1989-11-28CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M.t TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 1989
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 14, 1989,
REGULAR MEETING
3. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
4. PUBLIC HEARING: PRESENTATION OF 1990 BUDGET
Pg. 3532-3536
Pg. 3537
5. CASE NO. 89-845
e
BRIGHTON BLVD.
MC COMB.
REQUEST TO MOVE A HOUSE FROM 3005
TO 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD FOR BRUCE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AN
AMENDMENT TO SECTION 300:25 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE
RELATING TO THE MOVING OF BUILDINGS
CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING MODIFICATION TO ALLOW
STORAGE OF PUBLIC WORKS MATERIALS AT THE EAST AND
WEST SIDES OF CITY HALL.
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
Pg. 3538-3569
Pg. 3570
Pg. 3571-3585
9. REQUEST FROM WES OLSEN, 2539 EMERALD DRIVE, TO
EXTEND RESOLUTION #88-179.
10. APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 437:15
OF THE MOUND CITY CODE RELATING TO DOCK DESIGN
STANDARDS
11. APPROVAL OF 1990 DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION~ORMS~
AND FEES --
~2. APPROVAL OF PARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION NOT TO
- RENEW A DOCK PERMIT FOR THE YEAR 1990 AND 1991
DOCK SITE #60700, TODD MC MASTER, 5235 PHELPS RD.
13. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY
PROJECT NO. 8926 (STOPLIGHT AT COMMERCE BLVD.
AND LYNWOOD BLVD.) CITY ENGINEER WILL HAVE UPDATE
REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE - WESTONKA POOL
BOOStErS ~
!
Pg. 3586-3590
Pg. 3591
Pg. 3592-3596
Pg. 3597-3600
Pg. 3601
Pg. 3602-3603
PAGE 3530
15. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CALL OF 1972 IMPROVEMENT
BONDS, A PART OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE
FUND. (SEE ATTACHED MEMO. CITY ATTORNEY WILL
DISTRIBUTE RESOLUTION TUESDAY EVENING.)
16. CANCELLATION OF DECEMBER 26, 1989 MEETING
17. RESOLUTION: "CITIES FIGHT BACK AGAINST DRUGS WEEK"
"8. APPOINTMENT OF BEN MARKS TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION.
19. PAYMENT OF BILLS
20.INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
ae
OCTOBER 1989 FINANCIAL REPORT AS PREPARED BY
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Be
LETTER TO GENO HOFF FROM THE MOUND FARMER'S
MARKET AND COMMUNITY SERVICES REGARDING GENO'S
COOPERATION ON INSTALLING THE FARMER'S MARKET
SIGN DOWNTOWN.
C. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 9, 1989
De
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER
13, 1989
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES OF
NOVEMBER 16, 1989
Pg. 3604-3607
Pg. 3608
Pg. 3609
Pg. 3610-3624
Pg. 3625-3626
Pg. 3627
Pg. 3628-3632
Pg. 3633-3637
Pg. 3638-3639
PAGE 3531
HOUND CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 16, 1989
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, November 14, 1989, 7:30 PM, in the
Council Chambers at 5341Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also
present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., Deputy City
Clerk Linda Strong, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer
John Cameron, Building Official Jan Bertrand, and the following
interested citizens: Eldo Schmidt, Lois and Doug Dion, Michael
Mueller, Brian Johnson, Cliff and Carolyn Schmidt, Kay and Jim
Ostman, Geoff Michael, Bill Thal and Jerry Clapsaddle.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in
attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to approve the Minutes
of the October 24, 1989, Regular Meeting as submitted. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE 98q-847: MOUND HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 2020
COMMERCE BLVD. BLOCKS 1, 2, & 4, MISC. LOTS, LAKESIDE PARK A.L.
CROCKER,S, PID ~13-117-24 32 0030. FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE
Jan Bertrand, Building Official, summarized this item stating the
Planning Commission recommended approval for a 6' fence made of
see-through material.
Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~89-1ql
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO ALLOW A FENCE HEIGHT
VARIANCE FOR 2020 COMMERCE BLVD. (P & Z
NO. 89-847)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CASE
SCOT A. MC KENZIE - FENCE
City Manager Ed Shukle stated that this request was denied at the
October 24, 1989 meeting. Council had asked the city attorney to
prepare a resolution for the November 14, 1989 meeting.
Jessen moved, Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~89-143
RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST OF SCOT
A. MC KENZIE FOR A FENCE HEIGHT
VARIANCE AT 4861 HANOVER LANE (CASE NO.
89-844)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried·
DISCUSSION: RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ON HOUSING
MAINTENANCE/TRUTH IN HOUSING.
Councilmember Liz Jensen explained that based on a joint meeting
of the Council and the Planning Commission and a public hearing
on how to determine a method to address problems with housing
maintenance, the Commission had come to the following conclusions:
e
We as a community need to do something regarding the
external appearance, maintenance, and safety of some
properties in the City of Mound.
Rental properties are a bigger problem than owner occupied
properties.
In no case should a resident or property owner's rights be
violated by such things as unjustified entry.
Those attending future public hearings on this issue would
like to have a document to review before the meeting.
We need a way to advise potential purchasers about such
things as zoning restrictions, zoning non-conformities, and
water bill balances.
The Planning Commission is requesting the Council to direct staff
to work with the Planning Commission along with the City Attorney
to draft the official document.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to direct staff and
Planning Commission to work together with City Attorney to
prepare a document to be implemented in three phases: (1)
Truth in Housing; (2) Inspection and Licensing of rental
property; and (3) Housing Maintenance Ordinance. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF COMMONS DOCK MAP FOR 1990
City Manager Ed Shukle reviewed the November 9, 1989 minutes of
the Park Commission where the Commission voted to leave the 1990
Dock map as is.
MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to approve the 1990
Commons Dock Map for 1990 as presented. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
REOUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL ON FINANCIAL ASSISTANC£ FOR
DREDGING PROJECT - DOUG DION~ ~9~? BARTLETT ~
Mr. Dion approached the Council with a plan to extend the
proposed City funded dredge of Carlson Park to the 6 private
docks east of Norwood Lane. Funds would be saved if the City
dredge and private dredge could be bid as one project, with the 6
private dock holders to pay their portion. Mr. Dion proposed
that the City should pay a portion of the private dredge since it
would benefit two commons docks in the area. The City's Carlson
Park dredge project is proposed in the 1990 Budget. Council will
consider participating in the private dredge in conjunction with
the discussion on the public dredge during 1990 Budget hearings.
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
The Mayor invited any citizen present to come foward who
to be heard. There was no one.
wished
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT NO.
(STOP LIGHT AT COMMERCE BLVD. AND LYNWOOD BLVD.)
8926
City Manager Ed Shukle stated John Cameron, City Engineer, had
approved the plans from the County. The project was scheduled to
begin in the spring of 1990 and be completed by mid-summer, 1990.
Councilmember Jensen questioned the meaning of "..City agrees to
provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street parking
on those portions of said Project.." Without an exact distance
stated, Council wanted definition. Parking is now allowed on
County Road 15 West by Community Services.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to table item until the
no parking distance is defined by the County. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED 1990 TAX LEVY
City Manager Ed Shukle stated the resolution represents a
proposed levy. The actual levy cannot be any higher than the
proposed levy. The proposed levy is 19.3% higher compared to
1989 due to the fact the the Minnesota Legislature at its special
session shifted $84,000,000 of Local Government Aid (LGA) from
cities to school districts statewide.
Johnson moved, Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~89-1~2
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED 1990
TAX LEVY AT $1,583,795
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
3
LICENSE RENEWALS
The American Legion Post t398 and the Northwest Tonka Lions had
gambling license renewals, the Jock Club has a license renewal
for entertainment and Our Lady of the Lake Catholic School has a
renewal for bingo. OLL also requested waiving the 60 day waiting
period.
MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to approve the license
renewals as presented. The vote was unanimoulsy in favor.
Motion carried.
APPROVAt OF PROCEDURES TO ADMINISTER THE
DATA PRACTICES ACT
MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT
City Manager Ed Shukle referred to Resolution ~89-136, adopted by
the Council on October 10, 1989, to establish this document.
MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Johnson to approve the Public
Document Containing Procedures Adopted by the Responsible
Authority to Administer the Minnesota Government Data
Practices Act. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
pLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR VACANCIES ON COMMISSION
Ed Shukle updated the Council as to the recommendations made by
the Commission.
MOTION by Smith, seconded by Jensen to concur with the
Planning Commission in appointing Michael Mueller to a 3
year term beginning 1-1-90 and expiring 12-31-92, and to
assume the balance of Vern Andersen's term which expires 12-
31-89; and William Voss appointed to serve the remainder of
Brad Sohns' term which will expire 12-31-90. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount
of $218,060.#0, when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS:
A. Department Head monthly reports for October, 1989.
B. L.M.C.D. Representative monthly report for October, 1989.
Letter dated October 30, 1989, from Ruth Franklin,
representative from District F of the Regional Transit Board
(RTC).
Planning Commission Minutes of October 23, 1989
Economic Development Commission minutes of May 17, June 13,
July 6, July 27, September 13, October 3, and October 26,
1989.
REMINDER: Planning Commission interviews will be held on
Monday, November 13, 1989, 7 PM, City Hall. Planning
Commission and City Council will jointly interview
candidates. You have received a mailing on the applicants.
Please bring the resumes with you and be prepared to ask
questions.
REMINDER: EDC interviews will be held at 7 PM prior to the
11-14-89 City Council meeting, jointly with EDC, at City
Hall. Enclosed are the letters and/or resumes. Carolyn
Rosdahl has indicated she has a schedule conflict for 11-14-
89. If you wish, the Council and EDC can select another
date which is convenient. She indicated that if the EDC and
Council wanted to select one of the other applicants, that
would be fine with her also. I told her I would get back to
her with what the EDC and Council want to do.
REMINDER: Committee of the Whole Meeting, Tuesday 11-21-89,
immediately following the tree lighting ceremony downtown.
Mayor Smith will "flip the switch" at 6:30 PM. Meeting
should start by 7:30 PM.
City of Mound Christmas Party, Mound VFW, Saturday, December
2, 1989, 7 PM to Midnight.
REMINDER: LMCD meeting on the Comprehensive Management
Plan, Saturday, December 2, 1989, 7:30 AM to 4:15 PM,
Lafayette Club. This will be a preview of the technical
management plan.
LMCD Mailing
MOTION by Jensen,
8:40 PM. The
carried.
seconded by Ahrens, to adjourn meeting at
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
Edward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager
Linda Strong, Deputy Clerk
11 0130 123
11 0130 241
11 0250 663
11 0550 301
11 0580 211
11 0640 243
11 0700 241
11 0760 033
11 0760 123
11 0850 421
11 0850 511
11 0852 062
11 0880 152
11 0880 571
11 1120 061
11 1390 032
11 1692 755
11 1692 871
11 1750 181
11 1990 241
11 2050 092
11 2050 121
Delinquent Water and Sewer
$ 77.94
267.20
79.35
249.22
142.60
114.00
76.13
152.72
253.14
145.49
101.03
128.41
· 99.47
133.96
162.73
95.06
113.77
173.62
114.36
154.90
120.41
95.08
11/21/89
$3050.59
MINUTES OF A HEETING OF' THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING CONHISSION
November 13, 1989
BOARO OF APPEAL$~
a.
Bruce McComb, Request to Move a house From 3005 Brighton
Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road. PUBLIC HEARING.
Commissioner Thai requested to be removed From the Commission For
discussion on this case as he will abstain From voting. It was
determined that the Commission still had a quorum with 4 oF 7
Commissioners present.
Building OFFicial, Jan Bertrand, questioned the necessity to
review the report as it is lengthy and since it was extensively
reviewed at the October 9th Planning Commission Meeting. Chair
Meyer asked IF any persons present wished to have the Inspector's
Report reviewed, since there was no reply From citizens present,
the report was not reviewed.
Applicant, Bruce McComb, displayed a Eront and side elevation
drawing oF the proposed improved structure as It would be on the
new lot. He also displayed photographs oF all the existing house
on Cumberland. He briefly reviewed the improvements that are to
be made to the home.
Chair Meyer opened the publtc hearing.
Steve Schmtdt oF 2986 Highland Blvd., who owns the property ad-
jacent to the subject address, questioned the Ftnished value oF
the proposed house and the square Footage compared to the other
homes in the neighborhood. Mr. McComb stated that the Finished
square Footage oF the home will be 995 square Feet, and the
proposed Finished value, per two realtors, is $75,900. Steve
Schmldt stated that he does not believe he will even get $70,000
For the home. The Building OFFtclal reviewed the values and
square Footage oF the other homes on Cumberland. It was deter-
mined that the home was comparable in size and value to the other
extsttng homes.
Since no other cttizens wished to speak on the Issue, Chair Meyer
closed the public hearing.
ItOT I ON ~de by I~ I chae I, seconded by C I apsadd I e to recom-
mend approval of the house moving request as so moved In
the motion of October 9, 1989 as roi lows; Recommend ap-
proval of the house moving from 3005 Brighton Blvd. to
4723 Cumberland Road per staff recommendation, excluding
the recommendation to re-configure the warm air ducts to
the outside wal Is and the return air ducts to the Inside
walls, in addition, a bond at 1255 of the proposed
finished value of the house must be obtained In favor of
the City of Hound to ensure consolation of the project.
The house Is to be moved and completed to code by 12-31-
90. The house Is to be constructed with a tuckunder
garage as per the plans submitted by the applicant
(Exhibits A & B). ~lotlon carried 3 to I. Those In
favor,' Clapsaddle, Meyer, and Michael. Those opposed.-
Jansen.
Jensen stated her reason for opposing is that she does not agree
with the omission of the Building Officials recommendation to re-
configure the supply and return air ducts since our City Code
requires that when a structure is moved or relocated it must con-
Form to the requirements for a new structure.
This case will be heard by the City Council on November 28, 1989.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
Case No. 89-845
RESOLUTION #89-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
TO ALLOW THE MOVING OF A HOUSE FROM 3005 BRIGHTON BLVD.
TO 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD
P&Z CASE NO. 89-845
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval to move a
house from: 3005 Brighton Blvd., Mound, Minnesota, Lot 2, Block
15, Arden, PID #24-117-24-44 0173; to: 4723 Cumberland Road,
Mound, Minnesota, North lOl' of Lot 38 and the West 1/2 of Lot
39, Block lO, Pembroke, PID #19-117-23-33 0195.
WHEREAS, the property at which the house is to be moved to
(4723 Cumberland Road) is located within the R-2 Single Family
Zoning District, and
WHEREAS, Section 300:25 regulates criteria for the reloca-
tion of houses In the City of Mound, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request
and does recommend approval. The Planning Commission has found
the proposed building to meet all zoning regulations. The Plan-
ning Commission has approved a plan for the house which will
create a house of the same general character and appearance as
other buildings or structures in the vicinity, and
WHEREAS, When a structure is moved or relocated, it must
conform to the requirements for a new structure under the provi-
sions of the Uniform Building Code, State of Minnesota, Section
104, except for the current energy code requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the relocation of the sub-
ject structure to 4723 Cumberland Road, North lOl' of Lot 38 and
the West 1/2 of Lot 39, Block lO, Pembroke, PID #19-117-23-33
0195, subject to the following:
The following alterations, replacements, and repairs must be made
to the subject structure prior to relocation:
l) An escrow account is to be established with the amount
determined by the City Attorney, to allow the City Attorney
to Oraft a recordable document to assure removal of the
structure on Lots 2, 3, 34, and 35, Block 15, Arden, known
as 3005 Brighton Blvd. A bond at 125% of the proposed
finished value of the house to ensure completion of the
project shall be submitted.
Proposed Resolution
Case No. 89-845
Page Two
2) The house is to be moved and completed to code by 12-31-90.
3)
The house is to be constructed with a tuckunder garage as
per the plans submitted by the applicant (Exhibits A & B
attached). .
4)
A moving permit for the City of Mound must be obtained by a
state licensed house mover in the amount of $50.00 plus
proo~ o~ insurance and cash deposit or bond to move the
structure over City streets.
5)
Yard grading including sodding~ sidewalks,
entry stoops are to be provided.
and new house
6)
A new foundation is required under the structure with beam
and support systems in compliance with the building codes;
this structure will be required to be properly anchored,
damp proofing applied to the foundation walls, and founda-
tion insulation properly placed where necessary.
Construction blueprints are required to permit the approval
of the alterations to fJoor plans (including use of each
room) heating layout, survey, information as per attached~ a
cross section of foundation, and a energy audit by the
utility company.
'~t~8)~y The new site will require two off-street parking spaces (650
~/~ square feet of area minimum), the survey will require an in- -
dilation of a future garage site if an accessory building is
not planned at the time of the building relocation.
~)
F'rovide proper head room~ 3 foot minimum width~ proper
risers and treads for both stairways and handrails to code.
10 )
The exterior of the building has redwood siding w~.th the
paint oeeling? the front door frame is pulling away from the
house, the front door threshold is rotted and needs replac-
ing. Ther~ are aluminum storm and screen windows throughout
the first and second floor~ aluminum storm at the entry
needs the strick:er plate adjusted to assure closing.
The window jams~ s~lls, and sash throughot~lt the building
must be painted and all putty in the windows replaced in-
cluding any broken or cra~ked glass. The light and ven-
tilation requirement for window area is proper and legal for
each of the rooms.
Proposed Resolution
Case No. ~-~-~,4..,
Page Three
The present dormer will be converted back into attic space
in order to meet code.
12)
The woodwork in the building is painted with the paint chip-
ping and peeling throughout the structure. All woodwork in-
cluding interior doors must be refinished with sanding and
two coats of paint. '[he kitchen cabinets and cupboards are
press-board and are in proper working order.
13 )
The drywall throughout the Ouilding has cracks and the seams
and nails are showing on the drywall. All drywall and
plaster shall be patched, sanded, and painted with a perm
rated paint on the interior of exterior walls and ceilings.
The structure will need to be thoroughly cleaned with the
wails washed, scraped, and painted; carpet and flooring
cleaned; and all windows washed throughout. Any building
appliances that will be re-used including exhaust fans and
filters, must be in working order and tested.
14)
The roo~ing material, fascia and soffit boards must be re-
placed. The current masonry chimney has a stainless steel
liner. A fireplace stove ~s intended to be used w~th the
current chimney. The gas forced air furnace will require
new Class B chimney for venting through the roof.
15)
The floor joists are 2'"x8"' 16" O.C. for the second floor in
portions visible, and the first floor joists are 2'"x10'" 16"
O.C. All supports, beams, and posts, including any cut or
notched members must be repaired when the home is relocated.
16)
'[he existing plumbing pipes are cast iron waste and vent
with copper and some galvanized water piping. All waste and
vent, water pipe including sizing, must be brought to mini-
mum code upon relocation. The water flow from each of the
fixtures must meet minimum code as it appears some of the
galvanized lines are clogged. The water heater appears to
be about one or two years old, the water softener is five to
ten years old, and the electric range and exhaust hood are
approximately ten to fifteen years old. ]'he house has
electric base-board heaters in addition to forced air gas
furnace. The forced a~r gas furnace appears to be ap-
proximately five years old w~th proper' operation and vent
stack, however, the furnace must be supplied with combustion
air and the existing air conditioning and compressor
removed.
Proposed Resolution
Case No. 89-845
Page Four
15)
There is a 100 amp electrical serv~ce to the existing build-
ing, however, service grounding is necessary, ground ~ault
interruptions~ smoke alarms at each level wired on a
separate circuit interconnected, and grounding o~ all out-
lets must be supplied when the home is relocated to meet
current code.
This request to relocate a house within the City of Mound is
granted ~or the ~ollowing legally described property:
North 101' o~ Lot 38 and the West 1/2 of Lot
39, Block 109, Pembroke, PID #19-117-23-:3:3
0195.
ClYY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
CITY of MOUND
53.:', MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364
{612) 472-1155
CASE NO. Bg-B45
INFORMAL NOTICE TO CONSIDER A HOUSE MOVING REQUEST FOR
THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS NORTH 101' OF LOT 38 &
W I/2 OF LOT 39, BLOCK 10, PEMBROKE, PlO 19-117-23-33
0195, 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning and Zoning Commission
of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Cham-
bers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, November 13,
1989 to consider a house moving request. The Subject house is to
be moved From 3005 Brighton Blvd., Lot 2, Block 15, Arden, PID
#24-117-24-44 0173, to 4723 Cumberland Road, legally described
North I01' of Lot 38 and W 1/2 of SLot 39, Block !0,
Pembroke, PID #19-117-23-33 0195.
All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above
will be heard at this meeting.
c.
Francene C. Clark, City~ Clerk
Mailed to property owners within 350' on I 1-3-89.
An aqua~ 0~p0rtundy Employer that does not d,scr~mmate on the basis of race. color natl0nal or~gin, or hanchcalDDec status
m meadm,ss,0n or access',c or trea!me~cr employment in, ~ts programs and acDvmes
169
October 24, 1989
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 24, 1989
~ASE ~89-845:
~RUCE He COMB~ 3005 BRIGHTON BLVD, HOUSE MOVING -
4723 CUMBERLAND ROXD, NORTH 101' OF LOT 38 & W
OF LOT 39f BLOCK 10, PEMBROKEf PID ~19-117-23
0195
The City Planner explained the request. The Planning Commission
recommended approval, subject to alterations, replacements and
repairs being made to the structure prior to relocation. They
also recommended requiring a bond at 125% of the proposed
finished value of the house to ensure completion of the project.
Mr. McComb was present and explained his proposal to the Council.
The Council discussed the procedures involved in moving a house.
The ordinance is vague and does not set out a policy on how these
issues should be handled. They discussed notification of all
persons within 350 feet of the proposed site where the house is
to be moved and decided that those people should be notified
also.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by &hrens to table this
issue until the November 28, 1989, Council Meeting and refer
the item back to the Planninq Commission for a public hear-
inq and notif~ all the property owners within 350 feet of
the proposed site where the house would be moved. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Planning Commission Minutes
October g, l~g
Page Two
Case Np~ 89-845: Bruce M~C_Q~D, Present Location 3005 ~~
ton Blvd.~ Propo~eO Location 4723 CumberlanO Road~ North
101' of Lot 38 & the W__LI~2 of Lot 39~ Block 10, Pembroke_~
~ID #19-117-23-033 0195. HOUSE MOvinG. "
Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicant's request
to move a house from 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road.
The appllcant is also requesting approval to reside in the house
to be moved at Its present location until he can build a new home
on the same property. When his new home is complete, he will
then move the house to the Cumberland address. Bertrand sug-
gested establishing and escrow account to allow the City Attorney
to record a document on the property with bonOtng to assure
removal of the present structure a~ter occupancy of the new.
Bertrand reviewed the current statistics of the subject house,
and the required Improvements. The effective age of the struc-
ture Is 1942 with a current square footage of 770.
Applicant, Bruce McComb, displayed to the Commission a front and
side elevation drawing of the proposed improved structure as It
would be on the new lot. He also displayed photographs o~ all
the existing houses on that block o~ Cumberland. Bruce pointed
out that all but two of the homes on that block of Cumberland
have tuckunder garages, the same as he Is proposing to do.
Planning Commission Mtnutes
October 9, 1989
Page Three
McComb requested that he be allowed to turn the dormer back into
an attic, since tt would be too difficult to bring It to code to
use as a dormer due. to the ceiling height and proper doorways.
in addition, he requested that the existing base-board heat be
allowed to rematn, he feels It is adequate. He explained that he
ts creating a marketable starter home. He stated that he has
received bids from two moving companies, and each said that the
house would be easy to move because it is structurally sound and
it is small. He added that he considered adding onto the house
at Its present location, however, tt currently sits lO feet from
the road, therefore will always be a nonconforming structure and
would only cause problems.
Clapsaddle noted that the applicant Otd not have a site plan for
the new location on Cumberland, he commented that he would like
the house to be placed on the lot to allow room for future expan-
sion In order to alleviate a hardship'for the future owners.
Jansen commented that she needed more information, such as the
value of the surrounding homes, and the square footage of the
homes. McComb stated that his house would have approximately
I,ZO0 square feet of usable floor area when tt Is finished.
HOTION n~:le by Michael, seconded by Clapsacldle, to ap-
prove the house moving from 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723
Cun~erland Road per staff recommendation, excluding the
recommendation to re-configure the warm air ducts to the
outside walls and the return air ~ucts to the Instde
walls. In addition, a bond at 125% of the proposed
flnlshecl value of the house must be obtatned In favor of
the City of Hound to ensure co,~letlon of the project.
The house Is to be moved and completed to code by
90. The house Is to be constructed with a tuckunder
garage as per the plans submitted by the applicant
(Exhibits A & B). Notion carried 6 to I. (Those In
favors Clapseddle, Welland, Thai, Neyer, Smith, and
Hlchaell those ~sed= Jensen.)
McComb stated that he is in agreement with the motion.
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 24, 1989.
CITY ()f MOUNI)
5341 MAYWOOD FtOAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
(612; 472-!~55
CASE NO. 89-845
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
Jan 8ertrand, Building Official ¢
Planning Commission Agenda of October 9, 1989
CASE NO.: 89-845
APPLICANT: Bruce A. McComb
PRESENT LOCATION: 3005 Brighton Blvd., Mound
PROPOSED LOCATION: 4723 Cumberland Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
North 101' of Lot 38 & the W. l/Z of Lot 39,
Block 10, Pembroke, PID #19-117-23-33 0195
SUBJECT: House Relocation from 3005 Brighton Blvd.
ZONING OF PROPOSED LOCATION: R-2 Single Family Residential
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to relocate a home on his
property at 3005 Brighton Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road. Part of
his application would be a request to build a new home on the
property on Brighton Blvd. prior to the relocation of the home.
After the home is built and ready for occupancy, his intention is
to relocate the house currently on the property to the Cumberland
Road address. If the home is not relocated prior to building a
new structure on his property, I would suggest establishing an
escrow account to allow the City Attorney to record a document on
the property with bonding to assure removal of the present struc-
ture after occupancy of the new.
The effective age of this structure is 1942, with a current
square footage of ??0. The Hennepin County Property Appraiser's
records are attached as well as the tax statement for this
property. The structure's minimum useable floor area is 840
square feet.
When a structure is moved or relocated, it must conform to the
requirements for a new structure under the provisions of the
Uniform Building Code, State of Minnesota, Section 104, except
for the current energy code requirements. The State Legislature
Case No. 89-845
Page Two
recently passed a law allowing an energy audit to be made of an
existing structure when being relocated. I made an Inspection of
the existing conditions of the home on September 25, 1989, and
have found the following alterations, replacements, and repairs
which must be made to the structure tf relocated within the City
of Mound.
1)
A moving permit for the City of Mound must be obtained by a
state licensed house mover in the amount of $50.00 plus
proof of insurance and cash deposit or bond to move the
structure over City streets.
Z)
Yard grading including sodding, sidewalks, and new house
entry stoops are to be provided.
3)
A new foundation would be required under the structure with
beam and support systems in compliance with the building
codes; this structure will be required to be properly an-
chored, damp proofing applied to the foundation walls, and
foundation insulation properly placed where necessary.
4)
Construction blueprints will be required to permit the ap-
proval of the alterations to floor plans (including use of
each room) heating layout, survey, Information as per
attached; a cross section of foundation, and a energy audit
by the utility company.
5)
The new site will require two off-street parking spaces (650
square feet of area minimum); the survey would require an
indication of a future garage site if an accessory building
is not planned at the time of the building relocation.
6)
Provide proper head room, 3 foot minimum width, proper
risers and treads for both stairways and handrails to code.
7)
The second floor of the structure does not have a minimum
ceiling height of 7'6" in 50% of the Floor area which will
require alterations to the roof structure. The existing
roof has Z'x4' members 16" O.C.
The exterior of the building has redwood siding with the paint
peeling, the front door frame is pulling away from the house, the
front door threshold is rotted and needs replacing. There are
aluminum storm and screen windows throughout the first and second
floor, aluminum storm at the entry needs the stricker plate
adjusted to assure closing. The window jams, sills, and sash
Case No. 89-845
Page Three
throughout the building must be painted and all putty in the win-
dows replaced including any broken or cracked glass. The light
and ventilation requirement for window area is proper and legal
for each of the rooms.
There are no doors Into the second floor bedrooms at this time.
There is ltmited space at the top landing of the stairs to
provide doors into each of these rooms. Doors should be provided
to allow For privacy Into these two bedrooms.
The woodwork in the building is painted with the paint chipping
and peeling throughout the structure. All woodwork including in-
terior doors must be refinished with sanding and two coats of
paint. The kitchen cabinets and cupboards are press-board and
are in proper working order.
The floor coverings throughout the structure are tn good condi-
tion. The ceramic tile tn the bathroom is in good condition.
The drywall throughout the building has cracks and the seams and
nails are showlng on the drywall. All drywall and plaster shall
be patched, sanded, and painted with a perm rated paint on the
interior of exterior wails. The structure will need to be
thoroughly cleaned with the walls washed, scraped, and painted;
carpet and flooring cleaned; and all windows washed throughout.
Any building appliances that will be re-used including exhaust
fans and filters, must be in working order and tested.
The roofing material, fascia and soffit boards must be replaced.
The current masonry chimney has a stainless steel liner. A
fireplace stove is intended to be used with the current chimney.
The gas Forced air Furnace wi11 require new Class B chimney For
venting through the roof.
The floor joists are 2'x8' 16" O.C. for the second floor in por-
tions visible, and the first floor joists are 2'xlO' 16" C.C.
AIl supports, beams, and posts, Including any cut or notched mem-
bers must be repaired if the home is relocated.
The existing plumbing pipes are cast iron waste and vent with
copper and some galvanized water piping. All waste and vent,
water pipe including sizing, must be brought to minimum code upon
relocation. The water flow from each of the fixtures must meet
minimum code as it appears some of the galvanized lines are
clogged. The water heater appears to be about one or two years
old, the water softener is five to ten years old, and the
electric range and exhaust hood are approximately ten to Fifteen
years old. The house has electric base-board heaters in addition
Case No. 89-845
Page Four
to forced air gas furnace. The forced air gas furnace appears to
be approximately ftve years old with proper operation and vent
stack, however, the furnace must De supplied with combustion air
and the existing air conditioning and compressor removed. The
supply and return air ducts are the older style with the supply
air on the ~nstde walls and the return air on the outside wal~s.
The duct work should be re-configured to supply the warm air to
the outside walls and the return air to the inside wal~s.
There is a 100 amp electrical service to the existing building,
however, service grounding is necessary, ground Fault interrupt-
ions, smoke alarms at each level wired on a separate circuit In-
terconnected, and grounding of all outlets must be supplied when
the home is relocated to meet current code.
If you have any further questions regarding the notification to
the neighbors, or this report, please contact the Building
Department before Friday, October 6th.
The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be
referred to the City Council on October 24, 19Bg.
''
CITY
5~41
Permit must be posted ~ith moving vehicle.
PERMIT NO.:
DATE:
FEE:
(House $50 / Garage $10)
Ai~ICATION FOR .OVING A BUILDING
(Please print or type the following Information.)
Name of Applicant ~CF. A, t~cCo~tl~ Day Phone 13~-&J~
Present location of building:
Owner of Property: ~)~-~D jJ~- J~tc-~4ll-t~
Address ~OO~ ~k~~ ~ml
A~itton ~[~ ~~G[O~ Plat
Block
Day Phone
PID
Proposed location of building=
Owner of Property= ~~c[c+G~NC~- C~kt~-- Day Phone
A~ress ~~ ~~R~ ~oAO Block JO
A~itlon ~G~KE ~~o~ Plat PID
Di~nslons-of Bulldin~ Length ~1 bi) ;Wtdth_ ~l_ Height I~/'
To be mved (out of . into ,,, or within X ) the City of Mound.
Pr~sed Route= ~tGt~ ~ ~~ ~0 ~~ ~g~
TI~ of ~ve= ~~ How long to be on StPee~=
Weight o6 vehicle= Weight o6 I~d= Total Weight:
T~e DE meth~ to secure I~dJ
I~TA~= 48 HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO HOVlNG STRUCTURE TO ~LICE DEPARTHENT.
CALL 472-37ll BETWEEN 8=00 AH AND 4~30 PH (AFTER HOURS 544-951l).
UTILITIES WARNING NOTICE~ 454-0002
TO INSURE AGAINST DAHAGE TO STREETS
DE.SIT REQUIRED OF ~ _
(de~sl~ wrll be re~urnea I~ nd da~ge has occured).
INSURANCE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED= Htnlmum amount DE B.I. $200.000/
~600.000. P.D. $50.000. or.ash BGnd $l,000
Lotw~_~ ~Y- o~ urr ~Q
Y/Applicant's signature Date
APPROVED BY: Bldg Official__ Police
Received: State License Insurance Certificate
Mover
Distribution: Bldg Official__ P~lice Cheil__ Public Works
RELEASE OF BOND APPROVED:
Public Works Director, 47Z-IZSI
Date
House Movinq Request
Bruce McC~-~b
Proposed Site: 4723 Cumberland Road
4723 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0195
Lot 38 & !/2 oF 39. BIk lO
address unassigned
19-117-23-33 0109
Lot 37 & 0/36. Blk l0
4733 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0108
Lot 35 & 0/36, BIk 10
3000 Orury Lane
19-117-23-33 0107
Lots 31, 32, 33, 34, BIk 10
4715 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0196
Lot 40 & 1/2 39, BIk 10
4711 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0191
Logt 41 & 42, BIk 10
address unassigned
19-ll7-23-33 0192
Lot 43 & p/44, BIk 10
4669 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-33 0193
LKots 44 & 45, Blk I0
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0088
Lots 6, 7, 26, & 27, BIk 8
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0087
Lots 4, 5, 28. & 29, BIk 8
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0096
Lots 30 & 3], 81k 8
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0097
Lot 32. p/31 & p/vac, st., Blk 8
address unassigned
19-117-23-32 0189
Lot 16 & p/17, Blk 8
4674 Cumberland Road
19-117-23-32 0190
Lot 18, p/17 & P/19, Blk 8
Land
7,500
_House_ Tota I
9,000
16.000 56,800 72,800
18,000 48,200 66,200
15,000 48,900 63,900
16,000 44,600 60,600
9.000
(subdivision approved by City
Council i0-10-89, new house is
proposed to be bui)t)
16,000 53,500 69,500
9,500
9,500
4,000
4,000
7,500
15,000 62,300 77,300
i
1 ¥I.,LIIy.i
X X
.3 []
i i
1
'^ Ill '1¥1.].1:i¥d
X
X
x x
I-
x x
._o~ o
)',. ~: 0
13. bi- U.,I
iX X
P
~ D x x x x
° I
L
1
Cl. I, UJ
iI
(2)
14
B~UN!
RI(:
DOR(
:171:
IdANCHESIER
RD
(~
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
HOUND ADV l SORY PLANN I NG CONM 1 SS [ ON
November 13, 1989
c. Amendment to House Moving Ordinance.
The Con~nissioners discussed the need For the house moving or-
dinance to be amended to require public hearings. Bertrand sug-
gested that the public hearing requirements be the same as those
used when processing a Conditional Use Permit, Section 23.505.3.
In addition, It was determined that an application Fee should be
established, it was suggested that the Fee be the same as that
For a Conditional Use, which Is $200.
MOTION made by Thai, seconded by Meyer to recon~nend to
the City Council that City Code Section 300=25 relating
to Moving of Buildings, Subd. 3. be amended to reclulre a
public hearing using the same requirements In City Code
Section 23.505.3. In addition, a zoning application Fee
of $200 shall be required For any house moving request.
Motion carried unanimously.
5'"7o
NINUTES OF A NEETING OF THE
HOUND ADVISORY PLANNING CONNISSION
Octo~er 23, 1989
~o~sideration of a Zoninq ~iFtcation to allow Storage__o.~
Public Works Materials at the East and West sides oF Citv
Hall. PUBL.I~_.~EARING.
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the background of possiOly
having outside storage For public works materials at the east and
west sides of city hall. He explained that there are two
separate tasks which the Planning Commission needs to complete,
they are:
Issue #1: Provide a recommendation to the City Council on the
~x~ssibility of establishing outd~r storage areas to the east and
west of the city hall building.
Issue ~: Regardless oF the Commission's recommendation on Issue
#1 above, provide a recommended zoning modification to accom-
modate the outdoor storage at the city hall site.
Koegler reviewed Issue #I First. He stated that the proposed
city hall site will accommodate only a portion of the city's to-
tal requirement For outside storage. Therefore, IF the city
hall site is Implemented, additional storage sites will sttll be
needed. In addition, he explained other problems with the site,
such as: setback requirements which would eliminate one of the
Five bays as planned, the significant amount of grading neeOed,
removal of all existing vegetation, environmental concerns relat-
ing to drainage, and the cost.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1989
Page Two
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission determine that the
sites located both east and west of the existing city shall are
unsuitable For storage of public works materials. Factors in-
Fluencing this recommendation include the Following:
The proposed use is inconsistent with city hall and the sur-
rounding wetland environment at Lost Lake due to the in-
ability of the sites to adequately handle on-site storm
drainage retention·
Both sites (and particularly the western site) are in-
herently unsuitable for the proposeO use due to topography
and tree cover·
The cost of improvements to establish the(~wo s not
justifiable since three other sites including q,~ke will
still be needed to accommodate public works storage·
The Commission had no comments, therefore Chair Meyer opened the
public hearing.
The Following citizens spoke against having outside storage at
city hall: Don Jerdee, Dennis Stahlbusch, Marcia Jerdee, Fred
Hanley, Connie Hanley, Ben Marks. 'Some of the comments made by
these citizens were: there is not enough space anyway, it is not
Feasible, the potential noise of the trucks next to residential
property, and the property is very beautiful with the trees now,
so why ruin it. It was noted that a majority of the citizens
present were against the proposed site· No one spoke in Favor of
having the outside storage at city hall·
The Bickman site and Lost Lake site were reviewed as potential
storage sites· No one spoke in opposition to having the
materials stored at Lost Lake.
Chair Meyer closed the public hearing.
I~OTION ~e by Thai, seconded by I~eiland, to recommend
to the City Council that the city hall site not be con-
sidered for the outdoor storage of publ lc works
materials as the Planning Con~ission agrees with staff
mecommenclat i on. I~ot i on camm i ed unan i mous I y.
Koegler reviewed his recommendation for Issue #2. He explained
that city hall is currently zoned R-I. The only district
presently allowing any type of outdoor storage is the l-l, In-
dustrial district, which allows "storage of rock and stone
products" by conditional use. To be consistent with the intent
of the overall zoning code, staff Feels that the B-I zone is the
potential vehicle For accommodating the proposed use.
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23, 1989
Page Three
Staff recommendeO that the Planning Commission find that if the
City Council eventually finds that no other reasonable alterna-
tive to the city hall site exists for public works storage, the
B-I zoning district shoulO be modified to allow "publicly owned
materials storage areas" as a conditional use. Performance
standards should also be developed to minimize the impact on the
surrounding properties and the natural environment.
The Commission noted that the Lost Lake property is zoned B-I.
Koegler noteO that the outside public storage use at the Lost
Lake site is currently a granOfathered use, however that use can-
not be intensified. It was also noted that the Bickman property
is B-I.
The Commission discussed rezoning city hall to B-I. Marcia
Jerdee, Connie Stahlbusch, and Carol Hanley stated that they
would rather not have city hall rezoned to B-I until after the B-
I zoning district is modified to allow outdoor storage of public
works materials.
The Commission asked for the City Planner's opinion on possibly
rezoning the city hall site to B-t. He suggested leaving city
hall zoned as R-I, the primary reason being the control of the
surrounding residents as they are aware of the uses allowed in a
residential Oistrict. If it is zoned B-I and in the future
relocate city hall, they could sell the city hall building/
property to any business allowed within the B-I district, which
could open up a host of uses.
Chair Meyer closed the public hearing.
The Commission Oetermined that the current R-I zoning for city
hall is sufficient, and that the 0-1 zoning district could be ex-
panded to allow open storage of public works materials as a con-
ditional use.
MOTION n~e by Smith, seconded by Wetland, to recommend
to the City Council that the city hall property not De
rezoned since the R-I zoning distrtct ts sufficient and
desirable for its present use. In addition, the City
Council should look into expanding the B-I zoning dis-
trict to allow outdoor storage of public works materials
as a conditional use with performance standards to be
drafted. I~otion carried unanimously.
These issues will be addressed by the City Council at their meet-
ing on November 28, 1989.
CITY of N?IOUNI)
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND. MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF AN INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A
ZONING MODIFICATION TO ALLOW OPEN STORAGE OF PUBLIC
WORKS MATERIALS AT THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF THE PRESENT
CITY HALL LOCATED AT 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD, LOTS 9 TO 13.
BLOCK 3, SHIRLEY HILL5 UNIT "D", PID #24-117-24-21 0034.
NOTICE I5 HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet In the Council Chambers, 5341
Maywood Road, at ?:30 p.m. on Monday, October 23, 1989. The City
of Mound Is considering a zoning modification to allow open
storage of public works materials at the east and west sides of
the present City Hall building located in the R-I (single family
residential) zoning district at 5341 Maywood Road, legally
described as:
Lots 9 to 13, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit "D", PID #24-
117-24-21 0034.
All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above
will be heard at this meeting.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Published in "The Laker" 10-9-89 & 10-16-89.
property owners within 350 Feet on 10-13-89.
Mailed to abutting
An equal cpp0rtumt~ Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race color qat~0nal 0r,gm or hanc,ca~e2 s';~'.,
,r the adm~ss.~n or access to or treatment or employment ,n ,ts programs and a~',vme5
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner ~
DATE: October 16, 1989
SUBJECT: Public Works Storage
APPLICANT: City of Mound
LOCATION: 5341Maywood Road (East and West of City Hall)
VHS FILE NUMBER: 89-310-A27-ZO
EXISTING ZONING: Single Family Residential (R-l)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND: For the past year, the City of Mound has been seeking
solutions to the problem of permanent storage of public works
materials. Public works materials consist of the items that are
required for normal year round maintenance activities such as sand,
salt, rock, seal coat aggregate, street sweepings, culverts and
other miscellaneous materials. At the present time, most of the
stored material sits on the Lost Lake site fronting on Shoreline
Boulevard. Additional storage occurs at the new public works
building and at the old Island Park facility.
As part of it's continuing effort to address this issue, the Mound
City Council has asked the Planning Commission to complete the
following two tasks:
Provide a recommendation to the City Council on the
possibility of establishing outdoor storage areas to the
east and west of the city hall building.
Regardless of the Commission's recommendation in item #1
above, provide a recommended zoning modification to
accommodate the outdoor storage at the city hall site.
The two issues identified above will be reviewed separately·
ISSUE #1
COMMENTS: The proposed storage on the city hall site will
accommodate only a portion of the city's total requirement.
3030 Harbor Lane North Bldg.ll, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 55447-2175 612/553-1950
Planning Report
October 16, 1989
Page 2
Maintaining current operations practices, the city needs a minimum
of 2 acres for public works storage. If the city hall site is
implemented on both the east and west sides, additional storage
will still need to be provided at the new public works building,
Island Park and Lost Lake. If this proposal is implemented, the
city will have storage on 5 different parcels within the City of
Mound.
Storage to the east and west sides of city hall presents a variety
of problems and issues. The site on the east side will be enclosed
by retaining walls which due to existing grades, will be
approximately 8 feet tall at the northeast corner of the storage
area and close to 10 feet tall at the southeast corner of the area.
On the concept plan, these retaining walls are shown abutting the
property line. Since the walls are above ground structures
totalling more than 8 feet in height along Wilshire Boulevard, they
should comply with the front yard setback requirements of the
district (30'). Compliance with the setback requirements will
essentially eliminate one of the 5 bays in the storage area. Even
if the walls are not subject to the structural setback requirement,
they would need to observe a 30 foot setback in conformance with
Section 23.714 which states site distance requirements for
intersection areas.
The property immediately west of city hall slopes from southeast
to northwest and has a 26 foot differential in elevation from
property corner to property corner. The site contains heavy tree
cover composed primarily of maple and oak species. In order to
utilize the property for storage, three areas would be created with
access to the north and middle area off of an extension of Maywood
Road and access to the southern area from the existing city hall
parking lot. Creation of the storage area would require a
significant amount of grading and would require the total removal
of the existing vegetation.
Both the east and west sites pose two other significant issues:
environmental concerns and cost. The western site is adjacent to
the Lost Lake wetland area. Drainage from the eastern site reaches
Lost Lake via the existing storm sewer system. Storm water runoff
from the storage areas is an important consideration, a
consideration that is even more important if any of the salt
mixture is ever stored on either of the proposed sites. The
storage concept plan for both the east and west sides fully
utilizes the property. Since the sites are fully used, the plan
in its present configuration will not accommodate any on-site
retention ponds to intercept storm water prior to it's entering
either Lost Lake directly or the storm sewer system.
Planning Report
October 16, 1989
Page 3
Cost is another consideration in reviewing the city hall storage
sites. Preliminary cost estimates by the City Engineer have
identified a total improvement cost of $330,000 to construct both
the east and west sites. This cost estimate includes approximately
$90,000 to upgrade Maywood Road.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
determine that the sites located both east and west of the existing
city hall are unsuitable for storage of public works materials.
Factors influencing this recommendation include the following:
The proposed use is inconsistent with city hall and the
surrounding wetland environment at Lost Lake due to the
inability of the sites to adequately handle on-site storm
drainage retention.
Both sites (and particularly the western site) are
inherently unsuitable for the proposed use due to
topography and tree cover.
The cost of improvements to establish the two areas is
not justifiable since three other sites including Lost
Lake will still be needed to accommodate public works
storage.
ISSUE
COMMENTS: Public works storage is a difficult issue to solve in
Mound due to the unavailability of suitable vacant land. Since
suitable vacant land does not exist, the process needs to sort out
the parcel or parcels which are "the most suitable of the
unsuitable", the lesser of evils so to speak. Despite the staff
recommendation on the use of the city hall sites and the eventual
Planning Commission .recommendation on the proposed use, it is
conceivable that the f~al decision may be that the city hall sitest
are, in fact, part of a--p-a-~kage of public works storage areas.I In
on needs t~
p · ' · ln~--th~-z-~-in
vehicle to address this unique situation.
The city hall site is presently zone R-1 which allows public
buildings by conditional use permit but does not allow outside
storage. In Mound, the only district presently allowing any type
of outdoor storage is the I-1, Industrial district which allows
"storage of rock and stone products" by conditional use permit.
Rezoning the existing city hall site to I-1 is inconsistent with
the best interests of the city and could be attacked as an example
of "spot zoning". Any zoning modification of the city hall site
should bear some relationship to the surrounding zoning
classifications.
Planning Report
October 16, 1989
Page 4
Land in the vicinity of city hall is zoned either single family (R-
1), multi family (R-4) or Central Business commercial (B-l).
Accommodation of the public works storage could occur through
modification of any of these zones or the creation of a new zoning
category. In order to be consistent with the intent of the overall
zoning code, staff feels that the B-1 zone is the potential vehicle
for accommodating the proposed use.
The B-1 zoning district could be modified to allow public buildings
and publicly owned materials storage areas by conditional use
permit. Such a change should also include the establishment of
performance standards for storage areas addressing landscaping and
screening, storm water runoff, setbacks, etc. It is also important
that the purpose accompanying such a zoning change clearly
establish that the use is required to protect public safety and
that no other reasonable alternatives exist either in Mound or in
adjacent communities.
R£COHM£#DATIO#: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find
that if the City Council eventually finds that no other reasonable
alternative to the city hall site exists for public works storage,
the B-1 zoning district should be modified to allow "publicly owned
materials storage areas" as a conditional use. Performance
standards should also be developed to minimize the impact on the
surrounding properties and the natural environment.
Planntng Commission Minutes
October 9, 1989
Page'Four
DISCUSSION/INFORHATIONAL:
Discussion: Open Storag~ of Public Works Materials (Public Hear-
lng is being set for October 23rd~.
The City Planner and Council Representative densen reviewed the
history of this Issue. Koegler further reviewed questions which
the Planning Commission needs to address, they are:
Is open storage of public works materials approprlat~ on
lands lying adjacent to the existing and expanded City Hall?
If not, does the Planntng Commission have suggestions on an
alternative location?
If the Planning Commission finds that storage is appropriate
on the proposed site, what modification to the zoning or-
dinance should be enacted to allow the storage to occur?
The commission discussed possible storage at the east and west
sides of Ctty Hall· The City Engineer informed the Commission of
the amount of storage needed, and the amount of storage space
that can be provided at City Hall. He concluded that even with
storage on both sides of City Hall, storage space will still be
needed for seal coat, salt/sand mixture, and snow. The cost to
create storage space at City Hall compared to the cost to keep
the materials at the Lost Lake site was reviewed. The Commission
determined that their were three impracttcalltles to having
storage sites at City Hal1: 1) cost of the project, 2) having
piles around a "new/improved" City Hall would not be appealing,
and 3> the number of trees that would be cut down.
The Commission discussed the advantages and disadvantages of
having the material stored at the Lost Lake site. The Commission
reached a consensus that the City Hall site Is not an appealing
option, and that the Lost Lake site should be further examined.
A public hearing will be held pertaining *to this Issue at the
next Planntng Commission meeting on October 23, 1989.
City Council Representative Report
Jensen reviewed the City Council Meeting of September 25, 1989
and the Committee of the Whole Meeting.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission and Staff...oj
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: October 2, 1989
SUBJECT: Open Storage of Public Works Materials
The City of Mound has been wrestling with the issue of storage of
public works materials for a number of years. Removal of the piles
of materials from the Lost Lake site has proven to be much easier
said than done. At the present time, the City Council is
considering the establishment of storage areas on either the east
or west sides of the city hall property. Either of these locations
presents a zoning problem which has been referred to the Planning
Commission by the City Council for further review and
consideration.
The attached letter dated September 25, 1989 summarizes the zoning
issues. The basic issue (or problem) is that the R-1 regulations
allow "local government buildings" by conditional use permit but
do not allow open storage areas. Therefore, present zoning
precludes the construction of the materials storage area. At the
last City Council meeting, this issue was referred to the Planning
Commission with the specific request that all findings be forwarded
to the City Council for their review on November 28, 1989.
The issue of open storage of public works materials will be the
subject of a Planning Commission public hearing on October 23,
1989. We would like to use the meeting of October 9, 1989 as an
opportunity to introduce this issue and begin the review process
by the Planning Commission. Ultimately, the Planning Commission
will need to address the following questions:
Is open storage of public works materials appropriate on
lands lying adjacent to the existing and expanded city
hall? If not, does the Planning Commission have
suggestions on an alternative location?
If the Planning Commission finds that storage is
appropriate on the proposed site, what modification to
the zoning ordinance should be enacted to allow the
storage to occur? ~0
3030 Harbor Lane North Bldg.ll, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 55447-2175 612/553-1950
Planning Commission Memorandum
October 2, 1989
Page 2
Question number 2 which deals with zoning needs to be addressed by
the Planning Commission regardless of the Commission's
recommendation on question 1. The Planning Commission will need
to address the zoning issue in case the City Council concludes that
the city hall site is the only site in Mound capable of handling
the proposed storage.
Again, no decision or recommendation is being requested for the
upcoming meeting on October 9, 1989. Monday's meeting will be a
discussion session meant to introduce this complicated topic.
September 25, 1989'
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Ed:
In a recent conversation, you asked me to address the process for
approving an open storage area on the east and west sides of the
city hall building. The city hall site is presently zoned Single
Family Residential (R-l). In that zone, "local government
buildings" is a category in the listing of conditional uses. The
ordinance does not contain a definition of "local government
buildings". Therefore, in order to process a conditional use
permit for the city hall expansion including an outside materials
storage area, the City Council would have to find that the proposed
use is a "local government building".
The only precedent that can even be remotely related to this issue
is the approval in April of 1988 of the new public works building.
In that case, "public buildings" was identified as a permitted use.
Public buildings, a term also not defined, was interpreted in the
case of the public works building to include a small materials
storage area.
If the City Council determines that open materials storage areas
are part of "local government buildings", the city will need to
process the facility as a conditional use permit. Since the permit
will involve a site zoned for residential purposes and the use
(open storage) is normally associated with industrial operations,
the city will need to rigorously apply the standards in the
ordinance pertaining to the criteria for approving conditional use
permits (Section 23.505.1). Major issues in the review are likely
to be concerned with the compatibility of the proposed use with the
surrounding residential properties and environmental issues
associated with the long term storage of salts and other materials
adjacent to Lost Lake.
Very truly yours,
VAN DOREN-HAZARD-STALLINGS, INC.
by:
R. Mark Koegler
City Planner
3030 Harbor Lane North Bldg.ll, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 55447-2175 612/553-1950
(75)
(75)
(6Z)
(74)
EDEN
(
IO
40)
AI
~ (33)
4
(19)
6
(~3)
(1¢4)~'~
I
(23)
D
(
(4)
*.~'74'
L.Zg?. 6
A 63' 5~
(3) ',
(
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
November 20, 1989
Ed Shukle, City Manager
Jan Bertrand, Building Officta
Request to Extend Resolution #88-179
Wes 01sen, 2539 Emerald Drive
I reviewed with Mr. Olsen the subject variance which had been ap-
proved for his property when he filed for homestead. I also
reviewed the status o6 con~letton of the stipulations stated in
Resolution 88-179 with Mr. Bonnickson (applicant and contractor)
at the time of final inspection of the remodeling. Mr. Bonnick-
son evidently failed to inform the owner, Mr. Olsen, prior to the
closing of the property of the remaining variance requirements
for garage removal. Mr. Wes 01sen ls requesting an extension of
the variance granted to Mr. Bonnickson until November 1990 to
either complete the removal of the non-conforming detached
garage, or he will apply for another variance approval to keep
the garage In the existing location.
Technically, as the variance was granted to Mr. Bonnickson he
should be responsible for the stipulated conditions for the ap-
proval of the structural changes which were made to the building.
If the City Council grants the new owner an extension, the new
owner must realize that the responsibility for compliance will
be directed to him and not Mr. Bonnickson.
JB:pj
Enclosures:
Resolution #88-179
Letter from Wes Oisen dated 11-14-89
cc: Wes Olsen
RECEIVED I' 0¥ 1 5 1989
November 14, 1989
Ms. Jan Bertrand
Building Inspector
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Bertrand:
This letter is my official request for an
at 2539 Emerald Drive.
extens'ion
¢
for my garage' ~
The reason for my request is as follows:
l)
My builder did not disclose to me any variance problem
with the garage.
2) I am the new owner of the property and do not have an
alternative garage.
3) There is substantial cost to removing the structure.
I have plans for oae addition, which would involve an attached
garage. However, at this time I have no immediate plans for
construction.
Thank you for your help in clearing up this matter.
Wes Olsen
November 29, 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88-179
RESOLUTION TO RECO~NI~.~- ]tN E/ISTIN~ NONCONPORMINC STRUCTURE
TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS FOR LOT ?, BLOCK 6,
SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT 'B'; P.I.D. NO. 24-117-24-12 0041
(2539 EMERALD DRIVE) P & Z CASE NO. 88-736
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to
recognize existing nonconforming setbacks of 24.2 feet to Emerald
Drive and 21.9 feet to the unimproved 10' alley way for the prin-
cipal building, a 4.3' setback for the accessory building and an
under sized lot of 6,500 square feet +/- to allow structural
repairs to a nonconforming 600 square foot dwelling on Lot 7,
Block 6, Shirley Hills Unit "B"; P.I.D. No. 24-117-24-12 0041;
and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in an R-1
Single Fa.mily Zoning district, which according to the. City Code
requires a 30' front yard abutting the street front, and a 20'
street front setback for the accessory building, and a 10,000
square foot lot size, and a minimum 840 square foot dwelling
floor area, and
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that
alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful noncon-
forming residential unit when the alteration will improve the
livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the num-
ber of units, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
request and does recommend approval with modifications to the ap-
plication.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council, the
City of Mound, as follows:
That the City does hereby authorize the existing non-
conforming principal structure setback to the street
frontage at 2539 Emerald Drive, P.I.D. No. 24-117-24-12
0041 with a 24.2' and a 21.9' setback to the street
fronts for the principal building, a 4.3' setback to
the street front for the accessory building, and a 600
sqUare foot dwelling size.
The City Council authorizes the existing structural
setback and lot area violation and authorizes the addi-
tion setforth below pursuant to Section 23.404, Sub
division (8) with the clear and express understanding
327
November 29, 1988
that the use remains as a lawful nonconforming use sub-
ject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Sec-
tion 23.404.
It is determined that the livability of the residential
unit will be improved by authorizing the following al-
terations to a nonconforming use property to afford the
owner reasonable use of the parcel: to raise the house
approximately 24" above the present basement top of
block, install new roof trusses, and remodel the inte-
rior of the structure to be brought up to the minimum
current building code standards. Upon the conditions
as follows:
ae
No building permit will be issued until the ap-
plicant submits proof of ownership for Lots 7 and
6, Block 6, Shirley Hills Unit "B" to bring the
lot.area to 11,600. ~quare feet +/-, . .
b®
The nonconforming accessory building will be
removed or relocated with conforming setbacks to
the property lines. '
The applicant may continue to add onto the struc-
ture with a future addition upon the condition
that the addition meet all current zoning or-
dinance requirements within one year of this
variance approval.
d. This variance is granted for the following legally
. described property: Lot 6 and 7, Block 6, Shirley
Hills Unit "B"; P.I.D. No. 24-117-24-12 0041.
~This~ariance shall be recorded with the County Re-
. ~r or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County
pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, Section 462.3595,
Subdivision (4).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this
property may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility for
fiiing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying
all costs for such recording. The building structure
shall not be occupied until proof of recording has been
filed with the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Jensen and seconded by Councilmember Abel.
328
November 29, 1988
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Attest: City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 437:15 OF THE
CITY CODE RELATING TO DOCK DESIGN STANDARDS
The City of Mound Does Ordain:
Section 437:15 of the City Code is amended to read as follows:
Section 437:15. Maximum Dimensions, Prohibited Design of Docks. ~
dDocks for which a license is required by this Section 437:15 shall not be
less than 24" wide or more than 48" in width with the exception that one 72" x
72" section is allowed on L, T, or U shaped docks provided that this
configuration be limited t_9o ~setback of 10 feet from private property and
shall not infringe on an adjacent dock site. Docks shall not exceed 24 feet
in length except where necessary to reach a minimum water depth of 36",
using Lake Minnetonka elevation levels of 929.40 feet above sea level.
Channel docks, where navigation i__s limited and docks must be installed
parallel to the shoreline, cannot be less than 24" wide or more than 72' in
width. The length shall be limited to a setback of 10 feet from private
property o__r not ~o infringe on an adjacent dock site. Docks shall be of
plank or rail construction. Doc-~posts shall be of equal height above the
dock boards and shall be at least two rail construction and constructed to
comply to standards and specifications approved by the Dock Inspector.
All docks shall be built or placed with the longitudinal axis thereof
perpendicular to the shoreline unless variations otherwise may be
permitted in accordance with the dock location map. Docks which are in
existence June 1, 1989, shall be brouqht into compliance with all
provisions of the City Code when expansion or modification is requested, or
replacemenCpf 50% or more of any such dock that is damaged, destroyed, or
deteriorated.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
Adopted by City Council
Published in Official Newspaper.
Sql
CIT ()f
.-'~,4! MAYWOOD ROAD
MZUND MINNESOTA
:612,
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
November 21, 1989
City Manager and City Council /
Jim Fackler, Park Dlrecto~~)
1990 Dock Permit Application Forms
Please Find attached a copy of the 1990 Dock Permit Application,
1990 Mooring Buoy Application, and 1990 Annual Dock Site Holding
Application For your review and approval. The Following changes
have been made from the 1989 to the 1990 Forms:
The late fee statement at the beginning oF the Dock Applica-
tion has been revised tn order to give the abutting dock
holder's an incentive to pay their dock application fee on
time· It has been indicated that a "minimum late fee" of
$20·00 will be due if the application fee is not paid before
March 1st. The late fee will Increase at a rate of $10.00
per month after April 1st. The amounts have not been Indi-
cated in order to avoid confusion· An applicant who does
not pay before April 1st Is also required to appear before
the Park Commission in order to use their dock·
The Dock Permit Application Fees have been increased $15 per
dock as per the Five-Year P)an:
Straight Docks
L or T Docks
U or Special Size
1989 Fees
1990 Fees
$120.00 $135.00
170.00 185.00
205.00 220.00
The senior citizen Fees have been adjusted accordingly.
The Park Commission has approved the statement which has
been added to the bottom oF the Dock Application relating to
tires, Fertilizer, etc.
The 1990 Mooring Buoy Application fees have been Increased
by $15.00, per the Five-Year Plan. No other changes have
been made to the Form
The 1990 Annual Dock Site Holdfng Applicatton is a new ap-
pl ication available this year For persons who wish to hold
their dock sites that have been deemed unusable by the Dock
Inspector. qiJ'~&
1990 DOCK PEI~IIT APf~iCATION
CITY OF HOUND, MN
DEAR MOUND RESIDENT=
Please complete and return BEFORE NARCtt I, 1990, (must be postmarked before March
I). Applications received on March I and before April I are subject to a late Fee
of $20.00 and placed in the 3rd priority category. Application renewals for non-
abutting residents not received BEFORE APRIL IST, WILL NOT be issued a permit For
this year. Residents abutting the commons who have not submitted their renewal ap-
plication BEFORE I%ARCN Ist will be subject to a mlnl~Ja late fee of $20.00.
To share a dock, there is an additional $30.00 Fee. Also note the L.M.C.D. Boat
Fee. See Information on back for senior citizen rates. All Information pertain-
lng to you must be completed or the application will be denied.
NAME HOME PHONE
MOUND ADDRESS
WORK PHONE
Check One=
Permanent Resident (owner)
__Owner (paying Fee For renter)
Summer Resident
Renter
MAILING ADDRESS (IF SUMMER RESIDENT)
1989 Permit ~
(Shown on address label on envelope)
Renewal
New Application
You may SHARE a dock with another MOUND RESIDENT ONLY,
I--'[ I am sharing a dock with
(see statement on fee above)
Hound
Address
Home Phone
Work Phone
Check One= __ Permanent Resident (Owner) I Summer Resident __ Renter
List ALL watercraft to be kept at this dock. Furnish MN Watercraft Nu~er, make and
size of boat. (This includes the boats of a shared dock holder.) Add the L.M.C.0.
Boat Fee to the Permit Fee For all boats, based upon the Formula below. NO PER~IIT
WILL BE ISE~JED WITHOUT THIS INFORIt~TION and a photocol~yof all watercraft licenses:
Owner MN Watercraft No. Make Length LMCD Fee
Boat !
Boat 2
Boat 3
Boat 4
Water Sled
)Jet Ski)
L.N.C.D. BOAT FEES=
Boats up to 20 feet long
over 20 to 24 feet long
over 24 to 32 feet long
$10.00 over 32 to 40 feet long $25.00
$15.00 over 40 Feet long $30.00
$20.00
Permits will not be Issued to any non-resident of Mound. Proof of residency or proof
of boat ownership must be Furnished IF requested. Any false Information given or
violations of Dock Ordinance 437 shall be reason For denial or revocation of permit.
This is an application only and no dock can be Installed until a location is
granted.
PAYI~NT OF ALL FEES IJUST ACCOHPANY APPLICATION
DoCK SIZE BASIC
~ Straight Dock (2 Ft. to 4 Ft. wide) $ 135.00
~L or T Dock - any width ~ $ 185.00
[---J U or Special Size (Not available in some areas) $ 220.00
ADO $30.0O FOR
SHARED OOCK
D£$C~ZP?ZON OF P~OPO$£D DOCK
Dock =Ls Dock =T" Dock "U" Dock
(CHECK ONE)
OTHER (HAKE SKETCH)
Fee and legality viii be
determined by Dock Znspeetor
or Park Commission
Please estinate size in feet
on dock of your choice
Senior citizens (65 or older) pay !/2 the base permit fee for the type of clock
tl~ey desire, i.e. $67.50, $92.50 or $110.00.
Senior citizens (65 or older) sharing a dock with a non-senior pay !/4 the base per-
alt fee for the type of dock they desire, i.e. $33.75, $46.25 or $55.00. The non-
senior sharing a clock with a senior pays 3/4 the base permtt fee, I.e. $101.25,
$138.75 or $165.00, plus $30.00 share fee.
SENIOR CITIZEN NAHE & BIRTH DATE
81-3260 $
81-3260 $,
81-3200 $.
81-3260 $
BASIC FEE
ADD FOR SHAREO DOCK
L.M.C.D. BOAT FEES
LATE PENALTIES
TOTAL OIJE
LIABILI1~f DISCLAIMER: I (We) acknowledge that the City of Mound Is not responsible
for any injury occurring on this dock whtch is private property.
DATE Signature
S i gnat u r e
(shared dock holder)
THIS YF~R:
Tires are ,.not allowed on city rental dock sites. All tires must be
removed From city property by ~ !, 1990. The use of fertilizer,
herbicides and pesticides Is not allowed on city property.
RETURN THIS APPLICATION ONLY. KEEP THE OTHER SHEETS FOR YOUR INFORMATION.
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
1990 MOORING BUOY APPLICATION
Dear Mound Resident:
Please complete and return by February 28th. Applications received
after March 1st are subject to a late fee of $20.00 and placed in the
3rd priority category. Renewals not received by April 1st, NO PERMIT
will be issued for this year. All information pertaining to you must
be filled in or permit will be delayed.
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
WORK
[---] Permanent Resident ~ Summer Resident ~ Renter
Mailing address if summer resident
1989 Buoy Permit ~ ~--] Renewal
REOUIRED INFORMATION: List Owner, License ~,
Boat Fee for the boat moored at your buoy. Enclose a copy of your DNR
Watercraft License, no permit will be issued without it.
~ New Application
Type, Length of Boat,
L.M.C.D. BOAT FEE
Up to 20 feet long
Over 20 to 24 feet
Over 24 to 32 feet
Over 32 to 40 feet
Over 40 feet long
$10.00
$15.00
$20.00
$25 .O0
$30 .o0
1990 Permit Fee for a sailboat mooring buoy site will be $135.00, plus
the correct LMCD boat fee for the season. LOCATION OF SITE (describe)
Any false information given or violations of Dock Ordinance #437 shall
be reason for denial or revocation of permit. I understand if I allow
boats not registered to permitholder to be moored at my site, I
violate City of Mound Ordinance #437. This is an application only and
no buoy can be installed until a location is granted.
SIGNATURE
FEE PAID
DATE LATE PENALTY
1990
Annual Dock Site Holding Application
DOCk SITE #.
NANE
ADDRESS
HONE PHONE
~ORK PHONE
CHECK ONE ONLY:
I----1 permanent resident [----1 summer resident
Malltng Address (IF sunnier resident):
----1 renter
IJ [ share this dock with
Address
Phone
$30.00 annual fee enclosed to reserve the above dock site
for me until the water level makes It usable. At that time,
I agree to pay the balance of the fee. Thts $30.00 fee may
be applied towards a shared fee at another usable dock stte.
THIS HOLDING PERHIT IS ONLY GOOD FOR SITES DETERNINED UNUSABLE BY
THE DOCK INSPECTOR.
DOCK INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL:
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
HINUTES OF A HEETING OF THE
HOUND ADVISORY PARK COHHISSION
NOVEHBER 9, 1989
Dock Inspector's Repor~
Fackler reported for Dell Rudolph since he was unable to attend.
Fackler InFormed the Commission that Dell has recommended that
Todd McMaster's dock privileges be revoked. Todd McMaster, who
resides at 5235 Phelps Road, Dock Site #60700, was notified on 7-
19-89, 8-23-89, and 9-1]-89 to remove the debris From his dock
site. On ]0-10-89 Dell ma lied a notice, via certified mall, to
Hr. HcHaster InForming him that the Park Commission will be con-
stderlng hts recommendation not to renew his dock permtt For 1990
and 1991.
NOTION made by Neber, seconded by Casey, to approve the
Dock Inspector's recommendation not to renew Todd
NcMaster's clock permit for the years 1990 and 199l, Dock
Site #60700. Motion carried unanimously.
This recommendation wtll be reviewed by the City Council on
November 28, 1989.
CITY MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
November 15, 1989
Cer~clf~ecl Hall
Mr. Todd McMasters
5235 Phelps Ro~d
Mound, NN 55364
REs Dock Site #60700
Dear Hr. McMasters=
At the regular Park Commission Meettng on November 9, 1989, a
recon~endatlon was made to the Ctty Council to revoke your dock
license for ]990 and 1992 per City Code Section 437:10, Subdivi-
sion 8 and 9. The City Counctl will review this recommendation
at thetr meeting on November 28, ]989, 7:30 p.m., at City Hall.
If you wish to appeal, It must be submitted In writing and mailed
to the City Manager vta certified ma ti, or personally delivered
to the City Manager. The City Manager must receive this appeal
by Thursday, November 22nd. IF you have any questions, please
contact me.
Park Dtrector
JF: pJ
cc:
Ed Schukle, City Manager ~__~_~
Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspector~
JECT:
~41 IM~ ti(wi
MW, Mlnneeote ~
(612) 4T2.11~11
f SiGNfO
· -. ,,-.-..,,--,,~...u..,..,,.,,,, LETTER-LIMINATOR
RECIPIENT: RETAIN WHITE COPY. RETURN PINK COPY
SENDER: SNAP OUT YELLOW COPY ONLY. SEND WHITE AND PINK CC
CARBONINTACT,
~]ease eo.rree~ ~he above In ~he nex~ ~en (10) daTs and
ve~urn to"~ssue your 1989 ~a~,
~hank you ~o? you? cooperation,. ~~~.~
~e~ ~udo~p~
At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, the
following resolution was moved and adopted:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8926 showtng proposed traffic
control stgnal Installation at the Intersection of County State Aid Highway No. 110
and County State Atd Htghway 15 North Junction wtthtn the ltmtts of the Ctty, have
been prepared and presented to the Ctty.
NOW, THEREFORE, [T tS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved and
that the City agrees to provide the enforcement for the prohibition of on-street
parking on those portions or said P'roJec, t No. 8926 within its corporate liatts.
Dated this day of , 1989.
CERTIFZCATZON
State o? Minnesota )
County of Hennepin ) ss.
City or Mound )
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Hound at a meettng thereof
held in the City of Mound, Minnesota, on the day of
, 1989, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession.
(SEAL)
City Clerk
DAT~,
November 20, 1989
City Councils of Hound, Spring Park, Minnetrista
and 0rono
Westonka Pool Boosters
The Need
In December, 1988, the Westonka Community Services (WCS) took over the maintenance
and operating costs of the high school pool from School District ~277 necessitated by
budget cuts. WeS had and continues to provide the lesson programs.
For the past year lesson fees and fundraising efforts have proven to be inadequate
to cover the annual $40,000 cost of operating the pool. Therefore, WCS has exercised
its 30 day cancellation notice for the pool, effectively closing the facility on
ecember 22nd unless funding is generated and/or pledged by that time.
The Programs
The Westonka pool is the setting for swim lessons, physical therapy programs, water
safety instruction and girls' high school and youth swim teams. Over the course of
some years, it provides our lake community with the opportunity for our youth to learn
to swim and a place for safe, healthy recreation.
The Situation
The School Board is being approached during the December llth meeting to reinstate
some portion o~ the pool expenses in their operating budget. Given the size of the
referendum passed and the amount of programs that have been cut, it is expected
that at best only a portion of the total costs will be allotted and that the district
will not take back the responsibility for pool maintenance.
The Precident
The city and the WCS have cofunded/cooperated on projects before, such as Senior
Citizens programs, etc. Since the pool expenses will continue as a WCS program if
funded, we are asking for financial support from all the city councils within the
School District #277 in the same spirit of cofunding.
How Much Is Needed
It is hoped that the four cities within District #277 could 1) pledge same amount
from emergency funds for 1989 costs, and 2) provide a sum total together of $8,000
$12,000 annually from 1990 and forward.
Timing
Due to the 30 day cancellation in effect, WCS seeks a pledge from all sources to
total $40,000 including 1989 costs and 1990 costs by December 15, 1989, to avert the
1 closing.
Nemo to City Councils of Hound, Spring Park, Hinnetrista and Orono
Page 2
The Co~nity
We believe this is a critical time for community and youth activities, both in
the serious need for safe, healthy programs and in the decline of traditional
school budgets to cover costs for facilities and programs.
We have worked with the pool issue for the past year, and realize the community
must take responsibility for programs through new avenues and from many sources
if we are to continue to offer this valuable resource.
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
612) 472-1155
November 21, 1989
TO:
FROM:
RE:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR~'
POSSIBLE CALL OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
I have attached my May 16, 1989 memo regarding the Capital
Improvement Debt Service Fund. The balance in the Capital
Improvement Debt Service Fund is $2,250,000 as of October 31,
1989. The outstanding bonds are $445,000. There are five bond
issues outstanding with a final maturity date of 3-1-93. The
money is not accessible until all bonds are paid off.
One way to get access to the surplus funds is to call the bonds
in at their maturity date. We have five outstanding bond issues:
ISSUE CALL DATE DUE IN 1990
CALLABLE
(future years
beyond 1990)
1972 Improvements
1965 Improvements
1975 Improvements
1976 Improvements
1965 Improvements
1-1-90 5,000 15,000
2-1-90 65,000 65,000
2-1-90 15,000 35,000
2-1-90 15,000 45,000
3-1-90 qS~O00 ~
195,000 255,000
The urgency for the call process is the requirement of a 30 day
notice to call in bonds. Therefore, the Council would have to
approve the calling in of $15,000, 1972 Improvement Bonds at the
November 28th meeting to meet the publication deadline.
In conclusion, there are two choices that remain regarding the
Capital Improvements Debt Service Fund. The first option is to
let the bonds go to their maturities and deal with the surplus in
1993. Secondly, the Council may call the bonds in 1990. This
would allow the Council to direct the use of or set aside the
surplus in 1990.
JN:ls
CITY MOUND
MEMORANDUM
5341 MAYWOOO ROAC
MOUND, MINNESOTA $$364
1612) 472.1155
DATE
TO ~
FROM
Ri[ =
May 16, 1989
Ed 5hukle, City Manager
John L. Norman, Finance Director
Capital Improvement Debt Service Fund
The Capital Improvement Debt Service Fund accounts for al I
assessment proJects and bonds Issued by the City of Mound before
1978. There was a total of eleven bonds issued total lng
$6,649,000 worth of bonos authorized and Issued. The purpose of
the Issues Included sanitary sewer, various street Improvements
and park lmlorovements. Since 1978, all assessment projects anc~
bonds Issued have been accounted for In separate funds. The
Capital Improvement Fund has five bonds outstanding et the end of
1988 total lng $640,000. The cash balance at the end of 1988 Is
$2', 269,000. The main reason for the surplus Is the Interest
earned on Investments clue to the Prepayments of= assessments.
When a property Is sold, generally all assessments outstanding on
that property are palcl off. Mound has had a relatively hlglq
turnover rate of property owners, and therefore, a slgnlflcant
amount of prepayment of special assessments. These prepayments
are Invested to pay off the bonds when they become clue. Many of
the bond~ Issued In the fund have coupons rang lng from 3% - 6%
whrle Interest earned has consistently been higher, Including 13%
- 17~ In the early 1980's. No tax levy money goes Into this
f'und.
The following ts a recap of the Capital Improvements Debt Service
Fund for the past ten years:
Cash Balance Interest on Bonds
Yea~ year-End Investments Outstandln~
1979 $1,975,999 $154,768 $3,085,000
1980 2,022,442 171,873 2,784,000
1981 2,156,623 314,936 2,478,000
1982 2,125,223 236,304 2,172,000
1983 2,091,353 204,001 !,866,000
1984 2,022,411 208,503 1,540,000
1985 2,229,413 200,737 1,248,000
1986 2,262,369 185,776 1,040,000
1987 2,268,289 155,114 840,000
1988 2,268,993 167,334 640,000
Page Two
The cash balance has remained fairly steamy while the outstanding
bonds have been reduced substantially. DeOt Service funds are
restrlcteO as to the use of funds until all the bonos are paid
off.
There are_~ewa~s to get access to the surplus funds. First of all,
as of 2-1-~l~lall of the bono Issues are callable (you are allowed
to pay offthe balance of the issue with your next bono payment).
SeconOly, sufficient funds may be Put in escrow to pay off the
balance of bond payments. In either case, the surplus funds
would be available to use as the City Council directs.
If the funOs would continue on into the future, ali bonds would
be paid off by 1993. A projection of the cash balance and out-
standing bonos Is as follows:
Estimated BonOs
Year Cash Balance Outstanding
1989 $2,240,000 $445,000
1990 2,220,000 250,000
1991 2,190,000 55,000
1992 2,320,000 15,000
1993 2,470,000 0
I have enclosed an article regarding an $18 million surplus In a
special assessment fund for Mtnnetonka. The surplus tn their
special assessment fund also came from Interest earned on PrePay-
ments.
If you have any questions or would like additional details about
the Capital Improvement Oebt Service Fund, please ask.
Minnetonka surplus to be set aside
for projects and possibly programs
8y John~thon White
M~metonka residents hoping to
share d~ectly in tn S18 million surplus
IA the city's Special Assessments
can forget it.
IA a report to the city council at its
Nov. 14 work session, 8 six-member
advisory committee recommended the
fund be renamed the Community
Investment Fund and be used for
"major capital projects or programs of
benefit to the entire communi~."
The $18 million surplus resulted
primarily from pre-payments of spec-
ial assessments for improvements
made years ago in sewer and water
systems.
By investing nearly $75 million in
prep~ments before it was needed to
retire the bonds, the city expects to
raise about $29 million in five years
and have a surplus of $18 million once
bonds are retired.
Returning the surplus directly to
: t&xpayers by a direct cash payment or
cutting the city t~x lev), on en armual
basis until the surplus is gone were
among several options considered by
the committee during months of study.
Both options were rejected. It was
noted that some people who had pre:
paid assessments have since left the
city. It was also feared that the city
would become locked into a lower levy
by state-imposed levy limits once the
surplus had been depleted through tax*
relier.
The committee's recommendations
will be embodied in an ordinance to be
considered by the council early next
year.
The ordinance calls for preference
for funding omong competing pro~ecta
or programs in the following order.
those which can be funded by annual
interest from the fund; those using
pr~ncipol should hive the capacit7 to
repay it; and those which **provide
unattainable commun/ty benefit" and
have no other reasonable fundinf
source.
Some $4 million from the fund has
already been earmarked for building a
new police station and remodel~n.s city
hall.
Estimated interest revenue rrem the
fund is $120,000 in 1989, S360,000 in 1990,
$600,000 in 1991 and $1.12 million each
year there&f%er if the pr~ncipol is not
reduced.
While commending the committee
for its work, some councilmembers
nonetheless expressed misgivings
about funding programs as well as
projects.
"Programs mean so much to differ,.
ant people," s-id Mayor L4rry DonLi~
"People L-e going to come in here
annu&ll¥ for every end en3~,hinS."
At-L4r'se Councllmember Robert
DeGhetto, no~ing that "this is a poli-
Lical hot item," painted a scenM-io of
well-or, sniped pressure groups corn-
lag before the council just .before an
election pressing their case for fi par-
t~cular progra, m.
Ward 4 Councilmember Tim Berl-
stedt was against excluding programs.
He suggested that one way to avoid
pressure groups is Lo require a unan-
imous vote to change the terms of the
fund, rather than the five-of-seven
votes recommended in the committee
RESOLUTION NO. 89-
RESOLUTION DECLARING
DECEMBER 3 - 9 ~ ~tCITIES FIGHT BAOK A~AINST DRU~S WEEK~l
WHEREAS, the presence of drugs and narcotics in our
society has resulted in innumerable problems of human, community,
social and economic dimensions; and
WHEREAS, the consequences of drug-related problems are
witnessed in the loss of human lives, the loss of economic
productivity, the diversion of public resources to address these
problems on all fronts and are threats to the health of our
people; and
WHEREAS, the demand for illegal drugs is a pervasive
problem that affects all segments of our society, including
professional and affluent people; and
WHEREAS, illegal drugs plague urban, suburban, and
rural communities of all sizes and regions; and
WHEREAS, illegal drugs constitute a problem in our com-
munity and lead to a host of problems such as homicides, rob-
beries, burglaries and, oth~.Grimgs,~and domestic violDnce; and
WHEREAS, a national war on drugs has been declared to
combat the importation, trafficking, sale and abuse of drugs; and
WHEREAS, our nation's cities and towns are on the
frontlines of our war on drugs; and
WHEREAS, hundreds of America's dedicated public ser-
vants have died and thousands of others have risked their lives
daily to fight our cities' individual battles against illegal
drugs and the criminal activities stemming from illegal drugs;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF MOUND
declares December 3 - 9 as "Cities Fight Back Against Drugs
Week"; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that during this week the City
will sponsor activities to make people more aware of drug abuse
issues and the local D.A.R.E. program; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the members of the City
will go on record urging community groups, schools, and civic or-
ganizations to support and participate in special activities
during that week to draw community attention to this issue.
MINUTES - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 16, 1989
The meeting was called to order at 7 AM. Members present:
Paul Meisel, Fred Guttormson, Chic Remien, Mayor Smith, Mark
Brewer. Absent: Tim Kenealy. Also present: John Norman,
Finance Director.
Upon motion by Remien, seconded by Guttormson, and carried
unanimously, the minutes of the October 26, 1989 meeting were
approved.
An interview was scheduled for the member vacancy. Ed Shukle had
contacted Carolyn Rosdahl to have her appear at the meeting. She
did not make it to the meeting. Upon motion by Guttormson,
seconded by Remien, and carried unanimously, the Commission
recommended the appointment of Ben Marks to the Economic
Development Commission. The City Council will act on the member
vacancy and recommendation at their November 28th meeting.
BILLS ...... NOVEMBER 28, 1989
BATCH 9111
BATCH 9112
86,984.84
70,236.29
Reo Raj Kennel Fees
Lutz Tree Serv Tree Removals
653.00
1,187.00
TOTAL BILLS
159,061.13
P~E 1
~-C02-01
INUOICE )XiE HDLO
NO. INUOICE )~BR DATE OATE STATUS
B0549 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
CORPORATION
VENDOR TOTAL
C0888 PR~-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
CITY COL~FFY CREI)IT ~ION VE~ TOTAL
00920 PRE-PAID
11/20/8~ 11/20/89
CITY OF NOUNI) VE]~)OR TOTAL
C09Z3 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/"20/89
CITY OF WAYZATA VEl~)(]R TOTAL
C0999 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
CD~ERCIAL LIFE INS CD VENDOR TOTAL
CI001 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
i 1/20/~ 11/20/~
CO~4ISSIONER OF REVENqJE VENDO~ TOTAL
D1219 PRE-PAID
I 1120189
DEl_BERT RU[OLPH VENDOR TOTAL
DI235 PRE-PAID
PURCHASE ,.JOURNAL
CITY OF IIXIND
1,009,18
I,(X)9.18
901.28
901.28
1910.46
2,879.00
2,879.00
2,879.00
2,879.00
5758.00
8.75
45.37
45.37
265,50
265.50
531.00
531.00
49.50
1.80
51.30
51.30
2,158.13
2,158.13
76.19
6,096.87
6,173.06
2,318.35
2,318.35
10649.54
o~.08
82.08
~.08
1,164.15
14.40
37.25
37.25
DESCRIPTION
LIQ
dR~.-CD
LIQ
dR~.-CD
CR UNION 10/29 PR
d~-CD
CR ONION I1/11 PR
JRNL-CD
EMI EXP-P/C
EXPRESS MAIL-P/C
FILM,ETC-P/C
LIC--1974 FORD TRUO(
LIC--1974 FORD TRUCK
JR~-CI)
LIFE INS 11/11 PR
LIFE INS-RETIREE
JR~.-CD
SIT 10/28 PR
JRNL-CD
OCT SALES TAX
OCT SALES TAX
JU~.-CD
SIT 11/11 PR
JRNL-CD
~' CONTRACT HOURS
J~L-CD
DENTAL !0/28 PR
DENTAL--RETIREE
DENTAL--RETIREE
71-7100-9510
I010
71-7100-9510
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
O1-2040-O(XX)
1010
01-4140-4110
01-41a.0-3210
01-4140-2200
I010
73-7200-4140
78-7800-4140
1010
OI-2040-O(XX)
01-4190-1520
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
73-35~-0000
71-3592-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
I010
81-4350-3100
1010
O1-2~)~0-0000
01-4190-1510
01-42~/3-I510
01-4140-1510
TIP[ 9,16.14
PRE-PAID CH.
AMOL~T [~E[]( ! OAIc
1009.18 2998~ 11/0~/89
901.28 3(XX)I 11/16/89
2'879.00 29970 11/02/89
2879.00 30010 11/16/89
45.37 29991 11/13/8~
531.00 30019 11/17/89
51.30 30015 ll/l&/Sq
21~.13 2'9963 11/02/89
6173.06 30000 11/15/89
~3~8.L~., L'~O03 II/16/8~
82.08 2~7 11/14/8~
~111
PAOE Z
}VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE ~JBR D~TE I~TE STATUS
11/20/8~ 11120189
DELTA DENTAL VENDOR TOTAL
E1429 PRE-PAID
II/20/8~ 11/20/~
PRE-PAID
I1120189 11120189
ED PHIII I~ & SONS VE]q[E)R TOTAL
PfUE-PAID
11/20/B9 11/2O189
GEOFF MICHAEl_ VENDOR TOTAL
G1955 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/200/89 11/20/8~
GREAT IdEST LIFE ASSURANCE VENDOR TOTAL
G1971 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 I 1/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/~
GROUP I.EALTH Pr. AN VENDOR TOTAL
G1972 RE-PAID
11/20/89 I1/20/~
PRE-PAID
~145
11120/89 11120189
CO(~ER & COl'IF'ANY VENDOR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
11/20/8g 11/20/~
PRE-PAID
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF
51 .~
1,304.70
1304.70
216.~
45.26
5.13-
256.~
I,I56.44
17.23-
1,422.81
1679.79
561.08
561.0~
561.08
1,463.00
I ,~3.00
1,46.3.00
1,4&3,00
29'26.08
19.10
19.10
235.60
235.60
254.70
343.45
1,615.49
39.18-
29.40
1,949.16
2,183,88
~,6,12
50.80-
17.15
2,506.,35
44.~,51
2~,46
L'x38,46
~IPTIDN
&k~NL -CO
LIQ
WINE
DISC
JPJ~l.-CP
LIQ
WINE
DISC
~NL-CD
FtA~ COI~ DIMMER
JRNL-CI)
DE1r ~ 10/28 PR
,.II~&.-CD
~f ~ 11/II PR
JRM.-CD
HDSP IO/28PR
HOSP 11/11 ~
~NL-CD
LIQ
WINE
DI~
~T
J~NL-CD
LIQ
WINE
DISC
FRT
~NL-CD
SUPP DED 10/28 PR
~-CD
SUPR ~D 11/1 PR
71-7100-1510
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-~u50
I010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-~
1010
01-41~0-4100
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
lOlO
01-2040-0000
1010
71-7100-~10
71-7100-~520
71-7100-7560
71-7100-9600
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-95~
71-71¢~-9B60
71-7100-96(~
1010
01-2(~0-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
TIPE 9.18.14
PRE-PAID ~
AMOUNT Cht~ ! DATE
1304.70 29977 11/02/89
11/07/89
1422.81 ~%'~!X~4 11/14/89
561.0B %XJWJq)7 11/07/89
1463.00 LX)968 II/02/~
1463.00 30(0)0 11/16/89
19.10 2'9974 11/02/~
2~.60 30014 11/16/~
1949.16 ~ 11/07/89
2506.35 2~ I 1/14/8~
2~.46 2q~;65 11/02/89
PAGE
~-C02-0!
INVOI~ ~ HOLD
~. I)~DI~ ~ ~ ~TE STAT~
11120189 11/20/89
~ ~ SUPI:~T & COLLECT, VENDOR TOTAL
I2301 PRE-~ID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
ICMA RETIRE]I~T Th'liST-457 VE]~qOR TOTAL
12304 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
ICMA RETIREI'~ENT I'RU~T-401 ~ TOTAL
J25.,~ PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
,JDO( CLUB ~ TOTAL
,J2571 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/'20/89
JOhn( TAFFE VEND(I~ TOTAL
J'~"/9 PR1E-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
JO-iNSON BROS ~HDLESALE LI* VtENDDR TOTAL
L~17 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/87
LAW ENFOR~MENT LABOR SER, VENDOR TOTAL
L7840 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
LE~ DF MN CITIES VENDOR TOTAL
)%'1090 PRE-PAID
PURCHASE ,JOURNAL
CITY ~ )E)U)~)
AMOUNT OESCRIPTION
288.46 dR~m.-CD
512.90 ICMA 457 10/28 PR
512.90 Ji~U~L-CD
512.90 ICMA 457 11/11 PR
512.90 ~-CD
1025.80
9!.98 ICMA ~01--10/28 PR
71.98 dR~.-CD
91.98 ICMA 401 11/I1 PR
91.98 dR~-CD
183,96
6.OO RETAIL MTG
6.00 RETAIL MTG
I2.00 JRNL-CD
12.00
2~0.50 37 CONTRACT HOURS
240.50 dRi~-CO
240,~)
2,~3.18 LIQ
1,188.63 WINE
62.36- DISC
3,629.45 JRN.-CD
745.51 LIQ
702.76 WINE
21.94- DISC
1,426.33 JRN.-CD
5055.78
44.00 UNION 10/~ PR
44.00 JRNL-CD
44,00
25.00 LMC POLICY MTO
50.00 L~ POLICY MTG
75.00 JRML-CD
$7.3~ HOSP IO/2~PR
87.36 JRNL-CD
ACC(IJNT NUMBER
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-0000
1010
01-2040-~
1010
01-4040-4120
01-41~-4120
1010
01-4340-3100
1010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-~20
71-7100-9560
I010
71-7100-9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010
01-~40-0000
I010
01-4020-41~
01-4040-4120
1010
01-2040-0000
I010
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
21)8.46
512.90
512.90
91.~
91
12.00
240.50
3629.45
1426.33
44.00
75.00
87.36
OATE 11/20/89
TIE 9.18.14
C~'CK! DAlk
300O5 11/16/89
29967 11/02/89
30006 11/16/89
29966 11/02/89
3OOO7 11/16/~
29978 11/07/89
11/14/89
29984 11/07/89
2~_993 11/14/89
~,":~75 1!/02/~
2~...79 11/6.
29973 11/02/8Q
THIS PAGE WAS NOT INTENDED TO BE BLANK,
BUT IT IS.
PAGE 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 11/20/89
AP-C02-OI CITY OF MB,JND TIHE 9.18.14
VENI)OR INVOICE DLIE Il]U)
NO. INVDICE ~ DATE DATE STAllJS
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
· ~) CENTE~ ~ALTH PLAN VENDOR TOTAL
~3170 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
~rTRO WASTE CDNTRDL CD~I* VENIIOR TOTAL
83'268 PRE-PAID
11/20/B9 11/20/89
8N BENEFIT ASSN VENDOR TOTAL
83401 PRE-PAIl)
11/20/~ 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
~ RETIRE)~'NT SYSTE8 VENI)OR TOTAL
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/~
~ TEAHSTERS LDCAL 320 VENDOR TDTAL
83631 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
8UTUAL ~IT LIFE VEN1X)R TDTAL
N3652 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
NCSAWWA VENDOR TOTAL
P2~50 PRE-PAID
11/20/~ 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/B~ 11/20/~
P E R A VENDOR TDTAL
P4010 PRE-PAID
1 i/~/89 11/20/8~
PHILIP HAUGEN VENDOR TOTAL
P4030 PRE-PAID
11/2o/89
AMOUNT DE~IPTION ACCOUNT
1,175.49 HOSP ll/lI PR 01-2040-0000
1,175.49 dRM.-CD I010
1262.85
1,13B.SO OCT SAC 78-2304-00(X)
1,13~.~ ,JRM.-CD 1010
113~.~0
193.7'5 HBA 11/11 PR 01-2040-0000
193.75 JRNL-CD 1010
193.75
288.00 DEF (X]I'{P 10/2'8 PR 01-2040-0000
288.00 dR~.-CD 1010
2~8.00 I)EF ~ 11/11 PR 01-2040-00(X)
21)8.0o JRNL-CI) 1010
576.00
595.65 UNION 10/28 PR 01-2040-0(XX)
595.65 JRNL-CI) 1010
595.65
~2.99 ~ 11/11 PR 01-2040-00(0
~2.~ ,J)U~.-CD 1010
~2.99
50.00 HYI~ANT SCHDOL-SKIN~,C~ENEY 73-7300-4110
~0.00 JRNL-CD 1010
5,949.68 PERA 10/28 PR 01-~340-00O0
5,949,68 JRNL-CD 1010
6,41%60 PERA 11/11 PR 01-2040-0000
6,41%60 JRNL-CD 1010
1 ....... 8
60.00 DDWNTD~ MOWING 01-4340-~00
60.00 J~NL-CI) 1010
60.0O
438.?0 HOSP 10/~ PR 01-2040-0000
438.~0 JRNL-CD 1010
6,563.10 HDSP 11/11 PR 01-2040-0000
PRE-PAID CNE.
AI'IOUNT CHECK !
1175.49 30013 11/16/89
1128.§0 21~B2 11/07/q)9
193.75 30018 11/16/89
288.00 29969 11102/89
288.0O 3(XX)~ 11/16/89
595.65 29976 11/02/89
30017 11/16/B9
· 50.00 2999,9 11/15/89
5949.68 2'r/964 11/02/~
6419.60 30004 11/16/~
6~.00 30O20 11/17/89
~72 11/02/89
NO. INVOICE ~ ~TE I)ATE STAllJS
PHYSICIANS
P4115
11/20/89 11/20/89
~ TOTAL
P~"IE-PA I I)
11/20/89 11/20/89
F~UI)E)~FFIAL I~ANCE CDMPA VENDOR TOTAL
Q4171 PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89,
PiCE-PAID
11/20/89
QUALITY WI~ & SPIRITS VIE)~)I]R TOTAL
PR~E-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89
RI]BE)~T E JO~tS~3N
VENDD~ TOTAL
S43~'7 PR-PAID
11120/89 11120189
VENI)OR TOTAL
PI~E-PAID
11/20/~ 11/20/~
FIUE-PAID
11/20/~ 11/20/E~
STALE ~NK ~ M(3JND
VF. NDDR TOTAL
S4511 PI(E-PAID
11/20/89. 11/20/89
PRE-PAID
11/20/89 II/~/$~
STATE CAPITOL ~EDIT ~I~ VE'N])~ TOTAL
S4/:~39 PR-PAID
11/20/8~ 11/20/89
SLE BARFUETT ~NDO(~ TOTAL
W5.520 F~UE-PAID
11120189 11/20/89
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CI~ ~HOUND
2~.00
&,~.lO
7268.00
~SCRIPTI~
HDSP--RETIREE
SUPPL LIFE 11/11 PR
JR'-CD
?25.04 LIQ
101.70 WINE
19.85- DISC
33.9O MIX
1,040.79 JRNL-CD
1,521.10 LIQ
~2.~5 WINE
~.~- I)ISC
2,~4.~ JRI~.-CD
308.~ ~ CONTRACT HOUR~3
308.48 dR~_-CI)
308.48
340.51 HY~ ~qO<, T[~]L$
~.51
~.51
9,~.~ FIT 10/28 ~
9,8~.~ ~-CD
10,I~.74 11/11
10, I~.74 ~-CO
1~73.~
4~.~ ~ ~I~ I0/~ PR
4~.~ ~-C~
4~.33 ~ ~I~ 11/11
4~.~ ~-CD
~6.66
~ ~T ~T F~-~RRETT
~-CD
15.~ ~ER RETREAT
15,~ ~-CD
01-4140-1510
1010
01-2040-0000
I010
71-7100-~I0
71o7100-9520
71-7100-9560
71-7100-9540
I010
71-7100-~10
71-7100-7520
71-7100-9560
I010
01-4340-3100
1010
~-4170-2200
1010
01-~40-0000
1010
01-2040-(XXX)
1010
01-2040-0000
I010
01-2040-00C'~
!010
01-3820-0(X)0
1010
01-4040-4120
1010
TI~ 9.10.14
PRE-PAID C~ECK
682~.10 30012 11/16/89
2~.00 30016 11/I6/~
1040.79 2?/986 11/07/~
~44.~ 2<79~ 11/14/89
340.51 2991)0 11/07/89
98~.86 ..29962 11/02/8~
I01~,74 30002 11/16/~
4'~8.33 2~71 I1!02/8~
30011 11/16/~?
15.00
29989 11/13/89
PAGE & PURCHASE JOURNAL D~l~ 11/20/89
~-C02-01 CITY OF ~ TI~ 9,18,14
INVOICE IXE Hllfl)
NO. INVOICE bI"IBR DATE DATE STATUS
~ ~CRIPTION
PRE-PAID DiE,
ACCDUNT I~dlIBER AMO~JNT C~CK ! DATE
WESTONKA ~ DF CDR'ER UEI~X)R TOTAL 15.00
Z~ PRE-PAID
11/20/89 11/20/89 ~."SO. O0
ED ANDERSON UENIX)R TOTAL l'50.00
TOTAl. ALL VENDORS 86,984.84
RFND DAR] DEP1]SIT-HOI.q~E NOVE
dRNL-CD
01-3262-0000
1010 250.00
29981 11/03/~
t1~-E02-01
INUOICE DUE HOlD
DATE ))ATE ~TATUS
AiR CO~ DIVISION
iP, B.ER AUTDI~OT IVE
8O521
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENI)ORTOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
MIP~ESOTA CD'ANY VEN[)DR TOTAL
KACKOWIA~ ~ SON
11/21/89 11/21/89
V~ TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
!)Ol, AiqN DISTRIBUTION VENDER TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
CARGILL SALT DIVISION VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
CASH REGISTER SALES VENDOR TOTAL
C0~6
11/21/89 11/21/89
C1EI)AR COMPUTER CENTER VENDO~ TOTAL
CI079
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF HOUND
104.40
10.80
25.20
54.00
ID.BO
lO.BO
50.40
68.40
25.20
360.00
2,478.53
2,478.53
2478.53
35.00
79.00
59.00
173.00
173.00
7,791.49
7,791.49
7791.49
39.45
9.45
3%45
87.0~
87.00
174.00
174.00
321 .~
2.05
4.00
I3ESCRIPTIDN
NOV RADIO SERU CONTRACT
NOV RADIO ~'R¥ CONTRACT
NOV RADIO ~ CONTRACT
NOV RADIO SERV CONTRACT
NOV RADIO SERV CONTRACT
NOV RAI)IO SERV CONTRACT
NOV RADIO SER¥ CONTRACT
NOV RAOIO SERV CONTRACT
NG~ RADIO SERV CONTRACT
dRNL-CD
REPAIR 88 ChlEV M840
dRI~I.-CD
DEC PARKING LEASE
DEC PARXING LEASE
DEC PA~XING LEASE
~ -CD
OCT GARBAGE--STREET
(]CT OARBAOE--~
OCT OARBACE--FIRE
JRNL-CD
MISC NUTS,PAINT
JRNL-CD
SALT
Jl~ -CD
TAPES,ROLLER
JR.-CD
LASER JET TONER CARTRIDGE
LASER JET TONER CARTRIDGE
dI~I.-CD
TELEPHONE
TELEPHOME
TELEPHONE
Ol-428o-~ao
01-4340-3950
Ol-419o-3950
oi-429o-395o
Ol-414o-395o
Ol-4O4o-3<~o
73-7300-3950
78-7800-3~
22-4170-35ro0
1010
01-414~-3810
1010
01-42BO-4200
73-7300-4200
78-7800-42(X)
I010
01-4280-37S0
01-4290-3750
22-4170-3750
1010
01-42~0-2310
I010
01-42BO-~40
I010
71-7100-2200
1010
01-4040-2200
01-414~-2200
1010
01-4320-3220
01-4190-3220
01-40q9-~
~ 11/~I/~
TIT 18.00.54
PRE-PAID (]lEG
~ CHECK ! DATE
PAGE 2
11/21/89 11/21/89..
CONTINE](TAL TELEF14OI~E VEIkH30R TOTAL
Cl130
11/21/89 11/21/89
O. IST~ FIRE APPARATUS VEI~)OR TOTAL
01170
D~OTA RAIL INC
D1290
DISPLAY SALES
E1421
11/21/89 11/21/~
VEN1X~ TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
~ TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
ECONfW~Y SYSTEMS, INC
F1530
FEED RITE CONTROLS
Fl711
~.38
64.77
119.65
32.~0
209.55
141.23
6,5.60
67.70
1,093.31
1093.31
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MOUND
408.~5
204.35
613.00
613.00
31.95
31.95
VENDOR TOTAL 31.95
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
234.~4
2'36.54
234.54
246.95
11/21/89 11/21/89 246.95
FRANCKS TRUCKING VENDOR TOTAL 246.95
DESCRIPTION
TELEPH[NE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
TEL~
TELEl~
TELEPH01~
TELEPHONE
TELE]:q,,ENE
TELEPHONE -COMPUTER
JRI~.-CD
REPAIR LADDER TRLM3K
dRNL-CD
R~ LEASE TO 12/15
I~ LEASE TO 12/15
Jq~.-CD
NA..ql'ERS,SOCXET$ FOR DECORTNS
JRNL-CD
~EADH~T,EAR CLIP
JRNL-CD
FLUORIDE
Jib-CD
OCT FRT
JRNL-CD
01-4040-3220
01-4095-3220
01-4340-3220
01-4280-3220
73-7300-3220
78-7800-3220
01-4140-3220
71-7100-3220
22-4170-3220
22-4170-3220
1010
22-4170-2200
1010
40-6000-3910
01-4320-3910
1010
01-4280-2200
I010
01-4040-2200
1010
73-7300-2260
I010
71-7100-%00
1010
H2120 9.30 HEP,OCT POSTAL VERIF 01-40dJ-3210
11/21/89 11/21/89 9.30 JRI~.-CD 1010
HEBIN CO lYc'PT OF PROPERTY T VENI)OR TOTAL 9.30
J2421 590.00 NOV JANITOR SERV
28.56 NOV JA~qITDR SUPPL
J & S CLEA~ING CO. UENI~R TOTAL 618.56
01-4320-4210
01-4320-2200
1010
TIFIE 18.0~ ~
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT CHECK ! DATE
~-C02-01
INVOICE DUE HOLO
ND. INVOICE ~ DATE DATE STATUS
11/21/B~ 11/21/89
,JANET BERTRAND VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/B9 11/21/89
JOEL KRU~M VEND(]~ TOTAL
K2651
11/21/89 11/21/89
KAR PRODUCTS VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/8~ 11/21/8~
L~,IE COUNTRY CHAPTER ICBO VENDOR TOTAL
L2770
11/21/89 11/21/89
LAKE MTKA CDNSEi~ATION {)Ia VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
LEAGUE DF MN CITIES INS T* VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR VENDOR TOTAL
M30¢0
11/21/89 11/21/89
MASYS CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL
M3080
PUR(~HABE JOURNAL
CITY OF Mi]UNO
14.08
45.44
59.52
59.52
7.15
7.15
7.15
121.61
121.61
121.61
15.00
15.00
15.00
6,205.00
6,205.00
6205.00
679.26
679.26
679,26
98.96
3,911.40
3,994.62
380.11
150.69
1,014.40
3,853.00
1,428.25
2,811.53
2,811.53
22,492.27
22492.27
8.39,
8.39
8.39..
135.00
135.00
135.00
100.00
DESCRIPTION
MTG EXP
ICBO UPDATE C[]NF
dRNL-CD
OCT MILEAOE
dR~-CD
WASHERS, ETC
JR~-CD
[MCD DOCK FEE-PPD
JRNL-CD
4 INSTAL[MT-INS
4 INSTAL[MT-INS
4 INSTAL[MT-INS
4 INSTAL[MT-INS
4 INSTAL[MT-INS
4 INSTAL[MT-INS
4 INSTALLMT- INS
4 INSTALLMT-INS
4 INSTALLMT-INS
4 INSTALLMT-INS
4 INSTALLMT-INS
4 INSTAL[MT-INS
4 INSTALLMT-INS
JRNL-CD
FUSE HOLDER
JR~-CD
DEC ENFORS MAINT
JRNL-CD
OCT ENGR-DEPOT REHAB
OCT ENGR-IIO & 15
OCT ENGR-MSA
01-4190-4120
01-4190-4110
I010
71-7100-2200
1010
01-4290-2310
1010
01-4190-4130
1010
81-1285-0000
1010
01-4040-3610
01-4090-3610
01-4110-3610
01-4140-3610
01-4280-3610
0i-4~0-3610
01-4320-3610
01-4340-363610
22-4170-3610
71-7100-3610
73-7300-3410
78-7800-3610
1010
01-4280-~10
1010
01-4095-3800
1010
01-4320-3100
66-6000-3100
26-5700-3100
TIN lC.GO.S4
PRE-PAID
P~E 4
~P-C02-01
11/21/89 11/21/89
8CCOMBS FRA~< BOOS A~SOCI* VENDOR TOTAL
83170
11/21/89 11/21/89
I~CTRO NASTE Ci]h'l~OL COld, I* VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
MIOLANO EQUIPND~fl' CO VENIX]R TOTAL
8324O
MI~ ~
~250
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENI]~ TOTAL
MINNEGASCO
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENI~ TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89,
~ CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
~ DEPT PUB. IC SAFETY-LIQ* VENDOR TOTAL
LABO TO VENDOR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CIT~ O~
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
2,170.00 OCT EN~-~IG~
30.00 OCT E]~-STRE~S
416.00 DCT EN~-PL~ & II~P
106.00 OCT ENGR-U~J
900.00 OCT ENGR-'90 I~]]6ING
270.00 OCT EN~-LOST LN(E
60.00 OCT ENGR-CATALt'ST ESCRO~
2~.50 OCT EN~-~I'E~ & SIpI{
4,759.00 ~-CD
475%00
~4.50 ~ PYHT
544.50 J~M.-CD
5~.50
I, 197.50 I3L{~ BOX
1,197.50 ~ BOX
2,3~5.00
2395.00
45.8O NOV PA~ RENT
45.80 JRN.-CD
45.80
42.03 OCT GAS
77.24 OCT GAS
146.87 OCT GAS
172.79 OCT GAS
112.31 OCT GAS
151.72 OCT GAS
35,15 OCT GAS
738.11 JRffi.-CO
738.11
· 302.95 ASTRA PA~I',FACEPC E~ELL
302.95 ,JqNL-CD
302.95
12.00 BUYER CARD FEE
12.00 JRI~.-CD
12.00
44.00 WATER ANALYSIS
44.00 JRNL-CD
44.00
2.69 OCT It[ME
26-5700-3100
01-4280-3100
01-4190-3100
01-4190-3100
81-4350-3100
60-6000-3100
01-2300-0905
73-7300-3100
78-7800-3100
1010
78-2304-0(XK)
1010
~-7300-5000
~-7800-5000
1010
01-4140-3950
I010
01-4340-3720
01-43~20-3720
01-42N~0-3720
73-7300-3720
78-7800-3720
22-4170-3720
71-7100-3720
I010
22-4170-2~0
I010
71-7100-4140
1010
73-7300-3100
1010
01-4320-2200
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
DATE 11/21/89
TI~ 18.00.~
AP-C02-O1
NO. INVDICE )~4BR DATE DATE STATUS
NAVARffiE HARDWARE
N3740
}k=14MAN SIGNS
N3802
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAl.
11/21/8'9 11/21/89
VE}(30~ TOTAL
11/21/~ 11/21/~
NOR~ STATES ~ VENDOR TOTAL
11~1/89 11/21/89
PA{,{. BROW~i PONTIAC-G~K2 ~ TOTAL
P4031
PHYSICIANS OF ~
P4090
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENJ3(W~, TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
FU2N, ER ~AK]E EQUIPTENI' CD VEND(O TOTAL
R41~
11/21/89 11/21/89
R.C. ELECTRIC, INC. VENIK]R TOTAL
54390
Si-{]RELINE R. AZA
S4419
SNA~-~ TOQ. S
545~)
11/21/89 II/21/~
~ TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENI)OR TOTAL
PURCHASE ,JOURNAl.
CITY OF IIK)UND
42.12
17.17
37.77
22,00
190.81
190.81
54.59
10.50
~.~
4,308.50
4,388.58
37.80
37.80
37.80
205.45
12~.00
12%00
443.45
463.45
93.14
~.15
186.~
186.2~
825.00
2,300.66
2,300.64,
45.25
45.25.,
45,25
DESCRIPTIDN
~T ~
OCT ~
DCT HDME
OCT
OCT HDME
~T HDWE
LETTERS
LET~
d~]qL-CD
NOV ELEL~II{ICITY
~ PONTI~-IGNTN LU~
dP, M,-CD
DEC HOSP-M THARALSON
1-2-3 HOSP-R THARALSON
1-2-3 HOSP-WERTS
JRNL-CD
EXH~T SYST-N16
EXHAUST SYST-#16
JRM.-CD
~PAIR LIGHT FH3{_E
~-CD
DEC TNT
JRNL-CD
S~30<ET
JRNL-CD
01-4340-2200
01-4280-22(X)
01-42'80-2240
01-4280-23(X)
78-78KX)-23(K)
73-730O-2240
1010
01-4280-23~
01-4270-2200
1010
01-4280-3710
1010
01-4140-3810
I010
01-4140-1510
01-4140-1510
71-7100-1510
1010
73-7300-2300
78-7800-~00
1010
01-1190-0000
1010
71-71~-~20
1010
01-42~0-2250
i010
~E-PAID
AMOUNT
lI~ 18.00.~
217.~ ~ WIRE, INSP FEE 78-78~-42~
11/21/~ ll/21/~ 217.~ ~-CD I010
AP-C02-Ol
VE)BOR INVOICE OUE HOLO
NO. INUDICE ~ BAlE BAlE STATU~
ELECTRIC CO
OUI)URBN( TI~ ~
VE]qDOR TOT~
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
9UPE~ICA
94643
~ LOCK
T47~
11/21/$9 11/21/89
VEHI)OR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
THE LAKER
T4790
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
ll~ BROS C~EV~T VENI~ TOTAL
T4890
TOOLS UNLIMITED
~,050
ONIFDRMS UNLIMITED
W~430
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/8'9 I1/21/~
VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/8~ 11/21/89
WATER PRODUCTS CDMPANY VENDOR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF NOtWD.
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
217.25
70.08 TIRES
208,36 TIRES
278.44 JRNL-CD
278.~
22.20 OCT GA~]LI~E
35.39 OCT C~qSOLI~
25.83 OCT GASOLI~
397.26 OCT GA,q(X. INE
740.42 OCT GASOLINE
I~.09 OCT GWqSOLINE
151.10 OCT GASOLI~
254.17 OCT C~qSOLINE
2.59 BATIERIES
21.11 FILM
843.73 OCT GASOLINE
2,692.89 JRNL-CD
2692.89
231.00 INSTALL LOCKS
231.00 JR~,-CD
231.00
81.~ OCT LEGAL ADS-LAkCER
32.40 OCT LEr_.~L ADS-LAKER-STORAGE
45.00 LABELS--h~q~ETTER
158.80 JR~.-CD
158.80
17.39 SWITCH
17.39 JRNL-CD
17.39
126.60 PLASTIC TIES
126.60 JRit-CD
126.60
24.~ HAT-NICCUM
24?5 JRNL-CD
24.¢5
301.48 REPAIR LIDS
301.48 JRNL-CD
301.48
73-7300-3880
01-4140-3810
1010
01-4040-2210
01-4190-2210
01-4290-2210
01-4340-2210
01-4280-2210
22-4170-22i0
78-7B00-2210
73-7300-2210
73-7300-2200
01-4140-2200
01-4140-2210
1010
01-4290-2330
1010
01-4020-~10
60-6000-3510
01-4020-2200
I010
01-4~0-2310
1010
01-4280-2200
I010
01-4140-2240
I010
73-7300-.%300
I010
TI~ 18.00.54
PRE-PAID C~E~
AM(X~4T CHECK I BATE
~ ?
~-~)2-01
WATZATA AUTO SERVICE
W5630
DATE DATE STATUS
11/21/89 11/21/~
VEN[}(]R TOT~
WIDMER INC
WS.~O
#ILLI~ M ~
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
~TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
VIE)~]OR TOTAL
XERgX CORPORATION
Z~70
ZIEGLER INC
Z6147
DEBBIE
11/21/89 11/21/89
~ TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDOR TOTAL
11/21/89 11/21/89
VENDO~ TOTAL
TOTAL ALL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF MOL)~
270.00
170.00
2,176.~
2,847.~
2847.~
2,O74.00
2,074.00
~.26
13.67
13.67
13.67
142.12
142.12
142.12
~PRING TRIPS
3 PTS ~
MAIN i)SEAK
MAIN ~
I~TALL SWR ~RV-HIOI-)_A/iD
OR~I.-CD
~S RE IMB-I'EIDSON
dRI~.-CD
DCT PR1]SECUTION
XEROX STAPLES
JRNL-CD
~ LATCH
REFND mR PYMT
JRNL -CD
70,236.~
01-4280-2310
1010
73-7300-38(X)
73-7300-3800
73-7300-3800
78-7800-~00
1010
01-4140-31~0
1010
01-4110-3120
1010
01-4320-2200
1010
01-42q~)-~10
1010
79-1191-0000
1010
PRE-PAID
TI~ lO.O0.S4
DATE
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Business Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Charges to Other
Departments
Other Revenue
TOTAL REVENUE
LIQUOR FUND
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
DOCKS FUND
CEMETERY FUND
BUDGET
984315
965800
9410
86700
38800
100000
16500
51850
2253375
880000
330000
580000
65300
3050
CITY OF MOUND
1989 BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
OCTOBER 1989
OCTOBER YTD
REVENUE
83.3%
PER CENT
REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED
0 495866 488449 50.38%
3822 540947 424853 56.01%
0 8054 1356 85.59%
8043 67062 19638 77.35%
772 10670 28130 27.50%
9957 70262 29738 70.26%
2044 17653 -1153 106.99%
442 2098 49752 4.05%
25080 1212612 1040763 53.81%
72341 725435 154565 82.44%
32364 268573 61427 81.39%
47772 474981 105019 81.89%
0 61781 3519 94.61%
0 1400 1650 45.90%
CITY OF MOUND
1989 BUDGET REPORT
EXPENDITURES
OCTOBER 1989
83.3%
BUDGET
GENERAL FUND
Council
Cable TV
City Manager/Clerk
Elections
Assessing
Finance
Computer
Legal
Police
Civil Defense
Planning/Inspections
Recycling
Streets
Shop & Stores
City Property
Parks
Summer Recreation
Contingencies
Transfers
46030
9980
143210
650
43930
152760
20000
97100
677770
1880
128400
67400
391140
57760
81860
149320
11090
30000
126150
OCTOBER YTD
EXPENSE EXPENSE
PER CENT
VARIANCE EXPENDED
1039 61814 -15784 134.29%
0 8717 1263 87.34%
10223 113755 29455 79.43%
56 328 322 50.46%
132 41925 2005 95.44%
11548 122680 30080 80.31%
3221 21537 -1537 107.69%
6162 52678 44422 54.25%
54636 546199 131571 80.59%
600 826 1054 43.94%
9959 94092 34308 73.28%
10804 68840 -1440 102.14%
29864 378338 12802 96.73%
6056 54396 3364 94.18%
25241 97432 -15572 119.02%
24820 133657 15663 89.51%
6056 8917 2173 80.41%
6181 16427 13573 54.76%
9858 98686 27464 78.23%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
Area Fire
Service Fund
Liquor Fund
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Docks Fund
Cemetery Fund
2236430 216456 1921244
315186 85.91%
209230 13742 151994 57236 72.64%
158810 11299 129413 29397 81.49%
322550 26007 309085 13465 95.83%
634160 58216 530301 103859 83.62%
72240 2280 62174 10066 86.07%
3950 361 2202 1748 55.75%
WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
INDEPF_.NDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 277 0340
5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD · MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 · PHONE: 472-.16~
NOV i 6 lgB
November 14, 1989
Eugene Hoff
Street Superintendent
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Hoff:
This is a note of appreciation to your department for the Farmers'
Market signs in the Municipal Parking lot.
The sign by County Road 15 notified people of the location of the
Farmers' Market.
The other sign in the parking lot reserved spaces for the growers
on Wednetdays. Now they can be grouped together and are not
scattered all over the lot in chance vacant parking spaces. Both
signs show your support and are indications to others of a
community that is organized and supportive of its various activities.
Thank you!
Sincerely,
Cathy Stepanek
Mana r ound Farmers' Market
Director o~ Westonka Community Services
CS,DU/ls
cc: Ed Shukle, City Manager
~nd City Council
H ! NUTES OF A MEET! NG OF THE
MOUND ADV I SORY PARt( C~3MN i SS i ~
NOVEMBER 9, 19~39
Present were: Chair Marilyn Byrnes, Commissioners Nell Weber,
Tom Casey, Steve Burke, Shirley Andersen, Nancy Clough and Brian
Asleson; Counctl Representative Phyllis Jessen; Park Director Jim
Fackler; City Manager, Ed Shukle, Dock Inspector, Dell Rudolph,
and Secretary Peggy James. Absent and excused was: Commissioner
Cathy Bally.
The Following citizens were also in attendance= Janet Johnson,
Brian Johnson, Mark 5chlei, Jtm Ostman, Kay Ostman, Bryan Clem,
Paul Glynn, Donna EasthOuse, Gayla Grady, Skip Johnson, Harvey
Reder, Carolyn 5chmldt, Cliff $chmidt, Ron Johnson, Jim Grady,
Doug Easthouse, Gert Gerold, Don Henry, Claudta Henry, Ken
HasselFeldt.
Chair Byrnes called the meettng to order at 7=30 p.m.
Minutes
The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of October I2, 1989
were presented For changes and/or additions.
MOTION made by dessen, seconded by Asleson to approve
the Park Commission Minutes of' October 12, 1989 as writ-
ten. Motion carried unanimously.
1990 Dock Location Ma~
The Park Director, Jtm Fackler, reported that there are no
changes being proposed From the 1989 map. He surmised that there
are 443 dock sites ltsted on the map, however only 360 of these
sites will be usable tn 1990 due to the Iow water level. Fackler
also reviewed the number of docks located on Ctty parks.
Chair Byrnes asked the citizens present tf anyone wished to speak
on the Issue. Gert Gerold of 4600 Manchester Road questioned IF
docks could be Installed on the property by the Black Lake
brtdge. Fackler explained that thts property is either County or
privately owned.
Ron Johnson of 4416 Dorchester Road questioned why there was ever
a problem with the docks being located at Avalon Park. Chair
Byrnes explained the htstory of the Avalon dock Issue. Council-
member Skip Johnson asked to speak on the Issue of Avalon Park.
Skip explained that he raised the Issue at a council meeting
since he was aware at one ttme that the park was owned by an as-
sociation and they did not want docks at the park. Johnson ex-
plained that when the area was used as a swimming beach it had a
nice sand bottom, however, lack of use and dredging From Goose
Park Commission Hinutes
November 9, 1989
Page Two
Island has destroyed the sand bottom which is now covered with a
soot type material. He stated that the docks dominate the park
and have changed the usage of the park. Johnson added that after
the docks were Installed at Avalon, 100 people signed a petltton
to remove the docks and itmlt the use of the park. Bryan Clem of
4464 Hanchester confirmed that there was a petition dated Hay 4,
1982 and it did have 100 signatures on lt.
Gert Gerold stated that she uses Avalon park, however does not
have a dock or a boat. 5he has a day care with twelve children
and would like to see a bench or picnic table and some playground
equipment at the park. She stated that the kids walk on the
docks because their Is nothing else to do at the park. 5he added
that the docks are not a problems, however, the park needs equip-
ment.
Fackler informed the Commission that there Is a very iow turnover
rate for the dock holders at Avalon, there Is a limited amount of
dock space available for non-abutting property owners on the is-
land.
Ron Johnson added that it would be nice to have a picnic table or
bench at the park. Fackler stated that there was a picnic table
at the Park this last summer. Johnson also questioned If the
well could be made usable again, he belteves the casing is still
there.
Cliff Schmtdt of 3001 Island View Drive stated that the docks are
dangerous for the kids. Jim Ostman of 2945 Island View Drive
stated that the older kids fish from the docks.
Chair Byrnes read a letter written by Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspec-
tor, recommending that the docks remain at Avalon Park.
Donna Easthouse of 304Z Island View Drlve stated that she helped
walk the petition In 1982 and would prefer to see Avalon Park
used for a swimming beach.
Weber questioned Fackler on the possibility of relocating the
dock holders at Avalon. Fackler stated that it would be almost
impossible, especially due to the Iow water, and since the dock
holders are non-abutting residents, a relocation would mean that
their docks could be across town. He added that there is a htgh
demand from non-abutting property owners for dock sites.
HOTION made by Asleson, seconded by Burke to approve the
Dock Inspector's recommendation for approval of the 1990
Dock Location Hap as submitted. Hotlon carried unanim-
ously.
Park Cc~m~lsston Minutes
November 9, !989
Page Three
Asleson added that tt was bad timing to request the removal of
these City docks when the water is so Iow and docks are high in
demand. In addition, the LMCD may freeze the number of dock
sites for the City of Mound at our current number of docks,
therefore, it is not favorable to eliminate any dock sites at
this time.
This issue will be reviewed by the City Council on November 14,
1989.
Policy on Appointments and/or Reappointments to the Park Commis-
sion and Amendment to Section 255:05.
'~The City Manager explained the reason for adopting this po]icy
and the advantages of adopting It. He also informed the Commis-
sion of the City Council's decision to remove the provision from
City Code Section Z55:05 which limited the number of terms a mem-
ber is allowed to serve on the Park Commission.
Budget Up-date.
The City Manager explained that the City Council has scheduled
budget hearings for November 28th and December 5th.
City Manager's Report
The City Manager informed the Park Commission that the Planning
Commission has recommended not to have the public works outdoor
storage materials site located at City Hal1.
The Manager also reviewed a recommendation from Steve Jantzen
regarding potential remodeling at the Mound Bay Park Depot. He
added that Jantzen estimated the remodeling project to cost
$50,000 which would allow the building to be serviceable for 5 to
10 years. The City Manager suggested contacting local organiza-
tions such as the Lions and Rotary Club for contributions to the
project. Burke suggested that this may be a good project for a
votech class. It was determined that this issue would be dis-
cussed at the December 14th meeting, and the historical society
should be contacted so they may participate in the discussion.
Park Director's Report
Fackler reported that the improvements to Pembroke Park are al-
most complete and all the signs for the parks have been con-
structed, however will not be installed until Spring of ]990.
Park Commission Mtnutes
November 9, 1989
Page Three
Dock Inspector's Report
Fackler reported For Dell Rudolph since he was unable to attend.
Fackler Informed the Commission that 0eli has recommended that
Todd McMaster's dock privileges be revoked. Todd McMaster, who
resides at 5235 Phelps Road, Dock Site #60?00, was notified on ?-
19-89, 8-23-89, and 9-11-89 to remove the debris from his dock
site. On 10-10-89 Deli mailed a notice, via certified mail, to
Mr. McMaster Informing him that the Park Commission will be con-
sidering his recommendation not to renew his dock permit For 1990
and 1991.
MOTION made by Weber, seconded by Casey, to approve the
Dock Inspector's recommendation not to renew Todd
McMaster's dock permit for the years 1990 and 1991, Dock
Site #60700, Motion carried unanimously.
This recommendation wili be reviewed by the City Council on
November 28, 1989.
General Dtscussfon - Mound Depot.
Casey suggested a revision to the Depot Rental Fee Schedule. In
relation to the "free" classification. He questioned how the
City determines who Is "commonly known?"
MOTION made by Casey to amend the Depot Rental Fee
Schedule under the "Free" classification to read as
Follows:
"To eommon~Y-~-~t~-and non-profit charitable or-
ganizations providing clean-up Is made after the meet-
ing, such as, but not limited to the Following:
Jaycees, K.C.'s, Lions, Rotary, Free B's, Women's 5ewtng
Guild, Garden Clubs, Women's Clubs, Westonka Chamber of
Commerce, Historical Society, and any other non-profit
organization.
Due to lack of a second, Casey withdrew hfs motion.
it was determined that tf the Issue of the Depot Fee Schedule Is
raised again, the Park Commission should be advised.
General Discussion - Park & "Open Space" Commission.
Casey commented on City Council discussions relating to the pos-
slbllity of increasing the capacity of the Park Commission to In-
clude "open space," therefore call us a Park and Open Space Com-
mission. Casey referred to the Co~3rehenstve Plan within the
Recreation Section which states "recommendations For the City to
acquire natural areas and open space and For the City to explore
seasonal use of wetlands."
Park Commission Hinutes
November g, t98~
Page Five
MOTION made by Casey to recomend to the City Council
that the Park Commission's advisory capacity include not
Just parks, but wetlands and open space, and that the
Park Commission be called a "Park and Open Space Commis-
sion.''
The motion failed due to lack of a second.
Casey Further referred to the Comprehensive Plan on pages R-33
and R-34 which refers to the utilization of open spaces and wet-
lands. The Commission discussed the pros and cons of changing
the name of the con~nisston.
MOTION made by Casey, seconded by Burke, to add the
Issue of possibly increasing the capacity of the Park
Commission to be a "Park and Open Space Commission" to
the December 14th agenda. Motion carried 6 - 1. Those
in favor: Burke, Asleson, Andersen, Bailey, Casey, and
Weber. Those opposed: dessen.
Jessen stated that she feels the timing is bad and that this is
not something that should be pushed through.
Herbicides and Pesticides.
Casey referred to the City Council motion made at their meeting
on September 26, 1989 relating to the spraying of herbicides on
City property. He questioned the Interpretation of "carefully
monitored."
Casey suggested that the use of herbicides and pesticides not be
allowed on City Property except by permit From City Council or
staff. In addition he suggested this be added to the Dock Ap-
plication. It was determined that the City Council was referring
only to the City's use of herbicides, not private use.
The Commission determined that the the statement referring to
Fertilizer on the Dock Application Form be expanded to tnclude
herbicides and pesticides.
MOTION made by Casey, seconded by Asleson to expand the
statement at the bottom of the Bock Permit Application
to read: "The use of fertilizer, herbicides and pes-
ticides is not allowed on City property. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION made by Casey seconded by Andersen to adjourn the
meeting at 9:55 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
HOUND ADV I SORY PLANN I NG COHM ! SS ! ON
November 13, ! 989
Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners GeoFf
Michael, Ken Smith, Frank Wetland, Wtlltam Thai, and Jerry Clap-
saddle, Council Representative Ltz Jensen, Butlding Offictai Jan
Bertrand, City Manager Ed Shukle, and Secretary Peggy James. Ab-
sent and excused were: Commissioners Ken Smith and Frank
Wetland.
INTERVIEWS FOR VACANCIES ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Those present for the Interviews were: Mayor Steve Smith,
Counctlmember: Liz Jansen, Skip Johnson, and Andrea Ahrens, Plan-
ning Commissioners: Chair Bil i Meyer, Geo~F Michael, Jerry Clap-
saddle, and Bill Thai.
a. Michael Muellert 5910 Ridgewood Road
Mr. Mueller stated that he ts willing to Invest his time to at-
tend commission meetings, and since he Is self-employed can ar-
range his schedule accordingly. He is concerned with the en-
vironment of Mound relating to waste management and wildlife
preservation. He Feels the Ctty needs to promote thetr Ideas and
issues through public awareness. He believes the image of Mound
is improving and that the lake Is a good asset to the City stnce
5l~ of the houses on Lake Minnetonka are In the Westonka School
District.
The Commissioners questioned Mr. Mueller on potential conflict of
Interest. Mr. Mueller stated that he would abstain from any vote
that directly related to any case which he is Involved in. He
stated that he has good ethics and believes in being fair.
Mr. Mueiler supports truth in housing, and explained that he ts
tnvolved with the Minneapolis Board of Realtors and is Chairman
on the Truth in Housing Code Sub-committee. Me belteves in
growth for the City, however, ts aware that we are a bedroom com-
munity.
Mr. Mueller's understanding of being an "advisory board to the
City Council" is to explore subJect Issues and make recommenda-
tions. Mueller determined a "hardship" should be evaluated by
how a change may affect the neighborhood.
b. Terry Selle, 2675 Westedge Blvd.
Mr. Selle stated that he is Secretary of Westonka Lions Club and
is very committed member, he added that he would also be Just as
committed to the Planning Commission. He is a 13 year resident
of Mound and would like to get Involved with the City. He would
like the City to grow so It can prc~uce a higher tax revenue,
such as creating more industry. He believes the Image of Mound
has Improved, however housing In Mound could be up-graded.
Planning Commission Minutes
~vember 13, IgSg
Page Two
Mr. Selle's understanding of what "advisory board to the City
Council" means is to give the Planning Co~nission's decisions to
the City Council, and they will rule. His determination of a
hardship would depend on how the change would Impact the neigh-
borhood.
c. Bill Voss, 4619 Kildare Road
Mr. Voss explained that he has Flexible hours with work, there-
Fore, meeting attendance Is no problem. He has served on several
boards and volunteered For many organizations such as the Depart-
ment of Corrections Advisory Board For Hennepln County, the
Wayzata Chapter of Demo lay Parents Club, Civil Human Rights Com-
mission, Wayzata Masons and others involving his line of work as
a law enforcement officer. He believes citizen participation is
crucial to good government.
Mr. Voss Is In Favor of housing maintenance, and Feels the City
needs to clean up rental and abandoned property. The Image of
Mound has Improved.
Mr. Voss's understanding of what "advisory board to the City
Council" means is that final decisions are made by the City Coun-
cil. His determination of a "hardship" would be that the change
will Fit into the scheme of the area, it should not destroy a
neighbors view or their rights.
Chair Bill Meyer called the regular meeting to order at 7:45 p.m.
The Following citizens were present: Ltnda Drews, Michael Mar-
tlnson, Linde Martinson, Bruce McComb, Marcy Lemmon, Jack Ostvtg,
Gunnel Ostvig, Harold Paterson, Leone Paterson, Stephen Schmidt,
Suzanne Schmtdt, William Voss, Michael Mueller, and Skip Johnson.
MINUTES:
NOTION made by Michael seconded by Thai to approve the
Planning Commission Minutes of October 23, 1989 as ~rit-
ten. Notion carried unanimously.
BOARD OF APPEALS:
a.
Bruce McCc~t Request to Move a house From 3005 Brighton
Blvd. to 4723 Cumberland Road. PUBLIC HEARING.
Commissioner Thai requested to be removed From the Commission For
discussion on this case as he will abstain From voting. It was
determined that the Commission still had a quorum with 4 of 7
Commissioners present.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 13, 1989
Page Three
Butlding Official, Jan Bertrand, questioned the necessity to
review the report as it ts lengthy and since it was extensively
reviewed at the October 9th Planning Commission Meeting. Chair
Meyer asked if any persons present wished to have the Inspector's
Report reviewed, since there was no reply from citizens present,
the report was not reviewed.
Applicant, Bruce McComb, displayed a front and side elevation
drawing of the proposed Improved structure as it would be on the
new lot. He also displayed photographs of ail the extsting house
on Cumberland. He briefly reviewed the improvements that are to
be made to the home.
Chair Meyer opened the public hearing.
Steve Schmtdt of 2986 Highland Blvd., who owns the property ad-
Jacent to the subject address, questioned the Finished value of
the proposed house and the square Footage compared to the other
homes In the neighborhood. Mr. McComb stated that the Finished
square footage of the home will be 995 square feet, and the
proposed finished value, per two realtors, is $75,900. Steve
Schmtdt stated that he does not believe he will even get $70,000
For the home. The Building Official reviewed the values and
square footage of the other homes on Cumberland. it was deter-
mined that the home was con~aarable In size and value to the other
exlsttng homes.
Since no other citizens wished to speak on the Issue, Chair Meyer
closed the public hearing.
MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Clapsaddle to recom-
mend approval of the house moving request as so moved In
the motion of October 9, 1989 as follows= Recomnend ap-
proval of the house moving from 3005 Brighton Blvd. to
4723 Cun~erland Road per staff recommendation, excludlng
the recommendation to re-configure the warm air ducts to
the ~tslde ~alls and the return air ducts to the Inside
walls. In addition, a bond at ]Z5% of the proposed
flntshed value of the house must be obtained In favor of
the City of Hound to ensure con~31etion of the project.
The house is to be moved and con~31eted to code by 12-31-
90. The house is to be constructed with a tuckunder
garage as per the plans submitted by the applicant
(Exhibits A & B). Motion carried 3 to I. Those In
favor= Clapsaddle, Meyer, and Hlchael. Those opposed=
Jansen.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 13, 1989
Page Four
densen stated her reason For opposing is that she does not agree
with the omission of the Building Officials recommendation to re-
configure the supply and return air ducts since our City Code
requires that when a structure ts moved or relocated it must con-
form to the requirements for a new structure.
This case will be heard by the City Council on November 28, 1989.
Michael Martfnson, 5918 Lynwood Blvd., Part of Lots 9 & 10,
Koehler's 2nd Addition, PID #14-117-24-42 0018. SETBACK
VARIANCE.
Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicants request
for a 25 foot variance to allow placement of a 8' x 16' storage
shed. She explained that tf the roof area of a structure does
not exceed 120 square feet a building permit is not required,
however it must conform to the setback requirements. The shed is
required to be setback 30 feet from Langdon Lane, it presently
sits five feet from the Langdon Lane right-of-way.
Staff recommended approval of the 25 foot setback variance due to
topography, forestation, drainage, and relocation of the public
right-of-way upon the condition that if any structural changes to
the building are made In the future, another variance must be ap-
proved.
Applicant, Michael Martfnson, explained to the Commission that
there is no other location on his lot for the shed to be erected
due to trees, a future location for a garage, drainage, and
topography. Harold Peterson of 5939 Gumwood Road spoke tn op-
position of having the shed in the proposed location, he feels It
is too close to the street.
The Commissioners reviewed the site plan and determined that
their is sufficient open space on the subject lot within the
required setbacks. They also discussed the Intensity of the
requested variance.
MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Clapsaddle, to deny
the requested 25 foot setback variance for 5918 Lynwood
Blvd. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council at their meeting on
November 28, 1989.
DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONALt
b. City Council Representative Report.
Jensen reviewed the City Council meeting of October 24, 1989.
Planning Commission Minutes
November 13, 1989
Page Five
c. Amendment to House Moving Ordinance.
The Commissioners discussed the need For the house moving or-
dinance to be amended to require publtc hearings. Bertrand sug-
gested that the public hearing requirements be the same as those
used when processing a Conditional Use Permit, Section 23.505.3.
In addition, it was determined that an application Fee should be
established. It was suggested that the Fee be the same as that
For a Conditional Use, which Is $200.
I~OTION made by Thai, seconded by Meyer to recommend to
the City Council that City Code Section 300=25 relating
to Moving of Buildings, Subd. 3. be amended to require a
public hearing using the same requirements In City Code
Section 23.505.3. In addition, a zoning application Fee
of $200 shall be required for any house moving request.
Hotlon carried unanimously.
Results of Interviews For Vacancies on the Planning Commission.
The Commissioners briefly discussed the applicants. It was
determined that the Commissioners would vote via secret ballot
giving the most Favorable applicant a 3, the next Favorable a 2,
and the next a 1. It was a unanimous decision that Michael Muel-
let was the most Favorable applicant, and Wtlltam Voss was the
next Favorable.
NOT 1 ON made by Tha I, seconded by C I apsadd I e to recommend
to the C I ty Counc I ! that H i chae I Hue 1 I er be appo i nted
For a 3 year term beginning !-1-90 and expiring 12-31-
92, and In addition assume the balance of Vern
Andersen's term ~hlch expires 12-31-89; and 14111 lam Voss
be appointed to serve the remainder of Brad Sohns term
which wtll expire 12-31-90. I~tlon carried unanimously.
The Commissioners expressed that they would like the new members
to attend their First meeting on November 2?th.
This recommendation will be Forwarded to the City Council on
November 14, 1989.
NOTION n~e by Thai, seconded by Meyer to adjourn the
meeting at 9~35 p.m. Notion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
MINUTES - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - NOVEMBER 16, 1989
The meeting was called to order at 7 AM. Members present:
Paul Meisel, Fred Guttormson, Chic Remien, Mayor Smith, Mark
Brewer. Absent: Tim Kenealy. Also present: John Norman,
Finance Director.
Upon motion by
unanimously, the
approved.
Remien, seconded by Guttormson, and carried
minutes of the October 26, 1989 meeting were
An interview was scheduled for the member vacancy. Ed Shukle had
contacted Carolyn Rosdahl to have her appear at the meeting. She
did not make it to the meeting· Upon motion by Guttormson,
seconded by Remien, and carried unanimously, the Commission
recommended the appointment of Ben Marks to the Economic
Development Commission. The City Council will act on the member
vacancy and recommendation at their November 28th meeting.
A discussion was held regarding the economic development survey
of Mound residents to be included in the City's Newsletter in
January. Chairperson Meisel discussed the questions that were
developed at a prior sub-committee meeting attended by himself,
Brewer and Norman. There were revisions and changes made to some
of the questions. Paul Meisel volunteered to have the questions
typed up and given to Ed Shukle by November 21, 1989 for
discussion at the City Council Committee of the Whole meeting.
The building inventory map was discussed. All the businesses in
Mound have been assigned a number and the following information
has been obtained from the tax book records: address, owner
name, tenant (not totally updated), market value, and Hennepin
County property Identification Number (PID ~). We talked about
what additional information should be included in the building
inventory map. After some discussion, it was decided to contact
the business owners and obtain the following information for the
building inventory map:
space available inside building
approximate rent
current tenants
correct mailing address of owner (Chic intends to send
the Chamber Newsletter to the owners and periodically
ask for an update in vacancies and leasing updates)
It was decided to split up the map among the EDC members to
contact the owners of the properties and obtain the above listed
items. The completed inventory sheets would be brought to our
next meeting.
Economic Development Commission Minutes
November 16, 1989
Page 2
It was decided to discuss at our next meeting how
information regarding the condition of the buildings.
could take a field trip and also discuss the buildings with
building inspector.
The next meeting is scheduled for December 21, 1989 at 7 AM,
the City Council Chambers.
Upon motion by Remien, seconded by Meisel, and
unanimously, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 AM.
Respectfully submitted,
John~Norman
Finance Director
to obtain
Perhaps we
the
in
carried
JN:ls