1989-11-14CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1989
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 24, 1989, REGULAR
MEETING. Pg'
CASE ~89-847:
MOUND HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, 2020 COMMERCE BLVD.
BLOCKS 1, 2, & 4, MISC. LOTS,
LAKESIDE PARK A.L.CROCKER'S,
PID #13-117-24 32 0030.
RE_~EST: FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE.
RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CASE #89-844, SCOT A.
MC KENZIE - FENCE VARIANCE.
3440-3447
DISCUSSION:
pg. 3448-3457
pg. 3458-3460
RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION
ON HOUSING MAINTENANCE/TRUTH IN
HOUSING. Pg'
APPROVAL OF COMMONS DOCK MAP FOR 1990.
will be distributed Tuesday evening.)
(Materials
REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL ON FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE FOR DREDGING PROJECT - DOUG DION,
4937 BARTLETT BLVD.
8. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
Pg.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROJECT NO. 8926 (STOP LIGHT AT COMMERCE BLVD.
& LYNWOOD BLVD).
10.
11.
12.
RESOLUTION APPROVINg T~E PRQPOSED 1990 TAX LEVY· Pg.
LICENSE RENEWALS
APPROVAL OF PROCEDURES TO ADMINISTER T}~E MINNESOTA
pOVERNMEN~. D%TA FRAC~IqES ACT Pg-
WArRaNT OF ~I~L~. Pg'
/14· INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS:
Department Head monthly reports for
October, 1989.
3461
3462-3464
3465-3467
3468-3471
3472-3489
3490-3507
pg. 3508-3526
Page 3438
Be
Co
De
Ee
Fe
Go
Ke
L.M.C.D. Representative monthly report
for October, 1989.
Pg.
3527-3528
Letter dated October 30, 1989, from Ruth Franklin,
representative from District F of the Regional
Transit Board (RTC). Pg-
3529
Planning Commission Minutes of
October 23, 1989.
Pg. 3530-3536
Economic Development Commission Minutes of
May 17, 1989, June 13, 1989, July 6, 1989,
July 27, 1989, September 13, 1989,
October 3, 1989, and October 26, .1989.
Pg. 3537-3547
REMINDER:
Planning Commission interviews will be held on
Monday, November 13, 1989, 7:00 P.M., at City
Hall. Planning Commission and City Council will
jointly interview candidates. You have received
a mailing on the applicants. Please bring the
resumes with you and be prepared to ask
questions. Pg. 3548
REMINDER:
Economic Development Commission (EDC) interviews
will be held at 7:00 P.M. prior to the
November 14, 1989, City Council Meeting, jointly
with EDC, at City Hall. Enclosed are the letters
and/or resumes. Carolyn Rosdahl has indicated
she has a schedule conflict for 11-14-89. If you
wish, the Council and EDC can select another date
which is convenient. She indicated that if the
EDC and Council wanted to select one of the other
applicants, that would be fine with her also. I
told her I would get back to her with what the
EDC and Council want to do.
Pg. 3549-3551
REMINDER:
Committee of the Whole Meeting, Tuesday,
November 21, 1989, immediately following tree
lighting ceremony downtown. Mayor Smith will
"flip the switch" at 6:30 P.M. There is an
short musical program following that. We should
be able to begin the meeting by 7:30 P.M.
City of Mound Christmas Party, Mound VFW, Saturday,
December 2, 1989, 8:00 P.M. to Midnight. Pg. 3552
REMINDER:
LMCD Meeting on~the~e~~Management
Plan, SaturdaDy~~mber '2, 1989_~U.:30 A.M. to
4:15 P.M., Lafayette C--~. Th~s will be a
preview of the technical management plan.
LMCD MAILING
Pg. 3553
Page 3439
169
October 24, 1989
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 24, 1989
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, October 24, 1989, following the Board
of Review, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said
City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ah-
rens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present
were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark,
Attorney Curt Pearson, City Planner Mark Koegler and the follow-
ing interested citizens: Bryan Clem, Brian Johnson, Jack & Kay
Ostvig, Doug & Donna Easthouse, Larry Wagner, Myrt & Skip Blank,
Mrs. Robert Lyckholm, David Zawada, Bonnie Engle, Todd Gray,
Duane Barth, Bruce McComb, Marcy Lemmon, and Scot McKenzie
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten-
dance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
MINUTES
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to approve the
minutes of the October 10, 1989, Regular Meeting and the Oc-
tober 19, 1989, Committee of the Whole Meeting, as sub-
mitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was
$2,989.90. The Mayor opened the Public Hearing. James Anderson,
4781 Aberdeen Road asked if he could make arrangements to pay his
outstanding $148.32 utility bill. The Council instructed him to
contact Finance Director John Norman tomorrow morning. The Mayor
closed the Public Hearing.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 89-133
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,841.58
AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF
WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION #87-182 FOR MR. & MRS. ROLAND
MC ALLISTER
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
170
October 24, 1989
RESOLUTION #89-134 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF
RESOLUTION #87-182 FOR ONE YEAR
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE ~89-844:
SCOT MC KENZIE, 4861 HANOVER ROAD, LOTS 6 & 15,
BLOCK 16, DEVON, PID ~25-117-24 11 0061/0062,
FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE
The City Planner explained the request. He stated that the fence
in some places is as high as 92 to 101 inches from the adjoining
grade. The allowable height is 72 inches, except when a fence is
placed on top of a retaining wall then the maximum height is 42".
The Planning Commission is working on changes in the fence or-
dinance. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the
request because they felt there was a lack of hardship.
Mr. McKenzie was present and stated he wants the high fence due
to the appearance of his neighbors yard.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to direct the City
Attorney to prepare a resolution of denial for the fence
height variance, 4861 Hanover Road, Lots 6 & 15, Block 16,
Devon, PID %25-117-24 11 0061/0065 and bring back to the
next Council Meeting. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
CASE ~89-845:
BRUCE MC COMB, 3005 BRIGHTON BLVD. HOUSE MOVING -
TO 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD, NORTH 101' OF LOT 38 & W
1/2 OF LOT 39, BLOCK 10, PEMBROKE, PID ~19-117-23
33 0195
The City Planner explained the request. The Planning Commission
recommended approval subject to alterations, replacements and
repairs being made to the structure prior to relocation. They
also recommended requiring a bond at 125% of the proposed
finished value of the house to ensure completion of the project.
Mr. McComb was present and explained his proposal to the Council.
The Council discussed the procedures involved in moving a house.
The ordinance is vague and does not set out a policy on how these
issues should be handled. They discussed notification of all
persons within 350 feet of the proposed site where the house is
to be moved and decided that those people should be notified
also.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to table this
issue until the November 28, 1989, Council Meeting and refer
the item back to the Planning Commission for a public hear-
ing and notify all the property owners within 350 feet of
the proposed site where the house would be moved. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
171
October 24, 1989
REQUEST TO BUILD DECK AND STAIRWAY WITHIN A SCENIC EASEMENT, 2920
HIGHLAND COURTt FOR CREATIVE DEVELOPERS (DUANE BARTH)
The City Planner explained the request. The Planning Commission
recommended approval upon the condition that an erosion control
measure, acceptable to the City, be placed under the deck.
Mr. Barth, developer and Mr. Gray owner of the property were
present and agreed with the Planning Commission recommendation.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %89-135
RESOLUTION TO ALLOW BUILDING A DECK
WITHIN A SCENIC EASEMENT AS PER EXHIBIT
A, PROVIDED THAT AN EROSION CONTROL
MEASURE, ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY, BE
PLACED UNDER THE DECK, 2920 HIGHLAND
COURT, LOT 2, BLOCK 1, COBBLESTONE COVE,
PID %23-117-24 41 0028
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
UPDATE FROM CITY ATTORNEY ON MELVIN ZUCKMAN CASE
The City Attorney suggested that the Council defer this item for
one month, until the November 28, 1989, Council Meeting.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
Matthew Phillippi, owner of property at 4519 Manchester Road
stated he has a problem with a driveway easement. The Council
suggested he contact Building Official, Jan Bertrand and work
with her.
CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATING COMMONS DOCKS AT AVALON PARK
The City Clerk explained the background. The following persons
spoke with regard to the issue: Kay & Jim Ostvig, Brian Johnson,
Doug Easthouse, Cliff Schmidt, Bryan Clem, Mrs. Robert Lyckholm,
Dave Zawada.
The Council discussed holding a public hearing on the Avalon Park
dockage issue.
The City Attorney explained that the Dock ordinance provides for
the Park Commission to review the dock location map between July
1 and December 1 before each new boating season so their recom-
mended changes may be referred to and considered by the City
Council on or before January 15. The City Manager stated the
Park Commission will be reviewing the dock location map at their
November 9th meeting.
172
October 24, 1989
The Council asked the newspapers to publicize the Park Commission
Meeting on November 9th alerting all residents of the review of
the dock location map to gain input from people for and against
docks in park areas.
RESOLUTION TO APPOINT RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY FOR TW~ MINNESOT~
DATA PRACTICES ACT
The City Attorney explained that this resolution is to comply
with the State Law regarding the Data Practices Act. It appoints
Edward J. Shukle, Jr. as the Responsible Authority and Designees
Francene C. Clark and Leonard Harrell. In the next few weeks he
will be bringing the procedures to follow for the Council to
review.
Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #99-135
RESOLUTION TO APPOINT RESPONSIBLE
AUTHORITY FOR THE MINNESOTA DATA PRAC-
TICES ACT
The vote was unanimously in favor.
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ZONE ON PART OF EAST SIDE OF DICKENA
The City Manager explained that a resident has expressed a safety
concern about having a parked car on the east side of Dickens
Lane when traveling north up the hill and not being able to see
if there is oncoming traffic before the crest of the hill. The
Police Dept. and Public Works have reviewed the situation and
recommend that there be no parking on the east side of Dickens
Lane from the NSP pole south of 2900 Dickens Lane to the rock in
front of 2930 Dickens Lane.
Ahrens moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-137 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NO PARKING ZONE
ON PART OF EAST SIDE OF DICKENS LANE
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PRESENTATION OF 1990 BUDGET AND DAT~
FOR THE RECONVENING OF BUDGET HEARING
MOTION made by Johnson seconded by Jensen to set the
Tuesday, November 28, 1989, at 7:30 P.M. for the Budget
Hearing and Tuesday, December 5, 1989, at 7:30 P.M. for the
Reconvened public hearing on tho 1990 budget. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
173
October 24, 1989
PETITION FROM MRS. SANDY BASTIEN, 2541 LAKEWOOD LANE
SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION
The City Manager explained that when the property at 2541
Lakewood Lane was connected to the sanitary sewer there were two
lots and the home at 2541 Lakewood Lane was connected to the
wrong connection. A new home has now been built on the vacant
lot and it is necessary for this home to be connected to the
service which is currently being utilized by the property at 2541
Lakewood Lane. The property owner has agreed to correct this
error by connecting to the proper sewer service connection, but
wishes to have the cost assessed to her property over the next
ten years at 8% interest. The property owner has executed a
petition for local improvement, has signed an agreement to
special assessments, and has executed a temporary construction
easement. The estimated cost of this project is not to exceed
$2,000.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %89-138 RESOLUTION OF AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT
AND WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL -
Z541 LAKEWOOD LANE - CONNECTION TO
SANITARY SEWER
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED POLICY ON APPOINTMENTS TO THE CITY'S
PLANNING, PARKS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS
The Council discussed the proposed policy on appointments and/or
reappointments to the Planning Commission, Park Commission and
the Economic Development Commission. The proposed policy is as
follows:
"The City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby
establishes the following policy:
Definitions of "Vacancy": A vacancy occurs when a term
expires and the commissioner holding that term does not desire
reappointment. A vacancy also occurs when a commissioner resigns
his/her position prior to the term expiring.
When a vacancy occurs, the City Manager is directed to
advertise in the City's official newspaper that there
are positions to be filled on a commission(s). Such
advertising shall be done in the form of a "news
release".
Such news release shall include, but not be limited to,
the number of vacancies, the length of the term, or
request for letter of interest and/or resume,
application deadline date, etc. The news release shall
174
October 24, 1989
also state that prospective applicants will be required
to interview with the City Council and respective
commission jointly. Such interviews will be conducted
as soon as possible following the application deadline.
Each commission will formally recommend appointments
following the joint interviews. The City Council will
review those recommendations and will be responsible
for making the appointments.
Current commission members who wish to be reappointed
must indicate such and the reasons'for being
reappointed in writing a minimum of sixty (60) days
prior to their term expiring.
If a member resigns during his/her term, such
resignation must be in writing and submitted to the
City Manager.
®
In the case of member resigning with less than ninety
(90) days remaining on his/her term, the City Council,
at its discretion, may delay filling the vacancy until
the term officially expires."
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #89-139 RESOLUTION APPROVING A POLICY ON
APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO
ADVISORY COMMISSIONS
The vote was three in favor with Ahrens and Smith voting nay.
Motion carried.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 255:05 AND 260:10 RELATING To
OUALIFICATIONS FOR PARK ADVISORY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSIONS
Since the above policy was approved ordinance sections 255:05 and
260:10 need to be amended to reflect the change in policy.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following ordinance:
ORDINANCE #36-1989
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 255:05
AND 260:10 RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS
FOR PARK ADVISORY AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS
The vote was three in favor with Ahrens and Smith voting nay.
Motion carried.
175
October 24, 1989
PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount
of $130,274.54, when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CBD SNOW REMOVAL BID
The City Manager explained that only one bid was received from
Widmer Bros. for the Central Business District snow removal for
1989-90. It is the same amount as the 1988-89 bid, as follows:
Rubber Loader Model 66 Kawasaki (4 yd.)
2 - 950 Cat (3 yd.)
Road Patrol Model 14 Cat Blade
2 - T Dump Trucks with Plow & Sander
Pickups with Plows
Dump Trucks
Bobcat
Salt-Sand Mixture
78.00/hr.
72.00/hr.
60.O0/hr.
48.00/hr.
44.00/hr.
45.00/hr.
58.00/hr.
35.00/yd.
Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution
RESOLUTION #89-140
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND AWARDING THE
BID FOR 1989-90 CBD SNOW REMOVAL TO
WIDMER BROS.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS:
ae
Financial Report for September as prepared by John Norman,
Finance Director.
B. L.M.C.D. Mailings.
C. Planning Commission Minutes of October 9, 1989.
D. Park Commission Minutes of October 12, 1989.
Ze
AMM Legislative Policy Adoption Meeting to be held Thursday,
November 2, 1989, 5:45 P.M., at the Minneapolis Metrodome
Hilton.
Fe
League of Minnesota Cities Policy Adoption Meeting to be
held Thursday, November 16, 1989, 8:00 A.M., at Hotel
Sofitel, Bloomington.
176
October 24, 1989
Go
Invitation from the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
Resources to attend a conference focusing on the future of
the environmental trust fund entitled, "Natural Resource
Congress". This will be held Saturday, October 28, 1989,
10:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M., State Office Building, St. Paul.
There is no charge.
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at
~0:40 P.M. The vote vas unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
Case No. 89-847
RESOLUTION #89-
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING CONHISSION TO ALLOW
A FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR
2020 CONNERCE BLVD.
(P&Z CASE NO. 89-847)
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a
six foot high fence to be erected within the required 30 foot
setback along Balsam Road fop Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 1,
Lots 22 and 23, Block 2, and that part of lots 24, 25, and 26,
Block 2 lying north of street as opened and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
and north 10 feet of Lot 9, Block 4, including adjacent ! & 2 of
Crocker Avenue and of Shady Lane vacated, Block 1, 2, and 4, ex-
cept highway, Lakeside Park A. L. Crocker's, PID #13-11'1-24-32
0030, 2020 Commerce Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-3
Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code
requires a 30 foot setback from the street for a six foot high
fence;
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that al-
terations m~y be made to a building containing a lawful, noncon-
forming residential property when the alterations will improve
the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the
number of units, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request
and does recommend approval to improve security for a multiple
family senior housing unit with a history of vandalism, and since
Balsam Road is not a main thoroughfare, the fence setback at 30
feet would be in the middle of the parking )pt, and the density
of cars in the parking lot;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
The City does hereby authorize the two foot fence height
variance to extend a Fence within the required 30 foot set-
back for the property located at 2020 Commerce Blvd.,
legally described as Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 1, Lots
22 and 23, Block 2, and that part of lots 24, 25, and 26,
Block 2 lying north of street as opened and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7,
8, and north I0 feet of Lot 9, Block 4, including adjacent l
& 2 of Crocker Avenue and of Shady Lane vacated, Block 1, 2,
and 4, except highway, Lakeside Park A. L. Crocker's, PID
#13-117-24-32 0030.
PROPOSED RESOLUTI. ON
Page Two
CASE NO. 89-847
e
The City Council authorizes the the alterations set forth
below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the
clear and express understanding that the use remains as a
lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions
and restrictions of Section 23.404.
It is determined that the iivabil ity of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the fol-
lowing alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to
ensure security and afford the owner reasonable use of his
land.
To construct a six foot high fence approximately five
feet From Balsam Road, as shown on Exhibit A.
Upon the following conditions:
1)
The Fence is to be constructed of material that is
see-through, such as chain link, to alleviate a
possible visibility problem when entering the
public right-of-way.
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property:
Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 1, Lots 22 and 23,
Block 2, and that part of lots 24, 25, and 26,
Block 2 lying north of street as opened and Lots 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, and north 10 feet of Lot 9, Block 4,
including adjacent I & 2 of Crocker Avenue and of
Shady Lane vacated, Block l, 2, and 4, except high-
way, Lakeside Park A. L. Crocker's, PID #13-117-24-
32 0030.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Min-
nesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (Il. This
shall be considered a restriction on how this property may
be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs
For such recording. The building permit shall not be issued
until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk.
e'eelleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~, '
IIIII
limB
I
I
I-
l
·
I
· ·
I
Exhibit A
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
October 23, 1989
Ce
Case No. 89-847: Mound Housinq & Redevelopment Authority~
2020 Commerce Blvd., Blocks !, 2, & 4, Misc. Lotst Lakeside
Park A.L. Crocker's,__PID #13-117-24-32 0030.
VARIANCE.
FENCE HFIGHT
Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the request For a two
foot fence height variance and explained the location of the
proposed fence. 5he noted that the Police department has had 8
falls to the site (two of which had more than one victim) within
the last two years.
Staff recommended approval of the requested Fence height variance
upon the condition that the fence remain an open type (see-
through) to alleviate a possible visibility problem when entering
the public right-of-way.
Sandi Woytcke commented that they have had vandalism in the park-
ing lot, such as: cars being scratched with keys, tires stolen,
a Volkswagon being picked-up and moved, potatoes in exhaust
pipes, etc.
The Commission discussed reasons why this Fence height should be
allowed, and reviewed possible alternatives.
MOTION made by Meyer, seconded by Thai, to approve staff
recommendation For approval of the Fence height variance
For the following reasons: to Improve security for a
multi Family senior housing unit with a history of van-
da lism, the street side Fence is not on a main thorough-
Fare, the fence would be in the middle of the parking
lot if placed at the required setback, a chain link
Fence will be erected opposed to a privacy fence, and
the density of cars in the parking lot. Motion carried
unanimously.
This case will De heard by the City Council on November 14, 1989.
(;IT ()I' Nl)
CASE NO. 89-847
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official z~
DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of October 23, I989
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
89-847
Mound Housing & Redevelopment A6thority
LOCATION: 2020 Commerce Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Block 1, 2, & 4, Misc. Lots, La~Xeside Park
A.L. Crocker's, PID #13-117-24-32 0030
SUBJECT: Fence Height Variance
EXISTING ZONING: R-3 Two Family Residential
PROPOSAL: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority is requesting
a variance to the height limitation in the Front yard (side
street) setback. They are asking for a two Foot height variance
to allow a six Foot vinyl coated chain link security fence.
The HRA has reported vandalism to the Police Department of the
equipment parked and stored on their property. It is their
opinion that a higher fence would deter unauthorized entry onto
the property. The tenants residing in the building are elderly.
The HRA Feel they need to make an extra effort to afford a secure
environment For the senior citizens going to and from the build-
ing. I have attached a report From the Police Department dis-
cussing the security issue.
The Fencing ordinance in Section 23.415 limits the height of
fencing in the 30 foot front yard setback area to 48 inches. The
required setback would dissect through the improved parking lot.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested fence
height variance upon the condition that the fence remain an open
type (see-through) to alleviate a possible visibility problem
when entering the public right-of-way.
The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be
referred to the City Council on November 14, 1989.
CITY OF HOUND
PART I I Case No. 89-847
Fee $50.00
VARIANCE APPLICATION
PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION
(Please type or print the f=ollowlng inf=ormation.)
Address of= Subject Proper~t.y~FJ~(_)
Lots 23, 24, 25, & 26 of ~mocK1;. Lots
Lot Lots 22, 23 & p/24, 25 26 of Block 2.
4,5,6,7,8 & p/10 Block 4;-
Block
Addition Lakeside Park Crocker's INDIAN KNOLL
Owner's NameMound.,.Housin9 & Redevelopment Auth.
1&2
PIP No. 13-117-24-32 0030
Day Phone 472-5078
Owner's Address
App) i cant' s Name ( t f other than owner)~~CFTti34r)
Existing Use of Property.- Senior Housing
Zoning District R ~
Has an application ever been made f=or zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or other zoning procedure Eot this oroperty? yes /~. If= yes,
list date(s) of= application, action taken, and provide res°lut~on number(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
I certif=y that all of= the above statements and the statements contained in
any required 'papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized of Eicia) of= the City of= Mound Eot the purpose
of= inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may
be required by law.
Applicant's Slgnature~ Date
11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Planning Commission Recommendation
Date
Council Action:
Resolution No.
Date
~RIANCE APPLICATION
Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for
the zoning district in which it is loc~)teci? -Y~No ~. It= no,
~ + ~ ! w ~, ,
specify each non-conforming use~ ,~:/ ,., ~/~ ~.-,:~£~-,, ' , . ' ~ x .'
~. ~ ~ , ~' .'~.-'~ x ~ ~ ,.. . , ,
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes (~, No ( ). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
.
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted In that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography (
( ) too small ( )dratnage (
( ) t~ shal low ( ) shape (
) soil
) sub-surface
) other: specify
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone
having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes ( ), No (~d). If yes, explain
Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the
re)ocation of a road? Yes ( ), No /~. If yes, explain
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Are the conditions oF hardship For which you request a variance
pecultar.~ only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ),
No ~)..~, IF no, how many other properties are similarly affected?...
What is the "minimum" modification (variance) From the area, bulk, and
setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of
your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and writ-
ten explanation.
,
Wtll granttng dE the variance be ~terially Oetrimental to property In
the same zone, or to the enforcement o~ this ordinance?
PART III
SITE PLAN INFORMATION= All supporting docUments such as sketch plans,
attachments~ etc.~ must be submitted tn 8-1/2"xlI" size· If larger
drawtn~s are submitted? one must be 8-1/2"x11", and 15 larger size
copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show-
lng the Following information:
Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s), drlveway(s)/street access, off-street parking, and
utilities.
Existing and proposed elevations.
Distance between: building and Front, s!de and rear lot linesl
principal building and accessory buildings; principal building
and principal buildings on adjacent lots·
Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
Indicate "north" compass direction.
Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the
city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
CEI L~ ~
A. THOMAS WURST, P.A.
CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A,
dAMES D. I--ARSON, P.A.
THOMAS F'. UNDERWOOD, P.A.
CRAIG ~1. ~V~ERTZ
ROG, Em d. F'Et-LOWS
LAW OFFICF..S
WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & M£RTZ
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING SaROIrlES~iIONAL- A$$OClATION~*
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
November 7, 1989
?~L[PHON£
(6~2) 338-::'625
NOV 8 ]989
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Resolution of Denial - Fence Variance
Dear Ed:
At the meeting on October 24, 1989, I was directed to prepare
a Resolution of Denial on a request by Scot A. McKenzie for
a variance. The proposed resolution is enclosed, and if you
and Jan find this in order, it can be included in the packet
for the next Council meeting, ou_rs,//~j//
C is ^ Pearson
City Attorney
CAP:Ih
Enclosure
RESOLUTION NO. l~/
A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST OF SCOT A. MCKENZIE
FOR A FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE AT 4861 HANOVER LANE (CASE
NO. 89-844)
WHEREAS, Section 23.415 of the Mound Code of Ordinances
establishes maximum height limitations for fences in residential and
commercial zoning districts, and
WHEREAS, rear and side yard fences in residential districts may be
solid or open but may not exceed 72 inches in height, and
WHEREAS, Scot A. McKenzie received a building permit on June 24,
1988, to construct a 72 inch high alternating board fence along the back and
side of his property, and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector inspected the work on August 2,
1989, and found the fence height along the side yard was between 92 inches
and 101 inches, and the applicant had put a six foot high alternating board
fence on top of a retaining wall, and
WHEREAS, Section 23.415, Subd. 4, Subsection 4(d), provides that
fence heights shall be measured from the adjoining natural ground except
that fences constructed on top of retaining walls shall be limited to a
maximum of 42 inches in residential zones, and
WHEREAS, Scot A. McKenzie filed an application for a variance to
the fence height limitation which request was presented to the Mound
Planning Commission on October 9, 1989, and after consideration the
Planning Commission recommended to the Mound City Council to deny the fence
height variance since there was no hardship and no special circumstances
which differentiate this request for a fence height variance from other
situations in the City, and
WHEREAS, the matter came before the Mound City Council on October
24, 1989, and Scot A. McKenzie indicated that he thought that fences should
be allowed up to 8 feet, but he did not present any evidence to indicate why
his request for a variance should be granted under the criteria established
in Section 23.501.1 of the Mound Code of Ordinances,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MOUND CITY COUNCIL AS
FOLLOWS: ~-
1. The application of Scot A. McKenzie for a variance to the fence
height limitation for property at 4861 Hanover Road is hereby denied for the
following reasons:
a. It is indisputable that the ordinance limits fence
heights to 72 inches and the current height of the fence is 92
inches to 100 inches in height.
b. Criteria established for granting variances as set
forth in Section 23.501.1 of the Mound Code of Ordinances requires
that exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply and that
there be circumstances over which the owner of the property has no
control, or that there are conditions or circumstances which do not
result from the actions of the applicant. In this case, there is
no evidence of exceptional circumstances or special standards or
circumstances that do not result from the actions of the applicant,
since he voluntarily constructed this fence in violation of the
Code of Ordinances.
c. The Council finds that the granting of the variance
would confer on the applicant special privileges that are denied by
the Code of Ordinances to other owners of land in the same
residential use district.
2. The granting of the variance would be detrimental to the public
welfare and injurious to other properties in the area, since no hardship has
been shown on the owner of this property other than economic to justify the
issuance of the variance.
3. The Council hereby finds that no showing was made that a
hardship exists that the property owner cannot rectify, and that he can
correct the problem and bring his fence height into compliance with the
ordinance and continue to use his property in a manner which is consistent
with the zoning ordinance criteria for all other property in the same use
district.
4. The Council further finds that if general standards and
requirements are waived or relaxed for one property owner, other property
owners have the right to expect the same type of treatment or their
constitutional rights would be adversely affected by failing to apply the
equal protection rules of the constitution for all citizens.
()f XI()/'NI)
HEHORANDUH
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Noven~Der 13. 1989
Mound City Council
Mound Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission
Housing Maintenance/Truth in Housing
Following a joint meeting of the Council and Commission, the Planning Commis-
sion conducted a Public Hearing regarding the need For, and interest in an or-
ganized method of addressing problems with housing maintenance. We asked
those present to help determine if there was a problem, what that problem
might be, and methods of correcting said problem.
Based on the public hearing, joint meeting with the City Council, and other
issues addressed by the Planning Commission and the City Council, we have
reached the following conclusions:
We as a community need to do something regarding the external appearance,
maintenance, and safety of some properties in the City of Mound.
Rental properties are a bigger problem than owner occupied properties.
In no case should a resident or property owner's rights be violated by
such things as unjustified entry.
Those attenQing future public hearings on this issue would like to have a
document to review before the meeting.
We need a way to advise potential purchasers about such things as zoning
restrictions, zoning non-conformities, and water Dill balances.
Therefore, the Mound Advisory Planning and Zoning Commission hereby requests
the Mound City Council to direct staff to work with the Planning Commission to
draft an ordinance that contains the following requirements:
For all residential p_roperties sold in Mound:
- inspection prior to or at the time of sale
- payment of a fee to cover the cost of the inspection
- identification of housing, zoning, or other code deficiencies
- correction of certain deficiencies as described in the document
draft dated April 1988.
For all multi~le family residences and rental property in Mound:
- periodic inspections of common areas and building exteriors (e.g.
annually for apartments, every 3 years for duplexes, every 5 years
for single family rentals)
- payment of a fee to cover the cost of the inspection
- correction of housing and fire code deficiencies, anQ other
deficiencies as described in the document Qraft dated April 1988.
We wilt work closely with the staff to insure the protection of the rights of
the citizens of Mound while promoting and improving the image of our great
city.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering Division
320 Washington Ave. South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468
Phone: [6 '12] 935-338 '1
November 2, 1989
NOV
6 1989
Mr. Ed Shukle
City Manager
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota, 55364
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
CSAH 110 AT CSAH 15 NORTH JUNCTION
COUNTY PROJECT 8926
Dear Mr. Shukle:
Submitted herewith is one set of plans and a sample
copy of a resolution approving plans for the above
referenced traffic signal project for which
arrangements are being made to call for bids.
Please present these plans to your city council for
approval. A resolution approving plans must be
passed by your city council prior to receipt of
bids.
If you have any questions, please call me at
935-3381, extension 229.
Sincerely,
Dharam C. Bobra, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
OCB:mak
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, the
following resolution was moved and adopted:
RESOLUTZON
WHEREAS, Plans for Henneptn County Project No. 8926 showing proposed traffic
control signal installation at the intersection o¢ County State Aid Highway No. 110
and County State Aid Highway 15 North 3unction within the limits o¢ the City, have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved and
that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street
parking on those portions of said Project No. 8926 within its corporate limits.
Dated this day of , 1989.
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota )
County of Hennepin ) ss.
City of Mound )
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a.
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Hound at a meeting thereof
held in the City of Mound, Minnesota, on the day of
, i989, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession.
(SEAL)
City Clerk
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Twin Cities St. Cloud
15050 23rd Ave. N,
Plymouth, MN
55447
Telephone
612/476-6010
Facsimile
612/476-8532
November 8, 1989
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
NOV
9 t989
SUBJECT:
Traffic Signals
County Road 110 and County Road 15
MFRA #8932
Dear Ed:
As requested, we have reviewed the plans prepared by Hennepin County for
the above proposed traffic signals. We recommend approval as submitted.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
us.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK R00S ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
JC:jmj
An Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
November 9, 1989
· o: Yo,, czTy cotrNcI,. /-'
I~ROH: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
RE: NOVEMBI~ I~TH PROPOSED LBVY CERTIFICATION
Attached is a resolution to the Hennepin County Auditor detailing the
proposed levy by November 15th as required by the new tax bill. The tax
bill was passed on September 29, 1989. It dictated a revised schedule as
it relates to Truth in Taxation Compliance for Payable 1990. The schedule
is as follows:
November 15, 1989 - Last day for City to certify its PROPOSED tax levy.
November 15 -
December 28, 1989
- City holds public hearings on proposed 1990 tax levy
and budget.
December 28, 1989 - Last day for the City to certify its FINAL tax levy
Please note that the attached resolution represents a proposed levy. This
is the maximum the City of Hound would be alloyed to levy under the new tax
law. On Tuesday, November 14th, you viii be asked to approve this proposed
levy. During the Budget Hearings scheduled for November 28th and December
5th you viii discuss the maximum levy and you viii have the opportunity to
make changes in it. The tax law states that the final levy, which has to
be made by December 28, 1989, cannot exceed the November 15th proposed
levy.
The proposed 1990 City levy of $1,583,795 compares with the 1989 City levy
of $1,327,245, an increase of $256,550 or 19.3%. This is due to the fact
that the legislature in its special session held in late September, shifted
884,000,000 of Local Government Aid (LGA) from cities to school districts.
The ability to make up that difference was allowed through an increase in
the tax levy. The following gives you an idea of how the tax law affected
the City of Hound in terms of its tax levy and LGA:
Ar' equal opportumty Employer that does not d~scr~minate on the basis of race, color, national orLq,~ or hanC,~capped status
In the admission or access to or treatment or employment in, its programs ant ac',,v:hes
>>> TAX LEF~
CERT. TAI( LEVY PER NEW TAX BILL PASSED AT SPECIAL SESSION
PREY. LEVY (AMOUNT CERTIFIED UNDER 1989 VETOED TAX BILL)
$1,404,187
- $1,125,636
LEVY INCREASE - A 24.8% INCREASE IN TAX LEVY DOLLARS
278,551
>>> L G A <<<
'ER s , ciAL s, .ss oN Mw Mw
6659,792
- $385,819
LGA REDUCTION - A 41.5% REDUCTION
$273,973
In conclusion, Governor Rudy Perpich and the 1989 Minnesota Legislature
took some significant action with regard to the tax laws for the State. In
all of my years in local government, I have not seen such peculiar actions
taken by a governor or a legislature. In the recent past, school districts
have been attacked by the governor and legislature. Now it appears that
the cities are under the closest scrutiny. This whole process has been a
nightmare and I am not sure that there are better things to come with
regard to state tax laws in the near future.
I want to emphasize again that the governor and the legislature are to
blame for the situation that we are dealing with as we approach 1990.
Local governments have consistently over the years been accountable to
their citizenry. The legislature and the governor consistently contend
that local governments are "big spenders". This statement is far from the
truth.
November 14, 1989
I¢
RESOLUTION APPROVINO THE PROPOSED 1990 TAX LEVY AT $1,583,795
BE IT RESOLTED, that the City Council off the City
Minnesota, does hereby direct the Hennepin County Auditor to
follow£ng taxes for collection in 1990:
of Hound,
levy the
SPECIAL LEVIES
Bonded Indebtedness
Unfunded Accrued Liability
Public Pension Funds
146,510
33,098
TOTAL SPECIAL LEVIES
Total Levy Limitation 1989/1990
179,608
1.404.187
1,583,795
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAMING
GAMBLING CONTROL DIVISION
Mail Station 3315
St. Paul, MN ,55146-3315
612/297-5300
GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION
INSTRUCTIONS
A. Type or print in ink.
FOR BOARD USE ONLY
lLicense Number
PAID
AMT
CHECK #
DATE
Take completed application to local governing body. obtain signature and date on all copies, and leave 1 copy. Applicant keeps 1
copy and sends original to the above address with a check.
Incomplete applications may be returned.
Enclose license fee with application.
Type of Application:
'J~ Class A -- Fee $200.00 (Bingo, Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Puli-Tabs)
[] Class B -- Fee $125.00 (Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull-tabs)
D Class C -- Fee $100.00 (Bingo only)
El Class D -- Fee $75.00 (Raffles only)
Make checks payable to: i
Commissioner of Revenue
I
Check one: ~1[ lA. Organization has never been licensed. [] 1B. New site -- Give base license number
[] 1C. Renewal of existing license -- Give complete license number.
[] 1D. Change in class of an existing license -- Give complete license number. ~-'~' [ ]-
r~ Yes ~ No 2. Has organization ever received a Lawful Gambling Exemption Permit from the Board?
If yes, give complete
permit number J J
Yes '1~ No 3. Have Internal Controls been submitted previously on a form provided by the Board? If no, please attach copy.
Applicar3t (Official, legal name of organization) 15 Business Address of Organization
~,,~-.~ -' ~, ~-,~'~ ~,,~ol //,.,,., ,,.~ ~,~..) /;~ .... -~,.., 2,..1t/ (~. ,..,.',,,~
~ 17 County ,18. Business Phone Number
City, State, Zip /~ t /~N ~, .~ ~ ¥
Type of organization: []Fraternal •Veterans •Religious z~ther nonprofit
Yes'~ No 10. Is organization incorporated as a nonprofit organization? If yes, give number assigned to Articles or page and
book number: [ 1 Attach copy of certificate.
Yes '~,No 1 1. Are articles filed with the Secretary of State?
Yes ID No 12. Is organization exempt from Minnesota or Federal income tax? If yes, please a,.ttach letter from IRS or
Department of Revenue declaring exemption. ~..~, .5¢ ¢ ~'P~ t/, ~ ~.,~ ~:
Yes ~No 13. Has license ever been denied, suspended or revoked? If yes, check all that apply:
[] Denied [] Suspended r3 Revoked Give date:
4. Number of active members 115. Number of years in existence Note: Attach evidence 'of
~ ~ O I ~ ~'' ¢ C ]' 5 ~"? three years existe, nce.
16.
Name of Chief Executive Officer (Cannot be
Gambling Manage~
Title
Business Phone Number
Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted
City, State, Zip
17. Name of treasurer or person who accounts for other
revenues of the organization (Cannot be Gambling Manager)
Title
Business Phone Number
19. Street address (not P.O. Box Number)
21. County (where gambling premises is located)
CG-OO01-03 (7/89)
White Copy-Board
Canary-Applicant
Page 1 of 2
Pink-Local Governing Body
· Gambling License Appl. ic, ation
Type of Application: ~I Class A
Class B n Class C E] Class D
Yes El No
1~ Yes ~ No
,Yes[3 No
22. Is gambling premises located within city limits?
23. Are all gambling activities conducted at the premises listed in #18 of this application? If not, complete a separate
application for each premises (except raffles) as a separate license is required for each premises.
24. Does organization own the gambling premises? If no, attach copy of the lease with terms of at least one year,
and attach a sketch of the premises indicating what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch are not require~
for Class D applications.
25.ISAm°untM°nth or°fBingoRent OccasionPer I ] 26. Do~j./~, *:/~ 7DaYY°U plan on.. conducting~;....~ * / )/'mTimebing° withDay this license? If yes,TimegiVe daySDayand times of bingo Time°CCasi°ns*
[3 Yea [3 No
28. Insurance Company Name (not agency name)
27. Has the $10,000 fidelity bond required by Minnesota Statutes 34920 been obtained?
30. Lessor Name i~,./~ 131. Address
33. Gam_.~bling Manager Na,me 134. Address
~-,...,,~ ~.,~,~,,.,I I ~3.~' ?.,-,.,,,,r,e :~'~
36. Ga~ino ManaGer Business Phone 137. Date oamblinG manager ~came
( ~/1 ) q72 - /~ ~ I mem~r of organization:
O Y~ D ~ 38. Has the license termination form ~en complete? A~ach copy.
CI Yes 13 No
40. List the day and time of the regular meetin~l of the organization. Day
41. Bank Name 142. Bank Address __
GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION
29. Bond Number
32. City, State, Zip
35. City, State, Zip
I Month Year ! ?~-' I
39. Has the compensation schedule been approved by the organization? Attach copy.
Time
43. Bank Account Number
By my signature below, local law enforcement officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site at any
time gambling is being conducted to observe the gambling and to enforce the law for any unauthorized game or practice.
BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION
By my signature below, the Board is hereby authorized to inspect the bank records of the gambling bank account whenever
necessary to fulfill requirements of current gambling rules pnd law.
I hereby declare that: OATH
1. I have read this application and all information submitted to the Board;
2. All information submitted is true, accurate and complete;
3. All other required information has been fully disclosed;
4. I am the chief executive officer of the organization;
5. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted;
6. I will familiarize myself with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree, if
licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments thereto;
7. Membership list of the organization will be available within seven days after it is requested by the board.
44. Official, Legal Name 0.J[/Orga~zefiot~, ' _
,, 14s. Signature,t~ustbe sig~ Chief Executive Officer)
Title of Signer'?F¢$/-' r Date /
/ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY
I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this application. By acknowledging receipt, I admit having been served with notice that this
al~lication will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and if approved by the board, will become effective 60 days
from the date of receipt (noted below) unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed which specifically disallows such
activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control Board within 60 days of the below noted date.
If site is located within a township, item 47 must be completed,
in addition to the county signature. If township is not organized,
county must sign.
47. Name of Township
46. Name of City or County (Local Governin~i Body)
Sign t~ur~ of person receiving applicjatio~,
X ~.~/' / h`.{ ~" ~da er,~
~le' ' ~ Date received (60 y p
~ a, · r begins from this date)
c, ' '
of ~r~eli~rin~ a~ation to L~al G~erning B~
~. ~m~¢,, /":~"''/ I ~]
CG-~1-03 (3/89) White Copy-Board
Signature of person receiving application
X
Title
Pink-Local Governing Body
Canary-Applicant
Page 2 of 2
For November 14, 1989 Council Meeting
November 7, 1989
GAMBLING LICENSE -- Renewals - New License Period: 3-1-90 to 2-28-91
Class A (Bingo, Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull-Tabs)
American Legion Post #398
2333 Wilshire Blvd.
Mound, Minn. 55364
Class B (Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards, Pull-tabs)
Northwest Tonka Lions
AT: Mack's Jock Club
5241 Shoreline Dr.
Mound, Minn. 55364
THIS APPLICATION WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE CHARITABLE GAMBLING CONTROL
BOARD AND IF APPROVED BY THE BOARD WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE 60 DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF RECEIPT (10-30-89 & 11-03-89), UNLESS A RESOLUTION OF THE
LOCAL GOVERNING BODY IS PASSED WHICH SPECIFICALLY DISALLOWS SUCH
ACTIVITY AND A COPY OF THAT RESOLUTION IS RECEIVED BY THE CHARITABLE
GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE.
LICENSE RENEWAL -- Expires Nov 30, 1989.
New License Period 12-1-89 to 11-30-90.
Approval contingent upon all required forms, insurance
etc. being turned in.
Entertainment Permit
Mack's Jock Club
5241 Shoreline Dr.
Mound, Minn. 55364
November 2, 1989
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK
GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION
Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church is renewing their Gambling
License with the MinnesOta Department of Gaming for bingo, raffles,
paddlewhells, tipboards, and pull-tabs. They have asked that the
City waive the 60 day waiting period if there is no objection to
their license being renewed. We have done this for other organizations
in the past.
fc
An equal opportur,~t¥, Employer that does not d~scr~m~nate on the bas~s of race color, national or~gin, or hand~capped status
m the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities
~UBLIC DOCUMENT CONTAININ~ PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE
RESPONSIBLE ~UTHORITY TO ~DMINISTER THE MINNESOT~ C,O~ERNMENT
D~T~ Pl~TI~9 ~T
I, Edward J. ~hukle, Jr., th~ Responsible Authority for/~--~
of Mound, Mlnne~ota, appointed under a resolution/(89-136)~
adopted by the City Council on the 10th day of Octob~r~_ 1RB97~,
hereby establish the following procedures for the administration
of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act:
1. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL DATA MAINTAINED BY THE CITY
Attached is a list of records maintained by the City which
contain private or confidential data on individuals. This list
will be updated annually by the Responsible Authority.
2. RIGHTS OF DATA SUBJECTS
The rights of individuals on whom the data is stored or to be
stored by this city are as set forth below:
ae
An individual asked to supply private or confidential data
concerning himself will be informed of: (1) the purpose and
intended use of the requested data within the city; (2)
whether s/he may refuse or is legally required to supply the
requested data; (3) any known consequence arising from
his/her supplying or refusing to supply private or
confidential data; and (4) the identity of other persons or
entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the
data. (This requirement does not apply when an individual
is asked to supply investigative data to a law enforcement
officer.)
Be
Upon request to the Responsible Authority, or designee, an
individual will be informed: (1) whether s/he is the
subject of stored data on individuals; and (2) whether it is
classified as public, private, or confidential.
Upon his/her further request, an individual who is the
subject of stored private or public data on individuals will
be shown the data without any charge to him/her and, if s/he
desires, will be informed of the content and meaning of that
data. After an individual has been shown the private data
and informed of its meaning, the data need not be disclosed
to him/her for six months thereafter unless a dispute or
action pursuant to this section is pending or additional
data on the individual has been collected or created.
De
The Responsible Authority, or designee, will provide copies
of data upon request by the individual subject of the data.
The actual cost of providing copies will be borne by the
individual.
The Responsible Authority, or designee, will comply
immediately, if possible, with any request made pursuant to
this section or within five days of the date of the request,
excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, if
immediate compliance is not possible. If s/he cannot comply
with the request within that time, s/he will so inform the
individual, and may have an additional five days within
which to comply with the request, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays.
An individual may contest the accuracy or completeness of
public or private data concerning himself/herself. To
exercise this right, an individual must notify the
Responsible Authority in writing describing the nature of
the disagreement. The Responsible Authority will within 30
days either: (1) correct the data found to be inaccurate or
incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of
inaccurate or incomplete data, including recipients named by
the individual; or (2) notify the individual that s/he
believes the data to be correct. Data in dispute will be
di-~closed only if the individual's statement of disagreement
is included with the disclosed data. The determination of
the Responsible Authority may be appealed as outlined in
Minnesota Statutes Section 13.04, Subd. 4 (2).
PROCEDURES FOR ACCESS TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DATA
Ail requests to examine, copies or summary data, must be in
writing and signed by the requesting party. All requests
should be directed to the Responsible Authority or, in
his/her absence, the City Attorney. All requests to inspect
data will be limited to normal business hours of the city.
Every attempt will be made to comply with requests in an
appropriate and prompt manner as specified by these
procedures and by the Minnesota Government Data Practices
Act.
Examination of the Data
1)
Public Data. Any person upon request to the
Responsible Authority, or designee, may examine public
government data without charge for any reason.
2)
Private or Nonpublic Data. Examination of private or
nonpublic government data is available without charge
only to: a) the subject of the data; b) persons within
the city whose work assignment reasonably requires
access; c) agencies authorized by state or federal law;
and d) agencies or individuals who have the express
written consent of the subject of the data subject to
all the rules and regulations setforth for informed
consent pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13.05,
Subd. 4, Subsection (d) relating to an insurer or its
authorized representative. Any such person or agency
seeking examination must identify themselves by
presenting a Minnesota driver's license, Minnesota
-2-
identification card, or other proof of identification
acceptable to the Responsible Authority or designee.
Confidential or Protected Nonpublic Data. Examination
of confidential or protected nonpublic data is limited
to: a) persons within the city whose work assignments
reasonably require access, and b) agencies or
individuals authorized by state or federal law to gain
access. Any such person or agency seeking examination
must identify themselves by appropriate identification
acceptable to the Responsible Authority. The
Responsible Authority cannot disclose the actual
confidential data to the subject of the data but, upon
request, shall inform the subject whether confidential
data is maintained on him/her. The subject of the
confidential data may gain access to this knowledge
only upon: a) appearance at the city office with
Minnesota driver's license or other picture
identification acceptable to the Responsible Authority
or, b) appearance by the subject's personal
representative identified by a Minnesota driver's
license or other picture identification acceptable to
the Responsible Authority and with a written and
notarized authorization by the subject of the data.
C. Explanation of the Data
Upon request to the Responsible Authority, an individual
receiving or inspecting data may receive an explanation of
the content and the meaning of the data which has been
received or inspected.
D. Copies of the Data
Any person, upon request to the Responsible Authority, may
receive copies of any data which s/he is entitled to
inspect. The Responsible Authority, or designee, will
provide copies within a reasonable time after receipt of the
request and charge the requesting party the actual costs of
the materials and any special costs necessary to produce the
copies. The fee is $.25 per page for copies and actual
cost/hour for the labor involved in preparation of the data
requested.
NOTE:
The city can charge for the labor involved in
actually making the copies but not for labor
involved in searching for and assembling the data
to be copied. Hourly costs should be calculated
at the employee's actual straight time hourly rate
times 1.35 and invoiced accordingly.
E. Access to Summary Data
Any person, upon request to the Responsible Authority, will
receive prepared summary data from public, private or
confidential data. Within 10 days of the receipt of the
-3-
request, the Responsible Authority, or designee, will inform
the requesting party of the estimated cost to provide the
summary data, or will provide a written statement describing
a time schedule for the preparation including reasons for
time delays, or will provide a written statement to the
requesting party stating why the Responsible Authority has
determined that access would compromise the private or
confidential data. The Responsible Authority will charge
the requesting party costs associated with the preparation
or summary data. The Responsible Authority will provide an
estimate of the fee to the requesting party before preparing
the summary and shall require payment in advance of the
preparation.
-4-
CONSENT FOR THE ]~ELEASE OF INFORMATION
I, authorize
(name of individual authorizing release) (name of
to disclose to
Responsible Authority in City) (name of individual or
the following information
entity to receive the information)
(description of information)
for the purpose of:
I understand that my records are protected under State and Federal
privacy regulations and cannot be disclosed without my written consent
unless otherwise provided for by law.
I also understand that I may cancel this consent at any time prior to
the information being released and that in any event this consent form
expires automatically 90 days after signing.
Signed this day of , 19__
(Signature of individual authorizing release)
(Signature of Witness)
(Month/day/year)
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
(Form of identification used)
Access: Inspect Copy Deny
If denied: Statute Classification
Cost for copying and compiling $
(Signature of Responsible Authority or Designee)
(Date reviewed)
-5-
REQUEST FOR 'rNFORI~T~'ON
(Last Name) (Middle) (First)
request the following information
(description of information)
for the purpose of:
I understand that I may cancel this request at any time prior to the
information being released and that in any event this consent form
expires automatically 90 days after signing.
Signed this day of , 19__
(Signature of individual)
DEPARTHEITT USE ONLY
(Form of identification used)
Access: Inspect Cop~ Den[
If denied: Statute Classification
Cost for copying and compiling $,
(Signature of Responsible Authority or Designee)
(Date reviewed)
~UTHORIZ~TION ~ CONSENT FOR
(Employment References)
I, , (name of individual authorizing
release) freely and voluntarily authorize the City of Mound its
employees and agents to disclose to
(name of individual, entity or person to receive the information) the
following information:
(description of information) for the purpose of
I understand that my records and information about me may be protected
under state and/or federal privacy laws or company policy and may not
be disclosed without my written consent unless otherwise provided for
by state or federal law. I also understand that I may revoke this
consent at any time except to the extent that action has been taken in
reliance on it and that in any event this consent expires (within a
reasonable period of time) not to exceed one year from the date set
forth below. In the case of authorizations given in connection with
applications for life insurance or nocancelable or guaranteed
renewable health insurance and identified as such, two years after the
date of the policy.
By signing this consent, I hereby release the City of Mound, its
employees and agents from any and all liability which otherwise may or
does accure as a result of the release of any and all information,
regardless of its accuracy. I also release
(name of individual, entity or person to receive the
information) from any and all liability for its receipt and use of
information and records received pursuant to this consent.
Executed this
day of , 19
Signature of individual authorizing release
Signature of witness
Signature of parent, guardian or authorized
representative when required.
-8-
MOUND°
The following i-~ a list of Dossible records maintained by
the city which contain private or confidential data on
individuals.
A. Government Data Classified as PRIVATE:
DESCRIPTION OF RECORD,
FILE, SYSTEM OR PROCESS
CLASSI-
FICATION
CITATION OP ST~TUTR
OR FEDERAL LAW THAT
CLASSIFIES THE DATA
Security Information
Absentee Ballots
Seal Bids
Labor Relations Information
Deferred Assessment Data
Federal Contracts Data
Health Data
Personnel Data
Sexual Assault Data
Elected Officials Correspondence
Firearms Data
Licensing Data
Benefit Data
Assessor's Data
Health Data
Offensive Photographs
Photographic Negatives
Corrections & Detention Data
Criminal History Data
Redevelopment Data (some)
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
13.37
13.37
13.37
13.37
13.52
13.35
13.38, Subd. 2
13.43
13.56
13.33
13.36
13.41
13.31
13.51
13.38
13.82
13.69
13.85
13.87
13.59
B. Government Data Classified as CONFIDENTIAL:
Property Complaint Data
Investigative Detention Data
Data in Arrest Warrent Indices
Reward Program Data
Deliberative Processess and
Investigative Techniques Data
Civil Legal Action Data
Domestic Abuse Data
Licensing Data
Foster Care Data
Housing Agency Data
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Active Criminal Investigative Data Confidential
Appraisal Data Confidential
Corrections & Detention Data Confidential
Law Enforcement Juvenile Data Confidential
13.44
13.86
13.82, Subd. 12
13.82., Subd. 14
13.82, Subd. 16
13.39
13.80
13.41
13.53
13.54
13.82, Subd. 5A
13.50
13.85
260.161, Subd.3
-9-
C. Government Data Classified as NONPUBLIC:
Security Information
Absentee Ballots
Sealed Bids, including the number
of bids received
Labor Relations Information
Examination Data
Salary Benefit Survey Data
Assessor's Data
Income Property Assessment Data
Housing Agency Data
Redevelopment Data (some)
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
Nonpublic
13.37
13.37
13.37
13.37
13.34
13.45
13.51
13.51
13.54
13.59
D. Government Data Classified as PROTECTED NONPUBLIC:
Labor Relations Information
Reward Program Data
Civil Legal Action Data
Housing Agency Data
Protected NP
Protected NP
Protected NP
Protected NP
13.37
13.82, Subd. 14
13.39
13.54
-10-
O0 'UO~
0~0
U
,.OO
:0
-12-
0
.,q
0
~ .fi .fi .fi .fi .fi .fi .fi
-13-
-14-
0
r~
I
U
0
U
DATA PRACTICES
POLIC~ D~P~RTM~NT ~.N~.RAL PROC~DUR~
ao
When you have received a request for data from an individual you
should:
Always ask the person to complete a Request for Information
form.
The person taking the request completes DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
part of form. Refer to the checklist below to determine
whether the data is public, private or confidential. Be
sure that the request is approved by a proper approving
authority (Harrell, Hudson, Roy). If no approving authority
is available, advise the requester when they can return for
the data (within five working days).
If copies are requested, calculate the cost.
4, subdivision D of Procedures.
(Refer to page
Require the requester to identify himself/herself with a
photo drivers license or a Minnesota photo Identification
Card. Verify by photo that you are dealing with the
requester.
Be
Information
Requested
Information relating
to a matter under
investigation
Information relating
to a matter no longer
under investigation
CHECKLIST
Classification
Confidential
Public
Response
Information on Page 1 of
the ICR is public. All
other information is
confidential and may be
released only to a proper
public agency authorized
by law to receive it.
Make sure the matter
hasn't been classified
private or confidential
because it relates to
juveniles, sex abuse, sex
assault, or other
catagory listed below.
State Accident Reports
Information relating
to a citizen complaint
or request for police
service.
Response/incident data
which documents the
MPD response to a
request for service
or complaint.
Confidential
or *Private
If the department has an
ICR, then Page 1 may be
released. But the State
Accident Report filled
out by one of the persor
involved in the accident
is confidential. The
report filled out by the
officer may be released
to a person involved in
the accident. (See, M.S.
169.09, Subd. 13)
*Minnesota Statutes 169.09, Subd. 13
provides that a party to an accident
may receive this report. Therefore,
under the definitions of the Data
Privacy Act, this is classified as
private, even though the motor vehicle
code uses the term confidential.
*Private,
Public or
Confidential
If the department has an
ICR, then Page 1 data is
public and may be
released. The balance of
the report may be
released only to the
individual subject of the
data or a proper agency.
*Minn. Stat. Sect. 13.82, Subd. 3
provides that requests for service are
public data; however, some of this
information may be confidential under
Subd. 10.
*Private,
Public or
Confidential
Page one of the ICR is
public. The rest of the
report is private.
*Minn. Stat. Sec. 13.82, Subd. 4
provides that incident data is public;
subject to Subd. 10.
Identity of undercover
agents, informants,
victims of sexual
assault or intra-
familial sex abuse.
*Confidential This information should
never appear on Page 1 of
an ICR.
*See Section 13.82, Subd. 10.
Arrest warrant indices
Description of stolen,
lost or recovered
property.
Criminal history data
compiled by the BCA and
documented through CJIS.
Name of persons who
register complaints
concerning violations
of law or ordinances
concerning real property.
Informat data
(investigative data
which reveals an
informant).
Investigative data
relating to civil
actions.
Domestic Abuse data
collected pursuant to
the domestic abuse act.
Maltreatment of minors
Confidential
Private
Nonpublic
Private
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Confidential
Private
Once the individual has
been arrested on the
warrant, or served with
the warrant or has
appeared in court, the
arrest warrant indices
become public.
The fact that we have
recovered an item of
stolen property is
public, but the descrip-
tion of the item is
private, nonpublic.
See Minn. Stat. Sec.
13.87, Subd. 2 provides
that the individual can
receive the criminal
history data; and Sec.
13.02, Subd. 12.
These are areas normally
enforced by the building
and zoning official.
This information should
not be placed on Page 1
of an ICR.
This information is
confidential if the
investigation is active.
The City Attorney must be
contacted to determine
whether the matter is
active.
The confidential status
may change when a court
order is served on the
respondent. Be careful
of overlap with juveniles
or victims of sexual
assault or intra-familial
sex abuse (all protected
catagories.
In the matter is under
investigation, the
investigative data is
confidential.
Maltreatment of adults
Private
In the matter is under
investigation, the
investigative data is
confidential.
-18-
BILLS ....... NOVEHBER 14, 1989
BATCH 9103
BATCH 9104
6O,539.94
157,520.46
TOTAL BI LLS
218,060.40
AP-C02-OI
UENI)OR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE ~ BATE BATE STATU~
B0500 PRE-PAIO
10/31/8~ 10/31/89
BILL CLARK OIL CO('~ANY VENDOR TOTAL
B0670 PRE-PAIl)
10/31/8~ 10/31/89
BOYER TRUCKS VENOOR TOTAL
B0730 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS VENDOR TOTAL
C0888 F~-P~II)
10/31/89 10/31/89
CIT'~ COUNTY CREDIT UNION W, NI)OR TOTAL
COt20 P~-PAII)
10/31/89 10/31/89
PRE-PAIl)
10/31/89 10/31/89
CITY OF MOUI~ VENDOR TOTAL
C0999 PRE-PAIl)
10/31/89 10/31/89
CI]I~ERCIAL LIFE INS CO ~NI)OR TOTAL
CIO01 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
C08MISSIONER OF ~ VENIX~ TOTAL
E1429 PRE-PAIl)
10/31/89 10/31/89
PI~-PAID
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
G1955
10/31/89 10/31/89
VENI)O~ TOTAL
PRE-PAIl)
10/31/89 10/31/t1~
F u~<CmAbE v6Uh, N~L
CIT) OF NOUND
13.25
13.25
1~.~
4,250.~
4,250.~
8,500.00
8500.~
1~.~
914.~
914.~
24.80
24.80
26.13
~.13
49.9
1.80
51.30
51.3
2,2~.48
2,244.48
2244.48
168.47
I1.51-
659.69
11.91-
813.~
1473.9
1,163.~
1,163,~
OESCRIPTION
GREASE, OIL
1976 FOP, l) ~
1976 FOP, I) ~
RIP RAP ROCK
3/4 RED ROCK
Ca UNION 10/14 PR
JI~J..-CO
RE)~t. EN P/C-LIO
REPt. EN P/C-L~
dRNL-CI)
LIFE INS 10/14 PR
LIFE INS 10/14 PR
SIT 10/14 PR
dRtl.-Cl)
LIO
WINE
DISC
LIO
WINE
l)ISC
JR~i.-CO
OEF C8~P 10/14 PR
,JI~.-CO
01-4290-2250
1010
73-7300-.5000
78-780~-5000
1010
01-4399-4100
78-7800-2340
I010
1010
71-7100-22(X)
I010
01-4140-4120
1010
01-4190-1520
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
71-7100-9~10
71-7100-~20
71-7100-9~0
1010
71-7100-9~10
71-7100-~20
71-7100-95~0
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
PRE-PAIl)
24.80
26.13
51.30
2244.48
659.69
813.88
1163.00
TIME %09.12
29951 I0/31,
2995O 10/31/89
29939 10/24/89
29927 10/19/89
29940 10/24/89
29916 10/25/89
29933 10/19/89
2992O I0/19/89
29945 10/25/89
29958 10/31/89
29924 10/19'
PgGE 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL
~-C02-01 CHI 01: ~
II~OICE lie ~D
~AT ~ST LIFE A~ ~ TOTt 1~.~
G1971 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
GROUP NEALTH PLAN VENDOR TOTAL
61972 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/8~
PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
G~IG~S ~ & COmPAnY ~ TOTAL
H2145 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
HE)~ CO SUPI~T & COLLECT* VENDOR TOTAL
I~01 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-4S7 VENIX]R TOTAL
12304 PRE-PAIO
10/31/89 10/31/89
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-401 VENOOR TOTAL
235,60 GRP HLTH DED 10/14 PR
235.~0
734.95 LIQ
93.96 WINE
17.41- DISC
7.67 VT
31.98 MIX
851.15 ,J~NL-CD
306.69 LIQ
6.51- DISC
2.45 FRT
302.~ ,.I~I~.-CD
115,3.78
2~8.460ED 10/14 PR
2138,46 ,JR~I.-CD
288.46
512.90 ICMA 457 10/14 PR
512.90 JRN.-CD
512,90
91.98 ICMA 401 10/14 PR
91.91) JR~-CD
91.98
J2571 PRE-PAID 468.00 72 CONTRACT
10/31/89 10/31/89 468.00 JRJ4.-CD
~ TAFFE VENDOR TOTAL
J2579 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10131/89
PTUE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
.~DN BROS Wt. EX.ESALE LI* VENI){3R TOTAL
J25430 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
1,159.29 LIQ
.55 WINE
23.21- i)I~
1,136.63 J1~'4.-C13
1,755.01 LIQ
1,361.27 WINE
48.73- OISC
3,067.55
4204.18
218.46 LIQ BAGS
218.46 JR]~.-CD
01-204.0-(M)00
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
71-7100-9600
71-7100-9540
I010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9560
71-7100-9600
1010
01-2040-(X)00
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-4340-3100
I010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-2200
1010
PRE-PAID
851.15
302.63
512.90
91
113.63
3067.55
218.46
TI~ 9,~.12
29931 10/19/89
29~41 10/24/89
29926 10/19/89
29~23 10/19/89
29922 10/19/89
29954 10/31/89
29942 10/24/~
29956 10/31/89
29944 10/24/89
~w~E j PURCHASE JOURNAL
~-C02-01 CITY O~ MOU~D
INVOICE OUE NOLD
NO. INVOICE ~ ~TE ~ STA~ ~ ~IPTI~
~ P~ ~Y ~ TDT~ 218.~
~ ~-PAID 1,1~.49 ~ ~ ~ 10/14 ~
10/31/~ I0/31/~ 1,1~.49 ~-CO
~ ~ ~ ~ ~N~ TOT~ 11~.49
~ ~-PAIO 1~.75 ~A ~ 10/14 ~
I0~1~ I0/31~ 1~.~ ~-CD
~IT ~ ~ TDT~ 1~.~
~ ~-PAIO 142.~ ~ ~CTI~
I0/31/~ 10/31/~ 142.~
~ ~ TOT~ 142.~
~1 ~E-PAID ~.~ ~ ~ 10/14 ~
10/31/~ 10/31/~ ~.~
~I~ SYS~ ~ TOT~ ~.~
~I0 ~-PAID 1~.~ W~ RI~ ~
1~.~ W~ TIM ~
10~1/~ I0/31/~ ~.~ ~-~
~ ~I~ ~INIC ~ TOT~ ~.~
~ ~-PAIO ~.~ ~T8 F~ ~ BI~S
~.TB ~TG F~ ~ OILLS
10/31/~ 10~1/~ 131.~
~-PAID ~.45 ~ ~TG ~ ~
81.~ ~~TG~~
2.~ ~ ~TG ~ ~
~.13 ~~TG~R~
2.~ ~N ~TG ~R ~
13.~ ~N~TG~~
41.~ ~~TG~~
17.~ ~~TG~~
111.10 ~ ~TG ~ ~
~.~ ~ ~TG ~R ~
40.~ ~~TG~~
~.~ ~ ~TG ~ ~
12.~ ~TG~T~
1.~ ~N~TG~~
12.~ ~TG~~
2.~ ~ ~TG ~ ~
I0.4S ~ ~T~
10~1/~ 10/31/~ ~.~ ~-CO
~ TOT~ 731.~
~-PAID ~2.~
I'[BL I0/14 I~
ACO~T NUBIER
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
I010
01-23(X)-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
I010
01-4280-3600
01-42B0-3800
1010
73-7300-3210
70-78(X)-3210
1010
01-4070-3210
01-4020-3210
01-4040-3210
01-4060-3210
01-4090-3210
22-4170-3210
71-7100-3210
01-4340-3210
01-43,")0-3210
01-4190-3210
73-7300-3210
78-7800-3210
01-4140-3210
01-4280-3210
01-4270-3210
01-4090-3210
01-4020-3210
01-1190-0000
01-4320-3210
1010
PRE-PAID
A~
117~.49
193.7'5
142.00
288.00
232.00
131.S6
£~qlE 10/31/89
TI~ 9.09,12
2993O 10/19/89
29934 10/19/89
29936 10/24/89
29925 10/19/89
299~2 10/31/89
29918 lO/20tO9
2<~49
-~u~- 4 P U ~ C H A S E J 0 U R N A L DATE 10/.31/8~
AP-C02-OI CITY OF MOUND TIME 9.09.12
10/31/89 10/31/89
MUTUAL DE~IT LIFE VENDOR TOTAL
N3&85 PR~-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
NATIONAL K,~,RATE SCHOOL VENDOR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
ORTHOPAEDIC CONSULTANTS VENDOR TOTPi.
PRE-PAID
10/31/8~ 10/31/8~
P E R A VENDOR TOTAL
P40~ PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
PR¥$ICIANS OF N~ VID~X]R TOTAL
P~31 PRE-PAID
10/31/8~ I0/31/~
PHYSICI~S OF N~ VENDOR TOTN.
P4115 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10~1/89
PRU[ENTIN. INSURANCE CONGA VENDOR TOTAL
D4171 PRE-PAID
I0/31/8~ 10/31/89
PRE-PAID
10/31/8~ 10/31/89
QUALITY WI~E & SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL
R4259 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
ROBERT E JO-~FJDN VE]~I)OR TOTN.
S4500 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89
STATE BAIJ( OF MOUND VENDOR TOTAL
AMOUNT
552.99
552.~9
5%00
5%O0
5~.00
b,212.09
b,212.09
6212.09
6,563.10
266.00
6,829.10
205°45
205.45
205.45
2,468.57
50.03-
2,483.19
1,501.19
32.33-
1,698.51
4181.70
30~.48
308.48
308.48
10,142.75
10,142.75
10142.75
~SCRIPTION
K, NRATE-~L ~FI~
JRN.-CD
W/C--RICH dOhlISON
JRI~.-CD
PERA 10/14 PR
J~l.4CD
Pt~ [ED 10/14 PR
~ -CD
JRNL-CD
~ LIFE [ED 10/14 PR
J~ -CD
LID
WINE
DISC
J~NL-CD
WINE
DISC
JRi~.-CD
32 CDNTRACT HOURS
J~L-CD
FIT 10/14 PR
JRN.-CD
I010
01-4150-4110
1010
01-4280-3600
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-4140-1510
1010
01-4140-1510
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
7!-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
I010
01-4340-3100
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
PRE-PAID
552.99 29935 10119189
250.00 2~60 10/31/89
59.00 29961 10/31/89
6212.09 29921 10/19/85)
6.(F29.10 2x~929 10/19/89
205.45 2'9937 10/24/89
200.00 29932 10/19/89
2483.19 29943 10/24/89
1698,51 29957 10/31/89
308,48 29953 10/31/89
10142,75 29919 10/19/89
3qqq
AP-C02-O1
VENI)(]R INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE )~BR OAIE OATE STATUS
PURCHASE
CITY ~ 80UND
PJ'CI~T ~SO~IPTI~
JOURNAL
DATE
TIME 9.~. 12
PRE-PAID CHECK
AMOLNT CHECK I DATE
S4511 PRE-PAID
10/31/89 10/31/89 498.33
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT ~ION VENDOR TOTAL 4~,33
T4809 PRE-PAID 2,180.51
10/31/89 10/31/89 2,180.51
TIME INSURANCE ~ANY VENDOR TOTAL 2180.51
W5320 PRE-PAID 98.50
45.00
10/31/89 I0~1/89 143.,50
WA(~]NIA EME~ENCY ~Y$ICIA VENDOR TOTAL 143.~
~)30 ~-PAID 81.90
10/31/89 10/31/89 81.90
WA(~]NIA RI[lGEVI~ HO~ITAL ~ TOTAL 81.~
~20 PRE-PAID 6.,50
10/31/89 10~I/89 13.00
~STO&)CA CH~&MBER ~ ~ ~E)~)OR ll)TAL 13.00
WS5~ PRE-PAID 981 .&O
10/31/89 10/31/89 9~1.60
~STD~,A COR~UNIT¥ ACTN N* VEI~)OR TOTAL 981.60
ll]TAL ~ l,~c'lkq)ORS ~,539.94
01-2040-0000
I010
71-1280-0000
1010
01-4140-3600
01-4140-3600
I010
01-4140-3600
1010
01-4040-4120
Ol-MO~O-(120
1010
16-58~6-(100
I010
498.33 2992B 10/19189
2100,51 ~ 10/24/89
143.~0 2~948
81.~0 2<~47
13.00 ~17 10/18~
~1.~ ~9 10/31/~
.,:,Ltt ct/? - .,~_,~ q ~ /
: ~GE. t
AP-C02-O1
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO, INVOICE ~ DATE DATE STATUS
I1/08/~9 11/0~/~
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
AERIAL PAINTING, INC VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11108189
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK VEND[IR TOTAL
A0371
11/08/8~ 11/08/8~
APPtE VALLEY REAOY MIX VENOOR
I)0521
11/08/89 11/08/89
BALBOA MII~ESOTA C{3N~ANY VENDOR TOTAL
B0540
11/08/8~ 11/O8/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/~
BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS DF M VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
~ CDJNTRY STONE VEND{IR TOTAL
~ URCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF MObt~D
103.74
24,4~
101.49
20.~
30,02
4.47
4.47
27.72
4.47
16.58
418.09
418.09
5,676.00
5,676.00
5676.00
240.00
240.00
240.00
381.75
381.75
381.75
990.00
7.50
7,50
12.50
2.50
30.00
4,577.65
4,57'7.65
33.75
234.25
270.00
270.00
DESCRIPTI~
~T
~T 0~I~
~T DFFI~
~T OFl:I~
~T DFFI~
~T DFI:I~
OCT OFI:ICE
~T DFFI~
~T DFFI~
~T OFFI~
~T DFFICE
JRNL-CD
~UPSq_IES-FILE POO<T
SUPPLIES
StI:TtlES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PAINT LIGHT POLES
JRNL-CD
TIF FEES
JRI4.-CD
CONCRETE
~ -CD
PARKING LEA..qE TII~U NOV '89
PA,qXING LEASE ~ NOV '89
PARKING LEASE ~ NOV '89
JRNL-CD
OCT OXYGEN
OCT OXYGEN
OCT OXYGEN
OCT ACETYLENE
JR~-CD
OCT RECYCLE SERV
JRNL-CD
REPAIR WALLS
REPAIR WALLS
JRNL -CD
01-4070-2100
01-4090-2100
01-4140-2100
01-4190-2100
01-4340-2100
01-42"80-2100
71-7100-2100
73-7300-2100
78-7800-2100
01-4095-2100
01-4040-2100
1010
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
[~TE 11/08/8;
TIME 13.24.49
01-4280-4200
1010
54-S600-6120
I010
01-4379-4100
1010
01-4280-4200
73-7300-4200
78-7800-42(X)
1010
73-7300-2200
78-78(X)-2200
01-42<90-2200
O1-4290-2200
1010
01-4270-4200
I010
01-4280-4200
73-7300-4200
1010
:AGE 2 PURCHASE
AP-C02-O1 CITY DF MOUND
VENODR INVOICE OUE HOLO
NO. INVOICE ~ DATE DATE STATUS A~OL~iT OESCRIPTION
11/08/B9 11/00/89 667.30 ,.mRll.-CD
BRYAN RD(]( PRDIX~CTS VENI)OR TDTAL 667.30
B0771 68,66 '90 INVENTDRY 11/08/89 11/08/8~ 64).66 JRNL-CD
BUSINES~ RECORDS CORPORATI VENDOR TDTAL 68.66
C0821 256.92 CLEAN CPT-CITY HALL
11/08/89 11/08/89 256.92
CARPETCLEAN VEI~)OR TOTAL 256.92
C0832 23.56 FLEX EXTENSION
23.56 dR)iL-CD
1110811~r1 11/08/1~
CBS TIRE & SUPPLY C~ VENOCR TOTAL
12.57 WATER BILL-LIQ
11/08/89 11/08/8~ 12.57 dR)(.-CO
CITY OF MOUNI) UENI)(]R TOTAL 12.57
C0~40
CLEAN STEP RENTAL
C0960
II/08/8~ 11108189
UENI)OR TOTAL
~3AST TO COAST
C0~70
11/08189 11108189
~ TOTAL
11/08/8~ 11/00/8~
COCA COLA BOTll. INO-MII)MEST VENI)OR TOTAL
39,14 OCT RUG RENT
26.3~ OCT RUG RENT
~S.49 JRf4.-CD
~.49
37.78 OCT ~ SUPI:q. IES
~.~ OCT HI3~E SUPPLIES
3.19 OCT ~ SUPPLIES
28.67 OCT HI)WE SL~t~.IES
8.59 OCT ~ ~IES
11.~ ~T ~ ~IES
I~.~ ~T ~ ~IES
~.59 ~T ~ ~IES
3.~ ~T ~ ~IES
2.19 ~T ~ ~IES
31.37 ~T ~ ~IES
18.12 ~T ~ ~IES
31.71 ~T ~ ~IES
12.49 ~T ~ ~IES
~.61 ~T ~ ~IES
3.~ ~T ~ ~IES
~.69 ~-CD
380.69
236.8~ OCT MIX
236.8~ dRNL-CI)
73-7300-2340
78-780O-234O
1010
71-7100-2200
1010
01-4320-3800
1010
22-4170-3~20
1010
71-7100-3740
1010
01-4320-4210
71-7100-4210
I010
01-4280-2200
01-421)0-2300
01-4280-2310
Ol
01-4."~)-2~:~'~
01-4~'~0-2310
01-4320-2200
01-4340-220()
01-4340-2300
01-4340-3820
22-4170-2200
73-73O0-2300
73-730O-2200
78-78(X)-2240
78-7800-2300
01-4290-2300
1010
71-7100-9540
1010
DATE 11/03/?
TI~ 13.24.49
PRE-PAID 04ECK
AMOUNT CHECK I DATE
INVOICE OLE ~OLO
NO. INVOICE M~BR DATE DATE SlATUS
AMOUNI IESCRIPIION
PRE-PAIO
CIOIO
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11108189 11/08/89
CDI~ICATIDN AUDITDR
C1020
CONCEPT MICROFILM
C1023
TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
COI~EY SAFETY PRODUCTS VEN1X]R TDTAL
Cl100
11/08/89 11/08/89
COPY DUPLICATING PRODUCTS VENDDR TOTAL
Cl120
CURTIS 1000
D1200
11/08/89. I 1/08/8~
VENI)OR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL
01238
11/08/89 11/08/8~
DEM-CON LANDFILL, INC VE]~ TDTAL
D1320
[)O~W~J.I) ~Y~
D1360
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
545,25 OCT CI~ MAINT
907.00 OCT ~ LEASE
1,452.25 JI~I.-CD
1452.25
49.53 PAJ3ER RE]~AIR
49.53 J;Uq{_-CD
49.53
268.76 FIXER,I)UPL FICHE
268.76 JR~.-CD
268.76
55.04 HARD HATS-LI~ERS
9.04 JRI~.-CD
21.00 COPIER MAINT-OCT
21.00 d~-CD
21.00
52.07 LE~D
52.07 ~O
52.07 LETTERtF. AD
52,07 LETIEIU-EAD
52.07 ~O
26,03 LETTER)qEAD
26.03 LETTER~F. AO
26,03 AAD
26.04 LEI'FERTE.AD
364.48 JRTJ.-CD
4,73'2.49' {:)CT BEER
4,732,49 JIU~L-CD
4732.49
10.00 OCT LANDFILL
I0.00 JRNL-CD
10.00
417.0Q OCT CHIEF SALARY
417.00 JRN.-CO
41%00
1,728.00 HI[~ & I10-PAVE
1010
22-4170-3820
1010
01-4140-4260
I010
73-7300-2200
1010
78-7800-3!rc,0
1010
01-4040-2100
01-40~0-2100
01-4140-2100
01-4190-2100
01-4340-2100
01-4280-2100
71-7100-2100
73-7300-2100
78-7800-2100
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
01-4280-3750
1010
22-4170-1370
1010
78-7800-4200
~Z,E 4
AP-C02-OI
INVOICE ~ HOLD
DATE DATE STATUS
11/O8/89 11/O8/89
DUN~NGRE A,,~ALT CDMP~Y
E1420
EAST SIBE BEVERAGE
E1430
EI~iA,ql)~E
El510
ELmm. LS ~G CO INC
F1660
~OYD ~ECt~ITY
F16~O
VENI}OR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/O8/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/O8/89 11/O8/89
VENI)~ TOTAL
11/O8/~ 11/08/89
VENIX]~ TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
VEIl)OR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/O8/89
FDUR STAR B~ SUPPLY
Fl710
FRANCE~ ~
Fl711
FRANCKS TRUCKING
GISO0
VENDOR TOTAL
11108189 11108189
~ TOTAL
11/O8/8~ I I/O8/~
VENI)OR TOTAL
11108189 11/O8/89
GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE
G1870
GERALD BABB
G1890
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF ~
1,728.00
1728.00
6,481.05
6.481.05
6481.05
19.58
34.20
53,78
~3.78
315.00
315.00
315.00
411.00
411.00
411.00
55.72
55,72
8,50
41,75
41.75
243.65
243.65
243.65
497,38
150.04
647.42
647.42
2~,55
2,83
OESCRIPTION
dRNL -CD
OCT BEER
,.JRt&-CD
MILEAGE
,.IRI~.oCD
ALARM S¥STM-LIG-SEMI
JRI~I-CI)
OCT MISC
JRtJ..-CO
MTG EXP-O_ARk
MTG EXP-CLARk
JRt&-CD
OCT FRT
,.~I~L-CD
REPAIR CLUTCH
I~Ak. ES-#8
OCT MAR~ALL SALARY
JRNL -CD
OCT ~TER COOLER
OCT ~TER COOL.ER
OCT WATER COOLER
OCT WATER COOLER
ACCOL~MBER
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
01-4040-3340
01-4040-4120
1010
01-4399-4100
1010
71-7100-3980
1010
71-7100-9550
1010
01-4060-4120
01-4040-4120
1010
71-7100-9600
1010
01-4280-3810
01-4280-3810
1010
22-4~70-1370
1010
01-4140-4100
01o4090-2200
01-4280-22(X)
[~TE 11/D$/89
TII'E 13.24.49
PRE-PAID CHECk.
AMOUNT C~ECK ! DATE
r~oi- t P LJ R £ H A S E J 0 U F; N A L r~TE
AP-C02-01 CITY OF ~ HI'[ 13.24.47
~1905
111081~ 1110818~
V~ TOTAL
11/08/99 11/08/~
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, INC VENDOR TOTAL
Q1970
GREG Sk II~E'R
H2030
11/00/89 11/08/~
VENDOR TOTAL
11/0~/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOT~_
11/08/~ 11/08/89
FECKSEL MACHI~ fllHDP VENDOR TOTAL
11/08189 11/08/89
~ CO I)EPT OF PROPERTY T VE'NI)OR TOTAL
11108/89 11/08/89
h~ CO S~'~I~5 I~PT ~ TOTAL
~ CO TREASURER
11/O8189 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
HO~D SIMAR
124OO
111O8189
UEN[E]R TOTAL
I 1/O8/89 11/08/89
2.~
79.~
~6.~
~6.~
~6.~
7.~
7.~
7.~
208.18
9.~
~.40
1,608.OO
Ib08.OO
248.~2
~,40
240.®
113.OO
~3.~
12.~
~2.~
293.~2
DE~IPTION
~T ~TER COOLER
OCT ONE-C~LL
SHOP FOR TRUCK EXP
~ -CD
REPLPL'E WINDOW-~IEF~S
~T~ F~ ~5
FILE ~-T~X F~EIT
~T ~I~ ~
~T ~D
~I~-C ~
~T SI~ ~
~-CO
~ U ~TS-)14
~AIR ~IS~-~IL T~
~ TI~S )3
S~I~ ~-~ ~V
E~I~,~S-)841
~ ~T~
~-CO
1010
73-7300-4200
I010
73-7300-22OO
1010
01-4140-3810
1010
01-4280-2310
01-4280-2310
lOlO
01-4320-4100
1010
01-4110-4250
1010
01-4110-4~.'50
1010
80-8000-1300
01-4320-1300
01-4270-1300
1010
22-4170-2'200
78-78OO-~10
73-7300-3810
01-4140-3810
01-4140-3810
01-4290-3820
1010
I:~E-PAII)
AP-C02-01
NO. I~I~E ~l~
INVOICE DUE HOLD
DATE DATE STATUS
~ TOTAL
~ BERTRN~
K2~51
L2791
I.,2851
11/0~/89 11/0~/89
~ TOTAL
11/08/89 11/0~/89
~ TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
VEI~rI[]R TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/8~
VENIX]R TOTAL
11/08/8~ 11/0~/8~
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS T* ~ TOTAL
LEONARD HARRELL
L2911
LOIS SANDQUIST
11/00/~ 11/~/~
VENI][]R TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
VI~EIOR TOTAL
11/O~/~P 11/0~/89
LI]I~"I..L'S AUTDMDTI~/ZITCD* VENDOR TOTAL
L29~
CITYOFHOtJND
N'IOI~T
48.68
5.00
290.83
344.51
344.51
15.00
15.00
15.00
33.14
33.14
33.14
50.00
50.00
4,025.00
185.00
2,315.00
230.00
612.75
2,675.00
350.00
~4.00
12,~6.~
1~6.75
63.39
63.39
63.39
6.34
6.34
150.29
907.37
1,057.6~
1057.66
IESCRIPTION
CO~ MILEAGE
CO~ EXP
CLOTHING-FACKLER
NO STAR MTG
dS~4.-CD
4~ QTR-W(]RKE]~3 ~ INS
4~ QTR-WORKERS ~ INS
4TH QTR-WORXEAa3 ~ INS
4TH QTR-WI]RKERS CO~P INS
4T~ QTR-WORKE~"3 ~ INS
4TH QTR-WORKE~ ~ INS
4TH QTR-WI]RXE]~j ~ INS
4TH OTR-WORI(E)~3 ~ INS
4TH QTR-WORXERS COMP INS
4TH QTR-WORI(ERS ~ INS
4TH QTR-~ ~ INS
D~T'ENSIVE TACTIC LUNCH
dR}4.-CD
MI~
dR}4. -CD
OCT AUTO P~TS
OCT AUTO PA~TS
JI~.-CD
~ REM[M.-1612 EAGLE-ASSESS
01-4340-3340
01-4340-4120
01-4340-2240
1010
01-4190-4120
1010
01-4290-2310
1010
78-7B00-2200
1010
Ol
01-4090-3600
01-4140-36~)
01-41~-3600
01-421)0-3600
01-4290-3600
01-4~-3400
~-4170-34~)0
71-7100-."~0
73-7300-3~0
78-7800-3/~X)
1010
01-2300-0220
1010
01-4090-3340
I010
22-4170-Z200
01-4290-2310
1010
01- 1190-0000
DAlE 11
TIME 13.24.49
P~E-PAID CHEO(
AMOUNT CI~CK ! DATE
-~ / ~ U ~ C l~ A 5 E ~ U U ~ ~ A L L~i~ liivl~V:~?
AP-C02-OI CITY ~ ~ TI~ 13.2¢.~9
LUTZ TREE SERVICE
83O3O
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENI)OR TOTAL
11108189 11/08/89
MA~K VII DISTRIBUTOR VENIK)R TOTAL
83O71
MAYER L~ I~
M3170
111O8189 11/08/89
VENI)OR TOTAL
111O8189 11/08/89
METRO WASTE CDNTRDL COH~I* ~ TOTAL
M33O0
MID-CENIRAL, INC
M3207
I 11O8189 11/08/89
VE){IX)R TOTAL
11/08/89 111O8189
MIl]WEST BOLT & SUPPLY VENDOR TOTAL
M3271
11/08/89 11/08/89
MN CELLULAR TELEPHD'~ CO VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
MN I]EPT DF PUBLIC SAFETY VENDOR TDTAL
8347O
11/08/89 11/08/89
MN VALLEY TESTING LABORATD VENOOR TDTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
MOTORDLA INC VENI]OR TDTAL
A{'KIJNI' ~50UPTION
1,27S.00 TREE REMOVAL
2,870,00 TREE RID'IOV~
4SO.O0 FORCD TREE RE]4OVL-~-BILL
5,795.00 J~NL-CI)
7,O85.3O (]CT BEER
7,0~)5.3O
7085.30
24.(X) WOOD
24.00 JRNL-CD
24.00
31,569.05 NOV ~ SERVICE
12,294.96- NOV SEk~ SERVICE
615.86- NOV SEWER SERVICE
18,658.23 JRM.-CD
166.00 9L I CER, FLUROPDLIFI)OL
166.00 JRNL-CD
166.00
7.36 UNITAP TRUSS
7.36 UNITAP TRUSS
52.06 NUTS,BOLTS
66.78 JRM,-CD
66.78
64.40 CELLULAR TELE
64.40 JRNL-CD
150,00 ~D gTR COI~CT CHG
~.00 3RI) gTR OI:LrRATION CHI3
24.0.00 JRM.-CI)
240
44,00 WATER ANALYSIS
44.00 JRNL-CI)
44,00
~,3%,50 PAGERS,BATTERIES
1,3%.S0 dRNL-CD
1396,~
81-4350-5110
01-4340-5110
01-1190-0000
1010
7i-7i00-~
lOlO
0i-4280-2200
lOlO
78-7800-423O
78-1190-0000
78-3812-0000
1010
22-4170-2200
1010
01-4290-2250
78-78(X)-2300
01-4280-2300
1010
01-4140-3220
1010
01-4140-3800
01-4140-~)00
1010
73-7300-3100
1010
22-4170-3200
1010
ri-adc.
AP-C02-OI
VIE)II)DR INVOICE I]IJE HOLD
NO. INVOICE M~)R DATE DATE STATUS
11/08/89 11/08/89
8OlJND FIRE I]EPA~TMENT VENIX]R TOTAL
11108189 11/08/89
MOLWD FIRE REI. IEF ASSN ~ TOTAL
143510
11/08/89 11/08/89
HOUND MEl)ICAL CLINIC VENIMIR TDTAL
MlKA REFRIGERATION
11/088/89 11/08/89
VE)~)OR TOTAl.
I 1/08/89 11/08/89
~TL ANIMAL CONTROL ASSN
N2740
~ SIGNS
N3770
TOTAl.
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/O8/89
NORTH STAR WATERWORKS ~ VENDOI~ TDTAL
N3800
11/08/89 11/08/89
NORTJ~ERN STATES ~ CO VE)IDDR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
NOVA ENVIROt~I~ENTAL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL
P4(XX)
r u h,L,H hbi: d UU K NA k
CII¥ ~ 80b~D
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
5,309.75 OCT SALASIE9
1,008.08 OCT MAINT
665.00 OCT DRILLS
6,974.75 JRNL-CD
6974.75
4,871.83 NOV FIRE RELIEF PENSION
4,871.83 JRNL-CD
4871.83
27.00 W/CCLAIM-R JOFI~:JON
27.00 JRNL-CD
27.00
149.29 REPAIR DOOR
149.29 JR~-CO
149.29
32.5 NACA ~INI~ ~IE
32.~ JRNL-~
96.00 DEAO ENO FACES
11.59 LETTERS
107.59 JRNL-CD
107.59
298.88
324,35
,50.63
321.30
245.94
200.71
2,067.42
675.76
3,B86.11
2,441.~0
2,441.50
2441.50
OCT ELECTRICITY
OCT ELECTRICITY
OCT ELECltRICITY
OCT ELECTRICITY
OCT ELECTRICITY
OCT ELECTRICITY
OCT ELECTRICITY
JRNL-CD
DA~ TAI~ REMOVAL
JRM. -CD
20~.5~ OCT MIX
22-4170-1290
22-4170-3190
22-4170-1380
1010
95-9508-1400
1010
01-42'80-3600
1010
71-7100-3820
1010
01-4140-4130
I010
01-42t)0-2360
01-4270-2200
1010
73-7300-23(X)
1010
01-4280-3710
01-4340-3710
01-4320-3710
71-7100-3710
2'2-4170-3710
73-7300-3710
78-7800-3710
1010
60-6000-~8~)0
1010
71-7100-9540
PRE-PAID
N'IOUNT
TI~ 13.24.49
AP-C02-OI CIT)' OF MOUND TIME 13.24.49
NO, INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE 5TAll.~
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
P4060
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11108189 111O8189
~ DISTRII~UTING CO VENDOR TOTAL
P4064
11/08/89 11/08/89
POLICE LIABILITY REVIEW VENDOR TOTAL
R4200
11/08/89 11/08/89
R L YOUNG[Wq{4. & ASSOCIATES VENDOR TOTAL
R4~Y9
RANDY'S SANITATION
R4280
RGNALD
R4290
RON'$ ICE CI~ANY
I 1/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11108189 1110~/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11108/89 11/08/89
SEELYE PLASTICS, INC
S4370
S4410
UEN['OR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
I 1/08/8~ 11/08/8'9
SMITH i-EATING & AIR
S4430
VENDOR TOTAL
I 1 108189 11 108189
VENIE)R TOTAL
AMEMJfF DESCRIPTI~
20&.56 ,..mRI~k-CD
2,39~.30 OCT BEER
2, .3~m .30 JRM.'CD
45.00 SUBSCRIP-POL LIAB REVIEW
45.00 JRNL-CD
45.00
60.0~ NOTARY BOND-HAI~<S
60.00 JR~I.-CD
73.00 OCT GARBAGE
73.00 JP, M. -CD
73.00
200.00 OCT ASST CHIEF SALARY
200.00 dRM.-CD
232.56 OCT ICE
232,56 JRI~.-CD
916.00 PLASTIC ShIEETS
916.00 JRIt.-CD
916.00
77.85 12-1-2 HOSP---KOPP
77.85 12-1-2 ~DSP---STUTSMA~
155.70 JRNL-CD
155.70
84.00 REPAIR ~-OEPOT
84.00 JRM.-CD
84.00
24.40 CAR~-EWALD
24.40 dRI~.-CD
24.40
115.50 OCT CAR WAS~
1010
71-7100-9~-J30
1010
01-4140-4170
1010
01-4140-3610
1010
01-4320-3750
1010
22-4170-1370
1010
71-7100-9540
1010
78-7800-23(X)
1010
01-4040-1510
01-4190-1510
1010
01-4340-2330
lOlO
01-4140-3500
lOlO
01-4140-3810
PRE-PAIl) O4EL'k
AMOUNT D'ED( ! DATE
F-AGE i() P U R C H A S E J O U ~ N A~. [hie ll/Uo/is?
AP-C02-OI CITY OF HDUND TI~ 13.24.49
VENDOR INVOICE DUE )OLD
NO. INVOICE ~ DATE DATE STATUS
11108/89 11108/89
SPRING PAR]< CAR WASH ~ TOTAL
STERNE ELECTRIC CD
T4715
11108/89 11108/89
VENDOR TOTAL
~IES TO GO
T4770
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENGOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
~ DISTRIBUTING CD VENDOR TOTAL
T4700
11/08/89 11/08/89
ltt)IFTY SNYDER DRUG NO4 VENDOR TOTAL
T4810
11/08/89 11/08/89
TI~EqD~&ALL LANDSCAPING VEI~X)R TOTAL
T4831
TDLL CDI'F~ANY
T4939
TRI-K SERVICES
T4970
11/08/89 11/08/8<)
VENIX)R TOTAL
11/08189 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/89
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CD VENDOR TOTAL
T491)0
11/08/89 11/08/89
21.00
136.~
I~.~
3,~7.~
3,987.~
3987.~
~.00
31.87
31.~
97,~
97.75
10,227.9
10,227,~
10~7.~
2.67
70,~
70.~
70.~
49.~
34.14
17.07
11.~
5.69
211.~
211.34
870.~
870.~
870.00
~.45
40.45
40.45
42,~
42,~
DESCRIPTION
OCT CA~ WASH
dRtJ. oCD
SERVICE ~ 7
dRNL
ll~ ).EI_P
ll~ ~ELP
OCT ~
dRlJ.
FI~
~ -CD
NAILS
JRN.-CD
STEEL
CABLE,LUGS
WDRK ~DVES
WORK GLDVES
WORK GI. DVES
WORK EOVES
dR~i.-CD
RIP RAP DRAIN-29~O IS VIEW
JRtJ.-CD
FIX ~ IX)OR
dRNL-CD
OCT MIX
JRNL-CD
ACCOUNT UBEt~
01-4280-3810
I010
73-7300-4200
1010
01-4270-1300
01-4270-1300
73-7300-1300
1010
71-7100-9530
1010
01-4190-2200
22-4170-2200
1010
01-4340-2200
1010
01-4290-2,?J0
01-4280-2310
01-421)0-2240
01-4290-2240
73-7300-224O
78-78OO-2240
lOlO
01-4399-4100
1010
01-4280-4200
1010
71-7100-9~,0
I010
r~r i. P U R C M A $ E J 0 d R N A L £,AT£ il.,"i~,=,~E:'~
~-C02-01 CITY OF I'KK.lqD TIME 13.24.49
VENIX]R INVOICE DUE HOLO
NO. INVOICE )~'IBR DATE OAT[ STATU~
lldIN CITY HOME JUICE CO VE]~'OOR TOTAL
11108/89 11/08/89
LmNIT~ RElqTAL SYSTEM VEN[K)~ TOTAL
~190
11/08/89 11/08/89
V~DORElg-~ZARI)-STALLINGS VENI)OR TDTAL
V5240
VILLAGE C~EVROLET
1/08189 11/08/89
VEN1](IR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/0~/89
WACOf4IA RI~I~ HOSPITAL VENI)(~ TOT~
11/08/89 11/08/89
WESTOf~F,A COf~4UNIT¥ ~ICE VENDOR TOTAL
WESTDE~<A FOD~
W5580
11/08/89 11/08/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/8~
~STDN~CA SA~NITATIUN VE]~II)OR TOTAL
W5641
WILKINS PONTI~
W5670
WILLIAMS STORE INC
11/08/89 11/08/89
UE)~ TOTAL
11/08/B9 11/08/89
VEND~ TOTAL
42.~4
~.71
121.00
117.72
60.17
60.17
1.71
431.02
431.02
617.50
617.S0
617.50
145.3~
145.3~
145.35
54.15
54.15
54.15
12,751.84
18,808.34
18808.34
21
55.67
123.86
123.86
'140.00
140.00
140.00
156.S6
lS6.56
81.00
81
81.00
OE~O~IPTION
OCT TOMELS
OCT RUGS
OCT UNIFOR~4S
OCT UNIFORMS
OCT UNIFORMS
OCT UNIFORMS
(]CT RAGS
JU~I.-CD
(~EPT ~ CONSLE. T
dR~&-CD
CAS TAf~(-SWR TRK
JRfE.-CD
W/C CLAIM-ROY
,JI~&-CD
J. JLY-AU~ PA~S ~
JUL¥-EUEPT L I FEGLWqP, I~
COFFEE
C)_EA~II~ SUPPLIES
d~U4. -CD
ALTERNATOR
dRNL -CD
BAL DF NICCUfl UNIFOR?I
JR)&-CD
Ol
73-7300-~00
Ol
01-42'~0-2240
73-73OO-224O
78-7800-2240
~-4170-2200
1010
01-41~-3100
1010
01-4290-2310
1010
01-4140-3600
1010
01-4360-4100
01-4340-4200
1010
73-7300-2200
01-4020-2200
Z2-4170-2~)1)0
1010
01-4340-3750
I010
01-4290-2310
1010
01-4140-2~40
1010
Pt{E-PAID t'VECK
AMOUNT DECK I BATE
AP-~02-O! tlT¥ OF MO~D TIME
VE)iOOR INVOICE
~. I)~M)I~ ~R DATE
~TE STATUS
i,~ MUELLER & SC)NS
W5700
I 1/08/8~ 11108189
VENDO~ TOTAL
11/08/89 11/08/8~
WURST-PEARSOR-LARSON VE)H30R TOTAL
X5750
XEROX CORM3RAT ION
Z5850
ZACK'S I~
Z6118
JEFFREY ANDERSEN
Z6130
BOB BOSMA
11/08/8~ 11/08/89
VE]~]~R TOTAL
111088/89 11/08/8~
UEBH)OR TOTAL
11108/89 11/08/89
VENBOR TOTAL
111O43189 111O8189
VENDOR TOTAL
TOTAL ALL VENDORS
A~OUNT
1,032.44
437.99
1,206.40
1,273.94
3,950.77
3950.77
1,550.00
857.00
3,130.00
802.00
1,220.90
75.00
10O.0O
425.00
266.75
1,052.25
9,828.90
51.46
5.31
56.77
13.75
13.75
13.75
25.00
25.00
157,S20.46
~SCRIPTI~
FILL ~
ASPHALT
ASPHALT
CONCRETE SAND
dRNL-CD
NOV RETAINER
~D QTR LEGAL
~O QTR LEC~AL-DENBI~
~1) g~ LE~-~ E~
~O Q~ LE~-~B~ST~ E~
~ Q~ LE~-~ VIEW E~
~O Q~ LE~-TRISTA E~
~D Q~ LE~-~DY~D,~W
~O g~ LE~-SI~IR CT
~ Q~ ~-P~OT,~IL B~
~O QTR LE~-~
PRINC-IOI2
INT -1012
JRNL-CD
S~EEPING ~
,JR~k-CD
REIMB FOR FILM
,JR~L-CD
CAR FOR TRAINING
JRNL-CD
73-730O-2340
73-730O-2340
73-7300-2340
01-4280-2340
I010
PRE-PAID O4ECK
AMOLmNI CHECK ! ~ATE
01-4110-310O
01-4110-3100
26-570O-310O
01-2~)-0~
01-2300-0%2
01-230O-0972
01-2300-0971
01-4190-3100
01-1190-0000
60-60O0-310O
73-7300-3100
1010
01-4320-50Q0
01-432~)-6110
1010
01-42'90-2250
1010
22-4170-2200
1010
22-4170-410O
1010
%4o-7
CITY of MOUND
November 7, 1989
TO:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
SUBJECT:
October's Activity Report
In your travels past Lost Lake storage site you might have noticed
that all the debris and rock, also the fill dirt has been used
and the north side of the lot is clean except for a small pile
of buckshot. Everything that we're hauling in now is being
stockpiled at the south side of the lot as far as possible from
Shoreline Dr.
This month has been a real nightmare as far as equipment
breakdowns. Last month (September) we took our 920 cat loader
to Zieglers for some major repair work, we ended up with a bill
for $7,890.92. Then the clutch went out of our Vac-all when we
were cleaning up leaves, $600.00. We weEe using the compressor
and hammers to cut blacktop for a watermain break when the front
seal let go on the engine, $650.00. We were hauling salt when
the keeper springs let go on the brakes for the back axel of
Unit #3 dump truck, $150.00. One of the old dump trucks that we
use for watermain breaks and for the Park Dept. blew an engine
and isn't worth fixing. We bought a used truck from Boyer Ford
and I don't know how much money we'll have ti¢~ up before we
get it on the road.
We cleaned up an area behind the Standard Oil Bulk Plant and
ended up with 12 loads of debris and dirt which we hauled out
to a dump site on County Road 26.
We spent a couple of days hauling the pile of used black top
out of Lost Lake site and taking it to Mayer for recycling.
As you know we had some contaminated soil aroung the fuel tanks
at the Island Park garage. We finally got the OK to get rid of
it, we hauled 10 loads to McCrossan where they ran it though
the blacktop burners.
The 18th we started to get our snowplow equipment ready
for winter.
CEMETERY
We staked outthe cemetery with lath so we can find the markers
in the snow, 200 lath. We also staked out 3 graves and 6 stones.
SIGN DEPT.
We put up our recycling signs again with the date changes and
also posted the 2900 block of Dickens Lane east side, No Parking.
We repaired 9 street sign posts and changed 11 signs.
CITY of MOUND
November 7, 1989
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Greg Skinner
Water & Sewer Supt.
October's Activity Report
WATER DEPT.
In October we pumped 25,652,000 gallons of water. There was
1 watermain break (due to the earthquake). There were 3 t-off
for non-payment.
With the nice weather in October the contractors were trying
to funish up on their jobs. We had 65 locations this month
for a total of $326.95. This is 3 locates per day.
At the first of the month Dave Morse (he is building the 3 condo's
in Three Points by pumphouse #7) call to inform me that the power
pole for #7 was located on his property and would like it moved.
Well we complied with his demand by removing the power pole
and running the wire underground to Well #7. The bad part was
this cost me approximately $4,500 that was not budgeted for.
He's happy, I'm not, but we do not have any utilities on his
property.
SEWER DEPT.
The month of October was costly for the Sewer Dept. We had
one pump in one of our lift station shatter a pump shaft. It
is in for repairs now to see how much it will cost to repair.
At 2872 Highland Blvd. a new house was put up and when they went
to hook to the city sewer there was no stub to the property line
even though our records indicated, there was. The property was
assessed for one stub. So we had to install a stub at our expense.
Tn~s came to $2,176 for the sewer stub and $1,728 for the repair
of the road.
Page 2
As the saying goes "Everything happens in three's" The third
happen during the windy days we had at the beginning of the
month. The power pole for our lift station located at the
east end of Dutch Lake was blown down. There we ran the power
lines underground and installed a short pole for our fuse box
and meter, this cost over $1,8OO.
For the month of October I do have some good news frQm bo~h
department$.~ehave finished our preparation for wi~ter. For
the Sewer Department we have finished wet wells and filter
maintenance. The Water is ready for anything and everything
that"Old Man Winter"can throw at us and all the fire hydrants
have been pumped and anti-freezed for the fire department boys.
Next month's report will hopefully be more positive and les~ '~'
costly.
One other thing, I was not in favor of fencing in Pembroke Park.
Now that the £ence is up I am even more dissatisfied with it.
This has created even more obstacles for us in inspecting and
maintaining the lift station, not to mention just getting in
there to perform these functions. I won't get into it any
further in this report, but if you would like to hear the
whole problem please contact me.
CITY of MOUND
November 7, 1989
TO:
FROM:
SUBEJCT:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Greg Bergquist
Mechanic
October's Shop Report
POLICE DEPT.
UNIT# MAKE
REPAIRS OR BREAK DOWNS
840 82 Chev.
841 89 Pontiac
842 88 Chev.
843 87 Pontiac
844 88 Chev.
845 88 Baretta
847 86 Chev.
service and inspection
service and inspection, left front
wheel bearing, alternator
service and inspection
drivers window repair, front brakes
service and inspection
service and inspection
service and inspection
service and inspection, installed
new rack and pinion steering
PARKS DEPT.
82 Chev. P.U.
Installed new windshield wiper
switch, repaired steering, replaced
front tires
STREET DEPT.
6 81 Ford DT
repaired complete rear end of dump
body and tailgate, service and
inspection
STREET DEPT.
5
13
35
10
83 Ford DT repaired dump body
78 Chev. DT repaired dump body corners
82 Ford Boom Truck installed 3 new batteries,
isolated short in electrical system
installed new alternator
920 cat loader installed new strobe light
SEWER & WATER DEPT.
85 Chev. PU
11
15
87 Chev. PU
73 Chev. DT
16
89 Chev. S-lO
service and inspection, install
new fuel tank
repaired flat
installed dump body box liner,
service and inspection
two snow tires
MEMORANDUM
DA TE:
November 3, 1989
'FO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff
Jan Bertrand, Building Official ?~
October I989 Monthly Report
STAFFING
During the month of October we had 22 working days. Peggy James
took I Oay of sick leave. The Inspection/ Planning Department
had two Planning Commission meetings on October 9th and October
23rd. Peggy James attended one Park Commission meeting on Oc-
tober 12th and both Planning Commission Meetings.
INSPECTIONS
The following inspections were conducted during the month of
October:
Site Inspections 47
Footing Inspections 20
Framing Inspections 23
Insulation Inspections 6
Drywall Inspections lO
Final Inspections 114
Progress Inspections 36
Erosion/Grading Inspections 0
House Moving/Demolition 1
Heating Inspections 19
Plumbing inspections 9
Fire Sprinklers/Fire Code 5
Complaints 18
TOTAL 308
The above list does not include 4 inspections made by the sub-
stitute inspector, site inspections by dune. Hyland, electrical
inspections, and inspections completed by the Plumbing inspector.
October 198g Monthly Report
Planning & Inspections
Page Two
REPORTS AND PLAN REVIEWS
There were ? plan reviews completed during October. The monthly
report for September was submitted to the City Manager. Reports
were submitted to the Planning Commission, City Council, normal
correspondence, and inspection notices. There were 17 notices
sent out during the month for exterior storage removal, building
code corrections, home occupations, and/or zoning code enforce-
ment. A report was submitted to the City Manager and Park Direc-
tor on the status of the Mound Depot and needed improvements.
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission forwarded two variances, one house
moving, and a recommendation for public works materials storage
to the City Council. The Planning Commission training meeting of
October 23rd was postponed until November. The 1989 Planning
Commission Recognition Dinner was held on October 21st. The Com-
missioners received Certificate of Awards for their years of
service.
LEGAL STATUS
During October, two formal complaints were requested from the
City Attorney to owners at 2640 Shannon Lane and 4408 Denbigh
Road. The City Attorney reviewed the status of several pending
cases before the courts during the month. Curt Pearson wrote a
resolution for denial of a variance at 4861 Hanover Road. I took
two trips to the Court Services office. [ wrote Curt a letter to
research amending the Fence ordinance relating to fencing hot
tubs and Fence height.
TRAINING/MEETINGS
! attended the Planning Commission Recognition Dinner, two Plan-
ning Commission meetings, and the regular staff meeting during
the month. I met with Jim Fackler regarding possible Mound Depot
improvements, dead tree removal on vacant property off of Eagle
Lane, and Highland Court construction within the Cobblestone Cove
scenic easement.
I met with Al Toliakson, the electrical inspector, and Jerry Babb
regarding wiring installation of hot tubs and hot tub Fires,
respectively.
I attended the Medina Inspector's Luncheon and the North Star
Chapter of Building Officials meeting in South St. Paul during
October. The topics discussed, other than regular business, was
fire sprinkler installations and related code changes to N.F.P.A
13, 13D & 13R.
October 1989 Monthly Report
Planning & Inspections
Page Three
gltY EQUIPMENT & PURCHASES
The City vehicle required the three gasoline Fills during the
month of October and a car wash.
STATISTICS OF ACTIVITIES
The total number o¢ building permits issued in the month of Oc-
tober was 39 with a total valuation of $443,488. The valuation
Figures are attached on the building activity report For October.
In addition, Peggy has arranged appointments for the building and
plumbing inspections. She has prepared the Planning Commission
agenda and minutes, the Park Commission agenda and minutes,
issued building, plumbing and heating permits, and typed cor-
respondence for the Building Official and Park Director. She has
compiled month-end reports for building activities, Sewer
Availability Charge, and U.S. Census Report.
' Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commis-
sion requests and requirements, site inspections for Flood plain
verification, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as
no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance
notices, review status of various sites for the city prosecutor,
preconstruction meetings at the site for building permit applica-
tions or realtors, Fire damage and periodic commercial inspection
updates.
** The heating inspections during the construction of a project
are included under the framing and final inspection of the build-
ing. The heating installations mentioned are for separate equip-
ment being placed in homes and businesses.
Cl TY OF HOUND
5,~41 Naywood Road
Nound, NN 5§.,x64
~ Oct, obe.~ · ~ 1989
ism P~e~&
~ o,. decks/remg~q
NON-~E$1C)EN?IAL ADOf-
TION$ & ALTER&TION$
17,240
33,450
173~418
224,108
85,000
4b~,Zb~
'21 I 227,983
15,400
172 I 564,810
223 I 1,261,456
TOTAL
CITY of MOUND
534! MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364
,(12! 472-t "55
November 6, 19898
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
OCTOBER MONTHLY REPORT
The City Council had 2 regular meetings with 2 ordinances and 15
resolutions. There was Agenda preparation and items to clear up
after each meeting.
The Mound City Code of Ordinances was updated to include all but
the last ordinance passed at the October 24th meeting. These
changes were given to everyone.
All the license application forms have been updated and put on
the computer.
Linda and I have been indexing all the old resolutions in
preparation for them to be microfilmed sometime in the future.
This is a time consuming job but one that needs to be done before
microfilming to make it easier to find things. Resolutions have
only been indexed by subject since the early 1980's so all the
old ones need to be done.
There has been some pre-census information sent to us that needed
to be confirmed and sent back to the census bureau.
There were a number of calls on the cemetery, staking for grave
markers, and deaths.
I am continuing to work on the Police Department Manual, when
time permits.
There were the usual calls and questions from the public.
fc
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612/ 472-1!55
NOVEMBER
TO:
FROM:
RE:
9, 1989
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR''~-~°-
OCTOBER FINANCE REPORT
GFOA CONFERENCE
The Minnesota Government Finance Officers had their annual
conference during October. I was the chairperson for this year's
conference. We had a record of 218 registrants at the
conference. The conference was a huge success. I heard many
comments that this year's confenence was the best one ever. We
had sessions on the special session legislation, the future of
tax increment financing, investing in the 1990's, performance
evaluations and many others.
The entire conference process was a rewarding and valuable
experience for me. I would like to thank the finance staff for
their help during the planning process. I would especially like
to thank Linda for her ideas and help on the conference.
INVESTMENTS
Balance 10-1-89
$8,542,209
Bought:
CP 8.6 Due 1-12-90 Dain 122,336
FNMA 8.2 Due 6-29-90 Shearson 245,986
Tr. Receipt 8.15 Due 11-15-90 Dain 240,019
Matured:
Repo 9.1 Marquette (200,000)
CP 8.7 Dain (189,032)
CP 8.7 Marquette ~
Balance 10-31-89 $8,467,696
JN:ls
CIT ' ()fNI)
OCTOBER 1989 MONTHLY REPORT
PARK DEPARTMENT
Parks
The improvements at Pembroke Park are complete except for the in-
stallation of a couple of fence sections and grass seed which
will be planted in the spring. In all, the park looks nice, but
we have already had one cross section of the fence broken by van-
dalism.
With the work done at Pembroke, we have resumed making signs for
the Parks. Signs for Swenson Park, Chester Park, and Highland
Park have been installed, the balance of the park signs have been
constructed, however, will not be installed until next spring.
In addition, posts have been installed at Chester Park to deter
cars and trucks from crossing the park.
Currently, Park Department staff consists of two people, one
seasonal maintenance worker and myself. The maintenance help
will terminate November llth.
Trees
During October three trees were removed from City Property, and
there was brush removed and trimming at three other areas. One
other tree is marked for removal, however will not be removed un-
til this winter so we can use the ice for access.
Two notices were sent for forced tree removal; one private
residence had two trees removed under Forced removal.
COR~TIOnS
With the lake level being down, the process of storing docks on
commons has been easy for the dock holders. A Final inspection
of all areas will be done in late November.
Cemeter%
The fall pick-up of leaves has been done. Two signs have been
ordered which will list the cemetery sections, however, the signs
will not be installed until next spring.
pJ
DRXLLS & )',/L~I~"E~(AIICE FXRE &
'~. ~s~ ~ ~ .~ /~ ~ ~ 6.00
C. ~ERSON '/ / ~ /~- ~ 2~ 6.00
~ ~AS'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~F~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ .... /~,~ _ __
S. ERICKS0~ / / ~ /~-- ~ Y~ g/ 6.00 /~
c. ~ERSO~ ~ ~ / ~.~d ~ /~ 6 nn
J. ~S , ~ / ~ N' ~ /9 6.00 //~
.. ~so..' ~ ~ A ./F- a .~J 6.oo /~
~. SAVAGE 1/ / ~ lq' ~/~ /~ K.nn //,~
,. S~*T.T.,,~ ff ~ ~ , lq - ~ . /~ ~.00 /~
~. FZS[ /- ~ ~ /~- ~ ~ ~.'00 /~,~
C. ~R ~ ~ / F~ P 2~ ~.00 /Z~,
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
THIS LAST THIS YEAR lAST YEAR
NO. OF CALLS
EHERGENCY
M'TON~ BEACH - FIRE
EMERGENCY
MINNETRISTA - F~RE
EMERGENCY
ORONO - FIRE
EMERGENCY
SHOREWOOD - FIRE
EMERGENCY
SP~N~ .A.~ - F~
EMERGENCY
HUTUAL AiD - F~E
EMERGENCY
TOTA~ F~RE CA~S
co~EemcA~
eES~OENTmA~
mNOUST~mA~
~UTO
F~SE ALA~'
~0. OF HOURS - .OUNO FIR~
EMERGENCY
- HT~ eCH
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
EMERGENCY
- ORONO
TOTAL
- SHORE~OOD FIRE
TOTAL
-SP. PARK FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAC
-MUTUAC A~D F~E
~M,ERGENCY
TOTA~
TOT~ ~,c~ .ou~s
TOTAL EtIEEGEtlCY HOURS
TOTAL FIRE HOURS
TOT~C ~ ~ E~E~CY HOURS
~L'TL:L :ID RECEIVED
MOUND VQLUNT~ER FIRE P~
MOUND, MINNESOTA
Date: //c~'/~-' - ~ 2
DRILL
REPORT
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of Fires
Pre-Plaining and Inspections
Tools & Apparatus
Identifying
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First Aid and Rescue
Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
Time
-~ ~/~
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams & Friction
Loss
House Burnings
Natural & Propane Gas
talk & Demonstrations
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzle & Hose Alliance
Inhalator Operation
Note:
Hourse Training.Paid
~ Excused ~ Unexcused
Q Present, Not paid
~;/>-J. Andersen
.G. Anderson
J. Babb
C. Baker
~/~-J. Beauchamp
~_~..~ D. Boyd
D.
~/~9//~ S' Bryce
Bryce
D. Carlson
~: Case¥
.. Collins
~//~ M. David
~11)_ B. Erickson
~- S. Erickson
D~/~ P. Fisk
~'/~ J. Oarvais
~?_~K. Grad¥
P Hen~
~- C Henderson
G. Johnson
B. Landsman
R. ~arsehke
J. Nafus
~- B. Niccum
~/~- M. Nelson
A. Opitz
O. Palm
M. Palm
D~/,L T. Palm
~'~ G. Pederson
~' ~ T. Rasmussen
. .~M. Savage
- R. Stallman
T. Swenson
~' ~ W. Swenson
~ ~ R. Williams
~ T. Williams
Drillmaster
MOUND VOLUNTEER F~RE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA
DRILL
REPORT
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of Fires
Pre-Plaining and Inspections
Tools & Apparatus
Identifying
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First Aid and Rescue
Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
Time Tim~
~1/~_ Pumper Operation ~l/D-
Fire Streams & Friction
Loss
House Burnings
Natural & Propane Gas
talk & Demonstrations
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzle & Hose Alliance
Inhalator Operation
Note: Hourse Training,Paid
~ Excused E Unexcused
Present, Not paid
~¥-~-- J. Andersen
.~::,}..'G. Anderson
a. Babb
C. Baker
J. Beauchamp
D. Boyd
D. Bryce
S. Bryce
D. Carlson
~7~_ j. Case¥
.__. S. Collins
"M. David
__~/~ B. Erickson~
S. Erickson
~l/~_p. Fisk
~-~ J Garvais
~ K. Grady
P. Henry
C Henderson
G Johnson
B~ Landsman
~_~-R Marschke
~'~ J Nafus
D'/~ B. Niccum
~;/~ M. Nelson
¢A. Opitz
G. Palm
~'/~ M. Palm
~'/~ T. Palm
~ G. Pederson
~8- T. Rasmussen
-~r~ M. Savage
~ R. Stallman
~ T. Swenson
~7~ W. Swenson
~_.~ R. Williams
T. Williams
'Dri~aster
DATE
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR ~ ~
MEN ON DUTY
~2 J. Andersen ~ M. Nelson
~ G. Anderson 0 A. Opitz
~ J. Babb O G. Palm
~ J. Beauchamp ~ m. Palm
~ D. Boyd ~ T. Palm
~ D. Bryce ~ G. Pederson
~ S. Bryce ~ T. Rasmussen
~ D. Carlson ~ M. Savage
~ J. Casey _~___ R. Stallman
///~ $. Collins ~ T. Swensen
~ M. David / W. Swensen
~//~ B. Erickson /~ R. Williams
~ S. Erickson ~2 T. Williams
~//~ K. Grady
/~ P. Henry
O C. Henderson
~/~ G. Johnson
~//-% B. Landsman
~ R. Marschke
~ J. Nafus
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 5536'"
d;2t 472--I 155
NOVEMBER 3, 1989
TO:
FROM:
CITY NANAGF-,R, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
~ I,/
mm, LIQUOR STO AC .R
OCTOBER 1989 REPORT
I was quite satisfied with October's sales results· In October of last
year, there was an extra Saturday that was not present in October of this
year, and yet we managed to produce $1,900 more in sales this October over
October of 1988. The customer count was rather pleasing also. We had 100
more customers this October than we had in October of 1988. Thus, for the
year gross sales total $785,968 compared to $774,183 at this time last
year.
What events occurred last month that were pertinent to our businses?
WARM, DRY WEATHER: Customers found it very pleasant to rake with
one hand while holding a beer in another. Perhaps the exceptional
riot of autumn colors this year stimulated the taste buds also.
HALLOWEEN MANIA: The major beer producers were very aggresive
with halloween promotions this year in an attempt to bolster
stagnant sales. The consensus is that halloween is fast becoming
a "mini holiday", an oasis between summer and Thanksgiving.
WORLD SERIES: Although the enthusiasm was not as great this year
as when the Twins were playing in 87, there still were plenty of
those basebll fanatics (those who could bear to listen to A1
Michaels) who enjoy the sport of consuming mass quantities of
beer while couch potatoing it.
On a more serious note, October is also "Employee Evaluation" time. I am
fortunate in my hectic schedule to have only one employee to evaluate.
Julie Clyne, my Assistant Manager, again performed exceptionally well over
the course of a year. Being a 15 year veteran of the Mound Liquor Store,
it has been dfficult at times to determine major goals for the ensuing
year. But Julie is a problem solver and has found a goal to pursue for
1990.
JK:ls
LAKE
402 EAST LAKE STREET
MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIC
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERS
JoEllen L Hurt, Chair
Orono
Thomas Reese. V~ce Chair
Mound
Jan $oswinkel, Secretary
Minnetonka Beach
Mark Westluncl, Treasurer
Wayzata
Marwn Bjorlin
Tonka Bay
David Cochran
Greenwood
Albert O, Foster
Deephaven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
Ron Kraemer
Spr~ng Park
JOhn Lewman
Minnetrlsta
John G. Malinka
Victoria
Robert K Pillsbury
Minnetonka
Rot)ert Rascop
S horev~:~l
Robert E. Slocum
Woodland
TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1989
FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: OCTOBER REPORT - LMCD
1. GENERAL INTEREST ITEMS.
1.1 Eurasion Watermilfoil Task Force,
Final season results arc as follows:
Acres harvested 675
Tons 3287
Operating Cost $170,000
Harvesters have been removed from thc water and are
being repaired and rctro-fittcd with improvement items by thc
manufacturer. They will be shrink wrapped and stored in thc
county maintenance yard in Spring Park.
Several meetings have bccn held planning for thc 1990
harvesting season. Numerous operational options are being
considered. Serious consideration is being given to having thc
LMCD operate thc program with thc continued and expanded
assistance from Hennepin County Public Works. A definitive
plan will bc presented at thc January meeting of the LMCD Board
of Directors.
1.2. Comprehensive Lake Management Plan
Work continued this month on the Intergovernmental
Relations portion of the plan. The future makeup of the board
membership was determined to be the same as at present, with 14
members, one each, appointed by the 14 cities, plus 4 added voting
members, one each from Hennepin County, Suburban Hennepin
Parks, the Watershed District, and Metro Council. This was
approved by a majority, but was not a consensus opinion. I feel
that this will not satisfy our oversight agencies as being regional
enough in makeup.
An all day session with key outside individuals, explaining
the total plan is scheduled for December 2nd.
2
1.3 Other General Interest Items.
Personal Use W~t~rgr~f~. A public hearing was held on
October 25th. The meeting was rather well attended, but was not
as spirited as some thought it might be.
Multiple Dock Moratorium, A group within the LMCD is
proposing that a moratorium be declared in issuance of licenses
for multiple docks, until such time as the comprehensive plan is
in place. The draft ordinance to this effect was tabled at the
Water Structures Committee. The moratorium is currently being
studied by a sub-committee. I opposed the ordinance because I
felt that it would be illegal, and could amount to a taking from
developers who presently have plans in progress, based on
compliance with existing regulations. A compromise position is
being sought.
2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS - MOUN1)
None
Mound Representative
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
TR:mac
cc. Gene Strommen
October 30, 1989
REGION~/B(~RD
Mears Pa~ Centre
230 East 5Ih Sffeet
St. Paul, Minnesota ,.~,101
6~2/292-8789
OCT
Ed Shukle
Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Boulevard
Mound MN ~
Dear Mr. Shukle:
The 1989 legislature created a new Regional Transit Board and changed the boundaries
of some of the districts. I have been selected to represent District F, western Anoka and
western Hennepin Counties. This is almost the same area I represented when I served
on the Metropolitan Transit Commission several years ago.
For those of you who don't know me, I'd like to tell you a little about my transit and local
government experience. I have been a city employee for twenty-eight years, the last
fifteen as Director of Accounting for Coon Rapids. I also served four years on the Anoka
City Council. I do believe I have a good feel for municipal government, and an
understanding of the concerns of local officials on transportation issues in the
metropolitan area. I served on the MTC for six years, two years as Vice Chairman, and I
have served on the RTB since it was created. I also serve as the RTB representative on
the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB).
There are many Important Issues facing the Regional Transit Board: improving transit in
the suburban area, looking at transit financing mechanisms, continuing to improve
transit for the elderly and disabled, and working with cities and counties on light rail transit
development. Your ideas and concerns are welcome and appreciated. I can be
reached at 755~2880 or 421-1213, also at 430 Rice Street, Anoka, MN 55303. If you would
like to discuss transit issues, please call me. I will also be happy to meet with you, or
attend meetings in your commune,.
I look forward to serving as your representative on the Regional Transit Board.
Sincerely,
Ruth Franklin
RTB Board Member
District F
RF/smf
An Equal Opportunity Employer
HINUTE$ OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COHHISSION
October Z3, 1989
Present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners Geoff Michael, Ken
Smith, Frank Weiland, William Thai, and Jerry Clapsaddle, Council
Representative Liz Jensen, Building Official Jan Bertrand, City
Manager Ed Shukle, City Planner Mark Koegler, City Engineer John
Cameron, and Secretary Peggy James.
The following citizens were also present: Greg Skinner, Geno
Hoff, Don Jerdee, Marcia Jerdee, Carol Carlson, D.J. Stahlbusch,
Connie Stahibusch, Pat Gray, Todd Gray, Han Waldenstrom, Dorene
Hanson, Karen King, Don Bryce, Pat Meisel, Kyle Wilberg, Mayor
Steve Smith, Connie Hanley, Fred Hanley, Keith Fish, Wilford Han-
son, Eldo Schmidt, Sandi Woytcke, and Ben Marks.
Chair Bill Meyer called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES:
MOTION made by Weiland seconded by Thai to approve the
Planning Commission Minutes of October 9, 1989 as writ-
ten. Notion carried unanimously.
BOARD C)F APPEALS:
Consideration of a Zoning Modification to allow Storage
Public Works Materials at the East and West sides of Ci~_~
Hail. PUBLIC HEARING.
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the background of possibly
having outside storage for public works materials at the east and
west sides of city hall. He explained that there are two
separate tasks which the Planning Commission needs to complete,
they are:
Issue #1: Provide a recommendation to the City Council on the
possibility of establishing outdoor storage areas to the east and
west of the city hall building.
!ss.u.e t~L~: Regardless of the Commission's recommendation on issue
#1 above, provide a recommended zoning modification to accom-
modate the outdoor storage at the city hall site.
Koegler reviewed Issue #1 first. He stated that the proposed
city hall site will accommodate only a portion of the city's to-
tal requirement for outside storage. Therefore, if the city
hall site is implemented, additional storage sites will still be
needed. In addition, he explained other problems with the site,
such as: setback requirements which would eliminate one of the
five bays as planned, the significant amount of grading needed,
removal of all existing vegetation, environmental concerns relat-
ing to drainage, and the cost.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1989
PaGe Two
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission determine that the
sites located both east and west of the existing city shall are
unsuitable for storage of public works materials. Factors in-
Fluencing this recommendation include the following:
The proposed use is inconsistent with city hall and the sur-
rounding wetland environment at Lost Lake due to the in-
ability of the sites to adequately handle on-site storm
drainage retention.
Both sites (and particularly the western site) are in-
herently unsuitable for the proposed use due to topography
and tree cover.
The cost of improvements to establish the two areas is not
justifiable since three other sites including Lost Lake will
still be needed to accommodate public works storage.
The Commission had no comments, therefore Chair Meyer opened the
public hearing.
The Following citizens spoke against having outside storage at
city hail: Don Jerdee, Dennis Stahibusch, Marcia derdee, Fred
Hanley, Connie Hanley, Ben Marks. Some of the comments made by
these citizens were: there is not enough space anyway, it is not
Feasible, the potential noise of the trucks next to residential
property, and the property is very beautiful with the trees now,
so why ruin it. It was noted that a ma.jority of the citizens
present were against the proposed site. No one spoke in favor of
having the outside storage at city hall·
The Bickman site and Lost Lake site were reviewed as potential
storage sites. No one spoke in opposition to having the
materials stored at Lost Lake.
Chair Meyer closed the public hearing.
MOTION made by Thai, seconded by Weiland, to recommend
to the City Counctl that the city hall site not be con-
sidered for the outdoor storage of public works
materials as the Planning Commission agrees with staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously.
Koegler reviewed his recommendation for Issue #2. He explained
that city hal I is currently zoned R-I. The only district
presently allowing any type of outdoor storage is the I-l, In-
dustrial district, which allows "storage of rock and stone
products" by conditional use. To be consistent with the intent
of the overall zoning code, staff feels that the B-! zone is the
potential vehicle for accommodating the proposed use.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1989
Page l'hree
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission find that if the
City Council eventually Finds that no other reasonable alterna-
tive to the city hall site exists for public works storage, the
B-I zoning district should be modified to allow "publicly owned
materials storage areas" as a conditional use. Performance
standards should also be developed to minimize the impact on the
surrounding properties and the natural environment.
The Com/nission noted that the Lost Lake property is zoned 8-1.
Koegler noted that the outside public storage use at the Lost
Lake site is currently a grandfathered use, however that use can-
not be intensified, it was also noted that the Bickn~an property
is B-I.
The Commission discussed rezoning city hall to B-l. Marcia
derdee, Connie Stahlbusch, and Carol Hanley stated that they
would rather not have city hall rezoned to B-I until after the B-
I zoning district is modified to allow outdoor storage of public
works m~terials.
The Commission asked For the City Planner's opinion on possibly
rezoning the city hall site to B-I. He suggested leaving city
hall zoned as R-I, the primary reason being the control of the
surrounding residents as they are aware of the uses allowed in a
residential Oistrict. If it is zoned B-I and in the Future
relocate city hail, they could sell the city hall building/
property to any business allowed within the B-I district, which
could open up a host of uses.
Chair Meyer closed the public hearing.
The Commission determined that the current R-I zoning for city
hall is sufficient, and that the B-I zoning district could be ex-
panded to allow open storage of public works materials as a con-
ditional use.
MOTION made by ~tth, seconded by Weiland, to recom~end
to the City Council that the city hall prc~erty not be
rezoned since the R-I zoning district is sufficient and
desirable for its present use. In addition, the City
Council should i o ok into expanding the B-I zoning dis-
trict to allow outdoor storage of public works materials
as a conditional use with performance standards to be
drafted. Motion carried unanimously.
These issues will be addressed by the City Council at their meet-
ing on November 28, 1989.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1989
Page Four
be
Creative Oevelopers? Duane Barth: 2920 Highland Court? Lot
2, Block 17 Cobblestone Cove, PIO ~23-117-24-41 0028.
Request to Build Deck within a Scenic Easement.
The Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the request to
build a deck within a Scenic Easement. She explained that Mr.
Barth, who was also the developer of the Cobblestone Cove sub-
division, obtained a building permit to construct a deck and
stairway to the lake. Upon her Final inspection of the dwelling,
she noticed that the stairway and the deck was being built within
the Scenic Easement. In the process of constructing the deck,
one dead tree was removed, and one live section of a Forked tree
was removed. The Scenic Easement was drafted to limit any
Oestruction of vegetation and/or limit development on the slope
to a four Foot stairway without City review and approval.
Staff recommended that the deck be removed as the slope should
remain Forested with very limited hard surface to deter erosion
of the slope as stated in City Code Section 23.711 relating to
Soil Erosion and Tree and Woodland Preservation.
Duane Barth, applicant and contractor, spoke on behalf of the
property owner. He s'tated that they have made every effort to
maintain the slope and prevent erosion as the owner wants to
protect his investment. He added that the owner wants to
preserve the hillstOe, and the owner has already invested $8,000
into the construction of the stairway and deck.
Mr. Gray, owner of 2920 Highland Court, commented that he did
have a professional landscape company, Aspen Landscaping, draw a
plan that would help preserve the slope; and this is the plan he
is Following. Aspen suggested removing the section of the live
tree since the tree had a few dead limbs and that section would
drain the nutrition from the other section which would then even-
tually die. He also stated that he had no knowledge that a
Scenic Easement existed, he has contacted his title company and
they are researching the issue. He said that the deck is com-
plete, except for the deck boards.
Mr. Gray added that his lot has 10,100 souare Feet, the Scenic
Easement is S,000 square Feet, therefore, the Scenic Easement is
49 percent of his lot. His house is 75 Feet From the lakeshore.
The Commission asked the City Planner's opinion on whether there
would be more erosion with a deck covering bare ground, or with
vegetation existing. He commented that a rock base could be
added under the deck and this would hold the slope as well as
natural vegetation. He also mentioned that the ground cover
could not be replaced between now and next spring.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1989
Page Five
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Michael to approve
construction of the deck as shown on Exhibit A upon the
condition that an erosion control measure, acceptable to
the city, be placed under the deck.
The Commission discussed the possibility of setting a precedence
to allow other decks'within the Scenic Easement. It was noted
that the Commission does not want this to happen. Mr. Gray
stated that vegetation still exists under the deck, and the way
it is constructed should allow enough sunlight under the deck to
promote growth of vegetation.
Motion carried 4 - 3.
Jensen, Smith, Michael.
Meyer.)
(Those in favor: Clapsaddle,
Those opposed: Thai, Weiland,
Weiland suggested that the Scenic Easement be mailed to all
owners of property within this subdivision so they are aware of
its presence, and hopefully will prevent this type of request in
the future. Thai commented that he does not think the deck is
necessary, adding that the owner could get by with a 48" wide
walkway. Heyer commented that he does not want to see decks con-
structed all along the slope and shoreline.
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 24, 1989.
Case No. 89-847: Mound Housinq & Redevelopment Authority,
2020 Commerce Blvd., Blocks l, 27 & 4, Misc. Lots, Lakeside
Park A.L. Crocker's, PID #13-117-24-32 0030. FENCE HEIGHT
VARIANCE.
Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the request for a two
foot fence height variance and explained the location of the
proposed fence. She noted that the police department has had 8
calls to the site (two of which had more than one victim) within
the last two years.
Staff recommended approval of the requested fence height variance
upon the condition that the fence remain an open type (see-
through) to alleviate a possible visibility problem when entering
the public right-of-way.
Sandi Woytcke commented that they have had vandalism in the park-
ing lot, such as: cars being scratched with keys, tires stolen,
a Volkswagon being picked-up and moved, potatoes in exhaust
pipes, etc.
The Commission discussed reasons why this fence height should be
allowed, and reviewed possible alternatives.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1989
Page Six
MOTION made by Meyer, seconded by Thai, to approve staff
recommendation for approval of the fence height variance
for the following reasons: to improve security for a
multi family senior housing unit with a history of van-
dalism, the street side fence is not on a main thorough-
fare, the fence would be in the middle of the parking
lot if placed at the required setback, a chain link
fence will be erected opposed to a privacy fence, and
the density of cars in the parking lot. Motion carried
unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on November 14, 1989.
DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONAL:
a. Review the Comprehensive Plan Draft.
The Commission determined that they would like to review the Com-
prehensive Plan when they have more time. The possibility of
holding a special meeting was considered and dissolved due to
schedule conflicts, it was determined that staff is to keep the
November 27th agenda free of all items except the Comprehensive
Plan. It was suggested that interviews for openings on the Plan-
ning Commission be held on November I3th, beginning at 6:30 p.m.
Discussion pertaining to the Fence Ordinance as it relates
to the requirement to enclose swimming pools by a protective
fence~, and how this would relate to hot tubs more than two
feet dee~
The Building Official, Jan Bertrand, explained the reason that
this issue is being addressed. She reviewed the codes from a few
other cities and pointed out differences.. She suggested, if
there was a 150 square foot minimum, this could alleviate inter-
pretation problems.
Thai believes that the hot tubs should have covers with a lock to
ensure that nothing or anybody fails into them. Clapsaddle com-
mented that he does not believe a surround at the property line
is a deterrent.
The Building Official asked the Commission if hot tubs should
comply with the regulations as outlined in Section 23.604.4, Page
3lA, as written.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 22, lgag
Page Seven
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Michael to interpret
Section 23.604.4, Page 3lA of the Zoning Code, not to
include hot tubs. Hot tubs do not need to comply with
the regulations outlined for swimming pools, in addi-
tion, staff is to return with some recommendations for
guidelines for hot tubs. Motion carried 4 - 3. (Those
in favor: Ciapsaddle, Meyer, Smith and Michael. Those
Opl::~)sed: Thai, Jensen, and Weiland.)
Jensen stated her reason for opposing is that she believes the
ordinance, as written, does include hot tubs, however she does
want the issue researched. Thai stated that he would like to
have more information and a recommendation given pertaining to
hot tubs before he decides that they should not com~ly with Sec-
tion 23.604.4. Weiland agreed with Thai.
c. City Council Representative Report.
Council Representative Jensen stated that there was nothing to
report From the last Council meeting of October 9th. However,
she reviewed several items discussed at the Committee of the
Whole meeting on October l?th. One item of discussion pertained
to a policy For the expiration and re-appointment o¢ terms For
Planning and Park Commissioners.
MOTION made by Meyer, seconded by Smith to adjourn the
meeting at 10:40 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING
MA~ 17, 1989
The meeting was called to at 7:45 at the offices of C.R.
Manufacturing in Mound. The meeting was held here due to the
fact that the city hall air conditioning was not working.
City Manager, Ed Shukle, introduced the members of the commission
to each other. He then indicated that the meeting was strictly
to be organizational. He started out by reviewing the Economic
Development Commission Ordinance, past efforts on economic
development, budget, work of the Hennepin County Economic
Development Consortium, Lost Lake, and the upcoming National
League of Cities Seminar.
Discussion was held on the election of a chairperson and vice
chairperson. Judy Marshik and Paul Meisel were selected
Chairperson and Vice Chairperson respectively.
The regular meeting schedule was discussed. The group decided on
a 7 AM meeting every second Tuesday, with the first meeting to be
held on June 13, 1989.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:00 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Ed Shukl e
City Manager
ES:is
MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
JUNE 13, 1989
The meetinE was called to order at ?:00 AM. Members present:
Judy Marshik, Mark Brewer, Paul Meisel, Fred Guttormson, Chic
Remien, and Mayor Steve Smith. Absent: Tim Kene@ly. Also
present: City ManaEer, Ed Shukle and Finance Director, John
Norman.
Upon motion by Brewer, seconded by Guttormson and carried
unanimously, the minutes of the May 17, 1989 meeting were
approved.
A brief discussion was held on the materials distributed at the
May 17th meeting and materials mailed the week of June 5th. It
was the consensus to move on into the agenda to discuss Mission
Statement and related topics. City Manager Ed Shukle pointed to
Exhibit "K" of a report to the Economic Development Task Force,
"A Stratgey for Economic Development", dated October 1988. This
was prepared by Ed Shukle, City Manager. Exhibit "K" referenced
the Mission Statement and a sample work plan that was developed
by Business Development Services (BDS). It listed the Mission
Statement as well as various elements or tasks that could be
completed. Discussion was held with regard to these elements.
Consensus was reached on certain resources that needed to be
investigated. These resources were:
A map of commercial buildings and property and
relationship to their zoning.
A building inventory that looked at the general
condition of buildings and building ownership·
A community profile that would take some of the key
pieces of information that have been previously
distributed through reports submitted by the City
Manager and BDS.
"Dove Tailing" the Hennepin County Economic Consortium's
Executive Call Program.
5. Analyze what neighboring cities have with regard to
economic development and market potential.
A motion made by Brewer to adopt the BDS elliptical trade area.
The motion failed for lack of a second· It was the consensus to
try to define this elliptical trade area more clearly at the next
meeting·
It was a consensus to set the timetables on these research items
at the next meeting. It was also the consensus to basically
devote the agenda at the next meeting to these items.
The Commission aiso discussed measures of success as they pertain
to Section 260:05 of the City Code relating to "purpose" of the
Economic Development Commission. Those measures of success are:
1. Establish a "Pull Factor"
2. Total number of jobs
3. Commercial tax base
4. Business volume
5. Employee base
6. Commercial building inventory
7. Community aesthetics
It was then moved by Brewer, seconded by Guttormson and carried
unanimously to adopt these measures of success for the
Commission.
Discussion was also held on the seminar for advisory commissions
to be held on June 22nd at Brooklyn Park. Marshik, Meisel and
Brewer indicated that they wish to attend.
The next meeting was set for Thursday, July 6, 1989 at 7 AM in
the Council Chambers.
Upon motion by Brewer, seconded by Remien and carried
unanimously, the meeting was adjourned.
ect fully,/submit ted,
City Manager
ES:is
MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
JULY 6, 1989
The meeting was called to order at 7 AM, in the City Council
Chambers. Members present: Marshik, Guttormson, Meisel, Remien.
Absent: Brewer, Kenealy. Also present: City Manager Ed Shukle
and Finance Director John Norman. '
The minutes of the June 13, 1989 meeting were reviewed. Upon
motion by Guttormson, seconded by Remien, and carried
unanimously, the minutes of the June 13, 1989 meeting were
approved with an amendment indicating that the mission statement
as stated in Exhibit "K" of the BDS material, was also approved
at the June 13th meeting.
Items from the June 13, 1989 meeting were reviewed:
1) A map of commercial buildings and property and relationships
to their zoning. City Manager Ed Shukle indicated that such a
map was not available and it would be difficult to prepare one.
2) Building inventory that looked at the general conditions of
buildings and building ownership.
3) Community profile that would take some of the key pieces of
information that had been previously distributed. Chairperson
Marshik indicated she would talk to Tim Kenealy regarding this
information.
4) "Dovetailing, the Hennepin County Economic Development
Consortium,s Executive Call Program. Chic Remien provided the
final draft of the survey to be used by the consortium. She also
indicated she would get a business list to the Chairperson.
5) Analyze what neighboring cities have with regard to economic
development and market potential. It was discussed that the
cities of Wayzata, Excelsior, Maple Plain, Chanhassen, Waconia,
Chaska, Delano and Watertown ought to be contacted in August or
September with regard to these issues.
With regard to building inventory, it was the consensus to have
each member take parts of the downtown area and list building,
its address, a description of the building, and the owners name
if possible. Paul Meisel was to take the area on the west side
of Commerce Blvd. from Our Lady of the Lake Church to the Huber
Funeral Home. Judy Marshik. was to take the east side of Commerce
Blvd., Fred Guttormson was to take the north side of Shoreline
Drive, Chic Remien was to take the south side of Shoreline Drive
and Wilshire Blvd.
The next meeting was scheduled for Thursday, July 27, 1989, at 7
AM in the City Council Chambers.
Upon motion by Meisel, seconded by Remien,
unanimously, the meeting was adjourned.
and carried
~submitted,
Ed Shukle
City Manager
ES:is
HINUTES
ECONO~[IC DEVELO?~ENT
JUL~ 27,.1989
The meeting was called to order at 7 AM in the City Council
Chambers. Members present: Judy Marshik, Mayor Smith, Mark
Brewer, Chic Remien, Fred Guttormson, Tim Kenealy. Absent:
none. Also present: John Norman, Finance Director and Ed
Shukle, City Manager.
Upon motion by Remien, seconded by Guttormson, and carried
unanimously, the Minutes of the July 6, 1989 meeting were
approved.
A review of the items from the July 6th meeting occurred. Those
items were: building inventory, community profile and executive
call program. Information was distributed from each member on
the business inventory item. Tim Kenealy also presented a
community profile which was a summary of information that had
gathered from previous reports developed by Business Development
Services and others. The majority of the time was spent on the
executive call program. Assignments were given to each member
and ex-officio non-voting members. A business interview
questionnaire was reviewed and Chairperson Marshik indicated that
she would revise it and have it sent to City Hall where it could
be distributed to the Commission. It was the consensus to have
the interviews conducted during the month of August' with a
meeting scheduled for September 14, 1989, 7 AM, City Council
Chambers to review the interviews that each member conducted.
There being no further business, upon motion by Brewer, seconded
by Guttormson, and carried unanimously, the meeting was
adjourned.
Re_~qect. fully su. bmitted,
City Manager
ES:ls-
ECONOI~C DEVEL~)PI~,NT COI~i~SSION
SEPTEI'fBE~ 13, 1989
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 AM in the City Council Chambers.
Members present: ¥ice Chair Paul Meisel, Chic Remien, Tim Kenealy, Fred
Guttormson and Mark Brewer. Absent: Hayor Steve Smith. Also present:
Finance Director John Norman, City Manager Ed Shukle.
Upon motion by Guttormson, seconded by Brewer, and carried unanimously, the
minutes of the July 27, 1989 meeting were approved.
A brief discussion was held on the resignation of Judy Marshik from the
Economic Development Commission. ~he submitted a letter indicating the
change of jobs and personal reasons why she was resigning. Briefly
discussed vas the vacancy and how it would be filled. City Manager Ed
Shukle suggested that he discuss this with the City Council at its
Committee of the ~nole meeting on September 19th. It was the consensus of
the EDC that someone be appointed to that post aa soon as poss£ble. It vas
also requested that Judy be contacted to return to the City the information
that has already been distributed to her or that she has collected from
seminars she has attended on behalf of the City. The City Manager
indicated he would contact her regarding this information.
Discussion vas then held on the business interviews that have taken place
over the last month to month and one half. The issue of compiling the
surveys was discussed. Paul Meisel indicated that he could have someone
manually compile it. The consensus vas to have this done and ready for the
next meeting. Discussion was held on the questions and some of the
responses that were received. Some of the members indicated that they had
not completed the surveys with the businesses that they interviewed and
they would have these completed by the end of next week. The City Manager
was also to contact Mayor Smith who was not at the meeting regarding his
surveys and completion.
Also discussed vas the future direction of the Committee. It was the
consensus to have each member bring back some possible questions that could
be put together in a brief community wide survey. The City Manager
indicated that he could contact some cities that have done this to see what
type of information was considered within the surveys that had been
conducted by those cities. He was also aware of a private firm that
perf6rms surveys of this type. He viii make contact with both the cities
and the private firm.
Also discussed was the development of a brochure for the
was something the Committee would like to do but at a later date.
That
Also discussed was the development of a map showing the buildings in Mound
with property valuations and square footages. Chic Remien is to get the
list of buildings put together so that city staff can insert the property
valuations and other information.
MINUTES
ECONOMI~ DEYELOPMENT ~OMMIS$ION
The next meeting vas scheduled for Tuesday, October 3, 1989, at 7 AM in the
¢£ty Council Chambers. The agenda viii include a discussion ou the
business surveys results as compiled by Paul Melsel and discussion about
questions that could be inserted into a community vide survey.
Upon motion by Brever, seconded by Cuttormson, and carried unanimously, the
meeting vas adjourned at 8:10 AM.
Respectfully submitted,
City Manager
ES: Is
2
HINUTES
BCONOHXC DEVELOPHENT COIOiISSION
OCTOBER 3, 1989
The meeting was called to order at 7 AH. Members
Kenealy, Guttormson, Remien, Brewer. Absent: Smith.
Manager Ed Shukle and Finance Director John Norman.
present: Meisel,
Also present: City
Upon motion by Kenealy, seconded by Cuttormson and carried unanimously, the
minutes of the September 13, 1989 meeting were approved.
Ed Shukle, City Manager reported on the status of the vacancy on the
Commission. He indicated that the City Council had agreed with the
Commission's recommendation to replace someone as soon as possible. He
also indicated that the position was advertised in the newspaper and
applications will be accepted until October llth.
The compilation of the survey done with local businesses was discussed.
Chairman Paul Meisel vent through the recap of the survey with the
Commission. Consensus was to have the survey results reproduced and that
they be mailed out for discussion at the next meeting. Subsequently, a
news release viii be written by the Chairman that wiI1 be published in
local and area newspapers.
The community wide survey was discussed. The City Manager presented
samples of metro area cities and what they have done with regard to the
subject. He discussed a consultant who could perform random telephone
surveys and also presented a copy of a survey used by the city of North St.
Paul that that city mailed to its residents. A subcommittee of Paul
Meisel, John Norman and Hark Brewer was established to get together to
develop some questions that could be used in a community wide survey. The
survey could possibly be included in the next issue of City Contact, the
City of Mound's newsletter. A report will be given by the subcommittee at
the next meeting.
The building inventory map was discussed. It was the consensus to have the
work that had been started to be completed by the next meeting.
There being no other business, the next meeting was established for
Thursday, October 26, 1989 at 7 AH in the Council Chambers. Subsequent
meetings of the Commission will be held on the third Thursday of each month
beginning at 7 AM, i.e. the first meeting of November will be November
16th.
Upon motion by Guttormson, seconded by Brewer, and carried unanimously, the
meeting was adjourned at 8:40 AH.
Respectfully submitS,
ES:ls
MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COHMI SSION
O~TOBF.~ 26 ~ 1
The meeting was called to order at 7 AM. Members present: Meisel, Kenealy
Guttormson, Brewer, Remien, Smith. Absent: None. Also present: City
Manager Ed Shukle.
Upon motion by Guttormson, seconded by Remien, and carried unanimously, the
Minutes of the October 3, 1989 meeting were approved.
The member vacancy was discussed. It was moved by Remien, seconded by
Brewer and carried unanimously to interview the three candidates that have
applied for the vacancy. It is to be advertised again in the newspaper
prior to the interview date of November 14, 1989 at 7 PM, City Hall,
preceding the regular City Council meeting. It was also suggested that a
list of questions be provided to the Commission.
A brief discussion was held on the first survey done by the Commission. It
was agreed that this be set aside for the time being. The remainder of the
meeting was spent on discussing a community wide survey. Ed Shukle
indicated that the City Council was planning to do two surveys. One was to
be a small survey that persons doing business at city hall could complete
while here. The other survey would involve sending something out in the
quarterly newsletter. It was suggested that the latter survey be combined
with the Economic Development Commission's survey with regard to the
community similar to the City of North St. Paul's example discussed
previously.
Paul Meisel, Mark Brewer and John Norman had met prior to this meeting to
develop a survey. Chairperson Meisel discussed this survey and the results
of it being done on a sample type basis with his employees in his firm.
Some revisions were made. It was agreed that the sub-committee meet again
on November 6, 1989, at noon at the Country Kitchen, to draft a revised
survey that would be discussed at the next regular meeting of the
Commission on November 16th, and recommended to the City Council at its
Committee of the Whole meeting on November 21st.
The building inventory map was briefly discussed. Chic was asked to have a
master list ready for the next meeting.
Mark Brewer brought up under "Other Business" how the Westonka area is
affected by duplication of efforts in various activities. It was his
intent to "plant the seed" for discussing annexation and or consolidation
of cities and other types of services. This matter will be discussed
further at the next meeting.
Economic Development Commission Minutes
October 26, 1989
Page 2
The next meeting is scheduled for the third Thursday of November 16th, 7 AM
in the City Council Chambers.
Upon motion by Brewer, seconded by Guttormson, and carried unanimously, the
meeting was adjourned at 8:30 AM.
City Manager
AGENDA
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NOVEMBER 13, 1989
7:00 PM .... CITY HALL
1. ~_RV~W_S_ FO__R V_A~_ANCIE~, O__N T~__E p~A_N_N~N__G COM__M_~SI~I
a. William (Bill) Voss, 4619 Kildare Road ·
b. Terrence (Terry) Selle, 2675 Westedae Blvd. t
Planning :ommis-
sion Minutes.
3. BOARD OF' APPEALS= 7:30 PM
Bruce McComb, Request to Move a house From 3005 Brigh-
ton Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road. PUBLIC HEARING.
be
Michael Martlnson, 5918 Lynwood Blvd., Part of Lots 9 &
10, Koehler's 2nd Addition, PID #14-117-24-42 0018.
SETBACK VARIANCE,
4. DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONAL:
Final review of memo to be sent to City Council regard-
ing Housing Maintenance/Truth in Housing.
b. City Council Representative Report.
c. City Council Minutes of October 24, 1989.
"The Planning Commission ls an advisory body to the City Council.
One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings and
make recommendations to the Ctty Counctl. The City Council makes
all Final decisions on these matters.
Mound City Ordinances require that certain documents and informa-
tion be included in applications. The Planning Commission may
postpone consideration of an application that Is incomplete and
may For other reasons postpone Final action on an application.
For each agenda item the Commission will receive reports prepared
by the City Staff, open the hearing to the public, and Qiscuss
the act on the application."
~ SISP ~. ? .lgSg
PO Box
l'10und MN
City Manager
City of Mound
5341Mavwood
Mound MN
55364
OCT 1 3 lg~§
i am interested in learnins more about the
ECONOMIC DEVELOPHENT COMMiSSiON. i would like
to discuss duties and responsibilities.
to meet with you
I have Baccalaureate and Master's [,ezrees from the University of
Minnesota. I have more than £0 years of experience as ~ pubiic
schooi administrator. I have owned mY own business in another
citY. I have lived in Mound for approximately 5 years.
If 'cpu think I mizht qualify for the ~osition. please feel free
to call me at ~Y£-£67Z. Thank YOU for Your consideration.
SincerelY,
Caroline Bunker Rosdahi
Name:
Residence Address:
Age:
Family:
Education:
~.bjor:
Minor:
Employer:
Position:
Qualifications:
Ben r~rks
2465 Lost Lake Road
Mound, MN 55364
28
Theresa - wife, age 28
Adam - son, age 2 days
St. Cloud State University
Finance
Construction Management
Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.
319 Barry Ave. S. Suite 200
Wayzata, MN 55391
Assistant Vice President - Investment Broker
Resident of Mound
Plan tn live in area for several years
Starting family, concerned about quality of
life and education in community
Grew up in small community
Familiar with many types of construction, useful
in analyzing building permits and variances.
Knowledgeable in methods of public financing,
would provide useful input for municipal bond
issues, etc.
Concerned and active citizen
PARTY <<< >>> PARTY <<< >>> PARTY
FOR ALL CITY EI'fPLOYEES
CHRI STI~S PARTY
SATURDAY, DECEHBER 2, 1989
AT THE HOUND V'FI/
8:00
HORS D*OEUVRES AND CASH BAR
SEE YOU THEREII
R.S.V.P. TO LINDA BY 11-27
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
473-7033 R[C"IJ NOV 9 ~98.q
L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE
November & December 1989
Wednesday
Friday
Saturday
Monday
Thursday
Saturday
Wednesday
W.mdnesday
11-08-89
11-17-89
11-18-89
11-27-89
11-30-89
12-02-89
12-06-89
12-13-89
Advisory Committee, Management plan
7:00 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall
EWM Task Force
8:30 a.m. Freshwater Foundation, Navarre
Water Structures & Environment Committee
7:30 a.m. LMCD Office, Wayzata
Lake Use Committee
4:30 p.m. LMCD Office, Wayzata
Intergovernmental/Funding Advisory Subcommittee
7:00 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall
Management Plan Overview - Invited public officials
and agency personnel
7:30 a.m. Lafayette Club
7:30 p.m., Regular Meeting, LMCD Board of Directors
Tonka Bay City Hall
Advisory Committee, Management Plan
7:00 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall
10-24-89
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
I"~)UND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 9, 1989
Present were: Chair Marilvn Bvrnes, Commissioners Neil Weber.
Tom Casey, Steve Burke. Shirley AnOersen, Nancy Clough anO Brian
Asleson; Counci I Representative Phyllis dessert: Park Director Jim
Fackler; City Manager, Ed Shukle, Dock inspector, Dell Rudolph,
and Secretary Peoov James. Absent and excused was: Commissioner
Cathy Baily.
The Following citizens were also in attendance: Janet Johnson,
~rian Johnson, Mark Schiel, Jim Ostman, Kay Ostman, Bryan Clem,
Paul Glynn, Donna E~sthouse, Gayle Grady, Skip Johnson, Harvey
Reder, Carolyn SFhmidt, Cliff Schmidt, Ron Jonnson, Jim GraOy,
Doug Easthouse, Gert GerolO, Don Henry, Claudia Henry, Ken
Hasselfeldt.
Chair Byrnes called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Minutes
The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of October 12, i989
were presented for changes and/or additions.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Asleson to approve
the Park Commission Minutes of October IZ, 1989 as writ-
ten. Motion carried unanimously.
1990 Dock Location Ma.E
The Park Director, Jim Fackler, reported that there are no
changes being proposed from the 1989 map. He surmised that there
are 443 dock sites listed on the maD, however only 360 of these
sites will be usable in 1990 due 'to the Iow water level. FacKler
also revieweO the number of Oocks located on City parks.
Chair Byrnes askeO the citizens present if anyone wished to speak
on the issue. Gert Gerold of 4600 Manchester Road ouestioned if
docks could be installed on the property Dy the Black Lake
briOge. Fackler explained that this property is either County or
privately owned.
Ron Johnson of 4416 Dorchester Road questioned why there was ever
a problem with the docks being located at Avalon Park. Chair
Byrnes explained the history o¢ the Avalon dock issue. Council-
member Skip Johnson asked to speak on the issue of Avalon Park.
Skip explained that he raised the issue at a council meeting
since he was aware at one time that the park was owned by an as-
sociation and they did not want docks at the park. Johnson ex-
plained that when the area was used as a swimming beach it had a
nice sand bottom, however, lack oF use and dredging From Goose
Park Commission Minutes
November 9, 1~89
Page Two
Island has destroyed the sand bottom which is now covered with 8
soot type material. He stated that the docks dominate the mare
and have changed the usage of the park. Jonnson added that after
the docks were installed at Avalon, lO0 people signed a petition
to remove tr~e docks and limit the use of the park. Bryan Clem of
4464 Manchester confirmed that there was a petition dated May 4,
1982 and it did have lO0 signatures on it.
Gert Gerold stateO that she uses Avalon park, however does not
have a dock or a boat. She has a day care with twelve children
and would like to see a bench or picnic table and some playground
equipment at the park. She stated that the kids walk on the
docks because their is nothing else to do at the park. She added
that the docks are not a problems, however, the park needs equip-
ment.
Fackler informed the Commission that there is a very Iow turnover
rate For the dock t~olders at Avalon, there is a limited amount of
dock space available for non-abutting property owners on the is-
land.
Ron Johnson added that it woulO be nice to have a picnic table or
bench at the park. He also ouestioned if the well could be made
usable again, he believes the casing is still there.
Cliff $chmidt of 3001 Island View Drive stated that the docks are
dangerous For the kids. Jim Ostman of 2945 Island View Drive
stated that the older kids Fish From the docks.
Chair Byrnes read a letter written by Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspec-
tor, recommending that the Oocks remain at Avalon Park.
Donna Easthouse of 3042 Island View Drive stated that she helped
walk the petition in 1982 and would prefer to see Avalon Park
used For a swimming beach.
Weber questioned Fackler on the possibility of relocating the
dock holders at Avalon. Fackler stated that it would be almost
impossible, especially due to the Iow water, and since the dock
holders are non-abutting residents, a relocation would mean that
their docks could be across town. He added that their is a high
demand From non-abutting property owners For dock sites.
MOTION m~de by Asleson, seconde(I by Burke to approve the
Dock Inspector's recommendation For approval of the 1990
Dock Location Nap as submitted. Motion carried unanim-
ously.
Park Co~ission Minutes
November 9, i~8~
Page Three
Asleson aOded that it was baO timing to request the removal
these City docks when the water is so Iow and docks are high in
demand. In adOition, the LMCD may Freeze the number of dock
sites For the City of Mound at our current number of Oocks,
therefore, it is not Favorable to eliminate any dock sites at
this time.
This issue will be reviewed by the City Council on November 14,
1989.
1990 0OCK LOCATION RAP
There are no changes from the 1989 Dock Location Map.
1990 Total Dock Sites
abutting
non-abutting
443
I 79
264
NonIUSable docks due to Iow water
abutting
non-abutting
I990 Total Usable Dock Sites
abutting
non-abutting usable dock sites
-83
360
-13
-70
166
194
buoys 6
11/89
INVENTORY OF CITY DOCKS LOCATED ON THE ISLAND
Total Number of Dock Sites on the Island
108 abutting
69 non-abutting
Number of Unusable Dock Sites Due to Low Water
6 abutting
16 non-abutting
Nun'~ber of Usable Dock Sites Available for 1990
102 abutting
53 non-abutting
177
22
155
November ~. 1989
PARKS WITH COMMONS DOCKS
# oF # of Dock
Name of Park/Be_ag_n_ _D_o.c~_s Ho I ders
Centerview Beach i I 17
Carlson Park 9 I 1
Avalon Park 5 9
Round Bay I (transit)
Twin Park 5 6
Ridgewood Park 7 I 1
Lagoon Park 4 4
Cresent Park 17 23
Lost Lake Park 6 6
hi i .o_la I and End
74 98
P I ayground Sw i mm ing
_E_q .u_ i_F2 ~_en__t_ Beach
X
The City of Mound has 23 parks, 10 o¢ these parks have city
docks. Only 6 of the 98 dock sites belong to abutting dock
holders.
LEN HARRELL EMERGENCY 911
Chief of Police
November 13, 1989
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle an~ound City Council
Len Harrell.~
Emergency Preparedness Exercise
On November 20, 1989, at 1900 hours, the Mound Fire Department and police
department will sponsor an emergency preparedness/mass casualty incident
within Mound. The exercise is designed to identify any problems that may
arise in a major critical incident and to practice working cooperatively
with serveral agencies in an emergency.
Outside agencies that are expected to be involved include Hennepin
County Emergency Preparedness, Hennepin County Sheriff's Department, Orono
Police, St. Bonifacius - Minnetrista Police, and Waconia Hospital.
If you are interested in observing the exercise, please contact the Mound
Police Department for further information.
THOMAS L. JOHNSON ~
COUNTY ATTORNEY ~'
OFFICE OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEY
2000 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOT^ 55487
(612) 348-5550
November 7, 1989
Steve Smith
Mayor
City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
NOV t $ ;989
Dear Mayor:
An important new organization is coming into being. It
is the Hennepin County Crime Victim Council. Along with the
founding members of the Council, I would like to interest you in
serving on the Board of Directors for the Council or offering
your participation in other ways.
To discuss this, you are cordially invited to attend a
continental breakfast meeting on Wednesday December 6, 1989,
7:30-8:45 a.m. at Lutheran Brotherhood, Room 2. A select number
of other business and community leaders, educators, legislators,
judges and attorneys, law enforcement officials and social
service providers will be in attendance.
The creation of a Hennepin County Crime Victim Council
is an exciting development. It is also one of major importance.
It will ensure the optimum cooperation among crime victim service
providers and assure that victims receive the attention and care
that they properly deserve. But it will only happen if all
segments of our community pull together. I urge you to support
our efforts by attending the reception on December 6.
Sincerely,
THOMAS L. JOHNSON
Hennepin County Attorney
TLJ:cam
Enclosure: R.S.V.P. card & envelope
[COUNCIL]
T.D.D. (612) 348-6015 FAX (612) 348-2042
HENNEPIN COUNTY IS AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
LAK~ MiNNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
~ATER 'STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COI~IlTTEE
AGENDA
RE'D NOV 1 3 1989
7:30 a.m., Saturday, November 18, 1989
LMCD Office, Wayzata
1. Study report (attached) on moratorium proposal
City of Wayzata New Dock License and Special Density Permit applications
for expansion in upper lagoon, with public hearing set for December 6 (plan
attached)
3. Minnetonka Yacht Club/Lake Minnetonka Sailing School Order (attached) for
approval
4. Inspection reports/ refund: Rosenblum/Ulrich dock length variance
(Carsons Bay, Deephaven)
5. 1989 Dock License application for approval: Crystal Bay Service (late
submittal)
6. Additional business recommended by the committee
ENVIRONMENT:
1. Wayzata Yacht Club - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (attached) for
District Mooring Area
2. 1989-1990 Deicing applications for approval
EWM update
A. Equipment maintenance status
B. Exploration for barge transport, harvester to shore
4. Additional business recommended by the committee
11-9-89
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Study Report
Moratorium on Multiple Docks
4:00 pm, Tuesday, November 7, 1989
LMCD Offices, Wayzata depot
1989
TO: Water Structures & Environment Committee
FROM: Chair Jim Grathwol
Present:
Water Structures & Environment Committee Chair Jim Grathwol, Excelsior;
LMCD Directors Doug Babcock, Spring Park; LMCD Chair Dave Cochran,
Greenwood; John Lewman, Minnetrista; Bob Rascop, Shorewood; Dave
Arndorfer and Frank Mixa, Consultants; Gene Strommen, Executive Director
A review of an interim ordinance restricting the licensing, construction and
maintenance of new commercial and multiple docks and new docks making common
use of adjacent dock-use-areas was undertaken by persons in attendance at the
invitation of Grathwol. The interim ordinance was prepared by attorney LeFevere
in response to the need to study controls which may be required as the density
of boats on Lake Minnetonka continues to grow according to the Management Study
underway by Arndorfer Associates.
The interim ordinance was presented to the Water Structures & Environment Committee
at its October 14 meeting. Chair Cochran agreed that the ordinance will require
further study, and asked Grathwol, who was appointed chair of the Water Structures
& Environment Committee at the October 25 Board meeting, to pursue further
study of this interim ordinance.
The study group meeting at this time reached a consensus for recommendation
to the Water Structures & Environment Committee consisting of the following:
An ordinance change should be prepared to remove Type 3 and higher wetlands
from any consideration toward shoreline footage requirement applicable
to watercraft storage, provided a right-to-access is protected. (See attach-
ment for Wetland definition and types.)
2. Consider an ordinance which would prohibit docks which would create a condo-
minium dock over the water.
The Water Structures & Environment Committee should consider amending the
proposed interim ordinance to accept land-zoned single family residential
which must meet the 1:50 requirements for watercraft under the existing
ordinance, provided wetlands of Type 3 and higher are not included in the
computation of the lakeshore.
4. Require that the interim ordinance be terminated after three years.
ERS:jlm
enc: Interim ordinance, amending §2.01
Wetlands Definition, Types
Density Condition~Projections
Lake Access, Use Management Summary
One for 50' Rule/Four Boat Rule Summary
Development Districts Proposal (not recommended by the study group)
ORDINANCE NO.
INTERIM ORDINANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PROTECTING LAKE MINNETONKA, THE PLANNING
PROCESS, AND THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND
WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC, AND RESTRICTING THE
LICENSING, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
OF NEW COMMERCIAL AND MULTIPLE DOCKS AND
NEW DOCKS MAKING COMMON USE OF ADJACENT
DOCK USE AREAS
The Board of Directors of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
ordains:
Section
1.01.
1.02.
1.03.
1.04.
1.05.
1.06.
1.07.
1. Background.
The District is currently undertaking a study for the purpose of
establishing a comDrehensive Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka
(the Plan).
A part of the Plan deals with the subject of lake access including
public access and boat storage on the lake, the increase of boat use
on the lake which results from such access and storage, and the
implications of such .increased boat use for recreation, safety, and
the environment.
At periods of peak usage the lake is at or exceeding its reasonable
carrying capacity for boat usage. Increased access or increased boat
storage in the lake will result in a higher level and intensity of boat
usage.
The lake is subject to continuing pressure from increased
development, which pressure is expected to continue.
Approximately 8,000 boats are currently stored on Lake Minnetonka.
Access by trailering with re~.sonably accessible parking for cars and
trailers is available for approximately _ boats.
It is anticipated that public access for trailered boats will continue to
increase. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has
indicated that access with dedicated parking for an additional 350
boats will eventually be made available.
The most restrictive density limitation currently contained in the
LMCD Code is one boat per fifty feet of shoreline. On a lakewide
basis this standard would allow storage of approximately 13,500
boats, more than 5,000 in excess of the number currently stored on
the lake. tlowever, other density limitations, such as those
applicable to residential sites and commercial docks with special
density licenses, are considerably less restrictive, allowing the
potential for boat storage at a significantly higher density.
Additionally many existing dock facilities on the lake have been
"grandfathered" by the LMCD Code at their current density, thereby
leaving less capacity for growth of other uses.
1.08.
Although the Plan has not yet been completed, it has become
.apparent that current LMCD regulatory controls on access and boat
storage are not adequate to ensure the protection and preservation of
the lake as a natural resource; to protect the public health, safety
and welfare; to preserve the recreational value of the lake; or to
provide equitable access to the lake for riparian owners and for the
general public.
1.09. The greatest growth in boat storage facilities in recent past bas been
in co~nmercial and multiple docks including facilities of homeowner
associations and in docks making common use of adjacent dock use
areas.
1.10.
This continuing growth, if unrestricted, will necessitate the
establishment of substantially more restrictive regulatory controls on
boat storage in the future, which controls will impose significant
hardships and exacerbate inequities in access to the Lake.
1.11. The studies in progress will generate the information needed for the
Board to make informed decisions about appropriate regulatory
controls on boat storage.
1.12. Pending completion of tile study and establishment of appropriate
regulatory controls, there is a need for an interi~n ordinance to be
adopted for the protection of the Lake and of the public health,
safety and welfare and for the purpose of ensuring an orderly
planning process designed to secure reasonable and equitable access
to the Lake for riparian owners and for the general public. .
Section 2. Prohibition.
2.01.
During the period that this interim ordinance is in effect, no new
multiple docks or mooring areas or commercial docks as defined in
LMCD Code, Section 1.02, Subdivisions 8 and 28, and no new docks
making common use of adjacent dock use areas pursuant to LMCD
Code, Section 2.0l, Subdivision 3, shall be constructed, established or
maintained. Docks and mooring areas shall be deemed to be new
unless they are previously existing and, in the case of facilities
requiring licenses or permits, duly authorized by the District. No
modifications or alterations of facilities described in this paragraph
shall be per~nitted.
2.02.
During tile period that this interi,n ordinance is in effect, no
applications for licenses or permits for facilities described in
paragraph 2.01 shall be accepted, processed or considered by tile
District.
Section 3. Applicability.
3.01. This ordinance shall not apply to facilities for which the District has
received complete applications prior to ·
3.02..This ordinance shall not apply to applications for temporary low
water variances for modification of existing facilities provided the
variance does not increase the size of slips or the number of boats
stored at the facility.
Section 4. Effective Dates.
4.01. This ordinance shall be effective the day following its publication and
shall expire on , unless earlier repealed or
extended by the Board.
This enactment is in effect from and after its pass~ge and publication in
accordance with the enabling act o[ the District. It is enacted by a majority vote
of all the members of the Board and has the effect of an ordinance.
Adopted by the LMCD Board of Direetors this r_ day of ,
1989.
David Coehran, Chairlnan
ATTEST:
EUgene R. s~~n-~n, Exee~(~-v~ Director
LKll0-4
WETLANDS
DEFINITION:
On January 10, 1989, four Federal agencies, the Corps of Engineers, Fish and
Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency and the Soil Conservation
Service, agreed on a unified method for identifying and delineating wetlands.
They also adopted the Corps of Engineers' definition of a wetland:
"Wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or
groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that
under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation
typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions."
WETLAND TYPES
The classification system most commonly used by regulatory agencies, including
the DNR and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, is the Fish and Wildlife
Service Circular 39 system. The eight wetland types occurring in Minnesota are'
Type 1
Type 2
Type 3
Type 4
Type 5
Type 6
Type 7
Type 8
Seasonally flooded basins and flats.
Inland fresh meadows.
Inland shallow fresh marshes.
Inland deep fresh marshes.
Inland fresh open water.
Shrub swamps.
Wooded swamps.
Bogs.
The DNR and the Watershed District define wetlands for regulatory purposes as
those areas classified as Type 3, 4 and 5 wetlands.
POINT: The controls for densities 8.0 and 7.0 need to be studied and an
implementation plan established'by the LMCD which include the following
activities.
Density 8.0 (Present Conditions)
From the Lake Access Plan:
Fix homeowner associations at existing levels,
Manage marinas to assure their services are open to all citizens of
the state,
Issue no special density permits at municipal or homeowner association
licensed docks,
Ban further sales of condominium docks, in any form,
Develop a plan for managing excursion boating,
Allocate 350 additional (to 700) car/trailer parking spaces for public
and private access ramps.
From the Use Management Plan:
The LMCD shall continue its present system of managing use of the lake
surface through ordinance and regulation,
Improve law enforcement presence on the lake,
Designate anchorages on the lake with appropriate restrictions,
Develop a plan for providing further beaching/rafting areas,
Refine the established program of imposing limits on the use of bays
with the greatest use density,
Coordinate development and implementation of an aggressive boater
education program in Hennepin County,
Coordinate a legislative program to obtain state boat operator
licensing,
Coordinate a legislative program to obtain boat titling and
registration,
Study means of limiting boat wakes,
Restrict use of and/or license operators of personal watercraft and
sailboards,
Density 7.0
From the Lake Access Plan:
Fix municipal access at existing levels,
Link further access growth in any form with increased law enforcement
presence on the lake,
Determine the source of the growth in density, then impose
restrictions to slow growth of the forms of access responsible
for the growth,
Review the 1:50 and 1:10 rules to determine if a more restrictive one
is needed, and
Review the rules governing riparian storage of boats.
From the Use Management Plan:
Determine the source of the growth in density,
Review the need for lowering the speed limit, day and night,
Review use and storage densities of individual bays for further
regulation,
Review the maximum boat length for private watercraft and excursion
boats,
Require a certificate from an approved boater education course to
operate a boat on the lake, and
Undertake a study of conflicts on the lake to identify groups in
conflict and to determine the appropriate management remedies.
Restrict ultralight take-off and landings from 9:00 am to 6:00 pm the
following day on weekends and holidays, and
Continue to develop anchorage opportunities, particularly through
public acquisition of riparian property.
POINT: Because the 350 additional car/trailer parking spaces have already been
allocated, the Management Plan calls for a study to be undertaken to determine
the plan of action for implementing the access and use controls for density 6.0.
Density 6.0
From the Lake Access Plan:
Link further access growth to development of anchorage opportunities
at a ratio of one additional access unit to two anchorage units,
Initiate a program to reduce and ultimately eliminate grandfathering
at municipal and homeowner associations docks,
Review the frontage-foot rules to determine if a more restrictive one
is needed, and
Review the rules governing riparian storage of boats.
From the Use Management Plan:
Impose use restrictions between 10:00 am and 6:00 pm on weekends and
holidays, and
Continue to develop anchorage opportunities, particularly through
public acquisition of riparian property.
LAKE ACCESS AND USEI~AGEMENT
POINT: There are two fundamental management objectives that determine how
access to the lake will me managed. One addresses access, the other use
management.
From the Lake Access Plan:
MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE: The management of recreational boating access on Lake
Minnetonka shall be based on density of use. As density increases on the lake
as a whole or on individual bays, lakes or arms, regulation shall become
progressively more restrictive.
From the Use Management Plan:
MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE: The management of recreational boating on Lake Minnetonka
shall be based on density of use. As density increases on the lake as a whole
or on individual bays, lakes or arms, regulation shall become progressively more
restrictive.
The progressively more restrictive regulation is triggered by the density of
boats on the lake during normal peak hours on normal peak use days (between
12:00 noon and 3:00 pm, on summer Saturdays and Sundays that are not on holiday
weekends).
Based on the 1984 and 1986 use data, we are at a density of 8.1 usable acres of
lake surface (Table 1). If just 19 active boats are added to the lake, then the
density will be at 8.0. Based on the multiple dock licenses already approved
this year, that density will be achieved the first year that the lake level
returns to close to normal levels.
TABLE
Change in Potential Active Boats and
Boat Density for Alternative Density Standards
Acres
Existing Density
Growth to:
8 00 Acres per Boat
7 00 Acres per Boat
600 Acres per Boat
5 00 Acres per Boat
4 00 Acres per Boat
3 00 Acres per Boat
2 00 Acres per Boat
1.00 Acres per Boat
Change in
Active Active
Boats Boats
1453
Total
Acres
Per Boat
14043
9.66
Usable
Acres
Per Boat
11773
8.10
1472 19 9.54 8.00
1682 229 8.35 7.00
1962 509 7.16 6.00
2355 902 5.96 5.00
2943 1490 4.77 4.00
3924 2471 3.58 3.00
5887 4434 2.39 2.00
11773 10320 1.19 1.00
POINT: Neither the one for 50 rule nor the four boat rule for resident
rtparians is an acceptable basis for long-term management of boat storage on the
lake. Both rules are too generous, considering the number of boats that could
be added to the lake.
One for Fifty Feet of Lakeshore Rule
Miles of shoreline:
Feet of shoreline:
Theoretical maximum number of boats:
125 miles
660000 feet
13200 stored boats
Existing number of boats (1987):
4973 stored boats
Theoretical allowable growth: 8227 stored boats
Four Boat Rule
Number of Riparians:
Theoretical maximum number of boats:
Existing number of boats (1987):
Theoretical allowable growth:
4000 stored boats
16000 stored boats
4973 stored boats
11027 stored boats
Summary:
One for Fifty Rule 8227 stored boats
Four Boat Rule 11027 stored boats
Difference -2800 stored boats
POINT: Growth in boat storage on the lake has favored municipal docks, marinas
and homeowner associations over riparian and public access in the period
1974-1987. Continuation of the present policies and rules of the LMCD will most
probably continue this pattern except for the following. Municipal growth is
finite. There is only so much municipally owned land qualifying for the one for
fifty rule. Second, the number of marinas has not significantly changed in
recent years, and may not in the future because of the land use controls of the
cities. Therefore, the greatest growth most probably will be from homeowner
associations.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
A possible compromise for establishing a moratorium is to consider the formation
of Development Districts. These would be portions of cities on the lakeshore
that would be exempt from certain parts of the moratorium.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEFINED
A Development District is a creation of the LMCD with the advice and consent of
the cities to provide.for a period of stabilization to balance the different
levels of single family residential lakeshore development in riparian
communities.
Its purpose is not to control the configuration of the subdivision, but instead
to establish areas that will be excluded from any moratorium on licensing common
docks.
CRITERIA
Shorelands may be included, at the discretion of the LMCD Board, only if ATJJ of
the following exist:
1. The property qualifies as developable under the municipal zoning ordinance
and the LMCD Code (for boat storage) without variances in these areas: lot
width, lot area, building height (others to be added or considered).
2. The property is not now a part of any recorded subdivision.
3. The development plan and subsequent developments conform to the Standards
and Criteria contained in the "Preliminary Shoreland Management Plan" as revised
and its successors.
4. No Type III or higher wetlands may be considered in determining qualifying
frontage for boat storage purposes.
5. Ail boat storage in a Development District must be at a single common dock.
6. Lands subdivided are immediately and permanently removed from the
Development District.
7. During this moratorium, frontage shall be calculated on the basis of the
shortest distance between lot lines at the point of intersection with the 929.4
contour.
8. No non-riparian access shall be allowed.
PROCESS
Cities shall have 90 days in which to request the establishment of a Development
District.
The LMCD Board shall establish a 90-day period during which requests for
development districts shall be accepted by the District.
A majority vote of the LMCD Board is required to establish each Development
District within any single community.
r~ECEIVF-O
' L.M.C.D.
REC'D NOV 3 1989
Lake innetonka Conservation District
DENSITY
LMCD Fee # ///'~
{for LMCD use~
APPLICATION~
Because this form is
to be copied, please !
use black ink or type.!
SPECIAL DENSITY PE~IIT
City of Wayzata
473-0234
(Print or type owner's name)
600 Rice Street, Wayzata, MN
55391
Phone; if no
answer, call~
937-9510
(Owner's address)
the owner of land in the City of Wayzata
Business name~
(if different from owner)
Phonel if no
answer, call~
(Street address)
(Mailing address if different from street address)
which is riparian to LMCD area(s) Wayzata Bay , No(s). 29
Lake Mtnnetonka, applies pursuant to LHCD Code Chapter III for a Special. Density Permit,
in accordance with all data and other information submitted herewith and made a part
hereof. The following must accompany this appltcation~
(a) Locator map
'(b) County plat of area
(c) Certified survey and legal description
(d) Site plan of dockage on/or
to overlay survey
(e) D~ck construction detail sheet
o
Type of facility ( )Outlot association
(please check one)~ ( )Multiple dwelling
( )Private multiple
(X)Munictpal ( )Commercial marina
( )Transient ( )Private club
( )Other (explain)
Intended use of facility Increase boat slips from 85 to 100 in City marina
Abutting property owners at the lakeshore..
North or West City property to the west
(Name and ~ILING address)
South or East Minnetonka Boat Works to the east, 294 Grove Lane. Wayzm~m
(Name and ~ILING address)
Other affected parties none
(Names and ~ILING addresses - attach sheet if necessary)
Special bensity Permit Application
Page 2
City of Wayzata
(Name)
4. Site Lake frontage~ 2,150 feet.
5. Computation of number of Watercraft Availability Units (WAUs)~
Frontage 2,150 feet + 50 ~ 43 WAUs at one boat per 50 feet.
6. Number of WAUs applied for~ 100
7. Density of WAUs applied for~
Frontage 2,150 feet ~ 100 (number of WAUs) =
21.5 feet per WAU.
Special requirements (~3.081, Subd. 5), Please indicate benefits to the Lake and
other factors upon which this permit should be considered. Amenities may be from
Group B, Group C, and/or Group D below, but at least one must be from Group A.
Attach description, photos, scaled drawings, etc.
A. Public Access
(1) Provides slips for an additional 15 persons and/or families.
(2) Those 15 slip holders possibly may free up 15 spaces at a public ramp or launch
(3)
B. Environmental Protection
(2)
(3)
C. Public Service
(1) Same as "A" above.
(2)
(3)
D. Other Amenities
(1)
(2)
(3)
E. Other Factors
(1)
(2)
(3)
All required permits, licenses and approvals have been obtained from the City in
which the Special Density Permit facility is located, and from the MDNR~
( )Yes (X)No~ explain~ Application submitted to M~DNR; approval takes up to 60 da¥o.
r~.f \
". \
F I L%I~cR DAM
o~! °
LI
UPi~ER
ABINA
MEAN 929.5
I
I
I
hOOD DOCK A
'EXISTING
'-'BRIDGE °
RIP RAP
Each new slip will have a 12" mooring
post 16' from the bow ring.
No docks will be installed.
RIP RAP.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
IN RE: APPLICATION OF MINNETONI<A YACHT CLUB/
LAKE MINNETONKA SAILING SCHOOL
FINDINGS
The hearing on the application for a special density license and new dock
license for the Minnetonka Yacht Club/Lake Minnetonka Sailing School was held at
7:00 p.m. on May 24, 1989, at the Tonka Bay Village Hall. The Applicant was
represented by Mr. Thomas Maple.
The Applicant is the owner of property identified as Lighthouse Island in Bay
St. Louis, LMCD Area 33. Lighthouse Island has 1003.8 lineal feet of shoreline and
is currently licensed for facilities for 40 transient and 5 service slips. The
Applicant seeks a special density license for the construction of facilities which
would allow one additional service slip and 21 additional slips for sailboat storage.
The maximum number of boat storage units (BSUs) for which the Island
could be licensed is 100. Therefore, the 67 BSUs requested here are well below the
maximum. Nine of the slips will be used for small keel boats used for public sailing
lessons and 12 for yacht club members. Given the faet that the faeilities will be
used primarily for sailboats and given the location of the facility, the Board finds
that the review criteria of LMCD Code Sections 2.03 and 2.05 are met and that the
amenities set forth in the following Order are sufficient to justify issuance of a
special density license and a new dock license.
ORDER
On the basis of the foregoing, it is ordered that a new dock license and
special density license be granted to the Applicant on the following conditions:
e
The licenses are granted for construction and maintenance of facilities for
67 BSUs in accordance with the dock plan attached hereto as Attachment
One and hereby made a part of this Order.
The licenses are conditioned on the continuing maintenance of the following
public amenities, each of which has been suggested and agreed to by the
Applicant.
a. Twenty-one of the non-transient storage slips shall be used only for
the storage of sailboats.
b. The Island steel shoreline support and landscaping shah be
maintained.
c. The Licensee shall operate a sailing school for members of the
general public which could instruct and train approximately 400
students per year.
d. The Licensee shall provide and maintain public toilets, telephones and
dumpsters at its Lighthouse Island and Carson Bay facilities.
e. Licensee shall maintain VHF and CB radio communications on
Lighthouse Island.
f. Licensee shall provide public access for local, regional, national and
olympic competition.
g. Sailing school shah not be operated on holidays.
h. Licensee shah donate to the City of Deephaven a "make-ready" dock
to be located at the Carson Bay access. In the event the City of
Deephaven declines to accept the dock or to maintain it, licensee
shall install appropriate signage to inform the public of the
availability of public telephones, toilets and dumpsters required in
this Order.
Minnetonka. Ail such use is subject to continued regulation by the District to
assure the public of reasonable and equitable access to the lake.
By Order of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors,
this day of , 1989.
Eugene R. Strommen, Executive ~tor
Lake M innetonka Conservation District
LKllO-Oll
~- -r --- 'v,oEo RO,O~
CLASSROOM
.~a:=..~.~. _'- L =' '. __
STORAGE
¢ · ~ '--' . ~ .,~
!
../ __
Attachment One
E.R. ' (filled in by EQB)
NOV
5/1/84
! 1989
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
MARK APPROPRIATE BOX: .....
[~ REGULAR EAW .. ................. ---[-~ ..'-$COPING EAW
NOTE TO REVIEWERS: For regular'EAWs, written comments should address the accuracy and completeness ~f the F_AW
information, potential impacts that may warrant investigation and/or the need for an ElS. For scoping EAWs, written com-
ments shoultl address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest Issues for investigation in the ElS. Such
comments must be submitted to the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) during the 30-day period following notice of the
EAW's availability in the EQB Monitor. Contact the EQB (metro: 612/296-8253: non-metro: 1-800-652.9747, ask for envi-
ronmental review program) or the RGU to find out when the 30-day comment period ends. ·
o
ProjectName Wayzata Yacht C]ub-T~mpor~ry Mnnorin~ Fi~3:dRelocatioq
Propos,:r Wayzata Yacht Qlub 3. RGU Lake Minnetonka Conservation
Contact Person Sruc'e Tam : ' Contact Person
Address,, 170~ James Ct andTitle
/:~prn~vil 1 ~ ~ MN 55337 Address
Phone. 89 -6782
Distric
Phone
Project Location: '~/4 SW' ~/,~Section5 & 6 Township TllTNRange R22W
a. CountyName Hennepin Clty/TownshipName t,'/ayzat~,, ' ~
b. Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW:
1. a county map showing the general area of the project.
2. a copy(les) oir USGS 71/:~ minute, 1:24,000 scale map.
3. a site plan showing the location of significant features such as proposed structures, roads, extent o[llood plain,
wetlands, wells, etc.
4. an existing land use map and a zoning map of the immediate area, if available.
Describe the proposed project completely (attach additional sheets as necessa~).
Temporar~ relocation of existing 22 boa~ m0bring field from ~00 ft. from
shore to 800 ft. from shore. (see attached site plan) The relocation
is in response to the low water level in Lake Minnetonka. In the last
two years water depth in the ~00 ft. moorin& area was lower than the "
6 ft. depth required for deep draft sailboats.
The mooring field'will consist of concrete anchors connected to approved
bouys with chain.
~. Reason forEAWpreparation:..Discretiona~v EAW coverin~ moorinG field relocation
, List all mandatory category rule "s which apply:
7. Estimated constructlon cost Less than $1000
¢
4 Total project area (acres) MoorinK Field 5.71 orlength(miles).
e Number of residential units 0 or commercial, industrial, or institutional square footage.,
O. Number of proposed parking spaces Automobile-None
1 · List all known local, state a~d federal permits/approvals/funding required:"
Level oIGovernment "Type o(Appllcatlon Status :':-. ...
2.
Local:
~' .Lake~ Minnetonka ~ Moorin& .. : ..
Conservation District Field Permit Renewal of
Is the proposed project inconsistent with the local adopted comprehensive land use
plan or any other adopted plans?
If yes. explain:
Temporary
Annual Permit
[~No ['-I Yes
Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site.
Current site is used as a boat marina since
marina is residential.
1965. Area
around
the
Approximately how many acres of the site are in each o( the following categories?
(Acreages should add up to total project area beiore and a~ter construction. J
Before A~er Before A~er
Forest/.Wooded ~ ~ o · Wetland (types 3-8} ~) c) ·
Cropland ~ o Impervious Surlace ~ o
Br~sh/grassland ~ ~ Other (speci[l/). ,~ ~D
Describe the soils on the site. giving the SCS soll classification types, i[known. -
Lake bottom
Does the site contain peat soils, highly erodible soils, steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow
limestone formations, abandoned u~ells, or any geologic hazards? Il yes. show on site
map and explain:
Yes
18.
Does any part of the project area involve:
a. shoreland zoning district?
b. delineated 100.year flood plain?
c. state or federally designated river land use district?
Il'yes. Identify water bod.v and apl~licable state classification(s), and describe measures
to protect water and related land resources:
~No ~ Yes
No Yes
No Yes
!9.
Describe any physical alteration (e.g., dikes, excavation, fill. stream diversion) of any
drainage system, lake. stream, and/or wetland. Describe measures lo minimize Im-
pairment of the water.related resources. Estimate quantity of material to be dredged
and indicate where spoils will be deposited.
Ho. physical alteration. Relocation of'mooring
instead of dredging.
field being done
20.
a. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surf,ace water? If yes, explain
(indicate quantity and source):
b. Will the project affect groundwater levels in any wells (on or off the site)? if yes. ex-
plain: . . .
[~No [-'-] Yes
21.
Describe the erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after
construction o! the project.
22.
a. Will the project generate:
1. surface and stormwater runoff?.
2. sanitary wastewater?
:3. industrial wastewater?
4. cooling water (contact and noncontact)?
if yes. identify sources, volumes, quality (if other than normal domestic sewage).
and treatment methods. Give th~ basis or methodology of estimates.
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
b. Identify receiving waters, i~cluding groundwater, and ebaluate'the impacts of the
discharges listed above. I[ discharges to groundwater are anticipated, probide per-
' colation/permeabiiity and other hydrogeological test data. if available.
Will the project generate (either during or after conslruction):
a. air pollution?
b. dust?
c. noise?
d. odors?
If yes..explain, including as appropriate: distances lo sensitive land uses: expected lev.
els and duration of nqise: types and quantities of air pollutants [rom stacks, mobile
sources, and fugitive emissions (dustl: odor sources: and mitigative measures [or any
impacts. Give the basis or methodoh~!l.V ,,I estimates.
Since project is a relocation, no additional noise
will be generated.
/No
No
No
No
or air
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
pbllution
~ ~-~ · Describe the type and amount el solid and/or hazardous u~aste including sludges and .'
ashes that will be generated and the method and location of disposal: "
:6.
None
WEll Ihe project affect:
a. fish or wildlife habitat, or movement of animals?
b. any native species that are officially listed as state endangered, threatened, or of
special concern (animals and/or plants)?
II yes. explain (ide.nti~ species and describe impact):
Do an.y historical, archaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project
site? I[ yes. explain (show resources on a site map and describe impact):-.
1~ No [~ Yes
[~' No El Yes
I .no E3 e,
:7.
:8.
Will the project cause the Impairment or destruction o[:
a. designated park or recreation areas? ........ ' "-" ':
b. prime or unique farmlands?
c. ecologically sensitive areas?
d. scenic views and vistas?
e. other unique resources (specie/)? ' -.
il yes, explain:
Sailboats in the mooring field will become more
on the east side Wayzata Yacht Club
For each affected road indicate the current average daily traffic (APT). increase in APT
contributed by the project and the directional distributions of traffic.
Since the project is a relocation of
automobile traffic will be generated
mooring field, no additional
over previous usages.
,9 · Are adequate utilities and public services now available to service the project? !! not. I
what additional utilities and/or services will be required? I"'1 No ~'--~Yes i
;ummar of Issues
~r regular EAWs, list the issues as identified by "yes" answers above. Discuss alternatives and mitigative measures for these
;ues. For scoplng F_AWs. list known issues, alternatives, and mitigative measures to be addressed in ElS.
Impairment of Scenic Views - This relocation is temporary and necessitated
by the unusual drought conditions in Minnesota. When the lake returns
to the normal controlled level the mooring field will be moved back
to its 400 ft. location. Since the temporary 800 ft. locationwill
be under an Annual District Mooring Permit' the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District can enforce movement back tp the pre-drought 400 ft. location.
-:R11FICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT
ereby certil~ that the inl'ormation contained in ~his documenl is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and that
pies of the completed EAW have been made a~.,ilable Io all puints on the official EQB distribution list.
4
Date
PROPOSE
T~PORn~Y
~OUY F)ELD
~RTH
SCALE
!
November 9, 1989
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Joyce Nelson
Recycling Coordinator
SUBJECT: October's Recycling
With October having 5 Mondays and Tuesdays there was some
confusion as to when the pickup was. I received calls,
Linda received calls and BFI received calls. This usually
happens at least twice a year. One solution to this problem
would be to go to weekly pickup. Cities such as Plymouth,
Wayzata, Golden Valley, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Excelsior,
Champlin, Crystal and many more have weekly pickup, their
tonnages have gone from staying about the same to tripling.
If Hennepin County does change the funding policy for 1991
where we would received $55.00 per ton of material picked
up we would need to pickup somewhere around 83 tons of material
just to pay for the contractor. Next year Hennepin is still
reimbursing us 80% of our costs.
At this time last year 163.47 tons of material was picked
up. As of October this year 392.44 tons have been picked
up. So you can see by going to twice monthly we have more
than doubled our tonnage. Average household participation
in 1988 was 460, this year with twice a month pickup we
average 2,050 households.
October's pickup was 31.77 and 1907 households.
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511
EMERGENCY 911
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Len Harrell
Monthly Report for October, 1989
STATISTICS
The police department responded to 709 calls for serv-
ice during the month of October. There were 29 Part
I offenses reported. Those offenses included 3
criminal sexual conduct, 3 aggravated assaults, 3
burglaries, 15 larcenies, 4 vehicle thefts and 1 arson.
There were 60 Part II offenses reported. Those of-
fenses included 7 child abuse/neglect, 2 forgery/NSF
checks, 15 criminal damage to property, 3 narcotics
violations, 2 liquor law violations, 7 DWI's, 5 simple
assaults, 8 domestics (5 with assaults), 6 harassment,
3 runaway, and 2 other offenses.
The patrol division issued 154 adult citations and 14
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 27 citations. Warnings were issued to 28
individuals for a variety of violations.
There were eight adults and eight juveniles arrested
for felonies. Fifteen adults were arrested for mis-
demeanors. There were ten warrant arrests.
The department assisted in 6 vehiclular accidents; 2
with personal injuries. There were 25 medical emer-
gencies and 76 animal complaints. Mound assisted other
agencies on 23 occasions in October and requested as-
sistance 4 times.
Property valued at $14,034 was stolen during the month;
$14,935 was recovered.
1
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - OCTOBER, 1989
Ve
The IACP convention was held in Louisville, KY and
there were a number of fine seminars offered. I at-
tended workshops entitled, "Critical Incidents: Lessons
Learned," "The Facts on Public Safety - Issues &
Answers," "Kids at Risk - Chief at Risk," "Labor Rela-
tions - Gaining Back Management Rights," "Policies
Which Put your Department at Risk - What are the Solu-
tions,'' "It Can Happen in Your City: Assault with an
AK-47," and "Community Oriented Policing: Fact, Fan-
tasy, or the Future."
Reserves
The police reserves donated 273 hours to the police
department and community in October. The reserves cur-
rently have 12 members.
The reserves have been actively working school func-
tions such as football games, dances, and the homecom-
ing parade. CPR classes are being conducted at com-
munity services.
3
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
OCTOBER, 1989
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
THIS
MONTH
¥~R TO
DATE
Hazardous Citations 120
Non-Hazardous Citations 29
Hazardous Warnings 7
Non-Hazardous Warnings 21
Verbal Warnings 103
Parking Citations 27
DWI 7
Over .10 3
Property Damage Accidents 4
Personal Injury Accidents 2
Fatal Accidents 0
Adult Felony Arrests 9
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 24
Adult Misdemeanor Citations 4
Juvenile Felony Arrests 8
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 11
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 5
Part I Offenses 29
Part II Offenses 60
Medicals 16
Animmal Complaints 76
Other Public Contacts 483
1,295
305
124
276
1,199
509
53
30
82
27
0
42
290
74
31
62
30
279
555
250
958
5,772
L~ST
TO DATE
1,203
565
293
578
1,196
458
76
44
97
28
0
33
257
85
70
82
48
345
679
221
964
5,398
TOTAL 1,048
Assists 65
Follow-Ups 25
Henn. County Child Protection 7
Mutual Aid Given 23
Mutual Aid Requested 4
12,243
603
257
45
183
83
12,720
572
454
47
133
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
MV/ATV
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
OCTOBERt 1989
ADULT
7
3
0
7
0
83
1
3
0
0
5
1
21
0
2
0
1
27
2
0
0
11
0
7
181
juv
0
0
0
0
7
2
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
RUN: e-NOV-89
C~S03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY?
:TIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09000 SPEEDING
09001 J-SPEEDING
09002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09004 RESTRICTED D/L
09010 BAC OVER .10
09014 STOP SIGN
09016 FAILURE TO YIELD
09017 J-FAILURE TO YIELD
09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
J'EQIPMENT VIOLATION
09022 EXHIBITION DRIVING
09025 J-ILLEGAL/UNSAFE TURNS
09026 OVER THE CENTER LINE
09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION
09040 NO SEATBELT
09100 PARKING/ALL OTHER
09140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS
09150 NO TRAILER PARKING
09151 J-NO TRAILER PARKING
09200 DAS/DAR/DAC
09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
09220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
09/26/89 THRU 10/25/89
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
lO 20 30 kO 50 ~0 70 80 90
16 16 16 18
I 3 3
1
1 1
3
1
9
1
1
5
1
1
3 1
1 1
3 3
1
1
1
1 1
3 3
1 5
17
1
1
1
2
10
4
1
PAGE
TOTAL
83
7
1
2
3
3
1
1
3
7
1
1
2
11
16
1
9
1
7
17
2
OFFICER
Butch Nauks
Ruth Vogel
Dan Niccum
Steve [ohman
Sherry Svoboda
Dave Ne[son
John Romain
Jeff Fleming
Hakiko Swanson
Tom Geyen
Jim Fox
Damion She[[
TOTALS
OFFICERS IN TRAINING
Katie Fox
Kevin Larson
Annette Bingham
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS
OCTOBER, 1989
DEPOSIT
$19.50
0
0
0
0
39.00
19.50
26.50
0
0
6.50
0
$110.50
BALANCE
S362.50
472.50
277.50
104.00
117.00
213.50
129.50
45.50
6.50
6.50
13.00
13.00
S1761.00
Prepared by
David Ne[son
ON/sh
2
RUN~ ~-NOV-89
C~S03
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY?
TIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERV%.CE
ACTIV%TY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
09/26/89 THRU 10/25/89
PAGE
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL
A3252
A5350
A5351
ASLT 3-SUBSTANT]AL INJURY-HANDS ETC-ADLT-ACQ
ASLT 5-]NFL]CTS ATTEMPTS NRN'HANDS'UNK RELAT
ASLT 5'INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRN'HANDS'ADLT-FAM
A5354 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRN-HANDS-CHLD-FA~
A5355 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRN-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
A5500 ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-UNK UEAP-UNK RELAT
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BOO]LY HARM-UNK ~IEAP-ADLT-ACQ
A5505 ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-UNK VEAP-CHLD-ACQ
A9602 TERROR-THRT ]NFLT PRO DM-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COH THEFT
BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK k~AP-UNK ACT
B4990 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
C3111 FORGERY-MS-HAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
D8500 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT HAR]JUANA-POSSESS]ON
F4005 ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT PROP-S299 LESS
]3060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J2700 TRAF-ACC]D-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DR]VE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
L4071 CSC 2 ~EAP-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F
L5087 CSC 3-UNK ACT-STRANGER-18 OLDER-F
L7071 CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F
M4104 LIQUOR - POSSESSING
1 1 3
1 1
2
1
2
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
5
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
3
1 2
1 2
1 3
1
1
1
1
RUN: b-NOV-89
eFS03
PRIMARY 15N~$ ONLY?
~CTIViTY COOES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
09/26/89 THRU 10/25/89
PAGE
ACT
COOE ACTl¥11¥ OE~CRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 ~O ~0 &O fO &O 70 ~0 ~0 TOTAL
V4021 VEH THEFT-MS-S250 LESS-AUTO 1 1
REPORT TOTALS: 66 48 102 71 76 7 13 2 385
RUN: ~-NOV-89
O~FO1
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
ION COOES: ALL
~TIVITY COORS: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 09/26/89 THRU 10/25/89
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
F400S
ARSON ]-MS-UNK COND-OT PROP-S299 LESS
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
I3060
CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
3 0 3 1 0 0 2 2 66.6
J2500 2
TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0
J2700 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0
TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
J3500 3
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
L4071 1
CSC 2 I,/EAP-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT*UNDER 13-F
0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0
ACT-STRANGER-18 OLDER-F
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
L7071 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F
M~104 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
LIQUC~ - POSSESSING
M4199 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
LI~JOR - OTHER
M5350 3 0 3 2 0 1 0 1
RUNAWAY
M6501 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
N3060
DISTURB PEACE'MS'CONCEALING IDENTITY
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
N3100 6
DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
0 6 5 1 0 0 1 16.6
P2110 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
RUN:
C~ F'01
5-NOV-89
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
ION COOES: ALL
:TIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 09/26/89 THRU 10/25/89
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
V1022 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-TRUCK-BUS
V2022 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500-?RUCK-BUS
V4021 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
VEH THEFT-HS-$250 LESS-AUTO
REPORT TOTALS - 86 6 80 44 19 4 13 36 45.0
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
Nove~aer 13, 1989
Present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners GeoFF Michael, Ken
Smith, Frank Weiland, William Thai, and Jerry Clapsaddle, Council
Representative Llz Jensen, Building OFFicial Jan Bertrand, City
Manager Ed Shukle, and Secretary Peggy'James. Absent and excused
were: Commissioners Ken Smith and Frank Wetland.
INTERVIEWS FOR VACANCIES ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Those present For the Interviews were: Mayor Steve Smith,
Councilmember: Liz Jensen, Skip Johnson, and Andrea Ahrens, Plan-
ning Commissioners: Chair Bill Meyer, GeoFF Michael, Jerry Clap-
saddle, and Bill Thal.
Michael Muellert 5910 Ridgewood Road
Mr. Mueller stated that he is willing to invest his time to at-
tend commission meetings, and since he is self-employed can
range his schedule accordingly. He is concerned with the en-
vironment of Mound relating to waste management and wildlife
preservation. He Feels the City needs to promote their ideas and
Issues through public awareness. He believes the Image of Mound
is Improving and that the lake is a good asset to the City since
51~ of the houses on Lake Minnetonka are in the Westonka School
District.
The Con~nissioners questioned Mr. Mueller on potential conflict of
Interest. Mr. Mueller stated that he would abstain From any vote
that directly related to any case which he is involved in. He
stated that he has good ethics and believes in being Fair.
Mr. Mueller supports truth in housing, and explained that he is
involved with the Minneapolis Board of Realtors and is Chairman
on the Truth in Housing Code Sub-committee. He believes in
growth for the City, however, is aware that we are a bedroom com-
munity.
Mr. Mueller's understanding of being an "advisory board to the
City Council" is to explore subject issues and m~ke recommenda-
tions. Mueller determined a "hardship" should be evaluated by
how a change rn~y affect the neighborhood.
b. Terry Selle, 2675 West~d~e Blvd.
Mr. Selle stated that he is Secretary of Westonka Lions Club and
is very committed member, he added that he would also be just as
committed to the Planning Commission. He is a 13 year resident
of Mound and would like to get involved with the City. He would
like the City to grow so it can produce a higher tax revenue,
such as creating more industry. He believes the image of Mound
has--in%oroved,, however-housing in Mound could be up-graded.
Planning Commission Minutes
November I3, 1989
Page Two
Mr. Selle's understanding of what "advisory board to the City
Council" means is to give the Planning Commission's decisions to
the City Council, and they will rule. His determination of a
hardship would depend on how the change would impact the neigh-
borhood.
c. Bill Voss, 4619 Kildare Road
Mr. Voss explained that he has flexible hours with work, there-
Fore, meeting attendance is no problem. He has served on several
boards and volunteered for many organizations such as the Depart-
ment of Corrections Advisory Board for Hennepin County, the
Wayzata Chapter of Demolay Parents Club, Civil Human Rights Com-
mission, Wayzata Masons and others involving his line of work as
a law enforcement officer. He believes citizen participation is
crucial to good government.
Mr. Voss is in favor of housing maintenance, and feels the City
needs to clean up rental and abandoned property. The image of
Mound has improved.
Mr. Voss's understanding of what "advisory board to the City
Council" means is that final decisions are made by the City Coun-
cil. His determination of a "hardship" would be that the change
will fit into the scheme of the area, it should not destroy a
neighbors view or their rights.
Results of Interviews for Vacancies on the Planninq Commission.
The Commissioners briefly discussed 'the applicants, it was
determined that the Commissioners would vote via secret bal lot
gi v ing the most favorable appl i cant a 3, the next favorable a 2,
and the next a I. It was a unanimous decision that Michael Muei-
ier was the most favorable applicant, and Will lam Voss was the
next favorable.
MOTION made by Thai, seconded by Clapsaddle to recommend
to the City Council that Michael Mueller be appointed
for a 3 year term beginning !-1-90 and expiring 12-31-
92, and in addition assume the balance of Vern
Andersen's term which expires 12-3]-89; and William Voss
be appointed to serve the remainder of Brad Sohns term
which will expire 12-31-90. Motion carried unanimously.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council on
November 14, 1989.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 12, 1989
Page Two
Mr. Selle's understanding of what "advisory board to the City
Council" means is to give the Planning Commission's decisions to
the City Council, and they will rule. His determination of a
hardship would depend on how the change would impact the neigh-
borhood.
c. Bill Voss, 4619 Kildare Road
Mr. Voss explained that he has flexible hours with work, there-
Fore, meeting attendance is no problem. He has served on several
boards and volunteered for many organizations such as the Depart-
ment of Corrections Advisory Board for Hennepin County, the
Wayzata Chapter of Demolay Parents Club, Civil Human Rights Com-
mission, Wayzata Masons and others involving his line of work as
a law enforcement officer. He believes citizen participation is
crucial to good government.
Mr. Voss is in favor of housing maintenance, and Feels the City
needs to clean up rental and abandoned property. The image of
Mound has improved.
Mr. Voss's understanding of what "advisory boarO to the City
Council" means is that final decisions are made by the City Coun-
cil. His determination of a "hardship" would be that the change
will fit into the scheme of the area, it should not destroy a
neighbors view or their rights.
Results of Interviews for Vacancies on the Planninq Commission.
The Commissioners briefly discussed 'the applicants. It was
determined that the Commissioners would vote via secret ballot
giving the most favorable applicant a 3, the next favorable a 2,
and the next a 1. It was a unanimous decision that Michael Muel-
ler was the most favorable applicant, and William Voss was the
next favorable.
MOTION made by Thai, seconded by Clapsaddle to recommend
to the City Council that Michael Muel let be appointed
For a 3 year term beginning 1-1-90 and expiring 12-31-
92, and in addition assume the balance of= Vern
Andersen's term which expires 12-31-89; and Wiliiam Voss
be appointed to serve the remainder of Brad Sohns term
which will expire 12-31-90. Motion carried unanimously.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council on
November 14, 1989.
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE ~
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
November 13, 1989
Present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners GeoFF Michael, Ken
Smith, Frank Weiland, William Thai, and derry Clapsaddle, Council
Representative Ltz densen, Building OFFicial Jan Bertrand, City
Manager Ed Shukle, and Secretary Peggy'James. Absent and excused
were: Commissioners Ken Smith and Frank Weiland.
INTERVIEWS FOR VACANCIES ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Those present For the interviews were: Mayor Steve Smith,
Councilmember: Liz densen, Skip Johnson, and Andrea Ahrens, Plan-
ning Commissioners: Chair Bill Meyer, GeoFF Michael, Jerry Clap-
saddle, and Bill Thai.
Michael Mueller~ 5910 Ridqewood Road
Mr. Mueller stated that he is willing to Invest his time to at-
tend commission meetings, and since he is self-employed can ar-
range his schedule accordingly. He is concerned with the en-
vironment of Mound relating to waste management and wildlife
preservation. He Feels the City needs to promote their ideas and
Issues through public awareness. He believes the Image of Mound
is improving and that the lake is a good asset to the City since
51% of the houses on Lake Minnetonka are in the Westonka School
District.
The Commissioners questioned Mr. Mueller on potential conflict of
Interest. Mr. Mueller stated that he would abstain From any vote
that directly related to any case which he is involved tn. He
stated that he has good ethics and believes tn being Fair.
Mr. Mueller supports truth in housing, and explained that he is
involved with the Minneapolis Board oF Realtors and is Chairman
on the Truth in Housing Code Sub-committee. He believes in
growth for the City, however, is aware that we are a bedroom com-
munity. ..
Mr. Mueller's understanding of being an "advisory board to the
City Council" is to explore subject issues and make recommenda-
tions. Mueller determined a "hardship" should be evaluated by
how a change may affect the neighborhood.
b. Terry Selle, 2675 Westedge Blvd.
Mr. Selle stated that he is Secretary of Westonka Lions Club and
is very committed member, he added that he would also be just as
committed to the Planning Commission. He is a 13 year resident
of Mound and would like to get involved with the City. He would
like the City to grow so it can produce a higher tax revenue,
such as creating more industry. He believes the image of Mound
has--in~oroved,, however-housing in Mound could be up-graded.
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 9, 1989
Present were: Chair Mariiyn Byrnes, Commissioners Nell Weber.
Tom Casey, Steve Burke, Shirley Andersen, Nancy Clough and Brian
Asteson; Council Representative Phyllis Jessen; Park Director Jim
Fackler; Citv Manager, Ed Shukle, Dock Inspector, Dell Rudolph,
and Secretary Peggy James. Absent and excused was: Commissioner
Cathy mai ty.
The ¢ollowing citizens were also in attendance: Janet Johnson,
Brian Johnson, Mark Schiel, Jim Ostman. Kay Ostman, Bryan Clem,
Paul Glynn, Donna Easthouse, Gayle Grady, Skip Jonnson, Harvey
Reder, Carolyn Schmidt, Cliff Schmidt, non Johnson, Jim Grady,
Doug Easthouse, Gert Gerold, Don Henry, Claudia Henry, Ken
Hasselfeidt.
Chair Byrnes called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Minutes
The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of October 12,
were presented for changes and/or additions.
1989
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Asleson to approve
the Park Commission Minutes of October 12, 1989 as writ-
ten. Motion carried unanimously.
Dock Location MaR
The Park Director, Jim Fackler, reported that there are no
changes being proposed from the 1989 map. Me surmised that there
are 443 dock sites listed on the map, however only 360 of these
sites will be usable in 1990 due 'to the Iow water level. Fackler
also reviewed the number of docks located on City parks.
Chair Byrnes asked 'the citizens present if anyone wished to speak
on the issue. Gert Gerold of 4600 Manchester Road questioned if
docks could be installed on the property by the Black Lake
bridge. Fackler explained that this property is either County or
privately owned.
non Johnson of 4416 Dorchester Road questioned why there was ever
a problem with the docks being located at Avalon Park. Chair
Byrnes explained the history of the Avalon dock issue. Council-
member Skip Johnson asked to speak on the issue o¢ Avalon Park.
Skip explained that he raised the issue at a council meeting
since he was aware at one time that the park was owned by an as-
sociation and they did not want docks at the park. Johnson ex-
plained that when the area was used as a swimming beach it had a
nice sand bottom, however, lack of use and dredging from Goose
Park Commission Minutes
November 9, 1989
Page Two
Island has destroyed the sand bottom which is now covered with a
soot type material. He stated that the docks dominate the park
and have changed the usage of the park. Johnson added that after
the docks were installed at Avalon, lO0 people signed a petition
to remove the docks and limit the use of the park. aryan Clem of
4464 Manchester confirmed that there was a petition dated May 4,
1982 and it did have 100 signatures on it.
Gert Gerold stated that she uses Avalon park, however does not
have a dock or a boat. She has a day care with twelve children
and would like to see a bench or picnic table and some playground
equipment at the park. She stated that the kids walk on the
docks because their is nothing else to do at the park. She added
that the docks are not a problems, however, the park needs equip-
ment.
Fackler informed the Commission that there is a very Iow turnover
rate for the dock holders at Avalon, there is a limited amount of
dock space available for non-abutting property owners on the is-
land.
Ron Johnson added that it would be nice to have a picnic table or
bench at the park. He also questioned if 'the well could be made
usable again, he believes the casing is still there.
Cliff Schmidt of 3001 Island View Drive stated that the docks are
dangerous for the kids. Jim Ostman of 2945 Island View Drive
stated that 'the older kids fish from the docks.
Chair Byrnes read a letter written by Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspec-
tor, recommending 'that the Oocks remain at Avalon Park.
Donna Easthouse of 3042 Island View Drive stated that she helped
walk the petition in 1982 and would prefer to see Avalon Park
used for a swimming beach.
Weber questioned Fackler on the possibility of relocating the
dock holders at Avalon. Fackler stated that it would be almost
impossible, especially due to the Iow water, and since the dock
holders are non-abutting residents, a relocation would mean that
their docks could be across town. He added that their is a high
demand From non-abutting property owners for dock sites.
MOTION made by Asleson, seconded by Burke to approve the
Dock Inspector's recommendation for approval of the 1990
Dock Location Map as submitted. Motion carried unanim-
ously.
Park Commission Minutes
November ~, 1~89
Page Three
Asleson added that it was baO timing to request the removal of
these City docks when the water is so low and docks are high in
demand. In addition, the LMCD may freeze the number of dock
sites for the City o¢ Mound at our current number of Oocks,
therefore, it is not favorable to eliminate any dock sites at
this time.
This issue will be reviewed by the City Council on November 14,
1989.
1990 DOCK LOCAl'[ON MAP
There are no changes from the 1989 Dock Location Map.
1990 Total Dock Sites 443
abutting
non-abutting
] '19
264
Non-usable docks due to Iow water
abutting
non-abutting
1990 Total Usable Dock Sites
abutting
non-abutting usable dock sites
-83
360
-13
-70
166
buoys 6
11/89
INVENTORY OF CITY DOCKS LOCATED ON THE ISLAND
Total Number of Dock Sites on the Island
108 abutting
69 non-abutting
177
Number of Unusable Dock Sites Due to Low Water
6 abutting
16 non-abutting
22
Nuli~ber of Usable Dock Sites Available for 1990
102 abutting
53 non-abutting
155
NovemOer 9. 1989
PARKS WITH COMMONS DOCKS
# of # of Dock
Name of Park/Be~O Qpc~D Holders
Centerview Beach 11 17
Carlson Park 9 11
Avalon Park 5 9
Mound Bay I (transit)
Twin Park 5 6
Ridgewood Park 7 11
Lagoon Park 4 4
Cresent Park 17 23
Lost Lake Park 6 6
Highland End ___9. J.~
74 98
Playground Swimming
X
The City of Mound has 23 parks, I0 of these Parks have city
docks. Only 6 oF the 98 dock sites belong to abutting dock
holders.