Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1988-02-09
CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING ~ 7:30 P.M.~z_.TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS *4. *5. Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Minutes of the January 26, 1989, Regular Meeting Pg. 293-302 PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Vacation of Certain Perpetual Easement Over Part of Lots 4 & 10, Block 12, Seton Pg. 303-306 CASE #88-619: Rob Maiers, 1729 Bluebird Lane, Lot 7 Except the North 14 feet and Lot 8, Block 9, Dreamwood, PID #13-117-24 21. 0029 Reques.t: Lot S~ze Variance Pg. 307-315 CASE #88-702: Randall Johnson, re: 26XX Tyrone Lane, Lots 14, 15.& 1'6, Block 16, Seton, PID #19-117-23 23 0030/0031 *6. Request: Minor Subdivision Pg. 316-320 CASE ~88-703: Suburban Lighting, Inc. for Fina, 1730 Commerce Blvd.,Part of Lot 27, Lafayette Park, PID #13-117-24 22 0025 Request: Sign Setback Variance Pg. 321-331 These cases will be presented at the February 8th Planning Commission Meeting. Due to the uncertainty of the second Council Meeting in February, these items will be given to you on February 9th. Information will be handed out Tuesday evening. Reschedule Second Meeting in February due to Precinct Caucuses on February 23rd {SUGGESTED DATES: February 24 or Harch 1) Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Construction of a New Public Works Facility for the City of Mound {Est. cost to be handed out at meeting.} Pg. 332-333 Page 291 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. A. B. County Road 15 Watermain Replacement Update (Materials to be handed out Tuesday evening) Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present Presentation of Annual Reports: Jim Fackler, Parks Director , Geno Hoff, Street Superintendent - Greg Skinner, Sewer & Water Superintendent Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and the City Manager to Enter Into a Purchase Agreement with Gerald J. Yarnes & Rebecca Yarnes for Property Known as PID #13-117-24 33 0067 (5440 Lynwood Blvd.) Appointment of Assistan't Weed Inspector Tax Forfeit Property Resolutions: A. PID #30=117=23 22 0028, Lot 17, Block 4, Devon B. PID #24-117-24 44 0055, Pt of Lot 24, Block 5 Arden Set Date of Public Hearing on Use of Year XIV CDBG Funds ' - (SUGGESTED DATE' March 8, 1988) License Renewals Payment of Bills INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS january 1988 Monthly Reports from Department Heads Lake Level Flow & Precipitation Summary for December 1987 as prepared by Minnehaha Creek Watershed Dist. Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) UPdate from Area Representative, Glenn Olson Park Commission Minutes of January 14, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes of January 25, 1988 Pg. 334r343 Pg. 344~350 Pg. 351-358 Pg. 359 Pg. 360 Pg. 361-363 Pg. 364-366 Pg. 36'7 Pg. 368 Pg. 369-382 Pg. 383-417 Pg. 418-419 Pg. 420-422 Pg. 423-425 Pg. 426-427 Page 292 January 26, 1988 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - jANUARY 26, 1988 The City Council of Mound,~ Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 26, 1988, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Liz Jensen, Phyllis. Jessen and Skip Johnson. Councilmember Don Abel was absent and excused. Also' present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer john Cameron, City Planner Mark Koegler, Finance Director john Norman, City Insurance Agent Earl Bailey and the follow- ing interested citizens: Margaret & Bob Hansen, Barry Schneider, Tim Kane, Vern Andersen, Frank Hancuch, Cheryl Grand. The Hayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MINUTES ~ ~ MayOr'Smith asked that the vote on Case #87~661 be corrected to read "..,3 in favor with'Councilmember Jensen voting-nay...", in the August 25th minutes. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to approve the minutes of the January 12, 1988, Regular'Meeting, as presented, The vote was unanim-. ously in favor. Motion carried. CASE t88:'~0¥: ._FRANK BuYSSE, 2009 COHMERCE'BLVD., HOUND S,QRES, PID #14-117-24 14 0037, VARIANCE - PARKING LOT SETBACK The City Planner reviewed the request explaining that the parking lot is al- ready in place. The owner when notified that a variance was required, prior to the parking lot being installed, elected to continue construction and to apply.for the variance "after the fact". The Planning Commission recommended denial of the variance request. MOTION.made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to deny the request for a variance_in, parking .lot setback for Frank Buysse, 2009 Commerce Blvd., PID t14-117-24 14 0037, P & Z Case #88-701. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVE THE LOCATION OF NINE DOCK SITES ON LOST LAKE CHANNEL, CITY OF MOUND PROPERTY The City Manager explained the request. The Park Commission recommended ap~ proval of the request for 9 dock sites. Barry Schneider, representing Jel- lico, the developer, stated that access (a utility and public walkway easement) will.be granted to the ar~a proposed for docks. The easement will consist of a l0 foot wide strip which will consist of a 4 foot wide strip of January 26, 1988 asphalt with 3 feet of gravel on either side for walkway and maintenance vehicle access to the dock site area. He explained that 9 sites were measured out, 30 feet apart, for the total 290 feet that is there. Margaret & Bob Hansen, 5425 Bartlett Blvd., spoke against approval of these dock sites because of the environmental impact on the wetlands and con- sequently Lake Minnetonka. Tim King, 2447 Lost Lake Road, spoke in favor of the dock sites because there is already boat traffic in the channel and snowmobiles traffic in the marsh area that does not appear to be harming it. There was discussion on who wou?d maintain the channel.. Councilmember Jessen suggested 6 dock sites instead of 9. Councilmember Jensen stated she would still have to vote against this because of her concern about motorized traffic in the Lost Lake area. The City Attorney suggested that if this reso~utio~ is approved the following be inserted, "Jellico agrees to dedicate autility and public walkway easement to the area.proposed for docks.~ The easement will consist of a'lO foot wide strip which will consist of a 4 foot wide strip of asphalt with.3 .feet of gravel on either side for walkway and 'maintenance vehicle access to 'the dock site area to be installed by Jellico." The Council agreed. Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~88115' RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE LOCATION OF SIX DOCK SITES ON LOST LAKE CHANNEL, CITY OF HOUND PROPERTY The vote was 3 in favor with Councilmember Jensen voting nay. Motion carried. PARK cDHHISSION The' City Manager.explained that the Park Advisory Commission was never for- mally established in the City Code. He is suggesting that an ordinance be adopted creating this Park Advisory Commission and establishing its duties and terms. Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following: ORDINANCE ~10-1988 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 255 TD l'~E CITV CODE. CREATING A PARK ADVISORY COHMISSION AND ESTAB- LISHING ITS DUTIES The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. .. 9 january Z6, 1988 The City Manager then suggested appointing the. members of the Park Commission to conform with the new ordinance just adopted. The appointment would be as follows: To one year terms beginning January 1, 1988: Cathy Bailey and Linda Panetta. To two year terms beginning january 1, 1988: Marilyn Byrnes and Nancy Clough. To three year terms beginning January 1, 1988: Shirley Andersen and Stephen Burke. Jessen moved and johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~88]'16 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PARK COMHISSION RECONHENDATION TO ESTABLISH TERNS FOR THE COHMIS- SION ~E~BERS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF .PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND .AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NE.W PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY FOR THE CITY OF MOUND The City Engineer explained that he will'not be ceady to present the plans and. specifications for the new public works facility until the next meeting. No action was taken. --COMMENTS &SUGGESTIONS FROH CITi'ZENS PRESENT- There was no response. REPORT FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE AND RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR & CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES WITH BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT' SERVICES(BDS).TO PROVIDE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES The City Manager explained that this Task Force was set up by the Mayor in November 1987. The purpose was to define the economic development problems that exist in the City of Mound and develop strategies to resolve those problems. The members of the Task Force are: Vern Andersen, V & S jewelry, Chairman; Chic Remien, Executive Director of the Westonka Chamber of Commerce; Kathy' Boese, Westonka Foods; jerry Longpre, Longpre's; Bob Polston, former Mayor; Kim Yillek, local resident; Frank Hancuch, President State Bank of Mound; Cheryl Grand, Contel; Dick Schwert, Norwest Insurance; Steve Smith, Mayor; and Ed Shukle, City Manager. 10 January 26, 1988 The~Task Force has developed a mission statement that indicates the economic climate in the City of Mound must be improved by strengthening existing businesses and attracting new business development to the City focusing on the Central Business District as well as City-wide development. They are recom- mending that the City .hire a private consulting firm, Business Development Services (BDS), to-perform services that will develop an economic development program for the City. The cost would be $3,375. Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION t88-17 RESOLUTION AUlllORIZING Tile I~kYOR AND CITY RANAGER TO SIGN A CONTRACT WITH BUSINESS DEVELOP~NT SERV- ICES (BDS) FOR ECONOHIC OEVELOPMENT SERVICES The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1988 INSURANCE PROGRAH Mr. Earl Bailey, which are as follows: R. L. Youngdahl & Associa_tes, j~resented the new premiums Property Crime Equipment General Liability Auto Liquor Liability Emer. Med. Techs. Public Officials E & 0 Police Professional Worker's Compensation Bonds TOTAL Specialty. Lines: 1987 - 10,566 285 ~5,239 40,246 21,051 7~677' 7,825 4,368 45.,231 1,099 143,587 1988 1988 PROJECTED ACTUA'L 11,000 10,920 i11) _ 30 0 .293 (1) - 5-,200 .5,153 (1.) 46.,000 39.,053 (~) 21,000 21,200 (1) 7,800 6,525 (2) Incl. Incl. (1) 10,000 5,438 (1) 4,400 .Incl. (1) 48,600 55,200 (3) 1,200 mm' .1,099 (4) 155,500 144,881 (1) (2) (3) (4) League of MN. Cities Insurance Trust thru N.S.R.S. Transcontinental Insurance Co. (CNA) thru John Crowther' League of MN. Cities Insurance Trust thru E.B.A. Capitol Indemnity Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: mm .. 11 january 26, 1988 .- RESOLUTION #88-18 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE POLICIES, PREHIUHS AXD COMPANIES AS SUBHITI'ED BY NR. EARL_BAILEY, R. L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOCIATES FOR THE 1988 INSURANCE PROGRAM The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CHANGE FEBRUARY 23~ 1988~ COUNCIL HEETING DATE The City Manager explained that the 2nd meeting in February is the same eve- ning of the Precinct Caucuses. The Council decided to address a change of meeting date at the February 9th meeting. LYNWOOD BLVD. PROJECT/1981 STREET IMPROVEHENT PROJECT The Finance Director explained that the Lynwood Blvd. Project .was f~nalized by State Aid in December 1987. The Project. has. a deficit of $38,831. He then explained that there is a surplus in the 1981 Street Improvement Project Fund and suggested using that surplus for the deficit in the Lynwood Blvd. Project. Johns°n moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION i88L~' RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER $38,831 FROM ll(E 1981STREEEI' IMPROVEMENT FUND TO ll(E LYNWOOD BLVD. IHPROVENENT FUND The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion-carried. The Council then discussed what to do with the remaining surplus in the 1981 Street Improvement Fund. Johnson moved and jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #88-20 RESOLUTION TO SET A~SIDE SURPLUS FUNDS, NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, IN THE 1981 STREET IMPROVENENT FUND FOR CAPITAL IMPROVENENTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY The City Clerk explained the various resolutions that were proposed on the tax forfeit property. The.fo]lowing asks for conveyance to the City for because of topography: PID #19-117-23 21 0023/0029/0030. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: January 26, 1988 RESOLUTION t88-21 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE FROI~ THE STATE OF CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Clerk explained the background .on PID #24-117-24 44 0023 and 0207 and recommended cancelling Resolution ~83-141, combining the two lots and releas-. ing them for public auction. Johnson 'moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION t88-22 RESOLUTION CANCELLING RESOLUTION t83-141 REBARDING LOT 28, BLOCK 1, ARDEN (TAX, FORFEIT PROPERTY) AND RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS TO NENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AND CERTIFYING TilE SPE- CIAL ASSESSHENTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The .City Clerk explained that PID ~19-117-23 34 0036' has an uninhabitable house' on it. The Council asked that the Clerk check wi%h Hennepin County to see if the.house can be;torn down before i;t is released, MOTION made by Smith,' seconded by.jensen to table this item'until fur- ther information can be obtained. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Clerk recommended that.~he fOlloWing two properties be. conditioned..to *be sold. only_..to adjoining property oWner~:' PID #19-117-23 31 0118 and #19- 117-23 34 0013, Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #88-23 RESOLUTION RECONVEYING {IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Clerk explained that the following properties had temporary construc- tion easements on them that have now expired. The State is asking that we reconvey these easements. The City Engineer has reviewed these easements and recommends reconveyance ..................... PID ~30-117.-23 22~0013,.#.25-117-24 21 0134, #25-117-24 21 002.8, #24-117- 24 44 0190, #13-117-24 21 0030. .. 13 January 26, 1988 Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION t88-24 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RECONVEYANCE LANDS TO THE STATE OF HINNESOTA OF FORFEITED The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Engineer recommended.that- the following two parcels be kept for drainage purposes: PID #19-117-23 32 0096/0097. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 188-25 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR CONVEYAIICE FROg THE STATE OF CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jen~sen' ~o authorize ~he-payment of 'bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $157,155.81, when funds are available. A roll call vote'was unanimously in favor. Motion carried~ COUNTY ROAD 15 - WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT &'STREET LIGHTS The City Engineer reported that.bidS.have now been received by Hennepin County for the watermain replacement .a~d~ the new.-.street.lights'on County Road 15. -The street light ·bid 'Was very good; $8'1,070. Engineering. estimate was $99,722. The watermain replacement bid was extremely high, $79,008.50. The Engineer's revised estimate for this is $55,000 to $60,000. The City Engineer stated that if a better price cannot be negotiated with Hardrives and their subcontractor, he would recommend that the City request that Hennepin CountY delete all or part of the watermain replacement from the contract and the City negotiate directly or request quotes from other utility contractors. The Council agreed. SET DATE FOR A COUNCIL WORK SESSION There was discussion about setting a date for a Council Work Session for the purpose of following up on the Team Building/Goal Setting work session held january 22 and 23, 1988. The suggested date was February 27, 1988. The City Manager will check with Barbara Arney, Government Training Services, to see if that date would work out for her. 14 ._ January 26, 1988 BOAT LAUNCH PARKING LOT IN MOUND The City Manager reported that he just received a Draft Feasibility Report ~ Boat Launch Parking Lot in Mound, from the Metropolitan Council. They are as- king for comments and conclusions on this before they prepare a final report. March 1st is the deadline for those comments and conclusions. The City Manager suggested giving this report to the Park and Planning Commis- sions for their review and then possibly holding a special Council Meeting before the deadline, to discuss their comments and conclusions and to formulate a response. The Council discussed dates for a Special Meeting and chose Saturday, February 20, 1988, at 8:00 A.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Council went into Executive Session to discuss negotiations, of a real es- tate transaction at 9:50 P.M. They returned at 10:05 P.M. NOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jen~en to_authorize the City Manager and the City Attorney ~o negotiate for the'p~rchase of property on Lyn- wood Blvd., subject to Council approval. The v~te was unanimously in favOr.. _Motion carried. INFORMATION/NISCELLANEOUS Ae Preliminary Year-End 1987 Financial Repor~ as Prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. · Report from Counc'ilmember jeSsen'on the NLC Conference in December. Ce Financial Health_Pr.ofile.as. Pr.epare by the State Auditor'·s Office for the Years Ended 12/31/82 - 12-31-86. De 'Letter from Pamela Plumb current President of the National League of Cities, re: NLC Update on Legislative Priorities. Notice from NSP re: Interim Electric Rates. Fe Ge REMINDER: NLC Annual Congressional City Conference, Washington, D.C., March 19-22, 1988. IF YOU WANT TO ATTEND, CONTACT FRAN ASAP REGARDING ARRANGEMENTS. You received an agenda earlier. It is critical that you decide NOW if you want to attend. REMINDER: TEAM BUILDING/GOAL SETTING SESSIONS - 1/22 and 1/23 at the Lafayette Club. Begins at 5:30 P.M. on 1/22. See you there. ZOO I. REMINDER: Radisson Hotel. If you are interested in attending, please let know ASAP. Planning Commission Minutes of january 11, 1988. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to adjourn at 10:10 P.M. vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. January 26, 1988 LMC Legislative Conference _- February 16, 1988 - St. Paul Fran The~ Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk BILLS .... JANUARY 26, 1988 Batch 80) 1 Batch 8012 TOTAL BILLS 102,328.96 54,826.85 157,155.81 H:A~ING NOTICE CITY OF HOUND HOUND, HINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF CERTAIN PERPETUAL EASEMENT OVER PART OF LOTS 4 AND 10, BLOCK 12, SETON NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, wiill meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7.:30 P.M. on Tuesday, February 9, 1988, to consider the vacation of the following described easement: A perpetual easement 10~'feet in width for public sewer and other utility purposes, including the right to open, lay out, construct, maintain and service the same and the right to remove trees, brush and soil therefrom, over, under and across Lots 4 and 10 in Block 12 of Seton, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles .in and for said county, the centerline of said easement being the East line of said Lot 10. SU~ch persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. · Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk Publish in The Laker January 18, 1988 & January 25, 1988 RESOLUTION 87- RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN PERPETUAL EASEMENT OVER PART OF LOTS 4 AND 10, 8LOCK 12 OF SETON. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City Council ma~'by resolution vacate any easement when it appears in the interest of the public to do so; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has claimed a perpetual easement for public sewer and other utility purposes over the following described land: Lots 4 and 10, Block 12, SETON, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, a public hearing wac and WHSREAS, it has been determi and good area planning requires be in the public interest to do NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVI Minnesota, hereby vacates the fo~ -988, as required by law; is no longer required acated and that it would L of the City of Mound, A perpetual easement 10 feet in width:for public sewer and other utility purposes~-including' the right to open, lay. out, construct, maintain and.. service the same and the rightlto remove trees, brush and 'soil therefrom, over, under and across Lots4 and l0 in Block 12 of Seton, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said county, the centerline of said easement being the East line of said Lot 10. A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared by the City Clerk and shall be a notice of completion of the proceedings and shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder and/or the Registrar of Titles, as set forth in M.S.A. 412.851. ~ EOEAqG JAMES O. ROBIN PETER %: JO]KA'SO/~ JO~E~' %% W~D, ~ G~ L P~GER LAW OFFICES KOENIG, ROBIN, JO~TNSON & WOOD z905 COMMERCE BOULEVARD MOUlfD, MIlflfESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1060 730 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINATESOTA 5539! (612,) 475-151,5 C. SCOTT MASSIE JA-~ES l,~. %~EiNXU~ T CHRIS STEWART ER/C C. D.~I~L~EYER CLaRESON LL%~D LEY 0~ CO'C'~SZL EARLE J. NIEDERLUEC~E JAi~ES D. lW_~cKIIm~ON December 22, 1987 REPLY TO: MOUND City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Attention Edward Shukle, City Manager RE: William Burton Easement Matter Dear Ed: By now you have received the check from Mr. Burton covering the expenses involved in shifting the Sewer easement from its present location under the house to the side llne of the property. The City promised to vacate the present sewer line that is encroaching upon completion of the alternate line. We would appreciate a copy of the resolution vacating said line. Thank you. Very truly yours, KOE N/I'G, RO~I.3~/~H NSON & WOOD F'ROF'OSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. :E:7-61'.-} RESOLUTION RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 87-58 TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING UNDERSIZED LOT FOR LOT 7~ EXCEPT THE NORTH 14 FEET, AND LOT 8, BLOCK 9, DREAMWOOD~ PID ~ 13-117-24 21 002~ P & Z CASE NO. 87-619 (1729 BLUEBIRD LANE) WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a lot size variance to allow the construction of a ~ by ~foot two story qarage_ and living space addition to his existing dwelling and amending Reso- lution :E:7-5:E:~ and WHEREAS~ the R-2 Zoning District requires 6~000 square foot lot area and 6 foot side yard, 15 foot rear yard and a 20 Eoot front yard setback~ and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does rec°mmendl the amendment to Resolution 87-58 to allow the construction of a two story garage and living space with conforming setbacks. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota.~ as ~ollows: 1. ]-hat the City does hereby, authorize the existing noncon- forming undersized lot as 1729 ~Biueb~i'rd'Lane; PID # 13-117-24 21 00 2 9. 2. The City Council authorizes 'the existing undersized lot and aOthopizes the alterations set forth below pursuant to Section 2:'4~4(')4, Subd. (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawYul, nonconforming use, subject to ail the provisions and restrictions o~ Section 2:3.404. :3. It is determined that the livability o~ the residential u~it will be improved by authorizing the following alterations to the nonconforming use property: A. Expansion of the principal building with a 2~by ~ foot two story garage and living space upon the condition that a site plan be revised to indicate conforming set- backs to the property line. Case No. 87-617~ TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff ~_ FROM; dan Bertrand, Building Official Planning Commission Agenda of February 8, 1~:B8 CASE NO. 87-619 APPLICANT; Rob Maiers LOCATION; 1729 Bluebird Lane LEGAL. DESC.; Lot 7 except the North 14 feet and Lot 8, Block Dreamwood; PID ~ 13-117-24 21 002~ SUBdECT; Lot Size Variance EXISTING ZONING; R-2; Single Family PROPOSAL~ The applicant -is requesting a lot size variance to allow the construction of a 24 by 28 foot two story garage and living space addition to his existing dwelling and he~ did re~ove the e)4isting 12 foot by 24 foot detached garage. This is a revision of the request fro~ March 9, 1~87 to allow the garage which is presently being constructed to have. a living area above that space for his present home. COMMEN]~S:- The R-2 Zoning Bis~rict ~equires a 6,000 square foot lot area. The present size of. Lot 7 except the North~ 14 ~eet and all of Lot 8, Block 9, Drea~wood Addition is 5,306 square feet!. The R-2 Zoning District requires a 6 foot side yard, 15 foot rear yard and 20 foot front yard setback. The applicant"s proposal includes an undersized lot and the two story garage addition to the existing ho~e with conforming setbacks to the side and front lot line. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends approval of the proposed second story addition as requested with conforming front yard and ~side yard setbacks to the property lines. The abutting, neighbors have been notified. ]'h'e date'this will be referred to the City Counci]. will be deter- mined later. .n. ECEi',/E : ,--,.. - -"se No. CITY OF HOUND AppLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following information) Fee Paid 1. Street Address of Property 2. Legal Description of Property: Addition~~__~'gr?n~j~ · D~te Filed Addressl-'?~-~ ~, Block ~ No. ! Day Phone No. _~'--Z~- ~t/~' Applicant' (if other than owner): Name Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: ( *lf Other, specify: ( ) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. (~Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other 6, Present Zoning District ' 7. Existing Use(s) of Property /~-'~--~ ~ ~-~_ 8. Has an application 'ever been made for zoning variance, /~r conditional use permit'or other zoning procedure for this prope, rty? t~ .t~, ~ If so, list d~.ate(s)~f list.date(s) of application, action taken a~d ~rovide Resolution No.(s)/~'~. Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I 'certify that all of the above statements and.the statements contained in any required papers or 'plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon t-he premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining ~nd removing such ~ot.ices as may b~ requ-i'~'~--~'~ l~w. Signature of Applican~~_/.)k~!~--~ Date /// ~/~ ~ ' Planning Commission Recommendation: Da're 2-8-88 Council Action: Resolution No. Date 2-9-88 Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure Case # _ ~7- D.. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, et~. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. I!1.' R~quest for a Zonin9 Variance .A. All information below, a site plan, as described in Part il, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone. district in which it is located? Yes (//) No ( ) . . If "no", specify each n~n-conforming use: Do. the existing structures comply with'all area.height and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is.located? Yes (/) No ( ) If "no", specify each non-conforming use: Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses .permitted in that zoning district? ( ) iToo narrow ( ) Topography' (' ) Soil (/.) Too sma]l ( ) Drainage (*) Sub-surface -(-)' Too shallovJ. ( )''Shape .( ) Other: Specify: ee Was the hardship d~scribed above created by the action o~ anyone having property interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (") If yes.~ explain: F. Was the hardship created by a~Y'Other ~h-~ade change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (/) If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for which'you request a variance peculiar. only to the property described in this petition? Yes '( ) No (/) If no,' how many other propertqes are similarly affected? He What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to-p[operty in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? January 14, 1988 Planning Commission City of Mound Mound, MN 55364 Dear Sirs, I am requesting an addendum to Resolution #87-58 granted to me on March 24th, 1987. The original resolution granted permission to build a 22'x26' garage on an undersize lot as long as conforming front and side yard setbacks were maintained. The footings, foundation, and floor have been completed as per Planning Commission requirements. Walls and roof construction has not begun. At this time I am requesting permission to build a 22'x26' addition directly above the garage. The addition will contain two bedrooms. Enclosed please find a front view of the house with the proposed addition outlined in yellow. Your extra time and consideration on this matter is greatly appreciated. Thank you. rely,~ Rob Maiers 1729 Bluebird Lane Mound, MN 55364 RGM/cmw Enclosure Harch 2~, 1~87 -RESOLUTION NO. 87- ~8 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COM~ISSlON RECOMMENDATION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING UNDERSIZED LOT FOR 'LOT 7, EXCEPT THE NORTH 14 FEET, AND LOT 8, BLOCK 9, DREAMWODD, ?ID # 13-~17-24 21 0029; ? ~ Z CASE NO. 87-619 '(1729 Bluebird Lane) WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a lot size., variance to allow the construction of a 24 by 28 foot garage additio~ to his existing dwell ing and removal of an'existing 12 by 24' foot detached garage; and WHEREA§, the R-2 Zoni. ng District requires 6,000 square foot lot area and 6 foot-sideyard,.. '15 foot'rear yard and'a 20 foot front yard setback; and WHEREAS, the Plan~ing Commission'has reviewed the request and . does recognize the existing undersized lot size, but recommends the required 20 foot front yard setback. NOW, ~HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council.of the City of Mound, Minnesota, the variance is approved'to allow a garage addition, to the existing' ho~e with conforming s~tbacks omthe undersized 5,306 square foot+ property for Lot 7, except the North. 14 feet, 'and Lot 8, Block. 9, Drear~vood., PID # 13-117-24.21 0029,.1729 .Bluebird.Lane, · The..foreg~ing resolution.was moved by Councilmember ~ensen and seconded by.Council~ember Abel. The following Councilmembe~s v~ted in the affirmative: Abel, Jansen, J'e~$en, Johnson and Smith. The following, counci'l'm.embers v?.ted, in the negative: none, Attest: City Clerk CE!2TIFF_I_'CATE OF SURVEY ROB MAIERS Prepored for: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot'7 except the north 1~.00 feet and all of Lot 8, Block 9, DREANWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. GENERAL. NOTES COMMON PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 88-702 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A WAIVER OF THE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 330:185 OF THE MOUND CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR LOTS 14, 15 AND 16, BLOCK 16, SETON; PID ~ 19-117-23 23 0030/0031; P & Z CASE 88-702 WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision requirements contained in Section 330 and under Chapter 462 oF the Minnesota State Statute and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and WHEREAS, an apPlication to waive the subdivision requirements contained in Section 330 of the City Code has been Filed with the City oF Mound; and WHEREAS, said request For waiver has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council~ and WHEREAS, ..it has. been determined that there are special circumstahces aFFecting Said properties such that the strict ap- plication oF the ordinance would deprive the applicant oF the reasonable use oF his land; and' that the waiver is necessary For the preservation and enjoyment oF the substantial property rights; and that granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE I¥ RESOLVE[;, by the City Council, the City oF Mound, Minnesota; the ~requ~s~ ,oF the applicant For the ~aiver From the provisions oF Section 330 oF the City Code and the request to convey that property of less than 5 acres, described as Follows: Lots 14, 15,and 16, Block 16, Seton; 'PIB# 1'~-117-23 23 0030/0031. It is hereby granted to permit the conveyance in the Following manner as per Exhibit A: F'arcel A: Lot 16 and the North 20 feet of Lot 15 as measured along the East and West lines thereo~, All in Block 16, Seton, according to the recorded plat thereoF, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot area square Feet. Parcel B: Lot 14 and 15, Block 16, except the North 20 feet oF Lot 15 as measured along the East and West lines thereof, Seton, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot area 6,4'~: square feet. RESOLUTION 88- Upon the Curther ¢ollowing condition: That the existing strLIEture has confor~ing 10 foot sideyard and the retaining wall to be constructed will be entirely on Parcel B. Cw It is deter~,ined that the foregoing conveyance will constitute a desirable and stable development and it is in harmony with adjacent properties. l'l, The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the applicant for filing in the Office o~ the Register o~ Deeds, or the Registrar o~ Titles of Hennepin County to show com- pliance with the subdivision regulations o~ the City. Se This lot conveyance is to be filed and recorded within 180 days of'the adoption date o~ this reso- lqtion. 3/7 Case No. 88-702 TO; Planning Commission, Applicant a~d FROM; dan Bertrand Planning Commission Agenda of February 8, ,_~ ~ _ .-~ CASE NO. .~._. 70~ APPL ICANT~ Randall dohnson LOCATION~ 26XX Tyrone Lane LEGAL DESC.; Lots 14, 15 & 16, Block 16, Seton~ PID 1'~-117-23 23 0030/0031 - Map 7 SUBdECT~ Minor Subdivision EXISTING ZONING~ R-3~ 1 & 2 Family Dwelling PROF'OSAL~ The applicant; Randall dohnson, has applied to sub- divide Lots 14, 15 and 16, Block 16, Seton. They are requesting the waiver of the provisions for a major subdivision plat of land., public hearing, park dedication and escrow account. COMMENTS; The land is located i-n the R-3 District which requires /_-.,00c) square feet of lot area for single family and 12,00¢) square ~eet for a two family.dwelling, and a 40 foot lot width, 10 ~oot side yards, .15 foot rear yard, and a ?:0 foot front yard. The ~e>.':isting lot sizes are as follows: Lot '14 is a platted 40 foot by 100 feet, Lot 15 is platted~ 40 ~eet by' approximately 123.83 and Lot 16 is 40 by 125+. The~ topography of the lots'indic'ate approximately a 2.5 foot difference from the East boundary of Lot 15 to the center line o~ Tyrone Lane. ]-he owner is requesting that Lot 15 be split in approximately half and combined with the new existing home on Lot 14 and the Northerly half o~ 15 to be combined with Lot 16 to t~he~ North. Both lots would have in excess of the /--.,000 square foot minimum ~or two single family dwellings. Section 330 of. the City~ Code would, al low th is subdivision with the waiver of the public hearing as a minor sub- division. F'ark dedication fees would not be established as it would not be creating additional building sites. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends approval of the proposed dividing line of Lot 15 upon the condition that Lot 16 be combined with the Northerly half and Lot 14 be combined with the Southerly half of Lot 15. A new survey shall be submitted to indicate the legal descriptions and division line of the subdi~vi- sion of Lot 15. The proposed retaining wall to be constructed on the East side of Lots 14 and 15 shall not cross the division line of Lot 15. The waiver from the platting requirements of. City Code Section 330 shall be granted. The abutting.neighbors have been notified. The date this will be referred to the City Council will be determined later~ APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND FEE FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL _ocation and complete legal des priori of property ZONING Tobe. divided as follows: !~/0-(-J~p iJ~, J~,O'Y"'{'~ k~ ~C O~ /~ b~l'~i~ , ~i~C~' " -- o6'~obfh75o~'Ph l,'ne.~ oG /~. A11 supporting'documents, such as sketch Plan's, surveys,.attachments, etc. must be submitted in 8~" x 11" size and/or 1~.coPies plus one 8~" x 11" copy. (aaach su~ey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by numberj A WAIVER. IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: qew Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet Reason: '(signature) ~,/' ADDRESS / ¢ ~ o ¢ ~'. ~ c C ,'/)~-y ~j. ~ny Pom~t<¢ ~¢.o~d,'¢;°n~l IoP,~l¢ c~o~'4~ ~e OWNERS of ~e prope~, or an explan- This application must be ~gned by I at/on given why this is not ~e case. k~l G,.r,- PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: -i ® F'ROF'OSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 88-70:3 RESOLUTION 88- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A SIGN SETBACK VARIANCE FOR FINA AT 1730 COMMERCE BOULEVARD; F'ID# 13-117-24 22 0025; F' & Z CASE NO. 88-703 WHEREAS, the applicant, Suburban Lighting, Inc., Con- tractor Cot Fina, has requested a setback variance Cop the ~ree standing sign at the location shown on Exhibit A~ and WHEREAS, said sign would be erected as a ~pee standing sign that would be located South o{ Three Points and East o~ Com- mepce Boulevard with zero ~ooo~ setback to the ~urthest projection o¢ the sign shown on Exhibit~B~ and WHERE~S, said sign would iden~i~y the Fina Service Sta- tion at 1730 Commerce.Boulevard~ and " WHEREAS,. the Planning Commission has reviewed, the request ~or the 50 Square ~oot ~re~ standing sign and the .two canopy signs and does recommend the sign be approved as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV.ED that the City Council the City o¢ Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the sign variance ~or a ~ree standin~ ~..,0 square ~oot sign with a height o~ 20 ~eet to be located as shown on E~hibit A and as described on Exhibit B, upon the condition th'at ~the canopy Cree standing sign comply with the provisions o~ the Sign Ordinance Section 3/_-.5 o~ the Mound Code ~or 1730 Commerce Boulevard; PID# 13-117-24 22 (o)(.)., ._. CASE NO. 88-703 TO; Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM; dan Bertrand, Building Official CASEPlanning NO. Commission 88-703 Agenda of February 8, APPLICANT; Suburban Lighting, Inc.; Owner, Fina LOCATION; 1730 Commerce Boulevard LEGAL DESC.; Part of Lot 27, Lafayette Park; PID No. 13-117-24 22 0025 SUBdECT; Sign setback variance EXISTING ZONING; B-2 General Business District F'ROF'OSAL; The applicant is requesting a .setback variance to allow a conforming size free standing sign of 50 square feet zero feet to the property line. The canopy signs which will be mounted are conforming free standing sign. COMMENTS~ The Sign Ordinance of City Code Section 365 states that the free standing signs shall be set back from the property line 10 feet. The present location of the c'anopy foundation and new structure will obstruct the n~w sign from-the lc) foot setback The site..has two light poles' and'a fire hydrant to ~he 'West side of the canopy. The applicant is proposing to locate the new free standing sign between the two light standards with the ~rojected sign 2 1/2 feet to the West in line with the e~:isting fire hydrant. The present pylon sign has received variances over the past years in 1'~72, 1t~83 and 1;~84. The previous owner of the property has reduced the size of the sign over the years, but it is still larger than the pr~'sent Ordinance requirement. The tree growth along the South property line has made it necessary for the new owners, Fina, to relocate thi~· free standing sign further to the North to be visible from the traffic northbound on Com- merce Boulevard. The canopy has been reconstructed due to a vehicle hitting the former canopy and damaging it which required replacement of the canopy. ]'he canopy is being elevated approxi- mately 2 feet from the old height to alleviate future damage by vans pulling into the gas station area. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends approval of the proposed sign location zero feet to the property line with the projection' of the Westerly edge of the sign being limited to 14 feet from the East curb line of Commerce Boulevard and 14 feet North of the fire hydrant. The abutting neighbors have been notified. The date this will be re~erred to the City Council will be determined later.' CITY OF HOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following information) Case No. ~' v Fee Paid 0--~, ~ ~ D~te Filed /-ZO~~ 2. Legal Description of Property: Lot Street Address of Property Add i t'i'on Owner's Name ~Y'.--z' ~? Block _,~4...,~ PID No. /.~- // ? - & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.s-' Day Phone No. Applicant (if other than owner): Type of Request: (~c:~ Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Amendment ( ) Zoning Interpretation $ Review ( ) Sign Permit ( ) P.U,D. ( )*Other ( ) Wetland Permit *If other, specify:' Present zoning District' ~r~~ 7- Existing Use(s) of Property(/'~/~ 8. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or .other zoning procedure for this property? ~-~ If so, list date(s) of llst date(s) of application action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of ~re~iou~ resolutions shail accompany pre~ent request. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Hound .for the purpose of inspecting, oE of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. :.'"Si gna ture Of Applicant ~//,/~ ~/~// Date//- Planning Commission Recommendation: Date 2-8-88 Council Action: Re~olution No. Date 2- 9- 88._~.~. ~ APPLICATION FOR SIGN PEP, HIT ".' -. c 'n' OF MOUND ADDRESS ~'97 7 ~~""U'('~) ,.~x~, ?(,,/~ ~~~~~~ ~0~ Street N~ber ·City / Zip (lf'othe~ than applicant) Name , Address Name Add tess . SIGN LOCATION' /~. Ai~DITION LOT ... BLOCK' ALLOWABLE SIGNAGE @ ~ = ' ' WALL AREA ........ BY' .Ft. = TOTAL ... EXISTJNB Squa re Footage · ZONING DISTRICT - SQ. FOOTAGE OF S I GNS,~/=)~O~'/~-~ NO HEIGHT OF SIGN ~ I . ' ILLUMINATED: YES SIGN SIZE' BEING REQUESTED i~Y TYPE OF SIGN: = : : SQ. PT. :' " WALL MOUNT. LENGTH OF TIME SEASONAL .SIGN TO BE ERECTED':' FREE STANDING PORTABLE OTHER PLEASE DESCRIBE REQUEST AND REASON FOR REQUEST: Date submitted Reccm.mendation: 3~R APPROVED: Building Official i 5~_0,, 47" F SHI~ r~ WIDTH MOd/dT' 7~3 3~7 ~o~y l~ovember 27, 198zl RESOLUTION NO. 84-193 RE$OLUIION IO CONCUR WIIH IHE ?LANNINU COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A SIGN PERMIT FOR TEXACO, 1730 COMMERCE BLVD., AS REQUESTED (PID ~13-117-24 22 0025) WHEREAS, the Getty Oil Station at 1730 Commerce Blvd. has'been sold to Texaco; and WHEREAS, Texaco now wishes to install their sign which is proposed to be 45 square feet (6 feet by 7 feet, 6 inches) to be mounted on the existing pylon; and WHEREAS, this sign will be approximately 1 square foot less. than the Getty sign; and WHEREAS, the Pl'~nning Commission has recommended approval. NOW,-THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby, concur with the Planning Commission recommendatiOn to approve a sign permit for Texaco, 1730 COmmerce Blvd. (PID #13-117-24 22 0025), as requested. The foregoing resolution was move.d by Counci%member Peterson and seconded bY Councilmember 'Jessen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Charon,~Jessen, paUlsen, Peterson and Polston. The following Council_members voted in the negative: none. MaYor Attest: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 72-46 RESOLUTION GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERF~T FOR GASOL]2~E SERVICE ST,%TION (plat 6169o, Pa oel ~RA$, by Resolution No. 72-16, adoptod January 11, 1972, a hearing was .~.~llcd for a Special Use Permit for a gasoline service station on the southeast corner of the intersection of Three Points Boulevard and ¢ounty Highway~ll0 for Feb~y 8, 1972, and . ~S, by Resolution No. 72-52, adopted February 8, 1972, the hea~ing " ~as continued to February 29,' 1972 and was held, .~ NOW, T~RE, BE IT RESOLVE~... BT TEE ¥ILLACE COUNOIL OF MOUND, ~0Uh~D, That the o~ner of Plat 61690, Parcel 8140 be granted a Special. Use Permit for a gasoline service station with the following stipulations: -' 1. This Special Use Permit is for the construction of a a gasoline filling station as shown on site plan marked, '.'Exhibit A" and pictures marked, "Exhibit B,: C, D, E and F." · 2. Site improvement of bituminous pavement and tand~¢apiz~ shall be in conformance with "}~chibit A." 5. Structures and signs shall be painted or of bric~. '4. Ingress and egress shall conform to the requ~ements of Hennepin County Highway Department. 330 '5. All structures shall meet the requirements of the }Iou. z~d · Building Code and State Regulations. 6.. This Special Use Permit is authorized for the opera,ion of a gasoline filling station and the sale of related products. Automotive repair s~mll be limited to carburetor and ignition work and replacement of external engine parts, and other minor repair work. Heavy repair work and body work, disassembly or replacement of engines, transmissions or differentials are not authorized under the provisions of this permit. 7. The posting of a performance bond in the amount of $2,500 to assure installation and ma~tenance of the'land~capi~ and maintenance of the structure is to become a part of tkis permit. The bond is'to be for 18 months after certi- fication of occupancy is issued. the Council this 29~h day of.February, 197~- FAY F...TYTI~ i /, O3 r-o MOUND PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY REVISED PROJECT ESTIMATE February 9, 1988 ITEN Site Work Architectural and Structural New Addition Remodel Existing Reily Garage (Arch. & Struct.) Mechanical and Electrical SUBTOTAL City Purchased Equipment Land Purchase Architectural Fee and Construction Management Legal, Fiscal and Administrative Cost TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST ESTIMATED COST $ 57,500.00 361,300.00 62,000.00 158~400.00 $ 639,200.00 lO,O00.O0 178,000.00 70,000.00 45~000.00 $ 942,200.00 VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA MINNESOTA 5905 Golden Valley Road · Minneapolis, MN 55422 · (612)546-3242 February 3, 1988 Mr. Steve Smith Mayor of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Smith: Volunteers of America, one of this nation's and Minnesota's largest human service organizations, has been helping others for nearly 92 years. Volunteers of America Week is scheduled for March 6-13, which commemorates its founding on March 8, 1896. I am asking you to proclaim the week in our behalf. During the previous fiscal year we provided 595,607 units of service (be it meals or days of care) to 13,488 boys and girls, men and women. But, more important than these numbers is the kind of care, the quality of service provided. We believe ours is a ministry of service as we give food and clothing, as we visit the sick and imprisoned, as we help a child learn to love and trust and grow. Your interest and support makes a significant difference in the success of our organization. And, as you know, our success is measured through the lives of those we touch. I sincerely hope you will proclaim March 6-13, 1988 as Volunteers of America Week in your community and ask that you join us in celebrating our 92nd year of service. Respectfully yours, ~tHogle, Jr. JEH/dt Enclosures VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK March 6-13, 1988 WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, a Christian social service organization, is celebrating its 92nd year of service to the people of Minnesota and the nation; it is therefore certainly appropriate for us to Join in the observance of this milestone with the commemoration of March 6-13, 1988 as Volunteers of America Week; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is making a valuable contribution to the people of Minnesota by providing 2 residential treatment centers for emotionally handicapped boys; 3 programs serving autistic, autistic-like and/or developmentally disabled children and youth; 40 treatment foster homes and group homes for infants, children and youth; 5 homes for elderly and/or mentally disabled adults; 41 senior citizen dining sites in Anoka and Hennepin Counties; 2 pre-release and work- release correctional programs for men and a Jail, workhouse, and work- release correctional facility for female offenders; plus 3 housing complexes for families, the handicapped, and the elderly; and 4 long- term care facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, through its compassionate, yet practical crusade, is extending spiritual fellowship as it provides relief where it is most urgently; and, WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is commemorating its founding in 1896 and urges others to uphold the American philanthropic spirit through their Commitment to help those in need NOW, THERE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, .~¥¢.~iZ~ ...... , Mayor of the City of MQ~ .... , do hereby proclaim the week of March 6-13, 1988, as VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK AND, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this proclamation be transmitted to the Volunteers of America as evidence of our esteem. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of .jto~ .... to be affixed this 9th day of February in the year of our Lord one tho~ nine hundred and eighty-eight. MAYOR McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Twin Cities St. Cloud 15050 23rd Ave. N. Telephone Plymouth, MN 612/476-6010 55441 February 1:)66 Engineers Planners Surveyors 1'O Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBJECT: Watermain Replacement Hennepin County Road 15 MFRA #8257 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: As requested, we have solicited estimates from some of the underground contractors which originally bid on the watermain replacement as subcontractors. We have received three estimates ranging from a low of $59,000 to a high of $70,000.00. As you will recall the bid price received by Hennepin County for this portion of the project was $79,008.50. It appears the City could save approximately $20,000.00 on the construction cost, but there are other items which would need to be taken into consideration. First of all, there is one item (temporary water services) in Hennepin County's bid for the amount of $4,100.00 which could be eliminated and, if needed, the City's Rublic Works Department could handle it for a cost of approximately $200.00. This would lower Hennepin County's bid to $75,000.00. Another item to consider would be the cost of project management and inspection, if the City were to let their own contract. We would estimate this to be about 15% of the construction cost, o~ approx~.matel¥ $12.00J~. This amount added to the estimated construction-cost of $59,000.00 would bring the total project cost to approximately $71,000.00 if the City is entirely responsible for the project. Ed Shukle and myself met with the Hennepin County personnel on Monday of this week to discuss the problems related to this project. Normally, Hennepin County would charge the City 10% of the construction cost to cover their expenses for construction management and inspection, which, in this case, would amount to approximately $8,000.00. They have agreed to eliminate this charge to keep the watermain replacement as part of their contract. The City would be required to inspect the actual watermain work, but this should amount to only about $2,000.00. Taking the previous facts into consideration, we are now talking about a potential difference of_only about $6~O00.O0_between a City project and letting Hennepin County have all the headaches. By headaches, I am referring to the problems we foresee with scheduling and working not only with Hennepin County, but also with their Contractor from whom this portion was taken away from. The City could also be blamed for delays if the total County project is not Formerly McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound February 9, 1988 Page Two completed on schedule; therefore, we are recommending that the watermain replacement be left in Hennepin County's project at a total estimated cost of approximately $77,000.00. This is approximately $22,000.00, over the original estimate of $55,000.00. Ed Shukle, John Norman and myself have discussed this, and are in agreement that this project can still be funded from the City's water fund. The City's water fund cash balance as of December 31, 1987 was $160,000.00. This is $23,000.00 higher than projected in the budget of $137,000.00. We will be able to finance the additional cost of the watermain replacement with water fund reserves. With the increase in water rates effective Oanaury 1, 1988, we should be able to maintain a cash balance above $100,000.00. As mentioned previously, we should not drop below $100,000.00 in the water fund cash balance; therefore, we will monitor the water fund revenues and expense activity closely during early 1988, and report any findings promptly to the City Council. We may have to seriously consider looking at a rate increase by July 1, 1988. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron OC:jmj Manna · Dinner Menu · Banaue! Facilities February 3, 1988 Mr. Steve Smith, Mayor City of Mound 5341Maywood Mound, Minnesota 55364 Steve, Surfside, Inc. marina has been licensed by hte L.M.C.D. on an as is basis since 1973. In November, 1984, the Mound City Council approved the Chapman Place/Marina concept on the property. Although has remained open to the public, the L.M.C.D. felt "this would be an excellent opportunity" to require Surfside to pull back to 100 feet from the present 200 foot length. Further, they have requested that the docks'be seasonal, ie no de-icing.. Although Surfside, Inc., the owner and operator of the m~rina, has been licensed for 51 slips (27' permanent dockage & '24 transiet) conforming to the L.M.C.D. requirements would create a tremendous hardship. It would cost up to $50,000 for seasonal dockage. By meeting the 100 foot requirement, the following would happen: me De There would be no fueling facilities. This would'leave the entire Upper Lake with only one fueling facility - Howard's Point. There would be no transient docking. It is not uncommon for 20-30 boats daily to dock temporarily to pick up people, to get bait, to picnic in the park, etc. There would be no area for loading passengers. As people launch their boat at the ramp the vast majority of boats dock at the marina to board their passengers. SURFSIDE INC. ~ooks ~av-Loke Minnetonko 2670 Cz, mm, erce Bird, Mr Steve Smith, Mayor page two 4. There would be no room for service docks and consequently no minor repair service available. 5- There would be no room ~or emergency ~eki~ during sudden storms or dockage for stranded boats that the sheriff pulls to the closest marina. 6. There would be no room for a company/service boat. On several occasions the Mound Police Dept., knowing that the marina was staffed, would commondere me and my boat for water rescue. I have personally received two Hazardous Water Rescue Certificates from the police dept. With no fueling facilities and no service area, no staff would be required and therefore no opportunity for availability for help for the general public. ?. There would be no pump out facility. A number of years ago, the L.M.¢.D. asked if I would consider installing such equipment as thare is currently no faCility on Upper Lake. I feel very strongly'that the aattitude-of the L'.M..C.D. is inconsistent with their own policy. First, the L.M.¢.D. frequently refers to destination points. W~th only 100 feet of docks, we certainly will no longer be a destination point. Secondly, according to findings dated December 10,1986, the L.M.C.D. Board is required by L.M.C.D. Code Section 3.08 to consider, 1. Whether the proposed facility will serve the general public as opposed to'a limited segment of the public or a limited geographic area. 2. Whether the facility will obstruct or occupy too great an area of the public water in relationship to its utility to the general public. The general public will not be served by decreasing dock size, the reasons for which are Aiscussed earlier. I feel that their requirements are not in the best interests of the general public and certainly not in the best interests of the citizens of Mound. With the above in mind, I would ask the Mound ~ouncil to support a 10ng time businessman and pass a resolution to accept and approve my City of Mound dock application. Mr Steve Smith, Mayor page %hree My sincere thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Surfside Inc. Joel R. Essig, President enclosures LAKE 402 EAST LAKE STREET BOARD MEMBERS Robert Rascop, Chairman Shorewood JoEIlen Hurt, Vice Chairman Orono Mark Westlund, Secretary Wayzata Wally Clevenger, Treasurer ainnetrista Marvin Bjorlin ' ' Tonka Bay Jan Boswinkel Minnetonka Beach Richard J. Garwood Deephaven Peter Hill Victoria Eon Kraemer Spring Park Richard Nelson Greenwood Robert K. Pillsbury ainnetonka Thomas W. Reese Mound Robert E. Slocum Woodland Carl H. Weisser Excelsior MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 September 16, 1987 FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Joel R. Essig, President Surfside, Inc. 2670 Commerce Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Essig: The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District is pleased to enclose an application form for. your use and guidance in applying for a 1987 Multiple Dock and Mooring Area license, f Please complete the application, including the necessary attachments: 1. Locator map. 2. County plat of the area. - 3. Certified survey and legal description. 4. Site plan of.dockage, launching ramp, and boat fueling system, which must'either be a Part of the certified survey, or overlay' the survey. 5. Dock construction details. 6. The site plan must also meet the following stipulations: .A. dockage must meet the 100 foot length requirements, B. dockage must meet the normal setback requirements, C. dockage be seasonally removed, and D. deicing will not be permitted. Return the application and attachments, along with the appropriate fee, to our,o~fice ............ :..; ............... Your cooperation in helping to "Save the Lake" is greatly appreci- ated. Should you need further assistance, please contact us. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Frank Mixa Executive Director enc: application c: Glenn G. Fredeen,. Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc. I I ! I I 3.011, Subd. 2 Rev. 6~1/82 Subd. 2. Purpose. It is the purpose of this chapter to carry out the LMCD's statutory responsibility under the enabling act to secure the safety of the public, to insure the most general public use of the lake, and to regulate the construction, instal- lation and maintenance of permanent and temporary docks and moorings consisten~ with federal and state law. To the extent that standards established by other governmental authorities are also set forth in provisions of this chapter, the Board of Directors has independently found that such standards are neces- sary, proper and consistent with the purposes of this chapter. (Ord. No. 18, Sec. 2) 3.02 'GENERAL REGULATIONS. Subdivision 1. Prohibition. No person shall use any area of the Lake outside an authorized doc]: use area, for docks, moorings, boat storage, swimming floats, ski jump storage or diving towers, unless such use is specifically permitted under the provisions of this chapter.' No person shall use any area of the Lake within any authorized dock use area for docks, moorings, boat storage, swimming floats, ski jump storage or diving towers without the consent of the riparian owner. No person who is in charge or control of any property on the lake whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee, or otherwise, shall allOw any sunken, wrecked, junked, or discarded boat or water- craft within any dock use area for a period of longer than one week; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply .to boats or watercraft within the dock use area of a commercial establishment engaged in the business of repairing and rehabili- tating boats or watercraft and which is so engaged with regard to such boat or watercraft. (As amended Ord. No. 26; Ord. No. 42) Subd. 2. Authorized Dock'Use Area. area is described as follows: An authorized dock use a) Length - The authorized dock use area for sites border- ing on the Lake extends into the Lake a distance equal to the site Lake frontage to be measured at right angles to the side site lines and, excgpt as provided herein, shall not extend into the Lake a distance of greater than 200 feet in the case of commercial doCks in existence on August 30, 1978, and 100 feet in the case of other docks to be measured on a line parallel to the site side lines ~as extended into the Lake. In the case of commercial docks' in existence on August 30, 1978, the lakeward extension of the dock use area more than 100 feet from the shoreline shall be limited to"the distance from shore of the docks in existence on said date and that portion of said docks more than 100 feet from the shoreline may not be altered or expanded. (As amended, Ord. 44) 3.02, Subd. 2 Rev. 6/1/82 (cont'd) b) Width - The authorized dock use area for si~,es bordering on the Lake is limited in width by the setback limitations pre- scribed herein. The setback from side site lines as extended in the Lake shall be as'follows: For that portion of the length of the authorized dock use area which extends from the shore Zero to 50 feet 50 to 100 feet 100 to 200 feet The setback shall b~ 10 feet 15 feet 20 feet Where'boat slips open toward a side site line, the setback pro- vided shall be at least equal to the slip depth, but shall not be less than 20 feet. Setbacks shall be doubled for all multiple docks or mooring areas and commercial docks on each side where such multiple docks are not located adjacent to another multiple dock or mooring area or commercial dock. (As Amended, Ord. No. 14, Sec. 2; Ord. No. 18, Sec. 3; Ord. No 19, Sec. 2; O~d Nu. 44~ I-)-- - C) Measurement - Authorized dock use areas shall be measured from the point which forms the shoreline when the Lake is at elevation 929.4, National Geodetic Vertical Datum, 1929. During periods when the Lake level falls belOw 929.4 feet and when so declared by resolution of the Board, the Executive Director may issue permits for temporary dock extensions beyond the author- ized dock use area ~ubject to the following limitations: 1.) Need for the temporary dock extension must be demonstrated by the applicant. 2.) The extension shall be a temporary, seasonal type dock. NQ extensions may be on pile driven or permanent, year-round docks. 3.) The extension shall meet all requirements of this Code other than the length limitation described in this section. 4.) 5.) The extension shall only be permitted during the time the water level is below elevation 929.4 feet and, at any given time, shall be permitted only to the extent of the equivalent dockage a. nd comparable depth existing at a lake elevation of 929.4 feet. The extension, together with the original doCk, shall not be used to provide storage space for a greater number of boats or watercraft than are authorized under this Code or for a greater number of boats or watercraft than are licensed if a license for the dock is required under this Code (Ord. 28) · SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT OF WATERFORD PROPERTIES, INC. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF RENNEPIN .). Thomas W. Prokasky, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states as follows: 1. That I am the President of Waterford Properties and have been the President of Waterford Properties from before March 21, 1986 to the present date. 2. That in my capacity as President of Waterford Properties I signed the AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF LICENSE DATED March 21, 1986 on behalf of the cor- poration. . 3. That as President of Waterford Properties, Inc. I have participated in the implementation of the Contract'fromMarch 21, 1986 to the present date. 4. That when Waterford Properties, Inc. acquired title to certain appurtenant real estate that it was done ~ith the understanding that Surfside, Inc. would continue to operate the docks and marina in substantially the same manner as it had been for many years and that the grant of an irrevocable license to Surfside~zas selected as a method for recognizing that Surfside, Inc. holds all rights with respect to the docks and marina facilities. 5. That the agreement with Surfside confirms that Surfside will continue to maintain a minimum of 27 boat slips that, I understand, is the historical number of such slips leased to the general public. 6. That the terms'of the AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF LICENSE dated March 21, 1986 neither guarantees such a slip to residents of the condominium nor affords them any priority in obtaining such slips but are intended to give them an opportunity equivalent to any member of the general public. 7. The provisions of paragraph 4 of the AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF LICENSE are intended to provide a way of compensating the association in a manner which is proportional to the amount of usage by its members. ~ 8. That there is no financial incentive to rent to members of the association, on the contrary, the fewer members of the association that rent slips the smaller the license fee required of Surfside, Inc. 9. That there are no understandings or further agreements which alter or add to the terms of the AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF LICENSE. 10. That during the 1986 summer season five persons who were members of the condominium association requested, and received the opportunity to rent boat slips in Surfside Marina. 11. That during the 1987 boating season five persons who are members of the association have (at least so far) requested the opportunity to rent boat slips in Surfside Marina. 12. That I understand that the Surfside has historically maintained transient slips for persons.who need boat dockage while other boats are enter- ing or leaving the water via the public boat launching ramp which is immediately adjacent to the dock property. 13. .That the transient slips further provide dock space for persons using the park facility immediately to the west of the dock facilities. 14. That the transient slips also provide dockage for persons who stop for marina services such as to obtain petroleum products. 15. That the transient slips also provide dockage for persons visiting nearby homes and businesses including but not limited to residents of the condominium. 16. ~aat usage o~ transient slips £or restaurant facilities no longer exists but all of the above usages continue unchanged. 17. That Waterford Properties recognizes that in the event that there is a default by Surfside which would result in a termination of Surfside's license that WAterford Properties would have no assurance that it would be able to obtain and operate docks on the same basis as Surfside, Inc. Dated May !.]~, i987. WATERFORD PROPERTIES, INC. SubsFribed and sworn to this I~ ~ day of May~ 1987. Notary Public Thomas W. Prokasky;, Preside~ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Re= Application of Surfside~ Inc. FINDINGS A public hearing for a commercial dock license for Surfside, Inc. was held at 7:30 p.m. on May 14, 1986, at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. Mr. Butch Es'sig appeared for Surfside, !nc. In the past, Surfside, Inc. ]]as been licensed for 51 slips, of whic~ 27 were designated for permanent rental and 24 were designated as transient slips for use by patrons of the restau- rant Previously Qn the site. The restaurant use has been discontinued and a 29 unit condominium has been constructed on the site. A previous application for a reconstructed and recon- figured marina facility serving the 29 unit condominium was denied 'the Board by order'dated July 1, 1985. The application for a 1986 license submitted on behalf of Surfsid~ indicated a reques%for a total of 51 watercraft avail- ability units (WAU's). At the hearing, Mr. Essig indicated that his application was redu~ed~to an application for 44 watercraft availability units, 27 of which were,'for permanent storage and the remainder of which were for tk'ansient use, service slips, and Owners of property in the vic y of the marina, including Tom Reese and JoAnn Ashenfelter, expressed concerns about the high density of use in the vicinity of the marina and the hazards associated with the Droximity of the marina %o %he adjacent public access and public swi~n%ing beach'. In considering an application for a multiple dock license, the Board is required by LMCD Code Section 3.08 to consider, among other things: j) Whether the proposed facility will serve the general public as opposed to a limited segment of the public or a limited geographic area. k) Whether the facility will obstruct or occupy too 'great an area of the public water in relationship to its utility to the general public. In the past, that portion of the facility which was devoted to commercial marina use was available to the general public at large as opposed to a limited segment of the public or a limited geographic area. Those portions of the facility which were devoted to a transient use were available to the public for use of the 'restaurant associated with the marina. The transient facilities could be uAd by members of the public as a stopping- off place to purchase food and beverages, to use restaurant facilities, and to enjoy the indoor and outdoor restaurant facilities at the site. In the past, the Board has recognized that providing such activities serves a legitimate public inter- est. These factors are no longer applicable in this case because of the conversion of the restaurant to a residential condominium. Therefore, the factors which previously justified the granting of a multiple dock license no longer serve as a sufficient justifi- cation for the number of transient slips previously authorized. 2 Additionally, on the basis of the information provided by the applicant, it appears that there has been a conversion of use as defined by LMCD Code Section 3.0~2, Subd. 4 which provides: Any change in rental policy of a commercial marina which limits or restricts the rental of any moorings or watercraft storage capacity to owners or groups of owners of specified real property is a conversion of use within the meaning of this section. Such a conversion of use means that the facilities must be brought into compliance with the current provisions of the LMCD Code. Under the current provisions of the Code, the maximum number of watercraft which can be stored at the facility, given the amount of shoreline available, would be 4. watercraft or, assuming the applicant could qualify for a special density permit under Section 3.081, 14 watercraft. Therefore, the facilities applied for far exceed the allowable density of watercraft storage 'allowed by the Code. The applicant has not submitted sufficient information to demonstrate that an impermissible conversion of use has not occurred. The information which has been submitted leads the Board to conclude that a conversion of use has occurred which requires the facilities to be brought into compliance with the current provisions of the Code. Furthermore, the applicant has not demonstrated sufficient justification for the continuation of the number' of transient slips applied for, and the Board specifically finds that the proposed facility will obstruct or occupy too great an area of the lake in relationship to its utility to th~ general public. ORDER On the basis of the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the license application of Surf$ide, Inc. for 1986 he, and hereby denied. By order of the Board o~ Directors o£ the La~e Minnetonka Conservation District this ~ day of ~ , l~. 0703AC02.E19 ~/Z~/~ 75-174 4-2 9-75 P~SOLUTION NO. 75-174 RESOLUTICN ISSUING A CO~.~LwR..CL~L DOCK PE~'~IT TO Si~2SIDE, INC. WHEREAS, an application for a commercial dock has been received from Surfside, Inc., and .WHEREAS, Surfside, Inc. meets the requirements of the Mound Dock 0rdinauce #333, NOW, T~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOU~, M~,~NESOTA: That a commercial dock permit be issued to Surfside, Inc. for 54 docks on water provided: 1. Provided the docks conform to Ordinance #333 and are constructed in accordance with Resolution No. 75-168. 2. The docks observe the sire yard set back on the west property line. Adopted by the Council this 29th day of April, 1975. 16. Granting the variance in part, an6.6enying it in part as hereinafter provided will diminish part of the adverse economic . impact upon Applicant which full compliance would otherwise have, and it would at the same time avoid most of the adverse consequen- ces to the Lake and to the rights of the general public which would result from granting the variance application in its entirety. 17. Granting the variance for docks lying more than 140.96 feet from shore but less than 200 feet from shore, permits the LMCD to adhere to its policy decision of preserving, as open water, areas of the Lake more than 200 feet from the sho~e. __The detriment ar~sina_ 200 feet from the shore is not so great t~at., under all of the facts and circumstances of thi~_s~.c_~a~e, their removal is necessary. 18. It is therefore ordered as follows: A.' The variance on the length of the Applicant's existing dockage'is granted out to a distance of 200 feet from the shoreline and is denied as to any of such dockage extending more than 200 feet from the shoreline. B. The side-setback variance along the easterly side of Applicant's dock use area is granted subject to the condition that, upon application of the owner of the property abutting Applicant's property on the east, and after notice and hearing, the Board may reconsider and may affirm, modify or revoke such side-setback variance after one year's prior written notice to the Board by the abutting p~operty owner. C. A 25-foot addition may be constructed at the outer end of the central dock, beyond the 200-foot line, for.~he p~ -5- fuel sales and related service, bu~ not for the storage of boats or rental of dock space. D. The variances herein granted are not to be deemed to confer any v~sted property rights to use the bed or waters of Lake Minnetonka; but the continuing right of the Public to .regulate such uses in the manner and to the extent authorized by l~w is A expressly reserved. 19. The memorandum attached hereto is made a part o~ the findings. Dated January 22, 1975' By order of the Board of Directors, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 'Frank Mixa, Executive..Director -6- CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTOR RE: 1987 ANNUAL PARKS DEPARTMENT REPORT PARKS DEPARTMENT 1987 ANNUAL REPORT PERSONNEL ROSTER The Parks Department has only one full'-time employee, the Parks Director. The rest of the staff is mad.e up of seasonal emploYees. During~ the busy ~spring, summer and early' fall, I have as many as ten full-time seasonal employees.' Also, between eight and ten part-time seasonal 'recreational program ~eaders,' twenty- one lifeguards and one contract c~eaning service. CURRENT Parks Director Jim Fackler July 1, 1985 Parks Maintenance Bob Johnson May 1, 1982 John Taffe May 1, 1983 Commons Maintenance To be Hired May 1, 1.988 Mowing Crew Heintz Proft June 1, 1985 Pat Cheney June 1, 1987 Tree Trust (2) Every June Dock Inspector Dell Rudolph May 1, 1983 Summer Recreation Program Super-to be hired April 88 Cemetery.Maintenance Howard Simar May 1981 City Hall Janitor Ser. Vernco Maint. Jan. 1, 1988 NON-RETURNING EMPLOYEES Summer Recreation Program Director Kelli Meyer City Hall Janitor Service PMS, Inc. Mowing Crew Andy Manthie 3 ~'~ An equal opporturdty Emplcyer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, nationa! origin, or handicapped status I! ! in the admission or access to, or treatment or e~ployment ~rL ~ts pro,rams a~,d activities. Parks Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 2 'PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT During 1987, the Parks Department was in year XII of the CDBG Block Grants. This grant provided $10,000 to be spent in low income neighborhoods. The parks that were located in these areas that need improvement according to the City of Mound Parks Update Study were: Whychwood Beach, Edgewater, Seton, Avon and Belmont. The improvements were as follows: 1. Picnic tables, benches and trash receptacles 2. Timber berms around play equipment, sandboxes and walls 3. Sand fill for sandboxes and berms 4. Tree plantings 5. Tree spade rental 6. Park Crew Labor $2,892.00 $2,143.00 $1,681.30 $1,776.00 $ 700.00 $ 804.~0 Total $9,996.80 These improvements were done by City Parks Crew utilizing the many talents that they have in landscaping and construction. Currently, the City is in the first year of a five year park play equipment replacement. There has been $22,500 allotted in the 1988 budget for purchase of equipment such as the play structure at Mound Bay Park. The intention of the Park Commission is to begin improvements at the neighborhood parks currently being used for the summer playground program an'd then expand to the other neighborhood parks on a need basis. These improvements will provide a visual commitment that the City of Mound has a dedication towards community development. Along with development, maintenance for the parks must be planned. Maintenance and upkeep of the parks is a major ingredient for their success. Regular mowing, leaf removal, litter pick up and periodic repairs are unavoidable aspects of these parks and generally take up the most man hours over the year. $35' Parks Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 3 SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAM In the past, the City of Mound has sponsored a summer recreation program that lasts six weeks, from mid-June through the end of July. A program supervisor oversees a schedule of events at five parks; Belmont, Swenson, Clover Circle, Highlands and Three Points, where there is a Park Leader and an assistant to carry out the daily program. The program was limited to arts an'd crafts and games suited for the younger children, ten years and under. Currently, the Parks Commission is looking into an expanded program for the summer of '88. This would be accomplished by co- sponsoring a program with Westonka Community.Services. The basic concept would be a program, still offered in the neighborhood park, but utilizing the Community Services special facilities, such as the indoor pool or gym, and co-offering events or field trips. This would be supervised by an intern from a university offering a major in Park and Recreation Programming. This intern would have responsibilities in other areas within the Community~ Services along with the Park Summer Program. This type-of a'pproach will offer a great deal of flex'ibility to a wide variety of age groups. The-programming will represent their special interests and allow 'for'expansion over the years. MUNICIPAL CEMETERY The Mound Cemetery was established in 1894 and operated under an association until 1944, when the cemetery was turned over to the City of Mound. There are three divisions, A and B are the old sections to the west and the new section, C, to the east. Currently, the grounds are maintained by a seasonal employee. He supplies his own equipment and is paid for time and machinery. The Parks Crew helps when requested for projects that are larger in nature than the daily upkeep. The fertilization and weed control is done through a contract with ProLawns Inc. In 1987, the City hired a tree contractor to trim all of the trees in the cemetery. This has enhanced the grounds by allowing better sunlight to the grass allowing better growth, while also giving better visual site from the road. Which is a deterent for vandalism. Park Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 4 The cost of operation of the cemetery is at a break even point 'with income from sales of plots. The charges for plots have not been updated since the mid 1960's, and need to be looked at in 1.988. The current level of maintenance at the cemetery needs to be up graded to aid in providing a more attractive setting which could be done through improvements such as irrigation. HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL As of December 30, 1987, the yearly total of hazardous tree removals was 68 on City Properties at a cost of $21,950. On an average, a tree is costing the City more in 1988 than in 1987 due to total removal of a tree, where in the past, on a vacant area, a hazardous tree was felled and left. The only removals were in areas such as boulevards or parks. And to the high cost of disposal of the tree and higher charges for the contractors insurance that has to be forwarded on to the customers. The' cost per tree in 1988 is averaging out around $300, where as in 1987, the cost was around $250. Diseased and hazardous trees are removed on a complaint basis. When a domplaint is received an inspection of the tree is done to determine the need o.f removal and the ownership. Cit'y owned trees are removed by a contractor as soon as possible, while private trees are removed in accordance with City ordinances~ Private trees not removed in the grace period allowed, are forced removed. The cost of a forced removed tree is billed to the property owner. If this bill is not p~id, it is then attached to their property taxes. COMMONS DOCKS The Commons Dock system is made up of approximately 4.5 miles of lakeshore, providing 400 dock sites. The Dock Inspector works under the direction of the Parks Director. His main duties are the processing of dock applications, inspections of the dock sites, notification of the discrepencies to permit holders and informational source for the general public and City. 1987 was the first year that the Commons Dock Program had been assigned its own division - Operating Statement - by objective. This allowed a concise look at the cost of the Commons Program and aided in setting a five year rate adjustment schedule to bring it to self supporting. In 1987, the largest line item in the Commons budget was for improvements. These improvements consisted of $29,000 for rip- rapping and $10,000 towards dredging of Jennings Bay. Park Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 5 The rip-rapping was completed with a contractor doing 1550 Ln. f~t. of shoreline and the City Crew doing 1495 Ln. ft. This rip rapping is part of a four year plan for shoreline protection. 1987 was the first year of the plan and dealt with the most critical areas. The entire Commons has been viewed to determine a priority for rip-rap work. This inspection is updated twice a year, spring and fall before the following years work to be done is determined. The most advantageous time to do this work is in the months of Janaury and February for a contractor and the City. This is due to being able to drive trucks onto the ice with materials to the work site, rather than the use of a barge. The cost per Ln. ft. is cut to less than half the cost during open-water months when a barge must be used. In 1987, we were working on two dredges, Jennings Bay and Black Lake Channel. The status of Jennings Bay is that we are holding quotes that came in under budget but have not proceeded to do the private dredge that needs to be done has not begun. I will hold' off until theirs is under way, because without it being done, the City's area would'not be accessible. Black Lake dredge came in under budget and will be- done in late January or February 1988. I am just waiting for the DNR Permit which had some information that needs clarification to the'Watershed District. CITY BEACHES The beaches are operated under a contract with the Westonka Community Services. The cost for 1987 is as follows: LABOR: Headguards - est. 900 hrs. ~$5.30/hr. Mound Bay Beach - est. 900 hrs. @$4.20/hr. 5 additional beaches - est. 825 hrs. ~$4.20/hr. Avg. $4,770.00 Avg. 3,780.00 Avg. 3,360.00 INSERVICE: Est. 200 hrs. ~$4.20/hr. Avg. 840.00 MILEAGE: Est. 1200 miles ~$.21/mi. Avg. 250.00 SUPERVISION: 50 hrs. ~$15.00/hr. Subtotal Administration Fee Avg. 750.00 $13,750.00 .2,062.50 Total $15,812.50 Park Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 6 These costs cover expenses incurred by Westonka Community 'Services in supplying lifeguards. They do not show the cost of maintenance, weed removal, bouys, portable toilets and life s. aving equipment. These come out of the Parks fund. DEPOT AND ISLAND PARK BUILDINGS The Depot building has been going through yearly remodeling. The financing of these improvements have been in part supplied by the City and government subsidies. Currently, there is still work that~needs to be done. Such as repair or replacement of exterior soffets and facia, deck on west end with an access into existing structure, south adjoining lower level patio area and miscellaneous small improvements. There are no funds available from outside of the City to do these improvements. So future budget requests will show an increase. Recently, we have done major repairs in a complete cedar shake roof, interior painting, floor covering, bathroom upgrading and exterior painting. The facility is being used for meetings of local organizations and for rental by private individuals ~for parties. Response from these users has been positive and they have made a point of it being an asset to the community. Future improvements at the Depot will be a benefit to the community. The Island Park building is also being used as a meeting place for local organizations and an occasional rental from the general public. This facility is currently being used as a storage area for supplies for Public Works. Only routine maintenance is being performed on this building. There is a need for updating, but use demand does not, at this time justify the expenditure. CITY HALL MAINTENANCE/JANITORIAL The Parks Department is responsible for some areas concerning City Hall maintenance and janitorial services. The grounds, lawn care and snow removal are seasonal, while responsibilities for heating/air conditioning are year round. All' projects within the capabilities of the Parks staff are performed. This has been in the areas of repairs to plumbing, heating and related equipment. Parks Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 7 Major repairs or cleaning services are contracted out through the d~rection of the Parks Department. Currently, we have a contract service for janitorial, carpet cleaning and looking into the heating and air conditioning system through an analysis from an engineer. Other projects have been assigned to the Parks Department as instructed by the City Manager. PARK COMMISSION The Park Commission is made up of seven members and a Council Representative. Their activities are related to all areas of responsiblities of the Parks Department. The main areas are: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Commons Dock programs and related concerns. Parks/Wetlands and related concerns. Cemetery. Island Park Hall and Depot Buildings. Swimming beaches and lifeguards. Hazardous tree removal. Summer Recreation program. Some of the areas 'that the Park Commission has reviewed in 1987 were: establishing the ripl rap-areas to be contracted for 1988; Commons maintenance permits involving timber wall,, stairs and landscaping; distribution of CDBG funds for park development; the Parks budget; proposed dredges; Commons docks added for updated map and the summer recreation program. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT Preventive, daily and unplanned maintenance of all related equipment is the responsibility of the Parks Department. Please note on page 10 the equipment inventory. The City mechanic provides assistance when a situation requires his skills, or another Public Works person who is skilled in the problem helps. Major overhauls or repairs where a specialized skill or equipment is involved is contracted outside of the City. An equipment replacement schedule is maintained to allow for updating of major capital outlays. Note yearly purchase breakdown on page 9. This schedule when observed, will allow the Parks Department to operate efficiently and provide safety for the general public and the Park Crew. Parks Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 8 PROJECTS COMPLETED IN 1987 BY CITY CREW 4. 5. 6. 9. 10. Fill, grading and seeding of Ridgewood access for Commons docks. Fill, grading and seeding of Crescent Park access for Commons Docks. Fill, grading and seeding for Kenmore Commons. Fill, grading and seeding for Waterside Commons dock access. Rip rapping of 1495 Ln. ft. of City owned shoreline. Installation of timber and sand berms around playground under CDBG funds. Construction of timber wall at Seton Park. Planting of 48 trees.in parks. Coordinate dredges for Black Lake and Jennings Bay. Installation of monument for dedication of flag pole at Mound Bay Park. 11. Installation of planter and bench at corner of Commerce and Lynwood. 12. Repaired multiple water run off areas caused by the summer storm. This included fill, rip rap, debris pick up and replacing of beach sand. These are just areas of special note in the operation of the Parks Department. The. year was consumed with the daily procedure of the Parks responsibilities. 1987 was a successful year with its highlight being the adoption of the requested 1988 budget. This new budget shows an active participation of the City of Mound in providing a progressive system. JF:ls Parks Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 9 YEARLY PURCHASE BREAKDOWN PROJECTED FOUR YEAR REPLACEMENT PROGRAM YEAR .1987 Utility Trailer 10,000 lb Skidsteer Loader Buoys~ Skating Rink Lights Tables - Depot 1988 Playground structures Tractor Cab Push mower -1 Weed whip -2 72" Mower Utility Trailer 50'00 lb. 1989 1 Ton dump Playground Structures 1990 Playground structures 3/4 Ton 4x4 Pickup with snowplow 1991 Playground Structures 3/4 Ton Pickup Total Total Total Total Total COST $3,000 16,500 700 1,800 250 $22,250 $22,500 4,000 300 550 13,000 1,800.. $42,1'50 $20,000 $42,500 $22,500 22,000 $44,500 $22,500 15,000. $37,500 Parks Department Annual Report January 27, 1988 Page 10 PARKS'DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT INVENTORY AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE CURRENT EQUIPMENT MODEL YR PROJECTED SERVICE REPLACEMENT REPLACEMENT YEARS COST 3/4 ton 4X4 FORD 1976 3/4 ton 4X4 CHEV 1982 1980 3/4 4 $20,000 4x4 snowplow 1 ton Pickup/dump 3/4 ton Pickup 1978 1989 ll 20,000 1980 1991 4x2 18 17,000 3/4 ton 1954 1990 36 22,000 1 ton 4x4 Pickup Ford 200 Tractor 1974 Front Loader 1974 Post Hole Digger 1974 1' & 2' augers 1974 Sickle Bar 1974 Mower Deck 1 974 Plow 1974 Cab Homemade wood 1988/Flail 15 9,000 1988/metal 15 4,000 Turf Blazer 60" mower 1979 1988 8 13,000 72" mower 1984 1992 8 18,000 1985 1988 8 550 1974 1984 1994 2,000 1968 1988 20 1,800 1961 74,84,86 1986,1988 3 300 Turf Blazer 72" mower Weedwhips-2 B~ushchipper Utility Trailer 2500 lb. Utility Trailer 2000 lb. Outboard Motor 10 horse Push Mower Skidsteer Loader Utility Trailer 10,000 lb 1987 1997 10 32,000 1987 1997' 10 4,000 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD ~dOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 January 26, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: Ed Shukle, City Manager & Mound City CouAcil Geno Huff Street Superintendent 1987 Annual Report The Street Department is responsible for alot of different jobs in our City, everything from Street Maintenance to 'staking out grave.s. That means we have to have a Very versatile crew'to handle the different projects. ! would like to take this opportunity to introduce you to our personnel. NAME TITLE STARTING DATE Eugene Huff Superintendent 1-1-60 Jerry Henke Equip. Operator & Maint. 7-5-65 Dick Johnson Equip. Operator & Maint. 4-25-72 Don Heitz Equip. Operator & Maint. 5-1-73 Tim Johnson Equip. Opera~or & Maint. 4-17-83 Greg Bergquist Mechanic 9-9-85 YEARS OF SERVICE 28 23 16 15 5 3 As you can see from our starting dates we have some experience. These employees know their jobs and tbey'regood at it. if there is any doubt, think about how many complaints you get on Street Maintenance. (very few) The administration of the Street Department is handled mostly by myself with help from fellow employees in the Public Works. I take all of the complaint and questions and try to solve them one way or another. Some of my other duties include reports(monthly and annual), budget prepartions, supervising personnel, evaluation reports, emergency call out, construction meeting, monthly meetings, project inspections, purchasing of equipment, purchasing of road material and etc. It's also my job to decide when, where and how the work will be done. Here is a list of some of the duties of the department for the repair and maintenance of 50 miles of streets, 11 parking lots and 20 cul-de-sacs. plowing & sanding sweeping clearing street right-of-May of brush and trees bituminous street patching preparing streets for seal,oaring transporting street materials street sign repairing and installation of new ones curb & sidewalks street lights retaining walls guardrails maintenance of equipment cemetery work repair & maintenance of storm sewer system Christmas decorations etc. GENERAL Let me go through the schedule of the Street Department for 1 year just touching on the main duties starting with Winter. SNOW & ICE CONTROL It's my job to determine when the snow equipment is called out. I depend on the National Weather Service for information concerning any weather systems moving in our direction, also the Police Department. Most of the time I'm out and about to determine what has to be done. ~en it's icy we sand as soon as possible but when it snows we like to wait until it's over, if we can, because of a 10 to 12 hour plowing cycle. After that long atime behind the wheel you're tired and we don't have any - 2 - backups. We have a 7 man crew for snowplowing, 5 from the Street Dept. including myself, the City mechanic and Greg Skinner, Water & Sewer Supt. The equipment used 5 - 2½ ton dump trucks equipped with plow, wing and ~sanders, 2 - 4 X 4 pickup trucks equipped w~th 8' plows. After the streets have been cleared and in good driving condition we have 7 miles of sidewalk to plow and haul the snow away. We use the blower and 3 trucks for the job, so as you can see when we get snow we are very busy. SPRING WORK The early part of Spring is when we do our street right-of-way work, that means we cut brush and trim trees that are hanging in the street. The Spring clean-up is a big job, 2 street sweepers, '1 sidewalk broom, 2 trucks and 1 tanker. We sweep everything in town, 50 miles of streets, 11 parking lots, 7 miles of sidewalk, 20 cul-de-sacs. You're looking at 3 to 4 weeks of work. This year in 87 we picked up 155 dump truck loads. From your spring clean-up work we move into our street patching. Our general street maintenance work isn't bad, we don't have alot of potholes and crack to repair. What takes the time and money is the repair of water- main breaks and frostboils. The main'breaks have to cut square-, compacted and repaved. In 1987 we had 11 breaks, ranging in size from 30' X 26' down to 8' X 8' and after these were repaired we had 3 frostboils to dig up, this is even more costly. A frostboil has to subcut 3' to 4' deep and the soil hauled away and replaced with Class 5 road material and repaved. STORM SEWER SYSTEM We have a very large storm sewer system to maintain. I don't know how many miles of pipe we have. I know we have 350 catchbasins and 75 sump catchbasins. The 350 catchbasins are cleaned after every heavy rain and the sumps are cleaned in the Fall. The City crew maintains and repairs the catchbasins, but when it comes to repairing the pipe itself we have a contractor come in for the work. We don't have the equipment or manpower to handle it. Depending om the weather, late Fall we use the vac-all and sweepers to start to pickup leaves, we never get the job done, there just isn't enough time before freeze-up. We got about half the town done this year. After freeze-up we move into our material hauling, salt & sand, rock, winter mix, sandfill, buckshot and Class 5. From this point we move back into the snow season. 87 STREET PROJECTS -RETAINING WALLS We had alot of trouble with our retaining walls again this year. We had Bjork Country Stone come in to replace 2 stone walls on Finch Lane in Three Points and 2 wood walls on Highland Blvd. The total cost wam$3,666.00. After the July 23rd, storm we had Bjork come back to repair 5 more walls that were damaged by the.storm. The total cost was $20,749.00 JULY 23RD STORM' This storm was called the storm of the century, I know that it gave us a lot of extra work and expense. To start out with our storm sewers aren't built for 10" to 14" of rain at one time and as a result we had some flooding, it wasn't because the catchbasins weren't open they just couldn't handle all the water. For the next 2 weeks we didn't do anything but clean streets, we used 2 sweepers, 2 trucks, front-end loader, water tanker and vac-all. .We. were fortunate to get reimbursed up to 90% of.storm damage from Federal Diaster Assistance, Thanks to John Norman. STORM SEWER WORK Because of the heavy rains in July we had more maintenance on the storm system than usual. We had a backhoe for 3 days just to dig out the open ditches. We had a mudslide at the end of Kildare which crushed the end of the storm sewer and filled the ditch, it cost about $1,5OO.OO to repair it. $U7 4 - SEALCOATING Our sealcoating program this year covered 1Omiles of streets and 6 parking lots. The preparation for this job takes al6t of time. The city crew does the patching and sweeping before Allied 'Blacktop Co. can shoot the oil and lay the rock~ we also clean-up the mess when their done. In 1987 they shot 42,519 gallons oil and layed 2000 tons of buckshot. GROVE LANE We had a problem with the drainage of the cul-de-sac on the south end of Grove Lane. When the contractor was building the houses in that area they had trouble locating the sewer stubs so they took a backhoe and dug behind the curbing in 4 different spots. The result'being that the curb and gutter settled taking the blacktop with it. To repair this we removed 265' of curb and gutter and replaced it, bringing it back to grade and overlayed the entire cul-de-sac with a blacktop mat. The cost was $10,562.00 for the job. TUXEDO BLVD. The part of Tuxedo that runs from Coudty Road 125 to Clyde Road' is one of our older street to maintain. The last few years it has been giving us some problems, as far as keeping it patched. This year we had some extra money because of the mild weather, so we decided to overlay as much as we could. We shot 550 gallons of tac and layed 280 tons of blacktop, after this was done it was sealed. It looks like a new street. CEMENT WORK We spent about $8,000 for some small jobs around town, such as new sidewalk and steps at City Hall, sidewalk at the Booster Station, 2 driveway aprons and some curbing. - -- 5 -- PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY We finally got a referendum passed for a new Public Works Facility, Thanks to our City Officials and employees who put alot of time and energy into this project. The referendum passed for $790,000. This ~money will be used for the purchase of the Riley Property and the building of a new building and remodeling of the exsisting Riley Garage. Even by keeping the Island Park Garage and Hall we will still be short of room, don't get me wrong I'm not complaining, anything is better than what we have now. This is a good start in solving a big problem. 1987 STREET BUDGET We started to work on 88 budget in June and it was OK'ed in October. The Street Department had a budget of $390,000 for 87, we came in under budget. We had a Capitol Outlay Budget of $18,900 for a new 4 X 4 Pickup with an 8' plow and 2 city radios. We got delivery of the truck in February. 1987 SHOPS & STORES BUDGET We had a budget of $50,81'0 for 87, we didn't make it, we went over by 3% or $1,798.65. The reason for going over budget is that we put out alot more work, starting outwDt~ the rebuilding of the 3 new pickup trucks to fit into our type of work, the sandblasting and painting of 2 dump trucks, 2 sanders and 2 snow plows also the repainting of a car. The money in this budget is used for the mechanic's wages and the operation of the City garage. We purchase tools and equipment, we also carry an inventory of parts, grease, oil, filterS, solvents, cleaning equipment, nuts, bolts, electrical supplies, we~ing supplies and ~any other items too numerous to mention. - 6 - I CIT5 of MOUND 53zt MAYWOOD ROAD t~,OUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 January 28, 1988 TO: Ed $hukle, City Macager & Mound City Council FROM: Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Superintendent RE: 1987 Annual Report Public Utilities for the City of Mound consists of 2 departments. One ' being Water Distribution and~the other being.~Sanita~y System. First' i would like to start with the Water DisTribution system. The Water Department has 1½ full time employees, which consists of a supervisor and 1 maintenance man. We sell water to approximately 3,178 customers within the City from 5 city owned wells, booster station,a combined storgae of 575,000 gallons in 3 water towers and approximately .45 miles of watermain. We are also interconnected with the City of Spring Park for emergency water if needed. EMPLOYEEES i have been with the City of Mound since 1977. I started out in the Water Department as a maintenance worker. In 1982 I became the Utilities Superintendent. I am responsible for maintaining an annual budget of approximately $300,000 for 1988, purchases, scheduling work loads, complaints, employee evalutions, water inspections for new construction, sight plan review for new construction and development, watermain and shut off lo.cation, monthly report to State agencies and safety. In addition to my administration responsibilities i also perform t~e same duties as :he maintenance personnel do in the Water & Sewer Department. Bob Shanley works full time as a maintenance man. Bob has been with the City since 1967. Bob's job consists of daily well inspections, meter and outside reader installations, repa~s and testing. As I have mentioned earlier we have approximately 3,178 accounts in which Bob reads 1/3 of these each month. This process takes 10 working days every month to complete. In addition he handles service calls which consist of turn-ons, turn-offs, final readings, valve maintenance and repairs, watermain breaks and occasional snow plowing. PUBLIC UTILITIES The Public Utilities are operated as a business. Revenues are generated from the sale of water, treatment of waste water, meter sales and service charges. Salaries and benefits are paid out of the revenue we receive. The Utility Department works closely with the Building Inspector and the City .Engineer on new construction, new development, utility upgrades or new installatign. This includes site and plan review and inspections along with discussions with developer.' There are 2 budgets prepared for Public Utilities. 1 for Water and 1 for Sewer. The Water Department has an annual budget of approximately $300,000 for 1988. The Sewer Department has an annual budget of approximately $650,000 for 1988. The percent of increase from year to year is small in both budgets as far as day to day operations go. History has shown that Workman's ComPensation, General Liability Insurance and MWCC have been the big reason for budget increases. Budget are prepared by the Utility Superintendent. The budget then goes to the City Manager for review and approval. Each budget is then presented to the City Council by the Superintendent, so the Council may ask any questions in regards to certain expenditures. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requires that the City of Mound have at least i full time employee with a Class C certificate in Water Supply System Operation. The City is also required by the PCA to have 1 person with a Class D certificate in WAstewater Treatment. Each person -- 2 .-- in the Water & Sewer Department has a certificate in either water or sewer or in both. The certificates have to be renewed every 3 years. Each employee is sent to schools at least every 3 years, in addition they are sent to various 1 or 2 schools, conferences and conventions. The purpose of this is to learn new up to date methods of maintenance, changes in laws and safety procedures. WATER DEPAR~'M~NT The Winter of 1987 was quite unusual, very few cold days and even less snowy days. Spring was very dry causing an increase of 7% more water pumped in the first 6 months of 1987 than in the first 6 months of 1986. The summer started out dry but in July things got pretty wet. The 2 big rain storms in July created some minor problems with our pumphouses. Well #1 was hit by lighting causing problems to the electrical panel nothing major. Well #7 our main well was down for 1 week due to the storm that hit us on July 26. There were quite a few basements flooded due to the storm. The reason was that our Lift Stations could not keep up with the flow. With all the extra flow into the sewers all of our sewer lines cleaned will have to repeated in~1988. Fall & Winter were pretty good, not to many cold or snowy days. This kind of weather reduced the number of watermain breaks. THAT'S GREAT!! In 1987 we pumped 297,926,000 gallons of water. This is an increase of 11.5% or 31,625,000 gallons over 1986. The last 6 years we have been trying to lower our percentage of unaccountable water. In 1981 we had a percentage of 24% unaccountability of water. In 1987 we lowered that percent to 6% unaccountable water. The '6% accounts for watermain breaks, fires, hydrant flushing, street sweeping, sewer line and wet well maintenance and tower' runovers. 1987 brought a few new changes for our pumphouses. The first was a new type of warning lite. In the past the warning lites at Well 4 & Well 7 were very difficult to see in the daylight hours. We have now installed a high intensity red strobe lite at the master control center on top of Well 6. This strobe can now be seen easily in the day and from a great distance. Also we have installed audible buzzer on Well 6 & 7 that goes off With the strobe light. In October we installed approximately 670' of 4" PVC drain pipe from the watertower on Chateau to the corner of Chateau and Fairview Ln. This pipe was installed to drain the altitude c~ntrol valve pit. This valve regulates the flow of water into and out of the watertower. It is a diaphragm type valve that is designed to leak at all times. In the past the water was pumped out of the pit and run into the garden behind the tower to the west. This was creating a problem with a resident's yard and basement on Fairview Ln. The State of Minnesota Health Department came out. This Fall for it's annual inspection of the water system. In the past the State had a point rating system to evaluate your water system. This system is not used anymore, now they make recommendations. I'm happy to say that the City received a good recommendation. There was a big push for the elimination of private wells. Jan and myself have been~working .on this,as of the end of the year we have sent out 19 letters to residents requesting ~hat 'they seal up these wells. Of the 19 notified 6 have complied. The biggest reason for sealing these wells is to prevent contamination to our water supply. The process is slow for enforcing this but we will continue to press on and find all the private wells and see to it that they are sealed up properly. As I mentioned earlier the Water Department has 3,178 accounts. This means that we have 3,178 shut off's. This winter we went over all our tie cards to check if we have measurements for all of our shut off's. The results were alarming, out of 3,178 we don't have measurement for 1,555 or 49%. We also checked on measurements for our 424 gate valves. The result weren't as bad, only 136 gate valves don't have measurements, that's approximately 33%. It is the City's responsibility to maintain the shut-off's and gate valves. In 1988 we will try to get as many as possible, but with the 1 maintenance person lost for 2 weeks every month reading meters it's going to be tough. With the new Public Works Building, the County Road 15 Street Project and new construction coming up in 1988 we will be kept plenty busy. In 1987 we had 78 new accounts and I am expecting at least that if not more for 1988. Our outside reader program is now down to 54 left to install. These last few are the toughest to get we'll keep trying. 1987 produced the least amount of watermain breaks (11) since we started keeping record back in 1975. There are 3 factors that contribute to this small amount of breaks. #1. We had a mild winter which kept the fro~$t at a reasonable depth. #2. Our ability to maintain a consistent main pressure. #3. Most of the bad mains already have broken and have a repair clamp on them. I have attached with this report month by month figures that make up a part of our daily work schedule. BUDGET For the~year 1987 the Water. Department came in under budget. for 1987 was $296,910, 89.7% of this was used. Budget SEWER DEPARTMENT The Sewer Department has 2½ full time employees. Damon Hardina has been with the City Sewer Department since 1974. Kivisto has been with the City Sewer Department since 1985. Scott Their duties consist of maintaining 29 lift stations and approximately 60 miles of sanitary sewer line throughout the City. Stations are checked 3 times a week. It takes 6 hours per day to perform these checks. We perform minor maintenance such as pump removal, seal replacement and electrical repairs. Any major pump repair is sent out. The Sewer Dept. has a truck with a crane so we can pull the pumps. We also clean the sewer lines in the summer. We have 1 water tanker with a jet cleaner and 1 sewer rodder to perform this cleaning. The men also help on water - 5 - main breaks and with snow plowing. My responsibilities for the Sewer Department are pretty much the same as the Water Department, except the annual bud~get is approximately $650,000 ~or 1988 of the $650,000 MWCC receives approximately 62% or $405,000 for 1987. Joyce Nelson is the Public Works Secretary and has been employed by the City since 1977. Joyce's job is to keep the office running smoothly and does an excellent job. She handles phone calls, complaints, all record keeping (work orders, invoices, report, inventory reports, monthly fuel quantities) typing, monthly water samples, she also runs the City's Recycling Program. 1987 for the Sewer Department was a busy year. Lots of repairs and maintenance. As you may or may not know the City has 29 sewer lift stations. These lifts date back to 1964 when the City Sewer was installed th.ru out Mound. Each year these lifts are costing us more to maintain. I have talked with John Cameron, the Cit~ Engineer about coming Up with a cost estimate over a 5 year span to upgrade the lift stations. I am hoping by mid-summer to have costs estimates completed. As for outside pump repair we had to send out 6 pumps for major repairs. This is up from last years figure. Major repairs consist of broken shafts, broken impeller, motor rewinding etc. This year we televised 4,000 feet of sewer lines that are located on easements, with most of these lines we. are unable to maintain with our sewer gleaning machines. The biggest problem that we encounter with these lines are roots collecting in the joints. We treat these problems with chemicals to dissolve the roots and then flush out the line. This year we had to replace 670' of 8" clay tile sewer line on the easement that runs between Bedford Rd. & Wilshire Blvd. In the past 4 years we have had 4 back-ups in this line. Televising showed us that we had about 100'. of pipe that had settled about 2". Also there were a number of cracked and offset joints. We replaced the old clay tile pipe with 87' PVC pipe. Sewer line maintenance for this year did not meet our goal for' footage. I was hoping to do 50,000 feet, we completed only 23,500 feet. For 1988 we will be trying to get an earlier start and a goal of 40,000 feet. Manhole repair for this year was tremendous. We repaired 24 leaky manholes, we also raised 20 manholes to grade. Sewer back-ups were down from 9 in 1986 to 6 in 1987. The budget in 1987 for the Sewer Department was $693,150, of this only 92.5% was used. - 7 - © February 9, 1988 RESOLUTION ~0. 88- RESOLUTION AUlliORIZING THE F~AYOR AND llIE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A PURCHASE AGREEMENT WIllt GERALDJ..XARNES, JR. AND REBECCA YARNES FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS PIB ~13-117-24 33 0067 (5440 LYNWOOD BLVD.) FOR A PRICE OF $70,000 WtiEREAS, property known as PID #13-117-24 33 0067, located at 5440 Lynwood Blvd. is for sale; and WHEREAS, it appears to be in the best interest of the City to en- ter into a Purchase Agreement for the purchase of this property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, MN. does hereby authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a Purchase Agreement with_Gerald J. Yarnes, Jr. and Rebecca Yarnes for the purchase of property descr'ibed as PID #13-117-24 33 0067 (5440 Lynwood Blvd.) for a price of $70,000. Purchase Agreement to expire on February 10, 1988, should the Council not approve purchase. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Minnesota State Depo ment of Agriculture AGRONOMY SERVICES DIVISION ~O WEST PLATO BOULEVARD SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA TELEPHONE: (&12) 296-&12~ NOTICE OF APPOIN~ENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR CITY OR TOWNSHIP " COMPLETE T~[S FOR~ ~ TRIPLICATE. c} INSTRUCTIONS ORIGINAL TO TEE ATTEWT~ON OF THE SECT~OW OF ~EE~ CONTROL AT F~BT COPY TO SECO~ COPY TO YOUR LOCAL CLERK. NAME OF PERSON APPOINTED James Fackler ' ADDRESS 5341Maywood Road CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE '. Mo'und, MN. 55364 .... '." TELEPHONE NO. [INCLUDE AREA 612-472-1155 - APPOINTMENT LOCATION - ClTY OR TOWNSHIP NAME ~. · ~ound COUIITY Hennepin DATE OF APPOIUTMENT 2-9-88 IN ACCORDANCE WiTH MINNESOTA STATUTES 18.2}1, PARAGRAPHS 2 AND ~, PERTAINING TO ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTORS, THE ABOVE-NAMED PERSON IS HEREBY APPOINTED TO BE ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FROM DATE INDICATED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE MAYOR OR TOWN BOARD WISHES TO TERMINATE THE APPOINTMENT. THIS APPOINTMENT CONFERS ON THE APPOINTEE ALL THE DUTIES, AUTHORITY, AND PRIVILEGES OF ANY LOCAL ~'EED INSPECTOR AS OUTLINED BY LAW. SICNAIURE (MAYOR OR CHAIR OF TOWNSHIP BOARPJ TITLE Mayor STREET ADDRESS 5341 Maywood Road AG-OD187-02 DATE SIGNED CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE Mound, MN. 55364 January 26, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. ~88- RESOLUTION RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO 1}lE STATE AND REQUESTING 1-HE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LA~DS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOIltING LANDS WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the Department "of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain lands within the City have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City. of Hound has a number of tax parcels which do not comply with the City's zoning ordinance and building codes because of a lack of minimum area, shape, frontage, access problems, or the parcels contain nuisances or dangerous conditions which are adverse to the health, safety and general welfare of residents of this City; and WHEREAS, the City was instrumental 'in obtaining legislation which could allow said Parcels to be withheld from public sale and sold at a non,. p~bl.ic sale to eliminate nuisances and dangerous conditions and to increase compliance with land use 6rdinances and Minnesota Laws of 1982, Chapter 253, Article 39,..Sect. 6 was adoptgd to provide said authority to .the City and the County; and WHEREAS, a specific list df tax forfeited lands ha~ been provided the City and the City wishes to restrict and condition the sale of certain lands to bring them into conformance with City ordinances and land use goals; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of f.orfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is returned to private Ownership pursuant _to Hinnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M.S. 429.07, Subd. 4; M.S. 435.23 and H.S. 444.076); and .. WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since for- feiture shall be included as a separate item and. added to the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold (M.S. 282.01, Subd. 3). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hound, Hinnesota: '. The County Board is hereby requested to impose conditions on the sale of the following described lands, and is further requested to sell such lands only to owners of lands adjoining at a non-public sale so that said lands will be combined for tax and land use purposes and will comply with City ordinances and regulations: A. PID #30-117-23 22 0028 - Lot 17, Block 4, Devon January 26, 1988 PJEASON FOR AND CONDITIONS TO BE IMPOSED SPECIALS LEV~ED BEFORE FORFEIllIRE LEVY ~ . AHOUNT Undersized lot to be 3180 sold only to and 3388 combined with adjoining 3397 properties 204 ..40 282.10 160.94 SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE.FORFEITURE LEVY ~ AMOUNT NONE The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to the County imposing the aforestated conditions and the lien of special assessments on said lands. The City of Mound is releasing the above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained by the City of Mound. The foregoing resolution was'moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers..voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk ~ 1 0~( ~1 3NON~O~ 0 0 February 9, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88-" ~ . RESOLUTION RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the Department of' Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain lands within the City have been fonfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has a number of tax parcels which do not comply with the City's zoning ordinance and building codes because of a lack of minimum area, shape, frontage, access problems,'or the parcels contain nuisances or dangerous conditions which are adverse to the health, safety and general welfare of residents of this City; and WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining legislation which could allow said parcels to be withheld from public sale.and sold at a non- public sale to eliminate nuisances and dangerous condi.tions and to increase compliance with land use ordinances and Minnesota Laws of 1982, Chapter 253, Article 39, Sect. 6 was.adopted to provide Said authority to the. City and the County; and WHEREAS, a specific list of :tax forfeited' lands has been provided the City and the City wishes to restrict and condition the sale of certain lands to bring them into conformance'with City ordinances and land use goals; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the. property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M,S. 429.07, Subd. 4; H.S. 435.23 and M.S. 444.076); and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since for- feiture Shall be included as a separate item and added to. the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold (H.S. 282.01, Subd. 3). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hound, Hinnesota: The County Board is hereby requested to impose conditions on the sale of the following described lands, and is further requested to sell such lands only to owners of lands adjoining at a non-public sale, so that said lands will be combined for tax and land use purposes and will comply with City ordinances and regulations: February 9, 1988 PID ~24-117-24 44 0066 - That part Of Lot 24, Block 6, Arden, cording to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.0 feet northerly of and parallel with the following described line: £.ommencing at the southeast corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range 24; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 a distance of 270.86 feet; thence East 100.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence northeasterly 185.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 286.48 feet' and a central angle of 37 degrees, and there terminating. REASON FOR AND CONDITIONS TO BE IHPOSED Undersized lot to be sold only to and' · .combined with adjoining~ properties SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE LEVY~ AMOUNT NONE SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE_FORFEITtiRE LEVY # A~OUNT 7513 $338.00 The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release~ the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to the County imposing the aforestated conditions and the lien of special assessments on said lands. The City of Mound is releasing the above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained by the City of Mound. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk avoa' N "g J 'NOA~ CITY OF HOUND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YEAR XIV (1988) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that Hennepin County and the City of Mound pu~rsuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, are sponsoring a public hearing on Tuesday., March 8, 1988, at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban County housing and community development needs, Urban County Statement of Objectives and the City of Mound's proposed use of its Year XIV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant planning allocation of $61,789. For additional information'on proposed activities, level of fund- ing, program objectives and performance, contact the City Manager of the City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN. 55364, 472- 1155 or the Hennepin County Office and Planning and Development at 348-6418. The public hearing is being held in accord with the Urban Hen- nepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement 'pursuant to MS 471.59. City Clerk Publish in The Laker February 22, 1988 For February 9, 1988 Council Meeting 'February 4, 1988 LICENSE RENEWAL -- Expire 2-28-88. New License Per'iod 3-1-88 to 2-28-89 Approval contingent upon all required forms, insurance etc. being turned in. Garbage Disposal Blackowiak & Son Dependable Services Westonka Sanitation Woodlake Sanitary Cigarette A1 & Alma's American Legion #398 (Jude Candy & Tobacco)~ Ben Franklin Bob's~Bait .Shop Brickley's Market Duane's 66 (Jude Candy & Tobacco) Fina Serve Jock Club Meyer's Mound Service Mound Municipal Liquor (Jude Candy & Tobacco) PDQ Food Store SuperAmerica Station Thrifty Snyder Drug Westonka Foods Union 76 VFW #5113 (B & L Vending) I BILLS ...... FEBRUARY 9, 1988 Batch 8013 Batch 8014 33,521.39 88,458.90 "TOTAL BILLS 121,980.29 370 [;ATE STATUS 2/!)3/82 2/03/F::_:: PRE-PAiD ~! '-'-'1 w,., z./ .,~,/v,-., 379,65 LiQ a.-.-.o., JRHL-CD . BELLSOY CORPSRATiOH VE~DOR TOTAL 616.72 BC~80 PRE-PAiD 906.58 %1.08 2/03/88 2/03/88 !,867.66 BILL CLARK OiL COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL !867.66 ul~l i PRE-PAiD /u..,/o8 2/03/E~', DEBRA THOMPSON V~DOR TOTAL D1219 PRE-PAID 2/03/88 2/03/88 DS, BERT RUDOLPH VENDOR TOTAL E1429 PRE-PAiD 2/03/88 2/03/88 ED PHiLLiPS & SONS VENDOR TOTAL F1538 PRE-PAiD ~/,-p~o~ 2/03/88 F~NN iNFORMATI~4 SYSTEMS V~DOR TOTAL GASOLINE 60.00 MiCROFiLM 60.00 J~;NL-CD 60. O0 34.00 4 ........ ~ cuN~K~o, HOURS 34.00 JRNL-CD 34.00 E~)1,25 L~Q 111.66 £ig ' 13.75J DiSC 699.16'JRNL-CD 699.16 6,050. O0 6,050. O0 6050.00 COMPUTER HARDWARE JRRL-CD ~-t-,~ · Gi'77'2 rD~:-PAtD EFJ5.48 6.25- DISC ,..~0 FRT ~ .,,,/ .... 2/0:)/88 304.63 GRiGDS COOPER & CO~?ANY -~,nn ........ 304.63 H2091 FEE-PAiD 26.25 POhTiAC MA~'~UAL 2/03/88~,c' A')~. -,i::',',~- _ ~,D'"'. ~...": JRNL-CD ~= ~ T,~F. VD;DON ..... 2A;2~ ; ~, :~,-. :,; .... ~.~r; 69.40 ':' ~';~/::::' '?/fi'~,,'c'F; ,.,~.~l:~ 'C .JR?~L-CD ~,c',"~??/;:';D,..., .... ~/.o/c,o 15'2.00 7i-71©0-95i0 01 - 15'50-0000 01 - 1250- 0000 1010 Ol-,o5O-~lOu !0!0 71-7!00-95!0 71W~00-9520 71-71.00-9560 IOlO ~-4170-5000 I0!0 7t-7100-9520' 71-7!00-95~0 71-7!00-9600 !010 0!-4270-4110 01-4~40-1400 10!0 !OlO 3?9.65 2802 60.00 34.00 '2;302 699.16 2802 6050.00 2802 3(~,. 63 2802 2~. 25 £802 57. =1 ' i,:)-' 192.00 ,.;,.':.i-'4 TA?FF ' V:!ir':R TOTA~ i'P2. J£579 477.26 LiO 800.22 Wi~;E 17.56- DiSC 1,25~.~2 JRNL-CD 71-7100-951<; 71-7!00-$520 71-7100-95S0 i010 PRE-PAiD 21.50 DIRECTORY 43.00 JR!<L-CG 01-4040-2200 0i-4!F0-2200 1010 43,00 PRE-PAiD 2/¢:~/~R ........ "~ 150.00 LNr rp~r-cuv rjr' ,rc~ 150.00 JD&-CD 0!-4020-41i0 i010 45.00 NEW OFICER CONF 45,00 01-4020-41i0 1010 45,00 ", LE~,>'_~_ OF MN CITIES YENDOR N2'791 PRE-PAiD ', .-' lt;~/,:,o 2/03/8~ ~,'=~ L~: TOTAL 238,00 150.00 MACTA CONF. 150.00 JRNL-CD 01-4030-4120 10i0 !50. O0 FRE-F'AID 1,000.00 ...... r , E., L .......~ 60-6~!i.:':.:-.:::::00 2/03/88 2/0:3/88 i,000.00 JRi4L-ED i010 NEFF:iLL',_t "~* ' REALTY ~H TOTAL 1000.00 000. (ii) ~I~RO ECSU VE~iDL'~ TOTAL 25,00 M3337 F'RE-PA.'. D .... :' 00' :.=:E,,,~'~'m:',=., ,,.,_,,~.~, ,,,, JUV E~ 0t-4140-4130 2',"'~ "?' _ ..... 1010 / j,, /,:,,:, .-., ir.,,:~ l:::-: 5,00 JF:~L-CD NN JU'gENiLE urr~C:n.: ~S, VB;DOR ,0 ~ .:/!.,3 / S.:, VE:.r_iSR TOT~ N~/~{,D FOST~ASTEF: 5,00 7,3-73fi0- 32!0 ~ ;5' l ~iUV-.:, .2 ~ 0 1010 ' 25.,"..:0 5.00 : !:::'. 24 2;.:: 679.50 !3i,36 FEF:A 1/23F'R 192, ?'2 F'ERA :/23F'R 72.37 F'EF:A !/23FR 371 o: ,,.,? I 53.30 "c' 32 143o~ ..... '"'"" 2/0:?/L:.3 .... F' ~,'~ / ?.3 f .::,:, , . ,:,~ F' E R A VENDOF: TOTAL "' ...... .,2!~71 = .... tn - - ,. ;-~.~ tH.., 761 15, ':' '2/03 f,.-?.8 2/03/8::-: 752,4:? 7.:,.~ -. ~LIT';' .... u~N~ & SPiRiTS V,-l~uw; .........TOTAL ....'.4Y S4479 PRE-PA ~ D 12,6¢5.00 ................. =4.;0,) PRE - PA i D 2/03/L::::: 2i0:?/83 ...... :.,,,,v VEV::iOR S4,::30 FR£-P~iD 340.91 163,26 397,23 · 154.60 ?4,18 ~...,,,. '"t, ..J ."' 253.72 ot ,".,t 4.35 3~. 27 6.05 2F¢72, I4 555. i 0 ., · ,/0 633,7i 633.71 57. ?3 -":' T9 276,2'? 22,00 .... "50 I'IY, '22, :::i0 O~~, 7,3 6 .:, · "f .-', ,:, -~, _"~ [:ESCF::?TzCN PERA l/2::-:FF; PERA i F'ERA i ..... F'ERA F'ERA i/%FR PEF,~ i/23PF: JRNL-CD LiQ DISC JRNL-CD A/P 88 CHEV CELEB JRN,. -CD FICA-!/23FR F'ICA;1/23PR F!CA-l123PR FICA-1/23PR 'FICA-1/23PR Fi~-I/£~PR FiCA-1/23PR FiCA-1/23PR FiCA-i/2$?R FICA-HSD 1/23PR FICA-~ED 1/23PR JRNL-CD A/P NOV /F' '~" A/P BATTERIES jRNL-CD ,_:AN [;--_NTAL JAN [,'D~TAL PRE~ JAN DENTAL JAN DD~TAL FF:E~ JAN Z,P:TAL JAN [C~;TAL F'RE;fi J~N E:E;;T;L 0!-423:0-i~0 0!-4i70-!440 01-4140-1440 01-470-1440 01-4040-1440 0i-4070-1440 0!-1340-1440 10i0 7!-7!0':)-75i0 71 .~ ~ nn_,"..= ~ ", , · ~ lv'g' I010 01-2040-0000 1010 73-7300-1440 78-7800-1440 71-7100-1440 01-4~?0-1440 01-42~0-1440 01-~0~v-1~0 0i-40~0-1440 01-4340-14~J 0!-4020-1440 7i-7i00-1440 10!0 01-2040-0000 73-2040-¢003 !010 01-4040-!510 0!-4070-!510 0!-4!40-!510 0i-470-15!0 0!-4340-1510 01-4! 70-!510 73-73(:0-1510 78-7300-15i0 71-71C0-:51:, F'F:---FAiD .310:-':. 30 752. 12695.00 20'~2.14 2.:0.~:/::;: ...... ' ' - ..... :":-' TT<.AL:.--LEF~S INSURANCE CO ',,:E?i~.£~? TOTAL :-':'.'.'A.;~O · ZE, OS:]-: F'RE-F'Ri [i 27.27 ~ v,--,, t,:.,-, :' m~- ;~'~ 27.27 .............. ~';i~m~:, TOTAL 27.27 dY,:~iL- C£ JRNL-CD 27.27 CITY,_,,n: MGL:~.ZI 2/04/88 ~OUNT 15.65 8.00 16.05 o.~.11 5.37 2.68 2.6? 2.?2 2.69 I~4.-~ 38.11 ~1.10 51.03 ~6.~0 L~Ea, Gr'~.t;- I .'.UAl OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUFPL!ES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE o~': ~,~-~ OFFICE SUPPLIES C~FICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES . A/P CABINET-PAPER MINUTE BOOK FILLERS A/P CHAIR-SHREDDER A/P MEMOS JRNL-CD 0!-4040L2100 0i-4090-2100 0!-4i70-2i00 01-4340-2100 01-4280-2!00 71-7100-2100 73-7300-2100 /o-~ouv-z!uO 01-~040-0000 01-4020-2~00 0!-2040-0000 01-2040-00CG ' 20~J ACRO-MN VENDOR TOTAL 926.20 A0100 G '~. /,DO ~ q c~ ~lu4,,.~ ~/u4/o~ 6:~ 20.45 9.45 4,68 4.6~ 14.85 '?.45 '14,85 !71,00 FEB CONTRACT FEB CONTRACT FEB CONTRACT FEB CONTRACT FEB CONffRACT FEB CONTRACT FEB CONTRACT FEB CONTRACT FEB CDtTRACT - JRNL-CD 01-4280-3~50 01-4~0-~0 01-41~0-3~50 01-42S0-3~50 01-4140-3~50 01-4040-3~5~) 73-7300-3~50 78-7800-3950 22-4t70-3~50 2040 ' AIR COM~ iNC VD~DOR TOTAL' 171.00 A0375 2/04/88 2/04/88 110.00 ANTI GLARE~.~,.~erc'~° 110.00 A/P ANTI GLARE SCFFEENS ~0.00 JRNL-CD 01-40~5-2100 01'2040-0000 2040 ARCHIVES CORPORATION VEND~ TOTAL c~O,O0 B0540 2/04/88 2/04/$8 30.00 JAN OXYGEN 30.00 JRNL-CD 01-4270-225~J 2040 BATHKE COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 B0550 2/04/88 2/04/:::8 57,66 A/P DEC MDSE 57,&$ JRNL-CD 22-2040-0000 2040 B~.~ FRAI;KLIN STORE TOTAL 57.66 BO600 2/04/:.-'::3 2/04/88 32.50 dAN GARBAGE 45.25 JAN GARBAGE :2:2..50 JAN GAR.Z. AGE 2,~,.00 JAN-FEB GAF:BAGE 1::':6.25 22-4170-3750 71-7i00-375.) 01-470-3754 0'I-4280-3750 2040 !36,25 2/04/:.-';:.:; 763.24 JAN SALT '~A'" ",' JR~:L-CD 2040 pUp. tx HA S-- C6::30 CASH REGISTER SALES C0860 TOTAL VENDOR TOTAL 2/04/88 2/04/$8 CnN:{n,S=r.,~ VET~:iNARY C0921 CITY OF PIPESTONE C0940 CLEAN STEP RENTAL C0960 YENDOR TO, ~L 2/04/88 V~DOR TOTAL 2104/80 2104/88 VENDE~ TOTAL o COAST TO COAST C0970 COCA COLA BOTTLING C0970 COM?UTOSERVICE INS Ci0!0 /..,~/oo 2/04/88 V£NDC~ TOTAL ~/O~/&, ~/:4~,..~ 2/04./:E:8 2i04/::':8 v:~D~n TOTAL 2i04/:2:3' Ci0'31 2/04/:-30 2104108 CONTEXT SYSTE% ASS2Z:ATES V~CC.E'. TOTAL i:A2.24 39.17 TAF'ES-ROLL£R ....... ~,F, dL-cD 39.17 o0.~ A/P BAL Duc-n=X :XM 60,36 JRNL-CD 60. :36 15.00 ::;8' CCI USBR DJ~"r~' 15.00 JDdL-CD 15.00 20.24 ~.~ RUG noN7 34.68 JAN RUG RENT · ~4. ~z JRNL-CD 54.~ 19.45 ~£PA!R SUPPLIES 17,D .SUPPLIES 1.79 MEASURE'CUP 1.~ KEYS 35.00 SUPPLIES 26.34 PLUu=-FI~= 3.39 CLEANER 3.76 BATTERYS 108.44 JRNL-CD 108.44 ~..,,7Z &qN MiX 55.72 1,019,40 UB ,~urF~-1~oo 159,00 BOM;~U~Ic,~TIU~o-1 1,178.40 JRNL-CD 1!78.40 ,o.o,. PAGER REPAIR 16,0S 6RNL-CD . !6.05 150. C,O JRNL-C:: 150.00 71- 7 ! 0:.]-2200 2040 Fi i .'?F}J, fl_ f'~f'~¢tO 2040 2<:40 0!-4320-4210 /1-7,~,0-~10 2340 01-432~-3800 0D4.320-2200 01-4020-2200 · 01-4340-2200 01-4280-2300 01-4290-2310 73-7300-21C0 78-7800-~00 2040 7t-7i00-9540 '2046 01-4095-3800 Ol 5~040 '??-,4 '~ 7Q- ;'.JO. ! NVUI~,,'" ,u~ I .'" ,~n~,,x DATE STATUS F'UF;CHASE CiTY DF hOJ,';D ACCOUH7 NL:;iEER FEE-PAiD Cli00 COPY DUPLICATING PRODUCTS VD4DOR TOTAL D1200 DAY DISTRIB'JTING CO VENDOR TOTAL 01240 DEF'ENDABLE SERVICES 2/04/88 2/04/88 VEN[(;R TOTAL D132~ 2/04/88 2/C,4/88 DONALD BRYCE VENDOR TOTAL D1340 ~/04/oo 2/04/E~ DRIVER & V%H!CLE SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL E14~ EAST SIDE BD¢ERAGE E1430 ED"~¢~2 SHUKIF F1641 FLAHERTY"S HAPPY TYM~ F1690 2/04/88 2/04/88 VB.4DBB TOTAL 2/04/:~ 2/04/~ VD4D~R TOTAL 2/04/88 2/04/88 v:..J',.,~,~ TOTAL 2/04/8::': 2/04/88 Fu~: STAR ~,~ :,~, r VEN£:FJR TOTAL Gl'800 ~/..,-t/,:..~ 2/U'4!:::_,' OARY"S DIES~, SERVICE VD4~:C,R TOTAL 16.80 d,~,i COF'iER 16.80 dRNL-CD 16.80 2,299.37 JAN BEER , o~,~ ~v JRNL-CD ~99.37 47,00 d~'J GARBAGE 47.00 ~NL-CD 47.00 417.00 JAN CHIEF PAY 417,00 JRNL-CD 417.00 50.60 36.05 21.50 26.~ i34.50 134.50. 2,834.40 2834.40 90.7:3 7.75 98.53 3.90 3.90 3.90 44.78 156,04 156.04 66.,? 66.17 VEHICLE LICENSES 88-90 ~EHtCLE LICENSES 88-90 VEHICLE LICENSES 88-~0 V~HICLE LICENSES 88-90 JF~-CD' JAN BEER JRNL-CD CALCULATOR MTG EXP ' JAN MiX JRD~-CD 73-73C0-:.:.?.5{~ 2040 7t-7! .~O- r,,._',U 2040 0I-4¥-"0-:::70':) 2040 2~-4170-!370 2040 01-4280-4140 01-4340-4140 78-7800-4140 73-7300-4140 20m3 7!-7i00-9530 2040 01-4040-210.3 0i-4040-4!20 71-7100-')540 2040 ,1-71vv-~wO 71-7100-7550 2040 01-42C-;0-2:~ !0 2~740 VEg'CF: TOTAL 2/04/::%:: 2/04/88 G~ND HAVEN BRASS FOUNDRY VD~[!CF; TOTAL H2020 Q t" ~ I':,r', ", 'A-~ :,-.,', ,u /,J~t l u,a £1 '."ti ,'-,0 HPP¥'S POTATO CHIPS t~=x:r,r,r.,.,~.,,~,~., TOTAL, , . H2 i 2/r;i/~:',::: 2/04/88 H~4N CD CHi~ OF POLiCE-PT VENDCLR TDTAL H2i60 TOTAL 2/04/8-3 2/04/83 J2440 ,J'B DiSTRi_;UTi!,;G K267{~ 2/04/~.";8 2/04/8::.', .w ,..'~,' .... 2/04:¢88 VEN:'~OF: TOTAL L2750 A;:',2,7~ ,.7-:hL-C[i 6E:2.7:.;' 208,33 i ?3.75 ........ I .- ..',, 70 72.16 dAN MiSC 72.16 72.16 770. O0 70;,,25 -Air' 705.25 JFiNL-CD 7(6.25 60,rio :.:',8 DUES IS. FSi 60.00 JF;NL-CD 60,0() 42.10 r. ........... ' 42.60 JRNL-C?.: 42.60 3,3!8.00 JRNL-CD '70.00 2 % A/'P [SC rELi'.,::~:' CE~ 73-7:20!5- 2:::':':6' 2.::: 40 7i -7i00-9550 2:')40 0i-4!4':)-41 !0 2040 ri f-Z(4-':) 2040 2040 Oi - 429:'i-".-'?-%r~ 2040 [.ii -~o ~t'.. -~. 2C40 73-2040<. 7i-10.;0 c.': 1-20:0-'1 itl'? L O L3: S VEi'q,:'.CL;, TOTAL L275:, .?,,'ha/:~::: 21041E:E.' M3030 2 / 04/:.:".;~ 2/04/::;:_:; ~'¢'~':" VII DiSTRiBUTOR ,,,,r,,, ',.':~'~.,.,r, TOTAL M3130 ~ETRO AREA f~GMT ASSN VENDOR TOTAL M3150 · ~ ¢0~/c,,:, 2/04/88 DiETF;O FO~iE CO~F,U~4iCATiO?4S VE~iDOR TOTAL ~3i51 2/04/'S8 2/(;4/88 ~ETRO GARA6E DO~R CO VENDOR TOTAL M3!70 .-, .-,. ,,-,r, ,'/'.:4/,:,.-:, ,'iET~;O ~ASTE CONT.'RCL C~3~i~l~ VDC~GR TOiAL 2/04/':'-:3 2/'04/::.~ i'IK':!;EOASCO VEHE;CF: TOTAL ?132:37 2/'04/'S;:.', ti:'.',:.:: :, I 2/01/::::-:: 2/04/L:::.:: ;-:.:.~ C~::XE ?F,E':,:~4T;J E-.--iCF, S ~ ~/Ei4E. C:F; TOTAL ~:i4'FO i6.80 620.16 620. !6 C'£L . LO 5,2.'.::0.85 5,230.85 10,00 I0.00 20. O0 20,00 'l', 54.::;8 54. ~64,75 164.75 164.75 33,736.17 7,719,84- 753.32- 25,263,01 25263.0i · :,C,'T ,"~J 455.3! 2-~5.75 ~ I --.::-.,,, 27 1138.27 !06.95 '? "/ ~ I; '; 3, ~',76,'.:-5 ..',,:, / ?-,. 7..~ 50.00 50. O0 50. 4, :.::::.5, JA~4 BEER ~A~A MTG JRNL-CD REFAiR DO,JR .,.iRf4L-CI) FRS SE;ER SERVICE FEB SE~ER SEW:CE FEB SEWER SERVICE JR~L-CD JAN jAN GAS JR~L-CD GAUSE-SHELL ;-::;::: L!:--S-DiCFCA jR):L-CD 2:? 4:) 71-71i.':0-'75:.% 2040 0!-4040-4t30 01-4040-4120 2040 V 1 - 4 ~ ~U" '-: :. ;~0 2o:0 co'.~40 78-7S00-4230 78- i 1'.;'0-0000 i O-C,C I £- t:V!JV 2040 0i-4230-3720' 73-7300-3720 78-7800-3720 22-4170-2270 22-4 t 70-:::E:20 · t'" * ,F*~'~,~;, ,_ LE¢:GLE OF CITIES .... v =; 4~,c~,?" TOTAL 7¢,:4/ ..... 2i04/;-8 Nur,~H~Ud~ STATES POWER CO Vz:C~ur; TOTAL F'3751 2/04/88 2/04/L:::-] F'F F'ETTtSLqi";E & E~] VEN[:CR TOTAL 2/04/,'.:,'L:: ...... " PA?AS~N ELECTRIC CF~ ............ " .... P~J00 2/04/:?.L:: P4002 P4(i29 PHYLLIS JESSEN VEi'¢i[~E 70TAL P4060 FO,_,,r,=~ [ii:-',TRiE:UTi)iG CO VD4ECF; TOTAL n, ,~.,~i I 556.00 5!' 8,00 508.00 508.00 i2! ,57 76.88 1~o.4... 1,o.4u 42.I4 207.55 583,47 ~':'~ 47 200.00 200.00 2,705.'?0 2,705.~0 73.23 73.23 ~i..5.22 jE~'&-CD A/F' r ' .... ~"~ JRNL-CD dRNL-CD A/P REBUiLD'TiHE CLOD( JAN MIX- J~NL-CD A/P TSF' CD?~S%T A/P CCXF EXP u,~ ,¢4L ~LI JAN ~EER JRXL-CD 22-4170-.31 01-4020-4 ~ 30 40 - 2040 - 0 {:, ,:; 0 78 - 20 ~ 0 - 0000 2040 0 i - 2040 - 0000 2(40 01-2040-0~:;00 2040 71-7!FK>753¢ 01 - 4280 -22,).:) 3f o R4';'90 RON'"S ih= Uu~.r~;M R4:310 2 .' 04/',:73 2/04i:73 2/04/$8 · ~.:,,,.;, TOTAL ROYAL CROWN BEVE~GE VENDOR TOTAL S4352 2/04/8:3 2/04/8:3 S&NITARY PRODUCTS COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL S4:370 SH&=;E S4370 c~mm ~,? P~ZA S4410 2'"C'~ ;':"~ 2/04/S=3 VEN[,F_~ TOTAL ¢oo TOTAL · .' !d4/,:,., TOTAL 15(,0~ dAN ASS7 CHIEF 150.'::;0 JRNL-CD 150. cio · .,7.,.,U JAN ICE 57.~0 '~ 57.60 8'2.00 jAN MiX 82.00 ~NL-CD 82.00 488.50 dRNL-CD 488.50 2673.08 160.50 *'~ ='¢'"~-" 180.00 REPAIR 340.50 JRNL-CD · E~O. 50 106.60 iNSPECTION NOTICES :30.20 ~;USi.,NESS CARIES · :", '"ri o :c:~:'='~' C,~.'_-!S !67.00 JF:NL-CD !67.00 S4570 ..... ,~ ..... -~ S¥'LVA?~iA E:ULE:S 2 / 04,::.::8 ~/" ,,-,~,~,;zc.,:,,~... .*.5.54 ~:,~'~'~'~, - u~' S45'..;'0 ,':.:7'? . (:0 PUMP ;:E?AiR PER BiD 2/04/E:--: 2/!.%i::':3 E:7'.~.00 ,.,~.r'?,L-"r~. =, :, :,.o ,,:LL CC;:PA:,f. :,.E)CSi TOTAL $7:?.00 .... '"' %.5? iNTAKE ~:=r, r .:<',':z: ::..,.. £,',)4/..: i 7.6..;". er.:,=-,_;,'- ..... 22-4170-1 :.::70 1::.':,0 7!-7 i O0 -'..:. 540 2%0 2{"4',:~ 7i -7.i 71-2040-0000 0!-2040-00C~ 0i-42'70-2330 73-7300-2!20 7:?7500-2200 Fi 1 - ~' '-";'Fi-'??' 'x3 7:3-7300-4200 2040 73-7.'.":00-23,>0 2 ::: :: STF:EiCH--F:"S c~ ':':;' CYCLE T4730 THE LAKER T~1770 TOTAL '.2','0 &':.::8 2/04A::3 2/04188 VENDF_~; TOTAL THORPE D!STRI~UT!NG CO YEXOOR TOTAL T~?~O 2104/;~: 2i~4/88 THF:!FTY SNYDER DRUG NO4 VDJDOR TOTAL 74850 T4'780 CiTY ....'": " .... nu,'i~ JU~U: ~ 2/,)4/:J8 2/C4/',:::-3 u:~r,n-. TOTAL VEN[~G~ TOTAL 2/04/:"8 '"'"-" TO%L Y ¢., ,2"..; 7, . . 7.67' '"" '"= F, AND .:,,..?.., bur r 5 34,75 dF;XL-CD l,r)~O.O0 dAN RECYCLE !,050.00 JR~&-CD 14)50.00 56.76 A/P LEOAL NOTICES 30.28 ,~:.MTIOi~ f-~uI ilia_ ',.::7,04jRNL-Ci'~ 8%04 5,621.Y:, ..JAN 562i.45 ~o.=, PICTURES 26.24 .JR~L-CD 26.24 21.00 JAN MiSC 2!.00 JENL-CD 21.00 25.08 2:5. (i;:': 25.08 o.w. 75 371.25 1,197.00 645.50 645.50 147.33 A/F' n:r F'LA~iNER ~:ir; r'~,~r~-n~n~. BLDG-ASSESS iRmA-CD A/F' VALVE KEYS .2. !- 41-10-2240 0i-4'27C 01-2040-0000 0! -4020-5:510 ! 2'."-4170-2200 2040 7i-7100-?'550 71-7100-'4540 2040 ,:')i (.; - 1 i'.:'0- 2(:40 0i-4'~20-42i0 2040 7:3-*'::T:f;-23')¢i AP-C62-Oi VEN~CR iNVOiCE DUE HJLD NO. iNVOICE NMBR 5ATE gATE STATUS WAYZATA AUTO SERVICE WS.q30 2/04/88 2/04/88 VENDOR TOTAL WI£~MER INC W5670 W~ M~LLER & SONS W5700 2/04/88 2/04/88 VENDOR TOTAL 2/04/88 2/04/88 VBNDOR TOTAL 2/04/88 W~RSI-PEARSON-~RSON XEROX CORru~TIU~ -, .,,. g~. / o,:, TOTAL 2/04/88 2/04/88 VE~E~OR TOTAL TOTAL ALL VEN[~RS PURCHASE JOURNAL CITYO~HOU~D A,~',OUNT DESCRIPTiC'N 60.00 SNO REF~CTOR 60.00 SNO EEFLECTGR 120.00 JR~iL-CD 120.00 231.00 GAS CO-DICKSNS 5~,7.00 BELAIR 860.00 GUMWOOD 1,658.00 jRNL-CD 1658.00 2,321.60 JAN S~ND 4?0.7? JAN BUCKSHOT 2,812.3~ JRNL-CD 2812.39 3!5.00 ~l.~O 300.00 '2,891,00 125.00 '4~502.50 MCCOMBS-DE~MON9 RD-~SESS MC~MBS-HAZARD BL[GS-AS~ESS MCCOMBS-RAFFERTY-ASSESS A/P MCCOMBS 4 QTR SERV A/P MCC~BS 4 QTR SE~,] JFJqE-CD 4502.50. 146.31 F~ PRiNC-56CK~ 24.16 FEB INT-5600 170,47 JRNL-CD 170,47 88,458.90 ACCOUNT NL"~qBER 73- 7300-2:.::.{Ei 01-4280-2310 2040 78-7800-3300 73-7300-3800 2040 01-4280-2340 27-5800-2340 2040 01-1170-0000 01-1!90-0000 01-I190-0000 01-2040-0000 20-2040-0000 2040 01-4320-5000 01-4320-6110. 2040 C~ECK ~: CITY of MOUND 5341 M4. YWOOD ~.OAD MOUND, MitINESOTA 55354 ~{i !2) 472-: 155 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR JANUARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1987 LIQUOR STORE PROFITS The Mound Liquor Store sh'ows a preliminary net income of $46,000 for 1987. This is an increase of approximately $9,000 over 1986 income. Liquor sales were up 3.3%, and Joel Krumm kept expenses near ~986 levels. We had budgeted a $30,000 net income during the 1987 budget process. 'At that time, we had concerns regarding the future profitability of the liquor store. Based upon the favorable 1987 results, we are projecting a profitable liquor store in 1988 and 1989. INVESTMENTS ' The following is January investment activity: Balance 1-1-88 $9,045,162 Bought: CP 7.02 Due 4-22-88 Marquette 249,696 CP 6.96 Due 2-16-88 Piper 247,940 Farm Ct. 7.60 Due 7-01-88 Dainr 400,000 CD 7.00 Due 7-15-88 St. Bk of Mound 260,000 CD 7.00 Due 7-25-88 St. Bk of Mound 125,000 CD 8.05 Due 1-20-89 Dain 100,000 Matured: Fed Home Loan 10.62 Dain (100,000) T. Notes 5.91 American (400,000) CD 5.80 St. Bk of Mound (200,000) CD 6.00 St. Bk of Mound (200,000) CP 6.90 Piper (210,395) Farm Ct. 7.25 Dain (200,000) CD 6.95 Dain ( 90,000) CP 7.65 Dain (299,896) CP 7.85 Piper (130,075) CP 8.30 Piper ()50,566) Balance 1-31-88 $8,246.,866 J.,' :ls CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 February 4, 1988 TO: FROM: SUJBECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. January's Activity Report In January'we pumped 1'9,055,000 gal'long Of water. .January Produced 2 water main breaks, 4 new accounts, 1 t-off, 16 final readin$, 9 service call and 1029 meter read out of 1050. ~ .- : The cold weather kept us busy with broken meters and frozen pipes. We helped the Street Department with snowplowing and sidewalk cleaning. I spent alot of time with John Cameron on the new building. Annual reports are finished and turned in. The Sewer Department reported no back-ups for January. We have been pulling motor maintenance in the lift stations. This consists of greasing, bearing inspections and electrical tests. With the amount of snow'in Janaury and Bob being sick for acouple of days Scott helped read meters and Damon pulling 2 days with sidewalk cleaning. Scott Kivisto attended Sewer School in January. He took ~e Class D Waste Operators exam and passed it with flying colors. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 February 4, 1988 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: January's Activity Report January was atypical month of normal service. The cold and snow brought a few items of extra Work. Due to the several snowfa'lls and freezing streets it was necessary to send .some Work outside our own shop. As. my duties include plowing and sanding'when the conditions require. Our sidewalk snowblower required extensive rebuilding to continue operating. As in the past we were able to complete this job here is our own shop and save a great deal of money and down time. The cold weather also took its toll on a number of batteries, fuel filters and thermostats. As we go into 1988 I am going to start an inventory control program. By keeping and having items such as filters, additives, small parts and other equipment on hand we can do a more efficient job. Of course this will be implemented as time and budget money 'is available. I believe this program will benefit all departments in keeping down time to a minimum and ultimately save the city money, not only in parts prices but man hours also. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD k~,OUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 February 4, 1988 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator January's Recycling For the year of 1987 the City of Mound has rec. ycled 276 tons of:material or 7% of i't'.S to6.al'wa'ste stream. We were req6ired'to do 6% this year. 88.4 tons of material was accounted for at the compost site in Minnestrista. For 1988 we are required to do 9% of ou'~ waste stream, this is 342 tons. Hennepin County is meeting with all the cities that are interested in obtaining containers. They feel if they purchase them in a mass quanity the price will be very reasonable. For 1988 the Recycling Congress will be meeting in St. Paul. This is a very good conference. Hennepin County is also planning another Recycling lunch sometime in March or April. January's pick-up was 12.02 tons and 308 households. '.", vc ,:';- :..:.r-, r ' ?,:.z.~:.'.'~ t? ?' '.r(5:":'er t or ("r: :.v"~,.:-r: :c ,:: :':.~'a-'.-~ a~C g:~:,,~c$. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 February 3, 1988 TO: FRObl: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Gene Hoff Street Supt. January's Activity Report From the 4th through the 8th the weather'was yery cold. We spent most of our time'servicing equipment and rebuildihg our'snbwblower. We spent about $500.00 on parts not counting labor, we replaced both side plates, drive chain, 4 auger bearings, 'l cutting edge and 2 universals. Hopefully we shouldn't have anymore problems with the blower unit for awhile. The llth we got about an inch of snow in the morning, we sanded till noon then started to take down Christmas decorations. We didn't finish until the 19th because of cold weather and other work that had t.o be done. · .The 2Oth we got alot of snow 10'~ to 12", started to plow at 3:00 a.m. and finished at 3:30 p.m. We cleaned sidewalk for the next 2 days. The week of the 25th we mixed salt and sand everyday and had 3 trucks widening streets and pushing off slush and resanding. The 31st we got some freezing rain the the morning, we sanded for 3 hours. SIGN WORK Replaced 3 stops signs, 3 No Parking. CEMETERY Staked out 5 graves and 1 marker. STREET MATERIALS PURCHASED 445 tons sand. 101 tons salt 8& tons buckshot LEN HARRELL Chief.of Police TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 Ed Shukle, ~i~[~n~C~r William Hud s~j~ Monthly Repo~ January, 1988 EMERGENCY 911 I. STATISTICS The police department responded to 398 calls for service during the month of January. There were 18 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 criminal sexual conduct, 1 burglary, 11 larcenies, and 4 vehicle thefts. There were 36 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses included 3 child abuse/neglect, 7 criminal damage to property, 1 forgery/NSF check, 1 liquor law, 6 DWI's, 4 simple assaults, 1 domestic assault, 6 harassment complaints, 4 runaway/incorrigibility, and 3 others. The patrol division issued 171 adult citations and '13 juvenile citations. The 184 citations included 71 parkin§ violations. An additional 186 warnings were issued during the month. Two adults were arrested on felony' situations and two'juveniles. There were ten adults arrested for misdemeanors and eight juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. The department assisted in one personal injury accident and 17 property damage accidents. There were 20 medical emergencies, 15 animal complaints. Surrounding agencies requested mutual aid assistance from the Mound Police Department nine times during the month. Property valued at $23,840 was stolen during the month of January and of that figure, $13,599 worth of property was recovered. IV. INVESTIGATION Sgt. Hudson and Off. Grand worked on a total of 8 child protection matters for the month of January. Some of the matters worked on during the month were hold-overs from December. There were approximately 59 hours of investigative time put towards child protection matters. Other cases investigated included possession of stolen property, burglary, snowmobile theft, auto theft, worthless checks and assault. Effective January 11, 1988, Off. Grand was assigned to the investigative division. Since that time he has spent time with Sgt. Hudson working on training as it applies to the investigative division. Off. Grand has also spent approximately 22 hours since that time working with the schools in the school system, especially getting to know the people in the school systems, putting togther an agenda to establish guidelines as to how the Mound Police Department will be working with the schools and implementing a drug and alcohol awareness program and the Officer Friendly program and any other needs that the school feels the police department can assist them in. There were a total of 8 formal complaints signed in the month of January. The complaints included 1 felony for burglary, 3 gross misdemeanors for DWI, 4 misdemeanor complaints which included 1 for open bottle, 1 for possession of marijuana and drug paraphenalia and 1 for worthless checks. III. MANPOWER As mentioned earlier in the investigative report, Off. Grand was promoted to an investigator effective 01-11-88. Off. Huggett continues to be on the field training officer program and from the reports of his field training officers, he appears to be doing ~very well. During the month the officers used a total of 55 3/4~hours of overtime, 93 hours of vacation time, 53 hours of sick ~ime, 17 hours of comP time were utilized and 52 1/2 hours of comp time was earned by the officers. IV. TRAINING Officers Ewald and Lotton attended the John Reid Interviewing and Interro- gation School. Ail of the officers have attended this school now, except for the two officers who have just recently been hired. The school accounted for 48 hours of training time. V. RESERVES'" The reserves donated 298½ hours to the department and the community in .January. The unit still consists of 10 active, members and 1 member on a leave of absence. The reserve officers assisted the regular officers in four transports of prisoners, attended 8 hockey games, and road with the regular police officers 127 hours. MONTH POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT JANUARY YEAR 1988 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUP~ARY THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 58. 58 , , '110 Non-Hazardous Citations 56 56 78 Hazardous'Warnings 20 20 31 Non-Hazardous Warnings 116 116 ~68 Verbal Warnings 72 7'2 73 Parking citations 71 71 54 DWI 6 6 14 OVER .10 2 2 12 Property Damage Accidents 17 17 10 Personal Injury Accidents 1 1 4 Fatal Accidents- 0 0 0 Ad'it Felony Arrests- ' 2 2 14 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 17 17 46 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 4 4 3 Juvenile Felony Arrests 2 2 10 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 8 8 9 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 7 7 3 Part I Offenses. 18 18 34 Part II Offenses 36 36 59. Medicals 20 20 13 Animal Complaints 50 50 85 Other Public Contacts 301 301 423 -[l~ ..... 884 884 1,'253 TOTAL Assists 38 38 45 Follow-Ups 28 28 62 5 5 - HCCP .,. CRZ ES Assault Homicide Sexual Conduct Robbery Burglary 1 1 Larceny 11 2 Vehicle Theft 4 1 1 ADULT, JUV Arson TOTAL PART II CRIMES Child Abuse/Neglect Forgery/NSF Checks Criminal Damage to Property Weapons Narcotic Laws Liquor Laws Simple Assault Domestic Assault Domestics (No Assault) Harassment Runaway/Incorrigibility/Truancy Public Peace Ail Other Offenses TOTAL PART III &'.'PART IV Property Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Medicals Animal Complaints Aid General Investigations TOTAL~ Henn. Cty. Child Protection TOTAL ACTIVITIES 18 3 7 3 36 17 1 0 20 50 9 301 '398 5 457 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 3 14 2 1 8 10 8 2 ,,I PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMMARY Bikes Snowmobiles ITEM Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. JewelKy'& Precious Metals ~uns Home Furnishings STOLEN $19,499 5OO 150 83 7OO 150 321 800 1,637 Radio & Electronic Equipment Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment Miscellaneous TOTAL $23,840 RECOVERED $12,799 8OO $13,599 City MOUND Month JANUARY 19 88 CITATIONS or OUi More than .10~; BAC ADULT JUV Carel.e.ss/Reckless Driving 1 Driving After Susp. or Rev. 5 Open BOttle 1 1 2 Speeding 29 3 No DL or Expired DL 3 Restriction on DL 26 Improper, Expired, or No Plates Illegal'Passing Stop Sign Violations 5 Failure tO Yield Equipment Violations I7 H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance I1 al or Unsafe Turn tver the Centerline Pa~k'ing'Vio'latlons " 7I 4 Crosswalk 5 Do9 Ordinances Derelict Autos 1 MisCellaneous Tags TOTALS t 171 WARNINGS No Insurance 'OTAL ~ 3 1 1 Felony 7 Mi sdemeanor ARRESTS 33 4 Traffic 19 6 Equipment 102 10 'Crosswalk 2 Animals Trash/Derelict Autos 4 Other 160 26 °MOUND POLICE RESERVES MONTHLY HOURS 'MONTH ~'~ r~ YEAR I~ OFFICER ACTIVITY ~5~ ~ ~¢1 ~ ~/~ R/~/~ ~/? ~a~ '~2¥ ~,~I TOTALS EMERGENCY C~LL OUT RESERVE SQUAD i COMMUNITY SERVICES HOCKEY/FOOTBALL GAHES ~,~ T NING INSTRUCTION ADMINI'STRATIVE MONTHLY MEETING ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH Pinewood Derby Race 8 Hockey Games 4 Transports Stalled Bus at Main Intersection Henn. Cty. Sheriff's Dept. School OFFICERS R5 Thompson RI4 Svoboda R6 Hawks R16 I~iCcum RI~ Romain R17 Manthei R12 Smith R19 Nelson R13 Meuwissen R23 Vogel R24 Stahlbusch TH=~hJT i -FEB- .~4.:,, ,...,~-,....~ ~ ~.C)N ....... ~ -- MOUNn POLICE DEPAF' ACT Z V I T i' ;COZIES: :--~L REA E N F O R S CALLS FnR _ ADTIVZTY ANALYSIS ~Y F'ATF.'.DL ".:) ]. ,." (") ~. IL--:E: THRU,:"." 112518::: ACT _ p..-.T:,r~L ,-,'-.,-..".m_. CODE ACTiViTY 'r'l ~" "-' '"-' r"-' T P T 'Z.,L ._ ~, '~, . ,.~ I- . ON · :, ( .... '2, 0 '2' 0 ::: .o S.,'C) .. TOTAL ! 0 20 :30 :'_:, 0 SPE EFi ]; I",i.0 '7' 'p ,:T,' 2 '--' 6 · ~ ,L r', ~...LI 0'-]:'0C:,2 NO D/'L .., E)(F'" ""'""- D/L :3 1 BOTTLE 2 2 A'F..'C:: :i..q. STL'.iF' .S i SN 5 ,::,.- ~a ]L Pt',,.._, , V E!LA'F ...... 17 · .0'F'02.5 OVEF.: THE CENTER LINE 2 Ct-T-.'027. .._.-,_,v_,' .... ~"~', THE CENTER LINE C, '.~; C.'- :2: C, CRLqS, S~4¢~LK V i OL¢~T I ON J-OBSTRUCTED VISION 4 0'.-7;051 d-ALLOWING Ih-;CQPIF'ETENT TO CRV O'P :1. OC~ F'ARK I NG/ALL OTHER 09140 NO F'AR!<ING/Wi,'4 ~ ,_~.: .... r'-...._, ..-..,,.:.., 5 2 5 0 '? 210 ,-, ~ .- ".r - ,'--, r- ,.._H , .'-' e_., / NO - I MF'ROF'ER- E X F' I RED 3 4 0'.:.,"2 'c/' 0 NO ! NSURP;NCE/F'F:OOF OF J- '.jrl .i ',=._R(-' ,',,...,E/F'F,'OOF OF '!, 2 ,:: ':.:"~ 4- ':::' CH¢'~?'.]~¢E (-JF KiOh't ! C i LE i -FE?-88 r:"'-' ~ 7! AF"; ¥ ',- r... I $i"J." S n~.,,~., ,.,,_._ '"'7", ACT~':,/IT'¢ CODES: ALL REA E N F 0 R S ,~ i--~ L... i_ ,,._, FOR ....... .'[CE ACT'iVITY ANALYSZS BY F'ATF,'OL ::)I/0! / ;--:',E', THRU 01/25/::',S ACT - PATROL ~--.'~R-,-.,,_, CODE ACTIVITY DESCRI F'T I ON 5 C, ,':','-~ 7 C, F', 'F' 0 TOTAL ! 0 20 :]-:0 1:2 2 Oq:' 3 ! :3 ! FgUND AN ]; MALS/I '"¢"'~",.,r. ,_.h_.,i',~D....," ~ -- u,_,,,i_ F'ROF'ERTY 7 2 1 ,:}'.~;:=: 14 FOUND VEHICLES 1 2 C,'F;4:EO FEn..:.=, .... t~,._ INJURY ACCIDENTS 0'~;'45 0 r-:' =' :-i r:" = ~' T '" DAhiAGE 2 :-3 i 4 i i 2 4 0'.--.,'710 ATTErIPT~,r~ SUICIDE · .0'~'7:B0 MED I CALS 7 1 8 2 5 2 09' 732 CRISIS INT. -ME,~iCALS ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED 0'~801 DOMESTIC/NO P~SSAULT 1 5 · ' 4 ALL HCCP CASES C, ?."'.:;.' C" 4 OPEN DOOR 5 2 I 2 2 O'.--.,"F-,' 10 MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS JUVENILE STATUS OFFENSES 1 0'.--.,'9 :---:0 HANDGUN APPLICATION 2 4 0'.--.; ? 4 5 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 7 3 C' 'F,' '.-} '.-7., I J-MiSC, VIOLATIONS ('_) '.--..' ?' 'i;' 2 ,*'i L.,' T U A L A I D / 8 i 00 I NSTALLAT .7. ON '" ~'"' ,q' r ,r, r-n- ,- .... - 'r ...... CODES: ALL REA ",·1 ! CR .... FOR SERVICE ACTiViTY~-.'c,~d/"'ver S.~,.., ~.. BY PATROL ,"~.. 1 / 01 f :_:: E: T H R U *'~... 1 / '-'-'._,:'/' L:: ACT - F'ATROL AREAS CO[If:_' ACTIVITY I]. E=CR.~ PT I ON 5C. /-, C' 70 ',E', C~ '.-.-; 0 TOTAL I 0 20 :--:0 .-¢ ~IUTUAL A I D/'/:,500 :3 ASLT F, INFLICTS ATTEMF'TS PiRM-HHNDc..-~DLT-~.TF, 2 ~:-,,..T^'-" 5- I NFL I P.~T~' ATTEMF'TS HRM-HANI]S-CHLD-FAM 1 CL..,.: .......A ~,,._ ] F, ._- ~,~ ATTEPIF'TS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACC-.:, 1 ~._,q...).:, ~:~_ ,._F,-FEAR.~_,,_,.%'-'r"]rlT~' Y.--. HARM-UNK WEAF'-ATfLT-b;Tr< ;~'; 'P 50 :'2 .... =_, .................. .J FR2:-I~-JNK bJE~r--C.,d,'~ ]-HEFT I :-_':C ,:: '::. TF~AF-&CCID-MS-.L'~RIVE UNDER !NFLUE~',4CE OF LIQUOR 4 2 · .1'?:051 CSC 2-UNK m~-F'OS AUTH '" fR.- u~,,l.,-r~ 13-F 1 M41(.')4 LIQUOR - POSSESSING M5350 RUNAWAY 3 4 N31 'F..'O FEA,_.~- ft-, HMRRA~,~iNG COMMUNICATIn lqlSTURB ' r-=_¢,o ..... 5 2 0:3601 OBSEN!TY-MS-INDECENT EXPOSURE-TO MINOR i { O:':-::E::E: 1 -Mo-OB=C,=N~ PHONE CALL-MINOR OBSENITY ..... ~- ~= ] F':'::IIO PROP DAMAGE-MS-F'RIVATE-UNK INTENT F':3130 F'ROF' DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT 2 (i F':-::310 TRE~r ~.oS-M,.,- F R I VATE-UNK INTENT 2 T 205 S¢ TH_F~. '= ~-S'~'~i-$2500-FE-FRM YARDS-OTH PROF' 1 T2~5'F' ..... Tn~-,.-$ZuI-$.2500-FE-FRMT '-- MOTOR VEHICLE-O]-H F'F::OF' 1 ]' 4 (7:2 1 1 T4C, 2'F.' THEFi-:..-:.,:.._,L) .=.::,.::,-,~-IS-FRM BUiLDING-FJ-FH R Lll'.4: · 'TMEN7 t - F E B - :]-: 8 ~.NS!,-,,..L~-~,.O~ NAME -- M~.,._.',D FO=ICE 1]EPAF PAGE 4 !'"' R I lq i-A,R ¥ I '= ~'d -" ?, ,:,:,IL ~ :' ND A, CT I V t T"f CODES: '"" ~,.-b REA CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY~,,~a~"l~ v~!S,L-: BY F'ATROL 0 i / 01 / ::::--'. THRU 01/25 ACT - , ~.~TROL AREAS CODE ACTIVITY £ESCRIF'TI ON 50 60 7 C.' ::: 0 TOTAL 10 2(i) :30 ,-0 .",'--..'. THEFT ....... ~.4' =' ".-, :-) LESS-, u=,- FRM*"-' Y ARTIS- OTFI PROP THEFT -'-"=' ' '"'S .--._,0 LESS--,, -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-FIREARMS 1 : 1 T4!59' THEFT-m25Q LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP :-:: 1 2 U I 0 ]. 4 THEFT-FE-BY CHECK-S:]:Ol-S50C) 1 ~F,=.-.-MS-BY =,!,-'.,iNDLE OF;: 'TI-qlCK-$:.'?~:~':'.'. LESS U:L::O/::.6 - ,'-i-T '-' ,, ...... 1 'L Vol ~N: ,-FEB-..-:, IN~A_:ATI04 NAME --,,,~u~, POLICE ~:r,~R~,~B~ PASE I · .0,q:01 ~c~n~tn~ ~n~-c. ALL A~T,VI., Cu~I:S. ALL GRID: ~ ~mTTUTTY ~ ....... CODE/ OFFENSES ~SCRiPTtON REPORTED ENFORS .p"r ! t OFFENSE A., I ATY BY.~TCPn~:~:n"'.~.~., O1/O~/,gS THRU O] '-~"~" / ................ m--r~t~DD pID6[:DTI / AC~AL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL F'ERCD.. UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ~IiJLT ""':"" ' ~LEA ..... ~,¥.,~= EXCEPTION CLEAF~D 0 2 0 1 0 ! 2 100.0 A.~o.,~ 1 ASLT 5-I~L!CTS ATTEMPTS H .... H~M ..... ~D ~A,, 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 ASL! ~,-!N~LIuTS ATTE~F'T8 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 100.0 A7502 1 0 TERROR-~RT IXFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADLT-AC~ ~:]874 1 0 ~-UN~CO NRES NO FRC-U-U~( WE~:'-COM Th~ BURG ' 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 !00.0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 13060 &RIM Aor~ST FA,,-,,o-~EG~E~T OF A CHILI; J2500 2 W:AFFIC-GM-DRIVE UND~ INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J3500 4 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR CSC 2-UNS{ ACT-POS M5.750 4 0 I 0 .I i 2 0 0 2 I00.0 4 0 0 ; 100.0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 I 0 ! 100.0 0 3 I 4 100.0 !) n ' ' 1 ?0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 ~'.~, 1-FEB-.?:~ INS A~.~_~,G,~ NAME -' r~uu:<~. POLICE CE:ES: ALL ACTtViIY CCDES: ALL GF:!D: ~L ENFORB OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY D,~, ~S,T~ON 01/01/','-:'.~', THRU r,~..,,,,.,~¢..:.~ ..... --', ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY AF2EST .... BY TOTAL F'ERCE,. T2057 1 O I 1 0 0 THEFT-~251-$2500-FE-FRM YARD~-OTH PROP T2157 1 0 1 1 '~ 0 0 -~,-~..,.,,.,~r:-,,,,'~ MOTOR VEH!CLE-OTH PROP ~.,z~ 2 O 2 .~! '- i O' THEFT-~250 LESS-~S-FR~ BUILDING-MONEY T402'~' :.U~Lu~,,.._,.-o ~H PROF' THEFT-S250 ~c-~' -~-"'::'~ ...... ' .... n-, 0 0 ,0 THEFT-K-~-gY o.':,,?I, = OR TRiCK-S250 LESS 0 1 ' :'" 1 0 I I 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 100.0 0 1 0 0 I .. 0 1 I :::l. 0 ..... THE;T-rE-OVER 0 ! 0 I .-c, -:, ~;~-u,.., TU, EFT_ FE - ~ 251 - ': 2.'. 30- AUTO. i 0 ! 0 0 0 I I !.::0, 0 CITY of MOUND February 2, 1988 5341 M:AYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL / JANUARY, 1988 MONTHLY REPORT The month, consequently the year, shot out of the gate fast and furious. The "Vikes" were hot, stimulating weekend beer sales, the "weather" was not, freezing the lake, creating tall fish tales. Sales for January 88 were a stunning 10% over January of 87! Totals f'or the month were $60,903...Customer Count was up by 77 people. What make these figures even more impressive is that we had one less day of business in :January of this Year. com'pared to January of last year. And, it was a Friday's day of 'business we lost! We held our year end inventory on Sunday, January 3rd, early in the morning around 7:30. It went very smooth, as usual, and we finished counting near 11:30 AM. As of this moment, we are putting on some final touches to the process. In a couple of weeks, we should have a preliminary analysis, performed by our highly esteemed Finance Director, John Norman (Alias, "Normal"), as 'to the bottom line, the nitty gritty, the "nuts and bolts" of 1987's' financial picture. Other events occuring in January were: 1. Superbowl Sunday fell on the last day of the month which made for a very busy Saturday eve. I believe that I mentioned last year that I felt that the Superbowl event is almost analogous (in dollars and cents) to one of the year's minor holidays such as Memorial or Labor Day as far as liquor stores are concerned. It gives people ANOTHER reason to celebrate. Would it suffice to say that business was good? January Monthly Report February 2, 1988 Page 2 2. Our roof began leaking in two se.parate spots, damaging our brand new ceiling tiles we installed in August, causing much grimacing and gnashing of teeth. Fortunately, last summer, when our landlord asked me how many complimentary tiles we needed to cover the entire ceiling, I anticipated such a catastrophe and "over booked", as they say in the airline business. Or you could call it my attempt at planning for long range goals for the future of the Mound Municipal Liquor Store. 3. Two of my part-time employees gave me their notice they would be leaving. One because he had found a better paying job and another because of health reasons. So, I am in the process of selecting two new recruits. It's very difficult to find good people. And it is extremely hard to keep them when I have to tell them that the City does not want to pay them more than $3,900 a year so that they don't have to contribute to the P.E.R.A fund. JK:ls CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MI,NNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY MANAGER FROI~: CITY CLERK DATE: February 3, 1988 MEHORANDUM SUBJECT: JANUARY MONTHLY REPORT There were two regular Council Meetings in january. The first was an organizational meeting, i.e. appointment of acting Mayor, acting Cit-y..Manager~ official .newspap.er~, designation of official depositories, etc. There was agenda preparatio'n, minutes, 25 resolutions and clean-up items from the two meetings. One new ordinance was new ordinance was a~opted relating to the Park Ad- visory Commission. There was a bid opening on the Shoreline Protection (rip-rapping of Commons areas). I prepared resolutions and all necessary forms on seven tax for~ feit properties for Council action. Also prepared were resolur · tions and necessary forms on seven parcels that had expired tem- porary easements that had to be released. I attended a MCFOA (HN. Clerks' & Finance Officers' Association) Executive Board Meeting in Alexandria, MN., to finalize prepara- tions, i.e. educational programs for the March State Conference. I also attended a Region IV MCFOA Meeting in Hanover. I an continuing to work on city property card file to keep it current. Hearing notices were prepared, advertised and sent out for the public hearing to be held February 9 to consider a proposed vaca- tion of a sewer easement. There were the usual calls from citizens regarding various sub- jects. fc ]'0: City Manager and Members of the City Council and FROM: dan Ber~trand, Building O~icial oL. BJ~t.]: January, ]?88 Monthly Report We have had two Planning Com~ission ~,eet~ngs in danuapy on ~]anuary 11~ i'E~SE Board of' Appeals and danuary 25, ~gF::E: Training Workshop on the Comprehensive Plan. Marge has attended two Plan- ning .Co~mission ~eetings and the F'ark Co~mission meeting. There were 17 working days in danuary and 2 holidays. I have taken one day compensation time and Marge has taken one day o~ vacation. 'The ¥ollowing inspections were conducted during the month danual~y: Site inspections Footing inspections Framing inspect ions Insulation .inspections Drywall inspect ions Final inspections Progress inspections Er'osi on/Grad lng inspections House moving/Demolition Heating inspections Plumbing inspections ~ire sprinkler/Fire Code Complaints Total 15 1 7 2 3 14. 12 0 0 6 11 0 4 This list of' inspections does not include 5 inspections for our Depa~tment ~on, the substitute inspector' during n~y attendance at the annual school. The monthly report fop Dece~,ber was subm, itted to the C~ty Manager du~ing 'the m, onth. Work has. been com, rr, enced on the annoal report f;r. oi~, the Planning/Inspection Departn',ent which will be submitted to the Manager by the 1?th o¥ Febpuar. y. ]-he Planning Co~'r, mission nas received their annual report o{: 82 Zonin.o. Cases during the year o.F 19'87 as well as the reports ~rom the Planner on the Co~,- prehensJve Plan. '[he F'lanning Com~,ission red'erred one Zoning variance case to the City Council ~or action. During danuar'y~ I have worked with the City Prosecutor during the update and pending trial cases which were ~ub~itted to his o~fice ~'~or the hazamdous building reports as well as exterior storage co~,plaints~ and two building code co~,pliance notices thane were set. f.'or trial during the ~ont. h. dohn Ca~eron, dohn Nor~an and ~ysel~' reviewed the three escrow accounts which will be dropped Crom the list as oF the end l?R7. John Ca~eron met with ~e to discuss the pendinQ proposal ~ro~ First Minnesota Savings and Loan~ an application ~or new ho~,e construction in Shadywood Point~ completion o~ the projects under bond ~'om Morse Addition and Seton F'lace plat. John Norman supplied the year ending expenditures and income ~'igupes ~or the annual report to our Department. The City vehicle was in repair o~ the t. her~,ostat as well as the normal gasoline ~'ills in January. During the month the cold season is upon us and the car has been functioning ~airly well with the exception o~' no heat ~rom the heater. I met with representatives ~rO~ Brauns Clothing ~or Commerce Place as well as Contel during the ~,onth and reviewed remodeling plans. Brauns Clothing'"s valuation o~ construction is approxi- ~ately $100~000 to co~,plete that .Facility. Contel'"'s Service Center on the East side o~ []o~,~,erce Boulevard is an o~fice remodeling with a valuation o~ $c~ 000. Both plan reviews were corr, p].eted and per~,~ts issued in January. i visited the Taco Deli restaurant site several times during danuary~ once with the Health Inspector, ~'or a~ter the ~act nev~sion to their original proposal and proposed remodeling. Ii attend:i, ng the n',onthly sta~ meeting, visited the Spring Park site with the City Manager and Park Superintendent to look at the possible use o~ n~at. erial f. or the Mound Bay Park at the ~or~,er Green House site. The staff did meet with the City Council on Friday and Saturday .For a training session? and previous to that an interview with the instructor o~ the class~ to provide addic tional goal setting and team building with all o~ you. I'"m sure we all ~elt that it was a worthwhile training session to get to know each other and possibly better understand where each o~ us may relate our -Feelings ~or priorities within our Depart~,ents and throughout the City o~' Mouncl. I attended a 3 day annual Institute ~o~ Building O~icials at the Earle Brown Center for Cont inuing Education in St. F'aul. The annual school runs concurrent sessions ~or Buildin~ Housing, Mechanical~ Plumbing and ~;i].ectr~ cai .. The session topics that I attended were general session which covered the Housin'g spectrum throughout the nation in general., heat loss/heat gain calculations~ construction f'a~tu~es (causes and prevention)~ vapor barrier controversies in residential construction~ hazardous occupancies 19E:8 Code revision and glass and glazing I'~):EE Code pevisions. ]'he total numbep o~ building permits issued in danuary was 8 with a va]~uat, ion o¢ "-""-' 200. $.~4,=,, The valuation ~.gttres are attached on the Building Activity Report ~op danuapy. 1;n addition~ Marge has prepared the monthly calendar ~op the February City meetings and events. Mapge has arranged appointments fop inspections of bui]dings~ plumbing and the sub- stitute building inspector. Marge has prepared the Park Commis- sion Agenda., written the minutes ~op Park and Planning Commission meetings~ and a~ranged with the Public Works to have two grave sites staked out ~or burials. ~ Site inspections ~nclude the review o¢ the Planning Commission requests and pequirements~ site inspections ~op ¥1ood plain verification f'op ~optgage companies~ complaints and ~ollow-up to code compliance such as~ no building pepmits~ recheck o~ compliance not. ice~ review status o~ various sites f'op the City Prosecutor~ p~econstpuctio;~ meetings 'at the site ~or building permit applicants op realt, o~s~ ~'i~e damage and periodic comm~c~ial inspection upda,tes.~ ~ ]'he heating inspections duping the construction o~' the project ape included under the f'raming and ~inal inspections o¢ the building. The heating installations mentioned ape Cop separate equipment being placed in homes and businesses. VISION IS WHAT WE CLAIM WE HAVE WHEN WE FIND THAI' WE GUESSED CORRECTLY Thomas LaMance dB/ms CITY OF MOUND City '. 5~/~1 Maywood Roed StreetAddms$ Mound, MN. 55364 City and State aUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT ~tho~ January ,1~'1~88 -a NEW R£ S~DEh'TIAL CONSTRUCTION (Fimlt~ · total NomFimll¥ J NEW NON-RESIDENTIAL Tolll Non-Residential I 224 224,700. TOTAL MONTH AND I ', J U~,. ~E~ TO D/,~'~ 5 248,200. Fence/Ret.Walls I I J j I ~-m & Mech. j 15 j 1~ J i I 5341 MAYV,'OOD ROAD MOUND, L~,INhJE£OTA 55364 (612) 472-~15~, February 4, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL PARKS In January, we have maint'ained four skating rinks at: 2. 3. 4. Three Points Park Highland Park Clover ~ircle Park Doone Park.(have had to stop flooding .due to slope of ground would only flow off of rink area.) We were unable to establish a good ice base until after Christmas due to the weather not being cold enough. Now it seems we have too cold of weather for the kids to make use of these areas. Generally, we will maintain the rinks through the middle of February. Then the weather turns and it is too warm (in the 30's). This year I have brought back one of the summer seasonal maintenance workers to help in flooding these rinks. This has worked out very nice. He only comes in when the weather is good for flooding and we can get each area ready for skaters that 'day. Where in the past, working alone, I could only complete a couple areas, grooming and flooding, per day. COMMONS We were still working on the preparation for Black Lake dredge, Jennings Bay dredge, Sinclair wetlands walkway and the contract rip rapping. Currently, the Black Lake dredge is still scheduled to be done by the end of February. Jennings Bay area has not begun due to the private dredge not being started. The contract rip rapping of 1510 Ln. ft. will be done by the first week of February. Sinclair walkway is still waiting for final approval from the Watershed District. Park Department January Report February 4, 1988 Page 2 W'ith all of these projects going on ~.e are in the middle of the Commons Dock application process. Applications are coming in at a steady rate and is being handled very well through the clerical department. This whole application process for over 400 dock sites involves not only the Parks Departm'ent, but also many of the City Staff to see that all applications are processed with correct fees and information to allow for proper distribution 6f dock sites. TREE REMOVAL To date, we have only removed two trees from City Property. A beaver began the process and the City Contr@ctor had to finish it. It has been evident that the beaver population on the lake has been increasing. We have seen damage to a number of trees, even in the open bay areas. When we find this type of damage, bark removed completely around the tree and well into the trunk, we have the tree taken down. If it has only just begun, we can seal the removed bark area and wrap it with @. wire fence. GENERAL COMMENT .. With winter comi'ng tow. ard~ an end, I will f-ind~hat all the preparation work for getting ~the seasonal staff, purghase of equipment and evaluating mai'n'tenance work to be-.done, will consume a lot of time. We hope to accomplish a lot this summer with the new playground equipment coming in and it'sinstallation and the rip rap for the City Crew th@t is scheduled by the dock inspector. JF:ls //~'- / THIS LAST T~FS YF_AR .... LAST YEAR MONTH OF L,.,~/~Z(~_/_.~.: ,-///<~'"' MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE NO. OF CALLS /'~ ..... ~I ' ' ~'TON~ BEAEH - FIRE E~ENCY EMERGENCY O~ONO - r~ ~E SHOREWOOD - FIRE EMERGENCY EMERGENCY MUTUAL AID - FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL FIRE CALLS TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS COMMERI CAL INDUSTRIAL GRASS & MISCELLANEOUS AUTO FALSE ALACk- NO. OF HOURS - MOUND FIRE' - MT~ BCH FIRE EMERGENCY -M'TRISTA FIRE ~ EMERGENCY - O~ONO EMERGENCY - SHOREWOOD FIRE EHERGENCY TOTAL -SP. PARK FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL -MUTUAL AID FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL TOTAL EMERGEtICY HOURS TO~A: ~ HOURS TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY HOURS ~UTUAL AID RECEIVED Mound, Iiinne$ot& --~ DEPA~R.~'E:;T REPORT FOR MO:~i~{ OF DRILLS & ~.~IirIEN;JICE FIRE & RESCUE / //f/;~ WAGES WAGES HOURS RATE WAGES J. Andersen / ~. ~ -/~-- 3 3/ 6.00 /~-- O. Anderson / / ~ If-- ~ ~/ 6.00 /~-- J. Babb / / ~ /~-- ~ 3 ~ 6. O0 J. Beauchamp ,/ / ~ /F-- ~ ~ 6.00 /~ D. Bo~ / ~ ~ /~- / ~ / 6.00 /~ D. Bryce ~ Y ~. /f-- ~ ~/ 6.50 D. Carlson / / ~ /~__ J/~ ~ 6.00 B. Erickson / J ~ /%- ~ l/ 6.0~ S. Erickson / / ~ IF-- J,~ .~,f' 6.00 ~. o~v~i~ I ~ J / ~.~o 0 . /; ~.00 L. Heitz I ~ / ~ 1%-- //~ ~ ~.flfl C. Henderson / ~ ~ /~-- ~ ~ 6.OD G. Johnson / / '~ /~-- ~ /0 6.00 M. Kleeberger J ~ / ~..~d ~/~ .$~ 6.'00 /~-- ,. B .' Landsman ,~ / ~ /~-- ~ ~ ~ D 6. O0 T. Lord,s / ~ Z ~' ~ 0. /f 6. O0 //fL R. Marschke / / ~ · 1~--' 0 '.~ 6.25 J. Nafus , / J ~ .1%--' ~-- ~ / 6'.00 M. Nelson / / ~ /~-- ~. ~p 6.00 A. o~t~ / 2 .~ /~_ ~ ~ f ~. oo B. P~m / / ~ /~-- ' Y ~ 6. O0 /~-- G. Palm / / ~ /~-- $ jP 6.00 _O. Pederson / / ~ /f ~ ,~p 6:00 O. Platzer ~ ~ 0 --u-- ~ /3 6.00 T. Rasmussen / / ~ iF-- ~ /~ 6.OO T. s~n~.n / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ zJ 6.00 T. Swen$on / J) / t ~3'd 3 /~ 6.00 /f;-- ~r. S,~en~on ~ ~ / I~o U /.~- ~.00 ?~- T. Williams / ~ ~a /f~ ~[~ /~ 6.00 ii )iscipline and Ten,n ~ork 'ritlque of Fires 're-Planning ~'Inspectlons MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESTOA 55364 D R I L L R E P O R T Time ~ools & Apparatus Identifying .c~",)-'~'/- land Extinguisher Operation Jearing Protective Clothing Films First Aid and ResCue Operation' -~.~/'~--- Pumper Operat Fi re Streams & Ilou s e' Burr, l Natural & Pr-Opnl~e ~,,~S & Ocmo~ t rnt J t,.s Lddder lime Friction toss Salvage Operatlo~,s Radio Operations Ilouse Evol ut ion.~ Use of Self-Contalned H:asks Nozzle & Ilose Ailin,,ce Inhalator Operation tlO'[E: IlouYs Training Paid X_ Excused X U~excused 0 I'll'sent, llot Paid s c K,.c e__ o/ ,S I.I Andersen A~de~on ~Babb- Beauch'amp · Boyd Bryce Bryce Carlson~ Collins David Erickson Erickson _~a Garvais -~I/2- L Heitz ~//.~-C Henderson )0-.- G Johnson H Kleeberger ~BT Landsman _ Lo~aas ~_~R Marschke ~L//2--J Nafus '~.I/.)--M Nel son ~=~t_ A OpitZ ~__~B Palm ~6 ~)/J,l_ G Palm ~) ~l_;l Palm ~l/J- G Pederson ~]) D Platzer ~/2._ T Rasmussen _~/.~._ M Savage ~i/)._R Stallman T Stallman T Swenson -.il~,)...._ W Swenson ]~ R Williams ~l/).. T Williams . Drit~~,aster MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 D R I L L R E P 0 R T Time Discipline and Team ~,'ork ._ ..... Pumper Operati~.r~ Fire.Stremns ~ Friction Loss Critique bf Fires ..... Pre-Planning &.inspections Itouse Burning.t, Too~s & Apparatus identifying .-j.I/;)._. }latural &'Prop~,,e ~ns Talk & Ocmo~s t rat l ~,ns Hand Extinguisher Operation Ladder Evolutlons Wearing Protective Clothing Salvage Operations 'Films Radio Operations First Ai~ and ResCue Operation ~1/~ ttouse Evolutions U~e of Self-Contained Masks I~ozzle & Ilose Allim,ce inhalator Operation · s'ed 0 P~cxe~t, t~ot Fald ,,~,£: Hou'ds -;'raining P~id X -Excused X Unexcu ! ]~ J Garvais ~//~-- M Palm ~l/)L L Heitz 'D.//,,~- G Pederson Babb ~//~--C Henderson ~ D Platzer Beauchamp ~.I/~-~G Johnson ~//~t_ T Rasmussen Boyd ~l/o~--M Kleeberger ~//~--M Savage Bryce '~./~Z-B Landsman ~/~- R Stallman ~//~R Marschke ~//)-- T Stallman Bryce ~qJ__ J Nafus ~I/~_.T Swenson Carlson Collins ~//~-~M Nelson ~.W Swenson David' ~//~ A Opitz --- M-Tobcy ~//~ B Palm '~/~ R Williams Erickson . Erickson ,'-,,~11,,~ G Palm '~//~T Williams MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR Jzx~,l~z~ ~ 0 ~ C. Henderson O G. Johnson ~ ~ M. Kleeberger J. Andersen G. Anderson J. Babb J. Beauchamp D. Boyd D. Bryce S. Bryce D. Carlson S. Collins M. David B. Erickson S. Erickson J. Garvais L. Heitz R. Marschke J. Nafus MEN ON DUTY TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS ~ M. Nelson ~ A. Opitz ~ B. Palm ~ G. Palm ~ M. Palm ~ G. Pederson ~ D. Platzer ~ T. Rasmussen m ~ T. Stallman T. Swenson O W. Swenson .... M. Tobey T. Williams MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers Eugene A. Hickok and Associates January 17, 1988 Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation summary for December 1987 Lake levels in Lake Minnetonka have stabilized at approximately 928 in December as. illustrated by the attached graph and lake elevaiions. There has not been any discharge from Lake Minnetonka to Minnehaha Creek since November 17, 1986. Creek flow at the Browndale Avenue Dam in Edina is not measured during the winter months. The 30-year average precipitation for December at the National Weather Service station in Maple Plain is 0.86 inches. The.actual precipitation recorded in Wayzata for December was 0.79 inches. A summary of precipitation follows. PRECIPITATION SUMMARY Maple Plain Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport Wayzata Actual 30-Year Average December * 0.86 December 1.25 0.87 December 0.79 *Unavailable at the time of this report. 930.00 g2g.80 929.60 Minnehaha Creek Watershed Lake Mtka Water ElevaUons - 1986-1988 g2g.40 g2g.20 g2g.00 g28.80 NOHW(g2g.4-') Z 0 o 928.60 - 928.40 - 928.20 - 928.00 - 927.80 - 927.60 - 927.40 - 927.20 - 927.00 O7-Jul-86 RUNOUT ELEVATION~.g 28.6) I I i . I 23--Jan-87 1 1-Aug-87 Dote ,'IC~D ~ater Elevations - Lake'Minnetonka 27-Feb-88 Date Elevation FI~ 928.4~ 0 928.42 O. 928.40 0 T28.38 0 r'z8.$8 0 928.40 0 9~.~ 0 ~28.34 0 ~8.~ 0 ~28.3~ 0 ~8.28 0 ~.~ 0 . ~.20 0 ~.~ 0 ~8.22 0 ~.Z 0 ~7.~ 0 0 * NOTE: The zero e this adjus Date Elevation Flaw Date Elevation Flo~ Date Elevation Flo~ l§-Jun-87 927.59 O 26-Rug-B7 928.55 0 23-Jun-87 927.67 0 31-Aug-B7 %8.65 0 01-Jui-87 927.55 0 OI-5;p-B7 928.6~, 0 06-Ju1-87 927.48 0 O8-,gep-87 928.52 0 14-Jul-87 927,43 0 14-Sep-87 928.~ 0 16-3ul--87 T/7.37 0 18-5ep-87 T28.5~ 0 -21-Jui-87 927.71 0 21'~ep-87 928.47 0 ~-Jut~7 ~7.71 0 ~p-87 ~8.~ 0 2a-Jul-87 ~.62 0 28-Sep-B7 ~8.~2 0 27-Ju1-87 ~.75 0 ~ct~7 ~,~2 0 28-Jul-~ ~,~ 0 t2~ct-B7 ~28,1~ 0 ~Jut-87 ~.~ 0 15-~L-87 ~8. t5 0 31-Jui-87 ~8.Bl 0 2~Oct-~ 928.15 0 O~-Rug-87 ~.81 0 2~[~7 ~. 12 0 06-Rug~ ~8.78 0 0~ ~.~ 0 l~ug-87 ~.~ 0 ~-~ ~.M 0 ll~ug-87 ~8.77 0 16-~v-87 ~.0{ 0 17-~g-87 ~.~ 0 2~7 ~ 0 18~g~ ~28.~ 0 OI-D~-B7 ~28.1 0 l~ug~7 ~;~ 0 07-~c-B7 ~.08 0 24-~ug-87 ~.~ 0 14-~ec-87 ~8.08 0 levation for the tment was effecti * 05-Jan-B8 927.86 -19-Jan-~8 927.88 Lake gauge was adjusted down 0.22 feet, ve Jan. 1, 1988 METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION 560-6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411-4398 612/349-7400 January 29, 1988 Mayor Steve Smith City of Mound 5341 MaywoodBlvd. Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Smith: Recently I completed the first half of my appointment as a member of the Metropolitan Transit Commission. As you may recall, the 1984 Legislature created the Regional Transit Board to do comprehensive regional transit planning, and reduced the size of the MTC Board to three members. The Cc~mission's primary job is to operate the area's largest bus system. I represent the communities outside Minneapolis and St. Paul. This letter is intended as a brief report on MTC,s work activity during my service on the board. The major issue that has faced MTC has been to develop a strategic plan that gives MTC an opportunity to function effectively in a more competitive environment with basically constant resources. The nature of that environment was quite evident.in the past year, as stable gasoline prices pushed personal automobile usage to.higher levels; as "foul weather friends" took advantage of our mild winter of 1986-87 to rely less on MTC; and as both the federal government and regional agencies pursued policies aimed at increasing privatization of regional transit services. The MTC strategic plan has two major priorities. The first is to increase customer satisfaction by increasing the quality of all of the services MTC offers to the customer. The second is to look within MTC to find resources that can be reinvested into more productive services. One element of major importance in achieving customer satisfaction is the quality of the bus fleet. In order to retire the large number of buses purchased in the early 1970s, MTC needs to purchase or rehabilitate almost 125 buses per year. During the past year, we have received the last of 140 buses which the Commission chose to rehabilitate; accepted shipment of 87 new buses; accepted bids for the purchase of 107 buses which will be delivered early this year; and begun the process of ordering additional vehicles for delivery in late 1988. Upon completion of this purchase cycle, the average fleet age will be 5.43 years, down from a high of 11.4 years in 1984. -2- In addition to vehicles, other capital improvements have als0 moved ahead. The Commission worked with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Regional Transit Board to design timed transfer and Park-n-Ride locations along the 1-394 corridor. Tied to this, the Commission also initiated action to utilize an existing federal grant to purchase additional bus shelters for the areas within the 1-394 crescent. These will be installed as service is increased. Outside of the 1-394 corridor, funds have been proposed for four additional park/ride lots and some new bus turnaround areas. We recently opened park/ride lots in Burnsville, Mounds View and Newport. These will add over 200 new park/ride spaces to the system. A major emphasis has also been placed on improved customer services. In July, we supplemented our telephone information center with City Line, a touchtone telephone information system which permits riders to get much faster "next bus" information. The City Line system is already handling over 2,000 of the 5,000 transit information calls MTC receives each day. In late 1986, we opened the Transit Store in downtown Minneapolis. Customers may now pick out their own schedules rather than have to request schedules from a clerk. And we are now placing permanent schedule displays in Seven Eleven and Tom Thumb stores. Including these additions, pocket schedules will be available in 950 locations throughout the metropolitan area. In the hope of improving and making service more cost-effective, MTC made modifications to over 70 routes in 1987. Updated service alignments in the northeast quarter of Ramsey County were made last fall. We are presently working'with the Regional Transit. Board to study the feasibility of upgraded service in Anoka County and St. Louis Park. Also, working with the Regional Transit Board, MTC is developing plans to utilize transit and rideshare to relieve congestion in the 1-494 area, and with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to relieve congestion during various freeway reconstruction projects this summer. We are also actively supporting Hennepin County's study of light rail by providing potential feeder bus route~planning. On the negative side, excess capacity in the system resulted in the elimination of almost 800,000 annual miles of MTC service. These reductions were triggered primarily by a 3.6% ridership decline in 1987. Some of these miles may be restored by subcontracting with private transit providers. We are working with RTB to ensure that when subcontracting is done, planning and marketing are done in a way which ensures compatibility with MTC service. Many of the improvements I have noted come at an added cost to the taxpayer, but on the whole, MTC's operating expenses in recent years have grown very slowly. For example, in 1986, total operating expenses increased by about 1% over 1985. Part of this is luck. Fuel costs have remained tamer, and labor costs, which until recently were tied to the consumer price index, have grown only slightly. The Commission has also taken actions which have kept costs in line. A major example of this was the MTC labor contract agreement which was signed in 1986. While we -3- did not achieve all that we sought, I believe the settlement moved the MTC in the direction of increased productivity and more effective service, with labor costs increasing less than one percent annually over the 3-year contract period. MTC has also taken other steps to better 'utilize its resources. For example, we now cOntract with both Greyhound and Trailways to do fueling and light maintenance at MTC's Heywood Garage. We have also included in our request for federal funds a new Nicollet Garage facility, which is planned for joint public-private operator use. Frankly, I would be less than honest if I did not express concern about some of the decisions we have made at MTC to achieve greater effi6iency. Service reductions may result in more ridership loss, which may result in more efforts to reduce service. Transit plays a very important role in the transportation picture of this metropolitan area. We need to continue our efforts to ensure that all of our citizens have opportunities to travel throughout the area, and. to ensure that transportation services keep up with the development plans of communities. I enjoy my service on the Metropolitan Transit Commission, and look forward to hearing from you about the transit needs of your community. S%ncerely, ~ ! ~ Glenn G. C. Olson Commissioner GGCO/RL/kal/6900 MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY F'ARK COMMISSION MEETING January 14, 1788 Present were: Chair Nancy Clough~ Commissioners Shirley Andersen, Cathy Bailey, Stephen Burke, Marilyn Byrnes, and Linda Panetta; Council Representative Phyllis dessen; City Manager Ed Shukle; Park Director dim Fackler and Secretary Marge Stutsman. MINUTES T.he Minutes o~ the Park Com~,ission Special Meeting o~ December i5, 1'~87 were presented for consideration. Byrnes moved and Bailey seconded a motio'~ to approve the minutes as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Summer Recreation F'roqram Update The F'ark Director, dim~ Fackler, has talked with dim Glasoe, Recreation Coordinator ~or Community Services, and dim Glasoe ad- vised that he does not have enough information at this time to feel comfortable giving an update, but~ will have by the February meeting. Also he h~s made contact with the intern and will be ~eeting with her prior to'the ~ebruary meeting. REPORTS Council Representative Phyllis dessert reported on the following items: 1. New dock: sites - Six new dock sites were approved; i.e. Wood- land Point, Carlow and the-~4 ~at Lagoon Park. However, the Lost Lake sites were tabled and action will be taken on them at the next Council meeting. The neighbors.-in.the area want to be heard and some have been very vocal against having the docks put in. It was thought there had been a document/agreement saying that there could be no docks put in this area; however, nothing could be ~ound. · The Commission discussed the Lost Lake area and Commissioner Bailey stated that originally the Park Commission had forced the developer to do an Environmental Impact Statement because they were concerned about preserving the wetlands. Commission mented they would like to see something on the statement. 2. LMCD Dock Fees - Mound"s Representative to the LMCD~ Tom 'Reese, consulted with the Council as to what he should do at the LMCD subcommittee meeting on the increased dock fees for Mound that were to be discussed. LMCD"s Attorney wrote a letter stat- ing that we should be increased along with everybody else and then. it was questioned "what about the back ~ees fo6 the past years?" The F'ark Director, dim Fackler, stated that the LMCD be- lieves the City owes $18,000. in back fees; it was implied that they would waive the back fees if the City would go along with ~ 1 Park Commission Minutes d'anuary 14, 1'.-7~8:B - Page 2 ~the increased fees. The Commission discussed fees and that Mr. Mixa has stated fees are undebatable. It was discussed that Mr. Reese be invited to attend the Park Commission meetings so that he could learn more about the Park Commission's views on Commons dock sites. It was thought that LMCB was against the City.all,w- ing so many boats and they are saying they did not know what the City of Mound had. Fackler explained the various ways the LMCD Ordinance determines their fees. He stated ~ees were due 12-1- 87~ with a $100. fine. Our City Attorney is looking into this matter. The City Manager, Ed Shukle, stated that Phyllis has covered most items. He reviewed the proposed ordinance changes relative to the Park Advisory Commission and particularly to who will have which terms of office. It was thought, because of length of time served already, Bailey and Panetta's terms would expire in Clough and Byrnes' ter~,s in 1~0 and Andersen and Burke'°s terms in 1'~1. It was also thought wording on electing a Chairperson should be changed, to read, "....'members with a. lim-it of ~ con- secuti~e One year terms; and t~e Co~ission .... dessen moved and Bailey seconded a motion to recommend the adop- tion of the Ordinance with the change. The vote was unani~ously in favor. The Park Director, dim Faultier, reported on the status of the Black Lake Dredge (bid came ~in under budget and just today, he received the Watershed permi.t, all the information goes to the DNR who will issue permit; Wide, er then can start anytime at his convenience). On dennings Bay, Carlson Excavating called and they will be doing the private dredge. Carlson is interested in the specifications for our poption of the dredge; dim will meet with him to see what their ~inal design was for the dredge next week. He stated they do have two quotes in (Widmer and Niccum) 'that are under our budget. On the 1'~E8 Shoreline Riprap project, Wide. er gave the lowest bid at. $21,6'~3.50 for the entire 1,050 lineal ~eet. '[he whole budget is $42,000. The City is being reimbursed $5~7 from Federal Disaster Funds ~or some stor~, damage Crum last sL~mmer"S storm. The cost of the riprapping including es-timates for legal and engineering Cees and the cost of the dredge will come very close to the budgeted figure. Fackler also stated that originally they thought the riprapping would take 5 years; he is now looking at it being completed in 4 years due to the work the City crews have been doing. In response' to a ques- tion, Fackler stated the riprap is put at the O.H.W. of '~27.5 ]eve].. Fackler reported that the Bock Inspector, Dell Rudolph, has not received any complaints except one on the LMCD ~ee. F'ark Commission Minutes · .danuary 14, 1'~;-]::.--.: - Page 3 Fackler reported on getting trees and brush down on the Sinclair ~access (beavers have taken down about 5 trees). They have to take out silt ~aterial and side cast itt then they will come in with approxi~ately 3~B cubic yards o~ clay ~ill and make the path- way. They will be assigning the dock sites; however, they might not be useable until dune or duly. The Commission discussed having Certificates o~ Award prepared ~or the Co~,missioners that have left the Commission in the last ~ew ~,onths and invite those persons to the February meeting ~or a presentation. The Commission suggested the certificates be ~ramed. All seemed in favor. Election The Chair opened the nominations for Chair for 1'~88. Panetta moved and dessert seconded a mOtion to nominate Marilyn Byrnes; Byrnes ~,oved and Bailey seconded a motion to renominate the present Chair Nancy Clough and Byrnes 'asked to have her name be withdrawn ~rom the no~,inations. There were no other nominations. An unanimous ballot was ~st ~or Chair Clough. : The Chair opened the nominations ~or Vice Chair ~or 1~88. Bailey ~,oved and Panetta seconded a motion to no~inate Marilyn Byrnes ~or Vice Chair. There were not other no~inations. An unanimous ballot was cast ~or Marilyn Byrnes ~or Vice Chair. The Com~,ission asked to h~ge~ Thomas Reese invited to attend the Park Commission meetings~ particularly the October and November ~eetings when docks and dock sites are reviewed. ~They ~elt it was very important that Mr. Reese understand the Commission's viewpoint relative to the LMCD, etc. ADJOURNMENT Bailey ~,oved and Byrnes seconded a n, otion to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 P.M. All were in ~avor, so ~,eeting was adjourned. MINUTES OF ]-HE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 25, 1~88 Present were: Chairman Thomas Reese~ Commissioners Vern Andersen, William Meyer, Geoff Michael, Kenneth Smith, Brad Sohns, William Thal and Frank Weiland~ Council Representative Elizabeth densen; City Manager Ed Shukle~ City F'lanner Mark Koegler; Buildi~ng O~- ficial dan Bertrand; and Secretary Marjorie Stutsman. MINUTES The minutes' of the Planning Commission Meeting danuary 11, 1'~87 were presented ~or consideration. Weiland moved and Andersen- seconded a motion to approve the minutes as published. The vote was unanimously in favor. Workshop on "Comprehensive Plan" ~ The City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his memorandum relative to the process of updating the City"s Comprehensive Plan. He stated he wanted to give an overview of what we're going to be getting into and specifically he wanted to'hear any questions, concerns or special issues that have not been brought up in pre- vious meetings that the Commission wants to address. He noted Mound"'s present Comprehensive Plan was prep:areO in 1'~82 under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1~76 and has most o~ what the law required, butt not all. He explained that the Metro- politan Council is very much concerned with what they label as Metropolitan System, s; things like sewers, parks, transportation networks, aviation, housing-~nd so forth. He noted that all material assembled---'wiI1 be gone through ite~ by item--topics, etc. and then the sta~ will put together a draft text and bring it to the Commission for review and comment; mfter which the Com~,ission will take the draft through a public hearing. He commented that periodically the City Council would be provided with information or updates possibly through joint meetings so the Com~ission can be sure they are on track and proceeding in right direction. At the conclusion o~ the process, the plan has to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for their review and if it is found to be in conformance with their overall plans/policies and with law requirements, it is given back to City for formal adoption by the City Council. The Co~,mission had various questions and comments such aS: Where does Comprehensive Plan document stand legally in reference to Ordinances/Resolutions, etc. that run the City? Will it affect Zoning Ordinance? etc. They discussed that by year 2000~ the ar'ea wi].l see a lot of changes that will have a tcemendous affect on the City. Planning Commission Minutes ..January 25, l'.~E8 - Page 2 Mark Koegler advised that for the next meeting, he"il have a Schedule of tasks laid out for the Commission"s review and also have a discussion and review of goals and policies. He noted he would be providing information on changes you reasonably can anticipate such as population~ household, etc. projections. Transportation is another area where significant changeb will take place between now and the year 2000. There will be more traffic,althoogh not a corresponding amoont of new development. He gave vaPious figures and talked about Metropolitan Council's position for their year 2000 plan is to maintain the same level of service we have now -- admitting and designing congestion because without congestion they have more trouble supporting mass transit. He noted the n',ost challenging aspect the Commission will be getting into is not the plan itself~ work plan is really two fold. One is to update the Comprehensive Plan and the second is to prepare a Shoreland Management Ordinance. That is one area we will be conferring closely with the B.N.R. and any other agencies 'interested or e~)pert type people.needed at that time; a new course is going to be. charted. ~The Comprehensive Plan update and the Shoreland Management Ordinance are separate, butt 'both are funded by the C.B.B.G. ]-here was further discussion of the Tasks outlined on Attachment A. ABdOURNMENT Andersen moved and Weiland seconded 'a motion to ~adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m. The vote was all in favor so meeting was adjourned. Attest: Thomas Reese~ Chair bb~o TYRONE ..-eo. zc, $oo,~/ ~j';r- I --alii---------_Z p0 Z 0 TYRONE ~ - 950.0 - 'q6~'° Z