 .... 4,2{0 S2,070 .... 32,4~5 .... 2,210 24 43,371 3.163 IM,M'/ 100,000 ***~ -4.~ .... .... 31,M1 .... .... -3,142 #,75! .... 43,0~3 24 J,{91 .... .... -4,1# .... 2,21& .... 16,430 .... S,123 ...~. .... -S,331 IS 10,~4 .... 3,322 10,M0 .... 10,110 23,~43 1,0ll 3,273 .... I,?10 121,121 .... .... 14,33~ .... M,130 .... .... 2,t~I .... .... 13,44~ .... I,SS? .... lO,IM 8,200 .... 13,345 15,747 .... S,~3 .... .... 31,700 .... 8,740 8,147 20, ils IS, M0 .... -34 14,190 .... 31,303 33,000 S,01! I,M2 31,3~ .... 16,674 10,000 .... 1&,971 .... 10,433 123,325 103,S00 .... mm,SM 34,313 .... ?,3M 14,143 .... 10,327 10,t24 32,171 .... l,(~3 .... 4,&44 24,213 Sg? 39,{S0 SS,MO .... -tm,&M .... .... 45,553 .... 2,2~ .... .... 4,2M .... S0,406 6,NI -4,4O{ ?,S~0 .... 22,712 .... 10,fTS 11,433 SM -1,3~5 .... .... 23,2~0 20,00~ .... -146 6,700 .... 13,131 .... .... -5,336 S,0&2 214,329 482,727 S, IS4 .... 6,032 15,M7 .... 13,001 .... S,3~ 24;161 10,M0 .... :30& .... &,4~0 3,M2 .... 3,~S - .... .... 1~,~$! It& 12,1# 'I0,00Q .... 1~,21! .... -24,44& 17,&10 14,000 31,M3 3'7,M2 .... 4,405 .... 2,336 .... 1,~3& 130,312 ~0,000 ~A · II[~ ~A~ i~i~ ~ ~ ~I~I~ al & 0}? S&T,Z M0 m'}' ~ 0E.! 24,052 ~ ~ 0lC! 44,4M0 GIT ~ OIL! 7,#5 01 i 0FF SA:.E 4;0 orr ~ or..! OFF ~ 01~! M & OFF ~ 1,3JS 0IT S&2 al~ II,MS M & 0fF SA:.t 221 QII & o~r .~:I 151 01 6 OFF ~ 1,S74 0il & 0FF Sll~ 322 al i OFT Sl~ ell & ORr ~ aJ & fi7 S&I.E 4,4M MI & MT rdl~ 330 CI & 0~T SA/,~ 147 QII l C~Lr MI, Z 01 & ~ SALE 1,4~ OI i OIT SL~ MT ~ OlP,! 3,Z74 CI & 0r? SLT,~ el & ol~y sa~E 137 M i ~ ~ IlS ~&~ ~ & ~ ~ 1,11S ~ & ~ ~ I,~ N i ~ ~ 2,10S I~lL!$,'-~ OF Cl~ MOU~ ~ ~:IM - INS - ~ ~IT -- ~ ~/~ ?re,ns ~.m n,~ ~.u n.~: z,~ ~.~ .... ~,m z.~ zmo,m :]o,?3s ri, x3 e.H N,~ ],~ i,~ .... ?.~ zo,m 1,~3,~ 1,~,~ W,MI ~.~ ~4,~ 71,~ 3,~J .... 14,6~ ~,~ S, 1~,~ 4,147,M1 ~,~ 19.~ ~,~ ~,~ &l,~ .... M4,3~ ~,~ ~,~ lJl,~ X,M? X.R ~,~ t,~ J.~ .... ~ ?,G 1~,1~ IM,~ ~,?~ ~.~ ~,~3 2,~1 1,~ .... * 4,~ .... i~,~ l~,l~ M,e7 e.~ 74,~4 S,~ H,~ ~M ~,~ ~,~ l~,~ ~,J~ M,~ M.IS M,M ~,~ R,~ 4,11S 14.17 ~,~ *U,~ ~,~ .... ~,~ I,~ ]J?,~ IU,G ~ ~.~ M,W '~,~ 1,~ ~ '10,~? ~4,~ I~,~ ~,~ M.M 1~,~ ~,~ .... .... ~,~ D,~ ~,M ~,2M ~,~ ~.M I~,~ 17,~ .... S ~7,~ ~?,~ ~,JlJ ~,~1 M,~ M.U U,~ ~ ........ ~ ~,~ ~,~1 ~,~ ~,~ ~.~ M,~ M4 1,~ .... l,Ml ~.~ liJ,~ UI,~ ~.i? ~,KI ~,~ S,I~ .... ~,~ IS,~ 1U,G tM,KS M,~J H.~ II,~ ~ 4,1~ .... 3,~ 13,~ 2,~,~ l,~,l~ U4,~ 14.~ .~,~ ~l,~ ~,~ .... ~,l~ '1,~ ~,~3 ~,G 7,H? ~.~ ~,ID '2,~ .~ ...... '2,~ .... ~,~4 ~,15S 16,tlt ~.~ ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ .... ~,~ ~,G ~,~0 m,~ M,~ ~.M ~',iU '3,~ ........ '3,~ .... ~,1~ ~,~ R,~ M.~ M,~ ~,~ 14,~ 3,~ ~,~ .... ~4,1~ ~,~ 1~,~ ~.~ 1~,~ ~,U1 S,~ 1,~ ~,~ 1~,~ U,5~ ~,~ ~.fl ~,2~ 1,~1 ~ 1,~ S, IM 3,~ ~,~ ~,,l S,~ ~.K ~,~ lhBl ~,~ .... ~,~ ~,~ ~,MI ~,~ ~.ff ~,~ 1~,~ 1~,7# ~,~ U.~ ~,~ 1,~ 1,~ .... ~ 3,~ ~,~ ~,tS3 M,~ ~.~ ~,M S,~ ~4 .... I,~ .... 1~4,~3 M,~ ~,~ O.M M,~I *L~ ~ .... -I,~ ..... IM,~ I~,~ ~,M ~.~ ~,~ I,K? 4,~ .... S,~ ~,~ ~,~ N,IH ~,~ ~.~ ~,~ 3,~ 1,Sl~ .... S,~l ~,~ 116,~ M,~ ~.i? ~,4M ~,~ ~,~ 14,~ '14,W ~,~ ~,IM ~,~1 G,~S ~.U M,SI7 ~,~ M,~ .... ~,]M 1~,~ ~g,~ W, JZS 61,674 ~.11 . ~,ll0 ~.285 1~,~ M.~ I~,~ 7,~ M,I~ 3,10 IS,MI ~,~ ~,ff3 ~,~ ~,~i M.~ ~,~ ~,~ ........ ~,~ ~,~ ~,~1 H,~l i?,~ O.e3 M,~ ~,~ ........ ~,~ ~,~ ~,iM IM,?~ ~,~ M.14 ~,~ 1,~4 ~,1~ 7,~ S,~ ~,~3 ~,~3 1~S,~ ~.~ ~,I~ Jl,~ ~,~ .... T4,~ ~,~ I,IU, IM ~,M ~,~ ~.fl 171,~ IN,N1 6,~ S,ll0 10l,J~ 110,~ ~,~ ~,~1 1~,~ ~.U ~,SIi ~,~ 3,2U .... ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~,N~ IM,~I ~.I? U1,H -2,~ U,~ J,31J I,W 10, G 1~,1~ 112,~ ~,~ ~.M fl,~ ~,~ ........ 10,~ .... ~,IN ~,fll N,~ ~.M ~,~1 14,174 11,~ .... ~,~ G,G ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~.H ~,S 1~,~ 1,~ .... lJ,l~ ~,~ ~,~ ~1,6~ ~,~ ~.M ~,~ M,~ S,~4 3,~ ~,1~ I0,~ ~,~ !~,~ ~,ilS ~.~ ~,~ ~,~ 1,~ .... ~J,~ ~,~ ~,~ e.~ il,~l *~,~ li,~ .... ~ 1,~ ~,~ UI,Mt N,~ ~.~ ~,~ ~ I,~ .... h~ ~,~ ~,~5 IM,~ llh~ ~.~ 1~,~ 11S, 121 SJ,~ ~,~ e.0S ~,~ 2,514 ~ .... 2,~ ~... ~,~ IU,211 1~.14~ ~.M ~,~ ~,l~ S,~ .... ~,~ * .... ~,G ~1,~12 111,~3 ~.~ 1~,~ S,~1 ?,~ .... 13,~ S,~ 105,~0 ~,J21 M, 01J ~.M M,~J 'M 1,1ll .... 1,~ .... ~1,~ ~,1~ 1~,~ ~.~ 11~,1~ ~,,~ ~ .... ~,~1 .... 1~,~ JS,BS ~,023 41.~ ~,~ li.~ 4,~ G ~,~ 140,012 ~6,~ ~,2~ ~2.0~ 2~,1~ IS1,921 ~.~ ~,~ ~,~2 I.~ .... ~,317 .... P~.IC SEltl~ EIT~Pt!SI3 111]~!S25 OF C:TI LI01IQJ S'~eE 0PDITI011 - IlLS Cb'T 0f I~ OF .... 0flIITJIK ...... KIORIITJIIG --- ~ ~ OFF SILE ~l~T 01 i 0~ Sl~ 241 OFF ~ ~ 2,~ ~&~ 1,~ ~ ~ ~ 4,SJ3 M & ~ ~ 49S ~ i ~ ~ 2,~3 M i ~ ~ I,M6 o~ ~ ~l S,~4 ~A~ 1,~ ~&~ I&S,&~ II4.N& 4e,SJ2 24.~, 31,6'71 9,o14 ~.3,201 ~,~7 ~,~ ~.~ M,~ 14,~ 4,~ ~3 19,~ 14,~ ~,4M ~4,118 IM,E ~.Sl ~,~ IS,G · ....... IS,~ ~,~ ~,~1 l~,ll3 M,~ G.D M,S~ ~,~ ......... ~9,~S9 ~,~ I~,~ ~.~ 1~,~ l&,S~ ~,~ .... ~.~ M,~ Xg,~ ~1,~ ~,I~ ~.~ IM,~ ~,~ ........ ~1,~ 167.~ ~11,~ ~.9S K,olS ~,~ .... ...~ i&,~ ~,w l~,ffl N.?~ ~,~ 6.~ ~,~ *~ I,~ .... l~,~ ~l,~ ~,~ ~.~ M,i~ ~ 1~ .... '3,~ 3,~ ~,~3 ]~,~ ~,~ ~.~ ~,~ ~,~0 l?,~ ?,~ ~.~ 1.~ ~l,l?l ~,14l ~,~ ~.~ ~,~ ~,~1 1,~4 .... '7,~ 7,~ ~,Sl3 111,~ UI,NS 4I.U ~,~7 ~,~ ........ ~,~ ~,~ ~.1~ ~,?M 1~,~4 ~.H llJ,~ M,IIO 10,~ .... ~?,~ ~,~ ~,~ M.~ M,~ ~,~ 11,1N .... M,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~.~ ~,010 G.~ 14~,~ M,~ 17,~ W ~,MS K,~ ~,014 Ui,4~ ~,~ ~.H M,?It IO,M 3,;74 .... 14,~ ~,~ ~,~4 114,~ M,~ ~.O ~,~ 3,~4 2,~ .... S, SIO .... ~,~ 1~,~ ~,~ ~.~ N,~ ~,~ ~ .... '~,4~ .... ~,~ ~,~1 ~,1~ ~.~ ~1,~ ~,~1 ~,~ 4,~ 1~,~ .... ~,~ ~,S~ ~,~ ~.~ ~,~ -7,1~ S,~ ~ -2.~ .... ~.121 ~,K IU,~ ].II IK,~ U,~ ~,1~ ~,?~ lJS,~ ~.Sl ~,~ 61,1M i,l~ ~ M,~ ~,~ B,~4 1~,1~ US,IN ~.~ ~,G F, PO ........ F,S~ X,"5 1,~,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~.~ ~,4H ~,~ ~,~ ~,J~ M,~ M.M ~,~ ~,~1 ........ ~,~ .... ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ G.4J ~17,7U 14,~ I,M .... D,~ D,~ ~,7~ ~,~ Sl,~ ~.~ ~,~I 4,~ ........ 4,~ 3,~ 1~,~ ~,~ i?,~ ~.14 SI,M1 ~,G S,~ .... A,~ ~,~ ~,~ Sl,~ ~.~ H,010 ~,~ 3,~ .... -1,3~ 3,~ ~,G 139,110 II3,1N ~.H N,SlJ 14,6~ 4,H3 ~3,~ 1~,7~ 1~,~ ~.~3 I17,~ ~,~4 J,~ 2,1&7 ~,319 ~S,~I 1~,~ 110,1~ ~.~ ~,~ 11,1~ I,~ .... 2i,~ 10,~ ~S,175 1J3,219 ~,JM ~.14 M,~ 2.~ S,~ .... 8,1M .... ~,1~ ~,~ ~,~ e.fl ~,~ 9,741 l,~ .... ll,~l .... ~,SII ~,~4 ~,S17 ~.~ ~,~J 10,1M ~,~ .... X,W X,~ ~,~4 ~S,~ ~0.1H ~.~ 171,~1 ~,flS i,S~ .... ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ 1~,~9 ~.~ IM,~ ~,~ 2,~ 1,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~3,t~ ~,~ e.~ ~,~ M,~ I,~ .... le,~4 ~,~ M,~2 ~.~ ~,0lJ ~ 2,~ .... 3, lK 4,~ ~,0Z0, S~i ~,~ ~,~ X.Si ~,~ ~,~ 7,~ 3,~ ~,5~ ~,~ ~,JU ~,~ ~,0~ ~.~ ~,~ -D,~ 14,~S .... '~ .... ~,~ ]~,~ ~?,~ ~.~ ~,?~0 ~,2~? l~,~ H,GI N,a O.~ 14,M2 ll.~ 2,~ .... 13,~9 .... ~S,~ 1~,~ ~,~ ~.~ M,M9 '11,?~ 3,1~ .... ~,~ -.... M0,057 ~1,~ ~,~1 ~.~ ~,~1 ~ NS .... ~ ,.. ~i,{t 1~,~ ~,~l ~.g ~,l~ 10,~l .... ~ lO,{ ' '{... 5,~,152 4,~3,~4 l,~,~ 20.~ ~,3~ ~,~2 74,~1 4,7~ 412,~ 2~,761 ~,217 ~6,~6 1~,139 31.M 173,135 ~.~ ~,~ 4,~35 40,~ Nil, lC iiIVICl c~ Ct~ Ll0e0e ST~ Ol'~Til - INS ~r ~ olur S03 lO,Mi ID.201 ~0J47 /1.33 IS,NS 4,H2 I,MS .... 6,S27 .... 0l t fit SJ~ 1,322 382,711 2.50,871 131.041 M.4.S 127,1i$ 4,M2 !.76 '1,100 -6o272 .... M & ~'r G{.f I,Sll IM,ll6 1#,3S4 S4,SI4 r/.16 IS,331 -30,742 32? ' 23l -{0,147 .... al 6 MT SILE 413 114,770 64,333 SO,iS? 43.J7 M.IFI ~,~10 4,3J7 .... 6,?Fl .... 01 6 OFF ~ 13 330,733 14J,0M R?,T31 iS.IS ii,LTl' Ii,101 u,T33 .... 4T,837 IS, N0 01 i 0Lrlr SL~ 11! 2,0~ il,F)4 ?,tM 4,140 40.1~ 10,HI -IS, IM SS,2SS l,'Jl6 ~',ffl 01 60~T Git 6,341 ~11,402 S~,k~ ~S4,573 32.37 mini,ill {S,iZS 3,S41 3,1~S ~ ~1 i 0iT iL2 S,il0 iii,S14 4~,N0 410,LM 49.M ~Ji,3~ 14,{33 31,4H .... 'S{,'7'd 01 6 OFT S~ 6N ~d, flS #,~J0 #,~S 4~.N #,i24 l,ti{ ........ {~ili .... M 6 Off ~ 1,211 138,128 1)3,~S IM,N3 #.M IN,fi7 -M .... I'A -~10 0Fir uTI OiLY 4,'~J0 &Si, MI Mi, Ii2 171,~ 19.18 IM,fl2 17,ff7 l,ll! )8,165 QI i fi7 ~ 616 {il,0~S 112,127 ISS,~3{ 44.33 ~II. N7 l&.ffi S,)S4 .... ~,12S 4,MS ~1 i ~T Sl~ ~ B2,1~1 RS,LS0 Mt,MI M.19 fi,MS IT,MI 6,~7 .... lS,4~ 32,M0 QI 6 ~r ~ 1,31S 114.7/0 18?,H0 ~.~0 41.M S~,MS 1~,334 I,MS .... ll,324 10,M0 ~1 i ~ ~ 121131 &,~10 3.~I1,MS 1,751.471 S~I,~S IS.33 S44.1N -12.M3 ~S,M4 8,~l& 4M,~3S .,.. 01 6 OfT ~ Z,LM l'l'3,~d ~32, S3& 141.221 37.Ti I#,'A0 -S,S34 143 1,334 4,T~ .~.. M & 047 i,tT.Z T/ 3,MS,210 L~J0,1?S ~SS,10S ~.t2 117,113 137,~ #,MS .... {03,42S 01 & QttT ~ i'J3 1#,L%2 M,M(, M, MS 40,M 73,4/l *13,452 ii,M2 ~14 4,4{6 ,.. 0Flr fd~ OJC.! 1,M0 ~!1,142 ~3,470 67,612 23.2S $2,33/ $,43/ 4,141 .... 9,S72 10,N4 01 i ff~ Sl~ 3IS ~,R6 ~,924 M,~4 4L27 M, S33 {,~l T,1S3 .... 10,S34 16,~7S ~ SI1.E 011,! 6,22S M3,13g 101,02l tS,al 31.41 14,24& 31,)iS II,IU .... M,4'A .... ~1 i fit cut B2 M,~! ~,710 M,0S9 S0.Tl M,37~ l,iM 6,41~ .... 8,~ 10,S72 01 t fit Sl~ 1,01~ {11,024 Iii,rd3 Iii,II1 10.76 {24,400 31.Nl 2, H4 .... 39,415 01 i ff~ ~ 571 ~S, Ili 142,lti u,~52 {~.IS N,Sf7 -13,14S 132 .... -~,033 .... 01 i 0iT Sl~ 4,~2 SSS,St3 Mi,S~ ~0X,~? 33.Zl 204,137 -3,M0 2,123 .... -fi7 OI& OfT il~ 247 IH,417 ~.47S 71,~2 42.6~ TT,t{l 1.331 S,M7 92 6.NJ .... ~T il~ alit 1,4~0 335,272 3~,Z72 iS,NO 22.N (4,LSI ~S,144 l,~ .... 17,~S3 33,~0 M & ~T Sl~ 4M 297,1~8 I~,I2S 13Z,~S2 44.M )iS,l{{ mi,IS3 ........ ~S,IS3 {{,kO M & 0rit Sl~ ;.,423 {30,3'/0 199,336 131,0M {9.ii 103,~0 Z'/,II4 10,UF7 .... {7,241 el~ SII.E QIIl.% ?28 116,321 1,930 33.331 2J.R 37,2S.S -:J,N4 4,MS .... J43 .'... 01 i Ctrir Sl~ I11 I~Q M,633 -11.{33 45,337 .... 3S,,23~ 73,131 011 t OFF SdL~ I~I 22~,63! 124,37/ N,062 44.N M,323 3,741 .I, 1# .... J,iJ0 OFF ~ ~IJ 3,~S! (41,418 33~,5&9 139,149 24.13 121,0S5 38,7J4 2,6';7 3,SOS 37,4X4 .... 01 i OFF Sdl..E S47 I~S,U4 J4,01? Il,ti? M.4! 68,331 LI,~6 2,442 4,MS 10,33J .;.. M'Lr ~ 0r, J 33? 1~,S37 133,0'/3 3J,414 22.# 38,(~ 1'/3 1,24! .... Ll2t ..... ORr Si~ art 320 1'/0,21! 130,1~ 40,M! 23.53 37,GS 2,94 ,?,,~M 110 S,{12 7,~0 01 i fi7 Sl~ S17 )M,iS! 94,921 #,~30 #,S~ 77,403 12,327 4,k~ .... li,9S2 CI i MT ~ M2 1M,IM 100,616 M,272 M.?1 69,123 '2,151 I,M? 1,400 -{,SM 100 ~1 & ~T Sl~ )44 IR,312 ~,44S ti,M? 47.16 S~,lIS 3,142 M2 .... 4,L14 3,SO0 0IT Sii, E a~.! 4,M0 12J,MI 4H,927 174,#1 17JI. 123,126 SI,LiT 1,421 2,1~ P,403 iS,MO 01 & fit SILE 2S1 ll?JJ0 Ll,i?l !4,112 4S.~ 11,413 -27,~1 11,141 .... *S,M$ M~ 6 OFT t,&L~ 240 13&,176 Ii, MS SS,711 40.R S7,~4 q,333 711 .... -1,S~2 -3,000 fit SL~ (~! ~/I 235,?'~ I?S,O1S M,743 25.?~ SI,iS? i,IM 1,3M .... ]0,Z74 .... 01 6 ffi: ~ t84 ILS,243 102,M7 82,2S1 M.40 72,332 9,t24 S,7J7 .... IS.HI .... 01 6 Off ~ 18S R0,859 M,LS4 fl,20S 30.17 4S,~33 42S LS33 3N 1,327 ... 01 i ~ ~ 1,o4 ?o4.s5o iR,iii ~2,s22 4o.lo 2o2,m 10,IM 22,m m Z00.WI M & Q~ ~ 2,470 4;J,?~S H7,4~ II1,316 42.U 142,17l ~,144 6,H7 .... iS,ill II,~Q el i 0iT ~ 3S! ZS3,ISI ~3,335 Si,N3 33.M S~,~7 3,~6 LIt5 .... 6,2{) M 6 0~ Si~ S~ {03,464 176,~91 ~ql,073 42.53 {7,6?{ 42,{94 {2,~ 2,2~ ?2,477 01 & 0~ S~t 3,S80 I,M0,ISg 1,0S0,376 4t{,193 31.11 M0,R3 IM,~0 17,fM 1,0~S {25,N9 #,395 01 i MT ~ 2,6S~ S29,777 343,220 IM,5S7 3S.R 149,277 37,330 10,331 .... 47,616 SI,~R 01 6 ORr Sl~ 7~7 IIS,L~ N,420 17,43t 47.05 71,174 1,212 2,0LS .... 11,31'7 2S,MQ 01 6 0~' S&Z.~ I,MI {44,{34 U1,183 116,0S1 47.33 130,174 '14,123 ........ '14.123 .... 01 6 0flr ~ &V. 150~132 IS,?# i4,11~ 43.N 12,417 2.31{ l,~J3 1,134 I,JM 0iT ~ ~ 4,331 610,331 437oN0 I~2,331 11.14 116,R2 SS,33~ .... 37oll~ 1?,Si0 QI 6 0f7 8J~ 1,71q ~i4,S40 ISS,~S IHo~S 41.31 1~,t~2 {,MI 6,~ $o20~ ~o4~ 10,SM ~1 6 fit ~l~ ~ )~,Sll 7t,4~6 S2,093 40.S4 44,93{ 7,110 1,~3S .... I,~S 1,~3 ~1 60~ Sl~ SI ~ZT, SH ~2,M4 M,{SO 27.3~ M,112 -~1,112 7,502 .... -13,M0 S,~0 01 6 ~ SAZ.~ 333 1S3,K2 14,135 1~,617 .G.33 i3,1:.6 S,?S! 4,433 .... 10,119 22,27/ ORr ~ ~ 10,~4 ?~,08! MI,~ 206,111 2S.H 129,M4 71,2d~ J,S77 .... LS,474 M,215 0; A ~T tut 2,316 S47,S47 R7,S17 230,030 42.~ 193,?M ~6,~40 Ii,MS 3,TYl 47,147 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 822 South Third Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 554 '15 Phone: (6t 2] 348-6846 September 23, 1986 Municipalities, Recyclers, Waste Haulers, Vendors, Environmental Groups: Subject: Ordinance Number 13 - Solid Waste Source Separation Ordinance as ' Revised For Hennepin County On wednesday, October 15, 1986, at 10 o,clock a.m. 'in the Commissioners Board Room on the 24th floor of the Government-Center., 300 S. Sixth St., Minneapolis, MN., there %-111 be a Public Hearing for the adoption of Ordinance Number Thirteen as revised. Enclosed is a copy of the Revised Ordinance for your study. We encourage your input and will be available to answer questions. Should you have any questions regarding this Ordinance prior to the Hearing, I can be reached at 348-3563. Sincerely, Dan Huschke, Recycling Coordinator DH:kw HENNEPIN COUNTY Oil ~quoI oppoliUl'iJty ~mployRl' ~ 23 ~' LIST TO ACCOMPANY ORDINANCE Details of Chanpes ~ade to Ordinance 13 e 10. On Page 1: I~nediately following the first paragraph the words "at least" have been inserted prior to 16%. We believe this is an achievable goal and we will strive to go beyond it. On Page 3, Subsection 22: The definition for recycling has been changed the new definition is the same as we find on the "Waste l~nagement Act of 1980" State Statute. On Page 3, Subsection 23:' In the definition of "resource recovery" we have inserted the word "use" to ~_ke it consistent with the definition in the "Waste l~anagement Act of 1980". Again on Page 3, Section II, Subsection 1: Fourth line down the words "at least" have been inserted prior to the number 16%o On Page 4, Section III, Subsection 2: Subsection 2 has been deleted. Subsection 2 dealt with reporting requirements of collectors and haulers. we will get the information fr~n the municipalities when they apply for County funding of their source separation programs. In Section IV, four lines down: This phrase has been inserted "which includes source separation provisions as provided in Section V .... This phrase is intended to identify by reference the type of source separation County may implement if a municipality c~id not initiate their own program. Section IV last sentence: This ordinance shall be applicable to all municipalities, unincorporated areas, aDd.political subdivisions w~thin the geographical boundaries of Hennepin County Minnesota. Section V: Section V the word "Mandatory" has been deleted from the title of Section V. Section V title now reads "Source Separation Provisions". Section V, Page. 4: The. following phrase has been inserted the "County Board may implement any of the provisions contained in this section within the boundaries if said municipality fails to meet the requirements established in Section II of this Ordinance. This phrase is included to emphasize that Section V only applies in the event a municipality fails to establish its own program. Page 5 top of the page following D: The word "placed" has been inserted instead of the word "integrated" and the entire new phrase shall read "All aluminum, glass, and can recyclables shall be placed into containers and not mixed with other forms of solid waste or mixed municipal solid waste in a __,~_nner consistent with the ru/es, regulations, and procedures, adopted by the County Board." This rewording does not tie the County to any one specific technology of intermediate processing but would let the County specify the details for collection appropriate to processing technology at that time. 11. 12. On Page 6, Section V B: Section V B was formerly section VII in the previous document. This change was made so that Violations and Penalties only apply to ~_-~icipallties that don't institute their own program. Page 6 Section V-B Subsection 1. Language was changed so that the MAXIMUM charge that can be levied is a misdemeanor. A lesser and more appropriate charge can be levied at the discretion of the prosecutor. 13. Section V B Subsection '4 b) this section was added so that the County may seek reimbursement for establishing a Source Separation Program within a municipality that has failed to establish its own program. 14. Section V C: Section V C was formerl~ section VIII in the previous document. 15. Section VI on Licenses was deleted from previous document. Licensing was initially included for two reasons, a.) reporting requirements; to document the amount of materials recycled b. ) assure safety compliance of collectors equipment. We have been able to address the reporting requirements through our funding program to the municipalities and equipment safety is adequately covered ~through state statute and vehicle licensing. 16. Section VI: 17. Section VII: Separability was Section IX in the previous document. Section VII was previously Section X. ORDINANCE NUMBER THIRTEEN SOLID ~s. STE SOURCE SEPARATION FOR HENNEPIN (XDUNTY An ordinance regulating the separation of recyclable materials from mixed municipal solid waste by generators, before collection of such materials within Hennepin County; defining the geographic area and the types of materials subject to designation; establishing procedures and principles to be followed by the various municipalities located in Hennepin County in order to reduce the of solid waste generated in the County and to recover and deliver acceptable waste generated within the County to a resource recovery facility, as specified herein; in order to promote the health, w~lfare and safety of the public pursuant to Laws of Minnesota 1969, Chapter 847, and Minn. Stat. Section 473.801, et. seq. WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council, by state statute, has established a source-separation goal of at least sixteen (16%) percent for Hennepin County~ 'and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Hennepin County is required to establish source-separation goals for each city in Hennepin County; and WrlE~2~, said sixteen (16%) percent source-separation goal is hereby established for each city in Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the County desires to provide financial incentives for cities to establish source-separate progr~m~ to meet their city's source-separation goals and contribute toward meeting County source-se, pa.ration goals; and WHEREAS, the County desires to establish a further inducement to cities to develop source-separation programs which meet source-separation goals by adopting a County source-separation ordinance requiring the separation of m/xed municipal waste by generators, before collection, of materials which can be readily separated for use or re-use; and WHEREAS, the County desires to support local source-separation programs by establishing a facility or facilities to receive, store, process and/or prepare for sale, reuse, or otherwise dispose of recyclable materials. The County Board of Hennepin County, Minnesota, does ordain: SECTION I DEFINITIONS The following words' ahd phrases, when used in this ordinance, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section. Subsection 1 "Aluminum Recyclables" shall be deemed to include all disposable containers fabricated primarily of aluminum and commonly used for soda, beer, or other beverages. Subsection 2 "Can Recyclables" shall be deemed to include ali disposable containers fabricated primarily of metal or tin. Subsection 3 "Cities" means statutory and home rule charter cities and towns authorized to plan under sections 462.351 to 462.364. 1 Subsection 4 "Collection" means the aggregation of waste from the place at which it is generated and includes all activities up to the time when the waste is delivered to a "waste facility". Subsection 5 "Collector/s" means any person/s who owns, operates or leases vehlcles for the purposes of collection and transportation of any type of mixed municipal solid waste, and/or recyclables. Subsection 6 "Compostible Material" means organic material consisting of grass clippings, leaves and other forms of organic yard waste. SUbsection 7 "County Board" is defined as 'the Hennepin County Board Of Commissioners and their authorized representatives. Subsection 8 "Department" means the Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy. Subsection 9 "Facility" means any resource recovery facility or related Transfer Station or similar facility to which waste is required to be delivered. Subsection 10 ~Carbage" means animal and vegetable wastes resulting from the handling, preparation, cooking and consumption of food. Subsection 11 "Generation" means the act or process of producing waste (as defined in Minn. Stat. Sec. 115A. 03, Subd. 11).<= Subsection 12 "Generator" means any person who generates waste (as defined in Minn. Stat. Sec. 115A. 03, Subd. 12). Subsection 13 "Glass Recyclables" shalI be deemed to include jars, bottles and containers which are transparent or translucent and primarily used for packaging and bottling of various matter. Subsection 14 materials. "Hauler" means a collector or transporter of recyclable "Metropolitan Council" means the council established in Minn. Subsection 15 Stat. Sec. 473. Subsection 16 "Mixed Municipal Solid Waste" means garbage, refuse and other solid waste from residential, commercial, industrial and co~m-~unity activities which is generated and collected in aggregate, but does not include auto hulks, street sweepings, ash, construction debris, mining waste, sludges, tree and agricultural wastes, tires and other materials collected, processed and disposed of as separate waste stream-~. Subsection 17 "Municipality" means any incorporated city within the boundaries of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subsection 18 "Paper Recyclables" shall be deemed to include paper of the type commonly referred to as newsprint. Expressly excluded, however, are all magazines or similar periodicals. Subsection 19 "Person" means any human being, any municipality or other public agency, any public or private corporation, any partnership, any firm, association, or other organization, any receiver, trustee, assignee, agent or other legal representative of any of the foregoing or any other legal enti.ty. Subsection 20 "Political Subdivision" means any municipal corporation, governmental subdivision of the state, local government unit, or special district. Subsection 21 "Recyclable Materials" means all items of re_*use designated by the Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy to be part of an authorized recycling program and which are intended for transportation, processing and remanufacturing or reuse. .. Subsection 22 "Recycling" means the process of collecting and preparing recyclable materials and reusing the materials in their original fora or using them in m~nufacturing processes. Subsection 23 re-use of materials, derived from waste. "Resource Recovery" means the reclamation for sale, use, or substances,' energy, or other products contained with-i~ or Subsection 24 "Source Separation" means the separation of recYclable materials from mixed muh/cipal solid waste at. the source of generation. Subsection 25 "Solid Waste" has the meaning given it in Minn. Stat. Section 116.06, Subdivision 10. Subsection 26 "Recyclable Materials Processing Facility" means a facility established and used for the receiving, storage, preparing and/or processing of recyclablematerials for sale or reuse. Subsection 27 "Waste Tire" means a pneumatic tire or solid tire for motor vehicles as defined in Minn. Stat. 169.01. and included in the Solid Waste Management Plan pursuant toM inn. Stat. 115A.46. SECTION II GENERAL PROVISI(I~S Subsection! 'It shall'be the responsibility of each municipality to adopt an ordinance or ordinances relating to the separation of recyclables within the boundaries of the municipality, the purpose of said ordinance being to reduce the amount of solid waste generated within the municipalityby at least 16% which is an amount established by the Metropolitan Council and adopted by the Hennepin County Board. Subsection 2 The implementation and enforcement of said ordinance shall be the responsibility of each respective municipality. If a municipality should fail to implement a program by January 1, 1988, or implement a program which fails to meet the waste reduction percentage established by the Hennepin County Board, the provisions appearing in Section V of this Ordinance shall come into effect. This Ordinance shall not prohibit a municipality or municipalities from entering into agreements relating to any facet of source separation of recyclables. 3 SECTX(~N XXX REPORTING REQUX~S Subsection I Each municipality shall report all information relating to waste generation, collection an~ disposal within its boundaries to the Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy. Such information shall include but not be limited to; data on tonnage generated in the municipality, data on recyclable materials generated and collected within the municipality, and such addltlonal Information as ~s reque-~ted ~y ~he Department of Environment a~d Energy. Such information shall be provided on an annual basis by or on March 1st of each year, or as otherwise directed by the Department of Environment and Energy. SECTICN IV MI~XCIPAL FAILURE TO HEEr STANXIa/~S ESTABLISHED IN SECTION .Il If any mUnicipality fails to establish or implement a source-separation ordinance as provided in SECTION II, or fails to meet the percentage level of waste reduction as established by the County Board, the County Board may implement a source-separation program which includes source separation provisions as provided in section V, within the boundaries of said municipality. If such a program is implemented it shall be enforced upon all persons residing in said municipality. This ordinance shall be applicable to all municipalities, ~{ncorporated areas, and political subdivisions within the ~eo~raphical boundaries of Hennepin County Minnesota. SECTION V SOURCE SEPARATION PROVISIONS - ~- County Board may ~!e~nt any of the provisions contained in this secti_~_-with!_-_'the bou~=ie~ of a municipality, if said municipality fails to meet the requirements est_~b!ished in section II of this ordinance. Subsection i Pre-collection. All persons who are owners, lessees, and occupants of any building, c~rcial or residential, within Hennepin County, which generates mixed municipal solid waste, shall separate from all solid waste the designated recyclable materials before disposal, removal or collection: a.) Paper recyclables, which shall be bundled separately and secured in such' a manner as' to prevent them from being blown or scattered, and shall be maintained in a dry condition free of any other substance and shall not be placed in plastic bags. b. ) Aluminum recyclables shall be clean of all contents and such recyclables shall not be placed in plastic bags. c.) Glass recyclables shall be clean of all contents. Caps, lids and all metal shall be removed prior to collection and such recyclables shall not be placed in plastic bags. d. ) Can recyclables shall be clean of all contents. Can recyclables shall not be placed in plastic bags. Ail aluminum, glass and can .recyclables shall be ~ into containers and not mixed with other forms of sol~d waste or mixed municipal solid waste in a manner consistent with the rules, regulations and procedures adopted by County Board. Subsection 2 Container Requir~nts. Containers shall be provided by all persons who are owners, lessees, or occupants of any building, c~r~ial or residential, and shall be: a.) maintained in a cle~n m~ sanitar~ condition in accordance with all pertinent health statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations; b.) located in ~uch a manner so as to prevent them from being overturned or obstructing pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic or being in violation of any statute, ordinance, rule or regulation; and c. ) free of any holes, gaps or spaces. " Such further specifications relating to c5n~ainers may be adopted by the County Board. Subsection 3 Collection. The collection, removal and disposal of recyclables shall be supervised by the County Board, which shall have the power to establish the time, method and routes of service. Special times for large item pick-up may also be established. Collection provisions shall include but not be limited to the following: a. ) Notice of dates and times of collection will be published or otherwise made available to persons affected herein. b. ) Collection shall be conducted by licensed collectors or haulers of recyclables. c.) The Department ~a¥ establish drop-off or collection sites where any person may deposit recyclables at such times and locations as determined. d.) It shall be unlawful for any person other than employees of the Department, or authorized persons, collectors or haulers to distribute, collect, remove or dispose of recyclable materials after said materials have been placed or deposited for collection. e.) Nothing in this Ordinance shall abridge the right of any person to give or sell their recyclable materials to any recycling program lawfully operated for profit, non-profit or charitable purposes. f.) Nothing in this Ordinance shall abridge the right of any authorlze~ recycllng program to lawfully operate within Hennepln County, subject to such other licensures o= 'other regulations as may be required by law. g.) It shall be unlawful for a person to collect, remove or dispose of mixed municipal solid waste wh/ch consists of recyclables combined with other forms of mixed municipal solid waste. · Subsection i Misd__~eanor. Any person who fails to con~l.¥ . wzth the provisions of this ordinance ~ay be charged with a vzolatzon · not exceeding a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punished as provided by law. A separate offense shall be dee=ed_ ccnmitted upon each day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Subsection 2 Remedies Cumulative. No remedy set forth in this Ordinance for violation of this Ordinance is intended to be exclusive of a~y other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Ordinance of now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. , No delay in the exercise of any remedy for any violation' of this Ordinance shall later impair or waive any such right or power of the County. Subsection 3 Injunctive 'Relief. In the event of a violation or a threat of violation of this Ordinance, the County may institute appropriate actions or proceedings including application for injunctive relief, action to compel perform~_nce or other appropriate action to prevent, restrain, correct or abate such violations or threatened violations. Subsection 4 Costs and Special Assessments. a). If a Hauler or any Person within said County collects or disposes of recyclables in violation of this Ordinance, the County ~ay take. the necessary steps to correct such violations and the costs thereof may be recovered in a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction and the Property Tax a~ Public Record as a special tax against the real property owned by such Hauler or Person. b). If any municipality, unincorporated area, or political subdivision within the geographical boundaries of Hennepin County fails to meet the requirements established in Section II of this ordinance, the County Board, to the extent that it has assumed the responsibilities that the local unit has failed to assume pursuant to Section II, may seek reimbursement in any court of competent jurisdiction, for all costs, expenses and expenditures which the County has incurred incident to the adoption, implementation, administration and enforcement of a source-separation ordinance within the boundaries of a local unit. 6 Subsection i Warnings. The Department or any of its duly authorized represents, tires and collectors and haulers of recyclabies, may issue a warning notice to any person observed not in compliance with any provision of this Ordinance. a.) The warning notice shall be on such form(s) as provided by the Department. b. ) Forms shall be provided to collectors and haulers who may issue such warning notices by placing or attaching them to waste containers or on the prem~se.$ where the violation occurs. . c.) A copy of any warning notice as issued by a collector or hauler shall be forthwith sent to the Department. Subsection 2 Collection Refusal. A collector or hauler may, upoa · issuance of a warning ~tice for noncompliance, not accept for collection of noncomplying waste materials. Subsection 3 Costs for Compliance. A collector or hauler may, upon is~,.ance of a warning for noncompliance, undertake to render any noncomplying recyclables placed for collection to be in compliance and a reasonable fee for undertaking shall be allowed and reported to 'the. Department. The Department may certify the fee as' costs to the County Auditor as a special tax to be assessed against the real property of the person in noncompliance. Subsection 4 Citations. The Department or any of its duly authorized representatives shall have the power to issue citations for violations of this Ordinance, but this shall not permit such representatives to physically arrest or take into custody any violator except on warrant duly issued. a. ) Form of Citations: Citations shall contain at least the following: {1) The ~mme and address of the person charged with the violation or the owner or person in charge of the premises, at which the violation occurs. (2) The date and place of the violation. (3) A short description of the violation followed by the section of this Ordinance violated. (4) The date and place at which the person receiving the citation shall appear and a notice that if such person does not respond, aw arrant maybe issued for such person's arrest. (5) The hams of the person issuing the citation. (6) Such other information as the Court may specify. ~ b) Issuance of Citations: Whenever any representative of the Department discovers any violation of this Ordinance, he may issue a citation to the person alleged to have corn-' mitred the violation and such citation shall be in the form specified in paragraph A) of this subsection. Such citation shall, be made out in quadruplicate (4). One copy thereof shall be issued to the person alleged to have committed the violation; one copy shall be filed with the Department; two copies thereof shall be filed with the County Ordinance Violation Bureau. c) Issuance: The citation sbmll be issued to the person charged with the violation, or in the case of a expressly or impliedly authorized to accept such issuance. d) Appearance: After the issuance of the citation and within such time as shall be fixed by court rule, the person charged with the violation shall report to the Violations Bureau. e) Complaint: ~If the person charged with the violation does not appear at the Bureau within the time specified by court rule, the Bureau shall sehd him a notice directing him to respond to the citation within seven days of the date of the' notice and if such person fails to respond, the Bureau shall cause a complaint to be signed and a warrant to be issued for the arrest of such person to compel his appearance in court. SECTION VI SEPARABILITY It is hereby declared to be the intention of the County Board tha~ the several provisions of this ordinance are separable in accordance with the following: Subsection i If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this ordinance to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provision of this ordinance not specifically included in said judgment. SECTION VII PROVISIONS AREACCUMUI-~TIVE The provisions in this Ordinance are accumulative and additional limitations upon all other laws and ordinances heretofore passed or which may be passed hereafter, coveringany subject matter in this Ordinance. INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle, City Manag~~ Bill Hudson, mc~ Polil~/ National K-9 T~ ATE October 10, Off. John McKinley called this morning and informed me that it was official that he placed first overall as the National Champion, out of 119 dogs. He placed second in obedience, 3rd in total attack, and a member of the first place team. I talked to Len this morning and he requests tha~ a reception be held for John upon his return. McKinley will be returning on October 12, 1986, evening hours. I would like to talk to you about this reception.