Loading...
1987-04-14 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, APRIL lq, 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Minutes of the March 2q, 1987 Regular Meeting· Pg. 896-905 PUBLIC HEARING: CASE NO. 87-620: Lot Size Variance, Setback and Conditional Use Permit for Grocery Store (Grimm's Store) at 3069 Brighton Boulevard, for Devlin Gleason. Pg. 906-91q Reset Public Hearing to Consider Amending the Zoning Map to Change the Zoning of a Portion of the Property along Northern Road from B-2, General Business to R-2, Single Family Residential (SUGGESTED DATE: May 1%, 1987} Resolution Proclaiming the Annual Sale of Buddy Poppies By the VFW Pg. 915 Pg. 916 Resolution Amending Resolution ~87-59, V.F.W. Post ~5113, Commerce Blvd. Pg. 917-921 7. Street Light Request - Oaklawn Lane Pg. 922-929 8. Street Light Request - Three Points Blvd. & Dove Lane Pg. 930-933 Comments & Suggestions fr'om Citizens Present 10. Approval of Labor Agreement Between the City of Mound and Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local #320 - PUBLIC WORKS 11. Bid Award - 1987 Seal Coat Program Pg. 93~-935 Pg. 936-937 12. Request to Use Launching Facilities at Mound Bay Park for Minnesota Open Bass Classics Tournaments, June 7, July 18 & July 19, 1987 Pg. 938 13. DISCUSSION ITEM: Exterior Storage Ordinance Pg. 939-96q 14. Hennepin County Road 15 Project: A. Preliminary Cost Estimate from Hennepin County B. Possible projects to be done in conjunction with County Rd. 15 Project Pg. 965-969 Page 894 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Approval of Garden Leases Resolution Authorizing the Mayor & City Manager to Execute a Quit Claim Deed to Sell City Property - Part of Southwest 1/2 of Lot 16, Block 14, Arden Pg. 970-972 Pg. 973-976 Resolution to Authorize Mayor & City Manager to Execute Quit Claim Deed Selling City Property Lots in Block 11 and Part of Lots in Block 10, Whipple Pg. 977-980 Resolution Reconveying (if necessary) Certain Tax Forfeit Lands Back to the State and Requesting the County Board to Impose Conditions on the Sale of Said Tax Forfeit Lands and to Restrict the Sale to Owners of Adjoining Lands Lot 2, Block 13, Avalon Pg. 981-984 City Attorney and Prosecuting Attorney Annual Reports Gambling License - VFW #5113 Pg. 985-994 Pg. 995 DISCUSSION ITEM: No Smoking Policy DISCUSSION ITEM: Defense and Indemnity of City Council Members, Employees and Appointed Officials Pg. 996-998 Funding Request from Westonka Intervention Project Pg. 999-1010 Payment of Bills Pg. 1011-1026 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: Ae Be March 1987, Monthly Reports as Prepared by the Department Heads · Minnetrista's response to City Manager's letter of March 31, 1987, regarding Proposed Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Pg. 1027-1066 Pg. 1067 Ce Action Alert from the League of Minnesota Cities Regarding an Election Bill in the Legislature, Senate File ~1B41, which everyone should oppose. Pg. 1068-1069 De E® F® Another thank you letter to Ms. Grace Brunner and Ms. Eugenia Petersen for their $50.00 donation for the purchase of bullet-proof vests for the Police Dept. An invitation to the next Mound City Days Meeting to be held, Wednesday, April 22, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. Mound City Hall L.M.C.D. 1986 Financial Statement Pg. 1070 Pg. 1071 Pg. 1072-1075 Page 895 ~0 March 2~, 1987 MINUTES - MOUND CIT~ COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING I~RCH 24, 1987 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, March 2~, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 53~1Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City. Attorney Curt Pearson, Finance Director John Norman, Building Official Jan Bertrand, City Engineer John Cameron, City Planner Mark Koegler, Police Chief Len Harrell, Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm, Fire Chief Don Bryce, and the following interested citizens: David Morse, Jim Nordby, Mike Tobey, Ron DeVinney~ Mary Rafferty, Jim Rafferty, Harry Putt, Keith Putt, Jan and Michael Kraemer, Bob Malers, Vickie Gupstrom, Gerald Babb, W.M. Barkley, Ed Freidlund, Dorothy Caster, Ralph Todd, James Roseen, Steve Coddon, Kefin & Jayne Hetchler, Lewis Caster, Frank Niesen. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance_was recited. MOTION made by Abel, seconded bY Jensen to approve the Minutes of the March 10, 1987, Regular Meeting, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion'carried. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY. The City Manager reported that the revised amount is $1,807.85. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There was no response. The Mayor closed the public hearing. ' Johnson moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-54 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,807.85 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF WATER SERVICE FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. March 24, 1987 CONTINUATION OF CASE #87-606. 607 & 608: ISSUANCE OF A ~0NDITIONAL USE PERMIT ESTABLISHING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT' AREA AND APPROVAL OF A pLAT & VARIANCE FOR LAND LOCATED AT ,]838 COMMERCE BLVD., PID #13-117-24 33 0006 (SHERWOOD-DRIVE 'AR~A)' FOR DAVID MORSE The City Planner reported that a new plan has been submitted identifying two new single family residential lots that receive access' from a 16 foot wide driveway easement. The new lots are 22,000 square feet and 27,000 square feet in size. This new arrangement will allow the installation of a future cul-de-sac.. off of Commerce Blvd. The Staff recommends approval of' the preliminary plat, the conditional use permit to establish a Planned Development Area (PDA) and issuance of a variance allowing the new lots to front on a private easement rather than a public street, with conditions outlined in the proposed resolution. The City Engineer reported that a revised grading and.drainage plan has been submitted. He also reported on the extension.of the utilities to the new lots. Abel moved'and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-55 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA), ,APPROVAL OF VARIANCES AND APPROVAL OF A PRELIHXNARY PLAT FOR THE MORSE ADDITION, PID #13-117- 24 23 0006, P & Z CASE t87-606, 607 & 608 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #87-609: FINAL APPROVAL OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR SUBDIVISION OF I.AND LOCATED AT 4841BARTLE~¥ BLVD- PID #13-117 2~ 44 0003, FOR STEv£ CODDON The City Engineer reviewed the request of the applicant. The applicant, Steve Coddon, asked that the City transfer $500 of the $1000 held in escrow for Case ~86-610 to this Case number. The City Attorney suggested adding ~11 to the proposed resolution which would state: ,Posting:of a subdividers escrow in the amount of $500.00 for engineering, administrat, ion and legal costs". The Council agreed. Jensen moved and Abel-seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 87-56 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FINAL REGISTERED LAND SURVEY, PID #13-117-24 ~4 000~, PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 117, RANGE 24 WEST, P & Z CASE ~87-609 42 March 24, lg87 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion uarried. CASENO, 87-618= LOT SIZE & SETBACK VARIANCE. FOR LOT 14, BLOCk 14, DEVON; PID #25-117-24 11 0043, KEVIN · JAYNE HETCHLER, 4913 ISLAND VIEW DRIVF - The Building Official explained that the applicants are now asking for an enclosed deck and the deck size in the proposed resolution should be 12 feet by 22 feet. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The City Manager stated that a letter from Mr. Lewis Caster, 4917 Island View Drive has been received and he has attached his engineers report and recommendations on drainage. The Council discussed the grade and drainage and asked that if this item were approved, the engineering report provided by the Casters be included in the resolution. The City Engineer agreed with the Caster's engineering report. Councilmember Jessen expressed concern about intensifying a non- conforming use on this small lot. Abel moved and Smith seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION ~87-57 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND GRANT A VARIANCE TO PLACE AN ATTACHED GARAGE 18 FEET TO 20.3 FEET FROM ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING UNDERSIZED LOT, AND SIDEYARD, LOT 14, BLOCK 14, DEVON, PID ~25-117-24 11 0043, P & Z CASE ~87-618 (4913 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE) A roll call vote was q in favor with Councilmember Jessen voting nay. Motion carried. CASE NO. 87-619: 'LOT SIZE VARTANCE FOR LOT 7, EXCEPT THE NORTH FEET & LOT 8, BLOCK 9,. DREAMWOOD? PID ~13-117-24 21 0029, FOR ROB MAIERS, 1729 BLUEBIRD LANE The Building Official explained the applicant,s request. was~discusslon on the drainage problem in the area. Jensen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #87-58 There RESOLUTION TO CONCUR NITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING UNDERSIZED LOT FOR LOT 7, EXCEPT THE NORTH 14 FEET, AND LOT 8, BLOCK 9, DREAMWOOD, PID ~13-17-24 21 0029; P & Z CASE ~87-619 (1729 BLUEBIRD LANE) The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~3 March 2~, 1987 CASE NO. 87-620: .pERMIT FOR GROCERY STORE (GRIMM'S STORE) ~RIGHTON BLVD., FOR DEVLIN GLEASON LOT SIZE VARIANCE, SETBACK AND CONDITTM USE AT 306~ The Building Official explained the request. The Commissio~ tie voted and did not recommend approval. Planning Th& applicant explained that he feels there is a need for this neighborhood grocery store and that is has historic value because it has been there since 19~2. Mr. Mike Tobey, who lives next to the store spoke in favor of having the store. His only problem was people parking in front of his driveway. The Council briefly discussed this item and decided to take gction on the variances and the Conditional Use Permit application when the item comes before the Council at a Public Hearing on April 1~, 1987. MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Johnson to table this item until the public hearing on April lq, 1987. The vote was unanimously in favor.. Motion carried. CASE NO. 86-558: APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN & VARiaNCE FOR MOUND 254q COMMERCE BL¥~., LOTS 26-30, 32 ANDPART OF 33. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION #176 The City Engineer stated that there are-items that were in the previous site plan which are not in the new site plan. The items are as follows: 1. An easement acceptable to the city engineer along the drainage ditch. 2. A 6 foot green strip along the west side of the property. 3. Concrete curb & gutter around a bituminous parking lot. Mr. Frank Niesen, representing the VFW, stated they would rather not finish the parking lot with concrete curb and gutter and a bituminous surface at this time because of cost. He did agree to eliminate parking space #~8 on the current plan for green space next to the sidewalk on Commerce Blvd. The Council discussed the parking lot, the number of spaces and the occupancy of the building. They agreed they wanted the concrete curb & gutter and bituminous surface on the parking lot. Abel moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-59 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VARIANCES FOR MOUND V.F.M. POST 5113, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION ~167, COMMERCE BLVD., P & Z CASE ~85-558 MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jessen to amend the proposed' resolution to include: March *#11. A § foot green strip be left between the property line on the west side off the parking lot and the parking spaees.e The vote was unanimously in favor of the amendment. carried. Motion The vote was unanimously.in favor of the original resolution as amended. Motion carried. CONVEYANCE OF CITY OF MOUND PROPERTY TO JRW PROPERTIES (LYN~OO~ BLVD. AREA) The City Engineer handed out a map of the ~ parcels to be conveyed and explained that the City has fee title to the South 1/2 of Parcel 1 and all of Parcel 4. The City does not have fee title to the North 1/2 of Parcel 1, Parcel 2 and Parcel 3. JRW Properties would like to City to convey all 4 Parcels to them, because it is part of their parking lot. The City ~ngineer recommended conveyance subject to approval of the deed by the City Attorney. It was suggested that the City convey this property for $1.00. The Council discussed the price. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:- RESOLUTION RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SIGN QUIT CLAIM DEEDS CONVEYING 4 PARCELS OF CITY LAND TO JRW' PROPERTIES The vote was ~ in favor with Mayor Smith voting nay. carried. Motion C~OMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Russ Peterson asked for some clarification on the decision on item ~4,. the Morse property. The Council took a break so that Mr..Peterson could consult with the City Engineer. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ~;' THE FORM OF A DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING AN ENTITY AS "MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MONE~ MARKET FUND* AND AUTHORIZIN~ PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN INVESTMENT PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION The Finance Director explained that basically this is authorizing another official depository, but a special resolution is needed. The City Attorney corrected Section 1, "City Clerk" should read City Manager. March 2~, 1987 Abel moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #87-61 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREENENT IN THE FORN OF A DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING AN ENTITY KNOWN AS UNINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MONEY MARKET FUNDu AND AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN INVESTMENT PROGRANS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carriedL F~ASIBILITf REPORT - PROPOSED WATERNAIN EXTENSION, VACATED LAUREL The City Engineer ~ent over the background of this watermain extension. Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #87-62 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING APRIL 28, 1987, FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE INPROVENENT The vote was u~animously in favor. Motion carried. HAi~TENANCE PERMIT. REOUEST FOR SECURITY LIGHT AND STAIRS TO C '- The City Manager reported that the Park Commission has recommended approval with conditions. NOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to approve a Naintenanee Permit for a security light and stairs to Commons dock area for Jim Roseen, 1555 Bluebird Lane. under the conditions that the light have a looked outlet box and the stairs plan be approved by the Building Dept. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. Ron DeVinney was present asking that the City check and make sure that the docks and charter boats from A1 & Alma's are not infringing on Chester Park and Beach. The Council stated Staff would check. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jessen to authorize the issuance of Commercial Dock Licenses to A1 & Alma's (5200 Piper Road) and Charles R. Jones (dba. Ninnetonka Boat Rental, 4850 Edgewater Drive). The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. ~6 DEPARTMENT H~A~ ANNUAL REPORTS March 2~1, 1987 The following Department Heards presented their annual reports to the City Council: Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm, Finance Director John Norman, Police Chief Len Harrell. FIRE DEPARTMENT TRANSFERS OF FUNDS The Finance Director explained the two proposed resolutions. Abel moved and Jensen seconded the' following resolUtion: RESOLUTION ~87-63 RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER $9,350 FROH THE FIRE EQUIPMENT DEBT SERVICE. 1981 FUND TO THE AREA FIRE SERVICE FUND TO CLOSE OUT THAT FUND The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-64 RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER $2,827 FROM THE CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND TO THE AREA FIRE SERVICE FUND TO CLOSE OUT THAT FUND The vote was unanimously in favor. 'Motion carried. REQUEST TO USE LAUNCHING FACILITIESAT MOUND BAY PARK FOR MINNETONKA BASS CLUB FISHING TOURNAMENT The City Manager explained. The Council asked that the City Manager send the Club a letter asking that they limit the noise of the engines in the early morning hours when launching. MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jessen to permit the Minnetonka Bass Club to use the launching facilities at Mound Bay Park for their annual Bass Fishing Tournament on June 6, 1987. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SET PUBLIC HEARING MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Abel to set April 14, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider amending the zoning map to change the zoning of a portion of the property along Northern Road from B-2, General Business to R- 2, Single Family Residential. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. LICENSE. RENEWAL: TREE REMOVAL & HAWKER - FOOD VENDO~ MOTION made by Johnson. seconded by Abel to authorize the issuance of the following licenses: ~7 March 2~, 1987 TR££ R£MOVAL Bear Tree Care Robert F. Dahlke Lutz Tree Service,'Inc. Todd Scheiding, DBA Certified Tree Management Emery's Tree Service Shorewood Tree Service Sutherland's Nursery & Tree Service aA~KER - FOOD VENDOR Blue Bell Ice-Cream The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. pAYMENT OF BILLS HOTION made by Jessen, secOnded by Johnson to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list, in the amount of $133,302.96, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager stated that Mr. & Mrs. Bernard Lister, 2721 Tyrone Lane, have donated $25.00 toward the purchase of bullet- proof vests for the Police Department. A. thank you letter has been sent. INFORHATION/MISCELLANEOUS: A. February 1987 Financial Report as Prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. B. Planning Commission Minutes of March 9, 1987. C. Memo dated March 16, 1987 from Jim Miller, President, League of Minnesota Cities on "State of the Cities, 1987" and a copy of the report. D. Copy of the February 1987 issue of ~ Mana~emenZ magazine published by the' International City Management Association, (ICMA). Main Topic is the ,Council-Manager Plan", the form of government the City of Mound has. £. REMINDER: State of the Region Meeting sponsored by Metro Council, March 25, 1987, Minneapolis - St. Paul Hilton, 1:30 - 8:30 P.M. Let me know if you want to attend and I will pre-register you. F. REMINDER: Public Input Meeting on Lost Lake at the Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, March 23, 1987, 7:30 PM, City Hall. March 2~, lg87 Patrolman Kyle Larson has resigned his position with the Mound Police Department effective March 31, 1987. He has accepted a police officer position in Maple Grove. Kyle has served the City well the past 2 years and we extend our appreciation for his efforts and congratulate him on his new appointment. The Cable TV Advisory Committee will be undertaking a community survey of subscribers who presently have Cable TV service. The purpose of the survey is to collect data on such items as responsiveness of Dowden. Cablesystems to Cable TV needs, reception problems, billing process, programming, etc. The City Council approved the survey concept last fall. The committee has developed this survey over the past few months to send out on or about April 1, with return to be by May 1. We will share the data with you once it has been tabulated. Park Commission minutes of March 12, 1987, meeting. J. School Board Minutes of March 9,. 1987. K. REMINDER: CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION. Saturday,-March 28, 1987 at 8:30 AM, City Hall. MOTION made by Abel, seconded by jensen to adjourn at 11:00 P.H. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The Council then met in Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations at 11:05 P.M. They adjourned at 11:35 P.M. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk BILLS ......... MARCH 2q, 1987 Batch 87qO31 Batch .87q032 Computer Run dated 3/14/87 Computer Run dated 3/19/87 96,761.q5 35,331.64 Anoka VTI Economy Dictation SuperAmer|ca Fi re School Registrations Exami ne Dictaphone Feb gasoline 280.00 15.00 914.87 TOTAL BILLS 133,302.96 C]TY OF' HOUND Hound, HjnnesOta NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN~ TO CONSID£R ALLO~INO STRUCTURAL HODIFICATJONS', APPROVAL.OF VARIANCES' AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT FOR. GROCERY STORE .KNOWN'AS .GRI/~I'S'.STORE, 3069 BRIGHTON BOULEVARD,' '.1~ THE B-3'NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRIC¥. NOTICE IS HEREBY GiVEN.that on Tuesday'., April lq, 1987, at 7:30 P.H. at the C. ity' Hall, 53/~1 Haywood Road,'.Hound, Hi. nnesota~ a :hea~ing wi 11 be held to consider a'llowing'.structural:modifications to .the building presently known as 'Gri.mmts Store~., .306~) Brighton Boulevard; and to consider approving variances and a cond|tfonal'.use.permi.t .for a grocery store In the B-3 Neigh- borhood Zoning District.,. Property legally described as: Lot 18, Block 15, Arden; PIG Number 2q-117-2/~ /43 0017. All persons appearing at' said., heari..ng will 'be g'iv=en .the 'opportunity to be heard. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Commlssic~ and Staff FR(~: Mark Eoegler, City Planner D~= March 9, 1987 Variance (Grims Store) CASE ~t3: 87-620 VHS FILE NO= 87-310-A14-ZO EXIgi~ ZONING: Neighborhood Business (B-3) PLAN= Residential BACKGROUND= The applicant has applie~ for a variance to recognize the existing setbacks and lot area for the grocery store at 3069 BriGhton Boulevard (Grims Store). The existing store consists of approximately 1300 square feet. and has a one foot setback on the north, a six foot setback on the east, a 17 foot setback on the south and a 9 foot 10 inch setback on the west. The lot area totals 3000 square feet. In the B-3 zone, uses are required to have 10,000 square, feet of lot area. Required setbacks for the existing store are 50 feet on the north, 30 feet o~ the east, 30 feet on the south and 50 feet on the west. The subject property will require a 7000 square foot lot area variance, a 49 foot variance along the northern property line, a 24 foot variance along Brighton, a 13 foot variance along Tuxedo and a 40 foot 2 inch variance along the western property line. Additionally, the applicant shows a total of 7 parking stalls and the ordinance requires 9 stalls resultin~ in a 2 stall variance. ?07 COMMENTS: The Zoning Ordinance allows variances providing that the use is not intensified. The proposed improvements to the grocery store are structural and cosmetic in nature a~d will not increase the size of the. building. In addition to the proposed variances, a new conditional use permit should be issued for the store. The existing store is a grandfathered use a~d as a result, no written permit currently exists. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit and recognition of the existing variances for the grocery Store at 3069 Brighton Boulevard subject to the following: ®The existing parking area shall be reviewed by the City t~gineer to ensure adequate ingress/egress. ~ I:~ I0 HT 0 N o CaseNO. CITY OF HOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION (Please type the following information) Street. Address of Property~~~~:~~ Legal DesCription of Property: Addition ' A ~Ae ~ Fee Pal d O~te FI led Applicant (If other than owner): Day Phone No. Name Address 5. Type of Request: (~) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review (.) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( ). Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other *If .other, specify: ' ~, Present Zoning'District' ~ '" 7. Existing Use(s) of Property . . ' 8. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or condltional use permit or .other zoning procedure for this propertyT ~1(~ If so, llst date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and' provide Resol-ution No.(s) . accompany present request· I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry In or upon the premises described in thls applicatlon by any authorized offlclal of the City removing such of Hound for the purpose o_~f Inspecting, or of. posting, maintaining and _o. Plannlng Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure (2) O,. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilitles, et~. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional Information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the 2onlng Ordinance. III. Bequest for a Zonin~ Variance .A? All.information belc~v, a site plan, as described In Part II, and general appllcatlon must be provided before a hearing w111 be scheduled. Does the present use of the property'conform to all use r~gulatlons for the zone district In whlch It Is located? Yes ( ) No .... , specify each non-conforming use: B® Do the existing structures comply with'all area hei~h~ and bulk regulations for the zone district in which It Is.located? Yes (~,)~ No ( ) If Unote, specify each non-conforming use: O. Which unique physlcal characteristics of the subject property prevent Its reasonable use for any of the uSes.permitted In that zoning distrlct? ) .Too narrc~v (.) Topography' ( ) Soil Too. small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow. ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: , E. Was the hardship d~scribed above created by the action of anyone having property.interests In the land after the ZOning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (~ If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by any'other man-made change, such as the reloca- tlon of a road? Yes ( ) No ~ If yes, explain: Ge Are the conditions of hardship for'which you request a variance pecullar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~ No ( ) If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? H..What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, slte plans with dimensions and written explanatlon. Attach addltlonal sheets, If necessary.) I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance/ * and.the'roof trusses'to-brlng,.the'bulldi.ng up-to-code, and for safety reasons. ~0 This block i~ oil marsh 7 e>15 3. Case No. 87-~2~ Variances.for. Lot STze'and'Setbacks'¢or 3069 Br. lghtbn. Blvd, Lot 18, Block 15, Arden;.P~O 2%')~7-2~ 4~ 0017' : Devlin ~leason was. present,' The Clty Pla~ner, ~ark. K oegler, revlewed ~Is'rep&rt,'glv~ng.the;&xlsting ~lzes and setbacks, the requirements'and.the.amoun~t, of varlances'needed'.wh~ch ere: 7,000 square foot .lot area~.a ~9 foot:variance along.the'northern property (existing setback Is 1 foot and .50 foot.ls.req61red because Structure abuts residential), a 2~.foot va'rlance along. B~i~ht6~ a .]3 foot variance along Tuxedo and.a ~0 foot 2 lnch varlancea)ong the Western property."llne .(also abutting reslden~ial) and add)t)onally"2'.stall parki6g..vari.a~ce.~'He commented this request doesn't IncFease'the bU)k.of.the building.'.. The applIcant, Deviln GIea~on, commented"he Is buylng'the bus.lness and he will operate it, ~ainly, he ls putting in new floor, ~ew beam going through the . center, new joists, beefing'up the ~oof., put'lng In new'electrical with a 200 amp '.service, ,hooking up to'Clt~ sewer,and.lnst~lllng p.lumblng. The Co~Isslon asked about the 50 percent..on this request'(cost of what. woul.d.be, done). G).eason figures the value to be.about'$~0,000 and will be puttlng In about $20,000.+. (Preseht tax value ls lis'ted as $22,200.) It was noted that the . foundmtl~n Is good; hal,clay tile walls'. The beam~ and support posts are being changed. The structure was built In 190q endprobably wou~d quallfy is,an hlstorlcal bulidi~g '(Outside would have to be left un'changed).' The neighbor, Hrs. Tobey', has real concerns; their property wraps around and she commented that.she tried to purchase store.ln order'to'i~.evel; but i.t.was too exp~nslve. If building is'to be t'here, she"d like to'~ee.it upgraded. The Commission dlscus's'ed that It. ls very much nonconforming structure. The permit ~as Issued for non-struct'ural Improvements llke rooflng, fir out existing walls~ insulate and putting i.n bathroom partitions;' be reopened as. a grocery store. It was .noted that there is not a conditional use permit on thls property, but there should be. The Commlssion discussed at length; they asked..~b6ut' proposed'hours of operation and what'alternatlves, there might be for thls property?' Gleas0n Stated he pJanned on bein~ open about' ? a.m. for commuters to perhaps 7 p.m.;"ln the summer, perhaps until ~ p.m. · Kc?.egler state~ you have to allow some reasonable use of 'the property or h~ve the City acquire It. :'.:--L .C ' Meyer moved and Smith Seconded a mo~IOn .to recommend, approving.the staff recon~endatlon to a~lo~ fixing.up the buitdlng and recognize.'the existing non-conformancles and/bring the building up to Building Code. The'parking in front of the store was discusseS: and felt to.be .hazardous' ' · to chlldren exiting.the store.· It was'suggested.that ""no parklng" be allowed from Tobey"s mail box t~ corner and It' be signed. - Chairman Reese stated he Intended t6 vote 'againSt thls motion and he~d .like bls reasons .noted in the minutes, They are as follows:.: On Page.2 of City Att0rneyis.lettec to City Ma~age~.Leonard. K~pp..~ated..- Sept. 18, 1969,.which says, ~!The.general rule of law is. that where a · .property .owner purchases property after adoptlo~, of a zoning ordinance ' which restricts the property"s.use, he has no standing to complaln that the res:rlction on the use unlawfully diminishes the value of this property." ~age 1 of City Attorney"s letter da~ed Aprll 15, 197& which says if, " ~hen l.t.w~s conveyed to hlm,'applican~ and hls predecessor in tltle knew that bls :lot' di'd not 6eet these .requlreme~_~"~ .... !"The' property owners of · subs.read, rd lots,d0~not have an'automatl~rlght to the Issuance of permits~' partlcul.a.rly when ownership at the tlme of the adoption of the ordinance was'In common wlth ownership'of abutting properties,'making it physical.ly feaslble to combine such separate Idts'of record for purposes of the Issuan.ce;of permits to bulld only one single.family dwelling..~ The vote on the.motion was: Reese, Mlchael, 5ohns and ~eIland against; · Anderse6, Meyer, Smith and'The1 in favor; vote is tled, ~ to ~. Motion failed. This will go to the City Council on March 24, 1987. After further'discussion by the Commission: .... Smith moved and Weiland seconded a motion that if the Council approves ~ the variance request, the Planning Commlsslon would waive having this item come back to the Plannlng Commission for a Conditlonal Use public hearing. The vote was unanlmously.ln favor. CITY OF ~DUND Mound, Minnesota R-R~ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NOTIC2: IS FIERE~Y GIVEN that cx~ Tuesday, Hay lq, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. at the City ~lall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, a hearing will be held to consider the rezoning of parcels 76, 26, 27, 28, 30 and 29 from B-2, General Business to R-2, Single Family Residential (see map below). The rezoning is being considered to bring a majoriLT of the residential uses into conformance with the Mound zoning Code. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the o~po~cuniLT to be beard. Dakota poised Rezoning R-2 April I RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE ANNUAL SALE OF BUDDY POPPIES BY THE VFI~ ~IHEREAS, the annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States has been officially recognized and endorsed by governmental leaders since 1922; and I~HEREAS, V F W Buddy Poppies are assembled by disabled veterans, the proceeds of this worthy fund-raising campaign are used exclusively for the benefit of disabled and needy veterans, and the widows and orphans of deceased veterans; and WHEREAS, the basic purpose of the annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars is eloquently reflected in the desire to "Honor the Dead by Helping the Living". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the' City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby urge the citizens of this community to .recognize the merits of this cause by contributing generously to its support through the purchase of Buddy Poppies on the day set aside for the distribution of these symbols of appreciation for the sacrifices of our honored dead. Also urging all patriotic citizens to wear a Buddy Poppy as mute evidence of our gratitude to the men of this country who 'have risked their lives in defence of the freedoms which we continue to enjoy as American citizens. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councllmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councllmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk TO McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES INC. 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 (612) 559-3700 ATTENTION WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ Attached Fl Under separate cover via [] Shop drawings [] Prints [] Plans [] Copy of letter *' O Change order C) ~he following items: [] Samples rq Specifications DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval [] Approved as submitted ~ For your use r'l Approved as noted [] As requested [] Returned for corrections [3 For review and comment [] [] FOR BIDS DUE 19 [] Resubmit ,. [] Submit r-I Retum ..copies for approval copies for distribution cor~ prints _ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO O. 66' SiTE PLAN FOR MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113 iN AUD[TOR$'S SUODI¥[S[0N NUHOER 167 HENNEPiN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ,. ~.~ . Scale: 1" = 30' · Date : 3-17-87 qZF_.~, ~-~ Datum: Mound City se~er ~: Existing spot elevation' COFFI'N & GRONOERG, ~: Proposed spot elevation --.-: Drainage arrow (~ote: Utility and spot elevation / information suppl~ed by others Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Proposed Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #87-59 MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113, COMMERCE BLVD. BE IT RESOLVED,' that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby amend Resolution 87-59 as follows: 7. The developer shall post a performance bond or irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $35,000. 12. Adopting a revised site plan dated March 26, 1987. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember- The following.Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk 75 March 24, 1987 NO. 87- 59 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VARIANCES FOR MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 167, fDMMERCE BOULEVARD ~EREAS, the City Council on March 24, 1987, considered a request for the issuance of parking variances for V.F.W. Post 5113; and WHEREAS, Section 23.716.2(2) of the Mound Code of Ordinances requires 10 x 20 foot parking stalls and the site plan dated March 17, 1987, indicates 9 x 18 foot parking spaces requiring a space size variance; and WHEREAS, Section 23.716.3(4) of the Mound Code of Ordinances requires a fence along, the east side of the site which is zoned R-1 and no fence is indicated on the site plan requiring a variance; and ~EREAS, Section 23.716.3(1) of the Mound Code of Ordinances limits driveway entrances to 22 feet in width and the site plan indicates entrances 25 feet in width requiring a three (3) foot variance; and ~EREAS, the principal use of the property is a permitted use in the B-l, Central Business zone; and WHEREAS, the proposed variances satisfy the criteria for granting variances as stated in Section 23.506.1 of the Mound Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDby the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the parking variances are hereby approved subject to the' following: An occupancy permit for the building will not be issued until the following conditions have been met: 1. Review and approval of all plans by the DNR and Watershed District. Hennepin County shall review the locations of entrances along Commerce Boulevard and issue a permit for access to the county road. Parking lot construction shall consist of a perimeter concrete curb and gutter and 3 inch bituminous surfacing with a minimum 4 inch Class 5 base. An easement acceptable to the city engineer shall be Granted along the drainage ditch. 76 March 24, 1987 e ® The southern parking lot shall be shifted 3 feet to the north creating a 6 foot green strip along the southern property line. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the city planner. The developer shall post a performance bond in the amount of $48,000. Handicapped parking spaces shall conform to code requirements and shall be appropriately signed. Exterior signage shall comply with the Mound Sign Ordinance. Trash dumpster location and screening shall be reviewed and approved by the building official. 11. A 6 foot green strip be left between the property line. on the west side of the parking lot and the parking spaces. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Abel and seconded by Councilmember Johnson. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel, Jensen, Jessen,'Johnson and Smith. The following Councitmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Attest: City Clerk 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Jan Bertrand FROM: Mark Koegler DATE: April 14, 1987 SOB3: VFW Landscaping I have reviewed the landscaping plan (enclosed) submitted by VFW Post 5113 for their new building along Commerce Boulevard. Although the plan identifies a minimal amount of plant varieties, the plan is adequate and the plantings should enhance the appearance of the building. Representatives from the VFW stated that all planting beds will be mulched with wood chips. Due to maintenance concerns, I recommend that all mulched areas contain rock installed over a poly base in lieu of the proposed wood chips. With the one modification noted, approval of the plan is recommended. S/TE PLAN FOR MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113 IN AUDITORS'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 167 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 66' Frl 66' Propose& Scale: 1" = 30' Date : 3-17-87 Datum: Mound City sewer ~: Existing spot elevation ~: Proposed spot elevation --~.-: Drainage arrow !Note: Utility and spot elevation information supplied by others COFFI'N & GRONBERG, INC Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Edward $. Shuckle Jre City Manager Dear Hr, Shukle Jr,: I would like to have a city street light installed Oaklawn Lane between County Road #110 and Idlewood Road. 'J./ R o,',i D .! 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 March 31, 1987 Mr. Allan Gustafson 2929 0aklawn Lane Mound, MN 5536q Dear Mr. GustaCson: Sometime ago you inquired as to whether or not a street light could be installed on 0aklawn Lane. I am enclosing a copy of a survey done by Police Officer dohn Ewald a couple of weeks ago. There seems to. be a mixed opinion as to whether or not a street light should be In- stalled. Prior to bringing this matter to a'City Council meeting, I would like a petition signed by you and your neighbors regarding the support of a street light Installation. Please submit the petition to me at your earliest convenience, and I will place it~on the City Council agenda for an upcoming meeting. If you have any. questions, please contact me. Edward ~.{t[Shukl., Jr. Clty Manager ES:Is March 14, 1987 To: From: Re: Chief Harrell Officer Ewald Street lights on Oaklawn Lane I made a check with all residents on Oaklawn Lane and the following report states their reasons for or against addi- tional street lighting, which was originally requested by Mr. Gustason, along with a summary there is a map of exist- ing street lights in the area. · 2900 Oaklawn Lane 472-1133 I talked with Mr. and Mrs. Larry M. Meehan, who state that they have teenage children. Because of the age of their children it doesn't matter to them whether a street light is put up or not. · 2901 Oaklawn Lane 472-1653 I talked with Mr. and Mrs. Alfred Heitz. They have no objection to a street light as the street is .very dark, but they would like to see the light put in a location that would benefit everyone on the block. · 2935 Oaklawn Lane 472-5649 O. Maurer doesn't want any more lighting in the area as it shines in her windows and bothers her. · 2942 Oaklawn Lane 472-6817 I talked with Dames W. Hild. He has no children, but believes that it is too dark in the area. He would like to see a street light placed at about the center of the block. · 2942-Oaklawn Lane 472-4238 I talked with D. A. Sederquist. Has no children but would like additional lighting in the area. This resident, lives downstairs. · 2943 Oaklawn Lane 472-5075 I talked with Mr. and Mrs. Gary C. Dohnson, whose · children are ages 11 and 14. They would like to see additional street lighting. They put in a request for more street lights approximately 10 years ago. · 2949 Oaklawn Lane 472-5884 Hr. and Mrs. 3ohn C. Anderson have two small children and would like additional street lights as it is very dark. Another reason is because of the vacant lot across the street. , · 2953 Oaklawn Lane 472-3266 Mr. and Mrs. Ray R. Cox live on the corner of Idlewood and Oaklawn and have a street light which lights up their area. They did state that it is very dark on th· other end. They have no children. · 2983 Oaklawn Lane 472-7658 I talked with RafaeI Paz, who is a senior citizen. He would like to See more street lights in the area for the safety of the children in the area. Feels it would detour any burglars or'attempted break-ins. · 2954 Oaklawn Lane 472-2772 R. N. Lewis states that it is very dark and it would be nice to have a little more lighting in the area. 2965 Oaklawn Lane Mrs. Boggs hasfour children.' She would like to see a street light in the area but doesn't care where it is located. · 29710aklawn Lane 472-6190 Mr. and Mrs. Kent M. Christensen'have two small children who are not yet in school. Feel that in the future when their children start school it would be nice to have more lighting in the area. Felt that the area is dark on one end. 2974 Oaklawn Lane 472-5382 I tried to visit Nicholas S, Novak, No answer. found out that the telephone was disconnected. Later · 2977 Oaklawn Lane 472-1402 Harry Baert believes that the present lighting is sufficient;, doesn't feel that the city should spend money on additional lighting. 2929 Oaklawn Lane 4'~2-5802 Mr. Gustason.was the individual that requested the street light. He has his own lighting (high pressure sodium) and he doesn't feel that he should have to pay for the street light. Feels that the city should furnish the lights to light up the block. Also stated that he has had vandalism in the past. In checking this area over during a two week. period feel that the lighting is as effective as most other street lighting in Mound, partially due to privately owned high pressure vapor lighting located at 2929 Oaklawn Lane and 2942 Oaklawn Lane. If additional street lighting was to be installed I would suggest that the light be located on either the east or west side of Oaklawn Lane at Idlewood. If I can be of further assistance on this matter Chief just let me know. c o , ,,/ "rX' t~ o ~ O q, / / o ..Z'OI.£ Woo D R oa l> C.o.h ~er. O+ /70 ? Dov~ _/~ .~_. April 5, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Chief Harre11 Officer Ewald Street light at Three Points Boulevard and Dove Over the last few days I have made checks of the lighting in the area and have talked with all residents in the area as to what their opinions are for a street light at this location, which are as'follows: 1601 Dove Lane Have made numerous contacts over the past week, but have been unable to find anyone at home. Ron Klug and Kyle Rier 1604 Dove Lane They felt a street light was a good idea because it is dark at the intersection and they both go for walks. i610 Dove Lane A street light would not affect this resident, but would go along if the rest of the neighbors want it. 1609 Dove Lane The resident at this location has no preference. 1657 Dove Lane The resident, Marshall Weber, has one small child and feels it ts very dark in the area of Three Points Boulevard and Dove. Has also missed the turn coming'home at night. Arlee N. Mueller 1668 Dove Lane Has two young children and would like to see a light installed; also walks at night.. 1675 Dove Lane This resident doesn't fee1 that a street light ts needed on the corner. (1) 3. A. Pfarr 1680 Dove Lane Does not want a street light that will light up her yard. William Gulden 1701 Dove Lane Has no children, but would like a street light installed for extra safety in the area. A. R. Eberhart 1708 Dove Lane Would like a street light installed because of vandalism in the past; didn't report it to the police. Arthur Friedrichs 1709 Dove Lane Would like a street light installed as it is very dark on the corner. 1720 Dove Lane Vacant house for sale. 1729 Dove Lane Vacant house for sale. Lena Sjoberg 5118 Three Points Boulevard Would like a streetlight installed as it is very dark in the area. Her neighbor had some vandalism some time ago. Donald 3. HallidaY 5130 Three Points Boulevard Would like a street light installed as he has had vandalism in the past, but never reported it to the police. Also stated that he feels it is very dark on the corner. In closing, I feel that the street lighting in the area of Three Points Boulevard and also north and south on Dove is as adequate as the other street lighting of the surrounding streets.. Within the last two years I did a street light survey on Three Points Boulevard, at which time shortly thereafter three additional street lights were installed oK Three Points Boulevard placing one approximately every other block up and down Three Points. If I can be of any further assistance Chief just let me know. WO ODI~-~ F. OA~ 75 YEARS GITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 Apri] 7, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: .HAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ED SHUKLE, CITY HANAGER'' ' APPROVAL OF LABOR AGREEMENT BETNEEN THE CITY OF MOUND .ANO MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAN ENFORCEHENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL # 320- PUBLIC NORKS I have negotiated a tentative agreement with Local 320 - Public Works for the years 1987 and 1988. This.contract covers ali Public Works employees (excluding secretary) and unit supervisors. The changes are as follows: 1. Wages are to be adjusted by 3.5~ in 1987 and 3.5~ in 1988. ' The adjustment is to apply to ali steps and all classifications. 2. Insertion of language regarding.compensatory time off~ This'~as agreed to in 1986 by Memorandum of'Agreement, which a]]ows"emPloyees to take compensatory time off.in lieu of cash overtime, at the convenience of the employer. It also complies to the Fair Labor Standards-Act (FLSA). 3. Sick leave language is clarlfled to define it, state who is eliglble and under what conditions.sick leave is'to be used., ~. ~lmmediate Family~ is defined as it applies to funeral leave. The agreement applies retroactlvely to January 1, 1987. I recommend to you to approve this agreement and authorize the mayor and city manager through resolutlon to sign the agreement on behalf of the city. If you have any questions, please contact me. ES:ls April lq, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE HINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320 PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year Union Contract with the Public Works employees union; and WHEREAS, said contract would be effective January 1," 1987 through December 31, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct the Mayor and the City Hanager to enter into a labor agreement with the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 (Public Works) to be effective January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. Copy of same on file in the Office of the City Clerk. .. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councllmember The following Councllmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk McOombs-Knutson Associates, Inc, 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55441 612/559-3700 1-800-328-8322 ExL 784 April 7, 1987 Engineers Planners Sun, eyors Honorable Hayor and Members of the City Council City of Nound 5341 Maywood Road Hound, Minnesota 55364 SUBOECT: 1987 Seal Coat Program M<A File ~6173 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: Enclosed is a tabulation of the bids received on Friday April 3rd for the 1987 Seal Coating. Bids ranged from a low of $33,240.00, submitted by Allied Blacktop to a high of $41,800.00. The Engineer's Estimate for this project was $38,600.00. Public works is very pleased with the work done by Allied in the past five years; therefore, we would recommend they be awarded a contract in the amount of $33,240.00. If the Council should have any questions, we woUld be pleased to answer them. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3ohn Cameron dC: tdv Minnesota Open Bass Classics Tournament Trail April 6, 1987 Mr. Ed Shukley City Manager 5341Maywood Drive Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Shukley The Minnesota Open Bass Classics tournament trail has scheduled three tournaments on Lake Mlnnetonka this sunm~er. Knowing that many tournaments have used the facilities of the Mound Bay Park adjacent to the old Surfside Supperclub on Cooks Bay we respectfully quest the use of the area on 6/7/87 the day following the Minnetonka Bass Classic Tournament which has al- ready applied to you for permission. We will also 'be conducting another weekend tournament the weekend of 7/18/87, 7/19/87, again we would like to use the Mound Bay Park. We will be conducting Bass Tournaments on these dates and have applied for the necessary permits from the State DNR, LMCD, and the Hennlpin County Sherriffs Water Patrol. The hours of the tournaments will be from 5:30 AM to 3:00 PM on all dates. These are all catch and release tournaments. If I may be of any further assistance please contact me at 472-7926. Thanking you in advance for your coop- eratlon In this matter. Michael Gerber V.P. Tournament Director P.O. Box 185 ~~Mound, Mln ~~364 Minnesota Open Bass P.O. Box 195 Mound, Minnesota 55364 Date 1/27/87 Name/NUmbe r' //12 //13 #15 . #16 //17 #18 .Hoftelg #1g Glenn Smith //20. //21 Mason //22 //23 #2~ //25 PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN OF RECREATIONAL EQUIPHENT Page 3 'Address/LocatiOn 5001Woodridge Road Oversized & too-close to road 5013 &.5017 Avon. Drive Too close to the road 2032 Arbor 'Lane Oversized boat 2039 Arbor Lane Overs i.zed boat 5016 Edgewater Drive Trailer full of debris,, refrigerator/garb- age cans with no cove~s 50qq Edgewater Drive Too close to road 2216 Noble Lane School bus 2166 Overland Road Too close to road 2138 Noble Lane Oversized boat 5qa7 Breezy Road Oversized boat 53q6EQ & 5qq8 Spruce Road 5505 'Spruce ROad Too close to road 5517 Spruce Road Oversized boat 2217 Lynwood Boulevard Oversize boat .626q Red Oak Road - across from 8+ boats, RV & wood pile Page 1 Date 1/27/87 PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN. OF RECREATIONAL 'EQUIPHENT Name/Number Address/Location #1. Reese #2 Bailey #3 Eagle Lane Corner of Bluebird & Woodland Road 5036/50~0 Enchanted Road plex apartment building) #5 Sha leen Ztgq9 Three Points Boulevard Cross Country RV 1833 Shorewood Lane Trailer, car under tarp, 3 speed boats, etc. # 6 HenderSon 18/48 Shorewood Lane Oversized boat too close to road #7 //8 Dennis dohnson 3. Westland 1928 Shorewood Lane Too close to road - 2 boats 1932 Shorewood Lane 20~0 Shorewood Lane - vacant 1or & lot next door~ Boat storage - oversized boats on property //9 1956 Lakeside Lane -.Vacant lot next door RV from across the street -- //10 '1801Re~thaven Lane Oversized boats //11 Babler' 1785 Resthaven Lane Too many boats #12 Blanchard 17q9 Resthaven Lane. Oversized boat 31/40 Priest Lane RV Boat too close to street across from him. 3185 Priest Lane/end of Priest Lane Oversized &. too close to the road #15 Westedge & Setter Circle Boats at curb line HN7056 #16 Corner G1enwood Road $ Highland Boulevard African Queen HN 3805 DH - gray house //17 5573 Bartlett Boulevard Oversized boat Page 2 Date 1/27/87 PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN OF'RECREATIONAL EQUIPHENT Name/Number #18 #19 Jon.Nelson #20 Grudnowski #21 Bede11 #22 #23 #2~ City Property Second roll of film 1/27/87 # i # 2 Smykalskl //3 #5 # 6 Hetchler # 7 A. H. Empson '# 8 Ronald HcCombs # ~ Smith #10 #11 Address/Location 5525 Bartlett Boulevard Adjacent to wetlands across the street Bartlett Boulevard Oversized boat on vacent lot - HN8~OqEB 5~-~08q 5259 Bartlett Blvd. 'Oversized boat 2625 ~ilshire Blvd. Oversized boat (only 2 on premises) (rents out space in summe~?) q932 Bedford Road Oversized boat? too close to street a~7q Brunswick Road OversiZed bOat · Corner Brighton & Alton- , · Neighbors use as a storage y~rd $1~!2 Tuxedo Boulevard' across the street Oversized boat ~\-"~5180 Tuxedo Blvd. Oversized boat too close .to street. 3232 ~/arner Lane - across from RV too.close to Road & oversized Lanark& Tuxedo Blvd. Boats too close to road RV 66~!~. 3207 Roxbury Road ~ Boars'in street right-of-way , q913 Island View Drive ~925 Island View Drive - permit ? ~767 Island View Drive Too close to road S oversized? probably h705 Island View Drive School bus - Alaska plat& ~625 Island View Drive Too close to road with boat on hill "Catch 22"j 30a3 Island View Drive RV trailer home with tarp PAGE#113 5 MBER DATE ADDRESSED SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE 86/95A 10-27-861 Ron Krueger ~ Ass0c'iates, Survey for 2~0~ Tuxedo! .Complete info. on future 8080 Wallace Rd.,EdenPrairie ''surveys --~ 55344 86,,- IO-27-86 Bill Davis, Gustafson & Asso. 5377 Shoreline Blvd. Return in 5 days. ~ Balboa MN. Inc., 5340.Shore:' Grading Permit line. Blvd., Mound 86/97 10-27-86 Curtis A. Pearson Reg. PrOp. Abstract for Review tltle Cobblestone Cove, app. " S Final plat 86/98 10-~9-86 Darrell W.& Nancy L Barclay Division of tax.parcel 2666 Westedge B1vd. Lots 3 & 4, B1E 1, Bat- Mound, MN. 55364 dorf's First Addn. & ..... demo. permit required · ................. for fire damaged 9arag~ 86-99 11~13-86 Tim White, 2137 Centerview'Ln deck unconstructed & 15 days to remove strut ............ · .................... incomplete/permlt exp. roof ............................ dOeS.not meet codes. 86/10C 11-14-86 Gary Heines, q~2q Bedfor'd 'Rd~ 61'51 Bartlett Blvd· 15 days to remove ~ebr~, . ......................... Accumu. lation of debris etc. .......... . ........ materialS'$campet.'"tra iler 86/101 i1-1q-86 Judd..& Debra.Lu~sse.,..'3225 Debris & storage of rec If any violations, 30 ..... AmhUtSt.Lane-:.i'-' .... vehicles, etc. dags to correct 86/102 11-iq-86 Heigl Mtg. Co.,-Attn. Barba"ra. ~Oq8 3 Pts. Blvd. 30 days to correct Cole,q510..West"77th 5t;,Edina Accumulation of debris, 55q35 ........... etc. 8~O3 11-.18-86 Wm. McQueen,q985 Mpls.Av., . .54q~ Tonkawood Road -3(~Jays to take care of ' Mound 55364' ' Accum.of debris & 48 hours (due to fire')" secure/'removebuilding 86/1Oq 11-19-86 Jerome Neumann, 5979 Bartlett Illegal fence Remove fence or apply ......... '.' ............... constructed no permit for variance within 10 f ......................... days 86-105 11-26-86 Gary'Brown, 5971 Gumwood Rd. Accum. of tires, etc. 15 days to remove/recycl L 86-10( 12-2-86 Melvin Bosma,4663 Suffolk Rd. Bldg. beyond scope of 5 days to get permit/ · re-roof permit I 86-10' 12-5-86 .Letters to: Commercial Signage Requ re- 'Bethel United Methodist., 2116 ments; Submit app. in 10 days. Commerce.;'.Small Treasures,485~ Shoreline Btvd.; Sunlite Tan- nlng Studi. o,2337-.Wi, lshi. re.-BlYd. Westonka-Oance StUdio;'2337'Wilsh' ~108 12-12-Ub Kenneth KowalkJ~ 6bbl'~tY.~a ~eu/ ~anchescer Rd. 15 days to correct r 6,Maple Plain 55359/Ada Bede 1 Yd & house full of 3022 Shoreline Dr., Wayzata food,garbage & debri .... . ..... .'55391' Inoperable veh. 16-10 ' 12-23-86 John N. Curtis, q619 Kildare Accum. of debris & 30 days to correct Rd. materials 6-110 12-23-86 Steven R. Bohnhoff, 4687 I.V Const. without proper 10 days to submit app. Drive. permit i PAGE#113 tMBER DATE ADDRESSED ., , 4 ~uout~l COMPLIANCE DATE 16/73 7-23-86 Gregory. Busse, 3038 Dqndee. Ln. Storage bldg. on prop- ] 30 days to remove out- Thomas Forester. 3061Alexan+ e~ties deter!orat!.ng : building.. der & needs removing.' ~6/74 7-2q-86 David Huggett, 2919 Hazel~ood ~ill eroding onto neigh- 30 days to sod/lan,' ape Lanet Mound (sc) bor's land · 86/75 7-24-86 M/M Thomas..Je.rdee., 5917 Gum- Install pool without 10 days to get permit for woo'd'ROad'". ......... .' permit pool & fence 86/76 8-15-86 Michael Scott, 500~ flosedale Road Use violation 26.01 8- 10 days to remove carpet, --"-' .............. 23,.604.. refrlg.,stove, etc & bring ..... ""." .... '."'.'."'.'.". ..................... Into compliance 86/77 8-15-86 Richard..A...'Olexa~:.6609..Bart- 'Expire~ Bldg. Pe'r~it 10 days to arrange final · Lett'BlVd~ ............... 6763 lnsp. 86/78 8-15-86' Ma'rgaret .Thorne, 5012 Edge- Expired Bld~.Permit 15 days to arrange final water'Dr;" '~ .... 6591,6232 & 5715 lnsp. ~6;79 8-15-86 ................. Robert Ol. son,-.442~. .............. Denbigh Rc. Expired Permit 6613 !$ days to arrange final lnsp. 86-80 8-15-86' ..CarT. F,..JohnsO~,.6~3 Bay' ExPired Permit 6649 15 days to arrange final 'Ridge'Rd', Mound insp. 86/81 8-15~86 Gary Robt. B1tx~qS~5 Lanark Accumuiation of debris 15 days t~ correct Rd. 86/82 8-19-86 H/M J. Rusthoven,§15 Marshal Debri. s on public access 15 days to remove or Ave.',St.~ad1:5510~ &.'M/M. City take action to dohn Hurd~ 1579 ~ull Lane assess 86/83 8-26-86 !John'Royer,BenFranklin Store, Temp. structure on S. Remove by 9-1-86 or make 2281 Commerce Blvd. side of Store arrangement to construct to code. ~667-d~ 9-q-86 Edna Enstad, .q746'Bedford Rd~ Debris accumulation 15 days to correct. '~'7~-$ 9-5-86 .... Oel..Matheson~5062..Ba~port Rd[.~ Debris, car, etc. 15 days to correct 86/86 9-'&'-86... Ha~ci. son~p~. D~l~r~h ~o',.~-' accumulation ~ ~ .-~.~..,' .~-~ ' 26~7 'Co.mmerce Blv~ Meet B.O. week of ~.~-~S Ya.~ ' ~4,'-m~., .,_, · /~'~.~iba:aaG-:AYe., ~t;Pa~]'~.105 ..... No'.repa~rs done Call within 5 days. 86/87 9-19-8~ M/H Richard E. Sne].1, 702'.Oak 572~ Lynwood Blvd. 15 days to correct, etc~ wood Dr,~.'Anoka~ HN.-.55303. Accum.debris~ unlicens, d cc~'"Ke~'Berresi'572~'LynWo0d yehicle,no garbage can lids 86/88 9-19-86 Sam:Hancl. no, ~216 27th Ave. Accum. debris q618 KillJare 15 days to correct - -.. 'S,.t-.Hpl. s.-.55~O6.'-cc:..,..Gerl ..... ..... Pablson~.h618.Klldate .............. 86/89 9-22-86 Mound Super~tte, M/M ~cott Sec. 23.625 violation .remove by 9-25 Brickley, 2q42 Commerce Blvd. car "for salW' in CBD parking lot / 86/90 10-10-U6 Sungold Homes, q35 ~ater St,, 291q Bradford Lane 10 days to hear & - Excelsior, MN. 55331 .. foundation peer support correction or removal .... system'not.'to code by 1-1-87 86/91 10-10-86 Brookhaven .Homes, Inc., Mr. R~taining ~a11' i~ pu~li: Remove' within 37 days - ..... Bart Porter,'15572 Red Oak r~ght-of-way at 3018 or file for variance Rd.S~E.,Pr]Or Lake,MN. 5537~ Devon i by 10-22-86 cc: DonPeterson,K.P.Propert~s, . 32 Interlachen-.Court~Tonka..B~y 55331 ' Clt¥'M~r;.&.St;,SUptt ...... '"86/92 10-14-86 John T. Miller., 3149 Inver[ Ac'cum. of.debris, coml. ~O days to correct -- ness Lane .... . veh.,'unliCensed tra!lers MN. 56315 '" ." ........ ,n open garage~ etc. 86/9q 10-20-86 Randy Bickmann, 815 Cedar Av~:. 5516 Lynwood Blvd. , .~ --- S.,.Mpls., MN. 55qOq cc: , Hazardous Bldg. Loretta E.. Corbett,.3512. Texa. I Av;S:~ St:'Louis Park 55q26 ~(9_~ .10-20-86t Geor'g~ L~c~rem, 4601 Bruce S', 3155 Inverness' Lane I a Edina 55424 cc: Owner/occu- Accum. debris,materials · PAGE#113 3 3ER DATE ADDRESSED. ' ' SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE ~/h8 .5.~g-86 John E. Royer,. Ben Franklin ~' [nc|nerator~being used] Take out of service today ~-3 Store, 2281 Commerce Blvd. in vlol. of UFC Sec. : & remove dn|t In 30 day~. 11.]16. ~ 5-Z8-86 H/M J RusthoYen, ~15 Marshall AccumulatiOn of debris 50 days to clean up Ave., St. Paul.~ HN,..~$5101 ...... . &..mater.J. als at 5040 .................. EnChahted'Road ................ 6/4~ 6-~-86 ~r. uonn doyce, b31.1 Hilton 50~3'Enchanted ~°ad ...... COurt, Pine Sprl. ngs~ HN.'..551C3-.No-.garbage cans..and .-. days to correct cc': Tenant~'..5Oq3'£nehanted"~:a~cumulatlp~,'Of'pa.rb~~ .... .., , 6/5~ 6-q-86 Dennis Johnson (Estate)'3837: 1928. Shorewood Lane 10 days to 'contact.City " 2~thAve, S.', Mpls, 55406. Not. connected to City ~O.discuss . cC: p.~.~. ~reg.:Sk!.nne~' & ........ ~ater & Se~er Lines Jim'Thompson.':. .............. .... · ...... 6/51 6'-4-86 oa'n Sicheneder~- J-7=3~"..ShOre-' .... Res,.85-22' driveway 30 days to change drive~. wood,'LanF'"..~'".;f?'{~'', .... , .... n0t'as'apprpye~ . . way entry. ;~/52 6-10-86, Steven. Coddon, 4629 Abetdeen .Trail.er. Park 5 day to remove trailer . :. im ~ar Rd,,(C~r[ified,~l~,~¥ Mgr.;;°§635' Halstad Avenue and decks ~/$3 6-]1-86! Balboa Minnesota'Co, Attn,: ~eldlng.- Solarium 30 days to have approved Irene Porter,..5340 Shorelines;' Systems..'area. requires by approved'inspector. · : .... · ...... . ........ "~.' ......... spe6ial'ihs'pector- 6/54 6~12_86 .... ~/M Cra'l.g M,.. Hi. ll. erns,..)721.' .. Oemo)Ition permit for 5^~ay~ to get permit ...... Gd11.;.Lane'.:."' :..:.'.:.' '.'.~: '.::.' :..' '.'.' '1717'Gu!1 . )u0 ~ 16/55 6-12~86 'p~'f..::G~l~'ih~'~'6OS.'~este'dge',' "NO.'b'U'i'ld'i~9 permit 5 days to 9et permit f6/56 6-16-86 City Council .& City Manager Signage for.Mound's I.n~redible.Fes~ival 16/5:Z--. .6-26-86 Balboa Minnesota, .Inc,, Att'n. Completion S. correc~i.ors Maximum to complete · Phil P~ppler~ 5340 Shoreline of.ltems.in'Balboa listed items 60 days Blvd., Moundcc: Paul Purkel Bldg. Per' 3/35/86 letter(no add1. construction) 5300 Shoreline Bl'vd,.' &..Bruce. ... Oah19ren~ 5340 shorel.ine ...... . ~6/$8 · 7-1S~6 Eric A1]~, 1916 .ShOrewood'Ln. Accum. of debris +' tlr~s 5 days to remove ~6/$9 7-~z86 S~F~A~lA~O'Shorewoo'd 'L~, ,' "' " + tlr(s 5 days to remove B6/60 7-1-86 Dennis Johnson, 38~7 24th Ave., Connect to Mun$cipal 30 days to Insp. permit ..... S,.~ HplS,.,--$5406..cc~.-,Greg.-. Sewer Service 90 days (10-1-86) to. ..... :..:. skinner ............. .... .... ... complete ~6-61 ~-~-86' Ms. Brenda Jo .01son,-~92S~-Edge-. Insufficient garbag~ ca,~s '15 days to get adequaL water D.r.,~ MOund"cc:''Jbne .H~and : number 86-62 7-11-86 ~/MGerald Ya~nes, dr~,.5440'. Accumulation of. debris 15 days to correct/ LynwOOd'Blvd...' ' 86-63 7-15-86 Norma'~..Hemeri. ck~.-q~t6-.Beachsi-ce. Bldg. Permit 6050 15 days to arrange Lane','. ...... .'.".'.:'.".'..'.'-'..'-'-..'-'.'..'"expired progress/final insp. 86-6q 7-15-86 E'u~ne S;'SumsRis;qY.5~'Bur~'s'Fd;'B1dg;Pern~it'6269 Ex~. 15,,days to arrange insp~ 86/65 7-15-86 Clark'Peters,2146' Noble Lane Bldg. Permit 6419 exp. 15 days to arrange insp:~ 86/66 7-]5-86 Ronald NOrstrem, 4957'ljV.Dr. Bldg. Permi.t 6467 exp. 15 days to arrange insp._ 86/67 7-15-86 James C. Hendr|cks-, 3006 West- Bldg. Permit 6503 exp. :15 days to arrange insp. ledge B1~d. 86/6'8 7-15-86 joe Sz~'rke;l~56'~'horewood Ln;. Bldg. Permit 6554 exp. 15 days to arrange insp~- 186/69 7-15-86 Jeanne M. 01son/Geo,..Millford Bldg.Permit 6574 exp. 15 days to arrange insp. , 2270'tangdon'tane ......... 86/~~ Vernon B~andenburg,~ BIdg. Permit ~ 15 days to arrange insp. shi.r~'Blvd~ ............. 7-1 -86 M/M Mark Moriarity,4g07 Yi]- . Unlicensed &/or inoper' shire Blvd.. ............ ' ....... a~le..vehlcles $ viola-130 days to correct .......:...... ....... t~on'of'Home'OcC. Ord.. , 186/72 I 7-22-86 ~a¥ El'lis, 3801 5th St. iN.~., Permits 6~60'&'6~88 exP' 15 days to arrange insp. I i 4pls., MN. 55421 on 4625 Lakeside Ln. - IBER 86/24 86/25 86/26 86/27 86/28 86~29 86/30 86/31 86/32 86/3 86/3 86/3 86/36 86/3] 86/3[ 86/33 86/4( 86/41 86/43 86/44 86/45 86/46 86/47 DATE ADDRESSED .' 4/21/86 {'"Hike.Bar}ow; 2072"Commerce.- 'Blvd: ....... 4/22/86 4-23-86 4-23-86 4-29-86 4-30-86 5-2-86 5/8/86 Frank L. Mi. ttelstaedt, 5005 ewater"-Dt; .......... : ..... et.c;'unenclosed in.yard Hatthew J. Phlllippi, 21155 4721 Manchester Road PAGE#113 2 ' SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE .i Selling vehicles from ] Cease & desist selling R-3 i vehicles.. Accumulation of materia's '7 days to remove cbrrect. Minnetonka. Blvd.., Shorewood 5! Eugene G. Schlee, 3140 North Harbor Lane# 101, Bldg, 3, ;441 Gordon L..Wolf, 4610 Kildare Road cc: 'Jim Larson .. Todd Saterbak., 1724 Canary' Russell A.'Wltham, 2620 Hal- steadl. Lane:.:cc:,. Darrall.'l...Wi. 1 5051'Wobdland'.ROad ..... Oean W.'Hunter, 5043 Tuxedo Wm-R.HarriSon,.1829 Carroll Av.,St. Paul 55104. cc: Craig M..Claybough & Leo.E. Gosl'in,'.670~'.'Hay~tead.. Hr. Kenn'eth-Ket.chum~..1669.. ;331 tenant dumping on 3000.Inverness. Road "Accum. of debris etc.. at 3000 Inverness Lane · Finch'Lane". ................ : ..... Hike Malaske,6557 Bartlett Accumulation of materia &' &.-debris incl. removal "TOm"'LagOiP 'Ba.~tlett. i.i bf. lwhlte.~stor.shed~ etc. 5-12-86 Leon'Hafison;.'.2355;.Fai.~gi. ew'L~ .'Aecumu~atl.0n.:of:.debris 5- ~hen &-Mi~helle.Kokale~.r. '3121'o0nald'Orige ..... 5-13-861 .DeanLaForest~..4920..~l~shl. re.. l. noperable/unlicensed ............................ vehicle~"& Pts' · .Debra M..Hipp~ . Accumulation debris 5-15-86 5- cc: Thomas. Green, 4'037- Sunset Dr.~Sp~-Pk,,.55384 Reply to pekmit request to-do work at 4610 Kild Debris.& materials on yard 5051 Woodland Road -~.Accumulation of debris etc, Accumulation debris, nu materials'& equipment Accumulation of debris, ma[erial, etc., need proper garbagecans & .have.inoperable/ Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/etc. 30 days to remove 30 days to correct ~e rous 30 days to clean up.~ 15 days to correct ~s to clean up David M, Heinsch, 2147 Grand- view'Blvd. Mound cc: Police Randy EL Bi.ckmann, 815 Cedar Ave. S.w Mpls. 55404 Peggy E. Bryant, 5852 Idlewoo. Ave., Waconia,'MN. 55387 clean up/removed.at :1584 Finch Lane Illegal concrete busine facility at 2147 Grandv 5516 Lynwood Blvd. Accumula:ion o~ debris Met with re. hazardous 5-28-86- R.J.Fischer, P,O. Box 328, ..- 'MOU~d ............ 5-28-86 Robert J. Veilleux, S Tuxedo Blvd. ' 5-28-86 g-~0'86 Brookhaven Home~, Waters Edge Office Place, Suite 105B, 6885 Bondin St., Prior Lake 5 Eon Ande:soo. Rercill LYgGP 5842 Idlewood Rd. Thank yOu/copy of fence ord.'about mate~ to' clean up accumulation (sofa) at 2152 Belmont Lane .~iishire. Blvd.' ~ired'Bldc Permit" Oecaylng wood problem 3018 Devon Lane,' ~ sand in st, permit exP ;372 remove debris & l~ndsc~pe w/erosion cc Z~O~ Oaklawn"Ln~ day: . 15 days to correct ;S 'ew 30 day to remove/correct 30 days to " " clean up before 5-1~-86 o~ City wi11 cause it tc be done & assessed to property. _L~_~_--u.~ ~ Oiscontinue by 6-1-86 '15 days to correct -.~ "115 da~s 'to correct - lO'days to remove & boa rd u~p bldg ,ulldin9 ~,,~. ~['~~ ials allowed sent By June 1, 1986 30 days to complete - '.'.'&'arrange lnspec '.n '- 30 days to move ~ ' 48 hours for' sand; [red 30 days for erosion '. codtrol & 7/27/86 fo nt?l/Comp.letion I ~_~Z~. ~_~, 19B6 pAGE~i~3 ' #1 }MBEE ~ DATE ADDRESSED ' ' SUBJECT COMPLIANCE, DATE ~/1 1-6-86 HerbAnderson 2636 Tyrone LN., Non-conforming sign J'. ~/2 1-/-~6 M/M Roger Eager, 1649 Gull Ln. ~ccumulation of ~ebris 30 days to cqrre~t.. ' & materlals, veh~les, ~ O ..... -' etc, · ~ ------8-:~'6~~ Larson, City "Attorney Encroachment of garage Send Podany notice of ........... ~ ........ · ............... onto nelghbor~s prop. pending legal action if ............... · ............ Ned'POdanY~'6165'Sincl 'r not corrected/removed. 6/q 1-13-86 M/M Charles..Wei. be], No tihal i6~pectio~"Ekp, I0 days to arrange 5047 ~ren Road ..... Bldg. Permit #6684(8-8-80 for inspection 16/5. 1-23-~6 To 'whom it may concern Occupancy o~ building" ~greement to obtain permi VFW, 2544 Commerce BIvc.'repalr. furnace, etc. & · . ~ermlt for elec. work .~ Re~ve various items, et~ ~ months to correct plbg.& remove storage from base~ ~6/6 3-10-~6 Memo to Jim Larson,' P~osecuti ~g Formal Complaint at Atty. 2235 Langdon Lane, ...... -' · John Babler Residence ~'__. 86/7 3-10-86 ..... Nm. Al. exander omA. Capt. Biily:s Final inspection -. 60 days to be installe:. ' ' .... 5241'ShOrellne'B]Vd' · no makeLup air unit & tested. 86/8 3-14-86 Waterford. Proper. tles,'.lnc, Chapman Place, 2670' Prior.to buildi6g occu · 4969 01son Memor.lal. Hwy, ........ Comme~ce..Bl-lling for pancy submit covenants. M~ls., MN;'55422" ..... .''.'.'''"' Engr.:.;..Lega. l.&'Plane.in9 Fees assn. & declaration. 86/9 3-27-86 Robert Triplett, 4571Wilshire Expired Bldg. Permit 30 days to complete Blvd., Mound ..... # 6777 age pr renew permit. 86/10 3-27~86 Steve Bergesen,-951.W.-Central 5317 Piper Road Garbage all over front _~ AVe., St;'Pa6I'5510~ ........... . yard - 15 days to Corr,: 3-27--:~-~ ~i-~-&T~-~~4925 ~5 Drummond Roa-'---~-'-'~ 15 ~a~s to correct '- Drummond Road .... Garbage all over, n° ..................... covers on cans '86/12 ~-27-86 J~net H~sselbrlng~ 49~9.:Oru~ :Ga'rbage'all over, no 15 days to correct mond Road ....... ' .' ........ covers'on cans ' ; 86/13 3-31-86 Ronald R. Kranzler, 20145 Parl 5137 Hanover Road-Unlocced 15 days to clean up Place,.Deephaven, MN. property with accumulat on and secure house..v/ · of debris incl. garbage I86/14 4-I-86 Union "76", Robert Reutlman, 4831 Shoreline Blvd. 24 hours to remove temp. 305.East..Rlce'St.~..Wayzata, Violation of CUP & Sign 4'X 6 sign. ~MN.'55391 ................... Ord, I86/15 4-2-86 Thomas Green~ 4037 ~unset Dr. '1584 Finch Lane Accumu- 15 days.to remove & 'Sp;Pk,. 55384"cc: Owner/.OCcup~,nt lat.ion of debris correct /86/16.... 4'14-86~ curt PearSon, CityAttorney 2942 Oaklawn Lane ! 4-21-86 Letter to'Robt. C.Holberg,Jr. Hild vs. City of Mound Ans. rec'd from Holberg~ 86/ . . 30 days to clean up i~' 4-14-86 Ms Peggy E Bryant Accumulation of ~ebris 5852 IdlewoodRoadi Mound I 'l~l~ 4-14-86 Nail Schoenhofen, 6116 Bart- Accumulation of debris 30 days to clean ' lett Blvd. L6/i9 I 4-15-86 Dick Johnson, 1709 Canary Ln' Ponding of water on Correct.in ~O days. own & neighbor's prop.' . . . 14-15-86 M/M Tim Harrel, 1732 Cana~yLn. Renting sgl.family res. Cease & desist rental cc: Tom Turner, Merrill Lyncl as duplex use & arrange insp..3~ & Robert C. Jasper _ _ ~ da~s .... -~6~86 M/M PeterW;-Johnson, 3140 Flnal'|~--sP~--'"~f'3140~P'~iet'~t~lOin~p.'~days veYifyt°'arrang~elevati~.re': I~ Priest Lane .ngt done. 86/23 'q-lO-Ob 'Earl Nielsen,12900 St. avl L~ts at Maywood Md. & - i Road, Mtka., MN. 55343 HiddenVAle Ln. filling Get grading permit & r~ move fill from right of without permit ' way. PAGE#11~ IMBER DATE ADDRESSED ' ' SUBJECT .... ~U~rLIRN~E DATE ~/85 9-16-85 BernardA. Ouhachek, 19~7 La_k.~- Debris ~ateriais on~ 15 days to correct ..... si.de .Lane~...Moun~,'~N; ........ lot-a'cross.'s'creet~ Lo~ ............... ............ . ..... . ....... 8, Block'7;'Shady~ood ~Pt; ............... .~- '7/85 9-16-85 Paul Scherber, 3900 Walden Cease & des'lst using access°rYrental bldg' for . .~'i~19850ct'1'~ d~ · Rd., Vayzata 55391 ;~/85 9-20-85 M/N.Gayl.e. Schuf~enhauer*.. Bldg. retaining wall 10 days to submit appl. 6350 Ramble~.Lane..,... ..... ..no-permit ~/85 9-20-85 Ms. Kim O. Ryan .......... Bldg. retaining wa11 10 days to submit appl ;0/85 6363'Rambler"Lane ............ no'permit ' 9-24-85 Roger& Betty J. Drews Being operated as autc 15 days to cease & desist 5646 V. Hearn, Glendale, AZ. repair in viol. 23.63~ 85306 cc: Jeff Moot (5084 Three Points BI~J.) ~1/85 9-25-85 Ms. Elizabeth Fitz No final insp. P. 6468 10 days to arrange access 6380 Acorn :Road.'" :'~* ..... -72/85 9-25-85 John Leu, 3107'Argyle'Lane.'. ;: NO'final; 'lnsp. P # 6493 IO'%da~s~ %~'~gi~cces'"~ .73/85 9-25-85 L'inda Ledray~6016'BeachWOod.* ..... . .p #.6440 ,, 7q/85 9-25-85 Jack'Ostgig;.'4718'Hampton.-R'd , .. p # 6464 ,, '75/85 9-25-85 PatriCk'*FO.le~'q633.*.ManCheStet'". ,, P # 6515 ,, 76/85 9-25-85 Gary 'Shaleen;183~'Shor¢~ood.. ... ,, p # 6656 ,, 77/85 10-~-~5 Hs.gatherine U.l&ason,-4u/~ W. 51st St., Edina 55424i*CC: 3137' Donald Drive' Obtain permits to correct Clinton Gables,4431Dorcheste ~us~i~hi~J~ dayA Mi chae 1 O' Oonne 1'1,215 S. Cedar ~~~,~'~r'~~lll~.u- Lake Or.,..Mpls...55405'..& Tl.m ...... ShannOn~255..~i11.St;;.E~:. .......... 78/85 10-11-85 Dave Heinsch DBA Built Rite Exterior storage g 10 days to remove. Concrete, 2147 Grandview.Blvd. debris on City Parking · Lot behind. House of Mo 79~85 10-24-85 A.1an..Greene~,.2645~Casco Pt', 5013 Avon.Drive, Hound Code requirements Vayzata, 'MN.''5'539'1"cc:Marily~ Hinricks,5013 Avon corrected within 30 days 80/85 10-28-85 Bruce Ahr, 11427 ~. River.. Boat storage on Lots 15 days to remove Hills Dr., Burnsvl-lle, MN.55.;3~ 18 S 19, Blk.6 Dream- house boat cc:'Vllard E..Morton,.3430 wood PID 13-117-2421 0013 List'Place'*Mp1.s.,MN;55416 81./85 10-28-85 Robert E. Meyer, 5652 Twin Boat storate on vacant ~4~ days to remove Lake Terr., Crystal, HN. 5542 land PID 13-i17-2421 boat 0055 82/85 10-28-85 John Es. sameia~3~}~%a~l-e:~:. No .permit for deck 10 days to submit app. ....... 100 E,. School..St,.~. Carl. l. sl.e, 6382 Maple.Road .... I0~a*'50047'*'.'". ....... . ....... 83/85. 10-30-85 Mr. F. Germain~ 3567 Crystal Accumulation of debris I0' days to remove debri~ Pl.ace~ Navarre,. MN...55392' at'4560 Dorchester Rd. g provide proper con- '8q/85 10-31-85 ~m. Riley Harrison,'1829 Car~., Accum. of debris,garbac~ .?'T~.'e¥~~ roll Ave. St. Paul 55104 ~'e ~--. - ~o~ containers," lU eays to remove debris ~ i~ get garbage containers re-roofing without pern ~ obtain permit inoperable Chevrolet Cenero 85/85 11-4-85 Mr.&Mrs. Paul...Mei. sel.,..5501 . Reroofing wit'hout permit 10 days to obtain Ba~tlett'Bl~d:.* ............ 2nd'structUre.on. p.rop~ty permit 86/85 11-8-85 Robert H. Kruse 2333 Fairview Automobile repair ser- cease and desist immed~/ vice from home i 87/85 11-20-85 Denis G. Halleron, 3179 Devon Boats, trailer i~ front Cease & desist parking .......... : ......................... yard &.constructing boats In front yd. & get~ · radio'to~er'~ithout per,it bldg.permit for rowe, Steven Coddon, P,O.Box 175, Mtka~Highlands. Hobi. le'* .... Can*'-t .replace trailers 88/85 11'22'851 Mound Home Parb . ~ !~ :c "~ :cc 12-19-85 Nick Johnson,lB5 Hound Ave'. t '~ewate ,///' 113 PAGE#,~ ~BER DATE ADDRESSED · · SUBJECT COHPLIANCE DATE ~h/85 6-20-85 Rainier Corp,, Pis..Coqnie. Ben 5014 through'5028 J Block off & discontinue nlngton, 1809 S'.Plymouth Rd. Shoreline Blvd. Apts. i use until fixed. Pipls., PiN. 55~q~ cc: Wanda balcony, decks deterioration McCuai ~,-~ ~' --~-' ~'~- ~'-'~l~-'d~'~'--~' cease Sus ~5---/~ 7-1--~- 5 ~5809 Granav~ew · Blvd. business in res.zone 30 days to get permits Fire damaged accessory for fire damaged bldg. building not repaired o remove d ~'6'/85 ' 7-1-85 Cari~ R. lianson, P.O. Box 1'8c.? 5'cj32 Beachwood Road Al iow insp. prior to 7/15 St. Paul HN. 55111 Bring request back'by ' 7-17-85 47/85 7-1-85' Jon Elam Lot splits & iot's'~f · . record , . 48/85 7-1-85 James Lassek, 2q31 Wilshire O~erat,ng auto repair, 30 days to cease .auto/boO Blvd. etc. in residential & repa,r $ remove oeor,s accumulation of debrls~ etc. 49/85 7-2-85 Robert 01son, qq2q Denbigh Expir~'~l Bldg. Permit Renew permit by 7-'15-85 or complete work & arran, Rd. final, inspection 50/85 ..... 7-8-85 Bradley R. & Lynett~ Johnson 638~ Lynwood Boulevard 2250 W. Grand Ave.,Long Lake, Sewer & Water lack'of HN. 55356 cc: Greg Skinner, stub-ins &'policy P:W'; 'City'pigr';& City Engr. 51/85 7/8/85 Pi/Pi Roger Kesteloot, 5342 Need re-inspection of 5 days (July 15, 1985) Piper Rd. addn. & permit pulled for sidin~l house I 52/~ 1-8-85 Pi/pi Richard Lee,. 50'73 Tuxedo Arrange re-inspection 30 days to comple'~e Blvd. : for garage, permit 6253 ,;rrange re-inspection & get permit for re- days to get permit for roofin~l house re-roofing house 3/85 7/1~/85 ~atricia E. 3~1y "' ~ence property line ~0 clays.. 4765 ,W i 1 sh i re' B 1.vd; -... d i s. pute 54/85 7-26-85 Rev. & Hrs. C. Lee~liuff Operating auto repair 30 days to cease~ & 'de'~ist ,i.2902 liazelwood'Road in r.~sidential or make arran~le.ments to 55/85 7-29-85 Kevin Norwood, 2521 Wilshire .... Tenants in R-I District Have tenants vacate · Blvd. · ............ premises by 8-,I-85 56/85 7-30-85' Richard Haley, 4574 Denbigh Remodel lng without 5 days to get permit ROadR. Pe rmi t 157/85 7-31--85 Jon . Nelson, 5429 Bartlett Oversized R.E. slain Reduce sign size .to 5 sq 58/85 7-31-85 Pi/pi:Gayle J. Schuffenhauer Exc. Hill without perm't I0 days to come & shov~ 6350 Rambler-Lane, Piound 6350 Rambler plan to repair/retainhl David. k. Spilseth, 3233 Casco Accumulation of debris 15-days to correct  8-6-85 · Circle, Wayzata 55391 at 4657 Manchester Rd. ~__ . cc: Tenant, 4657 Manchester _____.._.. --- -'~ ~'~ Debra Pi. ~~ Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct Brighton Blvd.. ... .. -61/85 8-12-85 Ambrose Schug ~; Katherine A. Encroaching garage in 180 days to remove; 15 Knott, 5222 Phelps Road deteriorating condition days to get demo permi Katherine A. Knott, Same address  8-1'6-85 Zeb Hanson, 2401 Chateau Ln. Accumulation of materia s rrect .debri. s & inoperable Veh - ' ....... cle~ 'etc; -'-'~:T~:~'~ Expired Temp.Cert. of 0:c./5 day to arrange rein I 6/4/85 8-16-85 Hussman Investment,31/40 liar- " ~' " fo bor. Lane, Mpls. 55441.6231 Deerwood Drive . 5 day to arran~le " I 65/85 8-29-85 Eric Bergland, 5138 Hanover 4972 Northern Rd. 15 days to correct cc_: R. H~m|noer. 4cj72 North~;rn Correction of dec~ work PAGE# I 1,3 2 ~IBER DATE ADDRESSED ' ' ' SUBJECT ....... ~ ~.uetPL lANCE DATE ]/85 /4-25'-85 Cur. tis A. Pearson ~/est Sub Properties - Check on filing of Agree. cc: Jori E lam ' Halstead Heights C6635 & if not recorded,proceed Bartlett Blvd.-cabin) With condemnation ~/85 4-25'85 Hr. & Hrs. Dan S. egner, 2260 :4578 Denbigh I~oad ' 30 days to sod/see¢' Bayview.Place,..~/ayzata..55391 Dirt washing dn. hrll construct retaining ,al1; ................. unto nei~lhbors* propert, ": ' -3/85 q-29-1~5 Am. Legion Post ;1~6, KOOC. ]0 days for haybales Shanley, Commander, 2333 14il- temporary signage shire Blvd.,. Hound ~.4/85' 5-3-85 Lo Shun..Lee,..7301. Lanham Ln. '21-~1 Basswood Lane 30 days to provide du p~_~-, .EdTna; 'HN. '55/435 .... . -' · ster with screening'A:i~,t~.' 25/8.5 5-3-85 H/H james R-,..Hagar,~lqOOq 2139 Basswood 'Lane 30'days. to provid~ dd~ Chestnut Dr....,.#..3, .Eden' ster with · Prairie,; 'HN; '5534~' ' ' scree 26/85 5-9-85 Kenneth F..Jeurlssen,, ~.r:t49...'Accumulation of debris 7 days to remove/c'or'rect Bedford'Road ............... ,"~0ch'as'tree h~ouse, etc. violation ~?/85 5-10-85 "Curt Pearson, IlO0 First Bk. Htka. Hobil Home Park at: ' ' Place ~/est, Hpls. 55402 6635 Bartlett Blvd. ......... Sent 'various letters ant forms to City Atto.rney 28/85 5-16-~J5 Jerry S. Pehrson, 5001 Crest.- Accumulation of debris 15. da,, t~l to correct ' - view Road, Hound +'unlicensed' 'Tl'ailer ;O~;:___,_~ !~/85 5-16-85 Clark Peters, 21/46 Noble Ln. Accumulation of debris 's to remove/c~orrect , ~0/85 5-16-85 Hr. Dayton Vi ]liamson, 2012 iAccumulation of debris 30 days to remove/correct Villa Lane + Junk vehic]es ~]/85 5-'17-85 Thompson Plbg. Co., 12201 2390 Avon Drive IO days to submit app. Hinnetonka Blvd., Htka..55343 No boiler permit for approval 12/85 5-20L85 Donald Olsen,..771..SanDiego 6385 Bartlett Blvd. 30 days to remove c~ Road; ee~kley~ 'CA'94707' ' 'PlO 23-1.17-2/4 32 0037 + neighbors beinj~ not~fie~d '3/85 5-2/4-85 Judith Harshik, 2066 Commerce Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove 4/85 5-31-85 John Babler, Jr., 2235 Lang- Operating Auto/Body 60 .days to cease .& _.~ don Lane . Repair in accessory bid I. desist. 35/85 6-4-85 T'homas V. E isler,.. 286'1. Phea'- Debris a'~' 'qTqb RichmOnd · days to~remove/~orre~ sant Ci rcle .&. Occupant, ../47.a~ ..Road Richmond Rd;" ' "* ' ' '.' ". ..... ~'6/85 6-4-8~' Richard Kryck, 59§6..Sunset RC...Debris & unli. cen'~'ed. /~,30 'days to remove & ........ vehicles'* · correct 37/85 6-4-&:~ Steven Shannon,SI62 Emerald Removal of encroachment Res. exp. I yr. from ..~..: .................. of pt. of acc. bldg. 7-24-8~ ...................... Per 'Res. 84-114 '--- 38/85 6-q-85 Vincent Forsman, 4857 Island Accumulation of _debris ~0 days to'"remove/correE View Drive ...... & inoperable/unlicensed ................. vehicles ~9/85 6-6-85 Aaron Appelqulst & Hary Trailer being lived in' 15 days to remove ' Pacholke,. 2624 ~/estedge Blvd. on..R-1 Property , ~0/85 6-14-M5 Gordo. ~'u,F, ;~61u ~1 iaar¢ nd. Incomplete Information. Submit by 6~?,-85 -- : submitted for variance ~~,-'~ -~ , on structural, al teratlo ~s fy ql/1~5 6-14-1~5 Kevin Norwood, 2521 ~/iis'hire Zoning Amendment Appl. Have until 6-19-85 to Blvd. (Accessory Apt.) request refund or r 'ncll will be asked to h~ ~ PH Harvin D. 14olte._q~j.f :~ne~ ~ncl ~/4j ~v~ ic/nurs[ Lane Remove ~tems you w~Sn t~- 42/~5' 6-14'-~5 Ave., Hpls. 55406 ..... i 1..Pr. op,to..be..clean up by keep by 6-21-85 · '. ........ l'court 'orde~ '. ......... ~ 43/85' 6-]4-85 R & R ~rgDe'~'ties, ~ RUss Fa]-I 2400 Commerce Blvd. ;" 'C'or'rect ~o days ness, o/UO Lynwood B]vd. · ! Body work & car repair no~ cars, · , SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE_~..~ ~BER DATE ADDRESSED ' ~ Alexander H01zer, H01zer Plbg Plbg. Registration & Heating, Navarre, MN. 55392' returned ~ :/85 1-25-85 Ken Nelson, 2620 Tyrone Lane Doing auto repair in Sent Home 0cc. Ord. accessory bldg. _.--- )/'7~ 1-25-~ ~,'a~-. Accumu at,on of ~ebri~ to correct veh. incl. coml. dum~ ...... . truck parked in res. ~/85 1-25-85 B.J.Malcheski, 5§2-01Bartlett 5862 Bartlett has 30 days to correct Blvd.'; Mound, MN. accum, of debris, veh. & deteriorated b~nv~ day~,pa remove barn needs removal l! 5/8~. 1-25-85 ~on Konek, 5120 Edgewater Dr, Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct .cc: ..(Owner) Cur~i..s..E...dohnsor ..& garbage; unlicensed p,O;BOx'246;S'rl_~Pk'5538q trailers ..... ~ 2-8-85 Alan Hofstadter, 5139 Woodlan, Compliance with Codes By after spring clean Road ..... up in May 7/85 2-8-85 M/M Mike Grove, 460~.Bedford Bidg.Permits expired compiete in.30 days & Road uncompleted items arrange re-lnsp. 3-29-~. 665/20 8/85 2-8-85 Walter Thomas,2400 Dupont S. Agreement ~e~. ~,~y . Mpls., MN. 55405 & West Suburban Prop. ' to remove struc. 7-1-~5 ~/85 ' 2-27-85 Tim White, P.O. Box 194, 2137 Centerview Lane 5 da~s to arrange to Excelsior, MN. 55331 Bldg. without permit; be put on C.C. agenda ....... '.. Needs'variance for resolve variance reques' ......................... What he's started  2-27-85 H/H Heyers,2620 Commerce Filing amended cond. Fileb~ 3-2p-iL5 Blvd.. ........ use permit .at 2620 c~O.i.~ ............................. C0n~nerce ?-28-8~--- Curt Pearson Atty.Ardery's letter & Agreement bet. City & West Sub. Prop. on Cabi~ on Trailer Pk. propert) 12/85 3-21-85 Robert Flemal, 1415 Westwood Wire fence not to code 5 days to remove fence Drive, Minnetrista 55364 & leaning. . - 3/85 4/1/85 M.L. Jackson .... Complaint: Debris in Debris:'~/1/~ I 5048 Edgewater Dr. his yard; unlicensed, Cars: 5/1/85 Mound..MN .55J64 : inoperable cars;Deter- Shed:. 6/1/~5 .~-- ~ - .... .-'" iorati~ --.~ 11'~85 4/4/8'---~ Frank Buysse.i 2009 & 2017 Commerce 30' days · 35~ ,Ivy Place Wayzata Bi_vd. dumpster encl. . ..... Orville Silseth ' comply with obtaining 3 115/ 4/4/85 ~107 Arnvle lane nermitR ' - 16/85 4-9-85 Ervin S~'Brethorst, P.O.Box 2140 Hickory Lane 30 days. I 58, Spring Park, MN. 55384 Accumulation of debris, .-. LP tanks & inoperable snowmobiles 17/85 .: 4-9-85 Michael Mittelstaedt, 214~ Accumulation of debr's 30 days Belmont vehicles & LP tanks, ~arba~e cans/no covers 18/85 4-10-85 Don D. Mcllree' Box 398, St. Tenant in Apt. 2 at 5 days to have tenant Bonifacius, MN,"55375 2152 Belmont Ln. has remove. · stuffed sofas & chairs ......................... in dumpster area - now I .......................... at'2153 Basswood 19/85 4-17-85 M/M Neii Schoenhofer, 6116 Accumulation of debris '30 days to cor'rect Bartlett Blvd. garbage cans & vehicle:: I I--~0/85 A-~q-RR ! Clarence Dewanz, 1742 Heron Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct I I ! no garbage cans & junk e~, u'-~. :. r' ~'~ ' I __ IUHBER DATE ADDRESSED ~ Page 14' ..... bUUJECT COHPLIANCE DATE ~ 1-5~ Dennis C. Otteson, Ottes~ Items on Temp. Cert. Homes', 27200 W. 6~nd St., .dated..3-30-83 not..com- Exc. HN. 55331 Cert.Mail pleted, .............. ~ 1--'~-t~--House of Moy~ ~55~ Shorel~ne~ .... equi. rements for.proposec Blvd., Mrs. Mo~, Mound "remodelingof'restaUrant ;~ 1-9-84 Dennis Oas, Jude Candy & Sprinkler System super- Get permits by 2-15--~ Tobacco Co., 3005 N. Niagara vised by remote station; and complete Work within Lane, Plymouth 55441 needs revisions; need 180 days. cc: Gerald E. Smith, S-O-S exits from basement area;. Printing, Westonka Sch. of. need air supply (furnaces 'Dance S F.D. & exhaust ventilation In rest rooms, etc. /84 1-11-84 Solar Resources Internatlona' Installation of solar 10 days to obtain permits ~ttn: Dave Bromley, 7603 Bmh equipment without permit~ .ake Rd., Edina, MN 55435 in City '-/~r~---~~odney E~ Duklet, 10000 3rd Expired Bldg. Permit 15 days to renew or ~ve. S., Bloomington'55420 '83~6206 arrange for final insp.'~ 1/84 1-26-84 Greg Hoseth, 1583 Gull Lane Remodeling without permit 5 days to comply/correc~ Wood burning appllance not etc. installed in proper manner. Need re-inspection of smo(e _____ alarm ..~ )---~'4'---~Walter Graham, Jr., 4520 No permit or insp. of Proceed immediately to Denbigh Rd. existing bldg. drains obtain permit S insp. of cc: Da]e Carlson Excavatin. connected to new system connections made at the · Plb9. ~nsp., interior of bld )/84 2-3-84 Alvin G. Quist, 4909 I.V. Accumulation of debris & 30 days to remove and Drive vehicles on vacant lot on correct. Wilshire(24-117-24 14 0051 1/84 2-6-84 Richard Ash, 3068 Brighton Advertising sign in R-3 30 days to remove & Blvd. & unlicensed cars, etc. correct -- on premises ~ 2-6-84 Frank Buysse, 3545 Ivy Pl. Discussion on apt. com- Comp lance dates - Wayzata 55391 plexes at 2009 & 2017 various to 6-15-84 Commerce Blvd. 3/84 2-10-84 James C. Hendrlcks, 3006 Expired Bldg. Permit 5957 15 days to renew or Westedge Blvd. arrange for final inst. 'i~/8~ 2-10-8q Edvardo Oabrowski, 2545 Expired Bldg. Permit 6157 .15 days to renew or - Pilgrim Lane N., Mpls. 55441 arrange for final insp. 15/8~ 2-16-84 Randy Saba, 2348 Commerce Filling lot without permit Permit to be obtained & .......... '.' .'..' .' . grading plan to be sub- mitted. .[.6/8~, 2-16-84. Vic Carlson & Sons, 2246 Fllling & grading lot 10 days to submit plan Edgewater'Ave~,'MPls''55421; 'without permit obtain permit. i7/84 2-17-84 Desyl Peterson Memo requesting warning (~ ~//~.~-/oC,~7/ - notice be sent for clean- ' ............. up'of'property 2301 Falrv ew Lane i'8/8q 2-28-84 J.p. Oberman, 3130 West- Public nuisance - dog 5 days from receipt of - edge..BlYd .......................... kennel & accumulation letter to clean yard, etc ................. of.feces.. 9/84 3-5-84 Rainier Company,12~50 Way- Apt. Bldg. lnspection 30 days to correct - zata Blvd. # 300, Mpls. 5000,501465026 Shoreline MN. 55343 ' " 0/84 3-12-8q John R. Drews, 2337 Wi1- Conditional use for i15 days to comply with - shire Blvd. Coml. Rec. Facility Item 7 (Stairway removal 1/S4~-l~-R& n .... ~ o ....... ~.~,., .... i ....... rson, 4344 IDS 2925 Holt Lane - Fritz Johnson - · PAGE 15 ~BER DATE ' "ADDRESSED "SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE . 2/84 3-15-84 Robert B-lix, 5028 Woodrldge Siding house without ] .10 days to get permit Road permit 3/84 3-15-~q Ouane Skochenski, Ouane's wasm oil Heater I~ days to remove Phililps "66" Service, 2603 unapproved Commerce Blvd'. .__. 3-22-84 Curt-is L. Johnson,P.O.Box 24~ Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove Spring Park, MN. 55384 etc. at 5120 Edgewater -comply cc: Tenant at 5120 E.d~ewater Drive 5/8q 3-2~8-84 Owners-Multi.pie Residences Multiple Residence July 1, 1984 compliance ~'Q See Apt. Owners file Units Precollection date· Storage 6/84 3-29-84 Roger Rager, 1645 Gull Lane Three P~ints Tavern 4-15-84' to bring in info. MOund ~ 5098 Three Points Blvd on the proposed improve- ' n~nts, etc. :7/84 3-30-84 Desyl Peterson 3OI5 Drury Lane, M/M Be~ Oeterin~ uncompleted pr.>ject ~8/84 4-3-~q Shields Printing Co. Needs Cond. Use for Get app. in before 5-1-~ 2271 Commerce Blvd. Attn. M~r.Print Shop' in B-1 ~5/8q ~-3~84 Frana & Sons, Inc. Final bn Bldg. Permit~l~ ~~.. cc: ~d Kodet, Spaulding .Engr. 6383 for 2461 Commerce & John Rocheford 30/84 4-5-84 Desyl Peterson Abandoned/uncompleted .. Permi. t 5592..for 5881- '- BeaChwoOd'ROad ....... 3-~"Z~q~Wm. R. Harrison, 7~Halsteac Accumulation of debris 30 days to clean up Av., Mound & unllcensed boat & ...'"" "~ cc: Vera Mack trailer 4-~-84 M/M Marv. in Smith, 5467 3 Pts Bldg. without permit 5 days to get permit' · '32/b~ Blvd. ' 33/84 4-5-84 Teri Homes, 1510 Stoughton Av. Lots 11 & 12,Blk. 27, 30 days to correct Chaska, MN 55318 5eton(27XX Tyrone Lane) Scc: Imker Hill undercut 34/84 4-12-84 M/M Richard Baanrud, 3135 Ayr Reminder 6-1-84 date Lane,'Mound, MN. 55364 for compliance coming P 35/84 4-12-84 M/M Michael Gray, 4852 Glas- Remodeling without pen,it 5 days to get perml gow Rd I36/84 4-12-84 M/M Donald Gilmore, 4416 Lam- Reminder 6-1-84 date i~ berton Road coming up for compliance on ~ ~ unlicensed/inoperable ~eh. ' 38/84 4-1'3-~4 Gladys..~ohnson,.-301-8 tsland ..... ..Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/corre Vie~:Drive, Mound's55364 ....... Unllcensed snowmobile 37/84 4-13-84 M/M Burr Linqulst, 4875 Edge- Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/corr~ ware r..Dr lye ........................... un 1 i censed/i noperab 1 e · I ' " . ....................... trailers 35/84 4-13-84 M/M Tom Roden, 3006 l.V.Drive Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/corr, ............................. &.unlicensed/inoperable 'VehiCles . 1 ~4-13-84 James Willer, Mgr., V.F.W. Viol. of storage & sale 30 days to remove/corr~ 2544 Commerce Blvd., Mound of wood on lot next to VFW; also debris accum.' --4~~ John Ericson, 1 20 Shadywood Landlocked parcel PID Rd., Wayzata 553~1 23-117-24 23 0007 to be ~ combined~With One frontin~ on Westedge 42/84 ,4-17-84 =Rlchard..DeWitt, 4516 Bedford Violation Chap.70 of UB;ion Rd./scc:-David Griffin drainage of water & problems. : , PAGE HBER DATE ..... ADDRESSED ' ' SUBJECT' ' ~~ .bUffiFLIAN~E DATE q3/84 4-23-84 H/H Paul Villette, 1720 Avoce, Accumulation of debrisJ '7 days to correct · Lane · --2~"/~'J~7'~ M M Dave oman, ateau $ unlicensed trailer Ln. cc:.Harold D. Albrecht, ~~move 2300 Chateau ~n. --~~~ E. Johnson, ~ Accumula~ 30 days to remove Ave. S., St. Louis Pk. 55426 in fire lane & Betty E. Sather~ 3090 N. __________ Shore Dr., Wayzata, MN. 55391 ~ 5-11-84 Dennis Heckes, 322~' Tuxedo ~a-~get ~ Blvd. nstalllng fence w~th -1~ 5-~- M M Leo M. T ibodeau, 59 1 no permit incorrectly also fence to be corrected ] 841 Hillcrest'ed; Hound Accumu atlon o debr,s 30 days to remove-c0-rLLLY 48/8~ 5-1 - James E. Viller, P.O. Box 11 Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/cor,~ct Mound (4955'.Donald Drive) ~9/8~ 5-1~-84 Guardian of Esther E. Jacobs Accumulation of debris .30 days to remove/correct 5465 Bartlett BlVd. unlicensed vehicle, etc 50/84 5~-84 E..L. Longley, P.O. 223, Moun( Accumulation of debris 60 days to comply . (5227 Phelps Rd.) 51/84 5-17-8~ M/M Leon'A. Heller, 7525. Accumulation of debris 30 days to clean up Harol~ Ave..,' Golden Val. ley 55,.27 52/84 5-17-84 Donald O. Riis, 1625 Eagle Ln Accum. of debris & 30 days to remove/correct Junk Cars 53/84 5-17-84 ~alter Guthrie, 2142 Belmont Zoning violation of Cease work on vehicles Lane'Apt;'#'3, Mound ' home occ.- doing auto repair . 5-~~ Dean Hunter, ~ AC.~um. o cle~i~ .... 30 d'~'--~"~ys to ~emov~ 55--~~ v~n . u~st., san Inoperable/unlicensed c~rs '' ~ View Drive Reminder to ~emove itens per 2-3-84 letter PID 24-117-24 14 0051 (Lot on ~ilshi're) Date a reed upon ~ 5-18-84 M/H Dean Hunter, 5043 Tuxedo Accumulation of debris 30 days to~ & unlicensed/inoperable aut~ 57/84 5-24-84 Chester Stuteville, 4878 Unauthorized constructic~ 10 Days Edge~a.ter..D~.'i ye ..... ' 5-~'-~ Desyl Peterson 1 ~Teri H----~omes re: 27XX Tyr(~ne Refarred t'~o City Arty 2 Gladys Johnson, 3018 I. I.Dr. for warning notice of - 3 Richard Janke, 5909 Gler~wOod pending prosecution ................. re:' Accum.. of debris, el:c. 59/84 6-12-84 Ron Gehring, 3215 Cha*rles Ln. Recorded covenants,cond 15 'days to file with City S restrictions filed on Clerk .... ' ..... · twinhomes-~737&4743 Dor~hester~.~.~L~_-L~ ~c. " 2851,2857,286362869 Tuxedo ~ 60/84 6-12-84 Arnold Heiserich,1801 Quebec Fence installed withou 10 days to get permit & Ay., Golden Valley, 55427. permit, building wire then call for final insp. / ?~ O-~r~h~ , not permitted material when fence corrected. ,1/84 6-13~84 M/M Lon D. Hol 1584 Finct Accumulation of Debris 15 days to correct & get g No 9arbage cans 9arbage containers i2/84 6-13-84.. Mrs .... Geo...Cole,.2162 Center- Adverlsing Home Occ. 5 days to remove sign · .. vle~ Lane. - ........... with sign i3/8q 6-1q-~q Dr. Robert Griffith, Box lq7 '1708 Avocet Lane, adding 10 days to ge' Vatertown, MN. 55388 enclosed porch no pern'it permit ... ~4/84 6-14-84 M/M Daniel Christianson, 4724 Grading yard/no frost 30 days to correct iHanover Road C..~. ' protection east wall ~,' ~5/84 6-15-84 Paul vogt, P.O.Box 64, Long Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct Lake, MN. 55356 unlicensed vehicles,et,:. 6/~4 6-15-84 William Petron & Sally Woodro~ Accumulation o~ d~hri~ ~ ~ .... + ys correct ~,.~ 6749 Cypress Dr., Central Point 2434 Commerce Blvd. / ~BER DATE .... i"ADDRESSED '' SUBJECT ' " COHPL'IANCE DATE ~7/84 $-15-84 Kenneth Ketchum/Betty Ketchuff 166~ Finch Lane J :30 day to correct'-' ' 5665 Lyn.wood.Bl-vd.-Apt;- 306 · Accum'. 'of' debris S I~I~ inoperable sn0wmobile 8/8 6-15-84 M/M..John Eyres, 2335 Inde- 4713 Wi lshire Blvd. 15 days to correct. ~endence Rd., Maple Plaln 5535~) Debris accumulation ~. no garbage cans I9/84 6-15-84 Nicholas Espi~ritu, 1638 Eagle Bldg. remodeling withcut I0 days to get permit .......... permi t · (bay-wi ndow) r0/84 6.19_84 Jacci Segner, '2260 Bayvlew.' Expired Demolition Pert it 5 days 'to know in- Place, Wayzata,'HN. ~5391 62h8 on garage on Lot 1 tentions on matter ~ · B]k. 3, Avalon I1/84 6-21-84 .Dean. LaForest,..4920 W'i. lshire -Blue.Capri on lot acros: . 10 days, to remove ........................ st; 'un1 icensed/inoperable' .xt~t.,,,~"~. I ~T' ~ T_honLas D. ,Green, ~ 1584 Finch Lane, Accumu- 15 days to correct ; ~ '7-1~-?¥ ~oo~'~' lation of debris 73 4 6-27-84 Susan Lowe, 50!4 Shoreline Inspection of apt. veri':y Correct and improve Blvd., Apt. 2 water standing on carpe & drainage on site by sheetrock wet owner, Rainier Corp.~ 74/84 .7/6/8q Hichael Banecki bldg. Without permit. 4760 Bedford Road debris, wetland filling 30 days wiring vlol.ation 10 days to apply 75/84 7/6/84 New Horizon Day' Care sign permit' ..30 days to complete 2900 High]and Blvd. 76/84 7-10-84 DoUg]as H0odie~ 4916 Edgewatel Remove sheetrock for Aug. 1, 1984 to comply Drive framing/insulation insp cc: Curt. Hagfors, 4360 6t.h submit energy cal.; pro~ide Ay. N., Long Lake 55356 access & ventilation to · . '" '-: ....... basement; obtain elec.p~;rmlt I 77/'e~ 7/10/84 Curt Pearson, City Atty. Investigative report .... on. 2631 Commerce Blvd. '-78/84 7/11/~q Veterans Admin. Guarantee 5656 Bartlett Blvd; L5 days to let me know Division, Federal Bldg., Attn House in disrepair intention to correct Dennis Johnson, Fort Snelling deficiencies 79/84 7-11-84 Father &'Son Cons:ruction, 395a John C.ampbell Residence 30 days~.to cqrrect 28th Ave. S., Mpls, MN. 55406 Leaking roof, etc. ~.~1~, ~.~..~~ Attn: Scott Torbo cc: Campbel s, 5341 Baywood Shores O'. I 80/84 7-13-84 ,.R. oger A. & Betty J. Drews,5646 50~ Three. Points Blvd. Debris - I:>-'oays "W 'Hearn Glendale Ariz.85306 Accum. of debris & gas tank removal - 30 days 60 days to remove I81/8/4 7-13-84 Hrs. George Levy, .3216..Drew Av. 2624 Westedge Blvd. . N., MR1s.,'MN''55422 ....... Accum. of debris & vehi,',le~  82/84 7-17-84 Brigitte, Inc., 426 Lake St.-, .... 4[~91 ..Edgewater Drive 30 days to remove Excelsioi', MN. 55331 Accumulation'of'debriS ......  -.83/84 7-17-84 Judy Kvalsten, 5125 Windsor Rd'. Swimming pool over 2 ft: 5 days to. reduce water deep unf, enced depth or apply for var I 84/84 7-17-84 garren B. Davidson/Janice Vetsc~ 4625 Lakeside Lane 30 days 1~o remove/corr 301 5. Pine~ Waconia~ MN. 55384 Accumulation of debris 85/84 7-17-84 Lawrence L. Vance M/M, 3017 Accumulatlon of car 30 days to remove/corr Brighton Blvd. parts, debris &.inoper- ' 'able&unllcensed cars ...... 8i 7-17-84 Maurice Johnson, 6021 Chestnut reroofing & siding 10 days'to obtain/ Rd. 'house - no permit I 87/84 7-16-84 M/M Brian .Follese,..5182 W,. .... 1.743 Wildhurst Lane 10 days to fence~ Broadway ................. Unfenced excavation 30 days to level ~Ot,-e I 88/84 7-1~-~4 Norton G. Tucker, 35~.Hugo-.St .. 1.720..Finch..Lane . .. 15 days to arrange re- Fridley 55432 cc:Thomas 'Leuchl enberg inspec'tlon I 89/84, 8-9-84 John ~/hitman, bU28 Enchant'ed Fd.' Ken_tel d?c_ks in ~,~'~/ ~,~_ ~ ..... t, , - .(/ .... resldential. ER DATE'"*"ADDRESSED. SUBJECT , COHPL'IANCE DATE ,o ~/84 8-20-84 David W. & Margaret Griffin Garage not completed ] ~30 days to complete. ~ ~' ~.~ ~, , . . .... , .... . '- . ..:- · ....... - -. ..... · . : arrange re-inspection. /~q ~-20-~q Patcicia ROse, 6000 Aspen Rd. Rentjn9 port.ion of dw9. 10 days to provide insp.~ :/84 8-20-84 Gertrude Shellum, 4613 Tuxedo " " " 1.0 days to provide insp.~ -~q .9-1u-uq Jon R. Nelson,' 5429 Barttett Rental property not Blvd, . being Fented; .struc.' changes required, to ...... discontinue'as"multi?'e dwg.(4 unit bldg.) 4-84 9-19-~q Patricia Jean Swift, 1867 E. 1559 Bluebird Lane I0 days to correct and 38th St., MPLS., MN. 55406 secure' fr~m uncontrolled~-' Cert. Mal access 5/84 9-25~84 Dave Spilseth, 3233 Casco Accumulation of debris 15 days'to remove end/or · Cir~le~'Wayzata,.MN. 55391 'at'4657 Manchester Rd. ~orrect ~6/84 9-25-84 Gawel & Knaeble Contractors, Expired Bldg. Permit 15 days to.get flnal. Inc., 2422 Washington St.N,.E, 302'1Devo~ Lane renew permit Mpls'., MN;~55~18 ........... " ..... 7?84 9-25-84 James Lassek',. 2431Wilshire Home occ. 23.302(54)~& - Blvd; ..... · Derelict autos 46.44. 18/84 9-25-84 Rev. & Mrs. C. Lee'Huff ' Home occ.& derelict"& · 2902 Hazelwood Road unlicensed motor vehicles .~" 19/84 9-28-8~ Kenneth E..Jeurissen, ~949 Accum. of debris, etc./~ 3~ days ~.qorr~e. ct Bedford., Road ' ' ~1'~C~_.'. ~f~/~; ' )0/84 '!0-4-84 Clifford Swank, 1440 Halgren Accum. of ~'ebrls.& Junk ~ ~30 days'to correct · . Rd.., Maple Plain, MN. 55359. .cars.on vacant lot behlrld" ' cc': Dan $icheneder, 1733 Sh°'ewood Lane 1743 S'horewcod Ln. ~1/84 10-9-84 Louis R. King, 587'5 Bartlett Bldg. Permit 6420 expired: '15 days to get permit Blvd., Mound screened porch not start,d '~ 02/84 10-10-84 Richard Mccurdy, 5330 Three Roofing without permit IU ~ays to get permit Points Blvd. 103/8! 10-!0-84 'J. E. Foote, 5958 Hawthorne Rd Installing fence with 15 day~oget out permit ~(l:- ~w:u~ ~.- 104/8z 10-10-84 Barbara Timmons, 5011Rosedale Bldg. Permit expired;. 15 dayS to correct.& Road no final cal~ed.for call for final & correct chimney height 105/8! 10-11-84 Wm. "Frenchy" Dampier, 4853 Remodeling without per- . 10 days'to get permit Island V'iew Dr. mit/cease S desist work O~0-~-~'.L~. 106/8~ 10-12-84 Michael J. Byrne,'V.Pres.., Letter of Credit 100984 CorrectV&)return. State Bank of Long Lake, Long Lost Lake Addn. Lake, MN. 55356 ........ Account of'Jellico 107/8~!0-16-~q M~.&Mrs. Matt L. Ruppert, gxpirea ulag.rermit ~ - 4448 Manchester Rd. Need Final Htg..Insp. ~-0~*,~~ [OS/Sz 10-19-84 Allen Shay., 5348..Lynwood..BlYd ..Gas.piping for pool T? days to 9Uet ~ermit ........ ' .............. heater ~'no'permit~ . 109/8~ 10-26-84 Richard &.Barbara Ash, 3068 Accum. of debris 30 days to correct Bri~ht~n Blvd. .. ,._ .i.10/~4'10-29-8~ Jane Foote, 5958 Hawthorne Re. Permit 6740 to erect .: fence.& tie into , .. neighbor's'fence- :... ~.- 111/1~4 10-30-8~ Paul A. Henry, 5056 Sulgrove Expired Bldg. Pe'~mits ~Complete in 30 days or Road #4668 &#6316 ....... 9et'hew'permit for work 112/~4 10-30-84: Scott Berglund, 4556 I.V.Dr. Expired Bldg. Permit Remove sheetrock for new owner framln9 insp. in 10 days_ 113/~4 11-1-84 David Ziskln, 4801..l.V.Dri. ve. 3068 Brighton Blvd. '5 days ~o clAan up ............... Accumulation of debris 114/84 11-1-8~ Richard Heggemeyer,220 W. 9~t~ Dir~ &-debris in st. 5 days to clean street St., Bloomi. ngton. 55420 Beachw~od Rd. by Lang. ~r City wil~>.do & bill .... don View Subd. - 115/84 ll-5-84LRoger Hill, 6300 Linden Lane Bidg. Permits 6326,5443, _ _ ' & 6013 I 30 days to complete or get new permit BER DATE .... ADDRESSED ' SLBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE 6/84 !1-t6-84 Donald R. Phillips, 3021Hig~- Reroof~ng without J ~10 days to get permit I. land Blyd; per.mit. 17/84 ll-g'r-§4 Crane Bodine, 6142 Attic Way Accumulation of debris I0 days to remove or ~'~ I%~,.,j~b Edlna, MN. 55436 ' at 5025 Wren Rd. correct 18/~.~ 11~2~-64 Letters to: Lo Shun Lee 2131 Basswood Lane-re:- dumpsters Phillip LittlefielJ 21q2 Belmont Lane Don McElree 2152 BElmont '~~ James O'Connell 2145 Basswood ",,,- James Hagar '- 213~ Basswood "~ Danny Peterson 2161 Basswood ,, cc: Blackowiak' & Son 12-3-~q Richard E. Johnson, ~255 Semi-trailers parked 10 days tfl5 call to work r 1~/84 Indian Hills Rd.,..Maple.-Plai~, on his off of out time frame prop. agreeable 5535~ .~ ............... Marion & Auditor's Rd. to remove I 20/84 12-11-84 James Kruse, 2830 Pine Road' Expired..bldg..Pe~mit ......... '.5-.days to sched, tinal No'final'inspection ........ 121/84 12-11-84 (evin F. McKeever, 262~ Sette Expired Bldg. Permit 15 days to get permit Clrcle Install Stove & Chimmy and arrange progress · without .permit inspection. 1 ~22/84 12-21-84 Roger.Woodruff, 4870 Edgewater Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove )r. ...... + garbage containers 123/84 12-21-84 Steven'Darling, q874 Edge~ater Accumulation of debris 5 days + coyer for. garbage -. . containers 124/84 ~2-21-84 Charles Stuteville, 4878 Edge ACcumulation, misc. 30 days to Correct water Drive· + need garbage , 125~ Lq 12-24-84 Nell Froeming, 4866 Edgewater Temp. pi as tic lean-to Correct by spring of 85 I_.1 1~6~ ' Provldegarba e cans L I:~ John W. Sima~, ~ Ma~c~' Accumulation o~ aeor~s ---~c~ Rd. at 4630; no garbage ca~s - cc: Owner, Gary 01son, 5721 23rd Av,S.; Mp~s,'55417 127/84 12-27-84 Alan Hofstadler, 513~ Woodlard Accumulation of debt's 30 d~ys. to correFt , ~ Road no garbage containers & b~e~'~' tree house not allowed ~_~Z/gi~..C- ~- inoperable/unlicensed ~oat 128/84 12-27-84 Charles W. Childs, ~425 Rad- Accumulation of debris 15 da~s to correct nor Rd., Mound inoperable/unlicensed ~~~./ van truck, no cover on garbage containers  12~/84 12-27-84 Wm. Bull, 1616 Finch Lane Accumulation of debris ~0 days to correct_ OLD ORDINANCE CITY OF HOUND Recreation Equipment - Play apparatus such as swing sets.and slides, sandboxes, poles for nets, unoccupied boats and trailers not exceeding L~venty feet In length, picnic tables, lawn chairs, barbecue stands, and ..similar equ. lpment br structures but not !ncludlng tree houses, swimming pools, play houses exceeding ~venty-five square feet of floor area, or sheds utl!lzed for storage of equipment. 23.702 Exterior Storage_ In residential distrlcts,~all materials and equipment shall be stored within a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties, except for the following: laundry drying and're.cr, eatlonal equipment, construction an~).'landscaping'materials and equipment c~.'rrenl:ly (within a period of thlr~y-six {36) hours) being used on.'the, pr,e/~lses~ off-street, parking of licensed and operative passenger automobites and~..:-.-' pick-up trucks. Boats and 'unoccupied trailers are permlsslble if stored in the rear yard more than ten (10) feet from the property line. Existing uses shall corn. ply with this provision within twel.ve (12) months following enactme'n: of this Ordinance. In al!' districts, the C extermor storage if it iTM may require a Conditional Use .Permit for any s demonstrated that such storage ~s a hazard to the publlc health, safety, convenience, morals, or has'a depreciating effect upon nearby property values, or impairs scenic views, or con- stitutes threat to living amenities. ORDINANCE RO. ~88 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23 OF THE CITY CODE, SECTION 23.301 (92) DEFINITION OF RECREATION EQUIPHENT AND SECTION 23.?02 RELATING EXTEKIOK ~TOKAGE TO THE CITY OF HOUND DOES ORDAIN= Section 23.301 (92), relating to the definition of .R.eoreation Equipment" is amended to read as follows: (92) Recreation Equipment- Play apparatus such as swinf sets and slides, sandboxes, poles for nets, picnic tables, lawn chairs, barbecue stands, and similar equipment or structures but not including tree houses, swimming pools,, play houses exceeding twenty-five square feet of floor area, or sheds utilized for storage of equipment. Recreation equipment shall also include recreation vehi=les not exceeding thirty (30) feet in length lnoluding bu~ no~ limited to boats~ boa~ travel trailers and self-oon~ained motor trailers, homes. Section 23.702, Exterior Storage, 'is amended to rear as follows: Exterior Storage In residential equipment shall 23:702 districts, all materials and be stored within a buildin~ or fully' screened so as not to be visible rom adjoining properties, except for the following: laundry drying and recreational equipment, see definition ¢q2), construction and landscaping materials and equipment currently (within a 'period of thirty-six (36) hours) being used on the premises, off-street parking of licensed and operative passenger automobiles and pick-up trucks. Storage of recreational vehicles including but not limited to boats, boat trailers, travel trailers and self-contained motor homes is permissable subject to the following conditions: Such equipment sha~l be stored on private property in yard areas excluding the front yard setback area. 2. Stored equipment shall be registered to, leased to or rented to the owner or renter of the property. 3. Stored equipment shall be limited to than.four (4) recreational vehicle~. no more Stored equipment shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in length. Existing uses shall comply with this provision within twelve (12) months following enactment of this Ordinance. In all districts, the City may require~ a Conditional Use Permit for any exterior storage if it is demonstrated that such storage is a hazard to the public health, safety, convenience, morals, or has- a depreciating effect upon nearby proper.~ values, or impairs scenic views, or constitutes threat to living amenitie, s .... lta~or ATTEST: City Clerk Adopted by the City Council August 12, 1986 Published in The Laker, September 2, 1986 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MinneSota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: City Council and Staf~ FROM: Mark Koegler, City Plannar. ~ DATE: September 9, 1986 SUBJECT: Recreational Vehicle Storage ' In order to determine how other communities regulate recreational vehicle storage, I contacted the cities of Shorewood, Tonka Bay, Orono, Wayzata, Minnetrista, Chanhassen and White Bear Lake. Copies of the ordinances for Oroao and Chanhassen are enclosed. The following is a summary of the findings: .. Tonka Bay - Tonka Bay requires that all recreational vehicles be c, urren~y licensed. Properly licensed vehicles can be stored anywhere on the property, provided an .e~ foot se*_hack is observed from all public right-~f-w~ All n~licensed vehicles ar~ r~zo'ved under the city's abaSd~ed vehicle o~di~ance. Tonka Bay i~tdica~ed that they receive numerous complaints about boat storage. Shorewood - Shorewood recently apDroved an ordinance requiring that recreational vehicles be stored within the buildable area of a lot with two except io~s'. 1. Storage is allowed within five ~.eeh nE hh~. property line in side and rear yards. 2. One piece of recreational equipm-=ah ts allowed to be stored in the ~ ' driveway of a re~ide,~h[al lot providing that a 15 foot setback is al)served from the paved portion of the pu~. lic street. ::~.~[h~. Bear Lake - White Bear Lake requires ~hat all recreational equipment be stored in side or rear yards. Wayzata - Wayzata cont=ols recreational vehicles through its o~f-shreet parking requirements. Boats, travel trailers, motor h~es a,l:] ~.[.~h ~)u~-~-~'~ c~ no~ b~. shoce~ ~,3re than 72 hours on a piece of pro[:e_rty unless plac.~d within a side or teac yard. -Chanhassen - Chanhasse. n is c.~a.~idering an ordinance ceguiring storage in rear or side yards, behind the. front yard setback line. The ordinance limits the number oE vehicles to two for lots less tll~.~ one acre in size. Orono - Orono allows stocage of c~.creational equipment less than 20 feet h~ ~ in rear yards providing that a 10 foot setback is observed fr(~m all prope, rty lines. Recreational eguipmeat la_~..~ tl~an 20 feet in length must be stored within a buildin~ or fully screened. ... Minnetrista - Minnetrista imposes t~o .~ets of standards, one Eoc "rural" lots and the other for "urban" lots. Within ~he' urban area which includes 75% of . Minnetrista's housing units, boats, t,milers an~ snowmobiles can be stored in' front yards providing that they are surrounded by five to six foot high screening. Recreational vehicles can also be stored in rear yards without screening. In the rural area, equi[~menb can be stored subject to front, sid~ ad rear setback provisions. ~- .. Orono 10.60 odorous or solid matter of such quality and quantity as to be readily detectable at any' point beyond the lot line of the site on which the use is located. Subd. 7. Vibr,~tion. Any use creating periodic earth- shaking vibrations, such las may be created from a drop forge shall be prohibited if such vibrations are perceptible beyond the lot line of the site on which the use is located. The standard shall not apply to vibrations created during the process of construction. Subd. 8. Glare or Heat. Any use requiring an operation producing an intense heat or light transmission shall be performed with the necessary shielding to prevent such heat or light from being detectable at the lot line of the site on which the use is located. Lighting in all instances shall be diffused or directed away from "R" Districts and public streets. Subd. 9. Explosives.' Any use requiring the storage, utilization or manufacturing of products which could decompose by detonation shall be located not less than 400..-feet from any District line. Subd. required in residential zones where: 10. Screening Required. Screening shall be -A. Any off-street parking than four parking spaces and is within residential lot line, and, area which contains more 30 feet of an adjoining B.. Where the driveway to' a parking area of more than six parking spaces is within 15 feet of an adjoining residential lot line. Subd. 11. Screening, Type of. The screening required herein shall consist of a solid fence or wall at least 50% open, not less than four feet nor more than five feet in. height but shall not extend within 15 feet of any street or driveway opening onto a street. The screening shall be placed along the'property lines or in case of screening along a street, 15 feet from the street right- of-way with landscaping (treed, Shrubs, grass and other planting) between the screening and the pavement. A louvered fence shall be considered solid if it blocks direct vision. Planting of. a type approved by the Planning Commission may also be required in addition to, or in lieu of, fencing. Subd. 12. Maintenance. In all districts, all structures, required landscaping and fences shall be mainta'ined so as not to be unsightly or present harmful health or safety conditions. Subd. 13. Exterior Storage in "R" Districts. In all "R" Districts, all mobile materials and equipment shall be stored ORONO CC 378 (4-1-84) ~ 10. ~0~'~ within a building .or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties, except boats and unoccupied trailers less than 20 feet in length, which are not stored for commercial purposes, if stored to the rear of the house an~ a distance of 10 feet or more from any property line. Source: Ordinance no. 172 ......... ' .... .~- ~... . - .~ .~ Effective Date: 1-1-75 ..... Subd. 14. Waste Materials. Waste material shall not be · washed into the public storm sewer system nor the sanitary sewer system without first having received a permit fo..do so from the City.- 'If said permit is not granted, a method of disposal, shall be devised which will not require continuous land requisition for permanent operation and will not cause a detrimental effect to the adjacent land. Should the waste be of solid form rathe~ than fluid, the storage area shall be so located and fenced as to be removed from public view. In all districts, all waste material, debris, refuse, garbage, materials not currently in use for construction or otherwise regulated herein shall be kept in an enclosed building or properly contained in a closed container for such purposes. The owner of vacant land shall be responsible for keeping such vacant land free of waste material and noxious weeds. · Subd. 15. Drainage. No land shall be developed and n use shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing~'' flooding, or erosion'on adjacent properties. Such runoff shall he properly channeled into a storm drain, water course, pending area or other suitable facility. Subd. 16. Traffic Control. The traffic generate4 by any use shall be channelized and controlled in a manner that will avoid congestion on public streets, safety hazards, or excessive traffic ~hrough residential'streets. Vehicles backing from a parkihg space shall not back into the public street. No access-drive to any lot shall be located within 20 feet of any two intersecting street right-of-way iine~. .......... Subd. 17. Radiation, Etc. No activities .shall be permitted that emit dangerous radio activity beyond enclosed areas. There shall be. no electrical disturbance adversely affecting the operation of any point of any equipment including but not limited to radio and television reception other than that of the creator of the disturbance. SEC. 10.61. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. Subd. 1 Sign~ a.s Accessory Us.e. Signs are a permitted accessory use in all districts sub3ect to the followiD- regulations: f <3 O ONO CC 379 ¢4-1-8,) Chanhassen (proposed) -- 6-1&-& Swtngs, sZtdes and-other' play equipment. 6-16-5 6-1&-6 Outdoor furniture. Wood for burnin8 in a as follows:' fi'replace, stove or furnace provided it is stored A. In a neat and secure stack. B. It is not within five feet of a property line; ': ............ - .... .~- C. The wood stack is not infected or inl~abtted with 'r'0de-nts. SECTION 15. STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES: ",':'.,i ~.-: -' :.'' ..' ?. Recreational vehicles may be parked or stored in a residential or a~rtcultural district provided the following conditions are met: 6-15-1 No more than two (2) recreational vehicles may be parked or stored outside on a residential lot less than one acre in size. No more than four (&) recrea- tional vehicles may be parked or stored outside on a residential lot one acre or larser in size providing that at least two (2) of these recreational ' vehicles are completely screened from view Er.om public streets or adjacent property. Additional recreational vehicles may be kept within an enclosed structure which otherwise conforms to the zoning requirements of the district. 6-15-2 ~ecreational vehicles must be maintained in a clean, "well-kept~ operable ' condition. ' '- 6-.15-3 Recreational vehicles shall be mobile and shall not be permanently affixed in the ground in a manner that would prevent removal 6-15-6 6-15-5 6-1.5-6 Recreational vehicles may be parked or stored only on the rear or side yard behind the required front yard setback. The parkin~ or storage of recreational vehicles on the rear or side yard, as permitted herein, may be on surfaced or unsurfaced areas. ,.. Recreational vehicles may be stored on a lot withou~'re~ard co the location on the lot for the sole and express purpose of loading and unloading for a period not to exceed twenty-four (2t) hours .... Unmounted side-in pickup campers, must be stored no higher than t~enty inches (20") above the ground and must be securely, supported at least' at four (&) corners by solid support blocks or support mechanisms. 6-15-7 6-15-8 Recreational vehicles may not be occupied or used for living, sleeptng:.or housekeepinE purposes while parked or stored. Except for routine maintenance or durin§ emergency conditions when power supply is disrupted, the operation of a recreational vehicle po~er generator plant shall not be permitted in residential districts. Routine maintenance periods shall not exceed sixty (60) minutes per month. -77- ~~ McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55441 612/559-3700 1-800328-8322 Ext. 784 April 6, 1987 Engineer~ Planners Surveyors Mr. Edward 3. Shukle, gr. City Manager City.of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBdECT: Hennepin County Road No. 15 144A ~8087 DealEd: As you are aware, we have received from Hennepin County a copy of the preliminary construction plans for County Road 15 from Commerce Boulevard to Seton Channel. They have also forwarded a preliminary cost .estimate of what Mound's participation would be in this project, a copy of which is attached. As requested, we have prepared a very preliminary cost estimate for adding new street lights to the project from Commerce Boulevard to Fairview Lane and the replacement of watemain from Fairview Lane to Fernside Lane. If the City should decide to proceed with either or both the new street lights and/or the watemain replacement, Mennepin County would like final plans submitted'to them by the first part of dune. They anticipate their final construction plans will be completed and submitted to Mound for approval by late summer or early fall. The project would be bid in danuary or February for construction in the summer of 1988. The following is a brief summary of each portion of the County Road 15 project, which the City should review. WATERHAIN REPLACEMENT The existing inplace watemain from Fairview Lane east to approximately 300 feet west of Fernside Lane is of 1930 vintage. The remainder of the main east to Fernside Lane was constructed in the early 1960's. 8oth of these sections have a record of numerous watermain breaks and should be replaced since it is located within the paved portion of the new road construction. If the main is rebuilt, most of services and curb stops should also be replaced at the same time. Our rough estimate for this watemainreplacement is $55,000.00. Hennepin County has suggested, and we would agree, that the replacement be bid with the County project to minimize the. cost. If it is the City's desire to proceed in this manner, final plans would need to be prepared and submitted to Hennepin County by early dune. We would consider this to be a capital .improvement, which would not be assessed to the property owners. STREET LIGHTS At the present time, there exists eight (8) old-style fluorescent street Iights between Commerce Bouievard and the Post Office. These iights are outdated and expensive to operate and maintain, in fact, the one in front of Century Auto Body had to be removed and has not been repiaced. Four of the Mr. Edward O. Shukle, Or. April 6, 1987 Page Two lights appear to be within the area of the proposed reconstruction on County Road 15 and may need to be relocated by the County's Contractor. We have prepared a rough cost estimate for installing 30 new high_pressuresodium street lights between Commerce Boulevard and F~rview~e. The estimated cost is $132,000, of which a very small amount, approximately $8,000, would be paid by Hennepin County if the four (4) existing lights need to be relocated due to their construction. One suggested method of financing this project would be as follows: City Owned Property and intersecting streets Private Property Total Footage served by New Street Lights $ 1,840 L.F. 4~300 L.F. $ 6,140 L.F.' City Property Private Property 1,840 L.F. ~ 6,140 L.F. 4,300 L.F. ~ 6,140 L.F. City Share of Cost 65% (30% + 35%) Cost to be Assessed to Private Property $85,800.00 $46,200.00 Cost per lineal foot to be assessed $46,200.00 + 4,300 L.F. $ 10.74/~ The street lights that were installed on Comme~ce Boulevard in 1981 cost $187,252.13 of which $68,700.00 was assessed. Residential p~operty was assessed $4.38/L.F. and all remaining property paid $6.57/L.F. COUNTY ROAD 15 RECONSTRUCTION As you will note from the attached cost estimate from Hennepin County, the City of Mound's share of the project is approximately $262,320. Some of these items are eligible for state aid reimbursement to either the County or the City, but not both. If the City wants to use money from their MSA construction fund, an agreement will need to be negotiated with Hennepin County because they have first priority on state aid funds since it is their project. We would suggest the City use monies from their MSA Construction Fund to finance to the limit items which are eligible and negotitate the details with Hennepin County before approving the plans. We have estimated that approximately $189,600.00 of the $262,320.00 would be eligible for state aid reimbursement. When County Road 110 was improved in 1~81, a portion of the cost was assessed to the abutting property owners. We wouid suggest that some of the cost of this project aiso be assessed. If the totai cost of Mound's share of the cost for curb and gutter and driveway aprons were assessed'on a iineai foot basis, the proposed assessment would be $5.46/L.F. ($55,683 ~ i0,200.00 L.F.). Of the total footage the City owned property and intersecting streets again account for approximately 30%, which would require the City to pay Mr. Edward O. Shukle, dr. April 6, 1987 Page Three approximately $16,380.00 (3,000 L.F. · $5.46/LF). The cost for the stom sewer improvements could be assessed much the same way. For discussion purposes, we estimated the drainage area at 2,500,000 S.F., with the City property comprising 30~ of this total. The total cost to Mound for storm sewer improvements on County Road ~5 is approximately $121,000.00. Assuning this cost is assessed on a square foot'basis over the projected drainage area, this cost would be approximately $.048/SF ($121,000 - 2,500,000 S.F). The City's share of the storm sewer would' then be approximately $36,000.00 (750,000 SFO $.048/SF). Again for 'discussion purposes, we are proposing to assess 25~ ($14,643.00) of total cost ($58,573.00) of the sidewalk construction. On a lineal foot basis, this would be approximately $2.00/LF ($14,643.00 - 7,200 LF). The City would pick up the remaining cost of $43,930.00. When County Road 110 was improved in 1981, the abutting properties were assessed $3.45 per line, foot for curb and gutter, $1.53 per square foot for driveway aprons and $0. per square, foot for storm sewer. None of the sidewalk cost was assessed, probably because a major portion of it was replacement and therefore, Hennepin County did not cha~ge Mound. This information' has been submitted to you for discussion purposes with the City Council. If they should decide to 9o ahead with any of these projects and intend on assessing any of the cost, a more detailed report will be required and public hearings need to be held. If you or the Council should have any questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Jg:jmj Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron SUMMARY OF COST AND ~TNOD OF PAY~NT Estimated Cost to Mound for County Road Improvements Wate~main Replacement Street Lights TotaI Estimated Cost -Aii Projects INCOME - STATE AID MONEY AND ASSESSHENTS Street Light Assessment 4,300 L.F. 0 $10.74/LF Curb & Gutter & Conc. Apron Assessment 7,200 L.F. 0 $ 5.46/LF Storm Sewer Assessment 1,750,000 S.F. · $0.048/SF Sidewalk Assessment 7,200 L.F. · $ 2.00/LF Total Assessments (Private Property) State Aid Reimbursement Rrojected Income Total Estimated Cost for all projects Project Income Deficit (to be paid by the City) $1~2~ooo 449,320' $ 46,182 39,312 84,000 14,4oo $ 183,894 189~600 $ 373,494 $ 449,320 373~494 $ 75,826 O0 0oo 000 t~oo 0oo o o 0 o 0 o 0 0 ~" 0 00000 0 000~0 0 00000 0 bpamt/~u~ ..... the City of Mound.~ a · '; ' .T . April MinnesOta municiPal, corporation Lot 22, Block 5, Dreamwood .PID #13-117-24.~12 0026,.City of Mound, Hennepin' County, Mi nnesota ~ ~al~e anb to ill~olb. :Z'Ae above r~t,~ ln-~niaea ~ f~ one ear .................... ......... J.~t~ .................................. ~V of ...... ~.~.i.1 .................. . ~ ~ ,~ ~...... a~r~..i. ~ a~ w~ t~ ~ L~or .... ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ f~ ~ove ~ p~ It is sPecificall.y understood and agreed by and between, the par~ies ~hat the lessee shall only have a right to use a portion of the aforedescrlbed lands and tha~ the only use that they may pu~ this proper~y to is' ~o plant a garden, lt. is further understood and agreed [ha~ the lessor, re~alns all rlgh~s ~o use and maintain ~he properW and.tha~ the gardening shall no~ in any ~ay ln~erfere ~ith the lessor~s main purpose for this land. The lessee'further agrees .lha~ In addition to the aforementioned considera~lon, ~hey ~.11 maintain the site, mo~ing the grass, cu=tlng the ~eeds and keeping the properW*clear of ~i~ter during the ~erm of this lease. The only purpose for ~hich the lessee:may use this ground is to plant.a vegetable 9arden and ~here shall be no. sto~age, parking or other use of this property by the lessee. :I ~llbtlZttl~t, ~I~IV~ .... lqth ' ' ',~,~¥ o! .... April City.of Houndt a Hinnesota municipal corporation Lo~s 10, 11 and 12, Block q,'L.p. Crevler's S~bdivision' Par~ of Lot 36 Lafayette Park, City of Hound, Hennepin County, Hinnesota" ~; ... ............ 1..~.tb ................... 8~3/ of .......... Ap.r.i.L ........... --, 2988 ...... ' .-_ It is specifically understood and agreed by'and'be~ween the parties that the lessee shall.only have a right to use a portlon~of the aforedescribed lands and that the only use that they may put this property to is to p].ant a garden. It is farther under- stood and agreed that the lessor retains'all rights to use.and maintain the proper, ty for a municipal well site and that the gardening sha]l not in any way interfere with the lessor~s ~in purpose for this iand. The lessee further agrees that In addition to the afor~entioned consideration, they'will 'maintain the site, mowing the grass, cutting the weeds and keeping the we]] site clear of litter during the term of this lease. The only purpose for which the lessee may u.se this ground is to plant ~ vegetable garden and there shall.be no'storage~ parking or other use of this property by the ]essee. ~s ~ CITY OF HOUND Eay Kramer - Ho, ~ 533 -L~--~l-'O~w~ Yom t Lots 1, 2, ~ & 22, Block 5, Dreamwood,. PIg ~13-117-24 12 0223 -;: I~o ~abt anb to Wu[b. The a~ow r~f,~T p~em,~aea z~ta t~ ~ L~a~....% ...... ~he.i~. ................ ~rf G~ ~t~, /~ ~ ~r~d t~e /~t ~ o~.....:. ............... ~...Y~..C.....: .................................................... ./ro~ G~ G/~ ~I~ ............. : ........... !~.~ ............................. ~v of ................. ~.~.L.! ........................ , ~9....~. ............................................................. ~ t~ m~ Z~f~....s a~r~...... ~ a~ w~k t~ ~ L~or...... ~ ~ ~ r~ ~or ~ a~ve ~ pre~ ues t~ ~m ~....~.n~....~.~.LL~.r.....~L..~.~.~-.~.~.~....~.~.~.~.~...g~...a~...xa.].~.~.~].L~..~..i.~.~.~a..LL~.-~L:~8 It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties that the lessees s~11 only have a right to.use the aforedescrlbed lands and that the only use that they may put this property to Js to.plant a garden. The lessees further agreed that they ~111 main:ain the site, mowing 'the grass, cut:ing the weeds and keeping the s~te clear, of li::er during the term of :~is.lease. THe only purpose for ~H1ch :he lessees may use ~his ground is to plant'a vegetable garden, .which may not be used as e commercial garden plot, and there.shall be no storage, parking or other use of this property,by the Jessees. ~ ~ t~ ab~w m~ p~ ~ ~t~ s~, or ~ pay t~ for t~ ~ a~ve ~ CITY OF HOUND ~, ~ ~ D~[ve~ ~ P~ o/ .~yS?...~ ....................... ~ ....................................... ....(8~).: .......................................................................... ................................................ City Hanager . ~'~ '' T&S-~T~'~ ........................................... ..................................................................... Beverly Nallis RESOLUTION NO. 87- Apt.il l~t, 1987 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO SELL CITY PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Mound owns the southwest 1/2 of Lot 16, Block 1~, Arden; and WHEREAS, Tuxedo Blvd. is completed in front of the lot and no right-of-way for that street was required on the City owned property; and WHEREAS, Brighton Blvd is a State Aid road and if any anytime in the future this street was improved with State Aid money, the State will require that the City have a 60 foot right- of-way; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has no objection to selling all of the City owned part of Lot 16 except any of it located within 30 feet of the present Brighton Blvd. right-of-way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of' the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a Quit Claim Deed to Andrew Scott and Elizabeth Ann Cummings, for $~00.00, selling the following described City property: "That part of Lot 16, Block 18, Arden, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin 'County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the west 30.00 feet of said Lot 16 and southerly of the following described line: Beginning'at the northwest corner of said Lot 16; thence in a southeasterly direction to the southeast corner of said Lot 16 and said line there terminating." The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember ..... The"followlng Councilmembers voted, in-the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk 25 ~6 Marshi 28 31 30 13 8 16 - L *°' : ' ' 't' ' * :'" ~ '"' ~$-. .: ": ~ .' :. .-. · .~.' .. :..... , =..: -.. ~ ·. . . '.'-..' . :.~. ',:., I hereb~ certff7 that I surveyed tho proper~ described above,,n~ t~at tho abram",'~ ~lat h · correct ~ra~enf~tlo= of m~M aureev.' ..... ...-:- ,-4, · ... '..: .:.'- . , .~. ..... :.-...;~:~" a~eps~ .'& oon~. ate valk encroach into vas t~"f~ ~o .BI~. ~v por~ .,.... . .;:~ N0 delinquent ~es ~d ~sfez en~red; Certificate of.Real Estate V~ue ( ) filed ( ) not requ~ed Ce~ificate of Re~ Es~te V~ue No. ,1g - County Audito, by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date:_ Aprl ] ,19 ~87 _ (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ~ i c i oel Corporation undO: _ _ _: .. _ . G:a~tor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Andrew ~;cott and , __ , O:antee (s), I I I ' ' ' . ' I~ ~ - . CounW, Minneso~, described ~ foBows: property in H.nne~ ~ That part of Lot 16~ alock 1~, Arden, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, ~innesota, lying easterly of the west 30.00.feet of said Lot 16 and southerly of the following described l~ne: Beginning at the no~hwest corner of said Lot 16; thence ~n a southeasterly direction to the southeast corner of sald Lot 16 and sa~d llne there terminating. (if more soece Is needed, continue off bock) together ~th all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. CI~'Y OF MOUND' Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here By By_ ~ayor City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 COUNTY OF He~er; ~ - · The foregoing was acknowl~dged before me this 14 dayof April '~ ,19 87 , by_ .~teve 5mltl~ and City Manaqer the~ ~ - , a ~unicipal corporation of t~ ~ ~ Mound CitV of Mound ..' under the laws of ~' on beh~f of ~e _ ~OZA~ZA~ SZA~P OR SZA~ (OR O~ZR ~Z~Z O~ ~A~X) -- ~ SIGNATURE 0F pERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT &x Stltement*'for the re~ Vtoperty described in thil ~t ~o~d ': ~, sent to (lneludo fl~e And address of Gr~te,): ' DRAFTE~ ~HISINSTRVMENTWAS Francene C. Clark Clty Clerk City of Mound 5341Maywood Road · Mound, MN. 55364 . April 14, 1987 RESOLUTION 87- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE QUIT CLAIM DEED SELLING CITY PROPERTY WHEREAS, Island Park was platted in the early 1900's and thi~ platting was done on paper without looking at the topography of the land; and WHEREAS, when the lake was raised some of this platted land became wetlands or part of'the lake itself; and WHEREAS, Mr. Net1 Weber owns Blocks 15 and 16, Whipple, which do not abut an improved City street and are unbulldable because the City of Mound's Zoning Ordinance requires property to abut an improved street and have a 50 foot frontage on that street to be bulldable; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 1985, (Resolution #85-53), the City Council vacated the following unimproved streets: Windsor Lane (between Blocks 15 and-16) Drummond Road (between Blocks 10 and 15) Cobden Lane (between Blocks 10 and 11) also known as Gobden Lane (see Exhibit "A"); and WHEREAS, in order to gain access to Blocks 15 and 16 from an improved street (Hanover Road), Mr. Weber needed to purchase Lots 2, 3, 4, 22, 23, 24 and part of Lot 1, Block 11, Whipple and parts of Lots 13, lq, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21, Block 10, Whipple, which were State owned, tax forfeit parcels; and WHEREAS, in order to help make this project.conform with our Zoning Ordinance and constitute a sound and orderly development of land, the City then requested that the County Board allow the City to purchase the property and then resell it to Mr~ Weber for the price paid, plus administrative expenses; and WHEREAS, the County Board agreed to sell the City the property (PID t25-117-2a 12 0225 for $1,568.00; and WHEREAS, Mr. Weber is now requesting that the City sell this property to him. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: April 14, 1987 1. Does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a Quit Claim Deed to The Weber Group, Inc. for the following described property: · "PID #25-117-24 12 0225; City of Mound; ADDN "Whipple" Lots 2 B 4 22 2B and 24 Blk 11 also that part of Lot 1 Blk 11 and Lots 13 thru 21 incl Blk 10 also that part of vacated Cobden La desc as fols beg at NW cot of Lot 1 Blk 11 th E along N line thof dist 22 ft th S 41 deg 59 rain 14 sec E dist 26.91 ft th S 44 deg B mtn B9 sec E dist ~B.14 ft th S 50 deg 21 rain 21 sec E dtst 45.~5 ft th S 51 deg 20 min 25 sec E dist 19.21 ft th S 50 deg 28 rain B9 sec E dist 51.86 ft th S 68 deg 11 rain 55 sec E dist ~B.08 ft th S 80 deg 4 min 26 sec E dist 40.61 ft th N 75 deg 57 rain 50 sec E dist 41.23 ft th N 78 deg 41 rain 24 sec E dist 40.79 ft th E dist 40 ft th S 47 deg 43 min 35 sec E dist 4~.60 ft to S line of Lot 21 Blk 10 th W dist BSB ft to SE cot of Lot 24 Blk 11 th N to SE cot of Lot 1 th W to SW cor thof N to beg incl adJ 1/2 of vac street." ® The Weber Group, Inc.,will pay the following for the property: $1,568.00 - property described above 550.00 - administrative costs in obtaining the land for sale ____~- Special Assessment Payment for 1987 $2,482.72 TOTAL The remaining special assessments for the 1980 Street Improvement (total of $3,005.54 principal) will be assessed over' the nine remaining years of the assessment at 8% interest on the unpaid balance, per year. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Form No. 31.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Nim.¢,otJ Uniform No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not requlre.d Certificate of Real Estate Value No. ,19 , County Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: ,19 , (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ' the CFty of Mound ,a municloal cornoration underthelawsol _R tat. r,~ M ;'nnp-~ , Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to ~he Weber Grouo. Inc. ,Grantee, a corporation under the ]aws of ~;[ate of Hinnesota ,realprop. ertyin Hennep i n ' C(~unty, Minnesota, described as follows: PID #25-117-24 12 0225; City of Mound; AODN "Whipple" - Lots 2'3 4 22 23 and 24, Blk 11 also chat part of Lot 1 Blk 11 and Lots 13 thru 21 incl. BIk 10 also that part of vacated Cobden La desc as fols beg at NW cdr of Lot 1.Blk 11 th E along N 'line thor dist 22 ft th S 41 del 59man 14 sec E dist 26,91 ft th S .44 deg 3 man 39 sec E dist 43,14 ft th 5'50 deg 21.man 21 sec E dist 45,45 ft th S 51 deg 20 mln 25 sec E dist 19,21 ft th S 50 deg 28 mis 39 sec E dist 51,86 ft th S 68 deg.ll mln 55 secE dist 43,08 ft th S 80 deg 4 mln 26 sec E dist 40.61 ft th N 75 deg 57 mln 50 sec E dist 41,23 ft th N 78 deg 41 mis 24 sec. E dist 40,79 ft th E dlst 40 ft th S 47 deg 43 man 35 se¢'E dist' 44,60 ft to $ 1Liie of Lot 21 Blk 10 th W dist 353 ft tO SE car of Lot 24 Blk !1 th N to'SE car of Lot 1 th W to. SW car thor th N to beg incl adj 1/2 of var, street, |If more space Ts needed, continue on back) together with aLI hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. CITY OF MOUND Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here By Its Mayor By STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Hennep i n The foregoing was acknowledged before ~e thi~ the Maynr Of i;he Cil;y of Mound under the hw~ of State of ~nnesot~ Its City Manager NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) ,.day of A~ril ,'19 87., and Edward J. Shukle, Jr ..... , .,Da be~aL~ofthe city of MmJnd .... SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT . Tax Statements for the reel properly dsmcztbed h, %hi. im~r,m~e~t mhould be sent to (Includg name and addre~ of Ormntee): THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DILAFTED BY ~AME AND ADDRESS): Francene C. Clark City Clerk City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound~ MN, 55364 April 1~, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain lands within the City have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes; and " WHEREAS, the City of Mound has a number of tax parcels which do not comply with the City's zoning ordinance and building codes because of a lack of minimum area, shape, frontage, access prob~ lems, or the parcels contain nuisances or dangerous conditions which are adverse to the health, safety and general welfare of residents of this City; and WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining legislation which would allow said parcels to be withheld from public-sale and sold at a non-public sale to eliminate nuisances and dangerous conditions and to increase compliance with land use ordinances and Minnesota Laws of 1982, Chapter 523, Article 39, Sect. 6 was adopted to provide said.authority to the City and the County'; and WHEREAS, a specific list of tax forfeited lands has been provided the City and the City wishes to restrict and condition the sale of certain lands to bring them into conformance with City ordinances and land use goals; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M.S. ~29.07, Subd. ~; M.S. ~3§.23 and M.$. 4~4.076); and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold (M.S. 282.01, Subd. 3). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The County Board is hereby requested to impose con'dl- tions on the sale of the following described lands, and is further requested to sell such lands only to owners of lands adjoining at a non-public sale so that said lands will be combined for tax and land use purposes and April 14, 1987 PARCEL (PID) REASON FOR' AND CONDITIONS TO will comply with City ordinances and regulations: SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE (Lot 2~, Block 13,Undersized lot to be Avalon) sold only to and combined with ad- Joining properties NONE Lot 2, Block lB, Avalon is approved to be split off of PID 119-117-23 31 0047. This.land was conveyed to the City in State Deed ~761656 on April 21, 1961 for road and drainage purposes. The City has determined that it does not need Lot 2, Block 13, Avalon, except for the easement that should be put on'this lot in favor of the City of Mound. "A permanent easement for utility and drainage purposes over, under and across' Lot 2, Block 13, AVALON, aocording to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said easement being all that part of Lot 2 which lies northeasterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of said Eot 2, distant 3.00 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence southeasterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant 35.00 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating." 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to the County imposing the aforestated condi- tions and the lien of special assessments on said lands. 3. · The City of Mound is releasing the above properties ~subJect to street and utility easements being retained by the City of Mound. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE FORFEITURE NONE The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: 'Mayor ' ' Oepartment of Taxation Form No. 108 Approved by AttorneY General 7.2(~69 BY CO~~ S~DI~SIONS WHEREA~, Pursuant to Minneso~ ~tatutes, ~ection 282.01, aubdlvlsion 1, the ~TATE 0F MINNESOTA, as trustee under Minnesota Statute, Section 281.25, on the ~ s ~ de, of A~rit .,19 6~ ; conveyed to C~ty o~ ~e,~nd (~ n~ ~7~) a governmental subdivision, certain l~nds, of which the lands hereinafter described are a portion, to used for an author~ed public use, and W~REAS, Said governmental subdivision has failed to put the lams herei~fter des~i~d to the public use for which it was conveyed and the governing body thereof has author~ed the proper officers to convey the same ~ the State of Mi~esota, as such trustee, NOW, T~REFORE, This ~denture, made this 18 lb day of Ap ri 1 , 19~, between C i ~v of ~o.nd , a gove~entai subdivision of the State of Mi~esota, as party of the first part, and the State of Minneso~, as trustee ~ hereafter set forth, as party of the second pa~, WITNESSETH, That the said p~y of the first part, in consideration of the pre.sea and other valuable consideraMons, the receipt whereof is hereby ac~owledged, does hereby Grant, gain, Quitclaim and Reconvey unto the said pa~y of the se~nd part all the tract or parcel of land and being ~ the County of ~e~eO i n in the S~te of Minneso~, described as follows, ~wit: ho~ 2. 8lock 1], Avalon. exceot fo~ the follo~in9 easement that should be out on this lot in favor of the ~lty of ~ound: (SEE RE$0L~T[0~ ~87- A permanent easement for utility and drainage purposes over, under and across Lot 2,' Block 1), AVALON, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said easement being all that part of.said Lot 2 which lies northeasterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the'west.line of 'said Lot 2, distant ).00 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 21 thence southeasterly to e point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant )5.00 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 2 and.said line there terminating:.. and i~ ri t~. rlo~b '" and i~ corporate se~ to be hereunto afl, ed the day and year first above written. In Presence of: STATE OF ~fllqlqESOTA ].ss. COUNTY OF H~nn-p~n On this a ~Jr~i'ary P,~B1 |c CITY OF MOUND Name of Governmental Sub~iston Its Hayor Its City Clerk day of , 19 , before me, within and for said county, personally appeared . and , to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn say that they are respectively th- Maynr and the C:itv Clerk of the governmental subdivision named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said governmental subdivision, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said governmental subdivision by authority of it~ C i t¥ Counc i l and safd Mayo r and C i tv C; 1 erk , acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said governmental subdivision. APPROVAL The undersigned, acting for the Commissioner of Taxation of the State of Minnesota, under delegation of authority duty filed with the Secretary of State, does hereby approve the foregoing conveyance to the State of Minnesota. Dated :. In the Presence of: STATE OF MINNESOTA Commissioner of Taxation A. THOMAS WURST, P.A. CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A. UAMES O. LARSON, P.A. THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD, P.A. CRAIG M. MERTZ ROGER d. Ir[LLOWS LAW OFFICIr$ WURST, PEARSON, I.ARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ I100 FIRST SANK PLACE: WF. ST MINN£APOLI$, MINNESOTA 5540:) April 8, 1987 (612) 33B-4~00 Mayor and City Council City of Mound, Minnesota Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Annual Report Dear Mayor, Councilmembers, and Ed: Ed has indicated that the Council would like some background information on legal services provided by our firm in 1986. My partner Jim Larson handles the criminal aspect and all the prosecution along with other associates or partners in our firm. I have asked him to provide a prosecution summary for 1986, and that letter under date of April 7, 1987, is attached. I believe that letter is self-explanatory and gives you a great deal of detail concerning the criminal aspects and the City's participation in the court system for 1986. Ed has further asked that I report to the Council on major activities that have taken place in 1986 or major pieces of legal work. We continue to be involved in all of the subdivision matters which take place in the City'and handling title problems and working with the planner and the building department. The Allied Painting case has gone on throughout the year and has right now been through an arbitration hearing and will undoubtedly be certified for trial once we get the arbiter's decision. Continental Telephone activities were a big part of the relationship between the City and our office in 1986. The City was considering condemning the telephone system and attempting to negotiate with Continental Telephone on the question of rates and other matters. This was a continuing activity until the consultant's report indicated it was not feasible for the City to condemn the system. The City Hall roof problem was on-going during the year and was finally settled with the Council's approval. This litigation is now being brought to a conclusion. WUR,~T, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ Page 2 Mayor and City Council Mr. Ed Shukle April 8, 1987 The City had substantial land acquisition activity in 1986 in that the Lynwood Boulevard improvement proceedings were completed, a lot was acquired from Steve Coddon, and the Lost Lake land case was completed in the City's favor and the registration was completed. Work took place in several areas on preparing agreements and negotiating between the City of Mound and its neighboring cities concerning the extension of utilities to serve properties outside the City. These types of activities were generally charged back against the developer. The City Code was completed after more than three years of work and has been printed and distributed. The lion's share of the work on this matter was done by Mr. Craig Mertz of this office and my assistant Lucy Hadler. This involved a great deal of time for Fran Clark and other department heads, but particular thanks is owed to Fran for her help and assistance in bringing this to fruition. Our firm of six attorneys has five attorneys who do work for the City on various occasions. The lion's share of the civil work is done by me, criminal work mainly by Jim Larson, land title work by Tom Underwood, and Roger Fellows and Craig Mertz work on prosecution and other miscellaneous matters. Basically, we feel it has been a good year in that the City has had no serious losses and all of our officials and employees have remained outside the jail! We look forward to continuing to work with the new Council and the fine administrative staff which Mound has assembled over the years. City Attorney City of Mound CAP:Ih Enclosure A. THOMAS WURST. P.A. Cu1~1'15 A. P£AR$ON. P,A. THOMAS ~. UNO~WO0O, P.A. CRAIG M. MER~ ROGER U. ~ELLOWS LAW OFFICES WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & ME;RTZ IIOO FIRST BANK I=LACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNr$OTA 5540~' April 7, 1987 Ed Shukle, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: 1986 Prosecution Summary Dear Ed: Pursuant to your request, I have summarized my prosecution activities for the year 1986. The 1986 totals are: Total number of cases: 2346 Case by type: misdemeanor and petty misdemeanors: 2296 gross misdemeanors 50 Total cases resolved before pretrial: 2189 Misdemeanor cases resolved at pretrial: 117 Misdemeanor cases resolved after pretrial: 54 Court trials: 4O Total hours: Of the 2346 total cases, 221 were initiated by formal complainants, which I prepare after a review of the case file. I have reviewed the formal complaint records and the following summary shows how the formal complaint requests originated: Formal Complaints Zoning & Building Code Enforcement: Police Department requests: Unanswered tickets: Gross Misdemeanors: Court demands: Animal violations: Bad Checks: Total complaints: 14 117 70 5O 27 26 12 221 The above column of numbers adds to more than 221 because there is duplication. For example, all gross misdemeanors are initiated by police department request, and all the animal violation complaints (dog at large and dog license 9iolations) were unanswered tickets. WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON~ UNDERWOOD ~ MERTZ Ed Shukle Page Two April 7, 1987 The hours spent can really be broken down into three categories: (1) arraignments, pretrials and court trials, (2) jury trials, and (3) preparing complaints. Mound has been allocated two Mondays per month for arraignments, pretrial and court trials. Generally, arraignments and pretrials are scheduled on Monday mornings and pretrials and court trials on Monday afternoons. Jury trials are scheduled for 8:30 a.m. Monday thru Friday on the weeks we do not have arraignments. As you know, the City has a policy of not negotiating on DWI cases where there has been a test refusal or a test result of .12 or higher. While this has resulted in more cases being, set for trial, in every case the defendant has pleaded guilty to the DWI on or before the day of trial. As you can see from the hourly breakdown below, a large percentage of time is used preparing complaints. This is a necessary element of prosecution, and one which seems to grow each year. When local prosecutors were given the authority to handle gross misdemeanors, the formal complaint load went up. There is legislation pending which would create several new gross misdemeanors, which in turn will require that more of my time is spent preparing complaints. Prosecution Time Summary: Arraignments, Pretrials & Court Trials: Jury Trials: Complaints: Other: 160 hours 75 hours 185 hours 15 hours Total: 435 hours secretarial (no charge) 600 hours In summary, my perception of the prosecution function is that the time required is gradually increasing in proportion to the general increase in police activity. I also expect an increase in formal complaints. I appreciate the support I receive every day from your staff and I look forward to a continuation of a very workable and professional relationship. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ Ed Shukle Page Three April 7, 1987 not hesitate to contact me. cc: Curtis A. Pearson Len Harrell VgrY tr~/~y yours, <, Jam~ D. Larson A. THOMAS WURST. P.A, CURTIS A PEARSON. ID.A, dAMES 0. LARSON, THOMAS Ir. UNDERWOOD, P.A. CRAIG M. ROGER d. FELLOWS WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD ~,~ MIt'RTZ A IBANTNERiLNIII~ INCLUDIN~ ~)I~o!r[IISIONAL ASIOClATIONS I100 FIRST ~AN~ PLACE W~ST ~INNEAPOLIS, MINNEgOTA S5402 ~pr~l 8, 1987 (61~) 338 '~,S)00 Abdo, Abdo, and Eick Certified Public Accountants 3500 West 80th Street, Suite 440 Minneapolis, MN 55431 Mound City Council Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Mound Claims Audit and Summary for Year 1986 Gentlemen: I have been contacted by John Norman, Finance Director, and Ed Shukle, City Manager, for the City of Mound who have directed me to prepare a status report for outstanding claims that existed on December 31, 1986, and also to report on claims and matters which have come to our attention since that date. Mr. Norman has authorized me to release this information to Abdo; Abdo, and Eick as auditors for the City for the calendar year 1986. I wish to preface my remarks and my report by stating that during the year a number of people threatened litigation against the City. These threats are received at Council meetings, over the telephone, and sometimes by mail, but most of those threats do not turn into ~itigation. I all, want it understood that a number of lawsuits and claims for damages against the City are handled by the City's insurance companies, and the litigation in those cases is conducted by insurance company lawyers rather than the City Attorney. I do participate in a number of these claims if the alleged amounts of damages are in excess of the insurance coverages. The City generally does carry sufficient insurance to cover the City adequately under the claims statute and most normal claims. I will review for you litigation currently being hnadled by me in this office as of December 31, 1986, and to the date of this letter. The cases and their summaries are as follows: ??o WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & lV~ERTZ Page 2 Abdo, Abdo, and Eick April 8, 1987 1. Susan Carlson v. City of Mound. lack of activity since 1984. Closed in 1986 after 2. Ail Star Electric v. City of Mound. No payment by City. Closed in 1986. 3. Belcourt v. City of Mound. Closed in 1986. No payment by City. 4. Lincoln Johnson v. City of Mound. Notice of claim was filed by the City under date of October 4, 1985. The in- formation has been provided to the City's insurance carrier, and to the best of my knowledge there has been no further activity and no litigation. We will close our file at this time. 5. Lyman Lumber Co. v. City of Mound and others. This is an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien on a piece of property in the'City of Mound and the City was named as a defendant. I interposed an answer to this matter on April 16, 1984. The plaintiff's attorney has not followed through and I am doing nothing to stir up this old claim. I am not anticipating any loss to the City. 6. Rager v. City of Mound. A summons and complaint was served on the City in 1982 for a water damage claim. The matter .was referred to the insurance company and an answer was interposed by the City. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no further activity on this file. I will close the file this year if there is nothing new. - ~ 7. Sanderson v. City of Mound. Closed in 1986. No payment by City. 8. Smith v. City of Mound. Resolved by the insurance company in 1986. No activity by this office. The matter has been closed. 9. Ziskin v. City of Mound. Closed in 1986. No payment by City. 10. Steven Doe and Margaret Doe v. City of Mound and County of Hennepin. This is a lawsuit which has been referred to many times over the years and is far and away the most serious item on the claims list. The plaintiffs have sued for $22,000,000 WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & ~F..RTZ Page 3 - Abdo, Abdo, and Eick April 8, 1987 alleging that their children were taken away from them improperly by Hennepin County and representatives of the City of Mound;- This arose out of a sexual abuse of children complaint. The City's and the County's insurance companies are handling this matter and I am involved only to the extent that the complain£ alleges more damages than the City carries in coverage. I have worked with attorneys for our insurance company, and there have been indications that our insurance company could have settled this claim within our policy limits. We will continue to watch this file, and I am sure the insurance companies will keep us advised. 1!. Peterson v. City of Mound. This is a petition for writ of mandamau and a complaint. The lawsuit was commenced in 1984. The attorney for one of the individual defendants and I have both interposed answers, and the plaintiff has not pursued the matter. We will let this file rest, and if we hear nothing in 1987 we will close our file. 12. Skinner v. City of Mound. This matter was dismissed in 1986 with no payment by the City. 13. Voorhees v. City of Mound. with no payment by the City. This was closed in 1986 14. Allied Painting v. City of Mound. This is a claim commenced by a contractor who was retained to paint our water towers. The City is holding roughly $17,000, and the lawsuit is now in the process of being tried. We are today sending a copy of the City's brief to the City_Manager, but for the purposes of the audit we ~ould point out thaYthe maximum amount of potential liability for the City would be $17,000 to $20,000. 15. Hild v. City of Mound. This was a conciliation court matter filed in 1986 and tried on May 12, 1986. We have heard nothing from the court but the case was defended by our office and we are presuming was upheld in the City's favor. We will keep the matter on our claim list, and if nothing occurs in 1987, we will close our file. 16. Davis v. City of Mound. A notice of claim has been filed with the City for the back-up of a sewer. The damages are apparently quite small and the matter has been referred to the insurance company. WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & IV~ERTZ Page 4 . Abdo, Abdo, and Eick April 8, 1987 17. Marquardt v. City of Mound. A summons and complaint was served on the City on October 27, 1986. The property owner alleges that a member of the City crew dropped a tree on his property and-he claims it did $10,000 damage to bis shrubs and trees. The matter has been referred to the insurance company and I am sure it will be vigorously defended. I shall continue to watch if there is any need for direct City involvement. 18. J. M. Wood and K. U. Scballreuter. There are various complaints filed by these two persons against the City allegin§ that the City has harmed these people in many respects. They claim problems between the City and themselves regarding their dog, their garbage, our police department, and the repression of freedom in the City of Mound. We will hold the file open and will take no action unless we hear further from the complainants. 19. Sufficool v. Calhoun Realty. This is an action where a party is suing a realtor over a misrepresentation. The realtor's attorney has filed an answer and a cross-claim and has put the City on notice that his client obtained a plat map from the City of Mound which he says contains a representation as to the frontage of a lot. Basically, this has been stated to us as a potential claim for the City, and we have retained it in our claim file, but other than my discussion with the attOrney for the realtor, there has been no further activity. We will want to watch this to see that the City has no involvement. I believe that the foregoing is a complete and up-dated summary of any claims and litigation of which I am aware and which have been referred to me by the City. You have also asked the amount due fdr services and dis~ursements as of December 31, 1986, and that amount was $2290.50, and that amount has been paid in its entirety. I am not aware of any unasserted claims or assessments against which I can comment or which have been noted in our claims file other than those expressed herein. The City is involved in special assessments, condemnation cases, and other matters where lawsuits could be commenced, but to the best of my knowledge I anticipate no damage against the City or proper City officials of any unasserted claims. I as a matter of professional responsibility to the City will advise the City or proper City officials of any unasserted claims which come to my attention and which may call for financial disclosure statements. As I have indicated in prior reports, it is impossible to answer the WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ Page 5 ~ Abdo, Abdo, and Eick April 8. 1987 question concerning unasserted claims because over the period of a year there are a tremendous number of telephone calls, public meetings, and Council meetings and people involved with the City threaten litigation against the City. As I have previously stated, very few of those outbursts ever result in litigation. Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney City of Mound CAP:Ih cc: Mr. John Norman, Finance Director For April 14, 1987 Council Meeting April 9, 1987 GAMBLING LICENSE -- Class B (Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards,- Pull-tabs) Renewal - New License Period June 1, 1987 to May 31, 1988 VFW #5113 2544 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 THIS APPLICATION WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE CHARITABLE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND IF APPROVED BY THE BOARD WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT (3-23-87), UNLESS A RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY IS PASSED WHICH SPECIFICALLY DIS- ALLOWS SUCH ACTIVITY AND A COPY OF THAT RESOLUTION IS RECEIVED BY THE CHARITABLE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE. OTHER GAMBLING LICENSES IN MOUND ARE: Class A - American Legion #398 Our Lady of the Lake Class B - Northwest Tonka Lions 4 times a year - no license needed then -- Westonka Senior's A. THOMAS WURST. CURTIS A. PEARSON. UAMr.,5 D* I.~.RSON, P.A. THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD. P.A. CRAIG M. HERTZ ROGER d. FELLOWS LAW WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & ME:RTZ I100 FIRST SANK PEAGe MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 338.4EO0 Ms. Liz Jensen 2684 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 January 28, 1987 .,./z'~ ' Defense and Indemnity of City Council Members, Employees, and Appointed Officials Re: Dear Liz: At the Council meeting on January 27, you inquired about how Council members and/or City employees are defended if they are sued. In many cases they are, of course, defended .by the insurance carrier for the City, but there may be occasions wh'ere the insurance company denies coverage. Under Minnesota law Section 466.07., the City Council of any City may defend, save harmless, 'and indemnify any of its officers or employees, whether elected or appointed, against any tort, claim, demand, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of their duties. Under the same statute, the City shall indemnify and provide a defense for any employee subject to certain limitations set forth in the tort liability act.. Because this is a major concern to many commissioners and elected or appointed people, ! drew a specific ordinance for another City to relieve the commissioners of these fears and, in effect, to make it a responsibility of the City to do what the statute implies that they may. I am enclosing a copy of that ordinance which has been in effect in Brooklyn Park since 1979. Fortunately, to date we have had no claims which have required the City Attorney to defend Council members or com- missioners. I am copying Ed Shukle on this letter and sending him a copy of the ordinance, and you may wish to discuss it with him, and if you like the idea we could put it in ordinance form for Mound and incorporate it into the City Code. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me. CAP:ih Enclosure cc: Mr. Ed Shukle City Attorney Section S'ec'l: ion 201:100. Defense and Indemnificat'ion of Officers and ~ployees of the City. Subd. 1. Purpose. In recent years there has been a loss of sovereign immunity for municipal functions and employees and a trend has developed wherein municipalities, their officers, employees and agents have been joined in litiga- tion and a number of these lawsuits have been filed naming officers, employees and agents individually in lawsuits. As a result of this ~rend in the law, it becomes more difficult to obtain the services of citizens who are re- luctant to volunteer for service in muni6ipal government and to assume individual liability when acting in behalf of the City. City council members, employees end officers are in the normal course of events participants in many controversial decisions which result in litigation and ~bject the individuals to concern regarding personal liability. It is the purpose of this ordinance to 'unequivocally state that the City of Brooklyn Park will protect its City officials elected or appointed, includin~ members of the Plannin~ Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, Park and Recreation Commission, and other Commissions appointed by the City Council in performing their duties to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. Public officia.~ must be in a position to make decisions when they are needed and to act to implement decisions of the City Council. Action on controversial subjects and implementin~ policy decisions can and will result in errors on the part of an employee or an elected or appointed official, and it is determined that it is better that said officials act and risk some error and possible injury from such actions rather than not to act at all. The public health, safety and general welfare will be pro- moted and p~eserved by providing assurances to these individuals that they will be supported by the municipality in carrying out their official duties. Subd. 2. Defense and Indemnification. The City shall defend, save harmless and indemnify any of its officers and employees, whether elected or appointed, and specifically including members of its advisory commissions, against any tort, claim or demand, whether groundless or otherwise, arisin~ out of an alleged act o-TM omission occurring in the performance of their duty. This responsibility to defend and indemnify does not apply in cases of malfeasance in office or willful or wanton neglect of duty. Section 201:100 added by Ordinance #1979-310(A)' Section 201:100 Sub~. ~ Subd. ~. Def'ens'e COunsel. The City Council wall designate the City At+.orney o~ legal counsel representing an insurance carrier for the City to defend the City's employees and officers against all ~uch lawsuits wherein ~he employee or officer is individually named as a defend---hr. The'Ci=y shall continue to represent the employee or officer if the decision is appealed to a higher court, or the City Council may authorize the appeal of any decision against the officer or employee to a higher court. Subd. ~. Right to P~sonal' chun'se!. The provisions of this Section of t4e admlnis~rative code shall not supersede of preclude the o. fficer's or employee's right to r. etain at.his own expense hms personal legal counsel to provmde for hms defense. The determination as to whether ~o use the City's legal counsel, for which the City shall be responsible for defense costs, or whether the officer or employee chooses to use his own individual counsel at his own expense, shall be at his option, and if the official selects his own attorney, this shall relieve the City from all present and future obligations as they relate to any defense'or indemnification of the officer or employee for the alleged tort, claim or demand · Section 201:100 added by 0~dinance #197 9-310 (A) ~ WESTONKA INTERVENTION PROJECT FUNDING REQUEST TO THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE MOUND DOMESTIC ASSAULT INTERVENTION PROJECT History In November of 1984 the Westonka Intervention Project for domestic violence began servicing the cities of Mound and Minnetrista. Westonka Intervention Project began because of a need expressed by some 15 professionals, who work with families in the Westonka area, to do something about domestic violence. Healthcare providers, police officers, ministers, social workers, teachers and human service personnel were a11 overwhelmed with the many cases of domestic violence they encountered through their work with clients. A steering committee was formed to research as to what exactly, if anything, could be done to curtail this overwhelming problem. The Westonka Intervention Project was born as a result of this research. During the first two years of operation 237 families have been helped through interventions and support service. Many more people have gained a better under- standing and awareness of the problem of domestic violence through Westonka Intervention Project's community outreach. This was accomplished through l0 speaking engagements, a distribution of some 400 brochures telling of services available to victims of domestic viol'ence and 6 in service training sessions for volunteers. In November, 1985, the project 'received its' tax exempt non-profit license. The project has been operating ~olely on volunteers and minimal funding. Organization Information The Westonka Intervention Project is a community based, non-profit corporation. It is presently working with the police departments of Mound and Minnetrista which service some 12,900 people. Because the cities so closely border one another these police departments often work as a team. The use of the Westonka Intervention Project is policy for both police departments. The Westonka Intervention Project is the result of our communities commitment to provide needed services to its people. Through a study conducted by the West Hennepin Human Services planning board, it has been noted that Mound is actually a center for human services for many of the Western commUnities. In order to meet the needs of their many clients, the Human Service Programs network provides support to one another. The Westonka Intervention Project is an integral part of this networking, working closely with the Community Education Program, health centers, Mound and Minnetrista police departments, city officials, the Mound Westonka School District, W~ston Christian Services, Chrysalis, and West Hennepin Human Services planningboard. Staff Positions. Reporting to the Board of Directors (see attachment No. l) are one volunteer director and one administrative secretary volunteer. There are presently twenty volunteer crisis advocates, who provide key information to victims and assailants of domestic violence. Westonka Intervention Project Description In the past 5 years community based advocacy groups have had a significant impact on chan§ing the focus of police and courts in their involvement with domestic assault. New laws have been introduced which gives a clear message that battering is no longer a "family matter" but a crime and a concern of the entire community. Police have been given the authority to arrest assailants without witnessing the incident, provided they have probablecause to believe an assault did occur. Community groups throughout the state, such as Duluth, Marshall, St. Cloud, Eagan and locally in Brooklyn Center, Plymouth, Golden Valley, Hopkins and St. Louis Park have initiated and or planning intervention projects. The advocacy work already accomplished in these communities with local probation officers and court systems will benefit the development of the Westonka Intervention Project. The Westonka Intervention Project was organized in November, 1984, to develop a cooperative effort by existing agencies (police, courts, shelters, and services to victims and batterers) in order to maximize the success of comunity intervention in domestic assault cases and violations of Orders of Protection. The purpose of the Westonka Intervention Project is to see our community develop a consistent intervention process with abusers that protects victims by providing external controls, on the violence until alternative behaviors are learned by the assailants. Both the victims of domestic violence and the community benefit from this program. The Westonka Intervention Project is the first program in the Mound Westonka area to develop an effective response to the victims of domestic violence. No similar program exists in the area. The following organizations know of the work done through the Westonka Intervention Project and provide similar or complementary services. However, they are not affiliated with the Westonka project. They are: West Hennepin Human Services Sojourner Shelter Home Free Shelter Southwestern Valley Alliance Phoenix Perspectives Mound and Minnetrista Police Departments Domestic Abuse Project Chrysalis Center for Women Mound Community Services Social Work Office, Mound Schools Tonka Alano Westonka Christian Services St. joseph's House How the Project Operates When the Mound or Minnetrista Police Departments make an arrest in a domestic assault call, the police diSpatch calls the primary volunteer cris)s advocate on a beeper. Advocates work either a day (8:00am-5:OOpm) or night (5:00pm-8:OOam) shift. The primary advocate contacts his/her partner and they go to the home of the victim to offer support, safety and legal options. The advocate is trained to provide key information and assist the victim through the process of prosecution. The advocate gives continued support if an Order of Protection is obtained or not. Whenever possible, the assailant is also informed of the consequences he now faces and the treatment programs available to help him change his behavior. The Mound and Minnetrista Police Chiefs have committed their departments to this intervention process. The police response includes: clear departmental guidelines on arresting when probably cause exists; contacting the Westonka Intervention Project when an arrest is made; referring victims to the project even if an arrest has not been made. The Westonka Intervention Project arranges child care and transportation when- ever necessary in order to maximize the accessibility of court services for victims. The project will escort victims and offenders to support groups. Arrangements and transportation to shelters, hospitals and housing is 'also provided. ' Evaluation The coordination of each agencies efforts in supporting the victim and assailant, the exchange of information between agencies and the client and, finally, the monitoring of agency policies and individual abusers compliance with court orders is an important step in our community. Data collected from the Duluth Intervention Program demonstrates the potential effect of this project: arrests in Duluth have increased five fold; conviction rates have increased from 20% to 80% of all arrests; and; 60% of abusers arre§ted under the program did not batter again in the next year. Data from Westonka Intervention Project's past two years of community service has shown that police have less reported calls on domestics, victims are seeking help sooner, and through counseling and support services, families are able to stay together while resolving their problems. Goals and Objectives The Westonka Intervention Project is operating under the belief that violence against any family member is a violation of their rights as human beings. Westonka Intervention Project believes that it is possible to stop much of the.family violence that is happening in our community through intervention. The Westonka Intervention Project places the responsibility for intervention in domestic assault on the police and criminal justice system rather than'the victim. The primary goals of the project are to develop an effective community response toward battering by the legal and social services in the Mound and Minnetrista areas. The objectives are as follows: 1. An increase in the percentage of probably cause arrests made by the Mound and Minnetrista Police Departments. 2. A reduction in repeated police involvement with families involved in our projects. 3. Community education about domestic violence. 4. In misdemeanor assault cases, an increase in the use of treatment for abusive behavior. 4. An increase in the use of support groups for the victims. Proposed Yearly Budget if Funding were Available. Salary $9,120.00 .5 Coordinator Grant Writer $2,400.00 (professional 40 hrs at $60.00 per hour) House Lease $1,500.00 per month (office, shelter, support groups) Copy Maching $1,800.00 (rebuilt) Annual Business Telephone charge $1,000.00 Printing $ 350.00 (Brochures, business cards, froms and training materials) Program Expenses $ 500.00 (Film and video purchases, speakers for training consultants) Postage $ 154.00 Mileage $ 400.00 (Volunteers and Project Coordinator) Equipment $2,000.00 (lO beepers at $16.00, batteries for 1 year) Child Care $1,000.00 (Victims and Advocates) Future Since the Mound, Minnetrista and Orono police work so closely together the WEstonka Intervention Project intends to expand the project to include the City of Orono. The project will be seeking funding for a shelter and paid staff personnel. Westonka Intervention Project Fund Sources for 1987 Westonka Crime Fund $100.00 Barb Thompford $125.00 St. Johns Women's Club $500.00 American Legion Womens Auxilary $100.00 Our Request Westonka Intervention Project is in need of many items that are one time purchase and will not make us dependent on any one source of funding. However, there are other items such as a paid staff and a shelter which would need funding annually in order to continue. However, if funding were completely cut, it is better the project did give service than not having existed at all. / 00.2. One only needs to ask the families that have already been helped. Before Westonka Intervention Project the potential of a healthy change in these same families would have been very low. In Summation 1. This budget is comparable to existing intervention projects for domestic violence. 2. After studying similar budgets and their requests of our neighboring cities, Westonka Intervention Projects proposal to the city was written. 3. Cities served, usually, are the main source of funding for these programs. I0o DIRECTORS RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Administrate over advocates 2. Training of our advocates. 3. Public awareness. 4. Support to advocates through regular meetings° 5. Victim support and follow-up. 6. Advocate scheduling. 7. Communication with City Officials. 8. Meeting with Board of Directors. 9. Networking with Hennepin County and Battered Women's Programs. lO. Record keeping of victim reports. 11. Fund-raising. 12. Victim Referrals WESTONKA INTERVENTION PROJECT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Daniel Hessburg (President) Brad Roy (Vice President) Mound Police Officer Mary Hurley (Treasurer) Director of Mound G.E.D. program Phyllis Jessen - Mound Council Member Dr. Jay Peterson - Local Optician Dr. Brian Jenjum - Local General Practitioner Dr. Ernie Swihart - Local Pediatrician Eric Gustafson - Minister, St. John's Lutheran Church Michael Woelffer - Minnetrista Resident James B. Dickinson - Lawyem IOoE GEN OLSON Senator 43rd District 132C State Office Building st. Paul, Minnesota 55155 (612) 296-1282 H o me: 6750 County Road 110 West Mound, Minnesota 55364 (612) 472-3306 Senate State of Minnesota March 9, 1987 Val Hessburg 3490 Lythrum Way Mound, MN 55364 Dear Val: I enjoyed visiting with you and the Shirley Hills students when you visited the Capitol. I hope you found the experience both educational and enjoyable. I was pleased to read about your and Dan's involvement with the Westonka Intervention Project in the Westonka Sailor. The approach you are ~using to help solve the problem of inter- family abuse is a good one. Please know that your efforts are most appreciated. Best wishes for continued success in all your many endeavors. Sincerely, Gon Olson State Senator GO/bk COMMITTEES · Education · Local and Urban Government · Energy and Housing SERVING: Deephaven, Eden Prairie (portions of), Excelsior, Greenwood, Long Lake, Minnetonka (portions of), Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, St. Bonifacius, Shorewood, Spring Park, Tonka Bay and Woodland PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT Public Safety Offices 7701 County Road 110 West Minnetrista, Minnesota 55364 612.446.1131 February 2, 1987 Craig A. Anderson Chief of Police Police/Fire/Ambulance Emergency: 911 Dispatcher.' 544-9511 Crime Stoppers: 45-CRIME Valerie Hessburg Director Westonka Intervention Project PO Box 34 Hound, ~ 55364 REs LETTER OF SUPPORT Dear Director Hessburg: It has come to my attention that the Westonka Intervention Project is in need of funding in order to contihue providing assistance to victims of family violence in our communities. On behalf of the St. Bonifacius and.Hinnetrista Public Safety Department, I want you Co know we whole- heartedly support the efforts of the project and.encourage citizens, community organizations and businesses to provide financial support. The proJecc has~ played a major role in assisting victims of family violence. A family crisis brings out deep emotion% when violence becomes a part of that crisis scars are left that may last a lifetime. This is when the Westonka Intervention ~dvocates are called upon. They are ready and willing to respond on a 24-hour basis. I believe because of the project's ability to respond during this critical time, victims have been able to find the help they need. Without the project our communities will lose these special people, the Advocates. When those victims cry out for help, who will respond? Law enforcement will always take care of the immediate concern, but the follow-up is when the band-aid is removed and the true healing process takes place. I trust that once the community becomes aware of the project's goals, objective and accomplishments, the financial crisis the project is facing will be resolved. "SEE IT, HEAR IT, REPORT IT" LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-37~ 1 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-~ EMERGENCY 911 January 22, 1987 Mrs. Valerie Hessburg 3490 Lythrum Hay Minnetrista, MN 55364 Re: Westonka Intervention Program Dear ValeFie, I am writing this letter in support of the Westonka Intervention Program. During the year of 1986, the Mound Police responded to 101 domestic situations. In 59 of those domestics there was a reported assault that had taken place. The availability of the intervention counselors greatly reduces the amount of time officers are needed at the scene. Officers can clear the scene with the knowledge that an intervention counselor will be making a contact with the victim and offering assistance. The counselors are very knowledgeable in services available ana are able to offer infor- mation to victims needing further help. The Westonka Intervention Program offers a very worthwhile and needed service to the citizens of Mound; and I thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, { Len Harrell, Chief MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT LH/sh 1984 thru..~986 Westonka Intervention statistics Married women with children ............ 138 Married women without children ............ 22 Single women with children ............ 33 Single women without children ............ 30 Marri6d men with children ............ 5 Married men without children~ ........... 2 Sibblings ............ 3 Total assisted ............ 233 BILLS .APRIL 1/4, '1987 Batch 87/4033 Batch 87/403/4 Computer Run dated q/3/87 Computer Run dated /4/9/8.7' 33,715./43 92,998.97 Brad Landsman Relmb for hdwe-flre dept First Trust St. Paul Bank Bond fee Hart!ns 66 Auctlon proceeds Reserves Htg costs 13.92 /438.75 2,172.20 30./46 TOTAL BI LLS 129,369.73 /oll Z 0 ¥ ~ T ~.~ I I I ! of,- I-- I.-- NN (:30 I--I-- oJoJ h Z 0 (..I h 0000 ZZZ~I 0000 ZZZZ: 0000[ 0000 i , ~¢d bJ tlJ LIJ UJ a) o0~Dffi ,o o, · -o(u o coco ZZZZ ::3 Z 0 ,.,J bJ ..J I-. 13: LU Z < 0 0 0000 ZZZZ 0000 0000 I! .! ZZ Z 0 'r: ),.: I-, oo ZZZZZZ w W UJ Z 0 :11 I I I I I I I I I II 000000~000~0 !1111111911111 I t~l LIJ LIJ niL. O. 000 000 I ! :1 ZZZZ ~o 0000 ~Z'ZZ 0000 ZZZZ 0000 ZZZZ' Z I.IJ ~ L~J LIJ Z Z~'ZZ >.. }- >., >- I-- I-- I-- I-- I ! Oo O0 LIJ fi. I- ~ r oo oo I~ I '~r~r Mr,1 ooooooooo ooooooooo ooooooooo 0 -r 0 o~, ~ ~al7 I I !/ I e 4~ oo · Ii Ii ! o bJ I gJ 0 UJ UJ Z D. LIJLIJLIJ m.r..a. 14 Z UJ z 0 b_ o >- u 0 Z 'r UJ ul 4~ 0 00000 00000 MMMMM Z 0 X ~,. UJ Z ,.J I- 0 oo oo I >- 0 0 o I. ...i 0JOJ 0~0~ oo 4:<: ZZ ooo oUI~ I !41' 010 41' 000 000 mLnLn I I hi ZZ ZZ LUUJ oo ~w Z UJ U,I -ir' U h, a Z oo oo tl, O0 O0 O0 mm oo : bJ Z 0 I-- i!l~ 0 o o 2[2[ o o I Z 0 bJ MMMMMMMMMM Iii I I 000000000000000000000000000 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM CITY OF ~0UHD Mound, Minnesota CASE NO. 87-623 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT FOR THE OPERATION OF A FAST FOOD, CONVENIENCE, DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT (CLASS II) LOCATED AT 2330 WlLSHIRE BOULEVAR0 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that.on'T~esday~Ap.rll 28, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall, $3ql May~ood .Road,.Mound, Minnesota,.a. hearing will be held on the issuance-of a conditlonal, use permit for the establishment of a C. lass II'.restaurant at 2330 Wilshire Boulevard. The proposed U~e consists of a Oomlno'~ Pizza, Inc. restaurant offering delivery and take-out food.. All persons.appearing at said hearing wI'l~l be given the opportunity to be heard. '.' Francene C. Ci-ark, Citf Clerk April 14, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MA~OR AND THE CIT~ MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW -. ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320 POLICE PATROLMEN WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year Union Contract with the Police Patrolmen; and WHEREAS, said contract would be in effective January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement with the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 (Police Patrolmen) to be effective January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. Copy of same is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember ,~ The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SER¥ICE, INC., LOCAL 35 LELS POLICE SUPERVISOR/SERGEANTS WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year Union Contract with the Police Supervisor/Sergeants; and WHEREAS, said contract would be effective January 1, ]987 through December 3], ]988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement with the Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc., Local 35 (Police Supervisor/Sergeants) to be effective January ], ]987 through December 3], ]988. Copy of same on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk ooo 1 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 7, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: Ed Shukle, City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk March Monthly Report There were two regular Council meetings in March. There was preparation for those meetings and then there were the minutes, 26 resolutions and items that need to be handled after the meetings. These items can take.alot of time to complete. I prepared Garden Leases for the three people in'town who use City lots for their gardens. This keeps-these lots neat and clean and not used as a dumping area. I continued to work on the tax forfeit parcels and they will be coming to the Council for dispostion in April. The final touches were finally put on the property Nell Weber wishes to purchase to gain access to the property he already owns and that will be on the Council Agenda in April. 'We continue to receive calls from citizens requesting information on vacant property that abutts their property. One such call was on a parcel of land on the corner of Dorcester and Tuxedo Blvd. In checking I found that there are two lots. Both were taken for street and utility purposes. Only one lot was needed. The other needed only a storm sewer easement and then could be released to be sold to the adjoining property owner. This will be on the Council Agenda in April. There is also a City owned parcel across from Grimm's Grocery that will be on the Agenda in April to be sold. This is half of Lot 16, Block 1~, Arden and was taken for street purposes when. Tuxedo Blvd. was under construction. We will still need to keep 30 feet that fronts on Brighton Blvd. for possible future expansion of that road, but we can sell the other portion which will help the property owner. This item will be a little easier because the City actually owns this property outright. It will be on the April Agenda. Page 2 March Monthly Report April 7, 1987 I had one meeting with Hennepin County on the new Optic Scan voting equipment. We completed a finished draft of equipment procedures. In April we will work on an election judges training manual. The Minnesota Clerks' and Finance Officers' Association had their annual conference from March 17-20. This was the 50th Anniversay of the association so some special activities were planned. We honored all the retired City Clerks. Barbara Heyman, past City Clerk in Mound, was present at the Banquet and received a Proclamation from the President of the Association. I was secretary of that association until this conference when I was elected Vice-President. Being Secretary, I had certain duties that had to be done for the conference, i.e. contact and line up vendors for Vendor Night, get all the Minutes which I wrote for the past year printed, wrote and had printed the Proclamations that was presented to all retirees. The Conference was attended by 265 of the 565 members of the association. We had sessions on the following: 1. Optical Scan Technology 2. Data Privacy 3. Election Laws 4. Gambling Laws 5. LegislatiVe Update 6. Round Table discussions with other Clerks 7. Managing Stress 8. Performance Management 9. Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness to name a few. This conference is put on by the University of Minnesota Department of Professional Development and Conference Services. It is designed to meet the needs of Minnesota clerks from large and small cities, with different responsibilities, and with varying years of experience. The sessions provide practical information and an opportunity for discussion with other clerks. I notified the Fire Contract cities of their total fire and rescue hours for 1986 and the percentage that will be incorporated into the. formula for figuring the 1988 Fire Contract. There are always numerous phone calls and questions from the residents. fc 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 9, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. March's Activity Report In Ma~ch we pumped 19,350,000 gallons, there were 3 new accounts, 2 turn-ons, 0 watermain breaks and 36 final readings. With road restrictions on this month construction was way down. We spent time in pumphouse 7 where we have had some problems with electrical equipment. We changed out the water meter at Lakewinds replacing the old 3" gear driven compound to a new 3" turbo. Our last pickup has arrived and is in service. Have also spent time on the Allied painting case, court was a real treat. SEWER DEPT. Sewer Department had one back-up this month with no major damage'. The crew spent time working in the 29 lift stations. 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 9, 1987 TO:. Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Joyce Nelson SUBJECT: March's Recycling During the month of March I've been working on the annual report for Hennepin County. In this report they want total cost of program, publicity strategies'used and copies of publicity materials, tonnage of material, participation rates, and any other recycling activities (such as church-sponsored or Boy Scout paper drives). For the year of 1986 225.94 tons of material was recycled from this area. Hennepin County as estimated that our total waste generated from this area is 3,862 tons. Hennepin County wanted us to recycle 4 percent of this or 154 tons, so as you can see we did better than expected, we recycled 6 percent of our waste generated. Also during March I was working on the tonnage payment program from Met. Council. Met Council will reinburse cities $4.00 per ton of recycled material picked up. From October 1, 1986 ~hru March 31, 87 the City recycled71.30 tons of material or $285.20./' March's pick-up was 12.82 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 6, 1987' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Geno Hoff Street Supt. March's Activity Report On Sunday March 1st we got about an 1" of snow during the night. I checked the streets at 6:30 a.m. I thought they were OK, I also called the police on the city radio and checked with them to see if they received any complaints about slippery roads, they didn't. About 9:30 a.m. the police called and said they received a complaint from the Fire Dept. that the roads were slippery. I called out the sanding crew immediately, we checked every street and didn't find much to sand. The next day we got a number of complaints, why we the City crew out sanding when it wasn't necessary. That goes to show you, your damned if you do and damned if you don't. The Street crew spent some time this month working on equipment. It takes about a week to get our sweepers and tankers ready for the spring clean-up. We dismantled the snowblower on the 20th and replaced it with the sidewalk broom. The 23rd we started to clean sidewalks. The 29th the street sweepers were on the road. The downtown, area is first, Commerce, Shoreline, Lynwood, Wilshire, Cypress and Bartlett, from there we moved to Three Points, we finished that area on Friday the 27th. We had some cold weather move in over the weekend, so we're on hold until it warms up. EQUIPMENT REPAIRS We had to do some plumbing repairs on the blue tanker, also a pancake blew out of the brake system. 4 new tires for the sweepers, 2 new sprockets and drive chain for the main broom, also new wheel bearing. These repairs were for the old sweeper An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of ~;ace, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. Page 2 SIGN DEPT. We moved our signs into the old Island Park Hall because we just didn't have enough room in the garage. We are using about t/3 of the floor space now and when we get the rest of the Christmas Decorations it will be about 3/4 filled. In the porcess of moving the signs we checked inventory and discarded a number of damaged and non-regulation signs. STREET MATERIALS PURCHASED & TRANSPORTED 255 tons of Buckshot April 6, 1987- CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: March's Activity Report Thism6nth as the new replacement vehicles were delivered the older vehicles were transferred to other departments where they could still be effectively used and still be of service in other capacities. These changes included Unit #1 (76 Ford Street), Unit #3 (82 Chev. 4 X 4 with plow Water) and Unit #9 (80 Chev. pick-up Sewer) these were taken over by the Parks Department. All trucks had to be stripped of lights, radios, tools, etc and installed in the new equipment. Other changes included the S-10 pick-up owned by the Parks Department, this was taken by the Police Department for their CSO truck. The old CSO truck was given to the shop, as there was no vehi61e for this Dept. The Street Dept. also was given an 84 Ford LTD (old 841) that was replaced by 1 of the 2 87 Pontiacs that were bought by the Police Dept. In other shop work with Spring arriving it was time to bring'the sweepers out. Without warm storage it is necessary to completely service, as they can't be left work .ready while in storage. This includes changing of all fluids (water, hydralic fluid, oil, filters etc.) The 1970 Elgin sweeper received the most extensive work as it was found that many parts were severly worn such as sprockets, chains, etc. The Water Dept. received 2 new pick-ups, 1 4 X 4 and 1 2 wheel drive, both of which had to be set up with radios (2-way), warning lights and tool boxes. A new service entry door was installed in the shop as the old one was in bad shape and had to be shot, it gave many years of service and I know it will be missed. ]O33 An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. TO: City Manager and Members of the C|ty Counci] FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official SUBJECT: March, 1987 Monthly Report During the month of March, the. Inspection Department attended one Planning Com- mission meeting on March 9th, two City Council meetings on March IOth and March 24th. I was scheduled for time off work the.first week of March. Marge and I worked Saturday, March 28th, 1987 to purge files and basically clean our office and traded time off from our regular scheduled hours. 'The following inspections were conducted during the month of March: * Site Inspections 32 Footing Inspections 10 Framing Inspections Insulation Inspections 8 Drywall Inspections 9 Final Inspections 4O Progress Inspections 21 Erosion/Grading Moving Inspection **Heating Inspections 15 Plumbing Inspections 15 Fire Sprinkler/Suppression Complaints ,l~,. TOta1 174 Monthly report was submitted to City Manager during the month of March. Zoning reports were submitted to the Planning Commission. Two plats were reviewed with the applicants for the City process to obtain plat approval. Road restrictions were put on for construction vehicles on the First of March. The larger number of final inspections made were updates on older permits that had not been called in for final inspections. Writing of correspondence, resolu- tions, and Planning Commission reports were sent out from the Department. Corres- pondence received during the month were reviewed; recording was done of the sub- stitute inspection services~ records and daily inspection logs were made. Condemnation reports were filed with the City Prosecutor for a house in the High- land area after vandalism of the vacant building. A report was submitted to the March Monthly Report April 6, 1987 - Page 2 Park Department on the cOndition of a Park building on Tyrone Road. Meetings were held with Public Works and. Balboa Minnesota to discuss building revisions for their floor drains to prevent, accidental spills into Morton Channel. I attended a BUilding Inspectors lunc.h~in Medina with the topic from the State Fire Marshal,s~Office being'"coordinatlng of the.building'and fire codes for com- patible enforcement". Plan review was conducted during the month for three new homes, the new Smith Heating building, facility, Domino's Pizza, Grimm's Store, and several home addi- tions. Total number of building permits issued in the month of March was 16 with a valua- tion of $272,650. A copy of the Building Activity Report is attached. The total valuation for the year of 1987 is $1,559,706. In addition, our Department prepared the monthly calendar 6f the April City meetings and events. JB/ms Attachment * Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commission requests and requirements, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as, no building permi.t, recheck of compliance notice, review status of various sites for the City Prosecutor, pre-construction meetings at the site for building permit appli- cants .or realtors,, fire damage and periodic commercial inspection updates. ** The heating inspections during the construction of project are included under the framing and final inspections of the building. The heating installations men- tioned are for separate equipment-being plac.ed in homes and businesses. -Several of the inspections for framing involve framing and insulation of the same structure. $3~ 1 t~ay~ood Road Street Address .~ound, ,N. 55~ Ct~and " BUI~ING A~IV~ ' ' ' '-" ~,.d ~a~ch ~ ~a~ ..... ' ~NSIRU~ON (F~ff~' 237,500, 000. To~a! N~n. Re~JdentlM · RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS Rel~dent~el , MONTH AND ) DATE ~ONV~$1ONS TO~II Co,lye rSlon~ ou~ Inst. Total Dem~!.~- -~- i 'rOT~ 3q,950. 200 200. 27~,650. i90,318. Year t~ Dele 1 Yem Te Dill 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 1, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER MARCH 1987 MONTHLY REPORT / 37 As I anticipated our sales for the month of March were down from March a year ago. This year March sales were $55,673. Last year March sales were $59,484. The fact that Easter fell in March of last year, the fact that last year at the end of March we had some unseasonably warm weather, and the fact that last year in March we had one extra Friday's business, all contributed to this negative discrepancy. I expect that April of this year should conversely be far better than April of last year when our'sales totaled $59,601. At the end of March I hired one extra part time employee in preparation for the upcoming spring and summer months. His name is Jori Farley. He seems to be a courteous individual and he has been catching on to our methods and procedures rather quickly. March was a time for spring cleaning around the liquor store. In addition to our regular cleaning routine we began working on washing shelves. At this point in time, we are nearly finished with only a couple of shelves ]eft. What a relief! This summer, I believe, will bring an even greater sales in the area of wine coo]ers. Wine coo]ers have been a product who's growth has escalated tremendously over the last three years. To keep'up with this trend, we are going to bring in even more types of coo]ers this Apri]. Our problem is space. Where do we put them? So Julie and I have been rearranging things to expand our Wine coo]er selection. When we are through, I know we will have the largest variety of coolers in this vicinity and perhaps one of the most extensive sections in the Metro area. The MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE ASSOCIATION sent me a packet of material dealing with the Mandatory Deposit issue. I am attaching copies of this information along with-my report. I recommend that all of you read it over carefully. When I presented my annual report before you on March 24, 1987, I briefly touched upon this subject. It seemed apparent at the time that some of you were in favor of the Mandatory Deposit bill. Well, the Mandatory Deposit proponents have intrbduced their bill in both houses at the last possible moment to prevent our industry from launching a successful defense. On very shor.t notice, Liquor Store March Report April 1, 1~$7 Page 2 Senate File 959 has already cleared subcommittee on a tie vote, without recommendation, but was sent forward to the full committee by a special procedure. The Municipal Liquor Store Association suggests we follow up with letters and City Council resolutions. The companion bill in the house is HF 1085. Remember, under this bill we could end up as a redemption center with all the extra costs of additional space and employees. A very detailed legislative package is enclosed to assist your legislative contact. If you want to remain in the retail liquor business and provide tax free services (seal coating) for the citizens of Mound, then I strongly urge you to do what you can to oppose the mandatory deposit bill. Time.is critical. The next senate hearing could be the week of April 6th. Here is the list of the Senate Committee members: Environment and Natural Resources (18) Chairman: Willet Vice Chair: Office No: 111 Telephone # Meets: T, W, F; room 112, 1-3 PM Members: Berg Knaak Bernhagen Laidlg Dahl Larson Davis Lessard Frederickson, Dr. Dahl 296-1113 Merriam Morse Novak Olson Marty Stumpf Wegscheid Willet Peterson, R.W. JK:ls Minnesota Industry/ Labor Recycling Coalition Committed to comprehensive waste management. March 20, 1987 Dear Legislator: Proponents of a mandatory deposit bill claim it will reduce solid waste and use of landfills, ~help recycling programs, raise money for the state, curb plastic bottle use, reduce litter and ' increase employment. Sound too good to be true? It is. In reality, a deposit law would: · reduce the solid waste stream by less than one percent, at bes t; · skim profitable aluminum from voluntary recycling programs, threatening their viability; · cost the state as much as $30 million to $60 million in administrative costs and lost sales and excise taxes; · not address the cause of litter; · cause the elimination of many high-skill jobs. In addition, mandatory deposit will raise the price of a six-pack 15 cents for soft drinks and 25 cents for beer, costing Minnesotans $90 million a year. Lost sales due to the higher prices will result in lost sales and excise taxes for the state. In addition, other subsidy from the general fund is sure to be required over and above all the revenues it might generate. Collection is costly and unsanitary for small businesses. The enclosed information package provides additional detail. It also suggests responsible alternatives that focus on the real problem -- reducing all components of the waste stream. As you can see, mandatory deposit is a costly, ineffective approach to comprehensive waste management. We encourage you to learn more about it and consider its harmful consequences. Minnesota Industry/Labor Recycling Coalition Minnesota Industry/ Labor Recycling Coalition led to comprehensive waste management. DO SUPPORTERS OF MANDATORY DEPOSITS HAVE ALL THE ANSI~IERS? When proponents of mandatory deposit laws present their rationales to you, here are some questions to pose to them. The answers below' provide the facts: Question: What have the extra administrative and consumer costs' been in other states with mandatory deposits? A: The Detroit-area Food Dealers Association has estimated the total cost of a mandatory deposit to the Michigan economy was $250 million in 1979 alone. In Iowa, the Des Moines Reqister reported in August 1980 that a mandatory deposit cost Iowans at least $20 million during its first year. Question: A: After we pay administrative costs, how much revenue will really be left -- or could this cost the state money? After deducting administrative costs and sales tax losses from the anticipated $10 million the state hopes to collect, Minnesota could suffer a net loss of as much as $34 million to $60 million. Question: How much did forced deposits raise consumer costs in the nine states with deposit laws? A: On average, mandatory deposit laws in nine states raised beer prices by 25 cents per six-pack and soft drink prices by 15 cents per six-pack-- not incl-uding the deposit or handling fee. 'Question= How many beverage container manufacturing jobs do we have in Minnesota? A: In glass and can manufacturing there are about 1500 jobs that could be negatively affected or eliminated by a mandatory depos i t. Question: How much have mandatory deposits reduced solid waste in states with such laws? A: According to the Metropolitan Council, the range in applicable states is a 3-8% reduction in solid waste. -2- Question: If aluminum cans, the most profitable recycling component, leave the collection chain, won't this kill voluntary recycling programs? A~ Yes, since aluminum cans are the "gold" in the waste stream they subsidize the recycling of less profitable materials such as newspapers. Question: With a 10-cent deposit plus added handling will we stop Minnesotans from crossing the purchases? costs, how border for A: We can't. Moreover, it will be very dif. ficult and costly to maintain enforcement measures to keep M~nnesotans fr.om redeeming bags of containers including cans and bottles purchased in other states. Question: Is it constitutional for the state to keep unredeemed depos i ts? A~ It certainly raises serious legal questions. No other state with a mandatory deposit keeps the forfeited redemption money. Rather, the money goes back into the collection and distribution system to offset increased handling costs. Que s ti on: How many times have restrictive container bills been introduced in the Minnesota Legislature-- but not passed? A: From 1955 through 1986, 48 bills have been introduced in the legislature and all were ultimately rejected as unworkable or i neff ect i ye. Question: If we truly want to reduce the waste stream, why aren't paper, plastic containers and steel cans addressed so that we have a comprehensive waste reduction program? A~ This is a good question -- we'd like to hear the answer ours elves I dinnesota Industry/ 'abor Rec fcling oalition to comprehensive waste management. ~..RE~S ~,AT OTHER STATES HAVE FOUND OUT ABO~T MANDATORY DEPOSIT LAb'S .__ · ..... ,.._.. v~.v ,it.,~_ a shortaue of space and a surplus of cTonc~°r~ga~eU~ a~'w~n~ a~nst the s~ate's bottle law, which was unca ped 10 weeks ago. And numerous side effects of the law have- cauah~t people off guard, especially, be.e.r .dri.nkers; who are now paying ~s much as 25 percent more ~or gnelr Drew. -- Boston Globe "The Bottle Law already has been proved a flop, .a mess,, an on us all, a costly folly and a revelatlon of the as s au1 t . . ~ nonsense of the whole zdea that led to zts passage. -- Lowell, Massachusetts Sun "Beer sales have dropped 50 to 60 percent in some Massachusetts liquor stores whose customers have fled across the New H~mpshire border to avoid 5-cent per bottle deIx)sits-" -- Boston Herald-American "The ~bottle lawt cost Iowans at least $20 million during its first year -- and that is a conservative 'estimate." -- Des Moines Register "This is the most ex~ensive, least ' efficient anti-litter tax in world history. ' -- New York Daily News IN MINNESOTA, LET tS LEARN FROM THE EXPERIENCES OF OTHER STATES.: MANDATORY DEPOSIT LA~3 ARE COSTLY ADMINISTRATIVE NIGHTMARES I 'Minnesota Industry/ Labor Recycling Coalition Committed ~o comprehensive waste management. Coalition Members M~nnesota Grocers Association Minnesota Agri-Growth Association Minnesota Soft Drink Association Minnesota Beer Wholesalers Association Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association Minnesota Municipal Liquor Stores Association Minnesota Brewers Association Cold Spring Brewing Company G. Heileman Brewing Company August Schell Brewing Company The Stroh Brewery Company Miller Brewing Company Adolph Coors Company - Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry_ United Steel Workers of America Local 7796-2127 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers 'District 77 (Eag. an) International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 924 (Mankato) Minnesota D.R.I .V.E. Glass Packaging Institute Anchor Glass Container Can Manufacturers Institute Minnesota Wine and Spirits Wholesalers Sunny Hill (Hibbing) Ed Phillips & Sons Johnson Brothers, Inc. Quality Wine & Spirits, Inc. Griggs-Co.oper, Inc. Bellboy Corporation The Wine Institute The Beer Institute Minnesota Industry/ Labor Recyclin§ Coalition to comprehensive waste management. MANDATORY DEPOSIT: REVENUE GAIN OR DRAIN? Will the State of Minnesota really gain $10 m~11[on a year unredeemed beverage containers? In reality, a mandatory deposit will drain from $34 million to $60 million annuall.y from the state treasury, making a deposit law a hidden tax increase for every Minnesotan. BEST CASE SCENARIO* REVENUE EXPENSES WORST CASE SCENARIO* REVENUE EXPENSES $64 ¢400 ~,000 $Tr000w000 57,000,000 5% of con- tainers are] not redeeme~ REVE~S: $7,000,000 ~41r400rO00 $35,000,000 Low range operating cost .for 600 redemption centers $2,500,000 Non'deposit redemptions $1,100,000 $55,000,000 High range operating cost.for 900 redemption' centers $4,200,000 Administratn. costs with pr ot ect i OhS agai ns t non- depos i t redemptions $4,000,000 Lost sales/ excise taxes Administratn. $2,8oo,ooo I I of con- [ $1,2oo,ooo. Lost sales/ ! [ tainers_ are ] IN°n--de.p~.sl~ xcise taxes [ ! not redeemec~ I reoemp=zon e TOTAL " ' T~AL ' ~ TOTAL EXPENSES ~ REVENUES ~ EXPENSES $41,400,000 NET STATE LOSS: (~;34r400,000) $4,200,000 $64,400,000 STATE LOSS: (~60 ~200 r 000,) *A detailed cost analysis of the proposed mandatory de. posit in Minnesota conducted by Harold O. Davidson, former senzor consultant for Arthur Young on beverage industry and collection/distribution problems and now principal of Davidson & Associates, forms the basis for the best and worst case scenarios. Minnesota Industry/ Labor Recycling COalition Committed to comprehensive waste management. MINNESOTAtS I~ECYCLING SOLUTION IS WORKING STATEWIDE In. Minnesota today, a comprehensive waste management program is strong and active across the state. METROPOLITAN I~ECYCLING PROGRAMS Since 1980, Minnesota Soft Drink (MSD) Recycle has processed more than 33,000 tons of beverage cans and glass containers. The program has paid recyclers over $6 million. · MSD Recycle also services over 35 in-store reverse vending machines at over 30 locations in the Twin Cities. · Since 1986, Super Cycle has processed more than 700 tons of residential recyclables frown curbsides per month. In Ramsey County, 75% of households will receive curbside pickup of recyclable materials this year. In Minneapolis; collection of recyclable materials is available to 100% of households. GREATER MINNESOTA RECYCLING P~ The Minnesota Recycling Directory, distributed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, was the source of the following i hf ormat i on: · Recycling programs are active in approximately 225' communities in 73 counties outside the Twin Cities. · Across greater Minnesota, there are about 450 recycling. centers and drop boxes. · The largest outstate ~opulation centers are well represented with recycling sites: -- Alexandria: 7 sites -- Austin: 12 -- Brainard: 7 -- Duluth: 9 -- Faribault/Northfield: 13 -- International Falls: 5 -- Mankato/New Ulm: 12 -- Marshall: 4 sites -- Owatonna: 10 -- Red Wing/Cannon Falls: 11 -- Rochester: 13 -- St. Cloud: 13 -- Thief River Falls: 4 -- Winona: 6 Minnesota Industry/ Labor Recycling 'Coalition to comprehensive waste management. March 20, 1987 Dear Legislator: Proponents of a mandatory deposit bill claim it will reduce solid waste and use of landfills, help recycling programs, raise money for the state, curb plastic bottle use, reduce litter and increase employment. Sound too good to be true? It is. In reality, a deposit law would: · reduce the solid waste stream by less than one percent, at best; · skim profitable aluminum from voluntary-recycling programs, threatening their viability; · cost the state as much as $30 million to $60 million in administrative' costs and lost sales and excise taxes; · not address the cause of litter; · cause the elimination of many high-skill jobs. In addition, mandatory deposit will raise the price of a six-pack 15 cents for soft drinks and 25 cents for beer, costing Minnesotans $90 million a year. Lost sales due to the higher prices will result in lost sales and excise taxes for the state. In addition, other subsidy from the general fund is sure to be required over and above all the revenues it might generate. Collection is costly and unsanitary for small businesses. The enclOsed information package provides additional detail. It also suggests responsible alternatives that focus .on the real problem -- reducing all components of the waste stream. As you can see, mandatory deposit is a costly, ineffective approach to comprehensive waste management. We encourage you to learn more about it and 'consider its harmful consequences. Minnesota Industry/Labor Recycling Coalition Minnesota Industry/ Labor Recycling Coalition Committed to comprehensive waste management. MANDATORY DEPOSIT IS A COSTLY, INEFFECTIVE APPROACH TO~P/) COMPREHENSIVE ~STE MANAGEMENT A mandatory deposit law in Minnesota will only hurt consumers, small business, industry and the state. It will not noticeably reduce the solid waste stream or litter. But a mandatory deposit will take money out of the state treasury and the pockets of every Minnesota resident. It will wound small business and eliminate jobs. It will cripple effective recycling programs active in 80 Minnesota counties. Deposit advocates offer many arguments for a mandatory deposit -- arguments that are short-sighted and based on myth. The reality is quite different~ MYTH= A deposit law will dramatically reduce solid waste going to our landfills. REALITY= A deposit law will have almost no impact on reducing solid waste. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states that nationwide mandatory deposit laws would only reduce the country's solid waste by 2 percent. In Minnesota, the Metropolitan Council has determined that a DEPOSIT LAW WOULD REDUCE THE TOTAL METROPOLITAN H~STE STREAM BY LESS T~AN 1 PERCENT= Total Beverage Container Waste and Impact of 90% and 95% Beverage Container Redemption 3% ~ 2.69% 2.56% 2% 1% o o~ o~ 2.42% Total Beverage Container Waste 95% Container Redempt i on 90% Container R edempt i on (Source: Metropolitan Council) Iv 7 Moreover, a mandatory deposit does not guarantee that recyclable materials won't be landfilled. Vermont started a mandatory deposit for glass, then discovered low demand for recqvered glass. Where did many of the returned bottles go? Straight to the landfills. MYTH: A deposit law will help voluntary recycling programs. REALITY: A mandatory deposit will remove aluminum, the. most profitable commodity, from the collection chain. Skimming the "gold" from the waste stream will cripple recycling programs in about 80 Minnesota counties. In our state last year, consumers recycled 60% of aluminum cans, which subsidized recycling of paper and other lower-profit items. M~H: A deposit law will raise $10 million a year through unredeemed deposits for the state. REALITY: Minnesota could suffer a net state loss of $34 million: The extensive administration by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) of the deposit program including 500-80'0 redemption centers will quickly eat up money from unredeemed deposits -- and may require money from the general revenue fund besidesl Projections show that administrative expenses and lost sales and excise taxes could take $34-60 million from the state treasury. M~TH: A deposit law will curb plastic bottle use. REALITY: Since a deposit law does not address plastic containers, consumers -- out of sheer convenience -- will buy more plastic bottles, which will end up in our landfills or be burned. History in nine deposit states reveals a major shift away from glass -- to plastic. MYTH: A deposit law will substantially reduce litter. REALITY: Mandatory deposit laws in nine states, most of which passed the legislation for litter reduction, have had a minimal impact on overall litter reduction even though beverage litter was reduced. In Oregon, urban litter dropped by only 1% Under deposit laws. Michigan's litter control budget actually increased by 30% -- two years after forced deposits became law. Minnesota legislative tours to mandatory deposit states such as Oregon and Vermont and even' to litter control states like Washington revealed that Minnesota was already a cleaner state. MYTH: A deposit law will increase employment. REALITY: Mandatory deposit laws create some low-paying jobs to process returnables, but they also eliminate jobs of highly skilled workers. At Anchor Glass in Shakopee, the $9 million payroll could disappear through 400 skilled workers losing their jobs because of deposit laws. The Brockway plant in Rosemount closed in 1985 due largely to packaging changes caused by other states' mandatory deposits. EVEN MORE ENLIGHTENING IS WHAT DEPOSIT ADVOCATES DON'T SAY... FACT: Deposit.laws raise costs for consumers. In Minnesota, consumers could pay an extra $90 million each year i n added · . handling costs resulting from a mandatory deposit. Not ~ncludlng the d.eposit or handling fee, nine states with a mandatory d.eposlt, saw beer prices rise by 25 cents per six-pack and soft dr~nk prices by 15 cents per six-pack. FACT: Dedicating unredeemed deposits to the state is a hidde tax increase and it raises serious legal questions, n In all other states, this money has stayed in the collection and distribution system to help offset the added expenses of .operating under, deposit laws. Nowhere else in the nation does the state confiscate this money. FACT: A deposit law hurts small business. There are increased expenses at each stage of the collection . process. Each can and bottle must be handled at both the retail a.nd_wholesale levels, dr amati call- WhOlesalers · ~ ..~=~ng laoor costs £or and retailers. Also;.they must find ad.ditional space to handle empties. And then storing returned containers frequently creates sanitation problems, attracting roaches and 'rats to these neighborhood locations. In addition, businesses along state borders are often negatively affected by deposit laws. In Iowa, retail border Sales of beer fell 20% and in' Michigan border sales of beverages plummeted 50 to 80 percent. THE SMA~ 'ALTERNATIVE= INCREASED SUPPORT FOR RECYCLING A mandatory deposit is not the best method for achieving comprehensive waste management. The Metropolitan Council states that beverag.e containers ~are only 3% of the metropolitan waste. Why do deposit advocates ~gnore the other 97 percent? Beverage Container Waste as Component of Total Metropolitan Waste Stremu 3% (Bev?rage 90% (Paper, plastics, etc.) (Source: Metropolitan Council) I (Other glass, aluminum and iron containers) A mandatory deposit does not address the total solid waste stream -- only a very small percentage of it. And a mandatory deposit only reduces the total waste stream by less than 1 percent. Our conclusion: forced deposits are a lot of expense and effort for I percent. In contrast, waste reduction, reuse, recycling and burning programs can address 100% of our solid waste problems. U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson points out that EPA figures show that beverage cans and bottles are only 5% of the nation's solid waste. "If that is the case," he says, "then we should not launch a separate program which only addresses itself to 5% of the problem." The Waste Management Act of 1980 placed Minnesota on a road to total, comprehensive solid waste management. Not just 1% or 3% or even 7% -- but 100 percent! The key to this strategy is recycling. And curbside programs in highly populated areas and recycling centers in ~ess densely populated areas are the keys to r ecyc 1 ing. Recycling programs are already showing success. We have come a long way with voluntary recycling in Minnesota. Over 60% of aluminum cans are being recycled today. In 1980 it was only 20 percent. Paper recycling has increased 50% 'since 1980. Since 1980, more than $50 million has been paid to Minnesotans for recycled aluminum, steel, paper, glass and plastic. That's progress! Recycling programs are strong and active. About 75% of all Ramsey County households will receive curbside pickup of recyclable materials this year. In Minneapolis, recycling collection is available to 100% of households. In outstate Minnesota, approximately 450 recycling programs exist in about 225 communities in 73 counties. More marketing and information programs are the answer. Many communities throughout urban and rural Minnesota have active programs to inform and educate residents about recycling. Other marketing approaches can be implemented, such as a "lottery" conducted in Rockford, Illinois where $1000 is randomly awarded to a resident who participates in source separation; the Rockford household recycling rate has increased significantly due to this program. RECYCLING IS THE ANSWER TO COMPREHENSIVE HASTE MANAGEMENT. 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 1, 1.987 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTOR~ PARKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT, MARCH PARKS DEPARTMENT OPERATION General With an early spring, my activity has been centered mainly in two areas, the Commons dock applications, and park clean up. Currently, I do not have any additional help in the maintenance area. The first seasonal employee returning.will be John Taffe on March 30th. Then Bob Johnson will return in mid April. The Mowing crew will not begin until June 1. So at the start of this spring and summer season we have a lot Of work to be performed; park repair and cleanup, rip rapping, grass seeding and many other tasks. These will have to be set aside if the weather is real condusive to grass growing because the mowing crew will not be here until June 1. Commons Docks With the early ice out, the docks system has seen a lot of activity. Dell Rudolph, the Dock Inspector, has returned to work one week early this year to help with the questions and applications. The docks program over the next few weeks will demand a lot of time. Dell will be pro- cessing the 1987 applications, staking out dock sites, inspecting docks, helping provide a list of areas to be rip rapped, and reporting to the Parks Commission. Cemetery Howar Simar will be returning this year as the care taker of Union Cemetery. We ~ave received compliments on the tree trimming done. The area is looking very nice. Tree Removal March has seen $1045. in tree removal. This was for five trees felled, one forced removal and brush and tree trunk removals. LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle, City Manager ~ Len Harrell, Chief of Police~ Monthly Report for April, 1987 STATISTICS The police department responded to 713 calls for service in the month of March. The first quarter of 1987 indicates an increase of 482 contacts over the same period in 1986. Calls for Part I offenses were 31; including 3 criminal sexual conduct, 8 burglaries, 1 assault, 2 vehicle thefts, and 17 larcenies. Part II offenses accounted for 78 calls; including 7 child abuse/neglect, 19 criminal damage to property, 3 narcotics violations, 2 liquor law violations, 6 DWI, 5 simple assaults, 6 domestics (2 with assaults), and 11 harassment complaints, 10 runaway/incorrigibility, and 9 other violationm. The patrol division issued 271 adult citations; including 34 parking vio- lations. Juveniles received 36 citations. A total of 232 warnings were issued. There was 1 adult arrested for felonies and 7 juveniles. Seventeen adults were arrested for misdemeanors and 12 juveniles. The department responded to 24 medical emergencies, 3 property damage accidents, and 2 personal injury accidents. One hundred and five animal complaints were answered. A total of $10,814 in assorted property was stolen in March;'of which $3,072 was recovered. II. INVESTIGATION March was again a busy month for investigations. Ten cases of abuse/neglect were investigated accounting for 35 hours of investigative time. Addition- ally, Sgt. Hudson and Off. Grand continued the follow-up of a criminal sexual assault situation involving a number of local juveniles. Time was also spent investigating a harassing communication, a burglary, 2 damage to properties, an assault, a disorderly conduct, and a theft. III. MANPOWER Officers used a total of 17 shifts for a variety of time off. Five days of comp-time were used, 4 sick days, and eight vacation days. Officer Grand was shifted to work plain-clothes 4 shifts during the month. IV. OVERTIME Approximately 32 hours of overtime were used in March. Part of the over- time was to cover for officer illnesses and the remainder was for court overtime and late breaking calls. V. TRAINING Officers attended 104 hours of training during the month of March. The schools included constitutional law, animal control, and the spring chief's conference. VI. POLICE RESERVES The police reserves donated 192 hours of service to the department for the month; Their calls included 2 call outs, 2 community service functions, ride alongs, and reserve squads..The reserves currently have approximatley $7,000 in their account and continue to be primarily self-sufficient. MONTH ACTIVITY SUMMARY POLICE/CRIMEACTIVn REP0 T '- 'MARCH ,,. YEARI. Hazardous Citations Non-Hazardous Citations Hazardous Warnings Non-Hazardous Warnins~ Verbal Warnings ' Par_~ Citations DWI OVER .10 ~Accidents Personal In'u_q.~Accidents Accidents 'Adult Felon~_Arrests Adult NiSdemean~r Arrests Adult Misdemeanor Citations Juvenile Felony__Arrests Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations Part I Offenses Part II Offenses Medicals Animal Com~__laints 0ther General Investi ----7 ~tions T~IS 193. 54' 60 113 94 34 6 2 3 2 0 2 14 10 7 12 8 31 78 24 105 453 THIS TO DATE 430 178 144 375 220 136 33 24 23 9 0 23 92 25 22 28 13 91 216 48 295 1,225 Assists 37 3O 12 135 34 ll 0 134 31 ll ?0 1,132 Homicide Criminal Sexual, Conduct 3 1 2 I 5 ,Robber~ Assault 1 1 1 Bur81ar~ 8 [ 1 1 ,Larceny 17 1 1 1 Vehicle Theft 2 2 .Arson '- TOTAL 31 1 5 4 I 7 Child AbuSe/NeRlect 7 7 ! l' Forgery/NSF Checks 1 1 1 ,Criminal Damage to Property 19 3 Weapons ,Narcotic Laws 3 3 3 Liquor Laws 2 2 1 2 Dl~rl 6 6 6 Simple Assault 5 1 . 1 "1 Domestic Assault 2 2 2 ~omestics (No Assault) 4 ~arassment 11 3 1 1 ~unaway/Incorrigibility/Tr,,s.cy 10 7 7 Public Peace 1 1 ~11 Other Offenses 7 4 2 2 5IrAL 78 15 28 17 ' 12 · ~operty Damage Accidents 'ersonal Injury Accidents "atal Accidents [edicals 24 mimal Complaints 105 [utual Aid 17 ~ther General Investigations 453 ~OTAL 604 ,OTAL ACTIVITIES 713 , C i .ty MOUND Month C I'~AT I ONS L H.~CH ADULT DWi or OUI Hore than .10~ BAC Careless/Reckless 0rivin9 JUV 0rivin9 After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speedin9 No DL or Expired DL Restriction on OL Improper, Expired, or No Plates Illegal Passing ~Violations Fallure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving_the Scene No Insurance · 'or Unsaf~ Turn Pa~king'Vi61ations Crosswalk Oo~dinances Oerelict Autos His~ellaneous Tags TOTALS WARNINGS No Insurance Traffic ~ent Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Other TOTAL ARREST~ 6 2 1 9 8 136 1 2 l& 1 8 16 11 34 1 3 18 271 102 2 Fe I ony 14i sdemeano~ 1 2 1.. 1 1 1 "1 36 20 PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SU~tARY ITEM Bikes Snowmobiles Boats, Hotors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. Jewelry & Precious Metals Guns Home Furnishings Radio & Electronic Equlpment Vehicles & Vehlcle Equipment Hlscellaneous .TOTAL STOLEN $ 322 '2,000 470 518 5,800 1,704 $10,814 RECOVERED $ 3,000 72 3,072 MOUND POLICE RESERVES MONTHLY HOURS MARCH 1987 OFFICER ECO RS RA B. HAWKS 1.5 D. THOMPSON 6 B. BROWN 2.5 8 R. VOGEL 45 D. ST. CYR 10 D. NICCUM 4 2.5 43.5 C. STAHLBUSCH 2 TOTAL 5.5 5 112.5 TR 6 5 17.5 15.5 31.5 ECO - EMERGENCY CALL OUT TRANSPORTS RS - RESERVE SQUAD RA - RIDE ALOING W/REGULAR OFFICER TR - TRAINING TAKEN GUN TRAINING IN - INSTUCTION GIVEN NO INSTUCTION GIVEN THIS MONTH CS - COMMUNITY SERVICE DETAILS DANCE FOR HEART HIGH SCHOOL DANCE AD - ADMINISTRATIVE HOURS IN CS 4.5 3.5 6.5 - 14.5 AD 10 10 3 2~ T 22 21 14 45 16 74 17.5 192 PREF'ARED BY, DEBBIE THOMPSON, SGT. OFFICER B. HAWKS D. THOMPSON R. VOGEL D. ST. CYR D. NICCUM B. BROWN C. STAHLBUSCH TOTAL MOUND POLICE RESERVES SEVERANCE PAY MARCH 1987 AMOUNT DEPOSITED 5.00 5.00 10.00 TOTAL 196.50 215.00 252.50 115.00 90.00 65.00 20.00 952.00 PREPARED BY o ~OUND FIRE DEPARTMENT HONTHLY'ACTIVITY REPORT THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR ~ I~'~ 'MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE ~ONTH OF /'l~~ ~ O / NO. OF CALLS MOUND - FIRE EMERGENCY M'TONKA BEACH - FIRE EMERGENCY MINNETRISTA - FIRE EMERGENCY ORONO - FIRE EMERGENCY SHOREWOOD - FIRE EMERGEHCY SPXING PA~K - F~RE EMERGENCY MUTUAL AID FIRE . EMERGENCY TOTAL FIRE CALLS _ " TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS CO~CA~ RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL G~SS & MISCELLANEOUS -Au~o FALSE ALARM No. OF HOURS - MOUND FI~ EMERGENCY ~O~AC - HT~ .Ce .Fl~ EMERGENCY TOTAC '-M'T~STA FI~E ' EHE~ENCY TOTA~ - O~ONO Fl~ · * * TOTAL - SHO~WOOD F~E E~NCY TOTAC -SP. PA~K F~RE EMERGENCY* -MUTUAC A~D F~ ~E~NCY TOTAC TOTAL DRILL HOURS TOTAL FIRE HOURS TOTAL FIRE ~ EMERGENCY HOURS Mound, ]~.tan~sota ,~ . . FOR MO~H OF/~'/~ M~,/~ ~ ~ R..~'ORT : . ~ .. DATE' DATE DRILLS DRILL MAIN. TOTAL 'HOURLY ,. } O. Anderson ' ~' J. Beauchamp , ".G. Oarvais ,- .~ ~. .... .. 6. Johnso~ . ~',,, · · ' · Y~ 6. oo ~/~- . ~. To~V ~ ~ ~ -~ ~' ~ S.O0 /~ ~ · Discipllne .and Team ~,~ork Crltlque of Fi res pre-Plannlng.: >')nspecti°ns T'ools & AppJratu~' Identlf¥1ng · Hand Extingulsher, OPeration/ Wearing Protectlve~Clothl ng MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 D)~ I'LL Time Pumper OpcrJtlon Films First Aid and Res'cue Operatlon U~c of Self-Contalned Masks Time Fire Strea,ns r. Frlctlon Loss tlouse Burni ng;~' Natural (; Pr'opn~e (;,ns Talk ........ I; Dcrnonstr~tlons Ladder Evolution.~ ' -- .... Salvage Operations' Radio Operations tlouse Evolutlon-~ ~/J- ~ ~e. Nozzle & llose Al 1 in,,ce Inhalator Operation HouYs Training Pald ~ Excused X Unexcused 0__ p, esent, ttot Pald "~//,,~. J Andersen ~, ~:l~'i .An-de rs 0 n D~/~-- J Babb ~,Vj__ j Beauchamp ~ ~/~.- D Boyd ~'/~1- D Bryce ~'/~,S Bryce D Carl son /J-'S Collins -~-T?~M David - ~ C Erickson · ~]~. S Er'ickson ~l/~l.. a Glarvais ' ~l/~l-M Palm ~9~"L Heitz ..... "':~!~ 6 Pederson ~/;)__C Henderson ~l/J_ D Platzer ~V;~-'G Johnson. ~Vj._T Rasmussen ~LY/~. M Kleeberger ~/~ M Savage ~t/J..B Landsman ~/~. R Stallman ~t/;_ R Marschke · 'C)~/~ T Stallman ~/j-J Nafus ,~/j_ T Swenson, ill~J_ M Nelson ~;;L_.W Swenson "'J.'/j_ A Opitz ~ M Tobey ~.t/~ B Palm '~)/j.._ R Will lams ~ mG P aTM ~ )/~ ~T Williams . MOUND, MINNESOTA,\55364 D R ! L L R E P O R T Date Disclpline and .Tegm ~/o r k T[me Pumper Oper,'; t i on 'c Cr ~ t i que of F' res P re-P 1 ann ing .'t,' Inspect ions Tools & Apparatus .identifying Hand Extinguisher Operat)o~, Wearing Protective Clothing Films Fire Streams & Friction Loss tlouse Burnlng~ Natural l; Prop.~.e Gas & Dernor~s ira t i ¢,ns Ladder Evolution.~ Salvage Op.era ti o.s Radio Operations Talk First .A.id and Res'cue Operation U~c of Self-Contained Hask.~ Inhalator Operation NOTE: Hou'Fs Training Paid ~ Excused- X House EvolutTons Nozzle I; llose A1 1 i.',,ce Unexcus~.d 0 P;cse.t, Uot Pa;d Babb Be.auc.hamp Boyd Bryce Bryce Carlson Collins David Erickson Erickson GmB rva i s · Hei tz Henderson Johnson Kleeberger La6dsman Marschke Nafu s Nelson Opit-z Palm Palm Palm Pederson T_ Rasmussen,' Savage Stal 1 man Stallman Swenson Swenson Tobey Williams Williams ~-~ ~ MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT · -'. MEN ON DUTY 3 -. - J. Andersen ~/ G. A~derson J. Babb J. Beauchamp Z D. Boyd ~ .D. Bryce O S. Bryce ~ D. Carlson ~ //~ S. ~Ccllins M. David B. Erickson S. Erickson J. Garvats L. Heitz C. Henderson G. Johnson ~ M. Kleeberger ~ ~.. B"/'~Landsman R. ~ar~chke J. Nafus TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS / M. Nelson A. Opitz B. Palm G. Palm M. Palm G. Pederson D. Platzer T. Rasmussen M. Savage .- T. Stallman T. Swenson W. Swenson M. Tobey R. Williams T. Williams 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 10, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR:~''LIJ MARCH 1987 FINANCE REPORT AUDIT The annual audit of the city's financial statements took place the end of March. I prepared all of the statements and notes to the financial statements. The auditors had some minor adjustments they made to the statements. The audit will be presented to the Council at the April 28th meeting. COMPUTER The stand alone computer system was approved by the Council on March 10. The computer hardware was ordered on March 11, with an expected delivery date the end of April. The first step in preparation for the computer installation is getting the building equipped to meet the computer's electrical requirements. Also, cable must be installed to the various terminal locations within city hall. Upon completion of electrical and cabling requirements, we will be ready for the arrival of the computer hardware. March 1987 Finance Report April 10, 1987 Page 2 INVESTMENTS The followin9 is March investment activity: Balance 3-1-87 Bought.: CD 6.1 Due 4-30-87 St. Bank of Mound CD 6.1' Due 6-10-87 Marquette CP 6.1 Due 4- 7-87 Piper CP 6.16 Due 5-22-87 Dain CP 6.11 Due 6-18-87 Dain CP 6.45 Due 4-24-87 Piper $7,520,030 180,000 420,000 73,687 313,588 243,227 179,230 Matured: CP 5.5 Daln (349,892) BA 5.5 American (194,561) CD 5.95 Marquette (110,000) CP 5.75 Dain (180,610) Repo 6.2 Marquette (200,000) CP 6.4 Piper (210,000). Fed. Home 11.05 Kidder (500,000) Repo 6.0 Marquette (280,000) CP 5.73 Marquette (119,768) CD 7.75 St. Bank of Mound (250,000) Balance: 3-31-87 $6,534,831 STAFFING Lois Sandqulst had surgery and missed three and one-half weeks of work during March. This made it a busy month for the staff filling in on utility billing duties, in addition to their regular responsibilities. Gayle and Dee did a good job in answering water bill questions from residents and keeping the utility billing system operating. Joyce Nelson helped get the March commerical bills out. I am happy to report that Lois is feeling better and back to work with us. JN:ls 7701 COUNTY ROAD 110 W · MINNETRISTA, MINNESOTA 55364 · 446-1660 April 5, 1987 Mr. Edward J. Shukle,' Jr. City Manager' City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55564 Dear Mr. Shukle: Thank you for your letter of March 31, 1987. Minnetrista City Council appreCiateSthesupport that the Mound City Council has granted regarding a smaller regional park facility.in Minnetrista that can be combined with Carver Regional Park. Our City Council.supports 'a park of up to 126 acres which would allow one lake access on the 'upper lake and would also provide for the 'straightening of County Road 44. The City Council also appreciateS'that Mr. Reese will be testifying at the Metropolitan Council meeting o£ April 9. Please convey our thanks to your City Council for their s~nport, if you have 'any questions or comments, please call our office. Sincerely, Wally Clevenger Mayor WC:gmo 183 Uttiversity Ave. E., St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 (612) 227-5600 April 3, 1987 ~ TO: FROM: RE: City Clerks Helen Schendel, Associate Director Election Bill Would Supercede All City Charter~ On April 2, Senator Luther introduced legislation that would establish a "locai'government~electi°n day!' for,elections of'all': county, city,.and school district officers, County and municipal. judges, and officers of all other political subdivisions, except townships. The bill would set the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November in each odd-numbered year as the local government election day. The regular election of ali elective officers of every county," city and school district, or any other political subdivision would take place on the established local government election day. The proposed legislation would supercede all charter provisions and ali general and special laws to the extent inconsistent with the intent of the legislation. The first local government day would be November 6, 1993. Terms would be extended where necessary to comply with the provisions of the legislation except home rule charter cities may ext'end or reduce terms by ordinance if they adopt it before Dec. 1, 1992. However, the bill requires that terms be for an even number of years and staggered. Charter cities could extend terms of two years to terms of four years. Under the bill, local governments would hold primary elections six weeks before the election day. The bill would require all cities to have primary elections if more than two people file for an office or if more than twice the number of people to be elected file for an office. Cities of 2,500 population or less would not need to have primaries, but could if they pass an ordinance or resolution at least 16 weeks before the election day. Such a measure would be effective for all following elections unless the city revoked it. Filings for ali offices to be filled on local government election day would begin 14 weeks before and conclude 12 weeks before the primary or begin eight weeks before and conclude six weeks before the election day if there is no primary. The bill would require school district elections to be held.in conjunctio~ with city and county elections. It.would also require'the city to consult with the boards of each school district and each municipality which includes territory of school districts wholly or partially in the city before taking final' action on designating precinct boundaries. All terms of office for those offices elected at the local government election day would begin on the first Monday in January following their election. Even though the uniform election day would begin in 1993, many of the sections of the bill would take effect August 1~ 1~87~ THE SENATE ELECTIONS AND ETHICS COmmITTEE WILL HEAR THIS BILL ON WED., APRIL 8 AT 11:30 A.M. IN ROOM 107 OF THE CAPITOL. WE ENCOURAGE CITY OFFICIALS TO BE PRESENT. IF YOU CAN'T ATTEND, PLEASE CALL YOUR SENATOR NOW AND EXPRESS YOUR CONCERN AND OPPOSITION TO S.F..13~1. LEAGUE POLICY OPPOSES MANDATORY. PRIMARIES, SUP~RCEDING HOidE RULE CHARTERS, AND MANDATING ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR THE CONDUCT OF EdECTiONS. LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 March 30, 1987 Ms. Grace Brunner Ms. Eugenia Petersen 1642 Heron Lane Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ms. Brunner: Sank you for your ge~er'ous 'd0~a~i~n'of $50 to ~h~'~nd Police Department. The money will be used toward the recent purchase of bullet-proof vests for our officers. Sank you for your concern'for the-safety of our officers and your suport of the Mound Police Department. ~_~hei~~f.. ~ POLICE D~AR~ LH/sh Mound City Days 'April 10, 1987 Dear Friends': / This is your Mound City Days Chairperson, Harold Meeker. We will be having our next Mound City Days meeting.on Wednesday, April 22nd, at 7:30 PM, in the Mound City Hall Coun6il Chambers. We have the buttons, banners, signs and the brochure of Mound's 75-year history. But we need your hplp yet. Since Mound City Days belongs to the people of Mound, we would like to finish off our three-day celebration with a fireworks display Sunday evening, June 14th, at dusk. It also happens to be Flag Day. We have the per'on to set them off, our own. Council member Skip Johnson and crew. We have the location. 'We have the people. 'But we lack the monies for a decent fireworks display for the celebration of our 75 years. If you wish to help us'in this matter, send whatever.~ou can to: Mound City Days, P.O. Box 355, Mound MN'55364, or call 472-6682 or City Hall 472-1155. See you Wednesday, April 22nd,,7:30 PM. ' Thanks. Harold Meeker LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033 FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERs Robert Rascop, Chairman Shorewood JoEIlen Hurt, Vice Chairman Orono Mark Westlund, Secretary Wayzata Jon Elam, Treasurer Mound Marvin Sjorlin Tonka Bay J~n Boswinkel Minnetonka Beach Robert Tipton Brown Greenwood Walley Clevenger Uinnestrista Richard J. Garwood Deephaven Ron Kraemer Spring Park Robert K. Pillsbury Uinnetonka Robert E. SIocum Woodland Ron Spargo Victoria al H, Weisser Excelsior TO: MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES DATE: APRIL 8, 1987 Enclosed for your records is a copy of the Financial Statement of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District for 1986 and an additional copy for posting~ The 1986 Financial Statement was accepted by the Board of Directors at its regular meeting February 25, 1987. Executive Director mk Enc. 2 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1986 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1986 DISTRICT STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS, BALANCES Fund Balance Disburse- Balance 1-1-86 Receipts. ments 12-31-86 General Petty Cash Save the Lake Total $ 43,174.11 $131,945.91 $121,773,83 200.00 75,213.46 25,896.53 25,402.62 $118,587.57 $157,842.44 $147,177.45 $ 53,345.19 200.00 75,707..37 $129,252.56 Advance Payment of Dues Fee Advances Fee Deposits Metro Loan Investments' 15,000.00 7,169.00 Balance 1-1-86 Purchased Redeemed 3,334.00 48,455.00 1,600.00 7,831.00 $190,472.56 General Fund $ 90,502.21 $ 53,843.74 $ 50,038.33 $ 94,307.35 Save the Lake Fund 72,716.45 92,691.72 97,266.60 68,141.57 Donations Other Income Total Save the LMCD Communities Other Income Total General Fund TOTAL RECEIPTS - Projects Total Save the CLASSIFICATION OF RECEIPTS - 1986 Lake Fund Save the Lake Fund General Fund $20,825.00 5,071.53 (dues) $49,975.00 81,970.91 1986 CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENTS - 1986 Lake Fund Save the Lake Fund $25,402.62 $ 25,896.53 $131,945.91 $ 25,402.62 $157,842.44 (Balance Forwarded) LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT LMCD 1986 Financial Statement Page 2 CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENTS - 1986 Brought Forward: Save the Lake Fund General Fund Administration Personal Services Salaries 'Auditing Services Total Personal Services Contractual Services Telephone Postage Printing Utilities Maintenance: Office Equipment Janitorial Services Inspections Other Contractual Services Total Contractual ServiCes $61,298.94 500.00 $ 649.87 1,785.62 783.17 299.20 1,540.78 675.00 2,114.01 $ 61,798.94 $ 7,847.65 Commodities & Supplies Office Supplies Books & Periodicals General Supplies Total Commodities and Supplies $ 1,620.18 97.10 198.63 $ 1,915.91 Other Charges Office Rent Insurance & Bonds ..Memberships Employer Contributions Mileage & Expenses Total Other Charges Capital Outlay Office Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment Total Capital Outlay $ 3,600.00 1,468.00 245.00 9,668.60 981.53 $ 4,278.14 $ 15,983.13 $ 4,278.14 Legal Legal Services Prosecutions Total Legal Committees & Contingency Water Structures & Environment Lake Use Executive Public Information & Program Total Committees & Contingency $14,222.86 13~D89.45 $ 96.61 1,315.20 426.94 $ 28,112.31 $ 1,838.75 Total General Fund TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS- 1986 (continued) $ 25,492.62 $121,774.83 $147,]77.45 pr.tl 1 1, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICE, INC., LOCAL 35 - LEL~ POLICE SUPKRVISOPJSERCEINT$ WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year Union Contract with the Police Supervisor/Sergeants; and WHEREAS, said contract would be effective January 1,. 1987 through December 31, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement with the Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc., Local 35 (Police Supervisor/Sergeants) to be effective January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. Copy of same on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk April 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEHENT WITH THE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW -. ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320 POLICE PATROLMEN WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year Union Contract with the Police Patrolmen; and WHEREAS, said contract would be in effective January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct' the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement with the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local 320 (Police Patrolmen) to be effeCtive January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. Copy of same is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk 75 YEARS April 13, 1987 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER FROM: RE: JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY & PROSECUTING ATTORNEY EXPENSES - 1986 PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Prosecution (Paid to Attorney) Board of Prisoners (Paid to Hennepin County) $24,580 19,929 $44,509 General Fund Expense CITY ATTORNEY Retainer $1,550/mo. Allied Painting Codification (one time cost) Misc. over retainer $18,600 1,203 15,0O0 5,159 $39,962 General Fund Expense Bills Paid by Escrow Agreements, Other Departments or Funds (The following were not paid out of the General Fund except for Contel) Escrow Agreements Langdon View $ 227 Chapman Place 333 Sinclair Court 603 Richard Anderson 925 Seton Townhouses 25 Cooks Bay Estates 500 Ess 275 Other Departments or Funds $ 2,888 Lynwood Blvd. $ 4,903 Contel 4,946 Dove Lane 738 Roof Case 669 Skinner Case 375 Bartlett Blvd. 75 Beachwood Pond 65 79 Streets 51 Tuxedo Blvd. 50 $11,872 LAW OIrltlCr s WURST, PEARSON, HAMILTON, I.ARSON '~' UNDERWOOD IIOO FIRST BANK PLACE: WEST MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5540~ September 19, 1985 Mr. Steven C. Smith 2710 Clare Lane Mound, MN 55364 Re: Legal Expenses Dear ¥~. Smith: In 1966 I was retained by the Mound City Council to.be the City Attorney. I was paid a retainer of $500 per month, plus I billed for extra services outside the retainer agreement. ~he retainer was to cover regular Council meetings, staff questions, residents questions and matters general in nature, such as prep- aration of routine ordinances and opinions In 1981 my retainer was $1400 per month; it has not changed in the last four years. The CPI from 1967 to date is at roughly 310 so therefore a retainer in today's dollars, which would be the same as 1967, would be $1550 - that means that professionally I am being paid less now by the City of Mound than I was when I started. My office bills for work outside the retainer at rates from $50 to $85 per hour. Mr. Larson was appointed as the City Prosecutor and he oper- ates that function separately from my role as City Attorney. For over 20 years the civil and criminal affairs were handled by separate offices. I am including a Iist of answers from him for all the criminal matters and that would appear to answer most of your questions. It is impossible to answer your question concerning Contel condemnation because no one can project what activities or time will be required, to a large extent that depends on the policy decisions of the City Council. We cannot project who is going to sue the City. Greg Skinner ha~ now started a lawsuit in Federal Court; might other employees also sue the City. How many Wagemans and others will decide the City has done something illegal. I believe you can understand why it is necessary for a general retainer and for other work to be covered based on time spent on -47- WURST, PEARSON, HAMILTON, LAR$ON & UNDERWOOD Mr. Steven C. Smith Septembe= 19,1985 Page Two the various cases. I hope this answers the questions raised by your letter of September 6, 1985. Very truly yours, Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney CA~/ej Enclosure cc: Fran Clark, Acting City Manager -48- - C'ITY OF MOUND - Prosecution Matters Number of criminal cases initiated by complaint in 1984 ...... . Number of criminal cases initiated by complaint projected, for 1985 .., . . . . , . . . . . . ....,...... , .. Number of hours in Court on first appearances, motions, eta .... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) Number of hours in Court on trials .................. (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) Total number of hours in Court ..................... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) 128 23O 120.25 hrs. 155.50 hrs,. 275.75 hrs. Types of cases handled: DWI, BAC Over .10, DAR, DAS, DAC, Speed, Careless Driving, Disorderly Conduct, Simple Assault, Zoning Code Violations, Animal license and control matters, Misc. Number of Misdemeanor eases initiated by complaint ........ (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) Number of Gross Misdemeanor cases initiated by complaint .... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) 159 Monthly Retainer ............................. Hourly rate charged ........................... Number of hours billed for prosecution matters . . . , ....... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) ' Non-legal expenses or reimbursements collected ........... (Xerox copy expense, postage, sheriff fees) Do Not Bill For: Travel or Seeretarial/Paralegal Time None $ 60 421.25 hrs. 902.45 Number of cases handled which were set on for Couri TriaLs .... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) Number of eases handled which were set on for Jury Trials ..... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) Number of cases tried to the Jury (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) Number of cases on appeal ........................ 46 8O 3 1 ! ~ould propose to provide +.bo ~ollov~ug regular or "routine" legal mervicea for the village under ~ monthly retainer a~ree~ent ~nd will hill th~ village ~or certain special legal services not covered by the ret~iner, In genersl, the retniner aEr~e~ent would co~pensste for those legal services which are of a Inirly constant, pr~dict~ble and recurring n~ture. Extra billings will be ~nde for legsl services vhic..h ~re Dot routine in nature, which may wary consider~bl~ fro~ ~onth to ~onth or fro= yeur to ~ear, ~nd which ~re, therefore, dtf- iicult to include i~ s retainer because of their u~predictable mature · Under the retainer, I ~uld expect to provide the followtn~: 1. ittent reEular council ~etin~s and special council ~eetin~s at which my attendance is requested. _ ~ovl~ leal advice on willie aat~ra to i~ ~untcipal Judge, etc.) Provide such legal sdvice includinC any pecess~ry leiIsl r~search ~nd the draItin~ o! letters or other ~e~orsud) where needed, f~. Drnft ~ll ney council ordir~nces snd non-routine resolutions when requested. *~or~" resolutions would be prepared !or use on such =atters ~s public t~vroye=ents. 4. Draft ~nd ap~o~ t~ ex~ution of village contrects s~ of which ye will ~~ to standard fo~. 5. ~vl~ all contract ~rfor=~e bon~ =s to fo~ _ 6. ~ns~er inquiries fro~ the public on villaEe mstters. These lnquirie= often nre by telephone and =ay ori~in~te ;ith residents of the village or with_ attorneys or other pnrties havir~ business either ;ith the =unicipal court or with tho council- pdmintstrative end of village opera~tons. Under the category o! ~dditio~l legal services not '1 covered try the retainer are ~uch oer'v~coa ns the following: 1. prep=rntton for and nppe~rnnces in District Court, the Supreme Court, and before other non-village 5. ~ork involvin~ the purch~e, condmnn~tion or other scqutsitio~ of 1-~nd or. e~seme~ts. ~ork ~nvolv~ng the ftn~ncim6 of vlll~e ~rove- 4. ments such as the. dr~ttn~ of ~l~ial re~olut~ons or contracts, assembling and r~viewtu~ bond tr~nscrXpts, obtainin~ or providing ~n npprovi~ bond opinion, etc. 5. Ordinsnce codification. I ~lieve that ~e fore~o~ it~ of le~l --~ c~ise ~ c~~lve ltBti~ of ~e $~ of work ~t fr~uently e~c~~d, in~ catego~ ~ t~ ot~r. There ~y ~ ite~ of v~k which I have ~erl~,~d or which I h~ve not ~tici~ted f~ the fu~. ~h 1~ ~ld ~'cove~d by t~ ~t~iner, u~s othe~[2e ~~ ~~n t~ cou~il and myself. I will ntt~pt to call to the c~ncil*s At~ntion ~ s~l c~es or s~c[al ty~s of work not ~entioned ~ve, ~d f~ which extr~ collation ~td ~ cl~i~d. ~r statements voul~ also t~lu~ cl~ f~ ~b~- ~nt of ~t-of-~het e~~ inched by ~e or ~ f~ on behAl$ of the villege.