Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2003-01-14
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. . qua!ity.Service.S_ that respop~.~o ~e. ~eed~s. 0f~l! c!t!ze, ns,. fo. Ste~gs~is~fe.,_~a~c~y~ and fl0~i~ng co~n~. ~.uni~i. _.. .... MOUND CITY COUNCIL ANNUAL MEETING TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2003; 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. PAGE 1. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE o SWEARING IN OF COUNCIL MEMBERS A. MAYOR PAT MEISEL B. COUNCIL MEMBER MARK HANUS C. COUNCIL MEMBER BOB BROWN D. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVD OSMEK o SPECIAL RECOGNITION OF SERVICE FOR FRANK WEILAND AND ACTION ON RESOLUTION 4. APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: DEC 10, 2002 REGULAR MEETING DEC 23, 2002 SPECIAL MEETING DEC 31, 2002 SPECIAL MEETING 100-105 106-107 108-109 *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 110-171 *C. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPOINTING GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR, ACTING CITY MANAGER FOR 2003 172 *D. APPROVE RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LAKER AS THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 2003 173-175 *E. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK 176 *F. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY TREASURER/ FINANCE DIRECTOR 177 *G. PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. APPROVE RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR 2003 178 o *It. APPROVE I~ESOLUTION APPOINTING COUINCILMI~MBER MARK HANUS AS ACTING MAYOR FOR 2003 (By consensus of the Council, the Acting Mayor term runs concurrem with the term of the Mayor.) *I. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPOINTING JIM FACKLER AS ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR 2003 *J. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPOINTING COUNCIL MEMBERS AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATWES FOR 2003 *K. APPROVE CONTRACT FOR BACKUP BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES BY PAUL WALDRON AND ASSOCIATES *L. APPROVE RESOLUTION AMENDING 2003 FEE SCHEDULE RELATED TO PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FEES (ONLY TITLE PAGE AND CHANGED PAGE (4) INCLUDED IN PACKET- SEE 320.00) *M. APPROVE PAYMENT REQUESTS 1. REQUEST NO. 3 TO SUNRAM'S FOR 2002 RETAINING WALL PROJECT REQUEST NO. 3 TO DAVE PERKIN CONTRACTING, INC FOR 2002 STORM SEWER PROJECT REQUEST NO. 4 TO DOBOSZENSKI & SONS FOR 2002 MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING PROJECT A. REPORT BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER TODD CHRISTOPHERSON B. ACTION MAKING CERTAIN BID AWARDS ACTION ON RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITIZEN APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS A. PLANNING COMMISSION 1. GREG RAINES B. DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION 1. FRANK AHRENS 2. GERALD JONES 179 180 181 182-186 187-189 190-194 195-199 200-205 206-210 211-215 216-2'18 9. APPOINTMENT TO FIRE DISTRICT STUDY GROUP PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CONSDERATION/APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO APPROVE STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TO A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE PURSUANT TO 350.420~ SUBD. 8 - ROBERT HUFFMAN 10. 219-225 11. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. CASE #02-41: METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT MOUND MARKETPLACE PLAZA SIGN HEIGHT VARIANCE 226-265 Bo CASE #03-02/03-03: BRENSHELL HOMES/MARK LEE 1975 LAKESDE LANE MINOR SUBDIVISION/SETBACK VARIANCE 266-294 Co ACTION ON REQUEST BY MIKE KRAMER FOR RELEASE OF T AX FORFEITED PARCEL 295-322 12. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS A. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OFFER - ALFRED & LOIS SAGE - WESTEDGE BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT B. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT FOR LAND 323-332 REGISTRATION ROHULLAH M. AND KRISTI J. VEDADHAGHI 13. INFORMATION/MIS CELLANEOUS A. Correspondence: LMCD 333-360 B. Westonka Public Schools news 361-369 C. Newsletter: Gillespie Center 370 D. Article: State Budget Forecast 371 E. Notice: Charitable Gambling donations 372-374 H. Report: Five Year Comparison Report of Utility Billing Delinquencies 375-377 I. Letter: Mediacom 378-380 J. Letter: Mound Harbor Renaissance 381-383 K. Letter: Hennepin County on redevelopment and the rail 384-385 L. Newsletter: Brimeyer Group 386-387 M. Update: Attorney's opinion on councilmember fundraising activities 388 N. Letter: City of Orono to the City of Long Lake on fire services 389-390 O. Article: Leadership 391 P. AMM Fax News 392-393 Q. Update: Dreamwood Commons suit 394 R. Report: Finance Department through Nov 30 395-397 S. Report: Fire Commission Meeting 398-400 T. Report: Small Pox Vaccination 401-411 U. Report: WAFTA meeting 412-414 14. ADJOURN This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. ci(~,r~£mound, com. COUNCIL BRIEFING January 14, 2003 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Jan 14 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Jan 14 - 7:00 - Meet the new Liquor Store Manager Open House Jan 14 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Jan 15 - Estimated date of' demo of Old Post Office Jan 20 - City Hall closed - Martin Luther King Day Jan 27 - Joint CC/PC Special Meeting Jan 28 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Jan 28 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Jan 29 - 11:00 - Fire Commission meeting (Mayor only) Jan 30 - 6:30 - Volunteer Appreciation at VFW FYI: It has been confirmed that the stop signs installed at the intersection of Belmont and Lynwood do not need council action There will be an open house to meeting new Liquor Store Manager John Colotti between the HRA and CC meetings. Swearing in will take place at both meetings. We will try to schedule pictures at the next meeting. [ ending your approval, Frank Weiland will be honored at this meeting by naming the MetroPlains park after im. He will also be honored at the Volunteer Recognition. The height of the MetroPlains sign has implications for our new Liquor Store. Each retailer will want their business name listed and it takes one foot of space for each one. Some businesses won't be listed at 20'. That should be considered in your decision regarding the sign. Police Chief interviews have been set for 8 a.m.-8 p.m. on Feb 26. Schedule yourselves for the evening Public Forum. Sorry for the brevity. My schedule is very pressed. HAPPY NEW YEAR! MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 10s 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Members Absent: Bob Brown Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Attorney John Cameron, City Planner Bruce Chamberlain, Greg Palm, Rob Rehberger, Billy Huspess, Joey Kuhbander, Matthew Willette, Jeremy Willette, Sephen Sherburre, Chris Motyka, Pam Willette, Ann Everhart, Paul Waldron, Dawn Pistulra. Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVE AGENDA City Manager Hanson requested the addition of item 9A, Post Office Demolition Resolution, and 12A, selection of Liquor Store Manager. Meyer requested the addition of 13H, Bob's Sleep Out Update. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Hanus requested the removal of F and K, Osmek requested the removal of C and I and Meyer requested the removal of E from the consent agenda, for discussion. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of the November 25, 2002 special meeting, the November 26, 2002 regular meeting and December 2, 2002 special meeting. 1 -100- Mound City Council Minutes - December 10, 2002 B. Payment of Claims in the amount of $254,649.66, plus any other claims through to the January 14th Council meeting. C. (removed) D. AMENDMENT TO JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE (WITH MINNETRISTA) E. (removed) F. (removed) G. Approve Partial Payment Request #3 by Buffalo Bituminous for $35,100.55 for work completed through November 30, 2002 on the Westedge Boulevard Street Improvement Project. H. Approve Partial Payment Request #2 from Sunram for $17,201.16 for the 2002 Retaining Wall Replacement project. I. (removed) J. RESOLUTION NO, 02-114: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE TWlNHOMES AT 5214/5218 DRUMMOND ROAD, LOTS 4,5,14 & 15, BLOCK 12, WHIPPLE. PID #25-117- 24-21-0025. P& Z CASE ~J6-44 K. (removed) 4C. JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE BY AND BEWEEN THE CITIES OF MOUND AND ORONO Hanus and Osmek suggested changes to the proposed resolution. Meyer stated he believes that it is in the best interest to continue the agreement with Orono. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution as amended. Those voting in favor: Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. Those voting against: Meyer. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-115: RESOLUTION CANCELLING JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE BY AND BETWEEN THE CITIES OF MOUND AND ORONO. 4E. APPROVAL OF FINAL 2003 BUDGET AND LEVY FOR 2003 Meyer expressed concern about the budget as it doesn't address the needs of everyone, especially the vulnerable. He would like dollars added to Music in the Parks, lifeguards, seniors, etc. Discussion followed regarding these subjects. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. 2 -101 - RESOLUTION NO. 02-116: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL 2003 GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,837,750; SETTING THE LEVY AT $2,814,100; AND APPROVING THE FINAL OVERALL BUDGET FOR 2003. 4F. ADOPTION OF FEE SCHEDULE Hanus expressed concern about the $200 application fee for small Public Lands projects. This fee will be omitted from this schedule and researched further with regards to defining minor and major projects. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-117: RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE 41. EXTENSION AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVlCF Osmek indicated that when the extension was approved to December 15, the City gave them two months rent with no extra fee. He indicated that the proposed penalty is not enough. He suggested changing the one time payment from the proposed $2542.00 to $5,000. Hanus agrees with this change. It was decided that the payment from December 16 through January 5 should be between $4500 and $5000, which gives the City Manager some negotiating space. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve extension of the Lease Agreement with the United States Postal Service, with the current lease from December 16, 2002 through January 5, 2003, for a one time payment of between $4500 and $5000, to be negotiated by the City Manager. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4K. ACTION ON RENTAL SPACE IN THE DEPOT FOR USE BY THE WESTONKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Hanus indicated that he's comfortable with the use of the Depot but expressed concern about liability. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to approve the request and have Kennedy & Graven prepare a lease accordingly. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ONTHEAGENDA None were offered. 6. CSAH 15 STREETSCAPE PLANS Bruce Chamberlain presented the schematic plans for CSAH 15 which will be done in cooperation with the Hennepin County CSAH Alignment Project. The schematic provides an opportunity to review the design as well as discuss preliminary estimated costs. Discussion followed regarding parking and landscaping for Commerce Place, the greenway, street lighting, stormwater ponds, municipal parking lot, park and ride lot, affected properties, the budget, etc. 3 -102- Mound City Council Minutes - December 10, 2002 MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to approve the schematic design and have plans and specifications prepared. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-118: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT - CSAH 15 STREETSCAPE. 7. SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT OF BUILDING OFFICIAL MATT SlMONEAU Matt Simoneau presented a six-month update regarding activities in the Planning and Building Department. Highlights included in-house inspections and updated forms and public informational documents, along with an established schedule for office hours to provide improved customer service. He also presented a Projects List for 2003. The Council commended Simoneau for his six-month progress. Mayor Meisel requested a recess at 9:30 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:40 p.m. 8. ACTION ON PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL WORK PERTAINING TO WELL PROJECT John Cameron explained that additional water samples and testing were necessary for the well project. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to authorize Tasks 1,2 & 3 for a total cost of $6,900, as outlined in the memo from Emmons & Olivier Resources, dated November 27, 2002. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 9. CHANGE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS CONNECTED TO BALBOA LAND PURCHASE MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve the Change Order for Additional Costs Associated with Applying for MPCA Assurance Letters for Lots 23 through 28, Koehlers Addition, in the amount of $2,500. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 9A. POST OFFICE DEMOLITION RESOLUTION MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-119: RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FROM STATE-AID RULE 8820.2800, SUBPART 2. S.A.P. 145-108-05 POST OFFICE DEMOLITION. 4 -103- Mound City Council Minutes - December 10, 2002 10. ANNUAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A. Draft #3 Street Reconstruction Assessment Policies Discussion followed regarding the proposed assessment policies, citing pros and cons of both. John Cameron will email the draft to Councilmembers for their suggested changes. This item will be continued to the January 14th meeting. B. 2003 Street Reconstruction Proiect MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. favor. Motion carried. All voted in RESOLUTION NO. 02-120: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 11. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING A. Update and Discussion on Bid Opening Miles Britz (SEH), Todd Christopherson (Amcon) and Greg Palm (Mound Fire Dept.) wee present to review the bids received for the public safety building. B. Action on Recommendations Christopherson reviewed the recommendations from the building committee. The committee was going to request funds from the contingency account to balance the project budget ($200.960) but has opted not to recommend this now to allow for additional value engineering measures to be undertaken. MOTION by Meyer, seconded by Hanus to: (1) Accept alternate 8 - change from natural stone to form liner stone and decrease construction cost by $61,228; (2) Aware precast concrete contract to Iow bidder, Hanson Spancrete in the amount of $723,334; and (3) Aware steel contract to apparent Iow bidder Thurnbeck Steel Fabricators in the amount of $108,054. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 12. SET JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to meet with the Planning Commission for a joint workshop, either on January 7 or January 27. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 12A, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER Hanson announced that the John Colotti has been offered the position of Liquor Store Manager, contingent on background check and other requirements being met. He will start sometime after the first of the year. 13. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Correspondence: LMCD B. Report: Mound Police Department- Nov 2002 C. Report: 2002 Operation Clean Sweep 5 -104- D. Newsletter: Gillespie Center E. Letter: Metropolitan Council F. FYI: New liquor store construction agreement G. Memo: LMCIT insurance forecast H. Bob's Sleep Out- Meyer commented that this campaign finished last Saturday and raised $750,000 in pledges. 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 10:45 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Rifler, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 6 -105- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 23~ 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Monday, December 23, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, Acting City Manager Gino Businaro, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Building Official Matt Simoneau, Carl Palmquist. 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVE AGENDA MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE LEASE EXTENSION Discussion took place as to the history of the lease and events leading to this point. MOTION by Meisel, seconded by Brown to extend the current lease with the USPS from December 16, 2002 through January 5, 2003 for a one time payment of $2542 plus legal and administrative costs. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. DISCUSSION/ACTION ON SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT AND APPROVING DECLARATION OF EASEMENT (METROPLAINS) John Dean explained that the amendment is to allow earlier conveyance of the trail easements. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-121: RESOLUTION APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT AND APPROVING DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 6. TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY PERMIT - 4500 DENBIGH ROAD Matt Simoneau reviewed the request for temporary occupancy permit by Carl & Patricia Palmquist, 4500 Denbigh Road. DiscussiOn followed regarding the amount of, and need for an escrow deposit to ensure the completion of the retaining walls, along with a time deadline for completion of the 1 -106- Mound City Council Minutes - December 23, 2002 walls, and a deadline for applicant returning the signed occupancy agreement to the City. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution as amended. BroWn called for the vote. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-122: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME LOCATED AT 4500 DENBIGH ROAD. 7. ADJOURN MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 7:52 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -107- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 31, 2002 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Tuesday, December 31,2002, at 12:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, City Engineer John Cameron, Finance Director Gino Businaro. 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 12:34 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVE AGENDA Mayor Meisel requested that item 4 be switched to item 5, and item 5 be switched to item 4. Councilmember Brown arrived at 12:35 p.m. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve the agenda as amended, with items 4 and 5 being switched. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. DISCUSSION ON CITY OF MOUND ACTING AS FISCAL AGENT FOR COUNCILMEMBER MEYER'S FUNDRAISER(S) Osmek questioned the legality of the city acting as fiscal agent for fundraisers, making reference to {}309. He questioned Meyer as to why the contributions can't go directly to the school district, as this is a school district program (lifeguard program). Meyer answered that the City has provided this lifeguard service for the last 52 years and with budget cuts, etc., it's part of his vision to lead the community toward the City's mission statement. Hanus also commented on the benefit of cutting out the City as the middleman in the fundraising for the lifeguard program. MOTION by Hanus seconded by Osmek that, because there is no benefit to the City, the City not act as fiscal agent for Councilmember Meyer's fundraisers, and to direct Staff to provide notice to The Laker to retract that the City is acting is fiscal agent for Meyer's fundraisers. Meyer asked that this item be tabled. It was noted that there is a motion and second to be voted upon. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. 1 -108- Mound City Council Minutes - December 31, 2002 5. PUBLIC HEARING -IMPROVEMENTS TO CSAH 15 (County 15/2002 Project) Dean informed the Council that the 2002 Project and the Improvements to CSAH 15 Project have both approved and this action brings them together into one project for financing purposes. Mayor Meisel called the hearing to order at 12:50 p.m: and asked for public comment. After no comments were heard from the public, Mayor Meisel closed the public hearing at 12:51 p.m. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 02-123: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COUNTY '15~2002. 6. ADJOURN MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 12:51 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -109- DECEMBER 24~ 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 120602SUE $25,925.00 DEC 121102SUE $5,915.37 DEC 121802SUE $1,129.02 DEC 122302SUE $924.62 DEC 122402SUE $354,811.32DEC 123002SU E $171.37 DEC TOTAL $388,876.70 -110- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:05 AM Page 1 Current Period: December 2002 Batch Name 120602SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $25,925.00 Posted Refer 120602 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE Ck# 008970 12/6/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 2003 DURANGO SXT 4X4 $25,925.00 Invoice 120602 PO 17533 Transaction Date 12/6/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $25,925.00 Fund Summary BATCH Total $25,925.00 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $25,925.00 $25,925.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $25,925.0O $o.oo $25,925.00 -111- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:06 AM Page 1 Current Period: December 2002 Batch Name 121102SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $5,915.37 Posted Refer 121102 ROBERTS, COLLETTE Ck# 009059 12/11/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE $320.00 Invoice 121102 Transaction Date 12/6/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $320.00 R refe 121102 HAwKs, SHIRLEY Ck#009055 12/11/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSES $500.00 Invoice 120602 Transaction Date 12/6/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $500.00 Refer 121102 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Ck# 009054 12/11/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 472-0635 $346.53 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 472-0635 $346.54 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 472-0621 $802.24 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Ceils 11-02 472-3093 $163.98 Invoice 113002 Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 472-0600 $999.90 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Ceils 11-02 472-0635 $346.53 Invoice 113002 Transaction Date 12/6/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,005.72 Refer 121102 AT&T Ck#009053 12/11/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 952-250-0429 $33.62 Invoice 112602 Transaction Date 12/6/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $33.62 Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 11-23-02 GAOLINE CHARGES $674.77 Invoice 112302 Transaction Date 12/10/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total ~ $674.77 Refer 121102 PETTY CASH Ck# 009058 12/11/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $25.04 Invoice 121102 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $25.04 Refer 121102 MCKINLEY, JOHN Ck# 009057 12/11/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $845.50 invoice 121102 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $845.50 Refer 121102 SKINNER, GREG Ck# 009060 12/11/2002 ;ash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical and Dental Fees REIMBURSE EYE GLASSES $16.67 Invoice 121102 Cash Payment E 601-49400-305 Medical and Dental Fees REIMBURSE EYE GLASSES $16.67 Invoice 121102 -112- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:06 AM Page 2 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical and Dental Fees REIMBURSE EYE GLASSES $16.66 Invoice 121102 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 12ii02 WEsTONKAWsiON~ENTER Ck#~00906~'1~,;ii;20~2 ' Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical and Dental Fees SKINNER, GREG $148.45 Invoice 849895 Cash Payment E 601-49400-305 Medical and Dental Fees SKINNER, GREG $148.45 Invoice 849895 Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical and Dental Fees SKINNER, GREG $148.46 Invoice 849895 Transaction Date 12112/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $445.36 Refer 121102 HEIT-Z, FRANK Ck# 009056 12/11/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $15.36 Invoice 120502 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $15.36 Fund Summary BATCH Total $5,915.37 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUQR FUND 10100 MarqueEeBank Mound $4,028.27 $674.77 $511.65 $511.66 $189.02 $5,915.37 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $5,915.37 $o.oo $5,915.37 -113- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 g:06 AM Page 1 Current Period: December 2002 Batch Name 121802SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $1,129.02 Posted Refer 121802 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Ck# 009064 12/18/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 472-0646 $19.15 Invoice 121802 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 472-3555 $207.65 Invoice 121802 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $226.80 Refer 121802 MCKINLEY, JOHN Ck# 009065 12/18/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $650.65 Invoice 121802 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $650.65 Refer 121802 MOUND POSTOFFICE Ck# 009066 12/18/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage UTILITY BILLINGS $125.78 Invoice 121802 Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage UTILITY BILLINGS $125.79 Invoice 121802 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $251.57 Fund Summary BATCH Total $1,129.02 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $669.80 $207.65 $125.79 $125.78 $1,129.02 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $1,129.02 $0.00 $1,129.02 -114- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:06 AM Page 1 Current Period: December 2002 Batch Name 122302SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $924.62 Posted Refer 122302 HUSBY, JESSE Ck# 009070 12/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $84.50 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $84.50 Refer 122302 BERENT, BRIAN Ck# 009067 12/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $189.00 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $189.00 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $6.50 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6.50 Refer 122302 HART, PATRICK Ck# 009069 12/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $110.50 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $110.50 Refer 122302 WILLIAMS, JENNY Ck# 009077 12/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $65.00 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $65.00 Refer 122302 SCHWALBE, NICK Ck# 009074 12/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $136.50 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $136.50 Refer 122302 HAARSTAD, PAUL Ck# 009068 12/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $6.50 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6.50 Refer 122302 VANAUKEN, JEFF Ck#009076 12/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves 2002 EXPENSES $117.00 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $117.00 Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE $92.87 Invoice 122302 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $92.87 Refer 122302 PETTYCASH Ck#009072 12/23/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $49.11 Invoice 122302 PO 16750 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $49.11 Refer 122302 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Ck# 009071 12/23/2002 -115- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:06 AM Page 2 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MiX $67.14 Invoice 36973054 Transaction Date 12/23/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $67.14 Fund Summary BATCH Total $924.62 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $808.37 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $116.25 $924.62 Pre-Written Check $924.62 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $924.62 -116- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 1 Current Period: December 2002 Batch Name 122402SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $354,811.32 Posted Refer 122402 AMCON Ck#009078 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $4,521.81 Invoice 2446 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,521.81 Refer ~i22402 2bBiLEEFO~S Ck#009142 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous COUNCIL COOKIES $68.72 Invoice 120502 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $68.72 Refer 122402 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS Ck# 009093 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 3/4 MINUS (CL2) $2,049.62 Invoice 6149-B Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,049.62 Refer 122402 AMERCIANPLANNING ASSOCIATI Ck# 009079 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES $246.00 Invoice 082627 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $246.00 Refer 122402 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED Ck#009103 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract OVERAGE $143.47 Invoice 29999 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 11-02 COPIER MAINTENANCE $348.80 Invoice 29999 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $490.27 Refer 122402 LAKER NEWSPAPER Ck# 009146 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 12-07-02 ORD #17-2002 $417.90 Invoice 459 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 11-23-02 PROPOSED BUDGET $150.15 Invoice OX12 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $568.05 Refer 122402 XCEL ENERGY Ck# 009207 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 11-02 #0542-505-000-335 $4,805.97 Invoice Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,805.97 Refer 122402 E-Z RECYCLING Ck# 009111 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 12-02 CURBSIDE RECLCYING $7,700.00 Invoice 4533 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,700.00 Refer 122402 CUSTOMFIREAPPARATUS Ck# 009106 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair DOOR CHECK $28.90 Invoice 9326 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $28.90 Refer 122402 METRO FIRE Ck# 009153 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies HATS $828.18 Invoice 11564 -117- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02103 9:07 AM Page 2 Current Period: December 2002 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $628.18 Refer 122402 LAERDAL MEDICAL cORPORATIO Ck~ 009145 12/24i2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies BATTERY CHARGER $237.95 Invoice 1370785 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $237.95 Refer 122402 RIDGEVIEWMEDICAL, WACONIA Ck#009184 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies BACKBOARDS, STRAPS $699.28 Invoice 120202 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $699.28 Refer 122402 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVlC Ck# 009i40 12i24;2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR MACK LADDER $456.83 Invoice 17804 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $456.83 Refer 122402 ZEP MANUFAcTURiNG COMPANY Ck#009208 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies TOWELS $68.22 Invoice 47987189 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total 68 22Due Refer 122402 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INCO Ck# 009080 12/24/2002 $ Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. PAGER REPAIR $94.88 Invoice 51841 Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. PAGER REPAIR $56.92 Invoice 51840 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $151.80 Refer 122402 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Ck# 009122 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous 10-02 WATER $22.76 Invoice 103102 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous 11-02 WATER $23.26 Invoice 113002 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $46.02 Refer 122402 REyNoLDS WELDING suPPLY CO Ok# 009182 i2i24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AIR AND OXYGEN $22.07 Invoice R11021035 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $22.07 Ref; NCOM~ p~GiNG Ok# (}09154 i~/24/200:~ r i~2Z~02 MIN Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 12-02 PAGERS $107.11 Invoice 20233312022 Transaction Date 12/9/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $107.11 Refer 122402 MITTELSTAEDT, MARSHALL AND Ck# 009159 12/24/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22915 Middlestaedt #02-37 Utility E REIMBURSE ESCROW $15,000,00 Invoice 122402 Transaction Date 12/10/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 To[al $1 5,000.00 ~ 122402 WALDROiv, PAUL,41 ANDAS~OcIA C~# 009202 i2/24/2~02 ~Cash~ E 101-42400-300~~-~s THRU 11-13-02 TWO INSPECTiONS $200.00 Invoice 120902 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $200.00 -118- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 3 Refer 122402 DEBORD, JEANNEM. Ck# 009109 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-305 Medical and Dental Fees REIMBURSE EYE GLASSES $50.00 Invoice 121102 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 122402 HUNTER, DEAN Ck# 009134 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts SNOW PLOW $200.00 Invoice 120602 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 122402 XCEL ENERGY Ck# 009207 12/24/2002 Cash Payment 11-02 #0864-508-832 $75.40 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #0047-006-229 $164.43 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #0466-607-223 $19.01 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #2245-301-939 $718.96 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 ~:)864-508-832 $75.40 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #2184-407-147 $324.61 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #0217-606-329 $1,913.46 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #0542-505-000-001 $29.31 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #1914-601-425 $339.06 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #0018-802-634 $1,280.53 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #0864-508-832 $75.40 invoice 122402 Cash Payment 11-02 #0009-604-835 $249.26 Invoice 122402 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,264.83 Refer 122402 RELIANT ENERGY Ck# 009181 12/24/2002 E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities E 602-49450-381 Etectdc Utilities E 222-42260-381 Electdc Utilities E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-001-842-100 $540.23 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-001-972-603 $206.45 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-001-972-603 $154.84 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-001-853-000 $565.60 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-000-053-000 $185.86 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-001-095-800 $398.57 Invoice 122402 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-001-833-500 $135.93 Invoice 122402 -119- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 4 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 10-18-02 THRU 11-18-02 #543-001-972-603 $2§3.87 Invoice 122402 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,471.35 Refer 122402 PEDERSON, GREG Ck#009171 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs REIMBURSE PUBLIC SAFETY $46.14 PRESENTATION Invoice 121102 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $46.14 Refer 122~02 THURKBR~THERs ~HEVRO£E~ ok#0~gi~5 i2i24)2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery RETAINER $26.73 Invoice 48611 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SCREW, STRIKER, ETC $5.77 Invoice 48599 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $32,50 Refer 122402 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED Ck# 009180 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings MOTION SENSORS $380.05 Invoice 120502 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $380.05 Refer 122402 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Ck# 009166 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) WELDERS SUPPLIES $219.88 invoice 822329031 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair WELDERS SUPPLIES $8.53 Invoice 822329031 PO 17274 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair WELDERS SUPPLIES $81.97 Invoice 822329286 PO 17274 Cash Payment E 10%45200-409 Other Equipment Repair AXLE,BOLT,ECT $237.42 Invoice 07342309 PO 17268 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair WELDERS SUPPLIES $219.88 Invoice 07420089 PO 17271 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $767.68 Cash Payment E 281-45210-525 Other Capital Improveme RIP-RAP SHORELINE@TWiN/CRESCENT $34,970.00 Invoice 4587 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $34,970.00 Refer 122402 EQUlPMENTSUPPL¥, INCORPOR Ck#009115 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE $116.90 Invoice SMC258/125 Cash Payment E 609-49750-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE $11.63 Invoice SMC344/125 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $128.53 efe'r 12~402 FiNAL TOU~H S~icES, ii~1~; Ck# ~9i i~'i~i24/~0~2 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WINDOW CLEANING $543,15 Invoice 018265 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $543.15 -120- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 5 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 11-02 LOCATES $95.33 Invoice 2110536 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 11-02 LOCATES $95.32 Invoice 2110536 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $190.65 Refer 122402 ISLAND PARK SKELLY Ck# 009139 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ROTATE TIRES $21.00 Invoice 12076 Cash Payment $67.95 Invoice 12054 Cash Payment $288.81 Invoice 12066 Cash Payment $25.86 invoice 11979 Cash Payment $203.88 Invoice 12086 Cash Payment $822.47 Invoice 12062 Cash Payment $35.00 Invoice 12087 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,464.97 E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery THRUST ALIGN E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE REPAIR E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CHANGE OIL E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinew BATTERY E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ROTOR DUTY PADS E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MOUNT/BALANCE TIRES Ck# 009123 12/24/2002 Refer 122402 GOODYEAR TIRES Cash Payment E 101-42110-436 Towing Charges TIRES $93.76 Invoice 082358 PO 17529 Cash Payment E 101-42110-436 Towing Charges TIRES $797.00 Invoice 082350 PO 17529 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $890,76 Refer 122402 WILLIAMS TOWING Ck# 009205 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 06-10-02 TOW $138.45 Invoice 120202 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $138.45 Refer 122402 MINNESOTA HIGHWAYSAFETYA Ck# 009155 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 11-19-02 DRIVING CLASS TRAUX $196.00 Invoice 120902 PO 17521 Transaction Date 12112/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $196.00 Refer 122402 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Ck# 009099 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery DISC PADS $300.52 Invoice N1912 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $300.52 Refer 122402 UNIFORMS LIMITED Ck#009200 12/24/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves BADGE CLIPS,SLACKS,ETC $284.53 Invoice 152759 PO 17530 Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms BADGE CLIPS,SLACKS,ETC $695.00 Invoice 151182 PO 17525 Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms BADGE CLIPS,SLACKS,ETC $129.72 Invoice 151184 PO 17525 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,109.25 -121 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 6 Current Period: December 2002 Refer 122402 STREICHER'S Ck# 009189 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply STROBE TUBE $38.32 invoice 333418.1 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves PUSH BARS FOR SQUAD $574.94 Invoice 334750.1 PO 17541 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves CUFFS, CASES, ETC $466.84 invoice 332815.1 PO 17531 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply LIGHT BULBS $16.58 invoice 335637.1 PO 17273 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply LIGHT BULBS $16.58 Invoice 335637.1 PO 17273 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply LIGHT BULBS $16.58 Invoice 335637.1 PO 17273 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery LIGHT BAR/CONTROL BOX $274.34 Invoice 335868.1 PO 17535 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies AMMUNITION $2,335.17 invoice 333319.1 PO 17528 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply STROBE TUBE $38.31 invoice 333418.1 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,777.66 Refer 122402 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Ck# 009164 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells BALANCE DUE $63.45 Invoice 924573317-B Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $83.45 Refer 12~02 MEDTOxLABRA~RiES Cash Payment E 101-42110-305 Medical and Dental Fees PETZ,DRUGS TEST $30.00 Invoice 11200215956 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 122402 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM O ¢k# 00913712/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts CORE (3) $239.47 Invoice 10010962 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $239.47 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials FLANGE $172.24 Invoice 1-24803-0 PO 17497 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $172 24 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic INSPECT,TEST,CLEAN,ETC $960.00 invoice S1062609 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $960.00 Refer 122402 WATERTOWN PARTS CENTER .Ck# 009203 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL FILTERS, ETC invoice 333588 $64.46 Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL FILTERS, ETC $64.46 333588 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials BULB $14.00 Invoice 334725 -122- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 7 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials BULB $14,00 Invoice 334725 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply ACETYLENE $28.23 Invoice 335117 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL FILTERS, ETC $64.46 Invoice 333588 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials BULB $14.00 Invoice 334725 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $263.61 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISC STEEL $30.40 Invoice 42365 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SHOP SERVICE $6.84 invoice 42367 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials SHOP SERVICE $6.84 Invoice 42367 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISC STEEL $30.40 Invoice 42365 Cash Payment E 101.43100-230 Shop Materials MISC STEEL $30,40 invoice 42365 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair TUBE, CHANNEL $648.37 Invoice 42466 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials SHOP SERVICE $6.84 Invoice 42367 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $760.09 Refer 122402 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Ck#009126 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals CONTAINERS (8) $40.00 Invoice DM82707 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $40.00 Refer 122402 CARGIL SALTDIVlSION Ck#009097 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials BULK ICE CONTROL $966.37 Invoice 594313 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials BULK ICE CONTROL $1,056.95 Invoice 596682 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,023.32 Refer 122402 BRIAN'S TELEWSIONAND TANNIN Ck#009091 1212412002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials CABINET/REMOTE $81.88 Invoice 49545 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials CABiNET/REMOTE $81.88 Invoice 49545 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials CABINET/REMOTE $81.89 Invoice 49545 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total ' $245.65 Refer 122402 WlNKLER, BOB Ck# 009206 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials REDROCK AND CONCRETE SAND $2,382.67 Invoice 120302 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,382.67 -123- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 8 Current Period: December 2002 Refer 122402 MUELLER, WILLIAMAND SONS Ck#009160 12/24/2002 E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 11-20-02 BLACKTOP $1,072.09 Cash Payment Invoice 73699 Cash Payment Invoice 73615 Cash Payment Invoice 72939 E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 11-14-02 BLACKTOP $415.73 E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 11-06-02 BLACKTOP $276.88 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,764.70 Refer 122402 WIDMER, INCORPORATED Ck# 009204 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WATERMAIN BREAK $1,107.50 Invoice 5707 PO 17280 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract BREAK ARBOR AND DOVE $902.50 Invoice 5674 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract DISCONNECT SEWER AND WATER $142.50 Invoice 5677 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract DISCONNECT SEWER AND WATER $142.50 Invoice 5677 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,295.00 Refer 122402 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Ck# 009157 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples COLIFORM, MF - WATER $72.50 Invoice 146507 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $72.50 Refer 122402 ENEBAK CONSTRUCTION COMPA Ck# 009114 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic DITCH CLEANING LANGDON BAY $820.00 Invoice 120202 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total-- $820.00 Refer 122402 CARLSON TRACTORAND EQUiPM Ck# 009098 i2/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR SKID LOADER $8,909.55 Invoice 0102-203367 E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply COUPLING $145.69 PO 17279 E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts $0.00 Cash Payment Invoice 2008317 Cash Payment Invoice Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $9,055.24 Refer 122402 LAwsON PRODUCTS, iNC Ok# 009147 12124/2002' Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Invoice 0389463 PO 17277 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials invoice 0389463 PO 17277 Cash Payment Invoice 0389463 Cash Payment Invoice 0347883 Cash Payment invoice 0325559 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Refer 122402 SOS PRINTING E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials PO 17277 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $129.24 $129.24 $129.24 $315.41 $58.76 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $761.89 Ck# 009188 12/24/2007 -124- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 9 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies BUSINESS CARDS, WIDER $9.32 Invoice 64288 Cash Payment BUSINESS CARDS, WIDER $18.64 Invoice 64288 Cash Payment BUSINESS CARDS, WIDER $18.63 Invoice 64288 Cash Payment BUSINESS CARDS, WIDER $0.00 Invoice 64288 Cash Payment PAPER $19.00 Invoice 64324 Transaction Date Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $65.59 Refer 122402 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE Ck# 009120 12/24/2002 E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS $1,568.38 Cash Payment Invoice 57674 Cash Payment Invoice 57674 Cash Payment Invoice 57676 Transaction Date E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies E 101-41110-102 F T Empl Overtime E 101-42110-203 Printed Forms PO 17532 12/12/2002 Due 0 $1,568.37 E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS $276.36 E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS 11-02 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE 11-02 MISC PLANNING 11-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 11-02 TIF RELATED WORK 11-02 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,413.11 Re;er 'i~2402/~FRA ~T~E~ Ck# 009136 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts MAGNETIC LOCATOR $232.48 Invoice 022158 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts MAGNETIC LOCATOR $232.47 Invoice 022158 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts MAGNETIC LOCATOR $232,47 Invoice 022158 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $697.42 Refer 122402 HOME DEPOT/GECF Ck# 009133 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply POWER LIGHT $53.22 Invoice 000632/0071683 PO 17496 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply POWER LIGHT $53.22 Invoice 000632/0071683 PO 17496 Transaction Date 12/12/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $106.44 Refer 122402 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Ck# 009132 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs $2,481.52 Invoice 120502-B Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs $871.26 Invoice 120502-C Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 $460.00 Invoice 120502-D Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs $535.75 Invoice 120502-E Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs $262.85 invoice 120502-A Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,611.38 Refer 122402 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Ck# 009129 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs CD 1 $53.99 Invoice 346 -125- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 10 Current Period: December 2002 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $53,99 Refer 122402 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, Ck# 009101 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising THRU 11-19-02 CLASSIFIED $95,75 Invoice 20323 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.75 Refer 122402 PLUNKETT'S, INCORPORATED Ck# 009177 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic NOV,DEC 2002 $27.20 Invoice 693901 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $27.20 Refer i22402 NRG PROcEsSiNG soLLuT,ONS L Ck# 009i68 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery THRU 12-06-02 BRUSH SERVICE $3,798.85 Invoice 120602 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,798.85 Refer 122402 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Ck# 009113 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $1,650.00 Invoice 20261 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 11-02 MHR EXTENSION $300.00 invoice 20261 Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 FIRE STATION $375.00 Invoice 20262 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,325.00 Refer 122402 MADDEN, FRANKAND ASSOClAT Ck# 009148 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $366.30 Invoice 113002 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $366.30 Refer i22402 BUFFALOBiTbMiNOus Ck# 009094 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs REQUEST#3 $35,100.55 Invoice 3 Transaction Date 1211312002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $35, t00.55 Refer 122402 SUNRAMCONSTRUCTIONiNCOR Ck# 009192 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 REQUEST #2 $17,201.16 Invoice 113002 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $17,201.16 Refer 122402 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Ck# 009185 1212412002 E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 5000 ENCHANGED LANE $718.88 Cash Payment Invoice 4360 Cash Payment Invoice 4353 Cash Payment Invoice 4359 Transaction Date E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 5978 GUMWOOD TREES $905.25 E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 5016 ENCHANTED, 3 PTS $1,278.00 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2 902 13 Refer12402 FACKLER, JAMES Ck# 009116 12/24/2007 Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE $56.95 Invoice 120302 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $56.95 -126- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 11 Current Period: December 2002 Refer 122402 HOFF, KATIE Ck# 009131 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-210 Operating Supplies REIMBURSE PRINTER EXPENSE $199.13 Invoice 120502 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $199.13 Refer 122402 PINAULT TECHNICAL SERVICES Ck# 009174 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract COMPUTER REPAIRS $40.00 Invoice 120402 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $40.00 Refer 122402 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Ck# 009130 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training CARE WORKBOOK $28.50 invoice 00056970 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $28.50 Refer 122402 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Ck# 009122 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 WATER #5158500 $26.60 invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 WATER #5158500 $26.60 invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 WATER #5158502 $7.07 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 WATER #5158502 $7.07 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 WATER #5158501 $30.54 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 WATER #5158502 $7.06 Invoice 113002 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $104.94 Refer 122402 ANTHONYS FLORAL Ck# 009081 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies CLEANING SUPPLIES $80.00 Invoice 18253 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 122402 FITZCO, INCORPORATED Ck# 009118 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies PROPERTY BAGS $82.54 Invoice 17076 PO 17446 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $82.54 Refer 122402 A WD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA Ck# 009084 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 11-02 WATER #10213300 $30.28 Invoice 113002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 WATER #10213300 $30.27 Invoice 113002 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $60.55 Refer 122402 BMS INTEGRATED OFFICE TECHN Ck# 009090 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41310-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE $99.00 Invoice 130459 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $99.00 Refer 122402 TUSHIEMONTGOMERYARCHITE Ck# 009198 12/24/2002 -127- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 12 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings 11-02 NEW LIQUOR STORE $2,170.57 Invoice 16 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,170.57 Refer 122402 CHADWICK AND MERTZ Ck# 009100 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 11-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $6,081.00 invoice 113002 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,081.00 Refer 122402 BAYSIDE FLORAL Ck# 009085 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41115430 Miscellaneous SILK ARRANGEMENT $106.50 Invoice 17823 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $106.50 Refer 122402 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNT Ck# 009096 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41920-210 Operating Supplies ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS $236.64 Invoice 30195 Cash Payment E 101-41920-210 Operating Supplies W-2 FORMS, ENVELOPES $327.10 Invoice 30346 Cash Payment E 101-41920-210 Operating Supplies PAYROLL CHECKS $236.64 Invoice 30196 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $800.38 Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs FALL 2002 CITY CONTACT $700.00 Invoice 00040 Transaction Date 12/13/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $700.00 Refer 122402 NICCUM, DANIEL Ck# 009165 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 10142110-434 Conference & Training ADVANCE 01-02 TEXAS $161.00 Invoice 122402 Transaction Date 12/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $161.00 Refer 122402 BURKE, JAMI Ck# 009095 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110430 Miscellaneous REIMBURSE PHYSICAL FITNESS $65.00 Invoice 121102 Transaction Date 12/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $65.00 Refer 122402 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSO Ck~ Cash Payment E 601-49400.434 Conference & Training 02-21-023 CONFERENCE WIDMER $100.00 Invoice 122402 PO 17272 Cash Payment E 60149400-434 Conference & Training 02-21-023 CONFERENCE SKINNER $100.00 Invoice 122402 PO 17272 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training 02-21-023 CONFERENCE NELSON $100.00 Invoice 122402 PO 17272 Cash Payment E 602-49450434 Conference & Training 12-05-02 CONFERENCE (2) $100.00 Invoice 121102 PO 17284 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training 12-05-02 CONFERENCE (3) $150.00 Invoice 121102 PO 17284 Date 12/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $550.00 122402 GENERAL SPRINKLER CORPORAT Ck# 009121 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic SERVICE CALL $184.87 invoice 2759 -128- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 13 Transaction Date 12/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $184.87 Refer 122402 PIONEER RIM AND WHEEL COMP Ck# 009176 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair LONG SHACKLE LINKS $8.22 Invoice 1-503629 PO 17269 Transaction Date 12/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8.22 Refer 122402 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY Ck# 009196 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply LINER, ETC $154.65 invoice 221627 PO 17271 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply LINER, ETC $93.90 Invoice 220048 PO 17270 Transaction Date 12/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $248.55 Refer 122402 BRIMEYER GROUP, INC Ck# 009092 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs POLICE CHIEF SEARCJ $4,517.00 Invoice 120C Transaction Date 12/16/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,517.00 Refer 122402 BEDELL, STEVE Ck# 009086 12/24/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22911 5925 Ridgewood,Bedell,#02- CLOSE ESCROW 101-22911 $86.60 Invoice 122401 Transaction Date 12/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $86.60 Refer 122402 MUONIO, ROGER Ck#009161 12/24/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22847 5947 Ridgewood, Muonio, Su CLOSE ESCROW 101-22847 $760.50 Invoice 122402 Transaction Date 12/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $760.50 Refer 122402 TRUE VALUE, NAVAARRE Ck# 009197 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials TESTER $36.72 Invoice 111855 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply SINGLE CUT KEY $5.84 Invoice 112052 Transaction Date 12/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $42.56 Refer 122402 CREPEAUDOCKS Ck# 009105 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-220 Repair/Maint Supply POLE CAPS $692.25 Invoice 121102 PO 17253 Transaction Date 12/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $692.25 Refer 122402 KUSTOM SIGNALS Ck# 009144 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-409 Other Equipment Repair TRANSMITTER $4,726.33 Invoice 86565 Transaction Date 12/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,726.33 Refer 122402 RIDGEVIEWMEDICAL, MOUND Ck# 009183 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-305 Medical and Dental Fees 10/16/02 DRUG SCREENING $25.00 Invoice 120902 Cash Payment E 101-42110-306 Personal Testing EE EXAM PETZ $236.00 Invoice 120902 PO 17514 Cash Payment E 101-42110-306 Personal Testing EE VACINATION $121.00 Invoice 120902 Cash Payment E 101-42110-306 Personal Testing EE EXAM PETZ $92.00 Invoice 120902 PO 17514 -129- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 14 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical and Dental Fees 10/16/02 DRUG SCREENING $25.00 invoice 120902 Transaction Date 12/17/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $499.00 Refer 122402 BERGLUND, VIRGINIA Ck# 009088 12/24/2002 Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND WATER/SEWER $49.41 Invoice 121702 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $49.41 Refer 122402 MINNESOTA, STATE WEIGHTS/ME Ck# 009158 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic SCALES $400.00 Invoice 10305945 PO 17275 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $400.00 Refer 122402 IRRIGATIONENGINEERING, INC. Ck#009138 12/24/2002 Cash Payment G 101-22806 Park Dedication Fee WINTERIZE $325,00 Invoice 8119 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $325.00 Refe~ 12~402 NEWMAN SIGNS Ck# 009163 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGNS $17.13 Invoice TI-0097795 PO 17278 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $17.13 122402 HENNEPIN COUNTYINFORMATIO Ck# 009128 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 11-02 INTERNET SUPPORT $42.83 invoice 22117037 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $42.83 Refer 122402 SWANSON, AMY Ck# 009193 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE MEAL EXPENSE $41.19 Invoice 121302 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $41.19 Refer 122402 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Ck# 009199 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies HANGING FOLDERS $3.41 Invoice 366024-1 Cash Payment E 801-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.82 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E.602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.83 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies REFILL CALENDAR $4.04 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $104.62 invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies HANGING FOLDERS $6.81 Invoice 366024-1 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $6.54 Invoice 367677-0 Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.87 Invoice 367677-1 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.87 Invoice 367677-1 -130- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 15 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.87 Invoice 367677-1 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2,87 Invoice 367677-1 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.96 Invoice 367677-1 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.44 Invoice 367677-1 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $6,54 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies PLANNER $45.29 Invoice 367690-0 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies BINDERS $17.65 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies LAMP OVERHEAD $34,10 invoice 367698-0 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies PLANNER $34.08 Invoice 367683-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.44 Invoice 367677-1 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.77 Invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies PLANNER $68.16 Invoice 367683-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.96 Invoice 367677-1 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $25.55 Invoice 368559-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies HANGING FOLDERS $6.81 Invoice 366024-1 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.55 Invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.55 Invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.55 Invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.55 Invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.55 Invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies PLANNER $29.45 invoice 367772-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.85 invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $19.63 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.76 Invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $182.01 Invoice 368498-0 -131 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 ,AM Page 16 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $12.78 Invoice 368559-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $25.55 Invoice 368559-0 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies $29.71 Invoice 367911-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $68.15 Invoice 367683-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies $19.63 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies $19.63 invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $19.63 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $19.63 Invoice 367677-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $3.85 invoice 368383-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $2.87 Invoice 367677-1 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Total $925,18 Refer 122402 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY Ck# 009191 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WHEEL BOLTS $308.85 invoice 10008558 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $308.85 Refer 122402 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMEN Ck# 009178 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41500-430 Miscellaneous DELINQUENCY $10.00 Invoice 20141 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10.00 Refer 122402 ASSURED SECURITY Ck# 009083 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply CUT KEY $18,01 invoice 30240 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $18.01 Refer 122402 SHORTELLIOTTHENDRICKSON, I Ck#009186 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $30,343.98 Invoice 0094837 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $30,343,98 Refer 122402 CY'S UNIFORMS Ck# 009107 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies NAME TAGS $51.27 Invoice 14184 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $51.27 Refer 122402 V & S JEWELERS Ck# 009201 12i24i2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous PLAQUE FIREMAN OF THE YEAR $129.92 invoice 113002 ;tion Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $129.92 Refer 122402 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY Ck# 009208 12/24/2002 INK JET CARTRIDGE BINDERS PLANNER MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Marquette Bank Mou 10100 -132- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 17 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair CLEANING SUPPLIES $157.15 invoice 57986149 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $157.15 Refer 122402 STS CONSULTANTS Ck#009190 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs THRU 11-09-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE $4,880.75 Invoice 237918 Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs THRU 12-07-02 MAXWELL PROPERTY $3,987.21 Invoice 238755 Transaction Date 12/18/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8,867.96 Refer 122402 G & K SERVICES Ck# 009119 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 11-26-02 MATS $31.76 invoice 405141 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-10-02 MATS $30.42 Invoice 419079 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-26-02 UNIFORMS $15.44 invoice 405141 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-26-02 UNIFORMS $15.44 invoice 405141 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-26-02 UNIFORMS $15,44 Invoice 405141 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-10-02 UNIFORMS $16.46 invoice 419079 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-10-02 MATS $30.42 Invoice 419079 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-10-02 MATS $30,42 Invoice 419079 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 12-10-02 MATS $47.30 Invoice 419077 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-03-02 UNIFORMS $1.50 Invoice 412035 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-03-02 UNIFORMS $1.50 invoice 412035 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-10-02 UNIFORMS $16.46 Invoice 419079 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-10-02 UNIFORMS $16.46 invoice 419079 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 12-03-02 MATS $57.33 invoice 412035 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 12-03-02 MATS $57.33 Invoice 412035 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 11-26-02 MATS $31.76 Invoice 405141 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 12-10-02 MATS $27.67 Invoice 419075 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-03-02 UNIFORMS $1.50 Invoice 412035 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 12-10-02 MATS $105.17 Invoice 419078 -133- CITY OF MOUND Payments 0t/02/03 9:07 AM Page 18 Cash Payment $31.75 Invoice 405141 Cash Payment $52,80 invoice 419076 Cash Payment $57.34 Invoice 412035 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $691.67 Refer 122402 IKON OFFICE MACHinES Ck# 009135 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply TONER CARTRIDGE $96.32 Invoice 2354040A Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $96.32 Refer 122402 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI Ck# 009151 12/24/2002 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 11-26-02 MATS E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 12-10-02 MATS E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 12-03-02 MATS Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 UTILITY MAP UPDATE $220.05 invoice 42063-A Project 14103 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 UTILITY MAP UPDATE $220.05 invoice 42063-B Project 14103 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 11-02 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT $198.00 Invoice 42061 Project 13832 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT $880.10 invoice 42059 Project 13681 Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT $5,266.40 Invoice 42058 Project 13677 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 1708 DOVE DRAINAGE ISSUE $49.50 Invoice 42062 Project 13847 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 XCEL SUB-STATION $99.00 Invoice 42051 Project 13190 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 WATER MlSC ENGINEERING $24.75 Invoice 42044-A Project 08904 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 PLANNING MlSC ENGINEERING $940,50 Invoice 42041 Project 08901 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 11-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $1,976.90 Invoice 42057 Project 13646 Cash Payment E 402-43120-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 POST OFFICE DEMOLITION $1,868.80 Invoice 42046 Project 12379 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 WELL/PUMP HOUSE $1,379.50 Invoice 42055 Project 13313 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 2003 STREET REPLACEMENT $2,458.40 Invoice 42054 Project 13276 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 STREET MlSC ENGINEERING $161.20 Invoice 42043 Project 08903 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $2,622.00 Invoice 42052 Project 13215 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 DOWNTOWN TIF DISTRICT $148.50 Invoice 42048 Project 12534 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 MCES LIFT STATION $49.50 Invoice 42050 Project 13132 Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 11-02 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT $495.00 Invoice 42049 Project 12754 -134- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 19 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 CTY RD 15 RELOCATION $3,461.90 Invoice 42047 Project 12533 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 11-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $179.50 Invoice 42045 Project 12252 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 SEWER MISC ENGINNERING $24.75 Invoice 42044-B Project 08904 Cash Payment G 101-22899 Pastuck Natural Homes #02- 11-02 PASTUCK SUB-DIVISION $198.00 Invoice 42060 Project 13770 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 WESTEDGE WATERMAIN EXTENSION $80.60 invoice 42040 Project 07953 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 WESTEDGE MISC ENGINEERING $1,673.90 Invoice 42039 Project 07827 Cash Payment G 101-22860 2642 Commerce, Bristol Clas 11-02 MAHOGONY BAY CUP $99,00 Invoice 42056 Project 13495 Cash Payment E 281-45210-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 SHORELINE FOOTAGE $292,40 Invoice 42053 Project 13223 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $24,868.20 Refer 122402 SMITH, SARAH Ck# 009187 12/24/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $213.09 Invoice 121802 Cash Payment E 101-42400-305 Medical and Dental Fees 2002 EYE GLASS REIMBURSEMENT $50.00 Invoice 121802 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $263.09 Refer 122402 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Ck# 009082 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $66.60 Invoice DC235112 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $68.84 Invoice DC233708 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $87.76 Invoice DC234509 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $223.20 Refer 122402 BELLBOY CORPORATION Ck# 009087 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR ~ $2,864.64 Invoice 25217000 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,816.85 Invoice 25279400 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,681.49 Refer 122402 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Ck# 009102 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $307.04 Invoice 61275152 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $307.04 Refer 122402 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Ck# 009108 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $69.40 Invoice 201393 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,252.75 Invoice 201385 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,267.60 Invoice 200521 -135- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 20 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $629.35 Invoice 202112 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,219.10 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $12.90 Invoice 335018 Cash Payment BEER $2,751.25 Invoice 335017 Cash Payment BEER $2,559.10 Invoice 329301 Cash Payment BEER $107.00 Invoice 330647 Cash Payment BEER $2,331.30 Invoice 332166 Cash Payment BEER $68.00 Invoice 333509 Cash Payment BEER $800.00 Invoice 334325 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $8,629.55 122402 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Ck# 009125 12/24/2002 Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,101,57 Invoice 642515 Cash Payment LIQUOR $3,241.70 Invoice 642513 Cash Payment WINE $0,00 Invoice 638239 Cash Payment WINE $59.80 Invoice 642514 Cash Payment WINE $27.67 Invoice 639442 Cash Payment LIQUOR $38.72 Invoice 642372 Cash Payment WINE $1,335.04 Invoice 638543 Cash Payment WINE $119.00 Invoice 642205 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5 923.50 Refer 122402 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Ck# 009141 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE E 609.49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609~49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750~253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 1496094 $62.25 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $310.52 Invoice 1492954 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,703.10 Invoice 1492953 Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT--WINE -$5.50 209578 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $293.10 Invoice 1492956 -136- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 21 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$5.20 Invoice 209577 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $900.75 Invoice 1496092 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $684.40 Invoice 1492955 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $421.40 Invoice 1496093 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $69.00 Invoice 1496095 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale $0.00 Invoice Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$248.27 invoice 209448 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $311.67 invoice 1492952 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $39.65 Invoice 1496096 Transaction Date 12/19/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,536.67 Refer 122402 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Ck# 009149 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,181.60 Invoice 489244 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $59.10 Invoice 484602 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,336.60 Invoice 484601 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,219.37 Invoice 486977 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,796.67 Refer 122402 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Ck# 009150 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 12-02-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $32.00 Invoice 11909 Cash Payment E 609-49750~265 Freight 12-05-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $176.80 Invoice 11930 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 12-09-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $23.20 Invoice 11942 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 12-12-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $113.70 Invoice 11965 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $345.70 Refer 122402 PAUSTISAND SONS WINE COMPA Ck# 009170 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $875.00 Invoice 0205861-1N Cash Payment E 609~49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,031.41 Invoice 0204810-1N Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,906.41 Refer 122402 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Ck#009172 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $44.58 Invoice 37543569 -137- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 22 Current Period: December 2002 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $44.58 Refer 122402 pHILLIpS w/NEAND SpiRiTS /NC Ck# 0°9'173 i2/24/2°02 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $816,75 Invoice 901905 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,090.20 Invoice 899512 Cash,Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE -$4.89 Invoice 3270464 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,568.05 Invoice 899511 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $252.15 Invoice 901904 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,722.26 Refer 122402 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Ck# 009175 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $484.77 Invoice 5739 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $803.78 Invoice 6197 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARE'FrES $952.77 Invoice 6675 ITransaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,241.32 Refer 122402 QUALITY WlNEAND SPIRITS Ck# 009179 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $49.34 Invoice 198536-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,893.12 Invoice 198892-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,382.09 Invoice 198865-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR Invoice 197665-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$5.52 Invoice 192616-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $133.89 Invoice 202337-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$10.06 Invoice 200726-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,071.60 Invoice 199607-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $28.34 Invoice 202076-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,283.61 Invoice 202092-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $289.03 Invoice 202569-00 {~Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $9 109.45 Cash Payment E 609-4g7§0-252 Beer For Resale BEER $267.00 Invoice 240739 -138- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 23 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $38.55 Invoice 282476 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,386.50 Invoice 282477 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $183.03 Invoice 283153 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,634.90 Invoice 281796 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$265.00 Invoice 267989-C Cash Payment E 609~49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $68.00 Invoice 241306 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $25.70 Invoice 281795 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,452.75 Invoice 283154 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10,791.43 Refer 122402 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Ck# 009143 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs $197.00 Invoice 54495-A2 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs $257.40 Invoice 54495-B Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs $81.00 Invoice 54495~C Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development $135.80 Invoice 54495-D Cash Payment E 354-43140-300 Professional Srvs -$575,00 Invoice Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs $114.50 Invoice 54495-A1 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $210.70 Refer 122402 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Ck# 009143 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 WATER MISC ISSUES Invoice 54496-13b Cash Payment G 101-22891 Kells Lane Vacation, J. Paul 11-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION Invoice 54496-C 1 Cash Payment G 601-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings Invoice 54496-B Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54496-A Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54496-E Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 Invoice 54496-11 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54496-J2 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54496-F2 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS BILLABLE 11-02 REDEVEL PROJECT AREA #1 11-02 POST OFFICE RELOCATION 11-02 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT 11-02 DEFICIENCE AGREEMENT TIF 11-02 HRA MEETING 11~02 NEW LIQUOR STORE 11-02 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT 11-02 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY 11-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 11-02 PLANNING MISC ISSUES 11-02 EXECUTIVE $19.89 $45.00 $168.00 $3,915.67 $1,061.30 $47.67 $1,865.96 $918,00 -139- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 24 Current Period: December 2002 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 SEWER MISC ISSUES invoice 54496-13c Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 STREETS MISC ISSUES Invoice 54496-13a Cash Payment G 101-22895 Kells Lane Vacation Jeff Paul 11-02 KELLS ROAD VACATION invoice 54496-C2 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54495-12 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs invoice 54496-D Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs invoice 54496-H Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 Invoice 54496-G3 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54496-G2 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 54496-G1 Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs invoice 54496-F1 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 AQUILINA ISSUES Invoice 54496-J1 Transaction Date 12/20/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 122402 NATIONAL WATERWORKS Ck# 009162 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts SPLICE CONNECTORS Invoice 8987354 PO 17276 Transaction Date 12/23/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Refer 122402 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPP Ck# 009167 12/24/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply METER Invoice 3150229 Transaction Date 12/23/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 11-02 WESTEDGE BLVD 11-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE 11-02 PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES 11-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT 11-02 UNDER VOTE ISSUES 11-02 ADMINISTRATIVE 11-02 FIRE CONTRACT ISSUES $19.88 $19.89 $45.00 $1,601.67 $330.60 $1,013.70 $108.00 $36.O0 $295.70 $648.00 $183.96 Total $12,343.89 $55.73 Total $55.73 $1,009.34 Total $1,009.34 -140- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page 25 Current Period: December 2002 Fund Summary BATCH Total $354,811.32 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 354 Commerce Place Tif 1-1 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 10100 Ma~ueEe Bank Mound $114,976.03 $4,755.35 $36,213.37 ($575.00) $42,322.27 $1,868.80 $12,630.74 $35,286.93 $13,923.06 $4,928.72 $69,431.80 $7,700.00 $11,347.25 $354,811.32 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $354,811.32 $o.oo $354,811.32 -141 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/02/03 9:07 AM Page I Current Period: December 2002 Batch Name 123002SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $171.37 Posted Refer 123002 PEDERSON, GREG Ck# 009922 12/30/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-331 Use of personal auto REIMBURSE 2002 MILEAGE $86.94 Invoice 123002 Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING MEETING $34.86 Invoice 123002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE 04-05-02 ROCHESTER FIRE $47.17 SCHOOL 12/30/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total invoice 123002 Transaction Date $168.97 Refer 123002 WILLIAMS, RICK Ck# 009923 12/30/2002 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE 08-22-02 EXPENSE $2.40 Invoice 123002 Transaction Date 12/30/2002 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2.40 Fund Summary BATCH Total $171.37 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $136.51 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG $34.86 $171.37 Pre-Written Check $171.37 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $171.37 -142- JANUARY 14, 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 123102SUE $301,160.36 DEC 010203SUE $68,356.04 JAN 010803SUE $5,700.00 JAN 011403SUE $9,451.26 JAN TOTAL $384,667.66 -143- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/0g/03 t0:2g AM Page 1 Current Period: Closing 2002 Batch Name 123102SUE User Dollar Amt $301,160.36 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $301,160.36 $0.00 In Balance Refer 123102 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INCORPOR AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SQUAD GRAPHICS Invoice 5437 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 $251.20 Total $251.20 AP Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $24,955.55 invoice 2449 Transaction Date 1/6/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $24,955.55 Refer 123102 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE AP Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $33.32 Invoice DC236107 AP Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $59.32 Invoice DC235711 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $92.64 Refer 123102 AT&T Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 952-250-0429 $34.45 ,qvoice 122602 AP Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 612-810-4029 $35.24 Invoice 122602 AP Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells RESUME SERVICE $25.00 Invoice 122602 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $94.69 Refer 123102 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY AP Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Se~ic 12-1 1-02 SERVICE CALL $1,607.15 Invoice 14145S Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,607.15 AP Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous REIMBURSE PHYSICAL FITNESS $60.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $60.00 Refer 123102 BELLBOY CORPORA TION AP Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE GLASSES $74.00 Invoice 36561100 AP Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R BAGS, SHOT GLASSES $112.27 Invoice 36492100 AP Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R BAGS $300.62 Invoice 36491800 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,119.20 Invoice 25420100 .P E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,102.73 25353500 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $8,708.82 Refer 123102 BENDICKSON, WES -144- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 2 AP Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic DIRT $60.00 Invoice 1019 PO 17287 AP Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic DIRT $240.00 Invoice 1017 PO 17287 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $300.00 Refer 123102 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY AP Payment COFFEE $17.50 Invoice 323766 AP Payment COFFEE $8.75 Invoice 323766 AP Payment COFFEE $43.75 Invoice 323766 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $70.00 Refer 123102 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC. E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE 4845 $46.03 MANCHESTER AP Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment ~nvoice 123102 ,P Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 Transaction Date E 101-42400-431 Meeting Expense E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense $31.66 E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE P/W BLDG $31.66 E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE PNV BLDG $31.67 E 602-49450~384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE PNV BLDG $17.76 E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE LIQUOR STORE $2O.39 E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE MAIN STREET $67,01 E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $246.18 Refer 123102 BRAND NETWORKING AP Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $1,126.77 Invoice 15550 PO 17547 AP Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $113.95 Invoice 15549 PO 17547 AP Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $383.34 Invoice 15548 PO 17547 AP Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $670.93 Invoice 15547 PO 17547 Transaction Date 1/6/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2,294.99 Refer 123102 BUSINARO, GINO AP Payment E 101-41500-431 Meeting Expense REIMBURSE MILEAGE $15.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date' 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $15.00 '~efer 123102 CARGIL SALT DIVISION P Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Material~ SALT $281.45 Invoice 619344 -145- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09(03 10:29 AM Page 3 Current Period: Closing 2002 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $281.45 Refer 123102 CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPM AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR SKID LOADER $809.55 Invoice 0102-2033367 AP Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply COUPLING $145.69 Invoice 2008317 AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR HYDRAULIC LEAK $147.66 Invoice 0201 203523 AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR SKID STEER LOADER $817.19 Invoice 0101 117227 Transaction Date 1/6/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,920.09 Refer 123102 CHADWICK AND MERTZ AP Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 12-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $6,099.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $6 099 00 Refer 123102 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, AP Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising PT EMPLOYMENT AD $22.35 Invoice 20323-B Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Tota $22 35 ~efer 123102 COCA COLA BOTTL/NG-MIDWEST AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $479.56 Invoice 60079157 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $479.56 Refer 123102 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$0.30 Invoice 201393-B AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $33.80 Invoice 204291 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,204.60 Invoice 204282 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,343.60 Invoice 203516 AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $16.90 Invoice 202897 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $712.05 Invoice 202896 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3 310.65 R;f~r i'23i02 D~)B~S~Ns~i~ND 'S~)N~i i~5~ ~ " AP Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic STORM SEWER INLET $2,750.00 Invoice 1902 AP Payment E 455-46381-300 Professional Srvs 12-15-20 REQUEST #3 $24,492.04 Invoice 1902 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $27,242.04 ?efer 123102 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Ap Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $12.90 Invoice 343536 -146- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 4 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment BEER $1,264.60 Invoice 343535 AP Payment BEER $25.80 Invoice 341503 AP Payment BEER $4,948.15 Invoice 341502 AP Payment BEER $32.50 Invoice 339197 AP Payment BEER $1,949.15 Invoice 339196 AP Payment BEER $29.00 invoice 339195 AP Payment BEER $494.00 invoice 338655 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $8,756.10 Refer 123102 EMERGENCYAPPARATUS MAINT AP Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR ENGINE #11 $85.05 Invoice 13141 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $85.05 Refer 123102 EXTREME BEVERAGE \P Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R LIQUOR $32.00 Invoice 94440 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $32.00 Refer 123102 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMP AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $168.00 Invoice 1984 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $168,00 Refer 123102 G & K SERVICES AP Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-31-02 UNIFORMS $30,42 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 439965 AP Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-31-02 UNIFORMS $30.42 Invoice 439965 AP Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-31-02 UNIFORMS $30.43 Invoice 439965 AP Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 12-31-01 MATS $28.41 Invoice 439965 AP Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 12-31-02 MATS $28.41 Invoice 439965 AP Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 12-31-02 MATS $28.41 Invoice 439965 AP Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 12-24-02 MATS $13.98 Invoice 433070 AP Payment E 101-41910-460.Janitorial Services 12-24-02 MATS $84.34 Invoice 433072 ~P Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 12-24-02 MATS $27.67 ,nvoice 433069 AP Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-17-02 UNIFORMS $31.76 Invoice 426090 -147- CITY OF MOUND Payments 0~/09/03 10:29 AM Page 5 AP Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12-17-02 UNIFORMS $31.76 Invoice 426090 AP Payment 12-17-02 UNIFORMS $31.75 Invoice 426090 AP Payment 12-17-02 MATS $15.44 invoice 426090 AP Payment 12-17-02 MATS $15.44 Invoice 426090 AP Payment 12-17-02 MATS $15.44 Invoice 426090 AP Payment 12-24-02 UNIFORMS $31.42 Invoice 433073 AP Payment 12-24-02 UNIFORMS $31.42 Invoice 433073 AP Payment 12-24-02 UNIFORMS $31.41 Invoice 433073 AP Payment 12-24-02 MATS $17.73 Invoice 433073 AP Payment 12-24-02 MATS $17.73 Invoice 433073 AP Payment 12-24-02 MATS $17.73 ~voice 433073 l'ransaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $591.52 Refer 123102 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450~218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR AUTO $2,476.65 Invoice 58083 AP Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR AUTO $1,843.58 Invoice 58083 AP Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR AUTO $1,843.57 Invoice 58083 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $6,163.80 Refer 123102 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD AP Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 12-02 WATER #5158501 $22.80 Invoice 123102 AP Payment 12-02 WATER #32345800 $34.76 Invoice 123102 AP Payment 12-02 WATER #5158500 $35.20 Invoice 123102 AP Payment 12-02 WATER #5158500 $35.10 Invoice 123102 AP Payment 12-02 WATER #5158502 $4.20 Invoice 123102 AP Payment 12-02 WATER #5158502 $4.20 Invoice 123102 AP Payment 12-02 WATER #5158502 $4.20 ~nvoice 123102 ,:ansacUon Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payabte 20200 Total $140.46 Refer 123102 GRADY, DANIEL -148- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 6 AP Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $150.00 Refer 123102 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY AP Payment E 609"49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$2,125.00 Invoice 604003 AP Payment LIQUOR $253.34 Invoice 653441 AP Payment WINE $205.25 Invoice 653262 AP Payment WiNE $3,249.66 Invoice 646396 AP Payment LIQUOR $455.34 Invoice 646397 AP Payment WINE $174.75 Invoice 650053 Transaction Date 11812003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2,213.34 Refer 123102 HANSON, KANDIS E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells REIMBURSE DSL LINE $149.85 AP Payment Invoice 110702 P Payment invoice 110702 AP Payment Invoice 110702 Transaction Date E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale $10.80 E 101-41310-331 Use of personal auto REIMBURSE MILEAGE REIMBURSE MEAL $4.03 E 101"41310-431 Meeting Expense 1/6/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $164.68 Refer 123102 HEI'I'Z, DONALD AP Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $150.00 Refer 123102 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A AP Payment E 101-41600"450 Board of Prisoners 11-02 BOOKING FEE $1,302.12 Invoice 122402 AP Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals 2002 RADIO LEASE $2,220.43 Invoice 122402 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3,522.55 Refer 123102 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R AP Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 11-02 ROOM AND BOARD $467.00 Invoice 000827 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $467.00 Refer 123102 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER AP Payment E 101-41550-440 Other Contractual Servic 2003 TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICES $706.71 Invoice 12310 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $706.71 efer 123102 HOFF, KATIE AP Payment E 281-45210-331 Use of personal auto REIMBURSE MILEAGE 2002 $62.78 Invoice 123102 -149- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 Afvl Page 7 Current Period: Closing 2002 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $62.78 Refer 123102 HOME DEPOT/GECF AP Payment E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies SHEETING, TAPE, ETC $64.55 Invoice 000751/9021182 PO 17639 AP Payment E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies SHEETING, TAPE, ETC $64.55 Invoice 000751/9021182 PO 17639 AP Payment E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies SHEETING, TAPE, ETC $64.54 Invoice 000751/9021182 PO 17639 AP Payment E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies SHEETING, TAPE ETC $61.98 Invoice 4012058 PO 17267 AP Payment E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies SHEETING, TAPE ETC $61.98 Invoice 4012058 PO 17267 AP Payment E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies SHEETING, TAPE ETC $61.98 Invoice 4012058 PO 17267 AP Payment E 281-45210-220 Repair/Maint Supply SAFETY FENCE, ETC $119.42 Invoice 5111875 AP Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials PRIMER $17.30 Invoice 000259/4041785 AP Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials PRIMER $17.30 Invoice 000259/4041785 AP Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials PRIMER $17.29 invoice 000259/4041785 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $550 89 Refer 123102 IKON OFFICE MACHINES ' AP Payment E Invoice 23537298 AP Payment E Invoice 23537299 AP Payment E Invoice 23537300 AP Payment E Invoice 23537298 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 101-41110-202 Duplicating and copying 09-24-02 THRU 10-24-02 MAINTENANCE COPIER $125.17 10-24-02 THRU 11-24-02 MAINTENANCE COPIER $125.17 11-24-02 THRU 12-24-02 MAINTENANCE COPIER $125.17 TONER FOR FAX $96.22 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $471 73 ~efe'r i~31'02 i~F~T~C~ AP Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts GAS MONITOR $244.74 Invoice 022358 Transaction Date 11812003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Tota $244 74 AP Payment E 101-42400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERY $102.68 Invoice 12352 AP Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery GASKET AND VALVE COVER $99.73 Invoice 12071 Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Tota $202 41 -150- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 8 AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies BUNKER BOOTS $910.39 invoice 094860 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $910.39 Refer 123102 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC AP Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR GENERATOR $391.17 Invoice 17943 AP Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR POWER STEERING $134.82 Invoice 17939 AP Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR LADDER TRUCK $896.04 Invoice 17933 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,422,03 Refer 123102 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$41.10 Invoice 211488 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $86.70 Invoice 1502031 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $761.30 Invoice 1502030 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $659.05 Invoice 1502029 ~,P Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,799.05 Invoice 1502028 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,491.00 Invoice 1502027 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $26.00 Invoice 1499321 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $524.40 Invoice 1499320 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $346.50 Invoice 1499319 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,626.80 invoice 1499318 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,207.95 Invoice 1499317 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,569,50 Invoice 1499316 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $13,057.15 Refer 123102 JUBILEE FOODS AP Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous LIQUOR STORE CHRISTMAS PARTY $29.18 Invoice 122402 AP Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous COUNCIL COOKIES $6.77 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs 11-14-02 POLICE INTERVIEWS $78.39 Invoice 111402 AP Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs 11-13-02 POLICE INTERVEIWS $69.41 'nvoice 111302 ,~P Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs 11-15-02 POLICE INTERVIEWS $85.75 Invoice 111502 -151 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 0`1/09/03 '10:29 AM Page 9 Transaction Date 11312003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $269.50 Refer 123102 LAKER NEWSPAPER AP Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 12-28-02 CSAH IMPROVEMENTS $55.00 Invoice 471 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $55.00 Refer 123102 LUBE TECH, INCORPORATED E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts FUEL SUPPLEMENT $37.35 AP Payment Invoice 910724 AP Payment invoice 910724 AP Payment Invoice 910724 E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts FUEL SUPPLEMENT $37.35 E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts FUEL SUPPLEMENT $37.34 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $112.04 Refer 123102 MADDEN, FRANK AND ASSOCIAT AP Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $198.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $198.00 Refer 123102 MARK VIIDISTRIBUTOR AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $45.00 nvoice 494374 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,095.85 Invoice 494373 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,702.05 invoice 491828 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $34.90 Invoice 491829 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $5,877.80 Refer 123102 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY AP Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 12-16-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $36.80 Invoice 11978 AP Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 12-19-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $251.50 Invoice 12252 AP Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 12-27-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $157.30 Invoice 12282 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $445.60 R~;r i~3i02 MA~R-~EDi'OA~ AP Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies WHEEL FOR OXYGEN REGULATOR $19.53 Invoice CO 659804 PO 17546 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $19.53 R~fer 123i02 ~CC°MB~ FR~K ~ ~S~i AP Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 PLANNING/ZONING $148.50 Invoice 42221 Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $148.50 AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FOAM $393.75 Invoice 111587 -152- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 10 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies CREDIT SHIELDS -$64,00 invoice 096645 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $329.75 Refer 123102 METRO FIRE AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies LEATHER FRONT $71.18 Invoice 11862 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $71.18 Refer 123102 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR AP Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 12-02 SAC CHARGES $2,376.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/6/2003 Due 12131/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2 376.00 Refer 123102 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO AP Payment Invoice 122602 AP Payment Invoice 122602 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 05-25-02 THRU 12-17-02 MAXWELL PROPERTY $660.00 05-25-02 THRU 12-17~02 KOEHLERS ADDITION $480.00 ~P Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples COLIFORM, MF - WATER $72.50 Invoice 150807 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total .................... $72.50 Refer 123102 MORAN, ALLAN AND LINDA AP Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs REIMBURSE APPRAISAL FEE $500.00 Invoice 20055 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 1213112002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $500.00 Refer 123102 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries AP Payment Invoice 113002 AP Payment Invoice 113002 AP Payment Invoice 113002 Transaction Date E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 11-02 SALARIES 11-02 DRILLS 11-02 MAINTENANCE $5,134.50 $650.00 $1,250.00 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $7,034.50 Refer 123102 MOUND, CI'I'¥ OF AP Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities 11-02 WATER/SEWER $18.81 invoice 121802 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $18.81 Refer 123102 MURRAY, WILLIAM AP Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous REIMBURSE PHY $49.99 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $49.99 ,efer 123102 MYERS, TONY -153- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01109103 10:29 AM Page 11 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 222.42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE EXPENSE 09-02 MN STATE $64.96 FIRE SCHOOL Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $64.96 Refer 123102 NATIONAL WATERWORKS AP Payment E 60%49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply CLAMPS $534.47 Invoice 9021356 AP Payment E 601.49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply CLAMPS $89.66 Invoice 9020006 AP Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply TRANSCEIVER UNIT $2,755.78 Invoice 9001470 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3 379.91 Refer i23i02 ~EL~N, 3~CE AP Payment E 101.41500-331 Use of personal auto REIMBURSE MILEAGE $118.62 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $118.62 Refer 123102 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (P/W) AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 ~P Payment Invoice 101802 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101.43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602.49450-321 Telephone & Cells 09-18-02 THRU 10-19-02 #23 KESNTER, AL 09-18-02 THRU 10-19-02 #20 GRADY, DAN 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 #22 HEITZ, DON 09-18~02 THRU 10-18~02 #18 HARDINA, DAMON 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 #17 POUNDER, CHRIS 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 #16 JOHNSON, TIM 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 #19 KIVISTO, SCOTT 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 #21 HEITZ, FRANK 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6740 BERENT, BRIAN 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6974 TAFFE, JOHN 09-18-02 THRU 10~18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG $34.17 $39.09 $34.17 $34.17 $34.17 $34.17 $35.63 $34.17 $22.41 $12.99 $22.83 $22.83 $22.83 -154- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 12 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6812 FACKLER, $79.72 Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 ~,P Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 101802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 \P Payment Invoice 111802 E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400~321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells JIM 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6813 HOFF, KATIE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6814 RAHN, JODI 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, JOYCE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, JOYCE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, JOYCE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 221-8385 SWARTZER, BRIAN 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 292-1182 GEISE, LEE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 282-3599 ANDERSON, MIKE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 282-5889 SIMONEAU, MATT 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 363-5883 NORLANDER, JILL 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE 09-18-02 THRU 10-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #23 KESTNER, AL 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #20 GRADY, DAN 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #22 HEITZ, DON 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #18 HARDINA, DAMON 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #17 POUNDER, CHRIS $45.78 $34.83 $9.07 $9.07 $9.07 $35.21 $35.21 $35.21 $36.60 $29.67 $3.77 $9.53 $9.53 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 -155- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 13 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment ']voice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 * P Payment Invoice 111802 E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Ceils E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #16 JOHNSON, TIM 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #19 KIVISTO, SCOTT 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 #21 HEITZ, FRANK 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6740 BERENT, BRIAN 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6974 TAFFE, JOHN 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 212-6811 SKINNER, GREG 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6812 FACKLER, JIM 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6813 HOFF, KATIE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6814 RAHN, JODI 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, JOYCE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, JOYCE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, JOYCE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 221-8385 SWARTZER, BRIAN 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 292-1182 GEISE, LEE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 282-3599 ANDERSON, MIKE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 282-5889 SIMONEAU, MATT 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 363-5883 NORLANDER, JILL $38.17 $38,17 $38.17 $25.02 $21.05 $24.49 $24.49 $24.49 $76.72 $45.83 $35.33 $13.07 $13,07 $13.07 $39.21 $39.21 $39.21 $72.00 $33.67 -156- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 14 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, $7.07 Invoice 11 t802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 111802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Ceils E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Ceils DENICE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, DENICE 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 #23 KESTNER, AL 11-19-02 THRU 12~18-02 #20 GRADY, DAN 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 #22 HEITZ, DON 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 #18 HARDINA, DAMON 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 #17 POUNDER, CHRIS 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 #16 JOHNSON, TIM 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 #19 KIVISTO, SCOTT 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 #21 HEITZ, FRANK 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6740 BERENT, BRIAN 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6974 TAFFE, JOHN 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6811 SKINNER, GREG 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6812 FACKLER, JIM 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6813 HOFF, KATIE 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6814 RAHN, JODI 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, JOYCE $14.13 $14.13 $38.17 $38,17 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 $38.17 $18.88 $16.24 $24.93 $24.93 $24,93 $76.72 $45.83 $35.33 $13.07 -157- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 15 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, $13.07 JOYCE Invoice 121802 AP Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-6822 NELSON, $13.07 JOYCE invoice 121802 AP Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 221-8385 $39.21 SWARTZER, BRIAN Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 292-1182 GEISE, LEE $39.21 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 282-3599 ANDERSON, MIKE $39.21 Invoice 121802 AP Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 282-5889 $73.48 SIMONEAU, MATT Invoice 121802 AP Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 363-5883 $33.67 NORLANDER, JILL Invoice 121802 AP Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, $7.27 DENICE Invoice 121802 Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, $14.03 DENICE Invoice 121802 AP Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 292-1375 WIDMER, $14.03 DENICE Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 AP Payment Invoice 121802 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 NEW EQUIPMENT $143.57 E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells CREDIT 282-5889 -$1,524.38 Transaction Date 1/6/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,138.18 Refer 123102 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl AP Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 11-19-02 THRU 12-18-02 CELL PHONE $419.21 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $419.21 Refer 123102 NICCUM, DANIEL AP Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training ADVANCE 01-02 TEXAS $42.00 Invoice 122402-B Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $42.00 Refer 123102 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN AP Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply CREDIT NOZZLE, WIRE -$8.53 Invoice 07468792 AP Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA WINCH $1,064.99 Invoice 07508057 PO 17464 iAP Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply CONTACT TIP AND WIRE $81.97 Invoice 07440653 PO 17274 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1 138.43 -158- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 16 Current Period: Closing 2002 Refer 123102 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPP AP Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts METERS $39.27 Invoice 3153038 AP Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts METERS $286.58 Invoice 3152987 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $325.85 Refer 123102 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $95.94 Invoice 37543662 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $95.94 Refer 123102 PERKINS, DAVE CONTRACTING, I AP Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 12-15-02 PAYMENT REQUEST #3 $37,922.36 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $37,922.36 Refer 123102 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$4.04 Invoice 2171720 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$198.45 Invoice 3271719 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,362.85 Invoice 906421 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,893.75 Invoice 906420 AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $160.00 Invoice 904400 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,252.10 Invoice 904399 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,309.75 Invoice 904398 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $8,775.96 Refer 123102 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING AP Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $585.52 Invoice 7069 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $585.52 Refer 123102 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 209037-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 208504-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 207960-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 207650-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 207641-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR invoice 207637-00 CREDIT-LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR -$48.54 $437.16 $302.72 $1,389.82 $82.87 $529.57 -159- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 17 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 206461-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 205303-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 204124-00 AP Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 205036-00 $93.13 $2,425.95 $3,578.59 $64.2O Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $8,855.47 Refer 123102 RANDY'SSANITATATION AP Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 12-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $114.54 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $114.54 Refer 123102 RILEY, DETTMANN, AND KELSEY AP Payment E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs THRU 12-30-02 JOB CONTENT $140.50 Invoice 6527 AP Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs THRU 12-30-02 JOB CONTENT $140.50 invoice 6527 AP Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs THRU 12-30-02 JOB CONTENT $140.50 Invoice 6527 AP Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs THRU 12-30-02 JOB CONTENT $140.50 Invoice 6527 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $562.00 Refer 123102 ROBERTS, COLLETTE AP Payment E 101-41500-331 Use of personal auto REIMBURSE MILEAGE $45.99 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $45.99 Refer 123102 SCHARBER AND SONS AP Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair BLADE $127.67 Invoice 02 2030679 AP Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair BLADE $14.17 Invoice 02 203067-B Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total ~1.~ 1 84 AP Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services CAN LINERS $32.35 Invoice 13418 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $32.35 Refer 123102 SKINNER, GREG AP Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $14.66 Invoice 121902 AP Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $14.66 Invoice 121902 AP Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $14.66 Invoice 121902 on Date 1/6/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $43.98 -160- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 18 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 101-42110-203 Printed Forms ICR FORMS $98.73 Invoice 64347 PO 17545 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $98.73 Refer 123102 SPEEDWA'Y SUPERAMERICA (FIR AP Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 12-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $42.32 Invoice 122602 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/13/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $42.32 Refer 123102 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (P/W E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 12-24-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $723.50 AP Payment invoice 122402 AP Payment invoice 122402 AP Payment invoice 122402 Transaction Date E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 12-24-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $512.86 E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 12-24-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $167.07 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,403.43 Refer 123102 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (POL AP Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 11-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,178.18 Invoice 112602 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,178.18 Refer 123102 STREICHER'S AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CLEANING SOLUTION $42.55 Invoice 333319.2 AP Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves PUSH BUMPERS $100.00 Invoice 336604.1 PO 17541 AP Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves PUSH BUMPERS $100.00 Invoice 339000.1 PO 17541 AP Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts STINGER, FLASHLIGHT, ETC $94.68 Invoice 336555.1 PO 17282 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $337.23 Refer 123102 STS CONSULTANTS AP Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs THRU 12-07-02 BALBOA LAND PURCHASE $1,642.00 invoice 238896 Transaction Date 1/6/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,642.00 Refer 123102 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TRUCK #20 $648.07 Invoice 1008493 PO 17283 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $648.07 Refer 123102 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INCOR AP Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs PAYMENT THRU 12-15-02 $67,968.77 Invoice #3 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $67,968.77 Refer 123102 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $316.00 Invoice 284751 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $8,958.00 Invoice 284399 -161 - C TY OF OUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 19 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 609.49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $38.55 Invoice 284397 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,573.40 Invoice 283614 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $76.55 Invoice 283613 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,020~80 Invoice 284398 AP Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $257.00 Invoice 243384 AP Payment E 609.49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $873.40 Invoice 284250 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $15,113.70 Refer 123102 TODD, RICHARD AP Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE $106.37 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $106.37 Refer 123102 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY AP Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms WINTER WORK GOLVE $19.01 Invoice 221051 AP Payment E 601.49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms WINTER WORK GOLVE $19.01 Invoice 221051 AP Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms WINTER WORK GOLVE $19.01 Invoice 221051 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $57.03 Refer 123102 TRUE VALUE, MOUND AP Payment E 601.49400-221 Equipment Parts 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $16.09 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 101-41910-220 RepaidMaint Supply 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $228.98 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $47.54 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $71.41 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $44.69 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $14.81 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $128.94 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $13.16 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 101.43100-230 Shop Materials 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.67 Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.67 I Invoice 113002 AP Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.67 Invoice 113002 -162- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 20 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 11-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $226.55 Invoice 113002 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $884.18 Refer 123102 TRUE VALUE, NAVAARRE AP Payment $220.00 Invoice 112213 AP Payment $2.97 Invoice 111862 AP Payment $2.97 Invoice 111862 AP Payment $2.97 invoice 111862 AP Payment $9.57 Invoice 111492 AP Payment $9.57 Invoice 111492 AP Payment $9.57 Invoice 111492 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $257.62 Refer 123102 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY E 101-45200-101 F T Empl Regular E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 4.78 RUBBERIZED UNDERCOATING RUBBERIZED UNDERCOATING RUBBERIZED UNDERCOATING CHOPSAW WHEEL CHOPSAW WHEEL CHOPSAW WHEEL $46.17 $46.17 $46.17 $46.17 $46.17 $15.39 $15.39 $23,08 $23.08 $61.76 $15.66 $17.64 $34.93 $31.16 AP Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369449-0 AP Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369710-0 AP Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369791-0 AP Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 368825-0 AP Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369115-0 AP Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 369382-0 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 3-HOLE PUNCH INKED STAMP BINDERS CARTRIDGE, HIGHLIGHTES BINDERS -163- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES . $12.77 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies $12.77 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $12.77 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $12.77 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $12.77 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $4.26 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies $4.26 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $6.38 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $6.36 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $11.36 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $11.36 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $11.36 Invoice 369533-0 AP Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies $192.03 Invoice 368429-0 PO 17544 AP Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves $148.64 Invoice 17538 AP Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies $63.88 Invoice 369043-0 PO 17536 AP Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies $68.14 Invoice 368043-0 PO 17536 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 1213112002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,061.02 AP Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves UNIFORMS $61.90 Invoice 155101 PO 17539 AP Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves UNIFORMS $12.78 Invoice 154129 PO 17540 AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORMS $61.90 Invoice 156403 PO 17552 AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORMS $133.07 Invoice 156946 PO 17525 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $269 55 AP Payment E 609-49750-300 Professional Srvs PSYCHOLOGICAL INVENTORY $1,935.80 Invoice 2102 AP Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs PSYCHOLOGICAL INVENTORY $2,271.26 Invoice 2101 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $4,207.06 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE, BATTERIES LABEL MAKER INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE -164- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:29 AM Page 22 Current Period: Closing 2002 Refer 123102 AP Payment $362.50 Invoice 5754 AP Payment $848.00 Invoice 5755 AP Payment $1,265.00 Invoice 5738 AP Payment $1,272.00 Invoice 5735 AP Payment $1,331.00 Invoice 5714 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 12/31/2002 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $5,078.50 Fund Summary WIDMER, INCORPORA TED E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-16~02 BACKHOE AND LABOR E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-16-02 FORCEMAIN BREAK E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-05-02 WILSHIRE BREAK E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-11-02 WATERMAIN BREAK E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 11-12-02 LYNWOOD BREAK 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 20200 Accounts Payable $96,762.57 $12,569.17 $362.16 $24,547.04 $24,955.55 $15,190.28 $43,742.12 $78,639.47 $4,392.00 $301,160.36 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $301,160.36 $301,160.36 -165- CITY OF MOUND Payments 0~/09103 ~0:21 AM Page 1 Current Period: January 2003 Batch Name 010203SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $68,356.04 Posted Refer 10203 MCFOA Ck# 009236 1/2/2003 Cash Payment E 101-41500--433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $40.00 Invoice 010203 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $40.00 Refer 10203 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CIITES Ck# 009235 1/2/2003 Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training 01-15-03 REGISTRATION BUSINARO, GINO $65.00 Invoice 010203 Cash Payment E 101-41110-434 Conference & Training 01-15-03 REGISTRATION MEYER, PETE $65.00 Invoice 010203 Cash Payment E 101-41110-434 Conference & Training 02-28-03 REGISTRATION MEYER, PETE $175.00 Invoice 010203 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $305.00 Refer 10203 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Ck# 009230 1/2/2003 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2003 MAINTENANCE FAX $578.19 invoice 23486355 Cash Payment E 101-42400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2003 MAINTENANCE FAX $624.46 Invoice 23486353 ransaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,202.65 Refer 10203 NATIONAL VOLUNTEER FIRE COU Ck# 009240 1/2/2003 Cash Payment E 222.42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $50.00 Invoice 010103 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 10203 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Ck# 009228 1/2/2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-438 Licenses and Taxes 2003 TOBACCO LICENSE $250.00 Invoice 120902 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $250.00 Cash PaymenL E 101~1910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2003 FIRE A~RM SERVICE $795.02 Invoice 83820332 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $795.02 Cash Payment E 101~2400~34 Conference & Training ANNUAL CONFERENCE $186.00 Invoice 010203 PO 16976 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $186.00 Cash Payment E 101~1110~33 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $257.00 Invoice 0003516 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marque~e Bank Mou 10100 Total $257.00 Re~e; ~°203 FIRE bHl~ MN~ObiATib; Payment E 222~2260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES (6) $200.00 ~voice 010203 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 10203 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENWR Ck~ 009237 1/2/2003 -166- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:21 AM Page 2 Current Period: January 2003 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MClS 01-03 WASTEWATER $54,370.33 invoice 0000748214 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $54,370.33 Cash Payment E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees 2003 KENNEL FEES $1,919.61 Invoice 011503 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total - $1,919.61 Refer 10203 NAtiONAL ~i~E~"R~"E~TI~'~I~~ ~¢~; ii2i2~ Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 DUES, PALM, MIKE $135.00 Invoice 215035OX Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $135.00 Refer 10203 INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTYM Ck# 009232 1/2/2003 Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $702.50 Invoice 192650 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $702.50 Refer 10203 A+ CLEANING coNTRA~TOR~, iN ck# 00~2~ i;~;~)~ Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-03 CLEANING SERVICE $38.34 Invoice 010103 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-03 CLEANING SERVICE $38.34 ~voice 010103 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-03 CLEANING SERVICE $38.34 Invoice 010103 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 01-03 CLEANING SERVICE $1,260.96 Invoice 010103 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1 375 98 Cash Payment E 101-42115-329 Gopher One-Call 01-01-03 THRU 06-30-02 SIREN $594.00 MAINTENANCE Invoice 30335 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $594.00 Cash Payment E 455"46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 01-03 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $277.18 Invoice 010203 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 01-03 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $391.93 Invoice 010203 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $669.11 Refer 10203 CONCO, INCORPORATED CR~¢ 00~ 1/~/~0~3 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 01-03 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $435.55 Invoice 010203 Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 01-03 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $526.29 Invoice 010203 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total ~. 1 84Due 0 ~sh Payment E 609"49750-412 Building Rentals 01-03 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL $4,342.00 fi~voice 010203 Transaction Date 1/2/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,342.00 -167- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:21 AM Page 3 Current Period: January 2003 Fund Summary BATCH Total $68,356.04 101 GENERAL FUND · 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQU©R FUND 10100 Marquette Bank Mound $7,301.08 $385.00 $1,630.95 $38.34 $54,408.67 $4,592.00 $68,356.04 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $68,356.04 $o.oo $68,356.04 -168- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:22 AM Page 1 Current Period: January 2003 Batch Name 010803SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $5,700.00 Posted Refer 10803 BALBOA CENTER LIMITED PARTN Ck# 009244 1/8/2003 Cash Payment E 401-46580-412 Building Rentals GARAGE DOOR $5,500.00 Invoice 010603 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,500.00 Refer 10803 GRADY, DANIEL Ck# 009245 1/8/2003 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $200.00 Invoice 010803 Transaction Date 1/8/2003 Due 0 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $200.00 Fund Summary BATCH Total $5,700.00 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $200.00 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $5,500.00 $5,700.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $5,700.00 $o.oo $5,700.00 -169- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:20 AM Page 1 Batch Name 011403SUE User Dollar Amt $9,451.26 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $9,451.26 $0.00 In Balance Refer 11402 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract FINANCE SUPPORT $2,512.26 Invoice 9836 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,512.26 Refer 11403 BMS INTEGRATED OFFICE TECHN Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2003 TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE $95.00 Invoice 130512 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.00 Refer 11403 CEMETERIES, MINNESOTA ASSO Cash Payment E 280-45250-430 Miscellaneous 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $62,00 Invoice 010703 Transaction Date 1/7/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $62.00 Refer 11403 G&KSERVICES Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 01-07-03 MATS $44.89 Invoice 447076 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 01-07-03 MATS $105.17 ;~voice 447077 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 01-07-03 MATS $27.67 Invoice 447074 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 01-07-03 MATS $51~38 Invoice 447075 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $229.11 Refer 11403 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 101-42110-203 Printed Forms 2003 TRAFFIC TICKETS $413.60 Invoice 2002-12-30 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $413.60 Refer 11403 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 12-24-02 THRU 01-24-03 MAINTENANCE $125.17 COPIER Invoice 23543597 Transaction Date 1/3/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $125.17 Refer 11403 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins SPECIAL EVENT COVERAGE $250.00 Invoice 11721 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 11402 M~TR~ ~iCi~iTIES ~i Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $3,223.00 Invoice 416 ,;ash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES Invoice 122702 PO 17642 $205.00 -170- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/09/03 10:20 AM Page 2 Current Period: January 2003 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $205.00 Refer 11403 RIDGEVIEW BUSINESS HEALTH Cash Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical and Dental Fees EXAMS,VACCINE, ETC $944.00 Invoice 120902 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $944.00 Refer 11403 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal REMOVE TREES $713.55 Invoice 4370 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal REMOVE TREES $346.13 Invoice 4371 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,059.68 Refer 11403 THYSSEN-KRUPP ELEVATOR COR Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-03 AND 02-03 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE $332.44 Invoice 102056-B Transaction Date 1/6/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $332.44 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 280 CEMETERY FUND 601 WATER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Marquet~ Bank Mound $7,917.70 $988.89 $62.00 $2O5.OO $277.67 $9,451.26 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $9,451.26 $9,451.26 -171 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION APPOINTING GINO BUSlNARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR, AS ACTING CITY MANAGER FOR 2003. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby appoint Gino Businaro, Finance Director, as the Acting City Manager for the year 2003, to act in this capacity if the City Manager is disabled, incapacitated, away on City business or away on vacation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if both the City Manager and Acting City Manager are disabled, incapacitated, away on City business or away on vacation, then Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk, is hereby appointed as Acting City Manager. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -172- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LAKER AS OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 2003 WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute 412.831 states that the Council shall, annually, at its first meeting of the year, designate a legal newspaper of general circulation in the City as its official newspaper; and WHEREAS, publication of ordinances and other matters as required by law are to be so published, and such other matters as the Council may deem advisable and in the public interest to have published in this manner; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby designate The Laker as the official newspaper for the City of Mound for 2003. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -173- J~. 6,2003 4:E2PM L~KER&PIO~KE~ N0.947 P.E/E THE LAKER & P ONEER 2365 Commerce Bird,, Mound, MN g$364 January 2, 2003 To: City of Mound Re: Appointment of Official Newspaper Dear Councilmembers: As you make your appointments for 2003, we ask that you consider m-appointing the Laker as your official newspaper. The Laker is published each Saturday. The deadline for legal notices is noon the preceding Tuesday. Our rate for publication of legal notices is $7.96 per column inch for the initial insertion, and $5,79 per column for each additional insertion. The col- umn width is 1.833 incl~es, We have enjoyed working with you in the past, and we look forward to continuing to do so, Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,. ~ / Bill Holm / Managing Editor Laker/Pioheer Newspapers (952) 472-1140 -174- Lakeshore News 10001 Wayzata BouLevard Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305 612-473-0890 Fax: 612-473-0895 December 17, 2002 The City Of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Attn: Kandis Hanson Dear City Council Members: We at Lakeshore Weekly News look forward to the opportunity to serve as your city's legal newspaper for 2003. First, let me briefly describe the Lakeshore Weekly News newspaper. Each Tuesday, we publish one edition that serves the entire Lake Minnetonka community. We distribute 25,000 papers to 19 communities surrounding the lake. We strive to provide in-depth coverage of city and school district events. We also endeavor to inform residents about upcoming issues of interest. We welcome press releases from cities that alert the community about upcoming public hearings or commission vacancies, as well as events such as brash and leaf drop-off programs. We will publish these press releases before the event, and, in the case of important issues coming before the council, we will try to ensure that a staff writer writes an article explaining why the issue is of concern. Our rates for publishing legal notices for 2003 are: .98 per line for the first insertion .65 per line for the second insertion These rates are based on a one-column width. The deadline for submitting legal notices is noon Friday for the following Tuesday's newspaper. Notices can be submitted via e-mail, fax or U.S. mail. Notices can be e-mailed to sgkorus@weeklynews.com, or faxed to (952) 473-0895. Invoices are sent on a monthly basis, and two notarized affidavits of each notice of publication will accompany the invoice. We appreciate your consideration of our bid for legal notices, and we look forward to serving as your legal newspaper for 2003. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to give me a call. Sinc ly, ~ ~ Publisher Phone: (952) 843-4612 -175- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the purchase of Feast a $20,000 bond for the City Clerk, Bonnie Ritter. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. and seconded by Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -176- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY TREASURER/FINANCE DIRECTOR BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the purchase of least a $20,000 bond for the City Treasurer/Finance Director, Gino Businaro. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. and seconded by Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -177- CITY OF MOUND I~ESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR 2003 WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute Chapter 427 requires the City to select an official depository/depositories for City funds within 30 days of the start of the City's fiscal year; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby designate the following banks and financial institutions as official depositories for the City of Mound in 2003: Crow River Bank Firstar USBank Minnesota Municipal Money Market Funds RBC Dain Rauscher Salomon Smith Barney Wells Fargo BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City's deposits shall be protected by Federal Deposit Insurance and/or collateral in accordance with MSA Chapter 118A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Finance Director is hereby authorized to open or continue an account or accounts with said institutions on such terms as required by said institutions in the names of the City, and to deposit, or cause to be deposited in such account or accounts, any monies, checks, drafts, orders, notes or other instruments for the payment of money, upon compliance by said depository with this resolution and the law in such case Provided. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the designation shall continue in force until December 31,2003, or until written notice of its revision or modification has been received by said institution. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -178- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION APPOINTING MARK HANUS AS ACTING MAYOR FOR 2003. WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 412.121 states that at its first meeting each year the Council shall choose an Acting Mayor from the Councilmembers; and WHEREAS, The Acting Mayor shall perform the duties of Mayor during the disability or absence of the Mayor from the City or, in the case of vacancy in the office of Mayor, until a successor has been appointed and qualifies; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to appoint Mark Hanus as Acting Mayor for 2003. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. and seconded by Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -179- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION TO APPOINT JIM FACKLER AS ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR 2003 BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby appoint Parks Director, Jim Fackler, as the Assistant Weed Inspector for the City of Mound in 2003, The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -180- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION APPOINTING MARK HANUS TO THE DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION, DAVID OSMEK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AND BOB BROWN TO THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby appoint the following Councilmembers as Council Representatives to the following City Advisory Commissions for the year 2003: Mark Hanus to the Docks and Commissions Commission David Osmek to the Planning Commission Bob Brown to the Parks and Open Space Commission The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the positive: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of January, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -181 - 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Matt Simoneau, Building Official 1/9/2003 2003 Contract from Paul Waldron & Associates - backup inspection services As the City Council is aware, all building inspections are handled in-house effective July 2002. However, in the event of my absence (ie. vacations, illness, seminars, etc.) City staff has made arrangements with Paul Waldron & Associates to provide backup inspection services for 2003. For your review and consideration, a contract agreement with Paul Waldron & Associates has been prepared. Members of the Council are advised that the draft document has been reviewed by City staff,, including the City Attomey, and has also been reviewed by Mr. Waldron's office as well. -182- AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ., by and between the City of Mound, Minnesota and Paul Waldron & Associates, Ltd., a Minnesota Corporation (Waldron). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City is desirous of contracting with Waldron for the performance of the hereinafter specified inspection services within the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, Waldron is agreeable to rendering services on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Inspection Services. Waldron will provide inspection services for the City of Mound on the following terms and conditions: A. Provide field inspections on an as needed basis. B. Perform on-site construction inspections required for Building Code enforcement on an as-needed basis. C. Provide building and plumbing inspection reports and other information for the permanent records kept by the City. D. City shall be entitled to approve individuals proposed by Waldron to carry out the services. 2. Independent Contractor. It is acknowledged by and between the parties hereto that Waldron is an independent contractor contracting with the City to perform the services as provided in this agreement. In connection therewith, Waldron shall provide the following: Auto Insurance- Paul Waldron & Associates, Ltd., in carrying out Waldron's obligation under this agreement, shall supply, upon the request of the City, a Certificate of Insurance for hired and non-owned auto usage coverage for liability in the amounts of $100,000 per claim, $300,000 per occurrence coverage for personal injury and $25,000 per claim, $50,000 per occurrence for property damage insurance. Further upon request, shall furnish copies of employee's declaration pages showing compliance with the above limits. -183- Bo Health, Worker's Compensation, Unemployment Compensation- Personnel assigned to perform the Services to be provided by Waldron pursuant to this agreement shall be officers or employees of Waldron, and Waldron shall assume all obligations with regard to salary, worker's compensation, retirement contributions, withholding tax, health insurance, and unemployment insurance in regard to such personnel. The City shall not be required to fumish any benefits to the officers or employees of Waldron. Co Certifications- Waldron shall be responsible for continuing education and maintenance of certification under the laws of the State of Minnesota of all individuals Waldron provides to the City for performance of inspection services, and shall be responsible for supplying any and all technical manuals and reference matehals. Do Errors and Omissions Insurance General Liability- Waldron shall provide the City upon request with copies of Errors and Omissions Insurance General Liability in an amount of at least $500,000 covering all personnel employed by Waldron in the capacity if acting as a Building Official for the City. 3. Effective Date of Service. The effective date of service to which the terms of this agreement shall apply be on the __ day of ,2003. 4. Termination of Agreement. This agreement shall remain in force and effect from the effective date of service for a one (1) year period of time, or until cancelled by either party upon thirty (30) days advance written notice. 5. Cost to the City for Services. The City shall pay to Waldron for services under this contract the following: A. Required field inspections at the rate of $40.00 per hour. B. Time required to appear in court on prosecution of any Building Code violations at $40.00 per hour. Waldron shall submit logs with any such statements for services rendered under this subsection. No charges for services at an hourly rate may be made unless there has been prior direction to Waldron by the City. -184- 6. Inspection Outside Normal Business Hours and Holidays. Waldron shall not be available to provide inspection services, other than for emergency, on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, Friday after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve Afternoon, Christmas Day, and New Year's Eve Afternoon. Normal business hours for Waldron shall be between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. 7. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. Waldron shall hold harmless and indemnify the City from any and all claims of any nature brought by others injured or damaged by the actions of Waldron, its officers, employees or agents. This agreement to hold harmless and indemnify shall not apply to any claim arising out of a situation where Waldron has previously notified the City in writing of a failure by an owner or permittee to comply with the Building Code and the City fails to enforce the Building Code or arising out of a situation involving an existing or future platted lot with corrected soils, filled soils or a building pad. 8. Assignment. Waldron may not assign any of its rights or duties under this agreement without the prior written consent of the City, with the exception of State of Minnesota Fire Marshall office on Sprinkler System plan review. 9. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement of the parties. -185- 10. Choice of Law. This agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the State of Minnesota Law. 11. Representation of Authority. The undersigned executing this agreement for Paul Waldron & Associates, LTD., represents and warrants that he has been duly authorized to execute this agreement on behalf of Paul Waldron & Associates, LTD., by the corporation's Board of Directors, and that this agreement shall bind the corporation to the terms and obligations contained herein. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement in duplicate this __ day of ., 2003. PAUL WALDRON & ASSOCIATES, LTD. By Paul Waldron, President CITY OF MOUND: By Mayor By City Manager -186- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To~ From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jim Fackler, Parks Director / Sarah Smith, Community Development Director 1/7/2003 2003 Fee Schedule Amendment - Public Lands Permit Summary At its December 10, 2002 meeting, the City Council reviewed and discussed the proposed 2003 Fee Schedule. Following discussion, the Council requested that the proposed application fee of $200.00 for public lands permits be remanded back to staff for additional research. Specifically, members of the City Council requested that a reduced fee be considered for minor projects (ie. tree trimming, etc.). Based on its review, City staff proposes the following fee structure: Minor Project Projects valued less than $1000 - as determined by staff. $25.00 It is anticipated that the proposed $25.00 administrative fee would cover most small projects (ie. minor grading or tree trinuuing projects). Members of the Council are advised that minor projects usually do not require additional permits nor review by the City's consultant therefore a reduced fee seems appropriate. Major Project Projects valued more than $1000 - as determined by staff $200.00 It is anticipated that the proposed $200 fee would cover the City's costs for review of larger projects which usually require both interdepartmental and consultant review. A good example of this type of project is the public lands permit application which was submkted in 2002 for parking lot and retaining wall improvements in the Belmont Lane right-of-way. -187- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Fees shall be hereby established. In the event of a conflict between this schedule and the City Code, the fee schedule shall prevail. An application or code provision may require payment of fees for consultation with experts, professionals or other qualified persons or for other matters, which may result in the imposition of a fee greater than listed in this fee schedule. ADMINISTRATIVE FEES & CHARGES 400.20 Assessment search Comprehensive Plan Copies Duplicate license/permit Duplicate meeting tapes Minutes Notary (set by State) Recycling container purchase Recycling container replacement Returned Check Zoning Ordinance COBRA Continuation Administration Fee $20/search $30 .25/page $10 each $3/tape .25/page $1 each at cost at cost $25/check $20 2% AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION Amusements: (Set by State) Expire April 30 410.10 Mechanical Amusement Machines Arcades: Expire Dec. 31st 405.00 Arcade Permit (fee per machine) Bowlincl: Expire April 30 420.05 Bowling (fee per alley) $15/location + $15/machine $15/location + $15/machine $20/yr. 1 -188- BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION Buildinq Permit: 300.20 Wrecking permit Minor building Minor building to be replaced $5O on same site Single family wood frame Duplex Multiple dwelling: 1st two units Each addn'l unit Industrial,commercial ,institutional: $5O $150 $2OO $2OO $25O Total cost of wrecking at $6 for each $500 or fraction thereof of the market value of such work. Gas burners: Not exceeding 99,999 BTU 100,000 - 199,999 BTU 200,000 - 399,999 BTU 400,000 - 599,999 BTU 600,000 - 999,999 BTU $10 $15 $30 $44 $60 Install/remove flammable & combustible liquids and Tank not buried enclosed 500 gallons or less $10 Over 500 gallons $15 Tank buried or enclosed $25 Removal of combustible/ flammable liquid tank $15 Removal of storage tanks of above/below ground liquid gas $15 LP tanks 311.00 315.20 Heating, air conditioning & ventilation Contract prices Gas piping Trailers Occupancy permit Mobile Home Set-up Inspection Fee $20 min. or 1% of contract price, whichever is greater $5 for up to 3 openings $1 for each additional opening $100 $75 315.35 Appeal to applicant $5O 320.00 Public Lands Permit- minor Public Lands Permit - major $25 $2oo Contractor License Verification $5 4 -189- Engineering "Planning ° Surveying January 8, 2003 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2002 Retaining Wall Replacement MFRA #13215 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Sunram's Payment Request No. 3 for work completed through December 15, 2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $67,968.77. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Jim Fackler, Parks Director Enclosure s:Xmain:h-nou 13215Xspecs\part-payl-8 -190- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mail: mfra@mfra, com C m i'll m ~ m~ · rn Z -.I ~o --I t-- ..< ZZ;~ m -191 - 0 0 m ~: -0 rn ,.< m Z -I t~ --I m o.~ --I >_> m -192- · 2~ z 8 q~o~°8~888~8g ~ ~8 8 88 8 888 ~8~8 ~ ~8 8 ~ ~8~g888~88~8 ~ ~8 8 88 ~ 8~8 g898 8 88 -193- -< 0 Z m 0 z~o Bg>~ m m 8 Z 0 .-I -I m -194- Engineering ° Planning ° Surveying January 7, 2003 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2002 Storm Sewer Improvements Partial Payment MFRA//13677 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc.'s_ Payment Request No. 3 for work completed through December 15, 2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $37,922.36. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director, City of Mound Greg Skinner, Public Works Superintendent, City of Mound Enclosure s:kmain:hMou 13677:\CorrespondenceXhanson 1-6 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com -195- Ill Z -'1 ITl 0 C I'TI 03 oo ~° ~ o 0 --q ~.o~8 ~ --,:g~ o o ~ -< :1 -196- 0 < 0 ~ 0 Z C C -197- 888888888 88888888888888888 ~888~8~8~ ~. ~ oo°° 888888888 8 88888888888888888 ooooo oooo ooooooooooo oooooo 000000000 0 00000000000000000 888888888o° 88888888°°8888888oo ~ ~8 oooo~oo~o ~oo~ ~omooo ~ o oo 8~ oo 888888888 o 88888888888888888 oo~ ~ oooo~oo~o~oo~ oo~oooo~o ~ oooooooo8oo~moooo 888888888o° 88888888888888888 m z m m m -198- a aooooobbbb b'bbbb bbbb ~ooooo~ ~~ ~§§~ m°°°°°°°~9 ~ 9 .... 8 888o° o ~oo ..... .o .o. , .o,o 8 8888 8 88888 oooooobbbb 8888888888o ° 8 88888 o° 8888 8 88888 0000000000 8888888888 ooooo ~ ~~ ~WWbW oooo ooooo 88888 ~ ~ oooo~ 8888 8 88888 .opp. 8888888888 ........... ~ 00000 0000 00000 88888 o o .cD .o. . . .cD ooooo 8 8888 8 88888 o~ ~ c ~ Z m 0 "0 .-t 0 m m --I r- -.-I ~8 z m bo -199- Engineering · Planning ° Surveying January 7, 2003 Ms. Kandis Hanson City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SLTBJECT: City of Mound Improvement Project 2002 Mound Visions 2nd Addition Partial Payment MFRA #13646 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Doboszenski & Sons' Payment Request No. 4 for work completed through December 15, 2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $24,492.04. Also included with the Payment Request is Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $11,800.00 for Post Indicator valves for the five commercial buildings. We have reviewed this Payment Request and Change Order, find them in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Enclosure s:Xmain:Xmou 13646Xspecs\part-pay 1-6 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-maih mfra¢mfra.com -200- ommm 0 z 0000 0 0 C Z -201 - bbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb ~ oooo~oo oooo~o ~ o~oooooo~o~oooooo z~ 8 88888888888888 C bbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbobbbbbbbbbo · 99999999999009 9 9999999999999999~ oo 88888888888888 ~ 8~888888888888888 o 8 88888888888888 g 888888888988~8888 C ~ Z bbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbbbb~bobbbbb ~m ~ 888888888888oooo o ldo.. Z > m 7 m m 7 m -202- oo oo 888~ oo oooooo ~bbbbbbbbb oo88oo 88888888~ o8 ...... ~ . 888oo 8 o oo o 88888888~ FY1 o o 88 8 8888 O0 O00000 O000000000 8 88 ~ 8 888888 8 8888888888 P.0 ~o 8 88 ~ 888~ .0op .o.0.o.0.0.0D ~ ~0~ ~ aa oooooo b~bbbbbbbbb ~ ~8 ~ 8 888888 ~ 888888888~ 888888 o ~ 888888°°°~ 0000 -203- 0 · .< 0 Z Itl 0 E~ ~oo m -204- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -205- Page 1 of 1 Kandis M Hanson From: To: Cc: Sent: Subject: "Todd Christopherson" <tchristoph@amconconstruction.com> "Hanson, Kandis" <kandishanson@cityofmound.com> "Mound Fire Department" <moundfiredept(~hotmail.com>; "Bontrager, Sam" <sbontrager@sehinc.com>; "Britz, Miles" <mbritz@sehinc.com>; "Hanson, Kandis" <kandishanson@cityofmound.com>; "McKinley, John" <johnmckinley814@yahoo.com>; "Smith, Sarah" <sarahsmith@cityofmound.com>; "Bob G. (Laptop & Phone)" <BobG.Laptop&Phone@amconconstruction.com>; "Prosser, James" <jprosser@ehlers-inc.com>; "Ritter, Bonnie" <bonnieritter@cityofmound.com>; "Schultz, Nancy" <nschultz@sehinc. com>; "Simoneau, Matt" <mattsimoneau@cityofmound.com> Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:47 AM bid award recommendations. We recommend making the following contract awards at the Council meeting on Tuesday, 1/14/03: Contract C-02 Veit & Company - Rogers - $567,800. Contract C-08 Concrete Kelleher Construction of Burnsville - $466,872 (base bid $430,372 + alternate 8, $36,500) Contract C-10 Masonry Axel Ohman of Minneapolis - $160,000 (base bid $283,000 less alternate 8, $123,000) Contract C-16 Doors, Frames, Hardware ~ Supply Only -Straughan Hardware of Minneapolis - $47,233 Contract C-32 Mechanical Construction - Allied Mechanical Systems of Hutchinson - $613,650. Contract C-33 Electrical Construction - Ridgedale Electric, Long Lake - $362,000 VVe are continuing to work with these and the other contracts yet to be awarded for value engineering ideas and cost savings. We will give a brief update on that with our presentation Tuesday. Our plan is to recommend award of the balance of the contracts at the 1/28 Council meeting. In addition, we will review cost saving options and recommendations with the Council at that time. There will be 3 or 4 contracts that we will recommend a re-bid on. I would anticipate this re-bid to occur in February with no delay to the overall project. Thanks Todd Christopherson, P.E. Amcon CM, LLC Burnsville, MN 55337 952-808-5369 direct 952-890-0064 fax 952-200-4955 T-Mobile (this replaces previous Nextel) visit our NEW website at www.amconconstruction.com - 206- 1/9/03 -207- -208- -209- Mound Levy question Proposed 2003 taxable tax capacity (per Gloria RoybaI-Henn Co 1/6/03) Tax capacity on 185,000 home (185,000*1%) Tax rate per $100,000 of levy Taxes on home 7,076,730.00 1,850.00 0.01413082 26.14201757 C:\Documents and Settings~Administrator\Local Settings\Temporary internet Files\Content. lE5\K12FS1[ -210- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: 1/9/2003 Re: Planning Commission Appointments Summary The terms of Planning Commissioners Becky Glister, Jorj Ayaz and Orv Burma expired on December 31, 2002. Regretfully, Mr. Burma has opted not to seek reappointment however both Ms. Glister and Mr. Ayaz have submitted applications and wish to be considered for reappointment. The City also received applications from Peter Black, Gregg Raines, Michael Cowell, Mark Hagan and John Evans. Members of the City Council are advised that interviews of the candidates took place on November 8, 2002. Details regarding the candidate interviews and selection process are contained in the November 18, 2002 and December 9, 2002 meeting minutes which have been included as attachments. Recommendation Based on its review, members of the Planning Commission have recommended that Becky Glister, Jori Ayaz and Gregg Raines be appointed to the Planning Commission. -211- Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 2002 MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 18, 2002 Planning Commission Reappointments MOTION by Weiland, seconded by Brown, to recommend reappointment of Becky Glister. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Weiland, seconded by Brown, to recommend reappointment of Jorj Ayaz. MOTION carried unanimously. Planning Commission Interviews Peter Black Greg Raines Michael Cowell Mark Hagan John Evans Mueller indicated he is concerned that asking a specific question of the candidates doesn't draw out the specific information. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Weiland, to postpone voting on the candidates until there is clarification. MOTION carried unanimously. Peter Black - He actively recruits new people to move here and is excited about the redevelopment activities. He feels zoning issues should be based on the ordinances that are in place and if we have a chance to change a zoning law and/or policy and it should be taken under consideration. Mr. Black is originally from the east side and faced adversity when his family moved to the western suburbs. He likes the small town feel and supporting the local guy. He dislikes the vacant buildings. The area will definitely improve in the future. He is a proponent of affordable housing and owns a few houses in Minneapolis. Housing diversity is important and there is a need for life-cycle housing in all communities. Greg Raines - Mr. Raines has been a resident of Mound for (5) years and lives on the Island by Al &Alma's. He currently works for Minnetonka Realty and has a background in finance and real estate. He loves the area but is very concerned about some of the new projects. His wife is involved in the Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Raines finds the people very friendly and likes the community. Mound has a nice small town feel and he equates it similar to where he was raised. What he likes or dislikes most about the community is the regulations with regard to exterior storage especially vehicles. He is -212- Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 2002 supportive of clean-up efforts. Mr. Raines feels we need to Consider the rising senior market who are being driven out of their homes due to rising tax. He indicated that housing available for seniors is important. He indicated that there is some negative vibe in the Comprehensive Plan with regard to attracting new / expanding businesses, He feels that the history of the area needs to be considered when addressing zoning in particular areas. He believes that economics will ultimately decide how properties develop in the future. He further commented that we have to be concerned about how much subdivision could be tolerated. Michael Cowell - Mr. Cowell lives at 4648 Aberdeen Road and works in the insurance field in Edina. Has lived in Mound for year and been in insurance for 5 years. One of the problems in Mound is that we do not have enough land reserved for business purposes. One way to address affordable housing would be to build a complex that includes units that are purchased. He indicated that the new development is a big high to be qualify for affordable housing. Mr. Cowell said he and his wife enjoy the "small town" feel and also enjoy living and being near the lake. He firther commented that the lack of businesses in town for convenience purposes is a problem, especially food establishments. Mark Hagen - Mr. Hagen lives at 6382 Maple Road. Previously he lived on Bluebird Lane and in Thousand Oaks, California and was born in Iowa. He grew up in a bedroom community west of the L.A. basin. He enjoyed being in the country and appreciated that "open space" in California while growing up. Mr. Hagen spent an amount of time working with the community in California, trying to preserve open space and consensus building activities including finding interested parties who would benefit and use the space. Mark indicated that its important that we have affordable housing it but believes that it is real value and representative element for the community especially if we are going to have a labor market here. He questions whether or not the housing value that is in Mound qualifies as affordable. Mr. Hagen has seen the concept plans for the Mound Vision and is very interested to see how the walking areas and/or pedestrian areas will be tied together. As the area goes, it seems exciting to see that many people will have their needs met through the parks and retail shops without having to drive, especially since the traffic connections are not that strong. A strong City-scape will be nice and he is interested to see how it will be laid out. Mr. Hagen indicated that he would like to make sure that folks are given good zoning information that meets their needs. He likes the convenience to downtown Minneapolis yet when you are here you are far away from downtown. He likes to preserve the rural town flavor. He stated that he often talks to folks who feel that they are not being heard or understood. He commented that he personally feels that they are just not getting involved. It sometimes seems that Mound is the backwater of Minnetonka and that it is just not as nice as Excelsior etc. Mound should have a better sense of itself. -213- Planning Commission Minutes November 18, 2002 John Evans - Mr. Evans lives on Arbor Lane. He has lived in Mound 5 years. He indicated that he has an agenda that includes a requirement to carry paper bags to pick up after animals. He would like to see the town continue in the direction it is going and wants to see the coastline improved and enhanced. He is thrilled by the downtown development especially on the shoreline. He is excited about the hotel where friends and relatives can stay. He would like to see the name of the City changed, as it doesn't reflect that we are a lakefront city. He wants to improve the image. He admits that he doesn't know a lot about zoning. He would like the brick color to change on the post office. When asked to consider Mounds future in affordable housing he indicated that he preferred not to see manufactured housing in areas where they don't currently exist. Mr. Evans likes Mound's location and the fact that it has more shoreline than many other cities. He also commented that we have so much to do right now and that we are right of the edge of something great. He doesn't like that some of the ordinances aren't enforced including trash thrown about and uncut grass. He wants to see a ship shape community in tiptop shape. Things should be done on time including leaf raking, brush disposal, etc. Burma indicated that the recommendations would be made at the December 9, 2002 meeting. Appointments will be made by the City Council at its annual meeting on Tuesday, January 14,2002 as required by the City Code. -214- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 9, 2002 A. Planning Commission Appointment Vote taken - Greg B. Raines will be the recommended candidate. -215- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Honorable Mayor Pat Meisel, City Council Members, City Manager Kandis Hanson j~ Jim Fackler, Parks Director~~ January 6, 2003 Reappointment of Parks and Docks Commissioners This is to advise you that the Park and Open Space Advisory Commission did not have any commissioners up for reappointment in the year 2002. However, the Docks and Commons Advisory Commission had two members, Frank Ahrens and Gerald Jones, up for reappointment in the year 2002. Both Frank and Gerald confirmed their interest in reappointment for the term January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2005. printed on recycled paper -216- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com MEMO DATE: September 27, 2002 TO: FROM: RE: Frank Ahrens, Docks & Commons Commission Gerald Jones; Docks & Commons Commission Orr Burma, Planning Commission Becky Glister, Planning Commission Jorj Ayaz, Planning Commission Kandis Hanson, City Managev4~ ' Term Expirations You are at the end of your term as a c'ommission member. In preparatio'n for the Mound City Council Annual Meeting, Mayor Meisel would like to confirm your interest in being reappointed to your volunteer'position ~erving the City. Please indicate below regarding your interest and return this memo Jim Fackler or Sarah Smith by Oct 18, 2002. You may fax it to 952-472-0620, or mail it to or drop it at City Hall at 5341 Maywood Road. Feel free to use the drop boxes after hours. Thank you for your willingness to serve over the years! Commission on which I serve: .~oc ~ r Please consider me for reappointment for another term: Oct, 7. 2002 12:42PM FISCAL & ADMIN SERVICES CiTY OF MOU'ND No, 5453 5~41 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 P,H.: (958) 472.-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. c.ttyofmound.com IVIEMO DA.-TE-:- TO: September 27, 2002 'F.F~:h'k ~renscDocks & Commons Commission Gerald Jones, Docks & Commons Commission Orr.Burma, Planning. Commission Becky Glister, Planning Commission Jori Ayaz, Planning Commission FROM: Kan; dis Hanson, C, ity Manag%- ;.':"~'7 '':," ::". .... .':'.:,,. ..... . ..... : ....... ~.: .... t...,,.....:,.:.~:;..:.:..,...,.!. ~..: :.'L'.".:.:;.i~'.¢ ~'.,:!,!)' Term EXlS'ii;htions· You are at the end of your term as a commission member. In preparation for the Mound City Council .Anrmal Meeting, Mayor Meisel would like io confirm your interest in being reappointed 'to' your volunteer position serving the City. Please indicate below regarding your inte/:est and return this memo Jim Fackler or Sarah Smith by Oct 18, 2002. You may fax it to 952-472-0620, or mail it to or drop it at City Hall at 5341 Maywood Road. Feel fi:ee to use the drop bo>~es after hour~. · Thank you for your Will'.m~. 'ess to serve over tile years! My name: PI ase c " ........ ' '" ;"' for another term: onszder me for reappomtment ; ' . ,:.- ~ . .'.,.. 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Matt Simoneau, Building Official / Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: 1/10/2003 Re: Building Permit Application - Structural Repair Summary The City has received a building permit fi.om Robert Huffi'nan to repair and/or replace the west basement wall of his house located at 5124 Tuxedo Boulevard. Because the existing dwelling has a non-conforming lakeside setback, City Council approval is required to make the proposed improvements. As set forth in City Code 350:420, Subd. 8, alterations may be made to a building containing lawful non-conforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units, upon approval by the City Council. As the City Council may be aware, the previous owner of the property applied for a similar permit in 1987. Please see attached. Recommendation City staff recommends that the building permit for the aforementioned improvements be approved. For your review and consideration, a draft resolution has been prepared. -219- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03- A RESOLUTION APPROVING STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TO A NON- CONFORMING STRUCTURE ON LOT 14, BLOCK 2 WHIPPLE SHORES AT 5124 TUXEDO BOULEVARD PID #24-117-24-43-0062 WHEREAS, the applicant, Robert Huffman, has applied for a building permit to replace and/or repair the west foundation wall; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 single family zoning district, which according to the City Code, requires a 30 foot front yard setback, a 6 foot sideyard setback(s), a 50 foot lakeshore setback and a minimum flood plain elevation of 933.0 foot N.G.V.D. above Lake Minnetonka for the lowest basement floor; and WHEREAS, the existing residential structure is deemed to be non-conforming due to a (30) foot lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, the residential use of the property is conforming with the regulations of the R-2 District; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350.420 Subd. 8 provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful non-conforming residential unit when the alteration will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units if approved by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council previously recognized the existing non-conforming principal structure setback at 5124 Tuxedo Boulevard as part of Resolution No. 87-180 dated September 27, 1987. -220- The City Council hereby authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 350.420, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, non-conforming use, subject to all the provisions and restrictions of City Code Section 350.420. It is determined that the livability of the residential unit will be improved by authorizing the following structural alterations to the non-conforming use property: To allow structural foundation replacement of the west wall of the existing dwelling. The foregoing resolution was seconded by Councilmember moved by Councilmember and The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 14, 2003 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -221 - Building Permit Application City of Mound, 5341 MayWood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 952-472-0607 Fax: 952-472-0679 SITE Property Address ~.~ l ~-~ ~ L~,X (¢.,(_O ~J ~ Business Name/Tenant ~..~ I~ ¢¢~ A, pplicant is: [] Owner [] Contractor [] Tenant LEGAL Lot ,-~ IL\ Block ,2.. Plat# DESCRIPTION Subdivision ~J~'~ pg~,~. PID Cf ow.E. N me Address -~ [ ~'~ TL,L~ ~ ~ Home Phone C~5~,. ~q~, ~,.l,~:c[ Other c~,.~ CONTRACTOR Company Name //'"/~'/,'1,1,~ ~-)d. cr/,~, License # Contact Person Address Home Phone Other ARCHITECT Name AND/OR Address ENGINEER Home Phone Other DESCRIBE WORK: r'~ ,o~.~.(:~.//r~f ~.,~i.,r --" ~u~(,~ri. ov~ ~uc.z,t( o~ ~,J~3,~- ~or_~¢ ~,,v-[- Luc~[I. VALUATION OF WORK: $ ,,~ ~'~.,~O VALUE APPROVED $ Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilating or air conditioning. Permits become null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. Time Limits on Buildina Completion. All work to be performed pursuant to a building permit obtained for new construction, repairs, remodeling, and alterations to the exteriors of any building or structure in any zoning distdct shall be completed within one (1) year fro~ the date of permit issuance. The person obtaining the permit and the owner of the property shall be responsible for completion. A violation of this ordinance is a misdemeanor offense. The City Council may extend the time for completion upon written request of the permittee, establishing to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Council ,that circumstances beyond the control of the pe~Tnittee prevented completion of the work for which the permit was granted. The extension shall be requested not less than thirty (30) business days prior to the end of the one-year pedod. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit do4es not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. PRINT APPLICANT'S NAME APPLICANT'S SIGN,a~'L/IRE DATE (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY & DATE COPIED APPROVED ZONING PLANS CHECKED BY CITY ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS APPROVED BY & DATE ASSESSING BUILDING OFFICIAL Mound City Code --350.420 350.420 Non-conforming Uses. Sub& 1. Any structure or use lawfully existing upon the effective date of this Chapter may be continued at the size and in a manner of operation, existing upon such date. Subd. 2. condition necessary structure. Nothing in this Chapter shall prevent restoring of a structure to safe when said structure is declared unsafe by the City, providing further that the repairs shall not constitute more than 50% of the fair market vaiu¢ of such Subd, 3. When any lawful non-conforming use of any structure or land in any district has been changed to a conforming use, it shall not thereafter be changed to any non-' conforming use. Subd. 4. Whenever a lawful non-conforming structure shall have been damaged by fire, flood, explosion, earthquake, war, riot, or act of God, it may be reconstructed and used as before if it be reconstructed within twelve (12) months after such calamity, unless the damage to the building or structure is 50 percent or more of its fair market value as shown on the assessor's records at the time of damage in which case the whole thereof shall be demolished and any construction thereafter shall be for a use in a~eordanee with the provisions of this Ordinance. Subd. 5. Whenever a lawful non-conforming use of a structure or land is discontinued for a period of twelve (12) months, any future use of said structure or l~d shall be in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter. Sub&. 6. A lawful non-conforming use of a structure or parcel of land may be changed to a similar non-conforming use or to a more restrictive non-conforming use. Som~. non.conforming uses are permitted by conditional use permits. Once a structure or pamol, of land has been placed in a more restrictive non-conforming use, it shall not return to a less restrictive non-conforming use. Subd. 7, Normal maintenance of a building or other structure containing or related to a law~,, non-conforming use is permitted, including necessary non-structural repairs and incidental alterations that do not extend or the non-conforming use.. · Sub&, 8. may be made to a building containing lawful non,conforming residentiai units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided, they will not incmas~ the number of dwelling units, with the recommendation and approval of the City C~ ,~¢iiL 22 -223- 215100 L_oF I4 -224- ?>' ¢'x 5 .. 258 September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87-180 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE EMERGENCY STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TO A NON-CONFORMING'STRUCTURE ON LOT .14, WHIPPLE SHORES, PID # 24-117-24 43 0062.' (5124 TUXEDO. BOULE- VARD) P & Z CASE NO. 87-664 WHEREAS, the applicant, Richard Rucinski, and the owner, Robert Huffman, have applied for a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming 30 foot set- back to lakeshore for Lot 14, Whipple Shores; PID # 24-1i7-24 43 0062; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 single family zoning district, which according to the City code, requires a 30 foot front yard setback, a 6 foot sideyard setback, 50 foot lakeshore setback, with a minimum flood plain elevation of 933.5 foot N.G.V.D. above Lake Minnetonka for the lowest basement floor; and : WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful non-conforming residential unit when the alteration will improve the llvability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: I. That ~he City does hereby authorize the existi.ng non-conforming principal structure setback at 5124 Tuxedo Boulevard; PID # 24-t17-24 43 0062. The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation and authorlzes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision'(8) with the clear and express understanding that the use re- mains as a lawful, non-conforming use, subject to all the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. It is-determined that the llvabl]ity of the residential unit will be improved by authorizing the following structural alterations to the non-conforming use property: To allow structural foundation replacement of the north and east walls of the e.xi st ing dwelling. , The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Johnson and seconded by Councilmember Abel. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Attest: City Clerk -225- Mound, MN 66364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Comm. Development Director DATE: January 8, 2003 SUBJECT: Variance Request - Area Identification Sign OWNER: Mound Marketplace LLC CASE NUMBER: 02-41 LOCATION: Mound Visions 2na Addition PID: 14-117-24-44-0067 ZONING: Destination Unit Planned Development District COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Auto Destination District BACKGROUND At its January 6, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request from Mound Marketplace LLC for a variance to allow construction of a (25) foot area identification sign near the north entrance located along the west side of Commerce Boulevard. Members of the City Council are advised that this type of sign is limited to no more than (15) feet in the B-1 District. PROJECT DETAILS Details regarding the variance application are contained in Planning Report No. 02-41. MEETING OVERVIEW The majority of the discussion at the Planning Commission meeting focused on the design of the structure including backlighting of the tenant signboard. Members of the Planning Commission also discussed the history of the project including the clock tower which was previously located at the intersection of Commerce Boulevard and Lynwood Boulevard but was subsequently removed to allow for alternate improvements in the area including a gathering space. Discussion also took place regarding the (15) foot sign standard for area identification signs in the B-1 District. Details regarding the Planning Commission's discussion are contained in the January 6, 2003 meeting minute excerpts that have been included as an attachment. -226- PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted 5 to 2 to recommend approval of the variance application subject to conditions including reduced height to (20) feet and reverse cut copy which includes white letters on an opaque / dark backboard. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included as an attachment. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION It is City staff's understanding that the applicant would like the opportunity to discuss the original proposal with members of the City Council including the importance of the current design and height. -227- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A HEIGHT VARIANCE TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF AN AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN AT MOUND MARKETPLACE PID:14-117-24-44-0067 P & Z CASE # 02-41 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mound Marketplace has requested a variance to allow construction of a (25) foot area identification sign near the north entrance located along the west side of Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, area identification signs are limited.to no more than (15) feet in the B- 1 Business District; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat approval for Mound Visions 2nd Addition included a provision which referenced the removal of the clock tower that was planned for the Lynwood Boulevard / Commerce Boulevard intersection to allow for alternate improvements in this area including a water feature; and WHEREAS, the final plat approval for Mound Visions 2nd Addition included the proposed location of the sign which meets the location requirements of the B-1 District; and WHEREAS, the proposed height of the area identification sign is similar to that of the new commercial buildings in the Mound Marketplace complex; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance request at its January 6, 2003 meeting and recommended approval of the request subject to conditions. The height of the area identification sign shall be reduced from (25) feet to (20) feet. -228- Reverse cut copy (white letters on a black and/or dark board) shall be used for the tenant signage. The building permit for the new sign shall not be issued until the variance resolution is recorded at Hennepin County. The variance shall expire after one (1) year unless an extension is granted pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:530, Subd. 2 (E.) Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the City's review of the land use request. The sign materials shall be architecturally compatible with the materials used in the Mound Marketplace project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council does hereby approve the variance request subject to conditions. 2. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Refer to Exhibit A The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 14, 2003 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -229- Excerpts from the MINUTE§ MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 2003 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #02-41 Height variance for area identification sign Mound Marketplace shopping center - Mound Marketplace LLC Mound Marketplace LLC has submitted a variance request to allow construction of a 25 foot area identification side near the north entrance located along the west side of Commerce Boulevard. The height limit for the area is 15 feet. The site includes 67,000 square feet of commercial/retail space and various support facilities including parking areas and landscaping elements. Lan'y Olson, Metro Plains Development - Originally they wanted a definition for the comer. That started as the clock tower. Hennepin County wanted more and more land and wanted the turning radius to be less sharp. So, Metro Plains substituted a water feature. On the CUP approvals the location of the sign was identified. No further design for the sign was provided. Given the sight line from the building on the comer (31 feet tall) to the building by the Pond Arena (21 feet tall), 25 feet for the sign fits right in. Metro Plains is asking for approval of a variance that is basically consistent with what was approved previously. Generally, the Commission felt the backlit sign was not appealing. The original approval was for a clock tower that was viewed as an architectural element not simply a sign post. Chair Michael introduced the concept of reverse cut copy where the tenant names were illuminated on a non- illuminated background. It was felt that was a more acceptable option. Considerable concern was expressed regarding the abandonment of the 15-foot height standard for the area. If the variance were given in this case the standard would not hold for any other property. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Michael (for discussion), to recommend approval of the variance providing they utilize reverse cut copy for the tenant names. Larry Olson felt that reversing the tenant names is a good idea. After much discussion, Brown and Michael rescinded the motion. MOTION by Clapsaddle, seconded by Brown, to recommend tabling the case and asking the applicant to return with another plan considering what was discussed. MOTION failed. Voting for: Clapsaddle, Brown and Hasse. Voting against: Mueller, Glister, Michael, Ayaz. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Clapsaddle, to approve the sign variance with reverse cut copy and a design similar to the clock tower. Clapsaddle withdrew his second. -230- Planning Commission Minutes Hasse seconded and called for the question. January6,2002 Voting in favor of calling the question: Clapsaddle, Brown, Hasse, Glister and Ayaz. Voting against: Mueller and Michael. MOTION failed. Voting in favor: Brown, Hasse Ayaz. Voting against: Glister, Mueller, Clapsaddle and Michael. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Michael, to approve the sign variance not to exceed 20 feet in height designed with reverse cut copy. MOTION carried. Voting for: Michael, Brown, Hasse, Ayaz and Mueller. Voting against: Clapsaddle and Glister. Brown voted for the motion to allow the developer to move forward. 2 -231 - Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: December 23, 2002 SUBJECT: Variance Request - Area Identification Sign OWNER/APPLICANT: Mound Marketplace LLC PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-41 LOCATION: Mound Visions 2nd Addkion PID: 14-117-24-44-0067 ZONING: Destination Unit Planned Development District COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Auto Destination District SUMMARY . Mound Marketplace LLC has submitted a variance request to allow construction of a (25) foot area identification side near the north entrance located along the west side of Commerce Boulevard. The requested variance is described below: . Proposed .Allowed Variance Height (25) ft (15) fr (lO) ft SITE CONDITIONS The subject site includes 67,000 square feet of~ commercial / retail space and 'various support facilities including parking areas and landscaping elements. The Village by the Bay tOwnshouse project is located behind Mound Marketplace between Bellaire and Elm Street. 60--DAY PROCESS The application Was received and deemed to be complete on December 23, 2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. -232- PUBLIC NOTII~ICATIgN All property owners abutting the .subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around January 4, 2003 to inform them of the variance request. DEPARTMENT REVI]gW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: City Engineer John Cameron No objection. Public Works Director Skinner No comments. Parks Director Jim Fackler No comments. Acting Fire ChiefPederson No objections. Building Official Matt Simoneau A building permit is required for the area identification sign including the submittal of any and/or all required supplemental information pursuant to City Code and/or the UBC. Acting Police Chief McKinley No objections. I-[KGi See memorandum from Loren Gordon and Bruce Chamberlain dated December 4, 2002 which has been included as an attachment. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. An amendment to the Conditional Use Permit (CLIP)' for the Mound Marketplace / Village By the Bay project(s) is no,t 'required for the sign. The preliminary plat approval for the Mound Marketplace/Village by thC Bay project(s) included a provision that referenced the removal of the clock tower that was originally proposed for the Lynwood / Commerce intersection area in order to provide for alternate improvements in this area including a gathering' area and landscaping elements. The project and/or site plans approved as part of the final plat included the proposed location of the sign.. The proposed sign location is consistent with the City's earlier approval. ~233- As set forth in the City Code Chapter 465, the maximum height allowed for pylon signs in the B-1 zone is (25) feet. However, the maximum allowed height for area identification signs for a commercial shopping center (hi excess of 20,000 square f~et)is (15) feet. 5. The proposed height of the sign is generally consistent with the rooflines of the new bUildings in the Mound Marketplace project. o The applicant's supplemental narrative responds to a number of the comments received': fi.om Brace Chamberlain regarding the architectural compatibility of the sign with the Mound Marketplace .project as well as the City's design guidelines. In general, Mr.. Chamberlain is satisfied with the proposed modifications however he has suggested that the Planning Commission may wish to discuss whether other alternatives as opposed to backlighting should be considered. This may be a Possible trade-off for the increased height of the sign structure. RECOMI~ENDATION Due to policy issues associated with the sign variance~ City staff is not offering a recommendation at this time. In the event that the Planning Commission supports the request, City staff, would. recommend that the following conditions be considered: 1. The building permit for the new sign shall not be issued until the variance resolution is recorded at HennePin County. 2. The variance shall expire after one (1) year unless an extension is granted pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:530, Subd. 2 (E.) 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the City's review of the land use request. The sign materials shall be architecturally compatible w[ih the materials used in the Mound Marketplace project. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at its Ianuary 14, 2003 meeting in the .event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at its January 6, 2003 meeting. ' -234' 1~/14,~2001 08:47 FA[ g$24720620 city of MOund VARIANCE APPLICATION .Planning Commission Date CItY Council' Date. / 9524?20620 CITY OF I~OUND City Planner City Engineer Public Works l,e/~c),A.'lS~f:[ication Fee: $200.00 ~' DNR "PARKS ? Other SUBJECT Address PROPERTY LEGAL Lot I Block.. ,,~DE$C... .". gUbdivision ,, MOUND VISIONS., 2nd ADDITION PID# 1411.7 24 44 0067 '. Plat# 07578 ' ZONING DIS~ICT R-1 R-lA ~-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B.3 ~ ~:~, .", '. PROPER~ Name .Mo~ ~T ?~,AC~ ~,~.n ...... OWNER .' Address 4969 OLSON M~OR~ ~IG~AY ~hon~ (M) ' , ...... (W)~ (763)545-1672 .(M)~ APPLICANT Name ~w~cE w. OLSON g[~T~a ,.- .. ' ' Address --'-.~.~AN -'- - ' ' ' OWNER) Phone (H). ,(W) ('651)523-!2,46 ,,., , (M)(61.2)747~3728, 1 ,[ ~-Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure br this property? yes. (iX) NO (). If yes,. list date(S) of apPlioaflon, action taken, reSOlutiOn number(s) an~d provide copies of resolutions. . C01vfPLV. TE : [2.o~e{ailed description of proposed construction Or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etC.): 'DURING PLAT AND C.U.P. APPROVALS~ Variance Application Revised 03/20/02. /-'~ ' -235- MOUND pLAN~!!,~jG & /N, Sp /2002 08:47 FAX 9524720620 CITY OF MOUND: [~01B 3. Do the existlr~cj structures comply With all area, hetght, bulk, and setback regulations for tb~ zoning district in wl~bhlt Is located? Yes (X) No(). If no, specify each non~oonformlng use (c=leSCrlbe reason varlanos request, I.e. setback, 10t area, · ~: REQUIRED VARIANCE REQUESTED (or existing) Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Y~rd: '".Rear Yardi Lakeside: (NSEW) (NSEW) (NS W) (NSEW) (NSEW) (NSEW) Street LOt' SiZe: Hardcover. sq fi: , ,sq fi: fL ft.. ,sq fi:' . .sq ff 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (X), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. WhiCh.unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent Its reasonable use for any of the 'uses permitted In that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) to0 small ( ) too Shallow PleaSe describe:' topography drainage shape soil ) exis~ing-~!tuation other, specify Varlanoe Appltce§en Page 2 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -236- =/2002 08:A8 FA~ 952A720620 ,. CITY OF MOUND 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action .of a4Yone having property interests in the Jand .. after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (), if yes, explain; 7. Was the har;dship created by any other man-made cha~ge, such ss the relocation of a road? Yes (), No ( )... If yes, explain: .. Are the conditions of hardship for whtch yo~J request a variance peculiar only to {he property.described in this petitfon?. Yes.( )~ NO ('). If no,'iist some other p~perfles which are similarlY affected? ' 9, Comments: SEE ATTATCHED' LETTER !,certify. that all of the above ~tement;s and the statements 'bontained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith ~are true'~hd 'accurate. ! acknowledge' that I hav~ read all of 1.ha variahce information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises desC~bed in this application by'any authorized" official of the City of'Mound for the purpose of inspecting,' or of posting, maintaining and re~vtng such notices as may be required by law.' ....~ · ' , ~UND MARKET PLA'C.E LLC Owner's Signatu~e ~ ~'~,'T~'~ ,, . Date 11/21/02 Applicant's Signature Date Valance Application Page 3 of 3 Revised 03/20/02 -237- I November 20, 2002 'ET OPLAINS __ METROPLAINS PRC:3PERTIES INC hlETROPL,(IN$ DEVELOPMENT LLC g the 'hca r t l a n t~ Sarah Smith City of Mound '5341 Maywood Road Moand, MN 55364 Dear Sarah, Preliminary plat submissions for Mound Market Place included a clock tower .and tenant signage On.the comer qf.Lynwood and Commerce.. Subsequent Hermepin County street improvements and-the desire of the city to have a gathering space required that the land at the location of the clock tower/sign be a plaza, and a large portion dedicated to Hermepin County, A waterfall' on the comer was substituted as a focal point in tieu of the clock.. The C.U.P. approval included identification of the location of the substitute signage along Commerce, but did not show the heighth and character of th~ sign, as it was separate from the bu/ldlng facades. The signage designed is of similar character and size as the original comer clock tower/ sign or approximately 25 feet in height. It is also appropriate in comparison to the heights of the buildings. The comer building is 32 feet tall. The 4000 square foot building on the northeast comer is 21 feet tall. The 25 foot signage creates a consistent' site line between the two roof heights and accordingly is designed 25 feet tall,.' The base of the sign is of the same rock face as structures in Mound Marketplace.' The top of the sign is of the same type as the shingles on'the roof of Mound Marketplace. The mid,'sign is the same EIFS as on Mound Marketplace: The size of the sign is necessary to provide '6 lines of signage for the.tenants of Mound Marketplace,. which is necessary for the success of the center. We believe that the approval of this variance would be consistent with Previous approvals 'for Mound Marketplace and appropriate in character 'for the center. The design 9f the' pylon sign and eleva.tions of Mound Marketplace ~re attached: Please give me a call (65.1,523-1246) ifI can provide any additional information. f)~awrence W. Olson -238- SPRUCE TREE CENTRE i 1600 UNIVERSITY AVF- · SUITE 212 5~, PAUL I~MNESOTA 55104-3825 651 646 7848 . · FAX 651 646 8947 ! www. mer. roplains.com MOUND MARKETPLACE, LLC 4969 Olson Memorial Highway Golden Valley MN 55422 Sarah $. Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1687 Mound Marketplace Variance - Area Identification Sign Dear Sarah: In response to your December 6, 2002 request for additional information for the Mound Marketplace signage the following is submitted. There were four items 'identified in your letter as being incomplete as it relates to the variance application and therefore submit the four.items for application approval Comment: Please review the plan sheets that were submitted with the application because there appears to be inconsistencies with regard to the dimensions that were provided. Response: Please see attached sheet as provided by the Omaha Neon Sign Company with appropriate dimensions indicated, The previous submission did have inconsistencies in dimensions and we apologize for that. Comment: The sign area appears to be at .the maximum allowed area of 120 square feet, however, the application did not specifically include this information. Please provide any additional information and/or revised plan sheet to verify this information. Response: The comment is correct. 120 square feet is being provided in the tenant information and Mound Marketplace Centre sign portion, Comment: The design and/or architectural issues outlined by Bruce Chamberlain on the attached memorandum should be reviewed and/or addressed to insure consistency with the Mound Marketplace project and the city's design guidelines. Response: Two changes as recommended by the le~er from Bruce Chamberlain and Loren Gordon have been incorporated into the design of the signage. -239- Item #1, the stone base will be identical t.o that of the stone base as provided on the main buildings. This includes the fieldStone character and a cap Stone Where it transitions into the main body archway of the sign. The attached detail as per KKE drawings as used on the main buildings will be the same detail as th~tt which is used on the sign base. Item #2 is in regard to the roof and signage letters. The roof of the sign has been modified to include an overhang and brackets that will be the same as on the main building at the intersection of Lynwood and Commerce. Please see attached detail indicating brackets and overhang on the Omaha Neon Sign Company's attachment. The panels for the prospective tenants is baeklit which we believe is consistent with,the architectural character of the eemer as a whole and addresses the needs of the tenan~ as well as the center in a much more appropriate way than a grouad mounted spotlight shining up. The name 'Mound Marketplace' is done in a .cabinet letter to protect the neon that is present. It will be done as thin as it possibly can be. This design is in the same format that all the tenant signs will be on the face of the building. 4. Comment: The setback from the public right of way needs to be a minimum of 10 feet. Please include this information on the revised plan sheet. Response: The sign is located 10 feet back from the right of way and is located on'the attached site plan, We believe the response to the questions as indicated above are with the overall goals of the Mound Marketplace .and the previous approvals as provided to the project. These revisions and/or clarifications should be a positive response to the questions that had been requeste& We thank you for your cooperation and comments and look forward to the approval of the Mound Marketplace sign. Sincerely, Mound Marketplace Brian Pellowski with attachments PBK Iavestmems Larry Olsoa with attachments MoUnd Marketplace_ Attachments GAmound~ndl~mn variance area identification sign -240- Existing steps 80.3' J 10 ~ 9.5' 6.0' .~.~ 10@9.5' r=3' typ. 10 @ 9.5' 6.0' 4'5 15@9.5' 8.: 8' 8' 8' 8' Un-shaded area= ~ht bituminous except where noted 22 @ 9.5' ~ement perry line Retaining wall see Landscape Plan- H Building is parallel to Lynwood New ~ ~t Curb e a s e__rg_e~. by Cour: EL. 109'- 0"' ALUM. STOREFRONT SEE FLOOR PLAN NOTE: ! J SEE DETAIL 1/A401 FOR TYP LNOTES AND INFORMATION .._..~/0 SILL & F'L. 102'-8" '"F TECHTURE STONE VENEER VOID SPACE (GROUT SOLID) 6" Clvlu w/ REINF. 1 1/2" MTL. FURRING CHANNELS W/ 1 1/2" RIGID INSUL. POLY V.B. 5/8" TYPE -X- GYP. BD. T,/O ._S_LA_B~ ,~' EL. 100'-0';' / -242- 25'-0" 4'-0" i 4'-0" 0'-8" 0'-8" rn ~ 0~=5II = I-- .Z g. Type 6 All buildings, walks, & drives are parallel to Bellaire M. uervlce N. Entrance. O. Existing Ice Arena P. Parking Lot (44 spaces) Q. Guest Parking (39 spaces) 02'-0" Type 6 ed tower 2R 100'-0" 36'-0" P r=91' 7~ Alder Existing steps i / -- to remain ~L -;-- ,J .. 13 @ 9'-6" J 65'-0" II 7'-11 1/2" 175'~0" 1 ~ 7 L 16 @ 9'-6" I Pavement 7.0 Un-shaded area= light bituminous 22 @ 9'-6" I I ~lgnage Retaining 4&5/A2 Sign on ! Signage X co Building is parallel to Lynwoodco 1---' CITY OF MOUND 534.1 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FA~:: (952) 472-0620 WE B: www.cityofmound.com December 6, 2002 Larry Olson IgletroPlains 1600 University Avenue, Suite 212 St. Paul, MN 55104 RE: Variance - Area Identification Sign This letter is in response to variance application that was submitted on or around November 26, 2002 for a proposed area identification sign to be installed for the Mound Marketplace project. Based on review by City staff, you are advised that the variance application has been deemed to be incOmplete due to the following issues: Please review the plan sheets that were submitted with the application because there appears to be inconsistencies with regard to the dimension(s) that were provided. The sign area appears to be at the maximum allowable area of 120 SF however the application did not specifically include this information. Please provide any additional information and/or revise the plan sheet to verify this information. The design and/or architectural issues outlined by Bm'ce Chamberlain on the attached memorandum should be reviewed and/or addressed to ensure consistency with the Mound Marketplace project and the City's design guidelines. 4. The setback from the public right-of-way needs to be a minimum of(10) feet. Please include this information on a revised plan sheet. If you have any questions regarding this letter or would like any additional information, please feel free to contact me at 952-472-3190. Sincerely, ' ",t Community Development Director printed ~*d paper -248- MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. To: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director From: Bruce Chamberlain and Loren Gordon Date: December 4, 2002 Subject: Mound Marketplace freestanding sign application You have asked .for our comments on the above referenced sign application. Our review comments address applicable City Code issues and architectural character items as they relate to the project and the Mound Environmental and Appearance Model. City Code The Mound Marketplace is zoned Destination Planned Unit Development District. Development regulations for the property are guided by the use and bulk standards in Section 3 50.65 2 of the Mound Zoning Regulations and the project's development plan which was approved by Resolution #01-13. Sign regulations for Mound Marketplace are regulated by the Sign Code, City Code Section 365.20 Subd. 5(c). This section provides the opportunity for a freestanding sign to have 15 feet of height and 120 square feet of display area. As a freestanding sign, the ground location must be a minimum of 10 feet from the right-of-way. Although the sign height is noted as 25 feet, the dimensions on the. submitted application are not accurate and a revised plan sheet needs to be provided. The sign area appears to be at the maximum allowable area of 120 square feet, however a revised plan sheet is needed for verification. As stipulated by the Sign Code, a 10 feet setback from Commerce Blvd. is a minimum requirement. .~ The sign proPosal as submitted would require a 10 feet height variance. An amendment to the 'Development Plan is not needed because the City's Sign Code is independent of the Zoning Code and development approvals and provides the regulatory authority. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Mirmesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -249- p. 2 Mound.Marketplace sign review December 4, 2002 Archiieetural Character The project originally suggested a clock tower that doubled as a tenant sign. The tower was an appealing architectural structure and something staff encourages the developer to use as a model for the currently proposed sign-. The following design modifications for the proposed sign are suggested: The sign is suggested to carry through the high quality materials being used in the adjacent buildings. a. In regard to the stone base, staff encourages that the sign include the same capping and drip ledge detail used on the buildings. b. In regard to the roof, staff encourages that the roof include the same overhang and cave bracket details as those used in the corner retail building. The Mound Environmental and Appearance Model discourages the use of back lighting sign panels as is suggested for the tenant panel on the proposed sign. Staff encourages the use of other lighting methods such as recessed directional lights mounted in the roof eaves and/or in-ground up lighting, The lettering suggested for the sign is quite large and blocky. Staff believes is that it may be larger than necessary given the sign's location and sightlines especially given the variance request to move the sign closer to the street. Staff suggests that scaled down lettering will offer a more refined appearance while still accomplishing sign function. If you should have any additional questions, please don't hesitate to. contact us. 123 Nort'~: Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Mirmesota 55401 ¢-250-;~00 Fax (S12).~38-68~8 EXHIBIT C CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #01-12 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF THE MOUND VISIONS !sT ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED AT 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD. P & Z CASE #00-64 WHEREA~, the applicant, MetroPlains Development LLC, have submitted m application for a preliminary plat rifled Mound Visions 1 g~ Addition. The property encompasses approximately 18.97 acres or 826,400 square feet of property locamd on the northwest comer of the intersection of Lynwood Blvd and Com.merce Blvd.; and, WHEREAS, the Prelimin~ plat has been' reviewed under Chapter 462 oft he Minnesota Stat~ Statue and as defined by City Code Se. eden' 330:00. All proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and, WHEREAS, the Prelimimry Plat includes 18.9? acres of land as legally described in Attachment "A" of this Resolution; and, ..... 2~I-IEKEAS, the preliminary plat consists of Lot 1, Biock l'which is proposed for commercial development, Lot 2 Block 1 wkich is proposed for multi-family residential development, Cutters B and C which are proposed for dedication to the City for park purposes, and Outlet A for. parlcing purposes; and, WHEREAS, the preliminary .Plat anticipates that all streets and access' drives will be privately corned and maintained as identified in the development plan; and, WI-IEee, Hennepin County and the City of Mound are currently involved in discussions regarding the redesign of County Road 15 which w/il affect the amount of land dedicated along Commerce and Lynwood Blvd. for fight-of-way pu~p. oses; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission'. on November 15, 2000 and November 27, 2000, held public hearings pursuant to Section 330:00 of the Mound City Code of Ordinances, ~o comider the approval of the'Mound Visions 1gt Addition Preliminary Plat; and, WI-IEREAS,. the Planning Commission recommended Council app"oval of the Mound Visions 1't Addition Preliminary Plat; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,. Minnesota appro~ves the Preliminary Plat in addition to those comained ha SectiOn 330;35 with for · -~---.~[llllI:~5~,-~ems 1't Addition with the following conditions: Rezolution #01-]2 Page 2 of 4 Include additional right,of-way along LynwoOd and Commerce on the :final plat as . requested by Hennepin County and agreed to bY the City of MOund. 2. Thc name of tOWer be remove, d o~ NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FLrR~R RESOLVED by the City Council oftheCity of · Mound, Minnesota approves the Preliminary Plat for the property as legally described as follows: Lots I, 2, 3,.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,' 14, 15, 16 and 17, Lynwold Park, L, ake M]nnetonka, together with vacated P, idgewood Avenue and vacated alley origir~ally delineated and dedicated in said plat of Lynwold Park, Lake Minnetonka. ' Lot lg, Lynwold Park, Lake Minnemnka, except'the North 30 feet thereof. Lots 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 104, 105,. 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 1.11, 112, 113, 114 and 115, Mound. Those parts of Lots 102 and 103, "Mound", which lie Easterly of the East line of the West 200.00 feet of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 14, Township 117 North, Kan, ge 24 West of. the sth PrinCipal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota. That part of Meadow Lane, as delineated and dedicated On the plat of"IViound", and now vacated, which lies Easterly of the West 200.00 feet of the Northeast ¼ of the Southe~tst ¼ of Section 15,.T0wnship 117 North, Range 24 West of thc sth Principal Meridi~ Henaepin County, Min~es'ota, and Westerly of the Southerly extension of the:West line of D6wey Ayenue, now known as Bellaire Lane, as delineated and dedicated in said plat of"M0und". The South ¼ of the northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 14, Township 117 North, Rouge 24 West of the 5t Principal Meridian, Hermepin County, Minnesota, except the West 200.00 feet thereof, also except that part within the plat of"Mound',, and except that part described as follows: · Commencing at the Northeast comer of said South ~ of the Northeast ¼ of the Soufixeast ¼; thence Southerly along the East line of said Southeast ¼, a distance of 225.00 feet; Westerly parallel with the North line of said South ~ of the Northeast ¼ of the Souiheast ¼, to the int~seotion with the southerly extension of the West line of Dewey Avenue, now knoxvn as Bellaire Lane, as delineated and dedicated in the plat of "Mound"; themoo Northerly along said Southerly extension to the North line of said South ~A of the Northeast ¼0£the Southeast ¼, thence Easterly along said North line to the point of beginning. And except that part of said South ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, descriNd as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Northeast ~A of the Southe~ ¼, · distant 225.00 feet Southerly from the Northeast comer of said'SOuth I/: of the Northetst ¼ of the Southeast ¼; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said South' ½ of the Re~olution ~01-12 Page 2 of 4 Northeast ¼ oft he Southeast ¼, a distance of 398-,63 feet; thence Southerly, defleetirtg to th® ief~ 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, .a distance of !58.39 feet; thence East~rly~ deflecting to the left 89 degrees 57 minutes 22 seconds, to said East line of the Nortl~east ¼ of the Southeast ¼; thence Norther!y along· said East l~e to the point of beginning. City Manager shatl be conclusive sho~g COmplianc~ therewith ~ the subdi~d~r and City Officials and shall entitl~ such Plat to be Placed' on record forthwi~'WithoUt further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota Statute chapter 462 and the CitY of Mound COde of Ordiraauces. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember HaUus and seconded by Councilmember Brown, The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:.Hanus: Browa, Mci'scl The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Anderson, Meyer Adopted January 23, 2001. Attest: City Clerk Pa Meisel, Mayor Resolution #01- I 2 Page $ of 4 -253- EXHIBIT E crr or m so unos #o -t3 A RESOLVTION OF TI-IE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY'OP MOU1ND GRANTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL OF."TI-IE VILLAGE BY COOK'S BAY" AND "MOUND MARKETPLACE." BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPROVAL P&Z CASE #00-65 WI-IEREAS, .the applicant, MetroPlains Development, rezoning applications to allow residential and Commercial development .of property on the "Old School" site for clevelopment projects called "'The Village by Cook's Bay" and "Mound Marketplace"; and, WEtEREAS, the proposed development includes 18,97 acres of land that was previously the' Westonka Communi~ Center and ballfields and Westonka High School previously; amd, BrH~REAS, the development plan for the site calls for its development as multiple family residential and a commercial area along with land dedicated for Park land dedication requirements; Vvl:IEREAS, The concept pl~ indicates 59 townhome units and 40 'fiats.' The townhomes will provide a total of 4 parking spaces per unit including 2 indoor and 2 outdoor parldng spaces. Underground parking w/Il be provided for the flats at a ratio of 1 ½ spaces per unit. Aa additional 40 spaces will 'be scattered in bays along the private streets for visitor and guest pm:Icing. All streets within the residential area of the development will be private with a 24 · feet width with no on-Street parking because of the need to allow emergen-¢y access on this narrowed, design; and, WI-IEREAS, as a planned development area, dimensional items such as building setbacks, lot area and width are approved and regulated under a conditional use permit. A Common Interest Community. (CIC) will be established to govern the further re-platting and use of the laud as individual units; and, %rI-IEREAS, four 'big house' flab are shown On the eastern side of the development . along BelIaire Road. The narrative talks absut these units as single level with 4 units per level in these 2 - 3 story buildings. The developer indicates that the market for the fiats would appeal to seniors 'which is a good 'fit' with the n6eds in Mound; and, WEtEREAS} the following standards apply under the conditional use permit for the "The Village by Cook's Bay," '"PARCEL SIZE ~ROPOSED UNiT # Re~olution #01-15 Page l of 8 -254-. DENSITY 8 units/acre "' M~n~ruum Lot Width Not applicable Front Yard Setback ELm Road 60 feet Bellaire 100 feet Side Yard Setbacks As indicated on plato between buildings Rear Yard Setbacks As indicated on plans. from property iines. LAND USE pLAN DOwntown Residential (Medium to High Density Residential ~ 7 + units/acre) S'UBDMSION STREET DESIGN Right-of-way width NA- private streets. Pavement width 24 feet Park Site Dedication 1.89 acres or 10% of total development land area - 18.97 acres "'.GREENSPACE 57.4 percent HARDCOVER 36.2 percent , and Wlfflg~AS, building elevations for the townhomes are provided with the development which also detail material standards to be followed on. building exteriors; and, ~REAS, the landscape plan for the residential portion of the development provides a total of 145 planting units which exceeds the 99 urfit rn~nlmum. Plantings consist of shade, 'ornamental, and coniferous varieties. The park will he planted with 24 shade trees in add. ition to the 9 conifers that will be preserved; and, WI-IEREAS, a total of 1.89 acres, 10 percent of the total site area, will be dedicated to the City as paxldand. Outlots 'B' and 'C' note these lands. Tot lot play equipment will also be provided by the developer and located in Outlot '" C , and, WI-IEREAS, the development proposes 67,000 square feet of commercial space called 'Mound Marketplace.' Anticipated tenants includea grocer, city liquor store, restaurants, and smaller retail shops. The buildings Would be designed to consider the urban context of the dowuatown and the Mound 'Visions plan. Detailed exterior treatments, space relationships, and other design elements are provided in the development submittal which will encourage high quality buildhxg ,and site Resolution #0 l- 13 Page 2 of 8 WI-IEREAS, the following standards apply through the conditional use permit for Mound Mazkctptaca PA_KCEL SIZE 6.7 ac PROPOSED SQ:/ PT. OF 67,00.0 CO/vSMEKCIAL Minimum Lot S~ NA ~mum Lot Wid~ NA Front Y~d Buitd~g fronl~g on L~wood Per dcwlopmont pl~ Build~g ~ont~g on Commerce Side Y~d Setbacks- Build~g ~on~g on L~wood Per dewlopmcnt pl~ Worn buH~g ~e~ Yard Setbacks Per dewlopmcnt pl~ L~ USE PLAN De~afion Dis~ioi' SUBD~S~ON Sr~E~ DESIGN S~ccts~ves All pfivge access P~O 337 spaces provided Code requ~cs 446 spaces 9 ~ feot by 18 fe~t stall Code r~quir, s 10 fe~t d~cns~on by 20 feet ~CO~R 92 percent WPIE~, the landscape plan for the commercial portion of the development provides a total of 95 planting units which 'exceeds the 67 planting unit mimimum.'Plantings consist of shade, ornamental, and coniferOUs varieties. Screening and buffering of the parking and dock areas are provided to minhuhe impacts on the adjacent single family neighborhood; and, WI-IEREAS, a total of 313 parking spaces are shown plus 24 spaces adjacent to thc Pond Arena which is a ratio of 1 space for ev~7 '197 square feet of commercial door area~ CitY Code requires 1 space for every 150 square fe~ of commercial floor area or 446 spaces requiring a variance of 109 spaces; and, ' ' WI-IEREAS, the City and County are currendy reviewing plans for the relocation and upgrade of County Koad.I 5 and the intersection of County Road 110. The results of Ike study are not yet con~plete, but will take. into comidemtion the access locations proposed by the development plan. In reviewing the development, the City has considered traffic, circulation and oth~r aspects of thc proposed project as it might affect public heaIth, safety or welfare and imposed conditions upon thc approval addressing .those considerations; and, Re~olution #01.15 Page $ ......... .... WI'tEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have studied the pra~'ticability of the residential and commercial planned developments, variances, taking into consicleration the requirements of the City, giving particular attention to the arrangement and location o £ the street, their relation to topographer, water supply, sewage disposal, drainage, building arrangements, the present and future development of adjoining lands and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan and other official controls; and, WHEREAS, the physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type and density Of developmem contemplated subject to the conditions imposed herein, and ~he proposed subdivision as conditioned is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing land use in th.e are~ and, WHEREAS, said plat is in ali respects consistent with the City plmi and the regulations and the requirements of the laws of the State of M~nnesota and the City Code of Ordinances of the City of Mound. WI-IEREAS,' at the Planning Commission has recommended City Council approval of the conditional use permit for the information as contained in the development plans; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City' of Mound, Minnesota: Approves a Conditional Use' Permit for the "The Village by Cook's Bay" and "hiound Marketplace" with the following conditions: Relocate parking.spaces along the rear of the grocery store to areas close to the clubhouse. A pedestrian easement between building facades along Lynwood and Commerce right, of-ways be provided. 3. Easements for recreation and maintenance of the multi-use trail system. 4. Indicate how private streets will be lighted. ,. Developer work with the City in developing a streetscape along Commerce and · Lynwood to address landscaping, fagade, and other improvemems complementary to the. development of the Mound Visions Plan. All streets within the proposed development.shall be private streets serving the residential area shall be 24 feet wide, measured from back of cm'b to b~.ck of curb. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed on all streets, drives and parking areas in both the commercial and residential areas. 7. Applicant provide fireflow analysis prior to the completion of the final atility, plans. Resolution #01-15 1'age 4 of 8 -257- The final Plat shall include utility e~sements for thc new sanitary sewer and watermalns which Mil be public utilities. The final plat must also inc]~tde utility easements for the existing public utilities which will rema~ in place. Approval of fight, of-way and access drives by ~ermepln County and oon-s[stent with final plat approval. 10. Approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. 11. 12. 13. Prior to the City releasing the final plat, the Developer shall sin a development contract with the City. The development contract shall stipulate that construction of all public improvements covered by said contract shall be completed witl~u 280 days of the City releasing the final plat As part of. the development contract, the Developer shall furnish the City with a perfOrmance bond or au irrevocable letter of credit or other form of Security approved by the City Attorney in the mount of 125% of. estimated construction costs as per plans approved by thc CiTM EngLueer. The Developer shall secure and provide copies to the City's Building Official of all reviews and required permits from the Minnesota Department Of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, or any other applicable permits, prior to beginning construcfion~ The Building Official will not authorize construction until permits are secured. 14. The City Attorney shall examine title to the property and shall render a title opinion to the city showing the ownership status of the property prior to filing. The applicant shall provide thc City Attorney a current abstract or register' of property abstract for Langdon Bay. 15. Prior to any occupancy the applicant shall secure Certificates of Occupancy from the Building Official. Certificates will not be issued for homes in the subdivision until utilities and access servicing the homes arc approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Superintendent, and Building Official. 16. Developer will reimburse the City for legal, engineering and ptarming costs incurred for review and approval of these plans. B. APproves variances as follows: 200 Square feet ratio plus a reduction of 23 spaces. Resolution Page 5 of 8 A variance is approved to allow the commercial parking spaces to meet 1 space per -258- variance is approved to allow the connnercial parking spaces to be d~signed at 9 feet width and a 60 feet 6 inch isle separation. 3. A hardcover variance of 62% is approved for "Mound Marketplace.'' The City Council adopts the following findings in support of the appro~ved variances: The property has long served the parking needs of surrounding uses and will likely continue to do so. The partdng space milo and Size are consistent with current retail indUStry- design and other metropolitan community code requirements, : The smaller parldng space size reduces the mount of hardcover tMt would be incurred by the typical zoning requirements, The residential and commercial portions Of the.proj eot will utilize a central pond for stormwater management.. The total hardcover for the project is 64%, which is below typical hardcover thresholds of 75% in the downtown. C. The resolution is adopted for the property legally described as: Lots t, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, .14, 15, 16 and 17, Lynwold Park, Lake Minnetonka, together with vacated Ridgewood Avenue and vacated alley originally delineated and dedicated in said plat of Lynwold Park, Lake Mirmetonka. Lot 18, Lynwold Park, Lake Minnetonka, except the North 3.0 feet thereof. Lots 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97,98, 99, 100, 101, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 1-10, 1tl, 112, 113, 114 and t15, Mound. Those parts ~fLots 102 and 103, "Mound", which lie Easterly of the East line of the West 200.00 feet of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 14, Township 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hermepin County, Minnesota. That part of Meadow Lane, as delineated and dedicated' on the plat of "Mound", and now vaca~d, which lies Easterly of the West 200.00 feet of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 15, T0wrmhip 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin Cou~nty, Minnesota., and Westerly of the Southerly .extension of the West line of Dewey · Avenue, now known as Bellaire Lane, as delineated and dedicated in said plat of"Mound", Tho South ¼ of the northeast t/~ of the Southeast ~A of Section 14, Township 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5t Principal Meridian, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the Vv'est 20.0. O0 feet thereof, also except that part within the plat of "Mound", and except thatpart described as follows: Re~olufion ~}1-15 . Page 6 of 8 -259- Commencing at the Northeast comer of said South ~A of the Northeast ¼ of the South. east ~A; thence Southerly along the East l~e of said Southeast IA, a distance of 225.00 Westerly parallel with the North tine of said South ~ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, m the intersection with the southerly extension of the West line of Dewey Avenue, x~ow known as Bellaire Lane, as delineated and dedicated in the plat of "Mound"; thence Northerly along said Soufl~erly extension to the North line of said South ½ of the Nort~e%t ¼ of the Southeast ¼, thence Easterly along said North line to the point of beginning. And except that part of said South ~A of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, described as follows: Begirming at a point on the East line of said Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, distant 225.00 feet Southerly from the Northeast comer of said 8outh ~A of the Northeast ¼ of the Soutlaeast ¼; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said South V~ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, a distance of 398.63 feet; thence Southerly, deflectir~g to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 158.39 'feet; ~ence Easterly, deflecting to the left 89 degrees 57 minutes 22 seconds, to said East line of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼; thence Northerly along said East line to the point of beginning. Legal Description: Lots 19 mud 20 Lynwold Park Lake Minnetonka The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Haaus and seconded by Cotmcilmember Brown. The following Cotmcilmembers voted'in the alfa'native: Hanus, Brow-n, Meisel · The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Anderson, Meyer Adopted January 23, 2001 Pat Meisel, Mayor .City Clerk Resolution t~01. I $ Page 7 0£8 CERTI.FICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and the Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1. As such officer; I have the legal custody of the original record from which ' the attached and forgoing extract, was tmnscribed~ 2. I have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. I find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the original minutes of a meeting of. the City Council of said City held of the date indicted in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 01-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE MOUND VISIONS 2NI~ ADDITION FINAL PLAT LOCATED AT 6600 LYNWOOD BLVD. CASE #01.-41 Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on October 9, 2001. WITNESS my hand officially as such Olerk, and. the seal of said City, this day of October, 20(3.1. -261 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #01-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY O-F MOUND GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE MOUND VISIONS 2"D ADDITION FINAL PLAT LOCATED AT 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD. CASE #01-41 WHEREAS, the applicant, The Village by Cook's Bay LLC and Mound Marketplace LLC, have submitted an-application for a final plat ti*tied Mound Visions 2"d Addition in the manner requ red for platting of land under the City of Mound' Ordinance Code, Section 330.00 and under Chapte'r~ 462 of the Minnesota State Statue and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and, WHEREAS, the property encompasses appro×imately 18.97 acres or 826,400 square feet. of proper~y located on the no~,thwest comer ef the intersection of Lynwood Blvd and Commerce Blvd. as legally described in Attachment "A" of this Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the final plat consists of Lot 1, Block 1 which is proposed for commercial development,. Let I Blocks 2 through 1,5, whi~.h is l~reposed for mult. i~famity residential development, Outlet A for parking purposes, Outlets B and C for dedie, ation to the City for park land, Out. lot D for. common open spa.ce and sto~mwater pOn¢ting, Outlets E, F, H, and. I for common open space, Out, lot G for private streets; and, WHEREAS, the final pi.at dedicates land for public road right-of-way purposes along Lynwoe~d BtVd, (County Road 110) and C°rrimeme Bivd. ('County Road 15) as shown on the plat; and, -2'62- Resolution Ho. 01-.88 WHEREAS, all streets and access drives will be privately owned and maintained as identified in the development plan; and, WHEREAS, City Staff has reviewed the final plat and determined it is consistent with the preliminary plat and conditions contained within 'as well as the approved development plans for The Village by Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace; and, WHEREAS,. the City Council reviewed, the final plat at its October 9, 2001 meeting and determined it is consistent with the preliminary plat; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that the Final Plat for Mound Visions 2"d Addition is. hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. City Staff review and approval of easement documentation for public trails shown in the development plan. 2. City Staff review and approval of easement documentation for that portion of the public alley extending within the plat area. 3. City Staff review and approval Of easement documentation for access over the private road extending from Lynwood Blvd. to Outlot "G". 4. City Staff review and approval of all drainage and utility easement documentation for the final plat. 5. Comply with all conditions contained in the City Engineer's Memo dated October 4, 2001. BE IT RESOLVED that such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Manager shall be conclusive showing compliance therewith by the subdivider and City Officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota Statute Chapter 462 and the City of Mound Code of Ordinances. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councitmember Hanus and seconded by Councilmember' Brown. -263- Resolution No. 01 The following Council.members voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus and Meisel The folloWing Councilmembers voted in the negative: Anderson and Meyer Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of October, 2001. SS/Pat Meisel Mayor, Pat Meisel SS/Bonnie Ritter Attest: Acting City Clerk THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -265- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (9.52) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 8, 2003 SUBJECT: Minor subdivision and variance of Lots 1 & 2, Block 11, Shadywood Point APPLICANT: Brenshell Homes / Mark Lee PID: 18-117-23-23-0066 PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 03-02 / 03-03 LOCATION: 1975 Lakeside Lane ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential REQUEST At its January 6, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request from Brenshell Homes (on behalf of Mark Lee) for a minor subdivision of the property located at 1975 Lakeside Lane in order to create two (2) lots. The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a (10) foot front setback from Beachside Place which is an unimproved public right-of-way located immediately adjacent to the east parcel (Lot 1.) According to the R-1 District requirements, a front yard setback of (30) feet is required. PROJECT DETAILS Details regarding the variance application are contained in Planning Report No. 03-02 / 03-03. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the minor subdivision and variance application(s) as requested subject to conditions. Members of the Planning Commission stated that a front yard variance of (20) feet was reasonable because Beachside Place is an unimproved street that basically functions as a fire lane. Additionally, the reduced setback does not affect vehicular sight lines. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included as an attachment. -266- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Members of the City Council are advised the applicant would like the opportunity to discuss the utility trunk and connection charges for the subject property as the existing parcel includes two (2) original platted lots that were combined by a former owner. -267- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND (20) FOOT FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR TIlE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1975 LAKESIDE LANE P & Z CASE # 03-02 AND # 03-03 WHEREAS, the applicants, Brenshell Homes and Mark Lee, have requested a minor subdivision to subdivide the property located at 1975 Lakeside Lane to create two (2) lots; and WIIEREAS, the minor subdivision also requires a (20) foot front yard setback variance from Beachside Place which is an unimproved public right of way; and WHEREAS, the property is located within the R-1 Single Family Residential District and subject to City Code Chapter 350:620; and WIIEREAS, minor subdivisions are regulated by City Code Chapter 330:20 Subd. 1 (A); and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the lot area, width and setback requirements of the R-1 District with the exception of the front yard setback of (30) feet from Beachside Place, which is unimproved, therefore a variance has been requested; and WIIEREAS, the existing parcel located at 1975 Lakeside Lane include two (2) platted lots that were legally combined by a previous owner; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision generally follows the original lot lines with the new lot line shifting slightly to the east; and -268- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its January 6, 2003 meeting and unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the minor subdivision and variance as requested by the applicant and as recommended for approval by Staff', and WHEREAS, in making its recommendation for approval, the Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. A front yard variance of(20) feet was reasonable because Beachside Place is an unimproved right-of-way that functions as a fire lane and will not be developed; and B. A front setback of(10) from Beachside Place will not affect vehicular sight lines NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council does hereby approve the Minor Subdivision and Variance request with the following conditions: A. Hardcover surface coverage on the proposed new lots shall not exceed thirty (30) percent. B. All comments from the City Engineer and Public Works Director. C. Payment of one (1) park dedication fee and any and/or all municipal utility trunk and connection fees and deficient street assessment charges. 2. This minor subdivision and variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Refer to Exhibit A The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 14, 2003 Pat Meisel, Mayor -269- Excerpts from the MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 6, 2003 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #03-02/03-03Minor Subdivision/Variance 1975 Lakeside Lane Brenshell Homes/Mark Lee MOTION by Brown, seconded by Clapsaddle, to approve staff recommendation. Findings of Fact: The sideyard variance of 20 feet was reasonable because it is an unimproved street that acts like a fire lane. It doesn't affect any traffic sight line and will never be built on. As a non-lot of record, the hardcover cannot exceed 30 percent. MOTION carded unanimously -270- 5341 lVmywood Road Mound, MN 55364 · (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff' FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: December 23, 2002 SUBJECT: Minor subdivision and variance of Lots 1 & 2, Block 11, Shadywood Point APPLICANT: Brenshell Homes / Mark Lee PID: 18-117-23-23-0066 PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 03-02 / 03-03 LOCATION: 1975 Lakeside Lane ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential COM?REItENSIVE PLAN: Residential REQUEST The applicant, Brenshell Homes (on behalf of Mark Lee), is requesting approval of a minor subdivision of the property located at 1975 Lakeside Lane in order to create two (2) lots. The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a (10) foot front setback from Beachside Place which is an unimproved public right-of-way located immediately adjacent to the east parcel (Lot 1.) SUBDIVISION PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 330.20 outlines the classifications of subdivisions in the City of Mound and states that any division of land that is subject to the subdivision regulations shall be considered either a major subdivision or a minor subdivision. As set forth in City Code Chapter 330:20 Subd. 1, the following is considered to be a minor subdivision: Any subdivision of land creating not more than three (3) residential lots which shall conform to the following: 1. Have frontage on an existing public road. 2. Not require the construction of any new public facilities or public improvements. 3. There shall be no adverse effect on remaining or adjoining property. 4. There shall be no conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance or Official Map. -271 - EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject property is located at the intersection of Lakeside Lane and Beachside Place. Beachside Place is an unimproved public right-of~way but is currently used as a neighborhood park and provides public access to Lake Minnetonka. Presently, there is an existing single-family home located on the west parcel (Lot 2) and a detached garage on the east parcel (Lot 1.) It is anticipated that the existing house and garage will be demolished and (2) new residential dwellings will be constructed. The applicant has demonstrated building pads on both lots however it is City staff's understanding that detailed house plans have not yet been developed. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire ChiefPederson No objections. Acting Police Chief McKinley No police issues. Public Works Director Skinner If Lot 1 has a driveway apron installed they may have to change the catch basin casting. The water shut-off value in Lot 2 will need to be relocated out of the driveway. Acting Fire Chief Pederson No fire issues. City Engineer Cameron Refer to memorandum which has been included as a separate attachment. Parks Director Fackler No review needed from DCAC or POSAC. The applicant and future owners should be made aware that private encroachments in the Beachside Place ROW are not allowed without City approval. -272- Zoning. The subject property is zoned R-1 single family residential. The following table includes the lot area, width and setback requirements of the R-1 District: Lot Area Width Depth Front Side Lake Setback , Setback Setback(s) R-1 10,000 SF 60 FT 80 FT 30 FT 10 FT / 30 FT 50 FT Lot 1 12,640 SF 68 FT 159 FT 30 FT i0 FT / 10 FT* 50 FT Lot 2 13,550 SF 60 FT 208 FT 30 FT 10 FT / 10 FT 50 FT Applicant Is requestin~ :a vananc, to allow a front setback of (i0) feet from Beachside Place for Lot I. Due to comer lot reqmrcmcnts, this lot is subject to double front yard setbacks of (30) feet on both Lakeside Lane and Beachside Place. Non-Lot of Record Status. In the event the minor subdivision request is approved, the subject property will lose its "lot of record" status and therefore will be subject to the standard provisions of the R-1 zoning district including hardcover not exceeding (30) percent for each of the proposed lots. NOTIFICATION While City Code does not require public notification, current City policy indicates that adjacent property owners are notified as a courtesy. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that a copy of the January 6, 2003 meeting agenda was forwarded to the adjacent property owners on or around January 3, 2003. DISCUSSION POINTS The subject property is bordered by Lakeside Lane to the North and Beachside Place to the east. Beachside Place is presently unimproved and generally serves as a park and public access to Lake Minnetonka which is located immedhtely behind the subject parcel(s). The property includes two platted lots which were legally combined by a previous owner. The proposed subdivision generally follows the original lot lines but the proposed division line has been shifted slightly to the east. 3. Effective September 2001, lot size is now calculated to the 929.4 elevation in the City of Mound. Previously, it was measured to the 931.0 (lO0-year floodplain) elevation. Portions of the subject property are located below the 931.00 elevation and are therefore located in the floodplain. Effective August 2002, the City of Mound is responsible for wetland and floodplain management within the City's corporate limits including the placement of fill. City Code Chapter 300.13, Subd 4 (b) states that the placement of fill in the flood fringe shall result in a "no-net decrease" in 100-year flood storage. -273- Any future structure(s) will need to meet the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) of 933. Strict application of the setback requirements of the K-1 district on Lot 1 creates a buildable pad of approximately of 25 feet x 120 feet. If the minor subdivision is approved, the property will lose "lot of record" status and therefore will be subject to the standard zoning requirements of the K-1 District. Specifically, side yard setbacks are increased to (10) feet and hard surface coverage will be limited to no more than thirty (30) percent as set forth in City Code chapter 350:1225. In the event the subdivision is approved, any newly-created lot will be subject to a park dedication fee. Additionally, trunk area water and sewer charges, utility connection fees and/or street improvement assessments may also be applicable. As mentioned previously, there is currently a single-family dwelling located on Lot 1 therefore it is anticipated that one (1) additional charge will be assessed in the event the minor subdivision is approved. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the proposed minor subdivision and variance application(s.) At a minimum, City staff recommends that the following list of minimum conditions be included: 1. Hardcover surface coverage on the proposed new lots shall not exceed thirty (30) percent. 2. The request shall be made subject to any forthcoming comments from City staff. 3. All comments from the City Engineer. 4. Payment of (1) park dedication fee and any and/or all municipal utilities trunk and connection fees and deficient street assessment charges. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is received, it is anticipated that the request will be forwarded to its January 14, 2002 meeting. The applicant is advised that the January 14, 2002 date is tentative at this time. -27'4- City of Mound MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Panning Commission Date: C~ Council City Planner Public WoWs City Engineer Application Fee: $ 250. Escrow DNR Def~e~ UnE Ch~ges? Pa~ D~inq~nt Tax~? ~ V~ R~u~? Please type or print ~ING DEffiCRIPTION Zo me DIST~ ~: (if other than a~ti~t) ~d~,, Pho~ (H) Has an ,a~ication ever been made for zoning, vaflaru:e, condltlona~ use permit, or other zoning procedure for this ~roperty? ( ) yes./(X),.no, if ym~, list date(s) of app~icaflon, actlo~ taken, resolution number(s~ and provide copies of resolutions.. Appiica6on must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that att of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. ! ~ that I have read all of t~ ~on provided and that I am responsible for all costs Incurred by the City related to the pror, essing of t.his application. I consent to the ent~ in or upon the premises described in Ibis applicslion by any authorized official of fh~City of Mound for lhe purpose of inspecting, orof posting, maintaining and remov_.,,~,g such notices as may be required by law. /z_- ?. -. Applicar~ Sign~ture~ ~) Date Owner's Signature Date Minor Sub~ Appacat~ l~,dse~ 03/26/02 City of Mound VARIANCE APPLICATION Planning Commission Date City Council Date Application F~e: $290.00 City Planner DNR City Engineer PARKS Public Works Other Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address PROPERTY Phone (H) ~AN Address 1. Has an application ever been r~a.de for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No g<~. if yes, list date(s} of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Application Pl~gel I of 3 -276- 3. Do the existing sting-tums comply ~l,tl~ all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the ~.oning district In which it is located? Yes {(x~) No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (desc:~ibe mason for varian0e request, i.e. setbac~ lot'ama, etc,): . S~B.ACKS: REQU IRED REQUESTED VARIANCE Front Yard: ( N $.E W ) ~) ft. '~ C) ft. O ft. sicte Yard: (NSEW) . I D ft. ~ O fL (~ ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ~ fi, 1 1~ ft. J' C> ft, Rear Yard: (NSEW) ff. ft, ff. Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ~ .~ .......ft. ~ C) ft, O ft, : (NSEW) ff. · ft. Street Frontage: ff. ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft .sq ft SCl. ft Hardcove~. sq ft sq ff sci ff 4. Does the preseflt~ of the:property conform to alt regulations for ~ zoning district in which it. is located? Yes/~, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use. 5. Which unique pITys, ical characteristics of the.subject properbj prevent its reasonable, use for arty of the uses permitted in that zoning district? /~narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil small ( ) drainage ( ) ex]sang situation ( )too ( )shape ( )other. spec Variance Application Page 2 of 3 Revlaed 03/26/02 -277- Was the hardshil~ descried abOve a-sated by the aotl°n of a~ny})ne haVing ~r°pe~ interests in ~ land after the zoning ordinance was. adopted (1982)? Yes (), Ho//~~ i! Yes; ~lain: 7. Was the harc~h)p created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a.road? Yes ( }, No/~). If yes, explain: B. Are the conditions of hardsl~p,for which you'request a variance peculiar only to the property' described in this. petition? Ye~ (), No ~. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affectecl? g. Comments: Owner's Signore : Applicant's Slgnatu~~m~----~ ~' i certify that all of ~e a~e ~tements and the sta~en~ contained ~n any reqUired papers or- p{ans to be submitted hemq~tith am ~ arid aCmmte. I acknowl~lg~ ~at i have mad all oftheYarhance information provid~;~ I consefit ~t~in oru%n ~ premi~ de~ed :in this, application by any au~orized offiolal of the Ck¥ of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, OF of posting; ~ln~i:hin~ ~nd removing such : Date ~/ariance Application Page 3 of 3 Revised 03V2W02 -278- December 24, 2002 Mayor Pat Meisel Mound City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Avenue . Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: 1975 Lakeside Lane, Mound Dear Sarah, We offer the following information for consideration for the variance request for the above address. We note tlmt the existing conditions are as follows: · The site is currently one parcel of 26,250 square feet area or 0.6 acres · Prior to a lot combination tlmt was done to meet old buildable area requirements (931.0, changed 10/2002 approx.), the parcel was 2 separate lots · One lot compiled with current ordimmces, one did not · We note that the parcel is adjacent to Beachside Place, a. City Park mad dedicated ROW · Beachside is tmlikely to ever be used as a ROW, it is a street stub wlfich ends in Lake Mime?tonka here · In other locations in the City., Lots adjacent to City Parks are not subject to excessive setbacks. · Prior to giving up Lot of Record Status, this lot would have a 6 foot Side Yard setback on one side of the Lot Following Subdivision the conditions would be: Subdivision will create two complying lots · Both created lots will be required to individually meet a 30% Hardcover maximum · The West Lot will require no variances · We are asking to be granted variance to a 10 foot sir?yard for the East Lot against Beachside Park The ofl~er side yard would be 10 foot · Without a variance the home pad would be 25 feet wide, this would require a home design that would be predominm~tly a garage facing Lakeside Lane · With the variance, the home pad would be 45 feet wide allowing a home design that would be more balanced between house and garage · No other variances are requested We wish to point out to the City, Brenshell Development and Fine Line Design group's lfistory of providing appropriately priced, neighborhood sensitive home products available to residents of the City of Mound. We hope to make these two residences the next benefit from us to the City and people of Mound. Sincerely, St?yen K. Belmke, President -~79- . ~ X . ~ ~ ~ I/~'~ m ~ ~ ~ x x ~ 0 - > z ~ ~ z m m II 0 Z < z ~ c'O~" II ~zo~ " ~° > ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ m 0 o 0 ~ > _ g ~ d o ~ z ~ z~ ~ > z 0 0 Z PROJECT NO. BOOK OATE NOV.26, 2002 ~o~ L 0 Y ~/V/S/ON Land REVISIONS .[REBY CERTIFY THaT T~IS S~VEY WAS PREPARED ~~ ~. ~~e~J~ ~rve~or BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND ~ND~ T,~ LAWS Or T~ STA~ O~ ~N~SOT~. 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, ~AN~ ~. O~gAR~LL~ ~. NO. ~SO~ .. r ME M 0 R A ND UM DATE: January 2, 2003 TO: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director FROM: John Cameron, City Engineer SUBJECT: City of Mound Minor Subdivision and Variance Request - Brenshell/Lee Case #03-02 & 03 MFRA #14146 As requested, we have reviewed the Brenshell/Lee Minor Subdivision request and have the following comments and recommendations: Comments General The proposed minor subdivision would redivide this parcel very close to the original lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 11, Shadywood Point. It appears that the proposed parcels meet all City requirements, except for the proposed setback to Beachside Lane, for which a variance has been requested. The platted right-of-way for Beachside Lane is unimproved and is used as a park and non- vehicular access to the lake. Grading and Drainage The survey submitted with the application shows only a building envelope. A complete grading and drainage plan will need to be submitted when applications are made for building permits. The 100- year flood elevation of 931.0 is shown outside the building envelope and will need to be excluded from any filling activities during construction. Utilities The City's record plans indicate that both parcels are served by existing sewer and water services. -281 - Ms. Sarah Smith January 2, 2003 Page 2 Miscellaneous' The original platted lots did not provide drainage easements along the lot lines. Drainage and utility easements along all new lot lines should be required as a condition of the minor subdivision. Recent revisions to the City Code requires that sanitary sewer and watermain area trunk charges in addition to the connection fees must be paid when new building sites are created. The present area trunk charges are $1,500 each for sewer and water and a connection fee of $240 each for sewer and water for the new parcel created by the minor subdivision. Recommendations 1. Final grading and drainage plan to be approved by the City Engineer at time of building permit application. 2. Provide drainage and utility easements along all new lot lines, five feet wide on the side lot lines and ten feet in width along the street sides. 3. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Area Trunk charges of $1,500 each shall be paid when building permit application is made for the southerly parcel. s:kmain:\mou 14146\correspondenceksmith l-2 -282- I P.r. operty Information ~earch by Property.D Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: Pr.opert~ ID Property ID: Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web databa,~e g~ updated daffy g4onday - Friday) at approximately 9:15 p. in, (CST) Property. ID: Address: ' Municipality: School Dist:' Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2002 ::<~..'¢,~.,~ ~,~',,le ;:~.: . ...: ............. ,...,.~, ~ 8-a a 7-23-23-00~ 197S LAKESIDE LA MOUND 277 Construction year: 1974 3 Parcel Size: NE145X210X LUTH CH-MIS SYNOD FDTN TRS LUTH CH-MIS SYNOD FOUNDA, TION 1333 S KIRKWOOD RD ST LOUIS MO 63122 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value ar warranted to represent arms-length transactions, NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description SHADYWOOD POINT LOTS 1 AND 2 BLK 11 SHADYWOOD POINT Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value; Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: - $348,000 $278,600 $278,600 $4,748.10 $53.10 $4,801.20 http://www2, co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/15idresult.jsp ,, -283- 12/4/2002 Property Information Search by Property' ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Property Information Detail for Taxes payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of Jarnuary 2, 2001 Values: Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status 1159 $346,500 $1,500 $348,000 $277,4OO $1,200 $278,6OO SEASONAL- RESIDENTIAL REC NON- HOMESTEAD Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or w~sh to c Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don.Kopel(~co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce apptica' Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http://www2, co. hennepin, mn. us/pins/pidresu lt..! "_' 284- 12/4/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 ':[::':~!!2!!3!:':::!¢~:ii'~L!!?:!::::::i'F:~:~%. ::.:::::.,~ ...: :':::2::: ':'::'!! ""' ' Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Property ID Last update: 12/03/'2002 at h00:00 PM Approximate PropertyApproximte Property Perimeter Area 18-117-23-23-0066 740 ft. 2_,___~R~R sq.ft. 0.681 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2002) 1975 LAKESIDE LA $ 348,000 $ 4,801.20 MOUND, MN 55364 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin ~ounty does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are ~ound, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepln County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at Bob. Moulder@¢o.hennepin.mt%us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin County http://ww'wl 9.co.henne.../esrimap.dll?name=Henne?;:~,2,:md=Find&VALUF.=181172323006 12/4/2002 -2 5- 10/22/02 TUE 14:24 FAX 612 888 5752 }lark P. Lee {~002 ?. 004 Mr. Wa)ne Sell 1333 S. K~kwood, Rood St, Louis, MO 63122 Phone: At your .rsquesL we have conductS1 ' :'"~:? ~fl ~om on yow s~ ~ ~ locai~ you :~wif~& ~ follx~g ~ a mbffi~on of ~ ~ yo~ sit~: 1975 Lak~ide ~ .~ ~ ~..m~.~: ~ .~,-s .~...~ooa~:, ..... Cem~r oz'Lakosk1~ Lane ~I00 -286- I,,~o..16,1. ~003 ?. STANDARD CAUTIONS & LIMITATIONS: Worma.~re ~e depth of ~y ~ ~i~ ~ oomple~on olt~ bongs. We do ~ m~i~ ~ bo~:a~. v~u~ ~e ~/er Weis ~d r~id flow ofw~cr into ~ bo~ ~di~.~ ~ file :r:~t~ might be ov~e.d M s~ ~ils. Slow inflows~y t~be r~l ~ ~t ~o~ wg~ lev~. su~e~ible ~p p~ ~ll ~p ma~ ~law ~ ~p~os ~, ,md ah~ld b:~ a Of uecessity, th~ area oI: the borings in rela6on ~0 the ares o£~ si,:,~ and The d=pth of th~ borMl~ arc limited. Suggestio~s and r:commcndafior~ t,ffl'ds report are opinioms brad an ~l~:a' obra/n~ ~,'om rbe borings. I hereby c~t~fy ~a~ i~ re. port was prepared byn:= or tmdc~ m.v d.ir,~ct superuis.on and that I ,ma duly P~istered profm~onal Eng ~ trader the La, vs o£the ST~r¢ of ADVANC]~ SURVEYING & ENG]I~BRING (:0. James H. Parker P.E: & 1).S., Nc;.'~, Presidem -287- 10122/02 /%~ 14:15 FAX 612 855 5752 Mark F. Lee 1~."1~.,~ 13~':-~~-' ~I~ ~ O~~ * 4~1g' OCT,-,I6' Oil~Dl 10:29 ~MS FOUMDATION TEL;314 995 t132 361 949 ~2{')9 ~004 ~'.~ P. 00~ l~x~,Co~ "· o~z,~o '# ' ' .__ :ATORY SO~L s ~ ti,u{v,a.TJ~;m{ DF. SCJiIPTION 89 i St~ ~.y sandy clay (C~k sem,e g~vel _J -288- ~a~ ~. ~ee TEL:3t4 996 1152 NO. 1G1 ~ oo5 P. 0212~9 'W-I~'NOqT~ ~/A.'P~E travEL Db."rK.~1~.t) ~, r (~OIVL~LEiION 0.,' BOltING. MAY ~t~E t (,I,~DF,).q. 'N- ~'~gARD PEN£Z'EA'I'JON T'~.'~. ~LOW COUNT (NOT INC ',UDED r~ k-x/~Olt AT( ~y BOR/NO~) -289- 10/22/02 'I~.TE 14:26 F3X 612 888 5752 ,~a~k p. Lee OC~.-1,6' 02(~D) 10:29 LC~5 'PO~AT[O~ Oct t50~ 03:~p 3a~ew H. P~rk~r ~006 P. o07 (SP} (oc.) (s~ (OH) '~) -290- OCT, 1132 ~007 10/22/02 ~ 11:26 F..~X 612 888 5752 )lark P. ~e O~T "I'6' OZf~DJ 10:28 LC~ 161 ~008 P. REI20~NDATIONS: Thc firm gte. y-brown sandy olay oncounteo:e.d in r. he borin~ $ fcc; below Lak~sxdc Lane are suir~bl; for the support of i. ~. It is our opi_n_ion lhat th/s soil is c~oable of supporting /'oofinSs , proportioned to limit bearing pressure tp nc, more thitn 2000 pounds per square foot. The .soft so. ils encount, gr~t in the e.bove tSal level !~hall be. remoVed from thc am& of the ~r¢ b.v cxc/:vahon. Because of the high wa~cr le'vel detected k~ thc bo~'tSs, a $1~ct'ur~ w/thout a basement is require. -292- This information sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City ~3f Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 4']2-0600. General Zoning Information Sheet R-1 Zoning District- Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS - Lot Area, Lot Width. and Setback Reo_uirements: Minimum Lot Area'(measured above the flood elevation) .................. ~... 10,O00 SCj.uare-fee~ Minimum Lot W~dth* .............. 'f .... J · ' ' · ..................................................................... /'. _. ~J Tee~ Front Yard Setback ...................................................................................... ~et Side Yard Setback ............................................................................................. 10 feet Rear Yard Setback ............................................................................................ 15 feet Minimum Lot Depth ........................................................................................... 80 feet Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback ......... ~ ................................................... 50 feet Minimum Floor Area Requirement: ......................................................... 840 square feet *Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 60 feet, except that lots frontir3g on a cul-de-sac shall be 60 feet at the front building setback line. Building Height: Maximum 21/2 stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height. Building Height is defined as "the vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof." LOTS OF RECORD, Special Provisions; Corner Lots: lot width minimum side yard setback 40 - 50 feet 10 feet 51 - 80 feet 20 feet 81 feet or more 30 feet Side Yard Requirements: The required side yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet. lot width minimum setback on 1 side yard 40 - 79 feet 6 feet 80- 100feet .. 8feet 101 feet or more 10 feet Front Yard: Except as regulated in Section 350:440, Subd. 6 of the City Code, the front yard ~etback shall be based on the lot depth as follows: lot depth minimum front yard setback 60 feet or less 20 feet 61 - 80 feet 24 feet 81 feet or more 30 feet Rev. 3/97 -293- R-1 Zoning Distr/ct Genera/~oning Inforrna t/on HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS: impervious surface coverage of Iotsshall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. On existing lets of' record*, impervious coverage may be .permitted by a maxin~um of 40 percent providing that techniques are utilized as identified in Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1. Impervious cover is any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water'or surface moisture, including all buildings, driveways and parking areas wJ~P~t~er paved or not, tennis cou~ts, sidewalks, patios anct swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum Ol~ming between boards shall not be counted in impervious cover calculations.. DETACHED ACCESSORy BUU~D'INGS (GARAGES/SHEDS) - Lot Coverage and..Setback,F:leouiremer~.~.: An accessory building shall be considered to be an integral part of the principal structure unless it is five (~) feet or more from the principal structure'~r use and providing that the structure exceeds 1'20 square feet. 1. Area and Size Re0uirements Ieee hardcover reouirements on oaoe 1): Accessory buildings shall not exceed a total gross floor'area of 3,000 square feet or 15 % of the total' lot area whichever is less. Each individual accessory building shall not exceed 1,200 square feet of gross floor area. The total number of accessory buildings for lots measuring 10;000 square' feet or less shall be two (2). On lots exceeding 10,000 square feet, accessory buildings Shall! I~e limited to a total of'three (3). Front Yard Setback, All accessory buildings shall meet the same front yard setback requirements as the principal building, except for lakes.bore and t. hrough lots; For detached garages-On a'lak.eshore or through Iots~ a minimum t.wenty.(20) foot front yard setback is requi:red if the'garage door(s)open to the street; an eight (8) foot front yard setback is required if the garage door(s)open tothe side lot line. Side Yard Setback. A detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of the side lot line in the rear yard with a minimum of a six (6) foot setback in side yard Iocation.~,: On thrOUgh and I~ikeShore Iots,.a del~ached acCessorY building ma'y be located with)h four (4) feet of. the side lot line in the front yard. Whenever a garage is designed with the doors facing a side lot line, the minimum distance between the doors and the side lot line shall be twenty (20) feet.. 4. Rear Setba(~k. A detached accessory building may be located Within fo~f [4)feet of the rear lot line. 5. Lakeshore Setback. Detached accessorY buildings must mainl;ain, a 50~ foot. s.e,t, ba~k from t,he ordinary ~ See separate deck' handout for more information. :. '; Front and Sides ..... ,'~,,¥...~ ........................................ Same as Accessory Building Setbacks Re'ar ......... . .....10 ~eet ,/~i'i,') .:.. - . .... '" OrC)lnary Ni~ii Water Flood Elevation' Lowest Floor Elevation LAKE MINNETONKA '~ 929.4 931 (CITY) 933 931 ,B (MCWD), DUTCH LAKE ........ 939.2 940 942 LAKE LANGDON 932,1 935 937 3/97 -294- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO.' Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 7, 2003 SUBJECT: Request for release of portion of Hennepin County tax-forfeited parcel (Lots 14-15) APPLICANT: Mike Kramer LOCATION: Adjacent to property located at 5500 Breezy Road PID: 13-117-24-23-0053 ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY Mike Kramer has submitted a request to the City of Mound to consider release of a Hennepin County tax-forfeit parcel (Lots 14-15) which is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road. It is City staff's understanding that he would like to purchase the two (2) lots as he currently has a private dock located on the property. REVIEW PROCEDURE There is no formal review process in the City Code that deals with tax-forfeit properties. However, a 1997 in-house policy created an informal procedure to respond to such requests which requires review by City staff and the Planning Commission and the Park Commission. Additionally, a 1984 resolution established a policy regarding payment of assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit properties prior to forfeiture. Copies of both documents have been included as attachments. With regards to this particular request, City officials and commission members are advised that it was also referred to the DCAC for review as it involves lakeshore property and is currently part of the City's dock program. STAFF REVIEW Please refer to the Staff'Report dated October 2, 2002 which has been included as an attachment which includes background information regarding the subject site. -295- POSAC REVIEW At its November 14, 2002 meeting, the POSAC reviewed the request and voted 4 to 2 to recommend denial of the request. DCAC REVIEW At its November 21, 2002 meeting, the DCAC reviewed the request and voted 5 to 1 to recommend approval of the request. PC REVIEW At its December 9, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and voted 4 to 2 to recommend approval of the request. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The applicant, Mike Kramer, has been invited to attend the January 14, 2003 City Council meeting to provide comment regarding the request. Members of the City Council are advised that it is anticipated that a formal process will be established in 2003 to deal with tax-forfeit properties. In the event the City Council opts to approve the request, it will be forwarded to Hennepin County to commence the "release process." If the Council recalls, a similar request on Wilshire Boulevard was reviewed by the City at the County's request in October 2002. -296- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 9, 2002 Release of Tax-Forfeit Parcel on Breezy Road At its October 21,2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request from Mike Kramer for release of a portion of a tax-forfeit parcel that is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road. Following discussion, the Commission voted to table the matter pending review of the request by the POSAC and DCAC. Additionally, the Planning Commission asked City staff to contact Hennepin County to inquiry about the process in the event the City wishes to acquire tax-forfeit parcel. The DCAC recommended the property be sold. The POSAC recommended the City retain the property. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Brown, to recommend the property be offered for sale to the adjoining property owner at a fair market value. Burma was concerned about the Dock program being whittled away by releasing properties such as this. MOTION carried. Glister and Burma against. Hasse, Brown, Michael and Mueller for. -297- 5341 Mayw°°d Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472.3190 From: Date: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director 12/3/2002 Kequest by Mike Kramer for release of portion of tax-forfeit property (Lots 14-15) located behind his property located at 5500 Breezy Koad BACKGROUND At its October 21, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request from Mike Kramer for release of a portion ora tax-forfeit parcel which is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road. Following discussion, the Commission voted to table the matter pending review of the request by the Parks and Open Space Commission (POSAC) antt the Docks and Commons Advisory Commission (DCAC.) Additionally, the Planning Commission aSked City staffto contact Hennepin.County to inquiry about the process in the event 'the City wishes to acquire a tax-forfeit parcel. POSAC REVIEW At its November 14, 2002 meeting, the POSAC reviewed the request and voted 4 to 2 to. deny the request. A copy of the meeting minutes from the 11/14 meeting have been included as an attachment. ' DCAC REVIEW At its November.gl, 2002 .meeting, the. DCAC reviewed the r~ue~t and voted 51t611 ~o: approve the' reque~ Ac0py of the meeting!~nutes from the 1 i/2'! meeting hav:e been 'inCluded as an attachment. · .: .~'~. , ~ ' H-ENNEPIN COUNTY INQUIRY City staff contaqt~d Hennepin. County'raxpa~er Services reg~ding the: process for Public acquisit~ib'h..· Thef~'~b m~th6~h::~ co~0nly ~tt'~i~i~ich'i~clud~P~bli~ ~ ~nveYahCe w~fi i~volvesthe tr~hr'~f~ ~%l't; ~l;c~ g%d~me~t~:~y:~h~ ~Ouay for public use (ie. p~k.) ~d public sale in which the County sells a pr°pe~'~t°~the ~ity abhor ~ folloMng ~ appr~sM. The method used is determ~ed by the imended use of the parcel ~ question. ,.~: -298- MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND AD~SORY P~A~ OPEN SPACE COMMISSION November 14, 2002 Chair John Beise, Commissioners Norman Domholdt, Derrick Hentz, Susan Taylor, Gene Hostetler, and City Council Representative David Osmek. Also Present: Parks Director Jim Fackler, Recording Secretary Denice Wi dmer Absent and Excused: Ron Motyka Citizens Present: Chris Shaw, Tom and Heather Porter, Tom and Amy Reese, Jim and Cathy Veit, and two others Who did not sign in. Chair Beise called the meeting to order at 7:32pm. APPROVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 12~ 2002 MEETING MINUTES e MOTION by Hentz seconded by Hostetler to approve the September 12, 2002 Park and Open Space Meeting Minutes. MOTION carried unanimously. AGENDA CHANGES e No agenda changes. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS ,p~SENT',ON ,AM ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA(LIMIT TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER) None DISCUSS: IMPROVEMENTS OF AVON, CA~SON AND LOST' LA~ PARKS WiTH PARK~DISTRiCT 1 CiTiZENSI~N ATTEND~CE. There were nine citizens present for this discussion. Beise gave them a rundown of what the Park and Open Space Advisory Commission hopes to accomplish in their parks. Beise stated the Commission will be meeting with all the districts -299- the next few months to discuss what improvements, maintenance and community involvement is needed for their particular parks. The resident at 5641 Bartlett, Tom Reese, asked the commission exactly where each of these parks are located. Beise presented an overhead display map for this purpose. Keese then raised the question of the Skate Park,:~ named "Zero Gravity". (This park should be included with the District 1 parks.) Hostetler stated that cOnstructiOn will be getting underway in the spring. He explained that the funds, donated by Tom Stokes of Brenshell Homes, were expected shortly. Reese stated that he is highly in favor of this park, as there is a real need in this community for recreational areas for teens. Domhok explained to the residents that parks money is one of the first items to be cut during the city's budget process. The commissioners realized they could no longer totally count on city money for park improvements and maintenance so they decided to turn to the residents for assistance. Domholt explained that the residents could facilitate improvements and assist in maintenance by volunteering to ,supply the paint~ lumber, etc. necessary. Domholt also stated that the jcommission is trying to create community involvement in every aspect of the parks so that area residents have ownership. He also asked the residents to bring their concerns and complaints to the commission so they can act on them. Chris Shaw, 4978 Bartlett, then raised the question as to how they can make the fishing better at Carlson Park? He stated that people are fishing off'the docks, which is a violation, and too many people are trying to cram into a small space. Beise stated that they had spoken to residents over the years to see if they wanted more. picnic tables, etc. At that time, they were opposed to making it more available to the public. Hostetler asked if signs, directing people to other fishing sites, might help. There are not many amenities at Carlson Park at the moment. Shaw stated that he appreciates the flowers the city plants, and he waters them daily, Fackler then mentioned the park vandalism problem. He asked the residents to call the police when they see violations happening. Fackler also stated that the citizens can. really help the commission by bringing concerns about their parks to the City Council. Shaw asked if snowmobiles do damage to the environment, .He said snowmobilers come offthe lake at Carlson Park. Fackler stated he hasn't noticed that they are a huge pmb!~m there. He stated aprob!em does.arise during the first snowfall when snowmobilers go out and dp~up the grass in the parks, etc. Reese then asked who maintains the cemetery, Fackler stated ,that it, is his department, but that he is very short-staffed. He stated they seed each new grave, but are not responsible for setting headstones and/or monuments. Those complaints should be directed to the contractor. Fackler also explained how -go'o- weather affects the headstone and graves. He also explained rules for flowers, etc around the graves. The park district 1 discussion was then ended. DISCUSS: REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF PORTION OF HENNEPIN COUNTY FORFEITED PARCEL (Lots 14-15) The applicant, Mike Kramer, was not present. Fackler stated that his recommendation was that the shoreline not be vacated. Beise then briefed the commissioners on the site. He stated that the site contains a hugs ravine, it is not a build able lot, there is no use for a future park at the site, and that it is basica}ly storm water storage for the county road~ The only benefit Beise Saw was the 80' of lineal footage for the dock program. He asked if there was any benefit to the city to have docks there. Fackler stated that this 80' did count towards the total lineal footage for the City. The docks program currently has 564 boats, and they are licensed for 590. He also Stated that they do have a lineal footage buffer, but that the buffer is dwindling. The lineal footage from this property could mean more docks at Carlson Park, for instance. Fackler was asked what kind of an impact this would have on the Docks Program. He stated that it wOuld eliminate 1.5 boats. Fackler stated he can see no benefit to either the parks or the docks programs in giving up this property. Fackler stated that he feels .quite strongly about not setting precedent or giving up something we can't get back. DiscuSsion then centered on what the monetary benefit would be to the city in releasing this property. Osmek stated that there would be a taX benefit to the city as the new owner would then have lakeshore. Osmek also stated there is no real access to't~his property as far as green spacel Taylor brought up the fact that Fackler is always commenting to the commission that he is short on both funds and manpower, so there would be a cost to the city if the property was designated as a park. Question was then raised as tO how many of the surrounding property owners have docks there, and whether or not the applicant has a dock therel Ther~ is city owned dock space on that property. Fackler stated that there are private docks, but FaCkler was Unsure whether or not the applicant had a dock there.'Fackler stated he Would CheCk with Docks PrOgram Administrator, Katie Hoff, in the mOrning on this. *(Hoff has since stated that the applicant is p~rt of the docks program and utilizes the city-owned dock space there.) Fackier was then asked if this property was dedicated as commons. He stated it was not, but that the land has been counted as lineal footage for docks for over 17 yearsl -301 - Beise then stated the commission needed to consider this property from a park and open space perspective, and let the docks commission make their own decision. MOTION by Beise to deny the release of this property. MOTION SECONDED by Domholt. There were four in favor of the motion and two opposed. 0 DISCUSS: SNOWMOBILE ISSUES Taylor stated that some residents in her area had asked what could be done to prevent a tragedy from occurring when snowmobilers come off the lake on Manchester at high speeds where are kids sliding and tubing on "Killer Hill". The neighbors have asked whether this area can be patrolled. It was pointed out that the snowmobilers are not in violation, and that the hill in question is not a city-owned, designated sliding area, but there is still the issue of safety. A suggestion was made to stretch an orange, plastic snow fence from the Snow fence to redirect the snowmobiles away from the hill, Fackler stated he would check with the insurance carrier .regarding this issue. DISCUSS: PARK NAMING Beise stated that he was very disappointed with the poor public response, Only three suggestions were received, and one ofthern, HaddoffField, was already out there. Beise made a recommendation to name the park at Langdon Bay after Rex Alwin, who was a true contribntor to the City of Mound. He stated that the Alwin family had owned the site since its inception and that Rex was instrumental on the Parks and Planning Commissions. Fackler stated 'that he wanted to invite the Rottlund Homes residents to attend a meeting in December or January to discuss their park Residents there have called to say they want to be involved. Funds are available. This park is not part of the homeowner's association. Fackler was also asked what the time frame was for park naming. He made the recommendation that they have the Parks named so signs could be made for park dedications in June, 2003 Osmek stated that he would like to suggest naming the Metro Plains Park after Frank Weiland. Frank has served the city for 32 Years. MOTION by Osmek to name MetrO Plains Park after Frank Weiland. Motion failed for lack of a second. Recommendation by Beise that each commissioner come up with two names for each park for the next meeting. -302- 8. REVIEW: CAPITAL OUTLAY EXPENDITURES FOR 2002 $50,534.99 spent to date. $55,500,00 budgeted. The question was raised as to whether or not the Highland Park play structure was still on the list for City Council consideration. Osmek stated it has not been discussed. Police cars need to be replaced. Domholt stated that the park dedication monies could not be used for that purpose. Osmek said the dedication money was not gOing to be use3 for any other purpose except parks, but that the money did impact the city's fund balance. Osmek stated the dedication money could be used for the play structure, and the city would repay it with general funds over a period oftime, which would not affect the fund balance. Gino is looking into this. OSmek's primary objective is getting the play structure done. 9. REVIEW: DECEMBER CALENDAR The budget will nOt be available in the packet, but may or may not be available for the meeting. Park naming and snowmobile issues will be added. Residents from Districts 2 & 3 will be invited to attend the December meeting, Districts 4 & 5 in January, and District 6 in February. REPORTS: OSmek reported that the council stays the same. The general levy had a 1.8% increase, Which is still below inflation. The Police Chief interviews will be done Friday, NOvember 15. He alSo reported that he and Bob BroWn have chosen a planter at the Depot as their yearly project. The downtown develoPer is working hard with Coleman and Olson to vacate the railway earlier in order to get the greenway project and the re-routing of Cty Rd 15 going sooner. The Planning Commission has a spot open and will be interviewing 5 candidates. When asked about the Minnehaha bOat, Osmek stated that it Was pretty much a dead issue since the boat didn't fit under the bridge. Fackler stated he has a budget meeting on Novembei 25! His department is currently Winterizing their equipmenL ~The ret~ning wai! project is unde~ay. He estimates that $200,000.00 will be spent now, and $300,000.00 ~ill be sPent in the spring. The demolition of the old post office will take place some time in December. The dredge will not happen this winter. The Greenway project will hopefully begin some time in the sp~ing; ltostetler reported that the donated money should be received soon, sO the project can begin in the spring. MOTION by Domholt to diSmiss the meeting. SECONDED by Beise. Meeting adjourned at 10:00pm. -303- MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION November 21, 2002 Present: Chair Jim Funk, Vice Chair Greg Eurich, Frank Ahrens, Gerald Jones, Mark Goldberg, City Council RePresentative Mark Hanus Also present: Parks Director Jim Fackler, Dock InSpector Katie Heft, Secretary Denice Widmer Citizens present: Steve (Unable to read written last name)', new owner of 5446 Bartlett Blvd property. Meeting Called to Order by Chair Jim Funk at 7:30pm 1. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 15, 2002 DCAC MI/gUTES MOTION by Funk to accept Minutes with the changes. SECONDED by Goldberg. Motion carried. AGENDA CHANGES There W&re no changes. 3. coMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON t ANY ITEM NOT ON ~ AGENDA. None present. DISCUSS: REQUEST FOR DOCK AT 5446 BARTLETT BLVD: Fack!er gave a brief background stating that when this issue has COme up in the' past, it''has been granted under the condition that staff has time to find a spot for the indlviduai being moved out oithat dock. Fackler also stated there may be the possibility ~f putting an additional dock in this area, but there would be limits as to the size of the boat, etc. Fackler stated that there are currently 8 dock sites in this area, and two of them are abutters. He also stated there may be a possibility of putting a multiple Slip dock in this area, but that he would'have t° dO more research on this. The issu~e of this property and the 929 4!ine is .currently being addressed. FaC~er stated he would measure the site, figur~ the COst of adding a mui~tiple dock'. ~a findl°ut what the Shoreline dep~ for th~'next~ meeting Ahrens made the recommendation that the 'commissioners view the sil~ before the next meeting. ~ MOTION BYAhrens to table this issue until the December me.~ting. SECONDED BY Funk. Motion carried. -304- .DISCUSS: RE,QUEST FOR RELEASE OF PORTION OF HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX FORFEITED PARCEI,~ (LOTS 14-15) Fackler gave a brief background on this issue, and displayed aerial photographs of' the property. He stated that the applicant actually has a dock at the locatior~, through the Docks Program. All the other docks in this area are privately o~vned. I-Ie also stated that this property is not considered accessible as a public right-of- way, and most 'likely would be deemed inaccessible. However, this area is counted in the LMCD. Hanus asked whether this water is navigable or not and whether or not there is validity to the DCAC even having a dock at the site. He was informed by Fackler and Eurich that this is indeed a navigable waterway. Goldberg then asked i£they ever want to let go ora dock for the lineal footage of the Docks Program. Hanus stated there is excess lineal footage as there is.: Goldberg then asked what the pros and cons of releasing this property were. Hanus stated that one negative was that if the City deems this a.useable dock site, then'the city is responsible for keeping it navigable. He also stated that the apPlicant could file a claim for the City to do this at a cost of $50,000.00 or more. Ahrens stated that the storm water issue was taken care of in 1995, but that it remains a storm water issue, not a dock issue. Hanus asked when the street was vacated as that may have an impact on this issue. No information was readily available. The property is land-locked. Ahrens stated that if you look at tkis issue from a dollar sense, releasing the property would create more revenue than the dock fee. MoTIoN By Goldberg to recommend to the councii that the DCAC: did hot have a problem with them voting either way on this iSSue. SECONDED BY Funk. In discussion, Ahrens disagreed with the motion, stating that the DCAC needed to make a deci sion one way or another Goldberg stated,he would withdraw hi s motion. Was told he did not need to withdraw it, just amend it. Goldberg then stated he would amend his motion to say they would release the property. Ahrens agreed. MOTION BY Ahrens to release the property. SECONDED BY Goldberg. In discussion, Funk asked why they should release the property Ahrens stated that the land Cannot be used by the public, so it's really ofily Useable by the appliCant. Ahrens also stated'that the City Would derive better use of the property by putting it back on the ta~ roles. He also stated that it's ~his opinion that any time you can put forfeited property back on the tax roles, the better. Motion passed With a vOte of 5 Yes and 1 no. -305- 6. DISCUSS: RIP RAP LOCATIONS: Fackler referred to his October 8, 2002 memo which stated that due to high water levels on Lake Minnetonka, staff is not recommending any specific sites for the 2003 tip-rapping. Fackler also stated that the 2002 rip-rapping projects which are completed as far as the $20,000..00 allotted would allow. $30,000,00 .has been set aside until the spring of 2003 when staff can evaluate what other tip-rapping needs to be done. MOTION BY Funk to table this issue and reassess it in the spring. SECONDED BY Goldberg. MOTION carried. DISCUSS: REQUEST TO PURCHASE PRINTER Fackler stated the GPS system that staff was intending to purchase was unsatisfactory, so there is still $400.00 remaining in the budget. Fackler requested that $250.00 be set aside to purchase a printer for Katie Hoff, Docks Inspector. Hanus stated Hoffwould be getting a pretty nice printer for that amount of money. Hoff stated she had not done any research on that as yet, but was very sure the final cost would be under $250.00. MOTION BY Jones to purchase a printer SECONDED BY Funk. Motion carried. DISCUSS: MULTIPLE DOCKS/SLIPS ISSUE~q Fackler gave a brief background on Centerview Beach and Beachside North as possible new multiple dock site locations. Parking remains a problem at Center~ie.w. Fackler had drawn up diagrams of th, current docks and future docks at Centerview. Commission decided to concentrate on Centerview Beach at this time. Fackler will work with the LMCD and come back to the Commission with further information at the December meeting, Beachside North will be discussed in the future. 2002 SEASON FINAL REPORT Goldberg stated that he really liked the summary. Katie brought up the issue of shares with no boats. MOTION by Funk to bring this issue back in December SECONDED 'by Eurich. ' ..... Motion Carried. -306- * RI~VI~W: ItUBGET RECOMMENBATION ['OR U§E OF BOCI~' 10. 11. 12. FUND Goldberg requested this item be introduced here, as he had to leave the meeting early. Commission agreed. Discussion followed on wording of Budget Recommendation written by Goldberg. Changes were noted. Final copy will. be typed up by Secretary and brought by Fackler to the City Council Budget meeting on Monday, November 25, 2002. MOTION by Goldberg to accept the final wording of the Budget Recommendation For Use of Dock Fund SECONDED by Ahrens. Motion carried. * Goldberg left the meeting at 9:34pm. Chair Funk noted that time was running out and there were still several items on the agenda to be discussed. MOTION by Funk to continue the meeting for another 30 minutes, until 10:30, SECONDED by Jones. Motion carried. DISCUSS: 2003 DOCK LOCATION MAP CHANGES Moved to December meeting. Discuss: 2003 FORMS Hoff recommended instead of stating "Owner (paying fee for renter)" that "paying fee for renter" be deleted and simply state "Owner". Owners of a rental property cannot apply for a dock for their renters. The renters have to apply. Hoff also stated she wants to change "Summer Resident" on both the application and Waiting List forms to help distinguish between snowbirds and others who claim to be summer residents. It was agreed to delete "Summer Resident." and add the words "Winter mailing address if different from above" on both forms. It was agreed that a clean-up of the program needs to take place by declaring that shares have to be permanent residents of the City of Mound. The ordinance may have to be changed to reflect this. Hoff also recommended that shares have a boat. Commission was in agreement on this issue also as you don't have to be in the Docks Program to go on a dock and fish. These two issues will be discussed at the December meeting. DISCUSS: 2003 DOCK/SLIP FEES Fackler stated staff is looking to approve a 15% Senior discount, increase the Share fee, raise the 21 day temporary boat docking fee to $40.00, and get that fee and the unregistered boat penalty fee of $25.00 more in sync. -307- DiScusSion: Agreement'thai'Senior discount would be 15%. Funk expressed concern that the Share fee not show a marked increase. Agreement made to raise the Share fee to $100.00. Agreement made to raise the docking fee to $40.00. During the discussion on the penalty fee, it was discovered that it is preserttly $25.00 a day, although it is not worded as such on the fee schedule: General consensus was to keep it at $25.00 a day, and word it as such on the fee schedule. MOTION by Jones for the Share holder fee to increase to $100.00 and the Other changes as proposed; Senior discount at 15%, 21 day temporary boat docking fee to increase to $40.00, and the unregistered boat penalty fee to stay at $25.00 a day for the year 2003. SECONDED by Funk. Motion carried. 13. DISCUSS: 2003 BUDGET SHEET/EXPENDITURES/INCOME HanuS stated he disputes the figure of $6,500.00 on pg. 67 under #307 Admin/Computer Charge and will be discussing this with Gino Businaro at the upcoming City Council budget meeting. Further discussion was tabled until the December meeting. MOTION by Funk to adjourn the meeting at 10:34 SECONDED by Eurich. Motion carried2 -308- 5541 Ma~vood Road Mound, ]V~ 55364 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Open Space Commission and Docks and Commons Advisory Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 2, 2002 SUBJECT: Request for release of portion of Hennepin County tax-forfeited parcel (Lots 14-15) APPLICANT: Mike Kramer LOCATION: Adjacent to property located at 5500 Breezy Road PID: 13-117-24-23-0053 ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential .COMPREItENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY Mike Kramer has submitted a request to the City of Mound to consider release of a Hennepin County tax-forfeit parcel (Lots 14-15) which is located behind his property at 5500 Bre~e:~y Road. It is City staff's understanding that he would like to purchase the two (2) lots as he currently has a private dock located on the property. REVLEW PROCEDURE There is no formal review process in the City Code that deals 'with tax-forfeit properties. However, a 1997 in-house policy created an informal procedure to respond to such requ'ests which requires review by City staff and the Planning Commission and the Park Commission. Additionally, a 1984 resolution established a policy regarding payment of assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit properties prior to forfeiture. Copies of both documents have been included as attachments. With regards to this particular request, City officials and commission members are advised that k is also being forwarded to the DCAC as it involves lakeshore property and is currently part of the City's dock program. -309- BACKGROUND INFORMATION Parcel Information. Size: 64,620 SF (1.48 acres) Legal Description: Lots 14-22, Block 1 and Lots 1-3, Block 4 including adjacent vacated streets Address: Unassigned Ownership: Hennepin Coumy and held in trust by the City of Mound Property Tax Status: According to Hennepin County, the subject property is vacant and is tax exempt CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire ChiefPederson No comment. Acting Police Chief McKinley No concerns from Police Department. City Manager Hanson The City Manager supports properties not on the tax rolls being combined with adjacent properties except for fire lanes. Public Works Director Skinner City has storm sewer from CSAH 110 and Peabody to Harrison's Bay. Refer to comments from City Engineer John Cameron. Building Official Simoneau No comments. City Engineer Cameron The City has a stormwater pond located on this parcel with an outlet to the channel located in the vacated fight-of-way of Peabody Road. However, this outlet is located on Lot 17 which is west of the two lots in question. From an engineering perspective, these lots are not required in order to maintain the existing municipal storm system. 2 -2,1'0- Parks Director Fackler Comm. Dev. Director Smith This tax parcel is shoreline property and is counted in the City's Dock Location Map. · In the event the parcel is released and sold by Hennepin County it is possible a "waiver of platting" or minor subdivision will be required. The subject property is deemed to be "non- buildable." In the event it is released, it should be only be sold .to the adjacent property owner(s), It is City staff's understanding that the DNR will be contacted by Hennepin County for formal comment prior to release of any property fronting public waterbodies. 3 -311 - -312- Hennepin County Map.Server 'Hennel in Count /, Scroll down to see property address, value~: Page 1 of 1 13-117-24-23-0053 Proper t~_ Address ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MOUND, MN 0 Lastupdate:08~712~2ml:00:~PM Approximate' Property Perimeter 1,264 ~.' Market Value $ Approximate $ .00 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin CoUnty does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives, If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2018 or email him directly at _BPJ~...M_oul___d_~.L@C_O.,_h~.q.rLe. p_n.mn The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application, requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin Count. y http://WWWl 9'c°'hemnepin'mn.us/sc,ripts/esrimal:_§~3-me=Hennepinacmd=Identi£y&Left.. 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: Prope~ ID: Hennepin County, Property Information Search Res~ult The Hennepin County -P~oper~. Tax web database is updated daily (Monday ~ Friday) at 'approximately 9:15 p. ~. (CST) ........... E. ar ceLD_ata_forJms ~.ie 20~,2 Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: 13-! 17-24-23-0053 85 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MOUND 277 3 Construction year: Parcel Size: IRREG[ HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent armsqength transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes &Bounds: Tax Parcel Description LAKE SIDE PARK A L CROCKERS 1ST DIV LOTS 14 THRU 22 BLK 1 AND LOTS 1 THRU 3 BLK 4 INOL ADJ VAC STREETS Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 · Values Established by. Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total-Tax: Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 http://www2.co.hennepin.mn, us/pins/pidresult.j s"_~'~-~%l 311724230053 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Values: Land Market Building Market IVlachinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited:- Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status VACANT LAND RESIDENTIAL NON- HOMESTEAD EXEMPT 8'13 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co, hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cor Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati¢ Send e,mait to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http ://www2. co.hennepin.rnn.us/pins/pidresult.j st £3 :l ~ -' 311724230053 8/9/2002 Hermepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, Click on map to view information on adjoining .properties Scroll down to see Property. addr..e..s..s~.y,a_lu__e....&.._tg_x..iAfg. ~in County Survey~ Maps Property ID 13-117-24-23-0021 Proporty Address 5500 BREEZY RD MOUND, MN 55364 Lastupda~:0~7~0~l:00:00PM Approximate Property Perimeter 356 ff. Market Value Approximate Property Area 7,781' Sq.ft. = 0.179 acres To~a[ Tax (2002) $ 140,000 $ 1,500.94 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page fbr the property you. have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of thls information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies ere found, Please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennep.in County Surveyors Office:at (612) 348-2618 Or email him directly at .B_~_.~Lk;[e_r.~.~0~.h~/.n_n..e_pj~l~.n..~.. The,~ua'iity 0Hhe dispiay may be influenced by your screen' size and resolution setting, and is best viewed. at 800x600 screen resolution, This application requires Internet Explorer 3,02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation CopyrigHt © 2000 Hennepin CoUnty httP ://www 19. co. hennepim~rm~, us/scripts/esrimaF_~ h-~ :me=Hermepin& Cmd=htentify &Le~... 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page '~ page 1 of 2 Search By: Property ID: ............ Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name &Address: Hennepin COunty, Property Information Search Res~alt The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Par,el Data for Taxos Payable 20~32 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax ~tatement 13-117-24-23-0021 5500 BREEZY RD MOUND 277 Construction year: 1966 3 Parcel Size: 80 X 10C M & J KRAEMER MICHAEL R & JAN M KRAEMER 5500 BREEZY DR MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. Sale Date: March, 1987 Sale Price: $86,200 Transaction Type: Warranty Deed Addition Name: Lot: Block: 001 Metes & BoUnds: LOTS 32 AND 33 Tax ParCel Description .' LAKE sIDE PARKA L CROCKERS 1ST DIV Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: $.140,000 Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax:~ · Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: $130,600 $130,600 $1,476.05 $24.89 http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pJdresult.js!_~3 i ~ -'- 311724230021 ' 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Total Tax: $1,500.94 Property InfOrmation Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of Jan~Jary 2, 2001 Val. Ues: Land Market $40,000 Building Market $100,000 Machinery Market' Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $140,000 $37,300 $93,3OO $130,600 RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD 824 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@¢o, hennepin, mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cor Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn:us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicatic Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult.j (~-~,~f: 1311724230021 8/9/2002 TAX FORFEIT PROPER~ -In-l-g92~ea!.t-w~-~~~cel~Mand, W~en w ~e_fl0_~. v_~_parce!s the, '~~ure we u~. Hennepin County notifies us of property within the City that has gone tax forfeit because of nonpayment of real estate taxes. They also periodically ask about property we have taken for a public purpose to insure that we are using it for that public purpose. The County asks that we inform them of what we would like done with the property i.e., allow the parcels to the sold at public auction; require that'they be sold only to adjoining property owners if they are Undersized or do not meet the zoning and building codes; or retain them for some public purpose. There is a considerable amount of research that must be done to determine what should be done with the property. The first step is to go to the tax books and get a property description. Then the property jacket is pulled and its contents examined to see if the property was taken for a public purpose or is a new tax forfeit parcel. The next step is to figure the square footage of the property and look at the current zoning district to determine if it is a buildable lot or not. After all this information is determined, it is all put on a sheet, a plat map showing the property is made and sent to the Cit~y Engineer, Park Director, Public Works Superintendent, Building Inspection and Finance Director for their comments and recommendations. Occasionally, an easement is needed for utility purposes; a survey may be needed to determine if part of the property is in the wetlands; or there may be reasons for the City to retain the property. The Special Assessment Clerk in the Finance Dept. determines if there are any assessments from before forfeiture or since forfeiture that need to be put back on the property. The reason we need to know assessments before and since forfeiture is that the City gets 90 % of the purchase price to apply to assessments frOm before forfeiture. The assessments since forfeiture are added in their entirety to the appraised value (determined by the Hennepin County Assessor) of the property. The Park Comrnissission and Planning Commission are then sent the information on the forfeited land for their recommendation. In 1984, the City Council adopted a 'resolution (//84-94, copy attached) setting a policy on assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit property before forfeiture. This has helped to encourage adjoining property owners to purchase undersized parcels and combine them with their property. In 1987 I completed a card index by Property Identification Number for the following: City oWned property; Tax forfeit property that has been retained by the City for a public purpose; Tax forfeit property that fails into the following categories: -319- Property released for public sale; Property for sale only to and combined w}th adjoining property. (what it is, park, wetlands,, tax forfeit, etc.), whose name it iS'in (State Land Dept. or City of Mound or both), any resolutions dealing with the parcel (resolution number and. disposition). I have now completed coordinating the Certificates of Titles, State Deeds, easements, etc. and recorded that type of information on each card also. This card file, is now complete and is being kept up-to-date. It has already proved to be a very valuable tool when some, one calls in to check on a parcel of land. Since we started dealing with tax forfeit property in 1982: 39 parceis have been put up to public auction; 37 parcels were retained for a public purpose; and 83 parcels have beenl authorized to be sold to and combined with adjoining properties; 5 temporary construction easements were reconveyed. Of the above, 34 parcels of the 39 have been sold at public auction and 48 of the 79 parcels have been sold to adjoining property owners to be combine with their property. I think this shows how this process is working to the city's advantage to get parcels back on the tax rolls and increase conformance to the zoning ordinance. We now have a computer program called Rapid File and all the information on the cards, has been inputted into the computer. -320- 132 June 12, 1984 RESOLUTION NO. 8~-9~ PLACED ON TAX ' RF · PR~ E: -: .'_--~---~ . - WHEREAS, Hennepin County has begun to notify adjacent property owners that they will be conducting "private sales" on undersized or unbuildable lots; and WHEREAS, some of these properties had assessments against them before forfeiture which were cancelled at the time of forefeiture; and WHEREAS, when the City releases these parcels for private sale, it certifies these assessments from before forfeiture to Hennepin County because the City receives 80% of the value of the property (selling price) to apply to the old assessments; and WHEREAS, the assessments since forfeiture are added to the appraised value so the City receives all the funds for'those assessments; and WHEREAS, some of the assessments from before forfeiture are higher than the property is valued at and thus does not make the property very attractive to adjoining property owners unless we make a committment to them that we will not reassess the remaining balance of the assessments after they purchase the property; and. WHEREAS, the goal is to get the property back on the tax role and help a number of people make their property conforming. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 'IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following policy which will apply only to undersized tax forfeit lots which are sold thru Hennepin County and combined with adjoining property: On undersized tax forfeit lots which had assessments before forfeiture, the City will certify these assessments to Hennepin County when the lots are released for private sale to adjoining property owners. This will be done only so that the'City will receive 80% of the value of the lot to be applied against these before forfeiture assessments. After certain undersized tax forfeit lots are sold and combined with adjoining property, the owner may petition the City Council to pass a resolution stating that the balance of the assessments from 'before forfeiture will not be recertified to -321 - 133 June 12, 1984 Hennepin County for collection. ~haron ~nd ~ecund~d by Counuilmember Pau'l~er~. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Charon, Jessen, Paulsen and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Councilmember Peterson was absent and excused. Mayor Attest: City Clerk -322- Jan-08-03 0g:54am From-Kennedy & Graven +61233?93]0 T-465 P.002/007 F-018 WALDRON LAW OFFICES, LTD, Ti~.LI;l'l IUNI; I9~2) 471-0940 DATE: PLEASE DEI.IVER TO: JOHN B, ATTORNEY AT LAW ~P$1 CONCO~A W6YZAT~, MI~SOTA 53391-932fi January 7, 2003 John B. Dean, Esq. email jbw~waldm~iaw.ctim wcbsflG www,waldmntnw,com FIRM/COMPANY: FAX NI. JMBBR: Kennedy & Graven, Chart;red 61:2 - 337 - 9310 FROM: John B, Waldron, Eaq, [:AX NUMBER; (952) 471 - 8559 , TOTAL PAGES SENT (including this page): _. ~ NO'FEE: _~ohn - as we discussed, I am attaching a copy of thc Report of Examinor relative to the land registration proceeding thc City of Mound was recently joined to. Also attached is a proposed Assent to Registration for your r~view and approval. If you do not roceive all pagos ~'ansmitted, please contact John Waldron at (952) 471-0940. ORIGINALS: X [] NOT MAILED MAILED SENT OVERNIGHT COUR~ER TI'IF. INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE IS ATTORNF, Y PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INI~ORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR 'l'Hli U SI'.' OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF 'lYtB READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPII~.NT, OR TFiE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RES?,.O..~IBI.,E TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU AR.B HEREIBY NO'i IFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN EKKOP~ PLEASE IMMEDIATBI, Y NOTIFY US BY TELEPIIONE, AND R.12'I'URN TtlE OP. ItDINAL MESBAOE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESfl VIA TI. lB U,S, POSTAL SERVICE, THANK YOU. -323- Jan-08-03 09:§4am Fr0m-Kenned¥ & Graven +61Z33?g310 T-465 P.003/007 F-018 t-;~? ~ ~/:~ :"1; STATE OF MINNESOTA No. 206S6 DISTRICT COURT COUNTY O!: HENNEPlN FOURTH JUDICI,~. DISTRICT App. & Last. Doc. No. 7147668 In the Matter ul' the Application ROHUI.~H M. VEDA~HA(31'I] and KRI~I J, V~'UADHAC3N~, huebartd 8nd wife as J~inf. tenants, To Register the Title m Certain Land. REPORT OF ~INER TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE~ OF THE DISTEIG"I' COURT OF HENNEPIN COUNTY' Pureuant to Minn, St~t. §~iD6.13, the undemlgned Examiner of Titles has examined ~l~a tills ef ~h, Appll~s to t~a land des~b~ in the ~pll~flon, In~sflgat~d the troth all mattam set fa~h ~emln, datelined w~etheF ~ not the land Is occwpled, ~d, if o~¢uple~, the nature themo~ an~ by what dgM the o~upatlon is held. and also Whe~er ~r not any judgments against ~pll~n~ or those through ~om Ap~Ii~ olaim ~tle ~y be a lien upun the land described In the ~plt~on. I have saa~ all publl~ m~rds, and tully invast~a~d ail facts brought te my ~ ~e~inlng to the t~le, In,Iud[nB an inspection mpo~ by th~ Co~n~ Su~ey0~. Th~s re,gal to ~he Oeu~ ¢an~alns the of ~a proof and a Ca[fifi~ =f Opinion u~on the 1, At the tlm~ of the filing e~ ~a Ai3i31icatign hare]n, the Applicants were nut the oWnerS in fee simple of the lane in ~a County or Hennepln and State ~ Minnesota desC~Ded in th~ At~plicatiun en~3 as Lut 82, 'Phelps' lelnnd Park, First Division" aha that I~aE of a strip ef I~nd designated a~ "prate at,serf In "Phelps' island ~rk. First Division", lyi~ be~een ~e no,hotly ~en~i~ of ~e Ese[ a~d West lin~ af ~t 8Z, ~ld ~1~, ~ the share of B]agk gage. 2, AGoor~ing ~ the ^l;pll0a~lon and ttie Hannepln County eurve¥=,'. Inspe~tinn Reporton file h~mln the property i~ e~cupled by the applicanl.~. 3. According to the Application, 1he 13mperty i~, aabJ~ct '~ [] ~ag~, not yet m~rd.d, Jn raver of Wa~r ~trea~ Me.gage Com. T~ m~gage s~oula b~ re~ed, with evld~nc~ t~emof offered at ~e ~a~ng so ~at an nppmpflate ~nduding s~temen~ ~n be ~ntalne~ in the 'subject o[ausa" of Ihs Decree of -324- Jan-08-03 05:55am From-Kennedy & Graven +6123319310 T-4B$ P.O04/OO? F-O1B I mcommm, d as a defendanI Water 8treat Murt_q~qe 4. I notetbe_~llowlna encumbranaas, d. ef~s [a) The dee~l in favor of the applicants has not yet been reoordad an~l I haven't been given a ~opy. There sh~ulfl be e~den~ et ~e hearing s~ielent to austain a Rnding of ~m In ~e Oe~me of Regl~t~tlgn that ~he epplioants ara ~e ~o~ owners. The appZi~nts should also ~in f?~m a I]oe~eed abstm~or a~a file heroin a 5a~:l~ ~lficat~ against ~e appll~nts that compl[~ Wi~ Mlnneso~ TtOe S~nda~ No. 82. If there ar~ a~y additional de~n~anm to be name~ I will Issue a ~palementml ~maod. (b) Par~ of the land lrloluctad in ~hia registration was pleiad as a private street In the above plat. The de~l~tion ~]ause s~tes that the s~ets "are not In~nds~ for p~llc use or ~e~icated for public purposes or to b~ ~bje~ ~ publio or m~10ip$1 eon~l but ara intended for private uae and enjoyments, and are and shall remain tho ~ole and exdus~v~ p~upa~ of sai~ pmprietom, ~olr ~e~m and ~signs and ~e consroll~, improved, graded end maintained end regulated by the~ for their ~n bene~t and ~he ~mmon use and enjoyment of the owners af said ~, their helm an~ assigns f~eve?." (Tho pla~rs/propfletors later ~n~yed their interest in the prlv~ Otreet Into tho chain of [iris.} ~e?e is ne indi~n ~et ~e land J~ ~elng used oae e~eet on $~e? the In.pelion R.poA or the aerial half-eaton map mamntal~d by the Goun~ ~uweyor. Thai ~rrently ~wn~d b~ the ap~ll~n~, ~e~lfl~e of T~e No, There ~uld ~e ev~den~ at ~e headng sufficient ~ ~u~taln a finding of ~ in the mcgrds or [h~ Coun~ Re.er show thoam ~mons to be; Flea,rick P. CJ. ark a~d ~, husband and wife as joi~t ~ant~, Ba~ a~ ~mad~R, F_~ral Robe~.S, Mlfchall and ~n~ D~ MIt. hall, husband ~d wife as J~lnt tenant, ~~ne~. NA. I also ~:~mmend as d~tendan~ ~ ~ of Lo~ 80 and 81. the names whom ~hould be d~te~inad by the appJi~n~. 2. -325- Jan-08-O3 09:55am From-Kennedy & Graven +612337g310 T-465 P.OOB/OO? F-O1B Pursuant to the utility easement granted at ab,trod entry no, 73, the following ~3nc{uding statement ahotflc113e ~ontalnecl In the ~ubj~ct clause" of the Subject to a 15 r~ utility aasan~ent in favor ef tho CI~v of Mound c:~3ntnlned in County Recorder Oeaarnent Ne. 358232?, I rec, ommond the or.~iJaL.q~ as a deranoant. (~1) The City ~3f Mound granted a setback variance to atlaw for a non.riffling ~e~ ~y Cl~ Council Res~uti~n No, ~80 at abstract cnw no. T~. ?~e foll~lr]g To Res~lull~ County Rear, er I again remmmend the .,~ as a ~lefend~nl, {~. __'~lia! the ~arMaa defendant In sal_d- g~L/~le should be: ~ Water ~treet Me.age Ce~on (See Pa~, 4(a) as te 8u~plemen~ Repo~) - Fmderi~ P. Clark ~Anne M, C~ark Bank ~Ame~l~, Fademt ~vlngs Bank ' R~be~ S. Mitchell '- Wails Farg~ Bank Minn~ao~ ~ (See Par. 4(b) as 10 occupants) / Ci~ of Mgand *alsc~ ell heirs anti devisees of any of the above*named per~ens who am deceased; ancl all other parson~ or partJas unKnov/n claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest In the real estate described in the Application or amendment~ herein." -326- J~n-08-03 Og:$Sam From-Kennedy & Graven Aul'~'~2 (?~i~ ~om-HE~N fro ~ ~ TITLES +812~379310 T-485 P. O06/O07 F-015 That the market va[ua of the lar~d exclusive of Improvements is ?. 'l'hat all the mata~iat allegations conlained in the said Al~l~li~%n are sut~stantlalty true, aa herren statecl, exoept as hereinabm,~ foun~ end that al~plleant, is el~tltled te tbs relief 13rayed for upon correcting the IrregularitieB anti defect~ above named. ReEpectful¥ mubmffLed August ~1, 2002, Edward A. Bock, Jl% Examiner of .. By ...... ~. ~mball Foster Deput~/F_~a'l~[ner ~3f Titles -327- Jan-08-03 09:~$am From-Kennedy & Graven +$123379310 T-465 P.00?/00? F-018 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT I~OURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In the matter of the Application of:, Rohullah M. Vedadhaghi and Kri~ti J, Vedadl~aghi~ husband and wife, as Joint tcnants, To Rcg&.~t=r the Tttio to Cortaid Land Court File No, 20656 ASSENT TO REGISTRATION The Cily of Mound, a body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereby assents to thc Application :o register tiflc to the subject property herein, providud, however, mat th= Order and Decree of Rcgist. ration contain th~ following recitals in the "subjeot clause": Subj¢c~ to a 15 foot utility easement in favor of the City of Mound as contained in County R,zcordcr Document No. 3562327, To R=solution No. 98-60 of the City Counoil ef~he City of'Mound approving a lakeside setback variance, rooordod Jun~ 8, 1998, az Count,. Reoorder Document No. 69099~, CITY OF MOUND lely:. Its: STATE Die' MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HP, NNEPIN ) 'l'h~ foregoing inmrument was acknowledged before me thie day of January, 2003, by ....... , tho of the City of Mound, a body corporate and politic under thc laws of thc State of Minnesota, on bel~alfofsaid City. Notary Public -328- l-lC 400.3 (";-83) i.: "~ STATE OF ~4INNESOTA No.20656 .~,.,:i-/. ' ~ ., i.~' F'D, ISTRICT COU~T COUNTY 0F HENNEPIN ':.', ,', FOURTR .'~/~ICIAL DISTRICT BY- AMENDED LAND TITLE SUZ~MON$ IN APPLICATION FOR the Matter of the Application of Rohullah M. Vedadhaghi and Kr[sti 3. Ved~dhagh[, husband and wife, as joint tenants co r~.~pistor the title to the following described real estate sLtuated itl Henna, pin County, Minnesota, namely: i,OC 82, "Phelps' Island Park, First Division" and that part of a strip of land designated as "private street" in "PheLps' Island Park, First Division", lying between the nor%belly extensions of th East and west lines of Lot 82, said plat, to the shore of Black Lake. Applicant (s) vs. Washington Mutual Bank, FA, Federal Savin~8 Bank; Bank of America, Federal Savings Bank; Wu~ls Fargo Bank Minnesota NA; C~y Of Mound; Frederick ?. Clark; Anne M. Clark; and Robert S. Mitchell; also all heirs and devises of any of the above named persons whom are dece~n~(;d; and all other persons or par~ies unknown, claiming any right, e~Lat:e, ~len or ln~erest in ~he real estate described in the Applic,~tioa amendmen cs herein, Defendants. STATE OF MINNESOTAT0 THE ABOVE-NA~D DEFENDANTS: You are hereby summoned and required to answer 'the Application of the Applic:mt(s) in the above-entitled proceeding and to file your answer to the said Application in the office of the C~erk of said Court, J.n sai~ with~.n 20 days after service of this Summon~ upon you exclusive of the d~y of such service, and if yOU fall to answer the Application within th~. ti. me afor~sa~.d, the App].icant(s) in this proceeding will apply to the Court relief demanded therein. John Attorney for Applicants L951 Com;o.rdL-~ SLr,,~e~_ ,Wayzata, MN 55391 PhoP, e WITNESS, District Court Administr.:~tor/,';~prk of said Court, and the seal thor(;of, a~ Minneapolis in said County this.~{'~_ a.v of November,. 2002 - -329- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPI~ 7747666 HC 4018[7/96} Joint Tenants DISTRICT COURT · :,, ! FOURTH JUDICIAL 'DISTRICT In the Matter of the Application of ) ) Rohullah M. Vedadhaghi and Kr i s l: i J. Vedadhagh i ) as Joint Tenants ) To Register the Title to Certain Land) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) jUN I3 2002 Application To the Judges of the above named Court: We hereby apply to register the title to the land described below and do solemnly swear that we know the contents of this application are true of our own knowledge, except as to those matters stated on information and belief, and that as to those matters we believe them to be true. [cross out all paragraphs or words not applicable] A. Names: Ro.b.v,l..l.O.b../i......V.e..d..a..d.h..a.!l.h.] ............ andKrlstl J. Vedadhaghi ^ddress: 4 ~..6.6...X!,!.s,h!.r.e...R?..u.!?,.v.?.r,d,,:..,~.?.¥~.d.:...~.,N' .... .~,S..3.~.~. ................................. We are [a~e-not] 18 years of age or older. Applicants are married to ..e.!.c..h...o..t..h.e..r. ................................ who reside at . .4 3 ~.~...~/.i.J.s.b.t r. c...I} ~ p. ] .~.~.a.r..d.,.. ~ 9..u.n..d.,., .~.N., 55364 We have not been divorced. Jif you have been divorced, set out the date of the Decree, the £ourt File No., and the County and State in which It was obtained] C We arc not under any legal Incapacity except for: .~.o..n.e. .................................. Ill none state "none'] Description of land: [for the registration of easements over. unregistered land. the fee simple estate to which thc easements are appurtenant must also be described] Lot 87., Phclp,5' I~land Park, First'Division That. part of a strip of land deslgna~:ed as "private streeL" in Ph(:lps' Island Pork, First Division, lying between the northerly extonsions of the east and west lines of Lot 82, said plat, to the shore of Black Lake. -330- The estimated market value of the land to be r, eglstcred, exclusive of Improve- merits acco[ding to the last official assessment ~s ~ ~ I ~ 5,000.00 [fO bc ascertained from the County Finance Department- Pr6Perty ID .e'~ilgi 'gg~'~i;dl' '.;i]', .... D. Estate or interest claimed in the dominant estate is in fee simple and is {'ts-rtoiJ subject to homestead. E. '~-',~ ~""~,'-,," ,~ .......... -,,,,-~-,v-,-,-.~ ,~,~, The land is occupied by the following parties: Name Address Estate or Interest Rohullah M. Vedadhaghi ~66 Wllshlre Blvd. Fee Simple Mound, MN 55364 (joint t~nant) Krlsti J. Vedadhaghi 4366 Wilshlre Blvd. Fee Simple Mound, MN 5536~ (joint tenant) F. The follondng liens anO interests encumber the la~zd: Name of Claimant Lien or Interest Water Street Mortgage lst Mortgage Corp, Recording Data Not ~,et: available 300, 0¢0, o O We wish to terminate or modify the following liens or interests: [rot each lien or interest: list ~e names of the Interested parties, t.he relief sought and thc reason for rcquesung relief and the recording data tf any] Name of Claimant Lien or Interest Recording Data None Ho The title to the land contains the following other defects which should be cured: Ambiguous legal description in chain of title between Lot 8Z and Black Lake. -331 - We d~ ldo not] urlsh to register the ' ........................ boundary lines of the land. Inames and addresses of owners of lands affected by the determination of botmdaries must be listed below] We therefore request the Court to adjudicate that we are vested with title to the estate or estates In the lands as described above, and that the Court direct 'the Registrar of Titles to register the same Ln our names as jOint tenants and for such other relief as the Court finds appropriate. ...... Applt96nt ~ o~lyu4~l a h a. ............. g...-~ ~.~ ~.f. : Applicant I<r.~sti 0. v Subscribed and swam to before me on June 02 by Rohullah M. Ved~hag~.~d ~;.r..l.$.~.~..j .... ,~.e.d.e.dh~.g.b.i. .... , the applicants, notary public] DA~ CRONN tiOT~tY I~JSLICq~II~IESOTA I~ ~ b~a J~ 31. ZOO5 [Notary seal] Attorney for applicant: John g. Waldron Address: 195~ ¢oncordia Street Wayzata, MN ~5391 Telephone: 9 52-47 ~ - 0940 F~ 952-471-8859 -332- Approved for filing: ...... Dcput~ Exam inez(,,o.f~ TI'~;; CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, January 8, 2003 Tonka Bay City Hall CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · 36th Annual "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner, 2/13/03 at Lord FletcheCs Old Lake Lodge READING OF MINUTES- 12/18/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (.) will be approved in one motion unless a Board'member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. SAVE THE LAKE A) Michael Deering, discussion of 2003 Crystal-Pierz Marine Lake Minnetonka Cleanup Event; B) Additional Business; WATER STRUCTURES A) Terry Nagel, variance application from LMCD Code for side setback requirements plus an adjusted dock use area (Public hearing conducted at 7/24/02 Regular Board Meeting); B) City of Excelsior, new multiple dock license and special density license applications for 116 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 3,i20' of shoreline; · Discussion of density on Excelsior Bay utilizing 1973 Boat Density Policy Statement · Consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the new multiple dock and special density license applications. c) (*) 2003 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2003 renewal without change applications as outlined in 1/2/03 staff memo; D) Additional Business; FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (12/16/02 - 12/31/02) & (1/1/03 - 1/15/03); -333- 7.~ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT B) (*) November financial summary & balance sheet; C) Additional Business; LAKE USE & RECREATION A) (*) Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Significant Activity Report; B) Additional Business; EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A) (*) Minutes from the 12/13/02 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting (handout); B) 12/13/02 EWM/Exotics TaSk Force Meeting Report; C) Additional Business; ADMINISTRATION -334- D AFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, December 18, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMillan, OrOno; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Crv Burma, Mound; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Aisc present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Sheldon Wert, GreenwoOd; Victoria has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster Foster announced that the 36th Annual "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner was scheduled for Thursday, 2/13/02, at Lord Fletchers Old Lake Lodge. READING OF MINUTES. 11/13/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Suerth seconded to approve the minutes from the 11/13/02 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (8), Abstained (2; Burma and Skramstad); motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda. There were no comments from .persons in attendance on subjects not on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS · Forest Arms Homeowners Association, new multiple dock license application to reconfigure 14 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) at the non-conforming facility. Foster opened the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. and asked for background from staff. Nybeck made the following comments: · A new multiple dock license application has been submitted to re-configure the legal, non-conforming facility in the City of Orono on Forest Lake. The facility is currently approved for 14 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 220' of continuous shoreline~ with a BSU density of 1:16'. -335- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 2 The applicant is considered a legal, non-conforming facility because it has a BSU density that exceeds the 1:50' General Rule and because BSU's 13 and 14 do not comply with minimum side setback requirements established by Code. Code Section 2.015 allows legal, non-conforming facilities to reconfigure provided five requirements are met. These requirements are: 1) the application may not result in an increase in BSU's, 2) the application may not result in an increase in the total square footage of BSU's as determined in accordance with subd. 4 of this Section, 3) the application may not result in a lakeward extension any further beyond 100' from the 929.4 shoreline than the existing dock, 4) the application may not result in any further extension into non-conforming side setback areas than the existing dock, and 5) in the case of docks not in conformance with Section 2.01, subd. 2b)2) applicable to new facilities: i) no new BSU's shall be located in the setback area without first secudng a variance pursuant to Section 1.07, and ii) the application may not result inan increase in slip length opening toward non-conforming side setback areas. He analyzed the proposed new multiple dock license to verify that it complies with the five requirements outlined above. First, the applicant has proposed to maintain BSU's at 14, Second, the applicant has proposed to decrease the square footage associated with these 14 BSU's from 4,564 to 4,543. Third, the applicant has proposed the dock to be fully contained within 100' from the 929.4' shoreline, with the possible exception of BSU 1. There might be a need to place a boat overhang restriction on BSU 1 to ensure that the watercraft stored in it is also within 100' from the 929.4 shoreline. Fourth, neither the approved or proposed site plans comply with Code that requires the doubling of side setback requirements when a multiple dock facility abuts non-multiple dock facilities. This was grandfathered because the facility was originally licensed in 1977 and the doubling of side setback requirements was adopted in 1978. The facility is considered a legal, non-conforming facility as long as such structures are not expanded. Fifth, the applicant has proposed to increase in the length of BSU's 13 and 14, whiCh open towards the extended side site line, from 21.5' to 29'. To address this, the applicant has two alternatives. They could either: 1) adjust the location of BSU's 13 and 14 so that they would meet the 59' minimum side setback from the extended side site lines as required by Code, or 2) adjust the openings of these two BSU's so that they open towards the walkway. The applicant has agreed to adjust the location of BSU's 13 and 14 so that they maintain the 59' minimum side setback requirement, they have submitted an updated survey that documents this. The MN DNR and the City of Orono were provided a copy of the new multiple doCk liCense application in compliance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, and no feedback had been received. He recommended approval of the new multiple dock' license apPliCation for the 2003 seasonl subject to: 1) all 14 BSU's must be contained within the legal, conforming authorized dock use area, and 2) all 14 BSU's have a 4' overhang restriction for watercraft'stored within them as long as it is Contained within the conforming authorized dock use area. He entedained questions or comments from the Board. There being no further comments, Foster closed the public heating at 7:13 p.m. MOTION: McMillan moved, Seuntjens seconded to approve the Forest Arm's HomeoWners Association new multiple dock license application for the 2003 season, subject to complying with the recommendations outlined in the 12/11/02 staff memo. · The Board discussed the motion and Code pertaining to Code Section 2,015, the "envelope concept" ordinance, and how an authorized dock use area is defined. It was noted that both structure and storage of watercraft needed to be contained within the authorized dock use area, and that some Board members had concerns that -336- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 3 the storage of watercraft at BSU's 1, 13, and 14 needed to be contained within the authorized dock use area with a possible no overhang restriction at these three BSU's. Babcock proposed a friendly amendment to the motion to clarify that both dock structure and storage of watercraft need to be contained within the Forest Arms HOA authorized dock use area. McUillan and 9euntjens agreed to this. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. · City of Excelsior, new multiple dock license and special density license applications for 116 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 3,120 of shoreline. Foster opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. and asked for background from staff. Harper made the following comments: · The City of Excelsior has submitted new multiple dock license and special density license applications for Board consideration. The primary dock site, the Excelsior Commons, is currently approved for 32 BSU's at lineal docks, 16 overnight BSU's at slides, and eight transient BSU's at a dock structure at the end of Water Street. Five other dock sites, at street ends on Excelsior and Gideons Bay, total another 24 BSU's, for a grand total of 80 BSU's. Although they exceed the 1:50' General Rule for conforming boat density, they are considered a legal, conforming facility because they were granted a special density license on 8/26/87. · Three changes have been proposed at the Excelsior Commons site. First, the applicant has proposed to increase overnight BSU's from 28 to 48 by eliminating the existing 14 lineal docks and replacing them with three dock structures containing 16 BSU's each. Second, the applicant has proposed to increase transient BSU's from eight to 24 BSU's by installing a fourth dock structure containing 16 BSU's to the west of the three overnight storage docks. Third, the applicant has proposed to maintain the same number of slides, four, and related BSU's, 16. However, they have proposed to relocate these slides to other locations within the site. · Four Code Sections apply to the applications submitted for the proposed project. First, Code Section 2.02, subd. 7 requires a new multiple dock license application when there is any change in slip size, ownership, width, height or location of a structure under this section. A new multiple dock license, with public hearing, is required for the applications submitted because they proposed to increase BSU's from 80 to 116. Second, Code Section 2.01, subd. 1 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for the docking and storage of watercraft. Staff has evaluated the proposed site plan and believes that it complies with Code for docking and storage of watercraft within the authorized dock use area. Third, Code Section 2.02, subd. 1 states that no new docks or moodng areas shall be constructed or established after 5/3/78 which provide space for or are used for mooring or docking a greater number of watercraft than one for each 50' of shoreline in existence on 5/2f78, unless authorized to do so by a special density license. The applicant has submitted a special density license application because the proposed project would have a BSU density of 1:27'. Fourth, Code Section 2.05, subd. 2 states that no person shall be issued a multiple dock or moodng area or commercial dock for a facility which provides for a watercraft storage density greater than one watercraft per 50 feet of shoreline, unless a special density license has been issued by the District. Code allows applications for docking of watercraft up to one for each 10' of continuous shoreline, provided the increase in density above the 1:50' General Rule provides public benefit. The applicant has submitted public amenities for the proposed -337- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 4 project. LMCD Code requires a minimum of 27 public amenity points and the applicant has submitted 51 points. · Staff has evaluated the proposed project to determine whether a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) needs to be prepared. The Environmental Quality Board requires a mandatory EAW to be prepared when slip structure and maneuvering space square feet exceed 20,000. HoweVer, a mandatory F_AW was performed by the District in 1996 and the District made a negative declaration on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. The MN DNR has previously concluded that when a mandatory EAW has been previously prepared, another one is not needed until the cumulative dock structure and maneuvering space square feet expansion increases an additional 20,000 square feet, The proposed project would increase structure and maneuvering space square feet from 59,528 to 62,776, an increase of 3,248 of square feet form the approved site plan when a mandatory EAW was prepared in 1996. Thus, the proposed project does not require a mandatory EAW. · The MN DNR waS provided a copy of the applications submitted in compliance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, and no feedback had been received. He recommended that the Board could direct attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the new multiple license and special density license applications for the 2003 season. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Nybeck stated that Myles McGrath, Excelsior City Manager, was in attendance to add additional comments or to address questions or comments from the Board. McGrath stated that there had been a significant amount of sub-committee work with the residents to arrive at the plan that is proposed. One of the goals of this project has been to address the need for additional slips but use less of the shoreline along the Excelsior Commons. He believed that the proposed plan is safer than what currently exists and it would allow a better avenue for folks to visit the Excelsior downtown area. Foster stated that he was supportive of adding additional transient BSU's as destination points for access to downtown Excelsior. However, he suggested that the applicant might want to consider moving the transient dock structure from the west end of the Excelsior Commons to the east end. McGrath stated that the City of Excelsior would take the Foster comment regarding the location of the transient dock into consideration. Nybeck stated that he believed Excelsior planned to construct the first three dock structures in the near future, with thefourth doCk structure that is designated as transient in the future. ExcelsiOr could then make application to designate one of the first three doCk Structures as transient and designate the fourth one as ovemight storage. McGrath. stated that the intention is to construct the first three dock structures, which would conSist'of 48 ovemight storage'.BSU's, to assistin paying for the project~ Effo~S Will the~:take place to raiSe' additional funds for the construction of the fourth dock structure that would be utilized as a transient dock, with pOsSible partial funding through the Legacy Foundation. The BOard discussed a number of issues with McGrath pertaining to the proposed Project including the need for transient Slips and the desired location of them, fetch in' ExcelsiOr BaY that could impact the permanent docks, and costs to rent a BSU at the dock and who woUld qualify for them. Skramstad asked for the net increase in BSU's at the Excelsior Commons site in the proposed project. -338- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 5 McGrath stated that the number of BSU's at the Excelsior Commons site would increase from 80 to 116, with 16 of the additional 36 BSU's being designated for transient use. Suedh asked McGrath how Excelsior planned to deal with parking associated with the proposed project. McGrath stated that parking is always a concern in the Excelsior downtown area. He believed that the majority of the people renting these slips would be residents of the City of Excelsior and that they WOUld not need parking spots because they would either walk to or would be dropped off at the Excelsior Commons. The additional 16 transient BSU's proposed might actually improve the parking situation downtown because visitors would be able to visit by boat rather than by a motor vehicle. Mr. John Uran, 19 Center Street, addressed the proposed location of the transient dock. He believed that the transient dock would be the busiest of the four proposed new docks and there could be compatibility Problems with the charter boat docks on the east end of the:Excelsior Commons. This was taken into consideration in the establishment of the proposed site plan to spread out the boating activity in this area. Mr. Dick Mueller stated that he was an Excelsior City Council member and addressed the parking question. Since the sub-committee in the City of Excelsior was formed last spdng to investigate the possibility of expanding docks along the Excelsior Commons, he stated that he had been documenting the number of boats that were active at one period from the existing overnight storage BSU's. He estimated that this figure was at maximum approximately 10% of the current overnight storage BSU's, or approximately two or three boats. This is the third proposal considered by the City of Excelsior and he believed that the proposed plan best fit the needs of Excelsior residents. It was unanimously approved-by the city council. There being no further comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 7:51 p.m. Babcock stated that the Board considered an application some years ago in Carsons Bay when staff prepared an evaluation of bay density. He recalled that there was discussion that Excelsior Bay had a greater density utilizing an established policy and that he would like to re-address this prior to authorizing an expansion of BSU's in Excelsior Bay. He stated that he had only a few technical issues to deal with in evaluating the proposed project, including slip size dimensions on the proposed site plan and review of a lighting plan. Nybeck stated that when the applications for the commercial facility in Carsons Bay were denied, he recalled that the density policy was not referred to in the Rndings of Fact and order. Foster stated that he had concern about comparing boat densities in Excelsior Bay and CarsonS Bay, noting that Excelsior is much more commercialized with restaurants and multiPle dock facilitieS. He believed that bays, such as Excelsior Bay, are needed with the understanding that there is greater congestion in them. Babcock stated that he was not opposed to the proposed project; however, he would like to have the information for review purposes prior to making a decision on it. Van Hercke stated that she would like an analysis of the potential shoreline the 14 member cities cOuld dedicate towards a special density license, noting that there could be large potential increases in BSU's in the future if these cities maximize the number of BSU's they could be allowed through a special density license. -339- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 6 MOTION: Seuntjens moved, McMiltan seconded to direct attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the new multiple dock license and special density license applications for the 2003 season. Skramstad asked whether an analysis of bay density in Excelsior Bay and the 14 municipalities was made part of the motion. McMillan stated that she would prefer to study bay density separate from the applications submitted by the City of ExCelsior. Bacock stated that he would prefer to review the analysis of bay density in Excelsior Bay prior to deciding on the proposed applications, noting this currently is a subjective criteria for both applications. LeFevere stated in the review of new multiple dock license and special density licenses, one of the subjective criteria is "Whether the proposed facility is compatible with the LMCD watercraft density classification criteria". He believed that it would be feasible to review the policy referred to Babcock and bring it back for review at the same Regular Board Meeting when the draft Findings were being reviewed. The Board discussed whether the boat density policy referred to by Babcock was superseded with the adoption of the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka in the early 1990's. VOTE: Ayes (9), AbStained (1, Babcock); motion carried. Foster stated that in addition to the draft Findings of Fact and Order prepared by LeFevere, he would work with staff to bring back additional boat density policy information requested by Babcock and Van Hercke for review at the same Regular Board Meeting. The Board briefly addressed how the City of Excelsior could address lighting concerns of distinguishing shore lights from boat lights, with the concept that the lighting source should be shielded and not be visible to the boaters, 5th Street Ventures, LLC (Marina Center Site), new multiple dock license application to expand a conforming multiple dock facility from 10 to 13 Boat Storage Units (BSU's). Foster opened the public hearing at 8:22 p.m. and asked for background from staff. Harper made the following comments: · 5th Street Ventures has submitted a new multiple dock license application for the current mUltiPle dock facility, P.M. Pizza Enterprises~ on Seton Channel in the City of Spring Park. The facility is considered a legal, conforming multiple dock with 10 transient BSU's approved on approximately 1,421' of continuous shoreline, with a BSU density of 1:142'. · The applicant has proposed to increase the number of BSU's at this facility from 10 to 13', and to designate all 13 BSU's for overnight storage purposes rather than transient. · Two Code Sections apply to the application submitted for the proposed project. First, Code Section 2.03, subd. 7 requires a new multiple dock license application When there is any change in slip size,.ownership, height or location of structure, or change in use from one of the classifications specified in Section 2.11, subd. 2 to another. Because the proposed project would increase the number of BSU's and would -340- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 20D;Z Page7 change the classification from a 'q'ransient Facility" to a "Commercial Marina Facility", the Code requires a new multiple dock license application, with public headng. Second, Code Section 2,01, subd. 1 prohibits a person from using area of the Lake outside.an authorized dock use area for the docking and storage of watercraft, staff has evaluated the proposed site plan and believes that it complies with Code for docking and storage of watercraft within the authorized dock use area. · Staff has evaluated the proposed project to determine whether a mandatory EAW needs to be prepared. Dock structure and maneuvering space square feet for the propOsed project is 13,683, well below the 20,000 square feet trigger point for a mandatory EAW. · The MN DNR, the City of Spring Park, and the MCWD were provided a copy of the application for review and comments. Mr. Daryl EIlison, MN DNR Areas Fisheries Supervisor, stated that the proposed project is the preferred alternative to the original proposal to dredge into the wetlands along the shore. He expressed no objection, provided no vegetation removal or dredging is permitted with this project or future expansion. Ms. Julie Ekman, MN DNR Area Hydrologist, commented that she had met with the applicant last summer to discuss the applicant's preliminary plans to excavate into the cattails to the east of this site for the creation of a marina. She questioned whether the applicant has plans for expansion of the marina addressed in this application. She stated that although the present application does not create a greater intrusion than already exists, she was concerned about future plans to expand into the cattail fringe. She stated that this vegetation provided filtration for runoff from this area and encroaching in to it could compromise water quality in Seton Lake. The City of Spring Park commented that this site has a long history of transient use. Since the BSU's are proposed to be overnight, they questioned how anticipated transient traffic would be handled and whether instructional signage would be included if transient issues arise. The MCWD has commented that the proposed project at this site does not appear to require permits from the MCWD based on the plans submitted by the applicant. · Although staff has similar concerns to those raised by both the MN DNR and the City of Spring Park, staff recommends the Board could approve the new multiple dock license from 5th Street Ventures, LLC for the 2003 season. Babcock asked for clarification on how a boat would be stored at BSU 1 because there appeared to be wetland and marsh in this location. Mr. Phil Johnson, representing the applicant, stated that the area where BSU 1 is proposed would parallel along the existing dock and that there were no cattails along in this area dudng his observation this past summer. Nelson stated that he had been aware of potential plans for re-development of this area for sometime and that he appreciated the current plan proposed because it does not require the removal of wetlands. It appears that the applicant might consider the proposed project the firet phase of a larger scale project however, there appears to be some concerns raised by other governmental agencies that should be addressed. He expressed concern that the proposed plan would eliminate all of the existing transient slips and replaced them with overnight storage slips. The City of Spring Park addressed this in their comments and he would like the applicant to consider amending their plan to potentially include at least a couple of transient slips; Johnson stated that historically, there has been a place at the end of the dock for a boat to pick-up a pizza, He believed that this would continue in the proposed project. Foster asked for clarification on the relationship between 5th Street Ventures and P.M, Pizza Enterprises. Johnson stated that P.M. Pizza Enterprises is currently a tenant. -341 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 8 Seuntjens expressed concern about the use of the end of the dock for pick-up purposes and ho~v it is affected by the adjacent BSU 12. LeFevere clarified for the Board that Code requires boat storage, whether it is ovemight or transient, to be done at authorized BSU locations. In the case of facilities that are entirely transient, the Board has allowed for the Storage of more than one watercraft in a transient BSU. However, the general rule allowed by Code is one watercraft for each authorized BSU. Skramstad asked for clarification of the 1,421' dedicated to the multiple dock license. Nybeck stated that the 1,421' of dedicated 929.4' shoreline runs from the Seton Channel under County Road 15 to the east of the proposed dock behind the wetland area. Van Hercke asked for clarification of BS'U 13 that is tong the north side of the walkway and is 20.' Wide by 50' long. Ms. Myrna Toivanen_, owner of Fantasia Charter, stated that she had been using this location as a pick-up point and storage location in recent years. Nybeck stated that the charter boat, Fantasia, has been authorized to use this location as a pick-up point in recent years; however, they have not been authorized to park the boat overnight. Unauthorized overnight storage has taken place in recent years and he believed that the proposed project was attempting to address this. Toivanen stated that the proposed location for storage of her charter boat, BSU 13, was very shallow. However, it works well for her charter boat because it has a very shallow draft. There being no further comments, Foster closed the public headng at 8:45 p.m. Foster stated that he had concerns about the proposed site plan because he questioned whether it would serve the needs of the boating public. He stated that he would be supportive of changing the designation of BSU 12 from overnight storage to transient use. Nelson stated that he shared the concerns of Foster, hOWever, he would like to see more than one transient BSU at this facility because he believed that the area demands it. Babcock stated that the Board has generally in the past allowed the owner of the property to decide Whether or not to designate transient slips at a facility. It is possible that the P.M. Pizza Enterprises or All Stars Sports might not be in business some years down the road. The Board might want to place some other restrictions on the annual renewal license to address the concerns of the Board. The Board discussed the proposed dock layout and the size of the BSU's proposed, 32'. There Was question about the location of the wetlands in the area and whether there was enough room to maneuver around the island that has wetlands. There also was question about water depth in the area and whether it would be adequate for 32' long boats. The consensus of the Board was for staff to further investigate the proposed plan to -342- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 page 9 verify whether it would fit in the area, whether it would impaCt the wetlands in the area, and to identify water depths in the area. 1. LAKE USE& RECREATION A. Discussion of pending Red Bull Kite Special Event Application. Foster stated that the applicant discussed the proposed event at the 11/13/02 Regular Board Meeting, noting that a special event application had not been submitted at that time. The Board instructed him to submit a special event application, which he has, and that the Board at this meeting would discuss it further. He asked for feedback or comments from the Board on the proposed special event. Babcock stated that he would like to see a parking and shuttle plan approved by the District. Seuntjens stated that he would like this applicant, and all future special event applicants, to supply the office with a certificate of their liability insurance, naming the District as additional insured. Ambrose stated that he would like further clarification from the applicant on the exact point of access to Lake Minnetonka from Wayzata Bay and where parking on land will occur. Nybeck reported that he had talked to Lt. Johnson and that he was inclined to approve the special event permit for the Sheriff's Water Patrol, subject to the applicant agreeing to comply with all permit requirements established for the event. Babcock stated that he would like to have restrictions placed on commercial activities associated with the proposed event. The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to issue the permit for this proposed event and to allow staff to work out permit conditions with the Sheriff's Water Patrol and the City of Wayzata, subject to taking into consideration the comments discussed by the Board at this meeting. B. Staff analysis of 2002 Hennepin County Shedff's Office Water Patrol project. Foster asked for an overview of the staff memo prepared by Nybeck. Nybeck stated that the total cost for the 2002 project was $49,431.00, down from the proposed budget of $60,000.00. Funding previously agreed to for the 2002 project was 50% from Hennepin County, 30% from the LMCD Member Cities Share, and 20% from the LMCD "Save the Lake" Fund. In April 2001, donations were received in the amount of $14,000 from Lake Minnetonka business commu.n.i~ to offset shortfa!ls for this project dudng the 2001 and 2002 seasons, Because expenditures exceeded voluntary centribution received from the LMCD Member Cities for the 2002 project, he recommended voluntary payment of the LMCD share as follows: · LMCD Member Cities Share- $12,400.00 · Lake Minnetonka Business Community:Share: $2,429,30 · LMCD "Save the Lake" Fund Share- $9,886.20 -343- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting DeCember 18, 2002 Page 10 Nybeck estimated that there is a surplus of approximately $8,433,70 from the Lake Minnetonka Business Community Share. The Lake Minnetonka business community originally requested that any balance of these funds be used for the Hennepin County Shedff's Office Water Patrol equipment fund after 2002. There has been feedback from the Lake Minnetonka business community, pdmafily Gabriel Jabbour, that they would not have a problem with the District maintaining the balance of the business community contributions for future expenses incurred relating to additional DeputieS on Lake Minnetonka. Foster stated that he would further check into the surPluS with Jabbour and report back to the Board. MOTION: Nelson moved, Skramstad seconded to approve payment for the 2002 Water Patrol project as recommended in the 12/12/02 staff memo. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Babcock asked for an update on the funding status for this project in 2003. Skramstad stated that he would update the Board on this under "New Business". C. Review of Draft 2002 Lake MinnetOnka Shoreline Boat Count. Foster stated that he had reviewed the draft Report and that he believed it was pretty self-explanatory. He asked if there were any comments or feedback on the draft Report. Nybeck stated that the 10,509 watercraft documented in the 2002 Lake Minnetonka Shoreline Boat Count was greater than the previous historical high of 10,475 in 1996. He recommended that the Board should direct Staff to conduct the same study in 2003 to confirm the 2002 results. The 2002 Lake Minnetonka Shoreline Boat Count Report was accepted by the Board as submitted, The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to conduct the Lake Minnetonka Boat Shoreline Count in 2003, encouraging Board members to participate in the project when the study is being 'conducted in their municipality. D. Additional Business. There was no' additional business. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE. A. ConSide. ra'tion of seale.d bids' received for the put'chase of a new AqUatic Plant Harvester. Foster asked Nybeck for an update on this agenda item. Nybeck made the following comments: · At the 11/13/02 Regular Board Meeting, the Board directed staffto: 1) advertise for competitive bids, through a Request for PropoSal (RFP), for the purchase Of a new Aquatic Plant Harvester and the trade-in of two of the 1989 United Marine International harvesters, and 2) solicit comments on the specifications sent out through the RFP. -344- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 11 · To comply with the direction from the Board, staff sent out a RFP for sealed bids to Alpha Boats Unlimited, Aquamarine, Aquarius Systems, Inland Lake Harvesters, and United Marine International on 11/15/02. Comments were due in the District office on 12/3/02, with changes made to the specifications through Addendum #1, which was faxed and mailed to all five vendors on 12/4/02. Sealed bids were due in the District office by 12 NOON, CST, on 12/12/02. · All five vendors submitted sealed bids by the 12 NOON CST deadline on 12/12/02, Sealed bids were reviewed by Harper and himself, noting that a bid tabulation spreadsheet had been prepared that summarized the Sealed bids received. · Based on staff review, they believed that Aquamarine was a non-responsive bid because it did not meet minimum specifications in three areas. First, section 6.2 required a minimum 100 U.S. gallon capacity fuel tank(s) painted and labeled for diesel fuel. Aquamarine has proposed a 26 gallon fuel tank for the new Aquatic Plant Harvester. Second, Section 6.5 requires a minimum capacity of 65 gallons for the hydraulic reservoir. Aquamarine has proposed a 50 gallon hydraulic reservoir for the new Aquatic Plant Harvester. Third, Section 9.10 requires' a payment of 90% of the purchase price to be paid upon delivery, with the remaining 10% retainer due 30 days after successful lake trails and removal of used harvesters, Aquamarine has proposed a payment plan of 10% payment with Order of the new Aquatic Plant Harvester and balanCe due at delivery. · The lowest, responsible bid that meets the minimum specifications is Aquarius Systems. If the Board decides to aWard the contract to Aquarius SYstems rather than AqUamarine, We recommend two alternatiVes ProPOsed at no additional cost bY AquaduS Systems. First, staff recommends the retractable paddle wheels rather than the removable paddle wheels With jib crane. SeCond, staff recommends the CUmmins B3.3-85 diesel engine rather than the Kubota V2003,TE diesel engine. · He recommended that the Board: 1) reject the bid submitted by Aquamarine beCause it is non- responsive for the reasons detailed in the 12/16/02 staff memo, and 2) award the contract to Aquadus Systems for the purchase of a new Aquatic Plant Harvester for a net total bid of $94,300 (excluding federal, state, and local taxes). He also recommended a second motion to change the type of paddle wheels and diesel engine aS outlined above. · He entertained queStions or comments from the Board. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Babcock seconded to: 1) reject the bid submitted by Aquamarine because it is non-responsive for the reasons detailed in the 12/16/02 staff memo, and 2) aWard the contract to Aqu,arius Systems for the purchase of a new Aquatic Plant Harvester for a net total bid of $~4,300.00 (excluding federal, state, and local taxes) Babcock recommended a friendly amendment to the motion to change the type of paddle wheels 'and diesel 'engine as recommended i'n the 12/16102 staff memo. Skramstad agreed to thiS. VOTE: MOti°h carried unanimously. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 3. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (11/16/02 - 11/30/02) and (12/1/02 - 12/15/02). Skramstad reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. -345- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page12 m MOTION: Skramstad moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously B. October financial summary and balance sheet. Skramstad reviewed the October financial summary and balance sheet as submitted. The Board accepted the October financial summary and balance sheet as submitted. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. SAVE THE LAKE A. Discussion of 2003 Lake Minnetonka solar light project. McMillan stated that there was discussion at the 11/13/02 Board Meeting about pumhasing solar lights from unspent funds of the 2002 "Save the Lake" Budget, She indicated that after conversations with Nybeck, she believed that solar lights for the 2003 project could be purchased from the 2003 "Save the Lake" Budget. She encouraged Board members to review the channel buoy locations spreadsheet so that they are better prepared at a future Board Meeting to discuss the top five areas where they would like program expanded in 2003. The Board bdefly discussed a map provided from Tony Brough of Hennepin County that identified current solar-light locations and recommended areas that he proposed for 2003. The Board also bdefly discussed how the solar lights were attached to the buoys in 2002 and plans being made to improve this in 2003. The consensus of the Board was that feedback from the public in 2002 was positive towards the pilot project. The Board directed McMillan to purchase a red and green two-mile solar light for review by the Board at a future Meeting. B. Consideration of 2002 Hennepin County Shedff's Office Water Patrol outstanding Special Deputy award candidates. · Foster stated that Lt, Brian Johnson forwarded two candidates for consideration by the Board to be recognized at the upcoming "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner as the 2002 SPecial Deputy of the Year, The candidates were John Emtson and Tracy Hogan. Lt. Johnson has stated that either' candidate would, be a very good choice. He suggested that the Board might want to consider Tracy Hogan because John Emtson has been recognized two times previously as the Special Deputy of the Year. MOTION: Suerth moved, McMillan seconded to honor Tracy Hogan as the 2002 Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol Special Deputy of the Year. Babcock stated that if the Shedffs Water Patrol would like to have a past winner of this award be repeated in the future, further clarification on why would benefit the Board in making their decision. -346- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 13 VOTE: Ayes (9), Nayes (1, Skramstad); motion carried. C. Additional Business. McMillan provided a brief update on the guest speaker who has been secured for the 2/13103 "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner, Mr, Todd Warner has agreed to speak at the annual banquet dinner and the topic will be "Vintage Boats: Then and Now". 5. ADMINISTRATION A. Election of 2003 LMCD Board Officers (Discussion of recommendations from the nominating committee). Foster asked for an update from Babcock who chaired the nominating committee for 2003 LMCD Board Officers. Babcock stated that he had recently been in contact with the other members of the nominating to discuss recommendations for 2003 LMCD Board Officers. The consensus of the nominating committee was to maintain the 2002 LMCD Board Officers for 2003. Contacts have been made with the 2002 LMCD Board Officers regarding continuing in their current positions in 2003 and they all have expressed interest in continuing, Recommendations for 2003 LMCD Board Officers from the nominating committee were: Bert Foster- Chairman · Craig Nelson- Vice Chairman · Lili McMillan- Secretary · Tom Skramstad- Treasurer MOTION: Babcock moved, Skramstad seconded to accept the slate of Officers as recommended by the nominating committee for 2003 LMCD Board Officers be recognized. Seuntjens asked Babcock who was on the nominating committee in addition to himself. Babcock stated that other Board members on the nominating committee were Suerth, Van Hercke, and Wert. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Babcock opened the floor for any other additional slate of Officers for the 2003 LMCD Board. MOTION: Babcock moved, Skramstad seconded to close nominations for 2003 LMCD Board Officers, VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Ambrose moved, Burma seconded to approve the nominations from the nominating committee for 2003 LMCD Board Officers. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business, -347- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 6.WATER STRUCTURES A. Page 14 Staff recommends Board approval of partial refunds of $250 deposits for approved variances as outlined in 12/10/02 staff memo. MOTION: McMillan moved, Skramstad seconded to approve partial refunds of $250 deposits for approved variances as outlined in the 12J10/02 staff memo. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business, 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck updated the Board on the following: · The monthly Executive DirectOr Newsletter was included in the handout folders for informational purposes. · The lake level as of 12/10/02 was 928.61', with the Grays Bay Dam closed. · A great deal of Work has recently been done on updates to the District Personnel Policy for its employees. The Personnel Policy sub-committee from a few years ago included current Board members Nelson and Babcock, and past Board member Gene Partyka. He asked BOard member Babcock if he wanted to continue on this sub-committee and if there were other Board members interested in serving on it. Babcock stated that he would need to bow out from the Personnel Policy sub-committee; however, Skramstad stated that he would serve in his place. Nybeck stated that LeFevere has recently forwarded an affidavit to the City of Shorewood that summarized his understanding on jurisdictional question between the District and the 14 member cities. He asked LeFevere to provide further clarification of this affidavit. LeFevere stated that he believed it has been the position of the Board over the years that the District has concurrent jurisdiction with the MN DNR and the 14 member cities. This means that the public needs to comply with all jurisdictions involved around the lake. There is another conservation district in the State of Minnesota that has been created by heady identical state enabling legislation on White Bear: Lake. That they generally are not nearly as active and do not have as comprehensive a set of ordinances as the District. There is a current zoning dispute between the City of Shorewood and the ShorewoOd Yacht Olub. That the attorney representing· Shorewood Yacht Club has made the assumption that the establishment of the District pre-empted the authority of cities on Lake Minnetonka to regulate. The case cited by the attorney is the Ci~ of'BirchwoOd v. si~es that was decided by the Minnesota Court of Appeals in 1998. The court ruled, on a divided vote, that the enabling act of the White Bear Lake Conservation District (WBLCD) Preempted the authority of the City of BirchWOod. In this case, the WBLCD had no restriction on the size of boat that could be parked at a dock;' however, the City of Birchwood did have restrictions. The City of Birchwood attempted to enforce its restrictions and the MN Court of Appeals ruled that the WBLCD state enabling legislation preempted the'city from doing so. There is a doctdne of law called preemption of the field. The legislature does not always make 'it abundantly clear on defining what jurisdictions have powers. Because of this, it was up to the court to clarify what the state legislature intended. The attorney for the City of Shorewood has contacted both him and the office asking for clarification on the position of the District. He stated that he believed the Distdct has always taken the position that there is concurrent -348- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Eegular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 15 jurisdiction with the 14 member cities and that it is referenced in several areas of the Code. The City of Shorewood asked that his position be clarified further in writing and he prepared the affidavit included in the handout folder. He hoped that this was satisfactory with the Board to continue good working relationships with the I4 member cities, He concluded that he had a copy of the City of Birchwood v, Simes case for informational purposes for the Board. Foster asked if the ruling of the Minnesota Court of Appeals is the ruling unless it is challenged and overturned by the Minnesota State Supreme Court. LeFevere stated that it is the prevailing law to be used by the District courts. If there is a preemption of the field and the Board believes that there should be concurrent jurisdiction with member cities on the lake, one way to address it would be to have the District state enabling law clarified to provide that it does not preempt the authority of the cities. Foster stated that he would have concerns about the cities preempting the District authority for lakewide policies such as speed limit and minimum wake restrictions. LeFevere stated that he did not believe that would happen on Lake Minnetonka because a municipality would only have surface water authority if the lake were entirely within that municipality. He clarified that he believed that the position of the attorney for the Shorewood Yacht Club is that the City of Shorewood ordinance in question is invalid because the District supersedes the city jurisdiction. Babcock asked LeFevere why the affidavit was prepared, noting that he hoped it did not place the District on one side of the parties in question, LeFevere stated that he prepared the affidavit at the request of the City of Shorewood. The concept of the affidavit was to state the facts rather than support the City of Shorewood in its prosecution of the Shorewood Yacht Club. He stated that he did not intend to send out a document that was not consistent with the intent of the Board of Directors. He preferred that he would have had feedback from the Board; however, it was not feasible because of the District Board Meeting schedule and the timing of the affidavit request from the City of Shorewood, The Board further discussed this matter and the consensus of the Board was that the Board should probably discuss future documents similar to this before they are sent out. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. 9. NEW BUSINESS Skramstad asked for an update on the vacant Board position from the City of Victoria. Foster stated that he had been in recent contact with the Mayor and that he would follow-up on it again, Skramstad asked for an update on the discussions with the City of Minnetrista on the wetlands ordinance adopted this past summer and whether adjustments could be made to it so the residents on Six Mile Creek can Continue historical use. -349- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 18, 2002 Page 16 Babcock stated that he had been unsuccessful in contacting the city administrator from the City of Minnetrista. He informed the Board that he would keep them up to date on any conversations he has with the City of Minnetrista. Skramstad updated the Board on funding of the 2003 Water Patrol project by Hennepin County. He stated that the 2003 Hennepin County Budget has recently been finalized and that Hennepin County will fund 100% of this project in 2003. The Board applauded the efforts of Skramstad. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION. Performance of Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to conduct evaluation in closed session). MOTION: Nelson moved, Ambrose seconded to go into executive session at 10:45 p.m. to conduct a performance evaluation of the Executive Director, as allowed by the Open Meeting Law. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously, 11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -350- CALL TO ORDER LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, December 18, 2002 Tonka Bay City Half ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · 36th Annual "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner, 2/13/03 at Lord Fletcher's Old Lake Lodge READING OF MINUTES- 11/13/02 LMCD Regular BOard Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) PUBLIC HEARINGS · Forest Arms Homeowners Association, new multiple dock license application to reconfigure 14 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) at the non-conforming facility. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration City of Excelsior, new multiple dock license and special density license applications for 116 Boat Storage Units on (BSU's) on 3120' of shoreline. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration 5th Street Ventures, LLC (Marina Center site), new multiple dock license application to expand a conforming multiple dock facility from 10 to 13 Boat Storage Units (BSU's). 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration LAKE USE & RECREATION A) Discussion of pending Red Bull Kite Freeze Special Event Application:; B) Staff analysis of 2002 Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol project; C) Review of Draft 2002 Lake Minnetonka Shoreline Boat Storage Count; D) Additional Business; EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A) Consideration of sealed bids received for the purchase of a new Aquatic Plant Harvester (handout); B) Additional Business; -351 - 3. FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (11/16/02 - 11/30/02) and (12/1/02 - 12/15/02); B) October financial summary and balance sheet; C) Additional Business; 4. SAVE THE LAKE A) Discussion of 2003 Lake Minnetonka solar light project; B) Consideration of 2002 Hennepin County Shedffs Office Water Patrol outstanding Special Deputy award candidates; C) Additional Business; 5. ADMINISTRATION A) Election of 2003 LMCD Board Officers (Discussion of recommendations from the nominating committee); B) Additional Business; 6. WATER STRUCTURES A) Staff recommends Board approval of partial refunds of $250 deposits for approved variances as outlined in 12/10/02 staff memo; · B) Additional Business; 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9, NEW BUSINESS 10, EXECUTIVE SESSION- Performance Evaluation of Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to conduct evaluation in closed session) 11. ADJOURNMENT -352- DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, November 13, 2002 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMillan, Orono; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Orv Burma, Mound; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Sheldon Weft, Greenwood; Victoria has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster Foster made two Chair Announcements: · The 11/28/02 Regular LMCD Board Meeting has been cancelled due to the Thanksgiving Holiday. ,, The 12/11/02 and 12/25/02 Regular LMCD Board Meetings have been consolidated to 12/18/02. Gilman arrived at 7:11 p.m. READING OF MINUTES- 10/9/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Babcock moved, Nelson seconded to approve the minutes from the 10/9/02 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda. Mr. Phil Mero, Field Marketing Director'for Red Bull North Amedca, stated that Red Bull is a non-alcoholic beverage that is a global product and has been in the United States for around five years. The cornerstone of Red Bull's marketing program is working with athletes and developing sPecial events. He proposed the first annual Red Bull Kite Freeze event on Lake Minnetonka. The same special event was proposed last winter; hoWever, it did not take place because of thin-ice and timing concems. The special event is proposed this winter fro~ January 17th through January 19th. He circulated and provided an overview of a two-page summary sheet that provided further background on Red Bull North America and the details of the proposed special event. The event itself would be Iow- key and geared for the athletes rather than the spectators. He entertained comments or questions from the Board. Foster stated that since a special event application had not been submitted, he believed that one should be submitted and that it could be discussed in further detail at the 12/18/02Regular Board Meeting: One concern that he believed that the Board might have is noise generated from the special event. -353- Lake MinnetOnka Conservation District RegUlar BOard Meeting November 13, 2002 Page 2 The Board discussed a few other items, relating to the proposed special event. Some of these items included the need to stage parking, what part of Wayzata Bay Would be impacted by the proposed course, and the possible need for addressing advertising associated with the event. CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member request discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Ambrose moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include: 3B, September financial summary and balance sheet; 4B, Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Significant Activity Report; and 5A, Minutes from the 10/30/02 "Save the Lake" ,Advisory Committee Meeting. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE .. A. Review of draft "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka RePort and Recommendations: 2002 Pilot Inspection Program". Foster asked for an overview of the draft Report from Dick Osgood, Mr. Dick Osgood, Executive Director for the Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA), stated that he recently prepared the draft Report with Nybeck. The results of the veliger sampling program conducted by the LMA this past summer revealed that zebra mussels have not been introduced into Lake Uinnetonka. He discussed the number and location of sites associated with the sampling program. He noted that the 2002 pilot inspection program went well and that the inspections communicated meaningful messages to boaters before they launched their watercraft on Lake Minnetonka. It is recommended that the 2002 pilot program be continued and expanded in 2003 with more public accesses covered, longer hours of coverage, a longer season, and an expansion of the educational message to include other exotic species. A key element of this program would be to utilize volunteers to 'adopt an access' to supplement the MN DNR inspectors. This could include church groups or local Rotary groups. The expanded program in 2003 has an estimated budget of $77,000. This includes funds for MN DNR inspectors, a volunteer COordinator, materials and shirts for the volunteers, educational materials, LMA program management, funds for developing and hosting a workshop for training madna staff, and a special events liaison/coordinator. The LMA is attempting to raise funds for this project in 2003, noting that the Legacy Foundation has pledged $5,000 to this program. He reviewed the implementation schedule for this project in 2003, noting that it could be modified. He entertained questions or comments from the Board, Foster asked how much is budgeted in the 2003 Exotics Budget for zebra mussel expenditures. Nybeck stated that $5,000 was budgeted in 2003, noting that the Board could COnsider supplementing this' with "Save the Lake" funds if that is.the desire of the Board, In the 2002 Pilot project, up to $3,000 of "Save the Lake" funds were dedicated, for. this project. McMillan stated that she would like to continue the monitoring program to sample for veligers as well as the inspection program. Babcock stated that the Board might want to consider re-implementing the billboard campaign used a few years ago to educate the public. He suggested that a suspended disk monitoririg Prograrh Should be considered near commercial marinas and public accesses because they would be cost effective. -354- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board' Meeting NOvember 13, 2002 page3 McMillan stated that she would like to see a meeting coordinated in eady 2003 with the commercial marina's to get their input on this issue, noting that this could be coordinated in conjunction With this program. She added that some thought should be given to a scaled back program in 2003 in case not enough funding is raised, Foster provided an overview of the funding problems he believed that the MN DNR is facing to fund this type of a program, noting that this is complicated with the proposed budget deficit of the State of Minnesota. If this program is to be expanded in 2003, he believed that the funds would need to be raised locally, primarily by the LMA. The consensus of the Board was that they were supportive of the expanding this program in 2003 and that the District may be supportive of partial funding for it at an undetermined amount. The majority of the funding still needs to be raised by the LMA and the Board was supportive of their efforts in raising these funds. B, Update of 10/23/02 EWM Harvesting Program Working Group Meeting. Foster asked for an update on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that an EWM Harvesting Program Working Group Meeting was conducted in the District office on 10/23/02 to evaluate the 2002 season, and to discuss potential changes to improve the program for 2003. In addition to Nybeck, Board members Suerth, Babcock, and Van Hercke; EWM Project Manager Judd Harper; Site Supervisor John Evans; and EWM Fleet Mechanic Steve Ourfman were also in attendance. The three primary topics discussed at this meeting were personnel evaluation, condition of the EWM harvesting equipment, and evaluation of the EWM harvesting program capital equipment. There are two recommendations of the Working Group for consideration by the Board. First, the Working Group recommends the Board direct staff to advertise for competitive bids, through a request for proposal (RFP), for the purchase of a new Aquatic Plant Harvester and the trade-in of up to two of the original United Marine International (UMI) harvesters. Second, the Working Group recommends the Board direct staff to solicit comments on the specifications sent out through the RFP. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. LeFevere stated that this is the opportunity for the Board to further refine the specifications, noting that there are a number of options in how to deal with the Districts used harvesters. One option could include vendors having to bid a trade4n for both used harvestersl nbtirig that the advantages of th s optiOn include getting r d of the harveSte~ '~nd making it eas ei to'deCide o.n'the bid~"rede Ved. A disadvantage °fth s option s that it could discodrage vendors frOm' submitt nga b d There are a number of 0ther.oPtions for the Board to consider; however, they get'~ore cOmPiicated. ESSential¥1 tliese options COUld inCludepurchasing a new harvester and selling part of the used Distdct harvesters, noting that this could give the Board some flexibility when they are making a decision on the bids received. Nybeck cautioned the Board that it might not make sense to pumhase a new h'arvester unless at least one of the used harvesters can be traded in. Hennepin County has expressed concern about the space requ red for the storage of the harvesting equipment. The City of Minn%POliS has recently purchased a new harvester and they required the vendor to bid a trade-in value for one of their used harvesters. LeFevere Stated that in the bid ProCess for the City of Minneapo is., the instructions and bid form stated that the vendor Will proVide an alloWance for trade-in of one of their used harvesters. -355- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 2002 Page4 Nelson stated that he believed it would make the most sense to require a trade-in for the two used District harvesters at this point, noting that bids could be redone' if the vendors do not provide enough allowance for trade-in. He believed that it would make the most sense to get rid of the used Harvesters at this point. Nybeck stated that there is a comment period included in the draft specifications that allows for feedback from the vendors. If the vendors comment that they do not want to alloW for trade-in of the two used District harvesters, he believed that changes could be made to Specifications through an Addendum. Babcock stated that he would be supportive for trading in both of the used harvesters. Foster stated that he' would be supportive to provide the vendors more than one option relating to trade-in for the District used harvesters because if would allow for more flexibility. MOTION: Nelson moved, Gilman seconded to direct staff to: 1) advertise for competitive bids, through a RFP, for the purchase of a new Aquatic Plant Harvester and the trade-in of two of the original UMI harvesters, and 2) to solicit comments on the specifications sent out through the RFP. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. ADMINISTRATION A, Appointments for 2003 · Auditor Selection · Legal Counsel · PrOsecuting Attorney · Bookkeeper · Official Newspaper · Bank Depository Resolution for fiscal year 2003 MOTION: Gilman moved, Suerth seconded to approved the following 2003 appointments: 2002 Auditor Selection- Abdo, Eick, & Meyers; Legal CoUnsel- Kennedy & Graven; Prosecuting Attorney- Tallen & Baertschi; Bookkeeper- SB Management, Inc.; Official Newspaper- Lakeshore Weekly News; and Bank Depository for'2003- First National Bank of the Lakes. VOTE: MOtion carded unanimously. B. Discussion of proposal to change health insurance for LMCD employees to Health Partners. Foster asked fOr an overview of this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that full,time District employees currently have medical insurance with Medica and he was investigating the possibility of changing HMO's to Health Partners effective January 1st, with possibility of adding dental insurance for full-time emploYees if it is economically feasible. Health Partners has submitted proposed medical and dental plans, Open Access Choice 15-100% and Standard Choice, that would cost -356- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 2002 Page 5 the District $430.94 per month for the District's full-time employees. This plan would reduce the monthly expenditure of the District by $59.40 and would provide its full-time employees with dental coverage that they do not currently enjoy, He recommended that the Board direct staff to terminate the District's medical insurance with Medica effective 12/31/02, to enroll the District's full-time employees for medical insurance with Health Partners effective 1/1/03 in the Open Choice Access 15-100% Plan, and to enroll the District's full-time employees for dental insurance with Health Partners effective 1/1/03 in the Standard ChOice Plan. Suerth asked if District employees currently pay for any of the costs associated with insurance. Nybeck stated that current personnel policy pays 100% of medical coverage for its full-time employees and 25% of medical coverage for their dependents. Updates to the District Personnel Policy are needed and will be worked on in the near future, Suerth stated that he believed that employees may have to contribute to the payment of insUrance in the future because of the escalating costs. However, he supported the current proposal made by Nybeck to change insurance to Health Partners because of the reduction in costs to the District. Gilman questioned whether it would be appropriate to add dental insurance at this time because of the economic environment raiSed by Suerth. Ambrose stated that he would be supportive of medical and dental insurance with Health Partners because the monthly premium for this insurance would be less than the current monthly premium for medical insurance with Medico. Nelson stated his previous experience was that there is a need to review insurance plans annually with the vadous HMO's to meet both the needs of the Distdct and its full-time employees, If dental insurance is mom expensive in the future, the Board might have to consider either taking it away or having the employees pay for all or pad of it. Any changes to policy relating to benefits for its full-time employees should be incorporated in the updated District Personnel Policy, with one possibility including a cafeteria plan. The con sensus of the Board was that review of insurance and other benefits for its full-time employees required annual approval by the Board and is subject to changes. MOTION: Ambrose moved, Nelson seconded to direct Nybeck to: 1) terminate the District's medical insurance with Medica effective 12/31/02, 2) enroll the District's full-time employeesfor medical insurance with Health Partners effective 111103 in the Open Choice Access 15,100.% Plan, and 3) enroll the District's fulNime employees for dental insurance with Health Partners in the Standard Choice Plan. Ambrose clarified his motion that benefits for full-time employees for the Distdct will be reviewed by the Board in near future and shall be subject to annual review. VOTE: Unanimously carried. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. -357- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 2002 3. FINANCIAL ~ A. Audit of vouchers ((10/16/02- 10/31/02) and (11/1/02- 11/15/02). Page 6 Foster reviewed the audit of vOuchere as submitted. MOTION: Gilman moved, Knudsen seconded to aPprove the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Additional Business. Nybeck stated that there was a memo included in the handout folder that summarized District investments, LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Report from the Chair of the 10/31/02 Annual Meeting with the Hennepin COUnty Sheriffs Office water Patrol. Foster reported that he believed that the annual meeting with the Sheriff's Water Patrol was productive and that there was a meeting report in the packet that summarized it, There was some concern aboUt whether the two extra Deputies for the 2003 boating season would be fully funded by Hennepin County, Board member Skramstad has checked further into this and has been informed that it still would be funded 100% by Hennepin County in their 2003 budget, unless changes are made before it is approved in the middle of December. He stated that he would keep the Board informed on this project. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. SAVE THE LAKE B. Report from 10/30/02 "Save the Lake" Advisory Committee Meeting. McMillan stated that the 2002 solar-light pilOt Project was discuSSed at this meeting, with Plans for 2003. Two issues discussed relating to the program inOluded the need for flashing lights and the costs associated with one-mile versus two-mile lights, She stated that a spreadsheet had been prepared by Harper that identifies potential ,channel areas around Lake Minhetonka for expansion of the program in 2003. She suggested that 'BOard members review the spreadsheet and identify Proposed areas Where the program could be expanded in 2003, noting that SOlar-lights Co~ld potehtiallY be pUChased :before the end of the 2002 calendar year if extra "Save the Lake" funds are 'available: She recommended that further discussion of this agenda item be scheduled for the 12/18/02 Regular Board Meeting. Babcock stated that he Would like to see improvements made to how the Solar-lightS are attached to the buoys in 2003, Harper stated that he would be investigating further into this with Tony Brough from Hennepin CoUnty Environmental Services so that both the District and his needs are met. C. Additional Business, There was no additional business. -358- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 2002 Pal]e 7 6. WATER STRUCTURES There was no discussion. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck stated that the monthly Executive Director Report was included in the handout folder that summarized staff activities for the period between 10/8/02 and 11/12/02. He reviewed a letter that was sent out in late September to Howards Point Marina that summarized a multiple dock inspection conducted this past summer. In this letter, concern was raised about some boats being stored in unauthorized locations, some illegal dock sections being installed in the water, and concern was raised that unauthorized drystacking might be occurring because over 30 watercraft were being observed across the street in an organized manner. Feedback has been received from the attorney representing Howards Point Marina and he asked LeFevere to update the Board on his discussion with him. LeFevere stated that the Howards Point Marina attorney indicated that the activity of storing watercraft across the street has been going on for a number of years and that they were just made aware of the ordinances pertaining to it. If it is true that the activity has gone on for a number of years and they can document it legally existed before the grandfather date, they could be licensed for such activity and back licensed. He stated that he had explained the application process to do this. However, the Howards Point Marina attorney claimed that the parking lot across the street is separated by a public right-of-way from the private launching and the contracts are different from the commercial marina slip tenants. The attorney further explained that the watercraft are launched by the owners of the watercraft rather than Howards Point Marina staff, primarily LeFevere assumed at the Howards Point Marina private access. Nybeck stated that he had contacted Howards Point Marina prior to the 2002 season and communicated to them the definition of drystacking, especially the parking of boats across the street in an organized fashion and the launching of them through their pdvate access. He was told that if contracts were prepared for this type of activity and revenue was exchanged, it qualified as drystacking and it needed to cease immediately, Howards Point Marina claimed prior to the season that drystacking was not taking place; however, concern was identified based on the inspection conducted in 2002. He stated that he and LeFevere were looking for direction on how to proceed with the Howards Point Marine renewal, without change, multiple dock license application for the 2003 season, LeFevere stated that the Howards Point Marina attorney indicated that he knew what drystacking is, adding that he did not believe the activity occurring at Howards Point Madna would qualify as drystacking. He stated that drystacking is more of a term used by the District; however, the Code uses the term off-lake storage facilities defined as a business in conjunction with a commercial dock or launching ramp. With the 2003 renewal application being due in the near future, he believed that this would be a good time to make a determination on whether the activity occurring at Howards Point Marina qualifies as a off-lake storage facility. Gilman questioned whether the parking spaces being discussed are included in the conditional use permit with the City of Shorewood. Nybeck stated that he had researched this with the City of Shorewood and that Howards Point Marina exists as a legal, non-conforming facility and does not have a conditional use permit. -359- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 2002 Page 8 The Board discussed this matter further, noting that there might be a need to review this policy and make changes to the ordinance, if needed. The Board directed LeFevere to write a letter to Howards Point Marina to further investigate this matter, including requesting a copy of the contract, noting that approval of their 2003 multiple dock license application could be impacted by the outcome of this investigation. The Board directed staff to notify Howards Point Madna that the other twO points referenced in the inspection letter need to be cleared up prior to the 2003 season. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION. Performance of Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to conduct evaluation in closed session). MOTION: Knudsen moved, Babcock seconded to go-into executive session at 8:55 p.m. to conduct a performance evaluation of the Executive Director, as allowed by the Open Meeting Law. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:03 p.m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -360- Page l of 4 Kandis Hanson From: Sent: Subject: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn. us> Friday, December 13, 2002 1:49 PM Westonka.news Westonka. news Vol. 3, No. 10 December 13, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. Westonlmnews publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. Contents 1. News Briefs --MWHS Volleyball Team Earns All Conference Academic Honors -Westonka Grad Featured in Star Wars Episode II DVD -Winter Community Ed Registration Begins' December 16 --Clothing Drive for Chinese Orphanages 2. Focus Topic: Shirley Hills Teacher Yolanda Clark Named to "Who's Who Among America's Teachers" 3. Upcoming Events 4. How Are We Doing? NEWS BRIEF S **MWHS Volleyball Team earns All Conference Academic Honors** The Mound Westonka High School Girls' Volleyball team has received this year's Metro Alliance Conference All Academic Award. The honor goes to the team with the highest class ranking average in the Metro Alliance Conference. The Metro Alliance comprises Benilde-St. Margaret, Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Fridley, Orono, St. Anthony, and Westonka. Coach Sarah Heyer commended her team for earning the honor, noting, "It's a great achievement for the girls and an example of how well'munded these student athletes are." - 361 - 12/18/2002 Page 2 of 4 **Westonka Grad Featured in Star Wars Episode II DVD** MWHS alumnus Daniel Crregoire, Class of 1990, appears i~the doCUmentary included in the DVD release of"Star Wars Episode Two." Gregoire, the pre-visualization supervisor on the Star Wars film, is featured on disk two, in a documentary rifled, "State of the Art: The Pre-visualization of Episode II." Viewers can access this feature through the main menu under "Documentaries." Crregoire is the son of Julie and Karl Yeager. **Winter Community Ed Registration Begins December 16'* Registration for the. Winter 2003 session of Westonka Community Education classes begins at 8 a.m., Monday, December 16. The class catalogue was mailed earlier this week, and is available online at www. westonka, kl2mnUs/c0med/~t_aJog, html **Clothing Drive for Chinese Orphanages** Shirley Hills students and teachers are inviting all to parmer with Children's Home Society of Minnesota in a service project to provide winter clothing to orphanages in china. You can help by sending new winter clothing to school with your Shirley Hills student, or by dropping items off in a special box outside-the Shirley Hills school office. Children's HOme Society will transport the items to orphanages in China. What is Needed: New wimer clothing for ages 0-10 years old. Girls' clothing is the greatest need, but boys' items can be used, as well. Items like sweaters, pants, coats, snowsuits, hats, and mittens are recommended. Please bring items to the box outside the Shirley Hills ~ee during. the week of December 16-20. ~'~:~ :' '" ' ' "' .... ' FOCUS TOPIC **Shirley Hills Teacher Yolanda Clark Named to "~°'sm° A~nong .- 362 - 12/18/2002 Page 3 of 4 America's Teachers"** Yolanda Clark, a first grade teacher at S~ley ~lls primary School, is one ora select group of teachers honored in the seventh edition of "Who's Who Among America's Teachers." Every two years, the "Who's Who" program honors the most respected · teachers in America's schools. Clark was nominated by former student, Lindsey Isaacson (MWHS 'Class of 2002), for consideratiOn as one of the most influential educators in the .region. Clark recently marked her 30th year of teaching in the Westonka Public Schools. Congratulations to Yolanda Clark on this wonderful recognition! UPCOMING EVENTS -December 15, Popsingers Holiday ShOws, 3 p,m. and 7 p;m.:~ MOund Westonka High School ~ . --December 16, Grade 7 Choir Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School --December 17, Grade 5 Band Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School --DeCember 1.8, Hilltop Crmde Two to Old Log Theater --December 20, Last Day of School Before Winter Break ' --December 23-January 5, Winter Break -January 6, School Resumes Home Athletic Events (for more sports schedules, go to www. mshsl, org/_mshsl/schoolp_ag¢~. ? school=314 --December 17, Boys Basketball vs. Delano; Gr. 9, 4:30 p.m.; Gr. 10, 6 p.m., Varsity, 7:30 p.m.; Mound Westonka High School Gym --December 18, Girls' Basketball vs,: Columbia Heights;.Gr 9, 4:30 p.m.; JV, 6 p.m.; Varsitiy, 7:30 p.m.,~ Mound Westonka High School Gym -December 20, Girls Varsity Hockey vs~eapolis,: 7 p;m., Pond Arella ~ ~ --December 20, Varsity Wrestling Quad with Annandale, Rockford and Roseville, 5 p.m., Mound Westonka High School Gym BONDS AND LEVIES Levies are for Learning (paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries, utilities, and bus service) An operating levy was approved by voters in September 2002. Bonds are for Buildings .- 363 - 12/18/2002 Page 4 of 4 (keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such as computers) A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001. HOW ARE WE DOING? We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. E-mail: welisten~westonka_k12.mn, u.q District Feedback Line: 952.491.8260 Mail: Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <~lsonb_@westonka. kl 2.mnm> · It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 welisten@westonka, kl 2.rn~.us http://www, westonka, kl 2.mn. m Westonka. news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to the State of Mirmesota, the subscriber hst for this newsletter/is public dam . _~3~6~4 _ 12/18/2002 Bonnie Ritter From: To: Sent: Subject: "Kandis Hanson" <KandisHanson@cityofmound.com> "Bonnie Ritter" <BonnieRitter@cityofmound.com> Friday, December 20, 2002 11:33 AM Fw: Westonka.news Please rm~ a hard copy of this and put it in my box. Thanks! Kandis ..... Original Message ..... From: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb~westonka.k 12.mn.us> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 11:24 AM Subject: Westonka.news Page 1 of 5 Westonka.news Vol. 3, No. 11 December 20, 2002 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education in District 277. **Please see news brief#1 below regarding future publication schedule of Westonka.news. Contents >= 1. News Briefs --Westonka.news Production Schedule May Change --School District lmternet Access to be Disrupted Over Break --"School District Budgeting 101" 2. Focus Topic: Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 3. Upcoming Events 4. How Are We Doing? NEWS BRIEFS · -365- 12/20/2002 Page 2 of 5 > **Westonka.news Production Schedule May Change** > > A note from the editor: > > Starting in January, I will be working a reduced schedule, which means > certain community relations activities, including Westonka.news, will > undergo some adjustments. > > At this time, we anticipate that Westonka.news will continue to be > produced, but the production schedule is yet to be determined.. It may > convert to an every-other-week or monthly schedule, but the weekly > option is still on the table, as well. > > **Does the publication schedule matter to you? I would appreciate > hearing your opinions regarding the options above. Please drop me a line > at olsonb~westonka.kl2.mn.us by December 31. We will do our best to meet > the information needs of the Westonka.news readership within available > resources. > > Regardless of the publication schedule for the electronic newsletter, > subscribers to Westonka.news will continue to receive occasional > "breaking news" messages, such as weather-related closings and other > time-urgent news. > > > **School District Internet Access to be Disrupted Over Break** > > Between December 20 and January 6, community members will experience > occasional disruptions to the School District's e-mail and Web site (all Interact-based services). The computer servers that control Internet access will be moved over winter break to the new Educational Service Center, located at 5901 Surmyfield Road East in Minnetrista (next to Mound Westonka High School). Phone access should remain undisturbed. Thank you for your patience and understanding. **School District Budgeting 101'* Throughout December, business director Chuck Herdegen has been meeting with school district employees to share an overview of how school district budgets work. The presentations are part of an ongoing effort to make school district finances more transparent. While K-12 education finance in Minnesota iR exceedingly complex, Herdegen has boiled it down to an easy-to-understand overview. He'll share the presentation at school parent/teacher organization meetings, as well, beginning in the new year. .- 366- 12/20/2002 Page 3 of 5 Budget planning for 2004 will begin in earnest in January. FOCUS TOPIC **Employee Satisfaction Survey Results** Westonka employees are proud of their schools and would recommend them to others, are actively working to make the School District a better place for learning, and would still apply for a job in the District if they had to do it all over again. These were among the findings of a Spring 2002 employee satisfaction survey. The survey was compiled and analyzed by Dr. Jay Steele, a Crown College professor who provided his services at no charge to the District. The survey provided comparative data to a previous one done in 1999 (which was made possible by volunteer professional services then, as well). Strong progress was made in many areas. Of particular note are the following areas of improvement: credibility of information provided by the School District; provision of sufficient support and encouragement; ability to contact administrators easily; and timely communication when changes m'e about to occur. Two issues identified in 1999 remain concerns today: 1) Physical conditions in the workplace continue to need improvement. Many bond projects were completed over the summer (after the survey was administered) and will continue over the next few years, which may mediate some--but we know not all--of these concerns. 2) Concern about finances remains unchanged. Employees indicated interest in learning more about how school finance works, and having more frequent updates about the District's financial condition. They also believe the District does not spend enough time and money on training and development. Only one area showed a drop compared to 1999: fewer employees believe they are an important communication link to the community. Tentative feedback from presentations to employees indicates that this result may be tied to a younger employee base, many of whom do not live in the D/strict and therefore feel less of a community connection. Overall, the survey results showed important progress in providing an environment that supports both high quality education and employee satisfaction. -~?- 12/20/2002 Page 4 of 5 > > > UPCOMING EVENTS >-- > > --December 20, Last Day of School Before Winter Break > --December 23-January 5, Winter Break > --January 6, School Resumes > Home Athletic Events (for more sports schedules, go to www.mshsl.org/mshsl/schO01page.asp?sehool=314 --January 3, Varsity Wrestling vs. Columbia Heights, 5 p.m., MoUnd Westonka High School gym --January 4, Boys' Hockey vs. Shakopee: JV 1 p.m.; Varsity 3 p.m.; Pond Arena --January 7, Boys' Basketball vs. Wacoma. ~, 9 4.30 p.m,, Gr. I0 6 p.m.; Varsity 7:30 p.m.; Mo~d WeSt0nka High SchO01~ --January 9, Boy's Hockey Vs. North SC p.aul:. JV 5 p.m.; VarSity 7 p.m.; Pond Arena --January 10, BoyS" Basketball vs. Orono:: Gr:'9 4~30 p'.rn.; 'JV 6 p.m.; Varsity 7:30 p.m.; Mound Westonka High SchoOl gym --January 11, Varsity Wrestling, Verne Gagne Invitational, 9 a.m., Mound Westonka High School gym BONDS AND LEVIES Levies are for Learning (paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries,' utilities, and bus service) An operating levy was approved by voters in S~tember 2002. Bonds are for Buildings. (keeping buildings in good repair and providing Certain equipment~ Such as computers) A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 200'1. HOW ARE WE DOING? > > We would like to hear your feedback on any of the' toPics above, or any. > other school-related issue. · :~ '> E-mail: welisten~westonka.kl2.mn.us > District Feedback Line:. 952.491.8260~ ~ , :' · · > Mail: Barbara Olson, community RelatiOns. Coordinator~ WestOnka PUblic > Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 > -~8'- 12/20/2002 Page 5 of 5' To unsubscribe from this list, pleaSe send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonbC~westonka.kl 2.mn.us> It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 welisten~westonka.kl 2.mn.us ~ ://www.westonka.k 12 .mn.us Westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is public data. -369- 12/20/2002 The Gillespie Gazette VOL XI NO 1 January. 2003 PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE December 20, 2002 Dear Members and Friends, The year 2002 has come and gone. For many of us, it has passed much too soon. As with each year for us seniors, we have lost some loved relatives and friends. I attended a lot of f~nerals, only a few weddings. If we managed to get through the year healthy, we are indeed fortunate. Looking back on the year 2002, we as a Senior Center, are indeed fortunate. We were able to pay off all the debt on our lovely building and we were able to pay all the bills to keep our Center running smoothly. Thanks to all of you for helping make this possible. One of 'our big fundraisers, the Holiday Boutique, is now histony. Although it is too early to tell how successful this ~event was, all indications are that it was very successful. Thanks to all of..you who made this such a successful event. Many ofyou worked long hours and many days and kept a happy face throughout. As we enter the New Year of 2003, we have another exciting f~ndraiser coming up on Saturday, January 4~. We have a Prime Rib Dinner/Wine Tasting evening of fun, wtth entertainment by the Cliff Brunzell Trio (Radisson Golden Strings). There may be a few tickets left, so check at the reception desk at the Center. Thisshould be a f~nd evening to welcome in the newyear. The f~n starts at 6:00 pm In November, we voted and elected our Advisory Council for the year 2003. This Advisory Council voted these to be your officers for the coming year. Jack~ ~eist, Chair; Gene Partyka, Vice Chair; Barb Calhoun, Secretary; and Marion Poteete,.Treasurer Liaison. We thank you, our Membership, for the vote of c'onfidence. With the coming of the new year comes another rite of the new year. Membership dues are Mow due. We have not changed the dues for 2003. Dues are $10 per person or $15 per couple. These dues do not even cover the cost of mailing our monthly newsletter to you, but we feel It Is a very important for our members to know what is going on at our Center. If your newsletter shows the year "2003" in the top left of your newsletter label, your dues are paid for the year. If your newsletter does not show "2003" your dues have not been paid. If you have not paid your dues, please pay them. as soon as possible. Jack V~eist Chairperson Gillespie Center Advisory Council .-370- A hint on the budget forecast: It's even ,worse than 'it IoOka By John GUnyou Ten things you Should know about the state's bud- get crisis: 1. The real problem is $5.7 billion, not $4.56 biI- lion. The revenue forecast includes inflation, but the spending forecast does not. This means that it will actu- ally cost another $1.1 billion to continue thesame service comrmtments the state is al- ready obligated to meet. 2. Last year's 8 percent deficit has ballooned to 18 percent. This happened be- cause 'the economic out- look worsened, but' mostly because 90 percent of last year's problemwas tempo- rarily delayed with one- time fixes. $1 in cuts or new revenue last *year would have been worth $2 this year and $3 next year. 3. We're spending $8 million more a day than we're taking in. This is the consequence of draining the reserve and not balanc- ing ongoing revenue and spending last year. We have to plug the $5.7 billion gap, and close this structural imbalance... 4. If K-12 education is offthe table, the 18 percent deficit is.a 31 percent prob- lem. Since K-12 education is 42 percent of the budget, everything else WOuld have to be cut' 31 percent to 'make up the difference. If both K-12 and health care' are'protected, the neces- sary cuts would increase to 45 percent. 5. K-12 education and health care account for 85 percent, of the budget growth. Spending in these two areas must be brought under control. Spending on higher education, local gov- ernment aids, state gow emment, health and human services is not the problem. 6. The cost of. property tax reform is more than half the deficit. Tax reform and the school 'funding take- over 'permanently in- creased the state's biennial spending base by $2.5 'bil- lion, or by:nearly 10 per- cent. These new perma- nent commitments were made with surplus revenue · that is no longer available. 7. Slowing the growth in spending will not solve the deficit. After adjusting for tax reform, biennial spend- lng is going up 9 percent, not 14 percent, That's not a lot more than the projected 7 percent growth in reve- nue. Even 'freezing all spending growth and re- pealing property tax reform would not solve the deficit. '8. Ifil be extremely diffi- cult to c~tt Spending more than inflation. Real spend- ing growth, before any cuts are made, is about 4.5 per- cent a year. After adjust- ments for last year's re- forms aad shifts, real K-12 spending only goes up about 3 percent annually, and local aids about 1 per- cent annually. 8. Not all of the tobacco endowment is available. Be-. cause the state drained its reserves last year, most of these funds serve as a cash flow account so that the state does not have to bor- row to' cover its operating costs. Doing so would jeop- ardize the Aaa credit rating. .10. The forecast is prob- ably going to be Worse. As if it wasn't bad enough; the. $5.7 billion deficit is based on optimistic assumptions. It assumes economic growth better than the Blue Chip Consensus forecast and no war or terrorist acts. In other words, there's con- siderable doWnside risk. -- John Gunyou is city manager of Minnetonka. He was.. Minnesota finance commissioner under Gou. Arne Carlson during the state's last budget crisis. -371 - Minnesota Lawful Gambling LG555, :,Goverpment Approval or ACknowledgment For Use of - ' Gambling Fand (previously LGS03 and LG265) Organization infOr~afien (pleaSe pr nt) ' '(11/01 Organization ~ame ~ UcenseNumber ~~ ~ ~ · Expenditure DescriPtiOn '(attach addlliona Shoe_? lfn~~ . 2, Check lhe appropriale expenditure catego~: ~.ContribUtlOn to a un It of government - United Sta les, state of Minnesota ,agencies, ~t. lnstmmentalltles. NOTE. A contributlo~ ~ .... ~ ~.~ .~ ,,.? ~y of its subdivisions, · ,.=y not ce ma~e mrect y to a law en~ement or prosecutona~ agency, ~uch as a police de ~aHmen ~ county sheriff, or county attorney. A wildllfemanagement proDct that behests the public at large with approval of the state agency that has authori~ over the project. - Describe the proposed expenditure, including vendors. -- Grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle t~alls with approval by DNR. All trails must be open {o publl~ use. Describe the proposed eXpendllur~, including vendors. Oath ' _.. · I affirm that. the contribution or expenditure; in accordance with Minnesota Ruie 7861 ;0120, subpart 5D(10), does not · result in any net mOnetary gain or other pf..'cunia~ benefit to our organization. I affirmthat When~lav~fbl gambling funds are U~ed forgro0ming and maintaining snowmobile or all,terrain vehicle trails or for any wildlife management prole~t for which r~in~bu~Sement is received from a unit of government the reimburse- men[ funds musl be depostled In.our lawful gambling account and recor!'ed On the LG1010 - Scliedule C/D report. Chief. exe~ulive officer's signature Phone number / Date Government Approval/ACknowledgment By signature below, {he representative of the unl[ of government , approves the project as described abc'ye; arid/or ". 'acknowledges the contribution, whlcti Will not be used for a .pension or retirement fund. 'Signature Title Phone number. ~S~'~1~'7,.¥ 0(oO C) state's/'? Z!p ~'~ ~ ~_..~ Date I~,. /~/o~. Keep this completed form altached Io the LGI010 - Schedule CID in your organization's records. I This form Will be made available in alternative [ormat (Le, J large print, Braille) upon 'request; If you use a TTY, y,ou. can InformatiOn ,what':re, quested by:the',:Board ,:and Will t~e b.~'d ' J:~!.l u~ by using theMInne~.ta R~lay 8ervi(;~'~[. j 2~'b0~627. 3529 and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000. I t0 ~e~e'?~ih~ ~;~r c0n¥1iance w th Minnesota slatutes and The informalion requested on this form will become public rules governing lawful gambling activities, For additional information, check our web site at ww, gcb,state,mn.us .-372- Minnesota Lawful Gambling - Government ApproVal or Acknowledgment For Gambling FUnd (prev10uslyLGS03andLG265) Use of (11101 Organization Information (pleasep~rint) ~I~:~'--~'¢;~R'~('O...- ~::>-~, ~>(~ organizstionName [Ylo~a.u3.~._ ~CC-3 ~ . LlcenseNumber · E×p nditum D criPfion (et a h eddlIionel sheel 1. Amount c~ proposed lawful purpose expe'ndilure t $~ 2. Check Ihs appropriate expenditure categdry,. : ..... Contribution to a unit of government' - Unlted States, state of Minnesota, or any of its subdivision s, agencieal or Instrumenlallfies. NOTE: A contrlbulion may not be made directly to a law enforcement or prosecutorlal ~gency, such as s police depadment, county sheriff, or county attorney. __ A wildlife management pro)act that benefits the public at large with approval of the state agency that has authority over the project. · . Describe the proposed expenditure, including vendors. Grooming and maintaining snowmo, bile or all-terrain vehicle trails with approval by DNR. All trails must be open to public use. Describe (he proposed expenditure, including vendors, Oath I afl, tm that the contribution or expenditure, in accordance with Minnesota Rule 7861,0120, subpad 5D(10), does not result In any net monetary gain or other pecuniary benefi[ to dur organizallon. I affirm ii,at when lawful gambling [unds are used for grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain Vehicle trails or for any wildlife managemen[ p[oject for wh ch reimbursement is received [rom a unit of government, Ihs relrnbure, e- ment funds mus[ be deposited in our lawful gambling account and recorded on the LG1010 - Schedule C/D report. Chief executive offber's signature Phone number ' Date GoVernment Approval/Acknowledgment By signature below, the representative ct [he unil of government ; · approves Ihs project as described above, and/or ; · acknowledges [he contribution, wl'fici~ will noi be used for a pension or retirement fund. UnltofGovernmen,, Ct'~'~,O'~ ~Ot, j~V% & Prln[Nam~. 0 ~ ~'~ ~ ~~ TIIle Signature ~~ ~ Keep Il'tis completed form altached lo Ihs LG1010- Schedule CID In your organization's records. This form will be made available in alternaiive format (t.e. The information requested on this form will become public large print, Braille) upon request, If you'use a T'FY, you can Inrormafion, when requested by the Board, and will be used call us by using the Minnesota Relay Service al. I:800~627- to de,ermine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and 3529 and ask to place a call ~d 651-639-4000. rules governing lawful gambling activities. For additional in[ormation, cl3eck our web site at ww. gcb.state.mn.us -373- LG$55 ' GG le e - unAp. Pr°( va oL r Acknowledgment FOr Use 2. Che~ the appr~rlate ~'q~enditure category; :. ,,:.:, ,.: . .- ' agencies, or Instrun~e~tajltl~:' NOT~. ~ ,~';.,i:, ,,........ Y. ? subd~Islons, · ... ,-, ,,,,,.,,..,uuu. may no[ De ~eae olrecl]y.'[o a laW enmm~ent or proeemJtoria/agency, Such as a poJice department, county sheriff, or Oounty attorney. A'wildllfe managema~ ~roje~ that benefits the publiCM large with approval of the state agency that has authority Over the;Pr~e~: i. ' Describe the proposed expenditure, Incl'uding vendors · GroOming and. maintaining .nowinObile or all-terrain vehl~,le trails with approval by DNR. Ali' trails must be open. to public usa. ' Deeorlbe the proposed expendtture~ Including vendors. · ': Oath · I affirm that the contribution or expenditure, in a~cordanoe with Minnesota Rule 7881.0120, subpart 5D(10), does not result in any net monetary gain or other pecuniary benefit to our organization. · I affirm that when lawful gambling funds are used for grooming and maintaining snowmobl!e or al~.te~n vehicle trails O~r.fO~any..W!~l]f~ ~ahag~ ! hl~ reimbursement Is received` from a' un-it ~f go~ernme:~, the rei~bur~e- :'~~ ,gambling aoceunt and recorded on Government APprOval/Acknowledgment ay. signature below, the representative of the unit' ~fgo~mrnent ., '" · approves' the Project as described above, and/or · acknowledges the contribution, which will not be used for a pension or retirement · , .~__ Phone number , Acldm~ ...... I Pr~ Nmlle __ ., ' . ..: .! . . . .. , . . : ..... _ ' . p tiffs ¢omj:ileted form attached to the gGl~10, Schedule C~' in Y~r 0rg'a~ii'~:i~% r~r~S. call us by using the~iAi~ ....... , .~ _ Y orrn~%. ~en requeat~ by ~ B~, ~ be used · , Relay Se~e at 1-800-627. to e~mi . . ' 3629 and ask.to I - . de~ ne..your ex3mpllanDe w~.Mmnasota's~ute~ ............ .-374- ' City of Mound Delinquent Billing Certification to County Last Five Years Year 2O02 'Amount 88,907.31 2001 61,669.62 2OO0 1999 199'8 Gino 12/26/2002 67,092.15 71,851.30 86,250.94 -375- TI-W No~ember 2002 Technical -. -Assistance Times Rural/Municipal'Water and Wastewater publication of th.e Minnesota'Rural Water Association Elbow Lake, MN 56531 Teleph'one: 800-367-6792 Fax:. 218-685-5272 web.: Www. mrwa.com E-mall: mrwa®mr~va.com ·., Member'of the National Rural Water Ass.o'eiation Seeking Payment for Delinquent Water Bills Minnesota cities use one' or both'of two methods to.get' paid for Wate~'services when the .normal billing process fails. This a'3ticle Provides an overview of shutting off 'water services or certifying unpaid water bills.i6 the county auditor fo~'paymentwith property taxes. This article does not address municip~I gas and electric utilities. Any city. may provide comprehensive water services and s.ysten~s,' including sewer, and storm sewer services, -for citizens. Coineidently, a city may us e reasonable rules to enforce payment for water services from the 'owner, lessee, occupant of'the property or all of them. Water services,, as stated in this article, refers to water, Sewer, and storm water servic'es. What process is reqfiire~l'to enforce pa. yment? Citie~ mugt establish reasonable procedures and appropriate timelines to pro¥ide Water consumers written notice o'f their right to contest unpaid bills, water shut-off,· or c.ertification of unpaid bills to the county auditor. The notice ·must clearly identify the person or persons the city authorizes to listen tO consumers .and make appropriate decisions based on the facts. A discussion of Unpaid bills, or hearing, is an informal proceeding and cities:can enter into ins'tallmeni agreements With consumers to. address delinquent bills. .. 'Ii'the consumer does not ~espond to reasonable notice or no res61ution is reached, the city may proceed with shutting off water hr' ce~:tifica'tion tO the~ county a.udito3 to l~rocure' payment. 'First, Cities should use reasonable methods to ensure the responsible person .receives written notice of the. pending acti0nl Some cities send n'6tice, by certified maiI to the person's last known address, other, cities d~liver a red tag to the front door of the .~,r~ePxcPerty'as a warning of wat~'r shut Off or certi?icatioff: ~ , ' ' ' . ' When isa city barred from-shutting off'water? The cold weather rul:e is an imPortant eption'to keep in mind before shutting off water service. No dtility shall discbnnect service to a'resident uni~ during'cold weather months, between O~tober 1'5 and Apr//15, ii' that shut-off would in any way 'affect the primary heat source of the unit and the.consumer complies wlth the i~ '%.,~.. ,,.~ '[ ~,,~.:.__~ prows~ons.of the rule. This rule applies to shditing off ' Water if the primary heat source is relat&d'in any way to the'water supply. ,. 'OnTap! "'Can cities shut o.ff tenants' or landlords' water?' · The law allows cities to enforce.charges' against a lessee O~r Commi~ent ~'~ Our ]~r0f~ion · -37S- : Seeking .Payment for Delinquent Water Bills or occupant, but also requires c/ties provide tenants notice and a-,hearing as ;discussed previously. Since it is often difficult to engage in this lengthy process with individuals who live in an area .for a short time, most cities pass an ordinance making property owners 'financially' responsible for water services. As to landlords, a tenant's witer supply must not be terminated due to a landlord's outstanding water debt without notifying the tenant and providing a chance to discuss the situation. How is shutting offwater affected by property sales? If the owner of a particular property sells the property and has delinquent water bills, cities cannot require the buye~ to pay those delinquent bills before providing water services. 'Nor can. cities shut off water services to a new owner based 0nly on the outstandlng water bills of the seller. What about bankruptcy proceedings and water shut- offs? Initially, water may not be shut. off when a property owner with delinquent bills, files a petition for bankruptcy. Twenty days from .the date of the filing, however, a city can terminate water to the property unless the own ~r or bankruptcy trustee provides a deposit or some assurance of payment for cohtinuing water service. A state law makes' governmental (Continued from page one) services a prior lien :in bankr'uptcy proceedings by operation ofl~w.' Is certification for collection with taxes a better option than shutting off water? There are rnan~ exceptions to consider before shutting offwater to a particular pioperty. To avoid this, .cities can certify unpaid water' bills to their' county auditor once a'year. The outstanding al'cbt then becomes a lien; or charge, against the property, collected with property taxes. Even if the property is sold after certification, the buyer must pay the debt. Also, a prior lien against the property secures the debt if the owner later dechires bankruptcy. Additionally, certification prevents .large delinquent bills carrying over from year to year and, once delinquent bills are certified, staff time spent trying to collect payment is eliminated. Cities should ask their county auditor when unpaid water bills must be certified; the statute implies a deadline' of December 28 in conjunction with property taxes, but some counties require certification of unpaid water bills by November 29 with special assessments. Remember, notice and a hearing must be provided prior to certification. For examples of notice and hearing procedures, please call the League Research Service at 651-281-1200 or 800-925- 1122. Reprinted with permission from Jeanette Behr, League of Minnesota Cities. deanette Behr is research attorney with the League of Minneso.ta Cities. Keep Your COOL at Work! Onthejob,it'solwaysbesttokeepnegative right,' and it doesn't mean, "I agree to do it your way." ~t simply acknowledges that you'ge listened to the other thoughts to yourself. Tf you distrust a.co- worker or just can't stand to talk too particular customer one more time., it is never a goad idea to soy so. What con you do then, if you get a little hot under the collar at work? Try these suggestions: Tread softly. Becoming hestile won't get you anywhere, so react gracefully. If you feel you must confront someone,.be polite and .controlled. Be open to compromise and don't speak ,n an acc. usatory tone. Keep Smiling. Sometimes the best thing to do' is forc.e.yourself to put on o smile and.will yourself to believe things will improve. Positive thoughts can turn into positive actions and positive results. Give Yourself a Time-out. Don't 'react immediately if something happens that really upsets you..Take a deep breath, collect your thoughts, lend cool off. Say, "lbO:at Taken." This is a great phrase to master. :]:t doesn't mean, "You're point of view. Vent Outside of Work: Complain to a friend you can trust. Askyour spouse or a family member renan objectiveossessment of thesitu~tion. Write your feelings down. Get the'situation out in the open and off your mind Talking or writing through a problem may help you see a clear, solution. -the Quill Pen Pal Newsletter - 3une 2.000 Upcoming Training Session s... December' 4, 2002 - Grand Rapids Winterizing Your Water System December 5, 2002 - St. Cloud Winterizing Your 'Water System December 11, 2002 - Elbow Lake Wastewater Training Fee Required TO REGISTER: Please call 800-367=6792 or on-line at wWw.mrwa.com (Use training button) Mediaco Bill Jensen Director of Operations December 17, 2002 Kandis Hanson, Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1627 Dear Mr. Hanson, Mediacom will institute a rate adjustment on Family Cable service in your community effective February 1, 2003. A copy of the full schedule of rates and charges as well as the channel 'line-up is attached and will be enclosed in customer billing invoices beginning December 17, 2002. The rate adjustment reflects the increased costs of providing service. Two significant factors in the increases are programming fees and investments to upgrade our broadband networks to offer more products and advanced services such as high speed Internet. The fees we pay to programming companies have increased dramatically over the course of the past year. Mediacom has also invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin and South Dakota over the past two years in broadband network improvements. Mediacom is concerned with the level of programming cost increases requested by programming companies and their impact on customer rates and choices. Additional data detailing the escalation of programming costs and other related information will be provided in January. Please contact me directly at (507) 835-2356 if you would like to discuss the rate adjustments or ifI may be of any assistance in responding to customer inquires. Sincerely, Bill ~ Director of Operations Mediacom Communications Corporation 1504 2ad Street, S.E. · Waseca, MN 56093 · 507-835-2356 · Fax 507-835-4567 .-378- Products & Services PriCe Eist '.Serving Lake Minnetonka Area Effective 2-1-03 MONTHLY EQUIPMENT RENTAL Dear Valued Cu~mer, HedJacom is always a: your se~ce--~r0rn the best quality programming to in addic~0n, .we c0n:inually seek ways to keep expenses down so our products and Servi~e$~Wlll bea:~ the best price possible, However. increased operational costs and cable pr0grammi~g expenses have continued to escalate. A: this time, we find it necessary to make some modest adjustments to monthly rates beginning with your February, 2003 billing statemenL Even wi'd~ this adjustment, Mediacom continues [o be an extraordinary value for access to.entertainment and information, The improvements we have made throngl~&i~t the year and continue to make every day allow us to better our service and ensure the~. Mediacom can continue to serve you with the finest products. Thank you for being a valued customer. Sincerely, Die.or o~ O~era~ons INSTALLATION CHARGES Unwired Home Ins;allation .............................. $ 4139 Wired Home Installation* ............................... $ 27.50 Reconnect ........................................... $ 27.S0 Additional Outlet Same Trip (per outte[} .................... $ 13.49 Additional Outlet Separate Trip (per outlet) ................. $ 19.99 Transfer ............................................. $ 14.50 Hourly Service Charge ,., .............................. $ 29.00 Unreturned Digital Remote ...' ........................... $ 25.00 Unreturned Digital Converter/Modem ..................... $ 300.00 Upgrade of Digital Cable on ~xisting Outlet ................. $ 13.49 Upgrade of Digital Cable RequiringAdditional Ins:all ........... $ 33.48 ConnectVCR at Time of Initial Install ...................... $ 5.99 ConneccVCR Requiring SeparateVisit ...................... $ 12.99 *Relocating. of existing wiring and wall fishes are:not included. For transfers apply the wired/unwired fees~ CABLE SERVICES Broadcast Basic ....................................... $ 1350 Family Cable* ........................................ S 43.95 Cable Guide ......................................... $ 3.00 HomeWIre Maintenance Plan .... .~ ............ ........... $ 1.40 Pay-Per-View (PPV) Movies** ............................ $ 3.99 *~ncludes Broadcast Basic. **Adult end Special Event Prices rna), vary. DIGITAL A LA CARTE PREMIUM SERVICES (Digital Converter Required) HBO ............................................... $ 11.95 Cinemax ............................................ $ 9.95 Showtime ............... ~. ....... ~ · ................ $ 9.95 STAP, Z! ...................... .... ~ ................. $ 9.95 Digital Converter with Remote ........................... Digital Unk.(Di~ttal Convener Required) ................ ...$ 3.00 (Includes Interactive Guide. PPV Access. and Digital lusic Choice) MEDIACOM ONLINE ' (Cable Modem Required) · Hediacom OnJin& Service w/Modem Rental ................. $ (Includes $10 Sa~ings when subscribing to both Online endVideo Services.) Mediacom Onlini~ Service w/Modem Rental ................. $ S$.95 Plediacom Online Service - Modem supplied by customer ; ..... $ 40.95 (Includes $10 savi~s when subscribing to both Online andVtdeo Services.) hlediac6m:O~line Service - Modem supplied by customer ...... $ 50.95 Addkion~l Dynamic IP Address ........................... $ 5.00 II~ediacorn Online Installation Fees Limited Installation .................................... $ 49.95 (Ctbie line to cable modem only) Premium Installation: Complete Installation with Ethernet card (NIC) ............. $ 124.95 COmplete Installation without Ethernet card (NIC) .......... $ 99.95 DIGITAL PACKAG ES1* (Family Cable and Digital Converter Require,d) Includes Di~lital Link (interactive Guide. Digital Music Choice, Digital Pay-Per-View Access) and Special Interest Channe s Digital Access ........................................ $ 7.00 Digital Encore - formerly Digital Family ..................... $ 12.00 (Includes 12 Encore Premium Channels} Digital Choice~ ....................................... $ 15.00 (Includes your choice of one Flulfi-Screen Premium Group) Digitel Valude ......................................... $ 23.00 (Includes your choice cd: two IVlulti-Screen Premium Groups) DigitaIValue Plus* ..................................... $ 30.00 (includes your choice of three Flulti-Screen Premium Groups) Total Digital .......................................... $ 38.00 (includes all four of fl~e Fluid-Screen Premium Groups) _Digital en Espal~o ..................................... $ 5.95 (Add to any [~[gital Package Includes 9V c~eo and 7 IVlusic Channels) *Digital Packages with HBO ere $2.00 extra. tPrice of Famil'/Cable and Digital Conver~er not included. How to Contact Us Call center 24 hours a day/7 days a week:. 1-800-332-0245 A $20.00 field collections charge will be applied to all accounts with unpaid balances , · sent to the field for collection. saa200$8 8383-92~ ( 1490, I S00- ! 680.3020) 5:34 PM Page 29 DIGITAL~ SPECIALqNI'ER_E~r B 201 Discover7 Kids B 292 The khmce' Channel N 20H Discoyery Ilealth DS Gq Show'.#~rk B 207 'The G~lf cham~i B 208 BBC Ame~c~ B 210 I~lep~dde~t film Channel B 212 History Channel Internatinna~ B 213 Lifetime flovie Network N 2t4 TRIO B 215 Huch Hasle B 223 The .Health, Network B 224 Goodlife B 2H0 O~tdoor: Channel 22~ B I.saa20059 11/15/02 2 KTCA (~ k Pul 4 wcco (CBS) 5 I(gl' (ABC) St_ ? XSTC (IND) 8 Lo~ Access 9 ~P (F(~) HpIs. lO Hedmrm Connec~on U KAJ~ (NBC) H~. 13 k'Tcl (PBS) St_ P~ 14 C-Span 2 15 WGN 16 C-Span 17 eW~ (Yin) 18 QYC 19 EdeC~innal 1Y/Lo~ Access 20 Local Access 21 Loc~ Access 22 KPXH (PAX) Hpls. 23 1%e Weather Channel 24 ESPN 25 ESPN 2 26 FOX %onto Net 27 FX 28 Speed Channel 29 Ufetime Ho ~ 31 USA 32' $~-fi' 33 TBS 34 TIlT 35 36 American Mode Classics 37 ME 38 History Channel 39 HGN 40 [~1 Network 41 Court 1~ 42 Trael+ Channel 43 DisCovery Clrannel 44 The laamin~ Channel 45 k,iml Pbmt 46 Nickelodeon 47 C~oon Network 48 Disney 49 1Y land 5o So~ ,et - 51 E! 52 Comedy bm,al ' 53 I~ 54 Ylll 55 CffT 56 TNN 57 TBN 58 flalinmk 5~ EWTN 60 C~N 61 Headline News 42 FOX News Channel 63 HSNBC 65 FOX Mode Channel 4d BET 67 Inspi~tinnal Network 68 HSN I) IY Guide Channel 70 Un~Yision I WE:Women% :Entertainment 78 Turner Classic MoYies = BrbadCaSt Basic DIGITAL MULTI'SCREEN PREMIUM GROUPS HBO GROUP 301 HBO' 303 HBO 2 305 HBO ~am~ 307 HBO $ignatore 309 flBO rultino 311 HBOComedy .. 313 HBO Zone · ...... ciNEMAX GRoUp 325 Cinemax 327 MoreMAX 32~ ActionflAX 331., ThrjlI~'HAX 333 WHAX 337 55m.'ftAX 339 Oute~qAX SHOWTIMFJTMC GROUP 35l Sh~ 352 Sho~me West 353 Shov~ime Too 354 Showdme Too West 355 Show,me $iewcase 356 ~h~ Sh~e W~t 358 ~e Ex~ W~ 359 ~i~ ~ 380~ mC 38'r mC.We 382:,~C X~ 383 ~C X~ Wut 3fl ~n~u W~ 392 FUX 393 FUX West STARZUENCOREGROUP 401 g'Al~ 402 STAI~ West 403 STA~ 2 405 Black STAI~ 407 WA~ 409 STARZ? 4 Fam~y 411 STAR~ 5 Onema 412 STA~ 5 Onenm West 420 Encore 421 Encore Wm 422 Action 423 Action West 424 Loye Stories 425 ~e -sm~ West 426 Mystery 427 H~ery West 428 True Stories 429 Tree Stories West 430 Westen~ 431 Westerns West "DIGITAL PAY, pER.VIEW IOl.12d Me~co~ r~ ~ nS.j~;~ Adu~ P~V 150 EHPN Now IS1-155 Sports PPY ·DIGITAL EN ESPA~IOL 250 Telemondo International 252 the 253 HTYff 254 FOX ~m World en E~ 255 CNN 256 T~ D~ en Esp~ 257 fin S 258 YH Uno, 2~ O~ b6n ~nte~po~ 260 D~. ~a T~ 261 O~ ~ ~ Esp~ 262 D~ ~tin 263 DHX 264 D~ 26 ~ DIGITAL MUSIC 501 Showcase 502 Todr{s .Cobntry 503 Cl~!~ !:ountry so4 Am~ 505 Bluegrass 506 MB NiP Hop 507 oessie 508 Smooth so~ ~p. 511 Rock 512 Power Rock 513 Oassic bck SI4 ~J~enm6ve 51S Electronia 516 D~nce 517 Pro~ressiye/Adult ~ltem~ive 518 SO~t ~ck 519 Hit.~t 520 :~. Faodtes 52! ~rs :. 522 Ne~ Wac 523 524 Solid Gold Oldies 525 Singes and $to~lmrds 526 BE'Band & Swing 527 Em7 Listening 528- Smooth Jazz 52} Jazz 530 Blues 531 Reggae 532 Soundscapes 533 Classical Hastespieces 534 Opera 535 U~ 536 Show.Tunes 537 Cmtomporary Ch~tL~n 538 Gospel 539 For Kids Only 540' Sounds of the Seasons 541 Hos~ ladna 542 Salsa y Ilarengue 543 Rock en Espafiol S44 latin Love Sonss 545 flexicana ,-380- Jan-06-03 04:55P Brenshel] Homes 9524958121 P.02 Mound Harbor Renaissance 4052Oaklancl St SL Boaifaci~,MN55375. Phone(952)446-1284 * Fax (952) 446-156~ Thomas Stokes cellular (612) 221-t 141 January 7, 2003 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound=, MN 55364 Attn: Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Subj: Downtown Mound Redevelopment Status Report The purpose of this letter is twofold. First to advise the Mound HRA of the progress completed on the project by the Developer, Mound Harbor Renaissance LLC (MHR), since our meeting on November 26, 2002, and seCOnd to request specific HRA actions be initiated and completed so that modeling and planning for the project can continue. Our focus has been directed in two areas; completion of the project economic model and planning for ali four districts in the project including the associated City/County/Met Counci[ projects that must be completed in the project areas. First I would like to update you on the progress we have made in preparing our economic model. MHR has retained the firm of Krass MonrOe, specifically Jim Cassedy (Public Finance Lawyer) and Greg Johnson (CPA), to complete the TIF model and supporting data for submission and review by Ehlers & Associates, · Inc. In order to complete this model,.detailed cost estimates have been completed for the development of the project district by district, including: demolition and cleanup, an oveday has been completed referencing the final project layout to existing tax parcels, sales and lease/rent market values and revenue projections have been completed, and a first draft of the project schedule has been prOvided so that the TIF model can be completed: The TIF calculation should be completed in about two weeks. We are now completing our estimates for land acquisition, which wilt allow the economic model to be completed by the end of January 2003, As part of this land acquisition analysis, we have assumed that all City owned parcels in the districts would be deeded to MHR at no cost to the project. The City of Mound HRA is requested to confirm this assump.t, ion bY January 24.'2. 00~. ' ..... Our second major area of effort has been the detailed review of Critical Path items necessary to enable a Project Plan/Schedule to be completed, As reported. on November 26, 2002, the re-alignment of County 15 was identified early on as Homes 952495B~21 P .03 Mound:Harbor Renaissance ~m~ ~0~ ~ular (~12) ~1-1141 a critical path item and Mayor Meisei organized a meeting with all parties and State/County elected representatives on November 25, 2002 to review this issue. The results of that meeting are noted in the enclosure. Prior.to addressing.the impact of this meeting, MHR would like to review other planning actions completed. MHR and the City Pro act Team met on November 27, 2003 to review in detail the status of all Cit~ PC ' · ) .~:..n. ty~e.,t..C~¥nc41 projects associated with or affecting the downtown r'bd'~e{o mont. Wh.e tti~s list is lengthy and complex, all projects for which the Ci~ has ~$irect ~tm./appear to.be, on schedule, f~ncled and in line with redevejS~h.{-.r~'~: biremenp'.foreach district. There are however two critical p~jects that the City d(:~s not have direct.~trol overand for wfi'ib.h completi0n 'S~eduieZ ~nd'finai de.,,.jgn are incomplete; these are the relocation of the:"l~'~t~ti?¥(Mef~:coUncii~" andlth, ~.' ~!ignmen!; of County 1,5 (Hennepin County Transportati6~i'):; '.~:~th' reS~ to,t~ lift,~tation, MHR?requeststhat the City HRA initiate di~ssioh~ with tl~e Me{'"C~ ir~cil ~'.determine l.ift.sta{ion location,,design, ' schedulea'~ni~l~{i°n :dat~'~ and"~e ~ice~'~Unding availabilities teadir~c~,to a firm After reading and re-reading the County response to the meeting of November 25, 2002, MHR that II .be two requirements that need to be'~ of freight rail service to 2003., First the road design mUst be . , co~pa~ibii ~il.a0d .mad improvement operating must porary interruption add s at thei~ expense. This 'could fre'igYit ~e CoUn~ references the requirement for .... letter.:... Or~e, COald:conclude that a~d tf~. corridor:~.is 'preserved for is maintained then i C~Uoty .! 5,r~[ig~ent.;is an at-grade :moSsingi statement .becaMseit is our,.-undemtanding- 1 noti'aVailable reqUests that the City HRA advise wheth assumption Is correct so that the County tS.~e-align~e.nt,de~[gr],,,,c%t, and'sCedule,canbe;~nalized:and a ,.' City/Cbunty agreement ~r~' ~e.ex~cuted~' Ii~ iS;imPortant, that we ,have'~this -382- Jan-06-03 04:56P Brmn~hell Hom~s 9S24958121 · MoUnd Harbor Renaissance ~o~2 o.~t,~ ~t. St. Boaifa~iu% MN 55~75 Ph0ae(952) ~[(~1294 , F~ (952) Thomas ~ok~ ~ular (~12) ~I-1141 determinatioq by Feb~ary 21, 2003. MHR cannot complete the project plan with the undetermined status of the lift station and County 15 re-alignment Finally, the current agreement between the City and MHR needs to be amended to provide a reasonable time period far development to proceed consistent with the above referenced time constraints. Because the re-development of downtown Mound is a very complex project and requires the close COordination of the Developer and the City HRA, MHR recommends that a joint work session between the City HRA, City Staff, and the MHR Development Team be held as soon as possible to discuss and resolve the major issues noted above and re. COnfirm the progress on other associated City projects, The MHR ~team remains excited about the project and believes that once these upfront roadblocks are reSOlved that the project viability will be proven and detailed de~lopment plans can be completed. Tom StOkes President, Mound Harbor Renaissance, LLC End: Hennepin County Administration letter dated December 23, 2002 Hennepin County Administration Sandra L. Vargas, County Administrator A-2303 Govern~nent Center 300 South siXt[Stf~e{ ~' ~ :: ':: Minneapolisi-MN $5487-0233 6~ 2-348-7574 'FAX: 612-348-8228 TDD:ffl 2,348,7367 www. co.hennepin.mn.us December 23, 2002 The Honorable Mayor Pat Meisel Mayor of MOund 5341 Maywood. Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Meisel: This communication is in response to the discussions that took 'place at the NoVember 25, 2002 meeting regarding an accelerated schedule for the CSAH 15 road improvement proj.eet. As summarized at the meeting, the Hennepin Co~tY Regi6nal R~lroad A ' ' .... · : ' 4 ,~ .... :! ' "' ' ' uthonty s (HCRRA:) first leg~ priority ~'s restoratmn of fr?ght rail se~ce.. Thi.s is a matter of federal law and of HCRRA's good faith commi~e~t to the'f~eral SurfaCe Transportation Board (STB) to restore freight rail operations if economically feasible. With that in mind, staffofthe HCRRA have explored a number of approaches and .sought counsel from persons more experienced in STB issues, in an attempt, to identi~ workable alternatives. Specifically, alternatives which could ~acilitate rede.~elopment plans.in both Mound and Minnetrista, without placing the ability fo provide freight rail service and continued ownership of the corridor.in peril,. ~ ~. %.: The approach suggested by Mr. Vogel would be a creative solution in some instances, but does not address the specific circumstances for this corridor in light of HCRRA's legal obligation to restore freight rail service. Nonetheless, allowing the corridor to be. temporarily severed by road redevelopment may still be possible. There are two minimum requirements that must be met. First, we need to make absolutely certain that the project design provides for a tinal raikoad grade that is acceptable for any rail use, i.e/ freight, commuter or light rail. Second, we need to have the grade alteration and track.. reconstruction completed in a timeframe that does not interfere with resumption of rail service. To address the fn'st issue, both Hennepin County Transportation and Chuck Alcon, the Mirmetrista developer, have been instructed that they must, at their expense, contract with TKDA, Inc., a raikoad consultant engineering ftrm, for a raikoad engineering analysis of their respective projects. The analysis will document 1) the grade level of the rail corridor that must be attained to 'permit freight rail and the road imProvements to :operate compatibly; 2) the anticipated costs and time' Period needed for making necessary grade level changes; and 3) the availability or lack of adequate property on either'side of the An Equal Opportunity Employer '--3 8-4 - Recycled Paper Page 2 proposed at-grade crossing to permit a new grading that is acceptable for rail use. It is expeetedthat, this analysis could be completed by' approximately April 2003. Simultaneous with this work, the HCRK~'will be preparing ang distributing a Request For Proposals to solicit potential operators on the line. The RFP responses witl indicate ............................... whether or not there are acceptable operators willing to take on the economic burdens necessary to restore freight rail operations. Following receipt of the engineering report and RFP responses, we Will have a better understanding 0fthe Options available in this matter. Pl-ease be aware, however, that any temporary severing of'the line, prior to abandoment au,:thority from the federal STB, will require not only a'satisfactoD' grade change for the two proj cots, but also a complete. reconstruction Of'the track and associated materials (ties, ballast, etc.). We i~ecogrdze ~d understand your interest in expediting the CSAH 15 project in Mound, but our options for accommodating your request must addreSS the obligations placed on the HCRRA by the STB and must not ignore the fact that the Dakota/Rail continues to;be classified as an active rail 1/ne. If you have questions or require clarification regarding the above information, please contact Marcia Wilda at 612-348-8537. ely, . .~ Assistant County Administrator, Public Works and County Engineer C: Commissioner Penny Steele Charles Alcon, Wara Real Estate, Inc. -385- The Brlme~er TBG CONSOLTIN~ ' Fifty South Ninth Avenue Suite 1'01 Hopkins, MN 55343 .................... fax: (952) 945-0102 e-mail:brimgroul~aoLcom web:' www. brimgroup.com Winter Issue January 2003 VoL !1, Issue 1 · Elected ? ... NOw What ? by James Brimeyer You have just been elected to Serve on a City Coundl or County Board. Your sup- porters believed in you and backed you alLthe way. You. are. elated, to have been selected by your.&ttow-ci-tizens to..repre~ sent them in local government. But the euphoria can soon wear off as you re~B_ze you have gone from. "interested citizen!' to someone who is suddenly expected to be knowledgeable about a variety of complex issues and situations. It's time tO get to. know the job. There is no textbook or crash.course to learning this new job of public se~ce -- which can seem overWhelming at times. I would like to offer some pointers from my years of experience on both sides of the board table. Required. Information It is important to understand the legal framework under which you will operate. · The State Statutes or Charter will desig- nate the form of government for your city or county. ' 'Investigate the government structure, i.e., the role of the Mayor or Board Chair; CEO as Manager, AdminiStrator, or Cleric Also learn the reporting rela- tionships of staff within the organization. · Become familiar with the current budget and/or the proposed budget. Strive to gain. a working understanding of the underlying issues. Government finance can be very confusing. Try to obtain the information in a balance sheet, format and learn how the monthly statements are presented. · Gain an understanding of the format and procedures for the Council or Board meetings. Learn the regulations of the Open Meeting Law. Useful InformatiOn Getting historical information and back, ground data can daxi~y policy issues. ·. Meet with' fellow elected colleagues - both veterans and mookies. Get to know tlx-~-~-~d-th~-a~ge~w-~-~ W--h-y--d0' ~hey serve onthe Count/Board. role and the role of the Board/Council and staff. · Ask-to meet with each Department Head for purposes of understanding their respective operations and the needs of their departments. · Stay in touch with your colleagues, the CEO., the staff (through the CEO), and your constituents. Advertise your e-mail address, your. Phone contacts, or any other commu- nication method that would encourage people tO contact you. Developing Your Style A guide for good decision making. · Develop a process to help you assess the merits of a prOposed policy. Know how to measure results: and outcomes to determine the desired impact of the poli¢.. · Take a visionary approach. Be goal oriented) take Some risks and put no ~ts on your ideas. · Stay attuned to trends and social changes and the .changing expectations of your constituents. Become a member of the World Future SOciety..Subscribe to Futurist and Governing magazines. · There are a number of bookS on lead- ership, organizations and management. There are three I suggest: Boards That Make a DifferenCe by John Carver, Who Moved 2Viy Cheese by Spencer Johnson, and Good to Great by Jim Collins. And finally... Always ask yourself-- "In 5-10 years, what will my successors say about the job I did while I was in 6ffice?' -386- The Brlmeyer Group, Inc. EXECUTIVE ~EARCE Fifty South Ninth Avenue Suite 101 Hopkins, MN 55343 (952) 945-0246 Route: __ Colleagues . File in noteb~itk~ Elected ? · Now What Ms. Kandis Hanson, M~nager City of Mound 534t .Maywood Ro~ Mound, MN 55364 Thee Brirneye:r Group .~.?"~'I.. · . .: ' Ass.!gnments Counties, County Engineer · City of Austin, lvIN-- City Administrator City of Dundas, City Administrator City of S. St. Paul, City Administrator · Steele County, IVIN-- Assistant Financial Director, Detention Center · City of Mound, MN-- Chief of Police · ALF- Ambulance Services--- AmbulanCe Ad~Strator Representative Searches: · City of Sleepy Eye, lVlN-- Community DeVlelopment Director · C~ of Fergus FallS, MN_ Project 2000 Director · Rice Coua~, MN-- County Administrator · City of Moorhead, MN, City Manager · City of Northfield, MN-- City Administrator · City of Albert Lea, MN-- Homing Authority Directm · Rice Creek Watershed District- DweiStrict Administrator st Metro Fire · Fire Chief o City of Brookings, City Manager T end Tracking - Weak Signal The column for newly elected officials can also be useful for veteran officials. Awareness of trends and changes is a critical element in decision making. How to process potential changes is important. A recent article in the Futurist magazine discusses Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS). There are five characteristics of this system. 1. Small changes may be indicators of larger things to come; 2. The necessity to be adaptive and employ non-linear thinking, 3. Changes are influenced by -"determin- istic processes" - not random events - and are often governed by a simple set of rules that. imply a need fororder~ 4. Systems canbe incredibly complex which creates a broad variety of possibilities. 5. While.short term predictability is possible, we must employ a discipline to examine long term implications. Forecasters and individuals in policy making roles must deliberately look for small events that have the potential to make big differences. Weak signals are usually dismissed as inconsequential or obscured by other irrelevant factors. There are a myriad of illustrations to demonstrate the relevance Of this model, e.g., the use of personal computers did not come from an existing market. ,-387- Assistance from TBG '.The roller'Lng are; ifnpb', ~tant tools'in The Brkneyer GrOup's consulting Work with dries, counties, s. chool, boards, and non-profits. Governance Model This model provides a: process, even a dis- cipline~ of decision making to help the .Board define issues and focus on desirable results. It helps the CEO .and staff by providing a method to identify the issues, consider the options and develop recom- mendations that meet the organization's mission. It also assists the Board in generating a power~l mission statement tha~: includes results terminology, Su¢cinct language, and .~that4s recognized and acCepte_d b~oth in the community and within the organization. - ~ Goal S~tting/strategic Plan.ning Assists BOards and Councils responsible for policy development in assessing their constituencies' needs, examining organiza- tional strengths and weaknesses, establish- ing priorities and developing strategies and action plans to meet the' expectations of their stakeholders. Team Building Involves employees, supervisors and man- agers in a process that fosters a sense of trust, cooperation, and loyalty to each other and to the organization's goals and objectives. It is designed to examine indi- vidual behavior and motivation to action. dan-u~-ua lU:lSam From-Kennedy & Graven · ~: · . ~ ,. 470 PillSbury C=nt:r 200 Soufl't Sbct. h Street CHARTERED T-388 P .OOUO02 Janum-y 2, 2003 To: Kmdis M. H~on From:. John Dean · Subjec:: Councflrnembcr Fundra/s~ng Activities. At its December 31, 2002 meeting, the City Council requested that I review the provisions of Mirme~ota StatUtes, chapter'309 to det~maine whether there was any potential basis for concern tlmt the fundrais~ng activities of one of the councilmembers migh'~ have viola-ecl a provision of that statute. My comments ~ only intended to address that limited inquiry. The Office of the Minnesota Attorney General is Charged with the, enforcement of Chapter 309, and with the invesdg~on of any alleged violations of it. Chapter 309 requires that, ~'ubject to certain exceptions, any charitable organization register with ~he state prior to soliciZii~g contributions. Organizations (which include individuals engaged in soliciting funds) are exempt from the registration requiremem if they receive total contributions of $2:5,000, or les~, dinting my accounting yeaz, Based on the information provided me 5y the F/nance Director, :here'is no evidence that more than $1,831 in total contributions was received by thc councilmember in 2002. Under these circumstances, the exception would apply, I can sec no lik¢lLhoOdtha:the Attorney General would find a violation· baSed on ~e failure to pro.fie a. regulation statement. 3BD-2~S$Ovi MU220-1 -388- Dec~mb~ I 1,200~ CITYof ORONO 1~. M. ichelle E, MOr~e City of Lo~ 1964 P~rk Avem~ Lon~ Lakc, MN Kc: Omno ~L,-e Service Ar:~ Ke~mt D~r lvflal:mUe: *I~lepl:u~ (gS2) ~ . Fax (95~) 24}4~1~ w~¢h ~ sigmi,fi;amly ben,fit t~¢ Long Lak~ The Le~g Lake Fi~ Depar~eat, with tim ss.~ta~ oftke Excal~or F~ D.~ a~e~ for ~ ~ ~c~ ~a ~io~ ~l~g ~ ~no ~ to r~b~ Lo~ ~ Oa a m~y b~ for 100~ of~ ~or ~e ~ s~ ~ ~on ~ 200~ ~ ~ 2004, p~ p~ae I00~ ~ of~ ~e ~ ~ p~ of$1.O0 p~ ~ (~m $9.00 per goo~ ~ ~ Long L~; ~ M~ ~ ~~ ~ p~, ~ pay, ~ P~Mn ~m ~ 200~ f~ ~o~ ~ ~ 200~ o~g Ail s~rvtce wflI ~ lrrovid~ Contr~t for Fire look f~rwa~ P~nald $, Omno City ' .-390- · Leadership: Awakening the Best in People By Carl Neu ffective leaders and stewards, especially at the local level, must learn, exhibit, and master at least the following seven attributes: 1. Leaders engage people and their energies rather than give them ready answers and "quick-fix" solutions. Leadership is about touching someone's imagination and conscience. It can start with no more than a simple question or an invitation to become involved in something. It is a process of"reaching out and touching" someone in a way that incorporates that person into a community of people. 2. Leaders inspire themselves and others to their very best efforts. Leaders inspire a worthwhile vision, goals, and commitment to make a desired future happen. Stewards ensure the capacity to keep the process vital, that required resources are made available, that responsible leadership and management succession occurs, and that the institu- tion will survive and prosper. But, first, people must be h~spired to see within themselves their inherent potential for "best." Leaders expand the conscious- ness and capacity of those whose lives they touch toward becoming the best they can be. 3. Leaders focus on the future and get agreement on common vision, goals, priorities and direction. Leaders, in the words of Thomas Cronin, "make things happen that might not otherwise hap- pen and prevent things fi:om happening that ordinarily might happen. [Leader- ship] is a process of getting people working together to achieve common goals and aspirations--a process that helps people transform intentions into positive action, visions into reality." 4. Leaders empower and support, rather than control and direct, people toward achieving desired outcomes. All too often, people in authority or high office feel a need to control or limit the options of others, especially those with whom they disagree. This is the conse- quence of untamed ego and self Importance, which over time, if un- checked, produce forms of tyranny. Leadership is not just giving people the resources and the authority to act, it also is helping people learn and grow to develop the capacity to evaluate events and issues, to make decisions on how to proceed, to resolve conflicts and build trust, and to achieve the out- comes they desire. 5. Leaders engender a perspective of "we" and partnership. Leaders work with and through people, recognizing that organizations and communities re- ally are teams of people joined together to ach/eve outcomes no individual can achieve alone. They build a sense of "we" rather than a sense of"them." They do not divide people against each other into camps or factions. They unite people toward common goals. Leaders engage people individually because they know one person can make a difference, but they also know that this one person united with others in a sense of partnership processes the "power of many" captured in the phrase "we the people" and the term "community." Leaders see communities as living entities in which people interact with and mobilize others to bring about change and progress. Healthy commu- nities, successful societies, and even harmonious neighborhoods result from diverse groups focusing on working together toward common goals in a sense of collaboration--a sense of"we." Leaders are the catalysts of union and progress that result from awakening within people the possibilities they possess. In this sense, leaders really are stewards and servants rather than rulers masters. 6. Leaders are principled persons pos- sessing moral behavior, character, values, and integrity. A leader's main strength is the ability to operate dose enough ~o people to draw them to the leader's levd of moral development and matu- rity. If leaders are to elevate people's capacities and-awareness, they first must elevate within others their standards and sense of equity, fairness, prudence, honor, courage, and civility. 7. Leaders promote mutual respect and civility in all relationships. Contro- versy, conflict, and disagreement are natural occurrences in all meaningful relationships. The issue is not that disagreement occurs, but how one deals with that disagreement without being disagreeable, ruddy hostile and, in extreme cases, irrationally immature. Leadership, in reality, is a bottom- up, grassroots phenomenon. It is this type of leadership, leadership from the people at the local and hometown level, that made America more than two centuries ago. The caliber of lead- ership we, as local government officials, provide is a preeminent factor in the very success of our communities. ~ Carl Neu, is executive vice president and general manager of NEU & Company, providing resources and services for governz ment. Mr. Neu will present at the upcomi~Jg LMC Newly Elected and Experienced Offi- cials Conferencqs. See page 14 or visit the Conferences section of the LMC web site at: www.lmnc.or£. © Neu and Company and the Center for the Future of Local Governance TM, 1998. Ail rights reserved. Excerpted with permission of the author. Web site: www.carlneu.com. N OVEMBEK-DECEMBZK 2002 MINNESOTA CITIES -391 - 15 Dec.31ZI~SZ 10:11:3S ~ia F~ -> AMM FAX lie 952472BG28 Kandi's HensOn 'Page 8B2,og, 883 I%lne. mhil im prowa ng ervJoe d,ol ion December 30, 20'02 - January 3, 2-0'03 page ? of 2 III ............... Bali Iifli Governor Elect Announces Metropolitan Council Appointment Process Governor elect Pawlenty has announced the makeup of the nominating commit- tee and schedule for applicants. Tom Weaver of Anoka will chair tile seven member nominating' committee, which also includes: · Sherry Broeoker--.Ms, 8~oeckeris a former legislator and resident of Vadnais Heights. · John Pache~omMr. Pacheo is a resident of Minneapol{s and is em- ployed by Excej Energy. · Michael Button--Mr. Burton is a resident of Minnetonka and is em- ployed by Lundgren Brothers. , Mark Shiffman--Mr. Shlffman is a member of the Waconia City Coun- cil. · Cyndee Fields~Ms. Fields is a member of the Eagan City Council. · Bill Puikrabek~Mr. Pulkabek is former mayor of Oakdale and is cur- rently chair of the Washington County Board of Comrmissioners, Applications for the MetropOlitan Council can be obtained from the $ecreta~ of State's Offi~ at ~sos,s _rate, mn. US or by calling 651-296-2803, The completed applications must be SubrnEted to the Secretary of State's Office by 4:30 p.m. January 10, 2003, Local governments located throughout ~he region will receive a written notice describing the process, The no,ice should be mailed to all local governments this week. A public notice as required by stat- ute will also be published in several news- papers. The nominating committee will review all applicants. Those applicants selected by the committee, as poten§al nominees will be notified by January 17, 2003 of the need to be present at the public meeting scheduled for the district in which the applican[ resides, The nominating com- mittee will conduct public heatings to accept statements from or on behalf of persons who have been nominated or applied and to obtain advice and endorse- ment from the pubiio as well as local elected officials. Following the public meetings the com- mittee will submit a final list of nominees to the Governor. The Governor mus[ con- suit with legislators from the district garcling the potential appointments. The governor however is not required to ap- point from the list of nominees. The Sen- ate must confirm ail appointments to the Metropolitan Council. State law requires that the 16 Council districtS be redrawn, based on the 2000 Census, sometime prior to the end of the 2003 legislative session. Depending on the outcome of the redistricting legisla- tion, appointmenJs made in the next few months might have to be adjusted at a later date. LOCATIONS AND TIMES OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Tuesday, l 1-12-13.14 Ramsey/ lv[e~opolitan Council M~ats Park Centr~ 6:30 p.m. Disttiot 11 ~'anu~ry 21 WasM~gton Chambers, St. Paul 2.30 F, as~ FLfi. h St. 7:30 p.m. Dis~ri~ 12 (6~ 1.602. 1000) St. Paul Ik30 p,m. District 13 9:30 p.m. Diab-ic~ 14 -Wednesday, I-2"~10 Anokag~"~-nnepin Coon Rapid~'ciTM Hall, I 115:5 Robinson Drive NW, 6:~ p.m. Distri~ 1 lanuary 22 AffW Ramsay Council Charnb',r~ Coon Rapids ' 7:30 p.m. Di~U-ict 2 (763.755.28~0) 8:30 p.m. DistriCt 9 9:30 p.m. DiStrict 10 TUe$Ct~tY, 3-6.?-I~ "eonS-al and ~cllna'City Hi~[l, 4801 W $0" sr, adina 6:30 p.m. District 3 lanuary 28 West Henri,pin Council Chambers 7:~0 p.m. Dist/i~t 6 (952.927,g1~61)'. 8:30 p.m. District 7 9:30 p:m. District 8 'Wednesday, 4-5-15-16- Dakota/Scott/ Bura~vllle City Hall, 10(~ 'CiVic-Center Parkway, 6}~'5 p.m/District ~ January 29 So. Hcnnepin Council Chambers Buraavtll~ 7:30 p.m. Dissri,t 1 $ (952.g95.4400) $:30 p.m. District 16 · - 9:30 p.m. District 4 Questions may be directed to Governor-elect Pawleaty's transition office at: Governor-elect Tim ?awlenry B46 State Capitol, 75 Cor~stittition Ave, St. Paul, MN_ 392-' (65 l) 282-5134 ~rnaii: gov.elect~state.mxa,us ])e~ 31 7-1102 11]:12:2B ~ia ['a -> ,Association of Metropo/itan Munid,p~ities Fax News 95.247Zl]h;?~ecl~p3~a;LreOg~ January AMM to, Co-host Discussion with Fannie Mae {~egarding Development Tools for Cities nd Developem AMM along with the Buiidem Association of the Twin Cites (BATC) will co-host a presentation by Fannie Mae regarding its development tools. National and regional staffto discuss the agency's housing and commun~j development financing options will join Fannie Mae's Minnesota office staff, Among the speakers are Carl Riedy, Vice President (Fannie Mae - Washington DC) and Cindy Holler (Director. Fannie Mae, Chicago). The presentation will highlight Minnesota projects such as develop- ments in Minneapolis, Nod. hfield and St, Paul. The discussion is scheduled for: Thursday--January 9, 2003 4:00 p,m,-5:15 p,m. League of Minnesota Cities Building st. Croix Room, first floor 145 University Avenue West St, Paul, MN 55103-2044 Light refreshments will be served, If you wish [o attend please contact Laurie at 651- 215-4000 or laurie@amm 145. org. Allociatio'n of Pletropolit~n Plunicipalitiei 143 ~ntver~i& Ave, n~e ~t $~ PauI~/fin 5S105-2044 Phone: (651) 215-4000 F~: (651) 281.I299 AMM Fax N~t~ Is faxed W all AMM el~Y managers and admintstrato~ iegiSlaliv~ con. tact4' a~d Board memberx. Please shewe this fax with your mayor~, coancilmembers and rlaff to k~ep them abreast of Important m~tto City Issues. - ~,~_ TOTRL P. LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION December 20, 2002 Marc D. Simpson 612-335-1504 marc.simpson~leonard.com Honorable Catherine L. Anderson Judge, Hennepin County District Court Chambers-C 1431 Hennepin County Government Center 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55487 RE: John M. Anderson, et al v. City of Mound Court File NO. 02-11148 Dear Judge Anderson: Pursuant to your Scheduling Order of September 20, 2002, the parties have selected former Judge Schiefelbein as a mediator for this case. The parties have not yet confirmed that Judge Schiefelbein is able to serve as a mediator, but will do so shortly and will complete the mediation by the date set forth in the Scheduling Order (April 18, 2003). Please call if you have .any questions. Very truly yours, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Marc D. Simpson MDS/dj George C. Hoff, Esq. Timothy T. Nolan, Esq. I5o SOUTH FIFTH STREET SUITE ~,3OO MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA $$40~, TEL 612-335-I5OO FAX 6Z2.335.i657 2269392vl LAW OPFICE$ IN MINNEAPOLIS, SAINT PAUL, AiANKATO, SAINT CLOUD AND WASHINGTON, I), C, WW'_394_~D.COM General Fund $677~118 CDBG 1,114 Area Fire Protection ~ervices 297,295 Grant Revolving 0 Cemetery 637 Dock 187,487 PW Facility 105,282 G.O. improvement Bonds Commerce Place TIF (36,752) (194,542) TIF 1-2 Notes 25,578 G.O. Bo,nde 2001 - A 4,263 G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 19,147 HRA Lease Rev Bonds 737,531 Capital Improvement 990,381 MSA 19,963 Sealcoat t ,259 CDB 2,175 Dd~i~t~'n TIF 1~2 . (1,922~098) H~;Pab;ii9 Safety B!dg $~88. ~!4!. Water 1,231,246 Sewer 863,394 .Liquor Store 866,782 Recycling 84,428 Storm Water 602,574 Fire Relief (85,227) HRA 2,541 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months Indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authori2ed transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment Income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not Included. A long. and complete process is followed to record alt transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to Interested parties. in no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 12f23/2002 CashRep0rtCouncil Gino -395- BUDGET REVENUE REPORT Nov. 2002 GENERAL FUND Nov~ 2002 YTD .; Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from Other Funds Charges to Other Departments TOTAL REVENUE 2,253,520 0 1,037,965 (1,215:,~$5) . 6,300· 1,000 8,375 2,075 188,450 16,972 225,574 37,1'21 46%130 0 403,098 (585~32) -137,550 6,367 100,774. ~' :~(36~776) · 1'10,000 14,581 77,892 ~'.' (325108) 145,400 3,220 155~206 .9,806 1281000 0 0 (128~000) ~3.000 102 ~. (266) "3~3.350 ~2..242 FIRE FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCK FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND" RECYCLING FU:ND STORM WATER UTILITY 429,470 6,050 129,360 535,500 1,048,810 2,osd,oo .: 112,0D~ 20,461 477,018 4i,548 200 4,485 (~:,$65) 0 113,932' (15,428) 43,623 518,559 ' (16,941) 86,489 971,121 (77,689) 1505465 1,~07,367'' (342,633) 91.67% I=ERCENT 46.06% 132.94% 119.70%' 87.42% 73.26% 70.81% 106.74% 0.00% 111.07% 74.13% 88.07% 96.84% 92.59% 83.29% 97.14% 90.97% rev01 Gino .-396- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT Nov. 2002 $)1.67% GENERAL FUND Council City Manager/Clerk Elections Finance Assessing Legal City Hall Building & Sm/cs COmputer Police Emergency Prepardeness Plan nih g/inspectio ns Streets Parks Transfers Cable TV Contingencies G'E~IERAE FUND TOTAL Area ~'ir~ ';.~ ~,~: .. Ce,moJ:ery 'Fund Dock Fund TIF 1~2" S~We~und LiquorFund Recycling Fund Storm Water Utility Nov. 2002 YTD BUDGET E_XP_E.N_$~ EXPENSE 79,280 235,100 11,030 201,260 79,700 122,000 89 110 28 250 ,164 600 6.780 266 030 576 610 322 240 207.840 60.860 PERCENT .6,687 78,404 876 98.90% 17,870 214,881 20,219 91.40% 5,000 9,99t 1,039 90.58% 15,867 181,390 19,870 90.13% 4 77,321 2,379 97.02% 12,521 102,832 19,168 84.29% 8,995 75,407 13,703 84.62% 7,343 28,684 (434} 1 01.54% 61,242 892,308 272,292 76.62% 29 6,819 (39) 1 00.58% 28,636 277,643 (11,613) 1 04.37% 98,911 518,425 58,185 89.91% 20,390 28! ,721 40,519 87.43% 17,320 190,520 17,320 91.67% 11,145 ~33186~i 14,139 70.54% o_ 755 60,105 ~ 3.498 ;690. 311,960 2.970,962 527.728 699,470 9,920 132,700 0 577,6160 1,007,420 460,660 155,510 58,200 239,680 8,682. 78,665' (625,99i) 46,5,46 55,231 72,167 37,515 8,001 26,8! 1 459,790 o 1,258 9,444 54,035 44,070 625:,'99'i';' 28,1f8 531,1:i'4 127,28~ 952,189. 24~276 388,493. 9,585 117,995 0 50,199 6..5.73% 12.68% 40.72% '9.~.94% 94.52% 84.33% 75.88% 86.25% Exp-02 12/23/2002 Gino -397- 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Kandis .Hanson- Mound Greg Pederson - Fire Chief Fire Commission Meeting December 16, 2002 The next Mound Fire Department Fire Commission quarterly meeting will be held on January 22, 2003. The details of the meeting and a proposed agenda are as follows: Date: Time: VVhere: Wednesday January 29, 2003 11:00 a.m.- 1:00 p.m. Mound Fire Station Agenda 1. Review fire service and departments survey. 2. Review public safety cost comparison. 3. Discuss fire coverage area changes 2003, 2004. 4. Overview of Mound Public Safety Facility bids / conracts. 5. Miscellaneous discussion. 6. Adjourn. Please note that the minutes from the last meeting are enclosed. As usual, lunch will be provided. Hope to see you here! Regards, Greg .-398- Fire Commission Meeting Minutes Wednesday October 30~ 2002 Attendees: Greg Pederson - Fire Chief, Kandis Hanson - Mound, Gino Businaro - Mound, Sara Irvine - Minnetonka Beach, Craig Dawson - Shorewood, Ron Moorse - Orono, Bill Weeks - Spring Park, Mayor Cheryl Fischer - Minnetrista, Mayor Barb Peterson - Orono Start 11:00 a.m. A detailed overview of all fire department budgeting and accounting practices was presented by Gino Businaro. Gino and Greg also presented and distributed detail on financial plans and budget projections as listed. a. 2003 Mound Fire Budget i. Building - Rental from HRA ii. Budget Contributions - Totals b, Budget Forecast 2003-2006 i. Overhead - Overview c. Review MFD (15) Year Capital Plan i. Tanker 2004-2005 ii. Rescue 2007-2008 iii. Ladder2011-2012 d. ISO Rating was discussed including the follOWing: i. Fire Department ii. Water Supply iii. Communications (911) - Saving Money - Improved Ratings - Last Rating was in 1996 - Upgrading Equipment - Reallocate II. Fire Facility Cost Information review which included breakdown of space allocation and project line item budget. a. Square Footage i. Fire ii. Police b. Budget Worksheet i. Temporary location lease included into project budget ii. $500,000 contingency is set aside iii. $5.3 million project without contingency a detailed Lunch 12:05 p.m. Resume 12:15 p.m. -399- III. New Facility Project design and schedule were discussed including: a. Review final design of facility b. Review project schedule overview c. Discuss bid proposals and' awarded contracts i. Pro's and 'Con's why we delayed start 1. Earthwork grading and excavation ii. Estimates and Bids are within 2-3% of budget iii. Temporary fire department location 1. Balboa Building west (old Tonka Toys) 2. Lease cost is covered in project budget Staffing Issues that were discussed: a. Status on full-time permanent fire chief i. Permanent hire target - late 2003 ii. Competitive process will be followed b. Firefighter applications on file and membership status was discussed, MFD will employ two new members as soon as they complete the process. i. Background checks (2) in process ii. Physical. is next step iii. Agility Test to follow iv, 12 applicants on file c. Volunteer Fire Service issues were discussed and Several concerns were communicated to attendees by Chief Greg Pederson. It was 'suggested that it is in the best interest of all cities to take advantage of the exiting fire department infrastructure and organizations for' various reasons. Topics that were discussed: i. Postponement of joint city council meeting by Orono ii. Advantages of prolonging volunteer fire departments 1. Sound and solid base is in place 2. Demographics will change as cities grow 3. Generally volunteer fire service is economical 4. Recruiting new members is a challenge 5. Training new firefighters takes 12-15 months Other Pertinent Issues a. Delivery of new engine from Salisbury i. May 20, 2003 b. Review of response time for all cities c. Mound Fire response to Orono RFP for fire service and information available / RFP copies. ,-400- 2415 WilShire Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor Meisel Kandis Hanson - City Manager Greg Pederson - Fire Chief Small Pox Vaccination Information December 18, 2002 Last week John McKinley, Kevin Sipprell, and I attended an informational meeting regarding small pox vaccination for emergency preparedness. '1 have enclosed some information for your review and your file. Greg -401 - Hennepin County Memo' Transportation Department Emergency Prepam~ss Division 1600 Prairie Drive Medina MN 55340-5421 Phone: Fax: TDD: t~eCYCled 763-745-7625 763-478-4001 763-478-4030 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 10, 2002 Wade Setter, Hennepin County Chiefs Steve Longaecker, Hennepin County Fire Chiefs Association Kelly Spratt, Hennepin County Medical Center Martin Van Buren, EMS Providei's Tim Tumbull; Hermepin County l~mergency P~'eparedness Smallpox vaccination Information As recognized leaders in your respective services, Hennepin County Emergency Preparedness in conjunction with Hennepin County Community Health and Hennepin County Medical Center invite you to a special informational meeting regarding smallpox vaccination for law enforcement, fire, emergency management and EMS personnel. This is Phase II of the national smallpox vaccination program. Please forward this invitation to the members ofyo.ur organization/service. We request that each department send its police and fire chief or his/her designee, and the emergency manager. The meeting will be held on: Thursday, December 12 0900-1100 hours Plymouth Creek Center 14800 34th Ave, Plymouth* This meeting will provide information and guidance on how to plan for and handle the vaccination of your staff. Your attendance and the attendance 'of your colleagues is very important. If you have questions,' please call Ti.m Turnbull (763-745-7621) or JUdy Rue (763-745-7620). Additional information on smallpox can be found the CDC website: http ://www. bt. cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/ind ex. asp Directions: Hwy 55 to Plymouth Blvd. North on Plymouth Blvd to 32"a. Right on 32~ to Minnesota Lane N. Left on Minnesota Lane N to Plymouth Creek Center. ' or ' www. mapquest.com ~ .-402- Minnesota Department of Health 11/21/02 General Advisory Regardlng Pre-event Smallpox Vaccination Over the last several months, there has been a great dca] of activity within the public health m~d me~cal care communities regarding smallpox, and its potential re-emergence as a public health ,tt~reat. In October, the 'federal government sharedgI with the media and the public, a proposed three-stage plan for increasing U.S. preparedness in advance of any potential terrorist action involving the use of the smallpox virus. In phase one of the plan, a limited number of targeted health care and public health workers would be vaccinated, in order to assure that each state has the minimum capacityneeded to respond ff there is a terrorist event involving smallpox. In phase two, vaccination would be offered to a larger number of health and emergency response personnel, in order to increase the size of the workforce that would be available to respond to a smallpox event. In phase three,.the general public would be given the option of getting vaccinated, along with counseling about the risks associated with the vaccine. , Like other state health agencies throughout the county, the M-/nnesota Department of Health has been exploring the issues sun-ounding "pre-event" smallpox vaccination. At this point, the President has announced no final decision about the scope or tinmg of a pre-event vaccination program. HOwever, we believe it would be prudent to assume that - at a minimum - the first phase this effort will 'be launched in the very near future. We further believe that the scope of the vaccination program could expand rapidly after the/nitial phase is begun. ~ We want to emphasize that we have no hard information that we can share with 'you about ti-tis matter. However, we are acutely aware of tile impact that a pre-event immunization effortlwould have on our partners and Colleagues in the local public health and health care prov/der communities. For that reason, despite the uncertainties involved, Office of Emergency Preparedness 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 400 St. Paul, IvIN 55101 651-296-0047 www.health.state.mn.us -403- we wanted to share with you ~)ur general sense of how this issue is unfolding. ~re believe it important that you begin Cmsi'defing the potential impact of a pre-event vaCcin'ati'dri effort off yew activities and operations, if you haven'.t d°n~*that ake, ady. Many of you have already been directly involved in our discuss/on Of pre-event irnmurdzation at the state level. However, we would like to take this opportunity to stress a number of key points about pre-event vaccination: · The likelihood of an actual terrorist incident involving smallpox is still considered extremely low. The case for pre-event vaccination is based on the fact that the actual risk cannot beknown or calculated - and the fact that the impact of a smallpox event, if it did occur, could be devastating. .. · Our planning for pre-ev6nt vaccination emphasized the importance of vaccinafifig;' individuals who would have some role tO:plaY in responding to a smallpoX event.- in fi*..: "· particular, public health personnel~ em~gency. response personnel and specific types of health care providers. .. · In our init/al planning efforts, we have assumed that MDH personnel - in collaboration w/th local public health - would take primary respons~ility for administering the vaccine. However, if there is .a substantial mcre~e:m the number ofp¢ople tO be vac6inaied, it ~l~bo necessary to increase the invo!~ement ofiocal:'" public health agencies,md enlist the help of '' other qualified persons in thc ~ommunity?;~H staff would still be, resp .o.n.m'ble for "vaca~g V ' ' .... "' ::" '~ ' ~":")'~:'!~"~"' .. the accmators, before we could procec~l*nth.. an expanded vaccination eff~/t; · In no case would pre-event vaccination be required.'Vaccination would be complet~i',~ voluntary- both for/nd/v/duals and for organizations like hospitals or medical clinics. No hospital or health care organization would be required to take part in a pre-event vaccination effort. General Advisory Regarding Pre-ev ent Smallpox Vaccination - page 2 · Nonetheless, under current plms for respon'~ing to an actual smallpox outbreak, hospitals W/th negative pressure isolation rooms would be requ/recl to pro,fide care for the first sm~illpox · cases, on a 24/7 basis, until others in .the hospital can be vaccinated. That task can be done more effectively if staff who may be exposed to smallpox patients have been vaccinated in advance. · Hospital personnel could still be vaccinated after a smallpox attack has already occurred. The vaccine still offers protection ff it is given up to three days after an ind/v/dual is exposed to the virus. However, thc need to vaccinate staff at. that point could interfere with patient care or other critical tasks. FOr that reason, we recommend that designated health care teams, in hospitals and other health care facilities, be ., ?accinated in advance'of any actual xmall2vox attack. · In previous ~lraft planning documents, we have suggested that hospital response teams include the following key personnel: · infection control practitioners · registered nUrses · physicians · laboratory staff · pharmacy personnel · chaplains or spiritual connsel0r~ · housekeeping, dietary and laundry personnel · building engineers or others responsible for building ventilation. · team leaders ..'.· ..pediatric specialists · radiology and resp/ratory therapy personnel medical examiners .' . bther personnel at the discretion of the Recommendations have als° been developed for the composition of other pre-vaccinated response teams. Those include public health and emergency management teams, vaccination teams, law enforcement personnel, other public safety personnel, and personnel responsible for maintaining critical Public infrastructure. In an effort to minimize the'impact of adverse vaccine reactions, it has been recommended that c. erta, in individuals be excluded from pre- evener vaccination. Contra/nd/cations for pre- event Vaccination'include pregnancy, conditions or medical treatments that may comprom/se the immune system, and skin conditions like eczema or atopic dermatitis. It has been estimated that up to 30 percent of the population may be ineligible for pre-event smallpox vaccination because of contraindicafions. Planning for the establishment of smallpox response teams should take that fact into account. One of the issues explored in discussions of pre-event vaccination is the potential impact of vac,inahng personnel on hospital and el/nit operations. Vaccinated staff may m/ss work because of normal reactions to the vaccine, and the shedding ofvaccirfia virus by vaccinated 'individuals could pose a concern for hospital operations. The CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has concluded that immunized health care staff do not need to be excluded from ndrmal work activities. However, vaccinated individuals should take appropriate steps to avoid exposing others to virus from the wound created by the vaccination process. Individual hospitals and health care facilifits will want to carefully review these issues, and adopt appropriate policies and procedures. MDH staff are available to discuss the ACIP recommendations and operational issues. Under legislation just passed by Congress (the Homeland Security Act), the federal government would assume legal liability - under certain circumstances - for injuries - resulting from a pre-event vaccination program. This transfer of liability would apply to all vaccination activities authorized as "countermeasUres" aga/nst bioterrorism, under the terms of a formal declaration issued by the new Secretary of Homeland Security. This prowsmn applies to injuries resulting from vaccinia infections in unvaccinated individuals, as well as adverse vaccine reactions. Manufacturers 9fvaccine or vaccinia immune globulin (used for treatment of adverse r~actions), and health care organizations or qualified indiv/duals who adm/rfistcred these products, would be relieved of liability for actions performed under the authority of a federal ."countermeasUre" declaration. We expect further information on these important legal issues to be available 15om the Department of Health and Human Services in the very near future. --.-404- ,, · gennep]n Coun~ ' ' Commumty Rea]th Department Public Health emergencyis any situation where there is a threat to the.health of the, population. These events include natural and man-made disasters including pandemic influenza,, a bioterrorism attack, as well as floods, tomadoes The federal Voluntary Pre-event Smallpox VacCination Program Goal: To increase the U.S. preparedness in advance of any potential terrorist action involving the use of smallpox. ~ Pre-event refers to the situation, state there are no cases of smallpox any where in the world. Three phases: PhaSe I: Offers voluntary smallpox vaccination to teams of public health staff for epidemiological investigation, teams of vaccinators and to hospital staff for patient care teams. Phase H: Offers voluntary smallpox vaccination to. all health care workers, public health workers, emergency responders and essential personnel. Phase III: Offers voluntary smallpox vaccination to the general public The federal government is exPected to .announce this pre-event vaccination program soon. Implementation of phase I is expected to begin in early January with Phase II to begin soon after. If you haye questi0~ or sugg.estionS ple, aSe contact uS :at Hermepin C0~ty CQ~unity Health Depm~nt, Public Health Emergency PreParedness Team at 952'3 5125'220, or em~!~i mary:i°'ffitZ@C°:hennepin:m-us or ginn. y~baresch@co.hennepin.mn.us. -405- SMALLPOX FACT SHEET Who Should NOT Get the Smallpox Vaccine? (,Unless they are Exposed to the Smallpox Virus) Expectant mothers? People with eczema or atopic dermatitis? People being treated for cancer? People who are HIV-positive? People who have had an organ transplant? ANswER: All of the above. Here's why Some people are at greater risk for serious side effects from the smallpox vaccine. :individuals who have any of the following conditions, or live with someone who does, should NOT get the smallpox vaccine unless they have been exposed to the smallpox virus. Higher risk conditions are: · Eczema or atopic dermatitis. (This is true even if the condit on' is not currently active, mild or experienced as a child.) · Skin conditions such as burns, chickenpox, shingles, impetigo, herpes, severe acne, or psoriasis. (People with any of these conditions should not get the vaccine until they have completely healed.) · Weakened immune system. (Cancer treatment, an organ transplant, HIV, or medications to treat autoimmune disorders and other illnesses can weaken the immune system.) · Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant within one month of vaccination. addition, individuals should not get the smallpox vaccine if they: · Are allergic to the vaccine or any of its ingredients. · Are less than :~8 years of age. · Have a moderate or severe short-term illness. (These people should wait until they are completely recovered to get the vaccine.) · Are currently breastfeeding. Aqain, people who have been directly exposed to the smallpox virus should qet the vaccine~ reoardles$ of their, health statu$~ Don't Hesitate! if offered, the smallpox vaccine, individuals should tell their immunization provider if they have any of the above conditions, or even if they suspect they might. For more information, visit .www cdc.qov/smallpox, or call the CDC public response hotline at (888) 246-2675 (English), (888) 246-2857 (EspaSol), or (866) 874-2646 (TTY) December 9, 2002 .. .-406- sma -407- .' How is smallpox spread? Smallpox normally spreads from contact with infected persons. Generally, direct and fairly prolonged face- to-face contact is requi~ed to spread smallpox ~rom one person to another. Smallpox also can be spread through direct contact with infected bodily fluids or contaminated objects such as bedding c~r clothing. Indirect spread is less common. Rarely, smallpox has been spread by virus carried in the air in enclosed settings such as buildings, buses, and trains. Smallpox is not known to be transmitted by ir~sects or animals. :If smallpox is released in aerosol form, how long does the virus survive? The smallpox virus is fragile. In laboratory experiments, 90% of aerosolized smallpox virus dies within 24 hours; in the presence of ultraviolet (UV) light, this percentage would be even greater. ]:f a n aerosol release of smallpox occurs, 90% of virus matter will be inactivated or dissipated in about 2.4 hours. ' How many People would have to get smallpox before it is considered an outbreak? One confirmed case of smallpox is considered a public health emergency. TS smallpox contagious before the smallpox symptoms show? A person with smallpox is sometimes contagious with onset of fever (prodrome phase), but: the person becomes most contagious with the onset of rash. The infected person is contagious until the last smallpox scab falls off. . :Is there any treatment for smallpox? Smallpox can be prevented through use of the smallpox vaccine. There is no proven treatment for smallpox, but research to evaluate new antiviral agents is ongoing. Early results from laboratory studies suggest that the drug cidofovir may fight against the smallpox virus; currently~ studies with animals are being done to better understand the drug's ability to treat smallpox disease (the use of cidofovir to treat smallpox or smallpox reactions should be evaluated and monitored by experts at NTH and CDC). Patients with smallpox can benefit from supportive therapy (e.g., intravenous fluids, medicine to control fever or pain) and antibiotics for any secondary bacterial infections that may occur. The Vaccine What is the smallpox vaccine, and is it still required? The smallpox vaccine is the only way to Prevent smallpox. The vaccine Is made from a virus called vaccinia, which is another "po×"-type virus related to smallpox but cannot cause smallpox. The vaccine helps the body develop immunity to smallpox. :It was successfully used to eradicate smallpox from the human population. Routine vaccination of the American public against smallpox stopped in :[972 after the disease was eradicated in the United States. Until recently, the U.S. government provided the smallpox vaccine only to a few hundred scientists and medical professionals who work with smallpox and similar viruses in a research se~i. ng. After the events of September and October, 200:L, hoWever, the U.S. government took further actions to improve its level of preparedness against terrorism. For smallpox, this included, updating a response plan and ordering enough smallpox vaccine to immunize the American public in'the event of a smallpox outbreak. The plans are in place, and there is sufficient vaccine available to immunize evewone who might need It in the event of an emergency. Should T get vaccinated against smallpox? The smallpox vaccine is not available to the public at this time. -408- How is ~he va'b~inel g~v.en.=. -409- Vaccine Safety How safe is the smallpox vaccine? The smallpox vaccine is the best protection you can get if you are exposed to the smallpox virus. Host people experience normal, usually mild reactions that include a sore arm, fever, and body aches. Tn recent tests, one in three people felt bad enough to miss work, school, or recreational activity or had trouble sleeping after receiving the vaccine. However, the vaccine does have some risks, in the past, about :[,000 people for every :[ million people vaccinated for the first time experienced reactions that, while not life- threatening,, were serious. These reactions include a vigorous (toxic or allergic) reaction at the site of the vaccination and spread of the vaccinia virus (the live virus in the smallpox vaccine) to other parts of the body and to other people. These reactions typically do not require medical a~ention. Rarely, people have had vew bad reactions to the vaccine. :~n the past, between ::[4 and 52 people Per I million vaccinated experienced potentially life-threatening reactions, including eczema vaccinatum, progressive vaccinia (or vaccinia necrosum), or postvaccinal encephalitis. Based on past experience, it is estimated that between 1 and 2 people out of every :[ million people vaccinated will die as a result of life-threatening reactions to the vaccine. Carefu screening of potential vaccine recipients is essential to ensure that thOse at increased risk do not receive the vaccine. People most likely to have side effects are people who have, or even once had, skin conditions, (especially eczema or atopic dermatitis) and people with weakened immune systems, such as those who have received a transplant, are HTV positive, or are receiving treatment for cancer. Anyone who falls within these categories, or lives with someone who falls into one of these categories, should NOT get the smallpox vaccine unless they are exposed to the disease. Pregnant women should not get the vaccine because of the risk it poses to the fetus. Women who are breastfeeding should not get the vaccine. · Anyone who is allergic to the vaccine or any of its components should not get the vaccine, and anyone under the age of :[8 should not get the vaccine--unless they are exposed to smallpox: Who should NOT get the vaccine? People who should not get the vaccine include anyone who is allergic 'to the vaccine or any of Its components; pregnant women; women who are breastfeeding; anyone under the age of :[8; people who have, or have had, skin conditions (especially eczema and atopic dermatitis); and people with weakened immune systems, such as those who have received a transplant, are HTV positive, are receiving treatment for cancer, or are taking medications (like steroids) that suppress the immune system. These people should not receive the vaccine unless they have been exposed to smallpox. Should you get the smallpox vaCcine if you have a weakened immune system (e.g., you are immunocompromised)? No, you should not be vaccinated~ unless there is a smallpox outbreak and you have been directly exposed to the smallpox virus. Vaccination can cause deaths in people with weakened immune systems. Thus, there is no need to take the risks associated with smallpox vacdnation unless you have been directly . a×posed to smallpox--and even then, you should first consult a physician or health care provider. ' Pregnant women are discouraged from getting the vaccine. Is there a danger to them (or to an unborn child) if broader vaccination occurs~ increasing the potential for contact with vaccinated people? Pregnant women should NOT be vaccinated In the absence of a smallpox outbreak because of risk of fetal infection. Inadvertent transmission of vacctnla virus to a pregnant woman could also put the fetus at .risk. Vaccinated persons must be very cautious to prevent transmission of the vaccine virus to pregnant women or other contacts. -410- Zs there any way to treat bad reactions to the vaccine? Two treatments may help people who have certain serious rea~ions to the smallpox vaccir~e. These are Vaccinia Immune Globulin (VTG) and cidofovir. Currently there are 700 doses of V:[G on hand (enough for predicted reactions with 6 million .people vaccinated), and 3,500 doses of cidofovi, r (enough for predicted reactions with :5 million people vaccinated). Additional doses of V:[G are being producedf and measures are underway to increase supplies of cidofovir as well. VlG and cidofovir are both administered under investigational new drug (:[ND) protocol. For more information, visit www.cdc.qov/smallpox, or call the CDC public response hotline at (888) 246-2675 (English), (888) 246-2857 (Espafiol), or (866) 874-2646 (TTY) December 3, 2002 , .-411 - Mound Fire Department 241,5 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 November 12, 2002 Re: Western Area Fire Training Academy -W.A.F.T.A. Dear W.A.F.T.A. Members This letter is to inform all W.A.F.T.A. members of the meeting that has been scheduled for December 5, 2002 at 3:00 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Mound City Hall located at 5341 Maywood Rd. AGENDA W.A.F.T.A. Site Update a. Current status and document review b. Details of meeting with Congressman Jim Ramstad c. Anticipated progress and future plans for the site Financial Status a. Present financial status b. Anticipated expenses in 2003 c. Invoices for approval 3. Open Discussion Please make plans to attend this meeting or send a representative from your City. Your participation is needed and appreciated. Sincerely, Gregory S. Pederson Mound Fire Chief W.A.F.T.A. Vice President Westem Area Fire Training Academy (WAFTA) Meeting Minutes December 5, 2002 General A update WAFTA meeting was held on December 5, 2002 for ail Executive Committee Members and member cities. A copy of the meeting agenda is enclosed for your information. Meeting Summary 1. The WAFTA Executive Board authorized Geomatrix (and Christopher Thompson) to proceed with a complete and thorough review of all documents that WAFTA has. Geomatdx has completed a "draft" document summary that was shared with attendees. Don Uram and Christopher Thompson provided a verbal overview of the document review purpose, process, and current status. Final document review results copies will be forwarded to all member cities within the next 2-3 weeks. Several items were discussed relatiVe to WAFTA's current status and future options related to continuing with the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VIC) vs. allowing the site to become a superfund site. Chris Thompson explained the differences and potential issues with ViC vs. Superfund Program, pro's and con's. Craig Dawson commented that if WAFTA decides to discontinue with the Voluntary Cleanup Program, we need to issue a public statement to eliminate public relations issues. Greg Pederson advised committee members of the basic details of WAFTA meeting with Congressman. Jim Ramstad. Congressman Ramstad was provided information regarding WAFTA site environmental issues and was asked to help get government priority assistance. Congressman Ramstad agreed to help. Invoices for consulting fees- Geomatrix, waste removal- BFI, and WAFTA site cleanup - Tom Schmieg were approved for payment. Invoice total approved for payment $5,660.50 motion to pay bills by Eden Prairie, second by Watertown. Motion passed - unanimously. Miscellaneous - Rod McCharles of Mound was in attendance and is interested in purchasing the WAFTA site for a personal residence, and horse barn. -413- Ned Schroeder of Watertown F.D. advised the committee that the City of Watertown requests membership on the Executive Board. We are still waiting for approved signed resolutions on this matter from several member cities. Motion to adjourn by Watertown, second by Eden Prairie. Motion passed unanimously. Attachments -414-