The URL can be used to link to this page

1989-12-12 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA A~E NDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1989 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 28, 1989, REGULAR MEETING AND THE RECONVENED PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1990 PROPOSED BUDGET OF DECEMBER 5, 1989. PRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION (GFOA) CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING AWARD - FRED CHRISTIANSEN, FINANCE DIRECTOR, CITY OF MAPLE GROVE. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 300:25 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO THE MOVING OF BUILDINGS. Se CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE, WESTONKA POOL BOOSTERS. APPROVAL OF PARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION NOT TO RENEW A DOCK PERMIT FOR THE YEARS 1990 AND 1991 - DOCK SITE #60700, TODD MC MASTERS, 5235 PHELPS ROAD. APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 437:15 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO DOCK DESIGN STANDARDS. GRADING APPLICATION FROM MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING CO. IN ORDER TO PREPARE AND MAINTAIN A FILL SITE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF 14,000 CUBIC YARDS OF SPOIL MATERIAL FROM DREDGING PROJECTS CONDUCTED BY MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING. RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN INCREASE IN M.S.A. MAINTENANCE FUNDS DUE TO INCREASED MAINTENANCE COSTS ON CITY OF MOUND M.S.A. STREETS. 10. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. Pg. 3642-3652 Pg. 3653 Pg. 3654-3656 Pg. 3657 Pg. 3658-3662 Pg. 3663-3669 Pg. 3670-3687 Pg. 3688 Page 3640 11. 12. 13. RESOLUTIONS CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING BONDS: - $1,550,000 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1965 ISSUE; - $2,377,000 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1965, SECOND ISSUE; - $265,000 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1975 ISSUE; - $200,000 G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1976 ISSUE. Pg. 3689-3690 Pg. 3691-3693 Pg. 3694-3696 Pg. 3697-3699 Pg. 3700-3702 PAYMENT OF BILLS Pg. 3703-3717 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS ao Department Head Monthly Reports for November 1989. Pg. 3718-3751 Be L.M.C.D. Representative's Monthly Report for November 1989. Pg. 3752-3753 Ce L.M.C.D. Mailings. Planning Commission Minutes of November 27, 1989 Pg. 3754-3778 Pg. 3779-3782 Ee Fe Copy of Resolution No. 89-11-961R1, Hennepin County regarding the possibility of requiring all cities in Hennepin County to identify one or more sites within the city that could be used for the composting of yard waste. This resolution was discussed last week before the County's Public Service Committee. Also attached is a copy of a resolution adopted by the City of Edina opposing the County's resolution. Pg. 3783-3786 REMINDER: There will be NO Committee of the Whole meeting on December 19 or a Regular Meeting on December 26, 1989. REMINDER: To bring one dozen homemade Christmas cookies to the meeting December 12, 1989. Page 3641 174 November 28, 1989 MINUTES -- MOUI~D CITY COIII~CIL - NOVEI~BER 28v 1989 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, November 28, 1989, at 7:30 PM, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ah- tens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., Deputy City Clerk Linda Strong, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, City Building Official Jan Bertrand, Finance Director John Norman, Street Superintendent Geno Hoff, Water and Sewer Su- perintendent Greg Skinner, Fire Chief Don Bryce, and the follow- ing interested citizens: Pat Meisel, Geoff Michael, Gummel Ostvig, Lorraine Painter, Phil and Eva Hasch, Bruce McComb, Marcy Lemmon, Ed Matheson, Don Jerdee, Gene Smith, Greg Knutson, Joanne and Chuck Champine, Wayne H. Smith, Dorothy Davis, Fred Hanley, Tom Latcham, Jim Bedell, Jeff Andersen and Frank Ahrens. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten- dance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MINUTES MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Johnson to approve the Minutes of the November 14, 1989 Regular meeting and the Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of November 21, 1989, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS City Manager Ed Shukle stated the revised amount of $2142.58 as delinquent. The Mayor opened the public hearing asking if there was anyone present who wished to be heard regarding this item. There was no response. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-146 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2142.58, AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: PRESENTATION OF 1990 BUDGET City Manager Ed Shukle introduced the 1990 proposed budget to the Council, briefly touching on expenses, revenues and various funds. He explained the state legislature's new tax law, which 175 November 28, 1989 transfers Local Government Aid (IX]A) from cities to school dis- tricts. The proposed budget in the General Fund, is only in- creased by 3.8% over the 1989 budget. Finance Director, John Norman, contributed to the explanation of the budget. The Mayor opened the public hearing on the 1990 proposed budget. The following citizens were heard: Tom Latcham, 4711 Island View Drive; Ed Matheson, 2162 Island View Drive, Phil Hasch, 4804 Northern Road; Greg Knutson, 4701 Island View Drive; Chuck Cham- pine, 1550 Canary Lane. Pat Meisel, Chairperson, of Mound City Days requested $5000 be designated to help fund the fireworks during Mound City Days. Lorraine Painter, representing the Wes- tonka Pool Boosters, requested $6,600 from Mound to help keep the pool at the high school open. Requests for pool funding will also be made to the other cities within the school district. Council consensus was to consider these requests at the December 5, 1989 Special Council, meeting at which time the 1990 proposed budget will be discussed at the continuation of this public hear- ing. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Johnson, and carried unanim- ously, to close the public hearing on the 1990 proposed budget and to reconvene the public hearing at the Special Council meeting on December $, 1989. CASE NO. 89-845= REQUEST TO MOVE A HOUSE FROM 3005 BRIGHTON BLVD. TO 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD FOR BRUCE MC COMB Building Official Jan Bertrand summarized the history of this item. She stated the Planning Commissar. asS found the proposed building to meet all zoning regulation ' of the same general character and appearance as other buildings in the vicinity. The proposed resolution includes all the specifics pertaining to moving this house. Item 8 was to be deleted as the owner intends to build a garage and two off-street parking spaces would not be required; MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jessen to concur with the Planning COmmission to approve the moving of a house from 3004 Brighton Blvd to 4723 Cumberland Road, deleting item %8 of the Resolution. The vote was Ahrens, Jensen, Smith voting no, Jessen and Johnson voting yes. Motion failed. Discussion was held regarding the reconfiguration of the heat/cold ducts. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-147 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMIS- SION RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW THE MOVING OF A HOUSE FROM 3005 BRIGHTON BLVD, TO 4723 CUMBERLAND ROAD, DELETING ITEM %8, AND TO INCLUDE THE RECONFIGURATION OF 176 November 28, 1989 DUCT WORK. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. pLANNING COMMISSION RBCON~4__~__WDATION REGARDING AN A~WDMENT TO SEC- TION 300~25 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE RELATING TO THE MOVING OF BUILDINGS Building Official, Jan Bertrand, stated the Planning Commission suggests the need for the house moving ordinance to be amended to require public hearings, and processed as a Conditional Use Per- mit. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously to direct the City Attorney to prepare an amendment to City Code Section 300=25 relating to the moving of buildings, Subd. 3., to include public hearings. CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING MODIFICATION TO ALLOW STORAGE OF PUBLIC WORKS MATERIALS AT TNR EAST AND NEST SIDES OF CITY HAL?. Jan Bertrand reviewed the City Planner's report addressing two issues: Provide a recommendation to the City Council on the possibility of establishing outdoor storage areas to the east and west of the city hall building. Regardless of the Commission's recommendation in item #1, provide a recommended zoning modification to accom- modate the outdoor storage at the city hall site. The recommendations for issue #1 are: The proposed use is inconsistent with city hall and the surrounding wetland environment at Lost Lake due to the inability of the sites to adequately handle on-site storm drainage retention. Both sites (and particularly the western site) are in- herently unsuitable for the proposed use due to topog- raphy and tree cover. The cost of improvements to establish the two areas is not justifiable since three other sites including Lost Lake will still be needed to accommodate public works storage. Issue #2 would require the rezoning of the current R-1 district to a B-1 district and then modifying the B-1 requirements to handle the storage of publicly owned outdoor materials. The recommendation being: 177 November 28, 1989 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that if the City Council eventually finds that no other reasonable alternative to the city hall site exists for public works storage, the B-1 zoning district should be modified to allow "publicly owned materials storage areas" as a conditional use. Performance standards should also be developed to min- imize the impact on the surrounding properties and the natural environment. Council discussed this issue. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Smith to send item back to the Planning Com~ission to develop performance standards for the B-1 district as it relates to publicly owned outdoor storage and to allow its use. Motion carried 4-1, Jessen voting nay. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to exclude from con- sideration both the east and west sites by city hall accord- ing to the recommendations given by the Planner. The vote was Jessen and Jensen, yes; Smith, ~hrens and Johnson, no. Motion failed.. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by &hrens and carried unanim- ously to eliminate the site on the west side of city hall from consideration as a storage area for public works out- door materials. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT The Mayor invited citizens in attendance to address the Council. No one came forth. REQUEST FROM WES OLSEN, 2539 E~RA_LD DRIVE, TO EXTEND RESOLUTION #88-17~ Council discussed this item with emphasis that Mr. Olsen was aware of the variance problem with his garage. The variance was to be filed on the property. Removal or relocation of non- conforming garage was clearly stipulated in the original resolu- tion. Mr. Olsen was not in attendance. MOTION by Smith, seconded by ~hrens to table this item until Mr. Olsen could clarify his recent extension request. The vote was Smith and Ahrens, yes; Jessen, Jensen and Johnson, no. Motion failed. Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-148 RESOLUTION DENYING THE EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION %88-179, WES OLSEN, 2539 EMERALD DRIVE. 178 November 28, 1989 The vote was Jensen, Jessen and Johnson, yes; Smith and Ahrens, no. The motion carried. APPROVAL OF AN 0RDZ~CE AMENDZNG SECTION 437:15 OF THE MOUN~ CITY CODE RELATING TO DOCK DESIGN STANDARD~ Council had questions as to the 72" x 72" section now allowed on L, T, or U docks. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously to table this item until the December 12, 1989 regular meet- ing when explanation can be obtained from the dock inspec- tor. Tom Latcham, 4711 Island View Drive asked Council questions as to the commons dock program. Council suggested he attend the Parks Commission meetings, as they are the advisory commission to the Council on the commons docks program. APPROVAL OF 1990 DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION FORMS AND FEES Council discussed this item. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-149 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE 1990 DOCK FEES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PARK COMMISSION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF PARK COMN!SSION RECOMN~NDATION NOT TO RENEW A DOCK PERMIT FOR THE YEAR 1990 AND 1991 DOCK SITE ~60700, TODD MASTERS, $235 PHELPS RO~ City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the dock inspector had mailed certified notices to Mr. McMasters to clean up the area around his commons dock. Mr. McMasters did not do so, nor did he respond to the dock inspectors letters. Councilmember Jessen stated that he did not attend Park Commission meetings regarding this issue, and that he had been notified of the meetings. Mr. McMasters stated he did not receive any notices, nor did he in- tend to apply for a dock permit in the future. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jensen and carried unanim- ously to table this item until the next regular meeting when information could be obtained on this item from the dock in- spector. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT NO. 8926t STOPLIGHT AT COMMERCE BLVD, AND LYNWOOD BLVD. City Engineer John Cameron stated the County prepared this resolution and it was done so with the assumption that MSA funds 179 November 28, 1989 would be used on this project. Contents of paragraph 2 can be amended to read "...for the prohibition of on-street parking a__s per current conditions on those portions..." Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-150 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS FOR HEN- NEPIN COUNTY PROJECT %8926, STOPLIGHT INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF COMMERCE BLVD. v AND LYNWOOD BLVD. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~SOLUTION APPROVING TW~ CALL OF ~972 IMPROVEMENT BONDS, A PART OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND Finance Director John Norman informed the Council that a 30 day notice was needed to make available these funds in 1990, or if they do not file notice, the funds would become available in 1993. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-152 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE $115,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1972 ISSUE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CANCELLATION OF T~l DECEMBER 26, 1989 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jensen and carried unanim- ously to cancel the December 26, 1989 regular council meet- ing. This item will be published in the Laker. RESOLUTION: "CITIES FI~WT BACK AGAINST DRUGS WEEK" Council discussed this item. Councilmember Jensen indicated a change for the 5th Whereas, paragraph to read" ..and lead to a host of problems such as homicides; robberies, burglaries, domes- tic violence and other crimes; and... Smith moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-151 RESOLUTION DECLARING DECEMBER 3 - 9 AS "CITIES FIGHT BACK AGAINST DRUGS WEEK" The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 180 November 28, 1989 APPOINTMENT OF BEN M~RKS TO TN~ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMI88IO~ City Manager Ed Shukle indicated the Economic Development Commis- sion had interviewed the candidates for the vacancy on the EDC. Their recommendation to the Council is to appoint Ben Marks to the Commission. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-153 RESOLUTION APPOINTING BEN MARKS TO FILL THE VACANCY ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION. TERM EXPIRES 12-31-91. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. pAYMENT OF BILLS MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to authorize the pay- ment of bills as presented in the amount of $127,448.49, when funds are available. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ADD-ON ITEMS WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD AGREEMENT City Manager Ed Shukle asked Council to approve the sub-grantee agreement for the Community Energy Program between the City of Mound, Spring Park, Wayzata and the West 'Hennepin Human Service Planning Board. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-154 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE SUB-GRANTEE AGREEMENT WITH WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERV- ICES PLANNING BOARD FOR THE COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAM The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RECOGNITION OF FRANK LIVINGSTON HONORING HIS 100TH BIRTHDAY Mayor Smith read the resolution recognizing the lO0th birthday of Mound resident Frank Livingston. Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-155 RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING FRANK LIVINGSTON ON HIS ONE HUNDREDTH BIRTHDAY The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City will contact Mr. Livingston to present the document to him. 181 November 28, 1989 LION'S DOI~ATE TO MOUND CANINE City Manager Ed Shukle stated the Northwest Tonka Lions has donated $3500 to restart the Mound Police Canine Program. Also, they have pledged $1000 per year towards the maintenance of the program. ~SOLUTION DIRECTING CITY MAITAGER TO SEEK REQUEST FOR PROPOS&LS PERFORM /%N ECONOMIC DEVELOP~NT PLANNING STUDY WITH THE USE OF YE~RXIV COMMUNITY BLOCK GR~NT FUNDS City Manager Ed Shukle stated the City began the process of up- dating the Comprehensive Plan and the Planning Commission, which is overseeing this project has determined the need for additional information regarding the development of the downtown Mound area. Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 89-156 DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO SEEK REQUEST FOR PROPOS~%LS (RFP) TO PERFORM AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING STUDY WITH THE USE OF YEAR XIV COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. LMCD INFORMATION City Manager Ed Shukle stated there was information passed out regarding the LMCD meetings on December 2, 1989. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A® October 1989 Financial Report as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. Letter to Geno Hoff from the Mound Farmer's Market and Com- munity Services regarding Geno's cooperation on installing the Farmer's Market Sign downtown. C. Park Commission Minutes of November 9, 1989 D. Planning Commission Minutes of November 13, 1989 Ee Economic Development Commission Minutes of November 16, 1989 MOTION by &hrens, seconded by Johnson to adjourn the meeting at 12:15 ~M. The vote was unanimously carried. Meeting ad- journed. Linda Strong, Deputy Clerk Edward J. Shukle Jr., city Manager December 5, 1989 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REOONVENED BUDGET HE&RIN~ The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session to review the proposed 1990 Budget on Tuesday, December 5, 1989, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Finance Director John Norman, Fire Chief Don Bryce, Police Chief Len Harrell, Street Superintendent Geno Hoff, Sewer & Water Superintendent Greg Skinner, Park Director Jim Fackler, Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm and the following interested citizens: Doug Dion, Ray Chamberlain, Beatrice Miller, Roger Beckel, Ralph & Clara Paz, Mike Palm, Rick Williams, Jeff Andersen, and Judy Bryce. The Mayor reconvened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The City Manager recapped the previous meeting. He stated that the request from the Mound City Days Committee for $5,000 for fireworks was already included in the proposed budget. The Manager further stated that the money requested for keeping the pool open will be brought before the Minnetrista and Orono City Council's in the next two weeks. Spring Park has committed support but has given no dollar amount. The Council decided to wait until the School Board considers the pool. The item of weeds on public right-of-way will be discussed this evening. The Council then reviewed the following proposed budgets and asked various questions of the Department Heads. City Council City Manager/Clerk Cable T. V. Elections Assessing Finance Computer Legal Police Civil Defense Planning & Inspection Recycling Streets Shop & Stores December 5, 1989 City Property & Buildings Parks Recreation Contingency & Transfers Capital Project Fund Area Fire Service Fund Liquor Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Cemetery Fund Pension Fund Dock Fund WE~DS The Council discussed the problem of controlling weeds in Mound. Several options were presented. The use of chemicals was ruled out because of pollution to the lake and cost. The purchase of flail mowers and a low boy tractor will be looked at in future years. The Council decided to try hiring youth during the summer to do weed whipping. They asked that the Park Department purchase 2 more weed whips and create a separate $2,000 salary line item for weed removal. RECYCLING Councilmember Johnson stated he feels the City should go to weekly curbside recycling in 1990 because we can still be reimbursed for the costs up to 80% in 1990 from Hennepin County and it would probably increase the participation. There was Council discussion on Hennepin County changing or dropping the reimbursement policy in 1991. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by ahrens to start weekly curbside recycling pick-up as of January 1, 1990. The vote was two in favor with Ahrens, Jessen and Smith voting nay. Motion failed. BUDGET & LEVY RESOLUTION Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #89-157 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,327,090; SETTING THE LEVY AT $1,583,795; AND APPROVING THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR 1990 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. December 5, 1989 MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Smith to adjourn at 11~30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk December 1, 1989 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Mr.'F~ward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager City of Mound H[ 'D OEO 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 4 1989 '180 NORTH MICHIGAN AVENUE SUITE 800 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601 3~ 2J977-9700 FAX: 312/977-4806 Dear Mr. Shukle.' we are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988 qualifies for a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. When a Certificate of Achievement is awarded to a government, an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement is also presented to the individual des- ignated by the government as primarily responsible for its having earned the certificate. Enclosed is an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement for: John L. Norman, Fianance Director The Certificate of Achievement plaque will be shipped under separate cover in about ten weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presenta- tion of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A sample news release is enclosed. We suggest that you provide copies of it to the local newspapers and radio and television stations. In addition, enclosed is the 1988 Certificate Program results representing the most recent statistics available. We hope that your example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excel- lence in financial reporting. If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if we may be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Frederick G. Lant~ Assistant Director/Technical Services Center FGL/d s Enclosures 3&3'3 wASHINGTON OFFICE: SUITE 200 · 'J 750 K STREET NW · WASHINGTON D C 20006 · 202/429-2750 · FAX: 202/429-2755 STATEMENT BY FRED CHRISTIANSEN BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 12, 1989 MAYOR SMITH AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: Good Evening, I am Fred Christiansen, Director of Finance for the City of Maple Grove, and I am very pleased to be here today as a representative of the Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association and also of our national G.F.O.A. organization. Today I am pleased to announce that the City of Mound has achieved a milestone in excellence in financial reporting and public accountability. The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is a program of the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada. This program encourages governments to publish excellent comprehensive annual financial reports and provides recognition and educational assistance to the finance officers preparing such reports. Financial reports which meet program standards are awarded Certificates of Achievement. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by your City, its management, and the commitment by the City Council to excellence in that area. I know a lot of time was spent in the last year compiling the needed information and preparing the report. Especially for John and his staff, since this is the first time you have received the award. Today's presentation is a recognition of that time, dedication and effort. The certificate is a professional achievement that everyone in the City of Mound can be proud of. G.F.O.A. has awarded the Certificate of Achievement to the City of Mound for its financial report covering the year ended December 31, 1988, and you now join 55 other cities, counties, and other governmental organizations in Minnesota, and only about 1150 organizations throughout the nation who have obtained this recognition. On a national basis, Minnesota is one of the leaders in the certificate program, ranking sixth of all 50 states in number of recipients. Those states ahead of us, Texas, California, Illinois, Florida and Ohio, have significantly higher numbers of units of government. You are in an elite group! I want to extend congratulations to you Mayor Smith, and to Members of the City Council, and to John Norman your Finance Director, and to all your accounting staff for your continuing support and interest in maintaining the highest standards of accounting and financial reporting for your City. At this time, I would like to present the Certificate of Achievement Award to Mayor Smith and John Norman. Thank you. THOMAS WURST, P.A_ CURTIS A. PEARSON, dAMES D. LARSON, P.A. THOMAS F'. UNDERWOOD, P,A, CRAIG M. HERTZ ROGER ~1. FELLOWS LAW OFFICES WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 28, 1989 TELEPHONE (51~') 338 -,~.00 ~'Ax N U I~1B~[=~ (61~') RtrL"g NOV 3 0 1989 Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Section 300:25, Subd. 3 - House Moving Ordinance Dear Ed: At the Council meeting on November 28, I was directed to prepare an amendment to Section 300:25, Subd. 3, of the City Code to provide for a public hearing for house moving. I have included an amendment which changes the public hearing from a discretionary matter to being mandatory under the ordinance. I have also deleted one word as it relates to the Planning Commission and suggest that we strike through the word "favorable." It could be read that a moving permit could not be issued unless the Planning Commission approved. As to fees, I have made the application and the process the same as a conditional use permit and have indicated it is the same fee. I note in the Planning Commission recommendation they suggest $200. I thought if we used the same fee as a conditional use permit, it would go up automatically when you change fees for the conditional this with Jan, and if it is in agenda for December 12. CAP:Ih Enclosure u~ permit. Please review o~: , it can go on the Council Attorney Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 300:25, SUBD. 3 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO BUILDING MOVING The City of Mound Does Ordain: Section 300:25, Subd. 3, of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Subd. 3. Conformity of ~uildinq or Structure to Building Code Required. Whether or not a permit is required, no building or structure shall be moved to a location within this City unless it conforms to the building, plumbing, heating, electrical and other construction regulations of this City relating to new structures. In addition to conformity with the applicable code or codes, as minimum requirements, all plumbing for such building or structure shall be by a licensed master plumber, and residential buildings shall have a 100 ampere electrical service. If construction, alterations, or repair work on such building or structure will be necessary to make it conform to such regulations, permits for such work shall be obtained before such building or structure is moved, which permits shall make provision for the doing of such work within 90 days after such building or structure is located in this City. Failure to make such building or structure conform to such construction regulations within such 90 day 'period shall constitute a violation of this Section 300:25, and each day that such violation is continued after such 90 day period shall constitute a separate offense. No such permit shall be granted except upon order of the City Council after recommendation upon the application by the City Planning Commission. The City Council may, ~t it~ discretiun, £=quire shall hold a public hearing together with advertised notice of hearing f=~r.t~: - c~n=:~era=ion-J~ ~ ~e~a-kd thc before granting denying ~such permit. Notice of the public hearing shall be published in the officialn~wspaper at least ten('10) days prior to the bearing. Notice of the hearing shall also be mailed to owners of property located within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the outer boundaries of the land ~o which the building is propose~'t° be moved. The processing o__f ~he application shall be treated t~e same a__s an application for a ~onditional Use Permit under Section 23.505.3 of the City Code and shall pay the same fee as is required b_xthe City ~o process a Conditional Use Permit. No such building or structure shall be moved to a location within the City unless it 3 .55 will conform to the zoning regulations of the City, will conform to the front-yard and other setback and lot area requirements, and will be a building or structure of the same general character and appearance as other buildings or structures in the vicinity. The City Council shall determine whether or not such building or structure will be permitted at the proposed location. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Adopted by City Council Published in Official Newspaper 1987 TOTAL LABO~ 79 $1,069.18 $10,09S $ 7,782 818,830 COS Total pOO:~ Blanket o&vtngo IO~ discount Pet 9sst TOTALS tO date,: POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SAVINGS: Lighting modA£AcatAone 84,047 8(~84.~e) 8(~8.5o) 03,504.09 848,566 8(4,6Z5) $(Z,846) 842,105 0 0 NET_COST ~iER YRA!~; 842,105 e the uo~ ! of the aFsA SwAmuAn rs ram ~omew~at~ ~he percentaoe chmr~ed to APPROVB:D 1989-90 BUI~ET: Revenue:841,500 Attachmente~ BuoAneso Dept. 88-89 cost memo 88-89 ExpendAture report 89-90 Expenditure budget Expend.:841,SS0 file:DonS: Pool-90B CITY NA#E Nound Onooo SpntnQ Pank TOTAL Pence~t of AGES AGES POPULATION Otst. Pop. 0-5 yrs, 6-16 yrs, 3?22 17~ 150 410 9454 43~ 589 1526 7172 33~ 168 432 1640 ?~ 32 110 TOTALS 21988 lOOT 929 2478 .CITY mARE NINNETRISTA M~ND ORONO SPRINB PARK $12,000.00 $2,031.29 $5,159.54 $3,914.13 $895.03 $12,000.00 AGES 17-20 yrs. 496 166 36 LINE ~ OF SCH. POP.OVER~ OF ADULT TOTALS AGE POP, 20 YR8 POPULATION ?35 I?~ 298? 2610 61~ 6844 39~ 776 16~ 6396 177 4~ 1463 891 4298 100~ 17690 100~ ftle;C;\mp:CITYPOP2 WESTONKA PUBLIC $CHOOL IHDEPENDEHT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 277 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD · MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 December 12, 1989 TO: CITY MANAGER ED SHUKLE MOUND MAYOR AND GOUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: DR. JAMES L. SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT #2?7 SUBJEGT: REQUEST O~ THE WESTONKA SGHOOL DISTRIGT TO FORM A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN GOMMUNITY SERVICES AND THE GITIES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRIGT TO OPERATE THE SCHOOL-COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL. Per formal resolution, the Westonka school board has authorized me to request assistance in operating the swimming pool located in the Mound Westonka High School. This swimming pool is used extensively as a community instructional and recreational facility. The concept suggested is that 50% be funded by the General Fund of the district and 50~ be funded by a combination of city funding, user fees from Gommunity Services and Fund raising efforts by the Pool boosters. The amounts proposed are: $12,000 from the four cities, and $8,000 from the pool boosters and Gommunity Services. The School Board proposes a working relationship using a Joint powers agreement under Minnesota statutes Section 471.59 and other applicable statutes. The agreement would establish a working relationship between the Westonka Gommunity Services Department and the cities of District #2??; Mound, Orono, Spring Park, and Minnetrista. Representatives from the Westonka Pool Boosters have contacted the cities and the initial response has been favorable. As per the direction of the School Board December 11, 1989, a request to enter into a Joint powers agreement with the cities is hereby made. The agreement would specify that approximately 30% of the total operating cost or $12,000 would be prorated to the cities. Based on that proration, we are requesting that $6,600 be considered as the Gity of Mound's share. The 3oint powers agreement would specify the operating conditions of the pool and the rights and privilege of the parties to the agreement. With the proposed agreement, 50~ of the pool time would be dedicated for community use and 50% for school instruction including the athletic programs. We appreciate the City of Mound's interest in supporting the only indoor swimming facility in our area. The agreement being proposed is one which provides assurance that the swimming pool will be open, for the foreseeable future. If you have need for further information or conversation regarding this to meet you~ ~-~s-~. Please con~act me in regard matter, I am available -~ to your disposition of this request'; ......... CITY NIOL NI) M,D,L)ND ~'dINNE~C:"~ E~3~4 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 30, 1989 Mound City Counci I Dell Rudolph, Dock !nspect~. Dock Site #60700, Todd McMasters Background on above subject, with recommendation not to renew a dock permit to Todd McMasters of 5235 Phelps Road, Mound. Mr. McMasters was assigned this site with the understanding that he would contact Former holder of site (Doug Thelen) on the dis- position of his dock materials. Former holder could remove or give to McMasters who then could use or get rid of materials. This is a common procedure when a docks change owners. This was explained to McMasters per a phone call when he put in his dock. When dock was inspected on July 19, 1989, materials were still there and a notice was sent to McMasters to remove before permit would be issued. Second notice was sent on August 23, 1989, and then a phone call made on September Il, 1989 when McMasters agreed to take care of problem. When checked again on October 10, 1989 the materials were still on site. Notice was sent on October lO, 1989 by certified mail stating that recommendation to the Park Commission was being made not to renew permit In 1990. Attempt by Post Office to deliver certified letter was made on October Il, October 17, and October 26 and it was never claimed and was returned to City Hall. The Park Commission approved the recommendation to deny the per- mit and sent it onto the City Council. Another certified letter was sent on Nove~er 15 informing him that this matter would be on the November 28 Council agenda. This was not picked up before the council meeting. All of the above information is documented and copies are avail- able if needed. Many applicants would be happy to remove the materials at their site in order to gain city dock privileges. It is my recommendation to deny Todd McMasters city dock pr i v t !eges For the 1990/91 season. Z Z Z CITY ¢)f MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND MINN£SOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 November 15, 1989 Certified Hail Mr. Todd HcMasters 5235 Phelps Road Hound, MN 55364 REs Dock Site #60700 Dear Mr. McMasters~ At the regular Park Commission Meeting on November 9, 1989, a recommendation was made to the Ctty Counctl to revoke your dock license for 1990 and 1992 per City Code Sectton 437:10, Subdivi- sion 8 and 9. The City Counctl will review this recommendation at their meeting on November 28, 1989, 7:30 p.m., at Ctty Hall. IE you wish to appeal, It must be submitted In writing and mailed to the City Manager via certified mall, or personally delivered to the Ctty Manager. The City Manager must receive this appeal by Thursday, November 22nd. If you have any questions, please contact me. /~fm Fackler /~/Park D t rector JF:pJ cc: Ed Schukle, City Manager Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspector SUBJECT: CITY OF MOUND ~411Mym)od ~ {~1;) 4?2.11ss DAT[ r /~-/0- ~--~"~' I MESSAGE REPLY SIGNED SENDER: SNAP OUT YELLOW COPY ONLY. SEND WHITE AND PINK 3Lt,,I RECIPIENT: RETAIN WHITE COPY. RETURN PINK COPY WITH CARBON INTACT. CITY of DOCK NUMBER I was by your dock today to inspect it so your 1989 permit could . be issued and attached. .This was not done for the followin~ reasons: Please correct the above in the next ten (10) days and I will/ return to issue your 1989 tag. / OU for your to. operation . Dell Rudolph Dock Inspector TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Directo~'~ REF: Dock Design 'Ordinance 12-1-89 The addition of the allowance of one 72"X 72" dock section on a L, T or U shape dock is to provide for a bench, or a general gathering area for users. This is not provided for in the current ordinance and was recommended to be added by the Park Commission during its meeting on June 8, 1989. The particular dock site width, location on the lake, dock design, boat size and other inherent charactoristics will determine if the Dock Inspector will approve the dock plan. Channel dock design is not addressed in the current ordinance and are under greater limitations due to allowance of navagation of the channel while allowing space for docking a boat. To eventually bring all docks into compliance, while having consideration for current docks, the Park Commission felt that docks that under go expansion, modification, replacement of 50% or more of a dock that is damaged, destroyed or deteriorated after June 1, 1989 will have to meet the new design standards. Administering these standards is done by doing three to four on site inspections each season to verify that the dock design and boats moored are what was listed during application. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 437:15 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO DOCK DESIGN STANDARDS The City of Mound Does 0rdain~ Section 437:15 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Section 437:15. Maximum Dimensions, Prohibited Design of Docks. dDocks for which a license is required by this Section 437:15 shall not be l~ss than 24" wide or more than 48' in width with the exception that one 72" x 72" section i_~s allowed on L, T, or U sha ep_~d docks provided ~hat this confiquration b_ge ~imite~ t~ setback of lO feet from private property and shall not infri__~on an adjacent dock site. Docks shall not exceed 24 feet in length except where necessary to reach a minimum water depth of 36", using Lake Minnetonka elevation levels of 929.40 feet above sea level. Channel docks~ where naviqation is limited and docks must be installed parallel t9 th__~e shoreline, cannot be less than 24" wide or more than 72" in width. The ~ength shall b__e limited t~o ~ setback of 10 feet fro~ private property or no__~t t_9o ~nfrinq~ o__n an adjacent dock site. Docks shall be of plank or rail construction. Dock posts shall be of equal height above the dock boards and shall be at least two rail construction and constructed to comply to standards and specifications approved by the Dock Inspector. All docks shall be built or placed with the longitudinal axis thereof perpendicular to the shoreline unless variations otherwise may be permitted in accordance with the dock location map. pocks which are in existence ~une 1, 1989~ shall be brouqht iht9 compliance with all provisions of th___geCityCode when expansion or modification is requested, o_ir replacement of 50~ o_~r more of any such dock that is damaged, destroyed, deteriorated. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Adopted by City Council Published in Official Newspaper ...-- A. THOMAI WuIqsT, P.A. CUI~TII A. P~.AIqSON, P.A ~AI4E, I D. LAR$ON, P.A. THOk4AI Ir. UNDI;~WOOD, P,A. C~AIG M. Mc~rz ROGC~ U. Irl;~.l. ows LAW OIr IrlC Ir S WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ IIOO fIRST BANK I~LACI' WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554OZ November 13, 1989 NOV I (ell) 338.~oo Mr. Jim Fackler Park Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Ordinance Amendment Section 437:15 Dear Jim: Pursuant to your letter of November 7, 1989, we have put your suggested changes into ordinance form. I am returning this ordinance to you with a copy to Ed Shukle. I have one question or comment relating to the last section of the ordinance which is being changed. ' I am wondering why ~ we in effect allow for non-conforming uses on docks when they ~J' are taken out each year and replaced. A building or something ."-~,..: of that nature needs a non-conforming status, but I am not %<~i sure that that is true as it relates to docks which were in ~': existence on June 1, 1989. Why can't the docks being installed .~ in 1990 be in compliance with the new ordinance? If the ordinance is adopted in its present form, you should have some means of cataloging the docks which are in existence on June 1, 1989,k~ ' ' 'F which are not in compliance so that you know and can watch - .:- .~ those docks. Otherwise you will have a very difficult time ~'~ '" administering the ordinance since whoever has an illegal dock ' ~ will claim that it was in existence in 1989. ~" City Attorney CAP:Ih Enclosure cc: Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager Parl~ Con~ntssion Hinutes May I!, 1989 Page Two Maintenance Permit: Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Road, butidtn~ 38' x 15' dock on city owned shoreline/channel. Jim Fackler, Park Director, explained that Mr. Beystrom has revised his original plan to build a dock from 38' x 15', to a 38' x 6' dock. City Code Section 437:15 states "No dock . . . shall be less than 24 Inches wide or more than 48 Inches in width, and the dock shall not exceed 24 Feet in length except where necessary to reach a minimum water depth of 36 inches." Fackler added that even though this dock is on a channel and parallel to the land, it ts classified as a straight dock. Applicant, Rodney Beystrom, spoke on his behalf. He stated that he was not aware oF the 4 foot wide rule. The existing dock posts were rotting, so he replaced them. The previous dock was 48' x approx. 5.5'. Beystrom also stressed the amount oF labor that was involved to install the dock and the cost of materials, he added that the posts were embedded 42" into the ground. It is a permanent dock, one that is not removed each year. The Park Commission confirmed that this area is not accessible For any other docks. The Commission discussed the minimum width and length and how this pertains to a "channel" dock. Weber sug- gested changing the ordinance to include a description for "channel" docks. The Commission directed staff to create wordage for a description on channel docks stating the size limitations for this type of dock. MOTION made by Weber, seconded by Jessen to recommended that the dock at 4466 Denbigh Road be maintained temporarily through the end of 1989 at 38' x 6'. Motion carried 7 to 2. (Those In favor: Andersen, Weber, dessen, Byrnes, Burke, As- leson, ar~J Balleyl Those c~sc~d: Clough and C, asey.) Park Commission Minutes June 8, 1989 Page Two Proposed revisions to Section 437=15 Maximum Dlmenslons~ Prohibited Designs of Docks, The Park Director explained that the revisions made tn Section 437=15 will limit the size o6 a 'L' or 'T' dock sectlon/plat6orm to 7Z" x 72", The revision also Includes wording for channel dockage requirements. MOTION n~e by Weber, seconded by Asleson to recam~nd approval of the revised Section 437=15, contingent upon City Attorney's al~roval. Hotlon carried unanimously. Mound City Code Section 437:20 elevation levels of 929.40 fee= above sea level. Docks shall be of plank or rail construction. Dock posts shall be of equal height above the dock boards and shall be a= least two rail construction for docks 24 inches to 30 inches in width, and rail docks in excess of 30 inches in width shall be three rail cons=ruction and constructed to comply to standards and specifications approved by the Dock Inspector. All docks shall be built or placed with the lon$itudinal axis thereof perpendicular to the shoreline unless variations otherwise may be perm/tted in accordance with the dock location map. Section 437:20. Penalties. Any person or persons who shall violate any of the prohibitions or requirements of this ordin-nce shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. In addition to any criminal penalties as above provided, the City Council may remove or cause to be removed any dock erected without a license as required by this Section 437, or where any license has been revoked as provided by this Section 437. Re,oval of unlicensed docks or docks which fail to comply with the City Code will be at the expense of the owner or licensee. No person convicted of violatin$ City ordinances relatin$ to docks rill be issued a dock license for the present or for the next boatin$ season, and said person forfeits any priorities set forth in this Section 437. - Section 437:25. License Fee. The annual license fee shall be as set by the Council in Section 510:00. Residents of the City of Mound 65 years of age or older shall pay 50I of the required license fee for a straisht dock. A full license fee shall be charsed to all persons for all L, T, or U docks and boathouses. Mound City Code Section 437:10, Subd. ii storage shall be done in an orderly, compact, and unobtrusive Docks and associated hardware must be removed from the conanons and/or public lands between June 1st and September 1st of each year. ® Storage shall be restricted to dock materials, dis~antled docks, and dismantled boat lifts. ® The Park Com~ission, City Dock Inspector, and City Council shall 'review the dock location map each year and designate areas available for winter storage and also designate the areas restricted because of the conditions heretofore stated. Subd. 11. Removal Deadline. All private docks abutting any public road, street, park, or commons must be removed from the waters of Lake Hinnetonka or other navigable waters no later than December 31 of the license year unless it is a winter approved dock location as shown on the master dock map. Subd. 12. Dockint of Non-O~med Watercraft. Docking of boats not o~ed by the dock licensee is not permitted for a period in excess of 48 hours. The City may check with the State of Hinnesota to determine if the boat docked at the licensed dock is o~ned by the licensee and/or a member of the same household as the licensee. Any boat registered to someone not a member of the licensee's household shall not be docked in excess of 48 hours unless a Temporary Visiting Dockage Permit has been obtained from the City and the fee established by the City Council in Section 510:35 has been paid. No more than one Temporary Visiting Dockage Permit may be issued in any calendar year to an individual dock licensee. All Temporary Visiting Dockage Permits shall contain the State registration number of the boat and shall be limited to 21 days. Any violation of this Section 437 by the dock licensee shall result in the loss or revocation of the dock license unless the City Council shall determine upon evidence submitted by the licensee that there were mitigating circumstances. The City Council may determine that revocation is too severe a penalty and may then ~ondition said license so that any future violation will result in automatic revocation. Subd. 13. Licenses Non-Transferable. Dock licenses and permits issued by the City are personal in nature and may be used only by the licensee or members of their household. No dock licensed by the City or located on public streets, roads, parks, or public commons may be rented, leased, or sublet to any person, partnership, or corporation. If a licensee or permit holder rents, leases, sublets, or in any manner charges or receives consideration for the use of his or her dock, his or her license shall be revoked. Section 437:15. Maximum Dimensions,. Prohibited Desisns of Docks. No dock for which a license is required by this Section 437:15 shall be less than 24 inches wide or more than 48 inches in width, and the dock shall not exceed 24 feet in length except where necessary to reach a minimum water depth of 36 inches, using Lake Hinnetonka McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Twin Cities St. Cloud 15050 23rd Ave. N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Telephone 612/476-6010 Facsimile 612/476-8532 December 7, 1989 Engineers Planners Surveyors MS. Jan Bertrand Planning and Zoning City of Mound 5341Ma~wood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: Grading Application Anthony's Floral 1861 Commerce Boulevard MFRA #7279 Dear Jan: As requested, we have reviewed the latest grading application for filling the old wastewater treatment ponds west of Anthony's Floral. This application is almost identical to the previous ones, so I have enclosed all that information, including my latest review letter dated July 7, 1988. Our position on this matter would remain the same as stated in said letter of July 7, 1988. Conditions 1 and 2 are included in the application this time; therefore, Item 3, which requires permits from the Watershed District and the DNR, would be our only recommended condition. As before, we have not required that existing vegetation, such as brush, trees, etc., be removed prior to filling because corrective action has never been taken to remove such materials from previous fill operations at this site (see previous correspondence and resolutions). The City could also require that the applicant furnish a bond to insure that all conditions are met, but we do not feel this is necessary because the location will only be accessible to Minnetonka Portable Dredging. The City will have to periodically inspect the site to make sure the fill operation is conducted according to the permit. If any violations are noted during these inspections, the permit holders would be notified to take corrective action or the permit would be suspended. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact US. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:jmj Enclosures 70 An Equal Opportunity Employer DATE: December 1, 1989 GRAD I NG .APPL I CAT I ON APPLI CANT' S NAME: Minnetonka Portable Dredging Co. 9184 PERHIT NUMBER: PHONE .t~: 47.4._-9/454 ADDRESS:Clifford Reep, 500 West Lake Street, Excelsior, MN.. CITY: 55331 OWNER'S NAME:Anthony Vandersteeg, Anthony,s F.loral P. HONE ~: 472-1176 ADDRESS: 1861CQmmerce Blvd., Mound, MN 55364 .CI.TY: SITE ADDRESS: 1861 Commerce Blvd.~ Mound~ 'MN 55364 LEGAL ·DESCRIPTION: Commence at a point in the East line of Govt. 'Lot 1~ a distance 215.05' South from the Northeast corner thereof, thence West parallel with the North line thereof, Continued, Sec. 14, T117N-R24W (See reverse side for instructions) DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Prepare and maintain a fill site for the placement of 14,000 cubic yards of spoil material, from dredging projects conducted by Minnetonka Portable Dredging. Additional information included with enclosed letter. OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS:Plans submitted to Ninnehaha Creek WSD'on 12/1/89. NUMBER OF CUBIC-YARDS TO BE MOVED: Approximately 14,000 Cubic Yards. BOND REQUIRED: $ I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application and state that the informa- tion is correct and a/gree to comply with the City of Mounds Codes and the State of Minnesota Laws. ~ / . ~. OWNER: Signature of Permittee: FEE: $ F PLAN CHECKING FEE GRADING PERMIT FEE TOTAL FEE APPROVED BY PERMIT TO EXPIRE WITHIN 1 YEAR OR 180 DAYS AFTER FILL PLACEMENT IS DISCONTINUED. December 1, 1~89 Minnetonka Portable Dredging 500 West Lake Street Excelsior, MN 55~51 Ms. 3an Bertrand Zoning Administrator gity of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Application for fill placement at Anthony's Floral. Dear Ms. Bertrand: Enclosed are copies of the Filling and Grading plans for Anthony's Floral and additional information supplemental to the Grading Application. The project consist of the placement of approximately 14,000 cubic yards of spoil material from dredging projects conducted by Minnetonka Rortable Dredging. The spoil material (dredging spoil) is organic, sand and gravel or clay which is dredged from the bed of Lake Minnetonka at various locations. The fill material will be free from objectional materials, tires, bumpers etc. The spoil material will be trucked from the dredging projects to Anthony's Floral located on Cry. Rd. 110. The site will be prepared by constructing an erosion control fence around the fill area. A safety fence will also be constructed near the fill edge and will include a post and chain gate that will be locked by Minnetonka Portable Dredging. Only fill material from dredging projects completed by Minnetonka Rortable Dredging will be placed at the site. The locked gate will prevent the illegal filling of objectional materials by others. The first phase of filling will include the placement of soil material along the south boundary of the the fill area to construct a soil dike. After completion of the south dike grading, the slope ~ill be seeded and mulched. The south dike along with the existing dikes on the property will contain the remaining fill to prevent the erosion of the spoil material. Erosion control fences will be maintained as a buffer to the dikes. The placement of fill material is expected to take 2-4 years untill final completion. All fences, gates dikes and erosion control fences will be maintained through out the project. Upon completion of the final filling, the area will be graded according to the enclosed plan, and all areas will be seeded and'mulched. Re .specr~ubmit ted, Cliff ~rd Reep Minnetonka Portable Dredging ~(Applicant) A y steeg /~/ Anthony's Floral (Owner) MINNBTRI~TA SHORE~/OOD DUTCH LAKE ® Q H.W.- 93 ~.2 NGVL 1,,,)'J y~:-gz.V~ NGVD .... :' ~ 942 ( \ / / ! / / ! 940 ~ I ROUND LINE reFILLJ HORIZONT,~L 1'= 5C;' VE RTIC'"L 3& ?y McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Twin Cities St. Cloud 15050 23rd Ave. N. Plymouth, MN 55441 3uly 7, 1~88 Tele0hone 612/476-6010 Engineem Rannem Su~eyom Ms. Jan Bertrand PLanning and Zoning Department City of Mound 534l Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: Grading Application Anthony Van Der Steeg Property 1861 Commerce Boulevard MFRA #7279 Dear 0an: As requested, we have reviewed the most recent application for filling .a portion of the old treatment ponds behind Anthony's Floral, and have the following comments and recommendations. As you are aware, the area proposed'to be filled is contiguous to the area which Anthony's was using as a fill site a few years ago. A permit was issued to Mr. Van Der Steeg, then revoked after the conditions of tne permit were not followed. The permit was then reinstated, contingent upon certain conditions being met. To our knowledge, there has been no activity on this site for the last two years, which in itself would void the last permit. Enclosed are copies of the previous resolutions. If the property owner and the City of Mound wish to view this area as virtually unbuildable in the. future, then we see no problem allowing this filling without meeting the normal requirements such as soil borings, compaction tests, etc. However, if the City wishes to follow the requirements of the building code (Appendix 70) and assume the fill area is intended to some day support structures, then very different guidelines need to be met. Our recommendation, based on the past history of this site, would be to grant this fill permit, if the following conditions are met: 1. Fill area is graded and seeded upon completion. Silt screen to be installed between fill area and lake if fill placed is higher than existing dike separating the old pond from Dutch Lake. Permits to be acquired from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and DNR. Very truly yours, Enclosure McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. Oohn Cameron RE3OLUTXON NO. 86-21 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A GRADING AND LAND RECLAMATION PERHXT AND ESTABLiSHiNG RESTRiCTiONS WHEREAS, the City Council granted a permit to fill and reclaim certain land by a Resolution adopted September '25, and numbered Resolution No. 8q-150 and said resolution established oertatn criteria and requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 85-152 on .November 26, 1985, suspending the grading and land reclamation permit because Mr. VanDerSteeg has not received a Watershed Permit and because materials containing decayable.matter had been placed on the site; and WHEREAS,-this Council has told Hr. VanDerSteeg that the permit will not be reinstated until he comes into compliance by obtaining a Watershed Permit and removes the decayable materials and he now indicates an opportunity to ob.rain good soils; and WHEREAS, the Council YanDerSteeg but does not want him Watershed Permit. desires to to proceed cooperate 'with until he obtains his NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the'Cit~ of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The permit described in Resolution No. 8~1§0 is reinstated subject to the following conditions: ac Obtaining a permit with the Minnehaha Creek 'Watershed District. bo Stockpiling can then be allowed by the City Engineer. and the City Man,ager if they have established conditions whic~ will assure that the applicant -will meet the standards established by the Watershed District and Resolution No. 84-150 and a final grading plan has been approved by the City Engineer. The materials to be stored on the site shall' be limited in quantity and quality to meet the grades and soil conditions established by the Watershed District, the prior resolution and the City Engineer. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Paulsen and seconded by Councilmember Smith. jO ~ebruary 18, 1986 The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmat~ve: Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson, Polston and Smith. ~he following Councilmembers voted in the negative: ~O~eo Attest: City Clerk P~T Cf F~lt A?.~i!O~"S F~CRAb ~ ~NHOUSF~ of f,u~:~f: ........ ~,~t .i..- o~' .,,u,-,e:' of ~.'.e k~undsri=.s of ~h~ Nor~:, :ertlfF t~t tk~ ~s ~ tru~ ~ ~.orr~:et -~ .... "'" "' '" ~t ~t l, S~etlcm lA, ~z~hi~: llT,~:orth~ ~ng~ 2~ ~ ~ ~:' tn* 5~~ :T~r, ci~l ~mrie~n, ~rit.~ ~s fc,~ow~: ~-~i~m~n5 ~t ~ ')31nt on ';h~ North ~ne of :.,:i,' to~ ~i~t:,~ ~.02 feet ~s~ fr :iSt:~nce of k65 fee%: %h~nee Ue~ m,r~.~-':~ '~ .... L · .~ .. · ~ .... i': ~st line ",'~' ~h,- :~nt of ~.: m~; '.lr-~ce ';ors~ %n '%,:' ~in% of ........... '' ' ~ tnjress ar.d e~3ss un(, .':~,'n'~ Dt.r.~oscs over ~..? Se'it': ~ f~t of %he t~*.~st ,~%!on ~f ~.~ exes%in6 b~i~ini.s ti~er~(,n. I% toes nc~ ~,~r% to show other = lCO' r, GORDON R. COFFIN CC Go.~-:j~ ~ -7o:-~ T,-~ -. ,: -~ .... ( ? !: ~' '1 '? ".' ' · November 26~ 1985 RESOLUTZON NO. 85-152 RESOLUTION TO SUSPEND THE GRADING AND L~ND RECLAHATION PERHIT OF ANTHOI~ VANDERSTEEG~ 1861COP~ERCE BLVD. WHEREAS, on September 25, 198~, the City Council issued a Grading and Land Reclamation Permit (Resolution ~8~-1§0) to Hr. Anthony VanDerSteeg, 1861 Commerce Blvd. 'to fill behind the aforementioned address; and -WHEREAS, on November 12, 1985, the City Counc'~l ~assed Resolution ~85-~, regard~n~ the above mentioned Gradin~ and Land Reclamation Permit. NOW~ THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Hlnne$ota, does hereby suspend the Grading and Land' Reclamation Permit until such time as Hr. VanDerSteeg.. ~omplies with the original conditions in Resolution ~8~-150; and the cond~tions ~n Resolution ~8~-1~. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councllmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Paulsen. The'following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: · Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson, Polston and Smith. .. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. .. Md'Yor' ' ' Attest: City Clerk ~ovember I~ 19~ RESOLUTION NO. 85-1~3 RESOLUTION REGARDING GRADING AND LAND RECLAHAT~ON P£RHIT OF ANTHONY VA~DERSTE£G, 1861 COHM£RC£ BLVD. WHEREAS, on September 25, 198 , the City Council issued a Grading and Land Reclamation Permit (Rsolution #8~-150) to Mr. Anthony VanDerStees, 1861 Commerce Blvd. to fill'behind the aforementioned address; and WHEREAS, on November 5, 1985, the City Engineer and the BUildin$ Inspector inspected the area behind 1861 Commerce Blvd. and found at least 5 violations of the 9 conditions in Resolution #8~-150; and . WHEREAS, of major concern is the dumping of construction .debris that contains materials which wil~ support decay such as plywood, boards, sheetrock, acoustical tile, cardboard, panelinE,. aardboard sidin$, carpet, foam pads, brush, trees and other material which probably will never decompose such as plastic, metal and P.V.C. pipe, tires, steel studs, concrete block, brick and fiber~lass insulation; and WH-EREAS, Mr. VanDerSteeE has never completed the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and has not received a permit from them; and WHEREAS, soil boring have never been provided to the City from Mr. VanDerS~eeg. which was also a condition of the Permit; and WHEREAS, it has now been discovered that there is an old concrete control structure in the dike between the old treatment ponds and Dutch Lake which has an open top on it and should have a solid, permanent cover placed over it so it is not a hazard to children in the area; and WHEREAS, th~ ~ity Engineer '~nd the Building Inspector have recommended that the Permit be revoked until the following three conditions are.met: 1. All unacceptable material be removed from the site. 2. The owner posts a bond in the amount of $10,000.00 to insure that all conditions of the permit are met. '3. The owner follow thru and secure a permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, asked that the following conditions be met: 1. Mr. VanDerSteeg to work with the Staff on a Plan of action and timetable for removing the illegal fill November 12, 1985 and report back to the Council in 2 weeks. 2. Suspend any further dumping until there is a plan of action for the next year and all requirements of the original Permit are met. Hr. VanDerSteeg to find out who dumped the illegal materials. Cover the concrete structure on the rear of the property with exterior plywood. 5. Have the soil testing done. 6. Obtain the necessary permit f~om the Watershed District. Hinnehaha Creek The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember. ~aulsen and seconded by Councilmember Peterson. The following Counoilmembers voted ~n 'the affirmative: Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Smith. The following Counoilmembers voted in the negative: ~one. Ha'¥o~ Polsgon was absent and exousedo Mayor Pro Tem Attest: City Clerk ... November 6,- 1~85 Rel~ly To: 12~00 Industrial Park Bouleverd Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Honorable Mayor anO Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Ninnesota 553~4 SUBOECT: City of Mound Grading Permit Anthony's Floral FI<A File #7297 Dear Nayor and Councilmembers: On Tuesday, November 5, 1985, 3an Bertrand and myself inspected the area behind Anthony's Floral which is being filled. As you may be aware, the City grante~ Nr. VanDerSteeg a grading and land reclamation permit on September 25, 1984 (Resolution No. 84-150), a copy of which is attached. This permit has 9 conditions stipulated in it, of which we feel at least 5 are in violation. Our major concern is the continued dumping of construction debris that contains materials which will support decay such as plywood, boards, sheetrock, acoustual tile, cardboard, paneling, hardboard siding, carpet, foam pads, brush and trees. Other material which probably will never decompose such as plastiq, metal and P.V.C. pipe, tires, steel stuos, concrete block, brick and fiberglass insulation is also visible. A small amount of the fill material could be defined as clean fill which is required by the permit. We would consider this site a land fill rather than a land reclamation project. A stop work order was issued on 11/5/85 and Mr. VanDerSteeg was informed that this matter would come before the City Council on Tuesday, November 12, 1~85. We have also contacted Minnehaha Creek Watershed District regarding Mr. VanDerSteeg's Permit Application No. 84-117. Action on this permit was tabled at their regular board meeting on Ouly 19, 1984, pending submission of ) items. This requirement was never met, therefore, no permit has been issued to Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers November 6, 1985 Page 2 Mr. VanDerSteeg. No measures have been taken to control erosion or prevent sedimentation as required by the City and the Watershed District. We also observed an old concrete control structure in the Oike between the old treatment ponds and Dutch Lake which has an open top to it. We feel this is a definite hazard to chilOren in the area, especially with the Grandview School and a trail system so close, and therefore it needs to have a solid, permanent cover placed over it. Oan and myself would recommend to the council that this permit be revoked until three conditions are met immediately. (1.) All unacceptable material be removed from the site. (2.) The owner post a bond in the amount of $10,000.00 to insure that all conOitions of the permit are met. (5.) The owner follow thru and secure a permit from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. If the council should have any questions, Oan and myself will be present at your meeting on November 12, 1985. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3ohn Cameron OC:jmj cc: Oim MahaOy Ninnehaha Creek watershed District Antonie VanOerSteeg 1861 Commerce Blva. Mound, MN 55364 September 25, ~9~ RESOLUTION NO. 8~i-150 RESOLUTZON TO APPROVE A GRADING AND LARD RECLAHATION PERMZT FOR GOYERHMENT LOT 1, SECTION lq-11?-2q CPID #1q-11?-2q lq 0003) 1~HEREAS, Antonie VanDerSf. eeg, owner o£ f. he property described as the North ~3§ feet of Government Lot 1, Section l a- 117-2~ ~est of the 5th P~no~pa~ Her~d~an, E~CEPT that part ~be~eo~ de,or,bed as follows: Beginning at a point on the Horth line of sa~d lo~ d~an~ 606.62 fee~ We~t ~rom ~he .Northeast corner of sa~d lot; thence East to the Northeast corner ~f said lot; thence South along the East l~ne of sa~d lot a distance of ~65 feet; thence West parallel with sa~d North line to an intersection with a line drawn South parallel' with said East line from the point of besinning; thence North to the point of besinnin~, to~ether with an easement for ~n~ress and esr.ss and driveway purposes over the South 50 feet of the Weset 246 feet of said excepted tract, and the location of all existin5 buildings thereon· PID ~]~-]~7-2~ ~q 0003; has applied for a &radZn~ and land reclamation permit pursuant to the City Code,' Section ~.200; and WHEREAS, City Staff has reviewed the request and does recommend approval with stipulated conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the requested grading and reclamation permit for the Anthonie VanDerSteeg property as stated on ~he attached Exhibit "A" with the following conditions: 'The Exhibit "A" fill area be adhered to by the applicant with the silt fencing installed at the perimeter continuously and maintained in good.condition. Seeding or sodding shall be accomplished by October 1, 1986, or when the filling is completed, whichever date is sooner. The fill material that has been placed will have all material r~moved that will support decay. At the recommenda'tion of the Building Official; a soils engineering firm will be retained and a report submitted to the City Engineer to verify compliance of this at the owner's expense. .. Submit. to the City Engineer any other required permits; i.e. Watershed District. No further fill material will support decay with a 10t (or record) to be kept by the property owner of fut'ure fill to be used stating the date received, where the Septet, bet ~5, 1 fill was transported from, the name of the transporter and the number of yards received. The owner is required to provide garbage/refuse service by an independent service for his floral and home use. £ros$on and dust control shall be by the use of haybales staked and secured in place or equal and dust control as approved by the City £ngineer and Hinnehaha Creek Water- shed District. This permit will expire October 1, lg86, or'may be renewed by the City Xanager. The permit Is non-transferable to ~ new property owner and it may be revoked after notification to the property owner. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councllmember Charon and seconded by Councllmember dessert. · The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polzton. oo The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. l~ayor Jtttest: City Clerk CITY of MOUND 53~1 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jon Elam, City Manager Jan Bertrand, Building Official September 13, 1984 Anthony VanDerSteeg's Grading Permit Request I am forwarding to you Mr. VanDerSteeg's fill/grading permit application, Exhibit A survey and proposed fill elevations from Mark Gronberg, Engineers/ Surveyors, Minnehaha C~eek Watershed correspondence, photographs and the appli- cab]e City Codes, U.B.C. Chapter 70 and Ordinance 467, which pertain to his application. I would recommend placing his request on the City Council Agenda for Septem- ber 18th or 25th, whichever fits their schedule better. I would like to comment on the past history and the survey submitted. The past couple of years I have.visited the site and I have seen debris.such as, but not limited to tires, brush, trees,, shingles, corrugated metal, papers, barrels, planks, concrete, pop cans, sheetrock, roofing and styrofoam in the fill area. It has been operated as a "Clean Land Fill". The existing "after the fact" fill area involves'approximately an area of 200 feet by 250 feet by lO foot deoth of fill plus an additional area to be filled with 25,000 cubic yards. I have requested that Mr. VanDerSteeg state what purpose he intends for the site. He has told me that he has not charged a fee to put debris and dirt on the prop- erty. If the site is not intended to continue as a "Land Fill", than it is my opinion that.he has rendered the land useless for development for many, many years continuing with the same type of material and construction debris. Some of the materials already placed will decompose over the years (50 to lO0) and settling will take place without extensive soil corrections. He has not had a refuse pick-up service for his business operation, according to his comments to me. The City Council may want to arrange periodic inspections of the filling process depending on the schedule of completion. A bond may be requested in the event that the City would need to make corrective measures on behalf of the owner's inability to complete the work. cc: John Cameron COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 September 7, 1984 Ns. 3an Bertrand Planning & Zoning City of Mound 5341 May~ood Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: City of Hound Grading Permit Application Anthony's Floral File $7297 OearOan: We have reviewed the pian submitted by Anthony's Fiorai for filiing of the iow area between their buiiding and Outch Lake. ~he foii6wing are our comments and recommendations. The pian and/or appiication shouid state the ourpose of the fili, type of fiii, proposed surface restoration, and erosion controi measures. According to Section 35:230 of the new ordinance recently adopted, fiii materiai cannot contain any substances which supports decay. We wouid in- terpret this to mean that existing trees wouid have to be removed before any fiii is piaced. Before the permit is granted, aii requirements of other agencies, such as the DNR, PCA, and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District need to be met. If you have any questions or if additionai information is required, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. OC:sj December 5, 1989 RESOLUTION NO. 89- RESOLUTION REQUESTING AN INCREASE IN M.S.A. MAINTENANCE FUNDS DUE TO INCREASEDMAINTENANCE COSTS ON CITY OF MOUND M.S.A. STREETS WHEREAS, Municipal State Aid streets are on a rotating basis for seal coating; and WHEREAS, some older constructed State Aid streets are increasingly needing repair; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the City Manager is hereby directed to write the State Aid Engineer requesting Mound's Main- tenance Allotment be $33,000.00 per year because of the added maintenance cost. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk A THOMAS WURST, P.A. CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A. dAMES D. I--ARSON, P.A THOMAS Ir. UNDERWOOD, P.A. CRAIO M. MrRT'Z LAW OFFICES WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ IIOO FIRST SANK PLACE WEST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 29, 1989 NOV 0 1989 (S~2) 338- d~.O0 IrAX NUMBER Mr. John Norman Finance Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Calling Outstanding Bonds - Capital Improvement Bond Fund Dear John: I enclose herewith four proposed resolutions and four notices of redemption for the remaining issues in the capital improvement bond fund. We have different paying agents and different purchasers in all cases, so I thought it better to put them on an individual basis. I would suggest that you review these documents and if you find them in order, they can be placed on the Council agenda for December 12. We called and checked the costs of publication between Northwestern Financial Review and Finance and Commerce. It appears Finance and Commerce is a little cheaper, and Northwestern Financial REview is not publishing on December 23 or December 30, and therefore to make the December 16 issue, it needs all the notices by December 8. It obviously seems simpler to use Finance and Commerce since it meets the legal requirements. The following resolutions are enclosed. 1. Resolution for $1,550,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1965. Dain was the purchaser, and First National Bank of St. Paul is the paying agent. 2. Resolution for $2,377,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1965, Second Issue. First National Bank of St. Paul was the purchaser and is also the paying agent. WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ Page 2 Mr. John Norman November 29, 1989 3. Resolution for $265,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1975. Juran and Moody was the purchaser, and First National Bank of Minneapolis is the paying agent. 4. Resolution for $100,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1976. First National Bank of St. Paul was the purchaser and is also the paying agent. We can consult after the December 12 Council meeting, and I suggest that you immediately send copies of the resolutions to the paying agents and the purchasers of each issue. We will then work out publication in Finance and Commerce of the four notices of redemption. If you have any questions or comments concerning any of this, please contact me. e/i Y~°~' V . trul City Attorney CAP:ih Enclosures cc: Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE $1,550,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1965 ISSUE WHEREAS, on May 1, 1965, the City issued $1,550,000 of General Obligation Improvement Bonds to mature in the years 1967 through 1991, and WHEREAS, on February 1, 1979, all outstanding bonds maturing after that date became subject to a call for redemption at the option of the City in inverse numerical order on said date and any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest and a premium of 2% if redeemed prior to February 1, 1982, and without premium if redeemed February 1, 1982, or thereafter, and WHEREAS, after the February 1, 1990, maturity, there will be thirteen bonds outstanding in the amount of $5,000 each maturing on February 1, 1991, and WHEREAS, there are currently five outstanding bond issues which will be available for call in the next three months and there is sufficient money in the Capital Improvement Bond Fund to pay the balance due on said bonds, and WHEREAS, it is determined that it is in the best interests of the City to call for redemption of said bonds and to terminate the Capital Improvement Bond Fund which currently is made up of five outstanding bond issues sold by the City between 1965 and 1976, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Mound, as follows: 1. Ail outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1965 dated May 1, 1965, having stated maturity dates of February 1, 1991, shall be called for redemption immediately. 2. The outstanding bonds total $65,000, and the City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to transfer to The First National Bank of Saint Paul, in St. Paul, Minnesota, the paying agent on said bonds, sufficient monies to pay principal and interest and any outstanding expenses to call the bonds. 3. The City Clerk, City Finance Director, and City Attorney are further authorized and directed to publish a Notice of Call for Redemption in a periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class for its metropolitan area which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service. The Notice of Call for Redemption shall be published on or before December 30, 1989. A copy of said Notice of Call for Redemption is marked Exhibit A and is hereby incorporated in and made a part of this resolution. Mayor Attest: City Clerk EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION $1~550,000 GENERAL OBLIC~TION I~PROVF~ENT BONDS OF 1965 CI~ OF #OUND HENNEPIN COUNTYv NINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that, by order of the City Council of the City of Mound, Henncpin County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on February 1, 1990 all outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1965, dated May 1, 1965, having stated maturity dates of February 1, 1991, the outstanding bonds being called totaling $65,000 in principal amount. The bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to February 1, 1990, on which date all interest on said bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption ar{ requested to present their bonds for payment at The First National Bank of Saint Paul, in the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, on or before February 1, 1990. Dated December 12, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Francene Clark City Clerk City of Mound RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE $2,377,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1965, SECOND ISSUE WHEREAS, on December 1, 1965, the City issued $2,377,000 of General Obligation Improvement Bonds to mature in the years 1967 through 1991, and WHEREAS, on March 1, 1979, all outstanding bonds maturing after that date became subject to a call for redemption at the option of the City in inverse numerical order on said date and any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest, and WHEREAS, after the March 1, 1990, maturity, there will be nineteen bonds outstanding in the amount of $5,000 each maturing on March 1, 1991, and WHEREAS, there are currently five outstanding bond issues which will be available for call in the next three months and there is sufficient money in the Capital Improvement Bond Fund to pay the balance due on said bonds, and WHEREAS, it is determined that it is in the best interests of the City to call for redemption of said bonds and to terminate the Capital Improvement Bond Fund which currently is made up of five outstanding bond issues sold by the City between 1965 and 1976, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Mound, as follows: 1. Ail outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1965, Second Issue, dated December 1, 1965, having stated maturity dates of March 1, 1991, shall be called for redemption immediately. 2. The outstanding bonds total $95,000, and the City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to transfer to The First National Bank of Saint Paul, in St. Paul, Minnesota, the paying agent on said bonds, sufficient monies to pay principal and interest and any outstanding expenses to call the bonds. 3. The City Clerk, City Finance Director, and City Attorney are further authorized and directed to publish a Notice of Call for Redemption in a periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class for its metropolitan area which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service. The Notice of Call for Redemption shall be published on or before January 30, 1989. A copy of said Notice of Call for Redemption is marked Exhibit A and is hereby incorporated in and made a part of this resolution. Mayor Attest: City Clerk EXHIBIT A I~YI'IC~ OF CALL FOR P. EDEIIPTION $2,377,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION INPROVENENT BONDS OF 1965, CI~ OF NO~ HE--PIN CO~, NI~E~A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that, by order of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on March 1, 1990 all outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1965, Second Issue, dated December 1, 1965, having stated maturity dates of March 1, 1991, the outstanding bonds being called totaling $95,000 in principal amount. The bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to March 1, 1990, on which date all interest on said bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment at The First National Bank of Saint Paul, in the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, on or before March 1, 1990. Dated December 12, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Francene Clark City Clerk City of Mound RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE $265,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1975 ISSUE WHEREAS, on November 1, 1975, the City issued $265,000 of General Obligation Improvement Bonds to mature in the years 1978 through 1992, and WHEREAS, on February 1, 1987, all outstanding bonds maturing after that date became subject to a call for redemption at the option of the City in inverse numerical order on said date and any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest, and WHEREAS, after the February 1, 1990, maturity, there will be seven bonds outstanding in the amount of $5,000, with three of the bonds maturing on February 1, 1991, and four of the bonds maturing on February 1, 1992, and WHEREAS, there are currently five outstanding bond issues which will be available for call in the next three months and there is sufficient money in the Capital Improvement Bond Fund to pay the balance due on said bonds, and WHEREAS, it is determined that it is in the best interests of the City to call for redemption of said bonds and to terminate the Capital Improvement Bond Fund which currently is made up of five outstanding bond issues sold by the City between 1965 and 1976, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Modnd, as follows: 1. Ail outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1975 dated November 1, 1975, having stated maturity dates of February 1 in the years 1991 and 1992 shall be called for redemption immediately. 2. The outstanding bonds total $35,000, and the City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to transfer to First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, the paying agent on said bonds, sufficient monies to pay principal and interest and any outstanding expenses to call the bonds. 3. The City Clerk, City Finance Director, and City Attorney are further authorized and directed to publish a Notice of Call for Redemption in a periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class for its metropolitan area which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service. The Notice of Call for Redemption shall be published on or before December 30, 1989. A copy of said Notice of Call for Redemption is marked Exhibit A and is hereby incorporated in and made a part of this resolution. Mayor Attest: City Clerk EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION $265,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1975 CITY OF ~OUND HENNEPIN COUNTY~ MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that, by order of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on February 1, 1990 all outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1975, dated November 1, 1975, having stated maturity dates of February 1 in the years 1991 and 1992, the outstanding bonds being called totaling $35,000 in principal amount. The bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to February 1, 1990, on which date all interest on said bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment at First National Bank of Minneapolis, in the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, on or before February 1, 1990. Dated December 12, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Francene Clark City Clerk City of Mound RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE $200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1976 ISSUE WHEREAS, on October 1, 1976, the City issued $200,000 of General Obligation Improvement Bonds to mature in the years 1979 through 1993, and WHEREAS, on February 1, 1989, all outstanding bonds maturing after that date became subject to a call for redemption at the option of the City in inverse numerical order on said date and any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest, and WHEREAS, after the February 1, 1990, maturity, there will be nine bonds outstanding in the amount of $5,000 each maturing on February 1, 1991; February 1, 1992; and February 1, 1993, and WHEREAS, there are currently five outstanding bond issues which will be available for call in the next three months and there is sufficient money in the Capital Improvement Bond Fund to pay the balance due on said bonds, and WHEREAS, it is determined that it is in the best interests of the City to call for redemption of said bonds and to terminate the Capital Improvement Bond Fund which currently is made up of five outstanding bond issues sold by the City between 1965 and 1976, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Mound, as follows: 1. Ail outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976 dated October 1, 1976, having stated maturity dates of February 1 in the years 1991, 1992, and 1993 shall be called for redemption immediately. 2. The outstanding bonds total $45,000, and the City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to transfer to First National Bank of St. Paul, Mn., the paying agent on said bonds, sufficient monies to pay principal and interest and any outstanding expenses to call the bonds. 3. The City Clerk, City Finance Director, and City Attorney are further authorized and directed to publish a Notice of Call for Redemption in a periodical published in a Minnesota city of the first class for its metropolitan area which circulates throughout the state and furnishes financial news as a part of its service. The Notice of Call for Redemption shall be published on or before December 30, 1989. A copy of said Notice of Call for Redemption is marked Exhibit A and is hereby incorporated in and made a part of this resolution. Mayor Attest: City Clerk EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF CALL P0R P.i~DENPTION $200,000 GENERAL OBLIC~TION I#PROVEHE~ BONDS OF 1976 CITY OF #OUND HENNEPIN COU~T~, MINNE~TA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that, by order of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on February 1, 1990 all outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976, dated October 1, 1976, having stated maturity dates of February 1 in the years 1991 through 1993, both inclusive, the outstanding bonds being called totaling $45,000 in principal amount. The bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to February 1, 1990, on which date all interest on said bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment at First National Bank of St. Paul, in the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, on or before February 1, 1990. Dated December 12, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Francene Clark City Clerk City of Mound BILLS ......... DECEMBER 12, 1989 BATCH 9113 BATCH 9114 44,375.97 109,941.38 TOTAL BILLS 154,317.35 3'703 P~E AP-C02-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MO(JND DATE 1113:[ TIME 15.43. VENDOR INVOICE ~E HOLD INVOICE )~NBR DATE DATE STATUS B0547 P~E-PAID 11/.30/89 11/30/89 BEU~OY CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL AMOUNT 3,1~.76 3,193.76 3193.76 DESCRIPTION LIQ JRNL-Q) ACCOUNT NUMBER 71-7100-9510 1010 PRE-PAID AMOUNT CI4ECK ! DATE 31~.76 30034 11/?- C0888 PRE-PAID 3,176.00 11/30/89 11/3O/89 3,176.00 CITY COU~FFY CREDIT UNION ~ TOTAL 3176.00 CR UNION 11/25 PR JR,-CD I010 3176.00 30(05 Il/SO C0920 PRE-PAID 11130189 11/3O/89 CITY ~ '~UND VENI~ TOTAL 45.29 45.29 45.29 REPLEN P/C-POLICE JRI~.-CD 01-4140-2200 1010 45.29 30029 11/28; ClO01 PiUE-PAID 11/30189 11/30/89 CONtlSSIO~R DF ~ ~ TOTAL 2,334.00 2,334.00 SIT 11/25 PR JRM_-CD 01-2040-00Q0 1010 2334.0~ 3(X}38 I1/30 Dl175 PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/3O/89 I~IEL NICEUM VE]~X]R TOTAL 2T/,50 277.50 277.50 RESRV SEVEI~qNCE-NICO~ ~ -CD 01-2300-0220 1010 277.50 30021 I1/I? D1179 PRE-P~ID 11/3O/89 11/30/89 7'70.00 770.00 770,00 W/C REIMB-11/4 INJ-HUGGETT dRIlL-CD 01-3895-(XX)0 1010 770.00 300~ I 1/25 D1235 PiCE-PAID DELTA DENTAL 11/30/89 11/30/89 VENDOR TOTAL 1,1b4.15 14.~ 37.25 37.25 51.b5 1,304.70 1304.70 DEC DENTAL 11/25 PR DEC DENTAL-RETIREE DEC DEI~TAL-RETIREE DEC DENTAL-RETIREE DEC DENTAL-RETIREE JRM.-CD 01-2040-0000 01-4190-1510 01-4280-1510 01-4140-1510 71-7100-1510 1010 1304.70 30052 11/30 D1259 PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/89 DEPT DF NATURAL RESOURCES VENI~ TOTAL 1,912.50 1,912.50 1912.50 81-1285-0000 1010 1912.50 30023 11/21 E1429 PRE-PAID PHILLIPS 11/3O/89 11/3O/~ VEND[R TOTAL 540.12 819.12 18.~- 1,340.25 1340.25 LIQ WINE DISC JRM_-CD 71-7100-9510 71-7100-9520 71-7100-!~0 1010 1340.25 30028 11/2! GlO,SS P~UE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/89 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURA~NCE VE)NE~DR TOTAL 1,46,3.00 I, ~:,3.00 14~3.00 DEF C8~ JR~-CD 11125 PR 01-2040-0000 1010 1463.00 30043 11/30 ¢//J Joo~-/~ ~oo ~__ PAGE 2 AP-C02-OI VENIX]R I~¥OICE O~E IIWOICE ~ DATE DATE STATUS G1971 PRE-PAID 11/3O/89 11130189 GROUP ~ALTH PLA~ VENOOR TOTAL 61972 ~-PAIO 11130189 11130/89 GRIGGS COOPER & C0~¥ ~dqOOR TOTAL H2145 PRE-PAID I1/3O1~ 11/~)/89 ~ CO St~M~RT & COLLECT* ~ TOTAL 123O1 PR~-PAII} 11/30/89 11/30/89 ICMA RETIREI~NT TRUST-457 VE~IX]R TOTAL I ~)4 P~E-PAII} 11/30/89 11/30/89 ICMA RETIR~ME]~I' IRUST-401 VENI)O~ To!rAL J'2579 PRE-PAID ~ BROS W~OLESALE LI* ~ TOTAL L2817 PRE-PAIO 11/30/89 11/30/89 LA~ ENFORCEME'ff[ LABOR SER* VE]~]OR TOTAL L29~ PRE-PAIl} 11/30/89 11/30/89 LUTZ TREE SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 83090 PRE-PAIl} 11/30/89 11/30/89 · ' CENIER ~ALTH PLA~ VENOOR TOTAL M3370 PR~-PAID ~ POLLUTIO~ ~ A~E~C ~ TOTAL PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND MOLNI' ESCRIPTIO~ 21.80 HOSP 11/25 21.80 21.80 515.75 LIQ 313.75 WIG 16.59- DISC 7.35 ~T ~.26 ~-CD ~.26 ~.~ ~-CD 512.~ 512.~ ~-~ 512.~ 91.~ 91.~ ~-CD 91 .~ 1,596.~ LIQ 1,~.45 ~I~ 43.~ 2~.~ 62.~ 1,187.~ ~-~ 1187.~ ~7.~ 97.~ ~-CO 97.~ ~,~ ~-CD OI-2040-O(XX) 1010 71-710~-9510 71-710~-9520 71-7100-9560 71-7100-9600 1010 1010 01-2040-0000 1010 1010 71-7100-~510 71-7100-9520 71-7100-9560 1010 01-2040-0000 I010 01-1190-0000 01-4340-5110 1010 01-2040-000~ 1010 78-7800-4110 1010 PRE-PAID DATE 11/31) TIME 15.43. ChlEC) CLEO( ! DATE 21.80 30048 11/30' 820.26 30025 11/21 288.46 30042 11/30! 512.90 30040 11/30 91.98 30041 11/30 2636.65 30026 11/21 44.00 3(X)51 11/30 1187.00 30031 11/2S 97.84 30049 11/3G PAOE 3 ~-C02-01 INVOICE ~ ~TE ~TE STATUS M3401 PRE-PAID 11/30/89, 11/.30/89 MN RETIREMENT SYSTEM VEND~ TOTAL M3455 PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/89 MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 32O VENDOR TOTAL M3620 P~E-PAID 11/30/139 11/30/89 P3950 PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/89 11/30/89 11/30/139 ; CIANS OF MN VE)EW]R ;OTAL Q4171 PRE-PAID 11/30/B9 11/30/89 QUALITY #I~ & SPIRITS VENDOR TOTA& R42~ PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/89 RED-RAJ ~S VENDOR TOTAL 54.5OO PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/89 STATE ~ ~ ~ND VEN~ TOTAL S4511 PRE-PAID 11/30/8~ 11/30/89 STATE CAPITOL CREDIT L{qlO~ VENDOR TOTAL S4550 PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/8'9 STATE TREAStJRER VEN1XI~ TOTAL W5560 PRE-PAID 11/30/89 11/30/89 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MDUND AMOUNT 28{3.00 288.00 288.00 595.6,5 595.65 595.65 66.95 64.95 133.90 133.90 6,330.48 6,330.48 494.12 494.12 494.12 2,895.79 619.31 64.11- 3,450.99 10,272.93 10,272.93 10272.93 498.33 498,33 498.33 15.00 1~.00 ~.74 ~.74 DESCRIPTI~ DEF C13~ 11/25 PR J~NL-CD UNION 11/2~ ~ POSTG FOR WTR BILLS Pi)~TG FOR WTR BILLS PEF~q 11/25 PR J~I-CD HOOP 11/25 PR JR)l-CD LIQ WI~ DISC dRN.-CD ~ FEES ,JRJ~&-CD FIT 11/25 PR ~ ~I~ 11/25 PR JRN.-CD S-B EX~ FEE-HARDINA ~ -CD E]'E~U] BILL REF'RES~K[S dRJ&-CD 01-2040-0000 1010 01-2040-0000 1010 73-73(X)-3210 78-7800-3210 1010 01-2040-0(00 1010 01 1010 71-7100-9510 71-71(X)-9520 71-7100-9560 1010 01-41~0-4270 1010 01-2040-0000 1010 01-2040-0(0)0 1010 78-7800-4110 1010 01-41,50-2200 1010 DATE TIME P -PAID C EC} AMOL~T OEC~ ! DATE 2~8.00 30044 11/30 595.65 3005~) 11/30 133.90 30024 11/21 6330.48 30039 11/30 494.12 30047 11/2 3450.99 30027 11/21 653.00 30030 11/2E: 10272.93 30037 11/30 498.3:3 30046 I 1/30 15.00 30036 11/~ 34.74 30022 11/21 P~E 4 AP-C02-OI VENDOR INVOICE ~ WESTON~ FOODS Z6046 MICHAEL ~VAGE PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MOUND INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT VEI~)OR TOT~ 34.74 PRE-PAID 30.94 I1/30/~ 11/30/89 30.94 VENDOR TOTN. 30,94 TOTAl. N.L VENDORS 44,375,97 DESCRIPTIDN BAL OF HYD JACK-~qVAOE JRNL-CD 22-4170-2200 1010 PRE-PAID AMOUNT 30.94 DATE 11 TINE 15.4.3 CHEC~ C~CK I DAT~ 30032 11/28 PAOE 1 AP-C02-O1 DATE STATUS AETCO, INC. A0431 AllENA ~ CLEANING 12/06/89 12/06/89 ~ TOTAL 12/06/89 12106/89 VENDOR TOTAL 12106/89 12/06/8~ UEI~X)R TOTAL BAll~E CO~ANY B0543 BA¥SIDE FLORAL B0580 12/06/89 12/06/89 ~ TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 ~ TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 BILL CLARK OIL CO~ANY UENI)(]R TOTAL C0802 12/06/89 12/06/89 CAN°BELL ENTERPRISES VENDOR TOTAL C0820 12/06/89 12/06/89 CARGILL SALT DIVISION ~ TOTAL C0~20 12/06/89 12/06/89 CITY OF MOU~ VENI]OR TOTAL PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MOUND 23.55 ~3.54 27.73 80.18 27.41 11.77 11.77 11.77 11.77 229.49 229.49 7.50 7.50 12.50 2.50 30.00 S6.62 S6.62 S6,62 25.60 3'2.41 32.41 32.41 3,573.25 3,573.25 3573.25 12.57 12.57 12.57 DESERIPTION NOV OFFICE SteP'LIES NOV OFFICE SL~PLIES NOV OFFICE SUPPLIES NO/ OFFICE SUPI~.IES NOV OFFICE SUPPLIES NOV OFFICE SUPPLIES NOV OFFICE SUPPLIES NOV OFFICE SUPPLIES NOV OFFICE SUPPLIES JRM. oCD BATONS dRT4.-CD CARPET CLEAN-DEPOT ,.~.-CD NOV OXYOE){ ND/OXYGE]q NOV OXYGEN NOV ACETYLENE ,JI~VL-CD OIL di~N.-CD S~V~°PYH~qRE ,JRi~.-CD ~ ~T JKVL-CD LIQ ST~ ~ ~-CD 01-4040-2100 01-4090-2100 01-4140-2100 01-41~-2100 01-4340-2100 Ol 71-7100-2100 73-7300-2100 78-7800-2100 1010 DATE 12' TIME 14.: 01-4150-2200 1010 01-4340-2330 1010 73-7300-2200 78-7B00-2200 01-4290-2200 01-4290-22~ 1010 01-23(X)-0220 1010 01-4290-2250 1010 01-4140-4270 1010 01-42q30-2340 1010 71-7100-3740 1010 9//7' 3log PAGE 2 P URCH ASE d OURN A L DATE 12/' AP-C02-01 CITY 0~ MO~D TINE 14.4 VENDOR INVOICE I)JE HOLO NO. INVOICE )~BR DATE DATE STATUS C0940 C~EAH STEP RENTAL CO~O 12/O6/8~ 12/O6/8~ q~ TOTAL COAST TO COAST C0970 12/O6/8~ 12/O6/89 V~ TOTAL 121O618~ 12/O6/8~ COCA COLA BOTTLIHG-MIOGT q,~ ~T~ C1010 12/~ ~I~TI~ ~IT~ ~ TOT~ C11~ 12/~/~ 12/~/~ ~Y ~I~TI~ ~TS ~ TOT~ 12/~/~ 12/~/~ ~Y DIS~I~I~ ~ ~ TOT~ D1320 IX]NALO BRYCE E1420 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE F1549 FINANCE & CON'ERCE 12/O6/8~ 12/O6/~ ~ TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 9B~OR TOTAL 12/O6/89 12/O6y99 VE)E)OR TOTAL PR]UNT 25.3~ 42.3O 67.68 67.68 67.97 36.20 214.12 10,~5 4.87 I3.94 133.33 9.58 7.53 58.0~ 18.~ 15.56 591.02 591.02 4~.40 427.40 ¢27.4~ 319.73 319.73 319.73 21.00 21.00 21 3,595,32 3,595.32 417,00 417.00 417.00 5,027,00 5,027.00 5027.00 NOV RUG RENT NOV f~ I~NT ,.JRNL-CD NOV HI)dE SLJPPLIES NOV HI)WE OUPPI. IES NOV HDME (~dI~q. IES-CI)D NOV PA)ME SUPPLIES FRT-MIDMEST BOLT NOV HOWE SUPPLIES NOV ~)ME SUPPLIES NOV HI)WE SLPPLIES NOV PEME (~JPPLIES NOV ~ IilPPt. IES NOV HI)WE sLmPPLIES NO~ MIX PAGER REPAIR dRNL-CO NOV BEER dRM.-CD NOV (]4IEF SALARY JRNL -CD 72 BOdD CALL NOTICE JRNL-CD 01-4320-4210 71-7100-4210 1010 01-4320-220~ 01-4340-2200 40-6000-2200 01-4280-23(X) 01-42~80-3210 01-4290-2250 22-4170-22(X) 73-7300-2200 73-7300-2300 78-7800-2240 78-7800-23(X) I010 71-7100-9540 1010 2~-4170-3820 1010 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 22-4170-1370 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 30-6000-6120 1010 PRE-PAID AMOUNT 3'1o'I PAGE 3 P U RCH A S E J 0 U RN A L DATE !2/i AP-C02-OI CITY O~ MOUND TIME 14.4 FI5~ 12/0~/89 12106/89 FIRE CONTRDL EXTINOUIS}~R VENIX]R TOTAL F1580 12/06/B9 12/06/89 FIRE INSTRUCTDRS A,,qSN VE)~IOR TOTAL F1690 12/06/89 12/06/89 FDUR STAR BAR SUPPLY VENDOR TOTAL F1711 FRANCKS TRUCKING F1720 12106/89 12/06/89 VENDOR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 FRAA~ MADDEN & ~ UENDOR TOTAL F1726 12/06/89 12/06/B9 FRESI-~TER FOUNBATION ~IENDOR TOTAL 12/06/8~ 12/06/~ GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE ~ IDIAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 C,E~AL ~ICAIIONS VENDOR TDIAL 81831 12/06/89 ~ REPAIR SERVICE VENDOR IDIAL G1840 GENUINE PARTS CO G1870 GERALD BABB 12/06/89 12/06/89 VENDOR TOTAL 12106/89 VEI41)DR IOIAL AI~OUNT I]ESCRIPIIDN ~.~ RECHO FI~ EXTI~ 01-4140-~70 ~.40 JlI~L-~ 1010 ~.~ !~.11 FIRE ~S ~-4170-2280 1~.11 ~-C0 1010 1~.11 27.~ NOV MIX 71-7100-9540 ~.91 NDVMI~ 71-71~-95~0 ~.47 dl~l.-Cl) 1010 ~.47 253.~ NOV~T 71-71~-9&00 253.~ JI~IL-~ 1010 5,095.~ ARBITRATI~ltl~Jll/17 5,095.~ JRi~.-CO 1010 Mg.~ ~TS 81-4350-2200 ¢9.~ Jq)I.-CD 1010 Mg.~ 280.~ JR)i.-~ 1010 5.~ ANTET4~IA 01-4140-2200 5.~ JRT4.-C~ 1010 5.~ 4~.~ ol:l}l.-CO ~010 10.43 FI~INGS ~-4170-2200 lO.M3 dRT4.-~ 1010 10.43 2:~o8.~ NOV ~ SALARY ~-4170-13~ 258.~ dRT4.-CO 1010 -PAID 04 $'110 PAOE 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL ~llE 12/( AP-C02-OI CITY DF MOUND TI~ 14.4 DUE HOLD ~TE STATUS 12/06/89 1210618<) VENDOR TOTAL HAYDEN-~U~PH¥ H2140 12/06/~ 12/066/89 ~,~rNI)DR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/8~ ~ CO S~ERIFF~ DEPT ~lkKl(]R TOTAl. PRODUCTS 1.2910 LINDA STRONG L2925 LOUD & CLEAR MARI(k'TING 12/06189 12/06189 VENDOR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 VENDOR TOTAL 12/06/09 12/06/89 VE)~I]RTOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 VENDOR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 VIEND(]~ TOTAL 12/06/~ 12/06/~ V~EN~)OR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 VENIX)R TOTAL AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 15.~0 ~ ~TER ~ ~.~ NOV ~TER COOLER 12.~ ~ WATER [X](]LER 4.~ NOV ~I'ER COOLER 4.93 NOV WATER CI)]LE~ 73.65 JRNL-CD 73.65 2~.00 REI~AIR ~SSOR 245.~ REPAIR CIIN:~lrSSOR 245.~ REPAIR CON:~UESSOR 737.~ JRNL-CD 737.98 1~.65 OCT BOOKING FEE 144.~ ,.I~U~.-CI) l~.&5 1,831.75 OCT BOARD 1,831.75 JRIt-CI) 1831.75 18.~ OVETFJHOES 18.3~ dl~-CO 18,3~ 6.88 MILF~ 6.88 ,JRM.-C1) 1,236.75 PU~ INSP 1,2'36.7'5 J;U~.-CD 19,59 ELECTRODE HOLDER 19,59 JRt~.-CI) 19,59 ~.10 XMAS PARTY EXP ~.10 44.10 01-4140-4100 01-405~3-2200 01-4280-2200 73-7300-2200 78-78(X)-~ 1010 01-4280-3810 73-7300-38(X) 75-7800-3800 I010 01-4110-4250 1010 01-4110-4250 1010 01-4190-2240 1010 71-71(X)-2~X) 1010 01-4190-3100 lOlO 01-4290-2310 1010 01-4020-4100 1010 01-4140-4100 I010 PRE-PAID N~UNT PAGE 5 AP-C02-01 VENOOR INVOICE OLE NO. INVOICE ~ DATE OATE STATUS PURCHASE CITY DF MOUND AI'~NT DESCRIPTION JOURNAL DATE 12/( TIME 14,4 12/O&/~ 12/~/~ VII DISTRIBUTOR VEIk~R TOTAL M3170 12/0~/89 ~ll~D WAST CONll~]L CDI'~II* VENDOR TOT~ 12/~/~ 12/~ MI~ ~T~, I~ ~ TOT~ ~71 12/~/~ 12/~/~ · ~T~~ ~TOT~ 12/~ 12/~/~ ~ ~Y FI~ & ~T ~ TOT~ ~15 ~ ~T ~ ~ ~ T~ ~70 12/~J~ 12l~/~ ~ V~EY ~STI~ LA~ATD ~ TDT~ ~3490 12/06/89 12/0~/8~ MOL~ID FIR1E I)EP~ ~ TOTAL 12/~/~ 12/~/~ MOUND FIRE Rt-LIEF ~ ~ TOTAL MI'KA BOAT WORKS 12/0&/8~ 12/06/~ VENDOR TOTAL 3,640.80 NOV BEER 3,(,40.90 ,.k't4L -CD 31,~9.0S EC ~ SERVI~ 12,294.%- [mEC ~ SER'UI~ 615,86- ~C ~ SERVI~ 18,650.23 ,_IRIS. -CD 70.00 90 I)LmES-IfrICA SPQRTg'tI-PPD 70.00 JI~-CI) 70,00 83.76 CELLULAR TELE 83,76 JRNL-CD 83.76 10.00 ~T~Y FEIE-~S 10.00 ,JR~L-CD 10.00 23.00 WATER A~oLYSIS 23.00 JR~.-CO 3,~6.25 NOV SALARIES 1,000,00 NO~ mINT 636.50 ~ DRILLS 5,&32.75 JRNL-CD 4,871,83 ~C FIR1E RtELIEF PE]~ISI~ 4,871.83 JRI~.-CD 4871.83 83.52 CARB KIT,FL~T,ETC 83.52 dP~ -CD 83.52 k"q)5.76 NOV ELECTRICITY 71-7100-9~'~ 1010 78-7800-42~30 78-I 190-00(0) 78-~12-0000 1010 01-12t~-O(X)O I010 01-4140-~ 1010 22-4170-4110 1010 01-4140-4100 I010 73-7300-3100 I010 22-4170-1.':K'~0 ~-4170-3190 ~-4170-1380 I010 95-9500-1400 1010 22-4170-2200 1010 01-4280-3710 PAGE 6 PUR CHAS E JDURNA L DATE 12/( AP-C02-01 CITY DF MOti~D TI~ 14.4 12/06/8~ 12106/~ NOR~ STATES POMER CO VE)iI)DR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/~ PAT DALY ~ TOTAL P3994 PAUSTIS & 9(]~49 VE)EM]R TDTAL P40(X) 12/06/8~ 12/06/8V PEFXJI-COLA CI]{~k~¥ VEIl)OR TOTAL P4040 12/06/8~J) 12/06/89 PIll~EY BOMES INC ~ TOTAL P4060 12/06/89 12/06/89 POORE])A I)ISTRIBUTING CO UE{~)OR TDTAL P4090 12/06/89 12/06/89 POWER BP, A{<E E~U:mF..NT CO VENIM]R TOTAL R4200 12/06/~ 12/06/~ R L ¥~DA{~- {, ASSOCIATES VENI)OR TOTAL R420V 12/06/~ 12/06/~ RA,',q)Y'S S{q~iITATI~ VENI)DR TOTAL R422k) {?{DUNT ~gCRIPTI~ 66.50 NDV ELECTRICITY 457.35 NOd ELECTRICITY 329.36 NDV ELECTRICITY ~'~0.78 NDV ELECTRICITY 1,~7.8~ NDV ELECTRICITY 1,243.78 NOV ELECTRICITY 4,541.42 JRM.-CI) ~1.42 60.OO XW~q PARTY EXP 203.96 NDV WIG 203.96 ,JRN.-CD 203.96 444.B0 NOV MIX 444.B0 73.00 JikN.FEB POSTG MTR RE]~[ PPD 376.00 3,258.15 M]V I)EER 3,258.15 JR~-C~ 3258.15 8.48 FtASHE~ 41.46 LUG CAPS 49.~4 JRM.-CD 49. g4 70.00 gQ BOND--CLAFU< 70.00 70.00 73.00 JRM.-CD 73.00 5.50 ID CARD-~CKIM. EY 10.00 lB CARO-HYUV~,NICCIB 15.50 01-4340-3710 01-4320-3710 71-7100-3710 22-4170-3710 73-7300-3710 75-7800-3710 I010 01-4020-4100 1010 71-7100-~520 1010 71-7100-9540 1010 01-4320-3210 01-1285-0000 01-1285-0000 1010 71-7100-9530 lOlO 01-4280-LY310 1010 01-1285-0000 1010 01-4320-3750 1010 01-4140-4100 01-4140-4100 lOiO PRE-PAIO A~ PAGE 7 AP-C02-O1 RCIL~ITIFICATI~S R4~ RONALD MARSO~E R4L'x~o RON'S ICE COMPANY S4410 VENDOR TOTAL 12106/89. 12106189 VENDOR TOTAL 12/O6/89 12/06/89 VE~)OR TOTAL 12/06/89 121O6/89 ~ITH ~ATING & AIR S44~ STAR TRI BNJ~E S4571 VE'NI]OR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 VE]~DO~ TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 STERLING FENCE, INC. ~ TOT~ T4770 12106/89 12106/89 THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL T4780 12/06/89 12/06/89 THRIFTY SNYDER 1)RU{3 NO4 VENDOR TOTAL T4940 12/06/89 12/06/89 TRI-STATE PUMP & CONTROL I ~ TOTAL T4950 12/06/89 12/06/89 VENIK]R TOTAL TRIM])( ~ILITIES T4~O TWIN CITY HO"~E JUICE CD 12/06/89 12/06/89 VE)~'O~ TOTAL PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY DF MOUND AN]UNI' DESCRIPTION 15.50 20Q,O0 NOV ASST CHIEF SALARY 213.20 NOV ICE 213.20 Jiqi4. -CD 213.20 40.00 dRNL-CD 334.64 B~I)GET AD-STAR 334.64 d~l~L-CO 334.64 2,15.3.00 FENCE-PNU( AT WIL~IRE & IV 244.,50 FENCE-PARK AT #ILSHI~ & IV 2,~97.50 ~-CO 2397.50 32.15 FILM ~.15 dR~.-CO 32.15 337.32 SLEEVES 2,170.59 RE]~AIR PUMPS 2,507.91 JRI~.-CI) 2507.91 57.67 SWITChES,KNOBS 5~.67 ,J~m. -CI) 57.67 45.06 NOV MIX 45.06 dRI~.-CD 45.06 141.49 LABELS 22-4170-1370 1010 71-7100-95~0 1010 01-4290-3820 lOlO 01-40~-3510 1010 01-4399-4100 01-4399-4100 1010 71-7100-9530 1010 22-4170-22(X) I010 78-7800-2300 78-7800-3800 1010 01-4280-2310 1010 71-7100-9540 I010 71-7100-22(X) DATE !2, TI~ 14.c PRE-PAID A~DUNT CHECK PAGE $ P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L DATE 12/( AP-C02'01 CITY OF MOUNI) TIME 14.4 INVOICE DUE HOLI) INVOICE ~ DATE DATE STATUS 12/06/89 12/06/89 TWIN CITY PRICING & LABEL* VE}~)OR TOTAL U5100 12/0~/89 12/06/89 UNITOG RENTAL SYSTEM V~(]R TOTAL V51~ 12/06/89 12/06/89 V~{X{REN-H~ZN~D-STALI. INGS VB~]R TOTAL VFW CLUB 5113 12/06/q~ 12/06/89 VENIX3R TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 NAT'ER PRODUCTS COI"PANY VENDOR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 WESTONKA ~ OF ~ VE~ TOT~ 12/06/89 12/06/89 NESTI]NKA COI'I~UN~TY ~TN N* VENIX~ TOTAL ~STOM<A FOODS 12/06/89 12/06/89 VE){I)OR TOTAL 12/06/89 12/06/89 ESTDM<A SANITATI~ VEM)OR TOTAL 12/06/~ 12/06/~ 141.49 141.49 50,16 121.00 117.72 23.54 60.17 60.17 4.43 437.19 437.19 747.50 390.00 2,119.~0 3,257.40 402.10 402.10 ~02.10 2~0.73 Z~0.73 290.73 42.00 42.00 42.00 22%97 227.97 227,97 12.52 194.70 207.22 207.22 140.(X) 140.00 140.00 14,783,00 14,7~.00 DESCRIPTION JRNL-CI) ~ TDWELS NOV RUGS NOV ~IFORI'{S NOV ~IFORM9 NOV ~IFDRMS ~ UNIFDRMS NOV RAGS ~ -CD OCT PLAN CONSULT OCT Pt. AN CONSULT-PW STORAGE OCT PL~ CONSII. T-CUBG-COMPI~EH dR)IL-CD XMA9 P~TY EXP-VFW CD~-WC~ JtflL-CD COFF-EE, C~UEA~, ~ COFEE, C[E)K I ES, ETC -Cl)dmNC I L JRM,-CI) CD~-SR CENTER JRNL-CD I010 01-42~0-~."'?,.,0 78-7800-~"'00 01-4280-2240 01-42~0-2240 73-7300-2240 78-7800-2240 ~-4170-2230 1010 01-4190-3100 60-&000-3100 16-58~4-3100 1010 01-4020-4100 1010 73-73(X)-2300 I010 71-7100-22(X) 1010 16-588&-4100 1010 78-7800-2200 01-4020-2200 1010 01-4340-3750 1010 1&-5888-4100 1010 PRE-PAID CHE' ASOUNT I~E~! DA' PAGE 9 AP-C~-O1 VEM)OR INVOICE DUE HOLO NO, INVOICE {{~)R DATE DATE STATUS kESTOI~,A SO'IOOL DIST 277 VENDOR TOTAL 12/0~/8~ 12/0~/~ WLRST-P~-LARSON VENI~R TOTAL X~/50 12/~/~ 12/0~/8~ XEROX CORPORATII~ VENDOR TOTAL Z,~:~45 12/0~/89 12/06189 ALVIN OPITZ VE]~)(]R TOTAL Z6046 12/06/89 12/06/89 MICHAEL ~ VENDOR TOTAL Z6051 12/06/8~ 12/06/89 DA~II) BOU) VENDOR TOTAL Z6053 12/06/89 12/06/8~ STEVE ERICXSON ~ TOTAL Z6054 12/06/B9 12/06/89 DAVII) CARLSON VENDOR TOTAL Z6056 12/06/89 12/06/89 G;UEG PEDERSON VENDOR TOTAL Z6069 12/06/89 12/06/89 G~EG PALM VENDOR TOTAL Z6071 12/06/89 12/06/89 BRIAN ERI(](SON VENI)OR TOTAL Z6074 PURCHASE CITY OF AW]LWT 14783.00 1,550.00 3,435.00 51.72 5.05 56.77 13.65 100.00 100.00 100.00 DESCRIPTION I~EC RETAI~R 7-9 QTR - HRA JRNL-CD DEC PRINC-1012 OEC INT 1012 dR~.-CD OFFICER SALARY OFICER SALARY ,JRI~.-CD OFFICER SALAR) dRN.-CD OFICER SALARY dRY[ -Ci) DFICER SALARY dRNL-CD OFFICER SALARY ~--CD OFFICER SALARY dR~L-CI) OFFICER SALARY ~_-CD JOURNAL 01-4110-3100 64-5600-3100 1010 01-4320-5000 0i-4320-6110 1010 22-4170-1370 1010 22-4170-1370 I010 22-4170-1370 22-4170-4100 1010 22-4170-1370 lOlO 22-4170-1370 1010 22-4i70-1370 lOlO ~-4i70-1370 1010 22-4170-1370 iOlO 22-4170-1370 DATE 12, TIME 14.: PAGE 10 PURCHASE dOUR NA L DATE I2/ AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND TIME 14.: GREG ANDER~ Z6111 JERRY GARVAIS Z6112 CRAIG ~N[~D~SON ZM15 BRAI] LANDSMAN Z6118 JE~'RE¥ N~ERSEN Z~I30 BOB BOS~A INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE DATE STATUS 12/0~/~9 ~ TOTAL 12/0&/89 12/0~/89 VL~X~ TOTAL 12/0~/~9 12/~/~ ~ TOT~ 12/~/~ 12/~/~ ~ TOT~ 12/~/~ 121~/~ ~ T~ 12/0~/89 12/0~/89 VB~X~ TOT~ TOTAL Pll ~ AMOUNT DESCRIPTION .500.00 JR~k-CD 500.00 200.00 OFFICER SALARY 2~,00 OK~-CD 350,~ J~.-CD 2(X).O0 DFFICER SALARY 200.00 JRNL-CD 2(X).~ DFFICER SALARY 200.00 JRNL-CD 25.00 CAR FOR MCI 25.00 JRNL-CD I010 22-4170-1370 I010 22-~170-1370 1010 22-~170-1370 1010 22-4170-1370 1010 22-~170-~100 1010 PRE-PAID AMOUNT CITY of MOUND December 7,1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator November's Recycling About every other week I need to deliver containers to about 6 homes. I think this will be a never ending thing. The pickup are going very smoothly, very few calls about misses. In yesterdays paper, Dec. 6, Hennepin County Board decided to postpone for two months a decision of creating a processing center. On Monday, Dec. 11,I have another meeting in St. Louis Park with Hennepin County Staff, we'll see what they have to say this time. November's recycling 44.70 tons, 2365 households (37.5%) CITY of MOUND ~6!2t ,t, 72 December 7, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Water Supt. November's Activity Report WATER DEPT. In November we pumped 21,782,OOO gallons of water. We had 1 watermain break. In November we had 5 T-off for non-payment, all were turned back on. We re-checked the houses that have been off for awhile to insure that there was no one occupying the house, all were still vacant. Things went better in November, no major breakdowns or problems. We took delivery of our new (used) 1976 Ford Dump truck. This replaces the 1975 Chevy, this truck had the engine blew up along with many other problems. Pat and myself attended a one day school on fire hydrants and gate valves. SEWER DEPT. The Sewer Dept. started their preventive maintenance on the lift stations this month. This consists of Gate valve operations, panel checks, pump and compressor inspections, etc. 3' 17 CITY of MOL?ND December 7, 1989 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist biechanic SUBJECT: November's Shop Report Even with this years light snowfall so far three of our main plow trucks have already required major repairs. Unit 8, 1985 L8OOO Ford had to have the clutch replaced, Unit 13, 1978 Chev. C-65 needed 1st and reverse gears replaced in the trans- mission, Unit 6, 1981 Ford L80OO required extensive plow repair due to contact with a manhole cover during plowing. The Water Dept. replaced Unit 16 a 1975, C-65 Chev. single axe1 dump. It was determined after the engine blew up that it would not be worth it to fix due to the many other repairs the truck also needed. It was replaced by a Ford L8OOO which was a trade-in by the State of Minnesota. We replaced the box and then set it up for our use on watermain breaks. In other repairs and service, we made a cab and installed a heater in the bobcat loader for sidewalk cleaning and general winter work. MISC. REPAIRS Unit 3 87 Chev. PU - Batteries Unit 5 83 Ford Dump - service Unit 8 85 Ford Dump - service Unit 11 87 Chev. PU - service and tune up Unit 19 82 Chev. Car - service Unit 1 87 Chev. PU - service Unit 16 74 Ford Dump - 6 new tires 841 89 Pontiac Squad - new alternator, service 846 89 Pontiac Staff - service 844 88 Chev. Squad - Blown engine - warranty CITY of MOUND December 7, 1989 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Geno Hoff Street Supt. SUBJECT: November's Activity Report November is when we mix our salt sand for the winter. At the end of the month we had 2,224 tons in two stockpiles, we have the bin filled at the new shop and about 1OOO tons over at the Island Park garage. Last year we used 3000 tons, so I suppose we'll have to mix again. We started to put up our Christmas decorations the week of the 13th. We decorated 63 street lights and 34 trees, thats 150 strings of lights, 3,750 bulbs and 1,500 feet of extension cords. The Street Dept. was out plowing and sanding 5 times this month. We plowed 2 times, 2" and a 5" snow fall, the rest of the time we sanded. We've put down 70 loads or 560 tons of sand in November. We cleaned the sidewalks once. SIGN DEPT. We put up 8 new signs, 4 stop, 2 No Parking, 2 Neighborhood Crime Watch. We also took down the 2 Farmers Market signs. CEMETERY Staked out 3 graves and 4 markers. MEMORANDUM DATE: December 1, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff Jan Bertrand, Building Official November 1989 Monthly Report STAFFING During the month of November we had 19 working days and 3 holidays. Peggy James took 1/2 day of sick leave and 1/2 day of vacation. ! took 4 days of vacation during the month. There were two Planning Commission meetings during the month, on Novem- ber 13th and November 2?th. Peggy James attended both Planning Commission meetings and one Park Commission meeting on November 9th. I attended one Planning Commission meeting on November 13th and two City Council meetings. INSPECTIONS The following inspections were conducted during the month of November: Site Inspections 8 Footing Inspections 3 Framing Inspections 5 Insulation Inspections 4 Drywall Inspections 1 Final Inspections 39 Progress Inspections 13 Erosion/Grading Inspections 0 House Moving/Demolition l Heating Inspections 11 Plumbing Inspections 5 Fire Sprinklers/Fire Code 2 Complaints ~5 TOTAL 97 The above list does not include 33 inspections and I plan review made by the substitute inspector, electrical inspections, and in- spections completed by the Plumbing Inspector. November 1989 Monthly Report Planning & Inspections Page Two REPORTS AND PLAN REVIEWS There were 3 plan reviews completed during November. The monthly report for September was submitted to the City Manager. Reports were submitted to the Planning Commission, City Council, normal correspondence, and inspection notices. There were I3 nottees sent out during the month For exterior storage removal, building code corrections, Fire code, and/or zoning code enforcement. PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission forwarded one variance, one house moving, and a recommendation for public works materials storage to the City Council. The Planning Commission, at their workshop meeting on November 27th completed the Comprehensive Plan draft to for- ward to the City Council. Two new commissioners were interviewed and appointed to the Planning Commission; and a housing main- tenance report was submitted to the City Council, which in-turn directed staff to draft an ordinance with the Planning Commission For City Council review. LEGAL STATUS During November, one formal complaint was requested From the City Attorney to owners at 4552 Denbtgh Road. The City Attorney reviewed the status of several pending subdivision plats during the month. Two court trials were scheduled in November for 4891 Edgewater Drive and 6195 Sinclair Court. TRAINING/MEETINGS I attended one Planning Commission meeting, two City Council meetings, and the regular staff meeting during the month. I met with Jerry Babb, Fire Marshal, and the new State Fire Mar- shal regarding group and family day care and with derry regarding Uniform Fire Code Ordinance. I attended the building officials meeting in New Hope during November For a two day seminar conducted by the Minnesota State Building Code Division and a two day conference in Maplewood con- ducted by the international Conference of Building Officials (Whittier, CA). The topics discussed were handicap provisions, 1988 code plan review, pre manufactured housing, pending legisla- tion, revisions to the testing standards, etc. November 1989 Monthly Report Planning & Inspections Page Three I also met with a member of the V.F.W. to discuss remodeling, a tentative buyer of 2380 Commerce to discuss conversion of the home to a restaurant, and K & K Design to remodel 5293 Shoreline Blvd. to a Rapid Oil Change. CITY EQUIPMENT & PURCHASES The City vehicle required gasoline Fills during the month of November, winterizing, and speedometer cable replacement. STATISTICS OF ACTIVITIE~ The total number of building permits issued in the month of November was 10 with a total valuation of $173,624. The valua- tion figures are attached on the building activity report for November. in addition, Peggy has arranged appointments for the building and plun~Ding inspections. She has prepared the Planning Co~ission agenda and minutes, the Park Commission agenda and minutes, issued building, plumbing and heating permits, and typed cor- respondence for the Building OFFicial and Park Director. She has compiled month-end reports for building activities, Sewer Availability Charge, and U.S. Census Report. ' Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commis- sion requests and requirements, site inspections For Flood plain verification, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance notices, review status of various sites for the city prosecutor, preconstructlon meetings at the site for building permit applica- tions or realtors, Fire damage and periodic commercial inspection updates. '' The heating inspections during the construction of a project are included under the Framing and final inspection of the build- Ing. The heating installations mentioned are For separate equip- ment being placed in homes and businesses. DE)TE: Political Conservation: "I'm what you call a 'conservative liberal,'" said the aspiring politician, "i'm all For change, but you go First." NEW RE$1OENTtA~ CONSTRUCTION CITY OF NOUND .5341 Naywood Road Hound, NN '55364 mUILDIN(] ACll¥1TY REPOmT ~,~ NOVENBER -,~ 1989 TOCN Fem~y Uft~ NEW RESiDENTiAL N~ ~RESIDE~ 128,924 44,700 2,760,447 IqE~_IIDENT~AI, ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONE Tot~ No~-Retk~ntle! TOTAl. MONTH AND YEAR TO DATE CONYER$1ON$ 173,624 1,306,156 TOTAL CITY Of MOUND December 7, 1989 5341 MAYWO©D ROAD MOUND MINNES3TA 55364 0 2, 472-~'~55 TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager FROM: Fran Clark, City Clerk RE: November Monthly Report There were two regular City Council Meetings in November. There was agenda preparation, packets, minutes, and follow-up items from each meeting. Linda attended and prepared the agendas and minutes for both meetings as I was off for a personal emergency. I think she did a wonderful job. Linda planned and organized the City Christmas Party and although I was unable to attend I have heard it was a smashing success. The final touches were put on the public document containing pro- cedures for the City of Mound to follow in administering the Min- nesota Government Data Practices Act after receiving the City Attorney's recommendations. That document was submitted to you in November and approved. I continued to work on the Police Department Manual. fc CITY of MOUND 5341 MA'/'A OCZ MOUND December 6, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR NOVEMBER FINANCE REPORT 1990 BUDGET The seemingly never ending 1990 budget process has finally ended. It was very frustrating having to deal with the changes the governor and legislature came up with. Our first proposed tax levy resolution showed a proposed decrease in the City of Mound tax levy. The veto of the tax bill and the special session contained a significant shift of LGA from cities to schools. Our final City tax levy request was up 19%. The expenditure requests did not change from our first levy resolution to our final levy resolution. We have all heard that the shift in LGA from cities to schools should balance out for the taxpayer. I will let you know if this is the case once all of the taxing districts have submitted their levies to the county, due by December 28. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DEBT SERVICE FUND The process of calling in the remaining bonds in the Capital Improvements Debt Service Fund began in November. This process has been recently completed by a number of cities including Minnetonka, Elk River and Shorewood. The city attorney has prepared the resolutions calling for redemption of the bonds and the publication of the notice for call of the bonds. I have contacted the paying agents and the original purchaser of the bonds of our intention to call in the bonds. If the resolutions are approved, all bonds will be retired by March 1, 1990 in the Capital Improvements Debt Service Fund. The remaining balance in the fund (approximately $1,700,000) would be available at the discretion of the City Council. INVESTMENTS Balance 11 -1-89 Bought: Tr Receipts 8.15 CP 8.48 CP 8.20 Due Due Due 11-15-90 2- 6-90 5- 7-90 Dain Dain Marquette $8,467,696 187,908 279,145 403,388 Matured: CD 8.81 cP 8.30 CD 9.3O CP 9.30 Marquette American Dain Dain (375,133) (146,692) (188,048) (241~R1~) Balance 11-30-89 $8,386,951 JN:ls MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT ,77_/~7,/ ~ THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR MONTlt OF ~ MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE mo. OF CALLS WOUND - FIRE EMERGENCY ~'TO,~ ~EACH - F;RE EMERGENCY MI~ETRISTA - FIRE EMERGENCY o~o.o - EMERGENCY SHOR~OOD - FI~E EMERGENCY SPRING PARK - FIRE EHERGENCY RUTUAL AID FIRE EHERGENCY TOTAL FIRE CALLS TOTAL E~ERGENCY CALLS CO~ERICAL RESIOENTIAL INDUSTRIAL ~s ~ ~SCg~CAN~OUS ~UTO F~LSE ALARH* NO. OF HOU.S - ~OU~O F~ - ~T~ BCH FiRE E~E~ENC~ TOTAL -~'r.~STA F~R~ E~E~ENC~ TOTAL - OROHO FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - SHOREWOOD FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL -SP. PARZ FiRE EMErgEnCY TOTAC -MUTUAL AID FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL ~C~t D~CL HOURS T.,~. E~ERGE[ICY HOURS T~T~. FIRE & EMERGENCY HOURS FIRE DEPAAIVZNT FOR NOh~I~ OF DRILLS & gAINTEIIA/~CE FI1RE & P,~CUE ~IRE FIGHTERS ~AG~, WAG~ H~ ~ WAG~ A. OP~TZ /' / ~ /f~ ~ ~ 6.00 //q- 6.00 3?Jo MQUND VOLUNTEER FIRE. ~ MOUND, MINNESOTA DRILL Date://- ~ C~, ~ ~/~ Time Discipline and Teamwork Critique of Fires Pre-Plaining and Inspections Tools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films First Aid and Rescue Operation Use of Self-Contained Masks REPORT Pumper Operation Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzle & Hose Alliance Inhalator Operation Time Note: Hourse Training .Paid ~ Excused ~ Unexcused Q Present, Not paid Df~ J. Andersen ~-.G. Anderson J. Babb C. Baker J. Beauchamp ~1/~_ D. Boyd ~ D. Bryce ~ S. Bryce ~1/~. D. Carlson -~t1~ j. Casey ]~.S. Collins ~M. David _~1/~ B. Erickson ~ S. Erickson t~p. Fisk J. Garvais K. Grady p. Henry C, _~ Henderson _~/ ~. Johnson Landsman Ri Marschke J. Nafus B. Niccum ~//~ M. Nelson ~A A. Opitz ~ G. Palm ~ M. Palm T. Palm _ G. Pederson .~ T. Rasmussen M. Savage R. Stallman ~/~ T. Swenson W . Swenson R. Williams ~ T. Williams / ~r~l lmaster / MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA Date: //-/~ - DRILL REPORT Discipline and Teamwork Critique of Fires Pre-Plaining and Inspections Tools & Apparatus Identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films First Aid and Rescue Operation Use of Self-Contained Masks Time Pumper Operation Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural & Propane Gas talk & Demonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzle & Hose Alliance Inhalator Operation Time Note: Hourse Training.Paid ~ Excused [ Unexcused Q Present, Not paid ~l/~_ j. Andersen ~' G. Anderson ~U~j. Babb J. Beauchamp D. Boyd ~D. Bryce _~ S. BrTce D. Carlson ~-~- J. Casey S. Collins ~ ~-"M. David %~/~ B. Erickson ~'/~ S. Erickson ~'~- P. Fisk -~TD- J. Garvais '~'f~ K. Grady P. Henry C. Henderson G. Johnson ~z~ B. Landsman R. Marschke J. Nafus ~'/d- B. Niccum ~;/~- M. Nelson ~'</- A. Opitz _~G. Palm M Palm _~ T. Palm A~ - G. Pederson '~ T. Rasmussen ~ M. Savage R. Stallman D"- T. Swenson ~ W. Swenson D ~ R. Williams ~U~-T. Williams Dri114~ster 3 3z CITY of MOUND 534! MAYWOOD ROoD MC:LiND MINNESOTA ~6,12} 472-t* ES December 6, 1989 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER~--A~=~ NOVEMBER 1989 REPORT With one more month to go this year, we are $12,000 ahead of last year's pace. It's pretty early to tell but the forecast for December, in my opinion, should equal last year's December sales or do slightly better. Based on this we should end up around $15,000 over 1988. This is unbelievably close to the projection of doing $20,000 more in sales that John Norman and I came up with in March. The day before Thanksgiving was its usual hectic busy self. People are notorious and very predictable in doing their shopping for other things and leaving the liquor store shopping until the last possible minute. Gross sales for the day were just over $9,000. The week before Thanksgiving, in keeping up with the Jones', we prepared the store for Christmas. Not quite as early as the malls, but early enough as far as I am concerned. We have our Christmas decorations up and our gift selections available and are ready for the big offensive onslaught. JK:ls ()f NOVENBER 1989 MONTHLY REPOCT~/) PARK DEPARTNENT Parks Again this winter there will be four ice rinks, one each at Philbrook Park, Three Points Park, Doone Park, and Highland Park. These rinks will be dependent on the weather. First we need snow so we can build a berm to hold in the water, then we need sub- Freezing weather to flood for an ice surface. So far, the weather has not cooperated. Commons Docks We are working on four dredge sites, Waterside Lane, Emerald, Carlson Park, and Ridgewood Park. Ail applications For permits have been sent to the DNR and Watershed. We will be bidding the work in late Oeeember 1989 and hope to see the work done in January or February of 1990. The number of dredges will be determined by how favorable the bids are. There is only one area on Three Points that we are looking to have rtprapped this win- ter, 240 lineal feet on Pebble Beach Comons. Also, we have been preparing the applications and information sheets For the 1990 dock season. These mailings will go out on December 29, 1989. Cemetery The two signs ¢or the cemetery are near completion. They were delivered, but they had Forgotten to put the divisions on them. We should have them soon, but will wait until Spring to install them. Trees We have had two tree complaints, both on city property. have been marked and are scheduled For removal soon. These LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Len Harrell Monthly Report for November, 1989 STATISTICS The police department responded to 709 calls for serv- ice during the month of November. There were 31 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 4 criminal sexual conduct, 2 aggravated assaults, 9 burglaries, and 16 larcenies. There were 49 Part II offenses reported. Those of- fenses included 5 child abuse/neglect, 10 criminal damage to property, 4 DWI's, 7 simple assaults, 6 domestics (3 with assaults), 8 harassment, 5 runaway, and 4 other offenses. The patrol division issued 106 adult citations and 7 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 39 citations. Warnings were issued to 59 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 2 adults and 2 juveniles arrested for felonies. Eight adults and 2 juveniles were arrested for misdemeanors. There were ten warrant arrests. The department assisted in 11 vehiclular accidents; There were 19 medical emergencies and 68 animal com- plaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 12 occasions in November and requested assistance 9 times. Property valued at $13,521 was stolen during the month. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER, 1989 II. III. IV. INVESTIGATION Investigators worked on 9 child protection cases and 10 criminal sexual conduct cases in November. Those cases combined accounted for 102 hours of investigative time. In addition, cases involving burglary, arson, nar- cotics, assault, theft, NSF checks, aggravated DWI, truancy, and patient maltreatment were investigated. There have been 53 child protection cases for the year. Formal complaints were issued for 1st degree burglary, receiving stolen property and theft, assaults, worth- less checks, gross misdemeanor DWI's, violation of an order for protection, and erosion control. Investigator Grand spent 61 hours in the schools in November. The D.A.R.E. program is being presented at Grandview Middle School and Our Lady of the Lake. Safety issues and "Officer Friendly" presentations are being made at Shirley Hills Elementary. Personnel/Staffing The department used 149 hours of over-time during the month of November. One officer was "injured on duty" and missed 8 days with a leg injury. There were 5 days of sick time used. These 13 illness days greatly con- tributed to the over-time as well as several court cases heard in November. Officers also used 22 days of holiday time and 14 days of vacation. Officers earned 14 hours of comp-time and used 27.5 hours of comp-time. TRAINING Officers received 10.5 days of training during the month. The training included intoxilyzer training, defensive tactics, emergency medical refresher and the D.A.R.E. program. 3731, MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER, 1989 Ve The department got together with the fire department and held a mass casualty exercise. The exercise in- cluded several other departments and was a very good learning experience. Reserves The police reserves donated a total of 178.5 hours to the department and community in November. The reserves were very helpful in assisting at the mass casualty in- cident and the Christmas Tree ceremony. The reserves were involved in a day long defensive tac- tics training in November. 3 OFFENSES REPORTED CLEARED UNFOUNDED EXCEPT. CLEARED 1989 CLEARED BY ARREST ARRESTED ADULT JUVENILE PART I CRIMES Hc~nicide 0 0 0 0 Criminal Sexual Conduct 4 0 2 0 Robbery 0 0 0 0 Aggravated AssauLt 2 0 0 0 BurgLary 9 0 0 1 Larceny 16 1 4 VehicLe Theft 0 0 0 0 Arso~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 31 1 6 2 2 PART !I CRIMES Chi id Abuse/NegLect 5 0 1 0 0 Forgery/NSF Checks 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Damage to Property 10 0 2 0 0 ~apens 0 0 0 0 0 Ha rcot J cs 0 0 0 0 0 L Jquor Laws 0 0 0 0 0 I:)~l 4 0 0 4 4 SimpLe AssauLt 7 1 4 1 1 Dom~st ic Assau[t 3 0 0 2 3 Domestic (No Assault) 3 0 0 0 0 Harassment 8 1 1 0 0 Runaway/I ncorr igibi L i ty/Truancy 5 0 1 2 0 Pubt ic Peace 1 0 1 0 0 Trespassing 1 0 1 0 0 AIL Other Offenses 2 0 1 0 0 TOTAL 49 2 12 9 8 PART Ill & PART IV Property Damage Accidents 11 Personal Injury Accidents 0 Fatal Accidents 0 I~edicaJs 19 Animal CompLaints 68 Nut~t Aid 12 Other Ger~raL Investigations 512 TOTAL 622 Her~epin County ChiLd Protection 7 CHIPS 0 TOTAL 709 18 11 10 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT NOVEMBER, 1989 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE Hazardous Citations 69 Non-Hazardous Citations 36 Hazardous Warnings 9 Non-Hazardous Warnings 40 Verbal Warnings 76 Parking Citations 39 DWI 4 Over .10 2 Property Damage Accidents 9 Personal Injury Accidents 0 Fatal Accidents 0 Adult Felony Arrests 2 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 15 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 2 Juvenile Felony Arrests 2 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 3 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 0 Part I Offenses 31 Part II Offenses 49 Medicals 13 Animmal Complaints 68 Other Public Contacts 512 1,364 341 133 316 1,275 548 57 32 91 27 0 44 305 76 33 65 30 310 607 263 1,026 6,284 LAST YEAR TO DATE 1,278 594 309 614 1,335 538 83 49 106 3O 0 34 284 91 74 102 57 320 795 240 1,033 6,119 TOTAL 981 Assists 29 Follow-Ups 22 Henn. County Child Protection 7 Mutual Aid Given 12 Mutual Aid Requested 9 13,227 632 279 52 195 92 14 , 135 643 545 57 MONTHLY PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMMARY NOVEMBERt 1989 STOLEN Bikes Snowmobiles Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. Jewelry & Precious Metals Guns Home Furnishings Radio & Electronic Equipment Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment Miscellaneous TOTAL $ 0 0 0 289 1,184 2,532 0 0 1,106 100 8,310 $13,521 RECOVERED $ 8O 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 270 0 0 $ 382 1 CITATIONS DWI More than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired, or No Plates Illegal Passing Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Derelict Autos Seat Belt MV/ATV Miscellaneous Tags TOTAL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER, 1989 ADULT 4 2 0 3 0 43 7 2 23 0 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 39 4 0 0 10 0 ! 145 JUV 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER, 1989 WARNINGS NO Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Miscellaneous TOTAL ARRESTS Warrant Arrests ADULT 25 9 17 0 0 0 0 0 5 56 10 JUV 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 MOUND POLICE RESERVES MONTHLY HOURS NOVEMBER, 1989 BADGE # 5 6 11 10 14 16 17 19 22 23 57 12 28 56 13 58 DETAILS EMER RES. COMM H/F C/O SQUAD SERV BALL 2.0 - 3.0 - 2.5 - 2.0 5.5 2.0 3.0 2.5 6.0 6.5 TRAIN lNG 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.0 3.0 11 0 4 0 3 0 11 0 11 0 8 0 INSTR TION RIDE ALONG 6.0 16.5 25.5 o 7.5 ADMIN 20.0 .5 MEET ING TOTAL 32.5 0 21.0 7.5 5.5 41 .0 o 11.0 5 1 31 .0 8.0 TOTAL 10.5 12.0 6.5 6.0 67.5 0 55.5 20.5 0 178.5 MONTHLY ACTIVITIES Defensive Tactics & Training Mass Casualty Training Transports Reserve Squad Transports Christmas Tree Lighting R5 Nelson R6 Niccum RIO Suanson Rll Romain R12 Shell R57 Fox, d R58 Urbanski R16 Hawks R22 Fleming R23 Vogel R28 Geyen R58 Fox, K R13 Larson R14 Zuccaro Submitted by Sgt. Ne[son #RS DN/sh MOUND POLICE RESERVES SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS NOVEMBER, 1989 OFFICER DEPOSIT Butch Hauks $ 6.50 (CREDIT FROM SEPTEMBER) Ruth Vogel 0 Steve Kohman 0 Sherry Zuccaro 0 Oave NeLson 0 dohn Romain 0 deff FLeming 6.50 Makiko Swanson 0 Tom Geyen 6.50 dim Fox 0 Damion SheLL 0 TOTALS $ 19.50 BALANCE S369.00 472 50 104 O0 117 O0 213 SO 129 50 52 O0 6 50 13 O0 13 O0 13.00 S1503.00 $277.50 was paid to Dan Niccum in November for severence pay. Prepared by David NeLson ON/sh RUN: 5-0EC-89 CFS03 PRIHARY ISN~S ONLY? ACTIVITY CODES: NO ALL ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09000 SPEEDING 09001 J-SPEEDING 09002 NO D/L~ EXPIRED D/L 0900/* RESTRICTED D/L 09005 J-RESTRICTED D/L 09010 BAC OVER .10 09014 STOP SIGN 09018 EQUIPHENT VIOLATION 09030 CROSSMALK VIOLATION 090&O NO SEATBELT 09050 ALLC~ING INCC~PETENT TO DRIVE 09100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 09140 MO PARKING/MINTER HOURS 09150 NO TRAILER PARKING 09200 DAS/DAR/DAC 09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED 09220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF 09301 LOST PERSONS 09311 FOUND PERSONS 09312 FOUND ANIHALS/IMPOUNDS 09313 FOUND PROPERTY 0931& FOUND VENICLES/IHPOUNDED 09450 PROPERTY DAHAGE ACCIDENTS INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 10/26/89 THRU 11/25/89 ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 8 11 2 1 1 1 2 2 10 1 12 3 9 1 3 2 I 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 13 1 9 2 1 2 1 11 3 1 1 1 5 1 1 2 1 PAGE TOTAL 43 6 7 2 1 2 2 2 10 1 5 33 1 3 23 1 3 1 13 5 3 7 CFS03 $-DEC-89 IY iSN~$ ONLY? NO 'IVITY CODES: ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTHENT E N F 0 R S CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 10/26/89 THRU 11/25/89 ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 09451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. 09452 H & R ACCIDENTS W/TICKET 09561 DOG BITE 09565 DOG AT LARGE 09730 NEDICALS 09731 DETOX-MEDICALS 09801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT 09802 PUBLIC ASSIST 09900 ALL HCCP CASES OPEN DOOR/ALARMS HANDGUN APPLICATION 09943 PRC~LER 09944 UNWANTED GUEST 09945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 09950 INTELLIGENCE 09980 WARRANTS 0<~2 MUTUAL AID/8100 0~<~3 MUTUAL AID/6500 09994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER A0016 ASLT-UNK DEGREE-UNK ACT-POS FIREARM-CHLO-STR A5351 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HAHDS*ADLT-FAM A5352 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ A5354 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM 4 3 4 1 4 1 2 2 PAGE TOTAL 2 2 1 1 14 5 3 1 7 2 ? 1 1 2 2 10 6 2 1 1 3 RUN: 5-DEC-89 CFS03 PRIHARY ISN~S OgLY? ACTIVITY CODES: NO ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 10/26/89 THRU 11/25/89 ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION A5355 A5357 A5531 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-POLICE ASLT S-THRT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM Bl160 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT B3364 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-¢ON THEFT B3~94 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT B3764 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COI'I THEFT B37X~& BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT 83894 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COI4 THEFT B4090 BURG &-AT FRC NRES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 84990 BURG &-AT FRC RES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 13060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILO J2500 TRAFFIC-G~t-DRIVE UNOER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J2700 TRAF-ACCID-G~-AGGRAVATEO VIOLATION J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR L1217 CSC 1-FEAR GRT BOO HRM-SPOUSE-18 OLDER-F L3651 CSC 2-ACCOMPLIC FRC COER-POS AUTH-UNDER 13-F LSOZT' CSC 3-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-18 OLDER-F L?OZ2 CSC &-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-M M3003 JUVENILE-NABITUAL TRUANT M5350 RUNAWAY M8001 MISTREATMENT-PERSONS-RESIDENTS'PATIENT CONFINE N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 ?0 80 90 1 1 PAGE TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RUN: 5-DEC-89 CFSO~ RY IS#~S ONLY? TIVITY CODES: NO ALL ACT COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION T4151 T~159 U3286 N3190 DISTURB PEACE-NS-HARRASSING COt4IeJNICATIONS 03882 OIISENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT P3110 PROP DANAGE-NS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3120 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT P3130 PROP DAHAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT P3310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT T2021 THEFT-S251-S2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-MONEY T20~ THEFT-S251-$2500-FE-FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP T4021 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY TNEFT'$250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP TNEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP THEFT-S250 LESS'MS'FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-HONEY THEFT-$2SO LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP TNEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-$250 LESS INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 10/26/89 THRU 11/25/89 ........... PATROL AREAS ........... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 2 1 2 1 1 I 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 PAGE TOTAL 6 2 ? 2 1 1 2 3 1 3 2 1 3 1 REPORT TOTALS: 58 39 92 45 ~ 2 6 4 3 326 RUN: 1-DEC-89 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OFF01 PRIMARY iSN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DISPOSITION COOES: ALL ACTIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSIT]ON GRIO: ALL 10/26/89 THRU 11/25/89 / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENOING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEAREO CLEAREO A0016 1 ASLT-UNK DEGREE-UNK ACT-POS FIREARM-CHLD-STR A5351 3 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM A5352 1 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ AS35& 3 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLO-FAM A5355 4 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ A5531 1 ASLT S-THRT BOOILY HARM-KNiFE ETC-ADLT-FAM Bl160 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-U-UNK ~/EAP-UNK ACT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 B3364 1 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK I~EAP-COM THEFT B3494 1 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~JEAP-COM THEFT B376~ -- 1 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT 837'94 2 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-CON THEFT B389& 1 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK I~EAP-COM THEFT B4090 BURG &-AT FRC NRES-U-UNK IdEAP-UNK ACT 0 3 1 2 0 0 2 66.6 84990 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK W~AP-UNK ACT 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1306O CRIN AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3 0 4 0 1 0 3 4 100.0 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100. 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 RUN: 1-DEC'89 INSTALLATION NAHE -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE OFF01 * * * * * * PRIHARY ISH~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S ITION COOES: ALL COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION SR]D: ALL 10/26/89 THRU 11/25/89 / ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. / ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPT[ON CLEARED CLEARED J2SO0 1 TRAFFIC-GH-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 0 I 0 I 0 0 1 100.0 J2700 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0 TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION J3500 1 TRAF-ACC[D-HS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF L[QUOR L1217 1 CSC 1-FEAR GRT BOO HRM-SPOUSE-18 OLDER-F L3651 1 CSC 2-ACCCX, tPLIC FRC CC)ER-POS AUTH-UNDER 13-F 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 L5077 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 CSC 3-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-18 OLDER'F ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-N 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 M3003 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT M5350 4 0 4 2 0 1 1 2 50.0 RUNAUAY M8001 1 MISTREATMENT-PERSONS-RESIDENTS-PATIENT CONFINE 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 N3030 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 5 ~ 0 0 1 1 20.0 N3190 6 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 03882 OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 P3110 7 0 7 6 0 0 1 1 1~.2 PROP DA~AGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3120 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 PROP DAJqAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK iNTENT 9.5"o RUN: 1-DEC-89 INSTALLATION NAME -- I, KXJND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 OFF01 PR[MARY ISN~S ONLY? NO DISPOSITION COOES: ALL ACTIVITY COOES: ALL GRID: ALL ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ENFORS OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION 10/26/89 THRU 11/:~5/89 / ................ OFFENSES CI'EARED ................. ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING AOULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED P3130 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT 1 0 I 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 P3310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 T2021 2 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-MONEY T2029 3 THEFT-S251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP T&021 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 T4059 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 50.0 I 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 3 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3 TG099 2 THEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP T~151 1 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY T~159 3 THEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP U3286 THEFT-~S-SHOPLIFTING-$250 LESS 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 50 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 REPOI~T TOTALS - 7& 3 71 42 8 3 18 29 40.8 -: - LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS JoEIlen L. Hurt, Chair Orono Thomas Reese, Vice Chair Mound Jan Boswinkel, Secretary ainnetonka Beach Mark Westlund, Treasurer Wayzata Marvin Bjorlin Tonka Bay David Cochran Greenwood Albert O. Foster Deephaven James N. Grathwol Excelsior Eon Kraemer Spring Park John Lewman Minnetrista John G. Malinka Victoria Robert K. Pillsbury Minnetonka Robert Rascop Shorewood Robert E. Slocum Woodland TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: DECEMBER 7, 1989 FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECT: DECEMBER REPORT - LMCD 1. GENERAL INTEREST ITEMS 1.1 Eurasion Watermilfoil Task Force Thc maintenance work on thc harvesters is completed. They are presently covered and stored for the winter at the Spring Park Hcnncpin County Maintenance garage yard. Planning is proceeding on the 1990 program. We are looking at using barges to interface with the cutters at the cutting site, and transport the weeds to shore. Bids will be solicited for this work to sec if it can be made competitive with total handling with the cutters. With the anticipated still lower water levels next year, off loading the harvesters themselves at shore sites may be severely limited. We are looking into operating the cutting ourselves, without the use of a contractor. We arc presently seeking a Project Manager who would oversee thc entire operation taking over many of the things that Gene Strommcn and I did last year. With Gene's necessary involvement in thc lake comprehensive plan, and my own work assignments in 5 different states, we need this kind of assistance. The $85M requested of Hcnncpin County did not get into their budget. Tad Jude says that he might still get it out of contingency funds in March. The $30M requested from DNR out of thc $250M grant from thc legislature for EWM and Purple Loosetrife we have yet to sec. Thus far we are 0 for 2 in higher governmental body financial assistance. Thc Corps of Engineers are still telling us that there is an excellent chance that we will get the matching funds from them. Trouble is, our match is disappearing. The financial troubles of Hcilcman Brewery do not bode well for thc Freshwater Foundation's getting the 10¢ per case promised. 1.2. Comnrehensive Lake Mnnn~ement Plan 68 persons attended an all day session December 2 for stakeholders. The first 7 technical sections of the plan were presented, and were received with a minimum of dissension. The remaining three sections: Institutional, Intergovernmental Relations and Funding provide the potential for more differences of opinion. The anticipated $100M study grant from DNR has turned into $40M, plus fees for assisting the 14 cities in implementing the Shoreland ordinances. The LMCD has been asked to take the Icad agency role in thc establishment of these ordinances in all the shore cities. Since the implementation at 14 locations will involve much work, consulting will be involved which will rapidly spend the fee portion of the grant. 1.3 Other General Interest Items. Multiple Dock Moratorium. This draft ordinance passed out of thc dock committee with three dissenting votes, (mine included). It got to the full board on Wednesday night. I opposed it again because I fccl that with the low water thc point is moot and that the ordinance, which is bound to have high visibility sends the wrong message abroad: "We h~v9 our docks, now we don't want you to get yours." In reality, only a small number of boat slips would be involved. At thc board meeting it got tabled back to committee to get additional questions on wetlands and intent answered. Charter Boat Licensing. A sub commitee has been commissioned to look into thc rules for licensing charter boats. Thc number of boats has been growing to thc point where thc rather casual licensing rules of thc past probably no longer apply. I have been watching this closely, since it has a potential strong impact on Al and Alma's At issue are such items as: docking locations, passenger pick up and drop off points, tax shelter operators, signagc etc. .0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS - MOUND None Mound Representative Lake Minnctonka Conservation District LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, December 6, 1989 Tonka Bay City Hall 4901Manitou Road (County Road 19) 7:00 p.m. PUBLIC MF2kRINGS: 1. David Thomas Development, New Dock License 2. City of Wayzata Density and New Dock License 7:30 p.m. REGULAR MEETING: LMCD Board of Directors 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Reading of Minutes: 10-25-89 Regular Meeting 4. Public Comments - from persons in attendance not on agenda Reports A. Chair Cochran 1) Board member participation on Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force weed control position responsibilities involving * Operations vice chair -Marv Bjorlin * Funding vice chair - to be designated 2) MN DNR proposed LMCD-DNR Shoreland Contract and Comprehensive Management Plan funding, engaging LMCD to coordinate DNR Shoreland Rules, presentation by DNR Regional Hydrologist John Stine 3) Additional announcements Bo Financial Reports, Treasurer Lewman 1) Statement of Cash Transactions, month ending 10-31-89 2) Audit of vouchers for payment C. Standing Committees 1) WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE. Chair Grathwol b) Proposed Code amendment recommending an interim ordinance to restrict licensing, construction and maintenance of new commercial and multiple docks. c) City of Wayzata revised and combined new Multiple Dock License and Special Density Permit recommending approval of 15 additional slips to its Upper Marina subject to the outcome of the 12-6-89 public hearing. d) Inspection report recommending variance deposit refund for Rosenblum-Ulrich and new dock license deposit refund for Cardinal Cove Beach Association of $100 each plus $20 WSU adjustment for Cardinal Cove Beach Association. (continued) 37~ LMCD Board Agenda LAKEMINNE[ONKACONSERVATIONDIS'I'RICI' 12-6-89, Page 2 5. c. 1) e) Crystal Bay Service 1989 late dock license renewal recommending approval. f) Deicing applications for seventeen renewals, with one late renewal for Reid MacDonald, Minnetonka Beach, recommending approval. g) New deicing application for Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 2, recommending approval. 5. C. 2) EURASIAN WATER HILFOIL TASK FORCE - Chair Reese a) Proposed contract for barge service to seek bids for transporting weeds from the harvesters to shore as an option to weed harvester transport to shore, representing approximately one-half the season's weed harvesting transport needs to shore. b) Progress on equipment maintenance, planning for 1990. 5. C. 3) LAKE USE COMMITTEE, Chair Pillsbury a) Approval of minutes 11-29-89 b) Draft of Ordinance Relating to Registration of Charter Boats amending Sec. 3.07, Subd. 3 and 4, recommending approval with an addition at the end of Subd. 3 to include "and State of Minnesota inspections as may be required by law from time to time." c) Resolution 59 regarding fishing contest renewal application deadline recommended to be reaffirmed allowing applications to be submitted within 90 days of event date to avoid late penalty. d) Code Sec. 3.09, Subd. 5(b) recommended to be amended to agree with Resolution 59, permitting applications to be submitted 90 days in advance of the open-water fishing event to avoid the $50 late fee penalty. e) Letter to Brodie recommended to respond to concerns about silt build-up believed from boats passing through the channel near the Arcola Bridge. f) Letter to charter boat operators recommended to use the east-west channel for traffic from the Arcola Bridge to Lower Lake North except in emergencies. g) Recommendation that staff investigate the need for a possible Code revision to resolve the 5 vs 6 mph difference between DNR and LMCD regulations. 5. C. 4) ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Chair Rascop, Consultant Arndorfer a) Follow-up report on the 12-2-89 meeting. b) Progress report on Intergovernmental Relations/Funding Subcommittee meeting. 5, D. Executive Director's Report, Gene Strommen 1) Administrative priorities. 2) Preparations for annual review. Unfinished Business A. Comprehensive Management Plan/Shoretand Contract covered under chair;s report. New Business A. Designation of official newspaper. B. Summary of committee assignments to date. C. 1990 calendar review of Board, committee, and special activities. D. Additional new business suggested by the Board. ,~8. Adjournment 11-30-89 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m.,October 25, 1989 Minnetonka Community Center 1. Call to Order. Reese at ?:40 p.m. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair 2. Roll Call. Members present: Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; David Cochran, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; Douglas Babcock, Spring Park; John Lewman, Treasurer, Minnetrista; Thomas Martinson, Wayzata; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Thomas Reese, Vice Chair, Mound; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also present: David Arndorfer, Consultant; Sgt. Wm. Chandler, Sheriff's Water Patrol; Rob Merila, Consultant; Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Eugene Strommen; Executive Director. Members absent: Jan Boswinkel, Secretary, Minnetonka JoEllen Hurr, Chair, Orono; John Malinka, Victoria. Beach; 3. Reading of Minutes. Grathwol moved, Slocum approval of the minutes of the 9/2?/89 meeting as Motion carried unanimously. seconded, submitted. 4. Installation of Officers. Charles LeFevere administered the Oath of Office to David Cochran, Chair; Bert Foster, Vice Chair; and John Lewman, Treasurer. They were seated as newly installed officers of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. Cochran expressed his thanks to Reese and Hurr for the work they have done and the Board joined him in voting their thanks. Cochran stated he sees no major change in the mode of the Board's operation. Further, he continued, the Board has a tremendous job ahead of it and called on the members to accept responsibility for one or more of the tasks. He specifically mentioned the management study, each Board member assuring that their city understands the plan, and the continuing problem of eradicating or controlling Eurasian water Milfoil. 5. Public Comments. There were no comments attendance regarding items not on the agenda. from persons in 6. Reports A. Chair Cochran 1) Committee chair appointments - Cochran named the following to chair the respective committees: -continued LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 Grathwol. a) Water Structures and Environment Committee - b) Lake Use Committee - Robert Pillsbury c) Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force - Thomas Reese d) Advisory Committee - Robert Rascop e) "Save the Lake" Fund Campaign - Robert Pillsbury Cochran distributed a sign up sheet for members to indicate the committees on which they intend to serve. His hope is to get a cross section of members on each committee, adding that members are not required to serve on all committees. He did not appoint a chair for the Public Relations and Education Committee at this time. Cochran may conside{ activating a Steering Committee or Executive Committee. The Board concurred in the committee Chair appointments. 3) Rascop moved, Bjorlin November/December meeting schedule: seconded the following 11/08/89 - Advisory Committee, Management Plan 11/17/89 - EWM Task Force 11/18/89 - Water Structures and Environment Committee 11/27/89 - Lake Use Committee 11/30/89 - Intergovernmental/Funding Advisory Sub- Committee 12/02/89 - Management Plan Overview - Invited Public Officials 12/06/89 - Regular Meeting, Board of Directors 12/13/89 - Advisory Committee, Management Plan James Motion carried unanimously. 4) Additional Announcements - John Fisher, Minnetonka Men's Breakfast Club, has invited the Board to a meeting 10/27, 7:30 a.m. at the Wayzata Country Club to hear a presentation by Philip Jenni of the Citizens' League on Metropolitan Lake Managementl He will give an overview of that committee report, especially as it relates to Lake Minnetonka. The Executive Director has reviewed a draft of the report and finds it compatible with planning directions of the District. Agenda Amendment There being no objection from the Board it was agreed to amend the agenda by proceeding to item 7. A. 7. A. Unfinished Business Prosecution service review and report, Chair Cochran. Grathwol moved, Pillsbury seconded, the appointment of Steve Tallen as prosecuting attorney 2 LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 Tall n mubmi{%ed a le%ker ko khe Board sekking mpeei~ie procedures on lines of communication with the Board. He would submit quarterly reports, two in person in the spring and fall and two written at other times. The latter would be supplemented by meetings with the Executive Director, Chair or interested members. He also asked for a clarification of the authority of the Executive Director in dealing with prosecution matters. As an example he gave the problem in deciding whether to appeal a decision with short time limitations imposed by the Court and monthly Board meetings. Tallen suggested the Board grant the Executive Director interim authority for such circumstances. Cochran said this is a matter for the Board to take under advisement. Tallen further stated he will join Holmes and Gravens law firm effective 11/1 since the LeFevere-Leffler firm is being dissolved. This brings Tallen together with Charles LeFevere. Motion carried, Reese abstaining because he has enough time to review Tallen's outline. not had 6. B. Financial Reports, Treasurer Lewman 1) and 2) The Board received a statement of cash transactions for the month ending 9/30 and quarterly financial statement of July - September prepared by Duane Schibilla. They were accepted and ordered filed. 3) Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, payment of in the amount of $163,992.93, checks numbered 5689 through totaling $161,014.43 plus the following: 5745 5746 5?47 5748 5749 Business Consultants Seminar (Joan Mansk) Bank Wayzata FICA Commissioner of Revenue State Tax Small City Maintenance Co. Shop & Eq. Lease, EWM Dale's Contracting Eq. Transp. bills 5744 $49.00 1,566.50 286.00 600.00 477.00 The Atlas Marine Inc. contract has been fulfilled and payment for contract services have been paid. $20,000 continues to be withheld from United Marine International pending further speed tests on the weed harvesters. The manufacturer will install larger propellers which they think will bring the speed up to an acceptable 8 m.p.h. Motion carried, Pillsbury voting nay. LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 6. C. Standing Committees 1) EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL TASK FORCE, Chair Reese a) Reese prefaced a Resolution concerning the Board's re-commitment to a 1990 Eurasian Water Milfoil weed harvesting program. He spoke to the commitment necessary to carry out a successful program in 1990. The program for 1990 will require close coordination with the participating agencies starting with the Corps of Engineers, MN DNR, Hennepin County, Hennepin Parks, and Freshwater Foundation among the active participants. He cited three areas of responsibility detailed in the outline. Reese said he is willing to direct the agency involvement but he needs the assurance that the Board is 100% with the weed control program. Reese moved, Foster seconded, adoption of Resolution ~68 Regarding 1990 Eurasian water Milfoil Weed Control Program. Motion carried unanimously. equipment b) Contract for maintenance of weed harvesting Reese moved, Foster seconded, approval of an Contractor Agreement with Lance DeTrude to perform maintenance and repairs on District-owned weed equipment at $15.00 per hour and $9.00 per hour for assistant. Motion carried unanimously. Independent mechanical harvesting a mechanic c) Progress report by Contractor Merila Merila submitted a 30 day progress report on the program operation, data collection and review, equipment performance, his interfacing and participation with other agencies, plans for post-season activities and the preparation for 1990. He elaborated on several items, reporting that UMI is working on harvester ~4 by putting new propellers on it. They have also updated the other harvesters to conform to the ~4 machine. He indicated UMI had been very cooperative in updating. There was discussion on the use of a barge to haul the cut weeds from the harvesters to the trucks. Reese said this was considered when bids were taken originally. The bids for this system came in double. It is possible to look at barging again under different circumstances. 4 LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 Responding to a question from Bjorlin, Merila said warranty work continues and a record is being kept of the work done. It is %oo early %o predict wha% maintenance costs the District will have in the future. Reese reported the matching grant request has been forwarded to the Corps of Engineers and is being reviewed by their committee. The Executive Director reported the District will receive $30,000 from the MN Department of Natural Resources. He will meet with Commissioner Jude regarding the Hennepin County grant of $85,000. Grathwol suggested a report be made to the people who supported the public funding campaign, telling them of the progress that has been made. The Executive Director said this will be done as the year closes out and all information is available. Beth Whitaker, Minnetonka Boat Works, suggested this report accompany the next request for contributions to save on mailing costs. 6. C. 2) ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Chair Reese, Consultant Arndorfer. a) Preparations for the 12/2/89 meeting with public officials. Arndorfer stressed the importance of this meeting as it is the first opportunity to explain the management plan. Attendance by the Board members is extremely important and it is important that they contact their Mayors, Council Members and Administrators to assure their representation. Following this meeting there will be individual presentations to all fourteen mayors, council members and managers, regional agencies, followed by public hearings. There must be contact with the legislative delegations as well as past Chairs of the LMCD. Arndorfer plans to develop a peer review by a university or National Park Services specialist to review the plan. The last issue to be addressed is the future make up of the Board and funding of the plan. He estimates two to three times as much money will be needed as is being spent now. b) Arndorfer submitted a written status report of the subcommittees and major work areas as of October 23, 1989. c) Arndofer reported there is a budget surplus of approximately $5,000 because there was little Lake use monitoring due to the low water. He suggested transferring the funds continued LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 internally and use them for printing copies'of the plan to supply everyone attending the 12/2 meeting. An alternative would be to amend the contract and decrease it by the $5,000 and use other funds of the LMCD to do the printing. Rascop moved, Foster seconded, a budget transferring the excess funds in summer monitoring the management plan. Motion carried unanimously. adjustment to printing 6. C. 3) WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE, Chair Cochran a) Cochran moved, Bjorlin seconded, approval of the minutes of the 10/14/89 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. b) Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Minnetonka Boat Works, Orono. Cochran moved, Reese seconded, approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Minnetonka Boat Works, Orono for Browns Bay/Tanager Lake, for distribution as required by the Environmental Quality Board. Cochran noted the following changes made in the EAW since approval by the committee: Item 11, page 2 - to include the MN Department of Natural Resources as an agency from which a permit is required. Item 18 b page 3 - to indicate the subject is in a flood plain. Motion carried unanimously, noting there is a thirty day comment period after publication in the EQB MONITOR. c) David Thomas residential development, Smithtown Bay, City of Victoria. The Board received the committee recommendation for approval of a five-slip multiple dock for an outlot and three single-slip residential docks for a total of 8 BSU. Cochran moved, Bjorlin seconded, approval of the multiple dock license for the David Thomas residential development on Smithtown Bay, Victoria, all easements to be filed with the LMCD. Cochran advised the Board this will be concept approval only as there will have to be a public hearing prior to the December 6 Board meeting. Rascop stated he will vote nay on the motion because approval before a public hearing denies the purpose of the hearing. Brian Peterson, 6445 Baycliffe Drive, Victoria, spoke in opposition to the proposal. The location of the outlot which proposes to accommodate five boats is adjacent to the Richard Marx property. The outlot will create extra traffic along the continued $7&/ 6 LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989. lot llne to Marx's property. Peterson suggested outlot be located between properties in the development and not have an impact on neighboring property values and enjoyment. He estimates it will take a 92 foot dock to provide the five slips. Dick Marx, 6425 Baycliffe Drive, owner of the property adjacent to the outlot stated the 20' section leading to the lake is in close proximity to his master bedroom on the home he is building. Marx objects to the use of the outlot adjacent to his property. He believes a 92' dock would be a hazard to boat traffic. Ed Chalmers, 6435 Baycliffe Dr., has property between Peterson and Marx. If the dock is allowed it should be between lots within the development. It will be visible from his property, and he objects to the outlot as located. David Thomas, property owner, stated several attempts have been made to develop this property. He said it is possible to move the outlot but a location in the center of the development would require removal of several mature trees. Foster noted the request meets with all LMCD regulations but considering the strong neighborhood objections some agreement should be worked out between the parties. LeFevere stated that as this requires a public hearing the discussion being held might be premature as other parties may wish to be heard. Bjorlin withdrew his withdrew the motion. second to the motion and Cochran Tuck Thomas, the developer's son, said they are looking for direction as to whether the Board would be amenable to five vs. eight slips. LeFevere advised that in order to qualify this multiple dock license, all the shore line has to be considered as one site for the outlot. Where the outlot is located is not the consideration as much as where the dock is located and that could be any place on the entire shoreline. Cochran confirmed the public hearing for December 6th prior to the regular board meeting. Babcock requested more information from the City of Victoria. Thomas invited the members to view the property. The Executive Director reviewed the committee recommendation to participate with the MN DNR by serving as the lead agency in continued LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 the preparation of shoreland regulations. He proposed engaging an independent contractor as a technical advisor to work with him and the Chair. This should be done soon so the process could begin in early 1990. Cochran moved, Foster seconded, to approve LMCD participation as the lead agency in preparation of the MN DNR shoreland regulations and to authorize preparations to engage an independent contractor to prepare the technical aspects of a model shoreland ordinance for member cities. Motion carried unanimously. dock license. e) City of Wayzata inquiry for adding 15 slips to It was noted the inquiry was inappropriately tabled at the committee meeting and the staff recommends the tabling motion be rescinded. Grathwol moved, Cochran seconded, that the Water Structures Committee tabling of a City of Wayzata inquiry about adding 15 slips to their dock license be rescinded and Wayzata's inquiry be accepted for informational purposes until an actual application is received. Motion carried unanimously. f) Deposit refunds. Pillsbury moved, Reese seconded, approval of $100 deposit refunds for 1989 District Mooring Areas to City of Deephaven, City of Excelsior, Methodist Lakeside Assembly, Minnetonka Yacht Club and Wayzata Yacht Club. Motion carried unanimously. (It has been subsequently determined that the Minnetonka Yacht Club has LMCD attorney fees exceeding the $100 deposit, billing of which is being prepared.) 6. C. 4) LAK~ USE COMMITT~, Chair Pillsbury a) Pillsbury moved, Bjorlin seconded, approval of the 10/16/89 minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. b) Pillsbury reported the committee discussion of berthing charter boats in residential areas, the review of the charter boat application form, a request from James Brodie, Minnetonka Beach, regarding a silting problem at his property near the Arcola Channel, the personal watercraft progress report and preparation for the 10/25 public hearing and the winter rules relating to de-icing were for information purposes only. Sgt. Chandler reported one more BW! was issued for a total of 60 this season. c) Foster moved, Bjorlin seconded, approval of special event deposit refunds in the amount of $100 for the Don Shelby National Invitational Bass Tournament and the Viking Bass Masters' Tournament. Motion carried unanimously. 8 LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 8. D. FJ~CUTIV~ DII~CTOR'S R~PORT, Gene S~rommen 1) Strommen reported he has reviewed the executive director position description of April, 1986 and is developing an outline to better delineate the position based on current position responsibilities. He will cover priorities that are not being performed to the fullest capacity and prepare an assessment of how his time could be better used to benefit the district. 2) Administrative priorities. The Executive Director reported Muriel Stewart, Mound, has been employed as bookkeeper/clerk. She has an excellent background with a non- profit agency and has the skills important to the position's needs. Rob Merila is nearing completion of his second thirty days, a review to be conducted. Responding to a question from Rascop, the Executive Director reported all of Merila's time is currently being spent on milfoil, equipment maintenance and planning being the priorities. As that work lessens extra time will be directed to broader LMCD duties to assist the Executive Director, likely not until January. At that time one half of Merila's compensation is funded by LMCD operating funds. 7. Unfinished Business This agenda item on prosecution service was considered earlier in the meeting. 8. New Business A. Depository. Lewman moved, Reese seconded, Adoption of Resolution ~69, Designation of Bank Wayzata as Depository for LMCD Checking and Savings Accounts. Motion carried unanimously. B. Signatories. Treasurer Lewman recommended the executive director be added as a signator on LMCD checks with the Chair, Treasurer or one other officer, the Treasurer normally having primary officer signing responsibility. Rascop moved, Bjorlin seconded, to add the executive director as one of the signatures on LMCD checks along with the four officers. Motion carried unanimously. C. Additional new business. Reese requested an authorization to allocate up to $3,000 from the Save the Lake Reserve Fund to Hennepin County Lakes Improvement Section, in picking up lake rocks which are a hazard to boating, the result of a discussion with Section Supervisor Denis Bailey. Rascop moved, Foster seconded, approval of an expenditure of $3,000 from the Save the Lake Fund to fund Hennepin County's lake improvement program in removing hazardous rocks from the Lake. Motion carried unanimously. 9 LMCD Board of Directors - October 25, 1989 Reese asked members to advise the executive director of any hazardous rocks of which they have knowledge. Rascop asked for a report on where and how many are removed. (Subsequent to this meeting, it was determined by Hennepin County that they cannot apply LMCD funds to their contract. LMCD would have to negotiate its own contract With the lake buoys all being removed Oct. 30-Nov. 3, it would be very difficult to locate the rocks until next season, which Bailey so recommended.) 9. Adjournment There being no further declared the meeting adjourned at l0 p.m. business, Cochran David Cochran, Chair Jan Boswinkel, Secretary 10 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Resolution No. 68 1990 EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL WEED CONTROL PROGRAM WHEREAS the LMCD Board of Directors recognized the dominance of Eurasian water milfoil among Lake Minnetonka's aquatic plants in the fall of 1988; and WHEREAS it was further recognized that immediate action was necessary to prevent the uncontrolled spread of this noxious weed; and WHEREAS the LMCD Board approved a plan to conduct a lake-wide weed harvesting control program for the 1989 boating season; and WHEREAS the fundifig for this 1989 weed control program was fully supported by individuals, civic associations, area businesses and the 14 member cities of the LMCD; and WHEREAS the active regional and state agency participation in the Eurasian water milfoil task force has provided substantial in-kind support for 1989, and these same agencies are prepared to offer similar in-kind support for 1990, in addition to significant funding commitments; and WHEREAS media support of the program has recognized the value and purpose of the LMCD aquatic weed control program, enlisting positive public support through their consistent positive news coverage; and WHEREAS the investment in equipment has prepared the LMCD to proceed with a 1990 aquatic weed control program for the 1990 season; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the LMCD Board commit its full resources to the 1990 Eurasian weed control program, consisting of * fund reserves from the 1989 campaign; * enlistment of contractural services for both planning and executing a 1990 aquatic weed control program; * securing in-kind and funding support from stakeholding regional and state agencies, undertaking a supplemental private fund raising campaign under the auspices of the "Save the Lake" program; and * engaging the volunteer involvement of LMCD Board members in active support of the 1990 aquatic weed control program, undertaking or assisting in ar- ranging others to undertake leadership positions in support of this sustained long-term environmental Lake improvement program. ~,--A~d by day the of Lake~Minnetonka Conservation, 1989. District Board of Directors this David Cochran, Chairman Attest: Eug~e R. Strommen, Executive Director LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Action Report of: Meeting: Water Structures and Environment Committee 7:30 a.m., Saturday, November 18, 1989 LMCD Office, Wayzata Members present: James Grathwol, Chair, Excelsior; Boswinkel, Minnetonka Beach; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Babcock, Spring Park; John Lewman, Minnetrista; Thomas Mound; Thomas Martinson, Wayzata; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also present: David Arndorfer, Consultant; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order by Grathwol at 7:40 a.m. Jan Douglas Reese, 1. Study report on moratorium proposal Subsequent to the 10/14/89 meeting of the Water Structures Committee, a study group prepared a report on the draft ordinance proposing a moratorium on multiple docks, dated 11/7/89. It was distributed to the Committee. The recommendations to the Committee are as follows: 1. An ordinance change should be prepared to remove Type 3 and higher wetlands from any consideration toward shoreline footage requirement applicable to watercraft storage, provided a right-to access is protected. 2. Consider an ordinance which would prohibit docks which would create a condominium dock over the water. 3. The Water Structures and Environment Committee should consider amending the proposed interim ordinance to except land-zoned single family residential which must meet the 1:50 requirements for watercraft under the existing ordinance, provided wetlands of Type 3 and higher are not included in the computation of the lakeshore. 4. Require that the interim ordinance be terminated after three years. Arndorfer spoke to the purpose of the ordinance by reviewing the restrictive regulations for managing boat access and use as proposed in the Management Plan. He said statistics indicate the probability of reaching densities which will require restrictions being placed on access before the Management Plan is implemented. For example, a boat density of 6.5 acres/boat will be reached as the additional 350 watercraft are added by the LMCD commitment to the MN DNR for public access. DISCUSSION: Reese considered a moratorium a moot point because of water and questioned whether there were enough boats involved make it necessary. -continued low Grathwol's opinion is that currently development is slow and therefore this is an appropriate time to restrict additional multiple and commercial docks which will minimize hardships. Babcock noted his understanding additional slips were approved this year. would like to see the ordinance adopted. that approximately 100 With %hat in mind, he Foster favors the concept of transient docks being protected. Grathwol agreed. Arndorfer stated redevelopment of properties will increase boat density. existing improved Martinson wondered whether this action might encourage development. His belief is that development can be slowed in those areas that need it and is concerned about committing the Board's successors. Grathwol responded it will be necessary to prohibit applications, even for concept approval. MOTION: Rascop moved, Foster seconded, to recommend to the Board a moratorium on multiple dock applications with amendments to be drafted as follows: 1. To exempt applications on land-zoned single family residential which must meet the 1:50 requirements for watercraft under the existing ordinance, provided wetlands of Type 3 and higher are not included in the computation of the lakeshore. 2. To exempt transient docks. 3. To terminate two years after adoption and publication. Motion carried, Reese and Martinson voting nay. Slocum moved, bewman seconded, to recommend Section 2, Prohibition, Item 2.01 in the draft of the Interim Ordinance be amended to remove the language..."and no new docks making common use of adjacent dock use areas pursuant to LMCD Code Section 2.01, Subdivision 3," which in turn would also require an amendment to the Ordinance title, removing the language "and New Docks Making Common Use of Adjacent Dock Use Areas." The motion carried, Reese abstaining. Rascop was excused. Pillsbury left during the following agenda item. 2. City of Wayzata New Dock License and Special Density Permit applications for expansion in upper lagoon. Sonny Clark, City of Wayzata Park Superintendent, presented the application for a special density permit to increase the boat slips from 85 to 100 in the upper lagoon for a density of 1:21.5. - continued THe 1989 license inc].uded 8 slips at the Broadway Avenue docks, 4 at the depot and 85 in the marina. In addition to 16 amenities currently being provided, Wayzata will design and maintain a 40' sailboard launching area at the east end of the beach area, along with a set-up area. DISCUSSION; Babcock questioned the existence of two licenses for the city. Grathwol asked that the city provide figures as to the number of people served by the various dock and beach facilities. He noted Clark's information that they serve 10,000 people a year. Duane Markus, 405 Bushaway Road, Wayzata, commented that the amenities are terrific. MOTIONS: I. Reese moved, Boswinkel seconded, to recommend approval to the Board as one application subject to a December 6 Public Hearing. The Executive Director noted that standard procedure would be to hold the Public Hearing on December 6, summarize the results, and bring the item back to the Water Structures Committee at its January meeting for a recommendation for the Board's January meeting. Martinson questioned why the Committee cannot comment at the Public Hearing, avoiding delay. The Executive Director responded that the procedure provides for a written summary of the public hearing, include Findings from which the committee makes recommendations to the Board as its comment process. Questions of people speaking at public hearings are to be encouraged by members present. II. Babcock moved, Martinson seconded, an amendment to motion I to accept the application subject to the revision of the application to show it as one site, receipt of supplemental information, subject to the December 6 Public Hearing and return to the Committee for review in January. The Executive Director will review the information the Committee has received, place it in proper order, combine all of Wayzata's dock sites and applications into one application, re- view the amenities and provide it to the Board in advance of the Public Hearing with the revised application. He will consult with the LMCD attorney as to the procedure for the Board to act on the application at its December meeting following the Public Hearing. Grathwol ruled the motion (II above) to return the application to the Committee following the Public Hearing as a substitute for the motion (I above) to approve the application subject %o the Public Hearing. - continued VOTE Mo%ion ii - The motion failed, Reese, Martinson voting nay. Lewman, Boswinkel and Motion I - The motion carried, Babcock and Slocum voting nay. The Chair declared the city's application be revised forwarded to the Board prior to the 12/6/89 Public Hearing. and 3. Minnetonka Yacht Club/Lake Minnetonka Sailing School Order. The Executive Director reported the Order was approved by the Board on September 27th and the copy as revised was presented for information only. There were no further recommendations. 4. Inspection reports/refund: Rosenblum/Ulrich dock length variance (Carsons Bay, Deephaven). Reese moved, Boswinkel seconded, to recommend the refund of deposit for the Rosenblum/Ulrich dock length variance as all requirements have been met. Motion carried unanimously. 5. 1989 Dock License application Bay Service (late submittal). for approval: Crystal Lewman moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approval of the 1989 Dock License application for Crystal Bay Service, noting it was a late submittal. Motion carried unanimously. 6. Additional Business A. Cardinal Cove Beach Association (Refund) The Executive Director reported the Cardinal Cove Beach Association was a new dock license and slips in the dock dimensions were measured wrong. They are therefore entitled to a reduction of two WSU and are eligible for a $20.00 refund. Lewman moved, Reese seconded, a recommendation to the Board to refund $20.00 for the WSU adjustment and the $100.00 deposit. Motion carried unanimously. B. Multiple Dock License Fees (Low Water) The Executive Director reported that temporary low water is resulting in some dock license applications having fewer BSU. The Executive Director will advise applicants that applying for the lesser number could result in the need for a new license in the future if they once again wish to add the BSU's left out at this time. Grathwol asked that this be placed on a future agenda. pa C. Moorings Left in After November 15. Foster suggested the November 15 deadline could be changed to "after 4 inches of ice is formed". This is to be placed on the January agenda. D. Bean's Marina (Greenwood) Responding to a question from Babcock, the Executive Director stated the marina has not yet responded to the need for a variance application. Lewman was excused. E. Other. Martinson's question as to whether transient docks are an amenity or do they require additional amenities will be discussed in the future. Boswinkel left during the discussion. ENVIRONMENT District Mooring Area. Wayzata Yacht Club - Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Committee worksheet, The assessment season. Duane Yacht Club received a copy of the environmental considered discretionary for the coming Markus commented on $19 on the form noting Wayzata has dredged eight to ten days ago and the dredging will allow them to move back into the original area. He also stated the diagram is not the configuration in their application. The item was tabled subject to staff recommendation and con- sultation with the Environmental Quality Board. 2. 1989-1990 Deicing applications for approval Foster moved, Reese seconded, a recommendation that Board approve the following renewal applications to deice season: Curly's Minnetonka Marina Gayle's Marina Corp. Gray's Bay Resort & Marina Howard's Point Marina Maxwell Bay Marina Minnetonka Boat Works, Inc. Minnetonka Boat Works, Inc. Minnetonka Yacht Club (Wayzata) (Orono) the this North Shore Drive Marina Paul Resberg Rockvan Boat Yards, Inc. Smith's Bay Marina Tonka Bay Marina Rodney Wallace Wayzata, City of Wayzata Yacht Club James Wyer (Site 1) Motion carried unanimously. Foster moved, Martinson seconded, to approval of the following new application: Wayzata (Site 2). recommend Yacht Club Babcock asked to see ~he application and was given information as to %he location. He was informed a Public Hearing is not required for a new application but the Board has to approve. Motion carried unanimously. 3. EWM Update A. Equipment maintenance update. Reese reported harvesters ~3 and ~4 are in the County maintenance lot, Spring Park, and ~1 and ~2 are in the repair shop. B. Exploration for barge transport, harvester to shore. Reese said the option of self-operating is being explored for the 1990 season. Recommendations will be brought to the January meeting. They are also looking at the possibility of off-loading weeds to a barge as an alternative for two of the four harvesters. A bid for this alternate is now being prepared. Other. Reese said the Corps of Engineers representative is optimistic about LMCD receiving the funding providing Congress does not get cuts imposed to the Corps of Engineers budget by the Gramm-Rudman Act. A letter has been sent to County Commissioner Tad Jude regarding their funding of $85,000. The cities are in support of the LMCD weed control program. Reese reported Hennepin County Parks is considering the manner in which LMCD will engage their weed harvester next year. Adjournment. There being no further business to come before committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 a.m. the FOR THE COMMITTEE: Eugene S. Strommen Executive Director James N. Grathwol, Chair LAKE MiNNETONKA GONSERYATION DiSTRiGT Action Report: Lake Use Committee Meeting: 4:30 p.m., Monday,November 27, 1989 LMCD Office, Wayzata Members present: Robert Pillsbury, Chair, Minnetonka; Douglas Babcock, Spring Park; Bert Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Thomas Reese, Mound. Also present: Lt. Larry Peterson, Sheriff's Water Patrol; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order by Chair Pillsbury at 4:30 p.m. 1. Charter boat Code amendment The committee received a proposed amendment to the ordinance relating to the registration of charter boats which would (a) change the application date from May 1 to March 1, and (b) compliance with DNR and Water Patrol inspections, as adopted by the Board 9/27/89. Babcock explained the application date was changed to allow time to accomplish the inspections before the start of the season. This applies to renewals only and has a penalty clause. It does not apply to new applications. Lt. Peterson noted that the State requires a boiler inspection in addition to the inspections of the Sheriff's Water Patrol and Department of Natural Resources. Foster moved, Babcock seconded, recommendation to the Board the adoption of An Ordinance Relating to the Registration of Charter Boats; Amending Code Section 3.07, Subdivisions 3 and 4, Subdivision 3 to read ..... and the watercraft has passed all required inspections of the Sheriff's Water Patrol, Department of Natural Resources and State of Minnesota inspections as may be required by law from time to time. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Reaffirm Resolution No. 59, provision item 3, regarding fishing contest renewal application deadline. Currently LMCD code calls for fishing contest renewals submitted after December 1 of the preceding year be accompanied by a late fee. In January 1989 the resolution setting policy for the issuance of fishing contest permits was amended to require renewal applications be submitted 90 days in advance of the event to avoid $50 late fee penalty. Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to reaffirm Resolution No. 59 as amended January 25, 1989. Motion carried unanimously. $773 i Foster moved, Reese seconded, a recommendation to the Board that the LMCD attorney be instructed to amend Subd.5 (b) of the Code Sec. 3.09 to conform to the amended Resolution No. 59. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Resolution of Brodie concern for silt build-upon frontage relating to placement of channel buoys. lake Pillsbury reported Denis Bailey, Hennepin County Lakes Improvement, along with his maintenance people inspected the area covered by Mr. Brodie's concerns about silting of his lakeshore. They found the shallowest depth was 6' and no silt was found in either channel at the Arcola bridge. Bailey did suggest moving the buoys out further and narrowing the channel. Foster does not favor narrowing the channel but would to moving the channel markers out no more than 100' He favor diverting charter boats to the easterly channel. agree would Babcock also objected to narrowing the channel. Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, to recommend that a letter be authorized to Mr. Brodie to indicate the LMCD investigation of his complaint was thorough and it found no evidence of silt from boat traffic, noting the bottom is hard. Motion carried unanimously. Rascop moved, Foster seconded, a recommendation to the Board that a letter be sent to charter boat operators asking them to use the east-west channel except in the case of emergency. Motion carried unanimously. Pillsbury accepted the comments of the members for conveyance to Bailey. Buoy placement will be discussed at the January meeting. 4. MN DNR fish house license procedure update. The committee received a MN DNR response to the LMCD inquiry relating to registration of ice fishing houses. MN DNR advises it is unable to determine how many rental units are available on Lake Minnetonka since the registration procedure does not involve lake identification. It does not foresee sponsoring legislation requiring reflectorized material on fish houses. No further action was taken at this time. The inquirer is to be advised of the rental unit status. original 5. Charter Boats: Subcommittee report (Babcock) Babcock presented a study of charter boats prepared for Lake Use Committee, dated 11/21/89. It reviews existing ordinances, suggested revisions to the application form, suggested additions to the Water Fatrol requirements, a review of equipment requirelnents, review of berthing requirements, passenger pick up and drop off procedures. Babcock asked for a review of the document, comments and a return to the committee. additions and Inspections: Peterson stated inspections follow MN DNR regulations and it is his belief the MN DNR has adopted Coast Guard regulations. Radios: Pillsbury suggested all charter boats should have radios, monitored during the charter and operable. Signage: Foster favors as little signage as possible. Reese sees advantage in some method of identifying a boat when it is under charter. Rascop expressed concern about prohibiting any commercial signage as unlawful. Consensus favored a pennant as a suitable method of identifying boats under charter. Noise. Foster suggested a prohibition of loud speakers or bullhorns, particularly on tour charter boats. Berthing. Babcock would favor allowing one charter boat per residential property if the owner resides there. Babcock scheduled a subcommittee meeting, open to all members, for 7:00 p.m., Monday, December 18, place to be announced. Inspection reports/deposit refunds Foster moved, Reese seconded, a recommendation to the Board to refund Special Event $100 deposits to the following: Lower Lake lake race (a) Club for the 1989 Consolidation Race Schedule. (b) Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club for 1989 upper schedule. (c) Douglas J. Dunsheath for 1989 parasailing. Motion carried unanimously. Minnetonka Yacht 7. Magazine feature, Q~ ~9~9~ ~Qn~ regarding use of in state lakes and Lake Minnetonka. herbicides The article was submitted by the Executive Director for information of the committee. the 8. Water Patrol Report. Peterson reported Sgt. Wm. Chandler has met with the conservation officer to cover winter season activities such as fish houses and AVT operation. He stated they have not had any problems with ice fishermen to date but did have one rescue of a pedestrian who fell through the ice near shore. 9. Personal Watercraft public hearing report The committee received a review of the public hearing and Findings along with comments from the public received after the hearing. They also received a copy of MN DNR proposed legislation on Personal Watercraft. Legislation. Foster pointed out the fin DNR defines "Slow-No Wake" as ~ m.p.]',, while LMCD code defines it as 6 m.p.h. The state does not allow laws less restrictive than theirs and a change will be needed in the LMCD code. It was noted Subd. 1 (c) of the MN DNR proposed bill to regulate pws prohibits Personal Watercraft operation within 150 feet of any shoreline, dock, swimmer,or other watercraft at greater than a slow-no wake speed. LMCD has considered a greater distance and this can be done without conflicting with the State. Reese would like the LMCD to say something specific about wake jumping being unsafe. The committee agreed and suggested he prepare some language to define the restriction. Foster suggested limited passing or wake jumping to one time. Peterson said he doubted that would be acceptable by the courts. He also doubted the legislation would pass with the limited age of sixteen years and older. Dave Brewster and Mark Walker, representing M.J.S.A., a personal watercraft association, were present and commented as follows: It is up to the Water Patrol to monitor the sound level and violators should be ticketed rather than having restrictions placed on all operators. Foster responded that the intent is to prohibit pw modifications within the next two years. Babcock suggested Subd. 1 (f) in the proposed legislation read "On lakes 9~ ~Y~ smaller than 100 acres" The regulations for personal watercraft were referred back to the sub-committee for review of the discussion and proposed MN DNR legislation. Babcock moved, Foster seconded, a recommendation Board that they review the definition of "Slow-No Wake" LMCD code if in conflict wit}] state law. Motion unanimously. to the in the carried 10. Additional business. The Executive Director reported the office has received a notice about snowmobile rentals now being promoted on the lake in Spring Park. No action was taken. Reese submitted a water level chart and requested copies distributed to all members. be 11. Adjournment. There bein~ no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE Eugene Strommen Executive Director Robert Pillsbury, Chair ,- ._~.-_--. -' .... t',1,,~ .~A 3rd PATR OF CHANNEL BUOYS WTLL -~.. 7'....~ BE ADDED TO MAKE THIS CHANNEL Brackett or Oroflo Point ----~-T;; 2 2 I~ORE VISIBLE AND MORE INVITING ? ~ -.~ . _ -' , _: "-~,- :,r+,V /,Arc.' ~' ~ ..... ;'~ &~: ~~T~ ~ 1~ ~ TO USE THE EAST - WEST CHANNEL 'THZS PA~R Or '~HANNEL ~UOYS WZLL 8E~ ~+~ . - . ''--' APPROXZ"ATELY ~ fURTHER SOUTH--+.' + ........ · '-- _. . ~'~;:~?'-.~ // . -' -' - :: -. - - L:: _.-~ .... --~'-' Comfort town Point point .C .-- Charming '- point - RECEIyErj NOV 3 0 1989 i NORTH RED CHANNEL BUOY GREEN CHANNEL BUOY DANGER BUOY POINT BUOY 0 ID 0 IZ3 0 I~ 0 IZ) 0 I J3 0 1~3 0 I~ 0 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION November 27, 1989 Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners GeoFF Michael, Ken Smith, Frank Weiland, Bill Thai, and Jerry Clap- saddle, Michael Mueiler, Bill Voss, Council Representative Liz Jensen, City Planner Mark Koegler, City Manager Ed Shukle, and Secretary Peggy James. There were no citizens present. Introduction of new members to the Planning Commission. Michael Mueller and Bill Voss were welcomed to the commission. Mueller's term will expire 12/92 and Voss's term will expire 12/90. MINUTES: MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Michael to ap- prove the Planning Commission Minutes of November 13, '!989 as written. Motion carrlod unanimously. DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONAL: a. Comprehensive Plan Draft The City Planner reviewed the reasons why the City has a Com- prehensive Plan and how it is utilized. He also explained how the Shoreland Management Plan relates to the Comprehensive Plan. Koegler stated that when the Comprehensive Plan ts completed, after proper public hearings, a copy will be available at the library and the high points of the plan will be published tn the newspaper. The Commission determined to review the plan section by section. Other than minor grammatical corrections, the Following changes were made or discussed: PREFACE: Page PR-I, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence, was amended as Follows: "Second, in an age of increasing governmental regulation, Mound +~--reqoErect-to interact~ with a variety of regional, state and local agencies. Page PR-I, 4th paragraph, 1st sentence, was amended as Follows: "Third, Mound +s-reqofred-to maintain2 a comprehensive plan con- sistent with regional plans adopted by the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Waste Control C~ission." Planning Commission Minutes November 27, 1989 Page Two PHYSICAL FEATURES: Koegler commenteO that this section ts basically the same as the old plan. There was no Further discussion. GOALS AND POLICIES: Page GP-I, Natural Resources, Goal: there was a lengthy discus- sion pertaining to the second sentence of this goal. It was questioned tf this sentence is actually more of a "policy" than a "goal." the Commission voted to leave it as is. Page GP-2, Housing, Policy 2., was amended as Follows: "~iscourage new residential development StTOZTi~-b~ -dtscooraged From encroaching upon vital natural resources ehae-~e. Form-essen- ~+a+-~e~ee~+e~-~e~+e~s." Page GP-2, Housing, Policy 3., was amended as follows: "Es~ab++sh and M_alntain a predominately single Family housing base throughout the city. Page GP-3, Land Use, Policy 7. was amended to read as Follows: "Maintain the CBD area as the Focus of Mound's commercial ac- tivlty. Encourage a mix of downtown businesses including retail, offices, entertainment and service businesses. ~omme~-mfa+ ~eYe+e~me~-~~e-e~f-~he--do',w~t~~~~-~~et.~-~a~he~ ~han-eom~e~e-w+~h-fBB-area-bus+ness~ Chair Meyer recognized Commissioner Smith arriving at 8:55 p.m. Page GP-3, Land Use, Policy lO. "Continually monitor ordinances and policies that affect land use to ensure that they are reflec- tive of community policy." It was unanimously agreed to have this policy listed under all the sections within the Goals and Policies chapter. Each section name will be install where "land use" is presently stated. SOCIO-ECONOMIC: Thai commented that the 1987 population should be replaced with the more current 1988 Metropolitan Council Estimated population. LAND USE: The commission reviewed previous discussions regarding the pos- sibility of restricting new lot sizes to a minimum of 10,000 square Feet. They also discussed how this would affect existing undersized lots and how these undersized lots will be difficult to insure tn the Future IF they are considered nonconforming. Planning Commission Minutes November 27, 1989 Page Three HOUSING: No pertinent changes were made to this section. TRANSFK]RTATION: No pertinent changes were made to this section. RECREATION: No pertinent changes were made to this section. IMPLEMENTATION: No pertinent changes were made to this section. Ciapsaddle raised the issue of requiring a site placement plan with all zoning requests. Clapsaddle explained the importance of having a site plan showing the proposed location of a house, and how future variances can be reduced if a house is placed cor- rectly on a 1or. The commission voted against having this issue addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Thai to recommend to the City Council to approve the co~rehensive plan for draft purposes with the corrections noted. Motion carried unanimously. Central Business District (CBD) Koegler explained that he has concluded from Planning Commission discussions that there needs to be more emphasis on downtown in the Comprehensive Plan. He explained that there are too many different perceptions of what Hound's downtown should be, there- Fore there needs to be a focus of where tt should go. He sug- gested that the downtown plan be made a separate issue, however, keeping it compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Koeg]er stated that he has worked with a firm in the past called Public Financial Systems, and their expertise ts in finance and market analysis. The City Manager Informed the commission that the city has the ability, through block grant monies that have been obtained from Hennepin County, to hire a firm to do a study. He explained that the city was provided with a $15,000 grant for the CBD to be used to follow-up on a Butlding Development Services study, however the funds were never used. This money has to be allocated by the end of this year in order to be used, or tt goes back to the County. 3781 Planning Commission Minutes November 27, 1989 Page Four The City Manager stated that the hired Firm would research Mound's trade area, what types oF businesses Mound needs, Feasible businesses, what image to project, if buildings should be demolished or redeveloped, etc. MOTION n~zle by Mueller, seconded by densen to recommend to the City Council to use the CBOG money towards a study on the Central Business District. Motion carried unanimously. b. City Council Representative Report. Jensen reviewed the City Council meeting oF November 13, 1989 and the agenda oF the November 28, 1989 meeting. MOTION made by Weiland seconded by Jensen to adJourn the meeting at 10~56 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Chair, Bill Meyer Attest: BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE A-2309 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0239 Phone (612) 348-6509 November 14, 1989 TO: Municipal Recycling Coordinators Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 89-11-961R1 concerning the composting of yard waste in 1990. This resolution will be discussed at the Public Service Comittee Meeting on Thursday, November 30, 1989, at 10:00 a.m. You may wish to contact your Commissioner on this matter or voice your opinion at to the Committee Meeting. If you have any questions please call me at 348-3054. Sincerely, Recycling Coordinator Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer The foZlowin~ resolution was introduced by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Con~nissioner Sivanich: BE IT RESOLVED, that no later than Hatch 1~ 1990, Hennepin County requests each municipality to identify one or more sites withln the municipality and issue all required permits for the compostin~ of yard waste collected within that municipality; and BE IT FUi~THEi~ RESOLVED, that a municipality may satisfy the above request by entering into an agreement that allows deposit and composting of yard waste collected within [ha~ municipality in another municipality; and . BE IT FUI~THE.~ ~E$OLVED, ~hat any municipality that does not either identi~y such a yard waste composting site w~thin its borders and issue required pe=mits, or enter into an agreement with another municipality for deposit and compostin~ of its yard waste, shall not be eligible for recycling reimbursement under the coun=y's fundins assistance policy, unless the County 8oard specifically determines otherwise after a good faith effort. RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO ~rNNEPIN COUNTY PROPOSED RESOLUTION #89-11-961R1 WHEREAS, Hennepin County is considering requiring each city to set up its own compost site(s) within or without its borders, and WHEREAS, the penalty for failure to make such arrangement by March 15, 1990 is loss of funding for a city's recycling program, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina would incur significant expense in acquiring land and equipment to provide a compost site, and k~EREAS, the City of Edina has entered into contracts with Hennepin County for funding based on the effectiveness of the recycling program, and WHEREAS, the Edina recycling program for 1990 has been predicated upon.the continuaticn of the present Henneptn County funding policy, and WHEREAS, discontinuance of funding would jeopardize the future of the Edina Recycling Program, a program which has now surpassed the waste reduction goals set by the County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina opposes passage of Proposed Resolution ~89-11-961R1. ADOPTED this 20th day of November, 1989. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 20, 1989 and as recorded in the Minutes of safd Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of November, 1989. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk ED! NA ST $0TH STREET. EDINA..~,~INNESOTA -'547.: 612-927-8861 November 22, 1989 }~. Kay }~tchell, Clerk Hennepin County Board of Commissioners 2400 Government Center Minnaapolis, }~{ 55487 Re: Proposed Resolution #89-11-961R1 Dear Ms. Mitchell: At its meeting of November 20, 1989 the Edina City Council adopted the enclosed resolution concerning the above referenced resolution which will be considered by the Board of Cormmissioners on November 30, 1989 at 10:00 a.m. Will you please give copies of the Council's resolution to each Commissioner prior to the meeting. Thanks for your assistance. Very truly yours, Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk enclosures (8) LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLIC 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 December 11, 1989 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle, City Manager ~"{ Len Harrell, Chief of Police Street Lights I recommend that a street light be installed in the area of Argyle Lane and Lanark Rd. as outlined on attached information. TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Chief Harre11 Officer Ewald December 9, 1989 Street light on Argyle Lane The delay of this response was due to difficulty in contact- ing some of the residents on Argyle Lane because of their unavailability. As of December 4, 1989 I have made contact with all but one of the residents on Argyle Lane in refer- ence to an additional street light. Their comments are be- low. 3100 Argyle Lane The resident of many years was admitted to a nursing home and the property sold. As of this time the new owners have not moved in. 4855 Lanark Road Gary Blix would like to see an additional light any- where in the area as he stated he had a theft in the past from his yard. 3107 Argyle Lane Mike Kleyla stated he would like to see an additional light, but would prefer the location on the northeast corner of Argyle Lane and Glasco Road. 3125 Argyle Lane Peter Archambault stated it would be beneficial there were more lighting in the area. if 3137 Argyle Lane Dave Nelson feels the area is poorly 1it and would like to have Northern States Power install a light on the northwest corner of Argyle Lane and Lanark Road. 3149 Argyle Lane Dennis Adair feels an additional light is necessary and that it should be installed in the area of Argyle Lane and Glasco Road. 3161 Argyle Lane Dave Burgess feels that additional lighting is needed in the area even though there is one located on his corner lot located on Argyle Lane at Tuxedo Boulevard. I have enclosed a map showing current locations of existing street lights and locations for one additional street light which I believe is needed. If an additional light is installed in the area, my map shows two different locations for a street light which would most benefit all residents in the area. 313 ? /~r2y/e Z~e-