Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2003-01-28
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 2003 - 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE o APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: DEC 14, 2003 REGULAR MEETING *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 415-421 422-447 o *C. APPROVE OPERATIONS PERMIT REQUESTED BY MEDIACOM *D. APPROVE OPERATIONS PERMIT REQUESTED BY CITY OF MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT *E. APPROVE RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING FUNDING OF SENIOR PROGRAMS THROUGH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT *F. APPROVE DECLARATION OF EASEMENT TO ESTABLISH A NON-EXCLUSIVE, PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSES: MOUND POST OFFICE *G. APPROVE 2003 DOCK MAP CHANGES *H. APPROVE NOT WAIVING THE STATUTORY LIMITS FOR LIABILITY COVERAGE AS PROVIDED BY LMCIT *I. APPROVE PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT FOR PERFORMANCE PROMOTIONS COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) 448-476 477-489 490-491 492-494 495-505 506 507-508 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. o 10. 11. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING PROJECT A. REPORT BY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER TODD CHRISTOPHERSON B. ACTION MAKINCi CERTAIN BID AWARDS 509-512 513 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. ACTION ON REQUEST BY MIKE KRAMER FOR RELEASE OF T AX FORFEITED PARCEL 514-545 ACTION ON ASSIGNMENT OF MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE SAC CREDITS - 2240/2244 COMMERCE BLVD - MUELLER/ LANSING BUILDING 546-547 ANNUAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A. DISCUSSION/ACTION ON STREET CONSTRUCTION AND RECONSTRUCTION POLICIES 548-557 ACTION APPROVING RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 558-559 ACTION SETTING SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOP: REC'D 2/18 OR 3/4 A. SERVICE DISTRICTS B. 2003 BONDING NEEDS INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS mo B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Correspondence: LMCD N~-wsletter: Gillespie Center Newsletter: Metropolitan Council Update: Dreamwood commons lawsuit Update: MCES lift station project Minutes: DACAC - Jan 16, 2003 Friday Fax Report: 2002 Planning Commission cases 560-576 577 578-581 582-597 598 599-601 602 603-606 J. K. L. M. N. FYI: Voting requirements for council actions FYI: Thank you to Mound Fire Department Report: Mound Police Department - Dec 2002 Update: 2003 CDBG Report: VFW charitable gambling donation 607 608 609-628 629-630 631-632 FYI: Streamlining Governing Body Meetings (this information in packet is not numbered) 12. ADJOURN This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citvo£mound, com. More current meeting COUNCIL BRIEFING January 28, 2003 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Jan 27 - 7:00 - Joint CC/PC Special Meeting Jan 28 - 7:00 -HRA regular meeting Jan 28 - 7:10 -Photo sitting for Mayor, Council, Attorney and Manager Jan 28 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Jan 29 - 11:00 - Fire Commission meeting (Pat only) Jan 30 - 6:00 - Volunteer Appreciation at VFW Feb 17 - City Hall closed for President's Day Feb 24 - 3:30 - Personnel Committee (Pat and Bob only) Feb 26 - 9:00 - Police Chief interviews (Pat only) Feb 26 - 6:30 - Meet the Candidates forum Mar 1 - 11:00 - Public Safety facility groundbreaking Mar 1 - 6:00 - Chamber of Commerce Mid-Winter Ball Mar 15 - 10:00 - Mound Visions Update - Gillespie Center Upcoming Absences Feb 9-16 - Bob Brown - personal time off Feb 14 - Kandis Hanson- City Manager's mid-winter conference Mar 8-26 - Pat Meisel - personal time off Mar 13-14 - Kandis Hanson - personal time off Mar 26-30 - Kandis Hanson - personal time off Council Photo Op The Mayor, Council Members, and City Attorney should come to the Jan 28 meeting prepared for pictures. Competitive quotes were requested of two firms and came in as follows: Linda's Photograph Rodrigo Plaza Photograph $127.80 $282.49 Participants are suggeSted to dress in darker colors for the pictures. Thanks! Appreciation Dinner The Volunteer Appreciation starts with a cash bar at 6:00 this Thursday, followed by dinner at 7:00. There will be a head table for Mayor, Council and guests, and a set agenda, being carried out by staff. #10. Set Special Meeting Please bring your calendars to consider a special meeting workshop on two topics--service districts as a means of uniform service provision in the publicly owned portions of the new downtown and discussion and direction regarding the various projects and the financing needed to proceed, provided through bonded indebtedness. Reps from Hoisington Koegler Group will lead the first discussion and Jim Prosser will lead the second one. #11.N. Governing Body Meetings Enclosed are handouts on carrying out efficient and legal public meetings. I will leave it to council members to decide if they would like to make this a discussion item at this or a future meeting. It would be my suggestion that members highlight some of the content and agree on two or three things that you would to do to improve upon meetings. I will leave this part of the meeting agenda up to you. Personnel: Police Chief Search The candidate from Grand Forks, Byron Seiber, has taken another opportunity and so won't be interviewing with us. I believe it is important to interview four candidates so am going back to the pool next week to select a replacement. We will publicly announce the replacement when I have completed my phone interview process with one or more candidates. Public Works Director/City Engineer Work is underway on the hiring of a Public Works Director/Ciw Engineer. Initially, that involves the creation of a job description for the new position and a revised job description for others falling under that title. It is my hope to begin advertisements within the next two weeks, and have this person in place in June. I will be handling all facets of this hiring process. Other: Chamber Ball The 21st annual Mid-Winter Ball will be held this year on Saturday evening, March 1st at the Lafayette Country Club. As a Chamber Board member, I am selling tickets. They are $55 per person which includes dinner, silent auction, casino night and dancing to a live band. This is an annual fundraiser for the Chamber and it benefits local food shelves and the Chamber Scholarship program. Old Post Office Demo It is still expected that the old post office will be demolished the week of Jan 27. John Cameron is working with the contractor for an exact date. The Laker will be notified of the activity. A groundbreaking for the greenway project will be held in the spring. Ci.ty Hall Improvements With the low quotes secured, there will be a meeting of all the contractors involved in the City Hall maintenance project on Jan 28. Improvements will include some changes to the public space inside the front door of City Hall that will move the receptionist behind an opening in the current copy center. The copy center will then move to the Clerk's office. The current receptionist area will be converted to a customer seating area. This change in layout and relocation of people resources was one of the ideas included in the space needs study. It was deemed important to make these changes as part of the updating of City Hall, since the installation of new carpet--intended to last 10 years--sets in stone the layout and functionality of the building for that length of time. In addition to carpentry work, to be performed by Dave Willette, water damage will be fixed, and paint, wallpaper, carpet and horizontal mini blinds replaced. Vertical blinds on floors 4 and 5 will remain. We will also retain some of the existing art work. An exterior air duct will be added to the outside of the building that will pull fresh air from the top of the building. New Liquor Store There will be a walkthrough of the new store on Jan 29, to determine its state of readiness. Mound MarketPlace continues to hold firm to the Feb 1 turnover date. Layout proposals are being taken by John C from the various vendors, who will have big roles in setting the new store. The agreement with Mound MarketPlace is a contract for deed, with insurance going into effect the day of turnover. However, we do not receive title to the property until six months later, when we make our final payment. I my opinion, an ideal move-in date would coincide with that of Jubilee Foods. A ribbon cutting will take place about two weeks after we take possession of the building interior, once all the details of set-up, marketing, staffing, etc, can be adequately attended to. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES` JANUARY 14, 2003 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Engineer John Cameron, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Jeff Andersen, Steve Smith, Julie Luedke, Becky Glister, Robert Huffman, Michael Mueller, Betty Weiland, Todd Christopherson, Vern Hanson, Larry Olson, Steve Behnke, Geoff Michael, James Copher. Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roil call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Meisel opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 2, SWEARING IN OF COUNCILMEMBERS Mayor Meisel and Councilmembers Brown, Hanus and Osmek were sworn in. 3. SPECIAL RECOGNITION OF SERVICE FOR FRANK WEILAND MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-01: RESOLUTION TO NAME NEWLY CREATED PARK IN THE METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT, OUTLOT C, MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION Mayor Meisel and all of the Councilmembers each gave a verbal tribute to Frank Weiland, followed by comments of appreciation and affection from Geoff Michael, Michael Mueller, Steve Smith, Greg Pederson & Jeff Andersen (Mound Fire Department), and James Copher (Post 398). Osmek presented the above resolution in a frame to Betty Weiland, along with concept drawings for the Frank W. Weiland park sign. 1 -415- 4. APPROVE AGENDA MeJsel requested that items 'i 'IA and 'I 'i B be reversed. Hanson added the incumbent's names (Becky Glister and Jorj Ayaz) to item 8A, added 'i 1 .'i, Change Order for Post Office Demolition, and added 'i2.'i, Police Chief Selection Update. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. CONSENT AGENDA Meisel requested the removal of items D and G. Osmek requested removal of item A, Hanus asked removal of item L, and Meyer asked removal of item J. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. (removed) B. Approve payment of December 24th claims in the amount of $388,876.70, and approval of January 14th claims in the amount of $384,667.66. C. RESOLUTION NO. 03-02: RESOLUTION APPOINTING GINO BUSlNARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR, ACTING CITY MANAGER FOR 2003. D. (removed) E. RESOLUTION NO. 03-03: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK F. RESOLUTION NO. 03-04: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY TREASURER/FINANCE DIRECTOR G. (removed) H. RESOLUTION NO. 03-05: RESOLUTION APPOINTING COUNCILMEMBER MARK HANUS AS ACTING MAYOR FOR 2003. I. RESOLUTION NO. 03-06: RESOLUTION APPOINTING JIM FACKLER AS ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR 2003. J. (removed) K. Approve agreement and contract for building inspection services by Paul Waldron and Associates, Ltd. L. (removed) M. 1. Approve Payment Request #3 to Sunram's for $67,968.77, for the 2002 Retaining Wall Replacement 2. Approve Payment Request #3 to Dave Perkin Contracting, Inc., for $37,922.36, for the 2002 Storm Sewer Improvements 3. Approve Payment Request #4 to Doboszenski & Sons for $24,492.04 for Mound Visions 2® Addition. 2 -416- Mound City Counci~ Minutes- January 14, 2003 5A. APPROVE MINUTES Hanus and Osmek requested changes on the draft of the minutes of December 10, 2002. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to approve the minutes of the December 10, 2002 meeting as amended, the December 23, 2002 special meeting, and the December 31,2002 special meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5D. DESIGNATE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER Mayor Meisel did not participate in discussion or voting on this matter because the Laker is a tenant in a building that she owns. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer. Mayor Meisel abstained from voting. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-07: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LAKER AS THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 2003. 5G. DESIGNATE THE OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR 2003 Mayor Meisel did not participate in discussion or voting on this matter because she serves on the Board for Wells Fargo. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer. Mayor Meisel abstained from voting. RESOLUTION NO. 03-08: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR 2003. 5J. APPOINTMENT OF COUNCILMEMBERS AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES FOR 2003. Meyer requested that this be pulled from the consent agenda to recognize that Councilmembers serve on various board and commissions, which takes additional time and expressed his appreciation for everything they do. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-09: RESOLUTION APPOINTING COUNClLMEMBERS AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES FOR 2003. 3 -417- Mound City Council Minutes - January 14, 2003 5L. RESOLUTION AMENDING 2003 FEE SCHEDULE - PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT Hanus suggested that when staff determines if a project on public lands is minor or major, they also determine if there is public benefit. He suggested not having a charge for a minor work (value less than $1000) and a fee of $200 for major (over $1000) if there is public benefit to the project. Brief discussion followed. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adopt the policy that Public Lands Permits for minor work (value under $1000) have no fee associated with them, and that major (over $1000) have a $200 fee only the project has public benefit, and that the following resolution be adopted to accommodate the above fee. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-10: RESOLUTION AMENDING FEE SCHEDULE 6. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY SUBJECT NOT ON THE AGENDA None were offered. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING PROJECT A. Report by Construction Manaqer, Todd Christopherson. Todd Christopherson of Amcon presented an update to the Council. B. Bid Awards MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to award the following bids. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Contract C-02 Contract C-08 Contract C-10 Contract C-16 Contract C-32 Contract C-33 Veit & Company, Rogers, $567,800. Concrete - Kelleher Const., of Burnsville - $466,872 (base bid $430,372 + alternate 8, $36,500) Masonry- Axel Ohman of Mpls - $160,000 (base bid $283,000 less alternate 8, $123,000) Doors, Frames, Hardware - Straughan Hardware of Mpls $47,233 Mechanical Const. - Allied Mechanical of Hutchinson - $613,650. Electrical Const. - Ridgedale Elec., Long Lake - $362,000 8. ACTION ON RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITIZEN APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to make the following appointments. in favor. Motion carried. A. Planning Commission - Greg Raines, Becky Glister and Jori Ayaz. B. Docks & Commons Commission - Frank Ahrens and Gerald Jones All voted 4 -418- Mound City Council Minutes - January 14, 2003 9. APPOINTMENT TO FIRE DISTRICT STUDY GROUP Mayor Meisel recommends Bob Brown to serve on this study group, with Meisel serving as an alternate in Brown's absenCe. It was noted that the Fire Chief and City Manager also serve on this study group. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to appoint Bob Brown to serve on the Fire District Study Group. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 10. CONSIDERATION/APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO APPROVE STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TO A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE PURSUANT TO 350.420~ SUBD. 8- ROBERT HUFFMAN Sarah Smith reviewed the request. Brown questioned if the Planning Commission should have considered this application before it came to the Council. Smith stated that the city code does not require this to go before the Planning Commission. It was requested that the procedure be investigated and clarified for the future. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-11' RESOLUTION APPROVING STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TOA NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE ON LOT 14, BLOCK 2, WHIPPLE SHORES AT 5124 TUXEDO BOULEVARD. 11. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS A. Case #02-41 - MetroPlains Development- Mound Marketplace Si.qn Height Variance Smith explained that this variance request is for a 25' area identification sign for Mound Marketplace. Vern Hanson and Larry Olson from MetroPlains presented the proposed sign plans to the Council. After review, the Planning Commission voted 5 to 2 to recommend approval of the variance with the height reduced to 20'. Length discussion followed regarding the pros and cons of a sign of this nature in this location. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-12: RESOLUTION APPROVING A HEIGHT VARIANCE TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF AN AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN AT MOUND MARKETPLACE - PID #14-117-24-44-0067, P&Z CASE #02-41. 5 -419- Mound City Council Minutes- January 14, 2003 B. Case #03-02/03-03: Brenshell Homes/Mark Lee - 1975 Lakeside Lane, Minor Subdivision/Setback Variance. Steve Behnke, representing Brenshell Homes, addressed the council to discuss the utility trunk and connection charges for the subject property, as the existing parcel includes two original platted lots that were combined by a former owner. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-13: RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND (20) FOOT FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1975 LAKESIDE LANE, P&Z CASE #03-02 AND 03-03. C. Action on request by Mike Kramer for release of tax forfeited parcel. It was noted that the applicant was not present tonight, nor did he appear before the Parks Commission when this topic was discussed. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to table this item until the next meeting, with notice going to the applicant, asking him to appear. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 11.1 CHANGE ORDER FOR POST OFFICE DEMOLITION MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve Change Order #1 for'the Post Office Demolition, in the amount of $6,930.00. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 12. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS A. Consideration of proposed settlement offer-Alfred & Lois Saqe- Westedqe Boulevard Improvement Assessment Upon returning from executive session, John Dean explained that he discussed with the Council, a propose settlement in the above stated matter. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-14: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SETTLEMENT OF PENDING LITIGATION B. Consideration of proposed settlement for land reqistration - Rohullah & Kristi Vedadhaqhi- Lot 82, Phelps Island Park First Division... Upon return from executive session John Dean explained that the city has given consent to allow registration of a parcel of land, conserving rights to the 15' utility easement. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Assent to Registration, assenting to the application to register title to the subject property. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 6 -420- Mound City Council Minutes - January 14, 2003 12.1 POLICE CHIEF SELECTION UPDATE Kandis Hanson updated the Council on the Police Chief selection process. The interviews are set for February 26th, with the public invited for input and to meet and interact with the candidates, at 6:30 p.m. 13. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Correspondence: LMCD B. Westonka Public Schools news C. Newsletter: Gillespie Center D. Article: State Budget Forecast E. Notice: Charitable Gambling donations F, Report: Five year Comparison Report of Utility Billing Delinquencnes G. Letter: Mediacom H. Letter: Mound Harbor Renaissance I. Letter: Hennepin County on redevelopment and the rail J. Newsletter: Brimeyer Group K. Update: Attorney's opinion on councilmember fundraising activities L. Letter: City of Orono to the City of Long Lake on fire services M. Article: Leadership N. AMM Fax News ©. Update: Dreamwood Commons suit P. Report: Finance Department through Nov. 30 Q. Report: Fire Commission Meeting R. Report: Small Pox Vaccination S. Report: WAFTA meeting 14. ADJOURN MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 10:22 p.m. Motion carried. All voted in favor. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 7 -421 - JANUARY 28~ 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 123002SUE $99,962.55 DEC 011003SU E $3,815.84 JAN 011503SUE $1,777.39 JAN 011003SU E $7,000.00 JAN 012803SU E $150,938.55JAN 012203SUE $4,943.02 JAN TOTAL $268,437.35 -422- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page Current Period: Closing 2002 Batch Name 123002SUE .......... User Do-[[ar Amt $99,962.55 - · Payments Computer Dollar Amt $99,962.55 $0.00 In Balance Refer 123002 BRAND NETWORKING AP Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SETUP COMPUTER/PRINTERS $699.96 Invoice 15559 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $699.96 Refer 123002 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE AP Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 4TH QTR CJDN CONNECT CHARGE $630.00 Invoice PO7 MN02713003F Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $630.00 Refer 123002 CARQUESTOFNAVARRE AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SQUAD REPAIRS $173.22 Invoice N2782 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SQUAD REPAIRS $278.69 invoice N3485 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $451 91 AP Payment E 10141910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-02 COPY MAINTENANCE $340.80 )voice 31095 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $340.80 Refer 123002 CY'S UNIFORMS ' . AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms PETZ ISSUE $942.61 Invoice 13028 AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms SUSSMAN ISSUE $1,229.46 Invoice 13594 AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms PETZ ISSUE $297.37 Invoice 13596 AP Fayment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms WOCKEN ISSUE $1,185.29 Invoice 13592 AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms PETZ ISSUE $53.56 Invoice 15034 AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms PETZ ISSUE $73.40 Invoice 13028 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3,781 69 AP Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 2002 DNR FEE $828.00 Invoice 123102 PO 17651 Transaction Date 1/13/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $828.00 Refer 123002 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AP Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings 12-02 LIQUOR STORE $112.50 Invoice 20372 AP Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $412.50 ~oice 20371 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $525.00 Refer 123002 EMMONS AND OLIVIER RESOURC -423- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page 2 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA NEW CITY WELL $4,372.00 invoice 126-01-0212 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $4,372.00 Refer 123002 G & K SERVICES AP Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 09-03-02 MATS $83.96 Invoice 321655 AP Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 12-24-02 MATS $48.20 Invoice 433071 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $132.16 Refer 123002 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE AP Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR AUTO $100.00 Invoice 58083-B AP Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR AUTO $100.00 invoice 58083-B Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $200.00 Refer 123002 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY AP Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,295.50 Invoice 654549 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3,295.50 'efer 123002 HANSON, KANDIS .~' Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells REIMBURSE LONG DISTANCE $0.81 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 DSL LINE $49.95 invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $50.76 Refer 123002 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP AP Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLAENOUS SUPPLIES $750.40 Invoice 42594 PO 17647 AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HOSE,ENDS, ETC ~ $110.44 Invoice 42531 PO 17648 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $860.84 Refer 123002 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO AP Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 12-02 NETWORK SUPPORT $34.59 Invoice 22127036 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $34.59 Refer 123002 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A AP Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 12-02 BOOKING FEE $1,385.44 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,385.44 Refe~ 123002 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R AP Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 12-02 ROOM AND BOARD $730.25 Invoice 000870 -~ansaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $730.25 ) ..~efer 12302 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER AP Payment E 101-41410-322 Postage Invoice 122302 COURIER AND MISCELLAENOUS $1,648.12 -424- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:t7 AM Page 3 Current Period: Closing 2002 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,648.12 Refer 123002 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I AP Payment E 401.-46540-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $2,462.50 Invoice 010903-A AP Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE $4,571.23 Invoice 010903-B AP Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 PLANNING MISC SERVICES $325.55 Invoice 010903-C1 AP Payment G 101-22919 5214-18 Drummond,GIliczek. 12-02 5218 DRUMMOND ROAD $131.25 Invoice 010903-C2 AP Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 12-02 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $627.50 Invoice 010903-C3 AP Payment G 101-22920 2116 Commerce BethEl Chu 12-02 BETH EL GARAGE $37.50 Invoice 010903-C4 AP Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $37.50 Invoice 010903-C5 AP Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 XXXX THREE POINTS VARIANCE $18.75 invoice 010903-D1 AP Payment G 101-22916 1975 Lakeside Lane sub-#03 12-02 LAKESIDE BRENSHELL SUB-DIV $37.50 Invoice 010903~D2 '~P, Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 MOUND VISIONS $2,875.00 ~voice 123102 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $11,124.28 Refer 123002 IFP TEST SERVICES, Il,lC. AP Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs PSYCH CHRISTIANSON $350.00 invoice 122002 PO 17556 AP Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs PSYCH TRAUX $350,00 Invoice 121802 PO 17556 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $700.00 Refer 123002 ISLAND PARK SKELLY AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery GLOW PLUG $291.62 Invoice 12285 AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HEADLAMP REPAIR $45.00 invoice 12231 AP Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CHARGER $22.88 Invoice 12117 AP Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CHARGER $22.87 Invoice 12117 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint M, achinery BATTERY.CHARGER $181.57 invoice 12101 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL FILTER $25,86 invoice 12140 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery INTAKE MANIFOLD,ETC $651.21 Invoice 12178 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERY OIL FILTER $149,22 tvoice 12237 ,'P Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REAR LENS ASSY $123.08 invoice 12240 -425- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page 4 Current Period: Closing 2002 Aw ~'ayment ~- 1U'l-4Z1 lu-4u4 ~,epalrs/Maint Machinery 'ALTERNATOR $71.00 invoice 12287 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 12321 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery PUMP,HANGER ASSY $882.34 Invoice 12351 AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery GLOW PLUG $291.62 Invoice 12285 AP Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR HEADLAMP $45.00 Invoice 12231 AP Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CHARGER $22.88 Invoice 12117 AP Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CHARGER $22.87 Invoice 12117 Transaction Date 1/13/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2 874.88 Refer 123002 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC AP Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair ENGINE 24 REPAIR $230.55 Invoice 17914 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $230,55 Refer 123002 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED '? Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs FALL 2002 NEWSLETTER $1,659.58 ,nvoice 46325 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,659.58 Refer 123002 KEEPERS, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms GLOVE POUCH $21.92 Invoice 9472 AP Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms HAT $157.45 Invoice 9431 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $179.37 Refer 123002 LAKER/PIONEER NEWSPAPER AP Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising SPRING/SUMMER ADS $508.20 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising HOLIDAY ADVERTISING $961.80 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,470.00 Refer 123002 METRO FIRE AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies RESTOCKING CHARGE $576.65 Invoice 10691 AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies CREDIT RETURN -$240.09 Invoice 12172 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $336.56 Refer 123002 MINNESOTA DEPT ECONOMIC SE AP Payment E 101-42110-140 Unemployment Comp 4TH QTR BUETOW $I ,-171.29 invoice 123102 ~' Payment E 101-41310-140 Unemployment Comp 4TH QTR CHARON $190.56 l'~voice 123102 -426- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page 5 Current Period: Closing 2002 AU Fayment ~- 101-45Z00-140 Unemployment Comp 4TH QTR UNEMPLOYEMENT $75.15 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 112/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,437.00 Refer 123002 MINNESOTA, STATE WEIGHTS/ME AP Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Main[ Contract INSPECTION #305945 $400.00 Invoice' 64971-30638 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $400.00 Refer 123002 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT AP Payment E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 12-02 WAGE REPORT $1,250.00 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 12-02 DRILLS $680.00 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 222-42260-180' Fire-Drill Pay 12-02 SALARIES $4,688.50 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $6,618.50 Refer 123002 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA T/O AP Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Con[db 12-02 FIRE RELIEF $9,088.33 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Con[db 10-02 CORRECTED AMOUNT $57.78 ~nvoice 123102 ansaction Date 1/2112003 Due 1/2/2003' Accounts Payable 20200 Total $9,146.1.1 Refer 123002 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS AP Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Main[ Materials UPM COLD $1,104.25 Invoice 74128 AP Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Main[ Materials CONCRETE $208.32 Invoice 74554 AP Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials CONCRETE $1,175.69 Invoice 74009 AP Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Main[ Materials BLACKTOP $136.38 Invoice 74127 AP Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Main[ Materials BLACKTOP $273.86 Invoice 74323 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2,898.50 Refer 123002 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO AP Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 12-02 LOCATES $58.90 Invoice 2120536 AP Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 12-02 LOCATES $58.90 Invoice 2120536 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $117.80 Refer 123002 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC AP Payment E 609-49750-305 Medical and Dental Fees EMPLOYMENT EXAM $137.50 Invoice 999009086 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $137.50 ,fer 123~02 PETTY bASH .~ Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $6.16 Invoice 123102 -427- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page 6 Current Period: Closing 2002 I:= 1u1.-41uiu-3zz ~ostage MANAGER POSTAGE ' $13.65 A~ ~aymen[ Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 AP Payment Invoice 123102 Transaction Date E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous NAPKINS $6.36 E 101-41310-322 Postage POSTAGE $0.42 E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services SOLID WASTE TIPPING FEE $11.00 E 101-41410-200 Office Supplies BALLOTS $28.75 1/21/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $66.34 Refer 123002 RELIANT ENERGY AP Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities $257.66 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities $638.42 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities $203.61 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities $825,47 Invoice 123002 ~P Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities ~ $952.10 voice 123002 AP Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities $517.63 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities $282.34 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities $376.36 Invoice 123002 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $4 053 59 AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AIR AND OXYGEN $22.45 Invoice R-12021041 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $22.45 Refer 123002 RIDGEVIEW BUSINESS HEALTH AP Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical and Dental Fees VACINATIONS $944.00 Invoice 120902 AP Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical and Dental Fees VACCINATIONS $944.00 Invoice 120902 AP Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical and Dental Fees VACCINATIONS $246.00 Invoice 120902 Transaction Date 1/13/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2 134 O0 AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery FRONT TIRES $108.40 Invoice 1989 PO 17548 -~ansaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Tota 1 $ 0840 ~t~fer 123002 SERVICE MASTER C~I AP Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 12-02 CLEANING SERVICE $1,096.95 Invoice 13245 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-000-053-000 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-001-095-800 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-001-533-500 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-001-852-100 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-001-852-000 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-001-972-603 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-001-972-603 11-18-02 THRU 12-18-02 #543-001-972-603 -428- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page 7 Current Period: Closing 2002 AK Payr~ent ~' ~u3-~lUg-~4g L)tner (.;ontractual 5ervid 12-02 CLEANING SERVICE $39.05 Invoice 13245 AP Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 12-02 CLEANING SERVICE $39.05 invoice 13245 AP Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 12-02 CLEANING SERVICE $39.05 Invoice 13245 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,214.10 Refer 123002 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE AP Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal REMOVE TREE $346.13 Invoice 4371 AP Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal REMOVE TREE $713.55 Invoice 4370 AP Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 4501 ISLANDVIEW REMOVE TREE $1,224.75 Invoice 4376 Transaction Date 1/13/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2,284.43 Refer 123002 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $1,370.83 Invoice 0095819 Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 12-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $396.44 invoice 0095818 ~3nsaction Date 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,767.27 Refer 123002 SKINNER, GREG E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $14.66 AP Payment Invoice 121902 AP Payment invoice 121902 AP Payment Invoice 121902 Transaction Date E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $14.66 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms REIMBURSE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $14.66 1/14/2003 Due I/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $43.98 Refer 123002 SPUR STATION AP Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 12-02 SQUAD WASHES $199.50 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $199.50 Refer 123002 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY AP Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials CRIMP TUBES, TAPE $315.29 Invoice 7955 PO 17649 Transaction Date 1/13/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $315.29 Refer 103002 STREICHER'S AP Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA BUILD SQUAD #843 $3,593.55 Invoice 342471.1 PO 17535 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3,593.55 Refer 123002 THRIFTY WHITE DRUG STORE AP Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies PHOTO PROCESSING $14.89 ~voice 612784 .~'ansaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $14.89 Refer 123002 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY -429- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page 8 Current Period: Closing 2002 AP Paying'fit-~ -" -- ___ 'G'L'6vE'~r:' 'E~TC, - ' ........... ' ............... ' ~ ;"~:-;8,~, ~v.,+ ...... Invoice 225153 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $120.48 Refer 123002 TRUE VALUE, MOUND AP Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $45.20 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $46.20 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E $02-49450-230 Shop Materials 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $62.27 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $223.56 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $27.12 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $0.68 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $3.77 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $3.77 Invoice 123102 \P~ Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 12-31-02 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $96.58 ,.~voice 123102 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $510.15 Refer 123002 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPL y AP Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies $20.76 Invoice 370231-0 AP Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies $3.92 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies $3.92 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $3.92 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $3 92 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $3,92 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $1.31 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies $1.31 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $1.96 Invoice 370335-0 AP Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $1.98 Invoice 370335-0 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $46.92 ~fer 123002 WIDMER, INCORPORATED ,~15 Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract BREAK RAMBLER STREET $968.00 Invoice 5768 FORMATTED DISKS MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -430- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page g Current Period: Closing 2002 $968.00 Invoice 5768 Transaction Date 1/13/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,936.00 Refer 123002 XCEL ENERGY AP Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities 12-02 SERIVCES $225.01 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 101-41910-381 Electdc Utilities 12-02 #2245-301-939 $886.24 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities 12-02 #0466-607-223 $43.98 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 609-49750-381 Bectdc Utilities 12-02 ¢1914-6901-425 $836.72 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 12-02 #0217-606-329 $4,868.40 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities 12-02 #2184-407-147 $771.88 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 101-45200-381 Electdc Utilities 12-02 #0047-005-229 $403.45 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 12-02 #0864-508-832 $205.99 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 12-02 #0864-508-832 $205.99 .ivoice 123002 AP Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 12-02 #-0864-508-832 $206.00 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 602-49450-381 Electdc Utilities 12-02 #0018-802-634 $3,122.63 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 12-02 #0009-604-835 $627.79 Invoice 123002 AP Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 12-02 STREET LIGHTS $9,829.48 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 1/2/2003 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $22,233.56 -431 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:17 AM Page 10 Current Period: Closing 2002 Fund Summary 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 401 GE. NERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $1,767.27 $1,767.27 20200 Accounts Payable $44,052.90 $11,099.08 $2,462.50 $7,858.73 $37.50 $13,213.27 $4,032.04 $6,282.15 $11.00 $9,146.11 $98,195.28 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $99,962.55 $99,962.55 -432- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9;18 AM Page 1 Current Period: Closing 2002 Payment Computer Dollar Amt $3,815.84 Posted Refer 11003 MANKATO, CITY OF AP Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training RODDING/JETTING WORKSHOP KESTNER $50.00 Invoice 011003 AP Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training RODDING/JETTING WORKSHOP KIVISTO $50.00 Invoice 011003 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 0 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $100 00 AP Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training OPERATORS WORKSHOP HARDINA $240.00 Invoice 123102 AP Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training OPERATORS WORKSHOP KESTNER $240.00 Invoice 123102 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 0 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $480.00 Refer 11003 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA AP Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 952-472-0600 $1,014.34 invoice 123002 AP Payment 12-02 952-472-3093 $298.09 Invoice 123002 ~ Payment ~ 12-02 952-472-0635 $353.30 ,nvoice 123002 AP Payment 12-02 952-472-0635 $353.30 Invoice 123002 AP Payment 12-02 952-472-0635 $353.31 Invoice 123002 AP Payment 12-02 952-472-0621 $829.88 Invoice 123002 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 0 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3,202.22 Refer 11003 AT&T ....... AP Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 612-810-4029 $33.62 Invoice 123002 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Due 0 Accounts Payable 20200 Tota $33 62 E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells -433- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:18 AM Page 2 Current PeriOd: Closing 2002 Fund Summary BATCH Total $3,815.84 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 20200 Accounts Payable $2.197.52 $33.62 $353.30 $933.31 $298.09 $3,815.84 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $3,815.84 $o.oo $3,815.84 -434- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/16/03 8:17 AM Page 1 Current Period: January 2003 Batch Name 011503SUE User Dollar Amt $1,777.39 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,777.39 Refer 11503 BEST MEETINGS Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training invoice 011503 PO 17554 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 $0.00 In Balance MJOA REGISTRATION Marquette Bank Mou 10100 $195.00 Total $195.00 Refer 11503 CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE AND GO Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training MN JUVENILE OFFICERS INSTITUTE $381.50 invoice 011503 PO 17555 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $381.50 Refer 11503 FACKLER, JAMES Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MED CAL EXPENSE $553.50 invoice 010903 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $553.50 Refer 11503 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CIITES Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 02-14-03 REGISTRATION $155.00 invoice 011403 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $155.00 Refer 11503 PETTY CASH Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $29.74 invoice 011503 PO 17693 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $29.74 Refer 11503 RITTER, BONNIE Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL $412.65 Invoice 011503 Cash Payment E 101-41310-305 Medical and Dental Fees 2003 EYE EXAM $50.00 Invoice 011503 Transaction Date 1/9/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $462.65 Fund Summary 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 101 GENERAL FUND $1,747.65 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $29.74 $1,777.39 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $1,777.39 $1,777.39 -435- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/10/03 1:05 PM Page 1 Current Period: January 2003 Batch Name 011103SUE User Dollar Amt $7,000.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $7,000.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 11103 CASH Cash Payment E 401-46580.500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA FURNITURE-PRUDENTIAL SALE $7,000.00 Invoice 011093 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $7,000.00 Fund Summary 10100 Marquette Bank Mound 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Pre-Written Check $0.00 ] Checks to be Generated by the Compute $?,000.00 Total $7,000.00 -436- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24103 9;16 AM Page Current Period: January 2003 Batch Name 012803SUE User Dollar Ami $150,938.55 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $150,938.55 $0.00 In Balance Refer 12803 APACHE GROUP Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services TOILET TISSUE $1,034.86 Invoice 64684 PO 17643 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,034-.86 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $42.16 Invoice DC302211 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $33.32 Invoice DC301405 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $152.92 Invoice DC300812 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $228.40 Refer 12803 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,685.35 Invoice 25509400 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,030.50 Invoice 25461800 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLAENOUS $77.09 Invoice 36568200 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS $9.20 Invoice 36568100 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,802.14 Refer 12803 CARGIL SALTDIWSION Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials SALT $1,891.55 Invoice 632457 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,891.55 Refer 12803 CHIEFS OF POLICE INTERNA TION Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP MCKINLEY $100.00 Invoice 1597488 PO 17564 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 2003 SUBSCRIPTION $91,00 Invoice 1597488 PO 17567 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $191.00 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMERSHIP MCKINLEY $75.00 Invoice 010103 PO 17562 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $75.00 Refer 12803 CLARK PRODUCTS, INCORPORAT .................. ......... Cash Payment E 101-41110-331 Use of personal auto PAPER CUPS $64.51 Invoice V446862 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.51 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $189.4.0 Invoice 61346206 -437- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:16 AM Page 2 Current Period: January 2003 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.40 Refer 18203 CONCO, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $530.23 Invoice 022803 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest INTEREST TRUE VALUE $431.61 Invoice 022803 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $961.84 R~efer 1~803 ~ORNER HOusE Cash Payment E 101-42110-440 Other Contractual Servic 2003 CONTRACT $1,513.07 Invoice 967 PO 17568 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 513 07 Refer 12803 CRIME PREVENTION MINNESOTA Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP SWANSON $40.00 Invoice 26903 PO 17561 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $40.00 Refer 12803 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $689.90 Invoice 205802 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $33.80 Invoice 205810 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $687.70 invoice 205052 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,411.40 Refer 12803 E-Z RECYCLING Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-03 CURBSIDE RECYCLING Invoice 4658 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12803 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 349931 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 349397 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 348744 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 347108 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 346606 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 346100 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 344856 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,135.60 Refer 12803 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DIVI Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training MARCH 4-6 CONFERENCE $150.00 Invoice 012803 PO 17566 $8,075.25 Total $8,075.25 $578.30 $5,687,20 $145.00 $742.15 $847.95 $87.00 $48,00 -438- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:10 AM Page 3 Current Period: January 2003 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00 invoice 97723 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00 Invoice 100393 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64 00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $O,00 Invoice 012803 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~ $0.00 Refer12803 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 01-07-03 UNIFORMS $30.42 invoice 447078 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 01-07-03 UNIFORMS $30.42 Invoice 447078 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 01-07-03 UNIFORMS $30.43 Invoice 447078 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 01-07-03 MATS $17.09 ~nvoice 447078 ash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 01-07-03 MATS $17.09 Invoice 447078 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 01-07-03 MATS $17.09 Invoice 447078 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 01-21-03 MATS $44.41 Invoice 461088 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 01-21-03 MATS $13.96 Invoice 461087 Cash Payment 01-21-03 MATS $84.34 Invoice 461089 Cash Payment 01-21-03 MATS $27.67 Invoice 461086 Cash Payment 01-14-03 UNIFORMS $30.42 Invoice 454079 Cash Payment 01-14-03 UNIFORMS $30.42 Invoice 454079 Cash Payment 01-14-03 UNIFORMS $30.43 Invoice 454079 Cash Payment 01-14-03 MATS $15.41 Invoice 454079 Cash Payment 01-14-03 MATS $t5,41 Invoice 454079 Cash Payment 01-14-03 MATS $15.41 Invoice 454079 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total r-- ................... ~ .................. . .~ .... ,~ $450.44 ~.fer 12803 GILLESPIE CENTER ...................... ' Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous DINNER TICKET $25.00 Invoice 011003 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services E 609.49750-460 Janitorial Services E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials -439- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:16 AM Page 4 Current Period: January 2003 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.00 Refer 12803 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $311.92 Invoice 659474 Cash Payment WINE $418.28 Invoice 659473 Cash Payment WINE $0.00 Invoice 659177 Cash Payment WINE $672.32 Invoice 656341 Cash Payment LIQUOR $1,185,56 Invoice 656340 Cash Payment WINE $579.40 Invoice 656339 Cash Payment WINE $119,60 Invoice 656338 Cash Payment LIQUOR $2,447.42 Invoice 656217 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,734.50 Refer 12803 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED ash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID $1,317.48 i , ,.nvo~ce 495224 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,317.48 Refer 12803 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Re;air REPAIR BOBCAT $644.23 Invoice 011603 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $644.23 Cash Payment E 101-43100-202 Duplicating and copying 01-23-03 THRU 04-12-03 COPIER $33.10 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale MAINTENANCE 01-23-03 THRU 04-12-03 COPIER MAINTENANCE 01-23-03 THRU 04-12-03 COPIER MAINTENANCE Wells Fargo 10100 $33.10 $33,10 Total $99,30 Invoice 23574957 Cash Payment E 601-49400-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 23574957 Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 23574957 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Refer 12803 ISLAND PARK SKELL Y Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE WORK $141.08 Invoice 12315 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE WORK $141.08 Invoice 12315 Transaction Date 1/13/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .............................................. , ~ ............ $282.16 ,~sh Payment R 101-32230 Plumbing Connection Permit REFUND PLUBMING PERMIT $55.00 Invoice 5701 -440- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:16 AM Page 5 Current Period: January 2003 Cash Payment G 101-20000 Due to Other Governments REFUND PLUBMiNG PERMIT $0.50 invoice 5701 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $55.50 Refer 12803 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $294.62 Invoice 1510550 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,659.15 Invoice 1510549 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $0.00 Invoice 1507681 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,515.33 Invoice 1507680 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $569.40 invoice 1507679 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $89.75 invoice 1507678 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,128.25 Rocor 128~)3 jOHNsoN, PH~f~_Li~ Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 02-02 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $279.26 Invoice 022803 'ash~ Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond interest 02-02 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $389.85 .nvoice 022803 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $669.11 Refer 12803 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publish~ng 2003 BUDGET DATA $81.59 Invoice 1887 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~ ......... ~ ............ $81.59 Refer 12803 LA WSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 RepaidMaint Supply LANTERN BATTERY $80.11 Invoice 0468857 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 10100 Total ~gn11wells Fargo Refer 12803 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies SAFETY CHAIN,ETC $617.69 Invoice 042672 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies QUICK-CUT $1,001.09 Invoice 042773 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,618.78 Re;er i28o3 MAPL Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies 01-14-03 RANGE RENTAL $300.00 Invoice 8136 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer 12803 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale - LIQUOR $52.00 ;~oice 500922 ~ash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,514.90 invoice 500922 -441 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:16 AM Page 6 Current Period: January 2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,528.80 Invoice 498809 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,381.84 Invoice 496648 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,477.54 Refer 12803 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 01-03-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $17.60 Invoice 12314 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 01-03-03 DELIVERY $6.30 invoice 12308 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 01-09-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $116.70 Invoice 12335 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 01-13-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $20.00 Invoice 12348 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $160.60 Refer 12803 MASYS CORPORATION Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2003 MAINTENANCE/SUPPORT $8,546.63 invoice 9914 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,546.63 Refer 12803 MA TRX MEDICAL ~sh Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies WHEEL FOR OXYGEN REGULATOR $744.40 Invoice 801706 PO 17546 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $744.40 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DJsposaI-MCIS 02-03 WASTEWATER $54,370.33 Invoice 0000749597 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54,370.33 Refer 12803 METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY MA Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP MCKINLEY $30.00 invoice 010103 PO 17563 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .............................................................................. $30.00 Refer 12803 MINNESOTA BUILDING PERMIT TE Cash Payment E 101-42400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES $15.00 Invoice 012803 PO 17458 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 12803 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN, INCO Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP $195.00 Invoice 010103 PO 17560 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $195.00 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/MaJnt Supply CLAMPS $818.67 Invoice 17286 "ansaction, Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $818 67 ,~'efer 12803 NORTHERN TOOL AND £QUIPMEN Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Malnt Supply DEWALT DRILL $14Z03 Invoice 822332280 -442- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:16 AM Page 7 Current Period: January 2003 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.03 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply COUPLING WITH BUSHING $90.23 Invoice 3153359 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total . ~ $90.23 Refer 12803 OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CHURCH Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 2003 ADVERTISING $250.00 Invoice 010803 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 12803 PAUSTIS AND SONS WIN~ COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,083.42 Invoice 0208147-1N Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,083,42 Cash Payment E 401-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA REIMBURSE FURNITURE EXPENSE $140.00 Invoice 011703 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $82.81 ivoice 37543716 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $82 81 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $355.00 Invoice 912791 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.O0 Invoice 912790 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,912.80 Invoice 910726 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $186.25 Invoice 910725 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,454.05 Refer 12803 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $15.25 Invoice 8692 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $980.71 Invoice 8691 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $759.84 Invoice 8224 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $647.91 Invoice 7748 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $2 403.71 ~ash~ . Payment E 101-42110.433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP HAWKS $30.O0 ~vome 9012803 PO 17569 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP DEBORD $30.00 Invoice 9012803 PO 17569 -443- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:16 AM Page 8 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.00 Refer 12803 PROTECTION ONE Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-16-03 THRU 04-15-03 FIRE ALARM $47,60 MAINTENANCE Invoice 010503 Cash Payment Invoice 010503 Cash Payment Invoice 010503 Cash Payment Invoice 011403 Transaction Date E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 01-16-03 THRU 04-15-03 FIRE ALARM MAINTENANCE $47.60 E602-49450-440OtherContractualSe~ic 01-16-03THRU 04-15-03FIRE ALARM MAINTENANCE $47.60 E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servlc 02-01-03 THRU 04-30-03 FIRE MAINTENANCE $142.80 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $285.60 Refer12803 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $896.14 Invoice 215784-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS $142.46 Invoice 215958-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $840.33 Invoice 213336-00 ash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,836.13 invoice 213221-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $104.68 Invoice 213220-00 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,819.74 Refer 12803 SIMONEAU, MATTHEW W. Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms COAT $169.99 Invoice 012803 Transaction Date 1/2312003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $169.99 Refer 12803 STREICHER'S Cash Payment G 101-20200 Accounts Payable HANDCUFFS,ETC $268.86 Invoice 342830.1 PO 17558 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $268.86 Refer 12803 STS CONSULTANTS Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 01-03 MAXWELL PROPERTY $10,700.00 Invoice 239781 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,700.00 Refer 12803 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRES $189.52 Invoice 1009002 PO 17644 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.52 Refer 12803 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale -BEER $3,398.80 ~voice 286271 ~ash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $63.70 Invoice 286270 -444- CtT¥ OF MOUND Payments 01124103 9:16 AM Page 9 Current Period: January 2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,468.30 Invoice 285638 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,134.15 Invoice 285042 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $25.70 Invoice 285041 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $280.00 Invoice 244913 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,370.65 Refer 12803 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING Cash Payment E 101-43100-232 Landscape Material TIMBERS $152.49 Invoice 0134755 Transaction Date 1/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $152.49 Refer 12803 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply COMPRESSED GASES. $105.00 Invoice 714729-00 PO 17646 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.00 Refer 12803 TRAINING OF OFFICERS, ASSOCI Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP MCKLINLEY $25.00 ~nvoice 010103 . PO 17565 ~sh Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP TRAUX $25.00 Invoice 010103 PO 17565 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP BURKE $25.00 Invoice 010103 PO 17565 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 MEMBERSHIP NICCUM $24.00 Invoice 010103 PO 17565 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer 12803 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies CARTRIDGE $106.46 Invoice 370363-0 PO 17551 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies STAPLER $12.77 Invoice 370366-0 PO 17551 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $106.46 Invoice 370363-0 PO 17551 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies STAPLERL $12.77 Invoice 370366-0 PO 17551 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies SELF-INKING STAMP $30.28 Invoice 371072-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $96.35 Invoice 371406-0 PO 17638 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies MARKERS $34.86 Invoice 372019-0 PO 17627 Transaction Date 1/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $399.95 Refer 12803 US FOOD SERVICE ~sh Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE GLASSES $217.26 .,~voice 572871 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE GLASSES $796.62 Invoice 565504 -445- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:16 AM Page 10 Current Period: January 2003 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 013.88 Refe; i2803 W/~/E Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $96S.45 Invoice 093666 Transaction Date 1/24/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $96B 45 Refer 12803 ZEE MEDI~".A; Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies MEDICAL SUPPLIES $18.53 Invoice 54082326 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .... $18.53 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $28,052.25 $1,794.40 $140.00 $1,630,95 $2,731.02 $54,685,47 $53,829.21 $8,075.25 $150,938.55 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $15O,938.55 $150,938.55 -446- CITY OF MOUND Payments 01/24/03 9:20 AM Page 1 Current Period: January 2003 Batch Name 01ZZ03SUE Payment Computer Dollar Amt $4,943,02 Posted Refer 12203 BALBOA CENTER LIMITED PARTN Ck#010117 1/23/2002 Cash Payment E 496-46580-412 Building Rentals 02-03 RENTAL SPACE $4,357.75 Invoice 011603 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,357.75 Refer 12203 ROBERTS, COLLETTE Ck#010119 1/23/2002 Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents REFUND DEPENDENT CARE $512.00 Invoice 012203 Transaction Date 1/21/2003 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $512.00 Refer 12203 PETTY CASH Ck# 010118 1/23/2002 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $73.27 Invoice 011403 PO 17559 Transaction Date 1/23/2003 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $73.27 Fund Summary BATCH Total $4,943.02 101 GENERAL FUND 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 10100 Wells Fargo $585,27 $4,357,75 $4,943.02 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $4,943.02 $o.oo $4,943.02 -447- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE OPERATIONS PERMIT FOR MEDIACOM CABLE COMPANY (FORMERLY TRIAX TELECOMMUNICATION) TO ALLOW EXTERIOR STORAGE AT 5308 SHORELINE DRIVE (BALBOA BUILDING) WHEREAS, Operations Permits are required by City Code for new businesses operating within the Balboa Building which is a Planned Industrial Area (PIA), approved by Resolution No. 85-87 and amended by Resolution No. 87-145 and Resolution No. 87- 205; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Mediacom Cable Company (formerly Triax Telecommunications), was issued an Operations Permit pursuant to City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 6(B)(2) on December 8, 1998 to allow office and warehouse space in the Balboa Business Center; and WHEREAS, the City's approval of the Operations Permit for Mediacom is outlined in Resolution No. 98-133; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a 45' x 60' fence enclosure in the northeast comer of the parking lot located behind the Balboa building for the purpose of screening cable equipment and supplies; and WHEREAS, exterior storage is allowed only upon approval of an Operations Permit as stated in Resolution No. 85-87, Resolution No. 87-145 and Resolution No. 87- 205; and WHEREAS, the proposed fence enclosure will screen the existing cable equipment and supplies that are currently stored outside from adjacent properties; and WHEREAS, adequate parking is available on the property for the use(s) contained within the Balboa building; and -448- WHEREAS, the proposed fence enclosure is consistent with the criteria for granting Operations Permits as set forth in City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 8. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve an Operations Permit Amendment for Mediacom Cable Company to allow construction of a 45'x 60' fenced enclosure to screen cable equipment and supplies that are currently being stored outside. Approval is conditioned on compliance with all building and fire codes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 28, 2003 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -449- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Operations Permit Amendment APPLICANT: Mediacom Cable Company LOCATION: 5308 Shoreline Boulevard ZONING: I-1 Industrial PIA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial SUMMARY Mediacom is requesting an amendment to its Operations Permit pursuant to City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 6. to allow installation of a 45' x 60' fenced exterior storage area in the northeast comer of the parking lot behind the Balboa Business Building located at 5300 Shoreline Boulevard. The purpose for the proposed fence enclosure is to screen and secure equipment and supplies which are currently stored on the subject site. Members of the City Council are advised that an Operations Permit was issued to Mediacom (formerly Triax) in December 1998 to permit office and warehouse use in the Balboa building. A copy of Resolution No. 98-133 has been included as an attachment. The proposed fence enclosure would be constructed of (6) foot chain link fence with privacy slats. Operations Permits are required by the Mound City Code for businesses operating within the Balboa Business Center which was previously established as a Planned Industrial Area (PIA) as approved by Resolution No. 85-87, Resolution No. 87-145, and Resolution No. 87~205. Pursuant to the PIA for the subject property, outside storage is prohibited on the subject property except by Operations Permit. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 7 B states that approval of a PIA Operations Permit shall be by the City Council following a recommendation by City staff. Members of the City Council are advised that Operations Permits do not require review by the Planning Commission nor is a public heating required. However, at its discretion, the City Council may elect to call a public hearing to solicit public inpUt on an Operations Permit in the-event there are relevant concerns (ie. emissions, access, parking, noise, etc.) The crite.ria for granting Operations Permit are the same the criteria as listed in City Code Section 350:525, Subd. 1 A-L for conditional use permits. -450- CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Acting Police Chief McKinley No police issues. Public Works Director Skinner There are no municipal utilities in this area. Fire Chief Pederson No fire issues. City Engineer Cameron No engineering issues. Parks Director Fackler No park issues. City Planner Gordon An amendment to the original Balboa Business Center CUP is not required. Exterior storage is allowed by Operations Permit only. The Operations Permit process is similar to the CUP process as it assumes the use is acceptable with conditions that may be imposed by the City Council. Building Official Simoneau The use of cedar or other acceptable material is recommended. Comm. Dev. Dir. Smith A fence permit is required. Applicant has an fence application on file. Fence requirements in the Industrial District allow a fence up to six (6) feet in height. The proposed fenced area will screen the existing equipment and supplies (ie. cable, etc.) from adjacent properties. The fenced storage area may result in the loss of a number of parking stalls however based upon a site visit by City staff there appears to be ample parking for the use(s) within the Balboa building. -451 - The use of an opaque fence (ie. wood) as opposed to a chain-line is preferred. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of an amendment to the Operations Permit for Mediacom to allow construction of an outside fenced area in the northeast comer of the parking lot. -452- 01/23/03 10:02 FAX 612 472 4130 MOUND WAREHOUSE ~02 12/24/~0D2 10:3~ FA.~ 952472D6Z0 CITY UF'~0[.I1N*D ~003 RATIONS .PERMIT APPLICATION CiTY OF I~OUNO. 53~1-MAYWOOD ROAD, MOUND. MN 55364 I L~~. '472-0607,, FAX: 952-472-0620 City Council Date: ~ Operations Permit Fee: City Planner: ~ .--- Building Official: CiW Manag~; Uses..J3v .Ooer~.ti~nspemlit; W-~hin any Planned 'Industrial Area. no structure or land shall be used for ~ uses listed within the Zoning Ordinance, iSec±ion 350:680, Subd. 6. (attached), except b_.¥ opera~ _o~s.perm[t. ~rlteria for arar~ ,oper ~ation permits is the same as listed in Zoning urcrfrmnce 5action 350.525, Subd. ;1, A - L' (attached); Att ~. p~ must be approved bY the ,City Council. Applications must be received two weeks prt~r to the City Council meeting to allow time for staff review. The City Council meets on th~ second end fourth Tuesday Of each monl~h. The City Council meetings are held at City Hall in the CouncE Chambers. and commence al~ 7:30 p,m. The applicant or a representative is encouraged to be present at the meeting. Section I - Appian,InformationI Street Add, ess of Propa~/ ~.~3~ ~.~_/_~w~ ~)~ Legal Desc_dption of Property Lot ~7~ / ~ 1/ Black Phone _ Phone ,,, ~5".~ ' ~Z'?z -,,_.~,~ ¢ / Office Area _ Warehouse Area 7. R"~? .. Other (please specify) · ' " -453- .." 01/23/03 10:02 FAX 612 472 4130 MOUND WAREHOUSE ~03 12/24/2002 IO:&D FA[ 9524720620 CIT~ OF,MOT.~D 004 /~sc~ibe Nature of Business ~'~f-~-- ~-'V/ ~~.~,~ f_. Wholesale Retail Location (cite unit number or a~ach floor plan) Number of Employees:.1 a shift _. ~ 3r~ shift 2nd shift: _~.~ent Uses {list businesses) Section 3- Bueiness Operations Describe P~duc~ts pro~duoed o,r services offered ~attach product brochures if available) k~J~T~e.4p~ /~_J~e£¥~_;~Z ~_ /~_~a~j. ~,~z_ .~/~f~ ,~hOat Wp. es of materials will be shipped in~o and/or stored within the premises ? Materials be shipped by: raiJ ~-' Semi ~uck ~her (sp~i~) S~,~ ~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~5 Will delivery vehicles ~ stored on the pmpe~y? Yes _ ~ No Does t~usiness plan future expansions at this iocation~ Yes No .. v , tf yes, describe amount of anticipated expansion ~nd ' -- timid, Will the business require any modifications za the exterior of the existing building including but not I~,~ted to doors, windows, overhead doors, coo~ing towers, HVAC units, etc? Yes No If yes, please de-scribe and attach a flo(;r~olnn and ex'terior building elevation drawings. ~= T-=*~;~'C~._~Z-o~.,Z, ~J~-~.~3 /~_~4 ~ ~J~=~4,, Will'the proposed operation involve: Noise Generation; Yes If yes, describe source and amount No v// -454- 01/23/03 10:02 FA~ 612 472 4130 MOUND WAREHOUSE ~04 12/24/2002 10:40 FAX 0524720620 CITY OF ~OUND 005 amount · If yes, describe sou rca and Toxic and/or Hazardous Waste Generation; Yes If yes, describe source and amount 'l~rovide a detailed list[nO of ell chemicals which will be dlscharged )r~to tho sanitary sewer system, Will the operations include either interior or exterior storage of bulk chemicals? Yes No ~ . If yes, attach floor plan and/or site plan showing location and describe spill/leal~age containment provisions. 9. Other t~n chemicals, will the operation require outdoor storage of _env materials? Yes v- No , If yes, describe materials and a~tach site plan showing locations and identifying proposed screening by type and location. Section 4- Certification I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers and plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate, I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be require?/~.w._..~/ / Section 5 - City Review and Action City Engineer Fire Chief City Manager ~ Other [0:40 FAX 8524720620 Cz'ry OF ~OUND -455- ~ o0B UNITED PROPERTIES March 28, 2002 Bob Messano Mediacom LLC 5308 Shoreline Drive Mound, MN 55364 RE: Outdoor Storage - Balboa Business Center Dear Bob: I'm writing as a follow-up to our meeting at Balboa Business Center on March 26, 2002, Per our discussion, the landlord will approve an outdoor storage area with approximate dimensions of 50 ft by 60 ft. This storage area will be located just west of the abandoned water tower on the north side of Balboa's property and shall not include any asphalt areas. MediaCom must attain all permits and all costs associated with the project will be those of MediaCom. Prior to construction, the landlord requests the following: 1. Copies of permit(s) 2. Approval (bY landlord) of fencing materials to be used 3. Certificate of insurance from any construction companies to be used As requested, a copy of MediaCom's lease has been included. Sincerely, Property Manager Phone: 952-893-8226 Email: zeliason@uproperties.com 3500 West 80th Street, Minneapotis, MN55431 · 952.831.1000 · fax 952.820.8750 · www. uproperties.com -456- 09:46 FAX' 65146-17377 CE~NTI.,"R¥ FENCE CO, ~001 (ENT FEI E C;,CalVII~A~'~Y 14839 lAKE OR., P.O. BOX 21'7 FOREST tAKE, MN {6~1) 4641373 NATIONWIDE ($00) FAX (65~) MEDIA COM 53~ BHOI~F_.UNE DR. MOUND, MN. &HI~ TO: A'I-I'N: BOB , . ......... - ? ........ .......:::,:....-...-...;.;.:.:.:,:..........._,.....,.,..,. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: FENCE STYLE PALISADE HEIGHT ~ LiNE SPACe3 8' SET DRIVEN SELVAGE BK COATING GALV. GATE FRAME TOP RNL C ~DDLE BOTTOM C11 2" FURNISH AND INSTALL: #1- 60 LF, OF 2 EA. - 3" END POSTS TOTAL - $ #2- 80 LF. OF 8' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH PLASTIC PRIVACY SLATS 2 EA. - 3" END PO~T8 t EA. - 3" CORNER POST TO't'AL - $ 2,'la'~.00 194 LF. OF J~'TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 60 LF. TO P~AVI~ PLASTIC PRIVACY SLATS 1 EA. - 1(5' x ~' TALL DOUBLE SWING GATES , 2 EA_ -4- GATE POSTS 4 F_A. - 3" CORNER POSTS :NOTE: We reserve the right to revise this quo~tion if not eooe~d w~thin ~O,da~. I**A signed prop~al is required to begin work on thlm project.** -457- 09:47 FAX 6514647377 CENTI~Y FENCE CO. ~002 -458- 09:47 FAX 8511847377 CENTURY FENCE, ~0~ [~1004 COMPANY "ADVANTAGE" THE CHOICE FOR A.LL CltA I N L INK RPPL I CATi ONS ATTRACTIVE LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS! A DRAMATIC CHANG1: FROM YOUR CHAIN LINK F£NCg TO AN ATTRACTIVE PRIVATE I:NVIRONMENT. "ADVA,'.TAGI:" ViP ADDLED TO YOUR NEW OR EXi~;T%NG C~N t. INK FENCE DELIVERS MAXIMtJM BI~AUTY, PRIVACY AND SFCLIRITY. HIGH DENSf~FY POLYETHYLENE IS AN A~TRAC~IVIE VERSATILE DECORATOR MATERIAL FOR BOTH HOME AND 1NDU$1'R¥. TEAL -459- I I I I I I I I I / Dec'ember 8~ ~g98 RESOLUTION//98-133 RF_~OLUTION TO OPERATIONS PERMIT TELECOMMUNICATIONS AT 5308 SHORELINE DRIVE (BALBOA BUILDING) WHEREAS, Triax Telecommunications will maintain an office and warehouse area of 8,131 square feet for warehousing of parts used for cable television installation, and; WHEREAS, the warehouse will have one full time employee that will oversee the daily operations during the business hours of 7 a.m. to 4 p..m. Monday'through .,. Friday. The business operations necessitate coordination with cable installation contractors who will be on site as needed to schedule projects, and; WHEREAS, cable television equipment that will be stored on site include the following materials: cable and fiber-optic wire, connectors, splitters, grounding wire, galvanized stakes, cable boxes made of metal and plastic, car type batteries, and other hardware used for cable installation. Most of this equipment will be stored on wood pallets with cable wire wound on large wooden spools, and; WHEREAS, Triax anticipates three deliveries and three shipments per day during normal business hours by semi-trailer and smaller delivery trucks, and; WHEREAS, WarehouSing is permitted in the PIA district as stated in Section 350:680 Subd. 6(B)(2), and; WHEREAS, adequate parking is available for employee use within the .property and; -461- December 8, 1998 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve an Operations Permit for Triax Telecommunications for an occupancy of approximately 8,131 square feet within the Balboa Building, providing that the nature of the business and products stored on the premises remains essentially unchanged. Approval is conditioned on compliance with all building and fire codes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councihnember gJensen, and seconded by Councilmember Ahrens. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Ahrens,Hanus, Jensen, Polston and Weycker. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Attest: City Clerk '~/2 -462- MOUND CITY CODE SECTION 350:680 Section 350:680. Planned Industrial Area (PI~%). 8~bd. 1. Purpose (PIA). The purpose of the Planned Industrial Area (PIA) is to facilitate the conversion and division of industrial structures into two or more separate uses in order to promote economical and efficient land use, expand employment opportunities, improve levels of amenities and/or encourage creative design. Sub4. 2. Conditional Use Permit (PIA). The owner or owners of any tract or tracts of land in the Light Industrial (I-1) district may submit to the City Council for approval, a plan for the use and development of such a tract of land as Planned Industrial Area (PIA) by making application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizing completion of the project according to the plan. S~bd. 3. Subdivision (PIA). Industrial buildings may be ---~~-id~d-~i~t~-q~ or more uni~-~h-d~ a ~o-6~-d~lnlum ~-or other appropriate technique providing that the parking requirements and other applicable standards in the Mound Zoning Code and conditional use permit are met. Ail condominium plats or subdivisions of any nature shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council prior to filing with the county. Ail plats shall be consistent with the development plan as included in the conditional use permit. Subd. 4. Conditional use P~it - Procedure (PIA). Conditional Use Permit Review/IssUance. The conditional use permit reView shall include an application for conditional use permit subject to the requirements of 350:525. Additionally, the site plan (master development plan) shall include the following: A® Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of owners, developers, and designers; name of development, date, north point and soale. Sufficient information on adjacent properties to indicate relationships to the proposed development, including such information as land divisions, land use, pedestrian and vehicular circulation, significant natural features or physical improvements and drainage pattern. Ce Existing site conditions including contours at intervals sufficient to indicate topographic conditions (generally two feet). 72 3/15/93 -463- MOUND CITY CODE SECTION 350~680, SUBD. 4. D. De Treatment of transitional zones around the perimeter of the project for protection of adjoining properties, including setbacks and buffer areas, landscaping, fences or other screening, height limitation or other provisions. A narrative or graphic explanation of the planning and design concepts and objectives the owner intends to follow in implementing the proposed development, including a description of the character of the proposed development; the rationale behind the assumptions and choices made; the compatibility with the surrounding areas; and design considerations for architecture, engineering, landscaping, open space, etc. A statement of intent with regard to selling or leasing all or portions of the proposed development. Proposed phasing timetable· Subd. $. Permitted Uses CPIAI. Within any Planned Industrial Area, no structure or land shall be Used except for one or more of the following. The numbers on parenthesis refer to the Standard Industrial ClassifiCation Manual, 1987 edition. B. C. D. Public buildings. Public and private utility uses. Refrigerated warehousing (4222). Household goods warehoUsing and storage (4214). S~b4. 6. Uses by OD-rations Permit (PIA). Within any Planned Industrial Area', no Structure or land shall be used for the following except by operations permit. The numbers in parenthesis refer to the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 edition.. ae Manufacturing of: Food and kindred products (20) excluding (2011)-(2017), (2044) , (2046), (2062), (2063) and (2074)-(2079). Textile milled products (22). Apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and other similar materials (23). Millwork (2431). Wood kitchen cabinets (2343)· 73 -464- 3/15/93 MOUND CITY CODE SECTION 350:680, SUBD. 6. A. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Furniture and fixtures (25). Paper and allied products (26) excluding (2611)-(2631) and (2661). Printing, publishing and allied industries (27) . Leather and leather produc ts ( 31) excluding (3111). Stone, clay, glass and concrete products (32) excluding (3251), (3255), (3259), (3271)-(3281) and (3292). Cold rolled steel sheet, strip and bars (3316). Steel pipe and tubes (3317). Fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment (34) excluding (3448) and (3471)-(3489). 14. Machinery, except electrical (35) excluding (3519), (3523), (3531)-(353~3_~, 15. Electrical and electronic machinery, equipment and supplies (36) excluding (3612), (3624), (3672) and (3691)-(3693). 16. Measuring, analyzing and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goals; watches and clocks (38). 17. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (39). B® Transportation, Communication and Other Public Utilities Including: Local and suburban transi~ and interurban highway passenger transportation (41). General warehousing and storage (4225). Wholesale Including: Durable goods (50) excluding (5012), (5031), (5039), (5051), (5052), (5082), (5083) and (5093). Nondurable goods (51) excluding (5154)- (5172). Retail Trade Including: 3. 4. 5. Building materials, hardware, supply, and mobile home dealers excluding (5271). General merchandise stores (53). Food stores (54). Auto and home supply stores (5531). Apparel and accessory shops (56). garden (52) 74 3/15/93 -465- MOUND CITY CODE SECTION 350=680, SUBD. 6. D. 6. e Furniture, home furnishings and equipment stores (57). Eating and drinking places (58). Miscellaneous retail (59) excluding (5983) and Finance Insurance and Real Estate Including: Credit agencies other than banks (61). Security and commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges and services (62). Insurance agents, brokers and serv: · Real estate (65). 7. Combinations of real estate, insurance, loans and law offices (66). ~.~ ..... ~o__ldi__ng and oth_e_r__in¥~s~ken~ ~omDanies (67). Services Including: 8. 9. 10. 11. Personal services (72). Business services (73). Automotive repair, service and garages (75) including boats and watercraft. Miscellaneous repair services (76). Motion pictures (78) Amusement and recreation services except motion pictures (79) excluding (7948), (7992) and (7996). Health services (80). Legal services (81). Social services (83). Nonprofit membership organizations (86)· Miscellaneous services (89). Stlbd. 7. ODerations.Permit - Procedure (PIA). Applications for operations permits accompanied by the fee as established by the City Council shall be filed with the Building Official· After approval of the Operations Permit, the applicant, owner or developer, before commencing a~':Work or obtaining an~ ~uilding permits, may be required to make a minimum cash deposit of $250. The Council may establish an amount above the minimum deposit at the time the permit is approved and this deposit shall be held in a special Developer's Escrow Account to cover administrative and legal expenses incurred by the City of Mound. 75 -466- HOUND CZT~ COD~ SECTION 350~680, SUBD. 7. B. Approval of a planned industrial area operations Permit shall be by the City Council after recommendation by the City Staff. Ce At the option of the City Council, the City may elect to call a public hearing to solicit public input on an opeFations permit application. A hearing may be called to review concerns regarding the use or discharge of toxic substances, emissions, special access, parking or loading requirements, noise, storage or other relevant factors. Subd. 8. Criteria for Grantinq Operations Permits CPIAI. The criteria for granting operation permits shall be the sa~e as the criteria listed in Section 350=525, Subd. 1, A - L for the issuance of conditional use permits. -467- HOUND CZT¥ CODE SEGTZO~ 3S0~52S Seot:Lon 350z52S. Conditional Us® Permits. 8ubd. 1. Criteria for Grantina Conditional Use Permits. Ao Be That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. That. the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. C. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are : beln~_.pro~tded~ That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust,, noise and. vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted~s~gn~_and..other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. Fo The use, in the opinion of the City council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. Ge He The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. To Ko The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. Existing adjacent uses will not be adversely affected because of curtailment of customer trade brought about by intrusion of noise, glare or'general unsightliness. The developer shall submit a time schedule for completion of the project. The developer shall provide proof of ownership of the property to the Zoning Officer. -468-. 130 August 13, 1985 RESOLUTION NO. 85-87 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO BALBOA MINNESOTA COMPANY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED INDUSTRIAL AREA - 5340 SHORELINE BLYD. ADDING ITEM J. AND K. AS RECOMMENDED WHEREAS, Balboa Minnesota Company (applicant) has applied for a Conditional Use Permit for the establishment of a Planned Industrial Area for the property generally known as the Tonkawest Business Center at 5340 Shoreline Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the property is presently zoned I-1 and Planned Industrial Areas are conditional uses in the I-1 zone; and WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to facilitate the full utilization of the Tonkawest BUsiness Center structure through the establishment of one or more business enterprises either on a lease or sale basis, thereby expanding employment opportunities in the City. of Mound and contributing to the improvement of the economic climate in the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has determined that the establishment of a Planned Industrial Area is a more efficient usa.ge of the existing structure and land than could be accomplished under traditional I-1 zoning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: It is hereby determined that the proposed Planned Industrial Area is consistent with the land use and economic development policies of the City and is consistent with the general purposes and interest of the Zoning Code of the City. The Conditional Use Permit is granted in accordance with the following conditions: Modification or alteration of the exterior of the building is expressly prohibited pending submittal of the comprehensive exterior remodeling plan for the entire structure by Balboa Minnesota Company or by approval of an Operations Permit for portion of the structure. b.~ In accordance with the performance standards of the Mound Zoning Code, industrial, warehouse, storage and handling of bulk goods facilities -469- August 13, 1985 are required to have at least one parking space for each employee on maximum shift or one space for each two thousand (2,000) square feet of gross floor area, whichever is larger. The redevelopment plan for Tonkawest Business Center (Exhibit 1) has identified 427 total parking spaces. As uses occupy this building, their parking requirements will be verified at the time of Building Permit or Operations Permit application. If a parking shortage occurs at any time during the development (leasing or sale) of the building, the applicant shall be responsible for providing additional parking for the use of all applicable businesses. Loading access areas (loading berths) shall be restricted to the locations shown on Exhibit 2 unless modified by the subsequent approval of an Operations Permit for a portion of the building. All loading berths shall conform to the provisions of Section 23.717 of the Mound Zoning Code. Within 90 days of approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the applicant shall prepare landscaping plans for all parking areas, entrance areas and common areas on the property. Such plans, clearly identifying species, caliper and root type shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner. Tonkawest Business Center shall be combined into one tax parcel. Balboa Minnesota Company shall prepare a comprehensive signage plan of the entire structure depicting locations of concentrations of wall signs, the general signage theme and the location and design pylon signs. Sign permits for individual business establishments shall be. withheld until such time as a comprehensive sign plan is submitted and approved. Subdivision of the Tonkawest Business Center structure in two or more units shall require review and approval by the Mound Planning Commission and City Council. Subdivisions shall be consistent with all applicable City Ordinances and at the time of subdivision application, the City Council shall make a determination of park dedication requirements. No change in the external mechanical devices -470- 132 shall be permitted 'unless author ized by Operations Permit for a portion of the building. Additionally, no roof vents or emission stacks shall be constructed without Operations Permit approval. 'Proposed improvement along the north side of the structure including but not limited to walkways and driveways between the building and the existing parking lot shall be reviewed by the Burlington Northern Railroad or subsequent owner. No outside storage is permitted except by Operations Permit. Parking of vehicles exceeding 24 hours is prohibited except delivery vehicles in designated spaces and trucks in loading berth areas. ke Balboa Minnesota Company shall submit to the City $1,000 to be put in an escrow.account to cover staff review and administration. The foregoing, resolution was moved, by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Jessen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson, Polston and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Attest: City Clerk -471 - RESOLUTION #85-87 (EXHIBIT l) 'i -472- RESOLUTION //85-87 -473- ! 198 August 11, 1987 RESOLUTION #87-145 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A REVISION TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED TO BALBOA MN. CORP, IN RESOLUTION #82-87 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS kI~EREAS, the City Council on August 11, 1987, held a public hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances to consider the amendment of item 2(j) of the Resolution 85-87 to permit the parking of trailers at 5340 Shoreline Boulevard; ar~ WHEREAS, the subject property is within the Light Industrial (I-l) zone which allows such uses; and WHEREAS, the subject 'property has been established as a Planned Industrial Area (PIA) which allows such uses by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and does recommend approval; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDby the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that Condition 2(j) of Resolution 85-87 is hereby amended to'permit the parking of trail, ers at 5340 Shoreline Boulevard. subject.to the following conditions: ... ". ' Ail existing construction debris within the area shall be removed imm.die rely. Dust-free surfacing in the trailer parking area shall be · maintained at all times. Prior to issuance of the Conditional Use Permit, Balboa MJ~_qesota shall submit a landscapin, g plan showing screening along Lynwood Boulevard for review an.d approval by the 'City Planner.. Landscaping shall be installe~ within 60 days of the date of this resolution. 4. Trailers and trucks within the parking area and on the remaining · Balboa property shall be directly involved with tenant businesses. No trailers shall be allowed to remain parked on the site for longer than 30 days. 6. The trailer storage area shall remain trash free at all times. ® ~er~ ~-14k~)~ ~.~-t~-7 ~00-a. m, Trailer locations shall be as sho%n on the site plans dated June 25, 1987. 9' · b~o outside storage is permitted except by operations permit. -474- Balboa Corporation will provide a landscaping plan which will include trees, shrubs and berming. They will also%e required to.post a Performance Bond in an amount up to $15,000. Construction of the landscaping will be done in the Spring of 1988. -475- 299 . .. November 24, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87-205 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR ~ITH-1llE STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND AI~END RESOLUTION t87~145, DELETING ITEHS t7 AI~D ADDING Il'EH t10 AS PROPOSEO .. WHEREAS, on August 11, 1987, t,he City COuncil adopted Resolution #87-145 entitled, "Resolution to Concur with the Planning Commission to Ap- prove a Revision.to the Conditional Use Permit Granted to Balboa, Mn. Corp. in Resolution #85-87 Subject to Conditions"; and ~ WHEREAS, Item' #7 of Resolution #87-145 read as follows: "No ac- tivity shall occur in the trailer parking area between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M."; and °, WHEREAS, .the Toro Corporation who uses the trailer parking..area has stated that the restriction of trailer activity between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. is a hindrance to their business operations; and WHEREAS, the Balboa MN. Corporat.ion has agreed to landscape and berm the trailer area to minimize the noise as much'as possible. ' NOW, THEREFORE~.BE IT RESOLVED that .~he City coUncil of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby amends Resolution #87-145 as follows: Item #7 which reads as follows: "No activity, shall occur in .the trailer parking area between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M." is hereby deleted. 2. Item #10 which reads as follows: "Balboa MN. Corporation will provide a landscaping plan which will include trees, shrubs and berming. They wil.l also be required to post a Performance Bond in an amount up to $15,000. Construction of the landscaping will be done in the Spring of 1988." is hereby added. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Abel and seconded by Councilmember Jessen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abe'l, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in t'he negative: none. Attest: City ~ J -476- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN OPERATIONS PERMIT FOR THE MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ALLOW INTERIM OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE USE OF THE BALBOA BUILDING LOCATED AT 5300 SHORELINE DRIVE DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING WHEREAS, Operations Permits are required by City Code for new businesses operating within the Balboa Building which is a Planned Industrial Area (PIA), approved by Resolution No. 85-87 and amended by Resolution No. 87-145 and Resolution No. 87- 205; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound, has signed a lease with United Properties to allow interim use of (663) SF of office and (9000) SF of warehouse space within the Balboa Business Center by the Mound Fire Department until the new Public Safety building is completed; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound is therefore making application for an Operations Permit pursuant to City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 6; and WHEREAS, the interim office and warehouse use by the Fire Department is consistent with the criteria for granting Operations Permits as set forth in City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 8. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve an Operations Permit for the Mound Fire Department to allow interim use of (663) SF of office and (9000) SF of warehouse space during the duration of the construction of the new Public Safety building. -477- The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 28, 2003 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -478- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Operations Permit APPLICANT: City of Mound Fire Department LOCATION: 5300 Shoreline Boulevard ZONING: I-1 Industrial PIA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial SUMMARY The City of Mound is requesting an Operations Permit pursuant to City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 6. to allow interim use of the Balboa building by the Fire Department until the construction of the new Public Safety building is completed. It is anticipated that the construction of the new Public Safety building will take approximately nine (9) months. Members of the City Council are advised that a lease between United Properties and the City of Mound for office (663 SF) and warehouse space (9000 SF) was executed in November 2002 and is on file with the City Clerk. Operations Permits are required by the Mound City Code for businesses operating within the Balboa Business Center which was previously established as a Planned Industrial Area (PIA) as approved by Resolution No. 85-87, Resolution No. 87-145, and Resolution No. 87-205. As set forth in City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 5, the following are considered to be permitted uses: B. C. D. Public buildings Public and private utility uses. Refrigerated warehousing Household good warehousing and storage. While Subparagraph A states that public buildings are permitted within the Balboa building, public use(s) are not specifically defined. Therefore, City staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss whether or not it qualifies as a permitted use or if an Operations Permit is required. -479- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Operations Permit APPLICANT: City of Mound Fire Department LOCATION: 5300 Shoreline Boulevard ZONING: I-1 Industrial PIA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial SUMMARY The City of Mound is requesting an Operations Permit pursuant to City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 6. to allow interim use of the Balboa building by the Fire Department until the construction of the new Public Safety building is completed. It is anticipated that the construction of the new Public Safety building will take approximately nine (9) months. Members of the City Council are advised that a lease between United Properties and the City of Mound for office (663 SF) and warehouse space (9000 SF) was executed in November 2002 and is on file with the City Clerk. Operations Permits are required by the Mound City Code for businesses operating within the Balboa Business Center which was previously established as a Planned Industrial Area (PIA) as approved by Resolution No. 85-87, Resolution No. 87-145, and Resolution No. 87-205. As set forth in City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 5, the following are considered to be permitted uses: B. C. D. Public buildings Public and private utility uses. Refrigerated warehousing Household good warehousing and storage. While Subparagraph A states that public buildings are permitted within the Balboa building, public use(s) are not specifically defined. Therefore, City staff recommends that the City Council review and discuss whether or not it qualifies as a permitted use or if an Operations Permit is required. -480- REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:680, Subd. 7 B states that approval of a PIA Operations Permit shall be by the City Council following a recommendation by City staff. Members of the City Council are advised that Operations Permits do not require review by the Planning Commission nor is a public hearing required, However, at its discretion, the City Council may elect to call a public hearing to solicit public input on an Operations Permit in the event there are relevant concerns (ie. emissions, access, parking, noise, etc.) The criteria for granting Operations Permit are the same the criteria as listed in City Code Section 350:525, Subd. 1 A-L for conditional use permits. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Acting Fire Chief Pederson The office space is located near the main entrance of the Balboa building and the fire trucks and equipment will be stored on the west end of the building. Parking for the firefighters can be accommodated on site. The access ramp to the fire truck parking area is under construction and will be completed soon. No exterior storage with the exception of the rescue boat which will be outside 1-2 weeks each spring and fall. City Manager Hanson The lease with United Properties allows the Fire Department to move in on Feb. 1. Subject site may used for fish fry event in June. Public Works Director Skinner No comments as of this date. Acting Police Chief Pederson No police issues. City Engineer Cameron No engineering issues. Parks Director Fackler No park issues. City Planner Gordon No comments as of this date. -481 - Building Official Simoneau A temporary building permit will be required for any interior improvement(s). Any such improvements within the building are deemed to be temporary and will need to be removed by the Fire Department within (2) weeks upon vacation of the premises. The Fire Department must also provide a barrier to contain any possible spills within the building. This barrier will also need to be removed within the designated time frame as stated above. Comm. Dev. Dir. Smith There appears to be adequate parking available on site to accommodate the interim use by the Fire Dept. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the Operations Permit for the Mound Fire Department to allow interim use of the Balboa Business Center by the Fire Department for both office use and equipment storage until the new Public Safety building is completed. -482- Operations Rev.6/01 City Council Date: OPERATIONS PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND, 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD, MOUND, MN 55364 Phone: 952-472-0607, FAX: 952-472-0620 Distribution: City Planner: ~ Building Official: City Engineer: '5~ Fire Chief: City Manager: ,~ Other: ~ Uses by Operations Permit: Within any Planned Industrial Area, no structure or land shall be used for the uses listed within the ZOning Ordinance, Section 350:680, Subd. 6. (attached), except by operations permit. Criteria for granting operation permits is the same as listed in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:525, Subd. 1, A - L (attached). All operations permits must be approved by the City Council. Applications must be received two weeks prior to the City Council meeting to allow time for staff review. The City Council meets on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. The City Council meetings are held at City Hall in the Council Chambers, and commence at 7:30 p.m. The applicant or a representative is encouraged to be present at the meeting. Section 1 - Application Information 1. Street Address of Property 2. Legal Description of Property Lot On File Addition PID Block Owner's Name UP (owner"s :rep~ Address ~sf10 w. ~th ,qtr~o,~ Phone R%1-1~0~ Applicant (if other than owner): Name c.~v ~f Mound Fire Dept. Address 5141 Maywood Blvd. Phone 472-3555 Section 2 - Business Information 1. Name of Business Mound'Volunteer Fire Dept. (temporary only) Total Floor Area ManufactUring Area Sales Floor Area 9663 Office Area 663 Warehouse Area 9000 Other (please specify) -483- Operations Rev,6/01 3. Describe Nature of Business ~_~ff~ce and traininm site for Mound Fire Dept. Fire truck / equipment.storage. Wholesale Retail 4. Location (cite unit number or attach floor plan) 0n File Number of Employees: l't shift 2"a shift 3rashift (2 Full-Time employees / 37 volunteers) 6. Adjacent Uses (list businesses) Misc. industrial / manufacturing.: in bldg. Commercial/service retail on south side of CSAH 15. Section 3 - Business Operations 1. Describe Products produced or services offered (attach product brochures if available) N/A What types of materials will be shipped into and/or stored within the premises ? Fire trucks and equipment. Materials be shipped by: rail__ Other (sPecify) Semi truck 3. Will delivery vehicles be stored on the property? Yes __ No 4. Doesthe business planfuture expansions atthislocation? Yes No × If yes, describe amount ofanticipated expansion and timing. Interim use only. Property is being leased during the duration of the construction of the new Public SafuLy bldg. Will the business require any modifications to the exterior of the existing building including but not limited to doors, windows, overhead doors, cooling towers, HVAC units, etc? Yes No if yes, please describe and attach a floor plan and exterior building elevation drawings. Will the proposed operation involve: Noise Generation: Yes__ If yes, describe source and amount- No × -484- Operations Rev.6/01 Odor Generation: Yes No amount · If yes, describe source and Toxic and/or Hazardous Waste GeneratiOn: Yes If yes, describe source and amount X Provide a detailed listing of all chemicals which will be discharged into the sanitary sewer system. 8, Will the operations include either interior or exterior storage of bulk chemicals? Yes ~ No X If yes, attach floor plan and/or site plan showing location and describe spill/leakage containment provisions. Other than chemicals, will the operation require outdoor storage of any materials? Yes ~ No × If yes, describe materials and attach site plan showing locations and identifying proposed screening by type and location. Section 4 - Certification I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers and plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Signature of Applicant ~ (,. Date 1/23/03 (0~ Mound F.D.) Section 5 - City Review and Action Reviewed by ' Building Offic_c_c~F I/'"'"'-- City Planner / City Engineer ~ Fire Chief ~ City Manager ~ Other l/''-'~ ~- ~ -485- EXHIBIT A Lots 19 to 21 inclusive Block 11, "Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park, Mound, Minnetonka." That part of Lots 22 and 23, Block 11, lying south of a line drawn from the most westerly corner of Block 9 to the point of intersection of the southeasterly line of Biock 11 with a line drawn parallel to and 40 feet northerly, measured at right angles, from the southerly line of Block 11 and its extension, all in "Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park, Mound~Minnetonka." Lots 1 to 5 inclusive, Block 11, "Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park, Mound, Minnetonka", according to the duly recorded plat thereof. The northerly, westerly and southerly boundary lines of said Lot 1, the northerly and southerly boundary lines of said Lots 2, 3 and 4, and the, and the · northerly, easterly and southerly boundary lines of said Lot 5 are marked by judicial landmarks set at the northwest and southwest corners of said Lot 1, at the southeast corner of said Lot 5 and at a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 5 distant 4 feet Southeasterly from the northeast corner of said Lot 5, pursuant to Torrens Case No. 15803. Lots 23 to 28 inclusive, "Koehler's Addition to Mound", Lake Minnetonka, according to the recorded plat thereof. The north, east and southerly boundary lines of said Lot 23, the north and south boundary lines of said Lots 24, 25, 26 and 27, the north, west and southerly boundary lines of said Lot 28 are marked by judicial landmarks set at the northwest and southwest corners of said Lot 28 at the northeast and southwest corners of said Lot 28 at the northeast and southeast corners of said Lot 23, pursuant to Torrens Case No. 15804. Lots 6 to 12 inclusive, Block 11 "Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park, Mound, Minnesota", according to the duly recorded plat thereof. Lots 13 to 18 inclusive, Block 11, "Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park, Mound, Minnesota'', according to the duly recorded plat thereof. The easterly line of Lot 18, Block 11, said subdivision is marked by judicial landmarks set pursuant to Case No. 15803. That part of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 13, Township 117, Range 24, all described as beginning at a point on the north line of said Lot 36, distant 25 feet west from the northeast corner thereof, which point is marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 15078; thence east to the northeast corner of said Lot 36, which point is marked by judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16002; thence south along the east line of said Lot 36 and its extension to an intersection with a line drawn parallel to and 33 feet southerly from the southerly line of said Lot 36; thence westerly along the last described parallel line to its intersection with a line drawn south, parallel to the east line of said Lot 36 and its extension from the point of beginning; thence north along said last described parallel line 34.15 feet to a point marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 15078; thence continuing north along said last described line 121.9 feet to the point of beginning. That part of Lot 8, Block 5, Sylvan Heights Addition to Mound-Minnetrista Township, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 8, which point is marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16002, thence east along the north line of said Lot 8, 358.35 feet to a point w1:._4.8. 6_"134.4 feet westerly from the northeast corner of point is marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 15805, thence westerly and northwesterly along the south line of said Lot 8, 207.77 feet to a point which is marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16002; thence continuing northwesterly along said south line 162.58 feet to a point which is marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16002; thence continuing northwesterly along said south line to the west line of said Lot 8; thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 8 to a point which is 40.14 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 8, which point is marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16002; thence according to the recorded plat thereof. That part of the southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4, Section 13, Township 117, Range 24 described as beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170. Hennepin County, Minnesota, said point being marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16002; thence westerly, along the north line of said Lot 36 a distance of 25 feet to a point marked by a. judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 15078; thence north parallel with the east line of said southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4, to the point of intersection with a line 40 feet northerly of measured at a right angle to and parallel with the northerly line of said Lot 36 said point of intersection being marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 17105 thence easterly, along the last described parallel line a distance of 25 feet to the point of intersection with the east line of said southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4, said point of intersection being marked by a judicial landmark set pursuant to Torrens Case No. 16002; thence south, along said east line, to the point of ~beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof. Lots 10 to 14 inclusive, and that part of Lot 15, lying north of the south 8 feet thereof, all in Block 2, L.P. Crevier's Subdivision of part of Lot 36 Lafayette Park. Lots 1 to 11 inclusive, Block 5; Lots 1 to 7 inclusive, and that part of Lot 8 lying easterly of a line drawn south, parallel to the east line of Lot 8, from a point on the northerly line thereof distant 134.4 feet westerly from the northeast corner of Lot 8, Block 6; All of Yost Street, vacated, lying between the extension across said street of'the northerly lines of Lots 1 to 6 inclusive, Block 6, and a line drawn from the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 6, to the southeast corner of Lot 11, Block 5; All in Sylvan Heights Addition to Mound-Minnetrista Township, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. The boundary lines of the above tract have been judicially determined and marked by judicial landmarks as shown by Torrens Case No. 15805. Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, Balboa Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. -487- EXHIBIT B -488- EXHIBIT B-'I -489- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING FUNDING OF SENIOR PROGRAMS THROUGH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT WHEREAS, the City of Mound has supported services for its elderly and disabled residents via Senior Community Services' Gillespie Senior Center with the allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound feels that the pr0yision of services for its elderly and disable residents is of great importance and should be continued, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mound recommends to the Consolidated Pool Selection Committee that CBDG funding of Senior Community Services' Gillespie Senior Center is a high priority public service activity and should be continued. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of January, 2003. and seconded by Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -490- BOARD OF DIRECTORS John C. Boeder President Gordon Hughes 1st Vice President Peter Coyle 2nd Vice President John Lawson Treasurer John Gray Secretary Francis Hagen Past President Bob Bean Member-at-Large Gloria Johnson Member-at-Large Guritz Higuchi Dwight Johnson Marvin Johnson Laurie LaFontaine Rep. Ann Lenczewski Kevin Max Dr. Chinyere (Ike) Njaka Dotty O'Brlen Senator Gen Olson Curtis A. Pearson Mary Tambornino Leonard J. Thlel Tom Ticen Benjamin F. Withhart Executive Director & C.E.O. PROGRAMS · Multi-Purpose Senior Centers · Senior Outreach · H.O.M.E. · Transportation Founding Member of Eldercare Partners A United Way Agency SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 10709 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 111, Mlnnetonka, MN 55305 Phone: (952) 541-1019 FAX: (952) 541-0841 January 16,2003 Mayor Pat Meisel and Council ~ity of Mound 5§~tl M~d ~ad Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Meisel and Council Members: Senior Community Services is requesting that the City of Mound pass, and send back to us, a resolution favoring a continuation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for senior programs. A sample resolution is attached for your consideration. We would like .to include the resolution in our application to the Consolidated Pool for the next CDBG year which must be submitted by March 7, 2003. CDBG funding to help support the sevices for seniors provided by Senior Community Services has continued to decline. We very much appreciate the City's commitment of support for 2003. The contact person for our request is our Gillespie Senior Center Director, Cathy Bailey (472-6502). On behalf of the area seniors who are the direct beneficiaries of the services, our thanks for your continued support of the senior programs, we look forward to continuing cooperation between the City of Mound and Senior Community Services. Again, many thanks for your support. Sincerely, Ron Bloch Program Administrator cc.: Kandis Hanson, City Manager -491 - DECLARATION OF EASEMENT THIS DECLARATION OF EASEMENT (the "Declaration") is made this day of ,2003, by the City of Mound, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Declarant"). Recitals A. Declarant is the fee owner of certain real estate (the "Property") in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: That part of Lots 10 and 11, Koehler's Addition to Mound Lake Minnetonka lying Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot 11, distant 6.00 feet Westerly of the Northeast comer of said Lot 11; thence Southerly, parallel with the East line of said Lot 11, a distance of 41.47 feet; thence Southerly 155.80 feet along a tangential curve, concaved Westerly, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 29 degrees 45 minutes 23 seconds and said line there terminating. B. Declarant wishes to establish a non-exclusive, permanent easement for public right-of-way purposes as hereinafter described in, over and across the Property. Declaration Now, therefore, the Declarant hereby declares that the Property shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following easement, which shall inure to the benefit of the City of Mound and the public: 1. Public Right-of-Way Easement. The Property shall be subject to a non-exclusive, -492- perpetual easement for public right of way. purposes over, under and across the Property. 2. Scope of Easement Rights. The perpetual public fight-of-way easement created herein includes the fight of' the City of Mound, its contractors, agents and employees to enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of locating, constructing, operating, maintaining, altering, and repairing a public roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water facilities, sidewalk, trail, or other public facilities or improvements of any type that are not inconsistent with a public fight-of-way use. 3. Easement to Run with Land; No Merger. The easement created herein shall run w_i_t~_th_e_ 1 ~an~d _arr~_~d b? b~in_di_n_.g_._ on~a~! p~.a~__ie~s__h_avi~ng____~an_y right, title or interest in the Property, their heirs, successors and assigns. The Declarant intends that the easement created herein shall not merge in Declarant's title to the Property and that any future conveyance of the Property by Declarant shall be subject to this Declaration of Easement 4. Amendment; Modification; Termination. This Declaration may not be amended, modified or terminated without the consent of the City of Mound. CITY OF MOUND By. Its Mayor By. Its City Manager -493- STATE OF MINNESOTA COLrNTY OF HENNEPIN } SS. The foregoing was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ,2001 by Pat Meisel and Kandis M. Hanson, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Mound, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the muniCipal corporation, Grantor. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Notary Public -494- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com To: DCAC From: Katie Hoff, Jim Fackler Dat~: 1/17/2003 Re: 2003 Dock Map Changes Below you will find a chart that lists the Dock Map Changes for the 2003 season. Also attached is the 2003 Dock Location file. If you have any questions please contact us. Land Commons Rec # Site # Abutt/Non )e Name Slip Size Misc Information I 5091(; a D Bdghton Change to Class D Cornmon~sis~t w/land use 2 5094{; n O Brighton Change to Class D Cornmons-cor~$ist_~. t w/land use 3 51705 n A Brighton Change to Class A ~-cx3nsistent w/land use 4 51885 n D Bdghton Change to Class D C(xTrnons-consistent w/land use printed on recycled paper -495- During this discussion, Hanus was asked if the Council had set up a meeting with the DCAC yet. He stated it is tentatively slated for February, and encouraged aH the commissioners to attend. Fackler was asked to research the cost of the multiple slip dock and the in and out fees for the February 20, 2003 meeting. Goldberg also requested a spreadsheet which included rip-rap figures. Discuss: 2003 Dock Location Map Changes Fackler stated that he met with John Cameron recently and the new maps should be completed soon, and he will hopefully bring them with ~°'the February meeting. Goldberg asked him what the advantage to.theSe maps will be. Fackler stated they will show setbacks, shoreline, etc, willb~"~i~'invaluable resource for the LMCD and the public ~.. MOTION by Funk to forward the 2003 ~0:~k Lo~ation Map Cl~'~ges to the Council with changes 1 through 4 apprOVed and change #5 postp6~i~d:until next meeting. Second by Goldberg. MotiOn Ch} ded... i~?''' -496- City of Mound Dock Program AbutU Land Commons Rec # Site # No. Type Name Type Slip Size Misc Information 1 00010 n D Avocet 2 00050 n D Avocet 3 00070 n D Avocet 4 00125 n D Bluebird 5 00145 n D Canary s 00195 n D Dove Lane 7 00215 n D Dove Lane 8 00235 n D Dove Lane 9 00255 n D DOw Lane l0 00275 n D Dove Lane 11 00295 n D Dove Lane 12 00315 n D Dove Lane 13 00335 n D Dove Lane 14 00385 n D Dove Lane 15 00400A ri D Bluebird South Slip 18 x 8 16 00400B n D Bluebird South Slip 18 x 8 17 00685A n D Woodland Rd Slip 20 x 8.5 18 00685B n D Woodland Rd Slip 20 x 8.5 19 01685A n D Bluebird North Slip 24 x 10 20 01685B n D Bluebird North Slip 24 x 10 21 01685C n D Bluebird North Slip 24 x 10 22 01685D n D Bluebird North Slip 24 x 10 23 01952A 13 D Dove Lane Slip 20 x 8.5 24 01952B n D Dove Lane Slip 20 x 8.5 ~ 25 01952C n D Dove Lane Slip 16 x 6 26 01952D n D Dove Lane Slip 16 x 6 27 02150A n D Eag!e Lane Slip 24 x 10 26 02150B n D Eagle Lane Slip 24 x 10 29 02150C n D Eagle Lane Slip 24 x 10 30 02150D n D Eagle Lane Slip 24 x 10 31 02360A n D Finch Lane Slip 24 x 10 32 02360B n D Finch Lane Slip 24 x 10 33 02360C 13 D Finch Lane Slip 24 x 10 34 02360D n D Finch Lane Slip 24 x 10 35 02545A n D Gull Lane Slip 24 x 10 36 02545B n D Gull Lane Slip 24 x 10 37 02605 a D Pebble Sch 38 02635 n D Pebble Bch 39 02665 n D Pebble Bch 40 02695 a D Pebble Bch 41 02720 n D Pebble Bch 42 02750 n D Pebble Bch 43 02810 n D 3 Pts 44 02840 n D 3 Pts 45 02870 n D 3 Pts 46 02900 n D 3 Pts 47 02930 n D 3 Pts 48 04070 n D Beachside N 49 04110 n D I~eachside N 50 10020 n D Shorewood Ln 51 10066A n D Beachside S Slip 24 x 9 Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 1 of 9 1/17/2003 -497- Ci~ o~ Mound Dc~k Program Abutt/ Land Commons Rec # Site # Non Type Name Type Slip Size Misc Information 52 10066B n D !Beachside S Slip 24 x 9 53 10066C n D Beachside S Slip 20 x 8 54 10220 n D ~Crese~ Prk 55 10250 a D Cresent Prk 58 10280 a D Cresent Prk r 57 10310 a D Cresent Prk 58 10340 n D Crese.t P,~ 59 10370 a D Cresent so 10400 n D Cresent Prk 61 10430 n D Cresent Prk 62 10460 a D Cresent Prk 83 10490 n D Cresent Prk 84 10520 a D Cresent P~k ss 10550 a D Cresent Prk 66 10580 n D Cresent Prk 67 10610 a D Cresent Prk 88 10640 a D Creser~ P~ 89 10670 a D Cresent Prk 70 10700 a D Crese.t P~ 71 12430 n D Wren (street) 72 12490 a D Wieta 73 12520 n D Wiota 74 12550 a D Wio~a 75 12580 a D Wiota 76 12610 a D VVi~3ta 77 12640 n D Wiota 78 12670 n D Wiota - 79 12700 n D Wiota 80 12730 n D WioU, 81 12760 a D Wieta 82 12790 n D Wiota 83 12820 a D Wiota 84 12850 n D W~a 85 12880 a D Wk~a 86 12910 n D Wiota 87 12940 n D VViota, SS 12970 a D Wiota 89 13000 n D Wiota 9O 13030 n D Wiota 91 13060 n D Wie~a 92 13090 a D VVio~a 93 13120 n D Wiola 94 13150 n D VViota 95 1'3180 a D Wiota 96 13210 n D 97 13240 n D Wiota 98 13270 n D Wieta 99 13300 a D i Wiota lo0 13330 n D Wtota 101 13360 a D Wiota ~02 13390 n D Wiota I Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 2 of 9 1/17/2003 -498- City of Hound, Dock Program Abutt/ Land Commons Rec # Site # Non Type Name Type Slip Size Uisc Information 103 13420 n D Wiota 104 13450 n D Wiota lO5 13480 a D Wiota 106 13510 n D Wiota lo7 13540 n D Wiota 108 13570 n D Wiota 109 13600 n D Wiota 110 13630 n D Wiota 11~ 13660 n D Wiata 112 13690 a D Wiota 113 13720 n O Wiota ~14 13750 n D Wk~a 1 ~5 13780 n D Wiota ~S 13810 a D Wiota ~7 20050 a D Peabody 118 20160 n D Waterbank ~19 20190 n D Waterbank 120 20220 n D Waterbank 121 20250 n D Waterbank 122 20280 a D Waterbank 123 20310 n D Waterbank 124 20340 a D Wate~bank 125 20370 a D Waterbank 126 20400 n D Waterbank 127 20430 n D Waterbank ~2s 20460 n D Waterbank 129 20490 n D Waterba. k ~30 20520 n O Waterbank 131 20550 n D Waterbank 132 20580 n D Waterbank 133 20610 n D Waterbank 134 20640 n D Waterbank ~35 20670 a D Waterbank 136 20700 n D Waterbank 137 20730 n D Waterbank 138 ~20760 n D Waterside 139 i20790 n D Waterside 140 20810 n D Waterside 141 20830 n D Centerview 142 ;20860 n D Cemen~ew 143 20890 n D Cemerview 144 20920 n D Centerview 145 20950 n D Centerview ~46 20980 n D Centerview 147 21110 n D Centen,,iew 448 21140 n D Cente~view 149 21170 n D iCenterview ~5o 21200 n D Centen/i~ 151 21230 n D Centerview 152 22180 a D Waterside 153 22200 n D Waterside Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 3 of 9 1/17/2003 -499- City of IVtound Dock Program Abutt/ Land Commons Rec# Site # Non Type Name Type Slip Size Misc Information 154 22220 n D Waterside 455 122240 n D Waterside 15s 22260 n o Waterside 157 22330 n D Waterside 158 22360 a D Waterside 459 22390 n D Watemide 160 22420 n D Waterside 464 22450 n D Waterside 162 22480 a D Waterside ~83 22510 n D Waterside ' ~s4 22540 n D 165 22570 Q D Waterside 166 22600 a .D Waterside ~67 22910 a D Morton 188 22990 a D Nodh Pa~ lS9 23050 a D i ?~th ;7o 23070 n D Nodh Pa~ 171 23090 a D Fairview 172 23150 a D Faiwiew 173 23200A n D Fairview Slip 27.5x 10 174 23200B n D Fairview Slip 24 x 10 475 23200C n D Fain~ew Slip 24 x 10 176 23200D n D Fai~iew Slip 27;5 x 10 177 23200E n D Fai~vie~v Slip 18x8 178 23275 n D Chateau 179 23325 nn D A~x~ 180 30020 n D 181 30100A n D Carlson Prk 'Slip 24 x 10 182 30100B n D Carlson Prk Slip 24xi0 lS3 30100C n D Carlson P~ Slip 24 x 10 484 30100D n D Calson Prk Slip 24x10 lSS 30100E n D Ca~son P~ Slip 24 x 10 ~88 30100F n D ~Prk Slip 24x10 ~87 30100G n D Carlson Prk Slip 24 x 10 488 30100H n D CmlSOn p~ Slip 24 x 10 189 301001 n D Ca~sen Prk Slip 24 x 10 ~90 30100J n D Cadson P~ SliP 24 x 1'0 191 30100K n D Carl ,son Prk Slip 24x10 192 30100L n D CarlsonPrk Slip 24 x 10 193 30250 n D ~nwoed 194 30300 n D Avon 195 30330 n D Emerald 196 30350 n D Emerald 197 30370 n D Emerald m8 30450 a C Longford Rd 199 30510 a C Longford Rd 20o 30590 a C Leagford Rd 204 30670 a c Longf~rd Rd 202 30710 a c Longfc~d Rd 203 30950A a c Longford Rd 204 30950B a c Longford Rd I Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 4 of 9 1/17/2003 -500- Cib/of ~ Otck Program ^~tt/ Land Commons Rec# Site Cf Non Type Name Type Slip Size Misc Information 205 30950C a c Lengf°rd Rd 2o6 30950D a c Longford Rd 207 30950E a c Lengford Rd 208 30950F a c Longford Rd 209 30954A a c Longford Rd 210 30954B a c Lengford Rd 2Il 312'10 a D Kenmore 212 31240 a D Kenmore 213 31270 a D Kenmore 214 31300 n D Keamore 215 31330 n D Kenmore 216 31360 a D Kenmore 217 31390 n D Kenmore 218 31420 n D Kenmore 219 31450 a D Kenmore 220 31480 n D Kenmore 221 31510 n D Kenmore 222 31540 a D Kenmore 223 31570 n D Kenmore 224 31600 a D Kenmore 225 31630 n D Kenmore 226 31'680 n D Excelsior 227 31710 n D Excsisior 228 31740 n D F_xc~sior 229 31770 a D Excelsior 230 31800 a D Excelsior 231 31830 n D F_xc~or 232 318~0 n D Exc~sior 233 31890 a D Excelsior 234 31920 n D Excelsior 235 31950 a D Excsisior 236 31980 n D Excasior 237 32010 n D Exc~sior 238 32040 a D Excelsior 239 32070 n D Excelsior 240 32100 n D Excelsior 241 32130 a D Excsiaor 242 32160 a D Excelsior 243 32190 n D Exc~or 244 32220 n D Excelsior 245 32250 n D Excelsior 246 32280 a D Excelsior 247 :32310 n D Excelsior 248 32340 n D Exc~sior 249 32600 n D Ksils 250 32670 a D Stratford Lane 251 32710 a D Stafford Lane 252 32750 a D Stratford Lane 253 32790 a D St~[;ord Lane 254 32820 a D iStmfford Lane 255 32940 a D Stratford Lane Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 5 of 9 1/17/2003 -501 - City of Mound Dock Pro,mm Abutt/ Land Commons Rec # Site # Non Type Name Type Slip Size Misc Information 256 33287 n D Stratferd Lane I 257 33347 a D Stratford Lane 258 33407 a D S~;~d Lane 259 33447 a c Stratf~-d Lane 260 33487 a C Stratford Lane 261 133525 a c Stratford Lane 262 i40550A n D Avalon Prk Slip 35.5 x 10 263 40550B n D Avalon Prk Slip 32 x 10 264 40550C n D Avalon Prk Slip 32 x 10 265 405500 n D Avalon Prk Slip 32 x 10 2SS 40550E n D Avalon Prk Slip 32 x 10 267 40550F n D Avalon Prk Slip 35.5 x 10 268 40550G* n D Avalon Prk Slip 32x10 * 5/28102 CC apprvd tem~ site until non-ronewal 269 40550H* n D Avalon Prk Slip 32 x 10 * 5/28102 CC apprvd temporary site until non-reaewal 270 405501 n D Avalon Prk Slip 75 sq ~ 271 40550J n D Avalon Prk Slip 75 sqff 272 40820A n B Sche~an Prk Slip 27.5x10 273 40820B n B Schen~an Prk Slip 24 x 10 274 40820C n B Schen/an Prk Slip 24 x 10 275 40820D n B Schervan Prk Slip 24 x 10 276 40820E n B Schervan Prk Slip 24 x 10 277 40820F n B Schentan Pd( Slip 24 x 10 278 40820(~ n B Schervan Prk Slip 27.5 x 10 279 40820H n a Schervan Prk Slip 18x8 250 408201 n B Scher~an Prk Slip 18 x8 281 40945 a S Devon 282 40995 a s Devon 253 41050 a B Devon 264 41110 a c Devon 285 41140 a c Devon 286 41170 a c Devon 287 41227 a C Devon 285 41272 a c Devon 289 41319 a C IDevon 290 41377 a c Devon 291 41437 a C iDevon 292 41650 a c ~Devan 293 41750 a c iDe~n 294 41854 a C Devon 295 41933 a c ~Devon 2~ 42008 a c Devon 297 42059 n D Devon 298 42091 a C Dev~ 299 42121 a c Dean 30O 42172 a c Devon 301 42227 a c Devon 302 42277 a c Devon 303 42314 a C Devon 304 'i42351 a C Devon 305 42406 a c :Devon 306 42461 a C ,Devon J Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 6 of 9 1/17/2003 -502- City of Mound Dock Program Abutt/ Land Commons Rec # Site # Non Type Name Type Slip Size Misc Information 307 42511 a c Devon 308 42556 a C Devon 309 42586 a c Devon 310 42626 a c Devon 311 42691 a B Devon 312 42791 a B Devon 313 42800A n B Devon Mult Slip 27.5 x '10 314 42800B n B Devon Muir Slip 24x10 315 42800C n B Devon Mult Slip 24 x 10 316 42800D n s Devon Muir Slip 24 x 10 317 42800E n B Devon Mult Slip 24 x 10 318 42800F n B Devon Mult Slip 27;5 x 10 319 42961 a B Devon 320 43020 a B Devon 321 43080 a c Devon 322 43120 a C Devon 323 43180 a c Devon 324 43235 a C Devon 325 43300A n B Amhurst Mult Slip 27.5 x 10 326 43300B n E~ Amhumt Mult Slip 24 x 10 327 43300C n [~ Amhurst Mult Slip 24 x 10 328 43300D n B Amhumt Muir Slip 27.5 x 10 329 43420 a E~ Devon 330 43450 a c Devon 331 43520 a C Devon 332 43575 a c Devon 333 43647 a c Devon 334 ~43727 a c IDevon 335 43770 a c Devon 336 43800 a C Devon 337 43840 a c Devon 338 43882 a C Devon 339 43942 a c Devon 340 44002 a c Devon 341 44097 a c Devon 342 44160 a C Devon 343 44193 a c Devon 344 44243 a c Devon 345 4'!'!08 a c Devon 345 50238A n D Waterbury Slip 24 x 8 347 50238B n D Waterbury Slip 24 x 10 I 348 50238C n D Waterbury Slip 24 x 10 349 50238D n D Wated)ury Slip 24 x 8 35o 50400 a D Brighton Blvd 351 50430 n D Brighton Blvd 352 50460 a D Brighton Blvd 353 50490 a D Brighton Blvcl 354 50520 a D B~ghton Bird 355 50550 a D Brighton Blvd 356 50580 n D Brighton Blvd 357 50610 n D Brighton Blvd Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 7 of 9 1/17/2003 -503- City of Mound Dock Program AbuW Land Commons Rec # Site # Non Type Name Type Slip Size Misc Information 358 50640 a. D Brighton Blvd 359 50670 n D Brighton Bird 380 50700 a D Brighton Bird 361 50760 n D Brighton Blvd 362 50790 a D Brighton 363 50820 a D Brighton 364 50850 n D Brighten 365 50880 n D Brighten 385 50910 a D Brighton 367 50940 n D Brighton 3ss 50970 a C Brighton 369 51030 a C Brighton 370 51105 a c Brighton 371 51135 a c Brighton 372 51195 a c Brighton 373 51315 a c Brighton 374 51375 a C Brighton 375 51435 a C Brighton 376 51495, a c Brighton 377 51555 a c Brighton 378 51675 a c Brighton 379 51705 n A B~ghton 380 51735 a c Brighton 381 51795 a c Brighton 382 51850 a c Brighton 383 51885 n D Brighton 384 ~B:D?~:, , a:~ , ~, ~ 5446 Bartlett Bird-Applicant request chg/addtn of abutting site 384 54970 n D Lost Lake 385 ~55000 n D Lost Lake 386 55030 n D Lost Lake 387 55060 n D Lost Lake 388 55090 a D Lost Lake 389 55120 n D Lost Lake 390 55150 a D Lost Lake 391 55180 n D Lost Lake 392 60640 n D tdl~vood: 393 60685 n D Idlewood 394 60765A n D Twin Park Slip 27.5 x 10: 395 60765B n D TwinPark Slip 24 x 10 396 60765C n D Twin Park Slip 24 x 10 397 60765D n D Twin, Park Slip 24 x 10 398 60835A n D Highland Prk Slip 27.5 x 10 399 60835B n D Highland Prk Slip 24 x 1:0 4O0 60835C n D Highland Prk Slip 24 x 10 401 60835D n D Highland Prk Slip 24 x 10 402 60835E n D Highland Prk Slip 24 x 10 403 60835F n D Highland Prk Slip 27.5 x 10 404 60835G n D Highland Prk Slip 75 sq E 405 60835H n D Highland Prk Slip 75 sq E 406 60940 a D Highland Prk 407 60965 a D Highland PH< Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 8 of 9 1/17/2003 -504- City of Mound Dock Program Abutt/ Land Commons ! Rec # Site # Non Type Name Type Slip SiZe Misc Information 408 61010 n D IRidgewood 40~ 61030 n D Ridge~vood 410 61050 n D Ridge~vood 411 61090 n D Ridgewood 412 61110 n D Ridgewood 413 61150 n D Ridgewood 414 61190 n D Lagoon Prk 415 61215 n D Lagoon Prk 416 61240 n D Lagoon Prk 417 61265 n D Lagoon Prk Dock Map Changes for 2003; 2003 Page 9 of 9 1/17/2003 -505- LMCIT LIABILTIY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects. If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. The decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return this form to the LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney. The City of Mound & HRA accepts liability coverage limits of $ from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). 300,000/1,000,000 Check one: X The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of city council meeting Signature Position Return this completed from to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul MN55103-2044 Page 1 of 1 -506- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472~0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Mayor and City Council Bonnie Ritter Public Gathering Permit Application January 23, 2003 I have received an application for a Public Gathering Permit from John Hesse of Performance Promotions (Gander Mountain Invitational Bass Tournament)., for a Bass Fishing Tournament Weigh-In to be held on July 12, 2003, at Mound Bay Park. printed on recycled paper -507- 1~/16 C, ITY OF MOIJND CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERIIqG P.~RM/T Use o£a public park or conunons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to inteffer~ with traffic aad general use oft. he park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIOUOR._ORBEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF, ,THE CITY PARI~,, OR BUILDINGS,. Or up is to remove ail htt~ a~td ~h[and provld~ a d~oolt to ms~e cleamng up of the park ~rea. / P~.R_Mrr~:s~0o~^¥ ' f) ~ = /~_,d: ~ %DO , .:. . , .i":~,:o --~?.-'~: ~,, 7. ~] ~ ~ '- ,:~-'" - ' *~' - ~ ..... ~ : - ~ ,, ~'-'.~", . . . , .......... .::,.. ,;,~.'.,? : : ,,..:. ~:.... ~.,. .~ .. ,,~ . ...: ..... ~~a~~a .... ... ~,~ .; ....~,;; .... ,¢, '.'~ .~. . . ,.,: ~, ,.',., :'.,. ..,..'.~., ,, . ,~ ' .::j,,... , ,: .,. , ,,".,., '"' '~ .'.' .' ' ".' i' '_' ,. ,"'~': .... &: ..... t'~.'. ........ ,.~ :ci~y,,¢lerl,,jt:,.- .::. '..:" . -508- CITY OF MOUHD Meeting Minutes Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting held onl/21/03 Date printed 01/22/03 The meeting was convened at 2 PM Monday, January 2'1,200:3 at Mound Fire Station: Present: Kandis Hanson City KH Todd Christopherson Amcon TC John McKinley City JM Miles Britz SEH MB Greg Pederson City GP 1. Survey - Property Line - GP reviewed the layout of the driveway and neighbor to the south. 2. Reviewed a couple of new options. The additional parking is not highly functional due to the extreme grades in the area. 3. Precast - the all day tour to look at other panels will be on Thursday, January 30. The group will meet Miles at Hanson Spancrete. GP to see who else would be able to go from the Fire Department. 4. Furniture - 5. GP has a layout drawing from Metro Systems that shows the locations of the furniture. They would like to have cork installed from the top of the counter to the ceiling along the segmented exterior wall in the lower ReportJEEO room. MB pointed out that the plans call for upper cabinetry/shelving along that wall that would get in the way of the cork and the maps/drawings that are planned for that wall. MB will come up with a detail for open book shelves under the counter and elimination of the upper cabinets. The book shelf at each station will be for the Emergency Manual that each person will need to have per JM. Another "pin-able" surface may be used in lieu of actual cork for cost savings - OK per JM and KH. Also, the west wall of the same room should be half cork and half white board. JM reviewed requirements for the property storage room. The evidence pass through shown in that room was not part of Mid Amedca's bid, however, they could supply that also and they may have already given JM a price on it. MB and TC confirmed that the evidence pass through is not part of the building contracts. The concern in this room is that there is not enough room for a computer or work station that may need to be added in the future. MB to look at this area - work stations, if added, would be done with modular furniture, not casework. 10. Also looked at the training room on 2nd floor. Go with the white board at the front only, no added cork materials. 11. Reception Area- need to make some revisions to how these work stations will be designed and used. Metro wants to talk with MB about the front counters - should they be furniture work stations or built in? Also, the sailboat in the lobby seems to be dictating what is happening with the function. It:was agreed that the windows would be located based upon counter function and if the sailboat could still be added it would be put back in. 12. Roofing - MB presented two other material options for the sloped roof as an option to the fish scale look. TC to get info to Specialty Systems for pricing. Dura Loc and Metro Roofing systems were reviewed. Also discussed using asphalt shingles as an option. 13. Council meeting - remember that contingency dollar approval is an HRA agenda item, not a Council meeting item. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.lE5~NGGA448\MPS 01 021 03.doc -509- Page 1 of 2 CITY OF MOUND Meeting held on 1/21/03 Date planted 01/22/03 14. Discussed the budget- 15. TC recommends setting aside $250,000 of the total contingency for construction related issues. Any unused funds remaining at the end of the project belong to Mound. 16. Reviewed cost savings - not too many other ideas besides the ones already discussed. 17. Agreed that we need one more meeting to look at alternates, cost savings, and contingency needs. Also, we will have the information related to Hanson Spancrete panel finish for the next meeting. 18. Next meeting will be Monday, Feb. 3rd at 4 PM. 19. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5~NGGA448\MPS 01 021 03.doc -510- Page 2 of 2 Page 1 of 1 Kandis M Hanson From: To: Sent: Subject: "Todd Christopherson" <tchristoph@amconconstruction.com> "Mound Fire Department" <moundfiredept@hotmail.com>; "Bontrager, Sam" <sbontrager@sehinc.com>; "Britz, Miles" <mbritz@sehinc.com>; "Hanson, Kandis" <kandishanson@cityofmound.com>; "McKinley, John" <johnmckinley814@yahoo.com>; "Smith, Sarah" <sarahsmith@cityofmound.com>; "Bob G. (Laptop & Phone),, <BobG.Laptop&Phone@amconconstruction.com>; "Don G. (Laptop& Phone)" <DonG.Laptop@amconconstruction.com>; "Prosser, James" <jprosser@ehlers-inc.com>; "Ritter, Bonnie" <bonnieritter@cityofmound.com>; "Schultz, Nancy" <nschultz@sehinc.com>; "Simoneau, Matt" <mattsimoneau@cityofmound.com> Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:28 AM recommendations for 1/28 Council Meeting Based on our meeting earlier this week, we are making the following recommendations: 1 .. Award the fourteen contracts (14) as listed on attachment A (I will fax this report to Kandis under separate cover) for a total of $882,896 V¥ith these fourteen contracts awarded, the total amount of contracts awarded to date will be $3,984,356 as shown on attachment B (again, a separate report that will be faxed to Kandis) 2. Hold on decisions related to bid alternates until further review by building committee and until after the all day tour that i~s scheduled for Thursday, 1/30/03. Upon comPleting the tour to review precast finish options on actual buildings, the committee will be able to decide what level of finish is acceptable which will determine the amount of cost savings available in that area. 3. At a future Council and HRA meeting, the committee will present the recommended alternates and corresponding budget adjustments. We will also make a recommendation for use of contingency dollars at that time. The contracts that are left to be awarded need further review and/or re-bid. The landscaping contract and irrigation contracts will be re-bid with the intend of attracting more bidders and hopefully a better price than the December bids. The total value of the non-awarded contracts will be less than 10% of the total of all bids. Todd Christopherson, P.E. Amcon CM, LLC Burnsville, MN 55337 952-808-5369 direct 952-890-0064 fax 952-200-4955 T-Mobile (this replaces previous Nextel) visit our NEW website at www.amconconstruction.com -511 - 1/23/03 Contract Summaries Contractor Mound Contractor C-01 Max Steininger C-02 Veit and Company, Inc. C-03 Nova Frost ~nc. C-04 Northwest Asphalt, C-05 Re-Bid C-06 Re-bid C-07 Re-bid C-08 Kelleher Construction, Inc. C-09 Hanson Spancrete Midwest, Inc. C-10 Axel H Ohman, C-11 Thumbeck Steet Fabrication, Inc. C-12 Western Steel Erection, C-13 Kellington Construction, Inc. C-14 Dalco Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. C.15 Specialty Systems - Hold for revisions C-16 Straughan Hardware, Inc. C-17 Twin Ci~ Garage Door Company C-18 Empirehouse, inc. C-19 Hold C-20 Ceilings & Floors, Inc. C-21 Combined wi[h C-20 C-22 Royal Floor Covering Co., Inc. C-23 Pro Maintenance Inc. C-24 Steinbrecher Painting Inc. C-25 Mid-America Business Systems C-26 Hold C-27A TBD C-27B TBD C-27C TBD C-27D TBD C-27E TBD C-27F TBD C-27G TBD C-27H TBD C-271 TBD C-27J TBD C-27K TBD C-27L TBD C-28 St. Cloud Restaurant Supply C-29 Hold C-30 Offisource, Inc. C-31 Schindter Elevator Corporation C-32 Allied Mechanical Systems of Hutchinson, Inc. C-33 Ridgedale Electric, Inc. AMCON Mound Public Safety Facility 37,200 372OO 5&7.800 567.800 50.400 56.400 82.900 82.~00 466.872 466,872 ?23.334 723.334 16~000 160.000 108.054 108.C54 77,9~9 77,969 93.250 93.250 139,775 139.775 47.233 47.233 68.860 68.860 123.268 123.268' 53,313 53,313 67,932 67.932 15,317 15,3!7 49.800 ' 49800 9,294 9r294 15,995 3.240 40.900 613,960 362.000 3,9~4.358 15395 3,240 40.900 613.650 362,000 3,984.356 Printed On: 1/23/2003 1 TOTRL F'. 83 -512- JAN-2~-2~O~ 12:22 ~MCON CONSTRUCTION CO ~52 8~0 0064 P.02/83 Contract Summaries Contractor Mound Contractor C-03 Nova Frost Inc. C-04 Northwest Asphalt, Inc C-12 Western Steel Erection, [nc. C-13 Kellington Construction, Inc. C-14 Dalco Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. C-17 Twin City Garage Door Company C~18 Empirehouse, Inc. C-20 CeiFings & Floors, Inc. C-22 Royal Floor Covering Co., inc. C-24 Steinbrecher Painting Inc. C-25 Mid-America Business Systems C-28 St. Cloud Restaurant _Supply C-30 Offi$ource, Jnc. C-31 Schindler Elevator Corporation Signed Insurance Mound Public 9afety Facility 56.400 56.400 82.900 62 900 77.969 77 969 93.25O 93,250 139.775 139,775 68,860 68,860 123.268 123.268 53.313 53,313 67,932 67,932 49,800 "39.800 9,294 9,294 15,995 __~ 15 995 3,240 ................... 3,240 40,900 40.900 882.896 882.896 AMCON Printed On: 1123/2003 -513- 5341 Mayxvood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 SUPPLEMENT TO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 21, 2003 SUBJECT: Request for release of portion of Hennepin County tax-forfeited parcel (Lots 14-15) APPLICANT: Mike Kramer LOCATION: Adjacent to property located at 5500 Breezy Road PID: 13-117-24-23-0053 ZONING: R- 1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY At its January 14, 2003 meeting, the City Council tabled the request from Mike Kramer to consider release of a Hennepin County tax-forfeit parcel (Lots 14-15) which is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road as the applicant was not present. Members of the City Council are advised that Mr. Kramer has been invited to attend the January 28, 2003 meeting and it is anticipated that he will be in attendance. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A copy ofM. S.S. 282.018 regarding tax-forfeit property adjacent to public waters and the involvement of the Mn/DNR has been included as an attachment. In the event the City Council approves the request, it will be forwarded to Hennepin County to commence the "release process" which is anticipated to begin later this year. Therefore, the City of Mound will have another opportunity to provide formal comment regarding the request following receipt of the materials from Hennepin County. As the recommendation(s) from the PC, POSAC and DCAC were inconsistent, a resolution has been prepared in advance of the City Council's review. If the request is approved by the City Council, a resolution would be prepared based on the Council's findings and included as a consent agenda item at the February 11, 2003 meeting. -514- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FA)(: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.corr January 15, 2003 Mr. Mike Kramer 5500 Breezy Road Mound, MN 55364 City Council Review of Request for Release of Tax-Forfeit- PID # 13-117-24-23- 0054 Dear Mr. Kramer: At its January 15,. 2003 meeting, the City Council reviewed and discussed your request for release of a portion ora tax-forfeit parcel (Lots 14-15) that is located inm~ediately behind your home at 5500 Breezy Road. As you are aware, the Parks and Recreational Commission, the Docks and Commons Commission auld Platming C0nmfission previously reviewed the matter on November 14, 2002, November 21, 2002 and December 9, 2002 respectively. I wish to inform you that the City Council has opted to table formal action on your request until its next meeting to be held on January 28, 2003 and respectfully requests that you attend the meeting, if possible, to personally review and discuss your request with members of the City Council. If you have any questions regarding this letter or would like any additional infom~ation, please feel free to contact me at 952-472-3190. Community Development D~rec-'E6tbT~ .... _ printed on recycled paper -515- Minnesota Statutes 2002, Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 282 282.018 Land by public waters, nonforested marginal land, wetlands. Subdivision 1. Land on or adjacent to public waters. {a) Ail land which is the property of the state as a result Of forfeiture to the state for nonpayment of taxes, regardless of whether the land is held in trust for taxing districts, and which borders on or is adjacent to meandered lakes and other public waters and watercourses, and the live timber growing'or being thereon, is hereby withdrawn from sale except as hereinafter provided. The authority having jurisdiction over the tiraber on any such lands may sell the timber as otherwise provided by law for cutting and removal under such conditions as the authority may prescribe in accordance with approved, sustained yield forestry practices. The authority having jurisdiction over the timber shall reserve such timber and impose such conditions as the authority deems necessary for the protection of watersheds, wildlife habitat, shorelines, and scenic features. Within the area in Cook, Lake, and St. Louis counties described in the Act of Congress approved July 10, 1930 (46 Stat. 1020), the timber on tax-forfeited lands shall be subje&t to like restrictions as are now imposed by that act on federal lands. (b) Of all tax-forfeited land bordering on or adjacent to meandered lakes and other public waters and watercourses and so withdrawn from sale, a strip two rods in width, the ordinary high-water mark being the waterside boundary thereof, and the land side boundary thereof being a line drawn parallel to the ordinary high-water mark and two rods distant landward therefrom, hereby is reserved for public travel thereon, and whatever the conformation of the shore line or conditions require, the authority having jurisdiction over such lands shall reserve a wider strip for such purposes. (c) Any tract or parcel of land which has 150 feet or less of waterfront may be sold by the authority having jurisdiction over the land, in the manner otherwise provided by law for the sale of such lands, if the authority determines that it is in the public interest to do so. If the authority having jurisdiction over the land is not the commissioner of natural resources, the land may not be offered for sale without the 1/15/2003 -516- prior approval of the commissioner of natural resources. J (d) Where the authority having jurisdiction over lands withdrawn from sale under this section is not the commissioner of natural resources, the authority may submit proposals for disposition of the lands to the commissioner. The commissioner of natural resources shall evaluate the lands and their public benefits and make recommendations on the proposed dispositions to the committees of the legislature with jurisdiction over natural resources. The commissioner shall include any recommendations of the commissioner for disposition of lands withdrawn from sale under this section over which the commissioner has jurisdiction. The commissioner's recommendations may include a public sale, sale to a private party, acquisition by the department of natural resources for public purposes, or a cooperative management agreement with, or transfer to, another unit of government. Subd. 2. Marginal land and wetlands. Nonforested marginal land and wetlands on land that is property of the state as a result of forfeiture to the state for nonpayment of taxes is withdrawn from sale as provided in section 103F.535 unless: (1) notice of the existence of the nonforested marginal land or wetlands, in a form prescribed by the board of water and soil resources, is provided to prospective purchasers; and (2) the deed contains a restrictive covenant, in a form prescribed by the board of water and soil resources, that precludes enrollment of the land in a state-funded program providing compensation for conservation of marginal land or wetlands. HIST: 1973 c 369 s 1; 1984 c 490 s 2; 1989 c 353 s 9; 1991 c 159 s 2; 1991 c 354 art 10 s 9; 2002 c 366 s 4 Copyright 2002 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. Page 2 of 2 -517- 1/l 5/2003 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 7, 2003 SUBJECT: Request for release of portion of Hennepin County tax-forfeited parcel (Lots 14-15) APPLICANT: Mike Kramer LOCATION: Adjacent to property located at 5500 Breezy Road PID: 13-117-24-23-0053 ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY Mike Kramer has submitted a request to the City of Mound to consider release of a Hennepin County tax-forfeit parcel (Lots 14-15) which is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road. It is City staff's understanding that he would like to purchase the two (2) lots as he currently has a private dock located on the property. REVIEW PROCEDURE There is no formal review process in the City Code that deals with tax-forfeit properties. However, a 1997 in-house policy created an informal procedure to respond to such requests which requires review by City staff and the Planning Commission and the Park Commission. Additionally, a 1984 resolution established a policy regarding payment of assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit properties prior to forfeiture. Copies of both documents have been included as attachments. With regards to this particular request, City officials and commission members are advised that it was also referred to the DCAC for review as it involves lakeshore property and is currently part of the City's dock program. STAFF REVIEW Please refer to the Staff Report dated October 2, 2002 which has been included as an attachment which includes background information regarding the subject site. -518- POSAC REVIEW At its November 14, 2002 meeting, the POSAC reviewed the request and voted 4 to 2 to recommend denial of the request. DCAC REVIEW At its November 21, 2002 meeting, the DCAC reviewed the request and voted 5 to 1 to recommend approval of the request. PC REVIEW At its December 9, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and voted 4 to 2 to recommend approval of the request. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The applicant, Mike. Kramer, has been invited to attend the January 14, 2003 City Council meeting to provide comment regarding the request. Members of the City Council are advised that it is anticipated that a formal process will be established in 2003 to deal with tax-forfeit properties. In the event the City Council opts to approve the request, it will be forwarded to Hennepin County to commence the "release process." If the Council recalls, a similar request on Wilshire Boulevard was reviewed by the City at the County's request in October 2002. -519- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 9, 2002 Release of Tax-Forfeit Parcel on Breezy Road At its October 21, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request from Mike Kramer for release of a portion of a tax-forfeit parcel that is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road. Following discussion, the Commission voted to table the matter pending review of the request by the POSAC and DCAC. Additionally, the Planning Commission asked City staff to contact Hennepin County to inquiry about the process in the event the City wishes to a. cquire tax~forfeitp.arceh:~The--DCAC recommended the property be sold. The POSAC recommended the City retain the property. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Brown, to recommend the property be offered for sale to the adjoining property owner at a fair market value. Burma was concerned about the Dock program being whittled away by releasing properties such as this. MOTION carried. Glister and Burma against. Hasse, Brown, Michael and Mueller for. -520- Mound, ~ ~364 (~52) 472-31~0 MEMORANDUM Date: Re: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director 12/3/2002 Request by Mike Kramer for release of portion of tax-forfeit property (Lots 14-15) located behind his property located at 5500 Breezy Road BACKGROUND At its October 21, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request from Mike Kramer for release ora portion ora tax-forfeit parcel which is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road. Following discussion, the Commission voted to table the matter pending review of the request by the Parks and Open Space Commission (POSAC) and:the Docks and Commons Advisory Commission (DCAC.) Additionally, the Planning Commission asked City staffto contact Hennepin.County to inquiry about the process in the event the City wishes to acquire a tax-forfeit parcel. POSAC REVIEW At its November 14, 2002 meeting, the POSAC reviewed the request and voted 4 to 2 to deny the request. A copy of'the meeting minutes from the 11/14 meeting have been included as an attachment. DCAC REVIEW At its November 21, 2002 ~ting, the. DCAC reviewed: the reqd%t and voted. 5 it0.11, ito' approve the request.;: A copy of the meeting;~nutes fr0m.the .I i/21 me~*ing have been 'in'Cluded as an attachment. ~i '~' /' ' ::~ ' ':' FI-ENNEPIN COUNTY INQUmY City staff coma ,.~ed.:Hennepin~County Taxpayer Services reg~ding the. process for Public acquisk[c~h. ~t~'~ ~r~ ~: ~6~a~ ~hi~h/~ ~6~6'~'~S~:~ch i~!Ud~ ~P~b!i~ ~nveY~ee w~B involveS~ih~ tr~s-fer,~f'~:.P.~cei't~ a i;c~ g~¢~rhm~ni~:::by ~he~'County for public use (ie. p~k.) ~d public sale in which the County sells a pr;p~Yt6 tfid ~i~y abhor ~ following ~ apprise. The method used is determ~ed by the imended use of the parcel ~ questiOn. .,.~, -521 - MOUND'. AD~SOR¥i:I~ ~ OPEN SPACE CO MMISSI ON November 14, 2002 Present: Chair John Beise, Commissioners Norman Domhotdt, Derrick Hentz, Susan Taylor, Gene Hostetler, and City Council Representative David Osmek. Also Present: Absent and Excused: 'C{ti~ P~e~ent: Parks Director Jim Fackler, Recording Secretary Denice Widmer Ron Motyka ~i ~-~~er, om an ~my eese~ -~m and Cathy Veit, and two others Who did not sign in. Chair Beise called the meeting to order at 7:32pm. APPROVAL O'F THE SEPTEMBER 12, 2002 MEETING MINUTES '. MOTION by Hentz seconded by Hostetler to approve the September 12, 2002 Park and Open Space Meeting Minutes. MOTION carried unanimously. AGENDA CHANGES , No agenda changes. COMMENTS AND SU GGESTI ON S FROM, CITI ZEN S P~$ENT'ON.,~ ITEM.NOT ON ~EAGENDA:fLIMIT TO, THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER) None There were nine citizens present for this discussion. Beise gave them a rundown of what the Park and Open Space Advisory CommissiOn hopes to accomplish in their parks. Beise stated the Commission will be meeting with all the districts o'ver -522- the next few months to discuss what improvements, maintenance and community involvement is needed for their particular parks. The resident at 5641 Bartlett, Tom Reese, asked the commission exactly where each of these parks are located. Beise presented an overhead display map for this purpose. ReeSe then raised the question of the Skate park, named "Zero Gravity". (This park should be included with the District 1 parks.) Hostetler stated that construction will be getting unde~ay in the spring. He'~xplained that the funds, donated by Tom Stokes of Brenshell Homes, were expected shortly. Reese stated that he is highly in favor of this park, as there is a real need in this community for recreational areas for teens. D~o__n~:~o~xplained~!9_the_~ d~e~nts th_at~p__~k~s__rn~ is one ~f the first~t~ems t9 be . cut during the city's budget process. The commissioners realized they could no longer totally count on city money for park improvements and maintenance so they decided to turn to the residents for assistance. Domholt explained that the residents could facilitate improvements and assist in maintenance by volunteering to .supply the paint~ lumber, etc. necessary. Domholt also stated that the jc0mmission is trying to create community involvement in every aspect of the parks so that area residents have ownership. He also asked the residents to bring their concerns and complaints to the commission so they can act on them. Chris Shaw, 4978 Bartlett, then raised the question as to how they can make the fishing better at Carlson Park? He stated that people are fishing off.the docks, which is a violations and too many people are trying to cram into a small space. Beise stated that they had spoken to residents over the years to see if they wanted morepicnic tables, etc. At that time, they were opposed to making it more available to the public. Hostetler asked if signs, directing people to other fishing sites, might help. There are not many amenities at Carlson Park at the moment. Shaw stated that he appreciates the flowers the city plants, and he waters them daily, Fackler then mentioned the park vandalism problem. He asked the residents to call the police when they see violations happening. Fackler also stated that the citizens can really help the commission by bringing concerns about their parks to the City Council. ~ Shaw asked if snowmobiles do damage to the environment, He said snowmobilers come offthe lake at Carlson Park, Fac~er stated he hasn't noticed that they are a huge problem there. He stated a pmb!e~does arise during the first snowfall when snowmobilers go out and tip up the grass in the parks~ etc. Reese then asked who maintains the cemetery, Fackler stated.that itis his department, but that he is very short-staffed. He stated they seed each new grave, but are not responsible for setting headstones and/or monuments. Those complaints should be directed to the contractor. Fackler also explained how -523- 5~ weather affects the headstone and graves. He also explained rules for flowers, etc around the graves. The. park district 1 discussion was then ended. DISCUSS: REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF PORTION OF HENNEPIN COUNTy FORFEITED PARCEL (Lots I4,1S) The applicant, Mike Kfarher, was not present. Fackler stated that his recommendation was that the shoreline not be vacated. hugs ravine, it is not a build able lOt, there is nd use for a future park at the' site, and that it is basical'l:ystorm Water storage for the county road, The only benefit Beise gaw' Was the 80~ of lineal footage for the dock program. He asked if there was any benefit to the city tO have docks there. Fackler stated, that this 80' did count towards the tot'al lineal footage for the City. The docks program~ currently has 564 boats, and they are licensed for 590. He also stated that they. do have a lineal footage buffer, but that the buffer is dwindling. The lineal' fo-Otage~from this proPerty could mean more docks at Carlson Park, for instance. Fackler was asked what kind of an impact this would have on the Docks Program. He stated that it would eliminate 1.5 boats. Fackler stated he can see no, benefit, tO eithei the parks or the docks programs in giVing up this propef/y. Fackter Stated that he feels .quite strongly about not setting precedent or giving up something we can't get back. DisCUSsion then centered on what the monetary benefit would be to the city in releasing this property. Osmek stated that there would be a tax benefit to the city as the' new owner wOUld then have lakeshore. Osmek abe stated there is no real accegS tO"this Propert3/as far'as green SpaCei Taylor brought up th~ fact that Fackler is always commenting to the commission that he is short on both funds and manpower, so there would be a cost to the city if the property was designated as a park. · Question was then raised as to how many ofthe surrounding..pr~perty OWners have docks there, and whether or not the applicant has a dOck therel Ther~ is city owned dock space on that property. Fackler stated that there are private docks, but Fackler Was Unsure Whether or not the applicant had a dock ther¢.Fack/te~ stated he wOUld cheek with Docks Program Administrator, Katie Heft} i~ the m°rning on'this. *(Heft has since stated: that the appliCai~t: is phrt of the' docks program and utilizes the city-oWned dock space there:) Faclder ~as then aSk.ed i~this Property was dedicated as commons. He stated it was not, but that the land has been counted aslineal footage for docks for over 17 yea/rsl -524- Beise then stated the commission needed to consider this property from a park and open space perspective, and let the docks commission make their own decision. MOTION by Beise to deny the release of this property. MOTION SECONDED by Domholt. There were four in favor of the.motion and two opposed. 6. DISCUSS: SNOWMOBILE ISSUES Taylor statedthat some residents in her area had asked what could be done to prevent a tragedy from occurring when snowmobilers come off the lake on Manehester~at~high~s. peeds_w3 e~mkids ~sliding~tnd~tubingxmZKillerHiH~L The neighbors have asked whether this area can be patrolled. It was pointed out that the snowmobilers are not in violation, and that the hill in question is not a city-owned, designated sliding area, but there is still the issue of safety. A suggestion was made to strefch an orange, plastic snow fence from the snow fence to redirect the snowmobiles away from the hill. Fackler stated he would check with the insurance carrier regarding this issue. 7. DISCUSS: PARK NAMING Beise stated that he was very disappointed with the poor public response. Only three suggestions were received, and one of them, HaddorfField, was already out there. Beise made a recommendation to name the park at Langdon Bay after Rex Alwin, who was a true contributor to the City of Mound. He stated that the Alwin family had owned the site since its inception and that Rex was instrumental on the Parks and Planning Commissions. Fackler stated that he wanted to invite the Rottlund Homes residents to attend a meeting in December or January to discuss their park. Residents there have called to say they want to be involved. Funds are available. This park is not part of the homeowner's association. Fac!der was also asked what. the time frame was for park naming. He made the recommendation that th0y have the Parks named so signs could be made for park dedications in June, 2003. Osmek stated that he would like to suggest naming the Metro Plains Park after Frank Weiiand. Frank has served the city for 32 Years. MOTION by Osmek to name Metr9 Plains Park after Frank Weiland. Motion failed for lack of a second. Recommendation by Beise that each commissioner come up with two names for each park for the next meeting. e REVIEW: CAPITAL OUTLAY EXPENDITURES FOR 2002 $50,534.99 spentto date. $55,500:00 bUdgeted. The question was raised as to whether or not the Highland Park Play Structure was still on the' Ii'st for City Council consideration. Osmek stated it has not been discussed. Police cars need to be replaced. Domholt stated that the park dedication monies could not be used for that purpose. Osmek said the dedication mOneY was not going tO be used for any other purpose except parks, but that the money did impact the city's fund balance. Osmek stated the dedication" money could be used for' the play structure, and the city would repay it with general funds over a period oftime, which would not gemng tl~e play strueturedone. ., . REVIEW: DECEMBER CAI~ENDAR The budget will nOt be available in the packet, but may or may not be ava~lable for the meeting. Park naming and snowmobile issues will be added. Residents from Districts 2 & 3 will be invited to attend the December meeting, Districts 4 & 5 in January, and District 6 in February. REPORTS: OSmek repOrted that the council stays the same. The' general, levy had a 1.8% increase, Which is still below inflati°n. The Police Chief interviews Will be done FridaY, November 15. He also reported that he and Bob Brown have chosen a planter at the Depot as their yearly project. The downtown develoPer is working hard with Coleman and Olson to vacate the railway earlier in order to get the greenway project and the re-routing of Cry Rd 15 going sooner. The Planning CommisSion has a spot open and will be inte~iewing 5' candidates. When asked alst~ut the lVlimehaha boat, Osmek stated that it 'WaS pretty much a dead issue since the boat didn't fit under the bridge. Fackler stated he has a budget meeting on Novembe/25: ,His department is cur~rently Wititerizing their ~quipmerit: :The ret~ning Wali pr6j~? und'e~ay. He estimates that $200,0'00.00 will be spent now, and $300,000.00 will b~ sPent in the spring. The demolition of the old post office will take place some time in December. The d3edge wili nat happen, this Winter. The. Greenwa¥ pi~ojedt will hopefully begin some time in fhe sPi:ing:' lt0stetler reported that the donated money should be receiVed soon, sO the project can begin in the spring. MOTION'by Domholt tO dismiss t'he meeting. SECONDED by Beise. Meeting adjourned at 10:00pm. -526- MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION November 21, 2002 Present: Chair Jim Funk, Vice Chair Greg Eurich, Frank Ahrens, Gerald Jones, Mark Goldberg, City Council Representative Mark Hanus Also present: Parks Director Jim Fackler, Dock Inspector Katie Hoff, Secretary Denice Widmer Citizens present: Steve (Unable to read written last name), new owner of 5446 Bartlett Blvd property. Meeting Called to Order byChair Jim.Funk at .7:30pm ...... 2o 0 APPROVAL 'OF AUGUST 15, 2002 DCAC MINUTES MOTION bY Funk to accept Minutes with the changesl SECONDED by Goldberg. MotiOn carried. AGENDA CHANGES There W&re no changes. coMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON' ~ ~M NOT oN T~:AGENDA. None present. DISCUSS: . REQUEST FOR DOCK AT 5446 BARTLETT BLVD: Fackler'gavea brief baCkgrOund stating that when ibis iSsue has come up in the' past,, ii'has been granted ~'hdei' the condition that staffhas time to find a ~pot for the individual being moved out of that dock. Fackler also stated there may be the posiii~ilitY ~fputting an additional dock in this area, but there would be limits as to the size of the boat, etc. Fackler stated that there are currently 8 dock sites in this area, and two of them. are abutters. He also stated there may bea possibility of put, lng a multiple Slip dock in'this area, but~hat h~ wouldhave to dO more research on this, The issue of this property and the 929.4 line is currently being addressed. Facuer stated he woula meaS~re the site, figure the: d°St'o~a~dding a multiple dock, 'ma find°ut what the Shoreline depth f~r th~ next~ meeiing,i Ahrens made the recommendation that thecommissionerS view the site before thenext meeting. :' MOTION BYAhrens to table this issue until the December me.?ting SECONDED BY Funk. Motion carried. .-527- DISCUSs: RE.QUEST FOR REI~E&SE OF'PORTION OF lt~'~NNE, PIN .COUNTY TAX FORFEII~D PARCEL-(LOTS 14-15) Fackler gave a brief background on this issue, and displayed aerial photogr'aphs of' the property. He stated that the applicant actually has a dock at the location, through the Docks Program. . All the other docks in this area are privately oxvned. He also stated that this property is not considered accessible as a public right-of- way, and most 'likely would be deemed inaccessible. However, this area is counted in the LMCD. Hanus asked whether this water is navigable or not and whether or not there is vaIidity to the DCAC even having a dock at the site. He was informed by Fackler and Eurich that this is indeed a navigable waterway: Ooldberg then asked if they ever want to let go of a dock for the lineal footage of the Docks Program. Hanus stated there is excess, lineal footage as there is.~ Ooldberg then asked what the pros ' -m---d~f re~a~ihg this pr0pe~y were. Han~ ~v~a~s ~ilat if the City deems this a.~.u..seable dock site, thenChe city is responsible for keeping it navigable. He also stated that the applicant &uid file a claim for the city to do this at a 9ost of $50,000 00 or more. Ahrens stated that the storm water issue was taken care of in 1995,'but that it remains a storm water issue, not a dock issue. Hanus asked when the street was vacated as that may have an impact on this issue. No information was readily available. The property is land-locked. Ahrens stated that if you look at this issue from a dollar sense,.releasing the property would creaie more revenUe than the dOck fee. M~TIO~BY Goldberg to recommend to the. ¢ouncii that.the DCAC'djltt '~aot have a problem with them voting either way Oh: this issue. SECONDED BY Funk. In discussion, Ahrens disagreed with the motion, stating that the DCAC needed to make a decision one way or another Goldberg stated.he would withdraw his motion. Was told he did not need to withdraw it, just amend it. G01dberg then stated he would amend his motion to say they would release the property. Ahrens agreed. MOTIO~ BY Ahr~ns to irelease the property. SECONDED BY Gotdberg. In discussion, Funk asked why the~ sh0tdd rel~se the Property. AhfenS stated that the i.a~d ~'ann°t"¢e used :by the publiC, so its rea[lf o~i~/Ug:elbie by the .applica?: ~e% atso stat~d"~ha£ the Cl'~: ~oUld derl:ve b:etter U~e Of'the Property ~y' puttff/g ii~ badk on the t~ Foley. ~-al~6 staed that' it~ i;hi~ 6iS~ihi6h th~(any time you can put forfeited property back on the tax roles, the better. Motion passed Wi{h a vote of 5 yes and I no. -528- 6. DISCUSS: RIP RAP LOCATIONS: Fackler referred to his October 8, 2002 memo which stated that due to high water levels on Lake Minnetonka, staff is not recommending any specific sites for the 2003 rip-rapping. Fackter also stated that the 2002 rip-rapping projects which are completed as far as the $20,000..00 allotted would allow. $30,000,00 .has been set adde until the ~pring o~' ~00~ when stat~ can evaluate what other dp-rapping needs to be done. MOTION BY Funk to table this issue and reassess it in the spring. SECONDED BY Goldberg, MOTION carried. ge DISCUSS: REQUEST TO PURCI:IASE PRINTER Fackler stated the GPS system that staff was intending to purchase was unsatisfactory, so there is still $400.00 remaining in the budget. Fackler requested that $250.00 be set aside to purchase a printer for Katie Heft, Docks InspectOr. Hanus stated Hoffwould be getting a pretty nice printer for that amount of money. Heft stated she had not done any research on that as yet, but was very sure the final cost would be under $250.00. MOTION BY Jones to purchase a printer SECONDED BY Funk. Motion carried. DISCUSS: MULTIPLE DOCKS/SI,IPS ISSUES .Fackler gave a brief background on Centerview Beach and Beachside North as possible new mukiple dock.site locations. Parking remains a problem at Centerview. Fackter had drawn up diagrams of the current docks.~, d fUture docks at Centerview. Commission decided to concentrate on Centerview Beach at this time. Fack!er will work with the LMCD and come back to the Commission with fUrther information at the December meeting. Beachside North will be discussed in the fUture ~W: 2002 SEASON FINAL REPORT Goldberg sta~ed that he really liked the summary. Katie brought up the issue of shares with no boats. MOTION by Funk to bring this issue back in December SECONDED by Eurich. Motion Carried. -529- REVIEW: BUDGET RECOMMENDATION FOR USE OF DOCIC FUND Goldberg requested this item be introduced here, as he had to leave the meeting early. Commission agreed. Discussion followed on wording of Budget Recommendation written by Goldberg. Changes were noted. Final copy will. be typed up by Secretary and brought by Fackler to the City Council Budget meeting on Monday, November 25, 2002. MOTION by Goldberg to accept the final wording of the Budget Recommendation For Use of Dock Fund SECONDED by Ahrens. Motion carried. 10. 11. 12. * Goldberg left the meeting at 9:34pm. Chair Funk noted that time was running out and there were still several items on the agenda to be discussed. MOTION by Funk to continue the meeting for another 30 minutes, until 10:30, SECONDED by Jones. Motion carried. DISCUSS: 2003 DOCK LOCATION MAP CHANGES Moved to December meeting. DISCUSS: 2003 FORMS Hoff recommended instead of stating "Owner (paying fee for renter)" that "paying fee for renter" be deleted and simply state "Owner". Owners of a rental property cannot apply for a dock for their renters. The renters have to apply. Hoff also stated she wants to change "Summer Resident" on both the application and i/V'aiting List forms to help distinguish between snowbirds and others who claim to be summer residents. It was agreed to delete "Summer Resident" and add the words "Winter mailing address if different from above" on both forms. It was agreed that a clean-up of the program needs to take place by declaring that shares have to be permanent residents of the City of Mound. The ordinance may have to be changed to reflect this. Hoff also recommended that shares have a boat. Commission was in agreement on this issue also as you don't have to be in the Docks Program to go on a dock and fish. These two issues will be discussed at the December meeting. DISCUSS: 2003 DOCK/SLIP FEES Fackler stated staff is looking to approve a 15% Senior discount, increase the Share fee, raise the 21 day temporary boat docking fee to $40.00, and get that fee and the unregistered boat penalty fee of $25.00 more in sync. -530- concern that the Share fee not show a marked increase. Agreement made t c raise the Share fee to $100.00. Agreement made to raise the docking fee to $40.00. During the discussion on the penalty fee, it was discovered that it is preserttly $25.00 a day, although it is not worded as such on the fee schedule: Oeneral consensus was to keep it at $25.00 a day, and word it as such on the fee schedule. MOTION by Jones for the share holder fee to increase to $100.00 and the Other changes as proposed; Senior discount at 15%, 21 day temporary boat docking fee to increase to $40.00, and the unregistered boat penalty fee to stay at $25.00 a day for the year 2003. SECONDED by Funk. Motion carried. 13. DISCUSS: 2003 BUDGET SHEET/EXPENDITURES/INCOME HanuS stated he disputes the figure of $6,500.00 on pg. 67 under #307 Admin/Computer Charge and will be discussing this with Gino Businaro at the upcoming City Council budget meeting. Further discussion was tabled until the December meeting. MOTION by Funk to adjourn the meeting at 10:34 SECONDED by Eurich. Motion carriedl -531 - 5341 lVisywood Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 STAFF .REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council, planning Commission and Docks and Commons Advisory CommissiOn FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 2, 2002 SUBJECT: Request for release of Portion of Hennepin County tax-forfeited parcel (Lots 14-15) APPLICANT:. Mike Kramer Commission, Parks and Open Space LOCATION: Adjacent to property located at 5500 Breezy Road PI]): 13-117-24-23.0053 ZONING: K-1 Single-Family Residential ,COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY Mike Kramer has submitted a request to the City of Mound to consider release of a Henn~pin County tax-forfeit parcel (Lots 14-15) which is located behind his property at 5500 Breezy Road. It is City staff' s understanding that he would like to purchase the two (2) lots as he currently has a private dock located on the property. REVIEW PROCEDURE There is no formal review process in the City Code that deals With tax-forfeit properties. However, a 1997 in-house policy created an informal procedure to respond to such reque'sts which requires review by City staff and the Planning Commission and the Park Commissio'n. Additionally, a 1984 resolution established a policy regarding payment of assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit properties prior to forfeiture. Copies of both documents have been included as attachments. With regards to this particular request, City officials and commission members are advised that it is also being forwarded to the DCAC as it involves lakeshore proPerty and is currently part of the City's dock program. -532- BACKGROUND INFORMATION Parcel Information. Size: Legal Description: 64,620 SF (1.48 acres) Lots 14-22, Block 1 and Lots 1-3, Block 4 including adjacent vacated streets Address: unassigned Ownership: Hennepin County and held in trust by the City of Mound Property Tax Status: According to Hennepin County, the subject property is vacant and is tax exempt CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire ChiefPederson No comment. Acting Police Chief McKinley No concerns from Police Department. City Manager Hanson The City Manager supports properties not on the tax rolls being combined with adjacent properties except for fire lanes. Public Works Director Skinner City has storm sewer from CSAH 110 and Peabody to Harrison's Bay. Refer to comments from City Engineer John Cameron. Building Official Simoneau No comments. City Engineer Cameron The City has a stormwater pond located on this parcel with an outlet to the channel located in the vacated right-of-way of Peabody Road. However, this outlet is located on Lot 17 which is west of the two lots in question. From an engineering perspective, these lots are not required in order to maintain the existing municipal storm system. 2 -533- Parks Director Fackler This tax parcel is shOreline property and i's counted in the City's Dock Location Map. Comm. Dev. Director Smith In the event the parcel is released and sold by Hennepin County it is possible a "waiver of platting" or minor subdivision will be required. The subject property is deemed to be "non- -J:tnildahled/_2n~~ ~-q~mleaz~,~ix~hould~be only be sold ~o the adjacent property owner(s). It is City staff's understanding that the DNR will be contacted by Hennepin County for formal comment prior to release of any property fronting public waterbodies. 3 -534- -535- Hennepin County Map.Server . ,:. , Hennepin County, 1HN Click on map to view informer}on on adjoinin~~t~ Scroll down to see property address, value:& ~,t~' Page 1 of 1 13-i 17-24-23-0053 ADDRESS. UNASSIGNED MO~, ~ 0 La~up~te:08~2~2at[:00:~ PM Approximate' Property Perimeter 1,264 ~. Market Value Approximate $ $ .oo Click on Property Information Button below to view mai.n tax information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy Of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob MOulder with the Hennepin County Surveyors Office at (612) 348-2618 or email him directly at ~. _ 0ulde. r.@.c~_~_h.~D.9~pir].rnn_,_u..s. The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800x800 screen resolution. This application, requires Interact Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2,01 or later version for proper operation Copyright © 2000 Hennepin Count. y · http://www~9~c~hennepin~mn~us/scripts/esrima~°me=Hennepin&Cmd=~dentify&Left~ 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: ~Additi~_n Name Property ID: 11311.7242.30053 Hermei ia County, Property Information Search Res~ult The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated daily (Monday- Friday) at approximately 9:15 p. rrt. (CST) .......... EarcelD_ata_fo~_Iaxes_Eayable 20.132 13-!17-24-23-0053 85 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED Municipality: MOUND School Dist: 277 Cbn~t~Octiofi year: Property ID: Address: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: 3 Parcel Size: IRREG[ HENNEPIN FORFEITED LAND CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real 'Estate Value and warranted to represent arms4ength transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes &Bounds: Tax Parcel Description LAKE SIDE PARK A L CROCKERS 1ST DIV LOTS 14 THRU 22 BLK 1 AND LOTS 1 THRU 3 BLK 4 INC'L ADJ VAC STREETS Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 · Values Established by. Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total-Tax: Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 -'~ http ://www2. co.hennepin.mn, us/pins/pidresult j Sn%&-t= 1311724230053 · . ' -537- 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page '~ Page 2 of 2 Values: Land Market Building Market IVlachinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total. Limited:. Qualifying Improvements Classifications: · Property Type VACANT LAND '' RES DENT AL H~est~d sta~s ~h~, HOMESTEAD Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status EXEMPT 813 HennePin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related quest:ion? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.rnn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cot Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati¢ Send e,mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult.j st-"5 ~ -' 311724230053 8/9/2002 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of i Hennopin County, MN .. Click on map to view information on adjoii~ing .properties Scroll down to see. prope .r~y... .. addre_s..~,..v_aLu_e_&.....'.m.._x, hnfg. ....... ~ ...... Pro~arty ID 13-117-24-23-0021 Prope=tYAddress 5500 BREEZY RD MOUND, MN 55364 L~tup~:08~7~0~al:00:00PM A~proximate Property Perimeter 356 ~. Market Value Approximate Property Area 7,781 Sq.ff.= 0.179 acres Total Tax (2002) $ 140,000 $ 1,500.94 Click on Property Information Button below to ¥iew main mx information page for the property you have selected This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of the material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrapresentation of this information or its derivatives. If map discrepancies are found, please contact Bob Moulder with the Hennepin County Sti~veyorS Officeat (612) 348~2618 or email him dli'ectly at .BgJAM_0_u~r.l~co.henne[~in,~n.¢.,~ ............................. , The qual'ity of the dispiay,may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting, and is best viewed at 800×600 screen resolution; This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation Copyrigl~t © 2000 Hennepin CoEnty http ://www 19.co.hennepinTrrrd.us/scripts/esrimaF_~_me=Hennepin&Cmd=!dentify&Left. .. 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page ~::~ Page 1 of 2 Search By: '" Prop~.~ ID! ......... IJ.3. !.~77:,¢~0~~_ ........ Hennepin COunty, vlN Pro e~ormation Search Res~JIt The Hennepm County Property Tax web database is :~pdated daily (Monday - Friday) ai approximately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Property'lD: AddreSs: Mu'niciPality: SchbO:! Dist: watershedi SeWe~ Dist: Own,er Name: .. ~ 'TaXiPa~er Name &Aaa?ess: Parcel Data for Taxes PaYable 20~2 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2002 Tax ~tatement 13-~ 17-24-23-0021 5500 BREEZY RD MOUND 277 ConStructior3 year: 1966 3 Parcel Size: 80 X 10C M & J KRAEMER MICHAEL R & JAN M KRAEMER 5500 BREEZY DR MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information sales prices are repo~ted as' listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and warranted to represent arms-length transactions. Sale Date: March, 1987 Sale Price: $86,200 Transaction Type: Warranty Deed Addition Name: Lot: BlbCk: 001 "' Metes ~& B~tin'ds:. LOTS 32 AN~ '3'3~ TaX Parcel Description :' LAKE sIDE PARK A L CROCKERS 1ST DIV ValUe and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2001 Estimated Market Value: $140,000 Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax:; · Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: $130,600 $130,600 $1,476.05 $24.89 http://www2-co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult.jsl_~5/[~) 2 311724230021 ' 8/9/2002 Property Information Search by ProPerty ID Result page Page 2 of 2 ... Total Tax: $1,500,94 Property information Detail for Taxes Payable 2002 Values Established by Assessor as of Janizary 2, 2001 Val.ues: Land Market $40,000 Building Market $100~000 Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status $140,000 $37,3O0 $93,300 $130,600 RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD 824 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to cor Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopet@co.hennepin.mn:us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati¢ Send e-mail to Henn. Net@co. hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 - 2001 Hennepin County p: 2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult.j,_ 2'1311724230021 8/9/2002 T~ mRFEIT,,,~OPER, TY Hennepin County notifies us of property within the City that has gone tax forfeit because of nonpayment of real estate taxes. They also periodically ask abOUt property we have taken for a public purpose to insure that we are using ii'for that public purpose. The County asks that we inform them of what we would like done with the property i.e., allow the parcels to the sold at public auction; require that'they be sold only to adjoining Property oWners ff they are hndersized or do not meet the zoning and building codes; or retain them for some public purl)ose. There is a considerable amount of research that must be done to determine what should be done with the property. The first step is to go to the tax books and get a property description. Then the property jacket is pulled and its contents examined to see if the property was taken for a public purpose or is a new tax forfeit parcel. The next step is to figure the square footage of the property and look at the current zoning district to determine if it is a buildable lot or not. After all this information is determined, it is ali put on a sheet, a plat map showing the property is made and sent to the City Engineer, Park Director, PubIic Works Superintendent, Building Inspection and Finance Director for their comments and recommendations. Occasionally, an easement is needed for utility purposes; a survey may be needed to determine if part of the property is in the wetlands; or there may be reasons for the City to retain the property. The Special Assessment Clerk in the Finance Dept. determines if there are any assessments from before forfeiture or since forfeiture that need to be put back on the property. The reason we need to know assessments before and since forfeiture is that the City gets 90% of the purchase price to apply to assessments from before forfeiture. The assessments since forfeiture are added in their entirety to the appraised value (determined by the Hennepin.County Assessor) of the property,. The Park Commissission and Planning Commission are then sent the information on the forfeited land for their recommendation. In 1984, the City Council adopted a 'resolution (#84-94, copy attached) setting a policy on assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit property before forfeiture. This has helped to encourage adjoining property owners to purchase undersized parcels and combine them with their property. In 1987 I completed a card index by Property Identification Number for the following: . City oWned property; Tax forfeit property that has been retained by the City for a public purpose; Tax forfeit property that falls into the following categories: -542- Property released for public sale; ProPerty for sale only to and combined with adjoining prope~rty. (what it is, park,' wetlands,, tax forfeit, etc.), whOse name it is'in (State Land Dept. or City of Mound or both), any resolutions dealing with the parcel (resolution number and disposition). I have now completed coordinating the Certificates of Titles, State Deeds, easemen, ts, etc. and recorded that type of information on each card also. This card file, is now complete and is being kept up-to-date. It has already proved, to be a very valuable tool when some. one calls in to check on a parcel of land. Since we started dealing with tax forfeit property in 198.2: 39 parcels have been put up to public aUction; 37 parcels were retained fora public purpose; and 83 parcels have been authorized to be sold to and combined with adjoining properties; 5 temporary construction easements were reconveyed. Of the above, 34 parcels of the 39 have been sold at public auction and 48 of the 79 parcels have been sold to adjoining property owners to be combine with their property. I think this shows how this process is working to the city's advantage to get parcels back on the tax roils and increase conformance to the zoning ordinance. We now have a compUter program called Rapid File and all the information on the cards has been inputted into the computer. 132- June 1~, 1984 RESOLUTION NO. 8~-94 WHEREAS, Henne'pin County has begun to notify adjacent property owners t'hst th'eye, will be conducting "private sales" on undersized or unbui.ldable lOts~; and WHEREAS, some of these properties had assessments against them befOre forfeiture which were cancelled at the time of forefeiture; and WHEREAS, when the City releases these parcels for private sale, it certifies these assessments from before forfeiture to Hennepin County because the City receiVes 80% of the value of the property (selling price) to apply to the old assessments; and ' ' WHEREAS, the asses~menbs since forfeiture are' added to the appraised value so the City receives all the funds for'those assessment's; and .. ~ WHEREAS, some of the assessments from before forfeiture are higher than the property is valued at and thus does not make the property very attractive to adjoining property owners unless we make a committment to them that we will not reassess the remaining balance of the assessments after they purchase the property; and · WHEREAS, the goal is to get the property back on the tax role and help a number of people~make their property conforming. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 'IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following policy which will apply only to undersized tax forfeit lots which are sold thru Hennepin County and combined with adjoining property: On undersized tax forfeit lots which had assessments before forfeiture, the City will certify these assessments to Hennepin County when the lots are released for private sale to adjoining property owners. This will be done only so that the· City will receive 80% of the value of the lot to be applied against these before forfeiture assessments. After certain undersized tax forfeit lots are sold and combined with adjoining property, the owner may petition the City Council to pass a resolution stating that the balance of the assessments from 'before forfeiture will not be recertified to -544- 133 June 12, 1984 Hennepin County for collection. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Charon, Jessen, Paulsen and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Councilmember Peterson was absent and excused. Mayor Attest: City Clerk 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director / Matt Simoneau, Building Official DATE: January 21, 2003 SUBJECT: SAC Credits - Mueller / Lansing Building SUMMARY As the City Council is aware, the building located at 2240-2244 Commerce Boulevard (Mueller Lansing) is to be acquired and demolished as part of the CSAH 15 road reconstruction project that is tentatively scheduled to begin later this year. As stated in the letter from the MCES dated January 14, 2003, there are (44) SAC credits on the property which will be assigned to the City of Mound but can be transferred for any business that will be relocated as a result of the project upon approval by the City Council. Any remaining credits are available for use at the City's discretion. As of this date, City staff is aware that Home Laundry and Scotty B's Restaurant are relocating to other locations within the City and therefore these credits should be transferred. Any remaining credits should be retained by the City of Mound and used for upcoming public projects (ie. Public Safety Building.) RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the following SAC credits from the MCES be transferred as follows: Home Laundry Scotty B' s (formerly D'Vinci' s) City of Mound / HRA 35 8 1 -546- Metropolitan Council Building communities that work January 14, 2003 Environmental Services Matt Simoneau Building Inspector City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1627 Dear Mr. Simoneau: The Metropolitan COuncil Environmental Services Division has determined SAC credits for the properties to be demolished at 2240-224.4 Co,.,m'nerce Blvd. within the City of Mound. It is the Council's understanding that this property will not be redeveloped as it is part of a road reconstruction project (CSAH 15). This project should be credited 44 SAC Units, as determined below. The credits may be taken city-wide on your monthly SAC report, when this demolition occurs, since there will be no new use on this site. Since these credits will be taken city-wide, it is up to the discretion of the city on how to use them. The city may use these credits to pay for SAC for any of the businesses that will be relocated due to this demolition. Credits: Dvinci's (paid 12/87) 60 seats ~ 8 seats/SAC Unit Home Laundry (6/86) Brinkley's (retail) 3580 sq. ft. ~ 3000 sq. ft./SAC Unit SAC Units 7.50 35.00 1.19 Total Credit: 43.69 or 44 If you have any questions, call me at 651-602-1113. Sincerely, Jodi 4. Edwards Staff Specialist Municipal Services Section JLE: 030114S5 CC: S. Selby, MCES Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, City of Mound www.metrocouncll.org Metro Info Line 602-1888 230 East Fifth Street · St. Paul, Minnesota 55 I0 ]_ 547- (65 ~) 602-1005 · Fax 602-1138 · TI'Y 29 1-0904 CITY OF MOUND STREET CONSTRUCTION AND RECONSTRUCTION POLICIES INDEX 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. PURPOSE GENERAL DEFINITIONS COUNTY ROADS MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS MAJOR STREETS LOCAL STREETS ASSESSMENT POLICIES ASSESSMENT FORMULAS DRAFT VERSION 3 4 1 1/10/03 ~d06/0g -548- 1.01 o 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 ge 3.01 PURPOSE The purpose of policies is to establish a guideline and procedures for the construction and reconstruction of streets within the City of Mound. GENERAL This policy relates to roadway improvements eligible to be assessed under authorization of Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429. Three basic criteria must be satisfied before a particular parcel can be assessed. They are: The land must have received special benefit from the improvement. The amount of the assessment must not exceed the special benefit. The assessment must be uniform in relation to the same class of property within the assessment area. Assessable roadway improvement projects shall conform with the procedural requirements of Chapter 429 which generally are as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Project Initiation by Petition or Council Resolution Resolution Ordering Preparation of Engineers Report Resolution Approving Engineers Feasibility Report and Ordering a Hearing Publication and Individual Notification of Hearing Public Hearing Resolution Ordering Improvement Resolution Ordering the Preparation of Assessment Roll Public Notice of Hearing on Assessments Assessment Hearing Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll Filing of Assessments with Hennepin County In addition to special assessments, other sources of funds are available to the City for street purposes, depending on the type of project involved. DEFINITIONS The City of Mound contains various type of roadways. Descriptions of the City's street classifications are outlined as follows: Thoroughfares These are important traffic mutes which provide community continuity and interconnect the City with neighboring communities. They are usually spaced at one mile intervals, although they may be closer in more heavily developed areas. When upgraded these roadways will DRAFT VERSION 3 4 2 1/10/03 12/06/02 -549- 4.01 4.02 4.03 generally have 80'-100' rights-of-way and be of sufficient design to handle anticipated traffic. Collectors Streets which are designed to collect traffic from individual properties and feed into thoroughfares. They have 60-80' rights-of-way with 7 or 9 ton capacity and are generally spaced at one-half mile intervals. Local Relatively short streets which provide access to individual lots in interior areas of development. Minimum right of way is 30-60'. Cul-de-sac Dead-end streets usually designed with a maximum length of 500' and a turn around area of 30'-80' diameter at the property line. They generally are constructed in interior residential developments. Service Road Streets which run parallel and adjacent to a high volume roadway. They are designed to serve individual properties along streets where it is desirable to control access. Alley Roadways which are generally 12-20 feet in right-of-way width which service properties on the rear property line. COUNTY ROADS The county roads in Mound are: CSAH 15 (Shoreline Boulevard and Lynwood Boulevard) CSAH 110 (Commerce Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard) CSAH 44 (West Edge Boulevard) CSAH 125 (Wilshire Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard) The total mileage of County Roads in Mound is approximately 7-1/4 miles. These roads were originally designed as part of the County's highway system and were meant to link rural areas with the urban centers. As Mound developed, these roads have become an important part of the network of City streets. However, many of these County roads need to be upgraded in order to facilitate present and future traffic demand. Since this type of improvement is needed in part because of increased urban use it has been the County policy to share the cost of the project with the City. Costs shared in this manner include: 2. 3. 4. Right-of-way Acquisition Curb and Gutter Traffic Controls Storm Drainage Payment of the City portion of projects costs may be assessed and/or paid by City funds. DRAFT - VERSION 3 4 3 1/10/03 1-2d06/0~ -550- 5. MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS 5.01 Regulations allow a municipality to designate up to 20% of its existing street mileage, excluding County State Aid Highways and State Trunk Highways as MSA streets. The City of Mound currently has approximately 8 miles designated as MSA streets. The City receives MSA funds on an annual basis which are allotted for maintenance and construction of MSA streets. This money is part of the gasoline tax collected in Minnesota and is apportioned to the community according to state guidelines based on population and road needs. Maintenance funds are sent automatically to the City each year while the construction funds are held in an account by the State until such time construction contracts are awarded. 5.02 The following are MSA streets: Street Tuxedo Boulevard Three Points Boulevard Lynwood Boulevard Fairview Lane Grandview Boulevard Bartlett Boulevard Wilshire Boulevard Cypress Lane Maywood Road Hidden Vale Lane Brighton Boulevard Highland Boulevard Idlewood Road Ridgewood Road Auditors Road Belmont Lane Leslie Road Devon Lane Bradford Lane From Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Lynwood Boulevard Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15) Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Bartlett Boulevard Maywood Road Cypress Lane Maywood Road Tuxedo Boulevard Bartlett Boulevard (CSAH 110) Highland Boulevard Idlewood Road Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Brighton Boulevard Leslie Road Devon Lane To Minnetrista Border Glen Elyn Road Fairview Lane Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Hidden Vale Lane Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Idlewood Road Ridgewood Road West Edge Boulevard (CSAH 44) Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15) Lynwood Boulevard Devon Lane Bradford Lane Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125) Cottonwood Lane Maywood Road Non-Existent Roads on MSA System Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) Belmont Lane Cypress Lane 5.03 It is not the intent of the State Aid Funding Program to totally finance the MSA system. Rather, it is designed to assist communities with street construction projects in an effort to improve the roadway system statewide. Therefore, when an MSA street is constructed or upgraded, assessments will be levied in accordance with the policies for major streets. The assessment rate will reflect the benefit conveyed by the improved design, additional width, DRAFT - VERSION 3 4 4 1/10/03 12/06/02 -551 - e 6.01 6.02 7.01 7.02 7.03 7.04 and curb and gutter, and these rates will be set by the City Council on recommendation of the City Engineer. MAJOR STREETS Major streets are considered by the City of Mound to be collector and thoroughfare streets. Streets of this variety generally service local traffic as well as traffic from other areas and therefore are designed in accordance with standards of a higher road capacity. Major streets within the City of Mound are constructed with a minimum capacity of 9 ton per axle. The primary source of funding for major roadways is special assessments and MSA funds. New and reconstructed major streets shall be constructed with curb and gutter. Street width shall be determined by existing conditions, traffic counts and patterns, and, if applicable, MSA standards. LOCAL STREETS Local Streets are generally streets which service a small area and do not typically involve a movement of traffic between areas. Local streets typically connect two collector streets or county roads. Streets of this type include streets, cul-de-sacs, and service roads. Local streets within the City of Mound are constructed with a minimum capacity of 5 tons per axle. The primary source of funding of local streets is special assessments. New local streets shall be constructed with curb and gutter. Reconstructed local streets will include concrete curb and gutter in the following instances: All streets with existing concrete curb and gutter or existing vertical asphalt curb. All Municipal State Aid streets. Local streets without existing curb and gutter. The new unobstructed street width for new local streets (back to back of curb) is 28 feet. Local streets shall be reconstructed at current width (unless a wider street is desired by the affected residents) but not less than twenty-four feet (24') unless the Council finds that: A twenty-four foot (24') width would adversely affect trees or other significant or desirable physical features: and The existing width does not Constitute a distinct hazard to life or property. The current width provides for safe access of emergency vehicles, snow storage requirements, aesthetics, and, to the extent relevant, availability of parking. Streets which are over twenty-eight feet (28') in width may have parking allowed on both sides. Streets that are twenty-eight feet (28') or less in width will be subject to parking DRAFT - VERSION 3 4 5 1/10/03 -lg/06,t0:2 -552- 8.01 8.02 8.03 8.04 8.05 8.06 restrictions on one side. Parking restrictions could be established at the time of street projects or at any future date based upon general City parking requirements. Factors to be considered shall include, but not be limited to, staff report regarding safety and emergency vehicles access and neighborhood input. Where streets are less than twenty-eight (28') in width, the staff shall assist the neighborhood in identifying areas where existing street width can be increased to provide additional parking. ASSESSMENT POLICIES When assessments are levied for roadway improvements on single fo,,m, residential property the assessment will be calculated in accordance with the formulas set forth in the section on Assessment Formulas, using a u Unit pa Method. The per u Unit Method assessment will apply equally to all single fmmi!y residential land within the improvement area. For duplexes and single family residential property a A "unit" means an area of land which is capable of being independently developed under the subdivision and zoning regulations in effect at the time of the assessment. For multiple family residential property, the number of units will be determined by multiplying the number of actual residential units on the property by 0.75. Commercial, and industrial property aad-mul6- ......co,,,a,~ parcels shall be assessed using the e Combination' · 4=~,,, ...... foot, ~ea ~,~o-'a mnit m Method. The ~ Unit m Method will be used for assessment purposes on single fmmi!y residential property unless the City Council in its discretion determines that a different formula will more equitably apportion the assessment among the benefiting properties. The total project costs for streets constructed or reconstructed in any given project shall be equal to the actual construction cost, plus associated costs such as legal, fiscal, administrative and engineering. When the City CONSTRUCTS or pays a share of the cost for A NEW LOCAL OR MAJOR STREET, 100% of the total City projects-costs, including all utilities, will be recovered by assessing the benefiting property for actual benefit received. A new street shall be defined as a roadway including curb and gutter which had not previously existed. When the City RECONSTRUCTS AN EXISTING LOCAL STREET, 2/3 of the total project costs will be recovered by assessing the benefiting property for benefit received. The remaining 1/3 shall be absorbed by the City. A reconstructed street shall be defined as a roadway which existed previously. The addition of concrete curb and gutter when it did not previously exist will be assessed separately at 100% of the cost. When the City RECONSTRUCTS or pays a share of the cost for A MAJOR STREET or reconstruction is partially financed by State Aid Funds to improve the design and capaCity, the adjoining properties will be charged an assessment equal to 2/3 of the cost of an average DRAFT - VERSION 3 4 6 1/10/03 -553- 8.07 8.08 local street reconstruction for a 28 foot wide street. Provided, however that existing single ._.~.jco~'~-' residential property abutting two or four-lane divided median roads will be assessed based on 1/2 of the cost of a standard 28 foot wide local street as if built at the time of the assessment. The remainder to be paid by State Aid Funds or other City Funds. The following items without limitation are to be assessable as part of a reconstruction project cost:* 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Remove concrete curb and gutter Remove concrete pavement Remove/replace concrete steps Construct and reinforce concrete steps Remove concrete driveway pavement Remove/construct apron 6" thick concrete pavement (residential) Remove/construct apron 8" thick concrete pavement (commercial) Common excavation Core excavation Construct concrete C & G Design B-618 or surmountable Saw joint in concrete Adjust manholes Adjust catch basin Adjust gate valves Retaining wall Electric conduit Surfacing aggregate Class 5 100% crushed Cultured sod with 4" thick topsoil in place Clearing Grubbing Aggregate backfill Replacement of driveway aprons Construct concrete pedestrian ramps Full-depth asphalt milling and overlay Pavement reclamation Turf restoration The following items may be billed directly or assessed to the property owner requesting said work:* 2. 3. 4. Sewer and water service line repairs Random 6-8" concrete pavement Random concrete sidewalk Bituminous driveway replacement DRAFT - VERSION $ 4 7 1/10/03 !2/~a~/02 -554- 8.09 The following items will be paid at City expense when part of a reconstruction project:* 3: 4. Remove, replace or relocate hydrants Install hydrants and/or gate valves Sanitary sewer and watermains repair and replacement Storm sewer reconstruction or construction *Items may be modified to conform to cooperative agreements with the County for individual projects. 9. ASSESSMENT FORMULA 9.01 Unit Method - The per u Unit m Method of assessment is intended to simplify the process by assuming that all properties to be assessed will receive equal benefit. When the per u Unit m Method is used, the individual parcel assessment will be calculated as follows: ASSESSMENT Total Assessable Project Cost Total Units Corner lots which are not divisible into separate units will only be assessed one unit. If the two streets are reconstructed at different times, the comer parcel shall be assessed one-half unit for each project if it has two frontages or one-third if it has three frontages. 9.02 Combination Method - When the c Combination frep2 feet, area ~d unit m Method is used, the individual parcel assessment shall be calculated as follows: 30 percent of the total cost to be assessed based on front footage. Corner lots shall be calculated to include all front footage (front and sides). All lots shall be deemed to have at least a minimum of 40 front feet. ASSESSMENT 30% of Assessable Project Cost x Assessable Front Total Assessable Front Footage Footage of Lot 30 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on the square footage of the property to be assessed. ASSESSMENT = 30% of Assessable Project Cost x Assessable Area Of Lot Total Assessable Area 3. 40 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on a unit basis. ASSESSMENT = 40% of Assessable Project Cost Total Units DRAFT - VERSION 3 4 8 1/10/03 lg/O6/0g -555- 9.03 o 3.& o !0. When using the Combination Method fe-'znu!a cenmined ;" 9.02, the following are additional factors to be considered: ,.,~- ..... ;.,g t~, .... ~,;,,ot;,,., 4:,^,,t +',,,,t ...... A ".knit Lots will be assessed for all street frontages being improved. T ,-,.o ,ho, r-,.,-,,-,+ ,.,,.,, o Ce",.k".~' Dr`oA o,,A ,~ ot,-,~,~, ;,.,,p ........ t ..,,,,;11 1., .... ,~oo,~A ,-,,, fha g23~'P~C A-ma-of Any land formerly considered to be under public control that has subsequently been recognized as cemmens ord ne,;: under private ,, ...... ;,;p, t^ will be assessed as ,-~,-~ ef the private property. rot any tract of lana in common ownership (indua~g single parcel, eom~inea parcel or separate parcels), a "unit" means an area of lana which is ~apaUe of ~eing in&pen&ntly aevelopea unaer the su~aivision ana zoning regulations in effect at the time of the assessment. Single lots under separate ownership from adjacent property that do not meet the area requirements for a buildable site will be assessed only area and footage. th,.. o.~,-,..=. 1~0o;o ao ..,Th,=.,. lr`+o ,~vr.,,.,-,.~ Th,=. ,-,.~,-o.~1 ;,-, ,,,h;~.h th,,. ,,-.-,,.o,-.,,. ;~. 1.-,,..-,*:.A ,,,411 n.-,+ ,-.~r.~;.,,a Lots that front on more then one street will be assessed one unit for each street frontage improved o o*~* *r` ~-~ ;reproved o.A .,n;~, ..... ; .... ; .... ;A ~ ~,n ......... * ~" ~ethef DRAFT VERSION 3 4 9 1/10/03 ~06/0-~ -556- !2. !3. !4. !5. !6. !7. 6. 9.04 the Any other factors which the council believes will result in a more equitable assessment. In certain unusual cases assessments may be determined by a "fair" comparison to other assessed property. This will be recommended by the City Engineer and approved by the City Council. s:\main:\mou13276\Reports\street reconstruction policies-version4 DRAFT VERSION 3 4 10 1/10/03 12/06/02 -557- January 24, 2003 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: 2003 Street Reconstruction Project Feasibility Report MFRA #14121 Dear Mayor and Council Members: As requested, we are submitting a Preliminary Engineering Report for the proposed reconsmaction of certain streets in the Three Points area of Mound. If you have any questions, or need additional information on anything in this report, we will be pleased to discuss this further with you at your convenience. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth s:\main :\mou 14121 \reports\coverletter 1-23 -558- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted December 10, 2002, a report has been prepared by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. with reference to the 2003 Street Reconstruction Project, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $390,800. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 11th day of February, 2003, in the council chambers of City Hall at 7:30 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of January, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -559- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, January 22, 2003 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · 36th Annual "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner, 2/13/03 at Lord Fletcher's Old Lake Lodge ', READING OF MINUTES- 1/8/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5. min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will bea~proved in One motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. WATER STRUCTURES A) Terry Nagel, Consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of variance application from Code for side setback requirements plus an adjusted dock use area. B) 5th Street Ventures, LLC (Marina Center site), new multiple dock license application to expand a conforming multiple dock facility from 10 to 13 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 3,120' of continuous shoreline (Public Hearing conducted at 12/18/02 Regular Board Meeting). C) (*) 2003 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2003 renewal without change applications as outlined in 1/16/03 staff memo; D) Additional Business; LAKE USE & RECREATION A) Discussion of density policies on Lake Minnetonka: · 1973 Boat Density Policy Statement · 1991 Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka B) Additional Business; 3. FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (1/16/03 - 1/31/03); B) (*) December financial summary & balance sheet; -560- 4. ADMINISTRATION A) (*) Slaff recommends approval of 2002 Pay Equity as submitted (handout); B) Additional Business; 5. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE 6. SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8, OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10.ADJOURNMENT -561 - D AF¥ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, January 8, 2003 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL .......... o ~,~o~,,~. ,~,~ ru~,~, ~uupHavun;'~,~aig ~e~son, Spring Park; Liii McMiiian, Orono; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka Also present: Oharles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd'harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Sheldon Wed, Greenwood; Victoria has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster Foster annoUnced that the 36th Annual "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner was scheduled for Thursday, 2/13/03, at Lord F etchers Old Lake Lodge READING OF MINUTES' 12/18/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Babcock moved Nelson seconded to approve the minutes from the 12J18/02 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. Two friendly amendments were recommended by Board members. First, Babcock stated under agenda item lA in the sixth paragraph on page 9, the word "commemial" should deleted and the word "advertising" should be inserted in its place. Second, Foster stated that discussion should be added under the agenda item "Executive Session" regarding compensation adjustment for the Executive Director. A motion was made by Suerth and seconded by Van Hercke to adjust the annual salary of Greg Nybeck 3% from $54,000 to $55,620, retroactive to 11/1/02. Babcock and Nelson agreed to these friendly amendments. VOTE: Ayes (8), Abstained (1, Knudsen); motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS. persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda. There were no comments from persons in attendance on subjects not on the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA. COnSent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests diScusSion of any item, in' which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Seuntjens moved, McMillan seconded to approve.the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include: 2C, 2003 MUltiPle Dock Licenses, Staff recommends approval of 2003 renewal without change applicationS as outlined in 1/2/03 staff memo; 3B, November financial summary and balance sheet; 4A, -562- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page 2 Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Significant ActiVity Report; and 5A, Minutes from the 12/13/02 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. SAVE THE LAKE A. Michael Deering, discussion of 2003 Crystal Pierz Marine Lake Minnetonka Cleanup Event. Foster asked for an overview of the agenda item from staff. Nybeck stated the office recently received a telephone call from Mr. Deering regarding the concept of a Lake Minnetonka clean-up event in 2003, In 2002, he believed that Crystal Pierz Marine coQrdJ~sfuJ divers lake bottom clean-up on Lake Minnetonka and a similar event is planned in 2003. Mr. Michael Deering, Public Relations Consultant for Crystal Pierz Marine, made the fOlloWing commentSl · He thanked the Board for the opportunity to share an idea about preserving the health of the Lake Minnetonka area. He provided background on Crystal Pierz Marine, noting that they are trying to give something back to the community through cause related activitieS. ' · A number of months ago, he contacted Dick OsgoOd from the Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA) regarding the possibility of teaming up with them to do good things for the health of Lake Minnetonka. An event that occurred from these discussions was the divers lake bottom clean~Up this pastAugust. It was a good event that was media friendly and a good outreach to the public. Participants in the event included over 30 divers, sU'pport from Maynai-ds, and both Pdnt and television coverage. There appears to be a lot of interest from the public relating to this type of event ~nd he contacted the District office to get placed on a Board meeting agenda to discuss this event with the Board · It makes a lot of sense for the Lake Minnetonka residents, the buSineSs communitY, and otherparties that have a vested interest to take steps to keep it clean. He clarified that Cry~tal Pierz Madne was not looking for funding of the prop0sedevent frorn the DistriCt; hoWeVer, he b~ ieved th;at it COUld potentially qualify as a "Save the Lake" project if desired by the District. Insteadl he Was seeking support from the 14 member communities to invest in the event in spirit. He compared the proposed event to the national, "Night-Out" event. · He proposed one date annually for clean-up of Lake Minnetonka, noting that June 21st is scheduled in 2003. He encouraged Board members to serve as an informaiion source to get input and support from the member cities that they represent. He requ.ested a list of the 14 Board members so that he could share information on the proposed event with them. · He believed that Lake Minnetonka could set an example of how to establish a sucCessful, annual event as he has described. Donated time and in-kind services are key in making the proposed event successful. · He entertained comments or questions from the Board on the proposed event~ · ~, Foster stated that he believed the Board of Directors concurs that Lake Minnetonka is a treasured natural resource and that steps to keep it clean ShoUi'd be initiated, He' supported the divers clean~up event conducted in 2002 to bring junk and garbage up from the bottom of the lake. He asked for cladficationon how the lakeshOre clean-up project Would occur because~ :t~:e Vast majority of lakeShore is ai~eady developed and being Cleaned uP' the residents that abut the lake. Mr. Mike Mason, LMA Board member, stated that he believed there are a number of wetland and island areas on Lake Minnetonka that are not currentl~ being cieaned Up by residents who have abutting properties. -563- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ~ Eegular Board Meeting ~ '~ January 8, 2003 Page 3 Deering stated that he believed the proposed event is something that most residents are already aware of and deal with; however, it would consolidate it into one symbolic day annually to set an example. Mason stated that he believes that there was a great deal of enthusiasm at the local dive clubs for the lake bottom clean-up in 2002 and that he believed diver participation for this event in 2003 could greatly expand. Van Hercke stated that she supported the proposed project and that she believed it could go over well in the City of Minnetonka because of the close-knit neighborhoods in the Grays Bay and Libbs Lake area. She supported the idea of further educating the public on the need to keep Lake Uinnetonka clean through this proposed event. Foster stated that staff would forward a copy of the Board roster to Deering as he requested, adding that he would forward the information to the City of Deephaven. Babcock stated that he would prefer that the information for the proposed special event come from the office rather than through the Board members. He expressed concern about setting a precedent. Nybeck stated thata quarterly Executive Director Newsletter would be forwarded to the member cities in the near future and that this proposed event could be communicated to them through it. Suerth stated that he believed the proposed event would need a permit from the District. Babcock stated that he believed local rotary clubs would be a good contact because they generally are interested in these types of projects. Nelson stated that the question whether a sanitation company would be willing to donate dumpsters should be investigated. McMillan suggested that Deering might want to consider coordinating their efforts with Gabbriel Jabbour, noting he coordinated a large clean-up effort this past season on Big Island. Babcock suggested that a contact be made with the Minnetonka Power Squadron. Foster thanked Deer ng on behalf of the Board for his efforts on the proposed event, B, Additional Business. There was no additional business. WATER STRUCTURES A. Terry Nagel, variance applicat on from LMCD Code for s de setback requirements plus an adjusted dock use area (Public hearing conducted at 7124102 Regular Board' Meeting), Foster asked for background on this agenda item from staff. Nybeck made the folloWing comments: · Mr, Terry Nagel, 21985 Byron Circle, submitted a variance application on 7/1/02 forBoard cOrisideration for docking in front of his property on St. Albans Bay in the City of Greenwood. The -564- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page 4 application was submitted for variance from Code for side setback requirements and an adjusted dock use area, with a physical hardship of a converging oblique lot line. Other abutting properties potentially impacted by the proposed variance application include Paul and Bonnie Boedecker to the south, 21915 Byron Circle, and Terry Nagel tothe north, 21885 BYron circle. The variance application was ~ubmitted to amend a variance previously approved in 1991 for the applicant's and Boedecker properties. In 1991, Mr. Nagel submitted an application for vadance from Code for side setback requirements for a canopy and an adjusted dock use area at 21895 Byron Circle, with a hardship of converging lot lines that were generally oblique. The Board granted the following variances in 1991 for the properties at 21985 and 21915 Byron Circle: 1) the common extended side site line between the Nagel and Boedecker properties was deflected 23 degrees to the north from the 929.4' lake elevation to allow for docking and storage of watercraft, 2) t-he ~'ommon extended side site line between the two Nagel propedies was deflected 28 degrees to the north to allow for docking and boat storage at the original Nagel site, 3) the request for side setback variances at the Nagel and Boedecker sites for a canopy was denied, and 4) no changes were made to the northern extended side site line extension at the Parris property, currently owned by Nagel, and the southern extended side site line at the Saucier property, currentlY owned by Boedecker. A public hearing was conducted at the 7/24102 Regular Board Meeting for the variance application proposed by Nagel. The applicant submitted the proPoSed variance apPliCation because three conditions that existed in 1991 have changed. They are: 1) the ownership of the two abutting properties of 21985 Byron Circle have changed, 2) Nagel increased the amount of 929.4' shoreline at the 21985 Byron Circle site from 53' to 80' after he purchased the Pards property, and 3) the dock Nagel installed in the spring 2002 was not consistent with the site plan approved, with the 12/4/91 Variance Order. The Board made no decision at this meeting because there were pending issues that still needed to be addressed. The consensus of the Board was to direct staff tO facilitate a working group that would consist of Babcock, Terry Nagel, and the Boedeckers to resolve the pending issues and bring the aPPlication back for further review at a future Regular Board Meeting. An on-site meeting was facilitated on 8/12/02 with the working group. It was obServed that neither Nagel nor Boedecker were in compliance with the 12/4/91 Variance Order and they were encouraged · to make the necessary adjustments to come in to comPliance. Non-Compliance included dock placement and the installation of a canopy at the Nagel site and the installation of a canopy at the Boedecker site. This was documented later in the season in a letter that was sent out to both parties on 10/3/02, requesting them to be in compliance with the 12/4/91 Variance Order by November 1st. The concerns at the Nagel site have been addressed because the seasonal dock was removed for the winter. However, the installation of the canopy at the Boedecker site is not in full compliance. Specifically, the canopy has been removed; however, the necessary poles, rigging, and appurtenances to support the canopy remain and need to be taken down. Mr. Boedecker has indicated that he would take it down himself when ice conditions are safe enough to allow him to do SO, The Boedeckers have expressed concern about the proposed Nagel vadance application at the 8/12/02 meeting and in other conversations. Their concems are outlined in a letter dated 10/2/02. Additionally, their legal counsel, Ado Vande Vegte, submitted his c°mments late this afternoon regarding proposed variance application in a letter:dated 1/8/03. He has requested the opportunity to provide an overview of this letter to the Board. Two Code Sections apply to the variance application submitted for the proposed project. First, Code Section 2.01, subd. 1 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for docking and storage of watercraft. At this site, the authorized dock use area is further defined by the 12/4/9 Variance Order. The proposed site plan documents a 12' side setback from the -565- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page 5 adjusted southern side site line extenSion that Was deflected 23 degrees to the north in 1991. Code requires a 20' minimum side setback requirement from this adjusted side site line extension because there would be a canopy installed at the dock. The apPlicant haS communicated to the office that he would like to amend the proposed site plan so that the northern side site line extension is deflected to the north sufficiently to meet the 20' Side setbaCk for the canopy and the 10' side setback for the dock structure. Nybeck estimated that this would require an 11 degree adjustment rather than the 27 degree adjustment as originally proposed. Additionally, the placement of the northern edge of the permanent dock at the Boedecker site is not consistent with the 12/4/91 Variance Order. Specifically, the dock appears to be skewed to the north and it encroaches into the 10' side setback area established in the 12/4/91 Variance Order. Staff is unsure how to explain this discrepancy; however, it--cYbT-d be because of erroneous drawings submitted in 1991 With the variance application or changes to the dock by the Boedeckers over the years. SeCOnd, Code Section 1'.07 allows the Board to consider applications for vadance from Code, including side setback requirements and adjusted dock use areas, provided the application of Code causes the applicant a practical difficulty or a physical hardship. The Code states that the Board may permit a variance from its requirements, with conditions deemed necessary, provided such variance does not adversely affect the purposes of this ordinance, the public health, safety, and welfare, and reasonable access to or use of the Lake by the public or riparian owners. · Based on his review, he made five recommendations for Board consideration. First, he recommended rescinding the variances granted in the 12/4/91 Variance Order and beginning the whole process over. The current placement of the dock and watercraft storage at the Boedecker site, which is a permanent dock that is not in the approved location, has significant impact on the placement of the dock and storage of watercraft at the abutting Nagel site to the north. Second, he recommended adjusting the placement and storage of watercraft at the Boedecker site to the south so that it complies with minimum side setback requirements for this site, five feet;The current dock appears to maintain a 10' side setback from the southern extended side site line extension and is skewed to the north based on the survey submitted by Nagel. Third, grant the Boedeckers a temporary variance, not to exceed three years, because of the investment made by them in their current permanent dock. The Nagel/Boedecker common side site line eXtension should be deflected during the three year period so that it intersects the nearest comer of the current Boedecker dock. No canopy should be allowed at this site and docking and watercraft storage would need to be contained with the authorized dock use area, with no Watercraft storage on the north side of the Boedecker dock. If the Boedeckers wish to have some adjustment to Code after the three year period, they would need to make an application for variance from Code for Board consideration for a long-term vadance at this site. Fourth, grant the Nagels a temporary variance, not to exceed three years, for the dock structure and canopy as proposed by the applicant because it would comply with Code if the common BoedeckedNagel side site line extension was not deflected to the north to allow for the temporary variance for the Boedeckers. He estimated that this would require a 20 degree deflection to the north rather than 23 degrees as approved in the 1991 Variance Order. No watercraft storage should be allowed on the south Side of the Nagel dock. Fifth, approve an adjusted dock use variance for the Nagel/Nagel common eXtended side site line extension sO that it-COmplies with minimum side setback requirements for both the dock structure and the canoPY. It WOuld require approximately an 11 degree deflection to the north from the 929.4' lake elevation. · He entertained comments or questions from the Board. -566- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page 6 Babcock stated that there has been some dispute in previous discussions regarding the placement of the Boedecker permanent dock on the survey submitted by Nagel. He questioned whether another registered survey had been submitted to address this dispute. Nybeck.stated that another registered survey to address the location of the Boedecker dock had not been submitted. Foster questioned whether it would be appropriate for the Board to allow a canopy at both the Nagel and Boedecker properties if they could agree to that. Babco-ck~tatedlfratlt'i~-l~-~er explicitly prohibited canopies at both of these properties, noting that the canopies installed since 1991 have been illegal. Seuntjens stated that he understood it would be possible for Nagel to have a canopy at the abutting site to the north of Boedecker because his shoreline has increased since 1991. However, he questioned the amount of side setback for the proposed canopy from the adjusted side site line extension, as recommended by staff, and why that might be reduced. Nybeck stated that the Nagel canopy would be approximately 17' from the adjusted side site line he recommended for the Boedecker temporary variance, adding it would 28.5' if the common side site line extension was not deflected to the north. In past variance applications when abutting properties are impacted by adjusted dock use areas, the Board has considered longer docks and side setback variances. Seuntjens questioned how the proposed dock at the first Nagel site would impact the dock installed at the second Nagel site. He also questioned whether there was a residence at the second Nagel site because he wanted the Board to ensure that a dock could be installed at the second Nagel residence. Mr. Terry Nagel, 21985 Byron Circle, stated that there is a home on the second site and that a dock has been installed in recent years. Van Hercke asked Nybeck for clarification on why he recommended no canopy at the Boedecker site associated with the temporary variance. Nybeck stated that the Boedeckers have less than 50' of shoreline at their site and that it would nearly impossible to meet the 20' minimum side setback required by Code for the dock they currently have installed. He questioned whether the Board would approve the current Boedecker dock installation if this was an entirely new application, adding that he wou d recommend moving the dock as far to the south as allowed by Code for minimum side setback requirements. Babcock stated that the Boedecker dock was illegal prior to the granting of the 1.991 Variance Order because it was installed over the common extended side site line they have with Nagel. Some of the material facts have changed since 1991. The previous owners of the Boedecker property'did not make application for variance, Instead, both the Board and Mr. Nagel made come concessions at that time to allow the Boedecker permanent dock to continue. McMillan stated that she would like to be cognizant of the Board decision in 1991 and maintain the 23 degree deflection of the common Nagel/Boedecker extended side site line extension to the north. -567- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page7 Seuntjens asked what property was to the south of the Boedeckers. Nybeck stated that the property to the south of the Boedeckers was the Nedegaard twinhomes, adding that they are required to have a 20' side setback from the common side site line extension they have with the Boedeckers. Babcock stated that both Nagel and Boedecker were in non-compliance with the 1991 Variance Order in 2002. He suggested that the Board limit its discussion to possible solutions rather than focussing on what occurred in 2002. F~er asked Babcock if he h-~-d any suggestions on possible solutions. Babcock stated that he generally concurred with the recommendation from staff because a number of material facts have changed substantially since 1991. The question is whether the Board should come up with a temporary or long-term solution, He stated that the one question he believed needed to be addressed was how to deal with the canopy request at the first Nagel site. The Board could require him to meet the 20' minimum side setback requirement or it could provide him some relief through a side setback vadance because the adjustment of the Nagel/Boedecker common side site line extension is reducing his potential dock use area. Seuntjens stated that his preference would be to require a 20' side setback for the canopy at the Nagel site from both side Site line eXtensions, Babcock stated that he understood the comments of Nybeck that the Board might want to consider granting a side setback variance for the canopy from the Nagel/Boedecker adjusted side site line extension because it would meet a 28,5' side setback if this common side site line was not adjusted by the Board. He believed that a case coUld be made for this. LeFevere reminded the Board that the recommendation from staff was for a three-temporary variance for this aspect of the Nagel variance request. Babcock stated that it might make sense to find a permanent solution rather than a temporary solution. McMillan stated that she would like to define dock use areas at these two sites and then decide on whether to allow for canopies, Mr. Arlo Vande Vegte, legal counsel for Boedeckers, commented on the proposed Nagel variance application: · He apologized for the lateness of his comments; however, he encouraged the Board to review them prior tO making a decision. He encouraged the Board to focus its attention on the factual information. · In 1992, the Beedeckers purchased their property with the permanent dock as depicted on the Nagel. survey, clarifying that no changes have occurred to it over the years. Two changes have occurred that shodid be considered by the Board. First, the Nagels purchased the property to. the nOrth of their original property, making it easier to move their dock to the north. Second, a dispute arose this past spdng regarding the placement of the Nagel dock. His clients contacted Distdct staff and worked through the complaint process. -568- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting JanUary 8, 2003 page8 He commented on the location of the Boedecker dock on the survey submitted by Nagel. The location of his clients dock has not changed; however, it was not properly reflected on the site plan associated with the 1991 Variance Order. To Comply with the intent of 1991 Variance Order, it would have required a 37 degree deflection rather than the 23 degree as documented. He believed that the Board should address this because this was the intent of the Board in 1991 to have 20' of separation between the docks. Additionally, the Nagels have greater flexibility to move their dock to the north. He believed that moving his clients extended side Site line to the south Would only compound their problems. The legal standards for granting a variance is that the applicant needs to document that they do not ~s to move the dock to the south so that they have an unobstructed view of their lakeshore. He believed that there was not a need to move the dock further to the south towards his clients because it would result in further burden on them. He requested that the Board carefully compare the current variance request with the intent of the Board in 199t, adding that he believed this would result in a 37 degree adjustment of the Boedebker/Nagel side Site line extension to the north rather than 23 degrees. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Babcock stated that the 23 degree adjustment and the 10 side setback requirements made by the Board in 1991 were based on bisecting the right angles in the water for both sites. He questioned whether the Board in 1991 Would have concluded to a 37 degree adjustment as proposed by the Vande Vegte just because it was an illegal dock structure. It might be possible that the Board WOuld have required the Sauciers to remove the dock in 1991 rather than granting them a variance. Van~]e Vegte stated that might have happened; however, he believed the Board should focus on the spirit and intent of the 1991 Variance Order. He questioned what physical hardship the Nagels have for the proposed variance application. Babcock stated that he believed the Nagels would not have a physical hardshiP if the extended side site line for the Boedeckers were not adjusted to the north. Because the extended side site line was adjusted for the Boedecker site, he believed that it makes it more difficult for the Nagels to comply with minimum side setback requirements. Vande Vegte stated that he believed the Nagels could move the dock to the north so that it meets the 20' side setback from his clients site and then waive the side setback requirements to the north because the Code allows him to do so. McMillan questioned whether it would be appropriate to assume that the Nagels should greatly reduce the dock use of their second property just because they purchased it from the Richard Paris since 1991. She belieVed that: the variances granted bY the Board in 1991 were reasonable because the two lots in question appear to be pie-shaped. Th~ spidt and intent of the 1991 variance Order still exists and she believed that it might not be possible for all property owners in this area to enjoy a canoPy. She Concluded that she .would like to preserve as many elements of the 199i Variance Order as pOSsible. Foster asked Vande Vegte whether his clientS agreed with the details of their dock on the survey submitted by Nagel. -569- Lake Minnetonka Conservation .District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page 9 Vande Vegte stated that his clients are willing to agree with the factual information on the survey submitted by Nagel, although they question whether it was registered. He questioned whether there is a need to require his clients to move their dock further to the south. He stated that he did not believe the additional land purchased by the Nagels since 1991 should not give them additional rights. McMillan stated that she supported the concept requiring a 20' wide setback area for the Nagels from their adjusted side site line extensions. Seuntjens stated, that it was unfodunate that the Board in 1991 did not have the current Nagel survey that documents the necessary details for, the Board to make an informed decision on the requests for variance. Fle--b-~li~-~l-t~a-f~his survey were-~/a-~a5~-1~9-9~-B-~Fe~-~-d~¥fl~j~-di~er~-~i~s~n~ There is a need to take into consideration the 1991 Variance Order when considering the proposed variance application; however, the same decision might not have been made in the present because of an erroneous drawing submitted in 1991. He believed that this was an opportunity to revisit the issues and he asked for the clarification of the condition of the permanent dock at the Boedecker property. Mr. Paul Boedecker, 21915 Byron Circle, stated that the dock was installed when he and his wife purchased the property in 1992 and that he believed that it was relatively good shape. NybeCk stated that the pilings at the Boedecker dock are much smaller that the pilings at other commercial dOcks around the lake that are considered permanent. Seuntjens stated that he asked this questiOn because staff has proposed a temporary variance at the B0edecker site and the removal of the dock. Babcock stated that he believed that although the pilings and decking for the Boedecker permanent dock have generally remained the same since 1991, there have been some minor changes in the width of the dock on both thenorth and south sides of the dock. Boedecker clarified that a one foot walkway was added to the south side of the dock and that no changes have been made to the north side. Babcock stated that he believed the size of the dock on the Boedecker site has gotten larger over time and that the 10' side setback approved in 1991 seems to make sense. Seuntjens expressed concern about beginning the whole variance process over because he believed that there are merits with the 1991 Variance Order. However, he questioned whether it would be appropriate to impdse additional hardShip on the second Nagel site because it is a separate property that might be sold in the future, Babcock stated that it Seems to make sense to maintain the 23 degree adjustment to the north of the Nagel/Boede~ker common extended Side site line. and to provide relief for both parties for side setback requirements from this line. Foster asked Nagel to comment on the point made by Vande Vegte that the pdmary purpose of the side setback variance for the canopy is to maintain views of'hiS shoreline. Nagel made the following comments: -570- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Eegular Board Meeting January 8, :2003 Page '10 · He stated that he would prefer not to explain his reasons for the preposed variance application; however, he is not interested obstructing the view of the Boedeckers with his canopy. · The dock installation in 2002 was a mistake on his part. The dock installed at the Boedecker site was installed slightly to the north in 1991 because of the location of the Cochrane's Boat'yards docks that made it difficult for the residents to maneuver straight in. The dock that existed at his site when he moved in was illegal, as Well as the dock at the Saucier property, which is currently Owned by the Boedeckers. The variance application submitted in 1991 approved a blanket variance for both his site and the Sauciers site. · The dock installed in 2002 was the same length as his neighbors and was directed so that it came ~Lr~i-ght o u-t-2~i-.J:r-o-m-the-eXtended -side-site.Jin e._ A~adance_.application-was_submitted~byJul_y~ st_ after staff advised him to make the preper adjustments to comply With with the 199i Vadance Order or to submit the application. The only dock of the two parties that does not comply with the 1991 Vadance Order is the Boedeckers. He recommended that the Distdct forward the Boedeckers a letter similar to the one he received this last summer informing them that they need to comply with the variance order or to submit an application for variance. · He supported the proposal recommended by staff, although he pointed out that he was looking for permanent solution rather than a temporary solution. · He stated that he was willing to work with the Boedeckers on a possible compromise. He stated that he believed it would be appropriate for the Boedeckers to submit their own vadance application with required survey work. He stated that he agreed to do this in 1991 with the Sauciers out of the goodness of his heart. · He stated that he owned approximately 80' of lakeshore frontage and that he believed he should be able to locate the canopy as close as he Can to the adjusted side site line extension rather than in the middle of his site. He entertained comments or questions from the Board. Seuntjens aSked for clarification on what would be achieved with a three year temporary variance at the Boedecker site. ~ Nybeck stated that he proposed that because he believed the Board might want to have the Boedeckers submit an application for variance from Code in the near future. Foster stated that he would prefer to approve a permanent variance rather than a temporary variance for the Boedeckers. If the Board would like to set an expectation on alloWing the illegal Boedecker dock to continue for a set pedod of years, that could be documented in the FindingS of Fact and Order. Babcock stated that it might make sense to approve the side site line adjustments permanbntly and to approve the dock structure thatencroaChes in the side setback areas on a temporary basis. Because the facts have changed in the area since 1991, primarily the remoVal of the docks associated with c°Chrane's Boatyards, he concurred with staff that the dock installation at the Boedecker site would more appropriate five feet from their extended side site line. This is one reason he would support a temporary side setback varianCe for the current doCk structure The question he believed that needed to be resolved is whether to require Nagel to meet a 20' side setback for the proposed canopy. The Board further discussed the proposed vadance application. Some of the topics discussed included: · What the side setbacks fordock structure and canopy as proposed by Nagel. · How to deal with the placement of the Boedecker permanent dock that is not consistent with the 1991 Variance. -571 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page11 Possible ways to deal with the adjustment of the Nagel/Nagel extended side site line extension. What is a sufficient time period to expect the illegal Boedecker permanent doCk to come into compliance with Code. Foster stated that he believed the consensus of the Board was to: 1) leave the 23 degree adjustment of the Nagel/Boedecker extended side site line as detailed in the 1991 Variance Order, 2) to allow the applicant the flexibility of changing the common extended common side Site line extension between his two properties, 3) to require 10' side setbacks for the dock structure and 20' Side setbacks for the canopy from both extended side site lines of the abutting properties, and 4) the location of the Boedecker permanent dock should comply wit_~h.th_e_ _c?_n_d_.!t?_n s_~ _o~f. !b .e__! 97 I~V a_r_i_a _n .c_e_O_~d_.~[~ MOTION: Babcock moved, Knudsen seconded to: 1)rescind all Variances granted with the 12/4/91 Terry and Jill Nagel Variance Order,' and 2) to direct attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the proposed Nagel variance application maintaining, the 23 degree deflection of the Nagel/Boedecker extended side site line to the north;adjusting the Naget/Nagel extended side site line as determined at a later date, to' require all docking and watercraft storage to comply with Code requirements, and to approve a one-year Side setback temporary variance for the current dock on the north side of the Boedecker authorized dock use area until 12/31/03 because it does not comply with the five foot side setback required by Code. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Nelson left at 9:25 p.m. The meeting was'recessed at 9:25 p.m. and reconvened at 9:29 p.m. B. City of Excelsior, new multiple dock license and special density license applications for 116 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 3,120' of shoreline. Foster asked for background on this agenda item from staff. Nybeck made the following comments: · At the 12/18/02 Regular Board Meeting, a public hearing was conducted for new multiple dock license and special density license applications submitted by the City of Excelsior on ExCelSior Bay. The Board discussed and considered the proposed applications; however, the Board made no decision, The Board gave staff three directions for the next Regular BOard Meeting. First, LeFevere was directed to prepare,Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the Excelsior hew multiple dock license and special density license applications. A copy of the draft Findings were included in the packet. Second, staff was directed to further review the subjective criteda in review 0f these applications that states "Whether the proposed facility is compatible with the LMCD watercraft densitY classification criteria". A copy of the 1973 Boat Density Policy Statement for Lake Minnetonka was included in the packet. Third, staff was,directed to clarify how much shoreline each member city COuld potentially dedicate towards a multiple dock'license and special density license on Lake MinnetOnka: · The 1973,Boat Density Policy Statement has established an index to a~sist~in detemining whether to make a "Critical" designation for any area of Lake Minnetonka. Warning conditlons uSed as indices to determine this include: 1) storage of boats in excess of one boat per acre of water, 2) storage of boats in excess of 100 boats per mile, 3) official~"in-use" boat counts showing Lake usage id excess -572- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 · Page 12 of one boat per 20 acres of. water on three or more official count days in one season, 4) existence of multiple facilities (docks, moodng areas~, launching facilities, or dry land storage), and 5) areas with a CP (Crowing Potential) of 60 or less should be considered for designation as "Crowded" and 60 to 100 should be designated as "Potentially Crowded". If any one of these indices is met, the Executive Director should assign a "Potentially Crowded" designation and the Board notified. If any two of these indices are met, the area should be designated "Critical" and referred to the Board for remedial action. He reviewed these Board alternatives and provided an analysis of Excelsior and Carsons Bays, noting that both bays should be designated as "Critical" and the Board should take remedial action to address them. He questioned whether that was necessary at this time because the policy was nearly 30 Year_s old and the indi.ces should.be updated If the Board does not want to update the policy, consideration should be given to eliminating the subjective criteda from the Code in the review of new multiple dock license and special density license applications. Five of the 14 member cities on Lathe Minnetonka are approved for multiple dock licenses that consist of 782 Boat Storage Units (BSU'), These cities are Greenwood, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, and Tonka Bay. Three other member cities are approved for new multiple and special density licenses for an additional 418 SU s c t~es. These cities are Deephaven, Excelsior, and Wayzata, Shoreline dedicated for these eight member cities is approximately 51,395'. If these eight cities maximized their potential BSU's at a BSU density of 1:10', there is a' possibility of an additional 3,944 BSU's. This does not include potential shoreline for the remaining six member cities. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Burma stated that he believed the potential increase in BSU's with the member cities is skewed because Mound will not realistically increase their BSU's by approximately 2,500. Foster stated that he would like to discard the subjective criteria that refers to LMCD watercraft density classification criteria because he believed the policy was used in the 1970% to address ordinances pertaining to corrective measures to density, such as "Quiet Waters". Bays such as Excelsior Bay are harbor areas with higher densities and he believed that they are good for the lake, Babcock stated that he believed the 1973 policy was designed to protect the entire lake from achieving a very crowded density. It was also designed to protect certain areas of the lake that have a disproportionate lakeshore frontage to usable surface area. He questioned whether it had anything to do with the establishment of "Quiet Waters" or harbor areas; however, he supported these concepts in general. Some of the standards discussed in this policy, especially one boat for each acres of water, are nearly being met and he questioned whether the 1:50' General Rule and the 1:10' allowance for special density licenses are adequate and sustainable for the future. He believed that some aspects of the policy are very well written and he recommended updates and revisions to the policy to address harbor areas, such as Excelsior Bay. Seuntjens stated that he believed the 1973 policy was insightful and should updated modified as recommended by Babcock. LeFevere stated that he recalled the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka has defined actions for consideration by the Board when boat denSity reaches certain thresholds. He recommended that the Board should review this section of the Management Plan before deleting the LMCD watercraft subjective cdteria from the Code, MOTION: McMillan moved, Suer'th seconded to approve the City of ExCelsior new multiple dock license -573- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 J Page 13 application for the 2003 season and to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the City of Excelsior special density license as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Mr, Mytes McGrath, ExcelsiOr City Administrator, stated that boat density on Excelsior Bay was taken into consideration in the planning process of the changes proposed at the Excelsior Commons. Other plans have been considered by the City of Excelsior for a greater density than what was approved by the Board; however, they were not approved at the city level. The consensus Of the Board was that the 1973 BOat Density POlicy Statement would be discussed Under "New Business" later in the meeting. D. Additional Business. There was no additional business. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (12/16/02- 12/31/02) and (1/1/03- 1/15/03). Nybeck reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Foster moved, Babcock seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C, Additional Business. There was no additional business. LAKE USE & RECREATION B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE B, 12/13/02 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting Report. Suerth asked for an update on this meeting from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that there was discussion at this meeting on the 2002 EWM Harvesting Program Final Report, similar to what was recently reported to the Board. Additionally, there was an update on the 2003 zebra mussel pilot inspection program and the progress being made on fundraising by the LMA. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. -574- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page t4 6. ADMINISTRATION There was no discussion. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Nybeck stated that there were updated Code pages in the handout folders that had recently been prepared by LeFevere. He reported that this involved significant staff time for copying them and he questioned how many Board members have up to date Code books that they maintain. If the Board does not do this, he suggested that the Board inform him so that the office could fix the distribution list for circulation of updated Code pages in the future. The consensus of the Board was that the updated Code pages were on the District website and that staff does not need to forward updated copies of Code pages to the Board. Nybeck stated that he had recently met with the abutting neighbor on Maxwell Bay that was not included in a blanket variance that affect four of the abutting properties to his west. This resident for some years has shared a dock with his abutting neighbor to the west that was included in the variance order, Their shared dOokrin the past extends out beyond 100' from the 929.4' lake elevation and they collectively have stored more than four restricted at the shared dock, although each property on their own does not. This resident does not believe that this should trigger the need for a new multiple dock license, although I informed him that l believed it would. I informed him 1 would get clarification from the Board on this Code interpretation. The Board stated that this has been done at other sites around the lake. The consensus of the Board was that this resident and his neighbor would need to submit a new multiple dock license application if they COllectively store more than four restricted watercraft at the shared dock. 8. OLD BUSINESS McMillan stated that she would like to see the Board set a meeting this winter, possibly a scheduled Regular Board Meeting, to meet and discuss related topics with the commercial madna's on Lake Minnetonka. Possible topics to discuss included how they could assist in the District zebra mussel program and possibly public amenities. Foster stated that he would contact a representative from the commercial marinas to see if they are interested in such a meeting. He asked McMillan to e-mail her thoughts to him on possible discussion items at this meeting if it is scheduled. 8. NEW BUSINESS Boat Density Policy Discussion Babcock stated that there has been previous discussion on controlling boat density at the municipalities with the public amenities required for special density licenses. He questioned how effective this would be because he believed that most cities could come up with enough public amenity points that they are required to provide by Code. Shorewood Yacht Club Discussion -575- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting January 8, 2003 Page15 Babcock stated that he had recently reviewed the decision on White Bear Lake that could have some impact on the District. He informed the Board that he would like to be informed on the status of this case on the outcome of the Shorewood Yacht Club criminal prosecution with the City of Shorewood. Greenwood Board Representation Foster reported that the City of Greenwood has appointed Miles Canning to replace Sheldon Wed as their representative on the Board of Directors, 1973 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Policy Statement The consensus of the Board was to further discuss the 1973 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Policy Statement at the 1122/03 Regular Board Meeting. Staff was directed to include the boat density discussion from the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka. 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p,m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -576- The Gillespie Gazette VOL XI NO 2 lVebruavy- ~00~} PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE January 16, 2003 Dear Members and Friends, The New Year has come and gone, football games are almost over. After being relatively warm and dry, we have seen the cold come our way. We still have not seen much snow. I guess it may be like last year when we received most of our snow in March and April. Has anyone else missed the sound of snowmobiles? I am used to Seeing and hearing snowmobil'es on Lake Minnetonka. The~e is .little snow for snowmobilers to get to lakes, and even if they can get on lakes, the surface is icy and dangerous for snowmobiling. The highlight of the New Year for many of us was our Prime Rib Dinner on January 4~. This was truly a special event and an evening of enjoyment with family and friends. I hope that we can make this an annual get together. Many thanks go to those who made this possible. Thanks, Jerry and Diana Kohls, Jerry, Sandy and Ronnie Henke, Lezlie Anderson, Cathy Caho, Dana Byers, Rose Bruhn, Patty Turtle, Candace Wostrel, Molly Bailey, Nora and Dave Swanson, Bill Dynan, Kyle and Carla Bailey, Barb Calhoun, Margaret Thorne, Beanie and Deb Bailey and Leah Weycker. The job these people did preparing, cooking, serving and clearing was fantastic. Thanks also go to Kandis Hanson and the City of Mound, to the Mound Liquor Store, John Colotti, Julie Luedcke and Deb Grand, to Quality Wine and Spirits, Bob Johnson and Keven Rowan, to Jubilee Foods, Bob Boese and to Gregg Floor Covering. Thank you, all. A very special "thank you" goes to Cathy Bailey and Linda Dynan. They took the idea for this dinner, willed it to happen, recruited family and friends to help and worked countless hours in order to make this such a special event. Thanks to all our workers and to those who attended. This was something special for our Gillespie Center and for our community. Our thanks also go to our friends and neighbors, the VFW and Mound Auto Service, for allowing us to use their parking lots. A big "thank you" to our members, patrons and friends who have contributed to our annual request for help to f~nd our Center. We are an asset to our community and it takes people and f~nds to make our Center something we can all be proud of. Also, if you have not paid your dues for 2003, please pay them soon. Jack Weist Chairperson Gillespie Center Advisory Council -577- -578£ -579- -580- '. JUSTIN L. TEMPLIN HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION DIRECT (952) 746-2710 e-mail jtemplin~hbklaw.com January 15, 2003 Marc D. Simpson Leonard, Street and Deinard Suite 2300 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: John M. Anderson, et al v. City of Mound, et al Court File No: MC 02-011148 Our File No: 3200-150 Dear Mr. Simpson: Enclosed and served upon you by U.S. Mail please find Defendant City of Mound's Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiffs, Set One. Sincerely, ~pl/! '~ HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER, P.A. JLT:wmp Enclosure cc: Timothy J. Nolan, Esq. Kandis Hanson John Dean, Esq. 160 FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER 775 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 (952) 941-9220 FAX (952) 941-7968 1-800-989-9220 -582- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT John M, Anderson, Kelly M. Anderson Robert J. Beissel, Philip L. Bowman, Julie N. Bowman, Michael R. Gardner, Susan G. Gardner, Aaron S. Gross, Melissa S. Gross, Jeffrey J. Jesberg, Thomas R. Menken, Bonita J. Menken, Matthew J. Mizerny, John E. Mundt, Robert E. Riebe, Sharron L. Riebe, and Jason S. Sasanfar, Plaintiffs, City of Mound, a Minnesota m[tnicipal corporation; the unknown heirs of John D. Chipman, deceased and the unknown heirs of Jesse Chipman, deceased, Defendants. and Citizens for Commons Association, a Non-Profit Neighborhood Association, Applicant for Intervention. Case Type: Other Civil Court File No: MC 02-011148 Honorable Katherine L. Anderson Defendant City of Mound's Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiffs, Set One TO: PLAINTIFFS ABOVE NAMED AND THEIR ATTORNEY, MARC D. SIMPSON, LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD, SUITE 2300, 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Defendant City of Mound requests Answers to the following Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents in writing and under oath pursuant to the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure and that the Answers and Responses be served G:\WPDATAk3200-150\Pleadin g\INTs, RFPs.doc 1 -583- on Defendant City of Mound through counsel within 30 days after service of these Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. In answering the Interrogatories, furnish all information, however obtained, including hearsay which is available to you, and information known by or in possession of yourself, your agents and your attorneys, or appearing in your records. A question which seeks information contained in, or information about, or identification of any documents may be answered by providing a copy of such document for inspection and copying, or by furnishing a copy of such document. If you cannot answer the following Interrogatories in full after exercising due diligence to secure the full information to do so, so state and answer to the extent possible, specifying your inability to answer the remainder, stating whatever information or knowledge you have concerning the unanswered portion, and detailing what you did in attempting to secure the unknown information. If any information, whether or not written, is responsive to any of the following Interrogatories, and is withheld based on any claims of privilege, describe generally the substance or subject matter of the information, communication or document withheld, state the date of the communication or document, state the privilege being relied upon or claimed and the basis therefore, identify the persons involved, and identify all persons or entities who have had access tO such inforrnation, communication or document. These Interrogatories shall be deemed to be continuing until and during the course of trial. Information sought by these Interrogatories that you obtain after you serve your answers must be disclosed to the City by supplementary answers. G:\WPDATAL3200-150\Pleading\INTs, RFPs.doc 2 -584- The person or persons answering the following Interrogatories will each identify which answers have been provided and furnish his or her name, address and title. For purposes of these Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, the definitions set forth below are applicable: 1. "Identify," as it pertains to individuals, means to state the person's full name (including any "nickname" or alias by which the person was known during the transaction which is the subject of this lawsuit); address and phone numbers of home and business (both during the aforesaid transaction and at present, if different); his employment position (both during the aforesaid transaction and at present, if'different); and date of birth. 2. "Identify," as it pertains to documents, means to state the date, author or addressor, · type of document (e.g., letter, memorandum, estimate, etc.), all recipients of the document or copies of it, and its present location or custodian, or both. If such document was, but no longer is, in your possession or subject to your control, state what disposition was made of it. 3. "Describe," means to relate in as full and complete a manner as possible the substance of any agreement, conversation, writing, or other thing requested to be so identified. Such description shall include the date and place of any conversation, as well as the identities of all individuals present. When description of a document is requested, you shall specify the date, place, and circumstances of creation of the document and give a verbatim description (or as close thereto as possible) of the contents, as well as giving its present location and in whose possession the document is. In lieu thereof, a copy of the document may be supplied. 4. "Documents," means recordings of information of all kinds, whether written, typed, video- or audio-taped, stored electronically, or preserved in any way, shape or form. The term includes all versions, whether original or contemporaneously or subsequently made copy, regardless G:\WPDATA\3200-150XPleading\INTs, RFPs.doc 3 -585- of whether such copy is not identical by reason of any notatiOn made thereon, or otherwise. The term encompasses, but is not limited to, correspondence, memoranda, minutes, contracts, reports, studies, checks, statements, receipts, summaries, pamphlets, books, inter-office and intra-office communications, offers, notations of conversations, notations of telephone calls, e-mails, meetings, or other communications, bulletins, printed matter, computer printouts, teletypes, telefaxes, invoices, worksheets, and all drafts, alterations, modifications, changes, and amendments of any kind, and mechanical or electronic records, including but not limited to computer hard drives, servers, and any other data storage device, or other representations of any kind. 5. "You" or "your," means all Plaintiffs named herein and all other persons acting or purporting to act on any Plaintiff's behalf. Objection will be made at trial to the admission of in~brmation requested herein which is not provided. The Defendant, City of Mound, requests answers to the following: INTERROGATORIES 1. Identify each person providing information or assisting in answering these interrogatories. 2. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 2 that John M. Anderson and Kelly M. Anderson are owners in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 2 of your complaint. 3. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 3 that Robert J. Beissel is the owner in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 3 of your complaint. 4. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 4 that Philip L. Bowman and Julie N. Bowman are the owners in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 4 of your complaint. 5. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 5 that Michael R. Gardner and Susan G. Gardner are the owners in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 5 of your complaint. G:\WPDATAX.3200-150\Pleadin g\INTs, RFPs.doc 4 -586- 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 6 that Aaron S. Gross and Melissa S. Gross are the owners in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 6 of your complaint. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 7 that Jeffrey J. Jesberg is the owner in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 7 of your complaint. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 8 that Thomas R. Menken and Bonita J. Menken are the owners in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 8 of your complaint. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 9 that Matthew J. Mizerny is the owner in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 9 of your complaint. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 10 that John E. Mundt is the owner in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 10 of your complaint. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 11 that Robert E. Riebe and Sharron L. Riebe are the owners in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 11 of your complaint. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 12 that Jason S. Sasanfar is the owner in fee simple of the land described in Paragraph 12 of your complaint. Describe the basis for your allegations in Paragraphs 18 and 19 that Wiota Common was a street or an avenue at the time of the plat dedication. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 20 that Wiota Common was dedicated as a private street easement. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 29 that Wiota Common and Wawonaissa Common are similar as to the facts surrounding public dedication. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 30 related to what Mr. and Mrs. Chipman and/or the subsequent fee owners of Wiota Common intended regarding Wiota Common. Describe the basis for your allegations in Paragraphs 31 and 32 that there has been no act of dedication and no act of acceptance of any dedication of the Wiota Common. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 33 that the initial and subsequent deeds for the lots adjoining Wiota Common also conveyed fee simple ownership of the adjoining segments of Wiota Common. G:\WPDATAk3200-150h°leadi n g\lNTs, RFPs.doc 5 -587- 19. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 34, that Plaintiffs obtained fee simple ownership of the adjoining segments of Wiota Common through adverse possession. 20. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 36 that Plaintiffs are fee owners of land lying between their lots and Lake Minnetonka and provide documentation that supports your allegation that riparian rights to Lake Minnetonka have attached to Plaintiffs' lots. 21. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 37 that Plaintiffs are in actual possession of the premises described in your complaint. 22. Describe the basis for your allegation in Paragraph 40 that the City of Mound has only limited prescriptive easements rights to the land described in Paragraphs 2-12 of your complaint. 23. Describe the irreparable damage that will allegedly be suffered by the Plaintiffs if the City continues to license docks and regulate activities in connection with Wiota Common as alleged in Paragraph 43 of your complaint. 24. Describe the basis for your statement on page 6 of your Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Intervene that "inland owners may or may not have certain private property rights in Wiota Common by virtue of owning land in Dreamwood; but those rights are different from the rights of the public .... " 25. Identify all exhibits you intend to offer at trial. 26. Pursuant to Rule 26.02(d)(1)(A), identify all persons whom you expect to call at the hearing on this matter as an expert witness, state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a description of the grounds for each opinion. 27. Identify all fact witnesses you expect to call at trial and their anticipated testimony. 28. State the substance of any admissions you claim have been made by an adverse party in this litigation and, for each admission thus claimed, state by whom, to whom, when and where each admission was made and identify each and every person that witnessed each such claimed admission. REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Provide clear, complete, and legible copies of all documents supporting or otherwise referenced in your answers to Interrogatories served herewith. 2. Provide clear, complete, and legible copies of all Plaintiffs' tax statements since 1987. G :\WPDATA',3200 - 150\Pleadi ng\INTs, RFPs.doc 6 -588- o o Provide clear, complete, and legible copies of all Plaintiffs' deeds or other evidence of ownership of the properties described in your complaint. Provide clear, complete and legible copies of all statements made by any person that are related to the subject matter of this lawsuit. Provide clear, complete, and legible copies of all documents not provided pursuant to a previous Request herein that are related to the subject matter of this lawsuit. For any document that is responsive to any Request herein that you claim is subject to attorney-client privilege or is otherwise protected from fair discovery, provide a description of the document including its date of origin, its maker and all recipients, and a general description of its subject matter and contents. Dated: ~ ~x~ ~ '~ ,2003 x.C.~orge C. Hoff (#45546) Justin L. Templin (#807305) HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER, P.A. 160 Flagship Corporate Center 775 Prairie Center Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (952) 941-9220 Attorneys for Defendant City of Mound G:\WPDATA\3200-150\Pleading\lNTs, RFPs.doc 7 -589- JAN.23'2003 17:00 952 941 GBORGE C, HOPP 7968 HOFF BARRY KUDERER HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION #3534 P.001/00$ DIRECT (95g) 746-2706 e-mat1 ghoff~ hb~aw.com January 23, 2003 VIA FACSIMILE ONLY: (952)472-0620 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1627 Re: J__o~hAM._And_erspa[eta! y:City of Mound Our File No, 3200-150. BRAC #11037340 Dear Ms. Hanson: Please find enclosed with this a copy of the Order in the above-captioned matter, which grants the intervention right of the Citizens fo~ Commons Association, As you know, pursuant to Council direction, we supported their application for intervention. You should note, however, i that the intervention is only for the limited purpose of arguing that indispensable parties are lacking. That means that the neighbors will only be able to argue that the case should be dismissed because the Plaintiffs did not name all of the property owners individually who may. be impacted by this case, I have had the opportunity to discuss the matter with John Dean. He and I agree that the next ! appropriate step would be to contact the neighbors' attorney, Tim Nolan, and discuss with him the appropriate manner in which to bring the motion with respect to failure to name indispensable parties. As you may recall, we raised that as an affirmative defense in our Answer, If you feel there is some need to meet with the City Council to discuss t.his matter, please advise me and I will be more than happy to attend a Council Meeting. HOFF, BARRY & KUD~ERER' P.A. OCH:baj cc: John Dean, Esq. - via fax = (612) 337-9310. Mark Rossow - (651) 251-1297 160 FLAGSHIP CORPORATE CENTER 775 PRAIRIE CENTER DRIVE, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA $2344 (952) 941-9220 FAX (952) 941-7968 1-I~00.989.9220 -590- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT John M. Anderson, et al., City of Mound, et al., and Plaintiffs, Defendants, Citzens for Commons Association, a non-profit neighborhood association, Applicant for Intervention. File No. MC 02-11148 ORDER The above-entitled matter came before the Honorable Catherine L. Anderson, Judge of District Court, on October 21, 2003, upon Applicant for Intervention's Motion to Intervene. Marc D. Simpson, Esq., appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs;, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant; Justin L. Templin, Esq., appeared on behalf ot~Defendant City of Mound; and Timothy J. Nolan, Esq.., appeared on behalf of A.pplicant for Intervention. · - Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, and being fully advised in the premises, the Court now makes the following: ORDER 1. Applicant for Interveniion's Motion to Intervene is granted. Accordingly, Citizens for Common Association may intervene as a matter of right but only for the limited purpose of arguing that indispensable parties are lacking. -591 - The attached Memorandum is made a part hereof. Dated: January 16, 2003 BY THE COURT:. Catherine L. Anderson Judge of District Court -592- MEMORANDUM This matter is before the court on a motion to intervene. For the reasons set forth b¢low, the motion to intervene is granted. I. BACKGROUND In 1907, John and Jesse Chipman, fee owners of property fronting Lake Minnetonka, dedicated some of the property into a plat called the Dreamwood development. The Dreamwood plat contained lakefront property called the Wiota Common, which was dedicated to all Dreamwood property owners, including both owners of lakefront property and owners of inland property. Ever since, the owners of inland property in Dreamwood have enjoyed access to the Wiota Common, and most recently, they have docked and accessed boats using Wiota Common. The Plaintiffs in this case own lakefront property adjoining Wiota Common, which is located in the City of Mound (the City). The City has charged dock liter/sing fees to Plaintiffs and has also licensed docks on Wiota Common to persons other than Plaintiff,'including some of Dreamw6od's inland property owners. Plaintiffs commenced this action against the City seeking a determination that the City has no interest in Wiota Common. Plaintiffs also seek injunctive relief enjoining the City from "[1]icensing docks along the lakeshore strips to anyone, except to plaintiffs pursuant to such future ordinances as may be duly enacted by the City Council for all docks along all privately owned lakeshore in the City of Mound." Citizens for Commons AsSociation (Citizens for Commons), a non-profit neighborhood association composed of Dreamwood's inland property owners, now moves the Court pursuant to Rule 24.01 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for an 1 -593- Order allowing it to intervene as a matter of right. the City supports it. II. Plaintiffs oppose intervention, while ANALYSIS Rule 24.01 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure provides: Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted t° intervene in an action when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and the applicant is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the applicant's ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's interest is adequately represented by existing parties. Under the rule, a non-party is entitled to intervene if the non-party makes a four-part showing: (1) a timely application for intervention; (2) an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action; (3) circumstances demonstrating that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the party's ability to protect that interest; and (4) a showing that the party is not adequately represented by the existing parties. See Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Schumacher, 392 N.W.2d 197, 207 (Minn. 1986). Rule 24.01 should be applied liberally and in favor of intervention. See Engelrup v. Potter~,.224 N.W.2d 484, 489 (Minn. 1974). A. Has Citizens for Commons Made a Timely ~pplication for . ~[ntervention? To intervene as a matter of right, the non-party must make a timely application for intervention. Minn. R. Civ. P. 24.01. Less than a month after Plaintiffs commenced this action, Citizens for Commons served their Notice of Intervention and Intervenor's Answer. Accordingly, Citizens f~r Commons has made at timely application for intervention. 2 -594- B. Does Citizens for Commons Have an Interest Relating to Wiota Commons? To intervene as a matter of right, the non-party must have an interest relating to the property which is the subject of thc action. Minn. R. Civ. P. 24.01. Here, Wiota Common is the property which is the subject of the action, and according to the Complaint, the City has "licensed docks on Wiota Common to owners of inland lots in Dreamwood." (Compl. ~ 42.) Those inland property owners comprise Citizens for ,Commons. Since its members have docks on Wiota Common, Citizens for Commons has an interest relating to the property which is the subject of the action. C. Are There Circumstances Demonstrating That Disposition of This Action May as a Practical Matter Impair or Impede Citizens for Commons' Abili ,ty to Protect Its Members' Interest in Licensing. Docks on Wiota COmmon from the Ci~,? To intervene as a matter of right, a party must show circumstances demonstrating that disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the party'~ ability to protect that interest. Minn. R. Civ. P. 24.01. In their Complaint, Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief enjoining the City from "[1licensing docks along the plaintiffs' respective lakeshore strips to anyone, except to plaintiffs pursuant to such future ordinances as may be duly enacted by the City Council for all docks along all privately owned lakeshore in the City of Mound.''~ (Compl. at 11.) By its terms, such relief would permanently preclude the City from licensing docks to the members of Citizens for ~ Plaintiffs' requested relief differs from that requested in Flack, et al. v. City of Mound, et al:,' Hennepin County Court File No. 93-15728, because there, plaintiffs sought tO enjoin the city from "[1]icensing docks along the plaintiff' s respective l akeshore to anyone, except pursuant to such future ordinances as may be duly enacted by the City Council for all docks along all privately owned lakeshore in the City of Mound." (Pls.' Ex. D. at 10-11.) Thus, in Flack, the injunctive relief sought by plaintiffs would not preclude the city from licensing docks to inland property owners pursuant to future ordinances. Conversely, in this case, since Plaintiffs seek to 3 -595- Commons. Accordingly, disposition of this case may as a practical matter impair or impede Citizens for Commons' ability to protect its members' interest in licensing docks on Wiota Common from the City. _. D. Is Citizens for Commons Adequately Represented by Exi~tin? Parties? To intervene as a matter of right, a non-party must show that it is not adequately represented by existing parties. Minn. R. Civ. P. 24.01. The City has raised the lack of ,indispensable parties as an affim~ative defense. However, if Citizens for Commons does not intervene, the City and Plaintiffs could settle the case by an agreement detrimental to interesTM of Dreamwood's inland property owners. Accordingly, Citizens for Commons is not adequately represented by existing parties. E. Does Citizens for Commons Have Representative Standing? Plaintiffs argue that Citizens for Commons does not have representative standing because the relief requested requires the participation of its individual members. _See Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc., 373 N.W.2d784, 790 (Minn. App. 1985) (noting the requirement). Parti.cipation of the individual members would be necessary to a binding determination of their interests in Wiota Common. ~owever, participation of the. individual members is not necessary to defend against Plaintiffs' action on the ground that indispensable parties - namely, Dreamwood's inland property owners - are lacking. For that reason, Citizens for Commons' fight to intervene is limited strictly to raising the defense that indispensable parties are lacking. enjoin the City from licensing docks to anyone "except plaintiffs", the injunctive relief sought would preclude the city from licensing docks to inland property owners. 4 -596- III. CONCLUSION Having made the requisite showing under Rule 24.01, Citizens for Commons may intervene as a matter of right. However, since its individual members are not participating, Citizens for Commons may intervene only for the purpose of raising and presenting the defense that indispensable parties are lacking. 5 -597- Date: Time: Call T~ Organiz~ff~n: McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Telephone Conversation Report Client: Project: ~~._~ ~.~~-~ Project No.: ~ ' File: Title: Telephone: ~'~-/ ~ Z - ~'o"'~"~ Discussion: Page 1 of 3 JodiRahn~cit~ofmound.com From: To: Sent: Attach: ~ubjoet~ "Kandis Hanson" <KandisHanson@cityofmound.com> "Jodi Rahn" <JodiRahn@cityofmound.com> Friday, January 17, 2003 4:30 PM header, htm Fw: DCAC - Minuteg, January 16, 2003 (Very rough draft Please print these and put in my box. Thanks! Kandis .... Original Message ..... From: Denice Widmer To: Kandis M Hanson Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:28 PM Subject: DCAC - Minutes, January 16, 2003 (Very rough draft) MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION January 16, 2003 Present: Commissioners Mark Goldberg, Jim Funk, Greg Eurich, Gerald Jones, Council Representative Mark Hanus Also Present: Parks Director Jim Fackler, Docks Administrator Katie Hoff, Secretary Denice Widmer Absent and Excused: Frank Ahrens Meeting called to order at 7:30 by Chair, Jim Funk. 1. Approval of November 21, 2002 DCAC Minutes MOTION by Jones to approve the minutes. SECONDED by Funk. Motion carried. 2. Agenda Changes Item # 5 moved to February 20, 2003 Agenda per applicant request. MOTION by Funk to approve agenda with changes noted. SECOND by Goldberg. Motion carried. 3. Comments and Suggestions from citizens present. None present. 4. Discuss: Election of Officers MOTION by Goldberg that Jim Funk remain as Chair and Greg Eurich remain as Vice Chair. SECOND by Jones. Motion carried. 5. Discuss: Request for dock at 5446 Bartlett Blvd - 599- 01/22/2003 Page 2 of 3 e ge Moved to February 20, 2003 Agenda per request from applicant. Discuss: Centerview Access Fackler gave overview of his discussion with the LMCD and staff recommendations. (Memos were included in packet.) Discussion followed regarding possibility bf adding more than 17 slips to the multiple dock and what the ramifications would be from current dock holders, neighbors, LMCD, etc. There was discussion on inviting area residents to a public hearing on this issue. It was decided to get the costs together and invite the residents at a later date. During this discussion, Hanus was asked if the Council had set up a meeting with the DCAC yet. He stated it is tentatively slated for February, and encouraged all the commissioners to attend. Fackler was asked to research the cost of the multiple slip dock and the in and out fees for the February 20, 2003 meeting. Goldberg also requested a spreadsheet which included rip-rap figures. Discuss: 2003 Dock Location Map Changes Fackler stated that he met with John Cameron recently and the new maps should be completed soon, and he will hopefully bring them with to the February meeting. Goldberg asked him what the advantage to these maps will be. Fackler stated they will show setbacks, shoreline, etc, will be an invaluable resource for the LMCD and the public. ., MOTION by Funk to forward the 2003 Dock Location Map Changgs to the Council with changes 1 through 4 approved and change #5 postponed until next mgeting. Second by Goldberg. Motion carried. Review: 2002 Season Final Report The two lakeshore property owners who also had commons docks are no longer part of the docks program. There was some discussion on the ensuring that the renter, not the property owner, be the one applying for the program. Katie stated she felt this issue will be cleared up through, not only the changes made on the new application forms, but also by en~uring that the boat registrations are in the renter's name, as a resident of Mound. There Was also discussion on people who pay for a dock but don't have a boat and don't put a dock in. A discussion followed on shares and whether or not they could end up taking up all the available sites. Katie stated that the share issue had been addressed on the new application forms, an~]' also by the fact that shares have to be participate in the program for two full seasons before theg are eligible. Hanus suggested that the commission needed to keep a close eye on this isSUe and look at changing the ordinance somewhere in the future. Katie was asked to bring this issue back again, with the addition of p~rsonal watercraft information, and the number of docks with 1 boat, 2 boats, 3 boats, etc. It was decided to bring this issue back after the season is over in September or October. ~ Discuss: 2003 Budget Sheet/Expenditures/Income FYI only. - 600- 01/22/2003 Page 3 of 3 10. Review: FYI only. 11. Review: Work Rules Agenda Calendar *Added to February: Bartlett Dock, Centerview Dock Costs, Spreadsheet, Joint Council meeting (penciled in) *Added to September: 2003 Share Count Review, 2003 Boat Count, 2003 Share Activity *Added to October: 2003 Season Final Report *Added to November: Review 2004 Approved Budget *December calendar cleared MOTION by Funk to approve the agenda calendar with changes. SECOND. by Jones. Motion carried. 12. Reports: City Council Representative: Hanus just had a reminder about the Volunteer Recognition Dinner. Hanus also informed the DCAC that the park at Metro Plains had been named for Frank Weiland in honor of his dedicated service on the Planning Commission and the Fire Department. Urged all to attend the dinner to honor Frank. Parks Director: No comments MOTION by Funk to adjourn meeting. SECOND by Goldberg. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:45pm. - 001 - 01/22/2003 Jan 17 2003 15:22:85 ~i~ ~x -) 9524728628 fld~inistw~ov Pa~e 881 Of 881 -FridayFax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Week Two: Pace Quickens and the Plot Thickens The second week of the 2003 legislative session will end today with the Senate completing theh' work on their alternative response to Governor Pawlenty's emergency supplemental budget. Only 17'weeks to go-- before the end of the regular session and what many believe rnight be a special legislative session to finish the legislature's budget balancing work. Pawlenty's proposal, released on Tuesday, shaved $468 million in state spending--enough to cover the estimated short-term $356 million deficit and set aside $112 million in case the state's revenues falter even more before the end of the current fiscal year on June 30, 2003. Fiscal staff show that $24 million is the current budget reserve. Relative to the governor's proposal, the Senate plan restores funding for several programs including CrimNet local planning, the 21st century minerals fund, the ethanol production subsidy, Clean Water Partnership grants, and several other grant programs. Most of the Senate's cuts take place in the areas of Health, Human Services and Corrections departments. In regards to a reserve, the Senate's plan would add $28 million to a current $24 rnillion. The House plan will be unveiled next week and will receive almost irnmediate committee action. Committee chairs pledged to take up their proposal and vote it out of committees on Tuesday. The Senate's budget balancing proposal passed out of Senate Finance committee today, and is likely to be taken up at their flOOr session, which is scheduled for next Thursday. January 17, 2003 Its clear from observing caucus's activity in both bodies there is definite rnornentul~ to get the short-term budget deficit taken care of so time and attention can be focused on the largel' '04-05 problem of $4.2 billion. Once the House and Senate pass their respective bills this coming week, there will be a conference committee to harnmer out a negotiation. The media has reported that the Governor will give the legislature until early February before he uses his authority to unallot. Other Legislative News Former Sen. Gene Merriam was named Department of Natural Resources Commissioner today with current Rep. Mark Holsten (R-Stillwater) being named deputy DNR Commissioner. With Holsten's resignation will come a special election for 52B. Commissioner-designate Sheryl Corrigan will name a new Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Deputy Commissioner next week. Committee hearings next week will concentrate on departmental overviews and tours of agencies and programs. For a full schedule go to the legislative website at www. leg.state, mn. us. Legislative Conference draws more than 250 city officials On Wednesday, attendees of the League's legislative conference heard from key legislative leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Hottinger and House Ways and Means Chair Jim Knoblach. In addition, Finance Commissioner, Dan McElroy briefed cities on Governor Pawlenty's emergency budget and priorities for the administration. For more infmmalion on oily legislative issues, conlact any membe~ of lhe League of Minnesota C/lies Intergovernmental Relalions learn. 651,281,1200 or 800.925.1122 -602- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum From: Date: Re: Mark Hanus Sarah Noerenberg Smith, Community Development Director 1/10/2003 2002 Planning Cases - status As per your request, a copy of the 2002 PC Cases is attached. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards. -603- Case # Page 1of 3 (Revised 01/10/03) DATE TYPE OF CASE APPLICANT SUBMITTED STATU-~ 02-01 02-02 02-03 02-04 02-05 02-06 02-07 02-08 02-09 02-10 02-11 02-12 02-13 02-14 02-15 02-16 Minor Subdivision Waiver of Platting Variance Preliminary Plat Minor Subdivision Paul Berquist/David Logelin 4778-90 Northern Rd Variance Gary Jordan 1/08/02 No Action 6635 Bartlett Blvd Walter Peterson 5243-87 Eden Rd Variance Rodrigo & Virginia Plaza 1/22/02 No Action 4539 Island View Dr Paul Berquist/David Logelin 4778-90 Northern Rd Henry/Gina Lazniarz 3/1/02 4531 Manchester Rd Variance KeithNictoria Jenniges 3/4/02 Withdrawn 6122 Ridgewood Rd Variance James Roberge CC Approved 1680 Bluebird Ln Not filed James Roberge 1680 Bluebird Ln Variance Brett Anderson 3/28/02 CC Approved 2136 Belmont Lane John & Kathy Aquilina 4/2/02 3030 Island View Drive John Pastuck 4/3/02 Bartlett Blvd Bill Baker 4948 Wilshire Blvd John/Michelle Olson 5060 Waterside Ln Matt La Joy 4831 Shoreline Dr KellyNeronica Johnson 5/1/02 2331 Driftwood Ln 1/11/02 CC Approved Denied by LMCD 1/15/02 Filed CC Approved Denied by LMCD CC Approved CC Approved Not filed Variance PC Denied CC Denied Minor Subdivision CC Approved Variance 4/8/02 PC Denied See 02-21 Withdrawn Variance 4/30/02 Filed CUP Amendment 4/30/02 Filed Minor Subdivision CC Approved -604- Case # CASES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION FOR 2002 Page 2of 3 (Revised 01/10/03) DATE TYPE OF CASE APPLICANT SUBMITTED STATUS 02-17 02-18 02-19 02-20 02-21 02-22 02-23 02-24 02-25 02-26 02-27 02-28 02-29 02-30 02-31 02-32 Variance PDNCUP Amendment Joan Schluttner 2600 Westedge Blvd Rottlund Company Langdon Bay Variance Mike Gardner 5/7/02 CC Approved 1599 Bluebird Ln Rezoning Various Comp Plan Amendments Variance Bill Baker 4948 Wilshire BIvd Waiver of Platting 4/29/02 Withdrawn Constructed conforming 5~6~02 CC Approved PC 7/15/02 Approved with modifications 6/18~02 7/15~02 PC Withdrawn/Revised #02-23 Mark Stein 7/1/02 5765 Sunset Rd Variance Bill Baker 7/1/02 Filed 4948 Wilshire BIvd Variance CUP Rezoning Waiver of Platting Waiver of Platting Public Safety Building Public Safety Building Tim Becker Three Points Blvd Steve Coddon Tonkawood/Spruce Mittlestaedt 1625 Eagle Ln Henry/Gina Lazniarz 4531 Manchester Rd Steven Bedell 5925 Ridgewood Rd Steffan Madsen 2586 Avon Dr Mark Reckinger 4841 Island View Dr Final Plat Waiver of Platting Variance Variance 8/5/O2 CC Approved CC Approved CC Denied 7/17/02 Withdrawn 7/23/02 Filed 7/25/02 Filed 8/1/02 CC Approved 8/1/02 Filed 8/19/02 Filed -605- Case # CASES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION FOR 2002 Page 3of 3 (Revised 01/10/03) DATE TYPE OF CASE APPLICANT SUBMITTED STATUR 02-33 02-34 02-35 02-36 02-37 Variance Steven Bedell 9/3/02 5925 Ridgewood Rd CUP Amendment Waiver of Platting Mahogany Bay 2642 Commerce Blvd City of Mound (Land behind Balboa) CC Approved 9/10/02 CC Approved 9/16/02 CC Approved Variance KellyNeronica Johnson 5/1/02 2331 Driftwood Ln Variance Stacie Mittelstaedt 10/1/02 Fil 1625 CC Approved 02-39 02-40 02-41 Variance Martin 10/1/02 1631 Dove Lane Withdrawn 10/7/02 Variance Pamela Weatherhead/ 10/15/02 Filed Danny Hilll 4640 Island View Drive Variance Mound Market Place LLC 11-26-02 PC 1/6/03 Lawrence W. Olson Metro Plains -606- Voting Requirements for Council Actions By Susan Naughton city council can generally take action by simple majority vote. However, sometimes statutes or charter provisions require certain council actions to be approved by a unanimous vote or by an extraordinary majority vote, such as a four-fifths or two-thirds vote. Keeping track of the number of votes required for various actions can be confusing. This article highlights some of the statutes that require something more than a simple majority vote to approve certain types of council action. It is important to review the specific wording of the relevant statute when determining how many votes are required. For example, assume a statute requires a council to approve an action by a "four-fifths vote of all its members." This means the action will only be effective if four-fifths of the total num- bet of members of the council are present and vote to approve the action. In con- trast, assume the statute simply requires the council to approve the action by a "four-fifths vote." This means the action will be effective if at least a quorum of the council is present and four-fifths of the quormn vote to approve it. Zoning ordinances. Adoption or amendment of zoning ordinances gen- erally requires a simple majority vote of all members of the council. However, adoption or amendment of any portion of a zoning ordinance changing all or part of a zoning district from residential to commercial or industrial requires a two-thirds vote [Minn. Stat. ~ 462.357, subd. 2(b)]. Comprehensive plans. A compre- hensive plan can only be adopted or amended by resolution approved by a two-thirds vote (Minn. Stat. ~ 462.355, sub& 3). Abolishing a planning agency. A planning commission or planning department can only be abolished by a two-thirds vote (Minn. Stat. ~ 462.354, subd. 1). Capital improvements and acquisition or disposal of real property. If a city has a comprehensive plan, the planning agency must review any proposed capital improvement or acquisition or disposal of real property by the city. However, the council can dispense with this review, by resolution approved by a two-thirds vote, if it finds that the proposed action has no relationship to the comprehensive plan (Minn. Stat. ~ 462.356, sub& 2). Official interest in contracts. A councilmember generally may not have a financial interest in a city contract. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. These exceptions can only be approved by a unanimous vote (Minn. Stat. ~ 471.88, subd. 1). Local improvements. It takes a four-fifths vote to adopt a resolution approving an improvement project that will be financed with special assessments, unless the owners of at least 35 percent of the property to be assessed have petitioned for it (Minn. Stat. ~ 429.031, subd. 1). It takes a four-fifths vote to adopt a resolution approving any park improvement that will be financed with special assessments regardless of whether there has been a petition (Minn. Stat. ~ 429.031, subd. 2). Charter amendments. A proposed charter anaendment generally must first be submitted to the charter commission. However, in a city with a population under 10,000, the council can, by ordi- nance passed by a four-fifths vote, put proposed amendments directly to the voters (Minn. Stat. ~ 410.12, subd. 6). Under certain circumstances, the council can amend the charter by ordinance passed by a unanimous vote (Minn. Stat. ~ 410.12, sbu& 7). Summary publication of ordinances. Instead of publishing the entire text of an ordinance, statutory cities may publish a surmaqary under certain circum- stances. It takes a four-fifths vote to approve summary publication (Minn. Stat. ~ 412.191, sub& 4). Park ~oard. It takes a unanimous vote to adopt an ordinance abolishing a statutory park board. It takes a two- thirds vote to change its size (Minn. Stat. ~ 412.501). Street vacation. It takes a four-fifths vote to approve a resolution vacating a street or alley, unless there has been a petition from a majority of the abutting landowners (Minn. Stat. [ 412.851). Street reconstruction. Under certain circumstances, a city can sell bonds for street reconstruction without holding an election. It takes a unanimous vote to approve this type of bond sale (Minn. Stat. 5 475.58, subd. 3b). Accepting gifts. A city may accept a gift by resolution approved by a two- thirds vote (Minn. Stat. [ 465.03). Storm-sewer improvement tax district. It takes a two-thirds vote to adopt an ordinance establishing a storm-sewer improvement tax district (Minn. Stat. ~ 444.17). Budget modification. After the budget resolution has been adopted, it takes a four-fifths vote to adopt a resolution reducing the sums appropriated for any purpose or authorizing the transfer of sums from unencumbered balances of appropriations in the budget resolution to other purposes (Minn. Stat. ~ 412. 731). Abolition of police civil service com- mission. It takes a unanimous vote to abolish a police civil service commission (Minn. Stat. ~ 419.16). ~- Susan Naughton is research attorney with the League of Minnesota Cities. Phone: (651) 281- I232. E-maih snaughto~ tmnc. org. NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2002 MINNESOTA CITIES -607- ~1/14/2003 09:30 9524718937 LORDFL£TCH P~GE 01 Mr. Alan Bell President Lord Flemhers 3746 Sunset Drive Spr/ng Park, Minnesota 55413 January ! 3, 2003 Mayor Rockvam, I wantext m take the time to write to you and make you aware of the professional and helpful manner in which the Mound Fire Department conducted themselves. They went beyond the call of duty. We had a sprinkler water main break in the attic on Sunday, January 12, 2003. They were dispatched, as thai type of situation sends out an alarm They Showed up and dug right in helping us to move furniture out of the way, helping to squeoqee the waxer from the floor and checking on the electrical wiring.. We appreciate all of their help and want'to commend them on their performance, A3~ W. ~ell President 3746 Sunset Drive · RO. Box 44(; · 8pripg Park, MN 55584-0446 · Telephone: 952 471-8515 · Facsimile: 952 471-893T -608- LEN HARRELL Chief of Police TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MOUND POLICE 5341 MayWood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-O621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 Kandis Hanson Acting Chief John McKinley Monthly Report for December, 2002 STATISTICS The police department responded to 652 call~ for service during the month of Decemb&. There were 19 Part I o~enSes ~reported. There was 1 Criminal Sexual Conduct, 4 burglaries, 12 larcenies and 2 vehicle thefts reported. There were 61-PartlI'~ fThose offenses include 3 child abuse/neglect, 2 criminal damage to property, 8 narcotics, 12 liquor law violations, 9 DUI, 16 (6'~ assaults), and 11 other offenses. The juvenile citations. Parking ~iat~S ~oUnted for ~:~addifi6~ 44 tiekets. Warnings were issued to 86~i~duat~ for a Variety~of vi61ati0fiSi: There 39 adUl~ ~d: iT.jUvenile§ arres~:for misdemeanors. There were There assisted Mound and requested -609- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - December, 2002 II. INVESTIGATIONS Investigations were conducted on 3 burglaries, 1 child protection, 2 motor vehicle theft and 1 fleeing an officer in a stolen motor vehicle cases. Other cases investigated included thefts, forgery, assaults, narcotics and stalking. Formal complaints were issued for Felony 5th degree possession of controlled substance, Driving After Cancelation, Felony Receiving Stolen Property, Gross Misdemeanor False Information to a Police Officer, No Proof of Insurance, Violation of Instruction Permit, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia, Disorderly Conduct, Gross Misdemeanor 3rd Degree DUI, Gross Misdemeanor 2nd Degree DUI, Gross Misdemeanor Test Refusal, Issuance of Worthless Checks, Domestic Assault and Misdemeanor 4th Degree DUI. III. PERSONNEL/STAFFING Officers used approximately 32.5 hours of overtime during the month of December. Officers used 46 hours of comp-time, 101.5 hours of sick time, and 160 hours of vacation. Officers earned 70 hours of comp time. Holidays taken accounted for 350 hours of time off. Officers earned 143 hours of double time pay working during the holiday seasor~ Zach Petz continues his field mining by working with both Officers Beck and Burke. Reports from the training officers state that Petz is catching on to our system and is progressing as expected. The entire department attended defensive tactics training in December. Two officers attended Emergency Medical Technician re-certification during the month. This time of the year is normally a slow time for training. V. COMMUNITY'SERVICE OFFICER Mike continues to do an excellent job as our Community Service Officer. We are very pleased with his commitment to the job and to the City of Mound. -610- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - December, 2002 VI. RESERVES The reserves donated over 236.75 hours to the community in December. The unit's strength had continued to grow. We now have ten active reserves who contribute on a regular basis. -611- -612- 0000000 O00 0000000 0000000 000 000000 000 000000 ooooooo 0000000 0 O0 O0 ~0000 000 O0 O00 O0 00~ ~ O00 ~ ~ o 0 m -613- 000000 0000000000 0000 O00 O00 Z~-O 0 Z ~eO ITl oO8~ ooo~ oooo~ -614- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT DECEMBER 2002 O~'~SES CLEARED EXCEPT- CLEARED BY ARRESTED REPORTED UNFOUNDED C~ ARREST ADULT ~ Homicide Criminal Sexual Conduct Robbery Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Vehicle Theft Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 I i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 19 4 0 0 0 0 Child Abuse/Neglect Forgery/NSF Checks Criminal Damage to Property Weapons Narcotic Laws Liquor Laws DWI Simple Assault Domestic Assault Domestic (No Assault) Harassment Juvenile Status Offenses Public Peace Trespassing All Other Offenses 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 6 2 12 0 0 12 12 7 9 0 0 9 9 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 6 0 0 5 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 4 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 2 TOTAL 61 0 0 47 39 17 PART II & PART IV Property Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Medicals Animal Complaints Mutual Aid Other General Investigations 7 1 0 44 35 13 433 533 HCCP Inspections 3 36 TOTAL 652 47 39 17 -615- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT DECEMBER 2002 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY Hazardous Citations Non-Hazardous Citations Hazardous Warnings Non-Hazardous Warnings Verbal Warnings Parking Citations DWI Over .10 Property Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Adult Felony Arrests Adult Misdemeanor Arrests Juvenile Felony Arrests Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests Part I Offenses Part II Offenses Medicals Animal Complaints Ordinance Violations Other Public Contacts THIS YEAR TO LAST YF~ MDNTH DATE TO DATE 59 673 639 21 361 474 18 54 152 33 256 461 115 938 901 44 245 605 9 63 60 8 50 57 7 118 114 1 33 20 0 0 0 0 33 31 44 327 357 1 11 25 17 122 175 19 288 426 61 668 807 44 324 350 35 412 615 36 368 441 433 5,110 6,593 TOTAL Assists Follow-Ups HCCP Mutual Aid Given Mutal Aid Requested 1,005 10,454 13,303 63 475 521 15 181 622 3 30 38 13 161 158 17 75 60 -616- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT DECEMBER 2002 CITATION~ DWI More Than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired or No Plates Stop Arm Violations Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Code Enforcement Seat Belt Overweight Vehicles Miscellaneous Tags TOT;iL A/)ULT 9 8 1 5 0 38 4 1 13 0 2 0 4 0 9 0 0 44 1 1 0 3 0 151 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 -617- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT DECMEBER 2002 Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Window Tint Miscellaneous TOTAL WARR3LNT A/{RESTS Felony Misdemeanor A~ult 18 14 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 27 81 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -618- Properb/Class Class Extension Mound Police Department Oate Reported BETWEEN 11126102 and 12/31102 and Stolen Value >=1 Sub Total: Record Type Loss Type Stolen Items Dollar Value 4 $1,407.00 4 $1,407.00 P - Personal Accessories Sub To~l: Stolen 1 $160.00 1 $160.00 Y - All Other SLIDE CAROUSELS Sub Total: Consumer Stolen Stolen I $300.00 1 $200.00 2 $500.00 A-Motor Vehicles Sub Total: Vehicle Stolen 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 T - Currency, Negotiable bonds MAIL* Sub Total: Stolen 1 $5.00 1 $5.0O 0 - Office Equipment Cellular Phone Sub Total' stolen 1 $100.oo 1 $100.00 R - Radio/TV/Sound Entertainment Sub Total: Stolen 1 $150.00 1 $150.00 Report TotaL... 11 $7,322.00 Licensed to Mound Police Depaeanent -619- Page I of 1 Property Value Report Property Class Class Extension Mound Police Department Date Recovered BETWEEN 11126102 and 12/31102 P - Personal Accessories Sub Total: Printed On: Record Type Loss Type Stolen Monday, January 13, 2003 Items Dollar Value 1 $160.00 1 $160.00 A - Motor Vehicles Sub Total: Vehicle Stolen 1 $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 Report Total.... 2 $5,160.00 Licensed to Mound Police Department -620- Page I of 1 Summary Report Total MOC Mound Police Department Date Arrived ~F. TWF_EN ~ ~12fd(~2 and 12/31102 Printed On: MOC Literal Transaction Monday, January 13, 2003 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 2 5 3 9 2 2 3 1 6 1 1 1 3 1 36 2 1 1 3 4 6 10 4 1 l 9000 9002 9004 9013 9018 9019 9021 9038 9040 9140 9200 9210 9220 9240 9312 9313 9430 9450 9451 9564 9566 9710 9720 9730 9731 9732 9740 9741 9750 9800 9801 9802 9804 9812 SPEEDING NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L RESTRICTED D/L J-OPEN BOTTLE EQUIPMENT VIOLATION J-EQIPMENT VIOLATION J-CARELESS/RECKLESS MISC CITATIONSfrKAFFIC NO SEATBELT NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS DAS/I)AK/DAC PLATE S/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED NO INSURANCE/pROoF OF CHANGE OF DOMICILE FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS FOUND PROPERTY PEKSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS H/K PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. DOG BARKING ANIMAL ENFOKCEMENT TICKETS MEDICAL/ASU MEDICAL/DOA MEDICALS MEDICALS/DX MEDICALS/CI MENTAL CASES 911 HANG UPS FIRES ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT PUBLIC ASSIST NOISE COMPLAINT TRESPASS NOTIFICATION LT Licensed to Mound Police Department Page 1 of 3 -621 - Offense Summary Report Totg MOC Mound Police Department Date Arrived BETWEEN 11126102 and 12/31102 Printed On: MOC Literal Transactio~ Monday, January 13, 2003 3 17 1 9 3 4 1 2 1 6 3 1 7 5 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 6 5 3 3 990O 9904 9912 9930 9932 9935 9944 9945 9953 9980 9990 9991 9992 9993 9994 A5352 A5353 AL351 AL352 AL354 AL454 Bl131 B3764 B4090 B4430 DA540 DC500 DH830 I2100 J3T01 JF501 JFF01 JG501 JGF01 ALL.HCCP CASES OPEN DOOR/ALARMS K-9 USED/REQUESTED HANDGUN PURCHASE GRANTED OFP VIO. CRIME CONTROL & LAW ENF CHILD CUSTODY ISSUES UNWANTED GUEST SUSPICIOUS PERSON CONDITIONAL RELEASE ORDERS WARRANTS MISC. VIOLATIONS J-MISC. VIOLATIONS MUTUAL AID/8100 MUTUAL AID/6500 MUTUAL AID/ALL OTHER ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC ASLT 5-MS-INFL OR ATTMPT I-IRM-HANDS-ADL STR DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FA]VI DOM ASLT-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FAM BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM ASSAULT BURG 3-UNOCC NILES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 4-AT FRC NRES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT BURG 4-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARU-UNK DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POS SES S-UNK-UNK CON SUB 5-FG PRSCR-SYN NARC-UNK CRM AGNST FAM-GM-ENDANGER CHLD-UNK INJURY TRAF-ACC-MS-UND AGE DRINK DRIVE-UNK-MOTOR VEH TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-U! ALCOHOL-MV TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI- 10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV Ucensed to Mound Police Department Page 2 of 3 -622- Summary Report Total MOC Mound Police Department Date Arrived BETWEEN 11126102 and 12/31102 Printed On: MOC IJterel Transaction Monday, January 13, 2003 GRAND TOTAL: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 255 LAA07 M3001 M4140 M5313 M5350 N0310 N3030 N3130 P2110 P3110 Q3226 TC029 TQ059 TR011 TR059 TR061 TR099 TR159 U0340 U1200 U255B VA021 X2200 X3080 CSC. 5-NO CONSENT CONT-UNK ASSA-I$ OLD-F JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER-UNDER 18 YRS LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 JUVENILE-CURFEW JUVENILE-RUNAWAY DISTUKBING PEACE-UNK- STALKING-UNKNOWN DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT DISTURB PEACE-MS-EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-LINK INTENT STLN PROP-MS-POSSESS-VEHICLES-2500-34999 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILD1NG-OTH PROP THEFT-251-500-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP THEFT-LESS 250-MS-FRM PERSON-MONEY THEFT-LESS 250-MS-YARDS-OTHR PROP THEFT-LESS 250-MS-MAILS-MONEY THEFT-LESS 250-MS-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP TI-IEFT-LESS 250-MS-MOTOR VEl-I-OTHER FRAUD-UNK LVL-TELECOMM SERVICES-UNK LOSS COMPUTER CRIM-FE-FRAUD ACT-UNK LOSS FRAUD-GM-FIN-TRAN-CARD-NO-CONSENT-251-2500 THEFT-FE-AUTO-MORE THAN 2500 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS Licensed to Mound Police Department Page 3 of 3 -623- Mound Police Department Date Cited BETWEEN 11126102 and 12/31102 Printed On: Citation Summary Offense Report Total Offense Offense Literal Transaction 37 9000 SPEEDING 3 9001 J-SPEEDING 3 9002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L , 2 9014 STOP SIGN 1 9020 CARELESS/RECKLESS 1 9030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 2 9038 MISC CITATIONS/TRAFFIC 2 9040 NO SEATBELT 6 9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 36 9140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS 10 9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED 1 9240 CHANGE OF DOMICILE ORAND TOTAL: 104 Monday, January 13, 2003 Licensed to Mound Police Department Page 1 of 1 -624- Case Status Report Un- MOC Total Founded Mound Police Department Ofc Offense Status Date BETWEEN 'HI26102 and 12/31/02 and Ofc Offense Code >=AO000 Printed On: Monday, January 13, 2003 Except- Cleared . Pending/ Total Ref. To 0th. GOA Assisted Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared Agen IUTL /Advised Other A5352 Total 1 A5353 Total l AL351 Total 4 percent AL352 Total 2 percent AL354 Total 1 percent AL454 ] percent Bll31 Total 1 percent B3764 Total 1 percent B4090 Total 1 percent B4430 Total ] percent DA540 Total 3 percent DC500 Total 4 percent ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 ASLT 5-MS-INFL OR ATTMPT HRM-HANDS-ADL STR 0 0 1 0 I 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM 0 0 3 1 3 0 0.00 0.00 75.00 25.00 75.00 0.00 ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC 0 0 2 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FAM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 DOM ASLT-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FAM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 BURG 1-OCC R.ES FRC-D-UNK W~AP-COM ASSAULT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 BURG 4-AT FRC NRES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 BURG 4-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1 0 0 0 0 0 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MAKU-~ 0 0 3 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 DRUGS -DRUG PARAPH-PO S SES S -UNK-UNK 0 0 4 0 4 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 CON SUB 5-FG PRSCR-SYN NARC-UNK 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Licensed to Mound Police Department Page 1 of 4 -625- Case Status Report Mound Police Department Ofc Offense Status Date BETWEEN 11/26/02 and 12/31102 and Ofc Offense Code >=A0000 Printed On: Monday, January 13, 2003 MOC Total Total I Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total Ref. To Oth. GOA Assisted Founded Cleared Arrest 'Inactive Cleared Agen /UTL /Advised 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Other percent I2100 Total 1 percent J3TOI Total 1 percent JFS01 Total 6 percent YFF01 Total 5 percent JG501 Total 3 percent JGFOI Total 3 percent ].,AA07 Total 1 percent M300I Total 2 M4140 Total 1 M5313 Tote/ 1 percent M5350 Total 2 percent N0310 Total I percent 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 CRaM AGNST FAM-GM-ENDANGER CHLD-UNK INJ-URY 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 lO0.O0 0.00 lO0.O0 0.00 TRAF-ACC-MS-UND AGE DRINK DRIVE-UNK-MOTOR VEH 0 0 ! 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 TRAF-AC-OM-3RD DEO DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 0 0 6 0 6 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV 0 0 5 0 5 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV 0 0 3 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI- 10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV 0 0 3 0 3 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 CSC 5-NO CONSENT CONT-UNK ASSA-18 OLD-F 1 0 0 0 0 0 lO0.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER-UNDER 18 YRS 0 0 2 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 JUVENILE-CURFEW 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 0 0 2 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 DISTURBING PEACE-UNK- STALKING-UNKNOWN 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ucensed to Mound Police Department Page 2 of 4 -626- Case Status Report Mound Police Department Ofc Offense Status Date BETWEEN ~125102 and 12/31102 and Dfc Offense Code >=AO000 Printed On: Monday, January 13, 2003 MOC Total Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total Ref, To Oth. GOA Assisted Founded Cleared Arrest 'Inactive Cleared Agen /UTL /Advised Other N3030 Total 1 pement N3130 Total 1 percent P2110 Total 1 percent P3110 Total 1 Q3226 Total 1 percent 1 percent TQ059 Total 2 percent TR011 Total 1 percent TR059 Total 1 percent TR06 l Total 1 percent TR099 Total 1 TR159 To~al 1 percent DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DISTURB PEACE-MS-EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 0 0 0 ! 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STLN PROP-MS-POSSESS-VEHICLES-2500-34999 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.O0 0.00 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-OTH PROP 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THEFT-251-500-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TI[EFT-LESS 250-MS-FRM PERSON-MONEY 1 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-YARDS-OTH~ PROP 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-MAILS-MONEY 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THEFT-LESS 2$0-MS-MOTOR VEH-O~R 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FRAUD-UNK LVL-TELECOMM SERVICES-UNK LOSS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Licensed to Mound Police Department Page 3 of 4 -627- Case Status Report Mound Police Department Ofc Offense Status Date BETWEEN 11126102 and 12/31102 and Ofc Offense Code >=A0000 Printed On: Monday, January 13, 2003 ~OC U1200 Total Un- Except- Founded Cleared Cleared Pending/ Total Ref. To Oth. GOA Assisted Arrest lnactive Cleared Agen /UTL /Advised COMPUTER CRIM-FE-FRAUD ACT-UNK LOSS Other Total 1 percent U255B Total 1 percent VA021 Total 2 percent X2200 Total 1 X3080 rota/ 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 FRAUD-GM-FIN-TRAN-CARD-NO-CONSENT-251-2500 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 THEFT-FE-AUTO-MORE THAN 2500 1 0 0 1 0 0 50.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS 0 0 1 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Total 69 4 0 47 18 47 0 0 0 0 5.80 0.00 68.12 26.09 68.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Licensed to Mound Police Department Page 4 of 4 -628- Page 1 of 2 Kandis Hanson From: To.' Sent: Subject: "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> "Kandis M. Hanson" <KandisHanson@cityofmound.com> Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:39 PM Fw: 2003 Updates fyi. Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 952-472-3190 - work 952-472-0620 - fax ..... Original Message ..... From: <Jim. Ford@co.hennepin.rnn. us> To: <davecal~,ci.osseo.mn.us>; <SHall~=~ci.saint-anthony.mn.us>; <~.i_r_s__c__h _~_ _ci._i_n_d~p_~__ncl_e_n_~ ~,.Ln___n_:~_s>; <~__o__o_r_s__e__~ _c~. ~ro_n___o__,rn~___,.u s__>; <gff_..d~._~_.__n_e_t_>; <sarah_smi~_cj_~_o__fiTo__ __o___tm__~_..c_o__m_>; Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:47 PM Subject: 2003 Updates The 2003 CDBG application process has begun and I wanted to share with you several updates. I had intended to get this off to you before the application went out, but I simply could not do so. Our workload has increased significantly (see below) and things do not always occur as planned. For those of you that may not have heard this before, our "Development Planning Unit" is still together, but we now constitute the "Housing Unit" of the County's new Housing, Community Works and Transit Department. I am pleased with what has been accomplished here and believe we w/Il be better able to assist area municipalities and residents than ever before. Many of you have already met with staff from our office and I understand several potential joint projects have been identified. I am hopeful that CDBG funding can be used in combination with other resources available through our office to assist these projects. You should also be aware that this department is staffing the Hennepin County HRA and has gotten involved in tax exempt bonds (TEB) for housing projects. If you have a project where TEB is being or may be requested by the developer, you may want to consider having the County HRA handle the application process. The HRA is also initiating a market study of the need for senior housing and whether County HRA assistance may be needed. The study is some months from being completed, but I will keep you informed. Because of our increasing workload, and the potential of budget cuts in the - 629- 1/23/2003 Page 2 of 2 future, we have been asked to identify how our program procedures could be streamlined. Among the proposals was that of having the Consolidated Pool applications mailed to the selection committee, having you review and rate them and only then meet to decide funding awards. In other words, drop the first meeting entirely. This is what is being done with both the HOME and AHIF programs and it seems to work. This may not offer substantial time savings, but one less meeting would probably be welcomed by all of you. Please get back to me with your thoughts on this proposal as we will probably implement this change unless there are objections. Jason Osberg will not be part of the committee this year, as he has taken a job in the private sector. I will miss Jason and appreciate his many contributions. If anyone has an idea of others who might be interested in being on the committee, I would certainly be open to any suggestions. I have just been informed today that the city of Dayton will be returning approximately $254,000 in funding previously allocated to the Dayton (mobile home) Park Community Center project. The city had been informed that CROSS, their partner in the project, had decided to relocate elsewhere. This funding will be wrapped in with the 2003 funds and could be used soon after the committee awards it in April, or could be awarded later. This means that the total Consolidated Pool amount will likely be more than $600,000. Jim Ford Hennepin County Housing, Community Works and Transit 417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1362 Telephone: 612/348-6013 Fax: 612/348-2920 -630- 1/23/2003 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 CITY OF MOUND PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com January 23, 2003 VFW Post 5113 2544 Commerce Blvd Mound, MN 55364 To Whom it May Concern: On behalf of the City of Mound, I would like to thank you for your donation of $2500.00 for shelter benches. Your continued support enables us to make improvements to City parks that would otherwise be impossible. Your generous gift is greatly appreciated and we will notify you when the shelter benches have been installed. Sin,cerely, ~/ i~m Fackler ~ f/'~ ~ Parks Director cc: Mayor, City Council, City Manager, POSAC CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 Received of ~//"',~ RECEIPT Date No. 51 75i Fund Object Dept. Amount Description ./0/ o, ¢ .~:?~:~,,,~;i~?'~':~'" .,..CHAMBERLAIN-GOUDY VFW POST #5113 '."~ '.'. '~'¥:" -;"~':'- ' :,' '. :. ' .' ~k~n ~k~ ~ ', :,' ": '. · .' ,' ',':'~.~?~.'7'.~'~'.~:'~'~':. '~ .:" .: '...'.952~72-3292 .:: :, ".. ",:'. ..~,,~ : ~.. . :t.,, , ~ ;. .,.. · .... ' .... ; .' ,..- ~.~. ,,/~,.;~'~,~ ,.- ~:'~, -, ~,~.~(~.~.~? ,~',~.~ .~..~.. ......... . .... . . .. , ,, ...... .. .... . ..... :,, ~,~..~ .... ,.~ ,, ,~. ~ ..... . ~ :~ ?':.'SHELTER BENCHES'?'. :' '.,,..' ,.' -.:'.'. J ....... ~ ,PARKS " ' ,,-' ....... ,' , . . ... . . .... .~ .... . ....:, ........ ~,,~',m~. ;.' .,:,.~q~?~:~. .',..,,~..' .:..~,.::._~ ,'DD~I,&8,' ':D~iI, ODDD~:SDS~,I,I,&58~,,' -632- '.