The URL can be used to link to this page

2002-09-24PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2002 - 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 2. 3. 4. OPEN MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: SEPT 3, 2002 SPECIAL MEETING SEPT 5, 2002 SPECIAL MEETING SEPT 9, 2002 RESCHEDULED REGULAR MTG *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS *C. APPROVE CASE #02-31 STEPHAN MADSEN/FLORENCE WORNER 2586 AVON DRIVE VARIANCE *D. APPROVE CASE #02-32 MARK RECKINGER 4811 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE VARIANCE *E. APPROVE PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1 TO BUFFALO BITUMINOUS FOR WORK ON WESTEDGE BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CASE #02-34 MAHOGANY BAY 2642 COMMERCE BOULEVARD CUP AMENDMENT 4392 4393 4394-4400 4401-4426 4427-4449 4450-4473 4474-4479 4480-4522 7. ACTION ON REQUEST BY GILLESPIE CENTER TO WAIVE CHARGES 4523-4524 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. o TODD CHRISTOPHERSON OF AMCON: UPDATE AND DISCUSSION ON PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY PROJECT, WITH ACTION ON BID PACKAGE # 1 4525-4529 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. ACTION ON CASE #02-16/36 KELLY & VERONICA JOHNSON 2331 DRIFTWOOD LANE MINOR SUBD, HARDCOVER VARIANCE 4530-4545 ACTION ON CASE #02-30/33 STEVE BEDELL/CHARLES & ALICE MACNAMARA 5925 RIDGEWOOD ROAD WAIVER OF PLATTING, VARIANCE 4546-4573 10. ACTION ON RESOLUTION TO DENY THE REQUEST FROM TIM BECKER AND DALE AND LORELL BECKER TO REZONE LOTS 5-8, BLOCK 4, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-1A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 4574-4575 11. ACTION ON PROPOSED REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - ANTHONY' S FLORAL 4576-4585 12. ACTION ON CASE #02-35 CITY OF MOUND LOTS 23-38, KOEHLER'S ADDITION WAIVER OF PLATTING 4586-4599 13. WESTEDGE BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A. ACTION ON RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED 4600-4604 AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT B. ACTION RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT 4605 14. DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER V, SECTION 1000 - NUISANCE ABATEMENT 4606-4619 15. ACTION SETTING SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOPS JOINT MEETING WITH CITY OF ORONO ON FIRE CONTRACT 2003 BUDGET 16. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Correspondence: Mound Westonka Schools 4620-4630 B. Report: charitable gambling proceeds 4631 C. Report: Finance Department through Aug 2002 4632-4634 D. Report: Redevelopment Project Team 4635-4637 E. LMCC Oct schedule 4638-4640 F. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative 4641-4644 17. ADJOURN This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. cityofmound, com. COUNCIL BRIEFING September 24, 2002 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Sept 24 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Sept 24 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Sept 2g - g:00-3:00 - Recycling Day Oct 3 - 6:30 - Joint CC meeting with Orono CC Oct 10 - 4:30-6:30 - Mound Magical History Tour Nov 5 - General and Local Election Nov 11 - Closed for Veteran's Day Nov 12 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Nov 12 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Nov 14 & 15 Police Chief interviews Nov 26 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Nov 26 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Dec 2 - 7:00 - Special meeting for Truth in Taxation and other business Dec 9 - 7:00 - Continuation for Truth in Taxation and other business, if needed Dec 10 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Absences Sept 12-22 Sept 28-Oct 2 Dec 24-29 Mayor Meisel Kandis Hanson Kandis Hanson ICMA Conference Holiday vacation #7. Gillespie Center The charges against the Gillespie Center, amounting to nearly $7,000, are land use and construction related costs incurred by during the development and build stages of the project. It is my recommendation that these fees be waived and be considered another means by which we contribute to the Center. Our cooperative agreement is working well with them and they frequently show their thanks by having the Parks and Public Works staff for a meal. #15. Council Workshops The City of Orono has accepted our invitation to a meeting on their fire contract. It is scheduled for 6:30 p.m., Oct 3. Meetings need to be set to discuss the 2003 Budget. One action for all will suffice. MOUND CITY COUNCIUHRA MINUTES SEPTEMBER 3, 2002 The City Council and HRA of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in joint special session on Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Tom Stokes, Chuck Alcon, 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel opened the meeting at 6:30 p.m. 2. WORKSHOP ON DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT Members and representatives of Mound Harbor Renaissance, LLC, were present to discuss the downtown redevelopment project, including acquisition and financing options. The HRA/Council will review information with City Staff and Consultants. 3. ADJOURN MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 8:30 p.m. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -4392- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 5, 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Thursday, September 5, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers David Osmek and Mark Hanus. Members Absent: Councilmembers Bob Brown and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Jeff Andersen, Miles Britz, Nancy Schultz, Finance Director Gino Businaro. 1. OPEN MEETING The meeting was called to order at 6:37 p.m. by Mayor Meisel. 2. WORKSHOP ON PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY ISSUES Chief Pederson presented the bids that were opened on September 4. Due to poor soils, bids were approximately $250,000 over the estimated amount. Discussion took place with regards to the feasibility of delaying the project start date, which would save the typical Fall/Winter construction costs. Some of the bid overage could be made up by doing a comprehensive bid package, along with not having to do the extensive soil work that would be necessary for a Fall/Winter project. Discussion took place regarding the proposed lease for temporary housing for the fire department. Pederson informed the Council that John Dean will move forward to get First Right of Refusal on the lease. The Public Safety Facility Groundbreaking scheduled for September 17th is hereby cancelled. 3. REVIEW AND DISCUSS CORRESPONDENCE WITH CONTRACT CITIES Discussion took place regarding the contracts with the neighboring cities that Mound Fire Department services. It was noted that a RFP was received from Orono for fire coverage. It was the consensus of the Council to try to set up a meeting with Orono to discuss fire coverage, on October 3, 2002. Hanson will determine if this date is agreeable to the City of Orono. 4. ADJOURN MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 9:35 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -4393- CITY OF MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SEPTEMBER 9, 2002 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound, Minnesota, met in the regular session on Tuesday, September 9, 2002, at 7:25 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Chairperson Pat Meisel, Commisisoners Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, Dave Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: Acting City Attorney Paula Callies, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Finance Director Gino Businaro and Executive Director Kandis Hanson. 1. OPEN MEETING Chairperson Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:25 pm 2. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Brown, seconded Hanus to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. APPROVE MINUTES MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown, to approve the minutes of the August 27, 2002 regular meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. ACTION ON RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE TAX LEVY FOR THE MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE YEAR 2003 MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown, to adopt the following resolution as presented, All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-1 OH' RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE TAX LEVY FOR THE MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMMENT AUTHORITY' FOR THE YEAR 2003. 5. ADJOURN MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 7:27 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Chairperson Pat Meisel Attest: Executive Director, Kandis Hanson -4394- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 9, 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Monday, September 9, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Engineer John Cameron, City Attorney Paula Callies, Steve Coddon, Deb Grand Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVE AGENDA Mayor Meisel requested that Item 7 be changed to reflect that no action will be taken however an informational update will be given on the public safety building project. Mayor Meisel also requested that Item11 will be removed as recommended by Community Development Director Smith due to an unforeseen delay in the applicant receiving the resolution in advance of the meeting. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Meyer asked that Item # 4B - payment of claims be removed from the Consent Agenda as he has a question on Page 4842 regarding the irrigation charges for MetroPlains. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of the August 27, 2002 meeting. -4395- Mound City Council Minutes - September 9, 2002 4B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Meyer indicated that his position on the irrigation has been clear the entire time and commented that the budget is tight yet we are playing $10,000 for an irrigation system for the new park at Village by the Bay. Gino Businaro indicated that this is being paid by MetroPlains as it is coded as an escrow on the list of claims. MOTION BY Hanus seconded by Brown seconded to pay the bills. The following voted in favor: Hanus, Osmek, Brown and Meisel. Meyer voted against. Motion carried. 5. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA None were offered. 6. 2003 PROPOSED BUDGET 6A. Action on Resolution Approving the 2003 Preliminary General Fund budqet in the amount of $3,883,250; Setting the Preliminary Levy at $2,814,110; and Approving the Preliminary Overall Budqet for 2003 City Manager Hanson recapped the budget process. Starting in late June, City staff reviews where we are in the year and requests that Department Heads submit their budget requests. A workshop was held in late August at which time the City Council reviewed all departmental requests for capital expenditures. Hanson indicated that several things have happened since that time which may change things a little. Gino Businaro indicated that the estimated revenue for 2003 is $3.5M which is the projected amount we will take in 2003. Similarly, the expenditures will be $3.8 M therefore the difference is $355,000. Businaro also reviewed the line items of the preliminary budget. The proposed levy of $2,814,100 will be certified to Hennepin County upon approval by the City Council. The special taxing district of the Mound HRA will also certify a levy of 83,000. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION No. 02-88: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2003 PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,833,250; SETTING THE PRELIMINARY LEVY AT $2,814,110; AND APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY OVERALL BUDGET FOR 2003. Hanus indicated that the budget is preliminary and we have a long way to go and further comment that it is the worse case scenario. -4396- Mound City Council Minutes - September 9, 2002 6B. Action on Resolution Approving a Levy Not To Exceed $83,000 for the Purpose of Defraying the Cost of Operation, Pursuant to the Provisions of MSS 469, of the Housin.q and Redevelopment Authority of and For the City of Mound for the Year 2003 MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the following resolution. All in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-89: RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEVY NOT TO EXCEED $83,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSS 469, OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE YEAR 2003. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING Jeff Anderson was present to give the City Council an update regarding the public safety building. He read a memorandum from Chief Pederson which explained the opening of the bids which took place on September 4th. Due to poor soils, we came in over $250,000 over the estimated amount. Hanus indicated that it is important to note that the $250,000 overage can be made up by postponing the project start and doing a comprehensive bid package. Mr. Anderson indicated that the new estimated start date is Mamh 1. Completion would be in Nov/Dec. 2003. By starting in Spring, the project will not take as long. In the interest of saving monies, the postponing action while not favored, makes sense. He further cautioned about the possibility of inflation. By waiting until Spring, Todd Christenson believes that some of the typical costs associated with Winter construction will be saved. Mayor Meisel indicated that the information which was shared last Thursday at a special meeting and further commented that she knows that it is not an easy decision to postpone. She thanked them for their fiscal responsibility. Jeff reiterated that the recommendation to delay comes to the City Council from both the Public Safety Project Team and the Public Safety Design Team. Hanus indicated that the five (5) month postponement will save $250,000. Hanus further commented that we still got the better bond rate and that the City has saved $1.4M by selling bonds this year. Jeff further commented that the Project Team studied 6-7 other options. Hanus confirmed that everyone is united on this decision. 8. 2002 RETAINING WALL PROJECT Cameron explained that the project and recommended that the bid be awarded to the lowest bidder which is Sunram Construction in the amount of $189,837. All pertinent information is included in the packet. MOTION BY Hanus, seconded by Osmek, to award the bid for the 2002 retaining wall project to Sunram Construction in the amount of $189,837. All voted in favor. Motion carried. -4397- Mound City Council Minutes - September 9, 2002 9. ABATEMENT OF CONDITIONS CREATING A HAZARDOUS PROPERTY 2957 CAMBRIDGE LANE Cameron gave background regarding Skaalerud retaining wall matter including the draft resolution which is included in the City Council packet. City Attorney Callies explained that the abatement procedure is included in statute. The order will be served to the property owner and abated accordingly with all costs to be assessed Kandis indicated that the cost of the retaining wall will be in the realm of $70,000. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown seconded to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-90: RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF CONDITIONS CREATING A HAZARDOUS PROPERTY AT 2957 CAMBRIDGE LANE The City Council took a recess from 9:10 PM to 9:22 PM. 10. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION A. Action on Proposed Amendments to Chapter V, Section 1000 - Nuisance Ordinance. Community Development Director Smith gave an overview of the proposed amendments to City Code Section 1000 - Nuisance Ordinance which was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 19, 2002 and recommended for approval. Ms. Smith also indicated that the Planning Commission would like to pursue an additional amendment(s) to address portable temporary structures and further commented that the proposed new language to City Code Section 350 regarding screening requires that a public hearing be held therefore no action is required on this item. Hanus indicated that he would like to see a copy of the proposed new ordinance presented in "strike-out / edit" form prior to taking any action. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to table action on the proposed amendments to the Nuisance Ordinance until the September 24, 2002 at which time an edited version of the new nuisance ordinance will be included. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 10.ACTION ON RESOLUTION TO DENY REQUEST FROM TIM BECKER AND DALE AND LORELL BECKER TO REZONE LOTS 5-8, BLOCK 47 REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FROM R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-lA SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL This item was removed from the agenda during Agenda Approval and tabled until September 24, 2002 as recommended by City staff. -4398- Mound City Council Minutes - September 9, 2002 11.ACTION ON CASE# 02-27- WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUEST FROM STEVF CODDON FOR LOTS 237 247 257 387 39~ 40- BLOCK 37 LAKESIDE PARK~ A.L CROCKER'S 1ST DIVISION Community Development Director Smith provided an overview of the request from Steven Coddon for waiver of platting approval to combine and subdivide the (6) former tax-forfeit lots which he purchased in May 2002 from Hennepin County and commented that the proposed new lots meet the minimum requirements of the R-2 District and that waiver of platting requests do not require review by the Planning Commission but may be remanded for review if the City Council so desires. Discussion took place regarding proposed Parcel A which includes Lots 23 and 40 due to its long and narrow configuration. Several members of the City Council questioned whether a viable building pad exists and by consensus agreed that it may be beneficial to forward the application to the Planning Commission for additional review. Steve Coddon indicated that while house plans were not included with the application materials, he has preliminary plans to build a 2-story structure on this lot which would meet the requirements of the R-2 District and would not require any variances. Meyer indicated that he believed the application could be acted upon as it meets the requirements of the R-2 District and that the City Council recently took action on a similar request. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to remand the waiver of platting request from Steve Coddon to the Planning Commission for review at its September 16, 2002 meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Members of the City Council also stated that the request could be included on the Consent Agenda at the September 24, 2002 meeting following review by the Planning Commission. 12. INFORMATION / MISCELLANEOUS A. LMCD correspondence B. Report: Finance Department through July 2002 C. Report: Police Department through August 2002 D. Article: Tour shows different ways of building communities E. Article: How much is redevelopment worth? F. MFRA (Engineering firm) staff G, Notices of charitable gambling donations from VFVV H. FYI: Notice of status with MCWD I. Newsletter: Springstead J. Newsletter: Gillespie K, Redevelopment update. -4399- Mound City Council Minutes - September g, 2002 Meisel also reminded members of the Council regarding the dedication ceremony planned for the 911 monument at Veteran's Park to be held on Wed. September 11, 2002 at 4:30 PM. 13. ADJOURN MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -4400- SEPTEMBER 24, 2002 CITY COUNCIL M EETIN(' 081302SUE $400.00 090502SUE $600.00 091102SUE $2,549.81 091802SU E $20,656.81 092402S U E $350,159.31 TOTAL $374,365.93 -4401 - GITY OF MOUND Payments 09/13/02 8:49 AM Page I Current Period: September 2002 Batch Name . 081302SUE User DollarAmt $400.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $400.00 Refer 91302 RAMSEY COUNTY COURTHOUSE Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow Invoice 091302 $0.00 In Balance 9/24/2002 WARRANT 02-1082/6750 BRECKHEIMER, SCOTT $400.00 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $400.00 Fund Summary lOl GENERAL FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $400.00 $400.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $400.00 $400.00 -4402- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:36 AM Page I Batch Name 0905025UE Payment Current Period: September 2002 II ~' I1! I Computer Doliar Amt $600.00 Posted Refer 90502 Cash Payment HICKS, TROY AND REBECCA E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Ck# 008193 9/5/2002 EASEMENT WESTEDGE BLVD Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Invoice 090502 Transaction Date 9/512002 Fund Summary 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $600,00 Total BATCH Total $600.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $600.00 $o.oo $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 -4403- (;ITY 01= MOUND 09/11/02 2:51 PM Page Payments Current Period: September 2002 Batch Name 091102SUE User Dollar Amt $2,549.81 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $2,549.81 Refer 91102 FACKLER, JAMES G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical Cash Payment Invoice 090402 Transactlon Date $0.00 In Balance 9/11/2002 REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $257.95 MarqueU. e Bank Mou 10100 Total Refer 91102 FIRE CHIEF, MN ASSOCIATION 9/11/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REFIGSTRATION OCT 17-20 PALM, MIKE $135.00 Invoice 090902 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $135.00 Refer 91102 GOODYEAR T/RES 9/11/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRE $280.44 Invoice 077663 Transaction Date 9/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $280.44 Refer 91102 HENTGES, MATTHEW 9/11/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies ADVANCE 09-20/09-22 VIRGINIA, MN $350.00 Invoice 091102 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $350.00 .efer 91102 MORAN, ALLAN AND LINDA 9/11/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs TEST WELL $1,000.00 Invoice 091102 Transaction Date 9/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,000.00 Refer 91102 RAHN, JODIL. 9/11/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41115-430 Miscellaneous 09-11 MEMORIAL SERVICE $31.60 Invoice 091102 Transaction Date 9/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $31.60 Refer 91102 SMOKE-EASTER PUBLICATIONS 9/11/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 62 SUBSCRIPTIONS $310.00 Invoice 091102 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $310.00 Refer 91102 SPEEDWAYSUPERAMERICA (FIR 9/11/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-22-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $184,82 Invoice 082202 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $184.82 -4404- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/11/02 2:51 PM Page 2 Current Period: September 2002 Fund Summary 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $569.99 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $979.82 601 WATER FUND $1,000.00 $2,549.81 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $2,549.81 $2,549.81 -4405- GITY OP MOUND Payments 09119102 10;37 AM Page Current Period: September 2002 Batch Name 091802SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $20,656.81 Posted Refer 91802 KESTNER, AL Ck# 008290 9/18/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical and Dental Fees 2002 SAFETY LENS REIMBURSE $370.00 Invoice 091002 · Transaction. Date 9/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette-BankMou 10100 Totals- $370:00 Refer 91802 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Ck# 008289 9/18/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-3555 $288.40 Invoice 090202 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-0646 $18.80 Invoice 090202 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells CREDIT 472-0680 -$11,43 Invoice 090202 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells CREDIT 472-0680 Invoice 090202 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $284.33 Refer 91802 SPEEDWAYSUPERAMERICA (POL Ck# 008294 9/18/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES Invoice 082602 ?ransaction Date 9/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $1,166.71 Total $1,166.71 Refer 91802 RECYCLING ASSOCIATION MINNE Ck# 008293 9/18/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-434 Conference & Training 2002-2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES Invoice 930 PO 17327 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $65.00 Total $65.00 Refer 91802 RECYCLING ASSOCIATION MINNE Ck# 008293 9/18/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION FALL CONFERENCE Invoice 091802 PO 17328 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $165.00 Total $165.O0 Refer 91802 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment Invoice 091802 Cash Payment Invoice 091802 Cash Payment Invoice 091802 Cash Payment Invoice 091802 Cash Payment Invoice 091802 Cash Payment Invoice 091802 Cash Payment Invoice 091802 ~ash Payment 091802 Cash Payment invoice 091802 E 602.49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601.49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 222.42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells Ck# 008295 9/18/2002 09-02 590.4351 PAN 09-02 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCK 09-02 296-9058 FINANCE 09-02 590-4351 PAN 09-02 590-4351 PAN 09-02 723-7560 MOUND FIRE 09-02 751-3572 ENGINE #18 09-02 751-3573 MOUND FIRE 09-02 750-2666 FIRE CHIEF $8.51 $8.39 $8.39 $8.52 $8.52 $0.98 $0.98 $2.74 $22.28 -4406- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:37 AM Page 2 Current Period: September 2002 ~1~i '111111 I '1 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 91802 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO Ck#008291 9/18/2002 Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib REPLACE #8133 BALANCE DUE Invoice 091802 Cash Payment E 895-49990-t24 Fire Pens Contrtb REPLACE #8133 09-02 FIRE RELIEF Invoice 091802 Total $69.31 $110.00 $9,088.33 Invoice 091802 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $18,286.66 Refer 91802 MOUND POST OFFICE Ck# 008292 9/18/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $124.90 Invoice 091802 Cash Payment E 602-49456-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $124.90 Invoice 091802 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $249.80 Fund Summary BATCH Total $20,656.81 10100 Marque~eBank Mound $1,179.55 $323.77 $133.42 $503.41 $230.00 $18,286.66 $20,656.81 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND Pre-Wdtten Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $20,656.81 $0 .o0 $20,656.81 -4407- crPf OF MOUND Payments OgllglO~ 10',30 AM Page I Current Period: September 2002 Batch Name 0924025UE User Dollar Amt $350,159.31 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $350,159.31 $0.00 In Balance Refer 92402 AMCON 912412002 Cash Payment E 40146580-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG $16,045.44 Invoice 2433 T~nc3ctio.-. D-~te 9/!7/2002 Refer 92402 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INCO Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. Invoice 50681 Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. PAGER REPAIR $117.59 Invoice 50921 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $213.59 Refer 92402 APF EMERGENCY REPAIR 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs VEHICLE INSPECTIONS $235.00 Invoice 213144 Transaction Date 9/1612002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $235,00 9~24~2002 BATTERY FOR PAGER $96,00 Refer 92402 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice M0225404 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice M7225007 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Mtsc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice MB224612 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $107.40 $170.32 $133,20 Total $410.92 Refer 92402 A WD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Transaction Date E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 08-02WATER #10213300 08-02WATER #10213300 MarqueEe Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92402 BELLBOY CORPORATION 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS Invoice 36081000 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS Invoice 36080900 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 24540400 Transaction~Date 9/18/2002 u~ ......... Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,990.28 Refer 92402 $33.64 $33.64 Total $67.28 $125.13 $199.40 $2,665.75 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC. 8/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-02 #1307131-08002-0200 GARBAGE $31.86 Invoice 092402 Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-02#1307131-08002-0200 GARBAGE $31,66 Invoice 092402 Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-02 #13071431-08002-0200 GARBAGE $31,67 invoice 092402 -4408- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 2 Cash Payment Invoice 092402 Cash Payment Invoice 092402 Cash Payment Invoice 092402 Current Period: September 2002 II1' III ~' '~'~'"~. '11 I I"11 I ,~i, "I'1 E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-02 #1307032-08002-0200 GARBAGE E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-03 #1307149-08002-0200 GARBAGE E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-02 #8003980-08002-0429 GARBAGE ............. Cash-Payment-.-.-E-~-0-1--43100=384-Refuse/Ga rbag e Dispos--08,~3972-08002-0429~$~REETS i,,vuiu~ G~2402 I! ...... ~ $67.01 $184.10 $17.76 $20.39 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $384.25 Refer 92402 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTRO0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W170324 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W170325 Transaction Date 9/12/2002 9/24/2002 08-02 PORTABLE RESTROOMS CENTERVEIW 08-02 PORTABLE RESTROOMS MOUND BAY PaRk $264.22 $434.52 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $698.74 Refer 92402 BRAND NETWORKING 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract REPAIR COMPUTERS Invoice 15483 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract APC 700 SMART UPS Invoice 15468 PO 17427 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $287.50 $472.85 Total $760.35 Refer 92402 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs WESTEDGE IMPROVEMENTS Invoice #1 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92402 CAHNERS CONSTRUCTION BULLE Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 2136597 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 2134417 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 2127950 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 08-23-02 LEGAL RETAINING WALL REPLACE 08-16-02 LEGAL RETAINING WALL REPLACE 08-09-02 LEGAL RETAINING WALL REPLACE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $43,606.10 Total $43,606.10 $105.53 $105.53 $105.53 $316.59 Refer 92402 CHADWICK AND MERTZ Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees Invoice 090302 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Refer 92402 CHAMPION AUTO 9/24/2002 08-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $4,402.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,402.00 9/24/2002 $15.41 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair UNDERCOAT, BRACKET, ETC Invoice D160204 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 9~02 CONco, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal Invoice 092402 Total $15.41 9/24/2002 10-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $514,62 -4409- CITY OI= MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10;30 AM PaGe 3 Current Period: September 2002 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 10-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $447.22 Invoice 092402 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $961.84 Refer 92402 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply DIAPHRAM, FLIPPER $123.86 invoice 21383 C-~'§ ~-FA"~)~-~ ' E' ~02-'~!;~4,~b:-2~0-~-~T~i ~'~'~ ~i~ ........... i~i~P'~l i~,U i"~] ~-~= 'R~ ............................................... ~i'~,~ ~ ~-5 Invoice 37489 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $247.71 Refer 92402 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs& Maint Contract 08-02 COPIER MAINTENANCE $340.80 Invoice 26979 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 08-02 OVER ALLOWED $6.41 Invoice 26979 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $347.21 Refer 92402 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $33.80 Invoice 191127 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,192.41 Invoice 191120 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,110.15 Invoice 190350 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,336.36 Refer 92402 DELL MARKETING L,P. 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER invoice 921613055 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER Invoice 921613055 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER Invoice 921613055 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92702 DOCKMASTERS OF LAKE MINNET 9/27/2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-440 Other Contractual Servic DOCK SECTIONS Invoice 200209 Transaction Date 9/5/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92402 E-Z RECYCLING 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 09-02 CURBSIDE RECYCLING Invoice 4202 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Refer 92402 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment Invoice 294890 Cash Payment Invoice 294341 Payment Invoice 292134 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 9/24/2002 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $220.04 $440.06 $440.06 Total $1,100.16 $1,500.00 Total $1,500.00 $7,700.00 Total $7,700.00 $4,407.90 $1,212.40 $77.00 -4410- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 4 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Current Period: September 2002 ~1111!1! ' III ' Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92402 Cash Payment Invoice 19913 Cash Payment Invoice 19914 C.n.~h Pmym~nt EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs I:: 4nl-4Rfi4[').R~Cl Prnf~_~_~innnl ~rv~ .9/24/2002 08-02 PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES 08-02 PROJECT MANAGEMETN 0R-02 ~.Un!TOR~ RoAD Total $5,697.30 $75.00 $3,000.00 $!50.00 Invoice 19915 Cash Payment Invoice 19916 Cash Payment Invoice 41963 Cash Payment Invoice 41967 Cash Payment Invoice 41970 Transaction Date 9/19/2002 08-02 HOTEL DISTRICT 08-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 08-02 POST OFFICE PROJECT 08-02 FIRE STATION PROJECT Refer 92702 Cash Payment Invoice 092702 Cash Payment Invoice 092702 Cash Payment invoice 092702 Cash Payment Invoice 092702 G 101-22908 Landform Development G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs EXCELSIOR FLORIST G 101-22808Adopt A Green Space G 101-22808 Adopt A Green Space G101-22808AdoptAGreen Space G 101-22808 Adopt A Green Space Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $375.00 $112.50 $112.50 $675.00 .9/2712002 1999 ADOPT GREEN SPACE 2000 ADOPT GREEN SPACE 2001 ADOPT GREEN SPACE 2002 ADOPT GREEN SPACE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 9/24/2002 10100 $4,500.00 $150.00 $180.00 $190.00 $130.00 Total $650.00 $32.00 Total $32,00 $53.25 $166,14 $86.21 Transaction Date 9/5/2002 Refer 92402 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 77304 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou Refer 92402 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSOC MINN . 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training STUDY GUIDE Invoice 47711 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training CALCULATOR Invoice 47646 Cash Payment E 222-42260-208 Instructional Supplies Invoice 47789 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICATION Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $305.60 Refer 92402 FLANAGAN SALES, INCORPORA T Cash Payment Invoice 328515 .9/24/2002 TEETER TOOTER Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10576 PO 17257 Transaction Date 9/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92402 G & K SERVI S ..9/24/2002 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-10-02 UNIFORMS $684,80 Total $684.80 $29.24 -4411 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10;30 AM Page 5 Current Period: September 2002 ~, ?.. ~ , :~ :~ Cash Payment Invoice 328515 Cash Payment Invoice 328515 Cash Payment Invoice 328515 CasfT-Payme~t- E601--~9~00-~230-Shop-Matedafs- ........... 09=I-~-02--MA-T~ Invoice 328515 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 09-10-02 UNIFORMS $29.24 09-10-02 UNIFORMS $29.25 09-10-02 MATS $29.65 $29?65 Cash Payment Invoice 328515 Cash Payment Invoice 321656 Cash Payment Invoice 321654 Cash Payment Invoice 321653 Cash Payment Invoice 321653 Cash Payment Invoice 321653 Cash Payment Invoice 321653 Payment Invoice 321653 Cash Payment Invoice 321653 Transaction Date E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 09-10-02 MATS E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 09-03-02 MATS E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 09-03-02 MATS E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 9/18/2002 09-03-02 UNIFORMS 09-03-02 UNIFORMS 09-03-02 UNIFORMS 09-03-02 MATS 09-03-02 MATS 09-03-02 MATS Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $29.65 $44.O9 $52.82 $27.26 $27.26 $27.27 $12.24 $12.24 $12.24 Total $392.10 Refer 92402 GLASS PLUS, INCORPORATED 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPLACE WINDSHIELD Invoice 8443 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total Refer 92402 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies invoice 083102 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Date 9/9/2002 Refer 92402 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies E 601-49400-210 Ope~ting Supplies E 602-49450-210 Opemting Supplies 9/24/2002 08-02WATER #32345800 08-02WATER #5158500 08-02WATER #5158500 08-02WATER #5158501 08-02WATER #5158502 08-02WATER #5158502 08-02WATER #5158502 MarqueEe Bank Mou 10100 Total 9/24/2002 $299.05 $299.05 $62.91 $39.60 $39.60 $56.65 $14.47 $14.47 $14.46 $242.16 -4412- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 6 Cash Payment Invoice 51495 Transaction Date G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow 9/12/2002 Current Period: September 2002 I~_~.:~'::~_ -- -~-~-.~: ......... /' ~ '~'11 -T~ ....... '1 '11 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 596377 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 596376 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 592777 T,~,,~uLion Dui= 9f1-8/2002 Marquette Banir~ou 10100 Refer 92402 HARRELL, LEONARD 9/24/2002 RETIREMENT GIFT Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $568.96 $2,044.62 $1,445.39 total $4,UbU.~7 Total $50.00 $50.00 Refer 92402 HART, PATRICK 9124/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves REIMBURSE SHOTGUN ACCESSORIES Invoice 090302 PO 17440 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total Refer 92402 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice DM78770 Transaction Date 9/16/2002 Refer 92402 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment Invoice 41820 Cash Payment Invoice 41820 Cash Payment Invoice 41820 Cash Payment Invoice 41839 Cash Payment Invoice 41839 Cash Payment Invoice 41839 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Refer 92402 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMA TIO E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 9/24/2002 CONTAINERS (7) Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $78.30 9/24/2002 PIPE, ETC PIPE, ETC PIPE, ETC TUBE, ETC TUBE, ETC TUBE, ETC Marquette Bank Mou 9/24/2002 10100 Total $78,30 Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 08-02 NETWORK SUPPORT Marquette Bank Mou 10100 9/24/2002 08-02 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 08-02 HENTGES JOINT POWERS 08-02 LANGDON BAY TRAIL 08-02 5344 RAMBLER LANE SITE REVIEW $35.00 $35.00 $29.08 $29.08 $29.08 $2O.34 $20.34 $20.34 $148.26 Invoice 22087036 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Refer 92402 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 091002-A Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 091002-B1 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 091002-B2 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 091002-B3 Total $35.97 $35.97 $1,174.87 $37.50 $577.50 $37.50 -4413- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09119/02 10:30 AM Page 7 Current Period: September 2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional 8rvs $112.50 invoice 091002-B4 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs $2.432.87 invoice 091002-B5 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs $1,779.75 invoice 091002~C Cash, P~yment G ,~e~-22~,96-L-ake-Mtka-T-rait-Sub-di~-2- 08--82-MiNNETOh~KA T-RAtL-S-PL%T $15000 invoice 091002-D1 08-02 ANTHONY'S FLORAL RESEARCH 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING 08-02 TIF RELATED WORK Cash Payment G 101-22857 Three Points, Becket Propert 08-02 BECKER REZONING Invoice 091002-D2 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE Invoice 091002-E Transaction Date 9/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $37.50 $460.00 Total $6,799.99 Refer 92402 IFP TEST SERVICES, INC, Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 080702 PO 17441 Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 080702 PO 17441 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 9/24/2002 PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM SWENSEN, JASON $350.00 PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM SUSSMAN, M $350.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $700.00 Refer 92402 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 10-02 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL SPACE $4,342.00 invoice 092402 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,342.00 Refer 92402 ISLAND PARK SKELL Y 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OXYGEN SENSOR, ETC $294.52 Invoice 11178 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR TURN SIGNAL $33.00 Invoice 11409 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REMAN ALTERNATOR $422.22 invoice 11277 Transaction Date 9/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $749.74 Refer 92402 JEFFERSON FIRE AND SAFETY, IN 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies BOOT LEATHE invoice 092184 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $1,137.27 Total $1,137.27 Refer 92402 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR AUTO $3,686.05 Invoice 17496 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,686.05 Refer 92402 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs 2002 SUMMER NEWSLETTER $2,242.39 Invoice 45577 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,242.39 Refer 92402 JMS COMMUNICATIONS AND RES Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs $220.00 Invoice 090614 9/24/2002 06-01-02 THRU 08-30-02 NEWS RELEASE -4414- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 8 Current Period: September 2002 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Refer 92402 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS Cash Payment Invoice 607903 Transaction Date E 101-41410-200 Office Supplies 9/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total 9/24/2002 CONTACT PAPER $220.00 $4.80 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4.80 F~efer 9:>4,02 JOHr~SON uRO)HERS 9124/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1455133 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1455132 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 201602 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1452732 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1452731 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1452730 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1452729 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1452728 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Refer 92402 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS $1,261.35 $1,425.85 -$9.65 $1,195.50 $659.25 $83.00 $27O.6O $1,511.14 Cash Payment Invoice 092402 Cash Payment Invoice 092402 Transaction Date Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,397.04 9/24/2002 1002 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $27%04 10-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $398.07 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $669.11 E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 9/17/2002 Refer 92402 LAKER NEWSPAPER 9/24/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22860 2642 Commerce, Bristol Clas 09-14-02 CUP NOTICE Invoice 353 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92402 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 10'1-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply ALUMINUM TAG invoice 9615463 Cash Payment E 281-45210-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 9615470 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 9647963 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Refer 92402 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CIITES CABLE TIES MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Marquette Bank Mou 10100 9/24/2002 $35.82 Total $35.82 $32.59 $137.04 $574.78 Total $744.41 Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 ANNUAL DUES Invoice 090102 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 92402 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT ...9/24/2002 $6,265.00 Total $6,265.00 -4415- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 9 Current Period: September 2002 -- - _ ...... ~ ......... .._ _×~. __ ,~ Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials DEPTH GAUGE $5.86 invoice A039068 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5.88 Refer 92402 LOWELL'S AUTOMOTIVE 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair BLADE $16.25 invoice 50348384 Fi, neb P'nyment E i01-~5200-404 Repa!m/.M~_)nt .Mach)ne.W ROTER A.ND BP.~,KE PADS $g0.46 Invoice 5-347185 Transaction Date 91912002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $96.71 Refer 92402 MADDEN, FRANK AND ASSOCIA T 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 080102 Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 090102 Transaction Date 9/6/2002 Refer 92402 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment Invoice 456156 Cash Payment Invoice 456155 Cash Payment Invoice 454797 Cash Payment Invoice 453761 Transaction Date THRU 07-31-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 08-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total 9/24/2002 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $557.80 $219.90 $777.70 $21.95 $4,109.50 $515.00 $1,745.10 $6,391.55 Refer 92402 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI Cash Payment Invoice 40972 Cash Payment Invoice 40973 Cash Payment invoice 40974 Cash Payment Invoice 40975 Cash Payment Invoice 40976 Cash Payment Invoice 40977 Cash Payment Invoice 40978 Cash Payment Invoice 40979 Cash Payment Invoice 40980 Cash Payment Invoice 40981 Invoice 40982 E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 9/24/2002 08-02 WESTEDGE MISC ENGINEERING 08-02 WESTEDGE WATERMAIN EXTENSION 08-02 BLDG MISC ENGINEERING 08-02 P/Z MISC ENGINEERING 08-02 STREETS MISC ENGINEERING 08-02 PARKS MISC ENGINEERING 08-02 STORM SEWER PROJECT 08-02 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 08-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 08-02 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT 08-02 DOWNTOWN TIF DISTRICT $7,917.20 $998.60 $643.50 $340.50 $229.00 $49.50 $198,00 $210.00 $792,O0 $643,50 $99,00 -4416- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 10 Cash Payment Invoice 40983 Cash Payment Invoice 40984 Cash Payment Invoice 40985 Invoice 40986 Current Period: September 2002 ',1 ~v-- i ~,, II 1111111111 G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 08-02 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 POST OFFICE MISC ENGINEERING 08-02 MCES LIFT STATION G8-02 WESTEDGE EX:i.'=NSiON SOUTH $841.50 $142.50 $1,188.00 $93~ O0 Cash Payment Invoice 40987 Cash Payment Invoice 40988 Cash Payment Invoice 40989 Cash Payment Invoice 40990 Cash Payment Invoice 40991 Cash Payment Invoice 40992 Cash Payment Invoice 40993-A Cash Payment Invoice 40993-B Cash Payment Invoice 40993-C Cash Payment Invoice 40994 Cash Payment invoice 40995 Cash Payment Invoice 40996 Cash Payment Invoice 40997 Cash Payment Invoice 40998 Cash Payment Invoice 40999 Cash Payment Invoice 41000. Cash Payment Invoice 41001 Cash Payment Invoice 41002 Cash Payment Invoice 41003 Cash Payment Invoice 41004 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs E 281-45210-300 Professional Srvs E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 XCEL SUB-STATION 08-02 ECKLUND/BRENSHELL MINOR SUB #01-05 08-20 SKATE PARK 08-02 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT 08-02 SHORELINE FOOTAGE 08-02 WELL/PUMPHOUSE 08-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION G 101-22891 Kells Lane Vacation, J. Paul 08-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION G 101-22895 Kells Lane Vacation Jeff Paul 08-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 6384 WALNUT GRADING PERMIT G 101-22860 2642 Commerce, Bristol Clas 08-02 MAHOGANY BAY CUP G 101-22890 2957 Cambridge Retain Wall 08-02 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 08-02 METRO PLAINS ASSESSMENT · 08-02 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT G 101-22896 Lake Mtka Trail Sub-div ~K)2- 08-02 LAZNIARZ PROPERTY E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING G 101-22899 Pastuck Natural Homes #02- 08-02 PASTUCK SUB-DIVISION G 101-22908 Landform Development 08-02 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 1708 DOVE LANE DRAINAGE ISSUE $346.50 $49.50 $254.50 $7,378.70 $170.00 $957.00 $16.50 $16.50 $16.50 $198,00 $49.50 $2,589.40 $3,011.00 $452.30 $6,925.20 $314.40 $121.50 $112.80 $284.50 $148.50 -4417- CiTY OF MOUND Payments 09119102 10:30 AM Page 11 Current Period: September 2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 STEIN WAIVER PLATTING $223.40 Invoice 41005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PETERSON DRAINAGE COMPLAINT $328.O0 Invoice 41006 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 BARTLETT WCA VIOLATION $478.50 Invoice 40972 Tran~au[iuH D~[~ 9/19/2002 Maiqu~;.[e Ba,-,k~v~ou 10100 Tc, t~l ,~o~,o~o..~0 Refer ........ 92402 METR~"WEsT INSPECTIONS 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 BLDG INSPECTIONS $2,813.20 Invoice 091002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-170 Fire Chief-Officer Pay 08-02 FIRE INSPECTIONS $437.50 Invoice 091002 Transaction Date 9/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,250.70 Refer 92402 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR 9/24/2002 Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 08-02 SAC CHARGES $3,564.00 Invoice 083102 Transaction Date, 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,564.00 Refer 92402 MINNCOMM PAGING 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 09-02 PAGERS Invoice 20233309028 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery PAGER REPAIR Invoice 67200009024 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery PAGER REPAIR Invoice 67200009024 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery PAGER REPAIR Invoice 67200009024 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $110.35 $10.99 $10.99 $10.98 10100 Total $143.31 Refer 92402 MINNEAPOLIS DEPARTMENT HEA 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-305 Medical and Dental Fees 08-02 ANALYSIS Invoice 083102 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $64.00 10100 Total $64.00 Refer 92402 MINNESOTA COUNTYATTORNEY 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-435 Books and Pamphlets CODE BOOKS Invoice 090502 PO 17443 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $260.40 10100 Total $260.40 Refer 92402 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY A 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training DRIVING COURSE Invoice 081202 PO 17407 Transaction Date 9/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $392.00 $392.00 Refer 92402 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 10-16-02 GRAND Invoice 092402 Transaction Date 9/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total ~Refer 92402 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT 9/24/2002_ Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salades 08-02 SALARIES Invoice 083102 $15.00 $15.00 $6,199.25 -4418- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 12 Current Period: September 2002 ....... I I I i i, ii ii i ~ ' ........ 111111111111 III i Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 08-02 DRILLS $940.00 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 08-02 MAINTENANCE $1,250.00 Invoice 083102 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8,389.25 Refer 92402 MOUND, CITY OF 9/24/2002 Cash Payment G-!-0-1.,,2290~tting-4¢02J22 LJ-T-i6i-,'P¢ BI.6L Invoice 11-103027-01-04 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Refer 92402 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS 9~24~2002 $I07.-~$ Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $107.86 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-20-02 BLACKTOP $240.21 Invoice 68178 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-28-02 BLACKTOP $123.62 Invoice 68432 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-30-02 BLACKTOP $51.66 Invoice 68645 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $415.49 Refer 92402 NEOPOST 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 10-03-02 THRU 10-02-03 MAIL MACHINE $447.00 Invoice 41099058 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $447.00 Refer 92402 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPP Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply Invoice 3135449 PO 17482 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Refer 92402 NRG PROCESSING SOLLUTIONS L 9/24/2002 METER $215.48 Marquette Bank Mou .. 9/2412002 10100 Total $215.48 Cash Payment Invoice 20252 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 ' Refer 92402 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-02 BRUSH SERVICES $136.32 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $136.32 Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call Invoice 2080538 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call Invoice 2080538 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Refer 92402 OPHEEN, GAlL 9/24/2002 08-31-02 LOCATES $163.53 08-31-02 LOCATES $163.52 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $327.05 9124/2002 REFUND WATER/SEWER $78.07 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $78.07 9/2412002. Cash Payment R601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues Invoice 2411724120055 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Refer 92402 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 0197713-1N Transaction Date 9/18/2002 WINE Marquette Bank Mou $1,009.00 10100 Total $1,009.00 Refer 92402 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 9/24/2002. Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 34775321 $70.24 -4419- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/0Z 10:30 AM Page 13 Current Period: September 2002 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $70.24 Refer 92402 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC 9/2412002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $95.75 Invoice 871865 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $694.35 Invoice 871764 CASh payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale WiNE $1,6_62.50 Invoice 870700 Cash Payment Invoice 869904 Cash Payment Invoice 869903 Cash Payment invoice 869902 Transaction Date E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale 9/18/2002 WINE LIQUOR Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $90.00 $2,75O.O0 $1,026.25 $6,318.85 Refer 92402 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES Invoice 193 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES Invoice 68013 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,158.92 $1,028.30 $2,187.22 Refer 92402 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 167503-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 166858-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 166728-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 165171-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR invoice 164895-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 164820-00 9/24/20O2 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 164814.-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa CREDIT-MIX Invoice 163773-00 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8,542.46 Refer 92402 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORA TED 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E t01-45200-525 Other Capital lmproveme SIGN AT VETERAN'S PARK $949.05 Invoice 091002 Transaction Date 9/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $949.05 $2,226,39 $2,160.66 $1,389,82 $139.50 $184.75 $2,330.25 $125.24 -$14.15 Refer 92402 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies R 08021047 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 · .9/24/2002 AIR AND OXYGEN $22.79 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $22.79 -442O- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 ~AM Page 14 Current Period: September 2002 I'111 '11 I"1' Refer 92402 RIDGEVIEW BUSINESS HEALTH Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 091102 Transaction Date 9/16/2002 Refer 92402 ScHARBERAIvDs~)NS ........... ~11 II1! !! II ~ 9~24~2002 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CONSULTATION '~JL $141.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $141.00 8/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair KIT $12.08 _ Ing0ice 01 278305 Cash Payment Invoice 01 278549 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Refer 92402 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair KNIFE $74.22 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $86.30 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $10,178.47 invoice 0091615 Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $72,780.92 Invoice 0091615 Transaction Date 9/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $82,959.39 Refer 92402 SPORTING BREED KENNELS Cash Payment E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees Invoice 092402 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Refer 92402 STS CONSULTANTS ,9/2412002 10-02 DOG KENNEL FEE $325.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $325.00 Cash Payment $518.45 9/24/2002 G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00--64 THRU 06-20-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT Invoice 323423 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs THRU 07-13-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE $1,727.92 Invoice 323423 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs THRU 08-10-02 WELL SITE LAND PURCHASE $4,054.00 invoice 234072 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs THRU 08-10-02 WELL SITE LAND PURCHASE $4,270.34 Invoice 234263 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs THRU 09-07-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE $8,289.54 Invoice 234941 Transaction Date 9/912002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $18,860.25 Refer 92402 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRES $370.91 Invoice 10004708 PO 17259 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $370.91 Refer 92402 Cash Payment Invoice 090902 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Refer 92402 THORPE'DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment Invoice 273685 Cash Payment Invoice 273684 SWARTZER, BRIAN 9124/2002 E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 REIMBURSE BOOT ALLOWANCE E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale $150.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $150.00 9/24/2002 BEER $5,603.45 BEER $265.00 -4421 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 15 Current Period: September 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,446.40 Invoice 273016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $38.55 Invoice 273015 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $406.00 Invoice 232409 Transaction Date 9/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total __$~_0_~75__9.40 Refer 92402 THRIFTY WHITE DRUG STORE 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies SCRATCH PAPER Invoice 535340 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Refer 92402 THYSSEN-KRUPP ELEVATOR COR $1.05 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1.05 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 09-02 ELEVATOR SERVICE $158.60 invoice 093002 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $158.60 Refer 92402 TMB CONSULTING 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract NETWORK SERVICES $1,377.66 Invoice 05-269 Transaction Date 9/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,377.66 Refer 92402 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials HEADGEAR, ETC $45.60 invoice 198354 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials HEADGEAR, ETC $45.60 Invoice 198354 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials HEADGEAR, ETC $45.61 Invoice 198354 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply CREDIT-HEADGEAR -$9.03 Invoice 199289 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply HEADGEAR, ETC $6.48 Invoice 199290 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply HEADGEAR, ETC $6.48 Invoice 199290 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply HEADGEAR, ETC $6.48 Invoice 199290 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply CREDIT-HEADGEAR -$57.35 Invoice 6986 'Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply CREDIT-HEADGEAR -$57.35 Invoice 6986 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply CREDIT-HEADGEAR -$57.35 Invoice 6986 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials CHOP SAW $47.93 Invoice 201971 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $23.10 Refer 92402 TRI-STA TE PUMP AND CONTOL, I Cash Payment Invoice 21461 Transaction Date E 602-49450-221 Equipment Pads PO 17479 9/17/2002 .9/24/2002 SEALS AND O-RINGS $365.16 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $365.16 -4422- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 16 Current Period: September 2002 Refer 92402 TUSHIE MONTGOMERYARCHITE 9/24/2002 Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings 08-02 LIQUOR STORE PROJECT $4.307.38 Invoice 13 Transaction Date 9/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,307.38 Refer 92402 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office SuPplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.08 ...... Invoice~35153~0. Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.08 invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.08 Invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.08 Invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.08 Invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.03 Invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.03 Invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $4.54 invoice 351532-0 ~ash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $4.55 Invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies VOICEMAIL LOGS $19.88 Invoice 352486-0 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $40.27 Invoice 356240-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $80.56 Invoice 356240-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $80.56 Invoice 356240-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.76 Invoice 357649-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.76 Invoice 357649-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.76 Invoice 357649-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.76 Invoice 357649-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.76 Invoice 357649-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.25 Invoice 357649-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.25 Invoice 357649-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400,200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $4.88 .,voice 357649-0 .~Jash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $4.91 Invoice 357649-0 -4423- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/0210:30 .AM Page 17 Current Period: September 2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356251~0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356251-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356251-0 C~sh F'ay~-,-,ei-~ E i01-~-1410-200 O[i;c~ Supplies ...... invoice 355169-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356897-0 Cash Payment E 101.41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 101-4-2400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 602.49450-200 Office Supplies invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 101.42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 357274-0 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356885-0 Cash Payment E 601.49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356885-0 Cash Payment E 602.49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 351532-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356898-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356898-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356898-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356898-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies 356898-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356898-0 CALENDAR CALENDAR CALENDAR CREDIT-BiNDERS $1.57 $3.15 $3.15 -$41.68 APPOINTMENT BOOK' $10.41 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.98 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.98 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.98 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.98 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.98 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.99 MISCELLANEQUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.99 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.99 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.00 SCALE $6.66 AU DIO CASSETTES $47.16 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $31.17 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $62.36 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $62.36 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.92 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.92 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.92 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.92 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.92 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.31 -4424- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10:30 AM Page 18 Current Period: September 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1 Invoice 356898-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1,96 InVoice 356898-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.96 Invoice 356898-0 Transaction Date 9/'i6/2bOZ Marquette Banl~ Mou 10100 ]-oral $599.23 Refer 92402 UNIFORMS LIMITED .9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies CLOTHING, FLAIG, KEVIN $39.95 Invoice 138618 Transaction Date 9/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $39.95 Refer 92402 UNITED PROPERTIES 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95 Invoice 092402 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95 invoice 092402 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-02 BALBOA PARKING $31.95 Invoice 092402 Transaction Date 9/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.85 · Refer, 92402 US FILTER 9/24/2002 ~ash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply HYDRANT, SLEEVE, ETC $t,512.76 Invoice 8713427 PO 17480 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repatr/Maint Supply GATE VALVE $1,068.40 Invoice 8700449 PO 17499 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,581.16 Refer 92402 WIDMER, INCORPORATED 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR STORM SEWER $446.50 Invoice 5539 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract CURB STOP AND SEWER $580.00 Invoice 5541 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract CURB STOP AND SEWER $580.00 Invoice 5541 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract REPAIR AT LYNWOOD $290.00 Invoice 5542 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 09-09-02 RENTAL $200.00 Invoice 5562 Transaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,096.50 Refer 92402 XCEL ENERGY 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 08-02 #0542-505-000-244 $5,229.09 Invoice 093002 Transaction Date 9/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,229.09 Refer 92402 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 9/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts CENTERPULL WIPERS $84.11 invoice 57970204 PO 17481 .?ransaction Date 9/13/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $84.11 -4425- GITY OF MOUND Payments 09/19/02 10;30 AM Page 19 Current Period: September 2002 Fund Summary 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $46,613.77 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $14,909.66 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $2,100.09 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $163,668.79 455 TiF i-2 $/,829.?u 602 SEWER FUND $6,931.54 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $66,893.31 670 RECYCLING FUND $7,700.00 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $18,257.16 $350,159.31 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $350,159.31 $350,159.31 -4426- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff' FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP / Sarah Smith DATE: September 18, 2002 SUBJECT: Variance Request OWNER: Stephen Madsen (buyer) / Florence Worner (property owner) CASE NUMBER: 02-31 HKG FILE NUMBER: 02-05 LOCATION: 2586 Avon Drive ZONING: Residential District R-1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential At its September 16, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a request from Stephen Madsen for front yard setback variances to allow reconstruction of a new single-family dwelling at 2586 Avon Drive but on a larger footprint. The variance requested are outlined as follows: Proposed Required Variance Frontyard setback 26 ft. (Avon improved) Frontyard setback 14 ft. (Avon unimproved) 30ft. 4ft. 30ft. 16ft. PROJECT DETAILS Details regarding the variance application are contained in Planning Report No. 02-31. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the variance application as requested subject to conditions. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included as an attachment. -4427- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCES TO REBUILD THE EXISTING 1-STORY RAMBLER WITH TUCK UNDER GARAGE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2586 AVON DRIVE P & Z CASE # 02-31 WHEREAS, the applicant, Stephan Madsen, has requested the following variances to rebuild the existing 1-story rambler located at 2586 Avon Drive: Front Yard Setback (Avon Drive - Improved) Front Yard Setback (Avon Drive - Unimproved) and; Proposed Required Variance 26ft. 30ft. 4ft. 14fL 30fl. 16ft. WHEREAS, the applicant has signed a Purchase Agreement to buy the home located at 2586 Avon Drive and proposes to rebuild the current rambler and tuck under garage with similar design features but on a larger footprint and improved functionality; and WHEREAS, the proposed new design would push a small portion of the southwest corner of the home within the (30) foot front setback from the improved portion of the Avon right-of-way as well as the unimproved Avon right-of-way which provides access to Seton Lake; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a R-1 Zoning District and subject to the requirements in City Code Section 350:620; and -4428- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval of the variance as recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby grant the variances as requested subject to the following condition: a) The existing shed located in the southeast comer be removed or relocated to a conforming location. 2. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 469, Hennepin County, Minnesota The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted September 24, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -4429- Excerpts from the MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 2002 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #02- 31 Variance- Stephan Madsen/Florence Worner 2586 Avon Drive Stephan Madsen has signed a Purchase Agreement to buy the home owned by Florence Womer and submitted a request for front yard setback variances as follows: Proposed Required Variance Frontyard setback (Avon improved) 26 ft. Frontyard setback (Avon unimproved) 14 fi. 30ft. 4fi. 30fi. 16ft. The applicant desires to replace the current 1 story rambler with a new home with similar design features but on a larger footprint and with better functionality. The design would push a small portion of the southwest comer of the home within the 30 feet frontyard setback improvement Avon right of way as well as the unimproved Avon fight of way which provides access to Seton Lake. Currently, the home meets the setback from the improved portion of Avon but has a non- conforming setback of 17.81 feet from the unimproved portion of Avon. All other side and lake setbacks would exceed code requirements. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Mueller, to accept staff recommendation and require removal/relocation of the shed before a certificate of occupancy is issued. Madsen (applicant) was hoping to redo the water and sewer lines going straight into the house from the street rather than as they are. Mueller is opposed to variances. Being it's an unimproved public right of way and we've been pretty relaxed when it comes to variances as long as the impact to the neighborhood is minimal. Weiland wanted to see the shed on the lot line by the lake moved to a conforming location or removed. MOTION carried unanimously -4430- PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: September 12, 2002 SUBJECT: Variance Request OWNER: Stephen Madsen (buyer) / Florence Worner (property owner) CASE NUMBER: 02-31 HKG FILE NUMBER: 02-05 LOCATION: 2586 Avon Drive ZONING: Residential District R-1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION Stephen Madsen has signed a Purchase Agreement to buy the home owned by Florence Worner which is located at 2586 Avon Drive and has submitted a request for front yard setback variances. The variance request is as follows: Proposed Required Variance Frontyard setback 26 ft. ('Avon improved) Frontyard setback 14 f. (Avon unimproved) 30ft. 4ft. 30ft. 16ft. The applicant desires to rebuild the current 1 story rambler with a tuck under garage with a new home with similar design features but on a larger footprint and with better functionality. The proposed design would push a small portion of the southwest corner of the home within the 30 feet frontyard setback improved Avon right-of-way as well as the unimproved Avon right-of-way which provides access to Seton Lake. Currently, the home meets the setback from the improved portion of Avon but has a nonconforming setback of 17.81 feet from the unimproved portion of Avon. All other side and lake setbacks would exceed code requirements. Property hardcover would be under maximum the maximum allowable and the lowest floor elevation of 941.36 feet would exceed the minimum flood elevation standard of 933.0 feet. 123 No,Ih Third Street, Suite 100, Mimueapolis, Minnesota 5540 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -4431 - p. 2 #02-31 Madsen / Worner Variance September 12, 2002 The improved Avon street right-of-way line does not parallel the street as it might typically be platted. Rather, the right-of-way provides a much larger boulevard prior to connecting with the segment that extends to Seton Lake. This unimproved section is also wider than most "fire lanes" or other public access ways at 40 feet. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Copies of the variance application were forwarded to all City departments for review. All written comments which were received are outlined below: Parks Department: Engineering Department: The City controls Avon Drive as it extends to the lake. There is a dock site on the property which participates in the City Dock Program. Refer to memorandum from City Engineer John Cameron which has been included as an attachment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve the front yard variances as requested. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Mim~eapolis, Mimaesota 55401 74432'0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 City of Mound' VARIANCE APPLICATION ,, , Application Fee: $200.00 Planning Commission Date ~>~pT' ~ 7'h ~ Case No. ~ ~ ~ DNR PARKS Public Works ~-'~.'~" Other RECEIVED AUG ~ 1 2002 MOUND PLANNING & INSP. City Planner City Engineer Please type or print legibly PROPERTY DESC. SubdiviSion ................................................................................................ OWNER Phone (H) ~ - R~--~ )~) (M) (IF OTHER Has an application, ever been made for zoning, variance, Conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No ( l,,)¢]f yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Variance Application Page 1 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): -4433- Case No. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ~ No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, ~o[ area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCF:: (or existing) Front Yard: (NSF_~ ~ ft. ~. ~::) ft. /'"/ ft. Side Yard: (~S E W) ~;~ ft. 9.~'~' ff. 0 ft. Side Yard: (N~ w ) /O ft. 17.9 ) ft. O ft. Rear Yard: ( N S~A/) ~ ft. ¢...'~", ~ ft. <~ ft. Lakeside: (N ,,~W) ~ ft. ¢~.~'- ff. O ft. ......................................... · 7--(R-S-EW-7 ................................... E ....................................... E ..................................... ~: ..................... Street Frontage: ~::20 ft. ~Ot ft. ~ fl. Lot Size: ~sqff ~sqff O _sqff q. ~:~ ~sqff ~,,~sqff ~ sqfl 4. Does the prese~use of the propeAy conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is If no, specify each non-conforming use: located? Yes ~), No (). 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? (X) too narrow too small too shallow Please describe: ~,¥/'_57//j Fo LLArZ,F_. //o~,s£ ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) shape (',/~other: specify Vadance ApplicatiOnpage 2 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4434- Case No. /~' 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~. If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?~'i' Yes (), No t~. If yes, explain: .8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property des?ibeFl in this petition? Yes (), No {~). If no, list some other pr.operties which are similarly aff~ected~.~/..~_. 6oo ..... I ce~i~ that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submi~ed herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the ent~ in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized o~cial W the Ci~ of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature Appli,cant's Signature. _~.~ Vadance Application Page 3 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4435- Date Date CiTY Of MOUND HAP. DCOVEE CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTYADDESS: ~~ "1,.) - -- ....... = ........... -~"'-P-"'~ .... ~ ...... ~"~'"~' .............................................. OWNERS NAME: ~Q,J Otu~J%?..~CT 15~--~.~ LOT AREA SQ. ~. X 30% = (for all lots) ....................................... [ LOT AREA l ~ ~ ~ SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Re,rd) ............ · .............. ,.. [ LOT AREA SQ. ~. X 15% = (for de~ched buildings only) .................. [ ] * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques am utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. HOUSE DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT /I x 7.._ = X = TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... DRIVEWAY, PARKING EtC. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ /'/~ "~. O ~ DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover. X = X = TOTAL DECK ....................................................... TOTAL OTHER .................................................... · OT*~.^.~COWR/~.P~RWOUSSUR~^C~ ................................................... t ~17 %"~17~'-- UNDER / OVER (indicate differen/ce) ............................. ,..~~ ~2~Z_ L,),Ub~'?_~ P REPAREDBY ~/~/ ~F~~'~ DATE ~b [~[,~0~ Revlsed 03/20/02 436- -4437- Side 2~ ~86 Avon Dr, Mound Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" West/Street Side 4'8 '. 6'3 ~ '" PANTRY II 4'5 x 3'10 ~ IiI KITCHEN 149 x 1~2 ~ CL~ ,,,, ~x4~ DINING LAUNDRY 7'4 , MASTER BATH / 13'I ¥ 14~6 Walk-in-Closet 7'4 x 10'8 LIVING AREA 2966sq fl East / Lake Side -4438' Foundation Plan West / Street Side Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 11' Proposed Heated Tuck-Under Garage L~z- L/ I -- Existing Mechanical Room Existing Ba~h 2.~2 East/Lake Side Side -4439- -4440- MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 TO: SARAH SMITH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: MADSEN VARIANCE 2586 AVON DRIVE CASE NO. 02-31 1VIFRA File No. 13972 FRA As requested, we reviewed the subject variance request and have the following comments and recommendations: The portion of Avon Drive adjacent to the south property line is unimproved, except for a combination driveway, that serves both this property and 5001 Avon Dr., the property to the southwest. This right of way also contains a City storm sewer line that discharges at the lake. It appears that most of the run off from the south end of the existing structure and the new addition will drain towards the lake by way of the Avon R/W. Some runoff may drain down the driveway and reach a catch basin located in the blacktop driveway. Drainage should not be an issue; however it should be reviewed further when the building permit is requested 3. Other issues, such as the utility services, can be addressed by Public Works at the time a building permit is requested. 15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 -4441 - JCAMERON@MFRA.COM (763)476-6010 FAX (763) 476-8532 -4442- ~ -4443-,~ ' -4444- -4445- -4446- 0 o O O o _ 9,s-z.- '3~'z9:--07_. :s~.. i Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 Hennepin County, lVlN Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database i,~ updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Search By: HOUSE or BUILDING #: STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters) ..................... UNIT # (if applicable) i' ~ records per page Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax Statement ¥~..~ :.,.~. ~ :;;':': .¥~.~.;~ . ~..,~ i;':: ..'r:., ~., ~¢~ ,-~ ~",.,*~:/~. , ~':~ ..... ~' ~' '~'"' ::l ......... ~ ........... ~:: ~' ~ ~:'~ ............ ' ........ ~ '~ ... ................... s>>>:~ . .:..>:.:. · ... · · ..:.-..... · .-...., ~: ........ ~...~:..~...~.¢ ....... ;.: 24-117-24-11-0005 2586 AVON DR MOUND 277 Construction year: 1950 3 Parcel Size: IRREGUL/ FLORENCE L WORNER FLORENCE L WORNER 2586 AVON DR MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate ValUe and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 0469 TRACT A Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $256,000 $199,500 $199,500 $2,451.32 $38.02 $2,489.34 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresul'- 4447- 9/11/2002 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 2 of 2 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Values: Land Market $163,000 Building Market $93,000 Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $256,000 $127,000 $72,500 $199,500 RESIDENTIAL LAKE SHORE HOMESTEAD 11983 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to co Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati, Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County -4448- http ://www2. co. hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresul [.o o~ 9/l l/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 09/04/2002 at 1:00:00 PM Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder(~.co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3,02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http://wwwl 9.co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrim~_ 4~9-me=Hennepin&Cmd=ZOOMOUT.-. 9/11/2002 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3'190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 18, 2002 SUBJECT: Variance Request OWNER/APPLICANT: Mark Reckinger PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-32 LOCATION: 4841 Island View Drive PID: 25-117-24-11-0035 ZONING: Residential District R- 1A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY At its September 16, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance request(s) from Mark Reckinger to allow construction of a new 26' x 24' foot side-loaded detached garage at 4841 Island View Drive. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing single-stall garage and attached carport and construct a new garage in approximately the same location. The requested variance(s) are outlined below: Existim, Proposed Required Variance Front setback (north) Side setback (west) 7.5 FT 3.75 FT 8.0 FT 4.25 FT 8.0 FT 2.7 FT 4.0 FT 1.3 FT PROJECT DETAILS Details regarding the variance application are contained in Planning Report No. 02-32. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the variance application as requested subject to conditions. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included as an attachment. -4450- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION It is anticipated that the City Engineer will provided comment at the 9/24 City Council meeting with regard to the amount of easement necessary to accommodate the sanitary sewer line and manhole. As the City Council may be aware, this information was requested by the Planning Commission. -4451 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE AT 4841 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE LOTS I & 2, BLOCK 14, DEVON, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA P & Z CASE # 02-32 WHEREAS, Mark Reckinger, the applicant, has requested the following variances to allow construction of a new detached garage at 4841 Island View Drive: Existing Proposed Required Variance Front setback (north) Side setback (west) 7.5 FT 3.75 FT 8.0 FT 4.25 FT 8.0 FT 2.7 FT 4.0 FT 1.3 FT ;and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-lA Zoning District that requires a 6,000 square foot lot area and eight (8) foot front and four (4) foot side setbacks for side-loaded detached accessory dwellings and 40 percent hardcover for lots of record; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a demolish an existing 1-car garage with attached carport that is currently non-conforming due to a deficient front setback and construct a 26' x 24' detached garage that would be located 3.75 feet from the front property line abutting Island View Drive and 2.7 feet from the west property line; and WHEREAS, the topography significantly slopes off immediately behind the existing garage; and -4452- Excerpts from the MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 2002 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #02- 32 Variance - Mark Reckinger 4841 Island View Drive The applicant submitted a variance request to allow construction of new 26 ft x 24 ft side-loaded detached garage with setbacks as outlined below: Proposed Required Variance Frontyard setback (north) Side setback (west) 7.5 ft. 3.75 ft. 8.0 ft. 4.25 ft. 8.0 ft. 2.7 ft. 4.0 ft. 1.3 ft. The subject property includes an existing 1-V2 story, single-family dwelling which fronts Island View Drive to north and Devon Commons to the south. The existing house currently is non- conforming due to a deficient rear and side yard setback. These issues are deemed to be existing conditions and are not affected by the current proposal. The existing single-stall garage with attached carport is located on the west side of the lot and is also non-conforming due to a deficient front yard setback and is to be demolished as part of the current proposal. Cameron indicated that he would meet with Greg Skinner before the case goes to the City Council to determine the width required for the utility easement. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Brown, to accept staff recommendation without condition #3 in the staff report. MOTION carried unanimously -4453- WltEREAS, there is an existing sanitary sewer easement which cuts through the property; and, WttEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval of the variance(s) request subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the variance as requested subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved fees associated with the variance request. b. The final grading and drainage plan must meet the approval of the City Engineer. c. The City easement for the sanitary sewer line should be extended to include the existing manhole. 2. This variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Lots 1 and 2, Block 14, Devon, Hennepin County, Minnesota The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted September 24, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -4454- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director BATE: September 9, 2002 SUB~-ECT: Variance Request OWNER/APPLICANT: Mark Reckinger PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-32 LOCATION: 4841 Island View Drive PID: 25-117-24-11-0035 ZONING: Residential District R- 1A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND The applicant has submitted a variance(s) request to allow construction of a new 26' x 24' foot side-loaded detached garage at 4841 Island View Drive. The requested variance(s) are outlined below: Existing Proposed Required Variance Front setback (north) Side setback (west) 7.5 FT 3.75 FT 8.0 FT 4.25 FT 8.0 FT 2.7 FT 4.0 FT 1.3 FT SITE CONDITIONS The subject property includes an existing 1 ½ story, single-family dwelling which fronts Island View Drive to the north and Devon Commons to the south. The existing house currently is non- conforming due to a deficient rear and side yard setback(s). These issues are deemed to be existing conditions and are not affected by the current proposal. The existing single-stall garage with attached carport is located on the west side of the lot and is also non-conforming due to a deficient front yard setback and is to be demolished as part of the current proposal. -4455- UPDATED SURVEY An updated survey dated September 4, 2002 and hardcover calculation sheet have been prepared by the applicant. Additionally, copies of the elevation drawings for the proposed new garage have also been provided. 60-DAY PROCESS The application was received and deemed to be complete on September 4, 2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around September 13, 2002 to inform them of the variance request. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: City Engineer John Cameron The two walls of the garage that will act as retaining walls must be designed by a licensed structural engineer. The existing slope from the garage towards the house must be left undisturbed. Please also refer to the comment(s) from Greg Skinner regarding modification of the utility easement to include the City-owned manhole. Public Works Director Skinner There is a City-owned and operated sanitary sewer manhole on the subject property that is outside of the public utility easement. The easement should be extended to include this structure. Parks Director Jim Fackler No comments. Building Official Matt Simoneau No comments. Fire ChiefPederson None. -4456- Acting Police Chief McKinley No concerns from Police Department except for parking of construction vehicles and the placement of roll-off dumpsters for demolition which should be addressed by the applicant. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The subject property is bordered by Island View Drive on the north side and a (15) foot unimproved fire access lane on the east side. 2. The non-conforming side and rear yard setbacks of the principal dwelling are existing conditions. 3. The existing garage access located near the intersection of Island View Drive / Elmherst Lane / fire lane will be maintained. 4. The elevation on the subject property significantly drops off immediately behind the existing garage/carport. 5. There is an eight (8) inch sanitary sewer line and utility easement that cuts through the subject property. Construction in this area is not allowed. Use of the existing garage appears to be limited due to its size. It is anticipated that the proposed improvements will visually enhance the property and will improve the livability of the home. The most significant issue(s) about the current application is that number of non- conformities is increased as the current garage meets the minimum side yard setback of four (4) feet and the fact that it is being moved closer to Island View Drive. The Planning Commission should discuss whether or not the garage can be shiiSed and/or reduced in order to meet the side setback of four (4) feet. 8. The retaining wall(s) located on the east side of the existing house encroaches into the right-of-way. A variance for a reduced front yard setback was approved by the City Council in February 2001 which allowed construction of the new single-family dwelling located immediately west of the subject property. -4457- RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved fees associated with the variance request. 2. The final grading and drainage plan must meet the approval of the City Engineer. 3. The garage shall meet the side yard setback o£ (4) feet on the west side. 4. The City easement for the sanitary sewer line should be extended to include the existing manhole. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at either its September 24, 2002 or October 8, 2002 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at the September 16, 2002 meeting. -4458- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MARK 'RECKINGER OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 14, DEVON -~l HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA '~. ,/' - ~___.~ ....... ~...-.~; 0 TO ~ REMOVED /~ ~ . ~/ ~ ~ , ~ ~ S 89"37' 00" W 80.00 . LAKE MINNETONK~ Thi~ ~urvey intend~ to ~ho~ the b¢~ndori~ of ~he obove de~cr bed property :~¢ .:. Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: '"~i;';~.:;;~;'7;;:~ ................. ~'~'..' Ad.uress HOUSE or BUILDING #: STREET NAME: at least first 3 characters) Island View Drive UNIT # (if applicable) ~ records per page Hennepin County, I IN Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database i, updated daily (Monday -Friday) at aplJroximately 9:]5 p.m. (CST) Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax Statement 25-117-24-11~0035 4841 ISLAND VIEW DR MOUND 277 Construction year: 1930 3 Parcel Size: 80 X 101 MARK D RECKINGER MARK D RECKINGER 4841 ISLAND VIEW DR MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. Sale Date: March, 1986 Sale Price: $79,000 Transaction Type: Warranty Deed Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: DEVON Lot: Block: 014 Metes & Bounds: LOTS 1 AND 2 Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: $214,000 $205,700 $205,700 $2,539.50 $39.20 http://www2, co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresult_-' ~3,6 0- 9/9/2002 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 2 of 2 Total Tax: $2,578.70 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Values: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $188,000 $26,OOO $214,OOO $180,700 $25,000 $2o5,7oo RESIDENTIAL LAKE SHORE HOMESTEAD 3885 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to co Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati. Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http ://www2. co;h en nepi n. mn. u s/pi ns/addrresult; 4? 61 - 9/9/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hen. nepin Counl:y, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Property ID 25-117-24-11~035 Property Address 4841 ISLAND VIEW DR MOUND, MN 55364 Lastupda~:0~04/2002atl:00:00PM Approximate Property Perimeter 362 ff. Market Value Approximate Property Area 8,020 sq.ff.= 0.184 acres Total Tax (2002) $ 214,000 $ 2,578.70 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only, Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder~.co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http://wwwl9.co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrimezz~:_me=Hennepin&Cmd=ZOOMOUT... 9/9/2002 .City of Mound VARIANCE APPLICATI Planning Commission Date City Council Date ,Distdbution DN RECErVED AU6 t.9 2002 MOUND PLANNING & Application Case No. City Planner DNR City Engineer ')~ PARKS Public Works ..N- Other Please type or print legibly Fee: $200,00 .OD PAiD AUG I 9 CiTY OF MOUND SUBJECT Address... PROPER~ LEGAL Lot ~) ZOninG PROPERW Name ~ OWNER APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER Address THAN OWNER) Phone (H) 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (/~/). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Vadance Application Page 1 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4463- Case No. _ (~Z "'~ ~-' 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning distdct in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (.X). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i,e, setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED Front Yard: (~)S E W) S ~ ft. 1 Side Yard: ( N S E~ ! ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ft. REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) ,,I,, ? ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ' (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: ff. ff. ff. sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ff sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (~), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ¢/~ topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: Variance Application Page 2 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4464- Case No. (OZ-~ ~ 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of an.¥one having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~. If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No ~/)(~, If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No (~.,~. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: notices as may be required by law.,..../-" Owner's $ignaturo Applicant's Signature ~ I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such Variance Application Page 3 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4465- Oemments: I am seeking this variance for the following reasons: The proposed dimensions (24' X 26.5") of the replacement garage are the minimum required to accommodate 2 cars (my home has 2 occupants), 3 motorcycles and various woodworking and yard tools. The topography of the lot, bordering the south side of this structure, drops off very sharply. To accommodate the proposed 24 foot width, the new structure needs to be extended on the North side. This same drop off affects how far East the structure can extend. To accommodate the proposed 26.5 foot depth, the new structure needs to be extended on the West side. The existing structure is collapsing and is also of a design that is inconsistent with the structures that surround it. Replacing it will yield a significant improvement to the appearance of the neighborhood. Also, the proposed placement would align nicely, with the Two properties adjacent to mine, West of the proposed location. -4466- Building Permit Application City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 952-472-0607 Fax: 952-472-0679 SITE Property Address · Business Name~enant ~~ ~~'l ~~ ~ Applicant is: ~ Owner ~ Contractor ~ Tenant ' LEGAL Lot DESCRIPTION Subdivision PID OWNER ~ame CONT~CTOR Company Name License Con.ct Person Address Home Phone Other ARCHITECT Name AND/OR Address ENGINEER Home Phone Other VALUATION OF WORK: $ I(-~ ./C)(..~ VALUE APPROVED $ Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilating or air conditioning. Permits become null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a pedod of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. Time Limits on Buildino Comcletion. All work to be performed pursuant to a building permit obtained for new construction, repairs, remodeling, and alterations to the exteriors of any building or structure in any zoning district shall be completed within one (I) year from the date of permit issuance. The person obtaining the permit and the owner of the property shall be responsible for completion. A violation of this ordinance is a misdemeanor offense. The City Council may extend the time for completion upon written request of the permlttee, establishing to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Council that circumstances beyond the control of the permlttae prevented completion of the work for which the permit was granted. The extension shall be requested not less than thirty (30) business days pdor to the end of the one-year period. I hereby cerlJfy that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances · governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit do4ss not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulati~ ~x3nst%n ~:~,,~3e %rman? of construction, PRINT APPLICANT'S NAME AppLICANT'~ SI--GNATURE DAtE ' (OFFICE USE oNLy) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: RECEIVEP: AUG 200;) COPIED APPROVED RECEIVED BY& DATEMouND PLANNING & IN'SP. ZONING PLANS CHECKED BY CITY ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS APPROVED BY & DATE ASSESSING BUILDING OFFICIAL -4467 CITY O'F MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIoNs (IN'PERViOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) OWNER'S NAME: .s.oz. LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) I I ooo LOT AREA ' SQ: FT:"'X"40'%"-=""(fot'r6'tS LOT AREA SQ. FT, X 15% = (for detaChed bUildings only) .. I t *Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage .provided that techniques are utilized, as outlin.ed.in Z,on!ng Ord!r)a0ce Sect. ion 350. L12.25,Su,bd.:.6: B:.1. (sae back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official, HOUSE DETACHED BLDGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC, DECKS Open decke (1/4" min. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT TOTAL HOUSE TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS .................. x : ' "x .:.= ' ' TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .................. ¸ -cae Po~zT __ - coNC~E AR~¢ opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover TOTAL DECK , . .- ..................... -.d~,~ ,-r~ ~ R~,~:~,~/o,~ i~oc< d~,!; a~, OTHER 55-~L~ ~53 ~,Rxo&:Zi . = ~6~' __ x = 7D TOTAl. o'THER V TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 1 .... ~.....~ ; .,.., .~ .... ,.... ,...,....~.,., . ~ ......,_..... ,.. OVER (indicate difference.)..~ PREPARED BY ~OM B~ ( ~SSoclATg5 DATE -I~,o~oER.$ , .. co~c~¢lE WAU.5 ~ I.~RDr.~E R 6-1 I-gE -4468- Specifications of Garage: · (2X4) 16.O.C. Typical framing · 4-12 pitch hip roof with ½" sheathing · Asphalt shingles throughout and 2 rows of ice and water around the perimeter · Continuous venting iander the eves · 3-2X12 microlam header spanning 16' · 7X16 overhead door · Slab on grade foundation with 8" poured walls around the N and West walls · 36" Service door 2 Windows · P.T. wood as bottom plates · All siding will be 6" above finished grade · ½ exterior sheathing with lap siding · Aluminum soffits and facia · 4" concrete slab with 3" sand base -4469- Il;' ) 2-,.'. ~. .~: .'. ,',,' ~ ~.~ ..', · .' .... ,-. ~r -, ,: ·; . :,,.., . o, . C;:-:'~-' ~-2~:'--' -: 7' ."-~':. :' ....';,"?--1 :-"~;..-7'.' -4470- -4471 - -4472- 24' -4473- Engineering · Planning · Surveying September 18, 2002 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound West Edge Boulevard Street Improvements Partial Payment MFRA/$7827 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Buffalo Bituminous' Payment Request No. 1 for work completed through September 15, 2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $43,606.10. Also included, is Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $1,828.50 for items relating to the storm sewer construction. We have reviewed this request and change order, find them in order, and recommend approval and payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:pry Enclosure cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director, City of Mound s:~main:Wlou07827:\Correspondencekhanson9-17 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota -4474- · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-maih mfra@mfra, com W ~n Z I..U 1-- ~- ~o o < m < ~ - rt.. d -4475- o o o o~o oo O0 0 O0 0 0 o00 0000o 0 0o88888888808008088888o8o0080000088o8 ~8~ 00000 0 000 000 0 00000 0 0 0 8ooooo8o8ooo8ooo8o888ooooo8o8o8888o88o o 888 8 ddddddd~dddddddddddd~ddddddd~ddddd~d d ddd 8888888888888888888888888888888888888 888 00000 0 O0 0000 ~ O0 000 0 ooooo8o8oo8oooo8~8oo8o~o8o888888888~8 00o8808880000800000808880000888888888 000 oooooooo oo~ 00 00 00000 o oo ooo88o~oooooo8oo~8oo8~88oo0oo888o8oo > ~ ~ .- : ~ ~ = '- E ,: ~ ~ m= =~ ~.~_~ ..... :m~ ' ° W ~ 0 -4476- CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CITY OF MOUND WEST EDGE BOULEVARD Street Improvements MFRA g7827 1. 15" CMP 2. Remove & Replace 15" CM Apron 3. Granular Foundation Material TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT Quantity_ Unit 30 LF 1 EA 50 TN Unit Price $ 32.20 $ 115.00 $ 14.95 Total $ 966.00 $ 115.00 $ 747.50 $ 1,828.50 $ 211,027.75 $ 1,828.50 $ 212,856.25 APPROVED: CITY OF MOUND BY: DATE: ACCEPTED: DATE: RECOMMENDED: MFRA DATE: s:~nain:'uMou07827 :XSpecs\chan georderg 1 -4477- CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CITY OF MOUND WEST EDGE BOULEVARD Street Improvements MFRA 4/7827 1. 15" CMP 2. Remove & Replace 15" CM Apron 3. Granular Foundation Material TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT Quantity Unit 30 LF 1 EA 50 TN Unit Price $ 32.20 $ 115.00 $ 14.95 Total $ 966.00 $ 115.00 $ 747.50 $ 1,828.50 $ 211,027.75 $ 1328.50 $ 212,856.25 APPROVED: CITY OF MOUND BY: DATE: BY: . RECON[MENDED: MFRA BY: / ,~_~ DATE: ~~. s:'anain:'uM ou07827:XS pecs\changeorderg 1 -4478- CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CITY OF MOUND WEST EDGE BOULEVARD Street Improvements MFRA g7827 1. 15" CMP 2. Remove & Replace 15" CM Apron 3. Granular Foundation Material TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT Quantity Unit 30 LF 1 EA 50 TN Unit Price $ 32.20 $ 115.00 $ 14.95 Total $ 966.00 $ 115.00 $.. 747.50 $ 1,828.50 $ 211,027.75 $ 1,828.5o $ 212,856.25 APPROVED: CITY OF MOUND BY: DATE: RECOMMENDED: MFRA BY: /~/~ DATE: s:kmain:KMou07827:XSpecsXchaageorderg 1 -4479- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 17, 2002 SUBJECT: CUP Amendment APPLICANT: Dave Bortner / Mahogany Bay PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-34 LOCATION: 2642 Commerce Blvd. ZONING: Central Business District (B-l) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Linear District SUMMARY The City Council will hold a public hearing to review an application from Mahogany Bay for an conditional use permit amendment to extend the timeframe for paving of the parking lot. As the City Council is aware, the original CLIP was approved in 2000 and amended in 2001 to extend the timeframe for completion of the paving activities by October 1, 2002. Based on information provided by the applicant, the additional survey information is to be prepared on September 18, 2002 and will be delivered to the City Engineer for technical review as soon as it is completed. Members of the City Council are advised that City Engineer John Cameron will be present at the meeting to explain the site conditions including the existing drainage problem in the subject area. BACKGROUND Details and background history regarding the CUP for Mahogany Bay are contained in Planning Report No. 02-34. PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permit (and amendments) are reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350:535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the notice of public hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. Members of the City Council are advised that the notice of public hearing was published in the Laker on September 13, 2002. Additionally, the notice of public hearing was also mailed to all affected property owners located within (350) feet on or before September 13, 2002. -4480- PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW The proposed amendment to the conditional use permit for Mahogany Bay was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 16, 2002 meeting. In general, members of the Planning Commission expressed concern that the project had not been advanced. John Cameron was present at the meeting and explained the site conditions and responded to questions from the Commission including a proposed timeline for fulfillment of the condition(s). Dave Bortner of Mahogany Bay was present at the meeting and indicated that the necessary survey information has been ordered from Otto & Associates and will be made available to the City Engineer as soon as it is ready. Additionally, the applicant was encouraged to have Otto & Associates contact City Engineer John Cameron to ensure that they provide all necessary information including a proposed parking plan. Mr. Bortner assured the Planning Commission that they intend to pave the parking lot. RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve an amendment to the conditional use permit for Mahogany Bay subject to the following conditions: 1. The condition included in Resolution No. 01-95 which requires paving by October 1, 2002 be extended to May 30, 2003. A report from the City Engineer is provided to the Planning Commission within (60) days regarding the status of the parking lot and recommended improvements following receipt of the survey information to be provided by the applicant. 2 -4481 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT WHICH ALLOWS OPERATION OF MAHOGANY BAY AT 2642 COMMERCE BOULEVARD P & Z CASE # 02-34 PID # 22-112-21-14-0008 WHEREAS, the applicant, Dave Bortner of Mahogany Bay, has submitted a request to amend the conditional use permit which was approved on August 8, 2000 which allows operation of Mahogany Bay, a boat and marine sales and merchandise business located at 2642 Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the conditional use permit issued on August 8, 2002 was approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Require all sales or storage of any merchandise to be located within the building and outside display or storage of any boats to be limited to 72 hours. 2. The parking lot be paved to city standards within 18 months of the approval of the resolution. 3. Recognize a hardcover variance of 60% is granted. 4. Recognize a building setback variance of 45 feet from the residential district. ; and WHEREAS, the conditional use permit was amended on October 23,2001 and the timeframe for completion of paving activities was extended until October 1, 2002; and -4482- WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an extension that requires paving of the parking lot by October 1, 2002 due to an existing multi-party drainage problem in and around the subject property; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has verified that there are existing site drainage problems associated with the subject site and adjacent areas; and WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated that the additional survey work which has been requested by the City Engineer will be prepared on September 18, 2002; and WltEREAS, the applicant has indicated that he intends to pave the parking lot following resolution of the surface drainage problem; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its September 16, 2002 meeting and recommended approval of the conditional use permit amendment subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the conditional use permit amendment with the following conditions: a. The condition included in Resolution No. 01-95 which requires paving by October 1, 2002 be extended to May 30, 2003. A report from the City Engineer is provided to the Planning Commission within (60) days regarding the status of the parking lot and recommended improvements following receipt of the survey information to be provided by the applicant. This conditional use permit is approved for the following legally described property: See Exhibit A The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: -4483- Adopted September 24, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -4484- Excerpts from the MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 2002 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #02- 34 CUP Amendment - Dave Bortner/Mahogany Bay 2642 Commerce Boulevard City staff indicated that we needed to have additional survey work to compliment the existing survey work. There hasn't been any additional survey work done since last discussed by Planning Commission. Brown - They've had a year to accomplish the paving requirement and it's not done. Mueller - We were assured by Warner that it would be done. On August 30th, 2002 they ordered what was required a year ago. Cameron was not convinced at that time that it would be accomplished. He pointed out the culvert that needs to be replaced because of condition and elevation difficulties. One of the problems is that the road right of way is being used as parking lot and there is no definition between the areas. Options: The property owner could ask to have part of the county road right of way vacated depending on what Hennepin County wanted for right of way. The City would have to retain easements for storm sewer. The property owner could design the parking lot to take advantage of the area west of the current parking lot if it could be established; 1) who owns the property in question; and 2) how much right of way does Hennepin County require. Commission members wanted to know why we haven't received the topography yet? Bortner was unclear why. The surveyor will be there on Wednesday morning to do it. Weiland asked Cameron what his requests would be. Cameron wanted a topographic survey and a design that works. Brown would be in favor of granting them a 2 month extension. Mueller is against an extension in the first place but a 2 month would be acceptable. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Brown, to allow an extension for the paving until May 30th of next year and a review of the survey and plan with City engineering staff not more than 60 days from now. MOTION carded unanimously. -4485- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55564 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 11, 2002 SUBJECT: CUP Amendment APPLICANT: Dave Bortner / Mahogany Bay PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-34 LOCATION: 2642 Commerce Blvd. ZONING: Central Business District (B-1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Linear District REQUEST The applicant, Dave Bortner (on behalf of Mahogany Bay), has submitted an application for an amendment to the conditional use permit which was issued on August 8, 2000 and amended on October 23,2001 to request an extension regarding the condition which requires paving until such time as the multi-party drainage problem can be effectively resolved. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed land use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the conditional use permit review criteria are contained in City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 1. PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permit (and amenchnents) are reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350:535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the notice of public hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the notice of public hearing was published in the Laker on September 13, 2002. Additionally, the notice of public hearing was also mailed to all affected property owners located within (350) feet on or before September 13, 2002. -4486- GENERAL COMMENTS Representatives of Hennepin County, the City of Mound, and the property owner met on the subject site on several occasions to discuss the site conditions. In order to properly address the drainage problem, additional survey information is necessary including topography and location of the City/County public right-of-way boundaries. It is City staff's understanding that the survey has been ordered and is to be prepared on or around September 18, 2002 by Otto & Associates. Until that information is received, it is unknown what the solution is with regard to the drainage or whether or not the parking lot can be designed to function properly in the limited space available or even if it can be paved. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the City Engineer will be present at the meeting to specifically explain the existing site conditions and drainage problems in this area(s) as it is a fairly complex issue. The Planning Commission may wish to discuss the removal of the paving condition altogether if it is determined by the City Engineer that it cannot be accomplished due to existing site conditions. RECOMMENDATION Staff' recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the amendment to the conditional use permit for Mahogany Bay subject to the following conditions: 1. The condition included in Resolution No. 01-95 which requires paving by October 1, 2002 be extended. Following receipt of the updated survey and preparation of a parking plan, a follow-up meeting with all involved parties including, but not limited to, the applicant, the adjacent property owner(s), Hennepin County and the City of Mound, shall be held to discuss resolution of the matter. 3. The paving condition shall be eliminated if it is determined by the City Engineer that it cannot be accomplished due to existing site conditions. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the public hearing for review of the CLIP amendment request from Mahogany Bay is scheduled to be held by the City Council at its September 24, 2002 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at its September 16, 2002 meeting. -4487- F.T~ W~'s September 9, 2002 Sarah Smith City of Mound, Planning and Building Department 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Sarah, This letter is to paving are aware we can proceed withPaving. Further will require input and help from Mahogany Bay. The next step in this process. survey of the property surVey, and Obviously, glvel an update on our progress our conditional use permit for 2642 e issues and concerns that require res( pe )perry. time let me kn( a copy of the urvey, and rmatio~ .~ perm: g else we need to address at app] lot As you ~efore an( on our >n. Please Sincerely, ff/~// . ~' Mahogany Bay Enclosures (2) Commerce Boulevard Mound, Minnesota 55364 www.mahoganybay.net 952.495.0007 Phone 952.495.1237 Fax -4488- SSOCIATES Engineers & Land Surveyors,/nc. Name Mahogany Bay Attn: Dave Bortner Address 2642 Commerce Blvd. City Mound State MN Phone - W 952-495-0007 H F M Description of Work Ordered: Zip 55364 Job No 1-02-0457 Date Ordered 08-30-02 Date Promised RefBy Co. Name Address City State Phone Plat: Section: Remarks: Township: Range: County: Hennepin Cost Estimate: $1,400.00 This estimate is only for the work outlined above. Any additional work will be billed according to our hourly rate schedule. This schedule is as follows: · OFFICE: Principal ........................................................................................ $95.00/hour Senior Registered Engineer/Surveyor ....................... ' ...................... $90.00/hour Registered Engineer/Surveyor ....................................................... $81.00/hour Engineer (E.I.T.); Surveyor (L.S.I.T.) ........................................... $76.00/hour Senior Technician ............................... i .......................................... $68.00/hour Teclmician, Level III ..................................................................... $60.00/hour Technician, Level II ....................................................................... $50.00/hour Technician, Level I ........................................................................ $45.00/hour Word Processor ............................................................................. $35.00/hour Clerical .......................................................................................... $27.00/hour FIELD: Construction Observer .................................................. ' ................. $60.00/hour 3-Person Survey Crew ................................................................... $135.00/hour 2-Person Survey Crew .......................................................... } ....... : $110.00/hour (Please see reverse side and sign on authorization line.) 9 WEST DIVISION STREET - BUFFALO, MN 55313 · (763) 682-4727 · FAX (763) 682-3522 -4489- PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Persons or companies furnishing labor or materials for the improvement of real property may enforce a lien upon the land if they are not paid for their contributions, even if such parties have no direct contractual relationship with the owner. Minnesota law permits the owner to v, fthhold fi-om his comractor so much of the contract price as may be necessary to me~t the demands of all other lien claimants, pay directly such liens and deduct the cost thereof fi'om the contract price, or withhold amounts from his contractor until the expiration of 120 days from the completion of such improvement unless the contractor furnishes to the owner waivers of claims for mechanic's lien signed by persons who furnish any labor or materials for the improvement and who provided the owner with timely notice. THIS AUTHORIZATION IS TO CONFIRM THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE TO PROCEED AND ALSO AS TO THE SCOPE OF OUR SERVICES. IF THIS IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED, PIJI~.ASE CONTACT OUR OFFICES IMMEDIATELY AS WORK ON THIS PROJECT HAS ALREADY BEGUN! WHETHER YOU SIGN THIS FORM OR NOT W/LL NOT CHANGE YOUR OBLIGATION TO PAY US'FOR THE WORK WE HAVE DONE ON YOUR PROJECT TO DATE BASED UPON OTHER COMMITMENTS EITHER VERBAL OR OTIJE/~SE. v Cl~nt Name (Pei-~Sr/responsib!e~ for payment) Otto Associates, In~. Are you the. owner of the proPe~y to be worked out? (ckc!e one) YES NO If you are not the owner, please provide the owner's name and address below: -4490- City of Mound CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Conditional Use Permit Fee: $350.00 + Escrow Deposit Iity PlanneQJ~r:. ity Engineer: Public Works: Fire Dept. Parks: Other: Please type or printthe followln informatim INFORMATION - -- LEGAL Lot DESCRIPTION Bilk Plat Subdivision APPLICANT The applicant Is: Owner ~ Other: Name OWUE~ (If ether than Address applicant) Phone ~) , OR ZONING CirCe: R-~ R-lA R-2 R-3 B-2 B-3 DtS~ICT Revised 06/27/02 -4491 - 09/09/2002 14 52 FAX 9524720620 Condibbnal Use Permit ApplicaEon Page 2 EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. If applicable, a development schedute shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ,~yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. pp 7cation rnus! belsi~ned by.~ owners of~~ prop~y, or an explanation given why this is not the pp c~ Signature Date ~ Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date City Code Section 350:525 relating to Conditional Use Permits J]:~-tJ~LE.tLYjLe~y¢~ by the applicant. If applying for a two family dwelling, City Code Section 350:630, Subd. 4. ~ [e_YJ.e._.~e~ by the applicant. Revised 06/27/02 -4492- CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF H.ENNEPI.N) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and the Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1. As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which the attached and forgoing e ,xt~act. was transcribed. 2. I have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. I find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the odginal minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held of the date indicted in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 01-95 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT WHICH ALLOWS OPERATION OF MAHOGANY BAY AT 2642 COMMERCE BOULEVARD P & Z CASE #01-40 PID #22-112-21-14-0008 Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on October 23, 2001. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 24th day of October, 2001. Acti,ng City Clerk -4493- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 01-95 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT WHICH ALLOWS OPERATION OF MAHOGANY BAY AT 2642 COMMERCE BOULEVARD P & Z CASE # 01-40 PID # 22-112-21-14-0008 WHEREAS, the applicant, F. Todd Warner, has submitted a request to amend the conditional use permit which was approved on August 8, 2000 to allow operation of Mahogany Bay, a boat and marine sales and merchandise business located at 2642 Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the c~:nditional use permit which was previously approved was made subject to the following conditions: 1. Require all sales or storage of any merchandise to be located within the building and outside dj.splay or storage of any boats to be limited to 72 hours. 2. The parking lot be paved to City standards within 18 months of the approval ~the resolution. 3. Recognize a hardcover varian~ of 60% is granted. 4. Recognize a building setback variance of 45 feet from the residential distri~. ;and WHEREAS, the properly is zoned B-1 Central Business District and allows boat sales as a conditional use; and -4494- Resold;ion No. 01-95 WHEREAS, the current business operations at Mahogany Bay includes sales and display of classic wooden boats and accessories; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested that Condition # 2 which requires paving of the parking lot to City standards within 18 months be removed due to an existing multi-party drainage problem in and around the subject property; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has vedfied that there existing site drainage problems associated with the subject site and adjacent areas; and WHEREAS, applicant has indicated that he intends to pave the parking lot following resolutier~ ef the surface drainage problem; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 15, 2001 regarding the request and recommended approval of the conditional use permit amendment as recommended by staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby grant the conditional use permit with the following conditions: a) The request shall be made Subject to any forthcoming comments from City staff or Hennepin County. b) The condition which requires paving within 18 months following approval of Resolution 00-74 be emended until October 1, 2002. c) A meeting with all involved parties including, but not limited to, the applicant, the adjacent property owner(s), Hennepin County and the City ef Mound be set up te discuss resolution of the drainage problem including payment thereof. This conditional use permit is approved for the following legalty des~ibed .property: See Exhibit A The foregei,ng resolution was moved by Councilmember Hanus and seconded by Councilmember Brown. -4495- Resolution No. 01-~. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Anderson and Meyer. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: None. Adopted by the City Council t:his 23rd day of October, 2001. Meisel, SS/Bonnie Ritte,r Attest.: Bonnie Ritter, Acting City Clerk SS/Pat Meisel Mayor Pat Meisel -4496- Resolution No. 01-95 EXHIBIT A Legal' Description - Mahogany Bay That part of Government Lot 1, Section 23, Township 117, Range 24, described as commencing at a point on the Sou{.her~,y Ii.ne of' Chapman Place, (now Bartlett Boulevard) as dedicated in the plat of Mound Bay Park, distant 100 feet Easterly along said Southerly line from the Easterly line of Lake Avenue (now Commerce Boulevard) as dedicated in said plat of Mound Bay Park; thence Southerly pa,rallel with the EasterlY line of said Commerce Boulevard, a distance of 100 feet, to the actual point of beginning: thenca continue southerly along said parallel li~e, a distance ef 1-00.00 feet: thence Westerly parallel with the Southerly line of said Ba,Kieff Boulevard a distance of 100 feet to the Easterly line of said Commerce Boulevard: thenCe Northerly along aid Easterly line, a distance' of 100 feet: thence Easterly parallel with said southerly line to the point of beginning. -4497- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 11, 2001 SUBJECT: CUP Amendment APPLICANT: Todd Warner / Mahogany Bay PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 01-40 LOCATION: 2642 Commerce Blvd. ZONING: Central Business District (B-1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Linear District REQUEST The applicant, Todd Warner, has submitted an application for an amendment to the conditional use permit which was issued on August 8, 2000 for the Mahogony Bay project to request that the condition which required that the parking lot be paved within (18) months upon adoption of Resolution # 00-74 be removed due to a multi-party drainage problem. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that specific details regarding the existing site conditions and drainage problems in and around the subject area are specifically addressed in the memorandum that has been prepared by the City Engineer and included as an attachment. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed land use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the conditional use permit review criteria are contained in City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 1. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permit requests (and amendments) are reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350:535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a public heating is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on all requests for conditional use permits and further requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. -4498- Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Laker on October 6, 2001. Additionally, the Notice of Public Hearing was also mailed to all affected property owners located within (350) feet on October 4, 2001. As of October 11,2001, no comments regarding the request have been received. 60-DAY PROCESS The request from Todd Warner was received and deemed to be complete on September 4, 2001. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been included in the have been included in the Planning Report as attachment(s.) The Planning Commission is advised that the Police Department and Parks Department have indicated that they have no comments regarding the request. Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner has indicated that the applicant will need to provide a two-week notice to the City prior to the commencement of paving activities so that the storm drain located in the southern driveway can be repaired. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMENT Copies of the request and all supporting materials were also forwarded to Hennepin County for review and comment. GENERAL COMMENTS Based upon a site visit conducted by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and myself on or around September 1, 2001, it appears that the parking lot at Mahogany Bay cannot be paved prior to the resolution of the existing drainage problem. The applicant has indicated that he wants to pave the parking area however he is reluctant to do so until the drainage problem can be resolved cooperatively by all involved parties. As an alternative to removal of the paving condition from the CUP, City staff would suggest that an extension be considered to allow adequate time for the drainage and/or infrastructure issues to be satisfactorily resolved. -4499- RECOMMENDATION Staff' recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the amendment to the conditional use permit for Mahogany Bay subject to the following conditions: 1. The request shall be made subject to any forthcoming comments from City staff or Hennepin County. 2. The condition which requires paving within (18) months from the approval of Resolution 00-74 be extended an additional (18) months. A meeting with all involved parties including, but not limited to, the applicant, the adjacent property owner(s), Hennepin County and the City of Mound be set up to discuss resolution of the drainage problem including payment thereof. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the public hearing for review of the CUP amendment request from Todd Warner is scheduled to be held by the City Council at its Tuesday, October 23, 2001 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at its October 15, 2001 meeting. -4500- MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 4, 2001 Sarah Smith, Community Development Director John Cameron, City Engineer Mahogany Bay CLIP 2642 Commerce Boulevard MFRA #13495 Our site visit to subject property reconfirmed my opinion regarding the requkement that this parking lot be paved within 18 months of the approval of the CLIP. The first problem is that the deadline date of February 8, 2002 is impossible to meet unless the lot is paved immediately. As I mentioned before, I thought this condition was agreed to by Mr. Warner without any plan or much thought about solving the drainage issues in this area. The entire area of the business to the north (R & R Bait Shop) which is gravel surface, drains across Mr. Wamer's property. The problem is complicated by additional runoff coming from the County and City right-of-ways. The water is intended to drain under the Mahogany Bay driveway by what appears to be an undersized culvert and then in a ditch to the City' s storm sewer system which runs along the Commerce Place complex and discharges into the lake. The Mahogany Bay building and parking lot are below street level and present a very difficult drainage situation to try and resolve. I'm not suggesting that the condition requking the parking lot to be paved should be eliminated; however, possibly a 6 month or even another 18 month extension is in order to provide sufficient time for the applicant, with help from the City and the County, to resolve the matter. s:~naln:~mou 13495~correspondence~smith9 -26 -4501 - MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY OCTOBER 15, 2001 Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Michael Mueller, Orvin Burma, Becky Glister, Frank Weiland, Cklair Hasse, and Council Liaison Kim Anderson. Absent and excused: Jerry Clapsaddle. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Recording Secretary Jill Norlander. The following Public were present: Andy Anderson F. Todd Warner Tom Reese 3001 Brighton Boulevard 2642 Commerce Boulevard 5641 Bartlett Boulevard Chairman Michael welcomed the public to the meeting. He then called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 1. APPROVE MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION by Hasse, seconded by Weiland, to approve the minutes of the October 1, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING CASE #01-40 Mahogany Bay Conditional Use Permit 2642 Commerce Boulevard F. Todd Warner The applicant, Todd Warner, has submitted an application for an amendment to the conditional use permit which was issued on August 8, 2000 for the Mahogany Bay project to request that the condition which required that the parking lot be paved within (18) months upon adoption of Resolution #00-74 be removed due to a multi-party drainage problem. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that specific details regarding the existing site conditions and drainage problems in and around the subject area are specifically addressed in the memorandum that has been prepared by the City Engineer and included as an attachment. Based upon a site visit conducted by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and myself on or around September 1, 2001, it appears that the parking lot at Mahogany Bay cannot be paved prior to the resolution of the existing drainage problem. The applicant has indicated that he wants to pave the parking area however he is reluctant to do so until the drainage problem can be resolved cooperatively by all involved parties. -4502- Planning Commission Minutes October 15, 2001 As an alternative to removal of the paving condition from the CLIP, City staff Would suggest that an extension be considered to allow adequate time for the drainage and/or infrastructure issues to be satisfactorily resolved. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the amendment to the conditional use permit for Mahogany Bay subject to the following conditions: 1. The request shall be made subject to any forthcoming comments from City staffor Hennepin County. 2. The condition which requires paving with (18) months from the approval of Resolution 00-74 be extended an additional (18) months. 3. A meeting with all involved parties including, but not limited to, the applicant, the adjacent property owner(s), Hennepin County and the City of Mound be set up to discuss resolution of the drainage problem, including payment thereof. Discussion Burma asked if Smith had any inkling from the Engineer about a solution at this time. Smith indicated that engineering data needs to be presented by applicant and adjacent property owner so an evaluation can be made. Development in the area needs to be considered. Burma asked if the solution should be available within 6 months. Smith said it should be. Mueller wanted to know why we should think that anything will be done in the next 12 months when nothing was accomplished in the previous 12 months. The applicant, Todd Warner, said that having been in the building and dealing with the issues first hand has clarified many of the issues. He has a hard time paving his property while his neighbor isn't required to pave his. People use the driveway area as a cut through from Bartlett to the parking lot. He is willing to pay his share and be involved in the process but not bear the whole brunt of the expense. Mueller inquired whether the pond was low enough to accept water from the property without being mn through the culvert. Warner thought it was not. Other issues such as safety need to be considered. Weiland doesn't think Warner should be responsible for dealing with all the water because water from Kirby's, Bartlett Boulevard and Commerce Boulevard drains through Wamer's property. Mueller queried where the City's responsibility lies for the analysis of the water mn off from a county road. Smith indicated that we need to go through the city channels so groundwork is laid to go to the county. City Engineer Cameron, in a previous conversation, said that the county looks for preliminary engineering data from the applicant. She further clarified that, usually, once data is in, (in this case, spot elevations and elevations of the building comers) we sit down with the property owners and assign a percentage of the responsibility to each. After a discussion about the meeting when the CLIP was originally granted, Michael wanted to know why the drainage issue was being brought up now if it was such a big issue back then. Warner replied that he didn't come away from that meeting with the realization of how big an issue it really was. 2 -4503- Planning Commission Minutes October 15, 2001 Chair Michael opens the public hearing. Tom Reese, 5641 Bartlett Boulevard - Mr. Reese said he was here 13 months ago and brought up the drainage issue at that time. He requested that the time limit not be removed totally. This is the entrance to our city. It's an eyesore and a danger. We need to make it safe. That property has had a drainage issue for years. He feels that the problem was probably factor into the building price. Don't let this fester another 18 months. Solve it. Chair Michael closed the public heating. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Burma, to recommend allowing an extension to the Conditional Use Permit for completion of the paving issue to October 1, 2002. Weiland wanted to know if the city accomplish their portion of the work within that time frame. Smith thought so. Burma offered, as an explanation for his second, indicated that because we are in the 15th month of the time limit, there would not be enough for it to be resolved if the extension wasn't granted. MOTION carried. Michael voting against. -4504- August 8, 2000 RESOLUTION # 00-74 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCF~ FOR 2642 COMlVlERCE BLVD. FOR THE PURPOSES OF A BOAT AND MARINE SALES AND MERCHANDISE BUSINESS UPPLOTTED LAND PID # 23-112-21 14 0008 P & Z CASE # 00-38 Wl~.REAS, F. Todd Warner, applicant, has submitted a request for a conditional use permit to operate boat and marine sales and merchandise business in the property located at 2642 Commerce Blvd., and; WHEREAS, the property is z6ned B-1 Central Business District and allows boat sales as a conditional use, and; WHEREAS, the property encompasses approximately 10,000 square feet and has about 90 percent existing hardcover, and; WttEREAS, the applicant intends to use the property as it is with no building or site modifications, and; WI~REAS, the business would operate as a display and sales of classic wooden boats and accesories, and; WttEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval of the conditional use permit as recommended by staff; and, NOW, TmZ~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City.does hereby grant a conditional use permit and associated variances with the following conditions: Require all sales or storage of any merchandise be located within the building and outside display or storage of any boats to be limited to 72 hours. The parking lot be paved to city standards within 18 months of the approval of this resolution. Recognize a hardcover variance of 60 % is granted. Recognize a building setback variance of 45 feet from the residential district. ........... ..................................... -4505-, ........ · This Conditional use'permit is granted for the following new legally descfib~ property: ,.: The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costS, for such recording. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Brown and seconded by Councilmember Weycker. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Ahrens, Brown Hanus and Weycker. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Meisel were absent and excused. SS/MARK HANUS Acting Mayor At~s~ -Cit~ ~lerk - ' .. ............... ............. ............. -4506-~ ........... .................................................................. August 12,2002 ToddWarner Mahogany Bay 2642 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 -COPY- RE: Conditional Use Permit Amendment - October 2001 Approval Dear Mr. Warner: This letter is in regard to the conditional use permit amendment which was approved by the City Council on October 23, 2001 subject to conditions including paving of the parking lot by October 1, 2002 and resolution of the drainage problem by all involved parties. On behalf of the City of Mound, I would like to respectfully request an update regarding this matter. It is City staff's understanding that you were going to provide some additional survey information including elevations and topography of the subject site and also include those portions of the City and County right-of-way that would be affected by the paving and drainage corrections. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience at 952-472-3190. Sincerely, Sarah J. Smith Community Development Director SJS -4507- (20) (33) BLVD ~0 ~ 25) 5 (16) 52 -4508- l~mnd City Code 350.525 350.525 Conditional Use Permits. Subd. 1. Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits. In granting a conditional use permit, the Mound City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Among other things, the City Council may make the following findings where applicable. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other, necessary facilities have been or are being provided. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed, use. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. .6. ;~he use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the propesed use. H. The use is not in conflict with the policy plan of the City. 41 215100 -4509- Mound City Code 350.525, Subd. 1, I. Ke The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. Existing adjacent uses will not be adversely affected because of curtailment of customer trade brought about by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. That all property taxes, special assessments, municipal utility fees, including but not limited to water and sewer bills, and penalties and interest thereon have been paid for the property for which the permit has been submitted. (ORD. 105-2000, 2/5/00) Subd. 2. Additional Conditions - Conditional Use Permits. In permitting a new conditional use or the alteration of an existing conditional use, the City Council may impose, in addition to those standards and requirements expressly specified by this Ordinance, additional conditions which the City Council considers necessary to protect the best interest of the surrounding area or the community as a whole. The conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: E. F. G. Increasing the required lot size or yard dimension. Limiting the height, size or location of buildings. Controlling the location and number of vehicle access points. Increasing the street width. Increasing the number of required off-street parking spaces. Limiting the number, size, loeationor lighting of signs. Requiring diking, fencing, screening, landscaping or other facilities to protect adjacent or nearby property. 42 215100 -4510- Mound City Code 350.52'5, Subd. 2, H. Designating sites for open space. Any change involving structural alterations, enlargement, intensification of use, or similar change not specifically permitted by the conditional use permit issued shall require an amended conditional use permit and all procedures'shall apply as if a new permit were being issued. The Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of all conditional use permits issued including information on the use, location, and conditions imposed by the City Council; time limits, review dates, and such other information as" may be appropriate. Subd. 3. Procedure - Conditional Use Permits. he The person applying for a conditional use permit shall fill out and submit to the Zoning Administrator a conditional use application form. A site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity showing the following information: Location and dimensions of: lot, building, driveways, and off- street parking spaces. Distance between: building and front, side, and rear lot lines; principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and prineipai buildings on adjacent lots. 3. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the Administrator and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, including but not limited to the following: a. site plan drawn at scale dimensions with setbacks noted. b. location of all buildings, heights, and square footage. c. curb cuts, driveways, parking spaces. d. off-street loading areas. 43 215100 -4511 - Mound City Code 350.525, Subd. 2, A. 4.e. e. drainage plan. f. type of business, proposed number of employees by shift. proposed floor plan with use indicated and building elevations. h. sani'tary sewer and water plan with estimated use per day.. a lighting plan showing the lighting of parking area, walks, security lighting and driveway entrance lights. j. a landscape plan with a schedule of the plantings. The Zoning Administrator shall refer the application to the Planning Commission for review. The City Council shall hold a public hearing on the proposal. Notice of the public hearing shall be published in the official newspaper designated by the City at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Notice of the hearing shall also be mailed to owners of property located within three hundred and fifty (350) feet of the outer boundaries of the land to which the conditional use will be applicable. The notice shall include a description of the land and the proposed conditional use. The report of the Planning Commission shall be placed on the agenda of the Mound City Council at a regular meeting following referral from the Planning Commission. The City Council must take action on the application after receiving .the report of the Planning Commission. If it grants the conditional use permit, the City Council may impose conditions (including time limits) it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare and such conditions may include a time limit for the use to exist or operate. 44 -4512- 2/5/00 Mound City Code. 350.525, Subd. 3, F. An amended 'conditional use permit application shall be administered in a manner similar to that required for a new conditional use permit. Amended conditional use permits shall include requests for changes in conditions, and as otherwise described in this Ordinance. No application for a conditional use permit shall be resubmitted for a period of one year from the date of said order of denial. If a time limit or periodic review is included as a condition by which a conditional use permit is granted, the conditional use permit may be reviewed at a public hearing with notice of said hearing published at least ten (10) days prior to the review; it shall be the responsibility of the Zoning Administrator to schedule such public hearings and the owner of land having a conditional use permit shall not be required to pay a fee for said review. A public hearing for annual review of a conditional use permit may be granted at the discretion of the City Council. In the event that the applicant violates any of the conditions set forth in this permit, the City Council shall have the authority to revoke the conditional use permit. Bond. For any required screening, landscaping or other improvements, the City Council may request that any applicant file with the Clerk a bond or other financial guarantee in the amount of one and one-quarter times the Engineer's estimate of the cost of the required improvement. 45 2/5/0~ -4513- Mound City Code 350.525, SuM. 3, K. After the approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the apPlicant, owner or developer, before commencing any work or obtaining any building permits, may be required to make a minimum cash deposit of $250.00. The Council may establish an amount above the minimum deposit at the time the permit is approved and this deposit shall be held in a special Developer's Escrow Account and shall be credited to the said applicant, owner, or developer. .. Engineering and leg.al expenses incurred by the City of Mound in plan approval, office and field checking, checking and setting grade and drainage requirements, general supervisions, staking, inspection, drafting as-built drawings and all other engineering services performed in the processing of said development, and all administrative and legal expenses in examining title to the property and in reviewing or preparing all documents for the land being developed shall be charged to the aforementioned account and shall be credited to the City of Mound for the payment of these expenses. If at any time it appears that a deficit will occur in any Developer's Escrow Account as determined by the City Manager, said officials shall recommend to the Council that an additional deposit is required and the Council may require that the applicant, owner or developer shall deposit additional funds in the Developer's Escrow Account. The. City Engineer and City Attorney shall itemize all services and materials billed to any Developer's Escrow Account. The applicant, owner or developer making the deposit(s) in the Developer's Escrow Account shall, upon .request, be furnished a copy of said itemized charges and any balance remaining in the account upon completing the project shall be returned to the depositor by the Clerk after all claims and charges thereto have been paid. 46 2/5/00 -4514- ?~operty Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: i ................ HOUSE or BUILDING #: ....... STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters) commerce Blvd UNIT # (if applicable) ~ records per page Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Hennepin County, MN Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated daily (Monday- Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 ':,;,/'~2~;,~,~ :~'~'~. ! !!i ,-v ~ 3": ~.<.~..~,, .~.,:,~.:: ,~:,.:. ..... ~.: ':: 23-117-24-14-0008 2642 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND 277 Construction year: 1965 3 Parcel Size: 100 X 10 F TODD WARNER BRISTOL CLASSIC LTD DBA MAHOGANY BAY 2642 COMMERECE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. Sale Date: April, 2000 Sale Price: $160,000 Transaction Type: Warranty Deed Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description UNPLATTED 23 117 24 COM AT A PT IN E LINE OF LAKE AVE DIS 100 FT S FROM S LINE OF CHAPMAN AVE IN PLAT OF MOUND BAY PARK TH E PAR WITH CHAPMAN AVE 100 FT TH S PAR WITH Note: This is a Partial Metes & Bounds Description Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: $160,000 $160,000 $160,000 $4,779.19 http ://www2. co. hennepin.mn, us/pins/addrresul*.. ~ 1 5 - 9/11/2002 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 2 of 2 Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $30.49 $4,809.68 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 200t Values: $40,000 $120,000 $160,000 $4O,OOO $120,OO0 $160,000 COMMERCIAL NON- HOMESTEAD 12009 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to co Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don.Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati, Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresul-~4,516- 9/11/2002 Hcnnepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Property ID 23-117-24-14~008 Property Address 2642 CObI~ERCE BLVD MOUND, MN 55364 Last update: 09/04/2002 at h00:00 PM Approximate Property Perimeter 399 ft. Market Value $ 160,000 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected · ::, ~$.~::;4~.~:~ ............. :..: . .~........:...~.:...:., :...:.:.:,~.:. ~~:..%.?.:: Approximate Property Area 9,930 sq.ft. = 0.228 acres Total Tax (2002) $ 4,809.68 This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder(~,co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http://wwwl9.co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrim,-4~:l~7-me=Hennepin&Cmd=ZOOMOUT... 9/11/2002 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE # 02-34 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MAHOGANY BAY (P&Z CASE NO. 00-38) TO EXTEND THE TIMELINE WHICH REQUIRES PAVING OF THE PARKING LOT AT 2642 COMMERCE BLVD. PID # 23-117-24-14-0008 PLANNING AND ZONING CASE NO. 02-34 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers, 5431 Maywood Road, at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, September 24, 2002 to hold a public hearing to consider an application from Todd Warner of Mahogany Bay, 2642 Commerce Boulevard, for an amendment to the conditional use permit (P&Z Case 00-38) to extend the timeframe which requires paving of the parking lot by October 1, 2002. Jill Norlander, Planning and Inspections Secretary Copies of the plans are available to the public upon request at City Hall. Ail persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Notice to be mailed to property owners within (350) feet to affected property on or before September 14, 2002. -4518- '..~ Ce~terline of Bartlett Bird. BARTLETT BLVDi /"'~ (now Bartlett BI~.) ' e oroll~ with the P~O Tho, of gro~l ~..I " Sou. '.. the ) ' 1oo. of line. beg~ parking Extst~g lot (now Bargef~ ~'~ p~in~ ~o~ " plan, or re~ :4~19-tm tho, , om o CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE # 02-34 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MAHOGANY BAY (P&Z CASE NO. 00-38) TO EXTEND THE TIMELINE WHICH REQUIRES PAVING OF THE PARKING LOT AT 2642 COMMERCE BLVD. PID # 23-117-24-14-0008 PLANNING AND ZONING CASE NO. 02-34 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers, 5431 Maywood Road, at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, September 24, 2002 to hold a public hearing to consider an application from Todd Warner of Mahogany Bay, 2642 Commerce Boulevard, for an amendment to the conditional use permit (P&Z Case 00-38) to extend the timeframe which requires paying of the parking lot by October 1, 2002. ~}/! ~ ]/244 ~ Jil[l ~lar/d~r, Planning and Inspections Secretary Copies of the plans are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Notice to be mailed to property owners within (350) feet to affected property on or before September 14, 2002. _~4 5Printed on recycled paper 20- looking southwest from Mahogany Bay porch #1 looking west from Mahogany Bay facing Commerce Boulevard #2 Same as #2 #3 west facing view, showing water flow north to south ~4 southwest view showing terminus puddle of water flow -4521 - facing north showing water flow from the north side of Bartlett Blvd another view showing water flow and erosion of Kirby's Bait parking lot #7 view of northeast comer of Kirby's Bait parking lot, showing erosion and water flow from the northeast along bartlett View facing south towards Chapman Place, parallel with Commerce Blvd #9 Same as number 9, plus close in to Mahogany Bay Pnrnh -4522- THE GILLESPIE CENTER 2590 COMMERCE BOULEVARD - MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 September 16, 2002 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Att: Kandice Hanson VZe, at the Gillespie Center, have been billed for several permits, etc. totaling over $6,000.00. kVe have cut expenses to the bone and work long volunteer hours to make the center sound This debt has been hanging over our heads and we would appreciate so very much, if the city could forgive the amount owed Sincerely, Sharon Cook Gillespie Center Board President Owned and Operated by Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation Phone: 952-472-6501 ~' Fax: 952-472-6505 -4523- ~ooo0, Lid, I~- 0 Z ~ ~4 ~- U 0 Z '~ 0 crrY oP MOUND Meeting Minutes Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting held on 09/1602 Date printed 09/I 7/02 The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, September 16, 2002 at Mound Fire Station: Present: Todd Christopherson Amcon TC Miles Britz SEH MB Kandis Hanson City KH Matt Simoneau City MS John McKinley City JM Greg Pederson City GP 1. GP working with John Dean to make sure lease is ok before signing. 2. GP asked about water and electrical drops in the apparatus bay. There has been some discussion about this, but not completed. There are support columns planned in the bay; they are shown on the current floor plan. GP wants to make sure that there is adequate flexibility for future changes. 3. Soils study - MB working on this. He will set up a meeting between his soils engineers, structural engineers, and Amcon. 4. Hanson Spancrete will not have the samples ready for tonight. SEH will have a rendering tonight instead. 5. BB said he has gotten info from the Masons regarding a donated corner stone and ceremony. 6. Kitchen layout. JA was to send SEH a marked up layout of the space. The Fire Department has some concems about the layout and needs to convey this information to SEH. 7. Some of the equipment that is needed in the kitchen could be procured from vendors that sell used equipment in an effort to save some money. We will issue the plan to a few vendors and ask for quotes on some of the pieces that they may have as used in their inventory. 8. Retaining wall - we will work out color selections once the building colors are set. 9. Scotty B's cooler - GP and will go to look at this to see if it can be incorporated. GP to take digital photos and forward to TC and MB for review. 10. Reviewed the new schedule that was handed out. New bid date for all bid packages is 12/18. Construction start is demo on 3/3/03. Completion is 11/27/03. 11. GP gave update on the participation agreements with partner cities. 12. Should have an updated budget for DD for the entire building two weeks from today. 13. The Well No. 6 shut down has happened. 14. TC to talk with Strommen Tuesday AM regarding burying of the power lines. 15. GP called the neighbors and let them know that we are still considering their property. KH reported that the County has valued the entire lot at about $45,000. The owner wants $75,000 for just the 3000 SF parcel in question. The plan works without the additional space, so if they do not want to sell for a lower price, we will proceed without the added property. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~MBO5CHI7~lPS 09 16 02.doc -4525- Page 1 of 2 CITY OF MOUHD Meeting held on 09/1602 Date printed 09/17/02 16. Ground breaking has been set for 3/1/03 at 11 AM at the Fire Hall. We will begin the demo at that time in a ceremonial manner and then start full force on Monday. 17. Asbestos removal to be started on 2/17. There is a $300 increase due to labor increases. 18. Discussed future meeting dates. The 9/30 meeting will focus on mechanical, electrical, and door hardware. KH will not be at this meeting and does not want to have other color and aesthetic design decisions made in her absence. 19. The building committee ended at 5:15. Greg Palm, Matt, and SB joined the group for the design meeting. 20. SB presented some colored renderings showing different options for metal roof color and glass color. 21. The group preferred the green metal option. 22. SB presented a detailed elevation of the front (east side) of the building. 23. Apparatus bay doors will be white where not glass. 24. The window sun screens and window framing will be dear anodized aluminum. 25. The bollards at the doors will be steel pipes, painted a coordinating color- not bright yellow. Discussed using a rope wrap around them to create a nautical theme. The consensus was to not do so at this time. 26. MB explained the elevation of the building and the different precast textures planned. 27. Jeff Andersen arrived and gave SEH some sketches of the proposed kitchen layout changes. 28. Discussed a logo or artwork impression into the hose tower wall. Options are a falcon, a flrefighter carrying a child, or some other. The elevator tower will be a location for a similar police symbol. SEH to give some preliminary sketches for pricing. JA wants to do fund raising for these elements prior to construction. 29. Discussed the monument sign. SEH had two options; one is taller and has a raised planting area in front. The other is not as tall and has no raised planting area. The consensus was to go with the shorter one - it has better sight lines and costs less. The lettering could be cast in or carved in if stone; or they could be applied metal lettering to allow future flexibility. 30. Meeting adjourned at 6:15 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy. C:\WINDOWS\Local SeEings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~VlBO5CHIT~vlPS 09 16 02.doc -4526- Page 2 of 2 -4527- -4528- -4529- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO'. Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP / Sarah Smith DATE: September 17, 2002 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision / Hardcover Variance APPLICANT: Kelly and Veronica Johnson CASE NUMBERS: 02-16 / 02-36 LOCATION: 2331 Driftwood Lane ZONING: R-1A Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential SUMMARY At its September 16, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed an application for a minor subdivision submitted by Kelly and Veronica Johnson to receive a portion property from the adjacent property at 4815 Bartlett Blvd (Parcel A). This boundary adjustment will allow the applicants (Parcel B) to include the gravel drive area that is located almost wholly within their property. Legal descriptions for each parcel are indicated on the Certificate of Survey that was provided as part of the application materials. Although it is not referenced in the Planning Report, City staff also commented that a hardcover variance is also necessary as the coverage allowance on Parcel B changes from 40 percent to 30 percent if the boundary adjustment is approved. Members of the Planning Commission indicated that the actual field conditions are not changing and therefore felt comfortable with the hardcover variance but commented that it was reasonable for the applicant to maintain no more than 40 percent since this is the standard in the neighborhood. The applicants indicated that they plan to undertake a number of landscaping activities in this area upon approval of the boundary adjustment that will reduce the amount of coverage on their property. RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the minor subdivision and variance as recommended by Staff subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicants comply with the 40 percent hardcover restriction for Parcel B. The existing utility easement located on Parcel B of 15' should be increased to 20' and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to recording of the plat. -4530- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND HARDCOVER VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2331 DRIFTWOOD LANE P & Z CASE # 02-16 AND # 02-36 WHEREAS, the applicants, Kelly and Veronica Johnson, have requested a minor subdivision to adjust a boundary line to transfer ownership of an existing gravel driveway area from the adjacent property located at 4815 Bartlett Boulevard (Parcel A) to their property located at 2331 Drii~wood Lane (Parcel B); and WHEREAS, the minor subdivision also requires a hardcover variance since approval of minor subdivision reduces the lot coverage allowance from 40 percent to 30 percent. The variance is indicated below: Existing Proposed Allowed. Variance ParcelB (south) 5172 SF 6646 SF 4756 SF 1890 SF ; and WHEREAS, the property is located within the R-1 Single Family Residential District and subject to City Code Chapter 350:620; and WHEREAS, minor boundary adjustments are regulated by City Code Chapter 330:20 Subd. 1 (B); and WHEREAS, currently, Parcel A has a driveway access on Bartlett Boulevard and a drive that connects to the driveway proposed for transfer to Parcel B; and WHEREAS, the minor subdivision (boundary adjustment) will allow the existing gravel driveway area tb be located almost wholly within Parcel B which is owned by the applicants; and WHEREAS, approval of the minor subdivision reduces the amount of hardcover allowance on the subject properties from 40 percent to 30 percent; and WHEREAS, the amount ofhardcover in the field is not changing as a result of the minor subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the minor subdivision and variance as requested by the applicant and recommended for approval by Staff; and, -4531- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the Minor Subdivision and Variance request with the following conditions: A. The applicants comply with the 40 percent hardcover restriction for Parcel B. The existing utility easement located on Parcel B of 15' should be increased to 20' and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to recording of the plat. 2. This minor subdivision and variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Refer to Exhibit A The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted September 24, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -4532- Excerpts from the MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 2002 CASE #02-16 Minor Subdivision - Kelly & Veronica Johnson 2331 Driftwood Lane This request is for a boundary adjustment primarily involving the gravel driveway. Parcel A on the north is transferring land to Parcel B. The area being transferred does not cause any new non- conformities. There are some existing non-conformities that are not affected. Hardcover is not being added, however, the change in lot of record status reduces the percentage ofhardcover allowable from 40 to 30 percent and makes Parcel B non-conforming in that respect. Public Works acknowledged the need for an additional 5 feet for a 20 foot utility easement instead of the current 15 feet. Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the increased utility easement. Discussion Mueller felt that, since the applicants plan to reduce the size of the driveway, they ought to reduce hardcover by 300 SF to at least bring it into the 40% conformance. MOTION by Weiland, seconded by Mueller, to accept staff's recommendation to accept staff recommendation with the condition that the easement be changed to 20 feet and the applicant remove hardcover to comply with the 40% requirement. MOTION camed unanimously -4533- PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: September 12, 2002 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision APPLICANT: Kelly and Veronica Johnson CASE NUMBERS: 02-16 ltKG FILE NUMBER: 02-05 LOCATION: 2331 Driftwood Lane ZONING: R-I Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION The applicant has submitted an application for a minor subdivision to receive a portion property from their neighbors who are addressed at 4815 Bartlett Blvd (parcel A). This boundary adjustment will allow the applicant (parcel B) to include the gravel drive area almost wholly within their property. Legal descriptions for each are indicated on the certificate of survey provided in the application materials. Applicable code sections for this request are provided for in the Minor Boundary Adjustments section of the Subdivision Ordinance Section 330:20 Subd. 1 (B). Parcel A has a driveway access on Bartlett and a drive that connects to the driveway area proposed for transfer to Parcel B. Staff would anticipate the Bartlett Drive would be the primary access to the property and any future garage would likely be built in the west sideyard. There may be some opportunity for the owners to continue to share the driveway although this request seems to indicate the owners are formalizing their intensions with the proposed property boundaries. Each lot as it exists today exceeds the minimum lot area of the R-1 DiStrict and will also after the property transfer with 13,890 square feet and 14,230 square feet respectively. Each house also has nonconforming setbacks but are not impacted by the boundary adjustment and therefore are not relevant to the request. 123 Nml:h Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Mim~esota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -4534- -', £. 2 # 02-16 dohnson Minor Subdivision September 12, 2002 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Copies of the minor subdivision application were forwarded to all City departments for review. All written comments which were received are outlined below: Public Works: The existing utility easement of 15' should be increased to 20'. The sanitary sewer is 15' deep at the west lot line. City Engineer: Refer to memorandum from City Engineer John Cameron that has been included as an attachment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve the minor subdivision as requested with the following conditions: 1. The existing utility easement located on Parcel B of 15' should be increased to 20' and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to recording of the plat. 123 No~h Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Mirmesota 55401 -4535 _O800 Fax (612) 338-6838 City of Mound MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: Distribution: City Planner DNR Public Works Parks City Engineer Other CiTY OF MOUND Application Fee: $ 250 Escrow Deposit: $1,000 Deficient Unit Charges? Delinquent Taxes? Variance Required?__ Please type or print clearly INFO EXISTING Lot ~ Block Subdivision LEGAL PID~ DESCRIPTION Plat # ZONING DISTRICT Circle: . R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 The applicant is: _~.owner ' other: APPLICANT OWNER Name (if other than applicant) Address Phone (H) (W),, (M) SURVEYO. Name Phone (H)~ -- 4~ ~-- 4/¢ I (W).,. (M) Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, (~.no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of ///~in,~ntaining and re,moving such ~otices as may be required by law. ~~- ?¢~¢plicc~t~t's SignatUre//. ~. , ' ~-~ Date ' (~/wner~ Signature / .... ~ ...... 'Date Minor Subd Application Page 1 of 1 Revised 01/30/02 -4536- 09/17/02 13:30 FAX 9524720679 CITY OF MOUND ~001 City of Mound VARIANCE APPUCATION Planning Commission Date ~/~::~ City ~ Date <:~ ! _~ Application Fee: $200'.00 .., Case No. Distribution "~ City Planner ~~, DNR City Engineer ',,' PARKS Public 'Works 'Other ~"- Please t ~ SUBJECT Address LEGAL _ Block Subdivision ZONING DIS~ICT OWNER J APPUCANT ~e (IF OTHER THAN Add~s OWNER) Ph~e (H) , , (~ (M~ an ap; ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (~). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resok~tion number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed ,~-~'--= ............ eecl ~caon or:alteration (size, Ru~ of$tx~ies, typeof use, etc.): Variance Application Page 1 of 3 Revised 03/26/02 -4537- 09/17/02 13:31 FAX 9524720679 CITY OF MOUND ~002 Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with ali area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district irt which it is located? yes (/~ No ( ~. ff rt~, spec~ each non-conforming use (describe mason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. fL ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ff. ft. Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ff. ft. ft. : (NSEW) ft. fl. ft. Street Frontage: ff. ft. fL Lot Size: SCl ft .sq ft _sq ft Hardcover. sq ff sq ft sq ft 4. Does the Present use of the property conform to ali regulations for the zoning district ~ which it is located? Yes (),;), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteHsacs ofthe subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narro~v :~L.too small ( ) tooshsllow Please describe: ~,/~//' ( )topography ( 7 ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) shape ( ) other: Variance Application Page 2of3 Revised 03/26/02 -4538- 09/17/02 13:31 FAX 95247206.79 CI~Z OF MOtJND [~003 Case No. 6. Was the .hardship described above created by the action of anyone hay'rog property interests in the [and after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)?. Yes (), No~. If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No (~, If yes, exptain: 8. Am the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property desCribed in this petition? Yes ~ No ( )~ tf t~, list some other properties which are s/m~ady affected? Comments: r certify.that ali of the.above statements and-the-statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information previded. I~ consent te the entry i~ oruponthe pmm~es described ~n this application by any authorized official of the.City of MoUnd for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removingsuch Veriance Application Page 3 of 3 Rev;se(/~ Date -4539- CITY OF MOUND NARBCOVER OALOULATION$ (IMPERVIOUS 8LJRFAOE COVERAGE) ,,~,,,IX CC' ~ j PROPERTY ADDES$: ..... LOT AREA /,~O SO. FT. × 30% = (for all lots) ....................................... LOT A~EA. /,~'~ SQ. FT. X 40% ~ (for Lots of IR~¢ord) ............................. L ~-~-,~, LOT AREA /.~ ~Q. FT, X 15% = (for drenched buildings only) .................. ° ExisUng Lot~ of Record may have ¢0 percent coverage provided tha~ te~niques sm u~l~ed, ~ ou~in~ in Zoning O~nan~ Se~on 350:1~5, Sub& 6.B. 1 (see ba~), A plan must be subdued and a~proved ~ ~s Building ~. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGFJSHED) TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... X ~ X = DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. DECKS 0~n decks (1/4" min. Op~nlng betwl!i~fl boards) with a ~e~ous surface under are not counted s~ h,,rd~over, TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... TOTAL DRIVEWAY. ETC ........................................ X ~ X = X = TOTAL DECK ....................................................... TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL' HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SUPJ=ACE ................................................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................................................................... PREPARED BY Rev 08-2~-94 -4540- 1 RECEIVED MAY ! 2002 MOUI B PLANNING & !N, P PROPERTY ADDESS: CITY OF MOUND .HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE} OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA LOT AREA LOT AREA SQ. FT. X30%= (for all lots) ....................................... SQ. FT, X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. L SQ. FT, X 1S% = (for detached buildings only) .................. [ /& 4-O · Exi~Ur~g Lot~ of Record'may have ¢0 percent ~vemge prodded thai te~niques sm u~l~ed, as ou~ined in Zoning O~nan~ Scion 350:1~5, Subd, 8.B.1 (see back), A plan must be subdued an~ approved ~ ~ Building LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X DETACHED BUILDINGS · (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC, DECKS Open decks (1/4" rain, Opening betwaen boards) with a pe~ous_surfac~ under are no~ ~unt~ ss he~er. TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... x' : 77~ X = x : TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ X = X = X = q/Il- .m TOTAL DECK ....................................................... w^~. x --.. 4-~ TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................................................................... PREPARED BY Rev 08-29-94 '71 -4541 - PROPERTY ADDEB"S: OWNER'S NAME; V~r4,o~fc,~ ~otfNSO~t LOT AREA:./d--Z.~a) LOT AREA I ~ 2~ o LOT AREA /4' 2.3¢ CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERA(3E) SQ, FT. X 30% = (for all tots) ....................................... SQ. FT, X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. SQ. FT, X 15% = (for detached buildings only) .................. * Existing Lots of Flaoora may have 40 percent c~verage provided that ~echnlquas sm utilized, as ouflned in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subcl. 8.B.1 (see back), A plan must be subrn{ffed and approved bylha Building CfC, dat.. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = DETACHED BUILDINGS ' (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, iSARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... X TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening betwl~n boards) with a ~ervtous suda~e under are not c, ounte~ ~ hardoo¥~,r. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ X = X = X = TOTAL DECK ....................................................... x = ~ TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER/IMPERVIOUS SUP, FACE ................................................... UNDER / OVER ('indicate difference) .................................................................... Rev 08-29-94 -4542- DATE HAY I. 2002 PROPERTY ADD~.~'~: " , , , LOT AREA /,.,~'~'.~-~ CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVEE CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE} II iI LOT AREA /~',~'~' .. LOT AREA /.~'~.~...~.. SQ. FT, X 30% = (for all tots) ....................................... SQ. FT, X 40% [] (for Lots of Record) ............................. SQ. FT, × 15% = (for detached buildings only) .................. , ExbUng Lo~ of P. eco~ max have ~.0 porcent ~verage provtdad that techniques sm ulJlized, as ouffined in Zoning Ord]nance Section 350:1225, Sub& ~.IL1 (ams ba~k), Al~lan must be eubmltt~d and a~proved bytha Building LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE ~ DETACHED BUILDINGS ' ' (GARAGEJSHED) TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... X = ~ X = DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC, TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... x = X = ,~/? x : ~-/ TOTAL DR1VEWAY, ETC ........................................ DECKS Own decks (1/4" min. Opening betWl~a~"l boards) wt~h a pe~ous surface under ara, not TOTAL DECK .................. ' .............................. X = ~ X ~ TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SUi~:AOE ................................................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) · · Rev ,4 -4543- MEMORA ND UM DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 TO: SARAH SMITH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: JOHNSON MINOR SUBDIVISION 2331 DRIFTWOOD LANE CASE NO. 02-16 MFRA File No. 13970 As requested, I have reviewed subject request for a minor subdivision and have the following comments and recommendations: It appears that this minor subdivision is being requested to adjust the property line to match the existing conditions, in particular to divide the existing driveway between the two homes. Some consideration may be given to providing cross easements between the two the 2 parcels for use of the common driveway; however it appears that each homeowner will have approximately 15 feet on their own property. 2. Both parcels are developed and no proposed construction is requested; therefore there should not be any outstanding issues affecting drainage or utilities. 15050 23R[~ AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 -4544- JCAMERON@MFRA.COM (763)476-6010 FAX (763) 476-8532 CE]~TIFICATE OF SURV"~f FOR VERONICA JOHNSON IN OOV'T LOT B, SECTION 13-117-24 HENNI~°IN COUNTY, ~$OTA RECEIVED JUL 3 1 ZOOZ MOUND PLANNING& INSP. L-'. H. nep n ~un~ .5 '. ~0' DRI~ LONG LA~, MN 553I ~W PHO] FAX: g52~73~ [E: 952~141 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 18, 2002 SUBJECT: Waiver of platting and variance approval to subdivide Lots 1 Highlands, Hennepin County, Minnesota APPLICANT: Steve and Lynn Bedell (buyer) / Charles and Alice Macnamara (current owner / seller) PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-30 / 02-33 LOCATION: 5925 Ridgewood Road PID: 23-117-24-43-0039 ZONING: R- 1A Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential and 2, Block 6, The SUMMARY At is September 16, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a request from Steve and Lynn Bedell (buyer) and Charles and Alice McNamara (current owner/seller) for "waiver of platting" approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, The Highlands, Hennepin County, Minnesota in order to create a new "buildable" parcel on the west side. The applicants are also requesting a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming setback of (8.5) feet on the east side along the unimproved public parkway. BACKGROUND Details regarding the request are contained in Planning Report No. 02-30. SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 330:12 states that any parcel of land, either platted or unplatted that has been combined for tax purposes or other reasons, cannot be re-separated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of the subdivision ordinance. A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City Council after receipt of the background information provided by City staff The waiver of platting and release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be in compliance with all City codes. The City may impose conditions to the waiver. -4546- Applications for waiver of plating do not require review by the Planning Commission. However, if it so desires, the City Council may remand the application to the Planning Commission if it determines that their advice will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. Additionally, if the application for a waiver of platting request requires any variance from any City code requirement, the waiver application shall be processed in accordance with City Code Section 330:170 and shall be referred to the Planning Commission and processed as any other variance request under the subdivision ordinance. Members of the City Council are advised that the waiver request was forwarded to the Planning Commission prior to action by the City Council since a variance was necessary to recognize an existing non-conforming setback on proposed Parcel A (Lot 1 .) PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW In general, members of the Planning Commission were in favor of the proposed lot division. However, the majority of the discussion focused on whether or not the proposed division is eligible for "waiver of platting" approval since portions of Lots 1 and 2, Block 6 were split off previously. Members of the Planning Commission indicated that they believed the proposed action was actually a minor subdivision pursuant to the Subdivision Ordinance. City staff informed the Planning Commission that the submittal requirements and notification procedures for both types of requests are essentially the same and that the information contained in the Planning Report remains applicable. Therefore, a recommendation on the current application either as a waiver of platting or minor subdivision could be forwarded to the City Council. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION City Attorney John Dean has reviewed the current application and subdivision regulations and determined that the subject property is eligible for "waiver of platting approval" since Lots 1 and 2 were combined prior to any subsequent subdivision activity of the southern lot(s) which front Highland Boulevard and the current proposal is working within the existing lot lines~ RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the waiver of platting and variance applications from Steve and Lynn Bedell and Charles and Alice Macnamara to subdivide the property located at 5925 Ridgewood Road into (2) parcels subject to the conditions listed below: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. The storage shed located on the west side of the existing garage is to be removed. 2 -4547- 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as pans of this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved. 4. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit applications, when appropriate. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits including, but not limited to, MCWD, DNR, etc. 6. All conditions from the City Engineer. 7. One (1) park dedication fee is paid. 3 -4548- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE REQUEST FROM STEVE AND LYNN BEDELL AND CHARLES AND ALICE MACNAMARA FOR WAIVER OF PLATTING AND VARIANCE APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 6, THE HIGHLANDS, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA INTO TWO (2) LOTS PID # 23-117-24-43-0039 PLANNING CASE # 02-30 AND # 02-33 WHEREAS, the applicants, Steve and Lynn Bedell (buyer) and Charles and Alice Macnamara (seller) have submitted a request for waiver of platting approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, the Highlands into two (2) lots; WHEREAS, the waiver of platting application also requires approval of a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming front setback of (8.5) feet for the single-family house presently located on Parcel A; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 5925 Ridgewood Road; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-1A and single-family residential is a permitted use; and WHEREAS, Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, The Highlands, are platted lots and were combined previously by a former owner; and WHEREAS, Lots 1 and 2, Block 6, The Highlands meet the lot size, width, and depth requirements of the R- 1A District; and -4549- WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 330:12 states that a waiver of platting request may be granted by the City Council if it is determined that the proposal is in compliance with all City codes; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 330:12 also states that any waiver of platting application that requires a variance must be reviewed by the Commission; and Planning WHEREAS, the waiver of platting and variance request were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 16, 2002 meeting and unanimously recommended for approval subject to conditions. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the waiver of platting and variance requests with the following conditions: a. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. b. The storage shed located on the west side of the existing garage is to be removed. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as parts of this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved. d. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. e. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits including, but not limited to, MCWD, DNR, etc. f. All conditions from the City Engineer. g. One (1) park dedication fee is paid. 2. This waiver of platting and variance request is hereby approved for the following described property: See Exhibit A -4550- The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted September 24, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -4551 - Excerpts from the MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 2002 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #02-30 Waiver of Platting - Steve Bedell/Charles & Alice MacNamara 5925 Ridgewood Road The request is from Steve and Lynn Bedell (buyer) and Charles and Alice McNamara (current owner) to create a buildable parcel on the west side. They are also requesting to recognize a non-conforming setback with a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming setback of 8.5 feet on the east side along the unimproved public parkway. Presently, there is a single-family home and detached garage on proposed Parcel A (Lot 1). Proposed Parcel B (Lot 2) is currently undeveloped with the exception of a 10' x 14' shed that is to be removed. The Bedells intend to rent out the existing home and sell off the new lot. Staff recommends approval of this request subject to the requirements outlined in the Planning Report. Discussion Mueller sees the waiver request as a way to skirt the real issues. He was under the impression that, because there was also a variance request, it would require a regular subdivision. Jim Bedell said technically it could be 4 lots but we are requesting 2 very generous lots. MOTION by Michael, seconded by Weiland, to recommend approval subject to staff conditions in addition to the requiring the removal of the shed on Parcel A as condition 7. Gus Knott - First of all, Ridgewood Drive on the survey is actually Ridgewood Road. The shed isn't a concern to him as long as it is maintained well. Mueller said that these parcels were subdivided at one time. How can they be existing lots of record to qualify for waiver of platting? Smith indicated that the review and process as a minor subdivision is exactly the same. If it doesn't qualify as a waiver of platting it would qualify as a minor subdivision. MOTION carded unanimously Mueller wants the City Council to know the following: This shouldn't have been a waiver of platting because: 1) It was not a simple redrawing of existing lot lines, and; 2) It required a variance. Because it was reviewed by the Planning Commission as a minor subdivision would have been we are recommending it. -4552- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 9, 2002 SUBJECT: Request for waiver of platting and variance approval to subdivide Lots Block 6, The Highlands, Hennepin County, Minnesota APPLICANT: Steve and Lynn Bedell (buyer) / Charles and Mice Macnamara (current owner seller) PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-30 LOCATION: 5925 Ridgewood Road PID: 23-117-24-43-0039 ZONING: R-lA Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential I and 2, SUMMARY The Planning Commission will review a request from Steve and Lynn Bedell (buyer) and Charles and Alice McNamara (current ovmer/seller) for "waiver of platting" approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 1 & 2, Block 6, The Highlands, Hennepin County, Minnesota in order to create a new "buildable" parcel on the west side. The applicants are also requesting a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming setback of (8.5) feet on the east side along the unimproved public parkway, SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 330:12 states that any parcel of land, either platted or unplatted that has been combined for tax purposes or other reasons, cannot be re-separated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of the subdivision ordinance. A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City Council after receipt of the background information provided by City staff. The waiver of platting and release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be in compliance with all City codes. The City may impose conditions to the waiver. Applications for waiver of platting do not require review by the Planning Commission. However, if it so desires, the City Council may remand the application to the Planning Commission if it determines that their advice will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. -4553- If the application for a waiver of platting request requires any variance from any City code requirement, the waiver application shall be processed in accordance with City Code Section 330:170 and shall be referred to the Planning Commission and processed as any other variance request under the subdivision ordinance. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property Details. Steve and Lynn Bedell have signed a purchase agreement to buy the subject property located at 5925 Ridgewood Road from Charles and Alice Macnamara on or before October 15, 2002. Presently, there is a single-family home and detached garage on proposed Parcel A (Lot 1). Proposed Parcel B (Lot 2) is currently undeveloped with the exception of a 10' x 14' shed which is to be removed. The Bedells intend to rent out the existing home and sell off the new lot. Property Tax Status. According to Hennepin County property tax records, the subject property is considered to be one parcel and is legally described as Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 6, The Highlands, Hennepin County, Minnesota Certificate of Survey. A certificate of survey for the subject property dated August 15, 2002 was prepared by Gronberg &Associates and has been included as an attachment. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map included in the Mound Comprehensive Plan guides the property for future low-density residential use (1-6 units / acre.) Zoning Information. The subject property is zoned R-IA. The following table includes the lot area, width and setback requirements for the R-lA District as well as the lot information for proposed Parcel A and Parcel B: Lot Area Width Depth Front Setback Side Rear Setback Setback R-lA 6,000 SF 40 FT 80 FT 20 FT 10 FT 15 FT Parcel A 15818 SF 62 FT 216 FT 64FT/8.5 FT* 10.3 FT 84 FT Parcel B 11342 SF 60FT 194FT 28.2 FT 26.6 FT / 18.4 FT 154FT * Appicant has requested a variance to recognize existing setback of 8.5 feet. City Code requires a minimum front setback of (20) feet. Non-Lot of Record Status. In the event the waiver of platting request is approved, the subject property will lose its "lot of record" status and therefore will be subject to the standard provisions of the R- 1A zoning district. 2 -4554- Adjacent Land Uses - Draft Land Use Plan. The subject property is surrounded on all sides by low density residential use. ltardcover. Impervious surface coverage on all non-lots of record shall not exceed (30) percent of the lot area. The information submitted as part of the application materials indicate that proposed Parcel A and proposed Parcel B will meet the hardcover restrictions of (30) percent. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire ChiefPederson Acting Police Chief McKinley Public Works Director Skinner Building Official Simoneau City Engineer Cameron Parks Director Fackler No objections. No objections. Refer to comments from City Engineer. No objections. Refer to memorandum from City Engineer. No comments. NOTIFICATION While City Code does not require public notification, current City policy indicates that adjacent property owners are notified as a courtesy. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that notification regarding the request was forwarded to the adjacent property owners on or around September 13, 2002. GENERAL COMMENTS The subject property is fronted on the north side by Ridgewood Road and an unimproved (20) foot public parkway on the east side and is therefore subject to double front yard setback requirements of (20) feet on each side. The existing house on proposed Parcel A is currently located (8.5) feet from the east property line therefore a variance of (11.5) feet is needed. This is an existing condition. No construction is contemplated as part of the current application. The applicant is advised that approval of the proposed waiver of platting does not constitute or guarantee future approval of any building permit(s) or any other necessary approval by any other public agency. In the event the waiver request is approved, the property will no longer qualify for "lot of record" status. -4555- It is City staff's understanding that the existing 10' x 14' shed on proposed Parcel B and the small storage shed located on the west side of the existing garage on proposed Parcel A are to be removed. The lot area for proposed Parcel A and Parcel B significantly exceed the 6000 SF minimum lot size of the R-lA District. RECOMMENDATION City staff' recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the waiver of platting and variance application(s) from Steve and Lynn Bedell and Charles and Alice Macnamara to subdivide the property located at 5925 Ridgewood Road into (2) parcels subject to the conditions listed below: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit applications, when appropriate. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits including, but not limited to, MCWD, DNR, etc. 5. All conditions from the City Engineer. 6. One (1) park dedication fee is paid. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received by the Planning Commission at its September 16, 2002 meeting, it is anticipated that the waiver of platting and variance application(s) for 5925 Ridgewood Road will be forwarded to the City Council for review at either its September 24, 2002 or October 2, 2002 meeting. 4 -4556- / PROPOSED L'OT DIVISION AND CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR STEVE BEDELL IN LOTS 1 &: 2, BLOCK 6, THE HIGHLANDS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA \ \ \ ~G / \ HOUSE xX P~RCEL B ', --, PARCEL A ,"' 11~2~ ~. ~. N I~18~ ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF Lot 1, except thor po dietont 130 feet Nort lot dietont 127.36 fe thereof; Lot 2, excep of sold lot distant 1 line of sold Lot diet o : denotes ironmork (g08_1): denotes existing This survey intends t locution of an exieti thereon. It does not 'REMI SEB : 't lying Southeaster y of o line drown frcrn a point in the Southwesterly line of sold lot . 1westerly frcrn the Southweeterly corner thereof to a pol.nt in the Northeoeterl~ line of enid ~t Northwesterly (os meosured oion9 Suid Northeosterly line) f.rcm ~he Southeas'terly cor.ne.r [ thor port wh ch .lies Sou[heosteriy of o line drown from a point ~n the Southwesterly line ~0 feet Northwester y of the Southwesterly corner thereof to o point in the Northeaster y · =nt 130 feet Northwesterly of the $outheosterly corner thereof, Block 6, "The Highlonds". spot elevation, mean sea level datum ) show the boundaries of the above described property, the ~g house gQroge Qnd shed, end the locution of oil visible "herdcover" :~urport to show uny other in'provaments or encrooc~nts. MEMORA ND UM DATE: September 12, 2002 TO: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director FROM: John Cameron, City Engineer SUBJECT: City of Mound Bedell Waiver of Platting Case No. 02-30 MFRA//13971 As requested, we reviewed the Bedell Waiver of Platting request and have the following comments and recommendations: Comments The survey submitted with the application does not show a proposed building location for the vacant lot created by the division. However, this vacant lot will be 60 feet wide with an area of almost 16,000 square feet and should easily accommodate a building site. A final site plan/survey with grading and drainage will need to be submitted when application is made for a building permit. As with most older plats in the City, the plat of "The Highlands" did not provide drainage easements along the lot lines. Therefore, drainage and utility easements should be provided along all new lot lines. City utility records show that Lot 2 (Parcel B) has an existing sewer services; however it appears there is no existing water service for the lot. Therefore, a new water service will need to be installed from the City main in Ridgewood Drive. -4558- Sarah Smith, Community Development Director September 12, 2002 Page 2 It has been City policy to collect additional unit charges from previous street improvements when properties are redividied and additional building sites are created. City records should be checked to determine the amount of unit charges assessed when Ridgewood Drive was reconstructed in the 1970's. Recent revisions to the City code requires that sanitary sewer and watermain area trunk charges, in addition to connection fees, must be paid on newly created building sites. The present area trunk charges are $1,500 each for sewer and water and the connection fee is $240 for each sewer and water, which apply to the new parcel created by the waiver of platting. Recommendations 1. Final grading and drainage plan to be approved by the City Engineer at time of building permit application. 2. Provide drainag~ and utility easement along all new lot lines of both parcels, five (5) feet wide on the side lot lines and ten (10) feet in width along the front and rear lot lines. 3. The installation of a new water service for Parcel B must either be completed or some type of financial guarantee provided, such as cash escrow, letter of credit, or performance bond. 4. Any deficient street unit charge should be coll~ed fqr the new parcel created by the Waiver of Platting. 5. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Area Trunk charges of $1,500 each, shall be paid when building permit application is made for Parcel B. ' s:~nain:\Mou 13971 :\Correspondence~smith9-11 -4559- ORDINANCE NO. 79-1996 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 330:12 TO THE CITY SUBDIVISION CODE ALLOWING FOR A WAIVER OF PLATTING The City of Mound Does Ordain: Section 330:12 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read as follows: Section 330:12. Waiver of Platting. Any parcel of land, either platted or unplatted, that has been combined for tax purposes or for other reasons, cannot be reseparated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of this code. The City has many old subdivisions with small platted lots which standing alone do not meet current zoning requirements. Many of these lots have been combined for tax purposes and for various other reasons, i.e., to create a building site, to indicate a desire to combine to avoid or reduce special assessments for improvements, etc. A waiver of the platting .requirement may be granted by the City Council after receipt of background information provided by City staff. A request for waiver of the platting requirements shall be signed by the property owner on forms prepared for and approved by the City Council, which shall include a provision to reimburse, the City for all of its costs. This request or application for a waiver shall be referred to City Staff foi review. The review by staff shall be conducted to determine if the division or release of the tax combination and the creating of new Property Identification parcels for tax and building purposes is in compliance with City Codes and all planning and zoning standards and objectives. The staff shall prepare written findings and recommendations for the Council's consideration. The waiver of platting and the release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be in compliance with all City codes. The Council may impose conditions to the waiver and shall require the payment of any deferred or forgiven specials assessments which have been avoided by a tax combination. 'The waiver may be granted without public hearings or without referral to the Planning Commission. Nothing herein shall preclude the staff or Council from referring the matter to the Commission if it is determined that their advise will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. the application for a waiver of platting requests or requires any variances from any City code requirement, the waiver application shall be processed in accordance with Section 330:170 of 'the City Code and the request shall be referred to the Planning Commission and processed as any other variance request under this subdivision, code. Mayor by the City Council on August 27, 1996. in The Laker, September 7, 1996 -4560- Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: Property ID: .......... Property ID: Address: M u nicipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: 'Hennepin County, I IN Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database i~ updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approxhnately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax Statement :, ;;-, . ~, , , . ~.~: .,v,. ' ~ ':;: C-~ ,.2~, ;.~.... : ~'~.,,..1.~-, ~ -* ~i 23-117-24-43-0039 5925 RIDGEWOOD RD MOUND 277 Construction year: 1934 3 Parcel Size: IRREGULA H C & A N MACNAMARA H CHARLES & ALICE MACNAMARA 5925 RIDGEWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. Sale Date: July, 1985 Sale Price: $90,000 Transaction Type: Contract For Deed Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description THE HIGHLANDS 006 THAT PART OF LOT 1 LYING NWLY OF A LINE DRAWN FROM A PT ON THE SWLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 DIS 130 FT NWLY MEAS ALONG SAID SWLY LINE FROM THE Note: This is a Partial Metes & Bounds Descripti Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: $154,000 $130,600 $13O,6OO $1,476.05 http ://www2. co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult..'_ 4~5{J'i' _2311724430039 8/20/2002 Property Information Search by Property D Result page Page 2 of 2 Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $24.89 $1,500.94 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Values: $44,500 $109,500 $154,000 $37,700 $92,900 $130,6O0 RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD '1207 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cor Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicatic Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http://www2.co.h'ennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult- 4~5fi'~5- 2311724430039 8/20/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 08/07/2002 at hO0:O0 PM Property ID Approximate Approximate Property Perimeter Property Area 23-117-24-43-0039 671 ff. 26,185 sq.ft. = 0.601 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2002) 5925 RIDGEWOOD RD MOUND, MN 55364 $ 154,000 $ 1,500.94 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder(~.co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http'//wwwl9 ..... co hennepin mn us/scripts/esrimr_4563'- -"' .... me=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALU 8/28/2002 PURCHASE AGREEMENT This form approved by the MJnnesola Association cf BEALTOR,,~), which disclaims any liability arising o*,t ct' use or misuse of this form. Minnesota Ass0c~aeon of REALTORS~, Edina, MN 1. Date 2. Pagelo{ , ) 4, 6. blt CHECK ~.Ae~,.H~../_.N.,_O_TE_ as ~arnest money to be deposited upon acceptance of P,,rchaea Agreemen"'~ b;al, pa.l~, on or 7. before the third business d~y a~er acceptance, In the ~ust account of listing broker but to be returned to Buyer If Purchase 8. Agreement Js not accepted by Sellei, Said earnesl monevJs peri paymenl for Ihs purchase ct the property located at: 11. Legally descr bed as P~ L~ 1 ~ '~-~l ¢~ - , _,Etale of Minnesota, 12. ' ' ' - ' , ~ _ _ 13. including lbo following property, it any, owned by Seller and used and localed on sai~ property: garden bulbs, planls, shrubs, and 1,-1. hess: storm sash, slorm doors, screens and awnings; window shades, blinds, traverse and curtain and drapery rods; altached ltghling 1.5. fixlures and bulbs; plumbing fixlures, waler healer, heating planls (wllh any burners, tanks, stok_.~.~,~..~.~_0nd other equipmen used in 16. conneclion iherewilh), built-in ail' condilioning equipment, eleclronic air filler, water softener o~ED~RENYED ! NONE buill-in 17. humidflier and dehumidifier, liquid gas lank and controls (if the property of Seller), sump pump; atlached lelevision anlenna, cable TV jacks and 18. wiring; BUILT-INS: dishwashers, garbage disposals, trash compaclors, ovens, cook lop stoves, microwave ovens, hood fans, intercoms; 19. ATTACHED: carpeling; mirrors; garage door openers and all controls; smoke deleclors; fireplace screens, doors and heatiJators; AND: the following 20. personal properly:__~ . -' 22. 2/. the Oalande of $ by financing in accordance wilh the of closing, and 2~enUon~ FHA DVA Assumption Contract for Deed PUmhase Mone allached addendum: L ............. ~ ._ .. y Mortgage Other. 29. This Purclmse Agreement ]?y~bjoct 1o a Conlingen~ Addendum lot sale of Buyer's property. (U answer is IS, see atlached addendum.) 30. (1[ answer is IS NOT, the closing o[ Buyer's properly, U any, may sUll a~Jecl Buyer's abllily Ia obtain ~lnancing, U financing Is applicable.) 3 I. This Purcl~ase Agreemenl IS ~bjecl Io cancellalion of a previously wrillen Purchase Agreement daled 32. Buyer Ires been made aware ot the a~llabilily of properly inspections. Buyer elects /declines 10 have a property i~pection performed al ~. Buyer's expense· Tl~is Purchase Agreeme~ IS NOT subjecl lo an Jnspeclion Addendum. {1[ answer is I~, see allached addendum.) 34. DEED~ARKETABLETITLE: Upon perform~ce by Buyer, Seller shall deliver a Warranty Deed or Olher: Deed 35. joined In by spouse, if any, conveying marketable lille, subject lo: .............................. (~ ~/ ........................................ 36. (A) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, slale and federal regulalions; (B) Reslriclions relating lo use or improvemenl 37. properly wllboul effective forfeiture provisions; (C) Reservation ol any mineral rights by the Slate of Minnesota: (D) Ullllty and 38. drainage easemen{s which do nol interfere with exlsling Improvemenls; (E) Rights of tenants as follows (unless specHied, 39. subjecl Io lenancies): 40. (F) Olhers (Musl be s ecified in 41. BUYER SHALL PAY I ~LER SHALL PA~n dale ol closing any delerred real estate laxes (i.e. Green Acres, sic.) or special 42. assessmenls, paymenl of which is required as a resull of II~e closing of Ihis sale. 43. BUYER AND SELLER SHALL PRORATE AS OF TIlE DATE OF CLOSING S,(/~LER SHALL PAY ON DATE OF CLOSlNG~II installmen s ....................................................................... ¥~ o,~ ........... k,.~..~.= ..... ~,~ ................. 44. of special assessmenl~ ~rttfied (or paymel3t wllh Ihs real estate laxes due and payable in the year of closing. 45...~R SHALL AS~UM~)/_SELLER SHALL PAY on dale of closing all olhar special assessments levied as of Ihs dale of this AgreemenL SRALL ASSUME S"ALL PBO ', E e al aeses en,s endin ............... ~ ......................... ~ P g as of the date of Ihis Agreemenl 47. (or improvemenls lhat have been ordered by any assessing aulhortties. (Seller's provision tot paymenl shall be by ,18. payment into escrow of two (2) times the estimated amounl of the assessments, or less as required by Buyer's lender.) -19. Buyer abalt pay any unpaid special assessmenls payable in tl~e year following closing and Ihereafler, lbo payment of which Is nol otherwise 5Q. herein provided. 51. As o~ Ihs dale ol this Agreement, Seller represents thai Se~ler _l-LA.S~ecelved a notice regarding any new improvemenl 52. project (rom any assessing authorities, Ihs cosls ct which project may be assessed egainsl the properly. Any such nolice 53. received by Seller slier the date of this Agreemenl and belora closing will be provided to Buyer Immedialely. If notice of a pending 5-1. specia, J~"~,~$menl Js issued after Ihs dale of II,is Agreemenl and on or before Ihs dale of closing, Buyer shall assume payment of 55. ALL ~/OTHER: of any such special assessmenls, and Seller shall provide for payment on date of 56. closm~[._AL~/NONE / OT~ER: ......... ,~ ~.~/.-. ......... of any such special assessmenls. If si.ich special assessments 57. or escrow amounts for said special assessmenls as required by Buyer's lender shall exceed $ ~ ~)O, ~ , then either 58. party may agree in wdling on or before Ihs date of closing ~o assume, pay or provide /or the payment of such excess. In the absence of 59. sucl3 agreement, either party may declare this Purchase Agreement null and void; Ihs parties shall immediately sign a canceJlalion of 60. Purclmse Agreemenl and alt earnest money paid hereunde[ shall be refunded Io Buyer. MN;PA. f (9/01) -4564- PURCHASE AGREEMENT 81, Page 2 62. TITLE & EX~,MINATION: Within a reasonable lime after acceplance of this Agreement, Seller shall pr~. 63. evidence of lille, which shall include proper searches oovering bankruptcies, stalls a~d federal Judgments and liens, 6'4. and levied and pending Special Assessmenls to Buyer or Buyer's deslgnaled lille service Provider, as [ollows: 65. I1' property Is abstract, Seller shall provide: (1) a commilmenll Ior an owner's poilcy of little insurance on a current 66. ALTA Iorm issued by an insurer licensed to write lille insurance in Minnesota. If the Seller chooses Io provide an 67. owner's policy of lille insurance ralher Ihan updale an abstract of'.[llle, Seller shall pay lhe entire premium, lille 68. examination lee and Ihs costs of evidence of lille for such lille Insurance polioy If no lender's policy is obtained; or 69. only Ihs additional cost of obtaining a simultaneously issued owners policy if a lender's policy is obtained. (Buyer 70. shall pay Ihs premium and the title examinallon fee Ior ll~e lender's policy); or (2) an abstract of lille certified Io dale. 71. If Seller chooses to updale an abslraot, Seller shall pay for all abstracltng fees. Seller shall surrender any abstracl in 72. Seller's possession or control to Buyer at closing. 73. If property Is Torrens, Seller shall provide, ai Buyer's option and request, either (1) a Registered Property Abstract 74. (RPA) certified Io dele; or (2) a commitment i`or an owner's policy ol lille insurance on a currenl ALTA Iorm issued by 75. an insurer licensed to wrile tills insurance in Minnesota. Seller shall be responsible lo pay, under ellhsr option, only 76. tl~ose coals necessary lo prepare Ihs RPA or commitment. Buyer shall, at buyer's option, pay for either Ihs AIIorney's 77. Opinion or Ihs lille insurance premium and examination fee. 78. Seller shall use Seller's best efforlls to provide markelable tittle by the dale of closing. In the event Seller lies not provided markelabl.e title by the date of closing, Seller shall have an. addilional 30. days .to make title marketable or, in 80. Ihs allernative,. Buyer may waive title defecls by Written notice Io the Seller. In addition to the 30 day extension, 81. Buyer and Seller may by mutual agreement further exllend Ihs closing date. Lacking such extension, either party 82. may declare this Purchase Agreement null and' void; neilher parly shall be liable tot damages hereunder to tile other 83. and earnest money shall be refunded lo Buyer; Buyer and Seller sllall immediately sign a cancellation of Purchase ' 84, Agreement. 85. SUBDIVISION OF LAND: It this sale constitutes or requires a subdivision of land owned by Seller, Seller shall pay 86. all subdivision expenses and obllain all necessary governmental approvals. Seller warrants the legal description 87. Ihs real property to be conveyed has been or will be approved [or recording as of Ihs dale of closing. Seller warrants 88. thall tile buildings are or will be construcled enltrely within Ihs boundary lines o! Ihs property. Seller warranls 89. thai Ihere is a right of access to the properly from a public right of way. These warranlles shall survive Ihs deliver,/ 90. the deed or contract for deed. ' 91. Seller warranlls that prior ~o the closing, payment in lull wlll have been made for all labor, malerials, machinery, 92. fixlures or lools lurnished wilhin Ihs 120 days immedialely preceding llhe closing in connection willh conslruclion, 93. alleralion or repair ol any slruclure on or improvement to the properly. 94. Seller warrants Ihal Seller has nol received any notice lrom any governmental authority as to condemnalion 95. proceedings, violation of any law,'ordinance or regulation. II tile properly is subject to reslrictive covenants, Seller 96. warranls Ihal Seller has nol received any no[ice Irom any person or aullhority as Io a breach of Ihs covenants. Any 97. sucl~ notices received by Seller will bs provided Io Buyer h"nmedialely. 98. 99. 100. 101. . 102. 103. Seller agrees Io allow reasonable access lo Ihs properly for pedormance of'any surveys or inspections agreed io herein. RISK OF LOSS: If there is any loss or damage to the properly between the data hereof and the date of closing, for any reason including fire, vandalism, flood, earlhquake or act of God, the risk of loss shall be on Seller. Ii' Ihs property is destroyed or subslanllially damaged before the closing dale, this Purchase Agreement shall become null and void, at Buyer's oplion, and earnest money shall be refunded Io Buyer; Buyer and Seller shall immedialely sign a cancelialion of Pumhase Agreement. 104. TIME OF ESSENCE: TIme is o1' tile essence in this Purchase Agreement. ' ' 105. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Purchase Agreement, any atlached exhibits and any addenda or amendmenls signed 105. by Ihs parties, shall constilule the entire agreemenll between Seller and Buyer, and supercsdes any other written or 107. oral agreements belween Seller and Buyer. This Purchase Agreement can be modified only in writing signed by 108. Seller and Buyer. All monetary sums are deemed Io be United States currency for purposes of this agreemenl. Buyer or seller may be 109. required lo pay certain closing costs which may effectively reduce tile proceeds lmm Ihs sale or increase the cash outlay at closing. 110. ACCEPTANCE: Buyer understands and agrees li3at llhis Purchase Agreement is subject to acceptance by Seller in 111. writing. Tile delivery ol all papers and monies shall be made at the listing broker's oft'ice. 112. DEFAULT: If Buyer defaulls in any of Ills agreemenls I~erein, Seller may terminate Ihls Purchase Agreement, and 113. paymenls made hereunder may be retained by Seller as liquidated damages. If this Purchase Agreemenll is not s~' 114. lermtnated, Buyer or Seller may seek actual damages for breach oi' this Agreemenll or specific performance o~ 115. Agreement; and, es lo speoli'ic performance, such action must be commenced within six months afller such rigl'~t 116. action adses. MN:PA-2 -4565- Buyer shell ps R~ORATED FROM DAY OF CLOSI~, Seller shall ~_TED TO DAY OF~ ~, ~ PURCHASE.AGREEMENT 18, Page 3 , . 12the, ALL, NONE real estate taxes due and payable in the year ~,~::~ ~.---. ALL, NONE res/estate laxes due and payable in Ihs year..~(3~"-~-i/ 119. 120. 121. closing dale ia changed, the real es~..b~ss paid shall, If prorated, be adjusted to Ihs new clcelng date. Selier warrants laxes due and 122. payable in.the year~.¢:~r~ will b~,.~,I=ART-NON..(c~=e ona,~ .. homestead classltlcellon. If part or non-ho133esteed classification Is circled, 123. Salter agrees Io pay Buyer at closing $ -- O ' 124. toward the non-homestead res/estate taxes. Buyer al;Fees Io pay any remaining balance of non-homestead taxes when they become 125. due and payable. Buyer shall pay real estate loxes due end payable in the year following dosing and thereafter, the payment of which is 126. not otherwise herein provided. No reprsaenlallons are made concernlqg the amount o1' subsequent real estate taxes. 127. POSSESSION. Seller shall deliver possession of Ihs property ecl isfer than' ~___~('~:>{. _ I~[~ D~~~(~/~_ -- ailer c,osing. 128. Ali interest, homeowner association dues, ranis, fuel oil, liquid petroleum gas and ell charges for city water, city sewer, eleclrioliy, and 129. nalurel gas shall be proreled between the parties as of date of dosing. Salter agrees Io remove ALL DEBRIS AND ALL PERSONAL 130. PROPERTY NOT INCLUDED HEREIN from the properly by possession date. 131. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS: To the best of the Seller's knowledge there are no hazardous substances, or underground storage 132. tanks, except herein noted: 133. 134. SELLERWARRANTSTHATTNE PROPERTY IS DIRECTLYCONNECTEDTO: CITY--ES [] NO /CITYWATER JS~/YES [] NO 135. SELLER / BUYER AGREES TO .... [~ a~-.- PROVIDE WATER QUALri'Y TEST RESULTS IF REQUIRED BY GO1/ERNING AUTHORITY AND/OR LENDER 136. SELLER_~¥~,I,~BUYER .... AGREES TO PROVIDE, IF REQUIRED BYTHETERMS OFTHIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT OR BY GOVERNING 137. AUTHORITY AND/OR LENDER, A LICENSED INSPECTOR'S SEPTIC SYSTEM INSPECTION REPORT OR NOTICE INDICATING IF 138. THE SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. NOTICE: A VALID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR THE 139. SYSTEM MAY SATISFYTHIS OBLIGATION. NOTHING IN LINES 136TO 139 SNALL OBLIGATE SELLER TO UPGRADE, REPAIR OR 140. REPLACE THE SEPTIC SYSTEM UNLESS OTHERWISE AGREED TO IN THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT. t 41. BUYER HAS RECEIVED THE WELL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR A STATEMENT THAT NO WELL EXISTS ON THE PROPERTY. t42. AND A SEPTIC SYSTEM DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR ~, STATEMENTTRAT NO SEPTIC SYS'rEM EXISTS ON OR SERVES THE 143. PROPERTY, AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES. 144. SELLER WARRANTS THAT CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING, HEATING, PLUMBING AND WIRING SYSTEMS USED AND LOCATED ON 145. SAID PROPERTY WILL BE IN WORKING ORDER ON DATE OF CLOSING/EXCEPT AS NOTED iN THIS AGREEMENT: 146. BUYER HAS THE RIGHT TO A WALK-THROUGH REVIEW OF THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSING TO ESTABLISH THAT THE 147. PROPERTY IS IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CONDITION AS OFTItE DATE OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT. SELLER AGREE,= 148. TO NOTIFY BUYER IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING OF ANY SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES FROM ANY PRIOR REPRESENTATION~ 149. REGARDINGTHE PHYSICAL CONDITION OFTHE PROPERTY, 150. BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT NO ORAL REPRESENTATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE REGARDING POSSIBLE PROBLEMS 151. WATER IN BASEMENT, OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY WATER OR ICE BUILD-UP ON ROOF OF THE PROPERTY AND BUYER RELIE~ 152. SOLELY IN THAT REGARD ON THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT By SELLER: 153. 154. OR ICE BUILD-UR BUYF~-'~ HAS NOT RECEIVED A SELLER'S PROPERTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. 155. BUYER HAS RECEIVEDTHE INSPECTION REPORTS, IF REQUIRED BY MUNICIPALITY. t56. 157. 158. 159. 160. t61. " ~ NOTl~sESeller's Agent/Buyer's Agenl/~ (Ll~mel ~ - -' ~ ~I .A ge n_t./_.Fa cillt aio r lOon. lay) ' THIS NOTICE DOES NOT SATISFY MINNESOTA STATUTORY AGENCY DISCLOSURE REQUIRI=MI=NTS. 162. DUAL AGENCY REPRESEN'rATION 163. PLEAS~HECK OA/£OFTHE FOLLOWING SELECTIONS 164. [] ~D:_a,. ~presentatlon D~)E'$tVOT'apply in this transaction. Disregard lines 165-178. 165. [] Dual Agency r~tallon OO~'$apply In this transacllon. Complele the disclosure in lines 166-178~ 166. Broker ?.epresanls bolh Ihe-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e~er(s) and the Buyer(s) of Ihs properly involved in Ihls transacllon,~,~,-t~'~., creates a dual agency. Thi= 167. nlesns tha. l B. roker ~ itssale~ns owe fduciary du es Io both Seller(s) and Buyer(s). Be~~ may have~c0~i~iclin 168. !nleres~nd its salesper~ons~e,,p_rollblted from advocating exclusively for either oed.v"B~ 169. transacllon~ the consehl of both Sel]'~and Buyer(s) Seltarls~ and B~ver{s/a~~ 170. ( ) con§denltal Information communfcaled'lo-"~er~whtch regards price, le~~ sell will remain confldentia 171. ~) thslructs Broke~wrlling to disc~matlon will be ~red 172. (2) B~epres~ t'r;ler~.e~',.t"-~imenl of the oth~ri-am: 175, salespersons lo act as dual agenls in this Imnsacfion. ; 176. 177. 178. I 011 - 4566- °'" FINANCING ADDENDUM CONVENTIONAL OR PRIVATELY INSURED CONVENTIONAL MORTGAGE T~I~ fomt approved by the Minnesota Aesociatk~ of REALTOR~, Which dl~Jalrrm any Ilablllly . miming out ~f Mse or mlsuee of 1hl8 form. ~2000, Ml~nne~°.~llon of REALTORS~), E~na, 1. Date. % , I _ 3. Addendum toPurchaseAgreementbetweanpartlesdate~l_ c~,!.~.~rP~ge' ,20~,3,~ pertaining to the -urcha ,-- tI - ~ - p 4: and sale of the property at 5, .: Buyer wiii appiylfor and secure et Buyer's '.se.ED CO.VE.T,O.A 7. '~(~ARM~. ~ _mortgage In the amount stated in the Purchase Agreement amo~'"~lz--ed month,~ ova---: :period o, 8. not more than_ ~ years with an initial mortgage interest rate at no more than pement per annum. g. The mortgage application IS TO BE MADE wrrHiN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS after the acceptance of this Pumhase Agreement. 10. Buyer agrees to use best efforts to secure a commitment for such financing and to execute all documents required to 11. consummate said financing. 12. FINANCING CONTINGENCY: This Agreement is contingent upon the following financing contingency. ('C'/xec.~ 13. [] If Buyer cannot secure a commitment for such mortgage, this agreement shall become null and void and earnest money 14. paid by Buyer her~in shell be retunded to Buyer; Buyer and. Seller shall immediately sign a cancellation, of Purchase iS. Agi;~ei~i'edt: 16. [] Buyer sh~]i provide Seller or Seller's Agent with a final underwriting approval commitment for the loan specified in this 17. Purchase Agr. eer~ent, including completed apPraisal, and stating all conditions required by the lender to close the loan, on or 18. beforeS, 20~_.._.~,~.. If said commitment Is not provided'by said date Seller may, at Sol ers option, declare this 19. Purchase Agreement null and void. Buyer and Ssi er shall immediately sign a cancellation of Purchase Agreement, and ail 20. earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer. 21. Upon delivery of said commitment to Keller or Seller's Agent, the responsibility for satisfying all conditions, except work 22. orders, required by said commitment is deemed accepted by the Buyer. In the event the Purchase Agreement'does not close 23. on the stated clcelng date for ANY REASON relating to financing, other than Seller's failure to complete work orders to the 24. extent required by the Purchase Agreement, including but not limited to Interest rate and discount poi,~+s, 25. if any, Seller may, at Seller's option declare this PurchaSe Agreement null and void. Buyer and Seller shall immediate' 26. a cancellation of Purchase Agreement, and all earnest money shall be forfeited to Seller as liquidated damages, or, ,. 27. alternative, Seller may seek all other remedies allowed by law. 28. PRIVATE MORTGAGE INSURANCE (PMI): PMI may be required by the lending institution. Buyer agrees to pay all subsequent 29. year's mortgage Insurance premiums as required by the lending institution. The said mortgage insurance.premium will 30. increase the mortgage amount unless pai~ in cash at closing. 31. DISCOUNT POINTS: Nothing in this Purchase Agreement shall prohibit the Buyer from paying any discount points the Buyer 32. elects to pay. If Seller elects to pay discount points, a Mortgage Discount Points Addendum must be attached. 33. LOCKING OF MORTGAGE INTEREST RATE ("PATE"): The interest rate wJ~.J~ucKecl with the lender by t't't't't't't't't'~ 34. ~ FIVE I~USlNF. SS DAYS OF i=tHAL ACC'Em'A,CE; OF'mm PURCHASE; A~FJ~IOR TO CLOSUde AS REQUIRED BY LJ~ND~ 35. LENDER COMMITMENT WORK ORDERS: No~hing in this Purchase Agreement shall be constrUed as a warranty that the 36. Seller will make repairs required by the Lender commitment. However, the Seller agrees to pay up to $ to 37. make repairs as required by the Lander commitmant, lf theLender commltmant. ~ subject to any work ordem for which the cost of 38. making said repairs Shall exceed this amount, the Ssi er shall have the following options: 39. (A) Making the necessary repairs; or 40. (S) Negotiating the cost of making said repairs with the Buyer; or 41. (C) Declaring the Purchase Agreement null and void and earnest money paid shall be refunded to the Buyer; 42. Buyer and Seller shall immediately sign a Cancellation of the Purchase Agreement, unless the Buyer provides for payment of 43. the costof said rePairs Or escrow amounts related thereto above the amount specified on line 36 of this Addendum. 44. OTHER: 45. 48. · ' ' THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDINe CONTRACT BET~EN BUYERS AND SELLERS. 49. · IFYOLI DESIRE. LEAN-4567-3 "CE,CONSULT AN APPROPRIATE PROFESSIONAL. MN:FACM (9/00). City of Mound VARIANCE APPLIC Application Fee.' $200.00 Planning Commission Date ~,,~-,_~_-.~ [~:~1(~ Case No. ~"~-- ~."~ City Council Date Distribution City Planner DNR City Engineer PARKS Public Works Other Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address ~:~.,~ ~] ~ ~.-::-_'u¢/6~ ~'L~ LEGAL Lot Block DEsc. Subdivision ~'H ~ H~c~-~O 3 ZONING DISTRICT R-I ~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 PROPER~ Name ~ H~ELC~ d RL]OC ¢~C~~R OWNER Phone (H) W~' ~5; ~ (W) (M), APPUCANT Name ,%~¢~¢ ~ L~/,~¢~ ~D~O(. THAN Address ,~~ z~,,~,~. ,,:,~r~ OWNER) Phone(H) ~'a~O~ (W)~'~O~'~G~ (M) Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes 04) No (). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. / Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Application Page 1 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4568- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (')(,). If r~o, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: Lakeside: (NSEW) (NSEW) ( N ~),/V ) (NSEW) (NSEW) : (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: REQUIRED REQUESTED (or existing) VARIANCE ff. ft. ft. ft. ff. ft. ..... 11,5 ,. ft. ft. ff. ft. ft. ft. ft. ff. ft. ft. ff. ft. .sq ft sq ft _sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ff Does the presen~t/use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ~Y~,), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape (/~ other: specify Please describe: Variance Application Page 2 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4569- Case No. 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~. If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No (')(,). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of h~which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Ye~),~o ~f no, list some other Pr0Perties which are similarly affected? u;vp ¢co PC- I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature Applicant's Signature ~-~~~.~ Vadance Application Page 3 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -4570- CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PB. OPERT¥ ADDRESS: OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA . LOT AREA LOT AREA SQ. Fl'. X 30% = (for all lots) .............. SQ: FT: "X' 40'%"-='"'-(fot'T 6'tS 0f' Ri~'%'rd*) ....... SO. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) 2.3 7~ *Existing Lots of Record may hav.¢ 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlin.ed..in Z. on!ng Ord!0a0ce Sect. ion 350. ~12.25, Subd:,6. B:. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = _ Ilb~ '!4ot/9~_., X = X = DETACHED BLDGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVE'WAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. DECKS Open decks (114" min. opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as herdcover OTHER TOTAL HOUSE TOTAL ,r;~5 rACHED BLDGS ................. X = X = TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC TOTAL DECK TOTAL OTHER X TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE UNDER / OVER (indicate differenoe.)..., ... ,','...'r ; ';....: .... ,..-. :..., ...~., ., . :......,-...... PREPARED BY ~O¢4f~E(~r· ,. ~S¢-~(..~ATE¢ D'ATE -4571 - I Z3 ,I CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) II:PI~OPER,TY ADDRESS:. 5' 17 2 7 (?)/~/¢ ¢:f'~'~~ OWNER $ NAME: ~TEVIE ~EDF. LL .. LOT AREA LOT AREA LOT AREA SO. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .............. SQ: FTT"X ' 40'%"-' = '" (for r 0tS df' R~'~b'rd*) ........ l.. SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) . . *Existing Lots of Record may havg 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlin.ed.in Z. on!ng Ordi0ance Sec.t. ion '35~_1 225,Su.bd.:.6. B.:.I. (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Off;cia!. LENGTH WIDTH SO FT HO.USE DETACHED BLDGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVE'WAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. opening between boards) with a TOTAL HOUSE X = TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS ................. X = X = TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .................. X = 14-'7 pervious surface under are not'~ounted as kardcover OTHER TOTAL DECK , . .' ....................... X TOTAL OTHER X TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE UNDER / OVER (indicate difference.)..~ ..-..-,..-.~- ;. ,.....: .... :... ~,......,~.,., ,: , .,..~-,., . , , PREPARED BY'~0Nt:3E'I~ .'~/k~O(4,~TJ~¢' DATE -4572- 14'7 City of Mound WAIVER OF PLATTING APPLICATION City Council Date: .~:~ ~)r i4 Application Fee: $50 Distribution: City Planner DNR Public Works Parks City Engineer Other Escrow Deposit:S200.00 Case No. Deficient Unit Charges? Delinquent Taxes.'? Variance Required? Please type or print clearly PROPEP, TY EXISTING Lot(s) [ 'f'L..~ Block ~' S ubdivisio n"T~"/~_. ~.-~r~:~-- j~/D~ LEGAL ~sc.,.,o. ~,~ ~-!1~-~-~-~~ ~,~,~ ~.o~os~ ~. ~o~(~) LEGAL DESC~PTION B. Lot(s) O,rc,.: PROPER~ Are there existing structures on the prope.? ~ / no Do the existing structures ~mply with the zoning ordinance for setbacks, hardcover, etc.? ~ / no APPLICANT The applicant is: owner ~ Name OWNER Name ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~,~~ (if other than applicant) Address SURVEYO~ Name Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject p~operty, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the Information provided and that I am responsible for all costs Incurred by the City related to the processing of this application consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant Signature C'~'qx/~, ~ ~ Date Revised 03/20/02 -4573- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- A RESOLUTION TO DENY THE REQUEST FROM TIM BECKER AND DALE AND LORELL BECKER TO REZONE LOTS 5-8, BLOCK 4, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-lA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL P & Z CASE # 02-26 PID # 13-117-24-22-0046 PID # 13-117-24-21-0050 PID # 13-117-24-21-0051 PID # 13-117-24-22-0052 WHEREAS, the applicant, Tim Becker and Dale and Lorell Becker, has requested that Lots 5-8, Block 4, Replat of Harrison Shores, Hennepin County, Minnesota be rezoned from R-1 Single-Family Residential to R-lA Single Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the property is currently zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential District and subject to the provisions of City Code Chapter 350:620 Subd. 2; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a public hearing held on August 5, 2002 and unanimously recommended that the Council deny the rezoning application; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the request at a public hearing held on August 27, 2002 and unanimously recomlnended denial of the rezoning application mad requested that City staff a prepare a resolution denying the application for rezoning for review and consideration at the September 9, 2002 meeting and also directed City staffto execute a 60-day extension on the rezoning request pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby deny the rezoning request based on the following findings of fact: The subject property is surrounded on the east side, west side and south side by R-1 Single-Family Residential. -4574- The minimum lot size requirement of the R-lA Single-Family Residential District is inconsistent with the neighborhood. There was no mistake in the original zoning of the property. Additionally, no evidence was provided by the applicant that indicated that a mistake was made in the original zoning. There is no change in the conununity or neighborhood that necessitate the need for rezoning of the property. The purpose for the R-lA District is for areas that have been historically platted with small lots. AT the time the subject property was platted, the lots were much larger than the minimums of the R-lA District and more closely resembled the minimums of the R-1 District. Three (3) of the four (4) lots exceeded the R-1 District's 10,000 square foot minimum as platted, the fourth is within (52) square feet of the minimum. The information contained in the rezoning application dated July 5, 2002 expressed that the reason for the application was because of the erosion that had occurred on the subject property thereby reducing the lot area. Rezoning the property to R-lA would provide benefits to the property beyond the detriments suffered by erosion and would allow greater flexibility with setbacks and would also create the risk of additional infill development due to the substantially reduced lot size requirements. This additional development creates the potential for negative impacts to wetland and floodplain areas on the property. Keeping current R- 1 District zoning provides a greater opportunity to reduce the environmental impacts that result from development of the property. 2. This rezoning application is denied for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Lots 5-8, Block 4, Replat of Harrison Shores, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember and The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted September 24, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: City Clerk -4575- 5341 Maywood R. oad Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff Sarah Smith, Community Development Director September 16, 2002 Anthony's Floral - 1861 Commerce Boulevard SUMMARY As requested by the City Council at its August 27, 2002 meeting, City staffmet with Anthony and Eva Vanversteeg, owners of Anthony's Floral, on September 3, 2002 to discuss their current business operations as well as their future plans for the property. As the City Council is aware, earlier this year, the City intitated a proposal to rezone the current property from B-2 Business to R-3 Residential. The proposal would also change the future use of the property from medium to high density residential. The purpose for the proposed rezoning and comprehensive plan amendments is to ensure consistency between the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. DISCUSSION POINTS 1. The property owners indicated that the listing agreement with ReMax Real Estate was extended in June / July and runs for another two (2) years. 2. They plan to continue their current floral business as long as possible and commented that they have considered expanding their operations to that of a "garden center". They have researched the possibility of relocating their business to other locations in the community. They feel strongly that Anthony's Floral will always remain in the City of Mound. They have had preliminary discussions with a developer regarding phasing the redevelopment of their property. If possible, they may wish to pursue development of the east side of the property which would allow them to maintain their current business operations. 5. The Vandersteegs seemed to prefer to maintain their existing zoning of B-2 but further expressed willingness to work with the City. -4576- 6. The Vandersteegs were invited to attend the September 24, 2002 City Council meeting and commented that they would try to attend. -4577- Excerpts from the MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 27, 2002 DISCUSSION ON PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ZONING AMENDMENTS AND OVERVIEW FROM PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Loren Gordon explained that staff and the Planning Commission have been working on the City's Land Use Plan and Zoning Maps over the past few months, and the proposed revisions are needed to comply with state statutes that ~state that the Zoning Map shall be consistent with the Land Use Plan. There are numerous parcels under consideration for rezoning and the question is whether to consider them all at one time or separate the two areas that there seem to be of concern to residents. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to initiate the rezoning process for all properties except where Anthony's Floral is located, and the Chateau properties. All voted in favor. Motion carried. There was input from property owners living in the Dutch Lake vicinity, expressing concern over the future use of the Anthony's property and its impact on the lake. The neighborhood group would like to be involved in future discussions regarding this topic. John Dean expressed that there may be legal issues if the zoning is changed now to make the existing use nonconforming. Discussion followed regarding possible solutions and combinations of zoning designations. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to reconsider their previous motion. Those voting in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. Those voting against: Meyer. Motion carried. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to bring all of the parcels in the proposed Zoning Map/Comprehensive Plan revisions, with the exception of the Anthony's Floral property, to public hearing for further evaluation and consideration. Those voting in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. Those voting against: Meyer. Motion carried. M,at~yor Meisel stated that the Anthony's Floral property would be put on the September 24 agenda for further discussion, and directed staff to contact the property owner for his input, and invite him to the meeting, along with the Dutch Lake neighborhood group. 1 -4578- Excerpts from the MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 13, 2002 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA John Hubler, 5816n Grandview, presented a letter to the Council from Citizens Concerned for Dutch Lake (CCDL) Association. This is in reference to a proposed rezoning issue that will be discussed at a later Council meeting. David Bond, 6048 Aspen, expressed concern over the proposed development along Dutch Lake, stating he and neighbors are opposed to the proposed zoning change. 1 -4579. Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: '*'~; ............. Y'"'7~ ................... .!.:;2<'...': i...- ................ : .............................................. HOUSE or BUILDING #: STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters) i Commerce Blvd UNIT # (if applicable) ~ records per page Hennepin County, MN Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9.' l S p.m. (CST) Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax Statement ¥'~*'0~'~?".-".':.~.~ ~i~I ?~-'-.":*-"~ ~>.'* i~i ~?~::~:?:t!? 14-117-24-14-0004 1861 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND 277 Construction year: 1950 3 Parcel Size: IRREGUL/ ANTONIE VAN DERSTEEG ETAL ANTHONY VANDERSTEEG 1861 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description UNPLATTED 14 117 24 COM ATA PT IN E LINE OF GOVT LOT 1 DIST215.05 FT S FROM NE COR THEREOF TH W PAR WITH N LINE THEREOF 438.02 FT TH N 15.01 FT TH W Note: This is a Partial Metes & Bounds Descript Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $235,400 $178,000 $178,000 $2,923.73 $696.54 $33.91 $3,654.18 http://www2, co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresull- 4580- 9/16/2002 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 2 of 2 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Values: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status 1 2 $86,200 $30,000 $104,200 $15,000 $190,400 $45,000 $60,200 $30,000 $72,800 $15,000 $133,000 $45,000 1 2 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL HOMESTEAD NON- HOMESTEAD 352.3 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to co Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati. Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresult- 4581 - ~, - 9/16/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hermepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Property ID 14-117-24-14-0004 Property Address 1861 CO}~RCE BLVD MOUND, MN 55364 Last upda~: 0~04~002 at 1:00:00 PM Approximate Property Perimeter 1,619 ff. Market Value Approximate Property Area 128,097 sq.ff. = 2.941 acres Total Tax (2002) $ 235,400 $ 3,654.18 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected ~.~i:: '-'::¢,~.?~ ¥:i% ;i:~::~: :~':'~/:' ~ :~ ~:: ~:~i ~.~ ~':~,i ¢ii~ This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder~.co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and Ds best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http://wwwl 9. co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrimr_--4~g~~ 2me=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALU... 9/16/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: ! Prop,.rty ~D Property ID: ...... Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Hermepin County, Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9.'] 5 p.m. (CST) Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax Statement 14-117-24-14-0003 85 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MOUND 277 Construction year: 3 Parcel Size: IRREGULA A & E VAN DER STEEG ANTONIE VAN DER STEEG 1860 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description UNPLATTED 14 117 24 COM AT A PT IN E LINE OF GOVT LOT 1 DIS 10 RODS S OF NE COR THEREOF TH S ALONG SAID E LINE 50.05 FT TH W PAR WITH N LINE THOF DIST 438.02 FT Note: This is a Partial Metes & Bounds Descripti Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $65,000 $63,900 $63,90O $846.97 $12.17 $859.14 http ://www2. co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult..:£~l~Z 1411724140003 9/16/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 200'1 Values: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $65,000 $65,000 $63,900 $63,900 VACANT LAN D RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD 2077 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cor Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicatic Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us · .::~:.:..:~ :::i ,::~.:....~.:::. :.:: · =.:,t..';.'.~..~--.:~:~f ....:;~;~::.;..~-::::: ::'~.::.<::.-.'.:-:r~:;:.~..::: ::~ ::..::..'.:::::.:::. ::::: :: ~:.'i;:;i:::;i :! Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http ://www2. co. hennepin.mn.us/pi n s/pi dre.sult~ ,4584-1411724140003 9/16/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of I Hennepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Property ID 14-117-24-14-0003 Property Address ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MOUND, MN 0 Lastupda~:O~O4~OO2atl:OO:OOPM Approximate Property Perimeter 2,830 fl. Market Value $ 65,000 Approximate Property Area 176,598 sq.ff.= 4.054 acres Total Tax (2002) $ 859.14 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected ~.:: ~i.i :'i: i~: ~i ~: ~:: :i i;:!':~: ~ili:~'. 'i~, i: ~:~ ~i:~i~:': 2:i ~, ~,;: %.? This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348~2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moutder(~,co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http ://www 19. co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrim~_,,z~g~_rne=Hennepin&cmd=Find& VALU... 9/16/2002 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 16, 2002 SUBJECT: Request for waiver of platting approval to subdivide Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition from the Balboa property and creation of new tax identification number for the parcel to be sold to the City of Mound. APPLICANT: City of Mound (buyer) / Balboa Center Limited Partnership (current property owner / seller) PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-35 LOCATION: 5300 Shoreline Drive PID: 13-117-24-34-0100 ZONING: I-A Planned Industrial Area (PIA) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial SUMMARY The City Council will review a request for "waiver of platting" approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition from the Balboa property located at 5300 Shoreline Drive. As the City Council is aware, the City of Mound has signed an Option Agreement with Balboa Center Limited Partnership to buy Lots 23-28 which are located at the most western area of the Balboa property along Lynwood Boulevard and will be used to accommodate the new MCES lift station and Xcel substation that necessary for the CSAH 15 construction project. SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 330:12 states that any parcel of land, either platted or unplatted that has been combined for tax purposes or other reasons, cannot be re-separated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of the subdivision ordinance. A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City Council after receipt of the background information provided by City staff. The waiver of platting and release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be in compliance with all City codes. The City may impose conditions to the waiver. Applications for waiver of platting do not require review by the Planning Commission but may be remanded by the City Council if it is determined that their advice will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. -4586- BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property Tax Status. According to Hennepin County property tax records, the Balboa property is considered to be one parcel and covered by one property identification description (# 13-117- 233-34-0100.) Option Agreement. At its August 27, 2002 meeting, the City Council authorized the execution of the Option Agreement with Balboa Center Limited Partnership dated May 28, 2002 for the purchase of Lots 23-28. Section 6.5 of the Option Agreement provides that the City shall obtain and deliver to Balboa on or prior to closing, approval from the City of Mound of a tax parcel division creating a property tax identification number for Lots 23-28. Closing. Upon approval of the waiver by the City Council, the City is scheduled to close on the property on September 25, 2002. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map included in the Mound Comprehensive Plan guides the property for future industrial use. Zoning. The subject property is zoned I-1 Planned Industrial Area and subject to the requirements of City Code Chapter 350:680. Business operations at Balboa are regulated by a Conditional Use Permit (#85-87) that has undergone a number of revisions over the years as new businesses have located in the center. The removal of Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition will not violate any condition of the CUP or violate any provision of the Mound Zoning Code that might deem the property to be non-conforming. Essential service buildings are allowed in all districts upon approval of a conditional use permit but are not subject to the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Electrical substations are allowed by conditional use in the I-1 District. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Information regarding the waiver was forwarded to all involved City departments for review and comment. Please refer to the memorandum from City Planner Loren Gordon dated September 16, 2002 regarding the land use issues associated with the request. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. No construction is contemplated as part of the current waiver application. Release of the subject lots from the Balboa property holding does not violate any condition of the master plan or any provision of the Zoning Ordinance that might deem the remaining property to be non-conforming. 2 -4587- No future approval of any development plan, land use application and/or building permit is included as part of this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the City Council approve the waiver of platting request to subdivide Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition from the Balboa property located at 5300 Shoreline Drive subject to the following conditions: 1. Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition shall be assigned a new tax identification number by Hennepin County. 2. The remaining Balboa property shall retain the existing tax identification number from Hennepin County. 3 -4588- MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. lt'4H To.' From: Date: Subject: Balboa Property File - 5300 Shoreline Drive Loren Gordon, City Planner September 16, 2002 Release of Balboa Business Center Property 5300 Shoreline Drive, Mound, Minnesota The City of Mound is presently reviewing the feasibility of locating public infrastructure projects on a portion of land currently held by Balboa Minnesota Co. The property is addressed as 5300 Shoreline Drive and is held as a single parcel. The site under current consideration includes Lots 23 - 28 of Koehler's Addition to Mound which is located at the most western area of the Balboa property having frontage along Lynwood Blvd. The site is currently being evaluated to accommodate three (3) upcoming projects: 1) a grit chamber to accommodate stormwater; 2)a MCES lif~ station; and 3) a future Xcel Energy substation. Balboa Center Zoning The Balboa Center is currently zoned as Planned Industrial Area (PIA) and is controlled by a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) which regulates the activities identified in the master development plan. The master development plan was established with the adoption of Resolution No. #85-87 and has undergone a number of revisions over the years as new businesses have located in the center. The central question of the use / sale of Lots 23 - 28 are conditions established by the masterplan for the property. One of the many conditions in the Resolution No. #85-87 is parking for the site. Exhibit 1 of the Resolution identifies the location and number of parking and loading spaces. That parking plan does not include Lots 23 - 28. Toro operated in the Balboa Center for a number of years and underwent operational changes that required CLIP revisions. One of which is Resolution #87-145 which allowed a trailer parking area on the lots under consideration. While Toro was in operation, this area was used for trailer parking but since Toro pulled its operations from Balboa, there area has not been utilized by any other business. At present, the approved CLIP allowing trailer parking remains in effect for the property. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Mi]meapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -4589- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE WAIVER OF PLATTING TO SUBDIVIDE LOTS 23-28, KOEHLER'S ADDITION FROM THE BALBOA PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5300 SHORELINE DRIVE AND CREATE A NEW TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR THE PARCEL TO BE SUBDIVIDED AND SOLD TO THE CITY OF MOUND PID # 13-117-24-34-0100 PLANNING CASE # 02-35 WHEREAS, the applicants, Balboa Center Limited Partnership (current owner / seller) and the City of Mound (buyer) Steve and Lynn Bedell (buyer) and Charles and Alice Macnamara (seller) have requested waiver of platting approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition from the Balboa property located at 5300 Shoreline Drive; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned I-A Planned Industrial Area; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has executed an Option Agreement to purchase Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition which will be used to accommodate the new MCES lift station and Xcel substation that are necessary for the CSAH 15 construction project; and WHEREAS, Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition, is currently vacant and meets the lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition are platted lots and were combined previously by a former owner; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 330:12 states that a waiver of platting request may be granted by the City Council if it is determined that the proposal is in compliance with all City codes; and -4590- THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the waiver of platting request subject to the following conditions: a. Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition shall be assigned a new tax identification number by Hennepin County. b. The remaining Balboa property shall retain the existing tax identification number from Hennepin County. 2. This waiver of platting request is hereby approved for the following described property: See Exhibit A and Exhibit B The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted September 24, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -4591 - EXHIBIT A PROPOSED LEGAL - DESCRIPTION OF TAX PARCEL Par 1 Lots I to 2t inclusive, eno ..... most Westerly comer of Block 9 to the point Of That ~art o'~ Lots ;22 and 2:3 lying Southwesterly et ~ line drawn from [he intersection with the $o~ltheaSterly line of Blor.,k 1 't, with a line drawn parallel ko arid 40 Peet t~loHharly, measured at right angles, from the Southerly llne of Block t J and its extensio . 'Alt in Block 1 t, "Abraham LirtGoIn Addition to Lakeside Park. Mound. Minnetonka". ~v~ ion Number t70. Hennepin County, Mirmesota and that Dart of the Par 3. That part of Lot 36, Auditor's Subd' 's ......... '-:- `1 t7 ~nae 24. all described as beginning at a Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section ~.~,/ow,~,,,~ ..... I:)olnt on the North line of said Lot 36. distant 25 feet West from the Northeast corner thereof, which point is marked by a Judicial Landmark set i~ursuant to Torrens Case No. -15078: thence East to the Northeast comer of said Lot 36. which point is marked by a Judicial Landmarks set pursUant to To,rerts Case No. 115002; thence South along the East line of said Lot 36 and its extension to an intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 33 feet Southerly from the Southerly line of said Lot 36; thence WesteHy along the last described parallel line to Its Intersection with a line drawn South, parallel to the East tine of said Lot 36 and Its extension from the point of beginning: thence North along said last described parallel line 34.'15 feet to e point marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 15078; thence continuing North along said last described line, 1~_t .9 feet. to the point of beginning. Par 4. Lots 1 to 1 t Inclusive, Block 5: Lots t to 7 inclusive, Block 6; That part of Lot 8 lying Easterly of a llne thereof, distant t 34.~ feet Westerly All of Yost Street, vacated, lying I~lock 6 and a tine drawn from the All in SylVBn Heights Addition to M~.' d-M Per 5: That part o~ Lot 8, Block 6, Minnesota described es follows: Landmark set 13ursuant to Torrens ~ which is 134.4 feet pursuant to Torrens Case No. `1 said Lot 8, which point is marked by Northwesterly along the South line pursuant to Torrens Case No. which is marked by a Judicial Landmark along sa,d 6outh line to the West line of said' ~0.t4 feet SoUth of the Northwest comer of . from a l:)olnt on the Northerly li~e ,.~ ~. lines of Lots t to 6 inclusive. of Lot ~ 1, Block 5, Hennepin County, ma~ked by a Judicial Lot 8, 368.35 feet to a point by a Judicial Landma~'k set ~ feet to the SoUth line of Io. '15805; thence Westerly and f a Judicial Landmark set line, 162 58 feet, to a point continuing Northwesterly llr~e or s~id Lot 8 to a point which is a Judk;;ial Landmark set Dursant to ' ';h; -,' zt0.14 feet to the point of beginning. Torrens Case No. 16002: thence continuing Northe ~10 ~.s e Par 6: That l~art of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 13, Township 117. Range 24 described as Auditor's Subdivision Number 170. Henl~eDin County, Minnesota, said point beginning ,at t,h,e No ,rth?,a?_t, c, or_~n~er ?.~o.L~3~Jrsuant to Torrens Case No. 16002; thence ,W, es_._terly al°~g..t.he~°~hnli_/n~ of being marKe0 oya JUmC~a, t.a-u,,,,=,_,, _~_~,~ ~. icial Landmark set 13ursuant to I orrens said Lot 36. a distance of 25 feet to a po,hi marked by a Jud . thence North parallel with the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the point of intersection of said Lot 36, said ~oint with a line ,~0 feet Northerly of, measured at a right angle to and parallel with the Northerly line of intersectlop being marked (l~lYs~aJn~de'~l~;da[nt~r~h;e;o~ot~;~tln~etr~eT~;~e:wSl s~ ~n~e0~ last described parallel line, a of the SoUthwest Quarte~, said 13oint of Intersection being marked by a Judicial Landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No, ~6002; thence South along said East line to the point of beginning. Par 7: Lots ~0 to 14 inclusive; and That part et Lot 15 lying North of the South 8 feet thereof, Ail In Block 2, L,P, Crevier's Subd~vislon of part of Lot 36, Lafayette Park; Par 8; All of Block 4, e~ce~t the Southerly 300 feet thereof and a×ce~t that part of the West ~.~,3.3 feet thereof lying North o~ the South 453.36 feet thereof and except the East 225.00 feet thereof, Shirley Hills, Unit Par g: Lots {5 through 7 inclusive, Block 3, ~ -4592 All that Dart of the adjoining vacated alley lying West of the center hne thereof and between the extensions across it of the Northerly line of said Lot 5 and the North Ilne of the South t0 feet of said Lot 5. Shirley Hills. Unit F. -4593- EXHIBIT B PROPO.~ED LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR NEW TAX PARCEL Par 2: Lots :23 to 28 inclusive. "Koehler's Addition To Mound" Lake Minnetonka. -4594- ,.17.4 PARI* O~ ~ ~8. . 174, BAS ]O ~¢'~ l A NOBLE LA -4595-; Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: Property ID: Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Hennepin County, Property Information Search Result The Hennep~n County Property Tax web database is ~tpdated daily (Monday - Friday) at ap?roximately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 13-117-24-34-0100 5300 SHORELINE DR MOUND 277 Construction year: 19t50 3 Parcel Size: IRREGULA BALBOA MINNESOTA CO BALBOA MINNESOTA CO C/O UNITED PROPERTIES 3500 80TH ST W BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description SYLVAN HEIGHTS ADDN TO MOUND LOTS 1 THRU 11 INCL BLK 5 AND LOTS 1 THRU 8 INCL BLK 6 ALL IN SYLVAN- HEIGHTS ADDN TO MOUND ALSO LOTS 10 THRU 15 INCL BLK 2 IN L P CREVIERS Note: This is a Partial Metes & Bounds Descripti Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $4,750,000 $4,750,000 $4,750,000 $182,372.37 $905,35 $183,277.72 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 http ://www2. co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult..;_~oS~Ll 311724340100 9/16/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Values: Land Market $1,000,000 Building Market $3,750,000 Machinery Market Total Market: $4,750,000 ' Land Limited $1,000,000 Building Limited $3,750,000 Total Limited: $4,750,000 Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status INDUSTRIAL NON- HOMESTEAD 916 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cot Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don.Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati¢ Send e-mail to Henn.Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County -4597- 911612002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 09/04/2002 at 1:00:00 PM Approximate Approximate Property ID Property Perimeter Property Area 13-117-24-34-01 O0 6,779 ft. 635,606 sq.ft. = 14.592 acres Property Address b{arket Value Total Tax (2002) 5300 SHORELINE DR MOUND, MN 55364 $ 4,750,000 $ 183,277.72 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder(~,co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Intemet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http ://www 19. co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrime~4~g~§ ~_me=Hennepin&cmd=Find& VALU... 9/16/2002 Z r~, 0 o~ Z m o z ~ X ~ ~0 Z o ~ ~mm 0 o ~ ~0~ ~ Z o ~ 0~ o · 0~ ~ o o ~0~ Z O~ ~ ~ N ~xm m~H ~ Z~ HH zmo ~ z O0 ~0 ~m ~o~ Z ~,, -I m mm,,4 Engineering · Planning o Surveying September 19, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound West Edge Boulevard Street Improvements Preliminary Assessment Roll MFRA #7827 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: As requested, we submit herewith the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the West Edge Boulevard Street Improvement Project. The amount to be assessed has been calculated as follows: Construction Cost Contract $ 211,027.75 Change Order No. 1 $ 1,828.50 Revised Contract Amount $ 212,856.25 Minus Water Service (Water Fund) $ 751.25 Subtotal $ 212,105.00 Contingency (3%) $ 6,400.00 Total Construction Cost $ 218,505.00 Engineering, Staking, Inspection, and Assessment Roll Preparation $ 65,600.00 Legal, Fiscal, and Administrative Cost $ 7,800.00 Total Project Cost $ 291,905.00 Please note that a three percent contingency has been included in the construction costs to cover any extra work that may be required. This project is still under construction; however we hope to have substantial completion by the time the assessment hearing is held on October 22. The final numbers can be adjusted down at that time, if the contingency is not required. The amount of the proposed assessment cannot be increased after the legal notices are published and mailed to the property owners. 15050 23rd Avenue North o Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-maih mfra@mfra, com -4600- Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council September 19, 2002 Page 2 The total mount to be assessed has been spread as follows: Assessment Spread City Share (15%) Rottlund Homes (75%) Mound Properties (10%) $ 43,785.75 $ 218,928.75 $ 29,190.50 Cost Per Langdon Bay Lot $218,928.75 + 74 lots = $ 2,958.50/lot Cost Per Mound Parcel $29,190.50 + 6.5 Parcels = $ 4,490.85/unit The developer of"Langdon Bay" had previously signed a Consent and Waiver Agreement, which allows the City to assess 75 percent of the cost of the street improvements to the Rottlund Development. The attached assessment roll has spread the 75 percent ($218,928.75) equally between the 74 lots or $2,958.50 per lot. The City of Mound had previously indicated the City's share would be 15 percent or $43,785.75. This leaves ten percent or $29,190.50 to be assessed to the benefiting property adjacent to the improvements. The City's present assessment policy uses a formula that includes a unit charge in additional to area and frontage. Since the abutting properties on this project are very similar in size and frontage, it is being suggested to assess only on a unit basis. One parcel has frontage on the project, but takes access from County Road 15; therefore it is suggested they be assessed one-half of a unit. The proposed per unit assessment is $4,490.85. The Feasibility Report prepared in September 2000 and revised February 20, 2001 showed a total estimated project cost of $209,900. This project was bid in June of 2001 and again in February of this year. This year's bid was slightly lower, however as noted, the total project cost is substantially higher than the cost projected in the Feasibility Report. The Feasibility Report indicated a proposed assessment of $2,127 per Langdon Bay lot and $3,816 per abutting parcel. If you have any questions or need additional information on anything in the assessment roll, please contact us. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:pry sSmain:XlVlou07827:\Corrcspondenc¢\mayorg- 17 -4601 - 0000 ~ ~ ~ O00000000000000000000000 0000000 o o o oo~oo8~o888o~~~o~~o~o88~88~ o 9 °°°9°°999°°°°°°°°q°°°°9q999oo77 Z WWW~ Z Z ZZZW ~ ~ O00Q 0 0 zzz~ ~ ~ 000 ~ ~ ~W ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ_ ~~¥~~ooooooooooooooooooo~zz Ozzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzm~O ~~ ZZZ -~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ooooooooooo~oooooo~ .~oo ~ 8 ~ oo ~SSSSSSSS~~ °SSSSS 00~ ~ ~~ SSS S 93 oo <~<~ooooooooosssSS~S~S~SSSSS55SSS~S ZZZZ Z Z ~0ooo o o Z ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ 0 0000000000000000000000000000000 mmmrn rn __~ rn WWWW UJ m W WWWW W W WWWW w p- Z w ~~~~ WWWWWWWW ~~~~0000000 ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 83SSSSSSSSS'SSSSSSSSSSSSSS3SSSSS WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW~WWW~WWWWW~WWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW -4602- 0 0 DDDDDDDDD~DDDDDDDDDDD~DDDDDDD 00000000000000000000000000000 ~~~~~zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ~zzzzzzzzzzzooooooooooooooooo OOOOOOOOOOO~~~~~~ ~~o~o~Go~zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ZZZZZ~ ZZ~Z~Z ~ooooooooo~~~ 5555 0000~~ ~~~ZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZoooo 000000000~~ ZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ DDDDDDDDDDDDD OOOOOOOOOOOOO DDDDDDDDD~DDDD ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd ZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ~ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ E -4603- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TOBE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON WESTEDGE BOULEVARD PROJECT WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the improvement of Westedge Boulevard from Hennepin County Road 15 to Woodedge Road, and the contract price for such improvement is $211,027.75, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $80,877.25 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $291,905.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $43,785.75 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $248,119.25. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of__ years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2003, and shall bear interest at the rate of__ percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in her office for public inspection. 4. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of September, 2002. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -4604- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR WESTEDGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, by resolution passed by the Council on September 24, 2002, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Westedge Boulevard from County Road 15 to Woodedge Road, and WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in her office for public inspection, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: A hearing shall be held on the 22nd day of October, 2002, in the City Hall at 7:30 p.m., to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the Laker at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative. The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 24th day. of September, 2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -4605- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff Sarah Smith, Community Development Director September 16, 2002 City Code Chapter 1000 -Nuisance Ordinance SUMMARY As requested by the City Council at its September 9, 2002 meeting, a "strike-out / underlined" version of the proposed new draft of the Nuisance Ordinance has been prepared and been included in the agenda packet. Additionally, Craig Mertz, the principal writer of the new document will be present to explain the various changes that have been made. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the proposed new draft of the Nuisance Ordinance. -4606- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612)975-9963 (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11:10/ST. 11:10/'NO. 3760007753 FAX TRANSMISSION CHADWICK AND MERT~ P.S.C. ~00 W. 79TH ST., P.O.Box 623 95Z-975~960 To: Sarah J. Smith Fax #: 952-472-0620 From: Craig M. Mertz Subject: Nuisance Ordinance Date: September 17, 2002 Pages: 1, including this cover sheet. COMMENTS or MESSAGE: Per your request I am sending a copy of the proposed nuise, uc~ ordinance amendments as ~ey left my office last May (see my letter of 05/22/02 addressed to you), and I have marked provisions which represent changes of the text in the current version of Section 1000 of the Mound City Code. If you have any questions or if all pages are not received, please call 952-975-9960. PLEASE DELIVER TI:HR _TR~AN5 _M'I_ TTAL A_~ SOON AS RECEIVF~YL FAX COVER NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY The information contained in ~ facsimile message is intended oaly for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipients named above. This message may be attorney- client communication, and as such ts privileged and confldelttinL If the reader of this message iz not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have regeived this document in error, and that any review, disaemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify uS immediately by telephone and return the original message to us by mail at our expense. Thank you. Original document ~ will/~ will not follow. -4607- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612) 975-9963 (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11 :ll/ST, 11:10/NO, 3760007753 P 2 Mound City Code Section 1000:00 CHAPTER V, NUISANCES SECTION 1000 - Nuisances - Abatement Section 1000:00. public Nuisance Defined. Whoever by his or her act or failure to perform a legal duty does any of the follow is guilty of maintaining a public nuisance, which is a misdemeanor: (a) Maintains or permits a condition which unreasonable annoys, injures, or endangers the safety, health, morals, corn.fort, or repose of any considerable number of members of the public, or (b) Interferes with, obstructs, or renders dangerous for passage, any public property, public highway or right-of-way use, or waters used by the public, or (c) Is guilty of any other act or omission declared by law or this Section to be a public nuisance and for which no s~tence is specifically provided. (d) Permits or allows real property under his/her control or ownership to be used tox'~ {4~vJ maintain a public nuisance. Sections 1000:05, 1000:10, and 1000:15 relating to nuisances and abatement are hereby repealed in their entirety. (Ord. #29-1989 - 06-26-89). Section 1000:02. DEFrl'xrlTIONS. The following words, when used in this ordinance, shall have the meanings ascribed to them: Garbage includes all putrescible animal, vegetable or other matter that attends the ·prep. aratiorh consumption, display, dealing in or storage of meat, fish, fowl, birds, fruit, vegetables, including the cans, containers or wrappers wasted along with such materials. Rubbish is noi~putrescible solid wastes such as wood, leaves, trimmings from shambs, dead trees or branches thereof, shavings, sawdust, excelsior, wooden waste, printed matter, paper, paper board, paste boards, grass, rags, straw, boots, shoes, hats and all other combustibles not included under the term garbage. Section 1000:05A. P_uh!ie~Nuisa_nce.q_A_ff~.ting Heai._th. The following are he'reby declared to be public nuisances affecting health: (a) Carcasses of animals not buried or destroyed within 24 hours after death; -4608- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612) 975-996B (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11:11/ST. 11:10/NO. B760007753 P 3 (b) The keeping of any animal over s~x (6) months of age which has not been vaccinated against rabies with an approved vaccine as determined by the official Comprehendium of Animal Rabies Vaccines published by the Conference of State Public Health Veterinarians and the Center for Disease Control of the Department of Health and Human Services. (c) All public exposure of persons having a communicable disease as defined in Minn. Stat. Section 144.4172 and any building, conveyance, or place where contagion, infection, filth or other source of cause of communicable disease exists; (d) Accumulations of stagnant water, manure, animal feces, or rubbish which are likely to become breeding places for flies, mosquitoes, or vermin; (e) (0 Depositing manure upon any city street, city sidewalk, or city property. Garbage not stored in rodent free and fly-tight containers, or; garbage stored so as to emit foul and disagreeable odors, or; garbage ~tored so a, to constitute a hazard to public health. (g) Accumulations of rubbish as defined herein. (h) Accumulation of junk, disused furniture, appliances, machinery, automobiles, and parts thereof or any matter which may become a harborage for rats, snakes, or vermin, which creates a visual blight, or which may be conducive to fire, or which endangers the comfort, repose, health, safety or welfare of the public. Section 1000:10A, public Nui.qan_ces Affemtln_f_M'nra!.q _~nd D_eceney. The following are hereby declared to be public nuisances affecting public morals and decency: (a) (b).. All gambling devices., slot machines and punch boards, unless approved as a legal device by the State of Minnesota; Betting, bookmaking, and all apparatus used in such occupations; (c) All hou,~e-q kept for the purpose ofprostitution or promiscuous sexual intercourse, gam;oi[ng houses, houses of ill fame, and bawdy hours; (d) All places where controlled substances, narcotics or intoxicating liquor is manufactured or disposed of in violation of law or where, in violation of law, persons are permitto_.d to resort for the purpose ofdrinking intoxicating liquor or use of controlle..d substances or nar¢otiea, or where intoxicating liquor, controlled substances, or narcotics are kept for sale or other disposition in violation of law, and all liquor controlled substances, and narcotics and other property used for maintaining such a place; -4609- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612) 975-996B (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11:11/ST. 11:10/NO, B760007753 P 4 Any vchiclc used For the transportatior~ of intoxicating liquor, or for promiscuous sexual intercourse, or any other immoral or illegal purpose; (f) The use of any fish house, warming house, or other similar struclure for any activity listed in (a) through (d) above. (g) Any building or premises to which there has been three or more police responses in a six month period (1) regarding illegal possession, and/or illegal consumption, and/or illegal sale of alcohol, or controlled substances, or (2) regarding noisy parties or noisy gatherings when disturb the peace, quiet, or repose of another person, or (3) regarding illegal discharge of fireworks and/or firearms. Section 1000:15A Public Nuisances Affecting. peace and Safety. The following are declared to be public nuisances affecting public peace and safety. (a) (b) All snow and ice not removed from public sidewalks 12 hours after the snow or other precipitation causing the-condition has ceased to fall. All wires and limbs of trees or bushes/which are so cJ.o~e to the surface of a sidewalk or street as to constitute a da'-'~"~-'~'~nger to ped~fians or vehicles, any limbs or bushes which block the clear view of traffic sig~ and all limbs of trees closer to the street surface than 15 feet and all limbs of tress closer to the surface ora sidewalk than eight feet, (c) Obstructions and excavations affecting the ordinary use by the public of streets, alleys, sidewalks, or puhlic grounds except under such conditions as are permitted by the Section or other applicable law; (d) Radio aerials, radio towers, television antennae, television towers or satellite dishes erected or maintained in a dangerous manner; (e) Any use ofproperty abutting on a public street or sidewalk or any use ora public street or sidewalk which causes large crowds of people to gather, obstructing traffic and the free uses ofthe streets or sidewalks; (i3 All h .arising signs, awnings, and other similar structures over streets and sidewalks 'so situated so as to endanger public safety, or not constructed and maintained as provided by this Section; (g) The allowing ofrain water, ice, or snow to fall from any building or structure upon any street or sidewalk or to flow across any sidewalk; (h) Waste water cast upon or permitted ~o flow upon streets or other public property; (i) Accumulations in the open of discarded or disused machinery, household -4610- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612)975-9963 (TUE) 9.17'02 11:12/ST. ll:10/NO. 3760007753 P 5 (J) (k) ¢) (m) (n) (o) rio) (q) (0 (s) (t) (u) appliances, automobile bodies, or other materials, in a manner conducive to the harboring of rats, mice, snakes, or vermin, or to fire, health, Or safety hazards from such accumulation or from the rank growth of vegetation among the items so accumulated; ~ Iq ~'1/0 Noxious weeds, as that term is defined in Sectior(Ig:77~fMirmesota Statutes, and any excessive growth of other we~s; excess~owth of weeds means weeds or grass which are 12 inches or more in height; Any wire, except clothes linv wir~, which is strung less than 15 feet above the surface of the ground; Any fence or other structure maliciously erected or maintained for the purpose of annoying the owners or bccupants of adjoining property; All buildings, walls, and other structures which have been damaged by fire, decay, or otherwise, and which are so situated as to endanger the safety of thc public; All dead standing trees which present a hazard to like or property, all elm or other trees found harboring the Dutch elm beetle, all dead standing elm wood, and all cut elm or other wood found harboring the Dutch elm beetle; All dangerous, unguarded machinery, including derelict autos, derelict boats, and derelict refrigerators and freezers, in any public place, or so situated or operated on private property as to attract the public; Swimming in a channel or swimming or diving from a channel bridge; Operating any water craft, motor vehicle, or powered device or propelled device, on the open water, or upon the ice of a body of water, in such a manner as to endanger life, limb, or property; Standing ~pon any street bridge or raikoad bridge for the purposes of fishing therefrom; Causing to be made any fire on any public beach area or park except in fireplaces 'designated for that purpose; Any well, hole, or similar excavation which is left uncovered or in such other condition as to constitute a hazard to any child coming on the premises where it is lo¢ated; Obstruction to the flee flow or water in a natural waterway ora public street, drain, gutter, or ditch with trash or other materials; 4 -4611 - FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612) 975-996B (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11:12/ST, 11:10/NO. B?6000775B P 6 (v) (w) (x) (Y) (z) The placing or th.rowing on any street, sidewalk, or other public property of any glass, tacks, nails, bottles, or other substance which may injure any person or animal or damage any pneumatic tire when passing over such substance; The depositing of garbage or refuse on a public right-of-way or on adjacent private property; Conditions which, in the opinion of the Enforcement Officer, are conducive to the harborage or breeding of vermin including materials stored less than 12 inches off the ground; Improper Storing of Firewood: Ail firewood shall be stored in neat stacks. The height cfa woodpile over three feet shall be no more than twice its width but in no event shall the height exceed six feet. The stack of wood is to be piled in a regular orderly arrangement thai is stable and reasonably resistant to collapse. No firewood shall be stored on the street side of the yard. The total amount of firewood stored on the premises is to be no more than two fireplace cords. Firewood may be stored upon residential premises solely for the use on the premises and not for resale. Any building or premises to which there has been three or more police responses in a six month per/od (1) regarding illegal possession and/or illegal consumption, and/or illegal sale of alcohol on controlled substances, on (2) regarding noisy parties or noise gatherings which disturb the peace, quiet, or repose of another person. The parking and/or storage of construction equipment, farm vehicles, and equipment, or any commercial vehicle with a length greater than 21 feet, or a height greater than 8 feet, or a gross vehicle weight greater than 9,000 pounds, continuously for more than two hours on any property within a residential zoning district. Such equipment and vehicles shall include, but are not limited to, the following: dump trucks, construction trailers, back hoes; front, end loaders, bobcats, well drilling equipment, farm - trucks, combines, thrashers, tractors, tow trucks, truck-tractors, step vans, cube .vans, and the llke. The prohibitions of this section (AA) shall not apply to the following: l) Any equipment or vehicle described above being used by a public utility, governmental agency, construction company, moving company or similar company which is actually being used to service a residence not belonging to or -4612- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612) 975-9963 (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11 :13/ST. 11 :10/N0. 3760007753 P 7 occupied by the operator of the vehicle. 2) Any equipment or vehicle described above which is actually making a pick-up or delivery at the location where it is parked. Parking for any period of time beyond the - o ~ time reasonably necessary to ma_~..~~' such a pickup or delivery.~n excess of the two hour limit shall be ~olawful. (BB) The outside parking and/or storage on vacant property of usable or unusable vehicles, trailers, watercraft, snowmobiles, recreational vehicles, all-terrain vehicles, construction vehioles and equipment, or similar vehicles, materials, supplies, equipment, ice fish houses, skateboard ramps, play houses, or other nonpermanent structures except as may be permitted by the Zoning or Sign Ordinances. (CC) (DD) The outside parking and/or storage on occupied residentially used property of usable or nonusable vehicles, trailers, watercraft, snowmobiles, recreational vehicles, all terrain vehicles and similar vehicles, materials, supplies, equipment, ice fist houses, skateboard ramps, or other nonpermanent structures unless they comply with Zoning and Sign Ordinances. All vehicles, watercraft and other articles allowed to be stored outside in an approved manner or occupied residentially used property mnst be owned by a person who resides on the property. Persons who are away at school or in the military service for periods of time but still claim the property as their legal residence, shall be considered residents on the properly. · 'outdoors in which water or debris may a/:eumulat¢. Breeding sites of the A~de~ Tfis Eriatua (tree hole mosquito) including but not limited to': the basal holes of trees, unused tires (not mounted on wheels), pots, pans, cans, pails, bottles, or other containers left (Ord. #29-i~}~'9- 6-26-89) Section 1000::20. Dutie_s o_f_City Officers_,. The Police Department shall enforce the provisions relating to nuisances. Such officers shall have the power to inspect private premises and take all reasonable precautions to. prevent the commission and maintenance of public nuisances. Section 1000:25, ~ The City may abate the nuisance by the procedure descried below: Itl (a) Order~ The Enforcement Officer shall serve a written warning upon the owner as 6 -4613- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612)975-9963 (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11:lB/ST. 11:10/NO. 976000775~ P 8 provided herein. The written warning shall also be served upon any responsible party or property owner known to the officer and may be served upon any party known to have caused the nuisance. The written warning may be served by personal delivery or certified mail, or lithe premises are unoccupied and the mailing address of the owner is unknown, by posting the warning in a conspicuous location on the premises. The written warning shall contain the following: 2. 3. 4. A description of the real estate sufficient for identification; A description and location of the nuisance and the remedial action required to abate the nuisance; The abatement deadline, to be determined by the Enforcement Officer, allowing a reasonable time for tho performance of any act required. A statement that the order may be appealed at a hearing before the City Manager by filing a written request containing the owner's mailing address, w/th the City Clerk before the abatement deadline designed in the order; and A statement that if the remedial action is not timely completed nor a request for an appeal hearing filed with the City Clerk within the time specified, the City will abate the nuisance and charge all costs incurred therein against the real estate as a special assessment [o be collected in the same manner as property taxes. (b) Setting He_aH_rig DaLe. In the even that an appeal is timely filed with the City Clerk, tine City Manager shall promptly fix a date for an appeal, (c) Notice_. The City Clerk shall mail a notice of the date, time, place and subject of the heating to the owner and known responsible parties. The City Clerk shall also notify the Enforcement Officer. (d) .[teafi. ag. At the time ofthe appeal hearing, the City Manager shall hear from the Enforcement Officer, and anyctther parties who wish to be heard. After the hearing, the City Manager may confirm or modify the order of the Enforcement Officer. If the City Manager's determina~.~on .requires abatement, the City Manager shall, hisser decision, fix a time within which the nuisance.must be abated and shall provide that ifremedial action is not completed within the time speci~ed, the City may abate the nuisance. The City Clerk shall mail a copy of the City Manager's decision to the owner and any other party that was provided notice of the appeal hearing. (e) Adaaz.emm~ Ifthe remedial action is not completed nor an appeal filed within the time specified by the Enforcement Officer, or if the remedial action is not completed within the time specified by the City Manager after an appeal hearing, the City may abate the nui~anoe. ~ -4614- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612) 975-9963 (TUE) 9. 17'02 11:13/8T. ll:10,,fN'O. 376000775~ P 9 Section 1000:30. Recovery. of Cost Subd, 1. Personal l.iahility. Thc owner of premises on which a nuisance has been abated by the City shall be personally liable for the cost to the City of abatement, including administrative costs and attorneys fees. As soon as the work has been completed and the cost determined by the City Clerk or other official designated by the City Manager shall prepare a bill for the cost and mail it to the owner. Thereupon the amount shall be immediately due and payable at the office of the City Clerk. Subd. Assessm_ent. Any unpaid charges by the City for the cost of elimination of I the public nuisance may' be collected as a special assessment pursuant to Section 370 of the City Code. · Section 1000.35 No Election of Remedle.q. The notice and abatement of above provided in Section 1000.25 above ,~hall nat be deemed the exclusive method for the enforcement of Section 1000. Without notice, a proceeding may be instituted in a proper tribunal for the prosecution of a misdemeanor, and the judge in such a criminal ease may impose the fine or penalty authorized by law in such case made and provide~ including that contained in Section 347.04 of Minnesota Statutes for the disposition of dogs constituting a public nuisance. The civil remedies at law and equity shall be deemed available at all timm, without notice. The Health Officer may, concurrently with any such procedures, condemn such structures a~ unfit for habitation pursuant to Section 1005. Section 1000.4_9 _Derelict Ve_hicle Public N_uis _one_e,. Subdivision 1. Derelict Vehicles are declared to be a public nuisance and are subject to the abatement provisions of this Chapter. Subdivision 2. As used in this Section 1000,40 tho terms defined in this section have the meanings given to them in this Section: a. "Vehicle" means a motor vehicle as defined in S~tion 169.01 of Minnesota Statutes, motor cycle as defined in Section 169.01 of Minnesota Statutes, motorized bicycle as defined in Section 169.01 of Minnesota Statutes, electric assisted bicycle as defined by Section 169.10 of Minnesota Statues, i~:k-tractor as defined in Section 169.01 of Mirmesota Statutes, farm tractor as defined in Section 169.01 of Minnesota Statutes, road tractor as defined in Section 169.01 of Minnesota Statutes, trailer as defined in S~tion 169.01 of Minnesota Statutes, semi-trailer as defined in Section 169.01 of Minnesota Statutes, ~elf-propelled recreational vehicle as defined in Chapter 168 ofMinne~0ta ~tatute~, water craft as defined by Chapter 86B of Minnesota Statutes any contrivance used or design~ for navigation on water, off-road recreational vehicle as defined by Chapter 169A of Mirme~ota Statutes, ,nowmobile as defined by Chapter 84 of Minnesota Statutes, and/or all-terrain vehicle as defined by Chapter 84 of Minnesota Statutes. -4615- FROM CHADWICK AND MERTZ (612) 975-996B (TUE) 9. 17' 02 11:14/ST. 11:10/NO. B760007753 P 10 b. "Derelict Vehicle" means a vehicle, as defined in this subdivision; I. that has remained for a period of more than 48 hours on public property illegally, or 2. that lacks vital component pans, or 3. that has remained on private property with out the consent of the personx in control of such property, or 4. that is in an inoperable state such that it has no substantial further use consistent with its usual functions, or 5. that is not currently licensed to the owner or occupant of the property upon which it is being stored, or 6. in the case of motorized vehicles, that is not capable ofmovement under its own power. Subdivision 3. No person shall park, store, or leave, or permit the parking, storing or leaving of any derelict vehicle upon any property; including private property, within the city for a period in excess of 48 hours, unless: (1') such vehicle is completely enclosed within a building, (2) such vehicle is under the control ofthe City or its agent, (3) such vehicle is stored, or parked on private property in connection with a business or commercial enterprise, operated and. condhcted in a lawful manner and when such parking or storing of suer vehicle is necessary to the operation of the business or the commercial enterprise, or (4) such vehicle is stored or parked on private property of the owner thereof, or a member of the owner's family, for the purpose of making repairs thereto, provided that at all times such vehicle is so stored that at least one-half of the total number of wheels of such vehicle are in contact with the ground, and only one such vehicle may be so stored or parked at an)' one time. In the event cfa vehicle stored as provided in this Section, such vehicle may be stored for a period not to exceed 14 days, after which time, such vehicle is deemed to be a derelict vehicle. Any person Who stores or maintains a derelict vehicle on an)/public or private property, is guilty o f a misdemeanor. I':\N ETB ^C K\6678\N UISA N~'E.O RD -4616- Operation Clean Sweep Results Grid 10 6025 Cherrywood 2365 Commerce Blvd 2974 Oaklawn Ln 2214 Belmont Ln 2349 Commerce Blvd 2365 Commerce Blvd 2345 Commerce Blvd 2347 Commerce Blvd 2321 Commerce Blvd 2305 Commerce Blvd no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no Citation 06/10/02 07/08/02 07/02/02 06/28/02 08/20/02 08/20/02 08/20/02 08/20/02 08/16/02 08/16/02 Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Grid 20 2024 Sycamore Ln citation 07/03/02 Case Abated 5850 Sunset Rd no citation 08/16/02 Case ~ated Grid 30 1601 Dove Ln 1624 Finch Ln 4940 Crestview Ln 4945 Paradise Ln 1705 Eagle Ln 1772 Lafayette Ln 2161 Cardinal Ln 5025 Shoreline Dr 5055 Edgewater Dr no citation no citation no citation no citation no citatzon no citation no citation citation no citation 05/18/02 06/27/02 07/12/02 07/23/02 08/22/02 06/28/02 08/02/02 05/18/02 06/09/02 Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated -4617- 2201 Centerview Ln 2168 Centerview Ln 5205 Shoreline Dr 2161 Centerview Ln 2173 Centerview Ln 1833 Shorewood Ln 4858 Edgewater Dr 4860 Edgewater Dr 4908 Edgewater Dr 4924 Edgewater Dr 2185 Fairview Ln 5048 Edgewater Dr 5019 Edgewater Dr citation no citation no citation citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation no citation citation no citation 06/28/02 06/28/02 06/28/02 06/28/02 06/2'8/02 07/18/02 07/02/02 07/02/02 08/21/02 08/21/02 08/21/02 08/17/02 08/20/02 Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Grid 40 ::' '::~'"~ ' ':""'~::::::'~::~:'"' ':'~::'"":"%.'.:':!":~:~: .'.:!8~:i:~:."~::~:::'[:~:~:!:~::::':'::'"~'":'~::~:':~':~' :::':':':':':':~:::;.~:~:~::~"[~:~..:$.)$' . .... ~. :: '$: :~" ':[ '~::~::.~:!$i. "'"":~'" ::" ":':":":::'":' · ..~ '. ~:~.~ :. '. ¢:::!:!: · :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :'.'::.." : '".~. ' ::~$,.'~:i~.,.':::~:~.:$!:.;$!:~ ~.~.'.'~. ~...:: ." :.~D~::" · ..... ~' ~ :.~..~?..%:',$'~$~.::~.'~$ .%~:.:~:~:$:::'::::~:':.~.~:~.'"~:.):'.~.:'..::,~:~.:~.~'.~..$i.~.~. %".~'".~ ~'~"~:~.:.':::::::::~.".~'::$'~.::~:~"u:"'~.:':':" ~'"~::::'":"'>'":.,::..f~"",...,~"~::"" ":%~,"':': 5033 Bartlett Blvd no citation 08/16/02 Case Abated Grid 50 4470 Denbigh Rd 4474 Denbigh Rd 5504 Church Rd 3069 Brighton Blvd 4721 Aberdeen Rd 4474 Denbigh Rd 2888 Tuxedo Blvd 4936 Islandview Dr 3101 Tuxedo Blvd 4701 Aberdeen Rd 4843 Dale Rd 5326 Piper Rd no citation no citation citation citation no citation citation no citation no citation citation no citation citation no citation 06/03/02 06/03/02 06/17/02 07/08/02 07/03/02 06/17/02 07/04/02 07/03/02 07/08/02 06/26/02 07/30/02 08/05/02 Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated' Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated :. : ,: ::, :,:::~ ~ · .....:.. %::::~,:.. ============================================================================================= . :~<..::: . :...:. ,.. :,:,:.:,:.:.~:, . . .. ,., ............ ......... ...... .......... ............ ........... .......... 3200 Dexter Ln citation 08/09/02 Case ~ated 4772 Islandview Dr citation 08/16/02 Case ~ated 4725 Islandview Dr no citation 08/20/02 Case ~ated 3200 Dexter Ln citation 08/17/02 Case ~ated .....:::.. -. :::...: :~' ================================================================================== :;:::::::::: ~:::::::::::~::::::~::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::%:::::::~ ::::::::':::::::::::f:%:::;~:: :'.'.:::.' ,.:::::.' ::~-..,:., '.:: :::' '::.','. :'.'.'.:$::: :;$:: '"'.:$ %%:::~: :)~:' ':~%: ',:::::: ::::;: 3068 Brighton Blvd no citation 08/20/02 Case ~ated 5110 Windsor Rd citation 08/22/02 Case ~ated 5124 Windsor Rd citation 08/22/02 Case ~ated -4618- 2605 Tyrone Ln 2718 Tyrone Ln 2725 Tyrone Ln 5116 Waterbury Ln 2700 Tyrone Ln citation no citation citation no citation no citation 08/21/02 08/21/02 08/2t/02 08/21/02 08/21/02 Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Case Abated Page 1 of 5 Kandis M Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us> Friday, September 06, 2002 2:49 PM VVestonka.news Westonka.news Vol. 3, No. 1 September 6, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community member~, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. Westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN 55364; http://www.westomka.kl 2.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten~westonka.kl 2.mn.us. Contents 1. News Briefs --Al's Master Plumbing Comes to the Rescue at Grandview --Remembrance of September 11 --Operating Levy Referendum Vote on September 10 2. Focus Topic: What's Different This Year? 3. Upcoming Events 4. How Are We Doing? NEWS BRIEFS **Al's Master Plumbing Comes to the Rescue at Grandview** When a building (and therefore its bathrooms) reaches a certain age, things get.., well .... a little stinky. Such was the situation at Grandview Middle School last year. Word on the street was that the Grandview bathrooms were, in middle school parlance, "gross." Eight of Grandview's bathrooms were on the bond project list, but cost estimates came in higher than projected, and it appeared for a while -4620- 9/6/02 Page 2 of 5 that only four of the eight wot/Id be able to be remodeled with the bond funds available. Enter A1 Foschiatti and his crew from Al's Master Plumbing. A1 had been contacted by GMS parent Sheryl Hill, a client of Al's, who knew of his excellent work and his support for his local school district. After speaking with Sheryl and touring the school, A1 put his crew to work. Over the summer, A1 and his employees worked on all eight bathrooms, contributing labor, and providing fixtures and lots of tender loving care. By the time school started, all eight bathrooms were sparkling clean, with new plumbing and fixtures that work beautifully. Do bathrooms have anything to do with learning? You bet. According to principal Kevin Borg, "When students aren't proud of their school, it really affects learning. In the past, kids who needed to go to the bathroom but were reluctant to use the facilities got distracted easily and were literally uncomfortable during the school day. When I announced the new bathrooms at our open house, the news was met with cheers." Thanks to A1 Foschiatti and his crew from Al's Master Plumbing! **Remembrance of September 11'* Next week, Westonka faculty, staff and students will join the rest of the nation in remembering the tragedy of September 11. Shirley Hills students and staff will gather for a short program that will include: comments from Mound Fire Department Chief Greg Peterson; patriotic songs; and the presentation of a banner created by Shirley Hills students as a gift to the Mound Fire Department. Students will be asked to wear red, white and blue, and classes will collect cash donations from Sept. 11-18 to give to the Mound Fire Department. At Hilltop Primary, students and staff will gather around the flagpole (weather permitting) for a short program of remembrance, including a moment of silence and recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Students and staff will also be asked to wear red, white and blue. Grandview students and staff will gather by a tree planted last year in memory of the 9/11 victims. Students will sing patriotic songs and principal Kevin Borg will provide a short program, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Mound Westonka students will do a formal remembrance activity during morning announcements. -4621 - 9/6/02 Page 3 of 5 **Operating Levy Referendum Vote on September 10'* Please remember to vote on Tuesday, September 10, Primary Election Day. The school district Operating Levy Referendum will be on the ballot. For information about the levy, please call the Levy Hotline (952.491.8443), check the district website (www.westonka.kl2.mn.us) or consult the Levy Information Handbook that was mailed to all district households in late July. For information about where to vote, call your local city office or check the school district website at www.westonka.kl2.mn.us/ref2002/voting.html. Polls are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. FOCUS TOPIC **What's Different This Year?** Every year brings changes, and this year is no exception. We have a new district leader, plus some changes as a result of the $742,000 in budget cuts made for 2002-2003. --New Leadership-- Welcome new superintendent, Gene Zulk! Supt. Zulk is a familiar face to most district residents, having served for 16 years as principal of Mound Westonka High School. Zulk's goals for the next few years include: helping the school district develop a closer relationship with the community; protecting and building on student programs; guiding the district out of debt by 2005; and seeing voter approval of the 2002 operating levy referendum. --Budget cuts and fee increases-- Cuts and fee increases were necessary to balance the budget for 2002-2003. Selected examples include: ++students are walking longer distances to bus stops ++class sizes are bigger at Hilltop Primary and Mound Westonka High School ++high school students are paying higher fees to park and participate in extracurricular activities. For example, the cross country participation fee went from $60 last year to $95 this year, and participants in dance team and cheerleading are paying a new $75 fee. Student parking permits rose from $24 per year to $100 per year. For more information about budget cuts made for 2002-2003, check the district website at www.westonka.kl 2.mn.us/ref2002/cuts3.html -4622- 9/6/O2 Page 4 of 5 --Adjustments made to comply with fire and indoor air quality requirements Remember that comfy sofa in your child's primary school room? It may have been removed if its upholstery was not adequately fire retardant. Certain older furniture was removed, as well, to eliminate possible risk of reactions to dust or other allergens. UPCOMING EVENTS --September 9, First day of classes for Westonka Preschool --September 9, School Board meeting, 7:30 p.m. "Share the Success" portion of the meeting starts at 7 p.m. Shirley Hills Primary School media center --September 10, Primary Election Day, School Operating Levy Referendum. Please remember to vote. --September 10, GMS and MW Student Photo Day --September 11, Remembrance Events at all schools (see story above) --September 12-13, Gr. 8 Respect Retreat Please note the following athletic event change: The varsity football game with Mpls. Patrick Henry has been re-scheduled for 3:45 p.m. (today, Friday, September 6). The original scheduled start time of 7 p.m. conflicted with Rosh Hashanah. BONDS AND LEVIES Levies are for Learning (paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries, utilities, and bus service) An operating levy is on the ballot for September 10. Bonds are for Buildings (keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such as computers) A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001. HOW ARE WE DOING? We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. E-mail: welisten~westonka.kl 2.mn.us -4623- 9/6/02 Page 5 of 5 District Feedback Line: 952.491.8260 Mail: (see contact information below) To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonb@westonka.kl 2.mn.us> It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 welisten~we stonka, k 12. mn. us http ://www.we stonka, k 12. mn. us Westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is public data. -4624- 9/6/02 Page 1 of 5 Kandis M Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olson b@westonka, kl 2. mn. us> Friday, September 13, 2002 1:40 PM Westonka. news Westonka.news Vol. 3, No. 2 September 13, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. Westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN 55364; http://www.westonka.kl 2.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten~westonka.k 12.mn.us. Contents 1. News Briefs --Athletic Fields & Educational Service Center Update --Westonka Preschool Still Has Openings --Student Artists Bring Home State Fair Accolades 2. Focus Topic: Operating Levy Approved by Voters 3. Upcoming Events 4. How Are We Doing? NEWS BRIEFS **Athletic Fields and Educational Service Center Update** Work continues on new athletic facilities and the Educational Service Center, both under construction near Mound Westonka High School. The project is under budget and, except for minor rain delays, nearly on time. The new athletic fields are taking shape. They have been seeded and appear to be surviving the rains in relatively good condition. They are -4625- 9/13/02 Page 2 of 5 still fragile, however, and there has been minor damage by rain, deer, and golfers. The school district would appreciate everyone's care to stay off the field areas. By protecting them during this fragile growing season, we believe the fields will be in good shape for use next fall. The Educational Service Center is taking form, as well, and is both on time and under budget. Current plans call for completion this winter, with occupancy scheduled for sometime after January. **Westonka Preschool Still Has Openings** Good news for everyone with a preschooler: there are still some spots open in the Westonka Community Preschool for the 02-03 school year! Spots are limited and fill quickly. If you're interested, please call 952.491.8048 as soon as possible to inquire about specific openings. ** Student Artists Bring Home State Fair Accolades** Westonka students have a highly regarded reputation as State Fair Art Competition winners, and this year was no exception. In addition to nearly 125 ribbons and honorable mentions, Westonka students brought home two Grand Champion "purple ribbon" awards. Westonka has a strong tradition of entering student artwork and having a high percentage of the entries earn ribbons. At Grandview, for example, 64% of the entries in 2002 earned ribbons. Nancy Herberg's second grade class (from 2001-2002) at Shirley Hills Primary earned a Grand Champion Award for their "Freedom Banner," featuring photos of each student scanned and printed onto fabric, complemented by patriotic graphic elements and comments from each student about what freedom means. Grandview art students earned a Grand Champion Award for their "Principal's Necktie" series, featuring hand-designed paper neckties that were fashionably modeled by Principal Kevin Borg throughout March 2002. The ties were designed by students in grades 5-7 in celebration of Youth Art Month. These achievements don't happen without help from parents, students and teachers. Parents are often involved as volunteers in art classes, and provide the support and encouragement for student artists to excel. Teachers contribute many hours of volunteer time to prepare materials, transport artwork to and from the fair, and arrange installation and take-down of the local art exhibit. - 4626 - 9/13/02 Page 3 of 5 All the State Fair artwork is on display at the Westonka Community Library. A reception will be held at the Library on Wednesday, September 25, from 7-8:30 p.m., to honor the student artists and their creations. FOCUS TOPIC **Operating Levy Approved by Voters** The September 10 Operating Levy Referendum was approved by voters, with 2475 votes in favor, and 2094 against. Approval of the operating levy means that the School District will be able to balance its budget by making only $300,000 in budget cuts for 2003-2004. Had the levy failed, the cuts required to balance the budget for 2003-2004 would have totalled $1.1 million. Superintendent Gene Zulk, speaking on behalf of the School Board and school staff, was pleased with the results. "We're very encouraged by the positive vote. It shows that voters understood and accepted the plan we laid out to balance the budget while keeping a strong educational program. Now we can focus on making our terrific academic program even better, growing student enrollment, and getting completely out of debt by 2005. We're excited!" Voter turnout was the third highest in 17 years of school levy and/or bond votes, with 4569 votes cast. (The next highest turnout was in 1995, when 4600 votes were cast. The number of no votes in 2002 remained relatively unchanged from the failed levy vote in 2001 (2094 in 2002 vs. 2078 in 2001). However, more than 1,000 additional yes voters came to the polls in 2002. UPCOMING EVENTS --September 16, GMS Magazine Sales Kick-off --September 16, School Board Special Study Session, 7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High School Theater --September 16, MW Parent Advisory, 7 p.m. --September 17, --September --September 1 --September 1 --September --September --September --September SH PTA, 7 p.m. 17, HT PTA, 7 p.m.) 7, Community Education Advisory Council, 7 p.m., SH 8, SH Student Photo Day 18-20, GMS Fall Play Auditions, 2:30 p.m. 18, MW Senior Parent Night, 7 p.m. 20, HT ELC Candy Kick-off 25, State Fair Art Exhibit & Reception, 7 p.m., Westonka -4627- 9/13/02 Page 4 of 5 Community Library Home Athletic Events (for more sports schedules, go to www.mshsl.org/mshsl/schoolpage.asp?school=314 --September 16, Boys' Soccer vs. Benilde, 4 p.m. --September --September --September --September --September --September --September 17, Cross Country Grasshopper Run, 4 p.m. 17, Boys' Soccer vs. Columbia Heights, 4:30 p.m. 17, Volleyball vs. St. Anthony; JV: 5:30 p.m., V: 7 p.m. 18, Girls' Soccer vs. Columbia Heights, 4:30 p.m. 19, Girls' Swimming vs. Fridley, 5:30 p.m. 21, Varsity Volleyball Tournament, 9 a.m., MW 21, Boys' Soccer vs. Glencoe Silver Lake, 11 a.m. BONDS AND LEVIES Levies are for Learning (paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries, utilities, and bus service) An operating levy was approved by voters in September 2002. Bonds are for Buildings (keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such as computers) A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001. HOW ARE WE DOING? We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. E-mail: welisten~westonka.k 12.mn.us District Feedback Line: 952.491.8260 Mail: Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonb~westonka.k 12.mn.us> It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in parmership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A -4628- 9/13/02 Page 5 of 5 Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 welisten(~westonka.k 12.mn.us http ://www. we stonka, k 12. mn. us Westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is public data. -4629- 9/13/02 Page 1 of 1 Kandis M Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb(~westonka.k12.mn.us> Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:41 AM Westonka.news special edition: fundraising awareness Fundraising seams are rare in the Westonka community, but it appears that one reared its head earlier this week. The timing is unfortunate, since many *legitimate* school fundraisers are just getting underway. Please read this message carefully, so that you can be especially ammed to the genuine student salespeople coming to your door for worthy causes vs. people who might want to take advantage of you. At least one young adult has been appearing at doors in Mound this week, identifying himself as a neighborhood resident and local high school student, requesting donations for a trip to Europe. In a case brought to the school district's attention, he was not selling a product, but requested a contribution in exchange for homemade brownies. The resident reported the incident to area police, who believe the person involved is collecting donations in a fraudulent manner. There are many legitimate and important fundraisers held by public schools, private schools, booster clubs, and youth clubs throughout the year. It is impossible to give specific characteristics for each one, but it's appropriate to remind residents to be thoughtful about door-to-door solicitations. Most school and/or club fundraisers sell *products*, earning money through a commission on the products sold. In general, certain behaviors can raise a red flag: a request for cash donations only; a solicitation without any supporting materials (such as catalogues to look through or forms to complete); a refusal to offer a receipt; or a presentation that just seems a little too polished to be a genuine student salesperson. As always, your local schools and community groups appreciate your support of legitimate fundraising efforts, which fortunately far outnumber any fraudulent ones. Barbara Olson Community Relations Coordinator Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Blvd, Suite A Mound MN 55364 p: 952.491.8006 f: 952.491.8043 e-mail: olsonb~westonka.k 12.mn.us We know your child by name... We help your child achieve. - 4630 - 9/19/02 Minnesota Lawful Gambling Government Acknowledgment Form - LG503 Use of This Form Certain Contributions Prohibited 1. If an organization wishes to contribute gambling funds to a unit of government, the organization and unit of government must complete this form. 2. Approval of the Gambling Control Board is not required. 3. The form must be kept on file by the licensed organi- zation. Minnesota Statutes, section 349.12, subdivision 25(b)(6), prohibits "a contribution to a statutory or home rule or charter city, county, or town by a licensed organization with the knowledge that the governmental unit intends to use the contribution for a pension or retirement fund." Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0120, subpart 5D(10), prohibits "any contribution or expenditure to the extent that it results in any net monetary gain or other pecuniary benefit to the organization making the contribution or expenditure." 4. Attach a copy of this form to your Schedule C report for the month in which the funds are spent. Organization Information orgqnization _.---., ..~, Phone Number License NUmber Add .... ' -[ J City j /j~tate ..~.~_~ Am°unt °f lawful purp°se c°ntributi°n '° the unit °f government: l $ -~~ We are awe. re of_the restrictions contained in Minnesota Statutes, section 349.12, subdivision 25(b)(6); and " Mi n n e s~/~ rt ~;~/~//~.~.` ,.s u bpa rt 5D(10). ~ ure~hie~xecutive ?ffi~CEO) Print Name Date Government Information JNar0e of Government f ,~k type of government: ~J~City [] County [~ Township ~ School District No. L_J State of Minnesota, Department of ~-] United States, Department of E~] Other Government Entity - specify: Amount of lawful purpose contribution received: of Division of Division of Phone Number State Zip We are aware of the restrictions contained in Minnesota Statutes, section 349.12, subdivision 25(b)(6); and Minnesota Rules, part 7861.0120, subpart 5D(10). ~;igna~e of Government-Agent ' - Print Name Title Date This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, The information requested on this form will become public informa- Braille) upon request. If you use a 'FI-Y, you can call us by using the tion when received by the Board, and will be used to determine Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 and ask to place a call your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules governing law- to' (612) 639-4000. ful gambling activities. (9/97) -4631 - CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT August 2002 66.67% August 2002 YTD PEF~CENT BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED GENERAL FUND Council 79,280 5,570 51,650 27,630 65.15% City Manager/Clerk 235,100 20,101 152,603 82,497 64.91% Elections 11,030 0 890 10,140 8.07% Finance 201,260 14,455 128,720 72,540 63.96% Assessing 79,700 12 77,290 2,410 96.98% Legal 122,000 12,661 71,336 50,664 58.47% City Property 89,110 7,890 54,017 35,093 60.62% Computer 28,250 231 19,363 8,887 68.54% Police 1,164,600 60,974 660,311 504,289 56.70% Emergency Prepardeness 6,780 2,255 6,746 34 99.50% Planning/Inspections 266,030 37,020 189,339 76,691 71.17% Streets 576,610 41,436 334,150 242,460 57.95% Parks 322,240 28,047 211,864 110,376 65.75% Transfers 207,840 17,320 138,560 69,280 66.67% Cable TV 48,000 22,521 22,696 25,304 47.28% Contingencies 60,860 _0 (89) 60,949 -0.15% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3,498,690 270,493 2,119,446 1,379,244 60.58% Area Fire Service Fund 699,470 Cemetery Fund 9,920 Dock Fund 132,700 TIF 1-2 0 Water Fund 577,660 Sewer Fund 1,007,420 Liquor Fund 460,660 Recycling Fund 155,510 Storm Water Utility 58,200 44,730 383,256 316,214 54.79% 0 1,258 8,662 12.68% 2,098 37,120 95,580 27.97% 132,958 558,850 (558,850) 51,822 490,920 86,740 84.98% 77,286 680,367 327,053 67.54% 57,229 297,467 163,193 64.57% 16,360 81,850 73,660 52.63% (10,825) 45,067 13,133 77.43% Exp-02 09/1712002 Gino -4632- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT August 2002 66.67% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from Other Funds Charges to Other Departments August 2002 YTD PERCENT 2,253,520 0 1,037,965 (1,215,555) 46.06% 6,300 350 7,375 1,075 117.06% 188,450 16,527 167,021 (21,429) 88.63% 461,130 0 232,247 (228,883) 50.36% 137,550 6,906 75,012 (62,538) 54.53% 110,000 7,085 55,649 (54,351) 50,59% 145,400 31,592 123,376 (22,024) 84.85% 128,000 0 0 (128,000) 0.00% ! 3.000 O 8,920 (4.080) 68.62% TOTAL REVENUE 3.443.350 62.460 1.707.565 (1.735.785) 49.59% FIRE FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCK FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND RECYCLING FUND STORM WATER UTILITY 429,470 20,461 352,778 (76,692) 82.14% 6,050 0 2,685 (3,365) 44.38% 129,360 413 114,069 (15,291) 88.18% 535,500 45,638 355,952 (179,548) 66.47% 1,048,810 89,384 717,714 (331,096) 68.43% 2,050,000 197,299 1,266,413 (783,587) 61.78% 127,880 36,896 91,333 (36,547) 71.42% 112,000 8,522 70,227 (41,773) 62.70% 09/17~2002 rev01 Gino -4633- General Fund $1,023,851 CDBG 1,114 Area Fire Protection Services 250,317 Grant Revolving 0 Cemetery (1,163) Dock 204,539 PW Facility 105,282 G.O. Improvement Bonds (36,752) Commerce Place TIF (20,588) TIF 1-2 Notes 25,578 G.O. Bonds 2001 - A 4,263 G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 19,147 HRA Lease Rev Bonds 718,278 Capital Improvement 7,426,799 MSA 20,096 Sealcoat 1,259 CDB 2,097 Downtown TIF 1-2 (1,854,957) Water 1,279,582 Sewer 1,098,732 Liquor Store 1,402,033 Recycling 95,765 Storm Water 870,110 Fire Relief (67,105) HRA 319 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 09/13~2OO2 CashReportCouncil Gino -4634- -4635- -4636- -4637- 09-1B-2002 407~ Sunse~ Drfve Box 385 Spring Park, MN ~;~Dl-038~ Phone- gE,2-471-7125 Fax- ~5Z-471-9151 E-mail- I~uswest, net OD:5?RM FROM LRKE MINNETONKR COMMUNICR TO 4?20620 P.01 Comments: If you do not receive all of the pages, please contact our office as soon as possible at 952.471.7125 -4638- 09-18-2002 09:57AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4?20620 P.02 -4639- 09-18-2002 09:S?AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4?20620 P.03 -4640- TOTRL P.03 Westonka Healthy Community CollaboratiVe Agenda -September 25, 2002 12:30 - 2:00 PM Gillespie Center 2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound 1. Lunch 12:30 'Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a sandwich buffet. The buffet isa "free will" donation, suggested value of $6.00. 2. Introductions start at 12:45 3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes 4. Announcements 5. Plan for Community Resource Mapping The Alliance .is funding a facilitator to coordinate "community resource mapping" in our community ~and all Ce communities in. Hennepin County. We need to come up with a list ~of people to be invited to the next two Collaborative mee.t~ gs, 6. Mound ~sions md RedevelOPment Things are changing in Mound! The ground work is laid, the dirt is moving and the walls are growing. The city staff., will show us all the changes p!~ed, ~.: , "Even ff you're on the r~t track, you,ll get m over if you just sit there." --Will Rogers ., Any comments Or: questiOns, call Leah Weycker, COllaborative Co0gdinator, at 952-491-8058 or WeyckerL@ westonka.kl2.mn.us -4641 - Advisory Group Updates Health Sandy Olstad, Laurie Fitz, Mary Ooode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brelcke .. Some of the Depression Awareness task force members are working on a camp for youth to."tram' the trainer" and bring back ideas on depression and suicide awareness to implement in their XespeCtive school. Youth Activities Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer .Skate park; .qkate. park; ~kate park_ The ekate ?rk task force i_s sd!! wai_ti_n_g on t_he "bi_g d_on~tion" we were expecting. Parenting Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Bill Erickson The Parent Education group is putting out new parenting brochures for the schools, library and clinic. If anyone is interested in receiving brochures on parenting, let Leah know. We are still working on the web site and looking at recruiting new members. Community Margaret Holste, Cathy Bailey This group has. not met. Communications Anne Wilbur, Carol Olson The student welcome back to school eVent Went well. This year the studentS were greeted at the' doors and given a tooth brush that said "smile, your community Cares about you": The school staff receiVed tumblers with our message of "Westonka students are loved, appreciated, respected, accepted encouraged and trusted". This group is working on sending this message to the area leaders and business people and encouraging membership and awarenesS ~':6ur C611aborafive. Executive' ~ Craig Anderson, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, SandY Rau~hendorfer, Mary Hughes The executive group did not need to meet this month. They continue to work on getting a group together for the Jubilee site. AHiance for Families and Children in HennePin CoUnty Preparations for the attendance project and the Hand in'Hand Primary Project are under way. Both of these projects will continue in the primary schools and Hand in Hand is also in the pre-school. Marcy Harris, along with a group from the Alliance, had a draft of structure changes for the Alliance. Eventually we will have to adopt this document. -4642- Westonka Health Community Collaborative Minutes - August 28, 2002 Present: Bill Anderson, Craig Anderson, Mary Goode, Marcy Harris, John McKinley, Mary Hughes, Kathy Jones, Patsy Kiesow, Carol Olson, Sandy Olstad, Leah Weycker. Guests: Tamara Bomar- Westonka Psychological, Molly McDonough - American Cancer Society, Gene Zulk- Westonka Public Schools Superintendent. 1. Additions or Changes to the Agenda or Minutes: There were no changes to the minutes. Agenda changes: several people had annoUncements t0 make. 2. Announcements: ~ Molly McDonouoh from the Am~ricen {~nc.~r ,~nc.i~ ~nnnHn~cl ~ ,_nrn.~tr~t~..~r~.nin~ ~ncl training for 'q'ell-a Friend", a prOgram that trains VOlunteers to ~:ecr~it;~ ~0ni~ ~d~upp~ o~her volunteers who call women they know to encourage them to get a mammogram. Patsy Kiesow from the Lake Minnetonka Chamber of Commerce announced.the Taste of. the Lakes 'event that will take place on Sept. 20. Tickets are on sale from many Chamber members. This event has proven to be one of the fun events of the season. Mary Goode discussed a blood drive that will take place from 12-7 on Sept. 26. She stressed the importance of being a. bl00d donor and how almost e~eryo..ne can do. it! The'VFW invited everyone to attend a: dedication to cOmmemorate the events of September 11. The dedication of a monument will take place on September 11 at 4:00 PM at Veterans Park in Mound, across the street from the VFW on Commerce Blvd. 3. Gene Zulk, Westonka Public Schools Superintendent: Gene announced that the area police and fire departments are invited to the school board meeting on Sept. 9. The school board wishes to honor our !0cai service providers. Gene thanked the Collaborative for all that they have done for the school district. The insulated tumblers given out at the staff welcome back to school event were very appreciated, He. is excited about the funding we provided for a new project involving academic coaChing at' the high school. He also recognized the funding we h,a. ve provided in the past and continue to provide fOr Relate coun§eling ~n~i the after SchOOl activity b~S~ As a new superintendent in the school district, Gene talked about some of his PersOnal and. school goals.. He talked about the upcoming school referendum on Sept. 10. He wants to make sure. all voters have any and all questions answered. 4. Misc Marcy Harris updated us about restructuring the Allian~¥0r ~arniiie's ~and chil~ren in: Hennepin ' County. The Alliance is a group of all of the Family Service Collaboratives in Hennepin County and the Childrens Mental Health Collaborative along with the state mandatedP~:~i~S like~ Hennepin County, community action groups, schools and others. A group of members, headed up by Marcy, have been working on bylaws and a decision making structure for Alliance work, Eventually, we will have to adopt that structUre. Leah'plAhs on' h~i~'~th~ ex%utive ws~k grOUp look at and make a recommendation to the whole Collaborative. Marcy, who works for Community Action for Suburban Hennepin County (CASH), also talked about a resource committee, through the Alliance, that she is working with. This group will be a support system for grant writing on the Alliance level and CASH is willing, to offer this grant writing service to all the local collaboratives and our partners. -4643- ThE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTEs HAVE BEEN CONSISTENTLY IDENTIFI EDAS ESSENTIAL TO EFFECTIVE COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS: Bonnie Benard 1. There must be sense of gain for each person or organization involved 2. Time is necessary to do joint planning and decision making (time to get to know other's doing different kinds of work, to strip away the stereotypes, etc.) 3. ReaChing,out,- action'taking~ individuals are needed to initiate and sustain the collaborative effort 4. Sharing of resources 5. Group meetings are ongoing and frequent. Good communication is essential. 6. Institutional support. Without the SUppOrt, if not the participation, of the leadership of involved agencies and organizations, follow through will be impossible to achieve. 7. Broad based representation (inclUding youth and elderS) 8. The establishment of mutual (common) goals and objectives 9. Attention to theprocess as well as theproduct (gOals, mission, etc.) 10. Mutual respect. I 1. Shared leaderShip (rotate the chair, helping each person, who wants to, learn group facilitation, group leadership skills, ) "In genuine collaboration all partners learn and all partners teach." 12. Shared planning, decision inaking, L'valuati0h,'and leadership creates a sense of~h~red ownership on the part of each participant. 13. Commitment. 14. 15. Incentives, recognition, and awards. Traits like patience, persistence, initiative, flexibility, empathy, self-assurance. -4644-~ This Page. Is Left I ' ntent~onally Blank -4645-