The URL can be used to link to this page

1988-08-09 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 1988 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Approve Minutes of July 26, 1988, Regular Meeting. Pg. CASE %88-716: Warren & Alvina Shaffer, 3106 Priest Lane, Lot 1, Block 2, Highland Shores, PID #23-117-24 34 0075 REQUEST: Setback Variance Pg. Application for Sign Permit - Westonka Muscular Dystrophy Association - MDA Telethon Pg. 4. SET PUBLIC HEARINGS: P & Z Case #'s 88-720 & 88-721. Consider a Zoning Amendment and Conditional Use Permit for Public Lodge, Meeting Hall and Club, at 5098 Three Points Blvd.: Lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 8 and 9, Block 2, Dreamwood; PID #13-117-24 12 0017/0018/0020/0021/0022. Pg. Be P & Z Case #88-722. Consider a Conditional Use Permit for a Print Shop Located at 5271 Shoreline Blvd.; Lots 7-20, 26-35, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit F, PID # 13- 117-24 34 0072. Pg. Ce P & Z Case #88-723. Consider a Conditional Use Permit Wetlands Alteration for 4841 Bartlett Blvd; Part of Government Lot 8; PID #13-117-24 44 0001/ 0002/0010. Pg. Approve frontage and improved right-of-way variances for property owned by the City of Mound located on Westedge Blvd. PID #23-117-24 22 0005.Pg. Approve the sale of city-owned property on Westedge Blvd. (PID #23-117-24 22 0005) and authorize Mayor and City Manager to execute sales agreement. Pg. 7. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens present. Change Order #4 - Public Works Facility· (Materials to be distributed Tuesday evening.) Page 1775-1780 1781-1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795-1808 1809 1773 e 10. 11. 11. 12. Payment Request #3 - Public Works Facility (Material to be distributed Tuesday evening.) Request for Use of Mound Bay Park - Bass Fishing Tournament - Weigh-In Facility - August 27 & 28 - Minnesota Open Bass Classic's. Pg. Pg. Pg. DISCUSSION: Possible Budget Resolution Payment of Bills. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS ae Department Head's Monthly Reports for July, 1988. Pg., Be Minutes of the July 25, 1988, Planning Commission Meeting. Pg. Ce Notice of Rate Increase from Triax Cablevision (formerly Dowden), effective November 1, 1988 pg. De April 1, 1988, Population Estimates as Provided by the Metropolitan Council. note that our estimated population has increased to 9951. Please Pg. Ee Travel information on the NLC Congress of Cities to be held in Boston, Massachusetts, December 3-7, 1988. Pg. Fe Informational luncheon for local government officials in the Lake Minnetonka area will be held Wednesday, August 10, 1988, at Minnetonka Country Club. It is sponsored by McCombs Frank Roos and the City of Mound. The program will be presented by representa- tives of Hennepin Parks on various park issues. Please let Fran know by MoDday, August 8, if you want to attend, pg. Ge Information from Hennepin County on Purple Loosestrife. Pg. He Notice of Public Hearing on establishment of a solid waste tipping fee for Hennepin County. Pg. Notice of LMC Regional Meeting, Monday, September 12, 1988, at RObert Lee's (Hwy. 694 & Silver Lake Road). Please let Fran know by Tuesday, Sept. 6, if you plan to attend. Pg. Page 2 1810-1811 1812-1816 1817-1831 1832-1871 1872-1878 1879-1881 1882-1884 1885-1888 1889 1890-1900 1901-1902 1903 1774 11o July 26, 1988 MINUTES -- ~ODITD CITY COUI~ClL -- P~EGUI~R SESSION The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 26, 1988, at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: city Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr, City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson, The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten- dance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MINUTES MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to approve the minutes of the July 12, 1988, Regular Meeting, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC ~ARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was $2,438.60. .Mayor Smith opened the Public Hearing regarding delinquent Utility bills. There was no one present in the audience who wished to speak on this issue. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing and turned the item back to the Council. Jessen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 88-106 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE TEI' DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,438.60 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAF~ TO SHUT-OFF WATER SERVI~E TO THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. LOGIS HEALTH CARE PLAN The city Manager explained that the City of Mound has been a par- ticiPant in health care plans sponsored by Hennepin County for several years. Last fall, Hennepin County dropped the HMO's they had been using for a less costly plan called Family Health Plan. 42 other suburban cities, including the City of Mound, got together and retained the HMO's' they had under the Hennepin County plan. During the first six months of 1988, the 42 cities involved in the program formed a subcommittee to look at what the options were. They recommended that an "Agent of Record" be utilized to negotiate health insurance coverage on behalf of the cities 111 July 26, 1988 involved. LOGIS is the legal entity by which the Agent of Record would function. The Agent of Record, DCA Healthcare Management Group of Minnetonka, has been authorized by the LOGIS Board to negotiate to retain the existing coverages now offered by the three ~IMO's with the intent to keep the premium the same or with minimal increases for 1989. In order to participate with the LOGIS group, it is recommended that the City of Mound adopt a resolution approving of participa- tion in the LOGIS Healthcare Group. Abel moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #88-107 RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE LOCAL ~OVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (LOGIS) HEALTH CARE PROGRAM The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT There was no response. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - SECTION 456:80, SUBD. 2 The City Attorney stated that the Police Department is asking that Section 456:80, Subd. 2 be revised: Notice. Within 24 hours after any animal has been im- pounded, the poundkeeper shall sha~-a~se make a reasonable attempt to give oral or written notice to the owner where known. Johnson moved and Abel seconded the following: ORDINANCE %12-1988 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 456:80, SUBD. 2 OF THE CITY CODE DELETING THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE POUNDKEEPER POST NOTICES OF IMPOUNDMENT The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: ADDING SECTION 700:11 The City Attorney stated that the Police Department is asking that the following. Section be. added to the City Code to cover the riding of vehicles on sidewalks in a dangerous or hazardous man- ner. 2 112 JUly 26, 1988 Section 700:11. 'Stop at Sidewalk~; Drlvin~ on Sidewalk~. The Driver of a vehicle within a business or residential district emerqinq from an alley, driveway, or buildinq shall stop such vehicle immediately prior to driving onto a sidewalk or into the sidewalk area and shall yield the riqht-of-way to any pedestrian and all other traffic on the sidewalk. No person shall ride or drive, except for crossinq at an al- ley, driveway, buildinq, or other authorized crossina, any motor vehicle, bicycle, motorcycle, motor scooter, motorized bicycle, skateboard, or other vehicle or device which is operated in a danqerous or .hazardous manner upon any sidewalk within the limits of this municipality. Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the' following: ORDINANCE %13-1988 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 700:11 TO THE CITY CODE REQUIRING TRAFFIC TO STOP BEFORE CROSSING SIDEWALKS AND REGULATING THE OPERATION OF VEHICLES OR DEVICES ON CITY SIDEWALKS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS MOTION made by Jensen, seoonded by Abel to authorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $386,266.14, when funds are available. A roll ¢all vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ADD-ON ITEMS RESCHEDULE SEPTEMBER COUNCIL MEETING The City Manager explained that the first meeting in Septem- ber falls on the Primary Election day, September 13. He is recommending changing the first meeting to September 20, 1988. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to reschedule the first meeting in September from Tuesday, September 13, 1988, to Tuesday, September 20, 1988, at 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. GOALS FOR BUDGET RESOLUTION The City Manager explained that the Mayor has submitted a proposed resolution entitled, "Resolution Establishing Goals for City Manager on Developing 1989 Budget Requests" for Council consideration. 113 July 26, 1988 The Council discussed the content of the ~roposed resolution and requested the following items: A. The amount of money that would be generated under the current millrate with the new valuation. B. A list of expenditures that the City Council knows it has committed that was over the 1988 approved Budget, i.e. comparable worth, etc. C. A list of other items that the Council has dis- cussed funding in 1989, i.e. a newsletter. The Council then asked that the Mayor request a budget from the Task Force on Drugs to substantiate the $5,000 he has requested in his proposed resolution. N° action was taken. This item to be brought back to the Council at the August 9th meeting. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS Monthly Financial Report for June 1988, as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. B. Minutes of the June 9, 1988, Park Commission. Ce The 65th Annual National LeagUe of Cities Conference will be held in Boston, Massachusetts, December 3-7, 1988. Please let us know as soon as possible if you plan to attend be- cause of hotel reservations. The deadline for early registration is September 5th and the sooner the better for hotel accommodations. D. REMINDERS: - Park Commission and City Council Parks Tour, Thursday, July 28. Meet at 5:00 P.M., ~enior Citizen Center - will return at approximately 9:15 P.M., when pizza and pop will be served. .Cost is $5.00 per person. - Lake Minnetonka Mayor's meeting will be held at Mound City Hall on Saturday, July 30, 1988, from 9:00 - 11:00 AM, to discuss Lake Minnetonka Regional Park issue and the ability to condemn private and public lands.' Eo The City Manager submitted correspondence and material be- tween the City Attorney and the L.M.C.D.'s Attorney relating to the Surfside Dock Permit. Fe A letter and material from Jean Coone, General Inspector for the City of New Hope relating to a housing-maintenance or- dinance. Ge A memo from the Park Director regarding weed harvesting and the cost of weed harvesting equipment. 4 114 July 26, 1988 Lake level, flow. and precipitation summary for June 1988, as provided by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Letter from Minnetrista thanking Mound for supporting their legal challenge to the legislation allowing the override of local approval for the acquisition and condemnation of land for a Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. MOTION made by Abel, seoonded by Johnson to adjourn at 8:10 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, city Clerk 5 BILLS JULY 26, 1988 BATCH 8071 BATCH 8072 Lowe 11 s Coast to Coast Super America Navarre Hdwe Precision Striping Sheraton Midway June parts June supplies June gasoline June supplies Striping streets, 'lots Room-Linda Strong-Clerks Total Bills School 255,797.11 126,746.35 192.oo 336.18 889.59 94.2l 1,965.o8 245.62 386,266.14 Mound City Council, Au~st 9, 1988 Alternate Proposal for Setback Variance rren and Alvina Shaffer i06 Priest Lane '(Lot l, Block 2, Highland Shores; PID 23-117-24 34 0075) The home was constructed in 1974o RECO~*dE4~ATION: That the existing deck and screen porch be reconstructed with 8' from the existing house to the back yard and 4' from the existir~ house ~o the side (the lakeside) yard. This reconstruction would reduce the side yard deck and screen porch from 8' to 4'° It would allow a deck exit for the second floor patio door and retain the architectural integrity of th· house by projecting the screen porch beyond the existing house. The setback from the lake would be the same as in the staff proposal, about 19'. Reasons: 1. The town maintains its control over setbacks on the flood plain. 2. The owner avoids having an u~ly "floating" house. I I II Plat of Survey William N. Johnson J PP/E~' "eA~ Certificate of Survey: I hereby certify t~t this is a true ~nd ~orreet repre,~ent~t~on of a survey of.the bc~ndaries o* Lot, 1, Ploo'.~ 2, T{i~bl.~nd Sborns, and the ~rono~-ed location of a .~rn~o~ed b,~ L?.!n!:. Tt doe~ not pur- port to show improvements or encroach~ntr. Scale~ 1" = 50' Date : ~-4-70 o , ~ron marker L~nd Sur~,eyor and Planner bon~ Lake, ;'~nnesota PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 88-716 RESOLUTION 88- RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS FOR LOT ], BLOCK 2, HIGHLAND SHORES; PID #23-]17-24-34-0075 (3106 Priest Lane); P & Z Case #88-7]6. , WHEREAS, the applicant has applied For a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming lakeshore setback of ]4.5 feet to allow structural modifications to a deck and screened-in Porch for Lot ], Block 2, Highland Shores; P[D #23-]17-24-34-0075; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-I single Family zoning district, which accorOing to the city code requires a 50 Foot setbacM to lakeshore, lO foot sideyard setback, and a 30 Foot Front yard setback; and, WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) proviOes that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful nonconforming.. residential unit when the alteration will improve the livaOility thereof Out .the alteration may not increase the number of units, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval with modifications to the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as Follows: That the city does hereby authorize the existing nonconform- ing principal structure setback to lakeshore at 3106 Priest LanO; PID #23-117-24--34-0075 with an approximate ]9 Foot setback. 2. The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation and authorizes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and expresseO unOerstanding that the use remains as a law- Ful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. .~ It is oetermineO that the of the resiOentiai unit I ivaoi lity will De approveO Dy authorizing the following alterations to a nonconforming use property Oue to the narrowness and shape of the parcel: existing decK, PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO, 88-716 PAGE TWO with screened-in porch, shall be reconstructed~tz~ ~ the existing main house~l~m~er, ~aJJ~~e~ F~-o~ ~,e~^,-'°~:t~,,..~ ~=t~ ...... ~, t~as~ ,-~, ~, ~,,~ ,,o~,~ffu,,u,~,uncu upon the survey being revised to indicate the exact location o~ the structure and the shoreline setback.~ This variance is granted ~or the ~oilowing legally described property: Lot ], Block 2, Highland Shores PID # 23-117-24-34-0075 This variance shall De recorded with the county recorder or the Registrar oF Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, Section 462.3595; Subdivision (4). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used· The property owner shall have the responsibility for Etling this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording· The building permit shall not be issued until prooE dE recording has been Eiled with the City Clerk. CASE 88-716 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and S~aE~ FROM: Jan Bertrand, Butldtng Official Planning Corm~isslon Agenda of July 25, 1988 CASE NO. 88-716 APPLICANT: Warren F. and Alvlna T. ShaFFer LOCATION: 31.06 Prles~ Lane LEGAL DESC.: Lot 1, Block 2, Highland Shorest PID 23-117-24 34 0075 SUBJECT~ Setback Variance EXISTING ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential PROPqSAL: The applicant Is proposing to do structural nx~dfF~catfons to an extstlng open deck with an enclosed screened- in po~ch below. The extstfng setback of the screened-in porch' and deck ts approximately 14.5 Feet to the lakeshore applicant is.' proposing to remove the · The screened-in porch and deck and reconstruct It, as the deck has rotted, as well as the screene~ porch. COMMENTS: The home on the lot was constructed In approximately 1970. At that time, the survey showed the lakeshore actually coming tn to the lot almost to the corner of the proposed building. A copy of the original survey is attached. Stnce that time, the lakeshore has been Filled and rip rapped along the property line to the south. In the year 1978, the city had established Flood plain elevations For Lake Mlnnetonka of 929.4 n.g.v.d, which requtres a setback to structures of 50 Feet. The existing setback to lakeshore is approximately 14,5'. This setback of 50' Is actually the side yard of this particular lot. RECOMMENDATION= Staff recommends that-the existing deck could be reconstructed fn line with the extsttng main house, with the screened-in porch underneath It. The south side of the 1or, abutting the lakeshore, should have Just a four foot walkway on the south side, which would allow some type of structure alongsfOe of the extstlng patio door. Thts would have a setback to lakeshore with a four foot walkway Instead of the eight foot projection, of approximately 19-20'. The survey that was submitted should be revised to Indicate the exact location of the existing home and shoreline. This would require that the original surveyor return and set the building and shoreline on the Lot 1, Block 2, Htghland Shores described parcel. C~se 88-?16 Page T~o The abutting neighbor has been notified, Thts will be re~erred to the city council meeting on August g, "1988. Ci~ OF HOUND (Please type the followlng infornmtlon) Street Address of Property ~3106 ~iest ~ne, Mound, ~m. 55364 Legal Descrlptlon of Property: Lot 3. Owner's Name Warren F. & Alvina T. Shaffer Day Phone No. 472_6636 Address 3106 Priest Lane~ Mound~ Mn. 55164 4. Appllcant"(if other than owner): Name Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: (X) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ) Amendment ) Sign Permit )*Other If other, specify: 6. Present Zoning District /~'-'/ 7. Exlsting Use(s) of Property Residence e Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes If so, list date(s.))of l isx date(s) of application, action taken anU provide Resolution No.(s) '7~7-- ~O~ Copies of previous resol~itions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and th~- statements contained in any required p~p'ers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for.the purpose or )n~spect~ng~ orjof posting, maintaining and removing Such notices as may be req,,ire~y//law. Signeture of Applicant ~~ V~~ e7 Date , Planning Commission Recommendatio Council Action: Resolution No. [~quest for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure (2) Case # 8~'-716 ~- D.. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utiJities, et~. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections .of the Zoning Ordinance. III..Request for a Zoning Variance .A. All information below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of the property'conform to\al~) use regulations for the zone district in wh, ich it ls located? Yes/~) No ( ) If "no", specify each non-conforming use: Ce Do the existing structures comply with'all area heig~];~and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is.located? Yes ?~.) No ( ) If "no", specify each non-conforming use: D. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses.permitted in that zoning district? ~ .Too narrow ( ) TopOgraphy ( ) Soil ( ) Too small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface (~). Too shal!ow ( ) Shape { ) Other: Specify: E. Was the hardship described above created by the action o~ anyone having property Ipterests | the land after 'the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by any'otheF man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No(~ If yes, explain: .on)y to the property described in this petition? Yes () No If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. sheets, if necessary.). (Specify, using Attach additional I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? 88-716 88-716 Plat o£ ~urvey For William N. Johnson o£ Lot 1, Block 2~ Highland Shores · . Hennepin Oounty, Minnesota I LAA~ /~INN£7'OIVI~A CertiFicate o£ Su,-veT: I hereby certify' tb~t this is a true ~nfi correct renresent~t~.on o~ a ~-urvoy o£ the bc~mdaries o* Lot 1, and the ~rono.-ed location o~' a proposed b~ L~inr. ~t d~es net ~ur- DOrt to sbo~ improvements or encroachments. Scale: 1" = 50' Dete : P.-4-70 o : Iron marker Gordcn ~ Coffin Reg.- N~'/(~n64 Land 3ur~'eyor and Planner lmng Lake, ~'A1nnesota MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING JULY 25, 1988 Present were: Chairman Thomas Reese; Commissioners Vern Andersen, William Meyer, Geoff Michael, Kenneth Smith, Brad Sohns. and William Thal; Council Representative Elizabeth densen; City Planner Mark Koegler; Building Official Jan Bertrand and Secretary Susan Krebs. Frank Weiland was excused due to t11ness. Also present were the following interested persons: Shaffer and Alvina T. Shaffer. Warren F. MINUTES The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of duly 11, 1988, were presented for consideration. Jansen moved and Sohns seconded a motion to approve the minutes as printed. The vote was unanimously in favor. A copy of dean Koone's letter was handed out. dan Bertrand suggested that any changes in the rewording of the draft of the housing ma intenence code be done by the housing subcommittee, forwarded-to her office, and returned to the Planning & Zoning Commission at the next meeting August 8, 1988, or at the training meeting in the end of August. BOARD OF APPEALS !. Case No. 88-716 Setback Variance---3106 Priest Lane, Lot 1, .Block 2, Highland Shores; PID Z3-ii7-Z4 34 0075. Applicants Warren F. and A1vtna T. Shaffer were present. The Shaffers are proposing to do structural modifications to an existing deck with a screened-in porch below; the existing setback of the screened-in porch is approxtmate)y 14.5 feet to the lakeshore. The home was built in 1970 and purchased in 1976; In 1978, the city established flood plain elevations for Lake Mlnnetonka of 929.4 N.G.V.D., which requires a setback of 50'. The Butlding Official, Jan Bertrand, suggested that rather than allow a deck that will project close to shore, the deck and screened-in porch below be kept In a projected line with the edge of'the home, which wi11 shorten up the projection to shoreline by 4' and give them a setback of approximately 19'. This would require a 30' variance. The south side of the lot, abutting the lakeshore, should have just a four foot walkway on the south side to an existing patio door. Chairman Tho~s Reese asked the ShafFers if they were satisfied with the staff's recommendation; the Shaffers said that although they would accept the compromise, they would prefer to rebuild the existing deck/porch as it had been, both because they felt it does not affect anyone else in the neighborhood and because they want the porch to tie the house into the land architecturally. Planning &Zontng Commission Minutes July 25, 1988 - Page Two Geoff Michael proposed that the Shaffers be able to replace the structure; Jan Bertrand pointed out that both the ordinance and the land have changed since the original structure was butlt. It was moved by Brad Sohns and seconded by W111Iam Thal to approve the staff recommendation. The vote was slx in favor, with two (Smith and Michael) opposed. The motion carried. In further discussion, Smith explained his opposition to acceptance was because the Shaffers were not asktng to expand the structure but just wanted to bring it to code. William The1 expressed his concern that non-acceptance might set a negative precedent in future. Brad Sohns fel.t the compromise to be a good solution and one that followed the criterion for granting of a variance. This will go before the City Council on August 9, ]988. APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT . CITY OF HOUND OF APPLICANT Westonka Muscular Dystrophy Association ADD~£$$ 5241 Shoreline Blvd. Mound Street Number C1t¥ PHONE N0, 472-2939 Zip 'BUIL~ING OWNER (lf'otheK than applicant) Name Ad d res s CONTRACTOR." Name Address SIGN LOCATION· See be'l ow LOT · BLOCK' ADDITION ALLOWABLE SIGNAGE @ % =" WALL AREA ....... BYI EX!STING SIGNAGE' · .... DESCRIBE SIGN (Materials, etc:) · Ft. = TOTAL NUMBER OF S ! GNS ' Square Footage · ZONING DISTRICT sq. FOOTAGE OF SIGNS HEIGHT OF SIGN GN. S I ZE BEi NG REQUESTED BY sq. FT. LENGTH OF TIME SEASONAL SIGN TO BE ERECTED: now until September 6, 1988 ILLUMINATED: YES TYPE OF SIGN: WALL MOUNT, FREE STANDING PORTABLE NO OTHER PLEASE DESCRIBE REQUEST AND REASON FOR REQUEST: 3 display outdoor slBns (4' x 8') at the fo]'lowi'nq locations: l. County RnRH 11~ A Thrum Pnlnt: Rlwd. 2: 'Mound Bay Park 3. The City parkinq lot across from Ben Franklin. Promoting the MDA telethon which will be at the Pond Area.'on Sept, 4 & 5. Is s|gn for a corrcnunSty organization and does It meet all the standards, of Section l'f additional l,nformation, is attached, please submit 8½" X 11" maximum sized drawingS. Please waive any fees as this is a ./~~.,).~x(.~(.~_...~ charitabie, non-profit eveht, for the State of Minnesota MDA Association. A~plicant's Signature August 2, 1988 Date submitted co~mendatlon: APPROVED: Building Official HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A ZONING AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PUBLIC LODGE, MEETING HALL, AND CLUB, AT 5098 THREE POINTS BOULEVARD: LOTS 12, 13, 14, 15, 8 AND 9, BLOCK 2, DREAMWOOD; PID # 13- 117-Z4-12-OO17/OO18/OOZO/OOZ1/OOZ2. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound., Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 1988, to constder an application for a conditional use permit and zoning amenOment for a puDltc lodge, meeting hall, and ciuO, at 5098 Three Points Boulevard, legal description: Lots 8 and 9, 12-15, Block 2, Dreamwood; 24-12-0017/0018/0020/0021/0022. PID #13-117- A!! persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be heard at th ts meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Ci-erk "August 8, 1988 PuDItshed in, "The Laker, . THREE' I;'OINTS BLVD. [-. :,.,,! HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT FOR A PRINT 5HOP LOCATED AT 527I SHORELINE BOULEVARD; LOT5 7-Z0, 26-35, BLOCK l, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT F; PID # 117-24-34-0072. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of th~ City of MounO, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341MaywooO Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 1988, to consider the issuance o~ a conditional use permit ~or the installation and operation of a print shop located at 5271 Shoreline Boulevard, legal description: Lots 7-20, 26-35, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit F, PID # I3- 117-24-34-0072. All persons appearing at said hearing with reEerence to the above will be heard at this meet lng. ,_~x~bc~J~- C. t~_~%/~~ Francene C. Clark, City Clerk : "August 8, IgBB PuD1i. shed in', "The Laker, . I EDEN HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WETLANDS ALTERATION FOR 4841 BARTLETT BOULEVARD; PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8; PID #13-117-24-44- 0001/0002/0010. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341Maywood Road at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 23, 1988, to consider a con- ditional use wetland alteration permit at 4841 Bartlett Boulevard, legal descriptions Part of Government Lot 0001/0002/0010. 8; PID # 13-117-24-44- .All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above wi !1 be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City'Clerk published in, "The Laker," August 8, 1988. August 9, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FRONTAGE ~ND IMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIANCES FOR PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY OF MOUND LOCATED ON WESTEDGE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on August 9, 1988, to consider the issuance of variances from Sec- tions 23.403 (1) and 23.604.5 (2) of the Mound Zoning Code to permit the sale of land .and the construction of a single family residence on property located at xxxx Westedge Blvd. ( PID #23- 117-24 22 0005); and WHEREAS, Section 23.402 (1) requires lots to have fron- tage on improved public accesses and the property in question lies near but not immediately adjacent to an improved public access and Section 23.604.5 (2) requires 60 feet of frontage in the R-1 zone and the property in question has 33 feet of frontage creating a 27 foot property width variance; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and determined the following: The property is appropriate for a residential use and should be returned to the tax rolls. Future development options exist for the provision of a full 60 foot wide frontage for the subject parcel. The property will front on an improved public right-of- way with minor grading improvements and rock placement. The Planning Commission unanimously approved the sub- ject variances. WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Commission has reviewed the request and recommended the following: That the City hold the property until a determination can be made of the recreation value based on the development of the surrounding land, i.e. railroad right-of-way, possibly become a part of a trail system or see the what outcome of the Hennepin Park plan is. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the lot width and improved public right-of-way variances for the property lo- cated at xxxx Westedge Blvd. (PID #23-117-24 22 0005). Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes July 25, 198B-Page Four 2. Fence Ordinance Revision. Section 23.4t5 (4) g.) planner presented new wording for the fence ordinance. The city it was moved by Vern Andersen and seconded by Geoff Michael to accept the changes to the wording of the fence ordinance. in further discussion, BIll Meyer suggested removing the word "a11" from the ordinance in the sentence, "Fences shall be installed such that the finished side faces all abutting properties." The motion then passed unanimously. A public hearing on the fence or~inance will be held on August 22nd at the Planning Commission Meeting. Sign Ordinance - Section 365:05, Subdivision 8. The city planner stated that there was a provision in the sign ordinance that said that if the permitee/owner failed to remove or alter the sign so as to comply with the provision, they had 30 days to remove it. He cited a case in which ~ person with an illegal sign dt~ not remove it Until 30 days had passed, as Der. the ordinance. He recommended removal of the "30 day" clause, substituting it with, "immediately," and allowing the butlding official some discretion in the speed in which it was removed, depending upon the individual sign. A motion was made by Smith and seconded by Sohns to approve the suggested modification of the. sign orOlnance for a puOltc hearing. It was passed unanimously. A public hearing on the sign ordinance wi11 be held on August 22nO at the Planning Commission Meeting. 3.a) Variance for street frontage on Westedge, City of Mound, part of Government Lot 4, Section 23, Township 117, Range 24. This item was referred back to the planning commission from the city council. The city planner recommended that the property does. require a variance. He sai~ that the piece of property is city property and is slightly over three acres. The city now has a purchase agreement from a would-be buyer. Koegler cited a section in the zoning code that says a lot of record may be used for single family detached dwelling purposes, providing the area thereof meets all setback and minimum lot area requirements proviOed (1) it has frontage on an improved public right-of-way; he said that the clause has .brought about two debates as to the definition of "frontage"- does it mean 60 feet for R-t, or does frontage mean frontage (1', 2', 3', etc.). The city planner stated that in ~iscussing it with the city attorney, the worO "improveO" is what causes this to come back for a variance, it 4 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes July 25, IgBB-Page Five Odes aOut right-of-way Out does not abut the improved portion of the right-oF-way because the street veers into Minnetrista. He asked that the planning commission look at this and see if it finds merit in the granting of a variance to allow this to be established as a butiOable 1or with the 33 Foot Frontage that is there, and there woulO be a connection made between it and WesteOge. He also stated that it was a very time-sensitive issue which is why Ed Shukle, CiTy Manager, asked that it be aOded to this meeting's agenOa. Mark Koegler brought up that there are different standards used for 1ors of recorO for a number of things, and cited as example Page 32, which lists the R-I qualifications on lot width requirements and in which a 1or 40' to BO' wide has less setback requirements for a lot oF record than for a newly-created lot, six feet on one side instead of ten. Further,. if a new R-l lot is being created, it must nave 60' of width and ten Foot sideyard setOacks, but if there is an existing lot of record that is 99' wide, only eight Feet are required on one side, with ten feet on the other. He further argued that this clause to the ordinance is different, an exception from normal standards, and doesn't say, "60' of Crontage," but rather "¢rontage," and that the property has Crontage. However, though interpretive, he felt that this right- of-way was probably not considered improved. LIz Jensen Drought up the discussion at the city council meeting and that John Cameron, City Engineer, Dad suggested even putting gravel on the right-oF-way to improve it, at a cost dE approximately $I,000. She also pointed out the difficulty in getting to the property unless one goes across land that is in Minnetrista, and the need to provide access. Chairman Reese voiced his opinion that the property was not needed as more park land, as Mound has plenty, and while he could sympathize with the residents that had submitted a petition and wanted to keep it as open land, it was 'not necessary nor could anyone else be able to get to the property easily if it were designated as park land. Bill Heyer proposed that a recess be called during which time commission members could go and look at the property and Chairman Reese called for a 20 minute recess. After the recess, discussion dE the variance request continued. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes July 25, 19BB-Page Six Chairman Reese asked the city planner what the wording would be on the variance and Koegler suggested covering both bases, the lot width requirements as spect6ied in 23604.5 and 6rom the provision on existing lots of record, 23.403 item 1, with '"improve~," to allow creation dE a Duildable lot with 33' frontage on a presently unimproved puDltc right-dE-way, which will be improved. In ~urther discussion, Smith asked who would buii~ the roadway to give the property ~rontage, and Jan Bertrand answered that tt was part o~ the purchase agreement that the city provide access to the property. Jensen again stated that, per city engineer John Cameron, that oDltgation could De met with a gravel roaO. Koegler said they woul~ be structuring the wording to reference the motion tn the resolution Doth to the 1bt o~ record section where it states, "improved," and to the R-! provision that states, "60 Eeet." Liz Jensen suggested that the commission include in its findings that this commission does find that residential development is proper planning for the site. Koegler agreed that the language of the request reflect the planning commission's ~inding that residential is the Oest use, as we!.1 as the 'commission's agreement that a right-of-way De improved, as both are concerned with the larger issue of planning. Bill Meyer moved and Michael seconded that a resolution be put together ~or the council with a statement o~ ~tndings that wi11 Include some discussion of the planntng ~indings and the fact that there are future right-of-way options for extending the existing 33' right-of-way that ts there, and that the variance specifically will be to sections Z3403 an~ 23604.5, with referenced subsections, with discussion o~ lot width and improved aspects of the public right-of-way. The vote was unanimous. In further d~scusston, it was decided that when the housing subcommittee finishes with the draft revisions, Jan Bertrand, Building Official, will give the final draft o~ the housing maintenance code to the planning and zoning commission and a date will De set or a public hearing. L~z Jensen noted the informational item, housing market study, 4 B., as being one particularly o¢ Interest. MINUTES MOUND PARK ADVISORY COMMISSION JULY 28, 1988 Members present: Nancy Clough, Marilyn Byrnes, Phyllis Jessen, Shirley Andersen, Cathy Bailey, Stephen Burke and Linda Panetta. Also present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Liz Jensen and Don Abel. Staff present were: Jim Fackler, Parks Director and Martha Mayer, Supervisor of the Summer Parks Program. The Park Commission and other persons mentioned attended a tour of the following Mound Parks and Commons: Dove Lane Commons, Wawanossa Commons, Woodland Point, Canary Beach, Waurika Commons, End of Three Points, Crescent Park, Three Points Park, Wiota Commons, Clover Circle Park, Langdon Park, Westedge Site, Indian Mound Park, Sinclair/Lagoon Park, Ridgewood Access, Highland Access, Twin Access, Highland Park, Mound Bay Park, Belmont Park, Waterside Access, Brighton Commons, Swenson Park, Avalon Park, Pembrook Park, Doone Park, Black Lake/Excelsior Lane Access, Kemmore Commons, Avon Park and Carlson Park. The tour began at 5:00 PM and concluded about 8:30 PM, with the tour returning to the Westonka Senior Center. Nancy Clough opened the meeting at 8:52. She opened the discussion regarding the City owned property on Westedge Boulevard. Jim F@ckler sammarized the issue. He stated that the City had an offer to sell the property. There would be a single family home built on this property. This property issue was referred to the Planning Commission for review. The Planning Commission felt the variance should be granted to allow access to the property for the purpcse of c~.nstructing a home. They felt that this land was not neezed for parkland. The Park Commission now has the issue for review. Liz Jensen updated what the Planning Commission had discussed. A recommendation was made by Cathy Baily, seconded by Shirley Andersen to: Recommend that the City hold the property until a determination can be made of the recreation value based on the development of the surrounding land, i.e., railroad right-of-way, possibly become a part of a trail system or see what the outcome of the Hennepin Park plans is. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 28, 1988 PAGE 2 The recommendation passed with the following vote: Yea: Bailey, L. Panetta, S. Burke, S. Andersen. Nay: Obstain: M. Byrnes. The meeting was adjourned at 9:38 PM. Clough, Jessen. 1%oo I I PETITION Concerning the sale of PUBLIC, City owned lands for private use. Lef~al D~scription of Subject Property: "That part of Lot No. 4, Section 23, Township 117, of Range 24 according to Government Survey thereof, lying north of the north- erly boundary line of the Burlington Northern (Now Dakota Rail) Railroad right-of-way in the City of Mound, ( Triangular property north of the Metropolitan Sewer Plant on Westedge Boulevard ). We, the undersigned, request that the City of Mound through its duly elected officials, respect the wishes of their constituents to disallow the sale of such property for private use for the following reasons: 1.) Approximately 20 years ago subject parcel of City property along with wet lands surrounding the present sewer plant facility and several City purchased parcels of tax delinquent property along the north shore of Lake Langdon south of the Dakota Rail right-of-way were recommended by the Mound Park Commission, at that time,'to the Mound City Council to be set aside and maintained as open space, "green area" and future recreation area for public use and appreciation. Since that time, the status of all of the above sites and entire north- western and western shores of Lake Langdon have been maintained as such. A sewer maintenance and access trail has been main- tained along the north side of the railroad tracks continuing into subject property which is enjoyed by many residents of Mound for hiking and recreation. We believe there is no reason to change the status of such property; and since public funds and. the power of Eminent Domain were used to acquire the land it should be maintained for Public use as recommended above. 2.) 3.) In April, 1982 Subject parcel of land was being considered for rezoning and private sale, at which time neighboring resi- dents petitioned for the above consideration and facts. At that time sale of su~ect land was. dropped. ( See attached copy of Notice by City of Mound )'. In 1986 subject land was considered as a site for a new Public Works Facility. On November 4, 1986, a Public Referendum strongly rejected such a facility to be located here for the above reasons and many others. Subject Parcel (approx 3 1/3 acres) is contiguous with a 27 acre virgin hardwood .forest i~nediately to the north and Cit' designated Wet Lands to the south across the railroad tracks (See Mound Wet Lands Map attached; Ordinance No. 429, Sec. 23.1100, August 3, 1982). The property also serves as an out ~¢~h area for two major creeks which drain an approximate 60 Petition: Sale of Certain Public Lands in the City of Mound Paqe ~ acres of water shed district to the north.. A substantial portion of subject property is comprised of slough and wet land which should be maintained in keeping with Mound Wet Lands Ordinances which is committed to "Providing wet lands preser- vation, protection and maintenance since they ccnstitute impor- tant physical, esthetic, economic and recreational assets for existing and future residents of the City". The Ordinance also is committed to "Preserve the location, character and extent of natural drainage courses". There is much in the way of natural and historic significance to this area in that western Lake Langdon was once the site of an Indian village in the late 1870's and perhaps the last remaining untampered Indian Mound in Hennepin County still survives just south of the R.R. tracks. 5.) 6.) Rather than squander Public Lands for immediate financial gain, We urge this Council to take stock of the situation pertaining not only to this parcel, but to the entire vicinity which is owned and maintained by the City of Mound in order to better serve this Community ecologically, esthetically and recreationally. Case in Point: Hennepin County is now negotiating for Park Land in Minnetrista along the south shore of Halsteads Bay whereby .they intend to spend SMillions to re-create what once was offered to them as a Gift 35 years ago. Due to lack of foresight it was refused. We certianly do not wish to see the City of Mound proceed in the same fashion due to lack of foresight, and planning, allowing haphazardry and neglegence to consume our future. We hereby strongly urge that the City of Mound continue to maintain subject parcel of property as as open space "green area" to serve as an esthetic, ecological, and recreational asset to our community. Respectfully Submitted: July 12, 1988 Name Address ~o.~. ~~. 2Bi , ~r~% ~%. Petition: Sale of Certain Public Lands in the City of Mound Page 3. Name % Address %o'-} Petition: Sale of Certain Page 4. Public Lands in the City of Mound Address I ,? '!! ,L !' l 0 l Blaltet PURCHASE AGREEMENT Minne~.onka .ECE,VEDOr Steven &. and Beth Homo1& as Husband anc~M~'~'fe ~STEDGE RO~. MOUND ~ FOR LEG~ DESC~PTION (incl~lng ~tlln blin~l), curtain ~1, trestle ~t, O~ry ~1, lighting flxturll ~d ~t~, plumbl~ flaunt, ~t Wlt~ t~ E ~tl~ pl~t (~th ~y ~rhe~, tln~, ltoke~ aM otW IOuipNnt ~ Iff ~n~Jon t~ewlth), water ~t ~ liquid g~ link ~ ~flt~ll (if t~ ~Qy Of HI~ Rump pum~, tel~llon ~t~n~ Inclnerltor. ~llt .In dllhw~r ~d Om~ge dl=~l~, ~llt .In ~nl, ~llt.in ~ t~ Ileal, ~11 ~K~ ml~ O~ · XZ~ ~HOUS~D ~ 00/~00 ......... ~ 30 ~ 000.0~, wh~h tM ~ ~s to MY iff t~ t~;~,;~ ~ ~ ICC~T,~nyi~ ~St M~y C~k I~11 ~t ~ ~t~ ~ ~ until thai ~WC~ ~t.~t with which it ~ ~ t~r~ il ~1~ ] I~ t~ Ii~lt ~ c~k mull ~ i~iitlly rltu~ If Ibis ~C~ IgrN~nt Il ~. a.~t,,~t,.c, of:s24. 000.00 Wft.,.cl,g-.ap,c,~inCONTRACT FOR DERD ~it Ir~ l~ premiHl prior to ~l~lli~ dill. S;~E~ WAR.NTt ALL HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING, WIRING AND PLUMBING USED AND L~ATED ON SAID PREMISES ARE IN PROPER WORKING ORDER AT DATE OF CLUING. It t~ DurChaler'l ODti~, I~ all ~l Dlt0 ~tUQr shill ~ refun~ tO him. O~tahng ex~nsel, shall ~ ma~ Is of DAY OF POSSESS ICN ~ ~ller s~11. withi~ I ~el~nable time after a~rovll of this a~ment, lurmlh in I~ltract of title. Ota R~ister~ P~y Abltrlct ce~lfi~ to lille I~ within 10 0ays after wfitte~ nohce to t~ ~yer. t~ ~l~es S~iII ~m this age.merit acc~i~g to itl terml. I~ ~i~, a~ neithe~ ~incipll shall ~ liable ~or ~images ~reun~er tO the Ot~r princi~a[. All mo~ey the,etofore pai~ ~ the buyer shill i~O sa~d agent Is t~ir res~ctive interests ~ly i~lr, Is liQuiOltl~ ~amlgel, time ~ing of the essence her~f. T~il ~IiOK Shill ~t ~rt~ eit~r ~l~y Of I~ the ~ of I buye~l default hereunder, IIIle~ may exercise Itltutory Cl~Clllltlo~ with I ~ day ~otlcl ~ri~, 6alault, Men'itl Lynch RalltylBumet will not make S legal Infirm'elation of iny prOflllonl rllltin0 to dlsbumemant of elrl~ll mOnlll. bllemlflt, Or dlmlg~ ClUlld by Wltlr of IN build.up on thl r~f of Ihl I~Vl dllcfl~d ~dy, uflllll Mild Off Ittl~d Id~ndum ~d that buyer ~llel solely u~n ~onal Inl~ctlon of the ~y a~ ~ t~ following et~temeflt by t~ teller hll~ hd a w~ Check ON : ~lle~ ~cknowl~ga8 providing, and Buyer acknowledges re~lvl~ ~ IIIl~nt gl pm~y ~dltlon on Iffached ldde~um. : Buyer Icknowledgel( ~lllr hal not p~ovldld I statement of pr0~y eondltio~ and Buylr mlill iolely off hal own Inl~cflon of It iS un0erstoo~ and agreed that tis sale is made subject to the approval by the seller of sa~cl p,emises, in writing which Ipprovll, agent has Oays to obtam, anti that the undersigned agent Is in no matter lisble or resDonsible on ICCOUnt of tni~ a;:~reemant, except to return of account lot the earnest money palc under this contract. ItlpulallS thai ~tlhe it reprelenti~ t~ q ~T.T.~ iff this tflnlaCti~, Litfi~ lgenl or listi~ b~e~ slipulltll thll NI$~ Is ,epre~entlng t~ seller I~ thil ttlnS~tlon. . . The Oehvery gl all pl~rs an~ men,es Shill ~ ~&Oe It the office of . MERRILL ~Y~H REALTY/~ INC~ Sales Ass~ate ~.~/e a;,e~e~, o~ ~e s~,e ~,~v~aoe term~o;~nl,ofle~ a.~ ~ec~ ~2 a~t co~,~o~s he,em e~messe~./ / ,.-.~ / ./ .~ - :/'~' /- - ? FINANCING SUPPLEMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT Contract for Deed G O?E Pi'~-?~NT LOT ~%~~~ closing of buyers present home at 6690 Co~t~side Dr. Eden Prairie, whichever comes first. DUE ON ~ ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ~able to acquire an easement for street and utility ~ur~ose fro~ the oro~ertv o~ner directly west of thls parcel. Ingress and egress to the property shall be over said easement to %~estedge Road. The City shall have 30 days after the signing of 'thls agreement to acquire said easement. It Is furthe~ understood and agreed that the Buyer , shall be a11~ved tO drlll a ~ell to supply water to the home to be constructed on thc prem&s&s. The deed conveyln9 the property shall restrict and limit the propet:v fro~ further subdivision or development until complete municipal utllltles, are aval)able' to the oronerty and the property may have only one residence ontthe premises until co~lete ~unlclnal utilities are constructed. ~ee Attached I_eo~1 ~e~crlntlon. MERRILL LYNCH REALTY/BURNET, INC. /,,/.,:~ ~ . . . Date A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD, SEEK COMP~ENT LEGAL ADVlCE~ August 9, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88- RESOLUTION APPROVIN~ THE SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY ON WESTEDGE BLVD. (PID %23-117-24 22 0005) AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ~ CITY MAI~AGER TO EXECUTE SALES AGREEMENT AND QUIT CLAIM DEED WHEREAS, the City of Mound owns property described as PID 923-117-24 22 0005; and WHEREAS, the City indicated it would like to sell this property, listed the property with a real estate agent.and the agent found a willing buyer at the price the City requested; and WHEREAS, the frontage and right-of-way variances required to build a single family dwelling have been approved by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the sale of property described as PID %23-117-24 22 0005 and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute a sales agreement and a Quit Claim Deed for this property. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk 1 AUGUST 4, 1988 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ~. y.- ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER USE OF MOUND BAY PARK - AUGUST 27 & 28, 1988 We have received a request which is attached from the Minnesota Open Bass Classic's organization, regarding the use of Mound Bay Park for a weigh-in on Saturday, August 27th and Sunday, August 28th. The weigh-in would begin at approximately 2:30 PM on each of the days. Based upon past requests, I asked Tom Reese, City of Mound's representative to the LMCD, to comment on this request. He called me and indicated that the LMCD has encouraged these types of activities to be held at private marinas around Lake Minnetonka. He emphasized how heavily utilized Mound Bay Park is, particularly on weekends. He would prefer not to have the weigh-in facility at the Mound Bay Park. However, he indicated that recently the Council did approve a request for Howard Tripp. It would only be fair that Mr. Gerber of the Minnesota Open Bass Classics be given the same treatment. He also indicated that in the future, the Council ought to establish a policy that these types of activities not be held at Mound Bay Park. Therefore, the City's representative to the LMCD position is that this request would be OK to approve at this time. He asked that the Council consider seriously eliminating any of these types of tournament activities from Mound Bay Park in the future. He also mentioned that the last orgainzed meet;that was held at Goose Island was done well and that the bass tournament officials need to be complimented on how well their tournaments have been organized in recent months. ES:ls CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA MFRA #8257 ITEM NO. 1 Substitute epoxy sealer for colored hardener on concrete slabs in repair bay and wash bay. ITEM NO. 2 Construct footings for entrance pads. ITEM NO. 3 Change location of tank fill for water truck. ITEM NO. 4 Install backwater valve between footing drain and roof drain. ITEM NO. 5 Change location of sewer service. ITEM NO. 6 Eliminate thermal break on exterior doors. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 Original Contract Amount Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 4 Revised Contract Amount Add Add Add Add Deduct $ Add $ Add Add Add Deduct ~d $ 679,000.00 14,700.00 3,142.00 725.00 1~011.00 $ 698,578.00 800.00 663.00 $ 328.00 $ 5Os. O0 $ 654.00 $ 340.00 $1,011.00 APPROVED: Mc~ombs Fran~ Ro6s Associates~-~nc._ Loeff~l-Engstrand City of Mound Mc-Combs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Twin Cities St. Cloud 15050 23rd Ave. N, Plymouth, MN 55447 Telephone 612/476-6010 Engineers Planners Surveyors August 5, 1988 Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: Public Works Facility MFRA #8275 Dear Ed: Enclosed is Loeffel-Engstrand's Payment Request No. 4 for work completed through July 31, 1988, on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $110,570.50. We have reviewed this request, find that it is in order, and recommend payment, in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact US. Sincerely, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven W. Jantzen, P;E., 'A-;%.A SO:jmj 0 I+ YYYY 0 z 0 Minnesota Open Bass Classic's Tournament Trail July 27, 1988 Mr. Ed Shukle City Manager Mound 5341 Maywood Rdo Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle The Minnesota Open Bass Classics Tournament Trail has scheduled one of our six qualifying tournaments on Lake Minnetonka. The dates of the tournament to take place on Lake Minnetonka are Saturday and S'~auday Augus~ 27th and August 28tho We have organized the event to begin at 7 A.M. both mornings, and the fishermen will be mustering and beginning the tournament from GOOSE Island in Spring Park Bay. A permit for the use of the Island has been granted by the Hennipin County Parks. We wowld respec:fully request that the City of Mound grant us a permit for the use of the Mound City Park at the old Surfside location for our tournament weigh-in and awards ceremony. The weigh-in both days will begin at 2:30 P.M. Be would anticipate 80 to 90 two man teams to fish this tournament. We have also been issued a permit from Zhe Department of Natural Resources to conduct a fishing tournament. We also have applied Zo the Lake Minnetcnka Conservation District and the Sherri£fs WaTer Patrol for the necessary permits. ~e of course will instruct all the fishermen to conduct Vhemse!ves on the lake s~nd at the weigh-in ~ocations with :ne .~oh~st of standards We will of course ooiice ourselves and insure that the park is !ef~ in the same manner as when ~e arrive. ~ ~,~ ~: ~r hel~ please feel free to contac: me ~h~king you in a~v~ce for your support ~ad consideration. ~iuc e~el~ ~ ~ P.O. Box 185 Mound, Minn. 55364 ~O 446-9~6 Minnesota Open Bass RO. Box 185 Mound, Minnesota 55364 CiTY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 · .AUGUST 4, 1988 TO: FROM: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ~.~, ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER RE: POSSIBLE BUDGET RESOLUTION FOR 1989 - GENERAL FUND ONLY At the July 26, 1988 Council meeting, you discussed a proposed resolution establishing goals for the City Manager on developing 1989 budget requests. You discussed the content of the proposed resolution as submitted by Mayor Smith and requested the following items: The amount of money that would be generated under the current mill rate with the new assessed valuation. B. A list of expenditures that the City Council knows it has commited that was over the 1988 approved budget, i.e. comparable worth, etc. Ce A list of other items that the Council has discussed funding in 1989, i.e. City newsletter, etc. Attached is Mayor Smith's proposed resolution. my response to what you requested above: The following is CURRENT MILL RATE AND NEW ASSESSED VALUATION The current mill rate* applied to the estimated 1989 assessed value (as.sessed value has increased from $71 million to $75 million) would yield approximately :$80,000 in additional revenue. However, it is unlikely that we will be levying taxes for that amount. We have levy limits that are set each year by a complex formula developed by the State of Minnesota. The levy limit gives us the total amount possible to levy against taxpayers. One of the factors in the levy limit formula is the Local Government Aid we receive. As you may recall from discussions in June when our local legislators and Finance Director, John Norman, were present, it is projected that the City of Mound's LGA for 1989 will increase $154,500. LGA received is a subtraction on the levy limit formula. Therefore, it is likely that our levy limit for 1989 will be less that 1988's. It is difficult to precisely figure what our levy limit 1989 BUDGET MEMO TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL AUGUST 4, 1988 will be for 1989 because this information is certified to us sometime in mid to late August by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. If this seems to be difficult to understand, you can thank the Minnesota State Legislature for their work during the last legislative session. * The mill rate system as we know it has been eliminated and been replaced with "tax capacity rates" starting in 1989. SIGNIFICANT EXPENDITURES THAT WERE NOT BUDGETED IN 1988 There were a number of expenditures that were approved by the City Council following the adoption of the 1988 budget in the fall of 1987. They are listed as follows: Comparable Worth Adjustments Less Contingency Amount Budgeted Subtotal Team Building/Goal Setting Sessions Contract for Eco. Development Sessions Less Contributions from NSP & Contel Subtotal $49,982 ,20,00O $29,982 3,240 3,375 .-2,000 4,615 Back Licensing for LMCD Est. Costs for Sale of Westedge Property Norwood Lane Improvements Est. Costs for Engineering Norwood Lane Imp. Follow-up Session on Goal Setting (October '88) Subtotal $ 1,870 8,000 9,000 2,000 $21 ,570 TOTAL $56,167 SUMMARY Approved 1988 Budget General Fund Expenditures $2,128,550 Additional Significant Expenditures Approved by City Council Since Adoption' of 1988 Budget 56,167 TOTAL $2,1 84,717 1989 BUDGET MEMO TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 4, 1988 PAGE 3 POSSIBLE ITEMS FOR 1989 The Council has discussed possible expenditures that would be included in the 1989 budget that have not been previously · .budgeted. For example, you have discussed a quarterly City newsletter. This is estimated to run annually $8,000. In addition, Mayor Smith has proposed an additional $5,000 expenditure for activities for the Drug Task Force. Reinstituting the spring/fall cleanup has also been discussed at an estimated cost of $10,000. Other possible expenditures in 1989 could be the follow-up to the recommendations of the Task Force on City Hall expansion, further economic development program services, continued team building/goal setting sessions, etc. It is difficult to project what costs there might be for recommendtions resulting from the task force on City Hall expansion since their work will not be completed until sometime in 1989. It is also difficult to project if we are going to need any further services on economic development from Business Development Services (BPS) or as a result of recommendations made by BDS in their initial work. CONCLUSION As I indicated to you on July 26th, the staff and myself are very busy at this time in preparing a proposed 1989 budget for your review in September. The process of budgeting began on June 1st. The staff is very much aware of how the Council feels about increasing the costs of operation, while at the same time, maintaining the same level of services. As professional staff persons, we also recognize this as important. The budget that is presented annually to the City Council, is one in which expenditures are realistic ones. The proposed budget has been significantly scrutinized by myself in cooperation with the department head, prior to your review. Hence, what you receive in September is what I believe to be a realistic budget in attempting to maintain the current level' of services as well as any new or special needs that have developed in the past year or years. What we tend to forget is that many of the costs of operating the city government are ones that we do not have much control over. Federal and State governments continually mandate legislation to cities without providing any funding for those mandates. The decisions that have to be made with regard to those mandates are really out of local control. Essentially, you have to provide the money somewhere so that the mandates can be carried out and the City is in compliance with the law. 1989 BUDGET MEMO TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 4, 1988 PAGE 4 As I have stated before, in order to maintain the current level of services, the operating monies must be available. Each year costs increase in order for the City to continue the current level of services. It is difficult to establish a certain percentage on what those costs are going to be. It is my belief that if you are going attempt to maintain the current level of city services, you will allow me the flexibility to present a budget that will realistically accomplish this goal. ES:ls RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING GOALS FOR CITY MANAGER ON DEVELOPING 1989 BUDGET REQUESTS WHEREAS, unforseen events may require spending increases the Mound City Council desires to establish as a goal that the City Manager achieve a budget in 1989; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Manager's goal in preparation of the 1989 City budget shall be: 1. Maintenance of City services. 2. a. 1989 overall spending requests shall not exceed proposed 1989 revenues based on current mill rates. b. 1989 overall spending be held at or below a 3% increase over 1988 actual expenditures. 3. Fund the following: a. $4,800 for quarterly City report. b. $5,000 earmarked' for programs or costs recommended by Task Force on Drugs, as approved by the City Council. ~.gSOnl~TO~ N0. 88- August 9, 1988 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the making of street improvements on Shoreline Blvd. (Hennepin County Road 15), between Commerce Blvd. (Hennepin County Road 110) and the Mound City limits at the Seton Channel by the construction of curb and gutter, concrete driveway aprons, sidewalk and storm sewer and the contract price for such improvement is $175,148.00, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such im- provement amount to $52,961.00 so that the total cost of'the im- provements will be $228,109.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of nne.o a by the City is hereby declared to be ~ and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual install- ments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first. Monday in January, 1989, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adop- tion of the assessment resolution. The City Clerk, .with the assistance of the City Con- sulting Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. .' The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and .seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Attest: City Clerk Mayor 1 August 9, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88- RESOLUTION DECLARIN~ COST TO BE ~SSESSED AND ORDERIN~ PREPARATION OF PROPOSED WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the making of im- provements on Shoreline Blvd. (Henn~pin County Road 15), between Commerce Blvd. (Hennepin County Road 110) and the Mound City limits at the Seton Channel by the addition of street lights and ~the contract price for such improvement is $133,713.00, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such im- provement amount to $37,701.00 so that the total cost of the im- provements will be $171,414.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The portion of the cost of such improvement to be pai~ by the City is hereby declared to be $85,707.00 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $85,707.00. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual install- ments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1989, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from the date of the adop- tion of the assessment resolution. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Con- sulting Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the council thereof. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Attest: City Clerk Mayor 1 August 9, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88- ~ RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES AS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS SEPTEMBER 13, 1988 & NO~EMBER 8, 1988 BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the following list of elec- tion judges for the Primary Election September 13, 1988, and the .General Election November 8, 1988: Adams, Lavonne Anderson, Gunhild Anderson, Lisa Aspinwall McGill, Pam Bitney, Ann Blood, Cheri Bostrom, Holly Brandenburg, Emma Brewer, Gerri Burlingame, Chris Byrnes, Robert Carlson, Robert Champine, Joanne Charon, Karol "Pinky" Cherrey, Glenda Cooper, Leatrice Corl, Charon Davidson, Marion Dressel, Elsie Gauvin, Theresa Gearther, Valerie Gierman, Janet Gilbertson, Marian Gilmore, Arlene Gunderson, Thelma Gustafson, Eric Hall, Marcy Heitz, Joan Jackson, Gladys Jerdee, Virginia Johnson, Betty Johnson, Jeanette Kelley, David Kempf, Jane Koenig, Edythe Lansing, Be~y Lassek,Karen Lister, Bernard Maas, Delores Martin, Alice Mason, Joanne Matson, Joyce Maxwell, Helen Mazoleny, L. Fernando Meier, Sharon Meisel, Pat Messick, June Mondloh, Lee Nelson, Joyce O'Brien, Dorothy 01son, Jeanne 0man, Kathy Orn, Phyllis Oslund, Adelma Pearson, Margaret Phleger, Shirley Psyck, Irma Putt, Bernice Richter, Ella Robinson, Jean Rogers, Charlotte Romness, Shirley Rudolph, Phyllis Scholer, Ellen Schwingler, Allen Schwingler, Ann Sheridan, M. Kathleen Skoglund, Ardelle Smith, Ruth Sprow, Lemuel Strong, Betty Strong, Linda Swanson, Frances Todd, Maybelle Todd, Ralph Webb, Sharon Williamson, Bruce Wilsey, Sandra Wilson, Clifford Woytcke, Sandra August 5, 1988 City Of Mound City Council Steve Smith Dear Sirs, In 7976 I purchased my home at 6557 Bartlett Blvd., from Mr. Frommes and the David C. Bell Realty Co. When I purchased the home I was told it was on City sewer and water. In the winter of 1984 (approx. March) my sewer started backing up into my basement bathroom. We had Rooto-Rooter out to unclog it. There equipment kept getting stuck'after going to far and could not figure out what was going on and needed to know where the sewer came into the house. We went to the city and got a drawing of the installation of the sewer system. To my amazement I found out that there was a "sub station" for lack of better terms, on my land. I had no knowledge of this now or was I told of this when I purchased the house.. Nor was there anything in the realty papers on this. We had some of the city maintenance men come out with metal detectors to help us find the holding tank cover. After some looking and poking they found it and I still could not believe that I had lived here for over 8 years and was never told or notified about this. After asking many questions I found out through several people that the city did not want to dig the sewer line deep enough to accommodate this.ho'use so they suggested that the Frommes put a holding tank and pump in to push the sewage out to the road. The FroMmes and the Widmer Co. then installed the system with the approval of the city who inspected the work and approved the system. We' have been told by the people who did the repair of they pump system in 1984 and again in 1985 that the system that was originally put in was not adequate nor would it ever be adequate for the distant in which the sewage needed to be pumped. In fact he had his wagon right up by the'house and he said that it was even hard for his pump which is much bigger to pump out the holding tank. He said that it was a fluke that the first pump put in when the sewer was hooked up lasted so long. Page 2 I feel that it was and still is the responsibility of the city to take care of this. The sewer should have either been dug low enough to handle my hook up or the city sould have put in the right kind of system to handle the pumping of my sewage to the street. It has cost me on an average for over the last three years 600.00 dollars for repair plus the charges of the city to keep me free of sewage in my house and now it will cost me another $1200.00 to fix it again. Yes thats right this week the pump has gone out again. I have asked the city several times for assistance in this matter as I feel they should take some responsibility in this as it was originally there suggestion that this be done. This evidentally was done to save them some work. Once again I ask that this be corrected and that the proper system be installed and maintained bY the city as it is on ther properties. Sincerely, Mic~eal Malaske May 18, 1988 CITS:' of ,'X,IOUND TO: FRCM: RE: Yd. YOR AND CiTY COUNCZL ~.~ ~. ED SHUKLE, CiTY MANAGE.=, MICHAEL J. MALASKE, 6557 BARTLETT BOULEVARD A~ .ched you w~l~ ~'.'nd a letter da~ed ~.y 6, 198~ ~rom Mayor Steve Smith to myself regarding questions ct. a lift station located on private property at 65.=7 Martlett Blvd. C ..ad contac=ed Jon El.m, sty nag.r, in February 198.=, regarding repair to the .lift station on his property. Mr. E_,~m' - to~c' ' him th~-t- the City of Mound hmd provided the s=aUion years ago and the l~ft station itself w~s installed by.a private contractor and it was up =o =he prlva~e homecw.ner to maintain the station. In 1986, Mr. Malaske contacted me reg=rd ng the same issue, i responded zn the ~:me w:y that Mr. E~am had done, by letter d=ted Augus~ 7, 1986 Both Mr. Elam's and my !eUter are attached. ~ · I have ver~,ied~ the City's role [n th~._ i-sue, by contacting Leonard Kopp, City Manag~g~etween 1960-~981. Leonard indicated Mound, as far as our records indicate, has never paid for any repairs to these private lift stations. For your informa=ion, the City cf Mour.d has 29 lift stations, wh~cn =*~ City owned =nd ooe-=ted. The ~_ty h~ easements on private property for these s=atlons. The lO privmte stations are not included within the 29. If you have any questions, please contact me. ..&~lncer ely,, , / /,,, I/ ,./, I,. .4 I: Edward 'J.! Shuk!e, Jr. C~ '"; cc: Mr. Ma!aske ~,~as ~. .~lcGmre S~even C. Srn~ SMITH · FISHER ATTORNEYS .iT LAW May 6, 1988 N,iarket Plaza "~'"t.. West 66th Street Richfield. Minnesota 55423 (612) 861-1556 Mr. Ed Schukie Ciu-=, Manager Mound City Hall 5241 Maywcod Road Re: Michael J. Malaske 6557 Baru!eut Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 472-4776 Dear Ed: Mr. Ma!ske has contacted me with several quesuicns, and I would ask that you refer these, perhaps, to Jan Bertrand and, if she would be so kind as to report back by the council meeting scheduled for May 24, 1988. I will be happy to notify Mr. Ma!ske that he can appear at that time if he has further questions. I think the questions tha~ he has raised concerning his particular situation may have impact or be of interes~ relative to anyone's similar situation. Thank you for your help. Mr. Ma!ske's home at 6557 Bartlett Boulevard is situated below the City's sewer line. Therefore, he needs and has a sump pump or a lift station located on his proper~y. A couple of years ago the pump went out and he was required to replace it at his own expense. He was under the impression that it was a City expense. How ~aany such.~umus. ~,~" ~ ~=' o-aticns"~ ~xist in the City cf Mcund? Afuer searching the records or within Jan's memory in the recent past, ten years or so, has Mound ever paid for the repair of or repaired direcu!y any such pumps or stations? S~eve Ssi SCS:nn C CC: '.~ -' .._~nael ~. Malaske August 7, 1986 CITY of MOUND Mr. Mike Malaske 6557 Bartlett Blvd. Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Mr. Ma!aske: This will confirm my conversation with Mr. Connolly today that all repairs on 'private sewer lines are the responsibility of the homeowner. /,,-'~,,,,.ncerely,., / ~ // Edward J.iTShukle, Jr.~ City Manager EJ$:fc BILLS ..... AUGUST 9, 1988 BATCH 8073 Batch 8074 59,856.94 105,739.10 Donald Bryce Unitog Loren Kohnen Fran Clark Advance for Conf July uniform rent July inspections Election expenses 2,000.00 239.33 1,704.25 28.96 Total Bills 169,568.58 PAGE I APoC02-O1 PURCHASE CITY OF M[~JND JOURNAL VENDOR INVOICE DLE HOLD NQ. INVOICE ~MBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT [ESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER PFC-PAID AMOUNT A0398 PRE-PAID 218.00 NC CITY MGR CONF 01-4040-4110 ?/29/88 7/29/88 218.00 JRNL-CD 1010 21b.vO A~ MR. FDSIER VENDOR TOTAL 218.00 PRE-PAID 7/29/88 1,563.28 LIQ 1,563.28 JR~.-CD 71-7100-9510 I010 1563.~ BELLBOY CORPDRATION VENDOR TOTAL 1563.28 PRE-PAID 7/29/88 7/29/88 1,496.40 GASOLINE 1,496.40 01-1250-0000 1010 14%.40 BILL CLARK OIL COMPANY VENDO~ TOTAL 1496.40 C0888 PRE-PAID 2,426.00 7/23 DED CR UNIDN 01-2040-0000 7/29/88 7/29/88 2,426.00 ~-CD 1010 2426,00 CITY COUNTY CREI)IT bl4IDN VENDDR TOTAL 2426.00 C0920 PRE-PAID 11.69 1.67 2,00 3.40 10.60 .81 9.66 7.20 6.26 8.15 10.00 .50 8.25 7/29/88 7/29/88 80.19 RETIREMENT P/C POSTAGE P/C POSTAGE P/C POSTAGE P/C MAIL BAG P/C POSTAGE P/C POSTAGE P/C POSTAGE P/C POSTAGE P/C POSTAGE P/C GASOLINE P/C SURCHARGE G PRIql' 1024 P/C CAB CARD P/C 01-4020-2:200 01-4190-3210 01-4320-3210 01-4090-3210 01-4320-3210 81-4350-3210 73-7300-3210 01-4040-3210 78-7B00-3210 01-4280-3210 22-4170-2210 01-2222-0000 01-4140-4140 1010 80.19 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR TOTAL 80.19 C0%0 PP£-PAID 7/29/88 7/29/88 9.97 12.47 24.16 5.25 94.29 30.42 20.63 26.~ 9.99 13.92 2.48 6.97 JJNE SUPPLIES JUNESUI:I:LIES JUNE SUPPLIES JUNE SUPPL'IES ~ SUPPLIES JUNE StJPPLIES JUNE SUPPLIES JUNE SUPPLIES JUNE SUPPLIES JUNE SUPPLIES JUNE SUPPLIES JUNE SUPPLIES J~NL-CD 73-7300-2200 73-7300-2300 78-7800-2200 78-7800-2300 01-4340-2200 01-4340-2300 01-4340-2330 01-4320-2200 01-4~o0-~,~0 01-4290-2200 0i-4140-2200 22-4170-~)0 1010 COAST TO COAST VENDOR TOTAL 256.83 C0999 F~E-PAID 7129188 7/29/~ 45.90 1.80 47.70 AUG LIFE INS RETIREE LIFE INS JPJI.-CD 01-%*~)40-0000 01-4190-1520 1010 47.70 AP-~02-O1 ~DOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE ~BR DATE DATE STATUS PURCHASE CITY OF, MOL~4D AMOL~T DESCRIPTION JOURNAL ACCOb~fT ~ER PF£-FA!D A~UNT C~M~CI~ LIFE INS CO VENDOR TOTAL 47.70 C1001 PRE-PAID 2,001.13 TAXES-7/i~ PR 7/29/88 7/2?/88 2,001.13 J~I-CD COMMISSIO)ER OF REVENUE VENDOR TOTAL ~01.13 D1219 PRE-PAID 236.25 27 CDNT~CT HOURS 14.~ MILEA~ 7/29/~ 7/29/~ 250.~ dF~.-CD DB..~ERT RLIDOLFI.I VENgDR TOT~ 250.33 D1235 PRE-PAID ~l.6S JULY DENTAL PREM 12.75 RETIREE DENTAL 32.95 RETIREE DENTAL 45.70 ~'TIREE DENTAL 7/29/88 7/2~/88 1,116.00 d~-CI) DELTA DENTAL VENDDR TOTAL 1116.00 D1~9 PRE-PAID 50.00 PERMIT-RAMP REPAIR 7/~/88 7/29/88 50.00 d~.-CD DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 E1429 PRE-PAID 208.85 WINE 2.08- DIS~ 7/29/88 7/~/88 206.77 dRNL-CD [] PHILLIPS & SQNS VENDOR TOTAL 20&.77 Fl72& PRE-PAID 45.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION ~.00 MEMBEIiSHIP 7/2~/88 100.00 dRNL-CI) 7129188 FRESHWATER FDUNDATIDN VENDOR TOTAL PRE-PAID 7129188 7/~/88 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSLRANCE VENDOR TDT~ G1971 PRE-PAID 7/29/88 7/2~/88 GROUP HEALTH PLAN VE~OR TOTAL 81972 PRE-PAID 7129/88 7/~/85 100.00 1,0~.00 DEl= CDMP 7/~ PR 1,023.00 dSt-CD 1023.00 189,30 HOSP INS 189.30 dRNL-CD 189.30 200.00 WINE 52.86 MIX 7.06- DI~ 4.42 FRT ~0.22 dR~-CD 01-20,I.0-0000 1010 81-4350-3100 81-4350-~4O 1010 01-2040-0000 01-4190-1510 01-4280-!510 01-4140-1510 71-7100-1510 1010 81-4350-o5300 1010 71-7100-9520 71-7100-~560 1010 01-4340-4110 01-4340-4130 1010 01-204O-0000- 1010 01-2040-0000 1010 71-7100-~520 71-7100-~40 71-7100-~560 71-7100-96(X) , 1010 2001.13 250.33 1116.00 206.77 100.00 10~.00 350.~ PAGE 3 AP-C02oO1 VENDDR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOI~ NM, BROAllE DATE STATUS GRIGGS COOPER ~ COMPANY VB~OR TOTAL H2145 PRE-PAID 7/29/'-~ 7/29/88 HENN CO SUPPORT b, COLLECT, VE)~)]R TOTAL 171.53 H~YZ52 PRE-PAID 8,137.43 MAY TAX SETTLE]~ENT ?/29/88 ?/29/88 8,137.43 JRNL-CO HOUSING & RE~EVELOPMNT ALF[ VENDDR 'TOTAL 8137.43 ~ PRE-PAID ~99.85 CEMElER¥ MAINT 21.80 CITY HALL MAINT ?/2~/88 ?/29/88 421.65 dR~.-CO HOWARD SIMAR VENDOR TOTAL 421.65 I~O1 PRE-PAID ~.06 DEF COMP ?/23 PR 7/29/8~ 7/29/88 53B.0~ JRNL-CO ICMA RETIREMENT CORP VENDOR TOTAL 538.06 J2571 PRE-PAIl) 577.50 77 CONTRACT HOURS 7/29/88 ?/29/88 577.50 dP, NL-CO JOHN TAFFE VENDOR TOI'AL 577.50 J2579 PRE-PAID 5~.76 LIQ 14~.31 WINE 12.99- OISC 7.50 FRT 7/29/88 7/29/88 723.58 ~IL-CO dOHNSON ~ ~HOL.ESALE LI'~ VE)IDOR TOTAL 723.58 139.07 PARTS 7/29/88 7/29/88 ].73.99 ,.JRI'L-CO LOI~ELL'$ VE]'~OR TOTAL 173.99 M3090 PRE-PAID 726.4~ HOSP INS 7/2?/88 7/2?/88 726.49 dRNL-CO MED CENTER I'EALTH PLAN VE]'~DOR TOTAL 726.49 M3268 PRE-PAID 122.05 MBA INS 7/29/88 7/29/88 122.05 ~NL-CO MN BENEFIT AS~ VEN~DR TDTAL 122.05 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MOUND AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 35O.22 171.53 7/23 DED 171.53 ,JRNL-CD fl~21 PRE-PAID' 20.00 CONVEYANCE FEE-TX FDRFT PROP 7/~/~ 7/29/~ 20.00 d~ltl.-CI) MN DE'PT OF REVENUE VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 ACCOUNT NL~B~ 01-~40-0000 1010 96-9600-4100 1010 80-8000-1300 01-4320-1300 1010 01-2040-0000 1010 01-4340-3100 1010 71-7100-~510 71-7100-9520 71-7100-9560 71-7100-%00 I010 73-7300-2300 01-4290-~10 1010 01-20~0-0000 1010 ' 01-2040-0000 1010 01-4320-4100 1010 PRE-PAID AMOUNT 171.53 8137.43 421.65 538.06 5'r' ~0 7~.58 173.99 726.49 122.05 20.00 P~]E 4 AP-C02-OI VD~DOR INVOIC£ DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS PURCHASE CITY~ ~D AMOUNT £ESCRIPTION JOURNAL ACCOU,~FF NUMBER AMOL~,{T M3401 PRE-PAID 7/29/88 liN RETIREMENT SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL M3520 PRE-PAID 7/29/88 7/2~/88 PRE-PAID 7/"~/88 7/29/88 MDU)~ POSlltASTER VENDDR TOTAL M3631 FI~E-PAID 7/2?/88 7/2~/88 MUTUAL BE?EFIT LIFE 'VENDOR TOTAL N3710 FIlE-PAID 7129188 7129188 NAVARRE HAFU]WA~ VENDOR TOTAL P3950 PRE-PAID 7/29/88 7/~/~ PRE-PAID 7129188' 7129188 P E R A VE}~OR TOTAL 2q)8.00 'DEF COMP 7/L:~3 PR ~.00 JF~IL-CD 288.00 24.35 REPLENISH POSTG M~ 66.35 REPLENISH POSTG MTR 19.40 REPLENI~ POSTG MTR 23.45 REPLENISH POSTG HTR 82.13 REPLBqI~ POSTG MTR 12.~0 ~Pt. ENISH P1]STG ~ 14.00 REPLENISH PI~TG HTR 27.50 RS:q. ENISH P~TG HTR 60.50 REPLENISH POSTG HTR ~.~ RF. PLElqlSH POSTG ~FFR 36.07 REPLENISH POSTG HTR ~.07 RF. Pt. ENISH POSTG ~ 7S.30 REPLENISH POSTG HTR 1.50 REPLENISH P~T8 M~ 29.25 REPLENISH POSTG HTR 9.80 REPLENISH POSTG MTR 5.85 REBt]ENISH POSTG HTR 5.25- REPLENISH POSTG MTR 600.00 dRNL-CD 69.37 Hi~TG F~ WTR BILLS 69.37 P1]STG F~ WTR BIU.S 138.74 dRI'~.-CD 738.74 527.62 527.62 527.62 13.95 2.19 5.78 9.15 18.96 19.20 24.98 94.21 94.21 5,323.23 5,~3.~ 113.29 113.29 5436.52 AUG LTD dRNL-CD CHAIN SPRAYER BAGS BULBS GLOVES ROPEES TUBE JRNL-CD 7/23 PR JRNL-CD PERA RETRO PR dRNL-CD MACHI~ ~CHINE M~HI~ MACHINE 01-2040-0000 1010 288.00 01-4070-3210 01-4020-3210 01-4040-3210 01-4060-3210 01-40~0-3210 22-4170-3210 71-7100-3210 01-43~-3210 B1-4~-3210 01-4190-3210 73-7300-3210 78-7800-3210 01-4140-3210 01-4280-~10 01-4270-~10 01-4-090-3210 01-4030-3210 01-4320-3210 1010 73-7~0-3210 78-78~)0-~10 1010 138.74 01-2040-0000 1010 527.62 01-4280-2310 01-4380-2300 01-4%x~)-2250 78-7800-2200 ' 78-7800-22~0 22-4170-2200 22-4170-2200 1010 94.21 01-2040-0000 1010 01-~40-0000 1010 113.29 PAGE 5 AP-C02-O1 VE]qDOR IN~q]I~ I)LE HOLI) NO. INVOICE NHBR l)ATE ))ATE STATUS P4~30 PRE-PAID PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUNI) AMDUNT [ESCRIPTIDN 5,446.85 7/~ PR DED HOSP 221.62 .RETIREE HOSP INS 104.5S RETIREE HDSP INS 5,773.02 dP, NL-C~ 7/29/~ 7/2?/88 PHYSICIANS OF MN VENDDR TOTAL P4110 PRE-PAID 7/~/88 7/~/88 PRECISION STRIPING VENI]OR TOTAL P4115 PRE-PAIl) 7/29/88 7/29/88 PRUI)ENTIAL INSURANCE COMPA UE)~)OR TOTAL Q4171 PRE-PAIl) 1,059.72 LIQ 65.00 WINE 21.88- l)I$C 7/29/88 7/29/88 1,102.84 ,JRil,-Cl) QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL 1102J84 R4259 PRE-PAIl) 592.00 64 CONTRACT HOURS 97.83 dULY HOSP 7/29/88 7/29/88 689.83 dRNL-Cl) ROBERT E dOl~tSON ~ TOTAL 689.83 84358 PRE-PAIl) 8.00 LUTTERMAN COPIES 7/29/88 7/29/88 8.00 dR)iL-CO SECRETARY OF STATE VENI)OR TOTAL 8.00 84379 PRE-PAIl) 245.62 HOTEL-STRONG-CLERKS ~CHOOL 7/29/88 7/29/88 245.62 ~hERAT~ MIl)WAY-ST PAUL VENI)OR TOTAL 245.62 84500 PRE-PAIl) 9,183.47 TAXES 7/23 PR 7/29/88 7/29/88 9,183.47 ,JPJ~.-CO STATE BAit( OF MOUNI) VENI)OR TOTAL 9183.47 S4511 PRE-PAIl) 418.60 7/23 PR I)8) CR UNION 7/29/88 7/29/88 418.60 dRNL-CI) STATE CAPITOL CREDIT ~ION VENDOR TOTAL 418.60 S4630 PRE-PAIl) 20.12 dUNE GASOLINE 9.50 dUNE G~INE 12.39 d~NE GASOLINE 76.48 dUNE GASSLINE 654.46 dUNE ~INE 5773.02 198.48 CBI) STRIPING 1,766.60 STRIPING 1,965.08 ,J{~I.-CD 1965.~ 77.13 7/23 PR I)EI)-IN~ 77.13 JP, NL-CO 77.13 ACCOUNT NU~ER 01-2040-0000 01-4140-1510 01-4190-1510 1010 40-6000-2360 01-4280-2360 1010 01-2040-0000 1010 71-7100-9510 71-7100-9520 71-7100-9560 1010 01-4340-3100 01-4340-1510 1010 01-4190-4100 1010 01-4040-4110 1010 1010 iOlO 01-4190-2210 01-4040-2210 01-4340-2210 01-4280-2210 01-4140-,'~10 PRE-PAID AMOUNT 5773.02 1965.08 77.13 1102.84 245.62 9183.47 418.60 P~E 6 APoC02-01 INVOICE DUE HOLB INVOICE I~BR DATE DATE STATUS 7/2~/88 ?/29/88 SUPERA~ICA VENDOR TOTAL T4:~,29 P~E-PAID 7/2~/88 TOD9 LI~ ~ TOT~ ~197 P~-PAID 7/~/~ 7/~/~ ~ ~ 5113 ~ TOT~ TOT~ A~ ~ PURCHASE CITY DF MDL~D AMDUNT 116.64 8~9.59 20,~, O0 DESCRIPTION ~)UNE GASOLINE ,.~,NL-CD UNIFDRH ALLOWANCE ~. ,00 JRI&-CD 200.00 9,231.24 9,231.24 9231.24 59,856.94 I~=UND DF ESF~OW JRNL-CI) JOURNAL PF£-PAID ACCDL~T ~EF: AHOUNT 73-7300-2.9.10 1010 01-4140-224.0 1010 20O.00 01-2300-0000 I010 9231.24 PAGE I AP-C02-O1 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY O~ MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT ~ESCRIPTION PRE-PAID ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT CHE A0060 13.78 dULY OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.92 dULY OFFICE SUPPLIES 71.21 ELEC SHARP-ROLODEX-SUPPL 29.75 JLLY OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.78 dULY OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.53 dilLYOFFICE SUPPLIES 5.39 dULY OFFICE 9JPPLIES 8.08 ,lILYOFFICE SUPPLIES 10.77 dULY OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.69 JLLY OFFICE SUPPLIES 70.80 II~EXES-BINI)ERS 24~.70 JRNL-CD 01-4044-2100 O1-4(Y'yO-21OO 01-4140-2100 01-4190-2100 01-4340-2100 01-4280-2100 71-7100-2100 73-7300-2100 75-7800-2100 01-4270-2100 01-4020-2100 1010 ACRO-MN VENDOR TOTAL 24~.70 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 68.28 dULY CONTRACT 20.45 dULY CONTRACT 9.45 dULY COf[RACT 4.68 dULY CONTRACT 24.30 dULY COtf[RACT 4,69 dULY CONTRACT 14.85 duLY CONTRACT 9.45 ,JULY CONTRACT 14.85 JULY CONTRACT 171.OO 01-4280-3950 01-4340-3950 01-4190-39,50 01-4290-3950 01-4140-3950 01-4040-3950 73-7300-3950 78-7800-3950 22-4170-3950 1010 AIR COMM INC ~tl~OR TOTAL 171.00 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 49.45 XEROX PAPER 49.45 ,JR]i.-C]) 01-4320-21OO 1010 ANCHOR PAPER VENDOR TOTAL 49.45 A0371 8/04/88 8/O4/88 230.50 CONCRETE 230.50 JRNL-CD 01-4340-5000 1010 APPLE VALLEY READY MIX VENIX]R TOTAL 230.50 B0660 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 211.61 MISC SCREI~,BOLTS,ETC 211.61 01-4290-2310 1010 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION VENIX~ TOTAL 211.61 ~730 8/04/88 8/04/~ 172.94 JULY 172.94 JR~-CO 01-4280-2340 1010 ~YAH ROCK PROIAJCTS VEND~ TOTAL 172.94 COg40 8/O4/88 8/04/~ 20.24 ,JULY RUG RENT 20.24 duLY RUG RENT 40.48 01-4320-4210 71-7100-4210 I010 CLEAN STEP RENTAL TOTAL 40,48 C0970 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 ~8.55 JULY MIX ~8.55 dRNL-CD 71-71OO-9540 1010 PAG£ 2 AP-C02-OI VENDOR INVOICE DL~E HOLD NO. I~'OICE ~R ~T~ I)~T~ ~T~TU~ PUP, CHASE CITY OF MOLhXD JOURNAL AMOUNT DE~IDTI~ A~COUNT II!M~R PRE-PAID ~MOUNT COCA C[~ BOTTLING-MIDWEST VENDOR TOTAL CIOIO 81O4188 81O4188 COMMUNICATION AUDITOR VEI',E~]R TOTAL CLIO1 COTTER CHARGE CARD 8/04/88 8/04/88 VEN[~ TOTAL 8/04/88 8/04/88 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT D1200 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO D1240 DEPENDABLE SERVICES D1320 DONALD BRYCE E1420 EAST SIDE BB~ERAGE E1430 ~RD SHLIKJ.E F1530 FEED RITE CONTROLS F1690 FOUR STAR MR SUPPLY Fl700 ~ TOTAL 8/04/~ 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/O4/88 ~E]'~OR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENI~ TOTAL 8/04/88 8/O4/,9>8 VElaR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/04/88 VEl,ri)OR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/04/88 V~ TOTAL 258.~ 76.41 PADER REPAIR ~-4170-3200 76.41 JRNL-CD 1010 76.41 59.40 STAKES-LATH 01-4270-~00 59.40 ,.~i~-CD 1010 59.40 477.16 ~'TE~S 73-7300-2L'~X) 477.16 JRNL-CD 1010 4~.16 4,347.00 dULY BEER 71-7100-9530 4,347.00 JBNL-CD 1010 434%00 47.00 dULY GARBAGE 01-4320-3750 47.00 JRNL-CD 1010 47.00 =__ 41%00 JULY CHIEF PAY 22-4170-1370 417.00 dRNL-CD 1010 417.00 5,774.21 JULY BEER 71-7100-9530 5,774.21 JRNL-CD 1010 57~4.21 21.72 MTG EXP 01-4040-4120 21.72 JRNL-CD 1010 21.72 216.73 FLUORIDE 73-7300-22E~ 216.73 dRNL-CD 1010 216.73 42.06 dULY MIX 71-7100-~-~) 169.32 JULY MISC 71-7100-9550 211.~ JR,-CD 1010 211.38 60.42 SPRAY PAINT 73-7300-~00 30.21 SPRAY PAINT 78-78~0-~00 PGE 3 AP-C02-01 VENDOR ND. INVOICE N)q, BR FOX VAi!FY SYSTEltS F1711 FRANCKS TRUCKING G1761 CONSULTANTS 1NC G1870 GERALD BABB ~120 Ih~'DICE DUE HOIn DATE DATE STATUS 8/04/88 8/04/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/04/F~ VENI)Q~ TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/04/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 HENN CD I)EPT DF PROF1ERTY T VENDOR TOTAL ~160 ~ CO TRE~ J2500 JANET BERTRAND J2~O JD~( HENRY FOSTER J600 JDYCE NELSON L2769 LAKE MA~&qC, EHENT INC L2PJO LEAGUE DF ~ CITIES L.%'~30 81O4188 81O4188 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 ~ TOTAL 81O4188 81O4188 VENDOR TDTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 81O4188 81O4188 VEI'~OR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VE}E)DR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITYOFM~D A,~iOUNTDESCRIPTI~ ACCOUNT NUME. ER 90.63 JRNI.-CD 1010 90.63 164.40 dULY FRT 71-7100-9600 164.40 dBNL-CD 1010 164,40 562.40 TEST FOR BA~I(FIII-PW BI_DG ~-60(0)-3100 562.40 JR~-CD 1010 562.40 208.33 dULY MARSHALL PAY 22-4170-1370 208.33 JRb~.-CD 1010 208.33 74.98 VR LABELS 01-40b0-~'"00 74.~ JRNL-CD 1010 74.98 1,022.00 ~ PRISONER BOARI) 01-4110-4~ 1,022.00 dRNL-CI) 1010 1022.00 ="-- 17.10 MTO EXP 01-4190-4120 17.10 dRNL-CO 1010 17,10 243.38 COPPRESSOR 78-7800-2300 243.38 JRNL-CD I010 243.38 8.80 RECYCLE MTG 01-4270-4120 8.80 JPJI.-CD 1010 8.80 708.00 BEACHES-WEED CONTROL 01-4340-3800 708.00 dR){.-CD 1010 708.00 4,420.00 88-89 DUES 01-4020-41~ 4,420.00 JRhL-CD 1010 445.$9 JULY PARTS 01-4,290-2310 445.89 JRNL-CD 1010 PRE-PAID A~U~ PAGE 4 AP-g02-O1 VE]IDOE IN'vq]ICE [L'E HOLD NO. INVOICE h,~iBR DATE DATE STATUS PURCHASE CITY OF MOL~D AMOUNT DESCRIPTION dOURNAL ACCOU~ NL~ER PRE-PAID AMOUNT LB, FJ.L'S ~980 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC M3010 8104188 MARINA AUTO SUPPLY )~I3030 VENI}ORTOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/O4/88 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR VIEI{DDR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/04/88 METRO FONE ~ICATIONS VENDOR TOTAL M3170 8/04/88 B/O4/88 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMI* VENDOR TDTAL M3470 8104188 81041,98 MN VALLEY TESTING LABDRATO VE)(DOR TOTAL 445.8? ~.71 SPRING 33.71 dR)i-CD 95.84 BATTERY 1~0.01 ~tll. Y PARTS 215.85 JRII.-CD 215.85 10,845.35 JULY BEER 10,845.35 dBNL-CD 10845.35 42.80 42.80 42.80 ~,736.17 7,719.84- 753.32- ~,2~.01 25263.01 37.40 37.40 37.40 M3490 378.00 6,144.50 I 560.50 8/04/88 8/04/88 8,083.00 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT VENDOR TOTAL 8083.00 M'~O0 4,428.~ 8/04/88 8/04/88 4,4~.92 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSN VENDOR TOTAL 4428.~ 8/04/~ 8/O4/88 V~,E)OR TOTAL M3570 ~PLS STAR & TRIBUNE ~610 8/04/88 8/04/88 215.64 215.64 215.&4 178.02 178.02 PAGER P~T ~hL-CD AUG SEWER SERVICE AUG SEW~ SERVICE AUG SEWE~ SERVICE ~-CD WATER ANALYSIS ~00 BRIGHTON-BLIGHTED H~ JUt. Y ~LARIES ~LY MAINT JbLY DRILLS JRNL-CD AUG FIRE RELIEF PENSIGN JRNL -CD HF_LP WTl) AD JRI~.-CD REPAIR WI)E COOLiSt ~ -CD 01-4280-2310 1010 22-4170-2200 01-4%'x)0-2310 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 01-4140-395~ 1010 78-7800-4~ 78-11~-0000 9OlO 73-73oo-31oo iOlO 16-S895-3100 22-4170-1390 22-4170-31~0 22-4170-1380 1010 95-9500-1400 1010 01-4190-4100 1010 71-7100-8830 1010 ),%? ') PAGE 5 AP-C02-O1 UENI~3R INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DA~ DATE STATUS PURCHASE CITY DF MOb,~ AMO~F[ DESCRIPTION JOURNAL ACCOUNT NU~.ER P~-PAII) A~JlJNT IIT~A RE)--RIOERATI~ VEI.~D(~q TOTAL ~680 8/04/88 8/04/88 NATl. FIPdE PFU]~CTIDN ASSN VE~DR TOTAL N3719 kEENAH FOUNDRY CD N3790 NDRTHER~ HYDRAULICS P4000 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/04/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/O4/88 PEPSI CDLA/7UP BOI'II. ING VENDOR TOTAL P4,060 81O4188 81O4188 ~A DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL P4090 8/04/88 8/04/88 POWER BRAKE EQUIPMENT CD VENDOR TOTAL P4095 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 PRACTICAL ~ CDNCE~TS VENDOR TOTAL ~171 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 QUALITY WIG & SPIRITS VE~4I~]R TOTAL R4240 8/04/88 8/04/88 REO-RAJ KENN1ELS VE-ND~ TOTAL 178.02 62.70 F'P,E~,ENI'IDN IqAT~I~S 62.70 ,JP, NL-CD 62.70 83.00 39.~ SWING AWAY 27.17 TOOLS 67.16 dRNL-CI) 67.16 274.70 ,.U..Y MIX 274.70 JRNL-CD 274.70 3,689.05 3,689.05 106.5.3 106.53 106.53 142.50 142.50 142.50 715.00 715.00 715.00 JULY BEER JPdt-CD VAC ,JR~-CD EVAL DF PERFOI:U'~ EVAL OF PERFORMNC O:U-E.-CD ,,..LILY BEER J~NL-CD 5-6 KENI~I. FEES JRNL-CD ??-4170-2280 I010 01-42!~'0-~00 1010 78-7800-2300 01-4290-2200 1010 71-7100-~540 1010 71-7100-f~o30 1010 OI-4~E~)-~lO 1010 01-4140-4110 73-73~X)-4110 78-7800-4110 01-4280-4110 01-4340-4110 01-40~0-4110 01-4190-4110 01-4040-4110 71-7100-4110 1010 ' 71-71~-9530 I010 01-4140-4270 1010 PAGE 6 AP-C02-O1 INVOICE DUE HOLD ND. INVDICE N)qI~R DATE DATE STATUS PURCHASE CITY DF MDL,"'ID JDURNAL AMDUNT £ESCRIPTION ACCDUNT NUI'IDER PRE-PAI{~ AMOUNT R4280 RDNALD MARSCHKE R4290 RDN'S ICE CDMPANY R4310 8/04/98 V~4I)ER TDTAL 8/04/88 8/O4/88 VENI)OR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 ROYAL ORDWN BEVERAGE S4357 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 SENIDR CDIiMUNITY SERVICES S4370 5443O SDS PRINTING S4450 ST BONI FAR~ STORE S4600 STFUEIC)-~'S S4.62~ SUPERIOR PRODUCTS S4640 SUPER CYCLE V~ TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TDTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VEI, E~ TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/8.9 VENDOR TOTAL 8/04/88' 8/04/88 VE)IDOR TOTAL 150.00 'dULY ASST CHIEF PAY 22-4170-1370 150.00 J~-~D 1010 150,00 717.27 JULY ICE 71-7100-9540 717.27 dRNL-CD 1010 717.27 40.01 JULY MIX 71-7100-9540 40.01 JRNL-CD 1010 40.01 24.95 SERVICE A/C-BDDSTER 73-7300-4200 24.~ dPJ4.-CO I010 24.95 1,443,75 2ND QTR 1~)8 ~ 16-5,?"o5-3100 1,443.75 J{~'J.-CD 1010 1443.75 68.85 ~-10-11 HDSP-KDPP 01-4040-I~10 dm_-CD 9olo 68.85 35.75 ENVELOPES 22-4170-3500 35.75 ~NL-CD 1010 S79.00 AIR CDNI)ITI(~ER 73-7300-5000 579.00 JP~-CD 1010 579.00 116.00 LAI'P-LENS-BAI'[ 01-2300-0~"~0 116.00 dUi{.-CD 1010 116.00 88.00 )-lAND TRUCK 71-7100-2200 88.00 d~-cg I010 88.00 1,430.00 JU~ ~CYCLE SERV 01-4270-4200 1,4~.00 J~-CD 1010 1430.00 PAGE 7 AP-C02-O1 VB~DOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NM~R DATE DATE STATUS T4715 TE~P CENI'ER, INC T4730 THE LAKER T4T70 8/o4/m 8/04/88 VE~OR TOTAL 8/04/88 8/04/88 VENI)OR TOTAL 8104/88 8104/88 THORPE DISTRII)UTINO CD VENDOR TOTAL T4780 81O4188 81O4188 THRIFTY 5NYOER DRUG NO4 VENOOR TOTAL T49~ 81O4188 81O4188 TRI-STATE PL~ & CONTROL I VENOOR TOTAL T4980 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 ~IN CITY HO~ JUICE CO VENIX]R TOTAL U5070 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 UNITEO BL{SIK~5S MACHI[~S VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VERNCO MAINTENANCE INC VEHOOR TOTAL k5630 WIDMER IH 8/O4/88 8/04/88 VE)~q)OR TOTAL Wb'700 S/04/~ 8/O4/88 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MDUND AMOUNT [£SCRIPTION 1,136.00 TEYP HELP 1,136.00 JRNL-CD 1136.00 95.10 HELP W'FD AD 95.10 JRNL-CD 95.10 JULY JRItL-CO 12699.75 2.12 CARDS 2.12 ~M.-CO 2.12 1,145.43 REPAIR PUMP 1,145.43 ,JRNL-CO 1145.43 84.80 dULY MIX 9.34 TYPEWRITER COVER 9.34 JR]i.-CO 645.50 JLLY ~INT 645.50 JRNL-CD 645.50 131.25 5444 TOI~',ANOOO 131.25 5444 TOI~O 210.00 CAROINALLN 472.50 JRNL-CO 472,50 1,550.00 AUG lt'TAINE~ 3,777.15 2 QTR LEGAL ~ 150.00 2 QTR-CO 15 100.00 2 QTR-COBBLESTN ESCI~ 325.00 2 QTR-SETON PL ESCRO~ 1,925.35 2 QTR-HAZARI~ PROPERTY 125.00 2 QTR-COBG-3026 ~IGHTON 657.50 2 QTR-P~ ~ 8,610.00 JF~tL-CD ACCOUNT NL~E~ 01-4190-1300 1010 01-4190-4100 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 22-4170-2200 1010 78-7800-420O 1010 71-7100-~,..40 1010 01-4280-2100 1010 01-4~,X)-4210 1010 73-7300-42tX) - 78-7800-4200 73-7300-3800 1010 ' 01-4110-3100 01-4110-3100 66-6(X)0-3100 01-2300-0962 01-2300-0%1 01-1190-0000 16-5895-3100 60-6000-3100 1010 P~-PAID A~OUNT PAOE 8 AP-C02-O1 INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE N~R DATE DATE STATUS PURCHASE Clll DF ~L~ID AMOUNT DESCRIPTION JOURNAL PiCE-PAID A~DUNT WURST -F'EAR~-L~d~SON X57~ X~OX ~RPt]RATION Z5850 ZACK'S INC Z6129 LARRY CABLE TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/04/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O4/88 8/O4/88 ~qE]qI~]R TOTAL TOTAL ALL ~ 8610.00 152,26 FI~INC-56~ 18.21 INT-5&O0 47.58 ~INC-1012 9,19 I~-1012 227.24 JI~L-CD 227.24 48.250. EANI~ ~IES 48.25 dR.-CD 48.25 50,00 REF~ OF VARI~CE FEE 50.00 JR~-CD 105,7~. I0 01-432~)-5000 01-4320-6110 01-4~'~20-5000 01-43~21)-6110 1010 01-4~ 1010 01-~I0-~ 1010 TO: City Manager, MemDers of the City Council and Staff FROM: Jan BertranO, BuilOing Official ~ SUBJECT: July 1988 Monthly Report During the month of July, we had 20 working Oays. The Inspection/ Planning Department has had 2 Planning Commission meetings on July litn and 25th. [ have attended a PuOlic Facilities Task Force meeting on July 21st, There was one holt clay in July anO I took two scheOuled vacation Oays Outing the month. Ed an~ I reviewed over ?0 resumes For the Planning/Inspection Department secretarial position, with six interviews. A new secretary, Peggy James, was hired, and will start work at the City on August 8th. Time has Oeen spent training a Ten~3 Center employee, 5ua KreDs, during the month. The Following inspections were conducted during the month of July: * Site Inspections Z7 Footing Inspections 9 Framing Inspections 5 ln'sulation Inspections Drywall Inspections 4 II Final Inspections 11 Progress Inspections 3 Erosion/Grading Inspections House Moving/Demolition Z Heating Inspections 3 P'lumbing Inspections 5 Fire Sprinklers/Fire Code Z Complaints Total 92 r This list o~ inspections Odes not incluOe ~4 inspec=lons conOucted by the substitute inspector and seven plan reviews to assist the Planning Inspection Department during the month. The monthly report for June was submitted to the City Manager as well as normal correspondence, inspection notices and reports to the Planning and Zoning Commission. There were 5 residential plan reviews completed during July. The Planning Commission meetings in July reviewed two variance requests. The Planning Commission reviewed the land use section of the comprehensive plan as well as a joint meeting with the Council on the Housing Maintenance Code. During July, I had several phone conference calls with the city prosecutor to discuss the status of several pending court cases. One citation and one warning tag was issued during the month of July. The fire department during July has burned three houses that were under condemnation orders. I met with several builders to discuss future construction projects during the month. The city engineer and myself met with the project manager, developer, and engineer for a tentative development off of Three Points on Lafayette Road, as well as four site inspections during July. I attended the regular staff meeting, as well as the special meeting to discuss performance evaluation reports completed Dy the staff each year. The League of Minnesota Cities General Legislation Committee Meeting was at mid-day, which discussed the pending 1988 legislation year ahead. There were speakers from the Department of Labor Relations, as well as from the Human Services Department, who addressed the comparable worth present legislation and clarification in new legislation that will be brought up to the legislature this year. We were given handout material for the League of Minnesota Cities' position on the upcoming legislation. The city vehicle required the normal gasoline fills during July. The total number of building permits issued in July was 30, with a valuation of $419,496.00. The valuation figures are attached and the building activity report for July is also attached. In addition, Sue did prepare the monthly calendar for August city meetings and events. She has arranged appointments for the inspections of buildings, plumbing, and the substitute inspector. She did prepare the Planning Commission agenda for July 25th meeting, and has written the minutes. July 1988 Monthly Report August 3, 1988- Page 3 ' Site inspections tncluOe the review of the Planning Commission requests and requirements, site Inspections for flood plain verification, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance notices, review status of various sites for the city prosecutor, preconstructton meetings at the site for butlding permit applicants or realtors, fire damage and periodic commercial Inspection updates. ** The nearing inspections during the construction of a project are included under the framing and final inspection of the mufiOing. The heating installations mentioned are for separate equipment being placed in homes and businesses. NOTE= WHEN YOU'RE IN TOO MUCH OF A RUSH, YOU'RE LIABLE TO PASS MORE THAN YOU CATCH UP WITH. - Barry Father JB/sk CITY OF HOUND Hound, MN. NEW RE$1DE~ ' COHSTRU~TIO~ (Fmm~ BUll. DING ACTIVI'I:Y Tmm~ea~ L~ Tot~f RESIDENTIAL &DDITIGN$ w~ 1OTA~ MOHTH AND YEaR TO D~TE DE~OL~OH~ COLLE~IONS T~e ~ Fences ~-~/Nechani TOTAL 343,695. 75,801. 419,496. 1,623,507. ~00,000. 616,000. 820,064. 432,214. 3,491.785. 14A~OP. PERMrT ~ OVIrR $100 ~...~ (612)472-1155 Jan Bertrand 53zi M,t-,YV/OOD ROAB MOUND MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 .August 3, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER '.~'""~ JULY 1988 MONTHLY REPORT I mentioned to you in last month's report that we had a record breaking month of $93,816. Well, records are meant to be broken. In this case, I am pleased to report, that the record was smashed. For the first time your Liquor Store went over the hundred thousand dollar mark doing an impressive $102,747 for the month of July. This surpasses June of 1988 by $8,931, and it surpasses July of last year by $15,269. We had 734 more customers this month than we did in July of 1987. To date this year, we are ahead of last year's pace by $56,699. We seem going in the right direction when other stores have not been so fortunate. The only unfortunate aspect of the business lately has been the amount of part-time help I have been going through. It seems that this new generations concept of what is required of a job is miles apart from what I was taught to believe. I get employees who work for a month or two and then quit because they had some misconception that the job was going to be a piece of cake. I know I have my rules and regulations, and some may consider me strict as a boss, but I am not overbearing. I do not believe that is why some of them leave. I am convinced that there is a "work ethic gap" between my generation and the next one coming .up. So this may, or may not be, an appropriate time to let you know tr. at for the '89 budget, I will be asking for an additional $2000 more for temporary help than was budgeted for this year. Now that the P.E.R.A. limit on how much a part-time employee can earn in a year has beed lifted to $5,100. I would like to offer new employees a little bit more when starting so that I can keep them here longer. And with our increase in volume, we will need extra people on during peak hours so that our service does not deteriorate. JK:ls August 1, 1988 CITY of MOUND 5341 M,t, YWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL / JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTO~ ~ JULY PARK DEPARTMENT REPORT v GENERAL COMMENT As you all are aware, the drought is still here. This again in July has limited our mowing time. The only thing growing is weeds, which require mowing when they are unsightly. And also little wear on equipment. Time is not being wasted. As you saw on the Parks tour July 28th, we have put our efforts into restoring shoreline. Currently, we are working on Twin Park. When finished, with help from the Street Department, we will have ~constructed a ramp=l~or winter access to the lake along with a spillway for a storm sewer run off and repaired a wash out along the shoreline. Now, if we can get some rain this fall, all the areas we have improved will be seeded. PARKS The new playground structures are now in at Belmont Park, Pembrooke Park and Clover Circle. We have had compliments on them and the summer parks program has been greatly aided. As you saw on the Parks tour, there are many more areas in need of playground equipment. I have proposed another four years that capital outlay will show about $22,500 for new playground equipment. COMMONS Lake Minnetonka is now down to the 926.97 ft level. That has caused a number of boats to be removed, or a search for other docking areas. We have placed some permit holders with other site holders more fortunate with good water depths. Currently, we have 428 sites paid for with 575 boats. PARKS DEPARTMENT REPORT AUGUST 1, 1988 PAGE 2 TREE REMOVAL In July we had two forced tree removals from private property. Three trees removed from city property and one large tree over 'hanging a beach trimmed. This year we have not seen the amount of removals that we did in past years. This may be a sign that we have caught up, so in the 1989 proposed budget I have reduced this line item by $3000. SUMMER PARK PROGRAM This is the first season that the city has combined with the Westonka Community Services to offer a quality program. Because this program does not end until August 5th, a summary will not be ready until next month. We have had good response in participation and compliments on the program. JF:ls CITY of MOUND 5341 f'/AY,,'/OOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-!!55 August 3, 1988 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: July's Activity Report This month normal service was performed on 5 vehicles. A new tongue jack was installed on the Sewer Dept. jet machine. One of Commerce Blvd~ street light poles had to be shortened 2 feet and reinstalled. The Police Dept. dog car was put back 10 original condition for caring passengers. Two major sweeper companies brought their sweepers out for us to inspect. Of the two companies Elgin and Mobil my recommendation if purchasing is approved is the Mobile unit. ,534! I,',,c, YV,,'$SD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 5538: r612~ .:72-I ! 55 August 10, 1988 TO: Ed Shukle City ~anager FROM: Geno Hoff Street Supt. SUBJECT: July's Activity Report Our 1988 sealcoating has been completed, as you know Allied Blacktop Co. go the bid for the job. It took them 2 days to do the work. The 30th of June and the 5th of July. They shot 39,977 gallons of CRS-2 emulsion oil and layed between 1800 and 1900 ton of buckshot. We sealed about 8 miles of streets. 2 weeks after that we swept up the access rock, 126 truck loads. We had a problem with a street light at the intersection of Commerce Blvd. and Bartlett Blvd., NSP called and said that there is a 8000 volt power line that was to close to the street light cross arm. The power line has been saging because of the very hot weather that we have had this summer. We had a spare street light poll on hand, so we cut 2½' off of the top and welded the cross arm back on and exchanged the 2 polls, NSP put it up and problem solved. The City owns a piece of property at the west end of Denbigh, lately we have received some complaints about the residents around there using it for a dump site. We hauled out 5 loads of debris, everything from brush and leaves to auto parts and dock sections. After we finished we posted the property with 5 No Dumping signs, this should take care of the problem. The Fire Department burned down an old house at 3026 Brighton Blvd. The Street Dept. cleaned up the debris and hauled it to the landfill. We hauled in 9 loads of fill and regraded the lot. We had to repair 4 more stone retaining walls this month. Page 2 3015 Durury 72' X 4~' $2,319.40 4954 Brunswick 54' X 3~' $1,294.85 4555 Dorchester 105' X 3~' $2,520.80 5065 Wren Rd. 43' X 3' $883.65 TOTAL $7,018.70 This should take care of the wall problems for this year unless we get alot of rain. We will have more walls to repair next year. CEMETERY Staked out 3 graves and 8 stones SIGN WORK 2 No Parking 1 Stop 2 Slow Children Working on 89 Street & Shop budget. Purchased 28 tons of 1~ rock this month. 7 No Dumping 3 street name signs. August 4, 1988 TO: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY COUNCIL O_b¢~/ FROM: JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR RE: JULY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1989 BUDGET Work on the budget began full force in July. After the June activity reports were processed, budget worksheets were distributed to all departments. I have started projecting Revenues for 1989. With all the changes made during the past legislative session, it is hard to predict what the levy limit will be for 1989. We usually have the final local gov't aid and levy limit figure by now. With the overhaul of the system the target date the State has is August 15. INSURANCE Ed and I met with Earl Bailey, our insurance agent, regarding 1989 insurance rates. Workman's Comp rates for most departments have stabilized and perhaps may even go down somewhat(the insurance pool had less claims this past year than anticipated). However, the Fire Department will see an increase due Fo legislative law regarding cancer presumption for firefighters. The general liability and all other insurance costs are projected to decrease from last year's budget by approximately 10%. Our total insurance costs for 1989 are projected at $55,000 for Workman's Comp and $92,000 for all other coverages. INVESTMENTS The following is July investment activity: Balance 7-1-88 Bought: CD 8. O0 CP 7.8O CP 7.96 T Notes 7.76 CD 7.9O FNMA 8. IO Matu red: Farm Cr 7.60 CD 7 .OO FNMA 6.90 CD 7 .O0 S7,372,194 Due 2-01-89 4M Fund 205,000 Due 12-27-88 American National 199,281 Due 1-O3-89 Marquette 480,556 Due 8-15-89 Dain Bosworth 379,471 Due 12-29-88 State Bank of Mound 200,000 Due 7-25-89 Marquette 300,000 Dain Bosworth State Bank of Mound Marquette State Bank of Mound (400,000) (260,OO0) (200,000) (125,000) Balance 7-31-88 S8,151,502 HOUND FIRE DEPARTI~ENT HONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR HONTH OF HONTH HONTH TO DATE 'TO' DATE EHERGENCY ORONO - FI RE s.o~uoo~ - F~ ~ EHERGENCY TOTAL FIRE CALLS TOTAL EHERGENCY CALLS INDUSTRIAL FALSE ALA~ EHERGENCY EHERGENCY TOTAL EHERGENCY TOTAL EHERGENCY TOTAL EHERGEUCY HOURS TOTAL FIRE HOURS HUTUAL AID RECEIVED ~ ~ ~ hIUTU~L AID GIVEN ~ ~']' / ,.F,' Mound, Minnesot& B D~YAY,-~r:'";~ IL.~'O~ I. Andersen / ~ ~ /~ ~. B~bb / ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~,00 ). Bryce w~ / ~ · ~. Bryce / ~ / ). C~rlson / ~ ; ,f. / /~ · 6.00 ~ Erickson / / ~ /f~ ~ Jy 6. O0 . Garvais / / ~ /~ ~ . ~ 6.00 :. Henderson / / ~ /~-- ~ ~0 ~,nn ,. Johnson / {/ ~ /~-- 0 ~/ ~,OO '.. K]eeberger / / A .. Landsman / / ~ '. Loraas ~ . / , · Nelson ~ / / p~d~r~n~ / / ~ /f- ~ 2d 6.00 . Rasmussen / / ~ /¢' ~ ~J 6.00 . Savage w' / ~ /~-- . St allman - / ; //- ~/Swenson ~ ~t ~ D MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR ~~ ~ 0 0 0 / 0 / MEN ON DUTY J. Andersen G. Anderson J. Babb J. Beauchamp D. Boyd D. Bryce S. Bryce ' D. Carlson 3 · S. Collins M. David -- B. Erickson S. Erickson J. Garvais ,~..e~=z /g~ C. Henderson G. Johnson /~ ~ M. Kleeberger '--'---- B. Landsman R. Marschke J. Nafus TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS M. Nelson A. Opitz B. Palm G. Palm M. Palm G. Pederson T. Rasmussen M. Savage T. Swenson W. Swenson R. Williams T. Williams MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA 5536A DRILL REPORT Time Time Discipline and Team WOrk. Critique of Fires Pre-Planning and Inspections Tools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Oneration Wearing Protective Clothing .Films Pumper Operation ,. Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstration~ Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations First Aid and Rescue Operation Use of Self-Contained Masks Inhalator Operation Note: ltours Trainin~ Paid Miscellaneous.. ~/~OW~° Andersen Enderson Babb Beauchamp Boyd Bryce BrYCe Carlson Collins David Erickson Erickson Ilouse Evolutions , Nozzle & llose Alliance Excused _X Unexcused 0 Present, Not paid Garvais ~i/j_M. Palm Grady ~/~l_ G. Pederson Heitz ~T. Rasmussen Henderson ~l},k_M. Savage Johnson ~_~I_R. Stallman Kleeberger' ~i/d_T. Swenson Landsman .. ~ ~. Swenson Marschke ~Ij_R. Williams Nafus ~I~I_T. Williams Nelson Oritz ~ Palm Drillmaster MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 DRILL REPORT Date: V- Discipline Work. Critique and Team of Fires · Pre-Planning and Inspections Tools & 'Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Oneration Wearing Protective Clothing Films Time Time Pumper Ooeration Fire Streams & Fr~ction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstrati6ns Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations First Aid and Rescue O~eration Use of Self-Contained Masks Inhalator Operation Note: Hours Trainin~ Paid Miscellaneous: Andersen ~nderson Babb Beauchamp Boyd Bryce Bryce Carlson Collins David Erickson Erickson }louse ,Evolutions , Nozzle & }lose Alliance ~EXcused ~ Qt/~.j. Garvais ~t/~_K. Grady D'/J-L' Heitz Q;/~C. 'Henderson ~G. Johnson ~_M. Kleeberger~ ~j_B. Landsman j. Marschke Nafus M. Nelson D'~A. Opitz [0 Unexcused 0 Present, Not paid ~/~_M. Palm ~G. Pederson ~/2. T. Rasmussen ~;/~k.M. Savage Q~/~_R. Stallman ~ T. Swenson W. Swenson ~//~R. Williams ~/~L~T. Williams Drillmaster (612) 472-1155 August 4, 1988 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK JULY MONTHLY REPORT There were 2 regular Council Meetings in July. Packet prepara- tion was done for each of these meetings. Minutes were prepared after each of these meetings. The Minutes from the last meeting in June were also prepared in July. 14 resolutions and 2 or- dinances were adopted at these 3 meetings. The resolutions were prepared and the 2 ordinances were published. There were clean- up items from the meetings and things that had to be sent to various persons. %----- I spent two days in July transcribing tapes for pending litiga- tion. The Department Heads attended a short seminar on employee evalua- tions. There was an all day meeting on the new election equipment; the changes in the election laws; and the procedures we will be fol- lowing in conjunction with Hennepin County. As President of MCFOA, I attended an educational planning meeting for the next conference in March of 1989. I also attended the Clerk's Institute banquet to present the 3rd year Clerks and Deputy Clerks with their Certificate of Completion. Linda just finished completing her second year of this course. I helped the Planning & Zoning Department temporary person with a number of items; obtained the new f~gures for the 1989 Fire Con- tracts from Hennepin County, inputted other budget pages into the computer; and answered the usual calls and questions from resi- dents. fc CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 August 4, 1988 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator SUBJECT: July's Recycling July 15 the containers were brought out to 3 of the apartment complexes. 6 containers were placed at each complex. 3 for paper, 1 for cans, 1 for clear glass and 1 for green and brown glass. Seahorses paper containers are full and they have paper stacked outside, cans~is full and clear glass----- is almost full. Grandview's paper containers are full, cans full, clear glass almost full. Lakewinds 2 paper containers full and not much in the other ones. We'll h~ve to talk to them about this. I think these will have to be emptied twice a month. This month I have received about 12 calls from people that are interested in recycling. I handed out 5 more lawn signs, also. July's pickup was 16.18 tons and 480 households. 5341 ~,~AYWOOE: ~OP E i',Z, OUNP~, t~,INNE$"f "'A 5'5364 August. 4, 1988 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. July's Activity Report WATER DEPARTMENT In July we pumped. 34,210,O00 gallons of water. We had 1 watermain break, 8 T-off's for non-payment, 2 T-on's, 4 meters replaced, 32 final readings, 4 Outside readers installed and 3 service calls. The new watermain on County Road 15 has started and should be completed by August 5. The new shop is coming along fine. Ail the floors are poured. The electricial work should start the first week in August. SEWER DEPARTMENT We spent most of our time on cleaning the main sewer lines on city easements and in the Dutch Lake area. We sent out 2 pumps for major repairs and repaired 3 pumps here. HOUND POLICE DEPARTMEN'I TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Len Harrell Monthly Report for July, 1988 STATISTICS The police department responded to 6?2 calls for service during the month of July. There were 42 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 12 burglaries, 21 lar- cenies, 2 arson, 4 criminal sexual conduct, 1 assault, and 2 vehicle thefts. There were B3 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses in- cluded 4 child abuse/neglect, 6 Forgery/NSF check, 20 criminal damage to property, 9 DWI's, 7 simple assaults, 13 domestics (6 with assault), 6 harassment, 2 runaway/truancy, 4 weapons charges, 5 narcotics violations, and ? miscel- laneous other offenses. The patrol division issued 219 adult citations and 19 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an ditional 34 citations. An additional 77 warnings were issued during the month. -- Five adults and two juveniles were arrested for felonies in July. Twenty-seven adults and four juveniles were arrested For misdemeanors. The department assisted in 17 vehiclular accidents, 6 with personal injuries. There were 19 medical emergencies and 113 animal complaints. Officers assisted surrounding agencies on mutual aid calls 13 times in July. Property valued at $35,981 was stolen during the month and $26,616 of that was recovered. Il. INVESTIGATION Investigator Grand worked on a total of 8 child protection cases during the month of duly; These cases accounted for 31.75 hours of investigative time. Additionally, 2 criminal sexual conduct cases involved over 20 hours of investiga- tion. A total of 45 child protection issues have been reported this year. MOUND POLICE REPORT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JUL~, 1988 Two individuals were arrested For felony theft in the at- tempt to steal two jet skis from the Cooks Bay area. One additional jet ski has been recovered. Four other thefts were investigated as were 2 burglaries, ! arson, a bribery, 2 assaults, a check case, and a harassment. Inv. Grand made several presentations with the new "911 squad". Formal complaints were issued in 16 cases. Those complaints included aggravated and gross DWl, open bottle, felony theft, assault, Oamage to property, no insurance, possession of a controlled substance, reckless driving, disorderly con- duct, and theft. III. MANPOWER The department used 55 hours of overtime during the month of July. A good part of that overtime was through court ap- pearances and arrest situations. Also, the Fourth of duly accounted for several shifts at premium pay. Officers earned about 24 hours in comp-time in June and used over 55 hours. OFFicers also used 139 hours of vacation and 24 hours of holiday time. IV. TRAINING Investigator Grand attended a one day course on child abuse. Three officers attended an up-date on recent legislative changes. Officer Ewald attended a four day crime prevention conference in Rochester. V. RESERVES The police reserves donated 150 hour; to the department and tl~e community in July. Fifty of those hours were in provid- ing security at the Incredible Festival. The reserves also assis%ed in four transports to various receiving Facilities. Reserves also assiste~ at the Raspberry Festival in Hopkins, the Delano parade, and in the "Officer- Friendly" presentations. Time was also spent in the training of new reserve officers. ?ART I CRIMES o~ ~= ~ ~ ADULT. JUV ~omicide 3riminal Sexual Conduct 4 1 1 Robbery ~ssault 1 1 1 Burglary 12 1 1 Larceny 21 1 -~ 2 1 1 Vehicle Theft 2 1 1 2 Arson 2 TOTAL 42 1 1 6 5 2 PART .II CRIMT'-~ Child Abuse/Neglect 4 1 3 ForEery/NSF Checks 6 1 Criminal Damage to Property 20 1 1 2 , Weapons 4 1 3 2 1 Narcotic Laws 5 4 6 Liquor Laws D~ 9 9. 9 SimPle Assault 7 2 3 _2 1 Domestic Assault 6 1 4 4 t Domestics (No Assault) 7 Harassment 6 1 1 Runaway/Incorrigibility/Truancy 2 1 1 1 Public Peace All Other Offenses 7 2 2 1 1 TOTAL 83 2 12 28 27 !. 4 PART III.&vPART IV Property Damage Accidents 11 Personal In.jury Accidents 6 Fatal Accidents O Medical~ 19 Animal Complaints 113 Mutual Aid 13 Other General Investi.~ations 510 TOTAL ACTIVITIES I 805 3 13 , 34 32 6 MONTH AL ACTIVITY SU~RY POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT JULY YEAR 1988 THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 147 789 "823 Non-Hazardous Citations 59 383 363 Hazardous Warnings 27 223 270 Non-Hazardous Warnings 29 464 j 552 Verbal Warnings 120 777 501 Parking Citations 34 357 239 DWI 9 58 67 OVER .10 6 .30 43 Property Damage Accidents 11 72 59 Personal Injury Accidents 6 19 24 F~--1 Accidents 0 0 0 Adult Felony Arrests 5 24 ~34 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 38 158 184 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 12 67 56 ~uvenile Felony Arrests 2 46 38 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 4 38 85 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 5 30 35 Part I Offenses 42 215 200 Part Ii Offen~es 83 474 492 Animal Complaints 113 677 672 Other Public Contacts 510 3,341 3,120 °" 1,281 8,343 7,968 Assists 75 342 276 Follow-Ups 33 270 301 HCCP 8 40 I~ CITATIONS DWI More than o10% BAC Reckless Driving Driving AFter Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speed No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired, or No Plates Illegal Passing Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or UnsaFe Turn Over the Centerline ParKing Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinance Derelict Autos Seat Belt Miscet laneous Tags TOTAL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JULY, 1988 ADULT O9 6 6 0 ! 0 l l 0 0 0 30 9 JUV 0 0 l 0 I 8 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 19 Il HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT WARNINGS No Insurance Traffic Equipment CroSswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Other Seat Belts TOTAL ARRESTS Hisc. Arrests Warrant Arrests ADULT 12 26 2l 0 5 0 3 1 68 0 11 JUV 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMMARY B i'kes Snowmobiles ITEM Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. Jewelry.& Guns Precious Metals Home Furnishings Radio & Electronic Equipment Vehicles & Veh|cle EquiPment Miscel.laneous TOTAL STOLEN $ 240 .26,000 65 2,247 1,635 2,360 1,200 2,234 $35,981 RECOVERED $ 15 26,000 1 475 120 $26,616 MOUND POLICE RESERVES MONTHLY HOURS JULY 1988 OFFICER R5 R6 Ri! R12 R13 RI4 R16 RI? DETAILS Emer. C/O 3 Res. Sq. Comm. S. 7 Training Instruction 2 Ride Al. 6.5 AOmin. 20 TOTALS 36.5 6 R23 TOTAL 3 3 3 12 5.5 7.5 6 2 13.5 31 71 9.5 9.5 5.5 7.5 16 30 20 26.5 9.5 16.5 31 150 16 ACTIVITIES THiS MONTH RaspDerry Festival-Hopkins 4 Transports Incredible Festival School Dance at Pon~ Arena Training of two new reserves OFFICERS R5 Thompson RI4 Svoboda R6 Hawks RI6 Niccum RII Roma in R17 Kohman RI2 Smith RI9 Nelson R13 Meuwissen R23 Vogel. PrepareO Dy DeDbie Thompson, Sgt. MOUND POLICE RESERVES 5EVERENCE ACCOUNTS dULY 1988 OFFICER Butch Hawks Debbie Thompson Ruth Vogel Dan Niccum Steve Smith Sherry Svoboda Dave Nelson Rob Meuwissen dohn Roma in in TOTALS Training DEPOSIT $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $6.50 $13.00 $13.00 $71.00 BALANCE $271.50 $388.50 $395.00 $199.50 $97.50 $78.00 $65.00 $91.00 $1685.50 Prepared by Debbie Thompson, Sgt. ~FSO$ PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? 'ITY CODES: NO INSTAkLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 0&12~189 THRU 07/25/88 PAGE A~T [;ODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 $0 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 09000 0'2001 09J02 {,,~K~03 09,004 Og~05 0'9010 0~13 0~]15 09,016 0~)18 ~019 07020 (,7021 0~)27 ~'~'0.30 0~040 07041 ~PiO0 200 SPEEDING J-SPEEDIN~ NO D/L, EXPIRED'D/L d-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L RESTRICTED D/L J-RESTRICTED D/L BAC OVER. 10 J-OPEN ~OTTLE SIGN J~$TOP $I~1 FAILURE TO YIELD EOUIPM=~T VIO!_ATION d-EQIPMENT VI~ATION CARELESS/RECKLESS d-CARELE~/RECKLESS J-OVER THE CENTER LINE CROSSWALK VIOLATION NO SEATBELT J-NO SEATBELT PAE~(ING/ALL OTHER TRAILER PARKING J-N8 TRAILER F'~iKING [.IAS/b'AR/DAC 29 15 2 i 2 13 I 2 10 34 25 113 3 2 8 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 6 1. 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 1 1 6 3 1 2 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 4 30 2 20 13 1 6 / ~qJW-' 28-JUL-88 :iFS03 ~I~ARY ISN"'S ONLY? ACTIVITY CODES: NO ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AR~ 06/26/88 THRU 07/25/88 PAGE ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 &O 70 80 90 TOTAl. 09210 PLATES/ND- IMPRDPER-EXP I~ 06,220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF DF (7F3(~ LD~T ARTICLES/OTHER 0~301 LO~T PERSONS 0Sr302 LOST ANIMALS ~312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 0~313 FOUND PROPERTY 09314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED 09430 PF-~sONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS ~440 HTR PERSONAL INJURY ACC. 09450 PROPERTY DA~qGE ACCIDENTS ~451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. O9561 DOG BITE 0':~63 DOG AT LARGE 09565 DOG LICENSE 09.730 MEDICALS 09731 DETOX-MEDICALS ~732 CRISIS INT.-MEDICALS ('~7.50 FIRES 05,~800 FALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED 0'7801 DOF, ESTIC/NO ASSAULT 0??00 ALL hCCF' CASES 07~'04 OPEN DOOR/ALARMS 8 2 7 1 3 21 1 1 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 I 1 3 5 1 1 1 2 1 4 2 2 2 3 2 1 8 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 I 5 1 4 3 4 17 1 1 1 1 1 I 2 3 I 2 1 ! 8 1' 1 2 1 1 7 4 1 RUN: 28-JUL-SE~ CF~2 ISN'~ ONLY? IIT¥ NO INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SEt,VICE ACTIVITY ~YSIS BY PATi~OL 06/26/88 THRU 07125188 PAGE ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ~0 TOTAL O992O 09,~0 0,qi--72 09,993 09994 A~303 A5351 A5352 A5354 A~3S5 A5502 B$~334 B3364 B3394 BJ494 B3764 BA3bO B4930 HANDGUN AF~LICATIDN SUSPICIOUS PERSON INTELLIGENCE W~TS MISC. VIOLATIONS MUTU~ AID/8100 MUTUAL AID/6500 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER 4-ACT NOT APFtlCABLE-HAND EIC-PDLICE ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-UNK WEA-ADLT-STR ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTE~='TS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS H~-HANDS-CHLD-AC~ ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HAR~-UNK WEAP-ADLT-AC~ BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-~,~( WEA~-CDM THEF'[ BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC RES FE~-U-U~E WEAF'-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAF'-COM THEFT BUE~ 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UM( WEAP-COM THEFT 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BuRG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAF'-~K AC[ BURG 4-AT FRC RES-D-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 2 1 1 1 2 2 4 3 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 11 3 3 2 4. 1 1 5 2 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '~IMARY ISN'S ONLY? ACTIVITY COD~S: NO ~L.L INSTALLATI~ ~ -- ~ PI]LICE D~ARTNENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATRDL AREA 06/26/08 THRU 07/2'2/08 PAGE. ~T NDE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIDN ........... PATRDL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 ~ 70 80 90 TOTAL B49~0 BJ(~3 4-AT ~ RES-N-UNX W~AP-UNK ACT BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-PDSSESS-CDCAIN-DTH CHAR D8500 DRUGS-SM~L AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSIDN F3083 AFFJDN 3-FE-UNK CDND-MTR UEH-$2500-$9999 F4085 ARSDN 3-MS-UNK CDND-MTR UEH-$299 LESS I3~.~60 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT DF A CHILD I3070 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-MALIC PUNISHMENl CHILD J25t~) TF~¥FIC-GM-ORIVE UND6R INFLUENCE DF LIQUi~R d27~ T~F-ACCID~GM-AGG~VATED VIOLATION JS'SFY~ TRAF-ACCID-~-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENK~E DF LIQUOR L1001 CSC 1-UNK ACT-UNK ASSAIL-UNDER 13-F L1075 CSC 1-UNK ~T-ACQUAINT-16-17-F L2652 CSC 2-ACCOHPLIC FRC CDER-PDS AUTH-UNDER 12-M L7127 CSC 4-ND FRC-PAREJIT-18 OLDEJ~-F ,~.,~,...~°':' JUVENILE-CURFEW ~5350 RUNAWAY. ~501 DRUG PARAZ'~,EF~ALIA-POSSESSION I~31~0 DISTbRB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING CO.~MUNICATIONS 0388,20BSE¢.,,iTY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT [~:~00BSENITY-MS-M, AIL CARRY OBSCEN [1ATTERS-OTH AUD P?,110 PF:.OF' DAMASE-MS-PRIVAIE-UNK INTENT ~"31:?,0 PROP DAPAGE-MS-BL'SINESS-UNK INTENT 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 18 2 im ~N: 28-dUL-6~ INSTALLAIION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE PRI~AR~ ISN:S ONLY? NO ~IT¥ CODES: ~ ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BT PATR~. AREA ~12&189 TI.RU 07125188 CODE P3310 T2021 T2029 T2159 T2169 T3159 T4021 T4059 T4159 T4169 UlO12 U3014 U3f)i6 5026 U3496 VI01? V1020 W31 1~3190 Y 11)70 ACTIVITY DES~IPTION T~SPAS~S- ~- ~ I VA~-U~&' INTEkF~ TH~J~T-$251-$2500-FE-F~ ~I~I~-MONEY THE-FT-$~l-$2500-FE-FP~M BUILD1NG-OTH PR~ TH~-$251-$2500-FE-F~ ~T~ V~I~-OTH P~ T~FT-$~51-$25~-~-F~ WAI~T-OTH PR~P TH~T-$2~ LESS-FE-F~ ~T~ V~IC~-O~H F~ T~FT-$2~ LESS-~-F~ BUILDING-MO~T T~T-$250 LESS-MS-F~ ~DS-OTH ~-~-F~ SE~. ~V GAS-OTH PR~ TH~T-$2~] '~SS-~S-F~ MOT~ ~I~-OTH ~OP T~FT-$250 LESS'~-F~ WATERC~FT-OTH P~ TH~T-FE-BY CHECK-$2501-~l~999 T~FT-MS-BY CHECK-$301-$5~ TH~T-~-BY CHE~-$2~ LESS T~FT~-ISSUE WORT~ES CHECK-S250 LESS THaT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-~O ~ U~AUTMORIZED USE-~-OVER 2500-BOAT MOTORIZED V~ TH~T-FE-OVER 25QO-OTH~ VEH-MOTORtZED ~EAF'Q~S-MS- DI SCHARGE-F I REWORKS-~O CH~ WEABO~S-K~-USES-OTH~ TYPE-NO CMAE ~-MS-OTMER ACT-F1REWORKS-~O CRtM A~ST GOVN-FE-BRIBER~ ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 3 1 1 1 TOTAL 5 2 1- 3 1 1 1 1. 1 6 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 i ~N: 28-~L-88 :FS03 ~I~R~ ISN'S ONLY? ACTIVITY CODES: NO ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOU~ POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 06/2bl88 ~ 07/25/88 PAGE 6 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATRDL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL REPORT TOTALS: 107 39 101 103 115 10 4 6 2 487 ~LIN: 2S-JUL-SS INSTALLATION NA~ -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OFF01 ** **** PRI~IARY I~'S ONLY? ND E N F O R S 'ION CODES: ALL CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISP~ITI~ GRID: Al 06/26/~ T~U 07/25/~ / ................ OFFENSES CUEAREI) ................. / ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEAP, r.q) CLEARED A40~7 1 A.~i.T 4-A,CT NOT AJ~PLICAEq..E-~tqND ~C-POLICE A5303 1 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTFJ~PTS H~-UNK W~-ADLT-STR A5~1 5 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTFJqF'TS HF,~-H~DS-ADLT-FAM A5352 2 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTE. Pts'TS HFU'I-HA~N~-ADLT-A~ 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100,0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 5 0 4 0 1 5 100.0 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 100,0 A5354 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTESTS HF~I.~N~-C~-F~ 3 o 3 o ~LT ~NFLICTS ATTEMPTs HF~M-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ A5502 I ASLT 5-TFRT BODILY HARM-U~ WEAP-ADLT-ACO ~'~ 3 ~RG 3-UitDCC ~S FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT ~,:<364 1 P.J_~RG 3-UNDCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEY~P-COM THEFT E~:394 1 BURG.. 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-U,~4K WEAP-CDM THaT 1 BJRG 3-UP~OCC RES ~;0 FRC-U-UN~;i WEAP-COM THEFT 1 BJRG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-ONK WEAP-COM THEFT 1 BJRG 3-UNOCC NRES ~;O FRC-N-U~tK WEF~o-CDM THEFl 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 .0 2 66.6 1 100.0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100,0 0 1 1 0 0 0 O. ,0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 EESFRC-P~-U,~.~( WEAP-UNK ACT E4~30 E~.JRG 4-AT FRC RES-D-uF~x. wEAF'-U~):i ACT 1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0 )FFOI ~RIl~qR~ ]SN~S ONLY? NO DISPOSITION CODES: ALL ACTIVITY CODES: ALL GRID: INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITIDN 06/26/88 THRU 07125/88 ~CTIVITY CO~/ OFFENSES ACTUAL )6STA~IPTION REPORTED UNF ~DIJNDEI) OFFENSES PENDING PAGE 2 / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT AgIULT JUVENILE EXCEPTI~ CLEARED CLEARED )URG 4-AT F~ RES-~-U~( WEAP-UIt( ACT ! 0 1 1 )49?O )URG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK WE~qF'-UNK ACT 1 0 1 1 )RUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-POSSESS-CDCAIN-DIH CHAR )85OO 2 )RUGS-SMALL At'E)UNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION =308-3 ~'SDN 3-FE-I.~IK CDND-MTR VEH-$2500-$9999 ~RSD~ 3-MS-UNK COND-MTR VEH-$299 OESS 0 2 0 I3060 ~IM AGP;ST FAil-MS-NEGLECT DF A CHILD I3070 1 ~RIM AGNST FAM-MS-MALIC PUNISHMENT CHILD J2500 1 [RAFFIC-GM-[~IVE U~DER INFLUENCE OF LIOUDR ~700 3 FRAF-A~ I D-~-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION 5 FRAF-ACCID-~S-GRIYE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR .1001 ~SC 1-UNK ACT-UHK ASSAIL-UP:DER 13-F 1 0 1 1 .1075 1 ]SC 1-U~;K ACT-ACQUAINT-i6-17-F .3652 1 .'SC "' '.rrr~', ~-~,~U:,~LI~ FRC COER-F'DS AUTH-U,~DER 13-M .7127 :SC ~-I:C~ FRC-F'AREP~I-18 OL£~ER-F I 0 I 1 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 '1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 I 3 0 0 3 5 0 0 5 100.0 100,0 I(Q.O 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 im 'F,~t: 28-~L-88 1NSTAL~TI~ ~ -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE OFFO1 **** ** PRIMARY IS,~'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S FICh'~ CODES: ALL CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL ~12/:,18.~ THRU 07/25/8~ ~TIVITY [;ODE./ FJF ~N,qES ACT UAJ_ ~S~IPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDE]) OFFENSES PENI)ING / ................ O~ENSES CLEAF, ED ................. / .... BY AFd~EST .... BY TDTAL PF. RCENI' ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTI~ CLEARETJ CJ_F. ARF, I) 5313 1 d~JUENI~E-CURFEW ~;:~350 1 Fx~tAWAY P~,501 1 [~UG PAF~qPMERNAJ. I A-POSSESS I ON 7 DISTURB P~-MS-HARRA~ING CO~I~TIDNS ~8~ 1 O~ITY-~-OB~ P~ONE OB -MS-~IL C~RY OB~I ~TT~S-OTH AUD F~110 18 ~P D~GE-MS-~IVATE-UNK INT~T ~ DA~-~-B~INESS-UNK INT~T ~310 4 ~'ASS-~-PRIVATE-U~ INT~T T2021 2 T~-$251-$~OO-FE-F~ BUILDING-MONEY T20~ 1 TMEFT-$251-$2500-FE-F~ BUiLDING-OTH PROP T2159 3 TH~T-$251-s2500-FE-FRM ~T~ VEHIC~-OTH PROP T216~ TM~T-$25~-S2500-FE-FRM WAi~CRAFT-OIM PR~' 1 LESS-FE-FRM M~TOR VEMiCLE-OTH PROP T4021 1 TMEFi-$250 LESS-MS-FEM BUiLDIP;S-mOriEY 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 7 6 0 I 1 0 1 0 1 17 17 0 " 1 & 0 4 2 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 100.0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 0 1 14.2 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 1 50.0 50.0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 OFFO1 P~I~RY ISN'S ONLY? NO DIS~OSITIO~ CODES: ALL ACTIVITY CODES: AU. GRID: AU. ACTIVITY CODE/ DESCRIPTION INS'[ALLATI~ NAJ'IE -- MDU~ID PI]LICE DEEP~TMENT ENFDRS OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPDSITIDN 06/26/88 THRU 07/25188 OFFENSES ACTUAL REPORTED UNFDLgtDED OFFENSES PENDING PAGE / ................ OFFENSES CLEAREIi ................. / .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT ADULT ~VENILE EXCEPTIDN CLEARED CLEARED T4059 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP 1 0 1 1 1 T ~HEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FFo'i SELF SRV GAS-OTH ~(]P T4i59 6 THEFT-S250 LESS-~-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH F~DP 14169 2 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-F~M WAT~P,~FT-OTM PROP UlO12 1 TtEFI-FE-B¥ CHECK-$2501-$199'79 ~014 1 THEFT,MS-BY CHECK-$30'I-$500 U3016 2 THEFT-MS-BY CHECK,-$250 LESS U3026 2 THEFT-MS-ISSUE WFiRTHL_ES CHECK-SC50 LESS U3496 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 LESS 0 1 1 0 6 5 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 I 1 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 0 VlO19 1 U~AUTMORIZED USE-FE-OVER 2500-BOAT MOTORIZED 1 V~ THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-OTHER VEIl-MOTORIZED i'.r3180 2 WEAF'D~';S- MS- D I SCMARGE-F I REWORKS-NO CMAR WEAF'O,~;S-MS-USES-OTMER TYPE-ND CMAR 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 '1 0 I 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 I 0 0 1 16.6 0 1 0 1 50.0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 2 100.0 0 1 0 1 lO0. O I 0 0 1 1 (:"" 1 0 0 1 lO0, 0 ~: 28-~L-88 OFFO! INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE. PRIMARY ISN"$ O,~Y? 'I~ CODES: ALL ~S: ALL ~F~SE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITI~ ~ID: ~L 06/26/~ T~U 07/~/~ / ................OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / ACIIVITi CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL I:~-~ENT ~SCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUND~ OFFEN~ES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED REPORT TOTAJ. S - 11c/ 3 116 70 28 6 12 40 ~.6 MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING JULY 25, 1988 Present were: Chairm~n Thomas Reese; Commissioners Vern Andersen, William Meyer, GeoFF Michael, Kenneth Smith, Brad Sohns. and William Thal; Council Representative Elizabeth Jensen; City Planner Mark Koegler; Building OFFicial Jan Bertrand and Secretary Susan Krebs. Frank Weiland was excused due to illness. Also present were the Following interested persons: ShaFFer and Alvina T. ShaFFer. Warren F. MINUTES The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of July 11, 1988, were presented For consideration. Jensen moved and Sohns seconded a motion to approve the minutes as printed. The vote was unanimously in Favor. A copy of Jean Koone's letter was handed out. Jan Bertrand suggested that any changes in the rewording of the draft of the housing maintenence code be done by the housing subcommittee, Forwarded to her office, and returned to the Planning & Zoning Commission at the next meeting August 8, 1988, or at the training meeting, in the end of August. BOARD OF APPEALS I. Case No. 88-716 Setback Variance---3106 Priest Lane, Lot 1, Block Z, Highland Shores; PID Z3-11?-Z4 34 0075. Applicants Warren F. and Alvina T. ShaFFer were present. The ShaFFers are proposing to do structural modifications to an existing deck with a screened-in porch, below; the existing setback of the screened-in porch is approximately 14.5 Feet to the lakeshore. The home was built in 1970 and purchased in I976; in 1978, the city established Flood plain elevations For Lake Mtnnetonka of 929.4 N.G.V.D., which requires a setback of 50'. The Building OFFicial, Jan Bertrand, suggested that rather than allow a deck that will project close to shore, the deck and screened-in porch below be kept in a projected line with the edge of the home, which will shorten up the projection to shoreline by 4' and give them a setback of approximately 19'. · This would require a 30' variance. The' south side of the lot, abutting the lakeshore, should have just a Four Foot walkway on the south side to an existing patio door. Chairman Thomas Reese asked the ShaFFers if they were satisfied with the staff's recommendation; the ShafFers said that although they would accept the compromise, they would prefer to rebuild the existing deck/porch as it had been, both because they Felt it does not affect anyone else 'in the neighborhood and because they want the porch to tie the house into the land architecturally. Planning & Zoning C~t$$ton Minutes July 25, 1988 - Page Two Geoff Michael proposed that the Shaffer$ be able to replace the structure; Jan Bertrand pointed out that both the ordinance and the land have changed since the original structure was built. It was moved by Brad Sohns and seconded by Will i am Thal to approve the staff recommenclation. The vote was six tn favor, with two (Smith and Michael) opposed. The motion carr i ed. ~ In further discussion, Smith explained his opposition to acceptance was because the Shaffers were not asking to expand the structure but just wanted to bring it to code. William Thal expressed his concern that non-acceptance might set a negative precedent in future. Brad Sohns felt the compromise to be a good solution and one that followed the criterion for granting of a variance. This will go before the City Council on August 9, 1988. DISCUSSION I. Comprehensive Plan - Land Use section. Mark Koegler, City Planner, handed out this section, whtch..wi11 be discussed in detail at the next meeting, and highlighted a few points: Page three deals with the added value of new construction in the city; between 1973 and 1978 the city averaged $2.35 million per year of new value, from 1979 to 1987 that average grew to $6.4 million, and 1986 and 1987, the value was about $10 million for each of those two years. Koegler Felt this seemed to be an indicator that the commission was moving in their planned direction. He also highlighted page 8, which refers to nonconforming sections previously discussed, and shows that the R-I, R-2 and R- 3 are almost identical in terms of overall city-wide confor~nce at 18, 19 and 20%, and shows consistency. Koegler said that the text basically concluded that the Planning Commission had looked at changes in the land use designations and zoning as a result of potential higher concentrations of nonconforming lots, particularly Shad~ood Point and three other areas, and made the decision not to amend the ordinance in those cases just because the lot size criteria alone was not sufficient. 2 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes July 25, 1988 - Page Three He pointed out that the text took a little more stringent stand than the city does at present; and gave as an example a piece on Future land setback to lakeshore use committment to planning towards the end of the document. 'Chairman Reese asked IF discussion about the shoreline and commons issues were included. Koegler explained that it talked about the three types of commons that are now in existence. From his point of view, he sees a couple major issues being generated as time goes on and lakeshore is harder to obtain- demand For usage and cost For Improvements; in terms of demand For usage, there is the lottery system, in terms of costs, he Felt that those should be attributed to those who directly benefit From the usage of the facilities and it should not be a general tax obligation, which may also result in higher permit fees in the Future. Wetlands are not included in the text, but there will be an added section dealing with natural resources. Concern was voiced that the text may not deal specifically enough with some of the wetland issues that have surfaced since the ordinance was passed, and this was discussed. The shoreline issue will be starting shortly in the Future. Jan Bertrand put a wetlands permit item on the agenda For the next meetings. The Building OFFicial also expressed a desire to make "one last pitch" For land use, using Pembrook as an example: with multiple zoning districts (RI, RZ), new 6,000 square Foot lots are being created every month in Mound. By Filing For separation of tax parcels with the county, if a person has 6,000 square Feet and is zoned R-2, the lot meets all the zoning criteria. It is not a subdivision; it is only a lot split of tax parcels. IF a whole block was owned and a person wanted to sell off part of his land, and it met those requirements, he could sell off 6,000 square Feet parcels in an R-2. She suggested writing an R-! and R-2 into an ordinance under the R-I provision, and new lots could not be created with 6,000 square Feet. IF a statement of Fact is included which states that if he is within 60% of the required · lO,O00 square Feet and is a lot of record, building can continue, but new lots cannot be created. She Felt that when the city had new parcels, those parcels should comply with a more updated standard For lot area. She Felt that, as it stands, high density is being created in situations such as this and due to the Fact that subdivision is not required and, as a result, does not have to go before the commission, nothing at present can be done about it, and suggested only having an R-! in the City of Mound. Discussion Followed. It was' decided that the city planner talk to the attorney about legal concerns in regard to this concept. 3 Ii Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes July 25, lgB8-Page Four Fence OrOinance Revision. Section 23.4t5 (4) g.) planner presented new wording For The Fence ordinance. The city it was moved by Vern Andersen and seconded by GeoFF Michael to accept the changes to the wording oF the Fence ordinance. in Further discussion, Bill Meyer suggested removing the word "a11" From the ordinance in the sentence, "Fences shall be installed such that the Finished side Faces all abutting properties." The motion then passed unanimously. A public hearing on the Fence ordinance will be held on August 22nd at the Planning Commission Meeting. 3. Sign Ordinance - Section 365:05, Subdivision 8. The city planner stated that there was a provision in the sign ordinance that said that if the permitee/owner failed to remove or alter the sign so as to comply with the provision, they had 30 Oays to remove it. He cited a case in which ~ person with an illegal sign did not remove it until 30 Oays had passed, as per.. the ordinance. He recommended removal oF the "30 day" clause, substituting- it with, "immediately," and allowing the building oFFicial some discretion in the speed in which it was removed, aepenOing upon the individual sign. A motion was made by Smith and seconded by Sohns to approve the suggested modification oF the. sign ordinance For a public hearing. It was passeO unanimously. A public hearing on the sign ordinance will be held on August 22nd at the Planning Commission Meeting. 3.8) Variance For street Frontaoe on Westedge, City oF Mound, part of Government Lot 4, Section 23, Township Il?, Range 24. This item was referred back to the planning commission from the city council. The city planner recommended that the property does require a variance. He said that the piece oF property is city property and is slightly over three acres. The city now has a purchase agreement from a would-be buyer. Koegler cited a section in the zoning code that says a Jot of record may be used ~or single Family detached dwelling purposes, providing the area thereof meets al 1 setback and minimum lot area requirements provided (l) it has Frontage on an improved public right-o~-wayj he said that the clause has brought about two debates as to the definition dE "Frontage"- does it mean 60 Feet For R-l, or does frontage mean Frontage (l', 2', 3', etc.). The city planner stated that in discussing it with the city attorney, the word "improved" is what causes %his to come back ~or a variance. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes July 25, 1988-Page Five does abut right-of-way but does not abut the improved portion of the right-of-way because the street veers into Minnetrista. He asked that the planning commission look at this and see if it Finds merit in the granting of a variance to a]]ow this to be 'established as a buildable lot with the 33 Foot frontage that is there, and there would be a connection made between it and WesteOge. He also stated that it was a very time-sensitive issue which is why Ed Shukie, City Manager, asked that it be added to this meeting's agenda. Mark Koegler brought up that there are different standards used For )ors of record For a number of things, and cited as example page 32, which lists the R-! qualifications on lot width requirements and in which a lot 40' to 80' wiOe has less setback requirements For a lot of record than for a newly-created lot, six Feet on one side instead of ten. Further, if a new R-I lot is being created, it must have 60' of width and ten foot stdeyard setbacks, but if there is an existing lot of record that is 99' wiOe, only eight feet are required on one side, with ten feet on the other. He further argued that this clause to the ordinance is different, an exception from normal standards,, and doesn't say, "60' of Frontage," but rather "frontage," and that the property has Frontage. However, though interpretive, he Felt that this right- of-way was probably not considered improved. Liz Jensen Drought up the discussion at the city council meeting and that John Cameron, City Engineer, had suggested even putting gravel on the right-of-way to improve it, at a cost of approximately $!,000. She also pointed out the difficulty in getting to the property unless one goes across land that is in Minnetrista, and the need to provide access. Cha i rman Reese Vd i ced h i s dp i n i on that the property was not needed as more park land, as Mound has plenty, and while he could sympathize with the residents that had submitted a petition and. · wanted to keep it as open land, it was not necessary nor could anyone el se De able to get to the property easi l y if it were clesignated as park land. Bill Meyer proposed that a recess De called during which time commission members could go and look at the property and Chairman Reese called For a 20 minute recess. AFter the recess, discussion o~ the variance request continued. Planning & Zoning Commission MinuTes ~uly Z5, l~88-Page 5ix Chairman Reese asked the city planner what the wording would be on the variance anO Koegler suggesteO covering Doth bases, from the lot wiOth requirements as specified in 23604.5 anO from the provision on existing lots of record, 23.403 item l, with "improved," to allow creation of a builOable lot with 33' of frontage on a presently unimproved public right-of-way, which will be improveO. : In further discussion, Smith asked who would build the roaOway to give the property frontage, and Jan Bertrand answered that it was part of the purchase agreement that the city provide access to the property. Jensen again stated that, per city engineer John Cameron, that obligation could be met with a gravel road. Koegler said they would be structuring the wording to reference the motion in the resolution both to the lot of record section where it states, "improved," and to the R-I provision that states, "60 feet." Liz Jensen suggested that the commission include in its findings that this commission does find that residential development is proper planning for the site. Koegler agreed that the language of the request reflect the planning commission's, finding that residential is the best use, as we!.'l as the 'commission's agreement that a right-of-way be improved, as both are concerned with the larger issue of planning. Bill Meyer moved and Michael secondeO that a resolution be put together for the council with a statement of findings that will include some discussion of the planning findings and the fact that there are future right-of-way options for extending the existing 33' right-of-way that is there, and that the variance specifically will be to sections 23403 and 23604.5, with referenced subsections, with discussion of lot width and improved aspects of the public right-of-way. The vote was unanimous. In further Oiscussion, it was decided that when the housing subcommittee finishes with the Oraft revisions, Jan Bertrand, BuilOing Official, will give the final Oraft of the housing maintenance code to the planning and zoning commission and a date will be set or a public hearing. Liz Jensen noteO the informational item, housing market study, 4 B., as being one particularly of interest. 6 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes July 25, IDBB-Page Seven 'ADJOURNMENT Sohns movea ana Anaersen seconaed a motion to adjourn the meeting at 9:30 P.M. The vote on the motion was all in Eavor. Thomas Reese, Chairman Attest: TRIAX CABLEVISION 2~81 Wllshlm Blvd. Mound, Minnesota $$384 472-6394 or 1-~00.642-2"~15 July 26, 1988 Mr. Ed J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle: This letter is to advise you that Triax Cab!evision is changing its rates effec-ive November 1, 1988. Ail existing subscribers will receive their rate change notices ninety days in advance of effective date. I have enclosed the subscriber notice and the existing rate card for your information. In an effort to be responsive to subscriber requests, we are planning on making sorae changes in our channel lineup. You will be notified of those changes at the proper time. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Mary A. Smith Regional Manager MAS:cj Enclosures CC: Jim Kutzner, Cable Commission Chair File NOTICE OF RATE INCREASE Effective November l, 1988 The Basic Service rate will be increased from $14.95 to $16.95 per month. All other monthly rates will remain the same. Other charges reflected in the rate changes will be: - Basic Installation of new subscriber will increase from $4.95 to ~35.oo - Each additional outlet at time of basic installation will be decreased from $9.95 to $4.95 - Reconnection Rate Changes: - Relocation rate wil~increase from free to $15.00 - Reconnection of former subscriber will increase from $4.95 to $25.00 - Reconnection of Non-Pay accounts will increase from $25.oo to $35.oo Please be advised that this notice is being mailed to you 90 days in advance of effective date. All subscribers will be mailed a new channel lineup and rate card With their October billing. ATTENTION SUBSCRIBERS !!! If you have a H~mlin 42 Channel Slide Bar Converter phone: 4?2-6394 or 1-800-642-2915 HAMI. IN 42 CHANNEL CONVERTOR If you are a subscriber who has one of these converters, please contact us so shat we may exchange your 22 Channel Converser, at no expense to you, for a larger capacity converser. The change ouS'~s necessary to accommodaze the planned expansion of zhe channel lineup. Il Rate Information Monthly Services Rate Basic - One Outlet $14.95 Each Additional Outlet $ 1.95 TV, FM Stereo, VCR Each VCR Hookup --O-- Remote Control $ 3.00 Premium Channels First Premium $ 9.95 Each Additional Premium $ 6.00 Installation $ 4.95 $ 9.95 $ 9.95 ~0~ Reconnect Charges Transfer - House-to-House within 30 days Reconnect - Same Resident to Same Outlets Each Additional Outlet or VCR Hookup Reconnect - Non-Pay Account FREE $ 4.95 $ 9.95 $25.00 Other Charges Upgrade of Premium Channel Downgrade of Premium Channel Change of Premium Channel Upgrading One Additional Outlet Each Additional Outlet Same Time Relocation of Outlets $ 4.95 $ 9.95 $25.00 $ 9.95 $25.00 Service Charges Collection Charge NSF Return Check Charge S25.00 $15.00 For Customer Service Please Phone: (612) 472-6394 or 1-800-642-2915 P,ices subject to change METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN. 55101 612 291-635'. July 22, 1988 L,.,...12 9 1988 To: Local Government Contact People The Metropolitan Council staff has prepared preliminary April 1, 1988 population and household estimates for your community. These preliminary estimates, together with a fact sheet containing the primary data used to prepare your community's estimates, are enclosed. The Council would like to hear your comments or concerns before finalizing the estimates for the State Department of Revenue. The change in estimated population or number of households is a part of the formula used to determine levy limits applicable in 1988 for counties and for cities of 5,000 or more population. The Council also uses the numbers to monitor population and household changes in Metropolitan Area communities. Please address questions concerning the levy limits and local govermment aids to Rich Gardner, Minnesota Department of Revenue, 296-2286. We'd like to finalize these estimates by August 15, 1988. To do this we need your comments as soon as possible. If you have concerns about the estimates, please contact Kathy Johnson of the Council's staff at 291-6332 as soon as possible. We will make every attempt to work with you to make any necessary adjustments in time to be incorporated in the Revenue Department's calculations. Written comments may also be directed to Ms. Johnson at the Council's new mailing address. Because the population and household estimates are of great importance to the cities, as well as to the Council in its planning work, we want to provide estimates that are not only accurate but treat each city fairly and consistently. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Steve Keefe Chair SK/dc Enclosures Il METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PROVISIONAL POPUL&TION ESTIMATE - APRIL 1, 1988 lifT. o, Town,hip //~0~./(. n Housing Estimate 1980 By Type Housing Units Sin§ie-Famiiy Townhouse MultifamHy q (~ q Mobile Home / f 1988 Housing Units Estimated Total (Including Uncompleted Estimated Estimated 1987 Permits) Completed Occupied Household Estimates 1980 Household Estimate 1987 Household Estimate 1988 Household Estimate Population Estimates 1980 Total Population 1980 Group Quarters Population 1988 Group Quarters Population 1988 Population in Households 1988 Population Estimate 0 qq / Persons Per Household 1980 Persons per Household 1987 Persons per Household 1988 Persons per Household APRIL 1, 1988 POPULATION Ah~D HOUSEHOLDS ESTIMATES HENh~PIN COUNTY Population Households April 1, April 1, April 1, April 1, 1980 1988 1980 1988 Census Estimate Estimate Estimate ''Bloomington 81,831 85,299 28,660 33,898 Brooklyn Center 31,230 29,420 10,751 11,270 Brooklyn Park 43,332 53,842 15,268 20,214 Champlin 9,006 14,500 2,733 4,685 Chanhassen (Pt.) 8 4 2 1 Corcoran 4,252 4,952 1,243 1,482 Crystal 25,543 24,900 8,977 9,389 Dayton (Pt.) 4,000 4,295 1,161 1,277 Deephaven 3,741 3~741 1,223 1,332 Eden Prairie 16,263 32,956 5,383 12,872 Edina 46,073 46,095 17,961 20,363 Excelsior 2,523 2,574 1,149 1,258 Fort Snelling 223 216 17 17 Golden Valley 22,775 21,318 7,597 8,289 Greenfield 1,391 1,545 402 480 Greenwood 653 656 234 255 Hanover (Pt.) 248 262 64 74 Hassan Twp. 1,766 1,981 452 562 Hopkins 15,336 14,850 7,061 7,479 Independence 2,640 2,770 789 896 Long Lake 1,747 1,988 586 765 Loretto 297 345 109 142 Maple Grove 20,525 33,882 6,239 11,340 Maple Plain 1,421 1,803 465 654 Medicine Lake 419 398 162 168 Medina 2,623 3,035 765 972 Minneapolis 370,951 355,800 161,858 163,616 Minnetonka 38,683 43,742 12,667 17,162 Minnetonka Beach 575 596 187 220 Minnetrista 3,236 3,662 974 1,206 Mound 9,280 9,951 3,384 3,7~7 New Hope 23,087 22,944 7,627 8,3~5 Orono 6,845 7,284 2,291 2,629 Osseo 2,974 2,707 1,015 1,002 Plymouth 31,615 45,809 10,491 17,325 Richfield 37,851 36,760 15,258 15,743 Robbinsdale 14,422 14,588 5,705 6,246 Rockford (Pt.) 380 469 125 175 Rogers 652 716 210 247 St. Anthony (Pt.) 5,619 5,448 1,935 2,159 St. Bonifacius 857 1,086 281 390 St. Louis P~k' 42,931 43,700 17,669 20,243 Shorewood 4,646 5,094 1,484 1,807 Spring Park 1,465 1,584 684 758 Tonka Bay 1,354 1,479 495 598 Wayzata 3,621 3,711 1,560 1,699 '~.and 526 496 i83 181 League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 (612) 227-5600 (FAX: 221-0986) July 22, 1988 TO: Mayors, Managers, Clerks JUL ? FROM: Ann Higgins, Federal Liaison SUBJECT: 1988 NLC Congress of Cities, December 3-7, Boston, Massachusetts City officials need to begin planning now to attend the 1988 NLC Congress of Cities, December 3-7, in Boston. LMC urges you to make decisions immediately regarding registration and travel arrangements to take advantage of lower fares and convenient accommodations. Attendance by city officials is likely to be very high since the historic area and opportunities for lively meetings combine to offer a strong interest for officials seeking the latest information and up-dates on urban issues. If your city clerk does not have a conference program brochure and registration form from the National League of Cities, please call and request one. TRAVEL AND HOTEL RESERVATIONS Below please find flight schedules and available airfares arranged by International Travel Exchange. Cindy Arendts is providing the bookings for travel reservations for Minnesota city officials on the flights listed here. If you have questions, please call her at 612-483-8236. Please pay close attention to fare restrictions and deadlines for reservations and payment. In order to obtain the lower fares, it is important to be certain that you will not need to change or cancel your flight reservation because costly penalties are imposed. Airline Flight Schedule and Airfare Information The following flights are available for travel to and from the conference: TO BOSTON: Friday~ December 2 Northwest #720 *Northwest #1642 departs Mpls/StP 8:05 a.m. 5:50 p.m. arrives Boston 11:50 a.m. 9:35 p.m. Saturday~ December 3 Northwest %720 8:05 a.m. 11:50 a.m. FROM BOSTON: Wednesday~ December 7 departs Boston Northwest %47 4:10 p.m. 'Northwest %357 6:55 p.m. arrives Mpls/StP 6:20 p.m. 8:45 p.m. Thursday, December 8 Northwest %153 9:00 a.m. 10:57 a.m. *Reservations on NW %1642 outgoing and returning on either Wednesday or Thursday will result in lowest available fare, due to late time of day departure. Check with travel agency. Fares available as of 7/19/88: $195.50 - $210.50 (including taxes) Airfares and times are subject to change. International Travel Exchange will provide up-to-date information on lowest available fares and seating as well as flight schedule changes. Please be sure to contact Cindy Arendts if you have questions. (See phone numbers listed below.) To make reservations, call Cindy Arendts at International Travel Exchange at 612-483-8236 or 1-800-328-6795, Extension 483. The address for the travel agency is as follows: " Cindy Arendts International Travel Exchange 3585 North Lexington Avenue, Suite 120 St. Paul, MN 55126 .Limited Super Saver seats are available on the flights listed above. Make your reservations early to obtain lowest available rates. These rates are based on non-refundable, non-exchangeable tickets. It would be preferable to make reservations at higher, non-restrictive rates if you are likely to need to change your travel plans, after you have made your reservations. PLEASE MAKE RESERVATIONS BEFORE OCTOBER 15 TO ASSURE BEST POSSIBLE SEATING AND FLIGHT SELECTION. LIMITED SEATING IS AVAILABLE ON ALL FLIGHTS LISTED, BUT AVAILABILITY DEPENDS ON DEMAND. Northwest Airlines will guarantee refunds in case airfares are lowered after ticketing is completed for those with reserrvations made earlier. If ticketing is not complete prior to the effective date for higher rates, higher rates will prevail. Hotel Accommodations - A Word of Caution It is equally important to avoid any cancellation or changes in NLC Conference registration since the demand for hotel space will be high, resulting in hotel accommodation reservations at distant locations for late registrants. If you change your arrival date, the hotel may not agree to hold your reservation (and release your room, while retaining your deposit). HOTEL ROOM RESERVATIONS MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A NATIONAL CREDIT CARD OR BY SENDING THE HOTEL A DEPOSIT NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 4 (AFTER YOU HAVE RECEIVED CONFIRMATION OF YOUR ACCOMMODATIONS FROM THE HOTEL3. THE HOTEL WILL AUTOMATICALLY CANCEL YOUR HOTEL RESERVATION UNLESS SUCH ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE. IMPORTANT NLC PROGRAMS The recently opened Hynes Convention Center will be the site of NLC Conference programs. Hotels adjacent to the center offer more than 5,000 rooms, along with enclosed wa!kways linking the convention center tO shopping areas. The NLC brochure that has been sent to many cities also describes pre-conference seminars and other related conference events and activities. Many require payment in addition to the NLC conference registration fee. Please note that registrations postmarked by September 5 are at a reduced rate (early registration). NLC has invited both presidential hopefuls to address the conference so city officials may get a chance to hear a major address by the President-elect. Four workshop tracks have been organized: "Investing in People and Neighborhoods"; "Creating Economic Vitality"; "Financing Your City's Infrastructure" and "Controlling and Managing Growth". In addition, there are sessions emphasizing leadership skills including "Leadership Dynamics-Dynamic Leadership" and "New Ways to Deliver Traditional Services". In addition to the major program tracks, the conference also offers a variety of special workshops on such topics as "Reconciling Public Office, Family and Career"; "Hot Topics for Local Legislative Control"; "Siting Municipal Incinerators"; "City and Bank Partnership for Community Reinvestment", etc. Workshops will be held on Sunday, December 4, as well as on Monday - Wednesday, Deecember 5-7. Minneapolis be will be featured in a program on neighborhood livability, along with other innovative and helpful how to presentations from cities across the nation. NLC POLICY COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND POLICY ADOPTION Minnesota city officials serve on all 5 NLC Steering Committees. Policy recommendations from each of those committees will be reviewed by the full NLC Policy Committees (to which LMC is authorized to appoint up to 5 additional Minnesota city officials to serve as policy committee members for a one-year term which commences each year at the NLC Congressional-City Conference, held in February or March; those appointments may also be renewed for addtional terms.) Policy committees will meet to deliberate and vote on policy recommendations on Sunday, December 4. Those actions will then be, reviewed by the NLC Resolutions Committee on Monday, December 5. Policy committee meetings will be held in the morning at 9:00 a.m.; and again in the afternoon. Afternoon committee sessions are scheduled to end by 4:30 p.m. (A more detailed schedule of committee meetings will be available in the fall; committees will be scheduled for either the a.m. or p.m. slots; no committee meetings will be scheduled for the full day on December 4.) City officials appointed to 1988 NLC policy committees are expected to attend those important policy development discussions and participate in the policy review and adoption. City officials serving as NLC voting delegates for their city or for LMC will have voting privileges at the NLC Business MeetiNg, to be held on Wednesday, December 7, beginning at 10:30 a.m., immediately following the closing general session. It is very important that the League have a full slate of voting delegates present for the business meeting. Please plan your schedule accordingly if you are appointed a voting delegate (or alternate) for your city. FUTURE MAILINGS AND INFORMATION ON LMC DELEGATION ACTIVITIES Later this fall, I will mail information on policy issues and Minnesota · delegation activities to all city officials who currently serve on NLC committees as well as to all other city officials registered for the confereence. The League is making special arrangements this year for exciting and unusual delegation programs at the NLC conference. We want to give LMC member city officials a chance to take part in special programs planned especially for LMC delegates. You'll hear more about these activities in the fall when NLC registration information will provide the League with a list of those registered for the conference. Right now, be sure to reserve Sunday afternoon, December 4, at 5:00 p.m. for the LMC Delegation Caucus, a meeting that has traditionally preceded the final policy adoption session for the conference delegates. The delegation meeting will be held in the Hynes Convention Center. Room location and other information will be available at a later date. GtTY of MOUND 534.! MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55354 (612) 472-1155 Mr. Ed Shukle, Administrator City of Mound :~ ,',~y~od Road Mound, Minnesota 55~64 3uly 2~, 1988 Dear Mr. ShuKle: I am writing to cordially invite you to the fourth informational luncheon for administrators and counci!memoers ~n the West Lake Minnetonka area. Over the past two years, officials from the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Waste Control, anO Hennepin County Highway Department nave joined us for these informal, yet very Oeneficial, luncheons. Representatives from the Hennepin Regional Park District will join us at our ~pcoming meeting. A short presentation, with a question anO answer session, regarding such topics as new and expanaeo Hennepin Park Services, new park areas, goals of Park 8card, future capital improvements in this area, district structure, etc., will take place. Those olanning to attena are: Shirley 8chine, Chairperson and Oistrict Commissioner Doug Bryant, New Park Superintendent Neil WeOer, District Commissioner The luncheon is set for 11:45 AM to 2:00 PM on August 10, 1988. It will be held at ti~e Minnetonka Country CluO in the New Room There is a cost of $3.00 per person. ' The Mayor, Administrator, Clerk, anO Council of t'e follo~ing communities are invited: Deepnaven Excelsior I4ound Greenwood Long Lake Orono Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista S~. 8onifacius Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay We look forward to seeing you on the 10th of August. Laurie at 476-6010, by August 5th. Please R.S.V.P. to Sincerely, CITY OF MOUND - CO-SPONSOR ,.->f ......t., , 1' I/ L,.L-*. "'2)"-"t(-',--!.-i Ir '-'/,'-- o bnUKle, C~ty Adminfstrator ES/RLJ:tdv McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOC., INC. - CO-SPONSOR RoOert L. 3diner i/ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 822 South Third Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 554'15 Phone: [6~2) 3z~8-6846 Municipal Weed Inspectors Bill Brenna ~ Date: August 1, 1988 Subject: USDA Info on Purple Loosestrife I have just received the enclosed information on purple loosestrife from the Department of Agriculture. 'Hopefully it contains some answers to the many questions you are being asked in regards to ~m~-ple loosestrife. If you have any additional questions, please call me at 348-3059. BB:tma Enclosure HENNEPIN COU N'[V an equal oppodunity employer ANSWERS TO SOME COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS USING RODEO~-IERBICIDE FOR PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE MANAGEMENT IN MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN What is purple Ioosestrife: Purple Ioosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) is an exotic aquatic plant that rapidly multiplies and displaces native Am wetland plants with no natural checks or balances in North America. el What effect does purple Ioosestrife have on wildlife? Purple Ioosestrife has little or no value for wildlife including songbirds, muskrats, ducks, and northern pike. Ag Waterfowl shun wetlands dominated by IooseStrife and overall waterfowl and wildlife production is decreased as Ioosestrife invades. el A! What are the economic effects of a purple Ioosestrife invasion? More frequent, costly, clean out of drainage ditches essential to farmers, landowners, and roadside managers also lower land and resale values where Ioosestrife is established. Q. Does Rodeo Aquatic Herbicide control purple Ioosestrife? A, When applied at the correct rate and time of year Rodeo controls purple Ioosestrife roots and all. Seeds in the soil will not be controlled by Rodeo. ~Q. What is Rodeo Aquatic r~erD~c~ae. AW Rodeo herbicide is a chemical product, glyphosate, used tc control most emerged vegetation encountered in aquatic management. It is water soluble, biodegradable, has no soil residual activity and is essentially non-toxic to humans and wildlife. Various formulations of the active ingredient in Rodeo are commonly used by farmers, foresters, homeowners, highway maintenance professionals and others to solve weed control problems. Rodeo is specially formulated for use in aquatic areas. Q. Where can Rodeo Aquatic Herbicide be used? A, Rodeo can be used to control undesireable emergent vegetation in all types of water bodies. This includes lakes, rivers, streams, ponds, seeps, irrigation and drainage ditches, canals, reservoirs, and similar sites. Be sure to check with local regulatory agencies to obtain proper aquatic application permits. Q. What restrictions are there on water treated with Rodeo? A, There is no restriction on the use of Rodeo treated water for irrigation, recreation, or domestic puposes. Q. How does Rodeo Herbicide work? A. Rodeo is applied directly to the green foliage of the plant. The chemical ingredient slowly moves through the plant and into the roots and effectively stops most plants from growing. Visual effects such as yellowing and eventually browning will appear 2-4 weeks after treatment. The mode of action occurs only in plant species; Rodeo is practically non-toxic to most animals and the environment. GU Al Does Rodeo stay in the soil? Any Rodeo that makes its way to the soil, sticks very tigltly to the soil and will not move off the area tha' has been treated. Micro-organisims in the soil break down the ingredients in Rodeo into naturally occurinr~ compounds. This is commonly called biodegradation. Because of Rodeo's adhesion to soil particles it is very unlikely that it will make its way to groundwater. Q. Who has cleared Rodeo Herbicide for use? A, · The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has cleared Rodeo for use in aquatic vegetation manage- ment. The clearance was given after extensive review of environmental information and data covering public and regulatory issues. The active ingredient in Rodeo is cleared for many other purposes, including uses by farmers and homeowners. Q! What about state agencies? Both the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and the Minnesota Depart~-~ent of Natural Recourses Aquatic Plant Management Program have cleared Rodeo for use in aquatic areas. Gl Does Rodeo Herbicide hurt plants and vegetation surrounding the treated area? Rodeo will only eliminate plants that are directly sprayed. It must be in direct contact with a plant to work. A! As long as desirable vegetation is not directly sprayed, it will not be harmed. Rodeo has no soil activity. Does Rodeo Herbicide create vapors or odors that can drift from treated 'area? Al No, Rodeo is non volatile and odorless. It will not vaporize or drift from leaves of the treated vegetation after application. Users of Rodeo should always follow label instructions to minimize the potential for spray itself to drift dudng application. Will Rodeo sprayed on vegetation hurt individuals, pets, or wildlife? No, the results from extensive testing conducted by Monsanto and outside agencies for the Environmental At Protection Agency (EPA) indicated that at levels applied to treated sites, there is little potential for this product to harm individuals, pets or wildlife. Q..Should individuals or animals be kept Off the sprayed area? A, No re-entry waiting interval is required when Rodeo is used to treat a site. However, after receiving an application, the spray should be allowed to dry before re-entering treated areas. As with any chemical, any unnecessary contact should be avoided. Where Can l Purchase Rodeo Aquatic Herbicide? All Androc Products Incorporated 1418 5th Street South Hopkins, Minnesota (612) 938-4777 Rodeo®is a registered trademark of Monsanto Company No. 2/July, 1988 }..':'THE The newsletter of the DNR's Purple Loosestrife Program Research ~ Drought Plans Accelerates Spread A coordinated multi-agency reseach project on purple loosestrife is planned for this summer. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Purple Loosest,-i£e Program, University of Minnesota Extension, Hennepin Parks, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources along with Dow Chemical Company and Monsanto are cooper- ating to evaluate several treatments to control loosestrife. The project participants will be measuring the effectiveness of treatment, timing, and rates along with the effects of certain treatment methods on nontarget vegetation. Rodeo aquatic herbicide, aquatic formulations of 2,4-D, and Garlon- 3A will be the primary herbicides evaluated. Garlon-3A will be under an Experimental Use Permit (EUP) from the EPA because DOW As in the mid-1970s, this year's drought conditions are enhancing the spread of loosestrffe in Minnesota. Across the state, loosestrife seedlings are covering newly exposed shore- lines. Sites where last year only a few mature plants grew now are home to (ANC) sign. (A reduced version of the temporary, yellow paper sign is shown here). These signs will be distributed with all ANC permits issued for loosestrife control. They will also be available upon request to anyone who is spraying looscstrife on upland sites where permits are not required. thousands and sometimes millions of tn'st-year loosestrife plants. Notice product for aquatic sites. '~::~ .... i'"'~ Information ~ available ~i signs are New informational sir~s are now available to use at looses~fe control ~;' sites in conjuction with the required l};ili ...................... orange Aquatic Nuisance Control PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE CONTROl. SITE is in the process of registering the ,,~,,,~,~, nepin ~.,~,~ Parks Mature plant (3 to 5+ years) Young plant (l to 2 years) ~;~:~::~::~?:~:~:~I~ Loosestr,fe . Seedling ~{~ Research in -~ ~ ~::~::~ Hen During the spring of 1987, the Suburban Hennepin Regional Pa~k District (Hennepin Parks) received a $33,000 grant from the Metropolitan Council for a three-year study of purple Ioosestrife. This study was designed to document the incidence and rate of spread of Iooscsu'ife in Hennepin Parks, evaltmte new control continued page The Purple Loosesmfe Program is administered by the Section el Ecological Se~ices, Division of Fish and WildHe. Minn. DNR 18¢,3 Wear the Warning! Wherever you go you can tell Mirmesotans about the loosestHfe threat with a color silk.screened No- Loosestrife T. shirts produced by the Society of Wetland Scientists. These shirts are tan, 50-50 cotton-poly blend with a green and magenta loosestrife plant covered by a red "null" symbol over the plant. The common and latin names are written above and below the plant Below is an order form if you'd like to purchase some shins and hand out to control crews, lake association members, or just to wear yourself. Nme: Address: city, state, zip code Il 'Phone: ( ) Number of shirts of each size: Youth Adult __S __M L XL__XXL (34-36) (38.40) (42-44) (46-48) (50-52) All t-shirts are $8 each plus $2 shipping and handling. Make your check out to: Society of Wetland Scientists-North Central and send it and the order form to: Teri Sardinas, 1023 Como Aveneue, St. Paul, bin 55103. ~ Loose, Suggested Reading The U.S. Fish and Willdife Service has recently published a Fish and Wildlife Research report titled "Spread, Impact and Control of Purple Loosestrde ( L ythrum sali- caria) in North American Wetlands." The 55-page report reviews the origin, uses, history of spread, and ecology of loosesttife on the North American continent. The information as well as photographs can be quite smrding to those not familiar with this insidious exotic plant. The regional usF&ws office has a limited number of these reports available. If you would like to request an individual copy, write to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Purple Loosestrife Coordinator, Federal Buildling, Fort Shelling, Twin Cities, MN 55111 Slide shc)w available A slide show tided "Purple Loosestrife: A New Threai to Our Wetlands and Wildlife" is now available for loan from the DNR's Bureau of Information and Education. The 80- slide program comes with a complete narrative and takes about 20 minutes to present. The show describes the problems assiciated with purple loosestrife, the non-native plant, which is invading wetlands and displacing native plan~ and wildlife. Identification of Ioosestrife, control techniques, the history of loosestrife's spread and a description of the DNR Purple Loosestrife Program are included. If you'd tike to borrow the slide show, request Show # 526 from the Department of Natural Resources, In- formation and Education Film Library, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, $flq 5515540046. Tel. (612) 296- 0899. ~z ~:~~~'~ On the LOOSE How to Purple Loosestrife Prepared by the Purple Loosestrife Program Ecological Services The 1987, designation of pUrPle loosestfife as a noxious weed in Minnesota has created much demand for information about the most effective purple loosestrife conrol methods. This summary sheet is intended to provide private landowners, agricultural inspectors and resource managers with the most current approved control techniques as well as guidelines for obtaining the necessary permits. Presently, only a small pereenmge of the suitable habitat for loosestrife in Minneosta is infested. However, once loosestrife invades an area, it can spread and become unmanagable very quickly. Loosestrife is currently found in most of the state's 87 counties and hundreds of separate populations have been reported, yet most loosetrife colonies are still small and can be managed with known control measures. Control strategy for smaU loosestrife poplations should consist of aggressive eradication of existing plants. In addition, wetlands that do not currently have loosestrde need to be monitored, to ensure that any invasion is detected early. In areas where loosestfife has invaded wetlands or lakeshores having multiple owners, coordinated control efforts should be inititated on a bay-wide, lake-wide or water- shed-wide basis. Such coordinated control effov, s should result in more efficient control, fewer applications for aquatic nuisance control permits, and savings in total treatment costs. Current methods for wiping out large, dense populations of loosestrffe are not totally effective. Mechanical control methods are ineffective, and the herbicide most efffective for killing loosestrife is non-selective. Broadcast spraying of non-selective herbicides kills all the vegetation and may increase loosestrife density because of seed gemina- tion following the removal of competing perennial vegetation. Re'alistically, the long-term control of large Vopulafions may require biological controls and better herbicides, but the development of these techniques is at least several years away. In the meantime, we need to conmn Ioosestrife and minimize seed production as part of our present control objectives. Resource managers and researchers across the county have tried many control tech- niques, and have found that improper control methods can often create a worse [oosetrife problem. Therefore, we are providing infor- mation about both successful and unsuccessful control methods. Ig?S' Hand removal is not an effective way to remove older plants or large numbers of plants. However, relatively young (1- to 2- year-old) and isolated plants can be pulled by hand. Pulling is easiest when water level is at or slightly above the ground surface. Roots of older plants should be "teased' loose with a fork rather than dug out with a shovel. This will minimize the number of roots that break off and may re-sprout. Take care that you minimize soil disturbance, because this provides a site for seed germination. At the same time, remove the entizc rootstock, since regeneration can occur from the remaining pieces of root. Pulled plants must be removed from the wetland became they can re-root. In Minne- soul where purple loosestrife is a noxious weed, the plants must be disposed of appropri- ately after they have been dug up. In most instances, burning the stems and rootstocks is the best disposal method. Note: DNR aquatic nuisance control permits are not required tbr hand pulling (mechanical control) of purple loose.strife. Cutting does reduce stem numbers in the short-term. However, many repeated cuts are needed for long-term results, and cutting may never totally eliminaate the loosestrife at a site. If shoots are cut into pieces where they can float to new areas, these pieces can root. Thus, cutting can actually enhance spread. Cutting and removing the flower stalks to eliminate the season's seed production helps. However, cutting is not generally a recom- mended control method. Burning loose, strife stands is difficult because fu-e will not spread in most stands. Flooding is generally ineffective on e,stab- lished plants, although repeated or prolonged flooding in turbid waters reduces loosestrife vigor. The water level at mOSt loosesu, ife sites cannot be manipulated anyway.. Where it can, cirawndowns provide new exposed mud flats for the loosestrife u3 germintate and raising water levels can spread the seed to new areas. To date, the most effective, efficient and least costly method for conu-olling Ioosestrife in situations where the plants can't be pulled is with spot applications of herbicide. Glyphosate herbicides are very effective for killing loosestrife. Glyphosate is available under the trade names Roundup, Accord and Rodeo--all manufactured by Monsanto. This herbicide is completely nonselective; how- ever, selective application techniques allow it to be used effectively with minimum damage to desirable plants. Glyphosate is taken up through the leaves or young stems and will kill any plant that it contacts on these tissues. Therefore, you need to treat only the Ioosestrife and avoid the valuable wetland plants such as cattails. GlyphOsate is biodegradable, very short- lived and becomes quickly inactivated ',~ :'.ch. contacts moist soil. However, the ,~se Roundup is not allowed over open we'.er because it contains a wetting agent ~a~ not been approved for use on aquatic sites. Only Rodeo may be used at aquatic It must be mixed with Ortho X-77 Spreader, or another approved wetting agent. Roundup, which is useful in any situation (except public waters) where there is no standing water at the time of spraying, is readily available at most feed and garden stores. Rodeo is only sold in large quantifies and by very few dealers. If you need to control purple looscstrife in standing water, contact the DNR's Purple continued on next page Loosestrife Program for help in obtaining the herbicide or for a current list of dealers and licenesed commercial applicators. The overall objective when controlling purple loosestrife with glyphosate herbicide is to spray very carefully so the loosestrife plant~ are selectively removed but the surrounding desirable vegetau~:n are not harmed. If this can be accomplished most of the loosestrife will be removed. The relatively small "holes" in the vegeation will be quickly filled by other perennials precluding the establishment of loosestrife seedlings. Fol- low-up treatment for at least one more season is necessary since some plants will be missed, new seedlings will sprout, and a few plants will survive the initial treatment. Improper mixtures and careless application, however, inevetibly kills mom surrounding vegetation and leads to the establishment of more loosestrife seedlings. Broadleaf herbicides (2,4-D based) can be effective on loose, strife, especially if used in late May or early June. They have the advantage of not harming monocot species, which are the dominants in most wetland types. The disadvantage of treating early in the season is that loosestrife plants are difficult to locate because they are not in flower. WHEN--Plan on spot spraying in late summer (July 15-September 1) because the herbicide is most effective then. Although the plants will be blooming and will set some seed, seed viability will probably be cut in half by spraying. If plants are already well- established a~ the site, there is probably already a high density of viable seeds in the soil.. PERMITS--Determine whether the site has standing water. If there is, use Rodeo. Minnesota Statu~ require that any application (whether by commercial applicators, private individuals, Agricultrual inspectors or resource managers) of herbicides to Minnesota public waters requires an Aquatic Nuisance Control (ANC) permit from the DNR. (See permit requirements) SPRAYERS--Use only a plastic or stainless steel sprayer. Using clean water, check your sprayer for leaks and adjust the nozzle to provide a spray of fine droplets. Do not adjust to a mist, since a fine mist is likely to drift and kill desirable vegetation. WEATHER--Glypbosate works best in mid- to late summer. Spray on a sunny day when rain is not expected for at least 8 hours, preferably 24 hours, and spray during mid- morning to afternoon (wait until the dew is off and the plants are dry). Do not spray on a windy day. MIXING--Read the label on the herbicide you purchase. SPRAYING--Wet about 1/4 to 1/2 of the leaf areas of each plant (a "clump" of loosestrife is an individual plant), taking care to avoid spraying other species. Often loosestrife is taller than the surrounding vege- tation, so you can spray the top of the plant. Many plants require only one brief squirt of herbicide. For larger plants, keep in mind the 1/4 to 1/2 of the total leaf area rule. PLANNING-Work through the colony starting at one side and backing away from the area you have sprayed to avoid walking ti,rough the wet herbicide. For larger patches, tie some bright-clored flags to tall plants to mark the boundaries of the areas that have been treated. SIGNS-If the treatment is carried out on Minnesota public waters, you need to post Aquatic Nuisance Control (ANC) treatment signs in the treated area to serve notice to anyone who may use the area for water recreation. There is a 24-hour restriction on swimming in water near treated areas. ANC signs (orange) and Loosetrife Control Site signs (yellow) are provided by the DNR when the ANC permit is issued. Informational signs should be posted along with ANC signs in an approximate ratio of 1 sign for every 2 ANC signs. RE-VIST--Re-visit the wetland each year to kill the few surviving plants and to prevent reinvasion. Also watch any areas where soil disturbances or exposed mud flats may provide a site for seedling establishment. Region 1 2155 Bizchmont Beach Rd. N.E. Bemidji 1VaN 56601 (218) 755-2265 Region 2 1201 E. Highway 2 Grand Rapids MN 557~4 (218) 327-~.409 If purple loosestrife is located in or along a water course, lake basin or wetland, a permit is probably required for control work. An aquatic nuisance control (ANC) permit is required for chemical control of loosestrife within the boundaries of the state's protected waters (DN~R Commissioner's Order No. 2210). When treating loosestrife, there is no fee for this permit (DNR Commissioner's Order No. 22~A). The mechanical control of loosestrife, such as hand pulling or curing, does not requite an ANC permit even if within the limits of protected waters. If you aren't sure of the watercourse, lake basin or wetland, contact one of these sources: county auditor at the county courthouse, county Soil and Water Conservation District, DNR Division of Waters regional office. If you know the legal description (township, range and section) for the property in ques- tion, you can contact Sandy Fecht at the DNR central office (612) 297-2401. The boundary of Minnesota's protected waters is delineated by the ordinary high water mark (OH'W). The OHW is the "highest watcr level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the land.scape." For basins, the OHW usually mark the point where the native vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. For streams and rivers, the OHW is the "elevation at the top of the bank of the channel." In other cases, a permit is required for chemical control of loosestrife on the waterward side of the 0I-~. Applications for an ANC permit may be made by any riparian owner on that body of water or by a representative of any group of riparian owners. If you'd like more information or a permit application, contact: Section of Ecological Services, Division of Fish and V~Idife, Box 25, DNR Building, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Past, ~.[N 55155-4025, or contact the Re- gional Fisheries Office at the adctress listed at left. Region.3 Region 4 Region $ Region 6 1601 Minn. Drive Box 756 2300 Silv~ Creek Rd 1200 Warner Rd. Box 648 Highway 15 Sou~ N.E. St. Paul, MN 55106 Bra[nerd, MN 56401 New Ulm, MN 56073 Rochester, MI~ 55901 (612) 296-3572 (218) 828-2506 (507) 285-7176 (507) 285-7176 cides in areas used for drink- supercede all these guldllnes. AMOUNT OF LOOSESTRIFE Site 1-20 plants/ 20-100 plants / 100-l,000 plants/ 75-100% ctmr~-'tlrtstles: acm acr~ acre coverage Wallmble m' Hand remove Same as left o~ Spot-spray Rodeo Bmadcast- drtvable planLs and des~oy selectively spray or broadcast-spray spray selective ,tI plan~ parts, w/Rodeo, selective herbicide, herbicide such ! as 2ta-D. Acce~ibk Sam~ as ~l)ov¢ 'Selectively" by bo~t m' sci,:lively spot-spray with Same as above. Same as above. spot.spray w/ Rodeo. Rodeo. Aerial broad- Inaccemlbk by 'Selectively' Aerial spray cast-spray a with selective Same as left. ground or water broadcast-spray selective w/hezbicide, herbicide, herbicide. Sensitive site Wick apptica- Wick applica- Same as left. Cut, r~move (e.g-, rare ptants) tion of Rodeo 6on of Rodeo and destroy all or Roundup. flower stalks. Hand rtmove Cut, r~move and Same as left. Same as left. Cbemkal u_~ plants and des~'oy flower prohibited destroy all plant stalks pa,La. Question E!i Summary of and Answer Inventory S h e e t A one page question and answer sheet has been prepared by Monsanto Company to answer questions com- monly asked by the public about purple loosestrife and its control using the aquatic herbicide Rodeo (glypho- sam). This sheet, reviewed by the DNR's Purple Loosestrife Program, provides simple yet accurate informa- tion about the use of Rodeo to treat loosestrife in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Copies of the answer sheets are available to commercial applicators, resource managers, or' the general public. Contact the Purple Loosestrife Program for more information. We have recently completed a statewide database of loosestrife loca- tions reported in 1987. County Agri- cultural inspectors, DNR staff, MnDOT staff and members of the public reported over 500 separate looses~ife infested sites across the state last year. Purple loosestrife is widely dis- tributed in Minnesota. Sites were reported in 67 of the state's 87 counties. Lakeshores, marshes and roadsides are are the types of sites where loosestrilre is most commonly reported. The exact number of acres requir- ing control cannot be determined yet, Loosestrife :,::~:~:i:i:i::~ Poster Conservation groups and thc Purple Loosestrife Program are working together to publish a colored poster [o increase the public's aware- ness of purple loosetrife. This poster will be a companion to the existing "Purple Loosestrife Alert" brochure presently available. We will begin distributing this poster later this summer to nature centers, Soil and Water Conservation Offices, schools, refuges and other appropriate locations. but we do know that the total acreage of all sites with at least one loosestrife colony exceeds 15,000 acres. fe Reports of loosestrife sites should be sent to the Purple Loos- estrife Program or, s;andardized loosestrife report forms. New postcard-sized, pre- addressed, postage-paid report forms are now available from the Purple Loosestrife pro~ram. Purple Loosestrife Report Form (Please fill out one form for each area with Ioosestrife plants) NAME: Send me more repart forms. ADDRESS: Yes ~ How many ~ No ZIP PHONE: ( ) LOCATION OF PURPLE LOOSESTRIFE Locality ( ie. lake, city ): County: Township: Nearest Road Intersection: TYPE OF AREA (chec~ one) 1-marsh or wettand ~ 5-meadow or pasture 2-pond or lake [] 6.roadS~Oe U 3-stream or river n 7-o~her (specih~) [] 4-ditch [] NUMBER OF PLANTS (check one) ~ess than 20 [] 20-99 [1 100-999 ['] more than 1,000 Diagram (shows roads, distances, and outline of the Iocsestrile patch}. If you would like ~ to send you some report forms, write to: Purple Loosestrife Program, Section of Ecological Services, Division offish and Wildlife, Box 25,500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4025. on the .oos£ 21511 i~:5~i Hennepln Parka/ ~:~ from page methods and document the impact these control methods have on the surrounding vegetation. During the summer of 1987, all 'of the purple loose, strife infestations within the parks were mapped using both ground and aerial observava- tions. Loosestrife was found to exist in nine of the 19 parks managed by Hennepin Parks. Four of these parks have small isolated infestations that can be controlled with spot applica- tions of Rodeo herbicide. Five have infestations of looses~fe too large to control with spot application. We are testing a number of possible control methods for these large infestations. A series of test plots have been set up in stands of purple loosestrife to test the effective- ness of different herbicides for large- scale control. Before and after the herbicidal treatment of these plots, all of the plant species present are listed with their estimated percent cover. Thus, the hexbicides's effect on loosestrife and all the surrounding nontarget vegetation can be deter- mined. Destroying large areas of loose, s~fe without hurting nearby vegetation is difficult. We hope our research will r~veal a herbicide or application method that will be selective only for loosestrife. Another possible control method being investigated is a progression of treatments. F~rst a very dense stand of loosestrife will be sprayed with Rodeo, a non-selective herbicide. The dead vegetation will then be burned off and the site replanted with various native wetland plants. Thc goal of this method is to restore plant communities from a monotypic stand of loosestrife back to the diverese wetland ecosystem it once was. If these studies show promise for loosestrife control, Hennepin Parks will start using the control methods throughout the park district. -Tom Hollenh~rst Purple Loosestrife Coordinator Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District 3800 Count)' Road 24 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 provided by the Leglsiatb', Com. The Purple Loosestrlfe Program Section of Ecological Services Division of Fish and Wildlife Minnesota DN~R Box 25 500 Lafayc t:e Road St. Paul, MN 55155-~025 Tel.. (612) 296-2835 Jay Rendall, coordinator. Newsletter design: Tom Dickson DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 822 South Third Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, Minnesota 554' 5 Phone: [612) 348-6846 August 3, 1988 TO Hennepin County Municipalities and Solid Waste Collectors and Disposal Facilities Subject: PROPOSED TIP FEE AT HENNEPIN C OUNTY~TE FACILITIES Hennepin County will hold a public hearing August 25, 1988, regarding the proposed tip fee it will charge for solid w~ste disposal in Hennepin County. ~nclosed is a copy of the official Notice of the Public Hearing. A $75.00 per ton fee is proposed by the County for 1989. The fee is designed to cover all solid waste transfer, processing, recycling, and composting costs. A~proximately sixty percent of the tip fee will go to cover the cost~ of the waste-to-energy facilities, including both the mass-burn plant in downtown Minneapolis and the NSP-RDF facility in Elk River, as well as the costs of disposing of residue and ash from these tw~ facilities and landfilling non-processible and excess waste. Twenty-two percent of the tip fee will be used to pay for the construction and operation of the transfer stations, which transfers the solid ~ste to processing facilities. The County helps cities in the County fund their recycling programs, and approximately 16% of the tip fee will be utilized for these grants, for operating the County yard-waste-composting facilities and for the recycling portion of the transfer stations. Two percent of the tip fee will be used for household-hazardous-w~ste management and administration costs. The County desires to establish the 1989 tip fee as soon as possible to give waste haulers time to incorporate these increased tip fees into their 1989 rate schedules. It is estimated that the tip fee would go into effect about June l, 1989. The County Board will establish the effective date a minimum of 60 days ahead of time. Please contact Dave Winter at 348-4491 if you have questions or need more information. HENNEPIN COUNT'",' an ¢ctuol Ol~pOrtunibF cmrioyer ~ (Official Notice) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON ESTABLISHMENT OF A SOLID ~ASTE TIPPING FEE FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY Notice is hereby given that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners will hold a public hearing in the County Board Room, 24th Floor, Mennepin County Government Center, 300 South Sixth Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487, on Thursday, August 25, 1988, at 10:00 a.m. The purpose of the public hearing is to seek testimony on establishment of a solid waste tipping fee for 1989 of $75.00 per ton. The County Board resolution establishing the effective date will be adopted a minimum of 60 days before the effective date. It is currently estimated the effective date will be June l, 1989. Anyone wishing to offer testimony either in written or oral form should do so at the public hearing, or by letter directed to the County Board of Commissioners, by August 25, 1988. By order of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. August 2, 1988 File: PUBHRG [ NELSONL] ew righton July 27, 1988 Dear City Official: I wish to extend to you a cordial invitation to attend'tke Lea~'ue of Minnesota Cities Regional Meeting kosted by the City of New Brighton on Monday, September 12 1988 at Robert Lae's (H~y 694 & Silver Lake Road). ' The afternoon program, ~.~._~,inzr_..~ at -';'39 P~M., includes a presen- tation on personnel issues such as hiring, ~[ring, disciplining~ and ~eveioping an affirmative action program. From 3:45 -- ~:00 P.M., there will be two separate roundtables to discuss the aspects of Minnesota's new property tax system and now your cit~3 is progressing with its comparable worth plan. From 5:00 - 5:30, LMC will provide legislators with a spe~ slide presentation on the "State of the Cities", to inciu~e the latest information about the financi~l statu~ ~f M~nneso~a cities such as trends in spen~.j.n,-j~ property taxes, e~c.. F!ease per- sonally contact yuur legislators t.D u~;e them tc - · . ~tte~,.(~ so you can discuss these critical .~ =" :~t ..... the s~.Ide presentation. We wi]_.l be serving "'-~ dln,,_r at S:15 P.M.; the evening agenda wil= focz,s on legislative issues of importance to municipalities. City officials will be asked for in'out for the development of the Leaque's 1989 City Policies and ~; '~'= ..... ~ ........ Legisiat'2.ve tion,. To round out the program, we wi~ ~ be hearing Legislators and Legislative Candidases. To make reservations for your city, please reCurn the enclosed registration fcrm as soon as possible. In case of cancellations. please notify Pat Lindquist (633-15qq% by ~ --- Your citv w~qq be =:'- - .... ~ ~=uisQay, September .... ~=ed ~or those whc did not attend and did not cancel by the aforementioned date. Sincerely, CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON Rober5 J. Eenke Mayor RJB:p!:jr DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL MARKET HOUSE 289 EAST 5TH STREET C~LEPApUL~ MINNESOTA 55101 HONE: (612) 296-7641 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY August 4, 1988 Mayor and City Council City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 1988 Dear Mayor and Council Members: On 8-3-88, the police and fire departments responded to a tragic emergency call on Monmouth Ave. First arriving police officers found a house engulfed in flames which the fire department controlled very quickly. Search and rescue personnel discovered a badly burned body in the house. The police officer's and fire fighter's professionalism and teamwork in handling this gruesome and complicated scene must be commended. Every move they made was a textbook perfect example of ho~r to correct- ly preserve and document a death scene. Also, the willingness of every person to physically pitch in and clear out evidence made the State Fire Marshal's job an easier one on that hot day. We would also like to give some special thanks to Police Chief Len Harrell for handling the media and for making some extra effort to see that evidence needed to identify the body was delivered in a timely manner. Please share our thanks with the police officers and fire fighters. Sincerely, Denise De Mars Ron ~Rahman Deputy State Fire Marshals Investigation Division AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' ....~