Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2002-10-22
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2002 - 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: AUG 20, 2002 SPECIAL MEETING SEPT 24, 2002 REGULAR MEETING 4645 4646-4651 *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS: OCT 8,2002, AFTER THE FACT 4652-4671 OCT 22,2002 4672-4698 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT NO BIDS WERE RECEIVED FOR SNOW REMOVAL FOR PARKING LOTS IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT *C. *D. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH WIDMER, INC PER QUOTE APPROVE PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1 TO DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING, INC FOR WORK ON THE 2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT *E. APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST TO SM HENTGES FOR WESTEDGE BOULEVARD WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT *F. APPROVE SETTING BID OPENING FOR OLD POST OFFICE: NOV 6, 11:00 A.M. *G. APPROVE SETTING PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA: NOVEMBER 12, 2002 AT 7:30 *H. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) 4699-4700 4701-4705 4706-4709 4710 4711 PI,EASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 10. 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ACTION ON RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2002 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PA1LKIN(3 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT - ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR 4712-4714 ACTION ON RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT WATER & SEWER ASSESSMENT- ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR 4715-4722 Co ACTION ON RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL - ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR 4723-4725 ACTION ON RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR WESTEDGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 4726-4738 TODD CHRISTOPHERSON OF AMCON: UPDATE AND DISCUSSION ON PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY PROJECT 4739-4749 ACTION ON REQUEST FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY FO RELEASE OF TAX- FORFEIT PARCEL AT CARDIGAN LANE/WILSHIRE BOULEVARD PID #19-117-23-31-0102 4750-4764 ACTION ON REQUEST FOR REDUCTION ON LETTER OF CREDIT FROM RH DEVELOPMENT 4765-4768 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. ACTION ON CASE # 02-27/02-37 MARSHALL & STACY MIDDESTAEDT 4769-4792 LOTS 7,8,16,17, BLK 10, WOODLAND PT 1625 EAGLE LANE WAIVER OF PLATTING/VARIANCES ENGINEER'S PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION ON ASSESSMENT POLICIES 4793-4797 12. 13. ACTION SETTING SPECIAL MEETINGS A. DEVELOPMENT UPDATE, INCLUDING HENNEPIN COUNTY REPORT ON CSAH 15 RELOCATION B. 2003 BUDGET MEETING SRA REPORT: COUNCIL MEMBER HANUS 14. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS B. C. D. E. F. Correspondence: Mound Westonka Schools Redevelopment Project Team update Report: Finance Department through Sept 2002 Correspondence: LMCD Update: Dreamwood lawsuit Report: Mound Police Department- Sept 2002 4798-4802 4803-4805 4806-4808 4809-4844 4845-4863 4864-4866 PLEASE TURN OFF Al,l, CEI,L PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. G. Update: Relocation of lift station by Met Council 4867-4868 H. Report: HRA insurance premium for 2002 4869 I. Notice: CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco 4870 J. Newsletter: Oillespie Center 4871 K. Award: Finance Director Gino Businaro 4872 L. Report: CDBG Project Status report 4873-4874 M. FYI: Notice to vacate to US Postal Service 4875 15. ADJOURN This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. cityo/~nound, com. More current meeting COUNCIL BRIEFING October 22, 2002 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Oct 22 - 7:15 - HRA regular meeting Oct 22 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Oct 24 - 6:30 - CC budget workshop Nov 5 - General and Local Election Nov 11 - Closed for Veteran's Day Nov 12 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Nov 12 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Nov 14 & 15 - Police Chief interviews Nov 18 - Tree Lighting Ceremony Nov 26 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Nov 26 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Nov 28 & 29 - Closed for Thanksgiving Dec 2 - 7:00 - Special meeting for Truth in Taxation and other business Dec 9 - 7:00 - Continuation for Truth in Taxation and, other business, if needed Dec 10 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Dec 10 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Dec 24 & 25 - Closed p.m. of 24th and all day Dec 25, for Christmas Absences Dec 11-18 Kandis Hanson Surgery Dec' 24-29 Kandis Hanson Holiday vacation #12. Special Meetings Please bring your calendar to help set some meeting dates. The first will be a redevelopment update, co-hosted by Hennepin County engineering. County staff will describe the road realignment project and the timelines, and City staffwill update the public on the other information regarding the downtown. I am suggesting early to mid-November. Secondly, we need to set some budget meetings. The budget needs to be in its final form by Dec 2, which is the date of the Truth in Taxation Hearing. #14.M. Post Office Update The Denver office of the USPS notified us this week that they expect to be out of the old facility by the end of November. Our lease with them ran out the end of September, so they are preparing an extension that will list the December 15 date as the last possible date of occupancy, enabling the demo of the old building to occur in December, as planned. The greenway project will follow in early spring. Hurrah! Human Resources With over 60 applications to choose from, the candidate pool for Police Chief has been narrowed to nine. I hope to further narrow that to five. Candidates will be subject to psychological testing by Westonka Psychological. Testing will be done in advance of the interviews and will be, in part, the basis for decision- making. There has been an overwhelming response to the ads for Liquor Store Manager. I have placed high trequirements on the position to ensure that the City attains a professional with marketing and management strengths who can significantly grow the profits at the new store. Both positions will likely begin after around the first of the year. Other There are just five regular council meetings left this year! The last meeting is Dec 10. to get the worl( done before we have more than a month off from meetings. We must work diligently Report: Summer Hours At the start of summer hours, staff was informed that it was to be a "pilot project," that I had certain expectations that must be met, and that there could be no abuses by frequently taking Fridays off. We created comment cards and staff did their best to get written comments, but unfortunately, customers mere reluctant to take the time to fill them out. The comments received were: o Great benefit to the city and to the employees. Very good idea. I would not have got my water turned on i£you were no open till 5:00 p.m. This helps us working folk out a lot. Thank you. About time! It is my thought that had our customers been unhappy with the hours, we would have gotten lots of written comments. As is typical, when they are okay or happy with a service we don't generally receive comments or praise. It is my recommendation that we repeat the hours in future years. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 20, 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Tuesday, August 20, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Members Absent: Councilmember Bob Brown Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Parks Director Jim Fackler, Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner, Police Chief John McKinley, Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Finance Director Gino Businaro 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel opened the meeting at 6:30 p.m. 2. BUDGET WORKSHOP It was noted that this workshop is just to get the big picture of the proposed budget, strictly to get to the September preliminary budget adoption. Department Heads answered questions presented by the Council 3. ADJOURN MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adjourn the meeting at 8:23 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -4645- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Planner Loren Gordon, City Engineer John Cameron, Sharon Cook, Steffan Madsen, Danene Provencher, Mark Reckinger, Kelly Johnson, Frank Weiland, Ann Eberhart, Karl Weisenhorn, Todd Christopherson, Mike Hagen, John Hubler, Steve Bedeu, Gregg Towley, Chuck Carlson, Katie Hoff, Mark Hagen, Paul Meisel, Dave Peterson, Jim Turner, Gary Simmons Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda. vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. Upon roll call A. Approve Minutes of September 3rd special meeting, September 5th special meeting and September 9~h regular meeting. B. Approve Payment of Claims in the amount of $374,365.93. C. RESOLUTION NO. 02-91: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCES TO REBUILD THE EXISTING 1-STORY RAMBLER WITH TUCK UNDER GARAGE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2586 AVON DRIVE - P&Z CASE #02-31. D. RESOLUTION NO. 02-92: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED 1 -4646- Mound City Council Minutes - September 24, 2002 GARAGE AT 4841 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOTS I & 2, BLOCK 14, DEVON, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. P&Z CASE #02-32. E. Approve Payment Request #1 to Buffalo Bituminous for work on Westedge Boulevard Street Improvement in the amount of $43,606.10. 5. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA None were offered. 6. PUBLIC HEARING - CASE #02-34 - MAHOGANY BAY~ CUP AMENDMENT Sarah Smith reviewed the request from Mahogany Bay for a conditional use permit amendment to extend the timeframe for paving of the parking lot. The original CUP was approved in 2000 and amended in 2001 to extend the timeframe for completion of paving to October 1,2002. The applicant is moving forward with the required survey work, proposed paving plan, and further defining the county and city right of ways along Commerce. The City Engineer feels that if the applicant keeps working on the process they should have no trouble completing paving by the time specified in the proposed resolution. Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. and upon no comments being heard, closed the hearing at 7:48 p.m. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution was amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-93: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT WHICH ALLOWS OPERATION OF MAHOGANY BAY AT 2642 COMMERCE BOULEVARD, P & Z CASE #02-34, PID #22-112-21-14-0008 7. ACTION ON REQUEST BY GILLESPIE CENTER TO WAIVE CHARGES Mayor Meisel stated she will abstain from voting on this issue because she is on the Foundation Board. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to waive the $6891.39 in fees that the Gillespie Center for land use planning costs incurred during the development of the center. Those voting in favor: Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer. Those voting against: None. Mayor Meisel abstained from voting. Motion carried. 8. TODD CHRISTOPHERSON OF AMCON ON PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY Christopherson updated the Council on bid results, product schedule and how design is progressing. On September 4th, bids were opened for the first six contracts. He recommends rejecting bids 2-6 based on the decision to delay the project until March. He recommends accepting Bid 1 for the demolition because the Iow bidder has verified that they will hold the bid price until March 1. 2 -4647- Mound City Council Minutes - September 24, 2002 The plan is to complete the new plans and specs by November 5th and issue bids as one package, to open on December 4th, They will be brought to the Council at their first meeting in December. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to award C01 to Mac Steininger at a bid price of $37,200. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to reject C02-06 from bid package 1, to rebid this package November 5. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. Case #02-16/36 - Kelly & Veronica Johnson - 2331 Driftwood Lane - Minor Subdivision, Hardcover Variance Loren Gordon reviewed the application for a minor subdivision to receive a portion of property from the adjacent property at 4815 Bartlett Blvd. This adjustment will allow the applicants to include the gravel drive area that is located almost wholly within their property. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-94: RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND HARDCOVER VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2331 DRIFTWOOD LANE. P&Z CASE #02-16 AND 02-36. B. Case #02-30/33 - Steve Bedell/Charles & Alice MacNamara - 5925 Ridqewood Road - Waiver of Plattinq, Variance. Sarah Smith reviewed the request for waiver of platting, submitted in order to create a new "buildable" parcel on the west side. The applicants are also requesting a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming setback of 8.5 feet on the east side oalong the unimproved public parkway. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-95: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE REQUEST FROM STEVE AND LYNN BEDELL AND CHARLES AND ALICE MACNAMARA FOR WAIVER OF PLATTING AND VARIANCE APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 6, THE HIGHLANDS, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA INTO TWO (2) LOTS. P&Z CASE #02-30 AND #02-33. PID #23-117-24-43-0039. 3 -4648- Mound City Council Minutes - September 24, 2002 10. REQUEST FROM TIM BECKER AND DALE AND LORELL BECKER TO REZONE LOTS 5-8~ BLOCK 4, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES FROM R-1 TO 4- lA. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-96: RESOLUTION TO DENY THE REQUEST FROM 'riM BECKER AND DALE AND LOP, ELL BECKER TO REZONE LOTS 5-8, BLOCK 4, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO R-lA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. P&Z CASE #02-16, PID #13-117-24-22.0046 - 0050 - 0051 AND 0052. 11. PROPOSED REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT- ANTHONY'S FLORAL Loren Gordon reiterated the history and background of the proposed amendment, stating that the proposed rezoning and comprehensive plan amendments were undertaken for consistency and to be in conformance with Minnesota State Statutes. Brown stated he would be in favor of R1 by the lake and R2 by Commerce, but not in favor of changing anything until there's a proposed plan for the area. Osmek agreed with the split zoning idea, but leaving it is as for the present because of the current commercial use. Hanus and Meisel also concur with the split zoning aspect, but not doing anything at the current time because of lack of a proposed plan for the area. Meyer expressed that the Comprehensive Plan states, that no matter how you look at it, there is a shortage of park land and feels that the lake side of this parcel should be considered for additional park land. Residents of Dutch Lake spoke in favor of the R1 at the lake side and R2 along the street side and wanted and suggested the council make a motion to leave the current business as is and give support in the future of the R1/R2 split. Meisel stated that's why the consensus of the Council was noted in the minutes. Hanus also commented that even if this council made that motion, it would not bind future councils. A petition was received by the City with signatures of property owners against the Comprehensive Plan change and rezoning of Anthony's Floral property to high density. City Attorney John Dean stated that there is the option of not doing anything at this time. He is not speaking in support, but it is currently zoned B1, which allows the current user to do what he's doing at the moment. Even though there is a mismatch in the current zoning and comp plan, no one is forcing that issue at this time. The Council could decide not to take any action until some sort of proposal is presented. Council consensus is not to take any action at this time. 4 -4649- Mound City Council Minutes - September 24, 2002 12. CASE #02-35 - CITY OF MOUND - LOTS 23-28~ KOEHLER'S ADDITION - WAIVER OF PLATTING MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-97: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE WAIVER OF PLATTING TO SUBDIVIDE LOTS 23-28, KOEHLER'S ADDITION FROM BALBOA PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5300 SHORELINE DRIVE AND CREATE A NEW TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR THE PARCEL TO BE SUBDIVIDED AND SOLD TO THE CITY OF MOUND. PID #13-117.24-34-0100. P&Z CASE #02-35 13. WESTEDGE BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-98: RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON WESTEDGE BOULEVARD PROJECT MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-99: RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR WESTEDGE BOULEVARD PROJECT 14. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER V, SECTION 1000 - NUISANCE ABATEMENT After discussion and comment by City Prosecutor Craig Mertz and the Council and a concerned resident, it was the decision that the council will submit their suggestions for changes in the nuisance ordinance to city staff for consideration. Staff will compile these suggestions and bring back to the Council in the next 6 weeks to 2 months. 15. SET SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOPS MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to set a special meeting with the City of Orono to discuss the fire contract on October 3, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to set a budget workshop for October 24, 2002 at 6:30 p.m. Staff doesn't have to be present at this meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 16. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS a. Correspondence: Mound Westonka Schools b. Report: Charitable gambling proceeds c. Report: Finance Department through August 2002 5 -4650- Mound City Council Minutes - September 24, 2002 d. Report: Redevelopment Project Team e. LMCC Oct Schedule f. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative 17. ADJOURN MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 10:07 p.m. Motion carried. All voted in favor. Attest:Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 6 -4651 - OCTOBER 8, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 092502SUE $5,695.87 SEPT 092602SU E $81.59 SEPT 100102SUE $22.00 OCT 100202SU E $1,825.92 OCT 100802SUE $250,735.52OCT TOTAL $258,360.90 -4652- CtTY OF MOUND Payments Page 1 Current Period: September 2002 Batch Name 092502SUE User Dollar Amt $5,695.87 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $5,695.87 Refer 92502 HARDINA, DAMON $0.00 In Balance 9/25/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $472.23 Invoice 092302 Transaction Date 9/23/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $472.23 Refer 92502 HEITZ, FRANK 9/25/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 092502 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $684.64 Invoice 092402 Transaction Date 9/24/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $834.64 Refer 92502 PETTY CASH 9/25/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $91.08 Invoice 092502 PO 17449 Transaction Date 9/24/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $91.08 Refer 92502 RAHN, JODI L. 9/25/2002 '-;ash Payment .hvoice 092402 :)n Date G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents 9/24/2002 REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $4,278.35 Total $4,278.35 Refer 92502 SCHWALBE, VERNON AND DELOR Cash Payment Invoice 092502 Transaction Date E 101-41410-430 Miscellaneous 9/23/2002 9/25/2002 REIMBURSE MEAL EXPENSE $19.57 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $19.57 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $5,695.87 $5,695.87 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $5,695.87 $5,695.87 -4653- CITY OF MOUND Payments 09/26/02 11:22 AM Page 1 Current Period: September 2002 Batch Name 092602SUE User Dollar Amt $81.59 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $81.59 $0.00 In Balance Refer 92602 PETTY CASH 9126/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous NELSON EVENT $35.14 Invoice 092602 Cash Payment E 101-41310-322 Postage POSTAGE $1.60 Invoice 092602 Cash Payment E 101-41410-322 Postage POSTAGE $18.50 Invoice 092602 Cash Payment E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training MEETING SUPPLIES $25.75 invoice 092602 Cash Payment E 101-41310-322 Postage POSTAGE $0.60 Invoice 092602 Transaction Date 9/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $81.59 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $81.59 $81.59 Pre-Written Check CheCks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $81.59 $81.59 -4654- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 10:26 AM Page 1 Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 100102SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $22.00 Posted Refer 100102 Cash Payment Invoice 100102 PO 17502 Transaction Date 10/112002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou Fund Summary 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 670 RECYCLING FUND $22.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Ck# 008411 10/1/2002 E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services RECYCLE APPLIANCE $22.00 10100 Total $22.00 BATCH Total $22.00 $22.00 Pre-Written Check $22.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $22.00 -4655- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 3:34 PM Pa~e 1 Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 100202SUE User Dollar Amt $1,825.92 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,825.92 $0.00 Refer 100202 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA 10/2/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 08-02 472-3093 Invoice 090102 Transaction Date 9/27/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $276.98 In Balance Total $276.98 Refer 100202 GRAND, DEB 10/2/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $81.00 Invoice 092602 Transaction Date 9/27/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $81.00 Refer 100202 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA 10/2/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 10-16-02 LUEDKE invoice 100202 Cash Payment E 609-49750-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 10-16-02 GRAND Invoice Transaction Date 9/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $15.00 $15.00 Total $30.00 Refer 100202 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment ., .,nvoice 092602 Transaction Date E 101-42110~321 Telephone & Cells 10/1/2002 10/2/2002 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES $458.37 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $458.37 Refer 100202 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (POL Cash Payment invoice 092602 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels 10/2/2002 THRU 09-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $979.57 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $979.57 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $1,518.94 $306.98 $1,825.92 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $1,825.92 $1,825.92 -4656- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 100802SUE User Dollar Amt $250,735.52 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $250,735.52 Refer 100802 A-1 RENTAL OF LAKE MINNETONK $0.00 In Balance 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous EE APPRECIATION EVENT $36.07 Invoice 0100450 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous EE APPRECIATION EVENT $197.56 Invoice 0096435 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $233.63 Refer 100802 ALERT-ALL CORPORATION 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-217 Fire Prevention Supplies CHILDREN GIVE-AWAYS $2,170.00 invoice 2090826 PO 17349 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,170.00 Refer 100802 ALPHA VIDEO AND AUDIO, INCOR 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings AUDIONIDEO SERVICE CALL $125.00 Invoice SVCINV01900 Transaction Date 9/23/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 100802 AMCON Cash Payment nvoice 2436 Date E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 9/24/2002 10/8/2002 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $10,594.25 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10,594.25 Refer 100802 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE .10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice DC226611 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice DC226012 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou Refer 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 091302 Cash Payment Invoice 091302 Cash Payment Invoice 091302 ASPEN EMBROIO yA / 'i%/2002 E 281-45210-110 Clothing Allowance CLOTHING, WlDMER, DENIOE E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING, WIDMER, DENICE E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING, WIDMER, DENIOE $167.40 $187.80 10100 Total $355.20 $24.63 $49.26 $49.26 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $123.15 Refer 100802 BELLBOY CORPORATION 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,189.90 Invoice 24689100 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,080.80 Invoice 24636900 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,550.05 Invoice 24591100 ~,ash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$99.00 23863600-B Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,721,75 Refar 100802 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 10/8/2002 -4657- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page 2 Current Period: October 2002 .-~ ~ ..... ~~-- ~,~r ~ ,~ ~ ! __ - .... Cash Payment E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE $35.00 Invoice 309279 Cash Payment E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE $17'.50 Invoice 309279 Cash Payment E 101-42400-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE $17.50 Invoice 309279 Transaction_. Date 9/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $70.00 ~:i 00802 CHAMPION AUTO .10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SPARK PLUG $12.72 Invoice D162677 Transaction Date 9/23/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $12.72 Refer 100802 CHIEFS POLICE ASSOC MINNESO 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract MULTI JURISDICTION NETVVORK $83.33 ORGANIZATION Invoice 1135 Transaction Date 9/27/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $83.33 Refer 100802 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST ...10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $144.32 Invoice 61374258 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $144.32 ,~efer 100802 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply DIAPHRAM, FLIPPER Invoice 37489-A Transaction Date 9/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 196583 Cash Payment invoice 192767 Cash Payment Invoice 192758 Cash Payment invoice 191993 Cash Payment Invoice 191985 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 190350-B Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Refer 100802 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment Invoice 303519 Cash Payment Invoice 301933 Cash Payment }voice 300540 dash Payment Invoice 298985 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER CREDIT-BEER Ma~ue~e Bank Mou 10/8/2002 BEER BEER BEER BEER 10100 $123.85 Total $123.85 $1,050.05 $15.40 $1,986.65 $18.40 $1,186.40 -$96.90 Total $4,160.00 $1,013.80 $289.00 $1,734.00 $48.00 -4658- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page 3 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $42.30 Invoice 297582 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,266.97 invoice 297581 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,394.07 Refer 100802 EMCO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORAT 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies GEAR CLEANER $77.64 Invoice 908 PO 17342 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $77,64 Refer 100802 ESS (ELECTION EQUIPMENT) 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41410-400 Repairs & Maint Contract ELECTION EQUIPMENT $79.89 Invoice 491889 Cash Payment E 101-41410-400 Repairs & Maint Contract ELECTION EQUIPMENT $77.31 Invoice 491901 Transaction Date 9/24/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $157.20 Refer 100802 EXTREME BEVERAGE 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00 Invoice 78334 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $32.00 '~efer 100802 G & K SERVICES 10/8/2002 ,;ash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-17-02 UNIFORMS $9,38 Invoice 335559 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-17-02 UNIFORMS $9.38 Invoice 335559 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-17-02 UNIFORMS $9,38 Invoice 335559 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 09-17-02 MATS $30.57 Invoice 335559 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 09-17-02 MATS $30.57 Invoice 335559 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 09-17-02 MATS $30.56 Invoice 335559 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 09-17-02 MATS $45.90 Invoice 335562 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 10-01-02 MATS $53.27 Invoice 349538 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 09-17-02 MATS $104.70 Invoice 335561 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 09-03-02 MATS $21.29 Invoice 321657 Cash Payment E 222-42250-216 Cleaning Supplies 10-01-02 MATS $44.55 Invoice 349540 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 10-01-02 MATS $83.96 Invoice 349539 '~ash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 09-17-02 MATS $21.29 ~voice 335563 E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 10-01-02 MATS $21.29 invoice 349541 -4659- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10102/02 11:21 AM Page 4 Current Period: October 2002 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 I"11 __~ Total $516.09 Refer 100802 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR Invoice 596928 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 602722 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 602613 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR invoice 599741 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 599740 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 599511 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 100802 HASSE, CKLAIR Cash Payment E 101-41410-430 Miscellaneous invoice 100802 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 ? ~'ash Payment Invoice 083102 Transaction Date E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 9/24/2002 -$45.56 $1,272.90 $550.66 $38.72 $107.16 $814.09 10/8/2002 REIMBURSE EXPENSE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 10/8/2002 08-02 BOOKING FEE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,736.97 $12,77 Total $12.77 $292.84 Total $292.84 Refer 100802 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment Invoice 1458071 Cash Payment Invoice 1458070 Cash Payment Invoice 1458069 Transaction Date E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale 10/2/2002 10/8/2002 WINE WINE LIQUOR Marquette Bank Mou 10100 To~l $132,30 $84.90 $166.00 $383.20 Refer 100802 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment Invoice 092302 Cash Payment Invoice 100802 Transaction Date E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 9/24/2002 10/812002 BAGS FOR PERMITS COUNCIL COOKIES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $20.96 $51.90 $72.86 Refer Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs Invbice 53334-A Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 Invoice 53334-B1 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs "3voice 53334-B2 ,Ash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development Invoice 53334-B3 100802 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN 10/8/2002 08-02 HRA MISCELLANEOUS BILLABLE 08-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 08-02 REDEVEOPMENT PROJECT #1 08-02 MHR DEVELOPMENT $176.00 $33.00 $473.00 $55.00 -4660- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Pacje 5 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 POST OFFICE RELOCATION $301.86 Invoice 53334-C Cash Payment E 354-43140-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 DEFICIENCE AGREEMENT $2,300.00 Invoice 53334-D Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 08-02 MHR DEVELOPMENT $330.00 Invoice 53334-E Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings 08-02 NEW LIQUOR STORE $345.20 Invoice 53337-A Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PUBLIC EMERGENCY BLDG $517.52 Invoice 53337-B Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 ANDERSON LAW SUIT $215.00 Invoice 53337-C Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 WELL SITE LAND PURCHASE $281.00 Invoice 53337-D Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 XCEL LINE RELOCATION $180.00 Invoice 53337-E Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE $1,492.71 Invoice 53337-F Cash Payment G 101-22890 2957 Cambridge Retain Wall 08-02 2957 CAMBRIDGE RETAINING WALL $1,272.00 Invoice 53337-G Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 EXECUTIVE $1,392.00 ~voice 53337-H Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 ELECTION MISCELLANEOUS $144.00 Invoice 53337-1 Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $1,932.00 Invoice 63337-J1 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 RETAINING WALL ISSUES $24.00 Invoice 5337-J2 Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 PUBLIC SAFETY MISC ISSUE $60.00 Invoice 53337-J3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 SKAALERUD ISSUES $481.33 Invoice 53337-K1 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 STREETS MISCELLANEOUS $73.11 Invoice 53337K2a Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 WATER MISCELLANEOUS $73.11 Invoice 53337K2b Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 SEWER MISCELLANEOUS $73,11 Invoice 53337K2c Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 RETAINING WALLS $127.33 Invoice 53337-K3 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT $1,766,74 Invoice 53389 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 08-02 METRO PLAINS $18.00 Invoice 53337 Cash Payment G 101-22897 6400 cry Rd 15 Hentges Sub 08-02 HENTGES DEVELOPMENT $138.00 Invoice 53337 Cash Payment G 101-22857 Three Points, Becker Proper[ 08-02 BECKER ISSUES $324.00 ~voice 53337 Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING $504,00 Invoice 53337 -4661 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page 6 Current Period: October 2002 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15,104-.02 Refer 100802 KETCHER, DONALD 10/8/2002 Cash Payment R 101-34110 Depot Rental REFUND DEPOT RENTAL Invoice 100802 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 $225.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $225.00 Refer 100802 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment Invoice 092302 Transaction Date E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins 9/25/2002 10/8/2002 PLOW TRUCK HIT POLE $1,000.00 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,000.00 Refer 100802 LOWELL'S AUTOMOTIVE 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair MISCELLANEOUS AUTO SUPPLIES invoice 5-341230 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair FINANCE CHARGE Invoice 39970 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair MISCELLANEOUS AUTO SUPPLIES Invoice 5-345414 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair MISCELLANEOUS AUTO SUPPLIES Invoice 5-345721 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair FINANCE CHARGE !nvoice 40183 .;ash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair MISCELLANEOUS AUTO SUPPLIES invoice 5-348384 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair FINANCE CHARGE Invoice 40361 Transaction Date 9/23/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5.96 $0.71 $27.99 $22.73 $0.06 $16.25 $0.57 $74.27 Refer 100802 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 461083 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 458678 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 456155-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 451460-B Transaction Date 10/2/2002 10/8/2002 BEER BEER CREDIT-BEER CREDIT-BEER Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,701.20 $1,4O8.O5 -$0.04 -$6.40 $3,102.81 Refer 100802 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment Invoice 11492 Cash Payment Invoice 61 Cash Payment Invoice 11520 Cash Payment Invoice 11541 ansaction Date E 609-49750-265 Freight E 609-49750-265 Freight E 609-49750-265 Freight E 609-49750-265 Freight 10/2/2002 10/8/2002 09-03-02 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-06-02 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-06-02 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-12-02 DELIVERY CHARGE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $35.20 $133.70 $23.20 $179.80 $371.90 Refer 100802 METRO FIRE 1018/2002 -4662- CITY OF MOUND 0/02 0z Page 7 Payments Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies LEATHER FRONT $75.25 Invoice 11108 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $75.25 Refer 100802 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 10-02 WASTEWATER $48,974.50 Invoice 0000744146 Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 09-02 SAC CHARGES $1,188.00 Invoice 093002 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50,162.50 Refer 100802 MEYER, PETER Cash Payment Invoice 091502 Transaction Date E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense 9/30/2002 Refer 100802 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601-49400-470Water Samples Invoice 136464 10/8/2002 REIMBURSE MEETING EXPENSE $100.70 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $100.70 10/8/2002 COLIFORM, MF - WATER $72.50 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $72.50 Refer 100802 MINNETRISTA, CITY OF 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR SMART TRAILER $50.84 nvoice 1123 Transaction Date 9/27/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.84 Refer 100802 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO 10/8/2002 Cash Payment R 895-33401 Local Government Aid-State 2002 STATE FIRE AID Invoice 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 100802 Transaction Date E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 10/1/2002 10-02 FIRE RELIEF Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $84,816.00 $9,033.88 Total $93,849.88 Refer 100802 MOUND, CITY OF 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities 08-02 WATER AND SEWER Invoice 100802 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 100802 NICCUMDOCKS, INCORPORATED 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-440 Other Contractual Servic RAISE DOCKS Invoice 1920 Transaction Date 9/23/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $20.20 Total $20.20 $1,189.50 Total $1,189.50 Refer 100802 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPP 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts METER $269.08 Invoice 3136342 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $269.08 Refer 100802 NOVA COMMUNICATIONS 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells SERVICE CALL FAX MACHINE $100.00 Invoice 1347 Oransaction Date 10/1/2002 R~ef~'PARS~NS ~LECTRIC Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $100.00 10/8/2002 -4663- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page 8 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings NETWORK SERVICE $336.73 invoice 52108 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $336.73 Refer 100802 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINECOMPA 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $675.00 Invoice 0198480-1N Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $675.00 Refer 100802 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 36976008 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 32517504 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $46.40 $194.50 10100 Total $240.90 Refer 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 874017 Cash Payment Invoice 874016 Cash Payment ~nvoice 874015 iash Payment Invoice 874014 Transaction Date E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609~49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale 10/2/2002 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC 10/8/2002. E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX WINE LIQUOR LIQUOR Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $93.00 $620.50 $940.07 $0.00 $1,653.57 Rear Cash Payment Invoice 1169 Cash Payment Invoice 917 Cash Payment Invoice 702 Transaction Date 100802 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 10/8/2002 E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CREDIT-CIGARETTES E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $538.00 -$33.15 $932.47 $1,437.32 Refer 100802 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale invoice 172527-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 172526-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 172114-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 172061-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 170029-00 Cash Payment E invoice 169847-00 ,~sh Payment E ,~voice 169316-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 169315-00 10/8/2002 LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $1,531.64 $62.67 $1,500.17 $76.05 $138.50 $69.00 $1,023.32 $36.12 -4664- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM PaQe 9 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $27.00 Invoice 166859-00 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,464.47 Refer 100802 RANDY'S SANITATATION 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 09-02 SANITATY SERVICE $114.54 Invoice 1776 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $114.54 Refer 1E+06 RELIANT ENERGY 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-000-053-000 $25.10 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-001-095-800 $53.38 invoice 100802 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-001-833-500 $15.98 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-001-852-100 $39.43 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-001-853-000 $42.64 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-001-972-603 $19.95 Invoice 100802 r~aSh Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-001-972-603 $10.88 invoice 100802 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 07-19-02 THRU 08-20-02 #543-001-972-603 $14.50 invoice 100802 Transaction Date 9/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $221.86 Refer 100802 RITTER, BONNIE Cash Payment Invoice 100802 Transaction Date E 101-41410-430 Miscellaneous 9/25/2002 10/8/2002 REIMBURSE EXPENSE $27.10 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $27.10 Refer 100802 ROBERTS, COLLETTE Cash Payment invoice 092302 Cash Payment invoice 092302 Transaction Date E 101-41500-331 Use of personal auto E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins 9/24/2002 10/8/2002 REIMBURSE MILEAGE REIMBURSE TORN CLOTHING $12.04 $39.99 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $52.03 Refer 100802 SCHWAAB, INCORPORATED Cash Payment Invoice L64400 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 ash Payment ,nvo~ce L64715 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies 10/8/2002 STAMP PRE-INK $69.36 STAMP PRE-INK $20.03 STAMP PRE-INK $20.03 STAMP PRE-INK $20.03 STAMP PRE-INK, NOTARY STAMP $55.61 STAMP PRE-INK $20.03 -4665- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page I0 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 Cash Payment Invoice L64715 Transaction Date Current Period: October 2002 III ' · !1!I:.! !_ 'Ir'Il [11 E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies STAMP PRE-INK E $09-49750-200 Office Supplies E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies 9/25/2002 STAMP PRE-INK STAMP PRE-INK STAMP PRE-INK Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6.68 $6.69 $10.02 $1o.o2 $238.50 Refer 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 100802 Transaction Date SERVICE MASTER CLEAN . .1. 0/8/2002 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 10-02 CLEANING SERVICE E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-02 CLEANING SERVICE E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-02 CLEANING SERVICE E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-02 CLEANING SERVICE 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 100802 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE iash Payment E 101-45200-533Tree Removal Invoice 4235 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal Invoice 4234 Transaction Date 9/24/2002 Refer 100802 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment Invoice 64129 Cash Payment invoice 91902 Cash Payment Invoice 64154 Transaction Date E 222-42260-350 Pdnting E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies 9/30~2002 10/8/2002 WILDHURST TREE REMOVAL 4577 IVD TREE REMOVAL Marquette Bank Mou 10100 10/8/2002 LAMINATION SIGNS LAMINATION SIGNS BIND PROPOSALS Marquette Bank Mou Refer 100802 Cash Payment Invoice 083102 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Refer 100802 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment Invoice 7126 Cash Payment Invoice 7126 $1,096.95 $39.05 $39.05 $39.05 Total $1,214.10 $1,022.40 $899.93 Total $1,922.33 $13.87 $3.96 $7.46 10100 Total $25.29 STAR-WEST CHEVROLET/OLDS 10/8/2002 E 101-42110-404 Repaira/Maint Machinery AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS E 601-49400-700 Transfers $6,41 10100 Total $6,41 $212.72 $212.72 E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs Marquette Bank Mou 10/8/2002 CONTROL PANEL CONTROL PANEL Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou "1oo8o " - " Refer 10/8/2002 ,,ash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERY, RECHARABLE Invoice 317441.1 Transaction Date 9/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou -10100 10100 Total $425.44 $33.52 To~l $33.52 -4666- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/07./02 11:21 AM Page 11 Current Period: October 2002 Refer 100802 STS CONSULTANTS Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs $878.00 Invoice 234902 Transaction Date 9~30/2002 10100 Total $878.00 Refer 100802 THORPE DISTRIBUTINGCOMPAN Cash Payment $1,398.30 Invoice 275045 Cash Payment $10,857.00 Invoice 275044 Cash Payment $5,307.65 Invoice 274418 Cash Payment $38.55 Invoice 274417 Cash Payment $97.00 Invoice 235009 Cash Payment $563.00 Invoice 234507 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $18,261.50 Refer 100802 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLAENOUS SUPPLIES $14.06 hvoice 203916 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $14.06 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/8/2002 THRU 09-07-02 MAXVVELL PROPERTY Ma~uette Bank Mou 10/~2002 BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER Refer 100802 TOP GUN CONTRACTORS 10/8/2002 Cash Payment G 101-20800 Due to Other Governments REFUND PERMIT FEE Invoice 16366 Cash Payment R 101-32210 Building Permits REFUND PERMIT FEE Invoice 16366 Transaction Date 9/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $2.00 $97.25 Total $99.25 Refer 100802 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 10-22-02 THRU 10-22-03 MAINTENANCE $1,780.00 AGREEMENT Invoice 13984 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,780,00 s ................... ..... Refer 100802 TRAINING OF 0 CERS, AS OCI 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 10-28-02 THRU 10-02-02 BURKE TRAINING $375,00 Invoice 4046 Transaction Date 9/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $375.00 Refer 100802 TRUE VALUE, MOUND 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $36,49 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $23,28 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $208,73 Invoice 083102 ~sh Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $159.25 083102 -4667- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page 12 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $160.55 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $160.55 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $160.53 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $8.37 invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $21.26 invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $43.39 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $54.50 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 609-49750-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $8.07 Invoice 083102 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 08-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $150.79 invoice 083102 Transaction Date 9/27/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,193.76 Refer 100802 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies nvo~ce 358187-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 35818743 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 356989-0 PO 17444 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies invoice 359354-0 PO 17378 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies invoice 359030-0 PO 17377 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358758-0 PO 17376 ~sh Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies ,flvoice 358588-0 PO 17376 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358415,0 10/8/2002 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES FOOTREST, ETC CLIPS, PENS, ETC INK JET CARTRIDGE INDEX, ETC BINDERS, COVERS MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $14.12 $14.12 $14.12 $14.12 $14.12 $4.71 $4.71 $7.06 $7.03 $126.92 $35.51 $129.88 $149.42 $22.28 $11.31 -4668- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Pag~ 13 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200Office Supplies Invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358415-0 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358505-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358505-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies nvoice 358505-0 Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-1 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-1 Transaction Date 10/2/2002 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.31 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES CHAIR, STAPLER, ETC CHAIR. STAPLER, ETC CHAIR, STAPLER, ETC MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $11.31 $11.31 $11.31 $3.77 $3.77 $5.65 $5.63 $65.71 $131.42 $131.42 $3.91 $3.91 $3.91 $3.91 $3.91 $1.30 $1.30 $1,96 $1.98 Tote I $986.13 Refer 100802 UNIFORMS L/M/TED 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies TASER CARTRIDGES $211.18 Invoice 140678 PO 17448 Transaction Date 9/24/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $211.18 ~,efer 100802 WA TEROUS COMPANY 10/8/2002 ~sh Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair CONTROL HANDLE KIT $86.23 P238147 PO 17350 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $86.23 -4669- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02102 11:21 AM Page 14 Current Period: October 2002 Refer 100802 WIDMER, INCORPORATED 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract REPLACE GATE VALVE $942.50 Invoice 5569 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 3 STAND PIPES $942.50 Invoice 5570 Transaction Date Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,885.00 Refer 100802 10/8/2002 Cash Payment 08-02 #2245-301-939 $1,544.11 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 ~O466-607-223 $21.99 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 #1914-601-425 $640.76 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 #0217-606-329 $3,710.32 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 #2184-407-147 $459.36 invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 #0047-005-229 $221.28 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 ~O864-508-832 $154.43 ~,gvoice 100802 ~ash Payment 08-02 ~0864-508-832 $154.43 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 ~0864-508-832 $154,42 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 ~O018-802-634 $2,208.42 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment 08-02 #0009-604-835 $346.51 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment CREDIT #0542-505-000-274 -$135.02 Invoice 100802 Transaction Date 9/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $9,481.01 Refer 100802 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 10/8/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies MEDICAL SUPPLIES $32.00 invoice 54081658 Transaction Date 9/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $32.00 9/25/2002 XCEL ENERGY E 101-41910-381 Electdc Utilities E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities E 609-49750-381 Electdc Utilities E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities E 101-43100-38t Electric Utilities E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities -4670- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/02/02 11:21 AM Page 15 Current Period: October 2002 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 354 Commerce Place Tif 1-1 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $16,642.41 $3,698.52 $1,279.84 $2,300.00 $13,256.49 $2,541.60 $5,265.45 $55,312.73 $55,095.89 $1,492.71 $93,849.88 $250,735.52 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0,00 $250,735.52 $250,735.52 -4671 - OCTOBER 22~ 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 010902SUE $6,734.95 OCT 101602SUE $4,953.87 OCT 101702SUE $20.00 OCT 101802S U E$900.00 OCT 102202S U E$204,934.32OCT TOTAL $217,543.14 -4672- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/10/02 9:50 AM Page 1 Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 100902SUE User Dollar Amt $6,734.95 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $6,734.95 $0o00 In Balance Refer 100902 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101--41910-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-0600 $1,131.68 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-3093 $272.54 invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-0635 $343.57 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-0635 $343.57 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-0635 $343.58 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 472-0621 $763.18 invoice 093002 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,198.12 Refer i0~'~' ~i~C~U~'~ ~-REA~E~ i~)i9i~0(~2 Cash Payment G 202-20800 Due to Other Governments REVOLVING FUND 01-02 THRU 12-02 $701.04 Invoice 100902 I'ransaction Date 10/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $701.04 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101~45200-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #23 KESTNER, AL 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #20 GRADY, DAN 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #22 HEITZ, DON 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #18 HARDINA, DAMON 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #17 POUNDER, CHRIS 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #16 JOHNSON, TIM 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #19 KIVISTO, SCOTT 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES #21 HEITZ, FRANK 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-6740 BERENT, BRIAN $38.17 $38,17 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 $38,17 $39.71 $38,17 $26.02 -4673- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/10/02 9:50 AM Page 2 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- $16.99 Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment .nvoice 100902 Cash Payment invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 Cash Payment invoice 100902 Cash Payment Invoice 100902 .;ash Payment Invoice 100902 E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 221-6794 TAFFE, JOHN 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 221-6811 #07 SKINNER, 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 221-6811 #07 SKINNER, 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 221-6811 #07 SKINNER, CELL PHONES 612- $54.43 GREG CELL PHONES 612- $54.43 GREG CELL PHONES 612- $54.42 GREG 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-6812 #15 FACKLER, JIM 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-6813 HOFF, KATIE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-6814 #03 RAHN, JODI 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-6822 #02 NELSON, JOYCE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-6822 #02 NELSON, JOYCE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-6822 #02 NELSON, JOYCE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 221-8385 SWARTZER, BRIAN $143.02 $45.83 $38.83 $13.07 $13.07 $13.07 $39.21 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- $39.21 292-1182 GEISE, LEE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 282-3599 ANDERSON, MIKE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 282-5889 SIMONEAU, MATT 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 612- 363-5883 NORLANDER, JILL 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 952- 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 952- 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE 08-19-02 THRU 09-18-02 CELL PHONES 952- 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE $39.21 $80.48 $33.67 $7.77 $15.33 $15.33 -4674- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/10/02 9;50 AM Page 3 Current Period: October 2002 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1 050.29 Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $222.27 Invoice 092602 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $222.27 Refer 100902 SPEEDWAYSUPERAMERICA (p~ 10/9}20~"2 Cash Payment E 101~3100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $625.56 Invoice 092602 Cash Payment E 601~9400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $262.04 Invoice 092602 Cash Payment E 60249450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $254.69 Invoice 092602 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,142.29 R';fer 1009~2 sPEEDwAYsuP~RAMERICA (PAR 10/9/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $381.30 Invoice 100902 Cash Payment E 101-42400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $39.64 Invoice 100902 Transaction Date 10/1/2002 MarqueEe Bank Mou 10100 Total $420 94 Fund Summa~ lOl GENERAL FUND 202 COMMUNITY DEV BLK GRANT 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $3,883.33 $701.04 $222.27 $53.60 $843.20 $758.97 $272.54 $6,734.95 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $6,734.95 $6,734.95 -4675- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 9:44 AM Page 1 Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 101602SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $4,953.87 Posted Refer 101602 GIESE, LEROY Ck#008505 10/16/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE Invoice 101302 Transaction Date 10/14/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 101602 AT&T Ck#008503 10/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 09-02 (952)250-0429 Invoice 0926-02 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $159.99 Total $159.99 $33.80 Total $33.80 Refer 101602 PLYMOUTH, CITY OF Ck# 008509 10/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous PLEAATRAINING 11-13-02 $21.00 Invoice 101102 PO 17508 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous PLEAATRAINING 11-14-02 $21.00 Invoice 101102 PO 17508 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $42.00 Refer 101602 VERIZONWIRELESS Ck# 008512 10/16/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 750-2666 FIRE CHIEF $22.28 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 590-4351 P/W $6.95 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 590-4351 P/W $6.95 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 296-9058 FINANCE $8.39 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 723-7560 MOUND FIRE $0.98 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 751-3572 ENGINE #18 $1.14 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 751-3573 MOUND FIRE $1.30 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCK $8.39 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 590-4351 P/W $6.95 Invoice 101602 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $63.33 Refer 101602 FACKLER, JAMES Ck# 008504 10/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $147.84 Invoice 100902 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $147.84 Refer 101602 HANSON, KANDIS Ck# 008506 10/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE EXPENSE $977.41 Invoice 092402 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells DSL LINE $49.95 Invoice 092402 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,027.36 -4676- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 9:44. AM Page 2 Current Period: October 2002 Refer 101602 ROBERTS, COLLETTE Ck# 008510 10/16/2002 Cash Payment G 10%21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $167.16 Invoice 100802 Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE $650.00 Invoice 100802 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1 017.16 Refer 101602 NICCUM, DANIEL Ck# 008508 10/16/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE SEMINAR $68.96 Invoice 101402 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE SEMINAR $157.95 Invoice 101402 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $226.91 Refer 101602 MINNESOTA, STATE TREASURER Ck# 008507 10/16/2002 Cash Payment G 101-20800 Due to Other Governments 3RD QTR GEN BLDG PERMITS $1,990.48 Invoice 093002 Transaction Date 10/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1 990.48 ~efer 101~0~ ~A~E, ~i7'~ ~ - Ak#~11 i0ii6/~0~)~ Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $35.00 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $35.00 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $35.00 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $35.00 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $35.00 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $35.00 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $11.66 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $11.67 Invoice 101602 Cash Payment 10-30-02 MUNICIPALS $11.67 Invoice 101602 Transaction Date 10/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $245 00 E 609-49750--434 Conference & Training E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training E 609-49750-434 Conference & Training E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training E 101~41500-434 Conference & Training E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training -4677- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 9:44 AM Page 3 Current Period: October 2002 Fund Summary BATCH Total $4,953.87 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $4,617.56 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $69.09 601 WATER FUND $178.61 602 SEWER FUND $18.61 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $70.00 $4,953.87 Pre-Written Check $4,953.87 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $4,953.87 -4678- GITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 9:44 AM Page 1 Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 101702SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $20.00 Posted Refer 101702 BURNSVILLE, CITYOF Ck#008513 10/17/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION G-PRS invoice 101702 Transaction Date 10/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $20.00 Total $20.00 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $2o.oo $2O.OO BATCH Total $20.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $20.00 $0.00 $20.00 -4679- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 9:44 AM Page 1 Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 101802SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $900.00 Posted Refer 101802 PEDERSON, GREG Ck# 008515 10/17/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ADVANCE ST. CLOUD CHIEF CONFERENCE $450.00 invoice 101602 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $450.00 Refer 101802 PALM, MICHAEL Ck# 008514 10/17/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ADVANCE ST CLOUD CHIEF CONFERENCE $450.00 invoice 101602 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $450.00 Fund Summary 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $900.00 $900.00 BATCH Total $900.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $900.00 $o.oo $900.00 -4680- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 1 Current Period: October 2002 Batch Name 102202SUE User Dollar Amt $204,934.32 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $204,934.32 $0.00 In Balance Refer 102202 AMCON 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $20,200.66 Invoice 2441 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $20,200.66 Refer 102202 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSO 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $62.00 Invoice 20000206476 Cash Payment E 602-49450-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $62.00 Invoice 20000206476 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $124.00 Refer 102202 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS,/NCO 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. CHARGER, ETC $93.13 Invoice 30795 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $93.13 Refer 102202 ANTHONYS FLORAL 10/22/2002 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials PLANT $15.00 Cash Payment Invoice 17961 Cash Payment Invoice 17961 Cash Payment Invoice 17961 Transaction Date E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials PLANT $15.00 PLANT $15.00 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $45.00 Refer 102202 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $67.20 Invoice DC228110 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $156.28 Invoice DC227511 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $223.48 Refer 102202 ARMOR WASTE SYSTEMS 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs ROLL-OFF $310.00 Invoice 29600046 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $310.00 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract CARPET CLEANING $159.75 Invoice 2345 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Mou 10100 Total ?.1~9 .75Marquette Bank Refer 102202 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY 10/22/200~ Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA MASTER CONTROL SYSTEM $20,747.27 Invoice 13107S PO 17325 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $20 747.27 R;fer 1~2°2' BE~L~'~)~RATI~ -4681 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 2 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,876.25 Invoice 24738200 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS $143.61 Invoice 36209200 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,019.86 Refer 102202 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC. 10/22/2002 Cash Payment invoice Cash Payment Invoice Cash Payment Invoice Cash Payment Invoice Cash Payment Invoice Cash Payment invoice Cash Payment Invoice Transaction Date E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10/8/2002 09-02 #1307149 $184.10 09-02 #8003972 $20.39 09-02 #8003980 $17.76 09-02 #1707032 $67.01 09-02 #1307131 $31.66 09-02 #1307131 $31.66 09-02 #1307131 $31.67 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $384.25 Refer 102202 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTRO0 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) LOCKED UNIT $20.00 Invoice W173375 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $20.00 Refer 102202 BLACKOWIAK AND SON ROLLOFF 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 08-02 ROLL OFF $283.20 Invoice 10137349 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $283.20 Refer 102202 BROWN, JIM CULTURED SOD FAR 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials SOD $107.83 Invoice 7754 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Marquette Bank Meu 10100 Total $107.83 Refer 102202 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNT 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41920-210 Operating Supplies ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS $236.64 Invoice 29966 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $236.64 Refer 102202 CARDIAC SCIENCE 10/22/2002 Cash Payment G 222-22801 Deposits/Escrow MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $2,427.18 Invoice 060338 PO 17345 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,427.18 Refer 102202 CHADWICK AND MERTZ 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 09-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $6,063,00 Invoice 010202 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,063.00 Refer 102202 CHAMPION AUTO 10/22/2002 -4682- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 3 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies SEA FOAM, LENS, ETC $56.92 Invoice D163494 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials CLAMP $3.17 Invoice D165285 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials CLAMP $3.17 Invoice D165285 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials CLAMP $3.18 Invoice D165285 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SEA FOAM, LENS, ETC $21.88 Invoice D166195 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $88.32 Refer 102202 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $159.88 Invoice 61384190 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $159.88 Refer 102202 CONCO, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal Invoice 102202 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest Invoice 102202 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 10/22/2002 11-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE 11-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $518.48 $443.36 Total $961.84 Refer 102202 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply PADDLES $53.25 Invoice 20402 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $53.25 Refer 102202 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 09-02 COPIER MAINTENANCE $340.80 Invoice 27904 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $340.80 Cash Payment E 10143100-224 Street Maint Materials ELM RD/GRANDVlEW BLVD $9,795.00 Invoice 092702 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $9,795.00 Re;';r 10~20~ DAY61sTRIBUTINGCoMPANy 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIS $52.20 Invoice 195201 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $647.75 Invoice 195200 Cash Payment E 609~9750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $16.90 Invoice 19~43 Cash Payment E 609~9750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $715.65 Invoice 194435 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,432.50 ~ef~; i0~02 DISP~YsALES 10/22i2002 G 101-22812 X-Mas Ornaments WREATH $860.47 Invoice INV0007105 -4683- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 4 Current Period: October 2002 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $860.47 Refer 102202 E-Z RECYCLING 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-02 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $7,700.00 Invoice 4316 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,700.00 Refer 102202 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 309778 Cash Payment BEER Invoice 309779 Cash Payment BEER Invoice 307801 Cash Payment BEER Invoice 306460 Cash Payment BEER Invoice 306459 Cash Payment BEER Invoice 304909 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou Refer 102202 EQUIPMENT SUPPL Y, INCORPOR 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies SERVICE CALL Invoice 183430 Cash Payment Invoice 183430 Cash Payment Invoice 183430 Cash Payment Invoice S344100302 Transaction Date E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10100 E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies SERVICE CALL E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies SERVICE CALL E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-01-02 THRU 01-31-03 MAINTENANCE 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,562.30 $19.60 $48.00 $14.70 $2,661.05 $78.OO Total $5,383.65 $247.76 $247.76 $247.75 $192.00 $935.27 Refer 102202 FIRESIDE CORNER 10/22/2002 Cash Payment R 101-32239 Mechanical Registration REFUND FIREPLACE PERMIT $99.25 Invoice 090402 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $99.25 Refer 102202 FIRST STATE TIRE RECYCLING 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services TIRE RECYCLING CLEANUP DAY $296.00 Invoice 30629 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $296.00 Refer 102202 G & K SERVICES 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-01-02 UNIFORMS $39.20 Invoice 349537 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-01-02 UNIFORMS $39.20 Invoice 349537 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-01-02 UNIFORMS $39.19 Invoice 349537 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 10-01-02 MATS $16.70 Invoice 349537 -4684- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 10-01-02 MATS $16.70 Invoice 349537 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 10-01-02 MATS $16.70 Invoice 349537 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 09-17-02 MATS $51.47 Invoice 335560 Cash Payment 10-15-02 MATS $46.29 Invoice 363421 Cash Payment 09-24-02 UNIFORMS $31.01 Invoice 342544 Cash Payment 09-24-02 UNIFORMS $31.01 Invoice 342544 Cash Payment 09-24-02 UNIFORMS $31,00 Invoice 342544 Cash Payment 09-24-02 MATS $17.59 Invoice 342544 Cash Payment 09-24-02 MATS $17.59 Invoice 342544 Cash Payment 09-24-02 MATS $17.59 Invoice 342544 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 10-15-02 MATS $54.18 Invoice 363418 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-08-02 UNIFORMS $31.76 Invoice 356415 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-08-02 UNIFORMS $31.76 Invoice 356415 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-08-02 UNIFORMS $31.76 Invoice 356415 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 10-08-02 MATS $29.39 Invoice 356415 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 10-08-02 MATS $29.39 Invoice 356415 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 10-08-02 MATS $29.39 Invoice 356415 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $648.87 Refer 102202 GARY'S DIESEL SErVicE ' 10i22i20~ Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply AIR CLEANERS $206,58 Invoice 56042 Transaction Date 10/14/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $206.58 ~ei~; i~22D2 GL~/~i~I~LEW~O~ i0/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 09-02 WATER #5158500 $27.45 E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 09-20-02 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies 09-02 WATER #5158500 $27.45 Invoice 09-20-02 Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 09-02 WATER #5158501 $50.40 Invoice 09-20-02 tCash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 09-02 WATER #5158502 $7.00 Invoice 09-20-02 -4685- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 6 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 09-20-02 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 09-20-02 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 09-20-02 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 09-02 WATER #5158502 $7.00 09-02 WATER #5158502 $47.00 09-02 WATER #32345800 $51.76 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $218.06 Refer 102202 GRAND, DEB Cash Payment E 609-49750-331 Use of personal auto Invoice 101702 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 10/22/2002 REIMBURSE MILEAGE $138.11 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $138.11 Refer 102202 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,488.08 invoice 610569 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,446.73 Invoice 610568 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $333.80 invoice 610415 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $79.85 Invoice 607090 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale LIQUOR $1,616.73 invoice 607089 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,965.19 Refer 102202 HARRELL, LEONARD 10/22/2002. Cash Payment G 101-21720 Short Term Disability REFUND PREMIUM $164.50 Invoice 101702 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $164.50 Refer 102202 HATCH, JIM SALES COMPAY 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply CONNECTOR invoice 3951 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 $30,89 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $30.89 Refer 102202 HA WKINS, INCORPORA TED 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 7 CONTAINERS invoice DM80185 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $35.00 Total $35.00 Refer 102202 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials HOSE WITH ENDS Invoice 41898 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $0.00 Total $0.00 Refer 102202 HENDERSON, MARK 10/22/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22834 3207 Roxbury, Henderson 3207 ROXBURY HENDERSON $800.00 Invoice 101-22834 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $800.00 Refer 102202 HENNEPIN COUNTYINFORMATIO 10/22/2002. Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 09-02 NETWORK SUPPORT $36.66 Invoice 22097035 -4686- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 7 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $36.66 Refer 102202 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CE 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies EMT PUBLICATION $54.00 Invoice 10466 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $54.00 Refer 102202 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 09-02 BOOKING FEE $557.40 Invoice 100802 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $557.40 Refer 102202 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 08-02 ROOM AND BOARD $1,691.25 Invoice 000701 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,691.25 Refer 102202 HENTGES, MATTHEW 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ADDITIONAL ADVANCE 04-07-02 $1.50 Invoice 041102 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1.50 Refer 102202 HENTGES, S.M. AND SONS, INCO 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST $5,054.33 Invoice 101502 Transaction Date 10/16/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,054.33 Refer 102202 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I 10/22/2002. Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs LOST LAKE GREENWAY CD'S $4,639.87 Invoice 100802-A Cash Payment G 101-22857 Three Points, Becker Propert 09-02 BECKER REZONING $75.00 Invoice 100802-B1 Cash Payment G 101-22869 Landgon Woods, 00-35 09~02 LANGDON WOODS $150.00 Invoice 100802-B2 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE $75.00 Invoice 100802-B3 Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 09-02 ROTTLUND DEVELOPMENT $225.00 Invoice 100802-B4 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 MISC PLANNING $1,274.08 Invoice 100802-B5 Cash Payment E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 VARIANCES $150.00 Invoice 100802-C Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 COUNTY RD 15 RELOCATION $840.04 Invoice 100802-D Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 TIF RELATED WORK $363.25 Invoice 100802-E Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,792.24 Refer 102202 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 11-02 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL SPACE $5,452.00 Invoice 102202 ~n Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5 452.00 Ref;r 102202 i$~ P~-,~ ~E£L~ -4687- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 8 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment $376.81 invoice 11434 Cash Payment $331.15 Invoice 11510 Cash Payment $79.45 Invoice 11529 Cash Payment $43.86 Invoice 11539 Cash Payment $25.86 Invoice 11548 Cash Payment $409.56 Invoice 11234 Cash Payment $197.52 Invoice 11241 Cash Payment $69.86 Invoice 11254 Cash Payment $25.86 Invoice 11265 Cash Payment $141.42 Invoice 11272 Cash Payment $133.65 invoice 11378 Cash Payment $416.59 Invoice 11623 Cash Payment $70.13 Invoice 11457 Cash Payment $167.05 Invoice 11463 Cash Payment $91.48 Invoice 11479 Cash Payment -$103.58 Invoice Cash Payment -$876.07 Invoice 11234 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,600.60 Refer 102202 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL, INC 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services RECYCLED AIR CONDITIONERS $2,730.00 Invoice 33463 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,730.00 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SHROUD,FAN ASSEMBLY E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TEST/REPLACE BATTERY E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery FLUSH POWER STEERING E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 4-WHEEL ROTATION E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery R&R WATER PUMP E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR BRAKE LIGHTS E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MOUNT/BALANCE TIRES E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery POLY COG BELT E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TOGGLE SW TO BYPASS E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery LOWER-ONE SIDE E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR WIRING TO ALT E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERIES E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ONBOARD CHARGE E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CREDIT-OVER PAYMENT E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair CREDIT-OVER PAYMENT Refer 102202 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies TRASH CANS $2.13 Invoice 607936 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,13 Refer 102202 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,075.70 Invoice 1467839 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $375.70 Invoice 1467838 -4688- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/022:24 PM Page 9 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 609~9750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,586.73 Invoice 1467836 Cash Payment E 609~9750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $148.95 Invoice 1467835 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,187.08 Refer 102202 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 455~6381-600 Debt S~ Principal 11-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $273.07 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment E 455-46381~11 Bond Interest 11-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $396.04 Invoice 102202 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 MarqueEe Bank Mou 10100 Total Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 092802 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 MarqueEe Bank Mou 10100 Total ~ ..... ........ $150.00 Refer 102202 JUBILEE FOODS 1~;~0~ ................ ~ Cash Payment E 670~9500-460 Janitorial Se~ices 09-28-02 CLEANUP DAY $37.28 Invoice 092802 Cash Payment E 670-49500~60 Janitorial Se~ices 09-28-02 CLEANUP DAY $23.25 Invoice 092802 Cash Payment E 670-49500~60 Janitorial Se~ices 09-28-02 CLEANUP DAY $37.15 Invoice 092802 Cash Payment E 101-41110~30 Miscellaneous 09-11-02 REMEMBERANCE $66.88 Invoice 091102 Cash Payment G 222-22801 Deposits/Escrow 06-01-02 FISH FRY EVENT $318.48 Invoice 060102-B Cash Payment E 101-41110~30 Miscellaneous 10-10-02 COUNCIL COOKIES $15.18 Invoice 092802 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $498.22 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair TOOTH KIT, POINT $88.46 Invoice 77331 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total Refer 102202 ~WSON PRODUCTS, INC 10/22/2002 $88.46 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials PENTRATING OIL $62.40 Invoice 0155546 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials PENTRATING OIL $62.40 Invoice 0155546 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials PENTRATING OIL $62.40 Invoice 0155546 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $543.82 Invoice 0135383-1N Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $731.02 R;i;r 10~202 LEAGUE O~ MINNESOTA CIITES 10/22/2002 Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic STORM WATER POLLUTION PLAN $5,000.00 Invoice 1-0000116600 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Tota $5 000 00 -4689- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 10 Current Period: October 2002 Refer 102202 MADDEN, FRANKANDASSOClAT 1012212002 Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $65.20 Invoice 100202 Transaction Date 10/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $65.20 Refer 102202 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 468437 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 465989 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 463509 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 463508 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou $1,375.65 $1,346.95 $97.50 $2,685.95 10100 Total $5,506.05 Refer 102202 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-16-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $20.80 Invoice 11549 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-19-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $67.70 Invoice 11573 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-19-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $25.60 Invoice 11586 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-27-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $178,40 Invoice 11601 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-30-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $16,80 Invoice 1613 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $309.30 Refer 102202 MARTIN, STEVEN C. AND BETTY J 10/22/2002 Cash Payment R 101-34114 Planning Commission Approv REFUND VARIANCE APPLICATION $200.00 Invoice 102202 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 102202 MCCOMBSFRANKROOSASSOCI 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41550-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-05-02 LEGAL $262.68 Invoice 378 Cash Payment E 101-41550-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-05-02 LEGAL $47,76 Invoice 377 Cash Payment E 101-41550-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-50-02 LEGAL $33.83 Invoice 376 Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs 10-05-02 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $51.74 Invoice 374 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $396.01 Refer 102202 MES - SNYDER, INCORPORATED 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms BOOT FIREBREAK $139.32 Invoice 090392 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $139.32 Refer 102202 METRO FIRE 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies CLEANER $66.72 Invoice 11288 -4690- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 11 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies SCBA BOTTLES $225,00 Invoice 11390 Cash Payment LEATHER FRONT $70.85 Invoice 11260 Cash Payment HELMET $609,63 Invoice 11247 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $972.20 Refer 102202 METRO WEST INSPECTIONS 10/11/2002 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 BUILDING INSPECTINOS $3,207.60 Invoice 101002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 FIRE INSPECTIONS $896.00 Invoice 101002 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,103.60 Refer 102202 MID-MINNESOTA WIRE 10/22/2002. Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies HOSE WINDER $390.00 Invoice 14994 Transaction Date 10/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $390.00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 09-02 PAGERS $90.66 Invoice 20233310026 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $90.66 Refer 102202 MINNESOTA COUNTYATTORNEY 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies PUBLICATIONS $260.39 Invoice 9069 PO 17443 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $260.39 Refer 102202 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUN~i i~ i~i~/2002 Cash Payment E 101.45200-221 Equipment Parts SPIRAL SLIDE $371.53 Invoice 680564 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $371.53 Refer 102202 MORRELL AND MORRELL, INCOR 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500.460 Janitorial Services RECYCLE DAY $2,232.79 Invoice Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,232.79 ~fer 'i~)2 'M~D Fi~E ~A~ ~-~I-E~ Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 09-02 MONTHLY SALARIES $5,291.00 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 222.42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 09-02 DRILLS $640.00 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 09-02 MAINTENANCE $1,250.00 Invoice 093002 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,181.00 ~efer 1~2202 MUELLER, wILLiAM AND SONs 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-05-02 BLACKTOP $2,559.79 Invoice 68825 ~h Payment E 101.43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-10-02 BLACKTOP $51.66 Invoice 68994 -4691 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 12 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials invoice 69443 Cash Payment Invoice 69788 Cash Payment Invoice 70036 Cash Payment Invoice 70163 Cash Payment Invoice 70383 Cash Payment Invoice 70848 Transaction Date E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 10/11/2002 09-13-02 BLACKTOP $411.52 09-18-02 BLACKTOP $778.84 09-20-02 BLACKTOP $173.78 09-23-02 BLACKTOP $69.42 09-25-02 BLACKTOP $255.86 09-30-02 BLACKTOP $86.20 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,387.07 Refer 102202 Cash Payment Invoice 041402 Cash Payment Invoice 040702 Transaction Date MYERS, TONY 10/22/2002. E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ADDITIONAL ADVANCE 04-12-02 DULUTH FIRE SCHOOL E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 10/11/2002 ADDITIONAL ADVANCE 04-07-02 $6.45 $68.95 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $75.40 Refer 102202 NAGELL APPRAISAL AND CONSUL 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 6155 EVERGREEN WELL PROJECT $500.00 Invoice 10395 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $500.00 Refer 102202 NASH SALES, INCORPORATED 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 09-28-02 CITY CLEANUP $100.00 Invoice 1653 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 102202 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO 1012212002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 09-02 LOCATES $126.33 Invoice 2090538 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 09-02 LOCATES $126.32 Invoice 2090538 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $252.65 Refer 102202 PALM, TIM 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ADDITIONAL ADVANCE 04-05-02 $49.81 ROCHESTER FIRE SCHOOL Invoice 040702 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $49.81 Refer 102202 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $328,00 Invoice 0200019-1N Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $328.00 Refer 102202 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 36973128 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $70.60 $70.60 -4692- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 13 Refer 102202 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC 10/22/2002. Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,822.40 Invoice 881100 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,822.40 Refer 102202 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARE'FI'ES $165.75 Invoice 2148 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $810.29 Invoice 2107 Cash Payment E 609-49750~255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $787.45 Invoice 1650 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,763.49 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ADDITIONAL ADVANCE 04-16-02 DULUTH $49.54 FIRE SCHOOL Invoice 041602 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Bank Mou 10100 Total ,~4~54Marquette Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$2,688.60 Invoice 154747-00-A Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,002.31 Invoice 177637-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $69.85 Invoice 177554-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,380.13 Invoice 177528-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $28.34 Invoice 177468-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,382.09 Invoice 177380-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$7.31 Invoice 176174-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa CREDIT--LIQUQR -$36.48 Invoice 172253-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,639.92 Invoice 174621-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $85.70 Invoice 174612-00 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,855.95 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 08-20-02 THRU 09-19-02 #543-000-053-000 $24.23 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment Invoice 102202 Invoice 102202 E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 5801 BARTLETT BLVD 08-20-02 THRU 09-19-02 #543-001-095-800 4812 CUMBERLAND RD 08-20-02 THRU 09-19-02 #543-833-500 2336 WILSHIRE BLVD $53.18 $15.98 -4693- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 14 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 08-20-02 THRU 09-19-02 #543-001-852-100 $43.27 2415 WILSHIRE BLVD Invoice 102202 Cash Payment Invoice 102202 Cash Payment Invoice 102202 Cash Payment Invoice 102202 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas UUlities 08-20-02 THRU 09-19-02 #543-001-853-000 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD $46.63 E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 08-20-02 THRU 09-19-02 #543-001-972-603 STREETS $20.26 E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 08-20-02 THRU 09-19-02 #543-001-972-603 WATER $11.51 E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 08-20-02 TH RU 09-19-02 #543-001-972-603 $14.28 SEWER Invoice 102202 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $229.34 Refer 102202 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AIR AND OXYGEN $21,73 Invoice R09021058 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $21.73 Refer 102202 ROGERS, DAN 10/22/2002 Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND WATER/SEWER $113.69 Invoice 100802 Transaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $113.69 Refer 102202 ROGERS, RICHARD 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE MILEAGE $121.44 Invoice 041902 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $121.44 Refer 102202 SCHARBERAND SONS 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair FILTER ELE $43.76 Invoice 02 2029357 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair FILTER ELE $104.58 Invoice 02 2029279 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $148.34 Refer 102202 SERVICE MASTER CLEAN 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services CAN LINERS Invoice 12759 Transaction Date 10/1112002 Refer 102202 SHORELINE PHOTO Cash Payment Invoice 45449 Transaction Date E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10/22/2002 PHOTO PROCESSING $32.35 10100 Total $32.35 $11.51 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $11.51 Refer 102202 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment Invoice 64158 Cash Payment Invoice 64146 E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies 10/22/2002 PERMIT FORMS BUSINSS CARDS $246.55 $55.65 -4694- CiTY OF MOUND Payments 10117102 2:24. PNI Page 15 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies BUSINSS CARDS $45.53 Invoice 64143 Cash Payment E 222-42260-350 Pdnting PROPOSALS FOR ORONO $6.39 Invoice 64147 Cash Payment E 609-49750-350 Printing KEG TAGS W/CHANGES $243.14 Invoice 64137 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $597.26 Refer 102202 SPORTING BREED KENNELS 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees 11-02 DOG KENNEL FEE $325.00 Invoice 102202 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $325.00 Refer 102202 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply MOTOR STARTER $265.84 Invoice 7133 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $265.84 Refer 102202 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery P-METRIC NS OWL $71.53 Invoice 10005947 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $71.53 Refer 102202 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $502.40 Invoice 276494 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,835.20 Invoice 276493 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $12.85 Invoice 276492 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,097.55 Invoice 275769 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $50.85 invoice 275768 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $234.00 Invoice 235491 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,732.85 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies PHOTO PROCESSING $17.40 Invoice 601960 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FILM $10.63 Invoice 601960 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Bank Mou 10100 Total 03Marquette Refer 102202 TIMBERWALLLANDSCAPING i0/2~200~ Cash Payment E 101-43100-232 Landscape Material TIMBERS $190.80 Invoice 0135383-1N PO 17456 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material TIMBERS $381.65 Invoice 0135383-1N PO 17456 ITransaction Date 10/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $572.45 -4695- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 16 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply REWOUD STATOR, ETC $2,272.61 invoice 21592 Transaction Date 10/14/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,272.61 Refer 102202 TRIMARK PHYSICIANS GROUP 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-300 Professional Srvs ~421335554 PHYSICAL MILLER, JOHN $43.00 Invoice 102202 Transaction Date 10/10/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $43.00 Refer 102202 TRUE VALUE, NA VAARRE 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials BATTERIES $47.55 invoice 108349 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials BALL VALVE $31.94 invoice 108799 Transaction Date 10/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $79.49 Refer 102202 TUSHIEMONTGOMERYARCHITE Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings Invoice 14 Transaction Date 10/11/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 102202 TI/VIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies invoice 358780-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 360356-1 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies invoice 359622-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 359622-0 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies Invoice 359650-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358187-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358913-0 10/22/2002 09-02 MOUND LIQUOR STORE 10/22/2002 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES HIGHLIGHTERS TONER CARTRIDGE TONER CARTRIDGE MOUSE CREDIT-JACKET FILE MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $12,052.70 Total $12,052.70 $6.55 $6.55 $6.55 $6.55 $6.55 $2.18 $2.18 $3.27 $3.26 $24.5o $95.o9 $21o.85 $21.75 -$43.64 $2,28 -4696- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.28 Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $10.67 Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.28 Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.76 Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.76 Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1,14 Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.12 Invoice 358913-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies TONER CARTRIDGE $98.90 invoice 360356 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies TONER CARTRIDGE $98.89 Invoice 360356 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $210.77 Invoice 35990-0 PO 17380 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $78.79 Invoice 36009-0 PO 17380 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.28 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $863.11 Refer 102202 UNIFORMS LIMITED ~ 10/22/2002 Cash Payment G 101-20200Accounts Payable SWEATER, ETC $127.15 Invoice 141202 Transaction Date 10/17/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $127.15 Refer 102202 USFiL~F~R 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials CURB BOX AND ROD $254.26 Invoice 8782430 PO 17483 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply METER TRANSCEIVER UNIT $3,993.75 Invoice 8793155 Transaction Date 10/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,248.01 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials OIL FILTERS $503.06 Invoice 329365 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials OIL FILTERS $76.06 Invoice 329366 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials BULB $10.63 Invoice 329483 Transaction Date 10/14/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $589 75 10/22/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 09-02 #0542-505-000-274 $4,956.44 Invoice 0542-505-000-27 Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 09-02 #2245-301-939 $1,194.16 Invoice 102202 -4697- CITY OF MOUND Payments 10/17/02 2:24 PM Page 18 Current Period: October 2002 Cash Payment 09-02 #0466-607-223 $21.99 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 #1914-601-425 $596.48 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 #0217-606-329 $3,059.61 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 ~2184-407-147 $459.72 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 ~0047-005-229 $214.13 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 #0864-508-832 $173.00 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 #0864-508-832 $173.00 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 ff0864-508-832 $173.00 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 ~:)018-802-634 $2,141.25 Invoice 102202 Cash Payment 09-02 #0009-604-835 $696.72 Invoice 102202 Transaction Date 10/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $13,859.50 FUnd Summary E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities E 609-49750-381 Electdc Utilities E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities E 222-42260-381 Electdc Utilities E 101-45200-381 Electdc Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 10100 Ma~uet~ Bank Mound $46,707.26 $12,769.25 $21.75 $25,485.47 $2,834.24 $37,043.47 $3,280.73 $58,560.68 $13,156.47 $5,075.00 $204,934.32 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $204,934.32 $204,934.32 -4698- Page No, of Pages , rap sal WIDMER INC. P.O. Box 219 ST. BONIFACIUS, MINNESOTA 55375 (612) 446-1.495 FAX (612) 446-1836 PROPOSAL SUelvh i 1 ~;LJ TO STREET 5341 Ma?~ood CITY, STATE and ZIP CODE Mound: MN 55364 ARCHITECT IDATE OF PLANS PHONE 952-472-1251 JOB NAME 02-03 Snowplowing JOB LOCATION DATE IJOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: * n .................. S. ow......r, emo.v..al....at......the......attached.....ra.te.s.,.,..f( We will not be responsible for any underground utilities that cannot be located by the utility companies or the homeowner. Normal clean-up is included in this proposal. There is no sod figured in the proposal. We will not assume the responsibility for water pipes, trees, tree roots, sprinkler systems, etc. unless notified to exact location prior to excavating. Frost ripping extra charge. It is expressly stipulated and agreed that the undersigned shall not be held liable for damages to grass, trees, shrubs and any underground obstructions, including pipes, elec- trical wiring and etc. In bidding job we figure soil to be dry. If wet, theft will be extra charges based on time and material. See reverse side for lien notice and additional terms. ~e ~ropo~e hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: Payment to be made as follows: dollars ($ ). A finance charge of 1~t% per month (18% annual rate) will be charl~ed on past due accounts. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. Ail work to be completed in a workmanlike ~ manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications Authorized involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra Signature . charge over and above the estimate. Ail agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents ~ ' or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Note: This proposal may. be Our workers are fully covered by Workman's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted w~thin days. Acceptance r p sal - The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date Signature Signature -4699- 4250 Creekview Circle RO. Box 219 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 (952) 446-1495 Fax (952) 446-1836 Sep-02 2002- 2003 SNOWPLOWING RATES Equipment 980 Cat 966 Cat Wheel Loader (5 Yd) 380 Komatsu Loader (4 Yd) 300 Komatsu (3 Yd) Trucks w/plow & spin sander 4x4 Pickup 1845 Skid Loaders w/wo broom Tandem Dumps (for hauling) Tri-axle Quad Per Hour $130.00 $104.00 $ 93.00 $ 93.00 $ 68.00 $ 62.00 $ 73.00 $ 62.00 $ 65.00 $ 67.00 Safety · Quality · Productivity An Equal Opportunity Employer -4700- Engineering · Planning "Surveying October 16, 2002 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2002 Storm Sewer Improvements Partial Payment MFRA #13677 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc.'s_ Payment Request No. 1 for work completed through October 15, 2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $154,923,51. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:pry cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director, City of Mound Greg Skinner, Public Works Superintendent, City of Mound Enclosure sAmain:XMou 13677:\Correspondence~hansonl 0-16 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota -4701 - · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-maiL' mfra@mfra, com m m Z -'.1 t"" t-- "n -< .o ~>~o --I..n 0 -4702- ~' --~ .... ~ ooooooooooooom~oooo ~ 9999~999999999~0999 m ooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooo o ooooooooooooooooooo o 999999~9999999~999999 Z O00000000O=O~O000OO~ ~ =0 ~ 0~ 0 000000000000~000000 ~ 00000000000~0~00000 ~ b .... ~'~''~ ...................... -4703- 888888888 88888888888888888 8 888888888o o 88888888888888888 ooooooooo oooo~ooo~o .... ~oo~ o o m 8 8 888888888 8 88888888888888888 8 888888888 8 88888888888888888 o00000000 00000000~0~00~ 8 888888888 8 88888888888888888 ~D 0 0 "IJ © m m -< -i "n mrD -4704- 88888 8888 88888 88888 8 8888 8 88888 88888 8 8888 8 88888 99999 0000 00000 88888 8 8888 8 88888 88888 8 8888 8 88888 m 8 m -n m m -4705- Engineering · Planning ° Surveying October 15, 2002 Ms. Kandis Hanson City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound West Edge Boulevard Watermain Improvements Final Payment Request MFRA//07953 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is S. M. Hentges Final Payment Request for the subject project. The amount of this request is $5,054.33. We have reviewed the project and find that the work was completed in general accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation that the Contractor be paid in full for this project. Very truly yours, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Mound Finance Director Greg Skinner, Mound Public Works Superintendent Enclosure s:~nain:Xraou07953:Xspecs~nalpay 1 O- 15 -4706- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com C ~ ~ -4707- ~ ~ ~ ~.~-'~* . ~ ~o o m Z I"1'I -4708- 999 888 ~ ' 0 Ill "11 0 Z .-I .-n m r~ ITl -4709- SECTION 00030 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CITY OF MOUND POST OFFICE DEMOLITION SAP 145-108-05 Sealed proposals will be received by the City Clerk until 11:00 A.M. Wednesday, November 6, 2002 at the City Offices, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud, for hhe furnishing of all labor, equipmem and materials to complete the: demolition of the existing Post Office Building. The bids will be considered by the City Council at their meeting on Tuesday, November 12, 2002. All proposals shall be addressed to: Bonnie Ritter City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 and shall be securely sealed and shall be endorsed on the outside with the statement "Post Office Demolition" and shall be on the Bid Form included in the specifications for the project. Copies of the plans and specifications and other proposed contract documents are on file with the City Clerk and at the office of McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., 15050 23~ Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447. Plans and specifications for use in preparing bids may be obtained at the offices of the Engineer upon payment of $30.00 per set (includes MN sales tax), which !~ NON- REFUNDABLE. Individual sheets of the plans and sections of the specifications may'l:i[ purchased at the rate of four do~ars ($4.00) per sheet (includes MN sales tax) of plans and twenty-five cents ($0.25) per page (includes MN sales tax) of specifications, which is NON-REFUNDABLE. Each bidder shall file with his bid a cashier's check, certified check, or bid bond in an amount of not less than five (5) percent of the total amount of the bid. No bid may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after the bids are opened. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive any informalities or irregularities therein. END OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS -4710- MFRA #12379 CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has adopted business subsidy criteria according to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993-116J.995 (the "Act"). A public hearing on the adoption of an amendment to such criteria will be held as follows: WHEN' Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:30 p.m. - City Council meeting. WHERE: Mound City Hall Council Chambers 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 HOW TO COMMENT: Attend the hearing and you will be heard, or submit written comments. Copies of the proposed business subsidy criteria amendment will be available for public inspection on and after the date of this notice at Mound City Hall during normal business hours. Bonnie Ritter City Clerk Published in The Laker November 2, 2002. -4711- CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall to hear, consider, and pass on all written and oral objections, if any, to the proposed assessments on the following parcels of land for: 2002 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE: PID Number Amount 13-117-24-33-0083 14-117-24-44-0001 14-117-24-44-0004 13-117-24-33-0004 13~117-24-33-0005 13-117-24-33-0076 13-117-24-33-0014 13-117-24-33-0150 13-117-24-33-0073 14-117-24-44-0036 14-117-24-44-0037 14-117-24-44-0038 14-117-24-44-0039 14-117-24-44-0042 57.46 76.75 182.82 48.11 199.42 70.38 37.96 284.55 411.39 150.11 64.52 29.63 114.11 77.74 An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within 10 days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. These assessments may be paid in full at the City prior to certification to the County Auditor. Bonnie Ritter City Clerk -4712- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2002 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST LEVY # WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: NOW, 1. 2002 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE FROM JULY 1,2001 TO JUNE 30, 2002. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in one annual installment as follows: o o LEVY # IMPROVEMENT 2002 CBD Parking Maintenance INT. RATE YEARS 6% 1 (SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR PID NUMBERS AND AMOUNTS) Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days (November 22, 2002) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll. Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall. Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section 370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00 increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be accepted. If the assessment is not paid on or before November 22, 2002, the amount will be spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2002, and all of 2003). Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3. -4713- Resolution No. 02- 6. The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period is six percent (6%). The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of October, 2002 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -4714- CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS: UNPAID WATER AND SEWER BILLS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota will meet in the City Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 P.M. on October 22 2002, to hear, consider and pass on all written and oral objections, if any, to the proposed assessments on the following parcels of land for: UNPAID WATER AND SEWER BILLS: AMOUNT TO BE SPREAD OVER 1 YEAR PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION # AMOUNT 13-117-24-24-0014 716.68 12-117-24-43-0004 549.16 12-117-24-43-0019 355.20 12-117-24-43 0053 13-117-24-13 0049 13-117-24-12-0189 13-117-24-13-0009 13-117-24-13-0040 12-117-24-43-0001 13-117-24-12-0009 13-117-24-12-0014 13-117-24-12-0006 13-117-24-12-0231 13-117-24-11-0057 13-117-24-11-0056 13-117-24-14-0029 13-117-24-14-0030 13-117-24-12-0097 13-117-24-12-0113 13-117-24-12-0096 18-117-23-23-0062 18-117-23-23-0004 18-117-23-23-0065 18-117-23-23~0059 18-117-23-23-0034 18-117-23-23-0073 14-117-24-14-0032 14-117-24-13-0004 428.63 432.33 285.12 249.72 987.46 706.26 605.71 405.52 4O5.77 599.29 429.47 241.13 594.59 1146.78 380.44 264.80 246.65 352.22 649.34 366.31 914.90 681.85 307.3O 251.37 428.46 -4715- 14-117-24-42-0109 14-117-24-42-0110 14-117-24-41-0038 14-117-24-42-0077 14-117-24-42-0125 14-117-24-42-0095 14-117-24-42-0016 14-117-24-42-0028 14-117-24-42-0030 14-117-24-42-0042 14-117-24-42-0041 14-117-24-43-0029 14-117-24-43-0034 14-117-24-31-0020 14-117-24-32-0032 14-117-24-34-0015 14-117-24-34-0049 14-117-24-44-0032 14-117-24-44-0031 14-117-24-44-0029 14-117-24-42-0023 14-117-24-43-0002 14-117-24-42 0034 14-117-24-43-0004 14-117-24-34 0005 14-117-24-32-0061 13-117-24-32-0039 13-117-24-32-0040 13-117-24-32-0170 13-117-24-31-0077 13-117-24-34-0004 13-117-24-31-0011 13-117-24-32-0106 13-117-24-32-0107 13-117-24-32-0115 13-117-24-31-0043 13-117-24-31-0068 13-117-24-34-0014 13-117-24-34-0010 13-117-24-43-0072 13-117-24-43-0063 13-117-24-43-0081 13-117-24-43-0086 13-117-24-43-0089 24-117-24-12-0057 13-117-24-43 0090 24-117-24-12-0053 305.86 986.37 457.11 636.16 234.20 499.41 1355.33 661.71 368.91 1197.13 553.47 499.35 796.44 2079.29 357.38 598.14 1262.16 525.71 683.07 234.20 719.63 232.08 451.33 305.82 582.27 586.65 424.71 384.03 436.80 613.85 556.56 740.63 417.91 576.92 441.88 235.30 448.67 313.33 491.00 533.56 398.82 469.01 601.87 482.71 239.42 472.68 257.28 -4716- 13-117-24-41-0048 13-117-24-41-0059 13-117-24-41-0042 13-117-24-41-0055 13-117-24-41-0057 13-117-24-41-0012 13-117-24-43-0122 13~117-24-41-0022 13-117-24-43-0118 13-117-24-42-0017 13-117-24-42-0022 13-117-24-41-0065 13-117-24-44-0095 13-117-24-44-0034 24-117-24-12-0030 24-117-24-21-0010 23-117-24-14-0013 23-117-24-13-0012 23-117-24-42-0005 23-117-24-32-0014 22-117-24-44-0030 22-117-24-43-0044 23-117-24-41-0018 23-117-24-44-0008 23-117-24-42-0054 23-117-24-42-0104 23-117-24-42-0088 23-117-24-42-0083 23-117-24-42-0111 23-117-24-42-0028 23-117-24-42-0020 23-117-24-42-0045 23-117-24-31-0012 23-117-24-43-0008 23-117-24-31-0037 23-117-24-31-0041 23-117-24-24-0013 23-117-24-24-0008 23-117-24-31-0054 23-117-24-34-0066 23-117-24-32-0025 23-117-24-33-0027 22-117-24-44-0005 23-117-24-23-0095 23-117-24-23-0034 23-117-24-23-0054 23-117-24-32-0043 767.86 229.75 573.16 467.53 376.48 443.50 656.82 918.62 543.36 357.45 730.33 501.17 713.74 506.17 341.39 600.87 672.16 612.26 552.37 225.69 523.72 492.75 252.75 556.83 324.99 437.68 442.47 640.03 615.18 268.68 381.70 503.44 569.86 623.98 529.58 570.33 325.10 433.53 726.57 818.01 345.04 832.40 1038.09 1269.96 400.95 270.16 488.35 -4717- 22-1 23-1 23-1 23-1 23-1 23-1 23-1 23-1 23-1 14-1 14-1 13-1 24-1 24-1 13-1 13-1 13-1 13-1 13-1 24-1 24-1 24-1 13-1 24-1 19-1 19'1 19-1 24-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 24-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 19-1 24-1 19-1 19-1 17-24-43-0007 17-24-32-0064 17-24-32-0063 17-24-23-0109 17-24-23-0104 17-24-24-0058 17-24-24-0056 17-24-24-0037 17-24-13-0046 17-24-14-0004 17-24-41-0001 17-24-32-0140 17-24-22-0001 17-24-21-0005 17-24-34-0098 17-24-43-0020 17-24-43-0025 17-24-44-0021 17-24-44-0059 17-24-12-0068 17-24-13-0009 t 7-24-12-0020 17-24-43-0004 17-24-14-0073 17-23-23-0135 17-23-23-0082 17-23-23-0004 17-24-13-0027 17-23-24-0033 17-23-31-0030 17-23-23-0064 17-23-23-0108 17-23-24-0024 17-23-32-0033 17-23-32-0186 17-24-41-0176 17-23-31-0108 17-23-31-0079 17-23-32-0195 17-23-32-0204 17-23-31-0096 17-23-32-0076 17-23-32-0111 17-23-32-0110 17-24-41-0162 17-23-31-0128 17-23-31-0086 218.68 881.87 582.29 291.61 499.55 678.59 411.08 1107.05 830.49 2629.71 306.39 437.47 400.18 728.92 413.53 549.40 729.99 463.00 729.89 371.15 2012.78 640,81 235.13 339.68 478.13 661.77 620.03 430.85 603.37 321.60 1629.11 1627.85 561.27 448.09 1183.01 240.23 291.33 227.60 310.73 1668.27 469.93 607.65 384.35 300.75 456.35 674.97 305.91 -4718- 19-117-23-34-0024 19-117-23-34-01 O0 19-117-23-34-0063 19-117-23-34-0064 19-117-23-33-0172 25-117-24-11-0133 24-117-24-44-0051 24-117-24-43-0034 19-117-23-33-0196 19-117-23-32-0210 24-117-24-44-0022 19-117-23-34-0044 19-117-23-33-0235 19-117-23-33-0055 19-117-23-33-0129 19-117-23-33-0179 24-117-24-44-0078 24-117-24-44-0041 24-117-24-44-0043 24-117-24-44-0035 24-117-24-44-0177 24-117-24-44-0111 24-117-24-44-0182 24-117-24-44-0228 25-117-24-11-0025 24-117-24-41-0022 24-117-24-41-0110 24-117-24-41-0017 24-117-24-41-01 O0 24-117-24-41-0168 24-117-24-41-0067 24-117-24-41-0070 24-117-24-42-0007 24-117-24-42-0008 24-117-24-42-0025 24-117-24-41-0107 24-117-24-44-0171 24-117-24-43-0017 24-117-24-41-0175 25-117-24-21-0160 25-117-24-12-0233 25-117-24-12-0230 25-117-24-21-0035 30-117-23-22-0091 19-117-23-33-0033 30-117-23-22-0034 30-117-23-22-0036 328.58 402,3,5 312.09 512.99 330.77 1067.02 705.55 776.62 353.83 665.88 488.86 658.91 424.00 516.56 431.30 290.01 294.89 782.98 259.55 839.41 357.40 344.79 389.09 688.02 511.62 361.69 309.16 615.08 380.54 316.21 262.17 324.29 313.40 329.52 725.41 305.92 921.88 284.04 316.16 540.43 349.22 286.60 739.28 338.71 471.40 273.50 303.56 -4719- 30-117-23-22-0070 25-117-24-11-0070 30-117-23-21-0007 30-117-23-22-0049 25-117-24-11-0035 25-117-24-11-0054 24-117-24-34-0009 25-117-24-12-0134 25-117-24-21-0007 19-117-23-21-0043 19-117-23-23-0142 13-117-24-33-0038 13-117-24-33-0073 13-117-24-33-0047 13-117-24-33-0057 13-117-24-33-0014 13-117-24-44-0016 650.33 494.96 463.75 805.98 310.87 959.65 256.56 677.34 294.04 429.89 293.63 376.03 454.25 880.38 372.91 306.94 317.97 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.011 to 429.110, all property lying within the above described limits and benefiting therefrom is proposed to be assessed. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the hearing, but the Council may consider any objections to the amount of the proposed individual assessments at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. The City Council has adopted, pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 435.193 to 435.195, a resolution (#89-77) containing standards and guidelines for deferring the assessments for senior citizens for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments on homestead property. The standards and guidelines are on file with the City Clerk for your inspection. Bonnie Rittner City Clerk Published in The Laker October 5, 2002 -4720- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT WATER & SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST LEVY # WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER BILLS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: PID# IMPROVEMENT INT. AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY # SEE LIST DEL. SEWER & $ 1 6% WATER Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days (November 22, 2002) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll. Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall. Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section 370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00 increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be accepted. If the assessment is not paid on or before November 22, 2002 the amount will be spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2002, and all of 2003). Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3. -4721 - Resolution No. 02- o The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period is six percent (6%). The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following voted in the affirmative; The following voted in the negative; Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of October, 2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -4722- CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet on Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall to hear, consider and pass on all written and oral objections, if any, to the proposed assessment on the following land for hazardous tree removal: PID NO: 25-117-24-12-0195 AMOUNT: $2,012.85 An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within 10 days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. This assessment may be paid in full at the City before certification to the County Auditor. Bonnie Ritter City Clerk -4723- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST LEVY # WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: INT. PID # IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY# 25-117-24-12-0195 Hazardous Tree $2,012.85 1 6% Removal Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days (November 22, 2002) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll. Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall. Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section 370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00 increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be accepted. If the assessment is not paid on or before November 22, 2002 the amount will be spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2002, and all of 2003). Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3. -4724- Resolution No. 02- The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period is six percent (6%). o The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following voted in the affirmative; The following voted in the negative; Adopted by the City Council this 22® day of October, 2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -4725- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR WESTEDGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Westedge Boulevard from County Road 15 to Woodedge Road, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2003, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: -4726- The following voted in the negative: Resolution No. 02- Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of October, 2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -4727- AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA ) CITY OF MOUND ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, Bonnie Ritter, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: I am a United States citizen over 21 years of age, and the City Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota. On October 7, 2002, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States post office at Mound, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of a hearing on proposed special assessments, enclosed in envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the respective addresses shown: Corey S. & Mary Jo L. Huson 2246 Westedge Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Bart & Sandra Roeglin 2260 Westedge Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Richard & Barbara Roberts 2274 Westege Blvd. Mound MN 55364 Phillip Mitchum & Colleen Hentges 2232 Westedge Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Mary Ann Sells 2218 Westedge Blvd. Mound MN 55364 Alfred & Lois A. Sage 6351 Lynwood Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Steven & Beth Homola 2420 Westedge Blvd. Mound MN 55364 R.H. Development, Inc./Ron Helmer 4009 Heritage Hills Drive #103 Bloomington, MN 55437 Thau Nguyen 2395 Robin Lane Mound MN 55364 S. Baklund & M. Baklund 6245 Ladyslipper Circle Mound, MN 55364 R.A. Olson & G.H. Olson 6253 Ladyslipper Circle Mound MN 55364 S.A. Helland & B.S. Helland 6261 Ladyslipper Circle Mound, Mn 55364 V. Amerigo & M.L. Amerigo 6266 Ladyslipper Circle Mound MN 55364 M.A. Hope & M.M. Hope 6246 Ladyslipper Circle Mound, Mn 55364 Capital Model Home Corp. 14405 Walters Rd. #310 Houston, TX 77014 Dubose Model Home Company 14405 Walters Rd. #310 Houston, TX 77014 -4728- Thomas & Mary Muskat 2358 Robin Lane Mound MN 55364 Ronald Weber 6251 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 W.A. Schepers & S.D. Schepers 6225 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 K.A. Wilberg & B.L. Wilberg 6213 Sugar Mill Lane Mound. Mn 55364 R.S. Johnson & S.L. Bialon 6205 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 Donald L. Landon 6191 Sugar Mill Lane Mound. MN 55364 Gerald E. Wahl & Karen E. Wahl 6189 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 Kristin Vanderheuvel, et al 6165 Sugar Mill Lane Mound. MN 55364 N.J. Larsen & G.A. Larsen 6149 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 G.R. Meier & M.B. Meier 6137 Sugar Mill Lane Mound. MN 55364 J.A. Ricke & K.A. Ricke 6125 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 C.L. Wickland & G.A. Wickland 6113 Sugar Mill lane Mound. MN 55364 F.L. Shinnick & T.L. Shinnick 6107 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 N.L. Hoiseth & S.A. Hoiseth 6100 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 D.L. Nutter & T.T. Nutter 6126 Sugar Mill Lane Mound, MN 55364 M.W. Saunders & T.M. Saunders 6154 Sugar Mill Lane Mound. Mn 55364 Stanley & Audrey Heinsch 6177 Sugar Mill Lane Mound MN 55364 There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of (~~~ , 2002. ~1~ Notary Pubi~ -4729- October 7, 2002 (PROPERTY OWNERS NAME AND ADDRESS) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 22, 2002 at City Hall to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment for the Westedge Boulevard Improvement from County Road 15 to Woodedge Road. Adoption by the Council of the proposed assessment against abutting property and Langdon Bay may occur at the hearing. The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is (amount of assessment from roll). Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2003, and will bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31,2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is 6 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment according to City Code 370.10 is available. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $248,119.25. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal will be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owners is 1 -4730- filed with the municipal clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the city's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The Council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk 2 -4731 - Engineering · Planning o Surveying FRA September 19, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound West Edge Boulevard Street Improvements Preliminary Assessment Roll MFRA #7827 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: As requested, we submit herewith the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the West Edge Boulevard Street Improvement Project. The amount to be assessed has been calculated as follows: Construction Cost Contract Change Order No. 1 Revised Contract Amount Minus Water Service (Water Fund) Subtotal Contingency (3%) Total Construction Cost $ 211,027.75 $ 1,828.50 $ 212,856.25 $ - 751.25 $ 212,105.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 218,505.00 Engineering, Staking, Inspection, and Assessment Roll Preparation $ 65,600.00 Legal, Fiscal, and Administrative Cost $ 7,800.00 Total Project Cost $ 291,905.00 Please note that a three percent contingency has been included in the construction costs to cover any extra work that may be required. This project is still under construction; however we hope to have substantial completion by the time the assessment hearing is held on October 22. The final numbers can be adjusted down at that time, if the contingency is not required. The amount of the proposed assessment cannot be increased after the legal notices are published and mailed to the property owners. 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com -4732- Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council September 19, 2002 Page 2 The total amount to be assessed has been spread as follows: Assessment Spread City Share (15%) Rottlund Homes (75%) Mound Properties (10%) $ 43,785.75 $ 218,928.75 $ 29,190.50 Cost Per Langdon Bay Lot $218,928.75 + 74 lots = $ 2,958.50/lot Cost Per Mound Parcel $29,190.50 + 6.5 Parcels = $ 4,490.85/unit The developer of"Langdon Bay" had previously signed a Consent and Waiver Agreement, which allows the City to assess 75 percent of the cost of the street improvements to the Rottlund Development. The attached assessment roll has spread the 75 percent ($218,928.75) equally between the 74 lots or $2,958.50 per lot. The City of Mound had previously indicated the City's share would be 15 percent or $43,785.75. This leaves ten percent or $29,190.50 to be assessed to the benefiting property adjacent to the improvements. The City's present assessment policy uses a formula that includes a unit charge in additional to area and frontage. Since the abutting properties on this project are very similar in size and frontage, it is being suggested to assess only on a unit basis. One parcel has frontage on the project, but takes access from County Road 15; therefore it is suggested they be assessed one-half of a unit. The proposed per unit assessment is $4,490.85. The Feasibility Report prepared in September 2000 and revised February 20, 2001 showed a total estimated project cost of $209,900. This project was bid in June of 2001 and again in February of this year. This year's bid was slightly lower, however as noted, the total project cost is substantially higher than the cost projected in the Feasibility Report. The Feasibility Report indicated a proposed assessment of $2,127 per Langdon Bay lot and $3,816 per abutting parcel. If you have any questions or need additional information on anything in the assessment roll, please contact us. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:pry s 5main:hMou07827 :\Correspondence\m ayor9-17 -4733- mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ 0000000000000000000000000000000 ooo~~~ooooooccccccccccc ZZZ~~~ZZZZZZZ~~~ 0000000000000000000000 CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ < o E EEEE 000000000 0 0 0 CCCCCCCCC C C C ZZZZZZZZZ Z Z Z ooo°°$$55555555555555555ooooooooo°55555555 x×xooooooooooooooooooo ~zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz~~~ o00Oooooooooooooooooo~00ooo000o zzzOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuzzzzzzzzz m~mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzm~m~mm~m oooo~ CCCC ZZZZ ~mm m ~000~ 0 o uooo~ Z8 ~ ~ 0 o o Om~m - - 000 m ~ ~ ~zzz ~ 0 0 o000 0 C C mZZZ Z Z o060 ~~°°°° 0000000000000000000000000000000 -4734- ~ mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ZZ~ZZZZZZZZ~ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ~ZZZ~ZZZ ZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ o65S$$$$$S$~~~~~~ooS$~ =~oo ooo$$$S$$$E$$$6ooo$$ooo$$ $ ooooooooo ~~~ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzZzzzzz O0 000000000000oo000oo0oo000~00000000©0000 O000ZZZZZZZZZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOuzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzmmmmm~mm~zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz~mmmm~mmm~m oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~~ CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC ~'<~ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ o$$oo$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S$$$65~ 000000000000 0000000000 O000 O0 O0000000000 O000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 -4735- October 15, 2002 Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 To Whom it May Concern: This letter is to serve as a wdtten objection to the assessment of our property at 2232 Westedge Blvd. Property owners along Westedge Blvd are being assessed for a road that is not even totally within the City limits and the residents of Minnetdsta on the west side are getting the same improvements, without a penny out of their pockets. The Mound residents who are being assessed have property footage that ranges from 30 to over 150 feet on Westedge, but all are being assessed the same amount. What is the justification for assessing by parcel of land instead of footage? We realize there will be an assessment and we have no problem paying our fair share, but make it equitable. Sincerely, Phill Mitchum Colleen Hentges -4736- Mayor Mei-~cl 8, Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Langdon Bay Assessments / Westedge Road Honorable Mayor and distinguished council members, I am writing today to object to how the special assessments fbr Westedge road are being handled, Tltrough the governmental process, as you are well aware, R.I-I. Development agreed to pay for the construction of Westedge Road. As your also aware, this road is part owned by the C~ty nfMinnetri.qta Trying to be good neighbors and move our project forward we agreed to build the road. The figure to conslauct the road was $212,000.00 of which we would pay 75%. This comes out to be $2,148.65 per lot I received the assessment notice in the mail and was quite concerned that thc proposed assessment amount Is now $2,958.50 per lot, Alter inquiring about the cost increase (which was never discussed until now) I was told and I quote "someone has to pay for the engineering," To date, 1LH. Development has paid roughly $80,000.00 in engineering fees generated by the City (not including the proposed 60k for Westedge). My total project engineering was a tad over this amount, which begs the question; why must I now pay for engineering on a road owned by 2 rmm~eipalifies that is a colleetor gt~eet that I shall never benefit from mad why ehould it coot me a llke umomat to review the plans'? To be quite frank, the upgrade of Westedge road served literally no benefit to my project whatsoever. Hindsight being 20-20, I suppose I should ~ve had au attorney for this entire process, yet 1 personally feel that is the wrong way to conduct business. The unforturmte part of all of this is I had the oppommity to purchase the Holler property next to this site a month ago, yet informed Mr. Holler tuft after the way my company has been treated as an open check book cure all, I had no interest in pttrsuing b. is parcel as long as it was within the city limits of Mound. Attached is the front page of the 1* Amendment to the Development Agreement, which in my opinion pretty much spells out R.H. Developments obligation for your reference. Thank you, John I. Helmer Cc: John Dean, Kennedy & Graven Larry Outl~rie, Lindquist & Vennum -4737- FIRST AMENDMF. f~T TO DEVELOP~ AGRREMENT LANGDON BAY SUBDIVISION . TI'tiS AGp.~~, mado arid el~tered into ~ of~e ~y of ~~, 2~1 by ~d mc. a ~~ ~~ (~e "D~velo~"). ~ ~~ ~ ~el~m~ ~m~ ~~ Bay Su~ision (~ ~A~~)~ ~ ~~, it ~ ~w b~me ~~ m ~e ~n ~~ to ~e ~~ as NOW THEREFOR~ upon the consideration of Ll~ mutual promises and undert~ings of the l~u~ics hereto which each d~n~s to bc adequ~e, ~e parties hereby stipulate and asree as follows: ParaSmph :23 of the Asre~ment is amended to rc~d ~s follows: 2:LI Inmrovem~tsto,W.~tl~ The psrties dld on May % 2001 ~ order ~o p~rmit th~ D~v~loper ~ obgain Ce~tific~es of Occupancy and to p~s title ~o lots in I~1oll l~y fi~ o£t~ lien ofspec~l as~ssments ~or rJ~ W~ Road irnprovc~n~ms, it is ~h~ a~'e~l that th~ D~wlop~ will ~rn. _~sh fl~e eiBr with ~he s~:urity insUument described in Pamgra¢~ 23.2 below, and fl~ th~ City may draw on the ~ ~o p~pa~, in fi~ll, assessmen~ as ~1~ are approved by ~h~ Mound City Council but prior to certifi~on. ~ all other respects, the provisions oflhe ¢onse~ and Waiver Agr~emen~ will rm~fin in ~ull force and effect th . ~ ~,~oJa~ ~mpmmc0 Wltll the l:~l'ms or'thiS h e ~ and W~,v~r Am~em~t ,~-- w_._, ........... ~p 23.1 above and cost est~m~e ($157,425) for the proponionnte sham (?5%) of the West~d~ Road ~mprovcments assessed agninst all the lots in ~n Bay and 125% of the ensineers estimate ($20,990) of the proportionate sha~ 00%) o£the 0osts to be assessed against other properties benefited by the Wested~e Road improvements, Tim bank and ~ of the l~m~r of credit or other securit~ shall be subject to the approval ofthe City M_s~_ger, In the event there is a change of stares in the Developer's credit rating, or other event that would subject the letter oF credit to ~sn~llation, the bsmk shall noti~ th: City 30 days prior to can~fl~on. The devdoper shall have t0 days to reinstate that letter of credit or it will be drawn down, The City may draw down on the letter of credit to meet any obli~ntlou or' l~ev~oper uncler -4738- Mound Public Safety Facility 10/17/2002 Mound, MN Funding Source Lease Revenue bond Sale Project Funds HRA Contingency Water fund bond Proceeds Expenditures Prolect Development Costa A/E Base Fee A/E Reimbursables Scope Change Contingency Land Costs Legal Fees/Non Bond Financing Costs/Non Bond Soft Cost - Miscellaneous to date City Road & Utility Fees (SAC) Public Utility charges Geotechnical/Environmental Services Surveying Bid Advertisement and Printing Lease Cost of Temporary Facility Moving Costs (two moves) Construction Testing Furnishln~ls and Equipment FFE Audio visual Systems Secudty and Access Systems Telephone System Computer Network Budget Work Sheet June-02 Schematic Budget Estimate Total I Budget 5,350,000 Ehlers/City 500,000 Ehlers/City Ehlers/City 5,850,000~ SEH SEH SEH City of Mound Kennedy/Graven Miscellaneous MCES Excel Braun MFRA To be Bid In Construction Cost Sub-totals 371,250 SEH 30,500 SEH 50,000 SEH 0 C~ty 2,000 Kennedy Graven 3,000 Ehlers 48,832 City of Mound - Geno 2,400 City 50,000 MFRNAmcon 8,300 Amcon 8,000 City 30,000 Amcon 47,880 City 15,100 City 0 Amcon 667,262 Owner To be bid To be bid To be bid To be bid 132,000 City 8,500 City 14,400 City 17,200 City 3,700 City Sub-totals 175,800 Construction Cost Building Hard Costs Construction Manager Fee Site Improvements Demolition of Existing Removal of Well New (replacement well) Contingency/Bidding & Construction Recommended Alternates Uncommited Funds Contractors (to be bid) Amcon CM Included in Building To be bid Included in Demolition NOT included in project Sub-totals Totals (Fund Shortage) Estimated Add Alternates (Not included in estimate) Fish Scale' Roof - Excluding Hose Tower Medalion Grilles Sun Screen Louvers Clouds' 4,347,955 Amcon 128,500 Amcon 0 37,200 10,230 0 500,000 Amcon Max Steininger, Stevens Drilling City Amcon 100,000 Amcon 5,123,885 $5,966,947 (116'947~1 $76,500 $30,000 Waiting on pricing from vendor Waiting on pricing from vendor AMCON -4739- Owner DD cost est MPS.xls Total Project Cost Meeting Minutes Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting held on 09/2302 Date printed 09/24/02 The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, September 23, 2002 at Mound Fire Station: Present: Todd Christopherson Alcon TC Miles Britz SEH MB Kandis Hanson City KH Matt Simoneau City MS John McKinley City JM Greg Pederson City GP 1. GP - will have the revised lease done by next week. 2. Electrical design and requirements - will be reviewed next week at meeting. GP said they have located hot and cold water locations for the bay. GP asked about a system where hoses are hooked directly to truck exhaust pipes and automatically disconnect when the truck drives out. TC said that he had heard from another fire chief that they were problematic. GP said they have a similar system in Loretto that we could look at and investigate. The vendor had a large display at the national fire show in KC that GP had attended. 4. MB said we now have 3 of the 4 color samples from Hanson Spancrete. The one missing is the multi color river rock aggregate which is the least desirable of the 4 requested. 5. GP said some of the firefighters have expressed reservations about the green metal for the roof. Discussed the cornerstone. SEH will specify where and what design. The Masons have offered to donate, however, there will not be any Iogo's or names on the stone itself. A bronze plaque located in the building will designate those making contributions to the project. 7. The address 2415 Wilshire Boulevard. No change. 8. Kitchen equipment layouts have been revised. SB has the layouts. GP will measure the walk in cooler that may be re-used for this project. 9. GP said that there is a concern about the noise generated by the SCBA system and wonders if there would be a better location for it than on the mezzanine. Will review with SB. 10. Opening of bids Wednesday 12/4, Council Award on Tuesday, 12/10. Plans issued to contractors on 11/4. The next Council meeting after that is 1/14/03. TC said that if bids are opened on Wednesday. 11. KH updated the committee on the status of the partner cities and contract negotiations. 12. FFE was discussed. The budget for a movable file system was not included in either the FFE line or the building line. TC will include the estimate for this item in the upcoming building cost estimate and budget update. 13. The procurement of the chairs, tables, file cabinets, modular work stations will be done through a vendor that has the State Contract. Metro Systems has a state contract. Larry Volkers has talked with JM and GP about their process. They will provide design assistance at no extra charge and then sell the goods at the State Contract pricing sheets. 14. JM has a rough estimate from them for the police side and EOC, report room, training room is $78,000. The total police and fire FFE budget is $132,000. The only thing not in the Metro budget is the Fire side offices and the lobby furnishings. C:\WINDOWS~_ocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~'~lBO5CHI7~lPS 09 23 02.doc -4740- Page 1 of 2 MOUND Meeting field on 09/'2302 Date printed 09/24/02 15, The food service consultant is suggesting a $35,000 estimate for procurement of new and/or used equipment for the kitchen equipment. This is based upon using what they can re-use of the existing equipment. SB said that JA had reviewed this and determined that using existing and getting used equipment where possible could get this down to $13 - 16,000. 16. The two options on the moving file shelving that JM has investigated are motorized ($24k) and manual ($16k). TC will plug the lower number into the cost estimate for the building and SEH will specify and design the system so that it can be bid out with the building construction. 17. It was agreed that we will work with Metro. Molly from SEH will talk with Larry Volkers about getting the selection and pdcing of the furniture started. Atdp to the Eden Praide show room may be needed once the process is started. 18. The neighbor property was discussed - nothing has happened since the last meeting with them several weeks ago. 19. Next meeting will include discussion about door hardware. Jim Lock will be here to assist with developing a hardware schedule for the doors. 20. KH will be gone 9/28 through 10/2, The building meeting ended. The design meeting started. Jeff Anderson, Greg Palm, Tim Palm, and Sam Bontrager joined the meeting at this point. 21. Reviewed the precast samples. Hanson Spancrete has produced three additional samples and has one more coming. There will be a base bid on color and aggregate and an alternate to allow some flexibility after bids are received. We will ask the supplier to do another with even more red pigment - there is a concern that if it is not red enough, it may look pink. Some pointed to the Grand Casino in Hinckley as an example of a red precast building with green metal trim. 22. The metal roofing that will be an add alternate will have a "fish scale" pattern in lieu of a standing seam design. This will be more in keeping with the Mound design theme. 23. Discussed kitchen equipment and new layout. 24. Reviewed the SCBA requirements. It was agreed that the compressor would be on the mezzanine. Consideration would be given to noise and vibration control in the detailing of the room that will enclose the compressor for SCBA and the standard air compressor. 25. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy. C:\WINDOWS\Local SeEings\TemPorary Internet Files\Content.lESWIBO5CHI7~VlPS 09 23 02.doc -4741 - Page 2 of 2 ~TY OF MOUHD Meeting Minutes Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting held on 10/07/02 Date pdnted 10/15/02 The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, October 7, 2002 at Mound Fire Station: Present: Todd Christopherson ^mcon TC Matt Simoneau City MS Kandis Hanson City KH Greg Pederson City GP John McKinley City JM Steve Earl SEH SE Miles Britz SEH MB Don Geiger Amcon DG 1. Lease is at UP waiting for final comments from them. 2. Mechanical design is 98% completed. There is a meeting tomorrow at Emmanuelson Podas office. 3. We will be using a Geopier system for soil correction, however, we will not have to do the over excavation and import of expensive granular material as specified and bid last month. 4. There is some preliminary pricing that has been received from Geopier that TC will incorporate into the updated overall project cost estimate. 5. Rob from Hanson Spancrete will be at SEH on Wednesday to review the panel layouts and joint spacing. 6. MB reviewed some sketches of the exterior "knee walls" that are proposed to be limestone. 7. The segmented block retaining wall color has not been chosen, however, SEH suggests a limestone to match the limestone knee walls. 8. It was decided to use the light gray color limestone, not buff. The light gray will be consistent with the City's design standards for the other redevelopment projects. 9. Reviewed colored concrete option for the front driveway. The option will include two colors in a geometric pattern. MB to review with TL to simplify the design - it is a little "busy." 10. GP asked about anchoring a tent in the front drive as it is concrete - MB to investigate some options. 11. The kitchen plan was resolved last week. The grease trap for the kitchen was reviewed by Brian Ringsven, the mechanical engineer, with MS. It will be in the police garage. 12. TC will have updated budget ready for next week meeting. There will be one other estimate done between the DD estimate and issue of bid sets. The electrical will be better defined by then. For the current estimate, Amcon will use square footage costs for estimating electrical. 13. KH reported on member City negotiations. 14. TC will make report to Council at 11/12 meeting. 15. Frontier will be doing the phone systems - Kirk is the contact person that GP is talking with. 16. SE is doing the security layout based upon input from the committee. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~VlBO5CHI7~MPS 10 07 02.doc -4742- Page 1 of 2 CITY OF MOUHD Meeting held on 10/07/02 Date printed 10/15/02 17. Discussed the garage doors going into the police garage. JM asked about remote control of the doors. SE will look into some options for this. 18. Discussed the fencing at the south property line and screening. KH will approach neighbors one last time to see if the property swap can be worked out. The building meeting ended. The design meeting started. Jeff Anderson, Greg Palm, Tim Palm, Molly, Gus, Kevin, and Sam Bontrager joined the meeting at this point. 19. SEH brought a model of the office area which gave a good three dimensional view of the building at the administrative areas. 20. TC said he is concerned about the incremental costs of the various design items shown - the sail boat in the floor and wall, the sails in the ceiling with the soffits, the ceiling and floor/wall details in the fire truck display area, etc. Individually, these may not break the budget; however, the total of several of these can be substantial. 21. KH would like to have additional windows into the police area from the lobby. SEH is concerned about the bullet resistance of the wall and windows. 22. Discussed the voice transmission through the bullet proof glass. Molly has details of a system that is made by Diebold. An upgrade would be to go to an "earphone" which is a voice activated speaker system. 23. Discussed security and access during off hours to the building. 24. Carpet is between $20 and 22 per square yard installed price. Another carpet sample that Molly found has a wavy pattern that is about $22 called design weave. This material is in the Canadian Consulate building in Minneapolis. 25. Rubber backed carpet allows easier cutting and patching of damaged areas. 26. MB had additional precast samples for review. 27. Also reviewed were the metal roofing samples. 28. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~4BO5CHl'AMPS 10 07 02.doc -4743- Page 2 of 2 Meeting Minutes Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting held on 10/14/02 Date pdnted 10/15/02 The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, October 14, 2002 at Mound Fire Station: Present: Todd Christopherson Amcon TC Matt Simoneau City MS Kandis Hanson City KH Greg Pederson City GP John McKinley City JM Don Geiger Amcon DG Miles Britz SEH MB Sam Bontrager SEH SB 1. Lease agreement is at UP. 2. There are five Council meetings left in this year. The last one is 12/10~02. Our project schedule is tracking toward bid opening on 12/4 and Council award of some contracts at the 12/10 meeting. 3. Building design - there have been some changes to the areas below the mezzanine based upon recent discussions at this meeting. SEH to get GPa copy of these plan changes -they have been drawn. We will schedule one more meeting for electrical to review design and owner requirements. MB thinks that mechanical is probably done now and that plan should reflect all of previous owner input. GP to review a final set of plumbing drawings with the fire department to make sure it is right. The Geopier pricing has been reviewed by SEH and Amcon and is much closer to the budgeted amounts that we have anticipated. Their number is $120,000. Adding that to Amcon's estimate for site clearing, grading, and soil correction gets us to about $200,000. 6. MB reviewed the colors of the precast that have been refined based upon last week's review of the samples submitted. We will have a bid alternate for the red granite aggregate and the quartz will be the base bid. Discussed strategy for bid alternates and prioritizing. Talked about eliminating limestone walls and using poured concrete at the retaining walls adjacent to the front exterior stair. The other limestone walls that are not retaining earth could be eliminated altogether. Also discussed scaling back the lobby design, eliminating colored paving in front of the apparatus bay, and other ideas. 8. Price out the monument sign separately as an estimate from Amcon. KH will take this to Civic Organizations as potential donors toward the project. 9. Retaining wall shape and design are done. The color could be selected later- at this time it could be planned as grey so that it will match the grey limestone. 10. Kitchen layout is done. Do we still want to look at using the used cooler from Scotty's? There is room for it on the plan. GP to measure it and see if it will work. 11. Phone system - MB will meet with owner to review requirements for phone system. The locations have already been identified by SEH though input from owner. The system itself (equipment and wiring) will need to be determined and bid, however, the SEH drawings have the information required for the construction bids. 12. Computer information has been given to SEH on a preliminary basis. All phone jacks will be double to include phone and data connections using common box and conduit. The wiring will come later and will not be bid out in this phase. C:\WINDOWS~ocal Settings\Tempora~j Internet Files\Content. lE5~vlBO5CHI7~lPS 10 14 02 (1).doc -4744- Page 1 of 3 CITY OF MOUND Meeting held on 10/f4/02 Date printed 10/15/02 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. The furniture will be procured through the State/County bid system. The final locations of connections will be coordinated during construction after final furniture layout and specs are available. The SEH bid set will anticipate the approximate quantity of such connections and rough-ins. Reviewed bid schedule. Bid opening is 12/4 at 2 PM. GP to reserve Council Chambers. Nothing new regarding the partner cities' involvement and contract agreements for service and participation in building costs. Discussed the budget. The building construction estimate if approximatelY $4.5 million. This will be confirmed and sent out tomorrow, Amcon is waiting on a few prices from vendors still that should be available tomorrow AM. The budget for construction cost is $4.2 million. Discussed the room that will house the old fire truck. Need to study code requirements for drains, ventilation, and materials. SEH to review. GP mentioned that flooring is critical. Wayzata has a floor at their old station that GP likes. SEH to investigate. Amcon has budgeted $2 per square foot for the finish on those floors. DG mentioned that the personnel door shown on the overhead door to the museum area is very expensive. SEH said they have already changed the plan to make two separate doors. KH asked that Amcon push Xcel for a decision on what they will do with the "undergrounding" of the overhead lines. KH and GP to meet with neighbors regarding property acquisition discussions. Will need to add a pressure washer car wash station in the police parking area. SEH will consider a "shower curtain" in lieu of a hard surface wall to delineate the space and keep over spray from reaching other areas. Next week will be a longer meeting to cover all final design issues. Molly, Trent, Brian, and Steve will come here to review interior design, landscaping/site work, Mechanical, and Electrical layouts respectively. Will start the design meeting right at 4 PM to get through all of the issues by 6:30. Window blinds will be part of the FFE package. JM said that the lock on the soft interview room needs to be changed. Amcon will procure the residential style washeddryer stackable unit and set in place. SEH to design plumbing, electrical, and venting rough-ins for it and spec out a model and size for Amcon. The commercial washer dryer will be procured by GP. SEH needs specs in order to specify electrical loads. GP to get requirements to SEH. Elevator vendor is meeting with SEH tomorrow. Will confirm budget pricing in addition to spec requirements. Kitchen budget for equipment is $16,000. Amcon to incorporate into the specs. On the third floor, there is a dishwasher, stove, refrigerator. SEH to design soft copper lines for the refrigerator ice maker and the commercial coffee maker. SB reviewed the colored concrete for the front driveway. Decided to substantially minimize the amount of decorative jointing and multi-colored concrete. SEH to study and modify. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~IBO5CHl'AMPS 10 14 02 (1).doc -4745- Page 2 of 3 CITY OF MOUHD Meeting held on 10/14/02 Date pdnted 10/15/02 32. 33. 34. SB reviewed the updated monument designs. There are three different options shown. One of the three was chosen. Amcon will price this up as noted above for donation solicitations. MB reviewed the precast samples - final samples to be delivered Monday. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5WIBO5CHI7\MPS 10 14 02 (1),doc -4746- Page 3 of 3 -4747- -4748- -4749- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission and Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 2, 2002 (revised October 14, 2002) SUBJECT: Request by Hennepin County for review of conservation classification list # 1216 and municipal authorization for possible sale in 2003 APPLICANT: Hennepin County LOCATION: Intersection of Cardigan Lane and Wilshire Boulevard PID: 19-117-23-31-0102 ZONING: R-2 Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential / non-conservation SUMMARY The City of Mound received a request from Hennepin County on or around August 27, 2002 regarding the status of a tax-forfeit property located on Wilshire Boulevard (address unassigned) and requesting a determination from the City of Mound whether or not it should be released. REVIEW PROCEDURE Presently, there is no formal review process in the City Code that deals with tax-forfeit properties. However, a 1997 in-house policy created an informal procedure to respond to such requests and and requires review by City staff and the Planning Commission and the Park Commission. Additionally, a 1984 resolution established a policy regarding the payment of assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit properties prior to forfeiture. Copies of both documents have been included as attachments. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Parcel Information. Size: Legal Description: 3064 SF Part of Lot 6, Block 5, Avalon (metes and bounds description) Address: Unassigned -4750- Ownership: Hennepin County Property Tax Status: According to Hennepin County, the subject property is vacant and is tax exempt CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire ChiefPederson No comments. Acting Police Chief McKinley No concerns from Police Department. City Manager Hanson The City Manager supports properties not on the tax rolls being combined with adjacent properties except for fire lanes. Public Works Director Skinner No comments. Building Official Simoneau No comments. City Engineer Cameron This parcel has no value to the City from an engineering perspective. The City already owns the entire block across the street to the west. If this parcel is released for sale it should be sold only to an adjacent property owner and combined with their parcel since this lot is not buildable on its own. Parks Director Fackler Review by POSAC or DCAC not required. Comm. Dev. Director Smith The subject property does not meet minimum lot size requirements of 6000 SF and therefore should only be sold to an adjacent property owner. In the event the parcel is released and sold by Hennepin County it would need to be combined with the adjacent property. Lot combination is not regulated by the City of Mound and can be done administratively at Hennepin County. -4751 - PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION As the request from Hennepin County for review of PID # 19-117-23-31-0102 and a determination whether or not it should be released is being reviewed by the Planning Commission on Monday, October 21, 2002 which immediately precedes the City Council meeting, City staff will provide a verbal report of the Planning Commission' s recommendation (if any) at the Council meeting. -4752- 9-117 2 -'..: ' -,5 .:' ~o 6 ~5 BRUNSWICK t 40 40j40 ~0 r ~ 40 ,t0 .~ ,~a 40 55 RiCNMOND ~ DOf:;'CMESTER' ,zs J~ RD . . . · 40J 40 j 40j ~o/.J 4,)..J.z 55 I J~ z§j 40. J.4.g.l.,~o j 40 i 40 j 40 i 40 i..~o I 4:). (2) -4753- Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department A-600 Hennepin County Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota $5487-0060 August 27, 2002 BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQU ESTEr~ BONNIE RITTER, CITY CLERK CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 RE: Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List#1214 CINC The lands as described on Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List # 1214 C/NC, were classified as either conservation lands or non-conservation lands, as is appropriate, by the County Auditor's Administrative Review Board. Enclosed is a copy of County Auditor's Directive No. 2002-15 providing for the classification of the lands, under authority granted in accordance to Minnesota Statute 282.135 by the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners. As required under M.S. 282.01, the department requests that your city officials review Conservation/Non-Conservation List # 1214 C/NC. When municipal review has been completed, the department will require a certified copy of a municipal resolution that resolves and approves parcels for public auction, for auction to adjacent owners, or requests public use conveyance or nonpublic sale to your city. It should be noted that certain changes in tax-forfeited land procedures were made by the Minnesota Legislature as part of the 2001 Tax Reform Law. See enclosed Exhibit A, an outline for suggested points that should be covered in your municipal resolution. Please be advised that the sale of the lands shall be deemed to be approved pursuant to M.S. 282.01, Subd. I, if the city council fails to respond to this classification notice within sixty (60) days of receipt of certified mail. The deadline for responding will be on or about October 31, 2002. Please contact Terry Schuhler, Property Tax Services unit leader, at (612)-348-3734 or (612)-596-6527(voice mail), should you need further assistance or clarification. Sincerely, Patrick H. O'Connor, Director Taxpayer Services Department Jeffrey L. Strand, Supervisor Tax-Forfeit and Property Revenue Section PHO:JLS:tls ~'. '. :' :Er~cloSures · .. ' · An Equal Opportunity Employer - 4754- Recycled Paper -4755- 008@ RESOLUTION NO. $2-.8-612 The following r~solutio'n was offered by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Kremer: WIqEREAS, numerous requests are received For sale or conveyance oF tax forfeited land to municipalities and other governmental subdivisions .of the State, BE IT RESOLVED that it is the general pol.icy of the Hennep~n County Board to encourage the return of tax forfeited lands within the county to private ownership and the tax rolls., provided that governmental subdivisions · are not discouraged from acquiring lands to be used for conservation, recreation or other purposes as detailed in this resolution. BE' IT RESOLVED that tax forfeited land will be conveyed to governmental subdivisions without monetary consideratt'~n if: 1~ The land t~ to be u~ed for park~, wetlands, flood c.ontrol~ trailways, open ~p~ce; ~tr~et~ road~ rtgl~t~ of way and public access, or 2, the land (~ valued at the receipt of applica't~on at. SI,D00 or less per parcel at ctlrrent values) or an equivalent value a~ indexed at ten percent per annum hereafter, regardless of public use or purpose, and BE IT RESOLVED, that except as otherwise provided in this resolution, tax forfeited land will not be conveyed to governmental subdivisions unless the current appKaised value is paid, and BE .IT RESOLVED that an application shall be required to request a conveyance WithOUt payment or a ~ale and the appt4cation shall be accompanied by a resolution of th~ §~vePning body ~pecifyi~lg'~.he public pur,po~e or ihtended publie use for wht'ch the tax Forfeited land i~ being acquired. An application wi.li not be considered unless received at ~:]e~.t ten days prior to the first publication of the notice o.f public saie of the Subject property, and BE IT RESOLVED that the acquisition of tax forfeited land by a gover.nmental subdivision (except Housing and Redevelopment Authorities and other govermnental subdivisions..of the ~tate~ex,pressly authorized' by law~o resell; lease 'or transfer property) for resale' shall not be approved by the Board ., " BE IT RESOLVED that the purchase price be paid over a thtee~year'ipe6ioU commencing~::on date o'f sale if the governmental subdiv~sio~ has budget 6r levy limit~tlons that do not permit cash purchase. Interest shall be payable at the rate prescribed by law for sales to the public of similar'property, and 'l BE I'T RESOLVED that municipalities are urgeO to judiciously exercise thefr egitimate rights of disapproval of sale and classification of taX forfet'ted. ]and in the context of this res.Olution, and , -4756- " .... AUG 1 0 19.82 Office of the County Auditor No. 2002-15 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota COUNTY AUDITOR'S DIRECTIVE (Tax-Forfeited Land) To all persons interested in the lands hereinafter described: Whereas, pursuant to legal authority as provided under Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.135, the Director of Taxpayer Services Department, acting in the capacity of County Auditor-Treasurer, has had the matter hereinafter described come before the County Auditor for administrative review; and Whereas, pursuant to the application or request for change of status of tax-forfeited land described more fully, below, the undersigned Deputy County Auditor finds as follows: 1. That the Hennepin County Auditor hereby certifies the Conservation or Non- Conservation status and authorizes public sale of all Non-Conservation classified parcels of land on Conservation or Non-Conservation Classification List 1214 C~NC, on file with the Hennepin County Auditor, except where Conservation. classification status is noted on said list, and further certifies that all parcels therein have been viewed and comply With the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 85.012, 92.461,282.01, Subd. 8,282.018, Subd. 1, and 282.018, Subd. 2, and other statutes that require the withholding of tax-forfeited land from sale; and that the Hennepin County Auditor hereby requests approval, where appropriate and necessary, from the Minnesota Departr~ent of Natural Resources for the sale of tax-forfeited land listed on Conservation or Non- Conservation Classification List 1214 C-NC. August 26, 2002 (OFFICIAL SEAL) Patrick H. O'Connor, County Auditor · I///L~ Marie A. Kunze Deputy County Auditor -4757- Staple All CorreSpondence Application by a Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax-Forfeited Lands for an Authorized Public Use " (Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01,' Subdivisions la through lc) '(Note: If the governmental subdivision has pumhased the property., use PT Form 80) In Hennepin County Name of governmental subdivision (applicant): . Mailing address of applicant: Date requested property was forfeited to the State: "(month) (day) (year) Legal description Of property (include the name of the city/town in which the property i~ located): Describe the intended publi? use to be made of the property (be specific, including statute or specia! law references, if relevant): State the need for the propirty (be specific;' e.g,, 'why this property instead of some other p~opertyT): Please check the appropriate box: BI There are one or more wells on this property ['-] There are no wells on this property A Wetland!.Certification Form Must Be Attached To This Application Return application to: MN Dephrtment of Revenue®Property Tax Division®Mall Station 3340®8t. Paul, MN 55146-3340 -4758- ' STATE OF.MINNESOTA ) )ss. CounW of ~!.emmp{n ) . .. · · being, fa:st dtfly sworn, d~poses and says that he/she is the authorized representative of the applicant named herein, that he/she has ~ead said application and knows the contents"th~reof, and tha~'the matters stated therein are true and correct. . .; ' .., .. :. Name Title Subscribed and sworn ~ before me this day of ,1'9 Notary .Public, ' County, .Minn. My commission expires RECOMMENDATION Ok COUNTY BOARD UPON APPLICATION The County Board of Hennepin County, Minnesota, thinnish its County Audit~)r, Pursuant'to Minnesota Statutes 282.135, and Hennepin County Resolution No. 95-$-556R1, has reviewed the application of the City of dated , for the conveyance for an authorized public use of certain tax- forfeited land described therein. The county board recommends that this application be: rejected. ~ranted ~ Signatur~ of Manager of Taxpayer Services Division Date (for County Board) CERTIFICATION OF COUNTY AUDITOR oR LAND COMMISSIONER ! have taken the necessary steps required by Minnesota Statutes to prepare the herein described tax-fOrfeited land for conveyance for an authorized public use. Signature of County Auditor or Land Corarnissioner Date OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF KEVENUE ....... S.t. Paull'Mj~;, Upon due consideration of this applic:afion, it is ordered that it is hereby: rejected. t9 granted CommiSsioner of Revenue -4759- By Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: ~ ;~ ~ ::¥.~ · rope~ ~D ~ ~.'.';'~":::is'" ~' ~' "~:~:':*K~"~.~:~:' * ' ' ' >.~'.* ~*.::~' ' ' '." ~ Property ID: .......... Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Hennepin County, Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 ........ :':':*~:': ............. ~:*:':':':':':'>::~ 19-117-23-31-0102 85 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MOUND 277 Construction year: 3 Parcel Size: W 35X83X40~ HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: AVALON Lot: 006 Block: 005 Metes & Bounds: THAT PART OF LOT 6 BLK 5 LYING NLY OF A LINE DRAWN FROM A PT ON W LINE THOF DIS 5 FT N OF SW COR THOF TO A PT ON SLY LINE THOF DIS 50 FT E OF SW Note: This is a Partial Metes & Bounds Descripti Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 http://www2, co. hennepin, mn. us/pi ns/pi dresult.j s_~47 60 - 8/30/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 200t Values: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type VACANT LAND Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status RESIDENTIAL NON- HOMESTEAD EXEM PT 8555 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cot Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati¢ Send e-mail to Henn.Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http ://www2. co.hen'hepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult.j so -4761 - 8/30/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 08/07/2002 at 1:00:00 PM Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for. the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder~co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 80Ox600 screen resolution. This application requires Intemet Explorer 3.02 or Nets(ape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http ://www 19. co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrimap.dll?name=Hennepin&Cmd=ZOOMOUT... 8/30/2002 -47~2- Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Property ID 19-11 ?-23-31-0102 Property Address ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MOUND, MN 0 Last update: 08/07/2002 at i:00:00 PM Approximate Property Perimeter 237 ft. Market Value Approximate Property Area 3,064 sq.ft. = 0.07 acres Total Tax (2002) $ $ .oo Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder(~,co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 80Ox600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http://wwwl9.co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrimap dll?name=Hennepin&Cmd=Identify&Le... 8/30/2002 -47B3- Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, lVlN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 08/07/2002 at 1:00:(~0 PM Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder~.co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http ://www 19. co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrimap.dll?name=Hennepin&Cmd=ZOOMOUT... 8/30/2002 -4764- MEMORANDUM DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2002 TO: SARAH SMITH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: CITY OF MOUND - LANGDON BAY - LETTER OF CREDIT MFRA File No. 12754 We have reviewed the request by R H DeVelopment, t6 reduce their letter of credit and the supporting data provide by their Engineer, Paul Thomas of Pioneer Engineering. The request appears to be in order and we recommend approval to reduce the letter of credit to the new amount of $246,986.76. Please advise if you need any additionaI information. 15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 -4765- JCAMERON(~MFRA.COM (763)476-6010 FAX (763) 476-6532 S~xa Smith City' of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Langdon Bay I~tter of Credit At this time I am requesting a reduction in our Letter cf Credit, Please co~.tact me ~ (952) 898- should you wish To diaeua.~ auytldag or have say quest/ora. Thank you for your time and consideration per this request. Sincerely, lolm J. I-telmer -4766- Oct 14 02 04:51p Pioneer En~ineerin~ 8S1S819488 p.i engineerJng Civil Engineers - Land Planners o Land Surveyors . Landscape Architects October I4, 2002 Ms. Sarah J. Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Langdon Bay P.E. Job #100355 Dear Ms. Smith: The developer is requesting the city to reduce the securities at Langdon Bay. The following is a summary of the security held per the developers' agreement versus work complete and the requested reduction. Item Estimated Cost 1. Streets $357, 819.95 2. Utilities $412,755.20 3. Sidewalks $36,750.00 4. Grading $336,816.95 5. Survey $20,000.00 Monumentation 6. Landscaping $40,000.00 7. Street lights $13,200.00 8.Bu£fer $4,000.00 Monumentation 9. Park $30,000.00 Improvements Total $1,251,342.10 Security (115%) $411,492.94 $474,668.48 $42,262.50 $387,339.50 $23,000.00 $46,000.00 $15, I80.00 $4,600.00 $34,500.00 $~,439,043.42 Percent Complete 75% 95% 95% 95% 20% 10% 100% 0 0 Reduction Requested $308,619.71 $450,935.06 $40,149.37 $367,972.52 $4,600.00 $4,600.00 $15,180.00 0.00 0.00 $1,192,056.66 2422 Enterprise Drive * Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 o (651) 681-1914 · Fax 681-9488 625 Highway 10 N.E. o Blaine, Minnesota 55434 - (763) 783-1880 o Fax 783-1883 -4767- Oct 14 02 04:51p Pioneer Engineerin~ 6516819488 E E I::1 civ, Engineers. Land Planners- Land Surveyors. Landscape Architects engineer, lng Please review the above summary and reduce the security to a new total of $246,986.76. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, ENGINEERING, P.A. PAT/jg CC: John Cameron, McCombs, Frank, Roos & Assoc. John Helmer, RH Development 2422 Enterprise Drive - Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 o (651) 681-1914 o Fax 681-9488 625 Highway 10 N.E. ° Blaine, Minnesota 55434 o (763) 783-1880 · Fax 783-1883 -4768- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission and Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 14, 2002 SUBJECT: Waiver of platting and variance approval to subdivide Lots Block 10, Woodland Point APPLICANT: Marshall and Stacie Middlestaedt PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-28 / 02-37 LOCATION: 1625 Eagle Lane PID: 13-117-24-12-0178 ZONING: R- 1A Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential 7, 8, 9, 16, and 17, SUMMARY The Planning Commission and City Council will review a request from Marshall and Stacie Middlestaedt, applicants and property owners at 1625 Eagle Lane, for "waiver of platting" approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 7, 8, 9, 16, 17, Block 10, Woodland Point in order to create a new "buildable" parcel which would front Dove Lane. The proposed new legal descriptions are as follows: Parcel A Parcel B Lots 7-9, Block 10, Woodland Point Lots 16 & 17, Block 10, Woodland Point The applicants are also requesting variance(s) approval to recognize an existing non-conforming front yard setback for the existing house located on Lot 7 and a "new" variance for the existing garage on Lot 9 which will become non-conforming as a result of the waiver request as the property will lose its "lot of record" status and is therefore subject to a minimum side yard setback often (10) feet. Currently, the garage is located (9.5) feet from the property line on the south side. SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 330:12 states that any parcel of land, either platted or unplatted that has been combined for tax purposes or other reasons, cannot be re-separated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of the subdivision ordinance. A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City Council atSer receipt of the background information provided by City staff -4769- The waiver of platting and release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be in compliance with all City codes. The City may impose conditions to the waiver. Applications for waiver of platting do not require review by the Planning Commission. However, if it so desires, the City Council may remand the application to the Planning Commission if it determines that their advice will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. If the application for a waiver of platting request requires any variance from any City code requirement, the waiver application must be processed in accordance with City Code Section 330:170 and shall be referred to the Planning Commission and processed as any other variance request under the subdivision ordinance. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Ownership. Marshall and Stacie Middlestaedt are the owners of the property at 1625 Eagle Lane which consists of five (5) platted lots. They are proposing to split off.Lots 16 & 17 in order to create a new "buildable" parcel. It is City staff' s understanding that they have signed a purchase agreement to sell the proposed new lot subject to City approval. Property Tax Status. According to Hennepin County property tax records, the subject property is considered to be one parcel and is legally described as Lots 7, 8, 9, 16, and 17, Block 10, Woodland Point. Certificate of Survey. A certificate of survey for the subject property dated October 14, 2002 was prepared by Gronberg & Associates and has been included as an attachment. While no construction is contemplated as a part of the current waiver of platting request, the applicant(s) have demonstrated a building pad on proposed Parcel B (Lots 16 & 17) which meets the requirements of the R- 1A District. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map included in the Mound Comprehensive Plan guides the property for future low-density residential use (1-6 units / acre.) Adjacent Land Uses. The subject property is surrounded on all sides by low-density residential use. 2 -4770- Zoning. The subject property is zoned R-IA single family residential. The following table includes the lot area, width and setback requirements of the R- 1A District: Lot Area Width Depth Front Side Rear Setback Setback Setback(s) R-lA 6,000 SF 40 FT 80 FT 20 FT 10 FT 15 FT ParcelA 9600 SF 120 FT 80 FT 14.3 FT (house) 12.9 FT/9.5 FT* 31 FT (garage) Parcel B 6400 SF 80 FT 80 FT N/A N/A N/A The applicants are requesting a variance to recognize the non-conforming front setback of (14.3) feet for the existing house on Lot 7. As a result of the proposed subdivision, the side setback for the garage on Lot 9 will become non-conforming as the new minimum setback requirement for non-lots of record changes from six (6) feet to ten (10) feet and the existing garage is presently located (9.5) feet from the property line on the south side. The shed located in the southwest corner of Lot 9 is in a conforming location. Non-Lot of Record Status. In the event the waiver of platting request is approved, the subject property will lose its "lot of record" status and therefore will be subject to the standard provisions of the R-lA zoning district. As previously mentioned, the minimum side setback for non-lots of record is ten (10) feet. Additionally, hardcover is limited to no more than thirty (30) percent. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire ChiefPederson No comment. Acting Police Chief McKinley No comment. Public Works Director Skinner Lots 16 and 17 have no sewer or water available as the City's water and sewer mains do not presently extend to Lots 16 and 17 along Dove Lane. Please also refer to report from City Engineer John Cameron. Building Official Simoneau A building permit will be required for any proposed new dwelling including the submittal of all required information and shall be subject to all provisions of the Uniform Building Code as well as local regulations. City Attorney John Dean Request qualifies for "waiver of platting" approval under City Code Section 330:12 even though utilities need to be extended along Dove Lane. 3 -4771 - City Engineer Cameron See memorandum provided as separate attachment. Parks Director Fackler No comment. NOTIFICATION While City Code does not require public notification, current City policy indicates that adjacent property owners are notified as a courtesy. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that notification regarding the request was forwarded to the adjacent property owners on October 18, 2002. GENERAL COMMENTS Approval of the proposed waiver of platting does not constitute or guarantee future approval of any building permit(s) or any other necessary approval by any other public agency. In the event the waiver request is approved, Parcel A or Parcel B will no longer qualify for "lot of record" status. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the waiver of platting and variance applications from Marshall and Stacie Middlestaedt for Lots 7, 8, 9, 16 and 17, Block 10, Woodland Point subject to the following conditions: Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request and shall be required to submit an escrow deposit of $1000.00 prior to the release of the resolution. This amount shall be addition to any required utility escrow deposit. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit applications, when appropriate. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 5. All conditions from the City Engineer as referenced in his report dated October 17, 2002. If the resolution is released prior to the installation of municipal utilities and other related work, a utility escrow deposit or other acceptable financial guarantee (ie. letter of credit) of $20,000 shall be submitted. 4 -4772- 7. One(l) park dedication fee is paid. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In order to accommodate a proposed closing date of October 24, 2002 in the event the subdivision is approved, the waiver of platting and variance applications from Marshall and Stacie Middlestaedt has being expedited at the request of the applicants. As the Planning Commission's review is being held on Monday, October 21, 2002 which immediately precedes the October 22, 2002 City Council meeting, City staffwill present the Planning Commission's recommendation at the meeting. Members of the Planning Commission and City Council are advised that the "concurrent review" was discussed in advance with Mayor Meisel and City Manager Hanson. 5 -4773- WAIVER OF PLATTING APPLICATION '"" ~ ~' :'' City Council Date: Application Fee:S50 ~istribution: City Planner DNR Public Works Parks City Engineer Other Escrow DepositS200.00 Case No. Deficient Unit Charges? Delinquent Taxes? Variance Required? Please type or print clearly PROPERTY Subject Address / (7 ~ < ,~'C~--.~ ~ ~ ~ INFO LEGAL DESCRIPTION PID~ t ~ I / ~ ~q /; ~ I ~ ~ Plat ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION B. Lot(s) Block ZONING Ci'rcle: R-1 ~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 DISTRICT PROPER~ Are there existing structures on the prope~? yes ~ Do the existing structures comply with the zoning ordinance for setbacks', hardcover, etc.? yes / no APPLICANT The applicant is: ~wner other: OWNER Name (if other than applicant) Address Phone (H). (W). (M). SURVEYO~ Name ENGINEER Address Phone (H). (W) (M). Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, COnditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, (~K~ no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. / Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted hereWith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this. application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Revised 06/.2 8/02 ~ -4774- ............ VARIANCE _APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: ~,~2-472-0G07, Fax: liS2-472-0G20 PAID OOT 0 1 2OO2 OtTY OF MOUND Application Fee: $200.00 (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: Case No. Distribution: City Planner DNR City Engineer PARK Public Works Other SUBJECT Address ! U,~ ~_~ ~ ' PROPERTY Lot "'"] I ¢l ~ U LEGAL Block DESC. Subdivision ~) PID# Pla~ ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 OWNER Xddres~ 1~ Phone APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER Address THAN Phone OWNER) (H) (W), (U). Has an ap )lication~e~er been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for thi resolution property? ) yes,~,no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, number(s) and provide copie of resolutions. ' Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Revised 04/24/01 -4775- · varia-~d~ A~Plication, P. 2of3 Case NO: ...... Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (), No~. If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i,e, setback, lot ar'ea-; etc,): o SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ( N ~/'~) ~ ff. [~1 ~,, , ft. Side Yard: ((~S~.~'~ W ) I 0" ff. ~ 'b" ff. ~" ft. Side Yard: (' N('S,,,E VV~) ]0' ff. J~'Ci" ff. -~ ft. Rear Yard: ( N'S E ~/2) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: ( N S E ~V) ft. ft. ft. · (NSEW) ff. ff. ff. Street Frontage: ft. / ~ 0 ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft ~'~)_ sq ft sq ft Hardcover: ~bO0 sq ff ¢,~~"~q ft ~ sq ff Doe%the pre~.ent use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Y~/")~'~'/No,~ If no, specify each non?onforming use: o Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: Revised 04/24/01 - 4776- variance Was the hardship described above created by the action of an/yone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No~). If yes, explain: Was the hard,ship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), NoM. If yes, explain: o Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature(~~_~, ~-J~ ~/~ ~.pplicant's Signature Date Revised 04/24/01 - 4777- CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) LOTAREA _~/'"/00 SQ. FT. X30%= (for all lots) LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. L LOT ARF_Jk SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) .................. ' Existing Lots of Record may havb 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are u~Jlized as ou~lned in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B,1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = DETACHED BUILDINGS (GAPAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. TOTAL House .................................................... X = 4 X -" TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening between boards) with a pervious sudace under are not counted as hardcover. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ X = X = TOTAL DECK ....................................................... X = TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................................................................... PREPARED By Revised 04/01/02 , -4778- CITY OF MOUND FIARDCOVER CALCULATION,~ (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) OWNER'S NAME: LOT AR~ ~¢~ LOT AREA LOT AREA SQ, FT. X 30%= (for all lots) ....................................... SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage prOVided that techniques are utilized, as Outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:12~.5, Subd. 6.B,1 (see back), A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. HOUSE LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS... ~ _- /, Z~ ..... , ...... ~;~ ......... TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening between boards) with a per~ous.sugace under are not counted as hardcover. TOTAL DECK ....................................................... X = TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDOOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................................................................... RECEIVEr'. PREPARED BY Revised 04101102 CCD ~ C 9nn,~ DATE ~,~ =.-.- I I' U t~tJND PLANtvH'v~ & INSR -4779- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND PROPOSED PROPERTY DIVISION FOR STACIE MITTELSTAEDT IN LOTS 7, 8, 9, 16 & 17, BLOCK 10, , ~:~ WOODLAND POINT HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA / / ~eO. oo ; ,' l / ; PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRJPTI~ 02--390 -4780- GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES;INC, SURVEYING, ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING 445 N. WILLOW DRIYE LONG LAKE, MINNESOTa 55356 952-473-414 I F~: 952-473-~35 October 15, 2002 Stacie Mittelstaedt C/O Bumet Title 4100 Berkshire Lane Plymouth, MN 55446 Dear Stacie: We estimate the cost to extend sewer and water to your property line for Lots 16 & 17, Block 10, Woodland Point to be $3500. Sincerely, Gronberg & Associates, Inc. Mark S. Gronberg, P.E. & L.S. -4781 - MEMORANDUM DATE: October 17, 2002 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Sarah Smith, Mound Community Development Director John Cameron, Mound City Engineer City of Mound Middlestaedt Waiver of Platting 1625 Eagle Lane Case #02-28 and 37 MFRA #13899 As requested, we have reviewed the Middlestaedt Waiver of Platting and have the following comments and recommendations: Grading and Drainage The survey submitted with the application does not show plans for placement of a proposed house on Parcel B, the vacant lot to be created by this division of property. A complete grading and drainage plan will need to be submitted when application is made for a building permit. ° The City's record plans show that the concrete curb and gutter ends at a catch basin at approximately the center of Lot 17. There is also a culvert under Dove Lane that extends into Lot 17 at an angle to the northeast. This culvert is the inlet for a drainage ditch coming from the north along the back lot lines of this block. None of this information is shown on the survey submitted with the application. The final grading plans will need to accommodate these drainage ways and City storm sewer. -4782- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mail: mfra@mfra, com Ms. Sarah Smith October 17, 2002 Page 2 o This is another of the older plats in the City, which typically did not provide drainage easements along lot lines. Therefore drainage easements should be provided along all exterior lot lines of both parcels. Utilities Parcel B, which fronts on Dove Lane, is not presently served by either City water or sanitary sewer. The closest sanitary sewer is located two lots to the north and the watermain is approximately one lot northerly. The applicant would be responsible for extending both utilities to serve this parcel, which will include replacement of approximately 100 feet of street (Dove Lane). All this work must be done to City standards. We do not believe the estimate of $3,500.00 is even close to what the actual cost could be. The soils in this area of Dove Lane are probably marginal and extra granular material may be required for both the utility construction and street repairs. This small utility extension could cost as much as $15,000.00. If the waiver of platting is granted, it should be conditional upon the applicant furnishing final construction plans for the utility extensions and street repairs. A complete cost estimate or actual bids must also be provided. The plans will need to be approved, not only by the City, but also the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Health Department before the construction may commence. Miscellaneous Records indicate that this large parcel (all five lots) were combined and assessed only one unit charge when the streets in this area were reconstructed in the late 1970s. It has been City policy to collect these deferred unit charges when properties are re-divided and additional building sites are created. Therefore this property should have one additional unit or $1170.90 charged to Parcel B. Recent revisions to the City Code requires that sanitary sewer and watermain area trunk charges in addition to the connection fees must be paid on all new building sites. The present area trunk charges are $1,500.00 each for sewer and water and a connection fee of $240.00 each for sewer and water connections. We are suggesting that the City should consider waiving the area trunk charges, since this parcel is not served by City utilities. The connection fees should still be collected. Recommendations 1. Final grading and drainage plan to be approved by the City Engineer at time of building permit application. The plans must also show the City's storm sewer and ditch system. -4783- Ms. Sarah Smith October 17, 2002 Page 3 o Provide drainage and utility easements along all exterior lot lines of both parcels, five feet wide on the side and rear lot lines and ten feet in width along the front lot lines. The extension of both the sanitary sewer and watermain and related work, must be completed by the applicant prior to release of the resolution approving the waiver of platting or some type of financial guarantee provided such as cash escrow, a letter of credit or performance bond. 4. The construction plans for the utility extensions must be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. Approval from the MPCA and Health Department must be secured by the applicant. 5. One (1) deficient street unit charge in the amount of $1,170.90 shall be paid. 6. Waive the sanitary sewer and watermain area trunk charges. sAmain:knou 13899\correspondenceksmithl 0-16 -4784- 1625 Eagle Lane 9 i0 1¸5 14 17 1 f; l? -4785- Hennepm county Map Server Page 1 of 1 Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax hrtfo Last update: 07/03/2002 at 1:01:01 PM Property ID Approximate Approximate Property Perimeter Property Area 13-1t7-24-12-0178 556 ~. 15,903 sq.ft = 0.366 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2002) 1625 EAGLE LA MOUND, MN 55364 $ 106,000 $ 978.54 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected .... "' "~ ,..'.,: ' . '.: :::~'il'"u:' i,~'~.' ...: '~' .~':'"' This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the matedal heroin contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives, if map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob.Mouldert~co,hennopin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hermepin C0un~ http://www~ 9~c~hennepin~mn~us/scripts/esrimaD~d~?name=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALU~ 7/23/2002 -4786- ~roperty lnIormauon ~/earch by :Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: HOUSE or BUILDING #: 1625 STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters) eagle UNIT # (if applicable) 20 ..._~i records per page Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database-is updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9: l S p. rn. (CST) Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax Statement 13-117-24-12-0178 1625 EAGLE LA MOUND 277 3 Construction year: 1920 Parcel Size: IRREGUL/ M MITTELSEAEDT/S M HEITZ MARSHALL MITTELSTAEDT 1625 EAGLE LA MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. Sale Date: September, 2000 Sale Price: $105,000 Transaction Type: Warranty Deed Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: WOODLAND POINT' Lot: Block: 010 Metes & Bounds: LOTS 7 8 9 16 AND 17 Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: $106,000 Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: $94,200 $94,2OO $960.59 $17.95 http:#www2.co.herm~in.mn.us¢~s/addrresult.im -4787- 7/23/2002 rroperty mtormauon ~earcn oy ~treet Aaaress F, estttt page Page 2 of 2 Total Tax: $978.54 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of Jan uary 2, 2001 Values: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $41,500 $64',500 $106,000 $36,9OO $57,30O $94,2O0 RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD 1727 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to co Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati, Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co. hennepin, mn. us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http ://www2. co. hennep in. mn. us/pins/addrre sult. -4788- 7/23/2002 This information sheet only summarizes a portion ct tl~e requirements OUtllnea In [ne ~.l[y (3r IVlOUna &oning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 4-~2-0600. General Zoning Information Sheet R- 1 A Zoning District - Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS - Lot Area, Lot Width, and Setback Requirements: Minimum Lot Area ..................................... 6,000 sq ~Jare feet Minimum Lot Width ............................................ 40 feet Front Yard Setback ............................................ 20 feet Side Yard Setback ............................................ 10 feet* Rear Yard Setback ............................................ 15 feet* Minimum Lot Depth ,..: ....................... ': ................ 80 feet Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback .............................. 50 feet Minimum Floor Area Requirement: ........................... 840 square feet Minimum !ct frontage on an improved public street shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on a cut-de-sac shall be 40 feet at the front building setback line (i.e. 20 feet back from front property line). *ApPlicable side or rear yard setbacks apply to lot lines abutting fire lanes or alleys not exceeding 15 feet in width. Building Height: Maximum 2Y= stories or thirty-five'(35'i feet in height. Building Height is defined as "the vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof." LOTS OF RECORD - Special Provisions: ;orner Lots: lot width minimum side yard setback 40 - 50 feet 10 feet 51 - 80 feet 20 feet 8 l~feet or more 30 feet Side Yard Setback Requirements: ISide yard setba, cks for I~s of record shall be six (6) feet unless the structure or site does not contain a garage ~n wl~mh case, one side yard setback is required'to be ten (10) feet to accommodate a driveway access. HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS: Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. On existing lots of record*, impervious coverage may be permitted by a maximum of 40 percent providing that techniques are utilized as identified in Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1. Impervious cover is any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water or surface moisture, including all buildings, driveways and parking areas,' whether paved or not, tennis courts, sidewalks, patios and swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum opening between boards shall not be counted in impervious cover calculations. Rev, 3/97 -4789- R, lA' Zoning' District · ,. General ZO'~ing. (i?"'forrna tion DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS (GARAGESIS.HE~$) ,~Lbt Coveraqe and Setback Re quirement-~: An accessor~ buildln'g S~hall .be. eohsidered to be an integral ~'~J'rt of the prin,cipal S'tructure unless 'it is five (5) feet or more from the principal structure or use and providing that th~ strUCture exceeds 1 20 square feet. 1. Area and Size Requirements (see hardcover requirements on page 1): Accessory buildings shall' not excbed a total g~5ss floor area of 3,000 sqUare feet ,or 1 5 % of the total I'ot area whichever is less. Each individual accessory building shall not exceed 1,200 square feet of gross floor area. 'F'he total number of accessory buildings for lots measuring 10,000 square feet or less shall be two (2). On lots exceeding 10,000 square feet, accessory buildings shall be limited to a total, of three (3-). Front Yard Setback. All accessory buildings shall meet the same front yard setback requirements as the principal building, except for lakeshore and through lots. For detached gata.g, eS on a'lakeshore or throu§h lots, a minimum twenty (20) foot front yard setback'is' requiCed if the garage door(s) open to the street; an eight (8) foot front yard setback is required if the garage doOr(s) open to the side lot line. Side:Yard Setback. A~detached aCcessOry building may'be located:within four (4) feet of the side lot line in the rear yard with a minimum Of a six (6) foot Sbtback in side yard location. On through.and lakeshore lots, a,,detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of. the side Idt' line in the front yard. ~Vhenever a garage is designed Wi~h the doors fac.ing a side lot line, the minimum distance bet.ween the doors and the Side I°t iine shall be twenty (20) feet,, 4. Rear Setback. A detached accessory building may be. located' within four (4) feet of the ~ear lot line, Lakeshore Setback. Detached accessory buildings must maintain a 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water. DECKS: See separate deck handout for more information, Front and Sides .......................... Same as Accessory Building Setbacks Rear ....................................................... 10 feet ELEVATIONS Floor ~ie~ation Ordinary High Water Flood EI.e..vation ~' Lowest LAKE MINNETONKA 929.4 93'1 {C.l~l. ~ 9:33 931.5 (MCWD) - · DUTCH LA~'E' 939.2 940 9~2 LAKE LANGDON 932.1 .9?5 ....... 937~ Rev. 3/97 -4790- Mound City Code 330.05, Sub& 17 Subd. 17. Subdivider - Any person, conunencing proceedings under this ordinance to effect a subdivision of land for himself/herself or for others, Subd. 18. Subdivision - The separation of an area, parcel or tract of land into two or more parcels, tracts, lots Or long-term leasehold interests where the creation of the leasehold interests necessitate the creation of streets, roads or alleys for the residential, commercial, industrial or other use or any combination thereof, except those separations when a new street is involved, any division of a parcel of land. The term includes re- subdivision md, when appropriate to the eontext~ shall relate to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided or adjustment of boundary lines. 330.10 Procedural Requirements. Before dividing any tract of land into two or more lots or parcels, or adjusthg any boundaries not covered by M.S.A. 462.352-, Subd. 12, or the procedures set forth in Subsection 330.15 et seq. shall be followed. 330.12 Waiver of Platting. Any parcel of land, either platted or un-platted, that has been combined for tax purposes or for other reasons, cannot be re-separated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of this code. The City has many old subdivisions with 'small platted lots which standing alone do not meet current zoning requirements. Many of these lots have been combined for tax purposes and for various other reasons, i.e., to create a building site, to indicate a desire to combine to avoid or reduce special assessments for improvements, etc. A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City Council after receipt of background information provided by City staff. A request for waiver of the platting requirements shall be signed by the property owner on forms prepared for and approved by the City Council, which shall include a provision to reimburse the City for all of its costs. This request or application for a waiver shall be referred to citY Staff for review. The review by staff sh~U be conducted to determine if the division or release of the tax cambinati~"~nd th~ o,.oo~:.,. ,,F ',,~, propem/Identafieat~nn pare%ls for tax and building purposes is in e0rrlplianee with C~.g, C9~__~g md all planni, ng and zoning standards and objectives. The siaff shall prepare ~ritten findings and recommendations- for the Council's consideration. The waiver of platting and the release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be in complianee with all City codes. The Council may impbse-co~idiflons to the waiver and shall require the payment of any deferred or forgiven ~eeial assessments that have been avoided by a tax combination. - The waiver may be granted without public hearings or without referral to the Planning Commission. Nothing herein shall preclude the staff or Council from referring the matter to the Planning Commission if it is determined that their advise will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. 7/16/o0 -4791 - · Mound city Code. 330.15 If the application for a waiver of platting requests or requires any varianc6s from any' City Code r~luiremeat, the waiver application shall be processed in ~cordance with SUbsection 3.30.170 of tlg City Code and the request shall be referred to the Planning Commission and processed as any other variance request under this subdivision code. (ORD. 79-1996- 8-27-96) 330.15 General Procedure. Whenever any subdivision of land is proposed, before any coa~act is made for the sale of any part thereof and before any permit for the erection of a s~a'ucmre on such proposed subdivision shall be granted, the subdividing owner, or his authorized agent, shall apply for and secure approval from the City of Mound of such proposed subdivision in accordance with the following procedure which includes two steps for a minor subdi'vision and three steps for a major subdivision.. A. Minor Subdivision 1. Sketch plan 2. Final subdivision plat Major Subdivision 1. Sketch 'Plan 2. Preliminary plat 3. Final Subdivision plat 330.20 Classification of Subdivisions. Any division or land that is subject to these regulations shall be considered either a major subdivision or a minor subdivision. The cYassifioation shall be determined under the following criteria: Subd. 1. Minor Subdivisions. The followifig shall be considered minor subdivisions: A. . R~sidential.'--: Any subdivision of land creating not more than three residential lots. Such lots must conform to all of.the following: : 1. Have frontage on an existing public' road. 2. Not require the construction of. any new public facilities' Or public improvements. 3. ~here will be no adverse effect on remaining or adjoining property. 5 7/].6/00 -4792- October 18, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Street Reconstruction Program MFRA # 13276 Dear Mayor and Council Members: During the summer of 2001, the City engaged an Engineering student from the University of Minnesota, through their intern program, to inventory all the streets within the City. This was the first step in implementing a street reconstruction program. The next phase of the program will be to determine how to finance the improvements and what portion should be assessed to the homeowners and how much the City should pay. We have gathered information from nine western suburban cities on how they finance their street reconstruction programs. This data has been tabulated on the attached spreadsheet. It includes not only the percentage of the project assessed to the homeowners, but also some of the rates from the last couple of years. As you will note, the cost of these projects assessed to the property owners varies greatly from no assessment in Minnetonka to a high of 80 percent in Golden Valley. Most of the cities have established a rate that is adjusted each yehr based on the rate of inflation. The remaining cities use the assessment percentage and set the rate for each years project based on either preliminary cost estimates or final project costs. Most of the cities we contacted generally assess curb and gutter construction in the same manner. If a street is reconstructed and there is no existing concrete curb or it is a bituminous roll type curb, the cost of the new concrete curb and gutter is assessed directly to the benefiting property. On projects with existing concrete curb, where repairs and/or minor replacements are required, the costs are included in the overall project costs. All the cities we contacted use their respective utility funds to repair or replace watermain and sanitary sewer. Most cities that have a storm sewer utility, also use those funds for repairs and/or minor replacements. Most major storm water improvements projects, such as interceptors, detention ponds, etc., are assessed to the benefiting properties. -4793- Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council October 18, 2002 Page 2 The City of Mound has an existing street construction assessment policy that was adopted in 1976, a copy of which is attached. This policy was established for the total reconstruction of the existing gravel roads and does not adequately address the type of reconstruction projects we are now contemplating. We plan to have a draft copy of a revised assessment policy available for the council meeting on November 12, 2002. We will be suggesting that the City of Mound consider an assessment policy that will assess approximately two-thirds of the basic reconstruction costs to the benefiting property. On streets without concrete curb or only a bituminous curb, the total cost of new concrete curb and gutter would be assessed to the adjacent property. Some adjustments may be required on comer lots or lots with double frontage. We will also be suggesting that any storm sewer costs, over and above the normal casting replacement/adjustment or very minor repairs, should be paid from the Storm Sewer Utility Fund. We have roughly estimated the cost to reconstruct a typical Mound street that has bituminous curb and where the bituminous mat could be milled and still salvage the gravel base. New concrete curb and gutter would be installed, the gravel base strengthened and new bituminous paving applied. This rough estimate is very close to the numbers supplied by the surveyed cities. Using an average lot width of 60 feet and an assessment percentage of two-thirds, the assessable cost would be approximately $3,800 for the street reconstruction and $600 for the new curb and gutter, for a total of $4,400. The City share would be approximately $2,200. Please be advised that these are very rough numbers and would need to be adjusted accordingly when field data is available and more accurate estimates can be prepared. We have inserted our estimated unit charge and suggested assessment spread on the survey tabulation sheet to provide a comparison with the other communities surveyed. As previously mentioned, we will provide the City Council with a draft of the proposed assessment policy and a suggested 2003 project area for consideration at the November 12, 2002 meeting. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth Enclosures s:\main:\mou 13276kcorrespondence\mayor-citycouncil 10-I 6 -4794- CITY OF MOUND STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT POLICY In 1976, the City adopted a street improvement assessment policy under Resolution No. 76- 77. The assessment criteria is as follows: 30 percent of the total cost to be assessed based on front footage. Comer lots shall be calculated to include all front footage (front and sides). All lots shall be deemed to have at least a minimum of 40 front feet. b. 30 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on the square footage of the property to be assessed. c. 40 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on a unit basis. Since 1976, the City Council has added the following refinements to this policy. 1. Triangle Lots - lots that form a triangle on two streets are to be assessed for footage on the long side only. Multiple units other than duplexes are assessed on the basis of 3/4 unit per each residential unit in the building (Example: a 50 unit apartment is assessed for 37.5 units plus footage plus areas). 3. Lots that front on a County Road and a street improvement will be assessed on the same basis as other lots except that the units and square footage will be reduced by 50 percent. 4. Area of land formerly commons and now under private ownership, to be assessed as part of the private property. Large parcels (a number of combined lots) to be assessed one unit, plus area and footage. Two separate parcels under the same ownership will be assessed two units, plus area and footage if they both have enough area to qualify as buildable sites under the present zoning. 6. Single lots under separate ownership from adjacent property that do not meet the area requirements for a buildable site will be assessed only area and footage. 7. Properties abutting alleys that are bituminous surface only, with no curb and gutter, to be assessed the same as any other property except the front footage will be reduced by 50% with a minimum of 40 lineal feet. Properties which have the garage located across the street from the house will be assessed on the same basis as other lots except the parcel in which the garage is located will not receive a unit charge. -4795- 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Lots that front on a street to be improved and which previously paid a full assessment on another street improvement project will be assessed for the footage only with no minimum. Parcels which do not abut a street improvement project but received the benefits from the construction will be assessed for the project. Lots that are adjacent to a 12' wide bituminous street installed for City purposes which front another street in the project will not be assessed for footage on the side street. Triangular lots that are combined with a rectangular lot are to be assessed for footage on the long side of the triangular lot plus the footage of the remaining lot or lots. Duplexes are to be assessed on the basis of two units plus area and footage, with a minimum on the footage of 80 feet. Lots that have streets on three sides are to be assessed for footage on the long side and the average length of the other two sides. The cost of driveway entrances over 12 feet wide are assessed directly to the property owner. Commercial or industrial property get 1-1/2 units. Credit is given for past storm sewer assessments except that when credits exceed the assessment no assessment will be levied and no assessment paid. There is a maximum of 250 feet and 25,000 square feet per residential parcel. Storm sewers are assessed as part of the street improvements and these assessments are included in the unit, square footage and frontage charges. s:krnain:\mou 13276\Reports~streetimprovementassessmentpolicy -4796- z CD LI. ..-1 D r~ D 0 z L.U "' ~ o 0 uJ u_ L~ -- 0 "~ -4797- Page 1 of 5 Kandis M Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us> Friday, October 11,2002 3:00 PM Westonka.news Westonka.news Vol. 3, No. 5 October 11, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. Westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. **Please note: Westonka.news will not be published next Friday, October 18. Publication will resume on October 25. Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN 55364; http://www.westonka.kl2.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten~westonka.kl2.mn.us. Contents 1. News Briefs --10th Grade Reading Scores Strong --Fire Marshall Limits Artwork Hanging in Hallways --Legislative Candidate Forum Slated for October 21 2. Focus Topic: Writing Training for Teachers on Workshop Day, October 14 3. Upcoming Events 4. How Are We Doing? NEWS BRIEFS ** 10th Grade Reading Scores Strong** Westonka's results for the Grade 10 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment in Reading were strong across the board. 92% of Westonka tenth-graders performed at Level 3 or higher, out of a range of five achievement -4798- 10/11/02 Page 2 of 5 levels. 75% of the students performed in the two highest levels. In every area measured, Westonka students performed well above state averages. The Grade 10 Reading test is one of a series of tests whose goals are to enhance the educational accountability system in Minnesota. Students do not pass or fail the Grade 10 MCA, and the score has no impact on grade point average or eligibility for a diploma. Schools use the results to make future improvements in curriculum and instruction. **Fire Marshall Limits Artwork Hanging in Hallways** Think the hallways in your child's school are looking a little bare? There might be a health and safety reason for any wide open wall spaces. The state fire marshall visited Westonka Schools recently, and raised awareness regarding how much artwork can be displayed in school hallways. In order to comply with fire regulations, no more than 20% of hallway wall space may be covered with posters or artwork. In other health and safety news, an environmental assessment firm is checking indoor air quality in various spots throughout the buildings as part of the District's regular environmental management plan. **Legislative Candidate Forum Slated for October 21 ** Local legislative candidates, including those vying to represent citizens in the Westonka School District, will face off at a forum hosted by the Wayzata Public Schools on Monday, October 21, from 7-9 p.m. The forum will take place in the auditorium of Wayzata High School, 4955 Peony Lane (west ofi-494, north of Hwy 55). For more information, call the Wayzata Public Schools at 763.745.5068. FOCUS TOPIC **Writing Training for Teachers on Workshop Day, October 14'* On October 14, Westonka teachers will participate in a writing workshop. The teacher workshop will feature a specialist in an instructional model called "The Six Traits of Writing." The Six Traits of Writing model allows teachers and students to focus on one writing trait at a time, breaking the writing process into manageable parts. The result is improved writing performance for students across the curriculum, a more effective writing assessment for -4799- 10/11/02 Page 3 of 5 teachers, and a useful tool teachers can use to prepare students for state writing tests. "Ideas and Content," the first of the six traits, will be studied by Westonka teachers on Monday. Teachers will participate in a two-hour session with the presenter, followed by 90 minutes of small group work. The six traits are specific characteristics commonly found in successful student writing. In addition to Ideas and Content, the traits include Voice, Word Choice, Fluency, Organization, and Conventions. Districtwide, writing is an improvement goal for 2002-2003, as part of each school's regular accreditation review by the North Central Association. UPCOMING EVENTS --October 14-18, No School K-12. (Westonka Preschool in session on October 14 & 15 only). No ECFE classes this week. --October 14, Teacher Workshop morning; Gr. 1-12 Parent/Student/Teacher conferences, 4-8 p.m. --October 15, Gr. 1-12 Parent/Student/Teacher conferences --October 15, Community Education Advisory Council, 7 p.m., Shirley Hills Primary School --October 21, MW Parent Advisory, 4 p.m., Mound Westonka High School --October 21, MW Choir Boosters, 7 p.m. --October 21, Legislative Candidate Forum, 7 p.m., Wayzata High School --October 21, School Board Study Session, 7:30 p.m., Shirley Hills Primary School --October 22-24, SH Vision & Hearing Screening --October 22, MW Student Photo Retakes --October 22, SH PTA, 3:30 p.m. --October 23, SH Student Photo Retakes --October 24, SH Title I Family Night, 6 p.m. --October 25-26, Popsingers Hello Show, 7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High School --October 26, HT Octoberfest Fall Carnival, 11 a.m. --October 26, GMS Haunted Hall & Halloween Party, 7-9 p.m., $3 admission Home Athletic Events (for more sports schedules, go to www.mshsl.org/mshsl/schoolpage.asp?school=314) --October 14, Girls Volleyball vs. Bloomington Kennedy: Gr. 9 and JV, 5:30 p.m.; V, 7 p.m. Away Football Games (away games are reported for football because, for this year only, there is no home field to play on) -4800- 10/11/02 Page 4 of 5 --October 16, Varsity Football vs. Fridley, 7 p.m. BONDS AND LEVIES Levies are for Learning (paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries, utilities, and bus service) An operating levy was approved by voters in September 2002. Bonds are for Buildings (keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such as computers) A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001. HOW ARE WE DOING? We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. E-mail: welisten~westonka.k 12.mn.us District Feedback Line: 952.491.8260 Mail: Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonb~westonka.k 12.mn.us> It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 welisten~westonka.k 12.mn.us http ://www.we stonka.k 12. mn.us Westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is -4801 - 10/11/02 Page 5 of 5 public data. -4802- 10/11/02 -4803- -4804- -4805- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT Sept. 2002 75.00% GENERALFUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from Other Funds Charges to Other Departments Sept. 2002 YTD PERCENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED 2,253,520 0 1,037,965 (1,215,555) 46.06% 6,300 0 7,375 1,075 117.06% 188,450 15,758 182,779 (5,671) 96.99% 461,130 0 232,247 (228,883) 50.36% 137,550 6,645 81,657 (55,893) 59.37% 110,000 7,662 63,311 (46,689) 57.56% 145,400 5,304 128,680 (16,720) 88.50% 128,000 0 0 (128,000) 0.00% 13,000 3.596 12,516 (484) 96.28% TOTAL REVENUE 3.443.350 38.965 1.746.530 (1.696.820) 50.72% FIRE FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCK FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND RECYCLING FUND STORM WATER UTILITY 429,470 50,067 402,845 (26,625) 93.80% 6,050 1,600 4,285 (1,765) 70.83% 129,360 (137) 113,932 (15,428) 88.07% 535,500 76,243 432,195 (103,305) 80.71% 1,048,810 81,914 799,628 (249,182) 76.24% 2,050,000 146,028 1,412,441 (637,559) 68.90% 127,880 18,566 109,899 (17,981 ) 85.94% 112,000 13,175 83,402 (28,598) 74.47% 1011612002 rev01 Gino -4806- CiTY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT Sept. 2002 75.00% Sept. 2002 YTD PERCENT BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED GENERAL FUND Council 79,280 17,675 City Manager/Clerk 235,100 18,421 Elections 11,030 3,770 Finance 201,260 15,298 Assessing 79,700 17 Leg al 122,000 7,712 City Hall Building & Srvcs 89,110 5,776 Computer 28,250 1,557 Police 1,164,600 67,377 Emergency Prepardeness 6,780 0 Planning/Inspections 266,030 31,762 Streets 576,610 36,079 Parks 322,240 22,970 Transfers 207,840 17,320 Cable TV 48,000 20 Contingencies 60,860 778 69 325 171 O24 4 660 144 018 77 307 79 048 59 793 20 920 727 688 6 746 221. 101 370,229 234,834 155,880 22,716 689 9,955 87.44% 64,076 72.75% 6,370 42.25% 57,242 71.56% 2,393 97.00% 42,952 64.79% 29,317 67.10% 7,330 74.05% 436,912 62.48% 34 99.50% 44,929 83.11% 206,381 64.21% 87,406 72.88% 51,960 75.00% 25,284 47.33% 60,171 ~1.13% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3,498,690 246,532 2,365,978 1,132,712 67.62% Area Fire Service Fund 699,470 Cemetery Fund 9,920 Dock Fund 132,700 TIF 1-2 0 Water Fund 577,660 Sewer Fund 1,007,420 Liquor Fund 460,660 Recycling Fund 155,510 Storm Water Utility 58,200 24,350 407,606 291,864 58.27% 0 1,258 8,662 12.68% 4,200 41,320 91,380 31.14% 17,452 576,302 (576,302) 51,386 542,306 35,354 93.88% 58,567 738,934 268,486 73.35% 36,935 334,402 126,258 72.59% 10,348 92,198 63,312 59.29% 893 45,960 12,240 78.97% Exp-02 10/16/2002 Gino -4807- General Fund $866,096 CDBG 1,114 Area Fire Protection Services 276,034 Grant Revolving 0 Cemetery 437 Dock 200,202 PW Facility 105,282 G.O. Improvement Bonds (36,7S2) Commerce Place TIF (20,616) TIF 1-2 Notes 25,578 G.O. Bonds 2001 -A 4,263 G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 19,147 HRA Lease Rev Bonds 718,278 Capital Improvement 7,162,969 MSA 19,997 Sealcoat 1,259 CDB 2,097 Downtown TIF 1-2 (1,872,409) Water 1,264,253 Sewer 1,138,366 Liquor Store 1,177,211 Recycling 95,433 Storm Water 621,957 Fire Relief (67,105) HRA 319 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 10/16/2002 CashReportCouncil Gino -4808- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, September 25, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster READING OF MINUTES- 8/28/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. m WATER STRUCTURES A) Fredrick and Michelle Pacovsky, variance application from LMCD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted dock use area (Previously discussed at 6/26/02 & 8/28/02 Regular Board Meetings); B) Hendrickson/Windenburg and Finney, variance application from LMCD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted dock use area (Previously discussed at 8/28/02 Regular Board Meeting). C) Additional Business; LAKE USE & RECREATION A) Lt. Brian Johnson, Update on 2002 Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Activities; B) Discussion of LMCD Code Section 3.021 pertaining to Lake Minnetonka "High- Water" policy; C) Update of 9/6/02 Lake Minnetonka Wetlands Preservation Meeting; D) Additional Business; FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (8/16/02 - 8/31/02), (9/1/02 - 9/15/02), and (9/16/02 - 9/30/02); B) (*) August financial summary and balance sheet; -4809- C) Additional Business; 4. EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE A) (*) Minutes from the 9/13/02 EWM/Exotics Task ForCe Meeting (handout); B) Analysis of 2002 EWM Trucking Payments; C) Additional Business; 5. ADMINISTRATION 6. SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9, NEW BUSINESS 10.ADJOURNMENT -4810- DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, August 28, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McUillan, Orono; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orr Burma, Mound; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Sheldon Wed, Greenwood. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Victoria has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMEMTS, Chair Foster There were no Chair announcements. READING OF MINUTES. 7/24/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 8/14/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Babcock moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the minutes from the 7/24/02 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. Babcock stated that he believed the word "undefined" in the ninth paragraph on page t3 should be deleted and the word "underlined" should be inserted. He recommended this as a friendly amendment, Skramstad agreed to this. VOTE: Ayes (8), Abstained (2; Burma and Wed); motion carried. Seuntjens arrived at 7:02 p.m. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Ambrose seconded to approve the minutes from the 8/14/02 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. · Wert stated that he was not at this meeting and that he would like to comment and refute some of the BOard discussion from the 8/14/02 Regular Board Meeting pertaining to the Lake Uinnetonka Wetlands Task Force. Foster stated that this would be taken up later under agenda item 2A. VOTE: Ayes (6), Abstained (5; Babcock, Foster, Nelson, Seuntjens, and Wed); motion carded. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda. There were no comments from persons in attendance on subjects not on the agenda. -4811 - Lake Minnetonka.Conservation District Regular Board'Meeting August 28, 2002 PUBLIC HEARING Page 2 Hendrickson/Windenburg and Finn·y, variance application from LMCD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted doCk use area: lA, Fredrick and Michelle Pacovsky, variance application from LMCD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted dock use area variance (Public Hearing conducted at 6/26/02 Regular Board Meeting). Foster called the public hearing to order at 7:05 p.m. and asked staff for background on the proposed applicatiOn. Nybeck made the following comments: · The staff memo prepared for the public hearing also Pertains to agenda item lA, the pending PacovskY vadance application. DUring the public hearing: and considerationl it would make sense to consider bOth proposed Vadance appliCatiOnS at the Same time. · · Shidey Henddckson and RickWindenburg, 3200 NOrth Shore Ddve, and Mark FinneY, 3210 North Shore Ddve, have submitted a joint vadance application for consideration on Maxwell Bay in the City of Orono. The application has been submitted for variance from LMcD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted dock use area. Physical hardships of converging lot lines and sh, all water have been identified, with a public hearing notice published in the 8/13/02 edition of the Lakeshore Weekly News. · At its 6/26/02 Regular Meeting, the Board conducted a public hearing and considered a vadance application from Fredrick and Uichelle Pacovsky, 3186 North Shore Ddve. The applicants at this meeting proposed two site plans, with concerns raised BY the abutting Property owners. The Board took no action at this meeting and staff was directed to facilitate a meeting with~the apPlicant and the affected property owners to investigate whether a revised site plan could be agreed to by all parties, documented by an updated survey, and brought' back fOr revieW by the Board at a futui~e Regular Meeting. · Staff facilitated a neighborhood meeting to discuss the docking situation in the area on July 11th. In addition to Nybeck, Board members Babcock ~nd McUil an were n attendance atth S meeting Also in attendance wet~Fred an:~ Michell~ pac~vsky Shi~iY Hend'ilCkS.;on and Rick windenburg, Rich Anderson, Paul BlOrnberg:I anti~ Mi~::~allaCe B,~se~ on'"{hb~i~%ssions at this meeting and sLibSequent discussiOns amongst these property owners a revised survey has b~n proposed for the Paco~sky variance application and the joint vadance application submit~b~' ~°r ~e H~nd~sor{/Windenburg and ~inney sites. Foster stated that this area of Maxwell Bay has a characteristic of shallow water and the proposed docks are"i0nger than what is allowed by LMCD Code. Nybeck continued his comments: · At the Pacovsky site~ a 90' long straight dock (no canopy)has been proposed, from the 27'.of conti~uous 9291~~ ~VD ~Qii.he.,'f0,r t~.Sioii~e.i~f a 26i i°~g ~!oCi~ and a jet skil The aPPliCant has p~pose~ilt° adjust the eastern extend~ side site line sightly over 17 degrees to the east and to a~ijUst the western extended side site line slightly over six degrees to the west fg[ this dock, No side setba(!k.vadances are proposed from the adjusted side site line extensions. · At the Henddckson/Windenbu.!:g site, a 1~0' long "H" dock,{no canopy) hasbeen proposed from the 64,. of continuous 929.4' NGVD shOreline, for the storage of a 26' long dock and a 16' long boat. A six foot side setback is proposed from the eastern adjusted side site~:lipe extension and 15' from the western side site. line extension. No boats are proposed to be stored on the east side of the dock. At the Finney site, a 100, long dock (with canopy) has been. proposed from the 58' of continuous 929.4 NGVD shoreline, for the storage of a 22' long pontoon and a 19' long boat in front of it. The proposed -4812- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page. 3 canopy and dock structure would comply with Code for side setback requirements for both the dock and the canopy. · Two Code Sections apply to the proposed variance applications. First, Code Section 2.O1, subd. 1 requires that docking and watercraft storage be contained within the authorized dock use area for these sites. He reviewed the Code requirements for these sites, noting that none of them were fully contained within their authorized dock use areas. Second, Code Section 1,07 allows the Board to consider applications for variance from Code, provided the application of the Code causes the applicant a practical diffiCulty or a phYsical hardship. A dock length, side setback, and adjusted dock use area variance is required for the Pacovsky site. The proposed adjusted dock use area variance has been supported by the HendrickSon/Windenburg site; however, there has not been direct communication from the abutting neighbor to the east, Paul Blomberg. A dock length and side setback variance is required at the Hendrickson/Windenburg site. A dock length variance is required at the Finney site. · The City of Orono and MN DNR were provided a copy of both variance applications. The City of Orono stated that they recommended approval of the proposed variance applications, provided the neighbors can agree on an alternative site plan. No feedback had been received from the MN DNR. · In considering the proposed variance applications, the Board should take into consideration the written comments from Mr. Blomberg. If the Board is comfortable with the proposed variance applications as submitted, staff believes that the Board could direct LeFevere to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the applications as submitted. He recommended those Findings of Fact and Order should be prepared for each site individually. · He entertained comments or questions from the Board. Wert asked if each of these sites had a pdmary residence. Nybeck stated that each site had a primary residence. Foster asked for comments from the public on the proposed applications. Mr. Paul Blomberg, 3180 North Shore.Drive, stated that he was the abutting property owner to the east of the Pacovsky site.. He reviewed comments he e-mailed to the District on 8/3/02 and 8/4/02, noting that he had some concern about the proposed variance applications foF.the three abutting sites tohis west; At the Pacovsky site, he was not opposed to the proposed dock; however, he would prefer that the boat be stored on the west side of the dock:.r.a, ther th~n the east, He reviewed Code.~rta!ning to the authorized.dock :use area.for hiS site~ noting that he believ~ it, woUld be within, his authorized dock ~use area ifa boat were.stored on the eastside.· He believed :that there were aitemative dock arrangements that would allowthe three%ighbors to achieve what they desire, Which he ~tat~d that he,would supporL He expressed support that his authorized dock use area woUld take the brunt of the:adios!ed lot lines needed for the proposed variance applicat OhS. He asked the Board iHhey had any questions for him. Skramstad asked Blomberg f the dock with four slips in the 813102 e-mail was hyPothetica. Blomberg stated that this dock was hypothetical; however, he would be allowed to install it based on his review of the Code w thout a need for a vadance He added that insta ling the dock as proposed in the hypothetical woulc not work with the proposed vadance application for the Pacovsky site. Foster stated that the District has established the jurisdiction in the past to adjust extended side site lines when concave conditions exist, noting that it sometimes involves the adjustment of several properties. -4813- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page 4 Knudsen asked Blomberg if moving the hypothetical four-slip dock in front of his site to the east would cause him a hardship. Blomberg stated that the 27' of shoreline at the Pacovsky deafly does not have an authorized dock use area if the side site lines are extended into the lake the same direction they are platted on land. At the neighborhood meeting, he proposed a compromise for the Pacovsky site that would allow for a 17' wide adjusted dock use area with five foot side setbacks from the adjusted side Site lines. This compromise would involve bisecting both of the Pacovsky side site lines; however, it was not well received by the neighbors in the immediate area. He stated he supported the Board granting a vadance for access pUrposes for the Pacovsky site; however, he had concern about the Hendrickson/Windenburgsite being granted a 100' long dock length vadance at the expense of his authorized dock use area. Wert stated that in concave shoreline situations, which appears to the case in this area, the Distdct has in the past adjusted dock use areas of abutting property owners. He believed that it could be possible for Blomberg to move his proposed hypothetical dock to the east within his authorized dock use area to the east, yet protect his riparian rights. Foster stated that if the authorized dock use area is adjusted for the Pacovsky site and it impacts the Blomberg authorized dock use area, it would be the responsibility of both the owners and the interested party purchasing the Pacovsky residence to communicate this in the future. One option for the Board to consider would be to include any variance order approved by the District as part of the deed for the property. The area in question is public water and is not owned by the sites that abut the lake, and are subject to reasonable regulations. Babcock stated that Mr. Blomberg's comments regarding his authorized dock use area were based on stdct application of Code. He questioned whether it is the responsibility of a property owner that has recently purchased a property with parallel side site lines to look down the shoreline and determine whether it could be impacted in the future by a variance request by a nearby property. He believed that the primary issue is whether the proposed adjusted dock use area request for the Pacovsky site should be adjusted more with the abutting property owner to the west, the Hendrickson/Windenburg site, noting that there would be a need for some give and take. Foster stated that if the Board required the Pacovsky's to store the 26' long boat on the west side of the dock rather than the east, it probably would include the moving of the Henddckson/Windenburg dock also to the west. LeFevere stated that the proposed adjusted dock use area for the Pacovsky site would include adjusting the eastem extended side site line slightly over 17 degrees to the east towards the Blomberg site and the western extended side site line slightly over six degrees to the west towards the Hendrickson/Windenburg site. Side setbacks are not proposed from either adjusted side site line extension and two watercraft have been proposed on the Blomberg side of the dock. A six foot side setback has been proposed from the east edge of the Hendrickson/Windenburg dock to the adjusted eastem Pacovsky side site line extension. It might make sense for the Board to consider some form of a side setback variance for the Blomberg site on the east side of his dock use area. He believed that there would need to be probably a full side setback from the eastern adjusted extended side site line to provide maneuvering space for the front watercraft stored on the east side of the Pacovsky dock. Foster stated that he believed there were a number of issues regarding the proposed vadance applications that would not be resolved at this meeting. He suggested moving the discussion along with the public to get their input before the public headng was closed. Mr. Fred Pacovsky, 3186 North Shore Drive, stated that he and his wife submitted the original variance application being considered by the Board. There have been discussions with the affected neighbors and staff to amend the -4814- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page 5 original proposed site plan to make it work. He believed that the proposed site plan addressed the neighborhood concern; however, they would be open to consider other changes. He urged the Board to make a decision in the near future because he believed that the process had been drawn out. Ms. Shirley Hendrickson, 3200 North Shore Drive, clarified that she had met with Paul Blomberg on August 11th to discusS the proposed site.plan. She expressed concern about making further adjustments towards her property because she has a limited amount of shoreline and the location of the North Shore Marina dock causes them problems. She believed that the proposed site plan was reasonable and that both property owners abutting the Pacovsky site needed to give something. Mr. Mike Wallace, 3160 North Shore Drive, stated that he currently shares a dock with the Blomberg's. He expressed concern that the proposed site plan would have a gmat impact on the Blomberg site because the proPOSed jet ski does not include proper maneuvering space, He believed that there was enough space to move the structures slightly to the west and that would allow for joint maneuvering areas that would make all parties involved happy. Mr. Rick Windenburg, 3200 North Sho're Drive, stated that if the Board had concerns about maneuvering space for the proposed jet ski at the Pacovsky dock, it could be moved to the west side of the dock where a 6' side setback has been proposed from the adjusted side site line. Babcock stated that if that were the case, it would require a greater adjustment of the western side site line. There being no fUrther comments, the public headng was closed at 7:55 p.m. MCMillan complimented the neighborhood for the cOmpromises that had taken place to accommodate the docking needs for the Pacovsky site. She questioned whether the request made by the Pacovskys for two watemraft is reasonable. She suggested that it might be appropriate to liT tthe number and size of watercraft at this site. BabcoCk echoed the comments of McMillan and ~mp'l Tented the efforts of the neighborhood He believed that the prbP°sed dbCk was:' ei tiveiy cloSe; hoWever, th:~re ire'f°Ur Points for the BOard to consider if the appliCat ons are sent back to Staff for furt~eii~Ork. Theyinbi~d&?'i)i limiting t~e number and size of watercraft at the Pac°VSky dock, posSibly to 24''length With :i&ss beam width, 2)~e ~g:i&S ~ie: §kewed slightly to the south and:Should be equaled out, 3)there migh{ b~ a Po§~ibiiit~ {o graht&d a ~h~r ~oCk i~ng~"~a~ance at the ~endricksOn/WindenbUr~ site to accommodate for the Pacovsky s te with further adjustments to the west, and 4) any reduction in the dock use area fortheBibmberg Site c°bid :be'adjbste~e S:e~here i~ th'eth&i:r au~oriZeCi dbCA ~.se area, FoSter ~tated that he wOuid SupPort redUCing the proPOsed adjustment of the eastern extended side site line The BOard directed Staff to get the applicants and the affeCted Property owners together to resolve the issues addressed by the' Boai'd. The meeting was recessed at 8:03 p.m. and re-convened at 8:07 p.m. 1. WATER STRUCTURES B. Additional'BUsiness There was no additional bUsiness. -4815- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting AugUst 28, 2002 2. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Page6 Ordinance Amendment, Discussion of an ordinance Prohibiting the use of motorized watemraft on certain parts of Lake Minnetonka, amending Section 3.022. FoSter stated that he was unable to attend the 8/14/02 Board meeting when this ordinance amendment was discussed in detail. He asked Wert for his comments on the diScussion at this meeting. Weft commented on the work of the Lake Minnetonka Wetlands Task Force, noting that there was a Iot0f information collected and discussed at a number of meetings. There Were a number of' aitematives brought forward to the Board, recalling the Board meeting in May when a straw poll vote on vadous options was taken. Foster exPreSsed COncem about moving the point of demarcation from the mouth of Six Mile Creek upstream as proposed in the ordinance amendment. He believed that the elec~dc mOtOr limitation in the ordinance currently approved WOUld solve the Vast majority of the concerns of the Board and would not preclude property owners from enjoying the riparian rights they are entitled to by having properties that abut Six Mile Creek. He supported the ordinance already approved by the Board~ noting that the City of Uinnetrista could adopt a more restrictive ordinance than the one approved by the District. Babcock stated that there have been examples in the past when the Dist~ct has set baseline standards and member cities have adopted more restrictive ordinances than these standards Suerth stated that the Board has spent a lot of time considering an ordinance that would balance the environmental concerns with the riParian rights of owners that have 'properties that abut the creeks referenced in the ordinance amendment. He noted that ordinance adopted addresses other creeks in addition to Six Mile Creek and that h'e Would like to move on. Knudsen stated that when the straw poii vOted was taken by ~he' Board this past May, he understood that more than one draft ordinance amendment would come back to the Board for consideration, ~hen one ordinance ame~dmeht came'back tOth:e B~aid in: junel 'he ~a~ ~%g~-[i~ff ~id" When'it d d ~ttake into cbnsiderat 0n the request fr°m~ the City of Min~etflsta'~o Prote~[ ~e. ~h:iSt~i.~i~:ght~ ~ot:~e fOUr pro~ Ow~brs'on Six Mile Creek. H ~'~tated' that he di~ not rec~li the BO~d r&~i~'~'e~e~ t~ti~bnY that .proPeller abtjPn from' an elec~C motor Wbuld have i%~ imPaCt 0n::thb e.d~ir~n~ent an:a.:~jj~'j'~{~.~:~ pro~iie~r a~,{i0h.{~~ .a~as mo.tor. McMiilan Stated t~at'she was the Boa~ membe~ ~6 ~ade~e ~'o{i=&n fbr~eF&v~e to~d~aff the °rd nan amendment being diSC~s~d b~ th'eB~td~;' Sh6 ex~:~e~s~~ ~ce~. ~bout ~e~{~icting {h~ ~pe of moto~ use. in the creek, and would favor eliminating areas of the cree~s, tb~t b~ye historical use ~mm the adopt~ o~inanm She belieVbd that ~e p~ma~'eh~jrOn.~en:~al advan~ag&:~f~'~16b(~ib~' ~to~ Compared togas mo~0~ is th'at ~ db not have gas fumes. She ~lieved the ~pe of dock st~ctu~e, whether there is removal o~:v~e~tion, ~nd whether a dred~ is ~eqUir~d'at~:"6~ e~viron~h~tai~hce~'~.t~a~ ~'~uid~e ~n~sidered'bY ~ 9~a~', She StateS,at she would not suppo~ grandfatheHng because she ~lieved that is not g~d ~licy on~ ~UbiiC watem~ Nelson stated that he did not support the draft Ordinance arnend~ent. He expressed sUPpOrt of the ordinance adopted because there was a significant amount of work done by the Task Force, it greatly improves.the. situation, and it was a compromise to preserve the dparian dghts of property owners ~n these'ti:ibuia~, He questioned the logic of moving the point of demarcations upstream on both Six Mile and Long Lake ~fbeks as proposed in the draft ordinance amendment. If the City of Minnetdsta has a desire to restdct motorized watercraft upstream from a certain point of Six Mile Creek, he believed that they could adopt an ordinance amendment that was more restrictive than the one adopted by the Board. -4816- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page 7 Babcock stated that when the Board took the straw poll vote in May, there were a number of posSible amendments to the matrix prepared by LeFevere and Wert. He recalled that there was signifi(~ant discussion on possible amendments, with only a couple of amendments proposed by Board members that were voted on that evening, If a Board member believed that amendment they wanted was not considered in the adopted ordinance, they could propose it at a later date. He stated that he did not support the proposed ordinance amendment because he believed eliminating power boat traffic in the proposed creeks is good for the lake on a long-term basis. His long-term goal for the Board is to take incremental steps to protect the upstream areas of the lake by reducing external loading of phosphorous from these tributaries. The characteristic of the wetland area of Painter's Creek has changed significantly over the years with development and he questioned whether it makes sense to restore it to its pdstine state. He believed it makes sense for Six Mile and Long Lake Creeks and he supported the ordinance adopted by the Board, noting that he believed there is other work for the Task Force to deal with pertaining to other wetland areas on Lake Minnetonka. In the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, it calls for public bodies such as. the Distdct to acquire easements over wetland areas to provide protection beyond what can be provided through legislation. He suggested that the Board might want to consider this as an option to limit boat storage in these wetland areas, noting that he already had preliminary discussions with the four property owners on Six Mile Creek that have claimed historical use. Skramstad stated that he would suPport protecting the historical riparian dghts of property owners that abut the tributaries referenced in the adopted ordinance, whether it be through grandfathedng or adjusting the points of demarcation. Ambrose stated that the easement idea suggested by Babcock was intriguing and medted further eXploration. He supported protecting the environmental aspect of the lake and protecting the interests of the property owners that have historical use of these tributaries, preferably in the form of the ordinance amendment as proposed. McMillan stated that she understood that boat traffic on Six Mile and Long Lake Creeks was currently pretty limited and that the ordinance adopted would make them more accessible for boat Storage. She believed that this provides a false sense of accessibility. Babcock stated that he had concerns about removing restrictions of all types from certain areas of both Long Lake and Painter's Creeks, including the remora! of language that would allow for electric motors. McMillan stated that there are bays of Lake Uinnetonka that are shallow that have not cUrrently been addressed. Foster asked McMillan if there was a distinction between bays that do not have flowing water versus tributaries that have flowing water, McMillan stated that flowing water makes a difference; however, she did not have a scientific answer to it. Wert stated that the Board directed the Task Force to bifurcate the study of the tributaries from the wetland areas of. the overall lake. He be eved that cons deration of other wetland areas on the lake will be forthcoming and that the ordnance adopted was only the first step, Babcock questioned whether there is an absolute right to store and dock a motorized watercraft on a body of water based on the State of Minnesota's definition of access, citing the electdc motor restrictions On Lake Harder and Lake Calhoun in Minneapolis as an example He stated that he believed the crux of the problem is the economic issues for a few property owners that need to be addressed. He questioned whether this supports the -4817- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page 8 concept of eliminating the ordinance that has already been adopted by the Boardl The MCWD has spent a large · amount of money restoring wetlands near Lake Hardet and he believed that could be prevented in the upper watershed district by establishing the correct mechanisms. Nelson stated that he would be supportive of continued discussions with property owners who can document historical usage, possibly through a conservation easement, as long as it limits the number of boats be stored. McMillan stated that in the draft ordinance amendment pertaining to Six Mile Creek, there was not language that described the area upstream of the fish traps from the Ralph Hatch residence. LeFevere stated that he was awaiting the legal description of this location from the legal counsel for the four property owners. Babcock stated that he would prefer the Board not take action on the proposed ordinance amendment for a variety of reasons. MOTION: Babcock moved, Nelson seconded to table discussion on the draft ordinance amendment to a future Board meeting. Mr. Chris Dietzen, legal counsel for the four property owners on Six Mile Creek, stated that he would like to be heard before there was a vote on the motion. Foster denied the request from Dietzen because Robert's Rule of Order does nOt allow for discussion on motion to table. Dietzen stated that the Board had incomplete information that was not included in the Board packet. Babcock clarified that his motion was to table action on the draft ordinance amendment to a future Board meeting rather than table discussion of it at this meeting. Foster asked LeFevere for interpretation of the motion. LeFevere stated that he believed the motion was out of order because there was no motion on the floor to table. It appeared that the intent of the motion made was to decide how to limit discussion of the proposed ordinance amendment, noting that this could possibly be achieved through another motion. Babcock stated that his intent would be to allow for discussion of the proposed ordinance amendment at this meeting; however, not take formal action on it at this meeting. Foster ruled the motion out of order. Dietzen stated that correspondence was previously submitted that stated the ordinance adopted by the Board applied to his clients was unlawful, improper, unconstitutional, and a taking of ripadan rights. An invitation was previously made to investigate whether something could be done to resolve these issues. A verbal proposal has been made that would include either moving the point of demarcation upstream from his clients or possibly grandfathering. Draft ordinance amendments have been prepared that would either move the point of demarcation or grandfather his clients based on the discussion at the previous Board meeting. His clients have agreed to the following relating to these ordinance amendments: 1) that grandfather rights would not extend to -4818- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regu%ar Board Nleeting August 28, 2002 Page 9 guests or invitees of the property owner, 2) to limit the number of docks to four which would be one for each of his clients, 3) to release their property rights for multiple docks to four to resolve the dispute, and 4) to limit to the. current version of Code Section 2.02 of the LMCD Ordinance which limits the number of watercraft that may be stored at a dock structure. LeFevere asked Dietzen whom he was negotiating with. Dietzen stated that he was responding to comments from individual Board members, noting that his clients had a separate meeting with: Babcock relating to potential easements. His clients would agree to execute a Settlement Agreement and a Restrictive Covenant under either of the ordinance amendments. If a conserVation easement is more acceptable to the Board, his clients are acceptable to consider it. He did not recommend that any portion of the ordinance adopted be changed, with the eXception that subd. 4 should be added that would provide language for pre-existing rights for his clients. His clients would like the same dghts that other property owners enjoy; however, his clients were willing to discuss this. He stated that he Was unaware of any scientific study presented to the Board that substantiates the difference of extemal loading of phOSphorous for an electdc motor versus a gas motor. If the Board decides not to take action on an amendment that would address his clients concerns, he requested that they have an opportunity to meet with representatives of the Board to further address this issue. Mr. Adrian Herbst, The Bailer Herbst Law Group, stated that he represented Robert and Janice Halverson who are longstanding property owners on Six Mile Creek. His clients have 111 acres of property with 1,400' of shoreline. He stated that he was not present to oppose any action the Board might take to address the fOur property owners on Six Mile Creek. However, his clients would Object to an ordinance that would entirely prohibit the use of a motorized watercraft, noting that the current ordinance would allOW for watercraft with electric motors. He commented on the concept of conservation easements and their applicability to his clients property. Amborse asked Herbst .if his clients had historical use of Six Mile Creek in the past. Herbst stated that his clients have accessed Six Mile Creek in the past with both motorized and non-mOtorized watercraft, although they do not have a dock currently installed. Minnetrista Mayor Cheryl Fischer stated that she was at {he previous Board meeting and thatshe would like to see the District ordinances mirror the ordinances that may be adopted by the Uinnetrista City CoUncil. She stated that she understood the Board had spend a significant amount of time studying these issues; however, there are a numberof conflicting parties interested in Six Mile Creek. Foster asked Mayor Fischer to have the City of Minnetrista staff forward agenda's, minutes, and packet information to keep the Distdct informed on city council discussions. Mr. Dan Kelly, legal counsel for Upland Farms, commented on the draft ordinance amendment being disCussed by the Board. The ordinance adopted was discussed for a number of months with a lot of thoughts discussed, adding it was a compromise. It takes into consideration environmental and property fights concems, noting that he believed moving the point of demarcation was not consistent with previous policy discussions. He believed that the balance of environmental and property dghts would be a problem with the proposed ordinanc~: amendment because non-motorized watercraft would be prohibited upstream from the new point of demarcation. He recommended that the Board not consider the proposed ordinance amendment. Mr. Greg Smith, 4000 Gamefarm Road~ stated that he had recently met with Babcock to discuss the concept of conservation easements; He believed that the proposal to limit the number of(locks to four was a valuable -4819- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 21)02 Page 10 concession on their part. Additionally, he and his neighbors would be agreeable to the limit the size of the watemraft and would abide by the ordinance upstream from their p.roperties. He stated that he would like to see further discussion pertaihing to the possibility of the concept of conservation easements-. Foster stated that he believed the four property owners in question have historically had one watercraft. He expressed concem that the four docks proposed could have up to four watercraft at each dock, which would result in 16 watercraft. Smith stated that he would be agreeable to further discussion about the number of watercraft that would be stored at the four proposed docks. Babcock stated that when he met with Smith and his neighbors to discuss the concept of conservation easements, he represented that the discussions were with a Board member rather than as representative of the Board, The intent of the meeting was listen to their concerns and see if there were different solutions that could be brought back to entire Board for discussion purposes. He expressed concern about future subdivisions and he believed that conservation easements might be one approach to deal with them relating to boat storage in these areas. Ambrose stated that the proposal offered by Dietezen was substantial and a good place to begin discussions. Mr. Jim Blakeway stated that he was in attendance to speak on behalf of most residents on Halsteads Bay. There is some sentiment of the Halsteads Bay Wetlands Preservation Group in favor of continued historical use of property owners on Six Mile Creek. However; there is no sentiment to allow for further usage of Six Mile Creek, whether it is electric or gas motors, beyond these four property owners. Foster summarized what he.believed were the discussions of the Board and the public at this meeting. He believed that it would be appropriate for a sub-committee, chaired by Babcock, to work on the possibility of conservation easements and other details. He recommended that he and Wert should also participate in this meeting, noting that any other Board members would also be welcomed to attend these discussions. LeFevere provided an overview of Open Meeting laws, noting that any meeting scheduled would be subject to Open Meeting lawS. The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to schedule a meeting in the near future to further discuss the concept of conservation easements. The meeting was recessed at 9:33 p.m. and re,convened at 9:35 p.,m, B, Additional Business, There was no additional business. 3. FINANCIAL A. July financial summary and balance sheet. Skramstad stated that the monthly financial summary and balance sheet is generally on the consent agenda; however, he requested that. it not be a consent agenda at this meeting because of the new format implemented in 2002 that compares planned revenues and expenditures versus actual revenues and expenditures for all three -4820- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page budgets. He provided a detailed overview of the July financial summary and balance sheet and a budget vadance report that he had prepared. The Board accepted the July financial summary and balance sheet as submitted and complimented the efforts of Skramstad. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 4. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE Suerth provided a brief update on the 2002 EWM Harvesting Program and the public access inspections being conducted in association with the "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Uinnetonka" project. Nybeck stated that final reports for these projects would be prepared in the near future and brought forward to the Board for review and comments. Suerth stated that he would check with Dick Osgood on availability of Lake Minnetonka Association funds to assist the District in the 2002 program. Foster stated that he had recently attended two local Rotary Club meetings and that he believed there is a base of volunteers who are interested in a project to help the lake. He believed that one potential project for these volunteers could be to assist in the public access inspections in conjunction with the zebra mussel program. 5. ADMINISTRATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVE THE LAKE McMilian stated that the summer solicitation letter was recently sent out and that donations are currently being received. 7, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck stated that a copy of the 8/20/02 Lakeshore Weekly News article and 8~23~02 New Release pertaining to the "High-Water Declaration" on Lake Uinnetonka were included in the handout folders for informational purposes. He summarized recent lake level readings, noting that it was 930.28' on 8/23/02, 930.32' on 8/26/02, and 930.28' on 930.28L He reported that the discharge during these days was 300 c.f.s. The Board discussed the current policy pertaining "High-Water" on Lake Minnetonka. Some of the discussion items included: · How active the Sheriff's Water Patrol was enforcing it and the need for an update from them on this, · The difficulty of educating the public of the 600' minimum-wake requirement dudng a "High-Water Declaration". · The possible need to update the policy to establish a minimum-wake requirement for the entire lake during similar circumstances in the future, -4821 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page12 · Whether the District should affect the uSe pattern of a couple thousand of boats dudng periods that are a fact of nature when dock can be raised and shoreline can be further protected. · A number of the complaints received from the public have been from properties built in the floodplain for Lake Minnetonka. · The need to improve communications with the public on the "High-Water Declaration". · There is a need to find a balance of the rights of the dpadan owners on Lake Uinnetonka with the general public. Nybeck stated that an update from the Sheriff's Water Patrol on their activities was tentatively scheduled for a Board meeting in September. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:08 p,m, Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -4822- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 Minnetonka' BN, d Deephav%., MN "~539~1 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER. Gregory S. Nybeck October 7, 2002 Lake '~,innetonka Lake Levels: ~Lake levels on La~e"~innetbhka reached historic ieves n 2702 w th a Pea'k of 930~52 NGVD °n Satdi-a~ry; 9/7/02'-: This broke theprev[0Us histodc hlgh iake ievel of"930.51 NG VD that OCCurred in 195:i; Two "Hi~l~ watei- Dediai:ations'' Were'made ih 20021 ~'The firgt ,High water Dediaratioi¢ was madebn 7/16/02 and term nated '~n 7/23/02. The ~ecOnd "HighWater'Declarat °n" Was made on 8/23/02 and terminated on 1013ii~2. ~ ' .... : ....... Section 3.021 ?quires the Executive D rector to NGVD'fora Pedo~ of~ighi consecutive' 'd~ys,~ or "~ igH~Wa[er Deoiai'a~ie'~:';,,' iake,i6V~lS rieed.t~ :fa' Waier DeClaration"' Lake M'ir~ LMCD Cod~ Section 3.021 details the policy whena "H~gh. ........ Water Dec arabon'"~s'':made' ¢:'on ..... Lake M~nnetonka. ...... Code this declaration when 930.0' m 'Wake on number Bay,' Tanager Lake, ,ns Bay, and JCnnings Bay. A M nimum Wake is required for the remainder of Lake MinnetOnka within a distance of 600' from the shoreline,'"'A Minirfium Wake mea~s the Wake moving ou(.fromla watercraft, and tr~ iin~ beli' hd in'a ': ' Widening "V" is of insuffidienf~ size to ~ffec[ othe~ W~tercraff'or to be detrimental to the Shorelinei(% more than 5 MPJH,). LMCD office:, Lake Minnetonka Water Patrol Project: :For.'th'e sebbiid c~nsecu:tive year, thei-e~w~9 in¢iceagbti~water:i~at~i' prbse.nce'in 2002 on Lake Minnetonka by adding tWo ft}iktime~'Hennep n C~u~ She~ffs Offi~Watbr'Pa[r° dePuiieSf°r five months ir~ mid Mayr tier°agh r~ d OctObei:' S mi ar io 2001,'.iudding ofthis Ptegra~'was Shared by ennePin County (50%),. LMCD Member-cities (30%), and .the LMCD '!Save the Lake" Fund (20%),. Any shortfalls in unding froni t~e member cities in 2002 will be offset by funds receiVed in 2001 from a number of Lake Minnetonka area buSineSSbs The'P~dgram in 2002 was a sucCe's~ .~imiiar ~o 2001,' and plan§itc continue the prOgram in 2003 are on-going The LMOD is currently pursuing a lOng-term funding commitment f¢bm Hennep n County for 2003 and beyond. E~ke Minnetonka SOlat'Li, ht p,r(~iect: n March, the LMCD' B0a~d au[hOrized the purchase ~f S¢l~r.l!g"~ts With "8:a~/elhe ~ake' "fUhd~'tO'be'id~t~ b~dn't6p ici e×isi ng red'and iCreen na~ig~i.oriai iBuOys for tl~b 2O(~2'sbas¢ as a ~i'i'~t P:~je¢[i'~: ~hii~e' ~rea~ bfLa~-M nhet%~a:.w~:~:'ChOS~ i~ ~:~ d pat~:~i~i:ilh, e'~2 i~ 0ti~fbJ~.~t:!t~ :te~t i[i.'~ii- ~ffei2ii~n~§s of ~iese I g:iits'~:;' They, i'nClUded?i)'~b %anne s j~'S( east :of.~he Ar~ia 8i: d~e', 2)[he channe ~n the southeast Side of SP~aY island''on. the Upper L~ke; ':and 3) both ends of the Nafr0Ws and ~;r~01a, Bridge Channels. The solar lights Were installed in these areas in late May and were just recently removed. Feedback received from the public on this pilot project was encouraging and continuation of the project in 2003 s likely, with the pOSsibility that the.areas of Lake Minnetonka included in this project could be expanded -4823- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER, 10/7/02, PAGE 2 2002 EWM Harvesting Program: The 2002 EWM harvesting season commenced on 6/12/02 and continued through 8/15~02. Consistent with past years, harvesting priorities were based upon impediment to public boat navigation on the open water. Staff is currently preparing a 2002 EWM Final Harvesting Report, which will be reviewed at an upcoming Regular Board Meeting. Similar to recent years, the EWM Harvesting Program Working Group will meet yet this year to evaluate the 2002 season and discuss possible improvements for 2003. Feel free to contact the LMCD office if you would like a copy of the 2002 EWM Final Harvesting Report. Update on "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka" project: The LMCD has been working with the Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA) the past year to establish a program to keep zebra mussels out of Lake Minnetonka. In May, the LMCD Board authorized the allocation of $8,000, with a minimum match of $8,000 from the LMA, to imPlement a pilot inspection program in 2002 at selected public accesses. This program commenced on July 17th and continued through September 7th, with 428.25 hours of MN DNR inspection hours at Maxwell Bay, North Arm, and Spdng Park public accesses. The LMCD and the LMA are currently preparing a 2002 Zebra Mussel Pilot Inspection Program Report, which will be reviewed at an upcoming Regular Board Meeting. Feel free to contact the LMCD office if you would like a copy of it. 2003 Board Officers & Board Appointments: Board Officers and other Board appointments are planned in the near future. At the 10/9/02 Regular Meeting, the LMCD Board is scheduled to appoint a nominating committee for 2003 Board Officers. Additionally, LMCD staff will be forwarding reminder notices in the near future to those member cities whose Board member term expires at the second Regular Meeting in January 2003. Board member terms, as outlined in the LMCD's state enabling legislation, are for three years. Appointments for 2003 Board Officers and other Board appointments will take affect at the 2/12/03 Regular Meeting. Feel free to contact the LMCD office if you have questions or if you would like to further discuss this matter. On-qoin.~ Licenses/Permits: In August, staff sent out renewal deicing installation applications for the 2002-2003 season on Lake Minnetonka. These applications will be processed in the next month and a copy of the approved license(s) will be forwarded to the appropriate member city. Staff is currently working on sending renewal without change applications, for the 2003 season, for licensed multiple dock and DMA facilities. Staff will be working in the near future on the preparation of renewal applications for charter boats and related liquor licenses for the 2003 boating season. Further details of these on-going licenses/permits are available at the LMCD office. Web Page: 'The LMCD's WebPage address is: http://www.lmcd.org. -4824- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, October 9, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · 10/31/02 Annual Meeting with Hennepin County Shedff's Office Water Patrol, 7:30 A.M. at the Water Patrol Headquarters in Spring Park READING OF MINUTES- 8/28/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 9/25/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting Report: PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. WATER STRUCTURES A) Consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the following variances (handout): · Fredrick & Michelle Pacovsky, adjusted dock use area and dock length. · Shirley Hendrickson & Rick Windenburg, adjusted dock use area, dock length, and side setback. · Mark Finney, dock length. B) Additional Business; EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A) (*) Minutes from the 9/13/02 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting; B) Review of 2002 EWM Final Season Report (handout); C) Analysis of 2002 EWM Trucking Payments; D) Additional Business; FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (8/16/02 - 8/31/02), (9/1/02 - 9/15/02), (9/16/02 - 9/30/02), and (10/1/02 - 10/15/02); -4825- B) (*) August fina~'~ial summary a~d balance sheet; C) Additional Business; 4. ADMINISTRATION A) Appointment of nominating committee for 2003 LMCD Board Officers B) Review of draft letter to be forwarded to LMCD Member Cities regarding BOard appointments for 2003; C) Additional Business; 5. LAKE USE & RECREATION 6. SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION- Performance Evaluation of Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to conduct evaluation in closed session) 11.ADJOURNMENT -4826- DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, WedneSday, August 28, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMillan, Orono; Tom Skramstad, ShorewoOd; Bob Ambrose, WayZata; Doug Babcock, TOnka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Paul Knudsen, Minnetdsta; Tom SeuntjenS, Uinnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Sheldon Wed, Greenwood. Also present: Chades LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Victoria has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMEMTS, Chair Foster There were no Chair announcements. READING OF MINUTES. 7/24/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 8/14/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Babcock moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the minutes from the 7/24~02 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. Babcock stated that he believed the word "undefined" in the ninth paragraph on page 13 should be deleted and the word "underlined" should be inserted. He recommended thiS as a fdendly amendment, skramstad agreed to this. VOTE: Ayes (8), Abstained (2; Burma and Wert);= motion carried. Seuntjens arrived at 7:02 p.m. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Ambrose seconded to approve the minutes from the 8/14/02 Regular Board Meeting az submitted. Wert stated that he was not at this meeting and that he would like to comment and refute Some of the Board discussion from the 8/14/02 Regular Board Meeting pertaining to the' Lake Minnetonka Wetlands TaSk Force. Foster stated that this would be taken up later under agenda item 2A. VOTE:, Ayes (6), Abstained (5; Babcook, Foster, Nelson, Seuntjens, and Wert); motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not'on the agenda, There were no comments from persons in attendance on subjects not on the agenda. -4827- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Boayd Meeting August 28, 2002 PUBLIC HEARING Page 2 Hendrickson/Windenburg and Finney, variance application from LMCD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted dOck use area. lA. Fredrick and Michelle Pacovsky, variance application from LMCD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted dock use area variance (Public Hearing conducted at 6/26/02 Regular Board Meeting). Foster called the public headng to order at 7:05 p.m. and asked staff for background on the proposed apPli%tiSn. Nybeck made the following comments: · The staff memo prepared for the public hearing also pertains to agenda item lA, the pending Pacovsky vadance application. Dudng the public heating and consideration, it would make sense to consider both proposed variance applications at the same time. . · Shirley Hendrickson and Rick Windenburg, 3200 North Shore Drive, and Mark Finney, 3210 North Shore Drive, have submitted a joint vadance application for consideration on Maxwell Bay in the City of Orono. The application has been submitted for vadance from LMCD Code for side setback and dock length requirements, plus an adjusted dock use area. Physical hardships of converging lot: linesand shall water have been identified, with a public hearing notice published in ,the 8/13/02 edition of the Lakeshore Weekly News. · At its 6/26/02 Regular Meeting, ,the Board conducted a public hearing and considered a vadance application from Freddck and Uichelle Pacovsky, 3186 North Shore Ddve. The applicants at this meeting proposed two site plans, with concerns raised BY the abutting property owners. The Board took no action at this meeting and staff was directed to facilitate a meeting with the applicani and ,the affected property owners to investigate whether a revised Site plan could be agreed to by all parties, documented by an updated survey, and brought back for review by the Board at a future Regular Meeting. · Staff facilitated a neighborhood meeting to discuss ,the docking situation in the area on July 11th. In addition to Nybeck, Board members Babcock and UcMillan were in attendance at{his meeting. Aisc in attendance were Fred and Miche!le Pacovsky, Shirley Hendrickson and Rick Windenburg, Rich Anderson, Paul Blomberg, and Mike Wallace. Based on the discussions at this meeting and subsequent discussions amongst these property owners, a revised survey has been proposed for the paCovsky vadance application and the joint variance application submitted for the HenddcksonRVindenburg and Finney sites. Foster stated that this area of Maxwell Bay has a characteristic of shallow water and the proposed docks are longer than what is allowed by LMCD Code.. ~,. ', Nybeck continued his comments: · At the Pacovsky site,.a 90' long straight dock (no canopy) has been proposed from the 27'of continuous 929.4' NGVD shomline~.for`the storage of a 26' long dock and a.jet ski?. The applicant'has' p~p0sedto adjust the eastern extended side site line slightly over 17 degrees to the east and to adjust `the western extended side site line slightly over six degrees to the west for this dock.. No side setback variances are proposed from the adjusted side site line extensions. · At the Hendrickson/Windenburgsite, a 100' 10ng "H" dock (no canopy) has been proposed from the 64~ of continuous 929.4' NGVD shoreline, for the storage of a 26' long dock and a 16' long boat. A six foot side setback is proposed from the eastern adjusted side site tine extension and 15' from the weste~~ Side site line extension. No boats are proposed to be stored on `the east side of the dock. · At the Finney site, a 100' long dock (with canopy) has been proposed from ,the 58' of continuous 929.4 NGVD shoreline, for the storage of a 22' long pontoon and a 19' long boat in front of it. The proposed -4828- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August' 28, 2002 Page'3 canopy and dock structure would comply with Code for side setback requirements for both the dock and the canopy. · Two Code Sections apply to the proposed variance applications. First, Code Section 2.01, subd. 1 requires that docking and watercraft storage be contained within the authorized dock use area for these sites. He reviewed the Code requirements for these sites, noting that none of them were fully contained within their authorized dock use areas. Second, Code Section 1.07 allows the Board to consider applications for variance from Code, prOvided the application of the Code causes the applicant a practical difficulty or a physical hardship. A dock length, side setback, and adjusted dOck use area variance is required for the Pacovsky site. The proposed adjusted dock use area variance has been supported bY the Henddckson/VVindenburg site; however, there has not been direct communication from the abutting neighbor to the east, Paul Blomberg. A dock length and side setback variance is required at the Henddckson/VVindenburg site. A dock length variance is required at the Finney site. · The City of Orono and MN DNR were provided a copy of'both vadance applications. The City of Orono stated that they recommended approval of the proposed variance applications, provided the neighbors can agree on an alternative site plan. No feedback had been received from the MN DNR. · In considering the proposed variance applications, the Board should take into consideration the written comments from Mr. Blomberg. If the BOard is comfortable with the proPoSed variance applications as submitted, staff believes that the Board could direct LeFevere to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the applications as submitted. He recommended those Findings of Fact and Order should be prepared for each site individually. · He entertained comments or queStions from the Board. Wert asked if each of these sites had a primary reSidence. Nybeck stated that each site had a primary residence. Foster asked for comments from the public on the proposed applications.~ Mr. Paul Blomberg, 3180 North ShoreDrive, stated that he was the abutting property owner to the east of the Pacovsky Site. He reviewed cOmmerits he e-mailed to the Distdct on 8/3/02 and 8/4/02, noting that he had some concem'about the proposed variance applicatiOnS for the three abutting Sites to his west At the Pacovsky site, he was not opposed to the proposed dock; however, he would prefer that the boat be stored on the west side of the dock rather than the east, He reviewed Code Pertaining to the authorized dock use area for his site, nOtihg that he believed it would be within his authorized dock use area if a boat were stored on the east side. He believed that there were alternative dock arrangements that would allOW the three neighbors to achieve what they'desire, Which he stated that'he would support. He expressed support that his authorized dock use area would take the brunt of the adjusted lot. lines needed for the proposed vadance ap~licatio'ns. He asked the Board if they had any questions for him. Skramstad asked Blomberg if the dock With four. slips in the 8/3/02 e-mail was hypothetical, Blomberg stated that this dock was hypothetical; however, he would be allowed to install it based on his review of the Code without.a need for 'a variance. He added, that installing the dock as proposed in the hypothetical wOuld not work with the proposed variance aPPliCation for the PacovSky site. Foster stated that the District has established the jurisdiction in the past to adjust extended side site lines when concave conditions exist, nOting that it sOmetimes involveS the adjustment of several propertieS. -4829- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page 4 Knudsen asked Blomberg if moving the hypothetical four-slip dock in front of his site to the east would cause him a hardship. Blomberg stated that the 27' of shoreline at the Pacovsky cleady does not have an authorized dock use area if the side site lines are extended into the lake the same direction they are platted on land. At the neighborhood meeting, he proposed a compromise for the Pacovsky site that would allow for a 17' wide adjusted dock use area with five foot side setbacks from the adjusted side site lines,. This compromise WOuld involve bisecting both of the Pacovsky side site lines; however, it was not well received by the neighbors in the immediate area. He stated he supported the Board granting a variance for access purposes for the Pacovsky site; however, he had concern about the Henddckson/Windenburg.site being granted a 100' long dock length variance at the expense of his authorized dock use area. Wed stated that in concave shoreline situations, which appears to the case in this area, the District has in the past adjusted dock use areas of abutting property owners. He believed that it could be possible for Blomberg to move his proposed hypothetical dock to the east within his authorized dock use area to the east, yet' protect his dparian dghts. Foster stated that if the authorized dock use area is adjusted for the Pacovsky site and it impacts the Blomberg authorized dock use area, it would be the responsibility of both the owners and the interested party purchasing the Pacovsky residence to communicate this in the future. One option for the Board to consider would be to include any variance order approved by the District as part of the deed for the prOperty. The area in question is public water and is not owned by the sites that abut the lake, and are subject to reasonable regulations. Babcock stated that Mr. Blomberg's comments regarding his authorized dock use area were based on strict application of Code. 'He questioned whether it is the responsibility of a property owner that has recently purchased a property with parallel side site lines to look down the shoreline and determine whether it could be impacted in the future by a vadance request by a nearby property. He believed that the primary issue is whether the proposed adjusted dock use area request for the Pacovsky site should be adjusted more with the abutting property owner to the west, the Henddckson/Windenburg site, noting that there would be a need for some give and take. Foster stated that if the Board required'the Pacovsky's to store the 26' long boat on the west side of the dock rather than the east, it probably would include the moving of the Hendrickson/Windenburg dock also to the west, LeFeve'm''. stated that the proposed adjustei:l dock use area for the Pacovsky site would,include adjusting the~eastem extended side site line.slightly over 17 degrees to the east towardsthe Blomberg site and the western extended side site l!ne Slightly over six degrees to the west towards ~the Henddckson/Wjndenburg s te Side setbacks,are not proposed from either adjusted side site lineextension and two watercraft have been., proposed on,the Blomberg side of i~e dock, A six foot side setback has,been proposed from the east edge of the Hendr ckson/Windenburg deck to the adjusted eastern Pacovsky side site line extension. It might make sense for the Board to consider some form of a side setback variance for the Biomberg site on the east side of his dock use area. He believed that there would need to be probably a full side setback from the eastern adjusted extended side site line to provide maneuvering space for the front watercraft stored on the east side of the Pacovsky dock. FOster stated that he believed, there were a number of issues.regarding the proposed variance applications that would not be resolved at this meeting. He suggested moving the discussion along with the public to get their input before the public hearing was closed. Mr. Fred' Pacovsky, 3186 North Shore Ddve, stated that he and his wife submitted the odginal variance application being considered by the Board. There have been discussions with the affected neighbors and staff to amend the -4830- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular 1Board Nleetin~! August 28, 2002 Page 5 original proposed Site plan to make it work. He believed that the proposed site plan addressed the neighborhood concern; however, they would be open to consider other changes. He urged the Board to make a decision in the near future because he believed that the process had been drawn out. Ms. Shirley Hendrickson, 3200 North Shore Drive, cladfied that she had met with Paul Blomberg on August '11th to discuss the proposed site plan. She expressed concern about making further adjustments towards her property because she has a limited amount of shoreline and the location of the North Shore Madna dock causes them problems. She believed that the proposed site plan was reasonable and that both property owners abutting the Pacovsky site needed to give something. Mr. Mike Wallace, 3160 N°dh Shore Drive, stated that he currently shares a dock with the Blomberg's. He expressed concern that the proposed site plan would have a great impact on the Blomberg site because the proposed jet ski does not include proper maneuvering space. He believed that there was enough space to move the structures slightly to the west and that would allow for joint maneuvering areas that would make all parties involved happy, Mr. Rick Windenburg, 3200 North Shore Drive, stated that if the Board had concerns about maneuvering space for the proposed jet ski at the Pacovsky dock, it could be moved to the west side of the dock where a 6' side setback has been proposed from the adjusted side site line. Babcock stated that if that were the case, it would require a greater adjustment of the western side site line. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m. McMillan complimented the neighborhood for the compromises that had taken place to accommodate the docking needs for the Pacovsky site, She questioned whether the request made by the Pacovskys for two watemraft is reasonable. She suggested that it might be appropriate to limit the number and size of watercraft at this site. Babcock echoed the comments of McMillan and complimented the efforts of the neighborhood. He believed that the proposed dock was relatively close; however, there are four points for the Board to consider if the applications are sent back to staff for further work~ They include: 1) limiting the number and size of watercraft at the Pacovsky dock, possibly to 24' length with less beam width, 2) the angles are skewed slightly to the south and should be equaled out, 3) there might be a possibility to granted a further dock length variance at the Hendfickson/VVindenburg site to accommodate for the. Pacovsky site with further adjustments.to the west, and 4)any reduction in the dock use area for the Blomberg site could be adjusted elsewhere in the their authorized dock use area: Foster stated that he would support reducing the proposed adjustment of the eastem extended side site line. The Board directed staff to get the applicants and the affected property owners together to resolve the issues addressed by the Board. The meeting was recessed at 8:03 p.m. and re-convened at 8:07 p.m. WATER STRUCTURES B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. -4831 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 2. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Page 6 Ordinance Amendment, Discussion of an ordinance prohibiting the use of motorized watemraft on certain pads of Lake Minnetonka, amending Section 3.022. Foster stated that he was unable to attend the 8/14/02 Board meeting when this ordinanCe amendment was discussed in detail. He asked Wed for his comments on the discussion at this meeting. Wed commented on the work of the Lake Minnetonka Wetlands Task Fome, noting that there was a lot of information collected and discussed at a number of meetings. There were a number of altematives brought' forward to the Board, recalling the Board meeting in May when a straw poll vote on various options was taken. Foster expressed concem about moving the point of demamation from the mouth of Six Mile Creek upstream as proposed in the ordinance amendment. He believed that the electdc motor limitation in 'the ordinance cgi~'i--~ntly approved would solve the vast majority of the concems of the Board and would not preclude property owners from enjoying the riparian rights they are entitled to by having properties that abut Six Mile Creek. He supported the ordinance already approved by the Board, noting that the City of Minnetrista could adopt a more restrictive ordinance than the one approved by the District. Babcock stated that there have been examples in the past when the District has set baseline standards and member cities have adopted more restrictive ordinances than these standards. Suerth stated that the Board has spent a lot of time considering an ordinance that would balance the environmental concems with the dparian dghts of owners that have properties that abut the creeks referenced in the ordinance amendment. He noted that ordinance adopted addresses other creeks in addition to Six Mile Creek and that he would like to move on. Knudsen stated that when the straw poll voted was taken by the Board this past May, he understood that more than one draft ordinance amendment would come back to the Board for consideration. When one ordinance amendment came back to the Board in June,. he was caught off guard when itdid not take into consideration the request from the City of Uinnetdsta to protect the historical dghts of the four property owners on Six Mile Creek. He stated that he did not recall the Board receiving expert teStimOny that propeller action from an electric motor would have less impact on the environment and wildlife than propeller action from a gas motor. UcUillan stated that she was-the Board member who made the motion for LeFevete to draft the ordinance: amendment being discussed by the Board, She expressed con~m' abOUt restricting the type of motor use in the creek and would favor eliminating areas of the creeks that have historical use from the adopted ordinance. She believed that the pdmary environmental advantage ofelectric motors cornpared to gas mdtors is that they,db not have gas fumes. She believed the type of dock structure, whether there is removal of vegetation,, and whether a dredge iS required are other environmental ~oncem~ that should be cOnsidered by the BOard? She stated that she would not support grandfathering because she believed that is not good policy on publiC waters. Nelson stated that he did not support the draft ordinance amendment. He eXpressed support of the ordinance adopted because there was a significant amount of work done by the Task Fome, it greatly improves the situation, and it was a compromise to preserve the dpadan dghts of property owners :o'h:these t~utades.' He questioned the logic of moving the point of demamations upstream on both Six Mile and Long Lake Creeks as proposed in the draft ordinance amendment. If the City of Minnetrista has a desire to restrict motorized watercraft upstream from a certain point of Six Mile Creek, he believed that they COuld adopt an ordinance amendment that was more restrictive than the one adopted by the Board. -4832- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting · August 28, 2002 Page 7 Babcock stated that when the Board took the straw poll vote in May, them were a number of possible amendments to the matrix prepared by LeFevem and Wert. He recalled that there was significant discussion on possible amendments, with only a couple of amendments proposed by Board membere that ~vere voted on that evening. If a Board member believed that amendment they wanted was not considered in the adopted ordinance, they could propose it at a later date. He stated that~he did not support the proposed ordinance amendment because he believed eliminating power boat traffic in the proposed creeks is good for the lake on a long-term basis. His long-term goal for the Board is to take incremental steps to protect the upstream areas of the lake by reducing extemal loading of phosphorous from these tributaries. The characteristic of the wetland ama :of Painter's Creek has changed significantly over the years with development and he questioned whether it makes sense to restore it to its pristine state. He believed it makes sense for Six Mile and Long Lake Creeks and he supported the ordinance adopted by the Board, noting that he believed there is other work for the Task Force to deal with pertaining to other wetland areas on Lake Uinnetonka. In the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, it calls for public bodies such as the District to acquire easements over wetland areas to provide protection beyond what can be provided through legislation. He suggested that the Board might want to consider this as an option to limit boat storage in these wetland areas, noting that he already had preliminary discussions with the four property owners on Six Mile Creek that have claimed historical use. Skramstad stated that he would support protecting the historical ripadan rights of property owners that abut the tributaries referenced in the adopted ordinance, whether it be through grandfathering or adjusting the points of demarcation. Ambrose stated that the easement idea suggested by Babcock was intriguing and merited further exploration. He supported protecting the environmental aspect of the lake and protecting the interests of the property owners that have historical use of these tributaries, preferably in the form of the ordinance amendment as proposed. McMillan stated that she understood that boat traffic on Six Mile and Long Lake Creeks was currently pretty limited and that the ordinance adopted would make them more accessible for boat storege. She believed that this provides a false sense of accessibility. Babcock stated that he had concerns about removing restrictions of all types from certain areas of both Long Lake and Painter's Creeks, including the removal of language that would allow for electdc motors. McMillan stated that them are bays of Lake Minnetonka that am shallow that have not currently been addressed. Foster asked McMillan if there was a distinction between bays that do not have flowing water versus tributaries that have flowing water. McMillan stated that flowing water makes a difference; however, she did not have a scientific answer to it. Weft stated that the Board directed the Task Force to bifurcate the study of the tributaries from the wetland areas of the overall lake. He believed that consideration of other wetland areas on the lake will be forthcoming and that the ordinance adopted was only the first step, Babcock questioned whether there is an absolute dght to store and dock a motorized watercraft on a body of water based on the State of Minnesota's definition of access, citing the electric motor restrictions on Lake Hardet and Lake Calhoun in Minneapolis as an example. He stated that he believed the crux of the problem is the economic issues for a few property owners that need tobe addressed.. He questioned whether this supports the -4833- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page 8 concept of eliminating the ordinance that has already been adopted by the Board. The MCWD has spent a large amount of money restoring wetlands near,Lake Harriet and he believed that could be prevented in the upper watershed district by establishing the correct mechanisms. Nelson stated that he would be supportive of continued discussions with property owners who can document historical usage, possibly through a conservation easement, as long as it limits the number of boats be stored. McMillan stated that in the draft ordinance amendment pertaining to Six Mile Creek, there was not language that described the area upstream of the fish traps from the Ralph Hatch residence. LeFevere stated that he was awaiting the legal description of this location from the legal counsel for the four property owners. Babcock stated that he would prefer the Board not take action on the proposed ordinance amendment for a variety of reasons. MOTION: Babcock moved, Nelson seconded to table discussion on the draft ordinance amendment to a future Board meeting. Mr. Chris Dietzen, legal counsel for the four property owners on Six Mile Creek, stated that he would like to be heard before there was a vote on the motion. Foster denied the request from Dietzen because Robert's Rule of Order does not allow for discussion on motion to table. Dietzen stated that the Board had incomplete information that was not included in the Board packet. Babcock clarified that his motion was to table action on the draft ordinance amendment to a future Board meeting rather than table discussion of it at this meeting, Foster asked LeFevere for interpretation of the motion. LeFevere stated that he believed the motion was out of order because there was no motion on the floor to table. It"appeared that the intent of the motion made was to decide hOW to limit discussion of the proposed ordinance amendment, noting that this could possibly be achieved through another motion. Babcock stated that his intent would be to allow for discussion of the proposed ordinance amendment at this meeting; however, not take formal action on it at this meeting. Foster ruled the motion out of order. Dietzen stated that correspondence was previougly submitted that stated the Ordinance adoPted by the Board applied to his clients was unlawful, improper, unconstitutional,and a tal(ing Of ripadan rights. An invitation was previously made to investigate whether something could be done to resolve these issues. A verbal proposal has been made that.would include either moving the point of demarcation upstrea~ ~m his clients or possibly grandfathering, 'Draft ordinance amendments have been prepared that would either move the'point of ' demarcation or grandfather his clients based, on the discussion atthe previoUS'BOard meeting. Hi§ clients have agreed to the following relating to these ordinanCe amendments: 1) that grandfather rights WOUld nbt extend to -4834- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting AugUSt 28, 2002 Page 9 guests or invitees of the property owner, 2) to limit the number of docks to four which would be one for each of his clients, 3) to release their property rights for multiple docks to four to resolve the dispute, and 4) to limit to the current version of Code Section 2.02 of the LMCD Ordinance which limits the number of watercraft that may be stored at a dock structure. LeFevere asked Dietzen whom he was negotiating with. Dietzen stated that he was responding to comments from individual Board members, noting that his clients had a separate meeting with Babcock relating to potential easements. His clients would agree to exeCute a Settlement Agreement and a Restrictive Covenant under either of the ordinance amendments. If a conservation easement is more acceptable to the Board, his clients are acceptable to consider it. He did not recommend that any portion of the ordinance adopted be changed, with the exception that sUbd. 4 should be added that WOuld provide language for Pre-existing rightS for his clients. His clients would like the same dghts that other property owners enjoy; however, his clients werewiiling to discuss this. He stated that he was unaware of any scientific study presented to the Board that subStantiates the difference ~f external loading of phosphorous for an electric motor versus a gas motor. If the Board decides not to take action on an amendment that would address his clients concerns, he requested that they have an opportunity to meet with representatives of the Board to further address this issue. Mr. Adrian Herbst, The Bailer Herbst Law Group, stated that he represented Robert and Janice Halverson who are longstanding property owners on Six Mile Creek. His clients have 111 acres of property with 1,400' of shoreline. He stated that he was not present to oppose any action the BOard might take to address the four property owners on Six Mile Creek. However, his clients would objeCt to an ordinance that would entirely prohibit the use of a motorized watercraft, noting that the current ordinance would allow for watercraft with electric motors. He commented on the concept of conservation easements and their applicability to his clients property. Amborse asked Herbst if his clients had historical use of Six Mile Creek in the past. Herbst Stated that his clients have accessed Six Mile Creek in the past with both motorized and non-motorized watercraft, although they do not have a dock currently installed. Minnetrista Mayor Cheryl FisCher stated that she was at the previous Board meeting and that~she would like to see the District ordinances mirror the ordinances that may be adopted by the Minnetdsta City Council. She stated that she understood the Board had spend a significant amount of time studying these issues;, however, there ama number of conflicting pa~ibS interested inSix Uile Oreek. Foster asked Mayor Fischer to have the City of Minnetdsta staff forward agenda's, minutes, and packet information to keep the Distdct informed on city '~ouncil discusSions, Mr. Dan Kelly, legal counsel for Upland Farms, commented on the draft ordinance amendment being discussed by the Board. The ordinance adopted was discussed for a number of months with a lot of thoughts discussed, adding it was a compromise. It takes into consideration environmental and property right~ conCerns, nOting that he believed moving the point of demarcation was not consistent with previous policy discussions. He be!ieyed that the balance of environmental and property rights would be a problem with the proposed ordinanCe amendment because non-motorized watercraft would be prohibited upstream from the new point o'f demarcation. He recommended that the Board not consider the proposed ordinance amendment. Mr. Greg smlth,4000 Gamefarrn Road, stated that:he had recently met.with Babcock to diSCuss theconcept of conservation easements. H~'belieVed that the proposal to limit the number of dockS to foUr was a valuable -4835- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting August 28, 2002 Page 10 concession on their part. Additionally, he and his neighbors would be agreeable to the limit the size of the watercraft and would abide by the ordinance upstream from their properties. He stated that he would like to see further discussion pertaining to the possibility of the concept of conservation easements. Foster stated that he believed the four property owners in question have historically had one watercraft. He expressed concern that the four docks proposed could have up to four watercraft at each dock, which would result in 16 watercraft. Smith stated that he would be agreeable to further discussion about the number of watercraft that would be stored at the four proPOsed docks. Babcock stated that when he met with Smith and his neighbors to discuss the concept of conservation easements, he represented that the discussions were with a Board member rather than as representative of the Board, The intent of the meeting was listen, to their concems and see if there were different solutions that could be brought back to entire Board for discussion purposes. He expressed concern about future subdivisions and he believed that conservation easements might be one approach to deal with them relating to boat storage in these areas. Ambrose stated that the proposal offered by Dietezen was substantial and a good place to begin discussions. Mr. Jim Blakeway stated that he was in attendance to speak on behalf of most residents on Halsteads Bay. There is some sentiment of the Halsteads Bay Wetlands PreservatiOn Group in favor of continued historical use of property owners on Six Mile Creek. However, there is no sentiment to allow for further usage of Six Mile Creek, whether it is electric or gas motors, beyond these four property owners. Foster summarized what he believed were the discussions of the Board and the public at this meeting. He believed that it would be appropriate for a sub-committee, chaired by Babcock, to work on the possibility of conservation easements and other details. He recommended that he and Weft should also participate in this meeting, noting that any other Board members would also be welcomed to attend these discussions. LeFevere provided an overview of Open Meeting laws, noting that any meeting scheduled would be subject to Open Meeting laws. The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to schedule a meeting in the near future to further discuss the concept of conservation easements. The meeting was recessed at 9:33 p.m. and re-convened at 9:35 p.m. B, Additional Business. There was no additional business. 3, FINANCIAL :~ A. July. financial summary and balance sheet. Skramstad stated that the monthlY financial summary and balance sheet is generally on the consent agenda; however, he requested that it not be a consent agenda at this meeting because of the new format implemented in 2002 that compares planned revenues and expenditures versus actual revenues and expenditures for all three -4836- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting Aucju~t 2~, 2002 Page budgets. He provided a detailed overview of the July financial summary and balance sheet and a budget variance report that he had prepared. The Board accepted the July financial summary and balance sheet as submitted and complimented the efforts of Skramstad. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 4. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE Suerth provided a brief update on the 2002 EWM Harvesting Program and the public access inspections being conducted in association with the "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Uinnetonka" project. Nybeck stated that final rePorts for these projects would be prepared in the near future and brought forward to the Board for review and comments. Suerth stated that he would check with Dick Osgood on availability of Lake Minnetonka Association funds to assist the District in the 2002 program. Foster stated that he had recently attended two local Rotary Club meetings and that he believed there is a base of volunteers who are interested in a project to help the lake. He believed that one potential project for these volunteers could be to assist in the public access inspections in conjunction with the zebra mussel program. 5. ADMINISTRATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVE THE LAKE McMillan stated that the summer solicitation letter was recently sent out and that donations are currently being received. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck stated that a copy of the 8/20/02 Lakeshore Weekly News article and 8/23/02 New Release pertaining to the "High-Water Declaration" on Lake Minnetonka were included in the handout folders for informational purposes. He summarized recent lake level readings~ noting that it was 930.28' on 8/23/02, 930.32' on 8/26/02, and 930.28' on 930.28'. He reported that the discharge during these days was 300 c.f.s. The Board discussed the current policy pertaining "High-Water" on Lake Minnetonka. Some of the discussion items included: · How active the Sheriffs Water Patrol was enforcing it and the need for an update from them on this. · The difficulty of educating the public of the 600' minimum-wake requirement dudng a "High-Water Declaration". · The possible need to update the policy to establish a minimum-wake requirement for the entire lake during similar circumstances in the future. -4837- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting AuguSt 28, 2002 Page12 · Whether the District should affect the use pattem of a couple thousand of boats dudng periods that are a fact of nature when dock can be raised and shoreline can be further protected. · A number of the complaints received from the public have been from properties built in the floodplain for Lake Minnetonka. · The need to improve communications with the public on the "High-Water Declaration". · There is a need to find a balance of the dghts of the riparian owners on Lake Minnetonka with the general public. Nybeck stated that an update from the Sheriff's Water Patrol on their activities was tentatively scheduled for a Board meeting in September. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business, 9, NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:08 p.m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -4838- DR FT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE MINUTES 8:30 a.m., Friday, September 13, 2002 LMCD Office, 18338 Mtka BlVd., Deephaven, MN Present: Herb Suerth, LMCD Board; Chip Welling, MN DNR; John Baden, Three Rivers Park District; Nell Vanderbosch, MN DNR; Greg Nybeck, LMCD Executive Director. Minutes. The Task Force accepted the minutes from the 7/12/02 EWM/Exotics Task Force meeting as submitted. Update of 2002 LMCD Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) Harvesting Program. NybeCk stated that the final report f~r the 2002 EWM' HarVesting program was being prepared and would be forwarded in the neat future for review. He detailed the highlights of the 2002 season, which included: · The high lake level conditions on Lake Minnetonka and the impact it has had on milfoil growth, especially matted areas. · The statistics in 2002, primarily truck loads, harVester loads, and acres harVested, will probably be slightly down in 2002 compared to other recent years, primarily due to the high-water conditions. A hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS) has recently been pumhased to improve the program in its buoy placement and estimated acreage. Some preliminary information will be experimented with in 2002; hOwever, the actual use of it in conjunction with the program will' be implemented in 2003. · He addressed the improvements made the past few years with the maintenance of the EWM harvesting equipment and how it has improved the efficiency of the program. · The District is considering the purchase of a new harvester and the trade-in of possibly two harvesters for the 2003 season, noting that the harvester purchased a few years ago is much more productive than the original harVesters purchased. · The number of calls received from the public were down from past years and were primarily from residents that had fragmented milfOil along their shoreline rather than milfoil growth in the lake itself. The TaSk FOrce discusSed a number of issues pertaining to this agenda item, Two of them included: · A number of other akes arOund the State of Minnesota and in the Lake Minnetonka area also had high lake,l~evel conditi0ns that had an impact on matted areas. · Harvest ng programs andthe pub ic percept on that fragmented milfoil and other vegetation is pd.rnar:!y CaUsed by them, The.genera public does not take into cons derati°n that wind, waves, and propellers .are Pr ~ary contributors to fragmented milfoil and other vegetation Suerth stated that an EWM Harvesting Program Working Group Meeting should be conducted in the near future to evaluate the 2002: season and begin preparations for 2003. Update of ,'Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka" Project~ NybeCk~s!ated !hat the 2002 pi'lot program thai included inspection of watercraft by MN DNR employees at Maxwell Bay, North Arm, and Spdng Park public had recently concluded, The program began on July 17th and continUed through September 7th, with a final report to be prepared by the DiStdct and the LMA. He reviewed a spreadsheet that highlighted peak hour and non-peak hour inspections conducted in conjunction with the program. -4839- ~'"'E~I~OTICS TASK FORCE, 9113102, PAGE 2 Suerth discussed the possible need to better monitor for veligers at commemial facilities and public accesses on Lake Minnetonka. Welling stated that the pilot program being discussed was a supplementary program to the mandated program that requires around 20,000 hours of inspections at public accesses by the MN DNR around the State of Minnesota, primarily at infested waters. He diScussed the procedures utilized by these inspectors dudng their inspections. Barren asked if Three Rivers Park Distdct employees staffing the gate at the Lake Minnetonka Regional Park had been trained this summer to conduct similar inspections. Welling stated that he would need to check further into this. The Task Force discussed a number Of:isSues pertaining to this agenda item. Some of them included: · The need to improve eduCational efforts and communications with commercial transporting companies relating to the spread of zebra mussels and other exotic species. · The need for the eStabliShment of a database of commercial transporting companie'~ that operate in the State of Minnesota, noting that Distdct staff had begun the process. There was discussion that this databaSe CoUld possibly be enhanced in the future, possibly by a MN DNR intem, · There were few problems associated with the pilot program between the public and the inspectors at the public aCCeSses. · There was discussion on preparations that need to begin for this program for the 2003 season. · There was discussion on local regatta's held on Lake Minnetonka this past summer and the lack of coordination with the District staff on the use of the high-pressure sprayer. Nybeck stated that he was currently working with Dick OSgood on the final report of the 2002 pilot project, noting that it should be finalized in the near future for review by the Task FOrce. A~encv Reports. W~l'li~g Provid'e~an overview of the MN DNR cost sharing, prog[am,, noting .a decision was made to reduce the number of lakes where high-intensity management WoUld take pla~, which would include a MN DNR surve and possibly a her~ c de treatment be a contractor based on the d rect on from the MN DNR In the past, approximatelY i5 tO 20 lakes Would fall into'this category, with aPproximatelY i2°f them haVing h~icide treatments. There were aPproximateiy six cate~:b~es:tha~ Wthinihe high.intensi~ management category in 2002. The ~aj°r;itY of't'he mah=agement~6~acted bY'the'MN~N~ ~as ~targeted at nuisance's, With 93 lake~ be§innirYg in'the'bate~ory at~thb be§inning'~f~:th~ year and 99 at the end of the year, $80,000 Of fundi'ng'W:as''h,iade available to.'theSe.iak~s foi, ~o~.{."~hari~g. parposes":~ APPliCatiOns were received from 30 of the lakes;With: '18 of them approved bYthe M~' DNRi '~b~Pi~ints'~ ie~ived f~bm the public in 2002 were relatively Iow, noting that they paralleled the feedback received from the public by the DiStrict and Throe Rive~ Park District.. There Were seven new infestations of bOdie's~5! water: ~is year.with milfoil, which increases the total to 140 tn the State of Minnesota. Barren stated that he had no sPecifiC: commetits on milfoii, other than he was' ~orkin~g with the MiN ~NR and the City Of PlymOuth ona comprehensive aquatic plaint management plan for Ued c ne Lakel prOVided an overview of,the cbmp(~nents of the management plan, including improved water ~iuaiity clarity and streamlining the.permit :p~fOceSs With the MNbNR oh"Medicine Lake. He stated:~ha{ he :believed' the total phosphoroUs tevels o'n MediCine 'Lake have i:mproved gi'eaily inth:e past fi'~/e yea~-s With 'the banof phosphorus fertilizers within the City of Plymouth. He discussed possible water quality i~pmvement -4840- EVVM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE, 9/13/02, PAGE 3 projects on Lake Minnetonka, specifically Jennings and Halsteads Bays, and the need to address both external and internal loading. Vanderbosch stated that he had observed and received feedback from some residents on Lake Minnetonka and a few other lakes regarding the reduction of the effectiveness of chemical treatments this past summer. He believed that the high lake level conditions and operator error could have contributed to this. Area wide lake association reports. There were no area wide lake association reports. Old business. There was no old business. New business. There was no new business. Adjournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 a.m. Respectfully Submitted, Greg Nybeck Executive Director -4841 - BOARD MEMBERS Bert Foster Chair Deephaven craig Nelson vj~e C'h~i rl Spring Park Lili McMil!an SecretarY, Orono Tom Skramstad Treasurer, Shorew0od Bob Ambrose Wayzata Douglas E. Babcock Tonka Bay Crv BUrma Mound. Tom Gilman Excelsior Paul Knudsen Minneirista Tom seuntjens Minnetonka Beach Herb J, Suerth Woodland Katy Van Hercke Minnetonka Sheld°n wart Greenwood LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI.ON DISTRICT 18338 MINNETONKA BLVD.- DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEPHONE 952/745-0789 · FAX 952/745-9085 October 11, 2002 Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LMCD Member Cities ~.~ Greg Nybeck, EXecutive Director Appointment of 2003 Board Members It is approaching the time of the year When termS fOr some of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Board of Directors members Will expire. Terms on the LMCD Board run from FebrUary 1st through January 31st of the following year. The state enabling LMCD legislatioh calls for BOard members to be appointed for three-year terms subject tO recall bY the cities. There is no applicable term limits for BOard members. Because the application of the LMCD ordinances are inherently unique and it takes some period of time for new Board members to come up to speed, it would be difficult and undesirable to have all Board members terms expire at the same time, poSsibly ending up with a completely new Board or a moStly new Board. The LMCD has, therefore, requeSted the 14 cities to ~tagger the member's terms by appointing five members the first :year; five the second year, and four the third year (5~5-4). We realize that some of the cities prefer to make all their appointments yearlY; however, this is not consistent with the LMCD enabling act. The cities do have the ability to recall their member anytime an( appoint another for the remainder of a 3-year, term if the need arises. Below is a list of when the current Board member terms expire in January of: 2003 2004 2005' BOb Ambrose-WaYZata Bert FOster~Deephaven Crv Burma-Mound DOug BabCock-Tonka Bay Tom Seuntjens. Mtka. BeaCh Paul Knudsen,Ui.nnetrista Tom'Gilman-Excelsior Katy Van Hercke-Mtka Craig Ne Son-Spring Park Lii! McUilian.O~'ono Tom Skramsta d~s ho rewoed Hei"b. S"~:e~WOodland She~ldo~ We~een'~%d VaCant-ci~~ Of Vict°ria In order to achieve,~he go~! of.staggering Board member aPPoi~mentS to the fUlleSt: extent' P;°ssi~i~;~i~';>rewi°uSly· aPi~'roved i~Y:the LM'C~ ·Board of:Directors, we req :e:st,;the fgii6wi: 'a:.' :It, a~p°int':i~ard '~e~bfs f0~the f0jlOWifig !{arms ' ExcelsiOr, 3 years '3 years` 20% PO~t ~a~waste S'h~O~'e, W0~d~: ,I .year To;~ka 'Bay~. 2' years Wo~diand; 3: yeats We~Page Address; http:/!~:!mCd.Org ~-~mail Address: irnC,~i~4m~d,0rg' -4842- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO action needs to be taken bY the Cities of Deephaven, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound and Spring Park this'year, PleaSe advise our office if for some reason your recordS are not in agreement with ours. Aisc, enclosed'is a spreadsheet that summarizeS Board members attendance through September of Calendar year 2002. This information is intended for review by your City coun0il, Your prompt attention and cooperation in processing this important appointment is appreciated. -4843- -4844- C H A RTERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://www, kennedy-graven.com JOHN B. DEaN Att0mcy at Law Direct Dial (612) 3370207 Email: jdean@kennedy-graven.com October 4, 2002 Kandis M. Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Dreamwood Litigation. Dear Kandis: Attached is the motion and memorandum from the non-abutters relating to their intervention in the lawsuit. You may wish to provide the council with copies. Respectfully yours, JBD:jms -4845- SEP 2 A 200 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN John M. Anderson et al, Plaintiffs, vs. City of Mound, Defendant. DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SCHEDULING ORDER File No. MC 02-11148 Based upon the Court's consideration information submitted by the parties, of scheduling IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That all discovery, including independent medical examination(s), if applicable, shall be completed by March 7, 2003. All telephone conferences/motions relative to discovery shall be scheduled with the court for determination on or before the discovery cutoff date. No discovery dispute shall be brought to the attention of the Court unless the parties have conferred and made a good faith effort to settle their dispute pursuant to Minn.R.Civ. P. 37.01(b) and Minn. Gen. R.Prac. 115.10. The party raising an unresolved discovery issue shall first arrange a telephone conference with the Court to determine if the dispute can be resolved without a formal motion. No formal motion papers shall be filed prior to the telephone conference. A formal motion may be scheduled only if the undersigned believes it necessary at the time of the telephone conference. 2. That a JOINT Statement Of the Case shall be filed by 4:30 p.m. on April 4, 2003. 3. That all dispositive~motions shall be scheduled with the court to be heard on or before April 24, 2009. The scheduling of a dispositive motion requires considerable advance notice(as much as three to four months) to the undersigned's clerk to get on the calendar. One courtesy copy of motion papers would be appreciated. 4. That counsel for the parties have agreed that ADR in the form of mediation is appropriate in this case. Counsel shall select a neutral by December 20, 2002. They shall notify the court~. of their selection; if they are unable to agree or fail to do so, the court will make a referral. Counsel shall also'n°tify the court of the date and outcome of ADR session{s). Counsel shall -4846- agree as to the timing~ of mediation - i.e., whether it would be more useful to proceed early or after the close of discovery. Mediation shall be completed by April 18, 2003, unless any dispositive motions are pending at that time; if so, mediation shall be completed within 30 days of the date the court issues its order determining said dispositive motions. Mediation is mandatory. All mediation sessions shall be attended in person by the attorneys who will try the case, the parties involved in the litigation, claims adjusters and any and all other persons who have the authority to settle the case. Any questions regarding the identity of the specific persons who shall attend the mediation shall be directed to t~e mediator, who is delegated sole authority whether or not to excuse anyone's attendance, and whose decision on this issue shall be final. 5. That a pretrial/settlement conference, if necessary, shall be set at a later date. A trial date, if necessary, shall be set at the pretrial/settlement conference. 6. Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the non- complying party/attorney to appropriate sanctions, which may include entry of a default judgment, dismissal of the case, and/or the imposition of costs against the delinquent party/attorney. Dated: September 20, 2002 BY THE COURT: Catherine L '~Judge ~'~strict Court (612) 348-2092 (612) 348-5215 (fax) C1430 Hennepin County Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 cc: Marc D. Simpson George C. Hoff Timothy. T. Nolan -4847- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN OCT - 2 ZODZ CASE TYPE: OTHER CIVIL DISTRICT COURT Catherine L. Anderson Court File No.: 02-11148 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT John M. Anderson, et al., Vo City of Mound, et al., Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Citizens for Commons Association, a Non-Profit Neighborhood Association, Applicant for Intervention. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION Court File No.02-11148 TO: PLAINTIFFS & AND THEIR ATTORNEY, MARC D. SIMPSON, LEONARD STREET & DEINARD, P.A., 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET, SUITE 2300, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 AND DEFENDANTS AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD, GEORGE C. HOFF, HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER, P.A., 775 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned will bring the following Motion on for hearing before one of the Honorable Judge Catherine L. Anderson of the above-named court at the Hennepin County Government Center, City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, on October 21, 2002, at 1:15 p.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard. MOTION Citizens for Commons Association moves the Court for its Order allowing intervention in the abOve-captioned matter, and said intervention being of right pursuant to the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure 24.01 in order to assert its claims as set forth in its proposed Answer, a copy -4848- of which is attached hereto. Said Motion is made upon all the files, records and proceedings herein to date. Dated: /~/' ff -, 2002 RIDER, BENNETT, EGAN & ARUNDEL, LLP By imothy J/Nolgf~f203671) -- Caroline Dstrg~(278476) Attorneys for Citizens go5 Commons Association 333 South Seventh Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, ~ 55402 (612) 340-8911 887993-1 2 -4849- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CASE TYPE: OTHER CIVIL DISTRICT COURT Catherine L. Anderson Court File No. 02-11148 FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT John M. Anderson, et al., City of Mound, et. al, and Citizen for Commons Association, a Non-Profit Neighborhood Plaintiffs, Defendants, Association, Applicant for Intervention. MEMoRANDuM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE Court File No.02-11148 I. INTRODUCTION Citizens for Commons Association ("Citizens for Commons'") moves the Court, pursuant to Rule 24.01, Minn. R. Civ. P., for leave to intervene in the above-captioned action to file its Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint. Because the disposition of this action could impair the property right of members of Citizens for Commons, because these interests are not adequately represented in this action, and because this motion is timely under the circumstances, this is an apprOpriate c~se for intervention. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS In 1907, John D. Chipman and Jesse Chipman, the fee owners of property along Lake Minnetonka, located in what is now the City of Mound, Minnesota, dedicated some of the 887994 -4850- property into a plat called the Dreamwood development. The plat contained a piece along the lakeshore called the Wiota Common, which was dedicated to the owners of all of the lots in the development, not just those owners abutting the lake. In the intervening years, the in-land owners of Dreamwood have had access and used the Wiota Common, in more recent years principally to dock boats and gain access to these boats. In its Complaint dated July 3, 2002, the Plaintiffs in this action, homeowners of Dreamwood whose property adjoins the Wiota Common, have sued the City of Mound, et al., requesting that the Court find there is no basis for the public (including the in-land owners in Dreamwood) to have access to Wiota Common, or for the City to maintain and license docks there. Citizens for Commons, a non-profit neighborhood association that now moves to intervene in this action, is composed of members who are in-land homeowners in Dreamwood, The Plaintiffs have objected to who assert that they have interests in the Wiota Common. Citizens for Commons timely Notice of Intervention. III. CITIZENS FOR COMMONS IS ENTITLED TO INTERVENE IN THE INSTANT ACTION AS A MATTER OF RIGHT PURSUANT TO RULE 24.01 OF THE MINNESOTA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Rule 24.01, Minn. R. Civ. P., establishes a four-part test that a non-party must meet to intervene as a matter of right. The intervenor must show: (1) a timely application for intervention; (2) an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action; (3) circumstances demonstrating that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter 'impair or impede its ability to protect that interest; and (4) that it is not adequately represented by the existing parties. Erickson v. Bennett, 409 N.W.2d 884, 886 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987); Minneapolis Star & Trib. Co. v. Schumacher, 392 N.W.2d 179, 207 (Minn. 1986). See Rule 24.01, Minn. R. Civ. P. The spirit behind Rule 24 is to encourage all legitimate 887994 2 -4851 - interventions, and the rule is to be liberally applied. Engelrup v. pOtter, 302 Minn. 157, 166, 224 N.W.2d 484, 489 (1974); Gmman v. Hendrickson, 416 N.W.2d 497, 500 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987); Erickson, 409 N.W.2d at 887. Rule 24.01. A. Citizens for Commons clearly meets the requirements of Citizens for Commons' Motion For Intervention Is Timely. An application to intervene must be timely. Minn. R. Civ. P. 24.01. The timeliness of an application to intervene is determined by the particular circumstances of the case, including such factors as "how far the suit has progressed, the reason for any delay in seeking interVention, and any prejudice to the existing parties because of a delay." Minneapolis Star & Trib. Co., 392 N.W.2d at 207. There can be no argument, and Plaintiffs have not asserted that Citizens for Commons d(d not intervene in a timely manner. The Summons and Complaint was served on or about July 3, 2002, Defendant City of Mound served their Answer on or about July 26, 2002, and Citizens for Commons served their Notice of Intervention and Intervenor's Answer on July 31, 2002. There has been no delay in intervention and no resulting prejudice. B. Member of Citizens for Commons Claims an Interest Related to the Property that is the Subject of the Action, Namely, the Wiota Commons. An intervenor must claim an interest related to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action. Minn..R. Civ. P. 24.01..Citizens for Commons, a non-profit neighborhood organization composed of in-land homeowners of the Dreamwood development, as set forth in the Answer, attached, who claim interests related to the property that is the subject of the action. Namely, the members of Citizens for Commons claim that the Wiota Common, the central part of the property in dispute, is lakeshore property of a public or quasi-public nature, whereas Plaintiffs maintain that neither the public nor the in-land owners have any interest at all relating to the Common. 887994 3 -4852- Plaintiffs have incorrectly asserted that Citizens for Commons lacks standing to intervene, because either they have claimed no real estate rights to the property at issue, or because an association cannot assert real estate rights on behalf of its members. First, Citizens for Commons does not claim any real estate right to the property, rather, it asserts that the in-land homeowners have a distinct interest relating to the Wiota Common, apart from whatever interests Defendant City of Mound may have. Second, Plaintiffs have failed to cite any Minnesota law in support of its assertion that an association cannot assert such a claim on behalf of its members. Cf. Minn. Stat. § 540.151 (when two or more people associate and act under a common name, whether for profit of not, they may sue in or be sued by such common name). Moreover, Citizens for Commons clearly has representative standing for the in-land homeowners as: 1) its members would have standing to intervene in their own right, 2) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to its purpose, and 3) neither the claim asserted nor the relief requested requires the participation of the individual members in the lawsuit. See Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., 373 N.W.2d 784, 790 (Minn. App. 1985), affm 389 N.W.2d 205 (Minn. July 2, 1986); Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm., 432 U.S.333, 343, 97 S.Ct. 2434, 2441 (1977). There is no question that the first two elements of this test are met. With respect to the third element, Citizens for Commons seeks intervention at this for the limited purpose of asserting that Plaintiffs must sue all in-land owners in Dreamwood and, indeed, all parties with interest in those in-land properties, to obtain the relief sought. If the Court agrees and orders that all persons with interests in the in-land properties be made parties, then Citizens for Commons would not be a necessary party. If the Court does not compel Plaintiffs to implead all in-land 887994 4 -4853- property interests in Dreamwood, then, necessarily, the third prong of the Blanding test above would be satisfied. C. The Disposition of John M. Anderson~ et al. v. City of Mound~ et al., Without the Inclusion of the In-land Landowners as Parties, Will Impair Their Ability to Protect Their Interests in the Wiota Common. The Plaintiffs in this action, the owners of lots in the Dreamwood Development which abut Lake Minnetonka and include the Wiota Common, are attempting to do away with any and all rights that the in-land owners of Dreamwood have regarding the Common without naming them as Defendants in this action. The Plaintiffs have couched their action in terms of there being no public interest in the Common, but, by the public, it is clear that they include the in- land homeowners of Dreamwood. The Wiota Common was dedicated by the original owners of Dreamwood, John D. Chipman and Jesse Chipman, as an area to be used by all homeowners within the development, including the in-land owners. The Common has been used over the years by the in-land homeowners, as a way to gain access to their docks, and also, as a place from which the riparian rights of the abutters are not absolute, but allow for docks to be placed out from the Common. In its Complaint, the Plaintiffs request that the Court enjoin the ability of the in-land owners from having docks on Wiota Common. Plaintiffs also allege that as Wiota Common is not what they would consider a "street," and because the private easement to Wiota Commons was allegedly only for use as a street, the in-land owners have no right to set foot on the Common. If not allowed to intervene, the in-land homeowners will not have a chance to protect their interests in the CommOn. A%0rdingly, Citizens for Commons, representing the ~'i~d' hOmeowners, should as a matter of right be allowed to intervene and assert the rights of its members. 887994 5 -4854- D. The In-land Owners Interests are Not Adequately Represented by the Existing Parties. The in-land homeowners of Dreamwood's interests are not adequately represented by Defendant City of Mound. The City's interest in the Common relates principally to whether it can continue to license docks there and charge corresponding licensing fees. This interest is markedly different than that of an in-land homeowner's interest in maintaining the right, as an owner in the Dreamwood Development, to have access to the Lake through the Wiota Common. The City of Mound has recognized in its Answer that the action brought by the Plaintiffs has failed to include all indispensable parties affected by the action. However, this affirmative defense does not in any way mean that the interests and concerns of the in-land homeowners, as represented by Citizens for Commons, are being actively and thoroughly represented in this lawsuit by the City of Mound, as alleged by Plaintiffs. The City of Mound and the Citizens for Commons have distinctly different interests in the Wiota Common that need to be defended and protected in this lawsuit. IV. CONCLUSION Citizens for Commons has clearly demonstrated that it satisfies the requirements for intervention as a matter of right in this matter; moreover, Minn. R. Civ. P. 24 should be liberally construed. Engelrup at 166, 224 N.W.2d at 489. The rule is designed precisely for cases such as this, where intervention is necessary to protect non-parties from having their interests adversely affected by litigation conducted without their participation. Erickson, 409 N.W.2d at 887994 6 -4855- 887. Citizens for Commons respectfully requests that the Court issue an Order granting its Motion to intervene. Dated: ~-'¢-/ ,2002 RIDER, BENNETT, EGAN & ARUNDEL, LLP Attomeys for Citizens for Commons Association 333 South Seventh Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 340-8911 887994 7 -4856- GEORGE C. HOFF HOFF~ BARRY & KUDERER PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION DIRECT (952) 746-2706 e-mail ghoff~hbklaw.com October 10, 2002 District Court Administrator Hennepin County Government Center 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 ATTENTION: CIVIL FILING Re: John M. Anderson, et al v. City of Mound Court File No. MC 02-011148 Our File No. 3200-150 Dear Administrator: Please find enclosed with this for filing the City of Mound's Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Citizens For Commons Association's Motion To Intervene in the above-captioned matter. By copy of this letter, the same has been served upon counsel of record. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER, P.A. cc: Marc D. Simpson, Esq. Timothy J. Nolan, Esq. John Dean 160 FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER 775 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 (952) 941-9220 FAX (952) 941-7968 1-800-989-9220 -4857- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL Barbara A. Johnson, being first duly sworn, on oath, deposes and says that on the 10~h day of October, 2002, she served the following: City's Of Mound's Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Citizens For Commons Association's Motion To Intervene by mailing a true and correct copy thereof to: Marc D. Simpson Leonard Street and Deinard Suite 2300 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Timothy J. Nolan Rider Bennett Egan & Arundel Suite 2000 33 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, by depositing the same in the post office at Eden Prairie, Minnesota. Subscribed and swom to before me this l0th day of October, 2002. --'"~/~ arbara A. Notary Public -4858- STATE oF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT John M. Anderson, Kelly M. Anderson Robert J. Beissel, Philip L. Bowman, Julie N. Bowman, Michael R. Gardner, Susan G. Gardner, Aaron S. Gross, Melissa S. Gross, Jeffrey J. Jesberg, Thomas R. Menken, Bonita J. Menken, Matthew J. Mizerny, John E. Mundt, Robert E. Riebe, Sharron L. Riebe, and Jason S. Sasanfar, Plaintiffs Vo City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation; the unknown heirs of John D. Chipman, deceased and the unknown heirs of Jesse Chipman, deceased, Defendants, and Citizens for Commons Association, a non profit neighborhood association, Applicant for Intervention. Case Type: Other Civil Court File No: MC 02-011148 Honorable Catherine L. Anderson CITY OF MOUND'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF CITIZENS FOR COMMONS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO INTERVENE I. INTRODUCTION Citizens for Commons Association ("Citizens for Commons"), by notice of motion and motion dated October 1, 2002, moved this court for an order allowing it to intervene in the above-captioned lawsuit pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 24.01. This matter is set for hearing before this Court on October 21, 2002, at 1:15 p.m. For the reasons and on the basis set forth herein, MOT INTERVENE memo 1 -4859- the City of Mound ("City") submits this memorandum in support of Citizens for Commons' Motion to Intervene in this matter. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS The City concurs in the Statement of Facts as set forth in Citizens for Commons' Memorandum of Law dated October 1, 2002. III. PURSUANT TO MINN. R. CIV. P. 24.01, CITIZENS FOR COMMONS IS ENTITLED TO INTERVENE IN THIS ACTION. Minn. R. Civ. P. 24.01, entitled "Intervention of Right," states as follows: Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action when an applicant's claim or defense and the main action have a common question of law or fact. When a party to an action relies for ground of claim or defense upon any statute or executive order administered by a federal or state government officer or agency or upon any regulation, order, requirement, or agreement issued or made pursuant to the statute or executive order, the officer or agency upon timely application may be permitted to intervene in the action. In exercising its discretion, the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the fights of the original parties. The rule sets up a four-part test that a non-party must meet in order to intervene as a matter of fight: (1) timely application for intervention; (2) an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action; (3) circumstances demonstrating that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the party's ability to protect that interest; and (4) a showing that the party is not adequately represented by the existing parties. Minneapolis Star & Tribune v. Schumacher, 392 N.W.2d 197, 207 (Minn. 1986). The rule, written to "encourage all legitimate interventions," should be "liberally applied" by the courts. Gruman v. Hendrickson, 416 N.W.2s 497, 500 (Minn. 1987) (citing Engelrup v. Potter, 224 N.W.2d 484, 489 (1974). "Rule 24 is designed to protect nonparties from having MOT INTERVENE memo 2 -4860- their interests adversely affected by litigation conducted without their participation." /d. (citing Erickson v. Bennett, 409 N.W.2d 884, 887 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). Moreover, for purposes of judicial economy, Citizens for Commons is an appropriate party in this lawsuit. If denied an opportunity to protect its rights in this suit, the members of Citizens for Commons would by necessity be motivated to begin their own lawsuit or lawsuits. No party's interest would be served through serial litigation of the issues involved in this dispute. Citizens for Commons meets all four criteria for intervention of right and its motion to intervene in this matter should be granted. A. Citizens for Commons made a timely motion to intervene. An application to intervene must be timely. Minn.R.Civ. P. 24.01. The timeliness of a motion to intervene depends on the "particular circumstances involved and such factors as how far the suit has progressed, the reason for any delay in seeking intervention, and any prejudice to the existing parties because of a delay." Minneapolis Star & Tribune, 392 N.W.2d at 207. Plaintiffs have not asserted and could not assert that Citizens for Commons' motion is untimely. Plaintiffs served their Summons and Complaint on July 3, 2002. The City served its Answer on July 26, 2002. Citzens for Commons filed its Notice of Intervention on July 31, 2002. The parties have not experienced any delay in this matter as a result of the motion to intervene and their has been no prejudice to any party as a result of the motion. B. Citizens for Commons' members claim an interest in the property, the Wiota Common, which is the subject of the litigation. The party seeking to intervene must show an interest relating to the "property or transaction" which is the subject of the action. Minn.R.Civ. P. 24.01. Members of Citizens for Commons, inland property owners in the Dreamwood development, claim an interest in the MOT INTERVENE memo 3 -4861 - property that is the subject of the lawsuit.~ The Plaintiffs, lakeshore property owners in the Dreamwood development, claim that they own the Wiota Common in fee simple. Citizens for Commons claims the Wiota Common is public or quasi-public in nature due to the original grant establishing the Dreamwood development and that its members have an interest in the property. Members of Citizens for Commons have a significant interest in the property that is the subject of this litigation. C. Resolution of this matter without Citizens for Commons' involvement will impair its members' ability to protect their interest in Wiota Common. Rule 24.01 contemplates intervention of right where a parties' ability to protect its rights may be impaired or impeded by disposition of the action. Without naming any of the inland owners of property in the Dreamwood development as defendants in this lawsuit, the Plaintiffs are attempting to eliminate any right those inland property owners have in the Wiota Common area. The members of Citizens for Commons have an interest in the Wiota Common as established by the initial dedication of the property in 1907. That dedication included the Wiota Common, as an area to be used by all homeowners within the development, including the inland property owners. The Wiota Common has been used for years by the inland residents of the Dreamwood development to access to their docks. Plaintiffs' suit seeks to eliminate that right without giving the Citizens for Commons an opportunity to protect it. If Citizens for Commons, on behalf of the inland property owners, is not allowed to intervene in this action, those property owners may lose their chance to protect their interests in the Wiota Common. ~ Minn. Stat.§ 540.151 permits an organization to act on behalf of its members in litigation. Citizens for Commons has representative standing for the inland property owners because (a) the inland property owners would have standing to intervene in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to its purpose; and (c) neither the claims asserted nor the relief requested requires the individual members of Citizens for Commons to participate in the suit. See Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., 373 N.W.2d 784, 790 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985), aff'd 389 N.W.2d 205 (Minn. 1986). MOT INTERVENE memo 4 -4862- D. The existing parties do not adequately represent Citizens for Commons' interest in the litigation. Rule 24.01 acknowledges that parties are entitled to adequate representation when their rights are jeopardized in litigation. The City's interest in this litigation involves utility lines, street access and a dock licensing program, but does not encompass the individual real estate interests asserted by the Citizens for Commons in its Memorandum of Law. The City's interest and the Citizens for Commons' interest in this matter are entirely distinct. Citizens for Commons, as representative for its members, is a proper and necessary party to this litigation to insure that its distinct interests are adequately represented. IV. CONCLUSION Citizens for Commons has met the four-part test for intervention of right established by Minn. R. Civ. P. 24.01. Citizens for Commons made a timely application, its members have an identifiable interest in the property in dispute, its interests are distinct from any other parties' interests, and those interests may be impaired if the litigation proceeds without its members' participation. Given Rule 24.0 l's purpose of encouraging all legitimate interventions, and that Citizens for Commons has met its requirements, the City respectfully request that this Court grant Citizens for Commons' motion to intervene. Dated this [ O4'~day of October, 2002. ~rge C. Hoff (#458465' Justin L. Templin (#305807) HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER, P.A. 775 Prairie Center Drive 160 Flagship Corporate Center Eden Prairie, MN 55344 tel: (952) 941-9220 fax: (952) 941-7968 MOT INTERVENE memo 5 -4863- LEN HARRELL Chief of Police TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 Kandis Hanson Acting Chief John McKinley Monthly Report for September, 2002 STATISTICS, The the month of There were 2 Criminal 4 Burglaries, 12 There forgery/NSF, 9 criminal violations, 6 2 10 other ~ffe~es; : The patroI divls!on,!~s~efi t00 ~!jlt citlttlons ~d 7 juvenile .... citations. Parking ~iafion~ ~ for ~ddifi6~ 9 tickets. Wamings were issued t° 56 g f0i ~ varietv'~vi°lafiofigl : There wa~ 1' ~d~f~st~d'f0Z a fe!o~*ffens~pd 24 adults and 4 juveniles ~e~ted.f°t ~mi~emean°~s~.:[~e'Wer~*:~isdemeanor adult and 2 offenses include 2 property, 1 narcotics, 7 liquor law domestics (6 with assaults), and The with injuries). There Mound assisted requested assistance on3 -4864- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - September, 2002 II. INVESTIGATIONS Investigations on 3 criminal sexual conduct cases, 3 burglaries, 1 identity theft case and 1 adult protection case accounted for 62.75 hours of investigative time. Other cases investigated included theRs, sex offender registration, forgery, stolen vehicle, assaults, personal injury accident and recovery of a stolen vehicle, damage to property and mutual aid given in a pursuit situation. Formal complaints were issued for Gross Misdemeanor Domestic Assault, Interfering with a 911 Call, 2na Degree Gross Misdemeanor DUI, Over .10bac, Minor Consumption of Alcohol, Gross Misdemeanor Fail to Obtain a Contractors License, Fail to Obtain a Building Permit, Theft, yd Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct, 3rd Degree Assault, 4th Degree DUI, 5th Degree Assault, Expired License Tabs and Disorderly Conduct. III. PERSONNEL/STAFFING Michael Sussman is progressing very well in the Field Training Officer program. Michael's past experience and knowledge has facilitated his rapid progression. Officers used approximately 55.5 hours of overtime during the month of September. Officers used nearly 24 hours of comp- time, 44.5 hours of sick time, and 180 hours of vacation. Officers earned 59.62 hours of comp time. IV. TRAINING Officer Dan Niccum has been assigned as the School Resource Officer (SRO). Part of Dan's job as the SRO is to teach DARE. Dan began his two week DARE instructor training this month and will complete it the first week of October. Sgt. Swensen went attended some update training in the use of K-9. The entire department attended training in both defensive tactics and legal update. There was a department shoot in September as well. V. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER Zach was able to spend about one week with Jen Williams before Jen left for school in late August. Since that time Zach has been doing a good job as the Community Service Officer. In September Zach responded to 25 animal complaints, 54 ordinance violations and 171 miscellaneous calls for service. Three citations were issued by Zach during the month. -4865- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - September, 2002 VI. RESERVES The reserves donated 142.5 hours to the community in September. The unit currently has eight active who contribute on a regular basis. -4866- Metropolitan Council Building communities that work Environmental Services September 30, 2002 Ms. Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1687 Subject: Status of Construction Cooperation Agreement Lift Station L25 Relocation Project Dear Ms. Hanson: We would like to take this opportunity to notify you of the current status of the Construction Cooperation Agreement for the relocation of MCES Lift Station L25. On July 18th, we'met with Hasbro, Inc, CorP0rate Environmental Services Director, John Gallucci, Hasbro's consultant, Don Richard of B arr Engineering, and John Cameron. :: Subsequently, we have discussed constructability and environmental issues with our consultant, Howard R. Green and Associates, our General Counsel, and the MPCA. STS Consultants is currently finalizing the results of our Phase II Environmental Assessment work. Additional work will be required to better characterize the conditions adjacent to the MCES interceptor. The issues that remain to be resolved before the Metropolitan Council can finalize the Construction Cooperation Agreement are as follows: · The location proposed by the City of Mound for the proposed lin station influent sewer crosses an area of solvent contaminated groundwater. Construction in this area poses a risk of escalated construction costs due to the potential site hazards and long- term liability as a potentially responsible party if it is ever shown that site conditions are adversely changed. Previous investigations by Barr have indicated that the contaminant plume emanating from the former Hasbro facility follows the MCES interceptor to the west. Accordingly, the MPCA has interpreted the supeffund site boundaries as potentially including the interceptor 'facility and advised the Metropolitan Council to prepare documents for review by the VIC program staff prior to any work. The scope of the · , involvement with~the MPCA in conducting environmental investigation work necessary to obtain letters of assurance is unknown at this time. ,..: ....... · The proposed lift station parcel is downgradient to the area of solvent contaminated groundwater. Due to the deep nature (approximately 65 feet) of the proposed www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602-1888 230 East Fifth Street · St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 · (651) 602-1005 * Fax 602-1138 · TTY 229-3760 An Equl_ 4867-~:~Y~ Ms. Kandis Hanson Page 2 constructed wet well, groundwater pumping for the purposes of construction dewatering may cause adverse migration of contaminated groundwater and lead to long-term liability for the adverse pollution. Preliminary investigation conducted by others has potentially discovered chlorinated solvents in shallow groundwater at various locations West of Belmont Lane. This will likely be a factor in selection of an appropriate connection point to the existing interceptor and the routing of downstream facilities. As was discussed with you in the August 16th meeting, it is the preference of the Metropolitan Council to evaluate all options for relocation of both the lift station and the connecting influent sewer or potentially constructing a gravity sewer to replace the lift station and associated forcemain. We would like to investigate alternatives that work within your development plans and reduce the liability of the proposed construction adjacent to the former Hasbro site. Since the meeting, 'we have received from John Cameron a map denoting potential city properties that may be considered for alternate interceptor alignments. We are also looking forward to the completion of the County's initial Phase II Environmental' Assessment work for the proposed roadway realignment. We are anticipating that results of this investigation work may be available by late this fall. We would also appreciate an opportunity to review the results of the City's additional environmental investigation work and latest development plans. We expect that once the City and County have collected sufficient environmental investigation data and development plans are available, we will be able to better evaluate our alternatives and understand the project requirements. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact Adam Gordon at (651) 602-4508. Yours truly, Bill Moeller, P.E. Assistant General Manager CC: Scott Dentz Jeanne Matross Adam Gordon Doug Tholo (HRG) -4868- 07/02 ~{ED 08:45 FAX 402 362 6727 C NABER + ASSOCIATe5 ~v~ 4510.00 Insurance 4520.00 Pmts In Lieu Of Tax 4540.00 Emp. Benefit Contr Total General Exp. Total Routine Exp. 4610.~3 Extra Maint Cont. 4620.03 Casualty Loss Contract 4620.04 Casualty Loss Proceeds Total Nonroutine Exp. TOTAL EXPENSES Mound, MN Public Housing BUDGET PROGRESS REPORT CONTINUED Y'I'D Balance 5,388.3~ 3,576.12 '~ 3,131.02 ~2,095.47 ~42,282.3Q 668,00 127,548.99 (140.648.59) (~2,431.60) 129.850,70 Budget 4,470.00 4,190.00 3,990.00 12,6S0.Q0 129,3~6.00 0.00 0,00 ~.o0 129,326.00 Percent Of Budqet t21.00 85.00 78.00 96.00 110.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 100.00 % % % % -4869- CenterPoint,. Minnegasco Arnold (Ame) R. Hendrickson Senior Consultant Local Government Relations 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, M N 55402-2006 Tel: 612 321 5375 Fax: 012 321 5137 arnold.r, hendrickson @CenterPointEnergy, com 800 LaSalle Avenue PO Box 59038 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0038 October 1, 2002 We're now CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd Mound MN 55364 Dear Ms. Hanson: On October 1, 2002, we changed our company's name from Reliant Energy Minnegasco to CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco. We made this change because our parent company, Rehant Energy, spht into two separate businesses. Minnegasco is now one of three gas distribution companies that are part of CenterPoint Energy, whose business focus is energy delivery. For more information, please refer to our enclosed news release. We changed our name, not our comm{tment. We're the same, trusted company that has been a vital part of growing Minnesota communities since 1870. Our new name reflects our continued commitment to put our customers' comfort, convenience and safety at the center of everything we do. You can still reach us at the same addresses and telephone numbers you used in the past. My personal e'mail, however, has changed to arnold.hendrickson@CenterPointEnergy.com. An updated phone list is also enclosed, to make contacting us as easy and convenient as possible. For more information about CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco and the products, programs and services we provide, visit our new Web site at www.minuegasco. CenterPointEnergy.com. We care about the safety, comfort and peace of mind of our customers. You can count on us to continue that commitment in the years ahead. Sincerely, Arne Hendrickson Local Government Relations 612-321'5375 Eno. -4870- The Gillespie Gazette VOL X NO 10 October - 2002 PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE September 19, 2002 Dear Members and Friends, We are into the Fall Season and because of all the rain we have received, everbching is still very green. I saw in the Star-Tribune that Lake Minnetonka hit all all-time high water level. Some people on Minnehaha Creek think the Watershed District is letting too much water flow through the Gray's Bay Dam. Some homeowners on Lake Minnetonka think they aren't letting enough water flow from the lake. Nature's balance is certainly fragile. We have many wonderful programs and activities going on at our Center. We have a work activity going on in our in our Meisel Room which doesn't get the publicity and thanks it deserves. Old newspapers are collected and prepared so that Meisel Hardware Specialties can use them for packaging. This is a fundraiser for our Center. This work is done on Mondays and Wednesdays and Fridays from 8:00 am to 11:30 am. At the present time, the workers are: Mary Malcheski, M~rgaret Mattson, Henry Ebert, Betty Strong, Alma Quist, Gene Partyka, Elta Erickson, Marilyn Byrnes, Harlan Dugstad, Don Pedersen, Jim Regan, Earl Taylor and Dean and Muriel Lattin (on leave). We also appreciate those of you who bring in the newspapers for recycling. Thanks, crew. With the 'additional day, they could certainly use a little assistance. Please consider helping for an hour or two. Coffee is cheerfully provided and treats are thanks to our terrific "cookie-maker", Chuck LeGault. Both younger seniors and older seniors can do this kind of work. Our latest fundraiser was our BBQ Dinner on August 14~. We had a delicious dinner and wonderful entertainment. A big "THANK YOU" to those who helped make this an enjoyable evening. Our next fundraiser will be a Grilled Pork Chop Dinner to be held on Friday, October 11~. This should be a fun evening for all. We will need volunteers to help with this dinner. Please call Co-Chairs Mary Ellen Storline at 952- 472-3420 or Barb Calhoun at 952-472-6152. For some time now, we have been looking for people to run for the Gillespie Center Advisory Council. We will be voting for Council Members in November. We would like to see a few more people willing to run for these positions. There will be 15 members on this Advisory Council. These Advisory Council positions do require giving of time and effort on the part of Advisory Council persons. We are expected to attend two meetings a month, and to volunteer for most fundraising events. This is a commitment those of us who are on the Advisory Council have been willing to make and a commitment we hope others are willing to make. If you are interested in having your name added to the ballot, please call me at 952-471-9017, Dotty O'Brien at the Center or Marry Garvais at 952-472-1882. Jack Weist Chairperson Gillespie Center Advisory Council -4871 - GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 203 No~h LaSalle Street, Suite 2700, Chicago, Illinois 60601-1210 312/97~9700 · Fax: 312/97~4806 September 20, 2002 For information contact: NEWS RELEASE Stephen Gauthier (312) 977-9700 (Chicago)--The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Finan- cial Reporting has been awarded to: City of Mound, MN by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) . The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplish- ment by a government and its management. An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual(s), department or agency designated by the government as primarily responsible for preparing the'award- winning CAFR. This has been presented to: Gino Businaro, Finance Director The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program including demonstrating a construc- tive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR. The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving approximately 14,000 government finance professionals with offices in Chicago, Illinois, and Washington, D.C. WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 350, Washington, DC 20006 202/429-2750 · Fax: 202/429-2755 -4872- Hennepin County Memo DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 17, 2002 Urban Hennepin County Cooperating Communities rk Hendrickson CDBG Project Status Report Accompanying are the July and August 2002 CDBG Project Status Reports (PSR~) Three quarterly status reports for the period ending 6-30-02 are enclosed for Single Family Rehab programs administered by the County. If you need information before then please contact Jim Graham at 612-348-2235 or by email- j ames. graham~co.hennepin.mn.us. Updates: · HUD notified the county of the award of FY2002 entitlement funds for the CDBG, HOME & ESGP programs and the grant agreements have been executed. · The FY2002 projects and budgets are included in the July PSR. Please review the information for 'four city and let us know as soon as possible of any inaccuracies. · The Consolidated Plan performance report (CAPER) for the program year ending June 30, 2002 has been completed and is available for public comment until September 20, 2002. The County Board will hold a public hearing on the report on September 24th. The final report will be submitted to HUD on September 27th. The Executive Summary is available on the county web site at- http://www.co.hennepin.mn.us/tcw/housing/welcome.html · The FY2003-05 Joint Cooperation Agreement has been submitted to HUD. Expenditure Goals: The July Project Status Report includes FY2002 projects & funding along with new expenditure goals. Please check the expenditure goals (housing rehab and other projects) for your city and assess your ability to meet this goal by May 1, 2003. Also, FY2000 budget balances for committed funds must be expended and reimbursement requested no later than December 1, 2002. Any unexpended funds will be recaptured. FY2001 funds must be expended by June 30, 2003. This schedule is consistent with current agreements. Please contact your CDBG representative as soon as possible if you plan to reprogram any funds. Government Accounting Requirements & Timely Submission of Reimbursement Requests: We need to receive city warrant (reimbursement) requests in a timely manner. Warrants need to be submitted within 60-days following the city expenditure of funds. If your finance department has any questions, please call Chuck Warrington at 612-348-2683. Enclosure Housing, Community Works & Transit 417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1362 612-348-9710 -4873- Z oo ~> ~<'~ -4874- October 15, 2002 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com US Postal Service Denver FSO 4th Floor 8055 East Tufts Avenue Parkway Denver, CO 80237-2881 Re: Property at 5501 Shoreline Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota To Whom It May Concem: I am writing this letter to provide you with information concerning the conditions for the continued occupancy of 5501 Shoreline by the USPS. As you know, the postal facility lease for the premises expired on September 30, 2002. Due to the fact that Mound can defer the demolition of the building at 5501 Shoreline for a limited period without impaction on the timing of construction of the new improvements planned for 5501 Shoreline, it is willing to permit the USPS to continue to occupy the site until not later than December 15, 2002. Mound has contractual obligations to third parties that require Mound to be assured of possession to the property by that date. During such period, all of the economic terms that were contained in the expired lease will be applied as will all of the other provisions contained in the expired lease except that Mound will have no obligation to repair, maintain or replace the premises, and except that such application will not be construed to create any right in the USPS to extend its occupancy of the premises beyond December 15, 2002, even if the new facility is not ready for occupancy by that date, unless Mound agrees in writing to permit continued possession beyond such date. On the assumption that this arrangement is acceptable to the USPS, Mound will accept the rent payment recently received as payment of rent for the period October 1, 2002 through October 31, 2002. If you have any questions about this matter, or wish to discuss it further, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, ~Kan~lis M.~ Mound City Manager Cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Mound Post Master JBD-221728v 1 MU220-1 _printed on recycled paper 4875-