1987-10-27CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.fl.~ TUESD.A_~Y~ OCTOBER
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
27.~._1987
Pledge of Allegiance
Approve the Minutes of the October 13, 1987, Regular
Meeting
PUBLIC HEARING: Delinquent Utility Bills
Pg. 2896-2902
Pg. 2903
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING: To Consider an
'~-~p-T~T~'-T~r a n "0 n - S a 1 e"
Intoxicating Liquor License
for Joel Turunen, Star..Hospitalit~, Inc.,
dba Tonka Star, at 5241 Shoreline Blvd·
(formerly Captain Billy's)
(Additional material' to be handed out at meeting)
Pg. 2904-2905
PUBLIC HEARING:
Proposed Vacation of Portion of Phelps
Road on the East Side of Tuxedo Blvd.
Abutting.Lots 13 & 14, Block 20,
Whipple (3314 Tuxedo Blvd.) P & Z
Case #87-666
Pg. 2906-2912
Request by Ms. Sandra Konnad, 4458 Denbigh Rd. to
address the Council regarding P & Z Case #87-673,
Mr. Jack Cook, 4458 Denb.igh Roa.d. Variance was
approved at the October 13, 1987, meeting
Discussion on Item #7 in Resolution #87-145, Amendment
to Balboa Mn. Corp. Conditional Use Permit
Pg. 2913-2927
Pg. 2928-2932
Request for Issuance .of a Building Permit for 2867
Westedge Blvd. (Lot 11, Block 2, Westwood) by
Mr. Richard M. Smith, 6600 Mohawk Trail, Edina Pg. 2933-2937
Request for Extension of Resolution #86-100, "Resolution
to Approve a Final Plat of Seton Place, PID #24-117-24
14 0027/0038/0039/0013, Lots 7, 8, & 9, Block 29, and
Part of Lot 6, Block 18, Seton, P & Z Case #86-507 and
508, Including the City Engineer's Recommendations on
the Storm Sewer & Drainage Ditch" Pg. 2938-2944
Page 2893
10.
Request for Extension of Resolution #87-181, "Resolution
to Concur with the Planning Commission to Grant a
Variance to Temporarily Place a Travel Trailer at
6260 Deerwood Drive, Lot 4, Block 3, Woodcrest .
P & Z Case #87-668" Pg. 2945-2947
CASE #87-670:
Don &.jan Larson, 4619 Carlow .Road,
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and East 10 feet of
6, and the adjacent part of street
vacated along the same; Block 24, Seton;
(PID #19-117-23 24 0044/0045)
12.
Request:
CASE 187-671:
Request:
Front Yard Setback Variance
Pg. 2948-2956
Earl & Nila Erlander, 4354 Wilshire Blvd.,
Lot 80, Phelps Island Park First Division,
also land lying between sa~.d. Lot.80 and the
shore of Block Lake, PID #19-117-23 13 0013
Lakeshore Setback Variance Pg. 2957-2967
Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present.
14.
Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to
Notify James A. Riley that the City will Exercise its
Option to Purchase Land
Pg. 2968
15.
Reappointment of Pinky Charon to the Mound Housing and
Redevelopment Authority Pg. 2969-2970
16. Developer's Presentation of Country Inn Project at
Lost Lake
17. Payment of Bills,
18. INFORHATION/HISCELLANEOUS
Pg. 2971-2972
Pg. 2973-2987
A. September Financial Report as Prepared by Finance
~Director, John Norman
B. Planning Commission Minutes of October 12, 1987
Pg. 2988-2989
Pg. 2990-2993
Article from St. Paul Pioneer Press (Business/
Twin Cities) Regarding Hotels
Pg. 2994-2997
Notice of League Policy Adoption Meeting for
1988 Proposed Legislative Policies and
Priorities. If you would like a copy of these,
please let Fran know.
Page 2894
Date:
Time:
Place:
Wednesday, November 18, 1987
9:00 A.M.
Sheraton Midway Hotel in St. Paul
REflINDER: Special Council Work Session
Saturday, October 31, 1987
7:30 A.M.
Lafayette Club
Please turn your goals and objectives in to
Fran or bring them to the Saturday Meeting
Pg. 2998
Page 2895
... 165.
October 13, 1987
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUMCIL - OCTOBER 13, 1987
The City. Council of Mound,. Hennepin. County, Minnesota, met in regular session
on Tuesday, October 13, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341
Maywood Road, in.said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel., Liz Jensen,
and Skip. Johnson. Councilmember Phyllis Jessen arrived at 7:50 P.M. Also
present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City
Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, Building Official Jan
Bertrand, Police Chief Len Harrell, and the following interested citizens:
Joseph Safreed, Nancy & Darrell Barclay, Dan & Liz Tveite, Ken Kelsey, Jim
Beletti, Wade Neske, Chris Heeb, Joel Turunen, Bill McNamee, Jim McNamee, Teri
Vitah, Don Maxwell, Tom Maxwell, Steve Coddon, Jack Cook, Paula Gronland, Bret
Haage, Norman Berglund, Clarence & Carol Krotzer, Susan Dailey, Charles
McCain.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance Was recited.
MIMUTES
MOTION made by. Abel, seconded by Jensen to approve the minutes of the
September 22, 1987, Regular Meeting, and the September 30, 1987, Special
Meeting, as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR AN "ON'SALE" INTOXICATING LIQ~
UOR .LICENSE FOR JOEL..TURUNEN, · STAR HOSPITALITY, INC.~ DBA
TONKA STARt· AT 5241 SHORELINE. BLVD, (FORMERLY CAPTAIN
BILLY'S),
The City Manager stated that the Police Chief is not recommending approval of
this license at this time. The Police Chief stated that the investigation
done has uncovered that there are more principals involved and additional
funds involved that were not disclosed in the original application. The addi-
tional principals are Bill McNamee, Mark Saliterman and Bill Alexander. He
also stated that Mr. Turunen has not provided financial information and infor-
mation regarding his investment in the business. Mr. Joel Turunen and Mr.
Bill McNamee were present to answer questions from the Council.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one responded. The Mayor closed the
public hearing.
There was discussion on the Tonka Star's status with the Health Dept. and the
delinquent water and sewer bill owed to the City of Mound.
166 ....
October 13, 1987
HOTION made by Smith to approve the 'On'Sale' Intoxicating Liquor
License for North Star Hospitality, dba Tonka Star. Notion died for
lack of a second.
The council further questioned Hr. Turunen's involvement in the business. Hr.
Turunen stated that according to his agreement with Hr. Alexander the defined
amount that he will pay Hr. Alexander for the business is $125,000 and this·
would be paid on a best .effort basis. He further stated that he has paid
nothing down, has no investment and no actual payment schedule for the busi-
ness. Hr. Turunen stated he would supply the necessary financial information
and other information that has been requested.
Hr. HcNamee stated that he will be managing the establishment and would be in:
vesting in the business. He further stated that he will fill out the neces-
sary papers to have an investigation started on him.
The Council discussed delaying this item for 2 weeks.
NOTION made by Jensen,.seconded by Abel to continue this public hearing
until the October 27, 1987, meeting so that additional information'can
be submitted and investigated. The vote was unanimously in favor. Ho-
tion carried~ '
CASE #87-672: DARRELL & NANCY BARCLAY~ OWNERS AND DANIEL &*ELIZABETH TVEITE~
APPLICANT,..2666 .WESTEDGE BLVD.~.._LOTS .2~.:3, AND 4~ BLOCK1,
BATDORF'S 1ST ADDITION-(PID #23-117-24 24 0014/0059)~ .NINO~
SUBDIVISION
The Building Official explained the. request. The Planning Commission recom,
mended approval if the fee owners, {Clarence & Carol Krotzer}, signed the ap-
plication. They signed the application this evening. Hr. & Hrs. Krotzer were
present and asked that the subdivision not be recorded until he can give a
deed to the Barclays.
Councilmember jensen stated that there was a purchase agreement from the
Barclay's to a Paula Gronland that has now expired.but Hs. Gronland was at the
Planning Commission meeting objecting to the request. Hs. Gronland and Hr.
Bret Haage were present at this meeting objecting to the subdivision.
The City Attorney stated that he has no objection to the proposed subdivision,
but advised that an additional condition be added to the resolution as
follows: "The resolution approving the subdivision shall be delivered to the
fee owners, Clarence & Carol Krotzer, for recording upon compliance with the
conditions contained in this resolution." The Council agreed to add this
stipulation.
Abel moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
.... 167
October 13, 1987
RESOLUTION #87-188
RESOLUTION TO.AR. PROVE A HINOR SUBDIVISION FOR LOTS
Z,.3,_4, BLOCK.l, BATI)ORF'S FIRST ADDITION PID t23-
117-Z4.Z4 0014/0059 {Z666 WESTEDGE BLVD,) P & Z
CASE #87-672
The vote was 4 in favor with Councilmember Jensen voting nay. Motion carried.
CASE t87-641: NORNAN. BERGLUND~ 1905 CONCORDIA ST.~.WAYZATA~-HN.~.LOTS 11.THRU
20 &.27 THRU 36~-BLOCK 11~.~SETON (PID.#lg-llT-Z3 21-003Z) -
DIVISION OF TAX PARCELINI'O 5 LOTS
The Building Official explained the request. The City Engineer explained that
there is no sewer service to one of the parcels and no water service to
another. There are also deficient unit charges .for street, sewer and water.
He asked the City Attorney if this should be noted in the resolution. The
City Attorney stated it could be in the resolution, but should definitely be
noted on the property cards. The Attorney stated that these .items are dealt
with in the City Code under Sections 600:50 for sewer and 610:15 for water.
Abel moved and Jensen sec'pnded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #87-189 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE DIVISION' OE_TAX PARCEL INTO
THE ORIGINAL PLAI-I'EO LOTS, LOTS ll_TIIRU_20 AND 27
THRU 36, BLOCK 11, SETON, PID #19-117-23 Z1003Z
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE 187-669: JOHN. & HELVIN-BOSHA~..170 COUNTY.ROAD.II0 .NORTH~-LOTS 17 & 18~
BLOCK .5~ .PEHBROKE~-.(PID t19-117-23 .33.0010)~ .-VARIANCE IN.LOT
AREA
The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission has
recommended approval. She asked that the following be added to the proposed
resolution~ "5. Upon further condition that a soil test be submitted prior
to parcel development." The Council agreed.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION /87-190 RESOLUTION TO- APPROVE A VARIANCE IN LOT..AREA* FOR
LOTS 17 AND. 18, BLOCK 5, PENBROKE, PID /19-117-23
33 0010, (3100 XNVERIIESS LAgE)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
168
October 13, 1987
cAsE t87-673: JACK COOK~ 4452 DENBIGH ROAD,..-LO~_2.-.INCLUDING.ADJACENT.VACATED
STREET~. BLOCK 1~ AVALON .(PID ./19-117-23 24 0002~ SIDE.YARD SET-
BACK-VARIANCE
The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recom-
mended approval.
Jensen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #87-191
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOHNENDATION TO APPROVE k VARIANCE FOR k NONCON?
FORNING STRUCTU~ ON.LOT 2 INCLUDING..JUMACENT. VA~
CATED STREET, BLOCK 1, AVALON, PID ~19.112-23 24
0002, (4452 DENBIGH ROAD)· P & Z CASE #87-$73
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE #87-667: THOMAS NAXWELL~ 3114 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE~ LOT 59~ PHELP'SISLAND
PARK FIRST *ADDZTION~-VARZANCE *.TO RECOGNIZE AN.EXISTING.NONCON-
FORMING SIDE YARD-SETBACK
The Building' Official explained that this item was' continued from the last
meeting so the applicant could remove the encroachmeht on the adjoining
property or have the survey redone. The applicant was present and delivered a
new survey which showed no encroachment.
Abel moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #87-192 RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE All EXISTING NONCONFORMING
STRUCTURE TO ALLOW AN ADDITION FOR. LOI...59, PHELP'S
ISLAND PARK FIRST ADDITION, PID #19-117=23-34 0082
(3114 ISLAND VIEW.DRIVE), P & Z CASE ~87-667
The vote was Unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CONHENTS & SUGGESTIONS FRON CITIZENS PRESENT
There were n6 comments Or suggestions from the citizens present.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE HAYOR AND CITY HANAGER TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIN DEED
(LOT 5~ BLOCK 12~SETON).
The City Attorney explained that this is to resolve any questions of ownership
and the easements on Lot 5, Block 12, Seton.
Johnson moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 187-193
...... 169
October 1~, 1987
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING. THE NAYOR AND .CITY HANAGER
TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIH DEED (LOT 5, BLOCK 12,
SETON)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION AHENDING CDBG JOINT COOPERATION AGREEHENT ~!70484
The City.. Manager explained this amendment is needed because of additional
requirements issued by HUD.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:'
RESOLUTION #87-194 RESOLUTION..A~ENDING CDBG JOINT COOPERATIOH AGREE-
RENT #70484
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE AHENDING LANGUAGE IN SECTION 437:25 .OF THE CITY CODE
The City Clerk explained'that the last 2 sentences in this section currently
read as follows: "Resid6nts of the City of Mound 65 years of age or older
shall pay 50% of the required license fee for a straight dock. A full license
fee shall be charged to all persons for all L, T, or U docks and boathouses."
When the recodification was done fees are all listed in section 510 of the
City Code and the Council changes these by resolution so the last 2 sentences
currently in the Code should be deleted and replaced with the following: "The
annual license fee for residents of the City. of Mound 65 years of age or older
shall be as set by the Council in Section 510:00."
Abel moved and Jensen seconded the following:
ORDINANCE #9-87 AN ORDINANCE AI~NDING SECTION 437:25 OF THE CITY
CODE RELATING TO DOCK LICENSE FEE
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
LICENSE AppROVALS
The following licenses were submitted for approval.
a. On-Sale Wine & Beer, Restaurant for D'Vinci's
2244-A Commerce Blvd.
b. Cigarette - VFW, 2544 Commerce Blvd.
The Building Official asked that D'Vinci's licenses be issued upon their
170 .....
October 1.3, 1987
receipt of a Certificate of Occupancy.
The Council agreed.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jessen to authorize the issued of
the folloNing licenses:
0n~Sale gine & Beer, Restaurant for D'Vinci's
2244-A Commerce Blvd. Nhen a Certificate of Occupancy is issued
by the Building 0fficial.
b. Cigarette - VFI/, 2544 Commerce Blvd.
The vote Nas unanimously ~n favor. Mo~ion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to approve .the payment of bills
as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $261,343.89, when funds
are available. A roll call vote Nas unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
~OMMONS MAI,If[ENANCE PERMIT
The City Manager explained that William and Elaine Lovk¥ist, 1745 Wildhurst
Lane would like to build a stairway on a steep bank to the Commons. They
would also install a light on their property for this stairway. The Park Com-
mission has recommended approval.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to approve a Commons Main-
tenance.Permit to William and Elaine Lovkvist for land abutting Lot 8,
Block 13, Shadyuood Point. Permit to alloN the construction of a stair-
way and installation of a light and receptacle at the top of stairuay.
All to be maintained by the property owner. The vote Nas upanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
INFORHATION/MISCELLANEOUS
Letter from Dowden Cablesystems of the possibility of the sale of all of
Dowden's properties.
Be
September Monthly Reports as Prepared by the Department Heads.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Johnson to adjourn at 9:00 P.M.
vote Nas unanimously in favor. Hotion carried.
The
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
aqo/
BILLS ..... October 13, 1987
Batch 7091 Computer run 9/28/87 108,057.39
Batch 7093 Computer run 9/30/87 31,907.15
Batch 7094 Computer run 10/8/87 120,515.23
260,479.77
SuperAmerica Gasoline
864.12
TOTAL BI LLS
261.343.89
Delinquent Water and Sewer 10-22-87
33 435 4400 51
33 q63 4735 01
33 463 4840 61
33 466 4825 01
33 472 457O O2
33 475 4515 82
33 475.4515 01
33 475 4635 62
33 484 3113 51
33 484 4821 23
33 484'4905 32
33 484 5174 51
33 487 4764 71
33 487 4873 61
33 5O6 3135 82
33 518 4684 92
33 518 4725 O2
33 '530 481.0 51
33 551' 3087 71
33 554 3033 51
33 569 4876 41
33 572 4864 41
33 587 4951 71
33 593 4866 53
33 596 4811 41
33 599 4580 54
33 599 4773 02
33 608 3~07 51
33 620 4556 32
33 620 4828 61
33 620 4884 93
33 620 4921 91
33 638 3246 41
33.641 5220 12
33 647 5211 71
$116.75
lO5.34
73.00
52.20
78.33
177.87
111.52
131.81
15o.32
167.82
76.72
103.49
100.54
118.47
89.53
129.42
115.78
77.01
131.31
99.45
100.50
84.12
101..06
131.40
76.13
71.31
76.51
114.41
113.65
125.52
225.23
90.81
147.55
57.40
114.88
$~922-76
Delinquent Water and Sewer 10-22-87
33 439 4400 91
33 463 4739 O1
33 463 4840 61
33 466 4825 O1
33 472 4570 02
33 475 4515 82
33 475 4519 01
33 475 4639 62
33 484 3113 51
33 484 4821 23
Morgan & Ward
Roberta Nelson
S. Hofshult
Peter Lund
Peter Ba]tuff
M.J.Phillipi
M.J.Phi]lipi
Ramona Reimer
Robert Wagstrom
Robert Forrest
33 484 4905 32 Joe Fiedler
33 484 5174 51 Gary Carlson
33 487 4764 71 Reynold Nelson
33 506 3135 82 T. Williams
33 518 4684 92 T. Levesque
Z"~33 518 4795 02 Mark Nadon
33 530 48t0 51
33 551 3087 71
33 5~4 3033 51
33 569 4876 41
33 572 4864 41
33 587 4951 71
James Leiter
Richard Maxwell
S. Sundquist
Gary Snyder
R. Swanson
Gary Schlief
33 593 4866 53 Willis Dressel
33 596 4811 41 Ocdupant
33 599 4580 94 Sandra Hanson
33 599 4773 02 Eeanne Miller
33 608 3207 91 Keith Johnson
33 620 4556 32 Scott Berglund
33 620 4828 61 Douglas Nelson
33 620 4884 93 Terrance.'Berg
33 620 4921 91 Joe Andrews
33 638 3246 41 Occupant
33 641 5220 12 Paul Beckford
33 647 5211 71 Duane Nelson
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd.
Pd
Pd.
Pd.
$116.75
105.34
73.00
92.20
78.33
177.87
111.92
131.81
150.32
167.82
76.72
103.49
100.54
118.47
89.53
129.42
77.ol
131.31
99.45
100.90
84.12
101.06
131.40
76.13
71.31
76.51
114.41
113.65
125.92
229.23
90.81
147.95
97.40
114.88
$ 3922:.. 76
4400 Wilshlre Blvd.
4739 Bedford Rd.
4840 Wilshire B]vd.
4825 Brunswick Rd.
4570 Dorchester Rd.
4515 Manchester Rd.
4519 Manchester Rd.
'4639 Manchester Rd.
'3113 Tuxedo Blvd.
4821 Tuxedo Blvd.
4905 Tuxedo B]vd.
'5174 Tuxedo Blvd.
4764 Cumberland Rd.
~373 C .... l~i,~,,j Rd__
3135 Ayr Ln.
4684 Hampton Rd.
~810 Donald Dr.
'3087 Alexander Ln.
3033 Dundee Ln.
4876 Leslie Rd.
4864 Monmouth Rd.
4951 Brighton Blvd.
4866 Drummond Rd.
4811 Hanover Rd.
4580 Aberdeen Rd.
4773 Aberdeen Rd.
3207 Amhurst Rd.
4556 Island View Dr.
4828 Island View Dr.
4884 Island View Dr.
4921 Island View Dr.
3246 Warner Ln.
5220 Sulfrove Rd.
52'11 Phelps Rd.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF MOUND~ MINNESOTA
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota
will meet on Tuesday, October 13, 1987, at 7:30 P. M. for the purpose of
a public hearing on an application for an "On-Sale" Intoxicating Liquor
License for Joel Turunen, Star Hospitality, Inc., dba Tonka Star, at 5241
Shoreline Boulevard (formerly Captain Billy's). At this hearing,
opportunity shall be given any person to be heard for or against the
granting of the license.
Francene C. Clark, CMC, City ClErk
Publish in The Laker September 28, 1987
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511
EMERGENCY 911
October 8, 1987
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle, City Manager
Len Harrell, Chief of Police
Star Hospitality, Inc.
Sgt. Hudson has been attempting to investigate the liquor license application
that was submitted by Joel Turunen for the business Tonka Star. The investi-
gation has been restricted by the lack of cooperation of the principals in
providing needed information. Mr. Turunen has been requested to provide
financial information and information regarding his investment of $95,000.00
in the businesses. As of this date, no documentation has been provided.
The original application, fees and pro-rated liquor license fee were paid by
Mark Saliterman and Bill Alexander. According to Mr. Alexander, Mr. Saliterman
has advanced $23,000 to Alexander to assist in re-opening the business for
which Alexander has re-negotiated his lease agreement. The $23,000 will be
repaid through higher square footage costs and has been backed by the fixtures
and equipment currently in the establishment. Mr. Alexander is to be respon-
sible for the lease with Mr. Saliterman for eight years and there is a stipu-
lation that Alexander can not sub-lease er sell the business without Saliterman's
approval.
Sgt. Hudson's investigation would indicate that the same equipment and fixtures
that Mr. Turunen is claiming as his investment is currently controlled by
Mr. Saliterman through the new lease agreement.
In further investigating, Sgt. Hudson spoke with a Mr. Ernest McNamee at the
business location. Mr. McNamee stated that he was a managing partner under the
name of Mack II, Inc. and that Turunen was only a "silent partner." McNamee
claims that he will be investing $5,000 and will be responsible for the day to
day operations of the establishment.
Hudson became aware of facts regarding health department violations that will
need to be corrected, as well as several outstanding bills with the state and
the city that also need to be satisfied before the business can re-open.
At this time I can not support approval of the liquor license for the Tonka Star.
The investigation'has uncovered that there are more principals involved and
additional funds involved that were not disclosed in the original application.
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
October 26, 1987
TO:
FROM:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DI RECTOR
RE:
TONKA STAR LIQUOR LICENSE
Each application for an on-sale liquor license is accompanied by a payment
of one-half of the license fee on a prorated basis. Tonka Star paid one-
half of the liquor license fee for the period of September 1987 - June
1988. The remaining balance of the license fee must be paid before the
license is issued. Mound City Ordinance 800.10, Subd. 7, states that the
entire annual on-sale liquor license fee must be paid for first years
operation of a newly licensed establishment. Future years license fees
maybe paid in two installments.
The following is a recap of liquor license fee owed by Tonka Star:
LIQUOR LICENSE OWED
LIQUOR SUNDAY TOTAL
LIQUOR
Period Nov. 1987 - June 1988
One-half payment received by City 8-20-87
period Sept. 87 - June 88
$2666.72 133.36 $2800.08
($1800.65) ($83.35) ($1884.OO)
Balance of Liquor License owed
if November opening
*If business were to open October 28, 1987,
additional balance owed would be
$866.O7 $50.01 $916.O8
$334.34 $16.67 $351.O1
Total of liquor license owed if
October opening
$~2OO.41 $66.68 $1267.O9
Tonka Star has paid in full the restaurant, entertainment, dancing, cigarette,
pool and games of skill fees.
Memo to Ed Shukle
October 26, 1987
Page 2
In conclusion, Tonka Star has the following financial obligations with
the City of Mound:
October November
I' Opening Opening
Balance due on liquor licenses
$1267.09 $916.08
Balance due on Utility bill
$779.66 $779.66
$2046.75 $1695.74
*Mound City Code Section 800:15, Subd. 3, states if application made
during license year, a license may be issued for the remainder of .the
year for a pro rate fee, with any unexpired fraction of a month being
counted as one month.
JN:ls
MOUND'
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
October 9, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR
UNPAID UTILITY BILL ON CAPTAIN BILLY'S PROPERTY
I have photocopied the current water and sewer bill outstanding
on the Captain Billy's property. The total owed is $779.66,
this amount must be paid in full.
The Mound City Code states
that no liquor license shall be granted on premises on which
financial claims of the City are delinquent and unpaid.
JN:Is
FOR:
UTILITY BILL
5241 Shoreline Blvd.
42 404 5241 91
754.21
8.14
16.82
.49
METER :READING
9059 I 90671
A G E
8000
779 66 782.20
THIS AMOUNT DUE
FROM:
City of Mound
5341Maywood Rd.
Mound,MN 55364
To:{
Captain Billys
5241 Shoreline Blvd.
Mound,MN 55364
42 .~0~ ~;241 ~,1 110/28/871
, 779,661 {
KEEP THIS STUB FOR YOUR RECOROS RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT
Mound City Code
Section 800:30, Subd. 2
Subd. 2. Time in Business. No license shall be issued to any business until
it has been in operation continuously for six months.
claSUbd. 3. Delinquent Taxes and Cbar~es. No license shall be granted fo~
operation on any premises on which taxes, assessments, or other financial~
tms of the City are delinquent and unpaid. .
Section 800:35. Conditions of License.
Subd. 1. In General. Every license is subject to the conditions in the
following subdivisions and all other provisions of this Section and of any
other applicable ordinance, state law, or regulation.
Subd. 2. Chanses in Corporate Form - Notification Requirements. Changes in
the-corporate or association officers, corporate charter, articles of
incorporation, by-laws, or partnership agreement, as the cases may be,
shall be submitted to the City Clerk within 30 days after such changes are
made. In the case of a corporation, the licensee ~hall notify the City
Clerk when a person not listed in the application acquires an interest which,
together with that of his or her. spouse, parent,;brdtber, sister, or child,
exceeds $~, and shall give all information about said person as is required
of a person pursuant to the provisions of Section 800:10, Subd." 2.
Subd. 3. Chantes in Corporate Form - Early Termination of License.
..Any change of ownership or beneficial interest or sales of stock entitled
to be voted at any meeting of the stockholders of a corporation which result
in,a change in voting control of the corporation by the persons owning shares..
of stock therein shall be deemed equivalent to a transfer of the license
issued to such corporation, and any such license shall be revoked and
terminated 30 days after any such change in ownership or beneficial interest
of shares, unless the Council shall have been notified of such change in
writing and shall have approved thereof.
Subd. 4. Chan~es in Physical Condition of Licensed Premises - Notification
Requirements. Proposed enlargement, alteration, or extension of premises
previously licensed Shall be reported to the City Clerk at or before the time
application is made for a building permit for any such change, and the
licensee shall also give such information as is required by Section 800:10,
Subd. 2. ..
Subd. 5. Licensee's Responsibility. Every licensee is responsible for
the conduct of his or her place of business and the conditions of sobriety
and order in it. The act of any employee on the licensed premises authorized
to sell intoxicating liquor there is deemed the act of the licensee as
well, and the licensee shall be liable to all penalties provided by this
Section and the law equally with the employee.
Subd. 6. Inspections. Every licensee shall allow any peace officer,
health officer, or properly designated officer or employee of the City to
enter, inspect, and search the premises of the licensee during business
hours without a warrant. In addition, the business records of the licensee,
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511
EMERGENCY 911
October 26, 1987
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mound City Council
Chief Len Harrell
Star Hospitality, Joel Turunen Liquor License Application
I spoke with Ernest William McNamee on October 20, 1987, regarding his involvement
with the Tonka Star. Mr. McNamee stated that his involvement consists only of the
two months of clean-up and getting the establishment ready to open. McNamee states
that he has a 90 day contract with Mr. Turunen for 20% of the gross as his salary.
Mr. McNamee states that many of the items discussed at last Tuesday's Council
meeting were also of a surprise to him. Mr. McNamee was advised to contact Mr.
Turunen and to sit down and correct any misrepresentations that were made in the
application.
On October 21, 1987, I met with William Alexander who inquired as to what was
needed to get the process approved and stated that Mr. Turunen is new to the
business and Alexander would assist him. Mr. Alexander assured me that he wanted
nothing more to do with the liquor business. Mr. Alexander was advised of the
financial documents needed from Mr. Turunen and was advised of corrections needed
in the application. Mr. Alexander stated that he would meet with Mr. Turunen and
that necessary items would be provided.
On October 23, 1987, Mr. Alexander came to the Mound Police Department and
produced a synopsis of the business arrangement between bM. Saliterman, Mr. Turunen,
Mr. Alexander, and Mr. McNamee. Mr. Alexander also provided a resume from Mr.
Turunen with a personal financial report. Mr. Alexander also provided a letter
dated September 27, 1987, responding to Sgt. Hudson's letter dated September 23,
1987, for which the City never received a response. Mr. Alexander provided an
amendment to his lease agreement with Mr. Saliterman allowing Star Hospitality
to sublet. That document has not been signed as of yet.
I then began to comPlete the background on Mr. Turunen and found him to be a very
solvent individual who owns two properties in northern Minnesota, a home in
Minneapolis, and stock that is substantial. Mr. Turunen also receives a substan-
tial salary and commissions from his present employment.
I spoke with Mr. Turunen who stated that he had been surprised by some of the
items uncovered during the investigation and had spoken with a personal attorney
but felt that the situation could be resolved and it was his intention to run a
nice, clean, family business in Mound.
Mound City Council
October 26, 1987
Page Two
On October 26, 1987, I received a call from Mr. Turunen who stated that he had
reconsidered the business venture in Mound because of some concerns that had been
uncovered and some liabilities that may become his responsibility. Mr. Turunen
stated that he was withdrawing his application for a liquor license for the Tonka
Star. The letter from Mr. Turunen is attached.
October 23, 1987
Mr. Len Harrell
Chief of Police
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Len:
This letter is formal notification that I withdraw
from applying for a liquor license from the City
of Mound, Minnesota.
Recent developments just uncovered have made my
prusuing this license an unwise business decision
at this time.
Respectfully Submitted,
Joel Turunen
Star Hospitality, Inc.
4412 Victory Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55412
(612) 521-6250
CITY OF HOUND
Mound, Minnesot~
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF
PORTION OF' PHELPS ROAD ON THE EAST SIDE OF
TUXEDO BOULEVARD ABUTTING LOTS 13 AND 14,
BLOCK 20, WHIPPLE (3314 Tuxedo Boulevard)
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that a public hearing will be held at the
Mound' City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on the
27th day of October,, 1987 to consider the vacation of the following des-
cribed portion of street:
Phelps Road on the East side of Tuxedo Boulevard abutting Lots 13
and 14, Block 20, Whipple; PID 25-117-24 21 0072
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above w111
be heard.at thi. s meeting.
Publish in The'Laker October 5, 1987
Francene C. C~[~rk, City Clerk
RECEiVED SEP 2 8 !987
~~ McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc.
12800 Industrial Park Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55441
612/559-3700
1-800-328-8322 Ext. 784
September 25, 1987
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Ms. San Bertrand
Planning and Zoning
Cityof Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBOECT:
Proposed Street Vacation
Phelps Road, Case #87-666
HKA File #2113
Dear San:
As requested, we have reviewed the application to vacate a portion of
Phelps Road lying directly east of Tuxedo Boulevard and have the following
comments and recommendations.
As I stated at the Planning Commission Meeting on September 14, 1987, we
would have to recommend that the City not vacate this street for the following
reasons:
Direct access would be denied to two parcels, 136 and 165, which are
shown on the attached map. It is questionable whether parcel 165 is
buildable because of the wetlands; but both parcels do meet the zoning
requirements.
be
From the topography in the area, it appears this vacation would also
deny access to the south tier of lots (17 through 23) in parcel 134.
They are at a much lower elevation than the portion of parcel 134,
which abuts Waterbury Road; and if developed, may require the
extension of Phelps Road.
We have also discussed this with.the City Attorney's office, and I
believe you will find that they are of the same option that the City
should not approve the vacation.
Enclosed is a map which indicates the ownership of the parcels which would
be affected by the proposed vacation.
Very truly yours,
McCONBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
3ohn Cameron
OC:khw
Enclosure
,A, RD~
Planning Commission Hinutest
September 1/4, 1987~
Case No. 87-666 PUBLIC HEARING on proposed Vacation of portion of Phelps Road
(on East side of Tuxedo Boulevard abutting Lots 13 and 14,.Block 20, Whipple)
As the City Engineer had not arrived,.Jensen moved and Weiland seconded a
motion to table. The vote was unanlmously in favor.
When the City Engineer John Cameron arrived, Case No. 87-666 was taken off
the table.
The City Engineer reported the'problem he sees with the proposed street vaca-
tlon is that some parcels under private ownership 1ie East of this proposed
vacation. Lots 8. and 9, Block 23, Whipple.may be wetlands, but taxes are be-
ing paid on lots; Lots 15 and 16, and also Lots 17 through 23, Block 20,
Whipple, are under private owhership and appear to be buildable from aerial
photographs. The vacation of portlon of Phelps Road would cut off access and
there is not another access because of topography. He commented another item
was that if Phelps.Road were vacated, all that applicant would galn would be
'the north half; the other half would go with Lot 10, Block 23.
Hrs. 0'1son stated that Lot 10, Block 23, was tax fOrfeit and would be up for
auction this winter to adjacent 'homeowners. She stated if vacation went thru,
they would be an adjacent owner.
The Commission discussed the request and noted that applicant's driveway is
on the unimproved Phelps Road~
The Vice Chairman opened the public hearing. Hr. 01son presented a drawing
of hls driveway and the structures on his lot. His concern is that if the
City were to put a road in, it would be at the same level as Tuxedo and than
he could have a water problem because hls property is lower than Tuxedo; he
wants the street vacated to protect hTs property and to be able to control
the drainage. The Clty Engineer advised that, .if the road were to be put in,
the City would take drainage into consideration.
No others wished to speak for or against the vacatlon. The publlc hearing
was closed.
Jensen moved and Weiland seconded a motion for denial of the proposed
vacation. Reason is that we can't vacate roads when there are lots on
the other slde. The vote was unanlmously in favor.
The Council will set a date for the public hearing on their meeting Sept. 22.
~. 3/84
· i.'i ~/~.~.~-~,7__~,0~.! APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CASE NO.
['~ AU~ 2 ~ {~ ~ CITY OF MOUND FEE $150.OO
LESAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY O~NE~ BY APPLI~ANT~ PI~ ~ ~ II 3~ ~1 O0
REASON FOR REQUEST
Applicant's Interest in Property
Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated:
(Please attach~list~ Certified mailing listscan be obtained from
Hennepin County by calling 348-3271)
Recommended by Utilities: NSP
Recommended by City: Public Works~
Minnegasco ~-7~; Continental Telephone
Fire Chief ; Engineer ;
Police
Chief ~ ; Cable Systems ; Other Departments
' ~ '~_.Planning~-Commission Recommendation.'~ Denial of the request because proposed vacation
would cut off access to lots that appear to be buildab)e to the east. The vote on the
denial was unanimous,
Date September 14~ 1987.
Council Action
Resolution No.
Date
RD
~ WA.T'ERBURY
PHELP~
RD
,tBt
4 \
BERNICK AND STERN
A F~ROF'Ir~,~IONAL A~,~,OCIATION
A'I-FORNEY~ AT I-AW
STERN, LEVINE, LIFSON & STRAUSS, P. A.
SERNICK, SHAPIRO AND GI..~SSMAN~ P, A.
PARK. DALE I, SUITE 200
5401 GAHBIE DRIVE
ST. LOUIS PAl~lC, MINNESOTA
(612) 5.46 -1200
October 21, 1987
Mr. Jack Cook
4452 Denbigh Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re:
Encroachment onto Lot 3 and the
East 10 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon
Dear Mr. Cook:
I have been retained by Sandra J. Konnad with respect to the
enCroachments onto her property by the recent construction
originating from your property.
For your reference, I enclose a copy of a survey recently
completed, which shows the following encroachments onto Ms.
Konnad's property:
Your metal shed is located three-tenths of one
foot on Ms. Konnad's property.
The wooden retaining wall immediately south of
the shed encroaches seven-tenths of one foot on
the north end and eight-tenths of one foot on
the south end.
The wooden retaining wall to the north of the
foregoing retaining wall encroaches 1.15 feet
on the north and 3.7 feet on the south.
The wooden deck adjacent to your home
encroaches one foot on the north and
eight-tenths of one foot on the south end.
The concrete foundation of the entrance to your
basement on the west side of your house
encroaches .08 feet across its entire width.
Mr. Jack Cook
October 21, 1987
Page 2
BERNICK AND STERN
A PROFESSIONAl ASSOCIATION
It is unfortunate that these improvements were made without
securing the necessary permits. I understand a survey was obtained
by you two years ago, but the stakes were lost during the extensive
regrading of your back lot. Had you reestablished the lot line
prior to commencing construction, you could have perhaps avoided
this problem.
On behalf of Ms. Konnad, we are requesting that these
encroachments be removed immediately. I have been provided with a
copy of a Resolution by the City Counsel dated October 13, 1987,
which appears to authorize a variance from the six foot side set
back to within 3.7 feet of the side lot line on the west. At a
minimum, that side lot clearance should be reestablished adjacent
to the home. It is not clear whether the retaining walls to the-
north and the metal shed are subject to the variance or must be
reestablished at a minimum of six feet to the east of the property
line.
It is my understanding that your request for a variance was
placed upon the Planning Commission agenda for the meeting
October 12, 1987, and further placed upon the City Counsel agenda
for approval the following day, October 13. Ms. Konnad advises me
that she spoke with you on the morning of October 13, and that you
advised her of the results of the Planning Commission meeting the
previous evening. In response to her inquiry as to the date of the
next counsel meeting, you advised her not of the meeting scheduled
for that evening, but of a meeting to be scheduled for the 23rd or
28th of October. Certainly if she had been advised of that
evening's City Counsel meeting, she would have attended and
expressed her opposition to your request for a variance. We intend
to bring this matter up before the counsel at the next meeting, so
that both sides can be heard on this matter.
Irrespective of the outcome of the meeting, and whether the
City grants a variance or not, the encroachments have to be removed
from Ms. Konnad's property.
Mr. Jack Cook
October 21, 1987
Page 3
BERNICK AND STERN
A PROFE:$SlONAL ASSOCIATION
In order that we may advise our client whether legal action is
required, we would appreciate your response at your earliest
opportunity.
Very truly yours,
BERNICF~AND ~TERN, P.A.
David L. Olson
DLO/cmw
Enclosure
cc
Ms. Jan Bertrand
Ms. Sandra J. Konnad
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr.
Mr. Steve Smith
011,5"
I hereby certJy this th~l il i true and correct representation of a survey of File No.
the boundlrtel of the above described land and of the location of all buildings,
DEMARS · GABRIEL if in¥, thereon, and all vi$i~,le encroachments, if any, from or O,~ said land. 5615
LAND SURVEYORS, INC. · / oo /d,v of .SEPT. ,086 Book - Pa~
Plymouth MN 55441 - Scale
Phon.: (~12) 55~-o~S ' !" = 30'
279
October 13, 1987'
RESOLUTION 87- 1 91
P. ESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH PLANNING .C0~ISSION
RECO}~iENDATION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FOR
A NON-CONFORHING STRUCTURE ON LOT 2 INCLUDING _
ADJACENT VACATED STREET, BLOCK 1, AVALON;
PID ~ 19=117-23-2~ 0002 (4452 Denbigh Road) .Y&~ Case No. 87-673
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow an attached deck
with a walkway within zero feet to th=. side property line at the west, add a
second floor.on the existing dwelling within 3.7 feet of the side lot line
and 20 feet to the front property line; and ..
WHEkEAS, the R-2 single family zoning district requires 6 foot side
yards,20 foo~ front yard, and 50 foot lakeside setback to the Ordinary High
Water Elevation of 929.5 N.G.V.D.; and
WHEREAS, SECTION 23.404 Subd. (8) provides that alterations may be made to
a building containing a lawful nonconforming .residential unit when the alteration
will improve the livability thereof but the alteration may not increase the
number of dwelling units.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City ofH°und,'MN.,
as follows:
1. That the City does hereby authorize the existing nonconforming principle
'structure setback lat 4452 Denbigh Road;. PID t19-1'17-23 24 0002. '
2.
The City Council ~uthorizes the existing structural setback violation
and authorizes'the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404,
Subd. (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as
a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and re-
strictions of Section 23.404.
3. It is determined that the livability of the residential.unit will
be improved by authorizing the following alterations to the nonconforming
property:
%
A second story (floor) is to be added to the. existing dwelling within
3J7 feet of the west property line, a'minimum of 6 feet to the east
property line, 50 feet to .the O.H.W. elevation.of 929.5 N.G.V.D. to lakeside,
and 20 feet to the street front property line.
Reduce the deck elevation to within 30 inches from existing ground level '
with a stairway from the patio door down to the lower deck, proceeding
at ground level to the lakeside, and then a stairway to the elevated
deck beginning at the 3.7 foot building setback line.
Upon. the further condition that the existing dwelling must meet State
Building Code, the existing basement entry at zero feet to the property
line be relocated into ~he new construction 'and then to be removed to
ground level, provisions be made to divert water run off away from the
adjoining'property.
Variance approval is valid for one year from the date of this resolution.
280
October 13, 1~87
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmembe~ Jensen and
seconded by Ha¥or Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Abel~ Jensen~ Jessen~ Johnson and Smith.
The following Councllmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Hayor
Attest: City Clerk
TO: Piannlng Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROFI: Jan Bertrand, Bullding Offlclal ~--~
Planning CommisSion Agenda of October 12, 1~87.
CASE NO. 87-673
CASE NO. 87-673
APPliCANT: Jack Cook
LOCATION: ~52 Denblgh Road
LEGAL DESC.:
Lot 2 Including adjacent vacated street, Block 1, Avalon; PID
Number'lg-llT-23 2~ 0002
SUBJECT: Side yard setback variance
EXISTING ZONING:..R-2 Single Family Dwelling
PROPOSAL: The applicant, Jack Cook, Is requesting a variance to allow an attached
deck with a walkway within zero feet to the side property line at the west. The
size of the deck on the north is not Included wlth the application., tie ls also
requesting to add a second floor on this dwelling as well as a.portlofi of .the
attached garage, which was granted und&r the prev!ous varlance Resolution # 86-1011.
The.R-2 ZonJng Dl.s. trlct requ!res a 6. foot side yard, 50 foot lakeshore setback,
a 20 foot f'r'ont, yard s&tbaCk, a l°t slze bf 6~'000 square feet, and a hO foot lot
width. The existing lot is a Conforming parcel, The structure, however, has a
3,7 to a,1 foot setback to the"~est, lot line to the prlnclpa.1 structure, and a'
zero foot side yard setback to an entry~vay to the' basement level of the home.
The attached gar.age. Is under constructlon, at.this, time as well as some of the
other repairs to.the'dwe11~ing ha~e.'gone, beyond the scope of the orlglnal variance
approval. Hr. Cook,' at the'present time,' is under a stop order to ceas'e all modi-
fications to the prlnclpal structure. He Is being allowed to continue wlth the
attached, ga.r.age which Was prevl.ously approved.
The applicant has constructed; the'deck and svalkway at this time, has added patio
doors and vtl. ndows, .and beam supports to get~' ready to add a second .floor to the
dwelling.. The'only difficulty, that Fir. Cook ha~ had with this lot has been the
existing dwelling and !ts close proxlml.t¥ to the west lot line and also to the
right-of-way 'of' Denbigh Road.'
The lot area does meet the reqblrements for the R-2 Zoning Ordinance provisions
and the east property line setback, as well as the lakeshore setback does comply
with the R-2 District requlrem&nts.
RECOI4HENDATION: The staff does not. recommend approval of the walkway along the
west property line. tiowever, the recommendations that the deck walkway be reduced
to within 30 Inches or less from grade within that 3 foot setback could allow steps
down from the patlo door which was Instal.led and than proceed along the walk~ay
and than allow steps to be constructed to the elevated portion of the deck
on lakeside. A slmllar circumstances happened on /4932 Bedford Road for a Fir. Ftark
Jenks in April of this year. Hodlflcatlons to this d~elllng which wouid add a
CASE N0. 8.7-673
Page 2
second floor within 3:7 feet of the west lot.line could be all'wed, iF. the ovmer
made prov'$slons to reduce overhang projections as Well as a plan for dlvertlng
water away from th&.adJacent neighbors. Also, the existing basement entry could
be remdved from the building and provisions made for the remodeling of' the second
floor to ~ln¢lude a stairway that would extend Into the basement.
The' abutting neighbors 'have been n~>tlfled.
This wlil be referred to the City Counc11 on October
· ~3, lg87.
O~OCT' ~E¢'° ?' CITY O; ~OU,D
- ~-~ --...~..~...., .... ~
' ' ~ .. ~ ,.....,.,,. ~ APPLICATION TO PLANNING S ZONING CO~HlSSlON
' ' ' ---'-. '; '(Please type the foll~lng Inf~rmtlo~
Fee Pald
Da~e Flled ~-~a=.p?
0 /
Legal Description of Property: Lot'
Addition ~ PID No. /9-//? - .~Y .,~/
Address
Day Phone No.~
Applicant '(if other than owner):
Nam~
· . Day Phone No.
Address
Type of Request:
(/~) Variance ( ) Condltlonal Use Permit
( ) Zoning Interpretations Review
(.') ~etland Permit ( ) P,U.O.
*If other, specify:
(.) Amendment
( ) Sign Permit
( )*Other -.
~resent ~onlng Dlst~ct"
Exlstln" Use(s) of Property' ~/~ ~_ ~4~_~ ~.. /~.~/, '
Co, ed. of previous rasolutions shall accompany present request.
ertlfy that all of the above statements and t~e statements contained In any requlred
ap~rs or pians.to"be submitted herewith are true and accurate· I consent to the entry
or upon the premises dascrlbed In this application by any authorized official of the City
of Hound for'the purpose.of Inspecting, or of posting, ~aintalnlng 'and re~vlng ~uch
notices as.,ay be..requlre~by
Signature'of Applicant
Plannlng Commission Reco ndatlon:
Date
10-12~87
Council Action:
Resolutlon No.
Request for Zonl.ng Variance Procedure Case
(Z):
D. Location of: Slgns, easements~ underground utilities, etc.
E. Indicate North compass direction ~
.F. Any addltlonal Information as may reasonabl~ be required by the City Staff
and appllcable Sections o~ the Zoning Ordinance.
III, ~e~uest for a Zonln~ Varl..a~c~
A. Ali Information below, a slte plan, as descrlbed In Part I1, and general
....application must be provided before a hearing wI11 be scheduled.
B. Does the present use of. the property'confOrm toad1 use regulations fOr
the zone district In which it Is located2 Yes (/~) No ( )
If "no", specify each non-conforming use=
Do the existing structure~ comply ~ith a11 area helgl~t.and bulk regulations
for the zon~ district In ~hlch It Is.located? Y~ (/~ No'( ) '
If 'no"~ specify each non-conforming use~.
(~') .Too narrow (~ Topography ( ) Sol1 ..
' ( ) Too small ..'. ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface
~-..(.- ) .. Too shallow .. ( ) ' Shape: - ( ) Other= Spei:lfy:
l~hlch unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent Its
reasonable .use for any of the uses permitted In that zoning dlstrlct'~
Nas the hardship d~scrlbed a~ove createdby the action of anyone having
property Interests In the land' after the Zoning Ordinance was ~dopted?
Yes ( ) No (~) if yes, explaln: .
F. Was the harashlp created by'any'o.t~er man-matte change, such as the reloca-
tlon of a road2 Yes ( )(~No If yes, explain: . .
I~. Are.'the conditions of hardship for'which you request a variance pecu. l lar
only to the.property descrlbed In this petltlon? Yes '."( ) ~No
If no, how .many othe, r propgrtles are slmilarly~.affected?
from the areg-bulk regulatlons
(Speclfy~ using
Attach additional
Nill granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property In the
same zone~or to the enforcement of this ordinance2
Fl..~hat is t'he "minimum" modlflcatlon (variance)
that ~Ill permit you to mak& reasonable use 'of your land?
maps, site plans with.dimensions and ~rltten explanation.
sheets, If necessary.)
" RESOLUTION NO. 86- lOti
I~ESOLUT'ION TO CONCUR WITH TNE PLANNIN~ COI~ISSION TO
APPROVE A 3. FOOT sIDE:YARD SETBACK AND ·12.5 FOOT STREET
FRONT SETBACK FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 1, AVALON, PID ~ 1~-117-23
2q 0002 .P S Z Case'tlO. 86-538 (qq$2 Denblgh Road)
"WHEREAS, Jack Cook~. owner of the parcel .described .as Lot 2, Block 1,
Avalon, PID # 1~.-117-23 2/t 0002; has appl.led for a side yard and front yard
setback to a11&w the construction of an attached garage of 20 by..2~ foot within
12 to.13 fe&t of the front property' line and zero feet to'the slde property; and
"'I~IEREAS, 'Clty Code requires a {~ 'foot glde yard s'etback and a 20 foot
fron~: yard setback to'the.prln.clpal bulldlng In the R-2 Slngle Fatally Resld. entlal
District; and - . ..
WXERE/~S,'the Planning Commission has reviewed'the request and does recom-
mend a v. arlance with .sma& modl flc~tlon '. to 'the appt lcantts, request, to afford the
property owner reasonable use of bls land. '
NO~,.'THEREFORE', .BE IT RESOLVED 'th;l~'t'he Clty Councl. l of the l:;l~y of_
Hound,. Minnesota, does hereby approve a 3 foot side yard setback and a 1.2.5 foot
attached garage with j~o
front yard setback to allow the construction of a
¢losu'r['of tl~e exlstlng 'basement ~tal rway due .to .the. narrowne_.ss and. topography
of the i~roperty for Lot 2, Block 1,.'Avalon (Zi~52 Denblgh ROad) PlO ~
oooz. .
The foregolng resolutlon was moved by Councilmember Paulsen and
secondec~ by Councilmember Peterson.
The following Councl 1members vo~ed · In the affirmative: · Jessen~ Paulsen, Peterson, Polston and Smith;
The. follc;.wlng .Cou.ncllmembers vote. d In the negative:
· nOlle,
e
~ayor
At:est: City Clerk
,. I :
,4
DE.~iARS - GABRIEL
LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
$050 I"(Imor I.&n~ NO.
Piy~.OUlh MN ~5441
I hereby cerldy thlt this is I tl'ue Ind COrlVCt reprcse~io~ o( I w'~e~
I=.~e No.
!
.j
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAY~NOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
October 23, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL~,
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
RESOLUTION 87-145
At the City Council meeting of August 11, 1987, the enclosed
resolution was passed by the City Council. This resolution was
developed upon the conversation at the meeting with Mark Lundgren
of Balboa, Inc. Mark had indicated that he thought that Toro
could live with the resolution, partioulartly as it applied to
item ~7 which deals with the trailer activity behind the-Toro
building along Lynwood Boulevard. As you recall, Mr. Allen Shay,
5348 Lynwood Blvd., and Mrs. Gay Hoftelg, 2216 Noble Lane, were
present to state their opposition to Balboa's request for trailer
storage. The trailer activity item dealt with Toro specifically
and Mr. Shay had indicated that the noise from the trailer
activity between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM, woke he and
his family up. He felt that this should not be allowed. Since
August l 1 th, when the resolution was passed, Mr. Shay has called
the police department on two occasions and the Mayor on one
occasion (4:20 AM) indicating his .disappointment in Toro not
following what the resolution had called for. In early October,
following the phone call to Mayor Smith, I contacted Balboa and
indicated to them that the resolution was not being followed.
Mark Lundgren indicated that he would contact Toro to inform them
of their responsibility to comply with Resolution 87-145. Upon
receipt of the letter and resolution enclosed, Toro immediately
contacted Balboa and myself regarding the difficulty in which to
comply with item #7. I met with Mark Lundgren and Jim Bruha. We
discussed Mr. Shay's complaints and what could be done regarding
the compliance to the resolution. Mr. Bruha indicated that it is
absolutely necessary that Toro be allowed to have trailer
activity between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. He indicated
that noise can be minimized as much as possible, but that the
requirement not to allow any activity would make his business
operations very difficult to carry out. In other words, Mr.
Bruha has indicated that Toro would seriously have to consider
leaving the Mound facility because they would not be allowed to
operate during the early morning hours.
Memo to Mayor and Council - Toro
October 23, 1987
Page 2
I indicated to Mr. Bruha that it was the City's intent not to
have Toro "pull up stakes" and leave our community as they are a
vital economic resource to it. However, I did indicate that
possibly some "middle ground" could be reached so that the
neighbors across from Toro and Toro itself could co-exist
happily. Mr. Bruha did remind me that the area where he f's
loc_ated is zgn~4~dus.$rt~l under 9ur ?_~ln~ ordin~-~-~ and the
t~aci-lity has_been there many, manv_ve~rs~ Mr. Bruha indicated
that h~ould con6'act hr. b~a~ and-v~sit with him personally to
discuss the matter further. I told him that it was imperative
that a change in the resolution would have to be reconsidered by
the City Council. That is why it is back ~n the agenda. Mr.
Bruha did contact Mr. Shay and Mr. Shay is still adamant about
the noise from the trailer activity in the early morning hours.
On Monday, October 19th, Mr. Shay and~r, Hofteil called me at
home at approximately 11:00 PM, indicating again that there'was
trailer activity in the Toro lot. I told them that this would be
discussed at the October 27th Council meeting. Mr. Bruha has
included a letter in the packet dated October 22, 1987,
indicating that this is a very serious COncern 'of the Toro
Company in that they be allowed to operate between the'hours of
10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. Mr. Bruha and Mr. Lundgren will both be
present at the Council meeting on Tuesday. By the way, the
neighbors across the street will also be there.
It is. my suggestion that the City Council attempt to reach some
middle ground, so that Toro does not break its lease with Balboa
and leave our City due to this condition of Resolution 87-1~5.
At the same time, the neighbors across the street have to be
dealt with fairly.
ES:la '
198
Augus~ 11, 1987
RESOLUTION #87-145
RESOLUT.ION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO APPROVE A REVISION TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
GRANTED TO BALBOA MN. CORP, IN RESOLUTION #8~-87
SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
~IHEREAS, the City Council on August 11, 1987, held a public hearing
pUrsuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances to consider the
amendment of item 2(j) of the Resolution 85-87 to pe[~nit the parking of
trailers at 5340 Shoreline Boulevard~ and
WHERE~9, the subject property is within the Light Industrial (I-l) zone
Which allows such uses; and
WHEREAS, the subject 'property has been established as a Planned
Industrial Area (PIA) which allows such uses by Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, .the Planning Commission reviewed the request and does recommend
approval; and
WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be he~rd were heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minn&sota, that Condition 2(j) of Resolution 85-87 is hereby amended to permit
· the perking of trailers at 5340'Shore.line Boulevard st'.bject to the following
condi t ions:
Ail existing construction debris within the area shall be removed
immediately.
' 2.
Dust-free surfacing in the trailer parking area shall be
maintained at all times.
Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, Balboa Minnesota
shall submit a landscapiog plan showing screening along Lynwood
Boulevard for review and .approval by the City Planner.
Landscaping shall be installed within 60 days of the date of this
resolution.
4. Trailers and trucks within the parking area and on the remaining
~ Balboa property shall be directly involved with tenant businesses.
No trailers shall be allowed to remain parked on the site for
longer than 30 days.
6. The trailer storage area shall remain trash free at all times.
Be
N° activity shall occur in the trailer parking area between
hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. ·
Trailer lqcations 'shall be as shown on the site plans dated June
25, 1987.
· No outside storage is permitted except by operations permit.
The Toro Company
Home Improvement Division
5300 Shoreline Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota 55364
612-472-8300 · Telex 290428 · Facsimile 472-5588
DATE:
October 22, 1987
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. Edward Schukle, Jr.
City Manager
Mound, Minnesota
James Bruha
Managing Director of Operations
Home Improvement Division
Mound, Minnesota
RESOLUTION #87-145 ITEM 97
As per our conversation.last week, I am looking forward'to
discussing this issue with the City Council on the evening of
October 27. This issue is of great concern to the Toro Company.
and we basically consider this a life threatening issue.
I would like to thank you for your help and consideration in this
matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
give me a call.
Sincerely,
~uha
CC:
Mark Lundgren
The.Balboa Group
5340 Shoreline Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Ron Zamansky
Doherty, Rumble and Butler
Attorneys at Law
3750 IDS Tower
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN
JB/jc
6.18
TI i!~ I.~AI.IM)A
((,1 ') 4'72-1-11)~
October 1, 1987
Mr. Jim Bruha
Toro H.I.D.
5300 Shoreline Blvd.
Mound; Mn. 55364
Dear Jim,
I recieved a phone call this morning from Ed Schukle at the City
of Mound offices. As you are aware we have recieved a Revision to
the Conditional Use Permit for the parking of trailers in our
rear lot. Attached is a copy of that Resolution, which states no
activity shall occur in the trailer parking ares between the~hours
of'10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
This condition falls in line with the normal hours set by the
State of Minnesota guidelines for trailer parking. Please be
advised that it is extremely important to function within these
hours. We are bordered by a heavy residential area on the North
side of this lot, and it is important to the residents that the
hours be observed. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Mark Lundgren
cc: Ed Schukle
Richard M. Smith
6600 Mohawk Trail
Edina, Mn. 55435
October 19, 1987
~City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, Mn. 55364
Attn: C~ty Manager
Attn:· . Jan Bertrand·
S.ubjec't~ .2867 Wes%edge Blvd.
Lot 11,-Block 2
- ..-Westwood - ·
Dear Jan:
o
I respectfully requ~ a .hearing before the Mound City
Council ~on their"Oc{ober Council Meeting regarding our
ongo~.~g problems wi~h; this particular residentail building
On June 26, 1986 we~were issued a building permit No. 7273
and after digging a few test holes on this site, we notified
your office that w~!%~ianned to modify the plan of the home
proposed for this sit.e since we encountered what appeared to
be an old burned dump' site. We employed the services of
Notch Engineering to check .the soil conditions and structural
capabilities of the site and GME Engineering to do a detailed
soil boring analysis of the site. We modified the plan and
in June of 1987 we planned to start construction on this home
after a one year delay. We submitted to your office the
revised plans and the test reports from GME Engineering Co.
and. further stated that we would p~oceed to ppen up the
excavation to see just what we did run into. Our plan was to
excavate all of the non compactible material, oversize the
hole and take the basement footings to the original clay
lying under this dump site. This was as detailed in our
engineer's report and we further planned to backfill the
basement foundation walls with clay and construct the home on
a compacted soil condition.
Apparently Tonka Toys submitted a letter to MPCA indicating
they had dumped hazardous materials somewhere in the Mound or
Woodcrest area and further stated there might be the possibility
of methane gas at this particular site. Obviously, we tried to
cooperate with MPCA and asked for meetings out at the site so
they could see exactly what was there. I did not feel we
Page 2
could get the problem solved by their sitting in their
offices in St. Paul and I again asked GME to intercede on
our behalf to see what MPCA'actually wanted before we could
proceed with construction.
I refer you to GME's letter dated September 28, 1987 which
more or less summarizes the MPCA position and you can rest
assured that on page.2 when they suggested I check the entire
area to make sure everything was clean with my cost in excess
of $200,600.00, i o~viously declined. ~°
I have owned this lot for a great number of years, have
paid taxes and special assessments for all of these years.
I originally purchased this lot from the.State of Minnesota
in a tax forfeitur~..land sale.
I have also spent several thousand dollars with GME Consultants
for their engineerin.g reports which were submitted to your office
-as well as"MPCA and have'spent an additional $1,500.00 for
-Notch Engineering .to'analyze the conditions as they see them
in the field.
'We proceeded to dig the proposed basement area and
excavated approximately 70%of the required area before
being stopped. We'encountered no methane gas and although
we were. willing to take soil samples for heavy metal and
or other toxic chemicals, MPCA merely continued to. state
their pOsition that some ~ime in the future they would
probably'do a thorough 'soils investigation in the'area that
apparently Tonka Toys indicated was at one time a dump site.
I am ~re that sometime down the road the MPCA and the federal
~A will get around to checking this site, however, in the
meantime we have a location with a customer that wants this
home, is aware of the soil conditions at the site and my
request to council is merely to make a field investigation
and determination if a building permit could be issued, again.
I would appreciate any consideration you and the Mound Council
could extend on this issue.
MS/js
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2083 East Center C,rcle / Mmneapohs, MN 55441 / 812/559-1859
II
I'll
I
September 28, 1987
Mr. Richard Smith
6600 Mohawk-Trail ' '~
Edina, Minnesota 55435-'-
RE: Summ;~ of'recent conversations with the City u~f Mound and
the MinnesOta Pollution Control Agency regarding the proposed
residence on We~.t~E~ge. ~- . . Boulevard in Mound, Minnesota
On september 9,~[987,~u contacted me regarding the 'acquisition of
a building.-Permit'frq~-~he.City of'Mound, for'a proposed, residence
-on west' Edge Bo~l'evard~' ..This .letter serves, as' a'. stunmary of
cqnversations that .~J'i~have had 'in the last 2 weeks, with Ms.. Jan
Bertran~of t~e City~--~]Mound, and Mr. Shaun RuotsinOja of the
~innesota Psllution Control Agency.
On Septemb~.r~ ~1, %987~~ I contacted'Ms. Bertrand, to 'discuss the
qualifications necessary..for you to continue construction of this
residence.. '~Ms. Bertrand did acknowledge that at one time a building
permit..~had been.=issued, -however, the building design' was changed,
-and a new building perm~.'~ application was made..She then summarized
the events le~ding to.~r..decision not to issue a new building
permit, stipulatin~ ·%hat if the MPCA~would allow, she would issue a
..'new building-p~rmit for;'the relocated house.
After dis~u~'si~n ~ september -16, 1987 'with Mr. Ruotsinoja, he
explained that '.the Tonka Corporation had informed the MPCA that they
had disposed'~of potentially hazardous material in an area of Mound
described as~e Woodcrest Site.-'Your'"bUilding lot is,considered by
the State'to ~e..within the boundaries of this site. The presence of
-.refuse at your'--"'-'lot .--was confirmed by data collected during-'a
.~.subsurface ...e~xploration by GME, .the results 'of which are summarized=
'i~ our ~report/dated .October "21, 1986. I explained to Mr.
Ruotsinoja, that .you'-would do what is reasonably necessary to
'determine if~hazardous substances exist on the lot. .After a short'
..-. discussion, -it.was agreed to by the MPCA.that at 3 locations within
the building ~xcavat~on, we would collect samples for chemical
~- -analysis~---'<L~Onveye~'.-this i~formation to you. '-
-~i On September-.~8,~%[987, I received a call frbm Mr. Ruotsinoja~ He
.... explained thlt the ~PcA had taken a new position concerning the
'Woodcrest dump~ and that it bore directly upon your lot on West Edge
..Boulevard. He further-explained that the Federal EPA, and the State
GEOTECHNICAL · MATERIALS · ENVIRONMENTAL SOILS '
WILLIAM C. KWASNY, P,E. THOMAS 13. VENEMA, P,E, WILLIAM E, BLOEMENDAL E,I,T,
Mr. Richard Smith
2
September 28, 1987
MPCA had agreed that a comprehensive site investigation was
warranted to evaluate the Dresence of Dotentiall¥ hazardous
substances on the Woodcrest Site. It was his understanding at the
time, that no investigation had been completed, and that it could
take up to a year and a half before this work is done. ~e also said
that no part of this site could be investigated separately, but that
the entire site must be evaluated before any parcel can be
cohsidered "clean". 'He suggested, that you could investigate the
entire site on your Own, but acknowledged that the cost could be in
excess $200,000..
Withthis ~ew development, I conveyed this information to you, and
consider the subject:,t closed until an investigation by a State or
Federal Agency is completed.
If you have any questi.o~ regarding this letter, please feel free to
contact me or Mr. Wil!i-_Am C.-Kwasny.
sincerely .... ~ :
-GME CONSULTANTS, -.INC.
/- ' ~ ' ' 7:'~- '
· ' '~. o _ · . T% -
William ~. 'Kwasny,-P,~.
Principal Engineer '-~-
WJC:WCK:bjs :
GME CONSULTANTS. INC.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
October 21, 1987
Ms. Jan Bertrand
Building .Inspector
City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Ms. Bertrand:
RE: Development of Woodcrest Dump
This letter serves to confirm our conversation of October 14, 1987, in which' we
discussed the Woodcrest Dump (Site) and the proposed development of lot 11,
block 2, of Woodcrest. We understand that you are considering not issuing the
developer of lot 11 a building permit, and are asking the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency-¢MPCA) staff to inform you in writing of the MPCA staff's
position regarding future investigations at the Site.
As I informed you, the MPCA staff will not comment on whether development of
lot 11 should occur. However, the MPCA staff has reason to believe that
hazardous substances may have been disposed of at the Site, and-therefore, an
investigation to determine the presence and extent of contamination of soil and
ground water is warranted.
The MPCA staff has proposed to conduct a federally funded Site Inspection at the
Site sometime in 1988. However, the MPCA staff is also willing to provide (as
time allows) technical assistance, including'the review of work plans and
results,, if other parties are interested in conducting their own investigations
at the Site.
If you have any questions, please call me at 296-7375.
Shawn Ruotstnoja
Site Assessment Unit
Site Response Section
Ground Water and Solid Waste Division
SR:ls
Phone:.
520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Regional Offices · DuluthlBrainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer
Richard M. Smith
6600 Mohawk Trail
Edina, Mn. 55435
CityMa~ager.
City of Mound
~5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound,~.Mn. 55364
Attn: -City Manager ~.
Attn: J~n Bertrand
Subjecti:
October 19, 1987
Final Plat'- Seton Place
Planning Commi'ssion Case ~-507 and 6-508
.Preliminary Plat Conditional Use- Resolution NO. 86-53
.... Final Pla~.~Approval~-. Resolution No. 86-100
Dear Jan~
Due to'circumstances beyond my control the final plat for
Seton PlaCe has nog been filed or re~orded and in fact
--~Artical D or the fihal plat Resolution No. 86-100 was not
'I respectfully requ%st a hearing with the Mound City
Council requesting.a~'extension of the final plat approval
contained in ~esolu~ion No~ 86-100. I would also like to
.... point out that no changes, variances, or'modifications to
-- the 6riginal Approved plat were mad~ from the August 26, 1986
'meeting to the m~eti~g scheduled for October, 1987.
As you kn~w~ '%he original permits issued for this development
have all'expired and we have now obtained reapprovals and
extensions on the following required permits.
A. MWCC'permit for connection' of lift station has expired
but an extension has been obtained.
B...The ~CA appear~to be current. They do not indicate 'an expiration ~a%e.
C~ Minnesota Health Department permit is current with an
expiration dat~ now indicated for 8-18-88.~
~ D. .'Minnesota Watefcreek and Watershed permit has expired and
at the Watershed meeting October 15, 1987we obtained
approval and a one ~'ear extension .to our application.
We pointed out We p~nted out to the watershed committee
that our'efforts were to get the sewer and water in and
completed by the end of 1987.
E. The Hennepin County Entrance permits ha~e been obtained
and an extension granted with a slight modification.
Hennepin County would have Preferred to see 3 curb cuts
instead of the original approved 4 and we have agreed.
We have agreed to have a single curb cut for Lots 1 and 2,
a single curb cut for Lots 3 and 4 and where we showed 2
curb cuts for Lots 5 and 6 we will now use a shared curb
cut for these last two lots.
We sincerely appreciate your consideration of our request
and your prompt approval will enable us to commence construction.
on the sewer and water before Noven~Ser 1, 1987.
Sincerely yours,
-Richard.M.. Smith.
160
August 26, 1986
RESOLUTION NO. 86- 100
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF SETON PLACE
FID# 24-117-24 14 0037/0038/0039/0013, LOTS 7,8, & 9,
BLOCK 29, ANq) FART OF LOT 6, BLOCK 18, SETON ·
PLANNING COb~ISSION CASE #86-507 AND 508, ~NCtUD1
CITY ENGINEER"S RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE STORM SEWER & DRAINAGE DITCN
k~EREAS, the final plat of Seton Place has been submitted in the
· manner required Cot platting of land under the City of Mound Ordinance Code,
Section 22.00 and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statutes and
proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and
~EREAS, the City Council, on May 13, 1986, held a public hearing
pursuant to Section 22.00, Chapter 22, of the Mound City Code of Ordinances,
to Consider the approval of the preliminary plat and final plat requirements
for Seton Place subdivision located on property described as follows:
Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 29, and Part of Lot 6, Block 18, Seton Addition
also known asPID# 24-117-24 14 0037/0038/0039/0013
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects'consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and the requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the City Code of the City of Mound,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mound, 'Minnesota;.
A. Plat approval is granted for Seton Place requested by Richard M. Smith
upon compliance withthe following requirements:
1. As .per final plat, Exhibit "A" .
2. Completion of the requirements and conditions listed in Resolution 86-53.
3. 'The Developer is to sign a Development Contract and furnish to the
City a performance bond in the amount of $~T88~ to cover grading
and utility construction as'per plans approved by 'the City Engineer.
Approval is to be submitted from all agencies requiring review, such
as MCk~, FSi'CC, Minnesota Health Department, Hennepin County, etc.
5. Approval of all final grading and utility plans by the City Engineer. ~
e
Submit additional escrow funds of $1,000.00 to defray city costs
for Engineering, Legal, and Planning fees and any additional amounts
that may be charged against said account under City Ordinance Section
22.40.
7. Approval of the land title by the City Attorney.
8. Submit Soil Test Reports as required and approved by the City Engineer.
Park dedication in the amount of the fee which is applicable at the
'time of building permit issuance, but in no case less than 5300.00 per
dwelling unit. ~
161
August 26, 1986
10.
Any deficient sewer unit charges will be paid in the amount of $292,
for each deficient sewer unit upon issuance of the building permit',
Ce
That the City Clerk'is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this
Resolutioh to the above named owner and subdivider after completion of the
requirements for his.use as required by M.S.A. 462.358.
That the Mayor and City Manager.are hereby author)zed to execute the
Certificate of Approval on behalf of the City Council upon compliance with
the foregoing resolution.
This final plat shall be Filed and recorded~withln 60 days of the date of
the signing of the hardshells by the Mayor and City Manager in accordance
with Section 22.00 of the City Code'and shall be recorded'wlthln 180 days
of the adoption date of this Resolution with one copy being filed with the
.!
City of Mound.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Copncilmember Peterson and
seconded by Councilmember Paulsen.
The following Councilmembers voted'in the affirmative:
Paulsen, Peterson a~d Polston.
The.following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Jessen and Smith.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
RESOLUTION //86-100 (EXHIBIT "A")
*' . is. l,;~ ·-'-_
'"" '~'-' "'~-
!i :-," .,.~ ', -,
!!ql ~11t I! l,t :!l|!
ill-,-,.., ,,-,,-,, ,-,-- .. ·. ~:,-:,,,,~-! }l [,
,,. --.. -.-,... :. - ~! ,,bt !
.._ ,,.,,
~,' "":> "'~' ~ ~ d~1 Mi,i,
/
\
\ o
\
\_
0 \
- \
May 13, 1986
RESOLUTION NO. 86-53
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR A
SIX (6) LOT SUBDIVISION AS AMENDED DENYING THE
SIDE YARD VARIANCES OF LOTS ?, 8 & 9, BLOCK 29,
AND PART OF LOT 6, BLOCK 18, SETION, PID NUMBERS
2~-117-24 14 0037/0038/0039/0013
PLANNING COMMISSION CASE ~86-507 & 508
WHEREAS, the City Council on May 13, 1986, held a publi~
hearing pursuant to Section 22.00, Chapter 22, Mound Code of
Ordinances, to consider approval of a preliminary plat for Seton
Place, issuance of a Conditional Use Permit and approval of
variances for the establishment of, twin homes on six (6) lots
located on property described as Lots 7, 8 & 9., Block 29 and Part
of Lot 6, Block 18, Seton; and
WHEREAS, twin homes are allowed in the Two-Family
Residential (R-3) zone by Conditional' Use Permit in accordance
with Section 23.610.3 of the Mound Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the applicant requested a 3 foot side .yard
variance for Lot 2, a 3 foot side yard variance and a 5 f-oct
front yard'vari'ance~for Lot 3, a 3'foot side yard variance and a
17' foot front yard variance for Lot 4 and a 3 foot side yard
variance for Lot 5; and
WHEREAS, the proposed front yard variance satisfies the
criteria for granting variances as stated in Section 23.506.1 of
the Mound Zoning Code and the Conditional Use Permit satisfies
the criteria for granting Conditional Use Permits as stated in
Section 23.505.1 of the Mound Zoning Code; and
'WHEREAS, the Planning Commission. has reviewed the
request and. does recommend a conditioned approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City C~uncil of
the City of MoUnd, Minnesota:
Preliminary Plat, Cohditiona.1 Use Permit and the rear yard
variance for Seton Place (Case #86-507) are approved subject
to the following requirements:
Per plat on file at Mound City Hall, dated March 25,
1986.
2. Posting of a subdivision escrow in the amount of $1,000.
Payment of park dedication in the amount of the fee
which is applicable at the time of building permit
issuance, but in no case less than $300.00 per unit.
May 13, 1986
A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the City
Engineer prior to the recording of the final plat.
Drainage and utility easements shall be shown in
conformance with the City En§ineer's recommendations.
That failure on the part of the applicant to submit a
final plat per Section 22.13 within one year from the
date of this approval shall deem the preliminary
approval to be null and void·
The following variance is approved:
- Lots 3 and 4 : 20 to 22 foot rear yard variance,
subject to LMCD approval, to compensate for the MWCC
lift station in the front of the parcel.
Any modification from this variance shall require review
by the Planning Commission and City Council.
7. The side yard variances requested are DENIED·
8. Subject to other State and Local agency approval~ where
applicable.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
.Peterson and seconded by Mayor Polston.
.The following Counoilmember$ voted in the affirmative:
paulsen, Peterson, Polston and smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Jessen.
Mayor
Attest: City. Clerk
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAY~NOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager ,~-~
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
DATE: October 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Kent & Leslie Westberg
6280 Deerwood Drive
A variance was approved to allow a travel trailer at a construction
site for new residence. The owner is requesting an extension untT1
the 5th of November. ! do not believe the structure nor the basement
of the home will be completed by that date. As of today, the sheet-
rock is being installed; but is not finished, no plumbing fixtures
set, no appliances, no light fixture, no finished flooring, etc.
~ 7'7-6
RESOLUTION 87-181
-RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO GRANT A VARIANCE TO
TEMPORARILY PLACE A TRAVEL TRAILER
AT 6260 DEERWOOD'DRIVE, LOT 4, BLOCK ~,
WOODCREST; PID#23-117-24 23 0100
P $ Z CASE #87-668
WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. & Mrs. Kent Westberg, has applied for
a variance to a11o~, a travel trailer to be used as temporary living quarters;
and
WHEREAS, the city code 23.709 and the R-1 zoning district provisions
do not allow, travel trailers as a residence; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
does recommend approval with restrictions. ''
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City.Council of the Clty of Mound, MN.
that the variance to allow a temporary travel trailer as a residence until
October 26, 1987 to allow the completion of the dwelling being constructed at
6260 Deerwood Drive, PID#23-117-24 23 0100 as shown on Exhibit"A" is hereby
granted.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
CASE NO. 87-670
RESOLUTION NO. 87- ..
RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING
STRUCTURE TO ALLOW AN ADDITION FOR LOTS 1,2,3,4,5
.AND THE EAST 10 FEET OF LOT 6, AND THE VACATED PORTION
OF THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT, BLOCK 24, SETON;
PID # 19-117-23 24 0044/0045 (4619 CARLOW ROAD)
WHEREAS, the applicant has app]ied for a variance to recognize an
existing non-conforming 7.7 foot front yard setback for lots I thru 5, and the
East 10 feet of Lot 6, and the ~djacent vacatedstreet right-of-way, Block 24,
Seton; PID Numbers 19-117-23 24 0044/0045; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 Single Famil'y
Zoning District, which according to the City Code,' requires a 20 foot front yard
setback, 4 foot side yard setback to accessory buildings, a '50 foot )akeshore
setback and a 6 fOot side yard; and
WHEREAS, Section 23.404(8) provides that alterations, may be made to a
building containing a lawful non-conforming residential unit when the al'teration
will improve the livabillty thereof, but the alteration may not increase the
number of units; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does
recommend approval with conditions. ..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE.SOLVED by the City COuncil of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the City does hereby authOrize existing non-conforming principal
structure setback'at 46'19 Carlow Road; PID 19-117-23 24 0044/0045.
2. The City Council authorizes existing structural setback violation
and authorizes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subd.(8)
with the clear'and express understanding .that the use remains as a lawful'non-
conforming use subject to all .the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
3.' It is determined that the livability of the residential unit will
be improved by'authorizing the following alterations to the non-conforming use
property:
Expansion of the prlnclpa)' structure wlth a 14 foot by 21 foot +
one story three season porch on crawl space as shown on the slt~
plan identified as Exhibit A.
CASE NO. 87-670
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand,'Suilding Official 2,~/l~
Planning Commission Agenda of October 1 987
CASE NO. 87-670
APPLICANT: Don & Jan Larson
LOCATION: 4619 Carlow Road
LEGAL DESC.:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and East 10 feet of 6, and the adjacent part
of street vacated along the same; Block 24, Seton; PID Numbers
19-117-23.24 0044/0045
SUBJECT: Front yard setback v~rlance
EXISTING ZONING: R-2 Single Family
PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to add a 14 foot by 21 foot+one story
three season addition to the living space of the existing home. T--he existing
structure is 7,7 feet from the north property l.lne. The three season addition
being proposed would be 10.5 feet to the north street front property line.
Theother setbacks on the lot meet the City Zoning Code provisions.
The R-2 Zoning District requires a 4 foot'side yard. to accessory structures, a
20 foot front Yard setback and'a 50 foot lakeshore setback.
COMMENTS: The existing dwelling has several roof lines'which make it difficult
to add onto the structure in another location. The pub)lc right-of-way was platted
at a 66 foot wid~ major arterial width in this neighborhood. Prior to 1964, 8 feet
of thls right-of-way was vacated On the north and south side of the street. The
curb llne is 15.2 feet to the property line. The submitted survey does not indi-
cate the 8 foot vacated portion as there is a separate tax parcel for this vacated
portion of the street. The dwelling on the survey indicates an encroachment of .3
feet into the right-of-way which is incorrect,. The proposed addition would be 10.5
foot from the property line and 25.7 from the curb llne. The other setbacks on.
the property do meet zoning code provisions.
The Builder was requesting', in his application, that the City grant a blanket
variance for the homeowner to do any modifications in the future. However, the
Zoning Ordinance provisions do not allow structural modifications on non-conforming
buildings without a variance approval for each modification.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested variance upon the con-
dition that no further modifications be made without variance approval, and
that the tax parcel for the 8 foot vacated portlon of the property be combined as
one tax parcel.
The abutting neighbors have been notified.
This will be referred to the City Council on October 27, 1987.
McOoml:)s-Knutson Associates, Inc,
12800 Industrial Park Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55441
612/559-3700
1-800-328-8322 Ext. 784
Oc~obe~ 6~ 1~87
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Ms. Oan Bertrand
Planning and Zoning
City of Mound
5~41 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
SUBOECT:
Zoning Variance - Lots 1 - 5
and East iO' Lot 6, Biock 24, Seton
Case #87-670
~<A #2113
Dear 3an:
As requested, we have researched the probiem with that portion of Cariow
Road which was previousiy vacated. The City of Mound did vacate 8 feet of
Cariow Road adjacent to this property in I964, but evidentiy the resoiution was
never properiy recorded. The resoiution no. is 64-88. Fran wiii certify a.
copy of this. resoiution, which can be passed on to the property owner for
recording and subseqUentiy, be added to the property description of this
parcei. With the addition of the 8 foot street vacation, the existing house
setback from the street right-of-way wouid be 7.7 feet and the proposed.
addition setback wouId be i0.5 feet.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please
contact us.
Very truly yours,
McCOHBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
$C: jmj
Planning Commission H|nutes ·
October ]2, 1987
'3.
Case'No. 87-670. Front yard setback variance, for 4619 CarlowRoad
Lots 1,2,3,4,5 and E. l0 feet of 6, and adjacent part of street wacated
along the same; Block 24, Seton; PID~'s 19-117-23 24 0044/0045
Owner Don [arson and Contractor Richard Rucinski were present. ..
The Building Official explained %he request to add a 14 foot by 21 foot
one story three season addition to the existing'home on the north. The
survey submitted does show encroachment, but that is incorrect. Mr.
Larsonhas letter showing 8 foot street vacation was done in 1964. The
road. was platted at 66 foot wide. Present structure is 25.7 feet to curb
line; there is quite a bit of right-of-way. She noted that she had ex-
plained the Ordinance requires a variance for each structural modifcation
to the applicant. Staff recommends approval of the requested variance
with condition no further modifications be made without variance approval
and tax parcel for 8 foot vacated portion of Carlow Road adjacent-to this
property becombined with this property.
Andersen moved' and Weiland seconded a motion to recommend approval of
the-staff's recomendation. Thevote was unanimouslyin favor.
This will be on the City Council Agenda October 27, 1987.
CITY OF HOUND
APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHIS$10N
(Please type the followlng information)
Case No. ~7- 47.
Fee Paid _~a ~
D~te Filed ~.~-~?
1. Street Address of Property
2. Legal Description of Property: Lot~ 1_:>_~_1,_~; y~ ~* ~n ,-,~' ~ Block ?/~
Addition Set;grt PID No. /~ - //7- 4~ &~~~
3. Owner's Name ~o~ ~ Ja~ ~so~ Day Phone No. 1:?O-~.
Address &619 Carlow
Applicant"(if other than owner): Richard Rucinski 5217 Phelps,Mound,Mn.
Name Day Phone No. I:?~ 7~5~
Address
Type of Request:
e
Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit
Zoning Interpretation $ Review
Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D.
( ) Amendment
( ) Sign Permit
( )*Other
*If other, specify:
Present Zoning District
Existing Use(s) of Property
Has an application.ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or
other zoning procedure for this property? ~_~ If so, list date(s) of
list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s)
Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request.
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained In any required
papers or plans tO be submitted herewith are true and a'ccur~te. I consent to the entry in
or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City
of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be, required by ]~w.. , ,~ .~.~2..~.~
Signature o' Appiicant /~~~~ Da
Planning Commission Reco~endation: Approval of staff's recommendation.
Council Action:
Resolution No.
Oate 7
Request for Zonl.ng Variance ,Procedure (2)
Case # ~'7-/.. ? o
D.. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, et~.
E. Indl. cate North compass direction °"
~ ·
.F. Any additional Information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff
and applicable Sections of th~ Zoning Ordl. nance.
!11. Request for a Zoning Variance
.A. All.l'nformation below, a site plan, as described In Part II, and general
application must be provided before a hearing wlll be scheduled.
B. ODes the present use of. the property'conform to all use r_egjot~atlons for
the zone district In which It ls located? Yes ( ) No
If "no", specify each n~n-conformlng, use:
House is 19ca,ed i~ street easmen~
Ce
Do the existing structures comply with'all area helg~and bulk regulatlons
for the zone district In which l't Is.located? Yes (~J~) No' ( )
If "no", sp&clfy each non-conforming use:
De
Ee
Which unique physlcal characteristics of the subject property prevent Its
reasonable use for any of the uses.permitted in that zoning district?
( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography' ( ) So41
"( ) Too. small · ( ) Drainage. (
( ) ..Too shal!o.w ( ) Shape (
Old house ;imProperly located on the lot
) Sub-surface
) Other..: Specit~y:
Was the hardship d~scrlbed above'created by the action o~ anyone having
property, lqterests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted?
Yes ( ) No (:]CC) If yes, explaln:
F,
Was the hardship created by'any 'other man-made change, such as the reloca-
tion of a road? Yes ( ) No ( ) If yes, explain:Unknov.~; streets
,were installed abou~ 196~;possible vacation a~ C~at ~ime
G. Are the conditions of hardship for'which'you request a variance peculiar
only to.the property described In this petltlon? Yes'
If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? ~;e are. app~n~o~ly
for this property bu~ the homes across the: stree= may be az[eecee.
.
Wha~ Is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations
· that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using
maps, site plans with dlmenslqns and written exp~apation. At~ach addl~lQna~
"sheets, If necessarv.~ince the ~ev~ous vac~=zon .was no= recoroe~ ~
is no~ know i~ t~ previous vacation applies now, so ~e would like
I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property ~Vt~)
same zone, or to the enforcement of thls ordinance?
no
Certifica.teof Survey for
Carpenters Wheel
in Lots 1-6, Block 24, SETON
Hennepin County, Minnesota
29~'
I hereby certify.that this ts a true and correct representation of
a surve, y of the boundaries of Lots 1 2, 3, 4, 5, and the East 10
feet of. Lot 6, Block 24, SETON, the iocation of all existing build-
ings, if any, thereon, and the.proposed location of a proposed ad-
dition..It does not purport to show any other'improvements or encr-
oachments.
Scale:
Date :
1 inch = 40 feet
September 9. 1987,vehU67
COFFIN &.GRONOERG,
~lark S. Gronberg HN. LIc. No. 12755
'Gordon R. Coffin MN. Ltc. No. 6064
tN/
CASE NO. 87-671
TO: Planning Commission, ~pplicant and Sta~
FROH: Jan Bertrand, Bumld,ng Official
Planning Commission Agenda of October 12, 1987
CASE NO. 87.671
APPLICANT: Earl and Nila Erlander
LOCATION: 4354 Vilshlre Boulevard
LEGAL DESC.:
Lot 80, Phelps Island Park First Division, also land lying between
said Lot 80 and the shore of Black Lake; PID 19-117-23 13 0013
SUBJECT: Lakeshore setback variance
EXISTING ZONING: R-2 Single Family
PROPOSAL: The aPplicant is requesting a variance to allow the construction of
an 8 foot by 28 foot + above ground deck to the lakeshore within 30.feet of the
ordinary high water elevation of Lake Hinnetonka.
The property has had a garage added to the Structure since the survey was done
in ]971. There was a variance granted-under Res. No. 71-350. The property has
approximately 5200 square feet + of lot area.
The R-2 Zoning District requires a 6,000 square foot lot area, a 6 foot side yard
setback, a 20 foot front yard setback, and a 50 foot lakeshore setback to the ordi-
nary high water elevation for Lake Hinnetonka.
COHHENTS: The'tOpography of this lot is quite steep to the lakeshore and to afford
the owner some amount of yard space and easier maintenance for the building, the
applicant has requested this variance of 20 feet + to lakeshore. There is a 4 foot
walkway proposed to the above ground deck along the east property line. There is
also room however alg~'th~_.we~t_.p~operty llge.to..a~d an 8 foot de~k at the top of
'the hill aiong the west side of the structure.
RECOHHENDATION: As the structure was built previous to adoption of any flood plain
elevations and setbacks by the City, it is felt that the 38 foot setback on-the .......
structure is not objectionable to the area. However, both structures adjacent to
this building are set back in line and the proposed deck would protrude in front of
the average building line of the homes. There is also the possibility of adding
this deck along the west side of the property and still allow an 8 foot deck at
the top of the hill. Staff would recommend denial of any further encroachment
into the setback area adjacent to lakeshore.
The abutting neighbors have been notified.
This will be referred to the Clty Council on the October 27, 1987 Agenda.
A "/.s' ?
Plannln9 Commission Minutes
October 12, 1987
Case No. 87-671 Lakeshore setback variance for 4354 WilshireBoulevard
Lot 80, Phelps Island Park 1st Division, also land lying betweenLot 80
and the shore of Black Lake; PID % 19-117-23 13 0013
Applicants, Earl and Nila Erlander, were present.
The Building Official explained they are requesting to construct an 8 by
28 foot above ground deck within 30 feet of lakeshore. She revi~¢ed
some history found in the file on previously granted variances. In 1981,
Resolution 81-87, a former owner was granted a variance to enclose
what used to be a deck with the stipulation that no deck be added at
a future date. Apparently the north end of the ho~se was open then.
The structure w~s originally built before the adoption of the Flood
Plain Ordinance andwas built 38 feet + to lake.
Mr. Erlander stated they wish deck in order to maintain property; it is
a little frightening to get up and caulk, paint, etc. the lakefront side
of home; basicallywant to put deck on for access to windows. Mrs.
· Erlander questioned .not being told it was cut and dried and they could
have saved the $50~ Ene also commented neighbors have decks closer to 1-ake.
Weiland movedand Sohns seconded a motion to recoranend deniai of the
request.
The Commission explained that it certainly was an inconvenience not to'
have a deck in order to maintain their lakeshore windows; but that finan-
cial hardship was not part of criteria to grant a variance.
The vote on the motion to deny was unanimously in favor.of .the denial.
This will go to the City Council on the October 27, 1987 agenda.
CITY OF HOUND
PPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION
'(Please type the following information)
Case No. ,P7-~£ ?/
Fee Paid ~'o ~
Date Filed
2. Le. gal Oe~cript.lon, of Property: Lot ~0
Address
Day Phone
/~. Applicant '(if other than owner):
Name ~ Day Phone No.
Address ------'
5. Type of Request:
(~} Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit
( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review
( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D.
'%
( ) Amendment
( ) Sign Permlt
( )*Other'
*If other, specify:
'~, Present ~:onin9 District ' ' '~ Z
7. Existing Use(s) of Property ./L~,4 ! ~.4-r,'
.
8.' Has an appl,cation ever been made for zoning, vaflance, or conditional
.other zoning procedure for this property? ~ VF.$ If so, 11st date(s) of
list date(s) of application, action taken and provid~ Resolutlon No.(s) ~/~
use permit or
Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request.
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required
papers or plans to'be submitted herewlth are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in
or upon the premises described in this appllcatlon by any authorized official of the City
of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, o~ of posting, maintaining'and removing such
notices as may be,required by law.
"Signature of Applicant~~ Date ~-~-~"
Planning Commfsslon Recommendation: Denial of the request.
Date
Council Action:
Resolution No.
Date /0 '-~-7-,~'7
Request for Zoning Varlance Procedure
(2)
Case # ,r?- ?/
D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utillties, etc.
E. Indicate North compass direction
F. Any addltlonal information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff
and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
III. Request for a Zonln~ Variance
A. All.information below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general
application must be provided before a hearing wlll be scheduled.
B. Does the present use of the property conform to all use regulations for
the zone.district In which it Is located? Yes (/~) No ( ) ..
If "no", specify each non-conforming use=
Do the existing structures comply with ali area height and bulk regulations
.for the zone district in which it is located? Ye~ (~') No (
If "no'~, specify each non-conforming use:
D. Which unique physical characterlstlcs of the subject property prevent its
reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soi'l
( ) Too. small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface
( ). Too shallow. ( ) Shape . ( ) Other: Specl~y:
E. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anydne having
property interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted?
Yes ( ) No ()~) If yes, explain:
F. Was the hardship created by any'other man-made change, such as the reloca-
tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (~ If yes, explain:
G. Are. the conditions of hardship for'which you request a. variance peculia~
only to the property described in this petition? Yes .( ) No
If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?
H, ~hat is the 'minimum'~ mdific;tio~ (variance) from the area-bulk regulations
that will permit you to ~ke reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using
maps, site plans ~ith dimensions and written exp]anatlon. ~ttach additional
sheets, If necessary.) ~ ~~ ~o c~~oc~ 2
I ~ill granting o¢ the variance be mater~aliy detrimental to propefty
same zone, or' to the enforcement of this ordinance?
/do,
I
I
I
March 10, 1981
Councilmember Swenson moved the following resolution,
RESOLUTION NO. 81-87
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE
STREET FRONT & LOT SIZE VARIANCE
WHEREAS, owner of property described as Lot 80 Phelps Island Park 1st Division,
Plat 37930, Parcel 4915, PID 19-117-23 13 O015 and having a street
address of 4354 Wllshi're Blvd. is requesting variances to add on an
addition 12 x 24, and
WHEREAS, sai'd addition would be where the existing deck is now located and offer
more iiv|ng and dining area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND,
MINNESOTA:
That C0uncil does hereby concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and does hereby approve the 4.5 ft. ~treet front variance
and the 915.25 ft. lot size variance to allow the building of an addi-
tion where a deck is now located. Be it further stipulated that no deck
be added at a future date and o~ne~ obt~[~Pe~ts~ion fo~ S~[d ad~t~-
_f_r_om'the Minnehaha Creek W~tershed District.
A motion f~r the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council-:. -
'member'Ulrlck'and.upon.vOte being t~ken thereon; the following voted i'n favor
thereof; Charon, Lindlan, Polston, Swenson and Ulrick,'the following voted against
the same; none, whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed
by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
Attest: ~ty Clerk CMC
s/Leighton Lindlan
Mayor
RES0L~TION NO. 71-3~0
RESOLUTION CRAXT~C ~RONT YARD
(Lot 80, Phelps Ielan~ Park let Division)
:-~.. ;.'-.'.[~ 'W~V~8, the °Wne~ of Lot 80, Phelps Islan~ Park, let Divis/on has
'- ::.;:'.'*' requeste~ a front yar~ setback varianoe of 4~ feet in or,em
· ' · :: "": to oonstru~t a g~rage on his lot, and
[ ..:'.'. · ..
~!....:...,.'~.:..-* :.: ~ WHEREAs, the P~.anninE Commtesi6n has reoommende~ the variance to provide
,, , ....-..' for an attache~ two-car garage 22 fee~ in width and not more
;.:;'.,. :-~ . :.' . ·
':" :'" ""' ~0'~ ·
;: '.%'?...-..... . .
.'. .:-: .."-~- ..~ .. .
· . '. '.. ":....'. ·· · so the garage oan ~e. plaoed I feet from Count-/ Roa~ ~12~
::..:.... . .. .
5 ~ : ..': :.'-,:' ".. .' ' '
· .'..-.. ..- ...' .
the Oounotl this La, th da~ of :Deoe~e=, 1971.
KERR~°~
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NOTIFY JAMES A. RILEY
THAT THE CITY WILL EXERCISE ITS OPTION TO PURCHASE LAND
WHEREAS, the City of Mound has entered into option contract with
Mr. James A. Riley for the acquisition of Lot 12, lying east of the road, and
Lots 13, 14, and 15, Koelher's Addition to Mound, Lake Minnetonka, and
WHEREAS, the City held an election on September 29, 1987, and the
electorate has given the City authority to borrow money to acquire this land
and to develop a Public Utility Building, and
WHEREAS, the City in the option agreed to notify the seller by
November, 1987, if they have an interest in proceeding so that the seller
can make many necessary plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mound, as follows:
e
The City Manager is hereby authorized to write to James A.
Riley notifying him that the City will exercise its option
to purchase the aforedescribed property and thatthe date
the City shall take possession is April 1, 1988.
The Mayori City Manager, Finance DirectOr, City Attorney,
and other City staff are authorized to complete the
necessary work for the City to acquire said lands at the
option price of $172,000 plus the payment of all
outstanding special assessment coming due after the
closing and to prorate the 1988 taxes and assessments to
the date of a closing.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
75 YEARS
October 22, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY COUNCIL
CITY CLERK
REAPPOINTMENT OF PINKY CHARON TO THE MOUND HOUSING ANO
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Ms. Pinky Charon's term on the Mound Housing & Redevelopment Authority
expired on August 29, 1987. She has asked to be reappointed and the
HRA has recommended .approval. This is a 5 year term which would expire
on August 29, 1992.
fc
October 27, 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION TO REAPPOINT KAROL 'PINKY' CHARON
TO THE HOUND HOUSING & REDEVELOPIlENT AUTLIORITY FOR k
FIVE YEAR TERM - TO EXPIRE 8-29-92
BE IT RESOLVED, that. the City Council of the City of Mound, Min-
nesota, does hereby reappoint Karol "Pinky" Charon to the Mound.Housing &
Redevelopment Authority for a five year term, to expire August 29, 1992.
The foregoing ressolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
October 23, 1987
TO:
FROM: ·
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL dC
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER-' '
RE: DEVELOPERS PRESENTATION - LOST LAKE
Richard Bienapfl, President of Waterford Development Group, and
Nell Weber, Richard Schwartz of Schwartz/Weber will be present
Tuesday evening to make a formal presentation on the country inn
project they have proposed for the City's Lost Lake property.-.
The intent of the presentation is to give you a better picture of
what the developer is attempting to do with the project. I have
extended invitations to the Planning Commission and the Park
Commission to attend. 'Copies of the proposal are available to
anyone who wants them. Fran will bring copies along with her to
the meeting, should anybody request them there. Following the
presentation, I am sure there will be a number of questions.
Mark Koegler, City Planner, 'and myself have had two meetings with
Mr. Bienapfl and Mr. Weber. We have discussed various aspects of
the project, but there are still some questions that need to be
resolved, on a staff level, before further review can be carried
out. I would suggest that you allow the staff to further review
the .proposal and allow the staff ,to further address questions
that we have. Subsequent to that review, should the City Council
desire'to proceed, a letter of intent would be appreciated by the
Developer from the City, which would indicate that the City is
willing to pursue the project and will study further issues that
surround the project.
ES:is
THE INN AT LOST LAKE
A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
October 27, 1987
II.
III.
I. Development Team
A. Waterford Development Group, Inc.
B. Schwarz/Weber, Architects
C. Consultants & Other Team Members
Development Proposal
A. Architectural Concept
B. Architectural Program
C. Description of Improvement
Discussion of Issues
A. Market --
B. Environment ~
Lake Ac .cess .
D. Connection to Remainder of Community
E. Finance --
(Tlostlk)
3300 EDINBOROUGH WAY,, SUITE 406, EDINA, MN 55435, TELEPHONE 835-7075
BILLS OCTOBER 27, 1987
Batch 7101
Batch 7102
6q,699.57
.. 75,283LTq
139,983.31
~estonka Sewer & ~ater
Bristol
residence
750.00
TOTAL BILLS
lq.O,733.31
PArlE i
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLO
NO. INVOICE ~SR DATE DATE STATUS
PURCHASE
CITY DF {iDU~
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
dOURNAL
ACCOUNT NUII~ER
PPF-PAID
A~UNT
DATE
TIME
CHECK {"
AOO&O
ACRO-MN
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
19.42 OFFICE ~UPPLIES
19.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12,23 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES
10.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES
5.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
5.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
5.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
5.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES
251.47 PAPER-CARTRIDGES
5.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES
352.77 dRNL-CD
352.77
01-4040-2100
01-4090-2i00
0i-4140'2100
01-41~0-2100
01-4340-2100
01-4280-2100
71-7100-2100
73-7300-2100
78-7800-2100
01-40~-2100
01-40&0-2100
2O4O
AOIO0
AIR COM~ INC
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
68.28 NOV CONTRACT
20.45 NOV CO, FTRACT
9.45 NOV CONTRACT
4.68 t~V CONTRACT
24.30 NOV CONTRACT
4.69 NOV COntRACT
14.85 NOV CONTRACT
9.45 NOV CONrFp. ACT
14.85 NOV CONTRACT
171.00 dR)~.-CD
171.00
01-4280-3~50
01-4340-3950
01-41~0-3950
01-42~0-3~50
01-4140-3950
01-4040-3950
73-7300-3950
78-7800-~50
22-4170-3!!F'-J)
2040
BO510
10/22/87 10/22/87
541.32 METERS
541.32 dRNL-CD
73-7300-2300
2O40
BADGER {*ETER
VENDOR TOTAL 541.32
B0520
10/22/87 10/~/87
1,411.25 NOV LEASE
1,411.25 JRN'L-CD
20-5~)0-3920
2040
BALSA MI~4ESOTA )01000307 VENI)OR TOTAL 1411.25
B0540
10/22/87 10/22/87
76.,: OXYGEN
76,22 JRNL-CD
Ol-v;>O-;;Sv
2040
VEN£OR TOTAL
76.22
S0541
1~2.00 ~.:r~:R TIRE LOADER
142.00 JRNL-CD
U~-.~uO-~310
2040
VENDOR TOTAL
142.00
).--.50
10/22/87 I0/~/~7
2,94 PEN REFILLS
2.0:. SL?F'LiES
~o.oc. ...... F'~K REC SUPPLIES
41,83
01-4280-2100
0i-4060-21CZJ
01-4~40-~80
2040
STORE VD4DOR TOTAL
01-4320-3800
PAGE 2
AP-C02-OI
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY~M~$
DATE 10/2
TIME 11.1
INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
PRE-PAID CHE
ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK. t DA
10/22/87 10/22/87
256.92 JRNL-CD
2O4O
CHEMLAWN CARPET CLEAN VENDOR TOTAL 256.92
coqgo
10/22/87 10/22/87
907.00
505.00
303.64
5,946.50
7,662.14
EOUIP LEASE
HI)WE MAINT
UBIRAINING
UB SOFTWARE
dFN.-CD
01-4095-5000
01-4095-3800
01-4095-4110
01-4095-5000
2O40
COMPUTOSERVICE INC
VENDOR TOTAL 7662.14
C1079
10/22/87 10/22/87
51.04
319.21
3.02
107.78
53.89
53.89
209.12
61.54
138.79
998.28
OCT TELEPHONE
OCT TELEPHONE
OCT TELEPHONE
OCT TELEPHD~
OCT TELEPHONE
OCT TELEPHONE
OCT TEL.EPHD~
[]CT T~_ ~HONE
OCT TELEPHONE
dRNLoCD
01-4095-3220
01-4320-3220
01-4190-3220
01-4280-3220
73-7300-3220
78-7800-3220
01-4140-3':J~
22-4170-3220
71-7100-3220
2O40
CDNTIN~J~AL TEI. EPHDNE VENDOR TOTAL
998.28
01170
10/22/87 10/22/87
459.75
153.25
613.00
RR LEASE TO 11/15
RRLEASE TO 11/15
,JRNL-CO
40'~00-3910
01-4320-3910
2O4O
DAKOTA RAIL INC
VENDOR TOTAL 613.00
Dl189
10/22/87 10/22/87
40.00 MAY INSPECTIONS
40.00 JRNL-CD
01-3251-0000
2O4O
DAVID P FISCHER
D1230
VENDOR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
40.00
25.52 HUD-MILEAGE
3.25 HUD-MTO
28.77 JF~.-CD
01-4~0-3340
01-4090-412~
2O4O
VENDOR TOTAL
28.77
D1290
10/22/~7 10/..~; o7
be.no ~n CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS-CB9
6,30?.60 ~NL-CD
40-6000-2.2~
2~0
VEND&~ TOTAL 6309.60
10./22/,'E.-;7 10/22/87
;~-7800-23CK,
E'.J: ?::E;: :,.',;Y'.~:ETE VEI~;DOR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
E'J2?:: :-::~DK & ASSOC VEND3R TOTAL
42,00
42.00
42.00
TA!:K ...... D'
JRNL-CD
73-7300-3100
2040
PAGE 3
AP-C02-OI
~DOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE ~R DATE DATE STATUS
PURCHASE
CITY OF HOB'iD
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
JOURNAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
DATE
TIItE
F1660
FLOYD SECURITY
81831"
G~ERAL R~AIR SE~ICE
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENI)DR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP VENDOR TOTAL
H2100
10/22/87 10/22/87
HE)tN CO CHIEF OF POLICE-PT VENDOR TOTAL
H2140
10/22/87 10/~/87
HENN CO SH~IFFS DF. PT VENDOR TOTAL
I2'389
10/~/87 10/22/87
INSTRU~NTATIDN SERVICES I VENDOR TOTAL
J2440
d B DISTRIBUTING
10/22/87 10/22/87
VE)~OR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/L-';7
VEI-~DGR TOTAL
!.C~.--_'- C=E' :CAL
VENDOR TOTAL
10/22/87 i0/22/87
VEND[8 TOTAL
411,00 SEMI ANI, FUAL ALARM
411.00 ,~mNI_-CD
411.00
343.51 SEAL-SLEEVE
343.51 JF~L-CD
343.51
58.55 REPAIR TANKER
50.00 REPAIR I)URP TRUCK
50.00 REPAIR [~JMP TRUCK
5.80 ROD
164.35 ,JR~.-CD
164.35
195.00 COURSE FEE-HARRKIL
195.00 JRNL-CD
195.00
160.46 SEPT BOOKINGS
160,46 ,JR~L-CO
160,46
104.85 REPAIR RADIO
104.~ JRNL-CB
104.85
111.24 CLEANERS
111.24 JR)~.-CD
!11.24
i0.0~ SEHINAR
10,04 JRNL-CD
10,04
6S,20 MILEAGE
o~ ~ GrU~ ~TG
~ ~ COMPUTER ~TG
220.76 JRI.~L-CD
220.7~,
..... .-. HY~ ..... L~,, ACID
150.72
150.92
71-7100-3980
78-7800-2300
2O40
78-7800-2300
73-7300-23(X)
01-4340-2300
01-4280-2300
2040
01-4140-4110
2O40
01.4110-4350
2O40
01-4140-3820
01-42~0-2200
2040
0!-4190-4120
2040
0!-4090-3340
01-4070-4110
01-4095-4110
2040
73-7300-2260
2O4O
PAgE 4
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE NMBR
K2709
INVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE DATE STATUS
10/22/87 I0/22/87
PURCHASE
CITY OF
AMI]LINT[ESCRIPTION
179.00 EMULSION
179.00 ~NL-CI)
JOURNAL
.~r_.OUNT ~
01-4280-2340
2O40
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
DAlE 10/£
TIME II.1
CHE
CH£CK Il DA
KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL
17%00
L2850
10/22/87 10/22/87
562.10 4TH QTR INSURANCE
60.77 4TH QTR INSURANCE
562.10 4TH QTR INSURANCE
7'5.96 4TH QTR INSURA, NCE
4,017.13 4TH QTR INSURANCE
562.10 4TH Qll~ INSLRANCE
30.3 4TH QTR INSLS~qNCE
3,266.31 4TH QTR INSURANCE
303.84 4TH QTR INSURANCE
121.54 4TH QTR INSURANCE
835.57 4114 I]TR INSURANCE
3,190.38 4TH QTR INSURANCE
1,124.22 4TH QTR INSURA~tCE
2,316.80 4TH I]TRINSURANCE
2,316.80 4TH I]TRINSURANCE
19,346.00 dRNL-CD
01-4040-3610
01-4070-3610
01-40~-3610
01-4110-36 I0
01-4140-3610
01-4190-3610
01-41S0-3610
01-4280-3610
01-4290-3610
01-4320-3610
01-4340-3610
22-4170-3610
71-7100-3610
73-7300-3610
78-7800-3610
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS T* VENDOR TOTAL
L2851
10/22/87 10/22/87
19346.00
56.50 4TH QTR W/C INS
62.50 41H OTR W/C INS
4j69.oo 4TH W/C INS
2,427.S0 4TH ~ W/C Im
1,6~00 4TH ~TR W/C I~
~2.2S 4~ ~TR W/C I~
62(.~ 4TH ~TR W/C I~
1,069.25 4TH Q~ W/C INS
~5.75 4TH O~ W/C INS
11,~7.00 J~L-~
01-4040-3600
O1
01-4140-3600
01-41~0-3600
01-4280-3600
0i-42~0-36(X)
22-4170-3600
71-7100-3600
73-7300-3600
78-7800-3600
01-4340-3600
2'O40
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS T* VENI)~ TOTAL
L2880
10/22/87 10,/22/87
11307.00
97.50 ROTARY DLES
97.50 JRNL-CD
0!-4140-4120
2O4O
LEONARD H~RRELL
L2721
TOTAL
10/22/87 10,/22/87
97.50
8?5.00 iNSP-PLAN REVIEW
8~5.00 JRNL-CD
01-3251-0000
2O40
VE~DC~ TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
8?5.00
180.30 ALTERNATOR
445.95 PARTS
6~6.~v JRNL-CD
01-4140-3810
01-4290-2310
2040
LF_)!.j?..?' c~'
"iZ' 'r
VENDOR TOTAL
626.25
21.07 H~SE
~.-4170-~00
PASE 5
AP-C02-O1
NO. INVOICE ~BR DATE DATE STATUS
PURCHASE
CITY OF ~tOUND
A~9OL~T [ESCRIPTION
JOURNAL
DATE 1".
CHECK #
MACK TRUCK
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
21,07 dFt~4L-CD
21.07
20,i0
M~IO
MARINA AUTO SUPPLY
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
236.03 SEPT PARTS
11.59 SEPT PARTS
3.00 SEPT PARTS
41.00 SEPT PARTS
291.62 JRNL-CD
291.62
01-4290-2310
01-4280-2300
73=7300-Z'JO0
22-4170-2200
2040
1'~40
MASYS CORPORATION
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
120.00 NOVSUPPORT-POLICE
120.00 JRNL-CD
120.00
01-4095-3800
2O4O
M3080
MCCO~SS-KNUTSON
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
1,302.00 SEPT ~OR SERVICES
529,00 SEPT-DRAIN LINE
126.00 SEPT-CO 15 LIGHTS
2,067.11 SEPT-PW BLDG
243,00 SEPT ~A
54.00 SEPT CO 15
54.00 SEPT-FO PAF~(ING
54.00 SEPT-87 SEALCOAT
81.00 SEPT BURTON ESORDW
63.00 SEPT-B 'ALBDA ESCROW
54.00 SEPT-COMi'ERC SO ESCRDW
27.00 SEPT-LOST LA~ ES~DW
666.00 SEPT-78 STREETS
27.00 SEPT-STREET PLANS
243.00 SEPT-PLANS-ASSESS,STRIPING
5,590.11 JRll.-CD
5590.11
01-4190-3100
73-7300-3100
67-6000-3100
20-5200-3100
26-5700-3100
66-6000-3100
27-5800-3100
27-5800-3100
01-2r300-0967
01-2300-0948
01-2300-0928
01-2300-0901
55-6000-3100
01-4140-3100
40-6000-3100
2O40
M~50
10/~/87 10/22/87
664,94 SEPT GAS
.47 SEPT GAS
A~ ~l JRNL-CD
01-4320-3720
22-4170-37~
2(;40
TOTAL
10/~/87 10/22/87
81.!5
130.95
212.10
HIP BOOTS
.... CD
73-7300-2200
22-4170-2270
2040
~;~,~:,,.~.-~ ..... -f ,:tP;._. c°. SA:ETY VEtJDDR TOTAL 212.I0
80.00
80.00 oR,'~L-uD
01-4090-4110
2~40
....... =,, OF CPA'S
VENDOR TOTAL
80.00
01-4280-3710
40-6000-3710
73-7300-3710
PAOE 6
AP-C02-01
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF MOUND
DATE lO/l
TIME ll.J
VENDOR INVOICE [rdE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DE~RIPTIDN
PRE-PAID CHi
ACCOUNT NUMBER AK, DUNT CH£CK #
10/22/87 10/22/87 4,677.70 JRNL-CO
NDRT~RN STATES POWER CD VENDOR TOTAL 4677.70
10/22/87 10/22/87
54.00 WINDSHIELD WASHEB
54.00 JRNL-CO
01-4290-2250
2040
PEkt4S~LVAJ4IA OIL CO
VENDOR TOTAL 54,00
P4050
10/22/87 10/22/87
535.00 OCT JANITORIAL 9ERV
535.00 R-CO
01-43~-4210
2040
PNS SERVICE CORP
VENDOR TOTAL 535.00
P4110
10/22/87 10/-)9/87
569.25
74.75
644.00
STRIPING CBD
STRIPING CITY HALL
JRNL-CD
40-6000-2360
01-4320-4200
20~
PRECISION STRIPING
VENDOR TOTAL
644.00
R4220
10~2/87 10/22/87
244.00 FREIGHT
244.00 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9600
2040
P, BKS CORPORATION/NELSON D~ VENDOR TOTAL 244.00
S43&0
10/22/87 10/22/87
1,110.00 SENIOR ' COUNSELING
1,110.00 JRNL-CD
16-~-3100
· 2040
SENIOR COM,%~4ITY SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL 1110.00
S4-430
10/22/87 10/22/87
552.90
417J15
970.05
RECYCLE FLYERS
PW BR~H~E
JR.-CD
01-4270-2120
~-5200-3S00
2040
S~ F~INTING
VENI)OR TOTAL 970.05
84431
10/22/87 10/22/87
43.05 REPAIR VACLrdM
43.05
71-7100-3820
2~0
SDS VACUL~ CLEANER SENVICE VENDOR TOTAL
S44~9
~v/~lo7 10,.~,~7
43.05
-'m.'.O0 DRACKETS
25'~ JRNL'CD'
22--4!70--~
2040
54~00
25.00
~..~., EAR PLUOS
51.45 ........
73-7300-2200
. VENDOR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
5!.45
1,561,10 TiEES
53b.75 TI~£S
137.50 TIEES
~,~.~, JRNL-CD
01-4280-2310 ·
01-4140-3810
01-4340-2310
2040
PAGE 7
AP-C02-O!
VENDOR INVOICE ))UE HOLD
NO, INVOICE N~R ))ATE rlATE STATUS
SUBURBAN TIRE
VEhq}OR TOTAL
PURCHASE
CIT)~ DF HOUND
&~DUk5 DESCRIPTION
2235,46
JOURNAL
A~COUNT NUMBER
PRE'PAID
AJ'iOL~4T
DATE lC
TIN II.
CHECK
S4630
10/~/87 10/2.2/87
11.40 SEPT GASOLINE
54.74 SEPT GASOLINE
13.02 OIL
28.78 SEPT GASOLINE
76.69 SEPT GASOLINE
8.75 SEPT GASOLINE
2.68 SEPT GASOLINE
526.94 SEPT GASOLINE
7~.00 ,JR~-CI)
01-4190-210
01-4280-2210
01-4290-2250
01-4~0-2210
73-7300-2210
01-4040-2210
22-4170-2210
01-4140-2210
2O4O
SL~:'ERAMERICA
VEND~ TOTAL
7~.00
S4641
10/22/87 10/22/87
680.00 WYE-GEAR CASE
680.00 dRNL-CD
22-4170-3820
SUTPHEN CORP
VENDOR TOTAL
680.00
T4730
10/22/87 10/22/87
45.40 EXTERIOR STOOGE NOTICE
9.~ TONK~ STAR HEARING
87.06 F~DPDSED ASSESS;'IENTS
156.00 RECYCLE INSERTS
56.78 PROPOSED CBD AS~SSMENTS
148.80 PW BLDG ))ISPLAY
244.80 LABOR DAY-FOOTBALL ADS
442.8S PW ELECTIDN NDTICES
1,190.77 ,JRNL-C9
01-4190-3510
01-4090-3510
01-4020-3510
01-~270-3510
40-6000-3510
20-52O0-C-600
71-7100-3510
01-4060-510
2O40
THE LAKER
VEND~ TOTAL 1190.77
T4790
10/22/87 10/22/87
364.10 BOOSTER-SUPPORT
18.28 FILTER-SENDER
382.38 JRNL-CD
01-4290-2310
22-4170-2200
2O40
TI-R]~ BRC)5 CHEVROLET
VENDOR TOTAL
382.38
T4810
10/22/87 10/22/87
48.00 PENTA PRESS
48.00 JR)~-CD
01-4280-2310
2O40
T~ ~::nW~,LL L~,~,:~,,A, I,,G VENDOR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
272.01 META~ HASTER'HDSE
272.01 JRNL-CD
78-7800-2300
~40
TOLL C~PANY
TOTAL 272,0!
01-4095-2100
2040
10/22/87 10/22/~7
17.00
100.00
II~.00
SUBSCRIPTION
F'FD SUBSCRIPTION
JR¢C-CD
01-4090-4170
01-12~-0000
2(NO
PAEE 8
AP-C02-01
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
WALL STREET JOURNAL VEI~OR TOTAL
I0/22/87 10/22/87
WATER PRODUCTS CO~ANY VENDOR TOTAL
W5530
WIDME~ INC
X5-/50
XEROX CO~ORATION
Z5870
ZIEGLER INC
10/22/87 10/22/87
VB~E~OR TOTAl.
10/22/87 10/22/87
VENDOR TOTAL
10/22/87 10/22/87
V~DOR TOTAL
TOTAL ALL VENDORS
PURCHASE
CITY OF MOUND
AMOUNT ~ESCRIPTION
119.00
28.94 ~YS
28,94 JRNL-CD
2~0.00 ~ANDVIEW
2&O.O0 dBl.-CD
2&O.O0
48.~5 FILTHS
48.~$ d~NL-CD
48.~
75,289.74
JOURNAL
AC~3OUNT NUMBER
73-7300-2300
2O40
78-7800-3800
204O
01-4320-3800
2O40
01-4280-2310
PRE-PAIl)
AMOL~i'
DATE
TI~ 11.
CHE
CHECK #
PAGE I
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. It~/OICE NMI)R BATE BATE STATU~
AO030 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
A-1 HII~ETO~{A RENTAL VF.2,9)OR TOTAL
PURCHASE
CITY OF MOUND
650.00
DESCRIPTION
TABLES-CHAIRS
JRNL-CD
6SO,O0
JOURNAL
PRE-PAIl)
O1
1010 6,50.00 27665 I
A0149 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
AL & ALMA'S SUPPER CLUB VENDOR TOTAL
133.65
48.b0
182.25
182.25
P & Z DIIkS~F~
P & Z DINNER
dRNL-CD
01-4190-4100
01-2300-000O
1010
182.25 27677 1(
B0549 PRE-PAID
· . 10/16/87 10/16/87
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
BELLBOY CORPORATION
TOTAL
884.40
884.40
1,996.41
1,996.41
2880.81
LIQ
dRNL-CD
LIO
JRNL-CD
71-7100-9510
1010
71-7100-9510
1010
884.40 27652 1(
1996.41 27673 1(
C0889 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
CHUCK TWEDT SEMINARS VENDOR TOTAL
52.50
17.50
17.50
35.00
17.50
17.50
17.50
175.00
175.00
SEiilNAR
SEMINAR
9EHINAR
SEMINAR
SEMINAR
SEHINAR
SEMINAR
JRN.'CD
01-4090:4120
01-4040-4120
01-4190-4120
01-4140-4120
73-7300-4110
78-7800-4120
71-710o-4i20
1010
175,00 27637
C~99 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
COMMERCIAL LIFE INS CD VE)E~R TOTAL
D1219 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
3.60
1.80
3.60
6.30
13.50
3.60
.90
7.20
5.40
.90
46.80
46.80
131.75
8.80
140.55
(]CT LIFE
OCT LIFE
OCT LIFE
OCT LIFE
OCT LIFE
(]CT LIFE
OCT LIFE
OCT LIFE
OCT LIFE
OCT LIFE
~NC-CD
CONTRACT
HILEAGET
JF~,E.-CD
INS
INS
INS
INS
INS
INS
INS
INS
INS
INS
73-7300-1520
78-7800-1520
71-7100-1520
01-4280-1520
01-4140-1520
01-4190-1520
01-42~0-1520
01-4090-1520
01-4040-1520
01-4340-1520
1010
01-4350-3100
01-4350-3340
1010
4~.80 27662
140.55 27650
DELBERT RUBOLPH
VENDOR TOTAL
140.55
DI.~O PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
B~AI,.I) BRYCE VENDOR TOTAL
E1429 PRE-PAID
350.00
350.00
350.00
613.31
ADVANCE-CHIEFS MTG
JRNL-CD
LIQ
22-4!70-4110
1010 ·
71-7100-9510
350.00 27645
PAJgE 2
AP-C02-OI
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF HDI~tl)
~ATE 10/
TINE IS.
VENDOR INVOI~ DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE ~ DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNI ~SCRIPTION
PRE-PAID CH
ACCOUNT NIJMBER A,~UNT ~CK # D
10/16/87 10/16/87
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
323.35 WINE
15.48- DISC
921.18 dRIlL-CD
435.60 WINE
4.35- DISC
431.25 dRNL-CD
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
921.18 27M3 10/
431.~ 27653 lOi
nE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
569.94 LIQ
119.~8 WINE
12.99- DISC
676.83 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-956O
1010
676.83 27670 lOy
El) PHILLIPS & SONS
~ENDDR TOTAL 2029.26
G!971
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
1~.70 OCT HOSP PREM
158.70 JRNL-CD
01-4140-1510
1010
158.70 27632 10~
GROUP HEALTH PLAN
UE~$OR TOTAL
158.70
G1772
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87.
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
895.38 LIO
;'07,35 WINE
22.06- DISC
10.12 FRT
1,090.79 JRNL-CD
6O0.55 WINE
12.21- DISC
1.80 FRT
590.14 JRNL-CD
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
71-7100-9600
1010
71-7100-~520
71-7100-9560
71-7100-9600
1010
1090.79 'I I0,
590.14 27667 10
GRIGGS CODFt-R & COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 1680.93
H2150
PRE-PAID 22,787.74
98.62
10/16/87 10/16/87 22,886.36
PRE-PAID 21.00
10/16/87 10/16/87 21.00
2ND 1/2 PROP TAX
2ND 1/2 PROP TAX
dRNL-CD
EASEMENT 251172421013
JRNL-CD
01-4320-5310
40-6O00-5310
1010
01-4320-4100
1010
22886.36 27674 10
21.00 27654
H~N CO TREASLKrER
~rJ'4DOR TOTAL 22907.36
H2251
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
57.00 ROOM GUARANTEE
57.00 JRNL-CD
01-4040-4110
1010
57.00 27666 1(
HOTEL MARITIME
VENDOR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
69.40 ICMA SHUK1.E IO/3PR
69.40 JR~-CD
01-4040-1400
I010
69.40 276~ 1(
ICMA RETIREMENT CDRP
VENDOR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
INSTRUY~;TATION SERVICES I VENDOR TOTAL
69,40
2S.O0
25,00
25.00
REGISTRATION-SKINNER
JRNL-CD
78-7800-4110
1010
~,00 276~ 1,
PAGE 3
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. I)~.)DICE )~IBR DATE DATE BTATUB
PURCHASE
CITY OF I'IOUND
AMOL~4T DESCRIPTION
JOURNAL
AC_COUNT NLrdBER
DATE
TIME
Pfl~-PAID
AHDUNT CHE~ #
J2S71 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
JOHN TAFFE VENDOR TOTAL
J26-79 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
JOHNSON BRDS ~HOLESALE LI* VENDOR TOTAL
M3090 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
tED CENTER HEALTH PLAN VEYlDDR TOTAL
H3170 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
ME1T<D WASTE CONTROL CDHMI* VEI~DDR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
~ DTED VENDOR TOTAL
M3500 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
MDU[~ FIRE RELIEt: ASSN VEND~ TOTAL
M3631 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
MLFFUAL ~EHEFIT LIFE VEND~ TOTAL
162.00 CONI~T
234.00 CONTRACT
72.00 COt~RACT
12.00 CONTRACT
480.00 ~'NL-CD
480.00
1,185.98 LID
1,331.33 WINE
37.04- DISC
2,450.27 ~NL-CD
1,242.26 LID
~9.25 WINE
31.89- DISC
1,$79.62 JNL-CD
4~9.87
334.40 OCT HDSP ~REM
167.20 OCT HOSP PR~
73.35 OCT HDSP PREM
574.95 JRNL-CD
574.95
2,598.75 SEPT SAC
2,598.75 JRNL-CD
2598.75
20.00 WDFU(SHOP-S~Ji~E
20.00 JRNL-CD
20,00
4,026.25 OCT FIRE RELI~ PENSI~t
4,026.25 dRNL-CD
· 4026.25
177,73 OCT LTD
88.63 OCT Lll}
40,43 OCT LTl)
72.84- OCT LTD
16,44 OCT LTD
54.73 OCT LTD
16.44 OCT LTD
29.85 OCT LTD
34.72 OCT LTl)
48.96 OCT LTD
4~.09 JF~4L-CD
435.09
01-4~0-3100
16-5898-3100
01-4060-3100
80-8000-3100
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-~60
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
01-4040-1510
01-4340-1510
01-4140-1510
I010'
78-2304-0000
1010
01-4040-4110
I010
95-9500-14~
1010
01-4140-1520
01-4280-1520
01-4040-1520
01-41~0-1520
01-4340-1520
01-4090-1520
0i-4290-1520
71-7100-1520
73-7300-1520
78-7800-1520
I010
480,00 27649 1(
2480.27 2764.2
1879.62 27669
574.95 27633
2598.75 27663 1(
20.00 27676 1(
4026,25 276~9 1(
435.09 27638 1(
PAGE 4
AP-C02-O1
VEh~OR INVOICE OUE HOLD
NO, INVOICE )~BR DATE BATE STATUS
PURCHASE
CITY O~ HOL~D
A~OUNT ~SCRIPTI[~N
JOURNAL
ACCOL~ NO,ER
P~E-PAID
AHOUNT
DATE 10/~
TIME 15.~
C~
CHECK #
P3950 PRE-PAID .
PERA
10/16/87 10/16/87
VS'~OR TOTAL
P4000 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
PEPSI COLA/7UP BOTTLING VENDOR TOTAL
P4030 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
PHYSICIANS OF MN VENDOR TOTAL
P4111 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
PROFESSIONAL EEO CONSULTAN VENDO~ TOTAL
P4112 ' PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
PROVIDENTIAL LIFE INS CO VENDOR TOTAL
Q4171 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
OUALITY WI~E ~ SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL
R4259 PRE-PAID
104.09 PERA IO/3PR
151.46 PERA IO/3PR
84.10 PERA IO/3PR
324.39 PERA IO/3PR
84.73 PERA IO/3PR
1,676.03 PERA IO/SPR
~.06 PERA IO/3PR
63.32 PERA IO/3PR
143.58 PERA IO/3PR
4~.87 PE~A IO/3PR
2,722.~ JRNI,.-CD
2722.63
71.55 POP FOR DANCE
71.55 JRNL-CD
71.55
423.8~ OCT HOSP PREM
528.41 OCT HOSP PP£H
376.76 OCT HOSP PREM
1,036.08 OCT HOSP PREM
376.76 OCT HOSP PREM
.2,054.83 OCT HOSP P~:~
188.38 OCT HOSP PREM
~.86 OCT HO~ PREM
188.38 OCT HOSP P~H
5,759.32 ~-CD
5759.32
75.00 CONF FEE-SHLIKLE
75.00 JRIt-CD
75.00
689,70 PPD HDSP-N SCHEP~IAU
689.70 ~NL-CD
689.70
408.44 WINE
4.09- DISC
404.35 ~t.L-CD
1,024.28 LIO
306.50 WINE
23.77- DISC
1,317,01 ~NL-CD
1721.36
55.25 CONTRACT
98.09 OCT HOSP
73-7300-1440
78-7800-1440
71-7100-1440
01-4280-1440
01-4190-1440
01-4140-1440
01-4290-1440
0t-4040-1440
Ot-40~O-t440
01-4340-1440
1010
01-2300-0220
1010
73-7300-1510
78-7800-1510
71-7100-1510
01-4280-1510
01-4190-1510
01-4140-1510
01-4290-I510
01-4090-1510
01-4040-1510
1010
01-4040-4110
1010
71-1285-0000
1010
71-7100-9520
71-7100-95~0
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-95~0
1010
01-4060-3100
01-4340-1510
2722,63
71.55
5759.32
75.00
689.70
404.35
1317.01
27~5~ lot
27640 10,
27634
27~39 lC
27647
PA~ 5
AP-C02-O1
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF MOUND
DATE
TIME 15.,
VE)~OR
NO. INVOICE NMBR
ROBERT E JO~S~
I)~v'DICE ~JE HOLD
DATE DATE STATUS ~MOUNT
10/16/87 10/16/87 153.34
vE~DR TOTAL 153.34
[ESCRIPTIB4
JRNL-CD
A~OUltT NUMBB
1010
AMOUr41
153.34
C~
27651 lOt'
R4~$0
RONALD 'MARSCHt~
PRE-PAID 350.00
10/16/87 10/16/~7 3SO.O0
MENDO~ TOTAL 350.00
ADVANCE-CHIEFS MTG
J~NL-CO
22-4170-4110
lOlO
S4&59
SEARS ROEBUCK & CO
S4370
.HAR.'
PRE-PAID 104.98
10/16/87 10/16/87 104.98
VEhtDDR TOTAL 104.98
PRE-PAID 227,85
10/16/87 10/16/87 227.85
VENDOR TOTAL 22%$5
WRENCH-IMPACT GUN
dR~-CO
HOSP-KRAUSE-11,12,1/88
JRNL-CD
22-4170-~20
1010
01-4280-1510
1010
104.98
227.85
27636 1(
27648 1(
S4390
SHDR~INE PLAZA
PRE-PAID 1,993.74 OCT RENT
I0/16/~7 10/16/87 1,?~3.74 JR~_-CD
VENDOR TOTAL 1993.74
71-7100-3920
I010
1993.74
27635
S4500
PRE-PAID 175.11
254.80
141.49
32~.30
142,56
74,12
~3.28
241.54
90.71
78.86
14,11
5.80
8.97
10/16/87 10/16/87 1,787.6,5
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FICA IO/3PR
FiCA IO/3PR
FICA MED IO/3PR
FICA ME~ IO/3PR
FICA HED IO/3PR
JRNL-CO
73-7300-1440
78-7800-1440
71-7100-1440
01-4280-1440
01-41~0-1440
01-4~0-1440
01-4040-1440
01-4090-1440
01-4140-1440
01-4340-1440
01-4140-1440
01-4340-14~0
71-7100-1440
1010
1787.65
27&~7 i~
STATE BA)~K DF MD'J4D
VENDOR TOTAL 1787.65
S4550
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
),574.44 3RD QTR SURCHARGE
1,574.44 JRNL-CO
01-2222-0000
1010
1574.44
276~.
STATE TREASURER
VEN[SR TOTAL 1574.44
S4570 PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
100.20 SYLVANIA LA?~
100.20 ~)~_-CD
01-4320-2200
1010
100.20
27655
STERLING ELECTRIC CO VENDOR TOTAL
100.20
S4630 PRE-PAID
12.31 AUG GASOLINE
10.26 AUG GASOLINE
108.70 AUG GASOLI)E
87.58 AUG GASOLINE
645.27 AUG GASOLINE
01-4190-2210
01-4270-2210
01-4280-2210
73-7300-2210
01-4140-2210
PAGE
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE ~tBR
SUF'ERAM~ICA
T4927
PURCHASE
CITY DF MDUHD
10/16/87 10/16/87
TRAVELERS INSURANCE CD VENDOR TOTAL
U5100 PRE-PAID
INVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE DAlE STATUS AHOL~T
10/16/87 10/16/87 864.12
VE)~DR TOTAL 864.12
PRE-PAID 57.93
63.79
262.36
22,00
149.50
44.00
49.50
63.43
86.43
820.94
10/16/87 10/i6/87
U~ITDG RENTAL SYSTEM VB~DR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
10/16/87 10/16/87
~URST-PEARSON-LARSON VEI'4DDR TOTAL
TOTAL ALL VENDORS
820.94
42,46
16.80
105.00
21.00
10,40
31.50
52.50
5.10
284,76
284.76
1,550,00
1,550,00
1550.00
DESCRIPTION
,JR.-CD
(]CT DENTAL PREM
OCT DENIAL PREM
OCT DENTAL PREM
OCT DENTAL PREM
OCT DENTAL PREll
OCT DENTAL PREM
OCT DENTAL PREM
OCT DENTAL PREH
OCT DENTAL PREM
(3CT DENTAL PREH
JRNL-CD
SEPT TO~LS
SEPT RUGSLS
SEPT UNIFOF~
SEPT UNIFORMS
SEPT UNIFORMS
SEPT UNIFORMS
SEPT UNIFORMS
SEPT RAGS
JRNL-CD
OCT RETAINER
JRNL-CD
64,699.57
JOURNAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
1010
01-4040-1510
01-4090-1510
01-4140-1510
01-4290-1510
01-4280-1510
0i-4340-1510
01-4190-15i0
73-7300-1510
78-7800-1510
71-7100-1510
1010
01-4290-2250
01-4280-2200
01-42~-2.240
01-4290-2240
01-4340-2240
73-7300-2240
78-7800-2240
22-4170-22~
1010
01-4110-3100
1010
PRE-PAID
AMDU[f[
864.12
820.94
284.76
1550.00
DATE 10/~
TIME 15.~
C{-ECK # 9~
. 2 10/
27661 10~
27671 10
27660 1(
\o\
CITY OF MOUND
Hound, H~nnesota
PUBL!C DANCE PERMIT APPLICATION
.~'ame of Owner of Business
,
S~ree~ City State
Phone q72 - i -¢ff Date of Birth
Does anYone other-than above have financial interest in the'business?
Dates o'f Single Dances
16). If Annual Dance Permit, from when to when:
Annuat Dance" $200.00
: (Ord' 3~7) ,.
Iqa loween
~'rlf the answer to Item 3 is "Yes":, please list others havi
The Mound Westonka Choir and
Our Lady of the Lake Youth Group
will hold a HalIoween Dance for all
high school students grades 9-I2
.. ~day, Oct. 30, from ~-1I p.m. ntOur
~ Lady of the Lake School social hall.
: . There will be D] music provided
' by the ~Mound Westonka Choir.
Refreshments will be available.
; Tickets will be sold for $3 at thc hi~d~
.. school and will be available a~
door for $4. Proceeds will ~o to the
CITY OF HOUND
1987 BUDGET REPORT
EXPENDITURES
SEPTEMBER' 1987
SEPTEMBER
BUDGET EXPENSE
YTD
EXPENSE
75 J of
UNEN-
CUMBERED
EXPENSE
Yea r
PER CENT
EXPENDED
GENERAL FUND
Council
City'Manager/Clerk
Elections
Assessing
Finance ...
Legal
Cable TV
Recycling
Police
Civil Defense
Planning/Inspectior
Streets
Shop & Store
City Property
Parks
Commons. Docks
Hound City Dpys
Contingencies
Transfers
Computer
$50,460 3,475
111,430 7,772
500. 1,914
46,170 40,803
134,010 9,314
83,750 5,333
6,490 22
18,32o 1,o83
626,130 39,746
2,300 33
104,600 8,235
390,730 25,872
50,810 4,409
85,320 3,071
144,760 6,342
54,100 366
3,500 ---
17,140 180
143,200 9,767,
5,5!8
41,364 9,096 82.0
78,996 32,434 70.9
2,657 (2,157) N/A
46,159 11 100.0
95,006 39,004 70.9
49,282 34,468 58.8
5,642 848 86.9
11,735 6,585 64.1
423,474 ~02,656 67.6
482 1,818 21.0
82,441 22,159 78.8
259,229 131,501- 66.3
37,561 13,249 73.9
49,077 36,243 57.5
109,284 35,476 75.5
42,199 11,901 78.0
3,485 15 99.6
1,584 15,556 9.2
87,900 55,300 61.38
39,739 .(39,739) . --
GENERAL FUND TOTAL j2,o7),72o
173,255
1,467,296 606,424
70.8
Area Fi re
Service Fund
$223,940
7,184
Liquor Fund 149,340 11,036
Water Fund' 296,910 36,797
Sewer Fund 693,150 103,497
167,391 56,549
108,067 39,173
215,874 81,036
493,819 199,331
74.8
73.4
72.7
71..2
CITY OF HOUND
1987 BUDGET REPORT
SEPTEMBER 1987
75
~; of Year
BUDGET
~nt~mh~r
REVENUE
YTD
REVENUE
VARIANCE
PER CENT
RECEIVED
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Business. Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
General Gov't
Charges.
Court Fines
Charges to Other
Departments
Other Revenue
$975,893
771,o57
13,000
108,100'
33,3OO
94,000
20,870
57,500
TOTAL REVENUE
$2,073,720
'40,751
410
14,771
1,421
7,453
1,595
375
66,776
485,755
412,950
9,439
127,!!3'
18,144
61,848
11,192
1~,856
1~140~297
490,139
358,1o7
3,561
(19,013)
15,156
32,!52
9,678
43,643
~33,424
49.8
53.6
72.61
117.6
54.5
65.8
53.6
24.1
55.0
LIQUOR FUND
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
$755,0oo
$300,000
$565,000
65,263
29,789
48,056
577,955
234,354
427,100
177,045
65,646
137,900
76.6
78.1
75.6
MINUTES OF THE
MCUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OCTOBER 12, 1987
Present were: Chairman Thomas Reese; Commissioners VernAndersen, William
Meyer, Geoff Michael, Brad Sohns, William Thal and Frank Weiland; Council
Representative Elizabeth Jensen; City Manager Ed Shukle; Building Official
Jan Bertrand and Secretary Marjorie Stutsman.
Also present were the following interested persons: Susan Dailey of Merrill
Lynch, Don Larson, Earl & Nila Erlander, Eric Berglund, Kurt Berglund, Norman
T. Berglund, Richard Rucinski, Clarence & Carol Krotzer, Paula Gronlund, Bret
Haage, Gary Paulsen, Daniel & Elizabeth Tveite, Nancy Barclay and Jack Cook.
The minutes of the Planning Co~-~ission meeting of September 14, 1987 were pre-
sented for consideration. On Case 87-662, Page 2, Sohns stated he did not
make the motion; change maker of the motion to Meyer. Weiland moved and Thal
seconded a motion to approve the minutes, of the September 14, 1987 meeting as
corrected. The vote was unanimously in favor.
BOARD OFAPPEALS
1. Case No. 87-641 Review and interpretation of development on Kildare Road
Lots 11-20 and 27-36, Block 11, Seton; PID ~ 19-117-23 21 0032
Norman T. Berglund was present.
The Building Official, Jan Bertrand, explained that this piece of property
was in for rezoning from the R-4 to R-2 a few months ago and also .they had
requested a vacation for Longford Road vacation which was denied. Now Mr.
Berglund is requesting that parcel be split up robe sold as individual R-2
parcels. She noted that Kerry Lane going north and south thru there is
about the end of the utilities and the blacktop as you go west on Kildare
Road. Normally it does not take a subdivision to break up land because
they are platted lots; but the County (because Mound has so many undersized
lots) does require staff approval. The City Engineer talked with Mr. Berg-
lund and it was agreed to keep intact the parcel west of the improved street,
watermains and sewer (Parcel E) and the proposed resolution shows the pro-
posed split of the land.
Thal moved and Michael seconded a motion to recon~nend approval of the
proposed resolution dividing the land.
Council Representative Jensen stated Attorney Jim Larson had questioned.
whether or not we were creating new parcels by doing this; that there was
something about the way they were deeded that we may have an opportunity
to not create more bowling alley type lots. Mr. Berglund stated it was
under one deed; he purchased these lots 20 years ago and former owner had
combined them and had them rezoned for purpose of building multi-family;
Berglund has not been able to sell them for multi-family and so had it
rezoned back to single family which he said the whole area is zoned. The
Building Official stated that Jim Larson was concerned that property,
when split up, may not meet criteria for "lots of record" and would have
to maintain all the current criteria for the R-2 Zoning District which
means 10 foot sideyard setbacks. Meyer advised he is against proposal of
creating 40 foot wide bowling alley type lots because he feels these will
keep coming back for variances. Berglund stated area won't support large
homes, but if someone wishes larger lots, they could buy 2 parcels. The
Commission discussed and it was noted lots meet legal size, width, etc.
Planning Co~missionMinutes
October 12, 1987 - Page 2
The vote on the motion was: Weiland and Meyer opposed; all others in
favor. Motion carried by a 6 to 2 vote. .
This will be back on the City Council Agenda October 13, 1987.
Case No. 87-669 Lot size variance for property at 3100 Inverness Lane
Lots '17 and 18, Block 5, Pembroke; PID~ 19-117-23 33 0010
Owners John and Melvin P. Bosma
The Building Official explained that she put a proposed resolution in the
packet on this item as square footage is well within the 10~ limitation
and Mr. B°sma is supposed to be closing on this property contingent on-Vari-
ance approval on October 15th, so rather than waiting to send it to the
Council on the 27th, it is on the agenda with a proposed resolution to be
adopted and any changes the' Commission wishes to make would have robe
relayed %o the Council at the October 13th meeting.. One alteration she
would like added as Item 5: Upon the further condition that a soil test
be submitted prior to parcel development(before they build on the lot).
Sohns moved and Andersen seconded a motion to recon~nend granting the
the lot size variance with the conditions in the proposedresolution
and also the addition of Item 5 that soil test be sutznitted prior to
parcel development. The yote was unanimously in favor.
'This will be on the City Council Agenda October 13, 1987.
'Case No. 87-670 'Front yard 'setback 'variance for 4619 CarlowRoad
Lots 1,2,3,4,5 and E, i0 feet of 6, and adjacent part of street vacated
along the same; Block 24, Seton; PID%'s 19-117-23 24 0044/0045
Owner DonLarson and Contractor Richard Rucinski were present.
The Building Official explained the request to add a 14 foot by 21 foot
one story three season addition to the existing home on the north. The
survey sul~nitted does show encroachment, but that is incorrect. Mr.
Larson has letter showing 8 foot street vacation was done in 1964. The
road was platted at 66 foot wide. Present structure is 25.7 feet to curb
line; there is quite a bit of right-of-way. She noted that she had ex-
plained the Ordinance requires a variance for each structural modifcation
"to the applicant. Staff recon~nends approval of the requested variance
with condition no further modifications be made without variance approval
and tax parcel for 8 foot vacated portion of CarlowRoad adjacent to this
property be combined with this property.
Andersen moved and W~iland seconded a motion to recon~nend approval of
the staff's recon~nendation. The vote was unanimously in favor.
This will be on the City Council Agenda October 27, 1987.
Case No. 87-671 Lakeshore setback variance for 4354 Wilshire Boulevard
Lot 80, Phelps Island Park 1st Division, also land lying between Lot 80
and the shore of Black Lake; PID % 19-117-23 13 0013
Applicants, Earl and Nila Erlander, were present.
The Building Official explained they are requesting to construct'an 8 by
28 foot above ground deck within 30 feet of lakeshore. She reviewed
some history found in the file on previously granted variances. In 1981,
Planning Co~ission Minutes
October 12, 1987 - Page 3
Resolution 81r87, a former owner was granted a variance to enclose
what used to be a deck withthe stipulation that no deck be added a%
a future date. Apparently the north end of the house was open then.
The structure was originally built before the adoption of the Flood
Plain Ordinance and was built 38 feet + to lake.
Mr. Erlander stated they wish deck in order to maintain property; it is
a little frightening to get up and caulk, paint, etc. the lakefront side
of home; basically want to put deck on for access to windows. Mrs.
Erlander questioned .not being told it was cut and dried and they could
have saved the $50. She also co~,ented neighbors have decks closer to lake.
Weiland moved and Sohns seconded a motion to reconm~end denial of the
request.
The Conm~ission explained that it certainly was an inconvenience not to
have a deck in order to maintain their lakeshore windows; but that finan-
cial hardship was not part of criteria to grant a variance.
The vote on the motion to deny was unanimously in favor.of the denial.
This will go to the City Council on the October 27, 1987 agenda.
Case No. 87-672 Minor subdivision of land re: 2666 Westedge Boulevard
Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Batdorf's First Addition; PID %'s 23-117.-24 24
0014/0059;. Nancy Barclay, Applicants Daniel. Tveite and Elizabeth Tveite,
Clarence Krotzer, Bret Haage and Paula Gronlund'were present..
The Building Official explained that Mr. & Mrs. Barclay are in the pro-
cess of selling the property and the neighbors, Mr. & Mrs. Tveite, want
to purchase half of Lot 3 adjoining their property. The division would
make one parcel have 14,930 square feet and the other 15,430 square feet.
As the first survey did not show the location of the garage..on. Lot ~,..she
had the surveyor go back and locate it with conforming setbacks (descrip-
tions were adjusted). Staff reconm~ends approval of the proposed division
upon condition accessory structure have 6 foot sideyard setback to the
north property line and that utilities be located and if there is an en-
croachment, they be relocated onto Lot 4 and south half of Lot 3. She
noted, that because these people hay, been delaying closing, and this is
a conforming minor subdivision, she has prepared a proposed resolution
and this will go to the City Council on October 13th.
The Chairman stated he understood Barclays are not the fee owner, but
Contract Purchaser. Clarence Krotzer stated he is the fee owner. The
Chair stated Mr. Krotzer was the person who should have made this appli-
cation. Mr. Tv. ire stated 1½ lots were going to be sold to one party and
he was buying the other ½. Mr. Haaqe stated he is a third party buying
the property and he understood he was purchasing Lots 3 and 4. He stated
they had the title work done on the property preparatory to closing on
Lots 3 and 4 and if descriptions are other than shown on purchase agree-
ment, it becomes a legal problem and will cause a problem with the mort-
gage company and they'll be unable to close. The Buildin9 Official said
there were some difficulties in the closing, however, that was not a
Planning Con~nis~ion Minutes
October 12, 1987 - Page 4
Planning issue. The ~ots do conform to our Ordinance. The Chair noted
the fee owner needs to be agreeable to wanting Lot 3 subdivided. Nancy
Barcla%[ stated they, as Contract Purchasers, put the house up for sale
with ~ealty company's full.knowledge and the people they bring through,
that they were going to split off the half of the lot to go to owner of
Lot 2. Mr. Krotzer stated he would okay the division subject to checking
it out with his attorney on Tuesday prior to the Council meeting.
Weiland moved and Sohns seconded a mDtion to recoranend approval of the
minor subdivision subject to Mr. Krotzer's checking it out and signing
the application as fee owner. The vote was unanimously in favor.
.This will be on the City Council agenda October 13, 1987.
6. Case No. 87-673 Side yard setback variance for 4452 Denbigh Road
Lot 2 including adjacent vacated street, Block 1, Avalon; PID ~ 19-117223
24 0002; Jack Cook was present.
The Building Official explained Mr. Cook received a variance a short
time ago to place a garage on the street side of his home; we allowed
that within 3 feet of the side lot line and 12% feet of front property
line. Now, he wants to add a second floor on this existing home; do. struc-
tural modifications with beams and supports and has continued to build a
deck which is there at the present time. It is sitting within the 3.7 foot
to 4.1 foot setback on the west which is non-conforming.
The Conxnission discussed the request at length; they thought we could allow
minimum requirements and that the deck should be cut down or come off; also
it was thought that the building should be brought up to Building Code.
The applicant stated he would like approval to continue building the upper
story and get it closed 'in 'at this time and then come back with some plans
for the deck situation at the next meeting; that could be Under another
application.
Sohns moved and Weiland seconded a motion to reco~-~;end approval of staff
recommendation. After some discussion, "bringing the structure up to
Building Code" was added to the motion. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Mr. Cook was advised, if he wishes to come back with a revised plan, he
can apply for an amendment of the variance. This will be on the Council
agenda of-October 13, 1987.
The Building Official advised that the minor subdivision request by Lucille
Maas.,~ for 5916-5930 Glenwood Road (Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, Block 4, Minne-
sota Baptist S~L..~,er Assembly) has been withdrawn at this time.
DISCUSSION ITEM 1 It was agreed that interviews for Planning Con~nission·mem-
bership will be scheduled for the end of November.
ADJOURNMENT
Andersen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to adjourn at 9:25 P.M..
in favor, so meeting was adjourned.
All were
Gl. Paul Pioneer Pre,s DiSpatch 1
.Buainess/Twtn Cities
· Monday, oCi°i)er' ~9, ~e87
emp.loYs_
dive,:se ho el Str'a eg ea
Radisson expafids into Far East. Canad..
· ' . · .. - ~ . · ""~'~
d,scount Country Hospitality.line Opens ::
By Jim McOartney ' ..... '"
Staff Writer
The Carlson Cos. would
like to match the success
of the Minnesota Twins
and their "homefield
advantage.".
While the Twins are competing
for the No. 1 slot in baseball, the
huge, diversified Plymouth-based
company ownedby Curt Carlson is
moving Closer to its own goal of
entering the hotel industry's top 10.
Its Radisson hotel division has.
moved in the last four years from.
[gth nationally in amber of rooms'
o 12th, based on its own estimates.
of The eompuny is taking a number
strikingly different approaches
m an effort to move up two more
notches: Marketing the luxury
Radisson hotels to women
travelers, building a new chain of
discount inns, and expanding into
foreign markets.
But there is one factor common
to carlson's diverse strategies --
the underlying belief that no
matter how far they travel or how
much they pay for lodging, all
customers want to feel at home.
"Nobody really wants to be in a
hotel -- they would rather be
home," said Roland Bauman,
manager of the ritzy Radisson
Plaza hotel in downtown
Minneapolis.
"We try to make the hotel as
dose to home as you can have. We
avoid putting junk in the guest
rooms, and that applies to the
design throughout. We have
restaurants that don't look like
caverns, but are reminiscent of
home."
Carlson Cos.' '~o place like
home" strategy can be seen in
various ways:
· It is giving an increasingly '
homey touch to the interior design
of Radisson hotels in an attempt to
appeal to women travelers -- a
key element in its marketing plan
-- and get away from the
__aceoratng to Suergen Barrels. the
: ;; Nobody really
Wants to be in a
'hotel .-- they
would rather be
home.
Roland Bauman
Manager
Radisson Plaza
·., Minneapolis
head of the Carlson Cos. hospitality.
group.
h m With th~ slogan "Just like
ome.," the company will have a
grand opening Thursday for the
prototype in Burnsville of its new
discount chain, "Country
Hospitality Inns" Cozy touches
the inns will inc~l~ude f~'eplaces
the lobbies and down-filled quilts
on the beds.
· The "hotel as home" concept
also underlies Radisson's rapid '
expansion into foreign markets,
ineinding the Far East, Europe and
Canada. Barrels feels that the
Radisson name, increasingly
familiar in the United States, will
have a comforting and
recognizable appeal to U.S.
business travelers who are visiting
foreign countries.
Bartels hopes home appeal will
continue to propel the hotel group
along the rapid growth pattern he
set when he came to the Carlson
Cos. four years ago. He promised
then that he would grow the hotel
division from 89th in size in the
country to the ranks Of such
: industry giants as .Ramada Inn ~ind
Marriott.
.8o far, he apPears to be on '
schedule. Since 1083 the hotel . ..
divisiOn has grown to 152 hotels ·
' with 36,000 rooms, from 39 hotels
~9:2.00 rooms.. During that time
me hotel group has added $2 billion
m new hotels and 16,000
employees. Revenues are
projected to increase to $770
million this year, from $605
million in 1986.
The group has an additional $960
_ million in hotels under
co~tructi6n now, and b~;the ~nd of:
next year there will be 50,000
rooms under its management. ' ''~
While that is a far cry from the
industry leader, Holiday Carp., -
with more than 303,000 i'ooms, it
moves the Radisson clOSer to the
top 10. In Lodging Hospitality.
Magazine's ranking by numbers of ·
rooms at the end 'of 1986, Radisson
was 16th, with 23,662. Bartels'...
.calculations about Radisson's
~ncreases since then compared
with those of the companies ahead.
of it on the list lead him to believe
his company now is 12th.
As is increasingly common in the l
· hotel industry, Radisson will
manage, not own, the new hotels.
Most hotel chains prefer to deploy
their assets into management '
services rather than into real
estate, according to Stephen Sherf,
partner in the Minneapolis office
of Laventhol & Horwath, an
accounting firm that studies the
hotel industry. The chains also find
it easier to expand when they don't
have to finance their own
development..
"We want to build 40 hotels a
year, and that's in a climate of
decreasing results for the
industry," Bartels said.
The rapid growth of Radisson
through acquisitions is part of a
hotel industry trend toward
consolidation. "A' lot more people
are traveling from coast to coast,
not just regionally any more," said
Sherf. "The regional chains are
finding it to their benefit to be
national. That way they can
support national advertising. You
need a lot of rooms to support
that"
, Hospitality Inns have toll-free
reservation lines, which would be
too expensive for a small chain.
The hotels expect to pick up more
than 20 percent of their bookings
through the toll-free systems.
No' more men's' clubs
Bartels believes that one of the
key elements of success for the
Radissons will be their appeal to
women_ Women continue to be '
overlooked in business travel,
despite their growing presence in'
that marketplace, he said. In 1970,
only I percent of business
travelers were women, acc°rding
to. Bartels. Now One-third of all
travelers are women, he said, with
that percentage expected to rise to
half by the end of the century.
"We must change from the
brown and beige men's club look to
a more modern style," he said.
Radisson hotels are being
designed with a-lighter, more
colorful appearance and greater.
use of pastels, shades and patterns,
Barrels said, adding that women
want class, not "shag carpets and
nickel-and-dime paintings."
Sitting in the Festival
.restaurant, the main dining room
of the new Radisson Plaza in ......
downtown Minneapolis, Bartels
said that the pink piano in the
corner "wouldn't have gone under
· the old style."
Earlier attempts by hotels to
appeal to women failed because
women were not given what they
wanted, according to Bartels. In
the 1970s, Hilton experimented
with segregated floors for women
that offered extra security, frilly
decor and a special "Lady Hilton"
in-house representative. Women
didn't like this, particularly the
dormitory effect of segregated
floors, Barrels said.
Criteria the same
Radisson's studies show that
women have many of the same
criteria in choosing a hotel as men
do. They want hassle-free
.__registration, comfortable
accommodations, appealing meals,
good service and cleanliness.
· But they also want additional
security, including electronic card
systems instead of keys, deadbelts,
chains, self-locking stairwell doors,
.and better lighting in parking
ramps~ Barrels makes sure his new
'hotels incorporate such security
items.
In addition, women ask for suites
where business can be transacted
in a room separate from the
bedroom, and for club lounges or
executive floors where guests can
socialize for breakfast or after-
dinner cocktails in a more relaxed
atmosphere than a bar or lobby,
Barteis said.
"Although men world never
have asked for it, they like the
more residential look of the rooms,
'as well as the club facilities and
other amenities,,.he said. '. ........
Homey touohes
Barrels says the feminine touch
ls carried over into Carlson Cos.'
new chain, Country-Hospitality
Inn.q, The preferred name, "Coun-
trademarked, but 'q-Iospitality" is
de-emphasized in the logo.
"In other discount hotels, it was
as though men who did p. ublic hous-
ing were doing them ruth their old
turquoise or black-and-red interi-
· ors," Bartels said. ·"Most of them
were designing truck stops."
The "just like home" theme is
Carried throughout'the inn. Onthe
'outside· is a front Porch with
shutters on the windows/In the lob-
by, wooden chairs surround a small
fireplace. The walls are bordered
with handpainted stencils. All the
rooms have grapevine wreaths on
the walls over the beds. Such items
ss lamps and phones are not at-
tacbed to the walls or desks, so-
they can be arranged to suit the
lodger..
'~Ve have tried to develop a
strong residential look," said Scc'
Mey~er, the manager of the ~.
room prototype Country Inn that
recently opened in Burnsvill~
The addition of Country Inr~q
gives Carlson Cos. a foothold in the
lower end of the hospitality mar-
ket. Its Radisson group hotels al-
ready compete in the top two seg').
ments of the lodging industry... '-
Radisson Plaza hotels compete
with Hyatt Regency, Westin and
some newer Marriotts and Hiltons
in the luxury market, where
ledgers pay $100 and more a night
for their roon~ Radisson Inns op.
erate in the full-service market;
where rooms cost $70 to $100 a
night and the competition includes
other Hiltons and Marriotts and
new Holiday Tn,~
Now, with Country Inns, Carlson
will be competing in the. limited-
service market, where such chains
ss Hampton Inn, Comfort Inns and
Days Inns offer rooms for $35 to
$50 a night.
Carlson 'also Will attempt to ap-
peal to the upper end of the limit-
· ed-service market with Countr
Suites, an upscale version of ti,
Country Inn. The prototype for this
inn style was built this year in
Coon Rapids near'Northtown Cea-
son will not have an offering is the
budget market, where such chains
· as Super 8, Motel 6 and Econolodge
Maintaining
qtiality and
· consistency will
be one of the '
company's
biggest.
challenges !n
general as it
continues to
grow.
compete for customers looking for
rooms at less than $35 a nighL
Although the two Twin Cities
Country Inns are the only ones op-
· erating so far, there already are 37
franchisees signed up to build
. more. The company expects to
have 300 within five years, accord-
ing to John Olson, senior vice pres-
ident of Country Inns.
· 'Hotels/. carlson. Cos. :sets
'fevered expanSion' ' pace
_ The company has deals set in the
Maine, Vermont and New Hamp-
shire region, as well as the Indiana,
KentuCl~y and Tennessee area. "We
have been expanding at the rate of'
about one (t~ranchise agreement)
per week," Olson said. . ...
"We've really eliminated all the
extra services you don't need to:
pay for," said Edward "SMp"
Gage, president of the Carlson
Cos., who is Curt Carlson's son-in-
law. "That includes ballrooms,
meeting space, and room service."
CocoUntry Inns are a subsidiary of
untry Kitchen International, the
Carlson Cos. chain of family res-
tam'ants. Country Kitchen officials'
hope that about 80 percent of the
new Country Inns have Country
Kitchens built next to them. The
decor in the' 136-seat Country
Kitchen in Burnsville is similar to
its Companion inn next door in .the
country manor theme.
"In Country Kitchen, we did a
number of restaurants with budget
hotels." Gage said.."We decided
that we're in both sides of this --
why don't we do it too?" -
The association between the inn
and the restaurant is suggested but
not mandatory, said Richard Hob-
man, president of Country Kitchen.
Also recommended but not re-!
quired is a liquor lounge in the~,
Country Kitchen. The inns and res-
taurants usually will have differ-
ent owners, Hohman said.
Together, the average cost of a
Country Inn and Country Kitchen
is about $5 million. The Country
Inn costs about $30,000 a room,
and can be built in 20 weeks. Carl-
son Cos. is recommending franchl-'
_sees___.~e M.A. Mortenson Construct__
tion of Golden Valley, which built
and owns the first inn in Burns-
ville.
There are about 250 Country.
Kitchens in 20 states and two
Canadian provinces.
Global ambitions '
: If, many business travelers in
the United States like staying at a
· home-away-from-home hotel, Carl-
son Cos. is' betting that Americans
o aV. e. Ung ab. road also may .yearn,
r me conuorts of home. The re-*
suit 'is an aggressive campaign to
spread the Radisson name world-
wide through associnUon with
eign hotels. : -.. ~
ey are more aggressive in
expanding 'into Eui-ope and over-'~:
seas than other hotel companies,"
Sherf said,- "Since so much of the
European travel is American, it
makes sel~se."
So far, Radisson has expanded
into Canada, Germany, gwitzer-
land, Scandinavia, the Middle East
and the Far East. About 65 of its
hotels are located outside the Unit-
ed States.
.' , The expansion is made easier by..'
the foreign contacts of Bartels, a
native of Germany who has
worked.in Europe and Canada. His
background also inspires him with
a competitive fervor.
"'The hoteliers"in-E[U-op~ have
always set the standard, but not
any more. I want them to come to
M/nnesota to see_the state of the
· rt, smd Bal~.. els, referring to, the
new Radisson Plaza Hotel in down-
town Mirmea~lis.
Radisson announced last month
.that it was expanding' into the Far.
-East'throUgh a joint venture wtth,
H~ng.Kong,based Park Lane Ho-]
tels International. The two wilI l
pursue joint development of howls|
under the Radisson/Park Lane!
name in the Asia/Pacific region.
Radisson also said it would em-
bark on a major 'expansion pro~
gram in Canada beginning 'Nov. 1
with a 277-room Radisson Plaza in
St. John's, Newfoundland. The
Radisson name will appear on sew
eral hotels in major Canadian cit-
ies in the next two years. Barteis
said the company is negotiating for
more Canadian locations, and ex-
pects to have deals set within 15
months.
Two years ago, Radisson entered
into a joint marketing agreement
with MovenpiciL a Swiss hotel con..
cern. At least one jointly devdoped.
hotel Under the Radisson/Moven.'
pick name is expected to open next
.. Most of the foreign ho.tels ~a~e
managed by the foreign partner,
not by Radisson. In such arrange-
merits, Carlson makes its money by
· charging for management support
. services, as~well as for a share of
· the overall cost. Of-marketing and'
of the.toll-free telephone reserva-
tion system.
Withbut management responsi-
. bility, Carlson may encounter diffi-.
· culty in maintaining consistency in
the. fo. re. ign hotels. "If things get
out ot line,, we can dissolve the
partnership," Gage said. '.'But the
· real key is finding the righ{ part-
hers in [he ih-st place."
ency will be one of the c0mpanlfs
biggest challenges in general as it
continues to grow. In fact, because
of the variety of hotels that are as-
suming the Radisson name, Barrels
emphasizes that Radisson is a "col-
· lection," not a chain. About half the.
''current Radisson hotels are man-
' .aged by the company, with the rest
· : franchised. - .
'. He hopes to meet the quality
challenge by carefully selecting.
which hotels the CompanY.takes:
over and who it hires to run them.
.Rapid:growth is one waY to attract
the best young talent the industry
has to offer, he said.. ·
Side benefit
Carlson Cos. also benefits from
other subsidiaries that comple.
ment its hotel group. For instance,
Carlson owns such major travel
agencies as Ask Mr. Foster with'
400 offices and P. Lawson with 111,
offices in Canada. With a total
650 offices, Carlson has become
the largest travel agency in this
country and second largest in the'
world.
: markets," Gage said of. the hotel,
and travel agency ~roups.
are in similar bUSinesses,i and it's
good for our executives to talk'to
each .o. ther and be fantiliar with,
each other's businesses."..
HoWever, he said that'each busi-
: ness COncentra. tes on serving its'
own customers, not those of anoth-
er subsidiary. The company's trav-
el.agencies are not told to favor
Carlson hoteis :in' making recom,
· mendatiOus to customers, he said.
· :...'.:..: .! ..:. :"
BarteJs recognizes that.it may
be difficult ~).'keep Up the expan,
sion pace he's seL The investment
ctimate for new hoteis is weaken-
ing, he. said, because tax' revision
has sheared away some of the
breaks investors &nce goL' Rising
interest rates and the anticipated
recession, also wi]] dampen new de-
velopment, according to Barte]s.
'"! ha~;e :made a 5i~ p~-omise of'
continued'growth despite this cti-.
. mate," he said. "We just have to
crank up= the machine another
notch."
league of minnesota oities
October 13, 1987
TO:
FROM:
City Clerks ~
Donald A. Slater, Executive Director
RE:
1988 Proposed Legislative Policies and Priorities
Enclosed you will find your city's copy of the League's 1988
Legislative Policies and Priorities. Please distribute copies to your
mayor and councilmembers for their review.
The general membership will adopt the 1988 Legislative Policies and
Priorities on Wednesday, November 18 at the Sheraton Midway Hotel in
St. Paul. Registration opens at 9:00 am and the adoption meeting
begins at 10:00 am. (Please see the October magazine for registration
forms). Every member city has one vote to cast at the meeting. It is
important that your city is represented so your city's views can be
expressed.
Our six policy committees developed these policies through the League's
policy process. The policy process begins in June at the annual
conference. Committee meetings continue throughout the summer. Each
policy committee recommends topics for issues papers to be discussed at
the League's regional meetings. At the regional meetings, cities
voted--via a written ballot--on these issues. The results were shared
with committee members, who took these results into consideration when
drafting the final proposed policies.
As you can see, an extensive amount of work went into drafting the
proposed policies. Therefore, your city's suggestions on them is very
important. I hope your city will be represented at the Policy Adoption
Meeting on Wednesday, November 18.
If you have any questions concerning the proposed policies please feel
free to call:
Committee
Development Strategies (DS)
Elections and Ethics (EE)
General Legislation-and Personnel (GLP)
Land Use, Energy, Environment and
Transportation (LUEET)
Revenue Sources (RS)
Federal Legislative (FL)
Staff Person
Donald Slater/Lynda Woulfe
Helen Schendel
Joel Jamnik
Joel Jamnik
Laurie Hacking/Sarah Hackett
Ann Higgins