1989-10-24 CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M.t TUESDAYt OCTOBER 24, 1989
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 10, 1989, REGULAR
MEETING & OCTOBER 19, 1989, COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MEETING. Pg. 3301-3305
3. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS.
Pg. 3306-3307
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION #87-182 FOR
MR. & MRS. ROLAND MC ALLISTER.
Pg. 3308-3311
Se
CASE ~89-844:
SCOT MC KENZIE, 4861 HANOVER ROAD,
LOTS 6 & 15, BLOCK 16, DEVON, PID
#25-117-24 11 0061/0062.
REOUEST: FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE. Pg. 3312-3321
CASE #89-845: BRUCE MC COMB, 3005 BRIGHTON BLVD.
REQUEST:
HOUSE MOVING - TO 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD,
NORTH 101' OF LOT 38 & W 1/2 OF LOT 39,
BLOCK 10, PEMBROKE,
PID #19-117-23 33 0195.
Pg. 3322-3354
REQUEST TO BUILD DECK AND STAIRWAY WITHIN A SCENIC
EASEMENT, 2920 HIGHLAND COURT, FOR CREATIVE
DEVELOPERS (DUANE BARTH). Pg. 3355-3370
UPDATE FROM CITY ATTORNEY ON MELVIN ZUCKMAN CASE.
9. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
10.
11.
12.
CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATING COMMONS DOCKS AT
AVALON PARK.
RESOLUTION TO APPOINT RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY FOR
THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT.
Pg. 3371-3383
Pg. 3384
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NO PARKING
ZONE ON PART OF EAST SIDE OF DICKENS LANE. Pg. 3385-3387
Page 3299
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF 1990
BUDGET AND DATE FOR THE RECONVENING OF BUDGET
HEARING.
SUGGESTED DAT~.S: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 1989 AND
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1989 OR
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 1989 OR
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1989
PETITION FROM MRS. SANDY BASTIEN, 2541 LAKEWOOD LANE -
RE: SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION. (MATERIALS WILL BE
DISTRIBUTED TUESDAY EVENING.)
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED POLICY ON APPOINTMENTS
TO THE CITY'S PLANNING, PARKS AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS.
Pg. 3388-3389
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 255:05 AND 260:10
RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS FOR PARK ADVISORY AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS.
Pg. 3390-3392
PAYMENT OF BILLS.
Pg. 3393-3407
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS=
ae
Financial Report for September as prepared by
John Norman, Finance Director. Pg. 3408-3409
B. L.M.C.D. Mailings.
Pg. 3410-3420
Co
Planning Commission Minutes of October 9,
1989.
Pg. 3421-3425
D. Park Commission Minutes of October 12, 1989. Pg. 3426-3430
Ee
AMM Legislative Policy Adoption Meeting to be
held Thursday, November 2, 1989, 5:45 P.M.,
at the Minneapolis Metrodome Hilton. Please
let Fran know by October 27th if you plan to
attend. Pg. 3431-3435
Fe
League of Minnesota Cities Policy Adoption
Meeting to be held Thursday, November 16, 1989,
8:00 A.M., at Hotel Sofitel, Bloomington.
Please let Fran know by October 27th if you
plan to attend. Pg. 3436
Ge
Invitation from the Legislative Commission on
Minnesota Resources to attend a conference
focusing on the future of the environmental
trust fund entitled, "Natural Resource Congress".
This will be held Saturday, October 28, 1989,
10:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M., State Office Building,
St. Paul. There is no charge. Pg. 3437
Page 3300
164
October 10,
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 1989
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, October 10, 1989, following the Board
of Review, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said
City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ah-
rens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present
were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark,
Attorney Jim Larson, and City Engineer John Cameron.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten-
dance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
MINUTES
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to approve the
minutes of the September 26, 1989, Regular Meeting as sub-
mitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
UPDATE FROM CITY ENGINEER ON STATUS OF MAYWOOD ROAD IMPROVEMENT
THROUGH THE USE OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID (MSA) FUNDS
The City Engineer explained that he has verified that the Maywood
Road improvement can be done with MSA funds. The City would in-
cur some costs for storm sewer. He suggested that the City not
act on this improvement until a decision is made on the outdoor
material storage being placed on the West end of the City Hall
site. No action was taken.
CHANGE ORDER - DENBIGH ROAD
The City Engineer reported that the Watershed District is requir-
ing a surge basin at the storm sewer outlet and this will cost
$575.00 extra. He is recommending approval.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jessen to approve Change
Order #1 for the Denbigh Road Improvement in the amount of
$575.00. The original contract amount was $27,744. The
revised amount is $28,319. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTIONS CANCELLING LEVIES ON PAST GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND IM-
PROVEMENTS (1976, 1978, 1979, 1980 & 1982]
Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-126 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF
1976 IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,890.00
330/
165
October 10, 1989
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-127 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF
1978 IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,351.00
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-128 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF
1979 IN THE AMOUNT OF $17;703.00
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-xzg RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE
GENERAL OBLIGATION XMPROVEMENT BONDS OF
1980 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,452.00
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-130 RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF
X982 IN THE AMOUNT OF $15;100.00
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY $18,900 FOR
1976 WATER REVENUE BONDS
Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-131 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR
NOT TO LEVY $18,900 FOR 1976 WATER
REVENUE BONUS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 810:10, SUBDIVISION 2(a), OF THE
MOUND CITY CODE RELATING TO LIABILITY INSURANCE
The City Clerk explained that this will amend the ordinance
relating to non-intoxicating malt liquor to conform with the the
insurance requirements for an intoxicating liquor license.
Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following:
33o
ORD~'NA/qCE ~35-1989
166
October 10, 1989
SUBDIVISION 2(a) v OF THE MOUND CITY CODE
RELATING TO LIABILITY INSURANCE
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
COI~ENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
There was not response.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jessen to
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list
of $152,540.27, when funds are available.
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
ADD ON - RETENTION SCHEDULE
authorize the
in the amount
A roll call vote
The City Clerk recommended that the Council adopt the General
Records Retention Schedule for cities as prepared by the State of
Minnesota Department of Administration, Data and Records Manage-
ment Division, in its entirety.
Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-132 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY GENERAL
RETENTION SCHEDULE
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS:
A. Monthly Reports as prepared by the Department Heads.
B. L.M.C.D. Mailings.
C. Monthly Report from Tom Reese, L.M.C.D. Representative.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at
7:50 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
,330,3
OCTOBF~. 17, 1 ~8~
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM. Members present: Mayor Smith,
Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen, Skip Johnson and Andrea Ahrens. Absent: none.
Also present: City Manager, Ed Shukle; Lorrie Hamm, Laker; Parker Hodges,
Sailor.
City Manager Ed Shukle reviewed the negotiations to obtain an option on the
CBD parking lots from Dakota Rail. He indicated that the reason that
Dakota Rail has not responded to the City's initial offer was due to the
fact that Dakota Rail was possibly going to be purchased by an individual
from Largo, Florida. The bankruptcy attorney had indicated to the city
attorney that he was not entertaining or discussing any other sales of the
property until something was resolved on the possible sale of the entire
railroad to the party from Florida. Council consensus vas to stay up to
date on it and to continue to report at each month at the Committee of the
Whole meetings.
A vegetation ordinance was briefly discussed. It was the consensus to have
the City Manager contact the League of Minnesota Cities to find other
cities who may have such an ordinance.
Also discussed were the weeds that continually grow and are visible on the
public right-of-way. It was the consensus that the City Manager establish
a plan to treat the weed growth and/or eliminate it for 1990 and beyond.
A review of the Preliminary Draft of the City Manager Performance
Evaluation System was held. The Council asked the City Manager for a job
description and his response to his job duties and role. The Council also
requested that a "clean" evaluation form be provided along with the job
descriptions and the City Managers response. The Council then agreed to
meet individually with the City Manager upon completing their forms and to
discuss this matter as a group at the next Committee of the Whole in
November. The City Manager was to check with the city attorney on the
issue of data privacy in relationship to the evaluation system and its
contents.
Also discussed was a program for listening to citizens wants, needs and
feedback, directions for advisory commissions; and developing a mission
statement. With regard to the program for listening to citizens wants,
needs and feedback, it was the consensus to develop a post card type survey
that could be available at city hall for residents to complete while they
are in the city hall doing business. Also discussed was developing a
survey to coincide with the Economic Development Commission survey through
the city newsletter dealing with community attitudes about its city and its
services. With regard to the directions for advisory commissions, this was
put on hold until the Council sets its own mission.
The next item was a proposed policy on appointments and/or reappointments
to the Planning Commission, Park Commission and Economic Development
Commission. The City Manager explained the rationale for the development
of the policy. He shared with the Council a letter from the city attorney
with regard to a policy specifically as it pertained to the reappointment
Committ of Whol Minutes
October 17, 1989
Page 2
process. The item was discussed in length and some changes were suggested.
The major item was whether individuals who wish to be reappointed to a
commission needed to be reinterviewed along with the new applicants. It
was the position of Councilmembers 3ohnson, 3ensen and 3essen not to have
vacancies advertised if persons that wish to be reappointed had expressed
that interest. It was concluded that a definition of vacancy was required
as part of the policy. The City Manager was directed to revise the policy
per the Council's discussion and place it on the agenda for the October
24th meeting for further discussion.
Also discussed was the next meeting, which will be held on November 21,
1989, following the tree lighting ceremony downtown.
Other items were continuance of monthly reports by department heads. The
City Manager indicated that the department heads told him at a staff
meeting on October 17th that the Councilmembers were not interested in the
monthly reports. Councilmembers questioned who stated this since all of
them read them with the possible exception of Councilmember Johnson who
felt it unnecessary for the reports. However, he did indicate that if the
City Manager felt that it was a working tool, he would support him in the
continuing of the reports. The others indicated that they do read the
reports and they do want them continued. Thus, it was the consensus that
the reports be continued. The City Manager also pointed out that it
appears that the annual reports given to the Council are not taken
seriously by the Council. The department head spends a great deal of time
preparing the annual reports. Annual reports ought to be given the
appropriate attention by the Council. The Council seemed to agree.
Other items concerned the condition behind the Shoreline Plaza shopping
center and the color of the Christmas tree lights downtown. It was
suggested that the Christmas tree itself have colored lights and not all
one standard of white. The City Manager said he would check into both of
these issues.
The consensus was also to not have a December Committee of the Whole
meeting.
Upon motion by Johnson, seconded by Jensen, and carried unanimously, the
meeting adjourned at approximately 9:40 PM.
~~s ec~ted,
S~'le~uk
Ed
City Manager
ES:ls
Delinquent Water and Sewer 10/18/89
33 4060 241
33 4392 572
3.3 4394 153
33 4394 571
33 4420 122
33 4420 723
33 4660 303
33 4690 241
33 4720 303
33 47~0 392
33 4750 513
33 4750 631
33 4752 152
33 4840. 451
33 4840 691
33 4842 091
33 4842 932
33 4844 301
33 4870 541
33 5000 183
33 5000 216
33 5000 271
33 5300 361
33 5360 151
33!5390 061
33 5450 065
33 5450 241
33 5480 156
33 5540 091
33 5630 422
33 5870 931
33 5900 181
33 5900 243
33 5930 245
$140.96
145.35
101.54
65.96
151.78
117.61
217.11
72.08
147.20
153.14
91.48
84.06
-93.24
64.86
276.07
135.97
96.91
102.78
149.29
100.94
162.00
169.94
79.66
97.27
105.24
108.79
96.92
82.96
134.35
114.52
90.30
93.46
85.17
117.61
33 5960
33 5990
32 6990
33 5990
33 6050
33 6080
33 6202
33 6204
33 6320
33 6410
901
121
331
782
O68
061
062
511
033
032
$118.
73.
75.
148.
152.
136.
155.
116.
113.
27
O6
26
32
34
56
66
72
60
12
$5278.43
RECEIVF'D OCT I 0 1,g&~
· . :,.Z/,,.., //, /J
154
May 24, 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88-83
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF
RESOLUTION #~7-182 FOR ONE YEAR
WHEREAS, on September 22, 1987, the City Council ap-
proved Resolution %87-182 entitled, "Resolution Granting Front
Yard and Lakeshore Setback Variances for the Purpose of Con-
structing a single Family Detached Home on I~ts 1-4, Block 6,
Dreamwood, PID %13-117-2421 0004/0005; and
WHEREAS, due to the loss of the Abstract of Title a~d
the lengthy process to obtain another, building plans were not
finalized and the owner of the property is requesting an exten-
sion of Resolution %87-182 for one year, until September 22,
1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council
of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby grant a one year ex-
tension of Resolution %87-182, until September 22, 1989.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Mayor Smith and
seconded by Councilmember Jessen.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Ma~y o r ' -
AtteSt: City Clerk
1
261
September 22, 1987
87-182
RESOLUTION GRANTING FRONT YARD AND LAKESHCRE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR
THE PURPOSE OF ~ucrING A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOME ON LOTS
1-4, BLOCK 6, DREAMWOOD; PID NO. 13-117-24 21 0004/0005.
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a 20 foot front yard setback
variance and a 13 foot lakeshore setback variance for the purpose of
constructing a single family detached residential structure at 1649 Bluebird
Lane; FID No. 13-117-24 21 0004/0005; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-3 Two Family
Residential zoning district which, acoording to the City Code, requires a 30
foot front yard setback and a 50 foot lakeshore setback; and
~t~EREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request; and
'~I~EREAS, the proposed variances are consistent with the criteria for
granting variances found in Section 23.506.1 of the City Code.
NCIS, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the 20 foot front yard setback variance and the 13 foot
lakeshore setback variance are hereby granted subject to the review and
approval of the applicant's grading plan by the watershed district.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Mayor Smith and seconded by
Councilmember Abel.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
331o
/
COMMON
(HARBISONS
3311
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND AOVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
October 9, 1989
BOARD OF APPEALS:
Case No. Bg-B44: Scot McKenzte~ 4861 Hanover Road~. Lots 6
and 15~ Block 16~ Devon, Pi0 #25-117-24-11 0061 & 0065.
FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE.
Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicant's request
For a Fence height variance. She explained that when she con-
ducted her final inspection on the fence, she Found some areas to
be as high as 92 to 101 inches from the adjoining grade, and in
addition, the fence was placed on top of a small retaining wall.
The Building OFficial explained that a 72 inch high Fence is the
allowable height in the subject location, however when a fence ts
placed on top of retaining wall, the maximum height is 42 Inches.
Bertrand also informed the Commission that the applicant wanted
the Fence due to the appearance of the neighbors yard. She in-
Formed the Commission that a clean-up notice will be sent his
neighbor this week.
Staff recommended, that since the topography of the lot does make
it difficult to comply with the six Foot height, that the Plan-
ning Commission could allow some variation to the retaining wall
Fence height of 42 inches, therefore, reducing the required
height somewhere below the current height of 101 inches.
The applicant, Scot McKenzle, spoke on his behalf. He stated
that the retaining wall was not their when the fence was erected;
the retaining wall was added after the Fence was erected due to
soil erosion problems. He also emphasized the need for a high
Fence due to the appearance of his neighbors yard.
The Commission discussed the structural issues of the fence due
to topography. Some Commissioners determined that it is possiDle
to construct a Fence running with the grade, however it would
have to be a custom Duilt Fence.
MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Michael to deny the
fence height variance due to lack of hardship, in addi-
tion, the fence ts to be brought into conformance. Mo-
tion carried 5 to 2. (Those in favor: Weiland, Thai,
densen, Smith, and Michael; those opposed: Meyer and
Clapsaddle.)
Clapsaddle stated that he does not find the Fence offensive as it
exists.
The applicant, Mr. McKenzie, stated that he does not agree with
the Fence ordinance, and Feels Fences should be allowed to De 8
Feet high.
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 24, 1989.
' ()f ,X 1( )[ 'Nl )
CASE NO. 89-844
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official ~
DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of October 9, 1989
CASE NO.: 89-844
APPLICANT: Scot A. McKenzie
LOCATION: 4861 Hanover Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 6 and 15, Block 16, Devon,
PlO #25-117-24-11 0061 & 0065
SUBJECT: Fence Height Variance
EXISTING ZONING: R-2 Single Family Residential
PROPOSAL: The applicant, Mr. McKenzie, received a building per-
mit on June 24, 198B, permit #8109, to construct a 72 inch high
alternating board fence along the back and sides of the rear
yard. I conducted a final inspection on the construction of the
fence on August 2, 1989 and found that the fence height From the
adjoining ground level was between 92 and lOl inches high. In
addition, the 6 foot high cedar alternating board fence was con-
structed on top of a retaining wall due to the hill/slope in the
rear yard.
COMMENTS: An order was given to the owner of the property to
apply for a variance within 30 days, or make corrections on the
fence to reduce the height to meet City Code Section 23.415 of
the Fence ordinance (attached). The fence ordinance sets a maxi-
mum height of 42 inches when a fence is constructed on top of a
retaining wall under the provisions of item 4(d), which states:
"Fence heights shall be measured from the adjoining natural
ground. Fences installed on top of retaining walls shall be
limited to a maximum of 42" in residential zones."
RECOMMENDATION: The staff does not see where a hardship has been
established due to any exterior storage or adjoining clutter and
trash as stated on the application. The topography of the lot
does make it difficult to comply with the 6 foot height, yet the
top of the fence is to be at the same height. I would suggest
that the Planning Commission allow some variation to the retain-
ing wall fence height of 42 inches, however, reducing it some-
where below the current height of lOl inches.
The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be
referred to the Ctty Council on October 24, 19B9.
Enclosures: plat map and Fence ordinance
CiTY OF HOUND
PART 11
Fee $50.00
Address oF Subject Property
i_5
Addition '~)~(J~) )~
AOpI t cant' s Name ( t ~ other than owner)
VAR I ANCE APPL I CAT I ON
PLANN I NG & ZON I NG COMH I SS I ON
(Please type or print the icl lowing information.)
Day Phone
AdOress
Exlsttng Use of Property:
Zoning District ~r~/
Day Phone
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes /~'-~. If yes,
list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolutTon number(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained tn
any required'papers or plans to. be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose
of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may
be required by law.
App, tcant's Signature ~/~~, d, ~ ~.~ DatedFX~ ,/~/q 7~
111111111/11111111111111/11111111117/I/1i111~111111ll/1111111111~11//11~11~
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Planning Commission Recommendation Denied.
Date 10-9-89
Council Action:
Resolution No.
Date
iANCE APPLICATION
Does the present use oF the property conform to a]~ regulations For
the zoning district t~ which it is located? Yes(V~, No (). If no,
specify each non-conforming use:
Yes (), No (Vi~.
i
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations For the zoning district in which tt ts located?
If no, specify each non-conforming use: FEAcc
Which unique physical characteristics oF the subject property prevent
Its reasonable use for any oF the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow (
( ) too smal I (
( ) too shallow (
) topography
) dratnage
) shape
( ) soil
(.,~) sub-surface
.( other: spectfy
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone
having property lnterest~ In the land after the zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes ( ), No (V3, If yes, explain
Se
Was the hardshtp created by .any other man-made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes (~/), No (). If yes, explatn~a~.~ y~.
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Are the conditions of hardship For which you request a variance
peculiar only to the property described tn this petition? Yes (~),
No (). If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?...
What is the "minimum" modification (variance) From the area, bulk, and
setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of
your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and writ-
ten explanation.
Wtll granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property tn
the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance?
PART
SITE PLAN INFORHATION= All supporttnq documents such as sketch plans,
attachments~ etc.~ must be submitted in 8-1/2"x11" size. IF larg,-_~
drawtnqs are submitted~ one must be 8-1/2"x11", and 15 larger stz=
copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough For clarity show-
lng the Following information:
Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s), driveway(s)/street access, off-street parking, and
utilities.
Existing and proposed elevations.
Distance between: building and Front, s!Oe and rear lot lines;
principal building and accessory buildings; principal building
and principal buildings on adjacent lots·
Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
Indicate "north" compass direction.
Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the
city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning OrOinance.
?l~t of Su~wey
of ~ts 6 and l~, 94ock 16, ~von
He.chin County,
c~
· 4oo'
1" =
Appendix B
23.415
Fences
Fencing shall be permitted In all zones subject to the following:
(l) No person, firm or'corporation shall erect, construct or place any fence
without first making an.app]icatlon for and securing a building permit.
The building official may require fence permit applicants to establish
property boundary lines by a survey comp]eted by a registered ]and sur-
veyor. In all cases, the City of Hound sha]] not be liable for the
establishment or definition Of property lines.
(2) E]ectrlc fences and barbed wire fences are prohibited except that barbed
wire may be used In the commercial and Industrial districts as an anti-
vaulting measure on top of a fence which equals 6 feet In height. In '
such cases, barbed wired shall not exceed the height of 1 foot above the
top of the fence.
(3)
All fences shall be constructed of durable, weather resistant materials
and properly anchored. Every fence shall be maintained in a condition
of reasonable repair and shall not be a11o~ed to become and remain in a
condition of disrepair, danger or constitute a nuisance. Fences in a
state of disrepair or deemed to be a nuisance may be abated by the City
by proceedings taken under Hinnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the cost
of abatement, Including administration expenses, may be levied as a
special assessment against the property upon which the fence is located.
In residential and commercial districts, chain link fences and wooden
fence~, constructed from commercially available materials, shall be per-
mitted. Wooden fences shall not be constructed from twigs, branches,
doors, siding or other wooden products origlnally intended .for other
purposes. Wood and chain llnk fences shall be subject to the follo~ing
restrictions:
a. Front yard fences may be solld or open and shall not exceed forty-
eight (48) Inches In height.
Rear and side yard fences located behind the front yard setback line
may be solid or open and shall not exceed Seventy-two (72) inches
In height.
Ce
Fences on or adjacent to the shore line of any navigable lake,
channel or stream shall not exceed thirty-six (36) inches in
height. Fences on or along that portion of a side lot line from
a navigable lake, channel or stream to the near side of the average
buildlng construction line shall not exceed thirty-six (36) inches
In height.
Fence heights shall be measured from the adjoining natural ground.
Fences installed on top of retaining walls shall be llmited to a
maximum of forty-two (q2) inches In residential zones.
e. All fenced areas shall be accessible through at least one gate
having a minimum width of thirty-six (36) inches.
f. Ali chain link fences shall have a top rail, barbed ends shall be
placed at the bottom of the fence and posts shall be ~paced at
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
intervals not to exceed eight (8) feet. For wooden fences, post
spacing shall not exceed eight (8) feet.
Fences shall be Installed such that the finished side faces abutting
properties. The finished side shall be the side which provides
maximum coverage of posts and stringers. Board-on-board, basket-
weave fences, and similar design shall be deemed, to have t'wo finished
sides.
Chain link fences not exceeding ten (10) feet in height shall be'per-
mitted to enclose tennis courts.
Fences shall in no way detain or inhibit the flow of surface water
drainage to and from abutting properties.
Fences not exceeding seventy-two (72) inches in helght may be con-
structed without restrict)on on the interior of any lot or parcel,
providing that no such fence or wall shall be closer than ten (lO)
feet to any common property line between abutting lots. In the
case of lakeshore lots, no such fence or wall shall .be located in
a manner which will block or otherwise adversely interfere with an
adjoining property owner's lake view.
Fences shall be required around swimming pools in conformance with
Section 23.60q.q.
(Ord. #465- 7/24/84) (ORD. #1(.)-lgB8- 11-15-88)
I I'
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
Case No. 89-845
RESOLUTION #89-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
TO ALLOW THE MOVING OF A HOUSE FROM 3005 BRIGHTON BLVD.
TO 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD
P&Z CASE NO. 89-845
WHEREAS, the applicant has requesteO approval to move a
house from: 3005 Brighton Blvd., Mound, Minnesota, Lot 2, Block
15, Arden, PIP #24-117-24-44 0173; to: 4723 Cumberland Road,
Mound, Minnesota, North lOl' of Lot 38 and the West 1/2 of Lot
39, Block lO, Pembroke, PIP #19-I17-23-33 0195.
WHEREAS, the property at which the house is to be moved to
(4723 Cumberland Road) is located within the R-2 Single Family
Zoning District, and
WHEREAS, Section 300:25 regulates criteria for the reloca-
tion of houses in the City of Mound, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request
and does recommend approval. The Planning Commission has found
the proposed building to meet all zoning regulations. The Plan-
ning Commission has approved a plan for the house which will
create a house of the same general character and appearance as
other buildings or structures in 'the vicinity, and
WHEREAS, When a structure is moved or relocated, it must
conform to the requirements for a new structure under the provi-
sions of the Uniform Building Code, State of Minnesota, Section
104, except for the current energy code requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the relocation of the sub-
ject structure to 4723 Cumberland Road, North lOl' of Lot 38 and
the West 1/2 of Lot 39, Block lO, Pembroke, PIP #19-117-23-33
0195, subject to the following:
The following alterations, replacements, and repairs must be made
to the subject structure prior to relocation:
l)
An escrow account is to be established with the amount
determined by the City Attorney, to allow the City Attorney
to draft a recordable document to assure removal of the
structure on Lots 2, 3, 34, and 35, Block 15, Arden, known
as 3005 Brighton Blvd. A bond at 125% of the proposed
finished value of the house to ensure completion of the
project shall be submitted.
Proposed Resolution
Case No. E:?~-845
Page Two
2)
3 )
4)
5)
6.)
7)
8 )
10 )
The hOLtSe is to be moved and co~pleted to code by 12-:.*~:1-'.-}0.
1'he house is to be constructed with a tuckunder garage as
per' the plans submitted by the applicant (E)~hibits A & B
attached ).
A moving permit for the City o~' Mound must be obtained by a
state licensed house mover in the amount o~ $50.00 plus
proo~ o~ insurance and cash deposit or bond to move the
structure over City streets.
Yard grading ~nclud~ng sodding,
entry stoops are to be provided.
sidewal ks~
and new house
A new foundation is required under the structure with beam
and su0port systems in compliance with the building codes;
this structure w~]l be required to be properly anchored,
damp proo~ing applied to the ~oundation walls, and founda-
tion insulation properly placed where necessary.
Construction blueprints are required to permit the approval
o~ the alterations to f~oor plans (including use o~ each
room) heating layout, survey~ information as per attached; a
cross section of foundation, and a energy audit by the
utility company.
The new site wi] 1 reouire two o~f-street parking spaces (650
square ~eet o~ area minimum)~ the survey will require an in-
dication o~ a ~uture garage s~te if an accessory building is
not planned at the time o~ the building relocation.
F'rovide proper head room~ :3 ~:oot minimum width, pro0er
risers and treads ~or both stairways and handrails to code.
The exterior of' t~e bu~ ]d~ng has redwood sid~,ng w~th the
paint peeling, the ~ront door ~rame is pulling away ~rom the
house, the ~ront door threshold is rotted and needs replac-
ing. There are aluminum storm and screen windows throughout
the f'irst and second ~']oor'~ aluminum storm at the entry
needs the stricker plate adjusted to assure closing.
The window ]ams, s~ ~ls~ and sash throughout t~e bu~.lding
must be painted and all putty in th~e w~ndows replaced in-
cluding any br'oken of cracked glass. The ] ~ght and ven-
tilation requirement ~or window area ~s proper and legal for
each of' the rooms.
Proposed Resolution
Case No. ~,c~_o ~
Page Three
lJ.)
12)
13 )
14)
15)
16)
The present, dormer wi].l be converted back into attic space
in order to meet code.
The woodwork ~n the building is painted with the paint chip-
ping and peeling throughout the structure. All woodwork in-
cluding interior Ooors must be refinished with sanding and
two coats of paint. The kitchen cabinets and cupboards are
press-board and are in proper working order.
The drywall throughout the building has cracks and the seams
and nails are showing on the drywall. All drywall and
plaster shall be patched, sanded, and painted with a perm
rated paint on the interior of exterior wa~ls and ceilings.
The structure will need to be thoroughly cleaned with the
wa~ls washed, scraped~ and painted; carpet and flooring
cleaned~ and all windows washed throughout. Any building
appliances that will be re-used including exhaust fans and
~ilters, must be in working order and tested.
The roofing material, fascia and soffit boards must be re-
placed. The current masonry chimney has a stainless steel
liner. A fireplace stove ~s intended to be used with the
current chimney. The gas ~orced air furnace will require
new []lass B chimney ~or venting through the roof.
The ~loor joists are 2"x8'' 16" O.C. ~or the second floor in
portions visible, and the first floor joists are 2"xlO
O.C. All supports, beams, and posts, including any cut or
notched members must be repa~red when the home is relocated.
The existing plumbing pipes are cast iron waste and vent
with copper and some galvanized water piping. AI~ waste and
vent, water pipe including sizing, must be brought to mini-
mum code upon relocation. The water flow +rom each of the
~[:=.=:tupes must meet minimum code as It appea~s some of the
galvan~ zed ] ~nes ape clogged. 'l'he water heater appears to
be about one or two years old~ the wate~ softener Is five to
ten years old, and the electric range and exhaust hood ape
approx[mately ten to ~[Eteen years old. The house has
electric base-board heaters ~n addition to forced a~P gas
~upnace. The ~opced air gas ~upnace appears to be ap-
ppo).::~mately ~ve years old w~th [)pc)per ope~a~ion and vent.
stack, however, the Eurnace must be supplied with combustion
air and the ex~ st. ing air conditioning and compressor
removed.
Proposed Remolution
Case No. 8?-845
Page Four
There is a 100 amp electrical service to the existing build-
lng, however, service grounding is necessary, ground fault
interruotions, smoke alarms at each level wired on a
separate circuit interconnected, and grounding of all out-
]ets must be supplied when the home is relocated to meet
current code.
This request to relocate a house within the City of Mound is
granted for the ~ollowing legally described property:
North lOl" of Lot..,'-~c',_, and the West 1/2 o~ Lot
3'~, Block IOY~, Pembroke, PID #1'~-117-23-3:B
019,5.
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
October 9, 1989
be
Case No. 89-845: Bruce McComb, Present Location 3005 BrtgDA
ton Blvd., Proposed Location 4723 Cumberland Road, North
lOl' of Lot 38 & the W I/2 of Lot 39, Block lOT Pembroke.
P__iD ~19-117-23-033 0195. HOUSE MOVING.
Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicant's request
to move a house from 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road.
The applicant is also requesting approval to reside in the house
to be moved at its present location until he can build a new home
on the same propertY. When his new home is complete, he will
then move the house to the Cumberland aOdress. Bertrand sug-
gested establishing and escrow account to allow the City Attorney
to record a Oocument on the property with bonding to assure
removal of the present structure after occupancy of the new.
Bertrand reviewed the current statistics of the subject house,
and the required improvements. The effective age of the struc-
ture ts 1942 with a current square footage of 770.
Applicant, Bruce McComb, displayed to the Commission a Front and
side elevation drawing of the proposed improved structure as tt
would be on the new lot. He also displayed photographs of all
the existing houses on that bIock of Cumberland. Bruce pointed
out that all but two of the homes on that block of Cumberland
have tuckunder garages, the same as he is proposing to do.
an attic, since it would be too difficult to bring it to code to
use as a dormer due to the ceiling height and prober ~oorway~.
In addition, he requested that t~e existing base-boara heat De
allowed to remain, he feels it is adequate. He explained that he
is creating a marketable starter home. He stated that he has
received Di~s from two moving companies, and each said that the
l~ouse would De easy to move because it is structurally sound and
it is small. He added that he considered adding onto the ~ouse
at its present location, however, it currently sits 10 feet from
the road, therefore will always De a nonconforming structure and
would only cause problems.
Clapsaddle noted that the applicant Old not have a site plan for
the new location on Cumberland, he commented that he would like
the house to be placed on the lot to allow room For Future expan-
sion in order to alleviate a hardship for the future owners.
Jensen commented that she needed more information, such as the
value of the surrounding homes, and the square Footage of the
homes. McComb stated that his house would have approximately
1,200 square Feet of usable Floor area when it is Finished.
MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Clapsaddle, to ap-
prove the house moving from 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723
Cun~Derland Road per staff rec~endatlon, excluding the
recommendation to re-configure the warm air ducts to the
outside walls and the return air ducts to the Inside
walls. In addition, a bond at 125~ of the proposed
finished value of the house must be obtained in favor of
the City of Mound to ensure completion of the project.
The house ts to be moved and co~leted to code by 12-31-
90. The house is to be constructed with a tuckunder
garage as per the plans submitted by the applicant
(Exhibits A & B). Motion carried 6 to !. (Those in
favor: Clapsaddle, Weiland, Thai, Meyer, Smith, and
Michael~ those opposed~ Jensen.)
McComb stated that he is in agreement with the motion.
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 24, 1989.
F~NT ~L-~VATI o~
l
CITY ()f ,XlOL XI)
55-;' MAvWOOD qOAD
MOL ~,,E' MiNh;ESOTA 5=3~m
CASE NO. 89-845
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
dan BertranO, Building Official ~
Planning Commission Agenda of October 9, 1989
CASE NO.: 89-845
APPLICANT: Bruce A. McComD
PRESENT LOCATION: 3005 Brighton Blvd., Mound
PROPOSED LOCATION: 4723 Cumberland Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
North 101' of Lot 38 & the W. 1/2 of Lot 39,
Block 10, Pembroke, PID #19-117-23-33 0195
SUBJECT: House Relocation from 3005 Brighton Blvd.
ZONING OF PROPOSED LOCATION: R-2 Single Family Residential
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to relocate a home on his
property at 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road. Part of
his application would be a request to build a new home on the
property on Brighton Blvd. prior to the relocation of the home.
After the home is built and ready for occupancy, his intention is
to relocate the house currently on the property to the Cumberland
Road address. If the home is not relocated prior to building a
new structure on his property, I would suggest establishing an
escrow account to allow the City Attorney to record a document on
the property with bonding to assure removal of the present struc-
ture after occupancy of the new.
The effective age of this structure is 1942, with a current
square footage of 770. The Hennepin County Property Appraiser's
records are attached as well as the tax statement for this
property. The structure's minimum useable floor area is 840
square feet.
When a structure is moved or relocated, it must conform to the
requirements for a new structure under the provisions of the
Uniform Building Code, State of Minnesota, Section 104, except
for the current energy code requirements. The State Legislature
Case No. 89-845
Page Two
recently passed a law allowing an energy audit to be made of an
existing structure when being relocated. I made an inspection of
the existing conditions of the home on September 25, 1989, and
have found the following alterations, replacements, and repairs
which must be made to the structure if relocated within the City
of Mound.
1)
A moving permit for the City of Mound must be obtained by a
state licensed house mover in the amount of $50.00 plus
proof of insurance and cash deposit or bond to move the
structure over City streets.
2)
Yard grading including sodding,
entry stoops are to be provided.
sidewalks,
and new house
3)
A new Foundation would be required under the structure with
beam and support systems in compliance with the building
codes; this structure will be required to be properly an-
chored, damp proofing applied to the Foundation wails, and
foundation insulation properly placed where necessary.
4)
Construction blueprints will be required to permit the ap-
proval of the alterations to floor plans (including use of
each room) heating layout, survey, information as per
attached; a cross section of foundation, and a energy audit
by the utility company.
5)
The new site will require two off-street parking spaces (650
square feet of area minimum); the survey would require an
indication of a future garage site if an accessory building
is not planned at the time of the building relocation.
6)
Provide proper head room, 3 foot minimum width, proper
risers and treads for both stairways and handrails to code.
7)
The second floor of the structure does not have a minimum
ceiling height of 7'6" in 50% of the Floor area which will
require alterations to the roof structure. The existing
roof has 2'x4' members 16" O.C.
The exterior of the building has redwood siding with the paint
peeling, the front door frame is pulling away from the house, the
front door threshold is rotted and needs replacing. There are
aluminum storm and screen windows throughout the first and second
floor, aluminum storm at the entry needs the stricker plate
adjusted to assure closing. The window jams, sills, and sash
Case No. 89-845
Page Three
throughout the building must be painted and all putty in the win-
dows replaced Including any broken or cracked glass. The light
and ventilation requirement for window area is proper and legal
for each of the rooms.
There are no doors into the second Floor bedrooms at this time.
There is limited space at the top landing of the stairs to
provide doors into each of these rooms. Doors should be provided
to allow for privacy into these two bedrooms.
The woodwork in the building is painted with the paint chipping
and peeling throughout the structure. Ali woodwork including in-
terior doors must be refinished with sanding and two coats o6
paint. The kitchen cabinets and cupboards ape press-board and
are in proper working order.
The floor coverings throughout the structure are in good condi-
tion. The ceramic tile in the bathroom is in good condition.
The drywall throughout the building has cracks and the seams and
nails are showing on the drywall. AIl drywall and plaster shall
be patched, sanded, and painted with a perm rated paint on the
interior of exterior walls. The structure will need to be
thoroughly cleaned with the walls washed, scraped, and patnted~
carpet and flooring cleaned~ and all windows washed throughout.
Any building appliances that will be re-used including exhaust
Fans and filters, must be in working order and tested.
The roofing material, fascia and soffit boards must be replaced.
The current masonry chimney has a stainless steel liner. A
Fireplace stove is intended to be used with the current chimney.
The gas forced air furnace will require new Class B chimney for
venting through the roof.
The floor joists are 2'x8' I6" O.C. for the second floor in por-
tions visible, and the First floor joists are 2'x]0' 16" b.C.
AII supports, beams, and posts, including any cut or notched mem-
bers must be repaired if the home is relocated.
The existing plumbing pipes are cast iron waste and vent with
copper and some galvanized water piping. Al1 waste and vent,
water pipe inc)uding sizing, must be brought to minimum code upon
relocation. The water f)ow from each of the fixtures must meet
minimum code as it appears some of the galvanized )ines are
clogged. The water heater appears to be about one or two years
old, the water softener is five to ten years o)d, and the
e)ectric range and exhaust hood are approximately ten to fifteen
years old. The house mas electric base-board heaters in addition
Case No. 89-845
Page Four
to forceO air gas furnace. The forceO air gas furnace appears to
be approximately five years old with proper operation anO vent
stack, however, the furnace must be supplied with combustion air
and the existing air conditioning ann compressor removeO. The
supply and return air ducts are the ol~er style with the suoply
air on the inside walls and the return air on the outsiOe wails.
The duct work should be re-configured to supply the warm air to
the outside walls and the return air to the inside wails.
There is a 100 amp electrical service to the existing building,
however, service grounding is necessary, ground fault interrupt-
ions, smoke alarms at each level wiren on a separate circuit in-
terconnected, and grounding of ali outlets must be supplied when
the home is relocated to meet current cone.
if you have any further questions regarding the notification to
the neighbors, or this report, please contact the Building
Department before Friday, October 6th.
The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be
referred to 'the City Council on October 24, 1989.
I- ._1
e.. ,~. 0,~
L
0
0
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Ma~,~ood R~::~d
Pe~lt ~st be ~st~ with ~ving vehtcle.
PERMIT NO.:
DATE:
FEE:
(House $50 / Garage $10)
APPLICATION FOR MOVING A BUILDING
(Please print or type the following Information.)
Name of Applicant [~C[ A, ~c~-ot~tG Day Phone
Applicant's Add~ess
(~X~ ~S~ ay Phone 9 l-ttto
Address of Mover
Present location of building:
Owner of Property: ~-~ ~- ~tc-~01-t~
Address ~0o~ ~~ ~ ~ Block
Addition ~~ ~~t~ Plat_
Pr~sed location of building: ~o~~ ~~
~ner oF Property:~~~~AN~ ~[~
Address ~~ ~~~ R~AO Block
Day Phone
PID
Day Phone
ion ~E~G~E ~80~..I,o~ Plat PID
,nsions °f Buildln~: Length ~ ~l)Width ~7~1 Height
To be moved (out of , Into , or within X .) the City of Mound.
Proposed Route: ~/,k~k~-o~ ~lJJD ~~ ~O ~%~ ~o~ ~ ~Lk%
Time DE ~ve= ~~ How ]on~ ~o be on 5~ree~=
Neigh~ of vehtcle=_ Weigh~ of load= To~al
~e DE me~hod ~o secure l~d~
I~RTANT= 48 HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO HOV]NG STRUCTURE TO POLICE DEPARTNENT,
- CALL 472-3711 BETWEEN 8:00 AM AND 4:30 PM (AFTER HOURS 544-95ti).
UTILITIES WARNING NOTICE= 454-0002
TO INSURE AGAINST DAMAGE TO STREETS
DE.SIT REQUIRED OF $
(de.sit wfli be retuYneo if nd' de.ge has occured).
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE REquIRED: Minimum amount of B.I. $200,000/
$600.000. P.D. $50.000, or Cash Bund $1,000
/~kpplicant's Signature Date
APPROVED BY: Bldg Official__ Police Chief Public Works DIr.
tved: State License Insurance Certificate
Distribution: Bidg Official__ P~ltce CheiF Public Works Mover__
RELEASE OF BOND APPROVED:
Public Works Director, 472-125! Date oeO-)
II
f~
f~
&
House Movino Request
Bruce M¢C0mb
Proposed Site: 4723 Cumberland Road
4723 Cumberland Road
19-l!7-23-33 0195
Lot 38 & !/2 of 39. BIk 10
address unassigned
19-117-23-33 0109
Lot 37 & P/36. BIk 10
4733 Cumberland Road
I9-117-23-33 0108
LOt 35 & p/36, BIk 10
3000 Drury Lane
19-117-23-33 0107
Lots 31, 32, 33. 34. BIk 10
4715 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0196
Lot 40 & 1/2 39. Blk 10
4711 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0191
Logt 41 & 42, BIk 10
address unassigned
19-117-23-33 0192
Lot 43 & p/44, BIk lO
4669 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0193
tKots 44 & 45, BIk I0
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0088
Lots 6. 7, 26. & 27. BIk 8
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0087
Lots 4, 5, 28. & 29, BIk 8
address unassigned
i9-117-23-32 0096
Lots 30 & 3], Blk 8
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0097
Lot 32. p/31 & p/vac, st., Blk 8
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0189
Lot 16 & p/17, BIk 8
4674 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-32 0190
Lot 18, p/17 & p/19. BIK 8
Land
7,500
House
9.000
]6,000 56,800 72,800
I8,000 48,200 66,200
15,000 48,900 63,900
16,000 44,600 60,600
9.000
(subdivision approved by City
Council i0-10-89, new house is
proposed to be built)
]6,000 53,500 69,500
9.500
9,500
4,000
4,000
7,500
15,000 62,300 77,300
3337
1
t'
x x
II II
X X X X X X *'~ X X
II II
X X
> ~,
z o
-%
',-, rill ~ot
IX
x x x x x x
!1
I
CIT' ' ()f ,X I()L'NI)
6'2
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: dan Bertrand, Building OFficial ~y~
DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of October 23, 1989
APPLICANT: Creative Developers, Duane Barth
LOCATION: 2920 Highland Court
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 2, Block 1, Cobblestone Cove
PID #23-117-24-41 0028
SUBJECT:
Request to Build Deck & Stairway within a Scenic
Easement
EXISTING ZONING: R-I Single Family Residential
PROPOSAL: The applicant, Mr. Barth, obtained a building permit
(#8603) on September Il, 1989 to construct a deck and stairway to
the lake at 2920 Highland Court. Mr. Barth is the developer of
the Cobblestone Cove subdivision in the City of Mound. There was
no site plan turned in with the permit, however, the surveying
completed for the construction of the dwellings in the subdivi-
sion was contracted by Mr. Barth. Upon my final Inspection of
the structure, I noticed that the stairway and the deck was into
the Scenic Easement of the property. Mr. Barth was notified to
make an application For review at the City by applying For a
Maintenance Permit through the Park Commission.
The Park Commission review is in their minutes of October 12th
and is attached for your information. Basically, they referred
this request to the Planning Commission as they felt they did not
review the easement prior to adoption by the City so it should be
the Planning Commission recommendation to the City Council that
should take precedence. The Cobblestone Cove plat was approved
prior to the current ordinance which requires the Park Commission
to review the subdivisions prior to Final approval. The Planning
Commission was concerned, during subdivision approval, of the
steep slope on the property, so the City Planner, Mark Koegler,
drafted a scenic easement example For the developer to limit any
destruction of vegetation and/or limit development on the slope
to a four foot stairway without City review and approval.
Staff Recommendation
Page Two
The center lot (parcel) on this subdivision had extensive soil
erosion during the 17 inch rainfall in 1987. Trees, soil, and
brush were taken out by the storm; fortunately, the basement un-
der construction at the time did remain standing.
If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this decking
into the Scenic Easement, there are at least two points to con-
sider. First, if the developer does construct this large deck,
will the City restrict other decks? Is there a hardship on this
lot which is not evident on the other properties in the scenic
easement? This cannot be considered an emergency repalr as was
the case with the neighboring property due to a natural disaster.
Secondly, how does the construction affect the natural vegetation
on the slope? Mr. Barth removed one dead tree and one live sec-
tion of a Forked tree to construct the deck. I do not know how
much low growth was destroyed.
RECOMMENDATION: The Scenic Easement was drafted and recommended
to the City Council as a condition of subdivision approval to
protect the environment. It is staff's recommendation to remove
the deck as the slope should remain forested with very limited
hard surface to deter erosion of the slope. I have attached Sec-
tion 23.711 of the City Code performance standards for Soil Ero-
sion and Tree and Woodland Preservation for your review.
The property owners within the Cobblestone Cove Subdivision have
been notified. This case will be referred to the City Council at
there meeting on October 24, 1989.
cc: Jim Fackler, Park Director
335&
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
I'IOUND ADVISORY PARK COHMISSION
OCTOBER 12, 1989
Maintenance Permit: 2920 Highland Court, Creatt've Developers
(Duane Barth), request to construct stairway and deck down to the
laRe within a Scenic Easement.
The Park Director explained to the Commission that the Building
Inspector requested that the Park Commission review this par-
ticular request. The Building Inspector Issued a building permit
to Creative Oevelopers to construct a stairway and deck to the
lake. When she visited the site For an inspection, a "Stop Work
Order" was posted due to the size of the deck being constructed.
Fackler explained that the Scenic Easement limits construction
within the designated easement to allow only a 48" wide stairway.
The Scenic Easement was a condition of subdivision approval to
protect the environment.
Duane Barth of Creative Developers, compared his stairway with
the neighbors "elaborate" stairway. Barth stated that the neigh-
bor received City Council approval to construct his stairway.
Fackler explained that during the heavy rain Fall of 1987, the
hill eroded and washed away ali the vegetation at the neighboring
property, therefore, the City Council approved construction
within their Scenic Easement to help prevent Further erosion.
The Commission questioned staff why this issue was submitted to
them For review. The Commission agreed that this is a planning
Issue, especially since they did not originally review the sub-
division or Scenic Easement.
MOTION made by Weber, seconded by Andersen, to refer
this request to the Planning Commission For their review
at their meeting on October 23, 1989, then refer to the
City Council on October 24, 1989. Motion carried unani-
mously.
CITY of MOUND
NOTICE
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 6, 1989
All Owners of Property within Cobblestone Cove
Subdivision, Mound, Minnesota
Jim Fackler, Park Director ~
Maintenance Permit Application
2920 Highland Court
This notice is to inform you that at the Mound Advisory Park
Commission meeting on October 12, 1989, 7:30 p.m., a Maintenance
Permit will be reviewed for approval. The Maintenance Permit
Application was submitted for the property at 2920 Highland
Court, the owner is requesting approval to build a stairway
with a deck down to the lakeshore within an established
Scenic Easement.
All persons attending this meeting will have the opportunity
to be heard on this issue.
If you have any questions, you may contact Peggy or myself at
City Hall.
pJ
An eq,Jal Cpportumty Employer that does nol d~scr~rnmate on the bas~s of race, color, nabonal Origin. or handlcagped status
5341HAYkK:X)D-~D
472-1155
MAINTENANCE PERMIT APPLICATION
ADDRESS:
NAME 'OF COMMONS
DOCKSITE #:
,' / .
ADDITION: CrPX~/'~" ~ 'TZ'J,.Y],/'~''
LOT: .~l BLOCK :
DESCRIBE REQUEST:
(CHECK ONE)
REPAIR EXISTING STRUCTURE/IMPROVEMENT
REQUEST NEW CONSTRUCTION/IMPROVMENT
TREE TRIMMING.,
UNDER-BRUSH TRIMMING
CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF VEGETATION
.EXPLAIN:
APPLICANT MUST FURNISH 'THE FOLLOWING:
One plot plan drawn to scale showing dimensions and location
of the exlsttng or proposed structure/improvement.
Type of chemical and method to be used.
.Name, address, and phone number of contractor performing
services,
One 'set of plans and specifications of suFEtctent clarity
and detail.to Indicate the nature and extent of the struc-
ture or improvement.
Photographs of the existing structure in need of repair, or
of the affected area,
Signature of APp~(Icant I
Oat /
I
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, ]989
Creative Developers, Duane Barth: 2920 Highland Court, Lot
2, Block I, Cobblestone Cove, PlO #23-117-24-41 0028.
~_e~uest to 8ui ld Deck within a Scenic Easement.
The Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the request to
build a deck within a Scenic Easement. She explained that Mr.
Barth, who was also the developer of the Cobblestone Cove sub-
division, obtained a building permit to construct a deck and
stairway to the lake. Upon her Final inspection of the dwelling,
she noticed that the stairway and the deck was being built within
the Scenic Easement. in the process of constructing the deck,
one dead tree was removed, and one live section of a forked tree
was removed. The Scenic Easement was drafted to limit any
destruction of vegetation and/or limit development on the slope
to a Four Foot stairway without City review and approval.
Staff recommended that the deck be removed as the slope should
remain Forested with very limited hard surface to deter erosion
of the slope as stated in City Code Section 23.711 relating to
Soil Erosion and Tree and Woodland Preservation.
Duane Barth, applicant and contractor, spoke on behalf of the
property owner. He stated that they have made every effort to
maintain the slope and prevent erosion as the owner wants to
protect his investment. He added that the owner wants to
preserve the hillside, and the owner has already invested $8,000
into the construction of the stairway and deck.
Mr. Gray, owner of 2920 Highland Court, commented that he did
have a professional landscape company, Aspen Landscaping, draw a
plan that would help preserve the slope; and this is the plan he
is Following. Aspen suggested removing the section of the live
tree since the tree had a few dead limbs and that section would
drain the nutrition From the other section which would then even-
tually die. He also stated that he had no knowledge that a
Scenic Easement existed, he has contacted his title company and
they are researching the issue. He said that the deck is com-
plete, except For the deck boards.
Mr. Gray added that his lot has 10,100 square Feet, the Scenic
Easement is 5,000 square Feet, therefore, the Scenic Easement is
49 percent of his lot. His house is 75 Feet From the lakeshore.
The Commission asked the City Planner's opinion on whether there
would be more erosion with a deck covering bare ground, or with
vegetation existing. He commented 'that a rock base could be
added under the deck and this would hold the slope as well as
natural vegetation. He also mentioned that the ground cover
could not be replaced between now and next spring.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Michael to approve
construction of the deck as shown on Exhibit A upon the
condition that an erosion control measure, acceptable to
the City, be placed under the deck.
The Commission discussed the possibility of setting a precedence
to allow other decks within the Scenic Easement. It was noted
that the Commission does not want this to happen. Mr. Gray
stated that vegetation still exists under the deck, and the way
it is constructed should allow enough sunlight under 'the deck to
promote growth of vegetation.
Motion carried 4 - 3.
Jensen, Smith, Michael.
Meyer.)
(Those in favor: Clapsaddle,
Those opposed: Thai, Weiland,
Wei land suggested that the Scenic Easement be mailed to al 1
owners of property within this subdivision so they are aware of
its presence, and hopefully will prevent this type of request in
the future. Thai commented that he does not think the deck is
necessary, adding that the owner could get by with a 48" wide
walkway. Meyer commented that he does not want to see decks con-
structed all along the slope and shoreline.
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 24, t989.
-O
pA~ SCENI~ EASEMENT
RESOLUTION 86-156
EXHIBIT A
THIS INDENTURE made this 28t1~ day of O(~tober , 1986
by and betweenDunkley Investments, a Minnesota Partnership comp-
osed of William M. Dunkley and Byron O. DunkIey, owners, and
ASHco Partners, a Minnesota Partnership composed of Hans G. Wald-
enstrom and Orvi. n B. Askeland, contract purchaser, and .Park Nat-
ional Bank, a federally chartered Savings Bank, a United States
of America Corporation, mortgagee of the following described pro-
perty, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor," and the City of
Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to
as "City."
WHEREAS, Grantor is the fee owner of the real property
located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as
That part of Block ! lying North of a iine 22.00 feet North
and paralle! with the North line of Block 2, and extending from
the West line of Block ! to the shore of Lake Minnetonka,"Minne-
sota Baptist Summer Assembly".
WHEREAS, Grantor has platted said property into a subdivis-
ion entitled COBBLESTONE COVE; and
WHEREAS, Grantor and City wish to enter into an agreement
which will grant to City a scenic easement for conservation and
preservation of the terrain and vegetation, and to prohibit cer-
tain acts destructive thereof, over a portion of the plat legally
described as:
That part of Lots 1-6, Block l, Cobblestone Cove, lying East-
erIy of a:~line tZ5~O,feet.::eas.~o~, ~Q~uce~sa~sa_.~g~,.~gle
to and parallel with the westerly line of said Cobblestone
Cove.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises
contained herein, it is agreed by the parties as follows:
RESOLUTION
EXHIBIT A
1. Grantor hereby grants, bargains, sells and conveys
to City and its successors and assigns an easement in, under on
and over the easement area, hereinafter referred to as the
"Scenic Easement,P and City hereby.accepts the Scenic Easement.
2. The Scenic Easement is granted and accepted
subject to the following terms and conditions:
A. The easement area shall be preserved
predominantly in its natural condition. No
trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be
planted upon the easement area, and no trees,
shrubs or other vegetation shall be removed from
the easement area without the prior written
consent of City.
B. No building, road, sign, billboard, utility or
other man-made structure shall be placed ~n the
easement area without the prior written consent
of City.
C. Grantor assumes the obligation of maintaining the
easement area, subject to the provisions hereof.
D. No trash, waste or other offensive material, soil
or landfill shall be placed upon or within the
easement area without the prior written consent
of the City.
E. No change in the general topo.graphy of the
easement area landscape, including but not
limited to excavation, dredging, movement or
-2-
RESOLUTION 86-156
EXHIBIT A
Fo
remova! of soil, shall be made without the prior written consent
of the City, except that construction of stairs, 48" tn width maximum
will be permitted.
The duration of the Scenic Easement is perpetual.
3. This agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties,
their successors and assigns.
4. Nothing contained herein shall impair any right of City now held or
hereafter acquired to construct or maintain public utilities in or on the ease-
ment area. ,
CITY OF MOUND
\\(
Its City M~ge F --
ASHco P~INERS . _
PARK N~ONAL BANK
/
"
Its ~h~_,
RE$OLdituh ob-~;a
EXHIBIT A
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SSo
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
· ~,~ The foregoing,ins'trument was acknowled(led before me
this /l~-Fr~day of
and /,( }~ itt )~
and-~~~- ' ' Jof Dunkley Investments~ ...~' , a Part-
nersh~p, on behalf of the partnership.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this ~'i~ d~ay of ~-C)~v~ , 198~, by /-/~_~
and ~.f ~~h I~ , respectively the
and ~~ of--ASHco Partners, a partnership, on
behalf 6f the partnership.
STATE OF MINNESOTA) ~ ~.. c ,,. ~n:,.~g,c
) SS. ,,~D~ L,A: ~...,.:~,,,~
'~ · '"D.~ "~'~ 'V It''~'~ ',.~'
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ~.i~,~, ~u,,..,.F.u,:,.~,,,,:SOT,~
a ~ ~ ~; n:~ :: .C' ',:. '. ,':Z~ ~ / ,
~ ~ The for~going, instrume~~~,O~~..~ ore me
and ~. ~~ , respectively the~.
and ~~ of Park National Bank,a corporation,
on behalf of the corporation.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SSo
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument
N6 t~4"y P
was a c k n ~' fOl~'"fn'~
this 28thday of October , 1986, by Robert PoIston
and Edward Shukle , respectively the Mayor
and city Manager of City of Mound, a Minnesota
municipa! corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation~
-4-
CONSENT
~lne undersigned hereby consent to the Scenic Easemmnt to which this
Consent is attached, and hereby join in and agree that their interest in
the land covered by said Scenic Easement is subject to the easements,
restrictions, covenants and conditions set forth therein.
Chrzstophe ~~
New Horizon Enterprises, Inc.
By://~ ~>j"2 '7"~,'~ · '~ -~? ~.'..~''~''
Its Chief Executive Off~
Mitek G. Roy .~ zb
Dianne R. Roy ~
John J. Shackleford
Paula S. Messer
Gordon A. Jensen, Jr.
STATE OF MINNLgDTA
,~,,~,,foregoing instrumant was acknowledged before me this/~ day
of ~"_~2~-g~.z~--~ , 1988, by William L. Dunkley, the Chief Executive
Officer of New Horizon Enterprises, Inc., a~~/tion ~/der the laws
of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of t 5ratic~r
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
T~e foregoing instrument was acknowledged b~ me this "~ d~'~ay
of ~/0~2~~', 1988 By Christopher Jo~ggs_a~erilyn~u~ner,
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nm this
of
__day
1988, by Michael G. Roy and Dianne R. Roy, husband
The foregoing instrtmmnt was acknowledged before mm this
of
and wife.
day
, 1988, by John J. Shackleford and Paula S. Mmsser, husband
STATE OF MINNESOIi~
COI~fY OF HENNEPLN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before nm this__
of , 1988, by Gordon A. Jensen, Jr., single.
day
The foregoing instrument was
drafted by:
Thomas F. Underwood
1100 First Bank Place West
Minneapolis, b~ 55402
CONSENT
The undersigned, being the fee owner of the real property
located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described as
Lot 3, Block 1, Cobblestone Cove, hereby joins in the Scenic
Easement to which this Consent is attached and agrees that,
effective this ~'r~day of February, 1989, the above described
property shall be subject to the easements, restrictions,
covenants and conditions as set forth in said Scenic Easement.
C~?don A. Jensen.~,,/
State of Minnesota)
) ss
County of Hennepin)
he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me' this
· 1989
day of Feoruary, , by Gordon A. Jensen, Jr. a single
person.
~.:~1~1["~.~ HENNEPIN COL,- .-Y ~.
1''1~D C
gNl"lc:ll~l~.'
001
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION
OCTOBER IZ, 1969
Per City Council direction:
at Avalon Park.
consider relocation of com~mDns docks
The Park Director reviewed the history of having City docks lo-
cated at Avalon Park, as It is outlined in the City Council
Minutes of May 4, 1982. He reviewed the current status of the
dockage at Avalon Park; there are Five docks, Four of which are
being shared, therefore there ts a total of nine people that
would have to De relocateD. Ihese Dock holders are non-aDU~lng
residents which makes it very difficult to relocate these docks
since there is no vacant City owned shoreline for non-abutting
residents on the "island". Fackler referred to the dock location
The following citizens spoke tn Favor of having the City docks
remain at Avalon Park: Brian Johnson of 4445 Manchester Road,
Bryan Clem of 4436 Manchester, Kathy Kinney of 3011 Island View
Drive, Ron Johnson of 4416 Dorchester Road, and Cliff Schmtdt of
3001 Island View Ortve.
There were no citizens present to speak In opposition of having
the docks remain at Avalon Park.
The Commission discussed the need for the docks to remain at
Avalon Park. They questioned why this Issue was raised, and why
these docks would present a problem. It was noted that Council-
member Johnson raised the Issue, however a reason was not given.
NOTION made by Weber to Inform the City Council that the
Park Commission did reconsider relocating the City docks
at Avalon Park and the recommendation Is to have the
docks remain as is. Clough seconded the motion wlth an
amendment: Councllmen~aer Johnson should appear before
the Park Commission if he has an Issue with this Item.
Weber accepted the amendment. Motion carried unanim-
ously.
This 1rem will appear before the City Council on October 24,
1989.
37/
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
NOTICE
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 10, 1989
Dock Permit Holders at Avalon Park
Jim Fackler, Park Director
City Docks at Avalon Park
On September 26, 1989, the Mound City Council directed the Park
Commission to consider relocating commons docks that are presently
located at Avalon Park. The Park Commission will review this
issue at their meeting on Thursday, October 12, 1989 at 7:30
p.m. at City Hall. Their recommendation will then be forwarded
to the City Council for their consideration on October 24, 1989.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this issue, and
are unable to attend the Park Commission meeting, please call
me at 472-1155.
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENt,
The Mayor asked if there were any c£t£zens present who wished
There were none.
to speak.
AVALON PARK - BOAT DOCKAG~
The Acting City Manager Fran Clark explained this item. At the September
12th meeting Councilmember Johnson stated he thought Avalon Park was
restricted to prohibit boat dockage. Ia 1977, the Avalon Park Improvement
association granted the City of Mound a permanent easement for park
purposes. She did find a letter in the property jacket to the Park Board
from members and neighbors of Avalon Park requesting they consider certain
6
September 26, 1989
restrictions. In July 1977, this property went tax forfeit and was taken
by the City for park and drainage purposes. In June of 1978, the State of
Minnesota conveyed this property to the City of Mound for park and drainage
purposes. There was no mention of dockage in these documents.
MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to direct staff to contact the
Park Commission to consider relocating commons docks that are on
Avalon Park. ~otion was unanimously passed. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON SPRAYING HERBICIDES ON CITY PROPERTY
EXCEPT AT THE CEMETERY AND CITY HALL
The Acting City Manager stated that the City did spray for dandelions and
weeds but had stopped in 1985 due to the cost. The runoff into the lake.
Currently'the cemetery and the City Hall are the only city properties that
are sprayed. The Park Commission would like the City to reaffirm its
policy on the use of herbicides on City property. After discussion Johnson
moved and Jessen seconded the following motion:
THE MOUND CITY COUNCIL HEREBY AGREES WITH THE PAEK ADVISORY
COMMISSION THAT THE USE OF HERBICIDES ON CITY PROPERTY SHOULD BE
CAREFULLY MONITORED. BUT THE COUNCIL ALSO BELIEVES THAT THERE NAY
BE TIMES WHEN IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY AND ITS
ENVIRONMENT TO USE HERBICIDES. THEREFORE THE COUNCIL RESERVES TO
ITSELF THE RIGHT TO REVIEW THIS POLICY ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
REVIEW OF LIQUOR LICENSE AT THE JOCK CLUB AS IT RELATES TO RECENT VIOLATION
OF GAMBLING LAW AND CONSIDER SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF THE LIQUOR LICENSE
The City Council discussed the background on this item. The City Attorney
explained the proper forum for procedures to revoke or suspend t~e liquor
license. He then listed the options for the Council being: 1) There i~
October 4, 1989
PARKS WITH COMMONS DOCKS
Name of Park/Beach
Centervtew Beach
Carlson Park
Avalon Park
Mound Bay
Twin Park
Ridgewood Park
Lagoon Park
Cresent Park
Lost Lake Park
Highland End
# of Docks
Ii
9
5
I (transit)
5
7
4
i?
6
9
Playground
Equipment
x
Swimming
Beach
X
X
44O
December 22, 1981
C0uncilmcmber Charon moved the following resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 81-399
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1982 DOCK LOCATIONS
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
the L.M.C.D. has granted the City of Mound 380 dock sites, and
this will probably be increased to 400 sites in January, and
the Park AdvisoryC~mmission and the Dock Inspector have made
certain recommendations as to the assignment of the extra 20
docks as follows:
Area 1 - Avalon Park has 160 fez of level shoreline, Class "D",
and will accommodate.~/dock sites ~ ~. ~-)~o
Area 2 - North Beachside has 60 feet of level shoreline, Class "D",
and will accommodate 3 docks.
Area 3 - Wren Access has 40 feet of level shoreline, Class "D",
1 dock site.
Area 4 - Centerv|ew Access has enough shoreline, Class "D", to
accommodate 8 dock sites.
the Park Advisory Commission and the Dock Inspector have made
the following other recommendations:
1. Dock site #43050 behind 4805 Island View Drive will not be
assigned for 1982. This site, previously on Class "D" area, has
become unaccessible and reclassified as Class "C"
2. Reducing the docks at Emerald Channel area from 5 to 3 for 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND,
MINNESOTA:
That the Council does hereby approve all the above recommendations
made by the Park Advisory Commission and the Dock Inspector.
A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Swenson and upon vote being taken thereon; the following voted
in favor thereof: Charon, Swenson and Lindlan; the following voted against
the same: none; with the following being absent: Polston and Ulrick;
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the
Mayor and his signature attested by the Acting City Clerk.
Att~t: Acting City Clerk
April 23, 1982
CITY of MOL;ND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364
/612) 472-1155
Dear Prospective Dock Holder:
We thought you should know that the City Council has been asked, by the
resi0ents around the Avalon Park area (the location of your dock permit),
to change their decision regarding the placement of docks in Avalon Park.
because of the uncertainty about the outcome of this and the fact that
we have other dock locations in the City open, we thought we should let
you know so you didn't put your dock in and then perhaps have to pull it
out.
Please be assured, that this in no way means you won't get a dock permit
for the 1982 season. What it means is we've run into a small problem
which we will work out, but we need a week or two to do that. We
really appreciate your patience on this.
Sincerely,
Jon Elam
City Manager
JE:fc
cc: Don Rother, Dock Inspector
May 4, 1982
REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in
said City on May 4, 1982 at 7:30 P.M.
Those present were: Mayor Rock Lindlan, Councilmembers Pinky Charon, Robert
Polston and Gordon Swenson. Councilmember Donald Ulrick arrived at 7:55 P.M.
Also present were: City Manager ion Elam, City Attorney Curt Pearson, Police
Chief Bruce Wold, Dock Inspector Don Rother, City Clerk Fran Clark and the
following interested citizens: Gary Gasperinl, Bryan Clem, Clinton Gables,
Donald Harris, Mike Lugauer, Donna Lugauer, Antoinette Case, Dave Griffin,
Tom Roden, Ron Johnson, Frank Buysse, Gary Freund, Viv|an Massuch, Verna Hasse,
Dan Christianson, Gary Paulsen.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance.
MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting on April 27, 1982 were presented for
consideration. Councilmember Swenson asked that on page 85, under the heading
Part-Time Plumbing Inspector the following be added "Of the permit fees
collected 85% will go to pay the inspector and 15% will go for administration."
Councilmember Polston asked to have page 81, paragraph 3 corrected to read,
"Councilmember Polston stated that it was budgeted, .... ". Swenson moved
and Polston seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the April 27, 1982
regular meeting, as corrected. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
WESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
The Mayor introduced the new Manager of the Westonka Chamber of Commerce
Mr. Don Harris. Mr. Harris stated that he is excited about this new job
challenge and looks forward to working with everyone along County Road 15.
AVALON BEACH - DOCKS
The City Manager explained the background of the Avalon Park area to the Council.
1. An Easement was given to the City from the Avalon Park Improvement
Association in 1977 for park purposes.
2. A letter from some of the residents in the area to the Park Commission,
dated 7-20-77 recommending the following:
"a. Keep the park usage limited to a picnic and swimming area.
b. Do not allow boat docking, or docks, or boat launching from the park
property. Boat traffic can be a hazard to swimmers, and an unsuper-
vised dock could be a potential danger to young children.
c. Restrict vehicular traffic thru the park - during both summer and
winter months. This not only destroys the lawn, but the parking area
and road access is very limited. We ask this not only for the park
members and persons in the immediate area who will be using the park,
but also out of consideration for the immediate neighbors to the park."
3. Resolution #77-368 - The Council concurring with the Park Commission
limiting Avalon Park use to swimming and picnicing.
9O
May 4, 1982
4. June 23, 1978 - Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands - Avalon Park
to the City of Mound because some $8,000.00 in taxes were not paid.
5. Resolution #81-399 dated 12-22-81 - The Council concurring with the
Park Commission decision to allow up to 8 dock sites at Avalon Park.
The reasons for putting docks in Avalon Park are as follows:
l. The L.M.C.D. allowed the City to increase their dock sites on
Commons and Parks from 380 to 400 in 1982.
2. A heavy demand from people on the Island for close-in dockage.
3. This is one of the most underused beaches and parks in the City.
4. It is only a short walk to Pembrook Beach.
The Manager explained that this item is on the Agenda to enable persons from
the neighborhood to give their opinions on allowing docks at Avalon Park.
The Mayor asked for a show of hands of the people present interested in this
item. Approximately 10 to 15 people raised their hand. He then asked for
comments from these people.
6 persons spoke against assigning docks to the Avalon Beach.
stated that:
1.
2.
They
They didn't feel there was enough room for 8 docks.
They felt the neighborhood should have been notified before a decision
was made to allow docks in this area.
They presented a 3 page petition, signed by approximately 100 people
living in the area, stating "We the undersigned oppose Resolution
No. 81-399 with moral reliance to the original Resolution No. 77-368;
accepted policy of limiting Avalon Park use to swimming and picnicing;
no boat docks or launching"
Councilmember Ulrick arrived.
4. The Park is used extensively by the neighborhood.
Traveling to Pembrook Beach, because of the narrow streets and
having no sidewalks, is hazardous to children's safety.
6. Parking on these narrow streets will cause problems.
7. Dock will destroy the Park.
The Mayor brought this item back to the Council for discussion.
Four Councilmembers voiced reasons the docks should be at Avalon Park.
1. There is no conflict between using the Park area and having the
docks in the lake.
2. Avalon Park is only ½ mile from Pembrook Beach.
3. There are 3 other beaches on the Island.
4. The Council's actions are in the interest of everyone in the
community not just some.
5. The Dock Ordinance is fair and works very well in other areas and
will work well in this one also.
6. The docks will be rented to people from the Island area.
Councilmember Polston felt that since he was a member of the Council
in 1977 when Resolution #77-368 was passed that he had an obligation
to stand for that Resolution.
91
May 4, 1982
Swenson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-130
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #81-399 PARAGRAPH
3 - AREA 1 - ALLOWING A MAXIMUM OF 6 DOCKS IN
AVALON PARK
Roll call vote was 4 in favor with Councilmember Polston voting nay.
Motion carried.
The Council explained to the persons present that the Park Commission will
review the Avalon Park docks at the end of the season and make adjustments
if necessary.
REVIEW OF ADS
3 ACRES BY SEWER PLANT
The City Manager presented the ad he has worked up for the 3 acre
site near the sewer plant and asked for the Council's comments and
suggestions. The Council discussed advertising the price of
$37,500 as maybe being unrealistic. It was decided to just put
"make offer" in the ad. The ad will be run in the next three
Sunday Mpls. Tribunes, the next two issues of the Sun and The
[a~r.' .... . ....
Be
ANDERSON BUILDING
The City Manager presented the ad he has worked up for the Anderson
Building redevelopment. Mayor Lindlan suggested that"strategic
high traffic corner" be added to the location. This ad will be
run in the next three Mpls. Sunday Tribunes, the next two issues
of the Construction Bulletin and will be sent to all the people
who expressed and interest in the building.
DRAINAGE PROBLEM BETWEEN BALSAM AND SPRUCE
The City Manager explained that the 1974-75 Street Improvement was done without
storm sewer and curb and thus this area between Balsam and Spruce is a
perpetual problem. He presented a letter from the City Engineer explaining
what will have to be done to rectify this drainage problem and the cost
estimate of $4,150.O0. This could be charged to the 1979 Street Improvement.
Councilmembers Polston and Swenson stated that they thought this problem
was taken care of when the streets went in and if it wasn't, it should have
been done.
Ulrick moved and Polston seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #82-131
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MANAGER TO GO AHEAD
AND IMPLEMENT THE DESIGN PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE
CITY ENGINEER TO RESOLVE THE DRAINAGE PROBLEM
BETWEEN BALSAM AND SPRUCE
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
MOUND V. MILLER - 1980 STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONDEMNATION
The City Attorney reported that the Commissioners determined that the damages
are only in the amount of $950.00 instead of the $7,OOO.OO requested by the
owners of the property. He is requesting that a check in the amount of
$950.00 be sent to his office and they will transmit to the proper persons.
144
May 4, 1982
Councilmember Swenson moved the following resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 82-130
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #81-399 PARAGRAPH
3 - AREA 1 - ALLOWING A MAXIMUM OF 6 DOCKS IN
AVALON PARK
WHEREAS, on May 4, 1982, the Council did consider the question of
whether or not to allow docks at Avalon Park, and
WHEREAS, decided to allow only 6 docks at Avalon Park instead of
8 as stated in Resolution #81-399.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND,
MINNESOTA:
That Resolution #81-339, paragraph 3, be amended to read
as follows:
"Area 1 - Avalon Park has 160 feet of level shoreline,
Class "D", and will accommodate 6 dock sites."
A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by Councilmember Charon and upon vote being taken thereon; the following voted
in favor thereof: Charon, Swenson, UIrick and Lindlan; the following voted
against the same: Polston; whereupon said resolution was declared passed
and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
Attest:' C-ity Clerk
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
May 5, 1982
Dear Dock Permit Holders:
Thought you should know the City Council reconfirmed their decision of last
December to install six docks at Avalon Park.
Don Rother will get the stakes installed indentifying your location and
you are free to begin installation at your convenience.
If you have any problems with the neighbors regarding your dock, please
let us know. I am sorry for the delay and appreciate your patience.
Sincerely,
OE:fc
K~$OLUTION NO. 77 368
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH PARK COMMISSION &
ACCEPT POLICY OF LIMITING AVALON PARK USE TO
SWIMMING & PICNICING; NO BOAT DOC KS OR LAUNCH-
ING& RESTRICTING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC THROUGH
PARK & ONLY SMALL PARKING AREA.
WHEREAS, members and neighbors of the Avalon Park have petitioned
to the Park Commission to restrict the use of Avalon Park
when it is obtained from the County, and
WHEREAS, said restrictions are along the lines the park }as been oper-
ating prior to donating it to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MOUND, 2viOUND, MINNESOTA: ' ·
That the Council concurs with the Park Commission and
agrees to accept the policy of limiting Avalon Park use to:
Limit the park use to swimming and picnicing
Not allow boat docks or boat launching from the park property
or adjacent street
Restrict vehicular traffic through the park both in Summer and
Wint · r
Make available only a small parking area..
Adopted by Council this 16th day of August, 1977.
77-368
8-16-77
~ ~1 oo Noo ~N
~400
$$00
3400
350O
~600
3383
RESOLUTION NO. ~9-
RESOLUTION TO APPOINT RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY
FOR THE MINNESOTA DATA PRACTICES ACT
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 13.02, Subdivision
16, as amended, requires that the City of Mound appoint one per-
son as the Responsible Authority to administer the requirements
for collection, storage, use and dissemination of data on in-
dividuals, within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Mound City Council shares the concern
expressed by the legislature on the responsible use of all City
data and wishes to satisfy this concern by immediately appointing
an administratively qualified Responsible Authority as required
under the statute.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota:
Hereby appoints Edward J. Shukle, Jr. as the Respon-
sible Authority and Designees Francene C. Clark-
Leisinger and Leonard Harrell for the purposes of meet-
ing all requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13,
as amended, and with rules as lawfully promulgated by
the Commissioner of Administration as published in the
State Register.
The Responsible Authority shall require the requesting
party to pay the actual cost of making, certifying and
compiling copies and of preparing summary data.
This resolution implementing the Minnesota Government
Data Practices Act shall remain in force and effect un-
til modified by the City Council.
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511
EMERGENCY 911
October 16, 1989
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle, City Manager
Sgt. William Hudson, Mound P.D.
Parking Problem on Dickens Lane
A resident of Dickens Lane has expressed a safety concern about
having a parked car on the east side of Dickens Lane when travel-
ing north up the hill and not being able to see if there is on-
coming traffic before the crest of the hill.
The public works department and the police department have
reviewed this and recommend that there be no parking on the east
side of Dickens Lane from the NSP pole south of 2900 Dickens Lane
to the rock in front of 2930 Dickens Lane.
Sgt. Roy and I spoke to all of the residents that would directly
be affected by the east side of Dickens Lane being posted, "No
parking between signs." Sgt. Roy and I explained to the resi-
dents our concerns and why we were recommending the no parking
area. All of the residents agreed with our concerns and no one
had any objections. No /~-k
The area that I would recommend.~b~.ng posted, " ing," is
shown on the attached diagram.
?rw~r~- Hu~s~
am
WH/sh
October 24, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
RESOLUTION DESI~NATIN~ NO PARKIN~ ZONE
ON PART OF EAST SIDE OF DICKENS LANE
WHEREAS, Chapter VII of the Mound Code provides that
the City Council may from time to time, by resolution, establish
rules and regulations relating to the use of streets within the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the city of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
The following street in the City of Mound, Minnesota, is hereby
designated as a no parking zone.
The East side of Dickens Lane from the NSP pole South
to the rock in front of~930 Dickens Lane.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
3387
CITY OF MOUND
PROPOSED POLICY ON APFOINTMENTS AND/OR REAPPOINTMENTS
TO THE PLANNING CO~4ISSION, PAR~ COMMISSION AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPI/ENT COMMISSION
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Advisory commissions serve as a vital resource to the City Council as
the Council sets the overall policies for the City. Councilmembers
consistently rely on the Planning Commission, Park Commission and the
Economic Development Commission to provide background, analysis and
research so that the Council can be more clearly informed on planning, park
and economic development matters respectively. City councils do not have a
sufficient mnount of time to study and analyze these types of issues due to
the fact that their work load in other areas is significant.
In order for these advisory bodies to function, ordinances have been
established creating each group and stating their purpose and function.
Included within each ordinance there are provisions calling for the method
by which members are appointed, terms of office, election of officers, etc.
Most importantly, however, is the fact that each commission could not
perform its duties without dependable and reliable persons who are willing
to dedicate a considerable amount of their personal time. Meetings are
held at least monthly and involve one to four hours of time commitment per
meeting. In addition, preparation for meetings involves more hours plus
preparation time. Commission members are volunteers and serve without
compensation.
In the past, there has been no consistent method by which the City
Council has made appointments or reappointments. The Council has
recognized this problem and desires to clarify the process. Nothing
contained within this proposed policy shall supercede provisions set forth
in Sections 245, 255 and 260 of the Mound City Code.
335g 1
POLICY
The City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby establishes
the following Policy:
Definition of "Vacancy": A vacancy occurs when a term expires and the
commissioner holding that term does not desire reappointment. A vacancy
also occurs when a commissioner resigns his/her position prior to the term
expiring·
When a vacancy occurs, the City Manager is directed to advertise
in the City's official newspaper that there are positions to be
filled on a commission(s). Such advertising shall be done in
the form of a "news release".
Such news release shall include, but not be limited to, the
number of vacancies, the length of the term, or request for
letter of interest and/or resume, application deadline date,
etc. The news release shall also state that prospective
applicants will be required to interview with the City Council
and respective commission jointly. Such interviews will be
conducted as soon as possible following the application
deadline. Each commission will formally recommend appointments
following the joint interviews. The City Council will review
those recommendations and will be responsible for making the
appointments.
Current commission members who wish to be reappointed must
indicate such and the reasons for being reappointed in writing
a minimum of sixty (60) days prior to their term expiring·
If a member resigns during his/her term, such resignation must
be in writing and submitted to the City Manager.
In the case of a member resigning with less that ninety (90)
days remaining on his/her term, the City Council, at its
discretion, may delay filling the vacancy until the term
officially expires.
ES:ls
.4~ THOMAS WURST, P.A.
CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A.
dAMES O. ~iI~RSON. P.A.
THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD, P.A.
CRAIG M. ME:RTZ
ROGER d. FELLOWS
LAW OFFICES
WURST, PEARSON, L.ARSON, UNDERWOOD & ME:RTZ
IIOO FIRST BANK PLACE WEST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
October 17, 1989
TELEPHONE:
($1:=') 338- 4:~00
IrAX N U M BE:Iai
(1512) 338-26ZS
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
OCT 1. 9 1989
Re:
Dear Ed:
Ordinance Changes - Sections 255:05, 260:10
As requested, we have prepared an ordinance amending Sections
255:05 and 260:10 of the City Code. We are enclosing the original
of that ordinance herewith, and if it meets with your approval
it can be presented to the Council at the next regular meeting.
Ver~uly yours,
Ci ~t~ Att~ .....
Cu~. Pearson
CAP:ih
Enclosure
$3 0
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 255:05 AND
260:10 RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS FOR PARK
ADVISORY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS
The City of Mound Does Ordain:
Section 255:05 of the City Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 255:05. Composition. The Park Advisory Commission shall consist
of nine members. Eight members shall be appointed by the City Council and
may be removed by a four-fifths vote of the Council; the Council shall
select one member of the Council to serve on the Commission from among the
Councilmembers, the said Councilmember to be appointed for one year,
commencing in January of each year; the City Manager and the Park Director
shall be members of the Commission ex-officio and without vote.
On the terms of the members first appointed, two shall expire December 31,
1989; three shall expire December 31, 1990; and three shall expire December
31, 1991. Their successors shall be appointed for terms of three years.
Both the original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until
their successors are appointed and qualified. The term of ex-officio
members shall correspond with their respective office tenures. Vacancies
during the term shall be filled by the Council for the unexpired portion of
the term. Every appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his
or her duties shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the
duties of his or her office. All members shall serve without compensation,
but may be reimbursed for actual expenses if funds therefor are provided in
the adopted bu et of the Park Department.
---~ th... t.v consccut:ve thrca ~
Section 260:10 of the City Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 255:05. Composition. The EDC shall consist of seven members.
Six members shall be appointed by the City Council and may be removed by a
four-fifths vote of the Council; the Council shall select one member of the
Council to serve on the Commission from among the Councilmembers, the said
Councilmember to be appointed for one year, commencing in January of each
year; the City Manager shall be a member of the Commission ex-officio and
without vote.
On the terms of'the members first appointed, two shall expire December 31,
1989; two shall expire December 31, 1990; and two shall expire December 31,
1991. Their successors shall be appointed for terms of three years. Both
the original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their
successors are appointed and qualified unless removed by a four-fifths vote
of the City Council. The term of ex-officio member shall correspond with
their respective office tenures. Vacancies during the term shall be
filled by the Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every
appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties
shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of his
or her office. All members shall serve without compensation, but may be
reimbursed for actual expenses if funds therefor are provided in the
a~o-~e~u ~ u Cityu u~=~~u~--~ ....... -'-~-~ ---~---~-~ ........... ~-- ~''-
The qualifications of the members of the Commission shall be those who, in
the judgment of the Council, are representative of the community and are
qualified by training and experience and interest useful for the
fulfillment of the Commission's responsibility in economic development.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
Adopted by City Council
Published Official Newspaper
WIDMER INC.
P.O. 8ox 219
ST, BONIFACIUS, MINNESOTA 55375
Phone 446-1495
P~ge No, ~ o~ l_ Pages
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO
C'i~-v nF IVlntmcl
STREET ~
Rt41
c~. STAT~ ANd zm~ ~6DE
Mound~ ~ 55364
A~CHIT[CT
DATE OF PLANS
PHONE
J.'7")- 1
JOB -h(A~l E ....
JOB LOCATION
DATE
9-30-89
JOB
PHONE
We hereby submit spec~ficahons and esttmates for:
1989-1990 SNOW REMOVAL
PRICE PER HOUR FOR SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT:
Rubber Loader Model 66 Kawasaki (4 yd.) ...... $78.00
2 - 950 Cat (3 yd.) $72.00
Road Patrol Model 14 Cat Blade. $60.00
2 - T Dump Trucks with Plow & Sander ........................... $48.00
Pickups with Plows ......... $44.00
Dump Trucks ........ $45.00
Bobcat .......... $58.00
Salt-Sand Mixture .......... $35.00
per hr.
per hr.
per hr.
per hr.
per hr.
per hr.
per yd.
We reserve the right to file · Mechanics Lien If bill Is not paid within the length of time prescribed by law. You agree to pay all cost
Incurred pertaining to lien. We will not b~ responsible for any underground utilities that cannot be located by the utility companies
or the homeowner. Normal clean-up Is Included In this proposal. There Is no sod figured In this proposal. We will not assume the
responsibility for water pipes, trees, tree r~ots, sprinkler systems, etc. unless notified to exact location prior to excavatin~. Frost
ripping extra charge. It Is expre~ly stipulated and agreed that the undersigned shall not be held liable for damages to grass, trees,
shrubs and any underground obstructions, Including pipes, electrical wiring and etc In bidding job we figure soil to dq/. If wet, there
will be extra charges based on time and material.
~t~ ~rl]pOJtt' hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
dollars ($ )
Payment to be made as follows: ~
A finance charge of 1.5% per month (18% annual rate) will be charged on past due a,~r.~u~t~/-
All material is guaranteed ,o be as specified, All work ,0 be completed in a workmanlike ~ /// / '//
manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or dev,ation from above specifica- Authorized ~ / /~'9 /_
Or dela~ ~yond our control. ~ner to car~ fire. tornado and other necessa~ ,nsurance. Note: This proposal may be
Our ~rkem are fully cover~ by Wo~men's Compaction Insurance. w~thdrawn by us ~f not accepted wrthin
days.
A reptanre 0! lropnsal-The above prices, spec,fications
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Date of Acceptance:
Signature
Signature
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
CONTACTED SNOW REMOVAL SPECIFICATIONS
Remove snow from designated parking lots and other specified
areas as soon as possible after snow fall. Deposit snow as
directed by Public Works. ~Z_R~~_i~_~_~£_~er March 1
call Public Works Street Su£erintendent at 472-1251.
2 o
Central Business District steet and sidewalks as follows:
a. West side of Co. Rd. #110, from 2365 Commerce Blvd.
(Old telephone co.) driveway north to Lynwood Blvd.
b. East side of Co. Rd. 110, from southside of 2372
Commerce Blvd. (Masonic Lodge) north to Lynwood
Blvd.
c. Northside of Co. Rd. #15, from Co. Rd. #110 east
to Belmont Lane.
d. Southside of Co. Rd. #15, from Co. Rd. #110 east-
side of Post Office.
3 o
Parking lots and alleys:
a Johnson Bldg., lot and driveways.
b 2365 Commerce Blvd. south and rear lots.
c Swift Insurance rear of store.
d 2345 Commerce Blvd. rear lot.
e 2313 Commerce Blvd. (Nekta Bldg.) rear lot.
f Koenig, Robin, Johnson & Wood Law Firm, rear and
north lots.
g. Parking lot south of railroad tracks, north of Co.
Rd. #15, from First Minnesota east to Belmont Lane.
(across of Moy's)
h. South side of Dr. Soul's office.
i. Auditors Road, all Co. Rd. #110 to Co. Rd. #15.
j. Both lots, east and west of Post Office.
k. Parking lot behind Dr. Lauers and Longpre's Bldg.
1. 24 hour lot south of Auditors Road, (gravel lot)
m. 2339 Commerce (old bank) all.
n. Road and parking area west of 2339 Commerce (old bank)
noth to railroad tracks.
o. Masonic driveway (after it's built)
p. Lot in front of Coast to Coast and Mueller & Lansing
Bldg. west to Co. Rd. 110.
q. Marion Road, all.
r. MTC lot and around passenger loading station.
A Bid Bond or Certified Check Bid.
The successful bidder will be required to post a Performance Bond
or Certified Check in the amount of $500.00
The successful bidder must furnish liability of not less than $2OO,OOO
for each individual, $600,000 for each occurrence, and against liabilit
for property damage of not less than $50,000 for each occurence.
The City reserv,,s tho rieht to reject anv an,! all
in [orma l i t ies.
The success[u[ bidder '*' ti ~end the bil in,-,~bm,, ...... fyi,-,, ,n th,, (',[tv
on a monthly basis.
These bids are to be firm for the lO%':c/ ?, I'~(] ':i,~',,r
season.
Ao
Co
EQUIPHENT ?, OPI'[P,A'I'OR
(llourly
Front End Loaders: (2 or 2~ yd.
trucks:
Single Axle, 5 yd. box.
Tandem Axle, 10 yd. box
List all other equipment to be used tor parking I,~t snow r,,mov,'~l,
hourly rate ~eith operator.
Actd ~-o s
BILLS .... OCTOBER 24, 1989
BATCH 9101
BATCH 9102
82,890.11
47,384.43
TOTAL BI LLS
130,274.54
NO. IN~ICE NMBR
t),~,'OICE L'EE ~LD
DATE ~lE STATUS
PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/lO/89
PRiE-PAiD
10/I~f8'9 10/19/89
BE1.L~Y C[~PO~ATION VEN[OR TOTAL
~E-PAID
10/!9/89 10t19!89
PFdE-PAID
10/19/~ 10/19189
BOI'~IE KIR'FZ VENDDR TOFAL
~E-PAID
I0/1g/89 10/19/~,,
CITY CO. JNTY ~EDIT ~ION VEt~D~ TDTAL
C0921) PRE-PAID
I0/19/8g 10119189
CITY ~ MOUND ~"ElkClOR TOTAl_
PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/~
PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10119/09
· COMHISSIOtER ~ ~VEN~ VEN[~SR TOTAL
01219 F'R~E-RAID
10/19/89 10/19/~
~E-PAID
10/19/~ 10/19/89
DELBERT RiJDDLPH VENDOR TDI'AL
D12~ ~E-PAID
10/19/~ 10/19/~
[~TA ~NTAL VENDOR TOTAL
EI4~ PRE-PAID
CITY
A~OUNT
583.77
5S3.77
643.11
643.11
1,.,:6.~
· .,0. O0
~0.00
.~..,0, O0
~0..00
500.00
2.52% O0
2.52% O0
~29.00
13.00
6.~
25.52
44.52
44.52
2.~37..,78
2.159,78
6.6~,.$3
6.763.44
~03.22
100.~
100.32
86.64
86,64
186.96
1.164.15
14.40
37.~
37.25
51,65
I,~)4.70
1~4.70
452,96
187.49
~SCR I PT [ L1N
LID
dRNL -CD
LIQ
JR'NL-CD
MICR~ILM 1984 ~LICE RECTOS
JRNL-CD
MICROFIL~ '85 P~ICE RECORDS
J~IL-CD
CR bltI~ ~/30 ~
JRI~L-CD
LUNCH MTG EXP-P/C
Lbl, ICH 81'O EXP-P/C
PETTY ~
JRNL-CD
SIT 9/~ PR
JRt, IL-CD
~PT SALES TAX
SEPT SALES TAX
,.i~NL-CD
I1 CONTRACT FLlt~
9.5 C~TRACT HOURS
~T DENTAL
~T DENTAL-FUEl' I RIEE
OCT DENTAL-RE'T I~E
~T ~NTAL-REI' IREE
8:T DIENTAL-~TI~IEE
~-CD
LIQ
WINE
AC, COL~T NL~BER
71-7100-9510
10!0
71-7100-~I0
1010
01-4140-426~)
1010
01-4140-426~
1010
01-2040-(~900
1010
01-4140-412Y!
01-4040-41~
01-4140-2200
I010
01-2040-0(0)0
1010
73-~-00(0)
71-~,cr2-~
1010
81-4350-3100
1010
81-4350-3100
1010
01-2040-0000
01-4190-1510
01-4~0-1510
01-4140-1510
71-7100-1510
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-~20
l'I~ 9.01.5o
F~E-PAID C~CK
AMFJUNT CHECK ~
64:3.11 ~04 10/17/89
2.,0.00 ~.?00 10111/89
~0,00 ;.-X~.ll 10117189
25~,00 ~ 10/05/,~..
44,52 ZxJ~-~lO 10/17/89
21~.78 2!;~t)76 10/~/~
6763.44 29915 I0/17/~
100.32 ~.-~.73 10!081~
86,64 2<K~..13 10/17/~
1304.70 ~,'8~ 10105/89
~/o/
.,2? VK.
INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE N~BR DAI'E DA.FE STATUS
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
G18gO
I0/lO/8q I0119!~
FI~EoPAID
10Y19/89 10/19/89
ME-PAID
10119/89 10/19/89
PRE-PAID
10/19/~ 10!191~
VENDOR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
10/19/~ 10/17/89
C, LENWOOD INGLE'WOOD VEN£~]R TOTAL
01955 PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
~F__AT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE VENDOR TOTAL
G1970 PRE-PAID
10119189 10119/89
GREG SKINNER VENDOR TOTAL
GlqT1 PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
G~)UP FEALTH PLAN VENDOR TDTAL
G1972 RE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
PRE-PAID
10/19/8~ 10/19/8g
PURCHASE
CITY DF MOUND
MOUNT
10.92-
62~.53
161.30
I~9.05
5.21-
'~5.14
80,31
~0.03
4.30-
346.04
1,I01,05
I~.61
~.96-
1.272.70
2603.41
31.20
35.85
12.04
4.93
4.93
~.95
1
1463.00
157.69
157.69
157.69
19.10
19.10
19,10
T~3.57
1.11-
.90
53.36
54.10
2'04.26
6.24-
3.92
53.38
309.42
DESCRIPTION
DISC
LIO
WINE
DISC
JRNL-CD
LIQ
WINE
DI~
~BNL-CD
LIQ
WINE
DISC
~-CD
SEPT WATER COOl_ER
SEPT WATER CDOLER
SEPT WATER CDOLER
SEPT WAllER COOLER
SEPT WATER COOLER
JRNL-CD
DEF C~P 9/C~} PR
~NL-CD
BAL DUE-WTR CDNF
JRNq_-CD
HOSP Q/30 PR
~NL-CD
WINE
DISC
FRT
JRNL-CD
LIQ
WINE
DISC
FRT
MIX
~-CD
JOURN,~L
ACCOUNT NUMBER
71-7100-.'~,80
1010
71-7100-~10
71-T100-95~)
71-71(~-~,b0
lOlO
71-7100-~i0
71-7100-95~
71-7100-7560
I010
71-7100-9510
71-71~-~
71-7100-~60
1010
01-4140-4100.
01-4090-2200
01-4280-2200
73-7300-2200
78-7800-2200
1010
01-~40-0000
1010
73-7~-4110
I010
01-2040-0000
1010
71-7100-9520
71-7100-~60
71-7100-9600
1010
71-71~-'~10
71-7100-9520
71-7100-~60
71-7100-9600
71-7100-95~
1010
Ti~ 9.0!,5~
PRE-PAID CMEO::
AMOU~ CHECK J D~TE
:355.14 2~97 10110/89
346.04 ~.~. Ol 10!II/89
1272.70 2~07 10117/89
88.95 29893 10/10/89
1463.00 29881 10/00./.~.
157.69 ~,~ 10102189
Ig. 10 ~87 10,/05f89
53.36 27~,7 1010318?
30~.42 2X/8 95 10110189
:'i6E S P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L [.~TE IL, :~ :?s
AP-C02-O1 CITY OF ~OUND TIME 9.01.59
VENDL'~ Ill'VOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE ~BR DATE DATE STATUS
~E-PAID
10/19/89 !0/lq/89
GRIGGS COOPER & COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL
H2145 PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
HEN CO SUPPORT & COLLECT* VEN~QR TDTAL
H2160 PRE-PAID
~0/I9/89 10/19/89
HENN CD TREASURER VENDDR TOTAL
IZ301 PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
ICMA RETIREMENT TRLL~T-457 VE]tI~)R TOTAL
I2~4 PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
!C)~A R~IREMENT TRUST-401 VEF~JOR TOTAL
J~.32 PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
JOCK CLUB VENDOR TOTAL
~571 PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
~Q~ TAFFE VENDOR FOTAL
J2579 PRE-PAID
I0/19/~ 10/19f89
PRE-PAID
10119189 10119189
PRE-PAI~
10/19/89 10/19/89
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
65.31 LIQ
177.03 WI~
4.~- DISC
2.08 FRT
,.%~.57 ~R~-CD
602.~
~.46 SUPP [ED 9/30 PR
.-'~).46 JR~-CD
288.46
21,556.36 2ND 1/2 RE TAX
2,80;.74 C~D 1/2 RE TAX-CO 15
24,361.I0 dRNL-CD
24361.10
512.90 ICHA 457 9/~ PR
512.90 J:(~.-CO
512.90
91.~8 ICMA 40L 9/30 PR
91.~ JRNL-CD
91
25..90 DINNER-C.O,W. MTG
~.':)0 dRNL-CD
383.50 $9 ~RACT HDURS
38~.50 JR~-CD
500.50 ~ C~TRACT ~
500.50 dRNL-CD
8~4. O0
1.3Q4.30 LIQ
4~.69 WINE
32.40- DISC
1,725,59 JRNL-CD
1,124.28 LIO
1,5~.53 WINE
38.00- DISC
2.6-36.81 JRNL-CD
1,45~.00 LIQ
16.00- WINE
29..~- DISC
1,410.40 ~NL-CD
ACCOUNT NUMBER
71-7100-~510
7!-7100-95~
71-7100-956~
71-71{~-9600
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-4320-5310
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-4020-4120
1010
01-4340-3100
1010
01-4340-3100
1010
71-7100-~I0
71-7100-~20
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100~9560
1010
71-7100-9~10
71-7100-520
71-7100-~60
1010
PRE-PAID
AM~JNT
239.57
288.46
24361. I0
512.90
91
~.90
383.~
500.50
17~.59
2636.81
1410.40
04ECK
CHECk # DATE
~,~.-05 I0!17/~9
~878 10/05t89
10113/89
L'9879 10/05/89
10/05189
L~.16 10/17/89
~).874 10103/89
29914 I0/17/~
2.~69 10100/39
2~96 10/10!89
10117/89
AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOLTO TIME 9.01.5~
U~DOR I ~',"~ I ~ DUE HOLD
JOhliSDN BROS WHOLESALE LI* VENDOR TOTAL 5772.80
L28!? FRE-P~ID 4q.O0 L~'4IDN ~/~0 PR
lO/lg/8~ 10/1~/8~ 44,00 d~NL-CD
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR 5ER~ VENDOR TOTAL 44,00
M3OgO PRE-PAID 87.~,
10119/89 10/19/~r9 87.36 ~-CD
~D CENllER ~ALTH PLAN VENDOR TOTAL 8?.36
MoI~I PRE-PAID 87,08 PLYWOOD
10/19/89 I0/19/87 87,08
ME~RD'S VE]tDOR TOTAL 87,08
M3170 PRE-PAID 2.277.00 SEPT SAC
10119/89 10/t9/89 2.277,00 d~NL-CD
METRO ~STE ~NI'R1]L CDMMI* VtENI)D~ TOT~ ~77.00
M3401 F'~qE-PAID 2t:~3.00 ~ ~ 9/30 PR
10119!~ I0/19/~ 208.~
MN RETIREMENT SYSTE?i VENDOR TOT~
~455 PRE-PAID 5~.65 ~I~ 9/30 PR
10/Ig/89 10/19/8~ 595.65 ~-CD
MN TEA~TERS LOCAL 320 ~ TOTAL 595.6.5
M3501 FRE-PAID 73.19 REDUCE '89 CBD ASSES~C4'IENT
10/10/89 10/19/8~ 73,19 JRNL-CD
MOL~qD LOIRE #320 VENDOR TOTAL 73.19
PS,.C~50 ~E-PAID 5.~4.64 P~'RA 9/30
10/lg/~ I0~19/~ 5.~4.64 ~tNL-CD
P E R A LE-N[O~. TOT~ 5924.64
P4011 PRE-PAID 70.50 REFUND E~W ACCT
10/17/89 10/I?/~ 70.~ J~I4L-CD
PHILLIP HA$CH ~N[~JR FOTAL 70.50
P~)30 P~-PAID 438.~ HO~ 9/~
10/19/~ lO/19/G"~ 4[-8..g0 JRNL-CD
PHY$IC]~S ~ ~ k~-ND(]R TOT~ 438,90
~4112 PRE-PAID 68,9.70 HOSP-~Elt~-PPD
10/19/~ 10/19/~ ~9.70 ~-CD
Ol-2O4O-0~
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
78-78~-2360
1010
78-2304-00~
1010
01-20~-(~XK)
1010
01-2040-~00
1010
40-6000-~10
1010
01-~40-00(Q
1010
01-2300.-0964
1010
01-2040-0000
I010
71-1285-0000
1010
PRE-PAID
44,00
87.36
87,08
2277.~
288.00
5~,65
73.19
5924.64
70.50
4~.90
689.70
C~CK
2~ 10/05/89
~886 10/05/8q
2~03 10/16/89
2~891 10104189
?Y88'2 10105189
~ 10!05/~
2~ 10/!0/89
2':~ 77!0/05/89
2~ 1011~/87
~885 10/05/89
~-'871 10103189
33' 7
AP-C02-01
VENDOR INVOI~ DUE HLI_D
~. INVOI~ NMBR DAlE DAlE STAT~
P~VIDE'NTIAL LIFE INS CO VE~DR TOTAL
04171 PRE-PAID
10119189 10/19/~
PRE-PAID
10119/89 10119159
PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
QIJALIT¥ WINE & SPIRITS VEI~8~]R TOTAL
R4259 PRE-PAID
10/19/~ 10/19/89
PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
ROBERT E ~)'~4S~i~ VEND~ TOT~
P~-PAID
10/1¢/8~ I0/1~/G~
STA~ ~ ~ ~D ~ TOT~
S4511 ~-PAID
10/19/~ 10/1~/~
STA~ CAPIT~ ~EDIT ~I~ ~ TOT~
PRE-PAID
10/19/89 10/19/89
STATE TREAStI~ER VENDOR TOTAL
S4630 PRE-PAID
~F"E_RAJwERICA
10/19/89 10/19/~
VENDOR TOTAL
F-I i] R C H A S E
CITY OF PH]L~'JD
~DUNT
669.70
1.61%46
173.75
34.14-
1,75%07
2.420.36
~5.70
51,~}-
2.6C5.06
1.537.12
106.90
32,15-
~.90
1,645,77
616.96
616.96
308.48
94.67
403.15
1020.11
9.828.~
9.828.~
498.33
498.33
498,33
~9.06
859,06
~9.06
15.33
26.76
~8.77
94.14
132.64
54..85
711.56
19.~
1,9~.10
DE~RIPTION
LIQ
WINE
DISC
~.-CD
LIQ
WI~
DISC
JR~_-CD
LIQ
WI~
DISC
MIX
dRNL-CD
64 CONTRACT ~
~-(NL-CD
32 CONTRACT,S
OCT HO~
JRNL-CD
FIT 9/30 PR
JRNL-CD
CR L~ION 9/30 PR
JRNL-CD
,~ QTR SLIR~A~E
~NL-CD
C~SDLINE
GASO, INE
GASDLI~
~SDLINE
GASDLINE
GASOLINE
C, ASDL I~
GASOLINE
FILM
JR~-CD
I%5,10
J 0 U ~' N A L
NUMBER
71-7100-9510
71-7100-95~
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9530
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-~5~
71-7100-9560
71-7100-9540
1010
01-4340-3100
1010
01-4340-3100
01-4340-1510
1010
01-~40-0000
1010
01-2040-00(0)
1010
01-~22-0000
1010
[;ATE iC- ,:,~
Ti~ 9.01.57
PRE-PA I D CHECk:
AMDUNT CHECg 0 DAlE
1759.07 29870 10/03/89
26~.06 ~.~.98 10/10/89
1645,77 ~.~..~ 10/17/89
616.96 ~72 10/03/~
403.15 2~912 10/17/89
98~.93 29875 10/05/~
4~.~ 2Lc~84 I0/05/~
859.06 ~ 10/10/89
01-4190-~10 '
01-4~0-2210
01-42~-2210
01-4340-2210
~-4170-~10
73-7300-~10
78-7800-2210
01-4140-2210
01-4140-2200
1010 1,%75.10 298~ 10/02'
~PoC02-0!
VENDOR INVOICE DUE ~LD
NO. I~OICE ~iSR DATE DATE STATUS
PURCHASE
CIT¥~MDL)~D
AMOUNT [ESCR IPT ION
JOURNAL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
DATE I 0 '~ ';,.':':
TIME 9,01,5~
CHEO.' 0 DATE
USlO0 PRE-PAID
10119189 10119189
UNII'DO RENTAL SYSI'EM VENDOR TOTAL
TOTAL ALL VENDORS
~.2.97 SEPT TOWELS
151.25 SEPT RUGS
1Sq).O6 SEPT UNIFOR~US
27.61 SEPT UNIFOAMS
70.56 SEPT UNIFORMS
70,56 SEPT UNIFORMS
62,00 RED RAGS
2,73 RAGS
5~.°5,7¢ JRNL-CD
585,74
82.890,
0!-4290-2250
01-42~-22(X~
01-4280-2240
01-4~0-2240
73-7300-2240
78-7800-2240
01-4:740-~00
2-4170-2200
1010
595.74
'" 9
,~). 4 10/1078~.
6~-~02-01
tE'NDOR
ND. INtq)ICE NMBR
AO060
IN'~l]I CE DUE HOLD
OATE DATE STATUS
)CRO-MN
A(X182
10!19/89 10119/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/IQ/89
AERIAL PAINTING. INC VENDOR TOTAL
A0190
ALLIED BLACktop CO
A0240
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10119189 10119/89
AMERICAN WATERW(]~I<S ASSN
ANCHOR PAF~ER
B0535
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89
BARCO M~NICIPAL PROL~JCTS.* VENDOR TOTAL
B0540
BATHKE COMPANY
~77
10/19189 10119189,
VENI)O~ TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89
BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS OF M VENDOR TOTAL
BO600
10/19/89 10/19/89
~".~ :J HGS E ~ - - ~"~L
CITY OF MOUND
AMOUNT
I5.~
20.73
.'--Q. 12
· .0.5~
15.28
7.64
7.64
7.64
189.85
189.~
70.00
70.00
70.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
58.00
58.00
2~.68
292.68
292.68
45.96
45.96
45.96
7.50
7.50
12.50
2.50
30.00
4.577.65
4.577.65
4577.65
59.00
136.00
35.00
230.00
DESCRIPTION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE B_mPPL IES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPM. IES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SL~I~L IES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
JRNL-CD
PAINT PDLE-LYNWOOD
JRNL-CD
BLACKTOP
JRNL-CD
'90 OLES-AWWA
d~'l~.-CD
XEROX PAPER
JRNL-CD
HIP BOOTS
dRNL-CD
SEPT OXYGEN
SEPT OXYGEN
SEPT OXYGEN
SEPT OXYGEN
JRNL-CD
SEPT RECYCLE SER¥
JR~I,-CD
SEPT GAP~QGE-FIRE
SEPT GARBAGE-PW & EXTRA
SEPT GARBAGE-SII~'ET
JRNL-CD
ACCOUNT NUMBER
01-4040-2100
01-4090-21~
01-4140-2100
01-4190-2100
01-4340-2100
01-4~0-2100
71-7100-2100
73-7300-2100
78-7800-2100
1010
01-4280-4200
1010
01-4280-~40
1010
73-7300-4130
1010
01-4320-2100
1010
78-7800-~00
1010
73-7300-2200
78-7800-2200
01-4290-2200
O1-4290-2200
1010
01-4270-4200
1010
22-4170-3750
01-4290-3750
01-4~0-3750
1010
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
TIME 10.58.40
CHECK
CHECK # DATE
F';,SE ;' PU~CH~SE JOUF, N~L
AP-CO~-O! CITY OF MOUND
INVOICE ~ ~D
1.~2.22 F~OCES ~IL-PW
C.S. M~R~SAN CONSTR~TIO V~OR TOTt 1562.22
C(~ 58.63 SEPT HD~ ~IES
32.17 ~PT H~ ~IES
7.~ ~PT H~ S~IES
10.78 ~PT ~WE ~IES
6.~ ~PT HI~ ~LIES
2~.76 ~PT H~ S~LIES
15.~ ~PT H~ S~IES
3.59 ~PT ~ ~J~LIES
8.49 ~l ~ S~IES
17.94 ~ASS SEED
36.77 ~PT HD~ ~IES
I0/19/~ I0/1~/~ 221.61 JR~-CD
~ TDT~
CDAST TO COAST
C~PUTDS~ERV ICE INC
C1010
COMMUNICATION AUDITOR
C1079
10119/89 10/Ig/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10119189 10/19/89,
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/~
CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE VENDOR TOTAL
31150
O J EXCAVATING
01169
10119189 10/19/~
VENI)DR TOTAL
221.61
907.0X) COMPUTER LEASE
5~5.~ COlt~UTER MAINT
1.452.3 JRNL-CD
1452.~
56.14 PACER REPAIR
56.14 JRNL-CD
56.14
200.36 TELEPHONE
320.57 TELEPHONE
2.31 TELEPHDNE
6.05 TELEPHDNE
.75 TELEPHDNE
1.16 TELEPHONE
63.71 TELEPHDNE
63.39 TELEPHONE
118.~ TELEPHDNE
31,70 TELEPHONE
140.~ TELEPHONE 63.96 TELEPHONE
67.70 TELEPHONE-COmPUTER
1.081.49 J~NL-CD
1081.49
95.00 B_ACK DIRT-CEMETERY
95.00 ,JRNL-CD
350.00 CERT C(~JRSE-Ht~GETT
60-6000-53(>.q
1010
01-4280-2200
01-42~-2300
01-4290-2250
01-4290-2300
01-4~20-2200
01-4340-2200
01-4340-~00
01-4340-~10
73-7t~X)-~O0
~-4170-2200
1010
01-4095-5000
01-40~5-3800
1010
~-4170-38~
I010
01-4140-3220
01-4,~0-~20
01-4040-32'20
01-4090-3~0
01-4340-~20
01-4060-2200
01-4~40-3220
01-4280-3220
73-7300-3220
78-7800-~
71-7100-.~-~0
~-4170-~2"0
22-4170-3~
1010
~-8000-257~
I010
01-41~-4110
[;ATE 10,'?,'~:'~
TIME 10.58.40
PRE-PAID C)'ECK
3 ol
AP-C02-01
VEN~DR IN~]ICE DUE WDLD
NO. INVOICE NHBR DATE DAlE STATUS
10/19/89 10/1~/~
DAk'DTA CD TEO~ICAL INSTI* VENDOR TOTAL
01170
DAKOTA RAIL INC
DI$~
DUANE'S 66 SEn/ICE
F1530
FFFD RITE CDNIROLS
F1548
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
I0/19/89 I0/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10119189 10119/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 I0/19/89
FINAL TOUCH SERVICES. INC UENDOR TOTAL
F17~
10/19/89 10/19/89
FRAhI( MADDEN & ASSOC VENDOR TOTAL
Ol~5
10/19/89 10/19/89
60FqHER STATE O~E-CALL, INC ~ TOTAL
H21~
10/19/89 10/19/89
~ENN CO PUBLIC RECORDS VENDOR TOTAL
J~4~l
J & S CLEANING CO.
J24~0
J B DISFRIBUTING
J2460
J P COOKE CD
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF MOUND
AMOUNT DESCRIPTI~
:~0,00 JRNL-CD
350.00
~05.65 RR LE~E TO ll/1S
2~4.~ ~ LEASE TO 11/15
613.00 ,~NL-CD
613.00
36.02 LP GAS
.36,02 JRNL-CD
36.02
579.77 Pt~ REPAIR
579.77 J~NL-CD
579.77
165.00 WINDOW WASHING-C HALL
165.00 ~NL-CD
165.00
2.678.35 AUG-SEPT ARBITRATION
2.678,35 JRNL-CD
2678.35
~5.00 SEPT ONE-CALL
325.00 JR~.-CD
325.00
230.00 DEEDS & CERT-COBBLESTDNE
20.50 DEED - SINQ. AIR CT
~0.50 J~NL-CD
590,00 ~T JA~ITOR SERV
590.00 dRNL-CD
590.00
82.12 CLEANERS
82.12 ~UIL-CD
~.12
79.~ DOG TAGS
79.55 JRNL-CD
79..~
ACCOUNT NUMBEB
1010
40-6000-3910
01-4320-3910
1010
0142~-2200
1010
73-7300-~60
~010
01-43~-3800
1010
01-4~9-4100
I010
73-7300-4200
1010
01-~00-0962
01-41~-3100
1010
01-4320-4210
1010
01-4290-2~
1010
01-4140-~00
1010
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
TIME 10.58.40
CI~CK
CHEC~ (l DATE
:AlE 4
VENDOR
NO. INVOICE NMBR
,.F2533
JOHN BREI TNER
J25.60
INVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE DATE STATUS
I0/1~/89 1011'~/87
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89.
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89
JO~Bt L NORMAN VENDOR TOTAL
~600
10119189 10119189
JOYCE NELSON VENDOR TOTAL
K2720
10/19/89 10/19/89
K..qAOMER CD. VENDOR TOTAL
L2811
10/19/89 10/19/89
LARSDN PRINTING & GRAPHICS V1ENDOR TOTAL
L3BSO
t0/19/~ I0/19/~
LEONARD HARRELL VENDOR TOTAL
L2O10
10/19/89 10/19/~
LINOA STRONG VENDOR TOTAL
L£'P30
10/19/89 10/19/89,
LOWELL'S ALFFOMOTIVE/ZITCD* ;~ENDOR TOTAL
MASYS CORPORATION
~060
10/19/89 10/19/~
VENDOR TOTAL
I0/19/89 10/19/~
~'U F,: C H A S E JOURNAL
CITY OF MOUND
AMOUNT ' DESCRIPTION
6.05 M ILEAOE
6.O5 J~L-CD
6.~i
J.-,Q. 15
PLMB INSP
~%15 Ji~4L-CD
33% 15
~.~..24 GFDA CONF
40.20 [3FOA MTGS
101.14 CSI USER MTO
374.~ JRNL-CD
374.59
MILEAGE-RECYCLE M[G
7.~ JR~-CD
7.~
34.03 MOWER P~T
34,03 JRNL-CD
34.03
78.9g WORK ORDERS
78.~ JR,-CD
78.~
118.00 ~0-11-12 ROT~Y-HAF~RE-LL
118.00
118.~
16.~ ~0 EXP-STRONG
16,~
16.~
! .0~.85 SEPT HI}~E
125.~ SEPT HOWE
1.161.13 JRNL-CD
1161.13
1~.00 NOV ENFGRS MAINT
125.00 ul~NL-CD
1~;.00
52,50 SEPT TOW CHARGES
52.50 JRNL-CD
AL~T NUMBER
71-7100-~00
1010
I010
01-4090-4110
01-4090-41~
0!-40~-4110
1010
01-4270-412~
1010
01-4340-2310
1010
73-7300-21~
I010
01-4140-4130
I010
01-4060-411~
1010
01-4290-2310
~-4170-22(X}
1010
01-4095-38,..00
lO]O
01-4140-4240
1010
DATE 10/I~/?
TIME 10.58.40
PRE-PAID OEO(
AMOUNT CHECY ~ DATE
3qa3
F~]E 5
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR
NO. INVDICE ~'IBR
MARTIN'S NAVARRE 6.6
M3050
INVDICE DLE HDLD
DATE DATE STATUS
VENDOR TOTAL
10119/89 10/19/89
.MCCD~D)S FRANK. ROOS A~DCI* VENDOR TOTAL
M3171
10/19/89 10/19/89
METRO WEST INSPECTION SERt VENDOR TOTAL
MGIA
M32®
MID-CENTRAL. INC
M3~O
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10119/89
VENDOR TOTAL
NIr~EGASCD
NATL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN
,'Q710
10/19/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
10119/89 10/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MOUND
52.50
92.00
90.00
~8.00
780, O0
46.00
30.00
5~.00
270.00
I,~1,00
60,00
30,00
:~,00
1~.00
lQ6.00
47~7,00
~0,00
65.00
65.00
65.00
40.10
47.17
30.66
10.~:
12.79
43.71
11.99
196,80
196.80
39.60
39.60
DESCRIPTION
SEt:'T ENGR-GRA~AM
SEPT ENGR-GLENWOOD RD
SEPT ENGR-VFW
SEPT ENGR
SEPT ENGR-CD I10
SEPT ENGR-CBD LANS/MUELLER
SEPT ENOR-LOST LAKE
SEPT ENOR-MSA
SEPT ENGR-DENBIGH
SEPT ENGR-78 STREETS
SEPl ENGR-CIT¥ HALL ADDTN
SEPT ENGR-
SEPT ENOR-
SEPT ENGR-
~EPT ENGR-
SEPT ENGR-CATALYST ESCR
SEPT ENGR-PELICAN PT ESCR
SEPT ENGR-COMHERCE SQUARE ESCR
JRNL-CD
7-8-9 INSPECTIONS
JR~-CD
CRIME SEMINAR-MCKINLEY
JRNL-CD
CUSHIDNS
dRNL-CD
SEPT GAS
SEPT GAS
SEPT GAS
SEPT GAS
SEP! GAS
SEPT GAS
SEPT GAS
JRNL-CD
FIRE PREVENT F'KG
JRNL-CD
8,37 PAINT
ACCOUNT NUMBER
01-4170-3100
01-4190-3100
01-4190-3100
01-4190-3100
60-6090-3100
60-6000-3100
60-6~q00-3100
26-5700-3100
26-~00-3100
26-5700-3100
01-4320-3100
01-4040-3100
01-4280-3100
73-7300-3100
78-7800-3100
01-~00-0905
01-~,00-0973
M-5600-3100
1010
01-4190-3100
1010
01-4140-4110
1010
~-4170-~00
1010
01-4280-37~
73-7300-3720
78-7~-3720
01-4320-3720
01-4340-37~
~-4170-3720
71-7100-372~
1010
~-4170-22~
1010
73-7300-2200
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
DAFE I0..
TIME 10,~8.40
CHECK,
CHECK ! DATE
AP-C02-O! CITY OF MOUND TIME 10.58.40
VENDOR I h'~ I L'E DUE HOLD
NO. INVOI~ ~M~ DATE DATE STATUS
10/19/~ 10/19/87
NAVARRE h~RDNAIq~ VENDOR TOTAL
N3740
I011~/~ 10/19/89.
~q~ SIONS ~N~O~ TOT~
10/19/89 10/19/~
N~T~4 STATES ~R ~ VEN~ TOT~
N'~02
I0/19/~ 10/19/~
~T~N STA~S ~ ~ TOT~
P~9
~0/19/89 I0/19/~
P~ OIL. !~ ~N~ TOT~
P4OgO
~0/19/~ I0/19/~
P~ ~ E~I~E~ ~ ~N~ TOTAL
P~
10/19/89 ~0/19/~
PRACTI~ ~T ~PTS ~ TOT~
R4245
RICHARD L ~ON ~ TOTAL
R42&O
10/19/~ 10/19/89
RO~T SH~T ~N~ TOTAL
~41~5
10/]9/89 10/19/~
~ IN[~TRIES ~R TOTAL
S43~
10/19/8g 10/19/~
~I~ ~AZ~ ~ TOT~
~L'~NT [£SC~IPTION
49.3~ NUTS,BOLTS
10.87 BULBS
68.62 JRNL-CD
68.62
590,00 BRACKETS
590.00 d~NL-CD
590.00
80.01 SEPT ELEC
130.87 SEPT ELEC
210.88 JRNL-CD
210.88
4,768.59 OCT ELEC
4,768.59 JRNL-CD
4768.$9
.50.88 ANTIFREEZE
50,88 J~NL-CD
50.88
102.61 AIR CYLINDER
102.61 JRNL-CD
102.61
500.00 POLICE ARBITRATION
500.00 JRNL-CD
14.~ MACQUEN EXPO-R JO~ISON
14.30 dBNL-CD
1;.30
8.60 WTR SCHOOL EXP-SHANLEY
8.60 dRNL-CD
8.60
1.240.32 RECYCLE CONTAINERS
1,240.~ JR~_-CD
1240.~
2,300.66 NOV RENT
2.300.66 dRNL-CD
ACCOUNT NUMBER
73-7300-2300
78-7800-2~00
I010
O1
lOlO
73-7900-3710
78-7800-3710
1010
01-4280-3710
1010
01-4280-22.50
1010
01-4280-~10
1010
01-4399-4100
lOlO
75-7500-4110
I010
1010
01-4270-~00
1010
?i-?100-3~20
1010
~-PAID
CHECK # ['ATE
cF'-C02-OI
VENDQ~
~0, INt~]ICE NMBR
PRINTING
S4560
STEElt~ ELECTRIC CO
$;610
~B~ TIRE CO
S4630
INVOI~ DUE HDLD
DAI'E DATE STA~S
10/19/89 10/19/89
'~DR TOTAL
10119189 10119189
~NDDR TOTAL
I0/19/89 !0/19/89
'w~'NDO(~ TOTAl.
I0/19/89 10/19/89
~IEBEIOR TOTAL
EiiJPERAMER I~
Ta716
~IES TO GO
T4810
I0/19/89 I0/19/89
VENDOR TOTAL
I0/19/89 10/19/89
VENLIOR TOTAL
10119189 10/19/~
TIMB~WALL L~CAPING
~2qO
VILLAGE ~LET
~1430
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/1~189
VEND(IR TOTAL
10119/89 10119189
PU;CHASE
CITY OF MOUND
t~OUNT [ESCRIPTI~
216.~ Z~ING CODE BDOKS
9.75 FAX EXPE~E
~6.60 JRNL-CD
226.60
5.~ CCH SCHOOL EXP-GRAND
5.75 O~NL-CD
5.75
48.80 ~CEPTO. BY POND ~
1,8~8.16 ~IEW LIF)' STA RE'PAIR
1.8%.96 JRhL-CD
18%.96
913.52 TIRES
913.52 JRI~.-CD
913.52
¢51.64 AUG-SEBT GASOLINE
~.~ ALEi-SEPT ~SDLI~
~.75 AUO-SEPT GASOLINE
408.01 AUO-SEPT OPb'q]LI~
248.~ AUG-SEPT GASDLINE
156.66 AUG-SEPT GASOLI~
214.71 AU~-SEPT GASOLINE
1.076.96 A~JG-SEPT ~SDLI~
13.73 MAP
2.43 BATI'~I ES
3.49 DATTERIES
2,~7.89 JR~&-CD
26~7,8~
65.87 TEMP NELP
31.~ TEMP HELP
97.75 JRNI.-CD
9%75
510.50 TIMBERS-PEMBROKE Pi( IMPROV
510.50 JR&t-CD
510.50
16.74 SEAL KIT
16.74 ,.MRNL-CD
16.74
716.21 P~TS F~ WELL 3
716.21 ~-CD
0!-4190-2120
01-40~-~00
1010
01-4140-41~
1010
01-42~-42(~
78-7800-4200
lOlO
01-4340-2310
I010
01-4340-~10
01-41~-~I0
01-4~0-~10
01-42'80-~10
73-7~0-2210
78-7800-2210
22-~170-2210
01-41~-~I0
01-4270-2100
73-7300-~00
OI-41~-~(X)
lOIO
01-4270-13C,0
73-7300-1300
1010
01-43~-4100
1010
73-7300-2300
1010
73-7300-2300
1010
~E-PAID
~L1UNT
[~TE i(! :: ?
TIME 10.58,a0
C~ECK # DATE
AP-C02-O! CITY OF MOU~D T[~ ~0..., =o:,.,._,&o
'~ENDDR I h~,~ ! CE
NO. IN~q]ICE
DLE HOLD
[IATE STATUS
WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY
w563o
WIDMF. R
5690
VEN~]R TOTAL
10/10/~ 10/1Q/~
VENDO~ TOTAL
WM ~LLER & SONS
W5700
10/19/89 10/19/8g
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/89
WURST-PE~S~-LA~ VENDOR TOTAL
X5750
XEROX COFbr-1]PJT I ~
Z ~
D',~K'S INC
Z6070
MICHAEL PALM
10/19/~ 10/19/~
VENDOR TOTAL
10/19/89 10/19/~
VENDOR TOTAL
10/1~/~ 10/1~/~
VENDOR TOTAL
TOTAL ALL VENDO~
AP~T DESCRIPTION
7!6.21
204.C~9 LmNDERLAY-FNEMBROKE FNK IMF-N~DV
204.00
~4.00
1.~61.82 BLACKT~
435.96 BLACkffOP
1.425.85 FILL SAND
3,823.63 dR,-CD
.?823.63
1,644.50 SEPT PROSECUTION
1,644.50 JRNL-CD
1644.50
303.~ ~Y I~,LUE~RICANT FOR XEROX
48~.~ FINAL MAINT-~
789.59 dt~t4L -CD
7~3<),59
~.32 BUNGE.BRO0~ ETC
8%32 JR~_-CD
11.42 MCDONALD TAE
4~.00 ~ TE~-PALM
~6.42 dRNL-CD
5~.42
47.384.43
ACC~UNTNU~ER
01-4~-4100
1010
01-4280-284~
73-7300-~40
73-73~-~40
1010
01-4110-3120
1010
01-43~-~00
01-43"20-3800
1010
01-4280-22~
1010
~-4170-2280
2'2-4170-4110
1010
PRE-PAID CHECk,
AMO~T CHECK # DATE
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Business Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Charges to Other
Departments
Other Revenue
TOTAL REVENUE
LIQUOR FUND
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
DOCKS FUND
CEMETERY FUND
CITY OF MOUND
1989 BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
SEPTEMBER 1989 75.0%
SEPTEMBER YTD PER CENT
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED
984315 0 495866 488449 50.38%
965800 30517 537125 428675 55.61%
9410 -1376 8054 1356 85.59%
86700 9002 59019 27681 68.07%
38800 806 9898 28902 25.51%
100000 12197 60305 39695 60.31%
16500 1743 15609 891 94.60%
51850 0 1656 50194 3.19%
2253375 52889 1187532 1065843 52.70%
880000 79023 653094 226906 74.22%
330000 33115 236209 93791 71.58%
580000 47907 427209 152791 73.66%
65300 80 61781 3519 94.61%
3050 400 1400 1650 45.90%
CITY OF MOUND
1989 BUDGET REPORT
EXPENDITURES
SEPTEMBER 1989
75.0%
BUDGET
SEPTEMBER YTD
EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE
PER CENT
EXPENDED
GENERAL FUND
Council 46030 6250 60775 -14745 132.03%
Cable TV 9980 0 8717 1263 87.34%
City Manager/Clerk 143210 10766 103532 39678 72.29%
Elections 650 16 272 378 41.85%
Assessing 43930 41186 41793 2137 95.14%
Finance 152760 11091 111132 41628 72.75%
Computer 20000 1796 18316 1684 91.58%
Legal 97100 5673 46516 50584 47.91%
Police 677770 48717 491563 186207 72.53%
Civil Defense 1880 121 226 1654 12.02%
Planning/Inspections 128400 10411 84133 44267 65.52%
Recycling 67400 2245 58036 9364 86.11%
Streets 391140 25848 348474 42666 89.09%
Shop & Stores 57760 4740 48340 9420 83.69%
city Property 81860 3630 72191 9669 88.19%
Parks 149320 9093 108837 40483 72.89%
Summer Recreation 11090 0 2861 8229 25.80%
Contingencies 30000 498 10246 19754 34.15%
Transfers 126150 9859 88828 37322 70.41%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
2236430 191940 1704788 531642
76.23%
Area Fire
Service Fund
Liquor Fund
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Docks Fund
Cemetery Fund
209230 9659 138252 70978 66.08%
158810 11222 118114 40696 74.37%
322550 36284 283078 39472 87.76%
634160 62638 472085 162075 74.44%
72240 401 59894 12346 82.91%
3950 190 1841 2109 46.61%
* FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT *
pUBLIC OFFICIALS AND AGENCY PERSONNEL ARE
INVITED TO PARTICIPATE IN:
.-A PREVIEW OF THE TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT PLANS --
LAKE' MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
COMPREHENSIVE, MANAGEMENT PLAN
PLEASE RESERVE THIS DATE R£CD OCT 1
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1989
7:30 _am to 4:15 pm
Lafayette Club .
County Road 15
Minnctonka Beach
9 989
The purpose of the meeting is to provide an open discussion of the preliminary contents of the
Comprehensive Management Plan.
AGENDA
MANAGEMENT PLAN OVERVIEW
DECEMBER 2, 1989
7:30 - 8:00 am Registration - (Coffee and Rolls)
8:00 - 8:30 am Management Plan Overview
8:35 - 9:55 am
Shoreland Protection
Shoreland Management
Onshore Recreational Facilities
10:00- 11:45 am
Public Use and Safety
Lake Access
Lake Use
Public Safety
12:00 - 1:00 pm Lunch - Small Group Discussions
1:15 - 2:30 pm
Natural Environment Manage~nent Plan
Wetlands and Fisheries
Water Quality
2:35 - 4:15 pm The Next Step, Feedback and Conclusions
3'11o
Plans on each of the above subjects will be provided for your advance review in preparation for this
meeting. Your RSVP will be requested at that time. There is no charge.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
~RO MEMBERS
JoEIlen L Hurr. Chair
Ororto
Thomas Reese. Vice Chair
Mound
,Jan Boswinkel. Secretary
Uinnetonka Beach
Jo~n Lawman. Treasurer
Minne~rista
Oouglas E. Babcock
Spring Park
I~larvin Bjorltn
Tonka Bay
David Cochran
Greenwood
Albert O. Foster
Deephaven
Ja~es N. Grathwol
Excelsior
Jo~n G. Malinka
Victoria
Thomas Uartinson
Wayzata
Robert K. Pillsbury
Minnetonka
Robert Rascop
Shorewood
Robert E Slocum
Woodland
October 10, 1989
OCT 1 6 1989
Mr. Tom Reese
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
5641 Bartlett Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Thank you, Tom .
for dedicating a generous share of your time in preparing
for and delivering an updated presentation on LMCD's
Eurasian Water Milfoil Weed Control Program at the Minnesota
Lake Management Conference October 2. The exceptional
attendance of 350 conferees, with apparently standing
room only at each workshop, confirms the high interest
in lake quality issues this conference addressed.
This is also an appropriate time to recognize the excep-
tional investment of your time and talent toward the total
1989 Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, creating another
exception for LMCD with its weed harvesting program.
We all shared in the frustrations of equipment
non-availability and the eagerness to clear Lake Minnetonka
of "the weed." As it turned out, the 670 acres represent
a significant control for a first year effort. This com-
pares with a total of 195 acres harvested under permit
for all of Minnesota in 1988. We must recognize, of course,
that many acres are harvested annually since individuals
may do 2,500 sq.ft, without a permit.
You have set a new benchmark for the Board in achieving
a meaningful program for LMCD.
Your involvement with the Advisory Committee planning
and chairmanship is a further recognition of your willing-
ness to back your interest with performance. The regular
communications with your Mound City Council and commissions
completes probably the most exemplary year for a Board
member.
(more)
$"111
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Mr. Tom Reese
Oactober 10, 1989
Page 2
My personal warm appreciation goes with the Board's recog-
nition for an outstanding service to the District.
Eugene R. Strommen
Executive Director
enc: conference program
Mound Mayor Steve Smith
Mound City Council
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
OCT ! 2 1989
USE COHHITTEE
AGENDA
4:30 p.m., Monday, October 16, 1989
LMCD Office, Wayzata
Charter boats:
A. Berthing in residenti~l areas, continued from September
review
B. Stowage marking of PFD's (life preservers), per DNR
response
C. Application form review by Pillsbury, Babcock, Sgt.
Chandler
Personal Watercraft progress report and preparations for
10/25 public hearing (minutes of 9/19 meeting previously
mailed)
3. Citizen Brodie letter regarding silt in Arcola Channel,
and Hennepin County response (letters attached)
4. Winter Rules:'review deicing item, now out-of-date
5. Water Patrol report
6. Additional business recommended by the committee
10-10-89
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
EI 'O OCT t 0 1989
Date: 10-6-89
Gene Strommen
Executive Director
L.M.C.D.
473-7033
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Notice is given that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District will hold a public hearing in the matter
of investigating the need for regulating personal
watercraft on Lake Minnetonka. The hearing will be
held at the Minnetonka Community Center, 14600 Minnetonka
Blvd., City of Minnetonka at 7 p.m. on Wednesday,
October 25, 1989.
Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
WATER STRUCll/Ig$ & EI IKON IgNT OMMITTgI
AGENDA
7:30 a.m., Saturday, October 14, 1989
LMCD Office, Wayzata
OCT 1 0 989
Preliminary review, Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Minnetonka Boat
Works, Orono, New Dock License and Special Density applications
Moratorium consideration for outlot development on Lake Minnetonka for
purposes of providing Lake access and dockage for non-riparian properties
David Thomas residential development, Smithtown Bay, South Upper Lake,
City of Victoria, requesting a five slip outlot dock and three residential
docks on three parcels, totaling 385' shoreline, with appropriate easements
and homeowners association to govern
Gayle's Marina dredging operation and commercial use of property in viola-
tion of City of Orono B-2 zoning, communication from the City of Orono
Shoreland Management rules facilitation among 14 member cities to develop
uniform Lake Minnetonka Shoreland Regulations
Wayzata yacht Club progress on considerations relating to City of Wayzata's
concern on the Yacht Club's annual license renewal
7. Additional business recommended by the committee
ENVIRONMENT:
1. Preliminary report on weed harvesting program completed 9/29/89
2. Review of contract to engage maintenance service for weed harvesting equip-
ment end-of-season storage
3. Preliminary forecast for 1990 weed harvesting program--the options being
examined
4. Rob Merila performance report
5. Additional business recommended by the committee
10-6-89
Action Report:
LAKE MINNETON KApERSON~ WATERC~CONSERVATIONSTUDYDISTRICT ~f~ O~' ~/0 ]~1~
MINUTES
Meeting of Tuesday, 9/19/89, ?:00 pm, Prudential-Bache, Wayzata
Present:
INTRODUCTION.
Committee Chair Bert Foster, Deephaven; Lake Use Chair Bob'
Pillsbury, LMCD Chair JoEllen Hurt; Water Structures Chair
Dave Cochran, Water Patrol Sgt. Bill Chandler, Executive Dir.
Gene Strommen; Guests Claude Beumer, Yamaha Motor Corp;
John Greenberg, Kawasaki Motor Corp; Kris Webb, Wet Jet
and Personal Watercraft Industry Assn; Anita Twaroski, MN DNR,
John Nord, Anoka-Ramsey Sport Ct; Mike Dapper, Water Scooter
Magazine; Charlie Jones, Minnetonka Boat Rental; Deb & Steve
Wagner, Minnetonka Jet Ski; Dennie Cathers, Minnetonka Jet Ski;
Dennis Keating, Minnetonka Boat Works;i Doug Babcock, LMCD Board,
, Spring Park;
Chair Foster welcomed the industry representatives who had been provided advance
LMCD material introducing an outline dealing with (A) The Problem; (B) Analysis
of ~tlternative Solutions which inclUded:eight sub-topics. Foster reviewed the
oUtline inviting comment from the guests and Board members in attendance.
~gt. Chandler, Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol, reported the 1989 summer
experience with personal watercraft (PWC) as involving one near fatality and two
property damage accidents. Fifteen formal complaints were registered dealing
primarilly with noice and carelessoperation~
Industry representatives basically cited a small minority of operators creating
the majority of problems. While buyers are in the 35 year and older age range,
users -- likely children of the buyers -- tend to be much younger, in the 15
and up range.
It was agreed a need for education as to proper use, proper operation in quiet
waters is constant. Dealers take particular effort to introduce equipment
and its proper use to buyers through literature and actual video tapes. Safety,
courtesy of operation and respecting the rights of others are stressed. This
is true in the case of rentals, members presented stated. It is also expected
that users receiving equipment from owners do not get the same message, and
thus the deviation from the advance information is lost down the line of users.
Chandler further noted ~hat tickets are issued to a high percentage of persons
renting PWC. This likely can be attributed in part to lack of rules familiarity
as a result of not taking time to know and understand them. The greater
responsibility on businesses renting units taken to inform renters will assist
in reducing this category of violation.
ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS.
it was the group's concensus that items 1 and 2 are not reasonable options.
Doing something about noise level is definitely a priority. Discussion included:
* Manufacturers are meeting required 82 dba noise level ratings, and are
concerned about after-market modification kits which exceed these limits.
Kawasak~ has lowered its parts prices to discourage after-market use items.
LMCD, Personal Water Craft Study, Minutes, 9/19/89, P. 2
* In response to a question on comparable noise levels, it was noted
every 3 decibels doubles sound output. =
* Placement of exhaust below the water line in current and future PWC
models will resolve much of the noise problem.
* The water box, which receives modification and increases dba levels~
could be made to avoid modification.
* If dba is lowered for PWC's, it was recommended this apply to all
watercraft.
LICENSING & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
DNR requires an operators permit for all youth 13-17 years, which
includes thorough safety training.
* A PWC endorsement on the instruction and permit program was suggested.
Move the noise away from~the shore, by requiring PWC's to stay a suggested 1,000'
away from shore, was concluded as too great a distance. Personal Watercraft
Industry Assn. (PWIA) representative Kris Webb voiced objection to that distance.
* Leaving the shorezone by the shortest route was thought to be reasonable.
* Separate rules for PWC's vs. power boats was a matter of concern as to
speeds in certain restricted areas. It was preferred the same rules
apply to all watercraft. Leaving no-wake areas such as channels was noted.
*A separate set of "boating basics" for personal watercraft was thought
to be acceptable.
*Testing at a variety of distances from shore was recommended to arrive
at a reasonable distance for PWC's to maintain away from shore.
Water Patrol enforcement and impoundment. '
* Boating laws are already in place for impoundment when necessary. An
offense must be very serious before impoundment is applied, such as a
BWI with no other operator to return watercraft to home port.
Passing rule at 150'.
* Such a rule would appear to be applicable to all watercraft, and
it further adds the enforcement difficulty.
* Watercraft cutting in front of another is already a rule violation.
Again enforcement is the challenge for prevention.
* PWC's moving through areas in which swimmers are present is also a
violation. Some non-designated swimming areas, such as the north
side of Big Island, experience PWC's moving through swimmers. Correction
in these areas may require formal designation of such areas. Traffic
among swimmers in any circumstance merits controls.
CONCLUSIONS.
Ail participants of this meeting were invited to take part in the decibel test,
10:00 am, Fri., Sep. 29 at Spring Park, Sheriff's Water Patrol Station, was
confirmed. Sgt. Bill Chandler will arrange testing equipment, buoy placement.
Stock models and modified examples will be tested. Results will be summarized
at the Water Patrol's direction and distributed. Foster complimented all in
attendance, thanking them for their constructive input.
Executive Director
RECEIVEO
SEP 29 1989
L.M.C-D.
tal(e effect this weekend
.;
By I~lpise Hedbor :
Free; .Pre, Ss Correspondent
Vermont's sweeping package
of b~)~ting laws, backed by more
monby and new enforcement offi-
cers~,went into effect Saturday
just i0 time for one of the biggest
boafin, g :weekends of the year·
IJ~ Michael Vinton, head of the
Stat~-Police Marine Division, said
three'to four boats will' be work-
ing ~10uble shifts on Lake Cham-
plaid-through the holiday period,
and .ll~ other boats will be patrol-
ling .olher waters in the state·
'Pie iofficers' emphasis will be
on e~l.uc'ation, "telling people what
the kew law is all about, not
wnt[ng.tmkets, Vinton said.
Sg't. '.James Markiewicz, public
inforrhation officer, said one of
the filajor changes is the require-
men['-that boatS operate so as not
to cr~hte a wake and, in any case,
no f~ster than 5 mph whenever
they'.'..are within 200 feet of a
shoreline, an anchor~ge~ ~ person
in the'Water, or boats docked or at
moo/'i.n~s~
NO bne u..n_.d_e.r. !.§_ .may op.e..r.a_t_e
a_p.e]r~6n~l ~ Craft, and all ehil-
~tr~n~"~l~'~'"I'~'-~fid-ti'h~er must wear
a CoaSt Guard approved personal
flota2tion device-anytime a boat is
mov!fil~, said Sgt. Bill Merritt, who
heads~the state police marine divi-
sion t9~' the Burlington area.
l~j~essively .noisy boat engines,
generally "high perfOrmanee
boatS;that exhaust above the wa-
.t.
terhn~? are no~.w._Lll.eg~.l, and po-
lice ~-boats will · be carrying
equipfi~ent to measure whether
boats;meet the new maximum-al-
lowekl'noise level of 82 decibels at
50 feidi, Merritt said.
Other new laws say:
· ~No one'under'the age of 12
may'~)perate a~b°at Pbwered-[J~
mor~. :*, than a six-horsepo~we~r., en-
gine..i~
· ;All vessels, extent sail-
boards, must carry at l~ast one
personal flotation device for each
person aboard, with no exception
for small boats used at summer
camps.
· Anyone under 16 must wear
a floation device when using a
sailboard:
· All operators and passengers
of personal ski craft, co-mgnonly
called jet skis, ~_ust wear flota-
tion devices. Jet skis may °--n..iy"b/~
operated during d__ay_light hour_.__s..
· A w_a_ter ski obse_r_yver must be
at least 12 ye.ar__s_91_d.
Despite their stated emphasis
on education, officers say they
will be strictly enforcing a new
law against boating while intoxi-
cated. It provides that no one
under the influence of liquor or
drugs may operate a vessel, and
sus~)ected violators are required
to submit to blood or breath test-
ing.
Violators face loss of the right
to operate a boat for a year, plus
a fine of $200 to $750 for...first
offense, and $250 to $1,000 .for
second offense. Similar penalties
may be assessed for anyone who
refuses to take a test. In addition,
the owner or person responsible
for a boat may not permit its
operation by an intoxicated per-
son.
Merritt said a booklet outlining
all of the provisiOn-'fi-~-Vermont's
revised marine laws was printed
last week fi~-lS-hbw being distrib-
uted to marinas, state police bar-
racks and other locations around
the state. Questions about the new
laws can be answered at local
state police barracks, said Mer-
ritt.
Vinton said state police and
auxiliaries are scheduled to put in
a total of 12,500 hours on patrols
this boating season, with about
half that time allocated to Lake
Champlain.
Proposed county' jet 'ski:. rUles.i
coul. d./divert': th m.,, to,!.:sanibel.
"'" ' ': " ' ,~' :: ...... .:, ;,; banning th~ Jet ~kl;:;ntirely' from
County,s law would bnly .' ~t '.';.}:~: county-controlled bay'waters
cover unincorporated areas significantly limiting their use
along the gulf beaches. ' ......
By Ron Sympson In addition to Jeopardizing the
The Island of Sanlbel could ' ... :i lives oi~ swimmers and boaters, be~
become a sanctuary for Jet skiers if ..;)..~ said, jet/skis often are"destructive
strict new controls are aPProved: ".'~.,,r~. and dangerous': to [ishl birds and ~. ,'.
that would restrict or ban use of.the!.u Es other wildlife..,' ',
personal watercraft along the Lee ,~;. i;; ..... Judah said thesentiment against
County gulf coast. .~ " ' : . ~'~' jet skl~ is widespread along the' ·
The controls are being considered ? ,. Southwest Florida coast and that
as an amendment to the county's..: ', 4~(~ ~imllat regulation,i are being '
water safety ordinance, in response '.' ,:~'. ·
7-~-,' considered in Manatee, Charlotte
?tO hundreds of complaints about jet .. %. ~' and Lee counties.: ' ! ' '
skis from citizens of every barrier . .,:, ~. According to Bates, every i .., .....
island in Lee Coun. ty from Boca community in Lee County has-'-. '
Grande to Bohita Beach. ' expressed concern about the jet skis,
,As the only InCorporated area on
the gulf~ San'ibel would be exempt
from the regulations, a situation
that could compel the city to follow
· suit with its own new law.
: "We may be forced into talcing .:
some kind of action," sai.d Sanibel
City Manager Gary Price.
The proposed new law would'
limit the launching or use of jet skis
within 300 feet of the gulf beach to
areas "designated exclusively for .
' .and that environmental arguments-'-~
"~re becoming as Important as the ' '
personal safety issue in the debate.
:' "Pretty soon, it has to have a ? '
detrimental effect on marine life,~"
Bates said. "Some are saying you
~ can kiss the.sport fishing Industry.-
good-bye.'' ' ' ·
q '" ln.Sanibel, jet skiers are legally:..,..
..'.'~ limited to launching their ," .:
watercraft from the city's three
'* ' ~ublic boat ramps -.at the Sanibel .,.:
personal.watercraft use." So far, no ~. Marina, Tarpon Bay, and the '.
approved areas for jet ski use have '" causeway. .... :!
been designated in the amendment, : · ~ ' City Manager Price
Which limits use of the watercraft ' acknowledged, however, that a law.
from 8 a.m. to one [~our before sunset.. · prohibillng vehicles from driving ';.
In Capliva, the ordinance may . - ' onto a beach to launch jet skis often
prohibit jet ski use altogether, if the..., is Ignored. And there are no controls '
Captlva Civic Asspciatioa has its on Jet skis in Sanibel's bays, passes
way. : and channels. ' .~'i ;. ' '.' ' '.
'Their position is (that jet skis}..',, .~ Price said Sanibel's exemption
si~ould be banned from public ,., 'from the ordinance as an
waters," said assoclatio, n president
John Bales. "we have had
complaints about every operation on '.
every part of the island."
County Commissioner Ray Judah.
said he strongly favor~ the .
ordinance amendment. ..
'incorporated area could result in jet.
skiers from all over.Lee County
coming to the island to escape
restrictions.
.... We might be forced, depending
on the numbers, to place controls," '
Price said.
"We need to have a belier control "He likened Ihe jet ski issue to the
of the je.t ski situation,"; he said. -', v leash law. When Ihe county passed
In Judah's opinion, that means "~: an ordinance compelling people to '
.-~ ~,~ r .--~?~,,:~v,I..~L_.,~--~-~-- '. walk their dog~'bn leashes, Price ~'
~~-,."-'"=~'~'"---:' said, pet owners from throughout"
~4.~~~ Ihe county came to Sanibel. The '
f~!~.~:~~~ islands pet popularity led to the
~~~ ~'.~:~,~.,~,~.~ city's'passage of its own leash law:
~~~ ~~ The proposed ~:ounty ordinance
[.~.~.,.~~~lJ~ was drafted by the Lee County
^,,orney', O,,Ice ,or ,be coun,y',
[~ "~age,2a~-..'~-~-~"--~.--~ service delivery committee. ·'
Comments o. the o dl.a.ce, , d.e
~~~. ,' The ~ County Commission will
pro,ssi. - '
Jet skier off Sanibel Causeway
Sun 1
Sat 7
Sat 14
Sat 21
Sat 28
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
473-7033
EVENTS SCHEDULE
October 1989
Don Shelby US Invitational
Bass Tournament W/MTKA Boat Works
Boating Season
Yacht club races: Lower Lake
7:00 am
10:00 am
10:00 am
10:00 am
10:00 am
10-4-89
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
I~OUNO ADVI~RY PLANNING COHNISSION
October 9, 1989
Present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners GeofF Michael. Ken
Smith, Frank Weiland, William Thai, and Jerry Clapsaddle, Council
Representative Liz Jensen, Building OFFicial Jan Bertrand, City
Manager Ed Shukle, City Planner Mark Ko,gl,r, City Engineer John
Cameron, and Secretary Peggy James.
The Following citizens were also present: Jack Ostvig, Gunnel
Ostvig, Bruce McComb, Marcella Lemmon, and Scot McKenzie.
Chair Bill Meyer called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES:
MOTION made by Smith seconded by Ciapsadclle to approve
the Planning Commission Minutes of Septefl~er 25, 1989 as
submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
BOARD ~ APPEALS:
Case No. 89-844: Scot McKenzie, 486I Hanover Road~ Lots 6
and 15~ Block 16, Devon~.. PID #25-I17-24-11 0061 & 0065.
FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE.
Building OFFicial, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicant's request
For a Fence height variance. She explained that when she con-
ducted her Final inspection on the Fence, she Found some areas to
be as high as 92 to 101 inches From the adjoining grade, and in
addition, the fence was placed on top oF a small retaining wall.
The Building OFFicial explained that a 72 inch high Fence is the
allowable height in the subject location, however when a Fence is
placed on top oF retaining wall, the maximum height is 42 inches.
Bertrand also informed the Commission that the applicant wanted
the Fence due to the appearance oF the neighbors yard. She in-
Formed the Commission that a clean-up notice will be sent his
neighbor this week.
StaFf recommended, that since the topography oF the lot does make
it diFFicult to comply with the six foot height, that the Plan-
ning Commission could allow some variation to the retaining wall
Fence height oF 42 inches, therefore, reducing the required
height somewhere below the current height oF 101 inches.
The applicant, Scot McKenzie, spoke on his behalF. He stated
that the retaining wall was not their when the Fence was erected;
the retaining wall was added after the Fence was erected due to
soil erosion problems. He also emphasized the need For a high
Fence due to the appearance oF his neighbors yard.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 9, 1989
Page Two
The Commission discussed the structural issues of the fence due
to topography. Some Commissioners determined that )t is possible
to construct a Fence running with the grade, however it would
have to be a custom built Fence.
MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Michael to deny the
Fence height variance due to lack of hardship. In addi-
tion, the Fence ts to be brought into conformance. Mo-
tion carried 5 to 2. (Those in Favor: Weiland, Thai,
Jensen, Smith, and Michael; those opposed: Meyer and
Clapsaddle.)
Clapsaddle stated that he does not Find the fence, offensive as it
exists.
The applicant, Mr. McKenzte, stated that he does not agree with
the Fence ordinance, and Feels Fences should be allowed to be 8
Feet high.
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 24, 1989.
be
Case No. 89-845: Bruce McComb~ Present Location 3005 Brig~
ton Blvd.~ Proposed Location 4723 Cumberland Road~ North
lOl' of Lot 38 & the W 1~2 of Lot 39~ Block lot Pembroke,
PID #1~-!17-23-033 0195. HOUSE MOVING.
Building OFficial, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicant's request
to move a house From 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road.
The applicant is also requesting approval to reside in the house
to be moved at its present location until he can build a new home
on the same property. When his new home is complete, he will
then move the house to the Cumberland address. Bertrand sug-
gested establishing and escrow account to allow the City Attorney
to record a document on the property with bonding to assure
removal of the present structure after occupancy of the new.
Bertrand reviewed the current statistics of the subject house,
and the required improvements. The effective age of the struc-
ture is 1942 with a current square footage of 770.
Applicant, Bruce McComb, displayed to the Commission a front and
side elevation drawing of the proposed improved structure as it
would be on the new lot. He also displayed photographs of all
the existing houses on that block of Cumberland. Bruce pointed
out that all but two of the homes on that block of Cumberland
have tuckunder garages, the same as he is proposing to do.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 9, 1989
Page Three
McComb requested that he be allowed to turn the dormer back into
an attic, since it would be too difficult to bring it to code to
use as a dormer due to the ceiling height and proper doorways.
In addition, he requested that the existing base-board heat be
allowed to rem~in, he feels it is adequate. He explained that he
is creating a marketable starter home. He stated that he has
received bids from two moving companies, and each said that the
house would be easy to move because it is structurally sound and
it is small. He added that he considered adding onto the house
at its present location, however, it currently sits 10 feet From
the road, therefore will always be a nonconforming structure and
would only cause problems.
Clapsaddle noted that the applicant did not have a site plan for
the new location on Cumberland, he commented that he would like
the house to be placed on the lot to allow room for future expan-
sion in order to alleviate a hardship For the Future owners.
Jensen commented that she needed more information, such as the
value of the surrounding homes, and the square footage of the
homes. McComb stated that his house would have approximately
1,200 square feet of usable floor area when it is finished.
MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Clapsaddle, to ap-
prove the house moving From 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723
Cu~erland R~ per staff recommenclation, excluding the
recommendation to re-configure the warm air ducts to the
outside walls and the return att ducts to the Inside
walls. In addition, a bond at 125[ of the proposed
Finished value of the house must be obtained tn favor of
the City of Mound to ensure c~letlon of the proJect.
The house ts to be moved and c~leted to c~e by 12-31-
90. The house is to be constructed with a tuckunder
garage as per the plans submitted by the applicant
(Exhibits A & B). Motion carried 6 to !. (Those in
Favor: Clapsaddle, Weiland, Thai, Meyer, 5mtth, and
Michael; those opposed: Jensen.)
McComb stated that he is in agreement with the motion.
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 24, 1989.
Planning Commission Minutes
October
Page Four
DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONAL~
Discussion: Open Storage of Public Works Materials (Public Hear-
lng is being set For October 23rd)~
The City Planner and Council Representative Jensen reviewed the
history of this issue. Koegler Further reviewed questions which
the Planning Commission needs to address, they are:
Is open storage of public works materials appropriate on
lands lying adjacent to the existing and expanded City Hall?
IF not, does the Planning Commission have suggestions on an
alternative location?
IF the Planning Commission Finds that storage is appropriate
on the proposed site, what modification to the zoning or-
dinance should be enacted to allow the storage to occur?
The Commission discussed possible storage at the east and west
sides of City Hall. The City Engineer informed the Commission of
the amount of storage needed, and the amount of storage space
that can be provided at City Hall. He concluded that even with
storage on both sides of City Hall, storage space will still be
needed for seal coat, solid sand, and snow. The cost to create
storage space at City Hal1 compared to the cost to keep the
materials at the Lost Lake site was reviewed. The Commission
determined that their were three lmpracticalitles to having
storage sites at City Hall: 1) cost of the project, 2) having
piles around a "new/Improved" City Hall would not be appealing,
and 3) the number of trees that would be cut down.
The Commission discussed the advantages and disadvantages of
having the material stored at the Lost Lake site. The Commission
reached a consensus that the City Hall site is not an appealing
option, and that the Lost Lake site should be further examined.
A public hearing will be held pertaining to this Issue at the
next Planning Commission meeting on October 23, I989.
City Council Representative Report
Jensen reviewed the City Council Meeting of September 25, I989
and the Committee of the Whole Meeting.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 9, 1989
Page Five
Housing Maintenance/Truth in Housinq
Michael handed out copies of an article relating to cities
licensing apartment houses. The article was reviewed and dis-
cussed by the the Commission.
Michael also handed out a drafted memorandum requesting the City
Council to direct staFF to work with the Planning Commission to
draft a Housing Maintenance/Truth in Housing Ordinance. Some
revisions were suggested; and a revised copy will be reviewed at
the next Planning Commission meeting on October 23rd.
MOTION made by Clapsaddle, Seconded by Thai to adjourn
the meeting at 10:46 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION
OCTOBER 12, 1989
Present were: Chair Martlyn Byrnes, Commissioners Cathy Bally,
Nell Weber, Shirley Andersen, Nancy Clough and Brian Asleson;
Council Representative Phyllis Jessen; Park Director Jim Fackler;
City Manager, Ed Shukle, Dock Inspector, Dell Rudolph, and
Secretary Peggy James.
Absent and excused were:
Burke.
Commissioners Tom Casey, and Steve
The following citizens were also In attendance: Duane Barth,
Todd Gray, Paul Gl ym, Robin Schlel, John Shackleford, Bryan Clem,
Janet Johnson, Brian Johnson, Jim Kinney, Theo Kinney, Kathy Kin-
ney, Nancy & Bill Blume, Carolyn & Cliff Schmtdt, Ron Johnson,
Kay & Jim Ostman, and David C. Lavada.
Chair Byrnes called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
Minutes
The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of September 14, 1989
were presented for changes and/or additions.
MOTION made by Asleson, seconded by Bailey, to approve
the Park Commission Minutes of September 14, 1989 as
written. Motion carried un~nimously.
Recreation Chapter - Comprehensive Plan.
City Planner, Mark Koegler, asked the Commission If they had any
changes or additions to the Comprehensive Plan. Jessen noted a
few changes/additions to the listed equipment and status of some
parks. 5he corrected the spelling of "Crescent" Park. Jessen
also requested that it be mentfoned that lake accesses have stg-
nage, and all lake accesses, including fire lanes, be listed as
access points.
Koegler informed the Commission that the entire draft of the Com-
prehensive Plan will be submitted for review at the November Park
Commission meeting.
Per City Council direction: consider relocation of commons docks
at Avalon Park.
The Park Director reviewed the history of having City docks lo-
cated at Avalon Park, as it is outlined in the City Council
Minutes of May 4, 1982. He reviewed the current status of the
dockage at Avalon Park) there are five docks, four of which are
being shared, therefore there Is a total of nine people that
Park Commission Minutes
October 12, 1989
Page Two
would have to be relocated. These dock holders are non-abutting
residents which makes it very difficult to relocate these clocks
since there is no vacant City owned shoreiine For non-abutting
res i dents on the "l s I and". Fackl er referred to the dock locat t on
The Following citizens spoke in Favor of having the City docks
remain at Avalon Park: Brian Johnson of 4445 Manchester Road,
Bryan Clem of 4436 Manchester, Kathy Kinney of 3011 Island View
Drive, Ron Johnson of 4416 Dorchester Road, and Cliff Schmidt of
3001 Island View Drive.
There were no citizens present to speak in opposition of having
the docks remain at Avalon Park.
The Commission discussed the need For the docks to remain at
Avalon Park. They questioned why this issue was raised, and why
these docks would present a problem, it was noted that Council-
member Johnson raised the Issue, however a reason was not given.
MOTION made by Weber to Inform the City Council that the
Park Commission did reconsider relocating the City docks
at Avalon Park and the recommendation is to have the
docks remain as is. Clough seconded the motion with an
amendment: Counclimember Johnson should appear before
the Park Commission IF he has an issue with this item.
Weber accepted the amendment. Motion carried unanim-
ously.
This item will appear before the City Council on October 24,
1989.
Maintenance Permit: 2920 Highland Court, Creative Developers
(Duane Barth), request to construct stairway and deck down to the
lake within a Scenic Easement.
The Park Director explained to the Commission that the Building
Inspector requested that the Park Commission review this par-
ticular request. The Building Inspector issued a building permit
to Creative Developers to construct a stairway and deck to the
lake. When she visited the site For an inspection, a "Stop Work
Order" was posted due to the size of the deck being constructed.
Fackler explained that the Scenic Easement limits construction
within the designated easement to allow only a 48" wide stairway.
The Scenic Easement was a condition of subdivision approval to
protect the environment.
Park Commission Minutes
October 12, 1989
Page Three
Duane Barth of Creative Developers, compared his stairway with
the neighbors "elaborate" stairway. Barth stated that the neigh-
bor received City Council approval to construct his stairway.
Fackler explained that during the heavy rain fall of 1987, the
hill eroded and washed away all the vegetation at the neighboring
property, therefore, the City Council approved construction
within their Scenic Easement to help prevent further erosion.
The Commission questioned staff why this issue was submitted to
them For review. The Commission agreed that this is a planning
Issue, especially since they did not originally review the sub-
division or Scenic Easement.
MOTION ~ade by Weber, seconded by Andersen, to refer
this request to the Planning Commission for their review
at their meeting on October 23, 1989, then refer to the
City Council on October 24, 1989. Motion carried unani-
mously.
Request from Nancy Blume to use City property For a public
gatherin~ with a bon-Fire.
Fackler referred to a letter dated October lO, 1989 From Nancy
Blume requesting to use commons property next to her house For a
get together. Bill and Nancy Blume were present, and explained
that they wanted the bon-Fire to be on the beach, not on commons
property. The City Manager Informed them to contact Don Bryce,
Fire Chief, to obtain a burning permit. He also informed them
that they need to obtain a permit for a public gathering,
however, he will not approve this until the burning permit is ap-
proved.
Revised 1990 Dock Permit Application.
The revised application was reviewed, and accepted.
Discussion: Depot rental Fees.
This item was tabled From the September 14th Park Commission
meeting because Jessen was not present at that meettng. Jessen
stated that the depot needs to be Improved and brought up to code
if it is going to be rented. The Co~misslon discussed Funding
options, Future needs, and possible uses For the depot, consider-
ing its location and lack of parking.
The City Manager informed the Commission that three years ago a
plan was drafted for Improving the depot and Mound Bay Park.
Estimated costs for these improvements were also Included in the
Park Commission Minutes
October 12, 1989
Page Four
plan. The Ctty Manager statecl that the Park Oirector coulcl
review the plans and get an estim~ted cost for necessary improve-
ments and they cpu Icl poss i b 1 y be accomp'l i shed i n stages, i n ad-
dition, he offered suggestions for donations, such as the Lions,
Rotary, and Jaycee's. The Commission commented that the Histori-
cal Society should be informed anO included in any discussions
pertaining to the depot.
~xpiration of Terms as of i2-30-89: Marilyn .~,yrnes and Nancy
Clou. g~ need to Inform the staff if them wish to be reappo
Commissioner Clough announed that she is not seeking to be reap-
pointed, and that this will be the last meeting she will attend.
She explalneO that she forsees too many schedule conflicts,
however, has valued her contributions to the Commission and took
pride in her service.
Chair Byrnes expressed that she wishes to be reappointed.
The City Manager informed the Commission that the City Council is
working on establishing a policy for the expiration and appoint-
ment of terms. A Commission member who wishes to be reappointed
will be interviewed by both the Commission and City Council,
along with the other a~Plicants. He added that the Council is
considering removing the requirement that a Commissioner cannot
serve more than two consecutive three year terms.
C_o..uncl_l Representative's Report
Jessen informed the Commission of the City Council's decision on
the request to ban the use of herOicides on City Property
City Manager's Re o~__9_~
The City Manager reviewed the status of the proposed City Hall
improvements, along with the Pub] ic Works materials storage
issue. In addition, he explained the a new tax law adopteO by
the State Legislature and how it affects cities.
park OJ~.~ctor's Re~__~
Fackler explained that posts have been installed at Chester Park,
5' on-center. Weber questioned the spacing of the posts. He
stated that he was under the impression they were trying to
prevent snowmobilers in the Park. It was determined Weber could
arrange another meeting with the Chester Park Study group to dis-
cuss the improvements which have been made to the park.
Park Commission Minutes
October 12, i989
Page Five
Fackler reviewed the locations which are to be riprapped during
the coming winter. Jessen and Bailey commented that they had
received complaints about the riprip, and that it was hard to
walk across.
MOTION Nde by Weber, seconded by Clough to adjourn the
meeting at 9~57 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
as- ociat[.on ot:
metro itan
munic °al'itie
BULLETIN
OCT 1 8 tq8.q
October 17, 1989
AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY ADOPTION MEETING
SPOUSES, FRIENDS AND GUESTS ARE MOST WELCOME
WHEN: Thursday Evening, November 2, 1989
KICK OFF: 5:45 P.M.
WHERE:
Minneapolis Metrodome Hilton
1330 Industrial Blvd.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
*DINNER COST: $20.00 Per Person
5:45 P.M.
6:30 P.M.
7:30 P.M.
Cash Bar/Social Hour
Deluxe Buffet Feast
(featuring steamship round
of beef, roast turkey and
dressing, five salads,
dessert and more)
Business Meeting
(Tax Policy concerns
and AMM Policy
Adoption)
*DINNER RESERVATIONS TO CAROL WILLIAMS AT 227-4008 A MUST BY NOON ON
MONDAY, OCTOBER 30, 1989.
(Reservations not needed if you only plan to attend the business meeting
portion of the event).
TO HELP PROVIDE A MORE ACCURATE COUNT, PLEASE CHANNEL YOUR DINNER
RESERVATIONS THROUGH YOUR CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATOR OFFICE. THANKS!
Representative Dee Long, House Majority Leader and Tax Committee Chair, is
expected to discuss property tax policy issues.
DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This Bulletin has been mailed individually to member
Mayors, Managers/Administrators, and Councilmembers.
SEE MAP AND AGENDA ON BACK
1
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
$,,/$/
BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA
1. Call to order.
2. Introduction of Guests, Notables and Announcements.
3. Guest Speaker: Rep. Dee Long.
&. Consideration and adoption of Legislative Policies (mailed ..
previously) and priority setting input.
5. Preliminary report from AMMMission and Membership Services Task
Force - Kevin Frazell, Cottage Grove Administrator.
6. Staffing needs for 1990 Legislative Session and Beyond - Board
Recommendation (Impending Outstate vs. Metro Property Tax
Conflicts).
7. Adjournment.
(NOT DRAWN TO SCALE)
Broadw~
Hil
Inn
stoplight
E
Hennepin
Larpenteur
{-94
S
CHANGES TO PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE POLICIES
-Below are changes made by the Board of Directors at its October 12,
1989 meeting to the proposed addendum to Policies and Legislative
Proposals for 1990 which have been previously mailed.
-As you know this addendum is an update to the current legislative
policy for the 1989-1990 Biennium. Except for changes made by the
membership at the November 2 meeting, all current policy will remain
in force.
-Also, attached is a tear off sheet to indicate your choice for top
priority legislative issues that the AMM should concentrate on for the
1990 session. Listed are the six issues chosen by the membership for
1989 with an indication of expected 1990 activity.
Policy 90-26 Comparable Worth - Page 6, fifth paragraph. The last two
sentences are changed to read;
ARBITRATION AND NEGOTIATORS SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO USE COMPARABLE WORTH RESULTS
AS THE BASIS FOR DECISIONS FOR ALL EMPLOYEE GROUPS. WHEN IMPLEMENTING
COMPARABLE WORTH PLANS FOR NON ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES, CITIES SHOULD BE ALLOWED
TO DISREGARD THE IMPACT OF ARBITRATORS AWARDS WHICH ARE NOT BASED ON
COMPARABLE WORTH STUDIES.
Policy 90-43-1 Integrated Waste Stream Planning, Page 19. Add a paragraph
after the fourth paragraph to read:
+LEGISLATION SHOULD BE INITIATED TO REGULATE THE SALE, DISTRIBUTION, AND
DISPOSAL OF NON RECYCLABLE, NON RETURNABLE, AND NON DEGRADABLE PACKAGING
MATERIALS.
Policy 90-43-2. Hazardous Waste Management page 19 and 20. Change the title
to 'Hazardous and Dangerous Waste Management' and add a paragraph (C) to read:
(C) DANGEROUS AND OTHER WASTES WHICH POSE AN ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEM
Re: Scrapping of automibiles, with air conditioning systems,
refrigerators, home air conditioners and building insulation containing
Ozone-Depleting Compounds.
Chlorofluorcarbons (CFC's) and Halons when discharged into the
environment deplete the earth's protective ozone layer, allowing
increased ultra-violet radiation causing such harms as skin cancer,
cataracts, supressions of the immune systems and damage to crops and
aquatic life. CFC's in a form commonly known as Freon are widely used in
airconditioning and refrigeration systems. Fire extinguishers are the
primary source of Halons released into the earth's atmosphere. CFC's are
a propellent used in the manufacture of foam board insulation. CFC's are
a solvent in the manufacture of electronic equipment.
The recapturing and recycling of freon from auto air conditioning units
could eliminate approximately 20% of all CFC's nationally.
AMM STRONGLY SUPPORTS LEGISLATION THAT REQUIRES RESPONSIBLE DISPOSAL OF
CFC'S (FREON) AND HALONS. THE AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION SERVICE
OPERATORS AND THE WASTE MANAGEMENT/DISPOSAL INDUSTRY MUST RECAPTURE AND
RECYCLE WASTE PRODUCTS. ELIMINATING CFC'S (FREON) AND HALON FROM THE
WASTE STREAM SHOULD BE THE GOAL.
Policy 90-52 CSAH Designation, page 25, last line, Substitute the word
"ALTERNATIVES" for 'STANDARDS'
POLICY AND ISSUE PRIORITIES
1989 Priority Issues.
Property Tax Relief/Reform. Much was accomplished in the 1989 special
session bill. However, it is anticipated that significant effort will be
made to modify LGA to Tax Base Equalization which would have a similar
effect as a statewide fiscal disparities. The consequence of this could
be a significant reduction in tax base for metro cities including those
metro cities which are currently large gainers under the metro fiscal
disparities law.
Land Use Planning. The AMM has negotiated on much of the negative
elements with other interested groups. The bill will be heard in 1990
and still contains undersireable elements (Action Level - High).
Comparable Worth. AMM, LMC, the counties, and individual cities were
successful in delaying significant changes to pay equity. This will be
an issue in 1990. (Action Level - High).
Tax Increment Financing. Some modest changes were made to TIF in the
1989 special session tax bill. Originally it was thought that 1990 might
be cooling off period. (Action Level - Uncertain).
Levy Limits and Truth in Taxation. These two issues are settled
legislatively for both 1990 and 1991 and possibly beyond. (Action Level
for 1990 - Non Expected).
MVET. The 1989 Transportation bills set the transfer level for two years
and established a long term study for the 1991 session (Action Level for
1990 - None Expected).
Please indicate below your choice for issues that you believe should be
earmarked for highest priority activity concentration by AMM. Choices may
include all or none of the above, any new proposed policy issue or any
existing current issues from the 1989-1990 Legislative Policy set.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Top Policy Priorities
Elected Official
Appointed Official
(city) optional
5
8:00 a.m.
9:00-9:45 a.m.
9:4S.10:15 a.m.
10:15.10:30 a.m.
10:30.11:45 n.m.
* Invited to spenk
League of Minnesota Cities
Policy Adoption Meeting
Thursday, November 16, 1989
RegistFation
Hotel $ofitel, Minneapolis
12:00-1:45 p.m.
EnviFonmental issues
Commisskme~ GemM Wi]Jet, Pollution Comrol
Atency
MAe gobeflsou. Direct'. Off-)ce of Waste
Management
2:00-4:30 p.m.
Open meeting law
Mark Anf'mson. Counsel, Minnesota Newspaper
Association *
Break
Property tax issues
Due to ihe uncerlalnty in Ihe properly tax area, lhe
L~ajue is unable to provide I~-mative speakefl fo~ Ihe
in~x. rty tax issues session. Our goal is to have Ihe
d~airs tribe House and Sena~ Tax Conunil~.
Lunch -- Transportation issues
Comm~ioner Lm Levine, Department of
Transpo~atkm *
Adoption of LMC legislative policies
Opening remarks - LMC President Millie Macl~od,
Counc~member, Moorhe~l
Adoption of rules governing lhe policy adoption
Consideration of proposed legislative poticies and
!. Development mlegiea
2. Elections and ethics
3. C, enernl lejishtion and personnel
4, land use, me.y, environment, and
$. Revenue sources
6. Federal legislative
Other business
AdJouFnment
November 16, 1989
City;.
LMC Policy Adoption Registration Form
Contact Person:
Hotel Sofltel, Minneapolis
Telephone it
A.~.
N~me
Title Address Zip Code
Registration per person: $25.00
Make checks payable and
MAIL TO: Le_~_~e of Minnesota Citle.~ 183 University Avenue East, St, Paul, MN $$101
Nam~
Rep~seming
Address
Oty
MAIL TO:
Housing reservation form
League of Minnesota Cities
~601 W. ?8th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55435 -3899
(612) 835-1900
/ .... / I. / /,____- /
Check in lime 3:00 p.m. Check out time 12:00 noon
Policy Adoption Meeting
November 16, 1989
To insure space/rate availability, please respond prior lo
November 1, 1989.
Please specify: 65 + Tax Single (One Person)
65 + Tax Double CTwo People)
I will arrive after 4:00 p.m. Please guarantee the reservation
with:
(Credit Card)
Phone: ( .)
Number and Expiration Dale
PLEASE POST AND/OR DISTRIBUTE
LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION ON MINNESOTA RESOURCES
INVITES YOU TO A~END
A CONFERENCE FOCUSING ON
THE FUTURE
OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST
FUND
NATURAL RESOURCE CONGRESS
Saturday, October 28, 1989
10 AM - 5:30 PM
State Office Building - Adjacent to the Capitol
St. Paul, MN
Introduction
Representative Phyllis Kalm - Opening Remarks
Remarks on the trust fund by the co-authors of the legislation
· Representative Willard Munger
· Senator Roger Moe
II.
Panels - Nationally known experts in various resource areas will
comment on current Minnesota resource issues
The panels will nm concurrently from 11 AM - 2 PM
III.
Following will be discussion between the commission members,
conference participants and the Citizens Advisory Committee
members regarding an outline of the Strategic Plan for the
Enviromental and Natural Resources Trust Fund.
The conference is free and parking is plentiful and free (for the most part) in
the Capitol area.
For planning purposes, if possible, please RSVP . 612-296-2406
Commission Membert: Representative Phylli$ Kahn, Chair, Senators: Greg DaM. Howard Knutson.
Bob Lessard, William Luther, Gene Merriam. Roger Moe, Clarence Purfeerst, Earl Renneke,
Representatives: Glen Anderson, Doug Carlson. Virgil Johnson, Henry Kalis. Willard Munger.
Jerome Peterson, John $arna
Citizen Advisory Committee Member~: Robert Dunn, Chair. Al Brodie. C. Merle Anderson,
Ruth Fitzmaurice, Joseph Sider. Robert DeVries, JoEllen Hurr. John Rose. Jack LaVoy, Gene Doyscher.
Darby Nelson, Marcia Keller. Jacquelyn Burke-Rosholi
LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION ON MINNESOTA RESOURCES
65 STATE OFFICE BUILDING ST. PAUL, MN 55155
BOARD OF DII~CTORS
AGENDA ~
Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, October 25, 1989
Nlnnetonka Commnity Center
14600 Minnetonka Blvd., Hinnetonka
7:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: Personal Watercraft Use on Lake Minnetonka
7:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING: LMCD Board of Directors
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Reading of Minutes: 9/27/89 Regular Meeting
4. Installation of Officers
5. Public Co~aents - from persons in attendance not on agenda
Reports
A. Chair Cochran
1) Opening remarks and introduction to the 1989-90 program year
2) Committee chair appointments
a) Water Structures and Environment Committee
b) Lake Use Committee
c) Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
d) Advisory Committee
e) "Save the Lake" Fund Campaign
3) Review of combined November/December meeting schedule
4) Additional announcements
Financial Reports, Treasurer Lewman
1) Statement of Cash Transations, month ending 9/30/89
2) Quarterly financial statements
3) Audit of vouchers for payment
Standing Committees
1) EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL TASK FORCE, Chair Reese
a) Resolution concerning the Board's re-commitment to a 1990 Eurasian
Water Milfoil weed harvesting program
b) Contract for weed harvesting equipment maintenance for Lance DeTrude
c) Progress report by Contractor Rob Merila, first 30 day objectives,
progress into second 30 day objections, and current program status
6. C. 2)
ADVISORY COHHITTEE, Chair Reese, Consultant Arndorfer
a) Preparations for the 12/2/89 meeting concerning the Comprehensive
Management Plans
b) Progress on contract, subcommittee developments
c) Budget amendment to contract for printed materials
(over)
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
I~CD Board of Directors Heeting 2 Heeting October 25, 1989
6. c. 3)
6. c. 3)
6. c. 4)
6* D,
o
o
WATER STRUCTURES COMHITTEE, Chair Cochran
a) Approval of 10/14/89 minutes
b) Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Hinnetonka Boat Works, Orono
for Browns Bay/Tanager Lake, recommending approval as presented,
for distribution as required by Environmental Quality Board (copy
submitted with 10/14 committee material; distribution list attached,
site plan attached)
c) David Thomas residential development, Smithtown Bay, City of
Victoria, recommending approval of a five-slip multiple dock for
outlot and three single-slip residential docks for a total of 8 BSU
d) Shoreland Hanagement Rules facilitation by LMCD as lead agency
for MN DNR among the 14 member cities, recommending approval to
so participate; motion to authorize preparations to engage an
independent contractor to prepare technical shoreland information
for member cities
e) City of Wayzata inquiry for adding 15 slips to dock license
inappropriately tabled, staff recommending tabling motion be
rescinded and Wayzata's inquiry accepted for informational purposes
until an actual application is received
f) Deposit refunds for 1989 District Nooring Areas, recommending approval
of $100 refunds to City of Deephaven, City of Excelsior, Methodist
Lakeside Assembly, Minnetonka Yacht Club, and Wayzata Yacht Club
LAKE USE COHHITTEE, Chair Pillsbury
a) Approval of 10/16/89 minutes
b) Review of informational items I through 5, no action required
c) Special Event deposit refunds, recommending approval of $100 refunds
for Don Shelby National Invitational Bass Tournament, and for
Viking Bass Masters' Tournament
Executive Director's Report, Gene Strommen
1) Preparations for revision of position description in advance of
performance evaluation
2) Administrative priorities
Unfinished Business
A. Prosecution service review and report, Chair Cochran
New Business
A. Designation of depository for LMCD checking and. savings, recommending
The Bank Wayzata
B. Resolution for designation of officers to sign on bank instruments per
Treasurer Lawman
C. Additional new business
9. Adjournment
10-20-89
RE 'D OOT 2, 1989
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Action report of: Water Structures and Environmenal Committee
Meeting:
Saturday, October 14, 1989 7:50 a.m.
LMCD Office, Wayzata
Members present: Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; Jan Boswinkel,
Minnetonka Beach; David Cochran, Greenwood; Bert Foster,
Deephaven; Qames Grathwol, Excelsior; Douglas Babcock,
Spring Park; John Lewman, Minnetrista; Robert F'illsbury, Minne-
tonka; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Thomas Reese, Mound; Robert
Slocutn; Woodland. Also present: Frank Mixa, Consultant; Rob
Merila, Consultant; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director.
1. Preliminary review,
Minnetonka Boat Works,
Density Applications.
Environmental Assessment
Orono, New Dock License
Worksheet,
and Special
The Committee received a proposed Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EAW) for the Minnetonka Boat Works Orono Brown's Bay
and Tanager Lake new dock license for review. The EAW was
ordered by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) because the
expansion of si:.: slips on Brown's Bay and 41 slips on Tanager
Lake. The new dock license and special density permit has been
approved by the Committee, the LMCD Board, the City of Orono and
the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Before the Order can be
approved, the EAW will proceed through the EQB procedures, a
matter of 50 to 45 days. The EAW covers only the water surface
area use and does not involve any on-land considerations.
Grathwol moved, Bjorlin seconded, a recommendation to the
Board that the EAW prepared for the Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono)
expansion be approved. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Moratorium consideration for outlot development on Lake
Minnetonka for purposes of providing Lake access and dockage for
non-riparian properties.
To open discussion Grathwol moved, Cochran seconded approval
of Interim Ordinance for the F'urpose of Protecting Lake
Minnetonka, the F'lanr~ing Process, and the Health, Safety and
Welfare of the F'ubl lc, and Restricting the Licensing,
Cons'l:.ructior~ a~cl Maint. enar~ce of New Commercial and Multiple Docks
and New Docks Making Common Use of Adjacent Dock Use Areas.
Grathwol explained the Ordinance is proposed as a result of
Advi:..sc)ry Committee consideration of lake access and density. He
suggested a three year moratorium to allow time for its inclusion
in the Management Plan. According to David Arndorf er,
Consultant, because of the number of inquiries and possible
applications for" new licensing, a critical density could be
reached before adoption of the Management Plan.
Responding to a question from Reese, Grathwol said the
moratorium can be justified as a temporary measure, and he
believes it is constitutional and would not be considered a
"taking" of right.
Lewman stated it is obvious lake shore is going to be used
and it is his concern is that a moratorium on multiple docks
could result in a greater density of lake shore being subdivided
to provide smaller lake frontage lots with maximum dockage.
Frank Mixa stated the Management Plan says the District
should provide for the boats reaching the Lake through public
access points and restrict the boats reaching the Lake through
pr i rate non-ri pari an sources. Babcock suggested adding
condominium docks to the Ordinance.
Responding to a comment from Rascop, Grathwol said there is
no intent to make the Lake density uniform over-all, but it is
desirable to prohibit additional development in the dense areas.
There was a suggestion that there co~ld be a hold on
additional development by allowing docks only on property where
there is a residence. Residences should have the 4 boats
allowed reduced to 3, and the 1:50' general rule should be
changed to 1:75·.
Grathwol suggested a chanqe in 1.06 to show Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources has indicated that access with
dedicated pari::ing for' an additional 700 car/trailers will
eventually be made available. ~
Lewman
Ordinance.
voting nay.
moved, Foster seconded, to table the proposed
Motion carried, Grathwol, Rascop, Cochran and Bjorlin
Tt~e Committee indicated they would like to have further
discussion. Foster sugqested Cochran, Mixa and Arndorfer bring it
back at the next meeting
Cochran armour;ced that as Chair-elect of the Board, he will
propose, at the Board meeting in October, that Grathwol assume
the Chair of the Water Structures and Environmental Committee and
will refer this proposal to him to develop a sub-committee study
on it.
3. David Thomas residential development, Smithtown Bay, South
Upper Lake, City of Victoria,requesting a five slip outlot dock
and three residential docks on three parcels, totaling 585'
shoreline, with appropriate easements and homeowners association
to govern.
The application has been approved by the City of Victoria
Plannin_q Commission and returned to the City Council. Ed Nasek,
represented the owners. There are three lots on the lake and
five off shore with a 40' outlot with pedestrian access only.
Home Owners Association rules control the dockage of the three
lake lots to one slip each and the outlot will support five
slips. This is accomplished by an 8' outlot easement along the
shore of the three lots.
Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, a recommendation to the
Board to approve a multi-dock license for a five slip outlot dock
and three residential docks for one boat each on three parcels,
totaling 385' of shoreline, with the appropriate easements and
Home Owner Association rules to be filed with LMCD. Motion
carried unanimously.
Rascop was excused from the meeting.
4. Wayzata Yacht Club progress on considerations relating to
City of Wayzata's concern on the Yacht Club's annual license
renewal.
The Executive Director detailed the City of Wayzata's
concerns on the conduczt of the Wayzata Yacht Club license in a
memo dated 10/1~/89.
Foster responded that Wayzata Yacht Club has a registered
torrens title to their- property on file with LMCD. He stated
their lot line extends through the 33' claimed by the City. The
Yacht Club has put in a make-ready dock to facilitate launching
as well as marking of the channel as a public amenity to
accommodate the public's use of this access.
Grathwol moved, F'illsbury seconded, to ask the Executive
Director to communicate with the City of Wayzata regarding any
objections they may have to the Wayzata Yacht Club's annual
license by submitting them in writing. Motion carried
unanimously.
Babcock, Slocum, Foster and Boswinkel were excused from
meet ing.
the
5. Gayle's Marina dredging operation and commercial use of
property in violation of City of Orono B-2 zoning, communication
from the City of Orono.
]he above information was submitted by the Executive
Director for- information only purposes as the District does not
have a prohibition on commercial use of non-commercial property.
There was no action taken. Cochran indicated this could be
discussed in the future as the subject has also come up with
reference to charter boat berthing at residential lots.
3
6. Shoreland Management rules facilitation among 14 member
cities to develop uniform Lake Minnetonka Shoreland Regulations.
The Committee reviewed a report submitted to the Board at
their 9/27/89 meeting detailing the MN DNR invitation to the LMCD
to serve as the lead aqency in taking the initiative among the 14
Lake Minnetonka communities to develop a uniform set of Shoreland
Regul ati ons.
Cochran commented that, whi 1 e the MN DNR Shorel and
Regulations may differ .From the LMCD Management Plan regulations,
the difference is not great. Reese spoke in favor of the
opportunity and suggested retaining a professional planner for
presentation.
Reese moved, Pillsbury seconded, a recommendation to the
Board that the LMCD accept the MN DNR invitation. Motion carried
unani mousl y.
7. Additional business recommended by the Committee
A. lhe Executive Director reported the City of Wayzata has
indicated they will ask for a special density permit and new dock
license for fifteen additional slips at the City marina.
Grathwol moved, Bjorlin seconded,
tabled. Motion carried unanimously.
that the request be
B. Deposit Refunds Pillsbury moved, Grathwol seconded, a
recommendation to the Board that the following district mooring
area deposits be refunded: City of Deephaven, City of Excelsior,
Methodist Assembly Gr-ounds, Minnetonka Yacht Club and Wayzata
Yacht Club. Motion car-tied unanimously.
ENVIRONMENT
1. Preliminary report on weed harvesting program completed 9/29/89
Reese reported Rob Mer'ila has accomplished
activities durinfl the harvesting season and
preparinq equipment for removal from the Lake.
a variety of
currently is
Meri.la reported the machines are out of the water being and
prepared for winter'ization. The new fourth machine was water
tested and accepted. Machines 1, 2 and 5 have been updated by
United Marine International .for warranty compliance to #4's
status.
Reese
completed.
retrofiring
harvesters
reported the Atlas Mmrine Inc. contract has been
He also reported that while United Marine, Inc.
the first three harvesters the speed of the
is still not acceptable. The manufacturer specified
continued
10 mph. Harvester #3 has been tested at 5-1/2 mph and the new #4
gives only 6-1/2 mph. $20,000 has been withheld from the last
payment to U~lI until the speed issue is satisfied. UMI President
Classen has agreed to enlarging the propellers to increase speed,
the engines having ample reserve power.
2. An agreement has been prepared to hire Lance Detrude,as
an independent contractor, to do the maintenance for 30+ days at
$15.00 per hour, plus a provision for up to $10.00 per hour for
an assisEant.
Reese moved, Bjorlin seconded, a recommendation to the Board
of approval of the agreement with Lance Detrude. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. Preliminary forecast for 1990 weed
options being examined. The program
discussion was layed over.
harvesting program--the
is not complete and
4. Rob Merila performance report. The report on Rob Merila's
performance was reported as satisfactory by the Executive
Director in that he has met the first 30 day objectives set
forth. Due to Committee attendance depletion at this time the
balance of Merila's report will be submitted in writing. A
budget for maintenance will also be prepared.
5. Additional business recommended by the committee. There was
no other business.
6. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:42 a.m.
For the Committee:
Eugene Strommen, Executive Director
David Cochran, Chair
LAKE MINNE¥ONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Action Report of:
Lake Use Committee
Meeting:
Monday,October 16, 1989 4:50 p.m.
LMCD Office, Wayzata
Members present: Marvin Bjor'lin, Tonka Bay; Jan Boswinkel,
Minnetonka Beach; David Cochran, Greenwood; Bert Foster,
Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; Douglas Babcock, Spring
Park; 'Thomas Martinson, Wayzata; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka;
Thomas Reese, Mound. Also present: Eugene Strommen, Executive
Director; Lt. Larry Peterson, Sheriff's Water Patrol.
The meeting was called to order by Chair Pillsbury at 4:40 p.m.
1. Charter Boa~s
A. Berthing in residential areas, continued from September
review. There is nothing in the charter boat licensing code
which governs where the boats are to be berthed when not loading.
The Committee discussed whether the District should prohibit
berthing at residential property. The consensus was some control
should be considered, the main problem is the licensed charter
boat ~hich is also used as a personal boat by the owner. In some
cases the residential property is owned by the corporate owner of
the boat, an example being A1 & Alma's in Mound.
There was considerable discussion on marking charter boats
to identify them while operating on the lake. There was no
consensus on what is a reasonable means of marking charter boats
for identi.Fication when in operation. L.t. F'eterson said the
Water F'atrol would appreciate better marking.
F'illsbury appointed Babcock, Foster and Boswinkel to serve
as a sub-committee to identify the issues on berthing as well as
how best to identify charter boats as such when under way.
B. Stowage marking of PFD's
response
(life preservers),per DNR
The MN DNR reports that signage indicating the location
of PFDs on a boat are Coast Guard regulations which do not apply
to L. ake Minnetonka. It was agreed this is some$1hing that could
be added to the (]ode. It was referred to the sub-committee
appointed in lA above.
C. Application form review by PiIlsbury, Babcock, Sgt.
Chandler. The Commit. tee refer'red a review of proposed changes in
the application form to be used for charter boat registration to
the above mentio~ed sub-committee.
2. Citizen 8r0die Presentation. James Br0die, Minnet0nka Beach,
addressed the Committee on a problem which has developed in front
of his property. Due to the low water an unusual amount of silt
is stirred up because of the traffic in the channel about 100
yards out from his shore. This has resulted in ruining an
excellent sandy bottom. Wis suggestion is moving the channel.
The Committee received a response from Denis Bailey,
Engineering Techni ci an,Hennepin County Public Works, stating
diverting the hundreds of boats that use this channel on peak
days could congest the other channel on the north side of Areola
Reef posing a safety hazard. Bailey sees this as an unfortunate
result of the low water elevation.
Pillsbury will talk to Denis Bailey about the possibility of
"Slow" buoys and make inquiry if there have been any studies on
the effect of propellers under various rpm and speed on bottom
silt. He will report back to the Committee.
5. Personal Watercraft progress report and Preparations for the
10/25 Public Hearing. A Public Hearing will be held in the
matter of investigating the need for regulating personal
watercraft on Lake Minnetonka. The hearing will be held at the
Minnetonka Community Center, 1400 Minnetonka Blvd., City of
Minnetonka at 7 p.m. on Wednesday,October 25, 1989.
Foster has the video tape of the 9/29 noise test. He will
have it for viewing prior to the hearing. He will prepare a fact
sheet with the decibel ratings and background information. It
was agreed the hearing will be for fact gathering information, no
discussion on the comments at the hearing.
4. Winter Rules: Deicing item now out-of-date It was
that because of so few people impacted by the deicing
notation, and the large number of brochures on hand, no
will be made in the Lake Minnetonka Winter Rules until
printing is ]ustified.
agreed
permit
change
a new
5. Water Patrol Report Lt. Peterson reported five speeding
tickets were issued the first day of the Don Shelby Bass
Tournament but the tournament officials cooperated and the second
day saw an improvement. Fifty-nine BWIs were issued so far this
year.
6. Additional business
A. Reese moved, Babcock seconded, to recommend to the
Board refunds of :~1. O0.OO deposits for the Don Shelby National
Inv~ rational Bass l'ournament and Viking Bass Masters Tournament.
7. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 5:50 p.m.
For the Committee:
Euge;~e Strommen, Executive Director
Robert Pillsbury, Chair
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Regular Meeting, 7:50 p.m., September 27,
Tonka Bay City Hall
1989
1. 'The meeting was called to order by Chair Hurt at 7:52 p.m.
2. Members present: JoEllen Hurt, Chair, Orono; Jan
Boswinkel, Secretary, Minnetonka
Beach; David Cochran, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; James
Grathwol, Excelsior; Douglas Babcock, Spring Park; John Lewman,
Treasurer, Minnetrista; John Malinka, Victoria; Thomas Martinson, ~
Wayzata; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Robert Rascop, Shorewood;
Thomas Reese, Vice Chair; Mound; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also
present: Eugene Strommen, Executive Director;. Consultant Rob
Merila; Attorney Charles Lefevere, Sgt. Wm. Chandler, Sheriff's
Water Patrol.
Members absent:
Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay.
3. Reading of Minutes: Cochran moved, Martinson seconded,
approval of the minutes of the August 23, 1989 meeting. Motion
carried, Rascop voting present. Correction of the minutes of
July 26, 1989, Page 6, Paragraph 7, to indicate Pillsbury
abstained from voting.
Rascop moved, Hurr seconded, approval of the minutes of the
special meeting o-F the Board held on September 5, 1989. Motion
carried, Lewman abstaining.
4. Public Comments: Steven Tallen, LMCD prosecuting attorney,
addressed the Board regarding the lawyer selection process. He
asked the Board to check with Sgt. Chandler and Lt. Peterson
about the service he provides before the Board makes a decision.
He said a change could be more costly to the LMCD with a firm not
regularly handling Hennepin County cases because of the way he
splits the time in court with other clients being represented the
same day. He also felt there is a misunderstanding as to how
much information the Board desires from the prosecutor.
5. Reports
A. Chair Hurt
1) Hurr ar'id the Executive Director' met with Pon
Harnack and John Stine, Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) regarding management plan funding and working
agreement through MN DNR Shorel and Rules legislative
implementation authority. The DNR is reconsidering a $50,000
grant instead of the $100,000 pledged for the management plan.
On Harnack's further advice LMCD will apply for the full :~100,000
and use all resources to substantiate the claim. Hurr expressed
optimism about obtaining full funding.
LMCD Board of Directors - September 27, 1989
Hurr reported the MN DNR has invited the LMCD to set.ye as
the lead agency in taking the initiative among the 14 Lake
Minne~.onka communities to develop a uniform set of Shoreland
f:::eq L~ .[ at i OhS. l'he Ex ecut i ve Di rector presented a report
datedg/27/89 explaining the role of the LMCD in developing the
re.qul ations.
Grathwol moved, F'illsbucy seconded, to refer the MN DNR
invitation to the Water Structures and Environment Committee for
review and report in October. Motion carried unanimously.
2) Election recommendation for LMCD officers 1989-1990
The Board agreed to hold the election of officers for 1989-1990
at this meeting rather than delaying to October. ]'he item was
added to the end of the agenda.
5. B. Financial Reports, ]'reasurer Lewman
1) Lewman submitted a (:ash flow statement as of
8/31/89, commenting it r'ef 1 ects a change from the previous
statement which did not show transfers from the investment fund
to checking balance.
2) Lewman moved, Grathwol seconded, approval of
payment totaling *166,094.47, check numbers 5652 through
Motion carried unanimously.
bills
5688.
Lewman moved, Foster seconded, to approve payment
to United Marine International, Inc. of $60,526. for the fourth
harvester- upon satisfactory testing and modifications on the
other harvesters. It is noted this reflects a late delivery
penalty of $11,850. Motion carried, Pillsbury and Rascop voting
nay.
5. C. Standing' Committees
1) WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Cochran
a) Cochr-an moved, Reese seconded, approval
9/9/89 minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
o'f
b) Rockvam Boat Yards Cochran moved, Pillsbury
seconded, appr-owsl of a tempor-ary low water variance to allow
Rockvam Boat Yards to move si:.', temporary "pontoon" slips from
site #1 to site #2, noting when water- levels permit the slips
will revert to regular slips at site #1, the temporary slips to
be discontinued. Motion carried unanimously.
c) Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono) Order for
approval , per committee r-ecommendation, with the additional
stipulation subject to Environmental Assessment Worksheet
requirement as ordered by the Environmental Quality Board.
2
LMCD Board 0f DirectOrs -September ~7, 1989
The Board reviewed Environmental Quality Board
correspondence of 9/19/89 stating the need for an EAW. The
Executive Director reported documentation for the EAW is being
prepared. A motion to approve the Order subject to
recommendations of the EAW was withdrawn upon advice of Counsel.
Cochran moved, F'illsbury seconded, tabling of the
until the EAW is completed. Motion carried unanimously.
Order
d) Minnetonka Boat Works (Wayzata) Order for
approval. Cochran moved, Reese seconded, approval of the Order
accepting the Committee recommendation that the requirement of
sponsoring an annual bass fishing tournament be eliminated from
the list of amenities. Motion carried, Rascop voting nay as he
believes the variance is extending the docks beyond 1OO~ (without
applicant adequately demonstrating the required hardship).
e) Minnetonka Yacht Club/Lake Minnetonka Sailing
School Order for Approval. Cochran moved, Grathwol seconded,
approval of the Order accepting the Committee recommendation for
the following change: c) to read .... the right to operate
instead of ~~)__n_ sailing school for members of the general
public which could instead of ~].~.~! train approximately 400 or
more students per year-. Motion carried unanimously.
f and g) Deicing public hearing review The Board
received a proposed Code Amendment to the Ordinance relating to
deicing installation of the Lake. Foster recommended the
following changes in Section 2 Subd. 1:
(a) .E._,'_.LC_~_t_ ..a..~D. p__r_o_v..~_d...e_~i~ ~.._n__ p_.a?__a~g_r_ap_.O_ _d_)_ _o..f_ _t_h_i__s... Subdivision~
the entire area of open water or weakened ice is not enclosed by
an opmqoe semi-opaque fence which is at least four feet in
height;
(b) The .e.._n..t_i~_r_~ fence~, mhd the ene~re area enclosed by the
fence and the en~pe area de-iced is not ~o~.t-y lighted from one-
half hour before sunset to one-half hour after sunrise;
(c) The e=.ot_.i__r_~ fenced area is not marked by reflectorized
warning signs at least every fifty feet around the perimeter of
the fence.
(d) Change opaque to semi-opaque
Discussion centered on the need to light the entire
without overlighting.
area
Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to accept the first reading
of Ordinance No. 104, An Ordinance Relating to Deicing
Installations on the Lake; Amending LMCD /code Section 2.06,
Subd. 3 deleting last sentence - "Permanent dock permits shall
not be granted where deicing equipment is needed" and Section
~ 09, Subdivisions i and 1~'~, Subd. 10 being deleted;to waive the
second and third reading; and to adopt the Ordinance. Motion
carried unanimously.
LHCD Board of Directors - September 27, 198c?
Foster moved, Babcock seconded, direction to staff that for the
1989-9(:) licensing season the deadline date for application be
moved forward from October I to November 1. Motion carried
unanimously.
It was noted this amendmer-~t now permits new permanent
if deicing equipment is needed.
docks
h) Bean's Greenwood Marina application for 110
slips plus 10 tie-On/service slips. The City of Greenwood has an
agreement with Bean's, signed in 1977, wherein he agreed to have
no more than 100 slips plus 10 tie-on/service slips. The
Executive Director reported Bean has moved the boats from the
disputed area. ~
Hurt moved, Grathwol seconded, to refer Bean's
Marina application back to the Committee for
information. Motion carried unanimously.
Greenwood
complete
i ) Smith's Bay Marina and Yacht Club
recommendation to remove the 9 feet of dock that is beyond 200
feet into the Lake, as determined from an April 1988 inspection
in violation of the license. The Executive Director, along with
information from Charles Mel uny, Doc;:: Inspector, reported a
discrepancy in the point of measurement, taken from the seawall
which is 6' behind the 929.40HW mark. A re-inspection verified
the dock is 194~, 197-1/2~ and 205~ from the 929.40HW point of
measurement as referenced on the as-built survey, the average
being less than 200·.
Reese moved, ~rathwol secor~ded, approval of the Smith's Bay
Marina and Yacht Club license, disregarding the minimal distance
error. Motion carried unanimously.
Gerald Toberman, o~.ner of the subject marina, said, in
response to Chair Hurr's request, he will allocate a slip to the
Sheriff's Water Patrol and allow them use of his ramp. Sgt.
Chandler expressed appreciation.
~) Pillsbury reported a Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District meeting on 9/28/89 could resolve the Libbs Lake dredging
problem.
k) Grath~,ol questior~ed whether a series of docks
on the Greenwood side of Manor Road, on St. Alban's Bay, are in
conformation with LMCD Ordinance. 'The Executive Director
reported the area consists of a series of 25 foot lots in
Greenwood, some of ~hich are owned by each of the two land
developers on the Shore~,~ood side of Manor Road. The developer
has met LMCD requirements by using combir~ed doc;:: use areas,
placing a three-slip and four-slip seasonal dock on the lots.
H'~e developer also I~as a dred~.~.nq permit to improve water- access,
-- continued
LMCD Board o'f Directors - September 27, 1989
the dredging not yet done. The City of Greenwood has enacted a
moratorium on octtlot dockage, but the developer installed the
docks prior to the moratorium. Cochran assured the Board the
Committee will continue to study the situation.
5. C. 2) EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL TASK FORCE, Chair Reese
a) Reese introduced Rob Merila to the Board.
Merila reported the harvesters are working on the entire lak'e and
will finish this week. They have harvested in excess of 600
acres of the amended 750 acre permit. A UMI harvester
manufacturer mechanic will accompany the fourth harvester and
make necessary adjustments and modifications to the other three
machines. LMCD will contract for a mechanic to winterize the
equipment. Temporary storage has been obtained at a Hennepin
County maintenance yard in Spring Park. Alternatives are being
investigated for possible indoor storage. Minnetonka Boat Works
has offered to assist in shrink wrapping the machinery for
outdoor storage if necessary.
b> Hurt and Merila visited management
Chataqua, Lakewood, New York and observed their
operation. They learned a great deal about
maintenance and their annual operation.
at Lake
harvester
equipment
c) Reese submitted Change Orders #2 and #5 to the
contract with Atlas Marine. Change Order#2 sets forth the terms
for use of a harvester provided by Atlas Marine to supplement UMI
equipment. Change Order #5 provides for rate changes for three-
harvester-cutting rate as of 9/15/89. Rascop questioned Atlas'
previous offer of a truck until the 5rd harvester arrived,
believing they stated a truck would be provided throughout the
Atlas Harvester use. The E;.,'ecutive Director stated this was
amended to the time of the 5rd harvester's arrival.
Boswinkel moved, Grathwol seconded, approval of Change Order
#2 and #3 to the contract with Atlas Marine. Motion carried
unani mousl y.
d) Reese reported the request for Corps of
Engineer (C/E> matching funds for 1990 has been completed and has
been forwarded to Washington, D. []. for approval. The C/E will
require a feasibility study, part of which has been done this
summer. Without these matching funds it will be difficult to
operate in 1990 at the same level as in 1989. Reese is looking
forward to improvements in the 1990 operation and at the same
time is satisfied with tl~e acco~nplishments in 1989.
[]hair Hurr and the Executive Director met with Hennepin
County Public Works Director Pat Murphy to provide a project
supervisor, truck and disposal site for the weeds. The County is
experimenting with mixing lake weeds with leaves and grass
clippings at a compost site.
LMCD Board of Directors - September 2Z, 1989
Reese reported the Fresh Water Foundation has hired a
research director who will head up the scientific research sub-
committee on Eurasian water Milfoil task .force.. The MN DNR
conducted Sonar weed herbicide test studies in Carson's, Gray's
and Smith's Bays. There is also a report of an insect which
eats milfoil. The search for alternate sources of Eurasian water
Milfoil control or eradication is on-going.
Grathwol recommended the Board publicly recognize the weed
harvesting program as having been done in a positive manner. The
Board concurred. Hurr added that a vigorous fund raising program
will have to be carried on in the coming year to fund the
operati on.
5. C. 5) LAKE USE COMMITTEE, Chair Pillsbury
a) F'illsbury moved, Foster seconded, approval of
the 9/18/89 minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
b) Personal Watercraft Foster reported on the
meeting with Personal Watercraft industry representatives held on
9/19/89. The representat i vms present ac knowl edge they have
similar problems all over the country. Manufacturers have reduced
the noise level to national 82.4 DBA standards, but major noise
problems result from after-manufacture equipment and
modifications added to the machines. The group present basically
concurred with the LMCD analysis prepared by Foster,but feel the
1~)00' operating distance from shore is too far. On 9/29/89, at
Water Patrol Headquarters in Sprinq F'ark a noise test will be
held at 50' , 100' , 500' , and 1000° distances. At least four
manufacturers will brinq equipment. Monitoring equipment will be
furnished by the Water F'atrol and Pollution Control Agency.
Other comments: Boswinkel: Reduce the allowable decibel
rate. Babcock: Would like to see a hard approach to prohibiting
after-manufacture equipment. Hurt: The manufacturers appreciate
the opportunity to be heard before action is taken. Rascop:
Would like to see statistics on accidents, etc. Chandler reported
they are surprisingly few on Lake Minnetonka.
c and d) Charter boat registration proposed Code
amendment. Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, to approve an
amendment to the charter boat registration code which will change
the application due date from May I to March 1, and to prohibit
charter boats from operatinq until Water Patrol/DNR inspections
have been passed and all LMCD registration requirements are met.
Motion carried unanimously.
There was a discussion of identification of charter boats by
some type of signage to identify their use. There was no action.
LMCD Board of Directors - September 27, 1989
e) Rascop moved, Pillsbury seconded, refunds
of fees to the following special event permit holders: Mound
City Days, Zuhrah Shrine Skippers~ Lake Masters Swim Club~
Antique & Classic Boat Parade, Wednesday Night Bass Tournaments
and MN/WI Pro-Am Bass Tournaments, detail in list of approved
vouchers. Motion carried unanimously. Refund was declined on the
Westonka Crappie Tournament as a result of attorney fees and
staff time resulting .From tournament officials not securing a
water patrol permit after several reminders.
f) Water Patrol Report Sgt. Chandler
reported 57 BWIs issued. One full-time deputy has been
transferred to other duties. He had no information on a
replacement. The Board was in~ited to the Water Patrol Annual
Dinner to be held the evening of 11/18/89 at the Excelsior Bay
Yacht Club.
5. C. 4) ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chair Reese, Consultant
Arndorfer.
a) Arndorfer presented a quarterly progress
report explaining the restrictions to be used as density
increases. A key consideration is as the lake use acres per boat
count goes down the restrictions on access will have to increase.
A number of options on how to achieve this were presented.
b) Arndorfer continues to develop the agenda
for the management plan information meeting. He is looking for
Advisory Committee members to present the different topics.
Local officials, county officials, regional agencies and state
agencies as well as the LMCD board members have been invited.
(The date has subsequently been changed to Saturday, December 2,
Lafayette Club.)
5. C. 5. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT, Gene Strommen
a) '[he Executive Director reported the
Bookkeeper-Clerk is leaving LMCD employment the third week in
September. She voluntarily resigned due to non-compatibility
with the District's bookkeeping requirements.
Rascop moved, Reese seconded, to authorize the Executive
Director to hire a replacement at ~-{8.00 per hour under the
established job description. Motion carried unanimously.
b) l'he Executive Director reported he along
wi th Reese will make presentations at a two-day State Lake
Management Conference i n Mi nneapol i s. He wi 11 address how
shoreland management can work in an urban lake setting. Reese
will speak on the Eurasian water Milfoil program.
LMCD Board of Director's - September 27, 198~
c) l'he Executive Director appeared on a
Cable 'IV with four city managers and discussed Milfoil and the
Management Plan.
d) Grathwol suggested a review of the
executive director's position and performance is likely due. A
review of the Executive Director's view of the position, past and
future, would be valuable at this time.
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Legal service selection in response
Committee's recommendation of two finalists.
to Selection
Before the legal service selection, Lefevere clarified that
despite rumors he is interested in continuing as Counsel for the
LMCD. ;.~e would appreciate a dialogue about the concerns the
Board has with his service. On his part there is a need for a
clarification of who can talk to the attorney, who gives
direction and can the attorney initiate projects. Lefevere left
the room at this time.
Hurt responded the current opening of consideration for the
position of Counsel results from a desire to periodically open
appointed positions for review. Another factor was Lefevere~s
change of firms. Once the Board decision was made to open the
position in Apr~ 1, to requests for proposals, fifteen firms
applied for the position. Applications ~ere available for review
by all the LMCD Board members. An appointed committee of the
officers and Grath~ol selected six firms for personal interview.
Aqain al. 1 directors were invited to participate in the interviews
by written notice. Finally t~o firms selected for Board
consideration were Best and Flanagan and Huff and Allen.
Grakhwol moved, Bos~.~inkel seconded, appointment of Robert
Meller, Jr. of Best and Fl anagan as Counsel to the LMCD.
DISCUSSION: Grathwol discussed the selection process and
indicated he believed the process was fairly handled. He felt
the officers must have confidence in the legal counsel.
Officers who have the working relationship with the attorney,
indicated they have a lack of confidence in Lefevere and are
entitled to have counsel, in ~-~hi ch they have confidence.
Reese specifically mentioned his dissatisfaction with the
codification o~ the ordinances and preparation of the contracts
for the weed harvesting proqram.
There was discussion of cost. Grathwol responded that cost
was not a factor in changing attorneys as activity more than
anythin~q else controls cost. Reese noted Best and Flanagan are
willinq to negotiate a flat fee retainer. Hurr noted Best and
Flanaqan will bear the start up costs by doing some self-training
on LMCD·s operation.
L~ICD 80ard of Directors - September 27, 1989
Several Board members commented for LeFevere as follows:
(Lewman) - spoke on behalf of the value of continuity;
(Cochran) - expressed his concerns about the selection
process which resulted in three board members make the
recommendation, two of whom he believed held biases,that an
interview schedule was set in which LeFevere personally was not
interviewed, (as was the case with another firm's representative
being substituted), Lefevere has not lost a civil case, he
prevailed over a Corps of Engineer's case and believes he has
done what he was asked.
(Slocum) - believes the possibility of a conflict of
interest could exist as Best and Flanagan represents the City of
Wayzata.
(Pillsbury) - suggested an opinion from the Professional
Responsibility Board of the Bar Association.
Slocum) - suggested the selection of the attorney be made
after the election of officers.
Martinson moved, Rascop seconded, to table the selection of
an attorney until after the election of officers. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Election of Officers
Hurt announced nominations from the floor for the
' office of Chair were open, stating she would be interested in
serving one additional year, particularly to assist in LMCD's
funding needs.
Slocum moved, Rascop seconded, to nominate David Cochran for
the position of Chair.
Reese moved, Boswinkel seconded,to nominate JoEllen Hurt for
the position of Chair.
Rascop moved, Lewman seconded, that nominations be
Motion carried unanimously.
closed.
Hurr called for a written ballot and appointed LeFevere and
the recording secretary as tally clerks.
Lefevere announced the following vote:
David Cochr-an 9 w~tes
JoEllen Hurt 4 votes
Cochran was declar-ed elected for- a one year- term e.f-fective
with the October 25, 1989 Board of Directors installation.
Hurr called for nominations for Vice Chair.
Rascop moved, Fluff seconded, to nominate Robert Slocum for
the position o.~ Vice [;hair. Slocum declined the nomination.
LMCD Board of Director-s - September 27, 1989
PillsbUry moved, Babcock seconded, to nominate Bert Foster
for the position o.f Vice Chair.
Bos~.~inkel mow?d, Martinson seconded, to nominate lhomas
Reese for the position of Vice Chair.
Hurt moved, Babcock seconded, to nominate James Grathwol for
Vice Chair. Grath~.~ol declined the nomination.
F'illsbury moved, Rascop seconded,that nominations be closed.
Motion carried unanimously.
Lefevere announced the following vote:
Bert Foster' 9 votes
Thomas Reese 4 votes
Foster was declared elected Vice Chair for a one year term
effective ~ith the October 25, 1989 Board of Directors'
instal 1 ation.
Hurr declared nominations open for the office of Secretary.
F'illsbury moved, Malinka seconded, to nominate Jan Boswinkel
as Secretary.
Rascop moved, Grathwol seconded, that nominations be closed
and a unanimous ballot be cast -for Jan Boswinkel as Secretary.
Motio~ carried unanimously.
Jan Boswinkel was declared elected to the office of
Secretary for a one year term effective with the October 25, 1989
Board of Directors installation.
Hurt declared nominations open for the office of Treasurer.
Rascop moved, F'illsbury seconded,to nominate John Lewman as
Treasurer.
Bos~inkel moved, Slocum seconded, that nominations be closed
and a unanimous ballot be cast for John Lewman as Treasurer.
Motion carried unanimously.
John Lewman was declared elected as Treasurer for' a one year
term effective with the October ~=,
:-~ 1989 Board of Directors
instal lation.
G ~-' a '1: f"~ ~ o 1 .... ~ ~, 'l
e..pre_:~s~r ti~anl::s, on behalf of the Board, to Reese
and Hurr- .for' their' set'vices. The Executive Director,on behalf of
the staff, recognized F:¢eese and Hurr have been untiring in their
service to the l)istr"ic.t.
10
LMCQ Board Di 'ect0rs - September 27, 1989
D. Appointment of Attorney (continued)
Rascop moved, Pillsbury seconded, that the LMCD retain
Charles Lefevere of Holmes ~ Graven as counsel. Motion carried~
Hurt abstaining.
Rascop stated he would like to have the current prosecutor
replaced. Lefevere said in fairness to present prosecutor that
he be given an opportunity to respond to any allegations made
against him. He further stated he has no problem working with
anyone appointed. Cochran requested a further examination of the
appointment. Malinka asked for a report of prosecutions, out-
come and cost vs. receipts.
Babcock moved, Lewman seconded, to refer the appointment of
a prosecutor to the officers for a recommendation. Motion
carried unanimously.
7. New Business
Board.,
3'here was no other business to come before the
8. Adjournment Martinson moved, Malinka seconded,that the
meeting be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 11 p.m.
JoEllen Hurt, Chair
Jan Boswinkel, Secretary
11
CITY of MOUND
534! M~,YWOOD ROAD
MOUN2 MINNESOTA 553~4
,6'2) 472-1155
September 8, 1989
Curt Pearson
1100 First Bank Place West
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Dear Curt:
In the process of a local contractor building a home, it vas..discovered by
the Contractor and the City of Mound that the lot on which the house was
being built had a sanitary sewer service. The property adjacent to where
the new house was being built was connected to the sewer service. This
occurred because the same person owned the existing house property as well
as the vacant lot property where the new house is being built. This
apparently happened in the mid 1960's when sewer service was supplied to
the area.
The property in question is located on Lakewood Lane, behind city hall.
The new house currently has a temporary sanitary sewer service, but under
ordinance, sanitary sewer services are supposed to be individually
connected to the sanitary sewer main. The problem gets further complicated
in that the owner of the existing property is undergoing some personal
problems and financially she cannot afford to have her se~er service
reconnected. The sewer service that is there is on the lot that supplies
the new house. '-
I have spoken to the existing property owner as well as the contractor
building the new house. The contractor is the owner of the lot and is
intending to sell the property upon completion of the house. Both parties
are concerned about the city's requirement to have separate sewer services.
They understand it, however, the existing house owner cannot afford to pay
the cost (roughly $2000 - $3000). The builder of the new house is afraid
of sewer backup due to sharing the same service. Re is also concerned
about marketing the property and being able to convey title to a new owner
should the property be sold.
My question to you is can the City of Mound have the sanitary sewer service
for the existing house reconnected and the assessment of such a cost be
placed on the property's taxes? It would be my interpretation that the
City could not do the work and assess it as a special assessment type of
project that we would normally do since we are dealing with private
Curt Pearson
September 8, 1989
Page 2
services. However, since our ordinance does require that we have separate
sanitary sewer service connections, that perhaps, we could place the bill
on her taxes to accomplish satisfaction of the ordinance as well preventing
any liability that the City might have and any problema that it might cause
for the new house. Please respond to me on this as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Shukle, Jr.
City Manager
P.S. I have discussed this with Greg Skinner, Water and Sewer
Superintendent. He has sent them a letter based upon my direction that we
follow the ordinance and have the sanitary sewer service recommected by
November 1, 1989. However, I received a visit from the contractor this
morning who is trying to work this thing out so that the ordinance gets
satisfied, but also that financial burden is not am immediate one for the
property owner who has to pay for this. It should be noted that the
temporary service would last for some time. But again, we could run into
problems with sewer backup.
ES:Is
October 5, 1989
Mr. Curt Pearson
1100 First Bank Place West
Minneapolis, M~ 55402
Dear Curt:
I sent a letter to you dated September 8, 1989, regarding a
connection for a private homeowner on Lakewood Lane in the City of
Enclosed is a copy of that letter for your review.
sewer
Mound.
We discussed this matter on the telephone and you indicated that due to the
circumstances of the homeowner, the City could hire a contractor to perform
the sewer connection and then assess the cost back to the property owner
over a three to five year period. I have received two quotations on the
sewer connection. The Iow quote is for $955, the other quote is for $1250.
Obviously, we would take the lower quote and calculate over five years at
an interest rate of 8% what the assessments would be beginning in 1991.
I have spoken to the homeowner, Mrs. Sandy Bastien, 2541Lakewood Lane, and
she is in agreement with the City of Mound having the work done and
assessing her on her real estate taxes.
I think we should draft a formal agreement to this effect and have her sign
it. There isn't any ordinance that allows us to do this and I think it
would be in our best interests to have an agreement where Mrs. Bastien
understands that these assessments will be placed on her taxes for the
years 1991 through 1995. There isn't any engineering involved. However,
there would be costs from you with regard to drafting an agreement as well
as the possibility of additional costs should the contractor run into
problems while he is reconnecting the sewer service. Typically this is
done on a time and material basis.
that dces not d,scr~mlnate or' '"'e cas~s of race color, r-at~onat orig,n Dr ha'qd capped sta',~s
Mr. Curt Pearson
October 5, 1989
Page 2
Do you agree with drafting an agreement? If so, what would be the legal
costs from your standpoint? Enclosed is a tabulation of the principal and
interest payments as calculated by John Norman, Finance Director. Also
enclosed are copies of the quotations to do the work. Please review this
issue and get back to me as soon as possible. We would like to have the
project started as early as the week of October 9, 1989. I look forward to
hearing from you.
Sin,cere ly,
Edward J4 Shu~kle, Jr.
City Manager
eric.
ES:is
A. THOMAS WURST, P.A.
CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A.
JAMES D. LANSON, P.A.
THOI',4A$ F, UNDERWOOD, P.A.
CRAIG IMI. HERTZ
ROGER U. FELLOWS
LAW OFFICES
WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ
IlO0 FIRST BANK PLACE WEST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA $540a
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
October 16, 1989
OCT 1. '7 1989
(6i~:) 338-Z625
Re: Lakewood Lane Sewer Connection
Dear Ed:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of October
5, 1989, concerning the need to correct the sewer service connection
for Sandy Bastien, a home owner at 2541 Lakewood Lane. You in-
dicate to me that she does not have the necessary money to make
the service connection but will agree with the City of Mound
to have the City do the work and then special assess the costs
against her property.
I therefore recommend that we proceed under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429, and there is authority in that Chapter
as well as Chapters 412 and 444 to allow the City to make service
connections and to special assess the costs back against the
property.
I am enclosing herewith a petition by which Mrs. Bastien
and any other owners of the property petition the City of Mound
· . .
to make the improvements The precise znformat~on should be
clarified and ~ritten into the petition. The petition provides
that we may proceed with the improvement without holding a
public° hear[n
easement or entrance permit, and since I do not know the legal
description, I have enclosed a blank easement form and suggest
that this be completed and that a temporary easement be signed
by her authorizing you to go on the property and on the area
legally described for whatever a reasonable period of time
it takes to complete the connection.
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ
Page 2
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
October 16, 1989
You have also indicated you want an agreement prepared
for her to sign and I have drafted such an agreement and enclose
it herewith, but I can only do it in a form which requires
you to fill in the details and complete it, or you can send
it back to us and we will put it in final form. You have also
indicated that you have a bid of $955 to do the work but that
includes no restoration work which Greg has indicated will
amount to about $400 and includes no City services of any form
or fashion. You can use the ~greement form I have enclosed
or you can wait and ask her to s~gn ~ afner you--d-u--have ail t~?
~ills incurred_. I am estimating tha'~ our Charges on this will
*be approximately $150 if the enclosed materials satisfy your
needs. If you have to go beyond that, please be advised that
additional monies will be necessarz~
/
Cur~s ^. Pearson
City~^ttorney
CAP:Ih
Enclosures
CI'FY ,X IOUNI)
5~2; 472-!
October 20, 1989
Mrs. Sandy Bastien
2541Lakewood Lane
Mound, Mn 55364
Dear Sandy:
Enclosed are the following:
2.
3.
4.
Petition for local improvement
Easement
Agreement to special assessments
Special assessment payment schedule
The above is in reference to the sanitary sewer connection that we have
discussed previously. This will appear on the City Council agenda on
Tuesday, October 24th. It is necessary for you to sign the enclosed copies
and return them to me by Tuesday, October 24th.
The petition states that you are in favor of this improvement and are
agreeing to the special assessment that will be levied against your
property. The temporary easement that is also enclosed allows the City or
its contractor to enter and work on your property. We have stated an
expiration date of June 1, 1990, which will allow enough time to handle any
restoration work that would have to be done due to the project. The
agreement to special assessments basically states that you are agreeing to
this sewer connection and agreeing to paying for it under a special
assessment procedure.
The easement represents the ability for the City and/or contractor to work
on your property. The date of expiration is June 1, 1990, this will allow
sufficient time to do the restoration work that will be needed. The final
document enclosed is an example of the special assessment system.
Mrs. Sandy Bastien
October 20, 1989
Page 2
It shows a $2000 assessment over 10 years at 8~ interest. This is likely
to change since the amount of the project is only an estimate at this time.
We will revise the special assessment procedure when we know what the final
project costs are.
Therefore, please sing the petition, easement and agreement to special
assessments and return them by October 24th. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me. '
._~Siacere 1~,
Edward' J. Shukle, Jr.
City Manager
cc: Greg Skinner, Water and Sewer Superintendent
John Norman, Finance Director
ES:Is
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA:
We, the undersigned, are all the owners of real property located at
2541 Lakewood Lane, Mound, Minnesota, and hereby petition to have the said
property connected to the sanitary sewer connection which is in place to
serve said property and, in accordance with M.S.A. 429.031, Subd. 1, hereby
waive any public hearing to be held on said improvement. We further state
and agree that we are all the owners of said property and further state that
by this petition we waive any rights to question the amount or the validity
of .the special assessment levied against our property.
(Address)
AGREEMENT TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
It is hereby agreed by and between Sandy Bastien, who is the owner
of property at 2541 Lakewood Lane, Mound, Minnesota, legally described as
set forth in Exhibit A as attached hereto and made a part of this agreement,
and the City of Mound, a municipal corporation, as follows..
1. The property at 2541 Lakewood Lane, Mound, Minnesota, is
connected to the wrong sanitary sewer connection. When the original
connection was made, the property owner owned two lots, and the home at 2541
Lakewood Lane was connected to the wrong sewer connection.
2. A new home has now been built on the abutting property, and
it is necessary that that home connect to the service which is currently
being utilized by the property at 2541 Lakewood Lane. The property owner
at 2541 Lakewood Lane has agreed to correct this error by connecting to the
proper sewer service connection, but it is estimated that the cost of such
connection could run between $2,000 and $3,000, and the property owner at
2541 Lakewood Lane does not have the financial capability to pay this amount
at this time and therefore has petitioned the City to special assess her
property.
3. Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 412, 429, and 444, and other
governmental regulations concerning the health, safety, and general
welfare provide authority for the City of Mound to make improvements to the
service connection and to connect toilet facilities with the municipal
sanitary sewer system. It is hereby determined that this authority should
be utilized, and the City of Mound can do the work and special assess the
property under that statutory authority. Quotations have been received to
make the connection, and in addition to the physical connection of the
existing sewer service to the property at 2541 Lakewood Lane, it will be
necessary to restore the property disturbed by the connection, and there
are other costs and expenses to be incurred by the City of Mound which are
attributable to this special assessment. The owner hereby agrees that a
special assessment may be secured against her home at 2541 Lakewood Lane,
Mound, Minnesota, in an amount not to exceed $2,000, nor may it exceed the
cost of the project. If the City determines in doing the work that there is
some reason the costs will exceed $2,000, the City agrees to contact Mrs.
Bastien and to obtain her approval for those additional expenses.
4. Sandy Bastien indicates that she is the owner of the
property located at 2541 Lakewood Lane, legally described in Exhibit A, and
hereby requests the City of Mound to levy special assessments payable over a
five year period against her property to cover all the costs and expenses
incurred in connecting her home to the sanitary sewer located in Lakewood
Lane. Said assessments shall be made and filed with the County Auditor in
accordance with the authority contained in Minnesota Statutes Section
'429.061. The owner hereby agrees to waive any and all objection to the
special assessment and agrees to pay 100% of the costs.
5. The City of Mound hereby enters into this agreement and
agrees to do the work based on the request made by the property owner as
stated herein.
Sandy Bastien, Owner
City of Mound
By~
Mayor
By.
City Manager
EAS~NT
WIS AGR]~F..M]~T]' lade thia 24th dly O~ October
bet-,eeen
Sandra K. Bast~en
part y of the first pert. end THE CIT~OF MOUe. a municipal corporation under the la~s
of the State of Minnesota. party of the second part.
WITNESSET~: That the part y of the first part, in consideration of the su~of
ONE DOLLARANDOTHERGOODANDVALUABLECONSIDERATION, to her in hand paid by said party
of the second part, the receipt of ~hich is hereby acknowledged, do es hereby grant and
convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, an easement over
certain lands located in Hennepin County. Minnesota. as follows:
Lot 3 and that part of Lot 2 lying NEly of a line drawn from a pt. in SEly line
thor dist. 45.50 ft. SWly from most Ely cot thor to a pt in NEly line of
Lot 2 dist. 200 ft. NWly from most Ely cot thor, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit D.
Temporary Construction Easement to expire June 1
, 1990.
State Deed Tax Due Hereon: None
IN TESTIMONYWH~REOF. the said party
day and year first above vritten.
THIS FORM PREPARED MY:
Francene C. Clark-Leislnger
City Clerk
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN. 55364
Affects Certificate No.
has hereunto set her
hand the
SANDRA K. BASTIEN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
SS.
The foregoing instrument
was ecknc~ledged before me this .~I1. day of
S ullivans
ervices, Inc.
3660 HWY. 101 SO. SEWER, WATER & EXCAVATING CONTRACTOR
WAYZATA, MN 55391
473-4300
lrup sa[ · Pa e .o. o,
Pages
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO
STREET
2541 Lakewood Lane
CITY,STATE AND ZIP CODE
Attention:
164
PHON[ I DAT[
472-1563 472-6294 August 31,
JOB NAME v
JOB LOCATION
rJoB PHONE
1q~9
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
Uncover sewer line on west side of driveway, reroute
under concrete driveway, then across yard to service.
TOTAL COST.... .... $1,250.00
Owner to pay all City Charges.
Note:
No sod, seed or black dirt fissured.
CONDfTK~: We rese~e ~e right to file a Meo~an~C's Lm~ if bill is not pad (in full) wi~in 30 days of complepon of wo~.
If we do file a mechanCs lien after the bill has bee~ un0aid for 30 days. yo~ agree Io pay all costs wh~::~h we incur in filing such a lien. including reasonable attorney's fees. Also. in the event we do ncx file a
meohanK:'s ~ or in the event we choose no~ to foreck:~e a film:l rnechanic's lien ~ legal actK~ becomes r,,eces, sa~ to coflect this bill rewesenting Ibis work do~e under this l:~0posal, you agree to pay all
COsts wh~ we actually incur in the collecPon of this bill, ~ncluding reasonable altorney's fees.
We will no( be responsible for any underground utildmS bhal cannot be located by the Utility Companies or the Homeowner.
In bedding lob we figure soft to be dry. If wet there wdl be exlra cha~ges based on time and malarial No~nal clean-up ~ ~ncluded ~n this p*'ooosal. There ~s no sod figured in this Woposal. We will no{ assume the
responsibd~y tor water p~oes, l~ees, Ires roots, split, let systems etc. u~less notified lo exact Iocat~o~ p~o' to excavating. Frost r~Oing ex~'a charge
hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
One Thnu~nd Tiao N-ndred Ft£~y..
Payment to be made as follows:
On Completion of Job
dollars ($ 1;250,00 ).
AJI meterie/ ~ guaranteed to be as Sl~cified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike
n'~n~er according to standard practices. All asreements continlBent upon strikes, accidents
M' dela~ beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance.
O~r ~rkers are fully covered by Workmen'$ Compensation Insurance.
Auth°rized v~~ ~ ~
Signature
Note: This proposal may be
withdrawn by us if not accepted
~ ~ t~s. ~e a~e ~s. ~ ~ ~s ~e ~f~ ~ ~e h~ Signature
~. Y~ ~e au~iz~ to ~ ~e w~ ~ ~. Paint will ~ ma~ ~ ~tli~ ~e.
__ days.
Date of Acceptance: Signature
WlDMER INC.
P.O. Box 219
ST. BONIFACIUS, MINNESOTA 55375
Phone 446-1495
Page No. of
Pages
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO
STREET
CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE
ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS
PHONE
JOl~ NAME
JOB LOCATION
DATE
JOB PHONE
We hereby submit spec~ficahons and estimates for:
We reserve the right to file a Mechanics Lien If bill Is not paid within the length of time prescribed by law. You agree to pay all cost
Incurred pertainln8 to lien. We will not be responsible for any underground utilities that cannot be located by the utility companies
or the homeowner. Normal clean-up Is Included In this proposal. There Is no sod figured In this proposal. We will not assume the
responsibility for water pipes, trees, tree roots, sprinkler systems, etc. unless notified to exact location prior to excavatln&. Frost
ripping extra charge. It Is expressly stipulated and agreed that the undersigned shall not be held liable for damages to grass, trees,
shrubs and any underground obstructions, Including pipes, electrical wiring and etc. In bidding job we figure soil to dw. If wet. there
will be e~tra char~es based on time and material
II PaymApt to be made as follows :~,~ / ~'~/
hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of:
A finance charfe of 1.5% per month (18% annual rate) will be charl~ed on past due accounts.
AIl material is g ..... tee-d to be as specified. Ail work to be completed ...... kmanlike ~ ....-~ / -- ~
m.nner acco ingto stand.rd,r, ct*e,. Anyalterat ..... dev,ation, .... bove,,.,f,ca.
tions in~ing extra costs will be executed only u~n wr~en orders, and will become an Signature / ~ , ~
~tra cha~e over and a~ve the estimate. All agreements contingent upon str~kes, accidents ~
~ de~ ~ond our control. ~ner to car~ fire, tornado and other necessa~ insurance. Note: This pro~sal may be ~
w~thdrawn by us if not accepted within~
Date of Acceptance:
Signature
. days.