2002-06-25PI,EASE TURN OFF Al.1. CEI.I. PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 25, 2002 - 7:30 PM
MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted b'y a Single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
o
OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS
*CONSENT AGENDA
*A. APPROVE MINUTES: JUNE 11, 2002 REGULAR MEETING
*B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
*C. APPROVE PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT
*D. APPROVE 2002 RIP-RAP PROJECT
*E.
APPROVE PROPOSAL FROM BRIMEYER GROUP FOR POLICE
CHIEF SEARCH
*F.
APPROVE APPOINTMENT OF CITY MANAGER AS DIRECTOR
TO MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOCIATION
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY
ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.)
ACTION ON APPLICATION FOR LIVE MUSIC
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. TEXT AMENDMENT(S) TO ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW
ESSENTIAL SERVICE AND BUILDINGS BY CONDITIONAL USE
Bo
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
PROJECT
1. ACTION ON RESOLUTION APPROVING REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA AND PLAN
2. ACTION ON RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY OF LEASE
2980-2986
2987-3009
3010-3013
3014-3022
3023-3030
3031-3032
3033-3034
3035-3047
3048-3064
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO RECONVENE HRA MEETING
10.
11.
12.
RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PRESENTATION OF INTERIOR DESIGN OF LIQUOR STORE
BUILDING OFFICIAL MATT SIMONEAU WITH OVERVIEW OF POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES
REPORT ON ISLAND PARK HALL, WITH DIRECTION TO STAFF
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. AMM Fax News 3069-3070
B. LMCD correspondence 3071-3100
C. FYI: 2002 Elected Officials Salary Survey 3101-3112
D. Letter: Donna Smith on garage sale signs 3113-3115
E. Letter: Joanne Brandt on redevelopment 3116
F. Article: Thoughts about the governance model 3117
G. Report: Mound Police Department - May 2002 3118-3123
H. Report: Finance Department - May 2002 3124-3126
I. Report: Gift of charitable gamble proceeds to Fire Department 3127-3128
J. Letter: follow-up with Paige Robertson on Mound City Days 3129
K. LMCC July schedule 3130-3132
L. Report: Public Safety building 3133-3139
3065-3067
3068
13. ADJOURN
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting.
agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citvo, fmound, com.
More current meeting
COUNCIL BRIEFING
June 25, 2002
Opcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
June 25 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
June 25 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
June 26 - 1:30 City golf outing
June 27 - 7:00 - Music in the Park
June 28 - 6:00 - Police Chief retirement party
July 9 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
July 9 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
July 11 - 7:00 - Music in the Park
July 25 - City Hall closes at 2:30 for employee appreciation events
I will be on vacation July 4-14. Gino Businaro will act as City Manager in my absence, including at the July 9
meetings.
g3.E. Search Firm for Police Chief
Brimeyer and Associates is poised to assist with the hiring process for the Police Chief. This proposal is similar
to the one for the Community Development Director. It has Brimeyer interviewing key people in advance,
preparing a profile of the job and the city, advertising, prescreening candidates and doing ordinary background
checking. I will organize and carry out the day of interview, which is a 12 hour process, starting with a tour of
the city at 8:00 a.m. and will include a public open house to meet the candidates, at which written comments
will be taken and seriously considered. Finally, I will offer the job and negotiate the terms. Some additional
will be detailed back grounding and a psychological exam, normal for hiring a police chief.
g3.F. City Manager as Director
The Mound Market place Agreement has the City Manager acting as the City's representative on the
Association Board. This action simply has Council Members making that appointment, thus fulfilling the
agreement.
gl0. Liquor Store Interior Design
Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm and I recently met with the architects. Joel helped with decisions regarding
fixtures and he affirmed my recommendations for paint, carpet, tile, counters, etc. What do you think of the
selections??? It's going to be a classy store. I also have some marketing ideas for our new image that I will be
sharing with the management. This means profits, profits, profits!!
gl 1. Island Park Hall
My recommendation regarding the Island Park Hall is to simply put it on hold until the space needs for the
public works and parks divisions is revisited in a couple of years. Then the fate of the building can be
determined. My long-term vision is to have public works and parks combine at the public works site, demo the
parks garage, and sell the site to a person who has an interest in restoring the Hall into a home. That reaps $'s
for the City and preserves the building--a win,win situation for all. In the meantime, the Task Force can be
disbanded. Thanks for your support of this study.
gl2.D. Garage Sale Signs
Donna Smith will address the Council regarding our current policy on garage sale signage. I support her
eh omment that it could be modified to allow for a long-standing tradition to occur without penalty. Signs should
en come down or result in penalty. This would require an amendment to the City Code.
~tuman Resources:
Volunteer Fire Chief Greg Pederson will be elevated to Acting Full-time Fire Chief', starting July 1, 2002.
Whereas, I had planned to hire a full-time chief earlier this year, I realized that a potentially new person
stepping mid-stream into the Public Safety building planning process would not be a good thing to happen.
Especially since Police Chief Len Harrell will not be involved in the project after June 30. I felt that continuity
is important at this time and that Pederson should be compensated with a real wage, not a volunteer wage, for
the 40+ hours per week he is devoting to the project and other responsibilities. He is being treated similarly to
Bonnie Ritter when she acted as City Clerk, earning no benefits or accruals. The hiring process will resume in
Spring 2003.
Sergeant John McKinley will be elevated to Acting Police Chief after with the retirement of Police Chief Len
Harrell. Whereas I had planned a competitive and subjective process, I received a letter from Sgt Todd Truax
explaining problems of his availability during upcoming months, and that he did not wish to be considered.
That nan'owed the candidates to Sgt McKinley. The additional responsibilities remove McKinley from his
bargaining unit during his tenure as Acting Chief.
Rick Todd has been hired as Public Works Maintenance Worker, to replace Mike Anderson who recently left
the Public Works Department. Rick Todd happens to be Pat Meisel's brother, which had no bearing in this
decision. Rick is well-qualified for the job, and has a good history established with our Fire Department.
Other:
Untiedt's Vegetable Stand has been put up on the comer of Commerce and Lynwood, where they were located
in past years. I felt it was important to notify you that Untiedt's do not need a permit from the City because
they either grow their own produce or buy from an exempt grower, which exempts them under the City Code.
John Dean stated that because the City gave him a permit to be there last year, and nothing has changed since
then, it would be very difficult to prevent him from locating there again this year. Untiedt's were offered other
city-owned location but they prefer the space they have been in, and realize that when CSAH 15 construction
begins that this space will no longer be available. Also, the City has no jurisdiction over that portion of the lot,
as it belongs to Mueller Lansing, and they have agreed to let Untiedt locate there again.
MOUND cI'rY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 11, 2002
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular
session on Tuesday, June 11,2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pay Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek, and Peter Meyer.
Others Present: City Attorney, John Dean; City Manager, Kandis Hanson; City Clerk,
Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director, Sarah Smith; City Engineer, John
Cameron; City Planner, Loren Gordon; Finance Director, Gino Businaro; Parks Director,
Jim Fackler; Lorrie Ham, Craig Fink, Frank Weiland, Ken Cu~ Skipp La Joy, Matt
La Joy, Angela La Joy, Milton Hentges, Randy Behean La Samstap, Lenry
Laznairz, Miles Britz, Ann Eberhart, Jeff Anderson, iund, Tom and Nancy
Walsh, Roy Peterson, Todd Warner, Sue Cathers, L~
Consent Agenda: Afl items listed under the
routine in nature by the Council and will be
separate discussion on these items unless a
which event the item will be remOVed ~e Col
normal sequence.
are to be
call vote. There' will be no
mber or citizen so requests, in
,enda and considered in
1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meet
recited.
p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was
2. APPROVE AGEND
Mayor Meisel requ
within the City.' requ~
of item 9A, a letter she received regarding signage
of 10K, a beautification project.
MOTION by Hanu
in favor. Motion carri~
Osmek to approve the agenda as amended. All voted
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Hanus requested the removal of K and Meisel requested the removal of F and H.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda with the
exception of F, H and K. Upon roll call vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approval of Minutes of the May 21, 2002 special meeting and the May 28, 2002
regular meeting
B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $225,519.66.
C. Approve Liquor License renewals: (subject to receipt of all forms, fees & proof of
insurance)
Club On-Sale: VFW Post 5113 and American Legion
-2980-
Mound City Council - June 1:1, 2002
Sunday On-Sale: VFW Post 5113 and American Legion
On-sale Wine: Al & Alma's Supper Club and House of Moy
3.2 Beer On-sale: Al & Alma's Supper Club and House of Moy
Off-Sale 3.2 Beer: Mainstreet Market, PDQ Foods and Super America
RESOLUTION NO, 02-64: RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING THE
AUTHORIZATION OF CITY SPONSORSHIP OF STATE GRANT-IN-AID
SNOWMOBILE TRAIL FUNDS.
RESOLUTION NO, 02-65: RESOLUTION RELATING TO LOCAL
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
AND DELIVERY OF SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT AND
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.
F. (removed)
G. Approval to Suburban Wildlife Control to hunt or
health and safety purposes.
H. (removed)
I. Approve advertisement for bids for 2002
J. Approve Payment Request #2 for Im
to Doboszenski & Sons in the amount
K. (removed)
imals in the Cityfor
im
ect 20 Visions 2nd)
3F. ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTll
There was discussion regarding the len(
restriction for new sod. It was
week to one month.
ITY CODE
to the odd/even
should be changed from one
MOTION by Brown,
in favor: Brown, Har
carried.
d Meye~
the following ordinance. Those voting
Those voting against: Osmek. Motion
ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 610 OF THE
CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE WATER
~EPARTMENT.
3H. JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETVVEEN CITY AND HENNEPIN
COUNTY FOR CBDG IN FY 2003-2005
Meisel stated that she feels it is a good move to enter into this agreement because the
funds received in the past were very well spent in the community. It was noted that
Sarah Smith is now a member of the board and will keep the Council abreast of
happenings there.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to adopt the following resolution All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
2
-2981 -
Mound City Council - June 11, 2002
RESOLUTION NO. 02-66: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF MOUND AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOP,
PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PROGRAM IN FY 2003-2005.
3K. FIREWORKS
A. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to pass the following ordinance as
amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 08-2002: AN ORDINANCE
THE MOUND CITY
WEAPONS,
AND TRAPPING.
lNG SECTION 905 OF
IT RELATES TO
FIREWORKS, HUNTING
MOTION by Brown, seconded by
amended. All voted in favor. Motion ca~
ORDINANCE NO. 09-2002: AN ORDI
CITY CODE
PO~
the ordinance as
SECTION 906 TO THE
RELATES TO THE SALE,
USE OF FIREWORKS
MOTION by Brown, seconded
resolution, with the
Sell Fireworks. This
charged if any
favor: Brown, Hanu.~
Meyer. Motio
RESOLUTI
4. SuGGi
NOT ON THEAGE
None were offered.
the following fee schedule
addition of a license fee for License to
00/year, with an additional $35 being
is required. The following voted in
~ng voted against: Osmek and
SOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE.
~TIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM
5. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING UPDATE
Construction Manager, Todd Christopherson, and ArChitect, Miles Britz updated the
Council on the schedule, budget and plans for the public safety facility. They brought to
the Council's attention that a neighboring parcel juts into the property line, and if the City
could secure that property it would provide for a better parking situation. Securing this
small parcel will be investigated.
6. POSSIBLE ANNEXATION/DETACHMENT OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6400
LYNWOOD BLVD - MILTON HENTGES
Sarah Smith informed the Council that Milton Hentges, owner of the property at 6400
Lynwood BIvdl has submitted a request to initiate proceedings to detach his property
from the City of Minnetrista and annex it to the City of Mound pursuant to
-2982-
Mound City Council - June 11, 2002
M.S.S.414.062 Subd. 5. The purpose of the request is to accommodate a future
subdivision to create an additional lot that would be subsequently sold to his daughter.
Presently this property straddles the corporate boundaries of both cities. It was noted
that the City.of Minnetrista has denied this request.
Mr. Hentges has been in contact with the Minnesota Planning Agency regarding the
procedure for their review. The Council is concerned with the cost to the City in these
proceedings and suggests that an agreement be drawn up, exclusive of the process,
between Hentges and the City of Mound that would state a maximum amount that the
City would be liable for, and anything above that amount Hentges is responsible for, or
Hentges can stop the process.
Dean suggested that a resolution be prepared in su
execute the resolution until the side agreement, as de
~nexation, but not to
,ove, is introduced.
After further discussion, there was a MOTION b
Mayor Meisel meet with Mayor Fischer of Minr
agreement on the issue. Meisel will meet
mutual agreementand a resolution for actiOn at
voting in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel mek.
Motion carried.
secon Osmek to have
if come to mutual
meeting and prepare a
meeting, if warranted. Those
voting against: Meyer.
7. UPDATE FROM TODD
Sarah Smith reviewed the a
dock. ~
GING THE MINNEHAHA TO MOUND
of the LMCD regarding the proposed
Roy Peterson, 5815
presented to the
area is already
winter to keep th
open
voiced concern on how this dock concept was
~sed the concern over parking, as parking in that
danger issue if the area is aerated in the
Linda Skoglund, 5823 Blvd, also appeared to voice neighborhood concern,
along with stating that ~d is a lake city without lifeguards at its beaches, yet is
thinking of instaling a huge pier that costs lots of money, next to a main public
swimming beach. She is also concerned with ADA requirements and the parking issue.
Tom Walsh, 5077 Bartlett asked about the frequency of the Minnehaha docking at the
proposed pier, along with who pays for the improvement of the dock. Meisel stated that
these are strictly the beginning of many discussions.
Laurie Fitz, 5776 Bartlett expresSed worry about the children in the area - if chemical~
testing for the affect on the large boat motor would have an affect on the beach. She is
concerned about the limited parking in the area as well as the welfare of the children.
4
-2983-
Mound City Council - June 11,2002
Todd Warner wants it understood that the proposed dock is for the Minnehaha and the
Minnehaha only, not other large craft. As far as charter boats go, the Minnehaha is not
a charter boat. Individuals will buy a ticket for a ride on the boat. There won't be tour
buses coming into town full of people that have chartered the boat.
Wamer asked what the next step in the process should be. After discussion it was
decided that the City Manager will head a committee that will identify and resolve issues
brought forth, and bring recommendations back to the Council. It was noted that no
action will be taken by the City that requires expending City funds.
At 11:00 p.m. Mayor Meisel called for a 10-minute break, and
at 11:10 p.m.
meeting reconvened
J
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Case02-15: Lake'Minnetonka
Permit for 4831 Shoreline Drive
Sarah Smith reviewed the application, indi(
purpose in 1995 and 1997, but neither are
staff recommend approval of the CUP to
the property located at 4831 sh(
the resolution.
- Conditional Use
;UP's granted for this
Planning Commission and
lot sales as a principal use on
certain conditions as noted in
Mayor Meisel stated that th
reopened the hearing
introduce himself to
is continued from May 25, 2002, and
La Joy, applicant, came forward to
to answer any questions.
Mayor Meisel cio;
at 11:17 p.m.
MOTION b secol
in favor.
to adopt the following resolution. All voted
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW "OPEN LOT VEHICLE SALES"
FOR LAKE MINNETONKA QUALITY MOTORS
LOCATED IN THE B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT AT 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE, LOTS 1 TO 4,
21 AND PART OF 5 AND 20, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY
HILLS UNIT A. PID #13-117-24-44-0014, P &Z CASE
#02-15.
5
-2984-
Mound Clt7 Council - June 11, 2002
B. Case 02-06: Henry & Gina Laniarz, Preliminary Plat, Minnetonka Trails (4) Maior
Su'bd, Lots 6,7,9,18,19,20,21, Block 14, Avalon
Loren Gordon presented the major subdivision preliminary plat for consideration,
stating that the subdivision takes three lots and makes them into four lots. Staff and
Planning Commiss!on are'both recommending approval of this Preliminary Plat with
conditions as contained in the resolution.
The park dedication fee will be verified with the resolution to state that this fee shall
be determined and paid before the final plat is presented.
Mayor Meisel opened the hearing at 11:32 p.m. Henry La '~rz approached the
Council, asking for approval of this Preliminary Plat andthat he agrees to
grant the neighbor a perpetual easement for the retail and its maintenance.
Mayor Meisel closed the hearing at 11:33 p.m.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek
amended. All voted in favor. Motion
g :)n as
RESOLUTION NO. 02-69:1
APl
RESIDEI
PRELIMINARY PLAT
MINNETONKA TRAILS
, P & Z CASE #02-06.
9. PROPOSED POST RETI
Gino Businaro presented
the Council. This plan is ti'
proposal with the
CARE SAVINGS PLAN
Health Care Savings Plan to
Personnel Committee negotiating a
Program Committee.
MOTION by
amendment to th
Meisel and Meyer.
second
Admin
to approve this plan as presented, as an
Code. The following voted in favor: Brown,
voted against: Hanus and Osmek. Motion carded.
9A. LETTER RECEIVE
MAYOR REGARDING SIGNAGE WITHIN THE CITY
Mayor Meisel informed the Council that she received a ietter regarding signage put on ·
corners and right of ways. Sarah Smith will investigate the current regulations and take
steps to have these signs removed according to code.
10. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. AMM Fax News
B. FYI: Officer Alexander resignation
C. Newsletter: Gillespie Center
D. Letter: Governor Ventura
E. Lake Minnetonka fireworks celebration
F. Newsletter: Ehlers & Assoc
G. Report: Minnesota Health Dept
-2985-
Excerpts from Mankato State University newsletter
Minutes: Dock and Commons Commission - May 14, 2002
Minutes: Parks and Open Space Commission - May 9, 2002
Peter Meyer announced that this Saturday, June 15, volunteers are to
meet behind the Longpre building at 8:00 a.m. to paint the plywood as one
of his beautification projects.
'11. ADJOURN
MOTION by Brown, seconded by .Meisel to adjoum the meeting at 12:02 a.m. The
voting in favor: Hanus, Brown, Meisel and Meyer. Those voting against: Osmek.
Motion carried.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Meisel
7
-2986-
JUNE 25, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
060702SUE $15.00
061202SU E $10,039.80
061902SUE $3,205.10
062502S U E $203,350.17
TOTAL
$216,610.07
-2987-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/07~02 8:37 AM
Page 1
Current Period: June 2002
Batch Name 060702SUE User Dollar Amt $'15.00
Payments
Refer 60702 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 060702
Transaction Date 6/7/2002
Fund Summary
Computer Dollar Amt $15.00
$0.00 In Balance
6/7/2002
BACKGROUND CHECK
601 WATER FUND
$15.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15.00
10100 MarqueEe Bank Mound
$15,00
$15.00
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$15.00
$15.00
-2988-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/12/02 7:55 AM
Page 1
Current Period: June 2002
Batch Name 061202SUE User Dollar Amt $10,039.80
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $10,039.80
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 61202 BREITNER, JOHN 6/12/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs FINAL PAYMENT REVISED
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 61202 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA 6/12/2002
05-02 472-0635
Cash Payment
Invoice 053002
Cash Payment
Invoice 053002
Cash Payment
Invoice 053002
Cash Payment
invoice 053002
Cash Payment
Invoice 053002
Cash Payment
Invoice 053002
,'ransaction Date
Refer
E 101-43100-321 Telephone
E 601-49400-321 Telephone
E 602-49450-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone 05-02 472-0621
E 609-49750-321 Telephone 06-02 472-3093
E 101-41910-321 Telephone 05-02 472-0600
6/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
61202 GRADY, DANIEL 6/12/2002
Cash Payment
05-02 472-0635
05-02 472-0635
$2,153.87
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date
E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies
$2,153.67
$332.66
$332.66
$332.65
$747.32
$274.66
$1,042.08
6/10/2002
10100 Total $3,062.03
Total
ADVANCE STATE FIRE SCHOOL JUNE 13-
16,2020
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$450.00
$450.00
Refer 61202
Cash Payment
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date
GRADY, KEVIN 6/12/2002
E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies ADVANCE STATE FIRE SCHOOL JUNE 13-
16,2002
6/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 61202 HARDIIVA, DAMON
G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical
6/10/2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date
$450.00
Total
6/12/2002
REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE
$450.00
$763.45
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$763.45
Refer 61202
Cash Payment
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/10/2002
Refer 61202 NELSON, JOYCE
Cash Payment
Invoice 061202
'transaction Date
KRYCK, ROGER 6/12/2002
E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies ADVANCE STATE FIRE SCHOOL JUNE 13-
16,2002
G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical
6/11/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
6/12/2002
REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE
$450.00
$450.00
$629.42
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $629.42
Refer 61202 PEDERSON, GREG
6/12/2002
-2989-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/12/02 7:55 AM
Page 2
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies ADVANCE STATE FIRE SCHOOL JUN 13-16, $450.00
2002
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $450.00
Refer 61202 POIKONEN, DARREN 6/12/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies ADVANCE STATE FIRE SCHOOL JUNE 13- $450.00
16,2002
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $450.00
Refer 61202 POUNDER, CHRISTOPHER 6/1212002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies ADVANCE STATE FIRE SCHOOL JUNE 13- $450.00
16,2002
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $450.00
Refer 61202 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (FIR
Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 052302
Transaction Date 6/7/2002
Refer 61202 WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY
Payment E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies
061202
Transaction Date 6/10/2002
Fund Summary
6/12/2002
THRU 05-23-02 GASOLINE CHARGES
$281.03
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $281.03
6/12/2002
ADVANCE STATE FIRE SCHOOL JUNE 13-16, $450.00
2002
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $450.00
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$5,668.80
$3,431.03
$332.66
$332.65
$274.66
$10,039.80
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$10,039.80
$10,039.80
-2990-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 1:35 PM
Page 1
Current Period: June 2002
Batch Name 061902SUE User Dollar Amt $3,205.10
Payments Corn purer Dollar Amt $3,205.10
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 61902 DEBORD, JEANNEM. 6/25/2002
Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE $1,051.95
Invoice 061802
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,051.95
' ........ ...... ' '
Refer 62502 FRONTIER/CITIZE C MM NI 6/19/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone 04-02 472-3190 $27.44
Invoice 060702
Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone 05-02 472-3190 $28.98
Invoice 060702
Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone 06-02 472-0646 $18.02
Invoice 060702
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 06-02 472-3555 $177.97
Invoice 060702
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $252.41
~'i 902 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEAL TH 6/19/2002.
Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training RENEWAL"D" GIESE, LEE $23.00
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $23.00
Refer 61902 RELIANT ENERGY
6/19/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 04-17-02 THRU 05-16-02 5801 BARTLETT $121.55
invoice 061902
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 04-17-02 THRU 05-16-02 4812 CUMBERLAND $157.95
invoice 061902
Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 04-17-02 THRU 05-16-02 LIQUOR STORE $74.69
Invoice 061902
Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 04-17-02 THRU 05-16-02 FIRE STATION $264.56
Invoice 061902
Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 04-17-02 THRU 05-16-02 5341 MAYWOOD $574.64
ROAD
Invoice 061902
Cash Payment
Invoice 061902
Cash Payment
Invoice 061902
Cash Payment
Invoice 061902
Transaction Date
Refer
E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities
E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
6/10/2002
61902 TIMBERCREEK GOLF
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
Invoice 061902
Transaction Date 6/19/2002
04-17-02 TH RU 05-16-02 STREETS
04-17-02 THRU 05-16-02 WATER
04-17-02 THRU 05-16-02 SEWER
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
6/19~2002
EMPLOYEE GOLF OUTING
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$49.38
$28,06
$34.79
Total $1,305.62
$503,25
Total $503.25
Refer 61202 VERIZOI'V WIRELESS
6/12/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 296-9058 $8.33
Invoice 061202
-2991 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 1:35 PM
Page 2
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 590-4351 $7.27
Invoice 061202
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 590-4351 $7.27
Invoice 061202
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 590-4351 $7.26
Invoice 061202
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 723-7560 $0.92
Invoice 061202
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 751-3572 ,$4.91
Invoice 061202
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 751-3573 $2.36
Invoice 061202
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 875-4502 $8.33
Invoice 061202
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 06-02 CELL PHONES 750-2666 $22.22
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $68.87
Fund Summanj
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
10100 Ma~uette Bank Mound
$2,548.76
$481.27
$58.33
$42,05
$74.69
$3,205.10
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$3,205.10
$3,205.10
-2992-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 1
Current Period: June 2002
Batch Name 062502SUE User Dollar Amt $203,350.17
Payments Computer Dollar Amt
Refer 62502 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE 6/25/2002
$203,350.17
$0.00 In Balance
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $112.80
invoice MB216816
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $140.40
invoice MB216608
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $75.60
Invoice MB216509
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $142.80
Invoice MB216110
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $66.60
Invoice MB215906
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $82.20
Invoice MB215812
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $620.40
Refer 62502 ARNE, TEVE 6/25/2002
REFUND DOCK FEE
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits
Invoice 061802
Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees
Invoice 061802
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
Invoice 35674700
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 23989400
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 23946300
Transaction Date 6/1912002
REFUND LMCD FEE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
6/25/2002
MISCELLAENOUS
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$250.00
$7.50
$257.50
$199.43
$2,376.85
$3,317.25
$5,893.53
Refer 62502 BERDI, DOUGLAS 6/25/2002
Cash Payment R 601-37144 Sales of Meters & Reader REFUND WATER METER
Invoice 5375
Transaction Date 6/10/2002
Refer 62502 BIFFS, IAIC PORTABLE RESTRO0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
Invoice W160952
Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
Invoice W160953
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 BLACKOWIAK ANDSON SANITA TI
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
invoice 101358127
Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 101358127
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
6/25/2002
06-05-02 THRU 06-11-02
05-22-02 THRU 06-09-02
$100.00
Total
$100.00
$77.07
$237.68
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $314.75
6/25/2002
05-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $31.66
05-02 GARBAGE SERVICE
$31.66
-2993-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
0§/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 2
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 05-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $31.67
Invoice 101358127
Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10135828
Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10135878
Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10135766
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10135798
Transaction Date 6/10/2002
Refer 62502 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUP
Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 RepaidMaint Supply
Invoice 92410651 PO 17251
Transaction Date 6/13/2002
05-02 GARBAGE SERVICE
05-02 GARBAGE SERVICE
05-02 GARBAGE SERVICE
05-02 GARBAGE SERVICE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
6/25/2002
FLORESCENT BULBS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$295.61
$78.90
$17,76
$20.39
Total $507.65
$164.86
Total $164.86
Refer 62502 CHADWICK AND MERTZ
Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees
Invoice 063102
Transaction Date 6/6/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
62502 CHAMPION AUTO
6/25/2002
Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair MINIATURE LAMP
Invoice D145836
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair MISCELLANEOUS WIRE
Invoice D143267
6/25/2002.
05-02 PROFESSISONAL SERVICES
Transaction Date 6/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$5,672,00
Total $5,672.00
$4.25
$4.88
Total $9.13
Refer 62502
COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST 6/25/2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 61206074
Transaction Date 6/19/2002
Refer 62502 CONCO'
iNCoRPORATED
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Transaction Date
Refer
Cash Payment
Invoice 23889
Transaction Date
E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MIX
$286.20
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $286.20
6/25~2002
07-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE
E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal
E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest
6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
62502 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED 6/25/2002
E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 05-02 COPIER MAINTENANCE
6/10/2002
07-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE
$503.21
$458.63
Total $961.84
. $340.80
Total $340.80
'Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 62502 DARLEY, W.S. AN COMPANY
Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies
Invoice 0000571332 PO 17360
Transaction Date 6/13/2002
62502 DA Y DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 181024
6/25/2002.
ORANGE VESTS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
6/25/2002
BEER
Total
$154.75
$154.75
$2,320.65
-2994-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 3
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,197.60
Invoice 180237
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,518.25
Refer 62502 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials TRAFFIC PAINT $327.47
Invoice 35801
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 DOSSETT, SINDI
Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 061102
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502
Cash Payment
Invoice 255786
Cash Payment
Invoice 255785
Cash Payment
Invoice 254097
Cash Payment
Invoice 252776
Cash Payment
Invoice 251171
Transaction Date
Refer 62502
Cash Payment
EAST SIDE BEVERA GE
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
6/19/2002
EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, lINC,
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $327.47
6/25/2002
06-11-02 VIDEO MEETING $20.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $20.00
6/25/2002
BEER $52.10
BEER $5,210.05
BEER $244.00
BEER $4,145.35
BEER $39.00
Marque{te Bank Mou 10100 Total $9,690.50
6/25/2002.
Invoice 10914
Transaction Date
E 101-42115-329 Gopher One-Call
6/10/2002
07-01 THRU 12-30, 2002 SIREN
MAINTENANCE
$576.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $576.00
Refer 62502 ESS BROTHERS AND SONS, INCO
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice EE1863
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice EE1863
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply
Invoice EE2111
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 FALCOIV WIRELESS
Cash Payment
invoice 104850
Transaction Date
E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept.
6/13/2002
6/25/2002
VALVE RISER $4,952.25
VALVE RISER $1,166,18
RING $46.86
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
6/25/2002
PAGERS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 62502 FIRST S TA TE TIRE RECYCLING
Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 28826
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 G & K SERVICES
6/25/2002
CLEANUP DAY
Marquette Bank Mou
6/25/2002
10100
Total $6,165,29
$325.00
Total $325.00
$604,00
Total $604,00
-2995-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/024:50 PM
Page 4
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 05-28-02 UNIFORMS $30.48
Invoice 224690
Cash Payment 05-28-02 UNIFORMS $30.48
Invoice 224690
Cash Payment 05-28-2 UNIFORMS $30.48
Invoice 224690
Cash Payment 05-28-02 MATS $17,12
Invoice 224690
Cash Payment 05-28-02 MATS $17.12
Invoice 224690
Cash Payment 05-28-02 MATS $17.12
Invoice 224690
Cash Payment 06-11-02 MATS $42.47
Invoice 238573
Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 04-02-02 MATS $51.48
Invoice 169090
Cash Payment 06-11-02 MATS $81.45
Invoice 238572
Cash Payment 06-11-02 MATS $21.62
Invoice 238574
Cash Payment 06-04-02 UNIFORMS $28.34
nvoice 231639
Payment 06-04-02 UNIFORMS $28,34
Invoice 231639
Cash Payment 06-04-02 UNIFORMS $28.33
Invoice 231639
Cash Payment 06-04-02 MATS $16.19
Invoice 231639
Cash Payment 06-04-02 MATS $16.19
Invoice 231639
Cash Payment 06-04-02 MATS $16.19
Invoice 231639
Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 06-11-02 MATS $51.02
Invoice 238571
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $524,42
Refer 62502 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO REPAIR $11,15
Invoice 55779
Cash Payment
Invoice 55701
Cash Payment
Invoice 55670
Transaction Date
E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials
E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials
E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials
E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies
$4,529.65
$282.39
Total $4.823.19
E 101-41910--460 Janitorial Services
E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services
E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials
E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials
E 602.49450-230 Shop Materials
E 601.49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO REPAIR
E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO REPAIR
6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 62502 GLASS PLUS, INCORPORATED 6/25~2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies WINDOW AT DEPOT $669.57
nvoice 8366
Date
6/18/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $669.57
Refer 62602 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 6/25/2002
-2996-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 5
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 05-02 WATER $55.25
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 05-02 WATER $55.24
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 05-02 WATER $61.33
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 05-02 WATER $15.52
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 05-02 WATER $15.52
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 05-02 WATER $15.52
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 05-02 WATER $49.74
Invoice 053102
Transaction Date 6/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $268.12
Refer 62502
GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY .6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $302.24
invoice 553233
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale . LIQUOR $91.80
Invoice 557805
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,351.11
Invoice 555665
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $722.50
Invoice 555640
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $384.53
Invoice 552560
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,147.08
Invoice 552559
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE -$21.89
Invoice 588834
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,977.37
Refer 62502 GUTHRIE, WALTER 6/25/2002
R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00
R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND SHARE FEE $80.00
R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $15.00
R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LIGHT FEE $10.50
6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Cash Payment
invoice 061802
Cash Payment
Invoice 061802
Cash Payment
Invoice 061802
Cash Payment
Invoice 061802
Transaction Date
Refer 2502 GUTTOF~MSON, PATTY
Cash Payment R 101-34110 DepOt Rental
Invoice 06-18-02
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 HAWKIIVS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals
Invoice DM74956
Total $355.50
6/25/2002
REFUND DEPOT DEPOSIT $50.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.00
6/25/2002
CONTAINERS (13) $65.00
-2997-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4;50 PM
Page 6
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $65.00
Refer 62502 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials SHOP HOIST
Invoice 40886
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials SHOP HOIST
Invoice 40886
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SHOP HOIST
Invoice 40886
Marquette Bank Mou
6/25/2002
Transaction Date 6/6/2002
Refer 62502 HENNEPIN COUNTY' INFORMA TIO
Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 05-02 INTERNET SERVICE
invoice 22057036
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$10.03
$10.03
$10.03
10100 Total $30.09
$45.86
Total $45.86
Refer
Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 060202-A
Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 060602-B1
Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi
Invoice 060602-B2
Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64
invoice 060602-B3
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 060602-B4
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 060602-C 1
62502 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I 6/25/2002
05-02 LOST LAKE GREENWAY CD'S
05-02 LIFT STATION PROJECT
05-02 LANGDON BAY
05-02 METRO PLAINS
05-02 MISC PLANNING
05-02 MISC PLANNING
$214.50
$112.50
$75.00
$112.50
$2,799.05
$618.75
$600.00
$18.75
$832.50
$3O5.75
$1,244.00
Total $6,933.30
$4,342.00
Total $4,342.00
$94.2O
Cash Payment G 101-22896 Lake Mtka Trail Sub-div #02- 05-02 MTKA TRAILS PLAT
Invoice 060602-C2
Cash Payment G 101-22904 4831 Shorline Drive CUP Cu 05-02 4831 SHORELINE BLVD CUP
Invoice 060602-C3
Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 05-02 MOUND VISIONS
Invoice 060602-D
Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs 05-02 POST OFFICE RELOCATION
Invoice 060602-E 1
Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 05-02 TIF RELATED WORK
invoice 060602-E2
Transaction Date 6/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 62502 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals
Invoice 062502
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 62502 INFRA TECH 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms SAFETY VEST
Invoice 020877P
Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
6/25/2002.
07-02 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL SPACE
Total $94.20
',efer 62502 ISLAND PARK SKELLY 6/26/2002
-2998-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 7
Current Period: June 2002
E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair CABLE SET IGNITION $841.75
Cash Payment
Invoice 10476
Cash Payment
Invoice 10401
Cash Payment
Invoice 10407
Cash Payment
Invoice 10588
Cash Payment
invoice 10609
Transaction Date
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE
E 101-42110.404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SERVICE CALL
$37.55
$25,86
$39.68
$23.00
6/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 62502 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR HYDRALIC HOSE $350.82
Invoice 17181
Transaction Date 6/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $350.82
$967.84
Refer 62502 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 512514
Cash Payment G 101-22808 Adopt A Green Space
Invoice 512522
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 JOHNSON BROTHE'R"S LIQUOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 1416768
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 1416767
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 1416766
Cash Payment
Invoice 194558'
Cash Payment
invoice 194557
Cash Payment
Invoice 193091
Cash Payment
Invoice 193089
Cash Payment
Invoice 1413779
Cash Payment
Invoice 1413778
Cash Payment
Invoice 1413777
Transaction Date
Refer
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
6/19/2002
62502 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal
E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest
6/25/2002
FOAM BOARD
FLOWERS
Marquette Bank Mou
10100 Total
,, 6/25/2002
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
WINE
Marquette Bank Mou
10100 Total
6/25/2002
07-02 PRINCIPEL TRUE VALUE
07-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE
$8.71
$25.22
$33.93
$103,65
$99,00
$603.08
-$30.36
-$45.87
-$2.76
-$4,17
$115.80
$348.35
$702.80
$1,889.52
$265.03
$404.08
-2999-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 8
Current Period: June 2002
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $669.11
Refer 62502 LAKER NEWSPAPER 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing 2001 CONFIDENCE REPORT $260.69
invoice 202
Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi HARDCOVER APPLICATION $40.00
Invoice 203
Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing 06-15-02 ORDINANCE $79.60
Invoice 213
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $380.29
Refer 62502 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $108.58
Invoice 9356433
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $108.58
Invoice 9356433
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $108.59
invoice 9356433
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $38.89
Invoice 9360747
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $38.89
Invoice 9360747
;ash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $38.89
9360747
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $24.12
Invoice 9370545
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS iTEMS $24.12
Invoice 9370545
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $24.13
Invoice 9370545
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $514.79
Refer 62502 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair AIR FILTERS $75.74
invoice 034213
Transaction Date 6/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $75.74
Refer 62502 LOWELL'S AUTOMOTIVE 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair MILTON, REMOVER
Invoice 5-340651
Transaction Date 6/1312002
Refer 62502 MADDEN, FRANK AND ASSOCIA T
Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 060102
Transaction Date 6/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 62502 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
nvoice 424522
/ment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 421859
$43.32
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $43.32
6/25/2002
THRU 05-31-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $947.90
10100 Total $947.90
$3,273.05
$42.25
-3000-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 9
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer ForResate BER $12,924.75
Invoice 421858
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1.20
Invoice 375323
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $9.20
Invoice 394328
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $16,250,45
Refer 62502 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 06-03-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $16.80
Invoice 11083
Cash Payment
invoice 900000
Cash Payment
Invoice 11122
Cash Payment
Invoice 11142
Transaction Date
E 609-49750-265 Freight 06-06-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $147.20
E 609-49750-265 Freight 06-10-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $28.80
E 609-49750-265 Freight 06-13-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $80.00
6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $272.80
Refer 62502
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment
Invoice 060502
Cash Payment
Invoice 060502
Cash Payment
Invoice 060502
Cash Payment
invoice 060502
Cash Payment
Invoice 060502
Transaction Date
METRO WEST INSPECTIONS 6/25/2002
E 222-42260-170 Fire Chief-Officer Pay
E 222-42260-170 Fire Chief-Officer Pay
E 222-42260-170 Fire Chief-Officer Pay
E 222-42260-170 Fire Chief-Officer Pay
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
6/13/2002
02-02 FIRE INSPECTIONS
03-02 FIRE INSPECTIONS
04-02 FIRE iNSPECTIONS
05-02 FIRE INSPECTIONS
02-02 BLDG INSPECTIONS
03-02 BLDG INSPECTIONS
04-02 BLDG INSPECTIONS
05-02 BLDG INSPECTIONS
04-12-02 BLDG INSPECTION
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$507.50
$70.00
$245.00
$525.00
$1,020.00
$960.00
$1,110.00
$90.00
$50,0o
$4,577.50
Refer 62502 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR
Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 0000740150
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 MINNCOMMPAGiNG
Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept.
Invoice 20233306024
Transaction Date 6/13/2002
6/25/2002
07-02 WASTEWATER
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
6/25/2002
06-02 PAGERS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$31,869.30
$31,869.30
$112.52
$112.52
Refer 62502 MINNEAPOLIS DEPARTMENTHEA 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-305 Medical and Dental Fees 05-02 ANALYSIS
Invoice 2002526
$55.00
-3001 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06119102 4:50 PM
Page 10
Current Period: June 2002
Transaction Date 6/lg/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $55.00
Refer 62502 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
Cash Payment
Invoice 051302
Transaction Date
R 601-37170 State fee - Water
5/28/2002
6/25/2002
04-01-02 THRU 06-30-02 WASTEWATER
$4,605.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,605.00
Refer 62502 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INCO 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts TUBE SECTION $461.03
Invoice 674317 PO 17248
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $461.03
Refer 62502 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials BLACKTOP $35.23
Invoice 60127
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 05-24-03 BLACKTOP $1,139.06
Invoice 60897
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 05-31-01 BLACKTOP $1,741.73
invoice 61386
Transaction Date 6/6/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,916.02
$676.70
$126.74
Refer 62502 NEOPOST 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 07-05-02 THRU 07-05-03 RENT METER
nvoice 40915553
Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract INK JET CARTRIDGE
Invoice 10516012
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $803.44
Refer 62502 NEWMAN SIGNS 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGNS $64.76
Invoice TI-0088624
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $64.76
Refer 62502 NICCUM DOCKS, INCORPORA TED
Cash Payment E 281-45210-220 RepaidMaint Supply
Invoice 1804
Transaction Date 6/13/2002
Refer 62502 NORRIS, ROGER
Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues
Invoice 22310257
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
6/25/2002
NEW POST AND MUD PLATE $79.88
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $79.88
6/25/2002
REFUND WATER/SEWER $44.87
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $44.87
Refer 62502 NRG PROCESSING SOLLUTIONS L 6/25/2026
Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-02 BRUSH
Invoice 17323
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 62502 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 05-02 LOCATES
Invoice 2050534
:ash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call
qvoice 2050534
Transaction Date 6/19/2002
10100
05-02 LOCATES
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$140.58
Total $140.58
$158.10
$158.10
Total $316.20
-3002-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 11
Current Period: June 2002
Refer 62502 PBS GRAPHIC ART DESIGN 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs
invoice 00606602
Transaction Date 6/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 62502 PEPSI-COLA Co'~PANY 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MIX
Invoice 33871691
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 62502
Cash Payment
Invoice 843443
Cash Payment
Invoice 843442
Cash Payment
Invoice 843441
Cash Payment
invoice 843440
Cash Payment
Invoice 841165
Cash Payment
Invoice 841164
Transaction Date
FIRE BROCHURE LAYOUT AND DESIGN
PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS' INC 6~25/2002
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
$585.75
10100 Total $585.75
10100 Total
10100 Total
$50.09
$50.09
$215.00
$734,25
$132.30
$107.40
$733.85
$244.85
$2,167.65
Refer 62502 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES
Invoice 61408
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES
Invoice 60820
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 62502 QUALI'I~ WINE AND SPIRITS 6/25/2002
10100 Total
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 135195-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 134661-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 134558-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 132400-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 132395-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
invoice 132094-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 132077-00
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
10100 Total
$892.44
$1,368.51
$2,260.95
-$2.44
$222.72
$2,850.32
$1,285.77
$1,382.09
$3,763,96
$55.33
$9,557.75
Refer 62502 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO 6/25/2002.
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice R 05021062
AIR
$22.78
-3003-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
00119102 4:50 PM
Page 12
Current Period: June 2002
Transaction Date 6/13/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $22.78
Refer 62502 RILEY, DETTMANN, AND KELSEY
Cash Payment
Invoice 6400
Transaction Date
E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs
6/18/2002
6/25/2002
JOB DESCRIPTIONS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$675.00
Total $675.00
Refer 62502 ROAD RUNNER TRANSPORTATIO
Cash Payment
Invoice 782100
Transaction Date
E 101-41310-322 Postage
6/10/2002
6/26/2002
06-06-02 DELIVERY SERVICE
$34.85
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $34.85
Refer 62502 ROBERTS, COLLETTE 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41500-331 Meeting/Travel REIMBUSE MILEAGE
Invoice 061902
Cash Payment E 101-41500-305 Medical and Dental Fees REIMBURSE EYE EXAM
Invoice 061902
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
~502 SCHARBER AND SONS 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 10145200409 Other Equipment Repair BLADE,SCREW,ETC.
Invoice 02 2025848
Cash Payment E 101-45200409 Other Equipment Repair BALL BEARINGS
nvoice 02 2026025
Payment E 101-45200409 Other Equipment Repair BRACKET, QUILL,ETC
Invoice 02 2026067
Cash Payment E 10145200409 Other Equipment Repair DEFLECTOR,WASHER
Invoice 02-2026569
Transaction Date 6/13/2002
Refer 62502 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE
Cash Payment
Invoice 4036
Transaction Data
Refer
E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal
6/13/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
6/25/2002.
5072 TUXEDO REMOVE TREE
Marquette Bank Mou
Total
Total
$12.78
$50.00
$62.78
$84.75
$181.72
$100.57
$21.27
$388.31
$958.50
10100 Total $958.50
T '
62502 E,,/OT *, OR C,<SO~./ 8/25/2002
04-02 FACILITIES STUDY
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$13,298.15
.6/25/2002
WORK ORDERS
WORK ORDERS
Marquette Bank Mou
Total $13,298.15
Cash Payment E 40146580-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0087741
Transaction Date 6/18/2002
Refer 62502 SOS PRINTING
$59.35
$59.34
Total $118.69
10100
Cash Payment E 60149400-203 Printed Forms
Invoice 63875
Cash Payment E 602-49450-203 Printed Forms
Invoice 63875
Transaction Date 6/6/2002
Refer 62502 SPORTI/VG BREED KENNELS
Cash Payment
Invoice 062502
Date
E 10142110-445 Dog Kennel Fees
6/18/2002
$325.O0
6/25/2002
07-02 DOG KENNEL FEE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $325.00
62502
Cash Payment
Invoice 7211
STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY 6~25~2002
E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic ELECTRIC REPAIRS
$513.15
-3004-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PI~I
Page 13
Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic ELECTRIC REPAIRS $513.15
Invoice 7211
Cash Payment $513.14
Invoice 7211
Cash Payment $90.92
Invoice 7212
Cash Payment $90.92
invoice 7212
Cash Payment $90.91
Invoice 7212
Transaction Date Total $1,812.19
Refer 62502 SWARTZER, BRIAN 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-208 Instructional Supplies REIMBURSE WELDING CLASS $271.00
Invoice 061002
Transaction Date 6/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $271.00
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic ELECTRIC REPAIRS
E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic ELECTRIC REPAIRS
E 601-49400-4,40 Other Contractual Servic ELECTRIC REPAIRS
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic ELECTRIC REPAIRS
6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Rear 62502
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,925.70
Invoice 264890
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $64.25
Invoice 264889
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,483.25
Invoice 234235
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $239.30
Invoice 264234
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $94.75
Invoice 263884
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,411.45
Invoice 263409
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $68.40
Invoice 263408
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $506.75
Invoice 263180
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER -$3,583.40
Invoice 261225
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $557.20
Invoice 252617
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,966.65
Invoice 262616
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $76.55
Invoice 262615
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $859.90
Invoice 262252
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $11,769,35
Invoice 261923
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $207,00
Invoice 225010
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $244.00
Invoice 225965
-3005-
GITY OF MOUND
Payments
00119102 4:50 PM
Page 14
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 009-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 225488
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 224532
Cash Payment E 609.49750~252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 218389
Transaction Date 6/19/2002
Refer 62502' TMB CONSULTING 6/25/2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 05-234
Transaction Date
$234.00
BEER
BEER
Marquette Bank Mou
10100
E 101.41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract PRINTER/NETWORK SERVICES
6/6/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$374.00
$372.00
Total $29,871.10
$285.00
Total $285.00
Refer 62502 TRUE VALUE, MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
;ash Payment
053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
Invoice 053102
Cash Payment
nvoice 053102
Payment
nvoice 053102
Transaction Date
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies
E 101-41910-220 RepaidMaint Supply
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts
E 280-45250-229 Street Repairs
E 101-41910.401 Repairs/Maint Buildings
E 609.49750-210 Operating Supplies
E 101.43100-230 Shop Materials
E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials
E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply
E 101.43100-210 Operating Supplies
E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
E 601-49400-322 Postage
E 602.49450-322 Postage
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials
6~6~2002
6/25/2002
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$193.39
$23.48
$23.50
$4.26
$9.03
$40.01
$8.62
$46.79
$3.33
$3.33
$25.48
$84.95
$81.08
$32.39
$10.71
$10.70
$365.15
$3.33
$969.53
-3006-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19102 4:50 PM
Page 15
Current Period: June 2002
Refer 62502 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITE 6/25/2002
Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings 05-02 LIQUOR STORE PROJECT $3,240.71
invoice 10
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,240.71
Refer 62502 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 101~41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 347211-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 346613-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 346613-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450~200 Office Supplies
Invoice 346613-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
invoice 346613-0
Transaction Date 6/19/2002
6/25/2002
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
INK JET TONER
INK JET TONER
INK JET TONER
RIBBON
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$6,21
$6,21
$6.21
$6.21
$6,21
$2.07
$2.07
$3.12
$3.12
$13.64
$31.77
$31.77
$31.77
$9.15
Total $159.53
Refer 62502 UN/TED PROPERTIES 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95
Invoice 062502
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.85
Refer 62502 WATERTOWN PARTS CENTER 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply OXYGEN WELDING $54.01
Invoice 319867 PO 17320
Transaction Date 6/6/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $54.01
Refer 62502 WE/ST, KATHY 6/25/2002
-3007-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4;50 PM
Page 16
Current Period: June 2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-;[0~ Duplicating anti copying REIMBURSE CERTIFIED COPY $11.00
Invoice 061302
Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous REIMBURSE MILEAGE $21.05
Invoice 061302
Transaction Date 6/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $32.05
Refer 62502 WESTONKA MECHANICAL 6/26/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply COPPER ROLL $141.25
Invoice 6192
Transaction Date 6/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $141.25
Refer 62502 WlNKLER, BOB 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material SAND FOR CENTERVIEW $159.32
Invoice 061202
Transaction Date 6/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $159.32
Refer 62502 XCEL ENERGY 6/25/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 05-02 #2245-301-030 $952.06
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities 05-02 #0466-607-223 $21.99
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electdc UUlities 05-02 #1914-601-425 $364.63
Invoice 062502
Payment E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities 05-02 #0217-606-329 $3,185.53
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electdc Utilities 05-02 #2184-407-147 $353.44
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electdc Utilities 05-02 #0047-005-229 $157.15
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 05-02 #0864-508-832 $94.06
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 05-02 #O864-508-832 $94.06
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 05-02 #0864-508-832 $94.06
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electdc Utilities 05~02 #0018-802-634 $1,825.12
Invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 05-02 #0009-604-835 $292.33
invoice 062502
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 05-02 #0542-505-000-274 $186.80
Invoice 062502
Transaction Date 611212002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,621.23
-3008-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
06/19/02 4:50 PM
Page 17
Current Period: June 2002
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
280 CEMETERY FUND
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
455 TIF 1-2
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$25,5OO.57
$4,336.90
$40.01
$692.88
$14,098.40
$4,013.20
$18,412.66
$40,286.62
$95,364.93
$604.00
$203,350.17
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$203,350.17
$203,350.17
-3009-
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
CITY OF MOUND
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
TO:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
BONNIE RITTER
SUBJECT: PUBLIC GATHERING PERMITS
DATE: June 20, 2002
Fishers of Men - Minnesota Division, has submitted application for two fishing
tournaments at Mound Bay Park. The dates are: August 3 and August 17, from 1:30
p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
They are requesting that the $300/day fee be waived as they are a non-profit
organization. I've enclosed a copy of their applications and a brochure.
_printed on recycled paper
3010-
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC GATI:r~,RING PERMIT
Use of a public park or commons by any group conSisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use-is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the
ability of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIOUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR
BUILDINGS -
Group is to remove all litter and trash and Provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park
PERI,fl'I' FEE: $300/DAY _~0,0~. _(~ ~-~_~')~r(x~¢ C)~C~'\'~(.~
I
Date of Use ~1 310
Area to be Used/(~¥-~d
Time Frame
Intended
Expected Attendance
47
Representative's Name ~
Address ~t~
Telephone No. Z~m~: ~
Drivers License Number
Work:
-3011 -
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNKSOTA 55364
PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT
Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use 'is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the
ability of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR
BUILDINGS.
Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park
PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY'~X~, (-~ C~ ~C')~P)~ (~~'[~~
Date of Use ~!
Intended Use V'4e_i(i~-
Expected Attendance~ ~ -~)
Organization~ ~ .~"~
Drivers License Number
)
-3012-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
June 17, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor & City Council
FROM: Jim Fackler, Parks Director
REF: Proposed Rip-Rapping project for 2002.
In the 2002 Docks Budget $35,000.00 was earmarked for rip
rapping. The Dock & Commons Advisory Commission (DCAC) has
reviewed prospective work sites along with staff and have
recommended two locations. These two sites being the Twin
Park access and the Cresent Park access.
As you will note from the May 16, 2002 DCAC draft minutes
the commission's motion recommends complete rip-rapping of
the Twin Park access and the balance of the budget used to
rip-rap as much as possible at the Cresent Park access.
The city has received two quotes from three contractors that
were invited to look at this project. The lowest quote is
from Dock & Lift, Inc. at $65.00 per LnFt. The other quote
was from Concept Landscaping at $85.00 per LnFt (See
attached information).
Staff's recommendation is to accept the Dock & Lift, Inc.
quote at $65.00 per LnFt and do the Twin Park access
completely and do as much of the Cresent Park access as the
budget will allow.
With the City Councils approval I will schedule this work to
be completed this Summer or early Fall at a cost of not to
exceed $35,000.00 (Approximately 538 LnFt of rip-rap) to the
Dock Fund.
_Drinted on recycled paper
3014-
DOCK & LIFT, INC.
Tim & Mike Latterner
3790 Meadow Lane
Excelsior, MN 55331
Shop:
Office:
952/471-8343
952/474-7934
May 30, 2002
City of Mound
Attn: Jim Fackler
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364-1687
Proposal for Rip-Rap:
and Cresent Park Access)
We will furnish all equipment, labor and materials to place app'roximately 704 feet of
rip-rap to be measured upon completion.
We will provide any necessary permits.
704 feet rip-rap @ $65.00 per lineal foot ......................
$ 45,760.00
Thank you for the opportunity to give you a bid on this project. If you have any questions
or concerns, please give us a call.
Sincerely,
Tim Latterner
-3015-
FROM : Concept Landscapin9 PHONE NO. : 472 4118 Jun. 11 2002 08:10RM PI
Concept Landscaping, Inc.
3153 Priest Lanc, Mound, MN 55364
City of Motmd
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
att Jim Fackler
PROPOSAL
MN. Contrae.~r LIC. #000~8997
Shor~l|n~ Cou~ruc~or Bond ItLF0 I
(9~2)472-4118
6/10/2002
2002 Pro~ose~,, ~.RaV
.In .s.s~l! 6" to 24" Fieldstone Bould~ Rip-Rap, ineludos DNR approved filt~ fabric Mirafi 600X (500X is
junlc ,it rips), M/q/DOT 360 l-Bp~lter rOck, Class 4 Fieldstone Boulders along the following shorelines:
*Winter price: You sav~ a lot of money if'you release your projects pr/or to the end of September each
year so that we o. an prel~am the project in Octobor/Novembor and install the project in D~.emb~r/January.
Note: Out comp,titioo has b~m known to mix Re&Rock with their natal fieldstone and also use red
rock for their 3601-B filter rock so as to b~ mom oompetitive. We use "only" natural fi,ldstonc. Our 3601-
B filter rock iS also natural fieldstone.
The above prices ar~ based on 200' or more and must bo contracted by O~tobor 2002 for install no later
than January 2003.
We propose ue,e~y to fumi,h material and labor--e, oml~le~e in act, ordam:~ wRb the ~bo¥,
Terms: Payment due upon Completiolt of each above listed project.
All mamrial is gnamntcod m bo aa .np~offlcd. All work to bo complexed in a workmmmhip I~e mann~ ammnlin~ Lo Standard prat}tie.~. Any
alt~ratlom or deviation% vovbal or writt~'n, from the abova .nlmoifieatinna involving ~ e_av~ ar~ ~ara and mil l-n~ome an axnra char~
ovea' and above tim c~ma~. A. II agrm~enm eonfingout upon ~trlk~n, aeeldeam or dalays h~.youd our control. Ownar ~o eany tim tornado
and oth, r necessary insurance, Our workors ar~ fully covar~d by workers comp~safion insurance.
C_~t l.~scapiog
A~epVJmc~ of Propoml-Tlm above lario~q, .~T~cifieations and conditions
are .~ti.~faetory and hcxel~ acee~t~d. You are authorized to do fl~e work
a.~ sl~x:ificd. Payment will bo marlo a.q outlinod
-3016-
Minutes of the Mound Dock and Commons Advisory Commission' l~ay 16, 2002
In 2001 the Dock budget saw charges for the Woodland Point Settlement which
included new docks/stairways, engineering and League of Minnesota insurance
deductible. Also there was the expense for the Dock LoCation Mapping of the Shoreline
to establish the cities claimed lineal footage for the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District. These items are better clarified in the individual balance sheet.
The Commission would like to see 2001 "actual fees" not "proposed fees".
On June 1st, staff will begin the budget process.
8. REVIEW: PROTECTION OF THE RIP-RAPPING FROM
SNOWMOBILES.
Avalon Park received an application of fieldstone rip-ra
asked that a wooden ramp be constructed over the
the winter seasons of 2001-2002.
'he Dock Commission
by snowmobiles for
This was completed in the attempt to protect
snowmobile traffic. Staff also constructed a seai
onto the ramp. From this being :~ne
One indicating it kept the traffic to the
looked ugly.
displacement by
to direct the snowmobiles
staff' received two comments.
one against saying that it
Staff did have to repair the
use.
'inter due to the wood ramp braking from
Staff does not have a
determination can
thei~e is similar rip-rapping and feels no
e. No problem re-installing this annually.
Commissioner was on and believed this was a good job and looked good.
9. DISCUSS: FOR THE TOUR AT 6:30 P.M, .~
Commissioners toured the five locations recommended for rip-rapping, Waterbank
Common, Centerview Road, Crescent Park, Twin park and Idelwood Access. All of
these sites are locations where rip-rapping was completed in the past; however due to
erosion or red rock breakdown repair is needed. Staff recommends this work be
completed after the ice is out in April 2003. In the 2002 budget this is $35,000.00
designated for rip-rapping. The estimated cost range per lineal foot for the field stone
specification that was approved by the City'Council and Do DCAC'will run between
$65.00 and $90.00 per lineal foot based on accessibility form land or water.
Staff is requesting the CommisSion to prioritize the list above or recommend other sites
for rip-rap repair.
-3017-
Minutes of the Mound Dock and Commons Advisory Commission IVlhy 16, 2002
Hanus toured these areas previously and stated his list of what does and what does not
require rip-rap. Idelwood Access no need for work, no deterioration. Centervi~w Road
only needs a portion of rip-rap. Waterbank no need for work. Crescent Park only needs
a portion of rip-rap. At Twin Park the entire area needs rip-rapping. Did not tour
Idelwood.
Park Director Fa.ckler explained that it depends upon the site for the cost of the work per
foot. Idelwood has runoff from the street and is deteriorating from the street as well as
the lake. The Storm Water Management Fund should provide some of the cost for
Idelwood since the streets are in disrepair.
Commissioner Eurich stated he feels Centerview is in the most disrepair.
Both Chair Funk and Commissioner Goldberg agree Twin
However a portion of Centerview and a portion of
in the most disrepair.
use rip-rap.
Commissioners came to a concession that Twin
Idelwood Access should not be completed until
b ~pleted and
issue is
Staff recommends completing one area and nol
responsible for minimum maintenance
of the City for stacking and repairs.
:aling. Dock holders are
ultimately it is the responsibility
Hanus stated that it is a City Ordi
maintain rip-rap. Fackler indic~
dock holder and it is
of the .dock holder to
aintenance is the responsibility of the
for repairs and maintenance.
The Commission supports cc
cost of repairing no
proportioned
one and not piece-mealing. Also agrees the
~s involved with some of theses areas should be
Fackler stated th
built on a bog. The i~
o there was repair work on Centerview. The road is
usually push this area.
Commissioner Eurich would like to see Twin Park rip-rapped in its entirety'and Crescent
as far as the budget allows.
MOTION by Funk second by Goldberg to direct staff to proceed with
complete rip-rap of Twin Park 100% Twin Park and as rip-rap at Crescent
~ park as budgeted funds allow.
MOTION carried unamiously.
-3018-
CITY OF MOUND
53.'11 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
May 24, 2002
TO: Prospective Contractor
FROM: Jim Fackler, Parks Director
SUBJECT: 2002 Proposed Rip-Rapping
Listed below are the rip-rapping locations that the City of
Mound is seeking quotes for completion Summer/Fall of 2002.
PROPOSED SITES; Approx. LnFt
A) Twin Park Access .2 ........................... 100 LnFt
B) Cresent Park Access .......................... 540 LnFt
TOTAL = 640 LnFt
Ail of the above sites are in need of a complete
reconstruction of the shoreline erosion protection. The work
is not limited to applying the new rip rap but may reqUire
removal/adjusting existing rip rap to meet Minimal
Specifications. Please provide a quOte based on the lineal
footage for rip rap as described in the Basic Specification
Sheets provided with this correspondence.
Be advised that the City retains the right to reduce the
site/lineal footage listed above so as to meet current
budget limitations. All required permits from governing
agencies must be obtained by the contractor prior to work
i~- 3019-yc'e~paper
commencing. Ail quotes must be received by the City of Mound
no latter then noon on June 14, 2002 and will have to be
approved by the City council.
If you would like to have staff visit the proposed sites
with please feel free to contact me at 952-472-0611
Attachments; Minimum Rip Rap Specification Description
Location Map
-3020-
February. 6, .2001 (Revised)
CITY OF MOUND
MINIMAL SPECIFICATION
FOR RIP RAP INSTALLATION
DESCRIPTION ..
Rip-rap is a term for the control of
erosion along the shoreline of a lake
which incorporates DNR standards.
STONE ........ MnDot Spec. Class 4 (6" to 24" diameter
with 1/2 the weight of the stone being 12"
diameter or less) Quarried Fieldstone.
BASE ROCK .... Filter blanket material layer of
MN/DOT 3601-B.
FILTER
FABRIC ....... Geotextile Filter Fabric Mirafi 500X or
equivalent.
c;
PLACEMENT .... Sort and lay all rock to achieve a. flat
smooth 3:1 top slope. The toe rock shall
be placed so as to create .a sharp edge so
tha~ ice can slide over it.
CROSS SECTION:
Crass 4 Quarried Feildstone R~p RaI
Base Rock HN/DOT 3601-B
Fi[tier-Fabric
The Brlmeyer Group, Inc.
EXECUTIVE SEARCH CONSULTANTS
Fifty South Ninth Avenue, Suite #101
Hopkins, MN 55343
May 28, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Kandis:
Thank you for inviting The Brimeyer Group to submit a proposal to work with City of Mound in the
recruitment and selection of a Police Chief.
Responsibility for the assignment will be under the direction of James Brimeyer assisted by the staff of
The Brimeyer Group. Information regarding The Brimeyer Group, our staff, clients, and references
are included.
It is our objective to present candidates whose background and experience will best suit the needs of
the community and the organization. We use a thorough process to develop a Position Profile that
will accurately reflect the requirements of the position and present candidates that will match with the
Profile.
Thank you for your consideration. We very much look forward to working with the City of Mound in
what must be considered a most challenging and exciting effort.
Very truly yours,
President
-3023-
(952) 945-0246
· fax (952) 945-0102
Police Chief
of the
City of Mound, Minnesota
A PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY:
THE BRIMEYER GROUP, INC.
EXECUTIVE SEARCH CONSULTANTS
FIFTY SOUTH NINTH AVENUE, SUITE 101
HOPKINS, MN 55343
May29,2002
-3024-
City of Mound
Page One
Introduction
The Brimeyer Group is a full-service executive search and consulting firm working primarily in the
public sector to assist boards, councils, and commissions in recruiting individuals for top management
positions including managers, administrators, department heads, and other key staff positions. We
also are experienced in recruiting administrative staff for non-profit organizations and private
corporations. In addition, we provide services in the areas of team building, strategic planning, goal
setting, and organizational and management studies for selected clients.
Our approach to executive search promotes maximum input from our client in the search process.
The client is the final authority in the selection of candidates.
We maintain continual contact with the client throughout the search and keep the candidates informed
as the search progresses. In addition to our milestone meetings with the City Council, we will provide
periodic updates to keep you informed of our progress.
The Brimeyer Group, Inc., is committed to accurately portraying all candidates to the City. Likewise,
we strive to accurately represent the position to candidates to prevent unrealisfc expectations.
Consultant
James L. Brimeyer
Jim has twenty years of experience in public sector management and has been involved in executive
search since July, 1988. Mr. Brimeyer served in public administration in four cities, three as City
Manager, including his last position in St. Louis Park, Minnesota (1980 to 1988), with a budget of $28
million and 230 employees. He also served in Worthington, Ohio (1974 to 1980), and Wood Dale,
Illinois (1971 to 1974). He began his career as Assistant City Manager in Park Ridge, Illinois after
obtaining a Master's degree in Public Administration from Northern Illinois University. His
Bachelor's degree is from Loras College in Dubuque, Iowa.
Mr. Brimeyer is past President of the Ohio City Management Association. He belongs to the
International City Management Association, the Metropolitan Area Management Association, the
Minnesota City Management Association, the National Forum for Black Public Administrators, and
the Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association. He is active in the TwinWest Chamber of Commerce.
He is Past President of the St. Louis Park Rotary and Past President of the Rotary Foundation Board.
In January, 2000 Mr. Brimeyer began his second four-year term as City Council Member at-large in St.
Louis Park, Minnesota.
-3025-
City of Mound
Page Two
The Search Process
We anticipate the search for the Police Chief for the City of Mound will take from three to four
months (90 to 120 days) from the time we are retained to the time the City Manager makes an offer.
This is somewhat dependent on the time required to screen candidates, and the availability of the City
Manager to review consultant reports and conduct final interviews. After further discussions with the
City Manager we will prepare a timetable and develop a target date for the reporting of the new Police
Chief.
PHASE I
Position Profile
A successful search begins with a thorough definition and agreement by the City on each aspect of the
position to be filled. During this initial phase, our consultants will meet individually with the City
Council, City Manager, some Department Heads, and police staff to learn more about your goals and
objectives. We would also propose to confer with other individuals or groups that have knowledge
about the position. This may include consultants used by the City and others who have worked with
and for the organization. Critical factors to be determined include posidon responsibility and
authority; reporting relationships; educational and experience requirements; personal and leadership
qualities; and management style.
Of equal importance to the success of the search is identifying the community priorities and
environment in which the Police Chief must function. We would expect to meet with selected
representatives from the community to further assess the climate within which the selected candidate
will most effectively perform. This may be accomplished through individual interviews or through a
public forum.
During this Phase, we will pay considerable attention to establishing organizafonal goals and priorities
for the position. The identification of priorities serves a two-fold purpose: It assists the hiring
authority in developing a consensus on what is important for the organization and it alerts potential
candidates to the important issues of the organization.
Prior to our meetings we will supply an Ideal Candidate Profile Survey to assist the interviewees in
assembling their ideas on what should be included in the Position Profile.
As a result of the meetings we will reach an understanding of the critical specifications of the position
and we will draft a Position Profile. A great deal of emphasis is placed on the agreement of this
analysis. Without this information, it is difficult to determine how potential candidates will affect the
City's plans and organizational team. The final Position Profile, after approval by the City, becomes
the document against which we evaluate prospective candidates.
-3026-
City .of Mound
Page Three
PHASE II
Place Announcements - Recruit Candidates
After the Prof'de is approved, we will conduct a comprehensive program to contact candidates and
determine sources of candidates. In addition to placing announcements in the appropriate
professional and trade journals, we will announce the position on the Intemet and on our Web Page.
We will utilize our local, statewide, and regional contacts to identify potential candidates. We will
identify comparable organizations from which key individuals can be contacted. Often we are able to
identify candidates from similar assignments who may be appropriate for the position. Because the
most qualified candidates are often not in the job market and do not respond to traditional advertising,
we will directly recruit specific individuals with established patterns of talent, stability, and success.
Our web site located at: www.brimgroup.com will allow candidates to access the Position Profile and
learn more about the position and the community.
Review Resumes and Screen Candidates
Following the application deadline, we will screen each applicant's experience and background against
the Position Profile. After evaluating and comparing each application, we will compile a list of
candidates for further consideration. We will conduct thorough, one-on-one interviews with the most
promising individuals. Our staffwill make every effort to conduct face-to-face interviews with these
candidates. Our in-depth evaluation and appraisal techniques will cover issues such as work
experience, education, professional development and achievement, career objectives, accomplishments,
suitability, and specific interest in the position. We pay particular attention to behavior patterns and
management style that most closely reflect the needs of the Mound community and the organization.
Progress Report
From these interviews, we will select the most qualified individuals to present to the City. We will
prepare a Progress Report that will provide information on the candidates whose backgrounds most
closely meet the requirements of the position. This Progress Report will provide specific information
on educational and work history; accomplishments and growth potential; strengths and possible
limitations. We will personally deliver and review this report with the City Manager. On the basis of
this review, finalist candidates will be selected. Also at this time we will propose a schedule for
interviewing the candidates and discuss the compensation issues of the new Police Chief. The
Brimeyer Group will conduct credential and reference checks on three finalist candidates (additional
reference and credental checks will be billed at $575 per candidate.) We will attempt to have this
information available prior to the interviews.
PHASE III
It is our understanding, the City of Mound will oversee the interview and selection process and
negotiate the compensation package. Resumes and cover letters will be provided by The Brimeyer
Group for each selected candidate. The Brimeyer Group will be responsible for notifying all
applicants of their status to this point.
-3027-
City of Mound
Page Four
Costs
EXPENSES
The Brimeyer Group, Inc., will bill expenses directly related to the assignment. Necessary expenses
include announcements, web site, travel, meals and lodging, long distance telephone, postage, printing,
credential verifications, courier service, and administrative expenses. Our expenses for this
assignment are estimated to be $1,500 to $2,000. This estimate does not include any costs associated
with candidates' expenses for the final interview.
FEE FOR SERVICE
To complete Phases I and II of the assignment, we propose a fee of $14,500. The fee includes the
following services:
Phase I
Meet with the City Council, City Manager, Department Heads, key staff, and others
Meet with selected representatives from the community and/or conduct public forum
Develop Position Profile
Present Profile for approval
Phase II
Place Announcements
Direct Recruiting
Review Resumes
Screen and evaluate candidates
Prepare and present Progress Report
Conduct credential and reference checks
One-third of the fee is due upon signing this agreement. The balance of the fee will be invoiced after
presentation of the Progress Report. In the event the City terminates this agreement during the search,
we will retain the progress payments to that point.
J~q'es-l~. Brimeyer
President
The Brimeyer Group, Inc.
Date
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
City of Mound
Date
-3028-
H A
RTER
E D
470 Pillsbury Ccntcr
200 South Sixth Strcct
Minneapolis MN 55402
(612) 337-9300 tclcpho,~e
(612) 337-9310 fax
htr p://www, ke,medy-gravcn .cmn
June 20, 2002
JOHN B. DEAN
Attorney at Law
Direct Dial (612) 337-9207
Email: j dean~kennedy-graven.com
Kandis M. Hanson, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Participation in Employee Selection Process.
Dear Kandis:
At a recent meeting with Mayor Meisel, it was suggested that I prepare a letter to you that outlines
the responsibilities and the limitations of the various "decision makers" as it relates to the employee
selection process. I use the term "decision makers" here to mean the city council and the city
manager because they are the two "official" participants in any employment selection process.
Obviously, input from other groups and individuals may be important, but the ultimate decision
does not lie with them.
The Mayor's suggestion comes in the context of the selection process for a new police chief.
Because no other city appointment will have a more significant impact on the public than the
selection of a police chief, it is important that there be broad-based participation in the process; and
certainly involvement by the city council. However, it is likewise important that all the participants
understand that their participation is subject to limitations.
Fortunately, these issues are addressed by state law.
To begin, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.611 contains the following general statement applicable
to Optional Plan B cities such as Mound:
The council shall exercise ttie legislative power of the city and determine all matters
of policy. The city manager shall be the head of the administrative branch of the
govemment and shall be responsible to the council for the proper administration of
all affairs relating to the city.
This statement is amplified later in the statute when it addresses the role of the city manager and the
city council in hiring decisions. First, in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.651, the following is listed
as a power of city managers in Optional Plan B cities:
JBD-216529vl
MU220-1
-3029-
Kandis M. Hanson
June 20, 2002
Page 2
The city manager shall appoint upon the basis of merit and fitness and subject to any
applicable civil service provisions, and except as herein provided, remove the clerk,
all heads of departments, and all subordinate officers and employees; ...
Finally, Minnesota Statutes.., Section 412.661 contains the following admonition to city councils:
Neither the council nor any of its members shall dictate the appointment of
any person to office or employment by the manager, or in any manner interfere with
the manager or prevent the manager from exercising judgment in the appointment of
officers and employees in the administrative service; but this shall not be construed
to prohibit the council from passing ordinances for establishing a merit system
governing city employment. Except for the purpose of inquire, the council and its
members shall deal with the control the administrative service solely through the
manager, and neither the council nor any of its members shall give orders to any
subordinate of the manager, either publicly or privately.
Many councils are not happy to be so limited. After all, they were elected to deal with and resolve
community issues; and isn't the hiring of the police chief an important community issue?
Clearly it is an important decision, and clearly the council must have a role in the process. The
important points to remember is that the council may not:
2.
3.
4.
o
Select the new chief.
Direct or influence you concerning whom to select.
Interfere with the process for selection, or conduct its own process.
Make representations to any candidate or possible candidate about their chances for
selection.
Discourage any candidate or possible candidate from participating in the process.
Even with those limitations to the council's participation, I know you are sensitive to the need to
appropriately involve the council in the process. The selection you make will reflect on the council.
Respectfully yours,
JBD-216529vl
MU220-1
-3030-
April ,30,2O02
Mound Marketplace, LLC
Attention Larry Olson and Brian Pellowski
4969 Olson Memorial Highway
Golden Valley MN 55422
Mound Market Place
New Mound Liquor Store
Dear Sirs:
This letter will serve as a non-binding letter of intent regarding the proposed new municipal liquor
store in the proposed Mound Market Place. This will not be a legally-binding agreement, but will
only serve as the outline for a legally-binding agreement to be entered into by Mound Marketplace,
LLC ("MMP") and the City of Mound (the "City").
1. Contract for Deed. MMP and City will enter into a contract for deed (the
"Contract for Deed") whereby MMP will construct a new municipal liquor store (the "Store") in the
proposed Mound Market Place and convey the Store to the City. The Store will consist of the
ground and building and all ~mres and equipment necessary to commence operating a retail liquor
store (exclusive of inventory and. cash registers). The interior finish will be completed in
accordance with design as approved by Tushie and AsSOciates. The Store will be approximately
5,100 square feet on the main level and 5,100 square feet on the lower level and will be attached to
an approximately 32,600 square foot grocery store located at the Northwest Corner of County
Roads 15 and 110. The City will have exterior signagein an agreed-upon format consistent with the
signage policy for Mound Marketplace. The purchase price under the Contract for Deed will be
agreed-upon price not to exceed One Million Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand and no/00
Dollars ($1,275,000). NO interest shall accrue under the Contract for Deed as long as there is no
default thereunder.' The City shall make periodic installment payments under the Contract for Deed
corresponding to progress with construction of the Store, subject to customary draw requests and
certifications. The Contract for Deed will provide for a one hundred eighty (180) day cancellation
period. Upon completion of the Store,. all remaining payments Under the Contract for Deed shall
become due and, upon the City making such payments, MMP shall convey fee title to the Store.
2. Common Interest Community. The Store shall be one of two (2) units comprising a
common interest planned community, the other unit consisting of the remainder of Mound Market
Place. The association for the community (.the "Association") shall maintain the exterior of all
structures and all common areas. All Association costs shall be allocated based upon square footage
of building space, except that basement square footage used solely for storage shall not be counted.
No exclusive or reserve parking rights shall be granted. No unit owner shall have the. right to
subdivide its unit. The City shall waive the statutory disclosures and warranties under Chapter
5'i5B. During such time as the City owns the Store, the Association's board of directors shall at:all
times consist of three (3) members, one of which is the City Manager. No amendment may be
made to the CIC's'eonstituent documents, including the declaration, without unanimous consent of
all unit owners with respect to, among other provisions, sale or encumbrance of common area,
L~Wo212~gSv~
MU200-~
-3031-
alteration of common area (including parking), and the aforementioned provision regarding
membership on the board of directors.
3. Use Restriction. As long as the Store is being operated as an off-sale liquor
store, no other portion of Mound Market ?lace shall be permitted to conduct the off, sale selling of
alcoholic bev~ges of any ~nd, including wine and beer. The foregoing restriction shall be
contained in a recorded restrictive covenant enforceable by both the Association and the City.
4. Option to Purchase. MMP (or successor owner of the remainder of Mound
Market Place) shall have an option to purchase the Store for fair market value which may be
exercised for a specified period of time after the City elects to sell the Store, If the holder of the
option fails to timely exercise the option and the City sells the Store to a third party, the option shall
terminate.
If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate below and remm a copy of this letter by April
2002.
City of Mound
The foregoing non-binding letter of intent is acceptable.
Mound Marketplace. LLC
By
arry Olson
IFs Chief Financial Officer
LMW-212985v3
MU200-96
-3032-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
TO:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
BONNIE RITTER
RE:
APPLICATION FOR LIVE MUSIC
DATE: June 20, 2002
Application has been received from Sue and Dan Pilling, 3005 Brighton Blvd., for a live
band from 7 p.m. to 12 midnight for a 40th birthday party to be held on Friday, August 2,
2002.
Please note the request is until midnight. The City Code governing live music doesn't
state hours of operation, however, under the ordinance regarding noise in residential
districts, it states: (920.15, Subd. 1) No person shall, between the hours of 10:00 p.m.
and 7:00 a.m., con.qregate because of or participate in any party or gathering of people
from which noise emanates of a sufficient volume so as to disturb the peace, quiet or
repose of persons residinq in any residential area.
The applicant has a copy of this ordinance and stated that all of the neighborhood will
be invited to this party and doesn't believe that the music will disturb the neighborhood
residents.
_printed on recycled paper
3033-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
LIVE MUSIC OR CONCERT
o'rt'c
LOCATION OF CONCERT:
TYPE OF CONCERT: ~/~
TIME PERIOD OF CONCERT:
CHAIRPERSON OR
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS: 3OO ~-' [~~
TITLE:
ADDRESS:
HOME PHONE #:q~2-/t'~Z---<~.~t-~ HOME PHONE #:
~WoRK PHONE #: [~[~/'~,~t~_ q ()... [ WORK PHONE #:
Date
Applicant's Signature
-3034-
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE NO. -2002
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 350.310, 350.455,
350.640, AND 350.670 OF THE CITY CODE AS THEY
RELATE TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
The City of Mound does ordain:
Subsection 350.455 is hereby amended to read as follows:
350.455
Essential Services and Buildings.
Subd. 1 Essemial services and public utilities, except buildings, shall be permitted
as authorized and regulated by State law and the City Code, it being the intention that
such are exempt from the application of this Chapter when located within public
easements.
Subd. 2. Essential Service Buildings. Essential Service Buildings are not subject to
the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements contained in this Chapter.
Essential Service Buildings are conditional uses in all districts; and may not be
constructed or substantially renovated unless a conditional use permit is issued in
accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. The City may place design, size, location
and coverage restrictions on any conditional use permit, and may require that the coverage
and setbacks conform as close as practical to those otherwise required in the district.
Subsection 350.310 is hereby amended by adding the following:
350.310
Definitions
Subd. 48A. Essential Service Building. Any building or similar structure designed and
constructed to house or serve an Essential Service or public utility and necessary for the
operation or maintenance thereof. The term includes, without limitation, publicly owned
water well houses, sever lift stations, and water towers.
Subsection 350.640 and 350.670 are hereby amended by adding the following:
Section 350.640 and 350.670
Essential Service Buildings are a conditional use in all Zoning Districts.
Electric Substations are a conditional use in the I-1 Industrial Zoning District.
1
-3035-
Ordinance No. _-2002
Passed by the City Council this day of
Published in The Laker the day of
Effective on ,2002.
,2002.
,2002.
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
2
-3036-
Excerpts
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
June 3, 2002
Text Amendments - Essential Services and Buildings
Previously Planning Commission has discussed the zoning issues related to the proposed MCES
lift station relocation to the Balboa property. The lift station is permitted in the I-1 district but
must maintain a lot size of 30,000 square feet according to the zoning code. The parcel has less
than the required minimum. Over the next few years, the City will also be building new pump
stations and a new water tower which would not be permitted in the chosen locations according
to code. To correct this deficiency, we are considering zoning that pertains specifically to
essential services and buildings.
Mueller wanted to know what was being taken away from the code. Does the language that we
are adding give you the ability to put a sewer lift station on a lot smaller that 30,000 sf?. Gordon
said it did.
MOTION by Mueller, second by Burma, to move staff recommendation on Zoning text
amendments.
MOTION carded unanimously.
-3037-
MEMORANDUM
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
To: Mound Planning Commission and Staff
From: Loren Gordon, AICP
Date: May 30, 2002
Subject: Zoning text amendment - Section 350.445 essential public service buildings
As you will recall, we have discussed the zoning issues related to the proposed MCES lift station
relocation to the Balboa property. The lift station is a permitted use in the I-1 district but must
maintain a lot size of 30,000 square feet per the district minimums. The identified parcel will have
less lot area than the required minimum. Staff has discussed a number of approaches to address
this specific issue and presented a couple of alternatives at previous meetings.
Over the next few years, the City will also be building new pump stations and a new water tower
on the Chateau site which are in residential areas and would not be not permitted by current code.
To correct this deficiency, we are recommending an approach which would accommodate these
buildings in all areas of the City, recognizing they have been long time fixtures in some
neighborhoods. The proposed language reflects item #4 in the March 13, 2002 Memorandum
which is attached for your review.
The following are the proposed amendments indicated with the underlined text:
Section 350.455 Essential Services and Bniiding~.
Subd. 1 Essential services and public utilities, except buildings, shall be permitted as
authorized and regulated by State law and the City Code, it being the intention that such
are exempt from the application of this Chapter when located within public easements.
Subd. 2. Essential Service Buildin~:s. Essential Service Buildings are not subject.to
the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements contained in this Chapter.
Essential Service Building~ are conditional uses in all districts; and may not be constructed
.~..r~.s.~.u...b.~.s..t..a.~.n..t.~ia~w.~r.e.-n.~.~.~.v..a..t.~.e...d.~.~u~.n..~..e.~.s..s.~.a.~.c...~...n..d}.t.~..~...n...a.L~.u.~.s..e.~p...e.r~..m..i.t.~j~.s.~j~.s..s.~u~.e...d.~j~.n.~.a.~.c..c...~..r..cl.~.a.~.n..c...e.~..w.it...h.~.t...h..e..
provisions of this Chapter. The City may place design, size, location and coverag~
restrictions on any conditional use permit, and may require that the coverage and setbacks
conform as close as practical to those otherwise required in the district.
Section 350:310 Definitions
1 ,o North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Mimaesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 3.38-6838
-3038-
t~.2
Planning Commission and Staff
.~aray 30, 2002
Essential Service Building. Any. building or similar structure designed and constructed
to house or serve an Essential Service or public utility and necessary_ for the operation or
maintenance thereof. The term includes, without limitation, publicly owned water well
houses, sever lift stations, and water towers.
The final text revision is to identify electric substations as a conditional use in the I-1 district. At
some point in the future, Excel Energy may choose to upgrade the existing station across from the
Public Works facility on Lynwood, and we believe limiting its location to the industrial district is
appropriate.
If the Planning Commission concurs proposed amendments, the language as written or in some
modified form will be forwarded to the City Council as an ordinance amendment for public
hearing which would be scheduled for either June 25th or July 9th.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Mi~mesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax(612) 3~38-6838
-3039-
-3040-
~ n n ' 0 , , ~ ~ ~
~ n n 0 0 ' 0 , ~ ~
~( n n 0 0 , 0 , ~ ~C
· ( n n 0 0 , 0 , ~
~C n n 0 0 , 0 ~ ~C
~ n n 0 0 , 0 , ~ ~( 0 n ~ ~C
-3041 -
-3042-
-3043-
'3044-
~. n 0 0 0 0 n ~ n , 0 0 , n , , , n
' , 0 , ' 0 ~ ~ , n , , , , r,.) 0 n , ,
, , 0 , , C) , , , n , , , , 0 C) n , ,
, , n O 0 0 n 0 n , 0 , ~ n .... ~
, , n O 0 0 n r..) n ' 0 , < n , , , , 0
, , n 0 0 0 n 0 n , 0 , < n , , , ,
'3045-
~ PUBLIC HEA~ING NOTICE''
~. CITY OF MOUND * ~ ~
!~ MOUND, MINNESOTA ,.,
NOTICE OF A PUBUC HEARING
: · TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE*~il
AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 350:45~!
(ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND BUILD-
· ~ INGS) SECTION 350:310 (DEFINI-
TIONS) SECTION 350:640 (RESlDEN%
TIAL ALLOWABIiE USE CHART) ANp
, ~ 350:670 (BUSlNESS/1NDUSTRIAL;~--~ 7
.: A~L~WABLE USE~
'~ ~ NOTICE IS*HEREBY GIVEN that the
City Council of the City of' Mound,~
Minnesota w II ~ meet. ln';the ~Counc [
Chambers,: 53~i Meywood;~Roadlat:-7.;:~0i
p.m.~', o~n ~Tuasday,:[;June 25, 2002 ~.t9 ~o.r~
sider ame.ndments ,~'to Zon ng ~Code,
Section 350:455 (Essential Services and
Buildings),', 350:310(Definitions), *Zoning,
C°de :~, Sectlon.r ~ 1350:6f1.0 (Realdentja~
AIIowa61'e* Us~ 'Cha'rt) and'~.ontng-C0~e~
Sectior¢~'350:670 (BusineSs/indostria{~
Allowable ~ Use Chart)J~,~The - foil.owing[
am~e~dm~.,nt~ are ~{Opoce~d;~ ~.
are conditional uses in all districts; and
may not be ~onstructed or substantially
renovated unlesS a conditional use permit
is isSued In accordance with the provi-
sions .of this Chapter .The City may place
design, size, location and coverage
restrictions on any Conditional use permit,
and may require that the coverage and
setbacks conform as close as practical to
those otherwise required in the district,
,~ Section 350:310 Definitions: .
building or similar structure designed and
constructed to house or serve an
Essential Service or public utility and nec-
essary for the operation or maintenance
thereof· The term includes without limlta-
tion,;.~ublcly.owned-watar well hbusee,
several lift stations, and watar towers,
Section 350:640 (Reaidehtlel) ancl
350:670 (Business, end Industrial
Districts) Allowable U~ee:
Summary, Essential services build-
ings will be added to all residential (R-l,
R-lA, R-2, R-3J and business/industrial
(B-l, B-2 B-3, l-1) districts as a cond-
Section .' 350.455 ' ..~. ! Essential! ~ . lions use. Electrical substations are
Services.. and~ Bui dings?, ~ ~. ~"~.~ '~"._ .. a owed by conditional use in the I-1. dis-
~tflJ~l;~;~, ~0 ,~7-_ed~ an d ~ regul~ite a ava t
. a~. .m ,~. r~, a~e o ~cupon
tala~andtheC Code ltbel ~" ' -
~.n. that such are exempt fr~r~ ~
· ~ ty ~ ~ ~treq¥,.e~I at City Hall, All pemons appear.
~ lng ~t said hearing w th reference to the
~tjon of, this Chapter~hen located above' will be g yen the opportunity to be
,'?n,,~ !n.?u.,b!~ ' ~,,--::-~;-:,~... heard at th s meeting
"Subd 2~'~ Essential I ·'~ ~ Jill Norlander. Planning and
Essential
this Chapter.: E
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he
is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as THE
LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full
knowledge of the facts which are stated below:
A.) The newspaper has complied with all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable
laws, as amended.
B.) The printed Ordinance Amendments
which is attached was cut from the columns of
said newspaper, and was printed and published
once each week for 1 successive weeks.
It was first published Saturday
the 15 day of June 2002,
and was thereafter printed and published
every Saturday, to and including Saturday,
the __ day of
2002;
Authorized Agent
Suscribed and sworn to me on this
15
__ day of__June ., 2002.
By: '(~/~/~J ~ Notary Public
UaUC- MINNESOTA ~
~ ~MY (Jommissi°n Expires Jan' 31' 2005 ~'~
Rate Information
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space: $15.50 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $15.50.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.96 per inch.
Each additional successive week: $5.79.
-3046-
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS TO
SECTION 350:455 (ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND BUILDINGS) SECTION 350:310
(DEFINITIONS) SECTION 350:640 (RESIDENTIAL ALLOWABLE USE CHART) AND
350:670 (BUSINESS / INDUSTRIAL ALLOWABLE USE CHART) OF THE MOUND
ZONING CODE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet
in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 25, 2002 to
consider amendments to Zoning Code Section 350:455 (Essential Services and Buildings),
350:310 (Definitions), Zoning Code Section 350:640 (Residential Allowable Use Chart) and
Zoning Code Section 350:670 (Business / Industrial Allowable Use Chart). The following
m~endments are proposed:
Section 350.455 Essential Services and Buildings:
Subd. 1. Essential services and public utilities, except buildings, shall be permitted as
authorized and regulated by State law and the City Code, it being the retention that such
are exempt from the application of this Chapter when located within public easements.
Subd. 2. Essential Service Buildings. Essential Service Buildings arc not subject to
the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements contained in this Chapter.
Essential Service Buildings are conditional uses in all districts: and may not be
constructed or substantially renovated unless a conditional use permit is issued in
accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. The City may place design, size, location
m~d coverage restrictions on any conditional use permit, and may require that the
coverage and setbacks conform as close as practical to those otherwise required in the
district.
Section 350:31.0 Definitions:
Essential Service Buildine. Any building or similar structure designed and constructed
to house or serve an Essential Service or public utility and necessary for the operation or
maimenance thereof. The term includes, without limitation, publicly owned water well
houses, several lift stations, and water towers.
Section 350:640 (Residential) and 350:670 (Business and Industrial Districts) Allowable
Uses:
Summary. Essential service buildings will be added to all residential (R- 1, R- 1 A, R-2, R-
3) and business / industrial (B-l, B-2, B-3, I-1) districts as a conditional use. Electrical
substations are allowed by conditional use in the I-1 district.
Copies of the ordinance amendments are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All
persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be
heard at this meeting. ~~ A ff~ ~ ~ff~ j
Ji~ Norlander, Planning and
Inspections Secretary
Published in the Laker on June 15, 2002.
-3047-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-63
RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCESS FOR APPROVAL
OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council') of the City of Mound, Minnesota
(the "City") as follows:
I. Recitals.
(a)
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047,
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Mound, Minnesota (the "Authority"), is authorized to exercise
redevelopment powers; and
(b)
It has been proposed that the Authority establish a Redevelopment
Project Area as described herein (the "Redevelopment Project Area"),
in connection with construction of a new Public Safety Facility and
adopt the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area
(the "Plan"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law; and
(c)
The Authority has requested that the Council hold a public hearing on
the Plan, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.028,
Subdivision 1.
Public Hearinq. The Council will hold a public hearing on the Plan at a
meeting of the council to be held at City Hall on June 25, 2002, commencing
at 7:30 p.m. central time. The staff of the City is hereby authorized and
directed to cause the Notice of Public Hearing which is attached to this
Resolution to be published in the City's official newspaper not more than 30
and not less than 10 days prior to the scheduled hearing date.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Osmek and seconded by
Councilmember Brown.
The following voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Osmek and Meyer.
The following voted in the negative: None.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of May, 2002;,,/-)
~ttest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-3048-
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR
MOUND PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY PROJECT
DATED JUNE 25, 2002
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
1405830vl
-3049-
II.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION AND LEGAL BASIS ......................................................................... 1
A. Intent ...................................................................................................................... 1
B. Statement ................................................................................................................ 1
C. Redevelopment Area Boundaries .......................................................................... 1
D. Statement of Authority ........................................................................................... 1
E. Findings and Declaration ....................................................................................... 2
REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM .................................................................................... 2
mo
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Redevelopment Plan Objectives ............................................................................ 2
Land Use ................................................................................................................ 3
Redevelopment Activities ...................................................................................... 3
Financing Plan ....................................................................................................... 3
Development Standards ......................................................................................... 4
Environment Controls ............................................................................................ 4
Administration of Project ....................................................................................... 4
Modification of Plan .............................................................................................. 4
Exhibit A - Redevelopment Area Boundary Map
Exhibit B - Budget
1405830vl
i
-3050-
I. INTRODUCTION AND LEGAL BASIS
A. Intent
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound,
Minnesota (the "HRA"), proposes to establish a Redevelopment Project Area as
described herein (the "Redevelopment Project Area"), in connection with
construction of a new Public Safety Facility. The City of Mound, Minnesota (the
"City") will lease the Public Safety Facility from the HRA with an option to
purchase pursuant to a lease with option to purchase agreement. Revenue bonds
in the principal amount not to exceed approximately $6,800,000 are proposed to
be sold by the HRA to finance the redevelopment project costs. The revenue
bonds will be secured by the payments to be made by the City under the lease
with option to purchase agreement.
In the remainder of the Redevelopment Area the HRA proposes to facilitate, as
appropriate, private development by acquiring land and preparing it for private
development and by constructing public infrastructure improvements.
Statement
The City and HRA have determined that conditions exist within the
Redevelopment Area which have prevented further development of land by
private enterprise. It has been found that the Redevelopment Area is potentially
more useful and valuable for contributing to the public health, safety and welfare
than has been realized under existing development.
The development of these parcels are not attainable in the foreseeable future
without the intervention of the HRA in the private development process. The
HRA has prepared the Redevelopment Plan, which provides for the elimination
of these conditions, thereby making the land useful and valuable for contributing
to the public health, safety and welfare.
Redevelopment Area Boundaries
The boundaries of the Redevelopment Area are outlined on the Redevelopment
Area Boundary Map, Exhibit A.
Ail land included in the Project Area is within the legal boundaries of the City.
Statement of Authority
Minnesota Statutes Section 469.001-469.047 (Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Act) grants municipalities the authority to designate redevelopment
areas within the boundaries of the municipalities. Within these areas, the
municipality may adopt a redevelopment plan and establish a project consistent
with the municipality's public purpose. The project as contemplated by this plan
consists of a redevelopment project as defined in Section 469.001, Subdivision
1405830vl
-3051 -
II.
14. The lease with option to purchase agreement is authorized under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 465.71.
E. Findings and Declaration
The City and the HRA make the following findings:
The certain parcels of land in the project area would not be made available
for redevelopment without some public financial aid.
The redevelopment plans for the Redevelopment Area in the City will
afford maximum opportunity consistent with the needs of the locality as a
whole, for the redevelopment of the area by private enterprise.
o
The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for development of
the locality as a whole.
REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
A. Redevelopment Plan Objectives
The HRA, through implementation of this plan, seeks to achieve the following
objectives:
To provide for the least costly and most efficient Public Safety Facility for
the City required to provide adequate City services to the region.
To promote and seek the orderly and harmonious redevelopment of the
Redevelopment Area.
To provide logical and organized land use for the entire Redevelopment
Area consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Zoning
Ordinance of the City.
To promote the prompt redevelopment of property in the Redevelopment
Area with a minimal adverse impact on the environment.
o
To provide general design guidance in conjunction with a suitable
development contract in order to enhance the physical environment of the
area.
To provide adequate utilities and other public improvements and facilities,
to enhance the Redevelopment Area and the City for new and existing
development.
o
To assist the financial feasibility of private projects to the extent necessary
and where there is a corresponding level of public benefit.
1405830vl
2
-3052-
8. To enhance the overall economy of the City and surrounding area by
retaining current, and providing additional employment opportunities for
the residents of the City and surrounding community.
9. To increase the City's tax base by providing critical public infrastructure
improvements for the City.
10. To stimulate redevelopment and investment within the Redevelopment
Area by private interests.
Land Use
The proposed land use for the Redevelopment Area is primarily institutional city
owned and operated. Public owned and operated facilities necessary for the
public health, safety and welfare are permitted uses in the Redevelopment Area.
Redevelopment Activities
1. Acquisition
The City presently owns the property in the Redevelopment Area on which the
Public Safety Facility will be located. Other than that property, other property in
the Redevelopment Area will be acquired by the HRA if and when required to
facilitate redevelopment within the Redevelopment Area.
2. Relocation
It is not expected that any persons will be displaced as a result of this
Redevelopment Plan.
3. Public Safety Facility and Other Public Improvements.
The HRA proposes to cause the Public Safety Facility to be constructed and, as
appropriate, other public improvements within the Redevelopment Area.
The Public Safety Facility will be leased to the City under a lease with option to
purchase agreement.
Financing Plan
1. Project Budget
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a budget which details estimated redevelopment
costs associated with the construction, renovation and improvement of the Public
Safety Facility currently contemplated. The items of cost and the costs thereof
shown in the budget are estimated to be necessary based upon infom~ation now
available. It is anticipated that the items of cost and the costs thereof shown in
1405830vl
3
-3053-
Eo
Fo
Go
each category in the budget may decrease or increase, but that the total project
COSt will not exceed the amount shown above.
2. Source of Funds and Security
The City is entering into the lease with option to purchase agreement with the
HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 465.71. The lease with option to
purchase agreement is payable from general sources including taxes, and its
payment is not limited to a specific fund or specific source of revenues. Sources
of funds for any other public improvements include rates and charges,
assessments and other available funds of the HRA or City.
3. Bond Issue Details
The HRA will issue approximately $6,800,000 in public project revenue bonds to
finance the construction of the Public Safety Facility. No bonding has currently
been structured to finance costs of any other public improvements.
Redevelopment Standards
The HRA will consider among other things, the following factors when evaluating
redevelopment proposals for projects within the Redevelopment Area seeking
public assistance and support:
1. Degree to which redevelopment objectives are provided for or enhanced.
2. Consistency with this plan and the Mound Comprehensive Plan.
Environment Controls
It is presently anticipated that the proposed redevelopment in the Redevelopment
Area will not present major environmental problems. All municipal actions and
public improvements will be carried out in a manner that will comply with
applicable environmental standards. The environmental controls to be applied
within the area are contained within the codes and ordinances of the City.
Administration of Project
The Mound City Council has authorized the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City to be responsible for seeing that the contents of this
Plan are promoted, implemented and enforced.
Modification of Plan
A Redevelopment Plan may be modified at any time. The modification must be
adopted by the HRA and the City, upon notice and after the public hearing
required for the original adoption of the Redevelopment Plan.
1405830vl
4
-3054-
Changes that do not alter or affect the exterior boundaries and do not substantially
alter or affect the general land use established in the plan, shall not constitute a
modification of the Redevelopment Plan, nor require approval by the City.
1405830vl
5
-3055-
EXHIBIT A
Description of the Redevelopment Area and Boundary Map
See attached
1405830vl
A-1
-3056-
EXHIBIT B
Budget
Construction and related financing expenses
Debt Service Reserve
Capitalized Interest
Costs of Issuance
Discount Factor
Total Issue
$5,852,153
603,675
226,692
54,000
123,480
$6,860,000
B-1
-3057-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF MOUND,
MINNESOTA, CONCERNING THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA'S REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA PROPOSAL.
WHEREAS, the proposal by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the
City of Mound, Minnesota, to establish a Redevelopment Project Area as described
herein (the 'Redevelopment Project Area") in connection with construction of a new
Public Safety Facility and adopt the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project
Area (the "Plan"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, have been submitted to the
Planning Commission, City of Mound, Minnesota (the "Commission"); and
WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the Plan to determine the consistency of the
Plan with the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission, City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the Plan is consistent with the Mound Comprehensive Plan and the
Commission recommends approval of the Plan to the Mound City Council.
Adopted this 17th day of June, 2002.
Attest:
Planning Commission Secretary
Chairperson, Geoff Michael
-3058-
Excerpts
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 17, 2002
PRESENTATION RE: PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING BY CITY FINANCIAL ADVISOR
JIM PROSSER
The City Council has directed the use of revenue bonds for financing. State Statutes require that
the Planning Commission review and comment on the redevelopment plan so that the plan is
consistent with existing city code.
Planning Commission denied the request at their June 3, 2002 meeting.
MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Weiland, to reconsider the previous motion on June 3, 2002.
MOTION carried unanimously.
MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Weiland, to adopt the resolution concerning the housing and
redevelopment authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota's redevelopment project area
proposal. MOTION carried unanimously.
-3059-
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION APPROVING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Mound, Minnesota
(the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01 It has been proposed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and
for the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "Authority"), that the Authority establish a
Redevelopment Project Area as described herein (the "Redevelopment Project Area"),
in connection with construction of a new Public Safety Facility and adopt the
Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area (the "Plan"); all pursuant to
and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001
through 469.047; all as reflected in that certain document entitled in part
"Redevelopment Plan for Mound Public Safety Facility Project" dated June 25, 2002,
and presented for the Council's consideration.
1.02 The Council has investigated the facts relating to the Plan.
1.03 The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to
the adoption and approval of the Plan, including, but not limited to, a review of and
written comment on the Plan by the City Planning Commission, and the holding of a
public hearing thereon following at least 10 but not more than 30 days' prior published
notice thereof, as required by law.
Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Plan.
2.01 The Council hereby finds that the Plan conforms to the general plan for
the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole because the Redevelopment
Project Area is properly zoned for the intended uses, and the anticipated development
is in furtherance of long range plans of the City for that area; and that the Plan will afford
maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the
development of the Redevelopment Project Area and adjacent areas by private
enterprise because they will enable the Authority to provide and finance necessary
public facilities.
2.02 The Council further finds that the Plan is intended and, in the judgment of
this Council, its effect will be, to promote the public purposes and accomplish the
objectives specified in the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project Area.
Approval and Adoption of the Plan. The Plan, as presented to the Council on this
date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained
therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
-3060-
Resolution No. 02-
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council on June 25, 2002.
and seconded by
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
1405830vl
B-2
-3061 -
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT,
LEASE AGREEMENT AND CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City"), is authorized, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 465.71, to enter into lease purchase agreements;
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound,
Minnesota, a body corporate and politic (the "Authority") has agreed to enter into a
Lease Agreement (the "Lease") with the City pursuant to which the Authority will provide
for construction of a Public Safety Facility (the "Project") to be used by the City;
WHEREAS, in order to carry out the transaction, (1) the City will ground lease the
Project to the Authority pursuant to a Ground Lease Agreement executed by the City
(the "Ground Lease"), and (2) the Authority will lease the Project back to the City
pursuant to the Lease;
WHEREAS, the Authority will issue its revenue bonds (the "Bonds) to provide funds to
finance the Project pursuant to a Mortgage and Security Agreement and Indenture of
Trust dated as of July 1,2002 (the "Indenture") between the Authority and U.S. Bank
National Association, as mortgagee and Trustee, setting forth the form and details of the
Bonds and their issuance, pledging the rental payments derived from the Lease to the
payment of the Bonds and whereby the Authority grants to the Trustee a mortgage
interest in the Project with certain reservations as security for the Bonds;
WHEREAS, the City is an obligated person under the provisions of Rule 15c2-12 (the
"Rule") promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities and EXchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is therefore subject to
continuing disclosure requirements under the Rule and accordingly, the City will enter
into a Continuing Disclosure Agreement (the "Continuing Disclosure Agreement") with
the Trustee;
WHEREAS, the City is a governmental unit with general taxing powers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Mound.,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. Authorization of Bonds; Documents Presented. The Authority
proposes to issue its Public Safety Building Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 (City of
Mound, Minnesota Lease Obligation) (the "Bonds") payable from rental payments to be
made by the City under the Lease as hereinafter described. The Bonds shall be in an
aggregate principal amount of $6,860,000 (plus any amount representing original issue
discount) and shall bear interest at the rates as are prescribed by the Indenture. Forms
1405856vl
1
-3062-
Resolution No. 02-
of the following documents (collectively, the "Bond Documents") relating to the Bonds
and the Project have been submitted to the City Council and are now on file in the office
of the Clerk:
the Ground Lease;
(b) the Lease; and
(c) the Continuing Disclosure Agreement.
2. Approval and Execution of Bond Documents. The Mayor and the
Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute, and deliver, on behalf of the City
the Bond Documents in substantially the forms on file with the Clerk. All of the
provisions of the Bond Documents when executed and delivered as authorized herein
shall be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same extent as if
incorporated herein and shall be in full force and effect from the date of execution and
delivery thereof.
3. Approval of Indenture. The City hereby approves the Indenture and
the Bonds described therein (collectively the "Related Documents") in substantially the
forms submitted to the City.
4. Authorized City Representative. The Clerk and Clerk are each
hereby designated and authorized to act on behalf of the City as the City
Representative, as defined in the Indenture.
5. Furnishinq of Certificates and Proceedinqs. The Mayor and Clerk
and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the
Purchaser and Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City
relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to
show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books
and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all
such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall
constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein.
6. Modifications to Documents. The approval hereby given to the
various Bond Documents and Related Documents referred to above includes approval
of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such
modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary
and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the City officials authorized
herein to execute said documents. Said City officials are hereby authorized to approve
said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate
officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the
approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the
Mayor or Clerk, any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed on
behalf of the City may be executed by the Acting Mayor or the Acting Clerk respectively.
1405856vl
2
-3063-
Resolution No. 02-
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of June, 2002.
and seconded by
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
1405856vl
3
-3064-
Building Inspections Department
Review and Overview of Department Policies and Procedures
The Building Inspection Departments main purpose is to enforce all regulations of the State
Building Code and local ordinances, which are essential in protecting the health, safety and
welfare of the general public. The Department is also charged with maintaining the quality of
new and existing housing stock within the City of Mound through the uniform, systematic
applications of regulations to the built environment.
The Department reviews and inspects all new construction and remodeling projects within the
City. All building, plumbing and mechanical permits as well as contractor licenses and
Certificates of Occupancy are issued from the Inspections Department.
Office Hours:
To better serve the public, the Inspections Department has established office hours for the
Building Inspector.
8:00-9:00 A.M. Monday-Friday
12:00-1:00 P.M. Monday-Thursday
3:30-4:30 P.M. Monday-Thursday
During these times the Building Inspector is available to issue permits, assist the general public
or contractors and to answer questions on a variety of subjects.
Inspection Requests:
The State Building Code requires a 24-hour notice for inspection requests.
Inspections Schedule:
Morning inspections are provided by a contract inspection service on Monday through Thursday.
Afternoon inspections and Friday morning inspections are provided in-house.
Permitting Procedures
The following submittals are required of the permit applicant:
· Detailed plans
· Accurate survey
· Hardcover calculation worksheet
· Completed application
The submittals are then review by the following staffto ensure compliance:
· Building Official
· Community Development Director
-3065-
· Public Works Director
· City Engineer
After the proper approvals have been granted, the permit is issued to the applicant and
construction can commence. If the application is deemed incomplete written notice is given to
the applicant to re-submit certain portions of the application.
Permits such as re-roofing, re-siding, plumbing, mechanical, window replacement and other
small remodeling projects are issued over the counter.
On average submitted permit applications are usually turned around within about 5 business
days.
Field Inspections:
Once the permk has been issued, the Inspections Department performs the required field
inspections during the course of construction. Depending on the type or complexity of the
project, the Department may perform up to 12 site visits.
When the project has been completed a final inspection is required. A certificate of occupancy is
required for buildings that meet any of the following criteria:
New buildings
· Buildings that have been substantially altered or remodeled
· Buildings in which the primary use has been changed
· Buildings that have had a change in occupancy
Effective June 1, 2002 the Inspections Department has discontinued the issuance of temporary
certificates of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy are available for pick up 24-hours after the
final inspection. This allows staff an opportunity to check for any unresolved issues.
Projects:
The Inspections Department is in the process of updating the existing handouts and applications
to a more user-friendly, uniform format. They are also creating new handouts such as a residents
guide to permits and inspections and a guide to rental property requirements.
The Department is also continuing in their quest to streamline office procedures and to create a
tracking system for building permits and correction orders.
In order to better inform contractors of code requirements and department procedures, the
Inspections Department is creating uniform standard plan review comments to be issued with all
new residential and commercial building permits.
Starting spring of 2003, the Inspections Department will hold the first of its annual contractor
update meetings. The purpose of these meetings will be to explain and clarify building code and
ordinance changes and also changes in department policies and procedures.
-3066-
The Department will also provide articles for the local newspaper as well as the city newsletter
outlining the permit process and other general information for the public.
To ensure uniform enforcement of the codes, the Inspections Department is currently working on
a procedure manual for inspections and enforcement.
The Inspections Department is also working on ordinance proposals dealing with survey
requirements, landscape escrows and driveway surfaces.
Updates:
In mid May, the Department discontinued the use of a contract inspection service for plumbing
inspections and is now providing these services in house. We are also working on the transition
to bring all currently contracted building inspections services in house.
The Inspections Department will also be sponsoring an informal open house at City Hall. This
will provide an opportunity for contractors and the general public to meet the new Building
Official and discuss current and upcoming code and policy changes.
-3067-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
June 19, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor/City Council ~
Island Park Facility Task Force. /./~
Park & Open Space Advisory Commission-
FROM: Jim Fackler, Parks Director
REF: Island Park Hall
On Saturday June 15, 2002 a open house was given to invite
residents to voice a opinion on the future of Island Park
Hall.
Thirty two people, twenty five which were on the Westonka
Historical Tour, toured the hall.
These individuals were asked to vote on one of four options
listed below;
OPTION
1) NINETEEN VOTES
city of Mound should remodel Island Park Hall to be
used as a meeting/party rental space.
2) SEVEN VOTES
city of Mound should sell the Island Park Hall for a
minimal amount to a public service organization to be
used by the general public.
3) FIVE VOTES
City of Mound should demolish the Island Park Hall
building and improve the grounds to be part of Swenson
Park.
4) ONE VOTES
city of Mound should sell the property to a private
developer for remodeling or demolishing for new
construction.
Staff is asking for direction from the city Council on the
need for future input from the Island Park Facility Task
Force.
~_ 3Printed on recycled paper
068-
Jul1
-> 952472BG2B Xan&~s Hanson ~age BB2 §£ 0B3
I ershi in p ding
ervi uti s
June 3 - 7, 2002, no. 2
Met Council and DNR Provide First Look at
Natural Resource Inventory and Assessment
The Metropolitan Council, the Metro Di- they include 89,118 acres of forests, purpose and will be added by the Met
vision of the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources (MnDNR), and other
partners continue to work on a Natural
Resources Inventory and Assessment
(NRI/A) for the seven-county metropoli-
tan area, which will be incorporated into
the Met Council's work on Blueprint
2030. In the end, the assessment's
creators have said, "regionally significant
natural resource areas will be iden~ed
through a decision making process that
integrates science (survey data and re-
search-based information with GIS mod-
eling) and social values (e.g. local and
regional public policy, private land use
and land management decisions, etc.)."
On Tuesday, June 4, DNR staff released
the preliminary results of the scientific
portion of the NRI/A.
Based on natural resource data sources
uniformly available throughout the seven-
county metropolitan area, DNR staff
have identified 804,644 acres of natural
areas in the region, of which 230,445
have been found to be regionally signifi-
cant, according to preliminary results.
These regionally significant natural re-
source areas reflect 12 percent of the
total land area in the region. Broken
down into three major classifications,
94,236 acres of wetlands/watere and
46,212 acres of grasslands.
DNR staff have stressed that their work
is on a regional scale, and that more work
will have to be dona at the local level in
order to use the NRI/A for specific land
use planning and development decisions.
They estimate that the information nec-
essary to take it down to a local level is
currently available for approximately 35%
of the Twin Cities region. They are hop-
ing to receive a grant from the Legislative
Commission. on Minnesota Resources
(LCMR) to collect this level of data for the
remaining portions of the region.
A preliminary review of the identified sites
shows substantial concentrations of re-
gionally significant natural resource areas
in northern and eastern Anoka COuntyand
along the Minnesota River corridor.
Smaller concentrations are located
throughout the region, in each of the seven
counties. The preliminary maps show
very few regionally significant natural re-
source areas within the 494/694 beltway,
largely because the DNR has focused on
areas that provided habitat for plants and
animals. Natural resoume areas inside
the beltway primarily serve a recreational
Briefing for AMM Members:
Counoil.
Notably, approximately two-thirds of the
230,442 acres of regionally significant
natural resources are already protected
by regulation (mostly wetlands), public
ownership (local, state and regional
parks) or conservation easements. Much
of the regionally significant areas still to
be protected are adjacent to areas that
are already protected.
Still to come from a scientific standpoint
are identification of corridors that connect
patches of regionally significant natura
resources and identification of Ifle natu-
ral resource areas with the greatest po-
tential for restoration. From a policy per-
spec[ive, the Met Council still has a lot
of implementation details to work out.
Additional information regarding the
DNR's preliminary Natural Resource As-
sessment, including the draft definitions
for what is "regionally significant," as well
as a copy of draft polioies for inclusion in
the Met Council's Blueprint 2030, can be
found onlineatwww, amml45.org. Maps
and additional information will be avail-
able at _~wWw.datafinder_.or_q the week of
June 10.
Housing Needs Assessment and New Housing Goals for Cities
As reported in the last edition of the AMM News Fax, the Metropolitan
Council has announced that it plans to prepare an affordable housing Friday, June 14
needs assessment for the seven-county region that will be the basis for 11:30 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.
renegotiated housing goals with cities. Representatives of member cit-
les are invitied to attend a meeting to hear from the Met Council concern-
ing their plans, ask questions, outline concerns and provide input.
Lunch will be provided, so please RSVP by calling (651)215-4000.
League of MN Cities Bldg.
145 University Ave. W.
St. Paul, MN
:Tun EIG 2882_ 1S:S'P,:OS g~a Fax -> cJSZ'~?2B6,?,8 Ko.n&J.s Hcq. nsDn l~O. gC 883 Of B83
Association,o, f Metropolitan Municipalities News F, a,x June 3 - 7, 2002, no. ,2, ~, p, age 2 of 2
BWSR Considering Change in Local Water Planning Schedule
The Board of Water and Soil Re-
sources (BWSR) is in the process
of revising the rules for water plan-
ning in the metropolitan area. The
rules outline the process and con-
tents of the plans required of water-
shed districts and watershed man-
agement organizations, as well as
for the local water plans required of
cities.
In an attempt to ensure that local
water issues are more fully consid-
ered in the local comprehensive
planning process, BWSR is sug-
gesting a change in the schedule for
local water plans. Currently, cities
are required to complete a local wa-
ter plan within two years of the
completion of the last watershed
plan within their boundaries. In many
cases, especially where there are
multiple watersheds within a single
i~:ity, this has proven problematic be-
ause by the time the last watershed
completes its plan, the first water-
shed has already started on their next
one and the logical time for the city
to complete its plan has passed.
Therefore, BWSR is suggesting that
the schedule for city water plans no
longer be tied to the watersheds'
plans. Instead, cities would be re-
quired to complete their local water
plans a set number of years pdor to
the year set for comprehensive plan
updates. While the exact time span
A~fodation of
i'ictropolitan
Hunidpalitief
~4MM Fax News is fwced to ~ ~M ~y
ag¢~ and a~n~o~, i~l~pe ~.
~ ~oard ~mb~, Ple~e sh~ ~
w~ your ~yo~, ~uncll~mb~ ~d
st~W ~ them abm~t of i~o~t ~
ci~ issue,
147 ~]ttivetstty ~4~znue ~Fe~t
St. Pau~ MN 77105.2044
Phone: (6~l) 215-4000
Fa~: (651) 281-1299
E-mail: am~mml gXo~
between local water plans and local
comprehensive plans has not been
decided on, two years has been sug-
gested. Therefore, under this sce-
nario, cities would complete their lo-
cal water plans in the years ending
in 6 so that they would be available
to draw upon for the comprehensive
plans due in the years ending in 8. If
a set year is established for city wa-
ter plans, cities would be expected
to use whatever approved plans their
local watersheds have published at
that time.
Under the local water planning stat-
ute (section 103B.235) cities are re-
quired to submit their local water
plans, as stand alone documents, to
the Metropolitan Council for review
and comment at the time they are
completed. Additionally, the compre-
hensive planning statute (section
473.859) states that "a land use plan
shall include the water management
plan required by section 103B.235."
Given the added emphasis the Coun-
cil is placing on the protection of
natural resources in Blueprfnt 2030,
it seems likely that cities will have to
have local water plans in time for the
2008 comp plan updates,
ring Study Finds -esidential
Development Following Local Comp Plans
Staff at the Metropolitan Council have
compiled the results of the first year
of their Plat Monitoring Study, de-
signed to determine if residential de-
velopment in the Twin Cities region is
consistent with cities' comprehensive
plans. Results of the study show that
the development that is occurring is
consistent with local comp plans and
is often at greater densities than re-
quired under Metropolitan Council poli-
cies.
Twelve c~es volunteered to participate
in the study, including Blaine,
Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Hugo,
Inver Grove Heights, Lakeville, Maple
Grove, Ramsey, Savage, Shakopee,
Waconia and Wcodbury. The Coun-
cil collected copies of all final residen-
tial plats approved in these communi-
ties dudng 2001.
The 88 approved residential plats re-
sulted in 5,165 units of housing at a
net density of 3.8 unites per acre. Of
these units, 34 percent were single
family homes, 50 percent were
townhomes, 8 per0ent were apart-
ments and 9 percent were senior
housing. Sixteen of the 88 plats were
infill or redevelopment.
Overall, the 5,165 housing units fall
somewhere in the middle of the ranges
contained in local comprehensive
planS- equaling three times more than
the minimum called for and about 60
percent of the maximum allowable.
Additionally, the study found that 13
percent of the land included in the
study was subject to comprehensive
plan amendments. Land use changes
included rezoning from rural residen-
tial to urban residential, from commer-
cial and office land to medium or high
density multifamily residential, and
from Iow density or single family resi-
dential to medium density or multifam-
ily residential. These land use
changes resulted in an additional 678
housing unils that had not been called
for in the original comprehensive plans.
Finally, the study found that the 1,370
acres of land platted in these commu-
nities in 2001 represented approxi-
mately 3 percent of their vacant land.
For a complete copy of the study re-
sues, please call Kds Wilson at AMM
(651/215-4003).
-3070- TOTRL P. 03
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATIO,N DISTRICT'
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
7:00 PM, Wednesday, June 12, 2002
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster
· Annual Board Lake Inspection Tour (Wednesday July 10t!~)
READING OF MINUTES- 5/8/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
5/22/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items with a (*) will be approved in one motion
unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case '[he-'item .will be
removed from the consent agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING
· Lafayette Club, new multiple dock license application to expand a conforming
multiple dock facility from 23 to 24 Boat Storage Units (BSU's).
1. Public Hearing
2. Discussion and/or Consideration
LAKE USE & RECREATION
A. Three Rivers Park District, 2001 Water Quality of Lake Minnetonka presented
by John Baden;
B. Additional Business;
WATER STRUCTURES
A) (*) 2002 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2002 renewal
without change applications for Harrison Harbor Twinhome Association,
Grandview Point Association, and Minnetonka Power Squadron;
B) City of Deephaven, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of
special density license and temporary dock length variance applications;
c)
Ordinance Amendment, First reading of an ordinance extending a moratorium
on the erection, construction or establishment of new docks, moorings or
launching ramps on certain parts of Lake Minnetonka;
-3071 -
5. ADMINISTRATION
6. SAVE THE LAKE
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
8. OLD. BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
10. ADJOURNMENT
D) (*) Staff recommends Board approval of $188 of $250 application deposit
submitted for approved dock length variance;
E) Additional Business;
FINANCIAL
A) Audit of vouchers (6/1/02 - 6/15/02);
B) Review of draft 2003 LMCD Budget;
C) Additional Business;
EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
-3072-
DRAFT
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
7:00 PM. Wednesday, May 8, 2002
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Foster called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McUillan, Orono; Doug Babcock, Tonka
Bay; Orr Burma, Mound; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Sheldon Wed, Greenwood. Also
present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive'Director; Judd Harper, Administrative
Technician.
Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Tom
Skramstad, Shorewood; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Victoria has no appointed Board member.
CHAIR ANNOUNCMENTS, Chair Foster
Foster announced that the Board of Directors Working Session was scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on 5/15/02, with
departure planned from the residence of Paul Knudsen. The Working Session has been coordinated for a visual
inspection tour of two tributaries that lead into Lake Minnetonka, Six Mile and Long Lake Creeks. If Board members
or other interested parties are unable to attend the Board Working Session on 5/15/02, they can schedule an
alternative time with Knudsen to visually inspect Six Mile Creek.
Nybeck stated that he would send out a memo with the time and directions to the residence of Paul Knudsen for the
5/15/02 Board Working Session to the Board and other interested parties.
READING OF MINUTES. 4/24/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
MOTION: Knudsen moved, Suerth seconded to approve the minutes from the 4/24/02 Regular Board Meeting
as submitted.
VOTE: Ayes (7), Abstained (1, Babcock); motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda.
There were no comments from the public on subjects not on the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board
member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda.
Nelson moved, Burma seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items
so approved include: lC, 2002 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2002 renewal without change
multiple dock license applications for Meadowbrook Boat Club, City of Mound, and West Point Place HOA, 1D, City
of Minnetonka, staff recommends full refund of $250 deposit for dock length variance application, 4A, LMCIT
Liability Insurance, staff recommends that the Board do not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability
-3073-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District '
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002 Page 2
established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, and 5A, 2002 Liquor Licenses, staff recommends approval of renewal
wine and non-intoxicating liquor license applications for the charter boats, Fantasia, Holiday Fair and Holiday Fair II.
WATER STRUCTURES
A. Foxhill Association, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of variance application from
LMCD Code for dock length requirements.
Foster requested a correction of the spelling of his name in the draft Findings of Fact and Order. He asked if
there were comments from the Board on the draft Findings of Fact and Order.
Babcock asked how the total sliP square footage of 5,558 was arrived at.
Nybeck stated the number was from the staff memo, which was calculated from the proposed site plan. He
stated the proposed site plan would be a decrease in slip square footage from the 1978 Variance Order site
plan that was 5,680.
LeFevere notified the Board that there was an amended Findings of Fact and Order in their handout folder,
He stated that the applicant had requested that a sentence in the Order be added stating: "Upon receipt of
payment for three BSU's for the years 1986-2001, the facility shall be back licensed for those years and shall
have non-conforming status as to density at 16 BSU's." He stated that he had no objection inserting that
sentence into-the Order.
Foster entertained a motion for approval of the Findings of Fact and Order for Foxhill Association.
MOTION: McMilian moved, Suerth seconded to approve the amended Findings of Fact and Order, as
discussed by LeFevere, for approval of the Foxhill Association variance application from LMCD
Code for dock length requirements.
VOTE: Ayes (7), Nayes (1, Babcock); motion carried.
B. Chapman Place Marina, consideration of 2002 renewal, without change, multiple dock license application.
Foster asked for background on the proposed application from staff.
Harper made the following comments:
· Chapman Place Marina, has submitted a 2002 renewal without change multiple dock license application
for Board consideration. They are currently considered a legal, non-conforming multiple dock facility with
27 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on approximately 141' of continuous shoreline, which results in a BSU
density of 1:5'.
· Typically, staff presents renewal without change multiple dock license applications to the Board for
approval under the consent agenda, however, staff believed the Board should be aware of the special
requirements at this facility.
· Pdor to Chapman Place Madna, the facility was operated as a commercial marina in conjunction with
Surfside restaurant. With the sale of Surfside restaurant and the construction of a condominium,
questions were raised that it might constitute a conversion of use and would need to come into
compliance with all provisions of LMCD Code.
· A subsequent application was made by Waterford Properties Inc. in 1988 to continue the grandfathered
commercial marina status. The Board approved the request with a number of conditions outlined in the
-3074-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002 Page 3
2J22/89 Order. The conditions were made to ensure that no priority of rights to rent slip space shall be
given to members of Chapman Place Association Inc. or any person owning any interest in the site at
which the marina is located,
· Staff has forwarded this application for review by the Board because there had been a .change in
management companies for the 2002 boating season. Karsten Dock Service has submitted to staff a list
of all persons whom slips were leased to for the 2002 season. This list identified nine of the 27 approved
BSU's leased to persons who were owners, tenants or related to such owners of the Chapman Place
Condominium. He believed that all of the requirements of the 2/22/89 Order were being complied with
and staff recommended that the Board approve the 2002 renewal without change application for
Chapman Place Marina, contingent upon continued compliance with the requirements outlined in the
2/22/89 Order.
Foster stated that "commercial marina" facilities must be freely available to the general public and no owner
of specified real property may be given pdodty, preference, or advantage in renting, purchasing or otherwise
securing boat storage rights.
Nybeck stated that Code Section 2.11 defines various categories of dock uses including commercial marina,
transient, and outlot association uses. The Code forbids conversion from any category of use to another
category of use without first coming into compliance with all previsions of LMCD Code. Therefore, it would
not be permissible to convert the operation at the site from commercial marina use to an outlot association
use and maintain the grandfathered legal non-conforming boat storage density. He believed that was one of
the primary reasons why the 2/22/89 Order was established for this site.
Babcock clarified that this site was formerly operated as a commercial marina in conjunction with a
restaurant that was available to the public. The restaurant was sold and the condominium was built in place
of the restaurant. The owner of the restaurant retained the dght to run the marina as a commercial facility
and the marina was eventually put up for sale, with the condominium association buying it. If they had
operated it then as an outlot facility, that would have triggered the conversion of use ordinance. Instead, they
maintained the use as a commercial marina and that was when the Board regulated how the facility was
operated by enacting the conditions in the 2/22/89 Order.
MOTION: BabcOck moved; Wert seconded to approve the renewal without change multiple dock license
application from Chapman Place Marina for the 2002 season.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Additional Business.
Foster stated that he had recently navigated up Six Mile Creek in a 16' fishing boat with Kent Lokkesmoe
from the MN DNR and Jim Blakeway. He reported that they had no problems navigating up Six Mile Creek
and he explained that from the conversation with Lokkesmoe, he understood that the MN DNR prefers
ripadan landowners to build docks' over wetlands to open water instead of dredging wetlands for a marina
area next to land. He further interpreted that the MN DNR prefers property owners to run a dock out to the
edge of cattails and tie boats along the dock instead of dredging a channel through the cattails to the shore.
Knudsen questioned whether this could possibly interfere with navigation through narrow channels and
creeks.
-3075-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002
Page 4
Babcock questioned whether the Board should continue to grant dock length variances over wetlands
because he questioned whether this is sustainable over time. He stated that his goal is to protect wetland
areas more than MN DNR regulations currently do. Lake Minnetonka is getting more pressure to develop
marginal lakeshore because the quality lakeshore has been developed, property values have increased, and
the proximity of Lake Minnetonka to the metro area. He believed that the protection of these marginal
lakeshore areas would have to be a policy issue that the Board would have to make.
The Board had a discussion pertaining to the proposed ordinance amendment pertaining to the use of
motorized watercraft on certain areas of Lake Minnetonka, adding new Section 3.022. The Board discussed
the following:
· Should the Board weigh the amount of boat traffic these tributary wetlands can sustain and what the
cumulative impact of the potential increased use would have on these tributaries. The Board might want
to take these issues into consideration when deciding if there should be restrictions on these tributaries.
This must also be balanced with what the MN DNR considers a fundamental right to access the
waterway.
· Expectations of shoreline use could be communicated to local cities to aid in their land planning
decisions when it comes to marginal lakeshore and creating outlot developments.
· Coordinated efforts with ordinances for land planning and shoreline use between the District and the 14
member cities would be nice but probably not practical. Each city has a different philosophy when it
comes to land planning and it would be difficult to bring them all to a consensus when it comes to land
planning in areas of marginal shoreline. That is why the District should consider developing a lakewide
policy to regulate use of areas of the Lake with marginal shoreline.
Three new concepts for potential ordinance amendments restricting use of these tributaries were
discussed. They included: 1) not allowing motorized watercraft when the Lake level is under a certain
point, 2) not allowing multiple dock facilities in these areas, and 3) increasing the shoreline requirement
for boat storage density in these areas. It may be difficult to enact an ordinance that allows navigation in
a tributary on one day and not on the next day. The Board discussed the concept of tying a restriction of
motorized watercraft in these tributaries to a temporary Iow water declaration by the District.
In wetland and emergent vegetation areas of the Lake, the Board could consider further restricting boat
storage density allowed from the current regulations by applying a more restrictive standard. This could
be done to reduce the impact on these sensitive areas.
Over the past year, the Board has received testimony from environmental professionals and the public
and have somewhat set a mid-June deadline to make a decision on whether to enact an ordinance to
restrict use in the three tributaries. One option for the Board to consider could include extending the
moratorium if they are not prepared to make a decision on the issue at that time.
The consensus of the Board was for Wed to work with staff on the preparation of a list of ideas for possible
ordinance amendments restricting the use of the three tributaries and bring it back for discussion purposes at
the 5/22/02 Regular Board Meeting, in preparation for the 6/12/02 Regular Board Meeting. The list should be
prepared from the most restrictive to the least restrictive options for the Board to consider, noting that it
should include the three existing draft ordinance amendments and new ideas discuss this evening. This list
should include: 1) not allowing motorized watercraft in these areas, 2) only allowing motorized watercraft to
residents, with documented historical use, in these areas, 3) only allowing electric trolling motors in these
areas, 4) only allowing electdc trolling motors for watercraft owned by upstream landowners and stored at
their properties in these areas, 5) restricting motorized watercraft in these areas when the lake is under a
certain level, 6) not allowing multiple docks facilities in these areas, 7) increasing the shoreline requirements
for boat density purposes in these areas, and 8) not restricting use in these areas.
-3076-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002
2. EVVMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE
A.
Page 5
Evaluation of Truck Hauling Bids for the 2002 EWM Harvesting Program, recommendation to award bid.
Nybeck reported that trucking bids were due in the District office by 2 p.m. on 4/25/02, with acceptable and
responsible bids submitted by Craig's Service and Curfman's Trucking and Repair, Inc. The bid received
from Craig's Service was $55 per hour for one truck service and no bid for two-truck service. The bid
received from Curfman's Trucking and Repair Inc. was $50 per hour for one truck service and $98 per hour
for two-truck service. Both bids submitted comply with all bid specifications, other than Craig's Service not
submitting a bid for two-truck service. He recommended the Board award the contract to haul Eurasian
Watermilfoil for the 2002 EWM Harvesting season to Curfman's Trucking and Repair, Inc.
MOTION: Nelson moved, Suerth seconded to award'the 2002 Eurasian Watermilfoil trucking contract to
Curfman's Trucking and Repair, Inc.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Update on "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka" project.
Nybeck provided an overview of the project and made the following comments:
· The zebra mussel stakeholders met three times between 10/30/01 and 1/24/02, noting that the
attendance at these meetings and the enthusiasm for keeping zebra mussels out of Lake Minnetonka
was disappointing. Prior to the last stakeholders meeting, there was a consensus from those
coordinating the stakeholders meetings that the action plan should involve some form of public access
inspections because it would be the most effective and appropriate strategy. The stakeholders that
attended the 1/24/02 meeting were generally unwilling to embrace this element of a zebra mussel
prevention plan, noting that both the District and the LMA suspended continuation of the zebra mussel
stakeholder meetings.
· There is a concern that Lake Minnetonka is at high dsk for a zebra mussel infestation. On March 21 st, he
attended a meeting with Board member Suerth and LMA Executive Director Dick Osgood at the MN
DNR office to discuss the concept of using MN DNR watercraft inspectors at selected public accesses on
Lake Minnetonka for inspection purposes of zebra mussels on watercraft before they enter Lake
Uinnetonka.
LMA and District staff wrote a letter in response to the March 21st meeting with Lee Pfannmuller, Gary
Uontz and Jay Rendall of the MN DNR. The letter was intended to get a response on a proposed pilot
program for 2002 and a long-term program for 2003 and beyond. The pilot program for 2002 consisted of
watercraft inspection at the Sping Park and Maxwell Bay Accesses, with MN DNR watercraft inspectors
present from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., seven days a week, from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day
weekend.
Ms. Lee Pfannmuller from the MN DNR responded to the letter from the LMA and the District stating that
the MN DNR was interested in working cooperatively to prevent the spread of exotic species into waters
of the state, including Lake Minnetonka. She stated that the 2002 pilot project would require an additional
five watercraft inspectors and a crew supervisor, with an approximated total cost of $38,808 to staff the
two accesses from Memorial Day to Labor Day, sunrise to sunset. The MN DNR would hire, train and
supervise the inspectors. The MN DNR would also provide cell phones and uniforms for the inspectors.
He asked for any additional comments from Osgood.
-3077-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002 Page 6
Osgood stated that because of the timeframe, a pilot program for 2002 might be delayed from the Memorial
Day weekend start date. The LMA is currently fundraising for this project and he reported that they did not
currently have half of the estimated pilot project cost of $38,808.
Nybeck stated he had received a phone call from a MN DNR Trails and Waterways official expressing
possible concerns about legal issues involving limiting the dghts of the recreational public to use public
waters of the state.
Osgood stated the pilot program inspectors would use the same procedures as the current MN DNR
watercraft inspectors utilize. These procedures would be applied to boats entering Lake Minnetonka, not
exiting. This would entail voluntary visual inspections and public education. In the case that an inspector
would observe a potential state exotics violation, a MN DNR conservation officer or licensed peace office
would be contacted for enforcement purposes.
Nelson expressed his concem about the issues raised by the MN DNR Trails and Waterways and the legal
issues related to impeding the public's right to use public waters. He believed that there are too many
questions that need to be answered before the District should implement a pilot program.
Suedh stated that the MN DNR has policies and procedures for their current watercraft inspectors. He
believed that these procedures would not change with the pilot program inspectors and that the focus would
change from inspecting watercraft leaving Lake Minnetonka to watercraft entering Lake Minnetonka.
Osgood stated that one of the reasons for the proposed 2002 pilot program is to determine the viability of a
lake wide inspection program in the future.
Suerth stated that he would like to see the Board consider allocating funds from the 2002 "Save the Lake"
Budget for the 2002 pilot project. The Exotics Budget already has $5,000 in funds budgeted for zebra
mussel purposes and he believed that these funds could be allocated for the 2002 pilot project.
The Board discussed the request from Suerth to fund the 2002 pilot project primarily from the 2002 "Save the
Lake" Budget. Some Board members expressed concern with funding projects that are not budgeted in the
2002 "Save the Lake" Budget, These Board members stated that they believe the Board needs to prioritize
projects and plan for them dudng budget preparations. Other Board members suggested scaling back the
pilot program for 2002, with' one possibility including hidng fewer inspectors to inspect watercraft at one
public access for a shorter pedod of time. The Board asked McMillan if there was any possibility to include
funds from the 2002 "Save the Lake" Budget for this pilot project.
McMillan stated that she believed the majority of new project provision funds have been allocated in the 2002
"Save the Lake" Budget. She suggested that she believed there was approximately $3,000 of unallocated
new project provision funds from the 2002 "Save the Lake" Budget that could be earmarked for this project.
MOTION: Weft moved, Suerth seconded to allocate $5,000 from the 2002 Exotics Budget and
$3,000 of new project provision funds from the 2002 "Save the Lake" and a minimum match of
$8,000 from the LMA to implement a pilot program in 2002 at a minimum of one public access,
staffed with MN DNR watercraft inspectors, for a period of time that the funds will allow with results
documented in a final report at the end of the boating season.
Babcock proposed a friendly amendment to not restrict the matching to the LMA. Wert and Suerth agreed to
the friendly amendment recommended by Babcock.
-3078-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002
VOTE: Motion carded unanimously.
C. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
FINANCIAL
A. Audit of vouchers (5/1/02- 5/15/02).
Page 7
Nybeck review the audit of vouchers as submitted. Check #14084, to the City of Mound, was prepared at
their request to refund the their balance of voluntary payments from the 2001 water Patrol project that
increased full-time Deputies by two for five months.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the audit of vouchers for the periods of (511102
- 5/15/02) as submitted.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously,
B. March financial summary and balance sheet.
Nybeck reviewed the March financial summary and balance sheet as submitted.
MOTION: McMillan moved, Burma seconded to accept the March financial summary and balance sheet as
submitted.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Review of timetable to consider draft 2003 LMCD Budget.
Nybeck stated that the timetable to review the draft 2003 LMCD Budget was consistent with past years. He
asked the Board what would,be a good time to set up a meeting for interested Board members to review the
first draft of the 2003 LMCD Budget.
The consensus of the Board was to hold a meeting at 8:00 a.m. meeting on 5/17/02 in the District office.
D. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
4. ADMINISTRATION
There was no discussion
5. LAKE USE & RECREATION
There was no discussion.
6, SAVE THE LAKE
-3079-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
- Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 20l}2 Page 8
McMillan reported that a "Save the Lake" contributor had suggested that the Board consider an ordinance
restricting the color of boat slip canopy covers to green. The consensus of the Board was not to further pursue
into this request.
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Nybeck reported on the following:
The lake level as of 5/6/02 was 929.14~, with a discharge of 12 c.f.s.
o A copy of the monthly Executive Director Newsletter was included in the handout folder. He stated that it
summarized District staff activities in recent weeks.
· A draft resolution commending the efforts of Shorewood Mayor Woody Love on the phosphorous-free
fertilizer legislation effort would be included the 5/26/02 Regular Board Meeting packet for review by the
Board.
8, OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
9. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
I0, ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:24 p.m.
Albert O. Foster, Chairman
Lili McMillan, Secretary
-3080-
DRAFT
LAKE M!NNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BO~D OF:~iEECTI~S: '
7:00 PM. wednesday, May 812002
· Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Foster called the meeting to order at 7:05 p,m.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMillan, Orono; Doug Babcock, Tonka
Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Paul KnUdsen, Minnetrista; Herb S~erth, WOodland; SheldOn Wart, Greenwood. Aisc
present: Charles LeFevere; LMCD Counsel.; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, AdministratNe
Technician.
Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Tom
Skramstad, Shorewood;.Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka Victoria has no appointed Board member.
CHAIR ANNOUNCMENT$, Chair Foster
Foster announced that the Board of Directors Working Session was scheduled for 5:00 p.m. on 5/15/02, with
departure planned from the residence of Paul Knudsen. The Working Session has been coordinated for a visual
inspection tour of two tributaries that lead into Lake M nnetonka, Six Mile and Long Lake.Creeks If Board members
or other intere~;ted parties are unable to attend the Board Working Session on 5115102, they can schedule an
alternative time with Knudsen to visually.inspect Six Mile Creek.
Nybe(~k stated'that heW°aid send outa r~emo with the time and directions to th,e residence of Paul Knudsen for the
5/15/02 Board Working Session to the Board and other interested Parties.
READING OF MINUTES-4/24/02 LMCD Regular B~'ard"Me~{irig: :~'
MOTION! Kn~iSe'n :~°ved, s[jerth 'SeConded t° approve the minutes from the 4/24/02 Regular Boarc~:Meeting
as submitted.
VOTE: Ayes (7), Abstained (1, Babcock); motion carried.
P~BLi~ ~MENTS' persons in'attendar~, sUbj~is nbt On the agePda.
' ~i~~ ~'::,: '~i'~: ~.',: ' ' :' ,~'"? ;. "' :,~" ,;~ :. :
Ther~ ':':' "'~' """~ .... ~: .....
were no co~tS fi~o~'t~:'e'public %' subje6ts not 0n [he agenda. . .
coN~'N~:AG~ND.A- 0:~:h~ agb~'~ i~ems i'de,t~ed with'a (*)Will be 'appfoved~ifi One ~0tion b~l~ss a Board
me:~:~r'f~t~' diScUSS~fi~ 5f a~;~:, ih w-~'~ d~se ~:~.'i[em w be: rembve~?m the cOnsb~t ~:nda
NelSOn m~Ove:d~ Burma· S~d'~:.t6 ~'~'~bve ~'~:~e~[;'agenda as submified, ~bti~P c~d u~'~0uslY. Items
so appr°V~d'idClb~e: 1 C:; ~O~b~:'~'di{i:~i~-~DoCk Li~e~:e~; ~taff reprehends aPp~ova' ~6f ~0~ [~n'e~iWithout change
multiple d~k license' a~ii~atj~::f~'t '~e:a~oWb~6E~dat Ci~db;~Oi~ ot~.~sdnd, ~d'~W~st~:~6:idt~'Pia~.~.NOA, 1D, Ci~
of Minnetonka, staff recommends full refund of $250 dap%it ~or d~ck'ie~:(h'Va:tiah~ apPli~fidfi;.:.~A; LMCIT
Liabi'li~ InSurance; staff r6~hd{~ that ~e Board d~' nb't':WaiV~:{he m~neta~ iim~.~'6~ '-~di:~[Paj~ t~d liability
-3081 -
Lake Mi~net°~a Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002 Page 2
established by Minnesota Statute§ 466.0~4, and 5A, ~002 ~Li%or Li~e%~s, staff recommends approva of renewa
wine and non-intoxicating liquor ticenseapPlicationS fo~ the Chiller boats, Fantas a, Ho day Fa r and Ho iday Fa r I
1. WATER STRUCTURES '
A. Foxhill Association, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of variance application from
LMCD Code for dock length requirements.
Foster requested a correction of the spelling of his name in the draft Findi'ngs of Fact and Order. He asked if
there were comments from the Board on the draft Findings of Fact and Order'.
BabCOck asked hOw the total slip square fOOtage of 5,558 was arrived at.
NYbeck stated the number was frOm the staff memo, which was calcblatedirom the proposed site plan, He
stated the proposed site plan would be a decrease in slip square footage from the 1978 VarianCe Order site
plan that was 5,680.
LeFevere notified the Board that there'was an amended' Findings of Fact and Order in their handout folder.
He stated that the applicant had requested that a sentence in the Order be added stating: "UpQ(I receipt of
payment for three BSU's for the years 1986-2001, the facility shall be back licensed fbr'those years ahd Shall
have non-conforming status as to density at 16 BSU's." He stated that he had. no objection inserting that
sentence into the 'Order.
Foster entertained a motion for approval of the Findings of Fact and Order for Foxhill Association.
MOTION: McMillan moved, Suerth seconded to approve the amendSd Findings of Fact ahd Order, a~
discussed by LeFevere, for approval of the Foxhill Association variance application from LMCD
COde fo'i, dOCk length requiCemehts. " '
VOTE: Ayes (7), Noyes (1, Babcock); motion carried.
Chapman Place Marina, consideration of 2002 renewal, without change, mu tiple dock license app cat on
Foster asked for background on the proposed application from staff.
Harper made the following comments: '
· Chapman Place Madna, has submitted a 2002 renewal without change multiple dock..I ~ep,~e app icat on
for Board consideration. They ~re currently"~°n'siSe'rsd a'ie§a %n<~onfo~i~g ~ui"~Pi~;8881('f~'bilit~ With
27 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on appro.~imately 141' of continuous shoreline, which results in a BSU
density of 1:5'. -~ ~'~ · ',:'~ ': ~"'~ '~"% :~'~:':
· TyBi~a!!y, staff presents renewal without change Bultip e dock I cense app icat OhS tO. the
a~'r~Y~i u~b~e?;'~he coh'sb~t agehda; howe~er, Stsffb~li~Ved the. Board s~ld b.e awareof~e spb~iai
requirements at this facilitY; ' ~'~' .......
· Pd~r to Chapman P ace Marina the fac ty was operated as a comme[¢ a marina in conjunct on with
'~'; s,~iSe~:~e~taar~h:t: .:W th: th6 ~jeof sudsid8 fS~t~'r~nt an8 t~ ~o~st~'~bjion 6f a cOndo~in
q~e'~:(ib~s w~re'~aj'~bS' that i{ mi~t: c°nstj~te a':'~er~i°n ofus~ ~;~id.need .t~ ~Ome into
co~¢:iianb~i~ allP~ovsions~fLMCD COde ;' :~ . ~ ' ':~. ~: ;. '~'~ '~
· 'A ;~b~%~t aP¢;ii'~"0n was ~ad~ ;by Watedo'rd prOpe~ esi~c, in i ~8~;t° ~,tinUe ~eg~andfathered
c°mme¢~ial marCia statu~, The ~°ard ~ppr°Ved th~ request, with a n~mbe~:'°f ~ndi~0n'~ 0~{likbd'in the
-3082-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District '
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 21)02 Page 3
2J22/89 Order. The conditions were made to ensure that no priority of rights to rent slip space shall be
given to members of Chapman Place Association Inc. or any person owning any interest in the site at
which the marina is located.
· Staff has forwarded this application for review by the Board because there had been a change in
management companies for the 2002 boating season. Karsten Dock Service has submitted to staff a list
of all persons whom slips were leased to for the 2002 season, This list identified nine of the 27 approved
BSU's leased to persons who were owners, tenants or related to such owners of the Chapman Place
Condominium. He believed that all of the requirements of the 2/22J89 Order were being complied with
and staff recommended that the Board approve the 2002 renewal without change application for
Chapman Place Marina, contingent upon continued compliance with the requirements outlined in the
2/22/89 Order.
Foster stated that "commercial marina" facilities must be freely available to the general public and no owner
of specified real property may be given priority, preference, or advantage in renting, purchasing or otherwise
securing boat storage rights.
Nybeck stated that Code Section 2.11 defines various categories of dock uses including commercial marina,
transient, and outlot association uses. The Code forbids conversion from any category of use to another
category of use without first coming into compliance with all provisions of LMCD Code. Therefore, it would
not be permissible to convert the operation at the site from commemial madna use to an outlot association
use and maintain the grandfathered legal non-conforming boat storage density. He believed that was one of
the primary reasons why the 2/22/89 Order was established for this site.
Babcock clarified that this site was formerly operated as a commercial madna in conjunction with a
restaurant that was available to the public. The restaurant was sold and the condominium was built in place
of the restaurant. The owner of the restaurant retained the dght to run the marina.as a commercial facility
and the marina was eventually put up for sale, with the condominium association buying it. If they had
operated it then as an outlot facility, that would have triggered the conversion of use ordinance. Instead, they
maintained the use as a commercial marina and that was when the Board regulated how the facility was
operated by enacting the conditions in the 2/22/89 Order.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Wert seconded to approve the renewal without change multiple dock license
application from Chapman Place Marina for the 2002 season.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Additional Business.
Foster stated that he had recently navigated up Six Mite Creek in a 16' fishing boat with Kent Lokkesmoe
from the MN DNR and Jim Blakeway. He reported that they had no problems navigating up Six Mile Creek
and he explained that from the conversation with Lokkesmoe, he understood that the MN DNR prefers
riparian landowners to build docks over wetlands to open water instead of dredging wetlands for a marina
area next to land. He further interpreted that the MN DNR Prefers property owners to run a dock out to the
edge of cattails and tie boats along the dock instead of dredging a channel through the cattails to the shore.
Knudsen questioned whether this could possibly interfere with navigation through narrow channels and
creeks.
-3083-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District "
Regular Board Meeting
May 8,,2002 page 4
Babcock.questioned whether the Board should continue to,grant dock length variances Over wetlands
because he questioned whether this is sustainable over time, He stated that his goal is to protect wetland
areas more than MN DNR regulations currently do. Lake Minnetonka is getting more pressure to develop
marginal lakeshore because the quality lakeshore has been developed, property values have increased, and
the proximity of Lake Minnetonka to the metro area. He believed that~the protect on of these marginal
lakeshore areas would have to be a policy issue that the Board would have to make.
The Boardhad:a discussion pertaining to'the proposed ordinance amendment pertaining to the use of
motoriZed watercraft on certain areas of Lake Minnetonka, adding new Section 3.022..The Board discussed
the following: ..
· Should the Board weigh the amount of boat traffic these tributary wetlands can'suStain and what the
cumulative impact of the potential increased use would have on these tributaries. The Board might want
to take these.issues into consideration when deciding if there should be restrictions:on these tributaries.
This'must also be balanced with what'~the MN DNR considers a fundamental' right to' access the
waterway.
Expectations of shoreline use could be communicated to local cities to aid in their land planning
decisions when it comes' t0'marginal takeshore and creating OUtl0t deVelopments.
· Coordinated efforts With ordinances for land planning and Shoreline use between the. DiStrict and the 14
member cities wodld be nice but probably not PraCtical. Each bity has a different philOSOphy When it
comes to land planning and it"wOuld be difficult to bring them all to'a consen~bs whe~' it comes to land
planning in 'areas of.~arginal Shoreline.'Th~:i~ why th:e DiStriCt' Should conSider develOping a lakewide
policy to regulate use Of areas of. the Lakewith' mar[~ifiai shoreiinel
· Three new concepts for.potential ordinance amendments restricting use of these tributaries were
discussed'. They'ihb'lU~¢d:. '~:) not all0Wing ."Fndtorize8 Watercraft When the Lake ievel is Under a certain
point, ) not a owing multiple dOc'kfa~ht~es ~n these areas, and '3)increasing the shoreline requirement
.bOat st0rag~ i:lefiSitY in ~theS'~;:ateas. it ma~ 'be diffiCUlt to er~act'a~ Oral 'nance'that a:JloWs navigation in
":' ~ tributary on O~e~day and not od.the next day, The BOarddisCusSed. t~:~Concei~ Of tying a restriction of
motoriZbd watercraft in tfie~¢.,tri5'btai, ieS to a tempora~;16w:water deCi~iration..by'the Di~'trict
· In .Wetland a~d e~rger~t'vegetafibn a'i. eas of the Lak~:i¢(h~:;Bbard cou d coh.¢' der rusher'restriCting boat
storage density allowed from the current regulations be ap~iYi~ a more res(fiCtiVe Standard; This could
be done to reduce the impact on these sensitive areas.
· Over the past'year, the Board has received testimony fro~ ~nv mnmehtal professiona § and the public
and have somewhat set ~ mi~'Ja~'etdead'jine t6 ~a~: ~ de~i~ibn'.on Whether t0 e~.§ct an ordinance to
restrict use in the three tributaries. One option for the Board to consider could include extending the
moratorium if they are not prepared to make a decision on the issue a{thai, time:':.~
The consensus of the Board was for Wert to work with staff on the preparation of a ii,St Of ideas for PoSSible
ordinance amendments restricti~] t~? use o~the three tdbutar es and bring it back for discussion purposes at
th~ 5/~0~ l~g'~i~i B~'~d':' ~e{i~,"¥~' pre~a~iati0n ~ :{'~:~?~'~0~"~i:a~ ~O~d ~{jn'~ f~:~': i~t: Should be
prepaCe'd'"ff°~'~(he ~°s{ ~b~tfibt}~b tb~ th~ i:~a~ :~st~c~i~v~ ~?°fi:s~f0'f't~ B°ard {e. c°nsid~, noting' that it
~h~ui~;i'nci~d~e:~e'{~ee:"e~istin~:dfaff.0rdin~a~bea~n~'~g~{~'.a'n-d ne~ id~asd'~Cu~ th S"~veni~g This list
sh0uid ih'CirCe: i h;~es~ ar%A,:2~: o~iy :a~Ji'~i~g ~(6:fized Wa{ercrafl to
resid~fits':, 3):'~n:)'y ~ll'~W'fi'~' ~:l~(hc~:trb: lng m~oto-m ih these
areaS:~ 4)~b~i~ ~ll~Wifi~:~i'ectfi~ tr°llih~ :~6~°~s f°f'water~rafi 5'W~bd'bY :b~st~ea~"i~fld°wne~~'ad~d St°red at
their propeKies in these areas, 5) restricting motorized watemrafl n ~ese areas when the lake is under a
ce~a:ln i~V&l, ~ ~d{',;:ai'ldw~ng-'~uitiPle d~bE~::faciiities i~ fheS~ areas; 7) inc:~e~ing' the shbrei~b ?~qUirements
for boat density purposes in these areas, and 8) not restricting use in these areas. ~ :':'
-3084-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002
2. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
A.
Page 5
Evaluation of Truck Hauling Bids for the 2002 EWM Harvesting Program, recommendation to award bid.
Nybeck repoded that trucking bids were due in the Distdct office by 2 p,m. on 4/25/02, with acceptable and
responsible bids submitted by Craig's Service and Curfman's Trucking and Repair, Inc. The bid received
from Craig's Service was $55 per hour for one truck service and no bid for two-truck service. The bid
received from Curfman's Trucking and Repair Inc. was $50 per hour for one truck service and $98 per hour
for two-truck service. Both bids submitted comply with all bid specifications, other than Craig's Service not
submitting a bid for two-truck service, He recommended the Board award the contract to haul Eurasian
Watermilfoil for the 2002 EWM Harvesting season to Cud=man's Trucking and Repair, Inc.
MOTION: Nelson moved, Suerth seconded to award the 2002 Eurasian Watermilfoil trucking contract to
Curfman's Trucking and Repair, Inc.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Update on "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnet°nka'' project.
Nybeck provided an overview of the project and made the following comments:
The zebra mussel stakeholders met three times between 10/30/01 and 1/24/02, noting that the
attendance at these meetings and the enthusiasm for keeping zebra mussels out of Lake Minnetonka
was disappointing. Prior to the last stakeholders meeting, there was a consensus from those
coordinating the stakeholders meetings that the action plan should involve some form of public access
inspections because it would be the most effective and appropriate strategy. The stakeholders that
attended the 1/24/02 meeting were generally unwilling to embrace this element of a zebra mussel
prevention plan, noting that both the Distdct and the LMA suspended continuation of the zebra mussel
stakeholder meetings.
There is a concern that Lake Minnetonka is at high dsk for a zebra mussel infestation. On March 21st, he
attended a meeting with Board member Suerth and LMA Executive Director Dick Osgood at the MN
DNR office to discuss the concept of using MN DNR watercraft inspectors at selected public accesses on
Lake Minnetonka for inspection purposes of zebra mussels on watercraft before they enter Lake
Minnetonka.
LMA and Distdct staff wrote a letter in response to the March 21st meeting with Lee Pfannmuller, Gary
Montz and Jay Rendall of the MN DNR. The letter was intended to get a response on a proposed pilot
program for 2002 and a long-term program for 2003 and beyond. The pilot prog'ram for 2002 consisted of
watercraft inspection at the SPing Park and Maxwell Bay Accesses, with MN DNR watercraft inspectors
present from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., seven days a week, from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day
weekend.
Ms. Lee Pfannmuller from the MN DNR responded to the letter from the LMA and the District stating that
the MN DNR was interested in working cooperatively to prevent the spread of exotic species into waters
of the state, including Lake Minnetonka. She stated that the 2002 pilot project would require an additional
five watercraft inspectors and a crew supervisor, with an approximated total cost of $38,808 to staff the
two accesses from Memorial Day to Labor Day, sunrise to sunset. The MN DNR would hire, train and
supervise the inspectors. The MN DNR would also provide cell phones and uniforms for the inspectors.
He asked for any additional comments from Osgood.
-3085-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meetin9
May 8, 2002
Page6
Osgood stated that because of the timeframe, a pilot program for 2002.might be delayed from theMemorial
Day weekend start date, The LMA is currently fundra sng for this project and he reported that they did not
currently have half of the estimated pilot project cost df $381808.
Nybeck stated he had received a phone call from a MN DNR Trails and Waterways, offiCia! expressing
possible concerns about legal issues involving limiting the dghts of the recreational public to use public
waters of the state.
Osgood stated the pilot program inspectors would u~e the same procedures as the current MN DNR
watercraft .inspectors utilize. These procedures would be applied to boats entering Lake Minnetonka, not
exiting. This would entail voluntary visual inspections and public education. In the case that an inspector
would observe a potential state exotics violation, a MN DNR conservation officer or licensed peace office
would be contacted for enforcement purposes..
Nelson expressed his concern about the issues raised by the ,MN DNR Trai!s .and Waterways and the legal
issues related to impeding the public's right to use public waters, He believed that there are too many
questions that need to be answered before the District should implement a pilot program.
Suerth stated that the MN DNR has policies and procedures for their,current watemraft inspectors, He
believed that.these procedures would not change with the pilot prog ram,., nspectors and that the focus would
change from inspecting watercraft leaving Lake Minnetonka to watercraft entering Lake ,Minnetonka,
Osgood stated that one of the ~:easons for the proposed 2002 pilot program is to.determine the viability of a
lake wale inspection program in the future.
SueCh stated that he would Ilke to see the Board consider allocating funds from the 2002 "Save the Lake"
Budget for the 2002 pilot project. The EXotics Budget already has $5,00!:)in funds budgeted for zebra
mussel purposes and he beleved that these funds could be a located for the 2002 pilot project
The. Board d scussed the request from Sue[th to fund the 2002 pi ct pro'eci rmad from the 2002 "Save the
, ~... :.: .... .... ..,~:,.~,,,.... ....... ~ .... ~...~ ,J P , Y~: ....
Lake" Budget. S.~)rme Boa[d~embersexPl-essed cdnCdm with fund ng'.Prejects that ate not budgeted n the
': i'' ~ ~": ii ::~ ~;"~'~;i ·'.; ~"'::;~'"~ ';,,',? : .L,;;*, ' i ,-. : :~ '~ '~," ': "' :.! ' , . .
002 Save the Lake Budget. These Board members stated that they believe the Boar~ needs to pnontlze
projects and.plan for. them dur ng.bu~?t ~reparat ohs Other Board members sugge§ibd' sba lng back the
~)il~Jt progt~;'for ~02;'~iit~;one',~)~i~ jji~~ ~ludjd!g'~irin'g' {e~er in~P6~t~i~'to'in~pect ~aterCraft at one
pu~ ic'.;a~f~,s'fOi' a sho¢~:'.*'bri'b~ :~"{ime~ The' i~O~rd asl~ed:McMillan ii ~e~e'wa~ an °sS, bill to ,nc ude
.: ..:. .... ; ., yp ty
fUn~iSfro~, t~e.2002 save th; Lake; BUdget for.th s pi ct project.
, ;;'"' :, ,, ;; f;f- -, , - ~, -. , :¢~,* -, ,(,: -
,McMillan stated that she' believed' the majority Of new' project provision funds have been allocated in the 2002
.a e the Lake Budget.. She suggested that.she believed, there was approximately $3,000 of un~llocated
hew prOject'proviSi~i~'f. Binds fro~i.'[~~ ;2~02,,~;A~*~kb ~u'd~et tibet c~OUid i:)~ e~rma'icked for this project
MOTION: W, .ert moved, Suerth seconded to allocate '$5;0(~b ~rom th~ 2002 E~°(i~S Budget and
$3-,000 of new project provision fdndS fCd~'.il~b.20~)2;:,S~aVeth~'~Eak~'', and a n~inimUm match of
$8,~001 from. the L~A t~'imp.!e~ent, a PiiOi' pr6gram:i'~ 2002 at a minimum (~f one public access,
staffed wi'th MN DNR wate~ra~iin~peSibrsl ¢~i'a pedod of time that the ~dds' will allow with results
documented in a final report at th%nd of the b%ting season. "
Babcock proposed a friendly amendment to not restrict the matching to the LMA. Wed and Suerth agreed to
the friendly amendment recommended by Babcock.
-3086-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, 2002
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Additional Business.
Page7
There was no additional business.
FINANCIAL
A. Audit of vouchers (5/1102 - 5/15/02).
Nybeck review the audit of vouchers as submitted. Check #14084, to the City of Mound, was prepared at
their request to refund the their balance of voluntary payments from the 2001 water Patrol project that
increased full-time Deputies by two for five months.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the audit of vouchers for the periods of (5/1/02
- 5/15/02) as submitted,
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. March financial summary and balance sheet.
Nybeck reviewed the March financial summary and balance sheet as submitted.
MOTION: McMillan moved, Burma seconded to accept the March financial summary and balance sheet as
submitted.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Review of timetable to consider draft 2003 LMCD Budget.
Nybeck stated that the timetable to review the draft 2003 LMCD Budget was consistent with past years. He
asked the Board what would be a good time to set up a meeting for interested Board members to review the
first draft of the 2003 LMCD Budget.
The consensus of the Board was to hold a meeting at 8:00 a.m. meeting on 5/17/02 in the District office.
D, Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
4. ADMINISTRATION
There was no discussion
5. LAKE USE & RECREATION
There was no discussion.
6. SAVE THE LAKE
-3087-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 8, ~.002
Page 8, ~ ~ ..
McMillan reported that a "Save the Lake" contributor had suggested that,the Board consider an grdinance
restricting the color of boat slip canopy covers to green. The consensus of the Board was not to further pursue
into this request,
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Nybeck reported on the following: . ..
· The lake level as of 5/6/02 was 929.14', with a discharge of 12 c.f,s.
· A copy of the monthly Executive Director Newsletter was included in the handout folder. He stated that it
summarized Distriot staff activities in recent weeks.
· Adraft resolution commending the efforts of Shorewood Mayor Woody: Love.on the phosphorous-free
fertilizer legislation effort would be included the 5/26/02 Regular Board Meeting packet for review by the
Board.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
,9. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
10, ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:24 'p.m.
Albert O. Foster, Chairman
Lili McMillan, Secretary
-3088-
DRAFT
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
7:00 PM, Wednesday, May 22, 2002
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Foster called the, meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, SPdng Park; Lili UcMillan,' Orono; Tom Skramstad,
Shorewood; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Crv Burma, Mound; Paul Knudsen, Minnetdsta;
Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Sheldon Wed, Greenwood. Aisc present: Charles
LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative TechniCian.
Members absent: Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Victoria has no appointed Board member.
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster
Foster proposed a neWfOrmat for the annual BOard Lake Inspection Tour. In the past, the Inspection Tour was
conducted on a Saturday'morning in june; 'hOWever, staff has informed him that the workload for the Board in' July
appeared to be relatively light. He suggested that the Board might want to consider cancelling either the July 10"~ or
24th Regb"lar BOard meeting and conducting the annUal Lake InspectiOn Tou~' on that evening. He recommended that
the Board take up this discussion later in the meeting under "New Business".
READING OF MINUTES. 5/8/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting'~:'~
N'YbeCk ~tated that thesls/02 Regular Board Meet ng m nutbs had jbstbeenfinalized and had not been forwarded to
the I~oa~li fOr review.~ ~He recom:m~'hded'th~t {hey"Be ~'emoved for Board ~consideration at this'meeting and' n~'bved
back to the 6/12/02 RegUlar Board 'Meeting:
Foster stated that the 5/8i02 Regular' I~O~rd. Meeting minutes Woaid be in the packet for the 6/12/02 Regular Board
Meeting.
· PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects: not On the agenda.
There were no comments fr~m the'pUblic 0ri"siJ~bje(~ts not on the agbndai'
CONSENT AGENDA. cbnsetit a§end,a items wit~ a (,) will be aPpi~oved in one motion unlesS a Board member:
requests diSCUSsion of: any itemi' i?i which~ca~e the item wiJ'ibe r~mOved :'fi~0~' the consent agenda:"
Wert moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carded unanimously. Items
so approved include: lB, Hennepin County Shedffs Office Water Patrol Significant Activity Report; 2A, 2002 Multiple
Dock Lice, se, staff recommends ~ppro~l of 2002 ~enewaj without cha~h~'~pPiicati0h for Rid~b~ COve property
Owners Association; 3Bi Apfii financiai~ summary and 6'aiance sheet; an~ 4A, MinuteSfrom the 5/~i:0/02 EWM)EX~)tics
Task Force Meeting.
-3O89-
Lake M!nnet°nka Conservation District
RegUia~'~Board Meeting
May 21~, 201)2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Page 2
Bayview Charter Cruises, new on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor and wine license applications for the charter
boat, Endeavor.
Foster opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. He asked if there were any comments from the applicant or public
on the proposed applications. There being no comments, Foster closed the public headng at 7:05 p,m,
Babcock asked if the City of Spdng Park had approved Lord Fletchers as a port of call.
Harper stated that it had been approved.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Seuntjens seconded to approve the new on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor and
wine license applications for the charter boat, Endeavor, for the 2002 season,
VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously.
City of Deephaven, new multiple dock license, special density license, and variance applications, to: 1) add 5
additional temporary Boat Storage Units (BSU's) for the 2002 season, and 2) vadance from LMCD Code for dock
'length requirements.
Foster opened the public hearing at 7:06. He stated that he believed the staff memo was self-explanatory and he
asked if there were commentS from the applicant Or the public on the proposed applications.
Mr. Dana Young, Deephaven City Admin stratOr, stated that he was in attendance and. that ..he would respond to
any questions or comments.
There being no further comments, Foster closed the pUblic hearing at.7:07 p.m.
Foster stated that the proposed applications have been .submitted for one season because .,the residents on the
south end Carso~s BaY are unabie to aCceSs LakeM nnet°'nkabecauSe of iiie bridge conStruct on. The City'°f
Deephaven has located tie-on sliPs for one-year until construction of the bridge is complete.
Young stated that. construct on of the bridge should be completed somet me around October.
LeFevere stated that it would be beneficial to cladfy the length of the proposed temporary dock length variance
application for the preparation of Find ngs .o[ Fact and Order. ~ .,
Babcock stated that the temporary dock::length vadance would beapprox mate y 150L ·
MOTION: McMi!lan m~ved, Skramstad seconded tQ approve th~ City of Deephavennew multiple dock license
apPliCation for the 2002 Season and to d'rect attorneY to prepare Fihdings of Fact and Order for
approval of the variance and special density license applications to add five additional temporary
BSU's, '
Babcock proposed 'a. friendlY amendment to restrict the::additionai temPOrary .BSO's for the 2002 season and
subject to no objections raised by theMN DNR. McMillan and Skramstad ~greed tothis.
Seuntjens asked for clarification on when Findings of Fact and Order are prepared.
-3090-
Lake Minnetonka ConservationDistrict
Regular Board Meeting
May 26, 2002
Page 3
Foster stated that Findings of Fact and ~rder are prepared for vadance and special density license applications.
McMillan asked if the Board wanted to address the request from the applicant to waive the fees submitted for the
proposed applications. ~ ~ ~... -~ .
The consensus of the Board was for staff to bdng back a memo at a future meeting summarizing fees received
and costs incurred in the processing and administration of the proposed applications.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Wayzata, Bay Management, new multiple dock license and, special density license applications for 83 Boat
Storage Units (BSU's) on 1,134' of continu°s shoreline.
Foster.opened the public, hearing at.7:13 p.m.' He asked the applicant or. the public if they had comments or
questions. There being no comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m.
Foster stated that he believed that the proposed applications were relatively straightforward, even if the shoreline
was adjusted because of the Code provision that allows the Board to adjust the length of the shoreline at a site if
:,the measured shoreline exceeds 125% of the straight line measurement. The applicant has proposed the
addition of three additional watercraft and the Board should .focus on whether it is comfortable with the propOsed
public amenities.
Babcock sta!ed, thaUhis site was oneof the vadous sites ·around.the Lake that precipitated the Code amendment
thatwoutd allow.,theBoard to consider adjusting measured shoreline to usable shoreline. He stated that,aidock
length variance was granted for this site originally and he expressed concem with increasing density at the site,
'although the proposed changes are within the 100' contour.
LeFevere stated 1hat. the ,apprgved,vari.ance that.Babc0ck was referring to was approVed:in ~l,979..and allowed
dock construction .out:to: the 200' contour*tir~e from the 929,4 NGVD shoreline' due:to water depths~in para,of,the
dock use area:being too deep, .
Harper stated that the applicant originally wanted to relocate two BSU's from inside the breakwall and to update
the approved public amenities, ~.,-.~ . . .. .... ·
Mr. TOdd Nelson, representing the applicant, stated that the five tie-on BSU's within the breakwall have become
problematic* in recent,yearn. ,an~ that ~theywou dike tQ,relocate a;.couple ofthem: He pointed out that theyhave
been unable to store ..five water, cmff along '~he breakwall becauseeftheselfqimitations on size:
,Babcock stated :that,he bel eve.d part, of the prob,em assoc ated w th this site:is that the Code used to ,allow,,
double counting, of shgrel ne for the breakwa .,~f the,breakwal '~id not exist at this site~'.he estimated that -'
sho~ ine'.would be.,.,red, uced.:.to~ppproxi.,~ate!y 765',~ He ,stated that the Boardcoutd adjust this' shoreline ~if either
half or all of the breakwall was included in determining shoreline measurements at this site. Hebelieved.~that the'
Board made concessi(~ns to allow docking of large watercraft outside of the 100' contour and he questioned
~hether expans on of three BSU% is medted~., .;:: ,., . :~
-3091 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
May 26, 2OO2
Page4
Nelson stated that slips 47 - 57 were reduced in recent years to 40' long. He added that he would like to increase
[he number of BSU's approved at the site by three; however, he would be agreeable to not increasing the number
of approved BSU's as long as couple of the BSU's along the breakwall could be relocated.
Ambrose pointed out that the observation deck as a public amenity should probably be deleted because it will not
exist at the facility in the future, A condition of the City of Wayzata approval for the proposed restaurant was
transient slips and he asked for clarification on the location of transient slipS on the proposed site plan,
Nelson stated that the transient slips have not been established on the proposed site plan.
Babcock stated that the Code currently does not require the applicant to identify the location of these type of
transient slips. It is up to the licensee to establish the location of the transient slips, proyided the number of boats
being stored at the site does not exceed the number of approved BSU's.
Foster stated that he was concerned with the applicant possibly stodng more boats' at the site than approved
because all of the BSU's could be rented as ovemight storage and there is a need to fulfill the City of Wayzata
requirement of transient BSU's.
Seuntjens stated that if the City of Wayzata required transient slips at this site beCause-of the, proposed
restaurant and city Staff did not comment on this through, the request of comments through MNDNR General
Permit 97-6098, the Board might want to consider getting this clarified from city staff. :
Babcock stated that if both the District and the City of Wayzata pass restrictions on this site,.the applicant needs
to comply with the most restrictive requirements. If the City of WaYzata would like a designate~ number Of
transient BSU's at this site, the City of WaYzata rather than the District wOUld need to ensure~th~t'the applicant
complies with this requirement. ~ .... .~.
Seuntjens stated that staff memos in the past have generally stated that Board approvals should be contingent
upon no negative feedback.from the member city in whichtherproject is proposed ortho MN DNR. If,Other
"gOvemmental agencies have momreStriCtive rUleS than the DistriCt,and the intent of: the: BOard is not to honor
them before the Board approves a proposed application, this language should be amended in future staff
memos,
McMillan stated that she believed it might be appropriate to check with Wayzata staff On transient slip
requirements at this facility because of the, proposed restaurant.
Babcock;Stated that he was suppodive of transient slips on Lake :Uinnetonka;, howeVeri:~here are no. code
provisions thatrequire the applicanHo designate transient slips at.these ~pe:of facilities,
WeFt stated that he would be agreeable to a motion to :alloW theapPlicant to relOcate two'of the BSU's from the
breakwall and to increase BSU's from 80 to 81.';by considering BSU '39A alOng the main; boardwalk forthe Storage
of a personal watercraft.-He believed that.the decisions on the designation ofttansieh't BSU'S at thiS facility'
should ~,nOt be .made by the District. -
MOTION: WeFt moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the new multiple doCk and special density license
applications for 81 BSU's for the 2002 season.
-3092-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation 'District r ~ ' '
RegUlar Board Meeting
May ~26, 2002 page 5
AmbrOse stated that he believed the transient slip issues could be resolved between the applicant and the City of
Wayzata.
Babcock stated that he cOuld not supPort the proPosed increase in density of BSU's from 80 to 81, although he
suppoded the relocation ofthe two BSU's from along the breakwall because the proposed sites would be
contained within the 100' contour.
Nybeck reviewed the PropOSed public amenities, noting that the BOard might want to require a minimum of 25 per
season for fishing trip excursions and the elimination of C4 based on the feedback from Ambrose on the
observation deck. This would result in 49 public amenity points, well above the 30 points required for this site by
Code. He noted that the applicant has agreed to these Changes.
Foster recommended a friendly amendment to motion to include the comments from Nybeck and the comments
from staff in the memo on the updates to the proposed public amenities. Wert and Knudsen agreed to this.
Nelson updated the Board that other public amenities, such as public boardwalk, are already being provided by
the apPiicant.
Babcock recOmmended a friendly amendment to eliminate BSU 39A along the main boardwalk and to refund the
$330 fee submitted with the special densitY liCense application, wed and Knudsen agreed to this.
Nelson stated that he was agreeable to withdraw the special density license application.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Howards Point Marina, new multiple dock license and special density license applications for 15 Boat Storage
Units (BSU's)on 153' of continuous shoreline.
Foster opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m.
Nybeck made the following comments:
·
He asked for an update on this agenda item from staff.
Mr. David Albrecht, representing the applicant, submitted new multiple dock and special density license
applications in late Apdl for 15 BSU'S ~n 153'of continuous shoreline. Skramstad had advised the Board
in past Board meetings that this request would be forthcoming and that the City of Shorewood .would be
reviewing a request from the applicant to rezone the proposed §ire frOm residential to c~)nimerCiai. This
request was reviewed at the 5/7/02 Shorew0od Planning Commission Meeting and that a
reCOmmendatiOn to denY'the request wOUld :be fOrwbrd~d tOthe ~h0l'~Wood '~ity chunc
· A subsequent phon~ call:was received from Mr. Albrecht i'equ~sting the DistdCt to Withdraw the new
multiple dock and special density':liCen~b~'-appliCationSl' He alS(~Tb~bbSted"'that the~;~iStddt~consider
refunding any portion';:0f the fees sabmitted'with these appl'iCa{i°n~'i staff reCOmmended that the applicant
make this request formally in wdting.
· Mr. Albrecht submitted a letter, dated 5/11/02 withdrawing its'special density license applications and
requesting refund of any portion°f the aPPlicatiOn fees :Submitted.'~'The' letterdid not r~etence
withdrawing the new multiple dock license application; however, a'letter had sinCe been received
requesting this'.
· Fees received bythe District includb$~:55:00 for the'new multlPle doCk license application and $450 for
the special density license application. Neither applicatiOn has languagb that states whether or not the
-3093-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation'District ~
Re~lular Board Meeting
May 26, 2002
Page6
application fees subm tted are;.!;efundab e He estimated that fees incurred by the District on these
applications were between $100 and $150. He entertained comments or feedback from the Board.
Foster asked~the public if there were any comments on the proposed applications that were withdrawn at the
request of the applicant, There,being no comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 8:01 p, m.
Babcock stated it had come to his attention, and confirmed by staff, that unauthorized dry launching was taking
place at this facility. He noted that he wanted the Board to understand this and that he would like steps to be
taken to correct it.
Nybeck stated that he had discussed this'~with the applicant and they were told that it needed to cease
immediately. This will be followed up in wdting and checked into fUrther during annual inspections of the multiple
dock facilities.
McMillan s(ated that she would like staff to formalize analysis of staff expenses in wdting for these applications.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Suerth seconded to refund $1,055 of the fees submitted by Howards Point Marina
for the new multiple dock and special density license applications withdrawn.
Babcock recommended a friendly amendment to add language to these applications that states application fees
submitted are non-refundable. Skramstad and Suerth did not agree to this.
Foster stated that he would prefer not to see this language.
Knudsen stated that he would prefer to leave this language off the applications and deal with refund requests on
a case by case basis.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously,
LAKE usE& RECREATION
A. Discussion of Wetland Protection Ordinance Amendment.
Foster asked Weft to provide an overview of this agenda item
Wert made the following comments:
· LeFeV.e, re had prepared a sheet that summarized,identified boat restdctionoptions from the most
rest~'i'~ti~e tO thor i'~astlrestr~CiiVe,f0r wetland' PrJ:)t~ction ordinanCes. This sheet was .further simpl fled
to fi~ °ptj(~nS~io~'~i~St r~Stdct~v:~ t0 ieast:'r~eSirictive f(~r Board d scUss on PUrposes..
· He'~{~{~d th'~i~:j~'e:~iU;l~!hbi.b~'~abie to'attend,.~e.fi~.st B0ard. m~eti.~g sChed'ule~I .in jUne and that he
wo'~ld !ikb'to move fU'r{~ei diScuss on ofihevadoUs we{lands prote(~ti0n0rdinance options to the
se~bn'~0ard' meeting. '.
· The moratorium is scheduled to terminate the day after the first meeting in June and the Board might
want t°"~onsider cogtinu '~g jtfo~ an 'indefinite per. od of {ime
· He provided further detail ot; thesimp ified sheet that summarized five options for :Board consideration
fOr ~tl'and Pr°tecti0n'0rdinanc~s'i: The first ~)~Ption, Which Would be the most...restrictive;, would involve
no motorized watercraft in the. tributary areas dentified The second option would include no
m°to~iZ~d traffi(~:and grandfathering thethree parties inSix Mile Creek. ~he third option Would allow
el~Ctr°nic trolling ~i~ ti'~c only, exCept grandfathering the three parties in SiX Mile Creek. The
-3094-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 26, 2002
Page 7
fourth option would allow only electronic trolling motor traffic~ with possible restrictions on boat length
and motor, horsepower. The ·fifth option,· which would be the least restrictive, Would inclUde no
environmental controls.
All five options could include no motorized traffic restrictions when the lake level reaches below Iow-
water conditions, 928.0. The channels for the three tributaries discussed by the Board could also be
buoyed.slow, no,wake and signed explaining the restrictionsin that tributa~.
He.re~ewed the' Board Working Session of the inspections conducted of Six Mile.and Long Lake
Creeks on 5/15/02.
He concluded that he believed no Board action on these options should be resolved at this meeting;
however, he 'envisioned Board discussion of them.
The Board discussed the five options summarized by Wed. The Board discussed the idea of grandfathedng
affected properties that have docks on Long ,Lake Creek, possibly through the second and third 'options.
· There was concem raised by. some Board members that the fourth option might be more restrictive than the
third option because of the boat length and motor horsepower restrictions~ The concept of adding these
restrictions to the third option was discussed.
Mn Jerry LeMire, 4205 Forest Lake Drive, stated that he had a property that abutted Six Mile Creek and that
he would like to have his property grandfathered.
McM.i, ilan stated that she wou d prefer that the Board consider grandfathedng a 'pamel of property. Babcock
stated that he would prefer grandfathering a specific boat with a specific license. Knudsen statedthat he
recalled the three affected properties considered for gamdfathedng in Six Mile Creek have illustrated recent
historical use..,Foster stated that,.he opposed any form of grandfathefing and that he believed most of the
environmental concerns could be addressed through the foudh option.
Mr. Mike Ott, 680 Brown Road, stated that he resided on Long Lake Creek. He recommended that his
property be grandfathered for motorized watemraft on Long Lake Creek and stated that he had concern
about the possibility of being restricted to .electronic trolling motors,
Knudsen and Babcock.:discussed whether itwas practical .rtoassume that residents in these tributaries would
traverse them with an electronic trolling motor if the Board adopted such a restriction.. Babcock stated that
he believed there are plenty of areas around Lake Minnetonka to store larger watercraft and the wetland
areas imthesetributaries are not appropriate · ~
~i~ ' "~
Mr. Tim Hassett, representing Upland Farms, suggested that ~e-Board should define what cdteda would be
used if grandfathering in these tributary areas were adopted. He reminded that it was the recommendation
of his. client te limit ~motorized traffic in Six Mile Creek to electronic trolling motors with the possibilitY of
restricting boat:~lengths~and, motor~horsepower. ......... - .....
McMillan stated that she believed the pdmary issue for the Board was to balance the environmental issues in
these areas w th ~¢senable a~cess..to Lake Minneto.n, ka, She,rev ewed'the differences between Long Lake
and Six Mi e~,,O{ee, l(~,:noting ,that.th,e..~x st n.g,,~, rgad trestle leading into Long .Lake Creek is a physical
impediment. She noted that it takes approxmate y~30 minutes to traverse from the UPland Farms
development to Lake Minnetonka during good w~te[.conditions. She stated that she would like the input of
the member cities on what they believe i's reasonable. '
-3095-
Lake IVlinnetonka Conservation District
'Regular Board Meeting
May 26; 2002 Page 8"
Mr. Bruce Magnusson, a resident of Upland Farms, stated that the proposed marina at the development was
one. of the appealing Points in this development. He ~uPported acceSS to Lake Uinnetonka with establishing
a slow-wake zone.
Seuntjens stated that he generally supported establishing electronic trolling motor restrictions rather than
utilizing grandfathering, with limitations on thrustSf the trolling motor and the size of:the boat. He believed
that this would discourage use but allow the residents that abut these tributaries reasonable access and it
would prohibit other boaters from traversing these areas.
Skramstad stated that he would be supportive of grandfatheringexisting sites and further restricting these
areas to electronic trolling motor traffic.
Nelson stated that if environment concern is the primary issue for the Board, he could support the first option.
He recognized that there would be residents who would be impacted by this option; however, he expressed
concern about the Distdct grandfathering affected properties. Taking this into consideration, he stated that
he also could support the fourth option.
Mr. Greg Smith, 4345 Enchanted Drive, stated that he had a 24' long boat and he expressed concern about
traversing Six Creek to Lake Minnetonka with an electronic trolling motor. He suggested that the Board
might want to consider restricting motorized watercraft in Six Mile Creek to the west of properties that have
historical use. This would eliminate the need for grandfathedng because Upland Farms has agreed to the
use of electronic trolling motors.
The Board discussed what date to further discuss this agenda item, June 12~ or June 26th.
MOTION: Nelson moved, Babcock seconded to have further discussion of this agenda item at the June 26,
2002 Regular Board Meeting.
VOTE: Ayes (10), Nayes (1, Seuntjens); motion carried.
Seuntjens stated .that he opposed the motion because he might not be able to attend the June 26, 2002
Board Meeting.
The Board discussed whether there is a need to extend the'existing moratorium:that is' set to e~pire on June
13, 2002. The consensus of the Board was for LeFevere to bring a draft Code amendment for review at the
June t 2, 2002 Regular Board Meeting.
Wert. recommended that the Board conduct a straw poll vote to getan idea where Board members Stand on
the various options, noting that eight affirmative votes-Would~.be~ needed t~"ado~'t a~¢~ ordinance:The
Board concurred with the recommendation and conducted an informal straw poll of the various options, with
a summary below:
· There werethme affirmative votes onlhe possibilitY of adopting the flrst~0Ption.
· ~ There were.five affirmative votes on the possibility bf adopting the sec0nd ~[ion,
· There were seven affi~ative votes for thet~ird 5ptionl
· There were nine affi~ative voteS for the;fOurth option.
The meeting was recessed at 9:11 p.m. and re-convened at 9:25 p.m. Nelson left at 9:11 p.m.
-3096-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May26, 2002
B. Additional Business.
There was no additional-business.
Page9
2. WATER STRUCTURES
B. AdditionalBusiness.
There was no additional business.
FINANCIAL
A. Audit of vouchers (5/16/02 - 5/31/02).
Skramstad reviewed the audit of. vouchers as submitted.
' MOTION': Skramstad moved;. BabCOck seconded to apprOve the audit of vouchers for the period of 5/16/02 -
5131/02 as submitted.
VOTE: Motion carded unanimously.
C. Review of draft 2003 LMCD Budget.
Nybeck stated that the draft 2003 LMCDB'udget was recently prepared with the assistance~ Of'FOSter,
Nelson, Skramstad, and Nelson. He prOvided an overview of the draft 2003 LMCD Budget, highlighting the
key elements of it. A meeting will be scheduled for Wednesday, 6/5/02, to gather comments and feedback
on it from the 14'.member cities and iritereSted 'B0ard::~embem. He encouraged comments oi' feedback from
the Board Priori't0submitting it to the member ~itie~fot"their re~/iew.
The Board reviewed the draft 2003 LMCD Budget, with a summary as f0110Ws:
· The ~.e, serve levels for the Administrativ? and Exotics Budget are below agreed upon levels and the
2003 ·Budget does. not inblude 'funds'to ~tibrease the reseW~levels at this point!
· Th~ Board diSdU~sed' 200i total taxa§l~ market vaiaes and net'tax capacities and how they are
utilized ih the LMOD.B'udget pCb~ess.~
· Line item 4c) that budgeted $2,500 of funds for the solar light pilot Project Was discussed. The
consensus of the Board was to remove the $2,500 budgeted for the solar light pilot project and fund
that from "Save the Lake" funds. ':~' ...... '"
· Line item 2a) for office lease and storage was discussed, noting that the m~ney received in. 1997 for
rent offset would be depleted after the third quarter in 2003.
· Line item 6b) for the Water Patrol project was discussed, with the question raised whether funding
should be included in the Administrative Budget and what steps were being taken t0'~ke this''p'~ject
sustainable on a long-term basis.
· A line item of $3,500 should be added to the Administrative Budget for exPenditUres for e~ahncing
the Administrative Reserve Fund.
The consensus of the board was to eliminate the $2,500 budgeted for Solar-L~!ghts and fund this project with
"Save the Lake" funds, to include a line-item of $3,500 for transfer to the Ad~ihistrative R~serve FUnd~,':t0 ia~(e
funding possibly needed for the "Let's Keel~"~: MaSS,i{ OUi'of Lake Minnet°nka" Pr0j'~t froh the Ex~tics
Reserves, and to forward it to the 14 member cities for their review.
-3097-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation bistrict
Regular Board Meeting
May 26, 2002
Page 10
4. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
B. Additional Business.
Suer'th updated the Board on the "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka" project, noting that he
believed the fund drive of the LMA is going relatively slowly.
ADMINISTRATION
A. Review of draft LMCD Resolution 102.
Foster asked for comments on the draft LMCD Resolution 102 or a motion to approve it.
Ambrose recommended that the second to the last paragraph be amended to read" NOW, THEREFORE, BE
IT RESOLVED by the LMCD Board of Directors that it unanimously supports and appreciates the
outstanding leadership and direction of Mayor Wood Love for his involvement in the adoption of state
legislation that restricts the use of lawn fertilizers containing phosphorous".
MOTION: Ambrose moved, Babcock seconded to approve LMCD Resolution 102 as amended, with the
language recommended by Ambrose.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Consideration of staff recommendation for compensation adjustment for Administrative Technician, Judd
Harper.
The Board discussed the performance of Judd Harper, Administrative Technician and EWM Project Manager
for the District, and the recommendation of Nybeck to adjust his annual salary from $35,000 to $37,000,
retroactive to 5/1/02. If approved, $34,500 of the annual salary would be taken from the Administrative
Budget and $2,500 from the Exotics Budget.
MOTION: Babcock moved, McMilan seconded to adjust the annual salary of Judd Harper, Administrative
Technician and EWM Project Manager for the District, from $35,000 to $37,000 retroactive to
5/1/02, with $34,500 to be taken from the Administrative Budget and $2,500 to be taken from the
Exotics Budget.
C. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
6. SAVE THE LAKE
There was no discussion.
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Nybeck reported on the following:
· The lake level as of 5120/02 was 929.52', with a discharge of 75 c.f.s.
-3098-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 26, 2002
page 1t
A cOpy of the "SOlar-Light" press ReleaSe that was fo~arded to the member cities and the local
he. papers Was included in the BOard Packet.
Three local newspaper articles from the May 21st edition of theLakeShore Weekly news were included in
the Board packet. These articles include a summary of the 5/8/02 Board Ueeting~,a response to the
"Solar-Light" Press Release, and a summary of the phosphorous-free fertilizer state legislation.
8. OLD. BUSINESS
WayZata Yacht Club Update
Ambrose stated that he would like to update the Board on the status of the Wayzata Yacht Club (WYC), Site 2,
jib crane. He made the following comments:
· The District reviewed the request for the jib crane this past winter and ultimately approved it. He reviewed
the minutes from a Board meeting in January, noting that the WYC representative, Tom E!sen, indicated
to the Board: that they Would resOlve the Pending issues with the City of wayzata, primarily' He conditional
use permit' (CUP) for the proPOsed jib Cr~h:~. At th:is meet ng he reCOmmended that ihe ~C coniact c ty
staff to file proper application for consideration' from: the City of Wayzata.
· There have been numerous occasions where the WYC has reviewed city files; however, he was unaware
of the WYC having any substantive conversations with Wayzata staff regarding submittal of. proper
applications. He added that he was unaware of any planned agenda items at upcoming. Planning
Commission or City Council meetings.
· The permit approved by the District for the proposed jib crane and other changes approved had a number
of conditions tied to it, including the need for the WYC to obtain all requisite permits, licenses, and
approvals from the City of Wayzata, MN DNR, and other governmental agencies. The City of Wayzata
received a letter from WYC, dated 5/10/02, indicating that they intended to proceed with the ordering and
installation of the jib crane on the dock as approved by the District based on the belief that WYC complied
with all applicable regulations in this matter.
· The legal repreSentative for the City of Wayzata has notified WYC in a letter, dated 5/16/02, that the WYC
cannot install a jib crane until applications have been made and a CUP has been secured ,for~the
installation of a jib crane, consistent with the recommendation of city staff. The WaYzata City Council has
authorized the city attorney to take whatever declaratory or injunctive actions may be required to address
this situation.
· He stated that he was offended with the approach being taken by the WYC because he believed they
would comply with the permitting process of the City of Wayzata. He concluded that he believed that the
Board might want to re-evaluate the approvals previously approved for installation of the jib crane.
The Board discussed that District ordinances currently require the WYC to secure all requisite permits and
conditions of the City of Wayzata, noting that this was stated in the conditions of the Board approval. If there is a
disagreement between the WYC and the City of Wayzata on what municipal permits and conditions are required,
the consensus of the Board was that it was outside the purview of the District.
LeFevere stated that the District could require the WYC facility to be in compliance with all District ordinances,
including complying other governmental agencies that have jurisdiction for the proposed jib crane. Two options
for the Board to consider include revoking or denying the permit for the WYC. A problem associated with these
options is that the District would in effect be enforcing the ordinances for the City of Wayzata. He reminded the
Board that WYC needs to comply with the most restrictive requirements of the governmental agencies.
Ambrose stated that he would keep the Board abreast of the situation.
-3099-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
May 26, 2002 ~ Page 1.2
The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to write a letter to the WYC reminding them of the conditions of
the District approval, including the need to secure proper approvals from the City of Wayzata, and that the District
license is not valid until the conditions have been met.
Water patrol Proiect UPdate
Skramstad stated that progress was being made regarding funding options for continuation of the Water Patrol
project beyond 2002. He noted that he had attended a few meetings regarding this, with Hennepin County
Commissioner Mary Tambomino at one of them. She was supportive of the continuation of the program and he
stated that she would be checking into continued funding of the program by Henne.pin County. He concluded
that he would keep the Board up to date on this project.
9. NEW BUSINESS
The Board discussed the idea of cancelling either the 7/10/02 or 7~24~02 Regular Board Meeting and
coordinating the annual Board Lake Inspection TOur for that evening. The consensus of the Board was to cancel
the 7/10/02 Regular Board Meeting and cOOrdinate the annual Board Lake Inspection for that evening, with
further details on the time and itinerary to be worked out in the future
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10!34 p.m.
Albert O. FOster, Chairman
Lili McMillan, Secretary
-3100-
-3102-
O o CD O
O O CD O
I~J -~ .~ CO ~ O0 O~ O~
CO CO O O O CD CD CD
O O O I~o CD O CD O O CD O O
O O , CD O ~ CD CD , ~ C) , , O CD CD CD CD O
-3103-
· 0
~ o
oo O~ oo ~W CD
0 CD CD o0 CD
CD o cD o o o
oo oo
cD CD
o 0 oo
0 · 0 0 0
O~ .~ 0 0 0 CD
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 · 0 CD 0 ~
~. O0 0 0
CO 0 0
0 C) 0
CD CO CZ) CZ)
0 0 0 0 0
· 0
Z
0
Z
-3104-
Z~
-3105-
Z~
~ o o o o o o o o ~ co o o o o o o o o o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD O0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 CD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-~ O~ '~ '~ O~ CO "~ -~ 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-3106-
Z U~
o o~.~~,~ o o o o ~ o o o '~ o o
~ ~ o o co o c~ o ~ o o o o o o o
0 0 0 0 C~ 0 0 0 O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O0 0 0 O0 0 0'~ 0 "4 0 0 0 ~D 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (]~ 0 0 0 0 0
0 .~ "W 0
O0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
C;1 0 '~ 0 0 0 0 0
~ 0 0 O~ 0 0 0 0 0
Z
Z
°
Z
Z
0 0 0 0 -'~ 0 0 0 .~ 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (~
0
o ~ o '~ '~ ~ '~ -~ -~ co c~ o c~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 O~ 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 ~ O0 0 0 0 0 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0
-3107-
~ 0 0 0 .~ 0 0 0
0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 "-,I 0 0 0 -~ 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0
I~0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0
0 ~ 0 0 .~ 0 0 0 0 C.O 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
z
z
0
0 0 0 0 -a. 0 0 0 0 O~ 0 0 0
0 0 CD 0 O0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0
O~ CD 0 .-~ 0 0 0
0 , 0 0 O1 0 0
o ~ ~ ~ o
0 0 CD C~
-3108-
Z ~
co o .~. I,~ m o o ~ o o o co a0 ~ 1,0 o .~ o o
O~ O ~ O CD CD CD '"q O O O ~ 4:~ ~ ~ O 4~ O O
~ o° o o ~ o o o a~ .~ --~ c::; c~ c::; o
Z
Z
Z
-3109-
O~ o
o ~
o o o o o o : o o o ~ o o o oo o~> ~ ~
o ooo
O O O O~ O O O ¢J~ 4~ O ~ CD O PO ~ O
z
z
0
I~ CD CD I~
0 0 0 O0
O O O~ ~O -~ ~
O O O O0 O O O 1~O O~ O
O O~ O O O (D O O
¢J~ ¢.O O '~l ~O O
¢.O ~O O ~0 4~ O
GO O O O0 r~ O
IX
~0 O O 4~ --~ O
~O O O 4~ .A O
z
z
~>
0
z
-3110-
-3111 -
Mound City
155.25
Ordln~llCes~ Resolutions, ~ Motions~ Petitions and Comm!mlcatiox~.
Subd. 1. Readln~s. Every ordinance and resolution shall be presented in writing.
An or&nanc~e or re~olution need not be read in full unless a member of Se Council
reque~ such a reading.
Subd. 2. Si~ and Publication Proof..Every ordinance and resolution passed by
the Cotmcil shall be signed by the Mayor, attested by the Clerk, and filed by him. or her in
the ordinance or resolution book. Proof of publication of every ordinance shall be attached
and filed with the ordinance.
Subd. 3. Repeals and Amendments. Every ordinance or resolution repealing a
previous ordinance or resolution or a section or subdivision thereof shall give the number,
if any-, and the title of the ordinance or code number of the ordinance or resolution to be
repealed in whole or in part. Each 0rdinanee or resolution or part thereof shall set forth in
full each amended section or subdivision as it will read with the amendment.
Sub& 4. Motions, Petitions~ Commnnleatiol~.. Every motion shall be sm_ted in full
before it is submkted to a vote by the presiding officer and shall be recorded in the
minutes. Every petition or other eo.mmunicati.on addressed to the Council shall be in
writing and shall be read in full upon presentation to the Council unless the Council
dispenses with the reading. Finch petition or other communication shall be recorded in the
minutes by tire and filed with the minutes in the office of the Clerk.
155,30 S_uspemion_or_,i_mendment_ol~_Rules. These rules may be suspended only by a
two-thirds vote of the members present and voting.
155.35 Salaries of Mayor and Council Members. Effective January 2, 19.95, the salary
of the Mayor shall be $375 per month ,and the salary of each Council Member shall be $250 per
mont~,,. (ORD. #70-1994, 8,2.9-94)
155.40 Worker's:Compensation. Pursuant to Minnesota. Statutes, 176.011, Subdivision
9, Clause 5, fl~e eleett~l o~i~s of Me City. and Municipal Officers. appointed for a regular term
of office shall i~-ineluded in: the City's coverage for Worker's Compensation under the Minnesota
Worker's .~, m~nsation Act. (ORD.//22-198'9 - 2-20-89)
-3112-
8/29/94
June 18, 2002
To: Mound Mayor Pat Meisel and Mound City Council Members Brown, Hanus, Meyer,
Osmek
From: Donna Smith
2531 Avon Drive
Mound, MN 55364
Tel: 472.4363
Re: Mound City Code 365.15 Subd. 9 (e) Temporary Signs dated 1/21/01
Recently garage sale signs have been removed from street corners in Mound by
community services officers. I believe that no one should leave their signs up past the sale
date, but I also believe that Mound residents should be allowed to place signs as they
have in the past. I have reviewed the attached code and would like you to consider these
changes. For (e) (3) "within the public way" is unclear. I put my garage sale signs near the
ground by stop signs but they never block the view of drivers. I remember that signs may
not be placed on telephone poles or light standards, and you might add street signs to
that.
Consider having residents place the dates of their sale on the sign. Consider having
residents put their house number on the sign. Then a community services officer could
return the sign to any offenders, and possibly ticket them if their s~gns were up past their
sale date. My signs are an important part of my successful garage sale, and I don~ want the
city to destroy them.
I'm retired now, and have lived in Mound all of my life. I support the city's efforts in
revitalization and growth, but I believe that if the city now begins to actively enforce a code
that was passed on January 21, 2001, it will irk law-abiding residents like me.
Summers are beautiful in Mound, and weekly garage saling is a favorite past time. Please
keep it from becoming a hassle for the fine people who live here.
cc: City Manager Kandis Hanson
-3113-
Mound City Code
365.15, Subd. ?
Subd. 7. Signs which interfere with the ability of vehicle operators or pedestrians to
see traffic signals or which impede the vision of traffic by vehicle operators or pedestrians
are prohibited. Such signs shall also comply with Subsection 350.750 of the Mound
Zoni~ Ordinance.
Subd. 8. Signs shall not obstruct any window, door, fire escape, or opening intended
to provide ingress or egress to any structure or building or public way.
Subd. 9. Temporary Signs
One temporary real estate sign may be placed in any district for the purpose of
advertising the lease or sale of property upon which it is placed. Only one such
sign shall be permitted per street and/or lake frontage. Such signs shall be exempt
from permits and fees providing they meet the following requirements:
(1) Such sign shall be removed seven (7) days following lease or sale.
(2) The maximum size of such signs for each district is as follows:
(i) R-l, and R-2 District - five (5) square feet.
(ii) R-3, R-4 and PDA Districts - eighteen (18) square feet.
(iii) B-i, B-2, B-3, and I-1 Districts - thirty-two (32) square feet.
Temporary real estate promotional signs may be erected for the purpose of selling
or promoting a residential project of ten (10) or more dwelling units or any
non-residential project. Such signs shall be exempt from permits and fees
provided:
(1) Such sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area.
(2)
(3)
Maximum height of ten (10) feet.
Maximum number of said temporary real estate advertising signs shall not
exceed two (2) in number.
(4)
Minimum distance between said advertising signs is five hundred (500)
feet. ~
Such signs shall be removed when the project is ninety (90) percent
complete, sold, or leased.
-3114-
Mound City Code
(6)
365.15, Subd. 9, (b), (6)
Such signs shall be located no closer than one hundred (100) feet to a
pre-existing residential dwelling unit.
Written approval from the property owner shall be submitted at the time of
City Council review.
Temporary banners and l~nnants employed for grand openings or business
establishments, special events and holidays shall be removed within thirty (30) days
affair erection. '
(d)
One temporaxy identification sign setting forth the name of the project, architect,
engineers, contractors, planners and financing agencies may be installed at a
construction site in any district. The sign area of said construction sign shall not
exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area. Such signs shall be removed when the
building is 75 percent occupied and shall be exempt from all permits and fees.
(e)
Garage sale signs will be permitted in conjunction with the sale of household goods
and materials from the private residences. Such signs shall be exempt from
pomaits and fees but shall be subject to the following:
(1) Signs shall not exceed four (4) square feet in area.
(2)
The name and telephone number of the party responsible for the sale shall
be clearly marked on the sign.
(3)
No signs shall be placed within the public way nor shall they be attached to
any telephone poles or light standards.
(4)
Directional off premise garage sale signs can be placed on private property
providing that the property owners consent is obtained prior to the
p.lacement of such signs.
(5)
The use of garage sale signs shall be limited to five (5) occasions per
calendar year per residence.
(6)
Boutiques, craft sales, and other sales events of hand-crafted merchandise
shall be subject to all garage sale signage provisions.
(7) Garage sale signs shall be limited to five (5) days per occurrence.
9
-3115-
0'I/21/01
Page 1 of 2
Kandis M. Hanson
From;
To:
Sent:
Attach:
Subject:
"Joanne Brandt" <Joanne. Brandt(~genmills.com>
<KandisHanson@cityofmound.com>
Wednesday, June 19, 2002 1:32 PM
anabnr2.gif; Nature Bkgrd.jpg
Thoughts about City Development
A few things I'd like to share with you, as a resident of Mound. I was very
disappointed to hear of the new developments for the city.
Using Lake Langdon for apartments is absurd!!!! Why use a beautiful natural
resource for transient apartment-dwellers? I know you say they will be
luxury .... but I have never seen a luxury apartment except in New York City or L.A.
Let's get real here!! Besides, there are already apartments on Lake Langdon and
they don't look too hot. I like the past developers' idea better, by putting up
luxury townhouses for permanent residents (over $250,000). PLEASE DO NOT PUT
APARTMENTS ON LAKE LANGDON!!!!!
Why do we need a "seniors" building on the main drag? Can't we keep the main
street for upscale shopping, nice restaurants, etc.? We don't want to clutter the
downtown area with apartments for Pete's Sake.
The downtown area will never look or even resemble Wayzata or even Excelsior (or
the new Maple Grove area). We need to rethink this plan. We need more than one
developer.
Last question: When are you going to tear down those horrible boarded-up
buildings on 1107 They looks peutrid!!
Please respond.
i'd also like my comments made known to the Mayor and to the Council. I don't
care if Pat Meisel owns part of Lake Langdon, I still think it should have very
upscale permanent homes on it.
Thanks for listening.
-3116- 06/19/2002
The Brimeyer Group, Inc.
TBG CONSULTI~IG
Fifty South Ninth Avenue
Suite 101
Hopkins, MN 55343
voice: (952) 945-0246
fax: (952) 945-0102
e-mail:brimgroup~aol.com
web: www. brimgroup.com
Summer Issue
June 2002
Vol. 10, Issue 2
Thoughts Ab°Ut the
Governance Model
by James Brimeyer
Several years ago, we ran a series of four
articles in The Brim Report based on the
book Boards That Make A Difference by
John Carver.
These articles used Carver's model for
governance to address the effectiveness of
governing for public and non-profit
boards, utilizing policy as a leadership
tool, focusing on results by clarifying the
organization's mission, and defining the
relationship between the Board and the
Chief Executive Officer. During this time, I
was elected to the St. Louis Park City
CounCil, and introduced the governance
model to the organization in 1997.
This governance model has remained an
important tool in The Brimeyer Group's
consulting work with city, county, school
board and non-profit clients.
Five years later I would like to share what
I have observed and learned by using this
model from both sides of the table.
What It Is
The model provides a process, even a
discipline, of derision making to help the
Board define issues and focus on desirable
results. It helps the CEO and staff by
providing a method to identify the issues,
consider the options and develop recom-
mendations that meet the organization's
mission.
The model talks about a Board focusing
on the outside world and moving toward
desired ends or outcomeS. It also discusses
how a Board needs to generate a powerful
mission statement that inCludes: · results terminolog)5
· succinct language, and
· is recognized and accepted both in
the community and within the
organization.
-3117-
In St. Louis Park, we feel fortunate to
have such a mission: "Our Community of
Choice for a Lifetime." Combined with
eight guiding principles (value state-
ments), our mission statement is clearly
defined and serves the organization and
the community well.
However, when lacking this guidance,
the model can still be effective if a board-
member will ask the following questions
(at least mentally):
-- Can I comfortably explain this decision
to an 8th grade civics class?
-- What will our successors say about
this decision five to ten years from now?
-- If this were your mone)5 would you
spend it on this program or proposal?
-- If it were free, is it still a good idea?
What It Is Not
The model discusses how Boards spen.
too much time on internal matters --
methods, structures, means (everyone
knows how to wash windows) versus
results (keep the building dean and well
maintained). The model will not prevent
these distractions from taking place. It
will not automatically produce better
derisions -- but it can.
What It Provides
The governance model is more than
strategic planning, which succeeds only
by the push of individuals. The model
takes control and builds the framework'
to motivate the organization by defining:
-- A sense of mission, vision, and values
that is shared by the Board.
--A philosophy, a process and/or disci-
pline held by the Board that produces
derisions resulting in desired outcomes.
-- A high level of trust between the
Board, the CEO and the staff which
holds the CEO/staff accountable for the
achievement of ends policies.
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
Kandis Hanson
Chief Len Harrell
Monthly Report for May, 2002
EMERGENCY 911
As I write my last monthly report to you and the city council, I would like to take
this opportunity to thank all of the men and women of the Mound Police Department who
have served this community with me for the last eighteen years. I would aIso like to
thank the council and its members both present and past for their support of the
department and m,~ career. I have ~h~.dmonde~ Opportunities here and have enjoyed
working for the citizens of Mound/I will cherish al4~s, the memories and friendships
developed here!
STATISTICS
The pollce department responded to 4~'~'Calls for service during the month
of May. offenses include 4
There were 73 Part II Those offenses include 2 child
abuse, 1 narcotics, 11
liquor 1~ :violations,'IQDUI;4 simPle assaUits, I0 domestics (3 with
assaults), 6 ~sment, and 15 o~r offenses.
The patrol diVisiOn iSsUed t06 adUtt~icitations and'9 juvenile citations.
Parking ViOlaflonsacc0untedfor an ~~I, I5-tickets, Warnings were
issued to~2f '~
There as 2 adult felons,arrested and 2 juve~es for felomes, and 30
adults were 2 adult
ti~Iony
The 2 with injuries.
There Mound
assisted assistance
OB 2
-3118-
toui POUC
~Y REPORT - May, 2002
II. I~v'ESTIGATION$
The Investigators worked on 4' child protectiOn and 7 cfimin~: sexual
conduct cases in May accounting for over 3'5 hours of'investigative _ti'me.
Other cases included burglary, assault, theft, controlled substance abuse,
obstructing, stolen vehicle, domestic assault, threats, personal injury
accident, witness tampering, damage to property, fraud, NSF checks,.
forgery, warrants, theR of identitiy, and absenting.
Formal complaints were issued for disorderly conduct, resisting, arrest,
domestic assault, worthless checks, open botQe, violation of an order for
protection,, misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor DUI, and gross
misdemeanor child' endangerment..
III. PERSONNEL/STAFFInG
The department used approximately 54 hours of overtime during the
month of May. Officers used 34.5 hours of comp-time, 221 hours of sick
time, and g7 hours of vacation. Officers earned 45 hours of comp time.
IV. TRAINING
Officers attended a department firearms training in the month of May.
V. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFI~
CSO Salter left at the end of May and no report was made available.
~. RESEKVES
The reserves donated 129 hours to the community in May. The unit
currently has eight members who contribute on a regular basis.
-3119-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MAY 2002
o~-~-~sEs CLEARED EXCEPT- C--~3~%RED BY ARBESTED
I~EPOR~ED UNFOUNDED CLF.%I~D ABI~EST ADULT JUV
Homicide
Crim~Lnal Sexual Conduct
· Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
Larceny
Vehicle Theft
Arson
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 0 0 0 0
14 0 0 2 0 2
3 0 0 1 ! 0
2 0 0 1 i 0
23 I 0 4 2 2
Child Abuse/Neglect
Forgery/NSF Checks
Criminal Damage to Property
Weapons
Narcotic Laws
Liquor Laws
DWI
Simple Assault
Domestic Assault
Domestic (No Assault)
Harassment
Juvenile Status Offenses
Public Peace
Trespassing
Ail Other Offenses
2 I 0 0 0 0
7 0 2 i i 0
7 2 1 i 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 11 10 3
10 0 0 10 10 0
4 0 1 1 1 0
3 0 0 3 2 1
7 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 3 0 0 0
3 0 0 2 0 2
2 0 0 2 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0 0 5 4 1
TOTAL
73 4 7 36 30 8
PART II & PART IV
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Medicals
Animal Complaints
Mutual Aid
Other General Investigations
TOTAL
12
2
0
20
23
15
278
350
HCCP
Inspections
452
4O
32 10
-3120-
MOUND POLICE DEPART~
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT MAY 2002
GENERAL ACTIVITY SU~RY
Hazardous Citations
Non-Hazardous Citations
Hazardous Warnings
Non-Hazardous Warnings
Verbal Warnings
Parking Citations
DWI
Over .10
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Adult Felony Arrests
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
Juvenile Felony Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
Part I Offenses
Part II Offenses
Medicals
Animal Complaints
Ordinance Violations
Other Public Contacts
THIS YEAR TO LAST YEAR
~0NTH DATE TO DATE
68 286 289
32 145 161
2 13 82
16 87 259
105 429 353
15 137 305
10 21 34
5 14 33
12 56 46
2 23 6
0 0 0
4 18 11
33 112 154
2 7 6
8 64 74
23 120 158
73 299 312
20 113 123
23 179 246
0 105 135
278 2,051 2,539
Assists
Follow-Ups
HCCP
Mutual Aid Given
Mutal Aid Requested
731 4,279 5,326
53 195 197
14 70 342
6 14 20
15 66 54
2 18 30
-3121 -
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MAY 2002
DWI
More Than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired or No Plates
Stop Arm Violations
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Code Enforcement
Seat Belt
Overweight Vehicles
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
10
5
1
8
0
52
1
0
8
0
6
0
1
1
2
1
0
15
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
-3122-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MAY 2002
Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
WA/~RANTARRESTS
Felony
Misdemeanor
5
3
2
0
1
6
0
0
0
3
2O
2
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-3123-
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
May 2002
41.67%
May 2002 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED
GENERAL FUND
Council 79,280 4,846
City Manager/Clerk 235,100 27,055
Elections 11,030 15
Finance 201,260 23,102
Assessing 79,700 1
Legal 122,000 8,445
City Property 89,110 8,591
Computer 28,250 7,991
Police 1,164,600 109,607
Emergency Prepardeness 6,780 563
Planning/Inspections 266,030 25,901
Streets 576,610 63,534
Parks 322,240 26,664
Transfers 207,840 17,320
Cable TV 48,000 40
Contingencies 60,860 (7,744)
30,634
96,677
890
78,921
118
36,402
34,686
17,245
408,719
3,591
95,606
223,475
135,733
86,600
110
(1,037)
48 646
138 423
10140
122 339
79 582
85 598
54 424
11 005
755 881
3 189
170,424
353,135
186,507
121,240
47,890
61,897
38.64%
41.12%
8.07%
39.21%
0.15%
29.84%
38.92%
61.04%
35.10%
52.96%
35.94%
38.76%
42.12%
41.67%
0.23%
-1.70%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3,498,690
315,931 1,248,370 2,250,320 35.68%
Area Fire
Service Fund 699,470
Cemetery Fund 9,920
Dock Fund 132,700
TIF 1-2 0
Water Fund 577,660
Sewer Fund 1,007,420
Liquor Fund 460,660
Recycling Fund 155,510
Storm Water 58,200
16,650 279,167 420,303 39.91%
175 1,111 8,809 11.20%
4,811 25,726 106,974 19.39%
239,766 320,616 (320,616)
113,983 328,014 249,646 56.78%
69,582 446,119 561,301 44.28%
32,068 176,893 283,767 38.40%
12,537 39,448 116,062 25.37%
12,629 33,321 24,879 57.25%
Exp-01
06117~2002
Gino
-3124-
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
May 2002
41.67%
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Business Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Other Revenue
Transfers
from Other Funds
Charges to Other
Departments
May 2002 YTD
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE
2,253,520 0 0
6,300 860 3,825
188,450 31,761 115,510
461,130 0 40,400
137,550 14,604 50,577
110,000 7,566 29,719
145,400 8,818 84,752
128,000 0 0
13.000 709 5,159
PERCENT
VARIANCE RECEIVED
(2,253,520) 0.00%
(2,475) 60.71%
(72,940) 61.29%
(420,730) 8.76%
(86,973) 36.77%
(80,281) 27.02%
(60,648) 58.29%
(128,000) 0.00%
(7,841) 39.68%
TOTAL REVENUE
3,443,350 64,318
329,942 (3.113.408) 9.58%
FIRE FUND 429,470 47,936 228,538 (200,932) 53.21%
CEMETERY FUND 6,050 900 2,200 (3,850) 36.36%
DOCK FUND 129,360 1,796 111,366 (17,994) 86.09%
WATER FUND 535,500 44,485 227,201 (308,299) 42.43%
SEWER FUND 1,048,810 86,225 424,973 (623,837) 40.52%
LIQUOR FUND 2,050,000 167,138 689,127 (1,360,873) 33.62%
RECYCLING FUND 127,880 15,375 43,464 (84,416) 33.99%
STORM WATER UTILITY 112,000 9,159 45,735 (66,265) 40.83%
06117~2002
rev01
Gino
-3125-
General Fund $553,264
CDBG 1,114
Area Fire Protection Services 232,275
Grant Revolving 8,995
Cemetery (1,501)
Dock 213,230
PW Facility 68,731
G.O. Improvement Bonds (19,520)
Commerce Place TIF (66,734)
G.O. Bonds 2001 - A (40)
G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 19,147
Capital Improvement 1,627,319
MSA 20,520
Sealcoat 3,325
CDB (258)
Downtown TIF 1-2 (1,929,592)
Water 1,268,057
Sewer 1,044,733
Liquor Store 1,376,763
Recycling 83,611
Storm Water 843,754
Fire Relief (45,383)
HRA 0
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated/resened resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Imestment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the ~ear and is not included.
A long and complete process is followsd to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the ~ear. In addition, the audit from the
independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensi~ Report
will be presented to the CityCouncil and made a~ailable to interested parties.
In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds
available for spending.
06/14/2002
CashReportCouncil
Gino
-3126-
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
LG555 - Gover.n. ment Approval or Acknowledgment For Use of
Gambhng Funds(previouslyLG503andLG265) ' (11/0i)
! organization Information (please Print)
Expenditure Description (attach additional sheets if necessary)
1. Amount of.proposed lawful purpose expenditure [ $~
2. Check the appropriate expenditure category:
.j!~. C~ion to a unit of government - United States, state of Minnesota, or any of its subdivisions,
agencies, or instrumentalities. NOTE: A contribution may not be mede directly to a law enforc~mlent or
prosecutorial agency, such as a police department, county sheriff~ or county attorney.
A wfldlife management project that benefits the public at large with approval of the state agency that has
authority over the project.
Describe the proposed expenditure, including vendors.
. _ _ Grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle trails with approval by DNR. All trails must be
open to public use.
Describe the proposed expenditure, including vendors.
Oath
· I affirm that the contribution or expenditure, in accordance with Minnesota Rule 7861.0120, subpart 5D(10), does not
result in any net monetary gain or other pecuniary benefit to our organization.
· I affirm that when lawful gambling funds are used for grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle trails
or for any.wildlife manageme, n,J~oroj~'.~t, for which reimbursement is received from a unit of government, the reimburse-
m,n ? =.must be gemb,ng ao ount,.nd recorded on the L 1010-Schedule C/D
~ executive ~at~lre ~ phone number ' ~ '
ApprovallAcknow~e'4gme"t.,, . '
Government
By signature below, the representative of the unit of government o approves the project as dascribed above, and/or
· acknowledges the contribution, which will not be used for a pension or retirement fund.
Unit of Government
,Z~dress City
Trde
Keep this completed form attached to the LG1010 - Schedule CID in your organization's records.
This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e.
large print, Braille) upon request. If you use a TTY, you can
call us by using the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800-627-
3529 and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000.
The information requested on this form will become public
information, when requested by the Board, and will be used
to determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and
rules governing lawful gambling activities. For additional
information, check our web site at ww.gcb.state.mn.us
-3127-
2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364
VFW POST 5113
5/1/02
I am writing you requesting money for
our department to purchase an AED (automatic external
defibrillator). This piece of equipment is used on patients in
cardiac arrest and is the most important tool to revive a
patient. We currently have one on our rescue truck and are
looking to purchase another one to put on one of our
engines. Since the mound fire department responds to
approx. 325 medical calls and about 425 fire calls annually
and usually first on the scene so the defibrillator is an
important piece of equipment. We have saved countless
lives with this piece of equipment and feel it is necessary to
purchase another unit. We have raised $1000.00 towards
this purchase but we are still short about $1500.00. This
was also something we could not budget for because of the
substantial cost. We thank you for all of your support in the
past without organizations like yours we would not have
the equipment we do. If you have any questions feel free to
contact one of us and we will answer them for you.
Thank you
Tony Myers and Dan Grady
Mound fire department
-3128-
bear Ms. Hanson,
Thank you for your reply. Also thank you for clarifying
those few things for me, it was very helpful. I guess my idea to
restore EVERYTHING this year was a little to out of hands for
me. Although I do have another idea. it seems as if everything is
very expensive, but with help. from you and [, [ think that we
will be able to pull off just the parade. I could go around
putting up flyers asking community citizens for their volunteer
work, and/or money donations. Maybe even an article in the
laker. Please, lets try it. It just doesn't seem like a regular
summer with out getting up early on that Saturday morning .... so
excited to get to the good old parade. Also I know this takes
much planning, so the parade doesn't have to be on it's normal
June date, it can be anytime, even towards the end of the
summer. If we. get a move on right now I think we can make it
happen. Please write back as quickly as possible, if this is ok
with you. Again thank you sooooooo much for your time and
effort.
Sincerely,
Po!ge Robertson
6th' groder at GrdndView Middle :;' ~'~
. School
06-14-2002 10:00AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO
~O?l Sun~J~ D~e Box ~5
Spring Park, MN 55384-0385
P hone- 952-471-7125
Fax- 95~-471-9151
E-mail- Imcc~uswest.net
9524720620 P.01
F;,~x: P~:
Phor~. Date=
Re:.
[] Ureent [] For Review D Pla Comment [] Ple,;L~e Repl'y ~ Please Recycle,
If you do not receive all of the pages, please contact our office as soon as possible at 952-47t.7125
-3130-
0G-14-2002 10:00AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 9524720G20 P.02
~mmollf $
-3131 -
06-14-2002 10:01AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 95247206~0 P.03
-3132- TOTAL P. 03
CITY OF MOUHD
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 06/10/02
Date printed 06/12/02
The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Wednesday, June 10, 2002 at Mound Fire Station:
Present;
Greg Pederson Fire Chief GP
Sarah Smith City of Mound SS
Todd Christopherson Amcon TC
Matt Simoneau Building Off. MS
Greg Palm City GPalm
Scott Alden City SA
Kandis Hanson City KH
John Cameron MFRA JC
Sam Bontrager SEH SB
Jeff Anderson City JA
John McKinley City JM
Jim Prosser Ehlers JP
Len Harrell Police Chief LH
(part of meeting)
1. JC said that the borings are all staked and elevations are set.
The cost of the new well project was discussed. There is some contingency available in the west end watermain
project. The water fund could be tapped to fund the difference. We don't need to include any cost into this
project budget for the new well construction.
3. JC is working with Excel on whether or not the utilities can be lowered and at what cost. No answer yet. Should
have some info next week.
4. Discussed ponding. SEH is working on this issue. JC said that a pond is required to control rate of runoff. SEH
is doing calculations to determine size of pond.
5. One option is to do a trade offwith the City parking lot and put a pond in at the west of the existing city hall. This
would require tree removal.
6. GP gave an update on the cost of the lease and the timing issues. The landlord has another potential tenant and
does not want to give Fire department as much space as they were planning on.
SB gave an update on the design. Parking is an issue. The city does not have a zoning requirement for parking
at municipal facilities, so it must be designed to meet design committee requirements. KH stressed that design
should be adequate as City Hall is currently short of parking.
8. Discussed the zoning requirements for building height. We are in R zoning. Special elements get different
treatment in the code; it is likely that the hose tower could be consider an exception to the height restriction.
SA updated the checking he did into the residential lot next door to the fire station. He said it is 25,000 SF site
area. The minimum lot size in Mound is 10,000 SF. It is possible that part of the lot could be used for the project
and part of the lot could be split off and sold as a buildable lot. It is also possible that a smaller portion of the site
could be purchased for the project and the house left in place on the smaller remaining lot.
10. Building permit - MS said that they are planning a monthly meeting with SEH to review permit status and timing.
11. SS said that planning commission discussed the project last week. They asked for more information. SS had
asked for a resolution confirming that the project and site were consistent with the comp plan.
C:\WlNDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content.lE5\SNIZTD8R~lPS 06 10 02.doc
-3133-
Page 1 of 2
Meeting held on 06/10/02
Date printed 06/12/02
CITY OF MOrillO
12. Deadline is 6~28. 7/15 is planning. Council target is 7/23/02.
13. TC to direct Braun to coordinate with JM at PD for access to the site for drilling. Drilling is expected to take place
Wednesday through Friday this week.
14. JP joined the meeting at this point. KH gave an update on the well construction for JP's benefit.
15.
Financing the project. JP said we are scheduled to sell bonds next Tuesday. The City qualifies for insurance to
have the issue upgraded. The interest savings will reduce the annual debt service by $50 to 75,000. In order to
get this savings, an up front fee will be paid for the insurance - somewhere in the order of $125 to 150,000.
16. The bond market is very good right now, so timing is great.
17. Wednesday at 5 PM there is a meeting at City Hall with other Cities to discuss the fire contracts. The contracts
are 3 years. They have asked the Cities to do a simple resolution supporting the project and ongoing contracts.
18. KH, JP, and GP will have a conference call on Tuesday with Moody's to discuss the bond and payments.
19. The HRA and Council will deal with the leases and the bonds at the 6/25 meeting.
20. Reviewed the budget. It was agreed that the contingency line items would be combined into one $500 k item.
This is the HRA line item that requires their approval prior to expenditure.
21. At this point, the design committee meeting started. JP left. LH joined the meeting.
22. Reviewed some parking options - putting parking on Maywood. One of the options discussed previously was to
go to one way on Maywood. TC suggested that the ideas discussed need to be analyzed by SEH traffic
engineering experts. The one-way idea is not good per KH, as there is already an intersection to the North that
is prone to accidents. One-way on Maywood would direct more traffic to that intersection.
23. There are a number of retaining walls shown and required to make the grade changes work out.
24. Discussed pushing the building to the east to allow more parking along the retaining wall. This is difficult, as it
does not allow the trucks to be parked in front of the building without pushing into the street.
25. Discussed the retaining walls to the South. TC said that the wall would require construction access and
permanent access for structural support at least 10 behind the wall. It is currently shown to be right at the
property line.
26. Discussed purchasing all or part of the property adjacent to the Fire Station to the South. This would allow more
room for parking and drives as well.
27. The kennel location was discussed as well as some ideas of how to mitigate barking noise.
28. There are no hazardous chemicals stored in the garage area. Only a few quarts of oil and windshield washer
fluid.
29. Discussed the apparatus bay. TC pointed out that a row of columns in the bay will be critical to keeping the
structure cost in line - to free span would be a substantial increase in building cost.
30. Reviewed the fire department areas. SB and TC to meet this week to discuss building efficiency.
31. Meeting was adjourned at 7:30 PM. Notify TC of any missing or inaccurate items above.
C:\WlNDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content.lE5\SNIZTD8R~vlPS 06 10 02.doc
-3134-
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF MOUHD
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 06/12./02
Date printed 06/17/02
The meeting was convened at 2 PM Wednesday, June 12, 2002 at Amcon:
Present:
Todd Christopherson Amcon TC
Sam Bontrager SEH SB
1. Meeting was held to review plans and discuss cost savings ideas.
2. Discussed the potential ponding near the NE corner of the proposed building. Preliminary SEH calculations
show a pond of 6,000 SF with an average depth of 2 feet will suffice.
3. The retaining walls were discussed. The taller walls will require substantial setbacks from property lines or
easements to allow construction and permanent structural support (geo-grid tiebacks).
Discussed a line indicating "limits of construction" on the plan. The current grading plan shows re-grading the
entire existing south parking lot at City hall as well as the western Wooded area. SB will revise to leave existing
parking lot as is except at new drive transition at SE corner of lot.
Discussed the setback at the corner of Maywood and Wilshire. The setback line is curved because the property
line right of way line is curved. TC suggested a variance or revision of the right of way line to allow a more
rectangular building footprint. A call was place to Sarah to see what likelihood of either option would be. Left a
message requesting a quick response, as this will determine what SEH will do with plans.
Discussed the building footprint and the "un-excavated" areas. SB will attempt to revise building footprint so that
lower and main levels are same size and aligned. The upper level will be slightly smaller than the two lower
levels.
Discussed the retaining walls separating the lower level from the main level inside the building. These will be
poured concrete, as they are 14' high to match the floor to floor difference in elevation. The walls on the main
level will also be located so that rooms on the main level will not have expansion joints in middle of rooms (where
floor transitions from slab on grade to structural) Ideally, this expansion joint will be at the edge of a room (the
kitchen, others) along the wall.
8. Discussed the kennel area - is there a way to build it into the main rectangular building footprint so that it is not
sticking out. Similar for the two stair wells. SB to investigate.
The schedule calls for moving from schematic design to design development on June 24. The changes
discussed are in line with schematic level design decisions and will represent significant cost reductions to the
current plan. If program areas are to be maintained, the changes need to be incorporated to maintain project
budget.
10. Meeting was adjourned at 3:30 PM. Notify TC of any missing or inaccurate items above.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~496BCDEFWIPS 06 12 02.doc
-3135-
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF MOUND
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 06117/02
Date printed 06/18/02
The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, June 17, 2002 at Mound Fire Station:
Present:
Greg Pederson Mound Fire GP
Sarah Smith City of Mound SS
Todd Christopherson Amcon TC
Matt Simoneau Building Off. MS
Kandis Hanson City KH
Greg Palm City Gpalm
Tim Palm City TP
Sam Bontrager SEH SB
Miles Britz SEH MB
John McKinley City JM
1.
SS and JA will be at the Planning Commission meeting tonight to discuss the project and the process for
approvals. This should give them a heads up on what is coming soon.
2. Plans should be available to SS on or about 6/28 as planned for submittal for planning commission.
3. SS has labels ready for public hearing.
4. We will request a variance on the height.
5. We will not require a variance on the setback, as we will stay with the curved front that was previously planned
and fits within the setbacks.
6. The SAC unit determination is 5 units; there is a credit of 3 for the existing. The net add of two SAC units is in
the budget.
KH reported on the financing. The other communities called a meeting of Mayors, Managers, and others to
review the project. Orono and Minnetrista want to own the real estate and are having difficulty justifying paying
for real estate in another city. They value the fire service and don't want to switch; however, they are hung up on
the real estate issue. Mayor Meisel suggested the costs could be assessed in another manner.
8. Minnetonka Beach, Shorewood, and Spring Park are concerned that if the bigger communities drop out, their
share would increase.
A letter written by JP and edited by KH and Mayor Meisel was issued today saying that their deadline has
passed for accepting the proposal. They are going to ask for a five-year commitment to have a more stable
membership.
10. The existing fire department service agreements with the other communities already cover capital improvements
such as new structures.
11. TC said that the budget has not changed since presented to the council last week. There have been significant
strides in the last few days in getting the design to fit within the project budget.
12. KH indicated that the elimination of the curved wall at the corner should be done as last resort and is important to
the image of the project.
13. Storm water ponding is better defined now. It should fit into the triangle area located west and North of the police
garage entry.
A ~~~N Page 1 of 3
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content. IE5\SNiZTDSR~VIPS 06 17 02.doc
-3136-
Meeting held on 06/17/02
Date printed 06/18/02
CITY OF MOUND
14. Title transfer - this is not yet done.
KH to follow up on this item.
15. KH is forwarding the meeting minutes to Jill in Florida. She will be doing a newsletter.
16. Braun was on site today looking at the existing building as part of their phase I environmental audit. No word yet
on results.
17. The borings are under way. Skinner coordinated the private utility locations with Braun and no lines were hit or
damaged.
18. SS updated the land use process. Things are under way as planned and no problems anticipated.
19.
KH said that she and GP would try to meet with seller of adjacent property this week to discuss the triangle of
land that is of interest to the City. They will attempt to meet with both sellers and at the Fire Department. The
idea of purchasing the entire house and lot will not be pursued, just the triangle we looked at.
20.
The MFRA survey does not show the entire existing house to the South. There is an older survey that the City
has from the plans that were done when the well structure was done. That survey shows the entire house and
the storage building. The existing fence is actually partly on the house lot and partly on the City property. SB will
call JC first thing in AM and see if he can re-issue the survey showing the entire existing house and storage
building. SEH will take this info and incorporate into the site plan. This will hopefully be available in time for GP
and KH meeting with the neighbors.
21. It appears that purchase of the triangle by the City will not create a setback or other zoning problem for the
remaining property.
22. SB reviewed the plan and showed changes made since last week based upon SEH and Amcon meeting last
Thursday.
23. The plan is now based upon on street parallel parking on the north side of the building.
24.
The pond is shown on the current plan. There is about a 4' high wall going up to where the police parking area
is. There is about 5 feet of space between that retaining wall and the curb so those cars do not hang over the
wall when the tires are up to the curb.
25. There is one handicap-parking stall required. We discussed having a public handicap space at the east,
accessed from the apparatus driveway for safety. The staff handicap spot would be located at the lower police
staff parking area outside of the garage area.
26. Discussed having parallel parking on the west side of Wilshire in front of the building. The right of way would be
widened so that the parking there is not on the street itself.
27. SB reviewed the building changes on the three floor plans. The curved wall is in tact, and can be used to help
meet the City design criteria with awnings or some other architectural elements.
28. The shared room for copy machine and other high cost equipment that could be shared is now located behind
the reception area. Sight lines should be maintained so that either police or fire receptionist working in the copy
room can still see the front counter.
29. Discussed mailbox locations. This could be done in the shared copy room as well.
30. There is some functional and relational inefficiency in the new plan, however, the changes were done in the
interest of significant cost savings and so some compromises are acceptable to the police and fire departments.
As an example, the flrefighters now will have to go to the basement level to work out and shower and then back
up the third level for the day room and future bunkrooms. This is not ideal, however it will be acceptable.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content.lE5\SNIZTD8R'~lPS 06 17 02.doc
-3137-
Page 2 of 3
Meeting held on 06/17/02
Date pdnted 06/18/02
cl'rY OF 14~IJHD
31. SB reviewed the proposed elevations and his ideas for the curved wall. This is where the design will pick up on
some of the city design standards.
32. The next meeting will be at 6 PM for the building team and 7 PM for the design team. Those who want to meet
early at 5 PM at Happy Garden for Dinner are welcome. The following week, we will be back on our regular
schedule with some modification. The meetings do not need as much time now, so we will start at 4:30 PM for
Building Committee and 5:30 to 7 PM for Design Committee meetings from that point forward.
33. Meeting adjoumed at 6:30 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content, lE5\SNIZTD8R~vlPS 06 17 02.doc
-3138-
Page 3 of 3
Mound Public Safety Facility 06/20/2002
Mound, MN
Funding Source
Lease Revenue bond Sale Project Funds
HRA Contingency
Water fund bond Proceeds
Expenditures
Pr~ect Development Co,ts NE Base Fee
NE Reimbursables
Scope Change Contingency
Land Costs
Legal Fees/Non Bond
Financing Costs/Non Bond
Soft Cost - Miscellaneous to date
City Road & Utility Fees (SAC)
Public Utility charges
Geotechnical/Environmental Services
Surveying
Bid Advertisement and Printing
Lease Cost of Temporary Facility
Moving Costs (two moves)
Construction Testing
Furnishings and Eauioment
FFE
Audio visual Systems
Security and Access Systems
Telephone System
Computer Network
Budget Work Sheet
June-02
Schematic Budget
Estimate
Total
I
Budget
5,350,000 Ehlers/City
500,000 Ehlers/City
Ehlers/City
5,850,00..~J
SEH
SEH
SEH
City of Mound
Kennedy/Graven
Miscellaneous
MCES
Excel
Braun
MFRA
To be Bid
In Construction Cost
Sub-totals
371,250 SEH
30,500 SEH
50,000 SEH
0 City
2,000 Kennedy Graven
3,000 Ehlers
48,832 City of Mound - Geno
2,400 City
50,000 MFRNAmcon
8,300 Amcon
8,000 City
30,000 Amcon
47,880 City
15,100 City
0 Amcon
667,262
Owner
To be bid
To be bid
To be bid
To be bid
132,000 City
8,500 City
14,400 City
17,200 City
3,700 City
Subtotals
175,800
Construction Cost
Building Hard Costs
Construction Manager Fee
Site Improvements
Demolition of Existing
Removal of Well
New (replacement well)
Contingency/Bidding & Construction
Recommended Alternates
Uncommited Funds
Contractors (to be bid)
Amcon CM
Included in Building
To be bid
Included in Demolition
NOT included in project
Sub-totals
Totals
(Fund Shortage)
4,218,438 Amcon
128,500 Amcon
0 Amcon
60,000 Amcon
0 City/Amcon
o city
500,000 Amcon
100,000 Amcon
5,006,938
$5,850,000
IL
AMCON
-3139-
cost est MPS 6 20.xls
Total Project Cost