2002-07-23PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 23, 2002 - 6:45 PM
MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
OPEN MEETING
FACILITIES TOUR: PART I - CITY HALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3428-3439
APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS
*CONSENT AGENDA
*A. APPROVE MINUTES: JULY 9, 2002 REGULAR MEETING
*B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
*C. APPROVE BID DATE FOR 2002 RETAINING WALL PROJECT: 8/21
*D. APPROVE PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. 3 FOR IM~PROVEMENT
PROJECT 2002 - MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION
*E. APPROVE PROGRESS PAYMENT NO. 2 AND CHANGE ORDER
NO. 1 FOR WESTEDGE BLVD WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
APPROVE PLANNING CASE #02-23: BILL BAKER
4948 WILSHIRE BLVD
V~"4CE(S)
ACTION ON ONE-DAY PERMIT TO ALLOW 3.2 BEER/WINE IN
MOUND BAY PARK FOR EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION
*F.
*G.
3440-3447
3448-3477
3478-3482
3483-3487
3488-3521
o
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY
ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CASE #02-24/02-25'
MOLrND PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
2415 WILSHIRE BLVD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARIANCES
3522-3569
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
8. REPORT ON PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING PROJECT BY AMCON & SHE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
A. CASE ~02-11: JOHN & KATHY AQUILINA
3030 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE
VARIANCE
ACTION ITEMS
1. BOARD OF APPEALS - REVIEW & ACTION APPROVING
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS MADE TO STRUCTURE
2. ACTION ON RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCE
REQUEST
10.
DIRECTION/ACTION REGARDING 2002 STORM SEW-ER IMPROVEMENT
BIDS
11. DIRECTION/ACTION REGARDING WELL PROJECT
12. ACTION ON BALBOA OPTION AGREEMENT
(Discuss the next two items concurrent with the reconvened HRA meeting.)
13.
ACTION ON PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH
DEVELOPER FOR DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
14. ACTION RESETTING MEETING DUE TO ELECTION DAY: RECOMMEND 9/9
15.
MARK & NACOLE SCHUTZ, REPRESENTING "FISHERS OF MEN" FISHING
TOURNAMENTS ON AUG 3 & 17
16. ACTION RENAMING MOUND LIQUOR STORE
17.
EXECUTIVE SESSION ON MATTER OF LITIGATION BY JOHN M ANDERSON,
ET AL, REGARDING THE DREAMWOOD ADDITION (This item may be moved,
depending upon the availability of the attending attorney.)
18.
INFORMATION/MIS CELLANEOUS
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
LMCC calendar for August
Met Council newsletter
Report: Mound Police Department - June 2002
Hennepin County Community Forum - July 30
Report: Finance Department - June 2002
Report: Post Office
Report: Redevelopment Project Team
19. ADJOURN
This ix a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting.
agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. cio, ofmound, com.
3570-3578
3579-3645
3646-3650
3651-3652
3653-3654
3655-3666
3667-3670
3671
3672-3674
3675-3678
3679-3701
3702-3704
3705-3707
3708-3709
3710-3712
More current meeting
COUNCIL BRIEFING
July 23, 2002
Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
July 23 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
JUly 23 ~ 6;:45 :CC re~'meeting'
July 25 - City Hall closes at 2:30 for employee appreciation events
Aug 1 - Employee picnic - Mound Bay Park
Aug 13 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Aug 13 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
#2. City Hall Tour
In June 2003, the Police Department will move to the new Public Safety building. With that, the Finance
Department, including Utility Billing, will move into that space. In order for that to happen, certain changes
and improvements need to occur. The tour of city hall will highlight those needs and other pressing needs
required to make the building safe and livable.
#14. Moving the HRA & Council Meetings
The Sept 10 meeting must be moved because it is primary election day. The 2003 Budget must be approved at
first meeting of the month--before Sept 15. I am suggesting Sept 9. The room will be mostly set up for
elections that begin at 7 a.m., but we can work around that.
#15. Fishing Tournament
Representatives for the fishing tournaments recently approved wish to discuss the fee requirement for their
events.
#16. Renaming the Liquor Store
All the suggested names were considered by the Mound Liquor Management Team. Of the two suggestions, it
is my opinion that By the Bay Wine and Spirits is too long. I would recommend the second suggestion--Harbor
Wine and Spirits. The name, when submitted, was of English derivation--Harbour Wine and Spirits. It is the
Staff's opinion that most people will misspell it and spell it Harbor--the traditional spelling. From a pure
marketing standpoint--I think Harbor Wine and Spirits is suitable.
Other
I will be asking the council to approve the addition of an item to the agenda. We need to discuss the potential of
setting a special budget workshop on Aug 20. Please bring your calendars.
Human Resources
Interviews for the Administrative Assistant to assist the sewer, water, streets, docks and parks divisions, are
scheduled for July 30 and 31. We received over 70 applications, so processing took a long time.
Interviews of staff, council members and community members are scheduled over the next week. Please make
every effort to meet with Brimeyer. We want the new police chief to be the pick of the community. Thanks!
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofrnound.com
July 16, 2002
TO: Honorable Mayor & city Cou~ ^/-~
FROM: Jim Fackler, Parks Directo~
REF: City Hall Tour
I have been asked to be present during your tour of City
Hall prior to the City Council meeting on July 23, 2002.
Attached you will note the floor plans for the current use
and the proposed once the Police Department Bas moved to
their new facility.
As you walk around City Hall and make note of the needs I
would just like to high light a few points;
* Interior and exterior painting.
* Repair of exterior siding and check for mold.
* Window repair.
* Sun shielding of sky lights.
* Main entrance walkway replaced.
* Install main entrance Handi-cap doors.
* Interior painting.
* Improve interior lighting.
* Carpeting through the building.
* Improve fresh air handling.
* Improve heat and air conditioning circulation.
* Improve work station with ergonomic furniture.
* Remodel staff break area.
* Remodel fitness area.
* New interior signs.
* Remodel lobby, reception and copy areas.
* Install updated audio & video for city Hall.
If there is any information that you feel I need to have
prior to the tour please fell free to contact me at
952-472-0611 or E-mail JimFackler@cityofmound.com.
~__ pdnted on ~c~d paper
3428-
PROP 0 S ED
SPACE
USE
?
-3429-
UPPER LEVEL
SMALL
CONF.
CITY
MANAGER
MAIN LEVEL~ -3430-
LOWER LEVEL
-3431 -
Finance Department
July 17, 2002
Needs for lower levels to convert them for the finance department:
1. Phone lines
2. DSL connections
3. Network connection for financial system
E, tist-ing-eo ~unter - -remove.glass
5.' Entrance door - some minor modifications
6. Copy machine
7. One storage room in lower level
8. New carpet
9. Wall painting
It is our understanding that we will be taking with us all desks, filing cabinets, tables, etc.
that we have now.
-3432-
CURRENT
SPACE
USE
-3433-
-3434-
Ii.
-343.6-
i V1-
3437-
-3438-
-3439-'
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 9~ 2002
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular
session on Tuesday, July 9, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek and Peter Meyer
Others Present: City Attorney, John Dean; Acting City Manager, Gino Businaro;
Community Development Director; Sarah Smith; City Planner, Bruce Chamberlain;
Darcy Arone, Betty Brody, Linda Kohl, Kristin Vandenheuvel, Karen Wahl, Frank
Weiland, Ann Eberhart, Scott Thoma, John Anderson, Bob & Kathy Goodfellow, Bruce
McKeeman, Julie Weisenhorn, Tim Becker, Jim Strommen, Todd Landon, Tim Whitten
1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was
recited.
2. APPROVE AGENDA~ WITH ANY AMENDMENTS.
Meisel asked that the following items be added; 5A - Executive Session, and 5B -
Phosphorous Fertilizers.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Meyer to approve the agenda with amendments. All
voted in favor. Motion carried.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call
vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve minutes of the June 25, 2002, regular meeting.
B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $307,414.12.
C. Approve agreement for volunteer Police Services for the 2002 PGA
Championship
D. Approve agreement for law enforcement personnel services with the Metropolitan
Airport Commission.
E. Approve tree removal license for Legacy Tree Care of Maple Grove, MN
4. COMMENTS AND SUGGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM
NOT ONTHEAGENDA
Bruce McKeeman, 1744 Avocet Lane, indicated that he hoped to come with good news
regarding the non-abutters / abutters in Dreamwood, however he has learned that the
abutters are moving forward with a lawsuit. He made a formal request that the City
continue to manage the Dreamwood Commons.
!
-3440-
Mound City Council Minutes - July 9, 2002
He distributed a proposal that has been presented to the abutters, to the City Council.
John Anderson, 1733 Gull Lane, confirmed that legal action has been undertaken by the
abutting properties and stated that both parties have and will continue to negotiate in
good faith.
Scott Thoma, 1716 Eagle Lane, commented that this is a disappointing day today
because he spent many hours on this proposal and to learn that the City has been filed
upon by the abutters. He further commented that they appreciate the efforts of the
City regarding the docks program and that the people in their neighborhood encourage
the City to maintain the program the way it is.
Bob Goodfellow, 1730 Avocet, commented that he was part of the non-abutters group
who have been meeting over the course of several months.
John Anderson clarified that in his opinion that the abutters group used the Woodland
Point settlement as a starting point however the non-abutters started at square one.
John Dean commented that there is no reason to go over where negotiations broke
down in the past and that the City Council would be going into executive session shortly
to review and discuss the matter. He commented that the courts will determine whether
or not the City has the right to run a dock program on the Commons in this area.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case #02-18: Planned Development Area for Lan.qdon Bay Subdivision -
Conditional Use Permit- Rottlund Homes/RH Homes
Sarah Smith provided an overview of the CUP amendment request of allowing
hardcover up to thirty-three (33) percent on certain lots, which will allow buyers to have
a variety of home plans to select from when lots are sold. The Planning Commission as
recommended approval of this CUP amendment.
Tim Whitten of Rottlund Homes clarified that the development will maintain an overall
hardcover average of thirty (30) percent and thanked the City Council.
Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
Kris Vandenheuvel, 6165 Sugar Mill Lane, commented that some of the subject lots are
located close to her home and expressed concern regarding the mass of the structure.
Mayor Meisel closed the hearing at 7:48 p.m.
-3441 -
Mound City Council Minutes - July 9, 2002
MOTION by Brown to adopt the following resolution. Hanus seconded the motion and
offered a friendly amendment that excluded the lots already sold, from the resolution.
All voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-72:
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA- CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR THE LANGDON BY RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION TO EXCEED THE THIRTY (30) PERCENT
HARDCOVER RESTRICTION FOR CERTAIN LOTS IN
LANGDON BAY.
5A. EXECUTIVE SESSION
City Attorney John Dean indicated that the City has been served with a summons and
complaint relating to the commons in the plat of Dreamwood Addition, and need to
determine a response. He suggests that the Council meet in Executive Session and
have the Council invoke the Attorney/Client privilege. The Council went into Executive
Session at 7:50 p.m.
The Council meeting reconvened at 8:29 p.m. City Attorney John Dean reported that he
outlined the summons and complaint to the Council and they concurred that the matter
would be further explored at the meeting of July 23rd, where the attorney selected by the
League of Minnesota Cities to defend the City will also be present to discuss litigation
strategies. No decisions or directives have been given by the Council at this time.
5B. PHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZERS
John Dean presented the Council with a handout from the Minnesota Senate. He
indicated that the legislature adopted a law related to the application of phosphorous
fertilizers on turf. The law prohibits the use of phosphorous fertilizers on turf with the
exception of establishment of lawns. He brought this to the City's attention in that the
law doesn't go into affect until 2003-2004 and suggested that the City act before August
1st . The value would be that the City can put the ordinance on the books prior to the
enactment of the law(s) in 2003-2004. Any ordinance would need to be reviewed by the
City Council at its 7/23/02 meeting.
Mayor Meisel would like to use the time to begin educating our local businesses and the
public regarding the phosphorous regulations. She feels that residents need to be
informed.
Julie Weisenhorn, 1733 Bluebird, stated she is a Master Gardener with Hennepin
County, and would be happy to assist in this education endeavor. This item is
especially important for the lakes community and volunteered her services.
-3442-
Mound City Council Minutes - July 9, 2002
Mayor Meisel and members of the City Council, by consensus, agreed to pursue
educational efforts with the public.
6. JIM STROMMEN OF KENNEDY & GRAVEN
ACTION ADOPTIONG AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE
ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION OF THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN
THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE AND
REGULATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS AND APPROVING SUMMARY
PUBLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE.
ACTION ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE GRANTING RELIANT ENERGY
MINNEGASCO A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE,
REPAIR AND MAINTAIN FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE
TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFCTURE AND SALE OF GAS
ENERGY FOR PUBLIC USE AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND
GROUNDS FOR SUCH PURPOSE AND APPROVING SUMMARY
PUBLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE.
Sarah Smith introduced the ROW and gas franchise ordinance to the City Council
and outlined the process undertaken by the City of Mound to bring the document to
this point, including the preparation of earlier drafts as well the input provided by the
various utility companies. Smith commented that Butch McConnell of Frontier
Communications called earlier today and indicated that they are conformable with
the most recent draft of the ordinance and further commented that Xcel Energy may
have remaining issues and it was anticipated that a representative would be
attending this evening's meeting. Mr. Strommen further commented that he believes
that he understands what Xcel's issues are and further commented that in most
cases, outstanding issues can be worked out.
Hanus asked whether the document is the cutting edge and Strommen added that
the document originated from the LMC and from the cities of Minneapolis and St.
Paul. Recent cities that have approved documents include Burnsville and
Shakopee. He further commented that the utilities are fairly familiar with the
elements of this ordinance.
Strommen commented that Mound hasn't contemplated the fee(s) structure as of yet
but is working on it. He further commented that this tends to be an issue that
concerns the utility companies.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to pass the following ordinance and
approve summary publication. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
4
-3443-
Mound City Council Minutes - July 9, 2002
ORDINANCE NO. tl-2002: AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE
ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION OF PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND
TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE AND
REGULATIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY PERMITS;
ADDING SECTION 655 TO THE MOUND CITY CODE.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to pass the following ordinance and
approve summary publication. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 12-2002:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING RELIANT ENERGY
MINNEGASCO, A DIVISION OF RELIANT ENERGY
RESOURCES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS,
A NONEXCLUSlVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT,
OPERATE, REPAIR AND MAINTAIN FACILITIES
AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION,
DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF
GAS ENERGY FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE
AND TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND GROUNDS
OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA, FOR SUCH
PURPOSE; AND PRESCRIBING CERTAIN TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF.
C. ACTION REGARDING REIMBURSEMENT OF ENGINEERING COSTS FOR
TRANSMISSION LINE RELOCATION AND ACTION PROVIDING DIRECTION
REGARDING THE UNDERGROUNDINGN OF TRANSMISSION LINES
RELATED TO DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AND THE PUBLIC SAFETY
FACILITY.
Strommen provided the City Council with an overview regarding the reimbursement
of engineering costs for transmission line relocation associated with the Xcel
substation relocation for the CSAH 15 project. To reach a compromise in order to
advance the project, the City has offered to advance approximately $20,000 to get
things moving. The City Council can opt to attempt to recover these costs and/or
forego the fees. Strommen reminded the Council that Hennepin County has
indicated that they will not pay the fees. Strommen indicated that City staff is looking
for some direction from the City Council how to address this matter.
Mayor Meisel stated that when the original resolution was adopted to approve the
payment of the advance to Excel, it reserved the right to recover further costs.
Hanus commented that potential legal fees could exceed the $18,000 fees paid to
Xcel.
5
-3444-
Mound City Council Minutes - July 9, 2002
Hanus asked if this is a good time to pursue this matter or should the City retain its
future right. Members of the City Council gave Mr. Strommen a directive to see if
anything can be done to recoup these costs.
Strommen explained the 1999 court case for the City of Oakdale which stated that
municipalities, but using its police power, can force private utilities to go
underground.
The question for the City of Mound is that if there is a surcharge for undergrounding
the utilities in the downtown project and for the new Public Safety Facility, should
these charges be borne by the utilities companies. This could be a "test case" for
the Public Utilities Commission. The opportunity also exists that League could
provide legal assistance. He cited the Minneapolis and St. Paul model which
requires undergrounding.
Osmek commented that the downtown and the public safety structure have special
needs which merit undergrounding, however it is unlikely that the entire community
would go underground.
Hanus suggested that we get an estimate on potential costs,etc.
Strommen commented that he would like to discuss the "special facility" matter with
an expert and suggested that he bring an estimate back in a few weeks.
Additionally, the opportunity to involve the League of Minnesota Cities is also
advisable. The directive was given for him to do so and report back to the Council.
7. ACTION ON REQUEST FROM LITTLE LEAGUE TO MODIFY LOST LAKE
GREENWAY PROJECT AS IT RELATES TO THE TRAIL PLAN
Bruce Chamberlain was present to discuss a proposed change to the Greenway Trail in
response to concerns expressed by the Little League about it cutting through their
parking lot and to provide an overview of the present trail alignment which would
remove (4) stalls.
Based on discussions with the Little League, a possible solution is to stop the trail at the
west edge of the parking lot. The Little league has expressed interest in pursuing the
preparation of a master plan which would perhaps find a better position for the trail in
the long run. MnDot is comfortable with the proposed modification and it will not affect
the grant involved.
MOTION by Brown seconded by Osmek to approve the modified plan as presented.
Discussion followed with regard to the availability of the City Hall lot for parking. Meyer
requested that Brown rescind his motion to allow additional discussion with the Little
League to ask them to reconsider in light of the availability of parking at City Hall and
-3445-
Mound City Council Minutes - July 9, 2002
the Balboa property. He feels that it is important to complete the trail as originally
planned. Chamberlain stated the Little League feels that it is very important to have
close, convenient parking.
Meisel commented that the parking at City Hall is always available and we should make
the Little League aware of the City Hall lot.
Hanus indicated that this modification still allows pedestrian access via the parking lot.
Meyer requested that Councilmember Brown rescind his motion to allow an additional
discussion(s) with the Little League to ask them to reconsider in light of the availability
of parking at City Hall and the Balboa property. He really feels it is important to
complete the trail.
Vote on the motion was called at the request of Councilmember Brown. The following
voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted
against: Meyer. Motion carried.
8. ACTION ON NUISANCE ORDINANCE AS IT PERTAINS TO VEHICLES AND
SCREENING
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to refer the nuisance ordinance to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation back to the Council. All voted in favor.
Motion carried. All pertinent background information will be supplied to the Planning
Commission.
9. ACTION ON RESOLUTION DENYING REQUESTS OF BECKER FOR NO-LOSS
DETERMINATION AND EXEMPTION UNDER THE WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
ON FOUR LOTSIN THE CITY OF MOUND AND ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE
ACTIONS OF CITY STAFF
Smith briefly summarized the history and outlined the scope of the proposed resolution.
Smith also commented that the Becker family has submitted an application to rezone
the subject area to R-lA.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-73: RESOLUTION DENYING REQUESTS OF TIMOTHY
BECKER AND DALE AND LORELL BECKER FOR NO-
LOSS DETERMINATION AND EXEMPTION UNDER THE
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACTON FOUR LOTS IN
THE CITY OF MOUND AND ACCEPTING AND
ADOPTING THE ACTIONS OF CITY STAFF.
7
-3446-
Mound City Council Minutes - July 9, 2002
10. ACTION ON REQUEST TO REDUCE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR LANGDON
WOODS SUBDIVISION
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve to reduce the letter of credit by
$108,961.12, for Langdon Woods Subdivision based on the progress of the construction
project to date. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
11. ACTION RESETTING COUNCIL MEETING DUE TO PRIMARY ELECTION
Meyer suggested tabling the meeting date change to its 7~23~02 meeting when the City
Manager is present.
12. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. AMM Fax News
B. LMCD correspondence
C. Article: Mixed Masters
D. Newsletter: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
E. Newsletter: Gillespie Center
F. Article: Municipal Liquor Stores Boost Projects' Funding
G. Public Safety Building update
H. Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative correspondence
I. Letters: Students on phosphorous
J. Minutes: Planning Commission - June 3 & 17
K. City Manager Sweden trip
13. ADJOURN
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 10:05 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
8
-3447-
JULY 23, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
070102SUE $3,262.14
070302SUE $25.00
071002SUE $3,981.36
071702S U E $54,760.32
071802SUE $1,906.02
072302SU E $237,291.65
TOTAL
$301,226.49
-3448-
CITY OF MOUND
*Check Detail Register( )
07/18/02 8:21
July 2002
Check Amt Invoice Comment
'10100 Marquette Bank Mound
Paid Chk# 007656 7/1/2002 BAYSlDE FLORAL
G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow $66.56 070102
Total BAYSIDE FLORAL $66.56
Paid Chk# 007657
FLOWERS RETIREMENT EVENT
7/1/2002 HARRELL, LEONARD
G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow $80.00 070102
Total HARRELL, LEONARD $80.00
Paid Chk# 007658
CAKE RETIREMENT EVENT
7/1/2002 HAWKS, SHIRLEY
G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow $2,815.58 070102
Total HAWKS, SHIRLEY $2,815.58
Paid Chk# 007659
REIMBURSE RETIREMENT EVENT
7/1/2002 WEAR, MICHAEL
G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow $300.00 070102
Total WEAR, MICHAEL $300.00
10100 Marquette Bank Mound $3,262.14
VIDEO RETIREMENT EVENT
FILTER: None
-3449-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/02/02 4:46 PM
Page
Current Period: July 2002
Batch Name 070302SUE User Dollar Amt $25,00
Payments
Refer 70302 EXCELSIOR, CITY OF
Computer Dollar Amt $25.00
Cash Payment E 101-41310-331 Meeting/Travel
invoice 070302
Transaction Date 7/2/2002 .
$0.00 In Balance
7/3/2002
07-17-02 MEETING EXPENSE
$25.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total $25.00
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$25.OO
$25.00
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$25.00
$25.00
-3450-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/09/02 1:09 PM
Page 1
Current Period: July 2002
Batch Name 071002SUE User Dollar Amt $3,981.36
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,981.36
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 71002 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA 7110/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone 06-02 472-0600 $1,035.86
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone 06-02 472-0621 $734.63
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone 06-02 472-0635 $332.82
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone 05-02 472-0635 $332.82
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone 05-02 472-0635 $338.83
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone 06-02 472-3093 $301.38
Invoice 063002
Transaction Date 7/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,076.34
Refer 71002 GRADY, DANIEL 7/10/2002
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $290.92
Invoice 071002
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $290.92
Refer 71002- PETTYCASH 7/10/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH MISCELLANEOUS $108.99
ITEMS
Invoice 071002 PO 17415
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $108.99
Refer 71002 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (FIR
Cash Payment
Invoice 062402
Transaction Date
E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels
7/8/2002
7/10/2002
THRU 06-24-02 GASOLINE CHARGES
$505.11
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $505.11
-3451 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/09/02 1:09 PM
Page 2
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
Fund Summary
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$2,503.22
$505.11
$332.82
$338,83
$301.38
$3,981,36
Pre-Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Compute $3,981.36
Total $3,981.36
-3452-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:32 PM
Page 1
Current Period: July 2002
Batch Name 071702SUE User Dollar Amt $54,760.32
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $54,760.32
Refer 71702 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA
Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone
Invoice 071002
Transaction Date 7/17/2002
$0.00
7/17/2002
07-02 472-0646
Refer 71702 GILLESPIE CENTER 7/17/2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 071002
In Balance
$18.41
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $18.41
HARRELL RETIREMENT CLEANING
$70.00
G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total $70.00
Refer 71702 HARRELL, LEONARD 7/17/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow RETIREMENT GIFT $621.56
Invoice 071702
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $621.56
Refer 71702 HAWKS, SHIRLEY 7/17/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow REIMBURSE HARRELL RETIREMENT EVENT $32.00
PAPER GOODS
Invoice 071702
;'ransaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $32.00
Refer 71702 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 071702
Transaction Date 7/17/2002
Refer 71702 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T
Cash Payment E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment
,i~voice 10589
Cash Payment
invoice 10589
7/17/2002
MAILING LABELS
E 101-41310-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-41600-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-42110-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-42115-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-42400-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-45200-361 General Liability Ins
E 222-42260-361 General Liability Ins
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
7/17/2002
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
GEN LIABILITYL INS
$135.00
Total $135.00
$1,187.45
$368.04
$473.94
$86.80
$2,576.29
$45.15
$473.94
$2,852.32
$190.96
$644.07
$3,447.78
-3453-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:32 PM
Page 2
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750.361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITYL INS
$3,685.62
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITYL INS $2,692.60
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment E 602-49450-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITYL INS $2,692.60
Invoice 10589
Cash Payment E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITYL INS $380.19
Invoice 10589
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $21,797.75
Refer 71702
Cash Payment
Invoice 0000741352
Transaction Date 7/16/2002
Refer 71702 WINNING EDGE, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment
Invoice 75645
Cash Payment
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR 7/23/2002
E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 08-02 WASTEWATER
E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous
G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
$31,869.30
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $31,869.30
7/17/2002
PLAQUE HARRELL RETIREMENT $150.00
PLAQUE HARRELL RETIREMENT
$66.30
Invoice 75645
Transaction Date 7/17/2002
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
455 TIF 1-2
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $216.30
10100 Ma~uette Bank Mound
$9,857.23
$3,447.78
$380.19
$135.00
$2,692.60
$34,561.90
$3,685.62
$54,760.32
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$54,760.32
$54,760.32
-3454-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/18/02 7:59 AM
Page 1
Current Period: July 2002
Batch Name 07-02CRCARD User Dollar Amt $1,906.02
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,906.02
$0.00 In Balance
MARQUETTE BANK MOUND Ck# 95026 7/31/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41500-433 Dues and Subscriptions GFOA $350.00
SUBSCRIPTION/MEMBERSHIP/CERTIFICATE
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract MODEM FOR P/W GOLFER ON PC $17.06
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 101-41910-300 Professional Srvs INET7 INTERNET SERVICE 07-02 $29.95
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 101-41500-433 Dues and Subscriptions AICPA MEMBERSHIP $140.00
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 101-41310-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER $1,185.36
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies NEXTEL ACCESSORIES $24.93
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies NEXTEL ACCESSORIES $24.93
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies NEXTEL ACCESSORIES $24.94
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions AT&TWORLDNET SERVICE $10.95
Invoice 073102
Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous ORIENTAL TRADING EVENT 08-01-02 $97.90
Invoice 073102
Transaction Date 7/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,906.02
Fund Summary
Refer 73102
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$1,845.20
$10.95
$24.93
$24.94
$1,906.02
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$1,906.02
$o.oo
$1,906.02
-3455-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 1
Current Period: July 2002
Batch Name 072302SUE User Dollar Amt $237,291.65
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $237,291.65
Refer 72302 AMCON
Cash Payment E 401.46580-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 2425
Transaction Date 7/3/2002
Refer 72302 ANTHONYS FLORAL
Cash Payment
Invoice 17212
Transaction Date
E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous
7/3/2002
$0.00 In Balance
7/23/2002
06-02 PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
$10,200.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10,200.00
7/23/2002
SANDQUIST FUNERAL $30.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $30.00
Refer 72302 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $153.60
Invoice MB219606
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $130.80
Invoice MB219408
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $70.80
Invoice MB219314
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $159.60
Invoice NO NUMBER
Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $205.20
Invoice MB218705
Cash Payment E 609.49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $89.40
Invoice MB218410
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $809.40
Refer 72302 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms RITTER CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $48.15
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms RAHN CLOTHING ALLOWNACE $28.00
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment E 101-41500-218 Clothing and Uniforms ROBERTS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $24.50
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms NELSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $8.38
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms NELSON CLOTHNG ALLOWANCE $8.38
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms NELSON CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $8.39
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms NORLANDER CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $30.75
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow WIBBON CLOTHING REIMBURSEMENT $30.00
Invoice 070102
Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms HAWKS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $33.00
Invoice 070102
:ash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms DEBORD CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $33.00
070102
Cash Payment E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms SIMONEAU CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $64.65
Invoice 070102
-3456-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 2
Current Period: July 2002
Transaction Date 7/5/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $317.20
Refer 72302 AT&T
Cash Payment
Invoice 062602
Transaction Date
E 101-41310-321 Telephone
7/3/2002
7/23/2002
THRU 06-26-02 CELL PHONE $33.56
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total $33.58
Refer 72302 BABLER'S MUFFLER SHOP
Cash Payment
Invoice 062702
Transaction Date
E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts
7/17/2002
7/23/2002
REPAIR FORD BUCKET $52.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $52.00
Refer 72302 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 24172700
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 24055800
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 24128600
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 24002300
Transaction Date 7/17/2002
7/23/2002
LIQUOR $2,372.10
LIQUOR -$20.00
LIQUOR $4,845.65
LIQUOR -$76.15
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,121.60
,~,efer 72302 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTRO0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
Invoice W164069
Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
Invoice W164070
Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
Invoice W164071
Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
Invoice 2164072
Transaction Date 7/15/2002
7/23/2002
06-12-02 THRU 07-09-02 CENTERVIEW
BEACH
06-12-02 THRU 07-09-02 HIGHLAND PARK
06-12-02 THRU 07-09-02 MOUND BAY PARK
06-12-02 THRU 07-09-02 THREE POINTS
PARK
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
$308.26
$65.24
$434.52
$65.24
$873.26
Refer 72302 BLACKOWIAK AND SON ROLLOFF 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 50YD DONE FOR TV'S
Invoice 10135990
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 72302 BLACKOWIAK AND SON SANITATI 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10136471
Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10136471
Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10136471
Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP #CMR0121
Invoice 10136572
~ash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP ~CMR0308
lnvoice 10136622
Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP #CHPO085
Invoice 10136508
06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP #CMR0120
06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP #CMR0120
06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP #CMR0120
Total
$475.00
$475,00
$31.66
$31.66
$31.67
$67.01
$184.10
$17.76
-3457-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 3
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10136471
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10136298
Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
invoice 10136298
Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos
Invoice 10136209
Transaction Date 7/12/2002
06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP #CHP00153
06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP
06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP
06-02 GARBAGE PICKUP
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$20.39
$138.21
$138.21
$138,20
$798.87
Refer 72302 BRAND NETWORKING 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract COMPUTER SETUPS
Invoice 15442
Transaction Date 7/15/2002
Refer 72302 BROWN, JIM CULTURED SOD FAR
Cash Payment
Invoice 7730
Transaction Date
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
7/16/2002
$4,544.04
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,544.04
7/23/2002
SOD $143.78
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $143.78
Refer 72302 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 3/4 MINUS (CL2) $709.73
Invoice 6149
l i'ransaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $709.73
Refer 72302 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 06-02 CJDN CONNECT CHARGE $630.00
Invoice P07 MN02713002L
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $630.00
Refer 72302 CHADWICK AND MERTZ
Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees
Invoice 070202
Transaction Date 7/9/2002
Refer 72302 CHAMPION AUTO
7/23/2002
06-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair BATTTERY, CABLE ETC
Invoice D152121
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair COUPLER SAFETY PIN
Invoice D152123
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice D152315
Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts
Invoice D152264
Transaction Date 7/12/2002
CARB,CHOKE CLEANER
POWER STEERING CAP
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$5,185.00
Total $5,185.00
$110.15
$4.25
$4.43
$8.50
Total $127.33
Refer 72302 CLARK PRODUCTS, INCORPORA T 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41110-331 Meeting/Travel PAPER CUPS $65.18
Invoice V424523 PO 17453
Transaction Date 7/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $65.18
72302 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, 7/23/2002
3,ash Payment E 101-43100-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-08-02 EE AD $48.44
Invoice 61943
-3458-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 4
Current Period: July 2002
E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-08-02 EE AD $48.44
Cash Payment
Invoice 61943
Cash Payment
Invoice 61943
Cash Payment
Invoice 61943
Transaction Date
E 602-49450-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-08-02 EE AD
E 101-45200-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-08-02 EE AD
$48.44
$48.43
7/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $193.75
Refer 72302 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $357.68
Invoice 61230199
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $357.68
Refer 72302 CONCO, INCORPORATED
7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 08-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $506.99
invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 08-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $454.85
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $961.84
Refer 72302 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 06-02 COPIER MAITENANCE
Invoice 24916
~ ransaction Date 7~3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 72302 CREPEAU DOCKS 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 281-45210-300 Professional Srvs REPAIR PEMBROKE DOCKS
Invoice 070302
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$340.80
Total $340.80
$60.00
Total $60.00
Refer 72302 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 184373
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 183504
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 182834
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$1,410.12
$565.O6
$3,943.75
$5,918.93
Refer 72302 DEBORD, JEANNE M. 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/5/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$2.00
$2.00
Refer 72302 DOBOSZENSKI AND SONS, INCOR
Cash Payment
Invoice 3
Transaction Date
E 455-46384-300 Professional Srvs
7/17/2002
7/23/2002
MOUNDS VISIONS 2ND ADDITION
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$2,938.35
$2,938.35
Refer 72302 DUSTY'S BODY SHOP, INCORPOR 7/23/2002.
'~,ash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair AUTO REPAIR
hvoice 6638
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
10100
Total
$2,202.65
$2,202.65
Refer 72302 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 7/23/2002
-3459-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 5
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $12.90
Invoice 269565
Cash Payment E 609-,49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,015.25
Invoice 269568
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $231.00
Invoice 267548
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $9.80
Invoice 266157
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,065.40
Invoice 266156
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $68.00
Invoice 262560
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10,402.35
Refer 72302 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY, INCORPOR 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 07-01-02THRU 09-30-02 CONTRACT
Invoice S258061102
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$896.00
Total $896.00
Refer 72302 EXTREME BEVERAGE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609.49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 64478
Fransaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
10100
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 75950
Cash Payment
Invoice 75072
Cash Payment
Invoice 75069
Cash Payment
Invoice 75068
Cash Payment
Invoice 75071
Transaction Date
FIRE CONTROL EXTINGUISHER 7/23/2002
E 609-49750-409 Other Equipment Repair SERVICE FIRE EXTINGUISHSERS
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies SERVICE FIRE EXTINGUISHSERS
E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies SERVICE FIRE EXTINGUISHSERS
E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings
E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies
PO 17118
7/12/2002
SERVICE FIRE EXTINGUISHSERS
SERVICE FIRE EXTINGUISHSERS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
Total
$32.00
$32.00
$45.00
$479.90
$197.59
$113.39
$425.25
$1,261.13
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 252399
Cash Payment
Invoice 252399
Cash Payment
Invoice 252399
Cash Payment
Invoice 252399
Cash Payment
Invoice 252399
";ash Payment
252399
;ash Payment
Invoice 266239
G & K SERVICES 7/23/2002
E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 101.43100-230 Shop Materials
E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials
E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials
E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies
06-25-02 UNIFORMS
06-25-02 UNIFORMS
06-25-02 UNIFORMS
06-25-02 MATS
06-25-02 MATS
06-25-02 MATS
07-09-02 MATS
$45.13
$45.13
$45.13
$24.05
$24.05
$24.05
$49.87
-3460-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 6
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 07-09-02 MATS $53.73
Invoice 266237
Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 07-09-02 MATS $83,96
invoice 266238
Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 07-09-02 MATS $21.29
Invoice 266240
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-02-02 UNIFORMS $47.02
invoice 259328
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-02-02 UNIFORMS $47.02
Invoice 259328
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-02-02 UNFORMS $47.03
Invoice 259238
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 07-02-02 MATS $13,06
Invoice 259328
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 07-02-02 MATS $13.06
Invoice 259328
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 07-02-02 MATS $13.06
Invoice 259328
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-09-02 UNIFORMS $30.42
Invoice 266236
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-09-02 UNIFORMS $30.42
Invoice 266236
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-09-02 UNIFORMS $30.42
Invoice 266236
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 07-09-02 MATS $16.70
Invoice 266236
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 07-09-02 MATS $16.70
Invoice 266236
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 07-09-02 MATS $16.70
Invoice 266236
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $738.00
Refer 72302 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 06-02 WATER $39.60
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 06-02 WATER $39.60
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 06-02 WATER $70,92
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 06-02 WATER $11.63
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 06-02 WATER $11.63
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 06-02 WATER $11.64
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous 06-02 WATER $73.84
Invoice 063002
'~ansaction Date 7/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $258,86
Refer 72302 GME CONSULTANTS 7/23/2002
-3461 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 7
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 06-02 WESTEDGE WATER MAIN PROJECT $1,765.90
Invoice 14213
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,765.90
Refer 72302 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICER 7/23/2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date
E 101-41500-433 Dues and Subscriptions
7/3/2002
2002 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$200.00
Total $200.00
Refer 72302 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY
Cash Payment
Invoice 568989
Cash Payment
Invoice 568317
Cash Payment
Invoice 564183
Cash Payment
Invoice 568316
Transaction Date
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
7/17/2002
7/23/2002
LIQUOR $4,374.38
WINE $1,054.94
WINE $1,556.41
WINE $89.70
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,075.43
Refer 72302 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals
Invoice DM 76169
I ,'ransaction Date 7/16/2002
Refer 72302 HAWKS, SHIRLEY
Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/5/2002
7/23/2002
3 CONTAINERS
$15.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15.00
7/23/2002
REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $2.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2.00
Refer 72302 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMA TIO 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 06-02 INTERNET SERVICE
Invoice 220670136
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 72302 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 05-02 BOOKING FEE
Invoice 061402
Transaction Date 7/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$43.87
Total $43.87
$744.72
Total $744.72
Refer 72302 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 05-02 ROOM AND BOARD
Invoice 000575
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 72302 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs LABELS FOR SAFETY BLDG
Invoice 2002-48
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$4,084.50
Total $4,084.50
$72,50
Total $72.50
Refer 72302 HENTGES, S.M. AND SONS, INCO
~ash Payment
2
Transaction Date
E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
7/17/20 O2
7/23/2002
WESTEDGE WATERMAIN
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$12,118.94
Total $12,118.94
-3462-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 8
Current Period: July 2002
Invoice 070902-A
Cash Payment E
Invoice 070902-B
Cash Payment G
Invoice 070902-Cl
Cash Payment G
Invoice 070902-C2
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 070902-C3
Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 070902-D1
Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 070902-D2
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 070903-D3
Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development
invoice 070902-E1
Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 070902-E2
~ash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 070902-E3
Transaction Date 7/17/2002
Refer 72302 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 07-02 LOST LAKE GREENWAY CD'S
Project 00-48
101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 07-02 MISC PLANNING CASES
Project 02-01
101-22899 Pastuck Natural Homes #02- 07-02 PASTUCK MINOR SUB-DIVISION
Project 02-05
101-22896 Lake Mtka Trail Sub-div #02- 07-02 SW TRAILS PLAT
Project 02-05
07-02 3030 ISLANDVIEW DECK VARIANCE
Project 02-05
07-02 GREENWAY
Project 02-24
07-02 LIFT STATION
Project 02-24
07-02 CTY RD 15 RELOCATION
Project 02-24
07-02 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT
Project 02-73
07-02 POST OFFICE DEVELOPMENT
Project 02-73
07-02 TIF RELATED WORK
Project 02-73
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 72302 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/15/2002
$1,248.00
$1,725.00
$112.50
$225.00
$337.50
$645.82
$1,291.64
$645.83
$3~5.00
$115.00
$345.00
$7,036.29
7/23/2002
08-02 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL SPACE $4,342.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,342.00
Refer 72302 lOS CAPITAL 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying 07-09-02 THRU 10-08-02 CANON
MAINTENANCE
Invoice 55439146
Transaction Date 7/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$99.75
Total $99.75
Refer 72302 IRRIGATION ENGINEERING, INC.
Cash Payment E 455-46384-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 7829
Transaction Date 7/15/2002
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 10696
Cash Payment
Invoice 10760
Cash Payment
Invoice 10889
Cash Payment
nvoice 10664
Cash Payment
Invoice 10690
ISLAND PARK SKELL Y 712312002.
E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPLACE LEAKING O RINGS
E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MOUNT/ALIGN TIRES
E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR ACCEL PUMP
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery FLAT TIRE REPAIR
7/23/2002
VILLAGE AT COOKS BAY $4,100.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,100.00
$436.98
$83.95
$55.16
$27.99
$15.00
-3463-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 9
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WIRE SET, ETC
Invoice 10722
Cash Payment
Invoice 10746
Cash Payment
Invoice 10815
Transaction Date 7/9/2002
Refer 72302 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 514514-B
Cash Payment G 101-22808 Adopt A Green Space
Invoice 257637-B
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 512457-B
Transaction Date 7/12/2002
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE WORK
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR VACUUM LEAK
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
7/23/2002
$252.98
$404.75
$63.00
Total $1,339,81
FOAM BOARDS, LABELS $25.52
FLOWERS $2.34
FRAME $12.76
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $40.62
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
invoice 197531
Cash Payment
Invoice 197530
:~ash Payment
197075
Cash Payment
Invoice 1328809
Cash Payment
Invoice 1428808
Cash Payment
Invoice 1428807
Cash Payment
Invoice 1423179
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
7/23/2002
CREDIT-WINE
CREDIT-WINE
CREDIT-WINE
WINE
WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
WINE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 1429035
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,655,80
Refer 72302 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS 7/23/2002
-$3.46
-$195.90
-$4.83
$71.97
$1,024.90
$3,510.57
$148.80
$103.75
Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 08-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $267.02
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 455.46381-611 Bond Interest 08-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $402.09
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $669.11
Refer 72302 LAKE MINNETONKA CHAMBER CO 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41310-331 Meeting/Travel CHAMBER/ROTARY MEETING $33.00
Invoice 0003480
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $33.00
Refer 72302 LAKE MINNETONKA CONVERSA TI 7/23/2002
~ash Payment E 101.41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 3RD QTR LEVY PAYMENT
062802
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$4,697.94
Total $4,697.94
-3464-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 10
Current Period: July 2002
Refer 72302 LAKER NEWSPAPER 7/23/2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 223
Cash Payment
Invoice 234
Cash Payment
Invoice 235
Cash Payment
Invoice 226
Cash Payment
Invoice 250
Transaction Date 7/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 72302 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
Invoice 9435526
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
Invoice 9435526
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
Invoice 9435526
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
E 101-41500-351 Legal Notices Publishing 06-29-02 FINANCIAL REPORT
E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing 07-06-02 ORDINACE #11-2002
E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing 07-06-02 ORDINANCE 12-2002
G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 06-29-02 HARDCOVER ISSUE
E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 07-13-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
Total
Total
$557.20
$69.65
$51,74
$40.00
$39.OO
$757.59
$76.29
$76.29
$76.28
$228.86
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
Cash Payment
~nvoice 10499
Cash Payment
Invoice 10499
LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T
E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-41310-361 General Liability ins
E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-41600-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-42110-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-42115-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-42400-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins
E 101-45200-361 General Liability Ins
E 222-42260-361 General Liability Ins
E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins
E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins
E 602-49450-361 General Liability Ins
7/23/2002
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY
$1,320.27
$409.21
$526.95
$96.50
$2,864.44
$50.19
$526.95
$3,171.34
$212.32
$716.10
$3,633.40
$4,097.84
$2,993.76
$2,993.76
-3465-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:00 PM
Page 11
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALL GEN LIABILITY $422.72
Invoice 10499
Transaction
Date
7/5/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $24,235.75
Refer 72302 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR WATER PUMP $70.66
Invoice 035773
Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts MICRONIC FILTER $34.02
Invoice 035924
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair FUEL PUMP $27.05
Invoice 036491
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair SCREWS $2.94
Invoice 036671
Transaction Date 7/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $134.67
Refer 72302 LOWELL'S AUTOMOTIVE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE PADS $209.92
Invoice 5-343814 PO 840
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $209.92
Refer 72302 MADDEN, FRANKANDASSOCIAT 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs THRU 06-30-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $319.90
Invoice 070102
ti'ransaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $319.90
Refer 72302 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $97.50
Invoice 432435
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,084.25
Invoice 432434
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale LIQUOR $2,699.60
Invoice 435232
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,881.35
Refer 72302 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 06-17-02 DELIVERY CHARGES $19.20
Invoice 11152
Cash Payment E 609-49750~265 Freight 06-20-02 DELIVERY CHAREGS $125.60
Invoice 11176
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 06-24-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $34.40
Invoice 11188
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 06-27-02 DELIVERY CHAGE $181.60
Invoice 11210
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $360.60
Refer 72302 MCCOMBSFRANKROOSASSOCi .7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 03-02 2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
invoice 39556 Project 13677
Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 03-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT
e nvoice 39554 Project 13646
~ansaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer
$2,962.50
$4,645.80
$7,608.30
72302 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVlR 7/23/2002
-3466-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 12
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 06-02 SAC CHARGES $7,128.00
invoice 063002
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,128.00
Refer 72302 MINNCOMM PAGING 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 07-02 PAGERS $112.55
Invoice 073102
Transaction Date 7/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
$112.55
Refer
72302 MINNESOTA DEPT ECONOMIC SE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-140 Unemployment Comp
Invoice 2ND QTR
Cash Payment E 222-42260-140 Unemployment Comp
Invoice 2ND QTR
Cash Payment E 101-42110-140 Unemployment Comp
Invoice 2ND QTR
Cash Payment E 101-41310-140 Unemployment Comp
Invoice 2ND QTR
Transaction Date 7/15/2002
2ND QTR 2002 JAYKO, BRAD
2ND QTR 2002 POIKONEN, D.
2ND QTR 2002 BUETOW, MICHAEL
2ND QTR 2002 CHARON, K.
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$1,056.00
$6.37
$132.49
$14.66
$1,209.52
Refer 72302 MINNESOTA DEPT OF FINANCE
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
Invoice 645030609A
~ash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
Invoice 645030622A
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
Invoice 645025735A
Transaction Date 7/3/2002
7/23/2002
SW TRAILS 10-05-01 THRU 06-01-02
SW TRAILS 10-05-01 THRU 06-01-02
SW TRAILS 10-05-01 THRU 06-01-02
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$2,575.60
$10,272.95
$767.38
$13,615.93
Refer 72302 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice ViC 16010
Transaction Date 7/9/2002
7/23/2002
MAXWELL PROPERTY 5341 SHORELINE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$120.00
$120.00
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 63768
Cash Payment
Invoice 63603
Cash Payment
Invoice 63286
Cash Payment
Invoice 62972
Cash Payment
invoice 62839
Cash Payment
Invoice 62360
Cash Payment
Invoice 62237
;ash Payment
~lnvoice 63768
Cash Payment
Invoice 62039
MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS 7/23/2002
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
06-28-02 BLACKTOP
06-27-02 BLACKTOP
06-20-02 BLACKTOP
06-18-02 BLACKTOP
06-14-02 BLACKTOP
06-12-02 CONCRETE
06-11-02 BLACKTOP
06-10-02 CONCRETE
06-10-02 BLACKTOP
$70.11
$342.40
$102.64
$103.63
$217.16
$69.25
$68.41
$68.33
$273.30
-3467-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 13
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 06-06-02 BLACKTOP $521.56
Invoice 61891
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,836.79
Refer 72302
NELSON, JOYCE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41310-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $3.28
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $3.28
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $3,29
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/5/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $9.65
Refer 72302 NORLANDER, JILL 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $4.25
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/5/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4.25
Refer 72302 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPP 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply METER COUPLING $61
invoice 3121944
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $61.86
~efer 72302 NRG PROCESSING SOLLUTIONS L 7/23/2002
Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 06-02 SERVICES $77.04
Invoice 18278
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $77.04
Refer 72302 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 06-02 LOCATES $185,23
Invoice 2060534
Cash Payment E 602.49450-395 Gopher One-Call 06-02 LOCATES $185,22
Invoice 2060534
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $370.45
Refer 72302 PALM, MICHAEL 7/23/2002
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $261.25
Refer 72302 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 33871898
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
invoice 34775025
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
$148,48
$7,40
10100 Total $155.88
Refer 72302 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC 7/23/2002
Oash Payment
852121
sh Payment
invoice 852120
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MiX
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$426.00
$266.00
-3468-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 14
Current Period: July 2002
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $692.00
Refer 72302
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $998.76
Invoice 63835
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $33.15
Invoice 63224
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $1,037.89
Invoice 63210
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $682.36
Invoice 64471
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,752.16
Refer 72302 PRESS NEWS PUBLICATIONS 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-10-02 EE AD
Invoice 02524517-003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-10-02 EE AD
Invoice 02524517-003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-10-02 EE AD
Invoice 02524517-003
Cash Payment E 101-45200-351 Legal Notices Publishing THRU 06-10-02 EE AD
Invoice 02524517-003
;'ransaction Date 7/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$55.50
$55.50
$55,50
$55.5O
Total $222.00
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 070602
Cash Payment
Invoice 070602
Cash Payment
Invoice 070602
Transaction Date
PROTECTION ONE 7/23/2002
E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-02 THRU 10-15-02 MONITORING
E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-02 THRU 10-15-02 MONITORING
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-02 THRU 10-15-02 MONITORING
7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$47,60
$47.60
$47,60
Total $142.80
Refer 72302 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT COM 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-409 Other Equipment Repair CALIBRATION OF RADAR UNITS
Invoice 8066
Transaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 72302 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 144818-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 144595-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 144594-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 144004-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 141274-00
ransaction Date 7/17/2002
$285.00
10100 Total $285.00
7/23/2002
LIQUOR $151.90
LIQUOR $123.84
LIQUOR $3,497.80
CREDIT-LIQUOR -$20.01
CREDIT-LIQUOR -$13.92
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,739.61
Refer 72302 RAHN, JODI L.
7/23/2002
-3469-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 15
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-41310-218 Clothin9 and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $7.00
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/5/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7.00
Refer 72302 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date
E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies
7/15/2002
7/23/2002
09-16-02 SEMINAR $50.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.00
Refer 72302 RELIANT ENERGY
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment
invoice 072302
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
'~ash Payment
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date
E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities
E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities
E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities
E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities
E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities
E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities
E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
7/12/2002
7/23/2002
05-17-02 THRU 06-18-02 #543-000-053-000
05-17-02 THRU 06-18-02 #543-001-095-800
05-17-02 THRU 06-18-02 #543-001-833-500
05-17-02 THRU 06-18-02 #543-001-852-100
05-17-02 THRU 06-18-02 #543-001-853-000
05-17-02 THRU 06-18-02 #543-001-972-603
05-17-02 TH RU 06-18-02 #543-001-972-603
05-17-02 THRU 06-18-02 #543-001-972-603
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
$40.24
$57.50
$15.98
$62.74
$176.30
$25.59
$14.54
$18.02
$412.91
Refer 72302 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO
Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels
Invoice R 06021068
Transaction Date 7/8/2002
7/23/2002
AIR AND OXYGEN
$22.40
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $22.40
Refer 72302 ROBERTS, COLLETTE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41500-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBUSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $10.50
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/5/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10.50
Refer 72302 SCHARBER AND SONS 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA MOWER WITH BAGGER $692.25
Invoice 672750 PO 17252
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair FUEL PUMP $137.92
Invoice 02 2027296
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair RELAY AND STUD $25.86
Invoice 02 2027421
Transaction Date 7/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $856.03
Refer 72302 SOS PRINTING 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-350 Printing ENVELOPES $122.85
Invoice 63948
Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $122.85
Refer 72302 SPORTING BREED KENNELS 7/23/2002
-3470-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 16
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees 08-02 DOG KENNEL FEE $325.00
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $325.00
Refer 72302 STREICHER'S 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR GRILL LIGHTS $532.90
Invoice 302697.1
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPLACE SPOTLIGHT HANDLE $44.12
Invoice 304456.1
Transaction Date 7/9/2002
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $300.00
Refer 72302 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $577.02
THOMPSON, MATTHEW 7/23/2002
R 281-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND STAIRWAY FEE $50.00
REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00
$5,861.10
Invoice 267990
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $274.75
Invoice 267989
,;ash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $221.00
Invoice 227890
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,265.90
Invoice 267195
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $51.40
Invoice 267194
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $214.00
Invoice 227406
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $274.45
Invoice 266399
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $9,093.10
Invoice 266400
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $22,255.70
Refer 72302 THYSSEN-KRUPP ELEVATOR COR 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-02 ELEVATOR SERVICE $158.60
Invoice 347417
Transaction Date 7/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 72302 TMB CONSULTING 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract TONER FOR PRINTERS $345.00
Invoice 05-247
Transaction Date 7/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $345.00
$158.60
Refer 72302
TRI-STATE PUMP AND CONTOL, I 7/23/2002.
Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract REPAIR RACO AUTO DIALER $726.19
Invoice 21227
ransaction Date 7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $726.19
Refer 72302 TRUE VALUE, MOUND 7/23/2002
-3471 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 17
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-ZZ0 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 06300z
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment
!nvoice 063002
Payment
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 72302 TRUE VALUE, NA VAARRE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Pads BALL VALVE
Invoice 104156
Transaction Date 7/16/2002
MI~CFLLANEOU$ 3UPPLIE$
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
E 602.49450-221 Equipment Pads
E 101.43100-220 RepaiflMaint Supply
E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies
E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
E 602.49450-210 Operating Supplies
E 601-49400-322 Postage
E 101-41920-200 Office Supplies
E 281-45210-210 Operating Supplies
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
PLANTER BOXES
$35.49
Marquette Bank Mou
$4.22
$8.51
$17.64
$105.92
$105.92
$105.95
$44.39
$15.96
$47.40
$219.70
$913.41
10100 Total $1,624.51
$26.61
10100 Total $26.61
Refer 72302 TUSHIE MONTGOMERYARCHITE 7/23/2002
Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings 06-02 LIQUOR STORE PROJECT
Invoice 11
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 72302
Cash Payment
Invoice 146567
Cash Payment
Invoice 146567
Cash Payment
Invoice 146567
Transaction Date
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP .7/23/2002
E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies KEYLESS ENTRY
E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies KEYLESS ENTRY
E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies KEYLESS ENTRY
7/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$7,161.74
Total $7,161.74
$35.50
$35.50
$35.50
Total $106,50
Refer 72302 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349050-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
i~voice 349050-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349050-0
7/23/2002
TONER CARTRIDGE
TONER CARTRIDGE
TONER CARTRIDGE
$46.12
$46.12
$46.12
-3472-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 18
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies BINDERS $38.19
Invoice 349050-0
Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies BINDERS $14.70
invoice 349742-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MARKERS $24.50
Invoice 349558-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.52
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.52
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.52
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1,52
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.52
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.51
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.51
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.76
,Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.76
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies BINDERS $22.02
Invoice 349441-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.19
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.19
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.19
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.19
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.19
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.40
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.40
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.58
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.58
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies CUSTOM DATER $15.98
Invoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies CUSTOM DATER $15.98
~hvoice 349064-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies CUSTOM DATER $15.98
Invoice 349064-0
-3473-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 19
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349779-0 PO 17454
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 349101-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
tnvoice 349776-0
Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 249983-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350246-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350426-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 350730-0
ransaction Date ~7/3/200._ 2
efer 72302 UNITED PROPERTIES
COPIER PAPER $35.94
COPIER PAPER
COPIER PAPER
COPIER PAPER
COPIER PAPER
COPIER PAPER
COPIER PAPER
COPIER PAPER
COPIER PAPER
DISK HOLDER, ETC
TONER AND BINDERS
PRINTER RIBBON
DISKS
DISK
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total
$35.94
$35.94
$35.94
$35.94
$11.98
$11.98
$17.97
$18.00
$55.38
$139.79
$23.79
$5.82
$12.72
$20.95
$20,95
$2O,95
$2O.95
$20.95
$6.98
$6.98
$10.49
$10.49
$960.58
7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-02 BALBOA PARKING
Invoice 072302
$31.95
-3474-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 20
Current Period: July 2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.85
Refer 72302 US FILTER 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply CLAMPS, ETC $982.19
Invoice 8507654 PO 17324
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $982.19
Refer 72~O~RELESS ~ ' ..... ......
7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone 07-02 612-296-9058 FINANCE $8.39
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone 07-02 612-590-4351 P/W $11.55
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone 07-02 612-590-4351 P/VV $11.55
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone 07-02 612-590-4351 P/W $11.54
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 07-02 612-723-7560 FIRE $0.98
Invoice 072302
;ash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 07-02 612-751-3572 ENGINE #18 $1.62
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 07-02 612-751-3573 FIRE $1.30
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 07-02 612-875-4502 RESCUE TRUCE $8.39
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone 07-02 612-750-2666 CHIEF $22.28
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 72302 WATERTOWN PARTS CENTER
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 322641
Transaction Date 7/16/2002
Total $77.60
7/23/2002.
20 LBS $15.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15.00
Refer 72302 WEIST, KATHY 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-322 Postage REIMBURSE UPS FREIGHT $7.59
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7.59
Refer 72302 WESTONKA MECHANICAL 7/'23/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR WATER $190.70
Invoice 28986
Transaction Date 7/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $190.70
Refer 72302 WIBBEN, KRISTI
7/23/20O2
Cash Payment E 101-42400-212 Motor Fuels REIMBURSE GASOLINE CHARGE $9.50
Invoice 072302
iash Payment E 101-41310-212 Motor Fuels REIMBURSE GASOLINE CHARGE $9,50
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $19.00
-3475-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 21
Current Period: July 2002
Refer 72302 WlDMER, INCORPORATED 7/23/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 06-13-02 REPLACED STAND PIPE $797.50
Invoice 5409
Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 06-10-02 REPAIRED WATER SERVICE $362.50
Invoice 5406
Transaction Date 7~9~2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,160.00
Refer 72302 XCEL ENERGY
712312002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 06-02 #0542-505-000-274 $5,033.89
Invoice 063002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #2245-301-939 $1,370.27
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities 06-02 #0466-607-223 $21.99
invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #1914-601-425 $541.70
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities 06-02 #0217-606-329 $3,690.06
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #2184-407-147 $739.26
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #0047-005-229 $189.80
Invoice 072302
i;ash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #0864-508-832 $139.70
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #0864-508-832 $139.70
invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 602.49450-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #0864-508-832 $139.70
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 602.49450-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #0018-802-634 $1,986.39
Invoice 072302
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 06-02 #0009-604-835 $350.57
Invoice 072302
Transaction Date 7/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $14,343.03
-3476-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
07/17/02 3:06 PM
Page 22
Current Period: July 2002
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
455 TiF 1-2
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$72,660.95
$8,284.28
$1,091.37
$13,325.40
$10,420.95
$23,582.12
$15,822.51
$88,666.57
$475.00
$2,962.50
$237,291.65
Pre-Wdtten Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$237,291.65
$237,291.65
-3477-
Engineering · Planning · Surveying
July 18, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Improvement Project 2002
Mound Visions 2nd Addition Partial Payment
MFRA #13646
Dear Kandis:
Enclosed is Doboszenski & Sons' Payment Request No. 3 for work completed through June 30, 2002
on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $2,938.35.
We have reviewed this Payment Request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above
amount to the Contractor.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Mlq~A
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:pry
cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director
Enclosure
s Amain:Wlou 13646\CorrespondenceXhanson7-18
-3478-
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com
ITl
Z
'"'1
ITl
C::
r'n
omm> O
m z
0 0 ~
Z ~
~ Z
O
Z
--I
"0
~J
m
ITl
--{
::~mz
9
0
0
;Z
o
'13
m
Z
-.{
133
m
Z
-3479-
..... · ~, ~ ~ <<<<<g
-0
bbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
- pp~ppp~ppppp~pppp
zr
bbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
~o
~ ~ O0
b bbbbbbbbbbbbbb b bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
~ ppppppppppppp~ PPPPPPPP~PPPPPPPP
o
p~pppppppppppp
oooooooooooooo
0
~ ~C~
· . f~oo
0
~ ~<~
>
m
D
m
m
m
-3480-
~.o
oooo bb oooooo ~bbbbbbbbb -
~ ~m C
ooo~ ~o ~bbbbb ..........
ooo~ ~o oooooo
o
o ~ o oooooo o
0
~ ~ ~0
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~? ~ ~ .........
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooooooooo~
~ ~ 888~ o 8
o o 888888 o oooooooooo
0
Z,
oooo bb bbbbbb ~bbbbbbbbb
~°~_ oo o~ oo o~ o~ oob° o~ o° 888888 ~ bbbbbbbb bb
>~ ~
m
m
m
-3481 -
0
"r
·
0
0
0
m
Z
ITl
7
m
ITl
rn
-3482-
Engineering · Planning · Surveying
July 18, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
West Edge Boulevard
Watermain Improvements Partial Payment
MFRA #07953
Dear Kandis:
Enclosed is S.M. Hentges & Sons' Payment Request No. 2 for work completed through July 15,
2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $12,118.94. Also included with
the Payment Request is Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $3,100 for additional work as
described in the change order.
We have reviewed the Payment Request and Change Order, find them in order, and recommend
approval and payment in the above amount to the Contractor.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
MFRA
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:pry
cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director
Enclosure
s:h-nain:Wlou07953\Correspondence~hanson7 - 18
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mail: mfra@mfra, com
-3483-
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
. City of Mound
West Edge Boulevard
Watermain Improvements
MFRA #07953
15" HDPE
Geotextile Fabric TYPe V
Sub-Cut Material
40 LF @ $14.00/LF
700 SY @ $1.20/SY
170 CY @ $10.00/CY
TOTAL TH/S CHANGE ORDER
ADD
$ 560.00
$ 840.00
$ 1,700.00
$ 3,100.00
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
CHANGE ORDER NO. I
$ 76,921.70
$ 3,100.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
$ 80,021.70
APPROVED:
CITY OF MOUND
BY:
DATE:
ACCEPTED:
S. M. HENTGES
BY:
DATE:
RECOMMENDED:
s Amain:kmou7953kspecs\chgordemo 1
-3484-
~Z
-3485-
~ ~0 ~m
~'m~
o~oo~ooooooo
~ ~ o~oo~oooooooo
888 ~ $~888888888888
898 g 8~8888885~8888
-3486-
"8=O8o
r
O~ --r
~ ~
.
m
'~1
I
m
m
.-i
ITl
-3487-
5341 Ma3~vood Road
Mound, MN 55364
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: July 17, 2002
SUBJECT: Variance(s) Request - New Single Family Dwelling
OWNER/APPLICANT: Bill Baker
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-23
LOCATION: 4948 Wilshire Boulevard
ZONING: R-1 Residential District
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
SUMMARY
At its July 15, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance(s) request from Bill
Baker to allow construction of a new single-family dwelling at 4948 Wilshire Boulevard. The
requested variances are outlined as follows:
Proposed Reqnired Variance
Front (S) 10 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft.
Lakeside (N) 36 ft. 50 ft. 14 ft.
Lot Area 6,010 sf 10,000 sf 3,990 sf
PROJECT DETAILS
The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure and construct a new 2-~A story
residential dwelling with a building footprint of approximately 1225 SF. Total square footage for
the new house is approximately 4025 SF. The structure would be accessed from and would front
Wilshire Boulevard / CSAH 125. The new house includes a lower level garage on the west side
and also includes a lakeside deck on the north side with views of Seton Channel. Members of the
City Council are advised that copies of the new and/or modified building elevation(s) and floor
plans are included in Planning Report No. 02-23 which has been included as an attachment.
-3488-
OVERVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City staff provided an overview of the project including the modifications to site and building
plans since review of the "original" application by the Planning Commission on June 3''~ that was
subsequently recommended for denial. Since that time, the number of variances for the proposed
project has been reduced from six (6) to three (3) and the building footprint has been downsized
from 2000 SF to 1225 SF. Members of the Planning Commission expressed their support for the
proposed project and commented that the subject site has a number of existing non-conforming
conditions including lot size and setback issues that will be improved and that the encroachments
in the CSAH 125 right-of-way and the neighboring property will be removed. Details regarding
the Planning Commission's review of the application are included the July 15, 2002 Planning
Commission meeting minute excerpts which have been included as a separate attachment.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the
variance request(s) for the property located at 4948 Wilshire Boulevard subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved fees associated with the
variance request.
2. All non-structural elements (landscaping, retaining wall, etc.) encroachments shall be
removed from the Wilshire Boulevard / County Road 125 right-of-way.
3. Hardcover for the subject site shall not exceed (40) percent.
4. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer
prior to issuance of the building permit.
5. The applicant shall be responsible for all permitting issues including but not limited to any
and all permits required from the MC WD.
6. All comments from the City Engineer including the placement of fill.
7. The lowest floor of the proposed new structure shall meet the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation (RFPE) of 933.
8. The storage shed located in the northeast corner of the property shall be relocated to a
conforming location or shall be removed.
In the event the structure is damaged more than (50) percent of its fair market value due
to fire or other natural disaster, it shall be reconstructed according to the current
requirements of the zoning ordinance.
A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included as an
attachment.
-3489-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 02-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A LOT SIZE VARIANCE, FRONT SETBACK
VARIANCE AND A HARDCOVER VARIANCE iFOR A NEW HOUSE TO BE
CONSTRUCTED AT 4948 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
P & Z CASE # 02-23
PID # 24-117-24-14-0048
WHEREAS, the applicant, Bill Baker, has requested the £ollowing variances to
allow construction ora new single-family dwelling at 4948 Wilshire Boulevard:
Pro posed iReq u ired Varia n ce
Front (S) 10 fl. 30 ft. 20 ft.
Lakeside (N) 36 fi. 50 fi. 14 ft.
Lot Area 6,0'I 0 sf 10,000 sf 3,990 sf
and;
WHEREAS, tile subject property includes an existing 2-story house which fronts
Wilshire Boulevard which is to be demolished; and
WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to construct a new 2 '/2 story residential
dwelling with a building Footprint of' 1225 SF; and
WHEREAS, the existing house and lot are deemed to be non-conforming due
to a deficient front setback along Wilshire Boulevard, deficient lot size and deficient
lakeshore setback; and
WHEREAS, the proposed construction project will rernove the encroachments in
the CSAH 125 right-of-way and on tile adjacent property to the west; and
-3490-
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a R-1 zoning district which
requires a minimum front yard setback of thirty (30) feet, side yard setbacks of six (6)
feet and lakeshore setback of(50) feet for existing lots of record: and
WHEREAS, the proposed project will not increase the number variances on the
subject site; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is irregularly shaped and is bordered on two
sides by Wilshire Boulevard to the south and Seton Channel to the north; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
recommended approval of the variance as recommended by Staff subject to
conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota as Follows:
The City does hereby grant tile variance(s) as requested with the following
conditions:
The applicant shall be responsible t-bt payment of all involved fees
associated with the variance request.
b. All non-structural elements (landscaping, retaining wall, etc.)
encroachments shall be removed from the Wilshire Boulevard /
County Road 125 right-of-way.
Hardcover roi' the subject site shall not exceed (40) percent.
Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of the building permit.
The applicant shall be responsible tbr all permitting issues including
but not limited to any and all permits required from the MCWD.
All comments fi'om the City Engineer including the placement of fill.
Tile lowest floor of the proposed new structure shall meet the
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE)of933.
In the event the structure is damaged more than (50) percent of its fair
market value due to fire or other natural disaster, it shall be
reconstructed according to the current requirements of the zoning
ordinance.
-3491 -
2. This variance(s) is approved for the following legally described property
included on Exhibit A.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted on July 23, 2002
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-3492-
Excerpts from
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 15, 2002
BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE #02-23 Variance for New House Construction
Bill Baker
4948 Wilshire Boulevard
The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure and construct a new 2 ¥2 story
residential dwelling with a building footprint of approximately 1225 SF. Total square footage for
the new house is approximately 4025 SF. The structure would be accessed from and would front
Wilshire Boulevard / CSAH 125. The new house includes a lower level garage on the west side
and also includes lakeside deck on the north side with views of Seton Channel.
A similar land use application for the subject property was reviewed at the June 3, 2002 meeting
and recommended for denial following a 5 to 2 vote. The application was subsequently
withdrawn by the applicant prior to formal action by the City Council.
The applicant has modified the proposed plans to reduce the size of the house and has also
eliminated the need for variances on the west and east sides respectively. Additionally, the
proposed lakeshore setback has been increased from 29 to 36 feet and the pilings for the
proposed project has been reduced from 6 to 3.
Variances requested are:
Proposed Required Variance
Front (south) 10 ii 30 it 20 fi
Lakeside (north) 36 ft 50 ft 14 ft
Lot Area 6,010 sf 10,000 sf 3,990 sf
Discussion
Mueller inquired and Smith confirmed that these are the only variances required.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Mueller, to approve staff recommendation.
MOTION carded unanimously.
Weiland requested that the shed be removed away after construction is complete.
-3493-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: July 8, 2002
SUBJECT: Variance(s) Request - New Single Family Dwelling
OWNER/APPLICANT: Bill Baker
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-23
LOCATION: 4948 Wilshire Boulevard
ZONING: R-1 Residential District .
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND
The applicant has submitted a new variance(s) request to allow construction of a single-family
dwelling at 4948 Wilshire Boulevard. The requested variances are outlined as follows:
Proposed Required Variance
Front (S) 10 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft.
Lakeside (N) 36 fl. 50 ft. 14 fl.
Lot Area 6,010 sf 10,000 sf 3,990 sf
PROJECT DETAILS
The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structure and construct a new 2-lA story
residential dwelling with a building footprint of approximately 1225 SF. Total square footage for
the new house is approximately 4025 SF. The structure would be accessed from and would front
Wilshire Boulevard / CSAH 125. The new house includes a lower level garage on the west side
and also includes a lakeside deck on the north side with views of Seton Channel. Members of the
Planning Commission are advised that copies of the new and/or modified building elevation(s) and
floor plans have been provided as attachments.
PROJECT HISTORY
As the Planning Commission is aware, a similar land use application for the subject property was
reviewed at the June 3, 2002 meeting and recommended for denial following a 5 to 2 vote. The
application was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant prior to formal action by the City
Council in order to respond to the comments from the Planning Commission.
-3494-
The applicant has modified the proposed plan(s) to reduce the size of the house and has also
eliminated the need for variances on the west and east sides respectively. Additionally, the
proposed lakeshore setback has been increased from (29) to (36) feet and the pilings for the
carport have been eliminated. Therefore, the number of variances needed to accommodate the
proposed project has been reduced from six (6) to three (3). Details regarding the previous
application are contained in Planning Report No. 02-13 and the June 3, 2002 Planning
Commission meeting minutes excerpts.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Floodplain. Portions of the subject property are located within the 100-year floodplain. It
appears that the lowest floor of the existing dwelling is at 935.1 feet which exceeds the minimum
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) of 933.
Encroachments. There are several non-structural encroachments in the county road right-of-way
including several landscaping elements and portions of the existing steps. The northwest corner
of the house also encroaches over the western property line.
Non-Conforming Issues. The subject property includes an existing single-family home with a 1-
stall tuck under garage that is located on the west side of the house. There are several non-
conforming conditions associated with the property including deficient front, side and lakeside
setbacks as well as insufficient lot size. Additionally, there is also a small storage shed in the
northeastern corner of the property that is located in a non-conforming location.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A copy of the new Certificate of Survey prepared by Mark Gronberg dated June 13, 2002 has
been included as an attachment.
60-DAY PROCESS
The application was received and deemed to be complete on or about June 18, 2002. Pursuant to
Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or
deny a land use request.
PUBLIC AGENCY PERMITTING ISSUES
Copies of the request and all suppo]-ting materials were forwarded to all involved public agencies
including Hennepin County, the DNR and the MCWD for review and comment. All written
comments received to date have been included as attachments.
-3495-
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
All property owners abutting the subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission
agenda on or around July 11, 2002 to inform them of the variance request.
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City
departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been
summarized below:
City Engineer Cameron
Refer to memorandum dated May 31, 2002 which
has been included as an attachment.
Public Works Director Skinner
A demolition permit can be issued after sewer and
water service(s) have been disconnected. Please
also refer to any and/or all comments from City
Engineer Cameron.
Building Official Simoneau
No objections.
Fire Chief Pederson
No objections.
Parks Director Jim Fackler
No comments from POSAC or DCAC.
Acting Police Chief McKinley
No concerns from the Police Department.
SITE VISIT
Members of the Planning Commission and City Council are encouraged to visit the subject
property prior to the meeting
-3496-
DISCUSSION
The property fronts Wilshire Boulevard on the south side and is bordered by a single-
family use to the east and a "dock lot" to the west which is tied to a parcel located on the
south side of CSAH 125. Portions of the subject property also extend into Seton Channel
excerpts.
Members of the Planning Commission are advised that a variance request was also
previously submitted in 1980 to expand the living area that acknowledged a number of
encroachment(s) and also recognized the undersized lot. However, the request was tabled
by the City Council and City staff is unable to locate a resolution verifying that the request
was granted.
3. Approximately 1/2 of the subject lot is located Under the 929.4 ordinary high water (OHW)
contour and is therefore not included in the minimum lot size calculation.
4. Strict application of the setback requirements creates a building pad of approximately 750
SF (+/-).
5. The subject property is irregularly shaped on all property lines (OHW, sideyard, and front
yard.)
Portions of the subject site are located in the floodplain. Based on review of the survey
information, the proposed new dwelling will be at or above the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation (RFPE) of 933 for the City of Mound.
The proposal, as submitted, may require separate permitting from the MCWD.
Specifically, the placement of fill and/or floodplain compensation issues will need to be
discussed with the MCWD.
The proposal, as submitted, removes the encroachments from the neighboring property
and also removes the encroachments from the County Road 125 right-of-way. The
proposal will also move the structure further away from CSAH 125 as it is currently
located (4.8) feet from the property line.
9. The alignment of County Road 125 was altered a number of years ago which may have
affected the front yard setback for the existing house.
10.
The turning movement into the garage may be problematic as there is only (16) feet from
the west edge of the driveway to the proposed building foundation. Optimally, the
minimum distance should be (20) feet if possible.
11. The proposed improvements will visually enhance the property as well as the surrounding
neighborhood.
-3497-
12. City staff's main concern regarding the application is the increase in the lakeshore setback
as the existing structure is currently located approximately (43) feet from the OHW.
However, the proposed reduced lakeshore setback seems to be a reasonable trade off in
light of the other positive aspects of the project including the removal of the
encroachments from the County Road and neighboring property as well as the
improvement in the setbacks on the west, south, and east sides.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the variance as
requested with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved fees associated with the
variance request.
2. All non-structural elements (landscaping, retaining wall, etc.) encroachments shall be
removed from the Wilshire Boulevard / County Road 125 right-of-way.
3. Hardcover fbr the subject site shall not exceed (40) percent
4. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer
prior to issuance of the building permit.
5. The applicant shall be responsible for all permitting issues including but not limited to any
and all permits required from the MCWD.
6. All comments from the City Engineer including the placement of fill.
7. The lowest floor of the proposed new structure shall meet the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation (RFPE) of 933.
In the event the structure is damaged more than (50) percent of its fair market value due
to fire or other natural disaster, it shall be reconstructed according to the current
requirements of the zoning ordinance.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review'
at its July 23, 2002 meeting in the event a recommendation fi'om the Planning Commission is
made at its July 15, 2002 meeting.
-3498-
City of Mound
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Planning Commission Date
City Council Date
Application Fee: $200.00
Distribution ~CityCity EngineerPlanner ,/~
-
~ Public Works
Please type or print legibly
Other
SUBJECT Address
PROPERTY
LEGAL Lot ~:)L~ci4_ I<~ S~...T~,~J I ~l..oc. lZ-~ ~C~°°~ Block
DESC.
Subdivision
PID ff Plat
ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
PROPER~ Name
ow. .
APPLICANT Name
(IF OTHER
Address
THAN
OWNER)
Phone (H) ~)~ .(M)
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedur~
for this property? Yes ( ) No (). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Variance Application
Page 1 of 3
Revised 03/20/02
-3499-
Case No. O~-c:~ /
3. Do 'the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE
(or existi ng)
Front Yard: ( k~ W ) ft. /~£~ ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E.~) ~ f-'t'- ft. /O "~""- ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S~W ) ;~ ~: ~-' PT'-
Rear Yard: ((~'~ S E W ) ft. ~ ~,F?- ft. ft.
q Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
· (NSEW) ft, ft. ft.
Street Frontage: ft. ~7 rD ~ ft. ft.
Lot Size: ~ sqft ~ ~(C,~ sqft sqft
Hardcover: sq ft ~.(p '7 (_o sq ft _sq ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in 'which it is
located? Yes (), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow
( ) too small
( ) too shallow
Please describe: ~o.~7
lq
topography
drainage
shape ~
soil
existing situation
other: specify
Variance Application
Page 2 of 3
Revised 03/20/02
-3500-
Case No. (~-a)
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain:
7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes (), No (). If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in
this petition? Yes (?z._), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the p~mises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of/idsPecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be require~ by~.!aw. ,,,/ / ,... ,~
~Z~..~~//
Owner's Signature /
X~,~ /////// 'Date /~/[
Applicant's Signature
Vadance Application
Page 3, of $
'Revised 03/20/02 - 3501 -
CITY OF MOUND
HARD¢OVER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
IIPROPERTY ADDRESS: '¢:~'r"~ [A//~c$1~'i'~F,' ~OvLEV/-k~D II
OWNER'S NAME: WI&.&-14A/t 'J~l~-~' '
I1
LOT AREA SQ. FT..X 30% = (for all lots) .'~ ............
LOT AREA ~ C) J C) ~ ' S Q:' ET;"' X ' 40'%':- ="" (for' r ~'tS dT' R~.-db'rd:) ........
LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only)
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlin.ed.in Zon!ng 0rd!0an. ce Sect. ion 350.~12.25,Su.bd:.6. B...1. (see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official..
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
HOUSE X = (~3 -t-lOOSE
TOTAL HOUSE 96 3
Io. ~
DETACHED BLDGS X
(GARAGE/SHED) X =
TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS .................
DRIVE'WAY, PARKING X = 2
AREAS, SIDEWALKS X '
ETC. 5'f'~'PP'~' g'C,~E,,S ,J,O~O.a~ 'X'GT~J.~* ~,~, ' If '
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .~ ................
DECKS O;,~,d,~k. ~/~' m~n
opening be~een boards) with ~ X =
pervious surface Under are
not counted as hardcover
OTHER
TOTAL DECK .......................... 4'3I
I~OC.,4 F~ r~J[ R_ocr~
i,2- ~,~ k~er x l I- ~.~ = Z5 _ goc~ r~,.~.
" t E~3~E
TOTAL OTHER ............. ,. ..... ...... ,.. ,~'?
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~J.~D"ER~ OVER (indicate differenoe.)..~ ..-. -~...o~ ~ .;.., .~ .- .- :... :.......~-,., . ~ . ....,-......
·
PREPARED BY d~0N~,~/'~ar f 4~0~/~1"e~'~/ /SC,,. DATE
~q~
.' 4'24'
-3502-
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
OWNER'S NAME:
CITY OF MOUND
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
LOT AREA
LOT AREA
LOT AREA
SO. FT. X 40%
= (for ali lots) ..............
= (for Lots of Record*)
SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only)
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined in Zoning Ordinance Sec'don 350:1225,$ubd. 6.8. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official
HOUSE
DETACHED BLDGS
(GARAGE/SHED)
DRIVEWAY; PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
DECKS Open decks {1/4" min.
opening between boerds} with a
pervJoua surface under are
not counted es hardcover
OTHER
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
,,¢~/4,.r ¢ x = /22 ~
e,c,vr x' =
X =
TOTALHOUSE
TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS
X
X
X
= b'aO
TOTALDRIVEWAY, ~C ..................
X =
X =
X =
TOTAL DECK
TOTAL OTHER ........ '..; ........ ......
.'7
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
~OVER (indicate difference) ...............................
PREPARED BY [~.~-,4d,'~"ZCE'/t~. ¢' ,"f./'./'dC///l'6'J",, )/~"('. DATE
-3503-
2 .o 7,6
· -- ?
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
WILLIAm[ BAKER
IN BLOCK 18, SETON, AND IN BLOCK 39, WYCHWOOD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
.. ........ N 89° E 6,.5.00 ...............
.... ,/"'"" ...o? ' :;C...~'""'"'".:.....,.,,._.
/ CHANNEL
929.4 CONTOUR LINE'...
NORTHWESTERLY LN£ OF' ,.: ,,, '",",
OF BLOCK 39
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES ' ~' "'
(936.2)
Thor pert of Lo( 8, Block 18, Seton, described ~s ccrrrnencing ot the most Westerly corner of
Block 59, Wychwood; thence Nor(he~sterly ~long ~he Northwesterly line of sold Block 39 o dist-
once of 26.5 fee~ to the octuol point of beginnin¢ of the I~nd to be described; thence North
i' (]long ~ line dr~wn et right ongles to the North I~ne of s~id Lot 8, to. sold North line; thence
E~st ~lon9 s~id North line o d~s(~nce of 6.3 feet; thence South dt right on, les from sold North
line to (he Northerly line of sdid Block .39; thence Southwesterly (]long so~d Northerly line of
Block .:39 to [he point of beginning; AND ALSO thdt. p~rt of Block 59, Wychwood, described ds
follows: Dec, inning ot the mos~ Westerly corner of s~id Block 59; thence E~sterly olong the
Southerly line of s~id block o dlstdnce of 70 feet; thence ct right ~ngles to sgid Southerly
line Northerly t.o the Northerly line of sold block; thence'Southwesterly (]long sold
Northerly line to ~he point of beginning. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS :
o : denotes iron m~rker 1) Goroge
(908.3): denotes existing spot elevotion, meon se(] level dotu-n
FCYCq: denotes proposed spot elewtion, rne~n se~ level d~tgrn 2) Top of foundotion
>: denotes proposed droinoge direction
Beerings shown ~re bosed upon ~n ~ssurned dotu-n.
This survey intends to show (he boundaries of the obove described proper(y,
the Ioca[ion of dn existing shed, ~nd the proposed Iocotion of o proposed house
thereon. It does not purpor~ (o show dny other improvements or encroochments.
SCALE
I hereby certify thd this survey ~s prep(red by me or ruder my direct super-
~ ,,,% GP, ONB~I{G & ASSOCIATES, INC. vision, ~nd that I om (] duly registered Civil edn~r (]nd L(~:I
6-13-02
Ica,, , , , , , ,, , , ~ork S. Gronber~l ~inaesoto L,icense ~mb, er 12755
02-013B
I
o
I
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR
WILLIAM BAKER
IN BLOCK 18, SETON, AND IN BLOCK 59, WYCHWOOD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
........... N 89° E 65.00 ........... .,
~ .. '%'".........
CHANNEL
9~9.4 C0~TOU~ D~E...
~ ~ ~ LINE .
KEYSTONE-
LEGAL DESCRIP ION 0
That p~rt of Lot 8, Block 18, Seton, described ~s c~ncing ~t the ~st Westerly corner of
Block 59, Wychwood; thence Northeo~terly olong the Northwesterly line of s~id Block 59 ~ dist-
once of 26.5 feet to the ~ctuol point of beginning of the I~nd to be described; thence North
olong ~ line drown ~t right ~ng!es to the North line of s~id Lot 8, to sold North line; thence
E~st ~long s~id North line ~ distance of 65 feet; thence South ~t right ~ngles fr~ s~id North
line to the Northerly line of s~id Block 59; thence Southwesterly ~long s~id Northerly line of
Block 59 to the point of beginning; AND ALSO thor port of Block 59, Wychwood, described ~s
follows: Beginnin~ ~t .the ~st Westerly corner of s~id Block 39; thence E~sterly ~long the
Southerly line of s~id block ~ distance of 70 feet; thence ~t righ~ ongles to s~id Southerly
line Northerly to the Northerly line of s~id block; thence Southwesterly ~long s~id
Northerly line to the point of beginning.
o : denotes iron ~rker /) ~a~¢¢ : ~,
Bearings shown are based upon an ass~d dat~. ~) / / / lg ~ c~ : ? Z ~. &
~: Proposed drainage direction ~fl~d/~/:~: ?q¢. o O/ZkoF'-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ the laws of the State of Uimesota. D~TE
~247~141 02-013A
[~ Mark S. Oronber~ Minnesota License Number 12755
I
0
I
IN BLOCK
(929.8) 0
Z
(930.7) ~,~
NAILS SET IN %
(032.0
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF.
BLOCK 3g, WYCHWOOD "-.
CERTIFICATE SURVEY FOR
WILLIAM. BAKER
18, SETON, AND IN
HENNEPIN COUNTY,
.......... N 89° E
BLOCK 59,
MINNESOTA
63.00 .............
CHANNEL
929.4- CONTOUR LINE...
. ~o~,~ o~ ..... ...SURVEY
(~,.o)1 LINE
WYCHWOOD
r
"0- /
NORTHERLY LINE OF
BLOCK 3g, WYCHWOOI~.
CONCRETE I)
WALKS
LOT 60ENER
FALLS 1.4-4 ,., ." ' " ...... '....,
IN. HpUSE
EDgE
"'" n.OOR EXISTING
' , HOUSE HOUSE
MOST WESTERLY CORNER ....""
OF BLOCK 39, WYCHWOOD
(935.7) "'""...
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES · ', ..,
That part of Lot 8, Block 18, Satan, described as corrmencing at the most Westerly corner of
Block 59, Wychwood; thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Block 59 a dist-
ance of 26.5 feet to the actual point of beginnin9 of the land to be described; thence North
along a line drawn at right angles to the North line of said Lot 8, to said North line; thence
East along said North line a d~stance of 63 feet; thence South at right angles from said North
line to the Northerly line of said Block 39; thence Southwesterly along sa~d Northerly line of
Block 59 to the point of beginning; AND ALSO that part of Block 39, Wychwood, described as'
follows: Beginning at the most Westerly corner of said Block 39;. thence Ebsterly along the
Southerly line of said block a distance of 70 feet; thence at right angles to said Southerly
line Northerly to the Northerly line of said block; thence Southwesterly along said
Northerly line to the point of beginning.
· denotes iron morker
(908.5). denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum
Bearings shown dre based upon on assumed datum.
This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of an existing house and shed, and the location of all visible "hardcover"
thereon. It does not purport to show, any other ,imp.rovements or encroachments.
GGRONBERG & ASSOCIATE3, INC.
,¢,5 I~ ~ll.l.OW ~ LOll} I.~ ·
!152-4734141
ECD
I hereby certify ti'mt this survey wos prel~red by me or. un. der my direct super-
vision,, and that I ~ o duly registered Civil Engineer (]nd L~d Surveyor under
the laws of the State of Minnesota,
~rk S..Gron,be, r~,, Minnesota License Number 12755
SCALE
1 "=20'
DATE
1-17-02
JOB NO', '
02-013
02-013
3508'
-3509-
-3510-
-3511-
-35'12- -
- 3513-
%.
-3514-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 31, 2002
TO:
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
FROM:
John Cameron, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Baker Variance
4948 Wilshire Boulevard
Case #02-13
MFRA #13746
As requested, we have reviewed the survey submitted with subject variance application and have the
following comments and recommendations:
The flood plain may be an issue at the northwest corner of the improvements (retaining ~all).
No fill is allowed to be placed below the 931.5 elevation. A more detailed grading and
erosion control plan of this area will be required with the building permit application.
Any retaining wall over 4 feet high must be designed by a professional engineer. Because
this wall will be supporting a driving surface, we would suggest the applicant have the wall
designed by a professional even if it is not over the 4 feet height.
Ail encroachments into the County right-of-way are to be removed The applicant needs to
contact Hennepin County regarding a new driveway. The County may require a new culvert
under the proposed driveway.
s:hnain:\Mou 13746:\Correspondence~smith5-2g
-3515-
NAME OF
APPLICANT
FEE $ --.~-~
PROPERTY , ~
ADDRESS ~ ~/~
FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) "
--------------' Te l~ph~---_
Address..__ ~ Number '"--2...~.. :'
FRONT I ' _ ....-' I . ACCESSORY
YARD !/'~,/Z:~FT.J BUILDING '"
NOTE:
FT.I
YARD
N. C. U.* or
OTHER (describe)
REASON FOR REQUEST:
FOOTAGE
1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing
showing location of proposed improvement
in relation to lot lines, other buildings
on property and abut~ng streets.
Z. Give ownership and dimensions of
adjoining property. Show approximate
locations of all buildings, driveways,
and streets pertinent to the application
by extending survey or drawing.
3. Attach letters from adjoining affect._
property owners showing attitude toward
request.
,g pez PF
council resolutioD~4~_variance granted becomes mull and void.
AppLIcANT:.` ~~-'---'~ DATE '7'-- //~--/~J
~//-/' S~nature '.
PLANNING COMMXSSION RECOMMENDATION Acknowledged encroachment and unders i zed
lot and recommended approval of addition providi.ng addition meets ail existing setback
requirements. DATE July 28~ ]980
COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO.
12, 1980 Council Meeting.
Tab]ed (To allow owneF to resolve encroachment problem.)
DATE
-3516-
*non-conforming use
August
Ac t i on:
MINNEHAHA CREEK
Minnehaha Creek
WATERSHED 6124? 1 ~682
Watershed District
P.02/0~
Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life
Gray Freshwater Center
Hwys. 15 & 19, Navan'e
Mail:
2500 Shadywood Road
· Excelsior, MN 55331-9578
Phone: (952) 471-0590
Fax: (g52) 471-0682
Email:
admin @ rninnehahacreek.or§
Web Site:
www. minnehahacreek.org
of Managers
Pamela G, Blixt
James Calklns
I_~nce Fisher
Monica Gross
ScottThomas
Richard Miller
Robert Schroeder
()~'rl~ed on re~fcle~ paper c~ntalning
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
July 8, 2002
Sarah Smith, City of Mound; William Baker
Michael Wyatt, District Technician
Permits for 4948 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound
This memo is to inform the City of Mound and the property owner at
4948 Wilshire Boulevard in the City of Mound that from the current
proposal, the project proposed at the location stated above appears to
require permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Due to
the size of the project, it is apparent that the new home construction
will involve the significant amount of excavation (5000 ft.2 or 50 yds))
required for the MCWD Rule B: Erosion Control permit. In addition, it
appears as though there is the potential for impacts to the floodplain
of Lake Minnetonka (at or below 931.5' in elevation) which would be
subject to additional requirements. Two foot elevation contours of the'
existing and proposed elevations must be submitted in order to verify
the applicability of floodplain Rules, However, if floodplain Rules do
apply, permits for such construction will require Board of Managers
approval. Applications such as these, typically require 30-45 days
prior to permits being issued.
Please submit an application for this project ~or. District review as soon
as possible. Delays in submittals will ultimately delay the project
timeline, Please mail the enclosed application to:
Attn: District Technician
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Gray Freshwater Center
2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 140
Excelsior, MN {~5331
-3517-
Excerpts from the
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
June 3, 2002
CASE//02-13 Variance for New House Construction - Bill Baker
4948 Wilshire Boulevard
The applicant has submitted a variance request to allow construction of a new single-family
dwelling at 4948 Wilshire Boulevard. Zoning is R1 residential.
~ Required ~
Front (S) - upper st. wall 8 feet 30 feet 22 feet
Side (W) - wall 3 feet 6 feet 3 feet
Side (W) - pilings 0 feet 6 feet 6 feet
Side (E) - deck 2 feet 4 feet 2 feet
Lakeside (N) 29 feet 50 feet 21 feet
Lot Area 6,010 sf 10,000 sf 3,990 sf
A variance request was submitted in 1980 to expand the living area that acknowledge
encroachments and the undersized lot. However, the request was tabled by the City Council and
staff is unable to locate a resolution verifying that the request was granted.
Property fronts Wilshire Boulevard on the south and is bordered by a single-family use to the
east and a "dock lot" to the west. Approximately V2 of the lot is located under the 929.40HW
and is not included in the minimum lot size calculation. Setback requirements create a building
pad of approximately 750 SF. Property is irregularly shaped. The proposal may require separate
permitting from the MCWD. The proposal removes the encroachments from the neighboring
property and the county road right-of-way. Turning movements into the garage may be
problematic. The proposed improvements will visually enhance the property. The east side of
the proposed lakeside deck will be modified to meet the required setback of four feet. Staff's
primary concern is the reduced lake setback. Neighbor is concerned about the pile driving on the
west lot line would disturb the lilac bushes.
Discussion
Mueller wanted a building height interpretation: Is garage basement or first floor. Smith said
the Building official indicates that, if a level is more than 50% exposed it is considered a story.
Mueller thought it looks like the garage level is a stow. Baker said it conforms to the 35 feet
requirement. Mueller wanted to know why are we calling a carport with a solid roof a
cantilevered area when it is on posts? Why didn't we call that a deck? Per the code, a deck that
goes to the property line attached to the dwelling is not allowed. Baker replied that the cantilever
allows us a mm-around and space for 2 cars on the property. Mueller asked if, from a structural
standpoint, is it necessary to have those posts and beams go west that far. Baker indicated that
we couldn't back out of the garage without running into the posts.
-3518-
Planning Commission Minutes
June 3, 2002
Clapsaddle wanted to know what the deck will be built of?. Baker said it would be a basic floor
structure with beams. The second story wall could be moved back to the 6 foot setback line.
Burma liked the sound of that. Weiland (Referring to Item 9 under recommendations) Why
should we go through the variance process if after a natural disaster it would be required to be
rebuilt according to current setback requirements.
MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Burma, to recommend a 6 foot setback on west, 6 foot from
the wall of the house on the east, 29 foot lakeside deck setback, 8 foot front yard setback, 35 foot
(as measured by the calculation of the building official) maximum height and maximum 40%
hardcover. Also include all items under staff recommendation except #2 and require removal of
the lakeside shed before occupancy is granted.
Clapsaddle could not understand why staff brought a proposal to construct a house with
variances on every side. It is creative but unbelievable and not the intent of the code.
MOTION failed. Mueller and Burma voted for; Michael, Weiland, Hasse, Ayaz, Clapsaddle
voted against.
MOTION by Clapsaddle, second by Michael, to move denial of the variance request.
Clapsaddle would like to see an in-between or a new plan.
Burma feels that it is somewhat of an in-between because the east and west setbacks are being
increased and it's a weird shaped lot.
Baker submitted a petition of all but one neighbor in support of his plan.
Mueller said that it currently has a dwelling on it and wasn't it City Attorney advice that we have
to let them improve their property. The encroachments are being improved. The condition of
the property will deteriorate and this would be an improvement. I consider this reasonable use of
the property.
MOTION carried. Clapsaddle, Ayaz, Hasse, Weiland and Michael voted for. Burma and
Mueller voted against.
-3519-
PETITION
May28,2002
In support of Bill Baker
To Mound, MN- Planning Commission
Meeting June 03, 2002
I/We have reviewed Bill Baker's plans for a demolition and rebuild
project at 4948 Wilshire Blvd. I/We are aware of the variance being
applied for, and I/We will support and are accepting of the proposed plan
being presented by Bill Baker to the Mound, MN Planning Commission.
Name Address Phone#
Signature
9
10
7
8
11
12
13
14
15
-3520-
CH'Y OF MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SIll{ET
SURVEY ON FILE~ NO
LOT OF RECORD? ~'~1 NO
YARD I DIRECTION I
IIOUSE .........
ZONING DISI'RICI',LO'FSIZE/WIDTH:
~10,000/60 gl '?,500/0
RIA ~,000/40 B2 20,000/80
R2 H,O00/40 B3 10,000/~0
R2 14,000/80 *~,
R3 SEE ORD. I1 30o000/100
EXISTING LOT SIZE:
LOT WID'Hi:
LOT DEPTH:
REQUIRED I EXISTING/PROPOSED VARIANCE
FRONT N S E W
FRONT N S E W
SIDE N S E W
SIDE N S E W
t'.EAR N S E W 15' ~.
LAKI'.' N S E W 50'
TOp OF BI,UFF 10' ()R 30'
(;Alt. AGE, SIIED ..... DETACIIED BUILDINGS
'~RONT N S E W ' '
FRONT N S E W .
SIDE N S E W 4'OR6'
SIDE N S E W 4'0R6'
REAR N S E W 4'
LAKE
N S E W
TOP OF BI,UFF
HARDCOV ER
30% OR 40%
50'
10' OR 30' '
CONrO,U,.N6? ¥~s ; No ? I uY: ]u,vruD:
This Zoning hd'otmadon Sheet only sunmlatizc$ a poilion o1' lite icquircmcnls nullincd itt Ibc City of Mound /orating Or,llmtnce. For fitrdler information, contact the City of Mound
Plalming Department at 472-0600.
GOVT LOTS i
t-i17-24
5341 Ma~vood Road
Mound~ MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: July 10, 2002
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit / Variance(s) for Mound Public Safety Building
APPLICANT: City of Mound represented by SEH Consulting and Amcon
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-24 and 02-25
PID: 24-117-24-21-0034
LOCATION: 2415 Wilshire Boulevard (Fire Station) and 5341 Maywood Road (City Hall)
ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Public / Institutional
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
The City Council will hold a public hearing for review of an application from
SEH Consulting, on behalf of the City of Mound, for a Conditional 'Use Permit to allow
construction of a new public safety building at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard. The proposed project
also requires the approval of the following variance(s) to address various site related issues:
Required/Allowed Proposed
Variance
Hardcover 70,626 SF 87,149 SF 16,523 SF
40% 51% 11%
Building height - fire hose tower 35' 60'
(NOTE: As measured from the "average grade" of 958.0 to the mid-point of gable
25'
PROJECT DETAILS
The City of Mound plans to demolish the existing fire hall and construct a new public safety
building that will provide office, training and storage space for both the Mound Fire Department
and the Police Department which is currently located in the lower level at City Hall. The
proposed project also includes numerous site improvements including modifications to the
driveway entrance(s), a new parking plan, extensive landscaping plantings and a stormwater pond.
-3522-
BACKGROUND
Members of the City Council are advised that specific details regarding the CUP request are
outlined in Planning Report No. 02-24 / 02-25. Details regarding the Planning Commission's
review of the application are contained in the July 15, 2002 Planning Commission meeting minute
excerpts.
CUP REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permits are
reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350:535 Subd. 3 (C)
requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Members of the City Council are
advised that the Notice of Public Hearing for the public hearing was published in the Laker on
July 13, 2002. Additionally, the Notice of'Public Hearing was also mailed to all affected property
owners located within (350) feet on or around July 12, 2002.
60-DAY PROCESS
The conditional use permit application was received and deemed to be complete on June 28,
2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days
to approve or deny a land use request.
OPTION # 2 STORMWATER / RAINWATER GARDEN IMPROVEMENTS
Members of the Public Safety Project Team reviewed and discussed a proposed alternative design
to accommodate stormwater on the site (Option # 1 ) at its July 15, 2002 which would preserve a
number of mature trees located on the east side of the driveway entrance on M. aywood Road. A
number of minor alternations to Option # I were made including realigning the driveway with
Cypress and reducing the number of retention ponds to one (1). It is anticipated that additional
landscaping will be installed in the area of the "City of Mound" sign currently located on the west
side of the driveway. A copy of the new design (Option # 2) has been included as an attachment.
RECOMMiENDATION
Based on its review, the iPlanning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council
approval of the Conditional Use Permit and variance(s) to allow construction of the new public
safety building at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard subject to the following minirnun~ conditions:
Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
The building design and materials shall be subject to review by the Planning
Commission and approval by the City Council.
3. The landscape plan shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission and
-3523-
approval by the City Council.
The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all required
permitting activities
5. Irrigation is included in the project to ensure the survival of the new landscaping.
All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the
Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects.
Screening shall be installed along the south side of the property to buffer the proposed
parking lot from the adjacent residence located immediately south of the new building
in accordance with the City Code,
8. All designated parking areas should be striped and appropriately signed.
9. Additional comments fi'om the Planning Commission, City Council and Staff.
ATTACHMENTS
· Resolution No. 02- (draft)
· Planning Report No. 02-24 / 02-25
· July 15, 2002 Planning Commission meeting minute attachments
· Notice of Public Hearing
· Affidavit of Mailing and Henn. Co. map
· Affidavit of Publication
· Alternate concept drawing of proposed storrnwater / rainwater garden improvements
· (Option#2)
· Applicant narrative and project plans
-3524-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 02-
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL 'USE PERMIT AND
VARIANCE(S) FOR THE CITY OF MOUND TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF
A NEW PUBLIC SAFiETY BUILDING WITHIN THE R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
AT 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
LOTS 9-13, BLOCK 3, SHIRLEY HILLS 'UNIT D
PID # 24-117-24-21-0034
P&Z CASE # 02-24 / 02-25
WHEREAS, the applicant, SEH Consulting, on behalf of the City of Mound, has
applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a new Public Safety
Building at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, local government buildings are allowed in the R-1 single-family
residential district by conditional use; and
WHEREAS, whereas, the proposed project also requires the approval of the
following variance(s); and
Allowed iProposed Variance
Hardcover 70,626 SF
4O %
Building height - fire hose tower 35'
87,149 SF 16,523 SF
51% 11%
60' 25'
WHEREAS, the City of Mound plans to demolish the existing fire hall and
construct a new public safety building at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard that will provide
of'rice, training and storage space for both the Mound Fire Department and the Police
Department which is currently located in the lower level at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project also includes numerous site improvements
including modifications to the driveway entrance(s), a new parking plan, extensive
landscaping plantings and stormwater improvements; and
-3525-
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the conditional use permit
and variance(s) request(s) at its July 15, 2002 meeting and unanimously
recommended approval subject to conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota as follows:
The City does hereby grant the Conditional Use iPermit for and Variances to
allow construction ora new public safety building at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard
subject to the following conditions:
a. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the
City Engineer.
b. The building design and materials shall be subject to review by the
Planning Commission and approval by the City Council.
c. The landscape plan shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission
and approval by the City Council.
d. The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all
required permitting activities
e. Irrigation is included in the project to ensure the survival of the new
landscaping.
All use, development, construction and operation requirements and
standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property
in all respects.
Screening shall be installed along the south side of the property to buffer
the proposed parking lot fi'om the adjacent residence located immediately
south of the new building in accordance with the City Code.
h. All designated parking areas should be striped and appropriately signed.
i. Additional comments from the Planning Commission, City Council and
Staff.
This Conditional Use Permit and Variance(s) is approved for the following
legally described property:
Lots 9-13, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit F, City of Mound, Minnesota.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilrnember
and seconded by Councilmember
-3526-
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted July 23, 2002
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-3527-
Excerpts from
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 15, 2002
BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE #02-24 & 02-25 Conditional Use Permit/Variance(s)
City of Mound Public Safety Building
2415 Wilshire Blvd / 5341 Maywood Rd
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Weiland, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use
Permit and Variances per staff recommendation.
MOTION carried unanimously
Miles Britz of Short Elliott Hendrickson briefly outlined the plan for the Commission.
-3528-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
CASE # 02-25
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FROM THE CITY OF MOUND FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING IN AN R-1 RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICT AT
2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
LOTS 9-13, BLOCK 3, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D
PID # 24-117-24-21-0034
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota
will meet in the Council Chambers, 5431 Maywood Road, at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, July
23, 2002 to hold a public hearing to consider an application from the City of Mound for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow construction ora new public safety building at 2415
Wilshire Boulevard for the Mound Volunteer Fire Department and Mound Police
Department. The subject property is legally described as follows:
Lots 9-13, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit D.
PID # 24-117-24-21-0034
Copies of the application materials and project plans are available to the public upon
request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above
will be given tile opportunity to be heard at this meeting
Notice to be mailed to affected property owners within (350) feet or before July 12, 2002.
Published in The Laker on July 13, 2002.
Inspections Secretary
printed on recycled paper
-3529-
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
HEARING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Jill Norlander, being duly sworn, deposes and says; I am a United States
Citizen, over twenty-one.(21) years of age, and the Secretary. for Planning and
Inspections Department of the City of Mound, Minnesota.
On ~ // ,20 ~o~ , acting on behalf of the
I deposited in the United States Post Office at Mound, Minnesota, copies of the
attached notice of a hearing on proposed improvement/enclosed in sealed
;envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons
":at the addresses appearing opposite their respective names. '-
NAME ADDRESS
*See attached list.
is delivery service by the United States mail betWeen
Places so addressed.
the place of mailin
? '. r:.
Subscribed and swOrn to before me this
day
~3530-
-3531 -
Affidavit of Publication
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin.
Bill Holm, being duly sworn on oath, says that he
is an authorized agent and employee of the
publisher of the newspaper known as THE
LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full
knowledge of the facts which are stated below:
A.) The newspaper has complied with all the
requirements constituting qualifications as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota
Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable
laws, as amended.
B.) The printed Case ¢:02-25
CUP Public Safety Bu~ldinq
which is attached was cut from the columns of
said newspaper, and was printed and published
once each week for 1. successive weeks.
It was first published Saturday
the '1 3 day of Ju 1 ¥ 2002,
and was thereafter printed and published
every Saturday, to and including Saturday,
the __ day of
2OO2;
v ~u't'horized Agent
Suscribed and sworn to me on this
1 3. day ,o~/Ju 1 V ,2002.
. Notary Publi_c_='
~ ~ NOTARY PUBUC-MiNNE8OTA ~
Rate Information
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space: $15.50 per inch.
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for above matter: $15.50.
(3) Rate actually charged for above matter: $7.96 per inch.
Each additional successive week: $5.79.
-3532-
CURB &~ GUTTEr
.27
TOP= 940. ,7,5
D
GUY
MAPLE
4* M~PLE
-IALL
CRAB
13" UAPLE
15'
0
15' M,I. PLE
961 e 96,
MAPLE
16' MAPt~
5341 M,'lywood Ro=~d
,Mound, MN 55364
(952) ,172-3190
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: July 10, 2002
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit / Variance(s) for Mound Public Safety Building
APPLICANT: City of Mound represented by SEH Consulting and Arncon Construction
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-24 and 02-25
PID: 24-117-24-21-0034
LOCATION: 24'15 Wilshire Boulevard (Fire Station) and 5341 Maywood Road (City Hall)
ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Public / Institutional
REQUEST
SEH Consulting, on behalf of the City of Mound, has submitted all application For a Conditional
Use Permit to allow construction ora new public safety building at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard The
proposed project also requires the approval of' the following variance(s) to address various site
related issues:
Required / Allowed Proposed Variance
Hardcover 70,626 SF 87,149 SF 16,523 SF
40% 51% 11%
Building height - fire hose tower 35' 60'
(NOTE: As mensured from the "av'era,,e,. ,,,~rade" of 958.0 lo the mid-l)oint of gable root)
25'
PROJECT DETAIiLS
The City of' Mound plans to demolish the existing fire hall and construct a new public safety
building that will provide of'rice, training and storage space f'or botil the Mound Fire Department
and the Police Department wilich is currently located in the lower level at City Hall. The
proposed project also includes numerous site improvements including modifications to tile
driveway entrance(s), a new parking plan, extensive landscaping plantings and a stormwater pond
Details regarding tile project are outlined in the project plans that have been included as a separate
attachment.
-3534-
The proposed new multi-story building includes a footprint of 20,157 SF and will be located at
the intersection of~Ma~OOd Road_andWJlshireBou!e~ard !he firedeparu~ent, wi!! be~ocated
fire equipment storage and a hose tower on the south side. The front of the building includes an
extensive landscaping program near the intersection and also includes a plaza area near the entry.
The police department is located on the lower level and will be accessed from the driveway offof
Maywood Road. Staff parking is provided behind the building and public parking is provided on
the north side of Maywood Road. Access to the City Hall parking lot is also provided via a new
driveway located in the southwest corner of the property.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA
In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and
recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed land use upon the
health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Members of the
Planning Cornmission are advised that the conditional use permit review criteria are contained in
City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 1.
CUP REVIEW PROCEDU RE
City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permits are
reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350:535 Subd. 3 (C)
requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that
the planning agency and/or governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for
conditional use permits and further requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least
(10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350)
feet.
Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the Notice of Public Hearing fbr the
upcoming public hearing to be held by the City Council was published in the Laker on July 13
2002. Additionally, the Notice of Public Hearing was also mailed to all affected property owners
located within (350) feet on or before July 12, 2002
60-DAY PROCESS
The conditional use permit application was received and deemed to be complete on June 28,
2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days
to approve or deny a land use request.
-3535-
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Zo,iing, The Subject site is zoned R,I ReSidentialI ASSet f,orti] in city Code Chapter 350:640,
local governmental buildings are allowed by conditional use in the R-1 District.
Comprehensive Plan. The Mound Comprelnensive Plan guides the subject property for future
public / institutional use.
Hardcover. Impervious surface coverage is limited to no more than (40) percent in the R-1
District. A variance has been requested to exceed tlne hardcover regulations by (11) percent. In
order to accommodate the stormwater associated with the project, a new stormwater pond is
proposed to be constructed.
Building Height. Building tneight is limited to 2 % stories or thirty-five (35) Feet in tine R-I
District. According to the City Code, building height is defined as fbllows:
"']'he vertica/ di.waiic¢ Io be mea,s'ured./)'om /he avera~ge grade qf lhe bni]ding line lo lhe
lo lop, lo the cornice q/'a.flal roq/: Io I/'w deck line q/'a man,s'ard roq/~ lo a poinl on lhe
rob?/'directly above the highe,w wall or a .vhec/ roq/~ Io lhe Ul)t)ermo.w /)omi on a round or
other arch O,7)e I'Og/[ 1o lhe 171e(111 dJ.vJuI1Uc~ (~/' [hu hi,g, he.vl ,gable Oll lhe /)ilched or hJj)
I'0(~ "
Based on the site plans that were submitted, tile "average grade" has been determined to be 958.0
based upon a top elevation of 965.0 and a low elevation of 951.0 on tile subject site. Therefore,
958.0 is deemed to be the "starting point" or "datum" for calculation of the building height. The
proposed new building meets the height regulations as set forth in the City Code with the
exception of the fire hose tower which is approximately (60) feet in height as measured from the
958.0 elevation to tile mid-point of the gable roof.
Parking.
Calculation oF Required Stalls. City Code Section 350:760, Subd. 5 (P) states that tine
parking requirements for all uses not specifically referenced in SubdMsion 5 shall be
determined by the Planning Commission and the City Council The following parking
spaces are proposed fbr the new public safety building:
Handicapped parking 2
Staff' (west side of building) 7
Public parking (south side of Maywood Road) 9
Emergency response tcmporar>, parking .-site / \¥ilshir¢ glxd 33 (+/-)
Members of the Planning Comnaission are also advised that on-street parking is allowed on
both sides of Maywood Road and Wilshire Boulevard.
-3536-
Stall Size. Each parking space shall n.ot be less than (10) feet in width and twenty (20)
feet in length. Additionally, handicapped stalls shall be provided and constructed in
accordance with state law with stalls not less than twelve (12) feet wide and twenty (20)
feet in length. All designated stalls meet the size requirements of the City Code with the
exception of the emergency response parking stalls which are deemed to be "temporary"
and are therefore not subject to the regulations.
Screening..City Code Section 350:760, Subd 2 (B) states that whenever an off-street
parking lot for six (6) or more cars is adjacent to a Residential District, a fence of
adequate design, not over five (5) feet in height nor less than four (4) feet in height shall
be erected along the property tine. Currently, there is a privacy fence located along the
southern property tine. As the condition of the fence is unknown at this time, it is possible
a new fence may need to be erected
Surfacing and Curbing. City Code Chapter 350:760. Subd. 3 (C) states that all parking
areas and access drives for multiple-family, commercial and industrial uses shall be paved
with concrete or bituminous surfacing with proper drainage and concrete curb.
Building Materials. The primary exterior material roi' the new building will be pre-cast concrete
wall panels. The wall panels will be treated using several different methods and/or techniques in
order to create the appearance of ditTerent stone materials and/or designs. The use of metal and
horizontal banding is also being incorporated into the building so as to reinfbrce the "lakefront
resort" concept which is the prevalent theme of the Mound Design and Environmental Guidelines.
Members of the Planning Cornmission are advised that representatives from SEH Consulting and
the members of tile Public Safety Project Team will be present at the meeting to discuss the
proposed design and architecture features of the building in detail.
Landscaping. A proposed landscaping plan was submitted as part of the application materials.
In general, the proposed plan appears to provide adequate plantings around the building and on
the subject site.
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City
departments for review and comment and are summarized below:
City Engineer Cameron
Refer to memorandum dated July 9, 2002 which has
been included as an attaclnment.
Public Works Director Skinner
Please refer to comments fi'om City Engineer
Cameron.
-3537-
Building Official Simoneau An area. of 50 SF must be dedicated for recycling
containment.
Fire Chief Pederson
Parks Director Jim Fackler
Acting Police Chief McKinley
PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW
.No objections.
No comments.
Staff parking on the west side of
building (lower level) is deemed to be acceptable.
Copies of the request and all supporting materials were t'orwarded to all applicable public agencies
for review. All comments received to date are summarized below:
Hennepin County
No objections.
MCWD
DISCUSSION 'POINTS
Refer to letter dated July 8, 2002 which has
been included as an attachment.
The subject site includes both the fire station and city hall buildings and is regulated by the
following Conditional Use Permit(s):
Resolution No. 90-33
Resolution No. 95-33
CUP for City Hall remodel project and
variances.
CUP amendment for addition to well house
at fire station.
The original fire station building was constructed in 1955. A major addition was
constructed in 1980. Since that time, the City's population has tripled, the number of calls
has increased approximately 400 percent, the size of the department has doubled and the
duties and training requirements have significantly expanded.
3. The Mound Fire Department provides contract services to several adjacent municipalities.
4. The existing police department facility lacks indoor storage for police vehicles, equipment
and confiscated goods.
The proposed "combined" structure will optimize shared space between the fire and police
departments and includes garage bays for fire vehicles, training space for fire and police
and storage space for both fire and police equipment.
-3538-
6. An alternate design for the proposed stormwater pond to be located on the east side of the
driveway entrance on MaywoOd Road is u0der Prelilninary review by the Public Safety
Bd{iding c0mmitt4~ and ci{~ s{aff ~l~iS ai,ceriuatNe inc0rp0rhtes the use Of raiii~'a~r
garden" techniques and would include a series of ponds and detention areas including a
"wet pond" located on the west side of the driveway off of Maywood Road which could
serve as a water amenity as well as an entrance feature to City Hall. The positive aspects
of the modified proposal are identified as follows:
a. The proposed design would preserve a number of mature trees and would also
soften and enhance the building entrance.
b. The existing tree stand would buffer the lower level parking area.
c. An additional parking stall could be added to the lower level parking area.
d. The amount ofhardcover may be reduced.
A copy of the proposed alternate design has been included as an attachment.
7. Lighting for the site should be reviewed and discussed
8. Signage details should be reviewed and discussed
9. The use of metal shingles as opposed to asphalt is preferred due to the extended life
expectancy.
10. Screening for any and/or all rooftop mechanical equipment should be architecturally
compatible with the principal structure
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Comrnission recommend Council approval of the Conditional
Use Permit and variance(s) to allow construction of the new public safety building at 2415
Wilshire Boulevard subject to the following minimum conditions:
Grading and drainage plans shall be su(ject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
The building design and materials shall be subject to review by tine 'Planning
Commission and approval by the City Council.
The landscape plan shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission and
approval by the City Council.
4. The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all required
-3539-
permitting activities
5. Irrigation is included in the project to ensure the survival of the new landscaping.
All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the
Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects.
If necessary, a new fence shall be installed along the south side of the property to
buffer the proposed parking lot from the adjacent residence located immediately south
of the new building in according with the City Code.
8. All designated parking areas should be striped and appropriately signed.
9. Additional comments from tile Planning Commission, City Council and Staff'.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
The public hearing roi' review of the C'UP request for tile new public safety building is scheduled
to be held by the City Council at its Tuesday, July '>' '>007 meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
Memorandum from City Engineer dated July 9, 2002
Letter from MCWD dated July 8, 2002
Alternate concept drawing of proposed stormwater / rainwater garden improvements
Applicant narrative and project plans (separate packet)
-3540-
Engineering · Planning · Surveying
FRA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 9, 2002
TO:
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
FROM:
John Cameron, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Public Safety Facility
Conditional Use Permit
Case No. 02-25
MFR~ #13747
As requested, we have reviewed the plans submitted for a CUP on the proposed new Public Safety
Facility and have the following comments and recommendations. We also received the application
for the hardcover variance and have no comments on that issue.
Site Plan
1. Wilshire Boulevard and Maywood Road are both Municipal State Aid streets. They each
meet the minimum width standard to allow parallel parking on both sides.
Grading Plan
1. No Comments
Utility Plan
The existing catch basin located in the police parking area at the east end of City Hall
appears to fall in the west curb line of the new entrance road. This structure should be
retained and adjusted to match the new grades.
-3541 -
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota ° 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-ma#: mfra@mfra.com
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
July 9, 2002
Page 2
2. The final plans will need to address the following utility issues:
a. Disposition of existing water service to existing fire station;
b. Reconstruction of catch basins in Maywood Road and Wilshire Boulevard to match new
curb line;
c. Relocation of existing hydrant on Wilshire Boulevard; and
d. Disposition of existing 10" watermain to pump house.
Miscellaneous
1. Stormwater management approval will be required, hopefully the City will have the
permitting authority very soon and will be in a position to issue this permit rather then the
MCWD.
2. Stormwater management issues on the future parking lot will need to be addressed at such
time this lot is constructed.
3. Abandonment of City Well No. 6 shall be in conformance with State Health Department
requirements.
4. Closure of monitoring well shall meet MPCA requirements.
cc: Loren Gordon, HKGI
s:~main:Wlou 13747:\Correspondence~smith7-9
-3542-
Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District
z,,,?,-o,,i,,xofW,, er, of
Gray Freshwater Center
Hwys. 15 & 19, Navarre
Mail:
2500 Shadywood Road
Excelsior, MN 55331-9578
Phone: (952) 471-0590
Fax: (952) 471-0682
Email:
admin @minnehahacreek.org
Web Site:
www. minnehahacreek.org
Board of Managers
Pamela G. Blixt
James Calkins
Lance Fisher
Monica Gross
Scott Thomas
Richard Miller
Robert Schroeder
(~ Printed on recycled paper containing
at least 30% post consumer waste.
July 8, 2002
Sarah Smith
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RE: City of Mound Fire & Public Safety Facility
Dear Applicant:
After reviewing the site plans for the project cited above, it appears that the project
will require permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Disln'ict. We encourage
you to submit an application as soon as possible. Projects of this nature will require
approval of the MCWD Board of Managers which typically ranges between 30-45
days. Delays in submittals will ultimately result in project delays.
Please consult MCWD Rules (www.minnehahacreek. org) for guidm~ce on the
required exhibits to be submitted with an application. In addition to the items
included in the District Rules, the following bulleted items must be submitted as a
part of this specific project application:
· Submit a signed and completed copy of the Combined Joint Notification Form
· Rule A: Procedural Requirements
1. Submit address labels obtained from Hermepin County which cite the
names and addresses of all of the property owners who reside within 600 feet
of the project area
.......') Notification of approval or preliminary approval from *~'~ r,.~,,~,~. Council or
Planning Commission
· Rule B: Erosion Control
1. Plan must state with detail vegetation and stabilization will occur within
48 hours of comPleted grading
2. An erosion control plan must be submitted with this application. This
includes indication of silt fence, which must be placed on all downhill slopes
in areas where grading will occur
3. Stockpile areas must be indicated on site plan
· Rule D: Wetland Protection
1. Perform a wetland determination and subsequent delineation of any/all
existing wetlands on site
2. If wetlands are found to exist, impacts must be assessed in accordance
with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. If wetlands will not be
impacted or partially impacted, wetland buffers must be proposed adjacent to
all delineated boundaries. Buffers will range between 16.5'-35' in accordance
-3544-
with MCWD Rule D. Buffers must be indicated on the submitted site plan.
To comply with Rule D requirements, wetland buffers cannot be encroached
upon by structures or other vegetation disturbing activities. In addition,
following Board approval, the wetland buffers must be recorded with the
Property Tax Unit of Hennepin County and must remain undisturbed in
perpetuity.
Rule N: Stormwater Management
1. Stormwater Management requirements must be assessed in accordance
with Rule N and are directly dependent on the size of the project parcel.
2. Permanent BMP's must be proposed to fulfill stonnwater management
requirements. MCWD encourages you to implement ston-nwater
management regimes which allow for the infiltration of precipitation and
stormwater runoff into the ground. Please consult the "Minnesota Urban
Small Sites BMP Manual" on the MCWD website at
www.minnehahacreek.org for ideas on suitable BMP's for your project
3. This site most likely requires runoff rate control: submit runoff rates for
existing and proposed conditions for 1, 10, and 100-year storm events. If the
runoffrate of the proposed conditions exceed the existing site conditions for
major rain events, measures will be required to be in place to limit the rate of
runoff to that of the existing conditions.
4. This site may require water quality control: measures must be in place to
treat stormwater runoff in order to remove 50% of the phosphorus present in
the runoff
5. Additional BMP's are required above and beyond measures taken to fulfill
runoff rate and water quality requirements
As we review your submittals, we may find the need to request additional
information, and will so inform you. If you have any questions please call me at
(952) 471-0590.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Wyatt
District Technician
-3545-
COMBINED JOINT NOTIFICATION FORM - WATER RESOURCE APPLICATION appl
Use this fom~ to notify/apply to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), their engineering consultants, the
DNR, and the Hennepin Conservation District ora proposed water/wetland project or work which may fall within their
jurisdiction. These agencies should advise you of their jurisdiction or permit requirements within 10 days. Fill out this
form completely and mail a copy, with plan, maps, etc.., to the MCWD, Gray Freshwater Center, Navarre, 2500
Shadywood Road, Suite 37, Excelsior, MN 55331. Keep a copy for your records. YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL
REQUIRED AUTHORIZATIONS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK.
1. Applicant's Name (Last, First, M.I.) Phone No.
Address (Street, RFD, Box #, City, State, Zip)
2. Location of proposed project (Attach drawing w/directions to site):
COUNTY QTR SECTION(s) SECTION(s) TOWNSHIP(s) RANGE(s) Lot, Block, Subdivision
PROJECT ADDRESS: CITY:
3. LENGTH OF SHORE AFFECTED (in feet): VOLUME OF FILL OR EXCAVATION (Cubic yards):
AREA FILLED OR EXCAVATED IS Acres, OR Square Feet.
4. TYPE OF PERMIT BEING APPLIED FOR: (Check all that apply):
[] STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN [] FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION
[-]SHORELINE IMPROVEMENT
a.~-]RIPRAP
b.[~ SANDBLANKET
c.[-]RETAINING WALL
[-']STORM SEWER OUTFALLS
I--lICE RIDGE REMOVAL
[--]BRIDGE & CULVERT CROSSINGS
[] WETLAND ALTERATION
[] EXCAVATION (DREDGING)
a.[-'] WILDLIFE
b.[] NAVIGATION
c.[-'l BIOENGINEERING
OTHER (DESCRIBE)
4a. APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: (Licensed Contractor, Engineer, etc...) Include name, address & phone number.
5. PROJECT PURPOSE (why is this project needed - what benefits will it provide?)
6. ALTERNATIVES (describe any other sites or methods that could be used to achieve the purpose of your project while avoiding or
minimizing water/wetland impacts. Attach additional sheets, if needed.
7. DATES: Proposed start of activity: Proposed completion:
(Identify any completed work on attached drawing)
8. NAMES & ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS (Attach list if more)
9. PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED (R) OR APPLIED FOR (A) FROM: DNR__ ARMY CORPS OF ENGR
COUNTY CITY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
1 hereby notify the recipients of this form of the project proposed herein and request I be advised of any permits or other determinations
concerning this project that I must obtain. I understand that proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may be
subject to Federal, State and/or local administrative, civil and/or criminal penalties.
-3546-
Butler Square Bldg, Ste 710C, 100 N 6th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55403-1505 612.758.6700
architecture · engineering environmental
Development Application
Review Submittal
612.758.6701 FAX
transportation
TO: Mound Planning Commission/City Council
FROM: Miles Britz, AIA; SEH Inc.
DATE: June 28, 2002
SUBdECT: Proposed Mound Public Safety Building
Fire/Police Facility
OWNER: City of Mound
CASE NUMBER:
SEH FILE NUMBER: A-MONCI0201.02
LOCATION: Wilshire Blvd. ,And Maywood Road
ZONING: R-1 Residential with CUP
BACKGROUND: The City of Mound is the Owner of the property currently occupied
by City Hall and the Mound Fire Hall. The existing Fire Hall is proposed to be
demolished and replaced with a new combination Fire/Police Mound Public Safety
Building.
This application is to determine an approval process for granting a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) in order to construct a Public Building on a zoned R-1 Residential District.
Also to examine two (2) requested variances.
Variance 1 requests a Hardcover Surface of 51%, in lieu of the zoned 40% maximum
cover. Variance 2 requests a Building Height of 60'-0" for the Hose Tower in lieu of the
zoned 35'-0".
The site area is 176,565 Sq. Ft., which includes the existing City Hall, existing Fire Hall
and related driveways and parking. The proposed Mound Public Safety Building will be
located at the current Fire Hall site, The proposed building has a footprint of 20,157 Sq.
Ft. as it sits on the site, approximately 2 Y2 times larger than the existing Fire Hall
footprint.
The front of the building fronts on both Wilshire Blvd. and Maywood Road. Maywood
Road will be the Primary Front Yard with Wilshire as the Secondary Front Yard. The
current R-1 zoning setbacks require 30' at front yardS, I0' at Side yardS, and 15' at rear
yards. This proposed building meets all setback requirements, with both Front Yards, side
and rear setbacks.
The hardcover surface of maximum site coverage is limited to 40% of the site as zoned
R-1. The proposed site layout of City Hall, proposed Public Safety Building, parking and
drives calculate to 51% hardsurface coverage. This is an 11% overage of hardsurface and
will require a variance to accomplish. The existing sloped topography and requirement
Short EIliott Hendrickson Inc.
Your Trusted Resource
-3547-
Equal Opportunity Employer
for a Stormwater Runoff Detention Pond by the Minnehaha Water Shed District make
this a very challenging site.
The exterior materials for the Proposed Public Safety Building will be primarily Precast
Concrete insulated wall panels. The PC wall panels will be treated with cast in reveals to
create "jointing" and shadow relief elements. Various portions of the PC panels will be
also treated with differing textures such as "sand-blasted" and "acid-etched", creating the
appearance of stacking different stone materials.
As an add alternate, sunscreens and a sloped roof edge treatment are proposed. In
addition, metal grille work located above door openings and horizontal banding along
with the slope, d roof edge will help create the "Lakefront Resort" image. Depending on
construction bid results, these various elements of sunscreens; sloped roof edge or metal
grille work may be added to the project to enhance the overall image of the proposed
building. Exterior Elevations A4-B & A5-B are the Base Bid, while Elevations A4-A &
A5-A are the Add Alternate Bid.
-3548-
Application for
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 952-472-0607, Fax: 952-472-0620
Planning Commission. Date: 07/15/02
City Council Date:
Case No.
Conditional Use Permit Fee: $350.00~
Distribution:
City Planner: Public Works: Fire Dept.
City Engineer: Parks: Other:
Please type or print the following information: .
PROPERTY Subject
INFORMATION Address '2~415 Wilshire Blvd., ~Mound, PJlq 55364
Na~neof Business Mourzd Public Safety 'Building - ~ire/Police
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION Lot 9. 1'0. 11 ,. '12, 13 ' Block 3 Plat# lq/A
Subdivision .fih'{~-I ~7 R'i'l 1 ~ ]ln'i t' 1~ PID~ ?&-]'l 7-242]0034
APPLICANT The appli, cant is: '~ owner other:
Name gity. of Mound
Address 5341 Mayw60d Road, Mound; MN 55364
Phone(H) ON) q52.472. 0600 (M)
Name
OWNER
(if other than Address (.Same as Ab6Ve)
applicant)
Phone (H) ON) (M)
Name Short Eliott Hendrickson Inc.
ARCHrrECT, Butler squaze 'Building, Suite 710C'
ENGINEER
· Phone {H). ~0/V} ~12.758. 6755 (M)
ZONING Circle: R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
DISTRICT
CHANGE OF FROM: R-1 Single ?amilv Residential
USE
TO: ~'! Residential with Public Buildfnff thru CUP
Revised 04/19/02
-3549-
Conditional Use Permit Application
Page 2
Description 0fProposed Use: The existing Public Building 'Fire Station :to ..be
demolished and replaced with a new Public Building
~ld~n~ for hn~h.~he Mmmd P~h]~c Safety Building;
fo~:,rthe Mound Public-Safety'
housing both Fire Department
and Police Department.
F. ". ' t'..' '~i ,'.'~
EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity,
including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate
or eliminate the impacts.
There will be no charge or added impact, to the. property. The Mound. Fire
Department and Police Department are currently located on this site.
If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees
for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project:
$ 4,800,000.00
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? ( ) yes,~ )no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and
provide copies of resolutions.
This application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or an explanation given why this is not
the case.
Print Applicant's Name
Applicant's Signature
Date
Print Owner's Name
Owner's Signature
Date
Print Owner's Name
Owner's Signature
Date
Revised 04/19/02
-3550-
City of Mound
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Planning Commission Date.
City Council Date
~11~ y 15~ 2007
July 23, 2002
Application
Case No.
City Planner DNR
City Engineer PARKS
Pul:ilic Works Other
Please type or print legibly
Fee: $200.00
SUBJECT Address 2415 Wilshire Blvd., Mound, MN 55364
PROPERTY
LEGAL Lot q. ]o. ]]. ]2. ]~ Block 3
DESC.
Subdivision Shirley Hill Unit D
PID # 24-117-24210034 Plat# N/A
ZONING DISTRICT ~,,.~-1~ R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
PROPERTY Name City of Mound
OWNER
Address 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone (H),. (W) 952. 472.0600 (M)
APPLICANT Name. City of Mound
(IF OTHER
Address (SamP,)
THAN
OWNER)
Phone (H). .(W). .(M)
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? Yes ( ) No (×). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
prnpn~H n~w P,~l~r h~lding -Mn-nd P~lhl~r gmf~y B~ld~nE to house Moupd
Fire and Police Departments. The existing Fire Hall will be demolished and replaced
with the proposed
Variance Application
Page 1 of 3
Revised 03/20/02
new building.
-3551 -
Case No.
3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setbaCk regulations for ti~e zoning
distdct in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (×). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
The proposed Public Safety Building requires a height variance from 35' to
A' proposed two & thre.e story building to maximize site vehicle parking, green space
and stormwater detention pond.
SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCF::
(or existing)
Front Yard: 30 ft. 30 ' N/A
Secondary
Side Yard: ] D ft. ~0' N/A
Side Yard: 10 ft. 128' N/A
Rear Yard: 15 ft. 15 ' N/A
Lakeside:
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
N/A ft.
ft.
Street Frontage: 6O ft. 3 ! 6_ 8
Lot Size: 10,000 sq ft 176,565
Hardcover: 70: 626 sq ft 87,149
ft. ft.
fl. ft.
ft. ft.
N/A ft. N/A ft.
ff. ft.
ft. N/A ft.
sq ff N/A _sq ft
sq ft 16,523 _sq ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes (), No (x). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
ThC 'ln~- 4~ zmned R-] ging]¢ Family Ra,~dmnt~al. The intent is to replace an existing
Public Building with a new Public Building thru a Conditional Use Permit.
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage (x) existing situation
( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe; The existing property is owned by a Public Governmental Agency, the
City of Mound. The existinR Fire Hall and City Hall both 'reside on this property.
At this time;: it would be impractible to allow this parcel to be utilized as R-.1
Single Family Housing.
Variance Application
Page 2 of 3
Revised 03/20/02
-3552-
Case No.
6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~). If yes, explain:
7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes (), No (×). If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in
this petition? Yes (), No (×). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
Requesting a Height variance - Public Building,at Hose To~Ler, 60'-~"
Requesting a Hardcover variance - Public Building with parking and Fire Truck drive lanes.
required for Fire Truck manueverability and on-site parking. The'height variance is
requested to permit a two and three story Public Building, allowing for vehicle
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by law.
Owner's Signature
Date
Applicant's Signature
Prepared .b¥..SEH Inc.
Vadance AppliCation
Page 3 of 3
Revised 03/20/02
on behalf of City of Mound.
-3553-
Date
CITY OF MOUND'
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
(tMPF..P, VIOU,~ ,BURFACF_
S__S: 2.4__15 W__il_.s. hir.e. Blvd..., .M__ou_n_d, ~ 5.5.364
OWNER'S NAME: City of Mound - Public Safety Building
LOT AREA 176,565
LOT AREA 176,565
LOT AREA
SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) N/A
SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) .............................
SQ. FT. X 1 5% = (for detached buildings only) ..................
[ 5~297 S.F.
[ 70,626
LNIA
* Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd.
6.B.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official.
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
HCYdM~ × =
Proposed Public
Safety Building 214' X 94.19' = 20,157 S.F.
Existing
City Hall 133' X 46.57' = 6,194 S.F.
DETACHED BUILDINGS
(GARAGE/SHED)
TOTAL HOUSE ....................................................
N/A X =
X =
26,351 S,F.
DRIVEWAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ...............................
X =
X =
N/A
DECKS Open decks (1/4" min.
Opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are not
counted as hardcover.
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................
N/A X =
X =
X =
TOTAL DECK .......................................................
60,798 S.F.
N/A
TOTAL OTHER ....... NOAg ......................................
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ........................................... .5.~...
OVER (indicate difference) ............................................................ .1..17.....
PREPARED BY Short Eliott Hendrickson Inc.
Revised 03120/02 Mpls., MN 55436
I
I
DATE
N/A
87,149 S.F.
16,523
06'/28/02
-3554-
/
/
/
/
/
/
/'
/
X
o
CYPRESS LANE
30.0
:
il "-~---~ ' :. ' ' ~ [I
-...~ ~ ._ z~ ~
}~ ~ i = =--.-~a=~._. WlLSH,.~E BL VD.
iii.
I ,,/
~RESS LANE
6'
.o
276,6
/
/
I
t
/
/
/
1
-K
0
\ o
./
CYPRESS LANE
LAYOUT / I mo, r=m .c~ ' I /
/I osa,:~,,,~ ev T. LUGER Il
/ I ~"~ "''' T. LUOER I /
POLICE / FI~JE
/,
1
i ,"
/if,/.
/ / (
/ ,
/
I
!
I
I
/
!
/
/
//
X
?
/
~-. } PRE.-.,o L A NE
!
li ' ]
.J
/
/
I
i
I
/
I
C ~'Pf~E.SS L A NE
'W 6'
iI
/
/ /
/
!/ (
It
/
/
r-
C'Yf~RE:~ LANE
T
II II SITE PLANTIN
PLAN MOUNI~
I~!
~ ~ ~ , ~ ,-~' ,, · ........ ~ ...... ~'S '
~ C" '."' '~ :
II ~ ~ m - z , ~ m
- [[ ~ ~
I I ' " ~ POLICE WOMBS LOCKER ~ POLICE MEN5 LOCKER
~ IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIllllll
·,i I
'"'" ~ I "*"" I
L
I
I
I
FII~JE / POLICE
$T,4TION
MOUND, MI~OTA
ZODgC I BOAT ~8 RESCUE t19
F-TROOP GAMA GOAT 27 ~DDER TRUCK ~
L J ~ ,
3RD PUMPER ¢18 SALSBURY PUMPER ~
TA'KER ~5 2HD PUMPER ~
~ ~ 0
O O
rtl
--;O mO
0
o
' II ,. ,, II FLOOR PLAN / I ".~ ~^~ ~' ~'~ ~'" I I
f~ LEVEL o~aaNm .¥ .
~ I1~ - I/ //~ -I1~ ~
'i
o o
STATION
M~P, MInOlTA
MOUN~ I~J~LI~
CITY C~ MOLJNI:) JL "'
'il
/FIf~E / POLICE
/ 5T,~,TION
MOUND PUBLIC :SAFETY FACILITY
PROJECT SCHEDULE
TASK NAME
FINISH DATE
1. Design & Engineering
Design Development
8/112002
2. Bidding & Procurement
Grading / Utilities / Demolition
Contracts Awarded
911112002
3. Construction
Start Construction
Demolition of Existing Structure
101412002
4. Footings, Foundation, Building
Shell, M/E
Contracts Awarded
1011412002
5. Construction
Mechanical, Electrical Rough-ins
3120/2003
6. Finishes, Landscaping
Contracts Awarded
121312002
7. Building Completion
Finishes
6~6~2003
-3570-
CtT~ OF MOUND
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 07/0102
Date p/fnted 07/16/02
The meeting was convened at 4:30 PM Monday, July 1, 2002 at Mound Fire Station:
Present:
Greg Pederson Mound Fire GP
Todd Christopherson Amcon TC
Matt Simoneau Building Off. MS
Kandis Hanson City KH
Greg Palm City Gpalm
Tim Palm City TP
Miles Britz SEH MB
John McKinley City JM
Jeff Anderson City JA
Len Harrell City LH
John Cameron MFRA JC
Jim Strommen Kennedy/Graven
Bob City Council
JS
1. GP updated on status of lease space. Ongoing.
2. MB updated on plans. Site plans are about 90% completed. The building plans are at a point where schematic
design is completed. Just starting Design/Development phase. Design will continue refining layouts.
3, Planning Commission will review the submittal on 7/15. Submittal was made on Friday last week.
4. GP updated the triangle piece of property. The property is sold. GP has name of buyer and will contact. This
piece of ground will allow a better parking solution for emergency response vehicles.
5. Control panels will be moved from the Well on 9/16. It is available for demo after that date. The control panel
will be moved into City Hall.
JC indicated that the estimate from Xcel is about $10,000 per pole span. Based on 6 spans, it is estimated at
$60,000. The budget includes about $50,000 for the work. This is primarily a safety issue, however, it also an
aesthetic concern. There is a desire to lower them also from the perspective of downtown redevelopment being
asked to do the same.
JS reviewed Xcel policies for burying lines. The standard is overhead; Excel will generally move those at no
cost. Going to buded is considered an upgrade. The public safety issue may allow this to be absorbed by Xcel.
The PUC would make the ultimate decision. TC said that we would like to have the work done this fall based on
the project schedule.
8. JS said we could proceed with having the work done in a timely manner, independent of knowing whether or not
the costs would be absorbed by Xcel or the City.
9. JS said there is another similar request underway for the downtown redevelopment. This may be detrimental, as
they may be less likely to approve to such requests for one entity (Mound.)
10. JS suggested having someone that is very familiar with utility company layout and power issues handle the
application to the PUC. SEH electrical engineer, Glenn Eisenbrandt may be a good candidate.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet'Files\Content. lE5\RDERST6VWIPS 07 01 02.doc
-3571 -
Meeting held on 07/0102
Date printed 07/~ 6/02
CITY OF MOUND
11. TC to send site plans to all of applicable utility companies as normal procedure and request that they design and
schedule the services for the new building. This process is independent of the request for Xcel to absorb the
bury costs.
12. The monitoring wells were discussed. Braun has contacted the City to get more background information on
them. TC has directed Braun to contact GME to get the information as they did the work for the City originally.
13. TC reported project on schedule. Amcon is working on cost estimates and requested that SEH provide two sets
of large-scale plans.
14. GP reported that the interest rate on the bond was about .5% lower than anticipated. This results in significant
cost savings over the life of the bond.
15. TC to be at the 7/23 meeting with SEH for Council site plan approval. This is in lieu of the 7/9 meeting already
advertised. This was agreed by all since there is not a lot of news to update the Council with since last update.
The project is tracking on schedule and budget and plans are in the submittal process for planning and Council
approval.
16. Site title - no news on this item.
17. Communications - KH and Bonnie are working with J Schultz. Probable publication date is mid August.
18. Land use approval items are tracking well. Submittal was made for planning approval.
19. Next meeting is 7/8 at 4:30 to 5:30. 5:30 is Design meeting same day.
20. The tracking meeting ended at 5:45. Scott Alden and Greg Palm joined the group and John Cameron and Jim
Strommen left.
21. MB and SB reviewed the site plan.
22.
KH requested that GP take the plan to Mediacom across the street to review the plans and on street parking so
that they can plan in advance changes to their operations. They are currently staging in the street and will not be
able to do so once the project is started. Construction activities will require parking on Maywood.
23. SEH needs to move full speed with Design/Development plans. The schedule does not allow SEH to wait for
planning and Council approval prior to starting DD. SEH will move full speed as planned with the assumption
that City approval process will lead to little or no minor modifications.
24. TC commended SEH for making the building envelope extremely efficient. At this point, any cost savings will
need to be in reduced level of finishes inside and/or on exterior surfaces.
25. Discussed bid altemates.
26. The upcoming design meetings will start to focus on finishes and owner requirements for mechanical and
electrical services in each space.
27. Meeting adjourned at 7 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content. IE5\RDERST6V~IPS 07 01 02.doc
-3572-
Page 2 of 2
CtTYOF ~
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 07/08/02
Date printed 07/16/02
The meeting was convened at 4:30 PM Monday, July 8, 2002 at Mound Fire Station:
Present:
Greg Pederson Mound Fire GP
Todd Christopherson Amcon TC
Matt Simoneau Building Off. MS
Greg Palm City Gpalm
Tim Palm City TP
Scott Alden City SA
Miles Britz SEH MB
John McKinley City JM
Jeff Anderson City J^
Len Harrell City LH
Bob Brown City Council BB
GP updated on status of lease space. Ongoing. No problems anticipated. GP will propose that they keep one
or two trucks in the loading area. The entire area is not available since it would preclude the landlord from
getting other tenants into the building. John Cameron has worked on a sketch of the ramp that will be needed,
2. MB gave update on plan status. There will be some design meetings with staff planned with M/E engineers to
review services, etc. ^ request for full size plans was made by GP for public works and other staff review.
3. BB requested a larger water main to the building than the 6" shown. MB indicated that the Mechanical engineers
will be looking into this and will analyze this.
4. Discussed key schedule dates. BP 1 will go to printer on 8/9. Construction start scheduled for 9/16.
Discussed planning commission review. Comments have been received from Watershed District. SS identified
concerns about wetland location, since the property is all under one PID. If the Fire Station parcel is not
subdivided, then wetland issues may come into play. SS not sure whether it will be subdivided at this point - she
is talking with Prosser and with City Attorney office. SS to follow through with MCWD to see if a meeting can be
set up with them to review permitting authority options. SEH to review the MCWD letter as relates to civil design.
6. GP said 2 of 5 member cities have signed on with agreements. GP is working on with Mayor. Project will
proceed regardless.
MB has the design standards developed by HKGI for the downtown redevelopment. MB asked what
components of this are desired for the fire station - most of what is show does not fit with the fire station project.
SS stated that much of what is shown in HGKI documents is geared toward pedestrian traffic- pavers, etc. All
agreed that we should try to incorporate some of the ideas and details.
8. TC to get bids on asbestos removal. MAVO, Asbestrol, and Laborer's local union. The Braun reports identify
asbestos in pipe coverings, ceiling tiles, and transite panels.
9. Site title to be transferred tomorrow at Council meeting.
10. News release to be held until it is known whether or not Orono is in.
11. Phase I environmental is done. TC to talk with Braun about monitoring wells - can they be taken out now?
C:\WlNDOWS\Temporary Intemet Files\Content. IE5~RDERST6V~IPS 07 08 02.doc
-3573-
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF MOUND
12. Meetings for this committee to be same time, same place for next two weeks.
13. GP, MS, and Gpalm will meet on Wednesday at 4:15 to tour temporary facility.
Meeting held on 07/08/02
Date printed 07/16/02
SS left at this point. Several fire fighters joined the meeting to review plans prior to their training class at 6 PM.
14. A single stall, unisex toilet room to be added adjacent to the washer/dryer area on the main floor of the apparatus
bay.
15. SB walked through the plans for those present.
16. MS questioned the access of the mechanical room through the locker room. SEH to verify.
17. MS questioned the need for a second egress from the electrical room, depending on the size of the electrical
service. SEH to verify.
18. The lower level mechanical room will not have combustion equipment, just water service and riser. The fire
marshal should look into issues related to a basement location for the riser equipment.
19. SB to schedule a preliminary meeting with health department to review kitchen plans.
20. Pipe bollards added at all exterior door openings for protection. These will be steel pipes set in concrete and
filled with concrete.
21. Bunker gear will be on rolling carts. This way they can be moved later if necessary.
22. The mezzanine will have a sliding gate to allow forklift access of materials.
23. Talked about wall types. Block (CMU) is better for sound and durability, however, limits future flexibility and
costs more. Identified areas in each level that should be block and which walls should be metal stud, drywall.
The stud walls, where used, should incorporate soundproofing as necessary.
24. MB suggested upgraded finishes in the lobby, such as burnish block. This could be sand or concrete filled below
the counters for security as discussed previously.
25. Discussed floor finish for the apparatus bay. There are a number of options and a range of cost. It was decided
to identify two options and have one as a bid alternate add.
26. Discussed painting of intedor walls and ceiling of apparatus bay.
27. We will schedule the mechanical engineer to come to discuss drainage and exhaust issues in the apparatus bay.
28. MB reviewed the two extedor elevations. One will be base bid, and the fancier one will be an add alternate.
29. Discussed glass colors. It is desirable to use blue to fit with Mound and water themes; however, cost is an issue
as this is more than clear or bronze tints.
30. Discussed roof access for training. The areas should be minimized and identified, so that roof design does not
get over complicated.
31. Meeting adjourned at 7 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content. IE5\RDERST6V~IPS 07 08 02.doc
-3574-
Page 2 of 2
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 07/15/02
Date p~nted 07/16/02
The meeting was convened at 4:30 PM Monday, July 15, 2002 at Mound Fire Station:
Present:
Greg Pederson Mound Fire GP
Todd Christopherson Amcon TC
Matt Simoneau Building Off. MS
Greg Palm City Gpalm
Tim Palm City TP
Scott Alden City SA
Miles Britz SEH MB
John McKinley City JM
Jeff Anderson City JA
GP updated on status of lease space. TC is working on bids for temporary office trailers for the FD staff. This is
in lieu of building out office space within the building. Plans are to have a security fence so that other tenants do
not have access to the apparatus. GP reviewed the lease requirements - access to the existing toilets on the
east side of the building, temporary use of the South indoor docks, etc.
2. MS - mentioned that FEMA might have a program that provides such trailers. PG to investigate.
3. Training will be done within the same space as the apparatus bay. The Council chambers in City Hall may also
be available every other Monday.
4. KH said that the Council will be walking through the City Hall on the 7/22 meeting to review existing conditions
and to discuss the ideas for improving the building after the police department moves out.
5. MB handed out color photos of examples of precast, glass, overhead doors, and bollards.
6. The color scheme envisioned is beige, limestone color.
7. Next week's meeting is to review electrical requirements. The following week will be mechanical systems.
8. JM is setting up a meeting to review the holding cells and other detention issues with a representative of the
Department of Corrections. He will attempt to get him here on 7/22 so that he can interface with electrical.
9. Managing Construction project - TC updated committee on status. Everything is on schedule.
10. Meeting with MCWD is Thursday at 1 PM. SS is working with Wenck and they are still thinking that a buffer is
required. August 8 meeting of their Board is scheduled. SEH will have their Civil Engineer at the meeting.
11. SS reviewed the site plan options that had been developed by HKGI. SEH has reviewed this option and finds no
problem with it. The new plan would save some trees that would be lost in the current SEH plan. TC asked if
making the change would impact the schedule - MB says to defer that question for Sam's review since he is
more closely involved in the decision making process.
12. SS discussed the proposed rainwater garden. There is an example of this in Wayzata on both sides of 16. They
act as a filter and also slow down the runoff.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content. IE5~O, DERST6V~vlPS 07 15 02.doc
-3575-
Page 1 of 3
Meeting held on 07/15/02
Date p/fnted 07/16/02
CITY OF MOUND
13. TC suggested a tree expert that could identify which trees should be saved near the front entry. The remaining
trees and shrubs should be cleared out ASAP so that proposed retaining walls and drives could be staked out.
This will assist with identifying any potential conflicts there prior to construction.
14.
GP is working with the new buyer of the adjacent home. They are reluctant to sell the entire triangle of property,
however, seem open to selling a smaller portion to help with the parking. SS said a fence would be required
behind the retaining wall to screen the parking from the residential. The fence would also be necessary for
safety.
15. Schedule- TC updated. The council meeting for September is Monday, 9/9. Bids will be opened on
Wednesday, 9/4. Tabulation and recommendations will go to KH by Thursday, 9/5.
16.
Demolition was discussed. GP has a list of items in the building that will be salvaged. TC asked that the list
include who will remove - contractor or owner. SEH will include this info on bid documents. Any items of value
should left for demo unless owner has a specific use for them. The salvage value of those items will be reflected
in a lower bid from the demolition contractors.
17. KH updated on committee on financial control.
18. Underground electrical utilities - no update on work being done by Strommen. SS said that Strommen needs
more time for additional research and should have information in a couple weeks.
19. GP to communicate with Mediacom.
20.
SB discussed the new site plan proposal. He has worked with Brad at SEH to review and update their plan to
reflect the proposed changes. It was agreed that the new plan would be used, except that the new entry drive
will be moved west to align with the existing Cypress Street. This will make the drive a little steeper grade;
however, the alignment and the straighter drive will offset this.
21.
SS reviewed the title issues. Since the improvements are primarily on lot 9, this lot will be used with the bond. In
the event of default, the bondholders would take title to lot 9 and improvements. This will be simpler than doing a
new lot line.
22.
KH updated the newsletter and publicity issues. They will wait until more information is available relative to
which cities are in and out. This way accurate info will go out. The good news in the newsletter will be the $1.5
million saved by getting the Iow point in bond interest market. KH also asked that photos be taken regularly from
the same point to create an historical record of the existing and construction activity.
23. Planning Commission meeting is tonight. MB, SS, GP to attend.
24. Meeting next week 7/22 and 7/29 - same time and same place.
25. Asbestos removal bids received. Low bid is $3,615.
26. TC to follow up with status of test well removal/relocation.
Design meeting ended. Tim Palm, Greg Palm, and Scott Alden joined at this point for the design meeting.
27. SB reviewed the process for color selections for exterior elements.
28. The colors for the exterior precast will be presented in actual samples next week. The committee agreed to look
at samples in the limestone color family similar to a picture shown.
C:\WlNDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content.lE5~O, DERST6V'~vlPS 07 15 02.doc
-3576-
Page 2 of 3
Meeting held on 07/15/02
Date printed 07/16/02
~ OF MOUN~
29. TC recommended using clear anodized aluminum trim for windows, sun shades, and other exterior elements for
lower initial cost, lower long term cost, and for ease of matching materials from multiple vendors. The roof metal
would be looked at as a color accent metal - possibly bronze, red, blue, etc.
30. SB felt that green or blue tinted glass would look good with the dear aluminum trim and the precast colors
considered.
31. SB reviewed proposed drop locations in apparatus bay for electrical and air.
32.
Discussed water drops for filing the tanker. The existing tanker has a rear connection; most new ones are top
fills. The tanker will be filled in the wash bay typically. There will be two drops in the wash bay for 4" water fill
lines.
33. In the apparatus bay, there will be 1.5" water connections for general wash down of floors
34. Meeting adjourned at 7:15 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy.
C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\Content. IE5\RDERST6V~IPS 07 15 02.doc
-3577-
Page 3 of 3
Mound Public Safety Facility 07/1812002
Mound, MN
Funding Source
Lease Revenue bond Sale Project Funds
HRA Contingency
Water fund bond Proceeds
Expenditures
Pro_iect Develo_oment Costa A/E Base Fee
A/E Reimbursables
Scope Change Contingency
Land Costs
Legal Fees/Non Bond
Financing Costs/Non Bond
Soft Cost - Miscellaneous to date
City Road & Utility Fees (SAC)
Public Utility charges
Geotechnical/Environmental Services
Surveying
Bid Advertisement and Printing
Lease Cost of Temporary Facility
Moving Costs (two moves)
Construction Testing
Furnishings and Eauioment
FFE
Audio visual Systems
Security and Access Systems
Telephone System
Computer Network
Budget Work Sheet
July-02
Schematic Budget
Estimate
Total
I
Budget
5,350,000 Ehlers/City
500,000 Ehlers/City
Ehlers/City
5,850,0001
SEH
SEH
SEH
City of Mound
Kennedy/Graven
Miscellaneous
MCES
Excel
Braun
MFRA
To be Bid
In Construction Cost
Sub-totals
371,250 SEH
30,500 SEH
50,000 SEH
0 City
2,000 Kennedy Graven
3,000 Ehlers
48,832 City of Mound - Geno
2,4OO City
50,000 MFRAJAmcon
8,300 Amcon
8,000 City
30,000 Amcon
47,880 City
15,100 City
0 Amcon
667,262
Owner
To be bid
To be bid
To be bid
To be bid
132,000 City
8,500 City
14,400 City
17,200 City
3,700 City
Sub-totals
175,800
Construction Cost
Building Hard Costs
Construction Manager Fee
Site Improvements
Demolition of Existing
Removal of Well
New (replacement well)
Contingency/Bidding & Construction
Recommended Alternates
Uncommited Funds
Contractors (to be bid)
Amcon CM
Included in Building
To be bid
Included in Demolition
NOT included in project
Sub-totals
Totals
(Fund Shortage)
4,218,438 Amcon
128,500 Amcon
0 Amcon
60,000 Amcon
0 City/Amcon
0 city
500,000 Amcon
100,000 Amcon
5,006,938
$$,850,000
AMCON
-3578-
cost est MPS 7 18.xls
Total Project Cost
#02-1 ] 3030 Il. 7) l"ariat~ce
Ci.tiv Co~.cil
.]u6, 17, 2002
CORRESPONDENCE
Upon the submittal of' thc applicant's plans, City Staff forwarded copies and the July I letter to Greg and
Kathy Fall requesting that if they had any comments, to submit them by July 15~ in advance of the Council
meeting. The City received a letter from Karl Yeager, legal council for Greg and Kathy Fall on July 15, 2002.
The letter has essentially two objections: 1) Staff has interpreted the Code incorrectly: and 2) The matter
should be referred to the Planning Commission to further review the setback of stairs.
Staffs response and comments to the letter are as follows:
It is Staffs interpretation that Section 350:440 Subd. 3. (B) would allow stairs to be within 2 feet of
a property linc as part of an entrance structm'e or means of providing other types of access. Typical
situations where stairs might be within 2 Feet or within a required y:ard:
· Side entrances to homes
· Front entrx~ stairs that are within a front yard setback
· Stairs leading to decks
· Stairs leading to porches
· Stairs on bluffs/steep slopes
The reference to the zoning code section 350:440 Subd. 3. (F) regarding fire escapes is inaccurate.
The section states, "Fire escapes not exceeding three (3)./bet in width in .wde or rear )'ardx on/y. "
The letter contains the statement that fire escapes must be at least three feet from thc property line.
That is an inaccuratc interpretation. This section is simply.' states that if a fire escape is in the side or
rear yard setback area, the stairs, ladder, or other escape system is limited to a 3 feet width.
Therefore, referenced item (F) does not establish a higher standard for other code provisions.
The stairs leading to the deck surface are not considered a "fire escape" although they could serve
this purpose. Building and fire codes designate when fire escapes are necessaD:. It should also be
noted that a deck does not necessarily need a stairway.
The applicant contacted City Staff on the morning of July 18th and expressed their ilatentions of submitting a
letter requesting the variance be withdrawn fi'om consideration and further action. As of the time of writing
of this report, the letter had not been submitted If thc applicant does submit a letter prior to or during
Tuesday's City Council meeting, then action on the proposed Resolution is not necessary.
Given the concerns stated on the July 15, 2002 letter fi'om Karl Yeager, the Council should discuss and
deternaine if Staff has correctly interpreted the relevant /.oning code sections. From StafCs perspective,
action by the Council is needed on the 2 sections noted below. The Council should determine if the Staff
interpretation of each section is correct or if not. what it should be.
Prior to taking action on these sections, the Council should first determine if thc stairs and deck are separate
in terms of applicable setback requirements. In other words, are the stairs subject to the same setback
requirements as the deck structure or do other code provisions treat stairs diffcrcntlx.
Staff interpretation the relationship of decks and stairs - Thc conclusion reached regarding
1,.~ North Third Street, Suite 100. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338~0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3580-
MEMORANDUM
Hoisington Koegler Group lnc.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mound City Council and Staff
Loren Gordon, AICP
July 16, 2002
PC Case #02- 11, 3030 Island View Drive - Variance Request
BACKGROUND
The Cit-5, Council reviewed this case at the Ma3.' 28, 2002 meeting, at which time the case was tabled for
further review. Staff sent a notice to the applicants, John and Kathy Aquitina, stating the City would be using
its authority under Minnesota State Statute 15.99 to extend the review period for up to an additional 60 days.
That review period will end July 30. 2002.
At that meeting, tile City' Council directed Staff to work with the applicant Lo rcvisc tiao deck plans ill a
manner consistent and ill conformance with the City Code. Since that time, Staff has meet with and reviewed
a number of ideas and a few iterations of plans.
UPDATED PLANS
Included in 3'our packet material is all updated deck plan submitted to tile City on June 27, 2002 by the
applicant. The plan illustrates plan and elevation views of tile proposed deck modifications. As proposed,
the deck would be cutoff at the south wall of the house. This would allow the deck to meet a 6 feet sid%,ard
setback as measured at its southeast corner.
The stairway is in tile same location in tile sideyard, but has two longer stairs or what the plan indicates as
"landings." The plan indicates the southeast comer o£ the stairs will be 2 feet from the property line.
Staff has reviewed tile plan and rendered an admmistrativc approval. The applicant has not yet submitted a
building permit application but it is StafFs understanding that architectural plans will be submitted soon.
Formal approval will occur upon issuance of the building pemlit assuming that the City Council agrees that
the plan now satisfies building and zoning codes. Staff has determined that the stairs qualil? as an acceptable
encroachment under Section 350:440 Subd. 3 (C). Findings to support our interpretations are as follows:
1. There is a clear distinction between tile deck surface and the stairway sx,'stem.
2. The top step or "2® landing" is at a different elevation than the deck surt'acc which distinguishes it
from being considered as deck snrface.
3. Tile "landings" arc an integral part of the stairway system ill providing access to tile deck and yard.
4. Tile "landings" arc considcrcd part of the stair system according to tile Uniform Bnilding Code.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338~1~8!)0 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3579-
,t~. 3
#02-1! 30301FD l'aric~nce
City Council Memorandum
duly ] 7, 2002
Subd 3 (B) below supports Staff's interpretation that steps/stairs are separate from the deck
in terms of applicable setbacks. Steps/stairs are allowed within any yardspace as long as
they are at least 2 feet fi'om a lot line.
Section 350:440 Subd. 3 (B) Uncovered Dorches, stoops or similar enlrance slruciures nol
exceeding 32 sq~tare./bet which do not extend m elevation above the height qf'the ground.floor
elevation of the principal building, and steps ~hctt do not extend to a distance of less than na:o (2)
feet.fi'om any lol line.
Staff interpretation regarding steps - Steps can be within 2 feet of any lot line when a part of
an entrance structure or when needed for other purposes.
Section 350:440 Subd. 3 (F) Fire e.¥cctpe.s' no~ exceeding three (3)./~,e~ in ~4,idth in .s'ide or rear
yards' on(v.
Staff interpretation regarding fire escapes - 3 feet refers to the width of tile fire escape itselh
not thc setback distance of the fire escape in relation to the side or rear lot line.
RECOMMENDATION
It is Staff's recommendation that the City Council take thc following actions:
1. Adopt tile proposed Resolution which adopts tile conclusions and material contained in this
menlorandum is correct.
2. Adopt tile proposed Resolution for denial of tile applicant's request for a deck setback va,'iance if a
letter to have the case withdrawn is not submitted by the applicant.
it naa5; be advisable for the Council to determine il' Staff's interpretatiola of tile deck plans and applicable code
sections is correct prior to action on the Resolution, if needed.
ADDITIONAL COM M ENTS
If the applicant does not submit a letter, Staff would highly recolnmend the Resolution for denial be adopted
The 60-day extension period will end on July ,,,,th
,,u . Tabling or continuing tile case to the next regular Citx.'
Council meeting will require both tile applicant and City to agree to a 2® extension. This could be
problematic if both parties don't agree to sign an extension letter. Again, Staff would recommend that City
Council act on the matter consistent with Staff's recomnlendation at Tuesday's meeting.
The Planning Colnmission's recommendation for denial of the applicant's variance request included tile
motion that decks have a 6 feet setback. As a part oFcontinuing this item from the last City Council meeting,
the Council sought direction from the Commission on this item. Staff' believes this provides that direction.
Minutes from the May 6'h Planning Commission meeting are included in you packet material.
123 North Third Street, 5utte lO(), Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3581 -
t2. 4
#02-11 3030 II,"D I/'ariance
City Council fidemo~wndut~t
Atl. r, 17, 2002
The Mound Zoning Ordinance designates the City Council as the Board of Acljusm~ents and Appeals to
detemfine the interpretation of the Ordinance. The role of the Planning Conmfission is to provide support to
the City Council. Ultimately it is the City Council who is charged with rendering a decision on the
interpretation of the zoning code if a party suggests that Staff has administered the code incorrectly.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft resolution 02- __ based on Planning Commission recommendation
2. Draft resolution 02-~ to adopting staff interpretation of City. Code Section "5.,.. 0:440' Subd. "., (B)
and (F)
3. July 15, 2002 letter fi'om Karl Yeager
4. July 1, 2002 letter fi'om Sarah Smith to John and Kathy Aquilina
5. Concept plan / elevation received June 27. 2002
6. July 1, 2002 letter from Sarah Smith to Greg and Kathv Fall
7. Ma!, 28, 2002 City Council meeting minute excerpts
8. May 28.. 2001 12002] letter from Wynn Curtiss
9. Zoning Code Section 350:440 Subd. 3
10. Zoning Code Section 350:5 t 0
11. May 23, 2002 City Council Executive SummaL~,' and attachments
1~.~ North Third Street, ,Suite 100. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
~ ~8-J800 [:'ax (612) 338-6838
(6~ 2)" '
-3582-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 02-
RESOLUTION TO DENY A SIDEYARD SETBACK
VARIANCE FOR A DECK LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY
AT 3030 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE
PID # 19-117-23-34-0073
P & Z CASE #02-11
WHEREAS, the applicant, John and Kathy Aquilina, have submitted a request for a
sideyard setback variance. The variance request is as follows:
Deck sideyard setback
Proposed Required Variance
1.2 ft. 4 ft. 2.8 ft.
; mad,
WHEREAS, the property is located within the R-IA Single Family Residential District
which requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, and principal structure setbacks 30 feet for front
yard and 6 feet for side yards lots of record; and,
WHEREAS, in 1997, the applicant was issued a building pemut to construct a new
single family dwelling at 3030 Islmad View Drive. The survey submitted with the building permit
application indicates a "deck" and a "future deck" on the lakeside of the house. Building plans
for the deck however, were not included with the building permit application for the house mad
consequently, the construction of the deck was never authorized or approved; and,
WHEREAS, the house is a single-story design with a lakeside walkout. The deck is
located on the lakeside of the house and has the same elevation as the main floor. Dimensions are
approximately 14 feet by 52 feet. The encroaching part of the deck is the portion extending past
the south wall of the house; and,
WHEREAS, decks are considered to be part of principal structure and are subject to the
sane yard setbacks except under certain circumstances as outlined in Section 350:440 Subd. 3(C)
where they may be considered for reductions to their required setback; and,
WHEREAS, a stairway is located on the south side of the house which provides access
to the deck. As constructed, the point where the stairway reaches the deck surface is subject to
applicable setbacks as defined in Section 350:440 Subd. 3; and,
WHEREAS, the existing deck does qualify for a reduced setback however, as
constructed it is not in conformance with the code; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Comlnission has reviewed the request and recommended that
the City Council deny the variance as requested by the applicant; and,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City does hereby deny the variance request based on the following findings of
fact:
-3583-
Co
The nonconforming deck condition is the direct result of actions of the applicant.
There are no special conditions present that are the result lot size, shape or
topography.
The granting of a variance would confer special privileges to the applicant not
afforded to other single-family property owners.
The literal interpretation of the provision of tiffs ordinance would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other property owners in the same
district under the terms of this ordinance.
The granting of a variance would be materially detrimental to the spirit and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance.
The granting of a variance would "legitimize" the existing deck encroaclm~ent
and continue to negatively impact to the adjacent property by limiting sight lines
and the separation between homes.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
and
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
-3584-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 02-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE STAFF INTERPRETATION
OF ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 350:440 SUBD. 3 (B) AND (F)
WHEREAS, it has been brought to the attention of the Mound City Council by an
aggrieved party that Staff's administration of zoning ordinance sections 350:440 Subd. 3 (B) and
(F) are in error; and,
WHEREAS, City Staff provided an interpretation of the above referenced sections in a
July 18, 2002 Melnorandum from Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc.: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council received and reviewed the memorandum at its July 23,
2002 meeting, concurring that Staff's interpretation and conclusions are correct.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
The City does hereby adopt the Staff interpretation of Zoning Ordinance Sections
5 .
~ 0:440 Subd 3 (B) and (F) and conclusions contained in the July 18, 2002
Memorandum from Hoisington Koeglcr Group, Inc.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councihnember
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following Councihnembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted July 23, 2002
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
-3585-
Jul-15-0Z 15:31 Fr0m-MEAGHER & GEER
T-138 P,Q3/{36 F-831
4200 MUCT~I~OOD$ Tow~:~,
33 SoLrm SlX'm
M~N~s, M~A 55402
~C~HON~; (612) 338-0661
FA~zMI~ (612) 338.8384
Direct Dial No,: (612) 347-9105
lnternet KY EAG ERt~a~meag her. corn
July 15, 2002
Honorable Members of the City Council
City of Morned
5341 Maywood Roax. t
Mound, MN 55364-1687
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Re:
John and Kathy Aquiline Variance Request
Our File No, 55230-1
Dear Honorable Members of the City Council:
You took thc above-referenced matter under consideration at the City Council meeting on May 28,
2002. You wiI1 recall that the Aquilinas' deck, which was constructed without a building permit, encroached
within the 6-foot rear-yard setback requirement. Existing stairs, leading down from the deck to the ground
level, also within the 6-foot setback, raised an issue as to whether a 4-foot or 6-foot setback applied. After
considerable discussion, a motion was made and seconded to table thc matter for 60 days pending submission
to thc Planning Commission for determination of whether the Aquilinas' deck encroachment was subject to a
6-foot or 4-foot setback requirement.
This issue was not submitted to the Planning Commission. Instead, the Aquflinas apparently
convinced Sarah Smith and staffthat the setback ordinance could be construed to permit thc deck and stairs,
with only slight modifications, to remain in place. The Aquilinas submitted a plan for modification of the
deck, presmnably consistent with staff's present interpretation of thc setback ordinance.
By letter dated July 1,2002 to our clients, Greg and Kathy Fall, Ms. Smith informed the Falls that the
Aquilinas' revised deck plans now "satis~' applicable Zoning and Building Codes", despite the fact that, other
than slight modifications to the deck to take it outside of the 6-foot setback requirement and modification of
the stairs ~o create a landing, neither the essential configuration, shape, or footprint of the deck (and, more
importantly, the area encompassed by both) have changed.
The Aquilinas' revised deck plan complies with neither the letter nor the spirit of applicable zoning
and building codes. The City staff's "interpretation" of the zoning code in this case is mistaken and would set
an imprudent precedent if allowed to stand. The purpose of this letter is twofold: (1) to re~ster our clients'
objection to the interpretation of the GitY Code as propounded by Ms. Smith and staff; and (2) to request that
the City consider a resolution (in addition to the one proposed by staff denying the Aquilinas' variance
request) to submit this matter to the Planning Commission for determination of whether the stairs in the
Aquilinas' side yard are subject to a 2-foot or 6-foot setback.
MINNhAI'<)LI$, .~ 1NNESC, TA
SCOWS, DALE, AR3ZONA
-3586-
Jul-lS-O2 15:31 From-MEAGHER & GEER +612338B~B4 T-I~B P.04/06 F-~31
July 15, 2002
Page 2
1. Objection to Interpretation of City Code Section 350:440~ Subd. 3(B)
By letter dated July 1, 2002, Ms. Smith informed the Aquilinas that ~eir proposed deck modifications
"now qualify the structure as a ~staircasc' which is an allowable encroachment according to City Code Section
350:440 Subd. 3 (B)..." Nowhere in that Subdivision or anywhere else in the entire Section is there reference
to "staircase". Nor does the context or spirit of the Section support the interpretation staff is apparently
willing to make for the Aquilinas.
City Code Section 350.440 Subd. 3(B) provides as follows:
The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements: ...
Uncovered porches, stoops, or similar entrance structures not exceeding 32
square feet which do not extend in elevation above the height of the ground
floor elevation of the principal building, and steps that do not extend to a
distance of less than two (2) feet from any lot line.
The steps (not staircase) from Aquilinas' deck do not extend from an uncovered porch, stoop,
or similar earrance structure. The deck is not an entrance structure and in any event far exceeds 32
square feet. The common sense interpretation oft_his provision is that steps (that do not extend less
than 2 feet from a lot line), ./bom an uncovered porch, stoop or similar structure, will not be
considered to be an encroachment.
Under Ms, Smith's and staff's interpretation, any steps, attached to any structure, whether or not it is
an uncovered porch, stoop, or similar entrance structure not exceeding 32 square feet, comes within the
exception ofSubd. 3(B). That interpretation would not only set a dangerous and unintended precedent, but it
would also render another very important subdivision, Subd. 3(F), superfluous.
City Code Section 350.440 Subd. 3 (F) provides as follows:
The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard requirements:
F. Fire escapes not exceeding three (3) feet in width in side or rear yards only.
Under the interpretation of Subd. 3(B) as propounded by Ms. Smith and staff, the exception
in Subd. (F) would be meaningless, because fire escapes, comprised of steps, would always be
allowed to encroach within two feet of any lot line (including the front yard, which is specifically not
included in the exception provided under Subd.(F)). An applicant could simply identify the fire
escape stairs as "steps" and rely on staff's present interpretation of Subd. 3(B) to demand that a
building permit be issued, even if the steps encroach w/thin two thet of a lot line.
Subd. 3(F) should not be allowed to be subverted by Subd. 3(]3). One of the purposes of the setback
requirements is to address fire and safety concerns of the community and the neighbors affected by the
-3587-
Jul-15-02 15:32 From-MEAGHER & GEER +61H3H384 %138 P.05/06 F-E3]
Sarah Smith
July 15, 2002
Page 3
ordinance. Sub& 3(F) addressed those concerns by providing an exception (to wider setback requirements )
that nonetheless requires at least three feet between the property line and the fire escape stairs. Those
concerns include (1) access to the building by fire and rescue personnel and (2) safe egress for occupants.
These concerns are not just academic, but very real. The Aquilinas owua home was destroyed by fire several
years ago. If either Aquilinas or Falls construct a fence along their common property line, the encroachment
attempted to be legitimized by Aquilinas' proposal would severely resxrict not only access by fire or health
safety personnel along that side of Aquilinas' home, but it would also significantly impair escape routes for
occupants of the dwelling. The Falls will submit photos and a survey at the City Council meeting showing
limited side yard width at location of stairs.
City Codes, like statutes, are to be construed giving meaning to all provisions, if possible. Where one
construction, e.g., Ms. Smith's, renders another provision meaningless, that consumction is incorrect and
should not be adopted.
Furthermore, City Code Section 350.405, Subd 2 provides:
When the conditions imposed by any provisions of this Ordinance are either more
restrictive or less restrictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other law,
ordinance, statute, resolution or regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more
restrictive or which impose higher standards or requirements shall prevail.
Section 350.440, Subd 3 (B) should not be interpreted to subvert the meaning or applicability
of Section 350.405.
Neither submitting this matter to the Planning Commission for direction to building officials
as to the applicable setback for stairs attached to decks, nor the ultimate denial of a building permit
for Aquilinas' proposed modified deck, would create any undue hardship. The Aquilinas'
encroachment continues despite their faiktre to obtain a building permit in the first instance. More
importantly, with no more significant modification to the deck than now proposed by the Aquilinas,
the stairs could be moved to the lakeside or other end of the deck, where it had originally been
located in building plans.
2. Resolution to Refer Matter to Planning Commission
Despite this Council's direction at its May 28 meeting, the setback issue has not been submitted to the
Planning Connnission, because of staff s conclusions regarding the interpretation of one section of the City
Code. Despite staff s interpretation, the issue has not gone away. Instead, it has only been reformulated, i.e.,
are stairs and leu~dings attached to a deck (which deck is subject to a 6-foot setback from side lot lines) also
within the 6-foot setback requirement or only subject to a 2-foot setback? The repercussions are significant,
not only to the parties involved, but, at. least equally impormmly, to future building permit applicants for decks
or other structures. Therefore, on behalf of the Falls, I respectfully request that the Civ consider a resolution
(in additioa to the one proposed by staffdenying the Aquilinas' variarice request) at its July 23, 2002 to submit
-3588-
Jul-15-02 15:3~ From-~EAGHE~& GEER +6]2~8~384 T-138 P.06/06 F-~31
Sarah Smith
July 15, 2002
Page 4
this matter to the Planning Commisgion for determination of whether the stairs and landings in thc Aquilinas'
proposed reconfigured deck are subject to a 2-foo~ or 6-foot setback requirement.
Thank you for the opportunity to make the Falls' our position known on these issues and for
placing on the agenda their request that this matter be re-submitted to the Planning Commission as
initially directed by the Council.
Respectfully,
Karl J. Yeager
CC.'
Greg and Kathy Fall (via e-mail)
John Dean (via facsimile)
KJY/jlr
977282
-3589-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55354-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound,com
July 1, 2002
John and Kathy Aquilina
3030 Island View Drive
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Aquilina:
This letter is in response to the revised concept plan you submitted on June 27, 2002
regarding possible modifications to the deck and staircase at 3030 Island View Drive in
order to comply with both the building and zoning code requirements.
Be advised that the revised plan was reviewed by City staff, including the City Planner
and Building Official, on Friday, June 28, 2002. Based on our review, the proposed
modifications now qualify the structure as a "staircase" which is an allowable
encroachment according to City Code Section 350:440 Subd. 3 (B) therefore a variance is
no longer necessary.
For your review and consideration, City staff offers the following additional comments:
1. The proposed improvements will require the issuance of a building permit.
Be advised that City staff intends to include the matter on the July 23, 2002 City
Council meeting agenda in order to satisfy the directive made by the City Council
at its May 23, 2002 meeting.
If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience at
(952) 472-3190. Please be advised that I am out of the office from July 1 through July 5.
In my absence, please forward all comments to City Planner Loren Gordon. He can be
reached at (612) 252-7123.
Sincerely,
Sarah Smith
Community Development Director
I printed on recycled paper
-3590-
-3591 -
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
lAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
July 1, 2002
Greg and Kathy Fall
3026 Island View Drive
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Fall:
As you are aware, John and Kathy Aquilina, were directed by City Council at the May
23, 2002 meeting, to work with City Staff on modifications to their deck. It was the
desire of the Council that a revised plan would be brought back to a future meeting for
review.
Over the course of the last month, City Staffhas provided input to the Aquilinas on code
provisions that influence the modification of the deck. Staff has also reviewed a number
of ideas and iterations submitted by the Aquilinas.
At this time, City Staff has accepted revised deck plans that satisfy applicable Zoning and
Building Codes. Our review of the revised plans for the deck and stairway has concluded
that the proposed modifications that show the deck at a 6 feet setback from the property
line and the staircase at a 2 feet setback are allowable.
This item will be placed on the July 23, 2002 City Council agenda at which time City
Staff is recommending the Council adopt a resolution for denial of a setback variance for
a deck. We are providing you with a copy of the revised plans for your review prior to
that meeting. If you have any comments, please submit them to the City by July 15, 2002
for inclusion in the packet material and consideration by Council.
If'you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience at
(952) 472-3190. Please be advised that I am out of the office from July 1 through July 5.
In my absence, please forward all comments to City Planner Loren Gordon. He can be
reached at (612) 252-7123.
Sincerely,
Sarah Smith
Community Development Director
printed on recycled paper
-3592-
Mound City Council - May 28, 2002
7. DESIGN STUDY FOR NEW WELL & APPROVAL OF WELLHEAD PROTECTION
PLAN
City Engineer, John Cameron, explained that the City has two wells that need to be
replaced and received a proposal from an outside firm to perform the investigation
needed to determine where the well will best be placed to take care of the flows and to
take care of the wellhead protection plan, which has to be done whenever a new well is
installed.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the May '7, 2002, proposal
submitted by Emmons & Olivier Resources to John Cameron, and to authorize the City
Manager to enter into a contract in accordance with said proposal. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
8. RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCESS FOR ADOPTION;~r~F REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEAE;i!~G
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-63:
'ION INI
OF
A PUBLIC HEARIN(;
:ES,~ APPROVAL
AREA AND CALLING
MOTION by Meyer, seconded b
presented, with Balboa Center
redevelopment. Purchase
Motion carried.
Hanus
option agreement, as
hip, for land needed for the city's
parcel is $185,000. All voted in favor.
10; WESTERN ARE~tRE ACADEMY (WAFTA)
John Dean gave a~atus r~e,rt t~;{~§ Council, stating that Mound would not face
grant
for the
application site clean-up.
additional habd~, spons.or ~the training
Approval to act a~,onsor w~give by Council on May 14, 2002.
,..~ ....
~. PLANNING COM'~S~ CASE -~02-11: ,JOHN & KATHY AQUILINA '
Loren Gordon gave histo~' of this case, stating that the Planning Commission reviewed
it at thei[ May 6, 2002 regular meeting at which time they recommended denial of a
variance request for an existing deck. The Planning Commission agreed with the sta~s
recommendati~.for denial to approve based ~n the findings of fact supplied in the
proposed resolution
Discussion followed between the Council, the applicant and neighboring property
owners.
MOTION by Meyer to adopt the proposed resolution, denying the variance request.
Motion died for lack of a second. ..,
After lengthy discus§ion, there was a MOTION by HanUs, seconded by Osmek to refer
this case back to the Planning Commission, and request clarification and determination
-~593-'
by staff of the setback requirements and ideas on possible redesign of the structure to
eliminate or reduce the amount of variance needed. Staff will also initiate a 60-day
extension on this variance application. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
12. DOCKS AND COMMONS
A. Action on Homeowner's Associations As they Relate To The Commercial Dock
Ordinance - Councilmember Brown stepped down during discussion of this item due
to a possible perceived conflict of interest. City Attorney Dean Will review the current
ordinance to make sure it is in line with the Council's intention regarding licensing of
commercial docks. Councilmember Brown returned to his seat on the Council.
Amendin.q the 2002 Dock Location Map - MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown
to amend the 2002 Dock Location Map to re-establish SWC sites 40550K and
40550L as permanent sites, leaving sites 40550G and 40550H as temporary. All
voted in favor. Motion carried.
'13. NAMING OF PARKS FORM
The presented form will appear in the City's next
suggestions from citizens regarding naming of parks
developments. Following previously stated
will be adhered to.
form asks for
and Rottlund
naming of parks
'14. PRESENTATIONS TO THE COUNCIL
A. Crv irma on lakesca
site for planting along the
Crv
exl the test
as to the LMCD.
Commission for their cons
B. Le.qacy Foundation-
Foundation to the C¢
and to recognize
C. Todd Warner on brin
Council that
Mound
Mound to
of Mound set
pier.
that
Motion carried.
resented the concept of the Legacy
oals is to bridge the fourteen lake cities
to Mound - Todd Warner informed the
Museum operates the Minnehaha
It is proposed to construct a pier at
this boat, making it possible to add
tours and stops. Warner also requested that the City
account to accept donations for construction of said
regarding the perceived pros and cons of such a pier.
A neighboring res~¢ ;nt spoke with reference to the parking problem already
present in that area, and expressed concern over increasing the traffic flow
without additional parking.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to direct staff to work with Mr. Warner
to 'develop a dock plan sufficient to make application to the LMCD, notice in the
paper that this topic will be discussed at the next Council meeting, and approve
that the City act as fiscal agent to accept donations for this project. The following
voted in favor: Hanus, Meisel, Osmek and Meyer. The following voted against;
Brown. Motion carried.
4
-3594-
MILLER, STE1NER & CURTIS~
ATTOP, NRYS AT LAW
~0~ ~ ~gT ST~_~r SOUT~
HOPKINS, MN ~4~
FAX (9~2) 9~-?~70
Writer's Dire~ Di~l N~ (g$2) 253-0071
Mr. John Dean
IC~?~dy & G~wn
470 P~lksbury C~tcr
Mim~polis, MN 55402
May 28, 2001
BY FACSIMILE ~ FIRST CLASS
Re: 3030 IsI~d View Drive
D~r Ma'. Dean.
I r~pmScut fl~ residents of 3030 Island Vi~v D~ve, Jo~ ~d ~$y ~i~ ~ you ~ probably
a~, ~ Aq~ ~ ~ ~e ~t of~v~ legal ~o~ mg~ a ~ ~~ on ~ir
~p~ in 19D7-1998. A~ issue is ~ ~ d~ m it ~ ~ola~s ~ Mo~ set~
requiem. ~e ci~ of~md h~ ffl~d a ~min~ ~ge ag~ ~. ~1~ d~g s~h a
Mo~gon. In ~ifion, ~e Momd Pl~i~ Co~!sg~ ~ ~ ~ Aq~l~' mq~g for a
v~mce. ~e "ap~al" of~ d~sion is ~ed ~fore ~e Mo~d Ci~ Co~cil ~night
~e r~n 1 ~ ~g g ~ lam ho~ ~ rb~ Mr. Aqml~ mid me f~ the &m ~ 1~ we~ ~
~e Mo~d Ci~ Im~r who ~w~ ~e co~Hon of~e Aq!~iU~ ho~ ~ deck, ~. !on
Su~ml~d, r~fly told ~ ~a M, ~. Su~, b~gd ~ 199g ~t ~e ~ck ~d ~roa~h
~to ~e s~xb~k ~. SU~d told ~, Aq~ ~t al ~e gm~ he eo~r~ ~
m ~ so mi~r ~ k ~ not wo~ m~fing ~ d~k to ~ made eomp~t, ~. S~~ did
s~ r~s ~o~on ~ ~. ~~ or ~s b~l~ M 1998. He o~y told ~. Aq~l~a recency
~ disCmsions ~si~ ~om ~ igg~ process re~g ~ d~k.
I Mve not spo~ Pmmnally ~ ~, Su~lmd so ~s ~o~fion is only ~ it ~ ~layed lo me
by my ch~t. Howev~, if k is ~t~, I MH~e my cH~t mighg ~ve a ~omble
~pel ~g~ent ag~t ~dreg~ng ~fo~t of~ sct~k rc~~t M s '
~ f Mr A ~s~ ee
· q ~ apphca~on be ~led ~ Co
~rMpsre~to~eP~n~ingCommlssio~ ,~a .............. ~ ~ fl, or
o~, ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ . --~ -, ~ ~*~mm= wmm~ ~. ~erl~d did ~ fact
P L ~ncm~r a 1991.
In ~he meantime, my client will coarinue to work with Ms. Smith a~d the ~zteat oily i~speclor
regarding whaI ah~rafions ~ ~e deck, if any, mighl be rnad~ ~o put rim cl~k in compliance. I wo~d.
algrl you to Lh.~e legal issu~ that have been discussed hut not resolve, d, Firsg ~hcre is Some
-3595-
~cd~ to ~ c~fied ifm~ cli~ ~ ~o ~ able ~ cam 1 ~ .
of my cHe~'y b~n? ~e ~s ~ ~ue ~ m w~ con~mtes ~, ~ ~1
~me ~r p~ses of ~~g ~ ~i~ of~e m~ y~d ~ ~ 4 ~oI s~ck
bm ~e s~ffhm ~ ~lc ~ m~ w~t would be a l~d~g. S~, mns~on o~a "I~,, is
one of~e o~tb~ berg cool,md by ~e Aq~ to ~ ~to comp~ i~ is obviomly vi~
· eir way to you s~ or la~. ~ ..~ ..~a~ l ~ct mey l~ely ~ll work
If you have any clUeSl~oas, pl=~se f~el ll'ee 1~ comact me. Thank you for your assisTlm~.
cc. John and Y,,arlly Aquil~i
-3596-
Mound City Code : 350.440
350.440 Required Yards and Open Space.
Subd. 1. No yard or other open space shall be reduced in area or dimension so as
to make such yard or other open space less than the minimum required by this
Ordinance, and if the existing yard or other open space as existing is less than the
minimum required, it shall not be further reduced.
Subd. 2. No required yard or other open space allocated to a building or dwelling
group shall be used to satisfy yard, other open space, or minimum lot area requirements
for any other building.
Subd. 3. The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard
requirements.
Chimneys, window air conditioners, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters,
lintels, ornamental features, mechanical devices, comices, eaves,
gutters, and the like, provided they do not extend more than two (2) feet
into the required yard area.
Uncovered porches, stoops or similar entrance structures not exceeding
32 square feet which do not extend in elevation above the height of the
ground floor elevation of the principal building, and Steps~that2do~not~
l.iextend ~to~ a distance of qess thamtwo,, (2)! feet,~from any~!lot~lin~.~
Decks, balconies, and the like, attached to the principal building which
extend in elevation above the height of the ground floor elevation of the
principal building; and decks, balconies, and the like, detached from the
principal building and exceeding 30 inches in height above the
surrounding grade provided they do not extend within ten (10) feet of the
rear lot line or extend beyond side yard and front yard accessory
building setbacks. On lakeshore lots, such structures shall comply.~with
~the lakeshore setbaelt of the principal structure. ~
DetaChed decks or similar structures Which do not extend above 30
inches in elevation abov6 'the height of the surrounding grade and do not
extend to a distance of less than two (2) feet from any lot line:~::On:.~ ~
lakeshore lots, such structures shall comply with the lakeshore setback of ~
the,principal structure. ~
27
-3597-
215100
Mound City Code
350.440, Subd. 3. E.
Fo
Yard lights and name plate signs for single and two family dwellings,
lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety
and security purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible
from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property. Such
fixtures may be located within five (5) feet of the front lot line.
Fire escapes not exceeding three (3) feet in width in side' or rear yards
only.
Recreational equipment such as a swing set, slide, climbing apparatus,
sandbox and the like, clotheslines, picnic tables and other equipment
accessory to and associated with the residential use ofproperty.
Bay windows, provided the encroachment within the yard area does not
exceed eight (8) square feet and provided the setback of the principal
wall conforms to district setback requirements.
Subd. 4. Buildings may be excluded from side yard requirements if party walls
are utilized or if the adjacent buildings are planned to be constructed as an integral
structure and a conditional use permit is secured.
Subd. 5. Comer Lots. Lots which abut on more than one street shall provide the
required front yards along every street except for lots of record which shall provide a
side yard setback abutting the street based on the lot width as follows:
Lot Width
Minimum Side Yard Setback
On Corner Lots
40-50 feet 10 feet
51-80 feet 20 feet
81 feet or more 30 feet
28
215100
-3598-
Mound City Code 350.500, Subd. 3.
Subd. 3. Maintain permanent and current records of this Ordinance, including but
not limited to: all maps, amendments, ahd special uses, variances, appeals and
'applications therefore.
Subd. 4. Receive, file, and forward all applications for appeals, variances, special
uses or other matters to the designated official bodies..
Subd. 5. Institute in the name of the City, any appropriate actions or proceedings
against a violator as provided for.
Subd. 6. Serve as an ex-officio non-voting member of the Planning Commission.
350.510
Appeals and the Board of Adjustment and Aopeals.
Subd. 1. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments shall be the City Council.
Planning Commission shall hear and advise the City Council of its findings and
determinations.
The
Subd. 2. The Board of AdjUstment and Appeals shall act upon all questions as
they may arise in the administration of this Ordinance, including the interpretation of
zoning maps, and it shall hear and decide appeals f~m and review any order,
requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official charged with
enforcing the Ordinance~ Such appeal may be taken by any person, firm or corporation
aggrieve~l or by any officer, dopa~ment, board or bureau of a town, municipality,
county or state.
Subd. 3:. The conditions for the issuance of a variance are as indicated in
Subsection 350.530 of this Ordinance. No use variances (a use different from that
permitted in the district) shall be issued by the Board of Adjustmont and Appeals:~
Subd. 4. Hearings of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall be held.within
such time and upon such notice to interested panics as is provided in its ad°Pted rules
for .the transaction of its business, The Board shall, within areasonable time, make its
omler deciding the matmr and. shal~l serve a. copy .of such order upon the appellant: or
pefifionor bY mall. 'Any party may. appear at the hearing in person or by agent or
attorney. ·,..
Subd. 5. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may reverse or affirm wholly or
pa~ty or modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination as.in i.ts opinion
ought to be made in the premises and to that end shall have alt the powers of the officer
~om whom.the appeal was taken and may issue or direct the issuance of a permit. The
reasons for the Board's decision shall be stated.
38
9/23/01
-3599-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
TO: Mound City Com~cil and Staff
FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP
DATE: May 23, 2002
SUBJECT: PC Case #02-11, 3030 Island View Drive - Variance Request
This case was reviewed by the Planning Conmfission at their May 6, 2002 regular meeting at which time the
Conmfission recommended denial of the applicant's request for a variance. The Planning Conm~ission agreed
with Staff's reconm~endation for denial and approved a recommendation for denial based on the findings of
fact supplied in the attached Resolution.
Since the Planning Conm~ission meeting, Staff visited the site to took at the deck for issues that were
discussed at the meeting. At that time, the applicant expressed interest in modifying the deck to qualify as an
acceptable encroaclunent. Plans to address this modification have not been submitted to the City at this time.
One of the items that needs further clarification is the definition of a "landing." Attached is a memo from the
Building Official providing an interpretation of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. The Building Official
confirms that a floor or landing must be present at the top and bottom of a stairway and meet certain
dimensions to provide proper safety and mobility. This building code definition can easily be confused with a
zoning interpretation in this case.
The zoning code does not specifically use the word "landing" but recognizes the need to allow certain
structures within required setback areas. The staim~ay is one of the allowed encroaclnnents provided in the
code. The point where the stairway reaches the level of the deck, as it is currently constructed, is not
considered a "landing" under Section 350:440 Subd. 3(B). That open floor area, has beeu designed to be
integral to the deck and therefore, must meet deck requirements.
The applicant may choose to ask the Council for time to evaluate other desigm modifications for the deck to
satisfy code requirements. If presented, the case could be tabled to provide time for the applicant to prepare
plans for Staff review. Having said that, the Council could simply adopt the proposed resolution to deny the
request which would in effect force a redesigned deck to conform.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Draft resolution 02-__ based on Plmming Connnission recommendation
2. May 6, 2002 Plmming Commission meeting minutes excerpts
3. Letter dated May 15, 2002 from City Attorney' Jolm Dean
4. Memorandum from Building Official Matt Simoneau dated May 13, 2002
5. Planning Report dated April 30, 2002
6. Deck handout
t23 North Third Street, Suite 100, Mim~eapotis, Mimaesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3600-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 02-
RESOLUTION TO DENY A SIDEYARD SETBACK
VARIANCE FOR A DECK LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY
AT 3030 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE
PID it 19-117-23-34-0073
P & Z CASE/402-11
WHEREAS, the applicant, John and Kathy Aquilina, have submitted a request for a
sideyard setback variance. The variance request is as follows:
Deck sideyard setback 1.2 ft.
Proposed Required Variance
4ft. 2.8 ft.
; and,
WHEREAS, the property is located within the R-IA Single Family Residential District
which requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, and principal structure setbacks 30 feet for front
yard and 6 feet for side yards lots of record; and,
WHEREAS, in 1997, the applicant was issued a building permit to construct a new
single family dwelling at 3030 Island View Drive. The survey submitted with the building permit
application indicates a "deck" and a "fiaure deck" on the lakeside of the house. Building plans
for the deck however, were not included with thc building pcm~it apl)lication for the house and
consequently, the construction of the deck was ncver atttborized or approvcd: and,
WHEREAS, the house is a single-sto%, design with a lakeside walkout. The deck is
located on the lakeside of the house and bas the same elevation as the main floor. Dimensions are
approximately 14 feet by 52 feet. The encroaching part of the deck is the portion extending past
the south wall of the house and,
WHEREAS, decks are considered to be part of principal structure and are subject to the
same yard setbacks except under certain circulnstances as outlined in Section 350:440 Subd 3(C)
where they may be considered for reductions to their required setback: and,
WHEREAS, a stairway is located on tile south side of the house which provides access
to the deck. As constructed, the point wherc thc stairway reaches the deck surface is subject to
applicable setbacks as defined in Section 350:440 Subd 3; and,
WHE~REAS, thc existing deck does qualify for a reduced setback however, as
constructed it is'not in confommnce with thc code: and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recolnmended that
the City Council deny tbe variance as requested by the applicant: and.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by tile City Council of thc City of Motmd,
Minnesota, as follows:
The City does hereby de,Iv the variancc request based on the following findings of
-3601 -
a. The nonconforming deck condition is the direct result of actions of the applicant.
b. There are no special conditions present that are the result lot size, shape or
topography.
Co
do
The granting of a variance would confer special privileges to the applicant not
afforded to other single-family property owners.
The literal interpretation of the provision of this ordinance would deprive the
applicant of' rights commonly enjoyed by other property owners in the same
district under the terms of this ordinance.
The granting ora variance xvouid be materially detrimental to the spirit and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance.
The granting of a variance would "legitimize" the existing deck encroachment
and continue to negatively impact to the adjacent property by limiting sight lines
and the separation between homes.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councihnember
seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
m~d
Adopted May 28, 2002
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
-3602-
EXCEPTS FROM
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 6, 2002
BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE #02-11 Variance- Deck setback
John and Kathy Aquilina
3030 Island View Drive
The deck was built not in conformance with the code. They are requesting a 2.8 foot variance on
the south side. The survey submitted with the original building permit showed the deck in
conformance. On the plans the deck was indicated as future and plans were not included. The
deck was never approved as part of the building permit for the house. A certificate of occupancy
was issued in 1998 and did not include the deck.
The code looks at these decks in a number of ways. Typically, we ascribe principal structure
setbacks for decks unless there are reasons we would want to give them an encroachment. The
code allows a deck that is higher than 30 feet off the ground could have a 4-foot setback instead
of 6 feet. The steps are allowed a 2-foot setback.
We need to focus on how to view this if we were reviewing it with the building permit. When
the house was proposed we did have at least 1 set of plans, and possibly 2, that showed a
conforming deck. If we were to look at this, absent the deck, the same thought process probably
played itself through to say there is nothing about the lot, dimensions, shape, or house saying
there was a hardship with this side of the property. It's a deck, not a 2-story house. Is it a
hardship to remove the non-conformity? Staff felt it wasn't and our recommendation is to deny
the request with the following conditions: 1. Make the deck meet the setback.
2. Have the building permit applied for to modify the deck and building official will review
the plan and establish fees, and possibly penalties for applying for the permit after the fact.
3. After modification an as-built survey should be submitted.
Findings of Fact to support the recommendation:
1. Deck is result of the direct actions of the applicant, not inherited f~om another property
owner.
-3603-
Planning Commission Minutes May 6, 2002
2. Conditions present are not a result of the lot size, dimension or topography.
3. If a variance was granted it would confer special privileges to the applicant not afforded to
other property owners.
4. The granting of a variance would be materially detrimental to the spirit and intent of the
Zoning ordinance.
5. The granting of a variance would "legitimize" the existing deck encroachment amd
continue to negatively impact to the adjacent property by limiting sight lines and the
separation between homes.
The City of Mound has no litigation proceedings against the property owner at this time. There
is a suit between the adjacent property ownerS. There is an enforcement action that has been filed
by the City of Mound to correct the situation. This has been temporarily halted until the variance
request has been acted upon.
Clapsaddle felt it was a very clean-cut and simple issue. He likes staff's proposed solution.
Mueller clarified that Best and Flarmagan provided the Planning Commissioners a supplemental
packet that was not part of the official packet. It was forwarded to the City by the legal council
of the adjacent property owner. Each Commissioner was provided an identical copy prior to the
meeting.
Discussion followed regarding the wording of the Code and its application to the deck in
question.
Burma was concerned about the relationship of Mr. Meller. He is the attorney for the property
owner to the south and also city attomey for the City of Wayzata. Gordon assured that it is not
an issue but that John Dean has spoken to him regarding this on a number of occasions. City
Attomey agrees with staff's position on this issue.
Discussion
John Aquilina- 3030 Island View Drive - In March of 1997 the home was destroyed by fire.
The original house plans did include a deck. August 11, 1997 the house was demolished. Either
the builder didn't give the revised plans to the City or the plans were misplaced in City Hall.
However, a later revised plan from the builder indicates a 10 foot wrap-around deck. According
to the packet, an attached deck 30 inches or more above the ground floor does not have setback
requirements. He felt that the code was clear.
Burma asked for a clarification of the Planning Report. Gordon felt that the applicant's
interpretation was in error and that the intent was as stated in the Planning Report.
The portion of the deck in question is the landing area at the top of the stairs. Again, by code,
the landing area may extend within 2 feet of the lot line. The variance would be 10 inches.
The Planning Report indicates that the construction of the deck was never authorized. The
builder and the city were on different pages. Mr. Aquilina put his faith in the builder.
-3604-
Planning Commission Minutes May 6, 2002
The Planning Report indicates that the deck extends the house 14 feet. Mr. Aquilina maintains
that it is only 10 feet.
Mr. Aquilina indicated that the deck handout and the code are not identical. The area in question
is the landing area at the top of the stairs. He inquired if the word "landing" was no longer used.
The Deck packet that was received from Smith does not match.
Gordon responded that a landing is generally in the middle of a flight of stairs. He indicated that,
for the Planning Report, he quoted directly from the Code.
The house and deck were built 4 years ago. The former building official approved the plans and
issued a certificate of occupancy. Builder was expected to follow code. Existing retaining wall
on the side of the house made the location of the stairs logical. Special privilege is what any
variance is about. Sight lines are not affected by any degree by a 10-inch variance: Separation
between the homes is not an issue because theirs is 20 some feet closer to the lake.
Ayaz stated that the deck was built without a permit. If we were able to take the time back we
wouldn't issue the permit as it is.
Crreg Fall - 3036 Island View Drive - Variances are applied for in cases of hardship. Both
properties have the same basic shape and topography. There aren't any hardships other than
those that were self-created. It is important to have laws enforced. 1) There was no permit. 2)
There was no permit application. 3) The deck is a different shape on the plans than what was
built. 4) We are asking that the deck be brought into cqmpliance with city code. He feels that the
sight line and privacy is impacted.
Burma inquired about Mr. Fall's setback expectation. The setback issue is confusing and needs
to be clarified. Mr. Fall wants it to conform to the ordinancel
John Aquilina said criticism states that it is not in the spirit of the ordinance. Six months ago a
variance was requested by Mr. Fall from the LMCD and I spoke in favor of the variance. Island
View Drive has many variances. He is asking for the same consideration.
MOTION by Clapsaddle, seconded by Weiland, to move staff recommendation. ~
Mueller stated that it is his understanding that the setback is 6 feet. Previous discussions confirm
that.
Clapsaddle amends the motion to establish a 6-foot sideyard setback. Weiland approved the
amendment.
Mueller wanted to include a Finding of Fact as follows: plans were received by the city on
7/25/97. It afforded the applicant to make any revisions. At that time the plan was for the deck
not to go past the existing structure and the stairway was on the other side.
Clapsaddle felt we should not be dealing with integrity of contractor or any of the responsibility
of contractor. Contractor is responsible to the owner; owner is responsible to the city.
MOTION carried. Voting against: Burma. Voting for: Ayaz, Clapsaddle, Glister, Hasse,
Mueller, Weiland and Brown
Burma voted against because staff recommendation came with punitive measures to deny. -3605-
C
RTER
E D
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis MN 55402
(612) 337-9300 telephone
(612) 337-9310 fax
http://www, kennedy-graven.com
JOHN B. D~AN
Attorney at Law
Direct Dial (612) 337-9207
Em,ail: j dean~kennedy-graven.com
May 15, 2002
Sarah Smith
Community Development Director
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Aquilina Variance Request.
Dear Sarah: .
:~ At the May 6, 2002 Planning Commission consideration of this matter, one of the "" "': ! ~ '
commissioners mentioned that the attorney representing an abutting property owner, opposed to the
variance, was also the city attorney for the city where you previously worked as city planner.
Following that comment, Loren Gordon, who had been handling the presentation of the'matter for
the planning staff, informed the commission that that issue had been previously discussed with me.
Because this matter is now scheduled for consideration by the city council at its May 28,
· 2002 meeting, it will be helpful to reduce our earlier discussions on this matter to writing.
During two telephone conversations, one a conference call that also included Loren Gordon,
you reminded us that you and the attorney for an abutting property owner had previously worked for
the same city, you as city planner and he as city attorney. You stated that, although that connection'
would have no influence on your handling of this matter one way or the other, you would disqualify
you?self from involvement if it were legally necessary.
I informed you that there clearly was no legal basis that would necessitate you to disqualify
yoUrself from the matter.
~ ;.-:' '. ~ i':You further indicated that Loren Gordon was fully versed in the application} and would b~,
able to prepare'the staff report and present the matter tO the planning commissionifthat would ~' ~
eliminate any suggestion of a possible conflict. My response was that, although it was entirely up to
you, in a highly contested matter such as this, it could be beneficial to avoid creating a basis to
challenge the decision process, even if that basis were unfounded.
JBD-214651vl
MU220-5
-3606-
Sa~:ah Smith
5/14/02
Page 2 of 2
My previous opinion of no legal basis for disqualification applys equally to presentation of
the matter to the city council. However, I imagine that your decision on participation before the
city council will involve evaluation of the same factors you considered in determining your role
before the plamfing commission
Respectfully ~urs,
cc: K. Hanson
B. Ritter (for inclusion in council packets)
-3607-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN $~364
(952) 4~3190
MEMORANDUM
To: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
From: Matt Simoneau
Date: May 13, 2002
Re: Variance Application - 3030 Island View Drive
In response to your questions regarding the temporary certificate of occupancy issued at the
above noted address and the Uniform Building Code definition ora landing, the following
information is provided.
CERTIHCATE OF OCCUPANCY
Former Building Official Jon Sutherland issued a temporary certificate of occupancy on
February 16, 1998 subject to the inspection notice dated February 26, 1998. (See attached).
The temporary certificate of occupancy expired on June 15, 1998.
Section 1305.0109 of the State Building Code requires that a certificate of occupancy be
issued for all new or substantially remodeled buildings. In addition, Uniform Building Code
section 108 requires a final inspection when the building is completed and ready for
occupancy. Section 108 also states that it is the duty of the permit holder to request the
required final inspection.
DEFINmON OF LANDING
Section 1003.3.1.6 of the Uniform Building Code requires that there be a landing on each side
ora door and section 1003.3.5 requires that a floor or landing be provided at the top and
bottoms of each stairway or run of stairs. In each instance the landing shall be a minimum of
36" x 36".
-3608-
Ci[y of Mound
Depart.~,ent of Building Inspection
- -
3030 ZS~D VZ[~ DR[~ _ - B~.Pe~
~n~N~ mAd~re~ LI~STROH' S, 9620 10TH
-3609-
, CITY OF MOUND
INSPECTION/N~OTiCE
M T W ~ F
PERMIT NO.p./~..~,b L~J=~/'~ _ SCHEDULED,.~~
ADDRESS ~
OWNER PHONE #
CONTRACTOR PHONE #
E] FOOTING
[] FRAMING [] SITE INSPECTION
D GRADING/EXCAV.
W.rm~
[] PLUMBING ROUGH-IN
~,PLUMBING FINAL
I-] INSULATION ~,,.MECHANICAL [] CO
~'~ [] WALLBOARD _ MPLAINT
'U'FIREPLACE AT THROAT
g i~.."..°.?REss ~ F'REPLACE F,NAL ~ FOLLOW-UP
/~mmP, L., ~) DEMOLITION ~
_~ - . - .~
WORK SATI~ ' '
~ CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING '
~ CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS INSPECTOR WI
~ STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR ' LL RETURN
~ INSPECTION REQUIRED. CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS
next inspection 24 ho
Ow.er Cont ;. .
,...ctor -0600
Ci~ of Mound, ~1 ~a~d Road, Mound, Minnesota 5~
Yellow C~y/Sile NoUce
While Copy/Inspecto¢s File
-3610-
1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1003.3.1.10
1003.3.3.6
3. The egress-control device shall be capable of being deacti-
vated by a signal from a switch located in an approved location.
4. An irreversible process that will deactivale the egress-con-
trol device shall be initiated whenever a manual force of not more
than 15 pounds (66.72 N) is applied for two seconds In the panic
bar or other door-latching hardware. Tile egress-control device
shall deactivate within an approved time period not to exceed a
total of 15 seconds. The time delay established for each egress-
control device shall not be field adjustable.
5. Actuation of the panic bar or other door-latching hardware
shall activate an audible signal at the door.
6. The unlatching shall not require more than one operalion.
A sign shall be provided on the door located above ~,nd within
12 inches (305 mm) of the panic bar or other door-latching hard-
ware reading:
KEEP PUSHING. THIS DOOR WILL OPEN IN
SECONDS. ALARM WILL SOUND.
Sign leltering shall be at least ! inch (25 mm) in hcighl and shall
have a stroke of not less than I/8 inch (3.2 mm).
Regardless of the means of deactivation, relocking of the
egress-control device shall be hy manual means only at Ihe door.
1003.3.1.11 Safety glazing identificalinn. Regardless of the
occupant load served, glass doors shall conform to thc rcquirc-
men,s specified in Section 2406.
1003.3.2 Gates.
1003.3.2.1 General. Gates serving a means of egress system
shall comply with the requirements of Scclion 1003.3.2.
1003.3.2.2 Detailed requirements. Gales used ~,s a component
in a means of egress system shall conform In the applicable
requirements of Section 1003.3.1.
EXCEPTION: Gates st, rrounding stadiums may be of thc horizo,~-
,al sliding or swinging type and may exceed the 4-foot (1219 mm) max-
,mum leaf width limitation.
1003.3.3 Stairways.
1003.3.3.1 General. Every stairway having two or more risers
serving any building or portion thereof shall comply with tile
requirements of Section 1003.3.3. For Ibc purposes of Section
1003.3.3, the term "stairway" shall in(It,de sis,rs, landi,~gs, hand-
rails and guardrails as applicable. Where .',isles in assembly roorns
have steps, they shall comply with tile requirements in Section
! 004.3.2.
EXCEPTION: Stairs or ladders used only In altcnd cquipmc~'~l or
window wells are exempt from the reqt,irements of Ibis seclicqL
For the purpose of this chapter, the lerm "step" shall mcan Ihosc
portions of the means of egress achieving a change in elew~lion by
means of a single riser. Individual steps shall comply with the
detailed requirements of this chapter thai specify applicability to
steps.
1003.3,3.2 Width. The width of stairways shall be determined as
specified in Section 1003.2.3, but such width shall not be less Ihan
44 inches (1118 mm), except as specified herein and in Chapter I I.
Stairways serving an occupant load less Ihan 50 shall not be less
than 36 inches (914 mm) in width.
Handrails may project into the required width a distance of
31/2 inches (89 mm) from each side of a stairway. Stringers and
other projections such as trim and similar decorative features may
project into the required width 11/2 inches (38 mm) from each side.
-3611-
1003.3.3.3 Rise and run. The rise of steps and stairs shall not be
less than 4 inches (102 mm) nor more than ? inches (178 mm). The
greatest riser height within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the
smallest by more than 3/8 inch (9.5 mm). Except as permitted in
Sections 1003.3.3.8.1, 1003.3.3.8.2 and 1003.3.3.8.3, the run
shall not be less than 11 inches (279 mm) as measured horizontally
between the vertical planes of the furthermost projection of adja-
cent treads or nosings. Stair treads shall be of uniform size and
shape, except the largest tread run within any flight of stairs shall
not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch (9.5 mm).
EXCEPTIONS: 1. Private steps and stairways serving an occupant
toad of less than l0 and stairways to unoccupied roofs may be
conslruclcd wilh an 8-inch-maximum (203 mm) rise and a 9-inch-
minimum (229 mm) run.
2. Where Ibc bottom or top riser adjoins a sloping public way, walk
or driveway having an established grade (other than natural earlh) and
serving as a landing, the bollom or top riser may be reduced along the
slope In less than 4 inches 002 mm) in height with ]he variation in
height ~f the bonom or top riser not In exceed 1 unil vertical in 12 units
horiznntal (8.3% slope) of stairway widlh.
1003.3.3.4 Headroom. Every stairway shall have a headroom
clearance of not less than 6 feet 8 inches (2032 mm). Such clear-
ances shall be measured vertically from a plane parallel and tan-
gent to Ihe slairway tread nosings to the soffit or other construction
~,llove at all points.
a dimension measured in the direction of travel not less than the
width of the stairway. Such dimension need not exceed 44 inches
(1118 mm) where the stair has a straight run. At least one inter-
mediate landing shall be provided for each 12 feet (3658 mm) of
vertical stairway rise measured between the horizontal planes of
adjacent landings. Landings shall be level except that exterior
landing~ may have a slope not to exceed I/4 unit vertical in 12 units
horizontal (2% slope). For landings with adjoining doors, see Sec-
lion 1003.3.1.7.
EXCElrHONS: I. In Group R, Division 3, and Group U Occupan-
cies and within individual units of Grm,p R, Division I Occupancies,
such lenglh need not exceed 36 inches (914 mm) where the stair has a
slraighl run.
2. Slairs serving an unoccupied roof are exempt from these require-
menls.
1003.3.3.6 IIandrails. Stairways shall have handrails on each
side, and every stairway required to be more than 88 inches (2235
mm) in width shall lie provided wilh not less Ihan one intermediate
handrail for each 88 inches (2235 mm) of required width. Inter-
mediate handrails shall be spaced approximately equally across
with tile entire width of the stairway.
EXCE'IVI'IONS: I. Stairways less Iha~l 44 inches (1118 mm) in
widlh or siairways serving one individual dwelling unit in Group R,
Division I or 3 Occupancy or a Group R, Division 3 congregate resi-
dence n'u,y have one handrail.
2. Private stairways 30 inches (762 mm) or less in height may have
a handrail on one side only.
3. Stairways having less Ihan four risers and serving one individual
dwelling unit in Group R, Division I or 3, or a Group R, Division 3 con-
gregate residence or Group U Occt,pancies need not have handrails.
Tile lop of handrails and handrail extensions shall not be placed
less than 34 inches (864 mm) nor more than 38 inches (965 mm)
above landings and the nosing of treads. Handrails shall be contin-
uous the full length of the stairs and, except for private stairways,
at least one handrail shall extend in the direction of the stair run not
less than 12 inches (305 mm) beyond the top riser nor less than
12 inches (305 mm) beyond the bottom riser. Ends shall be
returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends.
EXCEPTIONS: 1. Private stairways do not require handrail exten-
sions.
1-109
108.8-109.6 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
TABLE 1-A
reinspection foe in accordance with Table 1-A or as set forth in the
fee schedule adopted by the jurisdiction.
In instances where reinspection fees have been assessed, no
additional inspection of the work will be performed until the re-
quired fees have been paid.
109.1 Use and Occupancy. No building or structure shall be
used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classi-
fication of a building or structure or portion thereof shall be made
until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy
therefor as provided herein.
EXCEPTION: Group R, Division 3 and Group U Occupancies.
Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as
an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other
ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give au-
thority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other ordi-
nances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid.
109.2 Change in Use. Changes in the character or use of a build-
ing shall not be made except as specified in Section 3405 of this
code.
109.3 Certificate Issued. After the building official inspects the
building or structure and finds no violations of the provisions of
this code or other laws that are enforced by the code enforcement
agency, the building official shall issue a certificate of occupancy
that shall contain the following:
1. The building permit number.
2. The address of the building.
3. The name and address of the owner.
4. A description o( that portion of the building for which the
certificate is issued.
5. A statement that the described portion of the building has
been inspected for compliance with the requirements of this code
for the group and division of occupancy and the use for which the
proposed occupancy is classified.
6. The name of the building official.
109.4 Temporary Certificate. If the building official finds that
no substantial hazard will result from occupancy of any building
or portion thereof before the same is completed, a temporary cer-
tificate of occupancy may be issued for the use of a portion or por-
tions of a building or structure prior to the completion of the entire
building or structure.
109.5 Posting. The certificate of occupancy shall be posted in a
conspicuous place on the premises and shall not be removed ex-
cept by Ihe building official.
109.6 Revocation. The building official may, in writing, sus-
pend or revoke a certificate of occupancy issued under the provi-
sions of this code whenever the certificate is issued in error, or 0n
the basis of incorrect information supplied, or when it is deter-
mined that the building or structure or portion thereof is in viola-
tion of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this
code.
TABLE 1-A--BUILDING PERMIT FEES
TOTAL VALUATION FEE
$1.00 to $500.00 $23.50
$23.50 for the first $5110.00 plus $3.{)5 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and
$501.00 to $2,000.00 including $2,00t).00
$69.25 for the first $2,00{}.00 plus $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 and including $25,000.00
$391.75 for lite first $25,000.00 plus $10.10 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
to and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $643.75 for the first $50,00t).00 plus $7.1)0 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
to and including $100,000.00
$993.75 for the first $100,000.00 plus $5.60 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof,
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 to and including $5{)0,000.00
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,233.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $4.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction
thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00
$5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $3.65 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction
$1,000,001.00 and up thereof
Other Inspections and Fees:
norma[business hours ....................................................................... $47.00 per hour1
1.InspectionS(mtnimum charge--two°Utside of hours) ..... ' ~:J."/nfl ncr hour1
,~2.' Rcinspcction fees assessed under provisions of Section .~u~.* ................................................................ r 1
Inspections for which no fcc is specifically indicated ................................................................. $47.00 per hour
(minimum charge---one-half hour) ........ $47 00 mr hour1
Additional plan review required by changes, aoomons or rcwsmns to p~ans ................................................. ,-
(minimum charge---one-half hour) .... h Actual costs2
For use of outside consultants for plan checking aha inspections, or oot ..................................................
lOt the total hourly cost to thc jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supcrvision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of
the employees involved.
2Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs.
1--0
-3612-
107.6
1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 108.8
pc' mit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or
canceled before any plan reviewing is done.
The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee
paid except on written application filed by the original permittee
not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment.
SECTION 108 -- INSPECTIONS
108.1 General. All construction or work for which a permit is
required shall be subject to inspection by the building official and
all such construction or work shall remain accessible and exposed
for inspection purposes until approved by the building official. In
addition, certain types of construction shall have continuous in-
spection, as specified in Section 1701.5.
Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be construed to be
an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other
ordinances of the jurisdiction. Inspections presuming to give au-
thority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other
ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid.
It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to
remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes. Neither
the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense
entailed in the removal or replacement of any material required to
allow inspection.
A survey of the lot may be required by the building official to
verify that the structure is located in accordance with the approved
plans.
108.2 Inspection Record Card. Work requiring a permit shall
not be commenced until the permit holder or an agent of the permit
holder shall have posted or otherwise made available an inspec-
tion record card such as to allow the building official to conve-
niently make the required entries thereon regarding inspection of
the work. This card shall be maintained available by the permit
holder until final approval has been granted by the building
official.
require that every request for inspection be filed at least one work-
ing day before such inspection is desired. Such request may be in
writing or by telephone at the option of the building official.
It shall be the duty of the person requesting any inspections re-
quired by this code to provide access to and means for inspection
of such work.
108.4 Approval Required. Work shall not be done beyond the
point indicated in each successive inspection without first obtain-
ing the approval of the building official. The building official,
upon notification, shall make the requested inspections and shall
either indicate that portion of the construction is satisfactory as
completed, or shall notify the permit holder or an agent of the per-
mit holder wherein the same fails to comply with this code. Any
portions that do not comply shall be corrected and such portion
shall not be covered or concealed until authorized by the building
official.
~here shall be a final inspection and al~proval of all buildings
and structures when completed and ready for occupancy and use.
108.5 Required Inspections.
108.5.1 General. Reinforcing steel or structural framework of
any part of any building or structure shall not be covered or con-
cealed without first obtaining the approval of the building official.
Protection of joints and penetrations in fire-resistive assemblies I
shall not be concealed from view until inspected and approved.
The building official, upon notification, shall make the inspec-
tions set forth in the following sections.
108.5.2 Foundation inspection. To be made after excavations
for footings are complete and any required reinforcing steel is in
place. For concrete foundations, any required forms shall be in
place prior to inspection. Ali materials for the foundation shall be
on the job, except where concrete is ready mixed i. fi accordance
with approved nationally recognized standards, the concrete need I
not be on the job. Where the foundation is to be constructed of ap-
proved treated wood, additional inspections may be required by
the building official.
108.5.3 Concrete slab or under-floor inspection. To be made
after all in-slab or under-floor building service equipment, con-
duit, piping accessories and other ancillary equipment items are in
place, but before any concrete is placed or floor sheathing
installed, including the subfloor.
108.5.4 Frame inspection. To be made after the roof, all fram-
ing, fire blocking and bracing are in place and all pipes, chimneys
and vents are complete and the rough electrical, plumbing, and
heating wires, pipes and ducts are approved.
108.5.5 Lath or gypsum board inspection. To be made after all
lathing and gypsum board, interior and exterior, is in place, but be-
fore any plastering is applied or before gypsum board joints and
fasteners are taped and finished.
108.5.6 Final inspection. To be made after finish grading and
the building is completed and ready for occupancy.
108.6 Special Inspections. For special inspections, see Chapter
17.
108.7 Other Inspections. In addition to the called inspections
specified above, the building official may make or require other
inspections of any constrnction work to ascertain compliance with
the provisions of this code and other laws which are enforced by
the code enforcement agency.
108.8 Reinspectlons. A reinspection fee may be assessed for
each inspection or reinspection when such portion of work for
which inspection is called is not complete or when corrections
called for are not made.
This section is not to be interpreted as requiring reinspection
fees the first time a job is rejected for failure to comply with the
requirements of this code, but as controlling the practice of calling
for inspections before the job is ready for such inspection or re-
inspection. ..
Reinspection fees may be assessed when the inspection re~ord
card is not posted or otherwise available on the work site, the
approved plans are not readily available to the inspector, for fail-
ure to provide access on the date for which inspection is requested,
or for deviating from plans requiring the approval of the building
official.
To obtain a reinspection, the applicant shall file an application
therefor in writing on a form furnished for that purpose and pay the
-3613-
1003.3.1.3 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
1003.3.1.10
10C%3.1.3 Width and height. Every required exit doorw:ty serv-
ing an occupant load of 10 or more shall hu of a size Io permit the
installation of a door not less than 3 feet (914 mm) in nominal
width and not less than 6 feet 8 inches (2032 mm) in nominal
height. Where installed, exit doors shall he capable of opening
such that the clear width of the exil is not less than 32 inches (813
mm). In computing the exit width as required by Section 1003.2.3,
the net dimension of the doorway shall be used.
1003.3.1.4 Door leaf width. A single leaf of an exit door serving
an occupant load of 10 or more shall not exceed 4 feet (1219 mm)
in width.
1003.3.1.5 Swing and opening force. Exit doors serving an
occupant load of 10 or more shall be of the piw~ted, hahmccd or
side-hinged swinging type. Exit doors shall swing in the direction
of the path of exit travel where the area se~ed has an occupant
load of 50 or more. The door shall swing to the fully open posilion
when an opening force not to exceed 30 ponnds (133.45 N)
applied to the latch side. For other door opening fi}roes, sec Sec-
tion 905.3 and Chapter 11. See Section 3207 for doors swinging
over public property.
EXCE~IONS: 1. Group I, I)ivision 3 ()ccnpaucy used as a place
of delention.
2. Doors within or serving an individual dwelling nnil.
3. Special doors confi~rming lo Section 1003.3.1.2.
Double-acting doors shall not be used as exits where any of the
following conditions exist:
1. The occupant load served by the door is 100 or more.
2. The door is part of a fire asscmhly.
3. The door is part of a smoke- and draft-control assembly.
4. Panic hardware is required or provklcd on Ihe door.
A double-acting door shall he provided wilh a view panel ol' not
less than 200 square inches ((). 129
~'~6~e~el at:doom~e~a~dless of3he occupant Ioa~
11, the floor or landing shall not be more than ~/~ inch (12.7 mm)
lower than the threshold of the doorway. Where such access is not
required, the threshold shall not exceed I inch (25 mm). I.andings
shall be level except that exterior landings may have a slope not
exceed I/4 unit verlical in 12 mills horizonlal (2% slope).
EXCE~IONS: 1. In Gronp R, Division 3, and Group IJ Occnpan-
cies and within individual unils of Group R, Division I Occupancies:
I.I A door may open al Iht lop slop of an interior Ilighl ot
provided Ihc door does not swing over Ibc lop slop.
1.2 A door may open at a landing thru is not more than 8 inches
(203 mm) lower Ihan file floor level, provided Iht door
not swing over the landing.
1.3 Screen doors and slorm doors may swh~g over Mairs, Mops
or landings.
2. Doors se~ing building equipment moms Ihal arc ilol oormally
occopied.
1003.3.1.7 Landings at doors. Regardless of Iht occupant load
served, landings shall have a width nol less lhan lhe widlh of the
door or the width of the stairway served, whichever is greater.
Doors in the fully open position shall not reduce a required dimen-
sion by more than 7 inches (178 mm). Where a hmding serves an
occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall not rcdnce
the landing dimension to less than one half ils required wkllh.
~ndings shall have a length measured in the direction of Iravcl of
not less than 44 inches (1118 mm).
1-108
-3614-
EXCEPTION: In Gmnp R, Division 3, and Group U Occnpancies
and wilhin i,ulividuz,I unils of Group R, Division I Occupancies, such
length need not exceed 36 inches (914 mm).
A landing that has no adjoining door shall comply with the
reqniremenls of Section 1003.3.3.5.
1003.3.1.8 ~pe of lock or latch. Regardless of the occupant
load served, exit doors shall be openable from the inside without
file use of a key or any special knowledge or effort.
EXCE~IONS: 1. In Groups A, Division 3; B; F; M and S Occu-
pancies and in all churches, key-locking hardware may be used on the
main exil where the main exil consisls of a single door or pair of doors
where Ihere is a readily visible, durable sign on or adjacent Io Ihe door
slating, "Tills DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING
BUSINESS IIOURS." The sign shall he in letters not less than I inch
(25 mm) high on a contrasting background. When onlocked, the single
door or bolh leaves of a pair of doors must be free to swing without
operation of any lalching device. The nsc of Ihis excep~n may be
rewaked hy thc huilding official for due cause.
2. Exil doors from individual dwelling nnils; Group R, Division 3
ctmgrcgatc residences; aod gncst rooms of Group R Occupancies hav-
ing an occupant load of 10 or less may be provided with a night latch,
dead boll or security chain, provided such dcviccs arc openablc from
Iht inside wilhout Ihc nsc of a key or tool and mounted at a height not
lo cxccct148 inches (1219 mm) above thc finished floor.
Manually operated edge- or surface-mounted flush bolts and
snrfacc bolts or any other lype of device that may be used to close
or restrain the door other than by operation of the locking device
shall not be used. Where exit doors are used in pairs and approved
automatic flnsh holls are nsed, the door leaf having the automatic
flnsh bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware.
The unlatching of any leaf shall not reqnire more than one opera-
lion.
EXCEIrFIONS: I. Group R, Division 3 Occupancies.
2. Where a pair of doors seining a room not normally occupied is
needed for Ihe movement of equipment, manoally operated edge- or
surfacc-monnled holls may be nsed.
1003.3.1.9 Panic hardware. Panic hardware, where installed,
shall comply wilh the requirements of UBC Standard 10-4. The
activating member shall be mounted at a height of not less than
30 inches (762 mm) nor more than 44 inches (1118 mm) above the
floor. The mfiatching fi,rce shall not exceed 15 ponnds (66.72 N)
when applied in the direclion of travel.
Where pivoted or bahmced doors are used and panic hardware is
required, panic hardware shall be of the push-pad type and the pad
shall not extend across more than one half of the width of the door
incasurc(I from Ibc lalch side.
1003.3.1.10 Special egress-control devices. When approved by
thc huildiog official, exit doors in Group B; Group F; Group I, Di-
vision 2; Group R, Division I congrcgale residences serving as
group-care facilities and Gronp S Occupancies may be equipped
wilh approved lisled special egress-control devices of the time-
delay ~ype, provided lhe building is prolected throughout by an
approved anlomalic sprinkler system and an approved automatic
smoke-deleclion system. Such devices shall conform to all the fol-
lowing:
I. The egress-control device shall automatically deactivate
npon activation of either the sprinkler system or the smoke-detec~
lion system.
2. The egress-control device shall automatically deactivate
npon loss of electrical power to any one of the following:
2.1 The egress-control device itselL
2,2 The smoke-detection system.
2.3 Means of egress illumination as required by Section
1003.2.9.
PLANNING REPORT
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP
DATE: April 30, 2002
SUBJECT: Variance Request
OWNER: John and Kathy Aquilina
CASE NUMBER: 02-11
HKG FILE NUMBER: 02-05
LOCATION: 3030 Island View Drive
ZONING: Residential District R- lA
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted a request for a sideYard setback variance. The
variance request is as follows:
Deck sideyard setback
Proposed Required variance
1.2 ft. 4ft. 2.8 ft.
In 1997, the Aquilinas weie issued a building permit to construct a new single family dwelling at
3030 Island View Drive. The survey submitted with the building permit apPlication indicates a
"deck" and a "future deck" on the lakeside of the house. Building plans for the deck however,
were not included with the building permit application for the house, consequently the
construction of th~ deck was never authorized or approved. In all likelihoOd the deck was built at
the same time as the new home which received the Certificate of OccuPancY in 1998. It is also
relevant to note the survey indicated the deck would be conforming, but was built differently.
The house is a single-stow design with a lakeside walkOut. The deck is located on the l~eside
of the house and is at the same elevation as the main floor extending the width of the house and
approximately 14 feet deep, 'The enCrOaching por~ibn 'extends 5 feet past the south wall of the
house to accommodate a stairway located i~ the sideyard.
Decks are considered to be part of principal structure and are subject to the same yard setbacks
except under certain circumstances as outlined in SectiOn 350:440 Subd. 3(C) uKedtgize_0,~r~
and Open Space. This section states:
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3615-
p. 2
g02-I~ Aquilina Variance
~P~l:',sO, zoo2
Decks, balconies, and the like, attached to the principal building which ex:tend in
elevation above the height of the ground floor elevation of the principal building; and
decks, balconies, and the like, detached from the principal building and exceeding 30
inches in height above the surrounding grade provided they do not extend within ten U O)
feet of-~ne rear lot line or extend beyond side yard sand front yard accessory.touilding
setbacks. On lakeshore lots, such structures shah comply with the lakeshore setback of
the principal structure.
Staff's interpretation of this section as it relates to the Aquilina deck can be summarized as
follows:
Decks are subject to the same setback requirements as the principal structure.
Specifically with the Aquilina deck, a 6 feet side yard setback and a 50 feet s~tbaCk frOm
the ordinary high water of Lake Minnetonka is required.
Under certain circumstances the COde. allows for encroachments intO req~red Setback
areas. Section 350:440 Subd. 3(C) allows certain structures to encroach into typical yard
setback areas. There are three scenarios where decks and other similar structures are
allowed:different setbacks than the principal structure:
Decks that are above the elevation of the ground / first story elevation, meaning
that they are likely a secog,d., story'deck or somewhere in between the 1't and 2~d
stoW. (doesn't qualify in th~~ base)
detached deck,: similar, to what the shoreland management ordinance terms a
':~ater:oriented" s~ettire. (doesn't qualify in this case)
Any deck that is 30 inches: or more aboVe the grade which could be a groUnd /
first story: . deck. when the 'basement is a ~"walk out" / has ,daYlight windows."
(qualifies as an encroachment in this case) '
The stairs leading to the deck from sideyard that have a 4.9 feet setback are an allowable
encroachment under. Subd. 3(B) in this section.
Uncovered'porches, stoOPs` or similar entrance Xtructures not exceeding 32 'square feet
Whidh do not eXtend in elevation ab09e the heigh/ of the ground floor elevati°n. ~o~'
principal building, and steps that d° not extend to a distance of less than two (2) fe~t
from any lot line. (the stairs satisfy this code section)
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3616-
p. 3
#02-11 ~qui[ina ?arianc¢
April 30, 2002
DISCUSSION: The application for an "after the fact" variance is certainly an acceptable
approach as a possible remedy to the situation. Although the deck is already built, the criteria by
which the variance is reviewed are still the same and the review of the case should not focus on
the fact that the deck is built. A built condition is part of the discussion but should not be viewed
as reason alone to approve or deny the request. Any recommendation must determine if a
hardship or practical difficulty is present that would warrant a deviation from ~the regulations.
Section 350:530 identifies 6 criteria for granting a variance in order to provide:relief where the
ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property for the use of land.
For this case, a review of the conditions assuming the deck was not built might be an appropriate
approach to determine if a practical difficulty or hardship is present. When the survey showing
the future deck was submitted, it indicated the deck could be built in conformance with the code.
If the applicant were submitting a request to build the deck today, how would it be reviewed?
What conditions are present that warrant the granting of a variance?
Staff cannot recommend the granting of a variance because there is no apparent hardship or
practical difficulty present. The problem is the direct result of actions created by the applicant
and not a circumstance created by the shape of the lot, topography of the site, or location of the
house. It is important to make this distinction in this case because it does not appear that
requiring the deck to conform is impractical.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council
deny the variance to allow the deck to remain in its current state and would further recommend
the following conditions:
1. The deck meet current code requirements including a 4 feet side yard setback for that
portion located in the rear yard.
A Building Permit application for the existing deck and any needed improvements to
reflect a conforming condition be submitted for review and approval by the Building
Official subject to associated fees and penalties.
3. An "as-built" survey be prepared and submitted to the City at the completion of the
project.
Findings of fact in support of the recommendation for denial are as follows:
1. The nonconforming deck condition is the direct result of actions of the applicant.
2. There are no special conditions present that are the result lot size, shape or topography.
3. The granting of a variance would confer special privileges to the applicant not afforded
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3617-
p. 4
gO2-11 Aquilina Variance
April 30, 2002
to other single-family property oWners.
4. The granting of a variance would be materially, detrimental to the spirit and iX~tent of the
Zoning Ordinance.
5,~ The granting of a variance would "legitim/ze' the eXisting deck encroachment and
continue to negatively impact to the adjacent property by limiting sight lines and the
separation between homes. ~'
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-3618-
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CiTY OF MOUND
S341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 553~4
Phone: 952-472-0607, Fax: 952-472-0620
ApplicatIon
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
City Council Date:
CitY planner D-NR
City Engineer PARK
Public Works Other
SUBJECT Address.
PROPERTY Lot_
.LEG~ Block
DESC. Subdivision
PROPER~ Name ....
OWNEE Address.
Phone
APPLICANT Name ...
(IF OTHER Address
THAN PhOne
.OWNER) (H),,
,,
Has an application ever been made forzoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedun for
property? ~'es, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copis
of resolutions.
la.q(,, C,4-.¢[= ,%-
Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
-3619-
Variance Appilca~on;. P', 2 °f. 3..
Case No.
'3,
De the .existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district
in which' it is located? Yes (), No (), if no, spec, ify each non-COnforming use (desorlbe reason for
variance request, I.e. SetbaCk:; lot area, etc:): ~.
............................................. ~':": .................................. "'"REQUIRED ................ REQUESTED
(or ~Jatlng)
Front Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E W) ft..
Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft ft.
Rear Yai-d: ( N 8 E W ) ft, ~ ft..
Lakeside; (N S E W ) .., ..: ft .... ;~, :.~. ft.
.:(NSEW) ft, fi,
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover:
sqff
sq ft _sq ff
V~iANCE ..........
: sq ff
sq ft
Does the/.leresent use of the property confo~ :to all reguia§ons for the ZOning district in which It is located?
Yes ~, No (). If no, specify each non-ConformingdSe:
Which ui~i~iU'e P'hYsi~l ~-r?~;~i~-~'~f'~'~· S'~l~'j~'Pi;~pe~'pr'even~ its m'a'sona-I~i~"~'~' ~or any of the uses
permitted in that zoning district?
(v)/tOO narroW ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation
( ) too shallow ( ~/'shape (~3ther: specify
Please describe:
Revised 04/24/01
-3620-
Variance Appll=atl0n, P. $ of S
Was the hardship described'above created by the' action of anyone having property Interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). if yes; explain:
?
-- 7.
.WaS .the.hards..bip created by any other man-made change, such as the :relocation of a road?
Yes (), No (~. If yes, explain:
Are the conditions of ~ardsh!p for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in
this petition? Yesj~, No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
I ce~ that all of the above statements and the statements confined in any required papom or plans to be
subml~ed herowlth are true and accu~te,' I ~n~ont to the ~n~ in' or upon the premises dos~ibed in this
applic~on by ~ny ~6tho~d offi~l of~o ~i¢ of Mound for ~,
and -removing such notices as may be ~~d. ~ law.
r
Owner's .Signature Date
. Applicant'S signature · _Da~e.
Revised 0472470
-3621 -
CITY OF MOUND
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) .
· LOT AREA [ O o~ ~ ~, · , SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ..............................
LOT AREA ' ., , SQ. FT. X '15% = (for detached buildings onlY)... .......... ~ ....
' Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as ouUimed in,Zoning
Ordinance SecttDn 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1 (eee back) A lan must be su
WIDTH SQ FT
HOUSE
DETACHED BUILDINGS
(GAP. AGE/SHED)
~RigEWAY, PARKING
ETC~
TOTAL HOUSE
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ...............................
X
X ~
DECKS Opan:.dec. ke (1/4" ri~n,
opening betw~in boaFd~ WiiA a
13ervious aurfaoe under-~ not
oountecl as barrio, over.
TOTAL, DRIVEWAY'~ ETC.. .......................................
X =
X =
X =
TOTAL DECK. ................
X =
TOTAL'HARDOOVER / IMPERVIOUI~ ~IURFACE ........................... ' ..........
UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ..~, ...................
PREPARED BY ~'
DATE z.[.- 2.. - o Z-
-3622-
CITY OF MOUND
April 15, 2002
534-1 MAYWOOD ROAD
MC)UND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FA~,K: (952) 472-0620
WEEB: www. cRyofmound.com
John and Kathy Acquilina
3030 Island View Drive
Mound, MN 55364
Variance Application - 3030 Island View Drive
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Acquilina:
This letter is in regard to the variance application forthe property located at 3030 Island
View Drive that was submitted on or about April 2, 2002. Based on review by City s-taft,
you are advised that the application has been deemed to be complete and will be
forwarded to the Planning Commission for review at its May 6, 2002 meeting.
In the event you have any questions regarding any of this information, please contact me
directly at (952) 472-3190. I look forward to working with you.
Community Development Director
J~ printed on recycled paper
-3623-
i
Il:his
DECK INFORMATION
City of Mound, 5341.,Maywood Road, Mound, MN
Phone: g52-472-0607 Fax: 952-472-0679
55364
B¢lding Permits A permit is required for any deck that is attached to a bUilding or that is 30 inches
or more above grade, or that is part of the exiting system such as a landing outside any door.
Frost Footings Any deck that is attached to a dwelling or garage that has frost footings must also...
have frost footings.
Guardrails All decks that are 30 inches or more above grade must be protected by a guardrail. Such
guardrail shall be a minimum of 36 inches in height. Open guardrails and stair railings shall have
intermediate rails or an ornamental pattern such that a 6 inch diameter sphere cannot pass through -
LESS than a 6" opening.
StairWay S.Decs (UBC 3306)
Minimum Width 36 Inches (private stairways serving an occupant load of less than
49 persons - Section B)
Minimum Run 9 Inches
Maximum Rise 8 Inches
Headroom 6 feet 8 inches (measured vertically from a plane parallel and tangent to
the stairwaytread nosing to the soffit above at all Points. SectiOn p)
Handrails Shall be placed not less than 34 inches nor more than 38 inches above
the nosing:of treads. Rail end shall be returned or terminate in neWel
posts or-safety terminals. Note attached handout for acceptable designs.
HANDRAILS ON RESIDENTIAL STAIRWAYS AND CONCRETE sTEps; MUST' BE'~ROViDED IF FOUR OR
MORE RISERS. AlSo, provide on both sides if open stairway - Section J.
Handrails projecting from. awall shal...=have a space of no.t !ess than 1 !/2 inches between the
wall and the =handrail. The handgdp portion of handrails shall be.not less that 1 1/2 inches nor
more than 2 inch&S in crOSs-sectioi~al
dimension and shall have a smooth surface.with no sharp corners.
Landings Every landing shall have a minimum dimension of"36 inches. A door
swinging .o~r a. landing shall not redu ce.,the: width ~of the landing to less
than One-half its required width at any position in its swing nor by more
than 7 inches when fully open,, UBC 3306(g).
Cantilevered or Overhanging Decks Maximum of 2 foot cantilevered joist. Generally, the jo st that
cantilever must extend two times the distance into the structure that they project outside the strUcture
or an engineered design may be required.
Live Load All decks shall be designed to suppoK a load of 60 lbs per square foot.
Deck Handout
01/31/02
-3633-
Flashing All connections betweendeck and dwelling shall be weatherstripped. Any cuts in exterior
finish shall be flashed oi' Caulked. '
Joist Hangers.Header jOist more than Six feet Iongand tail joiSt over 12 feet:Iong shall be supported
by approved framing anChom such aS jOist hangers.~ ~
Wood Required All exposed wood used in the construction of decks is required to be of approved
wood of. natural resistanoe t decay (radWOod, cedar, etc.) Or treated wood. This inclUdes.l~0sts,:
.beams, joists and decking.
Requi,red WindoWS. May Open into a roofed perch where the p0rdh 1)ab~s a Street, yard' Or CouK;
2) has a Ceiling height of not less than 7 feet, and 3) has a longer side at least 65%' open and
unobstructed (open sides may be closed with insect screening).
DEFINITIONS
Arbor
latticework covered with climbing shrubs or vines.
Balcony
a platform that projects from the wall of a building and is enclose'd bY a ParaPet
or railing. .
Breezeway a roofed open passage connecting two buildings, or halves ora building.
Deck a fiat, floored,, roOfleSS' area adjoining a hOuse.
Gazebo detached, free-standing percher screen house~
Patio
Patio Cover
Porch
TerraCe
Trellis
a cou... ~.rtyar:d open to theSky, a terrace,
one-story roof structure open on one or more sides. May be attached or
det~ched~ .P,~ti6 c6'vecs.:~hali~ be "u~e'd' for re.er~ational, 6Utd0Oi. iiving pUi~Oses
anfl':ho~as'~°rts, garage~', s~age r60~ °rh'abita~ble room-s. :~.'
a roofed, unheated area adjoining a house. May be open, screened or glazed.
a relatively'level.earth area Or pl'affo~:'adjoinihg a' building.
same as arb°i~ except d°e§~'not inclUde vines.
INSPECTIONs
Pier Footing
Final Inspection
To b'e made after holes are excavated, but before any Concre{e~is pi'aced.
After work :is completed, indluding guardrails, StairS, and handrails, etc.
Deck Handout
01/31/02
-3634-
SMOKE DETECTORS - are required to be updated when value` of any'perrnitte~ 'project is
valued at $1000 or mom. Please provide for proper inspection to verify if needed.
ZONING REQUIREMI=NT~ (City Code Excerpts)
Section 350:310, Definitions, The following words and terms, whenever they occur in this
Ordinance, are defined as follOws:
Subd. 1. Accessory. Building, An accessory building Shall' beconsidered Co be an integral
part of the principal structure unless it 'is five (5)feet or more from the principal structure or use
and:providing that the structure exceeds 120 square feet;
Subd. 37. Deck. A platform supported by an open system of posts, beams and other
structural elements,.
Subd; '-132, Structure. Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires more or
less permanent location on the ground or attached to something having a permanent location
on the ground, except the following: (1~)on-grade stairways and steps notexceeding 6 feet in
width and landings connected to such stairways or stepsnot~.exceeding 6 feet in width and 6
.feet in length; (2) boardwalks not ·
exceeding 6 feet in width; (3) driveways not exceeding 20 feet in width; (4) sidewalks not
exceeding 6 feet inwidth; and (5) retaining walls not exceeding 4'feet in height.'
Section 350:435, AcCeSsory BUildings,
Subd. 5. Accessory. Residential Building Setback Requirements;
Side Yard Setbacks. A detached accessory building may be located within four
(4) feet ofthe side IOt~line in the rear yard with a minimUm Of a six (6) foot
Setback in side.:yard location; :On through' ~and,lakeshore lots, a detached
accesso~"bUilding may be,located within f0Ur:~(zt)feet off'the side lot line in the
Whenever a garage is so designed that the doors face a side street or side
property: ii-ne; thedistance between:thedoors and;the property line shall be
twen~ (20)feet or more.
Fro'nt Yard SetbaCkS:· AII~ accesso'~ ~buiidihg's shall ,meet the same front yard
setback requirements as the principai~,,bUilding; exeept for lakeshore and through
lots. For detached garages on a lakeshore or through lots, a minimum twenty
(20) foot frot~'tyard 'setbaCk:is required if:the garage door(s) open to the street;
an ~eight (8) f00t fr0nt:'yard ~etba~k iS';,required if the garage door(s) open to the
side lot line.
Co
RearSetbaCk. A detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet
of the rear 10t line, ·
LakeShOre Setback. Detached accessory buildings must maintain a 50 foot
setback from the ordinary high water..~
Deck Handout
01/31/02
-3635-
Section 350:440,.
Subd. 3.
A.
Required Yards and O_Den .Spacm. ~. . : .
The following shall not be considered encroachments on yard r~quirements.
Chimneys, window air conditioners, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels,
ornamental features; mechanical devices,: cornices, ·eaves, gutters, and the like·,
provided they do not extend more than two (2) feet into the required yard ·area.
Uncovered porches~ stoops or. similar.entrance structures .not e~ceeding 32
sou.are feet which do not extend in ··elevation .above the height o1: the ground floor
elevation of the pdncipalbuilding, and stepsthat do not extend to a distance of
less than two (2) feet from any lot line.
C. Decks, balconies, and the like, attached to the principal building which extend in
elevation above the height of the ground floor elevation of the principal building;
and, decks; balconies, and the like, detached from the principal building and
exceeding 30 inches in height above the surrounding .grade provided they do not
e~end .within: ten (t0) feet of the rear lot line or extend:beyond side yard and
front.yardaccessory building setbacks~.' On lakeshore lots, such structures shall
comply with the lakeshore setback of the principal structure.
D. Detached decks or similar structures which do not,extend above 30 inches in
elevation above the height of the surrounding grade and do not extend to a
distance of less than two (2) feet from:any lot:line, On:lakeshore iotsi such
structures shall comply with the lakeshore setback of the principal structure.
Section 350:620 (all districts)
. D. Impervious surface coverage~of lots shall not ex~eed 30 percent of the lot area.
Open.pa~emed decks and,stairways: shall beCOunted as 50. percent impervious
cover .providi,ng that. they am installed· over a permeable surface. Those
constructed over an impermeable surface or are impermeable themselves shall
be counted as 100% impervious cover.
2, ~..Water~oriented~Accesso~. Structures, ~Eaoh Iot.mayhave one
water-oriented accessory structure .on private iakeshore not meeting the
normal structure setback in Section 350:1225, Subd. 3.A. 1. of this
ord nanceifthe water, oriented a¢~eSS0~.structure complies with the
followingPmvisions: .... ~' .:: ~
· . ~; . : ~!~ ,.~;. : .. = ~,,
a. ,.:,:: An at-grade deck::is allowed providing that it does not occupy an
area:greater:than :259 square feet and~ must not exceed thirty (30)
inches above grade at any point.
Atock.box is allowed providing that it~dees,:not have a total floor
area exceeding twenty (20) square feet and does not exceed four
(4) feet in height. Where possible, lock boxes shall be positioned
such that the narrowest'side of {he structure is parallel to the
ordinary high water line~
Deck Handout
01/31/02
-3636-
Deck Handout
01/31/02
Ce
The setback of water-oriented accessory structure s from the
ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet.
Water-6ri'ented a¢cesso'~ structures must be treated to reduce
visibility as viewed from public waters and adjaceat shorelands by
vegetation, topography, increased setbacks or colc~r, assuming
summer, leaf-on conditions.
Stairways. LiftS.'and Landings, StairWays and lifts are the preferred
alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and
down bluffs and steep slopeS to shOre areaS; stai~ays and lifts must
meet all of'the following design requirementS:
Stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width.on residential
lots. Wider Stairways may: be used for commercial properties,
public 0pen.spacerecreational pmperUes, and pla nned
development areas,
bo
Landings for stairways and lifts on residential lots must not exceed
32 square feet in area. Landings larger than 32 square feet may
be used for commercial properties, public open-space recreational
properties, and planned development areas.
c. Canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings..
Stai~aYs, lifts, and landings may be either constructed above the
ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they
are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil
etosi0n.
Stairways, lifts, and landings must be located in the most visually
inconsPicuouS portion~of lotS, asviewed frOm the surface of the
public water assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, whenever
practical.
Facilities such as ramps, lifts, or mobility paths for physically
handid~pped PerSohs are also ~lldwed for achieving access to
sliore.areas, provided that..:they compl.y with the dimensional and
perfor~ance'stah'dards~ ofsubttems (a) to (e) ih~.~addition to the
¢e~:dlimments of.Minnesota Regulations, Cha~ter 1340,
Specific Standards:
Impervious surface coverage of lots in residential zones'shall not exceed'
30 percent of the lot area. Open"patterneddecks and stairways sl~'all be
counted as 50% impervious cover providing that they are installed over a
permeable surface. Those constructed over an impermeable surface or
are impermeable themselves shall be counted as 100% impervious cover.
-3637-
-3638-
mm 0
-3639-.
Ct'
~ .~~ :.: ~.
-3640-
-3641 -
Z
2000
500'0
* 6000
* 7000
* 8000
* 9000
~0000
11000
* 12000
13000
* 14000
t 1~000
* 17000
* 18000
* 19000
* 20000'
e 21000
* 22000
* 23000
* 24000
'* 25000
* 29000
* 30000
****************************************************************************
NOTE =
1,
DATE;: 02 -;25 o1987
-3643-
t -3644-
CITY OF MOUND
HARDCOVER cAL~uLA~oNs '
( MP RViOU URrAC C0 R'AGE)
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
OWNER'S NAME:
LOT AREA
LOT AREA
LOT AREA
SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all'lots) . ............. I
SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record'*) .......
SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only)
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1 225,Subd.. 6. B. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official.
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
HOUSE X =
DETACHED BLD. G-S
(GARAGE/SHED)
· DRIVEWAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
DECKS Open decks (1/4" min.
TOTAL HOUSE
X ~
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC '
opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are
not counted ss hardcover
OTHER
TOTAL DECK
X
TOTAL OTHER
=
'OTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
UNDER /OVER (indicate difference) ............................... I
PREPARED BY DATE
-3645-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: JULY 18, 2002
TO: KANDIS HANSON, CITY MANAGER
FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: 2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
BID RESULTS
MFRA File No. 13677
Attached is the Bid Tabulation for the 2002 Storm Sewer Improvement Project,
which was bid on July 17, 2002. The low bid of $321,233.00 was submitted by
Dave Perkins Contracting of Andover. The Engineers estimate for this project was
$284,805.00. Because the low bid is substantially over the estimate, we are still in
the process of evaluating the unit prices and exploring options: therefore a final
recommendation on the contract award will not be presented until the Council
meeting on July 23, 2002.
15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MN 55447
-3646-
JCAMERON@MFRA.COM
(763)476-6010 FAX (763) 476-8532
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
iTM [
iSECTION 1 - SWENSON PARK
Remove 21" CMP
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Remove Storm Sewer Structure
Remove Bituminous Surface
Remove Concrete Curb
12" RCP - Class IV
2 l" RCP - Class III
24" RCP - Class III
30 RC Arch Pipe - Class IV
30" Arch Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
Granular Foundation Material (if required)
48" Storm Sewer Manhole
48" Storm Sewer M.H. constructed over existing pipe
60" Storm Sewer M.H. constructed over existing pipe
72" Catch Basin M.H. with sump
Concrete curb and gutter
Class 5 Gravel - 100% crushed quarry rock
Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 31
Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 41
Topsoil Borrow (if required)
Sod
Remove Sediment at Lake Outlet
Total Section I
SECTION 2 = EMERALD DRIVE/GLENDALE ROAD
1 Remove Bituminous Surface
2 Remove Concrete Curbs
3 Remove Concrete Apron
4 Tree Removal - 4" and larger
5 12" RCP - Class IV
6 15" RCP - Class IV
7 24" RCP Arch Pipe - Class III
8 24" Arch Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
9 Granular Foundation Material (if required)
10 48" Storm Sewer Manhole with sump
11 48" Catch Basin Manhole
12 2' x 3' Catch Basin
13 Class 5 Gravel - 100% crushed quarry rock
14 Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 31
15 Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 41
16 Concrete Curb and Gutter
17 Concrete Driveway Apron
18 Topsoil Borrow
19 Sod
Total Section 2
BID TAB
07/17/02
CITY OF MOUND
2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
MFRA #13677
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DAVE PERKINS
I QU^N TYIUNxTI TPmCEI TOT 'IUNXTP C .I
500.0 LF 8.00 $ 4,000.00 10.00 $ 5,000.00
4.0 EA 250.00 $ 1,000.00 650.00 $ 2,600.00
670.0 SY 5.00 $ 3,350.00 3.00 $ 2,010.00
130.0 LF 5.00 $ 650.00 5.00 $ 650.00
82.0 LF 35.00 $ 2,870.00 25.00 $ 2,050.00
373.0 LF 40.00 $ 14,920.00 38.00 $ 14,174.00
283.0 LF 55.00 $ 15,565.00 56.00 $ 15,848.00
495.0 LF 80.00 $ 39,600.00 94.00 $ 46,530.00
1.0 EA 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
150.0 TN 10.00 $ 1,500.00 18.00 $ 2,700.00
2.0 EA 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00
4.0 EA 2,250.00 $ 9,000.00 2,800.00 $ 11,200.00
1.0 EA 2,750.00 $ 2,750.00 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00
1.0 EA 3,750.00 $ 3,750.00 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00
130.0 LF 20.00 $ 2,600.00 20.00 $ 2,600.00
300.0 TN 18.00 $ 5,400.00 18.00 $ 5,400.00
73.0 TN 80.00 $ 5,840.00 125.00 $ 9,125.00
60.0 TN 85.00 $ 5,100.00 125.00 $ 7,500.00
80.0 CY 15.00 $ 1,200.00 15.00 $ 1,200.00
2,600.0 SY 3.50 $ 9,100.00 3.00 $ 7,800.00
30.0 CY 20.00 $ 600.00 20.00 $ 600.00
$ 134,795.00 $ 151,387.00
300.0 SY 5.00 $ 1,500.00 3.00 $ 900.00
70.0 LF 5.00 $ 350.00 5.00 $ 350.00
60.0 SF 2.50 $ 150.00 5.00 $ 300.00
1.0 EA 300.00 $ 300.00 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
25.0 LF 35.00 $ 875.00 45.00 $ 1,125.00
247.0 LF 40.00 $ 9,880.00 55.00 $ 13,585.00
300.0 LF 70.00 $ 21,000.00 88.00 $ 26,400.00
1.0 EA 1,750.00 $ 1,750.00 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00
100.0 TN 10.00 $ 1,000.00 18.00 $ 1,800.00
1.0 EA 2,250.00 $ 2,250.00 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00
2.0 EA 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00
2.0 EA 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00
115.0 TN 18.00 $ 2,070.00 18.00 $ 2,070.00
30.0 TN 80.00 $ 2,400.00 150.00 $ 4,500.00
27.0 TN 85.00 $ 2,295.00 150.00 $ 4,050.00
70.0 LF 20.00 $ 1,400.00 25.00 $ 1,750.00
60.0 SF 5.00 $ 300.00 15.00 $ 900.00
50.0 CY 15.00 $ 750.00 15.00 $ 750.00
750.0 SY 5.00 $ 3,750.00 5.00 $ 3,750.00
$ 59,020.00 $ 74,930.00
-3647-
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
BID TAB
07/17/02
CITY OF MOUND
2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
MFRA #13677
QUANTITY
Clearing and Grubbing
Remove existing 24" RCP and Apron
Remove Bituminous Surface
Remove Concrete Curb
24" RCP - Class III
27" RCP - Class III
27" Concrete Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
Granular Foundation Material (if required)
48" Storm Sewer Manhole
0 Extra Depth Manhole
11 Bituminous Patch
12 Concrete Curb and Gutter
13 Import and Place Fill
14 Topsoil Borrow
15 Seed and Mulch
16 Wood Fiber Blanket
17 Erosion Control Fence
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
DAVE PERKINS
I IT[ UHIT PRICE1
TOTAL _IuNIT PRICE[ TOTAL
1.0 LS 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00
1.0 LS 300.00 $ 300.00 800.00 $ 800.00
65.0 SY 5.00 $ 325.00 3.00 $ 195.00
20.0 LF 5.00 $ 100.00 5.00 $ 100.00
78.0 LF 55.00 $ 4,290.00 56.00 $ 4,368.00
186.0 LF 60.00 $ 11,160.00 64.00 $ 11,904.00
1.0 EA 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
50.0 TN 10.00 $ 500.00 18.00 $ 900.00
1.0 EA 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00
4.7 LF 100.00 $ 470.00 100.00 $ 470.00
65.0 SY 15.00 $ 975.00 40.00 $ 2,600.00
20.0 LF 20.00 $ 400.00 30.00 $ 600.00
250.0 CY 10.00 $ 2,500.00 10.00 $ 2,500.00
50.0 CY 15.00 $ 750.00 15.00 $ 750.00
1.0 LS 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
250.0 SY 3.50 $ 875.00 3.00 $ 750.00
35.0 LF 4.00 $ 140.00 5.00 $ 175.00
Total Section 3
$ 32,285.00
$ 35,212.00
SECTION 4 - BARTLETT BOULEVAP,~
Remove Bituminous Surface 85.0 SY 5.00 $ 425.00 3.00 $ 255.00
Remove Concrete Curb 60.0 LF 5.00 $ 300.00 5.00 $ 300.00
12"R.C.P. Class 5 87.0 LF 45.00 $ 3,915.00 75.00 $ 6,525.00
2' x 3' Catch Basin 3.0 EA 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00
Connect to existing structure 1.0 LS 500.00 $ 500.00 750.00 $ 750.00
Bituminous Patch 85.0 SY 15.00 $ 1,275.00 40.00 $ 3,400.00
Concrete Curb and Gutter 60.0 LF 30.00 $ 1,800.00 35.00 $ 2,100.00
Topsoil Borrow 16.0 CY 15.00 $ 240.00 15.00 $ 240.00
Sod 130.0 SY 5.00 $ 650.00 5.00 $ 650.00
Total Section 4
$ 13,605.00
$ 18,720.00
1 Clear and Grub
2 Site Grading Construction
3 Skimmer Structure with Intake Pipe
4 Riprap (Existing 18" RCP)
Seed and Mulch
Total Section 5
1.0 LS 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
1.0 LS 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
1.0 EA 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00
4.0 CY 75.00 $ 300.00 100.00 $ 400.00
1.0 LS 500.00 $ 500.00 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
$ 12,300.00
$ 9,700.00
Common Excavation 1.0 LS 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00
24" CMP Aprons with Riprap 2.0 EA 750.00 $ 1,500.00 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00
Riprap (Existing 24"RCP) 4.0 CY 75.00 $ 300.00 100.00 $ 400.00
Seed and Mulch 1.0 LS 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00
Total Section 6
SECTION 7 - DAKOTA RAIl.
Clear and Grub
21" RCP - Class IV
21" RCP Class IV - Jacked
21" Concrete Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
~5
Seed and Mulch
Total Section 7
Total
1.0
28.0
40.0
2.0
1.0
$ 11,800.00
LS 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
LF 50.00 $ 1,400.00
LF 325.00 $ 13,000.00
EA 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00
LS 500.00 $ 500.00
$ 21,000.00
$ 284,805.00
$ 9,100.00
1,800.00 $ 1,800.00
78.00 $ 2,184.00
350.00 $ 14,000.00
1,500.00 $ 3,000.00
1,200.00 $ 1,200.00
$ 22,184.00
$ 321,233.00
-3648-
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
BID TAB
07/17/02
CITY OF MOUND
2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
MFRA #13677
ITEM
SECTION 1 ~ SWENSON PARK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Remove 21" CMP
Remove Storm Sewer Structure
Remove Bituminous Surface
Remove Concrete Curb
12" RCP - Class IV
21" RCP - Class III
24" RCP - Class III
30 RC Arch Pipe - Class IV
30" Arch Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
Granular Foundation Material (if required)
48" Storm Sewer Manhole
48" Storm Sewer M.H. constructed over existing pipe
60" Storm Sewer M.H. constructed over existing pipe
72" Catch Basin M.H. with sump
Concrete curb and gutter
Class 5 Gravel - 100% crushed quarry rock
Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 31
Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 41
Topsoil Borrow (if required)
Sod
Remove Sediment at Lake Outlet
F.F. JEDLICKI, INC.
KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL
500.0 LF 8.00 $ 4,000.00 10.00 $ 5,000.00
4.0 EA 450.00 $ 1,800.00 1,000.00 $ 4,000.00
670.0 SY 7.00 $ 4,690.00 5.00 $ 3,350.00
130.0 LF 5.00 $ 650.00 5.00 $ 650.00
82.0 LF 37.00 $ 3,034.00 30.00 $ 2,460.00
373.0 LF 39.00 $ 14,547.00 33.00 $ 12,309.00
283.0 LF 42.00 $ 11,886.00 36.00 $ 10,188.00
495.0 LF 76.00 $ 37,620.00 80.00 $ 39,600.00
1.0 EA 2,110.00 $ 2,110.00 3,850.00 $ 3,850.00
150.0 TN 15.00 $ 2,250.00 25.00 $ 3,750.00
2.0 EA 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00 3,000.00 $ 6,000.00
4.0 EA 2,500.00 $ I0,000.00 4,500.00 $ 18,000.00
1.0 EA 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00
1.0 EA 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 9,500.00 $ 9,500.00
130.0 LF 35.00 $ 4,550.00 30.00 $ 3,900.00
300.0 TN 24.00 $ 7,200.00 25.00 $ 7,500.00
73.0 TN 120.00 $ 8,760.00 100.00 $ 7,300.00
60.0 TN 150.00 $ 9,000.00 100.00 $ 6,000.00
80.0 CY 15.00 $ 1,200.00 25.00 $ 2,000.00
2,600.0 SY 4.50 $ 11,700.00 5.00 $ 13,000.00
30.0 CY 39.00 $ 1,170.00 20.00 $ 600.00
Total Section 1
$ 147,767.00 $ 164,957.00
SECTION 2 - EMERALD DRIVE/GLENDALE ROAD
1 Remove Bituminous Surface
2 Remove Concrete Curbs
3 Remove Concrete Apron
4 Tree Removal - 4" and larger
5 12" RCP - Class IV
6 15" RCP - Class IV
7 24" RCP Arch Pipe - Class III
8 24" Arch Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
9 Granular Foundation Material (if required)
10 48" Storm Sewer Manhole with sump
11 48" Catch Basin Manhole
12 2' x 3' Catch Basin
13 Class 5 Gravel - 100% crushed quarry rock
14 Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 31
15 Bituminous Base Mn/DOT 2331 Type 41
16 Concrete Curb and Gutter
17 Concrete Driveway Apron
18 Topsoil Borrow
19 Sod
300.0 SY 9.00 $ 2,700.00 5.00 $ 1,500.00
70.0 LF 5.00 $ 350.00 5.00 $ 350.00
60.0 SF 5.00 $ 300.00 20.00 $ 1,200.00
1.0 EA 500.00 $ 500.00 500.00 $ 500.00
25.0 LF 39.00 $ 975.00 26.00 $ 650.00
247.0 LF 41.00 $ 10,127.00 30.00 $ 7,410.00
300.0 LF 57.00 $ 17,100.00 55.00 $ 16,500.00
1.0 EA 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
100.0 TN 15.00 $ 1,500.00 25.00 $ 2,500.00
1.0 EA 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00 4,250.00 $ 4,250.00
2.0 EA 1,800.00 $ 3,600.00 6,000.00 $ 12,000.00
2.0 EA 1,600.00 $ 3,200.00 4,200.00 $ 8,400.00
115.0 TN 24.00 $ 2,760.00 25.00 $ 2,875.00
30.0 TN 150.00 $ 4,500.00 100.00 $ 3,000.00
27.0 TN 150.00 $ 4,050.00 100.00 $ 2,700.00
70.0 LF 25.00 $ 1,750.00 30.00 $ 2,100.00
60.0 SF 10.00 $ 600.00 30.00 $ 1,800.00
50.0 CY 15.00 $ 750.00 25.00 $ 1,250.00
750.0 SY 4.50 $ 3,375.00 5.00 $ 3,750.00
Total Section 2
$ 62,737.00 $ 75,235.00
-3649-
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
BID TAB
07/17/02
CITY OF MOUND
2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
MFRA #13677
F.F. JEDLICKI, INC.
] QUANTITY [ ~IT [ UHIT PRICE [ TOTAL
Clearing and Grubbing
Remove existing 24" RCP and Apron
3 Remove Bituminous Surface
4 Remove Concrete Curb
24" RC? - Class III
27" RCP - Class III
27" Concrete Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
Granular Foundation Material (if required)
48" Storm Sewer Manhole
10 Extra Depth Manhole
11 Bituminous Patch
12 Concrete Curb and Gutter
13 Import and Place Fill
14 Topsoil Borrow
15 Seed and Mulch
16 Wood Fiber Blanket
17 Erosion Control Fence
KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION
UNIT PRICE1 TOTAL
1.0 LS 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 6,950.00 $ 6,950.00
1.0 LS 600.00 $ 600.00 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
65.0 SY 12.00 $ 780.00 5.00 $ 325.00
20.0 LF 11.00 $ 220.00 5.00 $ 100.00
78.0 LF 46.00 $ 3,588.00 36.00 $ 2,808.00
186.0 LF 56.00 $ 10,416.00 45.00 $ 8,370.00
1.0 EA 1,900.00 $ 1,900.00 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00
50.0 TN 15.00 $ 750.00 25.00 $ 1,250.00
1.0 EA 2,250.00 $ 2,250.00 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
4.7 LF 150.00 $ 705.00 100.00 $ 470.00
65.0 SY 39.00 $ 2,535.00 100.00 $ 6,500.00
20.0 LF 40.00 $ 800.00 100.00 $ 2,000.00
250.0 CY 19.00 $ 4,750.00 15.00 $ 3,750.00
50.0 CY 19.00 $ 950.00 25.00 $ 1,250.00
1.0 LS 2,800.00 $ 2,800.00 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
250.0 SY 2.00 $ 500.00 5.00 $ 1,250.00
35.0 LF 5.00 $ 175.00 10.00 $ 350.00
Total Section 3
$ 37,219.00
$ 46,373.00
SECTION 4 - BARTLETT BOULEVARD
Remove Bituminous Surface
Remove Concrete Curb
12" R.C.P. Class 5
2' x 3' Catch Basin
Connect to existing structure
Bituminous Patch
Concrete Curb and Gutter
Topsoil Borrow
Sod
85.0 SY 27.00 $ 2,295.00 5.00 $ 425.00
60.0 LF 12.00 $ 720.00 5.00 $ 300.00
87.0 LF 74.00 $ 6,438.00 50.00 $ 4,350.00
3.0 EA 1,850.00 $ 5,550.00 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00
1.0 LS 650.00 $ 650.00 850.00 $ 850.00
85.0 SY 75.00 $ 6,375.00 60.00 $ 5,100.00
60.0 LF 37.00 $ 2,220.00 40.00 $ 2,400.00
16.0 CY 19.00 $ 304.00 25.00 $ 400.00
130.0 SY 5.90 $ 767.00 5.00 $ 650.00
Total Section 4
$ 25,319.00
$ 18,975.00
Clear and Grub 1.0 LS 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00
Site Grading Construction 1.0 LS 4,800.00 $ 4,800.00 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00
Skimmer Structure with Intake Pipe 1.0 EA 4,750.00 $ 4,750.00 2,170.00 $ 2,170.00
Riprap (Existing 18" RCP) 4.0 CY 150.00 $ 600.00 60.00 $ 240.00
Seed and Mulch 1.0 LS 950.00 $ 950.00 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00
Total Section 5
13,600.00
$ 17,910.00
Common Excavation
24" CMP Aprons with Riprap
Riprap (Existing 24" RCP)
Seed and Mulch
Total Section 6
SECTION 7 - DAKOTA RAIL
1 Clear and Grub
2 21" RCP - Class IV
3 21" RCP Class IV - Jacked
4 21" Concrete Flared End with Trash Guard and Riprap
5 Seed and Mulch
Total Section 7
Total
1.0 LS 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00
2.0 EA 950.00 $ 1,900.00 500.00 $ 1,000.00
4.0 CY 125.00 $ 500.00 60.00 $ 240.00
1.0 LS 1,900.00 $ 1,900.00 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00
$ 16,800.00
1.0 LS 1,900.00 $ 1,900.00
28.0 LF 39.00 $ 1,092.00
40.0 LF 350.00 $ 14,000.00
2.0 EA 1,400.00 $ 2,800.00
1.0 LS 1,100.00 $ 1,100.00
$ 20,892.00
$ 324,334.00
$ 28,740.00
4,500.00 $ 4,500.00
40.00 $ 1,120.00
600.00 $ 24,000.00
2,850.00 $ 5,700.00
2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
$ 37,320.00
$ 389,510.00
-3650-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 19, 2002
TO:
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
FROM:
John Cameron, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
New Municipal Well
MFRA #13313
As you are aware, we are working with Emmons & Olivier Resource, the firm engaged by the City
to develop plans for a new municipal well to replace Well No. 1 and Well No. 6. Staff's number one
choice for a site has been adjacent to the existing elevated storage tank located in Sarbo Park on
Evergreen Road. Along with the new well, a new pump house will also be required. It has been our
intention along with that of Public Works to construct a larger building that could also house the
equipment for a number of cellular communication companies. There is already one company on the
water tower with a temporary enclosure that houses their equipment.
The property presently owned by the City would not be large enough to accommodate the existing
park with a baseball field and also the new well and pump house. There are two options available for
acquiring additional land. Originally we had intended to approach the School District about
purchasing the necessary property and locate the well and pump house just south of the water tower.
This property is heavily wooded and would need some fairly extensive grading. In addition, the only
location for an access road would be on the east side of the water tower through the outfield of the
baseball diamond.
-3651 -
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
July 19, 2002
Page 2
The other option would be to acquire the vacant residential lot adjacent to the west side of the water
tower. This site is more preferable, since it is open except on the very south and would require very
little site preparation. The lot fronts on Evergreen Road, so access would not be an issue. This site
would also leave the present Sarbo Park undisturbed. Greg Skinner and I along with Stewart Grubb
ofEmmons & Olivier recently met with the Minnesota Health Department (MHD) and looked at
both sites. The MHD has some very specific requirements that must be met, with the most notable
being a 50-foot separation between the new well and adjacent property. The MHD representative
said that either site appeared to meet their standards. The preliminary studies done by Emmons &
Olivier have indicated that this area should provide the geology and aquifer necessary for a new
well.
After reviewing our two options, Greg and I are recommending the residential lot as our choice for
the new well and pump house. The first step in acquiring this property would be to have an appraisal
done, so negotiations could commence with the property owner. We are estimating that an appraisal
would cost approximately $2,000 and would like to work with Bob Lindall of Kennedy and Graven
to proceed with the appraisal. I will provide additional information, such as maps of the area, for
Council review at their meeting on July 23, 2002.
s:\main:hMou 13313 :\Correspondence\hanson7-18
-3652-
Iq A
RTERED
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis MN 55402
(612) 337-9300 telephone
(612) 337-9310 fax
http://www, kennedy-graven.corn
July 17, 2002
Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
534! MaywoodRoad
Mound, MN 55364-1627
ROBERT J. LINDALL
Attorney at Law
Direct Dial (612) 337 -9219
*CmXified Real Property Law Specialist
VIA FACSIMILE
952-472-0620
AND U.S. MAIL
Re: City Purchase of Lots 23-28, Koehlers Addition ("Balboa Property")
Dear Kandis:
As you will recall, the City entered into an option agreement between itself and Balboa Center Limited
Partnership dated May 28, 2002. Under the agreement, the City paid an option price of $1,000 in return
for an option to purchase the above property for $185,000, provided closing occurs prior to July 30,
2002.
The purposes of the purchase of the property were to provide a site for: (a) construction by Metropolitan
Council of a lift station; (b) construction by the City of a grit chamber or holding ponds; and (c) sale to
Xcel Energy for potential expansion of its substation to mitigate for the loss by Xcel of an expansion site
immediately west of its substation due to realignment of County Road 15.
Pursuant to the option agreement, the City has retained STS Consultants to complete various
environmental investigation activities on the property. That investigation has not been completed as of
the date of this letter.
The option to purchase the Balboa propeWy will be lost if not exercised or extended prior to July 30,
2002. The option can be extended until September 30, 2002, upon payment of further consideration in
the amount of $8,500.
We believe the City has the following options:
Option 1 would be to extend the option. The advantages of extending the option are:
· The opportunitY to purchase the property will not be lost;
· The $8,500 additional option consideration will apply towards the purchase price if the property is
ultimately purchased;
RJL-2 17703v 1
MU200-92
-3653-
Kandis Hanson Ltr
July 17, 2002
Page 2
· The additional time will enable the City to further investigate whether to purchase the Balboa
property and to negotiate solution of environmental conditions.
· The additional time will enable the City to process the tax split and zonh~g letter required to be
completed by closing.
The disadvantages of option 1 are as follows:
· The $8,500 additional option consideration will be lost if the City does not ultimately acquire the
Balboa property.
Option 2 is to purchase the property prior to expiration of the present option tenn. The advantages of
this option are as follows:
· Obtain possession earlier so as to begin earlier use of the property or conveyance of it to others.
Assure purchase of the property without risk of inadvertent failure to properly execute the option at a
later date.
The disadvantages of option 2 are as follows:
· Lose opportunity to complete the environmental investigation of the property prior to purchase.
· Difficulty in completing necessary pre-closing steps prior to closing.
Based on the foregoing, I recommend that the City Council authorize extension of the option and other
steps necessary by the City manager, mayor and City attorney to extend the option in accordance with
the option agreement.
If the decision is to exercise the option, please advise me on July 24, 2002, so that on or before July 25,
2002, we may give the required notice to close.
If the decision is to extend the option, please messenger me notice of the decision and a bank cashier's
check for $8,500 payable to Balboa Center Limited Parmership on July 24, 2002, so that I may forward
the check and extend the option prior to its expiration.
Please let me know whether you have any questions about this matter or whether you wish to have me
attend the City Council meeting on July 23, 2002.
Robert J. Lindall
RJL:peb
cc: John Cameron
John Dean
RJL-217703vl
MU200~92
-3654-
Page 1 of 1
Bonnie Ritter
From:
To:
Sent:
Attach:
Subject:
"Dean, John B." <jdean@Kennedy-Graven.com>
<bonnieritter@cityofmound.com>
Thursday, July 18, 2002 3:39 PM
1L@CW03! 1 .DOC
1L@CW03! 1 .DOC
Bonnie: Attached is the most recent draft of the preliminary agreement with Brenshall Homes/Landform. This is
the form that should be included in the packets. However, please note on the front of the agreement, or
somewhere else in the packets that the Brenshall/Landform is still reviewing the provisions of Section 12 (D)
relating to the use of the deposit. We are hopeful that the wording of that section will have been worked out
before the meetings.
- 3655- 7/18/2002
AGREEMENT
DRAFT
7/18/02
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this __ day of ,2002, by
and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota, a
Minnesota public body corporate and politic ("HRA"), the City of Mound, a municipal corporation
("City") and Mound Harbor Renaissance, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company
("Developer").
RECITALS:
First: The HRA did on or about March 26, 2002 authorize the solicitation of proposals for the
redevelopment of portions of downtown Mound (the "Project Area").
Second: Proposals were received on May 9, 2002 from parties interested in developing all or part of
the Project Area.
Third: Interviews of proposers were conducted by the Board of the HRA on June 4 and 6.
Fourth: The I-IRA, by resolution dated June 11, 2002 has selected the Developer for the
redevelopment of that certain area located in Mound, Minnesota, which area is generally shown on
the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter the "Redevelopment Area");
Fifth: Developer is proposing redevelopment within the Redevelopment Area which may include,
without limitation, office, residential and commercial/retail uses generally consistent with the
submittal made by Developer in response to the solicitation of proposals, incorporated herein by
reference, and attached as Exhibit B (hereinafter the "Redevelopment");
Sixth: The HRA and City wish to cooperate with Developer's initial efforts in analyzing the
potential and feasibility of Redevelopment and is willing to proceed as described in this
Agreement;
Seventh: The parties acknowledge that Developer will expend substantial time and effort, and incur
substantial expense in analyzing the feasibility of the Redevelopment;
Eighth: Developer is willing to undertake the above described activities with the reasonable
assurance from the HRA and City that they will support and cooperate with Developer in its
Redevelopment efforts.
Ninth: The HRA, City and Developer have executed this Agreement to document their
understanding with respect to the proposed Redevelopment.
JBD-190433v2
MU195-2
1
-3656-
AGREEMENT
NOW, TItEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual obligations of the
parties contained herein, each of them does hereby represent, covenant and agree with the other as
follows:
1. Exhibits. Exhibit A (Redevelopment Area), Exhibit A-1 (Site Plan), and Exhibit B
(Submittal Proposal).
2. Rules of Interpretation.
Ao
This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with and governed by the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
Any titles of the several parts, articles and sections of this Agreement are inserted for
convenience and reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or
interpreting any of its provisions.
3. Statement of Intent.
It is the intention of the parties that Developer will proceed with the development activities
necessary to permit Redevelopment, in a manner, and on terms and conditions, which are
mutually acceptable to Developer and the HRA. The parties acknowledge that in order for
Redevelopment to be constructed, Developer may at some point need financial and/or site
assembly assistance from the HRA. This Agreement does not, however, constitute either
approval of such financial or site assembly assistance, nor does it obligate the HRA to
provide such assistance, but the HRA shall cooperate with such efforts to obtain and will
reasonably consider requests for financial and/or site assembly assistance.
4. Representations by HRA and City.
The HRA and City each represent and warrant that:
Ao
The HRA and City are public bodies with all the powers of a housing and
redevelopment authority and city, respectively, duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Minnesota. The HRA and City have the power to enter
into this Agreement and carry out their respective obligations hereunder and each
has duly authorized the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by
action of its respective governing body.
Bo
There are no pending or threatened legal proceedings of which the HRA or City is
aware which, if successful, would threaten the economic viability of the City or
the validity or enforceability of this Agreement or which would restrain or enjoin
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
JBD- 190433v2
MU195-2
2
-3657-
5. Survival of Representations.
All of the foregoing representations and warranties shall survive the termination of this
Agreement.
6. Undertaking By Developer.
During the term of this Agreement, Developer intends to undertake and pursue certain
activities with respect to the Redevelopment. Developer's activities will include the
following: development of plans for the Redevelopment that are substantially consistent
with the Mound Visions guidelines, determination of costs of Redevelopment, including site
assembly and preparation of the land for construction, analysis of necessary government
approvals that will be required, the likelihood and timing of the same, review of sources of
financing, analysis of the feasibility of the Redevelopment, and such other activities as
would be customary and necessary to determine whether to proceed with the
Redevelopment.
7. HRA's and City's Undertaking and Agreement.
The HRA and City agree to cooperate with Developer in Developer's undertakings, and
specifically agree that during the term of this Agreement the HRA and City will not (i)
provide or enter into an agreement for provision of financial assistance to any third party in
connection with any proposed development within the Redevelopment Area, or (ii) except
as may be necessary in connection with the provision of public improvements not related to
new development or redevelopment by a third party within the Redevelopment Area,
condemn or agree to proceed with the condemnation of any property within the
Redevelopment Area to assist or facilitate development within such area by any third party.
The HRA and City acknowledge that Developer has, during the term of this Agreement, the
exclusive right to deal with the HRA and City on matters relating to the redevelopment of
the Redevelopment Area as further provided in Section 9 of this Agreement, and the HRA
and City will do nothing which is inconsistent with that right. The HRA and City agree to
promptly process all applications relating to the Redevelopment of any nature whatsoever.
The HRA and City shall take reasonable steps consistent with their respective statutory
authority and legislative discretion, where applicable, to initiate and complete or cause to
have completed on a timely basis all necessary and appropriate governmental actions
needed to redevelop the Redevelopment Area, including, but not limited to, those actions
set forth in Section 12(B) of this Agreement, and to hold special meetings, if necessary,
to accommodate timing needs of the Developer with respect to the Redevelopment.
8. Phased Development.
The Developer, the HRA and the City acknowledge that the Redevelopment Area may be
redeveloped in non-contiguous phases over a number of years. The redevelopment of the
Redevelopment Area, including the scope, nature and location of phased redevelopment,
will be subject to such priorities as the Developer, in its reasonable judgment, deems
consistent with the master plan and market conditions, taking into consideration the
JBD-190433v2
MU195-2
-3658-
following variables: timing; geographic areas within the Redevelopment Area; the scope
of necessary improvements; and the type of development to take place (for example,
residential or commercial).
As a result of the phased redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area, the HRA anticipates
that it will enter into a redevelopment agreement for the Redevelopment Area with the
Developer which may provide for separate redevelopment agreements with the Developer
for certain phases of redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area. The terms and
conditions of such redevelopment contracts shall be subject to the provisions of this
Agreement and the mutual agreement of the Developer and the HRA.
Development Agreements.
Redevelopment Contract(s) Criteria. The HRA, the City, and the Developer have entered
into this Agreement with the understanding that the HRA and Developer anticipate
executing a contract for private redevelopment for the Redevelopment Area. The HRA
and City agree that as an inducement to the Developer to enter into this Agreement and as
part of the consideration for the expenses provided by Developer to the HRA pursuant to
this Agreement, the HRA and City agree that during the term of this Agreement,
Developer shall have the exclusive right to enter into a redevelopment agreement with the
HRA for the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area. During the term of this
Agreement the HRA and City shall not negotiate with any other party for the
redevelopment of all or any portion of the Redevelopment Area. If the Developer and the
HRA determine that they want to enter into separate redevelopment agreements for
certain phases of the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area, then the redevelopment
agreement entered into between the HRA and the Developer, to the extent it excludes a
portion of the Redevelopment Area (the "Excluded Redevelopment Area"), shall include
a provision extending the Developer's exclusive right to enter into redevelopment
agreement(s) with the HRA for the Excluded Redevelopment Area. The redevelopment
agreement(s) will include all of the terms and conditions for the redevelopment of the
Redevelopment Area and it will be necessary for the Developer and the HRA to address,
among others, the following issues:
mo
Type, quantity and quality of the minimum improvements to the Redevelopment
Area.
Bo
Timing of the acquisition by the HRA, the City and Developer of parcels for
various phases of the Redevelopment Area.
Co
Timing of construction of the minimum improvements of the intended phases or
portions of the phases of the Redevelopment Area.
D. Payment by the Developer for the Redevelopment Area.
E. Use and duration of minimum assessment agreements.
JBD-190433v2
MU 195 -2
4
-3659-
10.
Fo
Ko
Mo
Timing and payment for public improvements including the use of special
assessments.
Responsibility for the application of grants particularly from the State and the
Metropolitan Council.
Responsibility, cost and timing of soil correction.
Responsibility, cost and timing of pollution abatement.
Developer's use of third parties to either redevelop portions of the Redevelopment
Area or construct part of the minimum improvements.
Issuance of tax increment or tax abatement bonds for the acquisition,
environmental remediation and the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Area.
Permits and approvals including but not limited to:
2.
3.
4.
5.
o
7.
8.
9.
10.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Minnesota Department of Health
City zoning, planning, vacations, plat approvals, permits for demolition,
utility and building, development program modifications, tax increment
district approvals among others
Watershed District
Metropolitan Council
Hennepin County
Railroad Abandonment
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Methods to assure that the office/commercial-retail elements of the development will
be constructed.
Term.
This Agreement shall expire on February 1, 2003, provided that, Developer may terminate
this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the HRA and City, in the event that
Developer determines, in good faith, that the Redevelopment is not feasible, or the I-IRA or
City is not taking actions consistent with facilitating the Redevelopment. The parties each
waive any claim or cause of action that they may have against the other party based upon the
termination of this Agreement. The parties may, by mutual written agreement extend this
Agreement for such further periods as they shall determine to be appropriate from time to
time.
JBD-191M33v2
MU195-2
5
-3660-
Any such notice shall be deemed delivered if either actually delivered, or if faxed and
mailed to the parties at the following addresses:
Developer
Mound Harbor Renaissance, LLC
4804 Carrick Road
Mound, MN 55364
Attn: Thomas Stokes
With a copy to:
Gregory W. Munson
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.
4000 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Attn: Executive Director
City
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Attn: City Manager
With a copy to:
John B. Dean
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
11. Consideration for Exclusivity.
The Developer's payment of HRA costs as provided in Section 12(D) hereof, is the
consideration for the City negotiating exclusively with the Developer for the redevelopment
of the Redevelopment Area as provided in this Agreement.
12. Miscellaneous.
Ao
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relative to the
study and analysis of the proposed Redevelopment. Unless specifically described
herein, no obligation shall be inferred or construed.
Bo
As expansion of the foregoing, Developer understands that further and separate
action is required with respect to the Redevelopment. HRA and City agree to take
reasonable steps consistent with such actions necessary to facilitate the
Redevelopment. Those actions may include, without limitation:
JBD-190433v2
MU 195-2
6
-3661 -
Do
establishment or modification of Project Area and Tax Increment District, or
utilization of tax abatement;
b) zoning and subdivision approvals;
c)
acquisition of land within the Redevelopment Area by either voluntary
purchase or condemnation (or both); and
d) construction of public improvements to serve the Redevelopment.
approval of separate contracts calling for the actual redevelopment of the
Redevelopment Area.
Developer understands that many of the actions which the HRA or City may be
called upon to take require the reasonable discretion and in some instances the
legislative judgment of the HRA or City, such actions may be made only following
established procedures; and HRA and City may not, by agreement, agree in advance
to any specific decision in such matters.
Contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Agreement Developer
has delivered a deposit to the HRA in the mount of $ 30,000 (the "Deposit"). The
deposit shall be used to reimburse the HRA for its costs and expenses incurred in
carrying out its obligations hereunder and in the negotiation of a development
contract with Developer. At any time the unexpended amount of the Deposit is
reduced to $10,000, the Developer will, within 15 days following written notice of
such fact from the HRA, provide funds necessary to remm the Deposit to $30,000,
or such lesser amount as the HRA may, in its judgment, deem sufficient to cover the
anticipated reimbursable costs yet to be performed under this Agreement. The
Deposit may be used only to pay: i) City/HRA Attorney fees, and consulting
engineer fees; ii) fees of other consultants retained by the HRA or the City to
provide services in connection with the implementation of this Agreement which are
specifically authorized by the City Manager. No charge for HRA or City stafftime
will be made against the Deposit. Any unexpended portion of the Deposit shall be
returned to Developer upon the expiration of this Agreement.
JBD-190433v2
MU 195 -2
7
-3662-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective the date
and year first above written.
MOUND HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By:
Its
By:
Its
CITY OF MOUND
By:
Its
By:
Its
MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE, LLC
By.
Its Chief Manager
#2672816B
JBD-190433v2
MU195-2
8
-3663-
EXIIIBIT A
Redevelopment Area Legal Description
-3664-
EXHIBIT A-1
Site Plan
-3665-
EXHIBIT B
Submitted Proposal
-3666-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
TO:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
BONNIE RITTER
SUBJECT: PUBLIC GATHERING PERMITS- FISHERS OF MEN
DATE:
JULY 17, 2002
On June 25, 2002, the Council approved two public gathering permits (August 3
and August 17 at Mound Bay Park) for the Fishers of Men Fishing Tournament,
and did not waive the $300/day fee as requested by the applicants, Mark and
Nacole Schutz.
The Schutzs have requested to be put on the agenda for July 23, so that they
can address the Council regarding the required fee.
printed on recycled paper
-3667-
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND~ MINNF_.SOTA 55364
PUBLIC GATHE~G PERMIT
Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use-is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the
abiIity of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF TIlE CITY PARKS OR
BUILDINGS.
Group is to remove all litter and trash and Provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park
Date of Use 515107__
Area to be Used XC~V"~d
Intend~ Use ~~-~,~
Exp~t~ Attend~ce ~
Represen~five's Name
Address ~~ ~~~[C
· ,l,phon
Drivers License Number
-3668-
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC GATI:[ERING PERMIT.
Use of a punic park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use 'is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the
ability of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS
BUILDINGS. -
Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park
PERMIT FEE: *300/DAY~X~, (-~ OD ~(")~"~~
Date of Use ¢1 l'~r
Intended Use ~x~ --
Expected Attendance-[~(~)-~"')
Drivers License Number J )
-3669-
-3670-° ~
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
To: Mayor, City Council and City Manager
From: Deb Grand, Julie Luedke and Joel Knmam
Liquor Store Management Team
Re: Renaming of the Liquor Store
Metro Plains has indicated to us they will be ordering the lettering for our
new sign by the end of July. After several suggestions and discussions we
have decided on the following two choices. We are submitting them to you
for your approval.
First choice: ~By t~e C~ay g42ines anaC Spirits
Second Choice: 7far6or g42ines anaCSpirits
Thank you for your consideration in this project.
07-17-2002 09:04AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4920620 P.O1
4071 Sunset Drive Box 385
Sprin~l Pa~, MN ~;{;384-o3a~
Phone- 952.-471-7125
Fax- 952-471-9151
E-mail- I~uswest.~
If you do not receive all of the pages, please contact our office as soon as possibJe at 952-47~-7125
-3672-
07-17-2002 09:04RM FROM LAKE MINNETONKR COMMUNICR TO 4920620 P,02
le
I
-3673-
07-17-2002 09:04AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4?20620 P.03
-3674- TOTAL P.03
ie
N
-3676-
.-3677-
-3678-
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Kandis Hanson
Acting Chief John McKinley
Monthly Report for June, 2002
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
STATISTICS
The
of June.
vehicle
abuse, 4 forgery/NSF, 6
liquor law 9
during the month
offenses include 7
aggravated assault, 3
include 3 child
to property, 1 narcotics, 10
assault~, 14 dome~des (6 with
Warnings were
warrant
The
There
assisted
on9
ig, adults and 7
adult
3 with injuries.
Mound
assistance
-3679-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - June, 2002
ii. rNVEST~O^T~ONS
Due to the resignation of Investigator Nelson on June 1, Investigator
Swanson conducted all assigned investigations during the month.
Investigator Swanson worked on 2 fleeing the police in a motor vehicle
cases, 1 robbery, 2 criminal sexual conducts, 3 burglary cases and 2 stolen
vehicle investigations in June accounting for over 46.5 hours of
investigative time. Other cases Investigator Swanson worked included
assaults, thefts, tampering with a witness, domestic assaults, tampering
with a motor vehicle, theft by trickery, NSF checks, forgery and absenting.
III.
IV.
Formal complaints were issued for disorderly conduct, felony obstructing
with force, felony 4t~ degree assault, fleeing police in a motor vehicle,
possession of stolen property, motor vehicle theft, theft by trick, domestic
assault, interfering with a 911 call, worthless checks, consumption of
alcohol by a minor, misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor DUI, driving
after revocation, and hit and mn.
PERSONNEL/STAFFING
The month of June was a moth of transition for the police department.
There were a total of three officers who resigned or retired during the
month. The department used approximately 105 hours of overtime during
the month of June. Officers used 24 hom~ of comp-time, 54 hours of sick
time, and 179.5 hours of vacation. Officers earned 46.5 hours of comp
time.
TRAINING
Officers attended a department defensive tactics training in the month of
June. One officer attended crime alert training and a member of the
administrative support team attended a day and a half of training.
CO .MMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
One of our reserve officers, Jen Williams, was appointed to fill in as
Community Service Officer for the summer. Part of her first month was
filled with getting to know her job. Jen responded to 5 animal complaints,
26 ordinance violations and responded to192 miscellaneous contacts.
-3680-
The reserves donated i37.75 hours to thc communi~ in June. The unit.
currently has seven members who contribute on a regular basis.
-3681 -
MOUND POLICE DEP2~Z~TMENT
JUNE 2002
Homicide 0 0 0 0
Criminal Sexual Conduct i 0 0 0
Robbery i 0 0 0
Aggravated Assault i 0 1 0
Burglary 7 0 0
Larceny 16 0 i 1
Vehicle Theft 3 0 0 1
Arson 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 1
1 0
0 0
29 0 2 3 i
child Abuse/Neglect 3 0 0 1 1
Forgery/NSF Checks 4 0 i 1 1
Criminal Damage to Property 6 0 0 1 2
Weapons 2 0 2 0 0
Narcotic Laws i 0 0 1 1
Liquor Laws 10 0 0 10 10
DWI 9 0 0 9 9
Simple Assault 4 0 1 2 2
Domestic Assault 6 0 0 6 4
Domestic (No Assault) 9 0 0 0 0
Harassment 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Status Offenses 3 0 0 2 0
Public Peace 4 0 0 4 2
Trespassing 0 0 0 0 0
All Other Offenses 6 0 0 6 7
TOTAL
67 0 4 43
39 ?
PART II & PART IV
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Medicals
Animal Complaints
Mutual Aid
Other General Investigations
13
3
0
33
19
13
285
366
HCCP
Inspections
1
13
476
45
4O
-3682-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
~UNE 2002
DWI
More Than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired or No Plates
Stop Arm Violations
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Code Enforcement
Seat Belt
Overweight Vehicles
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
9
9
0
10
0
47
1
0
14
0
4
0
0
0
2
0
1
16
1
1
4
2
0
124
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
-3683-
Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
WARPJ%NT ;LRRESTS
Felony
Misdemeanor
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
JUNE Z002
8
5
0
0
2
11
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
29 0
0 0
1 0
-3684-
MOUND POLICE DEPAR~
CRIME ACTMTY REPORT JUNE 2002
ACTIVITY
Hazardous Citations
Non-Hazardous Citations
Hazardous Warnings
Non-Hazardous Warnings
Verbal Warnings
Parking Citations
DWI
Over .10
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Adult Felony Arrests
Adult M£sdemeanor Arrests
Juvenile Felony Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
Part I Offenses
Part II Offenses
Medicals
Animal Complaints
Ordinance Violations
Other Public Contacts
THIS YEAR TO
I~ONTH DATE
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
62 348 328
34 179 224
3 16 87
23 110 290
52 481 424
16 153 335
9 30 39
9 23 38
13 69 57
3 26 9
0 0 0
1 19 13
40 152 193
2 9 9
7 71 115
29 149 208
67 366 415
33 146 157
19 198 300
13 118 195
285 2,336 3,422
TOTAL
Assists
Follow-Ups
HCCP
Mutual Aid Given
Mutal Aid Requested
720 4,999 6,858
32 227
16 86
1 15
13 79
9 27
241
373
22
74
36
-3685-
Mound Police
Incident. Date_Reported Between 05/26/02 06/2S/0!
CaseProperty. RecordType Equal STOLEN
Property Value Report
Class
Class Extension
A- Motor Vehicles
Unknown
· TOTAL: A- Motor Vehicles
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
RecordT~oe Items Doflar Value
Stolen
1 6,995.00
1 6,995.00
B - Bicycles
Unknown
TOTAL: B - Bicycles
Clothing and Furs
Unknown
TOTAL: Clothing and Furs
Stolen
Stolen
6 2,738.00
6 2,738.00
I 50.00
1 50.00
E - Consumer Items
Beer
BeeK AND CIGARETTES
CONDOMS
TOTAL: E = Consumer Items
Stolen 1 15.00
Stolen 1 35.00
Stolen 1 5.00
3 55.00
)- Appliances
Ak Conditioner
TOTAL: H - Appliances
Stolen
1 500.00
1 500.00
J - Jewelry & precious Metals
Ring
TOTAL: $ - Jewelry & precious Metals
Stolen
1 500.00
1 500.00
0 - Office Equipment
LaptOp Computer
TOTAL: 0 - Office Equipment
Stolen
1 400.00
1 400.00
P - Personal Accessories
Unknown
SUNGLASSES
TOTAL: P - Personal Accessories
Stolen 1 25.00
Stolen 1 50.00
2 75.00
R - RMio/TWSound Enterlainment
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 1
-3686-
Property Value Report
Property Class
Class Extension
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 05/26/02 06/25/02
CnseProper~.RecordType Equal STOLEN
Unknown
CD Audio
CD Player
DVD PLAYER
TOTAL: P,. - Radio/TV/Sound Entertainment
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
Record Type Items Dollar Value
Stolen 1 2,350.00
Stolen 1 500.00
Stolen 1 250.00
Stolen I 200.00
4 3,300.00
S - Sports Equipment
Golf Clubs
RACING GIEVES
TOTAL: S - Sports Equipment
T - Currency, Negotiable bonds
Unknown
Boat Fishin8
~ CERTIFICATE
TOTAL: T - Currency, Negotiable bonds
W - Auto Parts & F-4uip
LICENSE PLATE
TOTAL: W - Auto Parts & Equip
Y- AIl Other
Unknown
Air CAPS
GaS CAN
TOTAL: Y - AH Other
Stolen 2 4,330.00
Stolen 1 80.00
3 4,410.00
Stolen 4 1,485.00
Stolen 1 100.00
Stolen 1 25.00
6 1,610.00
Stolen 1 20.00
1 20.00
Stolen I 1.00
Stolen 1 1.00
Stolen 1 15.00
3 17.00
OVF_,R~I.I, TOTAL...
33 20,670.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
PaEe: 2
-3687-
Property Value Report
· Class
Class Extension
Mound Police
Xneldent. Date~eported ]~etween 05f26/02 06/25/02
CascPropcrty. RecordTypc Equal RECOVERED
A- Motor Veh/des
Unknown
-TOTAL: A - Motor Vehicles
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
Record Tyl~e Items Dollar Value
Recovered
1 6,995.00
1 6,995.00
B - Bicycles
Unknown
TOTAL: B - Bicycles
Recovered
1 100.00
1 100.00
E - Consumer Items
CONDOMS
TOTAL: E - Consumer Items
Recovered
1 5.00
1 5.00
R - Radio/TV/Sound Entertainment
Unknown
TOTAL: R - RadiofrWSound Entertainment
Recovered
1 2,350.00
1 2,350.00
S - Sports Equipment
Unknown
TOTAL: S - Sports Equipment
Y - All Other
~r C,~fl~ S
TOTAL: Y - All Other
Recovered
Recovered
1 3,130.00
1 3,130.00
1 1.00
1 1.00
OVERALL TOTAL...
12,581.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 1
-3688-
Crime Summary Report
MOc
Mound Police
Incldent. DateReported Between 0.~26/02 06/25/02
Total
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
MOC Literal T~nslation
9OOO
9O26
92OO
922O
93OO
9301
9312
9313
9314
9430
9450
9451
9561
9566
9567
9568
9710
9720
9730
9731
9732
9741
9750
9800
9801
1
1
10
2
1
2
3
8
3
3
I0
3
1
1
1
3
2
2
26
2
1
10
1
14
9
SPEEDING
OVER THE CENTER. LINE
DAS/DAR/DAC
NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
LOST ARTICLES/OTItER
LOST/MIS SING PERSONS
FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS
FOUND PROPF_~TY
FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOSED
PERSONAL INJURY ACCH3ENTS
PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC.
DOG BITE
~ ENFORCEI~'NT TICKETS
DANGEROUS DOG
A_N]MAL COIVtPLAINTS
MEDICAL/ASU
Iv~.r)ICAL/DOA
Iv~Y)ICALS
MEDXCALS/DX
IVo~ICALS/CI
911 HANG UPS
FIRES
ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIF. D
DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
Licensed to Mound Police D~partmeat
Page: 1
-3689-
Crlme §ummary Report
MOC
Mound Police
IncidenLDateReported Between 05/26/02 06/25/02
Totll
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
MOC Literal Translation
9802
98O4
9~12
9910
9921
9928
9930
9932
9933
9943
9944
9945
9950
9953
9980
999I
9992
9993
9994
A5302
A5352
A5355
A5502
A9502
AL351
2
6
1
I
12
4
4
I
8
1
2
1
3
I
1
I
1
2
7
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
2
PUBLIC ASSIST
NOISE COMPLAINT
TREgPAgg NOTIFICA~ON LT
ALL HCCP CASES
OPEN DOOR/ALARMS
MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS
INSPECTIONS CITATION
HANDGUN CARRY GRANTED
HANDGUN PURCHASE GRANTED
OFP VIO. CRIME CONTKOL & LAW ENF
RESTRAINING ORDER ON FILE
PROWLER
UNWANTED GUEST
SUSPICIOUS PERSON
INFO/INT
CONDITIONAL RELEASE ORDERS
WARRANTS
J-MISC. VIOLATIONS
MUTUAL AID/8100
MUTUAL AID/6500
MUTUAL AID/ALL OTHER
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS FIRM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HAND,~ASLT-AC
ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ *~
TERR THREATS-INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 2
-3690-
Crime Summary Report
MOC
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 05/26/02 06/25/02
Totnl
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
MOC Liternl Trnnsl_n_t_ion
AL352
AL354
AL401
AL501
BlI60
B3334
B3764
B3864
B4390
C31A1
DA540
E2700
I2060
I2100
JATO1
JAF01
JB501
JBF01
JC501
JCF01
L1273
M4140
M5350
N3030
N3070
N3380
N3390
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
7
1
1
3
1
1
1
2
ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC
DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FAM
DOM ASLT-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM-NO WEAPON-AD-FAM
DOM ASLT-MS-THRT BODILY HARM-ADULT FAMILY
BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
FORGERY-MS-MAKE-ALT-DEST-CHK-OV 35000-PER
DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK
ESC-FE-FLEE AN OFFICER
CRIM AGNST FAM-GM-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
CRM AGNST FAM-GM-ENDANGER CHLD-UNK INJURY
TRAF-AC-GM- 1 ST DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
TRAF-AC-GM-1 ST DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
TRAF-ACC-M-3RD DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
TRAF-ACC-M-3RD DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
CSC 1-FEAR GRT BOD HRM-ACQUAINT-13-15-F
LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21
JUVENILE-RUNAWAY ~'
DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE "
MS-VIOL HARASS RESTR_M/qING ORDER
DISTURB PEAC-MS-VIOL DOM ABUSE NO CONTACT ORD
Licensed to Mound Police Departmeat
Page: 3
-3691 -
Crime gummnry Report
MOC
Mound Police
Inciden£DateReported Between 05/21;/02 06/2~/02
Total
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
MOC Literal Translation
GRAND TOTAL:
PIlI0
P3110
Q122O
R2982
T0059
T0061
TB159
TC159
TQ169
TRI59
TR169
U1493
U249C
U249D
U302D
U3289
U349C
U349D
U399D
V0081
V0111
VA021
W3180
XI080
I
5
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
2
1
273
PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTEIVI'
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS-VEI-~CLE-UNK VAL
ROBB-AC~-NO BH-OTH TYP-FEIGN WEAP-ADULT-ACQ
THEFT-UNK LVL YAL-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP
TH~-UNK LVL VAL-FRM MAIL-MO~Y
THEFT-MOi~ 2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
TI~-501-2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
THEFT-251-500-GM-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 250-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER
THEFT-LESS 250-MS-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-501-2500
THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-251-500
THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS
THEFT-MN-ISSUE WORTHLESS CHECK-250 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-35000-OR MORE
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-251-500
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS
FRAUD-MS-OTHER ACT-250 OR LESS
VEH-UNKNOWN-MS-TAMI~ER WITH-ENTER-AUTO
VEH-UNK VALUE-PARTS-MOTOR VEH-AUTO
THEFT-FE-AUTO-MORE THAN 2500
WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-FIREWORKS-NO CHAR
CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-FE-OBST LEGAL PROCESS
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 4
-3692-
Citation Summary Report
MOC
Mound Police
Citation. DateCited Between 05/26/02 06/25/02
Literal Trnn.lntion
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
90OO
9001
9002
46 SPEEDING
4 J-SPEEDING
NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
9OO8
ILLEGAL PASSING
9014
4 STOP SIGN
9015
1 J-STOP SIGN
9016
FAILURE TO YIR!D
9021
J-CARELES S/RECKLES S
9030
CROSSWALK VIOLATION
9O40
2 NO SEATBELT
9100
13 PARKING/ALL OTH~.R
9150
NO TRAILER PARKING
9210
14 PLATES/NO4MPROPER-EXPIRED
GKAND TOTAL...
93
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 1
-3693-
Case Status Report
Total
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 0S/26/02 06/2S/02
OITense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equal AO000
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total
Founded Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
Ref. To GOA Assisted
Oth. A~en /UTL /Advised
Other
__ .--
A5302 A.qLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-NO WEAP'ADLT-ACQ
-- 1 0 0 I 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
A5352 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC
1 0 0 I 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 I00.00 00.00 100.00
A5355 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BODILYHARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
1 0 1 0 0 1
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 I00.00
A9502 TERR THREATS-INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
1 0 1 0 0 1
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
AL351 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM
2 0 0 2 0 2
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
52 ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
AL354 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FAM
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
AL401 DOM ASLT-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM-NO WEAPON-AD-FAM
2 0 0 2 0 2
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
ALS01 DOM ASLT-MS-THRT BODILY HARM-ADULT FAMILY
I 0 0 I 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
BI160 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
1 0 0 0 I 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
B3334 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
B3764 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Departrnem
Page: 1
-3694-
Mound Police
lncident. DateReported Between 05/26/02 06/25/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equ~d AO000
Case Status Report
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total Ref. To
MOC Total Founded Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared Oth. Agen
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
GOA Assisted
/UTL /Advised
1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 .. 100.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
B3864 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-~ WEA.P-COM THEFT
3 0 0 1 2 1
percent 00.00 00.00 33.33 66.67 33.33
B4390 BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
C3 IAI FORGERY-MS- AKE-ALT-DEST-CHK-OV 35000-PER
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
DA540 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARU-UNK
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
E2700 ESC-FE-FLEE AN OFFICER
3 0 0 3 0 3
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
I2060 CRIM AGNST FAM-GM-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
I2100 CRM AGNST FAM-GM-ENDANGER CHLD-UNK INJURY
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
.lAS01 TRAF-AC-GM- I ST DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JAF01 TRAF-AC-GM-I ST DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JBS01 TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JBF01 TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
Other
0
00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
JCS01 TRAF-ACC-M-3RD DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
7 0 0 7 0 7
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 2
-3695-
Mound Police
lncident, DateReported Between 05126/02 06/28/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equnl A0000
Case Status Report
Total
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total
Founded Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared
Wednesday, July 05, 2002
Ref. To GOA Assisted
Oth. A__~_Ag~/UTL /Advised Other
/CF01
7 0 0 7 ..0
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 ' ~ 00.00
L'1273 CSC 1-FEAR GRT BOD HRM-ACQUAINT-13-15-F
1 0 0 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00
TRAF-ACC-M-3RD DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
7
100.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21
0 0 0 0 0
100.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 I00.00 00.00 100.00
M5350 JUVENILE-RL~AWAY
3 0 0 2 1 2
percent 00.00 00.00 66.67 33.33 66.67
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 I00.00
N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 I00.00
~80 MS-VIOL HARASS RESTRAINING ORDER
1 0 0 I 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
N3390 DISTURB PEAC-MS-VIOL DOM ABUSE NO CONTACT ORD
2 0 0 2 0 2
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
P 1110 PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
5 0 0 1 4 1
percent 00.00 00.00 20.00 80.00 20.00
Q1220 STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS-VEHICLE-UNK VAL
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 I00~00
1{2982 ROBB-AGG-NO BH-OTH TYP-FEIGN WEAP-ADULT-ACQ
I 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
T0059 THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP
1 0 0 0 1 0
percem 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 ..-' 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00- '
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 3
-3696-
Mound Police
lncident. DateReported Between 0S/26/02 06/25/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equal A0000
Case Status Report
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total Ref. To
MOC Total Founded Cleared Arrest ln_n_ctive Cleared
Wednesday, J. Uly 03, 2002
GOA Assisted
Oth. Agen /UTL /Advised Other
T0061 THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM MAlL-MONEY
I 0 0 0 1 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
~B159 THEFT-MORE 2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTHPROP
! 0 0 0 I 0 0
TC159 THEFT-501-2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
2 0 0 0 2 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
TQ169 THEFT-251-$ 00-GM-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
1 0 0 0 1 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
TK159 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER
2 0 0 0 2 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
TR169 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
1 0 0 0 1 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
U1493 THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-501-2500
1 0 0 0 1 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
U249C THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-251-500
1 0 0 0 1 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
U249D THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS
1 0 0 0 I 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
U302D THEFT-MN-ISSUE WORTHLESS CHECK-250 OR LESS
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00,00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
3 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
percent 00.00 33.33 33.33 33.33 66.67 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
U3289 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-35000-OR MORE
1 0 0 1 0 I 0
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
U349C THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-251-500
1 0 0 0 1 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00
1 0 0
100.00 00.00 00.00
U349D THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS
1 0 0 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 ,,., 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.0C~ ,~
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 4
-3697-
Mound Police
Incident. Dat~eported Between 0.~26/02 06/25/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equal A0000
Case Status Report
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total
Total Founded
Wednesday, July 03, 2002
Ref. To GOA Assisted
Oth. A e__Ag_~__LUTL /Advised Other
Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared
U399D FRAUD-MS-OTHER ACT-250 OR LESS
1 0 1 0 0 1
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 ' "00.00 I00.00
~0081 VEH-UNKNOWN-MS-TAMPER WITH-ENTER-AUTO
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
V0111 VEH-UNK VALUE-PARTS-MOTOR VEH-AUTO
1 0 0 0 1 0
peroent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
VA021 THEYr-FE-AUTO-MORE THAN 2500
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 I00.00
W3180 WEAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-FIREWORKS-NO CHAR
2 0 2 0 0 2
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
X1080 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-FE-OBST LEGAL PROCESS
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 I00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 O 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
87 0 6 46 35 52
percent 00.00 06.90 52.87 40.23 59.77
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licens~ to Mound Police D~partm~t
Page: 5
-3698-
-3699-
I::l'~'tO '~ 0 0
O,
000000~0
00000000 ~ ~'
00000000 ~
ooooooooo ~ ~
o o o o o o o o ~ ~ <~
ooO p=ooooo
00000
0000
00000000
~000~0~0
-3700-
~00~0
0~0000~0
o o
'°
iO00 0
00000 O0
99999i990
99999i999
99999!999
0~0 0~0
-3701 -
Gommunity Forunt
Hennepin County would like your thoughts on our funding
priorities. The priorities are attached to this meeting
announcement.
For your convenience we have scheduled two sessions:
July 16th at 1:30
Rockford Road Library
6401 42nd Avenue North
Crystal
Or
July 30th at 9:00
Southdale Library
Full Meeting Room
7001 York Avenue South
Edina
Feel free to share this announcement with other people who may
be interested.
-3702-
Human Services HouSing
2002 Funding for Supportive Housing and Related Services
PRIORITIES
The overarching objective for Hennepin County Human Services as it relates to
housing, is to assure safety and stability for children and adults. Stable, safe and
affordable housing contributes significantly to reducing crisis and achieving success in
other program areas for many Human Services clients. Following is a list of priorities
for funding supportive housing and related services:
Funding will focus on supports for permanent housing for:
· Children and adults.who.have been, or are at high risk of becoming, abused or
neglected
· Vulnerable seniors
· Persons with disabilities (including but not limited to mental illness,
developmental disabilities, physical disabilities etc.)
· Persons involved in multiple human services systems who are inappropriately
using crisis and emergency resources
· Adults at high risk of becoming acute or chronic service users
Funding will provide support services for new affordable housing or to help
conserve the client's "housing of choice," including promoting housing retention.
Funding for housing supports should provide elderly and disabled persons a range
and balance of locational and service choices that offer opportunities to live in
community-based, integrated settings.
Funding will provide for the development of housing support models that are
accepted as the most effective, culturally appropriate, and individualized. To that
end, contracts for supportive housing services and related activities are client-
centered and focused on client outcomes.
Hennepin County Human Services recognizes the significance of rental subsidies for
supportive housing projects. Funding for supportive services will focus on projects
with either project-based or tenant-based rental subsidies that are consistent with the
above priorities highlighting target populations, consumer choice, and integration.
Funding from County property tax dollars should be considered a last resort, only
after maximizing all possible sources of federal, state, and private funding. It
should be demonstrated that county dollars are a vehicle to leverage other
public/private funding.
-3703-
DRAFt DKAFr
FUNDING COMMITMENTS
Applications and projects will be reviewed and selected based on criteria consistent with
the above priorities. In addition, applications will be reviewed for consistency with the
City/County Homeless Task l~orce Recommendations, the Hennepin County Housing
and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Strategic Plan, and Hennepin County's
Affordable Housing Incentive Fund criteria.
Hennepin County Human Services strives for a balance of 10cational and service
choices for all supportive housing. Currently, to achieve this balance of choice for
Hennepin County service constituents, models utilizing tenant-based subsidies or small
project-based subsidies will be given a higher priority. For such projects, services
ideally will not be tied to buildings and the client's tenancy will not be tied to accepting
services.
CONTRACT INFORMATION
The type, terms, and conditions of funding provided will vary depending on the needs
of.the clients, the availability of funding resources, and type of activity. Hennepin
County utilizes competitive contracting. Housing program/service providers should
expect to negotiate contract parameters, including client outcome expectations, for any
funding managed by Hennepin County Human Services. If a service provider is unable
to achieve adequate client outcomes, Hennepin County may exercise its option to
contract with another provider.
-3704-
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
June 2002
50.00%
June 2002 YTD
BUDGET EXPENSE ~
GENERAL FUND
Council 79,280 2,126 32,760
City Manager/Clerk 235,100 19,592 116,269
Elections 11,030 0 890
Finance 201,260 14,703 93,624
Assessing 79,700 12 130
Legal 122,000 7,685 44,087
City Property 89,110 5,041 39,727
Computer 28,250 1,079 18,324
Police 1,164,600 81,785 490,504
Emergency Prepardeness 6,780 702 4,293
Planning/Inspections 266,030 29,229 124,835
Streets 576,610 28,405 251,880
Parks 322,240 20,639 156,372
Transfers 207,840 17,320 103,920
Cable TV 48,000 45 155
Contingencies 60,860 948 (89)
VARIANCE
46 520
118 831
10140
107 636
79570
77913
49 383
9926
674 096
2.487
141 195
324 730
165 868
103 920
47 845
60,949
PERCENT
41.32%
49.46%
8.07%
46.52%
0.16%
36.14%
44.58%
64.86%
42.12%
63.32%
46.93%
43.68%
48.53%
50.00%
0.32%
-0.15%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3.498.690
229,311 1.477.681 2.021.009 42.24%
Area Fire
Service Fund 699,470
Cemetery Fund 9,920
Dock Fund 132,700
TIF 1-2 0
Water Fund 577,660
Sewer .Fund 1,007,420
Liquor Fund 460,660
Recycling Fund 155,510
Storm Water Utility 58,200
22,637 301,804 397,666 43.15%
147 1,258 8,662 12.68%
5,968 31,694 101,006 23.88%
83,210 403,826 (403,826)
58,130 386,144 191,516 66.85%
91,669 537,788 469,632 53.38%
27,222 204,115 256,545 44.31%
16,104 55,552 99,958 35.72%
0 33,321 24,879 57.25%
Exp-01
07/18/2002
Gino
-3705- -
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
June 2002
50.00%
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Business Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Other Revenue
Transfers
from Other Funds
Charges to Other
Departments
June 2002 YTD
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE
2,253,520 620,200 620,200
6,300 3,050 6,875
188,450 16,903 132,413
461,130 0 40,400
137,550 7,864 58,441
110,000 10,909 40,628
145,400 6,273 91,025
128,000 0 0
13.000 3,374 8,533
PERCENT
VARIANCE RECEIVED
(1,633,320) 27.52%
575 109.13%
(56,037) 70.26%
(420,730) 8.76%
(79,109) 42.49%
(69,372) 36.93%
(54,375) 62.60%
(128,000) 0.00%
(4,467) 65.64%
TOTAL REVENUE
3,443,350 668,573 998,515 (2.444.835) 29.00%
FIRE FUND 429,470 22,593 251,131 (178,339) 58.47%
CEMETERY FUND 6,050 485 2,685 (3,365) 44.38%
DOCK FUND 129,360 1,694 113,060 (16,300) 87.40%
WATER FUND 535,500 37,212 264,413 (271,087) 49.38%
SEWER FUND 1,048,810 86,133 511,106 (537,704) 48.73%
LIQUOR FUND 2,050,000 190,996 880,123 (1,169,877) 42.93%
RECYCLING FUND 127,880 6,958 50,422 (77,458) 39.43%
STORM WATER UTILITY 112,000 9,124 54,859 (57,141) 48.98%
07118/2002
rev01
Gino
-3706-
General Fund $999,729
CDBG 1,114
Area Fire Protection Services 232,730
Grant Revolving 0
Cemetery (1,163)
Dock 208,955
PW Facility 98,731
G.O. Improvement Bonds
(19,520)
Commerce Place TIF
(20,559)
TIF 1-2 Notes 25,578
G.O. Bonds 200t - A
7,960
G.O. Bonds 2001 - C
19,147
Capital Improvement
1,603,265
MSA 20,520
Sealcoat 3,325
CDB (258)
Downtown TIF 1-2
(1,702,203)
Water 1,259,004
Sewer 1,051,776
Liquor Store 1,394,403
Recycling 73,711
Storm Water 851,520
Fire Relief (43,417)
HRA 18,000
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not .included.
A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the
Independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report
will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties.
In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds
available for spending.
07/18/2002
CashReportCouncil
Gino
-3707-.
July 15, 2002
Construction Meeting Minutes
US Post Office - Mound, MN
July 11, 2002
Attendees:
Rod Dietrich - Owner
Bruce Chamberlain - Hoisington Koegler Group (representing City of Mound)
Vic Colway - Tech Builders
File# 3063M1
Distribution:
Rod Dietrich - Owner Vic Colway - Tech Builders
Sarah Smith - City of Mound Bob Burch / Ayres Associates - Architect
Martin Hanson - US Postal Service Gene Burdick- US Postal Service
Bruce Chamberlain - Hoisington Koegler Group (representing City of Mound)
David Greischar - Tech Builders Doug Reeves - Tech Builders
Appropriate Subcontractors
Activities on site / Progress:
· Footings / foundations expected to be complete July 15.
· Backfilling operations to begin 7/12.
· Export operations from earthwork in progress (recent rainfall has slowed export due to mud)
· Below grade plumbing is expected to begin 7/16 or 7/17.
· Below grade electrical roughins expected to begin 7/17 or 7/18.
· Placement of floor slab is expected to occur 7/22 weather provided.
Open Issues from Previous Meetings:
None
Construction Issues
1.1 Retaining wall shall be as manufactured by Keystone, color to be Ivory # 393.
1.2
Limestone sill samples were not on site at time of selections - samples will be delivered
for selection.
1.3 Fieldstone - sample on site was approved for installation, as provided by Ochs.
1.4 Brick shall be as manufactured by Hebron, color to be Golden Rod, texture to be Velour.
1
-3708-
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
Standing seam roofing, metal fascia and soffit shall all be Kynar 500 finish, color to be
Silver Metallic.
Aluminum doors and windows to be clear anodized aluminum in color.
Toilet paritions to be #97 Fashion Gray as manufactured by American Sanitary.
Marker bOards shall be Vistar Beige
Display board fabric shall be Suede.
End of notes.
This is our understanding of the subjects discussed and actions taken during the course of the
meeting. If you should find any discrepancies or items which were mistakenly inserted / omitted,
please advise immediately.
2
-3709-
-3710-
-3711 -
-3712-
THIS PAGE
IS
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
-3713-