1988-07-12 CITY 0F MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M.t TUESDAYt JULY 12, 1988
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Pledge of Allegiance.
Approve Minutes of June 28, 1988, Regular Meeting
(will be handed out at meeting).
3. PUBLIC HEARING: CASE ~88-614: James Luger, 6195
Sinclair Road, Lot 6, Block 17, The Highlands,
PID #23-117-24 34 0071
REOUEST: Conditional Use Permit - Accessory Bldg. Pg. 1619-1628
4. PUBLIC HEARING: CASE #88-615: Jerome Studer, 4455
Radnor Road, Lots 9 & 10, Block 2, Pembroke, PID
PID %19-117-23 34 0036
REQUEST: Vacation of Permanent Slope Easement. Pg. 1629-1635
5. Approval of Sale of City Property Located on
Westedge Blvd. and Authorizing ~ayor and City
Manager to Execute Sales Agreement. Pg. 1636-1638
6. Approval of Payment Request #2, Public Works
Facility - $190,616.55. Pg. 1639-1640
7. Grading and Land Reclamation Permit - Russ
Peterson - 5561 Sherwood Drive. Pg. 1641-1663
8. Comments & Suggestions from citizens Present.
9. Approval of Licenses
Incredible Festival - July 30 & 31, 1988
Public Dance Permit
Charitable 3.2 Beer Permit & Set-Up Pg. 1664
10. Payment of Bills. Pg. 1665-1674
11. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Monthly Reports for June as prepared by
the Department Heads. Pg. 1675-1714
B.Planning Commission Workshbp Meeting Minutes
of June 27, 1988.
C. 1987 Financial Statement - L.M.C.D.
1
Pg. 1715-1717
Pg. 1718-1721
Page 1617
De
Fe
Ge
State of Minnesota, City of Mound -rs-
Frank Buysee.
Pg. 1722-1725
Invitation from AM1H to a "dutch treat"
breakfast meeting on Tuesday, July 19, 1988,
at 7:30 A.M., Minnetonka Community civic
Center, 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Please let
Fran know by Thursday, July 14th if you
plan to attend.
Pg. 1726-1733
Notice of the 65th Annual National League of
Cities Conference in Boston, Massachusetts,
December 3-7, 1988. Please let us know as
soon as possible if you plan to attend because
of hotel reservations. Th~ deadline for Early
Registration is September 5th and the sooner
the better for hotel accommodations.
REMINDERS:
- Economic Development Task Force Meeting, Thursday,
July 14 at 7:30 A.M., City Hall.
- Park Commission and City Council Park Tour, Thursday,
July 28. Meet at 5:00 P.M., Senior citizen Center -
will return at approximately 9:15 P.M. when pizza and
pop will be served - cost $5.50 per person.
- The draft of Housing Maintenance Code as prepared
and discussed by Subcommittee of Planning Comm-
ission and Planning Commission as a whole res-
pectively was distributed at the last meeting.
The Council is requested to meet jointly with
Planning Commission on July 11, at 7:30 PM
to discuss draft of Housing Maintenance Code.
- There will be a Lake Minnetonka Mayor's Meeting
held here in the Council'Chambers of City Hall
on Saturday, July 30, 1988, from 9:00 A.M. -
11:00 A.M. to discuss the Lake Minnetonka
Regional Park and the ability to condemn private
and public lands.
Page 1618
2
97
June 28, 1988
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR SESSION
The City Council of Mound, HenneDin county, Minnezota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, June 2B, 1988, at 7:30 P.M., in the
Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel,
Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were:
City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr, City Clerk Fran Clark, City
Attorney Curt Pearson, Building Inspector Jan Bertrand, City En-
gineer John Cameron. Also present were: Gayle Schuffenhauer,
Leo Clifford, Buzz Sycks, Gordon Swenson, John McKinley, Marge
Stutsman and Officer Rex.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten-
dance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
RETIRING EHPLOYEES RECOGNITION
The City Manager explained that Marge Stutsman is retiring after
15 years of service to the City =f'Mound in the capacity of
Secretary to a former City Manager Len Kopp, Acting City Manager..
in his absence and most recently Administrative Assistant'to the
Building Official. The Mayor presented Ms. Stutsman with a
plaque of r~cognition. "
The City Manager explained that Officer Rex, the canine with the
Police Dept. is retiring after 3 years of service to the City of
Mound.
MINUTES
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to approve the
minutes of the June 14, 1988. Regular Meeting, as submitted.
The vote was unanlmously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING= DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
The City Manager stated that the amount is down to $2,938.44.
The Council discussed the policy on time elapsing after the shut~
off of water and notification of the proper authorities of unsafe
living conditions. The Water Dept. will advise the proper
authorities of persons living in homes with the water shut-off.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. There was no one present in
the audience who wished to speak on this issue. The Mayor closed
the Public Hearing.and turned, the item back to the Council.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
98
June 28, 1988
RESOLUTION 88-94
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,938.44
AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF
WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE ~88-662=
GAYLE & CAROL SCHUFFENHAUER, 6350 RAMBLER L~NE,
LOT 9, BLOCK 2, MOUND TERRACE; PID ~14-117-24 32
0019. FRONT. SIDE; AND V~RIANCE TO ALLOW STRUC-
TURAL MODIFICATIONS TO NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE
The Building Official explained the request and stated that the
Planning Commission had recommended approval.
Abel moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #88-95
RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION #87-178
TO ALLOW A TWO STALL GARAGE WITH ENTRY
AND 10 FOOT BY 10 FOOT STORAGE AREA AND
DECK FOR LOT 9, BLOCK 2, MOUND TERRACE;
PID %14-117-24 32 0019, (6350 RAMBLER
LANE); P E Z CASE %88-662
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE ~88-712: LEO CLIFFORD, 3185 PRIEST LANE, LOTS 7 & 8, BLOCK
2, HIGHLAND SHORES, PID ~23-117-24 34 0080/0081,
SETBACK VARIANCE AND MINOR SUBDIVISION
The Building Official explained the request and that the Planning
Commission had recommended approval.
Johnson moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %88-96
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVI-
SION AND SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOTS 7 &
8; BLOCK 2; HIGHLAND SHORES; PID %23-
117-24 34 0080/0081, (3185 PRIEST LJtNE);
P & Z CASE NO. 88-712
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE ~88-713:
ROGER BONNICKSEN; 4861/4855 DONALD DRIVE, LOTS 1,
24 & 25 ;BLOCK, ARDEN. PID ~24-117-24 44
0071/0091/0092; MINOR SUBDIVISION
The Building Official explained the request and that the Planning
Commission had recommended approval.
The City Attorney suggested adding the following 2 Conditions to
B:
99
If any, deficient sewer add water ulnit charges will be
assessed or paid at the time of the property lot
development.
An escrow amount to cover all legal and engineering
fees will be established.
Abel moved and Jessen seconded the following resclution:
RESOLUTZON ~88-97
RESOLUTZON TO I%PPROVE HINOR BUBDIVZBZON
FOR LOTS 1, 24 E 25, BLOCK 7, ~RDEN; PZD
~24-117-24 44 0071/0091/0092; 4861/4855
DONALD DRIVE; P & ~ CASE ~88-713
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 - PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY - SINGLE
TO THREE-PHASE POWER
The city Engineer explained that it would be cost effective for
the city to install a 3-phase panel for power to the new Public
Works Facility rather than the single phase that .was originally
considered. This installation would be for future use. The
Council agreed. He recommended the following:
Change Order %3 ....
Item No. 1
Elimination of Loading Dock
Deduct $1,050.00
Item No. 2
Change Electrical Service from
Single Phase to Three Phase
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
Johnson moved and Abel seconded the following
Add $1,775.00
$ 725.00
resolution:
RESOLUTION %88-98
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER %3,
PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY IN THE AMOUNT OF
$725.00
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY RE;'. CDBG FUNDS~ YEAR XIV - SENIOR
COUNSELING/CASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES
The City Manager explained that this resolution says ~he City ap-
prove support in Year XIV for the Senior Counseling/Case Manage-
ment Services.
100
June 28, 1988
Smith moved and Abel seconded the following r~solution=
RESOLUTION #88-99
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTIVE OF
PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SENIOR
COUNSELING/CASE I, fl~GE,.t~NT SERVICES WITH
SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AND AUTHORIZ-
ING ASSIGNMENT OF THE AGREEMENT'S
MINIBTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO HEN-
NEPIN COUNTY
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT_
There'were no comments or'suggestions.
~PPROVAL OF LICENSES
The following licenses were presented for approval:
Off-Sale Beer
A1 & Alma's
Brickley's Market
PDQ Food Store
SuperAmerica %4194
On-Sale. BeeF
A1 & Alma's
D'Vinci's ..
House of Moy
Mound Lanes & Pizza
Club License
American Legion %398
VFW %5113
On-Sale Liquor
Jock Club
Sunday Liquor
Jock Club
vFw %5113
Set-Up
A1 & Alma's
On-Sale Wine
A1 & Alma's
D'Vinci's
House of Moy
Dinner Dance
Jock Club
101
June 28, 1988
The Council asked if the VFW had comDlied-with the Building
Official's requirements onthe parking 10~ and the landscaping.
She reported they have installed th~ dumpster and because of the
dry conditions may not seed or sod until Fall or Spring.
MOTION made by,be1, seconded by Jensen to authorize the is-
suance of the above liste~ licenses as requested. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
SET DATES FOR PUBLIC HE~RINGB
P & Z CASE ~88-614 ·
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to set Jul~ 12,
1988, at 7=30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider a condi-
tional use permit for an overs/ze~ accessor~ building for
James Luger, 6195 Sinclair Road, Lot 6, Block 17, The
Highlands~ PID %23-117-24 34 0071. The vote was unanimousl~
in favor. Motion carried.
P & Z CASE #88-715
MOTION made b~ Abel, seconded b~ Jensen to set Jul~ 12,
1988, at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider the
vacation of a permanent slope easement for Jerome W. Stu~er,.
4455 Radnor Road, Lots 9 & 10,' Block 2, Pembroke~ PID %19-
117-23 34 0036. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
'carrle~.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY
The City Manager reported that he and the City Attorney have
worked on a policy and procedures regarding sexual harassment and
are presenting this to the Council tonight. The City Attorney
further stated that an allegation contained in a complaint has
been brought to the Minnesota Department of Human Rights by an
employee of the City and that the City is doing everything pos-
sible to maintain a work place free of any discrimination and of
any sexual harassment or intimidation by adopting this policy and
the procedures. The City Attorney has been working with the
Department of Human Rights to resolve the issue, but the employee
does not wish to meet with the City to reconcile and wants the
investigation to proceed. The City Manager stated this policy is
a good place to start and he is also requiring all department
heads to attend a seminar on June 30 regarding sexual harassment.
There will then be meetings with all employees regarding sexual
· harassment and the new policy and procedures if adopted.
Smith moved and Jensen Seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %88-100 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A POLICY AND PROCE-
DURES REGARDING SEXUAL HARASSMENT
102
June 28, 1988
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion ca,tied.
LEgISLaTION ALLOWIN~ ~CQUISITION ~ND, COND~WATION OF LaND
The Mayor presented a proposed resolution in support of the City
of Minnetrista and its legal challenge to legislation allowing
for the override of local approval from the acquisition and con-
demnation of land that was passed in the 1988 Legislative Ses-
sion. He stated he will be calling a meeting of the Lake Min-
ri.tonka Mayors in the near future to ask for their support also.
Smith moved and Abel seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~88-101
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE CITY oF
MINNETRISTA AND ITS LE~tL CHALLENGE TO
LEgISLaTION ~tLLOWIN~ FOR THE OVERRIDE OF
LOCAL APPRO~I%L FOR THE ACQUISITION AND
CONDEMNATION.OF L~ND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
P~YMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Jess.n, seconded by Abel to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the .amount
of $295,370.79, when funds are 'available. A roll oa11 vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLaNEOUS
A. Financial Report for May as prepared by Finance Director
John Norman.
B. LMC Federal Legislative Committee Membership Schedule..
C. REMINDERS=
- Economic Development Task Force Meeting, Thursday,
July 14 at 7:30 A.M., City Hall
- Park Commission and City Council Park Tour, Thursday,
July 28. Meet at 5:00 P.M., Senior Citizen Center -
will return at approximately 9:15 P.M. when pizza and
pop will be served - cost $5.50 per person.
De
Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation Summary for May 1988.
Notice of annual Dutch Treat 'Breakfast from Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission:
Date: June 29, 1988 - Wednesday
Time: 7:30 A.M.
Place: 'Lafayette Club
2800 Northview Road
103
June 28v 198~
Minnetonka Beach
F. Planning Commission Minutes from June 13, 1988
Ge
Draft of Housing Maintenance Code as prepared and discussed
by Subcommittee of Planning Commission and Planning Commis-
sion as a whole respectively. Council is requested to meet
jointly with Planning Commission on July 11, at 7:30 P.M. to
discuss draft of Housing Maintenance Code.
He
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) is looking
for persons to serve on legislative policy committees.
Please consider being a member of one of these committees.
Please let Fran know by June 3Q, so she can return applica-
tion forms. Also, attached is the Newsletter from AMM.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jessen to adjourn at 8:40
P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
BILLS ...... JUNE 28, 1988
Batch 806]
Batch 8062
230,633.71
64,022.76
Super Ameri ca
Nay gasoline 714.32
Total Bills 295,370.7g
Proposed Resolution
Case No. 88-614
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING EXCEEDING
840 SQUARE FEET OF TOTAL FLOOR AREA
AT 6195 SINCLAIR ROAD, PID~ 23-117-24 34 0071
WHEREAS, the C:cy Council on July 12, 1988 Feld a public
hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of
Ordinances to consider issuance of.6 Conditional Use Permit for
the construction of an oversized accessory garage building at
6195 Sinclair Road; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a
Conditional Use Permit to construct a 1,117 square foot detached
garage and Section 23.407 (3) of the Mound Zoning Code limits
such buildings to 840 square feet in size without issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned Two-family
Resid'ential iR-3) and garages are permitted accessory structures;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed garage is consistent with similar
structures on neighboring lots and the proposed garage meets all
setback requirements of the zoning code; and
WHERE'S, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request
and does recommend approval; an~
WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, that the Conditional Use Permit is
hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The garage shall be constructed in accordance with the
building plans dated 5-4-88 except as modified herein.
2. The garage building shall be used only for the storage
of vehicles, household goods, tools and lawn ar~- garden equipment and at no
time shall be used for livin9 quarters or any business purpose,
3. The ceiling height on the second floor shall be reduced
from an overall height of 8 feet 1'and 1/8 inches to 7 feet 5
inches.
HEARING NO]ICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ¥0 CONSIDER a
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY
BUILDING AT 6195 SINCLAIR ROAD; LOT 6, BLOCK 17,
THE HIGHLANDS; PID NUMBER 23-117-24 34 0071
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on Tuesday, July
1988, at 7:30 P.M. at the Mound City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road,
Mound, Minnesota, a hearing will be held to consider the
application For an oversized accessory building at 6195 Sinclair
Road legally described as follows:
Lot 6, Block 17, The Highlands; PID No. 23-117-24 34
0071
Ali persons appearing at said hearing will be given an
opportunity to be heard.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Publish in The Laker June 20, 1988.
CASE 88-614
Proposed Resolution
4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for the following legally
described property:
Lot 6, Block 17, The Highlands
PID #23-117-24 34 0071
This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorder
or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 462.3595, Subd. 4.
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used.
5. The property owner shall have the responsibility for filing this
resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such
recording. The Building Permit shall not be issued until proof of
recording has been filed with the City Clerk.
3030 Harbor Lane North
Bldg. II, Suite 104
Minneapolis, MN 5,5447-2175
612/553-1950
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Hark Koegler, City Planner~
DATE: June 20, 1988
SUBJ: Conditional Use Permit - Accessory Building
APPLICANT: James Luger
LOCATION: 6195 Sinclair Road
CASE NUMBER: 88-614
VHS FILE NUMBER: 88-310-AT-ZO
EXISTING ZONING: Two-family Residential (R-3)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking a conditional use permit to
construct a 1,117 square foot garage adjacent to his existing
house. Section 23.407 (3) 'of the Mound Zoning Code states "In
residential Districts, no accessory building shall exceed 10
percent of the lot area, and in no case exceed 840 square feet of
floor area except by conditional use permit." As a result of
this provision, Hr. Luger has filed the enclosed application for
conditional use permit approval.
The proposed building is a two story structure with dormers on
the front of the second floor. The first floor has an overall
dimen-sion of 24 by 28 feet and is designed for storage of two
vehicles. At the rear of the first floor, a staircase leads to
the second floor storage area which consists of approximately 500
square feet of additional area. The second floor contains
windows on the front and rear walls' and a door off of the rear
side.
In 1987, Mr. Luger filed an application with the City of Mound
for a variance to construct a second living unit above a two car
garage. The new storage space plan is essentially the same plan
that was reviewed and subsequently denied by the City Council on
August 11, 1988. Although the garage plan remains the same, the
new application proposes that the second floor only contain
storage space and the applicant has stated that he has no
intention of establishing a second dwelling unit.
Use of buildings for habitable space is governed in the City o.f
Hound by two primary documents: the zoning ordinance and the
Uniform Building Code. Zoning provisions do not allow the
proposed storage space to be used as living quarters. The
proposed space does qualify, however, under the UBC as habitable
space since the ceiling height exceeds .seven and one half feet
for over 50% of the area. This standard applies to spaces with
sloped ceilings which are part of the proposed garage plan. If
the second floor is to be used for only storage space, is an 8+
foot ceiling height absolutely necessary?
RECOMMENDATION: The proposed oversized garage is consistent with
the accessory buildings on each of the lots adjacent to the Luger
property. Additionally, the proposed structure is consistent
with the 10% lot coverage referenced in section 23.407 (3). The
only real concern remaining is the possibility of some future
conversion of the storage space to habitable space. The
applicant has stated that the space will not be used for living
quarters. If the property is sold in the future, the new owner
may clearly have a different idea regardless of the legality of
the use. Therefore, if approved by the City of Mound, it is
important that every effort be made to ensure that the new
building will always only be used for garage and storage
purposes.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for
construction of a new 1,117 square foot (approx) garage on the
James Luger property at 6195 Sinclair Road subject to the
following conditions:
1. The garage shall be constructed in accordance with the
building plans dated 5-4-88 except as modified herein.
2. The garage building shall be used only for the storage of'
vehicles and household goods and at no time shall be used for
living quarters or any business purpose.
3. The ceiling height on the second floor shall be reduced from
an overall height of 8 feet I and 1\8 inches to 7 feet 5 inches
thereby making the space permanently illegal as habitable space
as defined by the Uniform Building Code.
Case No. ~?-~;.
CITY OF MOUND Fee Paid
APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION
(Please type the following information)
1. Street Address of Property
Date Fi led,
2. Legal Descrlpt~on of Property:
Addition H1gh!an~s
3. Owner's Name ~[m Lurer
Address
Lot 6
6195 Sine!sir Roa~, Moun~, Mn. 55364
Block. 17
PID No. 23-117-2[t ~ 0071
Day Phone No. $71-0891
Appllcant' (if other than owner):
Name
Address
Day Phone No.
5. Type of Request:
( ) Variance (X) Conditional Use Permit
( ) Zoning Interpretation S Review
( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D.
( ') Amendment
( ) Sign Permit
( )*Other
*if otheK, specify:
Present Zoning District
7. Exlstlng Use(s) of Property
.~omici]e
8. Has an application ever oeen made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or
other zoning procedure for this property? 7es If so, list date(s) of
list date(s) of application, action taken an~ p,:~vide Resolution No.(s)
Aool. 6/2b/BT...,.no resolution fnrm rec'v~
Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany Fresent request.
I certify that all of the above statements and th& statements contained in any required
papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in
or upon the pr~mises described in this application by any authorized official of the City
of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by law. ..,,,
Sigqature of Appl leant d ~-,/~-O , .~.~{ .---~ Date 5/26/88
Planning Commission Recommefi 'on:
Date
Council Action:
Resolution No.
,
Date
Procedure for Conditional Use Permit (2)
Case #,, ?~- ~//~'
D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
E. Indicate North compass direction.
F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff
and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
III Request for a Conditional Use
A. All information requested below, a site plan as described in Part II, and
a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for the completion
of the construction must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled.
B. Type of development for which a Conditional Use Permit is requested:
1. Conditional Use (Specify): Garage with storage lo£t
Current Zoning and Designation in the future Land Use Plan for Hound
Do
Development Schedule:
1. A development schedule shall be attached to this application providing
reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development.
2. Estimate of cost of the project=. $
Density {for residential developments only):
1. Number of structures=
2. Dwelling Units Per Structure=
a. Number of type:
Efficienc~ ' 1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom
3. Lot area per dwelling unit=
/4. Total lot area=
IV. Effects of the Proposed Use
List~impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, in-
cluding, but not limited to traffic, noise, 1.ight, smoke/odor, parking,
and, describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the Impacts.
No negacive !mpect
Besl~em beautifying the nefghborhoo~ the new garage will have
a safer ~rlveway which will exten~ to al,most the full width
of the lot. This will make for much safer entrance on Sinclair
Rna~, which is view obstructem now°
GARAGES...
design
664
2 Car Garage With Loft
Orlglnolly designed with attractive
dormers to give o Colonial look, this
design is also attroctlve if you omit the
dormers. Its generous size provides
plenty of storage. The loft is an'ideal
hobby oreo. ,
9
2 RIDGEWOOD
CITY
/' CI'y
i
OF MINNETRISTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 27, 1~88
uase No. 8~-~14 PUBLIC HEARING to consider a Conditional Use
Permit.~or an oversized accessory building at 6195 Sinclair
'Roadt Lot 6, Block 17, The Highlands~ PID No. 23-117-24 34
0071
Shirley Luger was present.
The City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his report stating that
applicant is proposing to build an 1117 square ~oot garage. He
needs a Conditional b~e Permit because any accessory building
e×ceeding 840 square ~eet under the Zoning Ordinance i~ required
to get a CUP. The proposed structure is two story with dormers
on ~ront oE second ~loor; 1st Eloor is 24 by 28 ~eet and 2nd
~loor is about 500 square ~eet o~ additional space which
applicant states will be storage-area. Previously Mr. Luger
applied Eot a variance to lot size to establish a second legal
housing unit above what would have been the garage building.
This plan is the same, but does not include the living space and
applicant has stated he has no intention o~ establishing a second
dwelling unit. Use o~ buildings ~or habitable space is governed
by the zoning ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. Zoning
provisions do not allow the proposed storage space to be used as
living quarters. However, under the UBC code, it is a habitable
area because the ceiling height is sufficient to meet' code as
habitable space. Mark recommended that the ceiling height be
reduced thereby making the space permanently illegal as habitable
space (with slanted roo~, 50% o~ area has to e×ceed 7 1/2 ~eet)
ensuring that the new building will always be used only
garage and storage. He is recommending approval subject to the
three conditions in his report.
It was questioned iE placing the proposed garage over sewer and
wa=em tines was a problem. Mark stated that, being on private
property, it was owner's own risk; or they could run lines around
the building.
The Chairman opened the public hearing, de~ Luger stated they
have no problem with the 7'~°' second ~loor ceiling height. There
were no other comments ~rom the audience, the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
Wetland ~oved and Andersen seconded a motion to accept the
sta~ recommendations with the agreement that the old garage
be torn down and moved out. Allowed storage is to include
vehicles, household goods, tools and lawn and garden equipment.
The Commission discussed the intent oE a CUP ~or a private garage
and also i~ requiring the lo, er roo~ was necessary.
The vote on the motion was ali in ~avor.
This will be on the City Council agenda duly 12, 1988.
~K.~O~UT~ON NO, 88-
RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT
OVER LOT 10, BLOCK 2, PEMBROKE
PID #ig-il?-Z }4 0036
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City Council
may be resolution vacate any easement when it appears in the interest of the
public to do so; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mound has claimed a permanent slope easement for
construction of slopes of cuts and fills over the following described land:
Lot 10, Block 2, PEMBROKE, according to the recordedplat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on Ouly 12, 1988, as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that said easement is no longer required
and good area planning requires that this easement be vacated and that it would
be in the public interest to do so.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, hereby vacates the following easement:
A permanent easement for the construction of slopes of cuts and fills over
and across the westerly ~0 feet of Lot lC, Block 2, PEMBROKE, according to
the recorded plat thereof;
A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared by the City Clerk and
shall be a Notice of Completion of the proceedings and shall De recorded in the
Office of the County Recorder and/or the Registrar of Titles, as set forth in
M.S.A. 412.851.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION
OF EASEMENT DESCRIBED AS "THE WESTERLY 30 FEET
OF LOT 10, BLOCK 2, PEMBROKE" (4455 RADNOR ROAD)
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, ~hat on Tuesday, July
1988, at 7:30 P.M. at the Mound City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road,
Mound, Minnesota, a hearing will be held to consider the vacation
oF a perpetual easement over the Following described land (4455
Radnor Road):
The Westerly 30 Feet of Lot 10, Block 2,' Pembroke
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to
above will be heard at this meeting.
Francene C. ciar~,-City Clerk
Publish in The Laker June 20, 1988.
Mc-Combs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Twin Cities St. Cloud
15050 23rd Ave. N. Telephone Engineers
Plymouth, MN 612/476-6010 Planners
55441 Surveyors
Oune 14, 1988
Ms. Oan Bertrand
Planning & Zoning
City of Hound
5341 Maywood Road
Hound, HN 55364
SUBOECT:
Vacation of Slope Easement
Lot 10, Block 2, Pembroke
HFRA #2113
Dear Jan:
As requested, we have reviewed the application to vacate a permanent slope
easement over the west 30 feet of Lot 10, Block 2, Pembroke. The existing
house on this'lot is located partially within this easement and was there at
the time the easement ~as given to the City for construction of Tuxedo
Boulevard. We see no reason for the City to retain this easement; therefore,
we would recommend apprcval of the vacation.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
US.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Oohn Cameron
OC:aju
F3rm,ari':, MtCombs-Knutson ~.~..,. ~- .... I. ,~
' ' :''~ #171
~ · '"' q~ ~"~ I~,~E :3/~ :
~ ~" APPLICATION FOR ~ VACATION
.;:..:~, 8 '- ~' .
~/~.6~ ...... ~ .... CITY OF HOUND FEE
.... , _
~APPLICANT~'~~ ~.~t% ~_~%~_~.~,S~ ~~ DATE FILED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: PID
LOT ~~ BLO:K ~'
ADDRESS '~~
Applicant's Interest in Property
t
T,EL. NO.
Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated:
(Please/attach list. Certified mailing list can be obtained from
Hennepin County by calling 3q8,3271)
Recommended by Utilities: NSP
; Minnegasco
,,; Continental 'Telephone
Recommended by City:
Public Works ; Fire Chief ,, .; Engineer
; Police
-Chief ; Cable Systems. ; Other Departments
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Date
Council Action
Resolution No, Date
%
lo~d, do h~by ~t aua couvey ~ the ~i~ ~y
e~=t
ovor ~ n~ the
The ~terly
to th$ recorded pl~ thereo~.
·
Ceccrtb~d Ln t~- 6~cu~nt u~)on vhtch the nlolx~ c~
cud f£11~ nr~ to b9 c=-ot.-u~ted ~o ~o re~Lu
~ 1~~ U--~C~, th~ ~ld ~ te~ lmve_ hereunto
Kemper & Assoclate~
Innsbruck Office Park (Silver Lake Fid. & 694)
2722 Highway 694
New Brighton. MN 55112
Telephone (612) 631-0351
SURVEYOR 'S CERTIFICATE
SURVEY OF Lots 9 & 10 of PEMBROKE.
Henr, epin County, N~nnesota
(4455 Radnor Road, Hound, Minnesota)
LO7- /I
LOt I0 \ LOT 9
t
L 07' /5
Oo
,.O7'
LEGEND
® Found lron ?iDe
(~) Reco:'~ed fynm
previous survey
"~tq~ tqeasured this
s~rvey
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 27, 1988
Case No. 88-715 PUBLIC HEARING on Vacation o~ Permanent
Slope Easement (4455 Radnor Road>; Lots 9 and lO, Block
PembrokeI PID # 19-117-23-34 0036
Virginia Lord representing owner, Jerome W. Studer, Nas
present.
o°
The City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed John Cameron~s letter
and gave background on easement. He stated issue goes back to
1~67 or 19~8 when street improvements were done. The City got a
slope easement over a portion o~ let that already had a house on
it. Lot ll is owned by the City and is where the slope actually
is. The sta~ can see no reason ~or the City to retain this
ease~,ent and recommends approval o~ the vacation.
The Chairman opened the pub;it hearing. Virginia Lord stated
this easement puts a cloud on the title and makes quite a
hardship ~or the owner. No other persons had comments, so the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
Andersen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to vacate the
slope easement recommended by the sta~. The vote was all in
~avor~ motion carried.
The public hearing will be held by the City Council on duly 12th.
Commissioner Weiland asked to have John Cameron write a brie~
paragraph giving e×planation/de~inition o~ slope easement.
BUZaI~ PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Miz~et:on~a
RECEIVEDOF Steven a. and Beth Homola as~usband
and Wife
~Che~k~N~e-S~Which~a~a~m~m~y~in~r~D~yme~X~h~Du~c~1~{t~.~)por~ya~ Government Lot 4
['~STEDG~ RO~. MOUND M~
, stt~t~mt~tyof ~NN .StlleofMi~Lo~ally~ri~OlJ~.tOwd: *SEE SUPPL~
~me~, tln~, llOkorl ~ ~ ~ut~l u~ Iff ~n~lofl t~mwlth), water ~fl~ l~ IIQUI0 gal t~k ~ ~l~ll (If t~ ~y of ~,
I~m~ pum~, IIIl~lllon ~lnn~ In;l~ll~, ~lll.ln ~llhWll~f I~ ga~gl ~11~111. b~lll-ln e~l, ~llt .In ~k top m~, iii ill~ ml~,
s~t~la~of:S24. 000.00
Wfl.a.~i.~o..~,~mCONTRACT FOR P_~D fi~ag.umm~at.
SubjeCt tO Pedom~J~a bY lite I)uyw Ihe oell~ agrle~ 1o execute and delJvw a
{to ~ ~ In ~ ~. If any) ~ ~tl~ lll~ to ~M ~i.~k~; ~ly lo I~ f~ ex~: ~ W~
(I) ~l~i~ I~ ~i~ ~, Ni~, State ~ FMI ~uMt~.
lc} ~mlt~ of i~ m6~lll ~ mabel flgh~ to t~ Stile ~ M~tL
~,~yt~PRO~T~ FR~ C~OSING '
~o~?; ?o CLOS;~G ' '
~ll~ tO =l~i~, Iff. ~)
I~lth. ~1~ wl~*fltl t~t fill ~t.te I~fl Om M 1~ ~r 19.8 9 will ~ NON
ffull, M~lll, ~ ~..late ~) ~te~ ~l~f~l~.
Any ~iil II~tl ~
NoiI~ t~ ~ll~ ~ t~ NIIIti ipnt ~kt I~ m~tlt~ ~ Wlflflty ~l~r ~mlq t~ I~fll of r~l .tile tel. ~1~ ~11 ~ I1~
_. ~lter C~nlflll t~t ~lldtql.
L~ATED ON ~ID PREMIS~ ARE IN P~PER WORKING ~DER AT DATE OF ~NG, AIR ~ND~IONING, WIRING AND ~UM~NG ~ED AND
~lior wi.anti Ihll city ~r il iff t~ IIrNt, Y~ ~ NO ~ end c~fl~l~ Io t~ h~N, y~ ~ NO ~, a~ t~t city water Il Iff t~ ItrNt,
Yes: No ~ I~ C~l~ Io
T~ ~lllr fu~ IgrNI lO ~1~
pli~ with. Uflllll Ot~i~ ~If~ Ihll
T~ ~ a~ ~1~ II~ murkily
~"'~"~.~.~,~,,f_ DAY OF POSSESSION
T~ ~l~f I~11, wilhl~ I ll~l
clude pro~r Nimbi CMd~ ~nkruptclel. a~ Stats i~ F~rll judge~flll a~ I~ni. h ~r shall ~ IIl~ 10 ~ IflW ~etpt t~ ~ ex~i~
title I~ wilhin I0 dl~ Ifllr w~ittln ~ll~ 10
If Slid title ti ~ ml~lllbll I~ ii ~1 N~ K within 1~ (b~ f~ t~ dell 0f ~tl~ ~jKti~s l~rll0 II I~ ~l~, this Ig~t I~11 ~ n~l
acid proH~y ~ f0u~ ~ltlbll U H K mi~ wJlhi~ ~ld tl~, I~ said ~yor shall clef lull in Iny 0f I~ 1Orfl~fltI I~ C~tin~ iff ~flult t~ I ~ 0f 10
I~ Il d agent Is l~, NIHCl;q Inllflltl ely IpHIr. 11 hQmdltK dlmlfll, ti~ ~Jng of t~ IIH~Cl ~r~f. ~il ~llt~ ~11 ~ ~j~ IIt~ H~Y of
In t~ ;v;R; of I bu~¢l (bloult ~un~r, ;;::G; rely IxG~:. ~t~y ~: i~ttM ~th m ~ day ~1~ ~fl~, Iff h e~t of lay ~H--
(bflull. Ml~ll [~b llill~ll~t will ~1 mikl i Iqll Iflll~llll~ of iffy ~ll~l mllllq Io ~llbumm~ of ~lmtl m~
Buyer mck~wlodgol ~ mtmtomflt8 hive
basement, or damage cmuiod by water or Joe I~lld.ul ~a h roof of thl abovo (bM)db ~. uflJall W~ ~ mttoM ~d~ ~d t~t
buyer ~llll oilily u~ M~ll tnl~l~ of l~ ~fly I~ ~ h Iollo~ mt~te~ by ~ molbt bll~ ~ I M
balo~m. I~ ~T~ hod ~f, will ~ Nlll~ dlmi~ ~l~ ~ ~ M WorM. b~l ~
~k ~
~ B~yor Ick~el bllor boo ~ ~vlM o statement M ~fly ~lll~ I~ B~t MI~I O01elr ~ hie ~ IfllWl~ OI h ~.
1
bllo~l) Ifl~llll ~ B~Odl) Initials
II il underst~ and aore~ Ihlt this sill il ml~e lubject lo tho ~il ~ t~ loller Of slid premises, iff willing which Ipprovll, I~t his ,.
days to obtain, mad that the undersigned agent Js iff no mo,er liable or res~nliblo on account of this ogr~meflt, except lo return or accent fM the earnest
money Paid under this contrlcl.
T~ LIiII~ o~flt M I~lll~ ~M Ill.oils ~1 ~iM Il m~oeflti~ ~ seller In INs tron.~l~..
I Oeh~fy Of III Ol~li i~ ~l shall ~ ~ Il t~ OIIICl el: . MERRILL ~ GH REA TY/ ~ INC
.
."7 ;' , · "'-- .............. ," '0 ." -..,...;
Dlle
THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, IF NOT UNDERSTOOD, SEEK CO~P~ENT LEGAL ADVICE,
FIHAHCING SUPPLEMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Contract for Deed
closing of ~uyers presen: home at 6690 Co~t~side Dr.
~den Prairie, whichever comes first.
ADDmONAL TERMS AND CONDmONS
~5~ "~ ft ?..,-,",,,,,,~_ ,,,',~ ,,,.,~,.,.'.,,.,.-,~ +.~.,,,- ,.~,.'- ........ . _.,_ ,-_ ; .... ,,-t .... ,,- .... . ,-~. c,,..,, ,.,,,..,.,:
able to acquire an easement for street and utliltv ~uroost from the eroDerty o~ner
directly west of thls parcel. In~ress and egress to the property shall be over said
easement to Westedge Road. The City shall have 30 days after the signing of this
agreement to acquire sald easement. It Is furthe~ understood and a~reed that the Buyer '.
shall be aJlowed to drlll a well to supply water to the home to be constructed on the
prem&s~s. The deed conveyin~ the property shall restrict and limit the property from
further subdivision or development untll comolete munlcl0al utilities' are available' to
the property and the property may have only one residence ontthe premises until
comolete munlclpa) utilities are constructed. See Attached Leaal ~e~crlntlon.
THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD, SEEK COMPETENT LEGAL ADVICE.
ORIOlNAL--Ch:~ingO~, COPYl--Sellm' COPY2--~yer COPY3--Lt~flngAssoCllll CO~Y4--~eningAs~ciltt CO~"S--Mo~gI~e
ADDENDUM TO
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BLANK
This form approved by the Minnesota Association of,
REALTORS~: Minnesota Association of REALTOR~
disclaims ;iny liability arising out of use or misuse of this form.
1. Date 6/27/88
2. Page 3. of I Pagus
3. AddendumtoPurchaseAgmementbe~eenpa~iesdmed 5/8
4, and sale ofthe property m?hat part of lot 4 l¥±nq northerly o[ the railway
5. right of way sec. 23 Townshio 117 Ranqe 24 ~enneoin county
P.I.D. #231172422005
6.
,19 8 8 pertaining to the purchase
7.
o
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
To be revised as £o~]ow.~.- .~V~r ~n~ ~mllm~' mg~ tO ~_Y_t_~n_~
contingency regarding the cities ability to aouire inqress
agress to the property described above, the city of ~ound
shall have until July 15~1988 to aquire said access,
Should c~ty be unable to' aquire said access by July 15,1988
the buyer at his option, may declare the purchase agreement
null and void and have earnest money r~urned.
15.
16.
17.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33. '
34.
35.
(Buyer)
36.
(,Seller)
38. MN:APA (5~88)
(Date) (Buy, r)
THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRAUT BETWEEN BUYERS AND SELLERS.
IF YOU DESIRE LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE, CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL.
McC, ombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Twin Cities St. Cloud 15050 23rd Ave. N. Telephone
Plymouth, MN 612/476-6010
55441
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Ouly 7, 1988
Mr. Edward 3. Shukle, Or., City Manager
City of Hound
5341 Maywood Road
Hound, MN 55364
SUBOECT: Public Works Facility
HFRA #8275
Dear Ed:
Enclosed is Loeffel-Engstrand's Payment Request No. 2 for work completed
through Oune 30, 1988 on the subject project. The amount of this payment
request is $190,616.55.
We have reviewed this request and find that it is in order and recommend
payment in the above amount to the Contractor.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Sincerely,
McCOMBS FRANK R00S ~SOCIATES, INC.
Steven W. Oantze~', P.E~", A.I.A
SO:aju
Enclosure
Formerly McCombs~Knutson Associates, Inc,
/~ do
TO.'
FROH =
DATE .-
SUBJECT
MEMORANDUM
Ed Shukle, City Manager
Jim Fackler
July 12, 1988
Commercial Weed Harvesting
With the low water level that we are experiencing on Lake Mtn-
netonka, the commercial weed harvesting companies are loQking For
areas to use as a removal site. In the City of Mound, I have
seen them trying to use the city beaches, parks and launch areas.
They have been doing this without notifying the city.
On July 2nd (Saturday of the 4th or'July weekend), I received a
call from Officer Bostrom that a weed harvesting company, Beach
Barbers, had set up a dump truck with a conveyer at Mound Bay
Park between the boat launch and the swimming beach, on the park.
! instructed OFFicer Bostrom to have them remove their equipment.
My reasoning was, First, they were operating on public property
without approval From the city, second, that I was not familiar
with their operation and had a concern about the safety of park
visitors, third, that they were tying up the boat launch on a
holiday weekend, fourth, that the stacking of the weeds would
smell and was unsightly for holiday visitors, and, last, that it
would disturb residents who live nearby.
I have been contacted by citizens of Mound about the use of the
city's property by Beach Barbers for weed harvesting. The Beach
Barbers are currently under contract with the City of Minneapolis
for the Aquatennial, and have been since the early part of July.
I have talked to the owner of Beach Barbers and he will meet with
me as soon as he can to discuss his operation and how we can help
with a site, as well as what site might be appropriate. I an-
ticipate meeting with him sometime in the next ? days.
The level of Minnetonka might be a problem for the rest of the
summer, so this type of weed harvesting will be in need of an
area from time to time. ! cannot predict how much demand there
is going to be, nor vouch for the quality of the various weed
harvesting companies. We have seen in past, for example, one
outfit drop about 15 yards of weeds on Pembrook Beach for three
days and park a 10 yard dump truck in the beach area during beach
hours.
There are four things that I feel should be done to allow access
over city property:
(1)
All contractors should have a DNR license
for the area being done.
Commercial Weed Harvesting Memo
July 12, lg88
(2)
(3)
(4)
Contracting work should not conflict with
daily park use.
The city should be notified of the trans-
portation of new strains of weeds that are
being harvested on city sites so that new
areas will not be affected.
The shoreline being d~ne should fall within
the City of Mound limits.
JF/sk
.I
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Twin Cities St. Cloud
15050 23rd Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN
55441
July 7, 1988
Telephone
612/476-6010
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Ns. Jan Bertrand
Planning and Zoning Department
Cityof Hound
5341 Naywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
Grading Application
Anthony Van Der Steeg Property
1861 Commerce Boulevard
HFRA #7279
Dear OaR:
As requested, we have revieweo the most recent application for filling a
portion of the old treatment ponds behind Anthony's Floral, and have the
following comments and recommendations. As you are aware, the area proposed to
be filled is contiguous to the area which Anthony's was using as a fill site a
few years ago. A permit was issued to Hr. Van Der Steeg, then revoked after
the conditions of the permit were not followed. The permit was then
reinstated, contingent upon certa~ conditions being met. To our knowledge,
there has been no activity on this site for the last two years, which in itself
would void the last permit. Enclosed are copies of the previous resolutions.
If the property owner and the City of Hound wish to view this area as
virtually unbuildable in the future, then we see no problem allowing :his
filling without meeting the normal requirements such as soil borings,
compaction tests, etc. However, if the City wishes to follow the requirements
of the building code (Appendix 70) and assume the fill ares is intended to some
day support structures, then very different guidelines need to be met.
Our recommendation, based on the past history of this site, would be to
grant this fill permit, if the following conditions are met:
1. Fill area is graded and seeded upon completion.
e
Silt screen to be installed between fill area and lake if fill placed
is higher than existing dike separating the old pond from Dutch Lake.
Permits to be ac§.uired from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and
DNR. ~ ~ d ~/~'~8'
Very truly yours,
OC: jmj
Enclosure
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Oohn Cameron
Formerly McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc
37
February 18,,1~86'
RESOLUTION NO. 86-21
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A GRADING AND LAND
RECLAMATION PERMIT AND ESTABLISHING RESTRICTIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council granted a permit to fill and
reclaim certain land by a Resolution adopted September 25, 198q,
and numbered Resolution No. 8q-150 and said resolution
established certain criteria and requirements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 85-152
on November 26, 1985, suspending the grading and land reclamation
permit because Mr. VanDerSteeg has not received a Watershed
Permit and because materials containing decayable matter had been
placed on the site; and
WHEREAS,-this Council haS told Mr. VanDerSteeg that the
permit will not be reinstated until he comes into compliance by
obtaining a Watershed Permit and removes the decayable materials
and he now indicates an opportunity to obtain good soils; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to cooperate with Mr.
VanDerSteeg but does not want him to proceed until he obtains his
Watershed Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the'Cit~ of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
The permit described in Resolution No. 8q'150 is
reinstated subject to the following conditions:
Obtaining a permit with the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District.
Stockpiling can then be allowed by the City
Engineer. and the City Manager if they have
established conditions whick will assure that
the applicant -will meet the standards
established by the Watershed District and
Resolution No. 8q-150 and a final grading plan
has been approved by the City Engineer.
The materials to be stored on the site shall'
be limited in quantity and quality to meet the
grades and soil conditions established by the
Watershed District, the prior resolution and
the~City Engineer.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Paulsen and seconded by Councilmember Smith.
February 18, 1R86
The following ¢ouneflmember$ voted in the ~fflrm~tlve:
Jessent ?aulsent Feter~on~ Folston and Sm~h. -'
.The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Attest: City Clerk
~70.0'
o
56':;.6 7 '
" of ~.he North
that *vis 5s a t~',,~ ant c.orr~:et "~ .... ~r.-~l',*?r~ 0~' ~ ~,m~'ey of t~'e bouncariqs
.... '' " ' LOt distant 6~.02 feet
_u~OWS: ~'.~iI~Jn;j ~t ~ ').~in~ on '2;u North L]:~e ~
i~st line :%?: th,~ :mSn- oF bogS. rmir~; 'nemco ';or~}~ ~ *~:.' ~ir.~ of ~in:ting, to~ethe:r ~'i~
!n~ress ard e~.,ss ~...n(, C/'ivow,.;- ~ur'~oscs over ~%:,¢ ~r.-~'- ~( r'~- of thc W,.~rt 2L() feet cf s=iJ
L[I exls%ing b~i,tf_ni s t~erer:n. It .does ucc ~u~rt to sho~' other improvc:rsn~n or encro:;e~
: 1CO'
....
· Z9 '84
GORDON R. COFFI, CO.,
247 ·
November 26, 1985
RESOLUTION NO. 85-152
RESOLUTION TO SUSPEND THE GRADING AND LaND
RECLAMATION PERMIT OF ANTHONY VANDERSTEEG,
1861 COMMERCE BLVD.
WHEREAS, on September 25, 1984, the City Council issued
a Grading and Land Reclamation Permit (Resolution $84-150) to Mr.
Anthony VanDerSteeg, 1861 Commerce Blvd. 'to fill behind the
aforementioned address; and
-WHEREAS, on November 12, 1985, the City Counc'il passed
Resolution #85-143, regarding the above mentioned Grading and
Land Reclamation Permit.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL1/ED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby suspend the Grading and
Land' Reclamation Permit until such time as Mr. VanDerSteeg..
oomplies with the original conditions in Resolution #84-150;
and the conditions in Resolution #84-143.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councllmember
Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Paulsen.
The'following Councilmembers voZed in the affirmative:
.Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson, Polston and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Ma~y o r -,
Attest: City Clerk
237
November 12, 1985
RESOLUTION NO. 85-143'
RESOLUTION REGARDING GRADING AND LAND RECLAMATION
PERMIT OF ANTHON~ VANDERSTEEG, 1861 COMMERCE BLVD.
WHEREAS, on September 25, 1984, the City Council issued
a Grading and Land Reclamation Permit (Rsolution 884-150) to Mr.
Anthony VanDerSteeg, 1861 Commerce Blvd. to fill behind the
aforementioned address; and
WHEREAS, on November 5, 1985, the City Engineer and the
Building Inspector inspected the area behind 1861 Commerce Blvd.
and found at least 5 violations of the 9 conditions in Resolution
#84-150; and
WHEREAS, of major concern, is the dumping of construction
· debris that contains materials which will' support decay such as
plywood, boards, sheetrock, acoustical tile, cardboard, paneling,.
· hardboard siding, carpet, foam pads, brush, trees and other
material which probably will never decompose such as plastic,
metal and P.V.C. pipe, tires, steel studs, concrete block, brick
and fiberglass insulation; and
WH-EREAS, Mr. VanDerSteeg has never completed the
requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and has
not received a permit from them; and
WHEREAS, soil boring have never been provided to the
City from Mr. VanDerS~eeg which was also a condition of the
Permit; and
WHEREAS, it has now been discovered that there is an old
concrete control structure in the dike between the old treatment
ponds and Dutch Lake which has an open top on it and should have
a solid, permanent cover placed over it so it is not a.hazard to
children in the area; and
WHEREAS, th~ 'City Engineer 'and the Building Inspector
have recommended that the Permit be revoked until the following
three conditions are.met:
1. All unacceptable material be removed from the site.
2. The owner posts a bond in the amount of $10,000.00 to
insure that all conditions of the permit are met.
'3. The owner follow thru and secure a permit from the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, asked that the following conditions
be met:
1. Mr. VanDerSteeg to work with the Staff on a plan of
action and timetable for removing the illegal fill
238
November 12, 1985
and report back to the Council in 2 weeks.
2. Suspend any further dumping until there is a plan o~
action for the next year and all requirements of the
original Permit are met.
Mr. VanDerSteeg to find out who dumped the ill.egal
materials.
Cover the concrete structure on the rear of the
property with exterior plywood.
5. Have the soil testing done.
6. Obtain the necessary permit from the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District.
The foregoing 'resolution was moved by Councilmember.
~aulsen and seconded by Councilmember Peterson.
The following Councilmembe~s voted in'the affirmative:
Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Mayor Polston was absent and excused.
Mayor Pro Tem
Attest: City Clerk ...-.
September 25, 1984
RESOLUTION NO. 84-150
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A GRADING AND LAND
RECLAMATION PERMIT FOR GOVERNMENT LOT 1,
SECTION 1~-117-24 (PID ~14-117-2~ 14 0003)
WHEREAS.~~Ie ~ii_~~:~-e~_me~-of the property
described aset~e~~h~435 feet of Government Lot 1, Section 14-
117-24 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, EXCEPT that part
thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North
line of said lot distant 606.62 feet West from the Northeast
corner of said lot; thence East to the Northeast corner of said
lot; thence South along the East line of said lot a distance of
165 feet; thence West parallel with said North line to an
intersection with a line drawn South parallel with said East line
from the point of beginning; thence North to the point of
beginning, together with an easement. Tot ingress and egress and
driveway purposes over the South 50 feet of the Weset 246 feet of
said excepted tract, and the location of all existing buildings
thereon. PID~#14-117-24 14 0003;~~6~a grm~
land reclamation permit pursuant to the City Code, Section
35.200 ;') and
WHEREAS, City Staff has review'ed the request and does
recommend approval with stipulated~conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
does hereby approve the requested grading and reclamation permit
for the Anthonie VanDerSteeg ~property as stated on ~he attached
Exhibit "A" with the following conditions:
'The Exhibit "A" fill area be adhered to by the applicant
with the silt fencing installed at the perimeter
continuously and maintained in good condition.
Seeding or sodding shall be accomplished by October 1,
1986, or when the filling is completed, whichever date
is sooner.
The fill material that has been placed will have all.
material rsmoved that will support decay. At the
recommendation of the Building Official, a soils
engineering firm will be retained and a report submitted
to the City Engineer to verify compliance of this at the
owner's expense. .,
Submit. to the City Engineer any other required permits;
i.e. Watershed District. o~~
No further fill material will support decay with a l'ot
(or record) to be kept by the property owner of future
fill to be used stating the date received, where the
September 25, 1984
fill was transported from, the name-of the transporter
and the number of yards received.
The owner is required to provide garbage/refuse service
by an independent service for his floral and home u~.
Erosion and dust control shall be by the use of haybales
staked and secured in place or equal and dust ccntrol as
approved by the City Engineer and Minnehaha Creek Water-
shed District·
This permit will expire October 1, 1986, or. may be
renewed by the City Manager·
The permit is non-transferable to a new property owner
and it may be revoked after nptifioation to the property
owner.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Charon and seconded by Coun¢l!member Jessen. .
The following Counoilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polston.
The following Councilmembers voted in t]~e negative:
none.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
GRADING.APPLICATION
PERMIT NUHBER:
. . ~
SITE ADDRESS:
LEGAL
(See reverse side for instructions)
NUHBER OF CUBIC"YAROS TO BE HovED.
BONO REQUIRED.: $
I hereby acknowledge ~hat ! have-read this ap'pllcatlon, and state that the informa-
tion is correct and agree to comply with the. City of Hounds.Codes and t,he,,...' Sta~'ei'Of~-~~ 'i
Mi nnesota Laws. ~. . * :,:'~ ~:~. ;~ ~;.~F./-'-~)~i '
· , ...... . __ ~ / ~ ~/2 ' . ,~ '~ ; 't'"',". y "F..~7 .,i: ·
.OWNER:~~ ~/'~ ~~ ~ SUnature of JUL 6 Ig~n ~';
FE.E:' $
PLAN CHECKING FEE
GRADING PERMIT FEE
TOTAL FEE $
APPROVED BY
PERMIT TO EXP'IRE WITHIN 1 YEAR OR 180 DAYS AFTER FILL PLACEltENT IS DISCONTINUED.
Informatlon to be included:
1. Type of f111 to be placed.
Time schedule of completion of work-.
Purpose of work/fili..-
Proposed surface restoration ....
.Describe erosion control measures;
'i-f kc_
tt II
resolution#88-105
EXHIBIT "A"
JUNE 27, 1988
MAINTENANCE DREDGING SPOILS AREA
THE ENCLOSED ANNOTATED TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED
SPOIL STORAGE AREA SHOWS ACTUAL TOPOGRAPHY AS WELL AS A
PREVIOUS SUPERIMPOSED FILL PLAN (SOLID LINES). FOR THIS
DREDGING PROJECT THE LOW AREA LABELED "A" IS PROPOSED TO BE
PARTIALLY FILLED WITH THE SOIL FROM THE PROJECT. THE LOW
AREA LABELED "C" (WHICH EXTENDS 70 FT FURTHER TO THE SOUTH
TO A BANK HIGHER THAN THE BERM ON THE WEST AND NORTH SIDES)
IS PROPOSED TO BE USED AS A HOLDING POND FOR PROJECT WATER
DRAINED FROM AREA "A".
THE BERM ON THE WEST AND NORTH SIDE OF AREA "C" WAS
CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN WATER. ABOUT 19S5-1962 AREA "C" WAS
USED AS AN AERATION POND FOR EFFLUENT FROM A SEPTIC SYSTEM
FOR A MOUND SCHOOL, NOW GRANDVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL. SEWERS
WERE INSTALLED AND THE PONDS USE STOPPED ABOUT 1962.
IT IS PROPOSED THAT A 5 FOOT SECTION OF THE BERM AT POINT
"B" BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK TO CREATE A
GRAVEL FILTER TO ALLOW SETTLING OF THE SOIL AND DRAINAGE OF
WATER OVERFLOW TO AREA "C".
THE DISCHARGE POINT FOR THE DREDGED SOIL AND WATER WILL BE
AT POINT "D", THE OPPOSITE CORNER FROM THE WATER DISCHARGE
POINT "B".
APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR A FILLING/GRADING PERMIT
FOR THIS SPECIFIC PROJECT FROM THE CITY OF MOUND SIGNED BY
THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.
IN AREA "A" THE AVERAGE DEPTH OF THE SOIL IS ESTIMATED TO BE
3.3 FT. IN AREA "C" THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF THE WATER IS
ESTIMATED TO BE 2 TO 3 FT.
THE BERM SEPARATING AREA "A" FROM AREA "C" IS AT 945, THE
BERM TO THE WEST IS AT 947. TEMPORARILY A BERM WILL BE
CONSTRUCTED ON THE WEST END OF AREA "A" TO BRING THAT UP TO
947 FROM THE PRESENT 943. BERM WILL HAVE A 2 TO ! OR
GREATER BASE TO HEIGHT RATIO. THERE WILL BE A MINIMUM 1 FT
FREEBOARD ON THE DIKE BETWEEN AREA "A" AND "C" AND 2 FT
MINIMUM FREEBOARD ON THE PERIMETER OF AREA "A" AND "C".
RESOLUTION #88-105
EXHIBIT "A"
NA- 02622-03
Rev. 12/85
t ,~jDEPARTMENT OF .
NATURAL RESOURCI::~
' ,'' .?.i'::PERMIT APPLICATION
.TO.WORK IN PROTECTED WATERS OR WETLANDS
' "'L:?{".' 'i IINCLUDING DAM ~FETYI
'".'.," .i r':' .'..
· · Please read instructions before attempting to complete this application·
r OFFICE USE ONLY.
L P.A. NO.
,'.[I I-I I II I
· J I--ISWCD F1 C/C
· J [] w.o. []usco.
I. jApplicant's Name (Last, First, M.I.) '? . ":~' Authorized Agent (if applicable)
J'Addre_ss (Street, RFD, Box Number, City, State, Zip Code) .
JTelephone Number&areacode
II. I LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (BESURE TO INCLUDE SKETCH SHOWING HOW TO GET TO THE SITE)
IGovernment Lot(s) 10uarter Section(s) . ISection(_s) No. ~:. ITownship(s) No. IRange,(s) NoJ._ _...ILot,.BJoj;k, &ub. diy~orL
I Fire No., Box No. or Project Address "," ~? , ICounty I P'roject will affect ]J~ Lake I-IWetland-or 1'1Watercourse
J ' : ' ' ' ' (name & number
I RF-,NJ~-~ f~M Jif known)
III. TYPE OF WORK PROPOSED (CHECKONE) I¥. 'TYPE OF PROJECT (CHECK ONE) ' "
,~ excavate g repair 'i i ' []. shoreline - F1 shore-protection' n obstruction .' ' [] dam -
[] fill [] remove ' · ~'~ · ~ / ' : '
--: lii~channel - c"1 harbor -'~,..ID bridge ~ - D other
53 dram.. [] a.b. and,on ,, , D sand blanket D permanent dock ': n culvert , .::. (specify)
LJ construct [] otner ~speciTy) - - ', ~
[] install ~.', [] riprap "[] wharf ~ ::...' ,- ,
V. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ ,%0 ~"~X.:JO :~ VI. LENGTH OF SHORELINE AFFECTED (IN FEET): ~O(~
VOLUME OF MATERIAL FILLED OR EXCAVATED (IN CUBIC YARDS):
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF PROJECT: (EXPLAIN WHAT PROJECT CONSISTS OF AND HOW WORK WlI~L BE DONE)J
At..T
PURPOSE OF PROJECT: (Explain ,w, hy this project is ?eeded) ,-.',
ENVIRONMENTAL I~R~ (Anticipated changes to th~water and rela~d I~nd resources, including una~ida~e but detrimenLal effects)
ALiEfiNATIVES (Other alternatives to the action proposed) · , · ....
I hereby make application pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter. 105.42 and all suppofling rules for a permit to work in or affect the above named protected
water(s) in accordance with all supporting maps, plans, and other information submitted with this application, The information submitted and statements made
concerning this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. .. · -.
cou.. o, t'k
Subscribed and sworn to belore me this
My commission expir~ /-- 7--~Z
I slpnatu~3~ of Owner or/~uthorizeq"A'lJ~t .' -.
I Sig~ature of Leasee ,...
J~ NOTARY PUBUO - MINN~OTA {
(~ RAMSEY COUNTY J . White: DNR
~ My mmm~lon ~lr. 1-7-~ ' ' Blue: SWCO
~_~ ..................... =_. Green: Watershed District
Date
Goldenrod: City or County
Pink: Army Corps of Engineers
Canary: Applicant
b
IqlNN£1'I
MINNETRISTA
I
/~INi~ETONK A ~ItACH
SHORE~'O01~
:1
':.'5.
i
I
I
I
I
B I
I
I
I
!
3
S4~0
/~57
JUNE 21.1988
AGREEMENT TO DREDGE CHANNEL
AS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICATION FOR THE PERMIT' WE THE UNDERSIGNED
RIPARIAN (SHORELINE) LOT OWNERS AGREE BY OUR. SIGNATURE TO ALLOW
OUR CHANNEL TO BE 'DREDGED AS ALLOWED BY THE DNR AND bTHER GOVERNING
AGENCIES TO RESTORE NAVIGABILITY BY BOATS. PREglOUS DREDGING HAS BEEN
PERFORMED IN THIS CHANNEL UNDER PERMITS 61-1065'AND ~8-215.
..~~~SHERWOOD DRIVE
SHERWOOD DRIVE
GARY BREUHAN
5420 BREEZY ROAD
ROBERT O'HA~
5432 BREEZY ROAD
ROBERT LARSON
5436 BREEZY ROAD
1~ JOHN STONE '- ) MARK JASSKY
/ -'__ '~,:7:' ' · -'"
MICHAEL DOSHAN ~ MICHAEL KRAME~
55~3 SHERWOOD DRIVE 5S04 BREEZY ROAD
%
,.I
For July 12, 1988 Council Meeting
July 7, 1988
Our Lady of the Lake Church requests the following Licenses for the
Incredible Festival July 31, 1988.
Please Waive the Fee for one of them as indicated.
Public Dance Permit - Waive Fee
Charitable 3.2 Beer Permit
JULY 11, 1988
TO: MOUND MAYOR ~ND CITY
FROM: RUSS PETERSON~
COUNCIL
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FILL PERMIT, VANDERSTEEG PROPERTY
I AM ONE OF THE HOMEOWNERS ON A CHANNEL BETWEEN BREEZY ROAD AND
SHERWOOD DRIVE. FOR MANY YEARS STORM WATER RUNOFF FROM THE
SURROUNDING STREETS WASHED ERODED SOIL INTO THE CHANNEL. NOT TOO
MANY YEARS AGO A HOLDING POND AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED
THAT WOULD NORMALLY MINIMIZE FURTHER EROSION. UNFORTUNATELY, THE
SYSTEM COULD NOT HANDLE A 12 INCH RAIN AND LAST JULY THE SYSTEM
BROKE DOWN AND THERE WAS EXTENSIVE EROSION OF SOIL INTO THE
CHANNEL.
WE ARE WILLING TO INVEST IN MAINTENANCE DREDGING TO TRY TO RESTORE
THE VALUE OF OUR PROPERTY. WITH THE CURRENT DROUGHT THE CHANNEL IS
NOT NAVIGABLE, BUT THE PROBLEM IS NOT ONE THAT WILL BE SOLVED WITH
RAIN. IF WE CAN GET THE NECESSARY PERMITS TO DREDGE, ANOTHER
FAMILY WILL JOIN US AND BUILD A HOME ON A VACANT LOT ON BREEZY
ROAD.
THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A COPY OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION TO THE DNR
AND OTHER AGENCIES. SO FAR WE HAVE WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS TO FILL THE SPECIFIC LOCATION PROPOSED.
TONY VANDERSTEEG, THE OWNER OF THE SITE PROPOSED TO TAKE THE SOIL
FROM THE DREDGING IS IN HOLLAND THIS WEEK VISITING RELATIVES. HE
WROTE A STATEMENT TO GIVE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL WHICH IS
ATTACHED.
THE PROPOSED FILL SITE IS ON NATURAL LOW GROUND. IT IS CONSIDERED
A GOOD SITE IN OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH VARIOUS AGENCIES. IT IS THE
ONLY FEASIBLE SITE WE HAVE.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
BILLS---~ JULY 12, 1988
Batch 8063
Batch 8064
Total Bills
47,553.16
.115,817.~3
163,371.Og
ALTER)~TIVE .......I' ~,,-
~,rr~u, ,~ VENDOR TOTAL
01-4.?'J-!300
i010
B0580 PRE-~AiD !,642.20 GASOLINE
7/05/88 7/05/88 ~ ~ ~n ~t~,-CD
01-!250-0000
I010 1542,20
BILL CLARK OIL ~n~ ..... ~ -c,,On~ TOTAL
C0720 PRE-PAiD ~.4c. REP~N!SH PETTY ~:..
7/05/88 7/05/88 24.48 JRNL-CD
71-7100-~00
1010 24.48
PRE-PAID
/.~/~o 7/05/88
36.64 F~LEN P/C
36.64 ~NL-CD
0!-4140-~00
1010 36.64
PRE-PAID
,/u~lo8 71.~1 ....
32.1! REPLEN P/C
32.11 JRNL-CD
0t-4140-2200
1010 ~.11
CITY OF MOUND VD~DOR TOTAL
93.23
CIO01
PRE-PAiD
7/05/88 7/05/~3
PRE-PAiD
7105/88 7105188
80.02 MAY SALES TAX
6,621t72 MAY SALES TAX
6,701.74 d~NL-CD
44.00 EST JUNE SALES TAX
~ = SA~S
,7t~.~0 EST JL~E TAX
.,~.~o...~, JRNL-CD
7~-~v~2-0000
71-$592-0000
1010
73-3592-0000
71-35~-0000
1010
6701.74
3756.50
PRE-PAID 2,609.48 SIT 6/~ PR 01-2040-00¢~
~/0~/~8 7/05/88 ~ '^~ '~
~,OVI.~OJRNL-CD 1010
2609.48
COMM!SS!DER OF REVENUE V~DDR TOTAL 13067.72
~,~, PRE-PAID 64.00 R~mJND-PERMIT
!A~./~R 64.00 ~NL-CD
7,. .... ~ 7/05/~
·
CUSTOM DIMENSIONS VENDOR TOTAL 64.00
01-325!-0000
1010
64.00
D!2!?
PRE-PAiD 4!I.25 47 cm'ONTRACT HOUE~ 81-4250-3!~
18.70 MILEAGE ~1-4~0-~
7K;5/~8 7/05/88 4~,.~ d~NL-CD 1010
429,95
D~B~RT RUDGL:'H
VENDOR TOTAL 4~.9~ ~
F'RE-PA!D 80.74 MCD RESERVE LUNCH _
7/05/~8 7/05/88 80.74 JRNL-CD
01-2300-0220
1010
80.74
DOMINO'S PIZZA
VENDOR TOTAL 80.74
F'F;E-PAtD
/ / ;.J,
r~r.-rAIu
189.44 L!Q
577.54 WiNE
9.56- DISC
~ ~ JRNL-CD
71-7!00-~510
7!-7100-9520
71-7!00-¢5~,0
1010
mm
CiTY Or :,,..'~,.[,;
70.80 WINE 71-7100-¢520
17.85 MiX 71-7100-9510
9.!9- DISC ? '"" '"="
7/05/88 7/05/88 "~' ~ '~; ''~
ED PHILLIPS & EONS
VEi'~OR TOTAL
F1725
PRE-PAID 195.~) ~G.MT S.-,ILLS-H,nndl 01-4140-4110
l~ ^^ !~5.00''
7/05/88 7/05/~ ,~,vv ~f-Z-CD 10!0
,FRE!~J PRYOR SE~!f4ARI
VB4DDR TOTAL 195.00
G!¢55 PRE-PAID
7/05/88 7/05/88
GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE VB'~OR TOTAL
1,123.00 DEF COMP-6/25 PR 01-20~}-00CK~
1,123.00 JRNI.-CD 10!0 1123.00
1i23.00
81972 PRE-PAID
7/05/88 7/05/~
,,/~.~; LIQ 71-7100-9510
199,26 WINE 71-71~J-9520
43.53- DISC 71-7100-9560
15.30 FRT 71-7100-9600
2,148.15 JR)~.-CD 1010
2148.!5
PRE-PAID
7/05/88 7/05/88
~,7¢~.44 LIQ 71'7100-7510
1~S.64 WIf~ 7!-7100-9520
145.82 MIX 7i'7100-9540
61.04- DISC 71-7100-7560
~.50 FRT 71-7100-9~
3,013.36 JRNL-CD 10!0
GRiGG$ COOP~ & COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 5161.51
12301 PRE-PAID 500.37 DED 6/25 PR 01-20~)-0000
~,~o 7 OS F8 1010
7/0~/o~ /.~/~ 500.37 o~NL-CD
50,3.37
ICMJ RETIREK~T CORP VENDOR TOTAL 500.37
J2540 PRE-PAID 214.75
7/05/88 7/05/88 2!4.75
JOHN ~W~LD !!I VENDOR TOTAL 214.75
J2571 PRE-PAID 615.00
7/05/~ 7/05/88 615.00
REFUND DV~'.PYT TX & PERA-W/C
JRNL-CD
~ CO)ffRACT HOURS
JRNL-CD
0!-2040-0000
1010
01-434.0-3!00
1010
2!4.75
615.00
JC~N TA~ VENDOR TOTAL 615.00
F~E-PAID
7105/88 7/05/88
~3~.!7
3.06-
10.85-
5.00
.~4.~6
L!Q
WINE
DISC
FRT
JRNL-CD
71-7!00-7510
71-7100-9520
7!-7iCQ-9560
71-7!00-7600
1010
PRE-PAID
1,~8.24
872.94
40.38-
LIQ
DiSC
/I-¢100-r..10
7!-7100-~520
7!-7100-9560
PA~: 3
AF
iNVOICE OUE HOLD
INVOICE NI~R DATE DATE STATUS
-,r,=,o.'. 7/05/88
dOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE [I~ VENDOR TOTAL
d2550 PRE-PAID
7/05188 7/05/88
dOt41SON PAP~ CO.ANY VEND~ TOTAL
,~,250 PRE-PAID
7/05/88 7/05/88
MI~E~SCO VENDOR TOTAL
PP£-PA!D
7105/88 7105/~8
~ RE"rlREMENT SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL
M3520 PRE-PAID
7/05/88 7/05/88
MOUND POSTMASTElt VB~DOR TOTAL
N3800 PRE-PAID
7/05/88 7/05/~
NOR~ERN STATES POW~ CO VENDOR TOTAL
P3950 PRE-PAID
7/05/88 7/05/88
P E R A VE~DOR TOTAL
Q4171 ~E-PAID
7105/88 7/05/88
PP£-PAID
7105/88 ' s ~'
QUALITY WIB~ & SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL
~4~. PRE-PAiD
7105/88 7105/88
RO~T E dCHNSON VE~uu~ TOTAL
41.50
2,452.30
2976.56
105.33
t05.33
105.33
!8.66
6.72
45.25
45.25
288.00
288.00
~8.00
70.07
70.07
140.14
140.14
11.90
11.90
I1.90
5,Y31.38
5,~1.38
52.'9.1
!,1!8.55
101.~
30.50
~.71-
1,~7.09
2,251.39
673.20
51.76-
2,872.83
4099.92
444. O0
195,66
639.66
6,~9.o6
~T
JRNL-CD
BA~S
JRNL-CD
MAY GAS
MAY OAS
MAY GAS
JR~-CD
DEF COMP-6/25 PR
~NL-CD
~I]STG-~R BILLS
POSTG-WTR BILLS
JPJ~L-CD
MAY ~EC
~NL-CD
PERA 6/25 PR
J~NL-CD
LIQ
WI~E
MIX
DISC
L!Q
WINE
DISC
JRNL-CD
48 CONTRACT HOL~S
MAY-idlE HOSP
jRNL-CD
~U~BER
7!-7!00-9600
1010
71-71nO-~r 0
1010
01-4340-3720
22-4!70-3720
71-7!00-3720
I010
0!-2040-0000
1010
73-7300-3210
78-7800-3210
1010
01-4340-3710
I010
01-2040-0000
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-95~
71-7100-9540
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
Ol-~40-.:,t'>O
01-4340-1510
I010
AHSUNI'
2452.30
45.25
~'8.00
!1.90
52~1.38
1227.09
2872.83
54.5,00 P~E-?AiD ?,278,76 FIT &/25 F~
? / ..... .:, '7/r:~!.c:,~ o,w...'-:.;;.,~
/ ! (.;.~/ow ,, ~,.. ..... .,.- ,.
STATE BA?(K OF MOL;,"'.~ 'v'ENOOR TOTAL 927~',,'76
T5020 PRE-PAID 12.00 WASTE FORUM,-NELSON
7/05/88 7/~/88 I2.00 JRNL-CD
T~IN WEST CHAMBER OF COMM~ VE?~DOR TOTAL 12.00
~.,,., PRE-PAID 105. O0
........... · +~/~,,., 108.00
BEST ROOFING ~ VENDOR TOTAL 108.00
~OTAL All VD-El. ORS 47,~3.16
R~UI,E,-OVERPYMT P~',MIT 7967
u~:NL-CD
01-4270-4110
1010 I2.00
1010 108.00
PAGE 1
AP-CIO-O1
AOIO0 AIR COIqM INC
M175 ALEXANDRIA TEC~ICAL *
A0400 ASOCIATEI) ~T
BOO(X) BABLER AUTOIOTIVE
B0550 BEN FRA~IN 9TOR~
BO711 BROWNING-FERRIS
B0730 ~Y~ RO0( PRODUCTS
B0740 ~ LIGHI'I~ INC
B0746 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL AP*
C0920CITY OF MOUND
C0940 CLEAN STEP RENT~
C0970 COCA COLA ~TTLING-MI*
C0990 CDlt~OSERVICE INC
CLIO0 COPY DLIPLICATING PROD*
1618 07/12/88
1619 07/12/88
1620 07/12/88
1621 07/12/88
1622 07/12/88
1623 07/12/88
1624 07/12/88
1625 07/12/88
1626 07/12/88
1627 07/12/88
1628 07/12/88
1629 07/12/88
1630 07/12Z88
1~I 07/12/88
1632 07/12/8~
1633 07/12/~
1634
ACCDUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
CITY DF HDUNO
INVOICE INVDICE
INVOICE ~ DATE AMOUNT
07/07/88 334.82
VENIDR TOTAL 334.82
07/07/88 94.00
VENDOR TDT~ 94.00
07/O7/88 100.00
twIENI)OR TOTAL 100.00
07/07/~ 210.75
VENDOR TOTAL 210,75
07/O7/88 222.00
VI~TOTAL 222.00
VENDO~ TOTAL 10~5.04
07/07/88 432.40
UENDOR TDT~ 432.40
07/O7/88 326.68
~ TOTAL 326.&~
VENDOR TOTAL 269.54
07/07/88 41.17
VIg~OR TOTAL 41,17
07/07/8~ 112.75
UENDOR TDTAL 112.7'5
VENDOR TOTAL 2~.00
VENDOR TOTAL 24.65
O7/O7/88 4O.48
VENDOR TOTAL 40.48
VENDOR TOTAL 4007.75
07/07/88 18.80
VENI)O~ TOTAL 18.80
DISC~IT
AMOUNT
CHECK,
AMDUNT
334.82
334.82
94.00
94.00
100.00
100.00
210.75
210.75
1085.04
10q)5.04
432.40
432.40
326.68
326.68
2~9.54
269.54
41.17
41.17
112.75
112.75
240.00
240.00
24.65
4007.75
4007.75
18.80
18.80
PRO,SS
PAY
TYPE INVOICE DEE
//lC;'
P~. 2 G~:]g"DUNTS PI~YABI. E I:HE~ EGIST8 ~OCE~
~-C10-01 CITY JIF ~ C1.ED
~ CI-E~ I:]'IE~ INVI]I~ I~OI~ DI~ I:]-IE~ PAY
NO ~ ~ ~ DATE ItlVOI~ NMI~R DA~ ~ ~ ~ TYPE I~OICE D~
Cl130 CUSTOM FIRE ~PARATIJS 1&_~5 07/12/88 07/07/{~ ~.~ ~.~
~ TOT~ ~.~ ~.~
Dl170 ~A ~IL I~ 1~ 07/12/88 07/07/~ 613.~ 613.~
~ TOT~ ~13.~ ~I3.~
Ol~ ~Y DIS~I~I~ ~ 1~7 07/12~ 07/07~ 5~.96 5~.96
~ TOT~ 5~.96 5~.96
01240 ~ ~I~g 1~ 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 47.~ 47.~
~ TOT~ 47.~ 47.~
D1310 DIXIE ~-~ I~ I~ 07/12/~ 07/07/~ ~.~ ~,~
Ol~O ~ ~Y~ 1~ 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 417.~ 417.~
~ TOT~ 417,~ 417.~
E14~ ~ SI~ ~ 1~1 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 7~7.~ 7~7.~
~ T~ 7~. ~ 7~7. ~
E14~ ~ ~ 1~2 07/12~ 07/07~ ~.~ ~.~
E1~1 ~Y* ~I~ ~* I~3 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 61.~ &l.~
~ TOT~ 61.~ 61.~
FI~I FI~ ~I~ 1~ 07/12~ 07/07/~ 24.~ 24.~
~ T~ 24.~
FI&~ F~ ~ ~ ~ 1~5 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 4~.61 4~.61
~ T~T~ 4~.61 4~.~1
F1710 ~ ~ 1~ 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 15.~ 15.~
~ TOT~ 15.~ 15.~
gl~ g F 0 A I~7 07/12~ 07/07/~ ~.~ ~.~
~1761 ~ ~T~S I~ 1~ 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 4~.~ 4~.~
~1870 ~ ~ 1~9 07/12/~ 07/07/~ ~,~ ~.~
~ TOT~ ~.~ ~.~
~1~0 ~D I~ I~ 07/12/~ 07/07/~ ~.~ ~.~
~ TOT~ ~.~ ~.~
B1970 ~B ~I~ 1~1 07/12/~ 07/07/~ 5.~ 5.~
PAGE 3
~2~0 J B DISTRIBUTING
~JIM~SALES~
L2750LOGI$
H2980 MAQ~JEE~ E~IPME~T IN*
M3030 M~ VII DISTRIBL~
~150 I'ETRO FI]NE COMHUNICAT*
M32(X) MID-CE~TRAL I~
ff"~90 ~ FIRE I)EPAR~
M3500 MOt~lO FIRE RELIEF
N3~40 ~ $IGI~
P3981 PARAMOL~iT []'EMICAL CO*
1652 07/12/88
1653 07/12/88
16~4 07/12/88
1655 07/12/88
1&56 07/12/88
1657 07/12/88
1658 07/12/88
1659
1660 07/12/88
1661 07/12/88
1~2 07/12/88
1663 07/12/~
·
1~4 07/12/88
166~ 07/12/88
1667 07/12/88
ACC[X.NTS PAYPJ)t. IE CHE~ ~GISTF. R
CITY OF MDUNI)
I~OICE INVOICE
INVOICE ~ DATE AMOL~IT
TOTAL 5.25
VENDOR TOTAL l(X)9.00
07/07/88 76,68
VENI~R TDT~ 76.68
07/07188 72.&7
VE]~ TOTAL 72.67
07/07/88 4.76
VETE)OR TOTAL 4.76
07/07188 313~.48
VB~IDOR TOTE 31~.4~
VENDOR TOTAL 4&.03
07107/88 131~.25
VB~0R TOTAL 13158.3~
TOTAL 1~0.00
07/07Z88 42.80
TOTAL 42.80
07107/88 25263.01
~ TOTAL 25263.01
TOTAL 5&3.00
VENDOR TOTAL 75.88
07/O7/88 44m.~2
07/07/88 132.00
TOTAL I~2.00
O7/O7/88 197.0&
VE]~)OR TOTAL 197.0&
DISCOUNT
1009.00
1009.00
76,68
76.68
72.&7
72.67
4.76
4,76
313~.48
312&48
46.03
4~.03
131~.35
13158.3~
19~0.00
19~0.00
42.80
42.~0
25263.01
25268.01
62'32.75
6232.75
132.00
132.00
197.06
17%06
PROOESS
CI.E~ ~
PAY
TYPE IN~I~ I)IES
PAGE, 4
AP-CIO-OI
PEPSI COLA/71.1P I)OI'TLI*
P4.002 I~ [ECISIONS
P4060 PDGREBA DISTRIBUTING
R4270RONAI. B BI]STROll
R4290 RON'S ICE COMPANY
R4310 ROYAL CROWN BEVEI~qGE
S4370SHP, RE
S4490 ST~ SPRING
~0 9U~R~W'ERI~
T4730 THE ~
T4770 THDRPE DISTRIBJTII~ C*
T47~ 'FHRI~Y ~YDER DRUG
16~ 07/12/~
1669 07/12/88
1670 07/12/88
1671 07/12/88
1672 07/12/88
1673 07/12/88
1674 07/12/88
1675 07/12/88
1676 07/12/88
1677 07/12/~
1678 07/12/88
1679 07/12/88
1680 07/]~2/88
1~81 07/12/88
1682 07/12/88
1683 07/12/88
1~84 07112188
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE O'ECK REOISTER
CITY OF ltDUND
INVOICE INVDICE
INVOICE I~IBR OATE AMDUNT
07/07/8~ 399.95
VENIX~ TOTAL 3~.95
07/07/88 1054.00
VENDOR TOTAL 1054.00
VENDOR TOT~ 4606.65
07/O7/88 410~.88
VB~]R TOT~ 4105.83
07/07/88 4.76
VENDOR TOTAL 4.76
O7/O7/88 150.00
VENDOR TOTAL 150.00
VENIXIR TOTAL 826.89
07/07/88 151.20
VENDOR TOTAL 151.20
VENDOR TOTAL 2E~.35
TOTAL 204.47
O7/07/88 159.00
VBqDOR TOTAL 159.00
07/07/88 87.12
VENIX]R TOTAL 87.12
VENDOR TOTAL 172.75
07/07/83 714.32
~ENI)OR TOTAL 714.32
07/07/88 351.31
VENDOR TOTAL 351.31
07/07/88 122~.27
TOTAL 122~.27
O7/07/88 76.74
VE]qDORTOT~ 76.74
DISCOUNT
1054.00
1054.00
4105.83
4,76
4.76
150.00
150.00
826.89
826.89
151.20
151.20
159.00
159.00
87.12
87.12
172:75
172.75
714.32
714.32
351.31
351.3I
12288.27
12288.27
76.74
76.74
PAY
TYPE INVOICE
PGE 5
AP-CIO-O1
VENDOR
T4840 TOM ROOO~AM
T4860 TOH'S ~ SERVICE
T4940 TRI-STATE PU~ & CONT*
T4980 TWIN CITY HOME ,.[IICE*
U5040 IJ~CO INC
~190 VA, NIX)REN-HAZA, RD-~ALL.
W5430 k~TER PRO1XICT$
k~:~451 WAYZATA L.AiJ~ i'IOMER
WS6,,qO WIDffiER I~
X5'/50 XEROX CSR~]P, ATI~
Z5850 ZACK'S I~C
Z6128 TERRY HAWLEY
1685 07/12/88
1686 07/12/88
1687 07/12/88
168~ 07/12/~
16~ 07/12/88
16~ 07/12/8~
1691 07/12/88
1692 07/12/88
169~ 07/12/88
1694 07/12/88
16~ 07/12/~
1696 07/12/88
' 1697 07/1-2/88 ·
1698 07/12/88
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
CITY ~ MOUND
INVOICE INVOICE
INVOICE ~ DATE AMOUNT
VENDOR TOTAL 992.00
07/07/~ 21.45
VENDOR TOTAL 21.45
07/O7/88 61.44
UENOOR TOTAL 61.44
O7/07/88 64.01
VEN]X}R TOTAL ~.01
..
07/07/88 1740.00
VENDOR TOTAL 1740.00
071O7/88 645.5O
TOTAL 645.50
VENDOR TOTAL 10(~.43
VENOOR TOTAL 9.75
07/07/88 1151.00
TOTAL 1151.00
07/O7/88 1550.00
~ TOTAL 1550.00
O7/O7/88 584.58
VENI]~ TOTAL ,~.,~
07/07/88 - -325,45
VENIN]R TOTAL 325.45
DISCOUNT
PJ~OIJ~
O-ECK PAY
~ TY~ INVOICE
21.45
21.45
61.44
61
~.01
64.01
17~0.00
1740.00
M5.50
645.50
1(X)~.43
100~.43
9.i5
9.75
I151.00
1151.00
15~0.00
1~0.00
37.00
37.00
TOTAL 115817.9'3
115817.9'3
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Len Harrell
Monthly Report for June, I988
STATISTICS
The police department responded to 708 calls For service
during the month of June. There were 50 Part I offenses
reported. Those offenses included 5 burglaries, 33 lar-
cenies, ! arson, 2 criminal s~xual conduct, ! robbery, 4 as-
saults, and 4 vehicle thefts.
There were 75 Part ii offenses reported. Those offenses in-
cluded 4 child abuse/neglect, 2 Forgery/NSF check, !5
criminal damage to property, 10 DWi's, 3 simple assaults, ?
domestics (2 with assault), 12 harassment, 2
runaway/truancy, ! weapons charge, 5 narcotics violations,
9 liquor violations, and 10 miscellaneous other offenses.
The patrol division issued 226 adult citations and 24
juven'ile citations. Parking violations accounted For an ad-
ditional 52 citations· An additional 205 warnings were
issued during the month.
Two adults and Four juveniles were arrested For Felonies in
June. Twenty-Five adults and Four juveniles were arrested
For misdemeanors
The department assisted -in 9 vehiclular accidents. There
were 25 medical emergencies and i24 animal complaints. OF-
Ficers assisted surrounding agencies on mutual aid calls 15
times in June.
Property valued at $26,]73 was stolen during the month and
$t8,125 of that was recovered.
il. INVESTIGATION
Sgt. Hudson and inv. Grand worked on a total of lO child
protection matters during the month of June. These cases
accounted for 34 hours of investigative time. The depart-
ment has investigated 39 child protection cases since the
First of the year.
MOUND POLICE REPORT
MONTHLY REPORT FOR JUNE, 1988
Two Felony assaults were investigated For a total of 48.5
hours of investigation time. One assault involved the in-
jury of OFFicer John Ewald. Fourteen hours were spent on
narcotics violations. Other cases investigated included ar-
son, thefts, 2 criminal sexual conducts, checks, un-
authorized use of a motor vehicle, a bomb threat, and
burglary.
Inv. Grand made several presentations and introduced our new
"91! squad" tt~at was donated by the Northwest Tonka Lions.
Formal complaints were issued in 3 cases. Those cases were
DWI and resisting arrest, aggravated DWI and false informa-
tion to police, and 4th degree assault. The assault com-
plaint was signed against Robert Bruno Burak, dob: 03-07-5!,
For' assaulting Officer John Ewald. Bail was set at $3,000.
III. MANPOWER
The department used 107 hours of overtime during the month
of June. Almost 50 hours of that overtime went to assist in
the Mound City Days celebration. The bulk of the rest of
the overtime went to cover shift fill-ins while Officer
Ewald was out injured. Officer Ewald is due to come back to
work July 9, !988.
Officers earned about 35 hours in comp-time in June and used
over 20 hours. Officers also used 138.5 hours of vacation
and 37.5 hours of holiday time.
!V- TRAINING ·
Five officers attended a one day "shooting decisions" course
in June. There was a 4 hour training on sexual harassment
attended by myself and there were three other days of train-
ing in management and leadership Practices. Each officer
attended in-service firearms training this month.
V.._~.. RESERVES
The police reserves donated 197 hours to the department and
the community in June. One hundred of those hours were
spent assisting at Mound City Days events.
The reserves also assisted during the gas explosion in
diverting traffic From the area. Other events included
Westonka's ali night party, transports to jail, and ride-
alongs.
2
~AI~P I C2IM~ o~ ~ ~ oom ADULT. JUV
Sexual Conduct 2
Robbery 1
~ssault 4 1 2 2
BurElary 5 1 2
~rceny 33 - 2 1 1 ,
Vehicle Theft 4
.Arson 1 1' 1
TOTAL 5O
PART II ~
Child Abuse/Neglect 4
ForEery/NSF Checks 2
Criminal DamaEe to Property 15 3 2 1,
Weapons 1 ,
Narcotic Laws
LDLaw s 9 9 9 1
· .. -10. 1' 8. 9. ..
SimPle Assault 3 1 1 1
Domestic Assault 2 1 -1 1
Domestics (No Assault} 5
Harassment 12 2
Runaway~Incorrigibility~Truancy 2 1 2
Public Peace 3 1 1
Ail Other Offenses 7 2 2
TOTAL 75 8 25 25 4
PART III &';PART IV
Property DamaEe Accidents 9
'Personal Injury Accidents 0
Fatal Accidents 0
Medical~ 25
Animal Complaints 124
Other General Investigations 535
TOTAL. " 708
Henn Cry. Child Protection 3
TOTAL ACTIVITIES
]' 836
[ 12
29
27 ~ 8
If., '7-'1
MONTH
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
POLICE/CRIME ACTIVrrY REPORT
JUNE YEAR 1988
THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
MONTH T0 DATE TO DATE
Hazardous Citations 143 642 --.726
Non-Hazardous Citations 66 324 328
Hazardous Warnings 29 196 233
Non-Hazardous Warnings 48 435 496
Verbal Warnings 127 657 422
Parkin~ Citations ~2 323 209
DWI 10 ~9 55
OVER .10 3 24 &0
Property Damage Accidents 9 61 49
Personal In.jury Accidents 0 13 22
Fatal. Accidents~ 0 0 '0
'Adult Felony Arrests 7 " 19 - 28.
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 28 120 153
Adult Misdemeanor Citations 18 55 ~4
~uvenile Felony Arrests 4 &~ 35
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 4 34 74
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 7 25 3~
Part I Offenses 50 173 169
Part II Offenses 75 391 414
Medicals 25 112 95
Animal.Complaints 124 564 572
Other Public Contacts 535 2,831 2,608
TOTAL 1,364 7,092 6,806
Assists 83 357 246
FOllow-Ups 31 237 265
HCCP 3 32 -
MOUND POLICE DEPARTM£NT MONTHLY REPORT
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .I0% BAC
Reckless Driving
Driving AFter Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speed
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to YieiO
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or UnsaFe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog OrOinance
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
ADULT
lO
3.
!
1
tO0
Z
3
Z7
!
9
I
0
0
1
5Z
9
0
0
Z
278
JUV
0
0
0
0
0
9
]
0
2
0
3
0
0
]
0
0
0
l
0
0
5
0
Z4
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
WARNINGS
No [~surance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Other
TOTAL
ADULT
47
.82
0
3
4
JUV
4
1]
'7
0
0
0
0
22
ARRESTS
Misc. Arrests
Warrant Arrests
5
PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SU~RY
Bikes
Snowmobiles
I TEH
Boats, l~otors, Trailers
Clothing
Currency,
JewelFy &
Guns
Notes, Etc.
Precious Metals
Home Furnishings
Radio & Electronic Equipment
ST~)LEN
$ 1,235
~5,210
10
648
3,068
RECOVERED
$ 742
15,210
Vehicles g Vehlcle Equipment
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
2,000
4,002
$26,173
2,000
173
$18,125
MOUND POLICE RESERVE5
MONTHLY HOUR5
JUNE 1988
OFFICER
R5 R6 RII
DETAILS
Emer,C/O 4,5
Res, 5q,
Comm. S. 15 9.5
Training 4
Instruction
Ride Al,
Admin, ZO 15
RI2
12.5
RI3
RI4
RI6
10,5 I4,5
24
RI9
4.5
21.5
R23
11
6 8,'5
TOTAL
9
4
lOl ,5
4.
41;5
35
TOTALS 39 29 15,5
10,5 40,5
32 21.5 197
ACT I V l T I ES TH I S MONTH
I Transport
Graduation Party
Events at Mound City Days lOOh°urs
Call Out For Gas Line Explosion
OFFICERS
R5 Thompson
R6 Hawks
Rll Romain
RI2 Smith
R13 Meuwissen
RI4 Svoboda
RI6 Niccum
RI9 Nelson
R23 Vogel
Prepared Dy
Debbie Thompson, Sgt.
OFFICER
Butch Hawks
Debbie Thompson
Ruth Vogel
Dan Niccum
Steve Smith
Sherry 5voboda
Dave Nelson
Rob Heuwissen
John Roma in in
TOTALS
Training
HOUND POLICE RESERVES
5EVERENCE ACCOUNTS
JUNE 1988
DEPOSIT
$6.50
$6.50
$6.50
$19.50
BALANCE
$271.50
$375.50
$382.00
$186.50
$97.50
$71.50
$52.00
$78.00
$1614.50
Prepared by
Debbie Thompson, Sgt.
RUN: 6-JUL-88
CFS03
PRIMARY ]SN'S ONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
E ~ F 0 R S
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05/26/88 THRU 06/25/88
PAGE.
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCR!PTIO.~
........... PATROL AREAS
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL
0~000 SPEEDING
0~001 J-SPEEDiNG
<7B002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09002 d-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09004 RESTRICTED D/L
09008 ILLEGAL PASSING
0~0!0 BAC OVER .10
0~012 OPEN BOTTLE
0~0!4 STOP SIGN
09015 J-STOP SIGN
09016 FAILURE TO YIELD
09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
09017 d-EQIPMENT VIOLATION
09020 CARELESS/RECKLESS
0~022 EXMISITI~4 DRIVING
09026 OVER THE CENTER LINE
~IB020 CROSSW~:LK VIOLATION
09031 J-CROSSWALK VIOLATION
09040 ;tO SEATBELT
0~041 d-NO SEATBELT
09100 PARKING/ALL OTHER
0~50 ~ TRAILER PARKING
0'~200 DAS/DAR/DAC
21 13 13 22
1 2 3 2
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
4 4
1 2
I 5 1 1
2
2
1
1 4
1
4 6
1
1 5
31
1
13
3
3
1
3
100
2
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
8
2
1
2
1
1
34
5
25
27
8
RUN: 6-¢UL-8S
6FS03
PR~ ISN"S ONLY?
~"T, IVIIY CODES:
ALL
ACi
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
092i0
L¥'2il
09220
09300
~;301
09302
(r)3!2
09."450
09451
09561
09562
0056'3
09564
09565
09730
0~73!
09732
09800
PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
d-PLATES/NO-EXPIRED-IMPROPER
NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
d-NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
LOST ARTICLES/OTHER
LOST PERSONS
LOST ANIMALS
FOUND ANIMALS/iMPOUNDS
PROPERTY
PROF'ERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC,
DOG BITE
CAT BITES
DOG AT LARGE
DOG BARKING
DOG LICENSE
MEDICALS
DETO×-MEDiCALS
~,~,~r~c~ INT,-MEDtCALS
ALL OTMER/UNCLASSIFIED
DOmESTIC/N9 ASSAU;_T
09802 POBLiC ASSISi
09900 ALL MCCP CASES
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL An.u.A
05/26/88 THRU 06/25/88
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
13
1
1 5 5
1
2 1 1
1
i
PAGE 2
TOTAL
27
2
6
1
1
3
1
15
12
8
1
1
2
6
1
2
t9
3
3
5
5
1
3
RtIN: b-JUL-S8
PRIMARY ISN"S ONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
,NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05i26/88 THRU 06/25/88
PAGE . 3
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL
(8710 MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS
09930 HANDG~ APPLICATION
~945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON
09980 WARRANTS
~990 MISC. VIOLATIONS
09992 MUTUAL AID/8100
1~993 MUTUAL AID/6500
09?94 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER
A1142 ASLT 1-GREAl BODILY HARM-OTHR-~EAPON-ADLT-ACQ
A3252 ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-HANDS ETC-ADLT-ACQ
A4057 ASLT 4-ACT NOT APPLICABLE-HAND ETC-POLICE
A5055 ASLT 5-UNKNOWN ACT-HANDS ETC-CHLD-ACQ
A5551 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
A5354 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-~NDS-CHLD-F~M
A5355 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANBS-CHLD-ACQ
B1260 BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN WEAP-UNK ACT
B3364 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B3434 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B3494 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
F7005 NEGLIGENT FIRE-MS-OT PROP-S299 LESS
I30~,0 CRIM AGNST FAM-M~-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
d2700 TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
~:500 .RA, ~,~ M~-D~,,E Ur~DER INFLUENCE OF LIQU~
2
2 2 1 1
1 9 4 6 4
3 1
! 1
1 1
1
2 2
2 1
1 1
1
3
6
24
4
7
4
4
1
1
2
1
2
3
2
!
!
1
2
1
1
5
5
R~:
CF~O~
ACT
~DE
~7t~l
L7022
M3001
M4104
M4105
M5313
5350
N3070
N3190
~602
03772
P3110
P3120
P-.,loO
P3310
P3600
R2943
T0021
T2159
T216'~
IBNZB ONLY? NO
CODES: ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFOR~o
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05126/88 THRU 06125188
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AR~S ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ~0
CSC 4-UNK ACT-PARENT-L~4[ER 13-F
CSC 4-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-M
JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER
LIQUOR - POSSESSING
LIOUOR - MISREPRESENTING AGE-~INOR
LIQUOR - OTHER
JUVENILE-CURFEW
RUNAWAY
PEACE-MS-DISORDERL~ CONDUCT
DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
DISTURB PEACE-MS-HArASSING CO~UNICATIONS
OBSENIT¥-MS-INDECENT-E×P~URE-TO ADULT
OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE LETTER ETC-ADULT
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTE~IT
PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
LITTER-UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS
ROBB-AGG-NO BH-OTM TYP-OTH WEAF'-ADULT-STR
THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM BUiLDING-MONEY
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-$251-s2500-FE-FRM MJTOR VEHiCLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
2 2
2 2
1
1
4 7
1
!
1 1
1
1
!
2
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
2
1
1
5
1
2'
1
2
11
2
1
13
1
1
2
1
1
1
I
3
RUN: ~,-dUL-88
CFS03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
~0
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05126188 THRU 06/25/88
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
T4011
T402i
T4029
T4059
T4157
T4169
U1494
U1503
~U1504
U30i6
5026
U3286
U3496
THEFT-250 LESS-MS-FRM PERSON-MONEY
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY
THE~-$250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
TMEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTM PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FP~q WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-301-500
T~EFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-501-2500
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-301-500
THEFT-MS-BY CHECK-S250 LESS
THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLES CHECK-S250 LESS
THEFT-MS-SHOF~IFTING-$2~ LESS
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 LESS
V1029 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-BOAT-SLF PROPEL MT~IZ
V2022
V2029
~950
X3080
VEM THEFT-FE-~251-$2500-TRUCK-BUS
VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-BOAT-MOTORIZED
WEAPONS-~-OTHER ACT-E×PLOS-NO CHAR
CRIM AGNST AOM~ dUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS
2
2 1
3
1 2
1 1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
2
1
!
PAGE . 5
TOTAL
1
4
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
5
2
1
REPORT TOTALS: 116 60 144 112 110 2 4 7 2
557
OFFOi
INSTALLATIO~ NAME -- MOUND POLICE
PAGE
I§W§ ONLY? NO E N F 0 R §
CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 05/26/88 THRU 06/25/88
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. !
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ~EST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPO~TED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
· A1142 1
ASLT 1-GREAT BODILY HARM-OTHR-WEAPON-ADLT-ACQ
~'.-:252 1
ASLT 3-SUBST~TIAL INdURY-HANDS ETC-ADLT-~Q
A4057 2
ASLT 4-ACT NOT APPLICABLE-HAND ETC-POLICE
A5(~.,5 1
ASLT 5-UNKNOWN ACT-HANDS ETC-CHLD-ACQ
2
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
3
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-~LD-FAM
A5355 2
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-MANDS-CHLD-ACQ
B1260 1
BURG i-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN WE~-UNK ACT
~364 1
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-U~ ~EAP-CJ}M THEFT
~434 1
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
2
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
~005 1
NEGLIGENT FIRE-MS-OT PROP-S29? LESS
13060 1
CRIm AG,NST FAM-~S-NEGLECT OF A CdlLD
TR~CiD-GM-AGSRAVATED VIOLATION
~'.500 5
TF(AF-ACCtD-~S-DF,:IVE L, NF~FF; ~'~'~,~ ,..,.,.,,~.*';"'~; OF' i. IQUOR
0 1 0 1 0 ~ 1 100.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 2 1 I 0 0 1 50.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 2 0 1 0 1 '2 100.0
0 3 2 1 0 0 1 33.3
0 2 1 1 0 0 1 50.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 2. 2 0 0 0 0 ,0
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 5 0 4 0 1 5 100.0
1 4 0 4 0 0
4 100.0
BJ~: 6-,..~L-88
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE. 2
PRIMARY IS~'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISF~SITION
GRID: AL~ 05/26/88 T~RU 06/25/88
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED U~FQUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT dUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
L7021 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC 4-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-F
L7022 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC A-UN( ACT-PARENT-UNDER I3-M
M300i 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 100.0
JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFF~D~
M4104 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
LIQUOR - POSSESSING
M4105
LIQUOR - MI~EPRESENTING AGE-MINOR
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
M419~ 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4
LIQUOR - OTHER
100.
M5313 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
JUVENILE-CURFEW
5350 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 I 50.0
RUNAWAY
~3030
DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
5070 2 0 2
DISTU~ PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
11
DISTURB PEACE-MS-MARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
0 1 0 1 2 100.0
~602 2
OBS~ITY-MS-INDECENT-EXF'OSURE-TO ADULT
6~772
OBSENiTY-MS-OBSCE~E LETTER ETC-ADULT
1 10 8 0 0 2 2 20.0
P3! 10 13
PROP DAMAGE-MS-F'RIVATE-U,N~:i INTENT
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 13 12 0 1 0 1 7 '
I 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
FE; 120
F'ROP DAMAGE-MS-F'U~,LIC-UNK INT~T
RUN: 6-dUL-8$ INSTALLATION NAnE -- MOUND POLICE DEP~TMENl PAGE 3
OFF01
tSN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
iITION CODES: ALL
~TiViT¥ CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 05/26/88 THRU 06/25/88
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. !
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARRE$? .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTIO~ REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDIk~ ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
.P3130
PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
1 0 1 I 0 0 (~ 0 .0
P3310 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 50.0
TRESPASS-MS-F~IVATE-U~( INTENT
F'3600
LITTER-UNLAWFUL DE,rd]SIT OF GARBAGE-MS
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100,0
~943 1
ROBB-AGG-NO BH-OTH TYP-OTH WEAP-ADULT-STR
10021
THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FP.M BUILDING-MONEY
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,0
)O-FE-FRM BUILDING-DTH PROP
12t59 1
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-F~q MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
T216~ 3
THEFl-$251-$2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
T401i 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-250 LESS-MS-FRM PEESON-MONEY
14021
THEFT-S250 LE~-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY
4 0 4 3 0 0 1 1 ~.0
3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 ,0
T402~
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-F,.~M BUILDING-DTH PROP
3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-DTH PROP
14157 3
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-DTH PROP
0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
LESS-MS-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
U14~4 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-301-500
RUN: 6-JUL-88 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 4
~I~RY 1SN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 05/26/88 TMRU 06/25/88
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT dUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
U1503 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-501-2500
U1504 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-FE-BOAT-ND MOTOR-301-500
U3016 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-MS-BY CHECK-S250 LESS
U3026
THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLES CHECK-S250 LESS
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
L~:286 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 100.0
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-S250 LESS
~4~6 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-ND MOTOR-250 LESS
V1027 2
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-BOAT-SLF PROPEL MTRIZ
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 ,0
~2022 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500-TRUCK-BUS
V2029
VEH TMEFT-FE-251-2500-BDAT-MOTORIZED
WEAPONS-MS-OTHER ACT-EXPLDS-NO CHAR
X3080 1
CRIM AG~IST ADMN dUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
·
1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
REPORT TOTALS - 119
3 116 75 24 5 12 41
July 8, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
JUNE MONTHLY REPORT
There were 2 regular Council Meetings in June. Packet prepara-
tion was done for each of these meetings. Minutes were prepared
for the June 14th meeting. Five resolutions and an ordinance
were prepared and the ordinance was published. There were a lot
of clean-up items from the two meetings and things that had to be
sent to various persons. The minutes from the meeting on June 28
will be prepared in July. Time got short and other priorities
came up.
June seemed to be a hectic month for me. Mound City Days took up
part of the first two weeks getting the parade in shape and all
the last minute details. I think we're making progress in
developing some civic pride in our community.
I spent two days in June transcribing tapes for pending litiga-
tion.
We have received our new election equipment. Linda and I spent
almost one entire day at BRC, the distributor for the equipment,
conducting the acceptance tests on each machine. We also spent
another day with the manufacturer getting technical training on
the machines. This was very interesting because they had the
machines in various states of trouble and we had to figure out
what was wrong with them and how to correct the problems. Linda
and I both felt this will be beneficial at election time.
The Secretary of State's Office held their general election year
training session for municipalities.
The department heads all attended a sexual harassment seminar
with was interesting and educational.
I spent several days doing research for you on old minutes and
resolutions looking for things on sewer hook-ups and private lift
stations.
There were the usual calls from residents and questions from the
general public on property and other various issues.
I inputted the budget pages for all departments into the computer
with all the figures from previous years. This required starting
over from scratch with the new computer system, but it went very
well. The new Lotus program is wonderful.
fc
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 7, 1988
TO:
FROM:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
AND CITY COUNCIL
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR
RE:
JUNE FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
CBD UPDATE
Ve held followup meetings on the future of the CBD program. The City has taken
on some additlonal costs from the downtown business district. We presented the
plan to the businessmen, they reacted favorably. The outcome of our meetings
is that the CBD program will continue into future years.
The City is looking at extending Christmas decorations on County Road 15 up to
Hardees. All of the decorations purchased in the past have been paid for by the
CBD district. In our CBD meeting, it was discussed whether the businesses along
County'Road 15 (not in CBD district) could pay for their share of the Christmas
decorations. We are writing the businesses along County Road 15 asking if they
would contribute to the purchase of these decorations. The City provides the
work of installing, taking down and storing the decorations.
INVESTMENTS
The following is June investment activity:
Balance 6-1-88
Bought:
CD 7
CP 7.66
CP 7.60
CD 7.80
Ha tu red:
CD 7.94
CD 7.88
FNMA 7.60
$7,001,779
Due 10-28-88 State Bank of Mound 150,000
Due 12-1q-88 Harquette 288,938
Due 9-23-88 Dain Bosworth 200,000
Due 12-29-88 Dain Bosworth 288,29q
Piper Jaffray
Daln Bosworth
Harquette
(288,078)
(200,000)
(68,739)
$7,372,194
Ve received the first portion of the tax settlement June 21 ($550,000).
The cash balance in the general fund fell from $876,511 on January 1 to
$36,000 on June 20. This demonstrated the need to maintain our year end
cash reserves.
An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicappecl~statu$
in the admission or access to. or treatment or employment in, its programs and activmes.
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 1, 1988
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
June's Activity Report
We finished patching the streets that are scheduled for sealcoating by the
15th. We did alot of sweeping this month because of the striping, the
parking lots and crosswalks, Precision Striping did the painting. This
work was completed by the 8th and 17th. We also swept the 8 miles of
streets to be sealed.
The old sweeper is giving us alot of trouble, it seems like we work it
for 8 hours and repair it for 16 hours.
We had alot of small jobs to take care of this month, such as hauling dirt
for a vollyball court, then after the games, clean up the mess. Taking
down banners and puting up different ones, flags up and down on Commerce,
cutting brush, posting ro~ds for sealcoating, handing out flyers, piling
buckshot, cleaning up the cemetery dump area, servicing equipment and etc.
SIGN WORK
2 Stop signs
2 No Parking
1 Slow Children
1 Hidden Driveway
CEMETERY
2 graves and 4 stones.
STREET MATERIAL PURCHASED
6.75 tons of 1~ red rock
104 tons blacktop
An equal opportuni',y Employer that does no*, discriminate on the basis of race, color nabona! origin, or handicapped status
in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment ~n, its programs and act~;,~t,es
CITY MOL ND
534t MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
1612) 472-1155
July 8, 1988
TO:
FRON:
RE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTOR
JUNE PARK DEPARTMENT REPORT
GENERAL COMMENT
The drought has affected all areas of my department. The parks
are so dry that the heavier-use areas are being worn to dirt,
commons are beginning to have docks that are not accessible due
to low water (92?.28 on 7-1-B8), trees planted in the last three
years are showing heat stress, beaches are not having high atten-
dance due to excess temps and the cemetery is as brown as it
could possibly be.
With less time spent mowing, we have been able to spend more time
doing maintenance repairs. We have been able to do projects that
were not a high priority but needed tending to, such as at Cen-
terview dock area, where there were a number of boulders in the
water when the lake was at 930.5, but appeared with the drop in
the table level. We have pulled these out, which allows
unobstructed docking.
COMMONS
The Shannon Dredge project is only in need of seeding. We have
held off unttl the weather will show some precipitation. We have
top dressed the area with black dirt and installed posts to limit
auto access.
We are close to finishing up with the city crew on scheduled rip
rapping for this year. Now we are attending to some of the small
areas, but expect to have completed repairs to the 1500 ln. ft.
by the end of August.
Last year we had four hundred and eleven docks with 587 boats.
This year began with the same number of sites but around 450
boats registered. This number of boats has increased to almost
587 again as we have inspected all docks and found unregistered
boats.
June 1988 Park Department Report
July 8, 1988 - Page Two
PARKS
The summer parks program has begun and the attendance seems to be
good. The weather has put some limits on programming, but the
leaders are working around it through use of school district
facilities.
A more in-depth report will follow a~ the end of this program in
July. This was the first year that the City of Mound had worked
in conjunction with Westonka Community Services to provide better
opportunities for the kids.
TREE REMOVAL
June was a slow month for city tree removals. We only had two
hazardous trees felled. We sent out four notices for hazardous
tree removals from private property.
CEMETERY
A survey has been done to look into the charges for lots at other
municipal and private cemeteries. This information will be for-
warded to you during the budget process for 1989.
JF/sk
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 1, 1988
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Joyce Nelson
Recycling Coordinator
June's Recycling
For the first 6 months of this year 83.83 tons of material has been
picked up this is compared with 66.21 at this time last year. This
averages to 13.97 tons per month and 420 households or about 14 per
cent of the homes in Mound. This figure does not reflect the paper
drives put on by Mount Olive Church or the Boy Scouts, the leaves
brought to the compost site this spring, or the waste oil deposited
at Crown Auto.
I'm still working on getting containers for Lake Winds, Grandview. and
Seahorse apartments.
June's pickup was 15.65 tons and 514 households.
An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national omgin, or hand~capped status
in the admission or a~:cess to. or treatment or emp!oyment in, rts programs and activities.
CITY of MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 5, 1988
To:
From:
Subject:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Greg Skinner
Water & Sewer Supt.
June Activity Report
In June we pumped 57,440,000 gallons of water. This is 22,838,000 more than May.
At this time last year we pumped 37,900,000 gallons of water, with the unusally
dry weather we still, at this time, see no need to impose a watering ban. With
the amount of water that is being used this summer it looks very doubtful that
we will be flushing fire hydrants. We will however still go to every hydrant to
clean the fitting's and oil the operating rod. Each year, as part of our
P.M Schedule, pull one of our well pump§ and casings. This year we will pull
our main well #7. This well we usally pull every 3 year§ but with the amount of
water it has been pumping we will do it 1 year earlier. This year we experienced
alot of unbudgeted exspense§, the Co. Rd. Project, Service line repairs, GV
repairs, etc.
Sewer Department.
The sewer department has finally completed the wet well and filter flushing.
They will now start on mewer line maintenance. We had one back this month
at Langdon Ln. We televised the line and found a good amount of grease in the line.
We cleaned the line then retelevised. At this time we found that there was
approx. 70 feet of line that had settled. Widmers recieved the bid to repair the
line. After the line was dug up we found that we had to relay about 180 feet.
At this time all is running down hill and we will continue to monitor the line.
An equal opportumty Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status
in the admission or access tO, or treatment or employment in, ~ts programs and activities.
MOUND FIRE DEPAR'TMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
,~(~/a/?d~r,..s LAST,..S Y~R ~ST Y~AR
KONTH OF KONTH MONTH TO BATE TO
.o. oF CALLS /'
MOUND - ;~ RE
g'TON~ KACH - ;I R;
EgER:ENCY
ORO.O - FI RE
EHERGENCY
SHOREUOOO - FI RE
EMERGENCY
SPR~.~ PAR~-
EHERGENCY
MUTUAL AID ~ FIRE
EHERGENCY
TOTAL FI RE .CALLS
TOTAL EHERGENCY CALLS
CO~ERICAL
RES I DENT I AL
INDUSTRIAL
~SS g HI SCEL~NEOUS
'AUTO
FALSE ALA~.
NO. OF HOURS - HOUND FIRE
EHERGENCY
TOTAL
- HT~ BCH ,FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
EHERGENCY
TOTAL
- O~ONO
. ;~E.GENCY
· TOTAL
- SHOREUOOD ~IRE
,~,MERGENCY
TOTAL
-SP. PARK FIRE
EHERGENCY
TOTAL
-HUTUAL AIO FIRE
~,v/~ EMERGENCY
TOTAL
TOT~ OR~ .OURS
TOT~C E~g~E.C~ .OURS
TOT~ ~ ~OURS
TOTa~ F~RE ~ E~ER~E~C~ HOURS
HUTUAL AID RECEIVED
HUTUAL AID GIVEN
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 5, 1988
TO:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
UNIT;
From:
Gregg Bergquist
City Mechanic
Subject: June Shop Report
This months shop work was;
#3~_87 CHEV - Normal service
7 78 CHEV- Normal service
9 85 CHEV - Normal service
16 75 CHEV - Repaiared power steering pump
17 80 CHEV - Built & installed tow hitch
18 70 FORD TANKER - Repaired high pressure hose
20 82 CHEV CAR - New clutch & rear engine seal
1970 ELGIN SWEPER - more brake repair
73 CHEV TANKER - Rear brake pancake
840 POLICE SQUAD - service
841 " " - service
843 " " - service, replaced mass air flow ssnsor
844 " " - service
An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national ortgm, or handicapped status
m the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities
Mound, Minnesota
REPORT
FO~ .o~ oF /?~2~
~Dt~ DATE DATE DRILLS DRILL MAIN. TOTAL HOURLY
.z _/~ z-,~ WAO{/~ WAOE~ HOUI~S RATE WAO_~
J. Andersen ~/ 'J ~- ' /'~-- -~ ~ 6,00 /y~ --
~. Babb / ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ 6.00 />~ _
J. Beauch~p / / ~ 1~ ~ /~ 6,00 /~,_
~,,~o~d / / ~ ~f- ~ ~/ 6.oo f~ -
~. Bryce / / ~ /q ~ 0 /~ 6. O0 //~/--
~, Carlson / / ~ /f- ~ /~ 6.00 1~-
~. Erickson ~ / ~ /~-- ~ ~ 6.00 ."'~t-
~. Ertckson / / ~ (%~
~ J g 6.00 / .7~ --
~. Heinz ~ ~ ~ /~ ~ //' ~.nn
~. Henderson ~ / ~ /~-- ~ ~ ~.nq
;. Johnson / / ~ /~ ~ /~ 6.00
{. Landsman / / ~ /~ ~ ~ 6.00
Y, Loraas / ~ / ~'.~-j ~ /~ 6, O0 &~.'
l'.. Marschke / / ~ ~/~- ~ ..~ 6,25
i.,. Nelson / / ~ YF~ 0 . ~ 6,00
.. Opitz / / ~ / ~'- ~ 23 6.00 /3~ ~ -
,g~m ~ / ~ /- ~ . ~ ' ~.oQ /~ ._
/. Rasmussen ~ ~ ~ /%- ~ /~ 6. O0
..' Savage ~ ~ ~ /~-- ~ /'~ 6.00
s~,~ ~ma. ~ ~ ~ /~-' ~ ~ ~. oo ¥~ -
J/ Swenson / / ~ /F- ~ ~' 6.00 /~ -
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
MEN ON DUT~
~ J. Andersen -O-- M. Nelson
~-- G. Anderson ~--- A. Opi~z
'--~-- J. Babb ~ B:' Palm
--~-- J. Beauchamp -'O-' G. Palm
~ D. Boyd --O-- M. Palm
-O- D. Bryce ~ G. Pederson
-- ~-- S. Bryce " ~
~- D. Carlson -- O-' T. Rasmussen
~ s. Collins %Z M. Savage
~ M. David ------- T. S~aii.~.
-"O-' B. Erickson '-'O" T. Swenson
~- S. Erickson ~ W. Swenson
Z~ J. Carvais "----~
~- L. Hei:z ~ R. Williams
·
~- C. Henderson ~- T. Williams
~_5 ~. Johnson ~-- 6. S~~
TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS
--~-- R. Marschke
~ J. Nafus
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364~
DRILL REPORT
Time
Time
Discipline and Team
WOrk
Critique of Fires
Pre-Planning and
Inspections
Tools. & Apparatus
Identifying
Hand~Extin~uisher-
Oneration
Wearing Protective
Clothing
Films
Pumper Operation ..,
Fire Streams & FrictionL .
Loss
House Burnings
Natural & Propane Gas
talk & Demonstrations
· ~adder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
First Aid and Rescue
Operation
Use of Self-Contained
Masks
Inhalator Operation
House Evolutions
Nozzle & Hose Alliance
Note:
Hours Trainin~ Paid
X Excused
X Unexcused 0 Present,
- . Tot paid
Miscellaneous: .
~l/~.~j Andersen
~/~ G Anderson
/_~J Babb
J Beauchamp
~'/~ D Boyd
~'/J_ D Bryce
~ S Bryce
_~-D Carlson
~--~m_~ Collins
.~ David
B Erickson
m~i/~S Erickson
~¥~J Garvais
.~L Heitz
C Henderson
~G Johnson
~%~M Kleeberger
~X'~J-B Landsman
~T Lo1~aas
Marschke
Nafus
~~ Nelson
Opitz
~B Palm
G Palm
.~~Palm
Pederson
__~T Rasmussen'
~~M Savage
~R Stallman
T Swenson
Swenson
"~ ~R Williams
~-~T Williams
Drillmaster
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-
DRILL REPORT
Date: &p~/~g
Discipline and Team
Work
Critique of Fires
Pre-Planning and
Inspections
Tools. & Apparatus
Identifying
Hand.Extinzuisher---
Ooeration
Wearing Protective
Clothing
Films
Time
Time
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams & Friction
Loss
House Burnings
Natural & Propane'Gas
talk & Demonstrations
.Padder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
First Aid and Rescue
O~eration
Use of Self-Contained
Masks
Inhalator Operation
House Evolutions
Nozzle & Hose Alliance
Note:
Hours Trainin~ Paid
X Excused X Unexcused
Miscellaneous: . ~*~~
· V',, ;q t;o
0 Pre sent
Not paid
~/~- J Andersen
~/~ G Anderson
..~______~J Babb
. J Beauchamp
~'~ D Boyd
-~7~ D Bryce
~S Bryce
__~D Carlson
' ~/A.S Collins
~/~M David
~_~!-~ B Erickson
~/~S Erickson
.~¥a-j Garvais
~1~ L Heitz
t~..~ C Henderson
G Johnson
~__~ M Kleeberger
~ B Landsman
-~ T Lolmas
~ ~ R Marschke
J Nafus
M Nelson
· A Opitz
_~B Palm
Drillmaster
~ G Palm
~)'/~ M Palm
~'lj_ G Pederson
Rasmussen
M Savage
R Stallman
Swenson
D ~/.Z- W Swenson
.~.~R ~ill. iams
II
.
TO =
FROH:
ty Manager, Members of the C!ty Counc! 1 and Staff
Jan Bertrand, Butldlng 0t=Flclal
SUBJECT= June 1988 Monthly Report
During the month of June, we had 22 working days. The Inspection/
Planntng Department has had 2 P1anntng Commission meetings on
June 13th and Z?th. I have attended three City Counctl mee=lngs
on June 14, 2], and 28th. Harge has attended the,Park Commission
and the two Planning Commission meettngs~ During the month of
June, Marge has submitted her notice of retirement as of June
1988. She was with the city of 'Mound For 15 years. The City
Council did award a recognition plaque at the June 28th meeting,
as well as held a retirement get-together at City Hall on June
Z9, 1988, at 2:30 p.m. For the Former working associates and
present council. The month ahead will be a difficult time in
replacing her, tn training a temporary service helper and then,
Finally, Finding a permanent replacement. We are hoping to have
someone on board permanently by approximately August 8th. It
will mean that the Inspection Department may have to obtain
outside inspection help during my time tn the office training the
new employee. The Following Inspections were conducted during
the month of June:
Site Inspections
Footing Inspections
Framing Inspections
Insulation Inspections
Drywall Inspections
Ftnal Inspections
Progress Inspections
Erosion/Grading Inspections
House Movfng/Demolltion
"# Heating Inspections
Plumbfng Inspections
Fire Sprinklers/Ft~e Code
Complaints
Total
,42
23
7
5
8
12
31
1
4
6
12
2
12
165
/7o7
June ]988 Monthly Report
July 7, 1988 - Page 2
This list of Inspections does not Include 2 Inspections conducted
by the substitute Inspector during my absence. The monthly report
for Hay was submitted to the City Hanager as ~ell as normal
correspondence, Inspection notices and reports to the Planning
and Zoning Commission. There were six residential plan reviews
completed during June.
The 'Planning Commission meetings In June revt~wed ~wo minor
subdfvlstons, one easement vacattoq, one condltlonal use permit
for oversize garage, and one amendment to a variance. The
Commission did review some comprehensive plan material as well as
the final draft of the Housing Halntenance Code. The July llth
Planning Commission meettng wtll be a Jotnt meeting with the City
Council. The Planning Co~mlsslon has asked that Jean Koone from
the Ctty of New Hope be present to explain what housing
maintenance entails. "
During June, I have Issued two Citations to a property owner for
damage to public right-of-way and Illegal dumping at the Lost
Lake site from his present construction project. ] made several
site Inspections with the ctty prosecutor, Craig Hertz, to look
at properties that were due to go into court in the month of
June. Also ! am spending some ttme reviewing a court-ordered
completion of a home on Baywood Shores Drive.
The city engineer and myself visited several sttes In dune
regarding new constructlon projects as well as compliance
received for drainage problems in two locations. ! met wlth the
SuperAmerlca area representative regarding some problems they are
having wtth soll set~lement by the south stde of the building.
I attended the regular staff meeting in June. The Northstar
Chapter of Building Officials met In St. Paul tn conjunction with
the League of Minnesota Cities. The topic at the June meeting
was all various applications of roofing', as well as the regular
business meeting. I attended a morning League of Minnesota
General Legislation committee meeting tn St. Paul. ! met wtth
Public Works to determine the schedule for demolition of two
buildings in Hound, one which was purchased by the city and the
other was previously fire-damaged. The schedule of disconnection
of utilities, stockpt, llng and Fi11, etc., were discussed. A
luncheon meeting was held In Medina for area building officials
to discuss the applications .of deck construction related to the
code. ! met with the apartment bufldfng owner to discuss his
plans for adding two units to an existing apartment. His
architects and surveyor have made corrections to their plans and
resubmitted them for bulldtng permits to be issued In July.
June 1988 Monthly Report
July 7, 1980 - Page 3
The city vehicle required the normal gasoline fills during June,
as well as a bath. ! picked up permit forms that were printed at
SOS, delivered Planning Commission packets this month due to
excessive postage, and the Housing Maintenance draft was sent
out.
The total number of building permits issued in June was 30, with
a valuation of $540,025. The valuation figures are attached and
the billing activity report for June is also attached.
In addition, Marge did prepare the monthly calendar for July city
meetings and events. She has arranged appointments for the
Inspections of buildings, plumbing, and the substitute inspector.
Marge did prepare the Park Commission agenda for June as well as
July and Planning Commission agenda, and written the minutes for
the Park Planning Commission meetings. The final proposed draft
of the Housing Maintenance Code, with the most recent revisions,
were submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council in
June.
* Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commission
requests and requirements, site Inspections for flood plain
verification, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as
no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance
notices, review status of various sites for the city prosecutor,
preconstruction meetings at the site for building permit
applicants or realtors, fire damage and periodic commercial
inspection updates.
*# The heating inspections during the construction of a project
are included under the framing and final inspection of the
building. The heating installations mentioned are for separate
equipment being placed in homes and businesses.
NOTE. -
IF YOU DON'T MAKE WAVES,
YOU'RE NOT UNDERWAY.
- Leonard P. Gollobin
JS/sk
3
CITY OF HOUND
5~1 ~,/woocl Ro~
c~
Strut ABclr~s
City .,nd ~tate
RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS
AND ALTERATIONS
70,0~0
2,~00
$a0,025.
~32,211~.
3,072,28~.
TOTAl.
289
I?//
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 7, 1988
TO:
FROM:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND
CITY COUNCIL
:/
JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER(--~~
RE:
JUNE 1988 MONTHLY REPORT
June of 1988 definitely was busting out all over. Because of the drought
of '88, peoples lips and throats are just as parched as the land. All
joking aside, the hot weather turned what would have been a great month into
a fantastic month. We surpassed last June by $11,151, and by 435 customers.
This month became the best month in our'history. It surpassed July of 1985
when sales were $93,400. To date, this year we are ahead of last year's pace
by $41,430.
We took our mid-year inventory Thursday evening between 8:00 and 12:O0 PM,
after we had closed. Nothing new to report on this matter, business as
usual.
Attached to my report is a piece from July 5th in the Star Tribune that I
think you should peruse if you haven't already. Read what you will from the
article. There is information here that I agree and disagree with. It does,
however, cover pretty much the whole gamut. The author did mention one thing
that made me chuckle. He or she, in talking to Mayor Dennis Stenberg of Hay-
field quoted him as saying, "The city simply didn't know much about managing
a liquor store." And later in the article, State Auditor, Arne Carlson, att-
ributed some of the problems cities were having with their liquor operations
to management. He says, "Those of us in government have little experience if
any in running a private business." That's why you have me! I've never been
in government before and I managed a private liquor store for five years before
coming here. So these references made to "poor managementI' are ludicrous and
defamatory.
JK:ls
~n equal opporh~ndy Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race color, natlonat origin, or handicapped status
in the admissiop, or access to. or treatment or employment in. its programs and actiwties
MINUTES OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING
dUNE 27, 1988
Present were: Chairman Thomas Reese~ Commissioners Vemn
Andemsen, William Meyer, Geo~ Michael, Kenneth Smith, Brad
Sohns, William Thal and Frank Weiland~ Council Representa%ive
Elizabeth densen~ City Manager Ed Shukle~ City Planner Mark
Koegler and Secretary Marjorie Stutsman.
Also' present were the ~ollowing interested persons: Shirley
Luger, de~ Luger and Virginia Lord.
MINUTES
The minutes o~ the Planning Commission Meeting o~ dune 13, 1988
were presented ~or consideration. On page 2, the ~i~th line down
should mead a 30 ~oot rear yard setback (rather than 20 ~eet). A
motion was made by Andersen and seconded by Weiland to accept
the minutes as amended. The vote was unanimously in ~avor.
BOARD OF APPEALS
1. Case No. 88-614 PUBLIC HEARING to consider a Conditional Use
Permit ~or an oversized accessory building at 6195 Sinclaim
Road~ Lot 6, Block 17, The Highlands~ PID No. 23-117-24 34
0071
Shirley Luger was present.
The City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his report stating that
applicant is proposing to bui)d an 1117 square ~oot garage. He
needs a Conditional Use Per~,t because any accessory building
exceeding 840 square ~eet under the Zoning Ordinance is required
to get a CUP. The proposed structure is two story with dormers
on ~ront o~ second ~loor; 1st ~loor is 24 by 28 ~eet and 2nd
~1oo~ is about 500 square ~eet o~ additional space which
applicant states will be storage area. Previously Mr. Luger
applied ~or a variance to lot size to establish a second legal
housing unit above what would have been the garage building.
This plan is the same, but does not include the living space 'and
applicant has stated he has no intention o~ establishing a second
dwelling unit. Use o~ buildings ~or habitable space is governed
by the zoning ordinance and the Uniform Building Code. Zoning
provisions do not allow the proposed storage space to be used as
living quarters. However, under the USC code, it is a habitable
area because the ceiling height is sufficient to meet code as
habitable space. Mark recommended that the ceiling height be
reduced thereby making the space permanently illegal as habitable
space (with slanted roo~, 50% o~ area has to exceed 7 1/2 ~eet)
ensuring that the new building will always be used only ~or
garage and storage. He is recommending approval subject to the
three conditions in his report.
It was questioned i~ placing the proposed garage over sewer and
i
Planning Commission Minutes
dune 27, 1988 - Page 2
water lines was a problem. Mark stated that, being on private
property, it was own,pis own risk; or they could run lines around
the building.
The Chairman opened the public hearing. Je~f Luger s~ated they
have no problem with the 7t5" second ~loor ceiling height. There
were no other comments ~rom the audience, the Chairman closed the
public hearing.
Weiland moved and Andersen seconded a motion to accept the
staff recommendations with the agreement that the old garage
be torn down and moved out. Allowed storage is to include
vehicles, household goods, tools and lawn and garden equipment.
The Commission discussed the intent of a CUP for a private garage
and also i~ requiring the lower roof was necessary.
The vote on the motion was all in favor.
This. will be on the City Council agenda July 12, 1988.
Case No. 88-715 PUBLIC HEARING on Vacation of Permanent
Slope Easement (4455 Radnor Road)~ Lots 9 and lC, Block 2,
Pembroke; PID # 19-117-23-34 003~
Virginia Lord representing owner, Jerome W. Studer, was
present.
The City Planner, Mark Koegler,~ reviewed John Cameronts letter
and gave background on easement. He stated issue goes back to
1967 or 1968 when street i~rovements were done. The City got a
slope easement over a portion of lot that already had a house on
it. Lot ll is owned by the City and is where the slope actually
is. The staff can see no reason ~or the City to retain this
easement and recommends approval of the vacation.
The Chairman opened the public hearing. Virginia Lord stated
this easement puts a cloud on the title and makes quite a
hardship ~or the owner. No other persons had comments, so the
Chairman closed the public hearing.
Andersen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to vacate the
slope easement recommended by the sta~. The vote was all in
favor; motion carried.
The public hearing will be held by the City Council on July 12th.
Commissioner Weiland asked to have John Cameron write a brie~
parmgraph giving e×planation/de~inition of slope easement,
Planning Commission Minutes
dune 27, 1988 - Page 3
DISCUSSION/INFORMATION
1. The Planner advised he will be sending the material to the
Commission on the Comprehens:ve Plan ~or their duly 11th
~eeting.
Housing Maintenance Code - It was noted that the Planning
Commission and Council will have a joint meeting on duly 11,
1988. Housing Inspector dean Coone o~ New Hope will also be
present. ~
The Commission discussed presentation o~ this draft and it was
thought there should be slides, overhead, etc. and Ms. Coone
could perhaps discuss how it can be implemented.
The City Manager noted that Marge Stutsman is retiring and that
the Council is going to recognize her at their meeting on
Tuesday.
Thai moved a motion that Com~,ission recognize the long and
e×ellent service that Marge has given the Commission over the
years and they ~ormally thank her. The motion was seconded by
the entire Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
Andersen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to adjourn the
meeting at 8:25 P.M. The vote was all in ~avor.
Attest:
Thomas Reese, Chairman
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-7033
FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERS
Robert Rascop, Chairman RE~D JUL I 1988
Shorewood
JoEIlen Hurr, Vice Chairman
drone
Carl H. Weisser, Secretary
Excelsior
Mark Westlund, Treasurer
Wayzata
Marvin Bjorlin TO** MF. MBER HUNICIPALITTES
Tonka Bay
Jan Boswinkel
Minnetonka Beach *
Richard U. Garwood DATE: June 29, 1988
Deephaven
Peter Hill
Victoria
Hen Kraemer
Spring Park
John Lewman '
Minnetrista Enclosed for your records is a copy of
Richard Nelson the Financial Statement of the Lake Hin-
Greenwood
Robert K. Pillsbury netonka Conservation District for 1987,
Minnetonka
Thomas W. Reese and an additional copy for posting.
Mound
Robert E. Slocum
Woodland The 1987 Financial Statement was accepted
by the Board of Directors at its regular
meeting May 25, 1988.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Executive Director
jm
enc= 2
Lake Minnetonka Conservation DistriCt
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
].987
LAKE
STATEHENT
OF
MINNETONKA CONSERVATION
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1987
CASH RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS,
DISTRICT
BALANCES
Fund
General
Petty Cash
Save the Lake
Total
Balance
1/1/87 Receipts
$ 53,345.19 $169,777.61
'200.00 100.00
75,707.37 23,856.29
$129,252.56 $193,733.90
Advance Payment of Dues
Fee Advances
Fee Deposits
Metro Loan
15,000. O0
Investments
Disburse-
ments
$137,993.27
22,969.66
$160,962.93
5,000.00
General Fund $ 94,307.35 $ 91,238.35 $ 25,000.00
Save the Lake Fund 68,141.57 11,882.02 5,000.00
Balance
12/31/87
$ 85,129.53
300.00
76,594.00
$162,023.53
'$ 21,458.00
67,882.50
4,800.00
10,000.00
$266,164.03
$160,545.70
75,023.59
Robert Rascop, Chairman
Donations
Other Income
Total Save
the Lake Fund
LMCD Communities
Other Income
Total
(dues)
Petty Cash Increase
Total General Fund
TOTAL RECEIPTS - 1987
Projects
Total Save the Lake Fund
CLASSIFICATION OF RECEIPTS - 1987
Save the Lake Fund
General Fund
$ 19,742.50
4,113.79
$ 23,856.29
$ 62,912.00
106,865.61
CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENTS - 1987
Save the Lake Fund
$ 22,969.66
$169,777.61
100.00
$169,877.61
$193,733.90
$ 22,969.66
LMCD 1987 Financial Statement
Page 2
CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSE~.~ENTS - 1987
(continued)
;rought Forward:
Save the Lake Fund
General Fund
$ 22,969.66
Administration
Personal Services
Salaries
Auditing Services
Total Personal Services
Contractual Services
Telephone
Postage
Printing
Utilities
Maintenance: Office Equipment
Janitorial Services
Inspections
Total Contractual Services
Commodities & Supplies
Office Supplies
Books & Periodicals
General Supplies
Total Commodities & Supplies
)ther Charges
Office Rent
Insurance & Bonds
Memberships
Employer Contributions
Mileage & Expenses
Total Other Charges
Capital Outlay
Office Furniture, Fixtures & Equip.
Total Capital Outlay
Legal
Legal Services
Prosecutions
Total Legal
Committees & Contingency
Water Structures & Environment
Lake Use
Executive
Total Committees & Contingency
Cash Fund Increase
Total General Fund
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS- 1987
1-15-88
$ 64,044.82
650.00
746.98
1,766.94
4,120.14
343.58
627.01
660.00
3,760.31
2,334.52
215.74
349.39
3,600.00
1,666.00
280.00
10,175.68
938.67
69.85
23,001.54
15,655.73
51.96
1,342.92
1,491.49
$ 64,694.82
12,024.96
2,899.65
16,660.35
69.85
38,657.27
2,886.37
100.00
137,993.27
$160,962.93
IV& I
A. THOMAS WURST, P.A.
CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A.
dAMES D. CARSON, P.A.
THOMAS Ir. UNDERWOOD, P.A.
CRAIG M. MERTZ
LAW OirlrlClr $
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & IV~ERTZ
A IIARTNER]BHI~I INCLUDING PROrE,SlONAL AS~OClATION$
I100 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA $5402
July 5, 1988
Mr. Ed Shukle
Mound City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Re: State of Minnesota, City of Mound -vs- Frank Buysse
Dear Ed,
By now you will have received a letter dated June.27, 1988
from Judge Duffy directed to the City Council. Please note that
the judge is not ordering the city to grant a variance. The
judge is contemplating that Mr. Buysse will meet with the City
Planner and reapply for a variance. In the event that the City
Council rejects the new variance application, the case will be
tried. Since Mr. Buysse already pled guilty, and since the judge
took the plea under advisement, the judge is apparently now
telling us that he will reject'the guilty plea if Mr. Buysse is
unable to obtain a variance by November 1, 1988.
As the judge notes in his letter, we did agree that the City
Prosector would not make any objection to the City Planner's
recommendation on an application for a variance.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Very truly yours,
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON,
UNDERWOOD & MERTZ ~'
Craig M. Mertz
CMM/lkg
Enclosure
#ll3/CM
STATE Of MINNESOTA
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
DAVID M, DUFFY
JUDGE
HENNEP~N COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5S487
June 27, 1988
Mound City Council Members
c/o The Honorable Steven Smith
Mayor of the City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
REC'D JUL I
RE: State of Minnesota, City of Mound vs. Frank Buysse
Dear Mayor Smith and Councilmembers:
This letter is written to inform the city council members of
the status of the case of State of Minnesota, City of Mound vs.
Frank Buysse and to clarify this Court's position relative to the
same.
This Court's position must be understood in the context of
the criminal justice system, the number of cases presented for
resolution, and costs associated with the various stages of reso-
lution. The earlier a case can be resolved tkrough plea negotiation,
or other means of settlement, the lower the ccst to the entire
criminal justice system, taxpayers and the parties involved.
With respect to the Buysse case, this is the type of case
which, I believe, should be resolved short of a jury trial with
all its attendant expenses. Moreover, a trial, regardless of its
outcome, would not resolve the underlying problem and would likely
be followed by further legal proceedings and costs.
The Buysse case can be resolved by reasonable minds and people
working together to arrive at a reasonable, solution. In point of
fact, Craig Mertz, the Mound City Attorney, Frank Buysse and his
attorney, Loren Gross, have reached just such an agreement requiring
Mr. Buysse to make capital improvements to his property ~n accordance
with the recommendations of the city planner. Specifically, the
agreement is as follows:
Mr. Buysse will enter a guilty plea to an amended ordinance
violation as a petty misdemeanor and the city will dismiss
the misdemeanor ordinance charges. This will resolve the present
criminal case.
City of Mound
Page Two
Craig Mertz, Frank Buysse, and his attorney, will meet with
the city planner to adopt a plan incorporating the city
planner's previous recommendation, dated January 5, 1987,
wherein it was recommended that Mr. Buysse construct a
wooden bumper height barrier along the northern edge of the
paving. He will also change the angle of parking stall lines
without diminution of the number of parking stalls. This
latter provision was not contained in the January 5, 1987,
city planner's recommendations.
Mr. Mertz will recommend to the city council that a variance
be granted consistent with the recommendation of the city
planner and Mr. Buysse will bring his property into conformance
with the recommended variance if this city council approves
the variance. ~
The city attorney agrees that no new criminal charges, or
civil actions, will be brought against Mr. Buysse until after
November 1, 1988, excePt as such action ma~' relate to separate
operative facts. However, in the event no agreement can be
reached or this city council rejects the proposed modified
variance or any party fails to perform as required by this
Court's Order, then the present criminal action will go to
trial before this Court on the petty misdemeanor ordinance
violation. This, of course, will not resolve the underlying
· problem or prevent subsequent litigation.
Ail parties will enter into settlement negotiations in good
faith to resolve this matter.
This agreement is to the benefit of all concerned. The city
will have brought Mr. Buysse's property closer to conformance with
the purpose of the ordinance. Mr. Buysse will have been penalized
and will have expended money in the form of legal fees, fines,
and other costs associated with bringing the property into conform-
ance with the city planner's recommendation. In return, Mr. Buysse
and his tenants will have the additional parking they need.
Mr. Buysse will avoid having a criminal record. Moreover, everyone
will be saved the time and expense of a trial in this matter
and future litigation costs.
Finally, this Court feels compelled to clarify its position
relative to its initial request to settle this case and your
resultant Resolution No. 88-74. First, the resolution indicates
a possible misunderstanding of this Court's motive in requesting
that the parties attempt to settle this case. The resolution
addresses Mr. Buysse's alleged support on the city council for
the granting of a general variance and quite clearly states that
Mr. Buysse did not have such support. I was not motivated in
City of Mound
Page Three
the least by Mr. Buysse's alleged support on the city council.
In fact, my perspective was that Mr. Mertz, the city attorney,
was vigorously prosecuting tkis case and representing his
client accordingly. I, however, thought, and do think, this
case should be settled and hope that this city council will
approve the agreement as previously set forth.
Your consideration and time are greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
David M. Duffy
DMD/mvw
cc:
Mr. Craig Mertz
Assistant City Attorney for Mound
Mr. Loren Gross
Attorney for Mr. Buysse
Councilmember Abel
Councilmember Jensen
Councilmember Jessen
Councilmember Johnson
Court File No. 3126096
aesociat[gn of
metroool tan
municipalities
ETD JUL 1988
June 30, 1988
Mr. Edward Shukle
City Manager
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ed:
You are invited to a 'dutch treat' breakfast meeting on Tuesday
July 19th. at 7:30 A.M. We will be meeting at the Minnetonka
Community Civic enter Complex, 14600 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka.
(West of 1-494 on Minnetonka Blvd. to Williston Road stop light,
North on Williston Rd. to 1st. building on right)·
Please R.S.V.P. to Carol Williams at 227-4008 by Friday noon July,
15, 1988.
This "get-together", sponsored by the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities (AMM), has several purposes:
To provide member city officials the direct opportunity
to help establish the yearly AMM agenda and work program
with respect to city issues and concerns
(local-regional-state). Issues raised at this meeting
will be forwarded to the appropriate policy committees.
We have enclosed issue papers on some major topics for
which we specifically wish to receive input.
To provide the AMM Board and Staff the opportunity to
appraise you of major program and issue priorities as
seen by the Board'and Staff.
To discuss the Legislative Contact Program established
last year by the Board to determine its effectiveness and
how to make it work better.
To provide a forum to educate selected non-member city
officials in your area as to what the AMM is and what it
does.
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
We expect this to be a very informal gathering with lots of give and
take. -
The impetus for this series of meetings originated in the
recommendations put forth by a Membership Services Committee study
of the AMM services and operations. The study concluded that there
was a need for better and more direct communication and dialogue
between the AMM office (Board and Staff) and member city officials.
We sincerely hope you can attend and that you will pass on this
invitation to members of your City Council as well. This
invitation is being sent directly tq Mayors,
Managers/Administrators and the designated Legislative Contact
person for your city.
We look forward to seeing you on July 19th.
Most Sincerely,
Gary an, AMM President
Maplewood City Councilmember
Karen Anderson, AMM Boardmember
Minnetonka City Councilmember
MAJOR ISSUES
*LEVY LIMITS
BACKGROUND
The 1988 Legislature adopted very restrictive levy limits for 1989
and 1990. Special levies except Bonded Debt and certain pensions were
all eliminated. The 1989 increase maximum was held to 4% plus growth
over the actual 1988 levy plus aids and the 1990 increase was set at
3% plus growth of the 1989 levy plus aids. Cities under 2500
population are exempt.
CURRENT POLICY
The AMM opposes levy limits but if necessary to have, suggests a
reasonable base increase be keyed to the Implicit Price Deflator for
state and local government expenditures plus growth with the inclusion
of the 1987 special levies plus additional specials for mandated
expenditures and comparable worth adjustments.
OPTIONS
Continue current policy working for restoration of specials and a
return to a reasonable increase index such as the Implicit Price
Deflator.
B. Accept Levy Limits as imposed and spend time on other issues.
C. Oppose all limits strenuously.
D. Trade for 'Truth in Taxation'.
*TRUTH IN TAXATION
BACKGROUND
Truth in Taxation is a provision of the 1988 Tax bill which is not
effective until the 1989 budget period for payable 1990 taxes. It
might be a reasonable alternative to levy limits but becomes an
overburdensome waste of time and money with levy limit continuation.
If it does stay in law, it provides a notice similar to current tax
statement by August 1 to property tax payers indicating the level of
tax anticipated in the next year. A public hearing will be held and
the actual budget adopted. Several problems exist if no changes are
made. New assessed value figures are needed by August 1. These are
not currently available until December. Budget activity would have to
start about two months sooner than current to meet an August 1 date.
Anticipated budgets would probably be set high since they could only
be adopted as proposed or lowered at the hearing. The system will be
costly', in that initial proposed tax statements and newspap- '
requirements cost money, possibly as much as $5 million statewi~
Cities, except those under 2500 population, ~schools and counties are
included.
-1-
CURRENT POLICY: (NONE)
OPTIONS
Attempt to work with the legislature to modify the law to make it
workable for cities and counties.
Be
Oppose this provision as an.additional costly time comsuming
waste and fight for its elimination or delay.
Try to trade this provision for levy limits and make it workable.
'FISCAL DISPARITIES
BACKGROUND
The AMM Fiscal Disparities bill as proposed did pass the Senate Ta ~
Committee to the floor of the Senate but was not taken up due to th...·
insistence in the House that the bill would not be acted upon there
The bill was bottled up in the House Metropolitan Affairs Committee b'
the Chairman, St. Paul Rep. Tom Osthoff. House Tax Committee Chair
Rep. Gordon Voss, Blaine, also indicated strong opposition to change
as proposed. About 15 cities contribute 90% of the net FD dollars
This amount is excel,rating rapidly. While major objection to the AM
position was lowering the contribution rate from 40% to 30%
legislators and other groups supported the rest of the provisions
However, the oppponents did not agree with the premise that nea',
future rapid contribution increases by the major losers plus political
redistricting would ultimately jeopardize the entire program. Onl~.
time will tell if the AMY compromise was correct. It is anticipate¢
that because of the lack of reception for the AMY program that
possibly Hennepin County along with some of the major losers might
take a shot at repeal in the next year or two.
CURRENT POLICY
Support Fiscal Disparity program with modification to include, phase
in the 1971 base value at 5% per year, 'phase in South St. Paul at 5%
per year using current value excluding pre 1979 TIF as base value,
continue pre 1979 TIF exemption except that new project value
requiring new bonded debt be included, exclude all vacant land, repeal
the minimum distribution and times two factors, include personal
property (mobile homes) market value in the fiscal capacity factor for
distribution calculation, utilize median sales ratio adjustments and
equalize to 85 or 90% for contribution value, reduce the contribution
rate from 40% to 30% over 5 years and oppose any attempt to utilize
the Fiscal Disparity pot for other metrcpolitan purposes.
OPTIONS
A®
AMM to try to reaffirm support from at least 80% of the membership
to continue the current policy. Partically this may be difficult
since several of the initial supporters have already indicated
strong feelings towards dropping the issue.
Drop the policy and let the various pro-con factions take the
issue on separately.
Try to find a middle ground that does not drop the contribution as
far as 30% and possibly come up with some type of trade off.
~HOMESTEAD CREDIT
BACKGROUND
The new tax law retains the homestead credit for payable 1989, but
abolishes it in payable 1990, replacing it with a transition aid. For
payable 1989, the credit would continue to equal 54 percent of the
gross tax paid on the first $68,000 of homestead value. However, the
maximum credit would increase from $700 to $725. The law keeps the
agricultural credit for payable 1989 in the same form it existed for
payable 1988 except no agricultural credit is available for seasonal
recreational property. The agricultural credit, however, will go to
all taxing.districts, not just to schools as under current law.
Beginning in 1990, the law eliminates homestead and agricultural
credit and replaces them with a new aid program called transition aid.
The transition aid for each local taxing jurisdiction will be
roughly equal to what that jurisdiction receives in 1989 from the
homestead and agricultural credit minus three percent of the
jurisdiction's net tax. Allocation of aid among local jurisdictions
will be in proportion to their levy for payable 1989.
Beginning in 1990, the new tax law provides to local units a homestead
and agricultural credit guarantee. This provision guarantees a taxing
jurisdiction that the amount it receives from the sum of education
aid, transition aid, disparity reduction aid, local government aid,
and county income maintenance aid will be greater than the homestead
an agricultural credits it would have received computed under the 1989
homestead credit law. The law provides additional aid to fulfill this
guarantee. For 1991 and subsequent years, the transition aid is
frozen at the 1990 level.
Although the law eliminates homestead credit in 1990, homeowners'
property tax statements will continue to show a 'state paid homestead
and agricultural credit'.
As it stands the law states to the public that there is a homestead
credit but actually creates an aid instead. Th~ 'aid'
theoretically guaranteed and frozen, however, that is only binding ~n
the adjourned 88 legislature, 1989 is a whole new ballgame with a new
set of players. The newly created 'aid' may be reduced, left alone,
or increased independently from whatever is written on the property
tax statement. It should be pointed out that the initial transition
aid is reduced by 3% of the area net tax and that the guarantee of
homestead replacement amount is made up of transition aid plus other
aids.
CURRENT POLICY
The AMM opposes elimination of homestead credit and supports the
continuance of two separate pots: Homestead Credit and LGA.
OPTIONS
Ae
Maintain the current policy and lobby vigorously for keeping the
homestead credit as is for 1990 and beyond.
Be
Same as A but develop or support a method to cap/control the state
expenditure for Homestead Credit to eliminate the legislative
argument that Homestead Credit is an uncontrolled open ended state
expenditure that promotes local spending.
Take no position or support the 1988 law replacing homestead
credit in 1990 with a 'guaranteed' transition aid, mainly because
the dollars are probably about the same, the end result of all the
programs will probably be about the same, and the difference is
probably a matter of semantics.
· COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE LEGISLATION
BACKGROUND
The Governor's Advisory Council on State-Local Relations undertook a
thorough review of the states planning and zoning laws in 1987. The
LMC was a participant in that study and as a result of this study, a
bill (HF 1888/SF 1759) was introduced early in the 1988 Session which
would have substantially altered the municipal planning and zoning
authority. The main features of the bill included combining the
planning and zoning authorities of cities, counties and towns into a
single body of law; mandating the creation of a local Board of
Adjustment which could not be the City Council; changing the
requirements of undue hardship to an easier c%andard of practical
difficulty and prohibiting the practice of condi'~onal zoning.
The AMM Board of Directors, acting upon the recommendation of a
special task force of local officials, asked the Legislature to lay
the bill over for further study and analysis. The Legislature agreed
to this request and the bill was not acted upon. The bill was
supported by the County and Township Associations and is sure to be
reintroduced in the 1989 Legislative Session.
CURRENT POLICY
The AMY has no ongoing policy on this issue except for a general
policy statement which states we need to preserve 'existing land use
controls'.
OPTIONS
Oppose the bill in total since there is no real problem with the
existing municipal planning law and there is really no advantage
to cities to have a 'combined' local government planning law.
Reactivate the special task forte and identify desired changes in
the municipal planning law but oppose combining municipal, county
and town authorities into a single law.
Take no position and leave the
LMC.
city lobbying on this issue to the
*TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
BACKGROUND
Nearly every legislative session brings bills to 'fix' TIF proble. ·
and 'tighten up' slightly the perceived loopholes. This last session
was no different· Through many grueling sessions, city lobbyists were
ab e to modify the proposed changes so that minimum damage was done.
Economic development districts in the metro area were restricted by a
federal definition whereby TIF cannot be used if over 25% of the area
is recreational or food related. .Soils condition redevelopment is
limited to a 12 year duration. Additional fiscal statements are
required· Counties may recover administrative costs. New districts
will be limited to increment from the original mill rate, the excess,
if any, goes to each local taxing unit· Other changes were made but
the overall impact is not great. Next year, however, the authors have
promised major studies and reform? Counties will seek approval
authority and road costs. Caps in the form of a percent of total
market value will be at issue. The 4 year knockdown for pre 1979
districts will again be an issue. These and other issues are sure to
arise.
CURRENT POLICY
Preserve Tax Increment Financing as an Economic Development Tool
without substantive change.
OPTIONS
A. Resist all efforts to modify TIF further.
B. Initiate TIF legislation to solve some of the perceived ills in
order to head off potentially bad legislation.
This past year the AMY assumed a very active role in the TIF
debate. Should the AMY continue as a very active player in
debating, proposing and dealing with TIF issues or should the AMY
revert to a more supportive background position.
*METRO TO OUTSTATE FUNDING SHIFT
BACKGROUND
In 1986 46% of the total aids and c~edits were being distributed in
the Metropolitan area as compared to 54% ~o outstate while 64% of all
state revenue was collected in the metro~.olitan area. The gap has
been widening at the rate of 2% plus per year for several years. The
Education Property Tax levy m thod is such that as assessed value
increases the education dollars raised locally increase and state
school aid decreases. Because of the split ratio for homestead
taxable value and the high metro area property value versus the low
outstate value, the metro taxable value increase significantly more
per home than outstate. Thus, there is a continual shift of school aid
outstate. Decreasing farm values are increasing the value disparity.
Also, in 1987, the school funding was changed so that districts
(mostly metro) that were off the formula (i.e. no school aid, all
funds raised locally) in essence gave the excess dollars raised back
to the state for redistribution in school aids. All of this plus a
couple of provisions in the 1988 tax bill significantly exacerbate the
shift in state funding to outstate in 1988 and 1989 and possibly
beyond.
CURRENT POLICY
The AMY supports legislative review of the distribution of tax revenue
to metro and non metro areas of the state to insure that the imbalance
of shift to non-metro is not exacerbated.
OPTIONS
Continue a policy calling for a study to determine the extent of
imbalance.
B. Strengthen the policy to strongly oppose any increased imbalance.
C. Oppose the current imbalance as
the shift.
'too much' and support reducing
-6-