Loading...
1989-08-08 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNES0TA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1989 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 25, 1989, REGULAR MEETING. Pg. 2442-2449 CASE ~89-831: JAMES & SANDRA RUUD, 2233 LYNWOOD BLVD., LOTS 35, & PT OF 34, LYNWOLD ADDITION TO MOUND, PID #14-117-24 43 0045. Request: SETBACK TO PLACE AN ACCESSORY BUILDING WITH NO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. Pg. 2450-2463 SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CLASS III RESTAURANT (LIQUOR SERVICE RESTAURANT) IN THE B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LOCATED AT 4451 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUGGESTED DATE: AUGUST 22, 1989. Pg. 2464 4701 ~nD~Tn~ n~ TqT.AND DISCUSSION: REVIEW OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSES. Pg. 2465-2467 COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. SET PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE FUTURE UPGRADING OF CITY HALL FACILITIES. SUGGESTED DATES: AUGUST 22, 1989 SEPTEMBER.12, 1989 CITY PROPERTY GARDEN LEASE - LEO WALLIS LICENSE APPLICATIONS - N.W. TONKA LIONS 3.2 CHARITABLE BEER LICENSE SET UP LICENSE PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT 11. PAYMENT OF BILLS. Pg. 2468 Pg. 2469 Pg. 2470-2472 Pg. 2473-2485 Page 2440 12. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: A. July 1989 Department Head Monthly Reports. Pg. 2486-2524 Be Response from Keith Rennerfeldt, Principal Appraiser, Hennepin County on tax status of Westonka Community Services Building. Pg. 2525 Ce Letter dated July 26, 1989, from Mark Andrew, Hennepin County Commissioner on recycling issues. Pg. 2526-2529 LMCD Mailings. Pg. 2530-2544 Planning Commission Minutes - July 24, 1989. Pg. ~545-2547 Fe LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for July 1989. Pg. 2548-2549 Ge REMINDER: Annual National League of Cities Congress of Cities to be held in Atlanta, Georgia, November 25-29, 1989. Please let Fran know before August 28th if you are interested in attending. (You received this brochure separately.) Preliminary April 1, 1989, population and household estimates for the City of Mound as prepared by the Metropolitan Council. Pg. 2550-2553 Page 2441 116 July 25, 1989 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - JULY 25, 1989 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 25, 1989, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ah- tens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, Building Offi- cial Jan Bertrand, City Planner Mark Koegler and the following interested citizens: Bryan Clem, Ray Barnard, Orv Fenstad, Mechelle Severson, John Friden, James & Sandra Ruud, Henry Spott, Matt Ruppert, Robert Harding, Cliff & Carolyn Schmidt, Kay Ostman, Wm. Thal, Jerry Tasa, Ron Johnson, Pat Meisel and Stan Drahos. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten- dance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MINUTES Councilmember Jensen asked that the following corrections be made to the July'll, 1989, Minutes: Page 113 - second to the last paragraph "make" be corrected to read "maker"; and Page 114 - Resolution #89-83 - the maker and seconder of the motion was omitted. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to approve the minutes of the July 11, 1989, Regular Meeting as corrected and the July 18, 1989, Committee of the Whole Minutes as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. pUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was $4,250.73. The Mayor opened the Public Hearing. There was no response. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-85 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,250.73 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 117 July 25, 1989 CASE ~89-828: ROBERT HARDING, 5238 SEABURY ROAD, LOTS 8 & 14, BLOCK 24~ WHIPPLE~ PID ~25-117-24 21 0078, VARIANCE (RECOGNITION OF EXISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACK) The Building official explained the req~_est. The Planning Com- mission recommended approval. Mr. Harding was present and agreed with the proposed resolution. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 989-86 RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NON- CONFORMING STRUCTURE TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS FOR LOTS 8 & 14, BLOCK 24, WHIPPLE; PID %25-117-24 21 0078 (5238 SEABURY ROAD); P & Z CASE %89-828 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~89-829: STEVEN SEVERSON (4500 WILSHIRE BLVD.) , CAROL STODOLA (4510 WILSHIRE BLVD.), & GORDON C. ANDER- SON (2757 ANGLESSEY LkNE, LOTS 3,4,5,6,7,8, SE1¥ 1/2 OF LOT 2, AND 1/2 OF ADJACENT CARNARVON LANE, BLOCK 6, AVALON, PID ~'S 19-117-23 31 0018/0019/0014, MINOR SUBDIVISION The Building Official explained that this was approved originallY in 1981 but the resolution was never filed and has now expired. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The City Attorney suggested that the filing of this resolution could cause a problem with marketable title for all the persons involved if all the necessary legal documents have not be prepared and signed by all the parties holding interests in these properties. He suggested that the applicants obtain the service of an attorney to advise them of the proper course of action before this resolution is approved. MOTION made by Johnson moved, seconded by Ahrens to continue this matter to a later date to give the applicants time to obtain legal advice on the proper course of action to prevent title problems later. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #89-831: JAMES & SANDRA RUUD~ 2233 LYNWOOD BLVD., LOTS 35, & PT OF 34, LYNWOLD ADDITION TO MOUND, PID ~14- 117-24 43 0045, SETBACK TO PLACE AN ACCESSORI BUILDING WITH NO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY The Building official explained the request. mission recommended approval. The Planning Com-- July 25, 1989 Mr. & Mrs. Ruud were present and asked that they be allowed to construct the garage 18 feet from the east property line because the ground drops off and they would have to bring in more fill. Mr. Ruud further stated that the proposed resolution says the new garage will be 25' x 25' and it should read 24' x 24' The City Attorney questioned the legal description in the proposed resolution. The Building Official stated that it needed to be corrected to read "Part of Lot 34, ~oehler's Second Addi- tion to Mound and Lot 35, Lynwood Addition to Mound. The City Attorney recommended that the applicant have a survey, make sure the property description is correct and get an updated title opinion so that there are no marketable title problems later. He further stated that the minutes should reflect that this was his recommendation to the applicant and asked that a copy of these minutes be placed in the applicant's property jacket for future reference. The applicant stated he had a title opinion when he purchased the Property in 1976 and requested that he not be required to obtain a survey. · MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to approve the request with the following changes and additions: an 18, setback to the east property line; a certified land survey be submitted; the applicant to provide a corrected property description; and the applicant be encouraged to get an up- dated title opinion so that there are no marketable title problems later. The Council discussed the possibility of title problems. The City Attorney recommended continuing the item for 2 weeks to allow the applicant time to consult an attorney regarding the title problems he would be creating for him- self. The seconder withdrew her second and the maker withdrew his motion. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jessen to continue this this item for two weeks. The vote was unanimously in favor Motion carried. · REQUEST FROM SKIP JOHNSON TO MOVE A HOUSE FROM ONE LOT TO ANOTHER. ISLAND 9~EW DRIVE TO MANCHESTER ROAD. Councilmember Johnson removed himself from the Council' for this item. The Building Official explained the request. The Building Offi- cial explained that the Planning Commission recommended approval 118 July 25, 1989 Mr. & Mrs. Ruud were present and asked that they be allowed to construct the garage 18 feet from the east property line because the ground drops off and they would have to bring in more fill. Mr. Ruud further stated that the proposed resolution says the new garage will be 25' x 25' and it should read 24' x 24'. The City Attorney questioned the legal description in the proposed resolution. The Building Official stated that it needed to be corrected to read "Part of Lot 24, Koehler's Second Addi- tion to Mound and Lot 35, Lynwood Addition to Mound. The City Attorney recommended that the applicant have a survey, make sure the property description is correct and get an updated title opinion so that there are no marketable title problems later. He further stated that the minutes should reflect that this was his recommendation to the applicant and asked that a copy of these minutes be placed in the applicant's property jacket for future reference. The applicant stated he had a title opinion when he purchased the property in 1976 and requested that he not be required to obtain a survey. -MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to approve the request with the following changes and additions: an 18, setbac~ to the east property line; a certified land survey be submitted; the applicant to provide a corrected property description; and the applicant be encouraged to get an up- dated title opinion so that there are no marketable title problems later. The Council discussed the possibility of title problems. The City Attorney recommended continuing the item for 2 weeks to allow the applicant time to consult an attorney regarding the title problems he would be creating for him- self. The seconder withdrew her second and the maker withdrew his motion. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jessen to continue this this item for two weeks. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. REQUEST FROM SKIP JOHNSON TO MOVE A HOUSE FROM ONE LOT TO ANOTHER. ISLAND VIEW DRiVE. TO MANCHESTER ROAD. Councilmember Johnson removed himself from the Council for this item. The Building Official explained the request. The Building Offi- cial explained that the Planning Commission recommended approval 119 July 25, 1989 as the house is in the Same neighborhood as the location to be moved and it aesthetically fits into the area. Bryan Clem, 4436 Manchester objected to the moving of the house because his house and the house on the other side of the proposed vacant lot are worth more structurally than the house to be moved in. He further stated that the house does not fit into his neighborhood. Mr. Clem brought up past considerations of moving homes and stated the Council has denied them in the past. Orv Fenstad, 4366 Wilshire Blvd., questioned Mr. Johnson on his ownership of the house to be moved and stated it was a substan- dard home. Stan Drahos, 5016 Woodridge, stated he has done work in this house and knows it is a nice home. The Council discussed past proposed house movings and stated their reason for not allowing the others was because the houses did not aesthetically fit into the neighborhoods where they were to be located. The Council discussed the procedures followed on notification of surrounding neighbors when a request of this nature arises. .MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to have Mr. Johnson submit an application for the moving of this home; have the Building official do a detailed walk through of the home and report on what needs to be done to bring it up to current building code requirements; refer this item back to the Planning Commission for a public hearing notifying the af- fected neighbors; and then bring it back to the Council for final disposition. The vote was 4 in favor. Motion carried. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT There were none. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE AUDIT AND FINANCIAL REPORT FOR 1988 Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-87 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROVING THE AUDIT ~ND FINANCIAL REPORT FOR 1988 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. FENCE VARIANCE - BEHIND BALBOA BUSINESS CENTER The City Planner explained the request. He further stated that the Zoning Code does not adequately address allowable heights for fences in industrial areas. mend approval. 120 July 25, 1989 The Planning Commission did recom- Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-88 RESOLUTION TO ALLOW TEE DRODOg~D 6, HIOH WOODEN FENCE TO BE ERECTED BEHIND THE BALBOA BUSINESS CENTER (LYNWOOD BLVD.) The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PRESENTATION OF A REPORT ON THE FUTURE UPGRADING OF CITY HALT. FACILITIES AS DEVELOPED BY THE CITIZENS TASK FORCE ON PUBLIC FACILITIES, PAT MEISEL, CHAIRPERSON Pat Meisel presented the report on the future expansion of City Hall that was prepared by the Citizen's Task Force on Public Facilities. City Engineer John Cameron reviewed the existing conditions and proposed expansion and remodeling of City Hall. He reported that the preliminary cost estimate for the total new addition and remodeling project is $886,064.'00. The new addition estimated cost-of $576,576, less the elevator and site work, works out to be approximately $70.00 per square foot. Pat Meisel stated that the Task Force would like to see this acted upon by September of this year so that ground breaking could be in early 1990. The Council discussed holding public hearings and how they would finance this project. They decided to set two public hearings, one August 22nd and one September 12th with tours of the building prior to the hearings. Councilmembers Ahrens, Johnson, and Mayor Smith stated they felt this expansion should be tied to the decision on what to do with the the Lost Lake stock pile site. Councilmembers Jensen and Jessen stated they did not believe this was appropriate. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-89 RESOLUTION OFFICIALLY ACCEPTING THE REPORT FROM THE CITIZEN'S TASK FORCE ON PUBLIC FACILITIES REGARDING THE FUTURE EXPANSION OF CITY HALL The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The Council thanked the Task Force for the time and effort they put forth on studying and reporting to the Council. 121 July 25, 1989 BID AWARD: CURBSIDE COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES The City Manager reported that only one bid was received from BFI. Waste Management submitted a letter stating they could not meet the start up date of September 1, 1989. The bid from BFI was as follows: Bi-monthly - $1.45 per household Weekly - $2.05 per household. They will pick-up on a two day schedule, Mondays and Tuesdays of the first and third weeks of the month. The time frame of the contract will be from September 1, 1989 thru December 31, 1990, with the option of going with weekly pick-up anytime after January 1, 1990. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-90 RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE BID OF BFI FOR THE BI-MONTHLY RECYCLING CURBSIDE PICK- UP AS SUBMITTED The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ESTIMATED GENERAL LEVY FOR 1990 The city Manager explained that in order to comply with the cur- rent Truth in Taxation law, the City must notify the Hennepin County Auditor of an estimated levy by AuguSt 1, 1989. He fur- ther explained that this can be lowered later, but if the City does not notify the Auditor by the August 1st date, it could not levy more than the 1989 levy limit. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-91 RESOLUTION ESTIMATING GENERAL LEVY FOR 1990 TO HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1989 SEAL COAT PROJECT MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to authorize final payment to Allied Blacktop, in the amount of $33,731.58, for the 1989 Seal Coat Project. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 122 July 25, 1989 PAYMENT OF BILLS MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to authorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $143,122.30, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ADD-ON ITEMS BETHEL METHODIST CHURCH Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-92 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING AUGUST 19 & 20 BETHEL UNITED METHODIST DAYS IN THE CITY OF MOUND The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CDBG SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT (CONTRACT $90726) Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: 'RESOLUTION #89-93 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT (CONTRACT ~90726) WITH HEN- NEPIN COUNTY FOR THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. WAIVER OF WAITING PERIOD FOR GAMBLING LICENSE MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to waive the 60 day waiting period for a gambling permit for the Northwest Tonka Lions to operate at the Mound Lanes. The city Clerk will notify the Charitable Gambling Commission of the waiver. The vote was 4 in favor with Johnson abstaining. Motion carried. ANSWER TO REQUEST FOR SIGNAGE INDICATING MOUND ON HIGHWAY The City Manager presented the Minnesota Department of Transportation's answer to Mound's request for signage on Highway 12 near County Road 15 West indicating Mound. They have denied the request. The Council directed the City Manager to explore the signage issue with other cities and then, if agreed to by these cities, contact MN DOT again to see if they would approve the request to place the area cities names on the sign. 123 July 25, 1989 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS': ae Financial Report for June 1989, as prepared by the Finance Director, John Norman. B. Thank you note from Mary Lou & Jetty Philbrook. Ce LMCD Mailings. The Council asked that Tom Reese, L.M.C.D. Representative for Mound be requested to address the Council periodically on items happening with the L.M.C.D. They asked tha~ Mr. Reese report to the Council on September 12, 1989. D. Planning Commission Minutes - July 10, 1989. E. Park Commission Minutes - July 13, 1989. Fe REMINDER: Annual National League of Cities Congress of Cities to be held in Atlanta, Georgia, November 25-29, 1989. Please let Fran know before August 28th if you are inter- ested in attending. (You received this brochure separately.) MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Johnson to adjourn at 11:15 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion .carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk August 8, 1989 RESOLUTION #89- RESOLUTION TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING WITH NO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND TO ALLOW A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOTS 35, LYNWOLD ADDITION TO MOUND, AND PART OF LOT 34, KOEHLER'S SECOND ADDITION TO MOUND PID %14-117-24-43 0045 (2233 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD), P&Z CASE NO 89-831 WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow construction of a detached garage with no designated public-right-of way within 18 feet from the east/front property line and 4 feet from the north/side property line for Lots 35 and Part of Lot 34, Lynwold Addition to Mound, PID #14-117-24-43 0045; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code requires for accessory structures a 10,000 square foot 10t area, 4 foot rear yard setback, 4 foot side yard setbacks, and a 30 foot front yard setback, and W~{EREAS, Section 23 . 404, Subdivision ~8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful, non-- c0nf0 ing residential property when the alterations will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: me The City does hereby authorize the construction of a detached accessory building with no designated public right-of-way with a 10 foot front yard (east side) set- back variance at 2233 Lynwood Boulevard, PID #14-117- 24,43 0045, subject to the following conditions: ae The applicant submit a certified land survey of Part of Lot 34 ONLY on which the proposed detached accessory building will be constructed'. be Consideration for future setbacks on Part of Lot 34 will require variance approval due to the lack of public right-of-way frontage. August 8, 1989 Ce The applicant must supply documentation to the City proving right-of-way access. The Council recommended that the applicant have his title opinion updated. e The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation and authorizes the alteration set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alterations to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. ae To construct a 24' x 24' detached garage 20 feet from the east property line and 4 feet from the north/side property line. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: That part of Lot 34, Koehler's Second Addition to Mound, described as follows: Beginning at a point 14 feet West of the East line 'of said lot and 150 feet South of the North line of said lot; thence West on a line parallel with the North line of said lot 200 feet; thence South on a line parallel with said East line of said lot 85 feet; thence East on a line parallel with the North line of said lot 20 feet more or less to a point which is 14 feet from the East line of said lot and 85 feet South of the point of beginning; thence North to beginning. Also all of Lot 35, "Lynwold Park", Lake Minnetonka. This variance shall be recorded with the County Re- corder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.3595, Subdivision (4). This shall be considered a restric- tion on how this property may be used. August 8, 1989 e The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Attest: City Clerk CITY OF HOUND PART II j UL 2 6 i989 C~se No. Date F i 1 ed ~ Fee $50.00 VARIANCE APPLICATION PLANNING & ZONING COHMIS$ION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of' Subject Property Add i 1: i on / Block PIP No. Day Phone Applicant's Name (if other than owner) Address Existing. Use o~ Property: Day Phone Zoning District Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, co~thional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? yes /(n~. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s) (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in 'any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. 'FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recommendation Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date of ~he Co~ of .......... '.~ennepin ........................................... =~ $~=~ of .......... /~innesota ....................................... , ~...iea ............ I~eanepi~ .................................. arai 8t, o,f,e of .............. ~unes~.ta ........................... D ............ o7 rr~e su, rr~ oI ......... urze ............ 60 ......... ~hem ............... tn. h.a.r~ paix~ by ~h.e. ~o. id. par~t~s of ~ke seconxl; part, gke re. cetpt whereof ts hereby o~kn, ow~. ed[ed, cio ........... hereby Grant, Bar[al.n, Sdl, and Convey ~nt.o the sa~ parties o/ f, ke see. end part as joi.rr~ ~er~r~ts and not as t~raznts tn comravn, thei. r asstins, tl~ sz~rvi, vor o/ said parti, e.s, and f. ke kerfs and asst[r~s of the su, r~,tvor, Forever, aZ~ the ~'aet ...... or paree~ ...... o/ Zan. d Zy£n[ and beth[ in. the County of ............. Hermepin .................................. and S~ate of 3£tnr~e. sota., desertbe, d a.s foU, ows, to-wtt: That part of Lot 34, Koehler's Second Addition to Mound, described as follows: Beginning at a point 1~ feet West of the East line of said lot and 150 feet South of the North line of said lot; thence West on a line parallel with the North line of said lot 200 feet; thence South on a line parallel withosaid East line of said lot~ 85 feet; thence East on a line parallel with said N rth line of said lot 200 feet more or less to a point which is 14 feet from the East line of said lot and 85 feet South of the point of beginning; thence North to beginning. e r i t 6n ~ of record, if any. 'State eed Tax due hereon ~n~o be~n~tn~ or ~ anywi, se appertaining, to the s~ p~r~s of tl~e se~ p~rt, t~tr asst~, t~ s~r- vtvor of sa~ parties, and t~ ]~irs a~ assigns of t~ s~rvLvor, Forever, t~ sa~ p~rttes of the s~o~ part taktn[ as jotn~ tenants and no~ as ~e~n~s t~ common. ~d t~ said ....Vex~o~..3 ...... Exic~o=..a~..S.uz~ko...~....Er.~dks.on,...hus.hand..~nd..~f.e ........................... part ..iez of t~ fi~s~ par~, f or..the~el~ea.,....their ...................... ~irs, e~c~rs and admtnistra~ors ~ ............ ~ve~nt wt~k the s~ part~ of ~he second part, their ~si[~s, ~ s~rvtvor of said par~ies, and t~ ~tvs a~ assigns of the st~tvor, th~t....~hey...are ........ we~g setz~ tn f~ of the lan~ and premises afor~a~ and ha Y.e ..... ~ood rt~t~t to seZ~ a~ convey the s~me i~ ma, nner and for~ ~fo~esaid, and that t~ S~ are free/ron~ aZl ineun~bra~es, except as above stated '~d the above ba7'.~ained and franted lands and premises, tr~ the qwtet and peaceable possession of the said peltries of the second part, their assil]ns, the s~rv~vor of said part~s, and ~he heirs and assi~ of the surv~vov, af~nst al[ persons [awfz, ZZF cZa~mln~ or to c[aL~ the whoZe or anF part ther~f, s~j~ ~ ~umbra~es, if ~ny, hereinbefore mentioned, t~ said parties..of the first part wing ~%rrant an SETTLEMENT STATEMENT U. $. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FORM 1 . REV. 5Z76 B. TYPE OF LOAN: %I PAULTiTLE 1. I'IFNA 2. r'IFmHA 3. ~tCONV. UNINS. 6. P LE NUMBER. I 7. LOAN NUMBER: ~ co.~o. D-25~3, 85099~ VA g, MORTgAge INSURANCE CASE NUMBER: C. NOTE: This fo~m is furnished to give you I ltat~,T~,,I Of iCtUll ~ettlement COSTS. Amounts Fe~d to and by th~ leftist agent ara Shove. -- Itlms marked "(p.o.c.)" we l~li8 OUtside the ClOsing; they Itl ~how~ here for informational purl~oles emi ire not included in the totals. D, NAME OF BORROWER: E. NAME OF SELLER: F. NAME OF LENDER: - James Mark Rumd & Sandra K. Vernon J. & Sumuko M. Eri~kson Shuts on Mortgage O. Pf~OPERT¥ LOCATION: H. SE1-FLEMENT AGENT: L SETTLEMENT GATE: 2233 Lynwood Blvd St. Paul Title Insurance Corporation 0otober ~OlZ~ ~ "PLACE OF S£TTLEMENT: · ' 33 East Wentwo~ Suite West St. Paul, Y~ 55118 ~. SUMMARY OF BORROWER'S TRANSACTION E. SU~MAR~ OF SELLER~ TRANSACTION 100. GROSS AMOUNT DUE FROM 80RROWER: 400. GROSS AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER: 101. Contract sales price ,"~:~t',t~ c)~' 401. Contract sales price 102. Personal property ' 402. Personsl property - ' 103. Settlement charges to borrower (line 1400) ://~,,B.~'/ 403. 104. 404, 105. 405. Ad/usrmen~$ for/~Em~/~eld by seller in advance , A~/us~ent$ for items paid by seller in advance 106. City/town ta~<es to 406. City/town taxes to 107. County taxei to 407. County taxes to 108. A_,__,_~::.~..-~ents to 408. Assessments to 109. 409. GROSS AMOUNT DUE FROM SORROWER ,~ ~,,~p.~/,~ 420. GRO$S AMOUNT OUE TO SELL ER 1~, 500. O 200. AMOUNTS PAID 8Y OR IN BEHALF OF 80RROWER: 500. REDUCTIONS IN AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER: 201. Deposit or earnest money ~00.00 501. Excess deposit (see instructions) 202. Principal amount of new loan(s} -z~ c/~ ~ 502. Settlement charges to seller (line 1400) 'T' 203. Existin$ loan{s) taken subject to ~",-, ..... 503. Existing; loan(s) taken subject to - 204. · '~ ~,~,~ 504. Payoff of first mortgage loan 205. .,CC 4---- '~'/' ~'' 505. Payoff of second motgage loan [, 209. 509. - ....... A d/ustmen ts for items unpaid by seller ;4 d/ustmen ts for items unpaid by seller 210. C~ity/towntaxes to 510. City/town taxes to 211. County taxes to 511. County taxes to 212. Assessments to 512. Assessments to 213. 513. 214. 514. 215. 515. 216. 516. 217. 517. 218. 518. 219. 519. 220. tOtAL PA/o or/FOR ~ORROWER ~ ? ~ ~,j._. ~0. tOtAL REOUCrION AMOUNr OUE SE' ' ER / ,?.00. CASH A T SETTLEMENT FROM/TO SORROWER 600. CASH A T SE TTL EMEN T TO/FROM SELL ER 301. Gross amount due from borrower (line 120) ;~ ~ ;~ X'~.?"~ 601. Gross amount due to seller (line 420) '&~_ ~02. Less amounts paid by/for bOrrower (line 220) ~"~, ~-?,~.~. ~-.~. 602. Less reCJctions in amount due seller (line 520 /",~.' 1,~'~ c, s, =o=ROM eORROw R '/ cASH FROM sELlER PSP.50:3/77 U. $. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FORM 1 . REV.$/76 PAGE 2 SETTLEMENT CHARGES 700. TOTAL SALES/BROKER'S COMMISSION based or~ price Division of Commi~ion {line ZOOI as follows: 702. $-' ...... to ............ ~ 703. Commission paid at S~ttiament 800. ITEMS PA YABLE IN CONNECTION WITH LOAN PAID FROM BORROWER~ FUNDS AT SETTLEMENT PAID FROM SELLER.~ FUNDS AT SETTLEMENT 801. Loan Origination Fee 1 % 802. Loan Discount ? % 803. Appraisal Fee to 804. Credit Repor~ to 805. Lender's Inspection Fee 806. Mortgage Insurance Application Fee to 807. Assumption Fee 808. 809. 810. 811. 900. ITEMS REQUIRED BY LENDER TO 8E PAID IN ADVANCE 901. interest from I 0,--'~I-'77 to 11-I-?'7 @$ 8. ~(~ /day 902. Mortgage Insurance Premium for ' ' months to - 60. O0 7~- oo 903. Hazard Insurance Premium for years to 904. veers to 905. 1000. RESER YES DEPOSITED WITH LENDER · 1001. Hazard insurance 2 months @$ 1 1. I~o"~r month 1002· Mortgage insurance, months @$ per month 1003.City propr property taxes months @$ per month 1004.County property taxes 2 months @$ ~,~ ,~r month 100,5. Annual assessments months @$ per month 1006. months @$ per month 1007. months @$ per month 1008. months @$ per month l ~00. TITLE CHARGES 1101.Settlement or closlng fee to ~.._ 1102. Abstract or title search to ,~+_ 1103.Title examination to 1 l~.Title insurance binder to '-1105.'Document preparation to 11~. Notary f~t to 1107. Attorney's fees to fincludes above item~ numbers; ) 1108.Title insurance to ~, (includes above items number~; 1109. Lender's coverage $ ~ ~ ~ : 1110. Owner's coverage $ 1111. 1112. 1113. 5ri=nO 1200. GOVERNMENT RECORDING AND TRANSFER CHARGES 1201.Recordlng fees: Deed $ -~.~ 1202. City/county tax/stamps ~'Deed $ : Mortgage $ ~,25 ; Releases $ -~ Nth ; Mortgage $ '- _ _ 1203.State tax/stamps: Deed $ 8(~. ~ ; Mortgage $ 5[~,75 1204. 1205. 1300. ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT CHARGES 1301. Survey tO 1302.Pest inspection to 1303. 1304. -- 1305. 1400. TOTAL SETTLEMENT CHARGES (enter on lines 103, Section J and 502, Section K) THE UNDERSIGNED hereb~ acknowledge receipt of a copy of this statement. ,~ ~ SELLER ' ORROWER o.t,: 10"'~1-?? Planning Commission Mtnutes July ]0, ]989 Page Six Case No. 89-83I: .James & Sandra Ruud~ 2233 Lynwood Blvd.~ Lots 35 & part of Lot 34~ Lynwold-Addition to Mound~ PID #14-ll7-24-43 0045. VARIANCE= setback to place an accessory buildinq with no,public right-of-way. The City Planner reviewed the Building Officials recommendation for approval of the request to place a Oetached garage within 20 feet from the east and 4 feet from the north property lines upon the following conditions: l) The City of Mound grant the applicant a permanent driveway easement 14 feet in width across their property separating Lot 35 from part of Lot 34 all the way to Lynwood Blvd. The applicant submit a registered land survey of the parcel located in Part of Lot 34 ONLY on which the proposed detached accessory building will be placed. 3) 4) Consideration for future setbacks on Part of Lot 34 will require variance approval due to the lack of public right- of-way frontage· ~he applicant shall set up an escrow account to pay for the costs of legal, engineering, and administrative fees to draft and record the easement documents. Applicant, James Ruud spoke on his behalf. He informed the Com- mission that since the application was made, he had located the Abstract and it states that from 1914 through 1974 that the property has a right of way on the 14' wide strip. He further stated that he has no problems with condition items 2 and 3, however Feels that items I and 4 is now obsolete. MOTION made by Sohns, seconded by Ciapsaddle to approve staff recommendation for approval, including the follow- ing conditions: l) The applicant submit a registered land survey of Part of Lot 34 ONLY on which the prc~oosed detached ac- cessory building will be placed. 2) Consideration for future setbacks on Part of Lot 34 will require variance approval due to the lack of public right-of-way frontage. 3) The applicant ~,upply documentation to the City proving right-of-way access. MOTION carried unanimously. This case will be heard by the City Council on July 25, 1989. CITY of MOUND CASE NO. 89-831 5341 ~',M~,YWOOD ROA~ MOdND. MINNESOTA 5536,4 (612 472-i '155 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official ~ // DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of Ju%y 10, 1989 CASE.NO: 89-831 APPLICANT: James M. and Sandra K. Ruud IX)CATION: 2233 Lynwood Boulevard LEGAL DISCRIPTION: Lots 35, and Pt. of 34, Lynwold Addition to Mound PID# t4~117-24-43 0045 SUBJECT: Setback to place an accessory building with no Public Right-of-Way F~XISI%NG ZONING: R-1 single family and R-2 single family PROPOSAL: The applicants are proposing to construct a detached accessory building 20 feet from the east and 4 feet from the north on a portion of Part of Lot 34 which is detached land from Lot 35. There is a strip of city-' owned land 16 feet wide along and in front of Part of Lot 34 which has been used by four of the neighbors; however, the neighbors detached buildings are on contiguous land with frontage on public right-of-ways. COb~Z~NTS: The property being considered is in two zoning districts, R-1 and R-2. The setbacks for detached accessory buildings are 30 feet and 20 feet, respectively from the front property lines abutting a public right-of-way, The land to the rear of Lot 35 (west) is one tax parcel with Part of Lot 34, but probably has two deeds. The area has had fill placed fora tocation~f the proposed garage to raise the area above the driving surface. The north side is proposed to be 4 feet from the property line which is a rear yard setback requirement. The more this garage is moved to the south the lower the ground level becomes. RECO~WfENDATION: Staff would recommend approval of the request to place a detached garage (accessory building) within 20 feet from the east and 4 feet from the north property lines upon the following conditions: 1) the City of Mound grant the applicant a permanent driveway easement 14 feet in width across their property separating Lot 35 from Pt. of Lot 3& all the way to Lynwood Blvd. 2) The applicant submit a registered land survey of Part of Lot 34 parcel ONLY on which the proposed detached accessory building will be placed. 3) Consideration for future setbacks on Part of Lot 34 will require variance approval due to the lack of public right-of-way frontage. 4) The applicant shall set up an escrow account to pay for the costs of legal, engineering, and administrative fees to draft and record the easement documents. The abutting neighbors have been notified. ~, ~is case will be referred to the City Council on July 25, 1989. CITY OF HOUND ! ,JLJi~ u' I .... ' '"';'.: PART II Fee $50. O0 VAR I ANCE APPL I CAT I ON PLANN I NG & ZON I NG COMM I SS I ON (Please type or print the t=ol lowing in1=ormation.) Add i t i on A~licant's Name (iq other than o~nec) Block No. /'/-//7- Z q Address Existing. Use o1= Property: Day Phone Zoning District Has an application ever been made 1=or zoning, variance, co~:~Lj~tonal use permit, or other zoning procedure 1=or this property? yes ~Ko ~.~ I1= yes, list date(s) o1= application, action taken, and provide resolution ~umber(s) (Copies o1= previous resolutions must accompany this application.) I certi1=y that al 1 o1= the above statements and the statements contained in any reclutred 'papers or plans to. be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. ! consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this appl ication by any authorized ot=1=iciai o1= the City o1= Mound 1=or the purpose o1= inspecting, or o1= posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may /11111111111111111111,~1~11111111111111111111111111ll/111/1111171111111111 'FOR OFFICE USE ONLYt Pla~ing Co~i~slon Recommendation Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date LRIANCE APPLICATION Case No. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (~) No ( ) If specify each non-conforming use: Do-~he-~e_~_i_s_%ing stru.r_tures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback/¥egulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ~-~, No ( ). If no, specify each non-conforming use: Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any.of the uses permitted in that zonl'ng district? ) too narrow ) too smal 1 ) too shallow / topography ( ) sot 1 drainage ( ) sub-surface shape .( ) other: specify Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property Interests in the land after the zoning ordioance was adopted? Yes (y~), No (). If yes, explain relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ~). If yes, explain VARIANCE APPLICATION Case .o. Are the conditions oF hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~), No ( ). IF no, how m~ny other properties are similarly affected? What is the "'minimum" modification (variance) from the area, bulk, and setback regulations that wi I'1 permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using.maps., site plans, with dimensions and wmit- W i 1 1 grant ing oV the va~ fance be mater i~ i 1 y ~etr i mental t6 p6oper~y i ~ the same zone, or to the enforcement o~ this or~tnance~ PART III SITE PLAN INFORMATION: All supporting documents such as sketch plans~ attachments? etc.~ must be submitted in 8-1/2"xlI" size. IF larger drawings are submitted? one must be 8-1/2"xll"? and 15 larqer size copies must be provided· For each requested zoning variance procedure, a site plan must be attached.at a scale large enough For clarity show- ing the Following information: Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s), building(s), driveway(s)/street access, off-street parking, and utilities· Existing and proposed elevations. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines; principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. Indicate "north" compass direction. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. I i i I I i !. ! .! · >" ELM RD RD ~. m kRT qF LOT $4 I ""'"'~' L'fNWOOD BLVD }4 $5 &? PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER a CONDITIONAL USE PER- MIT FOR A CLASS III RESTAURANT (LIQUOR SERVICE RESTARUANT) I'N THE B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LOCATED AT 445! WIL- SHIRE BLVD., AVALON, LOTS 3 THROUGH !8, BLOCK 117-23-3] 002]. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chamb. ers, 534! May~oocl Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 22, 1989 to consider the issuance of a conditional use permit for a Liquor Service Res- taurant in the B-2 General Business District located at 445! Wi 1- shire Blvd., legal ly described as: Avalon,.Lots 3 through !8, Block 8, PID #19-]17-23-3] 002!. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk "August 7 ]989 & August 14 ]989. Published in, "The Laker, , , CITY of MOUND August 3, 1989 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 5536z, (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSES The City Council asked that I do a random sampling of what other cities insurance requirements are for on-sale liquor licenses. The attached sheet is a list of cities that have been contacted and have responded by sending me copies of their liquor license ordinances. On this sheet are those city's requirements. Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.409, Subdivision 1 reads in part: ....... This subdivision does not prohibit a local unit of govern- ment from requiring higher insurance or bond coverages, or a larger deposit of cash or securities. The minimum requirement for proof of financial responsibility may be given by filing: (1) a certificate that there is in effect for the license period an insurance policy or pool providing at least: $50,000 of coverage because of bodily injury to any one per- son in any one occurrence, $100,000 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, $10,000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any one occurrence, $50,000 for loss of means of support of any one person in any one occurrence, and $100,000 for loss of means of support of two or more persons in any one occurrence; (2) a bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as provided in clause (1); 1 An equal opportund~ Employer that does not d;scriminate on the :zs:s :! r.~.;e :otc" r~atio"~a! or:¢ 2..~' hand~caF. 2, ed status ir~ the admission or access to. or treatme~'t or or (3) a certificate of the state treasurer ~hat the licensee has deposited with the state treasurer $100,000 in cash or securities which may be legally purchased Dy savings banks or for trust funds having a market value of $100,000. This subdivision does not prohibit an insurer from providing the coverage required by this subdivision in combination with other insurance coverage. An annual aggregate policy limit for dram shop insurance of not less that $300,000 per policy year may be included in the policy provisions. Minnesota Statutes 340.412, Subdivision 1, Bond Required reads in part as follows: A local unit of government shall not grant a retail license to sell intoxicating liquor until the applicant has filed a bond with corporate surety, or cash, or United States government bonds in the amount of not less than $3,000 nor more than $5,000 for on-sale licenses, and not less than $1,000 nor more than $3,000 for off-sale licenses. Mound currently requires a $5,000 bond. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 o o 0 o ~o ~ ~ ~o ~0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, August 22, 1989, and Tuesday September 12, 1989, in the City Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 P.M. to consider future expansion of the City Hall facilities. Ail persons wishing to be heard will be heard at that time. In addition to the public hearings on August 22 and Septem- ber 12, there will be open house tours of the existing City Hall on the following days and times: Tuesday, August 15, 1989 - 3:00 P.M. to 4:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. Tuesday, August 22, 1989 - 6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. The public is encourage to attend these open houses. Francene C. Clark, CMC City Clerk Publish in The Laker - August 14, 1989 1 the City of Mound, a Minnesot~ municipal corporation pm~ef~pm-~,~em-__,aa,~ Beverly and Leo ~a11~ ~f~~.~. Ninnesota ~ ~: Lots 1, 2, 3 S 22, Block 5, Drea~ood PlO ~13-11~-2q'12 0223 _.___8_t_h. .................... ~ al._.. A__u g.u_s..t. ........... , -It is specifically understood and agreed by end between '~he parties that the lessees shall only have a right to use the aforedescribed lands and tha~ the on1¥ use that they may put this property to is to plant a garden. The lessees further agrees that they will maintain the site, mowing the grass, cutting the weeds and keeping the site clear of litter during the term of this lease. The only purpose .for which the lessees may use this ground is to plant a vegetable garden, which may not be used as a commerclal garden plot, and there shall be no storage, parking or other use of this property by the lessees. Mayor, City of Mound City Manager, City of Mound APPLICATION FOR CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION 3.2 BEER PERMIT + 2.00 Per day for each additional day. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. Name of Organization ~,~U. ~~ ~~ Address of Organization p, O. ~m~ ~01 t"/le~)/ ¢?~V, 5,~',,~/'~ ~ t / ' ' '~ Organization Title of Person Applying for Permi ~.~~,~Z~e~~, ~-~ Dates Permit Will Be Used: From__~v~ ~ 19..._.~To Address at which Permit will 'be used Does the Organization Carry Liquor Liability Insurance If answer-to No. 7 is YES, please list: (a) Name of Insurance Company --'/IZI.~z~ (b) Amount of Coverage SOO/ If this application to sell 3.2 Beer is on property owned by a public agency other tha.n the City of Mound, w.ritten notice from the public agency giving permission for such sales must accompany this application. (a) Is such written permission attached? If this application is a request to sell 3.2 Beer on City property, the City requires Liquor Liability Insurance with limits of $300,000. Appl i cant __ $25.00/Day - Single Dance $200.O0/yr - Annual Dance Phone No. Work Phone No. ~b'~'. .~~ . Location of Dance Dates of Single Dances Time of Single Dances Yearly Dates on Annual Dance Permit (from when to when) POLICE OFFICER IN ATTENDANCE Section 450:25 It is incumbent upon every licensee to provide for the attendance of police officers, duly approved by the Chief of Police, and in sufficient numbers to maintain peace and order during all times in which a dance or live music concert is being held. PHONE 012-29~.0159 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION 333 SIBLEY · ST. PAUL, MN 55101 APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY (SET-UP) PERMIT r"-"n'",.,, .".""...*:'..0700- UJ¢~_ IF NAME .AN3 ADDRESS SHOWN ARE NOT COJ~REC". MAI<:[: CHANGES IN SPACES BELOW NOTE: ALL CLUB 'ON-SALE' INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSEE'S ARE EXEMPT FROM APPLYING. I FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS: FOR A PRIVATE CLUB Has applicant~ if partnership, any parmer; if corporation, an¥ officer or director; if clubo any club officer or director° ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State Laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details constitutes cluta fo, revocation of th,l[ permit. ANY PERMIT ISSUED HEREUNDER DOES NOT ALLOW THE SALE OF I%T03[ .~ATING LIQUOR. NO CONSIDE RATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION ~//~__ ~:~.~ IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A COUNTY: IF A CLUB A~ACH A COPY OF TH~ CONSTITUTION ANO IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A MUNICIPALITY BYLAWS OF MEMBERS. THE CLUB AND A CURRENT LIST OF CAS~ CHECK BI LLS ...... AUGUST 8, 1989 BATCH 9073 BATCH 9074 47,290.32 105,803.48 TOTAL BILLS 153,093.80 DATE STATU~ ,',..~.,-,u,,~, AND SOIl ~,.m, no,,_,,,,,.,,, TOTAL B¢607 PRE-PAID ~B LTCK~M VENDOR TOTAL C~', PR~-r~!u 7/..,1 ~ 7/3~/~ C]TI ~['~ ~:EDIT ~-~]~ V~N~ TOT~ PRE-PAID 7/o1~ 7/3t/E~ ~-PAID ,'~.:.z/,~ 7/31/~ CITY ~' M~ ~E~: TOTAL ~ ~E-PA!D //ol/,.9 7/31/~ ' ~ ~ CD~CIAL L!~ I~ CO V~NZ~DR TOTAL C1001 F~-PAID 7/31/~ ~ISSIONER OF F.:Et,~-~I]E VEN%~OR TOTAL gi217 ~E-PAID 7/31/89 7/3!/$? D~T RU[LOLPH ~,~.'~!OR TOTAL D1291 ~E-PAID 7/31/89,. 7/31/89 DIV~"SIFIED ARTS CO~A_NY ;~'EIJ]R TOTAL F~£-PAID 7/31/87 7/31/E8 DOHI~'S PIZZA '/E)~OR TOTAL E14~ P~-E-PAID 7/31/89 7/31/89, ;' II [- r !i,',",t" ,.IOU F:IIA L CIT7 OF I..'rJi]lD ~'~OUNT DESOUPTION ~.(X} .~J~C¥CI_E PIO(LP 77,00 JJtE 5~EBAOE-~ i34.00 JR~L-CO 13-) .00 ~.00 CEI~ENT WORK-TUX.LAK£SI[E 590.00 CEMENT WORK-GLENDALE ;4,,.00 dRNL-CD ? ;5.00 =.¢:,_,..vv CR UNION 7/~ PR 2,542.00 ~?il.-CD ~.20 REPLEN P/C-POLICE ~.20 ~NL-CD 24.83 REPt£N P/C--LIQ 24.~3 JRNL-CD 54.03 49.50 1.80 51.o0 LIFE I.~S--7/,.~. PR LIFE INS-RETIREE JRNI.-CD 51 .~} 2,261.57 SIT 7/:~ PR 2,261. ~ ._~'T4L-CD 3;2.00 37.5 COf¢RACT H~f~S 13.20 MILEAGE · ~.20 dR~-CD ~.20 1Z~.O0 T SHIRTS 129.00 ~NL-CD 1~.00 89.. 15 PIZZA-PARK COMM MTG 89.15 dRNL-CD 89,.15 475.~ LIQ 8.64- DISC 466.94 01-4270-4200 1010 7o-7~.d0-4-00 01-4:'?~0-42~ 1010 01 - ~40 - ¢~4~J 1010 O1-.,140-~w 1010 71-71(k%~00 1010 Ol-~40-O0(Q 1010 81-45f~O-3100 81-,t.~O- 3340 1010 01-4140-~q 1010 01-4340-4120 1010 '71-7100-9510 71-7100-9560 1010 s 945.00 ~,~ 2~.4,2.00 296' 24:~ 296; 51.30 2?6 ~61.~ 296 3L~5.20 29.6 466.94 PACE 2 AP-C02-01 PURCHASE dOURNAL CITY OF MOUt;D TIME YENDOR II¢~I~ [~JE HOLD NO, II~',qDICE NMBR [UTE DATE STATUS PRE-PAID 7/.-~1/c,~ ~ ..... ; 7/3!/8'~ A~OL~4T DESCRIPTID~ 194.2 LIQ 180.20 .WINE 5.68- DISC ~,8.72 JR~i-CD 71-7100-~10 71-7100-7520 71-7100-7560 1010 PRE-PAID 3&9.72 ED PHIU_IF~ & SO~ '~NDORTOTAL ~.66 G19C5 F~E-PAID 1,363.00 DEF COMP 7/31/.5'9 7/31/~ 1.~3.00 JRlt_-CD 7/~ PR 01-~40-0000 1010 1363.00 29671 C-REAT W~ST LIFE ASSL~A~'CE ~,~JOR TOTAL 1343.00- G197! PRE-PAID ~J.60 GRP HLTH 7/~ PR 01-2040-~)OO 7/3!I:~ 7/31/6~ ~.,5.60 ~(NL-CD 1010 296~ VE)E1ORTOTAL ~%'35.60 G1972 PRE-PAID 7!31/~ 7/31/8~ F~E-PAID 7/.:,1/'S~ 7/31189. 125.31 MIX 2.51- DISC 3.15 FRT 1~.95 JR~_-CD 518.52 LIQ 12.55- DISC 5.40 FRT 109.~ MIX 620.66 dRNL-CD 71-7100-9540 71-7100-9560 71-71OO-7600 I010 71:71OO-9510 71-7100-9560 71-7100-9600 71-7100-9540 1010 125.~ 620.66 GRIGGS ~ & COMPANY '~-"J~)OR TOTAL 746,61 H2145 PRJE-PAID 473.~ SUPp DE]) 7/22 PR 7/31/89 7/31/,~ 473.99 JRd',IL-CD 01-2040-0000 1010 · 473.99 HENN CO SUPPORT & COLLECT* ~:_)(DOR TOTAL 473.9? I~.,O1 F'RIE-PAID 713!/89 7131189 478.18 ICMA 4.5'7 7/~ PR 478.18 ,JR,-CD 01-2040-0000 1010 478.18 ICMA F"~-TIREMENT TRUST--'5-/ '¢ENIX~ TOTAL i2304 PRE-PAID ?/31/~ 7/21/8x) 478.18 87.25 IG~A 401 87,~ 'JR}L-CD 7/~ PR 01-24-0-0000 10!0 2%7( ICMA RETIF~]'E)(T TRUST-401 ;~4DDR TOTAL 87.25 I~ll PRE-PAID 7/31/8~ 7131/87 117.72 TRAINING BOOKS i17.72 ,.RNL-CD 22-4170-4130 1010 117.72 I~ - OHIO STATE UNIV~IT ~.~I)OR TOTAL 117.72 ~-P. AID 7/31/89 7/31/~ 273,~ PLMB INSP 293,~ JRli.-CD 01-41~-3100 1010 JOHN B~EII'),ER ~ID4DOR TOTAL 825~I PI~E-PAID 293.25 442.00 68 CONIBACT HD. RS 01-4340-3100 P~E 3 AP-C02-O1 ~ TAFFE ?ENI)OR TOTAL PURCHASE CITY DF MOUND 442.00 JOURNAL ACCO~ t~.~ 1010 PRE-PAID 7731/87 7/31/39 F~_-PAID ,. t~,.!87 7/31i~ 1,049.69 LIQ ~.41- DISC 1,413.0,9 ,JPJ~.-CD 1,118.~--~ LIQ 08.39 WIlE ~.31- DI~ 1,~_~. 41 JRJ(_-CD 71-71C<)-~10 71-7100-9520 71-7100-7560 1010 71-7100-9510 71-7100-9~20 71-7100-9560 i010 1413.~ 2~05 1668.41 JO~fNS04t BRq]S WHOLES~E LI* ',~E",DR TOTAL M3090 PRE-PAID 7/31/~ 7/31I~ 1,175.47 MED C 7/,'~ PR, 1. I~.49 JRNL-CD 01-2~)40-0000 1010 11~.49 MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN ;-1ENDO~ TOTAL 1175.49 ~268 PRE -PA I D 1 ~0.05 7131/89. 7/31/~ 140.05 ~BA I~ JR~L -CD 01 1010 MN BD,~-FIT A~SSN ;~qOR TOTAL 140.05 M3401 PRE~,-PAID 2x~3.00 DEl= COMP 7/~ PR 01-2040-0000 7!31/~ 7/31/89 T~8.00 ~NL-CD 1010 MN RETIREMD{T SYSTEli ','El~ TOTAL ~,~. ,00 M~E-PAID 7/31f~ PRE-PAID 7/31/~ 7/31/8? 7/31/89 ~.91 65.91 131.~ 12.60 54.65 12.75 1.95 49.40 8.40 6.50 60.95 66.00 128.~ 40.72 40.73 47.25 2.S~ 1.80 13.25 51.95 PDSTG F~ WATER BILLS POSTG FDR WATER BILLS JRNL-CD REPL POSTG ~ H'EPL POSTG ~ REPL POSTG METE~ REPL POSTG REPL POSTG METER REPL PQSTG METE~ PJEPL POSTG ME'F6R REPL POSTG METER REPL POSTG ~ REPL POSTD METER REPL POSTG METER REPL PgSTG REPL POSTG ~ REPL POSTG ~ REPL POSTG METE~ REPL POSTG ~ETER REPL PgSTG MElE~ dR~.-CD 73-7300-~10 78-7800-~I0 1010 01-~70-3210 01-4020-~10 01-4040-3210 01-40~-3210 01-4090-~10 ~-4170-~10 71-7100-.3210 01-4340-~10 81-4350-~10 01-4190-~10 73-7300-3210 78-7~-~10 01-4140-~10 01-42'~0-C~10 01-4270-3210 01-4090-~]0 01-4320-3210 1010 131 MD]ND POSTMASTER VEN~ TOTAL 731.82 PAGE AP-C02-O1 F~-PAID 7/31/87 7/31!89 M~_rllJAL BENEFIT LIFE tENDOR TOTAL ~950 X-PAID 7/31/87 7/31/87 P E R A ~E~qOR TOTAL P4~.~30 PRE-PAID 7/3t/~ 7/31/89 PHYSICIAt,~ OF MN VENDOR TOTAL P4031 F~-PAID 7131/89 7131189 PHYSICIANS OF MN VF_N[~R TOTAL P4115 PRE-PA ID 7/31/89 7/31/89 PR.,U[8~TIAL I~L~ANCE O?¢PA VEND~ TOTAL Q4171 PRE-PAID 7/3 !/~? Pg£-PAID 7/31189 ,) .J .9 7/3!/8~ 7/31/89 ~JALITY WINE & SPIRITS V~EIO~ TOTAL R4£59 P~IE-PAID 7/31/89 7/31/89 RgBERT E JQHNSON VENDOR TOTAL S4500 PRE-PAID 7/31/~ 7/31/89 STATE BANK OF MOUND VENDOR TOTAL S4511 F,.~. -PAID 7131/87 7/31/89 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT L,~NION VEND[R TOTAL S4630 PRE-PAIl) PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MOUNI) .~2,99 ~2.,~ 6.096,63 6,096.63 609..6.63 6,5~.10 266. O0 6,E~.lO 68'29.10 183.~x5 18,3.~5 1~.65 ~0.00 DES~IPTI~ LTD INS J~4L-CD PERA 7/22 PR JRNL -CD 'PHP 7/~ PR PHP-RETIREE JRNL-CD AUG HOSP-M ~N ~NL-CD SUPP LIFE 7/22 PR JRNL-CD 1,617.60 LiQ lr~,65 WI~E .33.59- DISC 1.693.66 ~ .~L-CD 1,7~.74 LIQ ~8..50 WINE 41.31- DISC 2,~0,93 ~NL-CD 3984.59 530.20 .530.20 530.20 10,213.13 10,213.13 10213,13 4~,33 498,33 498.33 10,24 8,07 10.60 55 CONTRACT HOL~E'S JRNL-CD FIT 7/22 PR ,.Fr(NL-CD CR ~ION 7/~ PR JRNL-CD 01-2040-0000 1010 01-204~-0000 1010 01-2040-0000 01-41~-1510 I010. 01-4140-1510 1010 01-~40-0000 1010 71-7100-9510 71-7100-~ 71-7100-9.56Q 1010 71-7100-~510 71-71~-~ 71-7100-560 1010 01-4340-3100 1010 01-2040-0000 1010 01-2040-0000 I010 73-7300-2210 01-4280-~10 01-4290-2210 PRE-PAID AMOUNT 552.99 6096.63 6829. I0 183.b5 16~.66 5.~,20 10213,13 '498,2 CHECK, 2%7.~ 2~667 2965.~ 296~ 2966~ ~67, PAGE 5 AP-C02-O 1 NO, INVOICE ~ DATE DATE STAI'U~ SLPE~J~ERI CA Z6146 7/31/87 7~1/~ VEh~!)C~, TOTAL PRE-PAID 7/31/87 7/31/~ '~FDOR TOTAL TOTAL ALL ~ PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MDUND 9'~.97 ~ GASOLINE ~S.24 dU~E OASOLI~E 7.08 BATTERIES .38.14 JU~E GASOLINE 1,121.34 JRNL-CD 1121.34 9.00 REFUND-DOG LIC PD TWICE 9.00 JRI,L-CD 9.00 47,~0.~ ACCO~ NUIIER O1 ~-4170-~10 01-4040-220(~ 01-41~-~10 1010 PRE -PA I D 1121.34 01-~-0000 1010 ' 9.00 .) AP -C02 (d ~qCQMP A03';O At,q2-~ORPAPER B0590 8103/87 8/03/8? ~'4DDR TOTAL 8/O3/8? 8/03/89 ',ENDOR TOTAL 8/03/89. 8/03/89. BdORKS COUNTRY STONE VENDOR TOTAL C0870 8/03/89 8/03/89 CHAPINPUBLISHING CO VENI~RTOTAL CITY DF L~ CO?~ CITY DF MOU~.~ 8/O3/8? 8/O3/8? ~4DOR TOTAL 8/O3/89 8/03/$S VENDOR TOTAL 8/O3/8? 8/O3/89 COCA COLA BOTTLINC-MI[mWEST VE~BOR TOTAL ClllO CROWN A~FFD INC I)1200 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO DI~O 8/O3/8? 8/03/89 VENDOR TOTAL 8/O3/8? 8/O3/8? VENDOR TDTAL 8/03/89 8/03/8? DONALD BRYCE ~ENDOR TOTAL D1360 8/O3/89 8/03!87 ~420 [~CI;F,S[ JOURI(AL CITY DF ~IOL~U} AMOUNI' DESCRIPTION 50.77 RESOL TEST CHART-MICROFILM 50.77 297.92 XEROX PAPER 297.92 JRI~.-CD 29.7.92 1,4.93.6.5 REPAIR WALLS 1,493.6.5 dRNL-CD 1483.65 18.70 BID AD 18.90 JRNL-CD 18.90 20,00 USER GROUP DUES ~.00 JRNL-CD 15.24 ~TER BILL-LIO 15.24 JgNL-CD 15.24 $13.55 JULY )IIX 513.55 3R~L-CD 513.55 19.94 WAX,SOAP 19.94 JR)i.-CD 19 4,252.73 JULY BEER 4,252.73 JRNL-CD 4252.73 417.00 JJLY CHIEF SALARY 417.00 ~,17.00 1,140.00 ASPHALT RE?AIR 1,140.00 JR)~.-CI) 1140.00 9,469.95 dULY BEER 01-40~-4260 1010 01-~$%20-21c×) 1010 01-4280-4200 1010 01-4270-,~10 1010 01-40~-2100 1010 71-7100-3740 I010 71-7100-~0 1010 01-4270-."~7~ 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 22-4170-1370 1010 73-7300-4200 1010 71-7100-~-,30 rIME PRE-PAID r-,'~DU~I' CHECK! Pt~3E 2 A~-C02-Oi 8/03189 8/03/89 PURCHASE CITY OF MOL~4D A~qOUNT DE~I]~IPTIOlt 469.~ JRNL-CD JOURNAL 1010 ~-PAID EAST SIDE BEVERAGE TOTAL 8/03/8? 8/03/8'? 9;69,95 22.51 KFG EIP 6.54 SUPPLIES 17.82 MILEAGE 46,87 JRNL-CD 01-4040-4120 01-4.0~0-4100 O1-4040-2340 1010 E~n~AV~PJ) SHI.BO_E ~ENDOR TOTAL 46.87 F15~) 8/03/8?, 8103/o'"9 473.09 FLUORIDE 473.09 JI~4.-CD 73-7300-~A 1010 F'~-ORI~CSNT~S TOTAL 473.09 F1561 8/03/89 8/03/~ 28.00 FIRE CHIEF SUBSCRIPTION 28.00 J~L-CD 22-4170-412 1010 FIRE CHIEF ' ~ENDOR TOTAL 28.00 F16~} 8/03/89 8/03/89 FEtR ST~ ~ B_PPLY t~_~_.. TOTAL ~0.82 1~.82 176.64 176.64. dULY MIX JULY MISC ~Kni4L-CD 71-7100-~4.0 71-7100-95~0 1010 F1710 8/03189 8/03/6'9 ~,"ENI)DR TOTAL 30.04 ELECTION MTGS ~5.00 GLASSES REIMB E~.04 ~NL-CD 01-4060-4120 01-4040-3140 1010 G1870 8/03/~ 8/03/~ 258.33 JdL¥ MARSHALL SALARY 2~g.33 dRNL-CD 22-4170-1370 1010 GERALD BABB ~,qENI)DR, TOTAL ~8.33 G1930 8103/89 8103/89 3gO.O0 SOBRIETY PROCED-~'UAX,~ 380.00 JRNL-CD 01-41~-4110 1010 GOVT TRAINING SE~YICES H2160 TOTAL 8/03/8~ 8/03/8~ V'ENDDR TOTAL- 8/03/89 8/O3/89 2,754.50 2,754.50 2754.50 15.00 15.00 IAPMD MTG JR~.-C~ 01-4110-4~ 1010 01-4190-41~ I010 TOTAL 15.00 8/O3/89 8/03/8~ 6.87 6.87 MILEAGE JR~.-CD 71-7100-~X)0 1010 PAGE 3 AP-~02-01 E2&Sl KAR PRODUCTS K2720 LEAGUE DF MN CITIES L2920 8/O3/89 8/03~9 ',q~OOR TOTAL 8/O3/89 8/03/~ ~,~EI'~OR TOTAL 8/03/89 8/03/89, VENrDOR TOTAL 8/03/89 8/03/39 6,87 42.31 42.31 42.31 23.52 23.52 ~,52 7.20 7.20 LONO LAKE FORI) TRACTOR VENI)OR TOTAL 7.20 1~3030 7,888.65 8/03/89 8/03./8~ ?,q,RK Vii DISTRIBUTOR '~I~,~'["'.DR TOTAL7~8.&5 8!03/89 8103/89 VENDOR TOTAL PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MDUNI) M~N~TIN'S NAVAP~UE 66 M3150 8/O3/89 8/O3/89 ',qEXEK)R TOTAL B/o3/8~ METRO FONE COM)~JNICATIONS ',q~ TOTAL ,) ) 8/O3/89 8/0~/89 I'ETRD CLINIC OF CDIJNSELI~ VE)ilX)R TDTAL 1,398.12 1,398.12 1398.12 45.80 45.8O 45.80 48.45 32.30 80.75 209.95 16.15 96.90 16.15 48.45 32.30 32.30 613.70 613.70 DESCRIPTION [.MC DUES ~RNL-CD KNIFE JRM. -CD JULY BEER JRt4.-CD FEES-TIF ~ JRNL-CD TOWING JRNL-CD METRO METRO METRO METRO METRO METRO METRO ~'TRO METRO CLINIC CONTRACT 89-90 CLINIC CDNTRACT 89-90 CLINIC CONTRACT 89-90 CLINIC 03NTIUqCT B9-90 CLINIC CONTRACT 89-90 CLINIC CDNTRACT 89-90 CLINIC CONTRACT 89-90 CLINIC CaNTRACT 89-90 CLINIC CONTRACT 89-90 Itq'RO CLINIC CONTRACT 89-90 dR~(.-CO ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4290-2310 1010 01-4340-2310 I010 01-4020-4130 1010 01-4340-2310 1010 7117100-~u30 1010 54-,%00-61~ lOlO 01-4140-4240 1010 01-4140-3<)50 1010 01-4040-3100 01-4190-3100 01-4(Y90-3100 01-4140-3100 01-4340-3100 01-4280-3100 01-4290-3100 73-7300-3100 78-7800-3100 .71-7100-3100 I010 PRE-PAID Ai~ TIlE O-ECK I -) PAGE 4 AP-C02-0! ~3165 8/03/8g 8/03,'8'~ I'E'rRO ~ECItqNICAL CONTP-,~TO 'W_NBOR TOTAL. ~t3170 8/03/8~ 8/03/G'~ I~'TRO W~I'E ~ CII~?~I* V'ENI~'JR TOTAL MID-CENTRAL, INC MS~271 ~490 8/03/8? 8/03/89 VENI)OR TOTAL 8/03/8~ 8/03/1~ ~ TOTAL. 8/03/8? 8/O3/89 ~U~O FIR DEP~ VEM)OR TOTAL 8/03/89 8/03/89 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ~ ~ TOT~ ~10 S/03/~ ~ ~I~ ~INIC ~ NEW~AN SIGNS P4000 PEPSI-CDLA CO.ANY P4060 PDG~EB~ DISTRII~ZTI~ CO P409~ 8103189 8/0318~ VENIX]R TOTAL 81O3189 8103/139 ',,'El'~)O~ TOTAL 8/03/8g 8/03/89 VEI~OR TOTAL PURCHASE JOURNAL CHI OF lqL'~8) A~ DE~CRIPTIDN ACCDUNT NU~ 9,060.00 FURNACE I~EPLACE]"~ENT 22-4170-5000 9,060.00 ~RNL-CD 1010 ?060,00 31,56%05 AUG SEWER SE~WiCE 78-7800-42"~ 12,294.96- AUG SEWER SERVICE 78-11~0-(X'.~ 615.86- AUG SEWER SERVICE 78-3812--00(K) 18,~,8.~ J~.'CD 1010 1~58.23 ' 78,00 BDOTS 328.00 HOSE 73-7300-22.00 4~6.00 JR~.-CD 1010 006.00 26.65 CELLULAR TELE-P13L 01-414~-3~ 26.65 J~-CI) 1010 26.65 4,~.75 JLM. Y SALARIES 22-4170-1390 1,000.00 JULY MAINT 22-4170-31~0 &94.00 ~,il_I BILLS 22-4!70-13~, $,$72.75 ' J~.-~D 1010 M72.75 4,871.83 ~,871.83 J~NI.-ED 1010 4871.83 341.00 PH¥$ I C. AL$-~ I [Ill'i, I~KER 22-4170-3140 341.00 JI~t.-~D 1010 341 467.65 ,JF~-~B 1010 ~?.&~ 357.35 J,l.¥ Mil 71-7100-9540 357.35 3,221.65 ,11.¥ ~ 71-7100-7530 3,221.65 ,.~L-~I) I010 3224.&5 ~35. O0 ~,BIIP~I I ON-5b'~ 01-4377-4100 PFUE-PAID PAGE 5 AP-C02-O1 PRACTICAL MGMT CONCEPTS R4209 RY-,NI)Y' S SANITATION R4240 RED-RAJ ~S R4241 VENDOR TDTAL 8/03/8? 8/03/89 VE)4DOR TOTAL 8/03189 8/03/8~ VENDOR TOTAL .) 8/03/89 8/03/89 REYNOLDS AND REYNOLDS VENDOR TOTAL R42'80 RONALD MARSCHKE Rq290 RDN'S ICE COMPANY SEARS S4370 SH~RE S4379 8/0:3/~ 8/03/89 VEN[~ TOTAL 8/03/~ 8/O3/89 ','~4DOR TOTAL 8/03/89 8/03/8~ VENI)OR TOTAL 8/03/89 8/03/,~ ~'NI)OR TOTAL 8/03/8~ 8/03/8~ S~-ERATDN MI[a~AY-ST PALL VENDOR TOTAL S4580 ,) 8/0:3/8~ 8/03/89 STEIU~ ELECTRIC CO VE)EDR TOTAL S4&42 8/03/~ 8/03/~ PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MOU~ A~OUNT DESCRIPTI~ ?5.00 73.00 JLLY GARBAGE 73.00 JR~_-CD 311.00 KJENI~EL FEES 311.00 311.00 142.64 FILING ENVELOPES 71.32 FILING ENVELOPES 3~,66 FILING EN~,q~.OPES 3~.66 FILING E]W1EI. OPES 2'85. ~ dTUi_-CD 200.00 JULY ASST ~I~ ~Y 200.00 ,.IRNL-CD 747.45 ~U.Y ICE 747.45 ~}4_-CD 7~7.45 19.~ WFUENC'H 19.97 WRENCH ~.~ ~-~ 39.95 77.85 9-10-11 HOSP-KDPP 77.85 9-10-11 HOSP-STUTSMAN IS5.70 dRNL-CD 1~5,70 2~.~ LO~I~-SCHOOL-STRONG 2~.~ 240.38 159,87 REPLACE BALLASTS 159.87 dR~_-CD 159.87 778.~ HE]~VICEI~{EI.L7 778.~ dR~_-~ 1010 01-4320-3750 1010 01-4140-4270 1010 01-4140-2100 01-4090-2100 73-7300-21O0 78-7800-2100 I010 22r4170-1370 1010 71-7100-9540 IplO 01-4270-5000 78-7800-2300 1010 01-4040-1510 01-41~0-1510 1010 01-4040-4110 1010 71-7100-3820 1010 73-7300-42~X) 1010 PRE-PAID A~ PAGE PURCHASE CITY DF MOUND JOURNAL i) SYS~ S'Et"VI~ COMPANY ~ TOTAL T4710 8/O3/8~ 8/03/8V I'F_AuM LAEK)RATORY D-EIIICALS VE]qIX]R TOTAL T4716 ~IES TI] ~ T4770 81O318? 8/03/~ VENDOR TOTAL 8103/89 8/03/8? ~ DIS'FRII)LrFING CD VE)C.K]R TOTAL T4980 8/03/~ 8/03/8? TWIN CITY HO~ JUICE CO VENDOR TOTAL V & S ~FF,:S ' 8/03/q~ 8/03/8~ VE~iDOR TOTAL 8/03/89 8/03/89 VA241'KIqEN-~Z~-~I)~ VE)8)DR TOTAL 8/03/89 8/03/89 ~TET~ PR1][YdCTS C;D~I~Y ~$ ~T~ ~ESIlNCA SA,'~ITATIDN 8/O3/89 8/03/89 VEN]]3R TOTAL WII)~Ei~ I~ W5689 8/03/89 8/O3/89 VENI~ TOTAL VENDOR TOTAL 778.8~ 191.96 HAh"D ~ 191.96 ,J~&.-CD 191.96 85.00 10 CONTPd~W~T ~ ~.00. JR~IL-CI) 11,~.~ JULY BEIER 11,833.75 ~-CD 118L~.75 60.28 JJLY MIX 65.3'9 PLAQUE-PHI LIeU]OK 65.3'9, JRNL-CD 3'25.00 JL~E-COII~REH ~ 1,?.65.00 J. NE PLAN CONSULT 1,690.00 J~.-CO 1690.00 261.40 PENTAC-ON KEYS,~S 261.40 JR~.-CD 261.40 140.00 dilLY GARt~-,GE 140.00 · J~U~L-CD 140.00 890.00 Q.RB VALVE/M HOLES 260.00 GP,,ANgVI~-HTI) 557.00 ~ 1,207.00 JRNL-CI) 1207.00' 4b'7.~ dULY PDRT-O-LEI'S 4b-7. S8 ,.~-CD 4b'7.S8 01-4290-2250 I010 01-4270-1300 1010 71-7100-~ 1010 71-7100-9540 1010 01-4020-2200 I010 16-5894-31~ 01-4190-3100 1010 73-7300-2300 1010 01-4340-3750 1010 78-7800-38~)0 73-7300-3800 73-7300-3800 1010 *01-4340-3900 1010 -) J) PAGE 7 ~-C02-01 8/03/8~ 8/03/89 WURST-PEARSON-~ ~ TOTAL' Xb'750 XEROX ~TIDN 8/03/~ 8/03/8V VENIX]R TDTAL TOTAL ALL VENIEIRS PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MOU~ 4~87.00 164.99 50.71 5.57 6.06 227.24 227.24 I)Ei~ZRIPTIDN 2 QTR LEGAL-COBBLESTOE '2 9TR LEGAL-CiYI{"ERCE PL 2 9TR LEGAL-LANGIXXN VIEW 2 OTR LEGAL-SINCLAIR CT 2 QTR LEGAL- 2 QTR LECVV.-FINCH 2 QTR LEGAL-I)ENBIGH 2 QTR LEC~qL-~RA AU8 RETAINER PRINC-5600 PRINC-IOI2 INT-56(X) INT-IO12 ,.F~-CI) 105,803.48 01-2300-0~62 01-2300-0928 01-2300-0972 01-4190-3100 01-4110-3100 01-2300-0969 01-4280-3100 64-5600-3100 01-4110-3100 1010 01-4320-5000 01-4320-$000 01-4320-6110 01-4320-61 I0 lOIO PRE-PAIl) AMOLWT DATE TIME CITY of MOUND MEMORANDUM 5341 MAYW©OD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 5536z f612¢ 472-1155 DATE: August l, t989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff Jan Bertrand, Building Official 0 ~ July 1989 Monthly Report ' STAFFING During the month of July we had 20 working days, I holiday, and I received 'three bays of vacation and 1/2 day sick leave. Peggy James took two days of sick leave and 4 days of vacation in July. The Inspection/ Planning Department had two Planning Commission meetings on July lOth and July 24th. I attended two City Council meetings on July llth and July 25th. Peggy James attended one Park Commission meeting on July 13th and two Planning Commission Meetings. INSPECTIONS The fol lowing inspections were conducted during the month of July: Site Inspections 32 Footing Inspections 21 Framing Inspections 6 '.Insulation Inspections 3 Drywall Inspections 5 Final Inspections 13 Progress Inspections 5 Erosion/Grading Inspections 2 House Moving/Demolition ~Heating Inspections 7 Plumbing inspections 3 Fire Sprinklers/Fire CbOe 3 Complaints TOTAL 117 The above list does not include i6 inspections made by the sub- stitute inspector. July 1989 Monthly Report Planning & Inspections Page Two REPORTS AND PLAN REVIEWS There were 4 plan reviews completed during July. The monthly report For June was submitted to the City Manager. Reports were submitted to the Planning Commission, City Council, normal cor- respondence, and inspection notices. There were II complaint notices sent out during the month of July. PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission forwarded two variances, three minor sub- divisions, and one house moving reouest for Final consideration to the City Council. The Planning Commission training meeting of July 24th reviewed the Shoreline Management Plan From the LMCD as well as a consensus of the Planning Commissioners of what should be the content of report to the City Council on a possible hous- ing maintenance ordinance. LEGAL STATUS During July a formal complaint was signed at the Hennepin County Court .Services for t~e property at 6t95 Sinclair Rca0. Six cita- tions were issued as well as one warning tag For exterior storage violations. The City Attorney reviewed the status of several pending cases before the courts during the month. An amendment was made by the City Prosecutor on the prosecution For the viola- tions at 5012 Tuxedo Blvd. TRAINING/MEETINGS I attended the City Council meetings, as well as one Planning Commission meeting during the month. I attended the regular staff meeting. The mechanical inspectors met for a luncheon meeting at Medina to discuss Lennox Furnaces as well as backFlow prevention devices. I had several meetings during the month of duly with the contractor, as well as members of the Masonic Lodge discussing the rebuilding of their facility. The City Planner had several site inspections with me as well as the City Engineer to discuss zoning requests and the development of several con- struction sites at Mound, respectively. I met with Jerry Babb, Fire Marshal, to discuss the installation of tanks For diesel Fuel at Contel which will be used for their emergency generator. Also, the removal of the tanks From the marina at Chapman Place and the rental area of the Community Cen- ter to the Life Christian Center. July 1989 Monthly Report Planning & Inspections Page Three CITY EOUIPMENT & PURCHASES The City vehicle required the normal gasoline fills during the month, and the muffler was replaced on July 26th. ! purchase~ Film during the month. STATISTICS OF ACTIVITIES The total number of building permits issued in the month of duly was 31 with a total valuation of $606,030. The valuation Figures are attached on the building activity report For July. In addition, Peggy has arranged appointments for the inspection of buildings, and plumbing. She has prepared the Planning Com- mission agenda and minutes, the Park Commission agenda and minutes, issued building, plumbing and heating permits, and typed dorrespondence for the Buflding Official and Park Director. She has compiled month-end reports for building activities, Sewer Availability Charge, and U.S. Census Report (and she was greatly missed during her vacation the first week in July). * Site 'inspections include the review of the Planning Commis- sion requests and requirements, site inspections for fiooo plain verification, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance notices, review status of various sites For the city prosecutor, preconstruction meetings at the site for building permit applica- tions or realtors, Fire damage and periodic commercial inspection updates. ** The heating inspections during the construction of a project are included under the framing and Final inspection of the build- ing. The heating installations mentioned are for separate equip- ment being placed in homes and businesses. NOTE: Foiled again: just about the time you find a suitable pet for your teenager, you discover there is a City Ordinance against alligators. M. Huffman NEW RE$1DENTtJd. CONSTRUCTION (FatalM CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN · U~Na ~"nvrr~ ~o~r ~.,~o~ JULY ' wY 1989 230,739 789,002 126,500 2,517,405 Total NO~' Ralldonltll RESIDENTIAL ADDITION~ AND ALTERATIONS Total NON-RESIDENTIAL ADO~- TIONS & ALTERATIONS Total N o~',- Ralk~l nlill 'TOTAL MONTH AND YEAR TO DATE CONVERSIONS DEMOLITIONS PERMITS. INSPECTIONS, tions fence TOTAL 606,030 CITY ()f MOUND July 31, 1989 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: July's Activity Report This month's shop activities included the fell'owing: POLICE - 840 battery and service - 841 battery and service - 843 headlight, power window switch and service - 844 2 tires and service - 845 brakes and service - 846 service - 60 A/C charge and tail light STREETS - #13 flat tire - '80 Elgin main broom and service - '89 Elgin main broom and service - #5 heat control cable and flasher - Roller trailer 4 new tir~s - Air compressor filter/regulator/lubricator assembly WATER AND SEWER - #3 starter - #16 tune up - Jet machine- radiator repair - #15 tuneup PARKS - battery for the jeep An equal oppnrtunq,' Employer real does riel discriminate on the bas~s of ra,,e, c:}!¢r, nahpr',: ...... ' ~ ..... , * :: t'~: in ,,he admission or access to. or treatment or employmen: in. dr, pfoc;rilt~': ,ir '. t. ' .' BUILDING INSPECTION - #19 exhaust LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Len Harrell Monthly Report for July, 1989 STATISTICS The police department responded to 923 calls for serv- ice during the month of July. There were 54 Part I of- fenses reported. Those offenses included 5 criminal sexual conduct, 4 burglaries, and 45 larcenies. There were 73 Part II offenses reported. Those of- fenses included 1 child abuse/neglect, 17 criminal damage to property, 2 weapons violations, 3 narcotics- violations, 2 liquor law violations, 7 DWI's, 6 simple assaults, 7 domestics, (2 with assaults), 5 harass- ment, 5 runaway, and 18 other offenses. The patrol division issued 271 adult citations and 16 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 79 citations. Warnings were issued to 47 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 16 crosswalk citations issued. There was five adult felony arrests and two juvenile. Twenty-five adults were arrested for misdemeanors and ten juveniles. Twenty-two adults arrested on warrants. The department assisted in 5 vehiclular accidents with two personal injuries. There were 34 medical emer- gencies and 126 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 17 occasions in July and requested assistance 14 times. Property valued at $16,304 was stolen during the month; $1,284 was recovered. 1 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JULY, 1989 II. III. IV. INVESTIGATION Investigators worked on 3 criminal sexual conduct cases and 2 child protection matters during the month of July. Two cases of neglect were investigated and these 7 cases required an excess of 40 hours of investigative time. Other cases investigated included 2 deprivation of parental rights issues, an indecent conduct, 3 as- saults, 2 domestics, 3 burglaries, 11 thefts, 2 nar- cotics cases, a personal injury accident, and a liquor license investigation. Formal complaints were issued in cases for careless driving, child neglect, 4 gross misdemeanor DWI's, criminal damage to propertY and discharge of a weapon, and.violation of a conditional use permit. PERSONNEL/STAFFING The department settled down during the month of July and overtime was held in check. Ten hours were used in a narcotics situation while serving a warrant. One shift of overtime was used to fill in for an officer illness. Additionally, six hours of overtime was ex- pended in investigation. TRAINING Officers were involved in firearms training in July using both the service weapon and shotgun. I attended a conference sponsored by the Southern Police Institute and received training in the areas of conflict resolution and media relations, issues in per- sonnel management, and personality profiling for managers. RESERVES The reserves donated 225 hours to the department and community in July. Eighty-two of those hours were in assisting with the Incredible Festival. OFFENSES REPORTED CLEARED UNFOUNDED JULYt 1989 EXCEPT. CLEARED CLEARED BY ARREST PART I CRIMES Homicide 0 0 0 0 Criminal Sexual Conduct 5 0 0 0 Rob~ry 0 0 0 0 Aggravated Assault 0 0 0 0 Burglary 4 0 0 0 Larceny 45 2 1 4 Vehicle Theft 0 0 0 0 Arson 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 54 2 1 4 PART II CRIMES Child Abuse/Neglect 1 0 0 1 Forgery/NSF Checks 0 0 0 0 Criminal Damage to Property 17 0 1 1 WeaDens 2 0 0 2 Narcotics 3 0 0 3 Liquor Laws 2 0 0 4 DWi 7 0 0 7 Simple Assault 6 0 3 0 Domestic Assault 5 0 1 3 Domestic (No AssauLt) 2 0 0 0 Harassment 5 0 1 0 Runaway/Incorrigibility/Truancy 5 0 1 2 Public Peace 3 0 0 0 ALL Other Offenses 15 0 1 5 TOTAL T5 0 8 28 PART III & PART IV Property Damage Accidents 3 Persona[ Injury Accidents 2 Fatal Accidents 0 Medicats 34 Anima[ Comptaints 126 Mutual Aid 17 Other Genera[ Investigations 610 TOTAL 7~2 Hennepin County Child Protection 4 CHIPS 0 TOTAL 923 32 ARRESTED ADULT JUVENILE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 5 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 2 25 10 30 12 MOUND POLICE DEPARTHENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT JULY, 1989 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS MONTH Hazardous Citations 194 Non-Hazardous Citations 65 Hazardous Warnings 6 Non-Hazardous Warnings 10 Verbal Warnings 131 Parking Citations 79 DWI 7 Over .10 4 Property Damage Accidents 3 Personal Injury Accidents 2 Fatal Accidents 0 '.Adult Felony Arrests 7 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests .45 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 12 Juvenile Felony Arrests 2 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 10 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 5 Part- I Offenses 54 Part II Offenses 73 Medicals 34 Animal Complaints 126 Other Public Contacts 610 YEAR TO DATE 8O2 2O5 103 192 815 399 35 2O 62 18 0 25 190 42 16 25 11 177 364 173 665 3,926 LAST YEAR TO DATE 789 383 223 464 777 357 58 3O 72 19 0 24 158 67 46 38 30 215 474 131 677 3,341 TOTAL 1,479 Assists 61 Follow-Ups 21 Henn. County Child Protection 4 Mutual Aid Given 17 Mutual Aid Requested 14 8,265 370 189 29 116 62 8,373 342 270 40 84 MOUND I:~OLICE DEPi~R~ MONTHLY REPORT JULY, 1989 CITATIONS DWI More than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired, or No Plates Illegal Passing Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Derelict Autos Seat Belt Miscellaneous Tags TOTAL ADULT 7 4 2 6 1 144 3 20 0 8 26 4 0 0 79 16 2 0 19 6 35O JUV 0 0 3 0 0 7 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 1 16 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JULY, 1989 WARNINGS No Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt ..MiscellaneOus TOTAL ARRESTS Warrant Arrests ~DULT 2 6 21 0 2 11 0 1 43 22 JUV 1 2 1 0 0 0 " 0 0 4 0 MONTHLY PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMMARY JULY, 1989 STOLEN Bikes Snowmobiles Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. Jewelry & Precious Metals Guns Home Furnishings Radio & Electronic Equipment Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment Miscellaneous TOTAL $ 705 0 3,000 35 332 450 2,200 0 2,826 310 6,446 $16,304 RECOVERED $ 100 0 50O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 684 $ 1,284 MOUND POLICE MONTHLY HOURS JULY, 1989 RESERVES BADGE # 5 6 11 10 14 16 17 19 57. 12 28 56 DETAILS EMER RES. C/O SQUAD 3.0 12.0 6.0 COMM SERV 6.0 19.5 6.5 23.5 3.0 23.5 H/F BALL TRAIN ING INSTR TION RIDE ALONG 17.0 41 .5 4.5 17.0 5.5 ADMIN 20.0 1.5 MEET ING TOTAL 1 .5 59.5 0 1 .5 21 .0 1 .5 47.5 1 .5 1 .5 1 .5 1 .5 1 .5 1 .5 - 0 1.5 .- 1.5 1 .5 8.0 1 .5 29.5 1 .5 20.0 1.5 - ~ 1 .5 2, TOTAL 3.0 18.0 82.0 0 0 0 85.5 21.5 15.0 225.00 ACTIVITIES THIS MONTH Reserve Meeting 2 Transports Incredible Festival OFFICERS RS Nelson R16 Hawks R6 Niccum R17 Kohman RIO Swanson R22 FLeming Rll Romain R23 Vogel R12 Shell R28 Geyen R57 Fox, J R58 Fox, K OFFICER Butch Hawks Ruth Vogel Dan Niccum Steve Kohman Sherry Svoboda Dave Ne[son John Romain Jeff Fleming Makfko Swanson Tom Geyen Jim Fox Damion She[[ TOTALS OFFICERS IN TRAINING Katie Fox MOUND POLICE RESERVES SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS JULY~ 1989 DEPOSIT 0 6.50 0 0 0 19.50 6.50 0 0 0 6.50 6.50 $ 45.50 BALANCE S336.50 466.00 277.50 104.00 117.00 168.00 110.00 6 50 650 6 5O 6 50 13 O0 $1618 O0 Prepared by David Ne[son DN/sh 2 ~UN:31-JUL-89 )FF01 >RIMARY ISN'S OelLY? NO DISPOSITION CODES: ALL ACTIVITY COOES: ALL GRID: ALL INSTALL. AT]ON NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT er t I ill E#FORS OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSIT]I~ 06/:~6/89 THRU 07/25/89 PAGE 1 ~CT]V]TY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL )ESCRIPT]ON REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED t5007 1 kSLT-5 UNKNOWN ACT-UNK ~EAPON-POLICE k5343 1 ASLT 5-]NFLT BODILY NARM-OTH ~EAP-ADLT-STR A5351 5 ASLT 5-]NFL]CTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM A5355 2 ASLT 5-INFLiCTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ A5502 1 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK ~EAP-ADLT-ACQ A8603 1 ASLT-COERCION-MS-THREAT DMGE PROP-ADLT-STR ~234' 1 BURG 1-OCt REs NO FRC-D-UN VEAP-COM THEFT B1264 1 BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN VEAP-COM THEFT B3494 2 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT D3550 2 DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-POSSESS-COCA]N-OTH CHAR E4700 2 ESC-GM'FLEE AN OFFICER I2060 1 ~RIM AGNST FAM-GM'NEGLECT OF A CHILD J2500 .' 2 TRAFFiC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J2700 2 TRAF-AC£ID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATIOH J3500 3 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DR]VE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 5 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 3 0 1 4 ~.0 0 0 2 2 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 0 2 100.0 1 1 0 2 100.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 2 0 0 2 103.0 100.0 3 0 0 3 1CO.O 'z, Sol RUW: 31-JUL-89 OFF01 PRIMARY 15N~$ ONLY) NO TIO~ CODES: ALL ]TY COOE$= ALL GE]D= ALL INSTALLATIO(( NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT El(FOES OF FEN$E ACT]VXTY BY ~/26/89 T~U 07/25/89 ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING PAGE / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / --:-BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED KO006 1 KDNAP-UNK CONDITIOn-UN[ ACT-UN[ WEAP-CHLD-STR K6004 1 DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS-UNK WEAP-CHLD-FAM L7051 1 CSC 4-UNK ACT-POS AUTH-UNDER 13-F L7073 2 CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-13-15-F L7173 1 CSC 4-NO FRC-ACQUAIWT-13-15-F M4104 1 LIOUOR ' POSSESSING LIQU~mm'OTHER 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 M5313 2 JUVENILE-CURFE~ M5350 3 RUNAVAY M6501 1 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION M8199 1 CRUELTY TO A~I~ALS-OTHER N3070 1 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE N3090 .' 2 DISTURB PEACE-ES-OPEN SEAL LETTER-TELEGRM-PACK N3190 4 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 03602 1 OBSENITY-MS-INDECENT-EXPOSURE-TO ADULT 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 4 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 2 0 2 100.0 0 2 1 3 100.0 1 0 0 I 100.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 25.0 0 0 0 0 .0 ~N: .31-JUL-89 RINARY ]SN'S ONLY? NO DISPO~ITIO~ C~DES: ALL ACTIVITY C:(Z)ES: ALL GRID: ALL INSTALLATION NANE -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY D]SPOS]TIO~ 06/26/89 THRU 07/2.5/89 CTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL ESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING PAGE / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTIO~ CLEARED CLEARED 3~,S2 I BSENITY-HS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL*ADULT 3110 15 ROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 3130 2 ROP DAMAGE-HS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT 202~ 2 HEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP 2151 1 HEFT-$251-$2500- FE- FRN NOT~ VEHZCLE-HONEY 2169 1 HEFT-$251 -$2500- FE- FRH ~ATERCRAFT-OTH PROP 2~~ HEFT-251-2500-FE-FRN OTHER-OTH PROP $151 1 HEFT-$2SO LESS*FE-FRN HOTOR VEH[CLE-HO~EY 3159 2 'HEFT-$250 LESS-FE'FRH HOTOR VEH~CLE-OTH PROP %059 2 'HEFT-$250 LESS-HS-FRH YARDS-OTH PROP '40~ 1 'HEFT-'$250 LESS-NS-FRH SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP %151 1 'HEFT-$2SO LESS-HS-FRH HOTOR VEHiCLE-HONEY %159 .' *HEFT-$2S0 LESS-HS-FRH HOTOR VEH~CLE-OTH PROP %169 7 *HEFT-$2~O LESS'NS'FRH ~ATERCRAFT-OTH PROP ~1504 1 'HEFT- FE-BOAT-~O HOTOR-301 -~00 0 1 1 0 15 13 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 14 14 0 7 7 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 1 2 13.3 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 RUN: 31-JUL-89 OFF01 PRIMARY ]SN'S O~LY? 'tON LODES: iITY COORS: GRID: ACTIVITY COOE/ DESCRIPTION NO ALL ALL ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION 06/26/89 THRU 07/25/89 OFFENSES ACTUAL REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING PAGE / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED U3065 THEFT-MS-BY SWINDLE OR TRICK-$Z51-S30D U3286 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-S250 LESS U3496 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 LESS U3505 1 THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR-251-300 U3506 1 THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR-250 LESS 1 EAPONB-.S-D,SC. .R .E-P STOL-NO C,AR S-OTHER ACT'FiREWORKS'NO CHAR X3080 1 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 5 1 4 4 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .0 1 2 0 3 100.0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 0 1 100.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 ! 0 0 ! !00.0 1 0 0 1 100.0 REPORT TOTALS - 116 Z 114 73 24 8 9 41 35.9 ~UN: 31- JUL-B9 :FS03 ~RIHARY lSN'S ONLY? ACTIVITT CODES: NO ALL kCT ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 39000 SPEEDING ~9001 J-SPEEDING 39002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 39003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L D9004 RESTRICTED D/L D9005 d-RESTRICTED D/L 09010 BAC OVER .10 09012 OPEN BOTTLE 09014 STOP SIGN 09015 J-STOP SIGN 09016 FA'ILURE TO YIELD 09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 09019 J-EQIPMENT VIOLATION 09020 CARELESS/RECKLESS 09021 J'CARELESS/RECKLESS 09022 EXHIBITION DRIVING 090?_] . J-EXHIBITION DRIVING 09028 DRIVING ON PARK PROP. 09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 09040 NO SEATBE[~ 09050 ALLCY~ING INCOMPETENT TO DRIVE 09100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 09150 NO TRAILER PARKING INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTRENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICZ ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 06/26/89 THRU 07/ZS/89 ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 24 31 1 27 ~6 26 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 6 2 3 2 8 3 3 3 4 8 1 1 4 1 14 10 20 29 1 PAGE TOTAL 14.~ 7 1 3 3 1 1 8 1 -1 5 1 2 3 1 1 16 19 1 49 30 RUN: SI-JUL-89 ]NSTALLAT]O~ #AME -- I~OUI4D POLICE DEPA~I~I~T PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO ACTIVITY C~DES: ALL ENFOR$ CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL ~EA 06/26/89 TI~RU 07/25/89 ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIO~ 09200 09210 09220 09300 09301 09309 09312 09313 09451 09452 09500 DAS/DAR/DAC PLATES/NO-IMPROPER'EXPIRED NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF LOST ARTICLES/OTHER LOST PERSONS FOUNO ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS FOUND PROPERTY pROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. H & R ACCIDENTS ~/TICKET RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ACC/OTHER 09520 PUBLIC PROPERTY ACCIDENTS 09562 CAT BITES 09564 DOG BARKING 09565 DOG.LICENSE 09566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 09710 ATTEMPTED SUICIDE 09720 SUDDEN DEATHS/BOOIES FOUND 09730 MEDICALS 09731 DETOX-MEDICALS j09740 ~ENTAL CASES 09800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED ........... PATROL ARF~LS ........... 10 20 30 ~0 50 60 70 BO 90 1 1 2 3 6 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 5 9 2 1 1 4 PAC~ TOTAL 6 20 3 2 6 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 26 3 1 j~: 3~o~UL FS03 ~RIMARY ISNvs ONLY? ACTIVITY CODES: HO ALL INSTALLATIOI~ NAiqE .. ~ POLICE OEPARTNEk~T ENFOR$ ~kLL$ FOR SERVI~E ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 06/26/89 THRU 07/ZS/89 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIOH 098~1 DC~ESTIC/HO ASSAULT 09900 ALL HCCP CASES 099~0 HAHDGUH APPLICATION 099~3 PROWLER 09945 SUSPICIOUS PERSO~ 09980 UARR~NTS 09990 MISC. VIOLATIONS 099~2 MUTUAL AID/8100 09993 MUTUAL AI076500 09994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER 0C?~96 MUTUAL AiD/NARCOTICS A5007 ASLT'5 UN~HO~dN ACT-UNK ~EAPON-POL]CE A5~43 ASLT 5-1NFLT BODILY HARN-OTN ~EAP-ADLT-STR A5351 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRH-HANDS-ADLT'FAJ~ · k5355 ASLT 5-INFL]CTS ATTEMPTS flR~-flANDS-CHLD'ACQ k5502 ASLT 5-T~RT B~ILY HARH-UNK ~EAP-ADLT'ACG k~O$ ASLT-COERCION-MS'THREAT DMGE PROP-ADLT'STR B~2~' BURG 1-OCC RES ~0 FRC-D'UN ~EAP-C~ THEFT B126~ 03550 E4700 12060 BURG 1-OCt RES NO FRC-N'UN ~EAP-CON THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT DRUGS-SCH 2 WARCOTIC-POSSESS'COCAIN'OT~ CHAR ESC-GH-FLEE AN OFFICER CRIM kGNST FAM-GM-HEGLECT OF k cHILD 10 20 30 1 1 o . - PATROL AREAS ........ 40 50 60 713 8O 9O 1 9 5 1 1 2 10 $ 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PAGE TOTAL 2 3 1 3 22 1 '~0 3 2 2 2 Z 2 1 31-JUL'89 I~sT~LLATIOli o. ~D pOLiCE DEPARTMENT pRI~ARY ISN'S ONLY? NO ACTIVITY CODES: ALL ENFo~,S CALLS FOR SER¥1CE ACTIVITY ANALYS~S BY pA, TROL AREA 06/26/89 THRU 07/25/B9 ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION jZSO0 j2700 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF L]OUOR TRAF.ACCzo. GM.AGGRAVATED VIOLATION J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS'DR~VE UNDER iNFLUENCE OF LIOUOR KO006 KONAP-UNK COND1TION'UNK ACT-UNK ~EAP-CHLD-STR K6004 DEPRIVE OF pARENTAL RIGHTS-UNK ~EAP-CHLD'FAM L?051 CSC &-U~K ACT-POS AUTH-UNDER 13-F L7073 CSC ~-UNI: ACT.ACQUAINT'I~'~S'F ~'r3 csc &-~o FRC.ACQUA~NT'13'lS'F MG~O~ LIQUOR ' POSSESSING M4199 LIQUOR ° OTHER M5315 JUVENILE-CURFEW ........... pATROL AREAS .... 10 20 ~0 ~0 50 60 TO !~0 90 1 2 1 1 1 2 M6501 MBI~9 N3070 W5090 H$190 05602 p3110 p~130 T2029 T2151 RUNAUAY DRUG pARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION CRUELTY TO ANiMALS-OTHER DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE DISTURB PEACE-MS-OPEN SEAL LETTER-TELEGRM'PACK DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING CO~MUNICATIONS OBSENiTY.MS-INDECENT'EXpOSURE'TO ADULT OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE 'pHONE CALL-A~ULT pROP DAMAGE.MS-PRIVAIE'UNK INTENT PROP DA~AGE-MS-BUSINE$S'UNK INTENT THEFT.$251-$2500'FE'FRM BUILDING'OTH PROP THEFT.$251-$2500'FE'FRM MOlOR vEHiCLE-HONEY 2 2 1 TOTAL 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 ~UN: 31-JUL-89 :FS03 P'R]MARY ZSN~S ONLY? ACTIVITY CODES: NO ALL INSTALLATION BANE -- I, K3~D POLICE DEPA3LrTNEB'T E#FORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 06/26/89 THRU 07/25/89 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... - PATROL AREAS ........... 10 ~0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 T2169 THEFT-$251-$2SOO-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP T299'9 THEFT-251-ZSOO-FE-FRM OTHER-OTH PROP T3151 THEFT-$250 LESS-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY T3159 THEFT-S250 LESS-FE-FRM MOTOR VEH]CLE-OTH PROP T4059 THEFT-S250 LESS-HS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP T4099 THEFT-S250 LESS-~S-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP T~151 THEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY T~159 THEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP T4169 THEFT-S250 LESS-HS-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP U150~ T'HEFTrFE-BOAT~NO ~OTOR-~01-500 U3065 THEFT-MS-BY SWINDLE OR TR]CK-$251-$300 U3286 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-S250 LESS U3496 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 LESS U3505 U3506 ~r5120 W3980 ~3080 THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR-251-300 THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR-250 LESS WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-PISTOL-NO CHAR ~EAPOHS-MS-OTHER ACT-FIREWORKS-NO CHAR CRIM AGNST ADMH JUST-HS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS 1 2 1 I' 3 2 I 1 2 I PAGE TOTAL 1 1 1 2 1 1 14 7 I 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 REPORT TOTALS: 115 57 147 106 134 I 3 11 3 577 FIP~ DEPARTMEI~ REPORT ~!cranfi, Minz~ot.& POR MOFI~ OP HOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTI¥tT', k£POk'[ ~ONTH O~ MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE NO. OF CALLS EMERGENCY M'TONKA BEACH - FIRE EMERGENCY M INNETRISTA - F EMERGENCY ORONO - FI RE EMERGENCY SHOREWOOD - FI RE EMERGENCY SPR~NG PARK - FIRE EMERGENCY MUTUAL Al D FI RE EMERGENCY TOTAL FIRE CALLS INDUSTRIAL G~SS & MISCELLANEOUS AUTO FALSE ALARM NO. OF HOURS - MOUND FIRE E~E~G~NCY TOTA~ EHERGENCY - SHOREWOOD FIRE E~ERGENCY TOTAL · -SP. PARK FIRE TOTAL TOTAL EME.GE.CY HOURS TOTAL "~E HOU.S TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY HOURS MUTUAL AID RECEIVED MUTUAL AID GIVEN MOUND, MINNESOTA DR I L D, RE P O RT Discipline and Team work Critique of Fires Pre-Plaining and Inspections Tools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films First Aid and Rescue-u3~er Operation Use of Self-Contained Masks Time Pumper Operation Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzle & Hose Alliance I nhal ator. Operation Time Note: Hourse Training Paid ~ Excused ~ Unexcused Q Present, N6t paid ~;/~' J. Andersen Q'/3-. G. Anderson ~'/~- J. Babb ~. C. Baker ~'/~ J. Beauchamp D' Boyd D Bryce S Bryce ,~//;- D. Carlson ~ J. Casey ~'/~ .S. Collins Qi/~ M. David ~/~-B, Erickson ~/~ S. Erickson P. Fisk J Garvais ~I~- K. Grady ~'/~- P. Henry ~/~-C. Henderson _~ G. Johnson ~//D_ B. Landsman ~//~- R. Marschke ~ V3_ J. Nafus ~/~ B. Niccum QI/~ M. Nelson ~'/~ A. Opitz ~/~ G. Palm ~'/~ M. Palm ~T. Palm ~1~ G. Pederson ~d~ T. Rasmussen /~M. Savage R. Stallman ~'1~ T. Swenson ~'~ W. Swenson Dq~ R. Williams Q'/~ T. Williams Drillmaster MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA DRILL REPORT Discipline and Teamwork Critique of Fires Pre-Plaining and Inspections Tools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films First Aid and Rescue Operation Use of Self-Contained Masks Time Pumper Operation Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzle & Hose Alliance Inhalator .Operation Time Note: Hourse Training.Paid ~ Excused ~. Unexcused Present, Not paid %~/~- J. Andersen ~'/A-.G. Anderson J. Babb C. Baker ~l/~_j. Beauchamp %I/~D. Boyd %~/~ D. Bryce ~'[~ S. Bryce ~_~ D. Carlson J. Casey %t/~ _S. Collins ~ M. David ~t/~- B. Erickson ~1/~_ S. Erickson "~/,,%- P. Fisk D'/~_ J. Garvais %1/~_ K. Grady / P. Henry C. Henderson ~-~7A- G Johnson ~//L Bi Landsman ~ R. Marschke "D11.,%- J Nafus ~-~- B. Niccum ~11~ M. Nelson ~'/& A. Opitz ~-~ G. Palm QII~ M. Palm T. Palm G. -Pederson T. Rasmussen ~1/~ M. Savage -~T/~ R. Stallman ~-~ T. Swenson %l/~_W. Swenson R. Williams T. Williams MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT 0 ~ J. Garvais ~'~- K. Grady O J. Andersen G. Anderson J. Babb J. Beauchamp D. Boyd D. Bryce S. Bryce D. Carlson J. Casey S. Collins M. David B. Erickson S. Erickson P. Fisk P. Henry C. Henderson G. Johnson B. Landsman R. Marschke MEN ON DUTY ~ T. 'Rasmussen /~ M. Savage /'~-~ R. Stallman- ~-- T. Swensen ~ W. Swensen /'7~'~R. Williams M. Nelson A. Opitz G. Palm M. Palm T. Palm G. Pederson ~ T. Williams .2.. ZS. 0 d. ~ J. Nafus TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS /3/ CITY of tVIOUND 5341 h!OUtiD. MINNESC)TA (612t 472-1155 August 2, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. July's Activity Report WATER Jn July we pumped 36,148,000 gallons of water. As I indicated in last month's report well #7 was put back in service. Since then we.have been experiencing pressure problems in the Dutch .Lake area. We have installed a bleeder on the hydrant on Westedge and reflushed the hydrants. This still has not solved the problem. We are looking at the check valve in the well and making some adjustments. Hopefully this will take care of some of the low pressure. The Dutch Lake area (mainly the higher elevation area) bas always had a problem with low pres- sure. This area was like what the people in Island Park had always had until we installed the new elevated storage tank. I feel that the only way we are going to be able to give these people constant water pressure, which would also help lower our mainbreaks, is to put up a storage tank. I will be talking to the manager and engineer about this. SEWER We have been making very good progress in our sewer line maintenance. There was one sewer back-up in July. This has been turned over to the Cities Insurance Company. In other matters, this month we have had very bad luck with fire hydrants. We have replaced four complete hydrants this month. All of the hydrants we replaced were forty years old or older. The same goes for water shut-offs. I believe at last count I had replaced thirty, with twelve comimg iF July. We have given the county a punch list for the items that need to be completed for the County Road 15 project. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOOND. MtNNESOTA 55354 (612¢ 472-1155 August 2, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR JULY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1990 BUDGET - LEVT LIMIT Work'has begun on the 1990 budget. The governor's veto of the tax bill has significantly complicated matters. To comply with the current iaw, we had to certify a proposed levy to the county auditor by August 1st. The law contains a B% levy limit adjustment and I estimated a 2% growth in households or population increase (under the formula you get the higher of the percentage increase of households or population over the stated levy limit increase). I expected the increase to be less than 2%, but estimated that increase since the law states the final certified levy may not exceed the proposed levy certified August 1st. After we certified the August 1st levy, we received the 1989 household and population estimate from the Met Council. The household estimate went from 3747 in 1988 to 3766 in 1989, a 1/2% increase. However, the population estimate went from 9951 in 1988 to 9444 in 1989, a 5% decrease. The Met Council changed their method of estimating population. The metro area has experienced a drop in the persons per household in the 1980's. A ma'in factor in the drop is the increase in the number of one- person households. The Met Council believes the new population estimates will be more accurate than the previous years estimates. We will find out shortly when the 1990 census is completed. What does this all mean for our levy limit for taxes payable in 1 990°. We will be held close to the 35 levy limit increase with a minimal increase for growth. Our final levy will be less than the proposed levy that we sent to the County by August 1st. the admiss,on or access to. or treatment or emp g.,,'"~ect . ~:s p,z.nrams .~d az'.n,:t ~s INYESTMENTS. " The following is July Balance 7-1-89 Bought: CD 9.3 Due FNMA 8.4 Due CP 8.7 Due Matured: CP 9.5 CD 8.1 Balance 7-31-89 JN: ls investment 04-06-90 01-02-90 10-20-89 activity: Dain Marquette Dain Dain Marquette $8,081,133 1 87,1 27 449,87 9 482,85~ (100,000) (,300,000) $8,800,993 CITY of X?IOU'ND ,,,', ,,,....,,-.,D ROAD MOUND. I'¢:NNESOTA 55364 ~612 .:72-! 155 August 1, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL / JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER ~ JULY 1989 REPORT Well, we almost went over the $100,000 mark again for the second consecutive July. We just fell short with sales of $99~613. If it ha'd not rained on the last Saturday of July, we would have made it. In July of last year, we had $102,747 in receipts. Thus ~for the first seven months of this year we have total sales of $530,985. Comparatively, last year at this time, our gross sales were $534,637, So we are down $3,652. Not bad considering the elements. As the summer winds down and beer sales wane, we will begin to gear up for the increase in wine sales beginning in September. I plan to send Julie to a few more wine tastings and seminars to further her knowledge in this important area and to complete the goals we set for her in last year's job evaluation review. AKain, beginning this month, we are going (for the umpteenth time) to have to train in a whole new crew of part-time employees. The ones I have now performed superbly for the summer. Unfortunately, they will be going away to college in the fall. To ease this problem somewhat, I have recently been toying with the idea of hiring a "Permanent Part-Time Employee", which is defined as one who would average 30 hours per week over a one year period. I. had previously considered hiring another full- time person. But with the salary and benefits there would be too much of a strain on our marginal profits. Anyway, a "Permanent Part-Time Employee" may be our answer. The benefits the City would dish out would be minimal, and I would be filling a 30 hour pay slot that I would have to pay someone anyway. It's something to hash over and I will be talking it over with Ed and John in the near future. JK:ls CITY of MOUXD .:-,3-'i M: -'.'.'"_ Z'D August 1, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK JULY MONTHLY REPORT There were 2 regular Council Meetings in July. Packet prepara- tion was done for each of these meetings. Minutes were prepared after each of these meetings. 13 resolutions were prepared. There were clean-up items frOm the meetings and things that had to be sent to various persons. I drafted a public document containing procedures for the City of Mound 'to follow in administering the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and submitted it to the City Attorney for review. I started working on microfilming the City Council minutes and submitted the first two films to the Minnesota Historical Society for their testing. I will begin with the new minutes and work back as soon as I hear if the films meet the requirements. In reviewing the City property cards I came up with 6 parcels that I could find no reason for the city to retain. I am working with John Cameron and the Public Works Dept. to see if they have a reason to retain these parcels. I obtained the new market value figures for the 1990 Fire Con- tracts from Hennepin County. We had to change from assessed values to market values this year. This required changing some language in the original fire contracts and at the same time this was done some other changes were made to update the contract. The figures will be incorporated into the 1990 Fire Contract Material. I attended the following: an educational planning meeting for the next MCFOA conference in March of 1990; the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities legislative update; the League of Minnesota Cities Election and Ethics Co~u~ittee which I am a mem- ber of; and a meeting with BRC (Business Records Corporation) on the Optec III-P voting machines. An equal OppCrtualty EmDto~er that does aot discriminate or', the ~!:s ~ ' '5:~: so.7' ' t". i:ar,,1 ;apFC,C Et~.t_S There were calls and questions from the public. fc GITT of MOUN! TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Geno Hoff Street Supt. July's Activity Report BLACKTOP WORK We finished hand patching the streets that are to be sealed the 7th and swept them the lOth and llth. Allied Blacktop moved in o'n the 12th, it took them two days to do the job. They shot 38,267 gallons of cr2 oil and laid 1900 tons of rock. We had penfect weather and everything went well. The city crew will be out in two weeks with the sweepers cleaning up the excess rock. RETAINING WALLS We had some more retaining wall repair this month. One of the more expensive repairs was the Inverness cul-de-sac. We had an area 44 ft. long and 4 feet high to take down and relay, with a cost of $1,0OO.OO. We had six other minor touchups which totaled up to $500.00. We have some others that are in bad shape, but we're going to see if we can bold off repairing them until next year. REMOVING OF DIRT FILL FROM LOST LAKE We spent four days hauling dirt fill out of the Lost Lake site to a number of different locations around town. Most of it was used for the benefit of the city. SIGN WORK We put up 6 stop signs, 6 no parking sig~ and 3 no p..'king on access signs. We also replaced 12 street name signs o~ Shoreline Dr. and straightened posts. CEMETERY WORK We laid out two graves and six stones. CITT of MOUND 554' tZ-' -,',C TE: MOUb, D. !,' ',,',ESOT/-, 5536: f612 .~72- ~ 155 July 28, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBEJCT: Ed Shukle City Manager Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator July's Recycling July 1 and the 15th were the Saturdays of the drop-off site. J-uly 1 wasn't very busy, probably due to the 4th of July Holiday weekend. But on the 15th they were busy, even had to bring in an additional truck. In the curbside program for the first 6 months we have recycled 14% of our waste stream. We are required by Hennepin County to recycle 10% of our waste stream in the curbside program to receive 80% funding. We have recycled a total of 23% of our waste stream from January thru June. This 23% includes the cardboard that has been baled from Westonka Food and Toro. Coast to Coast also is bring their cardboard to Westonka Foods to be baled. Bids were open for curbside pickup on July 20, only 1 bid was received from BFI for $1.45 per household. I have received alot of calls from people asking when curbside pick-up was coming back. July tonnage was 25.07 tons. CIT' ()f X'I()L'NI JULY 1989 MONTHLY REPORT PARK DEPARTMENT General Comments: July has been a busy month For the Park Department. We were, and are currently working on installing the second playground struc- ture at Langdon Park, riprapping Wawannosa Commons (715 ln. ft.), along with the routine daily maintenance of mowing, trash removal, and weed pick-up on the swimming beaches. Parks We have seen three instances of damage to parks this month by residents using them For accesses to do improvements on their property. The parks that have been damaged are: Avalon, Lagoon, and H-ighland End. in all instances the City was not contacted. We are in the process of requesting that the Famaged areas be repaired, and we are stressing to the violators that they contact us in the Future prior to using the parks for access their property. Commons The water level seems to have been holding, the weather has been Fluctuating as we have a hot spells in which we lose water, then it rains and the lake is replenished. Currently, Minnetonka's water level is at 926.52, the normal high water mark is 929.4, a 2.88 difference. We have noticed a lot of weed growth on the shoreline due to the low water level. Notices have been sent informing dock site holders to cut these areas. Tree Removal/Weed Cuttino Five trees were removed From City property and Four hazardous tree notices were sent to private home owners. Evidence From the 1988 drought can be seen by the tree tops show- ing stress. Some of these stressed trees will be removed in 1990. Cemetery The grounds are sti 11 showing improvement From the drought of 1989. ! F there i s adequate ra i n Fal t i n August, i t wi 1 I greater aid the grass. JF .'p.j ~l~ HENNEP. IN July 28, 1989 ASSESSOR A-2103 Government Center 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesoto 5548 7-0213 ~ AU~ 1 1989 Edward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ed: Re: Your Request for the Current Tax Status of Westonka School District 277's Building at 5600 Lynnwood Boulevard The above property became partially taxable as of the January 2, 1985, assessment for taxes payable in 1986. The tenants included in our January 2, 1989, taxable value calculations are 'li~-~ ~ :~:u u:low along with their total leased area. Tenant Leased Area 1. Lollipop Dragon, Inc. 2,550 square feet 2. Pooh's Place 1,320 3. Susan Morgan 1,111 4. Carter Reese 1,111 5. Westonka Chamber of Commerce 154 6. Greg Cook 964 Total Taxable Leased Area as of 1-2-89 = 7,210 square feet Total Taxable Value as of 1-2-89 : $191,900 We will be reviewing all of the leased areas in this building for the 1990 assessment. Please contact me at 348-3046, if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~Keith M. RE~nfierfelcPiY Principal Appraiser KMR:dpa HENNEPIN COUNTY on co, UoI oppodunity employer MARK ANDREW  PHONE COMMISSIONER 348- 3080 BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMlX{ISSIONERS 2400 OOVER_NMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554&7 July 26, 1989 JUL 2 ? 1989 The Honorable Steve Smith Mayor, City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Smith: As you know, recycling and other solid waste issues have consumed a great deal of time among staff and elected officials here in the metropolitan area during the past year. To sort through some of these issues, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners established a recycling task force, made up of 14 mayors ~nd city council members. The task force has made several recommendations, which I have attached. I will be introducing these recommendations~ in the form ef three resolutions~ to the County Board's Ways and Means Committee on August 3. The hearing commences at 10:00 a.m., and will take place in the Board Room on the 24th floor of the Administration Tower. The Ways and Means Committee will conduct a public hearing on these recommendations, and I encourage you to notify your citizens so that they might make public comment. These recommendations are wide ranging and cover a number of exciting topics, and include the expansion of the Minneapolis plastics ordinance county-wide and the first collection cf household b~tteries ~.n the state. I would appreciate it if you would communicate the details of the public hearing to your citizens. If there are interested citizens, please have them call my office (348-3080) to get on a list to testify. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, M~rk Andrew Hennepin County Commissioner Enclosure HENNEpIN COUNTY RECYCLING TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS Non Funding Policy Recommendations The Recycling Task Force recommends that the County adopt the Minneapolis Packaging Ordinance effective July 1, 1991, contingent upon a member of the Recycling Task Force serving on the City of Minneapolis Advisory Committee on Environmentally Acceptable Packaging. The Recycling Task Force recommends that the County request the State to require final processors of recyclable materials collected from commercial establishments to report tonnages and material composition to the State or the Metropolitan Council beginning in 1991. The Recycling Task Force recommends that the County encourage food service establishments and institutions using plastic, single-service utensils and packaging items, and other industries with a significant quantity of plastic waste to establish their own collection system for reuse or recycling of these materials. 1989 Funding Recommendations The Recycling Task Force recommends that the County establish a work group of municipal recycling coordinators to develop guidelines for evaluating the costs associated with a basic curbside collection program, including reasonable municipal administrative expenses. The guidelines will be used by County staff in evaluating 1990 grant requests. The group will also recommend a uniform method of calculating recycling participation rates in conjunction with State requirements. The County will continue to reimburse cities for the purchase of .household recycling containers. Recycling containers should include at least 20% post-consumer plastic to be eligible for County reimbursement. Cities should complete their initial purchase of recycling containers by December 31, 1989. The County will accept applications and reimburse municipalities who pool togetheF cooperatively to hire staff to coordinate their recycling programs. July 17, 1989 1990 Fundin~ Recommendations The County will maintain the current policy of reimbursing cities for 50-80% of their recycling program costs for collection of, at a minimum, newspapers, cans and glass, with reimbursement tied to performance in removing these recyclables from the residential waste stream, Cities should submit their grant applications to the County by April i, i990, for the i990 program. The County will require each city to submit a copy of its contract for collection of recyclables by a private vendor. The contract must separately identify the costs to collect and process recyclables. The County will work with municipalities to promote efforts to provide recycling opportunities to residents of multi-family dwelling units. Staff time spent on those efforts is eligible for funding in 1989 and 1990. During 1989 and 1990, staff will evaluate the cost of subsidizing collection services and containers for multi-family dwelling units. By 1991, the County should develop an ordinance requiring that recycling opportunities be provided for multi-family residents. The County will require the reporting of participation rates based on a uniform method which will be recommended by the municipal recycling coordinator work group in conjunction with State requirements. The County will encourage municipal curbside collection of recyclable plastics by 1990 when the processing center is open. The plastics to be Collected will be determined by the County and its processing center operator, in coordination with municipalities. The municipal program costs for plastic collection are eligible for County reimbursement. Battery Recommendations Button batteries and small rechargeable appliances should be collected by the County beginning in the fall Of 1989. The components of the program should include' ao Appropriation of $50,000 for implementation and operation of mercury "button" battery collection. bo Identification of companies using thermal metal or other recovery methods and development of a working arrangement for payment of shipping and processing costs. All companies should be investigated prior to entering into any formal agreement. July 17, 1989 Design and production of a collection carton which can be used in retail stores and mail-in boxes for collection sites. Design and preparation of promotional materials for the collection program. eo Identification of retail stores selling merchandise which use "button" batteries as their power source and require their participation as collection sites. Quarterly monitoring of financial statements for reporting amounts of batteries removed from the system. go Collection of small appliances containing nickel-cadmium batteries at drop-off centers after an electronics scrap dealer or other scrap metal dealer has been identified to salvage the nickel-cadmium batteries. ho Appropriation of $100,000 for the nickel-cadmium battery collection program. Following the opening of the Recyclables Processing Center by early 1990 cities would be able (but would not be required) to do the following' Include household batteries (including alkaline batteries) in their curbside programs. The County would accept all batteries collected by such municipalities and would reimburse expenses per the County funding formula. bo Enact ordinances which prohibit disposal of batteries in solid waste and require retail shelf labeling. 1991 Budget Recommendations The following two items were laid over until the next Recycling Task Force meeting September 11, 1989. Cities will be required to establish incentives for each resident to participate in recycling programs by establishing a variable fee or some other mechanism for crediting participation in recycling programs by January 1, 1991. .Beginning in 1991, the County will enter into contracts with each city applying for a recycling grant. Under the terms of the contract, the County will subsidize 50-80% of the collection costs of source separated residential recyclable materials and the city will deliver the recyclable materials to the County processing center. Revenues from the sale of the materials will be shared by the operator of the processing center and the County. The County's share of the revenues would become a source of revenue for the municipal grant program, thereby lessening the dependence on the solid waste tip fee. July 17, 1989 LAKE 402 EAST LAKE STREET ~uly 28, 1989 MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-?033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS JoEIlen L. Hurr, Chair Orono Thomas Rees,e, Vice Chair Mound Jan Boswinkel, Secretary Uinnetonka Beact3 John Lawman, Treasurer Minnetrista Douglas E. Babcock Spring Park Marvin Bjorlin Tonka Bay David Cochran Greenwood Albert O. Foster Oeephaven James N. Grathwol Excelsior John G. ,Malinka Victoria ml3omas Martlnson Wayzata Robert K. Pillsbury · Minnetonka Robert Rascop Shorewood Robert E. Slocum Woodland TO: LMCD Member Community Mayors, City Council Members, Administrators/Managers We are pleased to enclose a seven-month report highlighting multiple water structure applications, committee progress and issues considered by your Lake Minnetonka Conservation District governing Board. At the close of the outline you will also find projections for the major programs which will involve considerable director involvement through 1989 and into 1990. The Board is concerned that it makes a concerted effort to keep the mayors, city council members and administrators informed. We trust this will assist. Should you find some particular point deserving of further background or explanation, please contact your Board represent- ative. We welcome your feedback on this report. Several city councils have already reviewed the 1990 LMCD budget. Your representative is again prepared to appear for the discus- sion, as well as Chair JoEllen Hurr, 0rono, and LMCD's Executive Director. Please advise us of your meeting plans at which the budget will be addressed. JUST AN ADDED NOTE ON THE EURASIAR WATER MILFOIL PROGRESS. THE SECOND WEED HARVESTER IS NOW IN OPERATION. SUBSTANTIAL HARVESTING HAS TAKEN PLACE IN SPRING PARK, CRYSTAL AND LAFAYETTE BAYS. COOKS BAY IS ON TARGET NEXT. WE WELCOME YOUR IDENTIFICA- TION OF SERIOUS WEED PROBLEMS IN YOUR AREA. NATURALLY, THE EQUIPMENT:MUST BE MO%~D AS A GROUP AND ON A COORDINATED SCHEDULE TO KEEP ITS TRAVEL TIME MOST EFFICIENT DUE TO THE HOURLY COST EACH MOVE INVOLVES. FINALLY, THE CITY OF ORONO JUST RECENTLY PROVIDED A COMPOST LOCATION FOR WEEDS ITS RESIDENTS ~ PICKING UP FROM THEIR LAI~ESHORE. YOU MAY FIND ARRANGING FOR A WEED COMPOST SITE A VALUABLE PUBLIC SERVICE. WHILE A FEW WEEDS ARE RELEASED FROM THE WEED HARVESTING OPERATION, THE ACCUMULATION FROM BOAT TRAFFIC AND NATURAL BREAK-UP IS CREATING BURDENSOME QUANTITIES. THANKS FOR THE HELP. Yours,~or a great Lake season, ~ugene R. Str~m~; ~x~c'ut'ive Director att LAKE M IN NETON KA CONSERVATION DISTRICT January~ February Progress Report and Priority Forecast July 1989 Conducted public hearing on low water concerns, preparatory for special family and multiple dock allowances. Completed extensive review of Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club/RDP Partners Special Density Permit and New Dock License, approving with extensive public amenity inclusions, Spring Park Completed extensive review of Chapman Place Marina multiple dock license renewal under new operating management and ownership, Mound, approved. Continued board and committee review of St. Alban's Bay Marina & Yacht Club Special Density Permit and New Dock License (originating 1/88) Reviewed and made recommendation on five dredging/shoreline applications from the }~ DNR. Reviewed and approved eight special event applications. Continued Advisory Committee study of the Comprehensive Management Plan, now in its 10th month, with Sub Committees taking on active role starting with Shoreland Management and Fishries. Conducted a series of five (5) public meetings among Lake area and surrounding suburban communities (Edina, St. Louis Park) to explain the purpose and objectives of the Comprehensive Management Plan. Conducted two public meetings to introduce the Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force plans to implement a program to purchase weed harvesting program and conduct a weed harvesting control operation, setting a private voluntary fund campaign of $750,000 to accomplish first year objectives. Continued study of low water problems prompted by January public hearing. Submitted funding requests to state legislature for 1990 funding support of the Eurasian Water Milfoil weed control program. Conducted advertisement for bids on weed harvesting equipment. Continued extensive private fund raising campaign for Eurasian Water Milfoil weed control program, inviting cities to participate, exceeding $100,000 from private sources through targeted mailing and requests to civic clubs and organizations by personal presentations. Approved a demonstration weed pulling project to be conducted "under the ice". (project was not completed due to sponsor's difficulties.) Management plan sub committees on Shoreland ~nagement, Fisheries, continued their studies. Continued last two of the five public meetings on the Management Plan. Reviewed and implemented an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Special Density and New Dock License for St. Alban's Bay Marina. Reviewed and approved seven dredging applications from ~ DNR. Reviewed and amended Resolution 59, Open Water Fishing Contests. Conducted special meeting with multiple dock (marina & homeowner associations) licensees to discuss low water concerns, how best to address. ~CD P~o~ress Kepo~t. and Prio~it~ Porecast~ Ju~y ~989. ~.. 14arch' Special Board meeting held to review mu_ltiple dock Temporary Dock '~ · Extensionpermits~isubmltted as.~a result of the February Low Water -. Board hearings. 'Twenty:,siX'applicatiOns considered, approved, with two held for clarification.- Set plans for LMCD'$ annual recognition dinner planned for April. Conducted a public hearing on a variance for St. Alban's Bay Marina. Considered, approved special application for Wayzata Yacht Club District Mooring temporary extension. Met with ,representatives of the MN DNR to secure Support for funding ofthe Comprehensive Management Plan through special legislation. Processed twenty nine residental temporary low water dock extension permits. April Heard applicant's request for special density permit for the Minnetonka Boat Works Orono facility, and similar permit for its Wayzata facility. Heard applicant's presentation for Special Density Permit and New Dock License for St. Alban's Bay Marina and Yacht Club, motion to approve the permit and license failing to win approval. Reviewed and approved six additional Temporary Low Water multiple dock extensions. Took bids and awarded contract for Eurasian water milfeil weed control harvesting program to Atlas Marine, Divn. Atlas Foundation, Inc. Awarded contract for purchase of weed harvesting equipment from United Marine Internati6nal,-Waterl°o, NY. Conducted bids for a second 50' long shore conveyor to serve low water accesses in off,loading Eurasian water milfoil weeds. Continued efforts to raise private funds to support EWM weed control program, emphasizing strong media relations campaign, contacts with civic and business organizations for fund assistance. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force continues its monthly meetings to involve multi-agency support in planning, execution of control program. Conducted the April annual recognition dinner, recognizing Water Patrol achievements, retiring LMCD Chair Rascop, and retired executive Mixa. Approved four additional Temporary Low Water multiple dock extensions. May Investigated need for Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) with MN DNR, with determination ~eached that it was not required since all governmental reviews had been conducted and approved prior to request for it, as regards the Wayzata Yacht Club temporary extensions. Approved three Temppra~w Low Water multiple dock extensions. Approved suspension of requirement for residential dock extension temporary permits to facilitate high demand for extensions which are respopsibly being handled by most residences requiring them. Approved twenty fiv~ multiple dock license renewals. Reviewed and approved thirteen charter boat license renewals. Continued Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force priorities dealing with equipment order follow-up, public service cazpaigns to prevent weed spread, organize contract service for conduct of weed control program. LMCD Progress Report and~Priority Forecast, July 1989 June \ July Received 1988 calendar year audit attesting to the year's financial condition and administrative operations as meeting accepted standards. Reviewed and recommended calendar year ~990 operations budget, to include a forecast of 1990 Eurasian water milfoil weed control budget. Adopted and forward to member cities. Reviewed and approved Special Density Permit and New Dock License to add 22 BSU's to the M±nnetonka Yacht Club/Lake Minnetonka Sailing School facilities, including investigation of necessity for Environmental Assessment Worksheet, which was determined by M~ DNR as not required due to the size of the facility being under 20,000 sq. ft. Approved three Temporary Low Water variance requests for multiple docks. Considered a proposal for a study of hand tools best suited for removing Eurasian water milfoil from residential areas, referred back to committee for further evaluation, recommendation. Participated in the Freshwater Foundation 2nd seminar on Eurasian Water Milfoil to assist lake associations and other concerned groups. Received bids from legal service in response to request for proposals for both civil and prosecution, award to be considered in August. Finalized orders for new dock license and variance for a dock over a wetland area, Carson's Bay, Deephaven. .Considering an Order to deny the St. Alban's Bay Marina & Yacht Club Special Density Permit and New Dock License, Excelsior. Reviewing amendments to the Order approving Upper Minnetonka Yacht Clu] RDP Partners Special Density Permit and New Dock License approved in Jan. Investigating an ordinance which would prohibit introducing Eurasian water milfoil and other noxious weeds into Lake Minnetonka. Considering legislative support for a state law regarding prohibition of transporting any kind of aquatic plant from one lake to another (water body). Exploring a video to record the entire season's weed harvesting operation. Reviewing ordinance dealing with Deicing, and possible amendments to allow more recent permanent dock installations to deice as needed. (Presently no new docks may deice after Jan. 86 installation). PRIORITY FORECAST, 1989-1990 PROJECTIONS: 1.' The Comprehensive Management Plan and its seven sub-committees will draw full attention as the study moves into its 15th month of the 24 month evaluation. LMCD community involvement will be particularly urgent in the areas of Inter- governmental Relations - namely those organizations which share a vested interest in the future of Lake Minnetonka -- locally, regionally and the state; Institutional arrangements, involving LMCD's make-up, Board representation and management functions; Shoreland protection designed to combine uniform regulations for the betterment of over-all future lake development. 2. Low water concerns open an array of related considerations, involving dredging, multiple dock extensions, lake navigability and over-all environment. Balancing use with a responsible maintenance of the lake environment will continue to attract serious Board evaluation, pro-active positions and public cooperation. LMCD Progress Report and Priority Forecast, July 1989 3. Assessing the 10ng-term~,00mmitment to Eurasian water milfoil weed control against the results of the 1989 seasom's experience will occupy the off- season priorities of the Task Force. a. U'S Army Corps of Engineers preparations for 1990 participation in the weed control program will be complete as a result of the summer's feasibility study. b. Update plans for 1990 private fund raising for $55,000 in funds budgeted for the 1990 effort. c. Invite city, resident and multiple-dock licensees feedback on 1989 results. Strengthen LMCD staff upon an analysis of the commitments the organization is undertaking in its response to current and at least near-term (1-3 years) apparent obligations. Resolve the results of the Comprehensive Management Plan with member cities, regional and state agencies participating in its development. Prepare for implementation of recommendations adopted. Eugene R. Strommen Executive Director LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE August 1989 AU8 2. 1989 Thursday 3 Friday 4 Saturday 5 Wednesday 9 Thursday 10 Saturday 12 Thursday 17 Friday 18 Monday 21 Wednesday 23 Thursday 24 Institutional Arrangements Subcommittee, Management Plan 7:00 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall Environmental Subcommittee, Management Plan 1:00 pm, Police Conference Room, Lower Level, Minnetonka City Hall Public Officials' Lake Tour 12:30 pm, Lafayette Club, Minnetonka Beach Advisory Committee, Management Plan 7:00 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall Lake Access Subcommittee, Management Plan 7:00 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall Water Structures & Environment committee 7:30 am, LMCD Office, Wayzata depot Use Management Subcommittee, l.[anagement ~ 7:00 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am, Sasha's Conference Room, Minnetonka Boat Works, Wayzata Lake Use Committee 4:30 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Public Hearing: Deicing Code Review 7:00 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting 7:30 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee, Management Plan 7:00 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall Beginning of September: Thursday 9-7-89 Institutional Arrangements Subcommittee, Management Plan 7:00 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall 8-1-89 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473-7033 EVENTS SCHEDULE August 1989 Au~. 1989 Wed 2 Thu'3 Fri 4 Sat 5 Sun 6 Mon 7 Tue 8 Wed 9 Thu 10 Fri 11 Sat 12 Sun 13 Wed 16 Thu 17 Fri 18 Sat 19 Sun 20 Wed 23 Thu 24 Sat 26 Sun 27 Consolidated Sailing Races Wed. Night Bass Tournaments Consolidated Sailing Races No Scow Regatta Consolidated_ Sailing Races No Scow Regatta Consolidated Sailing Races Flying Dutchman Nat'ls Consolidated Sailing Races Flying Dutchman Nat'is Consolidated Sailing Races Wed. Night Bass Tournaments Flying Dutchman Nar'is Consolidated Sailing Races Flying Dutchman Nat'is Consolidated Sailing Races Champs Regatta at UMYC All Womens Cup Consolidated Sailing Races Champs Regatta at UMYC Consolidated Sailing Races Consolidated Sailing Races Wed. Night Bass Tournaments Consolidated Sailing Races Consolidated Sailing Races Antique & Classic Boat Parade Consolidated Sailing Races Wed. Night Bass Tournaments Consolidated Sailing Races E-Regatta Race ~q-WI Pro-Am Bass Tournaments Consolidated Sailing Races E- Regatta Race Consol/,dated Sailing Races 6:00 pm Lower Lake 6:30 pm Upper Lake 6:15 pm Lower Lake 6:00 pm Lower Lake t0:00 am Lower Lake 2:00 pm West Upper Lake 10:OOam Lower Lake 10:30am East Upper Lake 1:30 pm Lower Lake 9:00 am Main Lower Lake 1:00 pm Main Lower Lake 6:30 pm Lower Lake 9:00 am Main Lower Lake 1:00 pm Main Lower Lake 9:00 am Main Upper Lake 6:00 pm Lower Lake .. 6:30 pm Upper Lake 9:00 am Main Lower Lake 1:00 pm blain Lower Lake 6:15 pm Lower Lake a'O0 am Main Lower Lake 1:00 pm Main Lower Lake 6:00 pm Lower Lake 10:00 am Lower Lake 10:00 am Lower Lake 1:00 pm Lower Lake 3:00 pm Lower Lake 10:00 am Lower Lake 1:00 pm Lower Lake 3:00 pm Lower Lake 10:00 - 5:00 pm Lower Lake 6:30 pm Upper Lake 10:OOam - 5:00pm Lower Lake 10:00am - 5:00pm Lower Lake 2:00 pm East Upper Lake 4:00 - 5:30 pm Excelsior Bay 10:00 am Lower Lake 2:00 pm Lower Lake 10:00 am Lower Lake 1:30 pm Lower Lake 10:30 am West Upper Lake 6:30 pm Upper Lake 6:30 pm Lower Lake 2:00 pm West Upper 6:30 - 2:30 Maxwell Bay Marine 10:00 am Lower Lake 2:00 Lower Lake 10:30 East Upper Lake 10:00 am Lower Lake ~~ 1:30 pm Lower Lake LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD' OF DIRECTORS Regular Meeting,7:50 p.m Wednesday, July 26 1989 Tonka Bay City Hall 1. Chair Hurr called the meeting to order at 7:50 p.m. 2. Roll Call Members present: JoEilen Hurt, Chair, D~"c;no: Bert Foster, Deephaven (arrived as noted); Jaoes Grath~,~ol , Excelsior; Robe?t Pillsbury, Minnetonka; J..:n Bos~i nkel , Secretary, Minr~etonka Bee. ch; Tom Reese, Vice C~air, Moused; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Douglas Babcocl', Spring Park; John Halinka, Victoria; Thomas Martinso~, W~yzata. Also present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Sgt. Chandler, Sheriff's Water Patrol; David Arndorf~r, Consuita~t; Eugene Stror.~mer,, E:.,'ec~ti'-e Di~-'ector. Members absent: David Cochran, Greenwood; John Lawman, Treasurer, Hinnetrist~,; Mar,,,i~ B~orli~;, ~onka Be':..,; Robert Slocum, '~ o od 1 and. 5. R~e~.dinq of Minutes Grath~.~ol moved, Reese seco;~ded, that the ,.i~utr~s of the Juf~e 28, meeting be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimousl,/. 4. Public Comments ~1580 Fairview Street~ Green;,;ood, _ ~ _ Susan Horris, ~ and ~r representat~.~ George Dunn, asked the Board to take some action to correct ~ problem created when her neighbors to the s~uth built a combined dock that ~xtends about 50 fe~t over her projected property line. Her dock extends ou~ 74 ~eet, complying with the side setback but the neighbors~ dock extends out 140 fe~t at an angle to the north leaving about 25 to 28 feet between the two docks the~e&y restricti;~g her use of the water. Morris~ attempt to ta!l~ to the immediate neighbor- wms not successful. Charles Melony, L.M.C.D. Inspector, has visited .;.he 'site. Morris d~termined the inspector was mistaken as to her lot ]i;'~e. Tl~e Board age"earl the dock does not meet the criteria for a temporary tow water d._-.ck exten?ion because it encroaches on the ~eighbor~s dock use area without that n_=ighbor~s written permission. Fleese moved, F'i]lsbury q~conded, that th~. Bc'~f-d ~' rsct the E;~ecutive Di~"ector, to enforce the quidel i n~':s., for te~,por~,,~ ~ dr~c;:_ ext~-s:on~_ a~d =~ ad'.,~ s~'~ _ Horn"is' neighbors. Motion cart. led u~animously. Th(*r'e l~er'e r,o other co¢.ments from the public. LNCD ~oard o~ Directors - July 5. REF'O~T$ A. Chair Hurr 1. Hurr reported the Officers and Grath~ol will review the responses .to the request for proposals for legal service submitted tr, ro,_.'.gh OuJy 20. They will select a number to be interviewed and report back to the Board at the August 23 meeting. Proposals are available to any director mt the Lt'!CD offices. The list of respondents'was circulated. 2. Hurt requested confirmat:.on of Board attencar:e at the PuOlic Official's Lake Conferenre on August 5. She is inviting ]udg.:,s who 1ire in the Lake area. and encouraged other directors to do so. 5. Hurr and Strommen reported there were twelve ~.--~¥ors present at a Hayors meeting held OuIy 19 at the City of Shore~,ood Cour~ci! Chamkers. Cot, merits reoarding the District were generaliy positive. So::e cor~ments merit so~,m review according to Hurt: Board mer,,bers to have an alternate when unable to attend ~.,~etings; City Council to direct the representative ho~ to vote: immediate recall of representative if City Council is r, ot satisfied with performance; the District has too many meetings; there was some fee!ing .=.n elEr_ted Bo~rd might ~'e better than one appointed by the cities. The mayors were invited to participate in the Advisor',,' Committee meetings, ?.~r~'c~.,~ ~rly the sub-committee involvino inter-oovernr, ental Reiations. Hurt said'it is ir,~portant ~or board members to communicate with their c'~t'.' officio. Is, keeping them ir~formed of on-going LI'ICD activities. B. Financial Reports, Strommen for Treasurer Lawman 1. Stromr,~en submitted the finar~cial ce;~dition report ms o~, 6/~0/8c, commenting that a quarterly report is being prepared goir, g back to 1/i to give a complete year. Thirteen cities have mm, de their contribution to the Mi!foil Fund, There is about $5,000 outstanding on ~:i]foi] pie~..:~es. Rer,:,.nder letters have been sent. It is anticipated most of the ple~es ~;ill be paid. The office sold ~540 of tichets to the Carriage Classic. Their c!ub's contribution is expected shortly to assist milfoil funding. There wi11 aiso be e, receipt of $7,000 from the Easy Race sponsored by th._. Bani: !,;my:ara and Exce!sior. Reese moved, Boswinkel seconded, ,approval of the f.~n~r, cia! condition ~-eport for June 50, 1987. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Strommen submitted bills for approva! in the a.-,.ount of $22,177.40, checks numbered 5549 through 55B7, noting check number 5567 res,-rved 4or United Harina international for harvesting equipment pav~,ent to be made p~r contract requirements. Checks nL, mber 5565 e, nd ~.JB7 vo~ded d.,Je tc ir, c~:rr~rt ~mo~,q~ re paid on check numbers ~o6 and 5568. Rascop moved, Grathwo] seconded, a~pro','al of p~_i. ment of .~ills in ti~e a.?,,"_',unt of $22,177.40. ~1otion carried unmnimously. LMCD Board of Directors - July 26 1989 C. Standin~ Committees I) WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Cochran a) Grathwol mo;,ed, Rascop seconded, approval of LI,e 7,,8/89 r.,i;~L, Les as submitted. Motion carried unanimouslyo b) Cardinal Cove Beach Association, New Dock License, Halsted's Bay The Board received the report of the Public Hearing keid on 6/28/89. The City of Minnetrista hes licensed these docks for a nu~be~ of years. L~Fevere opined that back licensing is not necessary because the docks conform to the code. Grathwol moved, Pillsbury seconded, approval for the C~r'dinal Cove Bearh Association, permitting five BSU's for three off-shore families on Outlot 7 rdl oc k~', Cardinal Cove un 1 eo~ the Ex e c u ~ i ,.,e.. Director d ~ ~' o~- m i n ~ ~.~_ _~ the~o. ~ is justification for back licensing back further. !'lotion carried unanimously. c) Rosenblum/Ulrich Variance Order The Board received the Findino~ of '~ Public ~ ~ ~,~e HearJnq of z,"'°~ ;RO a~lowir, g cons~.ruction of a dock over wetlands on C~rson s ~a',' ~:1~610 Co~tac]ewood F~oad, Peephaven), the Order approvi;~g a length variance to construct ~ dock extending no more than 135 feet from the shoreline at elevst~on 929.4, NGVD, subject to the following conditions: Installation and removal by non-~.echanical m~ns. Dock must meet side setback limitations .._-,f LMCO Code~ Dock to be constructed as sho~..~n on attachmept with Order· The installation is complete, mhd is m seasonal dock, e'ii~inating ~.he need for an as-built survey. Grathwot moved, Foster seconded, e, pprove, l of Order f~z~r 5:osenb!u~,/Uirich variance as recommended. Motion carried unanir.~ous!y. d) Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club/RDP Partners Order Board received the Committee rmco~mendat~on for Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club/RDP Partners Findings and Order ~.~ith amendment of minor differences. ~rco~t.ance of changes and George Dennis, representing the applicant, explained tt~e changes in the public amenities as follows: a. TI~e k~...o slips originally pro~'idsd for use- k,? the UI~iv~rsit,~, of ilir~:~esota Sailing S.-.h.'~o! a~'e provided at the Er, chantod Handicapped accessible docks .from the building sntranc~. Lo elev~ ~nd ramps is subs~it,..~ted. - continued LMCD ~oard o~ ~Jrectors - 2uly 26, 198~ b. Six rental sailboats shall be made a,.,eii~:ble to experienced public at tarqe by reservation. .E._:.'p. erience ~.,..il~ be decioed :~,sed or, I.:hether the renter has had training at the Hound classes or cof:,parab]e t,"e. lning. The boats will be available except when being used for c!esses. c. Specifies the meeting room shall br. nade a'.,ailabie to the co~,~,unity for civic~ educational or safety purpose .oroups bv reservation, ibis complie~ with the Spring Park zoning ordinance by limiting the use to speci4ic d. The swimming beach , sail boards ~nd sei!zc, ats shall be r, ade available for use by, and be used by, West Tonka Cor.-~munit,, E~u~ation classes. k. The deck and picnic area to be constructed and shall be available by reservation by the general public ~or ~'.'vic, or s~,fetl' purposes_. This also is to conform, t.~ th~ Sprir,g ordi nance. ,maint~=i ned sduoat i o,qa] Peri.: zonino Grathwol moved, Pillsbury seconded, approval of Findinos of Fact and Order as amended atiowing Upper ~'~innetonka Yacht C]ub~.RDF F'=_rtners a r,e~.~ dock" license, special density per,it and variance_. !.lotion carried e) Eagle Bluff Association 1988 and 1989 dock license. Grathwo! ~oved, R~scc, p seconded, approve.] of i;88 and !~d9 dock license_ for Eagle Bluff r~ssociatic..~ for 6 BSUs. I'iotio~ cerri;~d u:,ani~.ovslv. Catamaran Temporary Storage at Wayzata Yacht Club Grath~.:ol moved, F'iilsbury seconded, ratification of - ~ -2.5 _ beach storage of catamar.--~ns ,.lu!~ .~1 on th~ Wayzata 'facht Club part of the Aquatennia]. t'iotion carried ur, animously. temporary Island as g) St. Albans Bay Marina and Yacht Club Grathwol ~.:o'.'ed, Pillsbury seconded, appro,/~! r,*' the Findings and Order denying the application of St. Albans Bay r'larins, for ~ Special Dens,~ty Peri, it and new dock license. Reese spoke in opposition to the motion e:s e co .... ror, ise proposal had 'bee~-, under consideration. He h~d discussed m CO,T, pro~..ise a~reer,~ent ,~th Mayor of Greenwood. I;~ his abse~ce the I'i.~),or ne~.,_~d Mark Kelly tc ~:eet G~rald Tobermanr, nd Rees~ concerr~ng a co~promise agroe:~e;~t the ~'ia',,c,r ~as to have fa~,ored. John Clifford, Dorse). & Whittle!', r~p~ser, ti~g the ~ity Green~ood s~id ~here. ~as no agreement as mu~h~.~-ity~.~, lie~_ ~.~ith *h~ ~ Green,.~ood City Council and not Kelly. He urged mppm, royal of the Findinos ~od Reese further objected to some .~f the findinos. Hur,''s ~otion to table failed. LHCD Board o{ Directors -July 26, lq89 Grathwol spoke in favor of the original motion, stating not on the ~oard might agree with all of the findings but they state, in light possible, what the majority want to do at this time. everyone the best Responding to a q~,estion from Martinson as to whether Tobermann had been asked to respond with a revised plan, Strommell said he had talked to Tobermann and Tobermann did not see any further value in offering a~y ~urther proposals. Grath;.~ot called the ouestion and the motion passed with Reese voting nay and Hu~'r abstain~n.q. Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, approval of St. Alban's Ei~y Marir, a & Yacht Club variance application, for ove~ ~ .~ppi~nq DUAs. ~-~oti on c~rried unanimously. h) 1989 Dock License Renewals Rascop moved, Grathwol ~econded, a!,proval of i989 dock for the following: Howard's Point Harina, South Upper Lake (Shore~,~ood); Hazy Kreslins, St. Alban's Bay (Greenwood); and Upper Hinnetonka Yacht Club, South Upper Lake (Shorewood). Motion carried The Board was informed Bean's Greenwood Marina, St. Aiban~s (Greenwood) ha's expanded by adding si;.,' slips ~-~itho;.~t a per:~it. The applicant stated in a phone exchange with the Ex,cut;ye [irector t~lat riley added six to take the place of six they have lost duo to low ;~ater, The applitant admitted not making application for a temporart, tow water pe,-mit. Strommen has asked them to either make application for a new dock lice~se or for a !ow w_ater temporary permit. LeFevere advised that if a violation exists it should be reported for p~'osecution to get the pro.tess stm.~ted unless prope? application is made by the deadline of 8/4/G9 as required i.~, the '~iolatio~, notic~. i) Other The Committee has requested dredging be completed ms soon as possible. report on the Libb's Lake No action was taken on the Wayzata ','._~.-ht Club dock iicer~e rene~,;a! as the City of Wayzata formal reply period i_:psed its 45 day all~,war~ce. Other business considered at the ~at_~r St~uctures J:',l~, meetinq will be discussed under the Eurasian Water Hilfoil rep~_~rt. 5. c. 2 ) .E_ g_~_A_SJ_A_ N_ EA_I.E.E .~U_L.f_O_LL. !_A_S.E .F_Og~E, C ~: a i r R e e s e a) Reese reported the seco~,d ha~,,~ester will be delivered 7/£7, _ 5. -~s~ d.~iavs arm ~=~ng .another- the third on R/28 and the fourth on 9,' _ = , . .... '' month of unanticipated dela!~, red..~cinq b,, 20 - J0% the ~nti~ip~ted acr~'a~e planned, for cutting this summer. LMCD Board of Directors - July The first harvester is not cutting the tmrget of 1.1 acres per' hour or fourteen acres a day. Each day sees some improvement ~n~ ~s of this o~eeti~ date it is averaging seven to nine acres pmr de!'. Pmr~o ~ this mioht b~ c~used by getting used to hand!lng the equip~ent but doe~ have ~ effect on cu~ cost of harvestin§ budget, Reese added. The Board discussed payment for the equipmmn.'-, recei;,ed to dmte ..=.r,d anticipated in the immediate future. Reese favored pa:'ino for the equip~qent received and due to be received in the n~,r future, is_=-: t~-,s ~i50 .~. d.~,.,' !ate delivery penalty and then reconside: the penalty on the !asr two ~ach~nes. feels the manufacturer ma!~ have financial difficulties if the penalties are too high and the .55 day period after delivery allowed for the L~!CD to make is adhered to. Strommen recommended the foliowing pay~ent received to date: s~.~ edu!e ~or equipment Harvester ~1 - $75,.512 (27 days late et ~150/d.~y Shore Conveyer $16,664 (27 days late st ~150/day Harvester q~ - ~71,5I)0 (41 days ~ at $15O/day Engine Cancellation - freight charges o~: 5 enoines = ~6~,2E2.VV = ~2,614.00 = ~5,550.00 = I,i~.50 of ..4~,,000 is available from checkihq balance, rs.~ei.q~ng fund= a;,ai!able when m Certificate of Deposit ~atures. Hurt does not favor making any chan.c, es in the agre[.C upon peyr, ent schedule because of the cost in harvesting tir, e to the District. Pss..:op opposed r..a;.i~.g pays, ant before it is due. Babcock said h:is Counoi~. h~s re:ently taheq a hard position on sticking to contractue,] obligations, Foster ex,,tossed concern about m possible fi;~ancim~ default on the part o~ the ~ar;u~cturcr and suggested · eeting with their banker to see what condition t!,e making p.ay~ent to their supplier to ease their cash LeFevere re~,inded the Boar¢ they are not fram contractual agreement without a change order to the contract. pmckage could be put together which would include a d~remse da~/ages. to ~orgive an,,., He said p~_r.."',aps ~ in !in,ida. ted Reese moved, Foster second~d, authorization ~ a~iow the Executiv~ Director and Ch~ir to enter into a discussion ~ith the suopiier to ~eter~n? what ~enefits LMCD may get in exchange for ~,odifyi~g ti~e ~!50~d~y penalt? on tbs balance of equipment to be delivered. Motion carried, Rascop voti~,g nay. b) Proposed Ordinance Reese moved, Rascop seco~ded, to rscc.~,m-~:~ the attc-;~e.' draft -.',~, ~.ihich x'c, uld prohibit introducing Eurasimn ~ater milton: c.r anT oth6, r weed into Lake MJhneton;¢, ~-nd' prohibit carrying e ncxi:.?s :.coed fror~ the except to ~ppro,.,ed facilities, penalty to be ~ ~isde¢,ear..:r. lhe tares shoL, ld the sa~,e as ti,ese of (t-,e M;~ Department of ~:atural Reso.'rc~s. :'lotion carrie~ unani ~.o:; s ! y. LI'ICD Board of Directors - 3uly2~, 1~8~ c) Request from Lake Waconia Association Reese moved, ~;artinson seconded, preparation of e leLter supportino the Lake Waconia Association request for legislation that would provide ~or a state-wide law regarding prohibition of transporting an), kited of aquatic plant. Motion carried unanimously. Hurt reported that when in attendance at a meeting in Bemidji recently Eurasian water milfoil ~as discussed. The people in the lake region are very concerned, as is the D!~R. Boswinkel suggested the District put more emphasis on the programs being developed by the District. Hurr said th~ newsletter is qear completion. It was agreed there is a need for Eurasian ~.~ater Milfoil research but until a long range solution is developed to control the weed, the District's prog~-ams will provide immediate Lake improvement. d) No action was taken on a proposal to ~sell T-shirts with a printed message referring to the eradication of milfoi!. e) Hurt moved, ;'ialinka seconded, an authorizatio~ to join with the DNR in preparation of a video documenting this year's weed harvesting program at a cost of $2500., matched by the D;-~R, with the understanding the expenditure is within the budget, i,lotion carried, Grath~ol voting nay. 5. C. 5) LAKE USE COMMITTEE, Chair Pillsbury a) Pillsbury ~oved, seconded by Foster to approv~ the minutes of 7/17/89 meeting with the following corrections and additio;~s: Under Analysis of Alternative Solutions - first severance Page 1 - Under the "do nothing" approach, Chandler i~dicated that while current laws ~re being vigorously enforced against personal watercraft (pwc), comi~iaints are numerous. He also pointed ouL that while there is a i50~ law against a~y watercraft, including a pwc, from passing at speed ~ithin i50' of a dock or moored boat swimmin~ beach, there is no regulation preventing any watercraft, includinq p~.~c, from passing closer than 150~ at speed to another watercraft at spee,d. Page 2 - add to the analysis the followi;~g: Probably pass a 15'1' rule fcr p~.~'c to prevent them from operating ~ithih 150' of al~o~.h[~r' watercraft when at speed. Page 2 - add the following: Pillsbu,-y suggested designation o~ the l,~orthwest area of Big Island as a quiet area. Motion ca, tried unanimously. b) F'illsb,,r v ,~,oved, Foster seconded, appr :.~.., ~ 1 o~ wine/beer ]ice:~ses for- Corporate CI~arter and A1 & Alm_~'s contingent ~,[:on re~:eipt of the ~ritten report f?'om tl~e Sheriff's Departed_hr on A1 & Alma's. Motion carried un e~n i anus 1 y. LMCD B~ard o{ Dlrectore - July26, l~Bo, c) P~ ] 1 :~bUr';' mc, ~,ed ~ Foster seco;=Oed ~ cont~ nu.~tion~ with no change, 'of Ordinance ~ Providing Procedures for ]=.suinc Fishing Cont,=st S[,eciei Event F'ermi~s. Motion carried unanimously. d) Water Patrol Report Sgt. Chandler reported there La:,e best, three fatal accidents on Lake Minneton!~a this season: Ar, ~ccidentai boe. tir, g death: drowning of a !6 month old, (I.~hich me,'-..' result in filing oS charges), and an accidental swimming death off of Cedar Print. C~andler s='id mi!roi! w=..s not a cmuse o~ the drowning but did ha~per ~ec:.very ~f~or~=_. ~n obss'.-v..=~ ~t the scene of the latter death was present and to.~-L exce~t'.of to '5.hand~e'- s CO.T,~eots, _ta~ing her information was that tho victim, =~as en,.~ngleo ir~ ~,iifo~! Chandler reported there have been z.~ B;,!i arrest=' thr~e iuven~l~ ha,.e apprehended in conne:t~On with boat thefts: the Patrc'.' is ir, fui2 swing decibel testing and are issuing citation, s. e) Hurr moved, Foster ....... =.~,, , ~,,~i ~ H~.~ 7:00 D m. , August ~3 , . - _, . . ~, on pos=ible Code amendme~,t ~or de icinc er'dir,g / '" eligibility to de-ice. Motion carried unanimously. 5. C. 4) ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Chair F(aese, Co.nsultmnt A~-,doCfet a) Arndorfer sub~.iitted e prcgress repc.rt cn the Lake i'lene.,:,e~,ent Plan, ~ndic~,tino ~t is ell tom, no tooether ,-a~,i~ilv. He ir, creased participation by Boa~'d members ~ tLe plan is ,T.~ving ~ro~: matters to the political area as the tir, e re~rs to seZi the Plan to Counc i 1 s. {ii r)net onL?. :__--{::ed f~r the City The City of Wood!s;~d has requested m prc-sentatic, n .~r,.¢. Hurt will ~oin him et the ~eptember 5 Council meeting. 5. C. 5) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT a) Stro~imen reported Budoet pr~ssntaticns hs,;e beer, ~ade =+ n or:o Spring Park and Tonl:a Bay City Councils. Or, e concert, st Toni::a Be'/ was the F'ublic Relations Budget of ~15,000. Ouesticns wer~ also raised ~bout the durat~or, of ~rank Mi:<a's contract. H~nneton!~ Beach and Oror, o hm,.'e mcp'ove~ the 1S'90 budget. In response to a question from P'sscou, LeFevere said the "Truth Zn Tm'.:atlon" law does not require (he LHCD to publish its k~udget. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 7. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hurr declared the ,~:eetir~g adjourr, ed at 10:30 p.n. Sub¢.itted Pppro'.ed- by: Jan Bo~winl el, Secretar'., MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION July 24, 1989 Present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners GeofF Michael, Ken Smith, Frank Wetland, Brad Sohns, William Thal, Vern Andersen, and Jerry Clapsaddle, Council Representative Liz Jensen, Building Official Jan Bertrand, and Secretary Peggy James. Chair Bill Meyer called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. MINUTES: MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Weiland to ap- prove the Planning CommissiOn Minutes of July lO, . 1989 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONAL: a. Shoreland Management Ordinance. The Building Official explained that the Shoreland Management Plan, the Shoreland Management Working Paper, and the Water Quality Working Paper will al) be part of the Shoreland Manage- ment Ordinance to be adopted by the City of Mound. The Con~nis- sion discussed the authority of the Metropol itan Council compared to the LMCD. Minimum lot sizes in Mound were discussed and clarified by the Building OFficial. The Commission expressed a concern with the LMCD reviewing variance requests. Jensen questioned, if the Planning Commission has criteria to Follow, why should the LMCD also review variances? What kind of impact will the shoreland ordinance have on the City of Mound? The Building OFFicial stated that the impact is hard to predict, however offered some examples, such as: the DNR model ordinance (which Mound is unable to adopt) requires that you count the square footage on your lot for what is impervious surface and what is not, and requires permits For inclines steeper than ]2% grade. The proposed Shoreland Management Plan for Mound limits, among maqy other things, lighting and noise on · the lakeshore. Planntng Commission Minutes JUly 24, ]989 P~ge Two MOTION ~ade by Weiland, seconded by Anderson, the Plan- ning Commission is to Further r~view the proposed Shoreland Management Plan, and return with specific questions at the nex~c workshc%o meeting. Motion carried unanimously. b. Housinq Maintenance Ordinance / Truth in Housinq. Each Commissioner expressed his/her Feelings as to when and how to present the proposed ordinance to the City Council, The issue of enforcement was discussed. The Commission was basically in Favor of the Following: - Licensing multi Family housing and having yearly inspec- tions. Inspecting residential and rental homes at time of sale. Inspecting on a complaint basis, if complaints received From 8butting neighbors, police, or fire department, Removing "unscheduled inspections" as now written in Appen- dix C, Section 1]. A new home buyer should be informed about: existing lot restrictions, water bill balance, and repairs needed to bring dwelling to code. Community efforts / services available need to be outlined. Ensure available staffing. The-Commission determined that an executive summary be written explaining the Planning Commission's recommendation For direction to the City Council, including: .. - We real i ze there is no enforcement. List what types of enforcement are available (i.e. complaint basis, licensing multi-Family housing, inspection at point of sale, "buyer beware" non-compliance, mandatory compliance For multi Family, etc.). identify citizens input Request to get a proposed ordinance from the City Attorney for review so a public hearing can be held. Planning Commission Minutes July 24, 1989 Page Three The Building Official suggested that a Commission member present the executive summary and attached exhibits at a City Council meeting. MOTION made by Sohns, seconded by Weila~, that Clal>- saddle create a cover ietter/execc~cive sun~ary for the proposed housing maintenance ordinance to be presented to the City Council. Motion carried unanimously. Clapsaddle denied the offer, he feels more than one person should be involved in writing the letter. MOTION WITHDRAWN by Sohns, Weiland secondecl. The Commission determined that a subcommittee should be developed to create the summary. Sohns, Clapsaddle, anO Michael volun- teered to be on the subcommittee. c. City Council Representatives Report. Liz Jensen reviewed the City Council meeting of July 11, 1989 and the Committee of the Whole meeting of July 18, 1989. Thai raised the issue of Commissioner's terms expiring this year. He questioned how the interviewing process will be handled. Jen- sen admitted that the process the City Council used last year was incorrect. She added that the City Council will be reviewing the ordinance to determine if Planning Commission members should have limited terms. MOTION made by Andersen, seconded by Smith, to adjourn the meeting at I0:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Chair, Bill Meyer Attest: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA M',NNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS JoEIlen L. Hurt, Chair Orono Thomas Reese, Vice Chair Mound Jan Boswinkel, Secretary Minnetonka Beach Mark Westlund, Treasurer Wayzata Marvin Bjorlin Tonka Bay David Cochran Greenwood Albert O. Foster Deephaven James N. Grathwol Excelsior Ron Kraemer Spring Park John Lewman Minnetrista John G. Ualinka Victoria Robert K. Pillsbury Minnetonka Robert Rascop Shorewood Robert E. Slocum Woodland TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: AUGUST 3, 1989 FROM: TOM KEESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECT: JULY REPORT- LMCD 1. GENERAL INTEREST ITEMS 1.1 Eurasion Watermilf0il Task Force. The first two harvesters have been delivered and are working. As of today, they have cut more than 140 acres of weeds. Operators are still in. the process of learning the best methods of running the. equipment. The first cutting of Cook's Bay should be concluded this week. A few equipment days have been lost due to repairs, which is to be expected with new and largely untested equipment. The final two LMCD harvesters will be still another month late. They are presendy scheduled for delivery the last week in August and the end of the first week in September. The Parks machine will follow after our 4th one. This late delivery will reduce the total season harvest. We do plan to run longer than originally planned in the fall. We have been told that late harvesting has a great effect on the reduction of growth in the following year. For data gathering purposes the lake has been gridded into eighth mile squares, each of which is uniquely designated. Amounts and nature of weeds collected, along with operating information is being gathered for each grid. This information is being captured and summarized by a program developed by Hennepin Parks. The data resides on their computer for future analysis by the Technical Sub Committee. 1.2. Comprehensive Lake M~n~lgcmcnt Plan The significant work accomplished this month includes initial meetings of the Intergovernmental Studies, and Institutional Arrangements sub committees. Much interest was obtained from the cities and other agencies on the subject of the future direction that the LMCD should take. The Institutional material is mostly an in-depth look at how the LMCD is run internally, how it can be improved, and how it should grow, if indeed, growth in accountabilities is an outcome of the management plan, 2 Some interesting meetings have been held by the Lake Use and Lake Access sub committees. The data presented often is a variance with commonly held assumptions about the lake and its USES. 1.3 Other items. PCr$gnal Use Watercraft. These craft have been the source of numerous complaints from residents and boaters. The LMCD is presently studying various methods used by other jurisdictions to handle the safety and noise problems caused by them. It is anticipated that an Ordinance will be forthcoming. Weeds 9n Trailers. The Legislature will doubtless pass a strong restriction, on the transportation of noxious weeds, from one lake to another. The LMCD is in the process of drawing up such a local ordinance to cover this situation, so local enforcement officers can be enlisted in the "clean trailer" program. 2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS - MOUND (None) Mound Representative Lake Minnetonka Conservation District TR:mac cc. Gene Strommen METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 Eaxt Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN. 5.$101 612 291-6359 July 24, 1989 TO: Local Government Contact People JUL S t The Metropolitan Council staff has prepared preliminary April 1, 1989, population and household estimates for your community. This year, the Council is using a new method to prepare the population estimates. These preliminary estimates, together with a fact sheet containing the primary data used to prepare your community's estimates, and an explanation of the new methodology, are enclosed. .The Council would like to hear your comments or concerns before finalizing the estimates for the State Department of Revenue. The change in estimated population or number of households is a part of the formula used to determine levy limits applicable in 1989 for counties and for. cities of 5,000 or more population. The Council also uses the numbers to monitor population and household changes in Metropolitan Area communities. Please address questions concerning the levy limits and local government aids to Rich Gardner, Minnesota Department of Revenue, 296-2286. We'd like to finalize these estimates by August 21, 1989. To do this, we need your comments as soon as possible. If you have concerns about the estimates, please contact Kathy Johnson (291-6332) or Michael Munson (291-6331) as soon as possible. We will make every attempt to work with you to make any necessary adjustments in time to be incorporated in the Revenue Department's calculations. Written comments may also be directed to Ms. Johnson. Because the population and household estimates are of great importance to the cities, as well as to the Council in its planning work, we want to provide estimates that are not only accurate, but treat each city fairly and consistently. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Steve Keefe, Chair SKjkp Enclosures A NOTE ABOUTTHISYEAR'S POPULATION ESTIMATE This year the Metropolitan Council has revised the method of estimating population to make use of results from a household size survey we conducted in the summer of 1988. We did not change our household estimation method. Households are calculated using current residential building information (provided to us by municipal officials) and indicators of occupancy (usually utility data) for each city or township. We believe our household estimates will prove to be quite accurate when compared to 1990 Census data because they are based on actual counts of building permits issued. Without similar, reliable demographic information, it is not possible to achieve this same level of accuracy in estimating population. To assist us in converting our household estimates to population, the Council conducted a survey of 22,500 single-family homes and 12,000 "other" types of housing units (townhouses, apartments, etc.). Our intent was to measure current household sizes in various types of units, and then to calculate changes since the 1980 Census. Some adjustments to the raw data were necessary so they could be used at the municipal level. Our first step was to assemble groups of cities and townships with similar characteristics. Single- family groups were based on similar 1980 Census age distributions of heads of households residing in single-family homes. We assumed that places with similar age composition have experienced, th~ same type of changes in household size. We calculated a 1980 persons per household figure for each of these 15 groups from census data and comparable figures for 1988 from our survey. We then applied the change between 1980 and 1988 for each group to the 1980 persons .per household for each city and township within that group to determine their 1988 persons per household. We followed a similar procedure to group responses from "other" households. The 10 "other" group~ were assembled based on similarities in household size from the 1980 Census data. When these 1988 persons per household figures for single-family and other housing units were used to calculate 1988 city and township populations, a regional population estimate far above the Council's 1988 estimate, and even further above the State Demographer's estimate for 1988, resulted. For that reason, it was necessary to make further modifications of the survey data. We have used the State Demographer's estimate as an approximate regional control since 1974, because it is based on sound demographic data using methods jointly developed by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Demographer's office. These estimates are available only at the county level, however. Our analysis of the composition of the survey responses indicated a much lower proportion of one-person households than was shown in 1980 Census results. It is possible that one-person households could have declined, but an analysis of household size by age in 1980 and current projections of the regional age distribution, suggest that, if anything, the proportion of one-person households should have increased since 1980.. It is also well documented that one-person households are frequently undersampled and have a lower response rate in surveys. We, therefore, weighted the one-person households in the sample more heavily and reduced "other" households proportionately. This adjustment is further supported by comparing the survey results to recent special census results in six Metropolitan Area cities (Apple Valley, Coon Rapids, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Maple Grove and Woodbury). In four cases, the special census showed significantly more one-person. households than indicated in our survey. In the other two cities, the proportion was about the same. 1551 We further reduced persons per h0meholds to make the e~timate more eomktent with the State Demographer's -eounty level estimates. Such an adjustment can also be viewed as continuing the downward trend in pemotm per household that the survey revealed in all geographic areas between 19g0 and'IgC8. Uniform factors were developed for each county and applied to all cities or townships within that county. The only other adjustments were made to reflect recent special census results in several cities. In employing this new method, many individual cities' or townships' 1989 population numbers are significantly different from 1988. We expected this outcome since the method uses different data to estimate population change between 1980 and 1989. It is related to the 1988 population estimate only through the household data, which both the new and previous methods use. Population changes are not used in any State formula unless they increase, and the higher of either population or household change from the past year is used. In virtually all cities, households have grown more than population every year since 1980. If you have any questions about these methods, please call Michael Munson at 291-6331, or Kathy Johnson at 291-6332. 1989 Housing Units Housing Estimate By Type Single-Family Multifamily (incl. Townhouse) Mobile Home TOTAL Household Estimates Estimated Total (Including 1980 Uncompleted Estimated Estimated Housino. Units 1988 Permits) Completed Occupied 1980 Household Estimate 1988 Household Estimate 1989 Household Estimate Population Estimates 1980 Total Population 1980 Group Quarters Population 1989 Group Quarters Population 1989 Population in Households 1989 Population Estimate Persons Per Household 1980 Persons per Household 1988 Persons per Household 1989 Persons per Household *All numbers are as of April 1 of each year. KJP00212 This sale POLICY ON THE SALE AND SERVICE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES establishment maintains a consistent, firm, written policy on the service 'and of alcoholic beverages to the public. All employees must follow this policy; failure to do so may result in an employee's immediate dismissal. Alcoholic beverages will be served or sold only by designated employees who have been trained to discover if patrons are of legal age and who have been trained to determine if a patron is approaching or is visibly intoxicated. No employee will serve a patron who is under-age. No employee will serve a patron who is "obviously" or "visibly" intoxicated. If any customer of this establishment has been refused service or been denied a purchase because of age or condition of intoxication, all employees will exercise caution that this customer does not possess or consume any alcoholic beverage, regardless of how it was obtained by this customer. It is the policy of this establishment that servers of alcoholic beverages or salespeople selling alcohol report to management their observations and evidence that a patron may be approaching intoxication. These observations may be based on calculating approximate Blood Alcohol Levels, on the actual behavior of patrons, regardless of how many drinks consumed, or upon the judgement of the employee alone. Management takes the responsibility of intervening in the event a customer needs to be den~ed service or sale of alcohol. Once a decision has been made to deny service or a sale to any customer, that decision cannot be reversed for the rest of the day. In other words, once someone has been "cut off'', he or she remains "cut off" for the day. Every reasonable effort will be made to help prevent a patron who is nearly or "obviously" intoxicated from driving upon leaving our establishment. In the event an employee feels the patron is unable to operate a vehicle responsibly, he or she will notify management who may call the police if necessary to handle the matter. A brief report on the form provided or as instructed must be completed to describe any incidents which relate to these policies. It is both your and our documentation that an incident was handled in compliance with these policies. I agree to follow all points in this policy statement to the best of my ability. Employee's Signature The B E S TTM Proeram ©1988 Embassy Consulting Services. Date (4) 5/88 EFFECTS OF ALCOHOl. Physiological and Psychological Alcohol effects the central nervous system, primarily the brain. Alcohol causes a deterioration of function, never an improvement. The higher functions are inhibited by the lower blood alcohol levels while more autonomic functions are affected later by increasing concentrations. The depressant effects cause deterioration of judgement and self-control, incoordination of voluntary muscle activity, as well as impaired vision and hearing. Euphoria, that feeling of well-being, cannot be measured in quantitative terms, but causes drinkers to see a rosier world and inhibits a driver from clearly viewing his or her surroundings. This is particularly noticeable in artificial tests of skills resembling driving, or of driving performance, when it has been found that drivers, after having taken alcohol, have believed that they have driven particularly well, whereas trained outside observers may detect a deterioration in their performance when compared with tests carried out before alcohol was taken. Alcohol removes inhibitions with the result being a diminution in the sense of caution and normal reslxaint.' An individual so influenced becomes a safety risk, taking chances the individual would bypass if he or she were alcohol The action of the body's voluntary muscles requires an efficient transmission of sensory impulses from the brain to the muscle. Alcohol impairs these transmissions. This is shown as an increase in reaction time, thick speech, and staggering gait, ultimately to complete paralysis of voluntary muscles, and finally, involuntary muscles are affected and death by respiratory paralysis can occur. Alcohol effects vision and hearing. With regard to vision, acuity deteriorates. This has the effect of driving with sunglasses in twilight or darkness. Eye coordination and side vision may be effected. Alcohol effects binocular vision. Studies have shown that the time required to attain single vision was greatly increased by a factor of 2 at 0.10% and a factor of 4 at 0.15%. Hearing is also affected in that the auditory discrimination threshold is altered. Impairment of judgement and self control is one of the most important and insidious effects of alcohol. The subject is almost completely unaware that there is a problem. The subject may drive across town repeatedly while under the influence, never having a problem with driving. This person concludes that he or she can handle liquor. However, when suddenly confronted with a crisis or potential accident situation, he or she is unable to respond with the speed, precision and accuracy necessary to avoid the accident. ELIMINATION Alcohol is eliminated from the body by two mechanisms--metabolism and excretion. Metabolism is the most prominent, accounting for greater than 90% of the alcohol which is removed by oxidation of the ethyl alcohol~ molecule to carbon dioxide and water. This process occurs principally in the liver. It is equivalent to reducing the level by approximately 0.015%-0.018% per hour. In regular drinkers this average may increase to approximately 0.022% per hour. This corresponds to less than one drink per hour. (A drink is defined as one ounce of 100 proof liquor.) The driver who goes to bed at 2 A.M. with a 0.30% awakens to go to work at 7 A.M., alas, apparently sober, but with a level of approximately 0.20%. Ethyl alcohol is unique among alcohols in that its metabolism produces nontoxic products that the body is able to easily eliminate through established pathways. Other alcohols are substantially more toxic owing to the fact that they produce more toxic metabolites. Isopropyl alcohol is converted to acetone and methyl alcohol to formaldehyde and formates. The remaining alcohol is excreted unchanged wherever water is removed from the.body; hence, it is found in breath, urine, perspiration and saliva. The B E S TTM Progran] © 1988 Embassy Consulting Services. (6) 5/88 HOW TO HANDLE PROBLEM DRINKERS A group of friends are out for dinner at your establishment. They have been ordering rounds of drinks steadily -- obviously having an enjoyable evening. The next day, you receive a call telling you that after the party left your place last night, they had a car accident. The person they hit is filing a suit against you and your business. Perhaps you sold several six packs of beer to a group of people who were involved in an accident sometime after making the purchase from you. The "third party," the person who was hit by your customer, is suing you and your employer. If you think you cannot be implicated, with these accidents, think again. In many states the person or licensee providing the liquor to an individual who causes injury to someone else while intoxicated can be sued for damages. In states that that have statutes or common law provisions for recovery of damages by a third party, it makes no difference if you are serving drinks "on-sale" at a restaurant, club, bar or bowling center, or selling alcohol "off-sale," "package store," or "state store" situation. You must learn how to spot and handle problem drinkers in your business. Some general signs to help spot intoxication are as follows: 1. Becoming drowsy or sleepy 2. Drinking too fast 3. Becoming argumentative, mean, obnoxious 4. Becoming entertaining, animated, boisterous 5. Carelessness with money at the bar 6. Complaining about drink prices or check 7. Spilling a drink; making a mess 8. Complaining about drink strength or preparation 9. Becoming overly friendly to customers and/or employees 10. Altered speech pattern; sounding confused 11. Slurring words 12. Annoying other customers 13. Losing eye contact, concentration, focus 14. Lighting more than one cigarette 15. Letting cigarette burn without smoking it 16. Difficulty in lighting cigarette 17. Losing muscular control, becoming clumsy 18. Changing gait/walk; staggering 19. Becoming detached/brooding/stuperous 20. Making too many comments about other people in .the bar 21. Impairment of memory 22. Emotional outburst, depression If you suspect that a customer is near intoxication you can (1) Count the number of drinks consumed, and (2) Talk with customers; look for any of the signs listed above. When it becomes apparent that the customer is near intoxication, it is your responsibility to refuse service and/or sale of alcohol. At this point let your manager handle the matter. The important thing for your manager or you to remember when declining beverage service or sale is to use tact and attempt to be diplomatic. Never use the word "drunk" when conversing with a customer, as invariably this evokes an immediate negative response. Show your concern for everyone's welfare, and don't hesitate to use your insurance company, attorney, or your written policy as forces which limit your discretion. Put responsibility where it belongs...on the law. The B E S TTM Pro_gram © 1988 Embassy Consulting Services. CO 5/88 INCIDENT REPORTING SHEET Date of Incident: Employee(s) involved: Information about or description of CUSTOMER who was refused service (include name, credit card #, license #, auto plate #, model car, associates, or any identifying information): Information about or description of INCIDENT: WHEN did customer arrive? WHEN did customer leave? Did customer drive? Yes.. No.. Was incident reported to management? Was incident reported to police? Yes ."' FOLLOW UP information: Don't know Yes... No.. No Don't know To the best of my knowledge and recollection, information presented above is true and accurate. Signed Date signed and turned in to mgmt.: Witness: Signature of manager on duty: The B E S TTM Prograrll © 1988 Embassy Consulting Services. (5) 5/88 COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION FOR B E S TTM PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AFTER VIEWING THE VIDEOTAPE, "LIQUOR LIABILITY AND THE SERVER," AND DISCUSSING THE . POLICIES OF YOUR BUSINESS, ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS TO DEMONSTRATE YOU UNDERSTAND THE INFORMATION AND CONCEPTS PRESENTED. INDICATE WHETHER YOU BELIEVE THE STATEMENT TO BE TRUE OR FALSE. SIGN AND DATE THIS TEST. Part One: THE LAW 1. Serving or selling alcohol to an "obviously intoxicated" person or a minor can make you liable for damages if that person injures someone else in an auto accident. 2. Your liability in selling or serving alcohol is determined solely by state, county, and municip .al statutes. Part Two: EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL ON THE BODY 3. Alcohol is a stimulant to the cenu'al nervous system. 4. The only way a person can "sober up" is to stop drinking alcohol and wait for the body to metabolize the alcohol already consumed. Part Three: COMPUTING BLOOD ALCOHOL LEVELS 5. A person's level of intoxication depends on how much alcohol has been consumed in relation to body weight and other factors. 6. Our bodies can "handle" or "bum up" alcohol at the rate of about .01% BAL for every 40 minutes of elapsed time. Part Four: INDICATORS OF INTOXICATION 7. A person at .01% BAL will be stumbling and will be close to being in a stupor. 8. Signals of intoxication can include carelessness with money, complaining about drinks and prices, poor motor skills, and wide mood swings. Part Five: THE PROBLEM CUSTOMER 9. Once a decision has been made to "cut off" a customer from any more alcohol service, this decision cannot be reversed for the rest of the day. 10. A good technique in "cutting off" a customer is to start with the word, "You...," because it confronts the person directly. · TOTAL CORRECT= Signature of Participant The B E $ TTM Program © 1988 Embassy Consulting Services. DATE: (8) 5/88 ANSWER SHEET FOR "COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION" FOR B E S TTM PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS 1. TRUE. Serving or selling...CAN...make you liable. Even in states where no "dram shop" laws are now on the books, common law as determined by court decisions can assign liability in any particular case, regardless of statutory precedence. 2. FALSE. Again, common law as determined by court decisions can fix liability on servers or sellers. 3. FALSE. Sometimes behavior becomes less inhibited, but as a drag, alcohol actually depresses the nervous system. Severe toxicity can lead to a stupor, coma, and eventually death. 4. TRUE. Coffee, a cold shower, and other "remedies" do not effect one's Blood Alcohol Level, which determines the level of intoxication. 5. TRUE. Other factors might also be: male or female, food in the stomach (slows down rate of absorption), and most of all TIME. 6. TRUE. The body eliminates alcohol at about the same rate for everybody. The figure of .01% per 40 minutes is accepted as a consistent rate for the body to process alcohol. The important point is that only the 0assage of time reduces BAI ,. The rate the body handles alcohol is ' roughly equivalent to about a drink an hour. 7. FALSE. These behaviors are demonstrated with a much higher BAL. 8. TRUE. The program also mentions changes in mood, smoking problems, behavior changes, slurred speech, and many others. Consfilt the list on page 7 of these hand-outs. 9. TRUE. This is part of the "policies" of this establishment (page 4). It is designed to protect everyone involved with the decision-making process, and it also gives support to the server. No one knows where the customer has been after leaving for a while. Documenting problems using the incident report form will also help to communicate with other employees so they can avoid serving or selling alcohol to someone who has already been "cut off." 10.FALSE. Starting with,"You .... "is poor because it puts the customer on the defensive and sets up a power struggle. The program recommends several alternatives: "I'm sorry, but..."; "Our lawyers have informed us..."; etc. Stand behind your policies ond they can be used t0 support you when necessary. - DISCUSS ANY ANSWERS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED. THE PURPOSE OF THIS TEST IS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THE INFORMATION PRESENTED. IF NECESSARY, RETURN TO THE SECTION IN THE VIDEO PROGRAM WHICH REMAINS UNCLEAR TO YOU. 100% MASTERY BY 100% OF THE PARTICIPANTS IS OUR GOAL. The B E S TTM Progra~ © 1988 Embassy Consulting Services. (9) 5/88 The BESTTM Pro_cram LIOUOR LIABILITY TRAINING EMPLOYEE VERIFICATION X~ (Print Employee Name) (Name of Company) Part of my duties will be to serve or sell alcoholic beverages to persons who may legally drink alcoholic beverages. did watch a video program entitled "LIQUOR LIABILITY AND THE SERVER." I also received written material at that time which my employer has directed me to review and keep. I agree, asa condition of my continued employment, to make my best reasonable effort to avoid serving or selling alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons. I Will check suspected minors for valid identification. I will not serve or sell alcohol to a suspected minor who does not have valid identification. I agree to report any suspected intoxicated person to a manager. I will not serve or sell alcohol to a person whom I reasonably believe to be intoxicated. E-mploye~ 'Signature gement- Thc B E S TTM Pro_tram ©1988 Embassy Consulting Services. (10) S/SS