The URL can be used to link to this page

2002-11-26 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 6Ostl qual{~ ~e~ice~ ~at ?Spofid to the needg of all eitizensi fosiering a safe; attractive MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2002 - 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE o APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: NOV 12, 2002 REGULAR MEETING *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 5109-5112 5113-5138 *C. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION ON CASE #02-38: TOM AND TARA STOKES 5201 WATERBURY ROAD VARIANCE 5139-5140 *D. *E. *F. *G. *H. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT (#Al 4569) WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY REGARDING ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED DATA BASE (EPDB) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT. APPROVE ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSE APPLICATIONS FOR CARBONE' S PIZZERIA APPROVE INTERIM ORDINANCE TO REGULATE ADULT USES IN THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #3 FOR POST INDICATOR LINES ON METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ACTION ON THE FINAL ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2002 - MOUND VISIONS SECOND ADDITION 5141-5143 5144-5149 5150-5157 5158-5161 5162-5165 o PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) REQUEST FOR DEVELOPERS FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS (BACKGROUND INFORMATION IN HRA PACKET) CONSIDERATION/ACTION ON LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING FIRE SERVICE BETWEEN CITIES OF MOUND AND MINNETRISTA · 5166-5167 o ° 10. DISCUSSION/ACTION ON DRAFT #2 STREET RECONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT POLICIES ACTION ON CHANGE ORDER #1 TO 2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - COTTONWOOD LANE/DAKOTA RAIL STORM SEWER INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Correspondence: Mound Westonka Schools B. Newsletter: Metropolitan Council C. Newsletter: Hennepin County Sheriff's Dept D. Report: Public Safety Facility E. Newsletter: Ehler's Advisor F. Correspondence: LMCD G. Newsletter: Xcel Energy H. Notice: Met Council Infiltration and Inflow Meetings I. LMCC Dec 2092 calendar J. Letter: Gillespie Center K. Report: Finance Dept though Oct 2002 L. FYI: Correspondences with the City of Orono 5168-5179 5180-5196 5197-5206 5207-5210 5211-5214 5215-5218 5219-5222 5223-5234 5235-5238 5239-5246 5247-5249 5250 5251-5253 5254-5259 11. ADJOURN This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. ci~, ofmozmd com. More current meeting COUNCIL BRIEFING November 26, 2002 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Nov 25 - 6:30 - CC special meeting - Budget Nov 26 - 7:00 - HRA regular meeting Nov 26 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Nov 28 & 29 - Closed for Thanksgiving Dec 2 - 7:00 - Special meeting for Truth in Taxation and other business Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec 6 - 12:00 -1:30 - Root Beer Float Birthday Lunch 9 - 7:00 - Continuation for Truth in Taxation and other business, if needed 10 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting 10 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting 24 & 25 - Closed p.m. of 24th and all day Dec 25, for Christmas Absences Dec 11-18 Dec 19-24 Kandis Hanson Kandis Hanson Surgery Telecommute part-time from home, as recovery allows Human Resources We took in about 45 aps for Liquor Store Manager. Those with actual experience managing a liquor store were shown preference. Assistant Manager Julie Luedke and I held seven mini-interviews on Thurs. Each candidate also took a written test consisting of math and subjective questions. We narrowed the pool to four and those finalists will participate in a ½ day event, consisting of lunch at Happy Garden, a tour of the downtown, and one-hour interviews each. The top one or two candidates will be subject to psychological testing to learn if they have the leadership skills necessary to hold this important position. The Liquor Store should have a new manager in place in January, in time for a move in early February. Brimeyer and Associates was contacted following the decision to continue the Police Chief hiring process. Jim recategorized the 65 applications based on the discussions of the Interview Team. Mayor Pat Meisel, Minnetonka Police Chief Joy Rikala and I are now screening the stacks to cull out suitable candidates. Following the back grounding by Brimeyer's firm and further narrowing of the candidates, the two day interview process will be repeated with up to five more candidates. There have been some shows of support for the intemal candidates in both the Police Department and the Liquor Store. It has always been my attitude that simply holding a position in a department or having the longest tenure in a department does not qualify individuals for a position of highest responsibility. In fact, am aware of numerous examples, in both the public and private sectors, to the contrary. I do believe, however, that if the internal candidate is, indeed, the best possible person for the job that person will rise to the top in the process and legitimately earn the position. Other Hermepin County engineering is holding a public meeting at City Hall the morning of Dec 3, to meet with property owners affected by the County Road 15 project. Employees and their families under the City's health insurance program are being offered flu shots at a clinic at City Hall on Nov 26. Neighboring cities have committed to participating, making the local clinic possible, and at a very reasonable cost to the participants. Tom Stokes, et al, is scheduled to attend the Redevelopment Proiect Team meeting on Nov 27 so staff may hear their project plans and assist in moving the projects forward. Many and repeated efforts have been made by staff up to this point to bring about the upcoming meeting. Following the Truth in Taxation Hearing on Dec 2, there will be a one-hour presentation on the public safety building project, intended to bring all the stake holders up to date on the project. Included among those invited are police and fire staff and their families, retired firefighters and their spouses, police reservists, city staff and council. The presentation will be among the listed agenda items on the Dec 2 meeting agenda. The Nov 13 date to move into the new Liquor Store has come and gone. I am experiencing a rash of missed attempts by the developer, Brian Pellowski, to talk about what may be expected. It is my expectation, now, that we will move into the new store in early Feb. That target date gets us past out busy seasons - the holidays, inventory and Super Bowl. It will also be right in time for the new manager to provide some help and guidance. Lastly, there is a provision in our agreement that the developer will pay for our rents to our current landlord for time in the existing locating after Nov 15. Staff will be pursuing that reimbursement as a matter of course. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER '12, 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, Acting City Manager Gino Businaro, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Engineer John Cameron, Police Chief John McKinley, Zach Petz, Earl Petz and family, Tom & Tara Stokes, Mike Mueller, Pam Weatherhead, Randy Beurets, Barry DeSmet, Collette Roberts, Jodi Rahn, Deb Grand, Ann Eberhart, Tom Hoff. ~:~!iiiiii~!iiiiii? Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Age~i~i=~,~considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call ~°~i~ Th=~i!==~ill be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember.,=e~?~/tizen so ~ests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda an~?,!~Onside~ed in noY~al sequence. Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order a~ii~30 p.m. '~::=:~:~,: Me~t~dition;iii~iii~'~2A, ~!~i~i~g ~ek MOTION to A, in 4. SWEARING INi~iPATROL~:'i6;FFICER ZACH PET7 City Manager Kandis R~/~son S~::i-e in Patrol Office Zach Petz and members of the Council and the community welC~i~ed=:~::~m to the Mound Police Department. 5. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve Minutes: October 22, 2002 regular meeting; October 24, 2002 special meeting; October 28, 2002 special meeting; and October 28, 2002 special meeting. B. Approve Payment of Claims in the amount of $693,316.28. C. Payment Requests for Improvement Projects: Payment Request #2 from Buffalo Bituminous for Westedge Improvement Project in the amount of $131,692.43. Payment Request #2 from Dave Perkins Contracting for 2002 Storm Sewer Project in the amount of $90,343.77. 1 - 5109- Mound City Council Minutes - November 12, 2002 3. Payment Request #1 from Sunram's for the 2002 Retaining Wall Project in the amount of $48,430.38. D. Deny request for parking on both sides of Balsam Road E. Approve cancellation of special meeting of November 21,2002. F. RESOLUTION NO. 02-'107: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION AS PRESENTED, AS THE CANVASS OF VOTE FOR THE NOVEMBER 5, 2002 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION G. Approve Memorandum of Understanding between the City, Mound HRA and Mueller- Lansing Properties. H. RESOLUTION NO. 02-'108: RESOLUTION APPROVING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DECK AT 4640 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE. BLOCK 3, LOTS '16 & 17, DEVON. P&Z CASE #02-40..:,~;~iiiBID #30.117-23-22-0019. 6. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM ClTIZENS.~:~S.ENT ON ANY ITEM NOT 7. PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENT TO THE!~i~INESS S~iliDY CRITERIA Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 7:40 Pii~i~. ..... ~¢Iii!? .... City Attorney John Dean stated that this dment'*~,.,~discussed and adopted earlier this evening by the HRA and these .,,,...... changes in state statute. Upon no public comment being he~ the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. MOTION by Brown, seconde¢ Motion carried. following resolution. All voted in favor. RESOLUTION NO. CRITERIA ~,~iiii¢i?' .... MOTION by Osmek, Motion carded. ADOPTING AMENDED BUSINESS SUBSIDY Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. RESOLUTION NO. 02-110: RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON AN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (COUNTY '15/2002 PROJECT) 9. WELL PROJECT City Engineer John Cameron informed the council that the municipal test well installation on Evergreen Road, done by Traut Wells, totaled $24,780.00, Which is significantly higher than the bid amount of $13,264. Cameron explained that because of the water quantity that they were trying to obtain, the drilling process had to be extended to 309 feet, which doubled the depth in the original proposal. Most of the extra cost is for this greater depth and includes some related items such as the screen required for the test pumping. The decision on 2 -5110- Mound City Council Minutes - November 12, 2002 proceeding with the drilling of the test well had to be made at the time or the cost would have been even higher. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve payment to Traut Wells for $24,780.00. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 10. OLD POST OFFICE DEMOLITION Cameron presented the nine bids received for the old post office demolition. They ranged from $34,991.50 to a high of $80,901.00. Cameron added that completion date will be 30 days from start of work. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to award the contract ~;;~Wickenhauser Excavating of Cologne, MN, for the Post Office Demolition, in the amount,~¢'~'~34,991.50. All voted in favor. Motion Carried ~ii~i?~?~?~!iiii~i!iiii~ .... 11. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION~? ...... '~:'::~'~'ii~ili?~ ?~i??~ .... A. Case #02-38: Tom & Tara Stokes - 5201 Wate~:~i"Y R~.ad - V~i~hce Sarah Smith reviewed the variance request to co~[~uct a~i!i;?Solid wood fence to be located on a portion of the front property line along TuxedcJ~ii~i:i~di!iii?~ursuant to code, front yard fences are allowed to be placed along propeAy lines as Iong"::~he do not exceed 4' n hei ht Smith stated that the Planning Commissio~?,:~B~S~.aff ha:~;~[ecommended denial of this Tom Stokes, along with his neighB~?~dre~:"the Council with concerns about their children's safety, headlights s~:~:~i~g int~gi:r h'~es, and privacy issues. The fence would buffer the sound and lights, a~:~rov:i~:':;;~::~a~ that they are seeking for their children, along Tuxedo Blvd which.is a Mike Mueller, Planni~om~ion'::~mber, addressed the council with concerns over se~ing precedent B::~ause ther~:~re m~ny busy streets in Mound with res dents that could pose the same conc~?:and ma~?similar requests. ':::::::::::2:::: Meyer asked Dean if thiS'::~Bi~?~et precedent, and Dean responded that the decision to grant a variance is fact driven and no ~o are exactly the same. To use this as a precedent someone would have to show that all of the impoAant elements in their case were exactly the same as found impodant in this case, and that would be unusual. Eve~ time the council looks at a variance the impoAant thing is to dete~ine if that request meets the requirements of the ordinance. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the variance and support it by having Staff insert the findings suggested into the resolution, which will appear on the next Council's consent agenda. Those voting in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. Those voting against: Meyer. Motion carried. Mayor Meisel called a recess at 9:07 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. 3 -5111- Mound City Council Minutes -November 12, 2002 12. DISCUSSION/ACTION ON ASSESSMENT POLICIES John Cameron presented a proposed assessment policy to the Council. Discussion followed regarding different scenarios that could arise from the proposed policies, and suggested various changes to the proposed policy. Cameron presented a map of the proposed street improvement project for next year, to occur out on Three Points. Bonnie Ritter asked that it be a matter of record that this is the first time that she has seen this proposed map, because of a property transaction that occurred in this area earlier in the year. It was the consensus of the Council to have Cameron make the suggested changes in the proposed policy, and bring a fresh copy back to the Council at their next meeting, based on unit charge rather than lineal foot charge, and separate the cQ~erciai/industrial into a t°ta y different policy. 12A. HOUSING WEEK Ueye~nce Governor Ventura's H~i'~'g W~ek to b'~i~i~i~.ld November 16-22, 2002 It's being initiated by Inner Faith Outreach~i~ spea~:eaded b 'Bob's Slee out People can contact him or WeCAN for more inform:~iD~??; 13, INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Correspondence: Mound Westonka Sc~ B. Update: Dreamwood lawsuit C. Correspondence: CenterPoir D. Newsletter: Lake Minnetor E. Report: Public Safety F. Correspondence: G. Report: Police De H. Newsletter: Gill~ I. Acknowled( Charitabi~ J. LMCC calendar K. Report: 2002 S Mil ~SSO( ~ncil :~:: er 2002 lasco g proceeds eanup days 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 10:10 p.m. carried. All voted in favor. Motion Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 4 -5112- NOVEMBER 26, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 111302S U E$182,253.28NOV 112002SU E $3,137.25 NOV 112602SUE $325,046.60NOV TOTAL $510,437.13 -5113- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 6:21 AM Page 1 Current Period: November 2002 Batch Name 111302SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $182,253.28 Posted Refer 111302 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Ck# 008820 11/13/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 952-472-0646 $18.80 Invoice 112302 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 952-472-3555 $2t5.21 invoice 110302 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 952-472-3093 $281.42 Invoice 112502 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells TELEPHONE MONTHLY $861.21 Invoice 112302 Transaction Date 11/7/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,376.64 Refer 112602 TRAUT WELLS Ck# 008824 11/13/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs NEW WELL/PUMPHOUSE $24,780.00 Invoice 093002 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $24,780.00 Refer 111302 PERKINS, DAVE CONTRACTING, I Ck#008822 11/13/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PAYMENT REQUEST #1 $154,923.51 Invoice 101602-B Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $154,923.51 Refer 111302 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Ck# 008821 11/13/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs JEFF PAUL DRIVEWAY PERMIT $50.00 Invoice 110102 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 111302 SPEEDWAYSUPERAMERICA (POL Ck#008823 11/13/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 10-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,123.13 Invoice 112002 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,123.13 Fund Summary BATCH Total $182,253.28 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Ma~uette Bank Mound $2,053.14 $215.21 $24,780.00 $154,923.51 $281.42 $182,253.28 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $182,253.28 $o.oo $182,253.28 -5114- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 8:21 AM Page 1 Current Period: November 2002 Batch Name 112002SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $3,137.25 Posted Refer 112002 FRONTIER/CITIZENSCOMMUNICA Ck#008836 11/20/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 472-3555 $196.63 Invoice 111002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 472-0646 $18.80 Invoice 111002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 472-0621 $767.19 Invoice 111002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 472-0635 $343.57 Invoice 111002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 472-0635 $343.57 Invoice 111002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 472-0635 $343.58 Invoice 111002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 472-0600 $861.21 Invoice 111002 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 112002 MOUND POST OFFICE Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage Invoice 112002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage Invoice 112002 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Tota I $2,874.55 Ck# 008837 11/20/2002 UTILITY BILLING $131.35 UTILITY BILLING $131.35 Total $262.70 BATCH Total $3,137.25 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $1,990.77 $196.63 $474.92 $474.93 $3,137.25 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $3,137.25 $o.o0 $3,137.25 -5115- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 1 Current Period: November 2002 Batch Name 112602SUE User Dollar Amt $325,046.60 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $325,046.60 Refer 112602 AMCON E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 11/12/2002 Cash Payment Invoice 2444 Transaction Date $0,00 In Balance 10-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $6,148.73 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6.148.73 Refer 112602 AMSTERDAM PRINTING Cash Payment MAILING LABELS $44,54 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment MAILING LABELS $44.54 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment MAILING LABELS $44.54 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment MAILING LABELS $44.54 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment MAILING LABELS $44,54 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment MAILING LABELS $14.85 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment MAILING LABELS $14.85 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MAILING LABELS $22.27 Invoice 5720679 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MAILING LABELS $22.26 Invoice 5720679 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $298.93 Refer 112602 ANTHONYSFLORAL Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous FUNERAL FLOWERS $35.00 Invoice 21011 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $35.00 Refer 112602 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $78.36 Invoice DC231710 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $62.40 Invoice DC230908 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $140.76 Refer 112602 ASPEN EMBROIDERYAND DESIG Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies EMBROIDER FOR CONSULTANT $23.11 Invoice 110402 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $23.11 Refer 112602 ASPEN EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts TRUCK #27 MOTOR $199.69 Invoice 764771 PO 17493 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $199.69 Refer 112602 AT&T E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies -5116- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 2 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 952-250-0429 $67.38 Invoice 102602 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 612-810-4029 $33.62 Invoice 103002 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $101.00 Refer 112602 BAKER ROAD SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR PLOW $224.27 Invoice 29611 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $224.27 Refer 112602 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,337.44 Invoice 25049100 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,818.75 Invoice 24991600 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,156.19 Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10-02 #1307149-10002-0200 $184.10 Invoice 1307149-10002-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10-02 #1307131-10002-0200 $31.66 Invoice 1307131-10002-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10-02 #1307131-10002-0200 $31.66 Invoice 1307131-10002-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10-02 #1307131-10002-0200 $31.67 Invoice 1307131-10002-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10-02 #1307032-10002-0200 $67.01 Invoice 1307032-10002-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10-02 #8003980-10002-0429 $17.76 Invoice 8003980-10002-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 10-02 MAiN STREET $20.39 Invoice 8003972-10002-0 Transaction, Date~ 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $384.25 Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic RECYCLING EVENT ROLLOFF $760.79 Invoice 10139650 Transaction Date 11/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $760.79 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials MINUS (CL5) $787.27 Invoice 103102 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials MINUS (CL2) -$563.22 Invoice 103102 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $224.05 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies UTILITY BILLS $356.73 Invoice 30117 lCash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies UTILITY BILLS $356.73 Invoice 30117 -5117- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 3 Cash Payment E 670-49500-210 Operating Supplies UTILITY BILLS $178.29 Invoice 30117 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs UTILITY BILLS $178.29 Invoice 30117 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,070.04 Refer 112602 CEMSTONE CONCRETE SOLUTIO Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts ELM ROAD AND IRONWOOD $337.87 Invoice 000340840 PO 17264 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $337.87 Refer 112602 CHADWlCK AND MERTZ Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 1-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $6,759.00 Invoice 110402 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,759.00 Refer 112602 CHAMPION AUTO Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply BLADES $18.08 Invoice D169043 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply FUEL LINE/FILTER $5.29 Invoice D171801 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery IGN COIL $21.29 Invoice DXXXX42 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $44.66 Refer 112602 CHIEFS POLICE ASSOC MINNESO Cash Payment E 101-42110-203 Printed Forms PERMITS TO ACQUIRE $40.83 Invoice 1185 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $40.83 Refer 112602 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $287,96 Invoice 61304056 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $287.96 Refer 112602 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs RETAINING WALL GALLWAY/SHANNON $980.00 Invoice 3979 Cash Payment E 281-45210-300 Professional Srvs 4625 IVD BOULDER $150.00 Invoice 10618 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,130.00 Refer 112602 CONCO, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 12-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $522.37 Invoice 112602 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 12-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $439.47 Invoice 112602 Transaction Date 11/21/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $961.84 Refer 112602 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs LEGAL ADS 10-25-02 $95.15 Invoice 2185939 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.15 Refer 112602 CRETE WORKS, INCORPORA TED -5118- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 4 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MAYWOOD/EAGLE LANE $550.00 Invoice 110102 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $550.00 Refer 112602 CY'S UNIFORMS Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous NAME TAGS $37.07 Invoice 12467 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous FLAGS $53.25 Invoice 14511 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Mou 10100 Total ~? 32Marquette Bank Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3.00 Invoice 192767-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $782.24 Invoice 199002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $18.40 Invoice 199011 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $863.70 Invoice 198296 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $16.90 Invoice 197477 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,367.00 Invoice 197469 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,051.24 Refer 112602 E-Z RECYCLING Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 11-02 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $7,700.00 Invoice 4409 Transaction Date 11/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,700.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $19.60 Invoice 323533 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,323.35 Invoice 323532 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.50 Invoice 323531 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,091.95 Invoice 320726 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,907.50 Invoice 320049 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $303.00 Invoice 319177 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,242.30 Invoice 317866 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.50 Invoice 317865 Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,974.70 112602 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $2,212.50 Invoice 20140 -5119- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 5 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 FIRE DEPT DRAFTS $187.50 Invoice 20141 Cash Payment E 455-46380~300 Professional Srvs 09-02 ASSESSMENT DISCUSSIONS $112.50 Invoice 20039 Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 HRA MEETING $300.00 Invoice 20040 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 09-02 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT $262.50 invoice 20040 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 09-02 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $862.50 Invoice 20040 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,937.50 Refer 112602 EXEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL, INC Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-06-02 DRUG TEST $18.00 Invoice 703895 Cash Payment $20.00 Invoice 703895 Cash Payment $38.00 Invoice 706734 Cash Payment $12.67 Invoice 706734 Cash Payment $12.67 Invoice 706734 Cash Payment $12.66 invoice 706734 Cash Payment $12.67 Invoice 706734 Cash Payment $12.67 Invoice 706734 Cash Payment $12.66 Invoice 706734 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total Refer 112602 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment Invoice 377386 Cash Payment Invoice 377386 Cash Payment Invoice 377386 Cash Payment Invoice 377386 Cash Payment Invoice 377386 Cash Payment Invoice 377386 Cash Payment Invoice 391237 Cash Payment Invoice 391235 E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-06-02 DRUG TEST E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic DRUG TESTS E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic DRUG TESTS E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic DRUG TESTS E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic DRUG TESTS E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic DRUG TESTS E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic DRUG TESTS E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic DRUG TESTS 10-29-02 UNIFORMS 10-29-02 UNIFORMS 10-29-02 UNIFORMS 10-29-02 MATS 10-29-02 MATS 10-29-02 MATS 11-12-02 MATS E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 222-42260-216 Cleaning S~Jpplies E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 11-12-02 MATS $152.00 $40.63 $4O.63 $40.62 $17.73 $17.73 $17.73 $42.43 $50.43 -5120- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11121102 10:10 AM Page 6 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 11-12-02 MATS $27.67 Invoice 391238 Cash Payment 10-22-02 UNIFORMS $34.94 Invoice 370400 Cash Payment 10-22-02 UNIFORMS $34.94 Invoice 370400 Cash Payment 10-22-02 UNIFORMS $34.93 Invoice 370400 Cash Payment 10-22-02 MATS $16.34 Invoice 370400 Cash Payment 10-22-02 MATS $16.34 invoice 370400 Cash Payment 10-22-02 MATS $16.34 Invoice 370400 Cash Payment 11-05-02 UNIFORMS $19.45 invoice 384256 Cash Payment 11-05-02 UNIFORMS $19.45 Invoice 384256 Cash Payment 11-05-02 UNIFORMS $19.45 Invoice 384256 Cash Payment 11-05-02 MATS $29.36 Invoice 384256 Cash Payment 11-05-02 MATS $29.36 Invoice 384256 Cash Payment 11-05-02 MATS $29,36 Invoice 384256 Cash Payment 11-12-02 UNIFORMS $17,57 Invoice 391234 Cash Payment 11-12-02 UNIFORMS $17.57 Invoice 391234 Cash Payment 11-12-02 UNIFORMS $17.57 Invoice 391234 Cash Payment 11-12-02 MATS $30.42 Invoice 391234 Cash Payment 11-12-02 MATS $30.42 Invoice 391234 Cash Payment 11-12-02 MATS $30.41 Invoice 391234 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 .~ .......... , .............. Total $739.82 ~e~r li260~ ~N~ Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 10-02 WATER #5158501 $36.00 Invoice 103102 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 10-02 WATER #5158500 $17.70 Invoice 103102 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies 10-02 WATER #5158500 $17.70 Invoice 103102 Date 11/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $71.40 Refe; ii2e02 GMECONSuL~-ANTS E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials -5121 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 7 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 08-19-02 THRU 10-12-02 WATERMAIN $918.25 INSTALLATION Invoice 15258 Cash Payment Invoice 15259 E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 05-01-02 THRU 10-12-02 2002 STORM SEWER $268.65 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,186.90 Refer 112602 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $588.30 Invoice 627431 Cash Payment LIQUOR $2,242.54 Invoice 627430 Cash Payment WINE $577.83 Invoice 623957 Cash Payment LIQUOR $1,738.19 Invoice 623956 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,146.86 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Refer 112602 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 110402 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Refer 112602 H & L MESABI AGGREGATE CONS E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 11/18/2002 REIMBURSE FILM $21.89 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $21.89 PLOW BLADE $160.82 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $160,82 Cash Payment Invoice 55695 Transaction Date Refer 112602 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID $1,064.40 Invoice 479855 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,064.40 Refer 112602 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HEAVY WALL TUBE $33.49 Invoice 42179 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $33.49 Refer 112602 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CE E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training Cash Payment EMT CLASS NICCUM $36,00 Invoice 090602 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training EMT CLASS BRUCKNER $36.00 Invoice 090602 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training EMT CLASS MURRAY $162.00 Invoice 090602 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $234.00 Refer 112602 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 101-41410-322 Postage ELECTION COURIER $130.66 Invoice 111802 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $130,66 Refer 112602 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE -5122- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 8 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training HAZ MAT OPERATIONAL, JAKUBIK $261.45 Invoice 00054037 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training FIRE FIGHTER, HENKELS $610.05 Invoice 00054037 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $871.50 Refer 112602 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE $1,128.00 Invoice 110702-A Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $3,412.85 Invoice 110702-B Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 10-02 LANGDON BAY $112.50 Invoice 110702-C1 Cash Payment G 101-22914 Middelstaedt #02-37 Consult 10-02 MIDDLESTEADT WAIVER $37.50 Invoice 110702-C2 Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 POST OFFICE SITE $37.50 Invoice 110702-C3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 LANGDON BAY TRAIL $93.75 Invoice 110702-C4 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 ZONING MAP $487.50 Invoice 110702-C5 Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 MOUND VISIONS $1,225.75 Invoice 110702-D Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 TIF RELATED WORK $933.87 Invoice 110702-E Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,469.22 Refer 112602 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 12-02 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL SPACE $4,342.00 Invoice 112602 Transaction Date 11/21/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,342.00 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CAPSULE, HEADLAMPE $37.16 Invoice 11694 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TOWING, REPAIR WIRING $91.78 Invoice 11785 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 11794 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 11806 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 11906 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 11935 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $232.38 Refer 112602 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORA TED Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising LIQUOR STORE SURVEY $550.61 Invoice 45966 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $550.61 Refer 112602 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR -5123- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 9 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $850.92 Invoice 1483746 Cash Payment WINE $1,499.80 Invoice 1483745 Cash Payment WINE $1,342.70 Invoice 1483744 Cash Payment WINE $645.00 Invoice 1483743 Cash Payment LIQUOR $399.50 Invoice 1483742 Cash Payment WINE $145.25 invoice 1480599 Cash Payment WINE $155.00 Invoice 1480598 Cash Payment LIQUOR $189.98 Invoice 1480597 Cash Payment WINE $680.45 Invoice 1480596 Cash Payment LIQUOR $139.75 Invoice 1480595 Cash Payment LIQUOR $2,586.73 Invoice 1467837 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $382.40 Invoice 1464537 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,317.40 invoice 1464536 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $33.10 Invoice 1464535 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $987.55 Invoice 1461251 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $104.00 Invoice 1461250 Cash Payment E 609~49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $398.78 Invoice 1461249 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $179.60 Invoice 1461248 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $864.00 Invoice 1461247 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15,901.91 Refer 112602 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 12-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $275.12 Invoice 112602 Cash Paymen[ E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 12-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $393.99 Invoice 112602 Transaction Date 11/21/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $669.11 Refer 112602 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 HRA MEETING $29.70 Invoice 54148-A E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale -5124- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 10 Cash Payment Invoice 54148-B Cash Payment Invoice 54148-C Cash Payment Invoice 54148-D Cash Payment Invoice 54148-E Cash Payment Invoice 54148-F Cash Payment Invoice 54149-A Cash Payment G 601-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings Invoice 54149-B Cash Payment G 101-22891 Kells Lane Vacation, J. Paul Invoice 54149-C1 Cash Payment G 101-22895 Kells Lane Vacation Jeff Paul 10-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION E 455-46380.300 Professional Srvs E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs G 101-22908 Landform Development E 354-43140-300 Professional Srvs E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 REDEVELOPMENT PROJ AREA #1 10-02 POST OFFICE RELOCATION 10-02 MUELLER LANSING PROPERTY 10-02 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT 10-02 DEFICIENCE AGREEMENT TIF-1 10-02 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT 10-02 NEW LIQUOR STORE 10-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION Invoice 54149-C2 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-D Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-E Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-F Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-G Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-H1 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-H2 Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi Invoice 54149-H3 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-H4 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-H5 Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-11 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-12 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-J1 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 Invoice 54149-J2 Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi Invoice 54149-J3 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-K1 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54149-K2 10-02 DREAMWOOD LAWSUIT 10-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE 10-02 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY 10-02 EXECUTIVE 10-02 ORONO AGREEMENT ISSUES 10-02 AQUILLINA ISSUES 10-02 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT 10-02 POST OFFICE RELOCATION 10-02 ADMINISTRATIVE 10-02 FIRE CONTRACT ISSUES 10-02 PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES 10-02 PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS 10-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 10-02 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT 10-02 WESTEDGE BLVD 10-02 RETAINING WALLS $797.50 $230.74 $33.00 $258.5O -$575.00 $2,423.58 $105.59 $195.00 $195.00 $36.00 $110.68 $140.88 $1,068.00 $6O.OO $42.OO $42.00 $3O6.O0 $1,222.30 $1,212.00 $105.80 $184.00 $2O.OO $48.00 $12.00 $168.00 -5125- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 11 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 5429 BREEZY ROAD $78.00 Invoice 54149-K3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS $380.80 Invoice 54149-K4 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 10-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $54.00 Invoice 54149-K5 Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 10-02 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT $306.00 Invoice 54149-L6 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $9,290.07 Refer 112602 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 101-41410-351 Legal Notices Publishing 10-19-02 NOTICE ELECTION $31.84 Invoice 405 Cash Payment E 101-41410-351 Legal Notices Publishing 10-19-02 ACCURACY TEST $15.92 Invoice 405 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $47.76 Refer 112602 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials LANTERN BATTERY $91.82 Invoice 0292578 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials CIRCUIT TESTER $18.97 Invoice 0238214 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials NYLONG SNAP BUSHING $325.40 Invoice 0292577 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $436.19 Refer 112602 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101-41110-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $68.66 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 101-41310-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $54.10 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 101-41500-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $151.89 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 101-42110-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $1,764.40 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 101-42400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $176.86 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 101-43100-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $661.65 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 101-45200-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $153.96 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 222-42260-151 Worker's COmp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $4,381.86 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 609~49750-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $634.60 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 601-49400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $911.33 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 602-49450-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS coMp $1,346.19 Invoice 02-000644-16-B Cash Payment E 281-45210-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR WORKERS COMP $193.50 invoice 02-000644-16-B -5126- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 12 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10,49g.00 Refer 112602 LOVE, JASON Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND WATER/SEWER $8.23 Invoice 020102-B Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8.23 Refer 112602 LUBE TECH, INCORPORATED E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply Cash Payment GEARLUBE $30.35 Invoice 894717 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply GEARLUBE $30.35 Invoice 894717 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply GEARLUBE $30.36 Invoice 894717 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $91.06 Refer 112602 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $121.80 Invoice 477749 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,315.95 Invoice 477748 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,899.00 Invoice 475470 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,336.75 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-04-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $15.20 Invoice 11776 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-07-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $110.50 Invoice 11799 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-11-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $21.60 Invoice 11810 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-14-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $142.30 Invoice 11832 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $289.60 Refer 112602 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 BEACHWOOD POND $49.50 Invoice 41628 Project 07544 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 WESTEDGE MISC ENGINEERING $9,025.90 Invoice 41629 Project 07827 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 WESTEDGE WATERMAIN $416.80 ENGINEERING Invoice 41630 Project 07953 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PLANNING MISC ENGINEERING $841.50 Invoice 41631 Project 08901 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 ZONING MISC ENGINEERING $399.10 Invoice 41632 Project 08902 Cash Payment E 10%43100-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 STREETS MISC ENGINEERING $124.00 ) Invoice 41633 Project 08903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 WATER MlSC ENGINEERING $24~75 Invoice 41634-A Project 08904 -5127- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 13 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 SEWER MISC ENGINEERING $24,75 invoice 41634-B Project 08904 Cash Payment E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PARKS MISC ENGINEERING $49.50 Invoice 41635 Project 08905 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 STORM SEWER PROJECT $105.00 Invoice 41636 Project 10293 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 10-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $99,00 invoice 41637 Project 12252 Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 POST OFFICE DEMOLITION $1,887.10 Invoice 41638 Project 12379 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 CTY RD 15 RELOCATION $2,381,80 Invoice 41639 Project 12533 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 DOWNTOWN TIF DISTRICT $99.00 Invoice 41640 Project 12534 Cash Payment G 101-22847 5947 Ridgewood, Muonio, Su 10-02 MUONIO SUB-DIV MINOR $49.50 Invoice 41641 Project 12711 Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 10-02 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT $773.70 Invoice 41642 Project 12754 Cash Payment G 101-22863 6301 Lynwood, 00-41, Baltuti 10-02 6301 LYNWOOD #00`41 CARLSON $148.50 Invoice 41643 Project 12982 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 MCES LIFT STATION $49.50 Invoice 41644 Project 13132 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 XCEL SUB-STATION $99.00 Invoice 41645 Project 13190 Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 RETAINING WALL REPLACE $4,622.60 invoice 41646 Project 13215 Cash Payment E 281-45210-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 SHORELINE FOOTAGE $496.40 Invoice 41647 Project 13223 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 2003 STREET REPLACEMENT $1,059.00 Invoice 41648 Project 13276 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 WELL/PUMPHOUSE $148.00 Invoice 41649 Project 13313 Cash Payment G 101-22891 Kells Lane Vacation, J. Paul 10-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION $24.75 Invoice 41650-A Project 13327 Cash Payment G 101~22895 Kells Lane Vacation Jeff Paul 10-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION $24.75 Invoice 41650-B Project 13327 Cash Payment G 101-22867 Walnut Lane, 00-56, Hinrichs 10-02 6384 WALNUT LANE GRADING $345.50 Invoice 41651 Project 13488 Cash Payment G 101-22860 2642 Commerce, Bristol Clas 10-02 MAHOGANY BAY CUP $49.50 Invoice 41652 Project 13495 Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 LOST LAKE/AUDITORS GREEN $351.27 Invoice 41653 Project 13566 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 10-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $786.30 Invoice 41654 Project 13646 Cash Payment E 675`49425-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT $12,045.30 Invoice 41655 Project 13677 Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $49.50 Invoice 41656 Project 13747 Cash Payment G 101-22899 Pastuck Natural Homes #02- 10-02 PASTUCK SUB-DIVISION $346.00 Invoice 4 Project 13770 -5128- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 14 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 10-02 MHR DEVELOPMENT $49.50 Invoice 41658 Project 13832 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 1708 DOVE DRAINAGE ISSUES $99.00 Invoice 41659 Project 13847 Cash Payment G 101-22915 Middlestaedt #02-37 Utility E 10-02 MIDDLESTAEDT WAIVE PLAT $442.00 Invoice 41660 Project 13899 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PETERSON DRAINAGE ISSUE $49.50 Invoice 41661 Project 13939 Cash Payment G 101-22913 2586 Avon Dr Madsen Var 0 10-02 MADSEN VARIANCE $99.00 Invoice 41662 Project 13972 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 TAX FORFEIT H.C. INQUIRY $148.50 Invoice 41663 Project 14000 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $37,884.27 Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs 07-01-02 THRU 09-30-02 $11,145.31 Invoice 100402 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $11 145.31 Refer 112602 METRO FIRE Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies LEATHER FRONT $103.52 Invoice 11533 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair RING,HOSE ASSEMBLY $217.51 Invoice 11489 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $321.03 Refer 112602 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 12-02 WASTEWATER $48,974.50 Invoice 0000746930 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $48,974.50 Refer 112602 MIDWEST ROOFINO ' ' Cash Payment R 101-32210 Building Permits REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE $97.25 Invoice 110802 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $97.25 Refer 112602 MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY/-FECH Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training DATA PRIVACY UPDATES HAWKS $65.00 Invoice 03-027 PO 17392 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training DATA PRIVACY UPDATES DEBORD $65.00 Invoice 03-027 PO 17392 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $130.00 Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts BLACK PLAYCURB $110.76 Invoice 2002411 PO 17265 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $110.76 Refer 112602 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 06-19-02 THRU 09-24-02 MAXWELL $2,580.00 PROPERTY Invoice VLC16010 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,580.00 -5129- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 15 Refer 112602 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 10-02 DRILLS $650.00 Invoice 103102 Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 10-02 MONTHLY SALARIES $4,683.00 Invoice 103102 Cash Payment E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 10-02 WAGE REPORT $1,250.00 Invoice 103102 Transaction Date 11/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,583.00 Refer 112602 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply SIGNS $44.45 Invoice TI-0096376 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $44.45 Refer 112602 NICCUM DOCKS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 281-45210-440 Other Contractual Servic REMOVE DOCKS $2,375.00 Invoice 1982 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,375.00 Refer 112602 NORBERG, DUANE Cash Payment E 101-41410-430 Miscellaneous REIMURSE ELECTION EXPENSE $12.77 Invoice 110502 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $12.77 Refer 112602 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies JACK, GUAGE $52.69 Invoice 823317975 PO 17266 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $52.69 Refer 112602 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies NAME PLATE SIMONEAU $6.42 Invoice 182582891-001 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6.42 Refer 112602 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 10-02 LOCATES $134.85 Invoice 210539 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 10-02 LOCATES $134.85 Invoice 210539 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $269.70 Refer 112602 OWENS COMPANIES, INC. Cash Payment E 222-42260-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings TERMINAL GAS VALVE $127.00 Invoice 62032 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $127.00 Refer 112602 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WiNE $1,106.00 Invoice 0202531-1N Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $11106.00 Refer 112602 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $46.40 Invoice 36973328 -5130- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 18 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 112602 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 892846 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 892845 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 892844 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 3269733 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR Invoice 3269732 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR Invoice 3269731 Cash Payment WINE Invoice 890592 Cash Payment LIQUOR Invoice 890591 Cash Payment WINE Invoice 878776 Cash Payment WINE Invoice 878775 Cash Payment LIQUOR Invoice 878774 Cash Payment WINE Invoice 876417 Cash Payment LIQUOR Invoice 876416 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES Invoice 4471 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES Invoice 4471 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,226.32 Refer 112602 PLUNKETT'S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic OCT,NOV,DEC INSECT CONTROL $95.84 Invoice 671790 Transaction Date 11/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.84 Refer 112602 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Total $46.40 $93.00 $847.00 $1,134.00 -$9 78 -$4,48 -$3,13 $443.50 $244.10 $93,00 $121.75 $69.75 $3,300.95 $954.00 Total $7,283,66 $555.14 $671.18 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$17.42 Invoice 188125-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $216.38 Invoice 191514-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,540.08 Invoice 191137-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $52.54 Invoice 189242-00 -5131 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 17 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $23.75 Invoice 188586-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,557.39 Invoice 188585-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,374.37 invoice 188490-00 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,747.09 Refer 112602 RELIANT ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-000-053-000 $75.07 Invoice 112902 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-001-095-800 $121.80 Invoice 112902 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-001-833-500 $29.40 Invoice 112902 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-001-852-100 $168.08 Invoice 112902 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-001-853-000 $302.51 invoice 112902 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-001-972-603 $24.61 Invoice 112902 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-001-972-603 $13.98 Invoice 112902 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 09-19-02 THRU 10-18-02 #543-001-972-603 $17.32 Invoice 112902 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $752.77 Refer 112602 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AIR AND OXYGEN $22.45 Invoice R 10021945 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $22.45 Refer 112602 SCHARBERAND SONS Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery GROMT AND FILTER IN TANK $41.54 Invoice 25524 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $41.54 Refer 112602 SERVICE MASTER CLEAN Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services CAN LINERS SMALL $29.71 Invoice 13071 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $29.71 Refer 112602 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I Cash Payment E 401-46580-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY $153.89 Invoice 0093739 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $153.89 Refer 112602 SKINNER, GREG Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE BOOT ALLOWANCE $36.97 Invoice 111502 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE BOOT ALLOWANCE $36.97 Invoice 111502 -5132- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 18 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE BOOT ALLOWANCE $36.96 Invoice 111502 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $110.90 Refer 112602 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment E 101.41310-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $93.87 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $93.87 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $93.87 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $93.87 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $93.87 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $31.29 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $31.29 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $46.93 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies LETTERHEAD/ENVELOPES $46.93 Invoice 64211 PO 17457 Cash Payment E 101-42400-203 Printed Forms INSPECTION NOTICE FORMS $177.59 Invoice 64279 Transaction Date Marquette Bank Mou 10100 11/12/2002 Total $803.38 Refer ~i2602 SPEEDWA~SUPERAMERiCA (FiR Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 11-22-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $256.67 Invoice 112002 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $256,67 Refer 112602 SPORTING BREED KENNELS Cash Payment E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees 12-02 DOG KENNEL FEE $325.00 Invoice 112602 Transaction Date 11/21/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $325.00 Refer 112602 SPURSTATION Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SEPT&OCT SQUAD WASHES $195.51 Invoice 111202 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total : $195.51 Refer 112602 STREICHER'S Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR SPOTLIGHT SQUAD #842 $31.62 Invoice 320570.1 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $31 62 Refer 112602 STS CONSULTANTS Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs THRU 11-09-02 MAXWELL PROPERTY $1,046.25 Invoice 237448 Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,046.25 Refer ii2602 SUBURBAN TiRE COMPANy -5133- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 19 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRES $380.78 Invoice 10007369 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRES $200.22 Invoice 10007140 PO 17490 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $581.00 Refer 112602 SUN NEWSPAPERS Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising CLASSIFIED MANAGER $440.80 Invoice 549293 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $440.80 Refer 112602 SUNRAM CONSTRUCT/ON INCOR Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs PAYMENT #1 2002 RETAINING WALL $48,430.38 REPLACEMENT Invoice 110602 Transaction Date 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $48,430.38 Refer 112602 THORPE DISTRIBUTINGCOMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,465.95 Invoice 279812 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $55.55 Invoice 279811 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $522.50 Invoice 279258 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,892.65 Invoice 279257 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $25.70 Invoice 279256 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8,962.35 Refer 112602 THYSSEN-KRUPP ELEVATOR COR Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 11-02 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE $158.60 Invoice 66645 Transaction Date 11/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $158.60 Refer 112602 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REGISTER ROLLS $176.75 Invoice 14327 Transaction Date 11/20/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $176.75 Refer 112602 TRI-STATE PUMP AND CONTOL, I Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts STROBE LIGHT $147.82 Invoice 21701 Transaction Date 11/18/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $147.82 Refer 112602 TRUE VALUE, MOUND Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $94.16 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $11.00 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $109.05 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $164.30 Invoice 093002 -5134- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 20 Current Period: November 2002 Cash Payment 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $164.30 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment $164.24 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment $4.66 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment $31.09 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment $78.56 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment $89.84 invoice 093002 Cash Payment $155.25 Invoice 093002 Cash Payment $37.30 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $37.30 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $37.25 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $291.96 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $198.07 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $96.88 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $16.15 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $3.82 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $2.51 Invoice 103002 Cash Payment $233,08 Invoice 103002 Transaction Date Refer 112602 Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Pads $17.82 Invoice 109986 Cash Payment G 101-22810 X-Mas Lights Donation/Expe $43.13 Invoice 110598 Transaction Date 11/15/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $60 95 Refer 112602 TWIN ci~ ~o~F~i~l'~Y E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply G 101-22810 X-Mas Lights Donation/Expe E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 11/19/2002 TRUE VALUE, NA VAARRE 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 09-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 10-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 CONCRETE FORM TUBE CBD CHRISTMAS Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.83 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.83 Invoice 362876-0 ~Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.83 Invoice 362876-0 -5135- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 21 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $3.83 invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $3.83 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $1.28 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies $1.28 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $1.91 Invoice 382876-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $1.91 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies $26.40 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $52.80 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $52.79 Invoice 362876-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies $14.90 Invoice 362490-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies $50.64 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies $50.64 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $50.64 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $50.64 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $50,64 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $16.88 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies $16.88 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $25,32 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $25.30 Invoice 362324-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies $164.84 Invoice 363818-0 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $674.84 Refer 112602 UNIFORMS LIMITED G 101-22803 Police Reserves UNIFORMS, RESERVES $412,04 PO 17431 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies PATCHES $169.69 Cash Payment Invoice 147520 Cash Payment Invoice 146087 Cash Payment Invoice 146268 Transaction Date E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE APPOINTMENT BOOK MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES CAP, FLAIG, KEVEN $40.70 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $622.63 -5136- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 22 Current Period: November 2002 Refer 112602 WELLS FARGO Cash Payment E 354-43140-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 06-01-02 THRU 11-30-02 PAY AGENT FEE $375.00 Invoice 93432 Transaction Date 11/19/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $375.00 Refer 112602 WINKLER, BOB E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials BANK FiLL AND SAND $5,700.38 Cash Payment Invoice 103102 Cash Payment invoice 103102 Cash Payment invoice 103102 Transaction Date E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials BANK FILL AND SAND $2,000.00 E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials BANK FILL AND SAND $1,000.00 11/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8,700.38 Refer 112602 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #2245-301-939 $697.14 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0466-607-223 $17.56 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electdc Utilities 10-02 #1914-601-425 $307.93 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0217-606-329 $3,027.89 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #2184-407-147 $282.93 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0047-006-229 $141.87 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0864-508-832 $82.60 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0864-508-832 $82.60 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0864-508-832 $82.60 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0018-802-634 $1,219.07 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 10-02 #0009-604-835 $190.02 Invoice 1002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 10-02 #0542-505-000-305 $4,869.46 Invoice 1002 Transaction Date 11/12/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 -5137- CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/21/02 10:10 AM Page 23 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 354 Commerce Place Tif 1-1 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $104,395.01 $15,516.16 $3,241.30 ($200.00) $25,815.87 $16,496.44 $8,980.56 $55,006.65 $74,249.61 $8,639.08 $12,905.92 $325,046.60 Pre*Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $325,046.60 $325,046.60 -5138- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A SIX (6) FOOT FRONT YARD FENCE AT 5201 WATERBURY ROAD LOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 19, WHIPPLE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PID# 25-117-24-21-0058 PLANNING AND ZONING CASE NO. 02-38 WHEREAS, the applicants, Tom and Tara Stokes, have submitted a request for a two (2) foot height variance to allow installation of a six (6) foot front yard fence to be constructed along a portion the property line in the southeast corner of the property at 5201 Waterbury Road; and WHEREAS, the purpose for the variance is to help deflect headlights from the vehicles traveling along Tuxedo Boulevard as well as to minimize vehicle noise; and WHEREAS, the applicant has also indicated that the increased fence height will help provide safety for the children when playing in the yard; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350:475 regulates fence height to no more than four (4) feet when located in the front yard measured from existing grade; and. WHEREAS, as required by City Code Section 350:530, the variance application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 4, 2002 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's recommendation was forwarded to the City Council for review at its November 12, 2002 meeting at which time the application was approved subject to conditions. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Council does hereby approve the variance as requested and makes the following findings of fact: -5139- a. There are practical difficulties associated with the subject property including topography and placement of the house on the lot. bo The only practical, fiat, play area is on the east end of the property and the play equipment is located in close proximity to a busy street (Tuxedo Boulevard) which negatively affects child safety. c. There is significant headlight glare from the north into the neighbor's house as cars approach around the curve and the rise. do The impact of the fence is minimized as the grade at the house is near the top of the fence height therefore giving the fence a shorter appearance since very little of the lot is hidden. e. The proposed fence is a single, straight run that is significantly shorter than the lot line it parallels and therefore does not "box in" the lot. f. The proposed fence is shorter than what would be allowed if it was a living hedge. g. The setback from the curb is typical of minimum front yard setbacks for houses that can be (35) feet high. h. The fence to be installed will not exceed sixty (60) feet in length and will be located in the southeast corner of the property line. 2. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block 19, Whipple, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted November 26, 2002 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -5140- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT (#A14569) WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY REGARDING ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED DATA BASE (EPDB) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Hennepin County has developed a proprietary geographical digitized data base (EPDB); and WHEREAS, the City of Mound desires to use the County's EPDB in the course of conducting the City's business; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved the license agreement on April 13, 1999, by Resolution #99-31; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved the extension of this agreement through December 31,2002, by resolution #02-17; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is now asking that we extend the EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement through December 31,2003; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the extension of Hennepin County's EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement (#14569) through December 31, 2003. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of November, 2002. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -5141- Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department Survey Division, Suite A-703 Hennepin County Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 5.5487-0073 November 13, 2002 612-348-3131, Phone www.co.hennepin.mn.us Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk City of Mound 5342 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364-1687 Agreement Ct A14569 Hennepin County desires to extend the above referenced EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement through December 31, 2003. If you.as a Government Unit, Consultant/Third Party or Private Corporation, desire to extend the above-reference Agreement, the following requirements must be satisfied as they pertain to your entity. Please return the required information to Hennepin County, Attention: Robert Moulder (at the address stated at the top of this page). ^.) GOVERNMENTAL UNIT MUST FURNISH TO THE COUNTY A COPY OF THE ACTION OF USER'S GOVERNING BODY AUTHORIZING THIS AGREEMENT EXTENSION. HOWEVER, IF AN OFFICIAL OF USER IS AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR CHARTER TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT OF THIS NATURE THEN THIS ORIGINAL LETTER SIGNED BY SUCH OFFICIAL AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION MUST BE RETURNED TO THE COUNTY. NOTE: SUCH OFFICIAL MUST ATTACH TO THIS LETTER A COPY OF THEIR STATUTORY OR CHARTER AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENTS. B.) CONSULTANT/THIRD PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE COUNTY A COPY OF AFFIRMATION BY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT THAT YOU WILL CONTINUE AS CONSULTANT AS STATED IN AGREEMENT NO. THROUGH THE YEAR 2003. IN ADDITION, CONSULTANT/THIRD PARTY MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. c.) PRIVATE CORPORATION MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. An Equal Opportunity Employer - 5142 - Recycled Paper As authorized by the Agreement and noting the above requirements, which pertain to you specifically, please indicate below your intention to extend or not to extend this agreement through the year 2003. Please remm the originals of this page and the acknowledgement page and a copy of affmuation as Consultant/Third Party, as required, to the attention of Robert Moulder at the address shown at the top of page 1 as soon as possible. Please check (X) appropriate box. __ It IS our intention to extend this agreement through the year 2003. __ It is NOT our intention to extend this agreement through the year 2003. We no longer require this information. Signature: Date: Authorized Signature Title: If you have any questions about this notice, please call Robert Moulder at 612-348-2618 for assistance. Sincerely, County Xdministrator ~ Attachment -5143- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 CITY OF MOUND PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BONNIE RITTER SUBJECT: ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSE APPLICATIONS DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 2002 Attached are the applications received from SKD, Inc., D.B.A. Carbone's Pizzeria. They are requesting on-sale licenses for wine and 3.2 beer. The appropriate fees have been received and the application has been forwarded on to the Police Department for the preliminary investigation and background checks. I suggest that approval be contingent upon satisfactory results from the investigation, and receipt of proof of insurance. CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 Mound Business: Mound Address: Applicant Name: ~/~t~'.g ~. Type of Business: Applicant Date of Birth: Citizen:~ YES __ NO Driver's Lic. #: Home Address: Co. any Name: Company Ad.ess: Comply Officials: 1. 2. 3. APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL WINE p ,iZ~a~ ,~ Bus. ehone:~ ' ~) Social Security #: ~ ~ 0~- ~_qy /)- ~ 00 -. 3~ -~/3~-- 9?5' City: City: (First) (Middle) (Last) (First) (Middle) (Last) (Date of Birth) (First) (Middle) (Last) References: (List three - name and address of each) Indicate whether you sold $20,000 or more of wine in previous year: Yes: Si No:')( -5145- Mound Business: Mound Address: APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL ON-SALE 3.2 BEER Applicant Date of Birth: Citizen: ~x/< YES __ NO Driver's Lic. #:. Home Address: 302~o C._,4qSfa ?ou,T~ (First) (Middle) (Last) 2. HomePhone(_¢~9~"]/"O0]3 Company Name: Con-~any Address: Company Officials: Co. Phonel ~ ,2.) ~r~ ~' city: (Date of B~) o (First) (Middle) (Last) (Date of Birth) (First) (Middle) (Last) (Date of Birth) Keferences: (List three - name and address of each) Indicate whether you sold $25,000 or more of 3.2 BEER in previous year: Yes: No: -5146 PROOF OF WO~RS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE lViinnc~ta Statute ~cction 17~. 182 n:quirm every ~tatc and local Iiccnsing agency to witl~old thc issuance or renewal of a license or permit to operate a business in Minnesota until thc appIicant presents acceptable evidene~ of compliance with the workers' compensation insurance coverage requirement of Section 176.181, SuM. 2. The information required is: The name of the insurance company, the policy number, and dates of coverage or the permit to self-insure. This information will be collected by the licensing agency and put in their company file. It will be furnished, upon request, to thc Det~.mcnt of Labor and Industry to check for compliance with Minnesota Statute Section 176.181, SuM. 2. This information is required by law, and licenses and permits to operate a business may not be issued or renewed if it is not provided and/or is falsely reported. Furthermore, if tttis information is not provided andIor falsely reported, it may result in a $I,000 penalty a&~&~d against the applicant by the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Industry payable to the Special Compensation Fund. Provide the information specified above in the spaces provided, or certify the precise reason your business is excluded from compliance with the insurance coverage requirement for workers' compensation. e sum c N^m: _(NOT the insurance agent) Policy Number or Self-Insurance Permit Number: Dates of Coverage: ~'(t~t~ (OR) I am not required to have workers' -compensation liability coverage because: ( ) I have no employees COvered by the law. ( ) Other (sPeCify) · I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND MY RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS WITH REGARD TO BUSINESS LICENSe, PERMITS AND WORI~ERS' COMPENS&TION COVERAGE, AND I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TR, UE AND CORRECT. -5147- DATA PRIVACY ADVISORY In accordance with M.S. 13.04, "Rights of Subjects of Data", we would like to inform you that your request for a permit or license from the City of Mound or any of its departments may require you to furnish certain private or eordidential information. You are notified that: The informatiOn you furnish will be used to determine your qualification for the permit or license requested. You may refuse to supply data, but refusal may require that the City deny the permit or license. The information may be shared with other local, state, or federal agencies to the extent necessary to process the permit or license. If your requested permit or license requires Council action to approve, some information may become public. 5. You have certain rights under M.S. 13.04 to review private data on yourself. 6. Your full name and date of birth are required to process this application or permit. (please type or priat) LAST NAME FIRST MIDDLE HOME ADDRESS Og, ' ' 5T3'91 C~TY ) o/~/(~ DATE OF BIRTH TELEPHONE (HOME) STATE ZIP TELEPHONE (WORK) I understand my rights as stated above. -5148- License Applicant Inf0rmati0'n Under Minnesota law (M.S. 270.72), the agency issuing you this license is'required to provide to the Minnesota Commissioner of ReVenue your Minnesota business tax identification number and the Social Securit-ng number'of each license applicant. Under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and the Federal Privacy Act of 1974, we mu.nt advise you tl~: This information may be used to deny the issuance, renewal or transfer of your Ii~ens~ if you owe the Department of R~venue delinquent taxes, penalti~, or int~r~st; The licensing agency will supply it only to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. However, under the Federal Exchange of Information Act, the Department of Revenue is allowed to supply this information tn the Internal Revenue Service; Failing to supply this information may jeopardize or delay the issuance of your license or processing you renewal application. Please fill in the following information and return this form along .with your application to the agency issuing the license. Do not return this form to the Department of Revenue. Please print or tTpe Name of license being applied for and license number Licensing Authority (name of city, county~ or state agency issuing license) License renewal date PERSONAL INFORMATION: Applicant's Last Name First Name and Initial Social Security Number Applicant's Address City BUSINESS INFORMATION (if applicable): State Zip Code Business Name Business Address / o'1 o5' o State Zip Code Minnesota Tax Identification Number Federal Tax Identification Number Ii a$ignature ~/~'~ Mi nn~/i~t,a Tax/~'Idenfifi~~ number is no, required,o~, l"~TitlPlease"/;plain ,~ ~g~ } ~"[°n the reverse side of'~is, t'o~;. _ -5149- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Community Development Director Sarah Smith and City Clerk Bonnie Ritter 11/22/2002 Interim Ordinance to Regulate Adult Uses in the City of Mound SUlVIMARY For your review and consideration, an interim ordinance to enact a moratorium to regulate adult uses in the City of Mound has been included. As there are currently no regulations in the City Code that regulate these types of uses, it is Cky staff's recommendation that an interim ordinance be enacted to allow time for the City to undertake a study to evaluate location requirements for adult uses. Members of the Council are advised that project was preliminary discussed by the Planning Commission earlier this year and was supported by members of the Commission. -5150- ORDINANCE NO. -2002 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PLACING TEMPORARY LOCATION REQUIREMENTS ON ADULT USES IN THE CITY OF MOUND AND DIRECTING A STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED The City of Mound Does Ordain: SECTION 1. PURPOSE. 1.1. The purpose of this interim Ordinance is to protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City by placing temporary location requirements on adult uses within the City of Mound. The Ordinance will allow adult uses as defined in this Ordinance, but subject to certain location requirements until the City can complete a comprehensive study and enact permanent zoning regulations relating to adult uses. This Ordinance does not have the effect of imposing a limitation or restriction on the content of any communicative materials, including adult-oriented materials protected by the First Amendment. SECTION 2. FINDINGS. 2.1. A number of studies have been conducted in the State of Minnesota including a report entitled "Report of the Attorney General's Working Group on Regulation of Sexually Oriented Businesses dated June 6, 1989, prepared by Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota; an Olmstead County Planning Department "Adult Entertainment Report" dated March 2, 1988, and "A 40-Acre Study" prepared by the St. Paul Division of Planning in 1987, all of which reports are hereafter collectively referred to as "Reports". The Reports considered evidence from studies conducted in Minneapolis and St. Paul and in other cities throughout the country relating to sexually oriented businesses. 2.2. The Attorney General's Report, based upon the above-referenced studies and the testimony presented to it has concluded that "sexually oriented businesses are associated with high crime rates and depression of property values." In addition, the Attorney General's Working Group "...heard testimony that the character of a neighborhood can dramatically change when there is a concentration of sexually oriented businesses adjacent to residential property." The Reports conclude that: a) adult uses have an impact on the neighborhoods surrounding them, which is distinct from the impact caused by other commercial uses; b) residential neighborhoods located within close proximity to adult theaters, bookstores and other adult uses experience increased crime rates (sex-related crimes in particular), lower property values, increased transiency and decreased stability of ownership; c) the adverse impacts which adult uses have on surrounding areas diminish as the distance from the adult uses increases; -5151 - d) studies of other cries have shown that among the crimes which tend to increase either within or in the near vicinity of adult uses am rapes, prostitution, child molestation, indecent exposure and other lewd and lascivious behavior; e) many members of the public perceive areas within which adult uses are located as less safe than other areas which do not have such uses; and f) studies of other cities have shown that the values of both commercial and residential properties either are diminished or fail to appreciate at the rate of other comparable properties when located in proximity to adult uses. 2.3 The CRy Council of the City of Mound finds that adult uses will have secondary effects upon certain pre-existing land uses within the CRy. 2.4 The City Council is concerned that the City's Zoning Code may be inadequate in its scope and in its restrictions to accomplish the purpose for which it was intended. 2.5 In addition to the proper zoning classification of such uses there are a number of significant planning and land use issues pertaining to the regulation of such uses, including the following: a) The particular districts in which such uses shall be allowed as permitted uses. b) The concentration and density of such uses in the City and its neighborhoods. c) The effect of such uses on other uses in the surrounding area. 2.6. Them is a need for a study to be conducted so that the City, as part of its planning process, can adopt a comprehensive plan and land use zoning regulations pertaining to adult establishment uses. Such a study will address the land use and zoning issues, including those referenced above. 2.7. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Sub. 4 permits the adoption of interim zoning ordinances during the planning process. SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS. 3.1. Adult Establishments. MDT-223676vl MU220-5 2 -5152- a) any business that devotes a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly displayed merchandise, or devotes a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to the public) to, or derives a substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues from, items, merchandise, devices or other materials distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material depicting, exposing, simulating, describing, or relating to Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas; or b) any business that engages in any Adult Use as defined in Section 3.2 of this Ordinance. 3.2. Adult Use. An adult use is any of the activities and businesses described below: a) Adult Uses. Aduk uses include adult bookstores, aduk motion picture theaters, adult mini-motion picture theaters, adult massage parlors, adult steam room/bathhouse/sauna facilities, aduk companionship establishments, adult rap/conversation parlors, adult heakh/sport clubs, aduk cabarets, adult novelty businesses, adult motion picture arcades, aduk modeling studios, adult hotels/motels, adult body painting studios, and other premises, enterprises, establishments, businesses or places open to some or all members of the public, at or in which there is an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction or description of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas" which are capable of being seen by members of the public. Activities classified as obscene as defined by Minnesota Statutes 617.241 are not included. b) Adult Use- Body Painting Studio: An establishment or business which provides the service of applying paint or other substance, whether transparent or non-transparent, to the body of a patron when such body is wholly or partially nude in terms of "specified anatomical areas." c) Adult Use- Bookstore: A building or portion of a building used for the barter, rental or sale of items consisting of printed matter, pictures, slides, records, audio tape, videotape or motion picture film if such building or portion of a building is not open to the public generally but only to one or more classes of public, excluding any minor by reason of age, and if a substantial or significant portion of such items are distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on the depiction or description of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." d) Adult Use- Cabaret. A building or portion of a building for providing dancing or other live entertainment, if such building or portion of a building excludes minors by virtue of age and if such dancing or other live entertainment is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on the presentation, display, depiction or description of "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." e) Adult Use- Companionship Establishment: A companionship establishment which excludes minors by reason of age, and which provides the service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk or discussion between an employee of the establishment and a MDT-223676vl MU220-5 -5'153- customer, if such service is distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." f) Adult Use- Conversation/Rap Parlor: A conversation/rap parlor which excludes minors by reason of age, and which provides the services of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk or discussion, if such service is distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." g) Adult Use- Health/Sport Club: A health/sport club which excludes minors by reason of age, if such club is distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities' or "specified anatomical areas." h) Adult Use- Hotel or Motel: Adult hotel or motel means a hotel or motel from which minors are specifically excluded from patronage and where material is presented which is distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." i) Adult Use- Massage Parlor, Health Club: A massage parlor or health club which restricts minors by reason of age, and which provides the services of massage, if such service is distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on "specific sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." j) Adult Use- Mini-Motion Picture Theatre: A building or portion of a building with a capacity for less than 50 persons used for presenting material if such material is distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing or relating to a "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." k) Adult Use- Modeling Studio: An establishment whose major business is the provision, to customers, of figure models who are so provided with the intent of providing sexual stimulation or sexual gratification to such customers and who engaged in "specified sexual activities" or display "specified anatomical areas" while being observed, painted, painted upon, sketched, drawn, sculptured, photographed, or otherwise depicted by such customers. 1) Adult Use- Motion Picture Arcade: Any place to which the public is permitted or invited wherein coin or slug-operated or electronically, electrically or mechanically controlled or operated still or motion picture machines, projectors or other image producing devices are maintained to show images to five or fewer persons per machine at any one time, and where the images so displayed are distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on depicting or describing "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." m) Adult Use- Motion Picture Theatre: A building or portion of a building with a capacity of 50 or more persons used for presenting material if' such business or portion of a building as a prevailing practice excludes minors by reason of age or if such material is distinguished or characterized by a emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas" for Observation by patrons therein. MDT-223676vl MU220-5 4 -5154- n) Adult Use- Novelty Business: A business which has as a principal activity the sale of devices which stimulate human genitals or devices which are designed for sexual stimulation. o) Adult Use- Sauna: A sauna which excludes minors by reason of age, and which provides a steam bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of bathing, relaxation, or reducing, utilizing steam or hot air as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent, if the service provided by the sauna is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." p) Adult Use- Steam Room/Bathhouse Facility: A building or portion of a building used for providing a steam bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of pleasure, bathing relaxation or reducing, utilizing steam or hot air as a cleaning, relaxing or reducing agent if such building or portion of a building restricts minors by reason of age and if the service provided by the steam room/bathhouse facility is distinguished and characterized by an emphasis on "specified sexual activities" or "specified anatomical areas." 3.3. Specified Sexual Activities: a) Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, oral copulation, anal intercourse, oral-anal copulation, bestiality, direct physical stimulation of unclothed genitals, flagellation or torture in the context of a sexual relationship, or the use of excretory functions in the context of a sexual relationship, and any of the following sexually-oriented acts or conduct: anilingus, buggery, coprophagy, coprophilia, cunnillingus, fellatio, necrophilia, pederasty, pedophilia, piquerism, sophism, zooerastia; or b) Clearly depicted human genitals in the state of sexual stimulation, arousal or tumescence; or c) Use of human or animal ejaculation, sodomy, oral copulation, coitus, or masturbation; or d) Fondling or touching of nude human genitals, pubic region, buttocks or female breast(s); or e) Situations involving a person or persons, any of who are nude, clad in undergarments or in sexually revealing costumes, and who are engaged in activities involving the flagellation, torture, fettering, binding or other physical restraint of such persons; or f) Erotic or lewd touching, fondling or other sexually oriented contact with an animal by a human being; or g) Human excretion, urination, menstruation, vaginal or anal irrigation. 3.4. Specified Anatomical Areas: MDT-223676vl MU220-5 -5155- a) Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic regions, buttocks, anuses, or female breasts below a point immediately above the top of the areola; and b) Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered. 3.5. "Substantial or significant portion" means: 25% or more. SECTION 4. PLANNING AND ZONING STUDY; MORATORIUM. 4.1 A study is authorized to be conducted by City staff to determine how adult uses should be regulated within the City. The scope of the study should include, but is not limited to, the following: a) The particular zoning districts in which adult establishments should be allowed as permitted uses; b) The density and concentration of such uses; c) The effect of such uses on other uses in the surrounding area. 4.2 Upon completion of the study, the matter is to be considered by the Planning Commission for its review and recommendation to the City Council. 4.3 Temporary_ Location Requirements. Pursuant to Minn. Stat § 462.355, subd. 4, the following temporary location requirements are imposed on adult uses within the City of Mound: a) Adult uses are permitted uses in the B-1 Central Business District, the B-2 General Business District, and the I-1 Light Industrial District; b) Adult uses must be located at least five hundred (500) radial feet, as measured in a straight tine from the closest point of the property line of the property upon which the adult use is located to the property line of~ 1) Residential property; 2) Schools; 3) Churches or places of worship; 4) Any city-owned facility; 5) Any park and recreational property; 6) Any daycare facility. 4.4 Pending completion of the study and adoption of any amendments to the City's official controls, a moratorium is established on the issuance of any development approvals, including but not limited to preliminary plats, re-zonings, variances, conditional use permits, site MDT-223676vl 6 MU220-5 -5156- plans, or building permits for adult uses, except those proposed to be located in the temporary area established by Section 4.3 of this ordinance. 4.5 Except in the temporary area established by Section 4.3 of this ordinance, applications for any permits or approvals for adult uses shall not be accepted by the City nor shall the Planning Commission or City Council consider or grant approval of any such application during the period of the moratorium. The moratorium applies to applications that are pending with the City as of the date of the adoption of this Ordinance. 4.6 This Ordinance will be effective for a period of 12 months after its effective date. SECTION 5. ENFORCEMENT. 5.1. Violation of any portion of this ordinance shall be a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to 90 days and a fine of $1000 or both, plus the costs of prosecution. Each day that a violation occurs shall be considered a separate offense. 5.2. The City may enforce any provision of this ordinance by mandamus, injunction or any other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. SECTION 6. SEPARABILITY. 6.1 Every section, provision or part of this ordinance is declared separable from every section, provision or part of this ordinance. If any section, provision, or part of this ordinance is adjudged to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall not invalidate any other section, provision, or part of this ordinance. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. 7.1 This ordinance shall take effect the day after the date of its publication. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota this ,2002. __ day of CITY OF MOUND ATTEST: BY: Mayor City Clerk MDT-223676vl MU220-5 - 5157- Engineering ° Planning ° Surveying November 21, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Improvement Project 2002 (Mound Visions 2nd Addition) Change Order No. 3 MFRA #13646 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: Enclosed is Change Order No. 3 for Post Indicator Valves (PIV) on the subject property. These are required on the watermain lines servicing the buildings that have sprinkler systems, which are the three commercial buildings and the two great homes. Everyone missed them in the plan preparation and review process, including Metro Plains engineer, myself, and even the Fire Department. We are recommending approval of Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $11,800. This cost was included in the construction cost, when the assessments were calculated for Mound Visions 2nd Addition. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:pry Enclosure sAmain:Wlou 13646:\Correspondence~mayor 11-21 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 ° fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com -5158- CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 City of Mound Improvement Project 2002 Mound Visions 2nd Addition MFRA #13646 ADD Item 1. Post Indicator Valves (PIV) 2. Post Indicator Valves (PIV) TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER Quantity 2 3 Unit Price $2,900.00/EA $2,000.00/EA ADD Total $ 5,800.00 $ 6,00O.00 $ 11,800.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 296,146.25 $ 4,807.50 $ 5,378.18 $ 11,800.00 $ 318,131.93 APPROVED: CITY OF MOUND BY: DATE: ACCEPTED: DOBOSZENSKI & SONS, INC. DATE: RECOMMENDED: IvlFRA DATE: -~ Z~', ~"~, ~-) ~ s:kmainAmou 13646kspecs\changegorderg3 -5159- CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 City of Mound Improvement Project 2002 Mound Visions 2nd Addition MFRA #13646 ADD 1. Post Indicator Valves (PIV) 2. Post Indicator Valves (PIV) TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER .Quantity 2 .3 Unit Price $2,900.00/EA $2,000.00/EA ADD Total $ 5,800.00 $ 6,0OO.00 $ 11,800.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 296,146.25 $ 4,807.50 $ 5,378.18 $ 11,800.00 $ 318,131..93 APPROVED: CITY OF MOUND BY: DATE: ACCEPTED: DOBOSZENSKI & SONS, INC. DATE: ///~.~l-O ~ RECOMMENDED: MYRA BY: DATE: s:XmainAmou 13646~specs\changegorderg3 -5160- CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 City of Mound Improvement Project 2002 Mound Visions 2nd Addition MFRA #13646 ADD 1. Post Indicator Valves (PIV) 2. Post Indicator Valves (PIV) TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER Quantity 2 3 Unit Price $2,900.00/EA $2,000.00/EA ADD Total $ 5,800.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 11,800.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 296,146.25 $ 4,807.50 $ 5,378.18 $ 11,800.00 $ 318,131.93 APPROVED: CITY OF MOUND BY: DATE: ACCEPTED: DOBOSZENSKI & SONS, INC. DATE: RECOMMENDED: MFRA s:kmainAmou 13646kspecs\changegorder~3 -5161 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02- RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2002 (MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION) - LEVY #15605 WHEREAS, a petition and waiver agreement dated February 12, 2002, by and between the City of Mound (the "City") and Mound Marketplace, LLC, and The Village By the Bay Development, LLC (collectively "Developer") was duly signed and executed; and WHEREAS, this agreement addresses the handling of special assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.00 and Laws 2001, Chapter 207, Section 12. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2003, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,2003. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of November, 2002. and seconded by Councilmember Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -5162- Engineering" Planning ° Surveying November 20, 2002 Ms. Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk City of Mound . 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Improvement Project 2002 (Mound Visions 2nd Addition) Proposed Assessment Spread MFRA 4/13646 Dear Bonnie: As you are aware, Metro Plains entered into a Consent and Waiver Agreement with the City, where they agreed to be specially assessed for certain public improvements at "Village by the Bay" and "Mound Marketplace." The original amount in that agreement was $712,675.45. This figure was an estimate that has now been reduced to an assessable amount of $561,675.45. The following is a breakdown of the individual items included in the amount to be assessed: TOTAL PROJECT COSTS TO BE ASSESSED 1. Public Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Watermain 2. Purchase and Installation of Playground Equipment 3. Streetscape (CSAH 15 and CSAH 110) 4. Curb and Driveway Aprons (CSAH 15 and CSAH 110) 5. Turn Lane (CSAH 15) 6. Park Irrigation Total Cost to be assessed $320,000.00 $ 37,675.45 $140,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 36,000.00 $561,675.45 -5163- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-ma//: mfra@mfra, com Ms. Bonnie Ritter November 20, 2002 Page 2 These costs have been divided between "Village by the Bay" and "Mound Marketplace" as follows: Item Village by the Bay Mound Marketplace 1. Public Utilities $118,400.00 (37%) $ 201,600.00 (73%) 2. Playground Equipment $ 37,675.45 $ 0.00 3. Streetscape $ 0.00 $140,000.00 4. Curb and Aprons $ 0.00 $ 18,000.00 5. Turn Lane $ 0.00 $ 10,000.00 6. Park Irrigation $ 36,000.00 $ 0.00 Total $192,075.45 $ 369,600.00 The full amount of $369,600.00 to be assessed against "Mound Marketplace" should be levied against Lot 1, Block 1, Mound Visions 2nd Addition, PID 14-117-24 41 0062. The $192,075.45 to be assessed to "Village by the Bay" was spread equally between the 99 residential units, resulting in an assessment of $1,940.16 per unit. The buildings in each of the platted lots contain from three to seven units, which are identified by single PID numbers. The following is a breakdown of the total amount of the assessment that should be levied against each tax parcel in "Village by the Bay": PID 14-117-24 41 0063 14-117-24 41 0064 14-117-24 41 0065 14-117-24 41 0066 14-117-24 41 0067 14-117-24 41 0068 14-117-24 41 0069 14-117-24 41 0070 14-117-24 41 0071 14-117-24 41 0072 14-117-24 41 0073 14-117-24 41 0074 14-117-24 41 0075 14-117-24 41 0076 Description Lot 1 Block 2 Lot 1 Block 3 Lot 1 Block 4 Lot 1 Block 5 Lot 2 Block 5 Lot 1 Block 6 Lot 1 Block 7 Lot 1 Block 8 Lot 1 Block 9 Lot 1 Block Lot 1 Block Lot 1 Block Lot 1 Block Lot 1 Block Total "Village by the Bay" Assessment Number of Units 10 11 12 13 14 Total Assessment 20 $ 38,803.20 20 $ 38,803.20 5 $ 9,700.80 4 $ 7,760.64 4 $ 7,760.64 3 $ 5,820.48 6 $ 11,640.96 6 $ 11,640.96 6 $ 11,640.96 6 $ 11,640.96 4 $ 7,760.64 4 $ 7,760.64 4 $ 7,760.64 7 $ 13,581.12 $192,075.84 -5164- Ms. Bonnie Ritter November 20, 2002 Page ~ If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth CC~ John Dean, Kennedy & Graven Larry Olson, Metro Plains Development Larissa Tadavarthy, Metro Plains Development s:~main:h-nou 13646\correspondenceXritter I 1-20 -5165- Page 1 of 1 Kandis M Hanson From: To: Sent: Attach: Subject: "Dean Lotter" <dlotter@ci.minnetrista.mn.us> <KandisHanson@cityofmou nd.corn>; <moundflredept@hotmail.com> Friday, November 22, 2002 12:02 PM LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING Minnetrista Second Rvision.doc Letter of Understanding Here is the revised Letter of Understanding. I spoke with Mayor Fischer about this lietter and we considered the feedback from the Mound Staff and Mayor. The enclosed version of the Letter of Understanding is what we feel is the necessary language that we need from Mound. Please present to your council and contact me with feedback. I mentioned to Chief Peterson that I was willing to attend the meeting if you felt it necessary. He mentioned that you will be having a lot of budget discussions at that meeting and you may not get to this item until late. Either way, please let me know if I should attend or not. Thank you! <<LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING Minnetrista Second Rvision.doc>> Dean Lotter Minnetrista City Administrator - 5166- 11/22/02 LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING FIRE SERVICES MOUND AND MINNETRISTA Pursuant to recent meetings held between the City of Minnetrista and the City of Mound regarding fire services, the following is a letter of understanding highlighting the areas of clarification and agreement. It is understood that the City of Mound wishes to charge a portion of their new fire station to their customers. Minnetrista will agree to pay for their portion of the new Mound Fire Station. Minnetrism intends on building satellite fire stations. Minnetrista would like to explore the possibility of having Mound staff these satellite fire stations and also pay a portion of the fire station costs. 3. Both parties will agree to fund the infrastructure in either community via the funding formula in the current contract. It is the intent of Mound and Minnetrista to form a fire district. Mound and Minnetrista will research the feasibility of such a district within the next two years. Approved by the Mound City Council on the day of ,2002. Pat Meisel, Mound Mayor Approved by the Minnetrista City Council on the day of ,2002. Cheryl Fischer, Minnetrista Mayor -5167- Engineering · Planning · Surveying November 21, 2002 Honorable Mayor and Member of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Street Reconstruction Policies MFRA #13276 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Enclosed for your review is version two of the proposed Street Reconstruction Policies. It contains revisions discussed at the November 12, 2002 Council meeting. If you have any questions or need additional information, I will be in attendance at the November 26th meeting. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth s:Xmain:Xmou 13276\correspondenceXmayor&councill 1-21 -5168- 15050 23rd Avenue North o Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra, corn CITY OF MOUND STREET RECONSTRUCTION POLICIES INDEX 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. PURPOSE GENERAL DEFINITIONS COUNTY ROADS MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS MAJOR STREETS LOCAL STREETS ASSESSMENT POLICIES ASSESSMENT FORMULAS DRAFT - VERSION 2 1 11/19/02 -5169- 1.01 e 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 3.01 PURPOSE The purpose of policies is to establish a guideline and procedures for the reconstruction of streets within the City of Mound. GENERAL This policy relates to roadway improvements eligible to be assessed under authorization of Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429. Three basic criteria must be satisfied before a particular parcel can be assessed. They are: mo The land must have received special benefit from the improvement. The amount of the assessment must not exceed the special benefit. The assessment must be uniform in relation to the same class of property within the assessment area. Assessable roadway improvement projects shall conform with the procedural requirements of Chapter 429 which generally are as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Project Initiation by Petition or Council Resolution Resolution Ordering Preparation of Engineers Report Resolution Approving Engineers Feasibility Report and Ordering a Hearing Publication and Individual Notification of Heating Public Hearing Resolution Ordering Improvement Resolution Ordering the Preparation of Assessment Roll Public Notice of Hearing on Assessments Assessment Hearing Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll Filing of Assessments with Hennepin County In addition to special assessments, other sources of funds are available to the City for street purposes, depending on the type of project involved. DEFINITIONS The City of Mound contains various type of roadways. Descriptions of the City' s street classifications are outlined as follows: Thoroughfares These are important traffic routes which provide community continuity and interconnect the City with neighboring communities. They are usually spaced at one mile intervals, although they may be closer in DRAFT- VERSION 2 2 11/19/02 -5170- e 4.01 4.02 more heavily developed areas. When upgraded these roadways will generally have 80'-100' rights-of-way and be of sufficient design to handle anticipated traffic. Collectors Streets which are designed to collect traffic from individual properties and feed into thoroughfares. They have 60-80' rights-of-way with 7 or 9 ton capacity and are generally spaced at one-half mile intervals. Local Relatively short streets which provide access to individual lots in interior areas of development. Minimum right of way is 30-60'. Cul-de-sac Dead-end streets usually designed with a maximum length of 500' and a turn around area of 30'-80' diameter at the property line. They generally are constructed in interior residential developments. Service Road Streets which run parallel and adjacent to a high volume roadway. They are designed to serve individual properties along streets where it is desirable to control access. Alley Roadways which are generally 12-20 feet in right-of-way width which service properties on the rear property line. COUNTY ROADS The county roads in Mound are: CSAH 15 (Shoreline Boulevard and Lynwood Boulevard) CSAH 110 (Commerce Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard) CSAH 44 (West Edge Boulevard) CSAH 125 (Wilshire Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard) The total mileage of County Roads in Mound is approximately 7-1/4 miles. These roads were originally designed as part of the County's highway system and were meant to link rural areas with the urban centers. As Mound developed, these roads have become an important part of the network of City streets. However, many of these County roads need to be upgraded in order to facilitate present and future traffic demand. Since this type of improvement is needed in part because of increased urban use it has been the County policy to share the cost of the project with the City. Costs shared in this manner include: Right-of-way Acquisition Curb and Gutter Traffic Controls DRAFT - VERSION 2 3 11/19/02 -5171 - 4. Storm Drainage 4.03 Payment of the City portion of projects may be assessed and/or paid by City funds. 5. MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS 5.01 Regulations allow a municipality to designate up to 20% of its existing street mileage, excluding County State Aid Highways and State Trunk Highways as MSA streets. The City of Mound currently has approximately 8 miles designated as MSA streets. The City receives MSA funds on an annual basis which are allotted for maintenance and construction of MSA streets. This money is part of the gasoline tax collected in Minnesota and is apportioned to the community according to state guidelines based on population and road needs. Maintenance funds are sent automatically to the City each year while the construction funds are held in an account by the State until such time construction contracts are awarded. 5.02 The following are MSA streets: Street Tuxedo Boulevard Three Points Boulevard Lynwood Boulevard Fairview Lane Grandview Boulevard Bartlett Boulevard Wilshire Boulevard Cypress Lane Maywood Road Hidden Vale Lane Brighton Boulevard Highland Boulevard Idlewood Road Ridgewood Road Auditors Road Belmont Lane Leslie Road Devon Lane Bradford Lane From Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Lynwood Boulevard Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15) Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Bartlett Boulevard Maywood Road Cypress Lane Maywood Road Tuxedo Boulevard Bartlett Boulevard (CSAH 110) Highland Boulevard Idlewood Road Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Brighton Boulevard Leslie Road Devon Lane To Minnetrista Border Glen Elyn Road Fairview Lane Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Hidden Vale Lane Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Idlewood Road Ridgewood Road West Edge Boulevard (CSAH 44) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Lynwood Boulevard Devon Lane Bradford Lane Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Cottonwood Lane Maywood Road Non-Existent Roads on MSA System Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Belmont Lane Cypress Lane DRAFT - VERSION 2 4 11/19/02 -5172- 5.03 6.01 6.02 7.01 7.02 7.03 It is not the intent of the State Aid Funding Program to totally finance the MSA system. Rather, it is designed to assist communities with street construction projects in an effort to improve the roadway system state wide. Therefore, when an MSA street is constructed or upgraded, assessments will be levied in accordance with the policies for major streets. The assessment rate will reflect the benefit conveyed by the improved design, additional width, and curb and gutter, and these rates will be set by the City Council on recommendation of the City Engineer. MAJOR STREETS Major streets are considered by the City of Mound to be collector and thoroughfare streets. Streets of this variety generally service local traffic as well as traffic from other areas and therefore are designed in accordance with standards of a higher road capacity. Major streets within the City of Mound are constructed with a minimum capacity of 9 ton per axle. The primary source of funding for major roadways is special assessments and MSA funds. Major new and reconstructed streets shall be constructed with curb and gutter. Street width shall be determined by existing conditions, traffic counts and patterns, and, if applicable, MSA standards. LOCAL STREETS Local Streets are generally streets which service a small area and do not typically involve a movement of traffic between areas. Local streets typically connect two collector streets or county roads. Streets of this type include streets, cul-de-sacs, and service roads. Local streets within the City of Mound are constructed with a minimum capacity of 5 tons per axle. The primary source of funding of local streets is special assessments. New local streets shall be constructed with curb and gutter. When reconstructing streets concrete curb and gutter shall be installed in the following instances: All streets with existing concrete curb and gutter or existing vertical asphalt curb. All Municipal State Aid streets. Local streets without curb and gutter. New local street minimum, unobstructed street width, (back to back of curb) is 28 feet. The standard unobstructed street width for reconstructed streets shall be 28 feet. Streets which do not meet this requirement shall be reconstructed at current width (unless a wider street is desired by the affected residents) but not less than twenty-four feet (24') unless the Council finds that: A twenty-four foot (24') width would adversely affect trees or other significant or desirable physical features: and DRAFT - VERSION 2 5 11/19/02 -5173- 7.04 ge 8.01 8.02 8.093 8.094 A reduced width would not constitute a distinct hazard to life or property. Factors to be considered shall include, but not limited to, safe access of emergency vehicles, snow storage requirements, availability of parking, and aesthetics. Streets which are over twenty-eight feet (28') in width will may have.parking allowed on both sides. Streets less than twenty-eight feet (28') in width may will be subject to parking restrictions on one side. Parking restrictions could be established at the time of street projects or at any future date based upon general City parking requirements. Factors to be considered shall include, but not be limited to, staff report regarding safety and emergency vehicles access and neighborhood input. Where streets are less than twenty-eight (28') in width, the staff shall assist the neighborhood in identifying areas where existing street width can be increased to provide additional parking. ASSESSMENT POLICIES When assessments are levied for roadway improvements, the assessment will be calculated in accordance with the formulas set forth in the section on Assessment Formulas, using a unit method. The per unit (parcel) assessment will apply equally to all parcels of land within the improvement area. This assessment method is typically used in areas where the parcels are of a similar shape and size, or in cases where the benefit received by a property is the same for parcels of varying shapes and sizes, w~':c This The unit method will be used for assessment purposes unless the poMot/m~ combination front foot, area and unit method is requested by petition by at least 55% of the assessed property owners and/or it is determined that the affected lots have do not received equal benefits. The City Council shall have final authority on the type of formulas to be used. The total project cost for streets constructed or reconstructed in any given project shall be equal to the actual construction cost, plus associated costs such as legal, fiscal, administrative and engineering. When the City CONSTRUCTS A NEW LOCAL OR MAJOR STREET, 100% of the total projects cost, including all utilities, will be recovered by assessing the benefiting property for actual benefit received. A new street shall be defined as a roadway including curb and gutter which had not previously existed. DRAFT- VERSION 2 6 11/19/02 -5174- 8.045 8.056 8.067 8.0~t8 8.09 8.0810 When the City RECONSTRUCTS AN EXISTING LOCAL OR MAJOR STRIEET, 2/3 of the total project cost will be recovered by assessing the benefiting property for benefit received. The remaining 1/3 shall be absorbed by the City. A reconstructed street shall be defined as a roadway which existed previously. The addition of concrete curb and gutter when it did not previously exist will be assessed separately at 100% of the cost. When the City RECONSTRUCTS A MAJOR STREET ~-,-; ....... ~ .......... *: .-,..j ...... ,. ............. on or reconstruction is partially financed by State Aid Funds to improve the design and capacity, the adjoining properties will be charged an assessment equal to 2/3 of based-e~ the cost of an average local street reconstruction ccnsm:cden. The remainder to be paid by State Aid Funds or General Funds. The following assessment policies will apply for existing single family property when a major street is improved: Existing single-family residential property abutting two or four lane divided median roads will be assessed based on 1/4 of the cost of a standard local street as if built at the time of the assessment. Existing single-family residential property abutting two or four lane undivided roads will be assessed based on .11/2 2/3 of the cost of a standard local street as if built at the time of the assessment. Lots which are split subsequent to a roadway improvement project shall be assessed as if in existence at the time the assessment was adopted, using the formula used at the time of assessment plus interest as per current City policy from date of assessment. Commercial, industrial or multi-family parcels may be converted into an equivalent number of residential units by dividing the area of the parcel by 8,000 square feet (the average minimum lot size). This allows land use types of differing intensity to be assessed on a standard basis using the same assessment rate as single family properties. The following items are to be assessable as part of a reconstruction project cost: 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. Remove concrete curb and gutter Remove concrete pavement Remove/replace concrete steps Construct and reinforce concrete steps Remove concrete driveway pavement Remove/construct apron 6" thick concrete pavement (residential) Remove/construct apron 8" thick concrete pavement (commercial) Common excavation Core excavation DRAFT - VERSION 2 7 11/19/02 -5175- 8.911 8.4012 9.01 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Construct concrete C & G Design B-618 or surmountable Saw joint in concrete Adjust manholes Adjust catch basin Adjust gate valves Retaining wall Electric conduit Surfacing aggregate Class 5 100% crushed CUltured sod with 4" thick topsoil in place Clearing Grubbing Aggregate backfill Replacement of driveway aprons Construct concrete pedestrian ramps Full-depth asphalt milling and overlay Pavement reclamation Turf restoration The following items would not be included in a reconstruction project cost. The items will be billed directly or assessed to the benefited property: Sewer and water service line repairs Random 6-8" concrete pavement Random concrete sidewalk The following items will be paid at City expense when part of a reconstruction project: 2. 3. 4. Remove, replace or relocate hydrants Install hydrants and/or gate valves Sanitary sewer and watermains repair and replacement Storm sewer reconstruction or construction ASSESSMENT FORMULA The per unit (parcel) method of assessment is intended to simplify the process by assuming that all properties to be assessed will receive equal benefit. When the per unit method is used, the individual parcel assessment will be calculated as follows: ASSESSMENT = Total Proiect Cost Total Units Corner lots will only be assessed one unit. If the two streets are reconstructed at different times, the corner parcel shall be assessed one-half unit for each project. DRAFT - VERSION 2 8 11/19/02 -5176- 9.04-2 When :t:the combination front foot, area and unit method is used, the individual parcel assessment shall be calculated as follows: 30 percent of the total cost to be assessed based on front footage. Comer lots shall be calculated to include all front footage (front and sides). All lots shall be deemed to have at least a minimum of 40 front feet. ASSESSMENT = 30% of Project Cost Total Assessable Front Footage Assessable Front Footage of Lot 30 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on the square footage of the property to be assessed. ASSESSMENT = 30% of Project Cost x Total Assessable Area Assessable Area Of Lot 3. 40 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on a unit basis. ASSESSMENT = 40% of Project Cost Total Units 9.093 The following are additional factors to be considered when using the combination front foot, area and unit method ~-' '~ ............. ~ ~ ..... ~,~. Triangle Lots - lots that form a triangle on two streets are to be assessed for footage on the long side only. o Multiple units other than duplexes are assessed on the basis of 3/4 unit per each residential unit in the building (Example: a 50 unit apartment is assessed for 37.5 units plus footage plus areas). Lots that front on a County Road and a street improvement will be assessed on the same basis as other lots except that the units and square footage will be reduced by 50 percent. Area of land formerly commons and now under private ownership, to be assessed as part of the private property. o Large parcels (a number of combined lots) to be assessed one unit, plus area and footage. Two separate parcels under the same ownership will be assessed two units, DRAFT - VERSION 2 9 11/19/02 -5177- 9.03 o ° o 10. 11. 12. plus area and footage if they both have enough area to qualify as buildable sites under the present zoning. Single lots under separate ownership 'from adjacent property that do not meet the area requirements for a buildable site will be assessed only area and footage. Properties abutting alleys that are bituminous surface only, with no curb and gutter, to be assessed the same as any other property except the front footage will be reduced by 50% with a minimum of 40 lineal feet. Properties which have the garage located across the street from the house will be assessed on the same basis as other lots except the parcel in which the garage is located will not receive a unit charge. Lots that front on a street to be improved and which previously paid a full assessment on another street improvement project will be assessed for the footage only with no minimum. Parcels which do not abut a street improvement project but received the benefits from the construction will be assessed for the project. Lots that are adjacent to a 12' wide bituminous street installed for City purposes which front another street in the project will not be assessed for footage on the side street. Triangular lots that are combined with a rectangular lot are to be assessed for footage on the long side of the triangular lot plus the footage of the remaining lot or lots. 13. Duplexes are to be assessed on the basis of two units plus area and footage, with a minimum on the footage of 80 feet. 14. Lots that have streets on three sides are to be assessed for footage on the long side and the average length of the other two sides. 15. The cost of driveway entrances over 20 feet wide are assessed directly to the property owner. 16. Commercial or industrial property are assessed the same as residential property except for the unit charge where the assessment will be 1-1/2 units per parcel. 17. There is a maximum of 250 feet and 25,000 square feet per residential parcel. DRAFT - VERSION 2 10 11/19/02 -5178- 9.04 In certain unusual cases assessments may be determined by a "fair" comparison to other assessed property. This will be recommended by the City Engineer and approved by the City Council. s:Lraain:~nou13276~Reportskstreet reconstruction policies DRAFT - VERSION 2 11 11/19/02 -5179- Engineering · Planning ' Surveying November 21, 2002 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2002 Storm Sewer Improvements Change Order No. 1 MFRA #13677 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is a plan and bid proposal for a storm sewer improvement we are requesting be added as a change order, to the contract the City presently has with Dave Perkins Contracting. With the deduct for HDPE pipe, the amount of this change order would be $20,629. In the process of preparing for the ditch cleaning portion (Section 7) of the Storm Sewer Improvement Project, we discovered that the City did not have any easements on the private property containing a portion of the ditch adjacent to Dakota Rail. In discussions with John Dean it was also determined that the City could not claim an easement by use because this is registered property. The law does not allow the City an easement by use on Torrens property like it does on Abstract property. The property owner would not grant the City an easement for the existing ditch, in fact, he requested that storm sewer pipes be installed and eliminate the deep ditch. We determined that it would be better for both parties if we spent the money to install the storm sewer and fill the ditch, then to go through the legal process and expense to obtain an easement, probably requiring condemnation. The property owner is willing to give the City a permanent drainage and storm sewer easement, at no cost, in exchange for eliminating the ditch and installing storm sewer pipe. We also need a permanent easement from the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority; however as you will note from the attached letter and easement document, they are requesting payment of $2,138 for the permanent easement. This easement document is on the Hennepin County Board's agenda for November 26. The Regional Railroad Authority staff has recommended that the Board grant the easement to the City. 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com -5180- Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager November 21, 2002 Page 2 The City's Storm Sewer Utility Fund contains sufficient funds to cover the cost of this change order. This additional work will finally solve a problem that has plagued the City and this property since 1992. Greg Skinner and I are recommending approval of the change order in the amount of $20,629 for the work as proposed. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:pry Enclosure cc: Greg Skinner, Public Works Superintendent, City of Mound s:kmain:'dVlou 13677:\Correspondencekhanson I 1-21 -5181 - ~M BID PRoPoSAL CI-I, ANGE OR_DER NO. 1 DAKOTA RAIL/COTTONWOOD LANE 2002' STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS. 1. 15" RCP - Class 2. 33" RCP - Class 3, 33" Flared End With Trash Guard & Riprap ' 4, 48"Catch Basin 5. 72" Catch Basin Manhole 6. Tree and Stump Removal '" 7, Grading, including Fill Material & Top Soil 8, Seed and Mulch. 9.. Service Berry ('Regent) 5 Gallon 10. Arcadia Juniper 2 Gallon Total Bid QUANTITY 54' LF 1 E^ 1 EA '1 EA 1 LS 1 LS 3 EA 5 EA i~ Dave Perkins ContracUng I~, 14230 Basalt St. N.W. Ramsey, MN 55303 .UNit PRICE TOTAL ,9¢~ "~/EA $ /¢0o~' ~. ~S BAS ~ r~A $ I'~;*'~ 3677 -5182- :::::;:~r r~r~r::~: :::::::;; ::::::::: ::::::: ::::::::: ;:.*:::::: ::::::::::::iii i::ii::i::::i ::i::::ii::::i i::iii::ill i::::::::::::: ::!:::::::::::::: ii::ii::iil ::ii::ilili :: ::.~::.::::~ ::~:::::: ~:::: :::~: I~:',~::::::: ::::::~::::~:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ......... , .................. ~ .................................................f :::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::~::~::::~:: ~:::: ~ ~ ~::~ ,~ ~ ~ :: ~ :: :: :: } ~ :: ~,~::::~ ::~}~:::: :~ :::" ~::~::::~ :: :: :: ~ :: :: :: :: ~ :: ~ :: :: ~ :: :: :: :: ~:::::::: ::::::o: ~:::: ::::::::: l:l~:dt:~::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::~:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::~::::~:::::::: ::::~::::::::~ ::::::::: ::::::~: ::::::::: :::::::): ::: : ':: ::':~::: :":::::: ::::::::: ::~::::~ ::::~::~::::~::~ ~ ::::~ ~ ~ ~ :: :::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::= ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~::::::~::::~ ~::::::::::~:::: ::::~::::::::~:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ ~~~~ ::~::::::::::::~ ~::::::~ :: ~ :: .................................. ~ .... ~ ~.~ ~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:::: ::::~:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: : :: ,,,~' ::: ::::: ~ ~ HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320, Minneapolis, MN 55401-1362 (612) 348-9260 FAX: (612) 348-9710 November 14, 2002 Mr. John Cameron MFRA 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 Re: Easement for Storm Sewer Line, West of Cottonwood Lane. Mound, MN Dear Mr. Cameron: I have enclosed the easement for the referenced storm sewer line. Please have the City of Mound sign and notarize the easement and return it to me for final approval at the next Railroad Authority meet, November 26, 2002. I will need the signed copy back in my office ASAP to meet the November 26, 2002 schedule. The cost of the easement will be $2,138.00. Payable to the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority. If you have any question please call me at 612-348-8089. Sincerely, Larry L. Odell / Right of Way and Special Projects Peter McLaughlin Gail Dorfman Mark Stenglein Mary Tambornino Chair Vice Chair Secretary Treasurer BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mike Opat Randy Johnson Penny Steele -5184- Agreement No. 73-37522 Easement Agreement (Storm Sewer at Cottonwood Lane) WHEREAS, GRANTOR is the owner of certain right of way (by fee, easement, license, joint use agreement, governmental grant or other interest) commonly referred to as the Dakota Rail Corridor (Corridor); WHEREAS, GRANTOR acquired the Corridor for transportation uses, including without limitation, for freight rail, light rail and other future transportation uses. WHEREAS, GRANTEE desires to construct a Storm Sewer Line, and appurtenances thereto along the northerly ten feet of the right of way line of the Corridor for a distance of one- hundred fifty (1 50) feet westerly of Cottonwood Lane in Mound, Minnesota, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT made ,2002, by and between the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA), a political subdivision and local government unit, under the laws of the State of Minnesota ("GRANTOR"), and the City of Mound, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, ("GRANTEE"), to-wit: GRANTOR, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR from GRANTEE, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants unto GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a non- exclusive easement for a storm sewer line and related appurtenances (herein after referred to as "Storm Sewer Line"), over, under and across the Easement Area as depicted on Exhibit A, and described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA That'part of the north 10.00 feet of the railroad right-of-way across the South Half of Section 14, Township 11 7, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 40, "LYNWOLD PARK, LAKE MINNETONKA," according to the duly recorded plat thereof, and the southerly extension of the east line of Cottonwood Lane as dedicated in said plat. 1 -5185- Said easement is limited solely to a Storm Sewer Line and shall expire automatically if no~ used for those purposes for a period of six consecutive months at which time GRANTEE shall deliver to GRANTOR a release of the easement suitable for recordation. GRANTEE's Storm Sewer Line shall not interfere with use of the Corridor for freight rail, light rail and all other future transportation uses including, without limitation, freight rail, light rail, bus, bicycle and foot travel, and for locating communication facilities, including fiber optics lines. In the event that use of the Corridor for future transportation uses requires modification or relocation of the Storm Sewer Line, said modification or relocation shall be at GRANTEE's sole cost, and not at GRANTOR's cost. GRANTEE shall relocate its Storm Sewer Line upon ninety (90) days written notice from GRANTOR. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Agreement, GRANTEE'S obligations regarding relocation contained in this section shall prevail. Prior to construction of the Storm Sewer Line and prior to any modification or relocation located within the Easement Area, Grantee shall submit its plans to Grantor for review and comment. GRANTOR reserves the right to reject any plans for construction proposed by GRANTEE on the grounds, in GRANTOR'S sole discretion, that said plans are inappropriate or incompatible with its future use of the Corridor. The rights granted herein may be exercised at any time subsequent to the execution of this document. GRANTEE agrees to indemnify, defend and hold GRANTOR and its officers, directors and employees harmless from and against all liability, loss, cost, damage or expense of every nature including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, whether or not suit be brought, resulting from injury to or death of persons or loss or destruction to property which arises out of or in any way is connected with or incident to the exercise of GRANTEE'S rights on, over, and across the Easement Area. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision does not waive GRANTEE's statutory and common-law rights to limitations on liability, and Grantee shall not be liable for that portion of liability, loss, cost, damage, or expense arising from the intentional or negligent act or omission by Grantor or, their officers, agents, employees, contractors, invitees, successors, or assigns. GRANTEE hereby covenants and warrants that it shall not use, employ, deposit, store, dispose of, place or otherwise release on the Easement Area, in connection with the exercise of its rights under this Easement, any hazardous substance, hazardous waste or pollutant or contaminant, as such terms are defined under any federal, state or local statute, ordinance, rule, code or regulation. GRANTEE agrees to indemnify defend and hold GRANTOR and its successors and assigns harmless against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage or expense resulting from or due to the release of or threatened release of hazardous substances, hazardous wastes or any pollutants or contaminants which were, or are claimed or alleged to have been used, employed, deposited, stored, disposed of, placed or otherwise released on or 2 -5186- from the Easement Area by GRANTEE, its employees, agents, contractors or representatives. GRANTOR reserves the right to use and occupy the Easement Area and shall have the right to agree to other occupations of the same premises by one or more persons or firms, provided, however, such uses shall not unreasonably interfere with the easement rights granted hereunder. GRANTOR is not responsible for the maintenance, or construction, of GRANTEE'S facilities in the Easement Area. The rights herein granted are subject to existing rights of way, whether or not of record, for highway, roads, railroads, pipelines, canals, laterals, ditches and fiber optic, electrical or other transmission lines, and should it, at any time, become necessary because of GRANTEE's use of the Easement Area to relocate any of said facilities by reason of GRANTEE'S exercise of the rights granted herein, GRANTEE, and not GRANTOR, shall bear and pay the cost of so doing. 10. GRANTEE also accepts said Easement Area subject to any want or failure at any time of GRANTOR's title to said Easement Area or any part thereof and GRANTEE shall assume any damages sustained by GRANTEE in connection therewith. GRANTEE also accepts such Easement Area subject to rights of any party, including GRANTOR, in and to any roadways, easements, leases and permits, whether granted, at GRANTOR's sole discretion, either prior to or after the date of this Easement Agreement except that any subsequent grant shall not unreasonably interfere with GRANTEE'S use of the Easement Area. 11. GRANTEE agrees to provide to GRANTOR or other tenants of GRANTOR access over and through the Easement Area should such access be deemed necessary by GRANTOR. GRANTEE accepts said Easement Area subject to the right of GRANTOR, its employees, agents, permittees, lessees, and contractors when reasonably necessary to walk upon said Easement Area to repair adjacent property and the right of GRANTOR, its employees, agents, permittees, lessees, and contractors 1~o temporarily place equipment upon the property when reasonably necessary for the purpose of maintaining, repairing, inspecting or constructing upon GRANTOR's property. 12. It is mutually understood and agreed that this instrument covers all the agreements and stipulations between the parties and that no representation or statements, verbal or written, have been made modifying, adding to or changing the terms hereof. This instrument is exempt from the Minnesota Deed Tax. 3 -5187- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day of ,2002. Approved as to form and execution: HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY Assistant County Attorney By: Chair of Its Board of Commissioners Approved as to form and execution: Attorney for Mound And; Its Deputy/Executive Director Attest: Deputy/Clerk of Its Board CITY OF MOUND By: Its: Mayor By: Its: By: Its: City organized under: Plan A Plan B Charter This Instrument was drafted by: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority 417 North 5th St., Suite 320 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1 362 4 -5188- STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ) SS The foregoing was acknowledged before me this . day of , 2002, by and Its Chair of Its Board and Deputy/Executive . Director, respectively, of Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority, a political subdivision and local government unit under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ) SS The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2002, by and Its Mayor and Its , respectively, of the City of Mound, a political subdivision and local government unit under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City, as their free act and deed. Notary Public 5 -5189- EXHIBIT A [ 14-! i ~--..'+-~-OOz~ '2' J .. ~O,...L!N~cr~ ~TAL ~ t ~ I ~ z~ I [] ~ SCALE: 1" = ~0' " ' ] l~ i MFRA MOU13677 ~ ~ I 1~-117=2~-~-0022 I ,,' i LYNWOOD BLVd. ', I a~O~T ~. HICHA _ ~ ~ J /~ / UT/L/ ...... ~'-~ f' ~ ~<O , ~v ....... ~ ~- ' t ........... FD 1/2" P I t~ j ~ 1~-117-2~-3~-0050 , McCLOUD CO. REG. RR ~3~- cup I AUTHORITY i ~ - INV=932.~ -5190- Agreement No. 73-37522 Easement Agreement (Storm Sewer at Cottonwood Lane) WHEREAS, GRANTOR is the owner of certain right of way (by fee, easement, license, joint use agreement, governmental grant or other interest) commonly referred to as the Dakota Rail Corridor (Corridor); WHEREAS, GRANTOR acquired the Corridor for transportation uses, including without limitation, for freight rail, light rail and other future transportation uses. WHEREAS, GRANTEE desires to construct a Storm Sewer Line, and appurtenances thereto along the northerly ten feet of the right of way line of the Corridor for a distance of one- hundred fifty (150) feet westerly of Cottonwood Lane in Mound, Minnesota, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT made , 2002, by and between the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA), a political subdivision and local government Unit, under the laws of the State of MinneSota ("GRANTOR"), and the City of Mound, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, ("GRANTEE"), to-wit: GRANTOR, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTOR from GRANTEE, receipt of which is acknowledged, grants unto GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, a non- exclusive easement for a storm sewer line and related appurtenances (herein after referred to as "Storm Sewer Line"), over, under and across the Easement Area as depicted on Exhibit A, and described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA That part of the north 10.00 feet of the railroad right-of-way across the South Half of Section 14, Township 117, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 40, "LYNW©LD PARK, LAKE MINNETONKA," according to the duly recorded plat thereof, and the southerly extension of the east line of Cottonwood Lane as dedicated in said plat. 1 -5191 - Said easement is limited solely to a Storm Sewer Line and shall expire automatically if not used for those purposes for a period of six consecutive months at which time GRANTEE shall deliver to GRANTOR a release of the easement suitable for recordation. GRANTEE's Storm Sewer Line shall not interfere with use of the Corridor for freight rail, light rail and all other future transportation uses including, without limitation, freight rail, light rail, bus, bicycle and foot travel, and for locating communication facilities, including fiber optics lines. In the event that use of the Corridor for future transportation uses requires modificatio'n or relocation of the Storm Sewer Line, said modification or relocation shall be at GRANTEE's sole cost, and not at GRANTOR's cost. GRANTEE shall relocate its Storm Sewer Line upon ninety (90) days written notice from GRANTOR. Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Agreement, GRANTEE'S obligations regarding relocation contained in this section shall prevail. Prior to construction of the Storm Sewer Line and prior to any modification or. relocation located within the Easement Area, Grantee shall submit its plans to Grantor for review and comment. GRANTOR reserves the right to reject any plans for construction proposed by 'GRANTEE on the grounds, in GRANTOR's sole discretion, that said plans are inappropriate or incompatible with its future use of the Corridor. The rights granted herein may be exercised at any time subsequent to the execution of this document. GRANTEE agrees to indemnify, defend and hold GRANTOR and its officers, directors and employees harmless from and against all liability, loss, cost, damage or expense of every nature including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, whether or not suit be brought, resulting from injury to or death of persons or loss or destruction to property which arises out of or in any way is connected with or incident to the exercise of GRANTEE'S rights on, over, and across the Easement Area. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision does not waive GRANTEE's statutory and common-law rights to limitations on liability, and Grantee shall not be liable for that portion of liability, loss, cost, damage, or expense arising from the intentional or negligent act or omission by Grantor or, their officers, agents, employees, contractors, invitees, successors, or assigns. GRANTEE hereby covenants and warrants that it shall not use, employ, deposit, store, dispose of, place or otherwise release on the Easement Area, in connection with the exercise of its rights under this Easement, any hazardous substance, hazardous waste or pollutant or contaminant, as such terms are defined under any federal, state or local statute, ordinance, rule, code or regulation. GRANTEE agrees to indemnify defend and hold GRANTOR and its successors and assigns harmless against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage or expense resulting from or due to the release of or threatened release of hazardous substances, hazardous wastes or any pollutants or contaminants which were, or are claimed or alleged to have been used, employed, deposited, stored, disposed of, placed or otherwise released on or 2 -5192- from the Easement Area by GRANTEE, its employees, agents, oontractors or representatives. GRANTOR reserves the right to use and occupy the Easement Area and shall have the right to agree to other occupations of the same premises by one or more persons or firms, provided, however, such uses shall not unreasonably interfere with the easement rights granted hereunder. GRANTOR is not responsible for the maintenance, or construction, of GRANTEE'S facilities in the Easement Area. The rights herein granted are subject to existing rights of way, whether or not of record, for highway, roads, railroads, pipelines, canals, laterals, ditches and fiber optic, electrical or other transmission lines, and should it, at any time, become necessary because of GRANTEE's use of the Easement Area to relocate any of said facilities by reason of GRANTEE'S exercise of the rights granted herein, GRANTEE, and not GRANTOR, shall bear and pay the cost of so doing. 10. GRANTEE also accepts said Easement Area subject to any want or failure at any time of GRANTOR's title to said Easement Area or any part thereof and GRANTEE shall assume any damages sustained by GRANTEE in connection therewith. GRANTEE also accepts such Easement Area subject to rights of any party, including GRANTOR, in and to any roadways, easements, leases and permits, whether granted, at GRANTOR's sole discretion, either prior to or after the date of this Easement Agreement except that any subsequent grant shall not unreasonably interfere with GRANTEE'S use of the Easement Area. 11. GRANTEE agrees to provide to GRANTOR or other tenants of GRANTOR access over and through the Easement Area should such access be deemed necessary by GRANTOR. GRANTEE accepts said Easement Area subject to the right of GRANTOR, its employees, agents, permittees, lessees, and contractors when reasonably necessary to walk upon said Easement Area to repair adjacent property and the right of GRANTOR, its employees, agents, permittees, lessees, and contractors to temporarily place equipment upon the property when reasonably necessary for the purpose of maintaining, repairing, inspecting or constructing upon GRANTOR's property. 12. It is mutually understood and agreed that this instrument covers all the agreements and stipulations between the parties and that no representation or statements, verbal or written, have been made modifying, adding to or changing the terms hereof. This instrument is exempt from the Minnesota Deed Tax. 3 -5193- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day of ,2002. Approved as to form and execution: HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY Assistant County Attorney By: Chair of Its Board of Commissioners Approved as to form and execution: Attorney for Mound And' Its Deputy/Executive Director Attest: Deputy/Clerk of Its Board CITY OF MOUND By: Its: Mayor By: Its: By: its: City organized under: Plan A Plan B Charter This Instrument was drafted by: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority 417 North 5th St., Suite 320 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1362 4 -5194- STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ) SS The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 2002, by and Its Chair of Its Board and Deputy/Executive Director, respectively, of Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority, a political subdivision and local government unit under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ) ss The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of ,2002, by and Its Mayor and Its , respectively, of the City of Mound, a political subdivision and local government unit under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the City, as their free act and deed. Notary Public 5 -5195- EXHIBIT A u [*Vi D'~LL~I~t.~C.~ ~ , · ,, . ,, · ' ",, I SCOTT E. PiCHA _ : %m x ¢=~--~--~ ................... FD 1/2" P , 24-3~-uOou McCLOUD CO. REG. SCALE: 1" = ~0' MFRA MOU136 ;-/7 LYNWOOD BLV.D. ! 'i i i~-3G' CMP 0"t~TM ° '" ' AUTHORITY I 1. CL OF RAIL ROAD TRACKS AS Of- _---/ ~ "'-'-'"'08' RC~ OCTOBER, 2002 INV=932.~/ -5196- Page 1 of 5 Kandis M Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12. mn.us> Friday, November 08, 2002 1:10 PM Westonka. news Westonka.news Vol. 3, No. 8 November 8, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. Westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. **Please note: Westonka.news will not be published next Friday, November 15. Contents I. News Briefs --Teacher Workshop Day Provides Important Training --Be a Prepared Parent: Learn More About Eating Disorders and Depression 2. Focus Topic: Adult Basic Education: Helping People Become Self-Sufficient and Employable 3. Upcoming Events 4. How Are We Doing? NEWS BRIEFS ** Teacher Workshop Day Provides Important Training** Today, November 8, is a Teacher Workshop Day, and Westonka teachers have a full schedule of activities related to student instruction and support. Activities in each building include: --primary school teachers at Hilltop and Shirley Hills are: completing Quarter 1 student report cards; receiving follow-up training on the Six Traits of Writing; and discussing preparation for the Grade 3 Minnesota -5'197- 11/20/02 Page 2 of 5 Comprehensive Assessments (MCA) in Reading and Math. --Grandview employees are meeting with staff from Youth Frontiers, an organization whose mission is to "transform communities by improving school climate." Westonka has partnered with Youth Frontiers for several years to provide student retreats focusing on kindness and respect. --high school teachers are: learning about teen depression and suicide prevention; studying the specifications for the Grade 10 MCA in Reading; digging further into the Six Traits of Writing; and working with their colleagues in departmental activities. **Be a Prepared Parent: Learn More About Eating Disorders and Depression** On Monday, November 18, specialists from Methodist Hospital, St. Louis Park, will give a one-hour overview of facts, insights, ideas, resources, etc. specific to the issue of eating disorders. The presentation will begin at 7 p.m. in the MWHS Theater. A 30-minute question & answer session will follow. On Monday, November 25, a speaker from the SAVE Initiative will share insights on depression and brain illnesses. This presentation will last one hour and will begin at 7 p.m. in the MWHS Theater. A question and answer session will follow this presentation, as well. Both issues are important to families. Both issues are present, in some form, in every community. Each condition is preventable and/or treatable. Each comes with symptoms and warning signals; each involves strategies that can assist families in dealing with these complex conditions. Admission is free. Questions? Call Keith Randklev at 952.491.8101. Both events are sponsored by the MWHS Parent Advisory, Grandview Middle School PTO, and Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative. FOCUS TOPIC **Adult Basic Education: Helping People Become Self-Sufficient and Employable** Dr. Mary Hurley, Adult Basic Education (ABE) coordinator for the Westonka Public Schools, recently reported to the Westonka School Board regarding the accomplishments of the Adult Basic Education program. ABE offers five programs to eligible adults who are 16 or older, not enrolled in secondary school, and functioning below the 12th grade level in any of the basic academic areas including reading, math, writing and speaking English. -5198- 11/20/02 Page 3 of 5 1. General Educational Development (GED) diploma This national high school equivalency program includes a set of five tests covering math, reading, writing, social studies and science. 2. Adult Diploma Offers programs for adults leading to a high school diploma from a sponsoring Minnesota school district. 3. English as a Second Language For learners whose native language is not English. 4. Basic Skills Enhancement For learners who need goal-specific basic skills such as work-related math, functional literacy (e.g., banking skills), reading, or writing assistance. 5. Citizenship Education These programs prepare non-citizens for the US citizenship exam. Last year, nearly 100 adults were enrolled in the above five programs. 20 adults earned either a GED or adult diploma, 23 gained or improved their employment, and 20 gained skills so that they could help their children in school. Ten volunteers provided critical one-on-one support in ESL and/or basic literacy. UPCOMING EVENTS --November 11, First Day of Quarter Two --November 11, Joint Parent Advisory, 3:30 p.m, Shirley Hills Room 200 --November 11, GMS Food Drive and SH Rollerskating Unit Begin --November 12, GMS PTO, 7 pm. Focus topic: GMS Science Curriculum, presented by Annie Lund, Gr. 7 science and math teacher --November 12, Early Childhood Advisory Council, 6:30 pm, Early Childhood Center --November 13-14, Grade 5 Kindness Retreat --November 14, Hilltop PTA, 7 pm --November 14-17, MW Fall Musical, "Joseph and The Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat," 7:30 p.m. Tickets go on sale Monday, November 11, 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., in the Activities Department, Mound Westonka High School. Tickets are $9 adults; $7 students. Curtain rises at 7:30 p.m. on 11/14, 11/15, and 11/16; 2 p.m. on 11/17. --November 17-23, American Education Week (**note: this is a correction to the dates listed in the 2002-2003 Activities and Information Calendar) --November 18, MW Parent Advisory, MWHS, 4 p.m. --November 18, MW Choir Boosters, MWHS, 7 p.m. -5199- 11/20/02 Page 4 of 5 --November Center --November High School --November --November 18, School Board Study Session, 5 p.m., Shirley Hills Media 18, Eating Disorders Presentation, 7 p.m., Mound Westonka Theater 19, HT Concerts: Gr. 1, 6:30 p.m.; Gr. 3, 7:30 p.m. 19, SH PTA, 7 pm --November 19, Community Education Advisory Council, 7 p.m., Shirley Hills Room 200 --November 21, HT Family Fun Night, 4 p.m. Home Athletic Events (for more sports schedules, go to www.mshsl.org/mshsl/schoolpage.asp?school=314 --November 14, Girls Varsity Hockey vs. New Prague, Pond Arena, 7 p.m. --November 19, Girls Varsity Hockey vs. St. Louis Park, Pond Arena, 7 p.m. --November 23, Red and White Night Scrimmage, Boys and Girls Varsity Basketball vs. Glencoe-Silver Lake, MWHS Gym, 6 p.m. BONDS AND LEVIES Levies are for Leaming (paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries, utilities, and bus service) An operating levy was approved by voters in September 2002. Bonds are for Buildings (keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such as computers) A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001. HOW ARE WE DOING? We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. E-mail: welisten~westonka.k 12.mn.us District Feedback Line: 952.491.8260 Mail: Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonb~westonka.k 12.mn.us> It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong - 5200- 11/20/02 learning. Page 5 of 5 Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 weli sten~westonka, k 12. mn. us http ://www.westonka.k 12.mn.us Westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibil.ity for its accuracy. According to the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is public data. - 5201 - 11/20/02 Page 1 of 5 Kandis M Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us> Friday, November 22, 2002 11:57 AM VVeston ka. news Westonka.news Vol. 3, No. 9 November 22, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. Westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. **Due to holiday and production schedules, the next Westonka.news will be published on Friday, December 13. Contents 1. News Briefs --Red and White Night Rescheduled --MWHS Student Elected Area DECA Vice President --MWHS Teacher Leigh Kallestad Featured in National Professional Journal 2. Focus Topic: This is American Education Week 3. Upcoming Events 4. How Are We Doing? NEWS BRIEFS **Red and White Night Rescheduled** Due to a scheduling conflict with the opponent, the annual Red and White Night Basketball Scrimmage has been moved to tonight, Friday, November 22, at 6 p.m. Visiting team Glencoe/Silver Lake will compete in the football Prep Bowl this weekend, which required that the Red and White Night game be moved up a day. The game is an opportunity for spectators to enjoy fast-paced boys' and girls' basketball while providing an important source of financial - 5202- 11/22/02 Page 2 of 5 support for the varsity teams. **MWHS Student Elected Area DECA Vice President** Zach Wight, a junior at Mound Westonka High School, has been elected vice president of the District Three Action Team for DECA, a co-curricular organization for business and marketing students. Wight will provide leadership on a team representing 11 west metro high schools, including Wayzata, Edina, Eden Prairie, Orono, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, and others. According to MWHS marketing teacher and DECA advisor, Shalaine Seymour, it's the first time in more than five years that Mound Westonka High School has been represented at such a high leadership level. Congratulations, Zach! **MWHS Teacher Leigh Kallestad Featured in National Professional Journal** Leigh Kallestad, an instrumental music teacher at Grandview Middle School and Mound Westonka High School, is featured in the current issue of "School Band and Orchestra Magazine," a professional journal for music educators. The periodical focuses on the management aspects of running a successful music program, including topics such as recruitment and retention, budgeting, fund-raising, politics, travel and purchasing instrmnents, as well as producing educational and creative performances. Kallestad's article, "Incorporating Technology into Traditional Teaching," will have national exposure to a readership of 20,000 subscribers. The article walks the reader through Kallestad's work day, focusing on how he incorporates technology into activities ranging from monitoring student performance on specific music compositions, to organizing his time, coordinating grading with Grandview colleague Roger Whaley, and communicating with parents. You can find the full article at http://www, sbomagazine.com/sbomag/nov02/technology.html. Watch the Laker for a more detailed feature on this gifted teacher, one of Westonka's best! FOCUS TOPIC - 5203- 11/22/02 Page 3 of 5 **This is American Education Week** This is American Education Week, a recognition event started in 1921 with the following goals: to increase public understanding and appreciation of the nation's schools; to encourage parents and non-parents to visit schools; and to build civic and community pride and support for education. The celebration in the Westonka School District started with a School Board proclamation on November 4. Each school marks American Education Week with its own school-specific activities, and the Joint Parent Advisory (comprised of parent leaders from all four school buildings plus Early Childhood), sponsored placemats that were distributed to local restaurants, featuring a variety of good news items about the students and staff of the Westonka Schools. A few national and local statistics about public education: --A recent report by the National School Supply and Equipment organization shows that teachers are spending an average of $520 per year of their own money in the classroom. --A pre-Election Day national poll showed that 88% of Americans believe having good public schools in their local community is important. (Source: Education Week) --Minnesota public school teachers are the most qualified teachers in the country. They rank 1st out of 50 states, based on 12 indicators of teacher qualification. (Source: NCTAF, Doing What Matters Most: Investing in Teacher Qualification. November, 1997) Local statistic: 64% of Westonka licensed teachers have earned at least a master's degree. --Minnesota has some of the safest schools in the country. Minnesota is one of the top 4 states in the country in the percentage of public school 4th graders and 8th graders who report feeling safe in their school. (Source: Education Week, Quality Counts 2002) In a recent survey of Grandview Middle School parents, 88% said their child feels safe at Grandview. UPCOMING EVENTS --November 25, Hilltop Toy/Hat/Mitten Drive Begins --November 25, Gr. 5 choir concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School --November 28-29, No School (Thanksgiving Holiday); district offices closed --December 2, Kindergarten Information Night, 7 p.m., Shirley Hills Primary School --December 3, Kindergarten Information Night, 7 p.m., Hilltop Primary School --December 3, SH Gr. 3 to Orchestra Hall --December 3, Gr. 6 Band Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School --December 4, SH Gr. 4 to Orchestra Hall and Art Institute --December 5, HT Gr. 4 to Orchestra Hall - 5204- 11/22/02 Page 4 of 5 --December 5, Special Education Advisory Council, 6:30 p.m., Hilltop Media Center --December 5, MW Choir Concert, 7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High School --December 9, Gr. 6 Choir Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School --December 9, School Board meeting, 7:30 p.m. "Share the Success" portion of the meeting starts at 7 p.m. Shirley Hills Primary School media center --December 10, SH PTA, 3:30 p.m. --December School --December School --December --December --December 10, SH Gr. 2 Music Concert, 6:30 p.m., Shirley Hills Primary 10, SH Gr. 3 Music Concert, 7:30 p.m., Shirley Hills Primary 10, Gr. 7 Band Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School 12, MW Band Concert, 7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High School 13, HT Gr. 3 to Lowry Nature Center Home Athletic Events (for more sports schedules, go to www.mshsl.org/mshsl/schoolpage.asp?school=314 --November 22, Red and White Night Scrimmage, Boys and Girls Varsity Basketball vs. Glencoe-Silver Lake, MWHS Gym, 6 p.m. BONDS AND LEVIES Levies are for Learning (paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries, utilities, and bus service) An operating levy was approved by voters in September 2002. Bonds are for Buildings (keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such as computers) A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001. HOW ARE WE DOING? We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. E-mail: welisten@westonka.k 12.mn.us District Feedback Line: 952.491.8260 Mail: Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonb~westonka.kl 2.mn.us> - 5205- 11/22/02 Page 5 of 5 It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 welisten~westonka.k 12.mn.us http://www.westonka.k 12.mn.us Westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is public data. - 5206- 11/22/02 -5207-. 5208- 52O9 A publication of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office II Deputy Waldon Receives Medal of Deputy Rick Waldon was honored at the'recent Fall Recognition Ceremonies with the HCSO Medal of ValOr for his rolein saving the life of a Rogers city . employee. Deput~,. Waldon's efforts saved the life.of a man trapped in a storm drain. Chrisy Hughes' bravery in attempting to save the life of another was. detai led when Chrisy received the Citizen Medal of Valor from Sheri'ff Pat McGowan. Chrisy made a valiant effort to save the life of another last summer. Deputy Robert Kohls was .recognized with the Career Achievement Award for 28 years of commitment and excellent service to HCSO~ Deputy Kohls' service as a K~9 handler and trainer and his Work in mentoring others were cited as outstanding achievements. Captain Bill Chandler received the Award o~: Merit for his role in pulling a Minneapolis Fi're Captain and the man he was trying to-save from the Mississippi River last summer. Deputy Brett Bukkila received a Commendation Award for saving the life of a heart attack victim under very diffucult circumstances. Deputy Joe Mundt also received a Commendation Award for his role in saving an inmate in the PSF during a suicide attemPt. Deputy Mundt was also being sworn in at the cer- emony. His lifesaving actions were conducted as a new deputy on h is fi rst assign ment- to the Ad u It Deten- tion Division. In additionto the awards, eight.were promoted to higher rank~ They included: Detention Deputy Tim Bush to Detention Sgt., Detention Dep.uty Heather C-lement to Detention Sgt., FALL 2002 Sheriff Patrick D. McGowan I I I I Valor, Civilian Medal. Also Awarded Sheriff Pat McGowan congratulates Chrisy Hughes for her effort to save a drowning victim in'LakeMinnetonka last summer. Chrisy received the Sheriff's Office Citizen Medal Of Valor for her repeated dives into cold water to rescue an elderly man. Detention Lt. Michael Wresh to Det. Captain, Deputy Ralph Clark to Detective, Deputy Dan Antisdel to Sgt., Warrant Unit, Lt. Pat Moeto Captain, Investigative Division. Eleven new deputy sheriffs were also Detention Deputy Steve Sutton to Detention Sgt., Detention Sgt. Randy Carroll to Der. Lt., s Page 2 Sheriff's Report A Time To Remember The Sheriff'S Office Honor Guard lowered the flag on the Government Center Plaza to half mast on September 11 at exactly 7:46 a.m. during ceremo- nies to honor public safety responders and remember the victims of the Septem- ber 11 attacks. The Honor Guard later ap- peared at ceremonies, preceding the Twins game at the Metrodome. Jail Earns National Accreditation and Perfect Score from DOC Geno Natalucci-Persichetti, Chairperson of the Commis- ' in on.Accreditation for Corrections, has announced that Hennepin CountySheriff'sOffice (HCSO) Adult Deten- Center has been fully accredited after a thorough re- view and evaluation process. Only 4% of the jails in the nation achieve accreditation from the American Correctional Association. The award was announced August 5 in con- junction with the American Correctional Association 132nd Congress of Corrections in Anaheim, California. Natalucci-Persichetti complimented Sheriff Pat McGowan and the HCSO detention staff for the professional level of operation and their success in completing the accreditation process. HCSO is one of over 1,500 correctional orgam- zations currently involved in the accreditation process across the nation Inspector Tom Merkel who heads the jaii operations of the SherifFs Office also commended the detention team fOr their achievement and said that the ACA accreditation affirms the Sheriff's jail 'operations as "one of the finest in the nation." The jail received per- fect scores on rankings in all mandatory cat- egories. The award came just one year after the opening of the new Public Safety Facility in downtown.Minneapolis. Sheriff McGowan that the hard work and commitment of ;taft made this award possible "In ad- dition to the demands of operating a new facility, our detention staff also devoted a tremendous amount of time and effort to the accreditation process," he said. "1 am very proud of every one of them and believe they have earned this na- tional recognition." The Hennepin County Adult Detention Center also earned a perfect score on its annual inspection by the Minnesota De- partment of Corrections. The August 15 inspection found that the jail was n 100% compliance on all applicable mandatory rules and applicable essential rules. The jail now qualifies for biennial inspections instead of annual reviews. Diane Grinde, Detention Facility Inspector for the DOC, wrote that "the facility was clean and the staff appear to respond appropriately to inmates' requests." She als0 noted that the new kitchen with its freezing and reheating process is work- ing well. is a publication of Ihe Hennepin Coonl~ Sheriff's Public Information Office Room 6. Courthouse 350 South Fifth ~tree! Minneapolis, MN 55415 Public Information Officer - Roseann Campa§noli (612) 348~7159 rosea,t n. ca mpag,toli~co, henn epilt, m,t. ~s -5212- Sheriff's Report Found · in t Recently, the mailbox has been very full. Here are just 'a few letters received: "l. want to express my heartfelt thanks for the efforts of your operation. Your personnel were professional, very consider- ate and kind in .discussions and explanations of the opera- tions surrounding my husband, John Huff's.drowning on Lake Minnetonka on Friday, May 24. They are to be highly commended." Louise H. Huff "On June 26, a friend was unexpectedly detained on an out- standing traffic warrant. I had just flown into Minnesota from California. Your staff was .very nice and understanding of my situation. I had to wait at the downtown station for almost six hours, but your staff made the time pass quickly. I wanted to let you know that Latoya, Lori, Deputies Lang, Heck and Miller were very respectful and should be commended for their kind- ness." Natasha Frost Los Angeles "On July 26-28, many of you volunteered your services to help us locate Caren Soens in the Chanhassen area. Caren and her family and friends send you our heartfelt gratitude for your efforts. So many of you took time away from your families to help our family. The amount of support we received was overwhelming. The work you do is hard, but so important! 'Thank you again." Sue Olson Chandler Honored By MEMA, MADD It was a well deserved banner month for Captain Bill Chan- :ller who, in addition, to receiving the HCSO Award of Merit, was also recognized at the 42nd Annual Association of Min- nesota Emergency Managers' Fall Conference. Chandler re- ceived the "Outstanding Non-Director" Award for his efforts ~n providing training in MIMS, Mass Fatalities and Civil Un- rest for the State Department of Emergency Manageme mt. Captain Cha'ndler was also recently recognized by the ,Hennepin County Chapter of MADD for his "outstanding ef- forts tO keep our roadways safe from 'lm paired drivers." MADD · ~President Kris Rice thanked Chandler for his efforts ancl .noted ~:. the pride, her organization feels to have'him as part of the i'~?Hennepin County team. ' ' he 5her'iff's AA ilb 9... "This~letter is written in appreciation for the presence of your Honor Guard Unit at the funeral of our fallen deputy. Deputy Brad Anderson's death deeply saddened and impactc the members of the St. Louis County Sheriff's Office. The presence of your Honor Guard Unit at Deputy And~ rson's funeral assisted in making the experience one of honor, order. and. respect. Please extend my appreciation directly to the members who were in attendance." Richard Wahlberg St. Louis Co. Sheriff 'Editors Note: The Major County SheriffS' Association met in Minneapofis during the recent IA CP Conference. The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office supporfed both events. The HCSO staff, as- signed to the MCSA was coordinated by Sgt. David Ringberg. "1 want to express m-y thanks for all the assistance that we received during the recent International Chiefs of Police (IACP) Conference in Minneapolis. Ginevra and I felt a warm Min- neapolis we/come from the moment we arrived. Sgt. Dave Ringberg and his staff made us feel comfortable and assisted us in getting around the city. The Hennepin County deputies Who assisted us were outstanding representatives law enforcement and the Hennepin County Sheriff's Off as well as ambassadors for the city. We are very appreciative of their many efforts on our behalf. I would also like to express my appreciation for Sgt. Ringberg's efforts to assist the Major County Sheriffs'Association in mak- ing the arrangements for our meeting. The room, breakfast and accommodations were all first rate." Joseph R. Wolfinger Executive Director MCSA "Thank you for dedicating three of your deputies to our en- forcement saturation, July 19. Deputies Dave McNellis, Dale Schoenbauer and Darren )ohnson did an excellent job of working together with Edina officers to make our highways safer for motoristS. It is always, a pleasure to work with you and your deputies in coordination of enforcement projects like this.' Edina PD gets several call& letters and e-mails every day from people asking us to increase enforcement on our high- ways. A cooperative venture like this is a highly visible mes- sage that we are out there trying to make ou~ roadways safer for everyone traveling in Hennepin County." Sgt. Phil Larsen Edina Police Dei. Page 4 II II II II II I I I Sheriff's Report I~9gB~ NI/~ 'punoiN p~aobl pOON~e~ ~,uemu~adeQ eo!lOd punolN IleJJ~H pJeuoe-I ~te[qo g/.~g 'ON .Ll~lBd NIAI "S-IdlAI C]lYd ]E)VISOd 'S'fl aJ.s aJ. Sd -5214- CITY OF MOUND Meeting Minutes Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting held on 10/28/02 Date printed 11/04/02 The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, October 28, 2002 at Mound Fire Station: Present: Todd Christopherson Amcon TC John McKinley City Kandis Hanson City KH Greg Pederson City JM GP Talked about phones, cable TV, security, computer networking. The phone system should include an intercom component. Would also like to interface the 800 MHz system with the phone system. TC has suggested that we make sure we have adequate quantities for box/conduits for these items and show on electrical plans. After bids done and contracts awarded, we can refine Iow voltage needs and make adjustments to the locations as necessary. Some of the phone vendors that have called are on the State contract system and therefore no bidding would be necessary. Also, the individual systems - phones, security, and computer network - would be under $50,000. Next week's meeting will include a discussion about re-establishing a meeting schedule now that the design is done. We will try to keep a standing meeting on a weekly basis so that we can resolve some of the FFE issues and coordination. TC will miss this meeting (11/4), however, he will e-mail a memo related to this for consideration. The lease will be discussed at tonight's Council meeting. Next week meeting at 4 PM will be to discuss schedule for future meetings. TC suggested that coming meetings be focused on issues not yet finalized such as FFE, phones, security, etc. This series of meetings will probably not involve the entire building and design committees and meetings will likely be shorter. TC will not be at meeting on 11/4. 8. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5\5J2LV56G~VlPS 10 28 02.doc -5215- Page 1 of 1 -5216- -5217- -5218- St. Anthony Adopts Effective Key Financial Strategies Anyone reading the news in the metro area is probably aware of the major redevelopment project underway in St. Anthony - the Apache Plaza Mall. But what you might not be aware of is that this year St. Anthony has tackled a series of major initiatives that look to the future of the community. These include a planning process to develop options for Public Works and Fire Station facilities and serious strategic and financial planning efforts. "This is an exciting time in St. Anthony," said Mayor Randy Hodson, the elected head of this community of 8500 located 10 minutes northeast of downtown Minneapolis. "Our Council under- stands the need to be progressive, to plan for the future, and to use the resources we have wisely to keep our community moving forward." In light of that vision, the St. Anthony City Council took an important step in September, adopting Key Financial Strategies. Key Financial Strategies are a unique financial framework designed to guide the financial policies and practices of a city and assure its ability to meet future operating and capital needs. "We felt it was important to focus on two general areas," Hodson said. "The first was developing and refining information regarding the capital and operating costs facing us in future years. The second was identifying alternatives to the current type and level of services we offer and funding options for those services." The strategies were developed through a series of four workshops With the City Council and facilitated by Ehlers & Associates. The four workshops focused on: · Analyzing current financial conditions includ- ing analysis of comparable communities. · Projecting and prioritizing future operating and capital needs. · Assessing options to close the "gap" between needs and resources including a budget "option analysis" for alternatives to the current level and variety of services. · Preparing a final plan including implementation timetable. While the strategies were designed to be implemented in measured steps over the next five years, Hodson pointed out that 15 out of the 22 major recommendations are already underway. Chief among these are preparation of a non-annual recurring maintenance schedule, the Apache Mall redevel- opment, and' facility planning for the Public Works and the Fire Department. "In St. Anthony we realized that you can't afford to rely upon the annual budget and capital improvement plan as the sole means of financial management," Hodson said. "We have to antici- pate what our needs will be in five to ten years and develop strategies and options to meet those needs." Another important benefit to this type of plan- ning is the ability' "to communicate opportunities to the public and seek their guidance as we plan for the future," Hodson said. Hodson gave credit to the City Council members and staff for their hard work and thoughtfulness in developing a realistic, practical blueprint for St. Anthony's future. "We were elected to make sure St. Anthony is a good place for people to live, work and learn now and in the future, and that is what we are doing," Hodson said. -5219- Ehlers ^dvJsor, Fall 2002 Moody's Upgrades Credit Ratings of Many Minnesota School Districts There have been a 10t of fiscal dark clouds for school districts lately, but finally here's some good news - Moody's Investors Service has upgraded many Minnesota school districts' credit ratings, In a recently released report, Moody's cited two primary positive factors for the credit ratings change: · Strong State oversight programs that bolster local management and financial accountability, and · Favorable population and enroll- ment trends in many districts. In preparation for the report, Moody's analysts reviewed the credit of all 109 Minnesota school districts for which they had a current rating. Of these 109 districts, Moody's upgraded the ratings of 36 districts and downgraded none. The box on this page lists the 36 districts with upgraded ratings. The news is especially welcome for Minnesota school districts that have been facing budget cuts and seeking voter support for additional funding. With an expected large State budget shortfall in the coming biennium, many expect that school districts and other local governments are headed for several years of additional fiscal stress. ,While Moody's expects short-term financial pressures, we believe there are sector-wide credit strengths to mitigate the potential pressures," said Jonathan North, Assistant Vice Presi- dent at Moody's. "Despite the up- grades, the median rating on Minne- sota school districts remains Baal, compared to A2 nationally." In a sense, credit ratings of individual Minnesota school districts have become less important in the past ten according to Joel Sutter of Ehlers. In the early '90s, the State plemented a program (the Minne- sota School District Credit Enhance- ment Program, or MSDCEP) in which it pledged that, if necessary, it will make bond payments on behalf of school districts. Because of this pledge, all Minnesota school district bonds that are part of this program are guaran- teed relatively high ratings (currently Aa1 from Moody's Investors Service and AA+ from Standard and Poor's). The rating agencies also, however, maintain "underlying" ratings on many school districts; the underlying ratings apply to bonds that were issued prior to the inception of the MSDCEE requires districts to file reports regarding the impact of new labor agreements on their budgets. The "statutory operating debt (SOD)" statute, enacted in the mid- 1970s. This statute establishes criteria for identifying districts in SOD, requires that they prepare plans for elimination of the debt, and subjects them to closer State scrutiny and oversight until the debt is eliminated. These underlying ratings are important for two reasons. First, they are a general indication of the underlying fiscal health of the district. Second, a strong underly- ing rating may have a limited positive effect on the market- ability of a Annandale district's bonds. The Moody's "Special Com- ment'' report, released in August, makes note of the State's ongoing budget short- fails, as well as recent shifts in timing of school district receipts that have worsened districts' cash A2 Anoka-Hennepin A1 Chaska A3 Detroit Lakes A3 Duluth A3 Eden Prairie Aa3 Edina Aa1 Faribault Baal Hastings Baal Herrnantown A3 Hibbing Baal Hopkins A1 Hutchinson A3 Kasson-Mantorville Menahga The Moody's report also cites popula- tion growth and slight enrollment growth - especially in the Twin Cities area - as positive factors for many school districts. North St. Norw( Osakis ~¢~t~ "~ Baa2 Osseo ~;i[:.~}~il}'?*~i Aaa Parkers PFa ~ie~;, ',~ ~ ~;:,:~ ~,, Baa2 A2 Rocorl¢: :¢. , ,¢ ;:, ~ A3 flow problems. However, the report's authors cite the State's "strong oversight and enforcement mechanisms" as a positive factor Montgomery-Lonsdale Moose Lake North Branch that' will help to stabilize credit quality. They specifi- cally mention the following two state programs. · The "structural balance" statute, enacted in 2001. This statute For a complete copy of the Moody's report, send a request by e-mail to Jonathan North at northj@moodys.com, and ask for a copy of the Special Comment on Minnesota School Districts. -5220- Ehiers Advisor ,, Fall 2002 Osseo Redefines its Community Gateway Osseo is an attractive, historic community northwest of Minneapolis. However, the City faced a frustrating problem - its gateway on County Road 81 was marred by an auto salvage yard. "There are 25,000 cars a day that go by there on County Road 81," said Mayor Dan Sadler. The decision to make a change at the intersection and develop an attractive gateway was coupled with the recognition that fully developed communities like Osseo need to redevelop, he said. "We're landlocked and the only way to grow is from within, eliminate blight, and grow the taxbase," Sadler said. "We have no undeveloped land. It is very important for us to make use of existing land and parcels." City Administrator Dave Callister applied for and the City received grants to help pay to acquire and dean up the site. The next challenge was to find the right type of development to not only serve as a new community, gateway but also to bolster the city's limited commercial tax base. Osseo retained Ehlers & Associates to provide Redevelop- ment Management services. Ehlers advisors, partnered with City staff to move the project from an idea to project construction in just nine months. Ehlers services included: · .Preparation of a development concept consistent with city economic and planning goals. · Identification of qualified developers. · Preparation of a request for development proposals. · Review of development proposals. · Developer selection. (OSSEO continued on page 4) 2003 1.68% 1.48% 2007 2.76% 2.54% 2012 3.71% 3.48% 2017 4.38% 4.15% 2022 4.79% 4.63% Bond Buyer Index 1990 to Present October 18, 2002 -5221- 90 91 92 93 94 95 98 97 98 99 O0 01 02 SOURCE The BondBuyer, Cleft prepared by Ehlere & Associates, thC. %:!!'/~"-:',:!i!!.' ;!::.!! i:~ 7: ?,.':~'.;-~:~ ;:':~:?i':?.?'"'~:'i:,::::5:~ ::~'~ ~.:~'. Ehlers Advisor · Fall 2002 Legislature Gives New Street Bonding Authority to Local-Governments IT he 2002 Minnesota Legislature authorized local governments to issue bonds without a referendum under street reconstruction programs, a change welcomed by city officials. "This is a good change for cities because it will free up cities in terms of financing options for street recon- struction,'' said Todd Hagen, Financial Advisor, Ehlers & Associates. Granting municipalities the authority to issue bonds for street reconstruction without regard to election require- ments enables cities to finance street reconstruction without having to specially assess at least 20 percent of the project costs. Conditions on the authority include: · approval of the issuance by unanimous council vote; · that the project is part of the reconstruction plan; · that public notice is provided; · it is subject to reverse referendum provisions; and, · it is subject to the municipalities net debt limit, even if they would be exempt under another law. The law authorizes issuance of obliga- tions without an election for recon- struction of streets, if the bonds are issued under a five-year street recon- struction plan. For more information on this new law and how it will impact your commu- nity, contact Todd Hagen, 651-697- 8608, or Rebecca Kurtz, 651-697-8516. Ehlers & Associates Acquires Juran & Moody Name Ehlers & Associates has acquired the name of Juran & Moody, a division of Miller Johnson Steichen Kinnard Investment Securities, Inc. (MJSK), located in Minneapolis. The acquisition follows the departure of key staff people involved in servicing MJSK's municipal clients. Those departures impacted the ability of MJSK to provide financial advisory services to its municipal clients. MJSK will con- tinue to provide its investment services to Juran & Moody clients as well as other Minnesota municipalities. Ehlers will provide these municipalities with financial advisory services. '"This is an opportunity for Ehlers to offer Juran and Moody clients a wider range of independent financial advisory services including our debt management, financial planning, and economic development products, in addition to our debt issuance ser- vices,'' said Steve Apfelbacher, President of Ehlers. "Ehlers has the experience and resources to offer practical and creative solutions to help municipalities build better communities." Osseo Property Valued at $500,000 Now Worth $10 Million (OSSEO continued from page 3) · Preparation of tax increment plan. · Developer negotiations. The project was completed in 2001. Now instead of an auto salvage yard, the site consists of a three-story office building with underground parking and an office-warehouse facility. difference is phenomenal. The has reacted very positively. We took a piece of property that was valued at about $500,000 and today it's worth $10 million," Sadler said. The success has also encouraged a number of other redevelopment projects within the community, Sadler said. "Ehlers has helped us make redevelop- ment a reality for our community. Their hands-on approach and exten- sive development experience was a perfect complement to our staff," Sadler said. Ehlers is currently providing redevel- opment services for nine projects in seven cities with a total estimated value in excess of $500 million. -5222- 05/ rice: CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, November 13, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · 11/28/02 Regular Board Meeting has been cancelled due to the Thanksgiving Holiday · Consolidation of 12/11/02 and 12/25/02 Regular Board Meetings to 12/18/02 READING OF MINUTES- 10/9/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC coMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. 1. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A) B) C) Review of draft "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minneton. ka Report and Recommendations: 2002 Pilot Inspection Program"; Update of 10/23/02 EWM Harvesting Program Working Group Meeting; Additional BUsiness`, ADMINISTRATION A) Appointments for 2003: · Auditor Selection Legal Counsel · Prosecuting Attorney · Bookkeeper · Official Newspaper · Bank Depository Resolution for fiscal year 2003 B) Discussion of proposal to change health insurance for LMCD employees to Health Partners (handout): C) Additional Business; FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (10/16/02 - 10/31/02) and (11/1/02 - 11/15/02); -5223- B) (*) September finanCial summary and balance sheet; C} Additional Business; 4. LAKE USE & RECREATION A) Report from the Chair of 10/31/02 Annual Meeting with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol; B) (*) Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Significant Activity Report; C} Additional Business; 5. SAVE THE LAKE A) (*) Minutes from the 10/30/02 "Save the Lake" Advisory Committee Meeting. (handout); B) Report from the 10/30/02 "Save the Lake" Advisory Committee Meeting; C) Additional Business; 6. WATER STRUCTURES 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION. Performance Evaluation of Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to conduct evaluation in closed session) 11. ADJOURNMENT -5224- DR AFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD'OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, October 9, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMillan, Orono; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; DoUg Babcock, Tonka Bay; On/Burma, Mound; Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Tom' Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Katy Van Hercke, Uinnetonka Beach; Sheldon Weft, Greenwood. Aisc present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD COunsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Victoria has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster Foster made two Chair announcements: · The Annual Meeting with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol is scheduled for Thursday, t0/31/02, at 7:30 A.M: at the Water Patrol Headquarters in Spring Park. He encouraged interested Board members to attend this meeting. · He would be unable to attend the 10/23/02 Regular BOard Meeting and he suggested that the Board might want to consider moving it to 10/30/02. He asked for feedback from the Board On this. Nybeck suggested that discussion on whether to move to the 10/23/02 Regular Board Meeting to 10/30/02 should be held until after agenda item lA. If the Board at this meeting resolves agenda item lA, the Board might want to cancel the 10/23/02 Board Meeting rather than re-scheduling it. READING OF MINUTES. 8/28/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 9/25/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting Report MOTION: Babcock moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the minutes from the 8/28/02 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (9), Abstained (1, Van Hercke); motion carded. Nybeck stated that staff prepared a Report for the 9/25/02 Regular Board Meeting that did not have a quorum. This Report was for informational purposes and did not require approval by the Board. Ambrose arrived at 7:06 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda Mr. John Evans, 2025 Arbor Lane, commented on enforcement by the Sheriffs Water Patrol during the recent "High- Water Declaration", especially in Harrisons Bay. He complimented the enforcement efforts of the Sheriffs Water -5225- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October 9, 2002 Page2 Patrol; however, he recommended that there is a need for more enforcement presence in future "High-Water Declarations", Foster stated that he had talked to Lt. Johnson from the SherifFs Water Patrol and he informed him that there was a drowning on another lake in Hennepin County dudng the "High-Water Declaration" that diverted a rnajodty of patrol coverage on Lake Minnetonka to recover the body. The two additional LMCD Deputies remained on Lake Minnetonka and provided the majority of coverage until the body was recovered, noting that there probably would not have been coverage without the two LMCD Deputies. Babcock stated that if the public in Mound believes that added Water Patrol presence is need, he recommended 'they should contact the City of Mound encouraging them to financially participate in the existing program. CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Nelson moved, Wert seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Items so approved include: 2A, Minutes from the 9/13/02 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting, and 3B, August financial summary and balance sheet. Gilman arrived at 7:12 p.m. WATER STRUCTURES A. Consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the following variances: · Fredrick & Michelle Pacovsky, adjusted dock use area and dock length. · Shirley Hendrickson & Rick Windenburg, adjusted dock use area; dock length, and side setback. · Mark Finney, dOck length. Foster asked staff for background on the draft Findings. Nybeck made the following comments: · At the 9/2/5/02 Regular Meeting, staff proposed dock use areas for the three sites that have submitted an application for vadance from Code. The consensus.Of the Board and the applicantS at that meeting was to proceed with the dock use areas because they believed that they were reasonable. The Board directed the applicants to transfer the proposed dock use areas on the survey and LeFevere was directed to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the variance applications for consideration at this meeting. · The Draft Findings of Fact and Order include four properties that are subject to this document. They include: 1) the Finney property- 3210 North Shore Ddve, 2) the HendriCksOn/VVindenburg property,, 3200 North Shore Ddve, 3) the Pacovsky- 3186 North Shore Drive, and 4) the Blomberg property- 3180 North Shore Ddve. · At the Finney site, there is only a need for a dock length variance. The dock Use area length would be 100' from the 929.4' shoreline and would require a minimum of a 15' side setback from both extended side site lines. No side-opening slips towards the east would be permitted. No language was added to the Findings that would allow a canopy with less than the 20' side setback required by Code; however, this possibly could be done through mutual consent. Babcock stated that he believed the Code would not allow the owner of a commercial structure to enter into a mutual consent for amendment to required side setbacks for the canopy with the abutting resident, -5226- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October 9, 2002 Page 3 Foster stated that he believed the intent of the 20' side setback for canopies was to allow better views for abuffing property owners that might be obstructed from a less restrictive side setback requirement. Because the Finney property abuts North Shore Madna that is a commercial property, he stated thai he would not be troubled with a smaller side setback for the property to shield them from the commercial activity. Babcock stated that a dock with a canopy is not prohibited at this site. The problem at this site is that the applicant is proposing to put both a canopy and a wide dock within the authorized dock area. There was no adjustment of the side site line extensions at the Finney site and he expressed concem about granting a variance that would allow them to store more watercraft than they would be allowed if a dock length variance was not granted. Nybeck continued his comments: · At the HenddcksonANindenburg site, the Findings include variance from Code for dock length, side setbacks, and an adjusted dock use area. A dock use area length variance Would be granted to a length of 100' from the 929.4' shoreline. The northerly extension of the' eastern extended side site line would be deflected 13 degrees 31 minutes to the west from the point at which it crosses the 929.4' shoreline. The side lines of the dock use area would be the area lying between the following two lines: a line five feet west of a parallel to the adjusted east lot line and a line 39' west of an parallel to the adjusted east lot line. The dock use area shall not include the area lYing west of the extended west lot line of this site. No side opening slips would be permitted opening either toward the west or toward the east. · At the Pacovsky site, the Findings include a vadanoe from Code for length and an, adjusted dock use area. The dock use area length variance would be grantedto a length of 90' from the 929.4' shoreline. The northerly extension of the western,extended side site line would be adjusted as described in the HendricksonANindenburg site, The northerly extension of the eastern.extended side site line would be deflected 15 degrees 13 minutes .to the east from the point at which it crosses the 929.4' shoreline. The dock use area shall maintain a five foot setback from both of the deflected east and west lot line extensions. OnlY.one straight;dock.may be constructed in the dock use area and such dock Shall be constructed adjacent to the .west edge of the dock.use area. Only one watercraft could be stored at this dock and it may not have a beam exceeding 8 % feet and must be stored on the east side of the dock. Some Board members have expressed interest in also restricting the length of.the watercraft. Babc. ock siated, that.he would support restdct ng th~. length of the watercraft at the Pacovsky site to 24' length' oVera; With its equ'Pment in normal operating position, ~ Nybeck stated that the Board might want to expand the order to include the Wallace property at 3160 North Shore Ddve. In thedraft Findings for the Blomberg site, a deck use area length variancewoUld be granted to a length:of 1~0i from t~e 92gi:.4.,.~h°reiine, ~iomb~rg h~s requested a dOck length vadance athis property and the adjacent property to the east, of' t30' from the 929.4' shoreline. Blomberg proposed a five foot side setback.for the entire 130' Iongdock. use.ama on the west side and a 10' Side setback on the east side. In the draft Findings, LeFevere has proposed Setbacks from extended line of five feet for the first 50' from the 929.4' shoreline and 10' setbacks for the area between 50., and 100' from the 929.4' shoreline. The granting of a length vadance to 130' at both sites Would generally allow the common dock they share to be continued. Babcock stated that extending the dock use area to 130' from the 929.4' shoreline at the Blomberg site might make sense because of the water depth, pmb ems in the area, especially if its four feet at the end of the dock. -5227- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October 9, 2002 Page4 Although water depths may be a problem at the Wallace site, he stated that he would be reluctant to include this site in the Findings because the water depths have not been documented and a Public hearing has not been conducted. LeFevere stated that it would difficult to include the Wallace property in the Findings because the Pacovsky adjustment did not adjust the Wallace side site line extensions and the neighbors in the immediate area were not notified through a public hearing notice that vadance from Code was being considered at the Wallace site. Babcock stated that the Wallace property could always make an application for variance from Code in the future. Foster stated that he believed the Board could support a 130' long dock use variance at the Blomberg site, noting that Mr. Wallace could make an application for variance from Code for dock length. The Board might want to consider waiving fees for the Wallace variance application; however, he believed that the Board should focus on the four sites that are included in the Findings. Babcock stated that he concurred with Foster; hoWever, he was concerned about waiving fees for a hypothetical variance application for Wallace, LeFevere stated that the Board might want to consider the folloWing changes in the draft Findings: · In A2) in the Order, Babcock has recommended changing the word "boat" to "watercraft". Babcock has also added language at all four sites in the Order that would require "all docks and watercraft to be contained in the defined dock use areas". · In C4) in the Order, Babcock has recommended limiting the watercraft length at the Pacovsky site to 24' length overall, with equipment at its normal operating position · At the Blomberg Site in the Order, it might make senSe to adjust the dock use area length from 100' as detailed in the draft Findings to 130' as recommended by staff. He recommended that it might make sense to maintain the side setbacks at the Blomberg site from both Side site lines as outlined in the draft Findings. McMillan stated that it might be beneficial for future residents and Board members to add language to the Findings that state what variance are approved at each property. At the Wallace site, they should make applications for a separate dock length variance, if they would like to extend their dock 130' from the 929,4' shoreline because they are not directly related to the variance applk~ations included in the draft Findings like the Blomberg property is. Mr. Rich Anderson, Owner of North ShOre Marina, stated that he believed the 24' length restriction for the watercraft at the Pacovsky site might be too reStrictive.baSed on the current market. Seuntjens stated that he might be sUpportive of a 26' length restriction at the Pacovsky site rather than 24'. Babcock stated that other applicants have been restricted to a 24' length restriction bY the Board because that was believed to be a reasonable boat size on Lake Minnetonka. He recommended a 24' length restriction for consistency purposes. MOTION: Gilman moved, Babcock seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for the Pacovsky, -5228- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting OCtober 9, 2002 Page5 Hendrickson/Windenburg, and Finney variance applications, subject to amending it to include the language as outlined by LeFevere. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Foster directed staff to notify the owners of the Wallace property that they were not included in the approved variance~ granted in the approved Findings of Fact. and Order. He encouraged them to submit an application for variance from Code if they want to continue the shared dock with the Blomberg's or if they want to install their own dock out beyond 100' from the 929.4' shoreline. B. Additional Business.' There was no additional business. 2. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE B. Review of 2002 EWM Final Season Report. Foster asked Harper for an overview of the Report. Harper · made the following comments: The 2002 season was a relative success, despite.the high lake level conditions on Lake Minnetonka. There were 18 days that were at or above the 930.0' lake elevation, compared to. seven in 2001. This was problematic for the program because the plant was not matting in areas of the lake that it normally does, making it more difficult for the harvester operators. · The total amount of acres harvested in 2002 was 711.25, compared to 619,75 acres in 2001. With the change in superviS on i.n 20021 this may be somewhat skewed. A Global Positioning System (GPS) was purchased at the end of the 2002 season and will be utilized in 2003~ with the goal of determining a more accurate figure for acres harvested. · The total number of harvester oads n 2002 was 273.75, compared to 225 in 2001. The total number of truck loads in 2002 was 1~, compared to.~122 in 2001. He. pointed Out that the cubic yard capacity of the truCk increased from 20 in 2001 to 25 in 2002. · There are,three pdmary reasons for a productive harvesting season in 2002 despite the lake levels, These included: i) the change in:the site supervisor to JohnEvans, 2) the majodty of the harvesting crew returned' from 2001, and 3) the maintenance of the harvesting equipment by Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. · Harvester load statistics in 2002 ona harvester basis, were.as follows: #1, 45,75; #2- 51.50, ~- 18.00, ~- 66.75, and #5- 90.75. The storage capacity of#5 was quite a bit more than the other four harvesters He pointed out that #5 was the harvester purchased prior to the 2002 season, with the remaining harvesters purchased in 1989. He reminded the Board that there has been discussion of purchasing a new harvester for the 2003 season and trading in up to two of the harvesters purchased in 1989. · Expenses in 2002 were generally within the budget, noting that the grant received for the program in 2002 was reduced by approximately $3,500 from 2001. · He stated that John Evans was in attendance to make any additional comments orto address questions or comments from the Board. -5229- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October g, 2002 Page6 NybeCk stated that there was an expenditure of approximately $5,500 to upgrade the trailer that is used to transport the harvesters from the lot to Spring Park Bay. It currently is in the EWM Budget and it might need to be transferred to the EWM Capital Reserve Fund if expenditures become a concern. Van Hercke asked if residents on Lake Minnetonka could request funds for a certain area, citing the area 'on the west Side of Grays Bay along the 101 causeway as an example. She stated that milfoil is overtaking this area of Grays Bay and it i~ not aesthetically pleasing and it has minimized the recreatiOnal area on the bay. The Board directed Van Hercke to work further with staff on making the appropriate contacts with the MN DNR to address her concerns about Grays Bay. Foster thanked staff and John Evans, on behalf of the Board, for another successful harvesting season in 2002. C. Analysis of 2002 EWM Trucking Payments. Foster stated that at the 9/25/02 Board Meeting, Steve Curfman made a plea for 12.5 hours of nonpayment for lunch periods during the season, or $625.00. He believed that the amount of money requested was relatively small and that there was discussion to pay for half of this amount, or $312.50. He complimented the efforts made by staff before the season to cladfy whether the trucking company awarded the contract woUld be compensated for the 30 minute lUnch period. However, he stated that he would support a payment of $312.50 to resolve the issue raised by Steve Curfman becaUse he believed that was the consensus of Board members Present at the 9/25/02 BOard Meeting. Nybeck reviewed a letter, dated 4/15/02, that was sent out to Curfman that cladfied that the company awarded the 2002 EWM TruCking Contract would not be compensated for the 30 minute lunch period and that this should be factored into the hourly base rate if it was a problem. MOTION: Skramstad moved, McMillan seconded to compensate Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc, $312.50 to compromise non-payment issues of lunch periods for the 2002 EWM Trucking Contract. Babcock stated that he was sympathetic to the concerns raised by Curfman; however, he believed that the specification document was clear after Staff addressed the inquiry by Curfman prior to when sealed bids were duein the District office. VOTE: Ayes (8), Nayes (4; Babcock, Burma, Gilman, and Nelson); mOtion carriedl Additional Business. There was no additional business. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (8/16/02 - 8/31/02), (9/1/02 - 9/15/02), (9/16/02 - 9/30102) and (10/1/02 - 10/15/02). Skramstad reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. -5230- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October 9, 2002 Page 7 VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Additional Business. Nybeck stated that there was a staff memo in the handout folder that summarized District investments. 4. ADMINISTRATION A. Appointment of nominating committee for 2003 LMCD Board Officers. Foster stated that he had talked to a number of Board members regarding serving on the nominating committee for 2003 LMCD Board Officers. Board members Babcock, Suerth, and Wed have agreed to serve on the nominating committee, with Babcock being the Chair. He asked if other Board members were interested in serving on the nominating committee. McMillan and Van Hercke stated that they were under impression that the members on the nominating committee would be discussed at this meeting, not appointed by the Chair. Babcock stated that he believed that the recommendation of the FOster is consistent with recent years when he served as Chair. Van Hercke stated that she would like to be on the nominating committee, LeFevere stated the by-laws for the District stated that committees may be formed from time to time by resolution by the Board. He questioned whether the nominating committee was created by resolution of the Board; however, members recommended by the Chair for the nominating committee are subject to approval by the Board. Suerth asked if it would be more efficient to have Board Officers serve more than one year. LeFevere stated that the state enabling requires the Chair to be elected on an annual basis, not the remaining three Board Officer positions,. Seuntjens asked if progress was being made to get represeiitation from the City of Victoria on the Board. Foster stated that he had talked to. the Mayor of City of Victoria and that he woUld be getting baCk to her in the future to check on the status of filling the vacant Board position. :. Chair. ..Fpster stated that Babcock, Suerth, Van Heroke, and Wed would serVe on the nominating committee for 2003 ~LMCD Board Officers~ w th Babcock being the Chair, unless there were objections fro~ 'the Board. There were no objections. B. Review of draft letter to be forwarded to LMCD Member Cities regarding Board appointments for 2003. ~Foster asked for comments from the Board on the letter to be sent out to the 14 member cities. Babcock stated that he wOuld like the last two sentences in paragraph two to be a little more firm regarding appointments every three yearsrather than annually, The state enabling requires appointments every three years and the letter will remind the 14 member cities of that. -5231 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October 9, 21)02 page 8 The consensus of the Board was to send the letter out with the changes recommended by' Babcock. C, Additional Business. There was no additional business. 5. LAKE USE & RECREATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVE THE LAKE McMillan stated that the next Advisory Committee meeting was scheduled in the office on Wednesday, 10/30/02, at 11:30 a.m. She added that there is grant money available from the MN DNR for lakescaping projects, with a deadline of November 1st. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Informational Items Nybeck stated that there were a number of items included in the packet and handout folders for informational purposes. These included the latest Executive Director Newsletter, an article from the 10/1/02 Lakeshore Weekly News, and a copy of the news release that terminated the last "High,Water Declaration". Data Practices Discussion Nybeck stated that the Distdct has a policy to copy Board members on correspondence generated by staff on public inquiries and complaints that occur in their city. Confidentiality of this correspondence is essential and he asked LeFevere to elaborate on this. LeFevere stated that state aw either requires the District to release data or it forbids staff from releasing it when requested by the public, in accordance with the Data Practices Act. It is diffiCUlt in some cases to totally understand what data needs to be released and what data cannot be released. If information is released that should not be, the Distdct could be sued, the Distdct could be liable for damages and attorney fees for the other party, and punitive damages are also possible. Board members will generally not receive information that is pdvate data; however, the name of the person on complaint data is protected by the Data Practices: Act and should not be discussed with the public. Foster' stated that he believed that it might make sense to continue the informal poliCy of the District to copy Board members on pertinent complaint correspondence in their city; hOwever, have staff not provide the name of the party involved. Babcock asked LeFevere if there would be a violation of Data Practices Act if Nybeck decided to share the name of the person involved in a complaint situation with the respective Board member from that city. LeFevere stated that it was difficult to answer that question because the law is not that clear. The responsible party for making decisions on the distribution of data is Nybeck, noting that the DiStrict should consider adopting a policy on the distribution of data. He believed that the adoption of a policy woUld better provide the direction -5232- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October 9, 2002 Page 9 that Nybeck needs. If Board members have questions regarding violations of the Data Practices Act, he encouraged them to call either himself or the office. 2002 Water Patrol Project Nybeck stated that he had prepared a memo regarding the payment status of all 14 member cities for this project. Some member cities will be further notified in the near future by him, noting that he might request the assistance of the Board member from city. McMillan stated that she believed the continuation of this project is a top priority project and is essential in the future. She asked Skramstad if there was any support the Board could provide him to back him up on his efforts, noting that she would hate to lose this program in the future. Skramstad stated that 100 percent funding of this program is currently planned for both positions in the 2003 Hennepin County Budget. McMillan stated that she would support the writing of a letter on behalf of the Board of Directors, with a letter wdting campaign supporting campaign from the 14 member cities. She stated that a plan of action was needed and that she would assist Skramstad in this effort. The consensus of the Board was to direCt Skramstad to work with staff on a letter writing campaign to be forwarded to Hennepin County on behalf of the District and possibly the 14 member cities, Cancellation of 10/23/02 Board Meeting Nybeck recommended that the Board might want to consider cancelling the 10123102 Regular Board Meeting since there would only be a few agenda items to discuss at that meeting, MOTION: Nelson moved, Gilman seconded to cancel the Regular Board Meeting scheduled for 10/23/02. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously 8. OLD BUSINESS Skramstad asked for an update on the Six Mile Creek issue with the City of Minnetdsta. Babcock stated that he had received an invitation to attend a working session on the 10/14/02 to further discuss the issues. He encouraged Knuds. en and any other Board members interested to attend the working session because he believed that it was an open meeting. He stated that he would keep the Board informed on the discussions at this meeting. 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business, 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION. Performance Evaluation of Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to conduct evaluation in closed session). Foster stated that he was not prepared to discuss this agenda item at this meeting. He had talked to Nybeck regarding this and he reported that it would be discussed at the 11/13/02 Regular Board Meeting. -5233- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting October 9, 21)02 Paget0 1t. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:51 p.m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -5234- NOVEMBER 2002 VOLUME I ISSUE 3 XcelEner y- Energy So'lutions INSIDE HVAC Head Start Energy-recovery ventilator pretreats outside air for more efficient heating and cooling. Page 2 Why Wait? Our Financing program offers competitive rates for energy and process improvements. Page 3 Keeping Warm What's the forecast for winter natural gas prices? Page 3 Operational Tune-Ups Recommissioning gets Fairview- University Medical Center back to peak energy efficiency. Page 4 To Our Business Partners This has been a challenging year for the utility industry, for Xcel Energy and for many of our customers. You recently may have read or heard criticism of our efforts to restore our subsidiary NRG Energy to a strong financial footing. In this issue of Energy Solutions we want to assure you that we are managing the current situation so it will not jeopardize the finandal health of our core utility business or affect our quality of service. NRG's financial problems are separate from our utilities. NRG is involved in unregulated energy businesses such as wholesale power generation. Xcel Energy's core utilities are regulated and separate from our unregulated businesses. Our recent derision to take a $2 billion charge to our third quarter earnings on our NRG holdings will not affect our ratepayers. We're here for the long haul. Xcel Energy's core business - providing electric service and natural gas to our -5235- customers - is the heart of our company, and it remains strong. We have tangible assets, and we operate in a healthy service territory. Your satisfaction is our goal. Ongoing research with our customers helps us gauge their satisfaction levels and identify steps we can take toward providing consistently excellent customer service. Our large business customers tell us that reliability is key. In 2002, through September, an average of 93 percent of our large busIness customers have responded positively when asked to rate our service reliability. Because severe weather, animals, equipment failure and human interference all can cause outages, we can't promise 100 percent rehabili~ We know that every outage at your facility is an inconvenience or worse, so we spend more than $900 million annually on operations, maintenance and construction on our energy delivery business. We work hard CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 We spend more than $900 million annually on operations, maintenance and construction on our energy delivery business. TO OUR BUSINESS CUSTOMERS, CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 to make the best of our budget dollars by carefully prioritizing and managing projects and performing reliability-centered maintenance on our ~tem. "Our reliability should continue to improve as we work to make the best use of our investment dollars," says Ken Zagzebski, vice president, Field Operations. We're committed to your success. As your energy partner, we offer programs and services that can help you save energy and money while increasing efficiency and even productivity at your facility. More than 92 percent of you tell us that you consider us your energy experts. Our rates remain among the lowest in the country. Xcel Energy runs some of the nation's most efficient and successful power plants, ranking high in availability and other factors. Innovative approaches such as repowering coal-fired generators with more efficient natural gas help us cut emissions while increasing generating capacity. And our conservation programs have helped us reduce electric demand in our Northern region by the equivalent of two large power plants, helping us save money and protect the environment. Please visit us at www. xcelenergy, com. You'll Rd a wealth of information about our programs and services as well as updates on NRG and our financial situation. Custom Efficiency Project Solves HVAC Problems Case Stud~ Fastenal, located in Winona, Minn., is the largest fastener distributor in the nation. Building: The HVAC system for Fastenal's main building includes six rooftop heating and cooling units. This system was unable to adequately cool the amount of incoming outside air required to maintain indoor air quality standards for five classrooms in the building. Adding an energy-recovery ventilator was an economical solution that immediately solved the air-treatmem problem. Fastenal qualified for a rebate through the Custom Efficiency program, which offers incentives for processes or equipment that does not qualify for other Xcel Energy programs. Required Results: · Maintain indoor air quality and comfortable temperatures in classrooms without increasing the size of the current HVAC system. · Dehumidify incoming outside air without increasing energy USe during the summer. · Decrease energy use for humidification during dry winter months. · Preheat incoming outside air during cold winter months to save on heating costs. Custom Efficiency Solution: Fastenal installed an energy-recovery ventilator that pretreats outside ventilation air for the rooftop cooling units. The energy-recovery ventilator allows the [iVAC system to meet indoor air quality ventilation standards while controlling energy costs, indoor temperatures a~d humidity levels. Benefits and Results: The energy-recovery ventilator provided Fastenal's most cost-effective solution: · Incoming air is pretreated - prewarmed and prehumidified In winter, precooled in summer - with energy recovered from exhaust air · Existing systems now satisfy the cooling load without the purchase of additional cooling capacity Financial Summary: Estimated total project cost: $10,000 Xcel Energy rebates earned: $ 2,360 After-rebate cost: $7,640 Annual energy savings (electric and gas): $3,200 Payback term: 2.4 years The Program: Custom Efficiency is brought to you by ConservattonWise from Xcel Energys" Our Custom Effidency program offers rebates based on energy savings and funding for engineering studies and financing. Pre-approval is required prior to equipment purchase. Rebates are available for · more effident than existing equipment · new equipment with an effidency rating higher than standard The Custom Effidency program is amilable in Minnesota. We encourage you to submit proposals that are unique to your operations. Call the Business Solutions Center or visit www. xcelenergy, com for more projects that involve installing equipment that is: information. Program restrictions may apply. -5236- Higher Winter Gas Prices in Forecast There's mixed news in gas-price forecasts for the winter of 2002-2003. Regionally, wholesale gas prices in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin and Michigan are forecast to be in a range of $3.00 to $4.25/dekatherm for the upcoming winter. This forecast implies that prices will be about 50 percent higher than last winter, but that's still 45 percent lower than the winter of 2000-2001. Like other natural gas utilities, Xcel Energy passes on the cost of natural gas to customers without adding a penny to the price. The cost of ~vholesale natural gas makes up about 63 percent of a commercial customer's total natural gas bill. Another 16 percent of the bill is for interstate pipeline transportation, a cost that is not expected to change significantly this winter. The remaining 21 percent of the bill covers costs of local distribution gas mains, service lines to individual homes, meters and other operating expenses, This projected rise in prices assumes a recovering economy resulting in increased demand over last year, normal weather compared to last year's warmer-than-normal weather and a deteriorating supply outlook. To help mitigate any unforeseen price spikes, we have contracts 'in place for our winter system demand and are using hedging instruments. With Competitive Financing Available, Why Wait? Xcel Energy offers finandng to help you make energy and process improvements that will give your business a competitive edge. Financing is subject to bank approval. Once approved, you can take advantage of these benefits: · No down payment · Loans cover qualifying equipment and contract labor, or study costs over $1,000 · Competitive interest rates and terms up to five years · Flexible loan amounts to meet your needs · Make payments on your monthly Xcel Energy bill Call the Business Solutions Center at 1-800-481-4700 or visit www. xcelenergy, eom for an application or for more information. Looking for ways to make your company more profitable and productive? Xcel Energy's programs and services .can help you save money and energy at your facility, Call the Business Solutions Center at 1-800-481-4700 or visit us at www, xcelenergy, com for more information, -5237- Energy ,utions Case Study: Fairview-University Medical Center, University of Minnesota Campus, Minneapolis, Minn. BUilding: Nme-story, 585,000-square-foot acute-care facility was built in the mid-1980s, Vapor-compression chillers are used for cooling with steam-absorption as a back-up system. Steam-to-hot-water Converters suPPlY hot water to reheat coils, radiators and ceiling radiation panels. Required Results: This RecommisSioning effort focuses on two factors that affect a hospital's profitability: Its ability tO Provide a healthy, comfortable environment for patients, staff and visitors, and to control energy costs, a significant portion of its operating costs. The project's goals include; iMaintain reliabili~ty,~mO9 ~or.~r tB~ and comfort level while minimizin~ ~o m~!~¢:0 ongoing energy savings. ::~-" '~'.-: ~-~%: .. · Maintain betier control of steam and Chilled,water systems and increase chiller and pump efficiency. · Increase knowledge of facility maintenance staff. Recommissioning Solutions: · Install automatic controls for the chiller plant. EstablLsh reset schedules and procedures tO optimize the chiller and chilled-water pump. · Bring hot-water and chilled-water processes into balance. Install speed controls and new differential pressure sensors for hot-water pumps. · Calibrate zone thermostats. · Rebalance the exhaust system and establish a damper position to increase air exchanges and maintain indoor air quality. · Repair or replace Ilex ducts and reheat control valves as needed. · Provide additional training for facility maintenance staff. The PrOgram: Reeommissioning is brought to you by SiteWise from Xcel £nergM" Think0fRecomr~s~.si0ning as~ tune-!!p for.ypur, facility's,exi~g.. mechanicM s~s{em~2 ~ y0~r :bui~-.ding age;TkeY ~qtfipmeqt, ~ii' ~stems~ may nm .differently or !eSs.'efficiently than:intendedbemUi~e 0f'~erionnel ~ changes' 8r.:hadvertent.mo~calio/!s. ThroUgh a S~tem~e investigative servi~i <~1 imPiementa%n pi<; .Recm.ssmingm beip g%yoUr huil~g:back tO:peak energy effiCiefi6y,aid ;alU,able rebat~ii~'~ ' .part of the ~aCkage. '~r~e ~eco~o~g:progrm is a;~b!~.~ta,.~di~e: are, i:. resections may.,appt~, ..... ........ ,,~,~. ...... Financial Summary: ~sQmated to~ proiect cost: Xcel Energy rebates earned: After-rebate cost: Annual energy savings (steam and electric): Payback term: ~ XcelEnergy' I~0. Box 840 Oenvec CO 80201-0840 1-800-481-4700 www.xcelenergy.colr $210,000 $ ~5,000 $165,000 $180,000 11 months 02-10-015 © 2002 Xcel Energy Inc, XcelEnergy' 414 Nicorlet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401-1993 ************************ 553 Edward Shuclde Jr. Mound City Of 5341 Ma.vwood Rd Mound, MN 55364, I687 l, hi,,Ll,,,fl:,,ll,,,l,,I,,,ll,li,,I,,I,l,,,Ll,,i,,,llil,,,! PRESORTED ~: FIRST CLASS MAIL U,S. POSTAGE PAID MINNEAPOLIS MN Permit No. 3580 -5238- You are invited to attend one of Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' Infiltration and Inflow Meetings December 9, 10, 11 and 12 Discussion will include diminished capacity in the treatment system, increased cost to customer communities and new regulations from the EPA. Inflow Sourcesli Infiltration Sources -5239- Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' Infiltration and Inflow Meeting Schedule/Locations (Maps to locations enclosed) Monday, December 9, 2002 (8:00 am-9:30 am) Maplewood Community Center (Continental Breakfast) 2100 White Bear Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota Phone: (651) 779-3555 Tuesday, December 10, 2002 (8:00 am-9:30 am) Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center (Continental Breakfast) 5600 85th Avenue North Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443 Phone: (763) 493-8363 Wednesday, December 11, 2002 (8:00 am-9:30 am) Apple Valley Municipal Center (Continental Breakfast) 7100 West 147th Street Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124-9016 Phone: (952) 953-2500 Thursday, December 12, 2002(12:00 noon-l:30 pm) Minnetonka Community Center (Light Lunch) 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone: (952) 939-8390 Reserve your spot at one of these meetings by December 6th-, Call Debra Rose at (651) 602-1479 or e-mail Debra at debra.rose@metc.state.mn.us If responding by e-mail or voice mail... · please identify the meeting you wish to attend, · leave your name and title (please spell your name for name badges), and · identify your organization. -5240- November 20, 2002 To: City Managers Finance Directors City Engineers Public Works Directors Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) is holding four meetings in December to discuss the problem of infiltration and inflow (I/I) and we encourage you (or your designee) to attend one of these meetings and to be part of the solution to this problem. The council has recently completed a comprehensive master plan for its interceptor system. A major conclusion from this effort is that UI from some communities is exceeding the original basis for the design of several major interceptors. The current levels of I/I are consuming the interceptor capacity that was originally allocated for future development.'. If these excessive wet weather flows are not reduced, the risk of overflows will increase each year as growth continues in the metropolitan service area. To reduce the risk to acceptable levels, the Council is faced with spending hundreds of millions of dollars on relief sewers and pump station expansions or working with communities to reduce the entry of clear water into the sewer system. The current forecast for population growth and the latest evaluation of the interceptor system have pointed out the urgency in dealing with the I/I issue. For over 30 years communities have struggled with UI but growth these last three decades has taken out the "extra" capacity of the Council's system. The problem is too large to address without involving the communities and stakeholders who ultimately pay the bills. Please join us to hear an overview of the Infiltration and Inflow problem we face as a region and take part in the discussion on how best to address the problem. -5241 - Metropolitan Council Members Chair: Ted Mondale Council Members: Saundra Spigner District 1 Todd Paulson District 2 Mary Hill Smith District 3 Julius C. Smith District 4 Phil Riveness District 5 Frank Hornstein District 6 George Gamett District 7 Carol Kummer District 8 Natalie Haas Steffen District 9 James Nelson District 10 Roger Williams District 11 Council Regional Administrator: Lee Sheey Marc Hugunin Daniel Gelles Lee Pao Xiong Tom Egan John Conzemius District 12 District 13 District 14 District 15 District 16 MCES Executive Team Bill Moore, MCES General Manager Leisa Thompson, Deputy General Manager, Treatment Services Keith Buttleman, Assistant General Manager, Environmental Quality Assurance Bryce Pickart, Assistant General Manager, Technical Services .Bill Moeller, Assistant General Manager, Interceptor Services Karen Neis, Manager, Environmental Services Administration Jason Willett, Manager, Environmental Services Finance 2 Metropolitan Council Building communities that work -5242- Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' Infiltration and Inflow Meetings Location information' and maps Monday, December 9, 2002 (8:00 am-9:30 am) Maplewood Community Center (Continental Breakfast) 2100 White Bear Avenue - Maplewood, Minnesota - Phone: (651) 779-3555 Maplewood Community Center is located on White Bear Avenue about 2 miles south of Interstate 694 and a half mile south of Highway 36. Co. Rd. B Community ~ m Hwy212 U.I O Center ~ Hwy$ ~ J !-94 / / -5243- Tuesday, December 10, 2002 (8:00 am-9:30 am) Brooklyn Park Community Activity Center (Continental Breakfast) 5600 85th Avenue North - Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443 Phone: (763) 493-8363 From the North: Take Hwy 10, to Hwy 610 South, to Hwy 252 South, to 85th Ave. North. Go West (right) on 85th for 2.25 miles. The Center is located between Regent and Zane Avenues on 85th and will be on your right. From the South: Take 35W North, to 94 West, to Hwy 252 North, to 85th Avenue North. Go West (left) on 85th for 2.25 miles. The Center is located between Regent and Zane Avenues on 85th and will be on your fight. From the East: Take Hwy 694 West, to 252 North, to 85th Ave. North. Go West (left) on 85th for 2.25 miles. The Center is located between Regent and Zane Avenues on 85th and will be on your right. From the West.: Take Hwy 169 North, to 85th Ave. North. Go East (right on 85th for 3 miles. The Center is just past Zane Avenue on the left. 93rd Ave. N Community Activity Center 86th Ave. 85th Ave. -5244- Thursday, December 12, 2002 (12:00 noon-l:30 pm) Minnetonka Community Center (Light Lunch) 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard - Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone: (952) 939-8390 Center Mlnnetonlc~ Bird, ~'~ Crosstown N · Ex~lelorBkd. -5245- Wednesday, December 11, 2002 (8:00 am-9:30 am) Apple Valley Municipal Center (Continental Breakfast) 7100 West 147th Street - Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124-9016 Phone: (952) 953-2500 From Cedar Avenue, turn east on 147th Street (Applebee's Restaurant on Corner). The Municipal Center is on the right just before the intersection of Galaxie and 147th. From County Road 42, turn north on Galaxie Avenue to 147th Street. Turn left on 147th and left into the Municipal Center parking lot. -5246- 4071 Sunset Drive ID, ox 385 Spring Park, MN $5384,,0385 Phor~. 952-47t-7125 Fax. 952-471-9151 E-mail- Irncc~uswest. net Pages.. Phone~ CC: [] Urgent [~ For Review [] PIE~e O~nme~ [] Please Reply (-i Ple~e Rec]fcle · Comments: you do not receive ali of the pages, please contact our office as soon as possible at 1152-47'1-7t2; -5247- ii-zi-zee~ ll:48RM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 47~0620 P.02 -5248- 11-~1-~00~ lI:49AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4928628 P.03 -5249- TOTRL P,03 THE GILLESPIE CENTER 2590 COMMERCE BOULEVARD - MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 November 13, 2002 Dear Community Friends, We are very pleased to announce that because of our wonderful community (and most especially the Gillespie Family Fund) we were able to celebrate our first anniversary of the Gillespie Center. We all now can feel the pride of a job well done. This goal was achieved because of civic groups, veteran organizations, churches, school staff and students, local businesses, cities and community members of all ages. The Gillespie Center is a shining example of "what a community can do" and will long serve as a model to the furore generations. During the past year the Center has been a busy meeting place for weddings, family and civic gatherings, conferences, classes, seminars and other community events. However, it most visibly serves as the focal point of our senior citizens services for the area. During the past year we served 1,892 elderly by providing: · 17,140 rides to seniors with our Dial'a-Ride transportation system · 12,896 nutritional meals in our Senior Dining program · 452 educational and recreational events · Information and referral services Volunteer and leadership opportunities for 258 seniors · Counseling and case management for fi:ail elderly to help them maintain their independence in the community The Gillespie Center is owned and operated by the Senior Citizens and with the help of their fundraising efforts combined with rental income the building will be maintained and cared for in a prudent manner. Most of the fundraising is done with dinners, raffles, boutiques, sales, and direct appeal. This Annual Appeal is one of the ways that our community can help out. Our goal is to raise $50,000 to pay for all of the utilities, insurance and maintenance of the building. We hope that you can find it in your hearts and finances this year to contribute to this worthy cause. If you would like to give a holiday gift in honor of someone or as a memorial, please indicate on the form and we would be most happy to send them an acknowledgment. Check with your employer about the possibility of matching funds. Thank you for reading this appeal letter and we hope you will consider us in your donation plans. Happy holidays to you and your family! Sharon McMenamy Cook President, Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation Jack Weist Chair, Gillespie Center Advisory Council Owned and Operated by Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation Phone: 952-472-6-~25OZaX: 952-472-6505 ill CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT Oct. 2002 83.33% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from other FUi~ds Charges to Other Departments Oct. 2002 YTD PERCENT 2,253,520 0 1,037,965 (1,215,555) 46.06% 6,300 0 7,375 1,075 117.06% 188,450 25,820 208,599 20,149 110.69% 461,130 170,851 403,098 (58,032) 87.42% 137,550 12,750 94,407 (43,143) 68.63% 110,000 0 63,311 (46,689) 57.56% 145,400 23,306 151,986 6,586 104.53% 128,000 0 0 (128,000) 0.00% 13.000 116 12.632 ,(368) 97.17% TOTAL REVENUE 3.443.350 232.843 1.979,373 (1.463.977) 57.48% FIRE FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCK FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND RECYCLING FUND STORM WATER UTILITY 429,470 53,712 456,557 27,087 106.31% 6,050 0 4,285 (1,765) 70.83% 129,360 0 113,932 (15,428) 88.07% 535,500 42,741 474,936 (60,564) 88.69% 1,048,810 85,004 884,632 (164,178) 84.35% 2~050,000 144,461 1,556,902 (493,098) 75.95% 1271880 6~820 116,719 (11,161) 91.27% 112,000 9,082 92,484 (19,516) 82.58% 11/18~2002 rev01 Gino -5251 - CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT Oct. 2002 83.33% Oct. 2002 YTD PER. CENT BUDGET ~ EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDE__D GENERAL FUND Council 79;280 2,392 71,717 7,563 90.46% City Manager/Clerk 235,100 25,987 197,011 38,089 83.80% Elections 11,030 331 4,991 6,039 45.25% Finance 201,260 21,505 165,523 35,737 82.24% Assessing 79~700 10 77,317 2,383 97.01% Legal 122,000 11,263 90,311 31,689 74.03% City Hall Building & Srvcs 89,110 6,619 66,412 22,698 74.53% Computer 2~i~50 421 21,341 6,909 ?5.54% Police 1,164,600 103,378 831,066 333,534 71.36% Emergency Prepardeness 6;780 44 6,790 (10) 100.15% Planning/Inspections 266,030 27,906 249,007 17,023 93.60% Streets 576,610 49,285 419,514 157,096 72.76% Parks 322,240 26,497 261,331 60,909 81.10% Transfers 207,840 17,320 173,200 34,640 83.33% Cable TV 48,000 0 22,716 25,284 47.33% Contingencies 60!,860 66 755 60.105 !.24% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3.498,690 ..293,024 2.659.002 839.688 76.00% Area Fire Service Fund 699,470 Cemetery Fund 9,920 Dock Fund 132,700 TIF 1-2 0 Water Fund 577,660 Sewer Fund 1,007,420 Liquor Fund 460,660 Recycling Fund 155,510 Storm Water Utility 58,200 25,373 432,979 266,491 61.90% 0 1,258 8,662 12.68% 3,271 44,591 88,109 33.60% 5,619 581,921 (581,921) 29,613 502,936 74,724 87.06% 85,970 824,904 182,516 81.88% 29,815 364,217 96,443 79.06% 16,212 108,410 47,100 69.71% 4,239 50,199 8,001 86.25% Exp-02 11/18~2002 Gino -5252- General Fund $900,348 CDBG 1,114 Area Fire Protection Services 303,646 Grant Revolving 0 Cemetery 437 Dock 196,931 PW Facility 105,282 G.O. Improvement Bonds (36,752) Commerce Place TIF (193,606) TIF 1-2 Notes 25,578 G.O. Bonds 2001 - A 4,263 G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 19,147 HRA Lease Rev Bonds 718,278 Capital Improvement 7,110,580 MSA 19,997 Sealcoat 1,259 CDB 2,097 Downtown TIF 1-2 (1,878,028) Water 1,248,754 Sewer 1,150,263 Liquor Store 887,497 Recycling 87,399 Storm Water 624,710 Fire Relief (76,139) HRA 2,541 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not Included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an efflcial Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to Interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 11/15/2002 CashReportCouncil Gino -5253- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com November, 21, 2002 Mayor, Barbara Peterson City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mayor Peterson: I want to thank you for your letter of October 3, 2002. It addressed a host of matters of great concern to both of our cities and, because of the scope of the points you raised, it has taken some time to prepare an adequate response. As you know over the years Mound has been able to develop a truly exceptional fire department. Your reference to continuing increases in cost is true. In our case a new modem facility is required to cover the considerable growth in the cities we serve; since the existing frre station was built 50 years ago. The decision to construct the facility included an analysis of how it will be financed. Mound informed all fire contract cities of its intent to proceed with a facility improvement project at an open meeting on March 14, 2001. To that end, Mound began discussions with ail of the contracting communities last year to discuss how the costs of the fire station portion of the new building would be apportioned between Mound and the contracting cities. For example, on November 14, 2001 at our quarterly MoUnd Fire commission meeting the facility financing options were discussed on April 22, 2002 our City Manager and Fire Chief gave a Presentation to your Council; and on June 12, 2002 we began meeting with all contract cities to review the more detailed economics of the frre facility and the allocation. Those meetings continued on July 2, July 24, and August 6, 2002. In addition to those meetings, contracting cities were provided with estimated operating budgets and cost allocations on a number of occasions throughout the spring and summer of this year. For example, to assist your city in soliciting other proposals for fire service, we-provided your administrator with several items of data on May 23, 2002. Included was an "Estimated operating budget and anticipated contributions by each service area city for the next five years 2002-2006." As more detailed information became known about the costs of the new fire facility, those numbers were updated at least twice (June 26, 2002 and approximately September 1, 2002), and your representatives were provided with all such revisions. Also, on September 23, 2002, at Orono's request, Mound submitted a proposal for fire protection printed on recycled paper -5254- service to Orono. The proposal actually included the estimated budget for service for Orono in 2003, including allocation of the cost of the new facility. Mound is as keenly aware as any city of the need to have useful data available when budgets are being formulated. Our every effort was to provide Orono and the other contract communities with the best estimates available, and to update them with new data as it became available. I understand that all of the other communities are using that data in the formulation of their 2003 budgets. It is abundantly clear to me that we did this in your case, and that by October 1, 2002, you had very good data upon which to make budget decisions concerning the cost of the fire service for 2003. Mound also provided final 2003 budget detail to all contract cities on October 30, 2002 at the quarterly Mound Fire commission meeting. Due to the fact that building construction costs increase every year, delay in building a fire facility will simply add even more to the total costs for all of our service cities. I also agree with you that fire trucks have become increasingly expensive. We typically have set aside money every year until enough has been accumulated to purchase a new truck. Our last truck, a pumper which cost about $264,000.00, was purchased to service all cities, including Orono. I would hope that this would demonstrate our commitment to taking care of the needs of all cities we cover. I am not sure which truck you refer to that cost $600,000.00, but it was not a track we purchased. However, your point is well taken as it demonstrates the concern we all have with regard to ever increasing costs. It makes it all that much more important that cities pool resources to share expensive equipment. Throughout the process every effort has been made to communicate with the other cities, including Orono. We started the process of talking to all the cities way back in spring of 2001. Our Fire Chief and City Manager made a presentation to the council of each city we serve. This presentation included, of course, the Orono City Council. It was not until over a year later that we became aware of Orono's idea to construct a satellite building in Navarre. As a result of Orono's request, we offered to form a task force to examine every possible concern from each of the cities that we service. We did not receive a reply from Orono with regard to this offer. Instead, we were told Orono was only interested in the satellite station, which you wanted to build in Navarre. In response to .Orono's inquiry, our Fire Chief, Greg Pederson, went to great effort to investigate your request and respond to you. He explained that we simply didn't have the manpower or the equipment to staff such a facility. He also cited the logistic problems such as which fire trucks would be assigned to the satellite, which firefighters would respond to which firehouse, the added expense for duplicating personnel, equipment, apparatus, etc. I took note of your comments that you met several times with Mound and the other serviced cities and that in those meetings you "have continually proposed other options to be considered by Mound in relation to the fire station and the fire station funding." I am not aware of any of these options to which you are referring. You have asked only about the satellite station in Navarre, and after we explained that it was not a feasible option. -5255- Although I understand them, I cannot agree with your comments regarding the Oct. 3ra meeting and also your decision not to attend. You received an agenda for the meeting well in advance. (I am enclosing another copy of the agenda). Please review this agenda. I believe that it was clear from the scope and content of this agenda that we were open to exploring every possible option. The result of our failure to meet has been the loss of valuable time, which, as you know, has handicapped our efforts to plan and budget for the future. Your letter also addresses the relationship beyond 2003. I understand, and applaud your desire to find the best service at the best price for the residents of Orono. You may find that an acceptable balance between quality of service and cost can be found through a relationship that does not involve Mound. I will be sorry if Orono makes that decision, because we have valued the relationship with Orono and do not wish to see it end. However, I am responsible to the citizens of Mound and I cannot think of a way to explain to them why they must pay for the new fire building, while residents of Orono, who are being given full access to our fire services, do not. Finally, you allude in your letter to expanded discussions between all "stakeholders" for the purpose of finding a "win-win" solution. I think I already have the solution: Orono continues to receive high quality fire protection service from Mound and pays its allocated share of the budget. This is the approach all of the other communities have chosen. Because time is short and Mound will need to make decisions before the end of this year, I would ask that you let me know by December 5, 2002 whether Orono intends to pay its allocated 2003. share of the cost of the new facility as shown in the September 23, 2002 RFP, and again confirmed in the final budget numbers provided to you on October 30, 2002. Sincerely, Pat Meisel Mayor, City of Mound -5256- ~002 Mayor Pat'Meisel City of MoUnd 5341 MayW0od Road MoUnd, MN 55364-1627 Dear Mayor Meisel: CITYof ORONO Municipal Offices Street Address: Mailing Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 OrOno, MN' 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323.0066 I am writing regarding the postponement of our meeting of October 3 until the City of Orono is in a better position to make both short term and long term decisions regarding the provision of fire service. The Cities of Orono and Mound have had a long and cooperative relationship for the provision of fire service. Until' Very recent Years, Orono did not give this relationship a second thought, as service quality Was high and costs were relatiVely Stable: In ree~nt years, althOttgh Service qual. itY has remained high, costs have b · · "~,i4 ' . . egun mcre~ii4g~s~,grn,., ficantly, p ~a~. icularly capital co~ts, With the new Mound fire facili~ being the mo : - ficafi "ex i ie.- .... This is a trend that is not: limited to MoUnd, as we are seeing large expenditures in the capital budge~ts .of the various fire departments that serve portions of Orono. This.~rend. is exacerbated by. the-spiraling increases in the cost of fire apparatus and fire facilities, In the past,.a fire station, was a bare concrete block building, and,tankers were.fabricated by firefighters from used milk tanks. This is in sharp contrast to' $3 millioa fire stations and $600,000 aerial apparatus. The changes, .upgrades, and higher costs are necessary to meet current Standards for-fire department operations. However, when cities are faced with paying significant portions of ~ultip!e. pis ~.~.e{.!arge cap]ta[.:e, xpendituresacross mukiple departments, iris imperative .~ho~; those cities.ensured:tho;se expenditures are necessary,, 'and/or determine whether.:.a ,new plan and .arrangement for tSre service provision could reduce the need for these large ,capital, expenditures, When M~Und'.~hared its COnceptual fire StatiOn plans and costs ~ith"i~}fire sercice citie~ if~'J-anu~'~f~'2~'O~;"Orono'adviSedM6und'~at'r~t~e~than pWifi~:'~'P~6n'of'~he C~i of' the..Mound :fire" §tati0ni"~hO City Was Consid~rihg Whe~ to" i~gt.~ad ~d'a ri'ei~b6fho6d fire station in Nav~e. Since ~er/;'"th'e City has requested Proposals for the provision of fire s.e~iqe"[o the ~;ou~west quadrant-of Otono.;.. 'TheC~ty has received two responses and is awaiting, a third ffer the C~ received the'financial package ~d'Propbsed tegolUti6ia fela~e~t"to fifikncial ' participatiOn.'i'n the M0md fire Station pr~0j~cf, We.met s~Vefal: times ~ Mouriit!~d~,flae other fire:service cities:'. In all otthose meetings, w6 have c0ntinuall2 Proposed Other options to be considered by'Momd in r~lati°n'i~ the fire ~tation and tl~e fire station Telephone (952) 249~4600 · Fax (952) 2494616 WWW_~257_nn.us Mayor Pat Meisel October3, 2002 Page 2 funding. We have received no response from the M~und City Council regarding these sgggested options. The only response we have received frOm you is that if Orono dOes not pay the costs of the new frre station, Mound will not provide fire service to Orono. When Orono received the invitation from Mound to meet on October 3, Orono believed the meeting would be an opportunity to continue to explore options for the funding of the proposed new fire station, and to begin to focus on a broader view of fire service provision. Your City Manager recently indicated to Orono's City Administrator, that the purpose of and expectations for the October 3 meeting was to obtain a clear decision from Orono about whether we are willing to commit to continuing to receive fire service from Mound in 2003 and to renew for an additional three-year period beyond 2003. As indicated below, Orono believes the 2003 service issue was resolved by the non- cancellation of the frre service contract. Orono is currently exploring both short term and long term fire service options With multiple fire dep~ent~ prior to making a determination regarding fire service provisiOn for the years 2004 and beyond. Orono's current status with Mound regarding fire service is. that the fire:service contract has been renewed for 2003, which means Orono will receive fire service from Mound in 2003 and will be obligated to pay its. share oft}ie 2003 fire service costs as reflected in the. 2003 budget package received from Mound on August 6, 2002. This budget package did not include any costs related to the debt service on the proposed new fire station. You have indicated that if Orono does not agree to pay the 2003 debt service cost related to the new fire station, Mound Will not prov,ide fire service to Orono in 2003. From Orono"s perspective, the automatic renewal of the fire service contract meahs we are · committed to continuing to receive fire service from Mound in 2003, and Mbund is committed to providing fn'e service in 2003. At this pOint, it is Mound who has not agreed to'serve Orono in 2003. The decision regarding committing to a three-year agreement for the years 2004 through 2006 is a more difficult issue. Orono is currently in discussions with numerous, fire departments regarding options for the provisiofa of fire service. Orono and. the three other cities who receive fire service from Maple Pl,'have S'Uggested to Maple Plan tha~'for a period of:two years fire service costs remain' generally at status 'quo with ~or cost-Of- living adjustments to necessary expenditures to enable a tran'siti0n period for a Plug and study process regarding fire service provision. In addition, as. indiCatedabove, Or0no has received two re~pon~es t0its f~e s~rvice RFP, and is awaiting a third response. It would not be produ¢five t° meet with the p~ose of:making a decision'r~ega~ding a three- year ~newal of the f~e s~rvi% con/ra~t u~iil'~br0n0 has a clearer picture (~fthe options available for fire service for the neXt five years, ten years and twenty years. As we prepare for a future meeting to.resolve:'the outstanding issues related to the fire station and begin to plan for furore fire service provision, it is important that we have a common understanding regarding the meeting format and process to be followed to ensur~ these. nieetings are product~ve. The agenda and fOrmat sUggested by the agenda for the October 3 meeting doeS not lend itself to facilitating a productive meet~g process. From Orono's standpoint, the key princiPles of a prodUCtiVe meeting are as follows: -5258- Mayor Pat Meisel October 3, 2002 Page 3 1. 2. 3. 4. All stakeholders need to be involved in all meetings. All participants need to have the same ability to participate in the meeting. All participants are treated with respect. The goal of the meeting is to facilitate a positive, productive discussion that can generate numerous options, and result in a win-win solution. The operational approach is one of teamwork. I look forward to a meeting of the Mound fire service cities in the near future to develop a win/win solution regarding the provision of fire service to the cities served by the Mound Fire Department. Sincerely Barbara Peterson Mayor, City of Orono -5259-