Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2002-01-22
PLEASE ~ OFF AT CELL PHO~ & PAGERS I~ COUNCIL CHAMBERS. :'):' ::~ :': ': :: ' :: "'~i! .. ........... . . : ............ ::::: .. .......... .:. ..................... ...........~.......,..._ :....~:...................-.~....~:~.,~.....~....~...~ .~...~.<.:.:~:::~:::::.:~ .......... .... ............. ........ ..... ........... ........... : .................. . ................... :~,.. ~..,?......~ ........ :~... .:.:.~..: .......................... :.,..:~.~. .:~,..:. ..:.:,:~. .,: ....... ~ ..:.~:.:.. .~:::::.: ...... :.<.:.:<.:.:.:.:.:.~ AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 22~ 2002; 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *ConSent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. PAGE 1. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: JAN 8, 2002 REGULAR MEETING *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS *C. APPROVE RESOLUTION ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID'S FOR WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON WESTEDGE BOULEVARD: FEB 20 *D. APPROVE RESOLUTION ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WESTEDGE BOULEVARD: FEB 20 *E. APPROVE RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON ~ROVEMENT OF CSAH 15, FROM CYPRESS LANE TO APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET WEST OF CSAH 110, PLUS RELATED IMPROVEMENT OF CSAH 110, NORTH AND SOUTH OF CSAH 15 AND CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO THE METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MOUND VISIONS 2sD ) 2002" *F. APPROVE RESOLUTION RELATING TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING *G. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT (#A14569) WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY ~GARDING ELECTRIC PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED DATA BASE (EPDB) AND AUTHORIZING TIlE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT *H. APPROVE RESOLUTION AME~G THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF THE CITY OF MOUND 335-341 342-377 378 379 380 381-382 383 384 PLEASE ~ OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. *I. APPROVE EXTENSION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF TLANDS CONSERVATION ACT NO-LOSS REQUEST BY TIMOTHY BECKER, LOTS 5-8, BLOCK 4, ~SON SHORES DEVELOPMENT - XXXX THREE POINTS BOULEVARD - EXTENSION BEING THROUGH JULY 23, 2002. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) 5. SKATE PARK COMMITTEE REPORT 6~ ACTION ON COOPERAT~ AGREEMENT ~ GILLESPIE CENTER DISCuSSION~STAFF D~CTION ON NUISANCE (TRUCK PARKING) CASi~ STAFF RESPONSE ON COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE REQUIREMENT FOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS IN THE CITY OF MOUND 398-401 402-404 405-413 DISCUSSION/ACTION ON LIQUOR LICENSE FEES, WITH OPTION TO SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE 414 10. SET SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOPS A. JAN 30, 6:00 PM FACILITIES S~Y UPDATE, INCLUDING FINANCING OPTIONS AND PHONE SURVEY RESULTS B. FEB 13, 7:00 PM REDEVELOPMENT RECAP, INCLUDING PROJECTS AND THEIRS COSTS, AND WHERE TO WE GO FROM HERE (JOINT MEETING WITH HRA) 11. INFORMATION/IVlI SCELLANEOUS A. AMM Fax News B. Friday Fax C. Correspondence: LMCD D. FYI: Peter Meyer fundraiser clearance E. Memo: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District F. FYI: Excerpts from the Delano Eagle on utility fees G. Contact info for LMCD representative H. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative I. Save the Lake Recognition Banquet registration $. Correspondence: School District K. Metropolitan Council newsletter L. Hennepin County Conservation District newsletter M. Report: Building Activity N. Mediacom notice on rates O. Article: Waconia City Hall success story P. Memo: LMC 12. ADJOURN "his ix a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. ¢itVo~aound. com. 415-423 424-427 428-440 441 442 443-445 446 447-450 451 452-457 458-459 460-467 468 469-470 471 472 More current meeting COUNCIL BRIEFING JANUARY 22, 2002 ~Jpcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Jan 22 - 6:30 PM: HRA Jan 22 - 7:30 PM: Regular CC Jan 30 - 11-1:30 PM: Fire Commission (Bob only) Jan 30 - 6:00 PM: Workshop - Facilities Study (proposed) Jan 31 - 6 PM: Commissioners Recognition at VFW Feb 12 - 6:30 PM: HRA Feb 12 - 7:30 PM: Regular CC Feb 13 - 7:00 PM: Workshop - Downtown Redevelopment (proposed) Mar 2 - Chamber of Commerce Mid-Winter Ball City Hall Closed Jan 21 Martin Luther King Day Feb 18 President's Day City Manager Absence I will be absent Jan 19 -27 and Feb 8. Council meeting in my place. Gino will be Acting Manager in my absence. He will attend the Jan 22 #3.C. & D. Westedge Improvements We went out for bids on these projects last year but the one bid received was too high to move forward. We are rebidding the project. #3.E. Improvements to County 15 and MetroPlains The improvements that are considered 'public improvements' are being assessed to the MetroPlains project under the Subdivision Agreement. That includes such items as the playground equipment, street and turn lanes on 15 and 110, sidewalks and streetscape improvements. #3.F. Tax Increment Resolution Jim Prosser of Ehlers let us know that the changing TIF laws require us to pass this resolution. #3.G. EPDB This is an annual event to pass this resolution, in order to maintain our agreement with the County to gain access to certain property-related information. #3.H. Administrative Code We need to amend the code to reflect the increase in the City's contribution to employee health insurance premiums. Secondly, there has been an oversite along the way and no mention has ever been made about the long-term disability insurance that the City has historically provided. This is not a change in policy but a housekeeping measure. #3.I. Becker Extension The Becket case is an ongoing land use issue. The law requires formal written agreements of extension until the resolved. #9. 2002 Fees See Bonnle's memo. She will help with the discussion. It is my recommendation that this fee be in place before receive our first request for a liquor license so that the fee is z~ot set, in part, based on the identity of the flicant involved. If you wish to change the fee, a public hearing must be called for thirty days from now. #10. Workshops The Jan 30 workshop will include presentation of the phone survey results, presentation of the plan options for fire, police and city hall, and a presentation of the financing options. This meeting has enough material to last four hours. The Feb 13 workshop will include a recap of all the pieces of the downtown redevelopment and their costs, followed by a discussion about the withdrawal of Gramercy Corp and what to do next. This meeting has enough material to last three hours. #ll.D. Peter Meyer Fund Raiser Mayor Meisel directed staff to proceed with the fiscal management for the Peter Meyer fundraiser if the required clearance was acquired. She specifically indicated that it need not return to a future council meeting. Human Resources Update Congratulations to Bonnie Ritter, who was promoted from temporary Acting City Clerk, to City Clerk for the City of Mound, effective Dec 23, 2001! Bonnie's contributions since her start as a temp in Feb last year contributed to the decision to hire from within. Welcome, Bonnie! I would like to welcome Mike Anderson, a former Mound resident, now living in St Bonifacious, to the Public aOrks Department. Mike comes with credentials in water and wastewater operations from St Cloud Tech. ving just graduated in January, this is his first position in his field. Mike will begin the week of January 21. Say "hi" to Mike. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 8, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers at 5341 Maywood Road in said City. Counciimembers Present.: Mayor Pa~ Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney, John Dean; City Manager, Kandis Hanson; City Clerk, Bonnie Ritter; Community Development Director, Sarah Smith; City Engineer, John Cameron; Finance Director, Gino Businaro; Crv Burma, Frankand Betty Weiland, Mary Sherman, Julie Weisenborn, Bruce McKeeman, Kelly and Jeh~':Andersen, Lorrie Ham, Erin Wombacher. 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:57...p.i:~'~. :and the ple~e~of Allegiance was recited. Mayor Meisel apologized to the public.f~.~the lat~:'~Start of th~ Council meeting. The HRA meeting held previously ran late. City Manager 'Hanson requested the addi{~n::~::~i~m~,~Ai;~:ii?~i~Ppointments'~:~:" :'=:~: :'~:~:~::::::~:'~' '::~ ::'~;~' to boards and commissions..Mayor Meisel also re~uesteaiiiiii~e~!ii"':~:~:~:~!;:~placed after item 8. Brown requested the addition of 12A, ~!~erciai a~k fees. MOTION by Hanus, second~dby B~::~e~:.:.~p~rove the agenda as amended. All voted 3. CONSENT AG. ::i~:. Mayor Meisel requested the r~ovai' of 3D from the consent agenda. MOTION by Brown s~de~;~;~i~ Osmek to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll -call vote, all v~{~!iiih favor. Motion carded. A. Approve Minutes of the December 10, 2001 special meeting and the December 11, 2001 regular meeting. B. Approve .payment ef claims in the amount of $471,230.63. C. RESOLUTION NO. 02-01: RESOLUTION APPOINTING GINO BUSlNARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR, ACTING CITY MANAGER FOR 2002. D. (removed) E. RESOLUTION NO. 02.92: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK F. RESOLUTION NO. 02.03: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CiTY TREASURER/FINANCE DIRECTOR -335- Mound City Gounell rM~nut~ -- January 8, 2002 G, RESOLUTION NO. 02..04: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR 20.02 H. RESOLUTION NO. 024)5: RESOLUTION APPOINTING COUNCILMEMBER MARK HANUS AS ACTING MAYOR FOR 2002 I. RESrOLUTION NO. 0265: RESOLUTION APPOINTING JIM FACKLER AS ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR 2002 J. Approval of ~ee removal license for Tree Top Service,'lnc., Oelano, MN, to expire en Mar~ 3:1, 2002. 3D, MOTION by .~own, seconded by Osmek to adopt the fQ~ing resolution.. The felt'owing voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Osmek ~i~:'Meyer. The following voted in the nega(ive: None. Mayor Mei~ abstained f[e~:"~ti~g due to the fact that The Laker is a tenant in a building that she owns, Me[!~i~ car~i~?:~ RESOLUTION NO, 02.07: RESOLUTION DESI~::~TING THE ~ER AS THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER' FOR 2002 iiii!iiiiiiiii!!,~ PRESENT ON ANY ITEM 4. AND NOT ON THE AGENDA Bruce McKeeman, 17~ Av~t Lane, for the wo~ the City has done Frank Weiland, Mayor, Leighton Leiland. expressing appreciation program. t~i~Council of the death of former Mound John Andersen, 1 on discussions that the Dreamwood residents have ~'~!'~ .... ~'~'~ · i:i ........... commons issue. ====================== s. ME'mOPLA NS SUSD WS 0NAGEEEMENT Sarah smith revjewed ~i~e~aiVi%on agreement, staling that it is the sister agreement to the one approved by t~?R~ earlier in the evening. Meyer exPressed concern over funding of the playground equipment and was informed that that amount wii;I be assessed in total against MetrOPlains. He also questioned the absence of a sewer trunk area ~arge; MOTION by Meyer to add $1500/unit Sewer Trunk Area Charge to the: agreement, Motion diedfor lack of a second. It was explained to.MeYer that the reason for this not being included, is that this charge was already paid by a previous owner of the property. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the Subdivision Agreement Mound Visions 2~ Addition Subdivision, wi[h MetroPlains. The following voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted in the negative: Meyer. Motion carried. 2 -336- Mound CAy Coun¢il Minutes - January 8, 2002 6A. ACTION ON ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 600 OF THE CITM CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Sarah Smith reviewed the proposed ordinance. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to pass the following ordinance. The following voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted in the negative: Meyer. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 01-2002: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 600 OF THE CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 6B, ACTION ON ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 610 OF=THE CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE WATER DEPARTMENT MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to pass the :::I::;:::::;:;:;:: All voted in favor. Motion carried. ':~iiii:.i~. ORDINANCE NO. 02-2002: AN ORDINANCE ~MiENDING SECTION 610 OF THE CITY CODE AS ITiiiiRELATES TO THE WATER DEPARTMENT. 6C. ACTION ADOPTING FEE SCHED01~ii?~ii.~.~:.~?.~.:.:...... MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus t~!iad~(~?~he:.,:.foii~Wing resolution. Al: voted in favor. Motion carried. ' 'iii iii RESOLUTION NO. 02-08: ,::R~$OLU~IoN A~PTING FEE SCHEDULE Sarah Smith reviewe~;;~e~ue~(~with ~mments following by City Engineer, John This request is to ~edake g~ding activities within the Gull Lane right-of-way and ~otta Commons so t'~::dra::i~ge in and around the lower level garage area ~n be appropriately diveded a~;~rom the existing home. The appli~nt indicted that the prope~y is subject to flooding problems due to improper drainage. The Docks and Commons Commission has recommended approval of the appli~tion. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the warrants of removing the existing asphalt, grading, and replacing with aspha!t, or replacing with soft surface. Also discussion took place as to the exact placement of the correction and who is fiscally responsible for this improvement. Mary Sherman expressed concern regarding the restoration activities and the use of sod and landscaping materials as it may negatively affect her ability to maneuver her vehicle and horse trailer which are often stored at her 5065 Wren Road property. 3 -337- Mound City Court=ii Minut~ - J=nuary 8, 2i)02 MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus, to have the City r~eplace the temporary patch that was placed en Gull. Lane, with a permanent asphalt repair te extend from the existing manhole te the Commons line, with asphalt te continue to the garage apron at 1733 Gull Lane. After diseussion, Brown withdrew his motion, With Andersen: owning this property less than a year, Osmek asked if the drainage problem was disclosed by the seller of the property, and Andersen stated that i~t hadn't been disc~sed. MOTION by Brown, sec, ended by Osmek te repair Gull Lane a~ding to the City Engineer's recommendation, extending the repair to the gar~:~'apron of the property at 1733 Gull Lane. Meyer offered as an amendment, that M[~iiii~:....~derson be responsible for 1/3 of the cost of this improvement: BrOwn refused the~~pnt, stating that he feels the City caused the problem with previous pat~':!i~:Ot being~ii~.ne as it should, and all but about 2' of the ama. in question is city prepe~?~ The follo~i~:::=~voted in the affirmative on the foregoing motion: Brown, Ha~i~ Mei~el and os~ek. The following voted in the negative: Meyer. Motion carried. "%iiiiiiiiiiii?~i~:~.~...::~,~:~iiii!ii?'!?' MOTION by Hanus, seconded by OsmeEii?i~ ~pt t~i~!~!owing resolution. All voted in RESOLUTION NO. 02-09= g Crv Burma a Conservation Di~t 'A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR AT 1733 GULL LANE, LoT 9, BLOCK i. WIOTTA COMMONS DIDATE INTERVIEW as applicant to the Lake Minnetonka Directors. Mayor Meisel asked=:i!it~,Bu~!¥ecognize-'=:~ ~::i~:~:. :.:.:~:.:. that this is a liaison position, expressing the thoughts of the City an~ii~Council. She asked if he would be willing, should he be appointed, te report to th~ouncil on a quarterly basis, unless there is a hot item that needs to be reported before that. Hanus also expressed that this is not a commission appointment where personal opinions are looked for. This person represents the Council and; their positions. Mr~ Burma stated he made this appli~tion for one reason, being to offer his servicos to the City in the capacity asked for. He understands the position and will execute it to the best of his ability. MOTION by Meyer, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-10: RESOLUTION APPOINTING ORVIN BURMA TO THE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT (LMCD) BOARD OF DIRECTORS. 4 -338- Mound City Cour=ll Minutes - January 8, 2002 -insert item 13 as requested during agenda approval- At 10:15 the Council entered into Executive Session to consider client/attorney privileged information. 13. EXECUTIVE SES.SION TO DISCUSS.LE~ER FROM MARC SIMPSON REGARDING pOTENTIAL L!T!GATI0N ON DREAMW00D COMMONR The Coun~l' returned from Executive SessiOn and City Attorney John Dean explained that this matter involved discussion regarding a letter received from the attorney of abutting property owners in Dreamwood Addition, which is attorney/client privileged information. ~.::~iiii~.: 9, APPOINTMENT OF COUNClLMEMBERS TO VARIOUSiiBOARD AND COMMISSIONS ~:~i?~:~i~, MOTION bY Hanus, seconded by Brown to adePt thef°ilowing?'~:~i~lution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. .ESO.U O..o. .ESOLU;,O. ;O DOCKS AN. DCOMM0~:=iiCOMMISSlON, SOB BROWN T© THE P~ING. COM~ISSlON ~ND DAVID OSMEK TO THE pAR~$' ~QPE~?'SPACE COMMISSION. 9A. APPOINTMENTS TO. BQ~R~ND ~M!SSlONS MOTION bY arewn, se~nd~d~?~by Ha~e r~ppoint John Boise and Norm Domholt to the Parks ~d Open Spa~mmi~==~=~:~=:.:=m~mmended by the POSAC and to re- appoint Jim Funk and Grog ~~ the .D:~s and Commissions Commission as re~mmended by the~D~C~ AJi~?~;e~ed in favor Motion ~ied. MOTION by Han~se~nded~y Osmek to re-appoint .Frank Weiland, Michael Mueller, and Geoff Mi~ael:=t~e Pian~i~g Commission, as re~mmended by the Planning Commission, All vot~ fa~ Mmien ~ied LA o. OF =OU O LELS LOCAL 3S osmek queSti0ned ~e proposed ~ange under Dis~Pl~e. The proPosed language states .that at the request of ~e employee, all oral er wriEen reprimands wilt be removed from ~heir perseR~l file after 18 months..., with ex~pfions as stated in State law. City Manager Hanson e~plained that the Minnesota Data Pra~ices Act would be taken under ~nsideration in this ~se. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in the affirmative: BroWn, Hanus, Meisel and Meyer. The following voted in the negative: Osmek. Motion carried. 5 -339- Meur~d City Couw-..ii Minute~ - Jemmry 8, 2~02 RESOLUTION NO. 02-12: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CI~ OF MOUND AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (LELS) LOCAL 35, POUCE SERGEANTS, FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2002 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003. 11. LABOR CONTRACT.BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND.LOCAL 320 MOTION by Brown, sounded by Meyer to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO, 02-13: RESOLUTION APPROVING TH~?~ii~OR CONTRACT BE~EEN THE CI~ OF MO~D. AND MINNESOTA T~MSTERS PUBLIC ANDi!'~i~'~=~!ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES' UNION, ~L N~!i~0. 12. DISCUSSION ON LIFEGUARD AND SENIO~'~iii~EN~ER FuNi~i~ISER, AS Meyer explained to the C°un~l that because of ~?~t ~ing funds designated in the 2002 budget for the lif~uard program e~(h~pnior ~i~ens, he is planning a ~ndraiser. This fundrai~r involves him sleeping in ~~ te~(?~for the rest of Janua~ and all of Febm:a~, or until ~0,000 is raised, ~e~[~es first. He is pro~sing that $32,000 .of the~ funds ge te ~g~ard~am, with the ~i~ of $8,0~ going as a donation to the senior citizen?~::' Of':~h d~l~ ~n~ibuted, .80 will ge to ~ lifeguard program, and .20 to the ~s. He~~jn~approv~ on having the Cit~y a~ as ~e fis~l agent until al.I monies '~!~ed ~disseminated. Meyer stated that he realizes that this is a ::~:~.e~ [else money, but he feels strongly a~ut doing it, and Osmek informed":{~Council t~t he amd Councilmember Brown met ~ith ~e V~ and they have don.at~ {~0 ~d [he IEeguard program already. T~y al~ plan on meeting'with ~e Li~s'::~::::~6 ~eri~n L~ien fer d~atiens. Osmek r~iv~ a repo~ frem the ~ool en'peak times that e~r bea~es are us~ and feels that $15,~0 to $16,~0 will ~ver lif~uards for those ~ak times. Osmek continued by expressing ~n~rn. over the City's liability if ~ey ~n~ion Meyer's fundraiser and s~ething should physi~lly happen te Meyer. Meyer e~ressed he is willing te take full responsibility for his own weffare. Staff will c~eck what, the City's liability would be for Meyer's proposal. Meisel stated her r~ncern over the liability, but has no problem with the proposal if there is no chance for legal recourse. 6 -340- Mound City Council Minutes - January 8, 2002 1~. COMMERClAL.D.OCK FEES Brown stated ~'at.he has been informed that Seahorse COndos received a notice on their upcoming cemmemial doek fees, but that these are privately held dOe~S. City Manager Hanson will look into ~is and report at a later meeting. 13. (rearranged en agenda - after item 8) 14. 15. ADJOURN MOTION bY Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 11:22 p.m. Motion carried. !~NFORMATION/MISCELLANEOU$ A. AMMFax News B. Friday Fax C. LMCD correspondence D. Westonka Healthy Community Colla:borative~::~;~ual report & request Meyer asked if this had to be addressed aD~:~:~son informed him that because the Skate Park is on City pro~, it is ~i~ady assumed that the City act as fiscal agent .... E. Articles: re Rail Ii:ne F. Westonka Public Schools news G. Letter & Giilespie Gazette newslette??~iii::iii?::' H. A~i¢le & letter: Minnesota M~i~pal B~mg.e Association on municipal liquor operations !. Letter: City of th® Village of ~ K. Finance RepoA;i:ii~ve~r N. Letter: ~i:.of ~ii~heriff . O. Let~te~:i!~iiiiiiiE~::~ne~ Communications Commission P. 20B~EegiSlativ~?:~.~ried~i~S ef the MN chamber of Commer~ Q.. Lett~??etropeli~n Council R. Rep'o~?~.~200t COmmunity Ed/Pa~k & Rec Program All voted in favor. Attest: City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 7 -341 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/02 3:08 PM Page 1 Current Period: January 2002 Batch Name 010202SUE Payments Refer 10202 CONCO, INCORPORATED E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest Cash Payment Invoice 010202 Cash Payment Invoice 010202 Transaction Date Rear 10202 User Dollar Amt $36,331.45 Computer Dollar Amt $4,594.44 ($31,737.01) Out of Balance Ck# 6006 1/2/2002 01-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE 01-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $481,15 $480.69 1/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $961.84 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS Ck# 6007 1/2/2002 E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 01-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $253.41 $415.70 Total $669.11 Cash Payment Invoice 010202 Cash Payment Invoice 010202 Transaction Date 01-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE E 455-46381~611 Bond Interest 1/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 10202 SHORELINE PLAZA Ck# 6008 1/2/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 01-02 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL SPACE $2,638.49 Invoice 010202 Transaction Date 1/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,638.49 ~,efer 10202 SPORTING BREED KENNELS Ck# 6009 1/2/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees 01-02 DOG KENNEL FEE $325.00 Invoice 010202 Transaction Date 1/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $325.00 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 455 TIF 1-2 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $325.00 $1,630.95 $2,638.49 $4,594.44 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $4,594.44 $o.oo $4,594.44 -342- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/04/02 2;35 PM Page 1 Current Period: January 2002 Batch Name 010402SUE User Dollar Amt~ $357,80 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $357.80 $0.00 In Balance Refer 10402 PETTY'CASH 1/4/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH, MISC ITEMS Invoice 010402 PO 16740 Transaction Date 1/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 10402 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, / 1/4/2002 E 101-43100-208 Training and Instruction REGISTRATION PO 17030 E 601-49400-208 Training and Instruction REGISTRATION PO 17030 11412002 Cash Payment Invoice 010402 Cash Payment Invoice 010402 Transaction Date $38.26 Total $38.26 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $75.00 $75.00 Total $150. O0 Refer 10402 HEITZ, DONALD I/4/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22810 X-Mas Lights Donation/Expe REIMBURSE CHRISTMAS LIGHTS Invoice 010402 Transaction Date 1/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $169.54 Total ......... ~:5-,~ Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $244.54 $75.00 $38.26 $357.80 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $357.80 $357.80 -343- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: January 2002 Batch Name Rear 117028 Cash Payment Invoice Transaction Date 1/2/2002 Fund Summary 601 WATER FUND 01-08-02SUE User Dollar Amt $32,129.96 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $32,129.96 $0.00 In Balance THURK BROTHERS CHEVROLET 1/3/2002 E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA TRUCK 2002 6.5 EXT CAB TRUCK PO 17028 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $32,129.96 $32,129.96 $32,129.96 Total $32,129.96 01/03/02 10:58 AM Page 1 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $32,129.96 $32,129.96 -344- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:04 PM Page 1 Current Period: January 2002 Batch Name Refer 10902 0109025UE User Dollar Amt $04,869.89 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $64,869.89 $0.00 In Balance AMERICAN EXPRESS 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA DIGITAL CAMERAS (3) $746.85 Invoice 122301 PO 17145 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous ELECTRONIC ERASER $36.44 Invoice 122701 Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Training and Instruction LODGING, SAN FRANCISO, CA $816.84 invoice 120901 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER MONITORS (3) $591.00 Invoice 121701 PO 17142 Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Training and Instruction MEAL EXPENSE (6) $52.92 Invoice 121801 Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Training and Instruction LODGING, ALEXANDER $49.19 Invoice 121301 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous CREDIT--RETURN MERCHANDISE -$94.21 Invoice Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,199.03 ~efer 10902 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE 1/9/2002 Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $70.20 Invoice 55136510 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $70.20 Refer 10902 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous EMBROIDER LOGOS $42.60 Invoice 122801 PO 17151 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $42.60 Refer 10902 AT&T 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone 12-01 952-250-0429 $34.71 Invoice 122601 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $34.71 Refer 10902 ATHENA CARPET CLEANING 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic CARPET CLERK'S OFFICE $85.20 Invoice 2276 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $85.20 Refer 10902 BECK, KENNETH 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 2001 REIMBURSE PHYSICAL FITNESS $49.88 Invoice 122901 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $49.88 Refer 10902 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,672.03 Invoice 22941800 OF?saction Date 1/1012002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,672.03 fe~10902 BL~~ACKOWIAK~'~AND~SO~'~N ROLL"~'~¢FF 1/9/200~~ ..... Cash Payment R 101-32240 Animal Licenses 12-01 GARBAGE PICKUP $31.66 Invoice 10114969 -345- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:04 PM Page 2 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 10114969 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 10114969 Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 10114970 Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 10115023 Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 10114898 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 12-01 GARBAGE PICKUP 12-01 GARBAGE PICKUP 12-01 GARBAGE PICKUP #CMR0121 12-01 GARBAGE PICKUP #CMR0308 12-01 GARBAGE PICKUP #CliP0085 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $31.66 $31.67 $67.01 $52.60 $17.76 $232.36 Refer 10902 BRAND NETWORKING Cash Payment Invoice 15441 Transaction Date E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 1/9/2002 1/9/2002 COMPUTER TRAINING Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,381.05 $1,381.05 Refer 10902 BUSINARO, GINO Cash Payment Invoice 010602 Transaction Date G 101-20500 Pre-Tax Medical 1/9/2002 1/9/2002 2001 REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $157.83 $157.83 Refer 10902 CARGIL SALTDIVISION 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials BULK ICE Invoice 21863345 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,041.03 $2,041.03 Refer 10902 CHADWICK AND MERTZ Cash Payment Invoice 010402 Transaction Date E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 1/9/2002 1/9/2002 12-01 PROFESSIONAL SERIVCES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,644.00 $5,644.00 Refer 10902 CHAMPION AUTO 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair BLADES Invoice D125800 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair WHEEL COVER Invoice D125806 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair WHEEL COVER Invoice D125839 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $29.79 $6.38 $2.13 10100 Total $38.30 Rear 10902 Cash Payment Invoice 12518 Cash Payment Invoice 12518 Cash Payment Invoice Transaction Date CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, .1/9/2002 E 602-49450-351 Legal Notices Publishing 12-08-01 MAINTENANCE POSITION E 602-49450-351 Legal Notices Publishing 12-15-01 MAINTENANCE POSITION E 602-49450-351 Legal Notices Publishing 12-22-01 MAINTENANCE POSITION 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $93.00 $93~00 $93.00 $279.00 Refer 10201 DA Y DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 33325 BEER $1,494.90 -346- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:04 PM Page 3 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Current Period: January 2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,494,90 Refer 10902 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 183601 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 185729 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BER Invoice 185730 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $76.00 $2,4O7.25 $25.20 $2,508.45 Refer 10902 EQUIPMENT SUPPl_ Y, INCORPOR 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings INSTALL DAMPER, ETC Invoice 181720 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $626.92 $626.92 Refer 10902 Cash Payment Invoice 870699 Cash Payment Invoice 870699 Cash Payment nvoice 870699 Payment Invoice 870699 Cash Payment Invoice 870699 Cash Payment Invoice 870699 Cash Payment Invoice 870700 Cash Payment Invoice 870701 Transaction Date G & K SERVICES 1/9/2002 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-25-01 UNIFORMS PO 20279 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-25-01 UNIFORMS PO 20279 E 602-49450-101 Full-Time Employees Re 12-25-01 UNIFORMS PO 20279 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials PO 20279 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials PO 20279 E 602-49450-230 Shop MateriaLs PO 20279 12-25-01 MATS 12-25-01 MATS 12-25-01 MATS E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 12-25-01 MATS PO 20284 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 12-25-01 MATS PO 20285 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $21.29 $21.29 $21.29 $28.29 $28.29 $28.29 $47.28 $121.94 $317,96 Refer 10902 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Cash Payment E Invoice 123101-A Cash Payment E Invoice 123101-A Cash Payment E Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E Invoice 123101-C Cash Payment E Invoice 123101-C Cash Payment E Invoice 123101-C Payment E 123101-D Transaction Date 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous 1/9/2002 1/9/2002 12-01 WATER #5158500 12-01 WATER #5158500 12-01 WATER #5158501 12-01 WATER #5158502 12-01 WATER #5158502 12-01 WATER #5158502 12-01 WATER #32345800 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $35.27 $35,26 $33.37 $11.19 $11.19 $11.19 $22.31 $159.78 Refer 10902 GRADY, DANIEL 1/9/2002 -347- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:04 PM Page 4 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Transaction Date Current Period: January 2002 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2001 BOOT ALLOWANCE 1/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $75.00 $75.00 Refer 10902 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment Invoice 482343 Cash Payment Invoice 482569 Cash Payment invoice 483620 Transaction Date E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 WINE WINE WINE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $944.50 $1,817.65 $89.70 $2,851.85 Refer 10902 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals Invoice DM67434 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 CONTAINER DEMURRAGE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5.00 $5.00 Refer 10902 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment Invoice 32433 Cash Payment Invoice 32433 Cash Payment Invoice 32433 Cash Payment Invoice 32498 Transaction Date E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 SHOP SERVICE SHOP SERVICE SHOP SERVICE KEY RACK Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $17.03 $17.03 $17.04 $46.38 $97.48 Refer 1065 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals Invoice 123101 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 2001 ANNUAL RADIO LEASE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,930.43 $1,930.43 Refer 10902 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners Invoice 000330 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 11-01 ROOM AND BOARD Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,492.00 $1,492.00 Refer 10902 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41550-440 Other Contractual Servic 2002 TRUTH TAXATION Invoice 122601 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $724.52 $724.52 Refer 10902 HOFF, KATIE Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Transaction Date E 281-45210-331 Travel Expenses 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 2001 REIMBURSE MIl_AGE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $52.53 $52.53 Refer 10902 HOME DEPOT/GECF Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 001194/6020170 Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply invoice 001194/6020170 · 1/9/2002 TOOL PACK DESK LEGS $605.99 $23.32 -348- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:04 PM Page 5 Current Period: January 2002 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $629.31 Refer 10902 IKON OFFICE MACHINES 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA FAX MACHINE PURCHASE $1,976.64 Invoice 2355465A Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,976.64 Refer 10902 ISLAND PARK SKELL Y 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLY, INC. $435.36 Invoice 9415 Cash Payment E 10t-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 9425 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $33.84 Invoice 9510 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery COOLANT, ETC. $82.24 Invoice 9518 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE REPAIR $57.00 Invoice 9585 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $634.30 Refer 10902 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORA TED Cash Payment nvoice 44069 [nsaction Date E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 2001 WINTER CITY CONTACT $1,514.43 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,514.43 Refer 10902 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-331 Travel Expenses Invoice 121001 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 COUNCIL COOKIES $9.02 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $9.02 Refer 10902 KRYCK, ROGER 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Training and Instruction REIMBURSE TRAVEL ADVANCE Invoice 010902 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $176.24 Total $176.24 Refer 10902 LAKE MINNETONKA CHAMBER CO Cash Payment Invoice 0003422 Transaction Date E 101-41110-331 Travel Expenses 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 12-01 MEMBERSHIP LUNCH Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $15.00 Total $15.00 Refer 10902 LARSON PRODUCTS, INC. Invoice E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 8794240 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials Invoice 8794240 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 8794240 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 8798487 Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials ~voice 8798487 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 8798487 1/9/2002 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.69 $30.69 $30.69 $11.92 $11.92 $11.91 -349- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:04 PM Page 6 Current Period: January 2002 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Refer 10902 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 11038107 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $127.82 1/9/2002 11-26-01 CLAIM ADAMS, JENNIFER $620.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $620,00 Refer 10902 LOWELL'S AUTOMOTIVE 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BELT Invoice 5-331898 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE PADS, ETC Invoice 5-333415 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 5-333347 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials Invoice 5-333347 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 5-333347 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 $34.O4 $134.77 WHEEL WEIGHTS $8.62 WHEEL WEIGHTS $8,62 WHEEL WEIGHTS $8.61 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $194.66 Refer 10902 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment Invoice 10271 Cash Payment Invoice 10293 Cash Payment Invoice 10307 Cash Payment Invoice 10323 Cash Payment Invoice 10339 Transaction Date E 609-49750-265 Freight E 609-49750-265 Freight E 609-49750-265 Freight E 609-49750-265 Freight E 609-49750-265 Freight 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 12-17-01 DELIVERY CHARGE $17.60 12-20-01 DELIVERY CHARGE $236.80 12-26-01 DELIVERY CHARGE $42.40 12-28-01 DELIVERY CHARGE $46.40 12-31-01 DELIVERY CHARGE $26.40 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $369.60 Refer 10902 METRO WEST INSPECTIONS 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-170 Fire Chief-Officer Pay 12-01 FIRE INSPECTIONS $437.50 Invoice 123101 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $437,50 Refer 10902 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR 1/9/2002 Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 12-01 SAC CHARGES $4,554.00 Invoice 123101 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,554.00 Refer 10902 MINNEAPOLIS DEPARTMENT HEA 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-305 Medical and Dental Fees 12-01 ANALYSIS CONTROLLED Invoice 01-003,239 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 10902 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INCO 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Pa~ts SLIDE SECTION Invoice 668129 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $85.00 Total $85.00 $350.31 Total $350.31 Refer 10902 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO .1/9/2002 -350- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10102 2:04 PM Page 7 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment invoice 122101 Transaction Date E 455-46378-300 Professional Srvs 1/10/2O02 Refer 10902 MURRAY, WILLIAM Cash Payment Invoice 123001 Transaction Date E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 1/10/2002 09-26-01 THRU 12-18-01 PRO SERVICES $405.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 1/9/2002 2001 PHYSICAL FITNESS Total $405,00 $65,00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $65,00 Refer 10902 MYERS, TONY 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Training and Instruction REIMBURSE TRAVEL ADVANCE Invoice 123101 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $16.87 Total $16,87 Refer 10902 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Payment nvoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 ;ash Payment aice 121801 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PA/V) E 101-43100-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephone E 101-43100-321 Telephone E 101-43100-321 Telephone E 101-43100-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 101-43100-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 60249450-321 Telephone E 101-45200-321 Telephone E 281-45210-321 Telephone E 101-41310-321 Telephone E 101-43100-321 Telephone 1/9/2002 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #16 JOHNSON, TIM 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #17 POUNDER, CHRIS 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #18 HARDINA, DAMON 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-0I #19 KlVlSTO, SCO'I-r 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #20 GRADY, DAN 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #21 HEITZ, FRANK 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #22 HETIZ, DON 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #23 KESTNER, AL 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #07 SKINNER GREG 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01, #07 SKINNER GREG 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #07 SKINNER GREG 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 221-6812 #15 FACKLER, JIM 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 221-6813 #16 HOFF KATIE 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 221-6814 RAHN, JODI 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 221-6822 #02 NELSON JOYCE $38.77 $38.77 $38.77 $77.53 $38.77 $38.77 $38.77 $77.53 $27.O0 $27.OO $27.00 $84.17 $84.17 $38.77 $12.92 -351 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:16 PM Page 8 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Transaction Date E 601-49400-321 Telephone 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 221-6822 #02 NELSON JOYCE $12.92 E 602-49450-321 Telephone 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 221-6822 #02 NELSON JOYCE $12.93 E 101-45200-321 Telephone 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 221-8385 #13 SWARTZER, BRAIN $38.77 E 101-42400-321 Telephone 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 #14 GEISE LEE $38.77 E 101-42400-321 Telephone 11-19-01 THRU 12-19-01 282-5889 #15 SUTHERLAND JON $84.17 E 101-42400-321 Telephone 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 36305883 NORLANDER, JILL $65.10 E 602-49450-321 Telephone #627106 NEW PHONE $119.02 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,060.39 Refer 10902 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Cash Payment Invoice 121801 Transaction Date E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone E 1-01-42110-321 Telephone E 10142110-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6400 OFFICE 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6401 CHIEF 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6402 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01292-6402 SRO 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6404 INVESTIGATORS 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6405 SQUAD #840 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6406 SQUAD #842 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6407 DARE 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6408 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 SQUAD #845 11-19-01 THRU 12-18-01 292-6410 CSO Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 10902 PEDERSON, GREG 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Training and Instruction REIMBURSE TRAVEL ADVANCE Invoice 123101 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $39.27 $40.60 $39.27 $40.14 $49.13 $39.27 $39.27 $39.27 $41.94 $39.27 $43.20 Total $450.63 $274.36 Total $274.36 -352- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:16 PM Page 9 Current Period: January 2002 Refer 10902 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 20284580 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $90.31 10100 Total $90.31 Refer 10902 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC 1/9/2002 Cash Payment Invoice 790882 Transaction Date E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale 1/10/2002 WINE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $779.40 Total $779.40 Refer 10902 PINE CITY COURTHOUSE Cash Payment Invoice 50288 Transaction Date G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow 1/10~20O2 1/9/2002 WARRANT #6692 SVOBODA, AMBER $100.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 10902 PRESS NEWS PUBLICATIONS 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-351 Legal Notices Publishing 12-24-01 MAINTENANCE CLASSIFIED Invoice 02522780-001 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $55.50 Total $55.50 Refer 10902 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 12-01 AIR AND OXYGEN $22.78 voice R12011070 Refer 10902 SERVICE MASTER CLEAN 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 01-02 CLEANING CITY HALL $1,096.95 Invoice 9696 Cash Payment Invoice 9696 Cash Payment Invoice 9696 Cash Payment Invoice 9696 Transaction Date E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-02 CLEANING P/W E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-02 CLEANING P/W E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-02 CLEANING P/W 1/1012002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $39.05 $39.05 $39.05 $1,214,10 Refer 10902 SHORELINE PHOTO 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 12-18-01 PHOTO PROCESSING invoice 41473 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 41514 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 12-19-10 PHOTO PROCESSING Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $11.18 $10.85 $22.03 Refer 10902 SMITH, SARAH Cash Payment Invoice 122801 Transaction Date G 101-20500 Pre-Tax Medical 1/10~2002 1/9/2002 2001 REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $180.83 $180.83 Refer 10902 SOS PRINTING gash Payment nvoice 63433 Cash Payment Invoice 63436 E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees E 101-42110-203 Printed Forms 1/9/2002 DOG/CAT LICENSES ENVELOPES, FORMS, ETC. $190.10 $854.13 -353- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:16 PM Page 10 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 63458 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Refer 10902 SPEED WA Y SUPERAMERICA (FIR Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 122201 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 LETTERHEAD AND ENVELOPES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total 1/9/2002 THRU 12-22-01 GASOLINE CHARGES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $193.99 $1,238.22 $239,30 $239.30 Refer 10902 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (P/W Cash Payment E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Transaction Date E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #10 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #11 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #13 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #16 THRU 12-26-01 VEHClLE #02 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #20 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #21 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #22 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #25 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #03 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #30 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #32 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #04 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #05 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE 306 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #07 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #08 THRU 12-26-01 VEHICLE #09 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $144.79 $131.66 $74.90 $168.13 $57,21 $73.9O $80.06 $169.73 $118.42 $8984 $18.96 $114.14 $68.76 $48.24 $82.37 $50.46 $33.17 $89.30 Total $1,614.04 Refer 10902 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 122601 1/9/2002 THRU 12-26-01 GASOLINE CHARGES $54.70 -354- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01110/02 2:16 PM Page 11 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Current Period: January 2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $54.70 Refer 10201 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (POL Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Transaction Date E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 THRU 12-26-01 GASOLINE CHARGES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 To~l $805.95 $805.95 Refer 10201 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment Invoice 8982 Cash Payment Invoice 7708 Cash Payment Invoice 7709 Cash Payment invoice 7710 Transaction Date E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities E 222-42260-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 TREE LIGHTING REPAIR STREET LIGHT REPAIR POLE #46 REPAIR THREE LIGHTS Marquette Bank Mou 10100 To~l $72.00 $286.00 $98.46 $131.77 $588.23 Refer 10902 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts TIRES Invoice 158992 Cash Payment E 602-49450-101 Full-Time Employees Re TIRES O nvoice 158917 ransaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 To~l $485.46 $489.5O $974.96 Refer 10902 SUN BADGE COMPANY 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies RESERVE BADGES Invoice 220907 PO 17119 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou Refer 10902 SUN NEWSPAPERS 1/9/2002 Cash Payment Invoice 474164 Transaction Date 10100 E 602-49450-101 Full-Time Employees Re 12-19-01 MAINTENANCE CLASSIFIED 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total Total $1,778.50 $1,778.50 $336.25 $336.25 Refer 109201 SUPERIOR PLUMBING AND HEATI Cash Payment Invoice 542 Transaction Date E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 BALL VALVE AND COUPLING Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $188,17 $188.17 Refer 10902 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN 1/9/2002 Cash Payment Invoice 207827 Cash Payment Invoice 211848 Transaction Date E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale BEER E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale BEER 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $261.00 $282.00 $543.00 Rear 10902 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 ~,ash Payment 123101 Cash Payment invoice 123101 TRUE VALUE, MOUND 1/9/2002 E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $35.56 $231.10 $2.33 -355- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:16 PM Page 12 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies G 101-22810 X-Mas Lights Donation/Expe MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Total 1/9/2002 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE APPOINTMENT BOOKS NOTEBOOKS, ETC, MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Transaction Date 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 10902 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327931-0 PO 17209 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies invoice 327940-0 PO 17149 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328095-0 PO 17149 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies invoice 328151-0 $18.94 $104.25 $104.25 $104.22 $3.29 $42.84 $14.24 $206.99 $6.37 $874.38 $2.37 $2.37 $2.37 $2.37 $2,37 $0.79 $0.79 $1.19 $1,21 $93.66 $19.O7 $31.26 $1.01 $1.01 $1.01 -356- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:16 PM Page 13 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies 328251-0 sh Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Date 1/10/2002 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES DISKS CALENDARS CALENDARS CALENDARS FLOOR MAT MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES APPOINTMENT BOOK APPOINTMENT BOOK APPOINTMENT BOOK Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1.01 $1.01 $0.34 $0.34 $0.51 $0.51 $57.48 $11.63 $11.63 $11.63 $135.84 $15.03 $15.03 $15.03 $15.03 $15.03 $501 $5.01 $7.52 $7.52 $10.30 $33.02 $10.12 $548.43 Refer 10902 UNIFORMS LIMITED 1/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42115-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING Invoice 17113 $650.65 -357- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/02 2:16 PM Page 14 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment Invoice 17146 Cash Payment Invoice 17144 Transaction Date E 101-42115-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms 1/10/2002 NAME BAR UNIFORMS FOR HARRELL Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total Refer 10902 US FILTER Cash Payment Invoice 8019916 Transaction Date E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 CAPS, ETC. $14.67 $344.67 $1,009.99 $82.20 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $82.20 Rear 10902 Cash Payment Invoice 4915 Cash Payment Invoice 4916 Cash Payment Invoice 4917 Cash Payment Invoice 4918 Transaction Date WIDMER, INCORPORATED 1/9/2002 E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12o01-01 BRAKE HILLCREST ROAD E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-07-01 WATERMAIN BRAKE E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-04-01 SHOREWOOD LANE HYDRANT E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-13-01 WATERLINE AT WILSHIRE/TUXEDO 1/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $560.0O $540.00 $725.00 $507.50 $2,332.50 Refer 10902 WINKLER, BOB Cash Payment Invoice 120401 Cash Payment Invoice 120601 Cash Payment Invoice 122601 Cash Payment Invoice 777260 Transaction Date 1/9/2002 E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials PO 16688 Refer 10902 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101 Transaction Date 1/10/2002 1/9/2002 BANK FILL BANK FILL CONCRETE SAND SALT Marquette Bank Mou 1/9/2002 10100 12-01 #0542-505-000-274 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $19.19 $710.58 $1,075.25 $165.77 Total $1,970.79 $4,995.21 Total $4,995.21 -358- CITY OF MOUND Payments Page 15 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND Current Period: January 2002 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $36,762.O5 $3,835.24 $136.70 $405.00 $4,038.00 $7,234.79 $12,458.11 $64,869.89 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $64,869.89 $64,869.89 -359- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/11/02 2:27 PM Page 1 Current Period: January 2002 Batch Name 011102SUE Payments Refer 11102 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 1/11/2002 Cash Payment Invoice 011102 Cash Payment Invoice 011102 Cash Payment Invoice 011102 Transaction Date User Dollar Amt $15.00 Computer Dollar Amt $15.00 $0.00 In Balance 1/11/2002 BACKGROUND CHECK $5.00 BACKGROUND CHECK $5.00 BACKGROUND CHECK $5.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15.00 Fund Summary 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $5.00 601 WATER FUND $5.00 602 SEWER FUND $5.00 $15.00 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $15.00 Total $15.00 -360- CiTY OF MOUND Payments 01117102 2:12 PM Page 1 Current Period: January 2002 Batch Name 011602SUE User Dollar Amt $154,455.69 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $154,455.69 $0.00 In Balance Refer 11602 ABDO ABDO EICK & MYERS LLP 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi THRU 12-31-01 AUDIT $1,500.00 Invoice 103570 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,500.00 Refer 11602 ANTHONYS FLORAL 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous FENSTAD, CRV FUNERAL $60.00 Invoice 15214 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous CLARK, FRAN RETIREMENT $151.00 Invoice 14635 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $211.00 Refer 11602 APACHE GROUP Cash Payment Invoice 64864 Transaction Date E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services PO 16459 1/16/2O02 Refer 11602 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE .1/16/2002 TOILET TISSUE, PAPER TOWELS $1,034.86 Marquette Bank Mou 1/16/2002 10100 Total $1,034.86 ;ash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE nvoice 55200908 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 11602 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41500-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 Cash Payment Invoice 122101 sh Payment Invoice 122101 Transaction Date E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-41500-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms $54.60 Total $54.60 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms ROBERTS EMBROIDERY HANSON EMBROIDERY SMITH EMBROIDER RITTER EMBROIDERY SCHWALBE EMBROIDERY NELSON EMBROIDERY NELSON EMBROIDER NELSON EMBROIDERY SMITH EMBROIDER NORLANDER EMBROIDER RAHN EMBROIDER DEBORD EMBROIDERY $6.39 $6.39 $6.39 $6.39 $6.39 $4.26 $4.26 $4.26 $6.39 $19.17 $6.39 $10.65 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $87.33 -361 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 2 Current Period: January 2002 Refer 11602 BANYONDATA SYSTEMS 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41920-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CONVERSION BALANCE Invoice 00008769 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $600.00 Total $600.00 Refer 11602 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 22967900 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 23006000 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS Invoice 35109600 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $2,297.80 $2,095.15 $267.84 Total $4,660.79 Refer 11602 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-331 Travel Expenses COFFEE Invoice 264822 Cash Payment E 101-42400-331 Travel Expenses COFFEE Invoice 264822 Cash Payment E 101-45200-331 Travel Expenses COFFEE Invoice 264822 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $34.00 $17.00 $17.00 10100 Total $68.00 Refer 11602 BMS INTEGRATED OFFICE TECHN 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2002 TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE Invoice 129793 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $95.00 Total $95.00 Refer 11602 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNT Cash Payment Invoice 028673 Transaction Date E 101-41920-210 Operating Supplies 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 END OF YEAR FORMS Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $165.38 Total $165, 38 Refer 11602 CAPITAL ONE 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 12-28-01 INTERNET Invoice 122801 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $4.95 Total $4.95 Refer 11602 CHIEF OF POLICE, ASSOC HENNE 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP HARRELL Invoice 011602 PO 17156 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Rear 11602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date CHIEFS POLICE ASSOC MINNESO 1/16/2002 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP HARRELL PO 17158 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP MCKINLEY PO 17158 111612002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $50.00 Total $50.00 $120.00 $120.00 Total $240.00 Refer 11602 CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone 01-02 (952) 472-3190 Invoice 123101 $30.16 -362- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 3 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123101 Cash Payment Invoice 123001 Cash Payment Invoice 123001 ;ash Payment nvoice 123001 Cash Payment Invoice 123001 Cash Payment Invoice 123001 Transaction Date E 101-42400-321 Telephone E 101-42400-321 Telephone E 101-41310-321 Telephone E 101-41310-321 Telephone E 101-41500-321 Telephone E 609-49750-321 Telephone E 609-49750-321 Telephone E 101-45200-321 Telephone E 101-41910-321 Telephone E 101-43100-321 Telephone E 601-49400-321 Telephone E 602-49450-321 Telephone E 101-42110-321 Telephone 1/16/2002 Current Period: January 2002 CREDIT (952) 472-1766 CREDIT (952) 472-0605 CREDIT (952) 472-8511 CREDIT (952) 472-1434 CREDIT (952) 495-8234 12-01 (952) 472-1686 12-01 (952) 472-3093 CREDIT (952) 472-7242 12-01 (952) 472-0600 12-01 (952) 472-1251 12-01 (952) 472-1251 12-01 (952) 472-1251 12-01 (952) 472-3711 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 -$1.84 -$1.79 -$1.79 -$1.18 -$48.49 $62.47 $169.44 -$57.24 $982.76 $339.39 $339.39 $339.38 $813.24 Total $2,963.90 Refer 11602 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 6135160 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 61275121 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $115.88 $135.76 Total $251.64 Refer 11602 CONCO, INCORPORATED Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 02-01 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE 02-01 INTEREST TRUE VALUE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $484.76 $477.08 Total $961.84 Refer 11602 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED 1/16/2002. Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-01 COPIER MAINTENANCE invoice 19111 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $340.80 Total $340.80 Refer 11602 DA Y DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1/16/2002 ;ash Payment Invoice 162877 Cash Payment Invoice 162883 E 609-49750~254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $35.30 $1,488.95 -363- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 4 Cash Payment Invoice 163739 Cash Payment Invoice 163742 Transaction Date Current Period: January 2002 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $812.00 $35.30 $2,371.55 Refer 11602 DIXCO ENGRAVING 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies NAME PLATES invoice 034514 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $12.24 $12.24 Refer 11602 DOSSETT, SINDI 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs 01-08-02 VIDEO MEETING invoice 010802 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Refer 11602 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment Invoice 186707 Cash Payment Invoice 188218 Cash Payment Invoice 188745 Cash Payment Invoice 189548 Cash Payment Invoice 191068 Transaction Date E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 1/16/2OO2 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 1/16/2002 BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER Ma~uette Bank Mou Total 10100 Total $30.00 $30.00 $240.00 $633.25 $3,831.30 $66.00 $2,701.50 $7,47205 Rear 11602 Cash Payment Invoice 19073 Cash Payment Invoice 19074 Cash Payment Invoice 19075 Cash Payment Invoice 19076 Cash Payment invoice 19077 Cash Payment Invoice 19079 Cash Payment Invoice 19112 Transaction Date EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1/16/2002 12-01 GENERAL PROFESS SERVICES E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs G 101-22851 Langdon Deveop, Gramercy G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 1/17/2002 12-01 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 12-01 GRAMERCY DEVELOPMENT 12-01 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 12-01 POST OFFICE RELOCATION 12-01 LIQUOR STORE BOND Project LIQUOR 12-01 FIRE STATION BOND Project FIRE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $187.50 $1,537.50 $562.50 $1,575.00 $675.00 $187.50 $4,557.50 $9,282.50 Refer 11602 EMPEY, BRIAN AND LISA Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues 1/16/2OO2 1/16/2002 REFUND WATER/SEWER Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $38.24 $38.24 Refer 11602 FIRE CHIEFS, INTNALASSOCIATI 1/16/2002 -364- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 5 Cash Payment Invoice 0037585 Transaction Date Current Period: January 2002 E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $160.00 Total $160.00 Refer 11602 FIRE~EMS MN STATE SCHOOL 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Training and Instruction REGISTRATION (4) Invoice 122001 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $75.00 Total $75.00 Refer 11602 FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY, INSTIT Cash Payment Invoice 121701 Cash Payment Invoice 121901 Transaction Date E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 12-17-01 EXAM ALEXANDER 12-19-01 EXAM SWENSON Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $350.00 $350.00 Total $700.00 Refer 11602 FRANK MADDEN AND ASSOCIATE Cash Payment Invoice 010102 Transaction Date E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 12-01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $38.80 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $38.80 Refer 11602 Cash Payment r~voice 877685 Payment Invoice 877685 Cash Payment Invoice 877685 Cash Payment Invoice 877685 Cash Payment Invoice 877685 Cash Payment Invoice 877685 Cash Payment Invoice 884797 Cash Payment Invoice 884795 Cash Payment Invoice 884798 Cash Payment Invoice 887794 Cash Payment Invoice 884794 Cash Payment Invoice 884794 Cash Payment Invoice 884794 ;ash Payment 884794 Cash Payment Invoice 884794 G & K SERVICES E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 20279 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 20279 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 20279 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials PO 20279 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials PO 20279 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials PO 2O279 E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies PO 20283 E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 01-08-02 MATS PO 20284 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services PO 20285 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 20279 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 20279 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 2O279 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials PO 20279 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials PO 20279 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials PO 2O279 1/16/2002 01-01-02 UNIFORMS 01-01-02 UNIFORMS 01-01-02 UNIFORMS 01-01-02 MATS 01-01-02 MATS 01-01-01 MATS 01-08-02 MATS 01-08-02 MATS 01-08-02 UNIFORMS 01-08-02 UNIFORMS 01-08-01 UNIFORMS 01-08-02 MATS 01-08-02 MATS 01-08-02 MATS $27.42 $27.42 $27.42 $26.82 $26.82 $26.82 $42.27 $49.53 $32.15 $26.82 $26.82 $26,82 $18,48 $18.48 $18,48 -365- CITY OF MOUND Payments. 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 6 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Current Period: January 2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $422.57 Refer 11602 GRAND, DEB Cash Payment Invoice 011502 Transaction Date E 609-49750-331 Travel Expenses 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 REIMBURSE ADAPTERS $14.60 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $14.60 Refer 11602 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 487075 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 487076 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 488732 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 488733 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $140.70 $415.00 $213.11 $906.65 Total $1,675.46 Refer 11602 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals RADIO REPAIR Invoice 51980-A Cash Payment Invoice 51980-B Cash Payment Invoice 113001 Transaction Date E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair RADIO REPAIR E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 11-01 ROOM AND BOARD 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $32.00 $32.00 $582.07 Total $646.07 Refer 11602 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs DATA EXTRACTION Invoice 282 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 $52.57 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $52.57 Refer 11602 HUFNAGLE, TIMOTHY/MELISSA Cash Payment Invoice 011502 Transaction Date R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 REFUND WATER/SEWER Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $75.05 Total $75.05 Refer 11602 IKON OFFICE MACHINES 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 2002 MAINTENANCE Invoice 23094413 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 202 FAX MAINTENANCE Invoice 23093497 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $111.76 $195.00 Total $306.76 Refer 11602 lOS CAPITAL 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying 01009-02 THRU 04-08-02 MAINTENANCE Invoice 53691789 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $99,75 $99.75 Refer 11602 ISLAND PARK SKELL Y 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE Invoice 9416 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $25.86 $25.86 Refer 11602 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 1/16/2002 -366- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 7 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment Invoice 179368 Cash Payment Invoice 179474 Cash Payment Invoice 179475 Cash Payment Invoice 180543 Cash Payment Invoice 1349414 Cash Payment Invoice 1349415 Cash Payment invoice 1349416 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609~49750-251 Liquor For Resale Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 1349417 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 1352285 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 1352286 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale nvoice 181714 ransaction Date 1/16/2002 CREDIT--WINE CREDIT--WINE CREDIT--WINE CREDIT--WINE WINE WINE LIQUOR WINE WINE LIQUOR WINE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 -$126,95 -$2O6.84 -$165,50 -$12,41 $1,712,50 $1,120.80 $836.12 $165,40 $272.30 $1,722,19 -$5,51 Total $5,312.10 Refer 11602 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 02-01 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE 02-01 INTEREST TRUE VALUE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $255.31 $4138O Total $669.I1 Refer 11602 LAKE MINNETONKA CHAMBER CO 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP Invoice 0003290 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $236.00 10100 Total $236.00 Refer 11602 LAKEMINNETONKA CONVERSATI 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 1ST QTR LEVY PAYMENT Invoice 010302 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $4,697.94 Total $4,697.94 Refer 11602 LANO EQUIPMENT, INC©RPORA T 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair #843 REPAIR Invoice 64128 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $392.72 Total $392.72 Refer 1t602 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins ADD EQUIPMENT Invoice 8632 I:ash Payment E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins Invoice 11037090 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 08-27-01 EXCEL ENERGY CLAIM Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $158.00 $1,000.00 Total $1,158.00 -367- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 8 Current Period: January 2002 Refer 11602 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CIITES 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-208 Training and Instruction REGISTRATION OSMEK, DAVID Invoice 011102 Cash Payment E 101-41110-208 Training and Instruction REGISTRATION MEYER, PETER Invoice 010902 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $210.00 $150.00 Total $360.00 Refer 11602 MANAGEMENT MN CITY/CTYASS 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-208 Training and Instruction 02-08-02 REGISTRATION DULUTH Invoice 011602 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $145.00 Total $145.00 Refer 11602 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR 1/16/2002 Cash Payment Invoice 366005 Cash Payment Invoice 368722 Transaction Date E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $2,144.85 $775.40 Total $2,920.25 Refer 11602 METRO MUNICIPALITIES, ASSOCI 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES Invoice 263 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $3,139.00 Total $3,139.00 Refer 11602 METRO WEST INSPECTIONS 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 12-01 BLDG INSPECTIONS Invoice 123101-A Cash Payment E 222-42260-170 Fire Chief-Officer Pay 12-01 FIRE INSPECTIONS Invoice 123101-B Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $5,040.OO $437.50 Total $5,477.50 Refer 11602 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MClS 02-02 WASTEWATER Invoice 0000732396 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 11602 METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY MA 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES Invoice 010702 PO 17157 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $35,342.00 Total $35,342.00 $30.00 Total $30.00 Refer 11602 MINNCOMMPAGING 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 01-02 PAGER SERVICE Invoice 011602 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Refer 11602 MINNESOTA CRIME PREVENTION Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17154 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17154 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17154 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total 1/16/2002 2002 MEMBERSHIP HARRELL 2002 MEMBERSHIP SWANSON 2002 MEMBERSHIP NELSON Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $214.62 $214.62 $30.00 $3O.OO $3O.OO $90.00 -368- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 9 Current Period: January 2002 Refer 11602 MINNESOTA DEPT ECONOMIC SE 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 281.45210-140 Unemployment Comp .4TH QTR UNEMPLOYMENT Invoice 011102 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $312.00 Total $312~ 00 Refer 11602 MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOC 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP Invoice 010202 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $230.00 Total $230.00 Refer 11602 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTFINAN 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41600-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES Invoice 011221 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $40.00 Total $40.00 Refer 11602 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-208 Training and instruction REGISTRATION Invoice 011602 PO 17034 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $195.00 Total $195.00 Refer 11602 MINNESOTA, UNIVERSITY OF Cash Payment Invoice 011602 .ash Payment 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date E 101-41500-331 Travel Expenses E 101-41500-331 Travel Expenses E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous E 101-43100-208 Training and Instruction E 601-49400-208 Training and Instruction E 602-49450-208 Training and Instruction E 609-49750-331 Travel Expenses E 609-49750-331 Travel Expenses E 222-42260-33I Travel Expenses E 101-42400-430 Miscellaneous E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 01-31-02 REGISTRATION ROBERTS 02-07-02 REGISTRATION SCHWALBE 01-31-02 REGISTRATION DEBORD 02-07-02 REGISTRATION HAWKS 01-31-02 REGISTRATION NELSON 01-31-02 REGISTRATION NELSON 01-31-01 REGISTRATION NELSON 01-31-02 REGISTRATION LUEDKE 02-07-02 REGISTRATION GRAND 02-07-02 REGISTRATION WEISE 02-07-02 REGISTRATION NORLANDER 02-07-02 REGISTRATION RAHN Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $48.00 $48.00 $48.00 $48.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $48.00 $48.00 $48.00 $48.00 $48.00 Total $480.00 Refer 11602 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN, INCO ;ash Payment nvoice 011602 Transaction Date E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous PO 17161 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 2002 MEMBERSHIP Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $195.00 Total $195.00 Refer 11602 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO 1/16/2002 -369- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 10 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date Current Period: January 2002 E 895-49990-124 Fire Pension Contributio 12-01 FIRE RELIEF E 895-49990-124 Fire Pension Contributio 01-02 FIRE RELIEF 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8,823.33 $8,823.33 $17,646.66 Refer 11602 MUNICIPALS 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES Invoice 011602 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $20.00 $20.00 Refer 11602 NORLANDER, JILL 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2001 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Invoice 011602 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15.83 $15,83 Refer 11602 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts Invoice 82399681 PO 17035 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts Invoice 82399681 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts Invoice 82399681 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts Invoice 82399681 Transaction Date 1/16/2002 1/16/2002 BLADE ASSEMBLY AMP STARTER AMP STARTER AMP STARTER Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $31.92 $67.45 $67.45 $67.44 $234.26 Refer 11602 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 20284648 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 To~l $66.90 $66.90 Rear 11602 Cash Payment Invoice 793151 Cash Payment Invoice 795359 Cash Payment Invoice 795360 Transaction Date PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, /NC 1/16/2002 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,004.70 $1,818.05 $98.O0 $2,920.75 Refer 11602 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES Invoice 52053 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES Invoice 52224 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $975.00 $573.81 $1,548.81 Rear 11602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment invoice 011602 PROFESSIONAL LA W ENFORCEM 1/16/2002 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DEBORD PO 17155 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP HAWKS PO 17155 $5.00 $5OO -370- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 1 t Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Current Period: January 2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10.00 Refer 11602 Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic Invoice 12681011 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic Invoice 12681011 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic Invoice 12681011 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 PRO TECTION ONE 1/16/2002 01-16-02 THRU 04-15-02 FIRE MONITORING 01-16-02 THRU 04-15-02 FIRE MONITORING 01-16-02 THRU 04-15-02 FIRE MONITORING Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $47.60 $47.60 $47.60 $142.80 Refer 11602 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 069901-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 069952-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 073464-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 075253-00 Cash Payment E 609-497§0-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 075254-00 ash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX ~voice 075256-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 075507-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 077780-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 077807-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 078081-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 078427-00 Transaction Date 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 CREDIT--LIQUOR CREDIT--WINE WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR WINE Marquette Bank Mou -$143.38 -$12.00 $609.51 $132.98 $1,382.09 $914.63 $1,962.71 $61.60 $1,860.71 $127.95 $284.15 10100 Total $7,180.95 Refer 11602 RITTER, BONNIE 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE 2001 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $1.11 Invoice 011602 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1.11 Refer 11602 SHORT ELLIOT'I- HENDRICKSON, I Cash Payment Invoice 0082784 Transaction Date E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 11-01 FIRE FACILITIES STUDY Project FIRE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $2,676.87 Total $2,676.87 Refer 11602 SIGNS OF THE SEASON Cash Payment Invoice 281 ~ash Payment Invoice 281 Cash Payment Invoice 281 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 1/16/2002 PAINT PAINT PAINT $92.66 $92.66 $92.65 -371 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 12 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Current Period: January 2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $277,97 Refer 11602 SPORTING BREED KENNELS Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 02-01 DOG KENNEL FEE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $32500 Total $325.00 Refer 11602 STAR-WESTCHEVROLET/OLDS 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR BATTERY invoice 162217 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $226.00 Total $226.00 Rear 11602 Cash Payment Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E invoice TS012626 Cash Payment E invoice TS012730 Cash Payment E Invoice TS012730 Transaction Date TAHO SPORTSWEAR 1/16/2002 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE ROBERTS E 101-41500-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 13913 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 101-4t 500-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16913 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16914 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms PO 16914 1/17/2002 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE HANSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE SMITH CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE SCHWALBE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE NELSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE NELSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE NELSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE RAHN CLOTHING ALLOWANCE DEBORD Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $33.52 $28.72 $28.72 $27.50 $46.32 $7.67 $7.67 $7.66 $52.72 $33,72 $33,72 $307,94 Refer 11602 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment Invoice 212320 Cash Payment Invoice 249177 Cash Payment Invoice 249178 Cash Payment Invoice 249884 Cash Payment Invoice 249885 Cash Payment Invoice 250476 Transaction Date E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 CREDIT--BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total -$5000 $25.10 $4,960.95 $196.10 $2,646.35 $1,737.40 $9,515.90 Refer 11602 THURK BROTHERS CHEVROLET 1/16/2002 -372- CITY OF MOUND Payments Ol/17/02 2:12 PM Page 13 Cash Payment Invoice 45514 Transaction Date Current Period: January 2002 E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts NUTS AND BOLTS 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $8.48 10100 Total $8.48 Refer 11602 THYSSENLAGERQUISTELEVATO 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-02 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE Invoice 302281 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $15860 Total $158.60 Refer 11602 TMB CONSULTING 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract INTERNET REPAIR Invoice 05-172 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $112.50 Total $112.50 Rear 11602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment 011602 Payment Invoice 011602 Transaction Date TRAINING OF OFFICERS, ASSOCI 1/16/2002 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17153 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17153 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17153 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17153 E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions PO 17153 1/16/2002 2002 MEMBERSHIP HARRELL 2002 MEMBERSHIP MCKINLEY 2002 MEMBERSHIP TRAUX 2002 MEMBERSHIP NICCUM 2002 MEMBERSHIP BURKE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $25.00 $25.OO $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $125.00 Refer 11602 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITE Cash Payment Invoice 5 Transaction Date E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 12-01 LIQUOR STORE BOND Project LIQUOR Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,901.40 $1,901.40 Refer 11602 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies invoice 328925-0 [;ash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328925-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328426-0 1/16/2002 MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES ENVELOPE, FILE, ETC $12.94 $12.94 $12.94 $12.94 $12.94 $4.31 $4.31 $6.47 $6.45 $105.67 -373- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 14 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327506-2 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327941-0 PO 17209 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327940-0 PO 17149 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328095-0 PO 17149 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328316-0 MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MiSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE APPOINTMENT BOOKS NOTEBOOKS, ETC SHEARS MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MiSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Cash Payment E 101-41310-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CHAIR, RAHN Invoice 328340-0 PO 16915 Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CHAIR, NELSON Invoice 328340-0 PO 16915 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CHAIR, NELSON Invoice 328340-0 PO 16915 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CHAIR, NELSON Invoice 328340-0 PO 16915 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 $2.37 $2.37 $2.37 $2.37 $2.37 $0.79 $0.79 $1.19 $1.21 $93.66 $19.07 $31.26 $10.12 $297.14 $99.04 $99.O4 $99.05 $1.01 $1.01 $1,01 $1.01 $1.01 $0.34 $0.34 $0.51 -374- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 15 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies invoice 328151-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 328251-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies 327017-0 Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 327017-0 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES DISKS CALENDARS CALENDARS CALENDARS FLOOR MAT MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES IVlISCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MlSCELLAENOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES APPOINTMENT BOOK APPOINTMENT BOOK APPOINTMENT BOOK Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $0.51 $57.48 $11.63 $11.63 $11.63 $135.84 $1503 $15.O3 $15.03 $15.03 $15.03 $5.01 $5.01 $7.52 $7.52 $10.30 $33.02 $10.12 Total $1,344.73 Refer 11602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 Payment Invoice 011602 Cash Payment Invoice 011602 UNITED PROPERTIES 1/16/2002 E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-02 BALBOA PARKING E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-02 BALBOA PARKING E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-02 BALBOA PARKING E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-02 BALBOA PARKING E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-02 BALBOA PARKING E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-02 BALBOA PARKING $31 95 $31,95 $31.95 $31.95 $31,95 $31,95 -375- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:12 PM Page 16 Current Period: January 2002 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $191.70 Refer 11602 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone 12-01 296-9058 FINANCE $8.33 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone 12-01 554-6520 ON CALL PAGER $3.68 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone 12-01 554-6520 ON CALL PAGER $3,67 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone 12-01 590-4351 PAN' SKINNER $6.92 invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone 12-01 590-4351 PAN SKINNER $6.92 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone 12-01 590-4351 P/VV SKINNER $6.91 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 12-01 MOUND FIRE $1.88 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 12-01 ENGINE #18 $1.40 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 12-01 MOUND FIRE $1.56 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 12-01 RESCUE TRUCK $8.33 Invoice 123101 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 12-01 750-2666 PEDERSON $28.35 Invoice 123101 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $77.95 Refer 11602 WHITE BEAR LAKE POLICE DEPA 1/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Training and Instruction 02-11-02 COMPLAINT SEMINAR MCKINLEY $595.00 Invoice 011602 PO 17163 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $595.00 Refer 11602 WILLIAMS TOWING 1/16/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program CASE #01-890 TOW Invoice 010402 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 $101.18 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $101.18 Refer 11602 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B 1/16/2002 12-01 #2245-301-939 $869.67 12-01 #0466-607-223 $21.99 12-01 #1914-601-425 $370.36 12-01 #0217-606-329 $3,241,43 12-01 #2184-407-147 $454.47 12-01 #0047-005-229 $194.23 12-01 #0864-508-832 $126.14 -376- CiTY OF MOUND Payments 01/17/02 2:41 PM Page i7 Current Period: January 2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 123101-B Transaction Date 1/17/2002 12-01 #0864-508-832 12-01 #0864-508-832 12-01 #0018-802-634 12-01 #0009-604-835 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $126.14 $126.15 $1,545.32 $323.04 Total $7,398.94 Refer 11602 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 57927389 Transaction Date 1/17/2002 1/16/2002 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $897.06 Total $897.06 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TiF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $29,571.02 $2,936.47 $312.00 $9,323.27 $4,030.95 $4,364.77 $39,388.85 $46,686.70 $195.00 $17,646.66 $154,455.69 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $154,455.69 $154,455.69 01-02-02 : $ 4,594.44 01-04-02 : $ 357.80 01-08-02 : $ 32,129.96 01-09-02 = $ 64,869.89 01-11-02 = $ 15.00 01-16-02 = $154,455.69 $256,422.78 TOTAL -377- C~ OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON WESTEDGE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., for construction of approximately 1,600 LF of 10" D. I, P. Watermain, together with riflings, valves and related appurtenances; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to direct the City Clerk to prepare and cause to be inserted in The Laker and in the Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such plans and specifications. The advertisement shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 at which time they will be publicly opened at City hall by the City Clerk and City Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the City Council at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 26, 2002. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and a~mpanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check in an amount not less than five (5) percent of the total amount of bid. No bid may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after the bids are opened. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative; Adopted by the City Council this day of 2002. Attest: Bonnie Rifler, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -378- GITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WESTEDGE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, on April 24, 2001, the City Council did, by Resolution No. 01-35, order the improvement of Westedge Boulevard and certain retaining walls throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2001, the City Council did, by Resolution No. 01-36, approve the plans and specifications prepared by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., for the proposed improvement of Westedge Boulevard and certain retaining walls throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2001, the City Council did, by Resolution No. 01-37, order advertisement for bids for the improvement of Westedge Boulevard; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2001, the City Council did, by Resolution No. 01-56, reject the bid received for the Westedge Boulevard Improvement Project; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in The Laker and in the Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published no less than three weeks before the last day for submission of bids, and shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 at which time they will be publicly opened at City Hall by the City Clerk and City Engineer, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the City Council at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 26, 2002. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check in an amount of not les than five (5) percent of the total amount of bid. No bid may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after the bids are opened. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this day of Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -379- CI~ OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OF CSAH 15, FROM CYPRESS LANE TO APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET WEST OF CSAH 110, PLUS RELATED IMPROVEMENT OF CSAH 110, NORTH AND SOUTH OF CSAH 15 AND CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO THE METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MOUND VISIONS 2ND) 2002'' WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve CSAH 15, from Cypress Lane west across CSAH 110, to include the new entrance to Mound Marketplace, plus related improvement of CSAH 110, north and south of CSAH 15; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to make Public Infrastructure Improvements in Mound Visions 2nd Addition, including sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, sidewalks/trails, and park amenities; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to make Public Infrastructure Improvements within the public right-of- way of Mound Visions 2r~ Addition, including CSAH 15 streetscape, Commerce Boulevard streetscape, and CSAH 15 turn lane; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the said improvements, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: That the proposed improvements referred to John Cameron of McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and asto whether it should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this day of Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -380- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION RELATING TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING WHEREAS, the Tax Increment Law as amended in 2001 authorizes interfund advances or loans to be repaid from tax increments, but requires that they first be approved by resolution of the governing body before money is transferred, advanced or spent, and that the terms and conditions for repayment be provided in writing and include, at a minimum, the principal amount, the interest rate, and maximum term; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City') and the Mound HRA ("the Authority") are beginning to incur expenditures for the TIF Districts created by the Authority/City for the Mound Downtown Area, TIF District 1-1 and 1-2. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: Interfund Loan. An interfund loan (the "Loan") shall be made from the City's General Fund to the Tax Increment funds for the purpose of cash flow with respect to the TIF Districts. The Loan shall be repaid from tax increments or from the proceeds of tax increment bonds; provided that later proceedings may provide a priority of payment for the Loan if it is repaid directly from tax increments. Terms. The Loan shall be in the amount of $5,000,000. The Loan shall bear interest at the rate of 6%. The Loan shall have a maximum term of 10 years, unless such term shall be extended by later resolution; provided that later proceedings when other uses of tax increments are known may provide more specific payment or prepayment timing for the principal of the Loan and interest thereon. 3. Note The Loan shall not be evidenced by any note or writing other than this resolution. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this day of 2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -381 - New legal requirements for interfund loans to TIF districts by William E. Connors, Director Tax I~wrement Finandng Division, Office of the State Auditor During the 2001 session, the Legisla- ture addressed the issue of interfund loans to TIF districts and enacted new provisions that will better allow TIF authorities to manage the financing of TIF projects. Prior to the 2001 anaenchnents, the only financing mechanism explicitly authorized by the TIF Act for TIF projects was the issuance of bonds. The 2001 onufibus tax act amended the TIF Act's defini- tion of"bonds" to include inteffund loans. The 2001 legislation established a process that a TIF authority mus~ follow in malcing an interfund loan. The TIF authority or municipality that controls the fund making the interfund loan must approve it by resolution before the money is trans- ferred, advanced, or spent. The terms and conditions for repayment of the interfund loan must be set forth in writing and include at least the principal amount, the interest rate, and the maximum term of the loan. Finally, the rate of interest that may be charged on an interfund loan is limited to the greater of the rates specified in Minn. Stat. [§ 270.75 or 549.09.The 2001 provisions are effective for interfund loans made after July 31', 2001, and to TIF districts with certification request dates a~er July 31,1979. Inteffund loans made before Aug. 1, 2001, are ratified, which should alleviate any concerns of local govern- ments that may have used interfund loans to fimuace TIF Projects before this thaae. However, the new law requires that any interest accrued or paid after July 31, 2001, on a preexist- lng interfund loan is subject to the linaitations discussed above. This ratifcafion applies to local govern- ments which have preexisting interfund loans that were implicitly created when a TIF district's fund experienced a negative cash balance. In such cases, the local government must act to determine the principal amount of such "loans" so that an appropriate interest rate may be determined. In these cases, the principal anaount of a negative-cash- balance interfund loan is limited to the larges~ negative cash balance that existed at any time in the fund that received 'the undocumented loan. In the past, some local govern- ments may have relied upon their auditors to eliminate negative cash balances in their TIF districts' funds by reclassifying them as interfund payables. To comply with the new law requiring £rior approval of intenCund loans to TIF districts, each TIF authority should consider adopting policies and procedures that will assist the authority in complying ~th state law. One approach would be. to adopt a policy by resolution' when ~ TIF district is created stating that ~fan interfund loan is needed, an auto-. matic, pre-apProved loan would be made. This resolution would specify maximum principal amount~ maxi- mum term, and the applicable interest rate. Another approach would be to direct the individuals responsible for maintaining TIF financial records to monitor cash balances in eaCl~ ~ TIF fund throughout the year. seek a resolution fi:om the governing board if an inteffund loan b~Comes necessary. Additional monitoring of TIF funds, in general, will be of even greater importance than in the past in order to comply with tlfis hew taw. The new interfund loan?rovi- sions can be found at Laws ~ Sp. 2001 ch. 5, art. 15, ~ec. 3 and 21.Additional information for accountants On negative cash balances and int~rfund loans can be found in the AICPA's Audit and Accountin£ Guide:Audits of State and Local Governmental Units ¶ 7.07 (1994) and the Government Accounting Standards. Board's Codifi- cation of Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards ~ 1300.110 (~une 30, 2000). ~- -382- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT (#A14569) WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY REGARDING ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED DATA BASE (EPDB) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Hennepin County has developed a proprietary geographical digitized data base (EPDB); and WHEREAS, the City of Mound desires to use the County's EPDB in the course of conducting the City's business; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved the license agreement on April 13, 1999, by Resolution #99-31; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved the extension of this agreement through December 31, 2001, by Resolution #00-91; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is now asking that we extend the EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement through December 31, 2002; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the extension of Hennepin County's EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement (#14569) through December 31, 2002. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this day of 2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -383- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION AMENDING THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF THE CITY OF MOUND BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby amend the following section of the City of Mound Administrative Code which covers all non-union personnel, as follows: SECTION 14 - INSURANCE 14.1 Change amounts the Employer agrees to contribute up to the amounts set forth below toward the cost of family coverage as follows: 2002 2003 Medica $585.00 $610.00 14.5 Add section 14.5 to read as follows: The Employer agrees to pay the full premium for a Long Term Disability Policy (as enhanced on Februa~ 1, 2002) for each full-time employee, after 30 days of continuous employment. The quali~ing period for the LTD shall be 90 days. Employees shall not earn more while on LTD than they would receive as base pay if they were in a work status. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this day of ,2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -384- Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To; From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council c ~a~li~ Sarah Smid% Community Development Dire 1/17/2002 Notice of Wetlands Conversation Act Decision - Request for Extension Regarding No Net Loss Determinafon and/or Exemption for Lots 5-8, Block 4, Harrison Shores Development 0Becket) Sttrnmary. Tim Becker (on behalf of Nmself and Dale and Lorell Becket) has submitted a written request for an extension regarding the City's decision for a "no net loss" determination and/or exemption pursuant to tine 1991 Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA) for fine property legally described as Lots 5-8, Block 4, Harrison Shores. As tine City Council may be aware, .tine current extension previously granted by fine Beckets expires on January 24, 2002. According to tine attached letter dated January 15, 2002, the applicants are requesting and hereby agreeing to an additional extension until July 23, 2002 regarding fine City's decision on this matter. Supporting Information, For your review and consideration, fine following information lnas been included: · Letter from Tim Becker dated January 15, 2002 · Letter to Tim Becket dated janu 8, 2002 · Letter to Tim Becker dated August 16, 2001 · August 14, 2001 City Council agenda and meeting minute excerpts · Letter from Tim Becket dated July 31, 2001 · Excerpts from May 22, 2001 City Council meeting minutes · Letter from Tim Becket dated May 16, 2001 · Excerpts from February 27, 2001 City Council meeting minutes · Staff Report dated Februar3, 13, 2001 Recommendation. City staff recommends that fine Ciw Ctmncil approve the request from Tim Becket to extend fine timeframe for the City's decision regarding fine "no net loss" determination and/or exemption until July 23, 2002. ; -385- January l5,2002 Kmadis Hanson Mound City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Application for No-loss determination Dear Ms. Hanson: This letter is to confirm a conversation with Loren Gordon on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, wherein it was agreed by me and on behalf of Dale mad Lorell Becker that we would agree to a further ex'tension of the time within which the City Council is to render a decision on the above referenced matter. By this letter we are consenting to an extension for this period extending to July 23, 2002. Sincerely, Tim Becker cc: Ms. Sarah Smith Stuart Gale -386- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 CITY OF MOUND PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEEB: www. cityofmound.¢om January g, 2002 - copy- Mr. Tim Becker 6919 North Shore Drive Eau Claire, WI 54703 Request for Extension of City Decision - Wetland Conservation Act No Net Loss Determination and Exemption for Lots 5-8, I-Ia~:rison Shores Dear Mr. Becket: This letter is in regard to the property owned by you and your family that is legally described as Lots 5-8, Harrison Shores. As you are aware, at its August 14, 2001 meeting, the Mound City Council approved your written request' for an extension until January 24, 2002 regarding the City's decision for a "no net loss" wetland determination and/or exemption that is associated with your property. In the event that you wish to request formal action from the City Council regarding the no-net loss determination and/or exemption or wish to request another extension, it is respectfully requested that submit your written request no later than Tuesday, January 15, 2002. On behalf of the City of Mound, I wish to inform you that the next City Council meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 22, 2002. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience at (952) 472,3190. I look. forward to working with you a~; you proceed with your proposed development plans. Community DeveloPment Director printed on recycled paper -387- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MA.'YWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: wvvw. cityofmound.com August 16, 2001 FYg Mr. Tim Backer 6919 North Shore Drive Eau Claire, WI 54703 Approval of Request for Extension of City Decision - Wetland Conservation Act No Net Loss Determination and Exemption for Lots 5-8, ltarrison Shores Dear Mr. Backer: This letter is in regard to the property owned by you and your family which is legally described as Lots 5-8, Harrison Shores. On behalf of the City of Mound, I wish to inform you that at its August 14, 2001 meeting, the City Council approved your written request for an extension until January 24, 2002 regarding the City's decision for a "no net loss" wetland determination and/or exemption that is associated with your property. If you have any questions or would like to request a copy of the meeting minutes, please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to working with you as you proceed with your proposed development plans. Community Development Director prlnted on recycled paper -388- ~,,~ MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES , AUGUST 14, 2.001 The City Council of the City of Mound,' Hennepi.n County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, August 14, 2001, at 7:30 p.m, in the council' chambers at 5341 Maywood Read i,n said City. Councilme.mbers Present: Mayor Meisel, Counciimembers Bob Brown, Mark Ha.us, Kim Andersen and Peter Meyer. Others Presen{: City Attorney, John Dean; Ci[y Manager, Kandis Hanson; Acting Ci~ Clerk, Bonnie Ritter; Community Development Director, Sarah S, mi~th; City Planner, Loren Gordon, Lor~ie Ham, Bill. and Dorothy Netk, a, John Dennis Hopkins, Jim Smith. Consent.. Agenda: A,I/ items listed uriC/er the Ce. sent routine in nafure by the Council and wi//be separate discussion an t~hese items un/ess a which, event ~he'item will be removed from ~he normal sequence. tO be There vcill be no so requests, in ,and considered in 1. OPEN MEETING AND .PLEDG.E Mayer Meisel called the meeting te. er~ier re~ited. of Allegiance was 5 City ~Manager, Kandis seeing a speQiai meeting for ~he budget workshop. , .... .~ MOTi:QN by Ha nd~~ agenda as n te apl~rove the amended. /~1t. voted i-r~ faveF. Motion ~.~{ed. '~ 3. CO~~ M.e~ ~~m~vaf ef Minutes, an~l item. G, Pubti¢ La.ds Pem'~i't from the ce.r~sen{, ageRda for discu, ssie.. MOTION by Ha.us, seBer~de~l' bF Meyer to al3pmve {he eer~'sen[~ agenda as amended. All. ~et. ed i:n, favor. Mefier~ taxied. B. AppCeve Payment ef Claims in the Ameur~t. of $298,,5~6~. C. RESOLUTION NO, 0.1~64: RESOLUTION NAMING ,DON SCHERVEN MEMORIAL PARK. Approve Tim Booker Refluest for E~te.ns,ien to '"NO.Net Loss" Determination and Exemption. 1 -RR~7- -389- ~5:39 715~325004 UWSTOUT PAGE 82 .l'uly 31, 2001 Kandis Hanson Mound City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN ~5364 Re: Application for No-loss determination Dear Ms. Hanson: This letter is tn confirm a conversation with Loren Gordon and yom-sel£ on Tuesday, July 31,2001, wherein it was agreed by me and on behalf of Dale and Lorell B ecker that we would agree to a further extension oft. he time within which the City Council is to render a decision on the above referenced matter. We are in the process of completing our development plans.and will be meeting with. the City for permit approvals in the near future. It is our intent to use our lots in the same manner approved by the City of Mound when the comprehensive plan established our lots and zoned them as R-1 for single family homes. We wiIl work with the City Planner and Community Development Director to determine if we should keep the K-1 zoning or rezone the lots for R-IA. The City of Mound established the R-IA.zoning for single family homes on substandard lots. Either option should allow us to construct homes comparable to those in our neighborhood. By this letter we are consenting to an extension of time extending to January 24, 2002. We look forward to working with you and having Mound City staffguide us through the permitting process. Sincerely, Tim Becket CC: Dale and Lorell Becket -390- The City Council of the City of Mound, Henn p' , ' g · session onTuesday, May. 22, 2001 at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers at 5341 ( .Maywood Road, in said City. Counciimembers PreSent: Mayor Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus,. Klm Anderson and Peter Meyer. Others PreSent: City Attorney, John Dean; City Manager, Kandis Hanson; Acting City Clerk, Bonnie-Ritter; City Engineer, john Cameron; City Planners Loren Gordon and Bruce Chamberlain; Parks Director, Jim Fackler; Bob Lindahl;' Mike Conlan of Gramercy; Steve McDonald; Bill and Dorothy Netkai Ken Berres, Bob Polston, Lorde Ham, Jo Longpre, Bruce and Patti Dodds, Rhonda Eurich, Christine Valerius, Mike Mueller, Phil lansing, Paula Larson, Sally Custer, Sharon & Phil Baumel, Jackie and Wayne Davis, Lisa martin, John Babler, Dale and Becky Simon, Karl Weisenborn, Byron and Gloria Petersen, Keith Brown, Rick and Susan BloomqUist, Jeff Hanratty, Robed and Elsie Beadle, Peter Johnson, Michael Gardner, Susan Gardner, Carol Lindgren. Consent Agenda: A// items /isted under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and wi//be enacted by a roi~ ca//vote. There wi//be no separate discussion on these items un/ess a Counci/member or citizen so requests, in which' event the item wi//be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in norma/ sequence.. 1, OPEN MEETING AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 2. APPROVE AGENDA City Manager Kandis Hanson requested that item 5 be removed from the agenda at the request of the applicant, and that item 5a, MetroPlains Cell Tower, be added. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the agenda as amended. All voted f~;;;~onded by ~nderson to appro~e the Consent agenda. All voted Mound City Council Minutes - May 22, 2001 (2) Fire (3) City (4) Department City Employee Recognition Event Temporary On-Sale 3.2 Beer Temporary one-day Set-ups Days Permits Carnival, Craft Show & Concessions, Fireworks, Public Gathering, Parade, Dance, On-Sale 3.2 Beer (for dance at Pond Arena & music at Mound Bay Park), Set-ups, Live Musical Concert. Liquor License Renewals Club On-Sale: VFW Post 5113 and .An )erican Legion Sunday Sales: VFW Post 5113 and American Legion On-Sale Wine: Al & Alma's Supper Club and House of Moy 3.2 Beer On-Sale: Al & Alma's and House of Moy Off-Sale 3.2 Beer: .By the Way Snack Shop, Mainstreet Market, PDQ Food Store, and SuperAmerica D. Planning Commission. Recommendations: RESOLUTION NO. 01-45: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SIDEYARD SETBACK FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4711 CUMBERLAND ROAD, P & Z CASE #01-14. o RESOLUTION NO. 01..46:'RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A STREET SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 'AT 4525 DENBIGH ROAD, P & Z CASE #01-15. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 01-47: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A HARDCOVER VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4. 'COMMENTS FROM' ClTiZENS~ · Residents from Langdon Lane addressed the Council regarding sewer back-up that occurred on April 24. After discussion it was decided that after input is received from the adjusters, the Council, Metro Waste Commission and residents sit down and resolve thls issue. !ia. METROPLAINS CELL TOWER Loren Gordon informed the Council that Qwest and MetroPlains have agreed on a location for the cell tower. One of the issues with this location is the setback from the property line of parcel 11, which would need to be addCessed through the variance process. MetroPlains has indicated that they will be submitted a variance application. 2 -392- SIT UW STOUT-MEN WI 819524720620 N0.965 [~02 Re: Applicalio~ tot No.-io~s dcccrmir~on Dear Ms, Plauson: Thw l~ter is to cottfirm a convc _~tion with Lorcn Oordon on Wed May 16, 200l, wherein it was ~ by mc and on behalf of Dale and l.~rcll Becket that wc would agre~ to a furtb:r cx't~sion By this letter w~ are co _ms-'~i_*ng to an cxtcnsion for this period b~'nnlng May 22, 2001 and cxct~nding to August 24, 2001. Sinoer¢ly, Tun BecKet -393- Mound City Council Minutes - February 27, 2001. 16. WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT NO-LOSS REQUEST (BECKER). ~City Attorney Dean reviewed the last action of the Council, being the suggestion that the Becker reps and City reps get together to see if a compromise could be reached. Since that meeting, extensive discussions along those lines have resulted. There is a strong potential that a resolution can be reached, but there is nothing in writing for consideration tonight. Dean continued by stating th. at the joint recommendation is that the matter be continued to 90 days (May 22na Council meeting),and between now and then all unresolved issues will be resolved.. He.added.that the Beckers provided another waiver of the 60-day rule, and that the City can automatically extend 60 days without further notice, and after that date can extend with mutual consent, to any date in the future. -394- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (9,52) 472-1:)600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cltyofmound.com STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: CASE NO.: LOCATION: City Council Agenda of February 13, 2001 City Council, Applicant, and Staff n Sutherland, Building Official Kelly Bopray, 1VIFRA, LPSS, John M. LeFevre, Kennedy & Graven Requests from Peterson Environmental for the City Council to review the Staff Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) No Loss and Exemption Decisions Peterson Environmental/CO The Beckers 1355 Mendota Heights Road, Suite 100 Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120-1112 01-09 Lots 5-8, Block 4 of Harrison Shores Development Back2round The current requests under the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) on behalf of the Beckers were made August 8, 2000, by Peterson Environmental. The requests were for either: (a) "no-loss" determination; or, (b) exemption under the WCA. The effect of granting the request would be to allow Beckers to develop their property without the need to comply with the WCA requirements to accurately delineate the location of wetland and show that wetland impacts would not occur or to provide for replacement of any wetland impacted by development. The August 8 request was accompanied by a detailed report by Peterson Environmental. Peterson's argument was that jurisdictional wetlands were not involved because the Becker property had been substantially disturbed and filled by previous development in the area dating 'back to 1961, and that there were not clear indications of wetland. When technical wetland issues are involved in an application to the City, the City may convene the T~ohnioal Evaluation Panel (TEP) to consider such issues and make recommendations to the City. In considering this request, the City convened the TE~ panel, consisting of Doug Snyd~ of BWSR, Dave Thill of HCD and Jon Sutherland of the City. The TEP panel haS visited the site several times in recent years. The TEP panel met with ?eterson and considered the Peterson submissions and held discussions with its consultant, Kelly Bopray of ~ Ice Yanta Of Corps of Engineer% Wayne Barsted oflVlnD~ and other staff members of BWS1L At, er deliberations, the TEP issued its recommendation on October 10, 2000, which was to deny the request for a no- loss determination or exemption. Aider ?eterson asked the T~P to reconsider its October 10 report, the TEP on October 23, 2000, issued a clarification letter, explaining that if additional relevant information was submitted, the issue might be reconsidered by the TEP. Copies of TEP reports are attached. On November 7, 2000, City staff issued its Notice of WCA Decision, accepting the TEP recommendation to deny the requests for no-loss determination or exemption (copy attached). When Beckers requested an opportunity to make a presentation to City Council, City staff agreed to withdraw its Notice of Decision so that the matter could be considered by the CounCil. A copy of a letter from John lvl. LeFevre, Jr., to Ron Peterson dated November 22, 2000, along with Peterson's responses dated December 5 and December 12, 2000, and John Dean's letter to Peterson (counter signed), dated January 1 $~, 2000, are attached. On behalf ofBeckers, Peterson submitted to the Council members its letter of December 21, 2000, outlining its points in objecting to the TEP recommendations and in arguing in favor of a no- loss determination or exemption under the WCA. No-Loss Determination. In order to show they are entitled to a no-loss determination under the WCA, Beckers must show that the work they propose will not drain or fill a wetland. WCA Rules 8420.0220. Beckers contend that the development of their property will not affect a wetland because their property does not contain a wetland under applicable definitions. Exemption Reques.t. In order to show they are entitled to the requested WCA exemption, Beckers must show that although wetland is present on the property, it was created solely as a result of actions by public or private entities that were taken for a purpose other than creating the wetland. WCA Rules 8420.0122, subp. 5. The TEP recommendations, and the propos~ staff decisions, were that Beckers had not met these requirements 'for either a no-loss determination or an exemption. Based on the documentation reviewed by the TEP, the TEP panel concluded that wetland existed on the site, but that Beckers had not adequately demonstrated the extent of the wetland or the extent of the proposed project. These conclusions are set forth in the November 7, 2000 Notice of Decision with attachments. Previous Action by City_ Council. The wetland issues on the Becket property have been before the Council before. During 1998, Beckers applied for a permit to fill and grade their property for purposes of development. The permit was denied by City staff, aier consideration by the TEP panel, on grounds that wetlands existed on the property which had not been adequately delineated. When Beckers appealed the staff decision to the Council, the Council appointed an independent heating officer to hear the evidence and make recommendations to the Council. The 2 -' -396- hearing officer, in detailed recommendations, found that wetlands were present on the site which had not been properly delineated. The Council adopted the findings and affirmed the staff permit denial, but offered the opportunity to Beckers to continue to monitor' water levels on the property and to submit additional data or a revised wetland delineation to the TEP if appropriate. The TEP met with Beaker's former consultant (BARR Engineering) in the summer of 1999, agreed on a revised wetland boundary, however, the surveyed wetland boundary was never provided to the City or TEP. Format. The format for consideration of these issues will be as follows: a. John M. LeFewe ofKennedy & Graven will introduce the issues and summarize the background; b. Ron Peterson of Peterson Environmental will lead the presentation for the Beckets; c. City staff and consultant, Kelly Bopray, will explain the basis for the TEP reports; d. Council will decide how it wishes to proceed. It may, for example, request proposed findings from both sides; and, e. Council will consider final decision at its meeting on February 27, 2001. Options for Council to Consider: 1. Affirm staff determinations, based on TEP recommendations, to deny requests for a no-loss determination and exemption. 2. Reverse staff determinations and grant requests for either a no-loss determination, or exemption, or both. 3 -397- COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 1/8/02 Draft THIS AGREEMENT is made this __ day of ,2002 ~y and between, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ('Mound") and the Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation, a Minnesota non-profit corporation CWestonka") BACKGROUND The Gillespie Senior Center is owned and operated by Westonka, and is operated on a not-for-profit basis as a clubhouse, meeting and recreational facility serving senior citizens in communities generally located in the western Lake Minnetonka area. The work of the Center is recognized by communities in the area, and a number of then have made financial contributions to assist the Center in its operations. Mound recognizes the activities of Center to be a key and important part of public recreation for the citizens of the community. Mound has previously made a significant contribution by approving an exemption from property taxation for the Center. Due to continuing umnet financial needs, the Westonka has requested that Mound consider additional assistance. Because of severe budget constraints, Mound was unable to provide for a monetary contribution to the Center in its 2002 budget. Mound is authorized by law to operate programs of public recreation, and to equip and maintain land, buildings and other recreational facilities to carry out such programs. Mound is further authorized by law to enter into agreements with non-profit organizations as such parties may mutually agree to provide for such programs. AGREEMENT In light of the foregoing, the parties hereto do stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Consideration. The consideration if the mutual promises and undertakings hereinafter made which the parties each deem to be adequate consideration. 2. Westonka Services to Continue. During the term of this Agreement, Westonka agrees to continue to provide clubhouse, meeting and recreational facilities serving primarily senior citizens in the western Lake Minnetonka area, including Mound. 3. Services Provided to Westonka. During the term of this Agreement, Mound will provide the following services to the Center. Parking lot sweeping. -398- Mowing, limited to one (1) time per week; no bagging or sweeping. Secure broken windows and other openings, not due to storm damage. Respond to water and sewer emergencies. Snow plowing from parking areas and walkways, suited to removal by motorized vehicles. Snow hauling, when needed. Sanding of parking areas. 4. Additional Westonka Consideration. In addition to the consideration comained in paragraph 1 above, Westonka agrees during the term of this Agreement to do the following: · Provide a meeting room at the Center for use by Mound at no charge for one six-hour period per month. (Mound to be responsible for the set-up and take-down of the room before and after the meeting) · Sponsor a dinner for the Mound crews providing the services · Make coffee and restroom facilities available to Mound crews while working at the Center. · Provide personnel to assist in Mound mass mailings and newsletters. 5. Scheduling and Requesting Services. As soon as possible after the execution of this Agreement, designated representatives of the parties will meet and formulate a schedule for performance of the services described in section 3 above, and the process for requesting them. As to services that cannot be scheduled, in advance, for specific times, such as snow removal and other emergency services, the parties will formulate a response time schedule that will address, for example, the type of weather event that will trigger snow plowing, and the timing for providing the service in the case of such a weather event. Until a schedule has been formulated for each service, Mound may, but is not required, to provide such service. 6. Liability and Indemnity. Mound indemnifies, and agrees to defend and save harmless, Westonka, its officers agents and employees from any claim or cause of action for injury to persons or property occasioned by or arising out of the negligence or willful or wanton misconduct of Mound, its officers agents or employees, in the performance of its obligations under this agreement. Mounds liability to Westonka under this Agreement is limited to this section and section 7. 7. Consequential Damages. Mound shall be liable to Westonka for any loss in rental income, or from claims from individuals scheduled to use Center facilities ("Third Party Claims"), resulting from the failure of Mound to perform any service as provided for in the schedule for that service, but only to the extent that Mound's failure is due to the negligence or willful or wanton misconduct of Mound in performance according to the schedule. Failures to comply with the schedule that are not due to such conduct by Mound, or which are due to circumstances beyond Mound's control will not be the basis for claims under this section, and with respect to Third Party Claims, Westonka hereby indemnifies and holds harmless Mound and its officers agents and employees. 8. Term, Termination. The term of this Agreement shall be for one year from the date of execution, and will automatically extend for successive one year periods unless either party notifies the other party in writing, within 30 days of the termination date that it elects not to extend the Agreement. -399- 9. Termination During Term. Either party may terminate this Agreement during its initial term or any extension thereof. Such termination may be for cause, or for no cause. If the termination is for failure of the other party to perform, the terminating party may, at its election, make the termination effective upon the giving of written notice of such to the other party. If the termination is by Mound, and is not due to a breach by Westonka, the termination shall not be effective until Westonka has had a reasonable opportunity to obtain an alternate source for the services, or until 60 days following written notice of termination, whichever comes first. 10. Addition or Removal of Services. The parties may, from time to time, agree to add or remove services from the schedule of services described in Section 3 above. The Center will be subject to incremental charges for services in any subsequent agreements. 11. Miscellaneous. The provisions of this agreement are intended to be binding on and inure to the benefit of parties hereto and their successors and assigns. This agreement is not intended, and shall not be construed to confer any right or cause of action on third parties not signatory hereto. Written notices required under this agreement will be either hand delivered or mailed by registered mail at the following addresses: In the case of notices to Mound: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Attn: Kandis M. Hanson In the case of notices to Westonka: Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation [Insert Address and designated recipient] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUND By: By: Pat Meisel, Mayor Kandis Hanson, City Manager WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZEN FOUNDATION By: Its: -400- ACORD., CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE ]./9/2002 WISER INSURANCE AGENCY P.O. BOX 427 45 COMMERCE BLVD. D~D, MN 55364 52)472-3660 INSURED Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation 2590 Commerce Blvd Mound, MN 55364 THIS CE~¥iFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MAI-I'ER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY Highlands Insurance Group A COMPANY B COMPANY C COMPANY D COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DDfYY) DATE (MM/DDrYY) LIMITS GENERAL UABIUTY BODILY INJURY OCC $ I r 000 ~ 000 A. ~ COMPREHENSIVE FORM ';--CA3033592 00 6/15/2001 6/[5/2002 BODILY INJURYAGG $ 2,000,000 PREMISES/OPERATIONS PROPERTY DAMAGE OCC $1 f 000 r 000 UNDERGROUND EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE HAZARD PROPERTY DAMAGE AGG $ 2 t 000 ,. 000 PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPER BI& PD COMBINED OCC $1 f 000 / 000 __ CONTRACTUAL BI & PD COMBINED AGG $ 2 ,. 000,000 __ INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS PERSONAL INJURYAGG $ i r 000 ~ 000 BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE PERSONAL INJURY AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY -- BODILY INJURY __ ANY AUTO (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS (Private Pass) ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY __ (Other than Private Passenger) (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY BODILY INJURY & PROPERTY DAMAGE $ COMBINED EXCESS MABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ UMBRELLA FORM AGGREGATE $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND I WC STATU- TORY UMITS I tOTH' EMPLOYERS' UABILJTYt ER EL EACH ACCIDENT THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ OFFICERS ARE: EXCL EL DISEASE- EA EMPLOYEE $ OTHER ~E$C.,RIPTION OF OP~KATIONSILOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS City of Mound added as additional insured :)LDER CANCFLLATION City of Mound 5341 Malrwood Road Mound MN 55364 ACORD 25-N (t/95) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATIONDATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, iTS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. -401 - © ACORD CORPORATION 1988 H A R TERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://www, kennedy-graven.com MARY D. TIETJEN Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9277 Email: mtietj en~kennedy-graven.com November 6, 2001 Len Harrell Chief of Police City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 VIA FAX AND MAIL Dear Chief Harrell: This letter is in response to your October 8, 2001, memorandum to John Dean regarding the semi- truck owned by John Miller.at 3149 Inverness Lane. We have since discussed this matter on the telephone, but I thought it ~rfight be helpful to provide a more formal response in case these issues end up before the Council as part of an abatement proceeding. Your first question was whether Mr. Miller is in violation of City Code Section 350:760, subd. 4: Truck parking in Residential Areas. No motor vehicle over one (1) ton capacity bearing a commercial hcense .'.. shall be parked or stored in a platted residential district .... Mr. Miller has placed a "collector" plate on the windshield of the semi-truck. (Despite the display of the "collector" plate, there is a question whether Miller is storing mad maintaining the track in compliance with Minnesota Statutes Section 168.10, subd. l(e) (requiring that collector's vehicles be screened from ordinary public view) and subd. 1 (f) (requiring that any collector vehicle have all equipment in operating condition)). Nonetheless, if the truck is over one ton but does not bear a commercial license, it would be difficult to argue that Miller is in violation of tl6s section. However, City Code Section 350:715 states that Passenger vehicles and trucks in an inoperative state shall not be parked in residential districts for a period exceeding ninety-six (96) hours; inoperative shall mean incapable of movement under their own power and in need of repairs or removal to junk yard. There is no question the truck has been parked in the stone location for more than 96 hours. Also, it appears that the truck is inoperative. The photographs show at least one flat tire; the truck has been -402- Len Harrell November 6, 2001 Page 2 of 3 parked in the same location for several years; and, Mr. Miller has declined to demonstrate that the vehicle is operable. Thus, it is my opinion that Mr. Miller is in violation of Section 350:715. Your second question was whether the nuisance ordinance applies in this situation because the ordinance does not specifically identify trucks. City Code Section 1000.15A provides the following: Public Nuisances Affecting Peace and Safety. The following are declared to be public nuisances affecting public peace and safety. (o) Ail dangerous, unguarded machinery, including derelict autos, derelict boats, and derelict refrigerators mud freezers, in any public place, or so situated or operated on private property as to attract the public. It is my opinion that this section does not necessarily exclude trucks from being considered a public nuisance. My interpretation of this section is that it is not an exhaustive hst of public nuisances. The plzrase "all dangerous, unguarded machinery including ..." is only a precursor to several examples of public nuisances. Further, the Miller truck may be a nuisance as defined in Section 1000.01, regardless of whether it falls into the category of a nuisance "affecting peace and safety" under section 10.00.15A. Section 1000.01 states that Whoever by his or her act or failure to perform a legal duty intentionally does any of the following is guilty of maintaining a public nuisance, which is a misdemeanor: (a) Maintains or permits a condition which unreasonably mmoys, injures, or endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort, or repose of any considerable number of members of the public... Again, despite, the fact that a "derelict truck" is not explicitly declared to be a public nuisance affecting peace and safety under 1000.15A, it is my opinion that Mr. Miller may be guilty of maintaining a public nuisance under Section 1000.01. His failure to remove the truck has permitted a condition which arguably unreasonably annoys and potentially endangers the safety and repose of the people in his neighborhood..Undoubtedly, the truck could be attractive to children, not to mention it is just an eyesore. As a result, I believe the City Council has a basis upon which to abate the nuisance under City Code Section 1000.25. I spoke with Craig Mertz regarding this situation. Craig thought that if the Council were to decide to move forward with abatement that it ~night be a good idea to simultaneously have a citation pending for violation of city ordinance. I also spoke with CSO Michelle Salter who in mm contacted Mr. Miller on October 25, 2001. Miller informed her that he was planning to have the truck towed. I would suggest following up to see if the truck has indeed been towed. I.f not, I recommend moving ahead with the plan that we discussed to take additional photographs and issue the citation. MDT-204933vl MU220-3 2 -403- Len HarreI1 November 6, 2001 Page 3 of 3 I hope this adequately addresses your questions. we should discuss this matter further. Sincerely, MDT:gak cc: John Dean Kandis Hanson Craig Mertz If the Council decides to proceed with abatement, MDT-204933vl MU220-3 3 -404- MEMORANDUM TO: John Dean FROM: Mary Tietjcn DATE: January 14, 2002 Commemial Dock License Requirement for Condominium Association City of Mound You asked me to review the Mound City Code to determine whether a eondomim'um association's operation of a boat dock is a "commercial boat dock" and thus, subject to licensing. The condornim'um association is a for-profit organiTation. It is my understanding that members of the association use the docks for anchoring and storing of personal boats and watercraft. Section 436 of the Mound Code governs commercial boat docks and sets forth various licensing requirements and regulations. The Code's license requirement is very broad: No person, assodation of persons, families whether incorporated or not, through any arrangement, whether through contrnon or corporate ownership or otherwise, shall operate, carry on, or be engaged in the trade or business of docking mooting, anchoring, keeping or storing of boats or make any arrangement for the use or joint use of lakeshore property for such dockage of boats.., without having first obtained a license. Section 436.05. "Business of docking" is defined under the code as: "Renting or otherwise providing space for docking, anchoring, or storing three or more boats.., belonging to persons other than the owner of the dock or property." § 436.01, subd. 2. Finally, "commercial boat dock" is defined as: Providing space for docldng, mooting at buoy, or otherwise keeping or storing of boats... used in a trade or business or providing through the joint use of lakeshore property such space for boats or vcatercraft belonging to persons or families who are part of a group or association. Section 436.01, subd. 1. The condo association is an "association of persons" that has made arrangements for the joint use of lakeshore property for the docking of boats. Under the code, the association does not have to be incorporated to fit within this category of persons required to obtain a license. In addition, the Mound Code does not require that the business of docking be a for-profit enterprise. The condo association is "providing space for docking" (I assume for more than 3 boats) for individuals, other than the owner of the dock, who are part of a group or association. The Code does not otherwise exempt the condo association from the licensing requirements. Thus, it is my opinion that a eondomim'um association clearly fits within the relevant code definitions that would require it to obtain a license to continue to operate its docks. IvlI)T-208647vl MU220-6 -405- '~ ZZ ZZ Z ZZZZZZ 0 0~00000 -406- Mound City Code 436.00 S~fion 436 - COMMERCIAL BOAT DOCKS 4~.01 Definitions. For the purpose of this Section, the following definitions shall apply: Subd. 1, Commercial Boat Dock. Providing space for docking, mooring at buoy, or. otherwise k~ping or storing of boats, barges, or other floating structures used in a trade or bu~aess or peoviding through the joint use of lakeshore property such space for boats or watercraft belonging to persons or families who are part of a group or association. / Subd. 2. Busine~.s of Docking or Storing of Boats. Reining or otherwise providing ~aee for docking, anchoring, or storing three or more boats or floating, structures belonging to persons other than the owner of the dock or property upon which said boat or st, memos, are do¢-ked or stored or adjacent to which said boats are moored. Subd, 3, Dock. Any Wharf, pier, or other structure constructed or maintained in be lake. whether floatng or not, including all "Ls" or "Ts" or posts which may be a part .thereof, whether ~fi~d or adjacent to the principle structure. Subd, 4. Mooring. Any buoy, post, structure, or other device at which a watercraft may be moored and which is surrounded by navigable water. Subd~ 5, Autho.rized. Commercial:Dock Use Area. Tl~at area in the lake which may be used for ¢ommemial boat docks, moorings, boat.storage, or which may be enclosed on three sides for any of these purposes. Sub& 6. Site. Any shoreline tot, parcel, or other piece of property legally suMiwided and recto, der in the. office of the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. Subd. 7. Stored. hou,s. Any boat or other watercraft docked or moored for more than 12 4~,05 ~eense R~quired. No person, association of persons, or families whether ineorpo~ or-. not~ through any .a~angement, whether through common or corporate ownership ~ oflaer~i~e, sha~. 1 otis, ate, ~ on, or be ~ngaged in the ~ade or business of docking, mooring, aa¢.hofiag, kee~ing or sto~ag o~' boats or make any arrangement for the use or joint use of lakes ~hom t~r. ogeny for ~aeh dockage .of boats and watemraft within the corporate limits of this City without l~viag first, obtained a license. Any person, firm, or corporation or group or association of persen~ desieiag such 'a license, shall ~mak¢ application in writing to the City Council which ~l~l,ic~ shal,1 be signed b~ t~ applicant and filed with the City Clerk. The application shall set forfla tta, ms and resid~ee of ~ ~[icant, exact location at which .the applicant proposes to e~ on .'hi:s: or her business or use of lakeshom property, and whether he or she is then or has -407- Mound City Code 436.10 heretofore be,n engaged in a similar business. The application shall be accompanied by a sketch of the propos~ facilities, including location and type of buoy to be used therewith and the parking facilities as well as a sta~ment outlining the manner, extent, and degree of use contemplated. The Clerk shall preseut the application to the City Council. at its next regular meeting after the filing thereof. .. 436.10 Rea~!h.fion of Commercial Boat Do.cks. In the event, boat storage facilities are provided, any ~n owning or operating a Commercial Boat Dock shall comply with the following mi 'mmum standards: Subd, 1. Fire H~ards. All watercraft shall be stored in such a manner that they do not create a fire hazard. Subd, 2. Gasoline ~orage. Any gasoline offered for sale or stored on the premises shall be placed in tanks or containers as may be required by the City Council and by City and State fire regulations,, and such tanks or containers shall be stored underground or such distance from the storage facilities so as not to create a danger in the community. Subd, 3, Gasoline Sales. Gasoline sales shall not. be made from the dock at which cu .m}mer's watercraft are stored. Subd, 4. Buoys. The location and marking of all buoys shall be subject to the regulation of the Council. Subd. $. Orderly Maintenance. The premises shall at all times be maintained in a neat and orderly manner. ..' Subd, 6. Parking. Off-street parking shall be provided as follows: One off-street la~t~i.~ .ng stall for. each'.three rental boat stalls, buoys, or slips avail, able to customers or joint u~r~, Sub& 7. NO R~idential Use. No bOat or other floafi.ng structure tied up or ~ted to su~ dock facilities shall be used as a permanent, t~mporary, or Seasonal residea~e.' 4~.15 IAm!tation of Commercial Dockage. No person shall anchor, keep, moor, dock, or s~om a boa~, {tuner, raft, barge, or other watemraft within the harbor limits of this City except at a dock o~ baoy which is in. compliance with the terms of this Section 436~ except, however, that a ripariaa owner may dock or store, boats and other watercraft, in the natural body of water adjoining his o~, h~r p~'ope~ ina manner which will not interfere wi.th boat waffle, legitimate use ms tt~ la~., or Mfringe upon abe riparian fl~ght$ and privileges of abutting property eveners. 2 2/25,/01 -408- Mound City 436.20 436.20 Rendition of Commercial Boat Docks. Subfi. 1. Prohibition. No person, firm, corporation, or association shzll use any ~ea of the l~e a~ an authorized commercial dock use area, for commercial docks, moorMgs, or boat storage unless such use is specifically permitted and licensed under the provisions of this Section 436. Subd. 2. Aut. h0rizod Commercial Dock Use Ar~a. An'authorized corrmercial dock use area is described as follows: (~ ~Le....ng~ - The authorized commercial dock use area for sites bordering on the lake extends into the lake a distance equal to the site lake frontage to be measured at right angles to the side site lines and, except as provided herein, shall not extend into the lake a distance greater than 200 feet to be measured in a line parallel to the side site line as extended into the lake. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subdivision, commercial docks in existence or authorized by other governmental agencies and under construction on the date' this ordinance becomes effective shall be considered nonconforming use and may continue in existence without the necessity for the granting of a variance under the provisions of Subsection 436.40. Said nonconforming docks shall be subject to the provisions and limitations set fovrah in Section 3,50 of the City Zoning Code and of'all regulations subsequently adopted regarding nonconforming uses. Width - The authorized dock use area for sites bordering on the lake is limited in width by ~ setback limitations prescribed herein. The setback from side site lines as extended in the lake shall be as follows: For that portion of the length of the an~o~ commercial dock use area wMch extends from the sh9~ The setback shall be Z~ro .to 5,0 f~.t 10 feet 50 to 100 feet 15 feet 1.~ to 200 feet 20 feet Subd. 3. Structures Not to Obstruct. No licensed dock, mooring, or other structure shall be $o located as.~to obsm~, t a navigable channel, or so as to obstruct reasonable access to any other dock, mooring area, or similar structure authorized under this Section 436. No doek~,~, mo~,viag area, or similar structure shall be located or designed so that i,t tmneo.e~ ,ar~it~, requires or. encourages boats using it to encroach into any other authorized oommem.ial dock uae area or into individually owned private dock areas. 3 2/25/01 -409- Mound City Code 436.20, Subd. 4. Subd, 4. Space Between Boats. Reasonable space shall be provided in mooring ar~as to allow navigation freely between' moored watercraft. Subd. $, Extensions. No commemial dock or mooring area shall extend across the extemied zone line between sites zoned differently by the City. Subd. 6. Un~! Configurations. Where the provisions of thi's Section 436 would cause the authorized commercial dock use area of two or more sites to overlap, or where there is. any. other unusual configuration of shoreline or extended lot lines, whichcauses a conflict betw~n the owners of two or more adjacent or nearby sites as the use of the same area of the lake for docks, mooting areas, or other structures or for reasonable access thereto, the owner of any of the affected sites may apply to the Council for a variance. Subd. 7, Construction~ Repair and Maintenanc~ Standards. (a) General Rule. All commercial docks, mooring, and other structures shall be constructed and maintained as provided in.this Section 436, Materials, Docks, moorings, and other structures, whether temporary or permanent, shall be constructed of such materials and in such a manner as the ovmer determines, provided that they shall be so built and maintained that they do not constitute a hazard to the public using the waters of the lake. Safety. Commercial docks or mooring areas may be constructed of such materials and in such a. manner as the owner determines provided that such, dock or mooring area shall be so built and maintained as to be safe fOr use by the public. ~. Commercial docks shall be suitably and'adequately lighted in'aCcordance with City regulations. No oscillating, rotating, flashing or moving sign or light may...Im~, unit ,on. any dock. D,o~k lighting shall not be directed toward the lake in nmb a. manta, r :flint i,t impairs: the wi:sion of or confuse operators of watercraft. Sing[ No ad~:ortising signs .may be displayed from any dock other than aa ~,iag S~. wlak:h ~alt be no larger than si.x squ~e feet in area. (0. ,$:uolll~. Installation of e!ect~ieal and fueling facilities on 'moorings, and other structures shall ~ in accordance with codes and. subject to state and local inspect.ion p~ocedures. such .e!~e~iaal or ~eling installations shall mal.ntain records of ~tat~ and local codes and regulations. · F-,' ~,.tor, s',:~-~ :n...si~, In.e.xer. e..ising its discretion in granting or denying licenses, the ~ane, li may~ ~i~., among other things., the following: 4 2/Z5/01 -410- (1) (Z) (3) (4) (5) 43.6.25 (6) (7) (s) 436.20, S~lxl. 7, (g) Whether the commercial dock or mooting area will be structurally safe for use by the intended use.rs. Whether the facility will comply with the regulations contained in this Section 436. Whether the proposed facility will create a volume of traffic on. the lake in the vicinity of the facility which will tend to be unsafe, or whi'ch Will cause an undue burden of waffle upon the lake in the vicinity of the facility. Whether the proposed facility will be compatible with the adjacent development. Whether the proposed facility will be compatible with the maintenance of the natural beauty of the lake. Whether the proposed facility will affect the quality of the water of the lake and the ecology of the lake. Whether the proposed facility, by reason of noise, fumes, or other nuisance charaeteristies~ will tend to be a source of nuisance or annoyance to persons in the vicinity of the facility. Whether adequate sanitary facilities Will be provided in connection with the proposed facility. License Fee and License ,Applications. Subd. 1. Expiration. and Fee. Any license issued by the Council pursuant to this Seefi~ 436 shall expi~ 'on April 1 next following its issuance. The base fee for new applications and for renewal applications, plus an additional fee for each boat aeeommodation, shall be established in accordance with the provisions of Section 500 of the City Code. (OR~ 01-200~, 2125/01) Subd. 2. License Appli~ti0ns for Docks, License applications shall be obtained at ~ Ci,gt offices. Sue, h applications sh~t state completely the infommtion required by Sub~eet~n 436,05 and by t~ City Manager or the Dock Inspector. Sub& 1,' Ap¢icatiog, Ffling. Applications for licenses shall be filed with, the Dock Ia~p~,tov at the ~;¢ 0ffi%S.and he shall recommend to the City Council that the license be alal~rovM or denied, No license will be recommended or authorized until the Dock Ia~eetor detemai,nes that the proposed dock complies substantially with the terms of all C~ o~diaaae~. 5 2/25/01 -411 - Motmd Cit~ ~ 436.25, Sub& 4. Subd. 4. App,hTeation I~,ad, l!nea. Applications for dock licenses shal.l be made botw~n January 1 ,and the last day of February of each year. Subd. $., Late Applications. All. applications received on or after March 1 shall,be sabject to a late fee as establ~ in accordance with the provisions, of Section 500 of the City Code. (OR.D 01-2001, 2/25/01) 4.36.30 Issuance of License. Subd. 1, Any license issued by the Council pursuant to this Section 436 may'contain ~m~ie. fions as ~ Council deems necessary to protect the health, welfare, and safety of the g~ml public from over burdening the primary harbor limits of ti.is City and the lakeshor¢ at any p .mieular location having in mind (among other things) parking problems, safety requirements for docking and. mooring, eontarnination of the lake for boat traffic of alt kinds. Each lieen~ when issued shall contain a statement of the restrictions and coati,ti°ns and ~id license with meh ms .trictions and conditions shall be conspicuously posted on the licen~ promises. Subd. 2. No Iicense shall be issued by the Council pursuant to this Secti°n 435 authorizing a commemial boat dock or boat docking or storage upon property within the confines of this City contrary to the regulations and limitations applying to said property set forth, in the CiF"s Zoning Ordinance. 436.35 Inspection. The City Council or such officer as may be designated by fine Co .uaeil for the purpos,s may, at reasonable times, inspect or cause to be inspected any such. licensed commercial boat dock, and d it shall appear that such dock has not been constructed or is not being maintained or u~d in accordance with the license issued by the Council, or in accordance wish the t~.wa~ of this Section 436, the' Council, by its City Manager, shall notify, the owner lt~r~of in wrifi, ng of the way or ways suoh dock does not comply with the license requi.red in this Section, a~r which the owner shall, have ten days to remove the dock or make the same comply with tt~ tomas of the license and this Section. 436. If the violation is not corrected within the agottod 6n~ tl~ Council shai.l revoke the license. Notification under this Section 436 shall be made in wri4ag to the owr~r of the dock at the address given in the. application, Failure to have a · ~al,id lic, on~ ia rome ~ .~.I.. be prima facie evidence of a violation of this Section 436. 4~36.40 Variances. $~iut, L Yankees;. When ~Gramed. Where practical difficulties or partieut.ar hav~s oeeu~ ~.'-couaeit, upon applie~on of a person affected, may ~rmit a variance f, mra the mqui;mm~nts of this $~etion 43.6 or may require a v~iance from what is oah~rwise pc.mai ~a~., by this Section 4.36, provided that such variance with whatever ooadi,ions ge d~om~d, n~¢~.s~ by the Council, does not. adve:sely .affect the purposes of this ~fioa 436~. ~ public health, safari, and weffare, and reasonable access to, or of, the take by the pablie or ripa~an ow.nets. 6 2/25/01 -412- ,Mound., 436A0, Subd. 2. Subd. 2. Variance; Application. Applications for variances shall be filed with the City Manager. The application shall contain: (c) (d) (e) (0 (g) Thc name and address of thc applicant; The description and location of the property for which the variance is sought; The variance for which the application is made; The names and addresses of the owners of abutting sites; A map or plat of the sRe for wMch the variance is sought, and of abutting or other affected sites, showing any existing docks, moorings, or other structures or the proposed location or relocation of any such structures; The consent of the applicant permitting' officers and agents of the City to enter upon the applicant' s premises at reasonable times to investigate the application and to determine compliance with any variance which may be granted; Such otb_er information, such as surveys and photographs, as the City Manager may re, quire to assist the Council in consideration of the application. Subd, 3, Variance;, Fee. The variance application shall be accompanied by an application fee as established in accordance with the provisions of Section 500 of the City Code. (ORD 0-t-2001, 2/25/01). Such fee shall not be refunded at any time after the processing of the application, has been commenced. Subd. 4. Hearings, Upon receipt of a completed variance application, the City Manager shall schedule a hearing by the CounCil on the application. The Council may grant a variance from the literal provisions of this Section 436 in imtanees where their strict enfomement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property or properties under consideration, and shall grant ~ch variances only when it is demonstrateA .that such. actions will be in keeping with'the spirit and intent of this Section 436. The Council may impose conditions on ~_e riparian owners and use, rs of the lake. Subd, $,. Vi0htions. Locating, constructing, installing, or maintaini, nga eommemial dook, mooting, or' o~r structure in. a.~r different from the terms and conditions of a lieen~ or vafian~ which is ordered or permitted is a violation of this Section 436 and gmund~ for rescission of the v.arianee. 436.45 Re~tion,t0:~ke ~IP,net,o.~,nka Conservation District and Other ~vernmen_tal A.gen¢ie$. Re p~'°~i~n~ Of ~s S~fion 436 shall not SUpersede 'any 'ordin~ee 'of the Lake M',mne-tonka ~mafion Digtfict or other governmental agencies that are more. resM, 'cfi~,e in thei,r l~ovisions and application to: .Commercial Boat Docks and Dockage. This Section 436 shall not relieve fine applicant from.obtaining licenses and permits required by other governmental agencies. 7 -413- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Kandie Bonnie City's On-Sale Liquor Licenses January 3, 2002 With the new real estate developments on our doorstep, research on the City's on-sale liquor licenses and fees was appropriate. The City is authorized by City Code 800.05, Subd. 2, to issue no more than three Class A (On-sale, hotel and restaurant) licenses. No Class B (Sunday Sales) licenses will be issued to anyone other than a licenses holding a valid Class A license. The current fee for the on-sale liquor license is $4,500/year. This fee seems in line with what other cities our size are charging, but substantially lower than our neighboring, smaller cities. Per the 2001 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Fee Survey, here are some fees of smaller, neighboring cities (under 2,500 population): City of Spring Park charges $9,0501year; ExcelSior c~arges $10,000/year; Long Lake charges ~,000/year. Bill Weeks of Spring Park stated that they receive opposition to the size of their fee, but justify it because of the expense that c~me from enforcement - mainly police time. I'm enclosing a copy of the fee survey for your reference. To raise the on-sale liquor license fee, a public hearing must be held by the Council. There is a requirement to mail notice to affected licensees at least 30 days before the date set for the hearing. VVe don't have any affected licensees at this time. Them is no state requirement for publishing the notice. You may want to bring this to the Council's attention, in effort to be pm-active regarding this issue. If you need any additional info, please let me know. ~an 87 ZBBZ 15:37:3B Via ?ax AMM FAX II II I State of the State Focuses on Deficit On Thursday, January 3, during his an- nual State of the State address, Gover- nor Ventura discussed the state's $1.953 billion budget deficit for fiscal year2002- 03, as we//as its ongoing $1.2 billion shortfall. The Governor stated that he expects the deficit to be resolved quickly and that he wi//have a detailed budget- ba/ancing p/an by January 10. Whi/e pro- riding no specifics, the Governor stated that there are no "sacred cows"- al/por- tions of the budget wi//need to share in tcut& Ha noted that five major bud- areas consume 85 percent of the o's resources. The five areas are K- I2 education (41%), health care (i7%), higher ed (10%), local government aids and credits (10%), and/tea/th and hu- man service (7%). The Governor indi- cated t~at he would prefer that the defi- cit be covered by spending cuts, rather than tax increases, but that nothing is off the table. He hinted that he would be open to expanding the sa/es tax base, possibly to include clothing or services. -> 55Z47ZBGZB Kan&is Hanson Pa§e 00Z Of BOZ r0vidirl I ttrtn m ,, .I - servi0ee and 01ua0na January 7 -11,2001 II Potential Impact of State Budget Woes on City Aids and Credits In 2002, Minnesota cities are expected to receive approximately $540 million in Local Government Aid (LGA) and $160 million from the new market value homestead credit, While LGA is often the first program that comes to mind when the state starts talking about reducing intergovernmental aids, the market value homestead credit could also be impacted by a[tempts to address the budget deficit. In the past, when the state has made cuts in intergovernmental aids, it has typically looked to cut programs, such as the old HACA, that went out to all types of LGUs (cities, counties, and school districts). However, due to the changes made to inter- governmental aids during the 2001 session, there aren't very many broad-reaching aid programs left - with the exception of the market value homestead credit. This new credit automatically appears on homeowners' tax bills, thus reducing the amount they must pay. The amount of the credit varies based on the market value of the home, peaking at $304 for a $76,000 home and phasing out entirely for a $414,000 home. The state then reimburses cities, counties, school districts and special districts for their portion of the credit, based on their share of the total tax bill, thus ensuring that each LGU ultimately cotlects the entire amount it levied. The credit is currently sched- uled to be paid out in two installments - one in late October and one in late Decem- ber, but the payment of these credits could be impacted by budget cuts. (TIF dis- tricts will receive their credit payments in one lump sum in late December_) Another approach the state has taken in the past to reduce aids to local govern- ments is to use a formula that calculates each city's "revenue base," which is the sum of their levy plus aids, and then take a percentage of that base as a reduction in aid and/or credit payments. (The reduction comes out of aid payments first, but if a city doesn't receive any aid or doesn't receive enough to cover their reduction, credit payments could also be reduced.) The percentage reduction is dependent on the amount of money the legislature decides to cut from intergovern menal aids. i Association of M~tropoli:an Munidpalitics 145 University Avenue fi/est St, Paul MN 55105-2044 Phone: (651) 215-4000 Fax: (6.q]) 281-1299 E-mnll: amm~amrnl 4$.org ~IMM F~x N~'ws is faxed zo all AMM city r~mag¢~ and a~n~o~, l~g~ive ~d Board ~er$, Plebe share this with your ~yo~, councll~grs ~d to keep them ab~e~t of i~o~t ~ro Met Council Committee to Begin Blueprint Discussions, AMM to Present Results of Regional Forums The Metropolitan Council has organized a committee of the whole to review and prepare the 2002 Blueprint. The committee will meet on two Wednesdays each month. The January meetings are scheduled for January 16 and January 30. At the January 16 meeting AMM will discuss with the commil/ee ways to communicate the Blueprint's work products to cities. We will also summarize the findings from the regional meetings held in November and December. The presentation will be posted on the AMM website prior to the 16% so that members may review it and send comments to Kris Lyndon Wilson at kristine~amm145.or.q. -415- TOTRL P.02 Jan lB 2882 17:23:37 Vi~ Fax AMM FAX -> 9524728628 Eanclis Hanson Page 082 Of 883 l:krlnershil in pro, ding January 7-11,2001, no. 2 Governor Announces Plan to Address State's $1.95 M. Deficit To offset the state's $1.953 billion budget deficit for fiscal years 2002/2003, Governor Ventura is proposing $700 million in spend- ing cuts, $397 million in tax changes/increases, and the use of $667 million in reserves, including the $14 million set aside last ses- sion for reforming LGA, He also anticipates approximately $340 million in savings as a result of re- financing general fund transporta- tion appropriations with transpor- tation bonds and using other ances. Noting that it will cost the state $3.7 million for every week of inaction, Governor Ventura said the Legis- lature should be prepared to act on his plan by the first week of Feb- of the budget, grouped together, would be reduced by 5.3 percent. The proposed cuts for fiscal years 2004/2005 include a larger reduc- tion of 10,5 percent ($323 million) for local govemrnent aids. LGA Reductions The 5.2 percent reduction in local government aids for fiscal years 2002/2003 amounts to $146 mil- lion. This includes a $73,703, reduction in city LGA and a $29,052,000 reduction in county HACA. It also includes market value credit aid reductions of $11, 491,000 for cities and $25,268,000 for counties. The re- mashing money would come from townships ($2,831,000) and spe- cial districts ($3,568,000). Association of Hetropoliran Hunicipalitics 145 UniverMgy Avenue FFe~t ~. Paul~ M3I $$105.2044 Phone: (651) 215.4000 E. maiL. amm~arnml 4$.olg AMM Fa~ Noes_ i~ faxed to all AMM rnan~gers and admini~tnttors, legislative con- facts and Board members. Pleme shttre this fax with your tn~.vors, councllmembers and staff to keep them abreast ojeimpOt~tnt metro city i~ues. While it proposes spending down the state's entire $653 million bud- get reserve, the Governor's pro- posa{ also includes a plan to re- store 60 percent of that amount ($389 million) by July 1,2003. The spending cuts proposed for fiscal years 2002/2003 include a 0.9 percent reduction in K-12 edu- cation, 2.5 percent in higher ed., 5.2 percent in local government aids and 1.5 percent in health and human services. All other areas The LGA reduction would be achieved two ways, First of all, all cities would experience a uniform reduction in their 2002 LGA equal to two percent of their levy plus aids, which would save the state $25, 679,000. For 2003, all cities would experience a reduction in their LG^ equal to 1.7 percent of their adjusted net tax capacity. A second round of cuts, which the Governor's plan refers to as "ex- ces~" aid reductions, would target -416- ~an lB Z80Z 17:Z4:Z1 ~a Fax -> 95Z4?ZSGZB KanSas Hanson Association of Metropolitan Municipalities News Fax January 7- 11, 2002, no. 2, page 2 of 2 cities where the growth in lew plus lids for Z002 has exceeded infla- tion and population growth, These "excess" aid reductions would to- tal $48,024,000 million, and are being justified by the fact that the growth in levies plus aids for 2002 is 9.09 percent for cities, which significantly exceeds the three- year average of 4.13 percent. The Governor's budget document notes that if a city does not receive enough LGA to cover this "excess" aid reduction, the remainder would be taken out of their market value homestead credit aid. At this time, it is unclear whether this would apply to the uniform aid reduction as well. The Governor's plan would ensure that no city or county will experience a permanent reduction l~estate ams that exceeds six per- nt of its tax base. Levy limits for 2003 well be adjusted to allow cities to levy back for the uniform aid reduction, but cities would have to get voter approval in order to levy back for any "ex- cess'' aid reduction. To help address cash flow prob- lems, the Governor's plan would send cities half of the LGA pay- ment they are scheduled to receive in July of 2002 in March. Partial Payment of Market Value Homestead Credit In addition to the LGA cuts, the Governor's proposal would also reduce payment of the market value homestead credit to all cit- ies by 2 percent for 2002. Unlike the LGA reductions, this appears to be a one-time reduction that would not continue for 2003. During his remarks, the Governor stressed that his plan would not "raid" local government fund bal- ances, but that he does expect lo- cal governments to rely on their fund balances to cover expenses in the short-term, until more perma- nent spending and tax decisions can be made. He also stressed that he expects cities and counties to increase tax levies in 2003 only as a last resorL Revenue Raising Steps The primary revenue raising steps included in the Governor's pro- posal are a five-cent increase in the gas tax, and indexing the tax to inflation; a 29-cent increase in the cigarette tax, with comparable percentage increases in other to- bacco taxes; and the expansion of the sales tax to cover purchases made by school districts, motor vehicle repairs, legal services pur- chased by individuals, newspa- pers and magazines, institutional meals and telemarketing calls. Businesses and cities that pur- chase legal services would not be subject to the sales tax. The Governor's plan calls for the gas tax and cigarette tax increases to go into effect March 1,2002. The proposed gas tax increase would not yield additional money for transportation, but rather, it would allow the state to keep the MVST dollars in the general fund that it currently transfers to the Highway User Trust Fund. Addi- tionally, $245 million of the money allocated from the general fund in 2000 for highway bottlenecks and corridors would be used to help cover the deficit and then be re- placed by trunk highway bonds, which will be repaid by revenues resulting from indexing the gas tax. Again, this resu~ in no new money for transportation. This is a basic overview of the Governor's proposal. We will pro- vide additional details, including city-by-city information, as soon as it becomes available. In the mean- time, a link to the full text of the Governor's proposal is available at www.amm 145..or._q. -417- TOTRL P.03 Jan ll 2882 17:29:57 9ia Pax AMM FAX /ll~odatioll o[ ~letropolita, ~lunidpaliti¢~ Phone: (651) 215-4000 Fax~' (651) )~;rnail: amm~amml 4g. o~g ~MM Fax News is fwced to all AMM city manager~ and admintstra~r~, legislative ta~ls tad Board memb~. Please $l~a~e this fax with your mayors, cou~cilmembers and slaJf to keep them abreart of impo~tant rn~tro city issuer. -> 9524720GZB Xandis Hanson ~age BB2 Of 805 Partnerships in providing ervioes and solution January 7 -11, 2001, no. 3 Additional Info on the "Big Fix"' Attached is a spreadsheet showing the estimated impact of the Governor's proposed cuts to local government aid and credit programs for 2002 on AMM members. These preliminary estimates were provided to us by the Department of Revenue, and are based on the levies certified by cities in September of 2001. We do not yet have a clear under- standing of the impact of proposed cuts for 2003, but hope to provide you with that information early next week. Following a meeting of local govern- ment lobbyists this morning, we now have a better understanding of the proposed cuts for 2002 than we did at the time of yesterday's fax. As stated in that fax, some cities will be subject to a so-called "excess" aid reduction. This amountwill be taken from LGA first, and'then the market value homestead credit, in cases where there is not enough LGA to cover the reduction. The dollar amount of your city's "excess" aid reduction is the sum of the sixth and seventh columns on the attached spreadsheet. Additionally, all cities will be subject to a uniform aid reduction equal to two percent of their levy plus aids. This reduction, like the "excess aid reduction", will be taken first from LGA and then from the market value homestead credit, if necessary. The dollar amount of your city's uniform aid reduction is the sum of the eighth and ninth columns on the attached spreadsheet. It appears that the state will be tak- ing the "excess" aid reductions first, followed by the uniform aid reduction. In some cases, a city will have lost all of its state aid (LGA + market value homestead credit) to the 'excess" aid reduction, and therefore will not be subject to the uniform aid reduction, because they have nothing left to lose. It does not appear that thers will be an additional two-percent, across- the-board reduction in the market value homestead credit, as originally stated in yesterday's fax. Cities w~ receive complete reimbursement for the market value homestead credit, unless they do not receive enough LGA to cover their aid reductions. Legislative hearings on the Governor's proposal will begin next week. We will be monitoring them closely and updating you when more information becomes available. If you have any questions about the information contained on these spreadsheets or the proposed cuts for 2002, please do not hesitate to call or small us and we will do our best to answer your questions. Gene Ranied (651) 215 -4001 .qene~amm145.or~ Roger Peterson (651) 215 - 4002 ro.qer~amm 145.or.q Kris Wilson (651) 215-4003 kristine~,amm 145. or~q -418- Jan ii ZBBZ 17:30:qB Via Fax -> 95Zq?ZSGZO Xandis Hanson Page 883 Df §B5 -419- Jan 11ZBBZ 17:31:12 Via Fax -> 9524?ZBGZB KanSis Hanson ~a§e 8B4 0£ BBS -420- Jan 11 2082 17:31:44 Via Fax -> 9524720GZfl Xandis Hanson Page 085 - 421 - TOTRL P. 05 Jan 15 ZBBZ 15:5B:35 Via Fax AMM FAX em, 145 University Avenue SL Paul, MN $$105-2044 Phone: (g$1) 215-4000 Fox.. (651) 281-1299 E-mall: am~mml AMM Fax News is fa.~d to all ~IMM city managers and administrators, l~girladve aon- tacts attd Board membet~. Please share this fw: with your nnayors, councilrnembers and a~aff to Itee~o them al~rett~t of t~oorta~t metro ei~v ~su~v, -> 95Z4?ZBGZ8 gandis Hansan P tnemhiPS in ProViding ervioes and olution. January 14-18, 2002 Governor's Big Fix Impacts Categorical Grant Programs In addition to its impact on local government aids, Governor Ventura's proposal to cut $700 million in state spending will effect several grant programs used by cities. These programs include: TIF Grant Program. At the end of the 2001 session, the state appro- priated $129 million for fiscal years 2002 and 2003, to help cit- ies cover TIF district shortfalls re- sulting from the state's property tax reforms. The Governor's proposal would eliminate this funding, which would have come out of the state's current biennium but would not have been expended until the next biennium. The Governor is recom- mending that the TIF program be reviewed this year so that appro- pr/ate action can be taken during the 2003 session to address any shortfalls. Housing Programs. Under the Governor's proposal the current bi- ennial budget for housing pro- grams would be reduced by $7.5 million. The programs reduced, with their amounts, are: rehabilita- tion loans ($992,000), housing as- sistance ($1,800,000), challenge Program ($4,134,000), and manu- factured housing ($400,000). The administrative support program for the Section 8 homeownership pro- gram ($250,000) would be elimi- nated. Minnesota Investment Fund. This fund, which is administered by the Department of Trade and Eco- nomic Development (DTED), would be restructured to be a re- volving loan fund. The state would require repayment for all loans made in state fiscal year 2003 (a,~ tar July 1, 2002). Local govern- ments would no longer retain the repayment funds for local eco- nomic development. Reimbumements to Local Gov. amman ts for Law Enforcement Training. The Peace Officers Standards and Training (POST) Board would reduce the per officer training reimbursement from $419 to $378. The reduction would be- gin in state fiscal year 2002 and continue through the next biennium. Innovation Grants. The Board of Government Innovation and Coop- eration would reduce its grant pro- gram by $275,000 each year. The remaining $75,000 of its grant money would be used to assist lo- cal governments that voluntarily agree to consolidate. -422- J~ 1~ ZOOZ 15~5~J:ZZ ~ F~x -~ A$$oc/at/ol7 of lk/etropo#tafl MglliO/palifle$ News Fax Governor Proposes $845 Million Capital Budget, $746 in G.O. Bonding Governor Ventura has proposed a capital budget of $844.5 million, with $745.9 million to be financed by state-issued general obligation bonds. Of this $84~; million, $246 million would go to "facility repairs~ and $599 million would go to 'statewide strategic investments." The Governor is not rec- ommending funding for any of the 52 locally initiated projects, but is recom- mending funding for several state agency programs that provide grants to local units of government. These programs include: Local Bridge Repair and Replacement Grants (MnDOT) $30.0 mil. Wastewater Loans and Grants Flood Hazard Mitigation Grants (DNR) 2.0.0 Redevelopment Grant Program (DTED) 15.5 10.0 Livable Communities Grant Program (Met Council) 10.0 Energy Investment Loan Program (Dept. of Commerce) 6.0 Loans for Publicly Owned Transitional Housing (MHFA) Natural and Scenic Area Grants (DNR) 4.5 Trail Connection Grants (DNR) 1.0 0.5 The budget also includes $120 million for the Northstar commuter rail line and $50 million for transit improvements along the northwest metro busway. In addition to the $10 million for the Livable Communities Act (LCA), the Governor has recommended that the Metropolitan Council receive $10 mil- lion for the Shelling Garage project. The Governor has also recommended $8 million for capital improvements at metro regional parks. Met Council to Host Housing Practicum On Wednesday, Jan. 23, the Metropolitan Council will conduct its sec- ond practicum for local elected officials and staff. The session will fo- cus on two housing models - East Village in Minneapolis and Clover Ridge in Chaska. The session will be held from 8:15 to 11:15 a.m. in the Banquet Room of the St. Louis Park Recreation Center. To register please call Barbara at the Metropolitan Council (651~602-1633). -423- TOTAL P.03 Jan 10 ZOBZ 18:04:1G ~ia Fax -> 95Zq?ZOGZO ~&nini~%ra~or ~ag~ 881 0£ 882 · -FndayFax- A wee/dy legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities January 10, 2002 The Big Fix Today, the governor unveiled his supplemental budget recommendations to balance the state's budget. We are currently trying to analyze the impacts of the proposal. While we wait for a draft of the supplemental budget legislation, we are relying on the Department of Finance and Department of Revenue descriptions of the proposal. What follows is a brief, preliminary description of the proposal. For the remainder of the current biennium, the proposal includes a drawdown of the state's $653 million reserve, $700 million in spending cuts, $397 million in tax increases and other one-time changes in expenditures. The proposal also includes actions in the next biennium to balance the ongoing structural budget deficit. Cities will feel the pain. Of the $700 million in state spending cuts for the remainder of this biennium, cities will shoulder $214 million of the total. The city share includes the direct reductions in LGA and market-value homestead credit as described below and reductions in the tax increment financing grant program of $129 million. Although the TIF grant program was dramatically reduced, $38 million per year will apparently be preserved for FY 2004 and 2005. Although the budget materials do not directly address levy limits, it appears that the governor will extend levy limits into the future. In addition, cities affected by the "excess" aid reduction as defined below would be required to seek voter approval to replace the loss of revenue. In addition to the cuts in LGA and market value homestead credit reimbursement, the governor eliminates city police and fire amortization aids and the statutory inflationary increase in LGA that has annually increased the appropriation by approximately $14 million. These two changes are not effective until pay 2004. The proposal aLso includes a 5-cent increase in gas tax and an automatic indexing of the gas tax for future years, which will raise an estimated $199 million in FY 2003. To convert the gas tax increase into a general fund revenue, the proposal reduces the statutory dedication of the motor vehicle sales tax, which will save $194 million in general fund revenues. However, this means that the gas tax increase will only provide $5 million in new transportation revenue this biennium. In the future, cities will also feel the pinch on legal service and automobile repair costs. The state sales tax will be extended to those purchases beginning in 2003. Although the city share of that tax increase has not been estimated, the combined impact of the sales tax changes will increase state revenues by an estimated $604 million for the 2004-05 biennium. The governor has also proposed extending the sales tax to school purchases. One small positive notemthe LGA payments to cities will actually be accelerated. Instead of paying LGA in July and December, each city would receive ¼ of the total in March, ¼ in July and the remaining ½ on December 15. This change could modestly benefit each city's cash flow situation--assuming they still receive LGA City Aid Reductions Note: We have not yet seen detailed estimates of the impact of these cuts for individual cities. We will make that information available as soon as possible. Pay 20002 / State FY 2003: There are two components to the aid cuts---- an "excess" cut and a "uniform" cut. For more information on oily legislative issues, contacl any member of the League of Minnesota Ch[es Intergov,~rnmenlal R¢lation~ learn, 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 -424- Jori 18 ZOBZ 18:0q:SB ~io Fax -> 95Zq?ZBGZB Adninistr~tor Page 08Z 0£ BOZ -FridayFax- A weelcly legislative update from the League of Minr~sota Cities 1) "Excess" Aid Reduction--essentially reduces the revenue increase for cities that proposed relatively large levy + aid growth for 2002. * Applied to any city where the Pay 2001 to Pay 2002 levy + aid increase is greater than 4.5 percent. The 4.5 percent factor is equal to the 3-year statewide average annual growth rate in households plus inflation. · Cities with populations less than 1,000 are exempt from the excess levy cut. · A city's "excess" aid reduction equals the difference between its actual increase in levy + aid for Pay 2002 and an increase equal to its previous 3-year average annual growth rate in households plus inflation times 1.25. · Ifa city's 3-year average annual growth rate in households plus inflation is less than the 3-year average annual change in inflation (2.95%), then the city's rate will equal the average inflation rate. · The "excess" aid reduction is applied first to LGA, then if necessary to the market value homestead credit reimbursement. 2) Uniform Aid Reduction--essentially reduces aid to all cities. · For aids paid in 2002, the cut is equal to 2 percent of each city's levy + LGA. Aid Reductions for Pay 2003 / State FY 2004: 1) The "excess" aid reduction for Pay 2002 is extended to Pay 2003 aids. LGA reductions in Pay 2003 will first be applied to the grandfathered LGA base amount. January 10, 2002 · The pay 2002"excess" aid reduction applied to LGA is carried forward, as a permanent aid reduction applied to a city's levy + aid revenue base for pay 2003 for levy limit purposes. Howevers the reduction cannot exceed 6% of a city's payable 2002 adjusted net tax capacity (tax base). · The Pay 2002"excess" aid reduction applied to the market value homestead credit reimbursement is carried forward, not as an aid reduction, but as a levy reduction applied to the Pay 2003 levy * aid revenue base for levy limit purposes. This levy reduction cannot exceed 6% of a city's payable 2002 adjusted net tax capacity. · The Pay 2003 "excess" aid reductions can be restored as a levy increase if voters approve the increase. 2) Uniform aid reduction (all cities) · For payable year 2003, the uniform aid reduction rate will be 1.7% of 2002 adjusted net tax capacity. 3) Maximum cut--the combined aid reduction of both the "excess" aid reduction and the "uniform" aid reduction cannot exceed 6% of the city's 2002 adjusted net tax capacity. 4) Eliminate City Police / Fire Amortization Aid · If this additional aid cut results in a total aid reduction greater than 6% of ANTC, then the marginal reduction amount attributable to the amortization aid would be added to the city's LGA grandfathered base. 5) Statutory inflation for LGA is also eliminated in aids paid beginning in 2004. For more/nfo~m,,l/on on oily legislative issue-,, conlact any member of Ihe League of Minne~ot,, Cilies Inlergovemmcnlal Relations 653..281.1200 or 800.925.1122 -425- Jan 14 ZOBZ 13:51:Z4 ~ia Fax -> 95Z4?ZOGZ8 aaninistrator ~age 801 Of 88Z -FridayFax- A wee/dy legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities January 14, 2002 The "Big Fix" gets its first fix Last Thursday, the League distributed a FridayFax that described the Governor's proposed state aid cuts to cities. Over the weekend, the Department of Revenue discovered an error in the calculations for the second year of the cut. We expect that later today, the Department will release a revised spreadsheet with corrected estimates. The description of the cuts for this year (pay 2002) is NOT affected. The error affects the aid cuts for pay 2003 and beyond. The error will not lessen the pain but will redistribute the impact of the 2003 cuts. In a meeting with Department of Revenue staff this morning, we were apprised of the possible resolution to the error. The error assumed that some cities were receiving more LGA than is actually currently distributed and therefore that the cut would save a greater amount for the state. To generate a similar total savings from state aid cuts, the amount of the 2003 "uniform" aid reduction percentage was increased to 1.957 percent of each city's adjusted net tax capacity and where the cut is greater than a city's LGA, the balance would be applied to the market value homestead credit reimbursement. The following is a description of the revised cut proposal that we expect to be released later today. Changes are noted in italics. City Aid Reductions Pay 20002 / State FY 2003 The description of the 2002 cuts has NOT changed from the description included in the 1/10/2002 FridayFax. However, in our meeting this morning with Department of Revenue staff, we received clarification that the revenue base upon which the "uniform" aid reduction will be computed includes the total of the city's certified property tax levy + LGA + taconite aids + transit aid for Greater Minnesota Cities. Aid Reductions for Pay 2003 / State FY 2004 (Note: This description HAS CHANGED) 1) The "excess" aid reduction for Pay 2002 is extended to Pay 2003 aids. · LGA reductions in Pay 2003 will first be applied to the grand fathered LGA base amount. · The pay 2002 "excess" aid reduction applied to LGA is carried forward, as a permanent aid reduction applied to a city's levy + aid revenue base for pay 2003 for levy limit purposes. · The Pay 2002"excess" aid reduction applied to the market value homestead credit reimbursement is carried forward, not as an aid reduction, but as a levy reduction applied to the Pay 2003 levy + aid revenue base for levy limit purposes. This levy reduction cannot exceed 6% of a city's payable 2002 adjusted net tax capacity. · The Pay 2003 "excess" aid reductions can be restored as a levy increase if voters approve the increase. 2) Uniform aid reduction (all cities) · For payable year 2003, the uniform aid reduction rate will be 1.96% (not l.7%) of 2002 adjusted net tax capacity. · The cut will first be applied to each city's LGA and then, if necessary, to the market valtte homestead credit reimbursement. 3) Maximum cut--the combined aid reduction of both the "excess" aid reduction and the For more information on oily legislalive issues, contac! any member of lbe League of Minnesota Cities Intergovernmental Relalions team, 651.281.1200 or 800,925.1122 -426- Jan 14 ZOOZ ~3:5Z:04 ~ia Fax -> 95ZqTZSGZB O~inis~ra~o~ ~a~e 80Z 0£ 88Z - Frid ay F ax - A weeldy legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities January 14, 2002 "uniform" aid reduction cannot exceed 6% of the city's 2002 adjusted net tax capacity. 4) Eliminate City Police / Fire Amortization Aid ° If this additional aid cut results in a total aid reduction greater than 6% of ANTC, then the marginal reduction amount attributable to the amortization aid would be added to the city's LGA grandfathered base. 5) Statutory inflation for LGA is also eliminated in aids paid beginning in 2004. We hope to have detailed estimates of the cuts available later today. We will post the information on the League's web site as soon as possible. House and Senate Schedule Hearings on Supplemental Budget Recommendations The House and Senate have scheduled preliminary hearings on the Governor's supplemental budget recommendations. The Senate select committee on the Revenue Forecast will meet at 1:00 p.m. today in Room 15 of the capitol and the House Tax committee will meet on Wednesday at 1:00 p.m. The governor's plans will be described Revenue Commissioner Matt Smith and Finance Commissioner Pam Wheelock. We expect these hearings will provide an early indication of the legislative reaction to the governor's plan. The "Not So Big" Bonding Bill This morning, Governor Ventura presented his 2002 Capital Budget amounting to $845 million. Nearly $745 million will be issued as general obligation bonds, with trunk highway fund, user financed bonds and other funds filling in the remainder. Similar to his 2000 capital budget recommendations, the Governor failed to include any local projects this year. More than 50 communities requested funding for significant local and regional projects. Although the governor's recommendations did not include any specific local projects, some local governments may benefit from the proposal indirectly. The Governor proposed $10 million to the MPCA for closed landfills, $30 million to DTED ($10 million for redevelopment, $4 million for wastewater infrastructure fund, and $16 million for the state revolving loan fund to match federal funds). Local bridges will see $30 million through MnDOT under the Governor's plans but local government road wetland replacement receives nothing (so much for the promises made by the state when the Wetlands Conservation Act was enacted). Both the House and Senate have indicated there are significant deficiencies in the governor's proposal and with interest rates at their lowest level in decades, we expect the legislature to rationalize a larger bonding package. The LMC expects the legislature's final bonding packaged to include more transportation, water and wastewater infrastructure funding. Even if a larger package is ultimately approved by the Legislature, anything above and beyond the Governor's recommendation could be subject to his veto or the governor could simply decide not to let the bonds. For more infmmation on city legislative issues, conlact any member of lhe League of M innesola Cities I ntergovemmenlal Relalions leam, 651.281.1200 or 800,925,1122 -427- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ' AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, January 9, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL . CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · 1/15/02 Lake Minnetonka Wetlands Task Force Meeting, 8:00 A,M. at. Deephaven City Hall · "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner, 2/7/02 at Lord Fietchers Old Lake Lodge READING OF MINUTES- 12/12/01 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) PUBLIC HEARING Big Island Inc., new multiple dock license application for the reconfigumti0n of 14 'Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 1500' of continuous shoreline. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration Wayzata Yacht Club (Site 2), new multiple dock license application for the reconfiguration of 26 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 326' of continuous shoreline. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration LAKE USE & RECREATION A) Discussion of Boating Trends on Lake Minnetonka Report, 1984 to 2000 (previously sent out-please bring to meeting); B) Additional Business; WATER STRUCTURES " A) Tonka Bay Sales, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of new multiple dock license, special density license, and variance applications for 24 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 475' of continuous shoreline; B) Bayview Event Center, new multiple dock license (minor change) application for 37 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 370' of continuous shoreline; C) Additional Business; -428- FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (12/16/01 12/3t/01) & (1/1702 - 1/15/02); B) November financial summary and balance sheet~, C) Additional Business; ADMINISTRATION A) Discussion of recommendations from the Nominating Committee for the 2002 LMCD Board Officers; B) Additional Business; 5.' EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE 6. SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLDBUSlNESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10.ADJOURNMENT -429- DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, December 12, 2001 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL MemberS present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spdng Park; Lili M~Miilan, OrOno; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; [~Oug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Craig Eggers, VictOria; Tom Gilman, Excels or; Paul Knudsen, Minnetdsta; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Andrea Ahrens, Mound; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Sheldon Wert, Greenwood. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · Foster stated that the 12J26/01 Regular LMCD Board Meeting had been cancelled. · Foster stated that the second zebra mussel stakeholder meeting was scheduled for Thursday, 12/13/01, at 7:00 p.m. at Deephaven City Hall. READING OF MINUTES. 11/14/01 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Seuntjens moVed, Knudsen seCOnded to approve the minutes from the 11/14/01 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: AYeS (8), Abstained (1, Eggers), motion carded. PUBLIC CoMMENTs. perSons in attendanCe, subjects not on the agenda. There were no comments from the public on subjects not on the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be aPprOved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Seuntjens moved, UcMiilan seconded to apProve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include: 1E, Hennepin County Shedffs Office Water Patrol Significant Activity Report, and 3B, October; financial summary and balance sheet, Ambrose and Gilman ardved at 7:02 p,m. PUBLIC HEARING · Tonka Bay Sales, new multiple dock license, special'density license, and variance applications for 24 Boat Storage Units (BSU's)on 475' of continuous shoreline. -430- Lake MinnetOnka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 Foster opened the public hearing at 7!02 p.m. and asked for background from staff. Page 2 Harper made the following comments: · New multiple dock license, special density license, and variance applications have been submitted to increase BSU's from 18 to 24 on 475' of continuous shoreline, which would result in a 1:20, watercraft density. Five sections of the Code apply to the applications submitted by the applicant, which include: Code Section 2.03, subd. 7; Section 2.01, subd. 1; Section 1.07; Section 2.01, subd. 1; and Section 2.05, subd. 2. · The proposed applications have been evaluated with these Code Sections and staff has determined that; a public hearing was needed because of the proposed increase in BSU's, the proposed site plan is not contained Within its authorized dock use area, an application for Vadance from COde to adjust the ~ southern extended side site line has been submitted'by the applicant, and the applicant has submi~ed a special densitY license application With propoSed pUblic amenities for each BSU over the 1:50' General Rule. The public amenities proposed bY the applicant have' been previoUsly approved bY the Board at the 5/23/01 Regular Meeting, noting that additignal public amenities .are not required by Code. · It was als~ determined that the prOPOsed change would not require a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) to be conducted because square footage for structure and maneuvering space would increase from 38,287 to 47,765. Environmental Quality BOard rules do nOt require a mandatory EAW until cumulative expansion exceeds an additional 20,000 square feet. The District prepared a mandatory EAW for the approved Plan in 2001, with the Board approving a motion for negative declaration on the need for conducting an Environmental impact Statement at the 5/9/01 Regular Meeting. · Staff believes the application of Code causes the applicant a physical hardShip because of a converging lot line. The Board needs to determine whether the adjusted dock use area, specifically .the south extended side site line, is reasonable and whether it Would impair access and navigatiOn tO the neighboring dock of the abutting property owner to the south Bayview Event Center. Any Board approval shoUld be on the condition that the MN DNR and the City of Excelsior raise no objections. Nybeck recommended that the applicant clarify the common lot line on the south end of the site and demonstrate how the extended side site line causes him a physical hardshiP. He stated that the dock use area adjustment proposed by the applicant would affect both the last finger and boat stored at the Bayview Event Center facility and there is probably a need to compromise how the dock use area is adjusted. This has been communicated to the applicant and he believed the applicant is prepared to address this. Babcock asked if the proposed applications require additional public amenity points from those approved in the spring 0f2001. ' ~' Harper stated that the public amenity points approved by the Board in the spring of 2001 would suffice for the proposed appliCatiOns Babcock stated that the proposed applications have been compOunded by the Change in ownerShiP and control of approximately 50' of shoreline at the site to the south, Bayview Event Center. Nybeck stated that a new multiple dock license application has been received from Bayview Event Center to reduce their shoreline from 420' to 370' and to reduce BSU's from 40 to 37. Babcock stated that the reduction of 50' of shoreline at the Bayview Event Center site isa result of shoreline that is under the control of the applicant rather than Bayview Event Center. Because there was no dispute on the -431 - 'Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 Page 3 site that had control of this 50' of shoreline, Tonka Bay Sales needed to submit a variance application because the southern extended site line converges in front of his shoreline. Mr. Gabbriel Jabbour, owner of Tonka Bay Sales, made the following comments: · The changeS approved to this facility in the spdng of 2001 have not been constructed Yet beCaUse there have been a number of land issue to resolve. · He reviewed the southern extended side site line and how the extended lot line parallels the shoreline, noting that a dock use area does not exist and that it needs to be adjusted. The original proposed site plan Would adjust the side site line.extension at a right angle to the shoreline. This would allow him to have a dock and boat storage'that complies with Code for minimum side setback requirements. The problem with this adjustment of the Side site line extenSiOn was that it would cause problems for Bayview Event Center for their last finger dOck and charter boat stored on the outside of the finger. He stated that he had communications with Bayview Event Center and they have indicated that they do not wish to remove the dock and boat in question. Additionally, BaYvieW Event Center has indicated that they would like some input on the type and size of boat parked next to this boat at the TonkaBay Sales facility. · He reviewed how the common side site line could be adjusted, noting that it would probably need to be a jagged line. He stated that he WOuld not be opposed to this; however, it would result in both parties not meeting minimum slate setback requirements. An agreement has been signed by both Parties agreeing to this, provided the boat parked in BSU #24 at Tonka Bay sales is aesthetically pleasing and no longer than 30' excluding the platform and platform. · The 50' of shoreline in question was a housekeeping issue because it was previously owned by the site to the south, however, it is currently underl his contrOl after it was tax forfeited a number of yearn ago. This housekeeping results in an aw~ard docking situation with the Bayview Event Center multiple dock facility, especially With the Changes that werre aPprOved not so long ago by the Board. · He entertained cOmments or questions from the Board. Nybeck stated that he believed the pdmary issues for the Board to consider are whether to adjust the southern extended side site line and how to deal with the side setback issues. Foster asked Jabbour whether he was satisfied with the amended proposed site plan that would result in both facilities not comply!ng with side setback requirements. Jabbour stated that he would be comfortable with the amended site plan because both parties have agreed to it. Mr. Bob Ziton, speaking on behalf of Bayview Event Center, stated that he would be agreeable to the proposed amended site plan. Foster stated that he believed the District has generally agreed in the past to adjUst extended site lines When they parallel the shoreline at a site. He noted that he was not troubled bY the jagged adjuSted side site line extension because both parties have agreed to it. Babcock stated that he believed the fundamental problem for the District to address is that Bayview Event Center has 10St control of approximately 50' of shOreline that has been previOusly dediCated to its facility. This has resulted in structure and boats at the Bayview Event Center being stored over the extended side site line as originally propoSed by Mr. Jabbour. He stated that he' believed the Distdct should adjust the extended side site line to deal with the i~side comer; however, he WOuld prefer adjusting it so that' b0th= facilities could meet minimum side setback requirements. He questioned whether the Board would have granted the approVed site -432- ,Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board IVleeting December 12, 2001 Page 4 plan for Bayview Event Center because the extended side site line would have been adjusted at that time prior to the docks being installed. He concluded that he would like more concessions from Bayview Event Center. Foster stated that he would be troubled to adjust the extended site line as originally proposed because it would result in the dock and boat storage at the Bayview Event oenter being considered non-conforming. The docks at Bayview Event Center are permanent in nature and he was encouraged that the two parties have agreed to a compromise on the adjusted dock use area. Babcock questioned whether the current site plan for Bayview Event Center would have been approved by the. Distdct because of the extended side site line that cuts in front of the Tonka Bay Sales site. He believed the Board made a decision to the best of its knowledge when the approved site plan was reviewed; however, it has changed when the control of 50' of shoreline has changed from Bayview Event Center to Tonka Bay Sales. LeFevere stated that this a peculiar situation because the authorized dock use area for Bayview Event Center got larger after it loss control of the 50' of shoreline in question. Jabbour stated that the 50' of shoreline in question was tax forfeited to the railroad authority in the early 1980's and he has an easement agreement with them. He noted that he would like to preserve the current Bayview Event Center multiple dock if possible; however, he would also like to preserve what he is entitled to. He believed the dock at Bayview Event Center has been in non-compliance for a number of years. Ziton re-stated that he supported the amended proposed site plan, provided that they do not need to move part of their dock structure. He noted that he was advised by staff that the current dock structure complies with Code for side setback requirements, noting that the only change made in recent years is that the slips were lengthened to accommodate charter boat storage and have not been moved to the north towards Tonka Bay Sales. He encouraged the Board to consider the amended proposed site plan because both affected parties would be accommodated. There being no further comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Gilman seconded to direct attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of new multiple dock license, special density license, and variance applications for Tonka Bay Sales. McMillan asked for clarification on variances needed for the amended proposed site plan because both plans would need zero foot variances. Nybeck stated that LeFevere advised him that the application for variance from Code would be sufficient for side setback variances at both facilities. Babcock asked what conditions should be included in the variance order to be prepared by LeFevere. Jabbour stated he would be agreeable to the conditions agreed to with Bayview Event Center. Mr. Charlie Carpenter, legal representation for Bayview Event Center, stated that he would like language added to the variance order that the adjusted side site line extension would include the existing pilings on the Bayview Event Center. Babcock asked Jabbour if he believed that he had sufficient navigability for a 30' long boat at BSU #24. -433- 'Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 Page'5 Jabbour stated that he believed that he would have. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Ordinance Amendment, Third reading of an ordinance prohibiting the use of motorized watercraft on certain parts of Lake Minnetonka, adding new Section 3.022. Foster · made the following comments on this agenda item: A substantial amount of information has been received from interested parties relating to this agenda item that the Board did not have sufficient time to review. · He believed the Board wants to maintain the environmental integrity of the tributaries leading into Lake Minnetonka, that the Board wants to address the pumhase of large amounts of shoreline for development purposes along these tributaries, and that the Board wants to address properties, primarily along Six Mile Creek, that have existing watercraft that use Lake Minnetonka and the possibility of grandfathering them. · At the recent annual meeting with the Shedffs Water Patrol, there was concern expressed by the Water Patrol on enforcement of grandfathedng. · LeFevere has prepared a memo on the subject of granting special privileges to owners of riparian property and the concept of exempting therefrom the proposed ordinance amendment. He reviewed alternative ways that he believed this could be accomplished. ~ · He entertained comments or feedback from the Board on this agenda item. Babcock stated that he believed the prOposed ordinance amendment for tributaries is being considered by the Distdct because he questioned whether the exiSting regulations for the Distdct and the affected member cities are adequate to protect these areas, including the 1:50' General Rule. He believed that the existing regulations are not adequate to address boat storage, access, and emergent vegetation in these tributaries. He expressed concern about the possible number of boats accessing Lake Minnetonka from developments on tributaries that have a large amount of shoreline. Foster stated that he believed one altemative for the Board to consider would be one watercraft at an existing platted site for existing owners. Babcock stated that if the Board considers grandfathedng, he believed that the kind of uses allowed needs to be considered. This could,include existing uses or future uses. McMillan stated that she underetood the General Rule for the City of Minnestrista to be 1:100'. She questioned whether Minnetdsta allows for outlots, Nybeck stated .he believed that the City,of Minnetdsta allows for outlots. McMillan stated that She believed the Upland Farms development is an outlot situation. LeFevere stated that there are a number of ways for the District to consider grandfathedng owners of riparian property that merit Board discussion. If the Board would 'like to prohibit motorized watercraft in certain tributaries and grant special privileges to specific properties, there is a need to determine how broad that -434- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 Page 6 special status would be, He stated that he was not making recommendations on this and that the Board needs to make these policy decisions. McMilian stated that she believed one of the issues for the Board to consider was how these tributaries and shallow areas of Lake Minnetonka are used from a recreational standpoint. These are areas where there are environmental concerns and she believed the Board should focus its discussion on this rather than property rights. She reviewed information received that was included in the Board packet, citing two sentences. "Boaters usually try to protect these habitats once they understand their ecological importance and are aware of their presence. Shallow water habitat destruction is due more to a lack of knowledge than to negligence".- She believed that these sentences summarized what the District is attempting to accomplish in this exercise. Foster stated that Dr. John Erdmann from WenCk and Associates was invited to attend this meeting to provide an overview of the preliminary report he prepared 'for the Uinnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) that discussed water quality impacts on the proposed Upland Farms Marina project. He welcomed Dr. Erdmann on behalf of the Board. Dr. John Erdmann, representing Wenck and Associates, stated that he was asked to review a report he prepared for the MCWD that addressed the prospect of water quality impacts relating to the proposed Upland Farms Marina project. He made the following comments: · The report was a memorandum to the MCWD and was not a research report. It was based in part on years of water sampling by the MCWD beginning in 1969, with sampling locations on Six Mile Creek. He reported that there is a long data history with some of the numbers involved in the memorandum. · The memorandum takes into consideration literature that has addressed the effects of boats on phosphorous concentrations and loading. He focused on phosphorous concentrations because it is the key nutrient for the growth of algae and plants. The primary research in this area was done in Florida in three shallow lakes with outboard'motors. He reviewed the methodology used in this research, noting that these lakes were' separated by barriers and sectioned off to establish control areas, The boats with these outboard motors were driven around the lake and samples were subsequently taken. He reported that there were total phosphorus concentration increases in these lakes from 35 ug/L to 165 ug/L. He stated that the average phosphorous concentration over the last five years for Halsteads Bay is 108 ug/L. · Although the results of this study in Florida were not directly applied in the memorandUm to his evaluation of Halsteads Bay, his thought process was that there were numerous similarities that could be applied to a channel leading into Lake Minnetonka that has similar sediment conditions. The lakes in Flodda were mucky and organic sediment, similar to Six Mile creek, with large quantities of nutrients at the bottom that could be re-suspended. He reviewed two additional studies that were conducted in Massachusetts and Wisconsin. · The memorandum made judgements on the impact to Six Mile Creek after development. Based on the average flow of the two stations on Six Mile Creek, he estimated a 50.ug/L seasonal total increase in phosphorous in Six Mile Creek from 157 ug/L to 207 ug/L. He also estimated an increase in phosphorous loading of 800 pounds per year, from 2,400 pOunds to 3,200 pounds. · The memorandum also made judgements on the impacts to Halsteads Bay after development. He stated that Halsteads Bay ph0SphOmus levels result in part because of the bottom releasing past phosphorus deposit, pdmadly from sewage practices. He estimated an increase in total phosphorous of 10 ug/L from 108 ug/L to 118 ug/L. He estimated a 5 ug/L inCrease in ChlorOphyll,a from 45 ug/L to 50 ug/L. He estimated a 0,1 m reduction in secchi depth readingS from 1.5 rotc 1.4 m. -435- Lake'Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 Page 7 * He concluded that the figures included in the memorandum are a sutnmary of water quality data tabulated as directed by the MCWD. He.entertained comments or questions from the Board on the memorandum. Nybeck stated that staff invited Dr. Erdmann to this meeting because the memorandum had been included in previous Board packets and he believed the Board would benefit from an overview from him on it. Mr. Bruce Malkerson, legal counsel for four property owners on Six Mile Creek, encouraged the Board to grant exemptions for his clients if the Board decides to adopt the proposed ordinance amendment. He state, d that he W~)uld like the Board to continue discussion of the proposed ordinance to a future meeting to allow him to better understand the issues involved. He asked Erdmann to cladfy how many pounds per acre of phosphorous loading results from lawns around the lake. Erdmann stated that on average, pristine land contributes approximately 1/10 of a pound of phosphorous per acre. Developed lots contribute approximately 1/2 to one pound of phosphorous per acre. He noted that these figures could vary greatly. Malkerson stated that review of the maps of Six Mile Creek appear to show thousands of acres that are tributary to Six Mile Creek. He questioned whether it would be practical to have his clients and other residents in the area agree to not to use ferBizer with phosphorous in it, thus reducing the 800 pounds per year of loading estimated for Six Mile Creek. Erdmann stated that elimination of fertilizer with phosphorus in it would not eliminate all sources of phosphorous in developed environments. Babcock stated to a larger extent, urban development in general results in water runoff that reaches the watershed district more quickly and results in greater runoff of phosphorous. Even with fertilizer that is phosphorous free, urban development results in runoff of phosphorous and other nutrients into the watershed district. Erdmann stated grass clippings and leaves from trees are two other sources of phosphorous to the watershed district. Babcock asked Erdmann to address how wetlands operate over time. Specifically, how do they serve as to retain phosphorous and how do they serve in slowing down the introduction of phospho[us into Lake Minnetonka. Erdmann stated that one primary benefit of wetland areas, reduction of nutrients before they reach the lake, are impacted by channels. Prior to the establishment of channels, water n wetland areas would spread out over the entire wetland. The MCWD has conducted projects in the past where water has been dispersed over the entire wetland. Babcock asked Erdmann to comment on the proposed property in Six Mile Creek where watercraft has not historically been used. Erdmann stated that if the channel is kept open for boat traffic, he believed there would be higher concentrations of phosphorous entedng Lake Uinnetonka. MCMiil'an asked for an explanation of how phosphorous is retained in the water tables. -436- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 Page8 Erdmann stated that phosphorous is distinct from carbon and nitrogen because it does not have a gaseous- form in nature that would allow it to leave a water table system, Because of this, the removal of phosphorous is difficult and is rarely feasible in a metropolitan area. MalkerSon stated that he understood that dredging on a large scale is rarely available because of the costs associated with it. Erdmann clarified that dredging, for the removal of phosphorous and other nutrients in metropolitan area lakes, is generally not feasible because of huge volumes of removed'material. Malkerson stated that in Six Mile Creek, the phosphorous and other nutrients generally stay at the base of the creek. He suggested that phosphorous and other nutrients are introduced into Lake Minnetonka in the spring and after significant rainfalls. McMillan stated that she had learned over the years that dredging is not the cure for the removal of phosphorous from the water basins. She believed that there is no cure to remove phosphorous from the tribUtaries identified in the proposed ordinance amendment because of the variables involved and she encouraged the Board to move on with the discussion, Malkerson stated that he understood the comments from McMillan; however, he would like the capability of asking relevant questions prior to the adoption of the proposed ordinance amendment because an expert is providing testimony possibly in support of it. Mr. Tim Hassett, legal counsel for Upland Farms, stated that the development includes NURP ponds. He asked Erdmann if they were included in the memorandum prepared. Erdmann stated the NURP ponds were not included in the memorandum. He explained that NURP ponds are used to decrease phosphorous levels from developed areas. HasSett stated that the memorandum prepared was done specifically on Six Mile Creek, and not Long Lake or Painter's Creek. He asked Erdmann to comment on phosphorous loading and hoW props from motors could impact phosphorous loading on Six Mile and Painter's Creeks. Erdmann stated that both creeks are large sources of phosphorous into Lake Minnetonka. He indicated that he had conducted limited research on the creeks up and beyond this. Hassett asked based on the exhibit in the memorandum, would Painter's Creek carry a higher level of phosphorous that could dissipate into Lake Minnetonka than Six Mile Creek? Erdmann stated both creeks are large sources of phosphorous into Lake Minnetonka; however, Painter's Creek is a larger source. Hassett stated that the concept of flushing phosphorous into Lake Minnetonka has already been discussed. He questioned whether that has been taken into consideration. He suggested that the memorandum has made assumptions in areas on Six Mile Creek and that actUally testing has not taken placel Foster thanked Dr. Erdmann on behalf of the Board. He asked what the pleasure of the Board was. -437- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 Page 9 Babcock stated that the letter prepared by LeFevere makes him believe that grandfathering special privileges for specific properties could be done. LeFevere suggested that the parameters of grandfathering need to be decided by the Board and he believed this discussion should take place at this meeting. Seuntjens stated that he would like a map to clarify the location of the 929,4' NGVD contour lines at the three creeks referenced in the proposed ordinance amendment, although this might require a survey to be conducted. He added that he advocated some form of exclusion from the proposed ordinance amendment for residents with historical use. He suggested that it might be appropriate to alloW these residents the same density requirements that are allowed on Lake Minnetonka. It might be appropriate to have another meeting to discuss the details of the exclusions relating to grandfather or to have the attomey draft these details himself. Babcock stated the responsibility of setting the parameters has been given to LeFevere; however, policy decisions relating to grandfathering is the responsibility of the Board. Seuntjens stated that there might be other areas of Lake Minnetonka in addition to the three tributaries that should be considered in the proposed ordinance amendment. McMillan stated that when the City of Orono worked with the MN DNR on its shoreline ordinancesjn the early 1990's, the part of Long Lake Creek from the railroad trestle north to Browns Road was determined to be part of Lake Tanager, She added that a concern she had with phosphorous in the tributaries is that it involves flowing water that more easily carries phosphorous. The consensus of the Board was to take no action on the proposed ordinance amendment and to discuss the details of grandfathering at the Lake Minnetonka Wetlands Task Fome level, Board members Babcock, Knudsen, McMillan, Seuntjens, and Van Hercke agreed to participate in this discussion and to bring it back to a future meeting. Van Hercke left at 8:53 p.m, The meeting was recessed at 8:53 p,m. and re-convened at 9:05 p.m. B. Update on 11/15/01 Annual Meeting with the Hennepin CoUnty Sheriffs Office Water Patrol. Foster updated the Board on the annual meeting with the Hennepin County Shedffs Water Patrol. He believed that the meeting was productive and he thanked Board members for their excellent attendance. Two issues discussed at this meeting included enforcement of the proposed ordinance amendment that was just discussed and heightened secudty measures because of the 9/11 incident in New York. C. Staff analysis of 2001 Hennepin County Shedffs Water Patrol project. Foster stated that staff had prepared a memo that provided an analysis of the 2001 Water Patrol project. He noted that he would work with staff on the preparation of a letter to be sent out to the member cities in the near future. Babcock stated that he would like the second to the last paragraph in the letter from Lt. Bdan Johnson, dated12/4/01, amended. Specifically, he believed the last sentence in this paragraph could be misleading and it should be clarified. -438- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board ~eeting December 12, 2001 D, Chair update of the 2002 Lake Minnetonka Boat Use Study. Page 10 Foster stated that he recently met with Tim Kelly from the MN DNR to discuss the 2002 Lake Minnetonka Boat Use Study, A "Boating Trends on Lake Minnetonka, 1984-2000" is currently being finalized by the MN DNR and Kelly has reported there have not been significant changes to the data over the years. Kelly has recommended that the duration between these management plan projects be increased to every four years. Foster stated that he believed a more comprehensive study could possibly be done every four years and he stated that he endorsed it, He concluded that Kelly would be present at the 1/9/02 Regular Board Meeting to discuss this and the historical report being prepared by the MN DNR, Babcock stated that he would prefer an active boat count be conducted every two years with a use attitude survey conducted every fourth year, He believed continuing to conduct these surveys as they have been historically been done because it establishes more data points from a statistical standpoint. F. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 2. SAVE THE LAKE A. Consideration of 2001 Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol Special Deputy Candidates. MOTION: McMillan moved, Gilman seconded to honor Brian Hubbard as the 2001 Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol Special Deputy of the Year. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. Additional Business. McMillan stated that the third solicitation letter has recently be prepared and sent out, 3. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (11/16/01 - 11/30/01) & (12/1/01 - 12/15/01), Nybeck reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted, MOTION: Gilman moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Additional Business. NybeCk stated that Treasurer Skramstad would like to make changes to the financial summary Sheet in 2002. Specifically, he would change the balance so that it more accurately reflects when revenues are received and when expenses are incurred on a monthly basis. 4, ADMINISTRATION There was no discussion, -439- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 12, 2001 5. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE Page 11 Suerth stated that the second zebra mussel stakeholders meeting was scheduled for Thursday, 12/13/01, at 7 p.m. at Deephaven City Hall, 6. WATER STRUCTURES There was no discussion. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Nybeck reported on the following: · Two newspaper articles were included in the handout folders that addressed the purchase of Grays Bay Madna. Another newspaper article was included in the handout folders that discussed the LMA. · He attended the 12/1/01 Hennepin County Shedff Office Water Patrol Special Deputy Banquet Dinner at the Bloomington Radisson. He suggested that he planned on attending this annual event in the future and that a Board representative(s) might also want to attend, · A copy of the monthly Executive Director Report that summarized Distdct staff activities was included in the handout folders. · The search for the vacant Administrative Secretary position is on-going, 8. OLD BUSINESS Foster updated the Board on the letter prepared by the City of Minnetonka that evaluated funding formulas for the District. He noted that they concluded that the existing formula was fair at this time based on their research. 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -440- Peter Meyer 5748 Sunset Road Mound, MN 55364 952-472-7449 January 14, 2002 City of Mound C/o Kandis Hanson, City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 It is my intent to do a fundraiser with the proceeds to go toward the lifeguard program and the senior center. This fundraiser will not take place on City property. The proceeds will be forwarded to the City of Mound who will act as the fiscal agent. I am holding myself responsible and liable for anything that would happen to me and/or to others, to my property or to others' property during the fundraiser or by actions related to the fundraiser referred to above. The City of Mound is not intended to be party to the fundraiser. The only involvement of the City on the fundraiser is to be the fiscal agent for any proceeds that I will forward to it. Sincerely, Peter Meyer -441 - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life Gray Freshwater Center Hwys. 15 & 19, Navarre Mail: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331-9578 Phone: (952) 471-0590 Fax: (952) 471-0682 Email: admin @ minnehahacreek.org Web Site: www. minnehahacreek.org Board of Managers Pamela G. Blixt James Calkins Lance Fisher Monica Gross Scott Thomas Malcolm Reid Robert Schroeder FROM: TO: RE: DATE: MEMORANDUM Jim Hafner, Senior District Technician Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Cities and Townships within the Watershed Proposed Stream, Lake and'Wetland Buffer Rule .January 9, 2002 In March 2001, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) provided to you a copy of a proposed MCWD rule requiring the establishment of vegetated buffers adjacent to certain categories of streams, lakes and wetlands within the watershed. A public hearing was held and comments were received. Since then, the MCWD has continued to engage in research and discussion, and the MCWD Board of Managers has revised the proposed rule in a number of respects. The Board of Managers expects within the next several weeks to approve a revised proposed rule for publication and a second 30-day public comment period and hearing. You will receive a copy of the proposed rule and the documents on which the rule is based will be available for your review. Tnformation about the rulemaking also will continue to be found on our web site at www.minnehahacreek.org. We encourage you to prepare to receive the rule document and to participate in the public comment process as you believe appropriate. In light of the extensive rulemaking process to date, the Board will not be inclined to further extend the comment period short of any substantial unexpected issues that may arise. The rule will propose buffers of 25 to 50 feet, in which structures, hard surface, filling, excavating and vegetative disturbance will be limited. Buffer averaging is proposed for compliance flexibility. :In addition, the Board is exploring the option of a comprehensive riparian management plan as a performance-based alternative to full buffer width. The rule contains a number of full or partial exceptions applicable to preexisting structures and hard surface, single-family parcels, public utilities, stormwater facilities and others. The proposed rule also specifies temporary construction-phase buffers and imposes peak-flow-based restrictions on point source discharges to streams, lakes and wetlands. We invite you to review the rulemaking documents carefully once they are available, and to provide the MCWD with the benefit of your insights and information. If you have nay questions please contact me at 952-471-0590 or jhafner@minnehahacreek.org. Printed on recycled paper containing at ,east 30% post consumer waste. - 442 - Delano Eagle~k ,~ ~l~ ~[_ ~ Page 9 of 45 "We didn't come work and the result of that is §hakopee really took it to us," grown said. "We realized we have to show up and play hard every period in every game or else we will have a tough time." Previously, the Tigers participated in the Eau Claire North Hol}day Tournament De~n~. Ijtl~he first game, Delano played Eau Claire East and lost 4-2. Tiger goals were scored by Ed Kru~i~r aj~sted by Dusty Littlefield and Scott Rakos, and by Derek McElroy assisted bY Cole Mathisen and Grat~ Barrel. John Meegan played in goal for Delano and had 16 saves on 20'shots. The Tigers had made 30 shots on Eau Claire's goal. "We played well. We outplayed them but we were not putting the puck into the net," Brown said. The Tigers then played Verona, which was the No. 3 rated team in Wisconsin. Delano was down 2-0 after the first period, but came back to make it 2-1 on a goal scored by Littlefield assisted by Krueger. Verona scored twice more to go ahead 4-1, but the Tigers came out strong in the third period and Nagorski was able to score a power play goal with an assist by Scott Rakos. However, with a minute and a half left to play, Verona netted two quick goals to finish the game 6-2. "We played a real strong game against them," Brown said. Meegan played in goal and had 26 saves on 32 shots. "I'm pleased with our efforts in the holiday tournament. We played some big schools with big hockey traditions," Brown said. Brown said some of these schools are graduating 400 to 500 students in a class adding that he was proud th~ii the Tigers were able to play so well against these large schools. The Tigers also played Monticello Friday, Dec. 21, and lost 4-2. Tiger goals came from Jason Splett and Littlefield with assists by Krueger and Petroski. The next games for Tigers will be Tuesday, Jan. 8, at 7:45 p.m. versus Becker in Elk River and Friday, Jan. 11, at home against Princeton at 7:30 p.m. by Kevin Gerard Moe The Delano City Council decided to raise its utility fees to keep pace with rising operating costs and expenses. The council decided to raise the sewer access charge (SAC) to $3,700 and the trunk charge to $2,200. Also at its Wednesday, Jan. 2, meeting, the council made appointments"for the new year, approved a lease agreement for a pull-tab machine and authorized applying for twc~ grants. http://www, pressnews.com/eagle.htrnl - 443- 1/15/2002 Delano Eagle" Page 10 of 45 UTILITY FEES Utility hook up fees are charged to new or expanding buildings for residential, commercial or industrial use. City administrator Phil Kern said the charges are used to pay for the city's infrastructure. However, with the expansion of the city and the need to upgrade the wastewater treatment facility, these charges needed to be raised to keep up with rising costs. Kern said it has been the city's policy to welcome new businesses in, but they should pay for themselves and not be subsidized by other residents. Therefore, Kern recommended the city raise the SAC fee from $2,003 to $3,700 and the trunk charge from $1,213 to $2,200. In addition, these fees will be increased 3% each year to keep up with inflation. User charges will be increased at a rate of 2.5%. Kern referenced SAC fees in neighboring cities and said that Delano's increase would be right in line with them. In St. Michael, the fee is $3,935, in Monticello it is $3,100, in Buffalo it is $3,700 and in Rockford it is $3,500. The council ended up approving the increase, which will be effective Feb. 1, in order for people with building permits in process can have them approved before the change takes effect. If they do so, they have until March 1 to pay the fees in order to be eligible for the old rate. PULL-TAB MACHINE The council also approved a lease agreement with the Delano Fire Relief Association to have a pull-tab machine at Delano Wine & Spirits. Kern said this would be the first pull-tab vending machine in a municipal liquor store in the state. Because of this, there are no revenue projections for how much money the machine will take in. Therefore, the rental fee charged to the Delano Fire Relief Association will be $1 per month for the first three months in order to establish the profits of the machine. In April, the lease amount will be re- negotiated. APPOINTMENTS Becaus~ it was the first mgeting of the new year, the council spent some time getting things in order for 2002. Several appointments were made to city advisory boards, commissions and council subcommittees. Rhonda Painschab and Steve Stahlke were appointed to the planning commission, Jon Steinmetz, Mary Emery and Joe Schleper were appointed to the park and recreation commission, Joe McDonald was appointed to the public safety task force and Larry Barrels was appointed to the water, light and power commission. The council also authorized city staff to petition to have the water, light and power commission increased from three members to five due to the fact that Delano's utility capacity is growing along with the city. An increase in commission members must be approved by the state. http://www.pressnews.com/eagle.html -444- 1/15/20~ Delano Eagle Page 37 of 45 The proposal was reviewed by city staff, which found it to be located in the city's designated growth area and consistent with land use designations on an Extra Territorial Land Use Plan. After discussion, the council decided to approve the preliminary annexation request and to instruct staff to begin orderly annexation procedures with Franklin Township. Staff will bring this issue back before council when township negotiations are completed. ZOO BAR As an added item to the agenda, the council approved by resolution the permanent closing of the Zoo Bar. During work sessions back in May and July, the council began pondering what was to be done with the bar as it was becoming clear that the city hall building very probably needed to be replaced. After much discussion, the council finally decided that the best solution was to close the bar permanently. This decision was based partly on the fact that the municipal store to liquor is moving Delano Crossings and because the bar has not turned much profit in two anda-half years. nald's restaurant, through Oppidan Development Corporation (which is the responsible party within the development agreement), was requesting that the council revisit its sewer and water access charges (SAC and WAC) for the Delano Crossings Development. The restaurant believed it should be rebated 5.94 SAC and WAC units, or $11,612 and $13,068, respectively. Delano has classified McDonald's as a "drive-in" restaurant, which resulted in 8.6 SAC/WAC units being assigned to the establishment. However, the business maintains that it should be designated a "fast food" restaurant, which would result in it being assigned less than three SAC/WAC units. The council was told that it has been city staff's position that correct fees were originally calculated and that the city and Oppidan agreed to a number of things in the development agreement, one of which was utility fees. Both parties at the time agreed that the charges were correct. Therefore, staff had not changed its position on the utility calculations. The council ended up denying the request to reconsider the SAC/WAC calculation. ENVIRONMENT STUDY A draft of an environmental report done on the property owned by the State Bank of Delano was also reviewed by the council, acting as the economic development authority (EDA). The city is currently in the process of purchasing the property, located on Railroad Ave., to be the new home for the Delano Public Library. http://www.pressnews.com/eagle.html -445- 1/15/2002 Page 1 of 1 Kandis M. Hanson From: To: Sent: Subject: "Orv Burma" <orv.burma@technagraphics.com> "Kandis Hanson" <kandishanson@cityofmound.com> Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:28 AM Contact numbers Kandis- I received your letter confirming my appointment as Mound's representative to the LMCD. It would seem important that the City Council, the Mayor, and you have my contact numbers in order to easily communicate on LMCD related issues important to the City. Please feel free to distribute the following numbers to the Council members, the Mayor and anyone else that you feel would have need to contact me regarding the functioning of the LMCD (or any other matter). Day phone (952) 653-0001 Evening phone (952) 472-3989 Cell phone (612) 860-2294 Day emaih orv.burma@technagraphics.com Home email: orvburma@aol.com Thanks, Orv -446- 01/17/2002 J J I~e Jl RII[ I) I III Ill I i II lltJ Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Agenda -January 18, 2002 7:15 - 9:00 a.m. Mound City Hall 1. Social - Coffee, tea, rolls, fruit and juice start at 7:15 2. Introductions 7:30 3. 'Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes 4. 'Announcements (10 min.) 5.Annual Report and Evaluation (30 min.) We will have copies of the Annual Report for every one! (and your friends) We will also have a discussion about what we have accomplished and where we go from here. 6. The Housing Challenge Game (30 min.) Marcy Harris will show us how to play this educational game. "We change, whether we like it or not." Ralph Waldo Emerson Any comments or questions, call Leah Weycker, Collaborative Coordinator, at 952-491-8058 or WeyckerL @ westonka.k 12. mn.us -447- Work Group Updates Health Sandy Olstad, Laurie Fitz, Mary GOode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke The Health Group's Depression Awareness task force planned on starting a community wide distribu- tion of the suicide awareness cards. Let them know about any good locations where people would have access to the cards. Youth Activities Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Patsy Kiesow The skatepark task force needs help getting the word out about fundraising and inkind donations. They wrote an article for the newspaper and will start being very "public" about this project. Parenting Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Bill EriCkson We received the Allies for Change grant involving Parent Mobilization. The grant is for designing and maintaining a web site and a parent newsletter for middle and high school families. Pass on any ideas. Community Margaret Holste, Cathy Bailey, Cheryl Fischer This group has not met. Communications Anne Wilbur, Carol Olson The annual report is done and printed. We will hand out copies at the meeting and discuss all the progress we made. The skate park donor packet is being finalized now. ~ Finance and Operations Mary Hughes, Len Harrell, Margaret Holste, Craig Anderson This group has not needed to meet. Executive Craig Anderson, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer~ The Executive Group did not need to meet. Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County Primary Project .is moving ahead. FourChild Associates were hired and we ail went to .two days of training in Hopkins. We plan on serving children in pre-school and one or two classes of the K-3rd grades. Leah will act as the overall project, coordinator. -448- Westonka Health Community Collaborative Minutes - November 16, 2001 Present: Craig Anderson, Kathy Jones, Marcy Harris (CASH), Sandy Rauschendorfer, Deb Truesdell (Hennepin County Rep.), Jeanette Metz, Patsy Kiesow, Sandy Wing, Mary Goode, Margaret Holste, Leah Weycker, and Gene .Hostetler, Guest 1. Additions or Changes to the Agenda or Minutes: There were no additions or changes to the agenda. Sandy Rauschendorfer moved and Deb Truesdell seconded the approval of the minutes from September and October. Motion passed. 2. Announcements: · Planning continues for the Primary Project which will likely be offered pre-K through grade two beginning second semester. We are looking for two' part-time persons (approximately 12 hours per week) to hire as child associates. · The $13,000 Allies for Change grant is being written to include the design and maintenance of a website to serve as a "family service center on the web" and a parent newsletter geared toward "older" kids. Please share information that could be included in the newsletter, preferably "short ' pieces", with Kathy Jones or a member of the parenting work group. · Members were asked to update the mailing list and add e-mail addresses, if available. · Kathy Jones announced that the chemically free student group called "FREE" is helping with Chemical Health Week. They are also holding an event at the St. John's Harbor this Friday and will sponsor more if it is "successful". · Marcy Harris shared CASH brochures and magnets describing the services CASH provides. She also shared materials developed as a joint effort of 10 groups who are concerned about housing issues. Housing Challenge, in comic book format, and a game have been developed and are available from Marcy. They focus on tenant rights as well as how to obtain and maintain housing. 3. Nominations for Chair and Vice Chair: Sandy Rauschendorfer has offered to continue as Vice Chair. No one has been found yet to serve as Chair, but Craig Anderson will continue to ask people. Please consider saying "yes" when he approaches you. 4. Zero Gravity Skate Park Update: Gene Hostetler shared the design for the Skate Park as well as a detailed budget for the "complete plan" with everything paid ($162,267). The plan could be done in phases, e.g. adding the paved parking lot at a later time. We are hopeful of getting donations of'materials and labor in addition to monetary donations. The city will serve as fiscal agent for this project and receipts will be available for donations of time and materials. We have a consultant who's a pool builder who worked with the YMCA and has experience pulling together volunteer help. It was suggested that we contact labor unions for donation of skilled labor. We'll also recruit local youth to help and will ask the Alliance how to access persons required to do community service hours. Sandy shared that the Task force is meeting regularly and will meet again on 11/28/01 at 5:30 p.m. at the Westonka Library to work on a donor packet. -449- She invited us to attend or share our ideas. They plan to develop a brochure itemizing needs and are working on a way to recognize donors. VarioUs fundraising ideas were discussed including having the kids develop a video, having businesses donate a portion of their proceeds for a period of time, sharing information in the Laker on a regular basis, posting a "barometer" to give residents regular updates on our progress,, contacting .retired male executives who might resonate with the idea. Gene plans to develop a 3-D model which could be used as part of these efforts. The task force hopes to have all the plans in place so that we can "dig" when the frost goes out in the Spring, 2002. Isn't that good news!!! 5. Student Survey Data: Kathy Jones shared results of the the survey completed last spring by students in grades 6, 9 and 12. This survey has been done every three years since 1989. Parents are notified in advance, and although participation is voluntary, almost 100% of our students do so. Kathy also believes the stUdents are truthful in their reSponses as they appreciate the opportunity to share their opinions and experiences. State results and trends will be available later. The "snap shot" of Westonka that Kathy shared includes: · The vast majority of our students report that they like school (70%), and they feel safe in school. · 95% of students report that they believe their parents care about them. 74% believe that adults in the schools care about them. · Tobacco use has declined. · Alcohol use is on the decline, but still high. · Marijuana use has gone down especially in the lower grades, but is still high. · There' has been a reduction in sexual behavior. · Being a victim or witness to family violence was reported as being true for 20-30% of those surveyed. · FamilY drug/alcohol use was a problem for roughly 20% of students. · Students that reported having ever attempted suicide remained about the same with an average 10-20% of females and 4-7% of males reporting an attemPt. School staff are available to share this information with community groups. Minnetrista police and. school staff are planning to do a "summit" for the community once statewide trend data are available.' It was suggested that the ministerial group and the church youth workers are important audiences. There is no WHCC meeting in December. We will.meet again on January 18, 2002. Leah. asked that everyone invite another person to join us. Patsy Kiesow.moved to adjourn, seconded by Marcy. Motion passed. Margaret Holste, Recorder -450- Yes, confirm my reservation for the Thirty-fifth Anniversary "S AVE T H E L A K E" Recognition Banquet, Thursday, February 7, 2002. My check (payable to LMCD Save the Lake) is enclosed for persons at $35.00 each, total $. NAME ORGANIZATION Remm to arrive by January 31 to: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 Minnetonka Blvd., Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (952) 745-0789 -451 - Page 1 of 5 Kandis M. Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12. mn. us> Friday, January 11, 2002 2:25 PM westonka.news westonka, news Vol. 2, No. 15 January 11, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN 55364; http://www.westonka.k12.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten@westonka.k12, mn. us. Contents 1. News Briefs --Why Wasn't Westonka Included in Star Tribune Budget Cuts Article? --Alternative Learning Center Task Force Update 2. Focus Topic: School Board News 3. Upcoming Events 4. Tell Us What You Think NEWS BRIEFS **Why Wasn't Westonka Included in Star Tribune Budget Cuts Article?** The Westonka School District was missing from the Star Tribune's January 9 front page article, "Metro school districts project $100 million in total deficits," which listed about a dozen metro school districts that will be making significant budget cuts for the coming school year. The press conference which led to the Star Tribune article was sponsored by the Association of Metropolitan School Districts (AMSD), a -452- 01/14/2002 Page 2 of 5 consortium of school districts advocating for state education policy that improves student learning. The press conference featured the 27 AMSD member districts, which include most of Westonka's neighboring school districts. Why didn't Westonka make the list? In short: money. It costs approximately $10,000 per year to belong to AMSD, and while it is an organization that provides great service to its members, it's · simply beyond the financial reach (and has been for more than 10 years) of Westonka. **Alternative Education Task Force Update** The Alternative Learning Center/School Within a School Task Force, co-chaired by principals Kevin Borg and Gene Zulk, is charged with considering the cost reductions that could occur if alternative learning centers were to be organized at both Grandview Middle School and Mound Westonka High School. Offering alternative education within the district could save about $50,000 in tuition paid to other districts that serve Westonka students whose needs cannot be met within the local district. While an "in-house" alternative education program is expected to save money, the primary reason for considering it is because it's good for kids. Even if the school district were not experiencing budget shortfalls, administrators would still be considering a local alternative program simply because of its educational benefits for students. Issues to consider include logistics, classroom instruction, and student mental health support. The task force will review options and create a summary to submit to the school board no later than Feb. 1. At its initial meetings, task force members reviewed background information on tuition costs, program design, space, students, and staffing. Questions for further research: --what is the funding implication for organizing a "school within a school" instead of a traditional, co-sponsored "area learning center"? --How many students would need to be enrolled in order for the school district to be able to afford appropriate staffing levels? FOCUS TOPIC -453- 01/14/2002 Page 3 of 5 **School Board News** At its organizational meeting on January 14, the Westonka School Board will swear in new members and elect officers. Newly elected member is Chuck Walerius; re-elected incumbents are Bob Bittle and J. Ned Dow. Continuing school board members are David Botts, Roger Bredeson, Bruce Charon, and John Johns. Former school board chair, Bill Pinegar, retired from the board in December after ten years of distinguished service. During the regular meeting, the board will consider action on the following: --approve construction documents and budget estimate, and authorize the administration to bid all plans and specifications for the Educational Service Center/Haddorff Field project --approve a five-year lease agreement between the Mound Westonka Hockey Association and the Westonka Public Schools. The lease gives the Mound Westonka Hockey Association the right to construct and use a warming house and skating rink next to Shirley Hills Primary School. All construction, utility, and maintenance costs will be paid by the Mound Westonka Hockey Association. The School District will provide property casualty and liability insurance as part of its overall insurance package. --a statement of support for the Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative as it initiates the Westonka Suicide Prevention Program. --first reading of several administrative policy updates The Focus Topic of the board meeting will be a report from staff of Decision Resources, Ltd, who will share the results of a community survey regarding why voters did not support last November's operating levy referendum. The school board will hold its organizational meeting starting at 7 p.m.; the regular meeting will take place at 7:30 p.m. Location: Shirley Hills Primary School, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound. School board minutes from the previous month are posted online at http://www.westonka, k12.mn.us/who/board, html. UPCOMING EVENTS --January 14, Superintendent's Roundtable, an informal opportunity to get your questions answered by Supt. Pam Myers, 5 p.m., Room 200, Shirley Hills Primary School --January 14, School Board organizational meeting, 7 p.m.; regular meeting 7:30 p.m. Shirley Hills Primary School --January 15, Shirley Hills PTA Pizza Party, 5:30 p.m. -454- 01/14/2002 Page 4 of 5 --January 15, Community Education Advisory Council, 7 p.m., Shirley Hills Primary --January 15, Parent Night for incoming 8th graders next fall, 7 p.m., Mound Westonka High School --January 15, 7 p.m., Hilltop PTA meeting --January 16, Overview of Budget Task Force Discussions, an evening opportunity for those who can't attend the late afternoon task force meetings, led by Supt. Para Myers, 7-8:30 p.m., Room 200, Shirley Hills Primary School --January 16, Financial Aid Night, 7 p.m., Little Theater, Mound Westonka High School --January 21, Dr. Martin Luther King Day, No School E-12 ["E-12" stands for "Early Childhood through Grade 12"] Home Athletic Competitions: --January 12, Verne Gagne Wrestling Invitational, 9 a.m., Mound Westonka High School --January 15, Boys Basketball vs. St. Bernard's: Gr. 9, 4:30 p.m.; Gr. 10, 6 p.m.; Varsity, 7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High School --January 17, Girls Basketball vs. Brooklyn Center: Gr. 9, 4:30 p.m.; JV, 6 p.m., V, 7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High School --January 18, Wrestling vs. Brooklyn Center, V, 5 p.m., Mound Westonka High School TELL US WHAT YOU THINK! We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. Use whichever way works best for you: send an e-mail message to <welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us>; call the District Feedback Line at 952.491.8260; or mail your comments to Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us> It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 -455- 01/14/2002 Page 5 of 5 welisten@westonka, kl 2. mn. us http://www.westonka.k12.mn.us westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. The State of Minnesota has determined that the subscriber list for this newsletter is public data. -456- 01/14/2002 Page 1 of 1 Kandis M. Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12. mn. us> Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:33 AM correction to westonka.news calendar item for tonight Please note: The Parent Night listing in last week's issue of westonka.news should read as follows: Grade 8 Parent Night, **for parents of students currently in 8th grade and moving into 9th grade next fall**, will be held tonight, Tuesday, January 15, at 7 p.m. in the Little Theater at Mound Westonka High School. The editor apologizes for any confusion. Barbara Olson Community Relations Coordinator Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Blvd, Suite A Mound MN 55364 p: 952.491.8006 f: 952.491.8043 e-mail: olsonb@westonka.kl2.mn.us We know your child by name... We help your child achieve. -457- 01/15/2002 State of the ,Twin How far How fir the region has come, where · is todz)~ and what's needed tO build on its sucCeSSes were thc themes of a. State of the Regibn a'fl~ by Meix0~folitan~ Council Chair Ted Mondale Dec. 12. He wa~ joined by Gov. Jesse Ventura, Maplewood Mayor Bob Cardinal and a pane,'of mayors ~nd citizen lctivists in Maplewood near Hillcrest Village, one of fix %ppor~:unity site~" in the Smart Growth Twin Cities hfitiarive. Gov. Venrata said the Council has taken on "a tough regional agenda" and is making progress in commuting choic- es, affordable housing that supports workers and businesses, and redevelop- . merit of older communities. Mundale said con~ary to cgnvenrional wisdtm a dec~le ago, who would haye thought suburbs like St. Louis Park, . Chaske and Burnsville would be experi- coring a renaissance because of r~evel- opment tools like the Livable Communities Act. The cleanup of 700 acres of pollured land in the l~st five p~ars, he said, has led to a resurgence of opic moving back to St. Paul and Minneapolis to live downtown and dose to the Mississippi. Mondale said outlines of a new strate- .gy eau for the region to: : sit - Organizing housing, shopping and jobs around tram'portarion corridors. · Build more'affordable housing, espe- dally near suburban job centers. · Preserve environmental resom~es while accommodating fu!ure · Target investments in older dries. For 2002, Mondale oiled these goals for thc region: · Create a growth strategy that inte- grate~ housing,-transportarion, devel- . opment and environmental protection. · Bifiki an inventory decide wh~t to protect and how to · integrate .it.with ~upponed growth. · Build a regional action plan - the .~/uqv/nt 2030 - to enhance economic growth, build Commtmifies and protect the environment. Find his speech, and a summary. grants below, ar. Also, Mondale announced $10.1 mil- lion in Smxrt Grow~ investments for 2002. · $ I. million to Blo~mingron, Bumsville, Coon Rapids, South St. Paul, West St, Paul, Shoreview and'Woodbury for ' affordable hogsing ~s. '· $7.5 million'for Brooklyn Park, Chas~a, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Louis Park and St. Paul for develop- ment and rexievdopment initiatives that incoq~or~te mixed-use develop- ment and ale transit-' and pedestrian- · $500,000 to ~moka,,Apple Valley, Blaine, Bumsville, Dayton, Exealsioz, Hastings, Rosemount, Rnseville'and St:Paul to support project~ in thc pre- development · $I.1 million to promote improved rater quality in the r~gion's lakes, rive~ and streams. KANDIS HANSON CITY OF' MOUND 5341 MAY'WOOD RD MOUND MN 5536'4-1627 Id,h,hh-II-lh-l-h,, Ihll;h.hlk,, M,,h.lhlh,I E,C t O' future ~ESORTED STANDAg, I) U.S. POSTAGE PAID MINNEAPOLIS, MN P~lt M1T NO. 1610 ~ TranSit'sfuturb: double capacity, develop exclu- sive transitways, foster ' Smart Growth in transit corridors l~tt it won? stm. ~ ist noat~y areas ~isgmao, t ~ov, qlo would Itave Edina and ~ crucial to thor f~ure? woncis#ul ~lanning process .nC, enter I an eyesore right now. Yet it is the Twin. Giries agion mobile, hr- able and economically competitive w~ get toy!gher. Solutions call for smart:tnn~l~ortanon and land use decifions.;A big p~xt of the Wans~t solution are bnswayt Fast~.r than .i:;i:~,ditiqnal:.bus ~erv~ce; less eXpen- - ~: ~ tl~tm light-fall - busways ave ~ thg'le,~ling edg~ of& growing .[:..~b4on~ltranalt network. ' · i. i. :; In ]%vember'the Metropolitan Council green-lighted the Riverv!cw Corridor trinsit projea. The original plan was a separate bus-only roadway fi'om downtown St. ?xul to the Mall of America. However..residents wanted the hnpioved ~ranait service but not another medway through their .neighborhood. ;i~lY l~nesT0n existing s~ !!: ~fls~ p~0raises a fast rid~ - thanks :;to signal prioritization, off-board '. fiu~ ~ollectiun and llmited-~top · service,The line also will extend · ~art downtown to M~plewood. : ~ s~-ving East Si& redevelop- ment sim. Interim bus service improvements are set.for M~Ch. By 20{~, the ~orridor will ~erve m. ughly 23 stations along its ~l- Congestion is mounting in the Northwest Co~idur, a booming area that expects ~0 percent gs'owth in the next two decade,. A future buswey would connect Minneapolis.with Rogen, running Council'wants to integrate high- way r~c~ustrucrioo with a major · t~m~ie.f~c~ty., i . - Hennepin County has commit- ted $27 million toward the Northwe*t Corridor project. Thc co~nty~ ~ang with partners, from market study for reg~m!s ttsnslt growlh in the aext 25 :~a Mettopo]/tan Council .--~----~-~~ DIRECTIONS, Officials gathered Oec. 10 to drive the first spike of the Hiawatha. Light-Rail Trandt ProjecL Rail that Ch~ Tr~wme touts Twin'cities' affordable hou~ng mmeess In the subt~tm. QtJng the reglofl's sccompllshmmtts in affordable housing in . with Io~s. erupt. T~ey are a No~ihwest Corrido~ busway, Ous rs~uested reglmia] parks bonding off behalf of ~ www.mOtmc~l.org/dtfac~mts/bondlng.h~ Would mffe from a ~,,n,~.i~d Blact< Dog Am~hltheator in Burn,lie have a subs~laJ mpolita~ signiflcince" of the aT~llitheMer Dec: 26. Minfleaoto Ufe In St. Pm~ and Luflmran Brotheflmod in Mlffne~polla'woa the ComlmJtm' ly by the MetTAOOlltofl Couflcif's Metro Commuter '. PUBLICATIONS · samma~7 of Rural Ism~s Workshop ~ ~ $15. Check Directions anline: www. metnJcouncll.org Subs(~ribe to monthly emall Dlfec#ons: dato.center~metr, stato,mn.us i ~nOmy.:~o'thiS ~s oneof:t% best pla~ Winter 2001 Published by the Hennepin Conservation District Volume 12 Number 2 From the Hennepin COnservation District Board Chair' I want to begin by saying thank you to the, more than 90 indiViduals, cities, and govern- ment organizations that wrote to our county commissioners expressing support for the work of the Hermepin Conservation District (HCD). It is' trU~ ly gra~ying to have conprmed what we alreadY kneW; that we have e~xcellent partner- ships in the community and are having a positive impact on the people and natural resources of Hennepin County. As many of you may know, the Hennepin County commissioners passed a resolution in' late. October which gives HCD 25% of our 2002 budget request with the .remaining 75% held in a contingency fund pending review by county staff in early March. The resolution seeks to put restrictions on how HCD uses county funds on legal matters and requests that HCD become a part of Hennepin County govern- ment in some fashion. Our commitment is to the conservation of natural resources in the County and develop- ing a structure which delivers conservation in the most effiCient and effective means pos- sible. I feel that W-e have one o£.the .most dediCated and talented Staffs in the MetrOpoli~ tan area (as you will. see in reading this news- letter) and we will be working with the Hennepin County commissioners and staff to ensure that HCD's services are not lost. Your ideas and support are most welcome so please feel free to contact me if you have any thoughts.' You can ematl me at:-KJOHNSON@nh.cc.mn.us or call :at (763) 493-0529. Thanks again for all your support and we look forward to continuing the successes of HCD. Happy Holidays, Katen fohnson, Chair Wetland Health Evaluation Project Has Successful Season The summer of 2001 was the inaugural season for the Wetland Health Evaluation Project (WHEP) in Hennepin County. Volun- teers collected and analyzed plant and macroinvertebrate 'communities in order to assess the biological qualities of this i,Valuable resource. :This program has been {aking place in DakOta County for'four years' and with the financial help of the Minnehaha Creek'Water- shed District and an EPA Region V Environ- mental Education Grant, HCD supported three teams of volunteers that monitored 14 wet- lands around the county. Volunteers in the program received training in wetland plant and macroinvertebrate identification from ex- perts at the Minnesota Pollution ControlAgency and ..then were given hip boots and nets to explore wetland life up close. WHEP volunteers collect macroinvertebrates at a wetland in Medina; Wetland Health continued onpage 2, Hennepin Conservation District -460- New Partnerships for. HCD Wetland Health continued from page 1. In the past few months, HCD has been asked to join a number of innovative partner- ships across the metropolitan area. Among these: 1) The Metropolitan Council has asked a team of consultants, of which HCD is a part, to reView their current policies and make sugges- tions regarding natural resource conservation and growth management in the rural areas of our communities. This consulting team will help to guide Metropolitan Council's Blueprint 2030 project that will redefine the Council's role. in fmmulating goals and strategies for growth management. 2) In a bit a role reversal,, HCD has been hired ~by the national non-profit conservation organization, the Trust for pUblic Land, to serve as their consultant in developing strate- gies for assisting .metropolitan communities with land and water conservation issues. The Trust for Public Land is a non-advocacy orga- nization that assists local, state and national government agencies with the protection of important natural assets. We are proud of this groundbrealdng partnership which combines the strengths of the private and public sectors. 3) The Shingle Creek and West MiSsis- sippi Watershed Management Organizations have hired HCD to serve as their advisor in developing their, second-generation watershed management .plans, This partnership demon- strates that HCD'S expertise can be applied in urban as well as rural settings. 4) HCD's district manager, Steve Hobbs, has been asked to serve on a statewide panel that will be creating the State' Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). This is a five-year plan that is a requirement of the National Park Service to receive federal funds for conservation and outdoor recreation pur- poses from the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). SCORP will set the themes and guidelines for how local and state agencies will work with each other toward a holistic plan for the preservation of our state's rich natural history. The data cOllected by the volunteers will be used to help determine which wetlands are ecologically valuable and help track how wet- lands respond to landscape changes over time. Several of the wetlands monitored by volun- teers are recent restoration projects pursued by the Watershed district or private landown- ers. WHEP is tracldng the success of these restorations by monitoring the plants and macroinvertebrates that use these sites for habitat. Other sites are located in rapidly deVeloPing areas and the data will be used to determine ff wetland protection and~storm water control measures are adeqUately main- taining the quality of these sensitive wetlands. HCD plans to expand the WHEP program next year, In 2001, the three teams of volun- teers, monitored wetlands in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed. These three teams will continue in 2002 and teams will be added in the cities of Bloomington, Minnetonka, and Plymouth. If you are interested in volunteer- lng for the program or viewing the data, please contact HCD. WHEP volunteers learn plant identification at MPCA training Henne£in Conservation District -461 - HCD Completes 6th Season of River Monitoring and Stewardship Approximately 1,000 students and volunteers collected macroinvertebrates and assessed habitat quality at 24 stream sites, around Hennepin County during '200'1 as part of HCD's River Watch program. Many of these sites have been monitored since 1995 and this continuous data set is becoming a valuable record of stream qUality. Thank you to the Elm. Pioneer/Sarah, Nine Mile, Pux:gatory-Bluff, Minnehaha, Shingle-West Mississippi, and Bassett Creek Watershed Commissions for their financial support of the program and to all the teachers for their efforts to make this a successful program. Look for 2001 Annual Report in January. St. Michael/Albertville students monitor the Crow River. River Watch volunteers also completed several more stewardship projects during the past summer. Park Center teacher Cindy Jahnke and her summer school students completed a native planting along Shingle Creek in Brooklyn Park. The riparian restoration will improve habitat, reduce non-point source pollution from the schoolyard and reduce lawn maintenance. Benilde St. Margaret students planted bull-rushes, sedges, asters and other native wetland plants around a storm water holding wetland that is part of a school expansion. This project is an excellent examPle~°f shore-land landscaping, and will be a very visible demonstration site for homeowners interested in wetland or "lakescaping'. In addition, Sarah Hruby, a University of MN student and graduate of Benilde St. Margaret's River Watch Program, completed a study comparing the macroinvertebrate data with other stream char- acteristics at all of the monitoring sKes in the Elm Creek Watershed. Her research indicates a predictable correlation between the biologi- cal data and several Physical and chemical characteristics. Thanks to 'the MetroPblitan coUncil's Water 'Qua~lity ,Initiative for f.[~nding Students plant native shrubs along Shingle Creek. these projects. Rockford High School students at Pioneer Creek. Hennepin Conservation 'District -462- Rain 'Garden Projects This 'fall one of the River Watch students at El' Colegio Charter School looked out at the parking lot north of their School and had visions of something greener than asphalt. Instead of the empty parking spaces, she saw a pond, gardens and spaces for students to enjoy and learn about the environment. When she began to do some historical research, she discovered that her vision was actually an image from history. She found an older, long-time resident of the South Minneapolis neighborhood who recalled duck hunting as a child back in the 1930s at a wetland in the same block occupied by the school. HCD is now working with the school to design and find funding for a rain garden instal- lation at this' site. Rain gardens are vegetated areas that are designed to reduce non-point source pollution by decreasing m-off and in- creasing the inffitration of storm water. E1 Colegio, a two-year old Minneapolis Public School that works with Latino immigrants, opened last yearinaremodeled grocery store on Bloomington Avenue. Because it is located on a site where a wetland was filled-in over 60 years ago to make room for the growing city, the building has chronic flooding problems. Rain gardens at this site would serve to slow down the run-off of storm water, decrease the flooding problems and increase the amount of green space in the neighborhood. The Cooper High School River-Watch group is also making plans for a number of smaller rain gardens that will utilize run-off from the roof drains to nurtmre wetland plants and improve the aesthetics oftheir schoolyard in Robbinsdale. HCD is looking forward to implementing these lakescaping projects in 2002. ~ Volunteers Celebrate and -Sham Data at the First Annual River Summit On November 15m about 235 volunteers, professionals' and citizens interested in stream monitoring gathered at the Science Museum of Minnesota to celebrate learn and share their river stories. Students from Armstrong, St. Michael, Hopkins, Benilde-St. Margaret~ Patrick Henry, Washbum, E1 Colegio, Cooper, the Uni~ versity of MN and PEASE Academy represented Hennepin County. These students prepared some excellent poster presentations to share with their peers and professionals from the DNR, MPCA, Watershed DistriCts and the Met Council. Berdlde-St. Margaret students revegetating a stormwater treatment pond at school. Patrick Henry High School students at the River Summit. ' In addition they were entertained by musi- cian Larry Long, wrote river related poetry and music, and had a chance to tour the museum. The enthusiasm was contagious and some great networks were built between students, teachers and river experts.' Thanks to everyone for their involvementl This was the 1st Arlnual River Summit and we look forward to doing it again next year. ~ Hennepin Conservation District -463- HCD Continues Conservation Easement Efforts During 2001, HCD continued efforts to conserve environmentally important land through voluntary conservation eaSements. A conservation easement is the acquisition of a specific land right(s) for conservation purposes. Landowners who voluntarily, offer a conserva- tion easement typically receive either a payment and/or a tax advantage in.exchange for the easement. The ownership of the "eased" prop- erty remains unchanged and the easement is recorded on the land title so it transfers with the property. Typically, a conservation .practice such as the'restoration of native vegetation or a drained wetland is part of the conservation easement agreement. HCD's primary role is to provide ~the landowner technical expertise and assistance with funding opportunities for these restoration efforts. Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) and Perma- nent Wetland. Preserves (PWP) are state funded conservation eaSement programs designed to protect and improve water quality through the retirement of environmentally sensitive land and the protection of existing wetlands. Imple- mentation of the RIM & PWP programs within Hennepin County is the responsibility of the HCD. Since 1987, the HCD has enrolled ap- proxLrnately 380'acres into these two state pro- grams. Examples of eligible lands for enrollment includemarginal cropland, restorable wetlands, riparian land, existing wetlands, and other, sen- sitive lands. This past year saw no new RIM enrollments in Hennepin County because most of thestate money available for easementS went to the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Pro- .gram (CREP). BeCause CREP received matching federal money during 2001, this program, fo- cused on agricultural land in the Minnesota River Valley, waS a focus for state funding, In addition to these state programs,. HCD also holds donated easements. Donated ease- ments are often more advantageous for people seeldng a tax deduction or as a tool for estate planning. The previous issue of this newsletter announced the enticing prospect for a change in state legislation that would make it possible for conservation easement donations to be used as a tax credit. This income tax credit bill fell victim to the threat of a government shutdown and didn't make .it onto the floor for a vote. A consortium of conservation organizations in MN, will be seeking passage of this legislation in the next session. As in all of its conservation efforts. HCD works in cooperation with other organizations/ agencies in prioritizing, assessing, implement- lng, and managing its own easements and those held by 'sister organizationS/agenciesi This cooperation is essential as"it, increases'the posi- tive ·ecological 'impact' and effeCtiVenesS of ~sn- servation efforts. If you are interested in HCD's conservation easement efforts, call Roel Ronken at (763)420-2157. ~ Conservation Reserve Program, (CRP) Sign-Up CRP is a voluntary program that offers annual rental payments and cost, share assis- tance to-establish approved cover on eligible cropland. Annual rental payments are made based on the agriculture rental value of the land and cost-share assistance is provided in an amount equal to not more than 50 percent of the participant's costs in establishing approvedprac- tices. The program encourages landowners to .plant .native prairie, tree or introduced grass cover and restore' wetlands to improve' soil, water, and wildlife resources. CRP contracts last between -10 and 15 years. To be eligible to be placed in CRP, land must have'been planted 'to an annually seeded crop 2 of the last 5 years or is hay that has been in a rotation no- longer than 8 years. The CRP is administered by the USDA~ Farm Service Agency. The Natural Resources Conservation Service and Hennepin Conserva- tion District Provide assistance to landowners in planning and establishing long-term cover. If you are interested in receiving information when the signup dates are announced, contact Terry or Ed at (763) 241-1170, ext 3. ~k Hennepin Conservation District 5 Free Technical And Financial Assistance For Pasture Management Livestock owners in Hennepin County can receive free technical assistance from HCD to improve the quality of their pastures, set up rotational grazing plans,, and utilize manure properly through composting or spreading at proper rates. In addition, free soil testing is available to determine soil nutrient needs to maximize forage growth while preventing over- application of fertilizer or manure. Many local ordinances now require that manure management plans be developed and implemented for larger stables. As parcels of land get divided and become smaller, an in- crease in animal density and soil nutrient levels can eventually degrade surface and ground water through runoff and leaching. The following Best Management Practices (BMPs) can reduce this problem: Pasture renovation of those areas where severe overgrazing has occurred. A grazing plan that incorporates rota- tional grazing. Proper manure utiliTation and stockpile placement. Animal exclusion from sensitive areas (lakes, streams, and wetlands). Grass and tree buffer zones between the · livestock areas and SUrface waters. Diversion of surface runoff away from feedlots and manure stockpiles. To make it easier for landowners, the in- stall BMPs, HCD can provide 50% cost-share up to $1,000 per landowner. Winter is a good time of the year to begin planning for the upcoming grazing season. If you want to learn more about proper pasture and manure man- agement planning or interested in financial assistance call TeITy Zapzalka at (763) 241- 1170, ext 3. (~ Natural Resource Inventory in Minnetrista When most. people .think of _Hermepin County, the image is one of developed 'cities and suburbs like Minneapolis or Maple Grove. The rural City of Mirmetrista in thesouthwest- em comer of county, however, is still a rela- tively natural landscape of rolling hills, for- ests, and small farms. Because this landscape lies in a transition zone between prairie to the west and big woods to the east, there is an unusually high diversity of ecologically valu- able areas. Staff and elected officials in Mirmetrista are interested in maintaining the value of this landscape as population growth brings development to their pastoral _city. This idea of directing development to the appropri- ate areas and focusing conservation efforts on ecologically valuable land is part of the smart growth process. The fzrst step in this process is to map and Inventory the cultural and natural resources in the city. With this. inventory and land cover classification, it is possible to determine the location and quality, of natural community remnants such as Maple-Basswood Forests, Oak Savannas, Prairies and wetland systems. The City of Minnetrista entered into a contract with the Hennepin Conservation District (HCD) to complete this map and inventory. The infor- mation will be,useful in future efforts to deter- mine priority locations for natural corridors, parks, and trails. HCD is using the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System, (MLCCS) which was developed by the DNR as a standardized system for the classification of land cover in Minnesota. Natural Resource continued on page 7. Hennepin Conservation District -465- Elm and Pioneer Sarah Creek Watersheds Receive Public Input .On Management Plans Seventy-five people attended'a dotnt Pub- lic Input Meeting for the preparation of Second Generation Watershed Management Plans in Elm and Pioneer Sarah Creek Watersheds· The discussions focused on water resource issues and the COmmissions received valuable input. About a dozen priorities ranging from shoreline protection to population densitywere identified and' the participants then VOted on priority issues. This process resulted in the following lists of most.important issues for th'e residents within each watershed: Elm Creek Watershed · Water quality, especially in Elm Creek and the Mill Pond in Champlin, · Groundwater and surface water impacts to groundwater · Fish and Wildlife protection and mainte- nance · Educating residents on water resource issues such as responsible yard waste management and fertilizer use · Implementing a non-degradation policy. Pioneer-Sarah Creek Watershed · Water quality, especially in Lake Inde- pendence · The increase in population/development and .how it impacts water resources- . Implementing a non-degradation policy. · Educating residents on water resources · High water levels in Lake Sarah · 'Feedlots/livestock impacts onwater qual- Ity . Identifying future funding sources and preventing unnecessary requirements that cost money to residents or develop- ers Public Input Questionnaires were also dis- tributed to the residents and posted on the HCD web page at www.hcd.hennepin,mn.us/ watershed for those who could-not attend .the meeting. Information from these meetings will be Used to develop Watershed Management Plans for each commission. The CommiSsion's consultant, with assistance from HCD, will be preparing draft plans that will be reviewed by the Commission In January. A second Public Input Meeting will be. held sometime in Febru- ary or March. Contact HCD for more informa- tion on these watershed plans. ~ Natural Resource continued from page 6. This system classifies current land cover down toa species level. Land cover includes natural or cultural vegetation and impervious cover like asphalt or buildings. The natural remnants are then assessed for their relative quality. In addition, invasive species such as purple loosestrife, reed canary grass and buckthom are mapped; rare or unique species are documented; and-threats to natural communities are noted· Ecologically Valuable Natural Communities such 'as this Tamarack Swamp are Identi'fied in the Resource Inventory Minnetrista is taking a proactive step to conserve this ecologically valuable and beau- tiful landscape and HCD is pleased,to be a part of these efforts. Other areas in 'Hennepin County where this process has' been com- pleted include: the Minnehaha Creek Water- shed, the City of Corcoran, Hassan Township, the City of Medina and portions of the City of Dayton. If you would like any more informa- tion about natural resource inventories, con- tact David Thill at HCD (763) 420~2157. ~ Hennepin Conservation District -466- Hennepin Conservation District 6900 Wedgwood Road, #140 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55311 (763) 420-2157 fax: (763.)494-3176 emaih hcd@hcd.hennepin.mn.us Inside This Issue... I~tter F~'om the Chub' 1 Wetland Heath Evaluation Project 1 New Parnershlps for HCD 2 HCD River Monitoring & Stewardship 3 Rain Gal-den Projects 4 Elm & Pioneer-Sarah Creek Mngmt Plans 7 web page: www,hcd.hennepin.mn.us 2'1 ***"v'~*****'~**********3-DIGIT 553 MR ED SHUKLE. MANAGER CiTY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364-1627 l,l,l,,h,h,.,lh,lt,,,h,h,,ll,lh,,,'l,lh,,l,l,,I,,,Ih]l,,I Printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post consumer waste Upcoming Events Conservation Events in Hennepin County Road Salt Symposium, February 1, 2002; 8:00 am-4:30 pm. Location: Freshwater Institute, Navarre, MN. Learn about the toxic effects of road salt on natural resources Registration is $50.00 by January 20% $70 for late registration. Continental breakfast, lunch and social hour are included in the registration fee. For registration, contact Fortin Consulting at 763-478-3606 or fci@iaxs.net. Shoreline and Water Garden Design Classes'. March 9, 2002; 9 am-3 pm. Location: Freshwater Institute, Navarre, MN. Learn how to create a beautiful natural area at your shoreline or design a water garden for your patio or yard. Reg- istration is $20 (includes lunch). For registration, contact Jeanne Prok at 952- 471-9773 or jeanne@freshwater, org Region IV Envirothon. May 7, 2002; Location: MN Landscape Arboreteum. Teachers please conrace HCD by Febru- ary 1st to register for this annual environ- mental learning opportunity. 763-420~2157 ~ 'HCD Board of Supervisor~ Chair Karen Johnson Supervisor Jean Coleman Supervisor C. Joseph Newberg Supervisor Sever Peterson Supervisor Leigh Harrod HCD Staff Carolyn Dindoff, Limnologist Ali Durgunoglu, Engineer Steve Hobbs, Manager Donovan Koxvold, GIS Coordinator HoUy Stein, GIS Technician Tim Reese, Environmental Ed. Coord. District 3 Brooklyn Park District 1 Minneapolis District 2 Minneapolis District 4 Eden Prairie District 5 Excelsior Rnel Ronken, Conservation Tech. Ellen Sones, Sr. Environmentalist Theresa Stasica. Office Administrator David Thill, Conservation Specialist Jim Kujawa, Water Resource Specialist Terrence Zapzalk~ Conservation Tech. Hennepin Conservation District -467- 8 CiTY OF MOUND BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT DECEMBER YEAR: 2001 THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE RESIDENTIAL NEW CONSTRUCTION II#PERMITsll #UNITS II VALUATION II #UNITS II VALUATION~ SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED * . 5 5 1,053,800 17~ 3,494,105- SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 41 430,000 TWO FAMILY / DUPLEX - MULTIPLE FAMILY (3 OR MORE UNITS) TRANSIENT HSG. (HOTELS / MOTELS) SUBTOTAL 5 5i 1,053,800 21 3,924,t05 COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) 11 141,794- OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC / SCHOOLS SUBTOTAL 0 0 I 141,79~ ~,DDITIONS TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING 2 99,014 37 1,363,487 )ETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 15 246,455 :)ECKS 2 25,200 63 298,174 SWIMMING POOLS ~,EMODEL - MISC. RESIDENTIAL 53 292,623 117' 7,227,684 ~,EMODEL - MULTIPLE DWELLINGS 7 49,457 SUBTOTAL 57 0 4t6,837 1293 9,185,25~ NON-RESIDENTIAL 2,OMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) 5 22,157 3FFICE / PROFESSIONAL 3 197,917 NDUSTRIAL !PUBLIC / SCHOOLS 5 220,619 iDETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 1 65,000 1 65,00~ iS U BTOTAL 1 65,000 14 505,683' DEMOLITIONS I~ PERMITS I I VALUATION II~ PERMITS I VALUATiO~ RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS 2 9 NON-RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS 3 MOVE BUILDING - RESIDENTIAL 1 TOTAL DEMOLITIONS 2 0 13 # UNITS ~ PERMITS # UNITS VALUATION # PERMITS VALUATION TOTAL 8511 Sll t,535,637 II 1,342 II 13,756,843 I THIS I YEAR - TO- PERMIT COUNT MONTH DATE * BUILDING 65 1342 FENCES & RETAINING WALLS 0 28 SIGNS 3 15 PLUMBING 14 191 VIECHANICAL 11 141 GRADING 2 8 S & W, STREET EXCAV., FIRE, ETC. 10 45 TOTAL I lo5 I 1770 -468- 01/08/2002 16:38 FAX 15078354567 MEDIACOM ~002/003 Medi 14762 Conm .~rce Av~, Suite 100 l~or Lake, '~ ~V $$372 Eamil: tbo. r~ ,dl~m~aComcacom P&o~e: (952) 440-96~# ext. 222 Toll Free: (888) $91-8062 ext. 222 Fax: (952) 440.9661 To~ : Bords~ Dii,ector of ( ~vernment Relations January 8, City of Mom:d City Mgr Kand I-lanron 53~;1 Mayweod Id Meund, MN 5.~ r~b-1627 Dc~r Mayor M~ ~1, City Mgr Hanson and Elected Officials , Media to ,"m~h Me~i~ rec~qv~ pmgta~ programming ~ ~fio~ $5~ 16(~ ~ ~ doll~ ~e Ht M~z of ~ F~ ~at v~le. Mo in ~ p~ s P~ rm is gommitted tO Orovidillg excelleatt t~chnology, quality programming, and flrst~l~ customer so, vice in commmflty, Significant local investment is required in these areas to assure tlmt your ~ may ning and services unsurpassed in other conuaunities. ~ng updating and maintatn~g cable systems with now t~lmolo~ is nec~ssa~ to off~ more video th digital services and high-speed Inmraet data products. Media0om has invested $80 minion in ~ystem ~ipment in the last year in Iowa, Minnesota, Wi~omin and 5outh Dakota. Medi_acom has committed an mU,on to upgrade cable systems ~n this area over the next yee. r. This invesUmm includes building over ~er optic cable to unk sysm~ such as yours with m~ter sisaml distribution centers. These investmem ally been plowed into your community in und~round facilities or lumg from poles in your rights-at-way. mt will implement a rate adj~anent for cable services in your community effective Febnuay 1, 2002. find a listing ff the new rates ~md clmrges for Mediacom services in your area. Customers will be notified tOgrnmmtng ~qxoige~ 81'e Bt~gessary to m~ice the ~t in cable system upgrades and nmin~n~nce acorn's commitment to provide great programming means adding cl~_nnels that cuslomers w~t and reels customers vlready enjoy. We've heard our customers' requests to provide great chanuels in our basic ~ add~'~ digital pl'olgrsmmi~g tO lloll-digital lhl~. Th~ escalation of progl~mming costs lis a ijustmcuts. Mediacom docs ncc hold any ~rmncial interest in any programming entities on~ hopes to keep dnlng and technoloi~ to take c~re ofc~ needs, Mediacom has hired and trained more than 120 ~ 10C8I commtHtitic8 OVer tl~ psat yeSl'. We ~ addl~ sta~ to tllke otlstom~ 08115 Otl a 24 hot~, ? day itches to handle and route {aflls to reduce hold times mad lmndle the larger volume of calls generated by ~in Bord~ell, )imctor of Government R~lations En ~losurc -469- 01/08/2002 16:59 FAX 15078354567 MEDIACOM Medi IMPORTANT Rate Information In order for us to enhance and sustain the quality of services we offer in the Chanhassan, Mound, Wayzata, Waconia, Loretto, Maple Plain, Deephaven, Excelsior, Greenwood, Minnetonka Beach, Long Lake, Medina, Minnetrista, Orono, Shorewood, Spring Park, St, Bonifacious, Tonka Bay, Victoria, Woodland, Credit River, Prior Lake., Canterbury Estates, Savage and Spring Lake areas, we will be adjusting the cost of cable service. Listed below are the new rates. Rates may be subject to change. NEW RATES Effective February, 2002 Broadcast Basic ....................... $13.50 Family Cable ........................... $39.95 Digital Access ......................... $52.95 Digital Family .......................... $56.95 Digital Choice .......................... $62.95 Digital Value ............................ $72.95 Digital Value Plus ................... $78.95 Digital Choice w/HBO .............. $65.95 Digital Value w/HBO ............... $75,95 Digital Value Plus w/HBO ........ $81.95 Total Digital w/HBO .................. $84.95 Medi 1-800-800-CABLE 003/003 -470- City ofWaconi/Official Site Page 1 of 2 i'More City Information C~ty Hall Concept Plan Unveiled With an eye to our future, the City has adopted plan that provides senior housing and expanded space for the City Hall, Carver County Library, of Commerce, and Sheriff's Department in dow: Waconia. A feasibility study completed in 1998 confirme, current facilities are too small to serve our curre future population. During our study, we also dis need for additional senior housing. The Carver { Housing and Redevelopment Authority has corr with a proposal to construct 68 market rate apar seniors and an under structure parking garage al City Hall and Library. The concept plan provides roughly.30,000 squa space, for the City Hall, Library, Chamber, and Department on the first floor. The second floor the parking gyage for the senior apartment. Th{ apartments would be located on the third throug floors. The area of downtown that we are pursuing is b Olive and Vine Streets along Second Street. We working with the four property owners in the ar acquire their buildings and relocate their busine topography in this area drops 20 feet from Oliw Street. Our concept plan uses the grade change: allows us to tuck a portion of the building into t The current concept plan does involve closing c rerouting the section of Second Street between ~ Vine Streets. "Developing a plan that looks forward by better integrating our civic functions with senior housi opportunities will continue to strengthen our vis Waconia and its downtown," says Mayor Don J http ://www, waconia, org/ch, htm - 471 - 1 /11/2002 C 145 University Avenue West, St. Pa~, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651)281-1200 · (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1299 ° TDD (651) 281-1290 Web Site: http://www.lmnc.org TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mayors and Administrators Jim Miller, Executive Director January 15, 2002 Informational Forum The League of Minnesota Cities will be hosting an informational forum to discuss implications of the Governor's proposed budget cuts and discuss responses we have received in regards to the budget cuts. When: Time: Where: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:00 PM City of Burnsville COMMUNITY ROOM 100 Civic Center Parkway Burnsville, MN 55337 A similar meeting is being held on Wednesday, January 16, 2002 in Duluth, and hope that if you are unable to attend that fo, urn you will be available to attend the one in Bm'nsville. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -472-