The URL can be used to link to this page

1989-02-14 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA A G E N D ~ MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Pledge of Allegiance. Approve the Minutes of the January 24, 1989, Regular Council meeting. Pg. 341-347 Request for an extension of Resolution #88-96, Leo D. & Neila M. Clifford, 3185 Priest Lane Pg. 348-351 Renewal of Municipal Insurance Program - Earl Bailey, R. L. Youngdahl & Associates. Pg. 352-371 Proposal to include Worker's Compensation Insurance for elected officials - Earl Bailey, R. L. Youngdahl & Associates. (Refer to Earl's letter in Item #4) Pg. 352-355 1988 Department Head Ann~al Reports. - Geno Hoff, Street Superintendent - Jim FaCkler, Park Director - Don Bryce, Fire Chief Pg. 372-378 Pg. 379-391 Pg. 392-396 Approval of Final Payment Request - 1989 Shoreline Protection Project - $22,660.00.. Pg. 397-400 Resolution relating to Council/Staff responsibilities. Pg. 401-402 10. An Ordinance Adding Section 260 to the City Code Creating an Economic Development Commission and Establishing its Duties. Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector. Pg. 403-407 Pg. 408 11. Comments on dredge application #89-6291 from the DNR for Harrisons Bay: Driftwood Shores, Outlot 2, Three Points Blvd. Pg. 409-417 12. Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present· 13. 14. Request for Maintenance Permit on Commons {or John Dow, 4994 Manchester Road. Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement for the Loan of PBT'S (Portable Breath 'Testers) from the Department of Public Safety. Pg. 418-424 Pg. 425-429 Page 337 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into the Southwest Metro Task Force Joint Powers Agreement. License Renewals: - Garbage - Cigarette - Commercial Dock Set Date for Public Hearing on Proposed Street Vacation of Unused Road Right-of-Way for Clyde Wallin, 2003 Arbor Lane. (SUGGESTED DATE: March 15, 1989) Payment of Bills. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: Pg. 430-435 Pg. 436 Pg. 437 Pg. 438-454 ae Ce De Ee Fe Ge' He January 1989 Department Head Monthly Report. Pg. 455-488 Letter from John Norman, Finance Director, to Mr. Dale Reimer regarding water billing issue. Pg. 489-490 Letter dated_January 23, 1989, from Mary A. Smith, Director of Public Affairs, Triax Cablevision regarding centralization of Triax Offices. Pg. 491 Letter dated January 31, 1989, from Triax Cablevision regarding 1988 Franchise Fee. Pg. 492 Per Mayor Smith's "Letter to the Editor" published in The Laker and Sailor February 6, we received some letters regarding the City Council's action on the Eurasian Water Milfoil weed. Pg. 493-497 L.M.C.D. mailings since the last Agenda packet. Pg. 498-504 Invitation from Senior Community Services, Hopkins, for you to attend a Volunteer Recognition Party on Wednesday, March 15, 1989, 4-6 P.M., at the Eisenhower Community Center, 1001 Highway 7, Hopkins. Please let Fran know by March 9th, if you wish to attend. Pg. 505 Metropolitan Council's "State of the Region 1989". will be held Wednesday, February 22, 1989, at the Hotel Sofitel in Bloomington, from 1 P.M. to 8 P.M. If you are interested in attending, please let Fran know by Monday, February 13th. Pg. 506-508 Page 338 Je Ke ne Ted Fox, Lakewinds, has sent excerpts of the Tax Court ruling on three condominium units he owns at Lakewinds. We have provided the full rulings of the Tax Court for his 1986 and 1987 cases. Pg. 509-531 Letter from Frank Livingston on his opinions regarding government debt and spending. Pg. 532-544 REMINDERS: 1) The first Committee of the Whole meeting established at the 1-31-89 Goal Setting Session is scheduled for Tuesday, February 21, 1989, beginning at 7:30 P.M. No written Agenda packet will be sent out for this meeting. You should bring your issues with you to the meeting to discuss. No formal action will be taken on any issues. 2) The March 14th regular meeting has been rescheduled to Wednesday, March 15. LMCD's monthly report from Tom Reese, City of Mound Representative. Pg. 545-547 Page 339 9 January 24, 1989 ~INUTES - ~OUI~D CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 24t 1989 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 24, 1989, at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ah- rens, Liz Jensen,'Phyllis Jessen, and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr, City Clerk Fran Clark, city Attorney Curt Pearson, and Building Official~ Jan Bertrand and the following interested citizens: Dale Reimer, William Hibbs, Nancy Davies Lemon and Steve Erickson. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten- dance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MINUTES MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to approve the minutes of the ~anuary 7, 19.89, Special ~eeting and the Januar~ 10, 1989, Regular Meeting as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS city Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was $2,538.01. The Mayor opened'the Public Hearing~ Mr. Dale Reimer, 4639 Manchester Road, stated that this bill was incurred when his ex-wife lived in the house. The City Clerk explained that the bill stays with the property. The City Attorney explained that if the bill is not paid it will be assessed against the property and put on the taxes. Mr. Reimer has signed a contract to pay the bill. Mr. Reimer stated he did not understand why the City let the bill go for 18 months before it got on the turn-off list. The City Manager stated he would research this and get baCk to Mr. Reimer. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing. The Council asked that Mr. Reimer's bill be removed from the list. Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: 10 January 24, 1'989 RESOLUTION 89-13 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,282.33 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has in' terviewed all 7 candidates and is recommending the appointment of Jerry Clapsaddle and the reappointment of William Thal to the Planning Commission. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution.: RESOLUTION #89-14 RESOLUTION TO REAPPOINT WILLIAM THAL AND APPOINT JERRY CLAPSADDLE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR 3 YEAR TERMS - TERMS EX- PIRE DECEMBER 31, 1991 The vote was unanimously .in favor. Motion carried. REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY SIGN PERMIT - IND. SCHOOL DIST. 277 - "SAVE Ta= POOL" PROGRAM The Building Official explained' that the reqUest is for 2 tem- porary signs, one to be a sandwich type (location to be determined), the other will be a wal-1 mount type to be placed be- tween Netka's Building and the attorney's offices. She stated they meet the cr-iteria for a quasi-public use and recommended ap- proval. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Ahrens to approve the sign permit request of Ind. School Dist. %277, for 2 tem- porary signs, one to be a sandwich type (location to be determined), the other ~il} be a wall mount type to be placed between Netka,s BuLldlng and the attorney,s offices. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN ORDER FOR REMOVAL OF A HAZARDOUS BUILDING - 1657 FINCH LAN~ The Building Official explained that the house was owned by a Gladys Larson, who is deceased. The house was sold on a Contract for Deed to William Hibbs who then sold the house on a Contract for Deed to Nancy Davies Lemon. Ms. Lemon cannot transfer 1/2 a tax parcel. There are numerous title problems with the property. The two lots are one tax parcel but the vacant lot title is in the name of Mrs. Larson's husband, who is also deceased. Hen- nepin County Welfare also appears to have a stake in the property. The lot that the house is on is only 3200 square feet and is undersized without the vacant lot. The house is also 11 January 24, 1989 undersized. Mm. Lemon was issued a stop tag in September for work being done on the house without obtaining a building permit. The following hazardous conditions exist at the unoccupied house: 1. Heating plant in fair condition but disconnected; 2. Water heating equipment in poor condition and disconnected; 3. Asphalt' roof shingles in fair to poor condition; 4. Basement walls mostly removed and collapsing; 5. Windows in fair condition; 6. Window sills in poor condition; 7. Chimneys in poor condition and disconnected; 8. Exterior walls in fair to poor condition; 9. Plumbing disconnected with improper piping; 10. Sanitary facilities are disconnected; 11. The building is set upon wooden shoring and not con- nected to the foundation; open excavations surround the collapsing foundations; the building is open to entry and is not secured. 12. Waste lines and water supply lines are frozen and unusable; 13.. Structure la'cks smoke detectors; 14. Electrical lighting and wiring disconnected with a 60 amp electrical service. Mr. Hibbs and Ms..Lemon were present and requested an additional 60 days to allow them time to clear up' the title problems. Ms. Lemon asked if the Council would consider granting her a variance for the undersized lot and undersized house. The City Attorney stated h~ did hot ~hink the title problems could be cleared up in 60 days. The Attorney explained that a variance cannot be applied for because Ms. Lemon is not the fee owner of the property. The Council discussed the problems and decided to move ahead with the Order for Removal. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION %89-15 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN ORDER FOR REMOVAL OF A HAZ- ARDOUS BUILDING AT 1657 FINCH LANE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. REQUEST FOR use OF MOUND BAY PARK FOR WEIGH-IN ONLY ON SATURDAYt JUNE 3t 1989~ MINNETONKA BASS CLASSIC The representative present stated there will be 75 boats involved and they will be weighing,in in 3 flights of 25 each. 12 January 24, 1989 MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to approve a request by the Minnetonka Bass Club for use of Mound Bay Park for a weigh-in only on Saturday, June 3, 1989, the Min- netonka Bass Classic. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. REVIEW OF OFFER FOR PURCHASE OF HOUSE AT 5440 LYNWOOD BLVD. The City Manager explained that an offer has been made for the purchase of the City owned house at 5440 Lynwood Blvd.-The offer is for $75,000. There are some repairs that will have to be made to the' house in order for it to be mortgaged, such as water leakage and electrical. The City would be responsible for these repairs and the estimated cost should not exceed $3,500. The City Attorney has some corrections to make on the Purchase Agree- ment. Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION %89-16 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SALE OF THE HOUSE AT 5440 LYNWOOD BLVD. SUBJECT TO CORRECTIONS IN THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT REQUIRED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY The vote was unanimously in favor. ~ET DATE FOR ~/~-NUAL BOARD OF"REviE~ Motion carried. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to set Tuesday, May 9, 1989 at 6:30 P.M. for the annual Board of Review. The vote was unanimously in favor. "Motion carried. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT There were no comments or suggestions. DISCUSSION: · LAKE MINNETONKA EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND THE.CITY OF MOUND,S POSSIBLE PAR.. TICIPA________TIO~ The City Manager stated that the LMCD is looking to the 14 cities around the Lake to contribute a total of $125,000 toward to the purchase of the machinery needed to combat the weed. Councilmember Johnson suggested that Mound donate $10,000 toward the $550,000 purchase price of the equipment. He suggested several ways to finance the amount he is proposing to donate; the following formula: a. $5.00 to come from each dock permit fee; b. $.25 per person living in Mound to be taken from the General Fund balance; c. $5,000 divided by the number of feet of shoreline' -~ in Mound to give a per foot cost to come from the 13 January 24, t989 General Fund balance; or part could come from the Park Budget, part from Capital Improve- ments and part from the Commons Dock Fund. There was considerable Council discussion about the weed, the fu- ture of the lake, funding by other sources (State 'and Federal). MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to pledge up to $10,000 to the LMCD toward the purchase of the weed harvest- ing equipment and work with the LMCD to develop a formula for other cities to use in determining an amount to pledge. The pledge is subject to the LMCD being able to obtain the remainder of the money to purchase the weed harvesting equipment. The vote was 4 in favor with Councilmember Ah- tens voting nay. Motion carried. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT - LIZ JENSEN,. CITY COUNCIL LIAISON Councilmember Jensen presented and oral report on the Planning Commission Meeting held on January 23, 1989. Minutes will be in the next Council packet. P]tRK COMMISSION REPORT - PHYLLIS JESSEN, CITY COUNCIL LIAISON Councilmember Jessen presented and oral ~eport on the Park Com- mission Meeting held on January 12, 1989. Minutes will be in the next Council packet.' CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION JOINING HENNEPIN COUNTY ECONOMIC' DEVELOPMENT CONSORTIUM The City Manager stated that Mound has been asked to become a member of the. Hennepin County Economic Development Consortium. There is no cost for membership at this time. He stated their mission and goals are as follows: MISSION: Ensure economic growth and increased income for all Mennepin County residents through expanded quality jobs. Goal 1: Aggressively manage and coordinate a public/private economic development effort for the region. Goal 2: Provide a competitive environment for growth in .diversified opportunities, emphasizing existing and new emerging enterprises. Goal 3: Maintain and improve the requisite skills base and foster entrepreneurialism. Goal 4: Maintain and improve the physical infrastructure. 14 January 24, 1989 Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #88-17 RESOLUTION FOR JOINING THE HENNEPIN COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSORTIUM The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~AYMENTOF BILLS MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to aUthorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $236,987.21, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CHANGE MARCH MEETING DATE MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to change the first meeting date in March from Tuesday, March 14, 1989, to Wed- nesda~, March 15, 1989, at 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanim- ousl~ in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: .' A® Public Works Facility Open House - Sunday, January 29, 1989 · '1:00 'P.M.. -.4:00 P.M. 5468 Lynwood'Blvd. Make sure you can be there. We want to have a brief dedica- tion ceremony at 1:00 P.M. or thereabouts where a plaque will be presented by McCombs Frank. Roos to the Mayor, City Council an~ City Staff officially op~ning the new facility. Ail of the necessary arrangements for the event have been made. Be Enclosed are the following items from the LMCD: 1) January 1989 Meeting Schedule. 3) 4) 5) Minutes of the December 28, 1988, Regular Meeting. Public Hearing Notice on Lake Minnetonka Low Water. NeWs release on low water concerns and notice of a meeting to be held on this subject. News.release on Lake Minnetonka Management Plan Study meetings. You received a blue sheet (8 1/2 x 14) last week notifying you of the meeting to be held in Mound on January 19. 6) News release on Lake Minnetonka Winter Rules. De Fe Ge 15 January 24, 1-989 i have requested Tom Reese, I24CD Representative for the city of Mound, to write monthly reports regarding LMCD ac- tivities. I asked him to begin with January so that a report will appear in the February 14 packet. Letter from the Association of Metropolitan'Municipalities (AMM) inviting us to attend a legislative breakfast on Friday, February 3, 1989, at 7:30 A.M. at the Hopkins House. Preliminary 1988 Year End Financial Report as prepared by the Finance Director. Tentative: Goal Setting Session - Tuesday, January 31, 1989, 6:00 P.M. - 10:30 P.M., Lafayette Club with Barbara Arney. This session will involve Mayor, city Council and City Manager. The date has been confirmed. LMCD Agenda for Wednesday, January' 25, 1989, Regular Meet- ing. Lake level, flow and and precipitation sum~.ary for January 1989, as prepare~ by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. MOTION made by Jessen, Seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at 9:40 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk Leo.D. Clifford Neila M. Clifford 3185 Priest.Lane Mound, MN 55364 January 31, 1989 Jan Bertrand Building Official City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: City Council.Resolution No. 88-96 Daer Ms. Bertrand: This follows our conversation of January 31, 1989. We request an extension or renewal of the above-entitled resolution due to problems delaying the closing .of o~r ~ transaction on the property. ~ ~ ~~o D. Clif~o Neila M. Clif~0rd { 0 - 170 June 28, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88-96 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION )~ND SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOTS ? ~ 8v BLOCK 2v HIGHLAND SHORES; PID 23-117-24 34 0080/0081 (3185 PRIEST LANE); P & Z CASE NO. 88-712 WHEREAS, a minor subdivision and setback variance is proposed for Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Highland Shores; PID Number 23-117-24 34 0080/0081 in the manner required for platting of land under city of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 330 and Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statute and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision require- ments contained in Section 330 of the City Code has been filed with the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, said request for waiver has been reviewed .by the. Planning Commission and City Council; and 'WHEREAS, a variance has been applied for to allow a'lot area of 9,9~5 square feet in the R-1 Zoning District.with a lakesh°re setback of 30 feet due to the shallowness of the platted lot; and. WHEREAS, it .has been determined that there are special cir- cumstances affecting said property such that the strict applica- tion of the ordinance would deprived the applicant of .the reasonable use of his land; and that the waiver of the subdivi- sion provisions is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver would not be detrimental to public welfare or injurious to the other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The request of the applicant for a waiver from the provi- sions of Section 330 of the City Code and the request to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as follows: Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Highland Shores; PID Numbers 23-117-24 34 0080/0081 A variance has been applied for and granted to allow a lot area of 9,905 square feet in the R-1 10,000 square 'foot Zoning District and a 30 foot setback from the ordinary high water elevation of Lake Minnetonka which would allow a 20 171 June 2.8, 1988 foot variance to the Zoning Ordinance due to the shallowness of the lot. ae It is hereby granted to permit the subdivision in fol- lowing manner per Exhibit "A": Parcel A: That part of Lot 7, Block 2, Highland Shores, City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Begin- ning at the northwest corner of said Lot.7; 'thence south 2 degrees 30 minutes 08 seconds east 46.73 feet; thence south 4 degrees 00 minutes west 70 feet more or less to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and there ter- minating. The south li~e of said Lot 7 has an assumed bearing of south 8 degrees 30 minutes 50 seconds west Lot area 9,905 square feet. ' Be Parcel B: Lot 8 and that part of Lot 7, Block 2, High- land Shores, City of Mound, Hennepin'County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the following described line: Begin- ning at the .northwest corner .of said Lot 7; thence south 2 degrees 30 minutes 08 seconds east 46.73 feet; thence south 4 degrees 00 minutes west 70 feet more or less to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and there ter- minating. The south line of said Lot 7 has an assumed bearing of south 8 degrees 30. lnutes 50 seconds west. . m' Lot area 11,447 square feet. Upon the further following conditions: Encroachment of concrete slab on Parcel A to be removed, in-ground pool',, and existing cabana and equipment to be removed. A private driveway shall be established from the new building site on Lot 7 with the existing Par- cel A driveway to be discontinued at the northerly 'horseshoe. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit approval prior to developing the remainder of Lot 7. A revised survey shall be submitted at the time of development of Lot 7 to indicate the proposed building setbacks to conform with the 30 foot front yard, 10 foot side yards and 30 foot rear yard to lakeshore plus the normal requirements listed at the time of building permit approval. 172 June 28, 1988 Ce It is determined that the foregoing subdivision will constitute a desirable and stable community development and it is in harmony with adjacent properties. De The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of this resolution to the applicant for filing in the office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of the City after the require- ments listed above have been completed. This lot subdivision is to be filed and'recorded within 180 days of the adoption date of this resolution. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Johnson and seconded by Mayor Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Attest: City Clerk R.L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOCIATES January 26, 1989 City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 10261 Yellow Circle Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota 55343 (612) 933-7488 FAX (612) 933-0916 Attention: Mr. Ed Shukle Dear Ed: It is once again time to renew Mound's various Property & Casualty lines of insurance. I have already placed in your hands, the appropriate Binders for these renewal policies. These Binders will serve as your legal proof of coverages until the policies issue. I am pleased to say that the overall pricing of these policies has come in at a lower premium than last year. This year's bottom line is $139,598, compared to last year's premium of $144,881. This rate reduct- ion is made even more impressive when you consider that the Worker's Compensation payrolls were increased by 5% and a $750,000 Public Works Facility was added to the coverage. Your lower 1989 insUrance'premiums are a direct result of Mound's excellent claim experience and management. Another direct benefit is the $16,000 that you received last year as a dividend on your past L.M.C.I.T. premiums. The League of Minnesota Cities continues to h~ve success with their insurance programs. Therefore, they are able to offer good renewal pricing, availability of otherwise difficult-to-find coverages, and a considerable dividend. It is reassuring to again have a stable ~arket handling Municipality insurance. I am enclosing with this letter, a chart comparing your 1988 premiums, by line of coverage, with your 1989 premiums. Originally, the insurance company quoted the Worker's Compensation premium wrong. John Norman alertly pointed out that the Parks payroll didn't appear on the Worker's Compensation quote.~.~is has been corrected to $48,387, in lieu of $45,956. The $139,~total renewal premium I mentioned early is the accurate figure, in lieu of $137,167. In the ensuing paragraphs I will give you an overview of your 1989 various linesof insurance coverage. The L.M.C.I.T. is continuing to write all lines of coverage for Mound, except for the Liquor Liability and Public Officials' Bonds. These coverages are still in the League's self-insured program. Dividends will continue to be rewarded as long as the program remains profitable to all. Outside of the League's program, insurance coverages for ~municipalities continue to be difficult to find and expensive. Ed Shukle Page 2 January 26, 1989 The Buildings and their Contents continue to be covered on a "Blanket" basis and at replacement cost. The Agreed Amount Endorsement has been added to assure us there will be no coinsurance penalty in the event of a Claim. The pricing in this area has gone down due to the overall good experience of the program. The Crime coverages remain the same, as does this year's pricing.' ~ ...... ~ axp~riance The Equipment pricing has gone do~,~ due to the P~~g~-'s ~ .... The General Liability pricing has increased about 10%, due to a change in the manner that the General Liability premium is derived at. I remind you here, that this Liability coverage is being provided on a "Claims Made" basis now, and has been since February 1, 1987. It is this "Claims Made" form of.policy that causes an automatic increase in the premium for the first five renewals. Another contributing factor to this rise in price is that the E.M.T.'s and Police Professional Liability are now covered under the League's General Liability. This will be the second year of this change. The Auto Insurance premiums are also up about 10% over last year. Even though we are insuring one less vehicle. The cause for this rise appears to be that auto claims are the most commom form of claims. This line of coverage is not very profitable. The Liquor Liability premium has gone down about 20% from last year, while the Liability limits have remained the same. Coupled with last year's 15% savings means that the City has enjoyed a 35% reduction in premiums over the last two years...Another direct reflection on excellent claims experience and management. This coverage continues to be offered through Transcontinental Insurance Company. Transcontinental can offer the City another 10% reduction in premiums if the Liquor store employees attend an accredited Alcohol Awareness Seminar. have checked into some of the particulars of this, and have given that infor- mation to John Norman to investigate. The Public Officials Errors and Omissions Liability policy continues to cover the Mound Council, its committees, and its employees; all while acting within the scope of their duties. The renewal pricing remains the same as last year, and makes it an excellent buy in the current marketplace. This coverage is being carried with the League also, which gives us the advantage of eliminating a potential gap in coverage between this and the General Liability. This coverage contains a $2,500 deductible and continues to cover "Prior Acts." Ed Shukle Page 3 Jamuary 26, 1989 The Police Professional Liability, as mentioned earlier, is now covered under the League's General Liability. There is no longer an additional charge made for this coverage. Coverages continue for use of reasonable force, defense and reimbursement of punitive damages. Ail police personnel and volunteers are covered while acting within the scope of their duties. Worker's Compensation continues to be offered on a self-funded basis by The League through their appointed Third Party Administrator, EBA. .For 1989 ~here has been a change in rates for the various Worker'~ Compensa- tion classifications. Some went up and others went down. The most dramatic rate change to Mound is that the police class went down from $5.99/$100 of payroll, to $4.54. Also, the City's Experience Modification came down from 1.02 in 1988, to .97 in 1989. These two factors have combined to offset an increase in payroll and still give us a substantial premium reduction. As you and I have already discussed, The League is making' available, a 10% rate reduction of the premium for the police and firefighter classi- fications. This reduction is available only if 90%.of each of their departments are non-smokers. Apparently, neither department can qualify at the present. If they can qualify in the future, we can pro-rate the credit for the balance of the policy term. By the way, based on 1989 premiums, the savings would have totalled about $3,000. As a reminder, the City Council ~embers are currently not cov~re~ for Worker's Compensation. The League is making Worker's Compensation coverage available this year for City Council member~ at a very reasonable price. The cost to cover a five-member council in 1989 would be only $530 for the year. I highly recommend that the council take advantage of this. If the council decides to cover themselves under Worker's Compensation, it is advisable that they pass an ordinance. It is easier to keep track of permanently. The recommen- ded wording for the ordinance is : "Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 176.011, subdivision 9, clause 5, the elected officials of the city and those municipal officers appointed for a regular term of office are hereby included in the coverage of the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act." The Public Official's Bonds are renewing at virtually the same price as last year with the same insurance carrier. Once again, the insurance companies that I am using represent the lowest price of all the. competing companies I could find. They are all financially strong. The League obviously continues to be the best game in town price- wise, and coverage-wise. When you deduct the dividends that are being paid, from the up front renewal premiums that are charged, you end up with a very illuminating picture. The League filled a gap during a crisis situation, and continues to manage itself to the best end for Mound. Ed Shukle Pase 4 Januarys26, 1989 I see Mound's management doing an incessant job of staying on top of all areas of risk management. I am consulted and questioned repeatedly about all kinds of changes in my industry and what is available that could specifically serve Mound's needs. This type of management can only strengthen Mound's ability to command the lowest prices from the insurance marketplace, both now and in the future. Your initiating of new steps to more control your Worker's Compensation exposure and claims is indicative of the progressiveness of your existing management. In finale, I recommend that the City accept the policies as I have quoted them, with the insurance companies I have quoted the policies with. I thank you in advance for the years you have allowed me to serve as your insurance agent. Respectfully, Earl E. Bailey CITY OF MOUND SUMMARY OF 1989 INSURANCE COVERAGES Thio Jo s uumm&F~ of :Four lnour&nc oovorqoo prep&rod for ~ ~vml~ ~. m ~ttm. COVERAGES I. PROPERTY II. III. Building & Contents - Blanket 1. Perils Insured Against "Ail Risk", Subject to Company Forms Replacement Cost Betterments & Improvements 90% Co-Insurance Agreed Amount Endorsement 92,500.00 Deductible, Per Occurrence Contents at 2324 Wilshire Boulevard 1. Perils Insured Against a. "All Risk", Subject to Company Forms b. Replacement Cost c. 100% Co-Insurance d. $2,500.00 Deductible, Per Occurrence BUSINESS INTERRUPTION me Loss of Earnings 1. At Location 2324 Wilshire Boulevard 2. 25% Monthly Limitation 3. "Ail Risk", Subject to Company Forms 4. No Deductible CRIME Insures Money Against Actual Disappearance, Destruction, or Wrongful Abstraction 9250.00 Deductible 1. LOcation - 5341Maywood Road a. Loss Insude Premises b. Loss Outside Premises Location - 2324 Wilshire Boulevard a. Loss Inside Premises b. Loss Outside Premises 3. Depositors Forgery 4. 9250.00 Deductible Employee Dishonesty &'Faithful Performance Bond: City Clerk Finance Director Employees $ 3,798,259. $ 180,000. $ 80,000. 9 3,000. $ 3,000. $ 10,000. 9 10,000. 9 20,000. 20,000. 20,000. 100,000. COVERAGES (Contr.) IV. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY --(CLAIMS - MADE FORM) Limits of Liability 1. Each Occurrence Limit 2. $1,000.00 Deductible Applies to Ail Property Damage Claims Premises Medical Payment 1. Expense Limit 2. Expense Aggregate C. Manufacturers/Contractors 1. Additional Ensured/Burlington Northern D. Premises/Operations E. Contractual Liability Coverage - Blanket F. Personal Injury & Advertising Injury Liability Coverage G. Host Liquor Liability H. Fire Damage Limit Ke Products & Completed Operations Aggregate Liabilit~ Broadening Endorsement 1. 2. e 5. 6. 7. Broad Form Property Damage Liability Incidental Medical Malpractice Liability Coverage NOn-Owned Watercraft Liability Coverage (Under 25' in Length) Limited - Worldwide Liability Coverage Additional Persons Insured Extended Bodily Injury Coverage Automatic Coverage - Newly Acquired Organizations (180 Days) Alienated Premises Coverage Explosion, Collapse & Underground (X, C & U) Property Damage Liability Coverage Emergency Medical Technicians 1. $250.00 Deductible 600,000. $ 1,000. $ lO,OOO. Included Included Included Included $ 50,000. $ 6OO,OOO. $ 600,000. POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Limits of Liability 1. Personal Injury, Bodily Injury Personal Damage & Punitive Damage 2. $1,000 Deductible $ 600,O00/Per Occurrence VI. COVEI~GES (Contr. ~),, LIQUOR LEGAL LIABILITY (Dram Shop) Limit of Liability 1. Bodily Injury 2. Property Damage 3. Loss of'Means of Support 500,000. 500,000. 500,000. VII. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY & PHYSICAL DAMAGE Liability 1. Limit Per Occurrence 2. Personal Injury Protection 3. Uninsured & Underinsured Motorists 4. Hired Automobiles 5. Non-Owned Automobiles Physical Damage 1. Comprehensive - See Schedule 2. Collision - See Schedule Schedule of Vehicles - 600,000. 20,000./20,000. 600,000. 1. Street Department 1974 Vac-All 1975 Chev Dump Trk. 1978 Chev Pumper Trk. 1981 Ford 2½T Trk. w/Plow & Wing 1979 Ditchwitch Trlr. 1983 Ford LB00 1985 Ford Dump Trk. w/Plow Wing & Sander 1987 Chev. P/U 1976 Ford 3/4 Ton 1989 Chev P/U $250 $250 VIN # Comp. Coil. 1843 X 0160 X 0638 No 5610 X 1134 X 7082 X 5559 X 9201 X 9363 X 2967 X NO. Coll. X No Coll. X X X X X X X 2. Park Department 1975 Snowco 2-Wheel Trlr. 1978 Chev. Dump Trk. 1984 Snowco Trlr. No Coverage for Comp. or Coll. 3751 X 0598 X X X Ce me Se Ye Schedule of Vehicles Park Department (Con't) 1959 Dodge 1T4X4 Water Department 1985 Chev P/U 1973 Chev 2½ T Dump Trk. 1987 Chev. P/U Sewer Department 1973 Tank Trk. 1970 Ford ½T P/U w/Rodding Machine 1970 Ford Trk w/Flusher Unit 1987 Chev P/U Police Department 1954 Dodge 3/4 T Van 1978 Chev ½T P/U w/Camper 1979 Chev Impal~ 1984 Ford LTD 1983 Ford LTD 1988 Chev Celebrity 1988 Chev Celebrity 1987 Pontiac 6000 1987 Pontiac 6000 1988 Chev. Beretta Administrative 1982 Chev Cavalier Fire Department 1954 Dodge 3/4 T Van COVERAGES,(Con't.) YIN # 1286 0589 1474 1887 0841 3317 9118 1138 6509 8399 4018 5309 6161 6161 7131 7165 7699 6539 1456 $25O ~omp. -X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X No Comp or Coll. $250 Coll. X No Coll. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Fire Department (Con't.) 1969 Mack #11 Pumper Trk. 1973 Mack t12 Pumper Trk. 1974 Chev. #14 Rescue Van 1976 Ford Tanker 1981Sutphen Fire~ruck 1984 Ford Pumper Trk. 1987 Chev. Fire Rescue 1968 Ford Tanker Trk. COVERAGES (Con'£.) VIN# 1139 1508 6332 1709 1524 1441 9503 0346 $250 Comp. X X X X X X X $25O Coll. X X X No Coll. X X X X Inspection Department 1982 Chev Cavalier 6610 X X VIII. INLA/~ F~RINE A. Type of Equipment 1. Contractor's Equipment 2. Radio Equipment B. Perils Insured Against 1. "All Risk", Per Company Forms. 2. $1,000.00 Deductible C. Schedule of Equipment Street Department 1970 Cat Grader 120, S#SN14K1983 1970 Pelican - Elgin Sweeper 1 Air Compressor & 2 Hammers 1 High Pressure Steam Cleaner 1981 Elgin Street Sweeper 4 Truck Wing Blades @ $2,000/Each 1 Transit - Sears 1 Street Sign Making Unit 1 Trackless MT Diesel Snow Blower 1 Roller - Raygo 2-36 1974 Asplundh Clipper 1 1984 Cat Loader, S#2289 $ 767,474. $ 106,706. Amount of Insurance 140,000. 70,000. 26,000. 4,000. 7O,OOO. 8,000. 1,ooo. 2,500. 5O,OOO. 23,000. 13,000. 7o,ooo. VIII. COVERAGES, (Con't.) INLAND MARINE C. Schedule of Equipment Con't. Street Department 1 Oiler, S# 1986 Ford Cherry Picker 8714 TOTAL Fire Department 8000 Feet of 2-½" Hose @$1.80 6000 Feet of 1-½" Hose @$1.40 3200 Feet of 4" Hose 26 MSN Air Packs @ $350./Each Resuscitators (Globe) @$500./Each Robert Shaw Resuscitator 1964 Lund Boat, S#8843 7-½ GO Sears Motor, S#5B211896 1968 Balco Interceptor Trailer 1 Hearst Tool Total Water Department 1 Peabody Barnes 300 GPM Homelite Pump 1 Water Meter Test Bench 1 Electric Gate Valve Operator 2 FA-22 Heliflux Wand Magnetic Locator 3500 Watt Generator 2500 Watt Portable Generator 1 Water Tapping Machine 1Hach Chemical Test Kit 2 Metro'Tec Pipe Locator 2 GE Radios 1 Metro Tec Leak Locator 2 EM Generators TOTAL Amount of Insurance $ 10,000. $ 15,000. 502,500. 16,000.. 9,000. 1,000. 21,000. 1,ooo. 450. 1,200. 1,ooo. 400. 10,000. $ 61,050. 1,300. 1,2oo. 5,000. 1,200. 1,500. 2,000. 1,500. 4,000. 3,000. 2,500. 1,000. $ 24,200. COVERAGES (Con't.) VIII. INLAND MARINE (Con't.) C. Schedule of Equipment (Con't.) 4. Sewer Department 1 Homelite Blower (Air) 1WZ Gazz Hell Flex Magnetic Locator 1 1976 Jet Machine 1 Gas Monitor TOTAL 5. Police Department 6 Resuscitators @ $500./Each 5 Kustom Signals KR 10 Moving Radars @ $2,500./Each 2 Portable Breath Testers @ $1,200./Each 1Kustom KR II Handheid Nikon FE 35mm SLR & Equipment 3 Resusci Anni (2 Owned +1 Non-Owned @ $1,200./Each 2 Resesci Baby (2 Owned @$300./Each) 4 Remington 870 12 Ga. Shotgugs @ $280./Each 1S & W MOdel 3000 12 Ga. Shotgun TOTAL Shop Department 1 Automatic Garage Hoist Coats 10-10 Tire Changer 300lb. Compressor 2 Air Wrenches 1-15 Ton Floor Jack (Air) 1 Specialty Equipment High Pressure Car Wash, S#~[PM 48-S343 1DZDP 1 Tire Balancer TOTAL 400. 750. 23,000. 1,300. 25,450. 3,000. $ 12,500. $ 2,400. $ 2,000. $ 3,500. $ 3,600. $ 600. $ 1,120. $ 270. $ 28,9 0. $ 15,000. $ 2,000. $ 2,500. $' 400. $ 1,500. 4,000. 6,000. $ 31,400. VIII. INLAND MARINE COVEKAGES~(Con't.) Schedule of Equipment (Con't) 7. Fire Department - Radio Equipment 41Plectron Tone Activated Radio Honitors @ $198./Each 38 Motorola Pagers w/Chargers @ $350./Each 8 E. F. Johnson Model 558 Mobile Units @ $1,O00./Each 1E. F. Johnson Repeater Base Station 1 Johnson Base Station & 3 Mobile City Band Radios 1 Antenna @ Fire Station 150' Cable 1 Power Pack Converter & Antenna 9 Portable Fire Radios TOTAL 8. Police Department - Radio Equipment 8 G. E. VHF'Police Mobiles @ $1,500./ Each (Bolted in Squads) 5 G. E. UHF Police Mobiles @ $1,500./Each 6 Portable CB's @ $200./Each 6 Portables @ $1,500./ Each 3 Nutone Pagers @ $250./Each 1 Miniature Robot Car 5 Johnson Mobile Units @ $714./Each (Bolted in Squads) 9 Light Bars & Sirens @ $1,500./Each TOTAL 9. City Manager Department 1 Portable 545 Radio Parks - Radio 2 Motorola Dash Mount Radio - @'$1,500/Each 1 GE'Hand Held Portable with Dash Mount 2 Uniden Force Hand Held Portable - @ $650 Each TOTAL Parks Department - Schedule of Equipment 1974 Ford 2000 w/Loader 10. 11. Amount of Insurance $ 8,118. $ 13,300. 8,000. 2,500. 4,375. 650. 633. 150. 10,600. 48,326. 12,000. 7,500. 1,200. 9,0OO. 750. 4,100. 3,570. 13,500. $ 51,620. $ 460. 3,000. 2,000. 1.3oo. 6,300. 20,000. COVERAGES (Con't.) · IIqLAI~D ~INE (Con't.) 11. Parks Department-Schedule of gquipmemt(Con'c.) 1. Post Hole Digger 9" Augger · 24" Augger 2. 1979 Mars Broom 3. 1974 Hay Mower w/Sickle Bar 4. 1974 Pushblade 5. 1974 Rear 3/pt. Blade 1987 Melroe 843 Diesel'Bobcat 1. 72" Gravel Bucket 2. Pallet Forks 3. Grappler 4. Land Scrapper 5. Tree Spade 6. Cab Enclosure Amount of Imsurance 500. 250. 250. 1,500. 5,000. 400. 400. 16,000. 500. 400. 700. 700. 700. 200· Mowers 1984 Howard Turf Blazer 72" Diesel 727 1974 Howard Turf Blazer 60" Gas 1986 John Deere 21" Push Mower 4 Cycle 3.5 HP 1968 Toro 21" Selfpropelled 4 Cycle 4HP 1976 Lawn Boy 21" Push Mower 2 Cycle 3HP 1986 John Deere 250 G Trimmer Nylon Line 1986 John Deere 200 G Trimmer Nylon Line 1983 Ryan Trimmer Nylon Line 1988 John Deere 72" with Attachments 13,000. 6,000. 250. '600. 250· 250. 200. 250. 15,234. Trailers 1975 Snowco 2 Wheel Trailer Tilt Bed 1984 Snowco 2 Wheel Trailer With Rear Gate $ 1987 10,000ih. Dual Axel Trailer w/Tool Bin & Ramps$ Sign Router w/Stand & Letters 10 HP Johnson Outboard Motor and Tank Jacobson 3HP 2 Cycle, 1984 Snowblower 500' 1½" Diameter Hose Alumacraft 18' Boat $ $ $ $ $ 700. 1,000. 1,800. 3,500. 1,000. 350. 800. 1,200. VIII. COVEKAGES (Con't.) INLAND MARINE (Con't.) C. Schedule of Miscellaneous Equipment Lund 16' Aluminum Boat S#8843 Cement Mixer w/Electric $ 500. $ 500. .$.94,884. IX. PUBLIC OFFICIALS ERRORS & OMISSIONS A. Limit of Liability 1. Includes Prior Acts Coverage 2. Deductible $ 600,000. $ 2,50O. XI. WORKER'S COMPENSATION A. Employer's Liability 1. Based on Payrolls & Population a. Street Construction b. Waterworks c. Volunteer'Fireman d. Policemen e. Off Sale Liquor Store f. Clerical Office g. Parks h. -Sewer Maintenance i. Municipal Employees FIREMAN'S ACCIDENT POLICY Accidental Death and Dismemberment Benefit $200/600/600,000. 141,225. 90,000. 15,700. Pop. 392,175. 67,200. 246,250. 40,950. 52,500. 57,500. 5,000. CITY OF MOUND PREMIUM PAGE JAlgUA.RY 19, 1989 CODE 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 4 PROPERTY CRIME EQUIPMENT GENERAL LIABILITY AUTO LIQUOR E.M.T.'S PUBLIC OFFICIALS E&O POLICE PROFESSIONAL WORKERS COMPENSATION BON~S 1988 10,920. 293. 5,153. 39,053. 21,200: 6,525. INCL. 5,438 INCL. 55,200. i,099 1989 PROJECTED 16,000. INCL. INCL. 39,053. 22,000. 7,178 INCL. 5,982. INCL. 47,700. 1,099 TOTAL $144,881. $138,913. 1989 ACTUAL 8,642.) 293-1513,33 4,4Ol.) 42,847. 23,278. 5,148. INCL. 5,464. 1,168. CODE # 1 2 3 4 LEAGUE OF MN. CITIES INSUANCE TRUST THRU N.S.R.S. TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY (CNA) THROUGH JOHN H. CROWTHER LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST THRU E.B.A. CAPITOL INDEMNITY INSURANCE BINDER THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CONTRACT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY R. L. YOUNGDAML & ASSOCIATES 10261 YELLOW CIRCLE DRIVE MINNETONKA, MN 55343 NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF INSURED CITY OF MOUND 5341MAYWOOD RD. MOUND, MN 55364 Type and Location of Property BLANKET BUILDING & CONTENTS BUSINESS INTERRUPTION Type of Insurance [] Scheduled Form [~ Comprehensive Form Premises/Operations Products/Completed Operations Contractual Other (specify below) Med. Pay. Sp~r person $1:~er Accident Personal Injury Liability ~'~ Non-owned ~'~ Hired Comprehensive-Deductible $ Collision-Deductible $ Medical Payments $ Uninsured Motorist $ No Fault (specify): Other (specify): Binder No, COMPANY MINNESOTA LEAGUE OF CITIES Effective 12:01 m FEBRUARY 1 ,19 89 Expires 12:01 am ~RIL 1, , 19 89 ~_J This binder is issued to extend coverage in the above named company per expiring policy #CMC 9064-9 {except as noted below) Description of Operation/Vehicles/Property MUNICIPALITY Coverage/Perils/Forms ALL RISK FORMS ALL RISK FORMS Amt of Insurance 3,978,259 80,000 Coverage/Forms AS PER COMPANY FORMS AS PER COMPANY FORMS Limits of Liability Each Occurrence Bodily Injury property Damage Bodily Injury & Property Damage Combined 600,000 Personal Injury ~.imits of Liabilit' Bodily Injury (Each Person) Bodily Injury (Each Acbident) Property Damage Bodily Injury & Property Damage Combined Aggregate 600,000 600,000 WORKERS' COMPENSATION - Statutory Limits (specify states below) [] EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY - Limit 200/600/600 SPECIAL CONDITIONS/OTHER COVERAGES CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT - ALL RISK COVERAGES, $1,000 DEDUCTIBLE. MONEY $3,000 AT 5341 MAYWOOD RD., $10,000-2324 WILSHIRE BLVD. X-OTHER: EMT, & PUBLIC OFFICIALS E&O INCLUDING PRIOR ACTS COVERAGE. AND SECURITIES: POLICE PROFESSIONAL, NAME AND ADDRESS OF ~ MORTGAGE E[~] LOSS PAYEE ~ ADD'L INSURED LOAN NUMBER EARL Date /89 ...... ! ~ SSUE DATE (MM/DD,rYY) THIS BINDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CONTRACT, $U~ECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. PRODUCER R. L. YOUNGDANL & ASSOCIATES, 10261 YELLOW CIRCLE DRIVE MINNETONKA, I~N 55343 CODE CA-PITOL INDE1v[NITY I N ~FFECTIVE I EXPIRATIO DATE ' I TIME ~ DA~ I TIME /1/89 I ' I I"~ 14/[/89 I I"°°" ~ THIS BINDER IS ISSUED TO E~END COVERAGE IN THE A~VE NAMED ~MPANY PER EXPIRING POLICY NO; FO 527414 DESCRIPTION ~ OPE~TION~EHICLE~PROPERW (INCLUDING L~ATION) INSURED CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 INC. SUB-CODE MIJNICIPALITY TYPE OF INSURANCE ~'ROPERTY CAusEs o~ LOSS -- BAS,C I----]B.0AD I--'-']S.EC,~- I. G~ERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY C0NT CTORS AUl'OMOmLE LIABILF~Y NON/OWNED HmED GARAGE ~AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE COLLISION DED: OTC ~ UMBRELLA FORM 0THER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY COVERAGES/FORMS RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS MADE: I AU. VEHICLES I I SCHEDULED VEHICLES J ALL VEHICLES I I SCHEDULED VEHICLES RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS ,MADE: SPECIAL CONDITiONS/RESTRICTiONS/OTHER COVERAGES PUBLIC EI~PLOYEES BLANKET BOND $100,000. AMOUNT DEDUCTIBLE GENEP~kL. AGGREGAT~ PRODUCTS-COMPlO/~ AGGREGATE I~RSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ Ft,~ DAMAGE (ANY ONE MEDICAL EXPENSE (ANY ONE PEI:ISON) S CSL BI PERSJACCID MED PAY $ PIP UM STATED A~UNT $ OTHER ~URRENCE STATUTORY ~t..J=.4NSi.IRl= D (DISEASE-POLiCY LIMITi (DISEASE-EACH EMPLDYE? MORTGAGEE LOSS PAYEE LOANe' ADDITIONAL INSURED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ISSUE DATE (MMIDD/YY) THIS 81NDER IS A TEMPORARY INSURANCE CONTRACT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM. P ODUOE._ COMPANY I BINDER NO. TRANSCONTINENTAL J CC72737424 ' ~ R. L. ¥OONGDAHL & ASSOCIATF. S, INC, EFfECTiVE I ~XP~TON -----Bi DATE I TIME ! DATE ! TIME 10261 YELLOW CIRCLE DRIVE 112:01 I xl ,M 1 HIh-NETONY~, MN 55343 /89 I I I PM/ 4/Z/S9 I INoon THIS BINDER 1S ISSUED TO EXTEND COVERAGE IN THE ABOVE NAMED COMPANY PER EXPIRING POLICY NO.: FO5 2 7 414 CODE SUB-CODE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS~/EHICLES/PROPERTY (INCLUDING LOCATION) i ~SUREO MUNICIPALITY ' . ' '. CITY OF MOUND ~ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD ; MOUND, MN 55364 TYPE OF INSURANCE COVERAGES/FORMS AMOUNT DEDUCTIBLE COINSURANCE PROPERTY CAUSES OF LOSS ~ BASIC E-~BROAD r~-]SPECIAL ERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE ~ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS-COMPIOPS AGGI~GATE $ OWNER'S & CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE E~CH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE {ANY ONE FIRE) RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS MADE: MEDICAL EXPENSE (ANY ONE RERSON) --AUTOMOBILE I ALL VEHICLES l I SCHEDULED VEHICLES CSL B~ PERS~ACCID LIASIL~Y NON/OWNED PO $ HIRED - MED. PAY $ C~RAGE I~P OM $ AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE I ALL VEHICLES t ]SCHEDULED VEHICLES ACV C0LLISION OEO: STATED AMOUNT $ 0.TC DED: OTHER EXCESS LIABILITY ~c. AGGREGATE OC~.~URR $NCE R~--TENT~N UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM RETRO DATE FOR CLAIMS .MADE: WORKER'S COMPENSATION $ (EACh ACCi~E',~~ AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY !$ (OlSEASE-P3,C i$ (OISEASE.EA~',, EMPLOYEE, I SPEC~AL $.500. 000 BI EA. PER.qOlq CONDITIONS/RESTRICTIONS/OTHER COVERAGES " BI EA. OCCURRENCE " PD EA. OCCURRENCE " LOSS MEANS OF SUPPORT " AGGREGATE 53o MORTGAGEE LOSS PAYEE LOAN# ADDITIONALINSURED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1. Thc 'CiU/' League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust ~°~ ~'~dr~ss~m~,~a{,c~'~'~x~ Workers' Compensation ~d Employers' ~b~ A~ccm~nt ~1~ Bestir ~min. ~. A~strator P.o. ~x 59143 YN 55459.0143 Employee BeneQt Administration Co. ~a~ta Blvd., Sultc ~ ~ca~, ~N 5~~ P~ouc (612) ~0311 "ENDORSEMENT"' Agreement No. 0 2 - 6 4 4 - 3 The City of Mound Agreement Period 5341Maywood 2-1-89 to 2-1-90 Mound, MN 55364 Effective Date 2-1-89 Estimated Remuneration Rate Code Description Premium $55,594 5.02 9102 Parks 2,791 Discounted Previous Manual Premium 51,787 Revised Manua! Premium 54,578 Experience Modificaiton .97 Standard Premium 52,941 Premium Discount 4,554 Standard Premium (Net Premium ) 48,387 Amount Previously Paid 000 Ba!ance Due LMCIT 48,387 Date: 2-3-89 February 1, 1989 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle, City Manager & Mound City Council Geno Hoff Street Superintendent 1988 Annual Report The Street Department is responsible for alot of different jobs in our City, everything from Street Maintenance to staking out g~aves. That mean we have to have a very~versatile crew to handle the different projects. ! would like to take this oppportunity to introduce you to our personnel. NAME TITLE STARTING DATE Eugene Hoff Superintendent 1-1-60 Gerald Henke Equip. Operator & Maint. 7-5-65 Dick Johnson Equip. Operator & Maint. 4-25-72 Don Heitz Equip. Operator & Maint. 5-1-73 Tim Johnson Equip. Operator & Maint. 4-17-83 Greg Bergquist Mechanic 9-9-85 As you can see from our starting dates we have some experience. These employees know their jobs and they're good at it. if there is any doubt, think about how many complaints you get on Street Maintenance. (very low) The administration of the Street Department is handled mostly by myself YEARS OF SERVICt 29 24 17 16 6 4 ~ '"~"~' An equal opportumty Emoloyer tt~at does not discr~m~nam on the basis of race, color, national origin, or hand~capped status ~n the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and actiwties, with help from fellow employees in the Public Works. I take all of the complaints and questions and try to solve them one way or another. Some of my other duties include reports (monthly and annual), budget prepartions, supervising personnel, evaluation reports, emergency call out, construction meeting, monthly meeting, project inspections, purchasing of equipment, purchasing of road'material and etc. It's also my job to decide when, where and how the work will be done. Here is a list of some of the duties of the department for the r~pair and maintenance of 50 miles of streets, 11 parking lots and 22 cul-de-sacs. plowing & sanding sweeping clearing street right-of-way of brush and trees bituminous street patching preparing streets for sealcoating transporting street materials street sign repairing and installation of new ones curb & sidewalks street lights retaining walls guardrails maintenance of equipment cemetery work repair & maintenance of storm sewer sys. tem Christmas decorations etc. GENERAL Let me go throught the schedule of the Street Department for 1 year just touching on the main duties starting with Winter. SNOW & ICE CONTROL It's my job to determine when the snow equipment is called out. I depend on the National Weather Service for information concerning any weather systems moving in our direction, also the Police Department. Most of the time I'm out and about to determine what has to be done. When it's icy we sand as soon as possible but when it snow we like to wait untilit's over, if we can, because of a 10 to 12 hour plowing cycle. After that long atime behind the wheel your're tired and we don't have any backups. - 2 - We have a 7 man crew for snowplowing, 5 from the Steer Department including myself, the City mechanic and Greg Skinner, Water & Sewer Supt. The equipment used is 5 - 24 ton dump truck equipped with plow, wing and sanders, 2 - 4 X 4 pickup trucks equipped with 8' plows. After the streets have been cleared and in good driving condition we have 9 miles of sidewalk to plow and haul the snow away. We use the blower and 3 trucks for the job, so as you can see when we get snow we are very busy. SPRING WORK The early part of Spring is when we do our street right-of-way work, that means we cut brush and trim trees that are hanging in the street. The Spring clean-up is a big job, 2 street sweepers, 1 sidewalk broom, 2 trucks and 1 tanker. We sweep everything in town, 50 miles of streets, 11 parking lots, 9 miles of sidewalk, 22 cul-de-sacs. You're looking at 3 to 4 weeks of work. This year in 88 we picked up 207 dump truck loads. From your Spring clean-up work we move into our street patching. Our general street maintenance work isn't bad, we don't, have alot of potholes and cracks to repair. What takes the time and money is to repair the water- main breaks and frostboils. The main breaks have to cut square, compacted and ~epaved. In 1988 we had 17 breaks, ranging in size ~rom 30' X 26' down to 8' X 8' and after these were repaired we had 2 frostboils to dig up, this is even more costly. A frostboil has to subcut 3' to 4' deep and the soil hauled away and replaced with Class 5 road material and repaved. STORM SEWER SYSTEM We have a very large storm sewer system to maintain. I don't have how many miles of pipe we have. ! know we have 355 catchbasins and 77 sump catchbasins. The 355 catchbasins are cleaned after every heavy rain and the sumps are cleaned in the Fall. The City crew maintains and repairs the catchbasins, but when it comes to repairing the pipe itself we have a contractor come in for the work. We don't have the equipment or manpower to handle it. - 3 - Depending on the weather, late Fall we use the vac-all and sweepers to start to pickup leaves, we never get the job done, there just isn't enough time before freeze-up. This year we only picked up leaves for a week because of the moving into the New Public Works Facility. After freeze-up we move into our material hauling, salt & sand, rock, winter mix, sandfill, buckshot and Class 5. From this point we move back into the snow season. 1988 STREET PROJECTS RETAINING WALLS We had our share of troubles with retaining walls again this year. had Bjork Country Stone do repair work on 4 more stone walls. 3015 Drury 72' X 4½ $2,319.40 4954 Brunswick 54' X'3~ $1,294.85 4555 Dorchester 105' X 3½ $2,520.80 5065 Wren 43' X 3' $883.65 TOTAL $7,O18.70 The City Crew repaired 5 small walls tha~ were damaged by vehicles running into them. We COUNTY ROAD 15 PROJECT The road project caused some extra work for City employees. We were responsible for making sure all of the City storm sewer system was connected to the new county system. We had at least 1 meeting a week and sometimes 4 or 5, but in the end it was worth it. After the project is completed the City will end up with maintanence of 48 more street lights and about 2 miles of sidewalk, plus cleaning and sweeping the street from the bridge to Commerce Blvd. - 4 - SEAL COATING Our 88 seal coating was completed by July 5th. Allied Blacktop Co. got the bid to do the work, it took 2 days to shoot 39,977 gallons of CRS-2 emulsion and lay 18OO tons of buckshot. We sealed about 8 miles of streets. When we cleaned up the ~xcess rock we ended up with 126 5 yard loads. CEMENT WORK We had quite abit of cement work to do again this year, alot of the curb and gutter damage was done when we were repairing water and sewer breaks. We had 4 driveway aprons that had to be replaced because of curb box problems. We also replaced 65' of sidewalk in different areas around town. We're going to have sidewalk repairs each year because of frost heaves and the type of material the walk was layed on. Cost of cement work for 88 was $5~224.00 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY First of all I want to th~nk everyone for the persistence and hard work it took to see to it that the city has a safe and decent place for employees to work and also a place to house some very expensive equipment. The new building ended up having 19,888 square feet of floor space, from this facility we operate 4 department, Streets, Water & Sewer, Recycling and Shops and StOres, our Park Department and some of the Police Department operate out of the Island Park Facility. At the Lynwood building we have a concrete bin where we store salt sand, it holds 1,O75 tons, we have another 1000 tons stored in Island Park. The rest of the street materials are stored on the Lost Lake site. The building itself is adequate, NO FRILLS. We started to move the seasonal equipment out of the Balbo building and into the new facility the la~er part of September. The 1st of October we started to move the Island Park operation to the new building, it took awhile moving because the building was empty so far as benches, shelving, hangers, cabinets and some electrical and plumbing work done by employees as we were moving. The new facility, compared to what we were acustom to is a dramatic improvement. THANI~S AGAIN -- 5 -- STREET SIGN MATERIALS We have an on going job trying to keep up with sign repair and replacement. Most of the problem is vandalism, crawling up the post andbending the sign or painting it or just plain stealing them. We also have alot of damage from vehicles being out of control and running over or knocking down the post. Signs and posts replaced in 88 were 141 signs and 220 posts. 88 CEMETERY WORK We staked out 27 graves and 43 markers and pushed the cemetery dhmp 6 times. STREET DEPARTMENT BUDGET We started to work on our 89 budget in July and it was OK'ed the lat%r part of September. The Street Department had a budget of $364,270. For 88 we used 97.1%, we had' some line items that went over such as contractual services, wages (overtime), professional services and a couple of small ones. At the same~im~ most of the line items came in under. It's tough to keep every line item under budget, but if the' overall budget comes in under thats the name of the game. SHOPS & STORES BUDGET We had a budget'of $51,860 for 88 we went over by $5,000. One of.the reasons for going over was getting the new shop equipped with the essentials so we could move in and go to work. Another reason it the rebuilding of some of the older equipment. The money in this budget is also used for the mechanic wages and the operation of the City garage. We purchase tools and equipment, we also carry an inventory of parts, grease, oil, filters, solvents, cleaning equipment, nuts, bolts, electrical supplies, welding supplies and many other items. - 6 - CITh' ()f X'I(.) U' Nil) February, 1989 Mayor and City Council City of Mound Mound, Minnesota In an overlook of the 1988 year For the Park Department, the enclosed annual report .will point out accomplishments met, and will provide direction For upcoming years. These accomplishments were arrived at through a cooperation of efforts from the City Council, City Manager, Park Commission and the maintenance crew. The benefits of these efforts are enjoyed by the citizens of Mound. They have seen improved recreational opportunities that will last Far into the Future, ass'uring them that they will have a qua l i ty ne igh~rhood park and dock program. / fS1~e I y, /Ji~ Fackl er ark Director JF:pj Enclosures 1988 ANNUAL REPORT PARt< DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL ROSTER The Park Department has only one Full-time employee, the Park Director. The rest of the staff is made up of seasonal employees. During the busy spring, summer, and early Fall, there are as many as ten Full-time seasonal employees, between eight and ten part-time seasonal recreational program leaders, twenty- one lifeguards, and one contracted cleaning service. Current Employees Date Hired Park Director Park Maintenance Commons Maintenance Mowing Crew' Tree Trust (2) Dock Inspector Summer Recreation .Cemetery Maintenance Janitorial-Service Jim Fackler Bob Johnson John TaFFe Pat Cheney Heintz ProFt ' Dell Rudolph Martha Mayer Howard Sim ar Cleaning P10s July 1, 1985 May 1, 1982 May t2, i983 June 1, 1987 June 1, 1985' Every June May 1, 1983 April, 1988 May, 1981 danuary l, 1989 Non-Returning Employees Janitorial Service Mowing Crew Commons Maintenance Vernco Maintenance Andy Manthie Pat Cheney (hired Full time by Sewer & Water Dept.) 1988 Annual Report Park Department During 1988, the Park Department has seen change. We have begun a Park Playgrouqd Equipment Replacement Program that will remove old equipment and be replaced with a multi use structure includ- ing swings, slides, and climbing features surrounded' by a sand berm. Currently, the City is in its second year of the five year Park Playground Equipment Replacement Program. There has b~en $23,000 allotted in the 1989 budget for purchase of equipment such as the play structure at Mound Bay Park. The intention of the Park Com- mission is to begin improvements at the neighborhood parks cur- rently being used for the summer playground program and then ex- pand to the other neighborhood parks on a need basis. In 1988 three parks saw the installation of these new structures, Pembrook Park, Clover Circle Park, and Belmont. 1989 site loca- tions are still being determined, but again will be at three parks.' Along with development, maintenance For the parks must be planned. Maintenance and upkeep of the parks is a major in- gredient for their success. Regular mowing, leaf removal, litter pick up and periodic repairs are unavoidable aspects of these parks and generally take up the most man hours over the year. These improvements and maintenance will provide a visual commit~ ment that the City of Mound has ~ dedication towards community development. We have moved into our own maintenance facility (the old Public Works building). This will allow the Park Department to con- solidate all of its equipment, parts, vehicles and supplies at one site. This will also allow for a great savings on time spent running between sites in search of needed items which greatly aid in the servicing and longevity of vehicles and tractors that in the past have been left outside. This facility will need some basic improvements that were originally part of the monies used for the new Public Works building. This will be looked at in 1989, and a plan will be provided For the 1990 Budget. SUMMER RECREATION PROGRAM In the past, the City of Mound has sponsored a summer recreation program that lasts six weeks, From mid-June through the end of July. A program supervisor oversees a schedule of events at Five parks; Belmont, Swenson, Clover Circle, Highland, and Three Points, where there is a Park Leader and an assistant to carry 1988 Annual Report Park Department out the daily program. The program was limited to arts and crafts and games suited For the younger children, ten years and under. Currently, the Park Commission has expanded program FOr the sum- mer of 1989. This was accomplished by co-sponsoring a program with Westonka Community Services. The basic concept is a program, still offered in the neighborhood park, but utilizing the Community Services special Facilities, such as the indoor pool or gym, and co-offering events or Field trips. This would be supervised by Martha Mayer. This type of approach will offer a great deal of flexibility to a wide variety of age groups. The programming will represent their special interests and allow for expansion over the years. COST ESTIMATE MOUND PARK PROGRAM I989 LABOR Park Program/Lifeguard Supervisor 35 hfs/week @ 12 weeks @ $7.75/hr Cost to Park Program Park Coordinators 18 hrs/week @ 6 weeks @ $4.2§/hr @ 5 parks (Including Benefits) Park Assistants lB hfs/week @ 6 weeks @ $4.00/hr,@ 5 parks (Including Benefits) Day Camp Coordinator 30 hrs/week @ 6 weeks @ $5.25/hr (Including BeneFi.ts) Day Camp Assistants 30 hfs/week @ 6 weeks @ 4.25/hr @ 2 Assistants (Including Benefits) Community Services OFFice Staff (Jim Glasoe as well as secretarial time) EQUIPMENT (Softball, Parachutes, G~mes, Coolers, etc.) SUPPLIES (Paints, Paper, Craft Supplies, Snacks) TRANSPORTATION (50 hrs @ $lO/hr + $250 For mileage) MISCELLANEOUS Subtotal Administration Fee TOTAL $ 2,000 2,640 2,295 ],087 760 ],500 400 500 750 100 $13',032 17955 $14,987 REVENUES Day Camp: 30 Kids @ $20 ea. @ 6 weeks Special Event Days: 100 Kids @ $.50 ea. @ 6 days Total Revenue CITY OF MOUND SUBSIDY NEEDEO 3,600 300 $ 3,900 $11 ,OB7 4 313 1988 Annual Report Park Department MUNICIPAL CEMETERY The Mound Cemetery was established in IBB4 and operated under an association until 1944, when the cemetery was turned.over to the City of Mound. There are three divisions, A and B are the old sections to the west and the new section C, to the east. Currently, the grounds are maintained by a seasonal employee. He supplies his own equipment and is paid.for time and machinery. The Park Crew helps When requested for projects that are larger in nature than the daily upkeep. The Fertilization and weed con- trol is done though a contract with ProLawns Inc. In 19B8 a survey was done to compare the current fees for plots at the Mound Cemetery with other municipal and private cemeteries. The last fee change was done in the late 1960's and was in need of updating. With a11 information in, the Park Com- mission recommended an increase to the City Council. The in- crease for 1989 is 'as listed: Adult, resident Adult, nonresident Baby, resident Baby, nonresident Ash Burial $200 400 100 150 # * No additional charge if plot is purchased as a single-burial, $25 charge if.ash burial is placed on top of a casket burial. A resident for the plot fee is described as a person who resided in the City of Mound at the time of death The operation of the cemetery is at a break even with income from the sale of plots. The current level of maintenance at the cemetery needs to be upgraded to aid in providing a more attrac- tive setting. This could be done through irrigation, signage and fencing. HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL As of December 31, 1988, the yearly total of hazardous tree removals from City property were 57 trees removed, 21 stumps chipped, and a number of limbs trimmed that posed a hazard. From private property under forced removal, three were taken. On an average, a tree is costing the City more to remove it in 1988 than in 1987. This is due to the high cost of disposal of the 5 J988 Annual Report Park Department tree and higher charge for contractors for insurance that is for- warded onto the customer. Overall, in the budget for tree removal, there has been a reduction in the amount spent tn 1988. This is due to Fewer trees (68 in I987 and 57 in t988) and mul- tiple trees being removed From one site. Diseased and hazardous trees are removed on a complaint basis. When a complaint is received an inspection of the tree' is done to determine the need of removal and the ownership. City owned trees are removed by a contraCtor as soon as possible, while private trees are removed in accordance with City Ordinances. Private trees not removed in the grace period allowed, are Forced removed. The cost of a forced removed tree is billed to the property owner. IF this bill is not paid, it is then attached to their property taxes. COMMONS DOCKS The Commons Dock system is made up of approximately 4.5 miles of lakeshore, providing 427 dock sites. The Dock inspector works under the direction of the Park Director. His m~in dUties are the processing of dock applications, inspections of the dock sites, notification of the discrepancies to permit holders, and an informational source For the general public and City. 1988 was the second .year that the Com~.ons Dock Program had been as- signed its own Financial division. This allowed a concise look at the cost of the commons program and aided in setting a Five year rate adjustment schedule to bring it to a self supporting position. In 1988, the largest line item in the commons budget was For capital improvements. These improvements consisted of $29,000 For riprapping and $13,000 towards dredging of Black Lake Chan- nel . The Riprapping was completed with a contractor doing '1,370 In. Ft. of shoreline and the City crew doing 1,495 ln. Ft. This riprapping is part of a four year plan for shoreline protection. 1988 was the second year of the plan, and during this year dealt with the most critical areas. The entire commons has been in- spected to determine a priority For riprap work. This is done twice a year, in the spring and Fall. The most advantageous time to do riprapping is in the months of January and February. This is due to being able to drive trucks onto the ice with m~terials to the work site, rather than using a barge. The cost per in. Ft. is cut to less than half the cost during open water months when a barge must be used. 6 1988 Annual Report Park Department In 1988 we worked on one dredge at Waterside Lane/Cardinal to Morton. The necessary permits have been obtained For this project, and the contractor has estimated the dredge to be com- pleted the end oF January 1989. CITY BEACHES The beaches are operated under a contract with Westonka Community Services. The cost estimates For 1989 are as Follows: COST ESTIMATES CItY BEACHES 1989 LABOR Headguards: 773 hrs @ $5.90/hr SurFside Beach: 900 hrs @ $4.50/hr Five Small Beaches: 825 hfs @ $4.50/hr 4,560 4,050 3,712 IN-SERVICE 225 HRS @ $4.50/HR 1,013 MILEAGE (roving guard and supervision) 1100 miles @ .21/mile 231 SUPERVISION 200 hrs @ $7.50/hr 1,500 EQUIPMENT I00 Subtotal Administration Fee $15,616 2,276 TOTAL $17,440 NET INCREASE OVER 1988 FIGURES = 5% These costs cover expenses incurred by Westonka Community Serv- ices in supplying lifeguards. They do not show the cost oF main- tenance, weed removal, buoys, portable toilets and life saving equipment. These come out oF the Park Fund. DEPOT AND ISLAND PARK BUILDINGS The Depot building has been going through yearly remodeling. The Financing oF these improvements have been in part supplied by the City and government subsidies. Currently, there is still work 7 1988 Annual Report Park Department that needs to be done, i.e. repair or replacement of exterior soffets and fascia, deck on west end, etc. There are not funds available from outside of the City to do these improvements, so Future budget requests will show an increase. The facility is being used for meetings of local organizations and For rental by private individuals for parties. Response From these users has been positive. Future improvements at the Depot will reinforce the depot as an asset to our City. The Island Park building is also being used as 'a meeting place for local organizations and is occasionally rented from the general public. This facility is currently being used as a storage area For Police Department supplies. Only routine main- tenance is being performed on this building. There is a need For updating, but use demand does not, at this time, justify the ex- pendit'ure. CITY HALL MAINTENANCE/JANITORIAL The Park Department is responsible for some areas concerning city hall maintenance and janitorial services. The grounds, lawn care and snow. removal are seasonal, while responsibilities For heating/air conditioning are year round. All projects within the capabilities of the park staff are per- Formed. This~ has been in the areas of repairs to plumbing, heat- ing and related equipment. Major repairs or cleaning services are contracted out through the direction of the Park Department. Currently, we have a contract service for janitorial, carpet cleaning and the heating and air conditioning systems. Other projects have been assigned to the Park Department as instructed by the City Manager. PARK COMMISSION The Park Commission is made up of nine members and a council Rep- resentative. Their activities are: o Commons Dock Programs and related concerns. o Parks/wetlands and related concerns. o Cemetery. o Island Park Hall and Depot buildings. 8 i988 Annual Report Park Department o Swimming beaches and lifeguards. o Hazardous tree removal. o Summer Recreation Program. o Budget preparation. Some of the areas the Park Commission has reviewed in 1988 were: o Establishing the riprap area to be contracted for 1989. o Commons maintenance permits and the revision and implemen- tation of the flow chart that addresses maintenance requests. o Distribution of funds allotted for park improvements. o Commons dock fees based on a five year plan beginning in ]988 to bring the Dock program to a self supporting program. o OverseetHg summer recreation/lifeguard programs. o Dock 1oration map update. o Review of LMCD fees accessed to docks program. The Park Commission, alOng with the City Council members, toured the city's docking areas, parks and related properties that have come up in discussion during regular meetings. This tour will be conducted each year and will greatly aid in helping to make deci- sions affecting these areas. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT Preventive, daily, and unplanned maintenance of all related equipment is the responsibility of the Park Department. Please note on page tO the equipment inventory. The city mechanic provides assistance when a situation requires ~ his skills, or another Public Works person who is skilled in the problem helps. Major overhauls or repairs where a specialized skill or equipment is involved is contracted outside of the City. An equipment replacement schedule is maintained to allow for up- dating of major capital outlays (note: yearly purchase breakdown on page 11). This schedule when observed, will allow the Park Department tO operate efficiently and provide safety for the general public and the park crew. 9 PaRK DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT INVENTORY & REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE CURRENT EQUIPMENT 3/4 TON 4X4 FORD SNOWPLOW MODEL/ REPLACEMENT SERVICE REPLACEMENT YEAR YEAR YEARS COST 1976 1990 14 24,000 3/4 TON 4X4 CHEV SNOWPLOW 1982 1991 9 20,000 TON PICKUP DUMP 1978 1992 14 24,000 3/4 TON PICKUP 980 1993 13 13,000 FORD 2000 TRACTOR* 1974 FRONT LOADER 1974 POSt HOLE DIGGER 1974 TWO AUGERS 1974 SICKLEBAR 1974 MOWER DECK 1974 PLOW 1974 10,000 JOHN DEERE 72" MOWER 1988 SNOWBLOWER 1988 BROOM 1988 CAB 1988 1996 8 1996 8 -1996 8 TURF BLAZER 72" 1984 1992 8 15,000 WEEDWHIP (2) MOWER PUSHMOWER 1988 1987/88 I9~0 Z 1990/91 3 650 4oo EA BOB CAT 843 1987 1997 10 PLANER 1987 1997 10 PALLET FORK 1987 1997 tO GRAPPLE FORK 1987 1997 10 CAB 1987 1992 5 LANDSCAPE BKT 1987 1992 5 300 1,000 UTILITY TRAILER 1987 10,000 LB UTILITY TRAILER 1988 7,000 LB UTILITY TRAILER 1984 2,500 LB UTILITY TRAILER 1979 2,000 LB 2002 15 2003 15 1999 15 1994 15 10 HP BOAT MOTOR 14' ALUMNA CRAFT 1961 1970 10 EQUIPMENT FIVE YEAR REPLACEMENT PROGRAM YEAR 1990 WEEDWHIPS (2) PUSHMOWER 3 PT. PLUG GROUND AIR ONE TON DUMP 1991 3/4 TON PICKUP 4X4 W/SNOWPLOW PUSHMOWER 1992 BOB CAT CAB BOB CAT BUCKET ONE TON DUMP 72" MOWER 1993 3/4 TON PICKUP 2X4 PUSH MOWER WEEDWHIP (Z) 1994 UTILITY TRAILER PUSH MOWER COST $ 650 400 5,000 24,000 ZO,O00 40O 300 1,000 25,000 15,000 17,000 45O 75O 2,500 450 3' 0 11 lg88 Annual Report Park Department SUMMARY Listed below are some of the special projects completed in I988. These are just areas of special note in the operation of the Park Department. The year was consumed with the daily procedure of the parks responsibilities. I. Repaired Dove Lane after dredge. 2. Removed old park equipment From Three Points Park, and repaired sand berm in tot area. 3. Riprapped and Filled Waterside Commons. 4. Repaired Centerview Beach. 5. Repaired dock area. From Ashland to Cardinal. 6. Removed old equipment From Edgewater Park. 7. Removed old equipment From Avon Park-. 8. Dredged Excelsior Lane and repaired shoreline with riprap. 9. Installed 'park equipment at Pembrook Park. 10. Riprapped Devon Commons. Il. Repaired Wychwood Beach, removed brush and riprapped culvert. 12. Constructed retaining wall at Depot. 13. Repaired riprap/Fill at Twin Park. 14. Repaired riprap/Fill at Ridgewood Park. 15. Constructed walkway For Sinclair Park, riprapped, and Filled. 16. Moved into old Public Works building. 17. Installed park equipment at Clover Circle Park 18. Installed park equipment at Belmont Park. 1988 was a successful year with its highlight being the adoption of the requested 1989 budget. This new budget shows an active participation of the City of Mound in providing a progressive park system. 39/ Box 37, Mound, Minnesota .55364 February 6, 1989 TO: Mayor Steve Smith Mound City Council City Manager, Ed Shukle FROM: Don Bryce, Fire Chief MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT Fire and rescue calls were down 7% from last year, but of course last year was a unbelievable year for calls, with 440. The year we had 413 calls, in 1986 - 378 calls, so we still were busy! In Mound we had the same calls for fires as last year, but we were down 6~ on rescue calls. Mound had a total of 233 calls, 3~ less than 87. Thats 775 of our calls. The breakdown for the cSntract areas is: Minnetonka Beach - down 175 on fires and same on rescues, (18 fires, 2 rescues). Minnetrista down 9~ on fires and down 16~ on rescues, (23 fires., 19 rescues). Orono- down 22~ on fires and down 9~ on rescues, (36 fires, 11 Rescues.). Shorewood - down 300~ on fires and up 100~ on rescues, (1 fire, 1 rescue). Spring Park - down 13~ on fires and up 29,~ on rescues, (46 fires, 18 rescues). The total over all - fires down 9~, 252 fire calls and down 3~ on rescues - 160 calls. Mutual Aid we were up 1 each given and received on calls. We gave to Maple Plain, St Boni, Long Lake and two to Excelsior. We received from Maple Plain three times, St Boni three times. On two occasions we had St Boni and Maplq, Plain together, for the Masonic Lodge fire in December, and a barn fire in May in Minnetrista. It is such an asset for. Mutual Aid that we all have this agreement. We can not stress enough on the training our men to through and what they' have to go through. We have two drills a month plus we had ten gp to State Fire School, two to International Fire Instructors, in Cincinnati, plus our burings on Saturdays that we drill on. Other schools and Conferences are State Fire Chiefs, International Asso. of Fire Chiefs, Fire Instructors Asso Minnesota and National Fire Protection Asso. Every Firefighter had and di~ go to HAZARDOUS MATERIAL school last fall, along with the police and other fire departments in this area. Page 2 cont. Again we've been short handed this year and I lost my key officers, since I've been Chief, to retirement. (Key officers, I mean by 20 years of service.) I'm still down 5 fire fighters and hopefUlly, with the new revised By-laws, the quota will be filled this year. Our efforts are being turned to fill these slots with as many day time personal as possible. Maintenance to our equipment is done by our own men, at the fire station, except for a few major repairs. We have three men that we call heavy maintenance and we have group maintenance. I have five groups with 5-6 men in a group, that clean the station, and do minor repair and check everything on the trucks, like tires, pumps, oil, gas/diesel, check hoses etc. ~Ve are'in the process of getting lights (little flashers) for our private vehicles to aid us in responding to the fire station, to answer calls. Maybe this will help us firefighters to help, the public in answering their fires or rescues by 2-3 minutes, which could mean a life or their personal property!! We don't just go on calls and drills and the monthly meetings. There are additional burnings,, like I said~earlier, Mutual Aid, United Fire Fighters,. WAFTA, and Relief 'Asso meeting. And I as Chief have Hennepin County Fire Chiefs, which I'm President this year, and also I.'m an alternate for the Great Lake Fire Chiefs which is a division of the International Fire Chief's Association. I make out the monthly reports to the City and State. The City's report consist of the total number of calls, the breakdown for each city, fire or resuces, the total hours for each man, plus total charges that the department received monthly for the payroll. The State report goes to the Fire Marshall office MFIRS (MN Fire Incident Reporting System) to keep a record on all calls that occur in the State. The Relief Association is an organization mandated by State Law to manage the receipts from the 2% State Aid and City contributions and administer the Fire Department disability and retirement benefits. .To retire'a Fire Fighter has to have 20 years of services, to collet the pension, they have to be 50 years of age. Our new computer, as you see with the break down on the trucks, has been VERY helpful. It tells us where the hydrants are,. in our area, we have a system set up for Hazardous Material in our area, cost analysis on equipment and our inventory. Getting the monthly reports started on this too, so should start to be alot easier. There's alot more that is being done and alot of us are leaning it. I thank the two that have done so much for me, one does the hardware, and the other programs it. Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364 ACTIVE SENIORITY ROSTER FIRr= :GH~R ENTRY DATE i MiKE DAVID 08 02 6~ 2 DON BRYCE 05/03 65 3 JOHN BEAUCHAHP 04 :'06 :'70 4 BUD OPITZ 06 .'0! ," 70 ~/2~ 5 GRIG JOHNSON 12 '06 /71 6 GERALD GARVIAS 07/02/73 7 BILL SWE:fSON 07 '02.'73 /J-- /~f 8 9 !0 il 12 !3 1-% 16 18 19 BRAD LANDSYLAX 03.'04 ' 74 KO:( MARSCH?{E 03 "04 "74 GERALD BABB 09/09"74 r~Ax"r~ BOYD 02 03/75 GRiG "PEDERSON 02,."~s .... mn~,~. ~., , ~x ~ :x S O'.x 09 ,:'0~, STEVE ERICKSON i!.'02 '75 HARV NELSON 1 ! ./03/7 DAVID C.~R-SON 04/05/76 CRAIG HENDERSON ii.'0l. 76 SCOTT BRYCE ~ nl '09 SrrVr~ ~ ~ COLL![{S 02 ,' 06 ,."7 20 23 24 26 HIKE PALM , 06.'04 GRIG ANDERSON 12./03 JOHN NAFUS 06 '02 }]iKE SAVAGE 09,'15 JEEP ANDERSEN 0 9/22 TIP WILL!AHS !! ,"07 RICK W!LLIAHS !I '07 GRIG PALH 02:06 79 79 80 80 80 83 83 84 TONY RAS>!USSEN BRIAN iRiCNSON RON STALL}lAN :.,: 'fi' ! :< C;R A D i:' JiM CASEY Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364 =IREFIGU~"='R A D D R ~- $ S CITY PH©:{$ DOB ANDERSEN ANDERSON BABB BIAUCHAHP BOYD BRYCE BRYCE CARLSON CASEY COLLINS DAVID ERICKSON ERICKSON GARViAS GRADY HENDERSON JOHNSON NAF~$ N£LSO~ OPITZ PALH PAL>i PEDERSON JEFF' 2221 SOUTHViEW LX MOU>;D 55364 472-7~64 07/i0/x7 GRIG 4924 PLYMOU/u., RD HOUND 55364 472-7225 .~' i~ GERALD .~169 BIRCH LN HOUND 55364 47°-°858_ . 08/27."~0 JOHN 60~9_ ASPEN RD MOUND }5~'':,~ ~-3070,, 08'~c ~6 DAVID 5936 GUMWOOD RD MOUND ~364 472-4515 01/30:52 DON 4820 CAXTEBURY RD MOUND ~5364 472-408= 12'04/42 SCOTT 5955 IDLEWOOD RD HOUND 55364 472-3622 01/09/57 DAVID 47~2 GORDON RD ~OUXD 5~364 472-5~8~ 10/17/-1 JIM 4968 .~.zO:~ RD MOUND 55364 472-~7x0 09~25 STEVE 2121 GRANDVIEW BLVD MOUND 5~364 472-5267 09,'08/50 HiKE 2163 D!AHOXD LN MOUND 55364 472-'4320 02/04/'41 ~RIAN 60!~ ,,Ai~...OR,k_ RD MOUND 5'364 ~72-8,069 06/~0/60 STEVE 4367 SHORELINE. DR SP.PK ~x384 471-7129 10/28/49 GERALD 2180 CARDINAL LN MOUND 553.64 472=2374 11/27/51 KEVIN 6221 DEERWOOD DR HOUND 55364 472-4048 07/30/61 CRAIG 4435 DORCHESTER RD MOUND 55364 472 ~,6! 0¢:~8/57 GRiG 6056 CHERRYWOOD RD .,~.,~nr'%'n 55364 472-~8~_ ~_ !!/~/47_~, BRAD 2212 FA!RVIEW LN MOUND ~364 472-1817 02/15/52 RON 2207 NOBLE LN .,O~XD 55364 ~7_-3815 07/18/4i JOHN ~580 DUNWOODY LN WAY = ~ ~° _ · ~ 05, 54 ...... =i 471 7~.~_ /10/ MARV 2025 SHOREWOOD LN HOUND x5364 472-3500 08/19/50 BUD 2041' BELAIRE LN MOUND 55364 472 2736 07,/02,"~_ GRIG 2153 LANGDOX LN MOUND ~*''~O~ ~472-!~36- a4/i7,~ /61 .~'IKE, 2695 WESTEDGE BLVD MOUND 5~:64.,., Z72-t972. 07/~4, = ,"' GRIG 6087 ASO= .... _~N RD HOUND 5'364 ~72-578' 02"22/53 - -- 1 O ' 5951 LYNWOOD BLVD MOUND ~5364 472 29_- 0-/02/59 3125 ..zGnLAND BLVD HOUND 5-364 472-3591 0~/08/50 3837 TOGO RD' SP.PK 55384 ~71-7407. 0~,'18.,'.," 6~" 4387 WIr~u~:'~,,~,,._ BLVD HOUND ~:364 472-7061 06/26,'49 4387 W!LSHIRE BLVD HOUND 55364 472-7061 06,'26, 5940 H!LLCREST LN ~.~n~'vn ~ 364 ~7_-7:70 07/'08 '~0 3~35~ AYR LN HOUND x~364 472-6716 0~_ 'C3,~ ~ 62 RASXUSSEN TONY SAVAGE }II KE STALL:dAN RON SWENSOX BILL SW£NSON TOH WI LL iA.'.!S RiCH KiLLiAHS li>l 09/22 09 "09 O4 '06 7' 02'03 7 05,'03 6 0l/09/7 04 "05 .,'7 09;12.,'8 02 06,'''~ 08 ,"02/6 06/02/8 11,/03 "',' 07/02,'7 06/06;'8 1 ! .," 0 ! ," 7 :, !~_../06/71 03 04 ,"7. 03 04/7, 0~ 0~ ii 03;71 06 Oi 7~ O2/O6 O6'O4 02'03 7 03 .,'04 09.,'ix Oi '05 07 ,'02 7 09/08 11/07; i i '0 7 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, inc. Twir~ Cities St Cloud 15050 23r0 Ave. ~y,mouth. MN 55447 February 7, 1989 Teiephone 612/476-6C, i0 Engineers P,anners SJrveyors Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota 1989 Shoreline Protection Project Final Payment Request MFRA #8169 Dear'Honorable Mayor and Council Members: Attached is Minnetonka P~r~able Dredging's Final Payment Request in the - amount of $22,660.00, for work completed on the subject project through January '27, 1989. Since this work is fully completed, we are not recommending any amount be retained. Jim Fackler and myself'have reviewed the proj'ect and find that it is in accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation that the Contractor be pa£d in full. If you have any questions or need additional information, please c6ntact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:aju Enclosures 3?7 0! MA~F;].~.LS C.~; SITE LESS O. ,',.' 0 O. O0 (~ "" 0 rca FjB, 6E.O. ^ ..... ~^ ~,^ ~- ~,.,...;.'-. ,¢c;,. ^ ...... cc .... APPF.:E'.V~::: "Z.- - "7 -- ~ '? 8 _1_¢_,~ OF: COf4TFtP:CTC:E F'P:Y ESTIMATE f'!O. O:L PAGE 816.9' 03: 0.00 2F_',. 660. O0 + RESOLUTION NO. 89- RESOLUTION RELATING TO COUNCIL/STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES WHEREAS, the City Council is composed of five people, all of who have other full-time occupations and responsibilities; and WHEREAS, the people who serve on this Council must depend on the city's staff to provide them with a large amount of background information, data and expertise to aid the City Coun- cil in determining issues, developing policy, and administering the Council's responsibilities in a fair and impartial manner; and WHEREAS, the city attempts to hire and employ people who can and will provide the best advice possible to the Council and who can and will serve the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota; The City Manager and staff are directed to develgp and transmit to this Council background information ~nd data based upon their experience and best judgment and are further directed to be honest and candid in .developing and transmitting said information, keeping in mind that their and our sole purpose is to serve the public interest. This Council pledges that no staff member shall suffer recrimination for acting in an honest and candid manner in protecting and promoting the public interest. This Council further states to its staff that the Coun- cil will carry out its responsibilities in the decision process as established by federal, state and local statutes, and' ordinances and will do so in a fair and impartial manner. Any city employee elected or ap- pointed, who is found to have transmitted to this Coun- cil information designed to promote their own financial interest or the financial interest of a friend contrary to the state statutes will be censored and prosecuted in accordance with the laws of this state and this city. The simple intent of this resolution is to remind each of us, Council and staff, that we are here to serve the public interest and not to promote or serve individual interests. In carrying forth this purpose, we (Council and staff) are dependent upon each other and must be in a position to be open, candid and honest with each other in transacting the city's business. 1 Be Se This resolution shall be kept on file in the City Clerk's office and shall be returned to the new City Council for consideration at the first official meeting each year. A copy shall be posted on the employees' bulletin board for a two-week period following its adoption. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 21-1989 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 260 TO THE CITY CODE CRE~TIN~ AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ~ ESTABLISHING ITS DUTIES THE CITY OF MOUND DOES ORDAIN: Section 260 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read as follows: Section 260 - Economic Development Commission Section 260:00. Establishment of Commission. An Economic Development Commission for the City of Mound is hereby estab- lished. The Commission shall be the City's Development Commis- sion and shall hereafter be referred to as "EDC". Section 260:05. Purpose. The purpose of the EDC will be to fur- ther the economic development of Mound; to aid, assist and promote the growth, expansion and development of business thereby to contribute to the economic well being of the area as measured by increased employment, payroll, business volume, tax base and corresponding factors. Section 260:10. Composition. The EDC 'shall ~onsist of' seven members. Six members shall be appointed by the City Council and any member may be removed by a four-fifths vote of the Council; the Council shall select one member of the Council to serve on the CommiSsion from among the Councilmembers, the said Council- member to be appointed for one year, commencing in January of each year; the City Manager shall be a member of the Commission ex-officio and without vote. On the terms of the members first appointed, two shall expire December 31, 1989; two shall expire December 31, 1990; and two shall expire December 31, 1991. Their successors shall be ap- pointed for terms of three years. Both the original and succes- sive appointees shall hold their office until their successors are appointed and qualified unless removed by a four-fifths vote of the City Council. The term of ex-officio member shall cor- respond with their respective office tenures. Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of his or her office. All members shall serve without compensation, but may be reimbursed for actual expenses if funds therefor are provided in the adopted city budget. No appointed member shall serve more that two con- secutive three.year terms. If a member is appointed to complete someone else's term, they may serve two additional three year terms. The qualifications of the members of the Commission shall be those who, in the judgment of the Council, are representative of the community and are qualified by training and experience and interest useful for the fulfillment of the Commission's respon- sibility in economic development. Section 260:15. Qrqanization, Meetinqs, Etc. At the first meet- ing of the year, the Commission shall elect its own Chairperson for a term of one year and each year thereafter. The Commission shall elect at its first meeting a Vice-Chairperson for a term of one year and each year thereafter. The Commission may create and fill such other offices as it may determine and create subcom- mittees as it deems necessary to accomplish its purpose. The Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each month at a time and place as agreed upon by its members. Section 260:20. Commission Staff. The Commission shall receive the staff services of the City Manager or his designee or other personnel as recommended by the City Manager. Section 260:25. Responsibilities. The EDC shall have as its number one priority goal the economic development of the City of Mound. In order to accomplish this goal, the EDC shall advise the City Council on actions it deems appropriate. The Commission shall: a) Promote the development and use of planned commercial, industrial and-business sites in the City. b) Provide information to realtors and lending institu- tions serving industrial, commercial or business clients. Cooperate with site relocation committees and in- .dustrial, commercial or 'business leaders seeking a location for new or expanded plant facilities. d) Cooperate with civic betterment agencies interested in promoting the potential of the City's labor force and industrial, commercial and business areas. e) Cooperate and coordinate the layout, preparation and · distribution of unsolicited industrial, commercial or business information from the City of Mound to prospec- .tive commercial, industrial or business clients. f) Review state legislation and local ordinances in order to determine how these regulations impact on local .economic development. g) Explore conventional and alternative methods of financ- ing for commercial and industrial development. h) Meet with and explore with local developers and busi- ness persons to learn their concerns and receive their input as to .how the economic climate can be improved. i) J) Meet with elected and appointed state and local offi- cials along with other appropriate resources it deems necessary in order to accomplish its goals. Advise the City Council of new legislation and or- dinances it would like to see adopted and/or amendments to the same which it feels will promote economic development. From time to time the EDC shall hold a joint meeting with the City Council so as to inform both groups of the others' efforts and to keep open the lines of communication. k) Undertake whatever other tasks the City Council finds it can be helpful with and which will enhance the area's economic development. Section 260:30. Powers. a) The EDC shall have no power to make contracts, levy taxes, borrow money, or condemn property, but shall have the full power and responsibility to investigate the necessity and recommend the taking of these and any other actions related to the industrial and commercial development by the Council and all other officers of the City responsible to formulate the ~erms of and the procedure for taking such action. b) To confer with and advise the Council and Planning Com- mission on all matters concerning the industrial, busi- ness and commercial development of the City. o) To publicize, with the consent of the Council, the in- dustrial and commercial advantages and opportunities of the City within the City provided by any appropriation made therefor by the Council. d) To collect data and information as to the type of in- dustries and commerce best suited to the City. e) To periodically survey the overall condition of the City from the standpoint of determining whether the City has a community climate for economic development and to determine the general receptiveness of the City to particular types of industry, commerce or business. f) To provide the Council with information as to the general advantages and disadvantages of industrial and commercial development in the community. g) To cooperate with all industries and businesses in the City in the solution of any community problem which they may have and to encourage the expansion, develop- ment and management of such industries and businesses so as to promote the general welfare of the City. h) i) To cooperate with all community groups and civic or- ganizations within the City and to furnish them with such aid and advice as deemed appropriate. To develop, compile, coordinate and publicize with available funds, information, such as, but not limited to the following: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Existing industrial and commercial concerns within the City, their addresses, types of businesses, number of employees and whether each serves local, regional or national markets. 14. Available industrial and commercial sites includ- ing number of acres, approximate price, existing zoning and proximity to major and minor arterial roads. 15. Available buildings for industrial and commercial operations, including type of building, number of square feet, existing zoning and proximity to major and minor arterial roads· Transportation facilities, including motor car- riers, air transportation and highway facilities. Electric power available. Funds.available for industrial and commercial use. Sewage disposal facilities. Water supply facilities. Community facilities such as fire, police and education. Recreational facilities. .Wage rates of unskilled, skilled, semiskilled and white collar workers. Availability of labor. General community attitude toward industrial and commercial expansion, development and attraction. Experience and programs of surrounding suburban communities in regard to industrial and commercial expansion, development and attraction. To recommend to the Council and Planning Commis- sion policies and particular actions in regard to industrial and commercial expansion, development, and attraction. 16. To cooperate with and use the facilities of the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. Attest: Mayor city Clerk Adopted by the City Council Published in the official newspaper date 5 Minne~t~ State Depar~men~ ~f Agriculture AGRONOMY SERVICES DIVISION 90 WEST PLATO BOULEVARD SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA TELEPHONE= (612) 296-612) NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR CITY OR TOWNSHIP INSTRUCTIONS 1) COMP£ETE THIS FORM IN TRIPLICATE. Al O~IGI~AL TO THE ATTENTION OF THE SECTION OF WEEP CONTROL AT THE ABOUE APPRE$$. E) FIRST COPY TO YOUR COUNTY AGRICULTURAL )~SPECTOR. C) SECO~P COPY TO YOUR LOCAL CLERK. · NA~E OF PERSON APPOINTED Jame$'Fackler - APPOINTMENT LOCATION . ~DDRESS CITY OR TO~'NSHIP NAHE 5341 ~aywood Road Mound CIT), STAlE~ ZIP CODE COUIITY Mound) MN. 5536~ Hennepin TELEPHONE ~0. ()~CLUPE A~EA COPE) IDATE OF APPOIHTHENT 612-472-1155 2-14-89 IN ACCORDANCE ~'ITH MINNESOTA STATUTES ~8.Z)l, PARAGRAPHS ~ AND ), PERTAINING TO ASSISTANT ~EED INSPECTORS, THE ABOVE-NAHED PERSON IS HEREBY APPOINTED TO BE ASSISTANT ~EED INSPECTOR FROH THE DATE ~NDICATED UNTIL SUCH TIHE AS THE MAYOR OR TO~N BOARD ~'ISHES TO TERHINATE THE APPOINTMENT. THIS APPOINTHEHT CONFERS ON THE APPOINTEE ALL THE DUTIES, AUTHORITY, AND PRIVILEGES OF ANY LOCAL ~'EED INSPECTOR AS OUTLINED BY LA~'. SIGNATURE ~MA~0R OR CHAI~ OF TO~S~)P BOA~PJ lilLE DAlE SIGNED i ~yor 2-14-89 SIR£ET AUDRESS CIlY AND STATE ZIP CODE 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN. 55364 AC-00167-02 pHONE NO. 6L2~/296-75~3 STATE OF ~ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL 1200 Warner Road., Sr. Paul, ~. 55106 DNR PROTECTED WATEP~ PEP~iT APPLICATION P_=QUEST FOR P~--ViEW R.=SOURCE5 Ft~ ~0. TO: z--ROM: J-CDY BOUDF-~AU, AILEA EI'DROLOGIST .~-_~--R0 REGION DIVISION OF'WATERS WATEP. S ~_-.-FEC~--ED_: PROJECT SPONSOP.: NATUF~E OF L-98 AN EQU,-~L OPPORTUNITY =MPLOYER PERMIT APPLICATION I:)EPART/C,,ENT OF . - ..... TO'WORK IN PROTECTED WATERS OR WETLANDS NATURAL RESOURCES IINCLU~IlI~ ball 1~ ~'Piease read instructions before attempting to complete this application Appilcant s Name ~ast. First. M.I,) IAumor~zed Agent (d applicable) ~daress (Street, R~. Box Number, O~, State, Z~p OFFICE USE ONLY IDA NO i=SWCD =C'C I F'-) W.D. F'"'I USCOE Telephone Number&area cc - ]1'7oo /A/',gCTD, LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (BE SURE TO INCLUDE SKEW'CH SHOV¢tNG HO',*,/TO GET TO THE SITE) Government Lot(s) Qu?,?! ~,,ec?onts) Sectipn_(s) No. Township(s) No. JRangels)No. ILot. Block. Subaiv~smn F~re No.. Box No. or Project Addrass g:L,¢'~, iCounty IPr°tect w,llaftect.~'/La~.e. DWetlandor~Watercourse "" ,,"' marne & number ~YPE OF WORK PROPOSED (CtLIECK ONE) IV. TYPE OF PROJECT (CHECK ONE) ~...excavate [] repair [] fill [] remove :] drain [] abandon [] construct D other (specify) [] install .~shoreline [] shore-protection [] obstruction [] dam [] channel [] harbor [] bridge [] other [] sand blanket [] permanent dock ,~ culvert (specify) [] riDraD [] wharf ESTIMATED PROJECT COST-' $:--~' --' _'?. _2_-- VI;LENGTH OF SHORELINE- AFFECTED(IN EEET).'.F ]_¢::~'_2 . VOLUME OF MATERIAL FILLED OR EXCAVATED (IN CUBIC YARDS):- - ~0 1 BRIEF EXPLANATION OF PROJEC;"~(EXPLAIN WHAT PROJECT CONSISTS OF AND HOW WORK WILL BE.DONE)~. tA/~ An'l~ ZCF__ ~-o,WPt.~l~b /rd 77¢F__ ~/tAJr~...~_ ,xA~f) F/75E 5P~/c. ,zC~,,c.z_ I PURPOSE OF PROJECT: (Explain why this project is needed) . __ ] .... ALTERXAflVES (Other a~e~na/iVes:-.tb:tDe action proposed)== ;u-;:= ..-~.:::-,.:v~:.-:~..-- I hereDy make apphcat~on pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 105.42 and all supporhng rules for a permit to work ,n or afte~ ,*ne above name0 protected waterfs) in accordance wdh all supporting maps. plans, and other informaDon submitted w~th this application The reformation submitted and statements made concerning th~s application are true and correct tO the best of my knowledge. ~' ~ STATE OF C0U~T~ Subscribed and sworn to before me th,s ~ /:,4,,'~-.-,-¢-, D!stribution: /7 .. ======================================== .... . - - White' DNR I ~ JUDITH E. NICCUM Z F4.,;.---~.~ ' '=~ ......... ' 'N--' " ~reen: wa'[.,sheQ UlStrlC! · ~denod. Gl or Ooun z ......................................Z wnK: Army L;orps of Engineers- ~ NATURAL RESOURCES Section I (To t~e completeg Dy aDplJcatlt) LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT COMMENTS NA-02670-04 Rev. PART B Nam, e of Apphcant Prol~t will affect: (name and num~ of lake, wetland, or watercourse) I(markherebyproperSUbmitbox)this application for permit to: Sign~je~Ap~ant ~ appropriate w~ter ~ work in protected waters X ~~ IAdOress (Street, RFD. Box No.. City, State, Zip Code) lRange(s) tCoupty(les) Section II (To De completed by local unit of government). "The following local unit of government comments and/or recommendations are submitted for consideration bythe Department of Natural Resources, in the disposition of the referenced permit application. (YOUR RESPONSE MUST BE - -SUBMITTED TO THE DNR WITHIN 30 DAYS.) Water Appropriation Permit Applications are to be sent to tl~e Central Of- fice, St. Paul, and Protected Waters Permit Applications to the DNR Regional Office. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CORRECT MAILING ADDRESSES). ~ O~T o ~: ~oo,ub, 'PP----t~Tz4/oOI~ 5/,,o~.¢..% o. urCoT 2/ 'T¢4¢.¢'¢/ F0~,¢7-~_ W~s the proposed project field inspected by this local unit of government? r-]NO [Viewer's Name 1Title I ,rized Signature · ITitle []YES (if Yes. give viewer's name) Name of responding Soil and Water Conservation District, Watershed District, City or County L~ II Address (of the above named local unit of government) (DNR -- Division of Waters addresses on back) T (/) , ¢"/ 0 0 Iii _-_-.!i 7 9?9.4 26 26 24. E NOHW / I ~o~ v~ 929.4 28 26 24 ~ NOHW HORIZONTAL 1"= 10' DREDGING SECTIONS-JOHN NELSON MINNETONKA 'PORTABLE DREDGING 1/17/~9 C 'T ! OF ' . .0. · )1" II RI(. IV 88 *Z 9 'IV LAKE MINNETONKA I -'. CITY OF MOUND NCY3ND, MINNESOTA MAINTENANCE PER?~T For ContinuinD the Present Use of a Structure or Improvement on Public Lands or Commons ~:_~z..~zss qqq'q PHONE Do you h?ve mn improvement or structure on Public L~nds or Commons? IktO · If '.'as, list them: , ~'i'-~?".-.}-.:ii'i '- . .~.. :..~:-- ~ ~:.~..s or co:._~,~o?,~s/~_'rc ~=~ 'ItP_i~'T'Okt '~W~: " " '" F~.s a p,rmit issued %o ~u[horize the construc[ion of thi~ improv~n~ or. s~ru? t~r~? ~ . ~ ~es~ month ~nd year: AP~_!C~2;iT MUST FURNISH THE FOLLOWING: 1. Copy of permit issued to authorize constr6ction.. ' ' - One plot plan drawn to scale' showing dimensions of the structure/ improvement .and location of same. .. One set of plans, and specifications of sufficient clarity and d~tail to indicate thc nature and extent of the structure or improvement. Show foundation·plan~ floor pt~n~ front and sid~ elevation~ wall and roof section detail. '' Photographs of existing structure/ improvement. P::cRX CO>~[ISSION RECO?R'~NOAT~ON: DATE 6-.9-88 'Table.fl- 12-8-88 Tab'led,:.~':-~7'. 1 - 12-89 Den i ~ .': CC:3)3C'n__ AC'~IO.W: RF~5 Q_.UT ION NO. DATE 2-14-89 FZLLOW-UP ACTION: c/IF CiCv o~ Mound 534i Maywood Rd. Moutnd, MN 55364 Dear Park Commissioners: We would appr ~',ci ate your ~ avorabl e acti on on the ~ol lowing requests: i. Cor~struct a 48" X 48" concrete pad at the shoreline in place ~-~ the plywood starter section ~or my dock. This pad will be centered on the current dock marker and include two 2" pipes ~rotuding 5" on the lake side ~or attachment to a Creapeau dock. which my dock extends for: a.')power ,Zor an irr'igation watering the small amount o~ lawn I have ~.~ to ensure ~a~ering o~ my area o~ the commons, b.)power {or requirements on my boat. c.)possible dock lighting. i have to run a long extension cord across the commons the irrigation pump or supply any power to the boat consider a safety hazard to people using the commons. The ~ill be done to code & use a ground ~ault interrupter breaker. This can be covered by my existing electrical ,,=~a~lation of 110 volt power outlet near the point ~rom pump ,Zor adequate the 1 iOV Currently to power which I wiring circuit permit. 3. Installation o~ a sprinkler system to use in conjuction with the irrigation pump that I now use & eliminate the hoses on the commons ~or safety & convenience in maintenance o{ my area the commons. 4. InstallatiOn of a ~resh water supply line terminating at the dock pad for the purpose ~ refi'lling the boat water tank & boat mainter, ance. This extention qrom the house ~ili have a shuto~ inside tk;e house & will be drainable to prevent freezing. An'-~ input you have would be greatfully appreciated. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Park Commission Minutes January 12, 1989 John Ned Dowt 4994 Manchestert BRIGHTON COMMONS: place altO volt outlet for a light on the co~m3ns. Request to The Park Director, Jim Fackler, was asked at the December 8, 1988 Park Commission meeting to report what is involved in installing a street light on Manchester, and how the neighbors would be fected opposed to installing the requested light. Fackler reported that no benefit to the dock holders would be gained by installing a street light, it would not provide enough light. Mr. Dow would place a light on his house it would serve Just as well as a street light. However, as Mr. Dow stated at the last meeting, the trees interfere with this lighting. The Com~fssion discussed the subject commons area and noted that there are no other obstructions on this commons. The Dock In- spector reported there are 11 abutting dock users and 6 non abut- ting, which in turn could result in 10 more reguests for lights tf this were approved] Weber asked if the City would be liable if a child happen to be electrocuted from this outlet, or injured from any structure on the commons. The.City Manager agreed that the City could be li- able.=. Dangers which' could arise from have an Outlet on lakeshore commons were discussed. The Commission noted that Brighten Commons is a pure commons, it presently has no structures or lights, and they would like to have it remain a pure commons. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Bally, to deny the request for a 110 volt ~tlet and a light to be constructed on Brighton Commons. Motion carried'unanimously. This case will appear before the City Council on February 14, 1989. Election of Officers for 1989 (Chair and Vice-Chair) MOTION made by Bailey to re-elect Nancy Clough as Chair for 1989. Nancy Clough informed the Commission she did not wish to be re- elected as chair. Burke and Bailey also expressed that they did not wish to be appointed as Chair. The Commission discussed ap- pointing a new member as Chair. It was determined the Commission would vote at the February 9, 1989 meeting when the other members were in attendance. MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION MEETING Decmber 8, 1988 Present were: Chair Nancy Clough; Commissioners Linda Panetta, Shirley Andersen, Steve Burke, Cathy Bai ty and Marl tyn Byrnes; Council Representative Phyllis dessen; City Manager Ed Shukle: Dock Inspector Dell Rudolph, and Secretary Peggy James. Also present was the Following interested person: Mr. Ned Dow. Chair called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. 1. Minutes The minutes oF the Park Commission Meeting oF NOvember ]0, 1988 were presented For changes or additions: MOTION made by deSsen, seconded by Panetta, to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Rectuest for concrete pad on shoreline: John Ned Dow, BRIGHTON COMMONS. 4994 Manchester,. Mr. Dow was oresent and informed the Commission he is changing his original request, he referred to his letter dated June ], 1988 with the Four original items and stated he wou'ld like to delete items ], 3, & 4. His only request is For temporary in- stallation of a IlO volt outlet for a light. The light will be placed near the point From which his dock extends, and wiring will be done to code with a ground Fault interrupter circuit breaker. Mr. Dow stressed the light was-For safety purposes, and commented his boat and other boats in the area were broken into last summer-. "Temporary" means if the City ever needed it to be removed, he would., it would be removable. It was taken under consideration that everyone else who uses Brighton Commons may want lights by their docks too. The Commis- sion agreed they did not want to see a string of lights along this Commons area. Park Commisslon December 8, 1988 The Commission processed Mr. Dow's request using the Flow chart. When the question "Will it enhance and encourage' the use by the general public?" was asked, the Commission had mixed reactions. Some members believed it would help dock users and swimmers to have a light, and some members believed the general public would not benefit anO the applicant would be the only one to benefit due to the proposed location at the base of his dock. The Commission suggested installing a street light which would help light up this area, and it would serve the general public not only the applicant. ' M~13NI I1~ by Bally, seconded by Andersen, For the Park Director to investigate what is Involved in installing ~treet lighting on Manchester, and how would the neighlDors be affected opposed to installing the requested light. Mr. Dow informed the '~ommission he does 'not wa~t a street' light, a street light would not allow enough light to the lake because there are trees along the lakeshore. The proposed location of the light was discussed, Mr. Dow ex- plained, using a copy of a survey on his'property, where the .light would be located, and he showed them where the trees are. The City Manager explained the process For obtaining a street light. The person applying Files a petition, the poi ice depart- ment does a survey with the neighbors and submits a report to the City Council. The light is installed by NSP with a base Fee and ~aintained with a cost to the City of $6 to $7 per month. The Dock Inspector informed the Commission, presently there are no private lights on this particular commons. MOTION carried unanin~3usly. The Commission expressed concerns about making decisions without set policies. e Comments on ~_e~est for Renewal of Existin~;l Mana~men___~t_ ~o__licy and ._OJaerattn9 Procedures For Gra~_'s Bay Headwaters C~rol Structure. ' ...... The City l~nager reported on the existing Management Policy For the Gray's Bay dam which is due to be presented For renewal to the DNR. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District would like com- ments, if any, on this policy. Presently the lake level is 926.0. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN NED DOW LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA /5.8 I hereby certi-fy that this is a true and a correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 12, Block 33, WYCHWOOD, and the location of ill existings buildings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. Scale: 1" : 30' Date : 4-16-87 o : Iron marker ~: Spot elevation Datum: Mean Sea Level COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lic. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 89- P~ESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE M3~YOR /~ND CITY M/%N~GER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE LOAN OF PBT'S (PORTABLE BREATH TESTERS) FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mound will enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety for the purpose of receiving from the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, preliminary breath test instruments on a loan basis for use by law enforcement officers to assist in the detection of motorists who may be in violation of Minnesota Statutes Section 169.121, or local ordinances in conformity therewith. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute such agreement (marked Exhibit A and attached hereto). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Counc$1members voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY January 27, 1989 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 1~46 University Avenue St.. Paul, Minnesota 55104-4197 61~/64~-0610 Len Harrell, Chief Mound Police Department 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Chief: The September 1987 Portable Breath Tester (PBT) survey has given the Department of Public Safety the information necessary to purchase a limited number of Alco Sensors. Your agencies response to the survey make you eligible to receive one of the Alco Sensors. I have enclosed the necessary documents to accomplish this task. You will find a sample resolution which must be passed by your governing body, a copy of the agreement 'for the loan of PBT's and instructions on completing these documents. When the resolution is passed, the officials authorized by it can complete %he agreement. This together with a certified copy of the resolution passed by your governing body must be returned to the Forensic Science Laboratory. Once .we receive the'agreement and resolution we will be able to schedule one or more officers from your department fOr the necessary training and at that time we will issue the instrument to you. You will note that on page three of the agreement we have indicated the number of instruments this agreement is permitted to cover. We will onl.y be able to distribute one unit per department at this time. By having the agreement cover the total number that your agency indicated on the survey the agreement will cover future units if they become available. When complete, please return all'documents to the BCA-Forensic Science Laboratory, Breath Test Section~ If you have any questions contact Bob Mooney, or Eldon Ukestad at 612-642-0760.. Sincerely yours,~ Lowell C. Van Berkom Director Forensic Science Laboratory Encl. LCV:ds INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY BREATH TESTER AGREEMENT THE RESOLUTION: There are three forms of sample resolutions, one for city recipients, one for County recipients and one generic form where the agency governed by a joint police commission or some other form of governing body. If the resolution passed is different in wording from the sample, be certain it contains the following essential points: l) to empower the local government to enter into a agreement with the State according to the terms of the agreement. 2) to designate at least one and preferably two officials to execute the agreement. More than two may be desiganted if desired. 3) the phase "hereby are authorized to execute such agreement" should be included at the appropriate point. Lines ten and eleven of the sample resolution contain blanks which should be filled with the titles of the officials empowered to execute the agreement. Names of specific individuals should be avoided. For a city government recipient it is most practical if the officials designated are the City Clerk, and the Chief of Police or Mayor. For a County government, recipient the County Auditor and County Sheriff would be most practical. These officials are suggested because the annual certification statements are usually sent to a Clerk or County Auditor and because the instruments will in most cases be in the possesion of your Police Department or Sheriff's Office. THE AGREEMENT: Once the resolution has been passed, the designated officals titles should be entered on the "title" lines of the recipient sign off section on the ieft hand column of page three. These officials shouldthen sign the "By" lines of the sign off section. The complete agreement and a certified copy of the resolution should be sent to: Forensic Science Laboratory Breath Test Section 1246 University Ave. St. Paul, MN 55104 Once the complete agreement and certified copy of the resolution are received we wi1! contact your department about scheduling training and delivery of the instruments. The training session takes one to two hours and covers operation, maintenance and calibration of the instruments. This session is certified for one hour P.O.S.T. credit so the person or persons attending should be certain to bring their P.O.S.T. license number. When documents have been signed by the appropriate State of Minnesota officials, a copy of the complete agreement will be returned to the City, County or other local government body. Any questions about the documents or requests for information or assistance may be directed to the Breath Test Section at the above address or by phone at 612-642-0760. AGREEmeNT FOR THE LOAN OF PRELIMINARY BREATH TEST INSTRUMENTS WITNESiETH: WHEREAS the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety (hereinafter referred to as "DPS") has received grants of money through section 402 of the Fedmral Highway and Traffic Safety Act of 1966. or through other sources for the purchase of preliminary breath test instruments; and WHEREAS D?S desires to provide a mechanism through which local law enforcement agencies may use these preliminary breath test instruments to assist them in the detection of drivers who a~e in violation of Minnesota laws relating to t~affic and highway safety, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN DPS and the local government unit designated as nRecipient, on page 3 of this agreement (hereinafter ~eferred to as tRecipient.)as follows: I. DPS's ~esDonsibilitigS. A. DPS shall make available to Recipient up to the number of preliminary breath test instruments (PBTs) specified on page 3 of this agreement, the exact number of instruments supplied to be determined by'DPS subject to availability of funds and instruments. Recipient shall use and have possession of these instruments but DPS shall retain title and legal ownership of them. B. Any'and all repairs shall be made by or at the direction of DPS. If funding is available, DPS'shall pay for the cost~ of maintenance and repair or replacement due to normal wear and tear resulting from routine proper use of the instruments. C. DPS shall train at least one person designated by Recipient in the proper handling and use of these instruments. DPS shall provide this training without cost for the training itself. D. DPS shall maintain all necessary state and federal inventory control records on these instruments. II. ReciDient's Responsibilities. A. Recipient shall use the instruments provided under this agreement to assist in enforcing Minnesota laws relating to traffic and highway safety. B. Recipient shall keep and maintain the instruments in proper operating condition. Recipient shall supply all disposable components for the instruments at Recipient's expense. C. Recipien~ shall be responsible for the cost of repairing or replacing instruments which, in the opinion of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, have been damaged due to abuse, misuse, or other cause outside the scope of normal wear and tear in routine proper use. Recipient shall also be responsible for the costs of maintenance and repair resulting from normal wear and tear in routine proper use of these instruments if funding for such maintenance and repair is not made available to DPS. inoperable, malfunctioning or no longer in use. Such Instruments to be delivered or shipped to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Laboratory, postage and h~ndling charges prepaid. u E. Recipient shall not permit the instruments to be tampered with or operated by individuals who ape not trained in their operation. F. Recipient shall designate at least one person to be trained by the DP$ in the proper handling and use of these instruments. Recipient shall bear the cost of any travel expenses incurred by any person attending such training. ~. The people trained by DPS in the proper use and band!lng of these instruments shall train other officers in their dep~tments in how to properly use end handle these instruments. H. Recipient shall make these instruments available to personnel authorized by DPS when required for inventory or inspection purposes. III. Term of A~reement. .. This Agreement shall take effect on the date ef final approval by the Commissioner of Finance and remain in effect until terminated by either of the p~rties as provided in sectio~ IV... This Agreement may be terminated by either DPS or Recipient at any time with or without cause, upon ten (10) d~ys written notice to the other p~rty. in the event of such termination, Recipient shall return all instruments that it has received pursuant to this agreement to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Laboratory within thirty (30) days after the termination of this Agreement. If Recipient fails to return the instruments within this time period, Recipient a~rees to pay the cost of replacement of the instruments. Recipient shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of DPS. Recipient agrees to indemnify and save and hold the State' of Minnesota, its agents, and its employees harmless from any and all claims arising from the use of these instruments or from the performance of this Agreement by Recipient or Recipient's agents or employees. VII. Relationship of Parties. Neither Recipient nor Recipient's agents or employees are to be considered to be agents of DPS or to be engaged in any ~oint venture or enterprise with DPS, and nothing herein shall be construed to create such relationship. - ....... IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be bound hereby, have caused this agreement to be duly executed. OF RECIPIENT: City Mound Shall ~e provided with up to one (1) preliminary breath testing instruments for use by the Mound Police Department For the RECIPIENT By: ..... Title: Date: . By: ..... Title: Date: STATE OF FffNNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION LAB Recommended for Approval: By: ..... Title :.__]~V~n Ber~. Direc~r Date: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY By: Title: Date: , Approved as to Form and Execution: ATTORNEY GENERAL: By:.., Date:.. CO~$1ISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION: By: Authorized Signature Date: APPROVED CO~R4ISSIONER OF FINANCE: By: Date: A certified copy of the resolution authorizing the Cit~ of .. ~ Mound to enter into this Agreement and authorizing the and to execute this Agreement must be attached hereto. LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 February 7, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Len Harrel~ South West Metro Drug Task Force Attached is a joint powers agreement for working with other police agencies in our area to combat drug use and sales. Officers from the task force group will be asked to assist one another in target- ing specific situations. Funding has been obtained through State and Federal monies, for- feiture funds, and local involvement. The task force operated very successfully in 1988, and has expanded to include Mound for 1989. RESOLUTION NO. 89- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FIAYOR ;tND CITY 14~%I~AGER TO ENTER INTO THE SOUTHWEST METRO TASK FORCE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the Southwest Metro Task Force Joint Powers Agreement (Exhibft A), attached hereto. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk SOUTHWEST METRO TASK FORCE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between Carver County, Scott County, South Lake Minnetonka, Chaska, Chanhassen, Shakopee, Mound, and St. Bonifacius-Minnetrista through their respective law enforcement agencies. WHEREAS, Minn. stat. 471.59 provides for the joint exercise of powers by two or more governmental units and specifically allows for joint exercise of police power; and WHEREAS, the Southwest Metro Task Force has been created by the parties for the interdiction of drug traffickers and street-level dealers in. the named jurisdictions~ NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises Contained herein, the parties agree as follows: I. PURPOSE ~ The purpose of the Southwest Metro Task Force is to provide a comprehensive and multi-jurisdictional effort to reduce drug trafficking and eliminate local street-level dealers through the coordination of law enforcement agencies. Once established and funded, the Task Force operations are to be coordinated by the South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department. ,Agents will be licensed police officers paid through the Task Force fund comprised of pooled local and federal monies. Agents will act as gathers of information. Offenses taking place in a specific jurisdiction will involve the prosecution of those individuals by that jurisdictions attorneY., Agents will have discretionary Dowers of arrest in all jurisdictions. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 471.59, subd. 12. agents licensed as Minnesota police officers may cross jurisdictional boundaries for the purpose of gathering information for the successful completion of their cases. II. FUNDING The Task Force is to be funded by a combination of.federal money, state money and forfeited money.. South Lake Minnetonka, on behalf of the parties, applied for and received a federal grant in the amount of Twenty-One Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-T~o and 40/100 Dollars ($21,932.40). The grant amount, plus a Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollar ($5,000.00) contribution from each municipality shall be transferred to South Lake Minnetonka for the admin'istration of the Task Force. Funds may be dispersed by S~uth Lake Minnetonka, for purposes including, but not limited to, pension payments, insurance and other costs, according to applicable State law and with. the agreement of the parties. The books, records and documents relevant to this Agreement shall be subject to audit by the parties or the State of Minnesota at reasonable times upon written notice. Strict accountability of all funds, receipts and disbursements shall be provided for. III. TERM This agreement shall commence February 1, 1989 and terminate January 31, 1990. IV. DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY All forfeitures of property, money and other assets will be divided equally among participating agencies at the termination of the program. Ail permanent equipme'nt purchased through the program shall be shared by the participating agencies on a need basis during and after program termination. V. LIABILITY All worker's compensation and civil liability claims will be ha~dled by the Jurisdiction in which the agent is employed. VI. GENERAL PROVISIONS This program is to be administered under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Crimihal Apprehension~ All.aCtivities are to be consistent w.ith and subject to the grant application (attached and incorporated by reference'),-as well as applicable state and local laws. Dated this day of , 1989 CARVER COUNTY SCOTT COUNTY BY: BY: DATED: SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA DATED: CITY OF CHASKA BY: DATED: BY: DATED: CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY OF SHAKOPEE DATED: CITY OF MOUND BY: DATED: ST.BONIFACIUS-MINNETRISTA BY: DATED: BY: DATED: For February 14, 1989 Council Meeting February 8, 1989 LICENSE RENEWAL -- Expire 2-28-89. New License Period 3-1-89 to 2-28-90. Approval contingent upon all required forms, insurance etc. being turned in. Garbage Disposal Blackowiak & Son Randy's Sanitation Westonka Sanitation Woodlake Sanitary Cigarette A1 & Alma's' American Legion #398 (Convenience Whlse Grocers-formerly Jude Tobacco) Ben Franklin Bob's Bait Shop Brickley's Market Duane's 66 (Convenience Whlse Grocers-formerly Jude Tobacco) Fina Serve #564 Mack's Jock Club Meyer's Mound Service Mtka Boat Rentals (Dean-Superior Vending) Mound Municipal Liquor (Convenience Whlse Grocers-formerly Jude Tobacco) PDQ Food Store #0292 SuperAmerica #4194 Thrifty Snyder Drug #704 Union 76 V~ #5113 (B & L Vending) Westonka Foods COMMERCIAL DOCK RENEWAL -- Expire 4-1-89. New License Period 3-31-89 to 4-1-90 A1 & Alma'~s Supper Club - 24 Slips in Water Minnetonka Boat Rental - 24 Slips in Water 18 Boats Stored on Land P&Z Ca~e #89-802 HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED STREET VACATION: UNNAMEO EXTENSION OF ARBOR LANE; SOUTHEASTERLY 12 FEET OF SOUTHWESTERLY 40 FEET. OF LOT i, SKARP & LINDQUIST'S RAVENSW(:X)O TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY gIVEN THAT the City Council oF the City oF Mound will meet at the City. Hall, 5341 May~ood Road, Mound, Minnesota, at 7:30 p.m. on the 14th day oF March 1989, to con- sider the vacation oF the Following: UNNAMED EXTENSION Of ARBOR LANE; SOUTHEASTERLY 12 FEET OF SOUTHWESTERLY 40 FEET OF LOT 1, SKARP & LINDQUIST'S RAVENSWOOD Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. Francene Clark, City Clerk ¥3? BILLS ..... FEBRUARY 14, 1989 BATCH 90t3 BATCH 9014 48,594.35 IOO,916.31 TOTAL BILLS 149,510.66 ..... :: .... T07:i :,q 95 !3,':-5 ") PFE-F'AiD 1,!.',t,26 LiB 7'.,-7100-75~.0 1i3i/~ 1i31/87 1,I61,26 ,JRHL-CD 1010 ' ~%L~SY C~.r~n~; ~:~4 VE~,~OR TOTAL ~-:,~.. ¢ B0610 PRE'PAiD 500,00 B~L [~UE-DEDUCTIBLE 22-2040-0000 I/3!/8~ 1/31/87 500.00 d~NL-CD 10!0 i16! .26 500.00 EOYER ~UCKS VB~-~ TOTAL 500,~) :,'77,t0 ........ r,-.::-r~:O 50,00 ~HITE ~LL~ REGiSTR-HAR~;~L 01-4140-4~!0 !/.:~!,:Y 1/31/87 50.~ Jr.~-C~ 1010 -" BL?,E~ OF n~N~; ........ ~ V~ TOTAL 5~),00 6C'.'~88 F'PE':'~rD :, ~.q7 ¢.0 'CR UNION OED 1/2! PR 1/ol/~.. ~/,,l/o? "=~" ~" : ,..,,,,vv JR,~l. -CD CiTY ~jNTY ~::,.~ u.i-ri t¢?LPDR TOTAL 25..,;".,7.00 C0920 .'-';'E-PAiD ,?0 :^~ ,'* t' ~,H 1... Y? A/P-F'-,~TTY ~/.:,~/,:,? I/3!/::.:? '20,~ 01-20~-~00 !0!0 71-7i0{~-'."'2C,0 71-2040-0000 !010 2.~7.00 ~.89 h PRE-PAI~ 36.!! R~:%B4 FETTY r .... ~' '~ ~ / .?.. ,' ::";' :: J!/.:~/ ..~..'"¢, ~I, 01-41.40-~00 L%.!: '~.04 , ..... v_~'~[6,~ TOT.::L I[~,04 ) CiTY CF "~'~;:~',~ "~ .... . 50.40 !/:31/8'? !/3!/$? CFJNTiNE~¢AL TELE=H¢_.'NE VEN;~CF( TOTAL 01219 PRE-PAiD i/:37i,79 2i3!/:?? DB_BE=.m'T RUDC£PH V~.4DO~ TOTAL !/31/87 1/3!/89 DEPT OF NAT!:RAL RESCURCES VENDOR TOTAL E14~ PRE-PAID 1/31/89 1/31/89 .PRE-PAiD ED PHiLLiPS & .%~-~ VEN[:OR TOT~ G1755 PRE-PAID 1/31/89 !/3!/89 OF, EAT ~EST ~.i~ ;~UR~CE VE?';':.SR TOTAL PF:E-PAID ~/~;~., .,,/;~'~., !/31/:?? ":':'*~',F ...... ,'r~ ~,~r, TOTAL ,o ~.',J~N TELE ~' 14 ..... TE"~E 60, IS', ,.,;,:,'^" TELE t.':'55,46 JAN '-''~ :~..'- ~"" '~':.' JAN ~LE ,,,...,':'"':,58 JAN TELE 5.58 ,a,, ,.~, .:, TE. LE 33,, 33 j'AN 2!?,12 dAN TELE ,,=7.41 dRNL-CD 1!27.41 188.13 21.5 CONTRACT H~]R$ 188.13 JRNL-CD 170.00 PROCESS FEE-88 WATER 170.00 JRXL-CD ' 17o.o0 !13.31 ~INE 1.83- DISC 111.48 ~R~-CD' - ~,:4.06 L!~ 3.35- DiSC !80.71 ~-CD 1,301.00 [;EF COMP DED t,~}1,00 J~,~_-CD t/21 PR 235,60 HO~ DED 1/2! PR 235.60 dRhL-CD 235.60 4.~5.79:4iNE ii.67- !?.35 F,~T !47.55 571,22 JRNL-CD ,.,"' ~. - 42:.-':':) -72'2 :: 73-730':}-S2£0 /,_-,-. 22-4170-$2£0 71-7100-3220 0i'4320-3220 0 t -40;0'3220 01-40'.-.'5-3220 0I-4!40-3220 01-11~0-0000 1010 81-43~0-3100 1010 73-2040-0000 1010 71-7100-~20 71-7100-~60 1010 71-7100-95!0 .71-71(~-~60 1010 01-2040-00¢~) 1010 01-2040-0000 !0!0 71-7100-7520 71-7100-P560 71-7!00-7600 71-7!00'9540 !010 11,7.4! 170.00 111.48 180.71 1301.00 59! .22 -] ,_-.~.,_-.:J: C:::'EF: .',., -~'~:""' '-,,'.:t/:'-:?::.:;/,:~'"' - ?-°-,~,ID :::" ;':"~ t13~t8'? !CMA "~'""~ ....D]F.P ~.~,:.~, TOTAL F~.~'-, ·/..',. ;..~: !2:}?0; F'R[-?A!D [SFS! V~.~R TOT~L ,JOHN T~F: VD. rOOR TOTAL .t.:~-' i ¢, i ~.-]2. (.',7 171..~3 P,c~' i/2! F.:,' 555,43 "~ 475.20 AI~rAnz ~,~ 475.20 dRNL-CD~' 475.20 I90.00 REO!STR- ISFS i-HBIDR, ER':CKS 190.00 JF~L-CD !?0.00 240~00 2~0,00 2,~.00 9~.28 LiQ 14%77 WiNE 21.24- DiSC 1,424.05 LiQ 527.85 WINE ~.75o DISC 1,917.75 ~h~-CD 3023.76 ~.~ REG!S~-~YD 44.00 40,00 1,!~.47 1,I~.47 JR~-CD 1!75.49 140.05 ~A DEB 1/51 PR 140.05 .~?'L-CD NO.05 o._-_'.- 0 t-204:)-'.'.!0~::0 01-2070-C' },::(} I t". 10 55-5.4:3 Oi-~iO-41iO 10!0 4~,20 ~-q70-4110. 1010 IO~O 2.4.0.00 71-71C~-9510 7!-7100-9520 ,1-,.O0-.~O 1010 7i-7!00-~5!0 7!-7100-9520 71-710Q-95.6~ 1010 ,.to,01 1717.95 ~2-4170-4t10 I010 44.00 01-20~-0000 1010 Ii,,'5.~? 01-2C~0-0000 !0:0 :i0.05 C ! :',.' .'F .) ) xS63'., FRE-FAiD VE~,Z.~R TOT:~L 1/3:/87 i!3!187 ~ .:~'cF~ L:FE VED~DR TOTAL PRE'PAiD !/31/87 i/31/8~ PRE-BAlD ~. LEAGUE OF CITIES V'"eiDOR TOTAL ~.-~,,.-,00 F~E-~ID' 1/31/89 1/3~/89 N~-~.P,N STATES ?OW~ ~ V~'.~OR TOTAL PS950 PRE-PA[D i/3!/87 1/31/8~ P E R A Velar TOTAL ~4030 PRE-BAiD 1/3!/~B 1/31/8~ ~YS!C!A~ OF MN V~ TOTAL P~03! PRE-DA!D PHYSIC!~NS OF ~N ~'~OR TOTAL F?Z~TiAL I~SCFsaNCE ~PA V~.~ TOTAL 34171 JF.:D'iL-:3 ?.3 i.:.:-~ ,.~ ~'~ . '..'.. ~A:'~L- :.~J -"'~.',P.,~, ,'I,~L FJ~ 1/21 F'R ,524.06 ~2¢,06 440.00 NLC 44~. r~O .... .... 2~0,00 NLC REGISTR-~HNSOa ~0.00 ~NL-CD ~60. O0 ! ! ! ;67 DEC, 11~.$7 JR~L-CD 11!.67 5,~4,06 P~A 1/2! DR 5,824.06 JRNL-CD 5,q?. ~, 6,3!7,05 HOSP ~ 1/21 PR 266.00 HOSP DED RETIREE 65~.05 3!7,20 dAN-F'~ H~-M THARALSON 317.20 177.76 LIFE INS DED !/21 PR !77,T6 .~.-CD 1~.76 !,838.13 LiD I?~,6.5 WINE 38,80- DiSC 5,..~0 MIX 73-7300<:,2: 0 10!0 !0!0 01-44.0-4, ,¥ 1010 0'1~204<9F0000 I010 01-2040-0C~0 .I010 0!-2040-00C~ 01-4140-!510 i010 0!-41~-1510 1010 01-204.0-0',X:0 7!-7109-9510 7!-7!00-75:9 7!-71C~-95~4] 7!-7100-1~5~) 1010 4¥J.CO0 2~.00 Iu.67 5~4.06 317,20 177.76 ') '~-~,-~ ..... .&:~ '-.--..:~ ',=',-:.~,~ TOTAL ~', .,,;0 ~/3!/,"]? i/3 ~/',_":9 STATE C~ ,~N-~C~J,'~..-,~,~ VENDDR TOTAL ~,~.~; ! rm.~-r~D ~/.~/o~ 1/3~/S9 STATE CAPITOL S4630 · ~,.~ TQT~L !,~S . VD'~OR TOTAL ~20 !/:'.-:I/87 I ':¢~ 8'~ ~u,~L ~I_L ' -~ .... 3430.~0 1022'?,47 373,50 Cu~ 373.50 ~NL-CD 01-414,.)-~0 t010 373.50 4!8.6,0 ~ UNION DED 1/21 PR 01-2040-00C~ 41,..60 JR~.I-CO !0i0 418.~ 418.60 4~.60 4.55~60 4.~.a.60 A/P, DEC GAS 01-2040-00~)D 4.~.60 5.28 b~3-RET'u'RN SHADE 5.~ "~'~ umW-CD I010 5.~ 5.~8 8.00 CHAMBER LL)~CH 01'4040.,-41~ 8.00 D~MBER L~N%H 01-41~-41~ 16.00 ,JNL-CD 1010 16.00 16.00 /J'~J ,2.. q/oD- ':) .) AiR ~ INC AO150 AL GEROU} WE1.DI~ AOX9 A0410 VE~OR TOTAL 2/:~789'2/09/$S' V~DP~ TOT~ 2109189 2109/89 VENDOR TOTAL 2/09/89 2/09/8S A~N CF METROPOLIg; ~?~iC~ ~LEN, D~ TOTAJ. A043! 2/0'?/S9 2/09/89 ~A CA~ CLS_ANI~G ~?~ TOTAL B0500 . 2/0~./87 2/09/89 ¢='(~,. TOTAL &/L~Y/07 -"'/...7I V~'L~gR :%'... 00 30, ()!) 30,00 !9.25 27.07 !9.25 65.57 64.98 !8.81 111 7 11.97 6.8; 18.81 11.~7 25.&5 171.00 171,00 REhT .....r- .... ~u-, JF::;L-CD t3~ 8.EMENT PLAQUE,BATTERY C~A~OER !~M ~.EM~NT JR)'~_-CD RADIO S~V!CE CONTRACT ~DIO S~VICE CO~fFRACT RADIO S~VI~ CDN~ACT RADIO S~VICE ~,RA~T RADIO SERVICE CON~ACT RADIO S~VICE ~NTRACT RADIO S~VICE C~N~ACT PJD!O SE~iCE ~NTRACT JR)~-CD 100.00 A/P-TIRE & W~EL i00;00 u~NL-CO 100,00 344.00 .TIRE PIO~,I]P-RECYCLING 344.00 JRN1.-CD 5.00 ~H BR~AST 5.00 dRNL-CD 7.-~.00 (]_EAN REC~T. 35.00 dRY,L-CD 35. O0 319.90 ~F~l.E]~,-82 Pi~<UP 319.90 7.50 JAN OXYCEN 7.50 JAN OXYC~4 !2.50 JJN OXYGEN 27.50 J~L-CD 01 '4.::'2C;-:22'::8 01-4Cz0-£100 01-41;0-2100 "' ~"F'? ',i"':' 1010 0!-42E:0-3950 0!-4340-3750 01-4190-~50 01-4290-3750 73-73~0-39~ 78-7500-3950 1010 0!-20~0-0000 01-4270-~2~ 1010 01-4020-41~ !010 73-7300-4200 01-4340-~!0 1010 73-72~>)-22C,0 78-7300-22~0 1010 -.) x .) C, ~.N STEP CG~T TO ~AST C~70 ?'}=. -9- 20.58 72.66 72.66 8.99 18,99 7.90 5.69 ' 3.00 · -17.86 15.68 29, 75 46.74 11.64 40.15 41.93 145.73 62.12 : 11.43 2/...~/8"? 2/09/89 467.60 V~-P~]R TOTAL 2,'!~/g9 2/09/G9 C~ ~ BOT1Z,':a]-MI[~ST V~R TOTAL S1010 2/~9/89 2/09/89 ~M~ICAT!D'~ ~lT~ v~,~OR TOTAL ClICk} ~/.s./o, .. C~'f C~K!CATI?~ F'~:i:~TS VEND~R TOTAL Di200 467.60 144.~ 144.50 144.50 72.73 72,73 !8.80 ,8.00 4,092.17 4,092.17 409"2. I7 ~,RNu-~D JAN SUPPLIES JAN SUPFLiES-COFF;: BUTLER JAN Sb?PLIES- dAN SUPPLIES- JAN Sb~PLIES- JAN SUPPLIES- dAN Sb~PLIES-D3FFEE MAK~ dAN SIJPPLIES-CONT~T JAN SUPPLIES- dAN SUPPLIES- dAN Sb~PLIES- dAN SUPFLIES- 'dAN SUPPLtES-TOCLS JAN SUPPLIES- dAN SUPPLIES- jI~A.-CD JAN MIX JD~.-CD ~A!R PAG~ JR~-CD JAN Ct]Pi~ M~iNT dAN JDL-CD 71-,': uO-.:,-v ! ,.'J i 0 Oi-i~ 320-;2!0 !010 01-4! 90-~./~£J 01-4020-~t';0 Z0.-4170-~00 O1-4340-2200. 01-4340-2310 01-4~0-~00 01-4040-~C~3 :01-~40-2100 Ol 01-4~3-~00 01 - 4~-~-22.00 . 01-4~0-2250 73 -7300-23(X) 73-7~0-~00 78-78C~-2200 I010 7!-7100-'~ I010 ~-4170-32C<) i0!0 73-7300-~P50 I010 7!-7100-95S0 !010 -) GiXIE FEi;,u-u,,::', I?';C , ...... n TOTAL .-'~,..~, BRYCE EAST SIDE BEVE;JCE E!430 EDWARD SHUk~_E E1485 :':'"~'..' TOTAL ...ti. ?jO.'. VD~OR TOTAL ~ ~, i' - ,.,, O,/,..9 VE,'~R TaTAL 2/09,/89 2/09/89 EgUIPMENT SUPPLY F1690 TOTAL 2/09/89 2/~)/89 YObl~ STAR BAR ,~PPLY ' VENDOR TOTAL F1711 FF~ANCKo ~UCKINO F~7,0 2/09/89 VIR~DOR, TOTAL FI725 F?I'D FRYOR SE~!NARS Gi~9 2/09/~ VE)~DOR TO i. ~ 2/09/89 2/09/89 VDSOR TOTAL 2/09!';~ :i09/89 CiTY 63. CO 63.00 4!%00 417.00 4,010.65 4!.15 4,051.80 4o51~8o 35.02 35.02 229.24 ~9.24 ~.72 67.~2 67.92 160.0~ 160.0~ 99,00 79.00 ~,00 ~19.00 [E~C~iPTiSN AlP CHIEF SALARY JN" JRNL-CD JAN MTGS JOE-CD HEATi~ REPAIR JAN MIX ~ MiSC JR~L-CD JN FRT ~-CD A/P ,NEGOTIATIONS NEGOTIATI~S JRNL-CD ~9INAR-HYLA. ND J)L-CD A/P-MOBIL RADI~ ~,,Nl.-uD JAN MARSHALL SALARY ~)L-CD 71-7100-'7530 71 71,,0 ....... i0~0 01-4040-4120 I010 01-4~0-3~ 1010 71i7100L9540 71-7100-.~t~-wO 1010 71-7100-96(~ 1010 O1-20~}-Or~'~ 01-4~9-41~ 1010 01-4140-4110 I010 73-,:04u-oor.,lj 1010 ~-4170-1370 10!0 .) GtglO ~ODIN COMPANY G1730 TOTAL ~%~ TRAINING ..... ~'n-- ~;,¥ ,.~o VE?IDOR TOTAL H2120 2/09/89 2/09189 H=~N CO GEPT OF FiqOP~:T'f T '~D'JR TOTAL 21~/89 2/(~t89 I~IN CO TREASU;'ER VE~LOOR TOTAL H2160 , 2!07/89 2/0918~ HD'~N CO ~'.~F~R V~ TOTAL 2/09/8? 2/09/89 J2629 JJL!E CL'F)E KA~ ~/,.,,-., .:.., 2;¢0'?/89 VD,'DOR TOT¢,L .... ~ ~ s JA."~ ..... ' .~, ,... :JATEF; 30.,':0d~.'~ '4ATER 6,.'B::', JAN ~,~ATE,'-: COCL~i ~ ~-"'~ dAN '"'r-~ '~ .... ' 2.84 jAN ~ATF,R COOLER 73,35 JRNL-CD 40,4:3 40.43 40;43 790.00 REID COUn;c-,~X,HUGGETT 165.00 REID c .... n ~URo:-LOTToN 955.00 JRNL-CD ?55,00 5.10 JAN POSTAL VERiF 5. i0 JF;~&-CD ~..'.,..55 TAX oOOKo,rI~,,r. ~.55 JRNI_-CD 232.$5 ' 301,00 A/P-OEC BOARD 30t,O0 CNL-CD ~1.(~ 25.00 E~ DUES IAF'MO ~.00 ~&-CD 45.00 PL~LICATIDNS 45,00 45.00 !7.~0 S~!NAR-CLYNE 17,60 JR~t-CD 17.60 93.78 PARTS 93.?$ J~&-CD 93. ~.:$ Ot-42E;O-2200 73-73C0-2200 78-7500-22C3 !010 10!0 01-4140-4110 01-4140-41!0 !010 01-4060-~10 1010 01-4070-~Q 1010" ot-2o~>Oooo !010 0!-41~0-41:~ 1010 01-4190-4!70 I010 7!-71C~9-4110 1010 !OlO :-'H 5 L275} LOG!S ~.t ~AYE~ CLUB L2920 TOTAL ~ / '.; ? / w .. V:;'~,ui< TOTAL ,0?/o9 2/09/89 LONG L~(E FORD ~ACTCR L.~-' 1 L~ KOH~'XEN L2740 2/09/89 ~m~Jo,~ ~ND~ TOTAL 2/~/89 2/O9,/89 VD~OR TOT~ 2)09/,9 2/o97 9 VII DISTR!21FFOR M3.-,040 M~TI~-M~I~!STE~ M3080 V~D'OR TOT~ 2/09/:~9 2109/89 V~R TOTAL TOTAL 3:.% 57 166195 ~AINSAW 166.95 ! 66.95 ~5.00 JAN INSFECTIC~ 3~,00 ~-CD -J,VY 1,5~,00 ~ ~MD~AL . 1,540;00 JR)L-CD I~0.00 6,092.65 ~AN BE~ .. 6,0~.65 JiNL-CD 6092. ,55 I~.00 ~ MAINT 135,00 JRNL-CD i~.00 150,~ JAN ~T 150.00 J~IL-CD 150.00 112.00 JN ENOR-CD 15 71,00 JAN E~R-SH~.ELINE PROTEC 82.00 JAN ENGR-PW 28,00 dAN D~R-NOR'~OD 56.00 JAN B~]R-~ISTA SEi~ 2.'9.7,00 dAN D~R-C!TY HALL ADDTN C15,00 jAN ENGR- 112,00 JAN ENGR-.ST~EET,. DEPT ~2,20 dAN ENGR-~SA & LEVIES 28.00 JAN B~]R-LAFAY~TE LN i!2,00 din ~J~-AF:B~R LANE 7;5-'-20zf)-r' :: CO Ol-20iO-OO:?O 71 - .'..0':. 0-,.)$C<} 0!-4020-41 !0 !'? i0 · 01-4280-2~00 I010 0t-4190-3!(~9 1010 01-43~-5110 !010 71-7100-95-~) I010 01-~95-~(x) 1010 0t-4140-3100 10!0 66-6000-3t00 ,D /,. ' · C~'J~)'.,j'~'~'d''J 01-4!90-3100 01-~i70-3100 0!-¢!~3:3!~ 25-~00-31C~0 01 - 2S00-05 ~5 !010 2107/87 "'" M3250 M ! NNEG45'CO M~7I MZ-~ CELLULAR TEI.~_r'H~NE ~ 2/07/87 2/~/~ v DE"~ TOTAL · 'i CONWAY FiRE & SALTY VDi~,OR TOTAL 2/(~?/89 2/09t87 ~1 D~T CF PUbLiC SA~Y ~¢~R TOTAL ~'-380 2/09/89 2/0~/~ ~N ~E~ATZD; & PARX V~ TOTAL 2/0~/',~ 2/~/',?~ ~N V~EY ~TiNG LA~CFATO V~$~ TOTAL 2/(9/89 15i5,20 t O, 5c~ ....... . ~,~.F~L- b ~ 10.50 45.80 FEB P&SER RENT 45,80 dRXL-CD .j, ,:4J 31,567.05 .FEB SEN~ SERVICE =_Wc~ SERVICE 12,294',76- FEB ~'~ 615.84,' FEB ~ SBRViCE 18,658.23 JRNL-CD,, 4~.~9 JAN OAS ~75,?? JAN GAS 387,07 JAN I,!38.44 JR~-CD 1138;44 .. ~4,,o Cm,~.Lb~AR TB.E 24,23 dRNL-CD 44. !0 1£~"~ 10,00 ~CN~S 54.I0 CNL-CD 54.10 !50.00 A/P 4 QTR CGN~%CT 150,00 JR~t-CD 150,00 110.00 DUES-~?A 110.00 C~NL-CD 110.00 44.00 W~T~ ~STS ~,00 44,00 247,03 WIh~CN ~HAGES 247,03 ~NL-CD OI 7o-, ~ .;,-, I '.'.*'0 - 0000 78-3:-? 12-0000 I010 73-7300-3720 78-7800-$720 O~-~',cn..:,~ 1010 Vl-414.-.~:~u 1010 ~-4170-2270 ~-4110-~0 10!0 01-~40-0000 i010 01-4~.0-4i.:,0 !0!0 I010 · , ::',.,~r. TOTAL 2/C;'/87 2/'C:<?/8'? ~CJ];iD FIRE DEPAF.~ENT UE:iDOR TOTAL M35C~) 2/09/~ 2!Cc.~I89 MOEND tIRE RD_iEF ASSN VENDOR TOTAL N..?~.,~ 2/~/89 2/09/~ NATL RECREATION & PARK ASS 'v~T.~]R TOTAL N3710 NAVARRE ' ~"""""' N3740 N3770 2/09/89 2/09/89 V~P. JSR TOTAL 2/09/.99 2/O9/..89 ?E'.~OR TOTAL 2/091F_¢ 2109/89 N~TH ST~: ~ =.x?~..,r,.,..= VDil2OR TOTAL 52. ':9 2, ..-.'60.75 1 .AF~O .; ! g, ..:b 4, ..--..40.25 4,871.83 4,871 ¢371 .~ 150,00 !50,~} 150,00 3,80 10.~ 218.85 8.9'8 7.58 7.58 51,08 ~,68 185.07 552..55 5.52.55 160,00 160,04 60.00 13,41 i3.41 13,41 ~!,87 206. l 1 ~,4.84 3t0, ~.7 197.4.8 2,872.19 ,,:.44.,&5 5,767.3! LETTEF,:S JAN MA!NT JAN DRILLS J~NL-CD FiRE RD JRNL-CD ' gU..-~-NnPA ~-CD ~N H~E JAN HDWE JAN HDWE JAN ~WE'MOTOR JAN HIAE-GLOVES ,JAN HDWE-. A/P-DEC HDWE A/P-DEC HD~E A/P-DEC HDWE JRNL-CD SIGNS ~NL-CD SEALS ~E-CD J~N ELECTRICITY JAN ~uECTRICiTY JAN D. ECTRICiTY jAN ELECTRICITY JAN ELE6~iCITY j~N ELECTRICITY dAN =i.~6TRICITY jR~-CD ? '5; - 7 C '] f'i - C:-'.:~'-f) 22-4~.70-31~.;'0 22-'~ t, 70- l 3'.:, } 1010 lOtO 01-4340-41:30 10!0 01-4230-230'0 ..-~ .,-, / o~ / oO0'izv~. 78-78~-22CX) 78-TLDX)O-23C'O 78-7800-~ 0! -4280-2200 0!-2040-0000 73-2040-~00 78-2040-0000 1010 0t-4~80-~ 1010 73-7300-2%0 1010 01-:280-3710 01-4~40-.gl. 01-4320~3710 71-71()0-37!0 ~-1170-:3710 7~ ~P^ O'fO JV'OI ~:~ 78-78%-3710 !0~0 · :) ~'T · . r4::'.", 02 '?76.79 0oo.'9 '~'?~.,00 ....... ! ,E:55,00 A/F-LASc~ 2 ,'C-9/::]9 2/r;';v:?= "~, ..,o=' ' ,00~ ~7;~,IL-CD n~9 90 C~'~hl , ~ ~ ~' ~'~ '~/(~/8° 2/09/',?~ ~ ~n .... c.~= .....dRNL-OD P~F'~: C~LNENSON ~ CO V~?-~:R TOTAL $49.98 P~OO ~8.60 J~N F~SI-~LA ~MPANY V~R TOT~ 25:8,60 P~A DiSTR!8~iNG CO V~ TOTAL ~827.(~ R42~ 54. O0 ' dAN ~/0~/89 2/09/8? ~.00 ~NL-CD R~DY'S S~,glTAT~J V~R TOTAL 54.00 R4280 ~NAL~ ~J3t(E RD~'$ iCE R4310 ~YAL F~RO'~I BE';~AGE ',/n"/"~ 2/09/89 £t vT! 0,, ~BCi3OR TOTAL ':'lO~/C~,, ,, ~, TOTAL '2/09/89 2/~?IS9 VB~,OR TOTAL VDiDOR TOTAL 200,00 JAN ASST ~Hi~ SALARY 200,00 '" r 200.00 57.00 dC.q iCE ~.00 ~.02 JAN ~,02 &~,i-C~ 46,02 !2,50 BAL DUE-VAC~.' 12.50 BAL !2,50 BAL GLE-VA~dJI~ !2,50 50,00 JDt_-CD 01-4280-2310 1010 71-7!00-9540 1010 71-7100-5~30 .lOiO 01-4~-37.50 1010 ,-,-41~0-I~70 1010 7, 7100-..~ 10!0 1010 73-7300-'Z30) 01-4280-~¢0 01-~?0-2300 lOlO -' "" ';T '1 · .) ·) ,i) .) S4370 S4:30 S~S PRINTING S4437 SPECIALTY S~EEN ING S4438 SPORT¥'S SHOF~J TOTAL 2/09/L:S 2/09189 ~..',~.~; TOTAL ~p.,,,,o.. 2/09/89 VDIDOR TOTAL 2/09/89 2109/89 VEI.~D~ TOTAL 2109189. 2109/89 9t~,IDOR TOTAL 2/09/~ 2/~/89 SPRIN~ P~K CAR WASH VE)~QR TOTAL ~0 2/09/89 2/09189 ~I'~£!NG ~C~IC CO '~R TOTAL 2/09/~ 2/09/8~ VSIDOR TOTAL 2/09/8? 2/09/89 ~DDOR TO ~L TOTAL ~ ,,.,~, I::.: RES¥CLE CO~.iTA!HE~:S !,029, ;:~: ,:,~!'~L-C[ 167,70 45~,75 R~CYCLE FLY.S 33.99 OPEN HD~E FLYEFS 48~;74 dRNL-CD 489,74 88.00 TRUCK E~L~S · .~.00 TF, tj~ E~LEMS 125,00 d~NL-CD 125,00 4~8.75 498,75 498,75 17.50 3.50 115.50 1~.50 136.50 107.84 107,~ I07,84 1,430.00 1,430,¢~ ~ .o0. O0 263.04 27,I6 .... .20 £,.£,~V ~A~H~ STATION J~L-CO JAN CAB WASH ~ CA~ ~H JNL-CD LI ,GHT BULBS JR.-CD FLAS~IGHT JAN ,~CYCLE .,~_.RVICE JR)L-CD DISPLAY-OPE)~ HOUSE ~-PARK CO,~ JRDL-CD ,...'~: - :270 - 2200 !0 !0 01-4040-!510 1010 01-4270-2120 01-4020-2200 1010 0,-4.5~-...00 73'7300-2:200 10!0 ~-4170-~9 I010 0I-4~0-3810 01-4I~0-~10 01-4140-~I0 1010 01-4.34~3-2~ 1010 73-7300-~00 1010 01-4270-42~0 1010 0!-402023510 01-4020-:~!0 10!0 .I -) '/ .) .) ..) ) T-I.7?O 7,744,2~ ,.,'A~I .REEF: 2'37/S? 2/0?/8? 7,74-1.:5 2/??/89 2/09/89 ~5,76 JR~4L-CD ~4RiFTY SNY[:ER ::RU~ HC4 VE?4DCR TOTAL 15.76 T4::;?O T~LS b?~LIMITED T4950 TRUCK T4980 2,")~/87 2/0?/8? VD'~D OR TOTAL T~IN CITY ~E J]ICE ~ VENDOR TOTAL US}~O 2/09/89 2/O9/89 ~i~'EI) BJSINESS M~I~S V~R TOTAL USt~ 2/09189 2/09/87 b,~tITOG RD~F~ S¥S',-'~ V~NDOR TOTAL 2/0W89 2/09/89, VA~4D~D4-HAZAED-STAL]_I~SS VE)IDOR TOTAL FOODS · 2/,r.;'~./8¢ 2/09/89 VENDOR TOTAl. 112.00 112. C'O ti2.oo 66,76 66,76 66.76 51.84 · 51.84 51.84 23.34 23.34 50,~ 83.30 126.80 ~.36 40,60 42.89. 63.40 432.67 432.67 420.00 360,00 780.00 780,00 62.64 162.I2 17.34 15.65 257.75 JR,~L-CD BOOM ~-q ,.,~,n-. JA~I MIX LIFT OFF TAPE JRNL-CD JAN TOWELS ,JAN RUGS JN UNIFDRMS JAN UN!FO~qS JAN UNIFDR~ ~ UNIFD&MS JAN UNIFORMS ~hl.-CD A/P ~C COMPR PLAN A/P DEC ~ C~'~Sbl. T ,.R'~t.-CD COt.FNC I L SUPPLIES SUPPLIES-~'EN HOb.WE Si]O( SALT STATI~ SUPPLIES d~ht-CD /~ /I.Yv 7,..... !010 ~-4170-220,) 1010 71-7100-95~ !0!0 73-73130-2i ® 1010.. · 01-4270-~50 73-7300-~X) 01- 42'80- .~.4.'} 01-4270-% .40 01-4340-2240 73-7300-.,~, 40 78-7800-2240 1010 16-2040-0000 01-2040-00CQ I010 01-4,0~-,'~. O0 01-4020-~',~ 01-4~%80-2340 -. ,-4170-,',J0 1010 ~Eo; O:,;.A SAH!TATiO,N WIDMER iNC WILLIAM W5'-,70 WILLIAiIS STYE I~ W5700 TOTAL 2/(~/87 2/0'?/:-3'? VD;[~ TOTAL 2/O'?/D? " ..... ..- / t.~ ?/,:,? VD-~OR TOTAL 2/09/$9 ~, :0'~ V~.,R TOTAL 2/~/89 2/09/89 ](5750 XB:E)X CORP1]PuqTION Z6051 IIqVID BOYD 2109189 2/09/89 V~DDR TOTAL 2/0'7/89 2/09/~ Vb'NI)DR TOTAL TOTAL AU. VE'ND]R~3 A?CLi;~T 40,00 40,00 ~0, O0 t0;506.00 1,067,00 1!,573.00 11~3.00 341,84 341.8¢ 70,00 70. O0 70.(~) 1,~0.00 1,964,00 3,540.50 85,50 425J00 1~,00 7,740.00 7740.00 158,45 49,24 12.02 %53 -~-7,24 56.00 ~,00 I00,916.31 M~,~ HAZELWCOD ~,~,~.'CD A/P'MATER!~S-RM AT IP J,~'~_-CD REF!_A~OAM~qCr[I) SHIRTS-DWALD ,~NL-CD FEB ~AIN~ A/P-TIF EXP-4 Qil~ A/P LECAL-4 QTR- A/P LEGAL'4 A~. LEGAL-4 Q~-PW A/P LEGAL-4 QTR-WESTEDGE ' ~,t~.-CD FEI) ~I~-5600 F1EB ~I~-1012 FEB INl'-.~:~)O FEI) INT-IO12 ~NL-CD ADVAJqDE-TRAINI)~-BOYD 8!-4350-53~0 73-7300-3800 10!0 0t-2040-00C~ -~} 1010 01-4110-3100' 64-2040-0000 01-2040-0000 26-2040-0000 ~,20~-00~0 60-2040-000') 1010 .. 01-4..~-5000 01-4~0-50~ '0f-4320-6110 01-431X)-6110 I010 22-4170-41!0 I010 JANUARY MONTHLY REPORT PARK DEPARTMENT General Comments: Again the winter weather is playing tricks, we have set record highs and lows for temperatures, and we~are still running behind in the average snow fall. This weather has made it hard to main- tain skating rinks. We did not get enough snow until the day after Christmas to build berms for retention of water. Then, with the berms built and a good ice base down, we had record high temperatures. Currently, we are building the rinks up again, but the very cold weather freezes hoses so it limits the number of flooding for the day. We do'not flood after noon because the ice would not have time to set before the rinks may be used. if they are used before they have frozen,.we face the problem of ice chunks. The weather has cooperated for the shoreline repair work that was performed. The riprapping projects on the island and Three Points are done, and the dredge off of Ashland is also complete. The Iow water level of Lake Minnetonka is providing a good oppor- tunity to do these improvements. Tree Removal: We had $1,500 worth of tree removals done on a small island off of Ridgewood this month. This island is City property and had a number of trees that had already fallen or had been damaged by beaver. We may want to look at riprapping this island, due to the erosion that is caused by water, when the level of the lake returns. Parks: ! have made contact with Minneapolis Tree for helping install the park equipment this summer. They said they would like to help again in 1989. The park equipment will be delivered the first part oF April and construction will begin shortly thereafter. Docks: The new computer system is installed. We are currently program- ming the computer and inputting t989 dock statistics. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 February 8, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR .JANUARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1988 LIQUOR STORE PROFITS The Mound Liquor Store shows'a preliminary net 'income of $55,600 for 1988. This is an increase of approximately $11,350 over 1987. The 1988 budget had a net income projected at $35,600. Jo. el Krumm shoul.d be complimented for the management of the liquor store to achieve these pr. of its.. We are' funding all of the costs of the sealcoat project in 1989 ($50,000 budget) from the liquor profits. INVESTMENTS " The following is January investment activity: Balance January 1, 1989' $9,180,676 Bcught: CP 9.14 Due 4-03-89 Marquette 293,459 Trs. Rec. 9.35 Due 2-01-91 Dain Bosworth 460,200 Matured: CP 7.96 Marquette (500,556) CD 8.05 Dain (100,000) CP 8.27 Marquette (130,277) 31 , 1989 Balance January $9,203,502 JN:ls An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race. color, national origin, or handicapped status in trte admission or access to. or treatment, or employment m, ~ts programs and activities. MOUND POLIC~ DEPARTMENT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Len Harrell Monthly Report for January, 1989 II. STATISTICS The police department responded to 697 calls for serv- ice during the month of January. There were 12 part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 3 burglaries, 7 larcenies, and 2 vehicle thefts. There wore 29 Part II offenses reported. Those of- fenses included 1 forgery/NSF check, 7 criminal damage to property, 1 narcotic violation, 1 liquor violation, 1 DWI, 4 simple assaults, 2 domestic assaults, 4 harassment, 2 runaway/truancy, and 6 other offenses. The patrol division issued 69 adult citations and 3 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 64 citations. .Warning tickets were issued fOr 66 situations during the month. One adult was arrested for a felony in January and 7 juveniles for felonies. There were 12 warrant arrests in January. The department assisted in 19 vehiclular accidents, 4 with personal injuries. There were 29 medical emer- gencies and 63 animal complaints. Officers' assisted surrounding agencies on mutual aid calls 14 times in January. Property valued at $10,429 was stolen during the month. The department recovered $3,863. INVESTIGATION The investigators worked on several different cases during the month of January. Those cases included three child protection, one criminal sexual conduct, one arson, five thefts, two burglaries, one assault, two truancy, one runaway, damage to property and harassing communications. POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JANUARY, 1989 III. IV. Ve Inv. Grand is averaging 20.5 hours per week in present- ing the D.A.R.E. program in both Shirley Hills and Grandview Middle School. The feedback from both schools has been very positive. Formal complaints were issued in ten cases. Those com- plaints included gross misdemeanor worthless check, ag- gravated DWI, gross misdemeanor DWI, assault, driving after revocation, theft, minor consumption,, and worth- less checks. MANPOWER The department used approximately 45 hours of over time in January. Additionally, there were several double- time holiday shifts worked. Officers earned approximately 40 hours of comp-time and used approximately 70 hours of comp-time. Officers used 74 hours of sick time, over 100 hours of holiday time, and over 70 hours of vacation. TRAINING Officers attended nine.days' of training and are cur- rently partaking in a "roll-call" video presentation on constitutional law. The other training included intoxilyzer recertifica- tion, field sobriety testing, juvenile justice, leader- ship and influence, and hazardous materials. RESERVES The police reserves donated 134.5 hours of volunteer time to the department and community. Their functions included working hockey games, the Pinewood Derby, reserve squad, and a transport detail. The unit lost one member in January. moved out of the area to Fridley. The individual The reserves are actively seeking additional members. 2 PART I CRIMES Larceny AD~:T. JUV Homicide ~a! Sexual Conduct Robbery Assault ~urglary 3 7 2 1 Vehicle J.r $o~ TOTAL PART II CRLMES Child Abuse/Neglect Forgery/NSF Checks Criminal Damage to Prooertv Weaoons Narcotic Laws Liauor Laws 2 12 7 1 1 DkV--~ Sim]Y! e Assault Domestic Assault Domestics (No Assault) Harassment Runaway/incorrigibility/Truancy Public Peace Ail Other Offenses I 2 TOTAL ' t ' 29 P~T !II &' PART IV ' Prooertv Damage Accidents Personal Iniurv Accidents Fatal Accidents ~ed_cals 29 63 14 53O 655 Animal Comolaints TOTAL 2 ! Aid 1 1 1 1 2 2 General Investigations n'_'enn. Cry. Child Protection CHIPS 1 1 1 7 M0~'TH GENERAL ACTIVITY SL?I~_~RY POLICE/ClIME ACTIVe' R=~0RT January YEAR 1989 THIS TZIS YEAR LAST MOh~f~H TO DATZ TO DATE Hazardous Citations [ 28. 28 '58 Non-Hazardous Citations 43 43 56 Hazardous Warnings 4 4 20 Non-Hazardous Warnings 20 20. 116 Verbal Warnings 118 118 72 Parkin~ CitatiOns 64 64 71 OVER .10 0 0 2 Property Damage Accidents 15 15 17 Personal Injury Accidents ' ~ 4 '4 .. 1 Fatal Akcidents 0 0 0 Adult Felony Arrests 1 1 : 2 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 19 19 17 Adult Mis.demeanor Citations' 8 .- 8 4 Juvenile Felony Arrests 0 0 2 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 1 1 8 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 3 3 7 Part I Offenses' 12 12 18 Part I! Offenses 29 29 36 Medicals 29 29 20 'Animal Complaints 63 63 50 Other Public Contacts .' 530 530 301 TOTAL 992 992 884 Assists 33 33 38 Fo!!o~._Uos 31 31 - HCCP 1 i, _ !<utua] A!~ ~ecuested 1 ~ PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUNMARY Bikes Snowrnob i 1 es i TEM Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. JewelKy & Precious Metals Home FuFnishings Radio & Electronic Equipment STOLEN $ 3,763 887 410 2,300 RECOVERED $3,763 100 Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment . . Miscellaneous TOTAL 1,500 1,569 $10,429 $3,863 CITATIONS DWI More than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving DriVing After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired, or No Plates Illegal Passing Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the' Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Derelict Autos Seat Belt Miscellaneous Tags TOTAL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY, 1989 ADULT 1 0 1 2 3 19 0 0 29 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 64 0 1 2 5 2 133 JUV 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 WARNINGS No Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Miscellaneous TOTAL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JANUARYt 1989 ADULT 9 8 19 0 3 12 1 9 61 ~RRESTS Warrant Arrests 12 JUV 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 5 MOUND POLICE RESERVES MONTHLY HOURS JANUARY~ 1989 OFFICER R5 R6 Rll R13 R14 R16 RI? R19 R22 R23 DETAILS Emer. C/O 1.0 Res. Sq. 2.5 Comm. S. Hockey Training 9.0 Instruction Ride Al. Admin. 10.0 Meeting 2.0 TOTALS 15.5 12.0 30.0 2.0 53.0 3.5 2.0 5.5 4.5 2.5 2.0 9.0 7.5 13.5 2.0 23.0 4.5 12.0 2.0 18.5 2.0 2.0 3.5 2.5 2.0 8.0 TOTAL 5.5 2.5 3.5 32.5 22.5 0 42.0 10,0 16.0 134.5 ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH 8 Hockey Games 1 Transport 1 Pinewood Derby 1 Reserve Squad OFFICERS R6 Niccum Rll Romain R14 Svoboda R16 Hawks R17 Kohman R19 Nelson R22 FLeming R23 Vogel Prepared by Gary Lotton GL/sh OFFICER Butch Hawks Ruth Vogel Dan Niccum Steve Kohman Sherry Svoboda Dave Ne[son John Romain TOTALS Jeff Fleming in training. MOUND POLICE RESERVES SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS JANUARY~ 1989 DEPOSIT $ 19.50 13.00 6.50 19.50 6.50 13.00 32.50 $110.50 BALANCE S310 50 434 O0 277 50 39 O0 104 O0 83 50 78 O0 S1326.50 Prepared by Gary Lotton GL/sh RUN: 30-JAN-89 CFS03 PRIMARY ]SHES ONLY? ACTIVITY COORS: NO ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 01/01/89 THRU 01/25/89 PAGE ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 09000 SPEEDING 3 4 4 09001 J-SPEEDING 1 1 09012 OPEN BOTTLE 1 2 09014 STOP SIGN 1 09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 1 1 1 09020 CARELESS/RECKLESS 09040 NO SEATBELT 1 3 09041 J-NO SEATBELT 1 09100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 2 2 3 09140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS 10 3 11 6 09200 DAS/DAR/DAC '1 1 09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED 5 3 8 11 09240 CHANGE OF DOMICILE 1 1 09301 LOST PERSONS 09312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 2 5 2 09313 FOUND PROPERTY 2 1 1 09420 DERELICT AUTO 2 09430 PERSONAL INdURY ACCIOENTS · 09450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS 2 1 1 4 09451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. 1 1 09465 SNOt4MOBILE ACCIDENTS 1 09561 DOG BITE 1 09563 DOG AT LARGE 1 1 6 2 3 24 19 2 3 1 3 1 5 1 10 54' 2 29 2 1 10 5 2 3 13 2 1 1 2 RUN: 30-JAN-89 CFS03 ]SN'$ ONLY? :VITY COOES: NO ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- M~ND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 01/01/89 THRU 01/25/89 PAGE ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 09566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 09730 MEDICALS 09731 DETOX-MEDICALS 09732 CRISIS INT.-MEDICALS 09800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED 09801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT 09900 ALL HCCP CASES 09910 MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS 099'~HANDGUN APPLICATION O998O O9992 09993 O9994 A5351 A5352 A5355 A5511 83494 83734 B4960 M4104 M5350 WARRANTS MUTUAL AID/8100' MUTUAL AID/6500 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS'CHLD-ACQ ASLT 5-THRT BOO ILY HARM-POS FRRM-ADLT-FAM BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 'RAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION LIQUOR - POSSESSING RUNAWAY 1 5 2 1 2 1 9 3 8 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 10 1 27 1 1 4 5 1 3 12 ? 5 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 RUN: 30-JAN-89 CFS03 PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? ACTIVITY COORS: NO ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 01/01/89 THRU 01/25/89 ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 M6501 N3060 N3070 N3080 N3190 03601 O3882 P3110 P3120 P3130 P3310 Tl159 T2029 T2061 T4021 T40~9 U3016 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION DISTURB PEACE-MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE DISTURB PEACE-MS-INTERFERE WITH PRIVACY DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS OBSENITY-MS-INDECENT EXPOSURE-TO MINOR OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MAIL-MONEY THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILOING-MONEY THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP THEFT-MS-BY CHECK-S250 LESS V1024 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNO~OBILE V2024 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-SNOt4NOBILE 2 1 1 PAGE TOTAL 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 5 1 1. 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 REPORT TOTALS: 42 27 65 67 65 5 5 7 1 284 RUN: 30-JAN-89 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OFF01 ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S COOES: ALL ACTIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 01/01/89 THRU 01/25/8g / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED A5351 1 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-MANOS-ADLT-FAM A5352 3 ASLT 5'INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ A5355 1 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ ASS11 1 ASLT 5-THRT BI)OILY HARM-POS FRRM-ADLT-FAM B3494 1 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT 1 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT 84960 1 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N*UNK WEAP-UNK ACT J2700 1 TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION M4104 1 LIQUOR - POSSESSING M5350 2 RUNAWAY M6501 1 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION N3060 1 DISTURB PEACE-MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY H3070 2 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 3 0 3 0 O' 3 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 o0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 50.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 PEACE-MS-INTERFERE WITH PRIVACY N3190 3 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3 RUN: 30-JAN-89 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OFF01 * * * * * * PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DISPOSITION COOES: ALL ACTIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 01/01/89 THRU 01/25/89 / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED 03601 1 0 OBSENITY'MS-INDECENT EXPOSURE-TO MINOR 03882 1 0 OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT P3110 5 1 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3120 1 0 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UN~ INTENT P3130 1 0 PROP DANAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT P3310 1 0 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT Tl159 1 0 THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEH[CLE-OTH* PROP T2029 $ 0 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP T2061 1 0 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MAIL-MONEY T4021 1 0 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY · T4059 1 0 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP U3016 1 0 THEFT-MS-BY CHECK-S250 LESS V102¢ 1 0 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNO~OBILE V2024 1 0 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-SNOgMOBILE 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 1 0 0 . 0 0 .0 4 2 0 0 2 2 50.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 1 '1 lO0.u 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 1 0 0 0 0 RUN: 30'JAN'89 INSTALLATION NAME "MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT OFF01 ' * * * * * * P ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R $ COOES: ALL ACTIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 01/01/89 THRU 01/25/89 ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PAGE 3 PENDING / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED REPORT TOTALS - 41 1 40 23 8 0 9 17 42.5 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO= FROMt DATE= SUBJECT= MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK February 6, 1989 JANUARY MONTHLY REPORT There were two regular council Meetings in January. The first was an organizational meeting, i.e. appointment of acting Mayor, acting City Manager, official-newspaper, designation ~of official depositories, etc. There was agenda preparation, minuteS, 17 resolutions and clean-up items from the two meetings. One new ordinance was adopted relating to the Park Advisory Commission. I put the Rapid File Program on my computer and have begun input- ting the cemetery records. This project will take a considerable amount of time to complete, but will make looking for people a lot faster. Linda and I continued to work on the voter registration from the November election. New quarter section maps were updated with zoning districts to make it easier for me when people call with questions. I attended a MCFOA (MN. Clerks' & Finance Officers' Association) Executive Board Meeting in Bloomington, MN., to finalize prepara- tions, i.e. educational programs for the March State Conference. I also attended a Region VI IIMC Meeting in LaCrosse, Wisconsin. I am continuing to work on city property card file to keep it current. fc equal ocportumt7 Emc~oyer that does not ~SCr "n~nate on the basis of race, coior, national origin, or ,handicapped status ~m t,~e acm~sslon or access ~o, or ~reatment or employment in, its programs and activities ~I~u5 D~.?M~:~ REPORT Moun~, Hinneao~& DRILLS & ~'~'-IA~"~'~'AZ~C~ . [. FIRE & FIR~ FIGHTERS ,DATE D~ DRI~ DRI~ ~N. T~ HO~Y .~. :1-/~ I'~3 WAG~ WAG~ ~0~ ~ WAO~ o. ~'cz / ~ ~ I~- 20 6.so I3o ,. '... .... ' / / ~ If'- ~o ..... ~~ I .~,~r G /~'~ THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR MONTH OF ,-4/J/~7 MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE NO. OF CALLS /' MOUND - FiRE EMERGENCY M'TONKA BEACH - FIRE EMERGENCY MINNETRISTA FIRE - EMERGENCY ORONO - FIRE ~ EMERGENCY SHOREWOOD - F~RE EMERGENCY EMERGENCY MUTUAL AID FIRE TOTAL FIRE ·CALLS TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS ~OMMERICAL RESiDENTiAL INDUSTRIAL ~'~ss & M~SCELLANEOUS ~UTO FALSE ALARM NO. OF HOURS - MOUND FIRE - MT~ BC. EMERGENCY TOTAL -M'TR~STA F~RE EMERGENCY - gRONO FIRE EMERGENCY · TOTAL - SHOREWOOD FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL EMERGE.CY -MUTUAL AID EMERGENCY TOTAL TOTAL OR ILL HOURS TOTAL EMERGEHCY HOURS TOTAL FIRE HOURS TOTAL FIRE & EHERGENCY HOURS HUTUAL AID RECEIVED MUTUAL AID GIVEN MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR J~~ MEN ON DUTY ~ J. Andersen ~ M. Nelson ~ G. Anderson 2 A. Opitz 0 J. Babb ~ G. Palm ~ J. Beauchamp ~//~ M. Palm ~ D. Boyd ~ G. Pederson / 0 D. Bryce 0 'T. Rasmussen ~ S. Bryce ~ M. Savage ~ D. Carlson ~ R. Stallman 2 J. Casey ~ T. Swensen ~ S. Collins ~ W. Swensen ~ M. David /O//~_ R. Williams ~ B. Erickson ~ T. Williams ~ S. Erickson ~ J. Garvais ~ K. Grady ' O' L. Heitz ~ C. Henderson O~ G. Johnson ~ B. Landsman R. Marschke /~ J. Nafus TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA Date: /~- ~ 2- ~ f DRILL REPORT Discipline and Team work Critique of Fires Pre-Plaining and Inspections Tools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films First Aid and Rescue Opera~ion Use of Self-Contained Masks Time Pumper Operation Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage O~erations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzle & Hose Alliance Inhalator Operation Time Note: Hourse Training Paid Q Excused ~ Unexcused O Present, Not paid ~l/j_ J. Andersen ~'/~. G. Anderson .~'/~. J. Babb ~/.~_ J. Beauchamp ~1/~_ D. Boyd ~.,/;_ D. Bryce. ~/.~L S. Bryce ~;/~ D. Carlson ,~'/~- J. Casey ~'/~. S. Collins ,~'/.3- M. David _.¥/&_. B. Erickson ~//~ S. Erickson %;~ J. Garvais ~1/~ K. Grady ,/~ C. Henderson G. Johnson ~ B. Landsman R. Marschke J. Nafus ~ M. Nelson ~'~ A. Opitz ~,/~ G. Palm ~/~ M. Palm ~i/~-- G. Pederson ~;/3- T. Rasmussen ~,/~ M. Savage ~'/~ R. Stallman _ T. Swenson W. Swenson ~1/~ R. Williams ~ T. Williams Dri'l lma~er MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND~ MINNESOTA DRILL Discipline and Team work Critique of Fires Pre-Plaining and Inspections Tools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films First Aid and Rescue Operation Use Of Self-Contained Masks Time REPORT Pumper Operation Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzle & Hose ~Alliance Inhalator Operation Time Note: Hourse Training Paid G ExcUsed ~ Unexcused 0 Present, Not paid ~i J. Andersen ~--~ G. Anderson 0.--J Babb J Beauchamp ~ ~ D. Boyd ~ D. Bryce 2/~_ S. Bryce D. Carlson J. Casey S. Collins ~-~ M. David ~ B. Erickson 1~ A. Opitz G. Palm ~ M. Palm S. Erickson ~/~_ G. Pederson J. Garvais ~---7~. T. Rasmussen K. Grady ~. M. Savage C. Henderson R Stallman G. Johnson ~_~ T Swenson B. Landsman ~_ WSwenson R. Marschke ~-7~. R. Williams J. Nafus ~' T. Williams M. Nelson Dflii~ ~ter CITY of MOUND 534; L' MOUND, February 8, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT': Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. January's Activity Report in January we pumped 20,140,000 gallons of water. There were 3 watermaint breaks. January'started out pretty nice weather. This enables us to spend time training our new employee, Pat Cheney[ Pat started on January 3. Pat has been working with Bob learning our procedures in well maitnenance, meter repair, meter testing and meter reading. Pat read meters the last 2 weeks of the month. This took 6 days insted of the 10 days it use to take us. Bob has been busy with well maintenance and meter, outside reader repair in the field. Our open house was a great turn out. It was nice to have the people of Mound tour our new facility. There was alot of positive things said from the people. SEWER DEPARTMENT The Sewer Departmenn for January was pretty routine. Electrical and pump maintenance. No sewer back-up for January. We have been going over different pump specs, for our lift station up-grade program. CiTY of ,~:2; February 8, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Geno Hoff Street Supt. January's Activity Report We started the month taking down the Christmas decorations which took a little longer than. usual because of some equipment, break down, but we had everything put awaX by the 13th. The 7th we got 5" of snow with a strong wind, we started to plow at 2:00 a.m. the 8th fullcrew. Freezing rain the llth, sanded for 5 hours, cleaned and hauled, snow from sidewalks the llth'aRd 12th. Freezing rain again the 26th out sanding. We used up the salt sand that was in the bin (1075 ton) so we hauled 400 ton from the Island Park stockpile. This should last through February. We got delivery on 2 of our Capitol Outlay items in January. Elgin Sweeper $63,708.00 and a 1982 Fomd Cherrypicker $8,500. were very much needed. The 1989 Both units The last 2 weeks of the month were super, so far as the weather goes. We were out cleaning catchbasins and cutting brush in our spare time. We cook some time to get the Public Works Facility ship shape for the Open House the 29th. ! think tis was a big success. SIGN DEPARTMENT Tim and Gregg built 3 new sign racks with movable partitions for the many different sizes and kinds of signs we keep on hand. When we want a certain sign you can walk in~o the room and have it in a matter of a minute or so. Before it would take 5 to 10 minutes to locate the one you wanted~ they were all piled one on top of the other. Signs put up this monnh 6 Stop, 2 No Parking, 2 No Parking this side, 1 - 5'6" X 2' Mound City Offices, green and white. CEbIETERY The cemetery has been very quite again this month. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 t612) 472-1155 February 7, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER JANUARY 1989 MONTHLY REPORT Not a great deal to report on for the month of January. Things have quieted down considerably now that the holidays are over. One finds that he or she must adjust gears rather abruptly when the month of January arrives. We went from a hectic pace in December (doing over a $100,000 in sales) to a screeching halt in January. Sales were only $59,675. Oh, incidentally, as I predicted, for the first time in a great while, sales were down this month as compared to January of 1988 when our sales were $60,903. Perhaps we will make up for this deficit in February, perhaps. One thing that kept us from watching paint"dry last month 'was the year-end audited inventory and inventory extension. The physical counting of the inventory was taken over two days; Sunday, January 1st and Monday the 2nd. We closed the store Monday to do this. There would not have been much action on this day anyway. Sunday's inventory lasted four hours. We completed the backroom storage area, the beer cooler, and the mix and miscellaneous items. Monday was dedicated to everything en the sales floor. Everything went smoothly and accurately from what I could ascertain ' The inventory extension and the reconciliation of our perpetual inventory book was performed over the next three weeks and turned over to John Norman on January 23rd. I was satisfied with this time frame because it had to be done in conj.unction with our other job responsibilities. John was able to work up some "preliminary" results based upon this data. I am not sure whether John has included this "preliminary" report in your packet. All 1988 expenses were taken into consideration when compiling the findings except for one which has to do with re.conciling any differences in our share of our common area lease agreement k'ith our landlord, SILVER M&NAGEMENT. This last ex.zense statement is usually forwarded to John on or about the first of February. An equal opportumty Emctoyer that does '~ot discriminate on t~e basis of race, color, national orig~n, or hand~cappeq status ,n the adm,ssion or access to, or treatment or empioyment ;n, ~ts programs and activities LIQUOR STORE JANUARY 1989 REPORT February 7, 1989 Page 2 Even with this last settlement to be paid, you will get a fairly accurate account, as to the sales and especially the profit picture for the Mound Liquor Store in 1988. John may be reluctant to give you the results since it is not yet "official". What I can tell you is that the profits are far better than last year and that we greatly exceeded our goal of $40,000 which was to be transferred to the general fund for the se~.l coating project. JK:i$ ME MORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: February 3, 1989 City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staf~ Jan Bertrand, Building Official ¢ January 1989 Monthly Report STAFFING During the month of December, we had 20 working days, 2 holidays, and 2' days sick leave for myself. The Inspection/Planning Department had two Planning Commission meetings on January 9th, and January 23rd. Peggy James also attended one Park Commission meeting on January 12th. ! have attended two City Council meet- Ings on January lOth and 24th, and. a City Facilities Task Force meeting on January 19th. - INSPECTiO~ The following inspections were conducted during the month of December: Site Inspections 25 Footing Inspections 3 Framing Inspections 8 Insulation inspections 5 Drywall Inspections 8 Final Inspections 11 Progress Inspections 19 Erosion/Grading Inspections 0 House Moving/Demolition 2 Heating Inspections 5 Plumbing Inspections 5 Fire Sprinklers/Fire Code 5 Complaints ~ TOTAL lO0 This list of Inspections does not include 16 inspections con- Oucted by the substitute inspector during t'he month. January 1989 Monthly Report Planning & Inspections REPORTS AND PLAN REVIEWS There were 2 plan reviews completed during January. The monthly report For December and the Annual Report was submitted to the City Manager. Reports were also submitted to the. City Council regarding the property at 1657 Finch Lane and the Community Serv- ices Request For a temporary portable sign, as well as the normal correspondence, inspection notices, and reports to the Planning and Zoning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission meeting oF January 9th was a joint meet- ing with the City Council For vacancy interviews to the Planning Commission. There was Board oF Appeal action for Fence height variance. Planning Commissioner, Bill Thal, and Jerry Clap- saddle, the top ranked applicant, were appointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the January 241h City Council meeting. Mark Koegler, City Planner reviewed the Shoreland Management por- tion of the ComprehensiVe Plan - Land Use. StaFF was directed by the Planning Commission to bring back a possible Fence ordinance revision defining Fence height. LEGAL STATUS During Janua'ry, one citation was issued, one warning tag, and two Formal complaints were signed at the court services oFFice by the Inspection Department. A letter was sent to the City Prosecutor to report sta.tus oF 5110 Windsor Road and 1736 Baywood Shores Drive which are under court prosecution action. The City Council took action at their January 241h meeting to proceed with the condemnation oF the residence at 1567 Finch Lane. TRAININg/MEETINGS I attended the City Council and Planning Commission meetings during danuary. I attended the 33rd Annual Institute For Build- ing OFFicials at the Earl Brown Center, University oF Minnesota For three days. There were many topics which you could choose to attend. I m~inly attended the sessions dealing with the new Min- nesota Mechanical Code. I attended the City Facilities Task Force Meeting on January 19th, there was no quorum present; we met with the architect/engineer to discuss possible additions to City Hall. I attended the regular staFF meeting on January 17th. 2 January 1989 Monthly Report Planning & Inspections CITY EQUIPMENT & PURCHASES The City vehicl~ required the normal gasoline Fills, car wash, and parts were installed to replace the shift mechanism in the console. Books were purchased For the department as well as other miscellaneous supplies. A year-end review of revenues and escrow account were conducted with the Finance Department. STATISTICS OF ACTIVITIES The total number of building permits issued in the month of January was 20 with a total valuation of $257,172. The valuation figures are attached on the building activity report for danuary. In addition, Peggy has prepared the monthly calendar For February city meetings and events, arranged appointments For the inspec- tion of buildings, plumbing, and For the substitute inspect°r, prepared the Planning Commission agenda and minutes, completed the Park Commission agenda and minutes, typed correspondence and 1988 Annual Reports For the Building OFFicial and Park Director, and compiled month-end reports For building activities, Sewer Availability Charge, and U.S. Census. " Site inspections include the ~eview of the Planning Commis- sion requests and requirements, site inspections for Flood plain verification,, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance notices, review status of various sites For the city prosecutor, preconstruction meetings at the site for building permit applica- tions or realtors, Fire damage and periodic commercial inspection updates. ** The heating inspections during the construction of a project are included under the Framing and Final inspection of the build- ing. The heating installations mentioned are For separate equip- ment being placed in homes and businesses. NI~W RE$10ENTIAL CITY OF MOUND 534! Mayw~d Road I~ound, MN '55364 BUILDINO ACTIVITY REPORT ~ January '.~y ~989 TO(~I Non- Frailly ~ NO N, RIG$1OE NI'IA~ tIqE$1OENTIAL AOOITION~ ANO ALTERAT~)N8 Tol~ ~e~,dent~el ! TOTAJ. CITY of February 8, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator January's Recycling Well i'm glad to say that the investmeot in the containers has paid~ off real well. December's tonnage was 21.08 with 456 households participating. Now in January with the containers and twice a month pickup we totaled 52.42 tons with a total of 2,393 households participating. We have more than doubled our ~onnage and increased our households participating by ~ times. 'I am very pleased. Our total tonnage for just the curbside pickup for 1988 was 200.7 tons: I'm still waiting for tonnage figures from three church paper drives before I can come up with our total for 1988. Also included in our total figure is the waste oil and leaves from the compost site at Minnetrista. CITY of MOUND February 9, 1989 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: January's Activity Report This months shop work included : POLICE DEPARTMENT: 5 oil changes, 3 brake jobs: 4 battery replacements, 3 light problems~ 14 misc. repairs and 12 starting problems. 'PARK DEPARTMENT: 1 .entire exhaust syste~, 4 steering repair and alignment STREET DEPARTMENT: 4 battery replacements, 1 exhuast repair, 2 .service jobs and 7 misc. repairs BUILDING INSPECTOR: Replace worn out gear shifter. WATER DEPARTMENT: 1 flat tire, I service job and 1 brake job. CITY of MOUND February 10, 19@9 5341 MAYWOOD RCAD MOUND. MINNF'SOTA 55364 Mr. Dale Reimer 4639 Manchester Road Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Mr. Reimer: I am responding to your inquiry at the January 24, 1989, Council Meeting. You asked why it took 18 months for the City to send a shut off notice for your property. The City policy is to' send a shut off notice ~fter a bill has been delinquent for 6 months. Your wife was living at the property for the following billings: February. 1988 $ 76'93 May 1988 $ 106.80 You requested a. final bill for this property on June 18, 1988, about the time a turn off letter would have been sent on this property. You called in August to 'have us bill your wife again. At that time, I said we would do so, but I explained that the utility bill would become your responsibility if your wife 'did not pay the bill. Under State Law, the utility bill stays with the property. We do not make a practice of turning off properties that have been issued a final bill. If we had done so, your service would have been terminated in July. You would have lived there one month before service would have been terminated. We allowed time to collect the amount of the previous bill. We had not. received any payment on the previous balance on your bill by December. Your property received a turn off letter that stated your bill would be on the Council Agenda January 24, 1988, unless prior arrangements to pay the bill were made before the Council Meeting. On January 20, 1989, you came into City Hall and signed a con- tract on paying off the previous balance with your future bill- ing. The contract is valid and the first payment is February 15, 1989. if this agreement is not kept, water service will be ter- minated. ~" tr.e acm:s~.icr, cr ~,c.ce~s lo. or' treatrner=t or err~:Oy~,e'"'! '~ ~t$ r'ooram~ a"d act~%:t,es If you have a~y further questions, please contact me. Sincerely, John L. Norman Finance Director JLN:fc January 23, 1989 MOUND. ,MI*~NESOTA E~.2.~z ~ ~ 2~.~72-~3~ I HIA-xX CARLEVISION City of Mound ATTN: Mr. Ed J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle,Jr.: As you may remember, Triax purchased the Dowden properties in May, 1988 which resulted in operating under their separate existing budgets creating two regional offices. In 1989 we are combining the regional offices into one office in Waseca 'which was the established regional office for Triax at the time'of purchase. The. Waseca Regional Office location was determined for a variety of reasons, principally computer space requirements for a ~ew computer mainframe for combined billing and customer service. The Waseca office can easily · accomodate these needs without-additional building improvements or office relocation as would-be required in the Metro area, The Mound office will continue to be in operation as the Metro technical center and will continue to be the site of my office in my new role as Director of ?ublic Affairs for all Triax operations in the State of'Minnesota. Mr. Richard Hanson, the Regional Manager for the Waseca office will be the Reg~ona! Manager for'all of Minnesota Triax operations and will continue to office in Waseca. My duties as the Director of Public Affairs involve Governmental (city council/cable commission !iason, franchise agreements, etc.),.Pub!ic Access and various marketing matters. Technical and operational matters should be referred to Mr. Hanson at 507-835--5979 or 1-800-332-0245. I can be reached in my Mound Office or through Mr. Hanson after January 30th. These changes will streamline the functioning of the combined companies and will enable us to give better service to our customers. Sincerely, .,:=.y A. Smith Director of Public Affairs CC: Jim Vaughn Ric Hanson 100 F!LLMORE STRES' SUITE DENVER. COLORADO 50206~ 303/333-2424 TELECD~IER 303/333-1110 TFRI,a,X COMMUNICATIONS GOd.ORATION January 31, 1989 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. Gentlemen: Effective June 1, 1988, TrSax Midwest Associates, L.P. acquired the assets of Dowden Cable Partners, L.P. The enclosed payment of $15,148.22 is for services provided by Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. for the period ending December 31, 1988, in accordance with .our franchise agreement. The subscriber count is 1749 as of December 31, 1988. The franchise fee is based on revenues of $302,964.44 for subscriber services per our billing system. A detailed account of these records is maintained in our office -in Denver, Colorado and is available for your inspection. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Mound, and should you have any questions, please feel free to call'us. Yours very truly, Christopher R. O'Toole Corporate Controller CRO/km Enclosure ,l ...... ~d. PiinnemoLa F",E: E:ur'as:i. ar'i Mi ! ~:oi J. Weeds Ply hu.:-:~.Oa~;d and f are new to tl"ie City o.t: Hound. Ue no sooner' huna ~Ii the pictures on ~he wall in our Lake klinnetonka home and the news o~- the Eurasian t"li!~:oil WE,~d l::)rc, k:e into t:he !Z,L.~blic eve:,. and have set 'the ~gh2E, 1 ~. 1 n i~'iot 1 on ~(:~ F'eE]L~S~: ~ [:~erFD1 '~] to have our own lake .~rc:,nL kreat:ed, k!e s'Lrono!v ur'-O(~ the City' o+ Hound to approprlate arid soiand the:, $t0.,:}0C, ~or more,, 'to ~i(]ht the weed. "[Inank ,;ou Eor !istenin,a. ncere.L v,, ann and F<a.[ph Wiebusci3 CARLSON COMPANISS MEMO TO FROM SUBJECT DATE FORM 914-004 CA R LSO N COMPAN I ES BOARD MEMBERS JoEIlen L. Hurr. Chair Orono Thomas Reese, Vice Chair Mound Jan Boswinkel, Secretary Uinnetonka Beach Mark Westlund, Treasurer ' Wayzata Marvin Bjorlin Tonka Bay David Cochran Greenwood Albert O. Foster Deephaven James N. Grathwol Excelsior Ron Kraemer Spring Park John Lawman Uinnetrista John G. Ualinka Victoria Robert K. Pillsbury Uinnetonka Robert Rascop Shorewood Robert E. Slocum Woodland LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIC. 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHOHE 6121473-7033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR January 27, 1989 The Honorable Steve Smith Mayor, City of Mound 2710 Clare Lane Mound, .MN 55364 Dear Mayor Smith: The infestation of Eurasian water milfoil in Lake Minnetonka has attracted widespread concern. The Task Force organized by Tom Reese, Mound, on behalf of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, supports an immediate weed harvesting plan starting this summer. While Eurasian water milfoil cannot be eradicated, we definitely cannot afford to wait out this summer while the weed advances. Private funding is now being solicited to achieve an equipment and operating budget described in the enclosed outline. We are confident individuals will be joined by.regional resources from the county, po_ssibly the state, and for 1990'the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. LMCD Chair JoEllen Hurr joins with your Board representative, Tom Reese,.in askimg your city to make a mignificant investment in this year's equipment and operating needs. We realize budgets have already been set. We also expect that emergency conditions can find a way to be met given the care and concern of ifs officials. May we ask your favorable and prompt consideration of a dollar commitment in February equal to your annual LMCD levy? That amount, and comparison with the other Lake Minnetonka cities, is on the attached summary. Your LMCD representative and a Task Force member will be present to answer questions as yo~onsider this request. Thank you for allowing this on the full schedule of priorities your city handles so well. Yours with pride in Lake Minnetonka, ~or Lake Minnetonka Conservation District enc: levy chart, milfoil map~- c: Ed Shukle, City Manager~'~ Tom Reese LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ADVISORY COP~[ITTEE ~IINUTE$ 7:00 pm, Wed., Jan. 18, 1989 TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL Attendance: LMCD Directors Tom Reese, Chair, Mound; Bob Pillsbury, Minnetonka, Jim Grathwol, Excelsior; Bob Rascop, Shorewood; Jan Boswinkel, Minneton~a Beach; Dave Cochran, Greenwood; Jack Mauritz, Metro- politan Council; Tim Marr, Hennepin Parks; Nels Nelson, Barr Engineering; Neal Weber, Mound; Frank Mixa, LMCD Assistant; Dave Arndorfer, Consultant; Gene Strommen, Executive Director PROJECT SCHEDULE REVIEW. Arndorfer summarized the progress to date from the Project Schedule through mid-January. Activities were noted in the areas of Recreational Use Monitoring, Natural EnvirQnment, Public Safety, Shoreland Manage- ment, Institutional, Lake Access and Plan Development. An outline was provided each participant. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS. Shoreland Management/Protection -- Arndorfer reported a true dialogue is taking place among the 14 communities which have been in attendance each of the first two meetings. Staff specialists, professional consultants and. elected officials are in representation. While the group does not speak for their city councils, they are the link to developing consensus on the study. Final drafts will be presented to the city councils for their review and adoption. The intent is to develop_shoreland regulations acceptable to all 14 cities, taking note of the differences among the cities and making p.rovi- sions for those differences where appropriate. The end result is to have a compreheisive set of shoreland ordinances which will encompass the needs of the 14 communities and be equal to if not more stringent than the DNR where- ever practical. Excelsior, ~Mound and Spring Park were noted to have minimum lot sizes less than the DNR minimum requirement. This will require resolution to avoid creating non-conforming uses. Some undeveloped lots are at 6,000 ft2. Looking for language to encourage communities to combine smaller lots will take some negotiating, Arndorfer added. Variances must also be addressed. Building heights will also create or prompt some noteable disagreements as to the desired outcome, taking into account the differences of cities such as Minnetonka compared to residential communities such as Woodland or Greenwood. be * The next Shoreland sub-committee meeting is 8:00 am, Thurs., Feb. 9, Wayzata City Council Chambers. Fisheries -- Nelson noted the first meeting of Dec. 16 was lightly attended due to snow conditions'that day. Available data shows the fishery in Lake Minnetonka to be in good shape, no trends markedly indicate any changes. The data on fish habitat is not adequate to draw any conclusions. Control of Eurasian water milfoil by harvesting or chemical treatment has not' been studied to demonstrate what effect it may have on fish habitat. Lake Minne- tonka~s EWM weed harvesting program can serve as a case study for habitat assessment. It was suggested by the committee that a sampling of EI~ harvest- ~ng ~e'~one using a variety of cutting percentages, such as 10%, 30%, 90%. ~? LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ADVISORY CObDEIT'TEE, Minutes, 1/18/89, P. 2 Fisheries (continued) -- Cutting fishing lanes for the "casual" fishing participant was suggested, marking the lanes and educating people on how to fish in the lanes. This will require a strong media/print campaign. Bass Tournament effect on the fishery merits examination. Use of radio telemetry to track fish movement was suggested. Fishery data on Lake Minnetonka specifically is very incomplete upon searching DNR records. Enlisting the cooperation of securing data from bass tournament sponsors was suggested. Howard Tripp and other sponsors should be contacted. Public Safety -- The first meeting is set for 8:00 am,.Thurs., Feb. 16 at the new South Shore Police Dept., Highway 7 just east of the McDonalds at Minnetonka Blvd. intersection (Division Street). Participants in this subcommittee will include Henn. Co,nty Water Patrol, all lake city law enforcement agencies, which include Minnetonka, Orono, Deeph~aven, Wayzata, Mound, South Shore among others. Carver.County Sheriff, Hennepin Parks Ranger Chief, (474-3261), LMCD's prosecuting attorney Steve Tallen and if possible the head judge of Hennepin County. MANAGEMENT PLAN PUBLIC MEETINGS. The five public meetings are confirmed as: Jan 19, 7:30 pm Mound-Westonka High School " 26, " Wayzata Senior High School Feb 2 " St Louis Park City Council Chambers " 9 " Minnetonka Community Room " 16 " Edina City Council Chambers A paid ad for the five meeCings published~in 'six SAILOR newspaper editions, and the news release was circulated for committee information. Members were invited. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SYSTEMS COMMITTEE QUARTERL~ PRESENTATION. The second quarterly report is'set for'll:O0 am, Tuesday, Feb: 21, at the Metro Council Board Room, St. Paul. Chair Hurr will accompany Advisory Committee representa- tives, along with Arndorfer and Strommen. WINTER MONITORING'PROGRAM. The revised Experimental Design was presented incor- porating earlier committee recommendations. Pre-test results of the first week of January were in and the survey is now underway, Arndorfer reported. Reese asked if it would not have helped to ask about fish catches. Arndorfer noted this has not been a part of such surveys, including the summer survey, and was not understood to be a Part of this edition. Some 1,400 responses are targeted from the survey mailing now underway. CONFERENCE BUDGET REALLOCATION. Arndorfer propose~ in response to cash flow concerns for the workshop on setting access and density standards for the lake~ that he delay the costs by a quarter by visiting the conferees at their area locations instead, of having them come to this area. The information from this workshop is to provide guidance for the 198'9 summer monitoring program and the setting of standards for the lake. Mauritz was concerned that the synergism of the group gathering would be lost by individual interviews. It also leaves the Advisory Committee and other prospecti attendees out of the exchange. The need for the specialists is to get their sound philosophical base on access and management standards which Arndorfer indicated is only available from the few remaining individuals he intended to include in the workshop. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ADVISORY COM}[ITTEE', Minutes, 1/18/89, P. 3 CONFERENCE (continued). The Advisory Committee concluded the need is apparent that the workshop be held. Arndorfer could make some preliminary contacts dbring the interim with the conferees as their early advise would be necessary prior to the summer monitoring program. Six conferees were planned. A June or July date, including a seminar in conjunction with the workshop taking advantage of the conferee's expertise for select individuals/groups could be an added value. This could have a fee built into it to assist on some costs. State- wide lake management district representation, possibly lake legislators, and agency specialists should be considered for possible participation. Arndorfer was asked to develop and explore with the conferees the.June/July work- shop and present a proposed outline at the February 8 Advisory Committee meeting. (TRAILER/BOATS magazine was suggested to have valuable data on lake access.) FACILITY INVENTORY REVIEW. The maps showing lak& facilities was discussed, with misidentification as to locations noted in several instances. Arndorfer will conduct a further evaluation with Barr Engineering to bring the facilities into proper order. WEED TREAT}aNT PERMITTING AUTHORITY. Arndorfer called the committee's attention to LMCD's state statute, Section 3.'(g) which states the district has powers'"To regulate the construction and use of mechanical and chemical means of de-icing the lake, AND to regulate the mechanical and chemical means of removal of weeds and algae from the lake;" It was suggested that LMCD's initiative with the Eurasian water milfoil might be served well by joining with the MN DNR in the weed treatment permitting process being conducted on Lake Minnetonka. Strommen will gather background on the permit process and regulations the MN DNR presently uses. FEBRUARY MEETING. Reports on the Fisheries Management Plan, progress on the Winter Survey will be among the meeting priorities, along with the workshop preliminary plan for June/July. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 pm. For the committee, Executive Director Tom Reese Chairperson LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE February 1989 Thursday Wednesday Thursday Saturday Monday. Thursday Wednesday 2- 2-89 2- 8-89 2- 9-89 2-11-89 2-13-89 2-16-89 2-22-89 Advisory Committee - Public Meeting on Management Plan Study 7:30 p.m., St. Louis Park Council Chambers 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park Advisory Committee 7:00 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall Advisory Committee Subcommittee on Shoreland Protection 8:00 a.m., Wayzata City Hall Advisory Committee - Public Meeting on Management Plan Study 7:30 p.m., City of Minnetonka Community Room 14600 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m., LMCD Office, ~ayzata AdVisory Committee Subcommittee on Public Safety 8:00 a.m., location to be announced Advisory Committee - Public Meeting on Management Plan Study 7:30 p.m., City of Edina Council Chambers 4801 West 50th St., Edina Public Hearing: Rosenblum/Ulrich Variance application for dock length Public Hearing: St. Alban's Bay Marina Variance application for.dock use area 7:00 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall Regular Meeting, Board of Directors 7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall 1-31-89 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 EVENTS SCHEDULE February 1989 Saturday & Sunday 2- 4-89 & 2- 5-89 Wayzata Chamber of Commerce Chilly Open Sat: Golf 9 am to 5 pm Sun: Wayzata Fire Dept. fishing contest 1 pm to 4 pm, Wayzata Bay Saturday 2- 4-89 Westonka Chamber of Commerce ice fishing, noon to 4 pm, Spring Park Bay Friday 2-10-89 Rollin B. Child, Inc. ice fishing, 11:30 am to 3 pm, Excelsior Bay Sunday 2-12-89 Birchview Elementary P.T.O. ice fishing contest 1 pm to-3 pm, Wayzata Bay ~ for the WfNTER SEASON per schedule Broomball, Lord Fletchers of the Lake 1-31-89 .5'03 ADVISORY COMMITTEE A G E N D A Meeting, 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, February 18, 1989 Tonka Bay Village }{all 4901 Manitou Road, Tonka Bay 1. Project Schedule and Progress Report (Enclosure) Subcommittee Meetings Report a. Shoreland Management b. Fisheries c. Public Safety, o Upcoming Subcommittee Meeting Schedule a. Pubic Safety - February b. Wetlands March Membership c. Lake Use 'March Membership Other Upcoming Meetings a. Public Meetings February 9th 7:30 pm Minnetonka Community Room February 16th 7:30~pm Edina Council Chambers b. Metropolitan Council Systems Committee February 21st St. Paul Metropolitan Council Chambers 5.. Winter Use Monitoring - Task 225 & 226 (Handout) a. Survey Reshlts b. Observations 6. Conference Budget Reallocation Tasks 701 to 704 (Enclosure) 7. Facility Inventory Review - Task 105 8. Fisheries Plan Task 317 (Separate Mailing) Next Meeting - March 8th a. Shoreland Management b, Lake Use VOLUNTEE RSVOLUNTEE RSVOLU NTEE RSVOLUNTEERSVOLUNTEERS u~ You Are Invited To Join < s:: O ~ SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES z Z --4 ~ m O r,r- O ~--' Z Z "4 ~ m .._1 rtl O ::u r'r' O I--.- Z Z ~ m O r,r- O Z ;:~ .' m -J m O o~ A Senior Volunteer will Present a Representative< o ,,,r'r'From Your City With An Award r-' F.- Z Z .--4 ~ m - A Box Dinner will be served at 5 p.m. m O > Awards will be presented at 5:30 p.m. O ~- Please RSVP by March 9, 1989 z Z m ~ To Senior Community Services 933-9311 m O ::u VOLUNTEE RSVOLUNTEE RSVOLU NTEE RSVOLLINTEERSVOLUNTEE RS In Thanking the Senior Volunteers From Your Community at a VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION PARTY' Wednesday, March 15, 1989 4to 6 p,m. Eisenhower Community Center 1001 Highway 7, Hopkins '~""~~HAPiNG CHANGE: PREPARING THE TWIN CITIES FOR THE 21st CENTURY February 22, 1989 Hotel Sofitel 15601 W. 78th St. (at 1-494 and Hwy. 100) Bloomington, Minnesota The Metropolitan Council invites y .... SHAPING ,,~' - ',.~ .o PREPARING THE TWIN CIT! The Twin Cities Area faces immense changes and challenge.~in the decades to come-ma or . .,~ population shifts intensified economic competition, increased demand on resources tor ,Z ::~'~,~'~ public services and facilities, a growing burden of public and corporate debt and the effects ~ of technological advances, among others. How well the region meets these challenges depends largely on how well it positions itself to take advantage of long-range trends, antic- ipates problems that could prevent it from doing so and remains adaptable to unforeseen events. Because the future is shaped by what we do today, the task of preparing for the 21st century really begins now. Program 1 p.m. REGISTRATION 2 WELCOME: Steve Keefe, chair, Metropolitan Council 2-3 KEYNOTE ADDRESS: "Mastering Change," by Rosabeth Moss Kanter · Author of The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation and seven other books on organizational Change · Board chair and cofounder of the business consulting firm Goodmeasure, Inc. · Professor at the Harvard Business School 3-4 GENERAL SESSION ' 3-3:30 "Emerging Political Issues," by Robert M. McCord · Executive director, Congressional Qearinghouse on the Future, a bipar- tisan legislative-service organization that provides members of Congress with information about economic, technological and political trends 3:30-4 "Challenging Complacency: Change as an Ally," by Judith A. Pinke · Chair, Metropolitan Council's Metro Futures Task For. ce · Assistant commissioner, Minnesota Department of Administration · Former director, Metropolitan Council's Metro Systems Department 4-4:15 BREAK 4:15-5:30 CONCURRENT SESSIONS Session 1: Preparing Today for Tomorrow's Work Force ModeraTor: Earl 'Craig, Owner and principal, Earl Craig Co. .~:-... Participants: John Brandl, Minnesota state senator. District62 x.~...,~; Patricia A. McLagan, Chief executive. McLagan International. Inc. · Session 2: Twin Cities Air Travel: A Strategy for the Future ,,.;"~,~'~-~ Moderator: Curt Johnson. Executive director. Citizens League Josephine k'letrooolJ'.an Council member ...'z,¢~. z¢,~% Participants: Nunn, . ~..~/ ':'"~ Cochair, Airport Adeduacy Study Task Force ¢ Richard Braun, Director. Center lot Transportation Studies. %~'.x..ix University of Minnesota / Alton J. Gasper, Chair, Transportation Advisory Board L~,...~-~-: Benjamin Griggs, Vice presidem. Northwest Airlines 5:30-6:30 SOCIAL HOUR ' 6:30 DINNER 7-7:20 AWARDS PRESENTATION: Regional Citizen of the Year and Donald D. Carroll Public Service Awards 7:20-8 STATE OF THE REGION ADDRESS: "Keeping Options Open," by Steve Keefe )u to its State of the Region 1989 CHANGE: !S FOR THE 21st CENTURY Robert M. McCord . Judith A. Pinke Registration Form" To register, please send lhis form and a check payable to "State of the Region" for $30.00 by Feb. 15 to: Donna Mattson Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Phone: 291-5500 I plan to attend the State of the Region on Feb. 22,:1989. Name: Organization: ~,:~ Street Address: ~~: c,ty/st,te/zip: ?-" ~ Phone' I wish to attend the following concurrent session (check one): l'-'q., Preparing Today for Tomorrow's Work Force ~ T,vin Cities Air Travel: A Strategy for the Future The registration fee covers the ccst of the program, dinner and copies of reports distributed at the event. The fee is nonrefunaable. Advance reg]stratio2 is required [o attend the event. Theodore W. Fox, -Petitioner, FINDINGS OF FACT, o~~ CONCLUSIONS OF L'kW AND vs. ORDER FOR JUDGMENT County of ~ennepin, File No. TC-619I Respondent. Dated: August 26, 1988 The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Arthur C. Roemer, Judge of the Minnesota Tax Court, on May 3, 1988 at the Hennepin County Juveniie Justice Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Theodore W. Fox, the petitioner, appeared pro se. Mark Chapin, Assistant ~ennepin County Attorney, appeared for respondent. The sole issue was the January 2, 1986 estimated market values on three condominium units located in the Lakewinds Condominium Complex. Post-trial briefs were filed_ by both parties_ and t...~ case was submitted to the Court for decision on May 31, 1988. The Court, having hear~ and considered the evidence adduced at the hearing and upon all of the files and records herein, now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Petitionec has sufficient interest in the property to maintain this petition: all statutory and jurisdictional requirements have been CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The assessor's estimated market value for the subject property as of January 2, 1986/shall be reduced on the books and records of the City of Mound and C~unty of Hennepin as follows: Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-106 FROM Assessor's 9ri~inal E.M.V. $ 62,500. 82,700 TO Court Determined Market Value 47,0o0 79,300 48',000 ,, ~/~O~ 2. Real estate taxes due and payable in 1987 shall be recomputed accordingly and refunds, if any, paid to petitioner as r~quired by such computations, together with interest from the original da~ of' payment. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. ORDERED. A STAY OF I5 DAYS IS HEREBY .BY THE COURT, Ar~hur C. Roemer,l Judge Minnesota Tax Cour~_ DA..D: August 26, 1988 51o -3- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HEN~IE?IN Theodore W. Fox, Petitioner, vs. County of Eennepin, Respondent. TAX COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT File No. TC-7138 Dated: December 12, 1988 The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Arthur C. Roemer, Judge of the Minnesota Tax Court, on October 18, 1988 at the Hennepin County Juvenile Justice Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Theodore W. Fox, the petitioner,, appeared pro se. Lee Barry, Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, appeared for respondent. Post-trial briefs were filed by both parties and the case was submitted to the Court for decision on December 2, 1988. The Court, having heard and considered the evidence adduced at the hearing and upon ail of the files and records herein, now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Petitioner has sufficient interest in the property to maintain this petition; all statutory and jurisdictional requirements have been complied with, and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action and the parties hereto. 7. The Court finds the fair market values for the subject properties as of January 2, 1987 to be as follows: Unit A-109 Unit C-203 UnitD-206 Unit F-106 40,000 43,000 52,500 48,600 8. The Court finds the general level of assessment for residen- rial property in the City of Mound to be 89.3%. In order to equalize the subject properties in the January 2, 1987 assessment~ the fair market values_shall be changed to the following: Unit A-109 Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-106 35,720 38,400 46,880 43,400 9. The attached Memorandum is hereby made a part of these Findings of Fact. ~CONCLUSIONS OF LAWbe the books and 1. The assessor'~ ~timated mar'ket values for the subject property as of 'January 2~l~~shall adjusted on records of the City of Mound and County of Hennepin as follows: FROM Assessor's Unit No. Original EMV A-109 ~ 35,500 C-203 ~ 43,000 D-206 $ 62,100 F-106 $ 48,600 TO Court Determined Value ~ 35,720 (increased)~6) $ 38,400 (reduced) 46,880 (reduced)/~ 43,400 (reduced) 2. Real estate taxes due and payable in 1988 shall be recomputed accordingly and refunds, if any, paid to petitioner as required by such computations, together with interest from the original date of payment. / FOURTH JUDICIAL DiSTRiCT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Theodore W. Fox, Petitioner, vs. FINDINGS OF FACT., CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT County of Hennepin, File No. TC-6191 Respondent. Dated: Augus% 26, 1988 The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Arthur C. Roemer, Judge Qf the Minnesota Tax Court, on May 3, 1988 at the Hennepin County Juveniie Justice Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Theodore W. Fox, the Petitioner, appeared pro se. Mark Chapin, ASsistant ~ennepin County Attorney, appeared for respondent. The sole issue was the January 2, 1986 estimated market .values on. three condominium units located in the Lakewinds Condominium Complex. Post-tria!'briefs were filed by both parties and the case was submitted to the Court for decision on May 31, 1988. The Court, having heard and considered the evidence adduced a~ the hearing and upon al! of the files and records herein, now makes the following: :~ND!NGS OF FACT !. Petitioner has sufficient interest in the property to maintain . ~~on; alt s~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ecu~ ~enents have /' complied ~- and the Court has ju isd~ction over the subject matter w.~h, r . of the action and the parties hereto. 2. The subject property consists of three condominium units located at 4363-4407 Wilshire Boulevard (County Road 125) in Mound, Minnesota, commonly refer.red to as the La'kewinds condominiu~ complex. The units are described as: Unit C-203, Property I.D. No. 19-117-23 13 0090;' Unit D-206, Property I.D. No. 19-117-23 13 0129; and, Unit F-106, Property I.D. No. 19-117-23 24 0060. e held in June, 1986. followS: The petitioner purchased the subject units at an auction sale The price paid for the subject units are as Unit C-203 $ 42,000 ...... Unit D-206 $ 56,000 Unit F-106 $ 41,000 4. The'assessor's estimated' market values for the subject property in the January 2, 1986 assessment are as follows: Unit C'203 $ 62,500 Unit D-206 $ 82,700 Unit'F-106 $ 79,300 5. The respondent, in an appraisal, estimated the fair market values of the subject property as follows: Unit C-203 $ 65,200 Unit D-206 $ 88,800 Unit F-106 $ 73,600 6. The Court finds the fair market values for the subject property as of January 2, 1986 to be as follows: Uni.t C-203 $ 47,000 Unit D-20~ $ 52,500 Unit F-106 $ 48,000 7. The attached Memorandum is hereby made a part of these Findings of Fact. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The assessor's estimated market value for the subject property as of January 2, 1986 shall be reduced on the books and records of the City of Mound and COunty of Hennepin as follows: FROM Assessor's Original E.M.V. TO Court Determined Market Value $ 47,000 52,500 48,000 Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-106 $ 62,500 82,700 79,300 2. ReaI estate taxes due and payable in 1987 shall be recomputed accordingly and refunds, if any, paid to petitioner as r~quired by such computations, together with interest from the original dat~ of payment. LET'jUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. A STAY OF 15 DAYS IS HEREBY ORDERED. BY THE COURT, Arfhur C. Roemer,] Judge Minnesota Tax Court DATED: August 26, 1988 -3- MEMORANDUM At issue is the January 2, 1986 estimated market value (EMV) of the subject property, which consists of three condominium units in a 19!-unit complex (hereinafter "Lakewinds") (Units F-106, D-206 'and C-203). A more detailed description of the condominium complex is contained in a previous case decided by this Court, Harold E.' Farness, et al v. County of Hennepin, Minn. Tax Court File Nos. TC-5005, etc. (January 19, 1988). .The condominium structures were' originally constructed' in 1969 as an apartment building and commencing in 1984 were Converted to condominiums. Initial sales were reasonably brisk, but later 'they declined substan{ially. Intensive sales activities were conducted each year (particularly in the spring and summer). Results were increasingly disc0ura'ging. In order to assist in the sales efforts, an auction sale of a substantial number of the condominium, units was held in June, 1986. The sale was advertised extensively in the newspapers and on radio and television. Several hundred bidders attended the auction. Bidders were required to Submit.in advance a $3,000 cashier's check for each of the first two units that they desired to purchase and a $2,000 cashier's check for each unit in addition to two that they may purchase at the auction. Petitioner submitted an $8,000 cashier's check in advance of the auction, which permitted him to purchase three units. The conditions of the sale provided that the first 30 units placed on for sale would be sold abso!ut'ely, without being subject to rejection by the seller. The seller reserved 'the righ% to reject bid.~ ore: the first 30. Twenty-three additional units .were sold, resu!%ing .n a total of 53 units sold. Twenty-two bids were rejected by the sellers. Unit F-106 was the 9~h unit offered for sa!e, Unit D-206 was. the 32nd unit offered, and Unit C-203 was the 70th unit offered. Mr. Keith Rennerfeldt, appraiser with the ~ennepin County Assessor's Office, testified that the assessor's January 2, r19S5 estimated market values were based upon the value of the units as apartments since the condominium conversion had not been sufficiently completed so as to be considered condominium units. No credible appraisa! was submitted by either party, the petitioner relying almost solely upon the price paid for the subject units in the auction sale six months after the assessment date. This Court has repeatedly held that %'he price p~aid in an arms length sale at or near the assessment date is entitled to great weight. Englehart Building v. County of. Dakota, Minn. Tax Court File Nc. 103974 (March 31, 1988); Nelson v. County of HenneDiq, Minn. Tax Court File No. TC-2787 (February 2-9, 1984); Henricksen v.r'County of Itasca,. Minn. Tax Court File No. 3!C-83-0546 (February 9, 1984). Evidence adduced during~ two days of trial of the Harold 'Farness case, supra,, indicated that, while prices fluctuated somewhat, the list price seemed to establish a more consistent pattern in computing value. For ~ns%ance, as noted in the Farness memorandum (p. i7-1S), the February, !954 sales range~ from $65.54 to $!07.45 per square foot, and March, !9~4 sales ranged $75.63 to $115.14 per square foot. The selling prices ranged from 87.54% to 99.76% of.list in February, 1954, whi~A in'~arch, 1984, 36 of the 37 sales ranged from 90% to 95.7% (%he other sale being 8S.8% of list). By March, i9S5, 6 of 7 ~ ~ being 94%) sales ranged from 83% to 87% of list (the o~he. one · Mr. Rennerfeldt submitted an aDDraisa~ on beha~: cf which indicated the following: Assessor's Selling Appraisal Unit EMV Price Value C-203 $62,500 $42,000 $55,200 D-206 82,700 56,000 88,800 F-!06 79,300 41,000 73,600 However, this appraisal relies upon sales occurring many months before the assessment date. Each of the three units were compared with 3 comparables. Of the 9 sales listed as compar.ables, two thirds of the sales were 1984 sales (several in January and February, 1984, two years before the assessment date); the other third consisted of ! in February, 1985, 1 in ~ar~h, 1985 and one in October, 1985.' He apparel'fly ignored dozens of sales which occurred in late 19B5 and early !986,'and the 53 sales invOlvod in the auction (altho'Ugh he admitted they were arms-length sales). In the Farness Case based upon his' test'imony and the testimony of others,- we stated: Testimony indicated that the condominium market started to decline in 1983 and became more noticeable in 1.984. This was hastened by the decline in interest rates, which made single-family home ownership more available to the purchasing public and resulted in substantial more apartment buildings being constructed. The last condominium to be conver~ed in Minnesota was on Vernon Avenue- in Edina in 1985. Harold E. Farness et al v. County of Hennepin, Minn. Tax Court File Nos. TC-5005, etc' (January 19, 1988), D. 12. tn=, the ma k=t in 19o5 =~.ow_='=-;.~, at the instant ~~~~~i=d .... .... ~ was stable. We rema____d-~ convinced that the market ~apidly declined during !984-~5 and 1986. In addition, Mr. Rennerfeldt, as he did in the Farness case, used as a selling price for. his 9 comparab!es %he unverified selling pr~ce~ shown on the Certificates of Real Estate Value. Based upon substantial uncontroverted testimony in the Farness case, we noted in the memorandum: In the case of the first few sales, little reduction was allowed from the list price or t'he asking price. As sales activities slowed, however, concessions or discounts were allowed by various methods such as interest rate buydowns, additional. decorating, carpeting or appliances. The list price or selling.price remained unchanged, the discounts being in the way of concessions which accelerated in amount due to the soft market. By maintaining the list price or the selling price, the amount of mortgage which could be financed is maximized in instances where the total percentage of the mortgage is based upon the list or selling price. The certificate of real estate value filed by the parties following the sale of a unit reported as'consideration the list or'the asking price of the. respective units. supplied.) (Underlining Harold E~ Farness et al v. County of Hennepiq, Minn. Tax Court File Nos. TC-5005, etc. (January 19, 1988), p.~ 12. in addition, we also .stated: Due to his failure to consider the concessions in the sales to private individuals, Mr. Rennerfe!dt's estimate of market value based only on list price of individual sales is flawed, and little weight is c:ven to his a~oraisa Harold E. Farness et al v. County of Hennepiq, Minn. Tax Court File Nos. TC-5005, etc. !January 19, !988), p. 15. it is apparent from our finding in the Farness case that the selling price disclosed on the Certificates of Real Estate Value were the ~ist orice of the property and not the actual conside':~on paid Due to hi= failure to consider t~ ~ - - .,e concessions in the sazes to privat= individuals, ~r. Rennerfe!d~'s selling prices listed on the comparables were inaccurate. No evidence was introduced into the record as to the actual selling prices of the 9 comparables utilized by Mr. Rennerfeldt. Since Mr. Rennerfeldt's opinion of market value was based solely on' these comparable sales occurring up to two years previous to the assessment date, ignoring the auction sales which occurred 5 months after the assessment date, we again give very little weight to his appraisal. Since 1983, Minn. Stat. § 272.03, subd. 8, reads as follows: Subd. 8. Market value. "Market value' means the usual selling price at the place where.the property to which the term is applied shall be at the time of assessment; being the price which could be obtained at a private sale or an auction sale, if it is determined by the assessor that the price from the auction sale represents an arms length transaction. The price obtained at a forced' sale. shall not be considered~. (Emphasis supplied.) Based upon the extensive advertising, the number of buyers, the units sold and Mr. 'Rennerfeldt's admi'ssion' that the auction sales were arms-length, consideration must be accorded-them. Since the selling prices fluctuate we do not place great weight on the selling price of any individual unit. However, we do place signi- ficant weight on the general level' of selling prices at the auction, as wei~ as ~o, rm . ot .... a s-length sales occu~ing near the assessment date. The auction, sales averaged 56% of the list price (compared to 88% on January 2, 19~5). However, we also recognize,.as testified by Mr. Rennerfeldt, that condominium values were dropping during 1986. Since the auction sales occurred slightly mor°. than 5 months after the assessment date, the value on the assessment date was greater than the value at the time of the auction. After considering these facts and other evidence produced at trial, we find the fair market value as of January 2, 1986 to be .$47,000 for Unit C-203, $52,500 for Unit D-206, and $4~,000 for Unit F-106. Respondent calls our attention to the case o~ ~iv~nskl v. County of Hennepiq, Minn. Tax Court File No. TC-56!3 (December 22, 1987), relating to the January 2, 1986 value of a Lakewinds condom'inium unit sold at the June, 1986 auction. Similar to the present case, the petitioner in Sivinski did not have an opinion of value, but relied upon the sale price at the auction. This Court rejected this argument and affirmed the assessor's EMV. In the memorandum this Court stated: While a sale of a given property near the assessment date is often very good evidence of its market value, that is o'n!y the case where.the sale is an arms-length transaction under the normal constraints of the market place. This auction purchase may not have been a normal market transaction.~ There-was no evidence presented regarding how many potential buyers were bidding. Without that information we do not know if the auction was weighted in favor'of the buyer with ~respect t~ the 30 units which were ~o!d at any price that was bid. It is therefore questionable whether this sale is relevant as proof of the value of the property. No other proof of value was offered by the Petitioners. Sivinski at The Sivinski case was decided before the decision of this Court in the Farness case, supra. As indicated in the memorandum, the evidence in the Sivinski case was meager and failed to establish the facts regarding the auction. Based on the 'decision in the ?arness case and the evidence produced by tke petitioner in this case, we find that the petitioner has met his burden of proof. ' A.C .R. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPiN Theodore W. Fox, TAX COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Petitioner, vs. County of Hennepin, Respondent. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS.OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT File No. TC-7138 Dated: December 12, 1988 The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the Honorable Arthur C. Roemer, Judge of ~he Minnesota Tax Court, on October 18,. 1988 at the Hennepin County Juvenile Justice Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. ~ Theodore W. 'Fox, the petitioner, appeared pro se. Lee Barry, Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, appeared for respondent. Post-trial briefs were filed by both parties and the case was submitted to the Court for decision on December 2, 1988. The Court, having heard and considered the evidence adduced at the hearing and upon all of the files and records herein, now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Petitioner has sufficient interest in the property to maintain this petition; all statutory and jurisdictional requirements have been complied with, and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject.matter of the action and the parties hereto. 2. The subject property consists of four condominium units located at 4363-4407 Wilshire Boulevard (County Road 125) in Mound, Minnesota, commonly referred to as the Lakewinds condominium complex. The units are described as: Unit A-109, Property I.D. No. 19-117-23 13 0025; Unit C-203, Property I.D. No. 19-117-23 13 0090; Unit D-206, Property I.D. No. 19-117-23 13 0129; and, Unit F-i06, Property I.D. No. 19-117-23 24 0060~ The petitioner purchased the subject units as follows: Unit A-109 Negotiated purchase in 10/85 for' ~62,500 Unit C~203 Auction sale 4/86 , Unit D-206 Auction sale 4/86 Unit F-106 Auction sale 4/86 The selling prices of the three units purchased at the auction sale in April, 1986 are disputed. 4. The assessor's estimated market values for the subject roperty in the January 2, 1987 assessment are as.follows: Unit A-109 Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-!06 35,500 43,000 62,100 4'8,600 5. The petitioner, in an appraisal of the subject properties for the January 2, 1987 assessment, estimated the fair market values prior to equalization as follows: Unit A-109 Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-!06 28,291 $-28,857 35,165 35,203 6. The respondent, in an appraisal submitted to the Court, estimated the fair market values as of January 2, 1987 as follows: Unit A-!09 Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-106 40,000 43,000 52,500 48,600 The Court finds the fair market values for the subject properties as of January 2, 1987 to be as follows: Unit A-109 Unit C-203 Unit D~206 Unit F-106 40,000 43,000 52,500 48,600 8. The Court finds the general level of assessment for residen- tial property in the City of Mound to be 89.3%. In order 'to equalize the subject properties in the January 2, 1987 assessment, the fair market values shall be changed to the following: Unit A-109 Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-106 Findings of Fact. 35,720 38,400 46,880 43,400 The attached Memorandum is hereby made a part of these CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The assessor's estimated market values for the subject property as of January 2, 1987 shall be adjusted on the books and records of the City of Mound and County of Hennepin as follows: Unit No. FROM Assessor's Original EMV TO Court Determined Value A-109 ~ 35,500 ~ 35,720 (increased) C-203 $ 43,000 $ 38,400 (reduced) D-206 $ 62,100 $ 46,880 (reduced) F-106 $ 48,600. $ 43,400 (reduced) 2. Real estate taxes due and payable in 1988 shall be recomputed accordingly and refunds, if any, paid to petitioner as required by such computations, together with interest from the original date of payment. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. ORDERED. A STAY OF 15 DAYS IS HEREBY Arthur C. Ro'e Minnesota Tax Court DATED: December 12, 1988 MEMORANDUM The subject property consists of four condominium units (A-109, C-203, D-206 and F-106) in a 19!-unit complex referred to as Lakewinds, and which is located at 4363-4407 Wilshire Boulevard in Mound, Minnesota. The complex comprises two structures, one containing units beginning with A, B and C, and the other containing units beginning with D, E and F. valuation of several of these units has been determined by this Court on two previous occasions for prior assessments. This Court determined the value of many of the Lakewinds units as of January 2, 1985 in the case of Harold E. Farness, et al v. County of Hennepin, Minn. Tax Court File Nos. ?C-5005, etc. (January t9, 1988). The January 2, 1986 estimated market values for three of the units in the instant case were determined by this Court in the case.of Theodore W. Fox v. County of Hennepin, Minn. Tax Court File No, TC-6191 (August The January 2, 1986 values of the respective units, are as 26, 2988). follows: Unit A-109 Unit C-203 Unit D-206 Unit F-106 49,400 (uncontested) 47,000 (Court decision) 52,500 (Court decision) 48,000 (Court decision) We have at issue in this proceeding the January 2,. 1987 estimated market values. The petitioner raises the issues of valu'ation and equalization. Petitioner purchased the subject units in late 1985 and early 198'6. The purchase price is in dispute. The selling price listed on the Certificates of Real Estate Value (CRVs) filed iwth the county auditor substantially exceeds the selling price indicated by petitioner. Data with respect to the acquisit{on of these properties is as follows: List Price Sale Unit~ ~y Developer Date A-109 ~ 62,500 10/85 C-203 74,500 4/86 D-206 101,350 4/86 F-106 82,875 4/86 Type Selling Selling of Trans- Price Per Price Per action CRV Filed Petitioner Negotiated $ 62,500 $ 46,634 Auction 43,500 43,250 Auction 56,000 52,195 Auction 41,000 37,978 The subject complex was constructed in 1969 as apartments and -5- later converted to condominiums. Due to sluggish sales activity, an auction sale was held in April, 1986, at which time 53 units were sold (several more were sold, but the purchasers defaulted). Petitioner, who already owned one unit in the building, purchased three additional units at this auction. Due to overvaluation, this Court reduced the January 2, 1985 and January 2, 1986 estimated market values of the properties at issue in two Court cases-referred to above. The assessor, based upon continuing analyses of the market, made frequent individualized appraisals of the subject property, re,suiting in reductions in valuation. A summary of the January 2, 1987 estimated market values, as well as the values estimated by the petitioner in his appraisal and respondent in two recent appraisals, are as follows: Assessor's Jan. 2, 1987 Petitioner's Unit E.M.V. Appraisal Respondent's Appraisals For County Submitted Board To Court ~.-109 ~ 35,500 -:~ 28,291 '$-.39,400 ~ 40,000 C-203 43,000 28,857 47,800 43,000 D-206 62,100 35,165 69,000 52,500 F-!06 48,600 35,203 54,000 48,600 As indicated earlier, the exact purchase price of the units is in dispute. The respondent utilized the purchase price listed on the CRV filed with the county. The evidence did not disclose who filed the CRVs and, if erroneous, why the error occurred. The petitioner introduced a corrected Certificate of Real Estate Value listing different purchase prices as shown above, but the corrected CRV was never filed. In any event, little reliance is placed upon the purchase price since the purchase of one unit (A-309, which involved a negotiated purchase) occurred 14 months prior to the assessment date at issue, and the other three purchases were at auction sale where the price of the individual units was quite erratic. A more important criteria is the sale of comparable units. A formula based on average auction sale prices was used in the previous case [Fox v. County of Hennepin, Minn. Tax Court File No. TC-6191 (August 26, 1988)] since there were few resales to consider. However, in this case we have a significant number of resales (more current than the auction sales) to consider in determining value. Petitioner, in his appraisal, stressed that important criteria in determining comparables were that the units should be in the same building (Units A, B and C in one building, and Units D, E and F in the other building), whether the units are underground or what floor they are on, and lastly, the view. -There is a significant difference in value based upon the view since units on one side have a view of . Lake Minnetonka, on ~another side a partial View, on a third side a view of Black Lake some distance away, and on the fourth side a view of the parking lot. However, in the,selection of his comparables, petitioner disregarded these criteria. For instance, he compared Unit C-203, which has a view of Lake Minnetonka, with four sales of units overlooking the parking lot, one overlooking the woods and another overlooking Black Lake. No adjustments were made to reflect the difference in value attributable to the view or any other differences between the subject and the alleged comparable. Petitioner also stressed the "great [valuation] decline of 1986" (brief, p.3). However, no evidence was introduced at trial regarding market trends. In any event, any valuation declines are reflected in comparable sales, most of which occurred in 1987. The respondent submitted an appraisal by Keith M. Rennerfeldt, Principal Appraiser in the County Assessor's Office. In the case of each of the four units, the subject property was compared with two comparable sales which occurred during 1987. Adjustments were made for dock rights, view, garage, carport, walk-out, balcony, corner units and third floor. 'The petitioner argued that the amount for some of these adjustments was erroneous. We agree that that may have been the case, but petitioner presented no data on which this Court. might determine a more accurate adjustment. In fact, as pointed out earlier, the petitioner made no adjustments whatsoever for such critical differences as view, basements versus upper level, or lenities. In Mr. Rennerfeldt's sales comparisons (Exhibit B), he listed as the selling price from the developer to the original purchaser the selling' price disclosed on'the unverified certificate of Real Estate Value filed with the county. This was found to be erroneous in both previous decisions in that the price listed on the CRV was not the actual selling price in most instances since discounts from the list price were deducted by the developer. However, in this case this was presented for informational purposes only since the actual selling price utilized in the comparison was not the initial sales price from the developer to the initial purchaser, but a subsequent resale of the property which ocCurred between private parties. We find Mr. Rennerfeldt's appraisal to be far more accurate than the appraisal of the petitioner. Petitioner also argued that in order to achieve equalization, the fair market Value should be multiplied by an equalization ratio of 93%, the announced goal of the Cottonwood County assessor in the January 2, 1984 assessment; which the petitioner noted in the findings of this Court in an earlier case, the name of that case not being ,addressed. The January 2, 1984 equalization goal of the Cottonwood County assessor is wholly irrelevant in determining the January 2, 1987 level of assessment of residential property in the City of Mound (Hennepin County). Since Hamm v. State, 255 Minn. 64, 95 N.W.2d 649 (1959), a taxpayer could obtain a reduction in the assessor's valuation if it was shown that the property was systematically, arbitrarily or intentionally valued substantially higher than other property of the same class in the same taxing district. Minnesota case law, after the Hamm decision, interpreted the ,same taxing district" to be the city or township where the property was · located. Bethke v. County of Brown, 301 Minn. 380, 223 N.W.2d 757 (1974); Johnson v. County of Ramsey, 290 Minn. 307, 187 N.W.2d 675 (1971); Dulton Realty, Inc. v. State, 270 Minn. 1, 187 N.W.2d 394 (1964). What constitutes the same "taxing district" was expanded by statute in 1980. Act of Apr. 3, 1980, ch. 443, ~ 2, 1980 Minn. Laws 270 (codified at Minn. Stat. ~ 278.01, subd. 1 [1982]). Minn. stat. ~ 278.01, subd. 1 (1986) provides as follows: Any person having any estate, right, title, or interest in or lien upon any parcel of land, who claims that such property has been partially,-- unfairly, or unequally assessed in comparison with other property ~n the city or county, or that the parcel has been assessed at a valuation greater than ~ts real or actual value, . . ., may have the validity of the claim, defense, or objection determined by =be district court of the county in which the tax is levied or by the tax court .... (Underlining supplied') Minn. Stat. ~ 278.05, subd. 4, authorizes this Court to take judicial notice of the assessment/sales ratio study prepared by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The 9-month study released by the Department of Revenue with respect to the January 2, 1987 assessment contains the following information with respect to residential property in the City of Mound: Mean Residential Property in City of Mound: 89.1 Median Aggregate 89.3 87.7 f Items 191 Based upon that study, we find the equalization ratio relatin~ to residential property in the City of Mound to be 89.3%. This ratio has been applied to the fair' market value in computing the estimated market values of the subject property in the January 2, 1987 assessment. A.C.R. From The Desk Of F.H. Livingston 5251 Bartlett Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Ja.nuary 18, 1989 Dear Relatives and Friends from around the World: I ~m overjoyed with over 300 greetings for my 99th birthday and Chris~mas. I had just recovered from a hip fracture in June and got out of the hospital and then rest home after a total cost of over $10,000. I c~me home as arranged by my son Robert who flew from his California home. I was getting settled when a flood of wonderful gifts of candy, fruit, nuts, etc. came pouring in. My refrigerator was loaded and I was arranging room for supplies and was careless in my kitchen. I fell hard - cracked a rib and injured my spine. 1%ay on the floor 24 hours before the lady who checks to see I am OK came and called the ambulance. I went to Methodist ~ospital and then to a rest home, and recently 'grandson Rand came and took me home where I now get about in a wheelchair and hope to get back to normal.again. The first hip suargerY was a resUlt of mY watering 'the dry lawn when I knew I should quit. I lay on the grass some time before my good neighbor Jane heard my call'for help and called an ambulance and I went to Waconia Hospital. I had hip surgery and stayed at Twin Birch Rest Home for a total cost of almost $11,000. I still have recent hospital and rest home bills to come in 1989. I am still learning the expensive way and lucky to celebrate my 99th. Thanks to all you wonderful folks and sorry I can't write each'one of you as your experiences differ widely, but I enjoy hearing from you. Better '1989, and I hope to make 100, God willing. Ever grateful, Fra~ Livingston (now 99) Mo~d, Mi~. , - -- -- z; ~33 From The Desk Of' F.H. Livingston 5251 Bartlett Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 January 18, 1989 Dear Relatives and Friends from around the World: I am overjoyed with over 300 greetings for my 99th birthday and Christmas. I had just recovered from a hip fracture in June and got out of the hospital and then rest home after a total cost of over $10,000. I c~me home as arranged by my son Robert who flew from his California home. I was getting settled when a flood of wonderful gifts of candy, fruit, nuts, etc. came pouring in. My refrigerator was loaded and I was arranging room for supplies and. was careless in my kitchen. I fell hard - cracked a rib and injured my spine. I l~y on the floor 24 hours bgfore the lady who checks to see I am OK came and called the ~mhulance. I. went to Methodist Hospital and then to a rest home, and recently 'grandson Rand came and took me home where I now get about in a wheelchair and hope to get back to noz...~l again. The first hip surgery was a result of mY watering the dry lawn when I knew I should quit. I lay on the grass some time before my good neighbor Jane heard my call for help and called an ~mhulance and I went to Waconia Hospital. I had hip surgery and stayed at Twin Birch Rest Home for a total cost of almost' $11,000. I still have recent hospital and rest home bills to come in 1989. I am still learning the expensive way and lucky to celebrate my 99th. Thanks to all you wonderful folks and sorry I can't write each 'one of you as your experiences differ widely, but I enjoy hearing from you. Better 1989, and I hope to make i00, God willing. Ever grateful, .~ " ~2 .,. Frank Livingston (now 99) Mound, Minn. From The Desk Of F.H. Livingston 5251 Bartlett Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 January 18, 1989 Dear Relatives ~nd Friends from around the World: I am overjoyed wit~ over 300 greetings for my 99th birthday and Christmas. I had just recovered from a hip fracture in June and got out of the hospital and then rest home after a total cost of over $10,000. I came home as arranged by my son Robert who flew from his California home. I was getting settled when a flood of wonderf, ul gifts of candy, fruit, nuts, etc. came pouring in. My refrigerator was loaded and I was arranging room for supplies and was careless in my kitchen. I fell hard - cracked a rib and injured my spine. I !.ay on the floor 24 hours before the lady who checks to see I am OK came and called the ambulance. I went to Methodist Hospital and then to a rest home, and recently grandson Rand came and took me home where I now get about in a wheelchair and hope to get .back to normal _again. The first hip surgery was a result of my watering the dry. lawn when I knew I should quit. I lay on the grass some time before my good neighbor Jane heard my call for help and called an ambulance and I went to Waconia Hospital. I had hip surgery and stayed at Twin Birch Rest Home for a total cost of almost $11,000. I still have recent hospital and rest home bills to come in 1989. I ~m still learning the expensive way and lucky to celebrate my 99th. Thanks to all you wonderful folks and sorry I can't write each one of you as your experiences differ widely, but I enjoy hearing from you. Better i989, and I hope to make 100, God willing. Ever grateful, Frank Livingston (now 99) Mound, Minn. - LAKE ~4~~~/ 402 EAST LAKE STREET MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-;'033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS JoEIlen L Hurr, Chair Orono Thomas Reese, Vice Chair Mound Jan Boswinkeh Secretary Minnetonka Beach Mark WestlunO, Treasurer Wayzata Marvin Bjorlin Tonka Bay David Cochran Greenwood Albed O. Foster Deephaven James N. Grathwot Excelsior Ron Kraemer Spring Park John Lewman Minnet rista John G, Malinka Victoria Robed K. Pillsbury Minnetonka Robed Rascop Shorewood Robert E Slocum VVoodland TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1989 SUBJECT: JANUARY REPORT - LMCD 1. Eurasion Watermilfoil Task Force. To date $65,000 in voluntary private donations has been received. This is short of the amount needed to capitalize the project according to the original plan. Accordingly, an alternate plan is being developed which involves contracting with a private £n'm who either presently owns, or will purchase the equipment necessary to initiate the program. This will increase the cost, but spread it out into the future so that the program can start in 1989. Negotiations with such a finn are presently underway. This co .uld still change as funds continue to come in. At least one sponsor has come forward who may be willing to donate a Harvester to the program. The cost to privately contract the operation is thought to be in the $300400,000 area for the 1989 season, at full planned scale. The privately donated funds, the new money from the lake cities, plus an amount presently being negotiated from other governmental bodies will be key to the successful implementation of the alternate plan. Meetings have been held this month with the Hennepin County. Commissioners and with the Hennepin County Public Works. No acuon was expected from the Commissioners, but they were made aware of the fact that we will be coming to them for assistance. The Public Works expressed a willingness to work with us, probably in the area of supervision and direction of the harvesting effort. Surburban Hennepin Parks has signalled that they are now willing to donate some staff assistance and perhaps funds to the weed control effort. Further meetings with them are planned for next week. A meeting was held with Senator Gen Olson and Rep Brian Stanius of White Bear Lake to see what might be done at the legislature to partially fund the weed program. A bill is presently being drafted that will address this issue on a seven county wide basis. Chances of success are uncertain. We will be given another opportunity to give an update on the weed control program on the Jim Rogers program on WCCO at 10:15 PM, February 20th. The critical mass is starting to be approached on this program. Each day brings in new persons eager to assist in some way. 2. Comprehensive Lake Management Plan The third meeting of the Shoreland Management Plan Subcommittee was held February 9th. A draft shoreland plan has been drawn and was discussed at this meeting. To date, there has been good input from all 14 cities. This has mostly been in the form of staff persons, rather than council members and mayors. It is being assumed that the attending staff members are discussing draft contents with their councils. The draft of the Fisheries portion of the Natural Environment Section of the plan has been completed and was discussed at the Advisory Committee meeting on February 8th. The next Section to be drafted will be Public Safety. Meanwhile preliminary work goes forward on the Public Access and Use section Funding for the second half of this study remains undetermined. Two potential sources are being pursued: an interest free $100,000 "loan" from the Metropolitan Council, or a bill in the legislature for funding such studies statewide. In this we are joining with the DNR. 3. Chapman Place Docks After more than two years of tedious manueverings and negotiating, clear title to the docks ,has been obtained by the Chapman Place Owners' Association. An arms length operating agreement with an outside party that satisfies LMCD roles has'been concluded. A new dock plan, totally conforming except for a 29' length variance has been tentatively approved. New, seasonal docks will be installed for the 1989 season. (If there is a 1989 season.) 4. Bass Fishing Contest A permit has been issued for a Bass Fishing ~ontest June 4th, to the American Scholarship Foundation. This assembles at Goose Island, and has the weigh in in Mound Bay park. This group is headed up by Howard Tripp of Mound, who is the Bass representative on the LMCD. They are a very responsible organization. Another permit is in the process for another group. 5. Miscellaneous items. The District has held the fn'st public meeting on the low water situation and how to deal with it in the 1989 season. Some temporary role revisions on dock lengths, mooring, and dredging will doubtless result. A sub-committee has been formed to make some recommendations on what can be done to control wake generation from large boats. This is the primary cause of safety complaints on the lake. Tom Reese Mound Repres..entafive .