1989-07-11 CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
/~ G E N D A
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, JULY 11, 1989
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Pledge of Allegiance.
Approve the Minutes of the June 27, 1989, Regular
Meeting. Pg. ~209-2220
CASE %89-830:
Thomas & Arlene Green, 1725 Shorewood
Lane, Lots 2 & 3, Block 5, Shadywood
Point, PID #13-117-24 11 0022/0023/
0018.
Request: Minor Subdivision·
Request from Mr. Archaumbault, 1676 Avocet Lane
to appear before the Council regarding exterior
storage.
DISCUSSION:
Dram Shop Liability Insurance
Requirements in the City Code -
Earl Bailey, R. L. Youngdahl &
Associates.
Authorization for Hennepin County to Erect "No
Parking Anytime" signs on a portion of County
Road 110.
Comments & Suggestions from citizens present.
Pg. 2221-2230
Pg. 2231-2236
Pg. 2237-2242
Pg. 2243-2244
Authorization for Mayor & City Manager to sign
Construction Cooperative Agreement for a traffic
control signal system - CSAH 110 at CSAH 15
(north junction) (Commerce Blvd. and Lynwood
Blvd.)
Payment of Bills
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOus:
Pg. 2245-2254
Pg. 2255-2265
Dept. Head Monthly Reports for June 1989.
LMCD Mailings.
LMCD Budget.
Pg. 2266-2300
Pg. 2301-2303
Pg. 2304-2312
Page 2207
De
E®
He
Notice from the Department of Public Service
on our application for a Community Energy
Grant. Our application has been approved in
the amount of $25,765.
Pg. 2313
LMCD Representative's monthly report.
Pg. 2314-2315
Planning Commission Minutes of June 26, 1989. Pg. 2316-2318
Annual National League of Cities Congress
of Cities to be held in Atlanta, Georgia,
November 25-29, 1989. Please let Fran know
before August 28th if you are interested
in attending. (You received this brochure
separately.)
REMINDER: Meeting with CBD Parking Committee at
7:00 P.M., Tuesday, July 11, prior to
the Council Meeting.
(Materials to be distributed Tuesday evening.)
REMINDER: Dedication of Philbrook Park - 10:00 A.M.,
Saturday, July 8.
to attend.
Please make every effort
Page 2208
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
CBD PARKING
PARCEL 1 - DAKOTA RAIL PROPERTY NORTH OF TRACKS
Present City Lease
Area for Sale
Total
7,900 SF
13,000 SF
20,900 SF
Railroad Asking Price
Sale Price of Adj. Property
Possible City Offer
20,900 SF @ 8.00/SF = $167,200.00
20,900 SF @ 4.00/SF = $ 83,600.00
20,900 SF @ 1.50/SF = $ 31,350.00
New Lease option discussed with Dakota Rail = 20,900 SF @ $0.35/SF = $7,315.00 per year
PARCEL 2 - DAKOTA RAIL PROPERTY SOUTH OF TRACKS
Present City Lease
Area of Existing Bit. Parking Lot
62' x 555' = 34,410 SF
62' x 500' += 31,000 SF
Railroad Asking Price
Sale Price of Adj. Property
Possible City Offer
31,000 SF @ 8.00/SF = $ 248,000.00
31,000 SF @ 4.00/SF = $124,000.00
31,000 SF @ 1.50/SF = $ 46,500.00
New Lease option discussed with Dakota Rail = 31,000 SF @ $0.35/SF = $10,850.00 per year
PARCEL 3 - DAKOTA RAIL PROPERTY AD|. TO ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Present City Lease
24' x 260' = 6,240 S.F.
Railroad Asking Price
Sale Price of Adj. Property
Possible City Offer
6,240 SF @ 8.00/SF = $ 49,920.00
6,240 SF @ 4.00/SF = $ 24,960.00
6,240 SF @ 1.50/SF = $ 9,360.00
New Lease option discussed with Dakota Rail = 6,240 SF @ $0.35/SF = $ 2,184.00 per year
SUMMARY
Three Parcels Combined
58,140 SF @ 8.00/SF = $ 465,120.00
58,140 SF @ 4.00/SF = $ 232,560.00
58,140 SF @ 1.50/SF = $ 87,210.00
Possible Lease = 58,140 SF @ 0.35/SF = $20,349.00 per year
POSSIBLE METHODS OF FINANCING
50% coat by City (Capital Improvement Debt 6ervice Fund)
50% assessed to Benefiting Properties
PARCEL I
PARCEL 2
Option lA City Financed $ 83,600.00 Option 2A
Assessed $ 83,600.00
Option lB City Financed $ 41,800.00 Option 2B
Assessed $ 41,800.00
Option 1C City Financed $15,675.00 Option 2C
Assessed $15,675.00
City Financed $124,000.00
Assessed $124,000.00
City Financed $ 62,000.00
Assessed $ 62,000.00
City Financed $ 23,250.00
Assessed $ 23,250.00
PARCEL 3
Option 3A City Financed $ 24,960.00
Assessed $ 24,960.00
Option 3B City Financed $12,480.00
Assessed $12,480.00
Option 3C City Financed $ 4,680.00
Assessed $ 4,680.00
SUMMARY
Three Parcels Combined
Option A
City Financed $ 232,560.00
Assessed $ 232,560.00
Option B City Financed $116,280.00
Assessed $116,280.00
Option C City Financed $ 43,605.00
Asssessed $ 43,605.00
EXAMPLE OF ASSESSMENT FOR THREE PARCELS COMBINED - OPTION B
City would pay 1/2 of Purchase Price ($116,280.00)
Remaining 1/2 ($116,280.00) could be assessed to benefitting properties over a period of 10
years or $11,628.00 + interest per year.
100
J~ne 27, 1989
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 27, 1989
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, June 27, 1989, following the Board of
Review, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said
City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Liz Jen-
sen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Councilmember Andrea Ah-
rens was absent and excused. Also present were: City Manager
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Attorney Curt.Pear-
son, City Engineer John Cameron, Building Official Jan Bertrand,
and the following interested citizens: Freda Olson, Clarkson
Lindley (representing Freda Olson), Oswin Pflug, Clayton & Gona
Olson, John Morgan, Jack Wang, Dennis Sandin, David Thill, Craig
Watson, Daniel Johnson, Percival Jacobson, Melvin Zuckman, Daniel
DeMatteo, Bill McNamee, Jack Diesing, and Karin Hawkinson.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten-
dance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
MINUTES
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to approve the
minutes of the June 13, 1989, Regular Meeting and the June
20, 1989, Committee of the Whole Meeting, as submitted. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE ~89-826:
MELVIN ZUCKMAN, 5012 TUXEDO BLVD., TRACT At RLS
1150, PID ~24-117-24 43 0034, VARIANCE TO ALLOW
TWO PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES ON ONE ZONING LOT
The Mayor explained that a letter from Mr. Zuckman's attorney has
been received asking that this item be tabled at this time.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to table Case #89-
826, Melvin Zuckman, 5012 Tuxedo Blvd., Tract A RLS 1150,
PID #24-117-24 43 0034, variance to allow two principal
structures on one zoning lot for 90 days. The vote was un-
animously in favor. Motion.carried.
PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was
$2,694.54. Mayor Smith opened the Public Hearing regarding
delinquent utility bills. There was no one present who wished to
speak on this issue. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
101
June 27, 1989
RESOLUTION 89-68
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,694.54
AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF
WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT - PRIVATE PORTION
OF DENBIGH ROAD
The City Engineer explained the background for this improvement.
He showed the approximate area for the easements and explained
that no survey has been done and the drawings were done when the
watermain was installed in 1974. The improvement would be for
concrete curb and gutter, an 18 foot two way paved road and storm
sewer installation. The estimated cost in 1983 was $29,000 and
in 1989 it is $41,000. He further explained that there is an er-
ror in the lineal feet for the Freda Olson property. It should
be 75 feet not 95 feet.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Clarkson Lindley (representing Freda olson, 4414 Wilshire Blvd.)
- stated that the only issue left was payment for the land taken
because they feel there is no benefit to Ms. Olson.
The -City Attorney explained that the Staff recommendation was
that Ms. Olson be paid the amount of her assessment, around
$3,700 and he agrees with that recommendation.
oswin Pflug, 4400 Denbigh Road, stated he felt all parties should
be treated the same and if Ms. Olson was to be paid for her
property then he should also be paid.
Clarkson Lindley stated that Ms. Olson does not need another
driveway to her property but they are willing to negotiate a
settlement for the land proposed to be taken.
Freda Olson, read a statement agreeing with Mr. Lindley's earlier
statements.
Jack Wang, 4409 Denbigh Road andJohn Morgan, 4400 Wilshire Blvd.
stated they would like to see the project proceed.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The Council discussed various items in the assessment policy.
The city Attorney explained that if a negotiated settlement is
not made with Ms. Olson and the Council decides to proceed with
the improvement, then the City would have to start condemnation
proceedings. He then explained the condemnation process. He en-
couraged negotiation of a settlement because it would be
102
June 27, 1989
less costly and much more' efficient.
Clarkson Lindley submitted a proposed resolution which would
delete his client, Ms. Olson, from the assessment and further
stated the following:
a. any private property to be taken, in fee or by ease-
ment, from landowners not petitioning for said improvement, to be
paid at fair market value; and
b. that the 10" sugar maple to be taken by the project be
replaced by a 6" sugar maple; and
c. that at the same time as acceptance and dedication of
Denbigh Lane as a public road, the affected property owners
provide evidence to the City that, upon dedication as a public
road, the various private easements which now permit Denbigh Lane
to exist as a private street, will be extinguished and that such
evidence is or will be recorded against the respective titles of
the affected properties."
The City Attorney advised the Council that they can order the im-
provement, have plans and specifications drawn, bids can be taken
with hegotiations still proceeding.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-69
RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT OF A
NOW PRIVATE PORTION OF DENBIGH ROAD AND
ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH IMPROVEMENT
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CASE #89-821: CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY AND
FINAL PLAT FOR COMMERCE PLACE
The Building Official explained that the City Engineer and the
City Planner reCommended approval contingent upon the following:
ae
Documentation furnished to show that the proposed lot
lines are located within the common walls.
Some existing easements running in favor of the City of
Mound along the south side adjacent to Lynwood Blvd.,
which should be shown on the final plat.
Obtaining an easement, sufficient in size to cover the
watermain, curb stops and hydrant installed through Lot
6 between Lynwood Blvd. and Church Road.
de
A satisfactory resolution to the problem of the trash
enclosure projecting into the City right-of-way on Fern
103
June 27, 1989
Lane.
e. Signage continuity be maintained.
The Planning Commission recommended approval contingent upon the
City Engineer's and City Planner's recommendations being met and
the City Attorney researching the need for agreements relating to
the encroaching dumpster and signage continuity.
The City Engineer stated that he has now received a revised plat
from JRW Properties.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mayor closed the public hearing.
There was no response. The
The Council discussed the trash enclosure encroachment and the
signage continuity. The City Attorney stated the signage con-
tinuity can be incorporated in the Declaration of Covenants,
Restrictions and Easements. The Council asked that the dumpster
encroachment be removed from the City right-of-way before this
plat will be released.
Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution incor-
porating all the recommendations from the City Engineer and City
Planner and having the dumpster encroachment on City right-of-way
removed before the plat will be released.
RESOLUTION %89-70 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF
COMMERCE PLACE - PID %13-117-24 33 0074
- P & Z CASE %89-821
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CASE ~89-822: CONSIDER /% PRELIMINARY AND
FINAL PLAT FOR LANGDON VIEW LOCATED AT BEACH-
WOOD ROAD AND COMMERCE BLVD.
The Building Official explained that the Planning Commission
recommended approval contingent upon the City Engineer's recom-
mendations. These have been incorporated into the proposed
resolution. The Building Official further recommended that the
following item be added to the proposed resolution under A.:
tt7 .
The Developer is to establish an escrow account to
cover legal, engineering and administrative fees."
The city Engineer asked the A. #2 be revised to read as follows:
"2.
The Developer is to sign a Development Contract and
furnish the City a Performance Bond in the amount of
$15,000 to cover grading and drainage improvements for
the entire plat and the installation of sewer and water
services for Lots 2, 4, and 5 as per plans approved by
104
June 27, 1989
the City Engineer."
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mayor closed the public hearing.
There was no response. The
The Council questioned the $15,000 Performance Bond asking if it
was enough. The City Engineer stated that in other communities
the Developer submits his engineer's estimate and the City En-
gineer verifies that but in Mound the City Engineer submits an
estimate, so this is the City's estimate. The Engineer suggested
that the grading be done and sewer and water services be put in
before any building permits are issued.
The Council asked if parking would be restricted to one side of
Beachwood when the development is put in. The City Engineer
stated yes.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution with
the changes as stated above:
RESOLUTION #89-71
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY
AND FINAL PLAT OF LANGDON VIEW SUBDIVI-
SION (PID #23-117-24 13 0066, 0012, 0015
AND 0014) - P & Z CASE #89-822
The Vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE ~89-815:
SCOTT HILL, 4984 THREE POINTS BLVD., LOTS 11, 12,
13, 14, BLOCK 25, SHADYWOOD POINT, PID ~13-117-24
11 0105 & 0106, MINOR SUBDIVISION
The Building Official explained the request and stated the Plan-
ning Commission recommended approval. Mr. Thill was present and
asked about any assessments or liens against the piece of
property he would be getting. The City Attorney told Mr. Thill
that was between he and his neighbor and not a City issue, but he
should look into the matter to protect himself.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-72
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINOR SUBDIVISION
OF LOTS 11, 12t 13t 14, BLOCK 25,
SHADYWOOD POINTv PID %143-117-24 11 0105
& 106, (4984 & 4978 THREE POINTS BLVD.),
P & Z CASE #89-815
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE ~89-823:
CRAIG WATSON, 4610 TUXEDO BLVD., LOT 1, BLOCK 7,-
PEMBROKE, PiD ~19-117-23 33 0039# RECOGNIZE AN EX-
ISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE AND ALLOW A REAR
YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
105
June 27, 1989
The Building Official explained the request and that the Planning
Commission recommended approval with a new survey to be sub-
mitted. The Applicant was present and stated he is waiting for
the new survey.
Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-73
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO RECOGNIZE A NONCONFORMING
STRUCTURE AND TO ALLOW A REAR YARD SET-
BACK VARIANCE FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 7,
PEMBROKE, PID %19-117-23 33 0039, (4610
TUXEDO BLVD.), P & Z CASE 989-823
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE %89-824:
DANIEL JOHNSON, 1766 SHOREWOOD LANE, LOT 4, BLOCK
3, SHADYWOOD POINT, PID %13-117-24 11 0135, FRONT
YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
The Building Official explained the request and what the Planning
Commission recommended. The applicant was present and stated he
has revised his plans.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to table this item
and refer it back to the Plannlng Commission for recon-
-.sideration. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
CASE %89-825:
PERCIVAL JACOBSON, 4700 WILSHIRE BLVD., LOTS
1,2,3,16,17 & 18, BLOCK 31, SETON, PID %19-117-23
23 0112/0119t FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE
The Building official explained the request.
mission recommended approval.
The Planning Com-
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-74
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO ALLOW A FENCE HEIGHT
VARIANCE FOR LOTS 1,2,3,16,17 & 18,
BLOCK 31, SETON, PID %19-117-23 23
0112/0119, P & Z CASE %89-825
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE %89-827:
DANIEL & DIANE DE MATTEO, 5145 EMERALD DRIVEr LOTS
2, 3, & PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT
C, PID %24-117-24 13 0037, RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING
NONCONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO ALLOW STRUC-
TURAL MODIFICATIONS
106
June 27, 1989
The Building official explained the request. She explained that
the Planning Commission did not agree with the staff recommenda-
tion to just remove the 1.4 foot portion of the garage that is
encroaching on Emerald Lane and approve the 20 foot front yard
setback variance for the existing detached accessory building.
They recommended removing enough of the structure to meet the
setback to Emerald Lane. She further explained that this is a
concrete block building and is not movable.
Mr. DeMatteo was present and agreed with the Building Official's
recommendation. The Council discussed the case and stated they
would treat this as they had on encroachments on Commons, to
remove the part that was encroaching.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 989-75
RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NON-
CONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO ALLOW
STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS FOR LOT 2, 3, 7
PART OF LOT 1~ BLOCK 1~ SHIRLEY HILLS
UNIT 3, PID %24-117-24 13 0037 (5145
EMERALD LANE), P & Z CASE 989-827
The v'ote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
APPLICATION FOR A SIGN PERMIT FOR LIGHT OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTE~
AT WESTONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES
The Building Official explained the sign permit request is for a
quasi-public ,organization and needs to be approved by the Coun-
cil.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to authorize is-
suance of a sign permit to Light of Life Christian Center at
Westonka Community Services. The sign will be a portable
sign to broadcast special speakers for religious events and
also to make known the time/date/place of church meetings.
Size is 3, x 6, and will be located between Westonka Com-
munity Services Building and the Pond Arena. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
There was no response.
BID AWARD: REPAIRS TO COUNTY ROAD 110
The City Engineer explained that these repairs are needed because
of a watermain break last winter across from the new bank. The
engineer's estimate for the repair is $14,522.00. He then.
reviewed the bids that were received:
Aero Asphalt, Inc.
$12,355.48
107
June 27, 1989
Midwest Asphalt
Valley Paving
Buffalo Bituminous
Alber Construction
Munn Blacktop
H. L. Johnson
Bituminous Roadways
$12,576.15
$12,730.00
$14,804.50
$18,147.00
$21,440.00
$22,706.00
$24,101.90
The Engineer recommended the low bid of Aero Asphalt, Inc. at
$12,355.48.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-76 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE BID FOR THE
REPAIRS TO COUNTY ROAD 110 TO AERO
PHALT, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,355.48
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION AMENDING STANDARDS & GUIDELINES FOR DEFERRAL OF SPE-
CIAL ASSESSMENTS BECAUSE OF H~RDSHIP FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
The City Clerk reported that 'this would change the gross income
from '$10,001 to $12,500 and the interest rate from 6% to 8%.
Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-77
RESOLUTION AMENDING STANDARDS &
GUIDELINES FOR DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL
ASSESSMENTS BECAUSE OF HARDSHIP FOR
SENIOR CITIZENS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION TO RENAME COUNTY ROAD 15
The City Manager stated that changing the name of County Road 15
from Shoreline Boulevard to Shoreline Drive will make the name
uniform from Navarre to Mound.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-78 RESOLUTION TO RENAME COUNTY ROAD 15
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
LIQUOR STORE LEASE
The city Manager explained that this is a three year lease and
that the price per square foot is the same ($7.50) as we have
paid the last two years.
108
June 27, 1989
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %89-79
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH
MARK SALITERMAN FOR MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
STORE
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
NORWOOD LANE/BARTLETT BLVD. FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST
The City Engineer explained that this project is completed and
recommended approval of the final payment to Hardrives in the
amount of $9,500.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to approve a
final Payment Request from Hardrives on Norwood
Lane/Bartlett Blvd. Storm Sewer Improvements in the amount
of $9,500.00. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
MAINTENANCE PERMIT
The city Manager explained that Park Commission recommended ap-
proval of a maintenance permit for Michael Kraemer, 5500 Breezy
Road for 8 steps down to a dock on Waterside Lane.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to approve a
request for Maintenance Permit for Michael Kraemer, 5500
Breezy Road - to construct 8 steps down to dock on Waterside
Lane. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
GAMES OF SKILL ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
The City Clerk explained that if a game is not popular it is ex-
changed for another. Our ordinance currently does not allow the
transfer of a license to another game or device. This amendment
would allow a transfer to another game or device. If would also
eliminate the need to give the name of the game on the applica-
tion because this would change if the game is exchanged.
Johnson moved and Smith seconded.the following:
ORDINANCE #31-1989
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 468:10 OF
THE CITY CODE RELATING TO GAMES OF SKILL
LICENSES
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
ON-SALE WINE LICENSE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
The City Clerk explained that the State Statutes now allow a
holder of an On-Sale Wine License to sell intoxicating malt
109
June 27, 1989
liquor if the Council amends its ordinance to allow this.
D'Vinci's has requested that the Council amend the ordinance to
allow the sale of intoxicating malt liquor.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following:
ORDINANCE 932-1989
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 800:05, 5,
OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO ON-SALE
WINE LICENSES
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
RELEASE OF TAX FORFEIT LAND FOR PUBLIC AUCTION
The City Clerk explained that PID #19-117-23 32 0107 (Lots 16 &
17, Block 10, Wychwood) is a buildable parcel and should be
released for public auction.
Jensen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %89-80
RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT
LANDS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUC-
TION 'AND CERTIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESS-
MENTS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
DISCUSSION: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING PROGRAM
The City Manager explained that the Council has discussed the CBD
Parking Program and the parking lots at a Committee of the Whole
meeting. The railroad will be trying to sell these three parking
lots as the leases with the City expire. The Council talked
about purchasing these lots for municipal parking. Prior to any
offers being made the Council should decide how they are going to
finance the purchase and if the City should purchase these lots
outright as municipal lots or assess a portion or all of the cost
to the Central Business District Parking Program. The Staff is
looking for direction.
Phyllis Johnson was present and stated she feels the City should
purchase these lots as municipal lots and not assess the
businesses.
The Council discussed whether the general taxpayers should pay
for these lots or if they should be assessed to the CBD. No ac-
tion was taken on this item. The Council asked that the CBD
Parking Committee attend a meeting prior to the next Council
Meeting (7:00 P.M., July 11, 1989) to discuss this item further.
SET DATE FOR RECEIVING RFP ON CURBSIDE RECYCLING
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to set the date
110
June 27, 1989
for receiving a request for proposals for curbside recycling
as July 20, 1989, at 11:00 A.M. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
DISCUSSION:
CODE
DRAM SHOP LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS IN CITY
Bill McNamee, owner of the Jock Club, stated he would like the
Council to consider lowering the dram shop liability insurance
requirements in Section 800:10, Subdivision 7 of the City Code
from 300,000/300,000 to 100,000/300,000. He requested this be-
cause his premium for the required amount is considerably more
per year than the reduced amount.
The Council asked that the City Insurance Agent, Earl Bailey,
come to the next Council meeting to explain why he had recom-
mended 300,000/300,000 when the ordinance was amended in 1986o
No action was taken.
LICENSE RENEWALS & NEW LICENSES
The following licenses are up for renewal:
Off-S%le Beer
A1 & Alma's
.Brickley's Market
PDQ Food Store 90292
SuperAmerica #4194
On-Sale Beer
A1 & Alma's
D'Vinci's
House of Moy
Mound Lanes
On-Sale Wine
A1 &Alma's
D'Vinci's
House of Moy
Set-Up
A1 &Alma's
Club License
American Legion #398
VFW #5113
On-Sale Liquor
Mack's Jock Club
Dinner Dance
Mack's Jock Club
Sunday On-Sale Liquor
Mack's Jock Club
VFW #5113
The following are new license requests:
On-Sale Intoxicatinq Beer
D'Vinci's
Juke Box
1 - Mack's Jock Club
Games of Skill
8 - Mack's Jock Club
Our Lady of the Lake Church requested the following licenses for-
the Incredible Festival, July 29 & 30, 1989:
Public Dance Permit & Charitable 3.2 Beer Permit.
111
June 27, 1989
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to authorize the
issuance of the above licenses, contingent upon all required
forms, insurance, etc. being turned in and approval of the
Police Chief where necessary. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount
of $127,448.49, when funds are available. A roll call vote
was 4 in favor with Ahrens absent and excused. Motion
carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS:
Ae
May 1989 Financial Report as Prepared by John Norman,
Finance Director.
B. Park Commission Minutes of June 8, 1989.
C. Planning Commission Minutes of June 12, 1989.
D. k/~CD Mailings.
Mark July 8, 1989, 10:00 A.M. on your calendars for the
-.dedication of Philbrook Park at the park. John Taffe, Jerry
Henke and others are organizing it and a sign will be ready
for that day and time.
F. Hennepin County Compost Site Update.
G. Memo from Jim Fackler regarding Eurasian Water Milfoil.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Council went into Executive Session to discuss labor nego-
tiations at 11:00 P.M. and returned at 11:30 P.M.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at
11:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
Proposed Resolution
Case No. 89-830
REBOLUTION #8g-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR
LOTS 2 & 3, BLOCK 5, AND LOT 18, BLOCK 6, SHADYWOOD POINT
PID #13-]17-2a-11-0022/0023/00]8 (l?2a & ]725 SHOREWOOD LANE)
P&Z CASE NO. 89-830 "
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision of Lots Z & 3, Block 5, and
Lot 18, Block 6, Shadywood Point, PID #13-117-24-11
0022/0023/0018, has been submitted in the manner required for
platting of land under City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 330
and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statute and all
proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and
WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision require-
ments'contained in 5ecti°n 330 of the City Code has been filed
with the City of Mound; and
'WHEREAS, said request fOr waiver has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission and City Council; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that there are special cir-
cumstances affecting said property such that the strict applica-
tion of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of his land; and that the waiver is necessary for
the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right;
and that granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the other property owners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City o¢ Mound, Minnesota:
The request of the applicant for a waiver from the provi-
sions of Section 330 of the City Code and the request to
subdivide property of less than five acres, described as
Follows:
Ali of Lots 2, & 3, Block 5, PID #13-117-24-1100ZZ & 0023;
and all of lot 18, Block 4, PID #13-117-24-ll 0018, all in
Shady~/ood Point.
Page Two
Proposed Resolution
Case No. 89-830
Ae
Ce
De
It ts hereby granted to permit the subdivision as per
the following descriptions as shown on Exhibits A & B
(surveys):
Parcel A: Lot 2 & part of Lot 3, Block 5, Shadywood
Point. Lot area approximately 9,000 square feet (R-I
zoning district).
Parcel B: Lot lB, Block 4, and part of Lot 3, Block 5,
Shadywood Point. Lot area approximately 8,690 square
Feet iR-2 zoning district).
It is determined that the Foregoing subdivision will
constitute a desirable and stable community development
and it is in harmony with adjacent properties.
The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified
copy of this resolution to the applicant For Filing in
the office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of
Titles of Harm.pin County to show compliance with the
subdivision regulations of the City.
This lot subdivision is to be filed and recorded within
180 days of the adoption date of this resolution.
CITY of MOUND
5:~ 1 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 5536~
{612) 472° 1155
CASE NO. 89-830
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
DATE: Planning. Commission Agenda of July lO,
CASE NO.: 89-830
APPLICANT: Thomas & Arlene Green
LOCATION: Lots f & 3, Block 5 (1725 5horewood Lane?)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots Z & 3, Block 5, Shadywood Point
SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision and Lot Size Variance
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 single Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Single Family Residential
PROPOSAL: The applicants are requesting a subdivision to allow
2,500 square Feet of Lot 3 to be added and combined with the
vacant Lot 2, Block 5, Shadywood Point. The remainder of Lot 3
will be approximately 4,000 square feet with an existing detached
garage on that parcel. The 4,000 square foot parcel with the
garage is part of Lot 18, Block 4, across Shorewood Lane.
COMMENTS: The R-I zoning district requires a 10,000 square foot
lot size minimum. The proposed subdivision of Lot 3 would be
added to Lot 2, thereby allowing a 9,000 square Foot lot size
within lO percent of the R-1 district. Lot 18, Block 4 contains
the principal dwelling, is in an R-2 zoning district, and will
have a detached garage across the street on approximately a 4,000
square foot area. This parcel, part of Lot 3 and Lot 18 will
exceed the 6,000 square foot requirement For the R-2 single
family district.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the variance of 1,000 square
feet to allow the subdivision of Lot 3, to be added to Lot 2
creating a 9,000 square foot lot size. Staff recommends approval
of the approximately 4,000 square feet of lot 3, Block 5, to be
combined as one tax parcel with Lot 18, Block 4, Shadywood Point
upon the condition that surveys be submitted to indicate the sub-
division of Lot Z and 3. As for the detached accessory building
on Lot 3, the Planning Commission should set a maximum size for.
the garage for any future' expansion and minimum side and front'
yard setbacks. Staff would recommend 6 Foot side yard minimum
and a 30 foot front yard minimum setback to comply with the R-!
single Family zoning district setbacks.
The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be
referred to the City Council on July II, 1989. ~3
APPLICATION FOR
FEES:
Minor Subdivision
Application ~
Park Dad.
C~cher
Ma.ior Subdivision:
Preliminary Plat $150
Final Plat $]00
Escrow Deposit $1,000
Park Dedication
Other
(Please type or print the ¢011owing InFormation.)
APr1 tcant's Name %~1~5". ~r\~.~R_ ~ ~P-~_~
Day Phone
App I i cant' s
F~e Owner(s)
print name 'print name '
mail lng address ~fling address
Signature o~ Fee Owner i gnature o~ Fee Owner
This application must be signed by all the OWNERS o¢ the property, or an
explan~ton given why this is not the case.
Property!to be divided:
Block ,_~'" P[D #
Existing Use o¢
Zoning District:
Property:
App 1 I cat I on f=or Subcl t v I s I on
Page Two
C~se No.
an application ever been mede for zoning, variance, c~tonal use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? yes ~ no .) If,yes,
ltst date(s) of application, action taken, and provide reso1~t_fu~num~er(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)'
I certify that all oF the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitte~ herewith are true and ac-
curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises ~escrlbed tn this
application by any authorized official oE the City of Mound for the purpose
of inspecting, or of posting, ~intaining anO re~ving such notices as ~y
be required by law.
///////7//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
FOR OFFICE OSE ONLY:
.!
lng Commission Recommendation
Counctl Action:
Date
ReSolution No.
Date
CITY OF MOUND
\.
PART
Case No.~
Date F ilecl ~_-7~__-~
Fee $50.00
VARIANCE APPLICATION
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
(Please type or print the Following information.)
Address of Subject Property
Lot, "
Applicant's Name (if other than owner)
Address
.. Exi. stigg..Use of property.:
Day Phone
Has an application ever been made For zoning, variance, cg~i~tional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? yesJ~n°~ IF yes,
list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolu~:l~n number(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
I certify that all'of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required 'papers or plans to. be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate.' I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
applfcation by any authorized official of the City of Mound Eot the purpose
of inspecting, or of posting, mai~ining ~j~d removing such notices as may
be required by law. ._ ~ , //
AppItcant $' Signature~~~/ Date
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Planning Co~fssion Recommendatlon
Date
Council Action:
Resolution No.
Date
IANCE APPLICATION
Case No.
Does the present use of the property conform to all regu.lations for
the zoning district ih which it l s~ocate~? Yes (.), No ~). IF no,
specify each non-conforming use: ~~<~ ~ ~
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations For the zoning district in which It is located?
Yes ( ), No ( ). IF no, specify each non-conforming use:
Which unique physical characteristics oF the subject property prevent
its reasonable use For any of the uses permitted in that zoning
distri,ct?
too narrow (
too small (
too shallow (
) topography
)'drainage
) shape
( ) soil
( ) sub-surface -
-) other: sp~cify
Was the hardship described above created by the actton of anyone
havlng property Interests in the land after_the .zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes ~2~), No ~:. If yes, explain(~r~t~('~C~ (~ C~.O-~
Was ~he hardship crea~ed by any o~her ~n-~de change, such as the
relocation o~ a road~ Yes (), No~- If yes, explain
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Case No.
Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance
peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ),
(~. If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?
No
~ha~ ts ~he "minimum" mo~fEica=iom (va~fance) ~rom ~he area, bulk, anO
setback ~eguia~ions ~ha= wi ii permt~ you ~o ~ke ~easonab]e use
your land? (Spectf~, using maps, ~te plans with dimensions
ten explanation. ~~ ~O,~-- ~C~ .
Wtll granting, oF the var!ance be materially Oetrimental to property
the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance?
PART ! I !
SITE PLAN INFORMATION: 'All supporting documents such as sketch.plans,
attachmentst etc. t must be submitted in 8-1/2"xll" size· IF laroer
drawings are submitted, one must be 8-l/ZWxll", and I5 iar~er size
copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached.at.a scale large enough For clarity show-
t-ng the Following information:
· Location, area, and dimens;ions oF existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s), driveway(si/street access, oFF-street parking, and
utilities.
Existing and proposed elevations·
Distance between: building and front, sloe and rear 1or lines~
principal building and accessory buildings; principal building
and principal buildings on adjacent lots.
Location oF: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
Indicate "north" compass direction.
Any additional information as may reasonably be required by ~e
city staFE and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance·
30~
o/
19
~9 4
T
~0
Proposed Reso)ution
Case No. 89-830
RESOLUTION #89-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR
LOTS 2 & 3, BLOCK 5, AND LOT t8, BLOCK 6, SHADYWOOD POINT
PID #13-117-24-11-0022/0023/0018 (1724 & 1725 SHOREWOOD LANE)
P&Z CASE NO. 89-830
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision of Lots 2 & 3, Block 5, and
Lot 18, Block 6, Shadywood Point, PID #13-117-24-ll
0022/0023/0018, has been submitted in the manner required For
platting of land under City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 330
and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statute and all
proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and
WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision require-
ments, contained in Section 330 of the City Code has been Filed
with the City of Mound; and
'WHEREAS, said request for waiver has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission and City Council; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that there are special cir-
cumstances affecting said property such that the strict applica-
tion of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of his land; and that the waiver is necessary For
the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right;
and that granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the other property owners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota:
The request of the applicant for a waiver Fr~ the provi-
sions of Section 330 of the City Code and the request to
subdivide property of less than Five acres, described as
follows:
All of Lots 2, & 3, Block 5, PID #13-117-24-11 0022 & 0023;
and all of lot 18, Block 4, PID #13-117-24-11 0018, al) in
Shadywood Point.
Page Two
ProposeO Resolution
Case No. 89-830
"C.
It is hereby granted to permit the subdivision as per
the Following descriptions as shown on Exhibits A & B
(surveys):
Parcel A: Lot 2 and that part of Lot 3 which lies
Southwesterly of the Northeasterly 60.00 Feet of said
Lot 3, Block 5, Shadywood Point, Hennepin County, Min-
nesota. (Lot area lO,O00 square Feet (R-! zoning dis-
trict.)
Parcel B: The Northeasterly 60.00 Feet of Lot 3, Block
5, Shadywood Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (This
parcel is to be combined with Lot I8, Block 4,
Shadywood Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota, creating a
lot area of approximately ?,690 square Feet (R-2 zoning
district.)
It is determined that the foregoing subdivision will
constitute a desirable and stable community development
and it is in harmony with adjacent properties.
The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified
copy of this resolution to the applicant For Filing in
the office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of
Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the
subdivision regulations of the City.
This lot subdivision is to be filed and recorded within
180 days of the adoption date of this resolution.
Planning Commission Minutes
July Il, ]989
e®
Case No. 89-830: Thomas & Arlene Green~ 1724 Shorewood
Lane? Lots 2 & 3~ Block 57 and Lot I8~ Block 4~ Shadywood
Point~ PID #13-117-24-1! 0022/0023/0018. MINOR SUBDIVISION
& LOT SIZE VARIANCE.
The City Planner reviewed the Building Official's recommendation.
The applicants are requesting a subdivision to allow 2,500 square
Feet of Lot 3 to be added and combined with the vacant Lot 2,
Block 5. The remainder of Lot 3 will be approximately 4,000
square feet containing an existing detached garage. The 4,000
square foot parcel with the garage is part of Lot 18, Block 4,
across Shorewood Lane. Lots 2 & 3 are in the R-] zoning district
which requires a minimum lot size of lO,O00 square feet, and lot
18 is in the R-2 zoning district which requires a minimum lot
size of 6,000 square Feet.
Staff recommends approval of the subdivision and lot size
variance For Parcel A of l,O00 square Feet creating a lot size of
9,000 square feet. Staff recommends approval of Parcel B to be
combined as one tax parcel with Lot 18, Block 4 upon the condi-
tion that surveys be submitted to indicate the subdivision of
Lots ~ and 3. The garage on Parcel B must maintain 6 foot side
yard setbacks and a 30 foot front yard setback.
The applicant, Arlene Greene, reviewed the history of their pur-
chase of the land. She stated that they were under the impres-
sion that this was a buildable lot. She also stated that there
are houses along the same street that have received lot size
variances to allow new construction.
Sohns commented that the Planning Commission agreed, when
developing the Comprehensive Plan, that they will no longer use
the 10% rule when determining variance. Meyer agreed that newly
created lots should not be undersized. It was determined that
their is l,O00 square Feet available on Parcel B that could be
used to create a buildable lot of lO,O00 square Feet For Parcel
A.
Andersen commented that allowing Parcel B to be 4,000 square feet
would allow the applicant to prevent such happenings as parking
recreational vehicles next to the street.
MOTION made by Andersen, seconded by Clapsaddle to ap-
prove staff rec~ndation. Motion failed 2 - 5. Those
in favor: Andersen and Clapsaddle. Those opposed:
Sohns, Meyer, Jansen, Thai, and Michael.
Sohns raised a concern with creating a storage lot by using the
area behind the garage, it was noted that there is 26' from the
garage to the proposed rear property line. it was then deter-
mined that to remove 1,000 square Feet from Parcel B, the garage
would then be 6 Feet from the rear property line.
Planning Commission Minutes July Il, ]989
MOTIOfl made by Thai, seconded by Michael to allow the
subdivision upon the condition that Parcel A is 10,000
square feet.
The applicant, Arlene Greene, explained to the Commission again
that there are other homes in the area built on undersized lots.
Meyer explained that the Commission is striving to alleviate the
creation o6 new undersized lots. Thai added that no hardship ex-
ists.
Andersen stated that he feels to deny the lot size variance is
not fair and creates a hardship for the applicants.
MOTION carried 5 - 2. Those in favor: Sohns, Meyer,
Jensen, Thai, and Michael. Those opposed: Andersen and
Clapsaddle.
./
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager
FROH: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
DATE: July 6,1989
SUBJECT: exterior storage in residential districts
DATE: July 6', 1989
I talked to Mr Archambault of 1676 Avocet Lane today. He is not
satisfied with the provisions of the City Code regarding the exterior
storage requirements. He will be attending the next City Council
meeting of July 11, 1989 to comment.
Ed, p~ease have the City Council visit the site before the next
meeting.
equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of raze Co!or. national origin, or handicapped status
In the admission or access to, or treatment or employmen: ~r~ :',s programs and acrid;ties.
CITY of MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 5, 1989
Mr. David Krchambault
1676 Avocet Lane
Mound, MN. 5536&
Dear Mr. Archambault:
It has come to the attention of the Inspection Department that you have
an accumulation of debris and materials, such as, but not limited to,
2 sofas, 4 mattresses, automobile transmission, 2 tires, planks, boards,
fender for an automobile, metal pipes, brush pile of wood, miscellaneous
car parts. This is in violation of Sections 23.702 and 23. 703 of the
City Code.
..Any inoperable and/or unlicensed vehicles such as LUV274 (MN'89),RV16767 (M~'87),
136DLF (M~'90), car chasis, snowmobile, motorcycle must be in your ownership.
and cannot be stored unenclosed on your property andare in violation of Section
23.703 of the City Code, if they do not operate and/or are unlicensed ~
the current year. The recreational vehicles a~e limited in number by the
square footage of the property.
I am enclosing copies of the Zoning Ordinance 23.702, 23.703, and 23.704 fbr
your convenience. It requires in residential districts that all materials and
equipment s~all be stored within a building or fully screened so as not to
be v~sible from adjoining properties.
Containment..for refuse and garbage shall be fly-tight, water-tight, and
cleanable of 32 gallon capacity according to the provisions of City Code
490.05. You will need to remove and/or correct these violations within
30 days. When you feel you have complied with the City Ordinance provisions,
please contact this office to arrange ~einspection of your premises. If you
have any questions regarding this compliance order, please contact me at
the City offices. Your prompt attention-is greatly appreciated.
Yours truly,
~Ja'n Bertrand
BuildinE Official
,m/jb
Enclosures
89/
Appendix B
Approval of a planned industria] area operations permit shall be
by the City Councll after recon~mendation by the City Staff.
At the option of the City Council, the City may elect to call a
public hearing to sollcit publlc input on an operations permit
application. A hearing may be called to review concerns regarding
the use or dlscharge of toxlc substances, emlssions, speclal
access, parking or loading requirements, noise, storage or other
relevant factors,
23.650.7
Criteria.for Granting Operations Permits
The criteria for granting operations permit shall be the :same as the
criteria listed in Section 23.505.1 for the issuance of conditional
use permits·
(Section 23.650- Ord. /481 - ~)-~-85)
SECTION 7. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
23.701 Purpose
23.702
,The performance standards established in this section are designed"to
encourage a high standard of development by providing assurance that
neighboring land uses will be compatlble. The performance standards are
designed to prevent and el-iminate those conditions that cause..bl).ght.
All future deVelopment in an~ district shall be required to meet these
standards. 'The standards shall also apply to existing development where
so stated. The City MAnager shall be responsible for enforcing the
standards.
Before any building permit is approved, the Zoning Administrator shall
determine whether the proposed use will conform to the performance
standards. The developer or land Swners shall supply data necessary to
demonstrate such conformance. Such data may include description of
equipment to be used, hours of operation, method of refuse disposal and
type and location of exterior storage.
Exterior Storage
In residential districts, all' materials and equipment shall be
stored ~ithin a building or fully screened so as not to be visible
from adjoining properties, except for the following: laundry
drying, recreational vehicles, and recreation equipment, see
definitions in Section 23.302 (92), (92A), construction and
landscaping materials and equipment currently (within a period of
30 days) being used on the premises, off-street parking of
licensed and operative passenger automobiles and pick-up trucks.
Storage of recreational vehicles shall be subject to the
following:
Storage of recreation vehicles shall De co,qsidered either
transient or seasonal. Transient storage is defined as the
-~9- ~ 9-23-87
23.703
Appendix
placement of recreational vehicles for periods not exceeding
fourteen (14) consecutive days for a s@ecifi¢ purpose such
as active maintenance or short term living quarters for
visitors. Transient storage is permitted providing that it
.complies with all other sections of the Hound Code of Or-
dinances. Seasonal storage shall comply with all of the
provisions stated herein.
Recreational vehicles may be stored on private property in
yard areas consistent with the following setbacks:
Front yard - Front yard parking prohibited if over the
curb line or in such a manner as to block or impede.
the safe flow of traffic on the abutting roadway.
b. Side yard - Five (5) feet from the property line.
C. Rear yard - Five (5) feet from the property line.
Stored vehicles shall be currently r~gistered to, owned by,
leased to or rented to the owner or renter of the property.
4. Storage of recreational vehicles shall be limited to no more
than one (1) vehicle for every fifteen hundred (1500) square
feet of lot area up to a maximum of seven (7) vehicles.
Existing uses shall comply with this provision within twelve.'(12)
· .months following enactment of this Ordinance.
In all districts, t'he City may require a Conditional Use Permit
for any exterior storage if it is demonstrated that such storage
is a hazard to the public health, safety, convenience, morals, or
has a depreciating effect upon nearby .property values, or impairs
scenic.views, or constitutes threat to living amenities. (Ord. ~8
- 9-21-87)
Refuse
In all districts, all waste material, with the exception of debris, refuse,
or garbage shall be kept in an enclosed building or properly contalned in
a closed container designed for such pu[poses. The owner of vacant land
shall be responsible for keeping such land free of refuse. Existing uses
shall comply with this provision within slx months following enactment.of
thi's Ordinance.
Passenger vehicles and trucks in an inoperative state shall not be
parked in residential districts for a period exceeding ninety-six (96)
hours; inoperative shall mean incapable of movement under their own power
and in need of repairs or removal to junk yard. All exterior storage not
included as a permitted accessory use, a permitted use, or included as
part of a conditional use permit, or otherwise permitted by provisions of
this Ordinance shall be considered as refuse.
-50- 9-21-87
2~.7o~
23.705
23.706 .'
Appendix
Screenin~
Screening shal.1 be requlred In all resldentlal zones where (al any off-
street parktng area contains more than four (4) parklng spaces and is
within thirty (30) feet o~ an adjoln~ng resldentlal zone, and (bi where
the driveway to a parking area of more than six (6) parking spaces is
within fifteen (15) feet of an adioining residential use or zone.
Where any business (structure, parking or storage) is adjacent to
property zoned or developed for any residential use, that business or
industry shall provide screening along the boundary of the residential
property. Screening shall also be provided where a business, parking..
lot, or industry is across the street from a residential'zone, .but no{
on that side of a business or industry considered to be the front (as
determined .by the Building Inspector).
All exterior storage in cor~nercial districts shall be screened. The..
exceptions are: il) merchandise being displayed for sale; {2) materials
and equipment presently being used for construction on the premises;
(3) merchandise located on service station pump islands; all exterior
storage in commercial districts shall not impede traffic control and
must follow Section 23.7)4 of this Ordinance.
The screening required in this section may consist of a fence, trees,
,shrubs and berms not less than five {5) feet high but shall not extend
within fifteen (15) feet of any street or driveway. The screenln~ shall
.. be placed along.property lines or in case of screening along a street,
twenty (20) feet from the street right-of-way ~ith landscaping between
the screening and pavement. The screening shall not block direct vision.
Planting of a type approved by the City Council may also be required in
addition to or in lieu of fencing.
.Landscapin9 Halntenance
In all districts, all structures requiring landscaping and fences shall
be maintained so as not to be unsightly or present harmful health or~
safety conditions.
Glare
'in a11 districts, any lightlng used to illuminate an loll-street parking
area, sign, or other structure, shall be arranged so as to deflect light
away frcm any adjoining residential zone or from the publ)c streets.
Direct or sky-reflected glare, where from floodlights or from high-
temperature processes such as combustion or welding, shall not be directed
into any adjoining property. The source of lights shall be hooded or
controlled in some manner so as not to light adjacent property. Bare
incandescent light bulbs shall not be permitted in view of adjacent
property or public'right-of-way. Any light or combination of lights
which cast light on a public street shall not exceed one (l) foot candle
{meter reading) as measured from the centerl)ne of sald street. Any
light or combination of lights which cast light on residential property
shall not exceed 0.4 foot candles (meter readlng) as measured from sald
property line.
-$1 -
' -87a235'
Appendix B
.rmance Standard - Criterion established to control noise, odor,
,r noxious matter, vibration, fire or explosive hazards, or glare
.c generated by or inherent in used of land'or buildings.
,arming Commission - The Planning Commission of the City of Mound.
~) Principal Structure or Use - One which determines the predominant use
as contrasted to accessory use of structure.
Property Line - The legal boundaries of a parcel of property which may
also coincide with a right-of-way line of a road, cartway, and the like.
Protect.i. ve Covenant - A contract entered into between private parties
which constitutes a restrictlon of the use of a particular parcel of
property.
Public Lane - Land owned or operated by municipal, school district, county,
state or other governmental units.
Reach - A hydraulic engineering term ~o describe~a longltudlnal segment
of'a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In
an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive
bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach.
~ecreation, Publlc - Includes'ali uses such as tennls courts, ball fields,
plcnlc areas, and the llke that are commonly provided for the publlc at
parks, playgrounds, community centers, and other sites owned and o~erated
.iby a unit'of government for. the purpose of providing recreation.
Recreational"Equipment - Play apparatus such as swing sets and slides,
sandboxes, picnic tables, barbecue stands, and similar equipment or
structures but nat including tree houses, swimming pools, play houses
exceeding twenty-five {25} square feet .of..floor area, or sheds utilized
for storage of equipment. {ORD. #8 - 9-21-87)
{92A) Recreational Vehicles - Recreational vehicles shall include, but not.be
( limited to, boats, boat trailers, travel trailers, general purpose
trailers, self-containe.d motor homes, truck toppers,· fish houses,
utili.ty trailers, jet skis and snowmobiles. {ORD. #8 - 9-21-87)
(93) R~glstered Land Survey - A survey map of registered land designed to
simplify a complicated metes and bounds description, designating the same
into a tract or tracts of a Registered Land Survey Number. See Minnesota
Statutes,'508.47.
(94) Restaurants (Class I) - Traditional Restaurant food served and consumed
by customers while seated at a counter or table. Cafeteria - food
selected by customers while going through a serving line and taken to a
table for consumption. (ORD. 454. 12-6-83)
(95) Restaurants (Class II) - Fast Food, Convenience and Drive-In - restaurants
where a majority of customers order and are served their food at a counter
in packages prepared to leave the premises; or able to be taken to a table,
counter, or automobile, or off the premises to be consumed; or a .drive-in
where most customers consume their food in ar automobile regardless of how
it is served. (ORD. ~54. 12-6-83)
'9- 9-21-37
(87)
(89)
(9o)
(~l)
(92)
N~ound City Code
Section 800:10, Sub~. 7
can be made either by the bonding company or the applicant, without said person
first Eiving 30 days written notice to the City, addressed to the City Manager,
of intention to cancel bond.
Subd.-7. ~iabilit7 Insurance. Prior to the issuance of a liquor license, the
applicant shall demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to
liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.801 to the City Clerk and
to the Commissioner of Public Safety as a condition of the issuance or renewal
of his license. Proof of financial responsibility may be given by filing a
certificate that there is in effect an insurance policy or pool providing that
the ~i~t~m coverages for dram shop liability shall be a $300,000 combined~l~o,oo
single limit policy and an aggregate policy of not less than $300,000 per
policy year. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes Section 340A.409 relating to liability insurance policies. If a
liability insurance policy is made subject to all the conditions of a bond
under that statute, the policy may be accepted by the Council in lieu of the
bond required under Subd. 6. (Prior~issuance of a liquor license, the applicant
shall file a certificate that there is in effect an insurance policy providing
public liability coverages of at least $300,000 because of injury to any one
person in any one occurrence and $500,000 because of injury to two or
more persons in any one 6ccurrence.)
Subd. 8. Approval of Security. The security offered under Subds. 6 and 7
shall be approved by the City Council, and in the case of applicants for "On-Sale"
wine licenses, by the State Commissioner of Public Safety. Surety bonds and
.liability insurance policies shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney.
Operation of a licensed business without having on file with the City at'all
times effective security as required in Subds. 6 and 7 is a cause for re-
vocation of the license.
Section 800:15. License Fees.
Subd. 1. Fees. The annual fee for a Class A liquor license, Class B
liquor license, On-Sale Wine license, and Club license,.shall be as set
by the Council in Section 510: 25.
Subd. 2. Payment. Each application for a license shall be accompanied by
a receipt from the City Treasurer for payment of one-half of the license fee
and the fixed investigation fee required under Section 800:20, Subd. 1, if any.
The remaining balance of the license fee shall be paid before the license is
issued. The entire annual On-Sale license fee must be paid for the first
year's operation of a licensed establishment. In renewing the license, the
Council may allow the On-Sale licensee to pay the fee in two installments,
with one-half due on or before June 30th amd the balance due on or before
December 31st. Ail fees shall be paid into the general fund.
Subd. 3. Term, Pro Rata Fee. Each license shall be issued for a period
of one year except that if the application is made during the license
year, a license may be issued for the remainder of the year for a pro rata
fee, with any unexpired fraction of a month being counted as one month.
Every license shall expire on the last day of June of each year.
Subd. 4. Refunds. No refund of any fee shall be made except as
authorized by statute. If an application for a license is withdrawn
or rejected, the Treasurer shall refund the amount paid as the license
fee, except where rejection or withdrawal is a willful misstatement in
the license application.
34(}A.404) LLA~.I'I'.IT~]]~S~C~ . ..: :-
Subdivision L Insurance teqnlred. No ~et~ License ma~ be tssuext, maintained
or renewed unless the appticant demonstrates ;proof of fma~chl respons~illty with
re. rd to lhbtlity imposed .by section 340A.80L. Thc issuing authority must submit
to thc commi.~sioncr the applicant's proof of financial respon.vl~oilirY. This subdivision
does not prohibit a local unit of government from requiring highcr insurance or bond
coverages, or a larger deposit of cash or securities. The min~rnuln requirement forproof
of financial respons~ility may be given by ~
(1) a certificate that there is in effect for the licens~ pcriod an insuran~ policy or
pool providing at least $$0,000 of coverage because of bodily injury to any one person
i~ any one occurrence, $100,000 because ofboch~y injury to two or more persons in any
one occurrence. $10,000 because of injury to or desm~on of ~ of others in any
one occurrence, $50,000 for loss of mcans of support of any one person in any
occurrence, and $100,000 for loss of means of su~ort of two or more persons i~ any
one occun-ence; · - · -.
(2) a bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as provided in clause (1);'
or - ' .... : ~: '~
(3) a ccn/ficat¢ of the sure treasurer that the licens~ has deposi~ with the state'
trcasur~ $100,000 in cash or securities which may lc~ly be purchased.by
banks or for trust funds having a market value of $100,000. . ' .. . [ ....
· o ' o:L' . '. ' ; · .'
This subdivision does not prohibit an insult from providing the coverage req/fired~
by thi.~ subdivision in combination with othcr insurance co~cr~c. . . ..-..
An %nual ai/regatc policy limit for dram shop insurance of not less th~ .....
l~r policy ¥ca~. ma), be included in thc policy provision~ ....
A liabiliTM insurance policy required bi' this section must provide that it may noel'.
be canceled for.. . .......
(1) any cause, except for nonpayment of prcmb~m~ by cilhcr the insured or the:~
insurer unless thc canceling part~ has first ~ivcn 30 days' notice in writins to thc
_ authority of intent to cancel thc policy;, and pa~ ~
(2) nonpayment of premium unlcss the _~li,~g first/iron ten
notice in wfitini to thc issuint authority of intent to cancel the policy. · ·"
Subd. 2. ]VIarket assistance. The commi-.~-ioncr of commerce shall
llccnsees and municipalities subjcct to the finan~ responsibility requirements of
subdivision 1 of thosc pcrsons offcrin§ insur-anc~ coverage. Thc commi~ion~r of
commerce shall establish a pro/~m to assist licenses in ob~i~i~.~ '.insurance covcrage..
Thc pro,ram shall includc a con~,'rtee appointed by thc com..m,~'~oncr of
that is rcprescntati¥¢ of insurance carricrs and producers, liquor ~cndors, aha
public. No less than one-half of the commiViec members sh~ll represent castlal~.
insurcrs and surplus lines alents or brokers. Thc cornmi-~sioncr of commerce or
commissioner's desil~nated rcprcscntativc shall sa'vt as an ex officio member of
committee. Thc committee shall rc~icw and act upon ail propcrly executed a.p~pslih~.
lions. If thc commlttee finds that it cannot assist in scctu/ng insurance covcraEe, it s
notify thc applicant in writinl~ with a full exp!~,~stion and recommendation for
lng its ability to secure insurance. Thc commissioner ofcommcl'CC sh:~ll~ if ncce~ll~,~
establish an assi~ncd risk plan pursuant to sutxtivision 3. , '
R.L. Youngdahl & Assoda es, Inc.
1~2OB MINNETONKA E~LYD. * MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 - (612) 933-7,488
July 8, 1986
City of Mound
Attention: Mr. Ed Shukle
Mound, MN
Dear Ed,
At the last Council"meeting the Council asked myself and the City Attorney
to find any evidence that would show that the State Statutory minimum
Dram Shop Liability limit of $50,000/$100,000/$10,000/$50,000/$100,000
was too low.
These are the results of my attempt to find evidence indicating whether
or not the State's minimum limits are too low. I talked to ~. David Gorum
at the Insurance Commissioner's office in-St. Paul and he informs me that
ther~ are no records kept in his office that would indicate the dollar
amount of settlements in Dram Shop Liability Suits. Due to the fact that
he has no records of the settlements of the~e suits,~he Offers no opinion
as to what limits would be adequate.
I talked to a Ms. Debbie Woodard at the John H. Crowther Insurance Brokerage
Firm. This Brokerage Firm is the main writer of Dram Shop Liability Insurance
in Minnesota. Ms. Woodard had mentioned that they in their office once again
do not have a record as to what the dollar amount of the Dram Shop settlements
are. She did mention that many of the claims are settled out of court and
thusly, no records are available. She recommended that the only possible
way of getting specific information would be to find specific cases and then
contact the Claims Departm-e~t~_ of the various involved insurance companies.
This process would take many weeks though investigating.
I talked to the office of the Mothers Against Drunk Drivers and was informed
that they have no information at all as to the amounts of insurance that should
be required in Dram Shop cases or that they would recommend be carried in
Dram Shop cases. They felt that the--area of insurance was somethinR that was
totally out of their realm.
I talked to Don Riley from the Professional Insurance ~Ments Association of
Minnesota he also stated that to his knowledge there are no records kept as
to the amount of settlement in general on Dram Shop Liability cases. Once
again, many of the claims are settled out of court and in private thusly, the
knowledge is private and not for public record. He pointed out another issue
and that was that insurance companies as a matter of practice do not publish.
or make available the records of claim settlements. He advised that it would
be almost impossible to get claims records out of an insurance company regarding
the general issue of Dram Shop Liability.
- 2 -
I also talked to several attorneys, all of whom asked to leave their name
as anonymous. One of the attorneys was a plaintiff attorney, another
attorney was an insurance company attorney, and another attorney was a
defense attorney. Ail of the attorneys seemed to agree that businesses
should carry the highest limit of Liability insurance that they can afford
to pay. It was pointed out that if there is not adequate insurance avail-
able, it will not stop an attorney from suing for more than the amount of
insurance that is being carried. It was pointed out that if somebody is
legitimately injured for the rest of their life, then the attorney will sue
for whatever he believes to be a proper amount of settlement for the negli-
gence that caused the accident.
In summary, it appears that several facts are apparent. Firstly, insurance
companies do not like to make public, the amount of the settlements in
insurance claims. This makes it very difficult for anybody to come up with
a logical dollar amount to put as an average settlement amount of claims.
We just don't have available, minimUms and maximums of these settlements.
SecOndly, if somebody is legitimately injured in a claim, the sky is the
limit as to the amount that a negligent party is going to be sued for.
It appears to be a question of just how much is enough. I do know that the
insurance policies that are being written on this Dram Shop Liability currently
all carry an aggregate amount...meaning that the amount of coverage being written
is all that is available for the policy. Which is usually for a 12 month period.
If an insured has a policy limit of $50,000 per person for bodily injury and
$100,000 for all of the people involved in an accident for bodily injury, then
the policy is saying that that is all the coverage available for a 12 month
period, whether those amounts are used up in one claim, or two or more claims.
In talking to insurance company people, their attitude is not to take a stand
on the amount of coverage, or the type of coverage that a person should be
carrying. Their stance is to simply offer whatever limits that a City Council
requires. They leave the decisions both up to the individual cities and to the
individual insureds, without making a preference one way or the other. So it
appears to boil down to a city's comfort level as to what they feel is a
minimum amount of Dram Shop Liability insuranc~ that the insureds, in their
individual city, should carry to prove their financial responsibility for
.their citizens.
After reviewing all of the above information, I still contend that a $300,000
Combined Single Limit of Liability insurance should be a minimum requirement
of the city for its two on sale liquor vendors.
I hope that the information I have provided will help the Council in making
this difficult decision.
Respectfully,
Earl E. Bailey
EEB/bk
R. L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOC., INC.
I! 520~ MINNETONKA BOULEVARD · MINNETONKA MINNESOTA
June 19, 1986
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Attention: Mr. Ed Shukle
Dear Ed,
I am writing you in response to the two insurance related issues
that you asked me to review and state my recommendations om. The first
issue being about the City of Mound requiring all on sale liquor license
applicants to carry a specified minimum amount of public liability insurance.
The second issue being the City's requiring these same liquor license
applicants to carry a specified minimum amount of liquor liability (dram
shop) insurance.
First, a city requirement of public liability. After talking to many
insurance people and municipalities I find that the city of Mound is one
of the few cities in Minnesota to have a public liability requirement
as a prerequisite to obtaining an on sale liquor license. ~Ione of our
surrounding communities do, nor can I fSnd one of similar population
to Mound that does.
But that does not necessarily mean that Mound should eliminate their
requirements. Although you should look closely at it. Carrying
public liability insurance, or any insurance, is certainly one means
of proving financial responsibility. The question is though, should
the city control the basic insurance coverages, or other business .activ~ie§,
of a restaurant, or a hardware store, or a bank, or any other main
street business? The "public liability" insurance that we are addressing
here covers the basic, general activities involved in running a business,
any business. It doesn't cover out of the ordinary or hazardous activities,
in fact it excludes them.
That is why a special policy like a dram shop policy is necessary. It
addresses the special exposure or dangers of intoxicating people. This
special exposure to the public is probably why cities control the
exposure and issue licenses to a select few. Stringent requirements
of the dram activity should be made without a doubt, but controls over
the basic restaurant operation I question.
If the City council should decide to continue with making a minimum
requirement for public liability as a prerequisite for a liquor license,
then I think you should consider a minimum of g500,000 combined single
limit per occurrence for Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability with
an aggregate of $500,000 combined single limit.
-2-
The City does not own, nor is it running the activity of these two
restaurants that are applying for liquor, so I don't see the need to require
the city oriented $200,000/$600,000 split limits that the state refers
to as a city's limit for immunity. .?his $500,000 limit is a reasonable
limit and is readily available to the two restaurants concerned. Higher
limits are available, but might cause financial hardships due to the
high premiums being charged restaurants in 1986.
A lower limit of $300,000 is the absolute minimum that you may want to
consider. The price difference between $300,000 and $500,000 is only
about 20%. In lieu of the price difference and the current trend of high
court settlements, I do not recommend this lower limit.
Secondly, the city requirement of a minimum limit of liability for ~iquor
liability (dram shop) insurance. Once again I have contacted many varied
people to get various angles of thinking about this topic. Apparently,
most cities are requiring minimum limits around $300,000. .While a few
are requiring $500,000 limits and an even rarer few are requiring the
state mandated minimum of $50,000/$100,000.
There are only three "active" writers of liquor liability in .Minnesota.
One of those is the "Risk Pool." The other two are Transcontinental
Insurance Company and St. Paul Company, with St. Paul Company being
very restrictive. Here is a sample of Transcontinental's premiums per $100
of liquor receipts:
50/100/10/50/100,000 h$~ $2.00/$f00
300/300/300/300/300,000 ~,?0 $4.90/$100
500/500/500/500/500,000 $7.90/$100
We are dealing with only two on sale liquor license applicants, and both
of these have liquor liability insuranCe readily available to them at
whatever limit the Council selects. Because of this, I think the state
minimum of $50,000/$100,000 is way too low. I recommend that the Council
consider as the minimum limits, $300,000 combined single limit for
Bodily Injury each person and each occurrence, Property Damage, and
Loss of Means of Support for each person and each occurrence, and
$300,000 Aggregate.
When you look back at the price difference'between the $300,000 and
$500,000 limit of liability you will see about a $2,100 premium
difference for each $100,000 of liquor sales. In other words, for
$300,000 of liablity coverage and $100,000 in sales, the premium
would be $4,900. While $500,000 of liability and $100,000 in sales
would be a premium would be a premium of $7,000. A $2,100 difference.
If liquor sales were $300,000 instead of $100,000 then the $2,100 difference
would become a $6,300 difference. Thusly, I believe the $300,000 liability
limit to be a reasonably acceptable minimum requirement for these times
and this geographic and demographic loCation. If the license applicants
wish to carry higher limits than this minimum then they are certainly
welcome to do so.
Thank you Ed for the opportunity to review these matters. I hone this
input is beneficial.
Respectfully,
Earl E. Bai%ey
lemgue of m nnesotm oities
June 13, 1986
Steve Keiiior
City Clerk
P.O. Box 245
Askov, !~N 55704
Dear i-~r. Keiilor:
The range of Dram Shop liability limits set by Minnesota cities
vary according to the size and location of the city and the"
cities ability to regulate the liquor establishments. In
revf~wing municipal liquor ordinances that the League has on file
tne follo~ing liability limits are being used by cities in
F~in~esota.
Number of Cities
Liability Limits
44
State minimum requirements
50,000 / 100,O00
3
100,000 / 200,000
24
100,000 / 300,000
250,000 / 500,000
While the majority of the cities requiring more t~an t~e minimum
state requirements were in the metropolitan area, there are
several cities, such as House Lake, whic~ are locateo near Askov
which have higher limits. ~
Underwriters with Columbia Casualty (John H. Crowtner Co.) ~o not
keep this kind of statistic, however, their sense of the market
as of April 1986 is that most licensees are buying 100,000 /
300,000. EBA company, which administers the state assigned risk
plan will only write for the statutory minimums, unless the city
has an orminance in place requiring a higher amount.
Again, the ultimate decision on the appropriate limits of
liability to require of licensees rest~in the sound discretion of
the city council. I hope this answers your question
satisfactorily.
Amount
of
Dram
Shop Insurance Actually CarrieO
Metropolitan Municipalities
by Selecte~
360B1A
'340C10
April 1986
City
Does City Require
l'.~ore than the
Statutory Minimum
Eden Prairie
N
Cl]aska
Cnanhassen
Burnsville
Y - Require 100-300
Y - Require 100-300
P0,000 property
Plymouth' N
Eagan N
Shakopee
Y - Require 100-300
Do Lieencees
Insure Above
the Required
Amount
Y 500,000 common
N
Some, e.g.dinner
theater: 500,000
N
Y some $1 million
umbrella covg.
Underwriters with Columbia Casualty (John H. Crowther Co.) do not
keep this kind of statistic, however, their sense of the market is
that most licensees are buying 100-300. EBA Company, which
a~ministers the state assigned risk plan will only write for the
statutory minimums, UNLESS the city has an ordinance in place
requiring a higher amount./
Telephone Survey -
April 1986
jmb
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO ERECT
NO P/%RKIN~ /~NYTIME ~I~N~ ON ~ PORTION OF
COUNTY ROAD 110
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize Hennepin County to erect
"No Parking Any Time" signs on both sides of the County Road 110
from County Road 125 to the widened area approximately 300 feet
west of Highland Blvd.
TO=
FROM~
D~TE=
SUBJECT=
Fran Clark, City Clerk
Len Harrell, Chief of Police
June 28, 1989
Resolution for Hennepin County to Change parking signs
on Cty. Rd. 110 between Cty. Rd. 125 & 300 feet west of
Highland Blvd.
I have spoken to Martin Luebke in reference to some no parking
signs posted across from Mound Bay Park. There needs to be an
additional sign erected plus the no parking should continue
around the curve approximately 300 feet west of Highland Blvd.
The resolution should authorize the county to erect "No Parking
Any Time" signs from Cty. Rd. 125 to the widened area ap-
proximately 300 feet west of Highland Blvd.
July 11, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY FL~NAGER
TO SIGN A CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
FOR A TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM -
CSAH 110 AT CSAH 15 (NORTH JUNCTION)
(COMMERCE BLVD. AND LYNWOOD BLVD.)
WHEREAS, it is considered mutually desirable to install
a traffic control signal system with interconnect at the inter-
section of County State Aid Highway No. 15 (north junction) with
county State Aid Highway 110 within the City of Mound; and
WHEREAS, the City requested the project be constructed
in 1989; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to participate in the con-
struction and operating cost of said signal; and
WHEREAS, said work is to be carried out by the City of
Mound and Hennepin County under the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes Section 162.61, Subd. 1, and Section 471.59.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the Mayor and
city Manager to sign an Agreement for Participation in the Con-
struction and Operation of Traffic Control Signal System
(Agreement #19-06-89), County Project No. 8926. Said signal sys-
tem to be installed at CSAH 110 at CSAH 15 (north junction), Com-
merce Blvd. and Lynwood Blvd.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering Division
320 Washington Ave. South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468
Phone: [6'12] 935-338
June 22, 1989
JUN 2 6 1989
Mr. Edward 3. Shukle, Jr.
City Manager
City of Mound
534i Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
CSAH 110 AT CSAH 15 ('NORTH JUNCTION)
COUNTY PROJECT 8926
Dear Mr. Shukle'
Submitted herewith for City approval are two copies
of the Construction Cooperative Agreement for the
above referenced project.
If the agreement is satisfactory, please present it
to the city council for approval. Upon approval,
please have both copies signed by the appropriate
city officials and return these copies to Hennepin
County. In addition, please return two certified
copies of the resolution authorizing the mayor and
manager to sign the agreement.
If you have any questions concerning this agree-
ment, please call Jerry Mortenson-at 935-3381,
extension 325.
Design Engineer
3GM:mak
Enclosure
HENNEPIN COUNTY
j~, j~, ~ & on equol oppo~unMy employer
County Project No.
County State Aid Highway No.
~ty of Mound
County of Hennepln
AGREEMENT
FOR
PARTICIPATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of ,'19__, by
and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the
State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Mound, a
body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter
referred to as the "City".
WItNESSETH:
WHEREAS, It is considered mutually desirable to install a traffic control signal
system with interconnect at the intersection of County State Aid highway No. 15 (north
junction} with County State Aid Highway 110 within the City limits; and
WHEREAS, The City has requested the project be constructed in 1989; and
· . WHEREAS, The City has expressed willingness to participate in the construction
and operating cost of said signal; and
· ' WHEREAS, It is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto
under the provisions of M.S. SEC. 162.61, Subd. 1 and SEC. 471.59.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED'
-1-
Agreement No. PW 19-06-89
The County will have the project designed by a consultant due to limited County
staff, advertise for bids for the work and construction of the aforesaid Project No.
8926, receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement and enter into a contract
with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder
according to law in such case provided for counties. The Contract will be in form and
will include the plans and specifications prepared by the County or its agents, which
said plans and specifications are by this reference made a part hereof.
II
The County will administer the Contract and inspect the construction of the
contract,work contemplated herewith. 'HoWever, the City Engineer of Mound shall
cooperate with the County Engineer and his staff at their request to the extent
necessary, but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the work.
The City agrees that any City license required to perform electrical work within
the City shall be issued at no cost. Electrical inspection fees shall be not more
than those established by the State Board of Electricity in the most recently recorded
Electrical Inspection Fee Schedule.
IV
The City shall install, or cause the installation of an adequate three wire,
120/240 volt, single phase, alternating current electrical power connection to the
controller cabinet at its own sole cost and expense. The City shall also provide the
electrical energy for the operation of the traffic control signal to be installed at
its own sole cost and expense.
Agreement No. PW 19-06-89
V
The City shall reimburse the County for fifty (50) percent of the construction
cost of the contract work for said project.
The estimate of the total cost for contract work for the project is Eighty
Thousand Dollars and No Cents {$80,000.00}. It is further agreed that this estimate
is an estimate of the construction cost for the contract work on said project and that
the unit prices set forth in the Contract with the successful bidder and the final
quantities as measured by the City Engineer shall govern in computing the total final
contract construction cost for apportioning the cost of said project according to the
provisions of this paragraph.
In addition to payment of the City's proportionate share of the contract
construction cost, the City also agrees to pay to the County a sum equal to fourteen
percent (14%) of the City's share for traffic signal and interconnect construction, it
being understood that said additional payment by the City is its proportionate share
of all engineering cost incurred by the County in connection with the work performed
under this contract.
VII
Within sixty (60) days after an award by the County to the successful bidder,
the City shall deposit with the Hennepin County Treasurer, ninety percent (90%) of the
estimated City share in the contract construction and engineering costs for the
project. Said estimated City share shall be based on actual contract unit prices for
estimated quantities shown in the'plans.
-3-
Agreement No. P~ 19-06-89
The remaining ten percent (10%) is to be paid to the County upon the completion
of the project and submittal to the City of the County Engineer's Final Estimate for
the project showing the City's final share in the contract construction and
engineering costs for the project.
Upon payment of the Final Estimate to the successful bidder by Hennepin County,
any amount remaining, as a balance in bhe deposit account will be returned to the City;
likewise any amount due the County by the City upon payment of the Final Estimate by
the County shall then be paid by the City as its final payment for the construction
and engineering cost of this project.
The County Engineer will prepare monthly progress reports as provided in the
specifications. A copy of these reports will be furnished to the City upon request.
IX
All records kept by the City and the County with respect to this project shall
be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto.
X
The City shall not revise by addition or deletion, nor alter or adjust any
· component, part, sequence, or timing of the aforesaid traffic control signal; however,
nothing herein shall be construed as restraint of prompt, prudent action by properly
constituted authorities in situations where a part of such traffic control signal may
be directly involved in an emergency.
-4-
Agreement No. PW 19-06-89
×I
Upon completion of the work, the County shall maintain and repair said traffic
control signal at the sole cost and expense of the County. Further, the County, at
its expense, shall maintain IlO volt power to the line side of the fuse in the base of
the signal poles for the integral street lights. The City, at its expense, shall
maintain the fuse, the luminaire and the wire to the load side of the fuse in the base
Of the signal poles for the system.
XII
The County and the City shall, upon completion of the work, remove the
pedestrian crosswalk, crosswalk striping and pedestrian crossing signs located mid
block on CSAH 110 between the no.rth and south junction of CSAH 15.
It is further agreed that the County shall not be responsible or liable to the
City or to any other person or persons whomsoever for claims, damages, action, or
cause of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the
performance of any work or part hereof by the City as provided for herein; and the
City further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding
commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in
connection with or by virtue of performance hereunder by the City.
It is further agreed that the City shall not be responsible or liable to the
County or to any other person or persons whomsoever for claims, damages, action, or
cause of action of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the
performance of any work or part hereof by the County as provided for herein; and the
County further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding
Agreement No. PW 19-06-89
commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising tn
connection with or by virtue of performance hereunder by the County.
XIV
It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other
persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or
provided herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the
County, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's
Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on
behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third
parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so
engaged ~? any of the work or service~'provided ~o be rendered herein shall in no way
be the obligation or responsibility of the County.
Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the
County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to
be performed by the'County shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any
and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the
Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees
while.so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of
any act or omission on the part of said employees While so engaged on any of the work
or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or
responsibility of the City.
XV
The provisions of M. S. 181.59 and:of any applicable local ordinance relating
civil rights and discrimination and the affirmative action policy statement of
-6-
Agreement No. PW 19-06-89
Hennepin CountF shall be considered a part of this agreement as though fully set forth
herein.
In accordance with Hennepin County Affirmative Action Policy and the County
Commissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall be excluded from full
employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service or
activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital
status, affectional/sexual preference, public assistance status, ex-offender status,
or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws
against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination.
-7-
Agreement No. PW 19-06-89
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first
above written.
CITY OF MOUND
(Seml) By:
Mayor
Date'
And:
Manager
Date'
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
ATTEST:
Clerk of the County Board
Date:
By'
Chairman of its County Board
Date'
Upon~oper execution, this agreement
wtl~legally valid~d b?~ng.
By: ~~ ~
Date:. ~ ./O~ ~C/
And:
Associate County Administrator
and County Engineer
Date:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Approved as to execution
By:
Assistant County Attorney
Date'
By'
Director, Department of Public Works
Date:
RESOLUTION 89-
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
CASE NO. eg- a
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
TO ALLOW A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOt 4, BLOCK 3,
SHADYWOOD POINt; PID #13-117-24-11 0135
(1766 SHOREWOOD LANE); PEZ CASE #89-824
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a
two story addition containing a two car garage anO living space
to the existing principal structure within one (1) foot of the
front property line for Lot 4, Block 3, Shadywood Point; PID #12-
117-24-11 0135; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R-2 Single
Family Zoning District according to the Mound Code of Ordinances,
Which requires a 20 foot front yard setback; and
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) of the Mound Code
of Ordinances provides that alterations may be made to a building
containing a lawful nonconforming use which will improve the
livability thereof; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and
found that the one story garage should be approved within one (Il
Foot of the front lot line because no feasible alternative for a
garage exists on the lot due to the width of the parcel; and
WHEREAS, 'the Planning Commission reviewed the request for
second story living quarters above the garage within three (3)
Feet of the front lot line and found that such construction would
alleviate undue hardship due to practical difficulty.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
That the City does hereby authorize the applicant's request
to construct a garage and.entry area on the First floor
within one (1) foot of the front lot line (19 Foot variance)
for the property at 1766 Shorewood Lane; PID #t3-117-24-11
0135.
That the City does hereby approve the request for a 17 foot
variance to construct second story living quarters above the
first floor construction referenced in item #! above due to
the Finding that strict interpretation of the Mound Zoning
Code would impose practical'difficulty upon the applicant.
PROPOSED RESOLUT!ON
Page Two
CASE NO. 89-824
The City Council authorizes the structural setback violation
and authorizes the alterations set Forth below, pursuant to
Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) of the Mound Code of Or-
dinances with the clear and express understanding that the
use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all
of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
It is determined that the residential unit will be improved
to afford the owner reasonable use of his property by
authorizing the construction of a First Floor garage and
entry area within one (1) Foot of the front property line
and 2nd floor living quarters within three (3) feet of the
Front property line.
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property: Lot 4, Block 3, Shadywood Point, PID
11 0135.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder
.with the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin CoUnty pursuant to
Minnesota State Statutes, Section 462.3595, Subdivision (4).
This shall be considered as a restriction on how this
property may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility for filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs
For such recording· The building permit shall not be issued
until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 10, 1989
be
Case No. 89-824: Daniel dohnson~ 1766 Shorewood Lane,
5hadywood Point, Block 37 Lot 4; PID #13-117-24-11 0135.
VARIANCE= Front Yard Setback.
The City Planner reviewed the history of the case. At the Plan-
ning Commission meeting of June 12, 1989 the garage addition was
approved with a 19 Foot front yard variance, however, construc-
tion of the second story addition was denied since other alterna-
tives For the construction of additional )iving space exists.
The City Planner further explained that the applicant has revised
his plans, however, staff recommendati.on remains For approval of
a 19 Foot Front yard variance For construction o¢ a new garage
and entry area, and denial of the second story construction
within the 20 Foot required setback area.
Applicant, Dan Johnson, reviewed the revised plans with the Com-
mission. He explained that he has changed the roof line result-
ing in a 5' cantilever, with a 4' high wall. The second story
addition will begin 2 Feet back From the Front of the garage,
therefore will be 3 feet from the Front property line, and
feet From the curb.
Cheryl Johnson stated that she has talked to three of her neigh-
bors about the possibility of adding onto the lakeshore side of
their home. She stated that their neighbors say this will block
their view and they do not want them to add onto the lakeshore
side..
Sohns suggested a compromise to allow construction of a s~cond
story addition within 20 Feet of the curb., therefore i2 Feet From
the Front property line. Clapsaddle commented that if we would
allow them to build t2 Feet from the property line, then why not
allow a 3 foot variance. Andersen stated that he agrees with
Clapsaddle, and added that he does not Feel it is possible to
build on the lakeshore side of the home, therefore a variance
should be granted.
MOTION made by Andersen, seconded by Michael to approve
a 19 Foot Front yard variance to construct a two car
garage, and a 17 Foot Front yard variance to allow con-
struction of a second stop addition as proposed by the
applicant.
Th~ Commission discussed the possibility of the existence of a
hardship. Jansen commented that due to the existing structure
and the impracticability of adding onto the lakeshore side of the
home due to the vaulted-ceilings and building into the visual
amenity of the neighbors, that a practical difficulty exists.
MOT!ON carried 4 - 3,
sen, Thal, Clapsaddle.'
Meyer.
Those in Favor:
Those opposed:
Andersen, Jen-
Michael, Sohns,
Planning Commission Minutes
June 12, 1989
Page Five
Elsa Watson, applicant, explained that she has contacted McCombs
Frank Rods who had staked out their lot in order to Improve
Tuxedo Blvd. in front of their home, and they will be sending her
a survey of her lot. Mrs. Watson asked if this would be a suffi-
cient survey. The City Planner informed Mrs. Watson that the
survey needs to pass the building inspector's approval prior to
permit issuance.
MOTION made by Thai, seconded by Clapsacidle to approve
s~fF recon~nenclatton for approval of a t2 foot rear yard
variance and a 3 foot rear yard variance at 4610 Tuxedo
Blvd. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on June 27, 1989.
e. Case No. 89-824: Dante1 dohnsont lTGG Shorewood Lanet
Shadywood Point? Block 37 Lot 41 PID #13-ll7-24-11-0135.
VARIANCE: Front Yard Setback Variance.
The City Planner reviewed the applicants request for a 19 foot
front yard variance to construct a two car garage and second
floor living space addition. Koegler stated that he feels place-
ment of the garage in the rear yard is Impractical due to limited
space to the side lot lines. However, there is room for a living
space addition on the lakeside of the home.
Staff recommended approval of a 19 foot ~front yard variance for
the construction of a new garage and entry area on the first
floor of the home. Second story construction within the 20 foot
required setback area is specifically prohibited since other al-
ternatives for the construction of addi'tional living space exist.
Dan Johnson, applicant, submitted pictures to the Commission
showing some of his neighbors garages, and how close to the curb
they sit. Mr. Johnson further explained the need for the second
story addition. He stated that the home has no basement, and the
lakeside portion of the home has vaulted ceilings. He does not
want to add onto the lakeside .of the home because it would
de~troy the view from the living area.
The Commission explained to Mr. Johnson the need to be consistent
with their decision pertaining to second story additions being so
close to the front property line.
MOT[ON made by Sohns, seconded by Andersen to accept
staff recommendation for approval of a 19 foot front
yard variance for the construction of a garage and entry
way. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the Ctty Counctl on June 27, 1989.
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FRON: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: June 5, 1989
SUBJECT: Variance (Front yard setback)
APPLICANT: Daniel P. Johnson
LOCATION: 1766 Shorewood Lane
CASE NUHBER: 89-~24
VNS FILE NUNBER: 89-310-A19-ZO
EXISTING ZONING: R-2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking approval of a 19 foot front
yard variance to construct a two car garage and second floor living
space addition. The existing home sits approximately 24 feet back
from the front yard property line. Proposed improvement plans call
for construction of a garage and entry area on the first floor and
a new bedroom on the second floor between the existing front of the
home and the front property line. Upon completion, the addition
to the home will be I foot from the front property line.
The subject property is a lakeshore lot with limited side yard
areas (6 feet and 9.6 feet). In the application, Mr. Johnson notes
that the "existing setbacks do .not allow wide enough driveway
ac.cess for (the) garage to be on (the) lakeside." Because of the
limited side yard areas, staff feels that placement of the garage
in the rear yard is impractical and would result in a single car
width driveway abutting the south lot line. Because of this
situation, approval of a front yard variance for the garage seems
to be warranted in this case. Properties approximately one block
north of this site have garages very close to Shorewood Lane.
According to City Code, requested variances are to be "the minimum
variance which would alleviate the hardship." This section of the
ordinance impacts both the proposed garage and the second floor
living space that is proposed to be constructed above it.
3030 Harbor Lane North Bldg.ll, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 55447-2175 612/553-1950
Regarding the garage, the applicant is proposing the construction
of a structure to house two vehicles. The proposed garage is 24
feet in width resulting in the I foot front setback. A 22 foot
wide garage will accommodate two vehicles but would reduce the
required variance to 17 feet.
The existing home presently has a rear yard setback of
approximately 78 feet from Lake Minnetonka. The City and the LMCD
require a 50 foot lakeshore setback for the principal structure.
Construction of additional living space at the rear of the home is
possible in conformance with the City's setback requirements.
Past actions by the Planning Commission and City Council have
recognized the need to allow variances for the construction of
garages when no feasible alternatives exist. Garages have been
found to be normal and customary parts of residential structures.
In all cases, the City has not allowed construction of living space
within one foot of a property line when feasible alternatives
exist, particularly when the construction will be two stories in
height.
R£COMB£NDATION: Staff recommends approval of a 19 foot front yard
variance for the construction of a new garage and entry area on the
first floor of the home. Second story construction within the 20
foot required setback area is specifically prohibited since other
alternatives for the construction of additional living space exist.
OF HOUND
PART II
Fee $50.00
VARIANCE APPLICATION
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
(Please type or print the following information.)
Address ot= Subject Property /~. -~orcw4~e~
Lot ~
Owner's Name ~n~
Owner's Address
Applicant's Name (i1= other than owner)
Address
Block
PID No. /3-'//7-
Day Phone
Day Phone
isting.Use of Property:
Zoning District ~_
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? yes /~ I1= yes,
list Date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
I certify that al'l of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose
of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may
be required by law.
IIII!11111111111111111111111111111~t~111111/11111111111/111111111~11//~11111
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
.Planning Commission Recommendation
Date
ouncil Action:
Resolution No.
Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Does the present use oF the property conform to all regulations for
the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ~), No ( ). IF no,
specify each non-conforming use:
e
Do the existing structures comply with ali area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations For the Zoning district in which it is located?
Yes ~(), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use For any.of the uses permitted in that zonl'ng
distr!ct?
too narrow (~) topography ( ) soil
too small ( ). drainage ( ) sub-surface
tcx~ shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone
having property lntereEts~ in the land after the zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes (), No ~. If yes, explain
Wa~ the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ~. If yes, explain
IANCE APPLICATION
Case No.,
Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance
peculiar on]y to th~ property described in this petition? Yes
No ( ). If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?.
What is ~he "m~n~mum" modification (variance) from ~he area, bulk, and
setback ~egu]a~ions ~ha~ ~i ~ } pe~mi~ you ~o m~ke ~easonab]e use
your land~ (Specify, using maps, si~e plans ~i~h dimensions and
~en exp]ana~ ion.
Wli 1 g~n~lng of the variance De m~terJ~! ly ~e:rimen~i' ~o p~opecty
the same zone, or to the enforcement of this
PART I I I
SITE PLAN INFORMATION: All supporting documents such as sketch planst
attachmentst etc.~ must be submitted in 8-1/2"x11" size. If larger
drawtnqs are submitted~ one must be 8-1/2"xll"t and 15 larger size
~opies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site.plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show-
ing the following information:
Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s), driveway(s)/street access, off-street parking, and
utilities.
Existing and proposed elevations.
Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines;
principal building and accessory buildings; principal buil0ing
and principal buildings on adjacent lots.
Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
Indicate "north" compass direction.
Any additional information as may reasonably be required 'by the
city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance·
BILLS ..... JULY 11, 1989
BATCH 9063
BATCH 9064
Lutz Tree Serv Demolish
Joel Krumm Mileage
Finch
Ln
145,162.76
104,191.65
4,135.O0
7.15
Unitog Uniform rental
I.P. Skelly Auto repairs
TOTAL BILLS
253,496.56
444.37
501.85
254,442.78
i>
.')
I"~Jb 1
AP-C02-01
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HCLD
NO. INVOICE ~BR ~TE DATE STATL~
B0547 M~E-PAID
&/30/89 6/30/~
Ba/~Y CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL
B0580 PRE-PAID
61301~ 613O189
BILL CLARK OIL COlt°ANY VENDOR TOTAL
CIO01 PRE-PIIO
8/30/8~ $/30/89
CO~I99IONE~ OF REVENUE VENDO~ TOTAL
DI 153 t tf-PlID
6/30/8~ 6/30/89
B'VINCI'~ PIllA VENDOR TOTAL
1)1217 PRE-P~IB
6/3O/89 ~/30/89
DS_BERT ~ VEHIX~ TOTAL
I)1340 -' P~-P~IO
~/30/8~ 6/30/89
~IVER & VEHICLE 9ER"VI~ VENI~ TOTAL
PRE-PAIB
6/30~8~
PRE-PAID
6/9O/89 6/:)0/89
ED ~ILLI~ & ~ VENDOR TOTAL
F1625 PRE-PAID
6/30/89 613O189
FI~T HING~TA ~qEN)X~R TOTAL-
F-f(E-PAID
6/~/~ 6/3O/89
~REAT WEST UFE ASSURANC~ V~X~OR TOTAL
PRE-PAII~
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF ~
Ai'IDUNT DESCRIPTION
761.33 LIQ
761.33 JU~.-CD
761
90~.83 GASOLI)E
~06.~ J=U4_-CD
2.~9.14. SIT 6/24 PR
2,~9.14 J~NL-CD
47.00 PIZZA-CO~Q'ilI')IEE DF ~
47.00 dRNL-CD
250.80 ~5.5 CONll~JqCT
19.3~ MILEAGE
270.16 JR~.-CD
270.16
6.00 PLATES-B7 PONTIAC
6.00 dRI~.-CD
151.13 LIQ
338.~ WIG
6.40- DISC
483.72 dIU~.-CD
1~.~ LIQ
407.15 WIG
6.77- OISC
535.96
1019.68
1,369.00 DEF CDf'P 6/24 PR
1,363.00. JRIi.-CD
136,3.00
367.89 LIQ
10~.~ MIX
9.44- DISC
71-7100-~I0
1010
01-1250-0000
I010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-~-2200
I010
81-4350-3100
81-4350-9940
1010
22-4170-4100
I010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-95~0
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-~'~0
1010
84-I090-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9540
71-7100-I~o60
PiCE-PAID
AMOUNT
761.33
3359.14
270.16
5C~.96
2~b-'73
2P578
PAGE 2
~-C02-01
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MDUNI)
613018~ 613018~ 467,24
PRE-PAID
6f30/89 6/30189
GRIGGS CDOFFJ~ & COMPANY VE~I~ TOTAL
G1975 PRE-PAID
6/3O/89 6/3O189
GTE/~UN ~IML~ilTY DIRECTOe VE]ql)OR TOTAL
H~28 PRE-PAIl)
6/3O/89 6/3O/8"9
HARgRIVE'S UEN1)DR TOTAL
I2301 PRE-PAIl)
6/.30/89 6/30189
ICMA REI~IRE]'ENT TRUST-4b-7 VENgOR TOTAL
12304 ~ PRE-PAIl)
6/30/89 6/30/89
ICMA RE'[IRE]~_~4T ~-401 VENI~3R TOTAL
I2350 PRE-PAID
6/3O/89 6/30/BI
INI'E~ ASS~ FIRE CHIEFS VENDOR TDTAL
J2571 PRE-PAID
6/3O/89 6/3O/89
JOHN TAFFE VF. NI)OR TOTAL
J2579 PRE-PAIl)
6/3O/89 6/30/B9
PRE-PAID
6/3O/89 6/3O/89
~ BROS WHOLESALE LI*VE]~TDTAL
1_2840 PRE-PAIB
6/3O/~ 6/3O/89
DE~O~IPTI~
FRT
dl~ -CD
~.~ MIX
1.bS- DISC
2,~ FRT
P.A.S2 ~NL-CD
551.76
274.32' ~IN DIRECTORY ADV-PPD
274.32 ,.RbE.-CD
274.32
9,500.00 NORWOOD/BARTLT STORM SEWER
9,5(X).00
9500. O0
478.18 ~ CO~lu 6/24 ~
478.18 JUtL-CD
478.18
87.25 IC)~A 401 6/24
87.~
87.25
160.00 ~GI'Sll~- I~C
160.00 dRNL-CD
160.00
520.00 8O CONTRACT
520.00
520.00
372.79 LIQ
1,586.87 WINE
24.~- DISC
1,935.34 dRNL-CI)
1,270.~ LIQ
1,162.41 WINE
37.00- DISC
2,395.46 ~,-CI)
4330.~
71-7100-%00
1010
71-7100-9540
71-?100-9~60
71-7100-9600
1010
71-?100-.3500
1010
TI)
PRE-PAIl)
467.24 295]
84.52 2958
274.~ 2956
60-6000-5300
1010 9500.00
01-2040-0000
lOlO 47 .18
1010 B7.25
22-4170-4110
1010
01-4340-3100
1010 520.00
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010 1~.34
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010 2395.46
01-4040-4110
01-4020-4110
1010 40.00
.,)
PAGE 3
A~-~02-O1
UENIX)R
NO. INVOICE M'iBR
LEAGUE OF }~ CITIES
M3250
MII~{EC, ASCO
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF
INVOICE DUE
[tAlE DAlE STATUS ~ I)ESCRIPTI~
VE]~II)OR TOTAL 40.00
PRE-PAIO 16.80 MAY GAS
6/30/89 6/30/89 16.80 dR)l-CO
VENDOR TOTAL 16.80
PRE-PAID 288.00 I)EF ~ 6/24 PR
6/30/89 6/'30/89 288.00 JRIJ.-CI)
~ RETIREJ',ENT SYSTE]I ~qEND~XR TOTAL ~.00.
M3410 PRE-PAID 35.00 SAFETY CDUNCL BANQ-HUDSN
6/30/89 6/30/89 35.00 dRt4.-[:D
~ ~EI'Y CDJNCIL VENI)DR TOTAL ~.00
M3520 PRE-PAID 63.24 POSTO F~ WTR BILLS
63.25 POSTG ~ WTR BILLS
6/30/89 6/30/89 126.49 dR)l-CO
MDUNI) POSTMASTER VENDOR ll]TAL 126.49
P3950 ' PRE-PAID 6,204.31 PERA 6/24 PR
6/:)0/89 6/,'30/89 6,204.31
)~ E R A' . VENDOR TOTAL 6204.31
04171 PRE-PAID 2,166.29 LIQ
169.3 WIG
45.05- DISC
6/'30/89 6/30/89 2,290.59
PRE-PAID 1,B59.41 LIQ
604.7'3 WIG
43.27- OISC
6/30/89 6/30/89 2,420.89 dR~i.-CI)
QUALITY WIG & SPIRITS VENI)OR TOTAL 4711.~
R4259 PRE-PAID 616.96
6/'30/89 6/30/89 616.96
ROBERT E dOHtSON VENDOR TOTAL 616.96
S4500 PRE-PAID 10,488.27
6/30/89 6/30/~ - 10,488.27
STATE BA~ OF MOUND VENBOR TOTAL 10488.27
TOTAL ALL VENIE]R9 145,162.76
FIT 6/24 PR
dRl~-*[~
01-4340-3720
I010
01-2040-00(X)
1010
01-4140-4110
1010
73-7300-3210
78-7800-3210
1010
01-2040-00(X)
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-~20
71-7100-<~:,0
IOlO
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
01-4340-3100
1010
01-2040-0(XX)
1010
PRE-PAID
AMOLmfF CHEI~K t
16.80 29571
126.49
6204.31
2959~
2420.89 2958~
616.96 2958'
.)
PAGE
6P-C02-01
VENOOR INVOICE ~ HOLD
7/06/~
RCER L,~4 ~ LANDSCAPING ~ TDTAL
AO060
7/06/89 7/06/89
V~EOR TOTAL
AIR CO(tI'DIVISIDN
A0199
ALLSTATE SALES CDR~
A0205
7/06/89 7106/89
VENDOR TDTAL
71O6189 7/O6189
VEN~ TDTAL
7106189<2 7/06/6<)
ALTERNATIVE STAFFING, INC VENI]OR TOTAL
A0331
AMSTERDAM PRINTING
A0371
APPLE VALLEY REAI)Y MIX
B0550
7106/89 7/O6189
VENOCR TOTAL
7/06/89 7106/89
UENI)OR TOTAL
7/06/89 7/O6/89
I.&4,2.00
1.040.00
2,t,.~.00
107.45
6.95
28,31
142.71
142.71
&4.98
18.81
11.97
11.97
6.84
18.81
11.97
25.65
171.00
171.00
53.13
52.13
53.13
452.76
452.76
452.76
26.48
26.48
13.24
26.48
13.24
105.92
105.92
20.85
17.90
13.&4
4.12
7.20
~.10
CITY OF ~
[1ESCRIPUON
REPAIREI) LAWNS
REPAIRED .LAWNS-BEI3FORD
LABELS
DIS~'TI'E DRGANIZER
POLY BINIEF~
,.mRit.-CD
dULY RADIO ~ CDKFRACT
dULY RADIO ~ CONTRACT
dULY RADIO ~ CDNlt~ACT
JULY RADIO SEtW CDhq'RACT
JULY RADIO SERV CDNTRACT
dULY RADID SERV O]NTRACT
dLLY RADID ~ CONTRACT
dULY RADIO SE~V CONTRACT
GUIDES
ROLOI]6X,FDU]ERS
BINIER,PAPE~,PEN
FLD~IERS,PLANTS
FOAM
FR~S
CANI)Y-CIT'F DAYS
,JRI~L-CO
73-7300-4200
78-7800-421X)
1010
PRE-PAIl}
A~
Tll
73-73(X)-21O0
01-4190-2100
01-4020-21O0
1010
01-4280-3950
01-4340-3950
01-41 c/0-39=,/)
01-4,,%90-3950
01-4140-3950
73-7300-3950
78-7800-3<)50
22-4170-3950
1010
1'010
01-4140-1300
1010
01-4190-2100
01-4020-2100
01-4070-21O0
01-4140-2100
01-4090-2100
1010
01-4340-.~XX)
1010
22-4170-2100
22-4170-2280
22-4170-2200
78-7800-2300
01-4020-2200
01-4140-2200
AP-C02-O1
I"UK LJM Rb~'
CITY OF ~
dUUKNAL
AFIX{NT DESCRIPTION ACCOtJNT NUMBER
PRE-PAID
AMOLltT
uHtc.
TI~
CI-E~ I
BEN FRANKLIN STORE
C0920
CITY DF MOUNO
C0940
CLEAN STEP RENTAL
C0970
VEI~[IX)R ll]TAL
7/06/89 7106189
VENDOR TOTAL
7/06/89 7/06!89
VENDOR TOTAL
7106/89 7106189
COCA CDLA BOTFLING-MIDWEST UENI~ TOTAL
CLIO0
71O6189 7106/89
COPY {XJFLICATING PRODUCTS VEHIX)R TOTAL
01200
7106189 7/O6189
DAY DISTRIBUTING CD VENDDR TDTAL
D1218
7106189 7106189
DE].ANO FIRE CONTROL
VENDOR TOTAL
D1230
--)
DEIiORIS SCHWALBE
D1320
~ BRYCE
D1349
~ W. NIELSEN COlickY
DI~
o q E's 66 SERVICE
7/O6/89 7/O6f89
~ TOTAL
7/06/89 7/O6/89
VENDOR TOTAL
7/O6/89 7/O6/89
VE)O[D TOTAL
7/O6/89
YENgOR TOTAL
93.10
15.24 WATER BILL-LIQ 71-7100-3740
15.24 JRNL-CD 1010
15.24
21.08 ~RU6 RENT 01-4320-4210
21.08 dUbE RUG RENT 71-7100-4210
42.16. J~NL-CI). 1010
42.16
406.65 JJNE MIX 71-7100-9540
406.65 J~J~.-go 1010
21.00 JUbE COPIER MAINT 73-7300-3?50
21.00 JRM.-CI) 1010
21,00
5,119.02 JUME BEER 71-7100-9530
I010
5,119.02 dR)l-CD
5119.02
91.20 CLEAN,RECHGCYL
91.20 dRI~.-CD
91.20
4.62 ASSESSIT[ MTG
9.02 MILEAGE-SECT 8
42.46 dRNL-CD
42.46
417.00 · OL~ CHIEFS SALARY
417.00 ORI~-CD
SERVICE VALVE
d~-Cl]
417.00
7~8.30
7~8.30
7~8.30
22-4170-22b0
1010
01-4090-4120
01-4090-3340
01-4090-3340
1010
22-4170-1370
1010
73-73(X)-42(X)
1010
73-7300-2200
01-4280-2200
1010
NO. INVOICE DATE DATE STAll
PURCHASE
CITT OF ~OUNI)
AJ'K]UNT DESCRIPTIOH
JDURNAL
PRE-PAID
I)1360
71O6189 71O6189,
DLltSMORE ASPHALT CDII~A~,IY VE)II)OR TOTAL
E1420
DST SI~ BEVEP, AGE
E1430
EI~D SHUKLE
E1479
7/06/8~ 7/O6/89
VENI)OR TOTAL
7/06/89 7/06/8..7
VENI)OR TOTAL
7/O6189 7/06/89
~Y MEI)IF.,AI. PRODUCT* VENI)DR TOTAL
F16~)O
71O6189 71061889
FDIJ~ sT~ ~ SUt:"PLT VENI)OR TOTAL
F1710
FRANCE~ CLARK
G1870
GE)~ BABB
G1905
7/O6189 71O6189
VENDOR TOTAL
71O618'9 7/O6/89
VENOt1R TOTAL
71O6189 71O6189
GDF+IER STATE I]NE-C. AU., I~ VF_NI]O~ TOTAL
G1970
G~EG SKI)~'R
H2140
71O6189 71O6189
~ TOTAL
~ CD SI'ERIFF$ ~
~160
71O6189
71O6189
UENIX)R TOTAL
2,795.00 ASPHALT -W ! L~IRE, E)IERALO
2,795.00 JRNL-C1)
2795.00
7,327.40 ~ BEER
7,327.40 JR~-CD
7327.40
61.96
13.~ ~ MTG
75.60
~.60
107.10 ~Y SEI',SC~'EI'Y ~S
107.10 JRNL-CD
I07,10
49.99 JU~E MIX
162.80 ~ MISC
212.79 JPJI_-CD
212.79
~.~ ti(FDA ~G EXP
~.~ JR/41_ -CI)
12,50 I'E]IB-GOM-ER OME ~
12.~ I'~EMI)-GOFI.ER ~ CALL
2f.00 ,JRM.-CI)
7.04 MILEAGE
7.04 dRM.-CD
7.04
430.~ F. AY BO0(I~ FE]E
~.00 I~TAIJ. EQUIP
452.~ JR~i.-CI)
452.83
73-7300-3800
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
01-4020-4'110
01-4040-4120
I010
22-4170-2270
1010
71-7100-9540
71-7100-9~0
1010
01-4040-41~
1010
22-4170-1370
1010
73-7300-4130
78-780(041~
1010
73-7300-3340
I010
01-4110-4250
01-4140-3950
1010
01-4110-4250
-.)
PAGE 4
~-C02-01
VENDOR I~fCOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
7/O6/89 7/O618~
)~ CD TREASURER VE]~ TOTAL
J2440
7/O6/89 7/06/89
J B DISTRIBUTING VE~ TOTAL
~YCEi~!.SON
KAR PRODUCTS
L2T70
7/O6/89 7/06/89
VENDOR TOTAL
7/O6/89 7/O6189
VENIX~ TOTAL
7/O6/~ 7/O6/~
VENI)I]~ TOTAL
7/o6/~ 7/o6/~
LAKE MTKA C04SEI~VAFION 0I* VENI)OR TOTAL
L2810
LUTZ TREE SERVICE
7/O6/89 7/O6/89
VENDOR TOTAl.
UENI)ORT~AL
VENI)DRTDTAL
MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR VE]~OR TOTAL
7/O6/89 7/OO/B~-
~ F13~E CO~'IL~ICATION~ VEEX]R TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MOUND
~ ~SCRIPTI~
883.25 ~-C'I)
883.25
26.95 CHEMICALS
26,95 dR~L-CO
26.9S
9.78 MTO EXP
ACEOUNT ~
1010
01-4290-2250
1010
01-4190-41~0
9.78. J~iL-CI). 1010
9.78
11.00 RECYCLE MTG EXP 01-4270-41~
11.00 JR~.-CD I010
11.00
49.75 HEX NUTS, SCREWS 01-4280-23(X)
29,07 FUEL LI~ HOSE 01-4290-2310
78.84 JR~L-CD 1010
78.84
2,797.75 LMCI)-3Ri) INSTALLMT 01-4020-4130
11,191.00 LMCD-WEEI) HGd:~ST PROdECT 01-4020-4130
13,988.75 d)~4.-CI) 1010
13988.75 '
91.16 FILTERS, TIRE 01-4340-2310
91.16 dRNL-C)) 1010
881.25 AINANCE-SPI ALUMNI TRAING-KY 01-4140-4110
881.25 dR~,-CD 1010
881.25
~.00 'TREE RE]'IOVAL 01-4340-5110
1010
7,342.90 ~ BEER
7,342.90 JRNL-CD
7342.90
45.80 dULY PA6ER RENT
45.8O JR)m.-cI)
45.80
71-7100-9530
1010
01-4140-3950
1010
PRE-PAIO
AMO~
DECK, !
~-C02-01
1'13170
DATE DATE STATUS
7/O6/89 7/06/~
METRO WA~I'E CQNTROL COiliI* ~ TOTAL
MI[]~A~i I~WN
7/06/8~ 7/O6189
VENDOR TOTAL
7/06/8~ 7/O6/89
k~ENI)QR TOTAL
7/06/89 7/O6/89
VEN~ TOTAL
7/06/89 7/O6/89
MN DEPT DF PUBLIC SAFETY ~ TOTAL
M3~70
7/06/~ 7/06/89
~ VARIFY TESTING LABOP, ATO VEl, ti)DR TOTAL
7/06/8~ 7/06/8~
MOUND FIRE DEP~TI'ENT VE)4I)DR TOTAL
P4~X)O
P4060
7/O6/89 7/06/89
VENI%]R TOTAL
71O6189 7106/89
~ DISTRIBUTING CO VENDDR TDI'AL
R4199
7/06/~ 7/06/B'9
R C ELECTRIC, iNC VENDOR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CIT'I DF M~
i¥IOUNT DESCRIPTIDN
31,569.05 JUL)' ~ SERVICES
12,294.96- ,JULY SEWER SERVICES
615,86- J.ILl SEI~ER SERVICES
18,~.8.23 ,J~i,l-CD
49.S0 CABLE TV
49.5O JR~m..-CD
49.50 ·
12.31 ~ GAS
14.48 JJNE GAS
9.42 JJhE GAS
36.21 dSt-CD
3~.21
96.67 CELLLLAR TELE-PDL
96.67 ~-CD
96.67
150.00 2 QTR CD--CT CHG
60.00 DPERATIDNS ~S
210.00 JR~_-CD
210. O0
44.00 WATER ANALYSIS
44.00 ,.~NL-CD
4,456.75 ~ SALARIES
1,000.00 ~ MAINT
655.50 JJ~E DRILLS
6,112.25 ,JI~'~.-CI)
6112.25
310.90 dlliE MIX
310.90 JF~I.-CI)
310.90
2~3.06 REPLACE OUTSIDE LIGHT
243.06
243.06
78-7800-4230
78-1190-0000
78-3812-0000
I010
PRE-PAID
01-4030-3100
1010
01-4280-3720
73-7300-3720
78-7800-3720
1010
01-4140-3220
1010
01-4140-38(X)
01-4140-.':ti00
rOlO
$
73-7300-3100
1010
22-4170-1890
22-4170-3190
22-4170-1380
1010
71-7100-9540
1010
71-7100-5530
1010
01-4320-3800
1010
P~ 6
R420~
7106/89 7/O6/89
RANDY'S SANITATI~
R4280
VE),ID(]R TOTAL
7/O6/89 7/O6/89
RONALD ~ VENDOR TOTAL
R4~O
7/O6/89 7/O6/89
81370
VENDDR TOTAL
7/0~/89
VENDOR TOTAL
7/O6/8~ 7/O6/89
SPI~ING .PP~K CAR WASH VENDOR TOTAL
STREIC~ER'S
:)
71O6189 7/O6189
YE)II)DR TOTAL
7/O6/89 7/O6/~
SYSTE)~ SERVICE COMPANY VENDOR TDI'AL
T4716
IEI'PORA~IE~ TO GO
T¢730
7/06/89 7/O6~,'9
VElaR TOTAL
:)
T4770
7/O6/89 7/O6/89
VE)4I)DR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF I~
A~QUNT ~ESCRIPTIDN
73,00 dl.~~
73,00 dl~L-~
73,00
200.00 ~ ASST CHIEF SALARY
200.00 ,.~L-CD
498.12 dU~E ICE
498.12 JRM..-CO
4~, 12
286.50 8-9-10 HDSP-d KRAU~
286,50 ORIg.-CD
7.00 ,JUICE C~ WASfl
112.00 JUliE CAR WASH
11%00 di~-CI)
119.00
47.~ CAR DI~INO TDOLS
1~.70 AI~
17.00 A~
2&3.SS dI~L-CD
263,55
113.80 SERVICE WELL 7
113.80 dRNL-CD
113.80
27.50
31.59
87.48
140.94
26.33
101.25
85.05
500.14
LAKER-CITY DAYS AD-LIQ
LAkER-BITUil BIO AI)-(]] 110
LAKER-OPJYi-PROPERTY, KNIVES
LAKEfl-.LEC, ALS
LAKER-LEGPL.SH.A~Dfl VIEW ESCR
01-4320-3750
1010
22-4170-1370
1010
71-7100-97~)
1010
01-4280-1510
I010
01-4280-3810
01-4140-3810
1010
01-4140-2200
01-4140-2270
01-4140-22'70
1010
73-73(X)-4200
1010
01-4270-1300
1010
71-7100-35(X)
73-7300-3510
01-4140-3510
01-4190-3510
01-4190-3510
01-2300-0928
01-4190-3510
1010
71-7100-i~30
PRE-PAID
AMDUNT
DAT~
TIIE
CHEIl. !
-)
PAGE ?
AP-C02-O1
7/06/8~ 7/06/8~
~ DISTRIBUTING CO VE)41)(]R TOTAL
T~IO
7/o~/8~ 7/0~/~
TIMBE)~tALI. ~ING VENI)DR TOTAL
T4940
7/O6/89 7/O6/89
TRI-STATE ~ & CDNTROL I VENI)OR TOTAL
T4980
7/O6/~ 7/O6/89
TWIN CITY H(]I'E NICE ~ VENI)OR TOTAL
7/O6/89 7/O6/8~
VAND[EUEN-HAZARD-$TALLING5 VE]qI)OR TOTAL
WATER PR1]DUCTS COl%°~T VE]~E)DR TOTAl.
7/O6/8'9 7/06/89
I~=STOffiGq SAdI[TATION VE](OO~ TOTAl.
7/06/89 7/O6/89
WII)I~ER INC VE]~II)OR TOTAL
145670
7/O6/89 7/O6/89
WIllIAMS STORE I~ VIE)~)OR TOTAL
7/O6/89 7/06/8~ *
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MDUNI)
14174.~5
~94.32
~4.32
2,42'8.67
2,4~.67
24~.67
62.~
62,~
62.~
1,7~.~
1~.~
1~.~
1~.~
2~.~
1~.~
1,7~.~
I~.~
I,~.~
1,~.~
DESCRIPTIDN
PENTA TIMBERS
PtI'P REPAIR
· JRH.-CI) '
dUNE MIX
,.IR~-CD
~Y ~ CONSILT
~Y ~ CONS~LT-~ ESCR
,JRI~.-CI)
m'm~n's,~s
51~ ~
2996 BLLFF
NORll~
WIL~IRE-EI'ERALD
4~ ~
JR~.--CI)
RFr. SERVE ~IFI]RMS,BADGES
~-CI)
JJ.Y RETAII~ER
1010
PRE-PAID
01-23(X)-0377
1010
78-7800-38(X)
1010
71-7100-'~J~
1010
01-4190-3100
01-2300-0905
1010
73-7300-2300
72-7300-2300
1010
01-4340-3750
1010
72-73(X)-3800
73-7300-3800
73-73(X)-3800
73-7300-3800
72r7300-3800
1010
01-2300-0220
1010
01-4110-3100
. 'i _- 1010
CITY ()f MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
(612, 472-1155
JUNE 1989 MONTHLY REPORT
PARK DEPARTMENT
General Comments:
The beaches, summer park program, dock program, and daily main-
tenance were at their peak in June. Due to the addition oF a
second 72" Front deck mower in 1988 we are able to keep current
with the mowing.
To-date the Park Department staff includes: Deli Rudolph, Dock
Inspector; Bob Johnson, Maintenance; Kent Kirsh, Maintenance;
John TaFfe, mowing; Henry Proft, mowing; Howard Si mar, cemetery
caretaker; and Phil Haugen, downtown mowing.
Status of Projects
The new playground equipment has been installed at Tyrone Park.
New playground equipment is now being installed at Langdon Park
and should be Finished within two weeks. The land restoration
project and timber wall at Chester Park has been completed. The
areas which were dredged and riprapped last winter are now being
repaired.
Commons Docks
The Dock Inspector has finished his First round of inspections at
all dock sites. This year we have seen a lot of weeds on the
shoreline where the water has receded, and junk that has fallen
into the water. Notices have been sent out to cut weeds and pick
up litter. There are a number of old tires that have fallen From
docks into the water. The Park Commission recommended For the
year 1990 that no tires will be allowed on Commons docks.
Notices will be sent out with the 1990 dock applications.
The water level of Minnetonka has increased from the rain we have
received. We will be keeping a close watch on the lake level in
order to determined dock Fees For 1990 and to assess the pos-
sibility of inaccessible sites.
Tree Removal
There has been ten hazardous trees removed From City property and
two From private property. The effects of the 1988 drought are
now showing. The crowns on a number of trees have not produced
new growth yet, therefore, 1990 may show an increase in tree
removal.
June 1989 Monthly Report
Park Department
Page Two
We have seen an influx oF weed complaints, twelve in June. These
are handled the same way as a tree notice, we senO a notice via
certified mail giving ten days to comply. IF they do not comply
we hire a contractor and Forward the bill to the owner.
Summer Park Program
The in-park supervised program has begun. The preliminary report
from the program supervisor states that everything is going well
and there has been good attendance. We will be getting a status
report on the program at the end oF August from Westonka Com-
munity Services.
Cemetery
The grounds seem to be improving with the rain. Again, July and
August will determine iF we will need to do re-seeding in 1990.
JF:pj
CITY of MOUND
MEMORANDUM
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
f6!2} 472-t 155
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July I, 1989
City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff
Jan Bertrand, Building OCFicial ¢
June 1989 Monthly Report
STAFFING
During the month o6 June we had 22 working days, and I received
one day of vacation. The Inspection/Planning Department had two
Planning Commission meetings on June 12th and June 26th. I at-
tended two City Council meetings on June 13th and June 2?th.
Peggy James has attended one Park Commission meeting on June 8th
and tQo Planning Commission Meetings.
INSPECTIONS
The following inspections were conducted during the month of
June:
Site Inspections 68
Footing Inspections 31
Framing Inspections 17
Insulation Inspections 8
Drywall Inspections 6
Final Inspections 19
Progress Inspections 31
Erosion/Grading Inspections 4
House Moving/Demolition 4
Heating Inspections 3
Plumbing Inspections 8
Fire Sprinklers/Fire Code 1
Complaints 25
TOTAL 223
The above list does not include three inspections made by the
substitute inspector.
REPORTS AND PLAN REVIEWS
There were 6 plan reviews completed during June. The monthly
report For May was submitted to the City Manager. Reports were
submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission, normal cor-
respondence, and inspection notices. The budget request was sub-
mitted to Ed Shukle for FY 1990 for the Planning/inspection
Department.
June 1989 Monthly Report
Planning & Inspections
Page Two
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission Forwarded one minor subdivision, three
major subdivisions, one conditional use permit, and five
variances for final consiOeration to the City Council. The Plan-
ning Commission training meeting of June 26th reviewed one
variance request and the continuation of the process for a pos-
sible housing maintenance report to the City Council.
LEGAL STATUS
During June a formal complaint was requested for an illegal curb
cut installation at 6195 Sinclair Road as work was being done
without authorization or permit. Twelve citations were issued
for exterior storage violations, and one for house moving. The
City Attorney reviewed two plats with my office this month. The
City ,Attorney reviewed the status of several cases before the
courts during the month. The City Prosecutor and myself at-
tended the house removal hearing at Hennepin County Courts for
1657 Finch Lane on June 14th.
This month we sent out 18 notices For the illegal use of a single
Family dwelling at 4925 Bartlett Blvd., exterior storage, and
building code enforcement. Notices were sent to property owners
informing them to install erosion control and resolve drainage
problems.
TRAiNING/MEETINGS
I attended the City Council meetings, as well as the Planning
Commission meeting.
I attended the regular staff meeting on June 20th. I met with
the Fire Department to discuss the sprinkler and standpipe sys-
tems to be installed at the indian Knoll Manor, 2020 Commerce
Blvd. with hydrant flow tests taken.
CITY EQUIPMENT & PURCHASES
The City vehicle required the normal gasoline fills during the
month, and the power steering was repaired.
STATISTICS OF ACTIVITIES
The total number of building permits issued in the month of June
was 45 with a total valuation of $437,64I. The valuation Figures
are attached on the building activity report For June.
June 1989 Monthly Report
Planning & Inspections
Page Three
in addition, Peggy has prepared the monthly calendar for July
city meetings, public hearings, and events, and has arranged ap-
pointments for the inspection of buildings, and plumbing. She
has prepared the Planning Commission agenda and minutes, the' Park
Commission agenda and minutes, and typed correspondence for the
Building Official and Park Director. She has compiled month-end
reports for building activities, Sewer Availability Charge, and
U.S. Census Report.
' Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commis-
sion requests and requirements, site inspections for flood plain
verification, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as
no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance
notices, review status of various sites for the city prosecutor,
preconstruction meetings at the site for building permit applica-
tions, or realtors, fire damage and periodic commercial inspection
updates.
** 'The heating inspections during the construction of a project
are included under the framing and final inspection of the build-
ing. The heating installations mentioned are for separate equip-
ment being placed in homes and businesses.
NEW RESIDENTiAl
CONSTRUCTION
TOtal Noh-F&ntlty
CITY OF MOUND
5~4~ Maywood
Mound, MN 55364
~UILDING &CTIVITY REIK)RT
Oune. ]~, 1989
558,263
! TOTA~
L
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511
EMERGENCY 911
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Len Harrell
Monthly Report for June, 1989
STATISTICS
The police department responded to 984 calls for serv-
ice during the month of June. There were 29 Part I of-
fenses reported. Those offenses included 3 burglaries
and 26 larcenies.
There were 56 Part II offenses reported. Those of-
fenses included 4 child abuse/neglect, 12 criminal
damage to property, 1 weapons violation, 3 narcotics
violations, 2 liquor law violations, 4 DWI's, 3 simple
assaults, 7 domestics, (2 with assaults), 10 harass-
ment, 1 runaway, and 9 other offenses.
The patrol division issued 254 adult citations and 14
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 61 citations. Warnings were issued to
103 individuals for a variety of violations. There
were 65 crosswalk citations and 37 crosswalk warnings.
There was one juvenile arrested for a felony. Eleven
adults were arrested for misdemeanors and three
juveniles. There were 19 adults arrested for warrants.
The department assisted in 13 vehiclular accidents with
5 personal injuries. There were 22 medical emergencies
and 135 animal complaints. Mound assisted other
agencies on 16 occasions in June and requested assis-
tance 6 times.
Property valued at $14,144 was stolen during the month;
$2,452 was recovered.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE, 1989
II.
III.
INVESTIGATION
Investigators spent approximately 20 hours investigat-
ing 6 child protection situations during the month of
June. The department has been involved in 25 child
protection matters for the year.
Other cases investigated included a deprivation of
parental rights, theft of a credit card, assault,
thefts, several burglaries, NSF checks, harassment, a
personal injury accident, and a liquor license back-
ground. Several of the thefts were from boats docked
in the Shorewood Lane area.
Formal complaints were issued in 9 cases. Those com-
plaints included charges for worthless checks, harass-
ing communications, DWI and false information to a
police officer, maintenance of a gambling place and
license violations, driving after revocation, and open
bottle.
Officer McKinley became the department's new inves-
tigator replacing Sgt. Hudson who requested to be
transferred to patrol responsibilities. Sgt. Hudson
will still supervise both investigators on a daily
basis and assist in cases as needed.
Inv. Grand concluded our first school year of D.A.R.E.
and a culmination exercise was held that included stu-
dents, parents, teachers, and the police department.
Certificates were issued to the students and a short
presentation was made to the parents. The program has
been very well received by both the schools and
parents.
Our Lady of the Lake school has requested the program
for next year.
PERSONNEL/STAFFING
The department used approximately 166 hours of overtime
in June. Mound City Days accounted for 60 hours of
overtime and the "crosswalk detail" added some 45.5
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE, 1989
hours. The department issued 65 citations for cross-
walk violations during the period of the detail.
IV. TRAINING
Vo
officers attended 15 days of training in the month of
June. The training included firearms, D.A.R.E., "crack"
investigations, and pursuit driving policies.
RESERVES
The reserves donated 409 hours to the department and
the community .in June. Two hundred thirty-nine of
those hours were in assisting at Mound City Days func-
tions.
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
MONTHLY HOURS
JUNE, 1989
BADGE #
5
6
11
10
14
16
17
19
22
23
12
28
DETAILS
EMER RES. COMM
C/O SQUAD SERV
2.5 7.0 58.0
2.0
10.0
8.0
5.5
18.0
3.5 32.5
1 .5 7.0 23.5
34.0
6.0 29.5
2.5 3.5
3.0 - 17.5
H/F TRAIN INSTR RIDE
BALL ING TION ALONG
2.0
25.0
67.5
6.5
5.5
ADMIN
18.0
MEET
ING TOTAL
1 .0 91 .5
- 0
1 .0 11 .0
1 .0 13.0
1 .0 6.5
1 .0 19.0
36.0
0
1 .0 ~3.0
1 .0 35.0
1 .0 61 .5
1 .0 74.5
1 .0 28.0
TOTALS
15.0 20.0 240.0 0 101.0
5.0 18.0 10.0 409.0
ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH
Reserve Meeting
Mound City Days
Concert
Graduation Party
VFW County Commissioner
OFFICERS
R5 Nelson
R6 Niccum
RIO Swanson
Rll Romain
R12 Shell
R16 Hawks
R17 Kohman
R22 Fleming
R23 Vogel
R28 Geyen
OFFICER
Butch Hawks
Ruth Vogel
Dan Niccum
Steve Kohman
Sherry Svoboda
Dave Ne[son
John Romain
Jeff FLeming
Makiko Swanson
Tom Geyen
Jim Fox
Damion She[[
TOTALS
HOUND POLICE RESERVES
SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS
JUNE, 1989
DEPOSIT
0
6.50
0
19.50
0
13.00
0
6.50
6.50
6.50
0
6.50
$ 65.00
BALANCE
$336.50
459.50
277.50
104.00
117.00
148.50
104,00
6.50
6.50
6.50
0
6.50
S1573.00
Prepared by
David NeLson
DN/sh
2
OFFENSES
REPORTED
CLEARED
UNFOUNDED
JUNE, 1989
EXCEPT.
CLEARED
CLEARED BY
ARREST
PART ] CRIMES
Homicide 0 0 0 0
Criminal Sexual Conduct 0 0 0 0
Robbery 0 0 0 0
Aggravated Assault 0 0 0 0
Burglary 3 0 0 0
Larceny 26 2 2 0
Vehicle Theft 0 0 0 1
Arson 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 29 2 2 1
PART II CRIMES
Child Abuse/Neglect 4 1 2 0
Forgery/NSF Checks 0 0 0 0
Criminal Damage to Property 12 0 1 0
Neapo~s 1 0 0 1
Narcotics 3 0 0 3
Liquor Laws 2 0 0 2
DUl . 4 0 0 4
Simple Assault 3 0 2 0
Domestic Assault 2 0 0 2
Domestic (No Assault) 5 0 0 0
Harassment 10 0 1 0
Runaway/Incorrigibility/Truancy 1 0 0 1
Public Peace 0 0 0 0
All Other Offenses 9 0 1 1
TOTAL 56 1 7 14
PART III & PART IV
Property Dan~ge Accidents 8
Personal Injury Accidents 5
Fatal Accidents 0
Medicats 22
Animal Complaints 135
MutuaL Aid 16
Other Genera[ Investigations 708
TOTAL 894
Hennepin County Child Protection 5
CHIPS 0
TOTAL 984
3
15
ARRESTED
ADULT JUVENILE
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0
0 0
0 1
3 0
1 0
4 0
0 1
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
1 0
11 3
11 4
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
JUNE t 1989
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
THIS
MONTH
YEAR TO
DATE
Hazardous Citations 217
Non-Hazardous Citations 42
Hazardous Warnings 56
Non-Hazardous Warnings 33
Verbal Warnings 135
Parking Citations 61
DWI 4
Over .10 2
Property Damage Accidents 8
Personal Injury Accidents 5
Fatal Accidents 0
Adult Felony Arrests 1
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 32
Adult Misdemeanor Citations 3
Juvenile Felony Arrests 1
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 3
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 0
Part I Offenses 29
Part II Offenses 56
Medicals 22
Animal Complaints 135
Other Public Contacts 708
608
140
97
182
684
320
28
16
59
16
0
18
145
30
14
15
6
123
291
139
539
3,316
L~ST YEAR
TO DATE
642
324
196'
435
657
323
49
24
61
13
0
19
120
55
44
34
25
173
391
112
564
2,831
TOTAL 1,553
Assists 84
Follow-Ups 29
Henn. County Child Protection 5
Mutual Aid Given 16
Mutual Aid Requested 6
6,786
309
168
25
99
48
7,092
357
237
32
71
MONTHLY PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMMARY
JUNE, 1989
STOLEN
Bikes
Snowmobiles
Boats, Motors, Trailers
Clothing
Currency, Notes, Etc.
Jewelry & Precious Metals
Guns
Home Furnishings
Radio & Electronic Equipment
Ve~icles & Vehicle Equipment
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
$ 100
0
235
25
3,057
4,772
400
350
4.030
0
1.175
$14,144
RECOVERED
$ 0
0
0
0
2
2,100
0
350
0
0
0
$ 2,452
1
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Miscellaneous Tags
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
JUNE, 1989
ADULT
4
2
1
4
1
110
1
3
32
0
7
0
5
0
0
0
0
61
64
0
0
18
2
JUV
0
0
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
TOTAL
315
14
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
JUNEt 1989
WARNINGS
NO Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
ARRESTS
Warrant Arrests
~DULT
19
20
16
37
0
3
1
4
100
19
JUV
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
$
0
RUN: 30- J~JN-89
CFSO$
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
ACT
CODE
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09000 SPEEDING
09001 J-SPEEDING
09002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09004 RESTRICTED D/L
09010 BAC OVER .10
09012 OPEN BOTTLE
09014 STOP SIGN
09015 J-STOP SIGN
09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
09022 EXHIBITION DRIVING
09023 J-EXHIBITION DRIVING
09028 DRIVING ON PARK PROP.
09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION
09031 J-CROSSWALK VIOLATION
09040 NO SEATBELT
09041 J-NO SEATBELT
09100 P~RKING/ALL OTHER
09150 NO TRAILER PARKING
09200 DAS/DAR/DAC
09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
09300 LOST ARTICLES/OTHER
09312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
"CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05/26/89 THRU 06/25/89
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
16 19 28 P.~ 24
2 2
1
1
2 1
I 1
1
5 .2
1 1
3 2
1
1
I 1
6 11 29 18
1 1 3
3 4 3 4
1
7
7
19
1
17
8 3. 17
1 1 1
7 6 2
5 1 1
PAGE
TOTAL
110
4
1
1
2
1
7
2
5
1
1
2
64
5
18
1
42
19
32
1
9.
iUN: 30- JL;N-89
ES°3
ISN'S O~LY?
[TY ~ES:
NO
ALL
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09313 FOUND PROPERTY
09314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED
09430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS
09440 H/R PERSONAL INJURY ACC.
09450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
09451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC.
09500 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ACC/OTHER
09561 DOG BITE
09563 DOG AT LARGE
[EMPTED SUICIDE
09730 MEDICALS
09731 DETOX-MEDICALS
09732 CRISIS INT.-MEDICALS
09750 FIRES
09800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED
09801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
0~900 ALL HCCP CASES
09904 'OPEN DOOR/ALARMS
09930 HANDGUN APPLICATION
09945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON
09950 · INTELLIGENCE
09980 WARRANTS
09992 MUTUAL AID/8100
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05/26/89 THRU 06/25/89
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
3 I 1 1
1
1 1
2 1
3 1
1 2
8 1 ~
1 1
1 1
2 1 2
3 2
2
1
3 10
PAGE
TOTAL
7
2
3
1.
5
3
1.
7
3
1
16
3
2
1 f
5
1
1
1
1
19
6
tUN: 30-a~N-89
:FS03
PRIMARY ISN~S OI~LY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION N/LIKE -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
- CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05/26/89 THRU 06/:~5/89
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
09993 MUTUAL AID/6500
09994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER
09996 MUTUAL AID/NARCOTICS
A5351
A5352
A5~54
A5355
B3494
B3864
D8500
13060
J2500
J3500
K6004
M3005
M4199
M5350
M6501
M7701
N3090
N3190
03881
03882
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-CC~ THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC NRE'S NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION
CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS-UNK gEAP-CHLD-FAM
JUVENILELUSE OF TOBACCO
LIQUOR - OTHER
RUNAgAY
DkUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER
DISTURB PEACE-MS-OPEN SEAL LETTER-TELEGRM-PACK
DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR
OBSEHITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
1 1
PAGE
TOTAL
6
2
1
1
1
.1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
RUN: 30-JJN-89
ICF$03
PRIMARY ISR~$ ONLYT NO
~ITY LODES: ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
05/26/89 THRU 06/25/89
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Pl110
P2110
P3110
T0991
Tl169
T2029
T2159
T2169
T4011
T4159
T4169
T4991
T4999
U1503
U1512
U3496
PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UN[ INTENT
PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UN[ INTENT
THEFT-UN[ LVL VAL-FRM OTHER-MONEY
THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BU]LD]HG-OTH PROP
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM HOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
TNEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-250 LESS-M~-FRM PERSON-MONEY
iEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT~$250 LESS'~MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM OTHER-MONEY
THEFT-250 LESS-MS-FRM OTHER-OTH PROP
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-501-2500
THEFT-FE-OTHR VEH-NO MOTOR-2501-19999
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 LESS
U3506 'THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR-250 LESS
W3120 WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-PISTOL-NO CHAR
1
5
1
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
10
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
REPORT TOTALS:
106 54 155 100 87 2 6 6 2
518
RUN: 30-JU#-89
OFF01
PRINARY ISN'$ OflLY?
DISPOSITION COOES:
ACTIVITY CODES:
GRID:
'rES
ALL
ALL
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- NOLIND POLIC~ DEPARTHENT
ENFORS
OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DI~OSITIOg
05/26/89 THRU 06/'25/89
'ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING
PAGE 1
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
.... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
A5351 2
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEHPTS HRH-HANDS-ADLT-FAH
A5352 2
ASLT 5-1NFL]CTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ
A5354 1
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRH-HANDS-CHLD-FAH
A5355 1
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRH-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
B3494 1
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-CC~4 THEFT
B3864 ' 2
BURG 3-UNOCC HRES NO FRC-N'UNK ~EAP'CO~ THEFT
· ~'8500 : - 2
DRUGS-SHALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION
I3060
CRIM AGNST FA.M-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
0 2 0
J2500 1
TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J3500 3
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
K6004 1
DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS-UNK WEAP-CHLD-FAM
M3005 1
JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO
M41~x~ 2
LIQUOR - OTHER
M5350 1
RUNAWAY
M6501 1
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
0 2 1
0 1 0
0 1 0
0 1 1
0 2 2
0 2 0
3 1 2 1
0 I 0
0 3 0
0 1 1
0 1 0
0 2 0
0 1 0
0 1 0
2 0 0 2 100.0
0 0 I 1 50.0
0 0 1 I 100.0
0 0 1 I 100.0
0 0 0 0 .0
0 0 0 0 .0
2 0 0 2 lO0.u
0 0 I I 50.0
1 0 0 1 100.0
3 0 0 3 100.0
0 0 0 0 .0
0 0 I I 100.0
2 0 0 2 100.0
0 1 0 1 100.0
1 0 0 1 100.0
RUN: 30-dUN-89
OFF01
INSTALLATION NAME -- NOUND POLICE DEPAR1'F, ENT
Itt,leal
PAGE
PRH~tSNWS ONLY? YES
DIllON COl)ES: ALL
A~VXTY CODES: ALL
GRID: ALL
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES
DESCRIPTION REPORTED
ENFOR$
OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY D]SPOSZT]C~
05/26/89 THRU 06/25/89
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPT]ON CLEARED CLEARED
M7701
FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER
N3090 3
DISTURB PEACE-MS-OPEN SEAL LETTER-TELEGRM-PACK
N]190 5
DISTURB PEACE-NS-HARRASS]NG COMHUNICATIONS
05881
OBSENITY-HS-OSSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR
OBSEN[TY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
Pl110
PRoP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UN[ INTENT
PROP DAHAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK ~NTENT
0 1 0 I 0 0 1 100.0
0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
0 5 4 0 0 1 1 20.0
P3110
PROP DAHAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UHK INTENT
TOS~91 1
THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM OTHER-MONEY
Tl169 1
THEFT-HORE $2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
T2029 1
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
T2159 2
-THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
T2169 3
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTN PROP
T4011 ,
THEFT-250 LESS-MS-FRM PERSON-MONEY
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
T4029 1
250 LESS'MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0' .0
10 0 10 9 0 0 1 1 10.0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
RUN~ 30-dU#-89
INSTALLAT]Ofl NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE 3
OFF01
PRIMARY ZStl~S ONLY? YES E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTZVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL . 05/26/89 THRU 06/25/89
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPT]OH CLEARED CLEARED
T4159 5
THEFT'S250 LESS-MS'FRM NOTOR VEHICLE'OTH PROP
T&169 5
THEFT-S250 LESS-~S-FRM ~ATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
T~991
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM OTHER-MONEY
T4999
THEFT-250 LESS-HS-FRM OTHER-OTH PROP
0 5 5 0 0 0 0 .0
0 5 5 0 0 0 0 .0
I 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
U15o3 I o I 1 o o o o .o
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-501-2500 ·
U1512 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
THEFT-FE-OTHR VEH-NO HOTOR-2501-19999
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 LESS
1 100.0
I 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .~
U3506 1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR-250 LESS
I 0 I 0 0 1 0 I 100.0
g3120
WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-P[STOL'NO CHAR
REPORT' TOTALS - 74 3 71 47 13 2 9 24 33.8
FIRE DEPARTMent REPOI~
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
MONTH OF //7,/~,,~' MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE
M'TON~ BEACH - FIRE
EMERGENCY
NINNETEISTA - FlEE
E.ERGENCY
ORONO - FIRE
E.ERGENCY
SPRING PARK - FIRE
EHERGENCY
HUTUAL AID - FIRE
EHERGENCY
TOTAL FIRE .CALLS
TOTAL.EHERGENCY CALLS
RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL
G~SS g HISCELLANEOUS
FALSE ALARH
NO. OF HOURS'- MOUND FIRE
- HT~ BCH FIRE
- SHORE~OOD FIRE
ENEE6ENCY
TOTAL'
-~UTUAL AID FIRE
TOTAL FIRE HOORS
TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY HOURS
MUTUAL AIO RECEIVED
MUTUAL AID GIVEN
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA
Date:~ ~/~- ~
DRILL
R'E P OR T
Discipline and Team work
Critique of Fires
Pre-Plaining and Inspections
Tools & Apparatus
Identifying
Hand'Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First Aid and Rescue
Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
Time
Note:
Hourse Training Paid
G Excused ~
Unexcused
Miscellaneous: .~, ~V~%~C , I~¢~,'** ~
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams & Friction
Los s
House Burnings
Natural & Propane Gas
talk & Demonstrations
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzle & Hose Alliance
Inhalator Operation
Time
Present, Not paid
/
'~;/A- J. Andersen
· ~;~,'G. Anderson
~f~ J. Babb
~{/~_ J. Beauchamp
-~7~.D. Boyd
~;/~ D. Bryce
~{/~ S. Bryce
Q4~_ D. Carlson
J. Casey
S. Collin~
M. David
B Erickson
'~;/~. S. Erickson
~-~7~_ J. Garvais
~_ K. Grady
~U~_C. Henderson
~;/~ G. Johnson
~--7~-~_ B. Landsman
~ R. Marschke
'~J. Nafus
~M Nelson
~ A Opitz
G. Palm
M Palm
~ ~/~-- G. Pederson
~f;~ T. Rasmussen
~ M. Savage
~'//_ R. Stallman
~/~_ T. Swenson
~ W. Swenson
~/~. R. Williams
~k~_ T. Williams
Dr~lm~er
DATE
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
0
0
0
,./
0
0
J. Andersen
G. Anderson
J. Babb
J. Beauchamp
D. Boyd
D. Bryce
S. Bryce
D. Carlson
J. Casey
S. Collins
M. David
B. Erickson
S. Erickson
P. Fisk
J. Garvais
K. Grady
P. Henry
C. Henderson
G. Johnson
B. Landsman
R. Marschke
J. Nafus
MEN ON DUTY
TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS
~q
3
0
M. Nelson
A. Opitz
G. Palm
M. Palm
T. Palm
G. Pederson
T. Rasmussen
M. Savage
R. Stallman-
T. Swensen
W. Swensen
R. Williams
T. Williams
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA
Date:
DRILL
REPORT
Discipline and Team work
Critique of Fires
Pre-Plaining and Inspections
Tools & Apparatus
Identifying
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First Aid and Rescue
Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
Note:
Hourse Training Paid
G Excused ~
Miscellaneous:
Time
Unexcused
Pumper Operation'
Fire Streams & Friction
Loss
House Burnings
Natural & Propane Gas
talk & Demonstrations
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzle & Hose Alliance
Inhalator.Operation
O Present, Not paid
Time
//~- J. Andersen
% "G. Anderson
~ ~ J. Babb
~ ~ J. Beauchamp
.D. Boyd
~ D. Bryce
~ S. Bryce
~ D. Carlson
J
. Casey
S. Collins
M
. David
. B. Erickson
~,~~.~ S. Erickson
J Garvais
K Grady
C Henderson
~,~ G. Johnson
B. Landsman
, R. Marschke
J. Nafus
M. Nelson
A. Opitz
~____~ G. Palm
M. Palm
T.
W.
R.
T.
~ G. Pederson
Rasmussen
Savage
Sta 1 lman
Swenson
Swenson ,.
Williams
Williams
- ' illmaster
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 5, 1989
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTORZy~'~
JUNE FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
INVESTMENTS
The following is April
Balance 6-1-89
investment
activity:
$7,586,022
Bought:
CD 9.50 Due 12-29-89 4M Fund 100,000
CP 9.50 Due 9-15-89 Dain 317,435
Repo 9.10 Due 10-13-89 Marquette 150,000
CP 9.30 Due 11-09-89 Dain 241 ,313
CD 8.90 Due 12-12-89 First MN 100,000
CD 8.80 Due 12-29-89 Mound 300,000
CP 9.10 Due 9-01-89 Marquette 393,337
Ma
tured:
CP 9.10 Marquette (286,359)
FNMA 9.12 American (200,976)
CP 9.40 Marquette (41 9,639)
CD 8.50 Mound (100,000)
~D 9.00 First Minnesota .(_!OO,000.)
Balance 6-30-89 $8,081 ,133
We received the first portion of the May tax settlement on June
22, 1989 for $550,000. The cash balance in the General Fund fell
from $798,000 on January 1, 1989 to-$70,000 on May 31st. This
demonstrates the need to .maintain an adequate year end fund :
balance.
:,~ ,,he admiss!on or access to. or treatment or er'-: r: -er' ~ :tB Er3~zra~ a'q':' 1: , ' eS
CITY of MOUND
July 6, 1989
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
JUNE MONTHLY REPORT
There were 2 regular Council Meetings in June. Packet prepara-
tion was done for each of these meetings. Minutes were prepared
after each meeting. Fifteen resolutions and three ordinances
were prepared and the ordinances were published. There were a
lot of clean-up items from the two meetings and things that had
to b~ sent to various persons. From the May 23rd & 24th meetings
there were 8 resolutions and 3 ordinances prepared and the or-
dinances published.
June was a very busy month for me. Mound City Days took up part
of my time the first week. I think we're made more progress in
developing some civic pride in our community from the comments
after the weekend.
The ordinance book needed updating and that took several days of
very tedious work. I hope everyone has inserted their updated
pages.
The Optec III-P vote tabulators were taken to Golden Valley to
have the key switches replaced. This work was done under war-
ranty and we now have the tabulators back.
Ed and I attended the League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Ac-
tion Conference. They had a lot of very beneficial sessions.
I also attended a Minnesota Clerks' & Finance Officers' Associa-
tion Region 4 Meeting in LeCenter.
There were the usual calls from residents and questions from the
general public on property and other various issues.
fc
1
Z-F OC~L.¢[ Op2Ortun(ty Employer that does not d:soriminate on ;~-,e b2_~',s of fac( ¢'%*- "2: 3¢:: i' ~R or hc ,.,h/c~,cu status
in the admission or access tO or treatment or er,-; 3yment tn, its $*z~c's'--s 2"2 activities
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAvWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364
(6121 472-1155
July 6, 1989
TO: Ed Shukle
FROM:
Joyce Nelson
Recycling Coordinator
SUBJECT: June's Recycling
June 3 and the 17th were the Saturdays of the drop-off site.
June 3rd BFI came here with 2 trucks, they finished with 4.
On t'he 17th we just planned for 5 trucks, 1 truck went to
the 5 different apartment complexes to empty the 90 gallon
containers there. We do have a problem with people leaving
items that are not recyclable such as phone books, plastic
pop bottles, wash tubs, paint cans (full of paint) styrofoam,
magazines, etc. BFI didn't have room for the corrugated
cardboard so we have been taking that to C & R Manufacturing
to be baled.
For the first 6 months of 1989 we have recycled 266.O1 tons.
Jan. 52.42 tons
Feb. 37.37
March 37.78
April 67.82
May 43.18
June 27.44
H~nnepin County requires us to recycle 10% of our waste stream
which would be 377 tons for 1989 so we're doing OK so far but
as you can see we did drop tonnage for the month of June.
An ecual opportundy Emp!oyer that does not discriminate on the b'~s s :f'~::e'o°h:r
the admission or access to, or treatment
CITY of MOUND
$34" MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, t,qNNESOTA 55354
(612) 472-1t55
July 6, 1989
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
June's Activity Report
The first half of the month was spent finishing up patching
watermain breaks and gate valve repairs.
We H'ad the street sweepers out in the downtown area cleaning
parking lots and streets getting things ship shape for the
Mound City Days, before and after the celebration.
The 21st we started to work on the streets that are scheduled
for seal coating, this is a slow process, about 90% of the
patching is done manually. We are shooting for the week of
the lOth for sealing.
We did some cement work this month, $375.00 for new curb on
Emerald, $175.OO for slab for dumpster and $300.00 for a drive-
way apron. We have a few more small jobs for this month.
The storm sewer repair job on Emerald has been completed.
total cost of project was $12,400.OO.
The
SIGN WORK
3 Stop
6 No Parking
3 Slow Children
2 Pedestrian crossing
1 Hidden Driveway
Straighted 14 posts
CEMETERY
Staked out 3 graves and 5 stones. We also cleaned up dump area.
ir: the admission or access to, or treatment or employment :n, ,~s %',:~:ram~ aris act,,
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 6, 1989
TO: Ed Shukle
FROM: Greg Bergquist
Mechanic
SUBJECT: June's Shop Repairs.
POLICE DEPT.
840 - cage bracket repair and service flat tire
841 ~ normal service
842~- transmission filter, oil line repair, normal service
843 - normal service
844 - normal service, flat tire
845 - normal service
847 - normal service
S-lO - coolant and battery replacement
STREET DEPT.
Boom Truck - exhaust repair
Unit 8 - brake adjustment
Loader - normal service
SEWER & WATER
Unit 9 - brakes and normal service
Unit 15 - exhaust repair
Unit 16 - fuel pump
Unit 18 - exhaust repair
Unit 21 - normal service
PARKS DEPT.
Bobcat - normal service
opportunity Empioyer that does not discriminate on the :._zs of r~:e ~_::: ~r;::g":: ': : · ::r ha,~d c32,~:~'/ :<atus
CITY of MOUND
534! MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINN£SOTA 55364
f612) 472-'~ 155
July 6, 1989
TO:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM:
Greg Skinner
Water & Sewer Supt.
SUBJECT: June's Activity Report
WATER DEPT.
In J-une 23 pumped 30,264,000 gallons of water. We have
completed our fire hydrant maintenance and main flushing.
This caused us to replace or repair approximately 20 some
fire hydrants. Well #7 is back on line, just in time for
the dry spell. We had to hire out for our yard repairs
this year. The reason is that we just can not get the
equipment to complete these ourselves.
SEWER DEPT.
In June the Sewer Dept. has concentracted on sewer line
cleaning. Progress is very good this year.
Ar equal opportumt'¢ Employer that does not discriminate c~ the basra ct ra3e coo' ~%t: &: :, ~ "3' '&Tc :a~;pec status
in the admission or access to. or treatment or employment ,n, t~s :'rczr3~ ~ a~c att,v, e~
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
July 5, 1989
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY MANAGER, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER~'
JUNE 1989 REPORT
Well, the month of June turned out to be respectable enough.
Sales. were $93,155. That compares to June of 1988 when sales
were $93,816. Thus, to date this year, sales are $431,372. Last
year sales at this time were $431,890. We are keeping pace with
last year which is a minor victory considering the extraordinary
numbers we put on the board in 1988.
Julie and I just went through a very hectic month with the hiring
and training in of four new employees. It's not bad when there
is only one new person to train in, but when you have as many as
we did all at once, well, needless to say, it was very difficult.
It seems like we do have a very good crew though. I was very
selective in who I chose. I've got two people in their late 20's
and two college kids. A good balance I feel. The only problem
being that in September, the college guys will go back to school
and the hiring process starts all over. As they say though,
we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
As you know by now, our landlord has proposed to us a new three
year lease beginning January 1, 1990 and expiring December 31,
'1992. Can't understand why there was not any increase in the
amount we pay per square foot. Want to hear another cliche?
Never look a gift horse in the mouth.
JK:ls
in the admission or access to, or treatment or ems :5'-:'-' - rts 2':~'ams ~.r-7 :' ,: .is
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATIOI.,I DISTRICT
EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL
FIRST WEED HARVESTING MACHINE LAUNCHING
This is it ....
8:30 am, Monday, July 10, 1989
SPRING PARK PUBLIC ACCESS
Hennepin County Road 15
{Immediately east of Water Patrol Hq)
JUL
6 ~989
Please join us in launching the
HATTIE MAY
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
Chairman Tom Reese
and
LMCD Chair JoEllen Hurr
will conduct ceremonies with
major equipment investors
and you, the supporting public
on this historic Lake Minnetonka occasion
Thank you for joining us at 8:30 am
~~ '~,. '?~ ~,,. ~ .~X, 7n ~ ~b¢ ~~-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
473-7033
JULY 1989 MEETING SCHEDULE ~O JUL
Friday 7
1:00 pm
Water Quality Sub Committee, Management Plan
Minnetonka City Hall
Saturday 8
7:30 am
Water Structures & Environment Committee
LMCD, 402 E Lake St, Wayzata
Monday 10
9:00 am
TENTATIVE - Please call to verify as "on schedule9
LAUNCHING OF THE FIRST WEED HARVESTER
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
Spring Park Access adjacent to the Water Patrol
Wednesday 12
7:00 pm
Advisory Committee, Management Plan
Tonka Bay Village Hall
Thursday 13
7:00 pm
Monday 17
4:30 pm
Lake Access Sub Committee, Management Plan
Tonka Bay Village Hall
Lake Use Committee
LMCD, 402 E Lake St, Wayzata
Thursday 20
7:00 pm
Friday 21
8:30 am
Use Management Sub Committee, Management Plan
Tonka Bay Village Hall
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
Sasha's Conference Room, Minnetonka Boat Works, Wayzata
Friday 21
1:00 pm
Water Quality Sub Committee, Management Plan
Minnetonka City Hall
Wednesday 26
7:30 pm
LMCD Board of Directors
Tonka Bay Village Hall
Thursday 27
7:00 pm
Friday 28
1:00 pm
Intergovernmental Relations Sub Committee, Management Plan
Tonka Bay Village Hall
Institutional Arrangements Sub Committee, Management Plan
Wayzata City Hall
SPECIAL NOTICE:
Wednesday 19
7:30 pm
Mayor's Meeting, Lake Minnetonka Area Cities
Shorewood Village Hall
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
473-7033
July, 1989
Sat 1
Sun 2
Mon 3
Tues 4
Wed 5
Thu 6
Fri 7
Sat 8
Sun 9
Mon 10
Wed ~2
Thu 13
Fri'14
Sat 15
Sun 16
Mon 17
Wed 19
Thu 20
~ri 21
Sat 22
Sat 23
Wed 26
Thu 27
Sat 29
Sun 30
EVENTS SCHEDULE
July 1989
Consolidated Sailing Races:
Wed. Night Bass Tournaments:
Consulidated Sailing Races:
Wed. Night Bass Tournaments
Consolidated Sailing Races
Zuhrah Shrine Skippers parade
Consolidated Sailing Races
Wed. Night Bass Tournaments
Consolidated Races
Lake Masters Swim Club (Mtka Challange)
Consolidated Sailing Races
Wed. Night Bass Tournaments
Consolidated Sailing Races
ll 'D JUL 3 1989
10:00 am Lower Lake
2:00 pm " "
10:00 am " "
10:30 am Upper Lake
10:00 am Lower Lake
10:30 am Upper Lake
6:00 pm Lower Lake
6:30 pm Upper Lake
6:15 pm Lower Lake
6:00 pm " "
10:00 am " "
2:00 pm Upper Lake
2:00 pm Lower Lake
10:00 am " "
10:30 am Upper Lake
1:30 pm Lower Lake
6:30 pm " "
12:30 pm " "
6:30 pm " "
6:30 pm Upper Lake
6:15 pm Lower Lake
10:00 am " "
1:00 pm " "
3:00 pm " "
9:00 am " "
10: O0 am " "
1: O0 pm " "
2:00 pm Upper Lake
3:00 pm Lower Lake
10:00 am " "
1:30 pm " "
10:30 am Upper Lake
6:30 pm Lower Lake
6:00 pm " "
6:30 pm Upper Lake
6:15 pm Lower Lake
6:00 pm Lower Lake
10:00 am " "
6:30 pm Upper Lake
2:00 pm " "
2:00 pm Lower Lake
10:00 am " "
10:30 am Upper Lake
2:00 pm Lower Lake
6:00 pm " "
6:30 pm Upper Lake
6:15 pm Lower Lake
10:00 am " "
2: O0 pm " "
2:00 pm Upper Lake ~30~.~
10:00 am, 2:00 pm Lower Lake
10:30 am Upper Lake
L/ KE
EC'D JUL $ t98,9
MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIC,
402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
June 29, 1989
BOARD MEMBERS
JoEIlen L. Hurr, Chair
Orono
Thomas Reese, Vice Chair
Mound
Jan Boswinkel, Secretary
Minnetonka Beach
John Lawman, Treasurer
MInnetrista
Oouglas E. Babcock
Spring Park
Marvin Bjorlin
Tonka Bay
David Cochran
Greenwood
Albert O. Foster
Deephaven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
John G. Ualinka
Victoria
Thomas Uartinson
Wayzata
Robert K. Pillsbury
Uinnetonka
Robert Rascop
Shorewood ~
Robert E. Slocum
Woodland
TO: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MUNICIPALITIES
We are pleased to enclose the 1990 Lake Minnetonka Conservation. Dis-
trict budget. It has been certified by the LMCD Board of Directors
at its regular meeting June 28, 1989.
This budget reflects continuation of the District's obligation for
the Comprehensive Lake Management Plan being conducted by Arndorfer
Associates, Inc. It also reflects the added responsibility the Dis-
trict has undertaken with the Eurasian Water Milfoil weed harvesting
control program. The remaining District priorities have been
focused on resolving low water problems being experienced by
residential, homeowner association, and marina dock installations.
The Comprehensive Lake Management Plan through 12/31/89 will have
cost $210,200 for twenty months of study, evaluation and plan de-.
velopment. The balance of $39,800 included in the 1990 budget will
close-out this immediate commitment. The initial $210,200 is being
funded through reserve funds and current operations. Reserve funds
will be depleted before year-end. These funds will be reimbursed
by a $100,000 grant the MN Department of Natural Resources has de-
signated for this purpose which it received through the 1989 legis-
lative session for its shoreland and lake management priorities.
LMCD will thus have borne $150,000 of the management plan costs.
LMGD member cities are to be commended, incidentally, for their
active participation in the subcommittees which are shaping the
plan's outcome. Significant input from the municipalities lies
ahead for the.balance of 1989. Your city's opportunity to be a part
of it is still encouraged.
The weed control program has made a significant impact on both the
financial as well as administrative demands of the District. The
investment of time and money has produced the desired results. Over
$160,000 from private individuals and organizations for the "Save
the Lake" fund, plus some $83,000 from the 'LMCD member municipal-
ities, provides the 1989 operations fund for the weed cutting
service.
Recognizing that this program must be maintained annually, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers is prepared with a 1990 matching grant,
budgeted at $230,000. This grant plus state participation through
the MN DNR 'and County participation as detailed on Page 5 of the
budget require local matching funds. This brings the need to LMCD
member municipalities for $60,000 for 1990. That amount represents
the principal increase in the 1990 budget. We trust you recognize
the value and benefits of this program. Citizen response has been
both favorable and generous with volunteer as well as financial
support.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
LHCD Municipalities 2
June 29, 1989
Additional'budget changes we wish to bring to your attention
include:
* Salaries, reflecting an interne addition, 1/2 of the salary, or
~8,000, is budgeted under Administration. The remaining 1/2 is
budgeted in the Eurasian Water Milfoil special project. Current
staff salaries are projected for a 3% increase, with consideration
for merit increases.
* Professional Services includes additions for Contract Secretarial
Services to record board/committee meetings, started in 1989, at
$4,000. A temporary service contingency is included at $2,000.
A financial service was approved to prepare quarterly financial
reports at $760 annually, with the Dock Inspector included at
$2,320.
* Office rent is increased 15% to meet City of Wayzata needs on the
lease. Current office space is 736 sq.ft.
* Consulting service includes $8,160 for Frank Mixa, assisting in
the management plan and special research projects.
While the 1990 budget is 20% larger than 1989's projected outcome,
city increases may vary above that amount since the proportionate
operating cost is 51% higher ($149,490 compared with $99,032 - again
reflecting $60,000 added for the weed control program).
Your Board representative, Chair JoEllen Hurr, and the Executive
Director will be present for your city council discussion of this
1990 budget. Your advance invitation will be welcome, including
any questions prior to that time.
Minnesota Statute Chapter 907, Section 4 provides: "Expense of the
district shall be'borne by the municipalities. The portion of the
expenses borne by each municipality shall be in proportion to its
assessed valuation."
Section 5 provides:
The board of directors of the district shall on or before
July 1 of each year, prepare a detailed budget of its need for
the next calendar year and certify the budget on that date to
the governing body of each municipality in the district
together with a statement of the proportion of the budget to
be provided by each municipality. The governing body of each
municipality in the district shall review the budget, and the
directors, upon notice from any municipality, shall hear ob-
jections to the budget and may, after the hearing, modify or
amend the budget, and then give notice to the municipalities
of modifications or amendments. It shall be the duty of the
governing body or board of supervisors of each municipality
in the district to provide the funds necessary to meet its pro-
portion of the total cost to be borne by the municipalities
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
LMCD Municipalities 3 June 29, 1989
as finally certified by the directors, the funds to be raised
by any means within the authority of the municipalities and
to pay the funds into the treasury of the district in amounts
and at times the treasurer of the district may require. The
municipalities may each levy a tax not to exceed one mill on
the taxable property located therein, to provide such funds.
Said levy shall be within all other limitations provided by
law.
Thank you for your interest.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
uge~ne~R. Stromm
Executive DirectOr
ERS:jim
enc
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1990 BUDGET
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
1990 BUDGET
1987 1988 1989
Actual Actual Jan-May
REVENUE
LMCD Communities $ 62,912 $ 91,048 $ 78,260
Other Income 106,866 150,825 109,216
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $169,778 $241,873 $187,476
1989
Projected 1990
Estimate Adopted
$ 99,032 $149,490
139,990 137,000
$239,'022 $286,490
DISBURSEMENTS
Administration
Personal Services
Salaries $ 64,045 $
Auditing Services 650
Total Personal Services 64,695
Contractual Services
Telephone 747
Postage 1,767
Printing, Pub. & Adv. 4,120
Utilities 344
Maintenance - Office Equipment 627
Janitorial Services 660
Professional Services 3,760
Total Contractual Services 12,025
Commodities & Supplies
Office Supplies 2,335
Books & Periodicals 216
General Supplies 349
Total Commodities & Supplies 2,900
Other Charges
Office Rent 3,600
Insurance & Bonds 1,666
Memberships 280
Employer Contributions 10,176
Mileage & Expenses 939
Total Other Charges 16,661
67,669 $ 30,850 $ 69,960 $ 80,060
855 -- 750 750
68,524 30,850 70,710 80,810
685 555 1,332 1,4"'
2,751 653 1,567 1,90U
1,145 940 2,256 2,500
490 148 360 360
2,469 363 1,400 1,500'
720 225 720 720
2,986 1,371 7,800 10,080
11,246 4,255
15,435 18,460
3,600 1,800 3,600 4,140
3,842 2,263 3,300 3,500
80 ......
10,863 4,642 11,141 ll,b
1,736 481 1,200 1,300
20,121 9,186 19,241 20,750
2,658 1,481 2,100 2,500
66 50 210 210
579 255 380 400
3,303 1,786 2,690 3,110
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
1990 BUDGET
DI~BURBEMENT~
Administration (continued)
Capital Outlay
Office Furniture, Fixtures
& Equipment
Total Capital Outlay
1987 1988 1989
Actual Actual Jan-May
Total Administration
1989
Projected 1990
Estimate Adopted
$ 70 $ 921 $ -- $ 1,800 $ 2,500
70 921 -- 1,800 2,500
$ 96,351 $104,115 $ 46,077 $109,876 $125,630
Legal
Legal Services
Prosecution
Process Service
Total Legal
Consulting Service
Total Consulting Service
Committees
Committee & Contingency
Public Information
Total Committees
Special Service - Eurasian Water Milfoil Operating
Total Special Service -
Eurasian Water Milfoil Operating
23,002 20,720 5,221 18,000 18,000
15.,656 13,580 4,285 13,500 13~'500
1,643 593 1,400 1,400
38,658 35,943 10,099 32,900 32,900
5,000 96,577 60,504 144,200 47,960
5,000 96,577 60,504 144,200 47,960
2,886
14,880 --
2,373 237
2,886 17,253 237
4,000 5,000
15,000 15,000
19,000 20,000
60,000
60,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND -
DISBURSEMENTS
$142,895 $253,888 $116,917 $305,976 $286,490
6-27-89
Lake
Minnetonka Conservation District
1990 BUDGET
DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENSE
Deephaven
Excelsior
Greenwood
Minnetonka*
Minnetonka Beach
Minnetrista
Mound
Or0no
Shorewood
Spring Park
Tonka Bay
Victoria
Wayzata
Woodland
Assessed
Value
(1,000's)
$ 50,280
23,292
9,672
572,629
13,127
40,511
71,780
112,375
61,340
17,269
23,440
19,529
64,942
13,338
% of % of Budget Share of
Total Resulting from $149,490
Assessed 1/3 Mil $29,898 Maximum 1990
Valuation Taxable to Minnetonka Budget
4.6% $ 16,760 7.7% $ 11,511
2.1 7,764 3.6 5,382
0.9 3,224 1.5 2,242
52.4 43,408 * 20.0 29,898
1.2 4,376 2.0 2,990
3.7 13,504 6.2 9,268
6.6 23,927 11.0 16,44~
10.3 37,458 17.3 25,862
5.6 20,447 9.4 14,052
1.6 5,756 2.7 4,036
2.1 7,813 3.6 5,382
1.8 6,510 3.0 4,485
5.9 21,647 10.0 14,949
1.2 4,446 2.0 2,990
Total
$1,093,524 100.0% $217,040
100.0%
$149,490
*Maximum of $29,898
6-27-89
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
1990 BUDGET
COMPARISON 1989 1990 TAX LEVIES
Deephaven
Excelsior
Greenwood
Minnetonka
Minnetonka Beach
Mznnetrlsta
Mound
Orono
Shorewood
Spring Park
Tonka Bay
Victoria
Wayzata
Woodland
Share of $99,032
1989 Budget
$ 7,526
3,862
1,486
'19,806
1,981
5,942
11 191
16,934
8 913
2 773
3,466
2,971
10,200
1,981
Share of $149,490
1990 Budget
$ 11,511
5,382
2,242
*29,898
2,990
9 268
16 443
25 862
14,052
4,036
5,382
4,485
14,949
2,990
Change
$50,458
$ 3,985
1,520
756
10,092
1~009
3,326
5,252
8,928
5 139
1,263
1 916
1,514
4,749
1,009
Total
$99,032
$149,490
$50,458
*Maximum by law
6-27-89
..LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL 1990 BUDGET
ADVANCE COPY TO:
LMCD Offcers
INCOME:
U S Army Corps of Engineers Matching Grant
MN DNR
Hennepin County
LMCD Communities
LMCD "Save the Lake" Private Fund Raising
Dedicated Reserve Fund for Equipment Additions
TOTAL INCOME
$ 230,000
30,000
85,000
60,000
55,000
105,000
$565,000
EXPENSE:
Contract Service, 15 weeks at $25,000 per week
Equipment Amoritization on 10 year basis ($400M value)
LMCD Program Administration (temporary contract
service and reimburse internal administration)
Contingency
Equipment additions from dedicated reserve fund
TOTAL EXPENSE
$ 375,000
40,000
25,000
20,000
105,000
$565,000
6/23/89
MINNESOTA
Department of
Public Service
C'D JUL ,3 19; 9
Energy Division
(612) 296-5120
900 American Center
150 East Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
~une 27, 1989
Ms. Fran Clark
City Clerk
City of Hound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota
55346
Dear Ms. Clark:
Your Community Energy Council Grant Application has been reviewed and
the Review Committee's recommendationhas been affirmed by the
MinneJota Department of Public Service. We are pleased to announce
that your proposal will be funded in the amount of $25,765 once a
list of Community Energy Council members representing all required
categories is received. The Review Committee encourages city council
or city staff representation on the Community Energy Council. The
grant agreement awarding the funds will require monthly written
reports by West Hennepin Human Services to the city staff and city
council and quarterly appearances before the city council to report
on the program.
Your application demonstrates the talent that communities can bring
to the solution of local energy problems.
We will process a grant agreement as quickly as possible once we
receive documentation of Energy Council membership so that your
project can beginon schedule.
If you have any questions or desire any assistance, please call me at
(612) 297-3602.
Sincerely,
Mark Schoenbaum, Manager
Governor's Community Energy Program
MS:jw
CC:
Tony Perpich
Marsha Battles-Jenks
Bruce Larson
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION
402 EAST LAKE STREET
DISTRICT
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERS
JoEllen L. Hurr, Chair
Orono
Thomas Reese, Vice Chair
Mound
Jan Boswinkel, Secretary
Minnetonka Beach
Mark Westlund, Treasurer
Wayzata
Marvin Bjorlin
Tonka Bay
David Cochran
Greenwood
Albert O. Foster
Deephaven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
Ron Kraemer
Spring Park
John Lewman
Uinnetrista
John G. Malinka
Victoria
Robert K. Pillsbury
Minnetonka
Robert Rascop
Shorewood
Robert E. Slocum ~
Woodland
TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: JULY 6, 1989
FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: JUNE REPORT - LMCD
1. GENERAL INTEREST ITEM~;
1.1 Eurasion Watermilfoil Task Force,
The delivery of the first two harvesters is three weeks
late, due in the most part to an extended period of rainy weather
in New York, where they are built, which interfered with their
painting operations. The growth of the weed is also a like period
late, so the net effect on the program is not significant. The first
machine will be launched in Spring Park, Monday, July 10,' with
the second following a week later. The remaining two LMCD
machines and the Parks machine will follow in the two to three
weeks. The program costs about $23,000 per week to operate
when all machines are functioning. We have the capability and
the need to harvest many more acres than we are presently
permitted for. This remains an open issue..
Schmidt beer (Heilman Brewing) has announced a
program of support for the research portion of the weed
program. These funds, amounting to at least $75,000 the first year
will be overseen by the Freshwater Foundation, and dedicated to
finding a long term solution to the Eurasion Water Milfoil
problem. This is in keeping with our original plan.
1.2. Comprehensive Lake Management Plan
We are presently 14. months into the Plan project with 10
months remaining. The plan progress is about on the original
schedule. Summary of completion status of the various parts of
the plan is as follows: Lake Inventory Complete.
Recreational Use Monitoring 56% complete.
Environmental Studies Fisheries and Wetlands complete.
Water Quality remains. Public Safety Complete. Shoreland
Management - Shoreland management and on shore complete.
Upland near completion. Stakeholders' Studies- Just
beginning, an important piece!! Use Management - Lake
2
Access 25% complete. Plan Development.
be done in the final drafting and assembly.
Most of this will
More input from the cities on the sub committees would be
helpful in speeding up future consensus.
1.3 St Alban's Bay Marina
By working as an honest broker between the two sides, we
were able to establish a middle position that comes close to
satisfying both parties. Some details remain to be worked out, but
I feel that this potentially costly and divisive law suit has been
avoided.
2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS - MOUND
2.1 The 1990 LMCD budget has been drafted and submitted.
Only $60,000 of the next year's milfoil budget of $460,000 has been
passed on to the cities. I would like to meet with the council and
~o~ml~n ithe budget forecast at the appropriate time.
Mound Representative
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
TR:mac
cc. Gene Strommen
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
June 26, 1989
Present were: Chair BIll Meyer, Commissioners GeoFF Michael, Ken
Smith, Brad Sohns, William Thal, Frank Weiland, Vern Andersen,
and Jerry Clapsaddle, City Manager Ed Shukle, Buflding OfFicial
Jan Bertrand, and Secretary Peggy James. Absent and excuse~ was
Council Representative Liz Jansen.
Also present was the Following interested citizen:
Stutsman.
Marge
Chair Bill-Meyer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
TOUR OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Police Chief Lenny ltarre! directed a tour oF the Police Depart-
ment. He explained what each.room is-currently used For and em-
phasized how inadequate the present facilities are. Bill Thai
revie~ed the plans For the proposed addition.
MINUTES:
MOTION made by Thal seconded by Michael to approve the
Planning Commission Minutes of June i2, 1989 as sub-
mitted. Motion carried unanimously.
RECOGNITION:
A CertiFicate oF Award was presented to Marge Stutsman For 15
years oF secretarial service.
BOARD OF APPEALS:
Case No. 89-827: Daniel & Diane DeMatteo, 5]45 Emerald
Drive, Lot 27 3~ & part of 1~ Block.l, Shirley Hills Unit C.?
PID #24-!17-24-13 0037. Existing Nonconfoi.,inq Accessor~
Structure. ~
The Building OfFicial explained that the applicant ts proposing
to construct a conforming addition to his home which Includes
living area and an attached garage. However, there is an exist-
ing detached garage that fs encroaching into the public right-of-
way 1.4 Feet. This garage has cement block walls, therefore, is
a substantial building and would not be movable.
The Building Official recommended approval of a 20 foot Front
yard setback variance for the existing detached accessory build-
Ing upon the condition that the 1.4 Foot encroachment Into the
publlc right-of-way be removed. This would allow construction of
the addition to the principal building with conforming setbacks.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 26, i989
Page Two
The applicant, Daniel DeMatteo explained that he would like the
structure to remain so he may use the garage to store his boat
and lawn mower.
The Commission discussed their concern with the building
encroaching onto City property·
MOTION made by Thai, seconded by Michael to grant the Z0
foot front yard setback variance to allow construction
of the proposed addition upon the condition that the
encroachment be removed from the public right-of-way.
MOTION FAILED I - 7. Those in favor: Thal. Those
opposed: Andersen, Sohns, Weiland, Meyer, Clapsaddle,
Smith, and Michael.
The Commission discussed the need to remove the IG" from the ac-
cessory building. They also .questioned if a hardship existed.
They ~oncluded that there is enough lot area to construct a new
conforming detached garage and/or move the existing.
· MOTION made by Wetland, seconded by Michael, to bring
the accessory structure into conformance in its en-
tirety, thereby creating a conforming lot. MOTION
CARRIED 7-1. Rose in Favor: Andersen, Sohns, Weiland,
Meyer, Clapsaddle, Smith, and Michael. Those opposecl:
Thal.
This case will be heard by the City Council on July Il, I989.
The applicant, Daniel DeMatteo, expressed his distaste in the
Planning Commission's recommendation. He stated that if the
garage is not allowed to remain, he will have to redesign the
proposed addition/improvements because he will not have enough
storage area. He planned on putting $]20,000 worth of improve-
ments into the home, and wanted to keep. the garage to store his
boat.
DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONAL:
Discussion regarding Housing Maintenance Code / Truth in
Housing (FY[: letter from Minneapolis Area Association of
Realtors).
Meyer commented that the Commission needs to receive copies of
the complete set of the originally proposed ordinance before they'
can pursue any revisions. The commission is to review the or-
dinance before the next workshop meeting.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 26, t989
Page Three
Michael commented on the letter received From the Minneapolis
Area Association oF Realtors. He stated that there is something
in the proposed ordinance already pertaining to a buyer/seller
arrangement.
b. Nuisance Ordinance.
Meyer commented that he saw a revised Nuisance Ordinance pub-
lished In The Laker and questioned what was being done with it.
$ohns 'and Michael added comments that the Planning Commission
should be InFormed oF these changes. The Building OFFicial, Jan
Bertrand, explained that the changes made in the ordinance did
not pertain to building and zoning issues, therefore, she did not
Feel it necessary to inform the Planning Commission.
c. City Council Representatives Report.
MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Smith, to table the
Oity Council Report until Representative Jansen Is
present. Motion carried unanimously.
~ .... d. .Discussion regarding the proposed City Hall Addition
Sohns raised a concern with the wording in the proposal on page
pertaining to the Financing oF the addition.
Anderson stated he has received negative comments From citizens
regarding the proposed addition and Feels the people should be
allowed to vote on the issue.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Clapsaddle to adjourn.
the meeting at 9:t7 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest: