Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2001-07-10
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 10, 2001 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: JUNE 26, 2001 REGULAR MEETING JUNE 27, 2001 SPECIAL MEETING: 6:00 JUNE 27, 2001 SPECIAL MEETING: 7:00 JUNE 28, 2001 SPECIAL MEETING *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS *C. ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 260:10 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION *D. SET DATE FOR DEDICATION OF DON SCHERVEN MEMORIAL P~: AUG 11 COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) MOUND LIQUOR UPDATE ACTION ON COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MINNEHAHA WATERSHED DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF MOUND FOR LOCAL WATER PLANNING AND REGULATION ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350:505 OF THE- CITY CODE RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION OF THE ZONING CODE PAGE 8035-8038 8039 8040 8041-8042 8043-8065 8066-8067 8O68 8069-8071 8072-8073 ACTION ON ETHICS GUIDELINES 8074-8100 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 9: CONgIDERATION OF POLICY ON APPOINTMENTg & REAPPOINTMENTg gl01-gl04 TO ADVISORY COMMISSIONS 10. 11. 12. DISCUSSION REGARDING FISHING DOCKS PROGRAM SET SPECIAL MEETING DATE FOR DOCK PROGRAM FEES WORKSHOP INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS 8105-8107 A. LMC correspondence 8108-8112 B. AMM Fax News 8113-8116 C. LMCD communications 8117-8161 D. Police Department Report: June 2001 8162-8167 E. Reports: Coordinated Pool CBDG Program 8168-8192 F. Fire Commission minutes 8193-8199 G. FYI: 2001 Elected Officials Salary Survey 8200-8208 H. Mediacom newsletter 8209-8212 I. Report: 2001 Water Patrol Participation 8213-8214 J. Report: May 2001 Recycling Day 8215 K. CompSource newsletter by Riley, Dettmann & Kelsey 8216-8217 L. Report: 2001 Zoning Activity 8218-8220 M. FYI: Request of Refund of Moving Permit Fee 8221-8222 13. ADJOURN is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citFofmound, com. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 26~ 2001 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Counci.lmem:bers Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, Klm Anderson and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager, Kandis Hanson; Acting City Clerk, Bonnie Ritter; city Attorney, John Dean; City Planner, Loren Gordon; City Engineer, John Cameron; Todd Warner, Dorothy & Bill Netka, Jo Longpre, Dotty O'Brien, Gene & Marty Garvais, Betty Strong, Ben Withhart, Bob & Sharon Riebe, Marilyn Byrnes, Marion Poteete, Patty Guttormson, Cathy Bailey, Jack Weist, Sharon Cook, Roger Westman, John Costello. Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m., and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 2. APPROVE AGENDA City Manager, Kandis Hanson, removed #9, Watershed District Agreement, and #5, public hearings, from the agenda. Item #5 will be replaced by item H under the consent agenda. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. CONSENT AGENDA Brown .requested that item E be pulled from the consent agenda. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the consent agenda as amended. Ali voted in favor. Motion call.ed. A. Approve minutes: June 12, 2001 regular meeting; June 13, 2001 meeting continuation; and June 13, 2001 special meeting B. ,a,43prove payment of claims in the amount of $186,426.50 C. Approve recommendation for financial system hardware and software update D. Approve tree removal license for Roger's Tree Service E. Removed F. Approve Stormwater Facility Maintenance Agreement for Langdon Woods G. Approve Development Agreement with Brenshell Development Corporation 1 -8035- Mound City Council Minutes - June 26, 2001 Ho Reschedule public hearings: July 24, 2001, 7:30 p.m. for RD Development: Langdon Bay (Case 01-20: slope easement vacation and Case 01-23: Butternut St. vacation) 3E. CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES WITH LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Brown expressed concern that more enforcement and deputies were not visible during the City Days fireworks. Hanson informed him that the licensing agreement called for four patrol boats, but not that they had to be sheriff's boats. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to approve the contract which expires December 31, 2001, subject to the City Manager following up on the sources and reductions of future funding. Ayes: Brown, Anderson and Meyer. Nayes: Hanus and Meisel. Motion carried. 4. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Dreamwood Addition Commons Bob Riebe appeared as a representative of the residents in Dreamwood Addition, to officially notify the Council that they have formed a lakeshore committee for settlement of the commons issue in their area. City Manager Hanson informed him that she is aware of a meeting scheduled at the Mound Depot for July 12, but that the city's intention is to provide assistance with the assembly of data, provide a meeting space, but not pa~icipate in the initial meetings. John Dean indicated that Leah Weycker has been notified and is willing to sit on these meetings and help with resolution of the issue. Maho,qany Bay Todd Warner approached the Council with questions regarding his current conditional use permit that involves blacktopping at his business. Hanus suggested that with the complexity of this issue, being more than one property owner involved, that it go back to Staff and the Planning Commission for their recommendation. Removed. 6. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 01-54: RESOLUTION TO DENY A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6024 CHERRYWOOD ROAD, PID #23-117-24.34-0104, P & Z CASE #01-06 AND #01.08. 2 -8036- Mound City Council Minutes - June 26, 2001 7. MAHOGANY BAY- OPERATIONS PERMIT Todd Warner informed the Council that he wants to lease space in the Balboa building for his operation. This would be used for sales, service, restoration and storage of vintage boats. It was determined that the operation is environmentally approved because everything is varnished and painted by hand. A pressurized system using walnut shells is used instead of chemicals for all stripping. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 01-55: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN OPERATIONS PERMIT FOR MAHOGANY BAY LOCATED AT 5300 SHORELINE DRIVE (BALBOA BUILDING) 8. WESTEDGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT City Engineer, John Cameron, explained that the city only received one bid for the Westedge Project and that he recommends rejecting this bid and re-bidding in the Spring, in the hopes of receiving more bids, and lower bids. This will not hold up the Rottlund Homes development process, because their first phase will enter from County Road 15. MOTION by Brown, seconded by adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 01-56: RESOLUTION REJECTING BID FOR WESTEDGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9. Removed. 10. FISHING DOCK PROGRAM MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to table this item until a report is received from the Parks Commission. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 11. BUDGET REQUEST BY SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES Ben Withhart addressed the Council with a request for $20,000 for the budget year 2002. He stated that there is less money in the pool than previous years, with more competition for these funds. Hanus questioned the value of being a member of this pool, and if the City could pull out of it. City Manager Hanson will check on the length of the pool and the possibility of withdrawing from it. MOTION .by Meyer to support the Senior Center with $20,000 in the budget year 2002. Motion died for lack of a second. Discussion followed with regard to the importance of censi~ring this request with the rest of the City budget process, which is beginning shortly. Mayor Meisel informed the seniors that the request will be considered during budget negotiations. 3 -8037- Mound City Council Minutes. June 26, 2001 12. CHAPTER V- NUISANCE ORDINANCE City Manager Hanson informed the Council that staff is concerned with the present ordinance because of the enforcement language. It is felt that the reason enforcement is not taking place is because the policy is not airtight. Staff feels it's broke the way it is and needs to be fixed. After discussion it was decided that Hanus, Anderson, Police Chief Len Harrell, and City Prosecutor Craig Mertz should meet to go over the ordinance and fine tune it for Council consideration. Mayor Meisel called for a 10 minutes recess at 8:40 p.m., with executive session to follow the break. 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION - CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MOTION by Meisel, seconded by Meyer to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 01-57: RESOLUTION AMENDING EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT BE'i'WEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND CITY MANAGER, KANDIS HANSON. 14. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adjourn the meeting at 10:25 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: A~i.ng City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 4 -8038- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 27~ 2OO1 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Wednesday, June 27, 2001, at 6:00 p.m. in the council chambers of said City. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown and Kim Anderson. Members Absent: Councilrnembers Mark Hanus and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager, Kandis Hanson; Acting City Clerk, Bonnie Ritter; City Finance Director, Gino Businaro. The meeting was called to order at 6:18 p.m. by Mayor Meisel. STAFF DIRECTION FOR 2002 BUDGET Finance Director, Gino Businaro, asked the Council for direction regarding guidelines for the preparation of the 2002 budget. After discussion, it was the consensus to inform Department Heads to use an 8% increase as a guideline when preparing their 2002 budgets. Businaro also asked what figure the Council was looking for as far as fund balance as a percentage of expenditures, and 30%-35% was the consensus. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Attest: ~ng City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -8039- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2001 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Wednesday, June 27, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers at 5341 Maywood Road in said City. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus and Klm Anderson. Members Absent: Peter Meyer Others Present: City Manager, Kandis Hanson; Acting City Clerk, Bonnie Ritter; City Finance Director, Gino Businaro; City Engineer, John Cameron; Public Works Director, Grog Skinner;, Mediator, Don Brauer; Metro Council Representatives, Bill Moeller & Tim Keegan; Residents; Lisa Martin, Carol Lindgren, Betty Davis, Don & Merva Jacobsen, Wayne & Jackie Davis, Margaret & Dennis Schroeder, Sharon & Phil Baumel. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Mayor Meisel. LANGDON LANE SEWER BACK-UP Mediator, Don Brauer, presented maps showing the lift stations in the area of Langdon Lane. A sewer back-up occurred in this area during hard rains in April. Dis~ssion followed regarding analysis of the situation, alternative solutions and what the next step should be in this procesS. The solutions presented included; the residents installing valves and pumps to eliminate any back-up, alternating lift stations pumping at different times, Putting in a lift station at the end of Langdon Lane, asking Metro to extend their force main downstream from the affected area and dump downstream, and puffing a lift station in just for the affected area. After discussi~, it was decided that the City Engineer will prepare cost and feasibility study en the installation of separate-sanitary sewer line and lift station for the affected area and present this to the City Council at their July 24th meeting. This will be coordinated with a presentation to be made to the Metro Council at their August meeting. Hanson indicated that the City and Metro C~I would enter a cooperative agreement for the solution. There was c, encem by the residents on what they should do in the short term while this permanent remedy is being pursued. It was the consensus of the Council that it's up to each individual resident if they want to use valves for the short term solution. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:43 p.m. Attest: Acing City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -8040- MOUND CiTY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 28~ 2001 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Thursday, June 28, 2001, at 6:30 p.m. at 5341 Maywood Road of said City. Council,members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, Klm Anderson and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager, Kandis Hanson and Acting City Clerk, Bonnie Ritter Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:37 p.m. REVIEW DOCK AND SLIP FEES The Council discussed different possibilities and aspects of raising the dock and slip fees collected by the City. Hanus made the point that abutting residents already are taxed as if they own the lakeshore, and because of this should have less dock rates than non-abutters. They are also the ones that maintain the lakeshore. Meisel stated that she would like to see a credit go back to the homeowner that maintains the lakeshore. Brown stated that people renting docks elsewhere on Lake Minnetonka pay around $5,000 per year for docking, storing, etc. Raising the city fees would still result in a "deal" for the boat owner. Private citizens also have been approached by dock seekers, willing to pay $1200 - $1500/year to dock their boats at an abutters dock. Meyer wantrs to find out what the total cost of the dock program per year, including staff time, docks, maintenance, etc., so that a total picture can be looked at. He is in favor of increasing the fees to make the program self-sustaining, but not profitable. After the program cost is known, a percentage increase across the board was suggested to make the program self-sustaining. Brown feels that the City should be able to make money on the dock program, as the municipal liquor store does. This profit, like the liquor store's, could be put into the general fund to help the entire City. Meisel suggested having non-traversable commons leased to the abutting property owners. This would eliminate the cost of operation for those commons areas. The legality and process will be checked into by Staff. Brown suggested raising the multiples to $350; the non-abutters to $250; and the abutters to $200. Meyer stated that he will never support a different fee for abutters and non-abutters. Anderson suggested finding out what the program cost is, add a fund balance a designated extra amount. From this total the dock fees can be figured, out. The City can make money and the residents will still have the best deal on the lake. -8041 - Hanson suggested a percentage increase rather than dollar amount because of the different categories of docks, footages, etc. Brown then suggested raising the multiples 100%, non-abutters 50% and abutters 25%. It was the consensus that the total program costs and the above stated percentages will be figured so that a realistic total picture can be looked at. Another workshop date will be set at the next council meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Attest: Acting City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -8042- PAGE I P U R C H A S E J'O U R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR NO. IN¥OICE NMBR AO071 010'614 INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE ' DAlE 'STATUs AMOUNT DESCi~IPTION PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 010628 PRE-PAID 6/30101 6130/01 900.0'0 PR2 CREDIT UNION EE DEDUCTION 900.00 JRNL-CD 10:1.( AFFINITY PLUS FEDERAL OR.ED VENDOR TOTAL ~ A0312 010618 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 AMERICANA FIREWORKS DISPLA VENDOR TOTAL BO710 010515 900.00 PR3 CREDIT UNION EE DEDUCTION 900~00 JRNL~CD 1800,OO 10,000.00 CITY DAYS FIREWORKS 10,000.00 JRNL-CD 10000,00 01-2040-0000 01-2300-0000 _!..ql( ' BREIT'NER. JOHN COB15 010601 PRE-PAID 6,175.80 THRU 05-15-01 PLMB INSPECTIONS 01-3254-0000 6/30/01 6/30/01 6,175.80 JRNL-CD 101( VENDOR TOTAL 6175.80 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 TAL ONE VENDOR TOTAL 379.45 21.95 ..04905~01 INTERN'ET, HANSON, KAN 190.00 04-05-01 INTERNET, RITTER, BON 01-4140-4130 21.95 04-19-01 INTERNET, RAHN, JODI 01-4040-4130 ~9.95 04-19-01 INTERNET, FIRE DEPART 22-4170-4130 21.95 04-19~01 INTERNET, BUSINARO, G. 21.95 04-26-01 I'N'TE:RNET, ND'RLANDER, 01-4.19:0-4'130 21.95 05~:Oi~:~.:O1 I, NTERNET, SUT'HERL.AND .... ~0~1~0~.~._ 7.32 05-03-01 INTERNET, SKINNER, GR 01-4280-4130 7.31 05-03-01 INTERNET, SKINNER, GR 73-7300-4130 7.32 05-03-01 INTERNET, SKINNER, GR 01-4280-4130 7~32 '05~-+'~i I~TERNET, SKiN~ER',: GR 7.32 05~0~01 INTERNET, SKINNER, GR ?~00~41~0 7.31 05-0~'01 I'NTERNET, 5KINN'ER, :GR 78~:7800~ 15.85 FINANCE CHARGE (TO BE CREDITED 01-4090-4100 379.45 JRNL-CD 1010 010521 PRE-:PAID !02.4~ THRU 05-21-01 & PHONE 6/30/01 6/30/01 010601 PRE'PAID 6/30/01 6/3.0/01 CITIZENS COMMUNICIATIONS VENDOR TOTAL C 088:8 010614 PRE'PAID .... 102.49 THRU 05-21-01 & PHONE 73-7300-3220 102.48 THRU 05-2i-0i & PHONE 78-7800-3220 307.46 JRNL-CD lOlO 168.14 06-01 g52-472-3093 7!-7500'3,220 168.14 JRNL-CD :....,.' ........... 475.60 5;~8'6;:00' PR2.' CREDIT UN!ON EE DE:DUCTION 6/30/01 6130/01 5,486.00 JRNL-CD 101.0 010628 PRE,P~ID 5;'~86~00 PR~ ~REDiT O'NiON: ~ DEDUC~":i~O~ (~:~'S2O~'O~%:O'o(j"~ ........ 5/30101 6/30/01 5,486.00 JRNL-CD lO!O CITY COUNTy CREDIT UNION VENDOR TOTAL ~0972.00 D!!?) 010529 PRE-PAID 75.00 2001 BOOT ALLOWANCE 6/30/0i 6/30/0i 75.00 JR'N'L~CD 7~-7800~2:2;40 lOlC -8043- PAGE 2 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-01 'CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE'HOLD NO;"iNg'~'~CE NHBR 'DATE ~ATE 5TAT:U~ A~OUN~ DAMON HARDINA D1328 010618 VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 PRE-PAID lO0.O0 PIZZA'S 01~415.0-~.~.0 6/30/01 6'/30/0~ iO0.O0 JRNL~CD 101 010627 PRE-PAID 27~0i 0.6~27'01 BUDGET MEETING 01-402~0'~1i0 6/30/01 6/30/01 27.01 JRNL-CD 10i DOMINO'S PIZZA VENDOR TOTAL 127.01 G1983 010614 PRE-PAID 336.98 6/30/01 6130101 ~36.98 GUARANTEE LIFE VENDOR TOTAL 336.98 PR.2 07-01 GROUP BL-'2209 JRNL~CD 01-2'04!0-0000 H2151 010604 PRE-PAID 16'5.00 6130/01 6/30/01 165.00 CA2116 PRE-PAID 77,188.80 6/30/01 6/30/01 77,188.80 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER VENDOR TOTAL 77353,80 H2290 010612 PRE-"~AI'D 50,'0~0:0.00 6/30/01 6/30/01 50,000.00 2.001'T'OBACC.O LICENSE JR'NL-~D 2001 ASSESSOR SERVICES JRNL-CD iOl' 0i-4o?0-~20o lol LEV~¥ Ap. PROVED BY C. QUN:CIL O!t~2;300,-O~O:O:~. JRNL-CD 101 HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUT* VENDOR TOTAL I2~-01 ~Z0'61~ PRE-PAID 6/~0101 6110'101 010628 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 50000.O0 330.'00 3'~0.00 330.00 330.00 PR2 R:ETIREME.NT EE DEOUCTIO!N J~N~'~CD ~O'l PR3 RETIREMENT EE DEDUCTION 01-2040-0000 JRNL-CD 101 ~-~ :- I:CMA RETIREMENT T'RUST-'457 VENDOR TOTAL 660.00 I"~32'8"0~0~4 PR"E~'A~'D ............. 5o.0'~ .....P~2'N~cc~M 476':86-9619 ............ ~'-20~"~'£'~'~'~" '~ 6130/01 6/30101 50.00 JRNL-CD 101 0106'28 PRE-PAID 50.00 PR'3 NICCUM 376-86-9619 0i-2.040-0000 6/30/01 6/30101 5'0.00 JR. NL-C.D 101 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL lO0.O0 K2501 010604 PRE-PAID 42.74 6/3'0/01 6/30/01 REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE 73-2050-0000 JRNL~CD .......... KESTNER, AL VENDOR TOTAL 42.74 L2770 010627 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI: VENDOR TOTAL M3249 010604 PRE'-PA I D 2,297.68 2001 WATER PATROL SERVICES 2,297.68 JRNL-CD 2297.68 2,500.00 CITY DAYS FIRE WORKS 01-4399-4100 101 .... ol-23o0'-0'00~'" -8044- PAGE 3 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NNETONKA PORTABLE DREDG! VENDOR TOTAL 2~00.00 M3288 010614 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 010628 PRE-PAID 6/~0/016/3'0/01 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT C VENDOR TOTAL M3295 010621 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 MN, STATE OF (CPV PROGRAM) VENDOR TOTAL M3520 010619 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 010628 PRE-PAID 6/~0/01 6/30/~! ) POSTMASTER VENDOR ~OTAL N3745 010614 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 NCPE~S VENDOR TOTAL P3270 010611 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AN VENDOR TOTAL P3952 010516' PETTY' CASH P3997 010606 3?5.63 PR2 NI¢'CUM 0.i:21~:4~'.~:~:b 129..88 PR2 JAYKO 01-2~0-0'000 5:05.5t JRNL-:CD 375.63 PR3 NICCUM 0~-2040-0000 129.88 PR3 JAYKO 01-2040-0000 50'~.5'~ 'JRNL-¢.'D ..... 1011~02 150.00 BALANCE DUE MEMBERSHIP 01-4320-4130 150.00 JRNL-CD 101. 150.00 104.32 ~'TILITY BILLING 104.32 UTILITY BILLING 78-7800-3210 208.64 JRNL-CD 9.i4 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 8i.97 REPLENISH POST~G'E METER 41.92 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 215.93 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 31.90 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER ~i."~t RE:P.LE.NIS:H POSTAGE METER . 20:0~'41 REpL:ENISH POSTAGE HEfER 2:~.~:,37 ':REPLENISH PO~GE ME~'ER 100.07 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 14.35 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 2.33 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER l~O00aO0 JRNL-CD 1208.64 24.00 12.00 36.00 PR2 07-01 EE DEDUCTION PP2 07-01 CLARK, FRAN JRNL-CD 36.00 90.00 LICENSE WILLIAM, MURRAY 90.00 JRNL-CD PRE-PAID 6/30/01 90.00 ...... 5~'.00 .... ~OG/~T PETTY CASH 6/30/01 50.00 JRNL-CD VENDOR TOTAL 5~,00 01-4070-~210 0!~:~,0,20~,210_ 01-4040-3210 01-4090-3210 22-4170-3210 0::~-43~0-321~~ '8~-C340-3210 0'~-4t90~32i~L 01-4140-3210 73-7300-3210 .78~7800-3~.~.9 lot( 01-2040-0000 01-2040-D000 01-4140-41&0 101( 101[ PR.E-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 425~00 ADykNCE JUNE 7,9, DETFlOIT LA'KES 425.00 JRNL-CD 101: -8045- PAGE 4 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD ~0~" iNV~iCE 'NMBR D'ATE , D~TE" 'STATUS AMOUNT:' D~'~CR'~PT:~'O'N PEDERSON~ GREG VENDOR TOTAL 425.00 P4115 010614 PRE-PAID 676.89 PR2 TOTAL DEDUCTED & PAID Oi-2040-OuO0 PRUDENT~AL L~FE ZNSUEAN~E VENDOR TOTAL 687.94 54~45 010606 PRE-PA:ID Z, 3i:3.75 RE~ ~D ~:TI O:N SALTER, H~CHELLE VENDOR TOTAL HN REGZSTRAR VENDOR TOTAL 670.00 UNIVERSITY OF V5175 010620 PRE-PAID 8.2i 05-01 612-269-9058 FINANCE 01-4090-3220 22"2~ O'5~O~' 6~L2-'5:9:0~357 STREETS 22.21 0~]-~0i 6~.2-:590~4351 WATER ~3:'7:3i0:0~:~22g 12.01 27.95 27.44 27.44 27.44 05-01 612-554-6520 SEWER ?8-?800-3220 o5-oi 6i2-5~i-21io PATROL 845 oi-4i4o-32~o 05-0~ 612-58~-6441 SQUAD ~84~ 0~-4~40-3220 05-01 612-57~-6442 SQUAD ~842 01-4140-3220 ~i 27.44 05-01 6[2-S81-6443~ SQUAD #843 oi-4i~o-32~o · ~ ~':';:~;:': ,.0':.~:~::~'~~ ~.~,~ 5.60 05-01 6~2-75Z-3573 HOUND FIRE ~ ', 8.21 05-01 612-875-4502 RESCUE TRUC · 27.44 05-01 612-58~6405 INVESTIGATO 01-4140-3220 ,~:: VERIZ. ON ~IRELESS VENDOR TOTAL 3'~5..31 . . ~.,~, )(,: Z5871 01060~2 PRE-PAID 400.00 CITY DAYS PARADE UNiT 0Z-2300-0000 ',;, 6/30/01 6/30/01 400.00 JRNL-CD 101~ : . ZUHRAH SHRINE CHANTERS VENDOR TOTAL 400.:00 '' i] PAL,; T~H i, ~.Z6!26 .0i0606 6/30/01 6/30/01 425.00 JRNL-CD i01( VENDOR TOTAL ' 4:25;00 ........ 6/30/0i 6/30/01 425.00 JRNL-CD 101~ -8046- PAGE 5 AP-C02-OZ VENDOR 'No~ ~NVOZcE BABB'. PAUL 5129 010606 . MAAS~ JASON 16657 010606 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND ZNVOICE DUE HOLD vENDoR TOTAL 425,0'~ ...... PRE-PAID 425.00 ADVANCE JUNE 7-9 DETROIT LAKES 22-4170-4110 : VENDOR TOTAL 425..00 PRE-PAID 425.00 ADVANCE JUNE 7-9 DETROIT LAKES 22-4170-4110 6/30/01 6/30/01 425.00 JRNL-CD lOI PALM, MICHAEL VENDOR TOTAL 16688 010613 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/0~ ST. PAUL, CITY OF VENDOR TOTAL 16690 010613 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 SUPERIOR TENT RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 16693 0~06013 PRE-PAID 6/30101 6/30~01 ZUHRAH SHRINE CYCLE CORP VENDOR TOTAL 16695 010613 PRE-PAID 6/30/0~ 6/30/0! PATCHES THE CLOWN VENDOR TOTAL 16695 010613 PRE-PAID 6/30,/01 6t30/01 ~AMER'S KRACKER-JA~KS VE~D,OR TOTAL 16834 010606 PRE-PAID 6/30/0i 6/30/01 ANDERSON, JEFF VENDOR TOTAL 16956 010604 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 O.F.M.O. VENDOR TOTAL 16961 49689 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 BENTON COUNTY VENDOR TOTAL 16963 010613 PRE-PAID 6/30/01 6/30/01 425.00 500.00 CITY DAYS PARADE UNIT 01-2300-0000' 500.00 JRNL-CD 101~ 500.00 525.00 CITY DAYS PARADE UNIT 01-2.3010~00:00 525.00 JRNL-CD 101( 525.00 1,000.00 CITY DAYS PARADE UN£T 01-2300-0000 1,000.00 JRNL-CD '~1:1 1000.00 140.00 CITY DAYS PARADE UNIT 01~2300.90'~,:~- t40.00 JRNL-CD 'I,0 ~ i40.00 '" ' 750.00 CITY DAYS ~ARADE UNIT .... 0!,2300-00~0 750. O0 JRNL-CD 1011( 7;50.00 425.00 ADVANCE JUNE 7-9 DETROIT LAKES 22-4170-4110 425.00 JRNL-CD 101[ 425.00 110.00 SOFTWARE OFFICE 2000 PRO 01-4095-41i~ 110.00 JRNL-CD 101i i10.00 300.00 BOOKING 6599, CHORN, KENNETH 0~-2300-0000 300.00 JRNL-CD lOlC 300.00 685.00 CITY DAYS PARADE UNIT 01-2300-0000 685.00 JRN'L-CD !~.~ -8047- PAGE 6 P U R C H A $ E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD ~ Z6964 9385 ~ S~i~N AGE,.THE. ~-'~:' Z6965 010615 TRANS-ALARM ~-~ Z6966 010627 RAIL'AMER ICA. PRE-PAID 53.25 VEHICLE SIGNS 22-4170- 53.25 VEHICLE SIGNS ~[~4~-~10~ · yE:NDOR TOTAL ZO,6~ 50 . ; PRE-PAID 20.00 SEMINAR 22-4~70-4110 6/30/01 6/30/01 20.00 JRNL-CD 1010 VENDOR TOTAL 20.00 PRE.PAiD ; .......... 600.00 PERMIT WESTEDGE WATERMAIN 73-7300-4220 6/30/01 6/30/01 600.00 JRNL-CD 101C INC. vENDOR TOTAL 6001'00 TOT,AL~ ALL VEND:ORS L76.~5'8:~.~122 -8048- PAGE 1 AP-C02-O1 VENDOR NO. INVOICE NMBR A0333 010622 3CO OIL COMPANY INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE DATE STATUS ~ A0338 10403 ~1~ ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL A0385 04117406 04117413 04117419 04117609 07117309 04118107 07118011 04118315 77i0/01 VENDOR TOTAL 7110101 7/10101 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/0i 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7110/01 7/10101 7/10/01 79:117'906 7/10/01 7/10/01 ~ ARTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE VENDOR TOTAL A0404 16162 161.64 16166 16168 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 16170 16172 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND 49,88 THRU 06,22-01 GAS CHARGES 49.88 JR NL-CD 49.88 40.99 PAGER REPAIR 4.'0,99, J~NL'CD 40.99 70:.32:0 o 124.80 ICE 71-7100-9~50' 124.80 JRNL-CD i01~ 52.80 ICE 71-7100-~550 52.80 JRNL-CD 101¢ 40.80 ICE 7~-7100-95'50" 40.80 JRNL-CD i01{ 112.80 ICE 71-7100-'9'550 112.80 JRNL-CD lO1C 60..00 ICE 71-7100-955~ 60.00 JRNL-CD 1.01~ 126.00 ICE 71-Zi00'-9550 126.00 JRNL-CD 101C t00~80 ICE 71;~0~550:" 100.80 JRNL-CD ~01~ 180.00 ICE 71-7100-9550 180.00 JRNL-CD lOlC 76.84 ICE 7t-.7100-955~ 76.84 JRNL-CD 101C 874.8'4 12.94 06-01 PHILBROOK PARK 01-4340-3900 12.94 JRNL-CD IO.~C 12.94 06-01 HIGHLAND PARK 01'4340-3'900 12.94 JRNL-CD IO1C 12.94 06-01 SWENSON PARK 01-4340-3900 12.94 JRNL-CD iOlC 12,94 06~01 TYRONE PARK 01-4340-3900 12.94 JRNL-CD IO1C 12.94 06-01 THREE POINTS PARK 01-4340-3900 12.9.4 JRNL-CD ~01~ 12.94 06,01 WYCHWOOD BEACH 01-43:40'3900 12.94 JRNL-CD iO1C -8049- PAGE 2 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE NO. I N V 0 !'C'E N'M ~:~' D'AT E DUE HOLD D'AT E S T'A T'~J AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 16~74 16176 16179 21284 21285 21286 21287 21288 21289 21290 21291 · .. 21 P 9~2 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL A0475 6814 AVR, INCORPORATED !.-,, B0549. 21658100 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10101 7/10/01 7/10/01 7'/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/i0/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/1:0/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 12.94' 06ZOl'pEMBRo~K~ 'BE~'CH ........ ~2~40~., : 12.94 JRNL-CD 10 12.86 06'01 C. ANARY BEACH 12a'86 JRNL-CD 33.94 06-01 CENTERVIEW BEACH 33.94 JRNL-CD 51.45 07-0~ CANARY BEAC:H 51..45 JRNL~CD 135.78 07-01 CENTERVIE~ BEACH 135.78 JRNL-CD 51.7'8 07401 HIGHLAND PARK 51.78 JRN'L~CD 01-4340-3900 1010 1010 01-4340-3900 1010 lOlO 282.05 07-01 MOUND BAY PARK 01-4340-3900 282.05 JRNL-CD 1010 5'1.78 07'01 PEMBROOKE BEACH 51.78 JR.N.L-CD 1010 1010 51.78 07-01 PHILBROOKE PARK 51.78 JRNL-CD 5'1,:78 07-0.1 5WENSO'N PARK 5t.78 JRiNL*CD t'0:10 1010 51.78 '~'~'=0'1 THREE POINTS PARK 51.78 JRNL-CD Si'~:78 07"01 TYRONE PARK 7/10/01 7/10/01 51.78 JRNL~CD 7/10/01 7/10/01 51.78 JRNL-CD 1010 VENDOR TOTAL 969a12 709.29 M!SCEL~ANEOUS...!~EMS ......... 0~i~13i~0:.~2:~i,~i0 .... 7/10/0i 7'/i0'/"0i ~0'9,29 JRNL-CD 1010 VENDOR TOTAL 709.29 4,315:. 40 LI {~UO:R 7i-7~0P.~9510 ?/10.!01 7(10!01 .... ~+,3!5,:~0 ,~R..,N.LrCD ............................... 10~0 21674300 1,656.30 LI (~UOR 71-7100-9510 7/10/01 7/10/01 1,656.30 JRNL-CD 1010 2:1617800 72.'0 ..00LI ~U'OR. 7/10Z01 7/10/01. ................... 7~0",0~ ~a~,.C'D · : ioio -8050- PAGE 3 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD · NO,; ~NVOICE NMSR DATE DATE STATUS AMouNT iP·TION 3:41374o0 ,. 7/10/01 7/10/01 185.46 JRNL-CD 101( 34146700 29.05 HISCELLANEOUS 71-7100-9550 BELLBOY CORPORATION VENDOR TOtaL 6906,2.1 B0747 PO7HN0271300 7/10/01 7/10/01 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE VENDOR TOTAL i C0859 D959il 7/10/01 7/10/01 C, HAMPI'O:N AUTO VENDOR TOT:AL C0885 010627 35,00 REIMBURSE EYEGLASSES 7/10i01 7'/i0/01 35~'00 JRNL~CD CHRISTENSON, AMY _- C0970 67215136 VENDOR TOTAL 7/10/01 7;10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 67219120 630.00 06-28-01 CJDN CONNECT CHARGE 01-4140-3800 630.00 JRNL-CD lOl( 630,00 71.34 BRAKE CONTROLLER 01-4280-2310 71.34 JRNL-CD lOlC 101¢ COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST VENDOR TOTAL Cl110 010622-A 7/10/01 7/10/01 35.00 193.12 MIX 1,93.12 JRNL~CD 203.86 MIX 203.86 JRNL-CD 396.98 1,267.33 CURB WORK 1,267.33 JRNL-CD 71'7100-.954,0 71-7100-9540 101( 73-7300-420~ lOlC 010622-8 ~, 267.'33 SID E~A.LK WORK 7/10'/01 7/10/01 1~267.33 J'RNL-CD 101( 010622-C 1,~6'7~4'" ~PRON WORK 7/10/01 7/10/01 1,267.34 JRNL-CD iOlC 'CRETE WORKS INC' D1172 348329 348755 VENDOR TOTAL 3'88'2;6'~ ....................... 1,6.85.70 HEkMETS 7/10/01 7/10/01 1,685"70 '~RNL-C~' 7/10/01 7110101 1,507.77 NOZZEL 1,507.77 JRNL-CD D. ANKO EMERGENCY E~UIPMENT VEN!DOR TOTAL 3193.47 D1200 139115 1,768.45 BEER ?/10/01 7/10/01 1,768.45 JRNL-CD 139124 7/10/01 7/10/01 18.40 MISCELLANEOUS 18.40 JRNL-CD lOlC 22-4170-2200 1.01C 71-7100-9530 lOlO 71-7t00-9550 -8051 - PAGE 4 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE :' NO,' INVOICE NMBR' DATE 139981 ?/i0/0i DUE HOLD DATE 'STATUS' AMOUNT DES!CRiPTiON' 2,99B.00 ..B~R ?/10/0i 2,99~.0'0 JRNL-CD 139988 52.20 MISCELLANEOUS 7/10/0i 7/10/01 52,20 jRNL~CD 140999 1,77.?=,.77 BEER 7/10/01 7/10/01 1,777.77 JRNL-CD 141008 53.70 MISCELLANEOUS 7/10/0i 7/i0/0I 53;70 JR.NE;CD 4,634.85 BEER 4,634.85 JRNL-CD 2:8.50 MISCELLANEOUS . .28.~50 JRNL-:CD 751.10 BEER 751.10 JRNL-CD 4~7.00 BEER 447.00 JR.NL-CD 2,888.75 'BEER 2,888.75 JRNL-CD DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY E1420 103235 VENDOR TOTAL 6~6~,52 7/10/01 7/10/01 103236 7/10101 7/10/01 103812 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/0i 7/10/01 104635 106370 7/10/01 7/10/01 106371 2'8.50 7/10/01 7/10101 28'.50 106936 1,711.65 7/10/01 7/10/01 1,711.65 107797 230.00 7/10/'01 7'/10/01 230.00 110134 4,435.15 7/10/01 7/10/01 4,435.15 110135 53.70 7/10/01 7/10/01 53.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE VENDOR TOTAL 15209.20 E1515 2479 7,525',0D 7/10;01 7/I0/01 7,5~5.00 E-Z RECYCLING INC VENDOR TOTAL 7525.00 F1560 72532 245.96 7/10/01 7/10/0'1 245.9~ 72S33 119..~9 7/i0/01 7/~0/01 119.39 HISCE'SLANEOUS JR. NL'CD BEER JRNL-CD BEER JRNL-CD BEER JRNL-CD BEER JR NL -:C D' 0 6-=01 CURBS IDE JRNL'.CD 2001 ANNUAL JR N 200'1 ANNUAL JRNL-CD RECYCLING SERVICE SERVICE ........ A~ ~:dONT '= NO~ ?i'?~O'O.gS~O' ~10 71-7100-%~j0 101C 71-7100-9550 71-7100-9530 1010 7~-7~00~5:50 . 1010 71-7100-g530 1010 71-71.00~g5~0 71-7100-g530 1010 ?'1~7100-955:0 71-7100-g53o 101o 71~.710'0- 71-7100-g530 iOlO 71~7t00-~530 ........... ~O! o 70~4270;.~-2:0.O 01-4140-2270 ......... ~O-i~ IO1C -8052- PAGE 5 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-Oi CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD :NO, iNVOICE NMB~ DATE ~ATE STATUS AMOUN~ DESCRIPTION 140.24 2001 ANNUAL SERVICE 7/10/01 7/i0/01 140.24 JRNL-CD 195.,52 2.0.Ol ANNUAL SERVICE ~95',:5;3: 2]iO:O1 AN~N'UALSER:vIcE 7/10/01 7/i0/0i 586,'57 ~R.NL,CD 72510 306.39 2001 ANNUAL SERVICE 7'/i0/01 7/i0/01 3~06,39 j~NE~D FIRE CONTROL EXTINGUISHER VENDOR TOTAL I39.B.55 F1732 15499 390.00 THRU 06-28-01 PRO SERVICES 7/10/0i 7/10/01 390..00 JRNL-CD FUTRELL FIRE CONSULT & DE* VENDOR TOTAL 390,00 Gi750 6764~7 27.28 ~06;i9~0i UNiF:ORMS 27.28 06-I9-01 UNIFORMS 27.28 06-19-0~ UNIFORMS 1~35 0:6;~9~0~ 'MA~S 14.35' 06-:!9~Q1 MATS 14,35 06'~9-:01 MATS 683832 25.98 06-26-01 MATS 7/lOZO~ 7ilO/Ol G ..& ~_SERViCES VENDOR TOTAL !,.5~;~:? ,Im G1972 393720 394426 396788 397652 397653 711.50 WINE 7/10/01 7/10/01 711.50 JRNL-CD 402,62 LIQUOR 7110/01 7/~0Z0t ~02.62 JRNL-CD 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10101 01-4340-2330 iOlC 7~', 73 O0 ~4~00 1010 22-4170-2200 01'4190-3100 1010 01-4280-2240 73-7300-2240 78-7800-2240 0'~:~:4 ~ 86'~i~ 5 ~T ~OZO 71-7t00-4210 : 71-7100-9520 iOlO 1,733.36 WINE 71-7100-9520 1,733.36 JRNL-CD 1010 4,798.28 LI NUOR ?~710~-95~0 128.95 WINE 71-7100-9520 ... ,, 7/lo/oi 7/i0/01 i28.95 JRNL-CD ioio ~ GR. IGG5 COOPER & COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 7774.71 i : 7/lO/O1 7/10/01 10.00 JRNL-CD '~HENN CO FIRE' CHIEFS ASSN VENDOR TO~AL ~0~0]'0 22-4170-4130 1010 H2135 21057037 · 4~'.59 05~01 NETWORK SERVICES 01-4095~'~B00 -8053- PAGE 6 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD ", NO., INVOtC. E NMBR DATE DA:TE STATUS 'i-'HE'NNEP'~N"CTY~ INFO TECIt VEN'i)O'R TOTAL 43~'~9 i ....... ~ .~,i .... H2!510!0622 256.80 POSTAL VERIFICATION DREAMWOOD 8i-435o-35io 7/i.o/oi "7/io/oi 25'~80 JRNL~CD :i .... iiOi~ · HEN'NEPIN COUNTY TREASURER VE, ND'OR TOTAL 256.80 · -', H2283 8021273 30.58 LUMBER 7/10/01 7/10/01 30.58 JRNL-CD HOME DEPOT/GECF VENDOR; TOTAL 30.58 01-4280-2300 lOl, I2333 0i0879 ...... 26;7"34.~4 cA'H~RA' SEWER LI~NES 7'8%'~800-500o 7/10/01 7/10/01 26,734.54 JRNL=CD 101. INFRA'TECH VENDOR TOTAL 267'34,~54 [2384 ioo06775 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 1.2400 8141 ISLAND PARK SKELLY J25'7'9 12:6'9420 1272204 7/10/01 7/10/01 10.2.13 BATTERIES 102.13 JRNL-CD 12722'05 VENDOR TOTAL 102.13 7/10/01 7~0/~l 1~0:67.03 REMAN COMPRESSOR 1..,0:6.~.0~ JR.NL,CD VENDOR TOTAL 1067.03 7/10/01 7/10/01 79'2.01 WINE' 79'2~0t JRNL-'CD 7/10/01 7/10/01 373.96 LIeUOR 373.96 JRNL-CD 7/10,/01 7/10101. 1,~06.45 'WI'NE 1.~40'.6,45 JRN.L~CD 29.99 MIX 7/10/01 7/10/01 29.99 JRNL-CD 1272206 01~,4190-3110 71-7100-9'510 101. Jl~ 71-7100-9540 · , 7/10/01 7/10/01 1,062,60 JRNL'CD .:L:J'OHNSON BROTHERS LiNOOR VENDOR TOTAL 3665,0~ ~':L': J2580 264002 K2699 38201-A 382 Oi-B 455.00 WELD GENERATOR TRAILER 78-7800'4200 7/10/0i 7/10/01 455~O0'JRNE"CD VENDOR TO.~AL 455,00 23~.00 05-01 HRA HISCELLANEOUS 01-4110-3100 7/10/01 7/10/01 231.00 JRNL-CD 1011 990.00 05'01 REDEVELOPMENT AREA #1 55-5880]~310:O :: 7/10/0.1 7/10/01 990 O0 JRNL.CD ...... iOi -8054- PAGE ? AP-C02-O1 VENDOR 'NO~' INVOICE NMBR 3B201-C 38201-D PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE DATE STATUS AHOUNT DESCRIPTION .... 33.00 05-01 LANGDON CONDEMNATION 01'4.110.,3100 7/i~/01' 7/10/0i 33,00 3RN:L~CD i01':~ 44.00 05-01 POST OFFICE RELOCATION 55-5879-3100 7/10/01 7/10101 44,00 JRNL-CD 38201~E 727,39 05'01 LONGPRE BLDG PURCHASE ?/10701 ?/Z~i~i ?~7,3~9 ~R'~L'CD ~oYC 38201-F 7/10701 7/10101 38201-G 7/lo/01 38206-A 38206'B 38206-C 38206-D 38206-E 7/10101 7/10/01 ?/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7110101 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/0~ 7/10/01 3820B-F 7/10/01 7/10/01 38206-G 7/10/01 7/10/01 3820~6-H 7/10/01 7/10/01 38206-I 7/10/01 7/10/01 38206-J 38206-K 38206-L 38206-~ 7/10/01 7/10/01 7110/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7110101 7FlO/Oi 711010t VENDOR TOTAL KENNEDY & GRAVEN 44.00 05-01 GRAMERCY CONTRACT 01-2300-1090 44100 JRNL~CD ~'i:61~!~ A~REEMENT . ~i~756010~3100 275.00 JRNL-CD 1010 530.36 05~.01 GRANT APPLICATION 58-5660-3100 530,36 JR NL~"C D ' ~ ~ii!O 30.00 30.00 2,027.36 05-01 LANGDON BAY PROPERTY 2,027.36 JRNL-CD 624.0~ 05-0t BECKER PERMIT REQUEST 624.00 JRNL-CD 447.29 05-01 APT TOWER LEASE 447.29 3RNL-CD 8.5.1a~0 05-01 POLSTON LAWSUIT 851.00 JRNL-CD 1,322.50 05-01 DEDICATED COMMONS 1,322..50 JRNL-CD 3,497.19 05-01 COUNTY ROAD 15 RE~LI~NME 3,497.19 J~'NL-CD 240.00 05-01 ~HONE TOWER LEASE 240.00 JRNL~CD 1,857.70 05-01 EXECUTIVE/CITY COUNCIL 1,857.70 JRNL-CD 642.26 05-01 ADMIN/CITY MANAGER 642.26 JRNL'CD 576.00 05-01 P/Z MISC SERVICES 576.00 JRNL-CD 655.34 6~5.34 1564~.39 05-~01 SCHOOL DISTRICT CLAIM JRNL-CD 1010 01-2300-1095 t010 01-2300-:109'8 1010 · OZ~ZsoOsilZS oi-41io,~iioO lOiO 01-4110-3100 1010 55~5877~'3100 1010 01-2300-1123 ~0,i6 01-4110-3100 1010 01-4110-3100 i~i.O 01-4190.-3100, ~ 1010 05-01 PARKS MISC SERVICES 01-43~0-3100 JRNL-CD ~0~ -8055- PAGE 8 P U R C H A S E J 0 U AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO'.: ~NVO~]~E' N~'BR D~TE bA'i~;E" '" ~i~i' AT ~ SI ..... A~D'U N~ DES~R'IPTi ON 7/10/01 7/10/01 135.43 JRNL-CD R N 5-320026 13.91 V-BELT 7/10/01 7/10~01 13'9! JRNL-C'iD ~.OWE~L'S AUTOMOTIVE/ZITCO~ VENDOR TOTAL 1~9,3~ M3016 9381 79.20 06-01-01 DELIVERY CHARGE 7/10/01 7/10/01 79.20 JRNL-CD 9387 20~.80 06-04-01 DELIVERY CHARGE, 7/10/01 7/10/01 20.8:0 JRNL-CD 9408 109.60 06-07-01 DELIVERY CHARGE 7/10/01 7/10/01 i09.60 JRNL-CD 9420 28..00 06:~14-01 DELIVERY CHARGE ?/10/01 7/10/0'1 28.00 J.R'N.L-CD: 9442 i21.60 06-14-01 DELIVERY CHARGE 7/10/01 7/10/01 121.60 JRNL-CD 9455 32,00 06-18~01 DELIVERY CHARGE 7/~0/0~ 7/10/01 32~0'0 J.RNL~D 9477 97.60 06-21-01 DELIVERY CHARGE 7/10/01 7/10/01 97.60 JRNL-CD A L 01-4340-3o~0 ~010 71-7100-9600 ....... 1010 71-71100-9600 71-7100-9600 lO1C ~i-?100~,~.~00 101C 71-7100-9600 101C 71-7100-9600' i~'~ 71-7100-9600 94'88 7~.2.0 0!6-25-01 DE'LIVER:Y CHARGE 7/1.0/01 7/10101 : 7-20 .... JRN.L-CD . ..... 1:01( 9511 260.00 06-28-01 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9600 7/10/01 7/10/01 260.00 JRNL-CD 101( VENDOR TOTAL 756'.00 3,724.75 BEER 71-7100-9530 7/10/01 3,724.75 JRNL-CD 101( 97.50 BE'E.R 7!~ 7~00-'915~ 7/10/01 97.50 JRN'L-CD !01( 2,692.47 BEER 71-7100-9530 7/10/01 2,692.47 JRNL-CD 101{ 7.i. 7 ~o ~.:~.~-0- · i01( MARLIN'S TRUCKING M3030 290974 7/10/01 290975 7/10/01 ..... 29634~ ....... 7/10/01 · ~, 296'349 ...... 5,S~?j35: BEER' DISTRIBUTOR VENDOR TOTAL i'2092'~07 M3080 36592 448.50 05-01 2001 SEAL COAT PROJECT 01-4280-3100 :~,: 7/%0/0i 7/10701 448'. 5:0 JR'NLi~CD 365'93 2:37~50 05~-Oi. BEA.CHWOOD PO:ND MISCELLA 7/i0/01 7/10/01 237.50 JR~L-CD %"01( -8056- PAGE 9 AP-C02-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO~ INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE S'TATUSi A~OiUNT D~SCRIPTi'ON 7/10/01 7/10/01 5,020.80 JRNL-CD 101( 36595 36596 36597 36598-A 36598-B 36599 36600 3660Z 36602 36603 36604 36605 36606 36607 36608 ?110101 7t10t01 7/10/0i 7/I0/01 7/ZO/O1 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 71t0/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10t01 7110101 7/10/01 7/10/01 7110101 7/10/.01 7/10/01 7110/01 7110/01 7/10101 7110101 7/10/01 7110/01 7110/01 190.00 05-01 WESTEDGE WATERMA.IN BOND 3'D~4280~5~0'~ 190.00 JRN_-¢D 101( 760~00 05-Oi P~I ENGINEERING SERVICES .... 0i~'i~6¥~ib¥ 760.00 JRNL-CD 101( 120.2~ 05-01 P/Z ENGINEERING SERVICES 120.20 J~NL~CD 36609 3661'0 36611 47.50 05-01 ~ATER ENGINEERING SERVIC 47.50 JRNL-CD 73-7300-3100 101( 47.50 05-01 SEWER ENGINEERING SERvic - ~:8~?~0,310~0 47.50 JRNL-CD 168.90' '6'5'-'Oi'6RAMERCY DEVELOPMENT 168.90 JRNL-CD 101( 1,14'6.24 05-01 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 1,146.24 JRNL-CD 12.60 06-01 LOST LAKE CANA_ REHABILI 12.60 JRNL-CD 7~50 05-~1 BECKER ENGINEERING SERVI 76.50 JRNL-CD 306.00 05-01 LOST LAKE ENGINEERING 306.00 JRNL-CD 7.5 - 7'5 o o -~ io '0 IOlC 55-5882-3100 101( 55-5~78-51o-~'- iO1C 2;~91.00 05-01 COUNTY ROAD 15 REALIGNME 55-5877J3i'0~- 2,391.00 JRNL-C.D 10i0 47.50 05-01 TIF DISTRICT ENGINEERING ...... 47.50 JRNL-CD 1010 1,580.60 0"5~0i COAST TO'COAST D'i=ST~'IC$ ....... 55~5'88i~3'~ .... 1,580.60 JRNL-CD iOtO 26~.90 05-01 AUDITOR ROAD ENGINEERING 55-5'~"8323'i'~ .... 263.90 JRNL-CD 1010 2,050.41 05-01 LANGDON BAY ENGINEERING 01-2300-1'09~ ..... 2~050.41 JRNL-CD 1010 791.80 05-01 LANGDON WOODS ENGINEERIN 01-2300-~i~ 7/10/01 7/10/0I 791.80 JRNL-CD lOlO 47.50 05-01 CARLSON SUB'D[VISION 01'~:2300-1:t10 7/10/01 7/10/01 47.50 JRNL-CD 1010 47.50 05-01 HINRICHS SUB-~IVISION 0i-2300'1i~"i"- -8057- PAGE 10 AP-C02-O1 VENDOR · NO, "INVOICE 36612 36613 NMBR PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE DATE STATUS ...... .AMOUNT" DE!SCRIP.¥iON 7/10:/0! 7!'10!0i 4~.50JRNL~.CD 47.50 05-01 HANSSEN SUB-DIVISION 7/10/01 7/10/01 47.50 JRNL-CD 570.00 05~01 HCES LIFT STATION 7/10/01. 7/10/0! 57:0.00 JRNL*:CD 36614 237.50 05-01 MSA ADMINISTRATION ENGIN 7/10/01 7/10/01 237.50 JRNL-CD 36615 4.7.50 05-01 PALMQUIST SUB~DIV~ISION 7/10/01 7/10/0l 47,50 JRNL-£D 36616 448.50 05-01 EXCEL SUB-STATION 7/10/01 7/10/01 448.50 JRNL-CD 36617 190.00 05~01 ECKLUND/BRENSHE'LL SUB'DI 7/10/01 7/10/01 190.00 JRNL~C.D 36618 845.50 05-01 SKATE PARK ENGINEERING 7/10/01 7/10/01 845.50 JRNL-CD 36619 95.00 05-01 RETAINING WALL BOND 7/10/01 7/10/01 95~0.0 JRNL~CD 36620 4,437.00 05-01 DOCK MAP 7/10/01 7/10/01 4,437.00 JRNL-CD 36621 285.00 0:5-01 STREET INYENTOR'Y 7/10/01 7/'1.0/0l 2.85,0'0 36622 313.50 7/10/01 7/10/01 313.50 01-2300- lO1C 78 ' 78 O0 '310:0 1 55-5883-3100 IO1C 01.-.230'0 -111'9 101C 55-5880-3100 101: 01-2300-1t20 1, OlC 55-5880-3100 lO1C 01-4280-3100 81-4350-3100 101[ 01~ 4,280 J:R-NL-CD, , ................. LO1, C 05-01 CODDON SUB-DIVISION 01-2300-1122 JRNL-CD 101[ 36623 665.00 05-01 VOICE 7/1'0/0t 7/1,0:/0t 665.00 JRNL-C:D 36624 95.00 05-01 WELL 7/10/01 7/10/01 95.00 JRNL-CD SIREAM AN'TENNiS Ot~2300- AND PUMPHOUSE 73-7300-3100 101( 36625 475.00 05-01 L.ONGPRE BLDG DEMO 55-5880-31.010 7/10/01 7/10/01 475..00 JRNL-CD ..... ~.0~( 366~6 ~4~.50 05-01 KELLS ROAD VACATION 01-4190-3100 7/10/01 7/10/01 142.50 JRNL-CD 101~ 36627 258.70 05-01 PEDERSON VARIANCE 0~4190-'3100 7/10/01 7/10/01 258.70 JRNL-CD 101( MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI* VENDOR TOTAL 24955.65 M3083 743684 32..05 BLANKET 7/10/01 7/10/01 32.05 JRNL'CD lO'lC -8058- PAGE AP-C02-O1 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD "NO;. iNVOiCE NHBR DATE ~.AY-E~ STA:TD$ AMOUNT DES£RIPTION 82.65 ..... 7/iOZOl t5 HATRX HEDICAL INC. VENDOR TOTAL N317i 9O 66 117 13 7/10/!01 16,00 01~18.01 LUNCHEON Z6,OO JRNLJCD 1~.00 0~15-01 ~UNCHEON 7/10/01 7/10/01 16.00 JRNL-CD i6~:00 03-:i5:~01 LUNCHEON 16,00 JRNL-CD 7/10/01 7;10/:01 010626 ~ 7/lo/o~ 7/to/ol , o~o7~o ~ ~ 7/10/01 7110101 ~METRO WEST INSPECTION SER~' VENDOR TOTAL .M32~8 0~0702 ?/~O/o~ 7/~i0~ i, HINNETONKA CRIHE PREVENTA~ VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 IS~O~O~-19;OZ LUNCHEON 7/10/01 7/10/01 -~.00 JRNL-CD 52.5D THRU 05-29-01 INSPECTIONS 52.50 JRN:L'CD Z,ZiO.O0 06"OZ'INsPEcTiONS 1,110.00 JRNL-CD 1226,50 75,0.0~ 20:0~ K~9 TRIALS 75.00 JRNL-CD 01-4040-4120 lOlC 01-4040-4120 01-4190-3100 i01¢ OI,,A~4,0-AiO'D 101C ~ MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED VENDOR TOTAL 63.76 ;470 83766 72~50 'CO'LIFM:R HF'WATER (lO) 7/10/0~ 7/~0/01 72,50 JRNL-CO . 'MN VALLEY TESTING LABORA~O' VENDOR TOTAL .... 72.5~ ~ M3490 0~0702 ~0,547.25 06-01 SALARIES 22-4170-1390 7!0,0006~0~ DRILLS ~ 1,250,00 06~01 MAINTENANCE 7/10!01 7/10/01 12'507'25JR:NL~C:D ~' i MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT VENDOR TOTAL 12507.25 j ..... ?/10/01 ?/~0101 8~823,33 JRNL-CD .. MOUND' FiRE RELIEF ASSN VENDOR TOY'AL 8823~33 ,i. N3737.. 010710 . 35.90 06-01 #16 JOHNSON, TIM 01-4280-3220 ~'~ 35,90 06~0:1 #~8 HARDI'NA:, DAMON 78.7800~:3220 :i 35.90 06~01 #19 KIVI'STO, SCOTT 7B~780i0-3220: ~S~:9o -8050- PAGE 12 AP-C02-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD ~,i NO~""iNvoI'CE NMBR~ DATE ........ DATE ..... ~TATUS AM'OONT' D'ESCiR'IpTION 35.90 06-01 #22 HEITZ, DON 01-4280- ' 35.90 06-01 #23 KESTNER, AL 73-7300-_ ii.. '. 33.13 612-221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 01-4280-3220 ~'! 73.90 612-221-6813 HOFF, KATIE 81-4350-3220 '" 35.89 612-221-6814 RAHN, JODI 01-4040-3220 11.96 612-22~-6822 NELSON, JOYCE 01-4280-3220 11.96 612-221~6822 NELSON, JOYCE · 76.82 61~-~82-5889 SUTHERLAND, JON 01-4190-3~0 60.39 612-363-5883 NORLANDER, JILL 0~-4190-3220 7(10/01 7/10/01 838.10 JRNL-CD 101[ ..- NEXTEL CONHUNIC.AT'I:ONS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 83~.1fl "~374'6'142~A Z;5'~9:"00 'iNStALLATION oF'DOcKs 81-4350-4~00 2Z,350.62 DOCK CONTRACT 8~-4350-5000 7/10/01 7/10/01 23,869.62 JRNL-CD 101C 1450' 856.00 INSTALL DOCKS 8~-43'5'0-42'00 NICCUM DOCKS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 24725.~2 N3748' 0t'062'2] ' .... SO.O0 REIM'BURS:EMENT EYE EXAM 01':A~;gg-'~;~i~ ....... 7/1.'0/01 7/10/0l 50..00 JRNL'CD i0~.C NORLANDER, JILL VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 N3750 1520 7/10101 7/1.OJO1 NORTH M~MORIAL HEALTH CARE V~N~O:R..TOTA,L ~O.OO p4ooo 7iisssi2 185.07 MIX 7/~0/01 7/10/01 185.07 JRNL-CD P. EPSI~COLA COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 185.07 40.00 01-16-01 THRU 03-27-01 BERENT/ 22-4170-~''0 ~0.-0:~ .... J'R'NL-C:D 71-7100-9540 101C .... P'~021 7315'80 7/10/01 7/10/01 294.45 JRNL-CD iOlC 731581 7~6;95 WINE 71-7100~952'0 ..... 7/10/01 7/10/01 7.4-6..~5 J'RNL-CD lOiO 731582 ...... 147;'60 MISCELLANEOUS '71-7100-955'~ 7/10/01 7/10/01 147.60 JRNL-CD 101C 733686 7/10/01 7/1.0/01 1,592.95 JRNL-CD 10~ 733687 1,689.75 WiNE 71-7100-9526 ...... -8060- PAGE 13 AP-C02-O1 VENDOR INVOICE NO, INVOICE NMSR DATE 733689 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND DUE HOLD DATE STATUS AMOUNT 7/10/01 7110/01 733690 Zlio./Oi PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS, * VENDOR TOTAL 7/io/oi 7110/01 P4038 43982 44286 232.65 232.65 136.00 i36.oo 4840.35 WINE ?i-7i00-9520 JRNL-CD ~O.i( MIX: ~l~?loo~gS~io .JRNL~CD i:O:~,( 1;!608,34' CIGARETTES 1,608.34 JRN.L-CD 74.80 CIGARS ?/iO/Oi 7/10/01 74.80 JRNL-CD 44287 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING VENDOR TOTAL ~417i 003609-00 006218-00 00636.6'00 006367-00 i,i29.41 CIGARETTES 1,I29~41 JRNL-CD 2812.55 100.08 MISCELLANEOUS ?/lO/O1 7/10/01 10o.08 JRN:L-GD 3,756.89 LI~:UOR ?/10/01 7/i0i01 3,?S~:a~ i,382.09 LIQUOR 5~'559.:80 Li~UOR 190.40 MIX 7/10/01 7/10/01 190.40 JRNE-CD 7i-7100-9550 101( 101~ 0067~7-00 20.0i LIQUOR 7/10/0i 7/lO/01 20.O1JRNL~CD &' SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL 12191,89 ~ R4199 010628 434.38 DEPOT RECP 7/10/01 7/10/01 434.38 JRNL-CD ~!!!~! R~C:, ELECTRIC, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 434.38 ...i R42'09 16~2 114-54 ' 06-01 TRASH SERVICE ~i,'~i 7/10/01 7/10101 114.54 JRNL-CD ~i.('R~NDY'S'SANiTATION ' VENDOR TOTAl 1i~,5~ 71-7100-9550 7t-71::00~95~0 iOlC 71-7100-9510 iOlC 71-7100-9540 006663-00 1,182.62 WINE ~1':7100,~S2.01 7/10/01 7/10/01 1,i8'2.'62 JRNL'CD lOlC 71-7100-9510 ~0'~'~ 01-4340-2330 iOlC 01-4320-3750 lOiC ?/10/0i' 7/10/01 26.56 05'15'0I THRU 05-23'01 FINAL R 55~-5883~500.0 26.56 JRNL-CD lOlO -8061 - PAGE 14 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD ..... NB::. iNVOi¢:E'~Nt~BR D~TE" .... I~TE: '~"S'T:A~FUS R~['~ANT ENERGY VENDOR" t~OYAL S43!1 1 1,305.25 TRAINING CLASSES 6.52 ~ 6:3 TRAINING CLASSES 78"7800~310~ ?/~0/0~ 7/~0/0~ 3~.00 JRNL-CD ~0~0 5AFEASSURE CONSULTANTS ZNC VENDOR TOTAL 54349 02-2021266 4'8,44 BLADE ,: SCHARBER & SONS 54:380 0~.0 625 54391 3398 34'09 3410 VENDOR TOTAL 48.44 ~92.88 6136 EVERGREEN REMOVE TREE 01-4140-5i10 7/i0/01' 7/IoZoi ~91~88 JRN[~CD 'i :i~:~:~iTO ?/io/oi 7/10/01 670.95 JRNL-CD lOlC 60i.73 APTS ON ilo REMOVE TREES oi-434o-silO 7/!0:/o~. ' ?:/io/oi 54434 94966MB 0106i8 010622 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA CONSTR* VENDOR TOTAL S'~4 S8 O' '6902 7/10/01 7/10/01 6919 6920 ' ............ 7061. 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/io<oi 7/10/01 7/10/01 45.00 06-11-01 BRUSH DISPOSAL 01-4280-4200 45.00 JRNL-CD lOlO i5,.00 06~8-01 BRUSH DISPOSAL ~5 ~0..0 JRNL~c'~ 18.75 06-22-01 BRUSH DISPOSAL 01-4280-4200 18.75 JRNL-CD 1010 7B~75 . 2'615;76 GE'N'E~A~'O~' ~'IF"T"~A¥iON 2,615.76 JRNL-CD 101C ~/10/01 7/10./01 184.2!3 JRN'L,cD iO~O 7/10/01 7/10/01 288.00 JRNL-CD iOlO 7/t0/01 7/10~01 25?,20 JR'NL~,CD -8062- PAGE 15 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS 7/10/01 7/t0/01 'ERNE ELECTRIC CO VENDOR TOTAL ~ $4630 010708 7'/'t0/01 7/10f01 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION t'468.22JRNL'CD 4813.41 645.23 THRU '0<6-21~0i GASOLINE 'CHAR,GE'S 645.2] JRNL-CD 101I SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC VENDOR TOTAL 645.23 54631 010718 1.305.01 THRU 06-21-01 GASOLINE CHARGES. 01-4140-3220 7/10/~1 7/i076i 1,305.'0.i JR'~L':CD SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC VENDQR TOTAL S4632 010718 7/10/0i 7/i0/01 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC VENDOR TOTAL 596.03 ~S4650 010625 44.95 7/10/01 7/i0/01 44.95 SWENSEN, JASON VENDOR TOTAL 44.95 T4703 01~06~5 25.00 7/10/01 7/10/0i 25.00 T-CHEK SYSTEMS LLC T4730 6521 7237 LAKER T4770 197125 .......... [97659- '' 198069 229618 ......... 230353 230345 231082 VENDOR TOTA_ 25.00 270.00 7/10/01 7/10/01 270.00 112.50 7/10/01 7/10/01 112.50 VENDOR TOTAL ~82.50 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7110/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 7/10/01 13,05.01 596.03 THRU 06-21-01 GASO_INE CHARGES 596.03 JRNL-CD COLLAR JRNL-CD O6-'01 WEB'-SITE JRNL-CD THRU 0.6-16-'0i MAINTENANCE JRNL-CD THRU 06-23-01 OFFICER POSITION JRNL-CD 556.00 BEER 556.00 JRNL-CD 240~00 '~EER 240.00 JRNL-CD 282.00 BEER 282.00 JRNL-CD 520.00 ' BEER 520.00 JRNL~CO 5~169.50 BEER 5~169.50 JRNL-CD 63.10 BEER 6~.10 JRNL-CD 25.10 MISCELLANEOUS 22-4170-3220 01-4140-4100 10lC 0i-~320-3,~00 101{ 73-7300-35~0 .~Olt 01-4140-3410 IOlC 71-7100-9530 lOlC ................ 7i;~ii~.O~-~:~ ...... iOZC 101( 10t[ - 7i-~i06,)5~'~~'- 7ia. 7100~:~3'0 -8063- PAGE 16 AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD ND~'i' iNVO'ICE::'NMBR ..... DXTE' DAYE'~'ATU'S: AMDUNT''~E~iCR'I]:~¥ioN 7~0t0i 7!1:0/0~i 2=5.,i.Q J.RNL.¢D 231083 7/10/01 7/10/01 THORPE DISTRIBUTING C:OMPAN VENDOR TOTAL 74855 T~ii2223 7/10/01 7/10/01 'TOMAHAWK LIVE TRAP COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL T~951 08'3597 TRUE VALUE 74965 284331 7/10/01 7/10/01 VENDOR TOTAL 7/10/01 7/10/01 THYSSEN LAGER@UIST ELEVATO VENDOR TOTAL U5050 7:8609 80244 UNI.'FORM5 UN:LIMITED W51.492 01071.0 7110101 7110101 7/10/01 7/10/01 VENDOR' TOTAL P U R C H'A S E J O U R N A L 7/10/01 7/10/01 WEST METRO BUILDING M.AINT. VEND:OR TOTA~L W5630 4430 WIDMER INC ,~ W5670 48XY 11,079.35 BEER 71-7100- J 11,079.35 JRNL=CD 101( WILLIAMS TOWING Z6620 010628 179~5.05 174.49 LIVE TRAP 01-4140='427'6-' 174.49 JRNL-CD 101( 4.69 WIRE CABLE CLAMPS 0i-434.0~2~2:00 4.69 JRNL-CD 101( 4.69 153.84 07~'01 ELEVATOR SERVI.CE 0i~4320"-42.00 153.84 JRNL"CD 1,01, 153.84 7.86 NAME TAGS 01-4150-224-0 7.86 JRNL-CD 101~ 12.04 INSIGNIA'S 22-4170-2'20'0-' 12.04 JRNL-CD 101( 19.9'0 1:,320.60 0.7~01 gLEAN:lNG 110.05 07-OI~[EANING oi"'4~ob'-W~'66 110.05 07-01 CLEANING 73-7300-4200 110.05 07-01 CLEANING 78-7800-4200 1.,65.0.75 JR. NL-C:D ~i:'~ 1650.75 435.00 06-08-01 REPLACED STAND PIPE 73-7300-3800 7/10/01 7/10/01 435.00 JRNL-CD 101( VENDOR TOTAL 435.00 ioi.i8 o6-1o-oi, i7oo COMMERCE 6'114i40-~2'~d 7/10/01 7/10/01 101.18 JRNL-CD 101( 488'51 ioi.l~ OS-DJ-DJ TOW ..... O.~','~'~J~'~ ...... 7/1.0/01 7/10/01 101.18 JR. NL-CD 101( VENDOR TOTAL 202.36 ...... 7110/0I 7110/0'1 HERZENACH, DAVID VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 REFUND DOCK FEE 81-3260-0000 150.00 JRNL~CD ........................... i~'t 1,5 0.0 0 -8064- PAGE 17 P U R C H A S E J 0 AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD ' ~ N~ ~" ~ NV;Q i'VE ' 'NMB R OATE~ AM O'U NY D'ESCR Ip:T I O.N Z.66:5:4. 0i0627 . 150,.OQ ..... REE~ND.,DOCK FEE ?/i0/01 ?/10/01 150.00 JRNL-CD THOMAS VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 ~ Z6835 010702 34=0'0 RE'iMBURSE POSTAGE 7!~0/01:7/10f0~ .............. 3.4,00 JRNL,CD ~ WEIST, KATHY VENDOR TOTAL 34.00 50.00 e. 7fi0/01 7110/01 50.00 BOSHA~ ROBERT :~ Z6968 14661 U R N A L PAWS DEPOT Z6969 010710 O10710-B 010710-C 101( JRNL'CD : 10111{ VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 7/10/01 7110101 VENDOR TOTAL i02.40 PET WAGONS 0i-4i40-4270 i02.40 JRNL-CD l~i( 102.4,0 286.98 THRU 05-02-01 952-472-3711 LON 0t-4140-3220 7/10/01 7/10/01 256.98 JRNL-CD 101( 338.57 THRU 03'20-01 952-472-0600 LON 0.1-4320-3220 7/~0/0~ 33.8.57 JRNL-£D 98.90 THRU 03-20-01 952-472-125i LON 01-4280-3220 98.90 THRU 03-20-01 952-472-125~ LON 73-7300-3220 :'~98.90 THRU 0~20-01 952-472-1251 LON ?.8-7,800~2~ 296.70 JRNL~CD 101( 7/10/01 ~OTAL ..... 922'.25 7/10/01 7/lOZOi VERIZON LONG DISTANCE VENDOR TOTAL ALL VENDORS 246,516.43 -8065- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 260:00 AND 260:10 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION The City of Mound does ordain: Section 260:00 is amended to read as follows:* Section 260:00 ' Commission Deactivated. The Economic Development Commission for the City of Mound, (the'"EDC"), established on February 21, 1989, is hereby deactivated, effective on June 12, 2001, subiect to reactivation by resolution of the Council. Any such resolution reactivatin.q the EDC shall also make the member appointments: Section..260;._!0,is amen.ded t~ read as.follows: Section 260:10. Composition. The EDC shall consist of seven members. Six members shall be appointed by the City Council and any member may be removed by a four-fifths vote of the Council; the Council shall select one member of the council to serve on the Commission from among the Councilmembers, and said Councilmember to be appointed for one year, commencing in January of each year; the City Manager shall be a member of the Commission ex-officio and without vote. oh~,, ~,.,,;.,~ n .... k.~. o~ ~ aaa. ~,.~ ,,,,,, ~,, .~v,.,;..~ n~,,..~,~,,~, o~ ~ oo~ On the terms of the members first appointed followin,q reactivation, two appointments shall be until the first December 31 that is at least six months from such appointment, two until the se~nd December 31, and two until the third December 31. The successors shall be appointed for terms of three years. Both the original and successive appointees shall held their offi~ until their successors are appointed and qualified unless removed by four-fifths vote of the City Council. The term of ex-officio member shall correspond with their respective office tenures. Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the Council for the un-expired portion of the term. Every appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of his or her office. All members shall serve without compensation, but may be reimbursed for actual expenses if funds therefore are provided in the adopted City budget. (ORD. #36-1989, 10/30/89) -8066- Ordinance No. The qualifications of the members of the Commission shall be those who, in the judgment of the Council, are representative of the community and are qualified by training and experience and interest useful for the fulfillment of the Commission's responsibility in economic development, Attest: Bonnie Ritter Acting City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -8067- TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MICHAEL MUELLER RE: DON SCHERVEN MEMORIAL PARK Possible dates that the family has chosen for the Don Scherven Memorial Park Ceremony are Saturday, August 11th or Saturday, August 25th. Please choose a date that works best for those wishing to attend. Also, please coordinate with Jim Fackler regarding a good clean-up of the park and to have the new sign ready to be installed. Sincerely, Michael Mueller -8068- COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City of Mound for Local Water Planning and Regulation This Cooperative Agreement is made this day of ,2001'by and between the ~fmnehaha Creek Watershed District, a watershed district with purposes and powers as set forth at Minnesota S .tamtes Chapters 103B and 103D ("MCWD"), and the City of Mound, a body corporate and politic aM a [home role charter/statutory] city in the State of~finnesota ("City"). Recitals and Statement of Purpose WHEREAS in 1997, the MCWD revised its comprehensive watershed manag~aent plan under Minnesota Statues § 103B.231, which details the existing physical environment, land use and development ha the watershed and establishes a plan to regulate water resource use and management to protect water resources, improve water quality, prevent flooding and otherwise achieve the goals of Mirmesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D; .................. ~AS---the--MeWD's-eomprehensive watershed' management plan incorporates the Rules adopla~d by the MCWD to protect water resources, improve water quality, prevent flooding and otherwise achieve the goals of~esota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D; ~RE.~_~the Ci~ has developed a local Statutes § 103B,235 that describes the existing and proposed physical envimmnent and land use within the City aM se~s fo~h aa implement~ion plan for bringing local water management into conformance wi~h the MCWD's comprehensive watershed management plan; WHEREAS on May t, 2001, the MCWD Board of Managers conditiOnally apPrOved the City's local water management plan by adoption of Resolution 06.2001, which resolution is agmehed avat hacoq~oratod homin; WHEREAS the May 1, 2001 local plan approval was condition on fulfillment of the terms fo~h in Re~lmion 06,2~l; ~~ the City within 120 days ofex~cution.ofthis Cooperative Agreement will adopt aM implement it~ ~ water management plan mad within 180 days will adopt all ordinances i~fied in l~mlmion ~2:001 as n~eessary for the Board of Managers' finding that the City's official ~ ~ a~ lamt~ive of the water resource as the MCWD's; ~RE~, the MCW~ and City dele to memorialize their respective roles in i.mptememhag water resource protection and management within the City; NOW TI4E~ORE it is mutually a~eed by and between the parties that they enter into rials Cooperative ~eemeat in order to document the understanding of the parties as to the roles and responsibilities of oaeh party. MU2~04 -8069- 1.0 Responsibilities of the City 1.1 The City may exercise all present and future authority it otherwise may possess to issue permits for mad regulate activities affecting water resources within the City. 1.2 The City is solely responsible for erosion control, flood plain alteration, wetland protection and stormw .~ management for land development within the City. The City will regulate these activities in accordance with the City's approved local water management plan and the temas of fbis Agreement. The MCWD will cont'mue to exercise its, regulatory authority with respect to alt other subjects of regulation under its Rules. 1.3 On written co .afirmation to the MCWD that the City has adopted erosion control, flood plain altera~ wetland prote~ion and stonnwater management for land development ordinances as required by Resolution 06-2001 and said ordinanc~es are in force, the City shall become solely responsible for erosion consol, flood pl~.ain alteration, wetland protection and stormwa~er management for land development within the City. The City will implement the ordinances in ~cordance with the City's approved local water management plan and the terms of this Agreement. 1.4 Within 120 days of-its r~ipt' of the MCWD's wetland inventory and' function & value assessment for the City, the City sh~l review its local water management plan, submit to the MCWD such revisions as the City believes warranted by the new information. refi~renced o~dimnce until the MCWD has approved the variance and proposed conditions. On receipt of a request for a variance, the City promptly will transmit a copy of the variance request and supposing documentation to the MCWD for review. 1.6 The City will maintain a logof permits it grants pursuant to this A~eement, will provide the log ~o ~e MCWD amauatly and will meet at least ammally with the MCWD to review the implementation of the Cky's loc, al water management plan. 2.0 ~ooa~bilities ofthe.~ Z1 ~ MCWD will continue to ap. ply and enforce MCWD Rules E, F, and G "dredging, fl~oe,~ and m'eamb.~ improvements, and ~ream and lake crossings," within the City, 2.2. ~ MCWD wilt contac to apply and enforce MCWD Rules B, C, D and N, "erosion eo~ ~ plain alteration, wetland prot~ion and stormwater mmaagement for land ~.-vel~Nmae~" within~ .~. City until the conctitions in Paragraph 1.3 have been met. 2,3 2.4 ~ ~~ will coatimae to apply and enforce Rule I, "Variances," when considering a valance, ~om aa abov~'efereaeed City o~dinance, The MCWD will act on a variance request p.m~tum~ t to .Pau~raph 1.5 within 30 days of its receipt of the request. ~ MC~ will pe~rm a wetland inventory and a funCtion & value assessment for the ~-and,wi~}l provide the gemtts to' the City. CLL-199~ MLr2204 -8070- 2.5 The MCWD will exercise good faith in its review and approval of any revision submitted by the City in accordance with paragraph 1.4, above. 2.6 The MCWD will meet with the City at least annually to review the implementation of'the City's local water management plan. 2,7 The MCWD reta~ the fight to enforce any and all of its rules in the event that the City is unable or unwilling to carry out its obligations listed in Section 1.0 of this Agreement. 2.8 The MCWD retains all authority that it may possess under Minnesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D or any other provision of law, except as explicitly reposed in the City under this Agreement, including but not limited to authority set forth in Minnesota Statutes §§ 103B.21 I, ~ubd. l(a); 103D,335 and 103D.341. 3.0 Conditions The City's lOcal water management plan shall be deemed finally approved by the MCWD on the City's fulfillment of paragraph 1.3 above. 4.0 Amendment This Agreement may be mended only by a writing signed by both of the parties. CITY OF MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By: By: Mayor President, Board of Managers c~ ~er ~P, RO~ ~ TO FO~ AND E~CUTtON APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION By: By: It, s A~maey Its Attorney -8071 - CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350:505 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO ADMINISTRATION OF THE ZONING CODE The City of Mound does ordain: Section 350:505 is amended to read as follows: Administration of Zonin,q Code. The Director of Community Development ~hall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of this Code, and the implementation and enforcement of the Comprehensive Plan. The Director of Community Development shall create and maintain such systems of records and files and establish such administrative procedures as are necessary to promote the efficient administration and enforcement of this Code and the Comprehensive Plan. The Director of Community Development may desi,qnate additional persons as may be necessary or convenient to administer and enforce this Code. Any person a,q,qrieved bY any procedure or decision of the Director of Community Development maY'appeal to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. In addition to the fore,qoin,q, the Director of Community Development or individuals actin,q under that person's direction shall have the followin,q responsibilities: Subd. 1. Issue o~upancy, building and other permits and make and maintain records thereof. Subd. 2. Conduct inspections of buildings and use of land to determine compliance with the terms of this erdiP, aFm~ Code. Subd. 3. Maintain permanent and current records of this ~ Code, including but not limited to: All maps, amendments, and special uses, variances, appeals and applications therefore. Subd. 4. Receive, file, and forward all applications for appeals, variances, special uses or other matters to the designated official bodies. Subd. 5. Institute in the name of the City, any appropriate actions of proceedings against a violator.... .... ~,...,.......'-";'~"~ ~'""....,. of this code or applicable statute. Subd. 6. Commission. Se~e as an ex-officio non-voting member of the Planning Passed by the City Council of the City of Mound this 10th day of July, 2001. Attest: Bennie Ritter, ~ing City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -8072- ,~ ZONING CODE Section 350:505. Administration of Zoning Code. The Director of Community Development shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of this code, and the implementation and enforcement of the Comprehensive Plan. The Director of Community Development shall create and maintain such systems of records and files and establish such administrative procedures as are necessary to promote the efficient administration and enforcement of this code and the Comprehensive Plan. The Director of Community Development may designate additional persons as may be necessary or convenient to administer and enforce this code. Any person aggrieved by any procedure or decision of the Director of Community Development may appeal to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. In addition to the foregoing, the Director of Community Development or individuals acting under that person's direction shall have the following responsibilities. Subd. 1 Issue occupancy, building and other permits and make and maintain records thereof. Subd. 2. Conduct inspections of buildings and use of land to determine compliance with the terms of this Code. Subd. 3. Maintain permanent and current records of this Code, including but not limited to: all maps, amendments, and special uses, variances, appeals and applications therefore. Subd. 4. Receive, file, and forward all applications for appeals, variances, special uses or other matters to the designated official bodies. Subd. 5. Institute in the name of the City, any appropriate actions of proceedings against a violator of this code or applicable statute. Subd. 6. Serve as ex-officio non-voting member of the Planning Commission. JBD-196280vl MU220-2 -8073- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com July 5, 2001 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: KANDIS HANSON BONNIE RITTER ETHICS GUIDELINES At the workshop with the Commissions regarding ethics guidelines, it was perceived that the intent was to eliminate the Financial Disclosure Statement for members of Boards and Commissions. The enclosed Ethics Guidelines for City Council and Advisory CommiSsions has been revised to eliminate the Financial Disclosure Statement for Board and Commissions, however State Statute does allow the City to collect this information from elected officials. I'm enclosing copies of Roseville, Blaine and Minnetonka's policies regarding this subject. CITY OF MOUND ETHICS GUIDELINES FOR CITY COUNCIL AND ADVISORY COMMISSIONS BACKGROUND: The Mound City Council makes the following findings: 1. The confidence that the community has in its public institutions is directly related to the standards followed by the elected and appointed officials. Not only is it important that elected and appointed officials act ethically in their public lives; but it is equally important that they establish and follow clear principles and guidelines to guide them in their a~ions. The existence and adherence to such guidelines can result in a high level of public trust and acceptance in the actions of elected and appointed officials. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council has adopted the following Ethics Guidelines, to be observed and followed by the City Council and the members of the advisory commissions of the City, (collectively, "Officials"). ETItlCS GUIDELINES: (Per State Statutes: 471.87; 412.311; 471.895; and 471.705) No Official shall misuse the office to secure special privileges or exemptions for such person or any other person. No Official shall directly or indirectly receive or agree to receive or solicit, any compensation, git~, reward or gratuity in payment for the performance of his or her official duties except as may be provided by law; nor shall any Official give or offer to give any compensation, gift, reward or gratuity to any individuals in connection to their official capacity. o No Official shall enter into any contract with the City that is prohibited by law. Any public official who has a proprietary interest in an entity doing business with the City shall make known that interest in writing to the City Council and the City Clerk. Any Official, who in the discharge of said Official's duties would be required to take an action or make a decision which would substantially affect such official's financial interest or those of a business with which such official is associated (except as the City's representative), unless the effect on such official is no greater than on any other citizens or other members of such official's business classification, profession, or occupation, shall not participate in either discussion or vote on the matter, and shall additionally take the following actions: -8075- A written statement shall be prepared which will include the name, address, office held, action presenting the potential conflict of interest, the nature of the financial interest, the person notified of the potential conflict of interest, the member's signature and the date; b. Said member shall deliver copies of the statement to the City Clerk; Co If a potential conflict presents itself and there is insufficient time to comply with the provisions of clauses "a" and "b" of this section, the member shall verbally inform the City Clerk of the potential conflict. The Official shall then file a written statement with the City Clerk within one weekatter the potential conflict presents itself which statement shall state the reason for the delay. The provisions of this paragraph 4 should not, absent unusual circumstances, prevent the Official from appearing before the City Council or any commission on a matter where such Official is, as property owner, requesting some action or decision from the City on such property, providing that such participation is as a member of the public and not as an Official. An Official must not act as an agent or attomey for another before the City Council or a commission in a matter where a conflict of interest exists or may exist. An Official may accept compensation or expense reimbursement for the performance of the Official's public duties op. ly from the sources listed below. a. Compensation and expenses paid by the City. bo Compensation and expenses from other employment, if the person happens to conduct public business while being paid for the other employment and if the other employment does not interfere with, influence, or compromise the person's public position, and Compensation and expenses paid by another governmental agency or municipal association to an Official who serves as a City representative for that agency, but only if the City does not also pay the person for the same activity. An Official must not use public money, time, personnel, facilities, or equipment for private gain or ~:itical campaign activities except when: a. the use is required or authorized by law, or b. t~ use is no greater than that allowed for the general public. Ss p~a~aph does not prohibit correspondence at any time to individual residents in response to the rem'dent's specific inquiries, or general surveys of residents that are conducted before the tim of filing for candidacy for elective office. JBD-lg~3glv2 ML~20-1 -8076- It is important to public confidence in the operation of government that decisions of the City Council and the advisory commissions of the city (unless subject to certain specific exceptions) be made in public, following discussion among members also taking place in public. For that reason, the following guidelines will be followed by Officials: ao At any gathering that is attended by a majority of the Council, or of an advisory commission ( unless such gathering has been duly noticed as a meeting of the Council or such advisory commission), such Officials will refrain from participating, as a group, in any discussion, either between the members, or others in attendance at the gathering, involving matters that are pending, or are likely to come before the Council or such advisory commission. bo At any special meeting of the Council or of an advisory commission, the Officials will refrain from engaging in discussion or taking action on any matter which was not contained on, or reasonably related to, the items in the meeting notice. The Council and each advisory commission will, from time to time, and at the recommendation of the City Manager, conduct study sessions to familiarize new Officials and update other Officials with the requirements of the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. While openness is an important comerstone of good government, it is occasionally necessary to limit disclosure of certain types of data that may come into the hands of Officials. For that reason, Officials will become familiar with the requirements of the Minnesota Data Practices Act, and will seek advice prior to disclosing data in their possession that might be considered as not public. Further, an Official must not disclose information received, discussed, or decided in conference with the City Attorney that is protected by the attomey/client privilege, unless a majority of the City Council has authorized that disclosure. I hereby acknowledge and will uphold these ethics guidelines as provided under Minnesota Statute. Signatui'e Date JBD-185381v2 MU220-1 -8077- City of Mound Financial Disclosure Statement Within 30 days after taking the oath of office or being appointed to a position, each Council member must file a report with the City Clerk on a form prepared by the clerk, which contains the information specified below for the preceding year. Thereafter, each person shall file a supplemental report on the first day of February of every year and within 30 days of any change in information provided in the disclosure. The information shall be for the individual, the individual's spouse, and all minor children (collectively referred to below as "you"). Nanle Address City State Zip Office phone I Home phone 1. List any business entity in which you are an officer, director, member, or employee, and the position held. 2. List any business entity in which you have an ownership interest, either legal or equitable. List name and address of each entity from which you receive income, compensation, fees, or commissions for employment, for services rendered, or from pensions, except the employment, services rendered or pensions of minor children. JBD- 188004v 1 MU220-2 -8078- 4. List all non-profit organizations in which the person is a member or serves on the governing body, and the positions held, except if serving in that capacity as the City's representative. 5. List all real property within the City owned by you or in which you have a beneficial interest. Signature Date JBD- 188004v 1 MU220-2 -8079- EXTRACT OF MINI3TES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 23rd day of July, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. The following members were present: Johnson, Maschka, Thomas, and Rog, and the following were absent: Cushman. Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NOt 8593 CODE OF ETEICS FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN TEE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ~ WHEREAS, it is imperative that the officials in the public service not oqly maintain the highest possible standards of ethical conduct in 'their transactions of public business, but that such standards be clearly defined and known to the public as well as Go the public officials;, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ROSEVILLE-that the following be a Code of Ethics for the public officials of Rose- ville. Section !. Deciarat~°n of Poiicv. The proper operation of democratic government requires that public officials be independent, impartial and responsible to the people; that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the government structure; that public office not be used for personal gain; and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government. In recognition of these goals, there is hereby established a Code of Ethics for all Public officials of the City of Roseville. The purpose of this Code is to establish ethical standards of conduct for all such officials by setting forth those acts or actions that are incompatible with the best .interests of the city, and by directing disclosure by suck officials of private financial or other interests in matters affecting the city. The provisions and purpose of this. Code and such rules and regulations as may be established are hereby declared to be in the-best interests of the City of Roseville. Recognizing that education on ethics in government is the key to having good government, this code requires that yearly seminars be held to discuss'the meaning of this code with new public officials, and in addition such seminars shall involve trained experts on govern- ment ethics that are outside of ~he Roseville government itself. The city Manager shall be the coordinator for these seminars. These seminars will keep the'subject of ethics in government fresh in every- one's mind. -8080- Resolution No. 8593 Pa~'~ ~ 0 section 2. Definitions of Terms. '~] Public officia~ Any person that has been elected to office, appointed .by the City Council, appointed to a City board or commission,, _ ~ ~°r hired by the City head assistant head. to serve as a department or aepar~menu This list includes the following: a. A member of the City Council and Mayor. b. The department head and assistant department head of each City department. c. A member of any city board or commission. d. The city Manager. e. The city Attorney and attorneys, in the City Attorney's firm performing work for the city. f. Any other person hired as a consultant or designated by the city Council from time to time to handle City matters. Anythinq of Value Money, real or personal property, a permit or license, a favor, a service, forgiveness of a loan or promise of future employment. It does not mean reasonable compensation Qr ~en~s pa~d to a public official by the government of Rosevitle for work performed. Compensation A payment of "anything of value" to an individual in return for that individual's services of any kind. Association A business entity of any kind, a labor union, a club or any other group of two or more persons 'other than the immediate family. Immediate Family A reporting individual, spouse, minor children, minor stepchildren or other person residing in the same household. Gift The payment or receipt of "anything of value" unless consideration of greater or equal value is provided in return. City Manager The person that heads up the administration of the operating govern- ment of Roseville. Section 3. Ethical Considerations. Public officials are to serve all persons fairly and equitably without regard to their personal or-financial benefit. The credibility of Roseville government hinges on the proper discharge of duties in the public interest. Public officials must assure that the independence of their judgment and actions, without any consideration for personal gain, is preserved. -8081- / ~soi~tion No. 8593 : Page 3 Specific ethical considerations are enumerated below for the guidance of public officials, ~but these do not necessarily encompass all the possible ethical considerations that might arise. Other offices or Employment. An elected public official shall not hold another incompatible office as that term has been interpreted from time to time by statute, the courts, and by the Attorney General. Employed public officials shall not hold such incompatible office nor shall they engage in any regular outside employment with- out notice to and approval by the City Council, in the case of the City Manager, and the city Manager in the case of other employed public officials. Elected and appointed public officials shall not hold other office or employment which compromises the.perfor- mance of their elected or appointed duties without dis- closure of said office or employment and self disqualifi- cation from any particular action which might be compro- mised by such office or employment. Use of Confidential Information. No public official shall use information gained as a public official which is not generally made available to and/or is not known to the public, to.directly or indirectly gai~ anything of Solicitation of or Receipt of Anythinq of value. A public official shall not solicit or receive anything of value from any person or association, directly or indirectly, in consideration of some action to be taken or not to be taken in the performance of the public official's duties. Holdin~ ~nvest~nts. No public official shallohold any investment which might compromise the performance of the public official's duties without disclosure of said investment and self disqualification from any particular action which might be compromised by such investment, except as permitted by statute, such as Minnesota Statute 471.88. fo Reoresentation of Others. A public official shall not represent persons or associations in dealings with the city in consideration of anything of value. Financial Interest. Where a public official or a member of the public official's immediate family has a financial interest in any matter being considered by the public official, such interest, if known to the public official, shall be disclosed by the public official. If the public official has such a financial interest or if the minor child of a public official has such a financial interest, the public official shall be disqualified from further participation in the matter. -8082- Resolution No. 8593 g. c~it¥ propert¥~ No public official shall use city owned property such as vehicles, equipment, or supplies for personal convenience or profit except when such property is available to the public generally, or where such property is provided by specific city policy in the conduct of official city business. h. Special considerati°n~ No public official shall grant '~ny special consideration, treatment~ or advantage to any citizen beyond that which is available to every other citizen. i. ~ N© public official shall exceed his or her authority, or breach the law, or ask others to do so. j. Givin~ Anvthin~ of Value.... No elected public official shall give anything of value to.potential voters in return for their votes, promises, or financial, considera- tions Which would beeprohibited by the State Minnesota Fair Campaign Practices statute. k. Public Funds, etc.. No public official shall use public funds, personnel, facilities, or equipment for private gain or political campaign activities. 1. ~ Public officials shall provide complete docu- mentation to support'requests for expense reimbursement. Expense reimbursement shall be made in accordance with city policy. m. Donations. No public 'official shall take an official action which will benefit any person or entity because of a donation of anything of value to the city by such person or entity. n. officia~ Act~i°h... No public official shall take an official action which will benefit any person or entity where such public official would not have otherwise have taken such action but for the public official's family relationship, friendship, or business relationship with such person or entity. o. Comoliance with Laws.. Public officials shall comply with all local ordinances and State and Federal Statutes including, but not limited to, the Criminal Code, Fair Campaign Practices Act, and laws governing the function- ing of municipalities, their elected and appointed officials, and employees. Section_~4. Speciat Considerations. situations can arise where a member of a commission~ a board,.or the city Council abstains from voting because of a conflict of interest, but his or her abstention becomes a vote either for or against the matter because a m~jority are required to pass or reject that matter. This can happen where four-fifths vote is needed to pass an issue, or the vote has to be a clear m~g~'~ and a split vote does not pass or ~ /_ ~ol'ution .No. 8593 Page 5 When this happens, the City Attorney must be consulted and the final vote should carry a public notice .explaining what took place, and how it was resolved. Section 5. Handlinq Alleqed Violations of Code of EthiCs. An Ethics Commission is hereby established. The Commission shall be composed of three individuals, two of whom shall be residents of the city and the third shall be a nonresident. Initial appoint- ments shall be for terms of one, two, and three years respec- tively. Thereafter, appointments shall be for three year terms. The City Council shall appoint a chairperson and secretary from the Commission membership. Allegations of violations of this code against public officials, except employees who are subordinate to the city Manager, shall be referred to the Ethics Commission for investigation.. Allegations. which may constitute a violation of a federal, state, or local statute shall be referred to the appropriate criminal authority, Results of the investigation of the Ethics Commission shall be reported to the City Council along with the Commission's recom- mendation for disposition. Thereafter, the City Council shall take appropriate action which may include censure of a Council Member, discipline .of. City Manager, or no action. The Commission shall conduct .an organizational meeting during January of each year, and thereafter meet only at the request of the City Council or City Manager. Alleqations against public officials who are subordinate to the City Manager including the Fire Chief and Assistant Fire Chief~ shall be handled by the City Manager. The city Manager.may take appropriate d~scipliqary action against employees violating this code. ..~ Section 6. Disclosure of Financial Interests. Not later than ninety (90) days after the date of approval of this code, each public official of the City shall file as a public record, in the office of the city Manager, a statement containing the following: A list naming all business enterprises known by the public official to be licensed by or to be doing' business with the City in which the public official or any member of the public official's immediate family is connected as an employee, officer, owner, investor, creditor of, director, trustee, partner, advisor, or consultant; and A list of the public officials and members of the public officials' immediate family's interests in real property located in the City or which may be competing with the interests of the City located elsewhere, other than property occupied as a personal residence. -8084- Resolution N0..8593 ~%. , ~ch person who.enters upon.duty after the date of this code in an ~ office or position as to whzch a statement is required by ~his code shall file such a statement on forms to be provided by the City not. less than thirty (30) days after the date of his/her entrance on duty. Each person who made an initial filing shall file a new statement by January 30 of each year thereafter giving the information called for above as of the time of the new statement. If a change in financial interest or property ownership occurs between filings, a new filing shall be made within thirty (30) days of the change. The interest of any member of the i~mediate family shall be considered to be an interest of a person required to file a statement by or pursuant to this ordinance. This code shall not be construed to require the filing of any informa- tion relating to any person's connection with or interest in any pro- fessional society or any charitable, religious, social, fraternal, educational, recreational, public service, civil, or political orga- nj%etlon, or any similar' organization not conducted as a business enterprise and which is not engaged in the ownership or conduct of a business enterprise. However, if any of such organizations seeking any action or benefit ome before a Roseville commission or the Council, then membership in organization shall Se a potential conflict of interest and must be reported as such to the City Manager by the public official in an amended disclosure Statement. The other stipulations of this code then apply. The city Manager shall inform each person who is required to file of the time and place for filing. The city Manager sha!~ inform the Council whenever a person who is required to file a statement fails to do so. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Maschka, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Johnson, Maschka, Thomas, and Rog, and the following voted against the same: None. ~EREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF RA/ZSEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the. City of Rosevil!e, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of 'nutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 23rd day ,f July, 1990, with .the original thereof on file in my office. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 24th day of July, SEAL Steven~ Sa~oz~', City Man~%~ -8085- CITY OF ROSEVILLE DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL INTERESTS STATEMENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER CITY POSITION The City of Roseville Code of Ethics (ehctosed) provides that Roseville public officials shall file a Disclosure of Financial Interests Statement with the City Manager. Each person shall file the report within thirty days after assuming the position of a public official. Each person shall file a new statement by January 30 of each year thereafter during the time of service as a public official. If a change in financial interest or property ownership occurs between filings, a new filing shall be made within thirty days of the change. The interest of any member of the immediate family (spouse, minor children, minor stepchildren or other persons residing in the same household) shall be considered to be an interest of the public official. DISCLOSURE Names of all business enterprises known by you to be licensed by _or to be doing business with the City in which you'or any member of ygur. immediate family is connected as an employee, officer, owner, ..investor, creditor of, director, trustee, partner, advisor, or consultant. -8086- Disclosure of Financial Interests List your and members of your inunediate family's interests in real property located in the city of Roseville, Or which may be competing with the interests of the City located else- where, other than. property you occupy as a 'personal residence· tf you have any questions regarding the Code of Ethics or this form, please contact the city Manager. Date Signed -8087- II. III. CITY'OF RosEvILLE ETHICS COMMISSION HOW TO MAKE COMPLAINTS HOW THE COM~ISSION HANDLES COMPLAINTS Purpose Of These Procedures In July, 1990, the Roseville city Council adopted a Code of Ethics for Public officials and created the Roseville Ethics Commission ("Commission").. The Council's Ethics Resolution No. 8593 is attached to these procedures. Under the Ethics Resolution, the Roseville Ethics Conumission is to: . investigate ethics complaints that people may make against public officials as defined in the .~ Ethics Resolution, except complaints against department heads 'and assistant department heads. · recommend to the City Council what the Council should do when a complaint has been made. These procedures explain how to make a complaint to the Roseville Ethi. cs Commission and how the Commission will 'handle the complaints it receives. (The city Manager is responsible for receiving and investi- gating ethics complaints against department heads and assistant department heads.) · "And "ResDondent" Defined ,,Complainant -As used in these procedures: ,,Compiainan~" means a person who makes a complaint to the Commission. ,,Respondent" means the person the Complainant is complaining about. How To Start The ComDlaint Process Ao Who may make a comDlaint? 1. Any person 18 years or older may make a complaint to the Commission. 2. A person 18 years or older may make a complaint based on information received from a person younger than 18 years of age. -8088- Can a person ask questions and talk inf0rmall¥ with t~ Commission before making a complaint? Before filing a complaint, a person may talk informally with a member of the Ethics Commission to discuss questions the person may have about these procedures and the complaint process. THIS STEP IS OPTIONAL. C. How does a person make a complaint? To make a complaint, the person complaining (the "Complainant") must first write down: a) the name of the person the Complainant is com- plaining about (the "Respondent"); b) what the Respondent did that the Complainamt believes was unethical; and c) a statement that the Complainant believes the complaint is true and not frivolous. The written complaint must be specific enough and understandable enough to enable the Commission to make a reasonable investigation. o The Complainant must then sign the complaint, print his' or her name under the signature, and give an address and telephone number where the Commission can contact him or her. 3. 'The complainant must then bring or mail the~ com- plaint to the Rosevil!e city Council, 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville, MN 55113. The Commission will not act on anonymous complaints, eXcepts, if an anonymous complaint accuses someone of a crime, the Commission will refer the complaint to the Roseville Police Chief. iV. How The Commission Responds to a Como!aint A. Notice to the Respondent and the Complainant As soon as the Commission receives a complaint, the Commission: a) will notify the Complainant in writing that the Commission has received the complaint and will give the Complainant a copy of these procedures; and b) will notify the Respondent in writing of the complaint and will givs the Respondent a copy of these procedures and a copy of the complaint. 2 -8089- The Commission will give both the Complainant and Respondent a copy of: a) any recommendation the Commission makes to the City Council concerning the complaint; and b) any supporting reasons the Commission gives to the Council to explain the Commission's recom- mendation. B. The Commission's first decision--whether to qo forward with the complaint As soon as possible, but in any event within fourteen (14) calendar days after receivin~ a complaint, the Commission will meet t~ consider: a) whether the Respondent or Respondents named ~in the complaint are among the officials the Com- mission has the responsibility 'to investigate; b). whether the behavior described in the complaint would, if true, be a violation of the Code of Ethics; and c) whether the complaint itself meets the require- ments of Section Iii of these procedures. The C~mmission will not dismiss a complaint for being vague or lacking specifics without first explaining its concern to the Complainant, and asking the Complainant to clarify the complaint. Otherwise the Commission will ordinarily make the decision based on the written complaint and will not receive oral testimony or other information from the Complainaht or Respondent. The Commission meeting is, however, open to the public, including the qomplainant and Respondent. If the answer to one o~ more of these questions is "no" the Commission will recommend that the City Council dismiss the complaint and will explain, in writing, its reasons for the recommendation. The Commission will send or give both the Complainant and Respondent a copy of the Commission's recommendations and reasons. Through one or more of its members, the Commission will present its recommendation and reasons at a Council meeting. If the answer to all four of the questions is "yes" the Commission will consider the complaint further, as explained in Section IV - C of these procedures. 3 -8090- The Commission's further handlinq of the complaint When the Commission further considers a complaint, the commission may take any of the following actions: a) meet to discuss the complaint; b) reques~ a wrlt%en response from the Respondent; c) request further written information from the Complainant or Respondent; d) request written information from "third parties" (that is--people or organizations other than the Complainant and Respondent);. e) authorize one of its members to communicate with the Complainant, the Respondent, or third par~ ties; f) ~hold a public hearing with witnesses testifying under oath. If the Commission has budgeted funds available, the Commission may retain private investigators, special counsel, or other experts to assist with the investigation or other consideration of a complaint. D. The Commission's recommendation to the City Council When the Commission finishes its further consideration of a complaint the Commission will, in writing: recommend to the Council, what the Council should do with the complaint; and give ~he Commission's reasons for the recommenda- tion. -~ The Commission will send or give a copy of its recommendation and reasons to the Complainant and Respondent. Through one or more of its members, the Commission will present the recommendation and reasons at a Council meeting. Referral for Criminal Investiaation If at anytime during the handling of a signed complaint, the Commission has reason to believe that an official the Commission has the responsibility to investigate may have committed a criminal offense, then the Commission will refer the matter to the appropriate authority for investigation. -8091- ./ . VI. VII. Until the end of that investigation and any resulting prosecution, the Commission will take no further action on the complaint. At the end of that investigation and any resulting prosecution, the Commission will again consider the complaint. Procedures For Commission Meetinqs A. Meetinqs The Chair or two members of the Commission may schedule a meeting on reasonable advance notice to other members of the Commission. B. Quorum A quorum is two members of the Commission. c. Member DarticiDation by telephone A member may participate in a meeting by telephone and may vote by telephone, but may not be counted toward the quorum. D. QDen meetinq requirements Ail meetings of the Commission will be open to the public unless: a) State statute permits a meeting to be closed; and b) the Commission, by majority vote, decides to meet in Executive Session. 2. If the Commission does hold an Executive Session, the Commission will either tape record the session 9r arrange for verbatim minutes. Public Nature of Information The Commission will treat as public data all written information received, considered, or generated by the Commission except when the Commission receives a written legal opinion from its attorney, stating that particular information or types of information are not public. Adopted June 4, 1991 Revised February 14, 1992 Revised July 23, 1993 Revised September 14, 1993 -8092- -8093- -8094- CtTY OF BLAINE CODE OF ETHICS INFORMATION hical standards are essential to the public affairs of the City. The purpose of the Code of Ethics is to establish ethical standards of conduct for City officials by setting forth those acts or actions that are incompatible with the best interests of the City and by directing disclosure by such officials of private, financial, Or other interests in matters affecting the City. By doing this, the Council hopes to promote the faith and confidence of the citizens of the City in their government. The following information is disclosed in compliance with the City of Blaine Code of Ethics adopted on August 2, 1979, and is applicable to all members of the City Council, Charter Commission, all advisory and committee members and top level City employees defined as the City Manager, City Attorney, and Supervisory City employees, specifically Director of Public Works, Police Chief, Director of Community Services, Director of Administrative Services, City Clerk, Director of Community Development, and Building Official. REAL PROPERTY OWNED IN THE CITY OF BLAINE List all real property owned or being purchased ~y the Councilmember, Commissioner, or covered City emEIoyee, spouse, or minor child, or in which he has a legal or equitable title. The actual value of any property is not required. Include homestead property. _Property/ Location Owner of Property, Identify all ownership or interests in City of Blaine. Name of Organization: ASSETS corporation or other business enterprises .or agencies doing business with the (Additional information requested on other side) -8095- AFFILIATIONS Corporations, proprietorships, partnerships, labor unions, or associations with organizations doing business with the City of Blaine with which Councilmember, Commissioner, or covered City employee has an affiliation ~ officer, director, proprietor, partner, or employee (including such position held by spouse). Name of O .rFlanization Position Held compensation Involved ..Yes or No Signature Title Date Received and filed in the Office of the City Clerk this day of ,19 . Joyce Twistol, CMC, City Clerk -8096- 105.00 (amended 12/13/93, Section 105 - Code of Ethics O. rd. 93-667) 105.00. Purpose. The City Council of the C!ty o~Mirunetonka confirms its determination that ethical standards amon~i~ members, as well as the members of the various commissions of the City of Minnetonka, are essential to .the public affairs of the City.. The standards of conduct herein set forth are intended to serve as a guideline for the members of the City Council and the commissioners in carrying out their duties. By eliminating conflicts of interest and providing a guide for conduct in City matters, the City Council hopes to promote the faith and .con- fidence of the citizens of Minnetonka in their government, and to encourage its citizens to serve on its Council and commissions. 105.05. Standards of Conduct. 1. No Council member or member 'of any board or commission, shall use such position to secure special privileges or exemptions for such person or others. 2. Except as permitted by law, a Council member or members of a board or commission-must disclose a potential conflict of interest for the public .record and refrain from'participating in the discussion and vote, when a matter comes before that person which: a. Affects the pers6n's financial interests or those of a business with which the person is associated, un- less the effect on the person or business i.s no greater than on other members of the same business classification, profession or oc6upation, or b. Affects the financial interests of "an organization in which the person participates as 'a member of the governing body, unless the person serves in that capaci, ty as the City's representative. 3. No' Council member or member of a board, or commission shall act as an agent or attorney for another in any matter before the City Council or any board or comm~s- sion in which a conflict of interest exists o5 may exist. No Council member or member of any board or commission shall knowingly receive, accept, take, seek',' or solicit, directly or indirectly, any gift or loan for himself, herself, or another which is prohibited by state law (Minn. Stat. 471..895). (amended 8/8/94, Ord. 94-690) - 15 - -8097- 105.~5 ~O Council member or mem~-'of any'board or commission may solicit or accept, and no person may offer or pay to a public official or employee, compensation or reimbursement for expenses for the performance of the persons' public duties, except: Compensation and expenses paid by the City· Compensation and expenses from other employment, if the outside employment does not interfere with, influence, or compromise the person's public position, and c. Compensation' and expenses' paid by another governmental agency or municipal association to a Council member or member of a board or commission who serves as. a City representative on or for that agency, but .only if the City does not also pay the person for '%he same activity. No Council member or member of any board or commission may use Public money, time, personnel, facilities, or equipment for private gain or political campaign activities except when: a. the use is required or authorized by law, or b. the use is no greater than that allowed for members of the general public. This paragraph does not prohibit correspondence at any time to individual residents in response to the - 16 - -8098- 105.10 resident's specific inquiries, or general surveys of residents which are conducted before the time of filing for candidacy for elected office on the Council. No Council member or member of a board or commission may disclose to the public, or use for the private gain of self or others, information which was gained by reason of the official's public position and which is not public data. Further, no Council member or member of a board or commission may 'disclose information received, discussed, or decided in conference with the Council's or board's attorney which is protected by the attorney/client privilege, unless a majority of the Council or board has authorized that disclosure. No Council member or member of any board or commission shall enter into any contract with the City of Minnetonk~, unless authorized by law. ~Any Council member or member of a board or co~u.ission who has a proprietary interest of 10 percent or more in an agency doing business with the City shall make known that interest in writing to the City Council and the City Clerk. 105.10. Disclosures. Within 30 days after taking the oath of office or being appointed to a position, each Council member and member of a City board or commission shall file a rePort with the City Clerk on a form prepared by the clerk, which contains the information specified below for the preceding year. Thereafter, each person shall file a supplemental report on the first day of February of every year and within 30 days after any change in information provided under paragraph-5. The information shall be for the individual, the individual's spouse, and all minor children (collectively referred to below as "person"). 1. Any business entity in which the person is an officer, director, member, or employee, and the position held. 2. Any business .entity in which the person has an ownership interest, either legal or equitable, greater than 5%. e Se Ail sources of income, compensation, fees, or commissions which are received from employment, for services rendered, or from pensions, except the.employment of minor children. Ail non-profit organizations in which the person serves on the governing body, and the position held, except if serving in that capacity as the City's representative. Ail real property within the City owned by the person or in which the person has a beneficial interest and which has an assessed valution in excess of $!0,000. The person's homestead need not be included. The .term "business entity" includes any business, pro- prietorship, firm,, partnership, person~in representative or fiduciary capacity, association, venture, trust or corporation. - 17 - -8099- .' 105.15 105.15. Hearing. Upon the written complaint of any person questioning adherence to these principles or alleging a conflict of. . interest or failure to file a required disclosure statement, or on the Council's own volition, the Council may hold a hearing thereon at which the person so accused shall have opportunity to be heard. A hearing shall be held only if the City Council determines (1) upon advise of the City Attorney, designee or other attorney appointed by the Council, that the. allegations rise to the level of a violation of these principles or to the level of a legally- recognized conflict of interest, and (2) that the complaint has been lodged in good faith and not for impermissible purposes such as delay. If after the hearing, the Council finds that a conflict of interest, failure to file a required disclosure, or violation of these principles does exist as herein defined, the Council may take whatever action it deems appropriate including but not limited to referring the matter :for criminal prosecution, imposing a Civil penalty not exceeding $2,000 per violation, directing an official not to'participate in a decision, or removing an appointed member of an'advisory board or co~u,~ission from office. - 18 - -8100- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com July 5, 2001 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: KANDIS HANSON BONNIE RITTER APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS I have been in contact with the League regarding the requirements and practices for appointments to Boards and Commissions. In a nutshell, the City Council may organize advisory boards and commissions in any manner that it deems appropriate. There is not a State Statute that regulates this process. Historically, the City of Mound has adopted resolutions to dictate policy in this manner. The current policy is spelled out in Resolution #01-15, which is attached. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #01-15 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #89-139-A RESOLUTION APPROVING A POLICY ON APPOINTM]ENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY COMMISSIONS BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby establishes the following policy: Definitions of"VaCancy": A vacancy occurs when a term expires. A vacancy also occurs when a commissioner resigns his/her position prior to the term expiring. When a vacancy occurs, the City Manager is directed to advertise in the City's official newspaper that there are positions to be filled on a commission (s). Such advertising shall be done in the form of a "news release". Such news release shall include, but not be limited to, the number of vacancies, the length of the term, or request for letter of interest andYor resume, application deadline date, etc. The news release shall also state the prospective applicants will be required to interview with the City Council and respective commission jointly. Such interviews will be conducted as soon as possible following the application deadline. Each commission will formally recommend appoinuments following the joint interviews. The City CounciI will review those recommendations and will be responsible for making appointments. Current commission members who wish to be re-appointed must indicate such by submitting an application. If a member resigns during his/her term, such resignation must be in writing and submitted to the City Manager. In the case of member resining with less than ninety (90) days remain/ng on his/her term, the City Council, at its discretion, may delay filling the vacancy until the term officially expires. A commission member seeking re-appointment has the option to interview as he or she chooses. -8102- The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Brown and seconded by Councilmcmber Hanus. The following Councilmember voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus and Meisel. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Anderson and Meyer. Adopted January 23,2001 Mayor ' Acdfig City Clerk -8103- October 24, 1989 P. ESOLUTION f89-139 "Exhibit A", page 7.. of 3 RESOLUTION APPROVING A POLICY ON APPOINT)lENTS AND P.F~%~POINT~tENTS TO ADVISORY COM){ISSIONS BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby establishes the following policy: Definitions of "Vacancy": A vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding that term does not desire reappointment. A vacancy also occurs when a commissioner resigns his/her position prior to the term expiring. When a vacancy occurs, the City Manager is directed to advertise in the City's official newspaper that there are positions to be filled on a commission(s). Such advertising' shall be done in the form of a "news release". Such news release shall include, but not be limited to, the number of vacancies, the length of the term, or request for letter of interest and/or resume, application deadline date, etc. The news release shall also state that prospective ap- plicants will be required to interview with the City Council and respective commission jointly. Such interviews will be conducted as soon as pos- sible following the application deadline. Each commission will formally-recommend appointments following the joint interviews. The City Council will review those recommendations and will be responsible for making the appointments. Current commission members who wish to be reap- pointed must indicate such and the reasons for being reappointed in writing a minimum of' sixty (60) days prior to their term expiring. e If a member resigns during his/her term, such resignation must be in writing and 'submitted to the City Manager. _. In the case of member resigning with less than ninety (90) days remaining on his/her term, the City Council, at its discretion, may delay filling the vacancy until the term officially expires." The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jessen and-seconded by Counci!member Johnson. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY DOCKS COMMISSION APRIL 19, 2001 6. DISCUSS: FISHING DOCKS (Peter Meyer will be in attendance to discuss) City Council Meyer stated how he appreciates everything the Commission does for our community. Meyer then read from a newspaper explaining how fishing is important to families and youth. Neighborhood fishing spots in Mound are decreasing rapidly and would like to get some suggestions from the Commission as to how to stop this trend. Chair Funk stated that this has been brought before the Commission previously. The Commission sees a challenge to keep this issue before the Mound residents. Commissioner Goldberg stated that the Commission should redefine what we are trying to accomplish and would like to come back with a short list of ideas as to support this issue. The Commission will bring to the May meeting a short list of ideas. City Council Member Meyer introduced a book on designing lakescapes, maintenance, stabilization, etc. City Council Representative Hanus requested staff to have Jon Sutherland, Building Official, provide this Commission with the new buffering ordinance that are/will be going into place. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY DOCKS COMMISSION MAY 10, 2001 7A. FISHING DOCKS City Council Representative Meyer gave report/update on fishing docks. (See presentation from dock minutes). Commissioner Taylor indicated her concern about the fishing area by Black Lake Bridge. -8105- EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY DOCKS COMMISSION MAY 17, 2001 DISCUSS: FISHING ACCESS/DESIGNATED AREAS City Councilman Meyer has requested the fishing docks be added on the agenda because he is looking for ways to increase fishing opportunities for our families and children. City Council Representative Hanus questioned if this is the appropriate place to start this issue. The group is appropriate for dock issues and this should be brought in front of the City Council and the Park Commission. This group's focus is not involved with public dockage and this is not the appropriate place to start. The Commission must decide of it wants to take on this project. This question should be answered first. Hanus will not now or in the future support a fishing pier for the general public. He will not install this in someone's backyard or next to his or her private land. Also parking is a major issue. Commissioner Jones stated this issue should go to Parks and Open Space Commission first. Also concerned about out-of-towners and parking a major problem. Commissioner Eurich does not feel the DACA should take on this project at this time. City Councilman Meyer stated he started this issue last fall during his campaign. Multiple docks improve things especially the aesthetics; however eliminated the fishing. In this area 30 households made this an issue and the fishing area came up. People across the city (425 dock sites) have spoke to me about this. Meyer is looking for volunteers to coordinate a program. Hanus stated that Centerview Beach is a dedicated fishing beach from the DNR. This people are mostly adults and they drive to this area. Never has one sole asked me to add fishing piers for children and adults. MOTION by Goldberg seconded by Jones: 1. The Dock and Commons Commission is in favor of providing more fishing areas to Mound children (if a demand is determined). 2, The Dock and Commons Commission is opposed to docks that would be set in front of people's houses for the sole purpose of fishing (in - 8106 - m front of any dockage for fishing purposes should be in a residential setting). The Dock and Commons Commission is in favor of a communication program within the context of the City of Mound to establish a program or encourage dock and lakeshore residents opening up access to neighborhoods kids ( if a demand is determined). The Docks and Commons Commission is to consider investigating a program to coordinate volunteers to take children fishing. 5. The Docks and Commons Commission encourages the Park Commission to address this issue. (Work with the Park Commission). DISCUSSION: Commissioner Eurich does not see a defined need for this. This is not within the scope of the Dock Commission. There is no way to determine the demands of this from the neighborhoods. This should be steered through the neighborhoods. MOTION carried unanimously. -8107- Jun 22 2881 15:42:25 FRIDAYFAX A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities 881 Of 88Z Number Z. June 22, 2001 A light at the end of the tunnel? Ventura makes tax offer Around noon today, the governor presented a tax offer to House and Senate leadership that he believes "reflects the bottom line priorities of all three sides" and will allow the Legislature to bring the session to a close. The Senate apparently is agreeing to the compromise and the House will apparently react in the near future. Although we have few details on the offer at this time, the compromise bill apparently fully implements the May 25 agreement for property tax and school finance reform and relief. It contains the state takeover of the general education property taxes and includes much of the class rate compression contained in the original House tax bill. Unlike the May 25 agreement, the proposal will increase payments under the Local Government Aid formula, and reserves additional funds for city aid payments until the Legislature restructures the Local Government Aid formula. The increase will offset the large reduc- tions in HACA included in the May 25 agreement. The proposal addresses another contentious issuemthe governor is proposing to enact the statewide business property tax, which was a House proposal, but he is suggest- ing the revenue should be dedicated to education, which was a Senate position. This latter issue may not be agreeable to the House. We will provide more information on these developments on Monday. Tax Working Group delays further negotiations Despite a week of fairly productive dialogue, the House/Senate Tax Working group concluded its Thurs- day meeting with a comment by House Chair Ron Abrams that the group has gone about as far as it can go. He went on to state that they now need agreement from House and Senate leadership on the remaining major divisive issues, which include the level of the state- wide business property tax, whether to dedicate the state property tax to education, the long-term impact of class rate compression on homes, and the level of funding for LGA. At this time, it is unclear whether the governor's Friday compromise proposal will break the logjam. With only about one week remaining before the state's spending authority expires, any further delays will undoubtedly make a timely resolu- tion of the state's budget almost impossible. Many of the appropria- tions groups have not met in the past week and several have not met since the end of the regular session. In addition to the lack of agreement on many of the major issues, it may not be physically possible to assemble the volume of legislation needed to keep the state running. If the Legislature decides to attempt a completion on all of the major bills, next week will be extremely busy. However, the Senate introduced a "lights-on" bill Thursday that may be the only hope of averting a state shutdown. The House and the governor have not agreed to the lights-on approach; therefore, even that alternative could fail to avert a shutdown. The Tax Working Group has announced they would meet at the call of the chair. From the tone of the concluding discussions, a Friday meeting sounds unlikely. The group may meet over the weekend. Levy limit agreement On Tuesday, the working group agreed to the general form of levy limits. Under the proposal, the pay 2002 levy limit for cities over 2,500 population will be equal to the greater of a limit computed with the actual 2001 levy plus aids plus one year of growth adjustment orthe pay 2000 levy plus aids inflated for two years of growth adjustments. The growth adjustment includes three factors: 1 ) The annual percentage increase in households within the city. 2) The percentage increase in inflation as defined by the implicit price deflator (an inflation adjust- ment). 3) The annual percentage increase in new construction of commer- cial and industrial property within the city. Rep. Abrams offered this compro- mise approach to levy limits, which was based on a recommendation by city and county lobbyists. The League provided working group members with information that showed the largest city levy increases in 2001 were strongly correlated with rapid population growth. Up to that point many working group members believed the major reason for some For more information on city legislative issues, contact an)' member of the League of Minnesota (651) 281-1200 or [800) 925-1122 -8108- Cities lntergoverrtmental Relations teatra Jun 22 2001 15;43;19 Via Fax -> A&ministrator Page 882 Of 882 FNDAYFAX 22, 2001 -- P,~GE 2 city levy increases was the fact that law limits were sunset for 2001 and that some cities were taking advan- tage of the repeal. The "greater of" compromise should provide a levy limit significantly less onerous for some cities and counties than the original House proposal. Under the original House plan, levy limits were based on the pay 2000 law plus aids inflated for two years of growth adiustments. This original calculation would have severely limited levy increases for cities with larger increases for pay 2001. Maintaining the option of the original House levy limit calculation means those cities with very small levy increases in 2001 will not lose levy authority for the 2002 levy year. The only remaining issue with levy mits is whether any additional jeted levy increases will be defined as "special levies" which are outside any limitation. For example: under past levy limits, levies for debt service, legal judgments or natural disasters have been excluded from the limitation. Most of the past special lev,/definitions will likely be preserved. We have been suggest- ing to the group that any increased employer contribution to address the PERA coordinated plan defi- ciency be exempted from levy limits. The working group will likely decide the issue of new special levies at the last minute. Although the working group has settled most of the levy limit issues, they have not decided whether a reverse referendum process will be included in any final bill. Again, we expect the reverse referendum issue to be decided at the last minute. State shutdown preparations This afternoon, the Department of Employee Relations and several other state agencies are hosting a meeting with representatives of local government to discuss poten- tial issues that may impact cities and counties if non-essential state operations cease on July 1. The state has outlined some broad parameters under which state operations would continue. Depart- ment of Employee Relations Com- missioner Julian Carter outlined a short list of state services determined to be most crucial to protecting and preserving life, health, and safety. Carter mentioned specific examples of services that would be continued, including custodial care of residents in state nursing homes and veterans' homes, operation and supervision of correctional facilities, basic law enforcement and emergency services, child support and public assistance nursing care, as well as foOd and dairy inspection services. Earlier this week the League distrib- uted a memo to members that attempted to identify implications of a state budget shutdown. Perhaps the most visible and immediate impact on cities could be a delay in the distribution of LGA, HACA, and MSA (street funding) programs. A copy of the memo is available on the LMC web site at www. lmnc. org. Sign up for the LMC legislative issues listerv Sign up for the up-and-running Intergovernmental Relations Legislative Listserv! Visit the LMC web site at www. lmnc.orglforms/listserv, cfm to sign up and receive periodic, up-to-the-minute legislative news. We hope members will find this service especially informative as the Legislature continues to work to bring the session to a close. -8109- Jau 29 2881 14:25:12 Via Fax -> Administrator Page 881 0£ 883 FRIDAYFAX Number 2~, To.the-wire tax ollow On Tuesday and Wednesday, the joint House/Senate tax working group put the finishing touches on the compromise tax bill and both the House and Senate passed the bill on Thursday. The completion of the tax bill should ensure that the four appropriations bills passed earlier this week (Higher Education, Family and Early Childhood, Environment/ Natural Resou rces/Agriculture and the Jobs/Housing) are signed by the governor. Gev. Jesse Ventura had earlier asked the Legislature to give him the tax bill before he would sign any of the appropriations bills. The K-12 education finance bill was passed on the House floor Thursday evening. The Senate will consider the bill when they convene at 10 a.m. Friday. The Health and Human Services bill was completed late Thursday; the Transportation and State departments working groups met into the early morning but have yet to complete their work. They are expected to reconvene this morning. The tax compromise is largely based on the governor's proposal of June 22 and includes, among other provisions, a state takeover of the general education property tax levy, $140 million appropriation increase for LGA with several formula changes, levy limits for counties and cities over 2,500 population for two years, the repeal of homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA), a new state property tax, class rate compression and a new market value homestead credit. The com- promise does not include a reverse referendum component. The bill provides the bulk of property tax relief through the elimination of the general education property tax levy. This will reduce property taxes by approximately $1.2 billion. In addition, the tax bill will increase the general education funding level by folding a portion of existing school operating referendum levies into the general education aid formula. Homeowners will receive additional tax relief through a new $319 million market value homestead credit and agricultural land will receive $17 mil- lion of relief through a new agricultural land credit. Homeowners will also receive additional tax relief though an expanded property tax refund. For cities, the bill implements significant changes to the state's property tax and state aid systems. HACA, which currently provides $200 million in aid to cities, is eliminated. The property classifica- tion system is substantially modified and class rates are compressed. Law limits are implemented for two years. The LGA formula is modified and the appropriation is substantially increased. Following is a brief summary of some of the most significant changes affecting cities. Local Government Aid The LGA formula changes include an appropriation increase of $140 mil- lion and the creation of a new LGA reform account that is funded with $14 million beginning in 2003. The formula has several changes including an increase in the "local effort rate" to reflect the loss of city HACA, a new one-time increase limit for cities of the first class equal to 102.5 percent of its 2001 LGA plus HACA, and a one-time limitation for all other cities equal to 40 percent of the sum of its net levy for taxes payable in 2001 plus its 2001 HACA. For non-metro cities over 10,000 population, the city aid base is increased in 2002 by the lesser of $60 times the population over 5,000 or $2,500,000. The maximum increase permitted in 2002 is also adjusted to reflect this increase. The LGA provisions include special adjustments for the cities of Osseo, Hopkins and Newport. The 1993 aid base (grandfather) remains in place but a number of cities will receive less LGA in 2002 than they received in 2001 due to the other formula changes. Although the tax bill contains an LGA reform account, it does not contain any formal reform study language. During negotiations on the bill, the tax chairs had discussed a possible interim study to redesign the formula to account for newly available demographic data from the decennial census. We will have a copy of a computer simulation of the impact of the bill on LGA available on the League's web site at www. lmnc.org. Levy Limits Under the bill, levy limits are imposed for two years. The pay 2002 levy limit will be equal to the greater of a limit computed with the actual 2001 levy plus 2001 state aids plus one year of growth adjustment (see definition below), orthe pay 2000 levy plus 2000 state aids inflated for two years of growth adjustments. This structur~ will not penalize either those cities that enacted large levy increases for 2001 or those cities that enacted very small levy increases in 2001. For more information on city legislative issues, contact(651)anY281m,~-~,l~r,~e_ 8 O,-')o)l'eague925-1122°fMinnes°ta Cities Intergovernmental Relations team. FRIDAY'FAX 29, 2001 -- P,~ 2 The growth adjustment includes three factors: 1) The annual percentage increase in households within the city 2) The percentage increase in inflation as defined by the implicit price deflator (an inflation adjust- ment). 3) The annual percentage increase in new construction of commer- cial and industrial property within the city. The levy limit calculation automati- cally adjusts the property tax levy for changes in state aids. Therefore, the elimination of HACA and changes to the LGA formula will automatically increase or decrease the levy authority for a city. In addition, the levy limits are structured so that if a city does not use all of its levy authority in any year, that authority is carded forward as additional levy authority in subsequent years. The bill exempts levy increases necessary to fund employer contri- bution increases for the PERA coordinated plan. Cities can exceed the levy limit by passing a local referendum. The Department of Revenue will be requesting from cities the necessary information to compute levy limits and existing special levies in early July. The cities and counties will have to reply by July 20, 2001 or their levy limit will be computed solely based on the pay 2000 levy limits. Class Rates under the Omnibus Tax Bill Proposed Class Rates Current I Local State Property Classification Law Tax Tax Residential Homestead; Up to $76,000 1.0% 1.0% $76,000 - $500,000 1.65% 1.0% Over $500,000 1.65% 1.25% Residential Non-homestead; Single unit: Up to $76,000 1.2% 1.0% $76,000 - $500,000 1.65% 1.0% Over $500,000 1.65% 1.25% 2-3 unit and undeveloped land 1.65% 1.5% ' Apartments; Regular 2.4% 1.8% ~ Small city 2.15% 1.8% = Low-income 1.0% 0.9% ~ Comm ercial-lndustriaI-Pu blic Utility; Up to $150,000 2.4% 1.5% Over $150,000 3.4% 2.0% Electric generation machinery 3.4% 2.0% Seasonal Recreational Residential; Up to $76,000 1.2% 1.0% ' $76,000 - $500,000 1.65% 1.0% · Over $500,000 1.65% 1.25% ' ~ Rate reduced to 1.25% in pay 2003 and thereafter. z Rate reduced to 1.5% in pay 2003 and 1.25% in pay 2004 and thereafter. ~ Rate increased to 1.0% in pay 2003, classification abolished in pay 2004. · Exempt from referendum market value tax. -8111- 1,5% 2.0% n/a 0.4% 1.0% 1.25% Truth-in-Taxation The bill makes several changes to the proposed property tax notices, although many of these changes apparently will not take effect until the fall of 2002. The delay is based on concerns raised by county auditors about the difficulty of reprogramming their computer systems because of the late conclusion of the session. For 2002 Only: Due to the late enactment of the bill, it will include several one-time changes to the truth-in-taxation system. T-N-T hearings this fall will not be manda- tory; however, a city can choose to hold a hearing. The parcel-specific notice will be simplified to give the counties more time to reprogram their computer systems. The distri- bution of the notice also will be delayed until mid-December. The modified 2002 parcel-specific notice will contain the total tax paid in 2001 and the proposed tax for 2002 itemized for each local unit of government. This form of the notice should minimize taxpayer concerns about city levy increases due to the loss of state aid because a compari- son of the 2001 actual city tax and the 2002 proposed city tax will not be reported on the notice. The bill provides the commissioner of Revenue with the authority to grant waivers from this fall's modi- fied parcel-specific notice require- ments if the county can demonstrate that they cannot reasonably comply with the notice requirements. For 2003 and beyond: The current truth-in-taxation hearing requirement that applies to cities over 500 popu- lation is modified to provide an exemption if the proposed levy increase is less than inflation as defined by the implicit price deflator for government consumption expenditures; currently, the IPD is estimated to be 3.4 percent. Jun 29 2881 14;~6:56 Vi~ F~x -~ ~dninis~r~or Poge 083 Of 883 FRIDAYFAX JuNe 29, 2001 ~ P~se 3 The current requirement that cities over 500 population adopt a resolu- tion authorizing a tax rate increase is repealed for taxes levied this fall and replaced with a modification to the required truth-in-taxation adver- tisement. Under the bill, the adver- tisement must now show three tax rates: 1) the current local tax rate, 2) the proposed rate if no levy increase is adopted and 3) the tax rate under the proposed budget. The parcel-specific notices must contain a phone number for taxpay- ers to call if they have questions about the notice. Tax Increment Financing Article 15 contains this year's local development provisions, most notably, mechanisms to address the impact of the overall property tax reform components of the bill. Generally, cities and development authorities with tax increment financing (TIF) districts impacted by property tax reform will be required first to implement "local solutions" before they will be permitted to apply for the "state solution." Local solutions include an expanded pooling authority and a special deficit authority under which the frozen tax rate may float and, in the metropolitan area and on the Iron Range, the fiscal disparities option may be changed. The state solution is an increased and continuing appropriation to the existing TIF grant fund. In 2002, $91 million will be appropriated, and in 2003 and there- after $38 million will be appropriated. Concerns with the "pipeline projects" have been addressed largely by extending the deadline for issuing bonds and entering into binding contracts from June 2 to Aug. 1, 2001. Additionally, "pay as you go" deals are eligible for the TIF grant fund if the agreement specifies a fixed dollar amount. TIF grants will not be available where agreements provide for "all the increment gener- ated" or a percentage of all the increment generated. However, the city or development authority will have the ability to voluntarily provide increments to the level anticipated prior to property tax reform. Several technical modifications to the TIF and abatement statutes that surfaced early in the regular session in the TIF "technical" bill are also part of the local development article. Among these more minor changes is specific authorization for TI F authorities to pay project costs with interfund loans and receive reim- bursement, with interest, from tax increments. Several issues that have been the subject of much discussion over the past six months were not included in Article 15: · Limitations on pre-1990 districts · 'l-IF consultant registration require- merits · Special taxing authority require- ment for deficits · Elimination of the conclusive effect of findings · Blight test ("structurally substan- dard'') definition modifications · OSA enforcement authority abolishment and beginning/end o' time changes · Line-item budget modifications · Prohibition on dropping parcels from a TIF district in order to grant an abatement We are compiling a complete summary of the tax bill and other major appropriations bills. We hope to have the summary completed and included in the July 11 issue of Cities Bulletin. -8112- AMM fAX Hetropolitau unidpalitiel Legislature Nears Closure Two Spending Bills Approved As of Tuesday, June 26, the Legislature, in acting special session, had approved two budget bills. On Monday both the House and Senate approved the higher education and natural resources budget bills. The eco- nomic development and eariy childhood bills were passed by the House on Tuesday, and are ex- ewected to pass in the Senate today ednesday). The tax bill is sched- uled for House floor action Wednes- day. The economic development bill (HF 5) includes appropriations and policies retated to work force devel- opment, economic development, housing and tourism. The budgets of the Departments of Trade and Economic Development, Commerce, Economic Security, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and the Minnesota Historical Society are all under the jurisdiction of the bill. The highlights of the bill are as follows; AMIff News Fax is foxed to all AMM city ~nana.~ers and administrators, legislative contacts nnd Board members. Plett.~e share this fax wtth your mayors, counciIrnembers and staff to keep them abreast of Impor- tant rn~ro city issues. 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 215.4000 Fax: (651) 281-]299 Z E._mqil: a~145, org · The Department of Economic Security is abolished and its duties and responsibilities are transferred to the Department of Trade and Economic Development and the Department of Com- merce. · The overall budget for the depart- ments covered by the bill was no increase to the base budget. While there may be some one- tim,.= spending and increases to specific programs, the budget target was no dollar increase. · The various programs of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) are consolidated into larger related programs. · The MHFA along with the Office of Strategic and Long Range Plan- ning are directed to conduct a study of inclusionary housing. The report is to be presented to the legislature in 2002. · The bill does not contain any language permitting or mandating cities or developers to produce inclusionary housing. · The Governor's proposal to use $24.0 mitlion in federal funding (TANF) for housing is in the bill This is one time funding. Tax Bill Nearing Completion /~,s of 10:00 p,m. Tuesday '~night, the tax-working group had completed its tax bill. It's anticipated that the tax biflwilt be taken up on the House and possibly. Senate floor this after- noon (Wed.). A subsequent fax on Thursday (after bill passage) will provide more details.,The bill contains the following: · PropeCty tax reform.that is centered on rate compression and the takeovei' of the general education levy. · State aid programs that will take over some county Services, target tax relief to property owners, and increase the LGA uosuuH s!puu~ appropriation to ensure all classes of property get tax relief. A grant program that will have the Commissioner of Revenue provide grants to tax increment finance (TIF) districts that experience shortfalls resulting from the reform. The grants will begin in 2003 and in each year thereafter. The program is initially funded at' $195 million. · Levy limits for two years, calcu- lated in a manner that does not penalize cities that either did or did not increase levies for payable 2001. The initial House provision for reverse referen- dum in 2004 was NOT included. -8113- AMM FAX lie June 18-22,2001 _ ~ I I I II I , l',Iociation of Municipalitie Levy Limits, Transit Funding Agreements Made by Tax Working Group On Tuesday June 19, the ~ tax-working group agreed to a two-year levy limit and removing metropolitan transit property taxes from the levy. The working group agreed to a levy limit that is the greater of either a two- year increase starting with the 2000 levy revenue base or a one- year increase on the actual levy for 2001 taxes minus bonded debt and other levies considered special levies. This ensures that cities, which have been frugal, will not lose the excess cushion in their revenue base nor will cities that had a relatively large levy increase for 2001 be cut short in 2002 with no increase. Revenue base equals levy plus aid. Increases are based on the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD), household growth, and one-half new C/i growth. The actual levy limit is revenue base minus aid. The working group also agreed to have the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST) replace the operating levies of the metropolitan and rural transit authorities. The working group approved a motion that would have 20.5% of the MVST pay for metropolitan transit levies and 1% of the MVST pay for outstate transit. The working group could increase the state, tax portion if it is part of a general agreement be- tween legislative leadership and the Governor. AMM News Fa.~ ]s faxed to all AMM city managers and administrators, legislative contncts and Board members. Please share this fax wlth your mnyors, councilmember$ and staff to Itee~o them abreast of impor- tant metro city Issues. 145 tIniversiO' ,4venue We.pt St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (65l) 215-4000 Fax: (651) 281-1299 E-mail: arnm~mrnt 45. org LGA: Update The amount of new local government aid (LGA) continues to be an unresolved issue. The House has proposed an LGA increase of $98.0 million. The latest House offer also recommends that city and county road equipment and materials purchases be ex- empted from the sales tax. The House offer is an increase over ~ts original LGA proposal, The Senate on Tuesday proposed a total increase of $154,0 million or a decrease from its original position of $219.0 million. Tax Increment Financing The League of Minnesota Cities coordinated a survey of cities to determine the status of TIF districts and proposed develop- ments. Approximately fifty cities responded to the survey. The survey reported that the cities have identified 74 districts that have requested certification, negotiated or are negotiating development agreements and have or commit- ted to expend funds on public improvements and or land acquisi- tion. The information will be reviewed as the working group attempts to develop a position'on TIF.'In dis- cussing TIF the working group outlined three concepts that could assist districts in coping with the impacts of the tax reform. Among them are permitting the authority to retain all tax proceeds generated by the local tax rate and not being limited to the certified rate, extend- ing a district for up to five years and broadening the pooling rules. The concepts could also be prerequi- sites for applying for the grant program. The Senate has funded a two year $250.0 million grant program while the house has a three year $195.0 million program. I88 J0 T88 a~t uosu~tl s!t~u~14 -8114- <- xK{ ~!~ ES:BE:Z1: tBgZ IZ un.r AMM FAX June 25-29, 2001, no. 2 Association of Fletropolitan lunicipalities House and Senate 'pass tax bill begining in 2004. Apartments con- strutted after June 30, 2001 would go directly to a 1.25% class rate. The class rates for 4d apartments will be 0.9% for 2002, 1.0% for 2003, and then t.25% begining in 2004. CommericaI/industriaI property will have a 1.5% class rate for the first tier (all value up to $ t50,000) and 2.0% for the second tier (all value over $150,{)00.) Agricultural property will have a 0.55% class rate for the first tier (all value un- der $600,000) and a 1.00% class rate for the second tier (all value over $600,000). Other provisions of special interest to metro-area cities include: Levy Limits. The bill contains levy lim- its for cities wi~ populations over 2500 for taxes payable in 2002 and 2003. The 2002 levy lhuit will be the greater of ei- ther 1) atwo year adjustment to the pay- able 2000 revenue base, or 2) a one year adjustment to the actual levy for pay- able 2001, plus aids and minus specials. The adjustment factors are the IPD, which is 4.3 percent for 2001 and 3,0 percent for 2002, household growth, and half of new C/I growth. PERA Special Levy. If the state de- partments bill includes an unfunded man- date to increase the employer contribu- tion to PERA (proposed at .375 per- cent), cities and counties will be all.owed to special levy for the unfunded amount. Both the House and the Senate approved the tax bill (HF 1) by wide margins Thurs- day af~emoon. The centerpiece oft,he bill is a state take- over of the general education levy, at a cost of approximately $900 million. To help fund this state takeover, the bill cre- ates a new, state-imposed property tax levy on all C/I and cabin properties. The levy will be 5592 million in 2002, with an trease based on the implicit price de- or (IPD) in future years. Revenue m the levy growth will be dedicated to a new education funding account be- ginning ia 2004. The bill also contains considerable class rate compression. For residential home- stead and residential nonhomestead properties, the class rates will be 1.0% for the first tier (all value under $500,000) and 1.25% for the second tier (all value over $500,000). The class rate for two and three unit rental properties will be 1.5% for 2002, and then drop to 1.25% begining in 2003. The rate for apartments will be 1 .$0% · for 2002, 1.50% for 2003, and 1.25% City and To~_ §~ '-i'lL are eliminated. /IMM Ntws Fax is foxed to aII AMM cio' managerg and ad~ninistratot~, legislative contacts and Board rn~mbers. Please share this fax with your mayors, councllmembers d staff to keep them abreast of impor- t metro city issues. 145 Universl~ Avenue West St. Paul, MN $$I03-2044 Phone: (651) 215-4000 Fax.. (651) 281-1299 E. mall: a~ 45. erg Local Government Aid (LGA). An additional $140 million is appropriated for City LGA, however, the formula is modi- fied for local effort and to increase caps. Therefore, a number of cities, including several in the suburban metro area, will not only lose HACA, but will also have their LGA reduced, possibly to their 1993 aid base. Cities do have the authority, within the levy limit provisions, to levy back for lost aid. Truth in Taxation. The requirement for a hearing is dropped in 2002 and 2003 if the year to year increase is at or less than the IPD. The transit property tax levy for op- erating expenses is replaced by a statu- tory dedication of the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST). The metro share is 20.5 percent of MVST for 2002/03 ($109.8 million per year) and 22.5 percent of MVST for 2004/05 ($125.1 million per year). The capital levy for ransk is ex- tended to the entire metropolitan area. Homestead Credit. The current Edu- cation and Ag Homestead Credits are eliminated and a new Market Value Homestead Credit is created. The new credit will be equal to 0.4% of market value up to 5;304, less 0.09% times any value over $76,000. Property Tax Refund (Circuit Breaker). The maximum property tax refund for homeowners is increased from $440 to $1,450 and the maximum qualifying income is increased from $61,930 to $77,520. Jun 2B 2881 17:40:19 Via Fax -> gandis Hanson Page 003 0£ 883 continued frorn page I Limited Market Value is phased out over six years. Tax Increment Financing (THr). The Local Development Article (XV) con- tains amendments to the 'mx increment financing act, special TIF laws, amend- ments to economic development laws and the TIF grant program. The TLF act amendments include many of the tech- nical amendments contained in a previ- ous tax bill but do not include several policy amendments. Among the amend- meiats not in the bill are the pre-1990 amendments, the definition of blight and the repeal of the conclusiveness clause. The bill does continue the authority of the Office of State Auditor (OSA) to enforce the TIF Act. The LGA/HACA and local contribution are repealed. The article includes several sections re- lated to the grant program. The eom.mis- sioner of revenue will administer' the grant program, with the first grant to be made in 2003. The appropriation is $91.0 million for the first year of the grant pro- gram and $38.0 million in each subse- quent year. To apply for a grant a mu- nicipality or authority must use its avail- able TIF from all districts and take local actions as defined in the bill. The local actions are the removal of the certified tax levy and changing the fiscal dispari- ties election, if needed, to take the con- tribution from outside the district. Dis- triers for which certification was re- quested prior to August 1,2001 and have a bond or binding contract that was is- sued or approved before August l, 2001 or was issued pursuant to a binding con- tract entered into by July l, 2001 are eli- gible to apply for the grant. Items not in the tax bill include the reverse referendum provision initially in the House bill and an airport noise miti- gation proposal initially in the Senate bill. -8116- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 (952) 745-0789 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER Grego ,ry S. Nybeck June 26. 2001 Increased Water Patrol Presence for 2001 Boatin.q Season: In late M ay, two additional full-time Hennepin County sheriffs Office Water Patrol Deputies we~e placed on Lake Minnetonka to increase presence for five months. A two- year commitment, at $100,000 per year, was requested for the program, with costs to be shared by Hennepin County (50%), LMCD Member Cities (30%), and the LMCD "Save the Lake" Fund (20%). All funding was secured for this program for the 2001 Boating Season, with the exception of the City of Minnetonka. The City of Minnetonka expressed concern with the funding formula for the EMCD member cities, especia!iy since they have a limited amount of shoreline and they were requested to pay 20% of the $30,000 commitment. In April, $14,000 was received from a number of Lake Minnetonka area businesses for this project. These funds will be used to offset the funds not received from the City of Uinnetonka. In mid June, we forwarded a cover letter and contract for law enforcement services to the member cities that agreed to financially participate in this program for the 200t boating season. At the end of the boating season, we will forward an overview that provides a detailed accounting for the funds received from the 13 member cities. Please feel free to contact the office if your city has any questions regarding this program. 2001 Lake Levels: Lake levels on Lake Minnetonka in 2001 have been relatively high this spdng due to significant precipitation. Since April 30% lake levels have been at or exceeded 929.81' NGVD. At the same time last year, lake levels ranged from approximately 928.20 'to 928.30' NGVD. LMCD Code Section 3,021 has been established to provide reasonable regulation of watercraft wakes dudng pedods of "High Water". The Code states that the Executive Director shall make a "High Water Declaration" when the Lake elevation has been at or above elevation 930.0' NGVD for a period of eight consecutive days or exceeded 930.25' NGVD. From 6/14/01 through 6/20101, the lake levels on Lake Minnetonka exceeded 930.0 NGVD for six consecutive days, with a lake level reading of 929.97' NGVD on 6/21/01. Please feel free to contact the office if your city or residents have questions regarding lake levels on Lake Minnetonka. 2001 Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) Harvesting: The 2001 EWM Harvesting Program commenced on 6/15/01 with the launching of the harvesting equipment at Spring Park Bay. Harvesting is planned through mid August, with the possibility of late season harvesting depending on growth and economic variables. Harvesting priorities, which are consistent with past years, are based upon impediment to public boat navigation on the open water. The South Upper Lake Harvesting Option has been implemented in 2001, with minimal harvesting completed in Phelps and Carmans Bays because of limited weed growth because of high lake levels and other weather related variables. The operation of the EWM Harvesting Program was suspended for the week of 6/25/01 through 6/29/01 due to the limited weed growth, with harvesting planned to commence again on 7/2 and 7/3. Please feel free to contact the LMCD office if your city or residents have questions regarding the 2001 EWM Harvesting Program. 2002 LMCD Budget: In May, staff prepared the draft 2002 LMCD Budget for review by the Board and member cities. In accordance with Minnesota State Statutes 103B.635, the Board must on or before July 1 of each year prepare and submit a detailed budget of the District's needs, for the next calendar year, to the governing body of each municipality in the District with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be to be provided by each municipality. The LMCD Board has reviewed the draft 2002 LMCD Budget at its 5/23/01 and 6/13/01 Regular -8117- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER, 6/26100, PAGE 2 meetings. A meeting with city officials was held in the' LMCD office on Fdday, 618101, to receive input and comment on the draft 2002 LMCD Budget. Final Board review of the draft 2002 LMCD Budget is planned for the 6/27/01 Regular meeting, with a copy of the approved budget to be forWarded to the member cities prior to the 7/1/01 deadline. Charter Boat Meetings: For the fourth consecutive year, charter boats on Lake Minnetonka, with liquor licenses, were required to attend a mandatorY annual training session. Working with the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol, meeting dates of April 3r~ and APdl, 1'~ wei.e" scheduled to facilitate 100% attendance by the charter boat licensee or authorized representative. The discus~iOn'at these meeting focused on LMCD charter boat rules and regulations including genera responsibilities, operational rules, and related liquor rules n addition to the Water Patrol, other govem~enta~' represent~tion at these meetings included the MN' Del~artmeni'Of pUbiic S~fety and the HennePin County HeCilih' DePartment No new or renewal' liquor:licenses have b~en granted to those ~h~rter boats that did not send a repi'esentat ve to one of these meetings, · Web Page: The LMCD's WebPage, which was recently under construction, was updated and downloaded in early May. The address is: http://www.lmcd.org. -8118- BOARD MEMBERS Bert Foster Chair, Deephaven Craig Nelson Vice Chair, Spring Park Lili McMiltan Secretary, Orono Tom Skramstad Treasurer, Shorewood Andrea Ahrens Mound Bob Ambrose Wayzata Douglas E. Babcock Tonka Bay Craig Eggers Victoria Tom Gilman Excelsior Paul Knudsen Minnetrista Tom Seuntjens Minnetonka Beach Herb J. Suerth Woodland Katy Van Hercke Minnetonka Sheldon Weft Greenwood 50% Recycled Content 20% Post Consumer Waste LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 MINNETONKA BLVD., DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEPHONE 952/745-0789 · FAX 952/745-9085 June 29, 2001 Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LMCD Member Cities Greg Nybeck, Executive Director Adopted 2002 LMCD Budget Enclosed is a copy of the 2002 LMCD Budget, which was recently adopted and certified by the LMCD Board. Minnesota State Statute 103B.635, Subd. 1 requires the LMCD Board, on or before July 1 of each year, to prepare and submit a detailed budget of the District's needs for the next calendar year to the governing body of each municipality in the District with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each municipality. The 2002 LMCD Budget consists of these parts: 1. One page that outlines the city-by-city levy allocation 2. Three pages of budget detail 3. Two pages of budget assumptions 4. One page of notes (Appendix A) Let me provide some background on how LMCD activities are funded. The LMCD maintains five reserve fund accounts (Administration, EWM/Exotics, Save the Lake, New Equipment Acquisition, and Equipment Replacement). Administration, EWM Exotics, and New Equipment Acquisition funds are derived from tax dollars, which are levied to the 14 member cities. Administration and EWM/Exotics funds are used for operating purposes. New Equipment Acquisition funds have been established to either replace or refurbish depreciated capital equipment used in conjunction with the Eurasian Watermilfoil harvesting program. The levy for the adopted 2002 LMCD Budget will, therefore, be allocated for these three reserve fund accounts. The remaining two reserve funds, Save the Lake and Equipment Replacement, are funded by private donations, not from member cities' contributions. Back in the early 1990's, the member cities agreed with the LMCD to place money in reserve funds for both the Administration and EWM/Exotics programs. This was done to provide financial resources in the event that something out-of- the-ordinary occurred in a given year. The agreement stated that the Administration fund should have a six-month reserve (50% of the annual budget) and the EWM/Exotics program should have a 12-month reserve (100% of the annual budget). At year-end in 2000, the reserve fund balances for Administration and EWM/Exotics fell below these levels (a 33% reserve for the Administrative Fund, which should be 50%, and a 38% reserve for the EWM/Exotics Fund, which should be 100%). Web Page Address: http://www.lmcd.org E-mail Address: Imcd@lmcd.org -8119- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT With this background, let me explain the changes in this year's funding. The major factors in the 2002 levy increase are: · $8,500 has been budgeted for a Boat Use Study. The Boat Use Study and User Attitude Survey are done periodically (every two and four years, respectively), and have caused the LMCD budget to fluctuate. Beginning in budget year 2003, these cyclical costs will be budgeted each year, leveling out these ups and downs. The adopted 2002 LMCD Budget will be the last year where this variance should occur. · $9,378 has been budgeted to be transferred to the EWM/Exotics Reserve Fund to build it back up towards the agreed upon level as agreed to by the member cities. This contribution will get the fund up to nearly 50%, against a plan of 100%. The levy increase between 2001 and 2002 is just over 12% and the overall increase in expenses is just under 6% - the major reasons are described above. If your city has question about the adopted 2002 budget, please let me know. We are glad to discuss this further, and are required by statute to schedule a public hearing on this matter, if requested. Enclosed is a copy of the 2000 LMCD Audit that was accepted by the LMCD Board of Directors at its 4/25/01 Regular meeting. Our policy has been to provide a copy of the most recent audit after it has been accepted by the Board. On behalf of the LMCD Board, I would like to thank all 14-member communities for their continued participation and support for District related activities. Feel free to contact me at the District office if you have questions or concerns. -8120- m z Z I~m o-I ~0 888 -8121 - 000 000 000 0~00~ 000 .~ CO 0'1 COCO00 ~' z~ =5' ~ ~ ~ < ~ z ~ ~ ~ 000 00 O~ --~ 0 000 FO 000 O0 000 00 O0 000000 O0000000 O0 O0 ~ 0 O10 O0 ~0 Co ~ --~ 00 ~ (000 ~--~ 000 00 O~ 00 00 O~ O00 00 ~400 00 '~ 000000 ~.0000000 CO mO ~ 0 ~00 O0 O0 O0 O0 000000 ~b oo~ ~00 00~ ~00000~ 000 ~OO1 ~ 0 ~00 (~O1 CO0 '~0 I0 ~000000 ~00000 ~ ~000000~ -8122- [; o oo o~o~ooo o-o-o 0 O0 000 O0 000 0 00000 O0000 000 ~000000~00~0 0000000000000 I; ~ o o o ~ ~ --~ ~0000 ~,J ~ 0 ~ ~0 C0 ~.00 ~0 I; . _on ..~ .~_oo o o o o oo'o -~0~o 0 0 0 0 000 000 0 O0000 O0000 000 ~0000000000~0 0000000000000 I; 0 0 0 O~ OlO 00 O1 0 0 0 00000 0 000 000 0 000 000 00000 000 ~o~oo~o~oo~o ~0~00000000~0 0000000000000 I; 0 00000 o ooo ~oo 0 000 00000 ~00~0~0~~ ~0000000000 ~0 0000000000000 -8123- Z rn O3 o~o~ m m > o m ~ ~ooo 000 0000 000 0000 0 0000000 0 0000000 0 0000000 0~ 0000 000 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 0 0000000 0 0000000 0~ 0000 000 0000 0 0~0~00~ 0 0000000 0 0000000 0 00000 0 00000 0000000 -8124- 0 -8125- -8126- -8127- ,ABDO ABDO. EICK & MEYERS February 9, 2001 7241 Ohms Lane Suite 200 To the Board of Directors Lake Minnetouka Conservation District Deephaven, Minnesota We have audited the combined financial statements of the Lake Mirmetonka Conservation District for the year ended December 31, 2000 and have issued our report thereon dated February 9, 2001. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit. Our Responsibility under U.S. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards and Government Auditing Standards - As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable-but not absolute-assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Because of the concept of reasonable assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, fraud, or other illegal acts may exist and not be detected by us. As part of our audit, we considered the internal control of the District. Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control. However, we noted certain matters involving internal control and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the District's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in a amounts that would be material in relation to the f'mancial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all matters in internal control that might be reportable conditions and, accordingly, would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be a material weakness, as defined above. However, we noted the following reportable condition that we believe is not a material weakness. Segregation of Duties Our study and evaluation disclosed that becanse of the limited size of your office staff, your organization has limited segregation of duties. Good internal control contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that your organization is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all respects, it is/mportant, however, that you be aware of this condition. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions. We noted no instances of noncompliance. 612.835.9090 * Fax612.83521251 -8128- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 9, 2001 Page Two Significant 'Accounting Policies Management has the responsibility for selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance with the terms of our engagement letter, we will advise management about the appropriateness of account-ag policies and their application. The significant accounting policies used by the District are described in Note 1 to the combined financial statements. NO new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during 2000. We noted no transactions entered into by the District during the year that were both significant and unusual, and of which-under professional standards-we are required to inform you, or transactions for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or Accounting Estimates · Accounting estimates are an integral part of the combined financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the general-purpose financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. Significant Audit Adjustments For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a significant audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the general-purpose financial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. We did not make any material audit adjustments. Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting or auditing matter that could be significant to the general-purpose financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the District's combined financial Statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Independent Auditors We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the District's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered, no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit. - 8129- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ]February 9, 2001 Page Three Overview of Activity in the Districts Funds General Fund The general fund had expenditures in excess of revenue totaling $7,570. This decreased the fund balance to $103,730. The District has a policy of maintaining fund balance at 50% of planned expenditures. The fund balance currently is 33.2% of 2000 expenditures and transfers out, this is the second year in a row where the fund balance has dropped below the 50% target. The current levels should provide adequate working capital but any reserves for emergency needs or special projects are reduced when fund balance is below the 50% level. The decrease in 2000 resulted mainly from court fine revenue coming in under budget and prosecution expense higher than budget. The following graph shows the fund balance as it relates to expenditures over the last 4 years. General Fund Balance and Expenditures $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,0OO $50,000 Fund balance 1 Expenditures 1~7 1~8 1~9 2~0 Special Revenue Funds The following table summarizes the change in the fund balance for each Special Revenue Fund. · Fund Balance Increase Fund 12/31/00 12/31/99 (Decrease) Save the Lake New Equipment Acquisition Eurasian Milfoil Equipment Replacement $ 199,991 $ 182,095 $ 17,896 129,632 221,907 (92,275) 47,285 93,426 (46,141) 164,791 154,411 10,380 Total ~ ~41.699 ~ 651.839 $ 110.140 The new milfoil harvester was purchased out of the New Equipment Acquisition Fund. This resulted in the $92,275 decrease in Fund Balance. Higher levels of activity caused the Milfoil Fund to spend $38,101 more than what was budgeted. Overall, the Fund Balance decr~ $46,141. The fund balance is 33% of 2000 expenditures, but the 2001 budget calls for expenditures and transfers of $124,000. The current fund balance is 38% of the 2001 budget. The District has a policy of maintaining a reserve of 100% of planned expenditures in the Milfoil fund. This target may be higher then what is actually needed given the cash flow pattern of the Milfoil fund. The District should evaluate the level needed and reafftrm the current policy or set a new lower target since the balance has decreased over the past few years. -8130- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 9, 2001 Page Four Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements - and Management's Discussion and Analysis - for State and Local Governments GASB Statement No. 34 is the result of an almost decade-Prior effort by GASB to reexamine the financial reporting model for state and local governments. The most notable change is the presentation of a set of highly aggregated, "full accrual" financial statements. At the same time, however, the Statement retains many familiar features of current governmental financial reporting, in particular fund-based financial statements. State and local governmental financial statement preparers and auditors will need to comprehend and implement a vast number of changes in accounting and financial reporting. They will have to explain those changes to persons who are unfamiliar with the particulars of accounting, much less the unique area of state and local governmental accounting. The following are some specific areas that need to be addressed with the implementation of this new statement: Timeline GASB Statement No. 34 is effective in three phases based on the total annual revenues of the primary government's governmental and proprietarg funds, although earlier application is encouraged. For this purpose, revenues include all revenues except for other financing sources and certain extraordinary items. The District is considered to be phase 3. Therefore, the District is required to implement GASB Statement No. 34 for the calendar year ending 2004. Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) MD&A gives an objective and easily readable analysis of a government's financial activities based on currently known facts, decisions, or conditions. It presents short- and Prior-term analyses of the government's activities, compares current-year results with those of the prior year, and discusses the positive and negative aspects of that comparison. Government-wide Financial Statements The government-wide financial statements are (1) a statement of net assets and (2) a statement of activities. The statement of net assets presents the government's financial position at a point in time (like a balance sheet does); the statement of activities presents its activities during a period (like an operating statement does). These statements present highly aggregated information for the overall government; they do not display individual funds or fund types. They also present financial information in separate rows and columns for the (1) primary government's aggregate governmental activities, (2) primary government's aggregate business-type activities, (3) total primary government, and (4) discretely presented component units. Capital Assets Capital assets are tangible and intangible assets that are used in operations that have initial useful Lives longer than one year. They include land and improvements, easements, buildings and improvements, equipment, and works of art and historical treasures. Capital assets also include infrastructure assets - normally stationary capital assets that can be preserved for Significantly greater number of years than most Capital assets. Infrastructure assets include roads, bridges and tunnels; water, sewer and drainage systems; dams; lighting systems; and buildings that are an ancillary part of a network of infrastructure assets. Capital assets are reported in the statement of net assets at historical cost (or estimated fair value, if donated) and net of accumulated depreciation. They are depreciated in the statement of activities over their estimated useful lives. -8131 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 9, 2001 Page Five Infrastructure Assets GASB Statement No. 34 applies prospectively to all general infrastructure assets beginning at the effective dates of the Statement (or earlier, if the statement is implemented earlier). Governments are also encouraged to apply the Statement retroactively to all existing major general infrasmacture assets at that time. However, phase 1,2 governments need not retroactively report those assets until calendar year 2006, 2007 - four years after their required implementation of Statement No. 34. Phase 3 governments are encouraged but not required to report major general infrastructure assets retroactively. If there are inadequate records of the actual historical cost of existing general infrastructure assets, governments can est/mate historical cost. They also may limit retroactive application to only those major general infrastructure assets that were acquired or significantly reconstructed, or that received significant improvements, in fiscal years ending after June 30, 1980. The above gives you some general information on GASB Statement No. 34 implementation. We intend to educate and work with all of our clients in developing a plan to implement this new statement. As a result of implementing this statement, there will no doubt be additional fees for our services. These expected increases will most likely result from additional time spent in the areas of(l) training, (2) account structure modifications to provide information necessary to prepare financial statements, (3) accounting for fixed assets, infrasmacture assets and related depreciation, and (4) financial statement preparation. The more that the District staff can do in the areas of fixed'~sset accounting and proper account structure will help in reducing these costs. We will help you as much as possible to accomplish this. This report is intended solely for the use of management. The comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature, and should be read in this context. Our audit would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related data. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the items contained in this letter, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. We wish to thank you for the oppommity to be of service and for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by your staff. February 9, 2001 Minneapolis, Minnesota ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Certified Public Accountants -8132- I I I I ! I I I I 10 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 -8133- General Purpose Financial Statements Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Group Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance ~ All Governmental Fund Types Combined Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General and Budgeted Special Revenue Funds Notes to Financial Statements Combining and Individual Fund Statements Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance o Budget and Actual Save the Lake Fund Eurasian Milfoil Fund OTHER REPORTS Report on Compliance and on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards Independent Auditor's Report on Legal Compliance -8134- 3-4 5 6-7 8-13 14- 15 16- 17 18 19 20 - 21 22 I I I I I I I I I I I INTRODUCTORY SECTION LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 -8135- NalTle Douglas Babcock Bert Foster Eugene Partyka Craig Nelson Andrea Ahrens Bob Ambrose Kent Dahlen Tom Gilman Lili McMillan Tom Skramstad Herb Suerth Sheldon Wert Kat~ Van Hercke Craig Eggers LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS DECEMBER 31, 2000 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Member CiW Tonka Bay Deephaven Mirmetrista Spring Park Mound Wayzata Minnetonka Beach Excelsior Orono Shorewood Woodland Greenwood Mirmetonka Victoria -1- -8136- Position on Board Chair Vice-Chair Secreta~ Treasurer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer i I I I i I I I I I i FINANCIAL SECTION LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 -8137- I ABDO [ ABDO EICK & I MEYERS 72~1 Ohms Lane Suite 200 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT Board of Directors Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Deephaven, Minnesota We have audited the accompanying general purpose financial statements of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Deephaven, Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 as hsted in the table of contents. These general purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these general purpose financial statements based on our audit. Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing th~ accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall general purpose financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Because the District does not maintain general fixed asset records which provide complete accounting control over quantities and original costs of all equipment, it is impracticable to audit the accompanying General Fixed Assets Account Group, and therefore, we express no opinion on it. In our opinion, except for the effects on the general purpose financial statements of such adjustments, if any, as might have been determined to be necessary had we audited the General Fixed Assets Account Group, the general purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District at December 31, 2000 and the results of its operations for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated February 9, 2001 on our consideration of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its. compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. That report is an integral part of an audit conducted in accordance with the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, and in considering the results of the audit, should be read along with the independent auditors' report. Our audit was conducted for the purPose of forming an opinion on the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining and individual fund financial statements listed in the table of contents are presented for the purpose of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general purpose financial statements of the Lake Miunetonka Conservation District. Such infonmtion has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the general purpose financial statements taken as a whole. February 9, 2001 Minneapolis, Minnesota ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Certified Public Accountants 612.1385.9090 · F~x612.835.3261 -8138- i GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT _ DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 -8139- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT COM]BINED BALANCE SHEET ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUP DECElvfBER 31, 2000 (With comparative totals for December 31, 1999) ASSETS Cash and temporary investments Due from other governments Rent deposit Fixed assets TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES, FUND BALANCE AND OTHER CREDITS LIABILITIES Salaries and wages payable Accounts payable Prepaid rent Deferred revenue TOTAL LIABILITIES FUND BALANCE AND OTHER CREDITS Investment in general fixed assets Fund balance Unreserved Designated Milfoil Equipment replacement Purchases from donated funds Undesignated TOTAL FUND BALANCE AND OTHER CREDITS TOTAL LIABILITIES, FUND BALANCE AND OTHER CREDITS See Notes to Financial Statements. -3- -8140- Governmental Fund Types Special General Revenue 159,335 $ 538,997 21,381 3,229 1,994 $ 182,710 $ 542,226 3,195 $ 6,474 23,141 46,170 527 78,980 527 47,285 294,423 199,991 103,730 103,730 541,699 $ 182,710 $ 542,226 Account Group General Fixed Assets (Unaudited) Totals (Memorandum Only) 2000 1999 $ - $ 698,332 $ 852,025 24,610 2,000 - 1,994 1,994 536,997 536,997 433,117 $ 536,997 $ 1,261,933 $ 1,289,136 3,195 $ 848 7,001 15,956 23,141 31,554 46,170 44,522 79,507 92,880 536,997 536,997 433,117 47,285 93,426 294,423 376,318 199,991 182,095 103,730 111,300 536,997 1,182,426 1,196,256 $ 536,997 $ 1,261,933 $ 1,289,136 -8141 - LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE ALL GOVERNMENTAL FUND TYPES YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 (With comparative totals for the year ended December 31, 1999) REVENUE Revenue from membership dues Revenue from public agencies Revenue from state sources Licenses and perm/ts Fines and forfeits Contributions and donations Interest on investments Miscellaneous Totals Special (Memorandum Only) General Revenue 2000 1999 128,679 $ 62,001 $ 190,680 $ 151,210 24,329 24,329 23,854 13,437 13,437 125,080 125,080 110,257 22,519 22,519 24,616 - 31,395 31,395 25;836 12,794 42,630 55,424 46, I86 2,518 30 2,548 1,770 TOTAL REVENUE 305,027 160,385 465,412 383,729 EXPENDITURES Current Personal services Operating supplies Public services Repair and maintenance Contract fees Legal fees Track service Other services Other charge's Capital outlay 129,348 51,183 180,531 152,725 13,476 10,409 23,885 20,081 22,167 22,167 25,616 439 15,812 16,251 18,123 25,315 25,315 21,247 74,482 74,482 68,834 38,841 38,841 14,175 44,620 44,620 16,816 46,829 2,918 49,747 49,212 3,403 103,880 107,283 545 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 312,597 270,525 583,122 387,374 EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfer in Operating transfer out (7,570) (110,140) (117,710) (3,645) 35,000 (35,000) TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES (7,570) (110,140) (117,710) (3,645) FUND BALANCE, JANUARY 1 111,300 651,839 763,139 766,784 FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 $ 103,730 $ 541,699 $ 645,429 $ 763,139 See notes to Financial Statements. -5- -8142- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMBNT OF RBVENUB~ EXPENDITURBS AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL AND BUDGETED SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS YBAR BNDBD DBCBMBBR 31, 2000 KEVENLrE Revenue from membership dues Revenue from public agencies Revenue from state sources Licenses and perm/ts Fines and forfeits Contributions and donations Interest on investments Miscellaneous TOTAL REVBNUE EXPENDITURES Current Personal services Operating supplies Public services Repair and maintenance Contract fees Legal fees Track service Other services Other charges Capital outlay TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES General Fund Budget Actual $ 128,679 $ 128,679 13,437 107,000 125,080 40,000 22,519 8,000 12,794 2,000 2,518 Variance- Favorable (Unfavorable) 13,437 18,080 (17,481) 4,794 518 285,679 305,027 19,348 125,479 129,348 (3,869) 12,000 13,476 (1,476) 2,000 439 1,561 60,000 74,482 (14,482) 26,000 44,620 (18,620) 52,700 46,829 5,871 7,500 3,403 4,097 285,679 312,597 (26,918) $ (7,570) $ (7,570) FUND BALANCE, JANUARY 1 FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 111,300 $ 103,730 See Notes to Financial Statements. -6- -8143- Budgeted Special Revenue Funds ( See Note 2B) Budget 62,000 24,000 28,000 15,000 Acmal Variance- Favorable (Unfavorable) 62,001 $ 1 24,329 329 31,395 3,395 20,645 5,645 30 30 129,000 138,400 9,400 28,000 51,183 (23,183) 6,250 10,409 (4,159) 23,400 22,167 1,233 15,000 15,812 (812) 20,000 25,315 (5,315) 16,000 38,841 (22,841) 23,000 2,918 20,082 7,350 7,350 139,000 166,645 $ (10,000) (28,245) 276,342 $ 248,097 (27,645) $ (18,245) -7- -8144- Note 1: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NOTB~ TO ~IN/~NCIAL gTATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2000 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Reporting Entity The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District was established under Laws 1967, Chapter 907 and Laws 1969, Chapter 272 of the Minnesota Statutes and consists of a 14 member Board of Directors composed of representatives from each member city. The Districts' purpose is to regulate and monitor the use of Lake Miunetonka. The Board exercises legislative authority and determines all matters of policy. The Board appoints personnel responsible for the proper administration of all affairs relating to the District's activities. The District does not have any component units requiring either blended or discrete presentation. B. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Basis of Presentation The accounts of the District are organized and operated on the basis of funds and account groups. A fund is an independent fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts. Fund accounting segregates funds according to their intended purpose and is used to aid management in demonstrating compliance with finance- related legal and contractual provisions. The minimum number of funds are maintained consistent with legal and managerial requirements. Account groups are a reporting device to account for certain assets and liabilities of the governmental funds not recorded directly in those funds. The District has the following fund types and account group: Governmental funds are used to account for the District's general government activities. Governmental fund types use the flow of current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when susceptible to accrual (i.e., when they are "measurable and available"). "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined, and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. The District considers all revenues available if they are collected within 60 days after year end. Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred. Fines, dues, licenses and interest become measurable and available when cash is received by the government and are recogrfized as revenue at that time. The preparation of general purpose financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Entitlements and shared revenues are recorded at the time of receipt or earlier ff the suscept/ble to accrual criteria are met. Expenditure driven grants are recognized as revenue when the qualifying expenditures have been incurred and all other grant requirements have been met. Governmental funds include the following fund types: The general fund is the District's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resource, s of the District, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The special revenue funds account for revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes (not including major capital projects). These funds include the Save the Lake Fund, Eurasian Milfoil Fund, New Equipment Acquisition Fund and the Equipment Replacement Fund. The Save the Lake Fund and the New Equipment Acquisition Funds are funded only through donations and interest income. Account Group. The general fixed assets account group (unaudited) is used to account for fzxed assets accounted for in governmental funds. -8- -8145- Note 1: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2000 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED C. Assets, Liabilities and Equity Deposits and Investments The District's cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits and short term investments with original maturities ofttLree montl~ or less from the date of acquisition. State statutes authorize the District to invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, commercial paper, corporate bonds, repurchase agreements and shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and whose only investments are obligations guaranteed by the United, States of Amgerica and its agencies. Cash balances from all funds are pooled and invested, to the extent available, in certificates of deposit and other authorized investments. Earnings from such investments are allocated on the basis of applicable participation by each of the funds. Receivables and Payables Transactions between funds that are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements outstanding at the end of the fiscal year are referred to as either "interfund receivables/payables" (i.e., the current portion ofinterfund loans) or "advances-to/from other funds" (i.e., the non-current portion of interfund loans). All other outstanding balances between funds are reported as "due to/from other funds". Prepaid Items Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items. Fixed Assets (Unaudited) Fixed assets used in governmental fund types of the District are recorded in the general fixed assets account group at cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or comtmcted. Donated fixed assets are recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of donation. Assets in the general fixed assets account group are not depreciated. Interest incurred during construction is not capitalized on general fixed assets. Because the District does not maintain general fixed assets records, the account group is unaudited. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets' lives are not included in the general fixed assets group. Compensated Absences It is the District's policy to permit employees to accumulate a limited mount of earned but unused vacation, which, with Board discretion, may be paid to the employee upon separation. Because no payout policy is established, no liability is recognized in the earning fund. The District also has a policy that allows an employee to accumulate sick leave after five years of service at rates ranging from 30 to 50 percent up to 160 to 1,320 hours. This is payable upon termination. At December 31, 1999, there were no material balances to be accrued. Fund Equity Designations of fund balance represent tentative management plans that are subject to change. Prepaid Rent Prepaid rent resulted from an advance from the prior lessor to compensate the District for canceling their lease. The advance is to be used to reduce the rent expense incurred over the life of the new lease. -9- -8146- Note Note 2: Note 3: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2000 SU1VIMAR¥ OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONTINUED Memorandum Only - Total Columns Total columns on the general purpose financial statements are captioned as "memorandum only" because they do not represent consolidated fmancial information and are presented only to facilitate financial analysis. The columns do not present information that reflects financial position, results of operations or cash flows in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Inteffund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. Comparative Data/Reclassifications Comparative total data for the prior year have been presented in the selected sections of the accompanying financial statements in order to provide an understanding of changes in the District's financial position and operations. Also, certain mounts presented ia the prior year data have been reclassified in order to be consistent with the current year's presentation. STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY A. Budgetary Information The Board must, on or before July 1 each year, prepare and submit a detailed budget of the District's needs for the next calendar year to the governing body of each city in. the District with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each city. The governing body of each city in the District shall review the budget and the Board, upon notice from a city, must hear objections to the budget. After the hearing, the Board may modify or amend the budget. Notice must be given to the city of modifications or amendments. B. Statement of Revenue and Expenditures - Budget and Actual Reconciliation The Agency did not budget for all Special Revenue Funds and, accordingly, the applicable columns of the Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual, All Governmental Fund Types, exclude amounts relating to unbudgeted funds. A reconciliation of actual results for budgeted and unbudgeted Special Revenue Funds follows: Special Revenue Funds Budgeted funds Unbudgeted funds New Equipment Acquisition Equipment Replacement Revenue Expen~tures $ 138,400 $ 166,645 $ 11,605 103,880 10,380 - Total $ 160.385 ~ $ Other Financing Sources (Uses) DETAILED NOTES ON ACCOUNTS A. Deposits and Investments Cash balances of the District's funds are combined (pooled) and invested to the extent available in various investments authorized by Minnesota State Statutes. Each fund's portion of this pool (or pools) is displayed on the financial statements as "cash and temporary investments". For purposes of identifying the risk of investing public funds, the balances are categorized as follows: Deposits In accordance with Minuesota Statutes, the District maintains deposits at those depository banks, all of which are members of the Federal Reserve System. -10- -8147- Note 3: LAKE MINNETONK.A CONSERVATION DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2000 DETAILED NOTES ON ACCOUNTS-CONTINUED Minnesota Statutes require that all District deposits be protected by insurance, surety bond or collateral., The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by/nsurance or bonds (140% in the case of mortgage notes pledged). Authorized collateral includes the legal investments described below, as well as certain first mortgage notes, and certain other State or local government obligations. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping by the District or in a financial institution other than that furnishing the collateral. At year end, the District's carrying mount of deposits was $698,332 and the bank balance was $704,119. The entire bank balance was covered by federal depository insurance. B. Due from Other Governments The summary of all amounts due from other governments as of December 31, 2000 is as follows Fund State CounW Ci_ty Total General Fund $ 13,437 $ 1,245 $ 6,699 $ 21,381 Special Revenue Funds - - 3,229 3,229 Total $ 13:437 $ 1.245 $ 9,928 $ 24:610 C. Fixed Assets A summary of changes in general fixed assets (unaudited) for the year ended December 31, 2000 is as follows: Balance Balance Beginning End of Year Additions of Year General fixed assets (unaudited) $ 433,117 $103:880 $ 536.997 Deferred Revenue Deferred revenue at December 31, 2000 is comprised of the following: Licenses paid in advance $ 46,170 Leases On August 21, 1999 the District entered into a lease for office space. The lease is payable monthly for the five year period ending August 31, 2003. The future obligations under the lease agreement are set forth below: 2001 $ 25,786 2002 26,583 2003 18,077 Total . $ 70.446 Rent expense for 2000 and 1999 was $16,696 and $15,952, respectively. -11- -8148- Note 3: Note 4: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT !qOTE~ TO Fi'NAlqCIAL ~TA.TEMENT~ DECEMBER 31, 2000 DETAILED NOTES ON ACCOUNTS-CONTINUED F. Fund Balance Designations Certain designations have been made in the following funds: Fund Balance - Designated Special Revenue Funds Milfoil program expenditures Equipment replacement Purchases from donated funds $ 47,285 294,423 199,991 Total $ 541.699 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE A. Plan Description All full-time and certain part-time employees of the District are covered by defined benefit plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PEP, A). PERA administers the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERF) which is a cost-sharing, multiple-employer retirement plan. This plan is established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors upon death of eligible members. Benefits are established by State Statute, and vest after three years of credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERF's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of the step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7 percent for each remaining year. The annuity actual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years and 1.7 percent for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7 percent of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7 percent for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For PERF members whose annuity is calculated using Method 1, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. A reduced retirement annuity is also available to eligible members ~eeking early retirement. There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A normal annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree -- no survivor annuity is payable. There are also various types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will reduce the monthly normal annuity mount, because the anmlity is payable over joint lives. Members may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of contributions are available at any time to members who leave public service, but before retirement benefits begin. The benefit provisions stated in the previous paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. PERA issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for PERF. That report may be obtained by writing to PEP, A, 514 St. Peter Street, #200, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 or by calling (651) 296-7460 or 1-800-652-9026. t -12- -8149- Note 4: Note 5: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2000 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE - CONTINUED B. Funding Policy Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. These statutes are established and amended by the state legislature. The District makes annual contributions to the pension plans equal to the amount required by state statutes. PERF Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan members are required to contribute 8.75 percent and 4.75 percent, respectively, of their annual covered salary. The District is required to contribute the following percentages of annual covered payroll: 11.43 percent for Basic Plan PERF members and 5.18 percent for Coordinated Plan PERF members. The District's contributions for the years ending December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were $5,872, $4,707 and $4,949, respectively. The City's contributions were equal to the contractually required contributions for each year as set by state statutes. OTHER INFORMATION Risk Management The District is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters for which the District carries insurance. The District obtains insurance through participation in the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) which is a risk sharing pool with approximately 800 other governmental units. The District pays an annual premium to LMCIT for its workers compensation and property and casualty insurance. The LMCIT is self sustaining through member premiums and w/il re/asure for claims above a prescribed dollar amount for each insurance event. Settled claims have not exceeded the District's coverage in any of the past three fiscal years. Liabilities are reported when it is probable that a loss has occurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Aa excess coverage insurance policy covers individual claims in excess of $1,000,000. Liabilities, if any, include an amount for claims that have been incurred but not reported (IBNRs). The District's management is not aware of any incurred but not reported claims. -13- -8150- I i I I I I I 1o COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 -8151 - LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT SPECIAL KEVENUE FUNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET DECEMBEK 31, 2000 (With comparative totals for December 31, 1999) ASSETS Cash and temporary investments Due f~om other governments TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE LIABILITIES Accounts payable FUND BALANCE Unreserved Designated Mi[foil Equipment replacement Purchases from donated funds TOTAL FUND BALANCE TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Revenue Provided by Donations New Equipment Save the Lake Acquisition $ 200,513 $ 129,632 $ 200,513 $ 129,6'32 $ 522 $ 199,991 199,991 $ 200,513 129,632 129,632 $ 129,632 i i 1 ! I -14- -8152- Revenue Provided b7 Dues E~asian Equipment Milfoil Replacement $ 44,061 $ 164,791 3,229 $ 47,290 $ 164,791 Totals 2000 1999 $ 538,997 $ 652,124 3,229 $ 542,226 $ 652,124 $ 285 $ 5 $ - $ 527 47,285 47,285 93,426 - 164,791 294,423 376,318 - 199,991 182,095 47,285 164,791 541,699 651,839 $ 47,290 $ 164,791 $ 542,226 $ 652,124 -15- -8153- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 (With comparative totals for the year ended December 31, 1999) REVENUE Revenue from membership dues Revenue from public agencies Contributions and donations Interest on investments Miscellaneous Revenue Provided by Donations New Equipment Save the Lake Acquisition 31,395 - 11,015 11,605 30 - l I I ! I i TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES Current Personal services Operating supplies Public services Repair and maintenance Contract fees Truck service Other services Other charges Capital outlay TOTAL EXPENDITURES EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfer in Operating transfer out TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES FUND BALANCE, JANUARY 1 FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 -16- -8154- 42,440 11,605 2,377 22,167 24,544 17,896 17,896 182,095 $ 199,991 103,880 103,880 (92,275) (92,275) 221,907 $ 129,632 I I I I I I I il I ! ! I Revenue Provided by Dues Eurasian Equipment Milfoil Replacement Totals 2000 1999 $ 62,001 $ $ 62;001 $ 42,001 24,329 24,329 23,854 - 31,395 25,836 9,630 10,380 42,630 36,235 30 95,960 10,380 160,385 127,926 51,183 8,032 15,812 25,315 38,841 2,918 51,183 26,902 10,409 7,617 22,167 25,616 15,812 16,753 25,315 21,247 38,841 14,175 2,120 2,918 9,911 103,880 142,101 270,525 124,341 (46,141) 10,380 (110,140) 3,585 35,000 (35,000) (46,141) 10,380 (110,140) 3,585 93,426 154,411 651,839 648,254 $ 47,285 $ 164,791 $ 541,699 $ 651,839 -17- -8155- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL SAVE THE LAKE FUND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 (With comparative actual amounts for the year ended December 31, 1999) REVENUE Contributions and donations Interest on investments Miscellaneous 2000 Budget 28,000 7,000 Actual $ 31,395 11,015 30 Variance - Favorable (Unfavorable) $ 3,395 4,015 30 TOTAL R_EVENLrE 1999 EXPENDITURES Current Operating supplies Public services Capital outlay Actual TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 25,836 8,384 EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE, JANUARY 1 35,000 42,440 7,440 34,220 FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 4,250 2,377 1,873 23,400 22,167 1,233 7,350 - 7,350 35,000 24,544 10,456 $ - 17,896 $ 17,896 182,095 $ 199,991 2,276 25,616 27,892 6,328 175,767 $ 182,095 -18- -8156- 1o LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT STATEMENT OF RBVEHUE, EXPE~,IDITIJ-R_ES AND CttAiNGES IN FUND BALANCE BUDGET AND ACTUAL EURASIAN MILFOIL FUND YEAR ENDED DECElVIBER 31, 2000 (With comparative actual amounts for the year ended December 31, 1999) REVENUE Revenue from membership dues Revenue from pubhc agencies Interest on investments 2000 Budget Actual Variance - Favorable (Unfavorable) 62,000 $ 62,001 24,000 24,329 8,000 9,630 1 329 1,630 TOT AL REVENUE 1999 EXPENDITURES Current Personal services Operating supplies Repair and maintenance Contract fees Truck service Other services Other charges TOTAL EXPENDITURES Actual 42,001 23,854 8,829 EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 94,000 95,960 1,960 74,684 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Operating transfers out EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES OVER EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 28,000 51,183 (23,183) 26,902 2,000 8,032 (6,032) 5,341 15,000 15,812 (812) 16,753 20,000 25,315 (5,315) 21,247 16,000 38,841 (22,841) 14,175 - - 2,120 23,000 2,918 20,082 9,911 104,000 142,101 (38,101) 96,449 FUND BALANCE, JANUARY 1 (10,000) (46,141) (36,141) (21,765) FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 -19- -8157- $ (10,000) (46,141) $ (36,141) 93,426 $ 47,285 (35,000) (56,765) 150,191 $ 93,426 OTHER REPORTS LAKE M~rNETO~ CONSERVATION DISTRICT DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 -8158- A_BDO EIC & 724,1 Ohms Lane Suite 200 ~.~, ~ ss4~ REPORT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT A UDITiNG STANDARDS Board of Directors Lake Mirmetonka Conservation District Deephaven, Minnesota ..~ We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Deephaven, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 and have issued our report thereon dated February 9, 2001. In our report, our opinion was qualified because the General Fixed Assets Account Group was not audited. We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Compliance As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the District's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the District's internal control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control over financial reporting. However, we noted certain matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control over financial reporting that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the District's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. 612~L5.9090 ' Fax6123353261 -20- -8159- Page Two Our study and evaluation disclosed that because of the limited size of your office staff, your organization has limited segregation of duties. A good internal control structure contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that your organization is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all respects, it is important, however, that you be aware of this reportable condition. A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing, their assigned functions. Our consideration of the internal control over financial reporting would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control that might be reportable conditions and, accordingly, would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be material weaknesses. However, we believe the reportable condition described above is not a material weakness. We also noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to management of the District in a separate letter dated February 9, 2001. This report is intended for the information of the Board, management and the Office of the State Auditor, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. February 9, 2001 A.BDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota Certified Public Accountants -21- -8160- INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON LEGAL COMPLIANCE Board of Directors Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Deephaven, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Deepl3a_ven, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated February 9, 2001. In our report, our opinion was qualified because the General Fixed Assets Account Group was not audited. We conducted our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted auditing standards and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government promulgated by the Legal Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minnesota Statute Sec. 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government covers five main categories of comphance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness and claims and disbursements. Our study included all of the listed categories. The results of our tests indicate that for the items tested, the District complied with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions. Further, for the items not tested, based on our audit and the procedures referred to above, nothing came to our attention to indicate that the District had not complied with such legal provisions. This report is intended for the information of the Board, management and the Office of the State Auditor, and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. February 9, 2001 ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota Certified Public Accountants 612.835.9090 · F~612.835B261 -22- -8161 - LEN HARRELL Chief of Police TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EM ERG ENCY 911 Kandis Hanson ~ ChiefLen Harre ~1~" Monthly Report f6r June, 2001 STATISTI.CS' The month of June, There were 50 Part included. 1 criminal vehicle theft, and 36 larcenies. service during the Those offenses 11 burglary, 1 There were 103 Part II Those offenses 3 child abuse, 3 2 narcotics, 14 liquor , domestics (4 with assaults), '3'~sment, and,40 o~ offenses~ issued to for felony and 4 The injuries. There were 34 Mound assisted assistance on 6 -8162- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT . June, 2001 II. ,INVESTIGATIONS The Investigators worked on 3 child protection issues and 1 criminal sexual conduct case in June. Other cases included robbery, burglary, assault, theft, absenting, damage to property, fraud, violation of order for protection, NSF checks, fleeing police, narcotics violation, trespass, harassment, weapon on school grounds, vandalism, curfew, and absenting. Formal complaints were issued for gross misdemeanor DWI's, theft, assault, domestic assault, violation of an order for protection, interfere with 911 call, worthless check, driving after revocation, marijuana in a motor vehicle, gross misdemeanor driving after cancellation, seasonal weight restrictions, possession of drag paraphernalia, and barking dog. IH. pERSONNEL/STAFFING The department used approximately 101 hours of overtime during the month of June. Officers used 14.5 hours of comp-time, 84 hours of sick time, and 122.5 hours of vacation and 13 holiday. Officers earned 41 hours of comp time. Mound City Days accounted for the large overtime accumulation. IV. TRAINING Two officers attended emergency driving school and the department provided in-service defensive tactics training in June. V. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER CSO Salter handled 355 calls for service including 33 animal complaints, 60 ordinance violations, and 262 miscellaneous calls. Three citations were issued. VI. ,RESERVES The Reserves provided 190.5 hours of service to the community in June. Again, their dedication and support assisted in providing the excellem coverage for the events for Mound City Days. -8163- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT JUNE 2001 OFFENSES CLEARED EXCEPT- CLEAP~D BY ARI~STED I~EPORTED UNFOUNDED CLEARED ARREST ADULT J~V PART I CRIMES Homicide Criminal Sexual Conduct Robbery Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Vehicle Theft Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 36 1 2 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PART !I CRIMES Child Abuse/Neglect Forgery/NSF Checks Criminal Damage to Property Weapons Narcotic Laws Liquor Laws DWI Simple Assault Domestic Assault Domestic (No Assault) Harassment Juvenile Status Offenses Public Peace Trespassing All Other Offenses 50 I 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 1 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 21 0 2 4 1 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 14 0 0 14 16 4 5 0 0 5 5 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 20 0 1 17 0 19 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 3 17 0 0 6 5 1 TOTAL 103 4 8 58 35 40 PART II & PART IV Property Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Medicals Animal Complaints Mutual Aid Other General Investigations TOTAL 11 3 0 34 54 20 883 1,005 HCCP Inspections 2 60 TOTAL 1,220 10 6O 35 42 -8164- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT JUNE 2001 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY Hazardous Citations Non-Hazardous Citations Hazardous Warnings Non-Hazardous Warnings Verbal Warnings Parking Citations DWI Over .10 Property Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Adult Felony Arrests Adult Misdemeanor Arrests Juvenile Felony Arrests Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests Part I Offenses Part II Offenses Medicals Animal Complaints Ordinance Violations Other Public Contacts THIS YEA/{ TO I2~ST YEA/{ MONTH DATE TO DATE 39 328 680 63 224 165 5 87 160 31 290 394 71 424 505 30 335 162 5 39 36 5 38 31 11 57 58 3 9 17 0 0 1 2 13 7 39 193 167 3 9 t0 41 115 59 50 208 120 103 415 345 34 157 173 54 300 327 60 195 257 883 3,422 2,433 TOTAJ~ Assists Follow-Ups HCCP Mutual Aid Given Mutal Aid Requested 1,532 6,858 6,107 44 241 441 31 373 222 2 22 30 20 74 123 6 36 44 - 8165- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT JUNE 2001 CITATIONS DWI More Than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired or No Plates Stop Arm Violations Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Code Enforcement Seat Belt Overweight Vehicles Miscellaneous Tags TOTAL ADULT 5 5 2 4 2 31 7 0 23 0 1 0 3 0 7 0 0 30 2 5 2 1 0 139 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 -8166- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ~3NE 200! WARNINGS Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Window Tint Miscellaneous TOTAL WARRANT ARRESTS Felony Misdemeanor Adult 14 14 2 0 5 34 0 0 0 13 82 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -8167- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com To: From: Re: Date: Mayor, Council, City Manager Gino Businaro c'~i 5, Coordinated Pool CDBG Program July 5, 2001 Attached please find a letter from James Ford, the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated Pool CDBG Program Coordinator. Also included is the application material that was sent out in January of this year, and the most recent Status Reports from the county. The CDBG Grant amounts given to the Senior Community Services/Westonka CTR from Grant Year 1992 to Grant Year 1999 are as follows: 1992 21,565 1993 22,428 1994 24,670 1995 8,669 1996 8,025 1997 8,025 1998 8,025 1999 7,757 Let me know if you need additional information or assistance on this matter. Hennepin County Office Of Planning & Development Development Planning Unit 952-541-7080, Phone 10709 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 260 952-541-7090, Fax Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305 952-541-7981 ,TDD/TTY www. co.hennepin.mn.us June 29,2001 Mr. Gino Businaro Finance Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Hennepin County Consolidated Pool CDBG Program Dear Mr. Businaro: Per your conversation with Rod Waara, I am attaching a copy of the 2001 Consolidated Pool Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application material. This packet provides a summary of the Consolidated Pool process. The purpose of the Consolidated Pool was to offer smaller cities the opportunity to have access to larger sums of funding for their projects than they would have through the allocation approach. The process requires that the cities submit applications to a Consolidated Pool selection committee that ranks projects against a set of review criteria and prepares recommendations to the county board for inclusion in the annual Action Plan (application). In Program Year 2000, Mound applied for and received funding for the new Westonka Senior Center. Mound residents have also been receiving residential rehabilitation assistance and have been benefiting from public services funded by the Consolidated Pool. Following the deliberations over 2001 funding, the Committee indicated that they wished to evaluate the Consolidated Pool process. Program Year 2001 marks the fifth year of the Consolidated Pool process. The biggest concern--although there were several--was the number of communities that had not applied for or received CDBG funding. Their response was to invite all Consolidated Pool communities to one of two meetings to discuss this problem and to explore potential projects. To their and my dismay, no one from any of the Consolidated Pool communities showed up except the committee members themselves. Based upon the lack of response to these meetings, I will be making individual appointments to speak with staff from all the Consolidated Pool communities as soon as practicable. I am sorry I did not get to speak with you directly, but please feel free to contact me (952-541- 7091) with any questions or if there is anything I can do to assist you. es M. Fo~'d' ~C~ An Equal Opportunity Employer - 8169- Recyc/e aper mo DATE: January 12, 2001 TO: Urban Hennepin County Consolidated Pool Communities FROM: Rod Waara, Administrative Manager Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development SUBJECT: 2001 Urban Hermepin County Consolidated Pool CDBG Program Accompanying is the 2001 Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program planning packet for Consolidated Pool communities. The following items have been included to assist communities in the process of selecting activities for CDBG funding: 2001 Consolidated Plan Schedule Map of Consolidated Pool Communities Priority Summary and HUD Table 2A-B List of CDBG Eligible Activities Application Form Consolidated Pool Application Review Criteria Sample Resolution The preliminary 2001 Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program allocation is $3.66 million. Note: This is not the final amount. Cities will be notified of the final amount as soon as it is available from HUD. Recaptured 1998 CDBG funds totaling $47,834 have been added to the community planning allocations. All cities that had funds recaptured have been notified. CONSOLIDATED POOL This is the fifth year of the Consolidated Pool process and the second year of the 2000-2002 Joint Cooperation Agreement. Under this agreement, planning allocations to communities that would receive $75,000 or less have been placed into a Consolidated Pool. In accordance with this agreement, a total of $452,781 in CDBG funding has been made available for Consolidated Pool communities. The twenty- nine communities included in the Pool are identified on the enclosed map. SELECTION COMMITTEE A selection committee, comprised of representatives from Consolidated Pool cities, has been created to assist with the application process. The committee will review applications and prepare funding recommendations to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Hennepin County Office of Planning & Development, Development Planning Unit, 10709 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 260, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Mail Code: 604 Phone: (612) 541-7080 Fax: (612) 541-7090 TDD/TTY: (612) 541-7981 -8170- APPLICATION PROCESS All applications must meet HUD eligibility criteria and must be consistent with the endorsed Hennepin County housing and community development priorities. The selection committee has established review criteria by which all applications will be ranked. A copy of these criteria is attached. Communities are encouraged to review these criteria carefully in preparing their applications. The following procedures have been established by the selection committee to simplify the application process: Single-family residential rehabilitation has a set-aside of $155,000. This figure approximates the annual average amount programmed for rehabilitation by the Consolidated Pool, until last year. In 2000, because of the large number of applications, the rehabilitation set-aside was reduced to $100,000. Note that new lead-based paint regulations are expected to significantly increase the cost of rehabilitation. The rehabilitation set-aside will be available to assist households in any .of the Consolidated Pool communities on a fn'st-come, first-serve basis. Only households living in the Consolidated Pool area will be eligible for these set-aside rehabilitation funds. If a city wishes to target rehabilitation funding as part of a neighborhood revitalization effort, they may apply for separate funding. Public services and public service organizations will be applying directly to the Consolidated Pool selection committee for CDBG funding. A public service set-aside of $67,900 has been established. A separate application for these funds is being mailed to organizations that have previously expressed interest in this funding. The balance of funds--$229,881--will be available for CDBG projects initiated by individual cities or clusters of cities. Only those communities that comprise the Consolidated Pool are eligible to compete for these funds. The minimum project cost is $7,500. Individual communities may submit up to three project applications, but the accompanying resolution must indicate council-assigned priority. Communities are strongly encouraged to develop joint initiatives to address mutual needs by consolidating their resources into cluster projects. This is particularly tree where several communities may join together on affordable housing initiatives. CONSOLIDATED PLAN This is the seventh year the CDBG Annual Action Plan is being developed under the Consolidated Plan process. HUD instituted this process as a replacement for the independent planning and submission for the CDBG, HOME, Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) Programs and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). The Plan is intended to focus HUD resources and other federal, state and local resources on high priority needs. COUNTYWIDE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES The 2000-2004 housing and community development priorities are similar to the 1995-1999 priorities. Changes include fair housing and tenant/landlord counseling changing to high priority from medium priority, and micro-business changing to a low priority from a medium priority. A summary of priorities and goals by strategy is shown in the attached tables. A new strategy has been developed for neighborhood revitalization activities that address slum or blight -8171 - issues on scattered sites and in defined areas. CDBG-assisted activities associated with neighborhood revitalization projects (removal of slum/blight properties) will only be considered a high priority when a minimum of 20 percent of any housing created or rehabbed through redevelopment will be affordable to low and moderate income households. This would apply to scattered-site as well as area slum/blight activities. The reason for this change is to better focus CDBG funding on activities consistent w/th priorities and to reduce the amount of CDBG used for non-low and moderate income benefit activities. See section below on Low and Moderate Income Benefit. Countywide priorities should be used as a guide when you consider the use of CDBG funds to address local needs. The county will consider the relationship of proposed projects to countywide priorities in the evaluation of proposals. If you propose to use CDBG funds for a project that does not have a high countywide priority, you must clearly demonstrate why the project has a higher priority in your community. AFFORDABLE HOUSING There is a significant need in suburban Hennepin County for affordable housing for low-income households and the CDBG Program is an important resource to assist communities in addressing this critical need for affordable housing. Affordable housing, appropriate to the needs of different types of households, has been identified as a high priority for the use of HUD resources in the Consolidated Plan. Activities are encouraged that will develop or improve housing for low-income households, assist persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless, persons with disabilities, families with children and the elderly. High priority activities for CDBG funding Affordable Housing: Rental housing for elderly and physically disabled persons with income below 30 percent of median income. Rental housing for families with income below 50percent of median income. Permanent supportive housing for persons with mental illness. Rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing with income below 50percent of median income ,/ Homeownership assistance to households with income below 50percent of median income Eligible activities include: acquisition of property, development related infrastructure, development soft- costs, downpayment assistance for first-time homebuyers, and rehabilitation of existing units. Public Services/Facilities and Neighborhood Revitalization: Public services and~or facilities to assist families and seniors to maintain and/or increase self- sufficiency and independent living (including transportation), and to assist youth and their families with counseling and crisis intervention services and recreational activities. · " Neighborhood revitalization activities that address issues ofsubstandard/blightedproperty in scattered site and defined area redevelopment and provide affordable housing on 20percent of the units. -8172- General planning activities and the removal of architectural barriers will be considered a low CDBG funding prioritw, unless the activity is directly related to an otherwise eligible housing and/or community development activity. The purpose of this change, which began with the 1997 program, is to focus funding on activities consistent with CDBG priorities. LOW/MODERATE-INCOME BENEFIT The authorizing statutes for the CDBG program requires that each funded activity meet one of the three national objectives: benefiting low and moderate-income persons; preventing or eliminating slums and or blight; and meeting urgent needs. The statute also states that each grantee must ensure that at least 70 percent of the expenditures during the program year must be used for activities benefiting very low and low-income persons. For the Consolidated Pool this translates into the requirement that 70 percent of all Pool funds will have to benefit low-income persons. HUD allows Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds to be used for eligible area benefit activities in census tracts where the percent of low and moderate-income persons are 37 percent or more. This is an exception to the requirement that a majority of persons in an area must be low and moderate-income. Maps have been provided to communities with qualifying census tract block groups. Please contact your CDBG representative if you need a map or have a question about eligible low and moderate-income benefit activities. AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHER FAIR HOUSING As recipients of HUD funds, Hennepin County and each subrecipient community have agreed to affirmatively further fair housing. Hennepin County encourages all communities to be pro-active in addressing conditions that create impediments to fair housing choice. As a potential condition to receiving future funds, HUD will evaluate our efforts to further fair housing choice. To continue countywide efforts to address barriers, Hennepin County plans on allocating $30,000 from its administrative budget for fair housing services. Services will include fair housing choice outreach, counseling and referral services, training and education programs and enforcement of fair housing laws and ordinances. TIMELINESS HUD requires that CDBG funding be expended in a timely manner. This past program year has shown a slower than expected rate of expenditure of CDBG funds along with a higher than expected rate of program income. To assure continuing compliance w/th timeliness requirements, selection committee members carefully consider project schedules and, especially, completion dates in the review of all applications. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS COUNCIL ACTION Prior to March 9, 2001, each community wishing to apply for Consolidated Pool funding must pass a council resolution on the proposed use of CDBG funds. A sample resolution is enclosed. The resolution includes language authorizing the signature of 2001 subrecipient and third party agreements. A public hearing is not required if a community is submitting an application for CDBG Consolidated Pool funding. PR OJECT PR OPOSALS A completed Consolidated Pool application must be submitted for each project. If multiple proposals are submitted, the accompanying resolution must indicate the city council-assigned priority. The application -8173- and corresponding council resolution must be submitted to this office by March 9, 2001. Hennepin County staff will review each application for completeness and to determine CDBG eligibility, program benefit and the relationship to countywide priorities. If information is missing, or if there are other difficulties, staff will contact you and assist with revisions. o Completed applications will be reviewed by the selection committee against the county's priority needs and Consolidated Pool application review criteria. Upon ranking the applications, the committee will prepare and submit a funding recommendation to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. HOME AND EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT (ESG) PROGRAMS Using a separate solicitation process, the county is currently requesting proposals for $1.925 million of HOME funds and $123,000 of ESG funds. All cities will receive separate notification for the HOME Program. If your city, for-profit or non-profit housing developer is interested in HOME program funding please contact Tonja West-Hafner at 952/541-7089. If your city, a nonprofit emergency shelter and/or service provider or transitional housing provider is interested in ESG funds, please contact Mark Hendrickson at 952/541-7084. ESG funding is currently targeted to funding emergency shelter services and transitional housing for homeless families under the Family Homeless Prevention and Assistance Program. ASSISTANCE If you have any questions about this process or need assistance, please feel free to contact Jim Ford at 952/541- 7091. Enclosures -8174- OE o~ o ~o ~ o N ¢~'4~L~; 0 ~ · o o = · = · o m o o ~ O ~ ~ o E ~ m ~ c c -- 0 0 -8175- Urban Hennepin County 2001 Consolidated Pool Communities OsseO Medicine Lake -8176- Priority Summary A new Five-Year Consolidated Plan (2000-2004) was completed in the spring of 2000. The Five-Year Plan is the result of the collaboration of interested individuals, government agencies, for-profit and nonprofit agencies. The Five-Year Plan identifies current housing and market conditions that relate to housing and community development needs within suburban Hennepin County. After careful evaluation of the housing and market inventory, community input, and a meaningftd citizen participation process, strategies have been formulated to address the community priority needs. Housing and Community Development Five-year Goals and Priorities Below is a sunumry of the highest priorities, as identified in 2000 for the Five-Year Plan. The goals and priorities were identified using the results of the community survey and questionnaire and community meetings, as well as an assessment of funding resources anticipated to be made available to Hennepin County, its Consortium partners - Bloomington and Plymouth, and others. HUD resources will be used to: Preserve the existing affordable housing supply. Provide new affordable rental housing to households with income below 50 percent of median income. · Provide supportive housing for persons with spedal needs. · Improve housing owned or rented by households with income below 50 percent of median income. Provide increased opportunities for homeownership to households with income below 50 percent of median income. Target Emergency Sheker Grant funds to prevention activities and housing- rdated support services for families and youth. Target public service funding to activities that reduce barriers for self-sufficiency by families, foster and maintain self-sufficiency by the elderly, and meet the needs of youth. Use neighborhood revitalization to eliminate blighting influences and create new opportunities for affordable housing and mixed-use development. -8177- · Affmmtively further fair housing through education, outreach and enforcement. Housing Priority Five Year Goal RENTERS ca Small Family/Unrelated Individual High <50%MFI 800 units tn Large Family High <50%MFI 50 units ca Elderly High <30%MFI 150 units ca Physically Disabled High < 30%MFI 50 units OWNERS ca Existing Homeowners · Housing Rehabilitation High <50%MFI 1,200 units · Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention " 1,000 households ca First Time Homebuyers · Homeownership Assistance High <80%MFI 1,300 households · Physically Disabled " 5 households · Homeownership Training " 1,250 households HOMELESS PERSONS ca Prevention & Housing Services Use Continuum of 500 persons (ESGP funds only) Care ca Housing units/beds (Includes Use Continuum of 100 units/beds shelter/transitional housing for Care survivors of domestic abuse) PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS (Non-Homeless) ca Frail Elderly Medium 50 units/beds ca Chemically Dependent Low 50 units/beds ca Mentally Ill High 150 units/beds [] Developmentally Disabled Medium 50 units/beds ca Physically Disabled Medium 50 units/beds ca Persons with AIDS Medium 50 units/beds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PUBLIC SERVICES ca Senior Services/Facilities High NA [] Family Services/Facilities High NA ca Youth Services High NA ca Neighborhood Revitalization* High NA [] Transportation Services High NA 'Neighborhood revitalization, for removal of bl; hied housing, is a high priority only when a rain;mum of 20 percent of new or rehabilitated housing is affordable to low and moderate-income households. -8178- Action Plan Strategies HUD changed its guidelines for identi~fing objectives in Consolidated Hans and Action Plans starting in 2000. In response, activities are further identified by the number of the five- year strategy it will address. Every activity seeking CDBG, HOME and ESGP funds is identified by one of the strategies defined below. Strategies Identified for Housing 1.0 Rental Households 1.1 Small Families, Unrelated Individuals and Large Families .2 Elderly .3 Physically Disabled Renters 2.0 Existing Homeowners 2.1 Physically Disabled Homeowners and/or Family Members 3.0 First-Time Homebuyers 4.0 5.0 Homelessness Housing for Persons with Special Needs 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 Frail Elderly Persons with Alcohol/Other Drug Abuse Problems Persons with Mental Illness Persons with Developmental Disabilities Persons with Physical Disabilities Persons with HIV/AIDS Other Persons with Special Needs Strategies Identified for Community Development and Public Services 6.0 Family Services/Facilities 7.0 Senior Services/Facilities 8.0 Youth Services/Facilities 9.0 Neighborhood Revitalization 10.0 Transportation Services 11.0 Fair Housing -8179- HUD Table 2A 2000-2004 Priority Housing Needs Summary priority Need Level ~ ES~TED ES~TED High, Medium, Low, UNITS DOLLARS TO PRIORITY HOUSING NEEDS ' No SuCh Need NEEDED: ADDRESS (households) ased o~ 1o~ NEED o Census Data) 0-30'/o I 31-$0% I $z-80°×o = Unknown Small Cost-Burden>30% H H L 1,852 Family Unknown & Cost-Burden>50% H H M 2,939 Unrelated Physical Defects H H M 10,217 Unknown Individual Overcrowded M L L N/A Unknown Cost-Burden>30% H H L 168 Unknown Renter Cost-Burden>50% H H M 289 Unknown Large Unknown Family Physical Defects H H M 533 Overcrowded H H M 305 Unknown Unknown Cost-Burden>30% H M L 733 Unknown Cost-Burden>50% H M L 2,118 Unknown Elderly Physical Defects H H M 5,496 Unknown Overcrowded N N N N/A Unknown Cost-Burden>30% M L L N/A Unknown Existing Cost-Burden>50% H M L 3,208 Owner-Occupied Housing Physical Defects H H M 9,163 Unknown Unknown Overcrowded L L L N/A The term "physical defects" indicates a substandard unit. Also, it should be noted that, in most cases, a '%- low" or "N- no need" priority does not mean that the category is unimportant. Rather, it means the need should be addressed with other (non-HUD) anticipated resources. -8180- HUD Table 2B Priority Community Development Needs Summary Priority Need Level ESTI1MATED High, Medium, Low, No DOLLARS TO PRIORITY CO~TY ~ Such Need ~DRESS DEVELOPMENT NEEDS : NEED PUBLIC FACILITY ~EDS Senior Centers H Unknown Youth Centers M N/A Neighborhood Facilities M N/A Child Care Centers L N/A Parks and/or Recreation Facilities M N/A Health Facilities L N/A Parking Facilities L N/A Other Public Facilities L N/A INFRASTRUCTURE IMPRO~MENT Solid Waste Disposal Improvements L N/A Flood Drain Improvements L N/A Water Improvements L N/A Street Improvements L N/A Sidewalk Improvements L N/A Sewer ImProvements L N/A Asbestos Removal L N/A Other Infrastructure Improvement Needs L N/A -8181 - · Priority Need Level ESTIMATED · High, Mediurn, LoW, No DOLLARs TO PRIORITY CO TY Such Need . ADDRESs DEVELOP~ NEEDS ~ NEED }' LtC s avlc . Senior Services H Unknown Handicapped Services H Unkllown Youth Services H Unknown Transportation Services H Unknown Substance Abuse Services L N/A Employment Training L N/A Crime Awareness M N/A Fair Housing Counseling H Unknown Tenant/Landlord Counseling H Unknown Child Care Services H Unknown Health Services L N/A Other Public Service Needs Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention IH [ Unknown ACCESSIB~ITY NEEDS (rem°Val °f eXisting architectural barriers) " Accessibility Needs (In Hennepin County, a high L priority only when part of another high priority low-moderate income benefit activity such as a senior center,_housing rehabilitation, etc.) mSTORIC PRESERVATION NEF, DS · Residential Historic Preservation Needs L N/A Non-Residential Historic Preservation Needs L N/A -8182- Priority Need Level ESTIMATED High, Medium, Love, No DOLLARS TO PRI RITY COMMUNI O TY Such Need ADDRESS DEVELOPMENT NEEDS NEED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Commercial-Industrial Rehabilitation M N/A CommcrciaMndustrial Infrastructure M N/A Other Commercial-Industrial Improvements L N/A Micro-Business L N/A Other Businesses L N/A Technical Assistance L N/A Other Economic Development Needs L N/A (job expansion/retention) OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Energy Efficiency Improvements M N/A Lead Based Paint/Hazards H Unknown Code Enforcement M N/A PLANNING Planning IM I N/A TOTAL ESTIMATED DOLLARS NEEDED TO ADDRESS: $ Unknown The term "physical defects" indicates a substandard unit. Also, it should be noted that, in most cases, a "L- low" or "N- no need" priority does not mean that the category is unimportant. Rather, it means the need should be addressed with other (non-HUD) anticipated resources. -8183- CDBG ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES Federal statutes and regulations determine what activities are eligible under the CDBG Program. Generally, three steps are involved in determining if CDBG funds may be used to assist a proposed activity. 1. Determine if the proposed activity meets one of the following national objectives of the program: Benefiting low and moderate (L/M) income persons (minimum 70% of funding), Prevention or elimination of slums or blight (maximum 30% of funding); or Meeting a particularly urgent community development need. Determine if the activity is included within the listing of eligible activities in the CDBG regulations, as modified by statutory amendments. A general list of eligible activity categories follows: Acquisition of Real Property Disposition of Real Property Public Facilities and Improvements Privately Owned Utilities Clearance of Buildings and Improvements Relocation Public Services Interim Assistance - Urgent Need Removal of Architectural Barriers Housing Rehabilitation Homeownership Assistance Code Enforcement Historic Preservation Commercial or Industrial Rehabilitation Economic Development Activities Special Activities by Subrecipients Planning and Capacity Building Determine if the proposed activity falls within a category of explicitly ineligible activities listed below: Buildings for the General Conduct of Government General Government Expenses Political Activities Purchase of Equipment (generally) Furnishings and Personal Property (generally) Operating and Maintenance Expenses New Housing Construction Income Payments NOTE: The current CDBG Program regulations are contained in 24 CFR Part 570, published September 6, 1988 as amended. Contact your CDBG representative if you would like a copy. -8184- 2000 APPLICATION FORM URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG CONSOLIDATED POOL (Use one form per project) Applications are due by March 9, 2001 at the ttennepin County Office of Planning and Development. Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Jim Ford at 952/541-7091. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s): 2. Project Name: 3. CDBG funding request: $ 4. Total project cost: $ 5. Contact person: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the project. (Limit one page) Describe any unique features of the proposal. Describe project area/location. 2. 3. PROJECT FEASIBILITY 1. Phone: Provide a detailed project budget. Identify major project components, e.g., planning, administration, construction costs, and possible funding source. 2. Explain why CDBG funds are needed to implement this project. 3. Provide a list of all funding sources which have been considered, amounts and the status of each source. 4. For the time period 7-1-01 to 6-30-03, provide an implementation schedule, identifying major project tasks and when they will occur. NOTE: The expected completion date must be identified. 5. Describe applicant's expertise and financial capacity to implement the proposed activity. PROJECT BENEFIT 1. Describe how the project principally benefits low and moderate-income residents. 2. Estimate the number of low/moderate-income households/persons to be served by the project. -8185- 3. Describe how the project aids in the prevention or elimination of blight. 4. Describe how the project expands or preserves the existing tax base. 5. Describe how the project provides expanded opportunities for residents or preserves existing resources. COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH 1. Describe the multi-community or multi-agency nature of the project. 2. Describe how the project meets one of the high priority needs, as identified in the Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. 3. Describe how the project meets locally identified housing and community development needs. 4. Describe how the project is consistent with the city's comprehensive and land use plans and, if appropriate, how the project addresses the city's Livable Communities Act goals. 5. Letters of support may be included with the application. Applications should be submitted to: Jim Ford Hennepin county Office of Planning and Development 10709 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 260 Minnetonka MN 55305-1530 Tel: 952/541-7091 E-mail: jim.ford~co.hennepin.mn Fax: 952/541-7090 TDD/TTY: 952/541-7981 Applications are due by March 9, 2001 at the ltennepin County Office of Planning and Development. O: \dpuprog\cdbg\cdbg2000\conpool\conpoolapp2000.doc -8186- Urban Hennepin County CDBG Consolidated Pool 2001 Application Review Criteria All applications will be reviewed by Hennepin County staff to assure that the projects are eligible for CDBG funding. Proposed projects must be an eligible activity and meet CDBG program benefit requirements. The selection committee will utilize the following criteria as a guide in formulating a funding recommendation to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Point Ranee Score PROJECT FEASIBILITY 0-10 1. The extent to which the applicant has demonstrated a level of financial commitment needed to complete the activity. Funding sources are documented, indicating the level of commitment, conditions and time frame for expending funds. (This may be evaluated based on the experience of the applicant in obtaining these commitments.) 0-10 2. The extent to which the applicant has combined other public and/or private funds to minimize the amount of requested funds. · Percentage of CDBG funding as compared to the entire project cost. The CDBG request is the minimum necessary to implement the project (project costs are reasonable; other funding has been leveraged to the maximum extent feasible). · CDBG funds are being prudently utilized to accomplish the proposed project. 0-10 The extent to which the applicant has demonstrated the capacity to complete the activity within the designated time period. Projects that cannot be completed by June 30, 2002 may be given a lower priority. The project schedule is reasonable. Applicant has the expertise in place, or has identified a plan to acquire the expertise, necessary to implement the activity. NOTE: Projects must score a minimum of 20 points in the above section to receive further consideration. PROJECT BENEFIT 0-15 1. The extent to which the proposed project addresses the needs of low and moderate- income residents. · Number of households to be served. · Project provides direct benefit to low and moderate-income persons. Project reduces reliance on public services and promotes self-reliance. -8187- 0-15 0-10 0-10 0-10 0-10 2. Proposed project aids in the prevention or elimination of blight. · Project stabilizes neighborhoods. Project stabilizes commercial areas. 3. The extent to which the proposed activity provides opportunities not now provided or provided on a limited basis, as compared to the identified need. · Project creates new opportunities or prevents the loss of current resources. · Project preserves or expands the existing tax base. COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH 1. The extent to which the proposed project is consistent with the high priority needs as identified in the Hennepin Consolidated Plan and identified local needs. · Proposed project is a high priority in the Hennepin Consolidated Plan and · Proposed project addresses high priority, locally identified needs. 2. The proposed project is consistent with the local comprehensive and land use plans and, if appropriate, with the Livable Communities Act housing action plan and goals. · Project is consistent with local plans. · Project assists in achieving the local LCA goals. · Project assists in maintaining the local LCA goals. 3. The proposed project is a multi-community initiative. · Several communities are cooperating in this initiative. · Project is a cooperative initiative from partners in the public and private sector. · Project is the result of a joint planning effort. TOTAL PROJECT POINTS /100 O:\\Adpuprog\cdbg\cdbg2000\conpool\conpoolapprev.doc -8188- Z 0 z Z :3: z ~ n Z Z 0 0 mO o~8~ oo<m -8189- 000~00000 ~85oo~ 81 gO-i Z zm~n, ~0 Oma- -8191 - -8192- Date: To: From: Subject: March 22, 2001 Kandis Hanson - Mound City Manager Greg Pederson - Mound Fire Chief Meeting Minutes and Summary - March 14, 2001 Meeting Just wanted to provide you all with a summary of the MFD Meeting that was held on Wednesday, March 14, 2001. A packet of information is included for those of you that were unable to attend. Meetinq Minutes Topic Action or Activity I. Tour of fire station, apparatus and equipment All went well - No one got lost II. MFD - Overview of organization Good questions - No follow up required III. MFD - By the numbers Good questions - No follow up required IV. Mound Fire Commission Proposal Positive feedback to proposal. MFD will proceed to form this Commission. Need to identify Representatives from each Community. V. Fire Prevention and Inspection Plan Group supports this plan. MFD will proceed with implementation 3/19/01. Need priorities from each city (see attachment) VI. MFD Fire / Rescue Call Committee (committee to Reduce rescue calls) Much positive feedback on this effort also. All cities seemed to support. VII. MFD Business and Financial Plan · Reviewed business plan and Issues Good questions - No follow up required. · Reviewed financial plan (5) Year Generally - Operating budget will not increase significantly. -8193- Fee schedule for services · MFD budget issues- major Purchases - 800 MHZ Radio Project (2002) - Fire Engine Pumper (2002) - Fire Station (new or remodeled 2004) - Fire Rescue Truck (2004) - Fire Truck Aerial (2005) · Challenges for fire service and MFD VIII. Community Service Possible fire commission group discussion. Proposed purchases $ 60,000 - $ 70,000 $ 260,000 $1,400,000 (est.) $ 85,OO0 $ 48O,OOO No follow up required. Everyone should attend MFD's 50th Annual Fish Fry on Saturday, June 2, 2001. Featuring the White Sidewalls. Key Issues - Overview · MFD Fire Commission Formation · Implementation of Fire Inspection Plan · Budget Outlook-Operating Budget · Budget Outlook - Major Purchases Action Plan MFD will proceed MFD will proceed No significant increase due to reduced rescue calls (refer To forecast) MFD Committees will proceed and investigate fire station options as well as fire apparatus purchases. Attachments -8194- Please review these minutes with the appropriate city officials that were unable to attend. Special thanks to those of you that made time to attend this meeting! Please call if you have any questions. Thanks, Greg Pederson -8195- 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 Date: To: From: Subject: April 30, 2001 Kandis Hanson Greg Pederson Fire Commission Meeting "Kick Off" Please mark your calendar for the 1st Mound Fire Commission Meeting. This meeting will be held on: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. Mound Fire Station (Lunch will be provided) The meeting agenda will be as follows: Agenda · Discuss Fire Commission Charter · Fire Service Fees (i.e. Inspections, False Alarms, Etc.) · Fire Department Update- YTD · Fire Station Facility Plans · New Fire Apparatus Committee Report · FEMA Fire Grants Information Please make this meeting a priority! If you have a conflict and cannot attend, please call Kathy at MFD 952-472-3555. See you at the meeting! Regards, Greg c.c. Mayor Pat Meisel -8196- MOUND FIRE COMMISSION May 2Z, 7001 11:15 a.m. Meeting Began Introductions Goals · Create Better Financial Awareness - Concerns - Increase coming advance (budget) Achieve Consistency in Policies - Fees - False Alarms - Rec Fires Policy Fire Prevention - Building Codes - Sprinklers - Youth (playing with matches) Fire Services · Burning Permit - Handout (Mound) what you can and can't do - Distance from building Building Permit Building Code - fee - Inquiries - Shorewood · No additional fee · Fire Service · Building Code · Fee schedule · 97 · These are the services you get when you pay the fee · Fire Alarm False Alarm Suggestions · Bump up to $ 500 · Be reasonable · Uniformity · Fire Marshal May suggest what to keep alarms from not going off (ex. Dust) -8197- Build up to provide service Consistency Need to cover cost Shorewood 1st free (warning letter) 2nd mandatory $ 200 renewal permit Alarm system within 12 month time period Special assessment Facility Committee · Consider all options in regards to station Keep and add (structurally sound) Build new · Develop needs list · Professional review of station · Shared facility (police & fire) · Efficient (ex. Apparatus) and quality response time · Look at issues with satellite · Emergency type building (tornado, flood, etc.) · Utilize space Goal: is to serve everyone not just Mound Comments: Shared (ex. Training), Fire Skills Training 12:25 Lunch Break 12:50 2nd Half Apparatus · Residential · Business · Trends, Costs, Workmanship · Custom Built Truck · $ 230,000 to $ 260,000 · Specification Worksheet - detail (lighting, generator, etc.) Goal · · · · Work with 2 different manufactures Changes that need to be made By end of Nov. complete specs By end of year present to city -8198- · By end of 2002 a new pumper (front line) · Strive for 20-25 years of use Contracts · Date Changes · Financial (budget) · Fire Prevention & Inspection-Addition Future Meeting · Tuesday midday-ok · Budget Reasons-July 1:30 p.m. End -8199- -8200- -8201 - -8202- -8203- z .1~ O0 CD CZ) 0 0 0 CD CD 0 O0 CD 0 CD 0 0 0 0 z z 0 o r~ o o .~ o o ~ .~ o ~ ao o o o o o o . o o .~. o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 ~ 0 .,~ C~O 0 (~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O~ 0 0 CD 0 0 CD 0 CD I~O CD 0 0 CD 0 -82O4- o o u~ o ~o 0~ o0 o o o 00 o~ 00 ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o -4 0 0 0 0 hO 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD z 0 z -8205- -8206- -.~~ =~ ~_.~-. ~ o~o~ooooooooooooooo~ ~ o o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o o ~ o o ~ o ~ ~ o ~ o o ~ -8207- o o o o o o o o o ~ o o o o~,~ -8208- M e d i a c o _0_ North Central Region Cornrnuni~y Leader tVewsle~er June 2001 Serving over 320 Communities in Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, and South Dakota Mediacom to Acquire Cable Systems'in Four States From AT&T Broadband To Be Largest Cable Operator in Iowa Mediacom Communications Corpo- ration and AT&T Broadband have entered into definitive asset purchase agreements under which AT&T Broadband will sell to Mediacom cable television systems serv- ing about 840,000 basic subscribers in Georgia, Illinois, Iowa and Missouri, for $2.215 billion in cash, the companies an- nounced on February 27, 2001. These transactions include sys- tems serving Albany, Columbus, Tifton and Valdosta, Ga.; Charleston, Carbondale, Effingham, Marion, Moline Rock Island, Ill.; Ames, Cedar Rapids, Davenport, Des Moines, Dubuque, Fort Dodge, Iowa City, Mason City and Wa- terloo, Iowa; and Columbia, Jefferson City and Springfield, Mo. "We are embarking on another new and exciting chapter in the growth story of Mediacom," said Rocco Commisso, chairman and chief executive officer. "This transaction with AT&T Broadband represents a unique opportu- nity to purchase highly attractive systems, including several serving the top 100 mar- kets. And, for the second time in two years, we'll be doubling the size of the company. Our excellent management team has proven itself time and time again as a suc- cessful acquirer and integrator of cable systems, having successfully completed 20 acquisitions in the last five years to build the quality company that Mediacom is to- day. Overall, we are excited by the oppor- tunities this transaction presents, not only for our new customers, but also for our investors, our employees, and the dedi- ;d AT&T field staff that we will warmly into the Mediacom family," Commisso said. (see Mediacom/ATT page 2) 2000-2001:$73 Million to 'Deliver The Promise'! Since acquiring the regional systems late in 1999, Mediacom has invested $73 million in capital expenditures alone to deliver on the promise of upgrading and rebuilding systems, adding programming, and launching new services. Physical Plant. In 2000, Mediacom upgraded over 2030 miles of plant providing customers with improved pic- ture quality and service reliability. Projects in 2001 have also jumped off to a great start with almost $33 million in capital slated to upgrade/rebuild/interconnect over 1600 miles of plant in Mediacom communities. Programming. Mediacom has increased program- ming in almost every community since 1999. And with the deployment of our fiber-optic broadband system, we have launched Digital Cable in many markets and project to add even more communities in 2001. Digital Cable offers customers over 100 programming choices, including music and pay per view options, making this product very appeal- ing to our customers. New Services. Mediacom continues to use our up- graded physical plant to launch new services, including high speed Internet access. Cable modems have rolled out in many markets and will continue to be a significant part of Mediacom's plan to offer our customers a wide range of broadband services. Mediacom Chairman & CEO Rocco Commisso presents the top technical Company Customer Service Award to Mediacom's Brice Baumgarten, Minnesota. -8209 Mediacom's North Central Region: A Look at Our Network of Communities The North Central Region is composed of over 320 communities located in Minnesota, Wiscon- sin, Iowa, and South Dakota, covering a geo- graphical area of over 1640 square miles. The acquisition of properties from Triax, Zylstra, Lakes Cable, Tri-State, and Satellite Cable com- panies enabled these systems to become part of the Mediacom family over the part two years. The year 2000 brought about the most sig- nificant changes to these systems that most of the communities have ever seen. Programming additions increased by more than 100% in many communities, as we have begun the Mediacom plan of interconnecting our communities and providing digital and high speed Internet ser- vices. Systems, some with less than 100 cus- tomers, are now served with a broadband design platform that many large communites do not yet fully enjoy. In 2001, our fiber optic interconnect plan is off to a great start. The traditional use of a headend, or receive site, in each community can be an inefficient use of technology and resources. By collapsing headends and tying communities together with fiber optic cable, our plan to de- ploy new services and products and increase sys- tem reliabflty can be attained much faster than ever before. Our collapse of headends has be- gun in earnest and with the addition of our new "master headends", we are assuring our Mediacom communities will receive the best pos- sible products now and into the futureI Mediacom/ATT continued from Page 1. Commisso added, "AT&T Broadband has done a tremendous job launching digital cable and high-speed Internet services. This, in part, reflects the fact that about half of the subscribers are served by systems that have been upgraded to 550MHz to 860MHz bandwidth capac- ity. In keeping with Mediacom's operating strategy and our commitment to first-class customer service, we in- tend to aggressively upgrade the remaining AT&T Broad- band cable systems and deliver to all of our new custom- ers in these communities a state-of-the-art' offering of advanced broadband services." Medlacom [Nasdaq:MCCC - news) is the 8th largest cable television company in the United States. after giving effect to the acquisition of the AT&q' Broadband cable systems. On a pro forma basis, the company's cable systems pass approximately 2.6 million homes and serve approximately 1.6 million basic subscribers in 23 states. The company offers an array of broadband services, including cable television, advanced digital video programming and high-speed lntemet access. City Council Member Jim White, Orono, Minnesota, tries out Mediacom's High Speed Internet service at a recent cable modem demonstration. NEW SERVICES UPDATE! Hi_oh Speed Internet: OffTo the Races: Mediacom's Excite@Home Services Launch Customers to the Internet Mediacom has now partnered with one of the nation's largest Internet providers to deliver our high speed Internet services to residential and business customers. Excite@Home gives Mediacom custom- ers "always on" Internet access at very high speeds. And the best news of all: it all comes through your Mediacom cable modem. No second telephone phone line needed! Digital Television: Watch for these services in your community! Mediacom has also successfully intro- duced many customers to our new Digital Services - over 100 programming choices, pay per view movies and events are available in some communities. The Digital Cable prod- uct gives customers on screen programmin menus, parental control, clear digital pictures and music programming for every taste! -8210- Meet Your Mediacom North Central District Management Team! Bill Jensen 2381 Wilshire Blvd Mound, Minnesota 55364 952-472-6764 Serving Communites in Twin Cities and Central Minnesota, and Northern Minnesota Doug Bierschbach P.O. Box 106 1027 Main Avenue South Brookings, South Dakota 57006 605-692-5508 Serving Communities in South Dakota, Western Minnesota, and Northwest Iowa Jim Robinson 1827 Trout Run Road Decorah, Iowa 52101 319-387-0825 Serving Communities in Southeastern Minnesota, Central and Eastern Iowa, and Western Wisconsin A Message From: Charles King, Vice-President North Central Region I am very happy to have joined the Mediacom family in January! I look forward to getting to know the many leaders in the communities we serve. I hope you will feel free to comment on our operations and contact me with your questions and concerns. We value the opportunity to be a part of your community, and I appreciate the opportunity to be able to address any issues you may have. The North Central Region has also made a significant investment in operations and management to assure quality performance in the field. The billing conversion conducted last duly has enabled our Customer Service Representatives to improve the efficiency and quality of customer care. In addition, the Region has made additions to senior management and has divided the Region into three management areas. The District General Managers are an important asset as we work to carry out our mission of providing new broadband services and increasing our customer base. Daily contact with our employees in the field provides us with opportunities to capture new business, increased training and performance opportunities, and the ability to address local issues on a timely basis. Mediacom's North Central Division is also proud that the accomplishments of two of our employees gained recognition for exceptional contributions to Mediacom in 2000. Receiving the highest honors in his area, Brice Baumgarten was named Top Company Tech by our Chairman Rocco Commisso. Jonathan Rodd, our Regional Sales/ Audit Manager, was also noted for his Outstanding Achievement by our Senior Vice President of Operations, Jim Carey. examples of dedication and performance inspire us all, and will keep Mediacom moving forward Our battle cry this year is: "Putting the l~llg in l~llgdiacom." We are working to make sure every employee under- the importance of their performance to our customers and the communities we serve, and to empower each employee to be able to solve our customer's concerns quickly and efficiently. Mediacom has provided the tools and re- sources, and a plan for success. It will be up to all of us to execute the plan, beginning with providing our customers with the highest level of service in the industry. -8211 Mediaco A Commitment to the Communities We Serve.... Mediacom values the importance of our business to your community. Through franchise fees, com- munity public access support, Cable In the Classroom and many other community activities, Mediacom strives to be an contributing and active member of your community. Our employees also participate in many qommunity events and projects throughout the Region. Mediacom personnel have taken part in everything: sandbagging for flood control, marching in parades, and even participating in the "Turkey Bowl" in St. James, Minnesota! Providing service and resPonding to community needs are important to the success of our business. Mediacom hosted an outing to the Minnesota TwinS game to help the citizens of Granite Falls, Minnesota, celebrate the recovery of their City after a severe tornado struck the City. And many residents, including Grace Opdahl and Erin Taylor enjoyed the memorable occasionl Your Mediacom North Central Re_~ion Government and Community Relations Team Tom Bordwell, Director of Government Relations 14162 Commerce Ave. Suite 100 Prior Lake, MN 55272 1-888-591-8062x222 Theresa Sunde, Community Relations Coordinator P.O. Box 110 1504 Second Street SE Waseca, MN 56093 1-507-835-2356 John Varvel, Government Relations Manager P.O. Box 178 800 Douglas Ave Yankton, South Dakota 57078 605-665-8030 Do you have an idea on how Mediacom can improve our services, or a question we may answer about our operation or products? We welcome your suggestions and response! Please call or mail any member of our team! -8212- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com To~ From: Re: Date: Kandis M. Hanson Oino Businaro 2001 Water Patrol Participation June 28, 2001 At the June 26, 2001 meeting the City Council approved payment of $2,297.68 to the LMCD for the 2001 Water Patrol Participation. We have processed the payment to meet the July 1, 2001 due date. I have called Gregory Nybeck, LMCD Executive Director, to get a clarification on the amount assessed to the city. He confirmed that the amount provided should be paid in full for now. Later he will recalculate the city share based on the appropriate cost and will refund any overpayments as applicable. Let me know if you need additional information on this matter. 8213-yc'e'~p''p''r - 8214- TO: C~no Kandis Hanson FROM: Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator SUBJECT: Recycling Day, May 19, 2001 We were very busy on this day. We had 5 - 80 cubic yard dumpster of furniture ( and misc. items) hauled away that day, with another one being hauled away on Monday. We collected a total of 264 appliances, 463 tires, a 50 cubic yard dumpster of TV's, Stereos, VCRs and other electronic items. We collected 9,078 lbs Of goodwill items. There was a lot of scrap metal, we don't have the figures yet. We collected $9,354.67. Our expenses are so far $8,167.91 (still waiting for bill from Blackowiak for hauling of electronics approximately $400.00). For these clean-up's we have 4 people collecting money at the gate, and 7 people~-~9- ~ ~fto O, working the different drop-off bins, all these people are on overtime. We are planning on having another clean-up day on September 29, 2001, at Minnetrista again. We haven't heard if they will be participating in this clean-up. -8215- COmpSou e June 2001 NURTURING GOOD GOVERNANCE Is Yours G-G-G. -Great or G-G-G-Grim ? Organizations need governance' to survive, grow, mature and prosper. Effective boards, councilS and commissions ensure that their members who are elected, appointed or secured by other means clearly understand, willingly accept and enthusiastically assume the obligations of collective, collaborative governance. The alternative is to regularly suffer through random acts of individual independence and initiative that cross the line 13etween governance and tinkering, disrupting operations and irritating the executive team. Recruitment and Selection SUccessful staffing outcomes depend on the depth, breadth and quality of recruitment and selection. Here are some characteristics that would differentiate top candidates for a governance role: Ethics and Integrity · Principles and values that are visibly and consistently demonstrated in establishing and performing the entire scope of one"s individual and collective governance obligations. Passion for the Purpose · Intense, visible and active convictions supporting and promoting the organization's purpose. Vision · Foresight that' discerns and balances strengths and' opportunities with potential resources to advance the organization's 'purpose. Determination · Ongoing and consistent insistence that the organization advance, measure and regularly evaluate achievements consistent With its overall purpose. Decisiveness · Clear, unmistakable resolutions and communications on governance obligations., issues and policies. Discipline · Visible and consistent adherence to one's individual and collective governance role. Connections · A friendly and accessible network of individuals, groups and other interested parties in a position to support and advance the organization's purpose. The GOvernance Role Boards, councils and commissions should clarify their respective governance roles early in the process of recruiting and selecting new members. Here is a' example summary of effective governance and its expected outcome followed by a few specific essential accountability examples that should be assumed by members of a governing authority: Role Summary To exercise prudent judgments in reviewing, evaluating and approving strategic directions or policies developed in partnership with the organization's chief executive. · To accept authority and responsibility for collective governance of the organiZation. To actively support one another and the entire governance authority in fulfilling the organization's purpose. Expected Outcome of Effective Governance · The organization realizes and sustains success, consistently achieving quantifiable and qualitative goals linked to the organization's business plans and purpose. Past issues of CompSource can be found on our web site: www. rdkcompsource, corn -8216- ZONING ACTIVITY SHEET JUNE 2001 June 6, 2001: 1. 4882 Edgewater - Zoning Warning a. trash b. miscellaneous items c. piles of hay d. wood/branches la. June 23, 2001 -Zoning follow up - trash and wood issues resolved - second warning issued for hay and misc. exterior items 2. 2048 Arbor Lane - Zoning Warning a. debds by garage 2a. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up - issue resolved June 8, 2001: 1. 5226 Sulgrove - Zoning Warning a. MN5283EG & trailer not currently registered b. Grass exceeds proper length la. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up all issues resolved 2. 5232 Sulgrove - Zoning Warning a. house numbers must be visible/present 2a. June 26, 2001 - resolved 3. 4748 Aberdeen (across street from that address) - Zoning Warning a. house numbers must be present/visible b. grass exceeds proper length 3a. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up - resident claimed that she did not receive warning - second warning issued for same issues June 9, 2001: 1. 5971 Hillcrest- Zoning Warning a. RV must be currently licensed b. Trailer must be currently licensed c. Misc. exterior storage la. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up RV and trailer currently licensed - 2nd warning issued for wood pile 2. 6090 Aspen Rd m- Zoning Warning a. number of vehicles stored exceeds allowed b. MN BHN232, 463GQG & 048DHB must be currently licensed c. Bags of leaves -8218- d. All trailers 2a. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up - all vehicles currently licensed, warning extended until 7/2/01 per secretary 3. 4849 Wilshire - Zoning Warning a. MN 653LHD must be currently licensed 3a. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up - issue resolved 4. 4843 Wilshire - Zoning Warning a. bags of leaves b. debris in truck bed c. wood pile 4a. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up - bags of leaves and wood pile taken care of 2na warning issued for debris in truck bed 5. 4746 Richmond - Zoning Warning a. Trailer must be currently licensed b. Miscellaneous exterior storage items 5a. 4746 Richmond - Zoning follow up a. all issues resolved June 12, 2001: 1. 5033 Bartlett- Zoning Warning a. MN EWS860 must be currently licensed and operable la. June 23, 2001 - Zoning follow up - issue resolved June 14,2001: 1. 4907 Wilshire - Zoning Warning a. MN 169MCP must be currently licensed and operable 2. 5504 Belmont Lane - Zoning Warning a. Vehicle must be operable and currently licensed b. Tires and miscellaneous debris must be disposed of 3. 2871 Marlboro - Zoning Warning a. Grass must be cut b. Vehicle must be currently licensed and operable 3a. June 26, 2001 spoke with Joan Conkey, resident grass issue is resolved written warning mailed to son (owner of vehicle) in St. Louis Park given until July 9, 2001 4. Devon/Manchester (No house numbers) - Zoning Warning a. House numbers must be present and visible b. Tires, wood debris, etc must be properly disposed of c. MN EXD659 must be operable 5. 3149 Inverness - Zoning Warning a. semi-trailer parking violation - 8219- b. branches/wood pile must be stacked c. MN 242PAV must be currently licensed and operable 5a. June 26, 2001 reinspection of property citation issued for semi-trailer branches/wood pile stacked (resolved) spoke with Mr. Miller and referred him to Ridgedale Court re: court date 6. 3068 Brighton - Zoning Warning a. MN FTL034, DBW825, 970KDD, and 009MRM must all be currently licensed and operable 7. 4552 Denbigh - Referred to Jon Sutherland re: Safety/Inspection of garage on property June 23, 2001 1. 5226 Sulgrove a. warning issued 6/8/01 - resolved 2, 2009 Arbor Lane a. warning issued 5/26/01 - resolved 3. 2015 Arbor Lane a. warning issued 5/26/01 - resolved 4. 2017 Arbor Lane a. warning issued 5/26/01 - resolved 5. 4751 Aberdeen - Zoning Warning a. house numbers b. grass must be cut 6. 3043 Tuxedo - Zoning Warning a. grass must be cut b. misc. items by side of house c. referred to Jon S. (re: condition of residence) 7. 4845 Edgewater - Zoning Warning a. MN 590KEE must be currently licensed and operable b. Misc. items must be disposed of properly c. Referred to Jon Sutherland (bldg. condition) 8. 2980 Highland - Zoning follow up a. warning issued 5/26/01 - resolved 9. 6112 Bartlett Blvd - Zoning Warning a. misc. exterior storage violations · 10. 6075 Rustic-wood - Zoning Warning a. MN DNW437 must be currently licensed/operable b. Misc. items in violation of exterior storage ordinances c. Wood debris must be disposed of properly 11. 4949 Bartlett Blvd - Zoning Warning a. MN 6419DE must be currently licensed b. Misc. trailers must also be licensed c. Misc. items in violation of exterior storage ordinances 12. 4740 Richmond - Zoning Warning a. MN LCT892 must be currently licensed/operable b. Number of vehicles exceeds maximum # allowed -8220- Page 1 of 1 RitterBonnie 1 From: "RitterBonnie" <RitterBonnie~msn.com> To: "Kandis Hanson" Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:16 PM Subject: Refund of Moving Permit Fee Background: On June 29, the Hockey Association applied and received a building moving permit to move the warming house from Haddorf Field to Grandview. They paid the $100 fee, along with proving insurance and depositing a $1,000 cashiers check (security for damages, etc.) Peter Meyer is requesting that this $100 fee be refunded, due to it coming from a non-profit organization. If this needs Council action, he wants it on the 7/10 agenda ......... - 8221 - 07/05/2001 07-05-01 10:58 From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN +B1233?g310 T-132 P.0Z/02 F-021 E D 470 Pdt~bury C:nt~r 200 South Sixth .Street Mmn~',poh, MN 55402 (612) ~57-93fi0 ~dcphonr (612) 53~-9310 F.~ h=p.//w~ ~nned/-g~a~cn ~om July 5, 2001 Bon.me Kitter Acting City Clerk City of Mo,md 5341 Maywood Road Mound, 1VIN 55364 FAX .,~d~D MAIL Re: Request m consider wmver ofb~lding moving permit fee. Dear Bonnie. You have asked for my opinion regarding whether the council has the auf~oriry to wa/ve all or par~ of the permit fee charged for the moving of buildings. Section 300:25 of the City Code imposes a fee on the moving of buildings in the City. The fee is established by resolution. Because this fee is not surcharged (no part is remitted m another unix of government), and because the fee is not specifically required or set by staxe law, the city has the authority to decide whether to waive it. Although the council may act to waive the fee, the following points should be consxdered in makh~g the decision: 1. The fee is intended to offset the cost of processing the application. If the fee is waived, the processing cosx is borne by the genial fund. 2. The council *ill find it very difficult to not graco oth~ waivers m ~e future for similar situations. If the council does grant the waiver, l~ may also wish of consider mending the City Code to specifically recognize its aur~hority to gran~ waivers. -8222-