The URL can be used to link to this page

2003-07-08PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. COsti quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens; foster~g a Safe; attractive ana floufish~g cO~urfity. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 8, 2003 7:30 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item Will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. PAGE 1. OPEN MEETING o o PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: JUNE 24, 2003 REGULAR MEETING *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS *C. APPROVE ORDINANCE ADOPTING REZONING OF PROPERTIES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH M.S.S. *D. APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS CONSISTENT WITH M.S.S. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER) PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUATION CASE #03-24: BRUCE RENO 2851 TUXEDO BOULEVARD CUP AMENDMENT ACTION ON REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2705-2710 2711-2731 2732 2733-2734 2735-2744 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. o o 10. 11. 12. ACTION ON RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN BUILDINGS AS STRUCTURALLY SUBSTANDARD WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 CONSIDERATION/ACTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR SAFE AND SOBER COMMUNITIES PROGRAM CONDIERATION/ACTION DIRECTING STAFF REGARDING 2 A.M. BAR CLOSING INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Memo K-G: Changes to Eminent Domain Statutes B. Newsletter: Gillespie Center C. LMCD Correspondence D. Harbor Wine & Spirits Financials for June E. Sheriff's Report ADJOURN 2745-2747 2748 2749 2750-2751 2752-2753 2754-2787 2788 2789-2792 This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site. COUNCIL BRIEFING July 8, 2003 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! July 8 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting July 8 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting July 10 - 7:00 - Music in the Park July 22 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting July 22 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting July 24 - 7:00 - Music in the Park July 31 - 5:00 - Luau employee appreciation event Aug 7 - 7:00 - Music in the Park Upcoming Absences July 3-13 Kandis Hanson Vacation Aug 18 Kandis Hanson Vacation Ci~. Hall Closed July 4 Independence Day Sept 1 Labor Day HRA Jim Prosser of Ehlers & Associates will be present to answer any questions regarding his analysis of the Mound Harbor Renaissance Agreement. CITY COUNCIL Item #9 - Chief Kurtz will be present at the meeting to distribute a copy of the proposed grant agreement as requested. It was not received by the time of agenda printing. Human Resources Ron Gust of Delano started in his new position as Senior Liquor Clerk at Harbor Wine on July 1. act as a night shift supervisor, when so assigned. He will Six candidates will be interviewed for the Public Works Director/Engineering Coordinator on July 29. The day-long format for the selection of department heads will be followed, but without the public forum at the end of the day. The pool will be narrowed to two and those two will be re-interviewed on Aug 6. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 24, 2003 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kal Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Sr Gordon, Steve Kehn, Jim Sampson, Kris Lovaas, Davi( Howell, Jim Anderson, Skip and Heidi La Joy, Kristine Lovaas, David Zillian City Clerk Planner Loren iene Hostetler, Robert Tom Stokes, Consent Agenda: All items listed under the rOutine in nature by the Council and will be separate discussion on these items unless a which event the item will be removed from the normal sequence. Agenda are con,. to be !ed by a call vote. be no so uests, in and considered in 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel called the meeting to or 2. PLEDGE OF 3. APPROVE Hanson added added item from the ~dded it a., of July 30, 2003, at 11:00 a.m. asked for the removal of C3 the regular agenda. and by Hanus to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in 4. CONS MOTION b vote, all voted d by Osmek to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call on carried. A. Approve min~ s of the June 10, 2003 regular meeting. B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $391,037.65. C. Approve Planning Commission Recommendations 1. RESOLUTION NO. 03-58: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE OF 4.3 FEET FOR A NEW HOUSE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 4955 DONALD DRIVE, P&Z CASE #03-25, PID #24-117- 24-44-0145. 1 -2705- Mound City Council Minutes - June 25, 2003 2. RESOLUTION NO. 03-59: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A LAKESIDE SETBACK VARIANCE AND SETBACK FOR PROPERTIES IN THE B-1 DISTRICT WHICH ARE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES TO ALLOW FOR EXPANSION AT THE MOUND VFW LOCATED AT 2544 COMMERCE BOULEVARD. CASE #03-18, PID #23-117-24-11-0028. 3. (Case moved to item 7A) D. Approve payment request No. 4 to Dave Storm Sewer Improvements, in the amount E. Approve setting bid date for Lost Lake 11:00 a.m. Project f¢ h Inc., for 2002 30, 2003, at 5. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS NOT ON THE AGENDA. None were offered. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEM A. Case #02-20: Rezon' M.S.S. Loren Gordon expl~ inconsistencies ,ning and Com Jrpose existin! Consistent with propoSed revisions is to correct the of the prOperty as required by statute. Mayor Meisel o Jim chal a level expressed concerns over his property being I. Jim B 2627 Wilshi concerns possible la the zoninges vs. properties in the affected area and voiced changes. Gordon gave him clarification and explained plan changes. Chip Gray, 519( be kept Iow voice agreement with Sampson, that he desires the area to Mayor Meisel closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. Council discussion followed regarding the feasibility of changing these areas to high density when the proposed new development includes a lot of high density. It was suggested that it may be more feasible to change the comp plan to match the present zoning. There would have to be a new hearing set for this concept, along with legal notification. 2 -2706- Mound City Council Minutes - June 25, 2003 MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to recommend the comprehensive plan changes as proposed by staff. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to accept staff recommendation on the proposed rezoning, with the exception of the properties on Fairview and Chateau Lane. Upon roll call vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. Staff will prepare information on comprehensive plan properties on Fairview and Chateau Lane for Planning Co~ subsequent public hearing by Council. on the ion review, and B. Case #03-24: Gordon reviewed the conditional use permit Reno who are proposing to build a two-story would replace an existing deck. A new side of the addition. The request requires approved for the property in 1983. Bruce Reno - CUP Amendment ruce and Joan to the rear of th.me that :1 also e north CUP whi Mayor Meisel opened the public 9:15 Bruce Reno, 2851 Tuxedo, expressei another survey for the pr becau., really city rig he needed to present of his property is MOTION by Han! conded ~smek on July 8, 2003, the Motion carried. the public hearing until 7:30 p.m. can be resolved. All voted in favor. 7. PUl of the budget IPDATE Council on progress of the Public Safety Facility, schedule. Sandersor secor d by Hanus to accept the Iow bid for millwork from Wilke 646.00. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7A. CASE & HEIDI LAJOY: VARIANCES AT 1872 SHOREWOOD LN. The Planning Corn ;~on recommended approval of a 5' front yard variance and a 6' side yard variance. The La Joys wanted to appear before the Council to request the side yard variance be granted as applied for, which was a 4' setback, not 6'. After discussion, motion by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. Osmek stated that he feels that technically this should go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration, then he would support the request. The 3 -2707- Mound City Council Minutes - June 25, 2003 following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Meyer. The following voted against: Osmek. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-60: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE OF 5 FEET AND A SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE OF 2 FEET TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE/ADDITION AT 1872 LANE, P&Z CASE #03-22, PID #18-117-23-23-0025 8. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF MOUND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Meisel stepped down as Mayor for this discussion property in the proposed redevelopment area. ISSANCE ~er husband own Acting Mayor Hanus summarized the actior earlier the HRA m MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to ap developers agreement with MHR u luly 8, 20C following voted in favor: Brown, ant against: None. Mayor Meisel :lng. of the preliminary ow for further analysis. The ;r. The following voted Mayor Meisel returned to ide ove~ 9. PLANNING Case #03-23: Kri The Planning six foot solid wood Drive. .ovaas d( - Variance. of the request to allow construction of a foot front setback along Shoreline The ;ounty throw )w tight aga stated ti' no hardshi Police Dep~ nt to excess s David Zillian appeared before the Council to stress lng show that's ruining their landscaping and se. Zillian stated that the Planning Commission there's clearly hardship due to the negligence of the the speed limit, allowing the County plows to go travel at show up on their yard, to their house. After discussion, by Hanus, seconded by Meyer to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-61: RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR A SlX (6) FOOT FRONT YARD FENCE AT 2305 NORWOOD LANE, P&Z CASE #03-23, PID #13-117-24-44-0104. 4 -2708- Mound City Council Minutes - June 25, 2003 Mayor Meisel called for a 10 minute recess at 9:25 p.m. 10. ACTION DIRECTING THAT ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES WITHIN THE CSAH15/110 AND DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS BE RELOCATED OR PLACED UNDERGROUND ON PUBLIC PROPERTY MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. ThE following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-62: RESOLUTION DIRECTING DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES WITHIN THE CSAH REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS BE UNDERGROUND ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. -'LECTRIC ~ITOWN :ED 11. POLICE A. Consideration/Action on Chief Kurtz presented a proposed policy to the at work by City employees. at work prohibition of firearms MOTION by Brown, seconded by O information and monitor the situation. this to gather more carried. B. Consideration/Acti¢ Chief Kurtz Crown Victoria P! iterce budget to purchase a 2004 Ford MOTION by Meyer, Victoria the purchase of a 2004 Ford Crown ivor. Motion carried. ities Chief requested with the Police De execution of aqreement for Safe and Sober approve participation in a partnership agreement in a multiple agency Safe and Sober grant. MOTION by lack of a second resolution authorizing the agreement. Motion died for MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to table action on this agreement, and direct Chief Kurtz to supply the Council with a draft of the agreement and grant, for consideration at the next Council meeting. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. 5 -2709- Mound Council Minutes - June 25, 2003 12. ACTION ON CITY MANAGER'S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, INCLUDING SALARY. The Council went into Executive Session at 10:40 p.m. to discuss the City Manager's performance evaluation. The Council meeting reconvened at 11:00 pm. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the foil( voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Meyer. The Motion carried. ;olution. The following voted against: Osmek. RESOLUTION NO. 03-63: RESOLUTION BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND ~.GER KANDIS 12A. LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APP[ MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to ap submitted by the Mound Evan :ree Churc~ 6:00 to 10:00 p.m. All voted in ,n permit application on July 2, 2003, from 13. INFORMATIONIMISCELLANE( A. Correspon( B. Memo: 2 C. Newsl D. Re E. F. Corres G. LMCD 2003 Community Collaborative ge by the Bay adopts gas franchise fees 2003 Association Problem 14. ADJO MOTION by Motion carried. by Meyer to adjourn at 11:05 p.m. All voted in favor. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 6 -2710- JULY 8, 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 062503SU E $111,028.51JUNE 070203S U E$10,804.38 JULY 070803SUE $238,335.26JULY TOTAL $360,168.15 -2711- CITY OF MOUND Payments 06/23/03 2:37 PM Page I Current Period: June 2003 Batch Name 062503SUE User Dollar Amt Payments Computer Dollar Amt Refer 62503 BUSINARO, GINO Cash Payment Invoice 062503 Transaction Date G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 6/23/2003 $111,028.51 $111,028.51 $0.00 In Balance REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE Wells Fargo 10100 $203.67 Total $203.67 Refer 62503 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs STATE DEED FOR HANUS $25.00 Invoice 062503 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.00 Refer 62503 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 05-03 472-3555 $256.74 Invoice 062503 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $256.74 Refer 62503 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Tha~ BI 6139 EVERGREEN PROPERTY $391.00 Invoice 062503 Transaction Date 6/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $391.00 Refer 62503 MORAN, ALLAN AND LINDA Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 6139 EVERGREEN ROAD $108,614.42 Invoice 062503 Transaction Date 6/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108,614.42 Refer 62503 SKINNER, GREG Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $595.63 Invoice 062503 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $595.63 Refer 62503 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities 05-03 SERVICE $942.05 Invoice 062503 Transaction Date 6/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $942.05 -2712- CITY OF MOUND Payments 06/23/03 2:37 PM Page 2 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND Current Period: June 2003 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo $824.30 $256.74 $109,005.42 $942.05 $111,028.51 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $111,028.51 $111,028.51 -2713- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 7:43 AM Page I Current Period: July 2003 Batch Name 070203SUE User Dollar Amt $10,804.38 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $10,804.38 $0.00 In Balance Refer 70203 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $653.00 Invoice 55608-B Transaction Date 6/27/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $663.00 Refer 70203 lOS CAPITAL Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying 07-09-03 THRU 10-08-03 MAINTENANCE $99.75 Invoice 59160793 Transaction Date 6/27/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.75 Refer 70203 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PAA/) E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 #23 KESTNER, AL $34.34 Cash Payment Invoice 070203 Cash Payment Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 #22 HEITZ, DON $34.34 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells MAY19THRUJUNE18612-221-6740 BERENT, BRIAN $18.10 Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-221-6974 TAFFE, $15.74 JOHN Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-221-6812 #15 $145.46 FACKLER, JIM Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-221-6813 HOFF, $40.23 KATI E Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-221-8385 $34.32 SWARTZER, BRIAN Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-282-5889 $71.43 SIMONEAU, MATT Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-363-5883 $29.48 NORLANDER, JILL Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Ceils MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-292-1375 $6.86 WlDMER, DENICE Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-292-1375 $13.73 WIDMER, DENICE Invoice 070203 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells MAY 19 THRU JUNE 18 612-292-1375 $13.73 WlDMER, DENICE Invoice 070203 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $457.76 Refer 70203 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale LIQUOR $1,481.04 Invoice 271666-00-B -2714- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 7:43 AM Page 2 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment r: 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.08 Invoice 271296-00-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $67.60 Invoice 271075-00-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,621.55 Invoice 271074-00-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$67.95 Invoice 261365-000-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,036.94 Invoice 268634-00-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $643.76 invoice 268134-00-B Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,815.02 Refer 70203 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (FIR Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 06-25-03 GASOLINE CHARGES $259.42 Invoice 070203 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $259.42 Refer 70203 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (P/W E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 06-25-03 GASOLINE CHARGES $223.20 Cash Payment Invoice 070203 Payment invoice 070203 Cash Payment Invoice 070203 Transaction Date E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 06-25-03 GASOLINE CHARGES $651.82 E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 06-25-03 GASOLINE CHARGES $307.44 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,182.46 Refer 70203 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (POL Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 06-26-03 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,326.97 Invoice 070203 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,326.97 -2715- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 7:43 AM Page 3 Current Period: July 2003 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $1,899.04 $359.17 $47.09 $699.89 $321.17 $7,478.02 $10,804.38 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $10,804.38 $10,804.38 -2716- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02103 10:18 AM Page 1 Current Period: July 2003 Batch Name 070803SUE User Dollar Amt Payments Computer Dollar Amt Refer 70803 Cash Payment Invoice 8648-B Cash Payment Invoice 8648-B Cash Payment Invoice 8648-B Cash Payment Invoice 8648-B Transaction Date A+ CLEANING CONTRACTORS, IN E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services $238,335.26 $238,335.26 $0.00 In Balance 02-03 CLEANING SERVICE $1,260.96 E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-03 CLEANING SERVICE $38.34 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-03 CLEANING SERVICE $38.34 E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-03 CLEANING SERVICE $38.34 Invoice 8750 Cash Payment Invoice 8750 Cash Payment Invoice 8750 Cash Payment invoice 8767 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,375.98 Refer 70803 AAA NURSERY AND LANDSCAPIN Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials ARBURVITIES BY EXHAUST SHOP $500.00 Invoice 061603 Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials DIRT BY CEMETARY $225.00 Invoice 061703 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $725.00 Cash Payment ~. '~u-~-4.~'~uu-buu L;ap~taluuuay (L~bNbRA LIGHT SIGNAL MASTER, JET STROBE $465.76 PO 17775 E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LIGHT SIGNAL MASTER, JET STROBE $465.76 PO 17775 E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LIGHT SIGNAL MASTER, JET STROBE $465.76 PO 17775 E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery STROBE $131.00 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,528.28 Refer 70803 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise Fo; R ICE $63.36 Invoice 398317813 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $148.44 Invoice 387317417 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $210.00 Invoice 387317213 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $172.08 Invoice 387316710 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $171.60 Invoice 387318113 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $765.48 Refer 70803 ASPEN EMBROIDERYAND DESIG Cash Payment E 101-41500-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2003 ROBERTS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $35.00 Invoice 062403 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $22.00 Invoice 062403 -2717- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 2 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment $22.00 Invoice 062403 Cash Payment $22.00 Invoice 062403 Cash Payment $68.40 Invoice 062403 Transaction Date 71112003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $169.40 Refer 70803 BECKMAN, SCOTT Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LIGHT FEE $10.50 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 613012003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.50 Refer 70803 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS E 601.49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE CLOTHING ALLOWANCE SIMONEAU, MATT $468.39 $1,821.60 $1,717.05 $1,258.20 10100 Total $5,265.24 Invoice 37198800 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 26751100 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale. Invoice 26702800 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 26758200 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 LIQUOR LIQUOR LIQUOR Wells Fargo Refer 70803 BROWN, JIM CULTURED SOD FAR Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 7949 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 YARDS OF SOD Wells Fargo $145.69 10100 Total $145.69 Refer 70803 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment Invoice N13067 Cash Payment Invoice N13067 Cash Payment Invoice N13067 Transaction Date Rear E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 6/30/2003 70803 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment Invoice 070803 Transaction Date E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 6/30/2003 MINIATURE BULB MINIATURE BULB MINIATURE BULB Wells Fargo 05-16-03 THRU 06-17-03 SERVICE Wells Fargo 10100 10100 Total Total $5.28 $5.28 $5,27 $15.83 $17.57 $17.57 Refer 70803 CHAMPION AUTO Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice D202368 Cash Payment E 601.49400-230 Shop Materials Invoice D202368 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice D202368 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 051303 GAUGE WIRE GAUGE WIRE GAUGE WIRE OILFILTER $24,14 $24.14 $24.14 $6.75 -2718- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 3 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials OIL FILTER $6.75 Invoice 051303 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials OIL FILTER $6.74 Invoice 051303 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery DUTY PADS, BRAKE CLEAN $138.40 invoice D200582 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair MIS W25OOP $14.90 Invoice D200824 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair TIRE CRAYON $10.63 Invoice D202193 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $256.59 Refer 70803 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $399.48 Invoice 63457126 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $415.80 Invoice 63452135 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $356.68 Invoice 63423193 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,171.96 Refer 7811 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN ~ment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair SPARK PLUG $32.65 Invoice 581417 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.65 Refer 70803 DANIELS, ROSEMARY Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REIMBURSE DOCK FEE $215.00 invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $215.00 Refer 70803 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 224165 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 224156 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo $18,40 $2,097.55 10100 Total $2,115.95 Refer 70803 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials CREDIT-PAINT -$92,64 Invoice 070302 Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials REPAIR SWITCH $133.78 Invoice 802046527 Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials WHITE TRAFFICE PAINT $145.69 Invoice 802047172 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186.83 Refer 70803 DOSSETT, SINDI Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs HRA MEETING VIDEO TAPE $20.00 Invoice 070803 Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00 Refer 70803 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE -2719- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 4 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$50.00 Invoice 415704 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $22.50 Invoice 414209 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,047.80 Invoice 414208 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $303.50 Invoice 412521 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,423.10 Invoice 418483 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,746.90 Refer 70803 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment E 360-47000-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 BOND SALE $990.00 Invoice 20907 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 BOND SALE $410.00 Invoice 20907 Cash Payment E 355-47000-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 BOND SALE $700.00 Invoice 20907 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 05-03 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT $2,587.50 Invoice 20908 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 05-03 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT $187.50 Invoice 20909 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,875.00 Refer 70803 EXCELSIOR, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training IIMC CONFERENCE RITTER, BONNIE $30.00 Invoice 070803 Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training IIMC CONFERENCE RAHN, JODI $30.00 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.00 Refer 70803 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $64.00 invoice 130065 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $64.00 Invoice 127163 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $128.00 Refer 70803 FETTER, DOUGLAS AND WENDY Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REIMBURSE DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 070803 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REIMBURSE LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 70803 FIRE CONTROL EXTINGUISHER Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies ANNUAL SERVICE CALL $374.90 Invoice 063003 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $374.90 Refer 70803 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSOC MINN -2720- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Pacje 5 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2000 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE $85.64 Invoice 48609 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85.64 Refer 70803 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-17-03 UNIFORMS $26.99 Invoice 606441 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-17-03 UNIFORMS $26.99 Invoice 606441 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-17-03 UNIFORMS $27.00 invoice 606441 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 06-17-03 MATS $23.31 Invoice 606441 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 06-17-03 MATS $23.31 Invoice 606441 -Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 06-17-03 MATS $23.31 Invoice 606441 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 06-24-03 MATS $50.47 Invoice 613274 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 06-24-03 MATS $55.50 Invoice 613275 ;ash Payment 06-24-03 MATS $77.16 ,ice 613276 Cash Payment 06-24-03 MATS $40.04 Invoice 613272 Cash Payment 06-24-03 UNIFORMS $30.14 Invoice 613273 Cash Payment 06-24-03 UNIFORMS $30.14 invoice 613273 Cash Payment 06-24-03 UNIFORMS $30.14 Invoice 613273 Cash Payment 06-24-03 MATS $29.98 Invoice 613273 Cash Payment 06-24-03 MATS $29.98 Invoice 613273 Cash Payment 06-24-03 MATS $29.98 Invoice 613273 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo' 10100 Total $554.44 Refer 70830 GALLS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies LATEX GLOVES $67.01 Invoice 5648957400014 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves FLAIR CONTAINERS $93.65 Invoice 5641475200013 PO 17999 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $160.66 Refer 70803 GREEN WlTH ENVY LAWN CARE Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials SIDEWALK WEED CONTROL $799~82 Invoice 3679 Fransaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $799.82 Refer 70803 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials -2721 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 6 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $8,364.07 Invoice 734613 Cash Payment WINE $2,043.25 Invoice 734612 Cash Payment LIQUOR $3,542.42 invoice 731127 Cash Payment WINE $542.43 Invoice 731126 Cash Payment WINE $705.'36 Invoice 730787 Cash Payment WINE $0.00 Invoice 730784 Cash Payment CREDIT-LIQUOR -$15.12 Invoice 615557 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$28.94 Invoice 615641 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$64.16 Invoice 615947 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$181.95 Invoice 615458 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,907.36 Refer 70803 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals CHLORINE AND HYDROFLUOSlLICIC ACID $1,401.13 Invoice 531750 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,401.13 Refer 70803 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 05-03 BOOK FEE $1,004.84 Invoice 053103 Transaction Date 6/27/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,004.84 Refer 70803 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R Cash Payment E 101-41600.450 Board of Prisoners 05-03 ROOM AND BOARD $2,309.75 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,309.75 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Refer 70803 Cash Payment Invoice 070803 Transaction Date Rear 70803 Cash Payment invoice 070803 Cash Payment Invoice 070803 Cash Payment Invoice 070803 Cash Payment Invoice 070803 Cash Payment Invoice 070803 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER( _ E 101.41550-440 Other Contractual Servic 2003 ASSESSOR SERVICES 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs E 101.42400-300 Professional Srvs E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs E 101.42400-300 Professional Srvs 58 MAILING UNITS 51 MAILING UNITS 102 MAILING UNITS 68 MAILING UNITS 38 MAILING UNITS E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10100 Total $83,098.45 $83,098.45 $72.50 $63.75 $127.50 $85.OO $47.50 -2722- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 7 Current Period: July 2003 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 78 MAILING UNITS $97.50 Cash Payment Invoice 070803 Cash Payment Invoice 070803 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 48 MAILING UNITS $60.00 E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA OFFICE FURNITURE E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA OFFICE FURNITURE E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA OFFICE FURNITURE Transaction Date 6~2712003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $553.75 Refer 70803 HOFF, KA TIE Cash Payment E 281-45210-210 Operating Supplies REIMBURSE DIGITAL CAMERA $133.13 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/27/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $133.13 Refer 70803 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $195.00 invoice 307688 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $195.00 Refer 70803 HOMEBASE OFFICE FURNITURE, I Cash Payment $1,059.07 Invoice 061903 Cash Payment $1,059.07 Invoice 061903 Cash Payment $1,059.07 !nvoice 061903 Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,177.21 Refer 70803 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies TONER FOR FAX $119.80 Invoice 2331452A Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 06-24-03 THRU 07-24-03 COPIER $137.69 MAINTENANCE Invoice 23807444 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.49 Refer 70803 INTERSTATE BA TTERY SYSTEM 0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERIES $119.17 Invoice 133751 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $119.17 Refer 70803 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$9.65 Invoice 225200 Cash Payment E 609.49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$9.65 Invoice 225199 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$34.50 Invoice 225198 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 225197 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$6.90 Invoice 224560 oCash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $827.50 nvoice 1577265 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $965.80 Invoice 1577264 -2723- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 8 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,229.20 Invoice 1577263 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $143.60 Invoice 1574059 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $0.00 Invoice 1574058 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $545.39 Invoice 1574057 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,642.34 Refer 70803 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 05-03 HRA MEETING $99.00 Invoice 56846-A Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 05-03 REDEV PROJECT AREA #1 $632.50 Invoice 56846-B Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 05-03 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $87.50 Invoice 56846-C Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 05-03 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT $302.50 Invoice 56846-D Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,121.50 Refer 70803 KURTZ, JAMES Cash Payment E 101-42110-205 Computer Software REIMBURSE KEYBOARD EXPENSE $133.48 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $133.48 Refer 70803 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 101-41500-351 Legal Notices Publishing SUMMARY FINANCIAL REPORT $549.24 Invoice 666 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 06-28-03 TIF DISCLOSURE $51.74 Invoice 690 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $600.98 Refer 70803 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply - ADAPTOR, SCREWS, ETC $94.68 Invoice 047297 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts DRIVE SHAFT ASSEMBLY $185.46 Invoice 047577 Transaction Date 6/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $280.14 Refer 70803 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$1.00 Invoice 525647-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,786.30 Invoice 555319 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,320.00 Invoice 555318 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $37.00 Invoice 553466 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $8,171.30 I~voice 553465 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,313.60 -2724- CITY OF OUND P~¥ri'lent$ 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page g Current Period: July 2003 Refer 70803 MCKINLEY, JOHN Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE SEMINAR $200.77 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.77 Refer 70803 METRO FIRE E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment LENS, ETC $66.43 Invoice 13434 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies NOZZLE WITH PISTOL GRIP $367.63 Invoice 13360 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wefts Fargo 10100 Total $434.06 Refer 70803 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEM Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies INK JET LABELS, ETC $223.26 Invoice 38826 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $223.26 Refer 70803 MIDWESTASPHALTCORPORATIO Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials DUMP CHARGE $50.00 Invoice 48905MB Transaction Date 71112003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA E 609-4975~-~ Repai------rs/Uaint Buil-~din~s 05-19-03 WINDOW WASHING $37.28 Invoice 615005581 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.28 Refer 70803 MINNESOTA PLAYGROUND, INCO Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply TENNIS NETS $766.80 Invoice 2003122 PO 17774 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply PLAYCURBS $324.83 Invoice 2003138 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,091.63 Refer 70803 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals COLIFORM, MF - WATER $72.50 Invoice 171343 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.50 Refer 70803 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS, Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies FOUNTAIN ASSEMBLY $204.00 Invoice 20834 PO 17779 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $204.00 Refer 70803 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Cash Payment E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 04-03 FD ERROR $37.50 Invoice 070803 Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 05-03 DRILLS $923.00 Invoice 070803 Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 05-03 SALARY $3,763.25 nvoice 070803 Payment E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 05-03 MAINTENANCE $880.00 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,603.75 -2725- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 10 Current Period: July 2003 Refer 70803 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 06-03 FIRE RELIEF $9,361.66 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 7/2/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9 361.66 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-03 MUSIC SERVICES $92.90 Invoice A388113 Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings INSTALL CCTV SYSTEM $9,749.01 Invoice 120854 Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings ADDITIONAL LEASED EQUIP $207.68 Invoice 120820 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,049.59 Refer 70803 NATIONAL WATERWORKS Cash Payment G 601-16325 Distribution System HYDRANT EXTENSION KIT $365.17 Invoice 9474250 Project F Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials STREET SIGNS $10.09 Invoice TI-0107204 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply X-TUBES UPRIGHT $18.95 Invoice TI0105238 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29.04 Refer 70803 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 05-19-03 THRU 06-18-03 CELL PHONES $473.48 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/27/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $473.48 Refer 70803 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY, I Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies EYE WASH $244.44 Invoice PO68288500011 PO 17781 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $244.44 Refer 70803 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPP Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts WATER METER $1,353,07 Invoice 3172406 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials WIRE STAFF FLAG $14.48 Invoice 3175848 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,367.55 Refer 70803 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$88.00 Invoice 8008712 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $19.95 Invoice 8008504 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,802.49 Invoice 8008503 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$68.00 Invoice 8008338 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$80.00 Invoice 8008337 -2726- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 11 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$41.00 Invoice 8008335 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $40.00 Invoice 8008327 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $623.00 invoice 8008144 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,208.44 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $69.50 Invoice 962760 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $654.70 Invoice 962759 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $756.20 Invoice 962758 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,069.00 Invoice 960456 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $82.53 invoice 960455 Refer 70803 Transaction Date ~7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,631.93 Refer 70803 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Payment $683.23 20006 Cash Payment $71.90 Invoice 19512 Cash Payment $366.62 Invoice 19498 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,121.75 Refer 70803 PRESS NEWS PUBLICATIONS Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising 05-26-03 EMPLOYMENT AD $88.20 Invoice 02529893-001 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $88.20 Refer 70803 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARE']-FES E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $323.06 Invoice 276589-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $197.69 Invoice 276525-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $167.03 Invoice 276304-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,292.06 invoice 276303-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,382.09 Invoice 276112-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $261.31 Invoice 274284-00 ;ash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $27.00 Invoice 273677-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,532.38 Invoice 273676-00 -2727- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 12 Current Period: July 2003 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101-4t910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 06-24-03 REPLACE LAMPS $95.00 Invoice 062503 Transaction Date 6/27/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.00 Refer 70803 RANDY'S SANITATATION Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 06-03 GARBAGE SERVICE $114.54 Invoice 1718 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $114.54 Cash Payment I:: 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-03 BURGLARY SYSTEM $20.18 Invoice 318673 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-03 FIRE SYSTEM $23.38 Invoice 318673 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-03 ANNUAL TEST/INSPECTION $10.65 Invoice 318673 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.21 Refer 70803 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 05-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $7,887.33 invoice 0102031 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,887.33 Refer 70803 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment E 222-42260-350 Printing LETTERHEAD AND ENVELOPES $201.91 Invoice 64704 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising FLYERS 07-04-03 $272.53 Invoice 64731 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $474.44 Refer 70803 SPENCER, DAN Cash Payment R 101-34110 Depot Rental REIMBURSE DEPOT FEE $50.00 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 70803 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities PHOTO CELL $87.00 Invoice 7156 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 120 VOLT TIES LOCK $252.88 Invoice 7150 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $339.88 Refer 70803 STONE, MARK AND VAL Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND WATER/SEWER $161.22 Invoice 070803 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $161.22 Refer 70803 STREICHER'S Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves HANDCUFF KEY $6.28 Invoice 342830.2 PO 17558 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6.28 -2728- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 13 Refer 70803 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$23.90 Invoice 299889-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,460.40 Invoice 301414 Cash Payment BEER $672.50 Invoice 260540 Cash Payment BEER $61.16 Invoice 301413 Cash Payment BEER $6,800.15 Invoice 301417 Cash Payment BEER $557.20 Invoice 300672 Cash Payment BEER $7,581.60 Invoice 300671 Cash Payment BEER $52.60 Invoice 300670 Cash Payment BEER $311.88 Invoice 260309 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18,473.59 70803 TRUE VALUE, MOUND Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $88.60 Invoice 053103 Cash Payment $349.34 Invoice 053103 Cash Payment $65.62 Invoice 053103 Cash Payment $29.31 Invoice 053103 Cash Payment $118.44 invoice 053103 Cash Payment $110.77 Invoice 053103 Cash Payment $214.43 Invoice 053103 Cash Payment $93.13 Invoice 053103 Cash Payment $11.62 Invoice 053103 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,081.26 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609.49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply E 602.49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply E 101-45200-220 RepaidMaint Supply E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 05-03 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Refer 70803 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.91 invoice 390905-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.91 Invoice 390905-0 ;ash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.91 ~ice 390905-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.91 Invoice 390905-0 -2729- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 14 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 390905-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 390905-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 390905-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 390905-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 390905-0 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391650-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391219-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 390484-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 391374-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 390216-0 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 4X6 NOTES COPY PAPER INK JET CARTRIDGE MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE Wells Fargo 10100 $11.91 $3.97 $3.97 $5.96 $5.95 $0.00 $33.9'7 $63.88 $2.29 $2.29 $2.29 $2.29 $2.29 $0,76 $0.76 $1.14 $1.15 $149.81 Total $342.32 Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING BECK, KEN $104.36 Invoice 179997 PO 17811 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $104.36 Refer 70803 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $280.05 Invoice 7181-00 Transaction Date 7/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $280.05 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials ZEP-O-SHINE $94.31 Invoice 57020759 -2730- CITY OF MOUND Payments 07/02/03 10:18 AM Page 15 Current Period: July 2003 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials ZEP-O-SHINE $94.31 Invoice 57020759 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials ZEP-O-SHINE $94.30 Invoice 57020759 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies PAPER TOWELS $236.61 invoice 57022076 Transaction Date 6/30/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $519,53 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 355 2003-C G.O. TIF 1-2 360 2001-A G.O. Bonds 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $100,572.56 $6,806.55 $616.13 $700.00 $990.00 $684.24 $7,887.33 $6,085.18 $2,828.65 $101,802.96 $9,361.66 $238,335.26 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $238,335.26 $238,335.26 -2731 - CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE #04-2003 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING THE MOUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City of Mound does ordain: The City of Mound Zoning Map is hereby revised as follows: PID Property Address Previous Zoning Revised To: 1311724220270 5551 Three Points Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220269 5555 Three Points Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220268 5553 Three Points Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220267 5551 Three Points Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220251 1790 Commerce Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220261 1766 Commerce Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220260 1760 Commerce Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220259 1762 Commerce Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220258 1764 Commerce Blvd. B-2 R-3 1311724220257 1766 Commerce Blvd. B~2 R-3 1311724230052 1816 Commerce Blvd. R-1 R-3 1311724230047 1824 Commerce Blvd. R-1 R-3 1311724230046 1822 Commerce Blvd. R-1 R-3 1311724230045 1818 Commerce Blvd. R-1 R-3 1311724230044 1816 Commerce Blvd. R-1 R-3 1311724320030 2020 Commerce Blvd. R-2 R-3 1311724320117 2116 Commerce Blvd. R-1 B-1 1311724320123 2117 Fern Road R-1 R-3 1311724440094 4804 Northern Road B-2 R-3 1311724440072 4828 Edgewater Road B-2 R-1 The Zoning Map of the City of Mound on file with the City Clerk is hereby amended in accordance with these zoning provisions. Passed by the City Council this 8th day of July, 2003. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Published in The Laker the 19th day of July, 2003, Effective the 20~h day of July, 2003 -2732- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03-._ A RESOLUTION ADOPTING LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS GUIDED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, during the implementation of the Zoning Map as prescribed in Minnesota Statutes Section 473, the City has determined that land use plan changes are appropriate; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held official public hearings on June 3, 2002 and July 15, 2002, pursuant to Chapter 462 Section 355 Subdivision 2 of the Minnesota Statutes to allow formal public comment on proposed comprehensive plan amendments; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after careful study and after its public hearing has recommended to the City Council, the following comprehensive plan amendments: PID Property Address From Current Comp Plan To proposed Comp Plan 1311724230048 1838 Commerce Blvd. Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential 1311724230005 1806 Commerce Blvd. Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential 1311724230027 1910 Commerce Blvd. Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential 1311724230029 5574 Sherwood Dr. Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential 1411724140002 1801 Commerce Blvd. High Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial 1311724440094 4804 Northern Road Low Density Residential High Density Residential 1311724440051 4805 Bartlett Blvd. Low Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial 1311724440052 4801 Shoreline Blvd. Low Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial 1311724440053 4809 Bartlett Blvd. Low Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial 1311724440055 4823 Bartlett BIvd. Low Density Residential Neighborhood Commercial ; and, WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearing on June 24, 2003, to consider the Planning Commission recommendations; and, WHEREAS, the City Council after careful study, has concurred with the Planning Commission recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan amendments; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the Land Use Plan amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as described above are adopted. ! -2733- Resolution No. 0~__ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval is subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of July, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2734- 5341 Maywood Road Mour~d, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director 7/1/2003 Planning Case No. 03-24 - CUP Amendment (Reno) Summary At its June 24, 2003 meeting, the City Council continued the public hearing for review of the conditional use permit amendment request fi.om Bruce Reno to allow an addition at 2851 Tuxedo Boulevard to allow additional time to research the fight-of-way issue associated with the property. Based on review of the original plat for Avalon and the half-section maps from Hennepin County, it is the determination of City staff`that the property in question is not owned by the applicant as shown on the survey dated April 23, 2003 and is actually dedicated road right-of-way. Attachments · Survey dated April 23, 2003 - Otto & Associates, Inc. · Avalon original plat · Hennepin County half-section map · Hennepin County property information · June 24, 2003 City Council meeting minute excerpts (draft) · Resolution (draft) -2735- I I I // ~ / ',4. I I I I / / ~ I I I I ! ! 273~- i · ~a,7 _yv./~r 7¢ NO 7 VA V D (3 7) 15.97 2 f37.02 26.75 12 13 -2738- Property lnlOrmation Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 oI 2 Property Information Search Result The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9.' l S p. m. (CST) Search By: [D AddreSs Addition Name HOUSE or BUILDING #: STREET NAME: at least first 3 characters) Tuxedo I UNIT # (if applicable) Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2003 Click Here for State Copy of Payable 2003 Tax Statement 19-117-23-31-0i19 2851 TUXEDO BLVD MOUND 277 Construction year: 1984 3 Parcel Size: SE 60X1 BRUCE R & JOAN G RENO BRUCE R & JOAN G RENO 2851 TUXEDO BLVD MOUND MN 55364 ~ records per page Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value an warranted to represent arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Tax Parcel Description AVALON 009 LOT 1 AND NELY 45 FT OF LOTS 14 AND 15 INCL ADJ 1/2 OF VAC GLAMORGAN RD EX ST Abstract or Torrens: TORRENS Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2003 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2002 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $123,000 $102,000 $102,000 $1,045.22 $19.36 $1,064.58 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2003 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2002 -2739- Property lnI0rmatlon Search by Street Address Result page Values: Land Market l~u~ltl~ng Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status · $29,5O0 $93,500 $123,000 $24,500 $77,500 $102,000 RESIDENTIAL- ZERO LOT LINE HOMESTEAD 2377 Page 2 oI 2 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Have a tax related question? Send e-mail to taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Experience a problem searching database, have a technical question or wish to co Hennepin County Tax web site? Send e-mail to Don. Kopel@co.hennepin.mn.us Have a comment on any of Hennepin County's web sites or E-Commerce applicati e-mail to Henn. Net@co.hennepin.mn.us Copyright © 1998 -2001 Hennepin County -2740- Hennep~n County Map Server Page 1 ot 1 Click or} map ~o view ir~'brmafion on adjoining properties Scroll down to sec property address? value & tax inlb Last update: 6/03/2003 at 1:00:00 PM READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Proper't~ iD Approxima%e Approximate Property Perimeter Property Area 1~-~ 17-2~1-0~ ~ ~ ~87 R. 8,20~ sq.R. = 0.188 a¢~es Property Address Mm.rket Valuo. Total Tax (2003) 2851 TUXEDO BLVD MOUND, MN 55364 $ 123,000 $ 1,064.58 Click ,:m Property Infom~ation Button below to view main la × :i ~'~ br:I~;!tt:i (m pag t'~ Ib:r i]~c p:ro per[y y o u ha, c se lccled The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this tnformation or its derivatives, Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612) 34.8-2618 or via e-mail at Bob. Moulder(~.co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution, This application requires Internet Explorer 3,02 or Netscape 2,01 or later version for proper' operation. Copyright © 2003 Hennepin County -2741 - Mound City Council Minutes - June 25, 2003 MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to recommend the comprehensive plan changes as proposed by staff. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to accept staff recommendation on the proposed rezoning, with the exception of the properties on Fairview and Chateau Lane. Upon roll call vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. Staff will prepare information on comprehensive plan properties on Fairview and Chateau Lane for Planning Cot subsequent public hearing by Council. B. Case #03-24: Bruce Reno - CUP Amendment Gordon reviewed the conditional use permit Reno who are proposing to build a two-story would replace an existing deck. A new side of the addition. The request requires approved for the property in 1983. :ions on the ~on review, and submitte( to the rear of :1 also CUP ~ruce and Joa~~ me that e north Mayor Meisel opened the public 3:15 p.n Bruce Reno, 2851 Tuxedo, expresse~ another survey for the pr becau,, really city rigl he needed to present of his property is MOTION by Hant on July 8, 2003, Motion carried. conded the public hearing until 7:30 p.m. can be resolved. All voted in favor. 7. PUl Don the budget UPDATE Council on progress of the Public Safety Facility, schedule. Sandersor by Hanus to accept the Iow bid for millwork from Wilke 646.00. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7A. CASE & HEIDI LAJOY: VARIANCES AT 1872 SHOREWOOD LN. The Planning Com 3n recommended approval of a 5' front yard variance and a 6' side yard variance. The La Joys wanted to appear before the Council to request the side yard variance be granted as applied for, which was a 4' setback, not 6'. After discussion, motion by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. Osmek stated that he feels that technically this should go back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration, then he would support the request. The 3 -2742- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY ADDITION TO THE ATTACHED TWINHOME LOCATED AT 2851 TUXEDO BOULEVARD P & Z CASE # 03-24 WHEREAS, the applicants, Bruce and Joan Reno have submitted a request to amend their conditional use permit to allow construction of an addition to the rear of their twinhome located at 2851 Tuxedo Boulevard; and WHEREAS, as set forth in City Code Section 350:640, twin homes are allowed in the R-2 District by conditional use; and WHEREAS, the original conditional use permit was approved in 1983 following adoption of Resolution 83-41 which allowed construction of the structure containing the (2) twin home unit(s); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its June 2,.2003 meeting and voted unanimously to recommend Council approval as recommended by Staff subject to the following condition: 1. An updated survey and hardcover calculation sheet be submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the conditional use permit amendment subject to the conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission. This conditional use permit is approved for the following legally described property: See Exhibit A. -2743- The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted July 8, 2003 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2744- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03-.__ RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN BUILDINGS AS STRUCTURALLY SUBSTANDARD WITHIN PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound (the "Authority") have previously established Development District No. 1 ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and intends to establish a redevelopment tax increment financing district within the Project CTIF District"). 1.02. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10(d), the City and/or Authority are authorized to designate parcels as occupied by structurally substandard buildings prior t o demolition or removal o f t he buildings, and include such parcels i n a redevelopment t ax increment financing district after demolition, subject to certain terms and conditions as described in this resolution. 1.03. The Authority has determined a need to designate the parcel described in Exhibit A (the "Designated Parcel") as structurally substandard prior to establishment of the TIF District. .Section 2. Buildinqs Designated Substandard; Other Proceedinqs. 2.01. The City finds that the building on the Designated Parcel as described in Exhibit A is structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearanCe, based upon the analysis of the building by LHB Engineers & Architects dated on file in City Hall. 2.02. After the date of approval of this resolution, the building on the Designated Parcel may be demolished or removed by the City and/or Authority, or such demolition or removal may be financed by the City and/or Authority, or may be undertaken by a developer under a development agreement with the City and/or Authority. 2.03. The City and Authority intend to include the Designated Parcel in a redevelopment tax increment financing district, and to file the request for certification of such district with the Hennepin County auditor within three years after the building demolition. 2.04. Upon filing the request for certification of the new tax increment financing district, the City and/or Authority will notify the Hennepin County auditor that the original tax capacity of the Designated Parcel on which a structurally substandard building was demolished or removed before establishment of the district must be adjusted to reflect the SJB-205493vl WE175-4 -2745- greater of (a) the current net tax capacity of the parcel, or (b) the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the building was demolished or removed, but applying class rates for the current year, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. lO(d). 2.05. City staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, this 8~ day of July, 2003. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk JBD-234001v1 2 MU195-2 -2746- EXHIBIT A That part of Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision Number 170, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of said Lot distant 50.65 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; thence North along the West line of said Lot to the Northwest corner thereof; thence Eastedy along the Northerly line of said Lot a distance of 40.1 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of. said Lot a distance of 60 feet; thence at a right angle East 10 feet; thence at a right angle South 5.5 feet, more or less to a point 50.2 feet North of the South line of said Lot; thence Westerly in a straight line to the point of beginning; ALSO That part of Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision Number 170, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 8; thence Easterly along the Northerly line of said Lot a distance of 40.1 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Lot a distance of 60 feet; thence at a right angle East 10 feet; thence at a right angle South 5.5 feet, more or less to a point 50.2 feet North of the South line of said lot, said point being the actual point of beginning of the trace of land to be described; thence continuing South along the last described course 50.2 feet to the South line of said Lot; thence West along the South line of said Lot to the Southwest corner thereof, thence North along the West line of said Lot a distance of 50.65 feet; thence Easterly in a straight line to the actual point of beginning, including vacated portion of road, adjoining the above described tracts. ALSO: Lot 4, McNaught's Addition to "Mound", Lake Minnetonka, EXCEPT the South 29.3 feet thereof; including vacated portion of road adjoining the above described property. JBD-234001vl MU195-2 -2747- RESOLUTION AUTHORJZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMEN-T Be it resolved that the Mound Police Department enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety for the project entitled SAFE & SOBER COMMUNITIF. S during the period from October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2004. The Mound Chief of PoliCe is hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Mound Police Department. Be it further resolved that the Chief of the Orono Police Department is hereby authorized to be the fiscal agent and administer this grant on behalf of the Mound Police Department. I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the Mound City Council of Mound, Minnesota on ,2003. SIGNED: WITNESSETH: (Signature) (Signature) (Title) (Title) (Date) (Date) -2748- July 2, 2003 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound,com TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BONNIE RITTER RE: 2 A.M. BAR CLOSING As you are probably aware, the 2003 Legislative Session passed legislation to allow for the sale of alcoholic beverages on the liquor licensed premises until 2:00 a.m. on all days of the week effective July 1, 2003. Licensees need to apply for a special 2:00 a.m. license from the State and pay a fee based on their previous annual 12 months of liquor receipts. The VFW, American Legion, Al & Alma's, House of Moy, and Carbone's are the licensed on-sale establishments in the City of Mound at the present time. Mound's City Code reads as follows regarding hours of operation: Subd. 8. Hours of Operation. Every room, place, or premiseS where liquor is permitted to be sold, including cafe, restaurant, or dining room operated in connection therewith, pursuant to an On-Sale license, shall be closed and kept closed to the public during the times when a sale of liquor is prohibited by State law. During said hours, no person or persons shall be allowed to be or remain within such room, place or premises, for any purpose whatsoever, except that the owner or licensee, his or her agents, servants, or employees, may be and remain there for the purpose only of cleaning, preparation of meals, necessary repairs, or other work in connection therewith. If the Council does NOT want to allow sale of alcohol until 2 a.m., this portion of the City code will have to be amended. FYI: The City of Spring Park has the actual hours stated in their code (until 1 a.m.) so their situation is in reverse, being they would have to take Council action TO CHANGE the close time to 2 a.m. They have indicated that they currently have no intention to make this change, therefore 1:00 a.m. closing time remains. printed on recycled paper -2749- JUL~9?'200~ 21:07 FROW-ORONO PD + T-360 P.O15/OZ9 F-046 Orono, Medina,. Corcoran an.d Mound Pollce..De_nartments Minnesota Safe and Sober Campaign 2004 The Orono Police Department is preparing a joint '~Safe and Sober" traffic enforcement effort with the Mound, Coreoran and Medina Police Departments and wishes to apply for funding for the Year 2004 Campaign. This funding willbe used to supplement our regular patrol compliments in an effort tn accomplish the goals and objectives of this Campaign. This will include reading the number of alcohol related traffic accidents, increase the use of seatbelt and safety equipmen~ by all persons, and increase the number of juvenile/alcohol related incidents involving motor vehicle operation. 1. Project Director's Strengths: The project director for the proposed 2004 Safe and Sober project is Orono Police Chief Smphany Oood. Stephany is highly committed to the success of the project. Her greatest sldll is bringing people together and building a dedicated and cohesive team. Stephany has extensive experience in managing law enforcement work groups and has managed budgets, equipment and scheduling. She bas her master's degree in public safety administration and education. Traffic safety, crash reduction and the orderly flow of traffic are major concerns in the areaproposed to be covered in this grant. Stephany has met with members of the community, the school district and civic groups concerned about traffic safer/as well as all of the law enforcement partners involved in the project. The communities served by the proposed grant are 100% supportive of the project. Stephany will be working closely with the Proj eot Coordinator, Sgt. Correy Farniok, who is an expert in waffic enforcement, laws, u'affic related law enforcement technology and is a highly respected team player. We are confident that we have highly motivated people in the right places and can make the most effective use of our resources. We lcuow our cormnunity will be grateful for our efforts. On July 30 and 3 I, 2003, Officer David McNichols will attend a course to become a child safco/seat installer. He will become certified as a practitioner which means that he will be able to conduct inspections and installations of child safety seats. To keep his certification, Officer McNichols wiU need to participate in twelve installation/inspections annually. Many communities have regular days when residents eon come by for this service. These dates will be listed on the web site, and Officer McNichols will participate in them as part of his duties. Officer McNichols will aisc coordinate inspections within Orono. Possible partnerships would include E.C.F.E. events where parents of babies and young children are present. It is a]so feasible to contact the many large daycare centers fl~at we have in our cities to have them offer inspections on a given evening at a time the parents usually pick up their children. All of our cities generate newsleuers in which we will announce the inspeetion/ins~llation service dates. Officer MeNichols may also be able to offer these services on a eaU-for-appointment basis. If this program is JUL.O?-ZO0~ Zl:OT FROW-ORONO PD + 'r-B60 P.o16/Dz8 F-046 Safe and Sober Campaign successful, Orono will consider a £our-day technician training course which would olTer unlimited flexibility of our program. 2. Our Communities: The City of Orono has a popuJation of approximately 8,000 residents. Jn addition to serving these residents, the Orono Po[icc Department provides police coverage to the cities of Long Lake, Spring Park and Minnetouka Beach bringing the total coverage to approximately 12,000 community members. The City of Medina has a population of approximately 4,000 residents and provides coutract coverage for the C~ty of Loretto with an additional population of 570. The City of Medina is located on the northern border of Orono. The City of Corcoran, population 5,000, borders Medina on the north. The City of Mound, which is located on Orono's southern border, has a population of approx/mately 9,500. Ail four communities are located in the west-central portion of Hermepin County. There are over a dozen heavily-traveled routes, along with many srnaller roadways, wh/ch communities north, west and southwest utilize for daily commutes to the inner rings of the metropolitan area. These mutes include U.S. Hwy. 12, State Hwy. 55, County Roads 6, 10, 15, 19, 24, 30, 50, 51,101, 115, 116, 117, 151 and County Road 44. State Hwy. 55 alone sees an estimated 40,000 motor vehicles daily(a,m, and p.m. rush hours) on this two-lane highway. It is estimated that more than 50,000 commuters use U.S. Hwy. 12 on a daily basis. Overall, it is estimated that more than 110,000 vehicles travel on Medina and Orono roadways each day alone. Our communities are home to several large corporations and/or industries each with 200 plus employees participating in shift work during the average work week. We also incorporate several private schools as well as thc Orono school district which includes an elementary, middle and high school, and the Westonka school district located on Mound's northern border. Several county park facilities are located within or near our boundaries including Baker, Crow-Hassen and Rebecca Park Reserves and Noereuberg Memorial Gardens. Nearly 700,000 annual visitors can be expected in these areas. Orono provides recreational access to Lake M/nnetonka and also Long Lake which brings land and water enthusiasts to the area. Mound also provides access to Lake Minnetonka along with several charter services that are located in this city. Special activities also draw motor vehicle traffic well beyond the nonua] volumes indicated. Some of these events include the Hamel l~.odeo, concert circuit at the Medina Ballroom, Hennepin County Fair, motoeross competitions, 4-H events, the Big Island Blues Festival, Long Lake Corn Days. Mound City Days, Mound Fish Fry and the Mound Tree Lighting Ceremony in December. Orono Police Department Page -2- JUL-,D?-ZO0~ ZI:OT FROM-ORONO PD + T-$60 P.OI?/OZ9 F-§46 Safe and Sober Campaign 3. Previous Traffic Law Enforcement Ef~forts: The Orono Police Department~ along with the Medina Police Department, has worked successfully with other agencies in the area to form a multi-agency traffic sat~uration group. We call this group, The Chief's Challenge. The group consists of seven local police deparunents that combine their efforts on a predetermined day to a specific area in each city. The Orono Police Department has used this effort to conduct traffic saturations targeting DWI arrests. In one ef-fo~ on a 4-hour shift, the group netted fourteen DWI an'ests within t]~e Orono area. The Chief's Challenge group also has had great success wi~h traffic enforcement designed to reduce crashes by enforced saturation details such as enforcing seat belt usage and traffic citations. Overall, the group has written more than 1000 citations yearly for the past 2-1/2 years during which this program has been in use. Safe and Sober grant financing would enable us to enlarge our program; however, in the event that we fail to receive funding, we plan to continue with our present efforts due to the overwhelming success ortho project. On multiple occasions, the Orono Police DeparUnent, along with Medina and Corcoran, has also participated in the OperationNightcap Program sponsored by the State Patrol. Ail departments have also participated in the Seatbelt and DWI mobilization coming up in July. 4. Our Resources and Media: Each Police Department will involve and enlist the cooperation from several print mediums, one from a local source, as well as two beyond our respective borders. A h~gh percentage of enforcement stems from residents "passing through" our cities, living in places as far away as 70 miles. It is our intention to tap into the local newspapers in these far away communities and r~ke our efforts known. The Police Departments will continue their strong community relations with the numerous corporations and housing communities we serve, maintaining parmersbips in the education and implementation of safety in our neighborhoods. P~epresentatives from these areas will assist us in conducting ~raffic/seatbelt surveys as well. It should be noted that Orono participates in Alcohol Awareness and Server Training annually for local licensed beverage establishments. Servers arc made aware of their responsibilities and are trained in identification laws and ordinances to prevent over serving and to aid in age verification. The Orono Police Department also conducts informal information seminars with schools and service organizations on the subject of controlled drinldng demonstrations. We also conduct anmual compliance checks for all on and off-sale businesses inthis jurisdiction in conjunction with other local police departments. All departments have police reserve and community service officers who will provide assistance during enforcement efforts. Reserves will be able to provide transportation, conduct staweys and create enforcement visibility during enforcement and non enforcement periods. Community service Orono Police Department Page -3- JUL~O?-ZO03 Zl:0? FROk'I-ORONO PD + T-360 P. 018/029 F-046 Safe and Sober Campaign officers will assist wi~h seatbelt surveys, community outreach programs and similar event participation. The following activities are planned for the 2004 Safe and Sober campaign: News release to a min/raum of three print mediums of pre-enforcement and post-enforcement expectations for each wave or,he campaign, as outlined in the Program Plmaer. Public Service announcements on local radio stations. Officers will be available for ride-a-long opporrtmities by local media personnel and will be available for interviews. Traffic safety brochures will be handed out to each violator with the current statistics on crash date, speed, safety belt and alcohol related incidents. Continue participation ha the Hermepin County Traffic Advisory Committee. Alcohol involved crashed vehicles will be displayed at middle and high school facilities during prom and graduation dates. Officers will distribute informational brochures to The public at various community events such as the Hamel Rodeo, 4~h of July observations, Cabin Social, Buckhorn Days, Big Island Blues Festival, etc. Officers will utilize local volunteer £n'e units, scouts, housing development groups, motorcycle associations and church communities to conduc~ our sea, belt survey, thus creating opportuni~ for participation by the public in our project. 5. Our Campaign Plan: The Orono Police Department along with other agencies involved in this program will be working five-hours sh/_hs. The time of day will vary from depamnent to department based on lfigh ~raffic volumes and also on concem~ of the citizens and various incidents. Each department will look at the rush hour traffic in their individual city along with their special events in the late evening hours for DWI saturation. Orono Police Department Page -4- JUg~O?-eOO3 Zl:0? FROM-ORONO PD + 2004 Safe & Sober Grant Application Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety Application for the Following Xg~ncy(ies): Orono Police Department, Medina Police Department, Mound Police Department, Coreoran Police Department LEAD A.G, .ENCY INFORMATION e-nt~l address: sgood~ci.orono, mn.us Omno Police Department Chief Stephany Good Proi~t Die. toT ~ CT,yped Rank & Name) 2730 Kelley Parkway Pro. ioct Director's Sip,refute ?,O, Box Sffeer Address {needed in addition to ?,O. ,B. ox) ,,, Telephone 952/249-4700 City Oroao, MN Zip $5356 Fax 952/476-3028 Lead or single agency applicants must ~l in one of the following numbers. Ask your auditor or rreasarer or city clerk. A~si~tant Financial Director Rca Olson Fiscal Officer; (Typed name & job Federal Employer ID Number: ~41-6008585 Or Mkmesora Tax ID Number: .. Fiscal Officer Resolution Stores: [] Attached [] In Progress ~ (Date: .,, ) Ch~ck the following mobilizations for which you submirmd a report: [] November 2002, [] December 2002, [] May 2003, Please make every effort to complete the e-mail address box, A home e-mail address of the project director is tiao if one available at work. Providing an e-mail addres~ will help OT$ cormntmicate with you quickly and will be appreciated. Complete the reverse side if more than one agency is involved. Copy the reverse side if needed for more ageacies, 1 The person responsible for over-all management of the entire project (i.e., scheduling, media, summarizing reports and invoices for OTS). 2 The person respons~le for verifying ~a,~cial records for thc project (cannot be the same as the project director). 3 If in progress, give date scheduled or estimated for eormiderafion by board or council. JLIL~O?-ZO03 21:08 FROM-ORONO PD + T-360 P.O20/O21a F-D48 Auac]m~nt 3 LEAD AGENCY INFORMATION e-mall address', cfarnlok~eLorono, mn.us Sgt. Correy Parniok Orono Police DepArtment A, gency Contact! (Typed Rank & Name) 2730 Kelley Parkway Agency Contact's Signature ._ P.O. Box Street Address (needed in addition to P.O. Box) Teleph, 01m 9S2/249-4700 _C. ity Orono MN Zip 55356 Fax 9S2/476-3028 Resolution Srzms: [] Ar~ached [] ~ Progress 2 (Dar~: ) Check :he following mobilizations for which you subrakted ~, report: [] November 2002, [] December 2002, [] May 2003. PARTNER AGENCY INFORMATION c-mail address: cbellm~d~ci.m~jq~.mn.u~ Medina Police Department Chief Edgar J, Belland A~ency Contact~ (Typed Rank & Nm~e) 20S2 County Road 24 Agency ,Conutct's Sisnatur~ P.O. Box Street Address (needed in addition to P.O. Box) Teluphone 763/473-9209 City Medina MiN Zip ~S340 Fax 763/473-6939 Resolution S~atus: [] Attached [] Iu ?regress ~ (Daze: ) Check fl~e £ollow4.ug mobilizations for which you subnormal a report: [] November 2002, [] Deco-tabor 2002, [] May 2003. PARTNER AGENCY INFO~ATION c-mail address: m.~ssm,~n~cLmOUT~d.mn.~ Mound Police Department Mike Sussman, Patrol Officer _ , A~ency Contact~ (Typ~ Rank & Name) 5341 Maywood Road A~c¥ Convacl's Signalur= P.O, Box Srr=~t Address (needed in addition to P.O, Box) T¢l~h. one 952/472-0632 Cily Mound MN Zip 55364 Fax 9~2/472-0656 Resolution Stat~: C1. A=a=hed [] Ia Progress ~ (Dare: ) Check t. he following mobilizations t'or which you submlt~ed a report: [] November 2002, [] D~¢~mber 2002, [] May 2003. The person in each partner agency respons~Ie for such things as scheduling and reporting :o Icad.agency projec~ director, If in pzog~ess, give da:e scheduled or estimated for consideration by board or council. JUL-O?-ZOOa Z1:08 FROM-ORONO PD + T-360 P.OZ1/O2g PARTNER AG~.NCY ]~q'~O~TION c-mail address: pschutteci, corcoran, mn. us Corcoran Poli~ Dep~ment Paul S~u~e, Chid [ A~cy Con.ct~ (~ Ra~k ~ 8200 Coun~ Ro~d ] 16 A~ Comet's S~ Add.ss (n~ ~n a~fi~n m P.O. Box) T~l~h~ 763/4~0-8966 ~k ~h~ follo~ mob~a~om ~or which you sub~d a ~o~: ~ Nov~b~r 2002~ ~ Dec~mb~ 2002~ ~ ~ay 200~. PARTNER AGENCY iNFORMATION " e-ma~l address: AgcncyName Agcncy Contact~ (~od R~k & Name) . . ~cn~ Con~'s S[~mm P.O. Box ... St~t Address (needed in ~difion m P.O. Box) Tcl~hnne ciw Zip ~solufion Stores: ~ A~ached ~ ~ Pro~ess ~ ~are: ) Check ~e follow~g mob~fions for which you s~d a repom ~ November 2002, ~ December 2002, ~ May 2003. A~c~ Contact's Si~atur~ P.O. Box S~eet Address (n~ded in ~dition to P.O. ~ox) Tol~hono Ci~ Zip R,soludon Sm~s: ~ Anached ~ ~eck ~e follo~ng mob0izadons for w~c[ you subbed a r~om ~ Novemb~ 2002, ~ Dec~ber 2002, ~ May 2003. 1 The person responsible for ~e project over-aU at the parmer agency (i.e., scheduling, media, reporting to OTS). 2 The person responsible for partner agency's financial records for the project (cannot be the same as thc proj=ct director), 3 I. fin l:rrogress, give estimated or scheduled date for consideration by board or council. JUL~O?-ZOD3 21:08 F:ROId"ORONO PD + T-360 P .OZ2/OZ9 F-046 2004 SAFE & SOBER PROJECT PROPOSED BUDGET Lead Applicant Agency: ,Orono Police Department See P,~P pages 4, 5 and 6 for a discussion ofb_ud_getin~;. Proposed Federal Budget (only federal grant monies in this block) J · . Fedwcal Safe & Sober Budge: Sunm~ary Category 1. Overtime Enforcement I-louts Budget 2. Discretionary Budget Federal Budget Total FederaJ .~naou_nt $29,600.00 $0 $29,600.00 Percent (Federal amount div/ded federal budget total) 100% 0% 100% mil No~:: Fcdcrally paid overtime-enforeem~ hours must equal at least 85% of The total federal budget. On all the following budget forms, "Federal share" refers to the amount of money you ~e seek~g in Safe Sober grant funds and "Agency share" refers to fl~e cost commitment by your agency or private sources to whi you .have access. The column "Total cost" refers to the sum of the federal share and the _agency ~b~e. Part I:OVERTIME* ENFORCEMENT HOURS Overtime . Number of Federal Agency 'Group* rate/hour** Fringe*** hOurs Total cost · abate share Orono (Patrol) $ 39.10 ..... $ 4.60 240 $10,600.00 10,500.00 0 Medina (Patrol) $ 37.81 $ 4.60 180 $ 8.500.00 $ 8,500.00 0 Mound ('Patrol) '" $ 37;/1 $ 4.60 150 $ 6~00.00 $ 6~00,00 0 Corcoran (Patrol) $ 38.65 $ 4,60 100 $ 4,300.00 $ 4,300.00 0 Total owrfime $ 26,600.00 $ 29,600.00 $ 0 *Rank or seniorfiy - groupings of officers with similar salaries. ** All dollar amounts to be rOunded and estimated. Attach further explanation ~fnot overtime hours. ***Fringe rate on overtime hours is usually 13% or less. See page 5 of RFP for more on an acceptable fringe rate. PART 2: DISCRETIONARY BUDGET SummaiT , of Discretionary Budget PUrPose .... F. ederal Share Agency Share Total Cost .... Administration .... $ 9,800'.00 " $ 9,800.00 Equipment 0 0 Operating" $ 4,500.00 $ 4,~00.00 Travel $ 300.00 $ 300.00 Incentives 0 0 $ $ 4, o0.oo $ 4,6o0.00 * Details'required on reverse side. See ~ pages 4, 5, and 6 for a discussion of budgeting. 2004 Mix.sots Safe & Sober JUL=O?-200$ 21:08 FROM-ORONO PD + T-350 P.OH/OH F-045 At'rachmem 3 Breakdown of Discretionary Budget fcc RFP 4, mi t for diicm io Posifior~'ii. e., supervisory, Total per # of Federal A§~zy dispatch, clerical, public iafo). ' ,H_o_ _ur~ly~te F.rinfe hour lmun Total.c?.t_ share ,h~-e Admln. Assistant (Aug. $ 20.00 $ 4.60 $ 24.60 I05 $ 2,583.00 0 2583.0 Ail) Police Chiefs (Aug. All) $ 3f.00... $ 4.60 $ 39.60 tiff ... $ 2~$74.00 O 2574.0 City Clerks (Aug. All) $ 28.00 $ 4.60 $ 32.60 14 $ 456.00 0 456.0 Pro,iect Coordinator .~. 2,0.00 $ 4.60 $ 24.60 25 fl; 615.00 O 615.0 SFST/Adv/Opeu 25,00 $4 60 29.60 14 414 0 414 CSP T_raining 22.00 $4.60 29.60 1.20 3192 3192 Total $ 9800.00 $ 0 $9800. . Equipmeat * ... Description' ~m Cost' per ~i[. Tor~ cost Fedml s~e s~ro* * Note: Agency share for each piece of equipment must bc greater r. han or equal to Federal share :' ": Description _; Nun~or af [miles I C°stp~'Imile To~, ,,c,o~t Squad operating rate per mile* 12,500 I .36 4500.00 * stare rare of $0.36 per mile can be used if agency doesn't compute ~eir own rate. Federal share A~en,7 sh 4500.00 Trav~' ' a~:t Subsistence " Number Name and Location of C0nf~rem:e Azt~ndin~ , Total Cost* Fe~ral. sh~re A~nc7 sh Safe and Sober 2003 Conference St Cloud 8 $ 300.00 0 $ 300.00 Total $ 300.00 $ 0 $ 300.00 See RFP pages 4, 5, and 6 for a dismassion of budgeting. 2004 Minaesota Safe & Saber JUL*0?-Z00~ 21=08 FRO~OROHO PD + T-350 P.024/ozg F-046 A. ttachmcm 3 ' ' 'gAFF. & SOBER2004 BASIC AGKF.,EM ENT L~ad Agency Name Crone Police Department Partner A~crmyO¢$) Name(s) Medina Police Department, ~Iound Police Department, Corcoran Police Department 31,000 Total Population Served by A~ency(ies) ....... Name of cit~ or,county used for seat belt & alcohol rates): Full-Tir~: Oron0 42 _ _ Parr-TLmtz: 2 Number of Officer~ ia Agra~ies) (See gridw ,~/laaItment ]) Aleohol-related Crashes By VMT: [] higher rhea state average or [] lower than state average By Population: _[] higher ~an state average o~[] lower fl~a_n s~a~ average (See gri&v ,~uachmenr 1) Non-use of Seat Belts in Crashes IBy VMT: [] higher than sta~e average or [] lower titan state average By Population: [] l~_~r than sta~ awra~c or [] low~ than state ave:a~e Applicaat in one of 20 coundes with the highest number of deafl~s and serious injuries? (see grids: Attachment 1) [] Yes [] No I Considering the number of additional enforcement hours you plan to schedule, Jill in at OBJ-'~CT][VES least three of the blank object, ives (#$ 2 through 12). See the second paragraph of page 12 of the RFP.for more information and instructions on objective. 1. Realizing Safe & Sober is a grant dedicated re reducing deaths and injuries caused by ~gfic crashes by increasing seat belt and child seat use and decreasing impaired driving, the agency commits to enhanced enforcement and public and media relatiom cure,ach following the Safe & Sober calendar provide& 2. Strive to increase DWI arrests by _2_0percent (from 30.....~5 to .366 arrests) when comparLag those written begSnning 1/1/2002 and ending 12/31/2002 to those written beginning 1/1/2004 and ending 12/3/2004. 3. Sudve to increase seat belt use, as shown by informal surveys, from 82 percent to $9 conducted the w~ek of May 26, 2003 to those conducted the week of May 26,2004. percant whcncomparingthose 4. Strive to increase child seat citations wrimm by 200 . percent (from 3 to 6 written/n the period from 1/1/2003 to 12/31/2003 with those from 1/1/2004 to 12/31/2004. __ citations) when comparing those 5. [] Conduct or X participate in 4 child sear clinics during the year beginning Oct. 2003 and ending Sem. 2004 6. Strive to increase seat belt citatiom/warnings wri~n by _ $0 p~rcent (15om 215 to 322 citations) when comparing those written in the pm-lcd fi:om 1/1/2002 to 12131/2002 wi~ those from 1/1/04 to 12/31/04. 7, S~rive to increase speeding citations written by 25 percent (from 1748 to 2185 from 111102 to 1 Z/31/02 with those from 1/1/04 to ) when comparing those written 12/31104 2004 Safe & Sober Basic Agreement, page 21:08 FRO~-ORONO PD + Strive to increase "not a drop" drinking and driving arrests by. 40 perccat (from those written from 1/II2002 to 12/31/2002 wifll those from 1/1/04 T-360 24 to to P.OZS/OZg F-048 33 ) when comparing 12/31/04 10. Strive :o increase minor consumption arrests by 30 from 1/1/02 ~o 12/31/0Z with those from percent (from Sl~ to 66 .) when comparing ~ose writzen 1/1/04 to 12/31/04 Track and report disposition of [] DWI an'esu. for the ~ period beginning and ending [] Ail arrests.. [] All cita'dous and arrests 11. Reduce The number of ~raffic-related complaints by percent (from ~ received from to with those received from [0 complaints) when comparing those tO 12. Reduce the number o£pcoplc injured in traffic crashes by 20 percent (fi.om 96 to 78 injuries) when comparing those injured from 1/1/2002 to 12131/2002 with those injured fi.om 1/1/04 :o 12/31/04 EI~ORCEME. NT You must complete this emire section, lf ttll Safe & Sober-funded hours are within S&_g waY, windows, put a 0 in 4 and NA in5 . See RFP pages 5 (£nforc~em Hours] and 6 (Hours by Wave). The mm] estimated number ,fSaf~_.& $ob~rpatrol hours re be worked durin[ the year is 640. · Thc estimated number'of additional pa~'ol hours during each of the three regular length Safe & Sober enforcement waves will be 450. 2) 3) The estimated number of additional patrol hours during all of the six Safe & Sober enforcement m~,~;-waves will bc 190. 4) The total number of paTrol hours esrirnated to be outside of r3ae Safe & Sober enforcement windows will be 5) Outside window hours divided by Total hours..(~ / #1) eqUals n/a %~. PUBLIC INFO~TION AND MEDIA This section is o brief survey of the number of media outlets available to RELATIONS you. Fill in The number of each type in the boxes rhar apply; leave blank only if there are none itl your area. I1 1 6 1 Weekly Newspapers Daily Newspapers SFhool Newspaper~ Radio Stations 0 1 0 3 Commercial TV Stations Cable TV Stations Company Ncwslet-~rs City/Organizational NewsletTers You arc required to dism'bute news releases to all media ouders (including to The editors or staff counselors ofkigh school and coll~ge papers) and to conduct other public in/oraTion and media relations a~tivitics. Sec pages 7 and g oft'he RJ~P. ITRA.~, ING Fill tn two numbers at the end of the line on the first 4 lines. -for example, ,3 (10) (/three q/fleers need and ten o, ffleer~ have had the course. For first ~ear grants, ~ldvanced 2004 Safe & Sober Basic Agreemont, page 2 of 4 JUI.~0?-Z003 21:06 FR0~0RONO PD + T-360 P. 0ZG/OZ9 F-046 Attachme',,, 3 gFgT ia' not requi d and' either firs nor second y ar gra ts are required ro have a CPS prac oner: ~ut NA in the space ~thar ~afning ~ n~t required OTS will send details of the September wor~ho~ at a[ater da~e. A~ndance is requlrad ~ one person porn each lead agency. People~om a~onc~es are ~lcome bur nor required ~o a~r~d. Se ~P ~age ~ ~ for coafere~ce co{r i~[o~ation. !) The ~b~ of offices w~ w~ aeed {or hay, had) S~~d F~!~ Sobfi,~ T~s~5 is : ( 4/22 2) ~o n~er of officm who g~ ~ed (or have ~d) Occupmt ~otecfion Usage and Enforccmm~ ~: (9/17 .). 3) ~e amber of officc~ w~. will need (or have had) Advmced SFST is ' ( 7/19 ). ..4) ~borofa~mcy~taffwho~llneedtobecnm,(or~e) c~edChildPa~eag~Safo~pr~fi~oners ( 1/1 ). S) ~e ~b~r ofag~n;y s~ffwho ~ ceded ~!d P~seng~ Safe~ Technicians: (no~ req~ed) Nm~(s) of CPS Pra~fi~nc~ m~or Tec~ci~s):' 6) ~e people who will a~end the Saf~ & Sober come,nee on Fri~y, Septmbcr 5u~ are: Name ~en~ Phone Number Sgt. Co~ey Fa~iok arena Poli~ Deponent 952/2494700 Officer Mike Suss~n Mound Police Depar~ent Un~own Name .~edina Police Deponent I 7631473-9209 Unk, C0reoran Police Department 763/42fl~966 Officer Chris F~cher arena Police Department 9~2~49-4700 R~PORTING You musr fill in # 4. (See Section page 7 ortho RFP for survey informational 1) A plan on a form provided by the OTS will be submitted by October l~t, 2003 for the Ocmberfest. Halloween, and Thanl~giviug waves; by January 1~r, 2004 for The Super Bowl, Valentines, and ST. Patrick~ waves; by May I4a', 2004 for the gradua~ort and July waves; and by two weeks prior to the County Fair for The County Fair and September waves and when nor covered by thc above, prior to the use of m~y owrtime hou~s outside of the Saf~ & Sober enforc~nent waves. Basic information on enforcement schedules and public md media relations effm-I~ are ino!uded in the 2) 3) A progress report on a form provided by the OTS will be submit'ted by December 15La 2063 covering the Octoberfest, Halloween, and Thanksgiving waves; by March 31", 2004 covering the Super Bowl, Valeat/xtes, and Sr~ Pawicks waves: by August 6th, 2004 covering the graduation and July waves; and by September 25th, 2004 covering the County Fair and September waves. Progress repo~ will include informmon on citations and warnings £or specffio offenses as well as public infonmtion and media relations activities conducted. A report on the number of impaired drivers arrested during r. he December mobilization will be submitted by noon January 2004. A report on the amber of seat belt citafiom whiten and of infonv, al belt surveys resultS for the May mobilization wiI1 be submitted by noun June lOto, 2004. A..final report on progress towards objectives, problem% a,d successes will bc submi~ed no Iatcr ~h_a,_ October 3 I, 2003. A set of informal seat belt uae surveys will be condu¢red during NoVemb. er 4 -- 17, December 2,8, May 10 - 23, and lune 7 -- 1_3_. ^ set is d~fined as counts of shoulder belt use and non-use of drivers and front scat passenger conducted aT ,. 1 8 sites. Site locations shall remain constant throughout the year. Results will be submitted re OTS in l~DortS, 2004 Safe & Sober Basic Agreement, page 3 of 4 JUL~0?-ZD03 Zl:08 FROM-0RONO PD + T-360 P.0Z?/0Zg F-046 A~3:~nt 3 Imvoiccs will be submit-~d no less frequently fh.n he following schedule: 3anuary l"~ (for Octoberfe~t. Halloween and Thanksgiving), by May 1st (for Super Bowl, Yal~ntines and St. Pauicks), by August 1'~ (for graduariorx), and blt November 14'h (for July, Counv/Fairs, aad .~c'Ptember).; The OTS is required m reimburse grant costs according ~o s~a~e fiscal years, therefore, you must separate out all cosla iacurmd before luly 1" fxora all costs incurred after tha~ date. T,,no invoices covvriag diffexent slate fiscal yaar~ can b~ submitted sol, ether. ]~'QUI~. M~NT . Fill in the boxes Wi~h numbers, Leave blank ~f the answer is none. You are not required to have every piece of equfipment. Squad Cars Radar Units Laser speed units Di.~iml PBTs Pass/Warn/Fail PaTs 3 11 4 19 Speed display trailers /n-squad-video lntoxil.vzer$ Mobile dar'a/.displ,~¥ tcrmina]s SPECIALIZED PERSONNEL Drag Reco~/.tion Expo'~s: Fill in both of the following; leave blank if the answer is none. This is for our ] information onl~ - ?ou are nor required to have these personnel on staff. inmxilyzcx Operators: 31 2004 Safe & Sober Basic Agr=cme~, page 4 of 4 REPORT ON' SEAT BELT AND CHILD SEAT CITATIONS AND WAR.NJNGS DURING PREVIOUS SA.FE & SOBER YEARS There is no easier, cheaper, more effective way to save lives and provera injuries than to increase scat belt and child seat use rates. When evaluating applicatlon.e for £afe & ~ober 2004, the OTS will again consider your performance in comparison *o other grantees for thc rate of vehicle stops per hour, the rate of stops that resulted in a citation or written warning for violation of the seat belt or child seat laws, and the rate of stops resulting in a citation rather than a wamlng. This report is mean: to help you to make your case that your agency does need a Safe & Sober grant and is conmxitted to exfforcirg the passenger pro:ecrdon laws. Please note: "Everyone is buckled up" only tells us yoar agency doesn't need a Safe & Sober grant as badly as all those other places where everyone isn't buckled up. Each year OTS is able to approve about half of the requests far funding - it is our responsfbility to do evcxTth.ing we can to ensttre our grants go to those commumtics who need them most and can use them best. For each past year in which you received an overtime patrol Safe & Sober grant, fill in the percemage of Contacts whleh resuke~ in an action for failing to comply with the seat belt 'or child seat law. The results by lead agency for 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2005 are attached 2003 only includes the wa~e data ax of June 5. For more current. 2003 data, call your OTS coordinator). In evaluating how well your agency has done, we will consider significant improvement and the answers to the quesMons,,,,as well as ab.eohtte percentages. ' Year Your Contacts All Agencies Average Contacts Related to Passenger Protection Related to Passenger Protection 1996 % 20,09% 1997 % 19.0% 1998 % 18.4% 1999 % 20.7% 2000 19 % 203% 200I 17 % 21.5% 2002 20 % 213% 2003 date 23.8% Lfyou believe your agency did its part to enforce ~e passenger protection laws but your me was adversely affected by the poor performance of a partner agency, report your agency's results in conu'ast to your partner agency's (or agencies) results below: As a "partner agency", we have been unable to accurately document our efforts. As a "lead agency", it is clear that our statistics are steadily improving. Seatbelt survey have indicated an increase in usage, thus enforcement contacts Imve been slightly lower. Example: Orono in (3) areas indicate average usage at 8%89%, One area is at approximately 90-92% per seat belt surveys. Restraint Use Enforcement Repoxt for 2004 Safe & Sober Page 1 of 2 JUL%O?-ZO03 21:09 F~O~ORONO PD + T-$$0 P.O2~/OZ~ F-046 If the report on.the opposite side indica~ you did not meet the average seat belt or child seat ra~s of other agencies, tell us what you will cio diffet~y in 2003: At our departmental kick-off, we wJi] emphasize the need for additional seat belt enforcement. We will also dedieate more shit, s during daytime hours to b~ip hcilitate thc enforcement and education of scat bdt u~ $inc~ scat belt enforcement is a secondary offense., these hours will better meet our goals and objectives. Medina Police Department has utilized unmanned patrol ears at various locations to reduce tra~c ~omplaints~ Bain scatbelt complhnce and lower vehicle speeds. - Orono Police Department has used Reserves and Community Service Officers to conduct scatbelt surveys and to help promote and gain seat belt compliance. Is there anything eL~ would you like ~e OTS :o consider regarding your agencies ability to increase seat belt use and euforcement in your area? This year, because of the four cities involved serving a population of over 30,000 people, we will be conducting seatbeit surveys in at least (18) areas. R is our hope to give a clear indication as to the percentage of people using seat belts and to which areas will need specific attention. Those areas that show a need for more attention will have increased enforcement and educalion in hopes of bringing seatbelt compliance to that area. P~s~'atnt Use Enforcement Report for 2003 S~rfe & Sober Page 3 of 2 h A r T E R E D 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9310 fax http://www, kennedy-graven.com June 24, 2003 ROBERT J. LINDALL Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9219 Real Propen~y Law Specialist, Certified by Minnesota State Bar Assn. Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Changes to Eminent Domain Statutes with Respect to ACquisitions for Public Projects Dear Kandis: The Minnesota legislature enacted some changes that will impact acquisition costs on all projects, and will impact timing on road and transportation projects. As part of the transportation funding bill, which was adopted as Chapter 19 of the 2003 Special Session, the legislature increased the appraisal fee reimbursement amount from $500 to $1,500. This change will impact all negotiated purchases and eminent domain acquisitions. It was effective June 9, 2003. The legislature also enacted a new section in the eminent domain statute, to be codified at Minn. Stat. 117.036. It applies to acquisitions for public highways, streets, roads, alleys, airports, mass transit facilities and other transportation facilities or purposes. Before commencing any eminent domain .action for such a transportation project, the acquiring authority must: (1) obtain an appraisal, (2) the appraiser must confer with.the owner, if reasonab!y possible, and (3)at least 20 days before filing an eminent domain petition, a copy of the appraisal must be provided to the owner and the owner must be told of his/her right to obtain their own appraisal. The owner is entitled to reimbursement of appraisal fees up to $1,500 within 30 days after the owner submits the information necessary for reimbursement, provided that the owner submits the information within 60 days after the owner receives the government's appraisal report. In addition, before commencing eminent domain, the acquiring authority must make a good faith attempt to negotiate personally with the owner to acquire by direct purchase. This section is also effective June 9, 2003. Lastly, the legislature amended section 13.44 subdivision 3 of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act to provide that an appraisal report is public once it is provided to an owner as required in new section 117.036. RJL-233487vl MU200-92 -2750- Kandis Hanson Ltr June 23, 2003 Page 2 If you have any questions about this matter, please give me a call. Robert J. Lindall RJL:peb cc: John Cameron John Dean RJL-233487vl MU200-92 -2751 - The Gillespie Gazette VOL XI NO7 July. PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE June 17, 2003 Dear Members and Friends, Our beautiful sprfng has continued into the month of June. We usually get Plenty of rain in June (notwithstanding "April showers, May flowers"). Although things are quite green, we could use a nice gentle rain soon. I certainly had more golf games rained out last year than I have had this year. Please remember to get a Sweepstakes ticket before July 4~. This is a fund raiser that those of us who buy tickets don't have to do any work. Wells Fargo Bank sponsors this sweepstakes, which helps support our Center. You have 56 chances to win, so please get a ticket at the reception desk if you don't yet have a ticket. We have two other fund raising events coming up soon. On Friday, June 27~, we have our Pork Chop Dinner, with servings at 5:00 pm and 7:00 pm. The Westonka Whirlers Square Dance Club will perform at both so this should be a fun evening. Also, On Saturday, July 12~, we have an old-fashioned Saturday being put together by a great committee led by Dee and Ken Scott. There is a flyer in this newsletter about the full day of activity beginning in the morning with a craft show and breakfast and finishing up at night with a supper, entertainment featuring Roger Erickson from WCCO, singing and fiddling by Cai Brazier, plus old-time dancing and some simple square dancing. Hope to see you all there. We have all heard about budget cuts being made by the State of Minnesota. Because of these cuts, our Senior Dining Program is in jeopardy. The Senior Dining Program provides a nutritious meal for seniors who, otherwise, might not geta nutritious meal. In order to keep this program going for the coming year, we will need to come ,p with about $10,000. We certainly hope we will not lose this important program at our Center. We are open to ideas or suggestions ifyou have them. You may turn them in at the Reception Desk. I was on vacation, Omaha, recently, for a family reunion. Many of our members either have or will take summer vacations. Since we are "older and wiser", I hope we are all buckled up and enjoy our vacations. Chairperson Gillespie Center Advisory Council -2752- -2753- ""¢~¢ ~ ~' DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, May 28, 2003 TOnka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Orv Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Pete Nelson, Victoria {ardved at 7:20 p.m.); Tom Seuntjens, Uinnetonka Beach; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Katy Van Hercke, Uinnetonka. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative technician. Members absent: Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Lili McMillan, Orono; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Herb Suerth, Woodland, CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster · The annual Board Lake Inspection Tour is scheduled for Wednesday, 6/18/03, from around 6 p.m. to later in the evening. Further details are being worked on by staff and will be forwarded in the near future. · The Crystal Pierz Marine Lake Cleanup Day is scheduled for 6/21/03. Staff has distribution kits promoting the event to be forwarded to local city halls and other locations and he encouraged Board members to pick up these kits after the meeting. · The City of Victoria has appointed a new Board member to the District, Mr. Pete Nelson. He was scheduled to attend the meeting and will be sworn in when he arrives. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance on subjects not on the agenda.' There were no comments from the public on subjects not on the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Skramstad moved, Burma seCOnded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved included: lA, 2003 Multiple dock Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of 2003 renewal, without change, multiple dock license application for Jennings Cove DOA, and 3B,. April financial summary and balance sheet. WATER STRUCTURES B. Wayzata Marine, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length and side setback variance application. Foster asked for background on this agenda item from staff. Nybeck stated that draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the dock length and side setback variance have been prepared consistent with Board discussion, with one possible exception. The second condition in the Order requires the applicant to submit to the District an as-built survey of the site and -2754- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May 28, 2003 Page 2 dock facilities no later than one year from the date of approval of the Order. He stated that this was not part of the motion at the 5/14t03 Regular Board Meeting that directed LeFevere to prepare these Findings and he wanted to bring this to the attention of the Board. The Board discussed this condition and the general consensus was that it should be included in the Findings because the existing drawing was not to-scale. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the Wayzata Marine dock length and side variance application as submitted, maintaining the condition that requires Wayzata Uadne to submit to the District an as-built, survey of the dock and facilities within one year from the date of approval of the Order. VOTE: Motion carded 'unanimously. C. Gideons Point HOA, new multiple dock license and vadance applications for 47 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 2,398" of shoreline. The proposed variance application is to amend a previously approved vadance at Lots 1-5. Foster stated that there was a public hearing conducted, with significant discussion, at the 5/14/03 Regular Board Meeting. A !ett~r is, included in the handout folders from Board member Babcock that summarized his concem.s,.with.the proposed applications because he was unable to attend this meeting. Additionally. staff was dire¢{ed tO prepare a detailed spreadSheet of what is proposed,versgs whathas b~en ap.,pi~ved..~He .belieVed that. the deve opment has beaUtiiui homes in it howeyer, the developer poorly planned it when easements were not granted for the non-abutters throughout ~e deve!opment. Th!s,has resulted, in the densest aspects, of, docking for the development to be.Jocated on e~ch end of the property that ~va~' dedicated forthe 'muliipled%k licehse. He stated ~'athe w,Oqld.be troubled, wilth the Board making changes of docks at each end ~3f {he site; however, he. ~°uld not b~"troUbled with the Board making minor change~jntemally. He asked Harper for an ~.verview of the.sp[eadsheet prepared by staff. Van Heroke asked staff to comment. On whether feedback had been received from the City of Tonka Bay prior to reviewing the spreadsheet prepared by staff, NYbeck stated that he re~iv~, feedback from the Mr. Dave Cole, President of Gideonspoint HOA, and the Ci,ty of'Tonka, Bay ~,a~ng the pi'°~s~d app!ications:.;,.The fbed'beCk re~ivecl from both parties was that the Cityof Tonka Baymadeit abundantly clear that ~ey did not Want an, y changes appr, p,,.ved at oUtiot A. 'That is a n0n-is~ue at'ihis p~)int be~;ause the. aPpliCant has not proposed a~y changesto Outlot A at this time. The City of Tonka Bay was not overly concemed about changes to docks placed from Lots 1-12 in the development. However, Tonka Bay has a different Code requirement that .requires a 10' side setback within all 13 lots. This differs from the District Code that_ requires minirfi~.m,, ,~ide setbacks from the outer side site lines of the shoreline dedicated to the multiple dock faci!ity. He qUestk)ned,whether the Board should get involved in the enforcement of the Tonka Bay Code that requires internal side setbacks for all 13 lots. Foster stated that the City of Victoda had recently appointed a new Board member to the District. He welcomed Pete,Nelson on behelf °fti~e Board and asked LeFevere to administer the oath of office. LeFevere administered the oath of office of office to pete Nelson. He was seated as representative for the City of Victoria. -2755- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May28, 2003 page 3 Harper stated that four BSU's are approved and proposed at Lots 1 and 2, with both docks 160' in length. The approved site plan has BSU sizes of 11' x 24', 14' x 32', 14' x 32', and 11' x 24'. The proposed site would have BSUsizes of 12' x 24', 15' x 32', 15' x 32', and 11' x 24'. The approved dock has other features of a 60' :side setback from the westem extended §ide site line extenSiOn, a limit of two same dark colored canopies, and the need for shielded lighting. Different features proposed include a 41' side setback from the westem extended side site line and added structure around BSU #1 to make the tie-on a three-side slip. Seuntjens questioned whether the 60' Side setbaCk on the approved site plan is measured to the edge of the dock, not including the beam width of the boat stored in BSU #1, or if it requires a 60' side setback to the west edge of the boat being stored in BSU #1. Nybeck stated that the 60' side setback from the western extended side site line isto the outside of the boat being stored in BSU #1. Foster Stated that he had concern about the PropOSed site plan to reduce the setback from the westem extended side site line from 60' to 41' and to add dock structure around BSU #1 to make it a three-sided slip rather than a tie-on. He suggested using dolphin poles as an alternative to added dock structure at BSU #1. Canning stated that he recalled the abutting site to the west of Lot 1 was a city owned street end and not a house. FOster stated that there isa house on other side of the sti'eet that looks dOWn right upon this dock structure. Canning stated that he had heard testimony from Other Board members that this resident to the west had concerns with side setbackS at Lot 1. No testimony has been received on the applications that are currently proposed and he did not see compelling evidence to require a 60' side setbaCk from the western extended side site line rather than the 41' that was proposed. The Board discussed whether the western extended side site extension would change With the recognition that the'shoreline on the west-side of the lagoon at Lot 1 was not continUoUs. The consensus of the Board was that it would not be different from what was apprOved in 1993. LeFevere stated that it appeared that it would ~be difficult for the applicant, based on the approved and proposed site plans, to maintain 10' side setbacks from the internal 'site. lines at the deVelopment for each lot. Mr. Greg Vennes, 25 Gideons Point Road, questioned why the 41' side setback to the west of BSU #1, plus the width of Pearl Street to the west, was not adequate to protect the concerns raised by the neighbor in 1993 to the west of Lot 1. LeFevere pointed out that the Board has adopted a Code provision since 1993 that requires docking for two or more residences in a development that requires a mu t p e dock license to be located in the center of the facility to reduce the impact on abutting properties that are not part of the development. -2756- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May 28, 2003 Page 4 Harper stated that two BSU's are approved and proposed at Lot 3, with both docks 140' in length. The approved site plan has BSU sizes of 11' x 24' and 14' x 32'. The proposed site plan would have BSU sizes of 10'x 20' and 13' x 30'. The approved site plan includes a double wide slip structure with both watercraft stored within it. The proposed site plan would include a single wide slip structure with the second BSU to be stored on the west side, with an 11' "L" dock structure on the west side. Foster asked the applicant if the property owner at Lot 4 had given Lot 3 access through their property to access the proposed dock. Mr. David Cole, 80 Gideons Point Road, stated that'the proposed site plan would need to add structure over the lagoon area for Lot 3, similar to the approved site plan. Harper stated that two BSU's are approved and proposed at Lot 4, with both docks 128' in length. The approved site plan has BSU sizes of 14' x 32' and 11' x 24'. The proposed site plan would have BSU sizes of 10' x 20' and 14' x 40'. The approved site plan includes a double wide structure with both watercraft being stored within it. The proposed site plan would include a single wide slip structure with the second BSU to be stored on the west side, with an eight-foot "L" dock structure on the west side. Nybeck pointed out to the Board that it was difficult for staff to determine in some BSU's what the proposed length would be. For example at BSU #8, the length of the slip on one side is 32' and the other side is 47'. The Board might want to consider placing boat length restrictions in these locations if it is a concem. LeFevere stated that Gideons Point HOA generally conforms to Code, with the exception of the variances granted for Lots 1-5 and Outlot A. Therefore, square footage calculations from the approved site plan to the proposed site plan do not necessarily need to be considered by the Board. Harper continued his overview of the spreadsheet: · At Lot 5, three BSU's are approved and proposed at the 128' long dock. The approved site plan has BSU sizes of 11' x 24', 11' x 32', and 14' x 32'. The proposed site plan would have BSU sizes of 10' x 20', 10' x 20', and 15' x 32'. The three watercraft stored at the approved site plan are contained within single-wide and double wide slip structures. The watercraft at the proposed site plan would be stored within a single-wide slip structure and two tie-ons on the west side. A 16' "L" dock structure is proposed on the west side. · At Lots 6-12, it was difficult to evaluate the approved site plan because the covenants for the development stated that all seven lots could each have up to four watercraft; however, not all of them at the same time because this would exceed the number of BSU's approved for the development. Because of this, a number of the BSU's for Lots 6-12 are not documented on the approved site plan. · At Lot 6, one BSU is documented on the approved site plan and three BSU's are proposed at the 100' long dock. The approved site plan has one BSU documented at a 14' x 32' three-side slip, with no other BSU's documented. The proposed site plan would have BSU sizes of 16' x 48', 10' x 20', and 14' x48'. One difference between the approved and proposed site plans would be that the proposed site plan would have a 16' ,L" dock structure on the west side. · At Lot 7, one BSU is documented on the approved 100' long dock and three BSU's are proposed on the 94' long dock. The approved site plan has one BSU documented at a 12' x 24' three-sided slip, with no other BSU's documented. The proposed site plan would have BSU sizes of 12' x 40', 12' x 32', and 10' x 20'. The proposed site plan would have two watercraft being stored within two -2757- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting MAY28, 2003 page 5 three-side slips and the third watercraft being stored as a tie-on on the east side. One difference between the approved and proPoSed plans would be that the proposed site plan would have a 16' 'L" on the west side. At Lot 8, one BSU is documented on the approved site plan and three BSU's are documented on the ProPosed site plan, bOth 100' long dockS. The approved site plan has one B~U documented at a 14' x 32' three-sided slip, With no other BSU's documented. The proposedsite plan would have BSU sizes of 10' x 20', 12' x 32', and 16' x 48'. The Proposed site Plan would have one watercraft being stored within a three-sided slip and the remaining two watercraft being stored at tie-on locations, one on eaCh side. One difference between the approved and proposed plans would be that the proposed site plan would have a 16' "L" on the west side. At Lot 9, One BSU is documented at the approved 100' long dock and three BSU's are documented at the proposed 45' long dOck. The approved site plan has a one BSU dOcumented at a t2' x 24' three-sided slip. The proposed site plan would' have BSU siZes of 10' x 20', 12' x 32', 10' x 20', and 16' x 48'. All four watercraft to be stored at the proposed dock Would be at tie- on locations.. :Two differences between the approved and prb~SSed site Plans W°u d be that the proposed site plan Would have a eight foot "L" on the west side and there'Would be substantial dOck StrUcture removed. Nybeck stated that the four watercraft to be stored at the proposed site plan for Lot 9 took into conSideration What was inStalled in 2002. If four watercraft Were to be stOred at Lot 9 inthe future, he questioned whether the proposed plan woUld be adequate and that it would probably require the applicant to secure a new license from the Board. Harper continued his overview of the spreadsheet: · At Lot 10, one BSU is documented at the approved 100' long dock and, four BSU's are documented at the Propo~bd 81' ion§ d~k.' ~e approved si.te Plan hZ§ 'One ~"~U d°CUmented at a 14'X 32' three sided :slip. 'The p~osed si(~?la~:wOuld haVe BSU ¢!Z.e,s 0f14, x,¢O~, 10'x 20', 12' X 32', and 16' x 4'8'. One Of the W atercraftio be' stored at the. '~0~d Site Pla~.wOuld be within a three,sided SiiP and three w%ldbe st%8'at risen 10Ca(i~n~i '0% d. iff~ren(~e between the approved and proposed site plans would be that the.proposed site plan. would have an eight-foot "L" on :the west Side. . At Lot 11, two BSU's are documented at the approVed 100' long dock and four BSU's are documented .at th'e prOpoSed.~!' i°ng d0~k, Ti~ aP~:~ved siie plan ihaS BS~ :sizes 0f:!~2' x 24' and ~4' x 32' documented withid three.side~ slips. Th8 pr°posed site p an'~°u d have BSU sizes of 12X 40", i6'x 50', 10' x20'' and: 10, ~':20. The p~op~: sit~,Pian ~Ould have twO Watercraff being stored within three-sided slips and two at tie-on locations. One d fference: betweeB the approved :and'proposed si~epian~'w°~ld bb that =ihat' proP°seal st~ Plan': woui~'.:~ave a '~, "L" on tho':east side. :: '':' ' ~ · At LOt 1'2, one aSU is documented at the aPProved 100' long dock and three are proposed at the 97' long dock.' The approved site p an has one BSU documented at a 14' x 40' three s ded slip The proPbse~~ ~ite pi'~ ~0Uid i~ave BS'U:'Sizes 0f' i4; x ~'i 10i X 20' and 14~ x 40;,' One of the watei'ctaff w0uid be stored Wiihih: a th:iee:Si'ded slip and the remaining tW°would ~)e ;t tie-on Ioca~idn§. one diffefe'nce between the apprOved and propOsed s te plans would be that. the proposed site plan would have an eight-foot "L" on the east side. · · No changes have been proposed to Outlot A from the approved site plan. Foster stated that he' was not troubled by the proposed changes, with the possible exception that added structure at Lot 1 would impact the abutting neighbor to the west. He suggested that a dolphin pole might -2758- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May 28, 2003 Page 6 be a better a!temative and that he supported a 60' side setback to the dolphin pole from the westem e. xtegde~_d~..sid-~e~.sjt_~ Jige atLot !, which...would..be, more appropdate..than.the 41'...that-has been proposed to the edge Of the dock. Seuntjens stated that if the applicant agrees to comPly with the 60' side setback requirement at Lot 1, what differen~ woUld it make whether it was to the dock strUcture or a dolphin pole provided that the boat was not being stored within the setback area. The Beard diScussed the.proPosed site plan at Lot 1 and what changes would.need to be made to comply with the 60' side setback requirement from the extended side site line. There .was .discussion on the request from the City of Tonka that each individual dock meet a 10' side. setback from each internal side site extension for a11'13 !OtS; The consensus of the Board was that.this would not be practical because a number of the docks on the approved site plan already do not comply with that requirement. MoTioN': seuntjehs mowedl Skramstad seconded.to direct the Distr ct attomey te prepare Findings of Fact and Ordei~ for appro~/al of the Gideons Point HOA 2003 new multiple dock license and variance appli~ation~~, suJSject to amending the proposed site to maintain a 60' side setback from the western extended side site line at BSU #1 for both dock structure and boat storage. FOster proposed a fde~d'!~ amendment to the moti°n that BSU's 1 and 4 be tie,ons rather than three- sided slips, With the condition that they can use dolphin, poies for the dock structure removed Seuntjens and Skramstad stated that they were more concerned with the 60' side setback requirement rather than whether there was dock structure at BSU's 1 and 4, . ...~ · Bu~a stated ~a~ he was troubled with th~ pi~oPOsed variance.application. In 1993,. the applicant agreed to th'~ cUrreriii~ ~proved':siie~:~i:~n; ~owev. er, t~Y ihStall'~ a~'?dOc~ thais, is not, ConSiStent with this site plan The' ProP°sed'¥~Ha~ce' a~Piic~O~ w~~io~''~e ~a~ to '~Pprove whai has b~n installed ilegally for a num~e.r' of ye~.::~':~e.~.~:' i~:U~:le with ~'e' aPPii~'ani'.~eq Uesting, BOard approval affei:.the fact Van HerCke stated that'she unde~tood the comments of Burma; however, she believed that dec sions made by current Boards should not restdct decisions made by future Boards, There was a significant amduni'Sf work d°neib 1993 to re'~c~ ~'.:CU~ei~t co~r,(~:mi~e;hOwever, the City of Tonka Bay does not appeai~t° be`'. OppOsed .to C~ange~'~i: Lois 1-12'' Sh~"~ia(~d i~at":~e E~a'id h~d: n~)t receiVed negative f~back fr°'m'the abUttihg :ne!~h~b!; to .the west of.' ~{ 1'.'~ ~ the CUrrent aPpliCation:s proPosed Bd~a stated'that variances ~rn C~d~ require particUlar ha!;dships and he belie~ that they were addre~sed"an~!' resoiv~ in 19§~ by ~ Board. No additiOnai" parti:cular hardshiPSlhave been presented by the applicant that he believed requires additional variances from. Code are, necessary. SeUntje~ns siated that he suppbrted approving what.has be~,n in~taiied, ratbe~ ~an requiring the apP icant to install What wa~ approved in'19931 ~ecaa~e it C%ld b~ .liilg'ai~d'ir~ ~u~ and h~ wo~,!d not support that. He recommendedI that it is the'resP°nSibi!i~ of stafl'to ih~ct'annulaliy to'enSure thai {he docks nstalled ate consistent with the approVed site Plan(~)'. Nybeck clarified that the p~oposed applications ate before the BOard'because staff observed during recent annual inspections that the docks installed were not consistent with the approved site plans. -2759- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May 28, 2003 Page7 Foster stated that LeFevere has pointed out that the applicant conforms to Code, other than variances have been previously approved for Lots 1-§ and Outlot A. In reviewing of the proPOSed applications, he believed that the Board should focus on.the dock length variance request the request.for number of BSU's, and concerns of the abutting neighbors. No significant changes have been proposed to the approved dock length variances and no changes have been proposed to the number of RSU's. He believed that the concerns of the neighbor§ wOuld be addressed by maintaining the 60" side setback to the west. However, the Association has been in cdminal violation over the years for not complying with the approved Vadance Orders and multiple dock license requirements. He Suggested that the Board consider the proposed applications for what they have proposed, not what they currently have or do not have. He recommended a friendly amendment to the motion that diScUssion and requirements from the 1993 Vadance Order should be forwarded to the draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the proposed applications by LeFevere to be prepared by LeFevere, including canOpy and lighting restrictions. Seuntjens and Skramstad agreed to this. VOTE~ AyeS (8), Nayes (1, Burma); motion Carded, as amended. Foster directed the apPlicant to submit a revised site plan to be attached to the Findings that would reflect the changes made to it at this meeting. D. Additional Busine'ss, There was nO additional busineSS. EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE A. 2003 EWM Harvesting~ason, staff overview of proiect. Foster asked for background on this agenda item from Nybeck. NYbebk stated that he believed the staff overvieW of this projeci:was generally seif-explanat0ry, Staffing and independent' contractOrs for maintenance and t~uckihg have aiready been flnaj,~d The ~udget has been finalized for 2003; however, there might be some unanticipated expenses re'la~ing to the used High- Spe~ Trari~Port Barge that will be used in conjunction with thePrOgram in:2003, He stated that he would keep the Board informed on this, The new equipment will ardVe from Aquarius systems in the next week and the existing Distdct harvesters will als0 be launched in the next week. The Board discussed the request'from Libbs Lake residents to COndUCt private harvesting in the bay, if merited: There was discuS~i'0n on whether th'iS.Would set Precedent on a akewide baSiS and What impacts it WoUld ~ave0n an already tight budgeL ' The ~OfisensaS of the Board 'was foi sia~ to further check into this and report back to the Board, if necessary, B. Minutes from the 5/9/03 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. Foster stated that Staff had informed him that these minuteS had not been finalized and that they would be for the 6/il/0.3: Regular Board Meeting. C. Additional Business. There was no additiOnal business. -2760- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May 28, 2003 Page 8 3. FINANCIAL A,_Au_dit of v_oUchprs. (~L!6/03 - 5/31./03) ............................................................................ Ski'amStad reVie'~d the audit of v~uchers as submitted. MOTON: Skramstad moved, Burma seconded to approved the audit of vOuchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously C. Review of draft 2004 LMCD Budget. Foster asked for an overview of this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that the draft 2004 LMCD Budget was recently prepared with the assistance of Foster, Babcock, and Burma. He provided an overview of the draft 2004 LMCD Budget, with emphasis on the boat density and user attitude surveys planned. He reviewed planned revenues and expenses budgeted for these surveys, including the MN DNR and annual funds from the member cities for Management Plan projects as the two primary funding soumes. $17,000 was received from the member cities in 2002 and an additional $5,000 will be received in 2003 from the member cities for these surveys, noting that an additional $5,500 was budgeted in 2004 for Management Plan projects. A meeting has been planned in the District office at 12 NOON on Friday, 6/11/03, to gather comments or feedback from the member cities prior final review by the Board at the 6/25/03 Regular Meeting, He encouraged .comments or feedback from the Board prior to submitting it to the member cities for their review. Foster stated that these surveys are conducted every fou~; yearn, with 2000 being, thelast year,they were conducted. Budgeting for these surveys is done annually, rather than for the calendar year that they are planned, at the request of a number.of the member cities. Canning state¢ that. District collects a significant amount of revenues and fees annually forJicenses and permits isSUed. He questioned.whether Lake Minnetonka citizens do not seek proper licenses or permits from the District, such as variances, When. the member cities that they reside in already provide funding for the District. He eXpressed concem that the appliCants are charged back for administrative and legal costs for applications submitted.. Foster stated that the District cannot charge fees for applications licenses and permits beyond what it costs the District to actually process and administer these applications. He be!ieved that there has been a str~ng effort by the Distdct to ensure that it complies with this state law, ad. ding that he believed this was consistent with the majority of the member cities for their licenses and permits issued Canning stated that he believed that the costs are a big factor in a number of cases why the residents on the lake do not seek licenses and permits from the District. Nybeck stated that the Distdct has $115,000 budgeted,in revenues for licenses and .permits in 2004, of which' approximately $5,000 would be received for vadance requests. The majodty of these revenues will be received from renewal applications for multiple dock facilities, charter boats, and liquor licenses for these charter boats. He reviewed the existing policy established by the Board for vadance applications, noting that there is a $250 base fee and a $250 deposit fee that could be totally, partially, or not refunded based on the amount of legal and administrative time spent in the .review of the application. He believed -2761 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting MaY 28, 2003 page 9 that this question is a policy decision of the Board; however, the existing policy to charge reasonable expenses back to the applicant is quite COmmon at member cities around the lake LeFevere concurred that this is a policy decision of the Board and that a number of cities are getting more aggressive in charging back reasonable expenses to the applicant due to' the current economic situations. Foster stated that he believed the existing policy was reasonable; however, he recognized that there is a need to have fees Iow enough to encourage individual residents to submitthe proper applications for consideration by the Boar& The policy of the DiStrict to have residents pay a reasonable amount of expenses for a license or permit request to the Board is not uncommon. Canning stated that he was concerned about the District actively seeking residents that do not comply with Code requirements. Foster stated that Code violations at private residences are handled by staff on a public inquiry or complaint basis. Staff is more proactive with licensed facilities~ such as multiple dock, where annual inspections are conducted. LeFevere stated that it would be difficult for staff to actively enforce possible Code violations because it would not apparent in most case where the side site lines are located and whether there was consent between neighbors to waive side setback requirements. Skramstad stated that the DistriCt is seeking full funding' of the Water Patrol Project in 2004; however, this will probably be difficUlt for Hennepin County with their economic COncems. He suggested that the Board should consider altemative funding sources for this project in 2004. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Burma seconded to accept the first draft of the 2004 LMCD Budget and to forward it to the 14 member cities for their review and comments. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously D. Additional Business. There was no additional business, LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Goldwave Cruises, Inc., staff recommends Board approval of refund for withdraWn Char[er Boat Registration, Wine, and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications as outlined in the 5/14/03 staff memo. Foster asked for background on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that Goldwave Cruises, Inc. submitted Charter Boat Registration, Wine, and Non- Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications for the 2003 season, They have communicated to the District that they would not be in business in 2003 and they have requested refund of any unused fees. Fees submitted include a $150 base fee for Charter Boat Registration application (refundable), $200 for both the Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License application (non-refundable), and $500 for the preliminary investigation conducted for Wine and Nomlntoxicating MaltLiquor License'appli~ations (refundable). He recommended that the Board award a refund of $650 to Goldwave Cruises, Inc. -2762- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May 28, 2003 Page 10 Canning ques. tbned why_the. Board_would not.refund.the_additional:$400...for the-Wine and-Non. intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications. Nybeck stated that he was making the recommendation based on current fee resolutions for these applications. The consensus of the Board was that the Board should consider reviewing the existing fee resolution rather than granting, individual exceptions to the existing fee resolution that states fees are non- refundable. MOTION: Van Hercke moved, Skramstad seconded to refund $650 to Goldwave Cruises, Inc. for their withdrawn Charter Boat Registration application ($150) and the preliminary investigation fee for the new Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications. VOTE.= Ayes (8), Nayes (1, Canning); motion carried. B. 2003 Liquor Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of renewal Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications for the charter boats, Banana Winds and Fantasia. Foster entertained comments or a motion from the Board on this agenda item. MOTION: Ambrose moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the 2003 Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications for the charter boats, Banana Winds and Fantasia. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously C. Additional Business. Canning stated that there were some changes at the recently adjoumed legislative session that could have impact on liquor licenses issued to charter boats on Lake Uinnetonka. He believed that there might be a need for policy discussions ~elating to potential changes at an upcoming Board meeting. Possible changes could relate to change of the hour of closing from 1 a.m. to 2 a.m., firearms, the possibility of licensing authorities increasing the number of'Intoxicating Liquor Licenses that can be issued without receiving approval from the state legislature, and changes to existing joint civil liability. 5. ADMINSITRATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVE THE LAKE There was no discussion 7. EXECUTIVE. DIRECTOR Nybeck commented on the following: The lake level as of 5/23/03 was 929,77', with a discharge of 175 c.f.s, -2763- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting May 28, 2003 Page11 There was a copy of the most recent quarterly Executive Director Newsletter in the handoutfolders that was sent out to the member cities and each Mayor around the lake, A request has been made from a City of Excelsior council member regarding the storage of afire rescue boat at the new docks installed near the Excelsior Commons. If the Board had an interest in amending the Code to allow this request, he provided a copy of current Code Section that allows for longer docks for law enforcement purposes at publicly owned docks and another Code Section that does not count these watercraft for density purposes. The Board discussed this request and believed that a Code amendment would make sense for fire rescue purposes. There was also discussion on whether it would make sense to include other public watercraft in a Code amendment. The consensus of the Board was for LeFevere to prepare a Code amendment for the storage of certain public watercraft on Lake Minnetonka for the 6/11/03 Regular Board Meeting 8. OLD BUSINESS Update on Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee Van Heroke asked for an update on when the next sub. committee meeting was scheduled. Foster stated that he had not been able to follow-up on the last sub-committee meeting and schedule the next sub-committee meeting. Howards Point Marina Seuntjens asked for an update Howards Point Marina Nybeck stated that discussion of the "off-lake" storage question at Howards Point Marina is scheduled for the 6125103 Regular Board Meeting. .Update on Minnetonka Beach Dockinq Issue Seuntjens stated that the Board approved a new multiple dock license application for Minnetonka Beach this past spdng. Concerns were raised at dock site 23 and whether the proposed site plan should comply with the 30' minimum side setback required to the west or whether it was grandfathered from this setback requirement because the approved site plan was not to-scale. He met with Nybeck at the site and both of them agreed that the approved site plan was erroneous based on stakes at the dock site. The Board has requested an as-built survey of the dock sites in this area from Minnetonka Beach by the end of the season. He stated that he did not believe an as-built survey was needed because it would be an improper use of public funds. Nybeck stated that he concurred Seuntjens that the problem at dock site 23 was the approved site plan and not the dock encroaching into a non-conforming side setback area. The 2003 multiple dock license was sent out with the condition that Minnetonka Beach provide an as-built survey by the end of the boating season. If the Board desired to remove this condition, there should be a motion made and passed by the Board. MOTION: Seunjtens moved, Skramstad seconded to withdraw the condition on the 2003 City of Minnetonka Beach multiple dock license that requires an as-built survey by the end of the boating season for dock site 23. -2764- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting M~y~28, 2003 VOTE: MOtiOn carde~_un~im~s_!y~.- 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 10. ADJOURBNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjoumed at 9:20 p.m. Page 12 Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -2765- DRAFT LAKE M!NHETONKA CON~ERYATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, wednesday~': 3une ii, 2003' .... Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Paul Knudsen, Uinnetrista; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Tom Seuntjens, Uinnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Katy Van Hercke, Uinnetonka. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Lili McUillan, Orono. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster Foster announced that the annual Board Lake InspeCtion Tour was scheduled for Wednesday, 6/18/03. He asked for further details from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that further details had not been finalized; however, they would be in the next few days, These details will be forwarded to all Board members once they have been finalized. READING OF MINUTES. 5i14/03 LMCD Regu ar Board Meeting 5128103 LMCD Regular Board' Meeting Foster stated that staff had informed him that the draft minutes for the 5/28/03 Regular Board Meeting had not been finalized and that they wOuld be in the packet for the 6/25/03 Regular Board Meeting. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Skramstad seconded to approved the minutes from the 5/14/03 Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS. persons in attendanCe on subjects not on the agenda. There were no comments from the public on subjects not on the agenda, 1. WATER STRUCTUrEs A. G~deons P~int HOA, consideration 0f'draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of new mutliple dock license, and d'bck length vadance apPl cations. FOster'introduced the agenda item and eniertained comments or feedback on the 'draft Findings. Nybeck stated mat the President for Gideons Point HOA, Mr. David Cole, had contacted him regarding -2766- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District RegUlaY~'t~oard Meeting June 11, 2003 Page 2 the draft Findings and the only comme.n[C0ie had was' whether language should added to them that addresses Outlot A. He questioned whe~er therewas aneed to address this in the draft Findings. The Board discussed this and conclUded' "that the Findings could be amended to reference two approved site plans, one for Lots 1-12 and one for Outlot A. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the Gideons Point HOA new multiple dock licenSe and dock length variance applications, subject to adding language that references two attachments for approved site plans (Lots 1-12 and Outlot A). VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance Amendment, first reading of an ordinance relating to the storage of watercraft owned by public agencies, amending LMCD Code Sections 2.01, subd. 2 and 2.02, subd. 6. Foster entertained comments or feedback on the draft ordinance amendment. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Craig Nelson seconded to approve first reading of the ordinance amendment as submitted, to waive second and third readings, and adopt it. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C, Additional BusineSs. Suerth stated that the Code restriction that limits watercraft length to a measurement of length overall at Groveland HOA was causing them and oiher faCilities around the.lake problems. He indicated that he would like to discuss this at this meeting. Foste~ recognized the request from Suerth and stated that it would take place under"New Business" later in this meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS · Lisa Ryskamp, vadance application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements at 1080 Wildhurst Trail on Forest Lake. Foster opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m. and asked for background from staff. Nybeck made the following comments: · Ms. Lisa Ryskamp, 1080 WildhUrSt Trail, has submitted permanent (non-multiPle)dock license and variance applications to construct a 119' long permanent dock for the storage of twowatercrafton Forest Lake in the City of Orono. The p.rop~sed variance application ha~ b~en submiffed fo[ variance froM:c°de for dOck'length requirements, Wi~ a ptiysic,a! i'iai~dship' 0f Shail0w waier, me aPR cant contacted the office a few months ago and inquit'ed 0n'the pOsSibility of reconstructing a permanent dock that had been there.for s~yeral years, probably s.[nce the 1970'S. Based. oB an on-,site i'ns~ti0~, ~e c0ncib~l~~ [hat t~ prOpose~ appii~ation~ were needed to be COnsidered by the Board. · Code Section 2,06 states, that "no..person may !~.c,~te,.construct, install, or. mai~taip, a new permanent dbCE~&n::~e Lak~ wi~0ut ~t'seCuring a permit t~e'fefor frOm the EXecutiVe D~reCtor pursuant to this -2767- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 page3 section". The Executive Director may grant the permit if tl~e information shows that the dock will be in compliance with Code. There is a grandfather clause in the Code that allows permanent docks lawfullyin existence tocontinue"without-ap-ermit:~Both~the~existing md proposed ~'aiieiitdbcks are not contained within the authorized dock use area for this site. · Code Section 2.01 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for docking and storage of watercraft. The authorized dock use area is further defined by maximum ,dock length and side setback requirementS. The existing permanent dock does not comply with maximum length and minimum side setback reqUirements for this site. The proposed permanent dock would not comply with maximum' length requirements; hoWever, it would comPly with minimum side setback requirements. · Code SeCtion 1.07 alloWS the Board to permit a vadance from COde, with conditions deemed necessary, where praCtical difficulties or particular hardships occur. In reVieW of the proposed application, the Board should ensure that the practical difficulties or particular hardships are caused by the application of the Code. To ensure this, the Board ShOUld apply the following decision standards in the review of variance applications. TheSe decision Standards inClude:' 1) Is theProposed use reasonable, 2) Would it be unreasonable to require conformance to the ordinance, 3) Is the difficulty of conforming to th'e Ordinance due to circumStanCes unique to the propertY, 4) Is the problem one Created by the applicant, and 5) Will the variance, if granted, alter thb essential character of the locality. He stated that he believed the proposed permanent dock length of 119', with two watercraft to be stored at it, was reasonable. The Code allows for dock length vadance beyond the. 100' long authorized dock use area to reach water depthS of~,' at the outer edge of the dock. The applicant has docUmented awater depth of three feet at 100' from the 929.4' shoreline and foUr feet at 119'. He questioned whether the Board would like to restrict the number and size of watercraft at this permanent dock. · In compliance With'MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, theMN DNR andthe City of OrOno were provided a.copy~of the proposed applicatiOns on 5/29/03, With commentS due on6/9/03. No feedback has been received from either agency; however, he believed that thepermanent dock would require a conditional use permit from the City of Orono. · He:stated that staff could not take action on the ~proposed permanent'(non-~ultiple) license application until the Board makes a decision on the proposed variance application, ~He believed th'at a particular hardship of shallow water exists for a dock.length variance'and the Board could direct the District attomey to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the variance application, with any conditions deemed ~necessary, · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Seuntjens asked for the definition of a permanent dock on Lake Minnetonka,' Foster stated that a permanent dock is defined as adoCk that is pile driven and cannot be removed frOm the lake with hand tools. There are docks on the lake that are installed 12 months a year and considered seasonal because they can be removed with hand tools. "' ' Seuntjens questioned whether the channel leading into Forest Lake would have enough clearance for a 35' long boat. Foster suggested that this question should be addressed to the applicant. Skramstad stated that he would like cladfication from the applicant on whether the proposed dock woUld be pile driven. -2768- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page 4 Pete Nelson asked for clarification if there was a definition in the Code for Iow-water cimumstances and whether the proposed variance application and permanent dock would be a long-term solution for the applicant. Foster stated that the process established for dock length variance requests takes into consideration a four foot water depth at the edge of the dock from the 929.4' contour, or 925.4'. The variance process does not take into consideration the fluctuating water depths within a season and from season to season. Nybeck clar fled f(~r the Board that four watercraft have been proposed to be. stored at the permanent dock rather than two. These would include a 34' long boat, a 19.5' boat, and two personal watercraft. Skramstad questioned whether the ~Board should take action on the proposed application prior to the City of Orono taking action on a conditional use permit application, if necessary. Foster stated that he believed both the District and the City of Orono could review applications at the same time. He believed that it would not be fair to the applicant to require an approval from the City of Orono prior to the Board reviewing the proposed applications. Ms. Lisa Ryskamp, '1080 Wildhurst Trail, .made the following comments: · She.and her husband have approximately 103' of continuous 929,4' lakeshore frontage. · The existing permanent dock currently has a 13.5' side setback from the extended side site line to the south and the proposed permanent dock would meet 20' side setbacks from the both abutting property owners. This will require the existing permanent dock:to bemovedslightly to the north. · The,existing dock. is pile driven and the proposed dock would also be pile driven.... · A35' Iongboatshould be. able to navigate through the channel leading into ForestLake because there are others on the bay. · She stated that she was aware of the conditional use permit process With the City of OrOno and that she was working with,city staff on secudng this permit~ · She entertained further questions or comments from the Board. Van Hercke asked if the four watercraft to be stored at the proposed permanent dock would be owned and registered to her and her husband, Ryskamp stated that they would be. There ~being no further comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 7:31 p.m. MOTION: Van Hercke moved, Knudsen seconded to direct the Distdct attomey to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the Lisa Ryskamp permanent (non-multiple) dock and dock length variance applications. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Foster pointed out to the applicant that deicing of the proposed permanent dock would require an annual permit from the District. -2769- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page5 Hary Kr'eslins, new multiple dock license application for eight-Boat Storage Units (BSU's)on407' of shoreline on St. Albans Bay. Foster opened the pub c headng at 7:35p,m. and. provided background on the proposed application. There has been a request by the applicant to continue the public headng to 6/25/03 Regular Meeting because they have issues to resolve with the City of Greenwood and because Miles Canning was unable to attend this meeting. He did not want staff to review the proposed application at this time; however, he entertained comments from the members of the.public who were in attendance. Ms. Nancy Kelm,: Greenwood City Administrator, stated that she was unclear on the location of the extra dock at the applicants property, if approved. Nybeck stated he believed that the applicant proposes no new docks; however, two additional BSU's have been proposed from the approved number of BSU's six. Kelm stated that the City of Greenwood has two issues that.the applicant needs to resolve. First, Greenwood has a contract with the applicant that restricts the number of watercraft at this.site. Second, there is a setback that needs to be maintained from a firelane at this facility. Nybeck stated that the City of Greenwood has concerns about a covenant agreement they have with the applicant and the accuracy of the survey submitted by the applicant. He questi0.ned whether the Board should consider denying the proposed appl cat on to enforce a covenant agreement the City of Greenwood has with the applicant. There are possible, survey questions that might need to be clarified by the applicant that could reduce the amount of 9~9~.4~ i~'kesh0r~ fi~ntage ';;t .this sitel Mr. Biff ROSe, 5,'190 Meade~/ll.le Street,,, stated that the existingliagility siteplan has, approximately 320' of lakeSh0re frontage and the aP~!icant Js '¢urrentiY:p~0posing 408' of lakeshOre frb'ntage. He,questioned how the atnOunt of shOreline ncreai~ed When the're Was a recent quit claim deed that should have actually reduced the ~0r&line. He pointed ou~ that"tl~:~urv~sbbmi~ed waS ~3.1ce~fied sur~ey'.i:athe~ than a reg stered survey NYbeck stated that new multiple dock license applications r~uire a certified su~ey, not a registered survey. Information the DiStdCt .looks'for on theSe suh/eyS inclUdes i~ amOun~ of 929.4' shore ine, tl~e, location of side site iines, the PlaCement 0f the dock(b),"'and verifying'th'at it iS~ntaine~ within the auihOd~ed dock use area for:ihe siie. T~'ere Was.a q~i[ clai~'-~d ~t tranSferred sh°reline °n't~e norfh S'ide"0~iti~is slie,to the abutting proPerty to the northl This Sl~bUl~'~ deducted.from the 92914' shoreline dedicated, tg~:tl~ei cense and the C ty of Greenwood has taken the pos t oh that they have shorelin,e near the bddge that,the applicant was c aim ng. This migh:t 'al.so need 'to be: d(idU~ted fro~: the 929.4, shoreii~e dedicAied fOr the propoS~l appl :Cation Mr. Judd Mowty, 445 Lakeview Avenue, stated.that =he. had ~ce veda number of calls on the proposed application. He believed that there are a nUmber'Of issues fo'r the app icant to.resolve with the.City of Greenw°0~. He ei~couraged the Disirici to n°ti~ ti~e apPi'iCan{ in w~i~ing' t~i an addit cna 60 days is needed, in compliance with state law to process the propoSbd apP i~t°n. ' . ~" FOster stated that with no objections from the BOard, he wOUld temporarily ciose the public headng at 7:44 p.m'. and continue it to the 6/25/03 Regular Board Meeting. · Concept Landscaping, variance application fr0m LMCD Code for side setback requir, ements at 5331, 5341, and 53~1 Three Points Bird, on Harrisons Bay. -2770- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page 6 Foster opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. and asked for background from staff. Nybeck made the following comments: · Mr. Jim Smith, President of Concept Landscaping representing Minnetonka Enterprises, has submitted permanent (non-multiple) dock license and side setback variance applications to construct permanent docks at 5331, 5341, and 5351 Three Points Blvd. in a lagoon off of Harfisons Bay in the City of Mound. A particular hardship of overlapping dock use areas has been proposed for all three sites. The applicant has documented 97' of 929.4' continuous shoreline at Lot 1,97' at Lot 2, and 100' at Lot 3. 36' long permanent docks have been proposed at all three sites that would parallel the shoreline. The lagoon area where the proposed permanent docks would be located is extremely narrow with a large number of docks and watercraft located in it. · Code Section 2.06 states that "no person may locate, construct, install or maintain a permanent dock on the Lake without first securing a permit therefor from the Executive Director pursuant to this section". The Executive Director may grant this permit if the information shows that the dock will be in compliance with Code. There is a grandfather clause in the Code that allows permanent docks lawfully in existence to continue without a permit. The proposed permanent dock at all three sites are not contained within their authorized dock use areas. · Code Section 2.01 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside the authorized dock use area for docking and storage of watemraft. The authorized dock use area is further defined by maximum dock length and side setback requirements. The 36' long proposed permanent docks do not have defined slips and COde requires a minimum side setback of at least equal to the slip depth. Because of this more restrictive requirement for side opening slips, all three proposed permanent dock would not be contained within their authorized dock use areas. · Code Section 1.07 allows the Board to permit a variance from Code, with conditions deemed necessary, where practical difficulties or particular hardships occur. In review of the proposed application, the Board should ensure that the practical difficulties or particular hardships are caused by the applications of the Code. To ensure this, the Board should apply the following decision standards in the review of variance applications. These decision standards include: 1) Is the proposed use reasonable, 2) Would it be unreasonable to require conformance to the ordinance, 3) Is the difficulty of conforming to the ordinance due to circumstances unique to the property, 4) Is the problem one created by the applicant, and 5) Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the locality. He stated that he believed it would be unreasonable to require the applicant to conform to Code. In fact, what has been proposed could improve navigation in the highly congested lagoon area and other residents in the area might want to consider a similar dock design. The Board should take into consideration how variances granted for Lots 1 and 3 would impact the abutting properties that are not part of the proposed variance application. The dock and boat storage to the east of Lot 3, 1701 Baywood Lane, was granted a variance from Code in 2000 for side setbacks and an adjusted dock use area. A new couple has purchased this property and they are not currently in compliance with the 2000 Variance Order. Docking and boat storage to the west of Lot 1 appears not to be contained within its authorized dock use area and the Board might want to consider addressing it in conjunction with the proposed vadance request. · In compliance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, the MN DNR and the City of Mound were provided a copy of the proposed applications on 5129103, with comments due on 6~9~03. No feedback was received from the MN DNR; however, the City of Mound submitted three comments. These include: 1) installation of the docks must meet regulations for wetland/floodplain of the City of Mound, 2) the fee(s) associated with the City renew of application must be paid by the applicant, and 3) the City suggested that the dock application be formally submitted to the City of Mound for formal review and determination regarding consistency with City Code. -2771 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting june 11, 2003 page · He stated that staff cOuld not make a decision.on the p'topoSed pe~anent (hon:m'Uitip e) I ~ehse applic, ati0n until'the Board makes a decision on the.proposed variahce apP!ication: He bel e~ed that a particul'~r hardship of oVerlapPi,ng dock use areas eXist;' however, there are some questions'for the Board to addreS;S prior to directing the DiStrict attOrney to prepare Findings o{ Fact and Order for approval of the variance application, with conditions deemed necessary. ·These questions include: 1) Is the proposed dock configuration the best plan for the applicant and the other residents within the lagoon area, 2)'Should theBoard consider limiting, the number'and size of watercraft to be Stored at the proposed permanent docks, 3) Is a permanent dock aS proposed approPriate for the lagoon area or would it be more appropriate to require seasonal docks, and 4) What should the Board do, if anything, about the other pr°Perties in the lagoon area that have doCking and watercraft storage that does not comply with Code. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Van Hercke stated that she believed docking and boat storage in this ~pe of a lagoon area should be diSCussed' bythe Lake MinnetonkaBoat Density Sub-Committee, especially Since a number of the residents do not currently C0mply with' Code requirements. Seuntjens queStiOned who Owned the parcels of land on the south side of the lagoon where there is a significant amount of dOcks installed. Nybeck stated that he WOuld ha~e to check further into thiS On the north side of lagOon whei'e the proposed applications have been submitted, four houses were originally proposed by the Previous oWner of this land; however, the City of Mound has recently approved a subdivision of it for three houses.: Mrl Bill St°ddard, owner and developer of th:e proposed properties, provjd~ed some background for the Board. The entire north area 0f the iag°°h where he oW6~ wa~: prOperty recently SUbdivided by the city of MOund for three sites for housing purposes. He stated that he was proposing docks that parallel the shore nero look at the i6~ng,term ·benefit fOr the e~tbe lagoon area. He pr0PoS~d' peimanent d°bii~s for all three'sites to clarify the expectations of potential buyers for all three properties on what they could: expect for docking and boat storage. He Siated that he ~0uld anSWer any qi}esti6hs that Board members ~ight have Nybeck stated that an alternative to reduce side se~acks from one of the side site lines woUld be to have a clearly defined three:sided slip at each si[e. Foster stated that he was generally support ve of the proposed site plan for the permanent docks because it w(~bld minimize dbCk StruCture in:the highlY COngest~ ia~o0n area~ oh~ advantage of a Permanent dOck vemus a SeasOnal :dOck Was that the dock Would' be in. the same I°cati~: each~ ~eason onCe it hasbeen installed correctiYl ~ .: ~ Seuntjens asked if tie-on locations would be in front or behind the proposed permanent dock Stoddard said that he envisioned Watercraft would be stored in front of the dOck; hoWever, smaller Watercraft posSibiY coUld b~':'~tored behind the'pe~neni dock! He Clarified'that a numbei Of the:"d~ckS on'~ sOUth side of the lagoon originate from OUtlots th'ai were created many years ago by a developer for proPerties that do not abut the lake. skramstad asked the applicant if he envisioned a need t6 place any restrictions on boat s ZeS to be stored at the proposed permanent docks. -2772- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 page8 Stoddard stated that he would prefer that the new owners comply with the Code established by the District re!at!ng to b~at sizes. He p..roposed 36' long permanent docks at all three sites because dock sections come in 12'.increments and it should allow the residents to store a decent size watercraft at the docks, yet allow them'to have a guest tie their boat at the proposed docks. However, it is possible that this guest boat might not be tied off entirely within the 36' lOng dock. Nybeck stated that the channel leading.into the lagoon area from Harrisons Bay would probably limit the size of watercraft that coUld be stored at these docks. Seuntjens asked the applicant if the water depths in the lagoon were sufficient for docks that parallel the shoreline. Stoddard stated that there is water depth of approximately five feet out from shore 10'. LeFevere state~ that the proposed site plan was lacking some details that are ord[nari!y provided that should be defined by the applicant. These details include side site line extenSions for al!' three sites, defining the authorized dock use area for all three sites, and the setbacks from the site line extensions for all three sites. He believed that these details are essential, especially since the applicant has testified that it is possible for visiting boats to not be fully contained within the length of the proposed permanent docks. Foster concurred with LeFevere that these details are necessary on the.proposed site plan, especially since maneuvering rOom might be esSentia! in looking at the lagoon as a whole. LeFevere stated that he believed it was essential for the aPPlicant to Cleady define the area where the docks and boats stored at them would be contained within at all three sites. One outcome that the Board might not consider is. rh°i:e than One water~raft being'stored :side by side into ~e lag°on area. .~ Stoddard stated that'he wOuld be agreeable to work with staff on resolving, the issues raised by LeFeVere. Foster stated that he believed the proposal needed further work and the Board could proceed a number of ways. He suggested that' the apPlicant could work with staff on further defining the authorized dock use areas for all three of these site and bdng it back for further review atari upcoming. Regular Board Meeting, possibly as soOn as 6/25/03. He asked if there were any additional comments from the Public on the proposed.::; applications. Mr; Rick Athmann, 1701 Bayw~d'Lane, stated that he was concemed that the.proposed docks would= allow for boat storage on.the sou'th sid~ of theproposed docks. He questioned hOW far it'..was from. the com..mon side sii~'exte~ion from his pr°pe~ because it is very tight in that area. He also questioned whether canopies would be allowed at these sites. Nybeck pointed out that some of the concerns raised by Athmann are caused by their dock not being. consistent with the 2000 Variance Order. Specifically, the do.ck installed is too. long, 32', and lhere is an "L" ins!a!ied''at th'e eh~.df~ihe d0C~. extending to th~'n°rth. ~he dOck length approved in the 2000 Variance Order is 24' and the installation of a "L" was not identified on the aPProved site pian . POster stated that he spent a significant amount of time in 2000 to establish variance from Code at 1701 Baywood Lane for an adjusted dock u~e area and side setbacks. He suggested that Athmann comply with the apProved site piah~fc~r the 200'0 vaHan~ order. .... -2773- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page 9 Athmann state.that he was not:.opposed to eliminating the "L" at the end of the dock; however, he was concemedabout reducing.the.length from 32~to 24' because the dock sections are t6' in length~ This would require him to either cut one of the dock sections in half or to make an application to amend the approved variance. Foster recommended that Athmann cut one of the dock sections in half rather than to make an application to amend the variance approved in 2000. Nybeck stated that the Athmann site has approximately 25' of 929.4' lakeshore frontage. Foster stated that with no objections from the Board, he would temporarily close the public hearing at 8:24 p.m. to allow the applicant to work with staff on resolving details of the authorized dock use areas for all three sites. The public headng will be continued to a future Regular Board Meeting, possibly 6/25/03. Bayview Event Center, new multiple dock license, special density license, and variance applications on Excelsior Bay. The proposed variance application is for variance from LMCD Code for an adjusted dock use area. Foster stated that the applicant was not in attendance at this time; however, it was expected that he would be attend ng this meet ng Without objection from the Board, he recommended that the Bayview Event Center public hearing be: moved, to later in the meet ng when the applicant arrived. There were no object ons from the Board on this recommendation. EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE A. Minutes from the 5/9/03 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. The Board reviewed and accepted the minutes from the 5/9/03 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting as submitted. B. Additional Business. Suerth aSked for an u [:)date on the 2003 EWM Harvesting Program. Foster asked if the Used High Speed Transport. Barge recently purChased was operational. Nybeck stat~ that the Used Transport Barge, was operationa; however, the outboard motor needed to be tuned up. H~Pr°vJded b~a~iground On activ t, es rel~;{ing it°:the Progiam since'the 5i28/03'Regular Board Meetin[~. The ~xistin~''District harvestlng eqUiPment arid ihe equipment purChased from Aquarius System's haS'been laUnChed Ti~e two I~an/eSters itr~aded n to ~,~i~adUs Sysiems as pan oi the sea ed b d process Were. picked up the same day that the new.~uipment from Aquarius Systems arrived Lake tdals and training has °ccun:ed unde~ the suPe~iSi~)n of'H~rper, Training of the cre~ for 200~ has, taken p ace in the office and field today and will beg n ful-time in the field tomorrow in the Carmans Bay area. Ha~esii~ Will'Cont nd-~'in the Uppe~ L~a~e pri0~i. to continu ng to the LoWer Lake. Skramstad ask,ed for an update on What needed to be done and the costs involved to make the existing Distri'ct"har~esti~ eqUiPment compaib'e wth~ihe'used H'gh Speed TranSport ~'arg~. -2774- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page l0 Harper stated that making the existing Distdct harvesting equipment compatible with the used High Speed Transport Barge would not require significant adjustments. Any modifications will cost the District a nominal amount. Nybeck reported that the limited amount of zebra mussel inspections at selected public accesses began aroundthe Uemodal Day weekend. PUBLIC HEARING . Bayview Event Center, new multiple dock license, special density license, and variance applications on Excelsior Bay. The proposed variance application is for vadance from LMCD Code for an adjusted dock use area. Foster stated that the applicant had arrived and he opened the public headng at 8:40 p.m. He asked for background from staff, Nybeck made the following comments: · Mr. Bob Ziton, owner of Bayview Event Center, has submitted new multiple dock license, special density license, and vadance applications for the multiple dock fa'cility on Excelsior Bay in the City of Excelsior. The facility has 37 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) approved on 370' of continuous 929.4' shoreline, with a BSU density of 1:10'. The pier on the south for BSU's 1-26 does not comply with Code for side setback requirements because the south side site line extension diverges in front of the facility. · Applications have been submitted for two changes. First, the applicant proposes to deflect the south extended side site line approximately 30 degrees to the south. The abutting property to the south is Maynards Restaurant and both property owners have had applications submitted and approved by the Board with the proposed adjusted side site line extension. Second, the applicant proposes to increase the sizes of BSU's 33 and 34, both for overnight storage purposes, by moving one of them to the south of approved BSU 31. The applicant proposes to maintain the same number of approved transient BSU's at the facility, and ovemight storage BSU's, seven. · Code Section 2.03, subd. 7 requires a new multiple dock license application when there is any change in slip size, ownership, width, height or location of a structure under this section. Code Section 2.05, sub& 2 requires a special density license application for multiple dock facilities which provide for a watercraft storage density of greater than one watercraft per 50' of shoreline. The proposed change to increase the location and sizes of BSU's 33 and 34 from the approved site plan requires a new multiple dock license application. It was unclear to staff whether a special density license application should be submitted by the applicant to amend the 1/12/00 Special Density License Order and it seemed to make sense to advertise for it because both applications require a public headng. No changes have been' proposed to the number of approved BSU's and public amenities for their special density license. If the Board concludes that a special density license should not have been required for the proposed changes, the Board should refunding the $300 base fee submitted with the application. · Code Section 2.01 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for docking and storage of watercraft. The authorized dock use area is further defined by dock length and side setback requirements. A number of BSU's at this site are not contained within the authorized dock use area. These BSU's legally exist because they were either grandfathered or are part of an approved, variance for this site. However, it was recognized in the past year by staff and the applicant that the south extended side site line diverges in front of the applicant's facility. -2775- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page11 · Code Section 1.07 allows the Board to permit a vadance from Code, with conditions deemed necessary, where practical difficulties or particular hardships occur. In review of the proposed application, the Board should ensure that the practical difficulties Or particular hardships occur because of application of the Code. To ensure this, the Board should apply the following decision standards in the review of vadance applications, These decision standards include: 1) Is the proposed use reasonable, 2) Would it be unreasonable to require conformance to the ordinance, 3) Is the difficulty of conforming to the ordinance due 'to circumstances unique to the property, 4): Is the problem one created by the applicant, and 5) Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the locality. He stated that he believed the proposed variance application was reasonable. Conformance to the ordinance would be unreasonable because the platting of the properties in the area cause a practical difficulty of a converging lot line on the south side of the site. The same circumstances existed for the abutting property to:the north, Tonka Bay Sales, and the Board granted a variance at this property to deflect the south side site line extension slightly to the south. It appears that both the applicant and Maynards Restaurant have assumed the proposed adjusted dock use area was what they had to work with for docking and boat storage over the years. · In compliance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, the MN DNR and the City of Excelsior were provided copies of the proposed applications on 5/29/03, with comments due on 6/9/03. No feedback has been received from either agency on the proposed applications. · He believed that the Board could:approve all three applications for the 2003 season. Both the variance and special density license applications would' require the District attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval. If the Board concludes that the 1/t2/00 Special Density License Order is adequate and that new Findings are not necessary, the Board should ~nSider refunding the $300 base fee that accompanied the special density license application. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. There being no further comments. Foster closed the public hearing at 8:52 P.m. He stated that he did not believe the proposed special density license application was needed and that he would support refunding the $300 base fee. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Craig Nelson seconded to direct the District attomey to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the new multiple dock license and adjusted dock use variance applications, adding that the special density license application was not required and to refund the $300 base fee. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously 3. FINANCIAL A, Audit of vouchers. Skramstad reviewed =the-audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously. B, Review of draft 2004 LMCD Budget. Foster asked for an update on this agenda item. -2776- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page 12 Nybeck stated that the Board first reviewed the draft 2004 LMCD Budget at the 5/28/03. Regular Board Meeting.. This version was forwarded to the member cities affer this meeting and they were notified that comments are due in the District office by no later than June 23rd. A meeting was coordinated in the District office on June 6th to review the draff 2004 LMCD'Budget, noting that it was not well attended. Final review of the draft 2004 LMCD Budget is scheduled for the 6/25/03 Regular Board Meeting, with the ' approved budget to be forwarded to the cities by the July 1st deadline established by the District's state enabling legislation. Craig Nelson stated that he was disappointed that funds were not included in the draft 2004 LMCD Budget to be.transferred to the reserve accounts for Administration and EWM/Exotics. He added that funds are also not included in the draft 2004 LMCD Budget for depreciation of EWM harvesting equipment and he believed that this needs to be included in budgets for the District. C. Additional Business. Skramstad updated the Board on a recent discussion he had with Hennepin County Commissioner Linda Koblick regarding long-term funding of the Water Patrol projecL He believed that there would be some long,term challenges to fund this project 1.00 percent by Hennepin County, beginning in 2004, and the District might want to consider discussing other funding altematives. ADMINISTRATION A. Consideration of staff recommendation for compensation adjustment for Administrative Technician, Judd Harper. Foster stated that this agenda item would be pushed back to the 6/25/03 Regular Board Meeting. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 5. LAKE USE & RECREATION LeFevere updated the Board on liquor law changes adopted at the most recent legislative session that were raised at the last Board meeting. In the Code for charter boats, it references the closingtime required by the State of Minnesota for liquor licenses. However, it requires all passengers to be disembarked by 12:30 a.m. and charter boats to be tied at their home port of call at 1:00 a.m. Because of this, the change:: in closing tine from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. in the most recent legislative session would not be allowed under current Oode. If the Board has a desire to change the closing time for charter boats on Lake Minnetonka consistent with state law, this would require a change in Code for: time to disembark passengers andto be tied at their home port of call. The Board discussed this and the consensus was to make no changes to the Code unless requested by the Lake Minnetonka Charter Boat Association. 6. SAVE THE LAKE There was no discussion. -2777- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page 13 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Nybeck commented on the following: · The lake level as of 6/9/03 was 929.54', with a discharge of 125 c.f.s, · The most recent Lakeshore Weekly News article that summarized the 5~28~03 Regular Board Meeting was included in the handout folders for informational purposes. · There has been a docking complaint situation in the City of Deephaven that he would like to get feedback from the Board on how to proceed. He asked Foster to further comment on this. Foster stated that a formal docking complaint has been received from a neighbor in Deephaven at a private residence. There have previous complaints of this private residence over the years; however, they have been received from a previous neighbor on the other side. Four areas of non-compliance with Code exist at this property. They include the dock is too long, the dock is not contained within its authorized dock use area, there are too many restricted watercraft being stored at the dock, and the canopy is too large for the watercraft being stored within it. Staff has met with the property owner recently and Nybeck has informed him that there are a number of docks that are immediately to the south of the property in question that also have docks that are too long. The City of Deephaven, which has a firelane between the property in question and the party that filed the complaint, is contemplating whether they would also like to file a complaint themselves. He believed that the District would need to file a criminal complaint on this property owner and he indicated that Nybeck shad informed him that a certified survey would be required if the District was to proceed with a criminal complaint for the existing dock and watercraft not being contained within the authorized dock use area for this site. He suggested that the Board might be able to proceed without the survey and he questioned whether letters should be sent out to the other properties in the area that have docks that are too long. Nybeck stated that had recently met with Steve Tallen on-site and he suggested that the Board might want to consider whether to proceed with a criminal complaint or civil lawsuit, if necessary. LeFevere stated that the Board in the past has decided to proceed with a few civil lawsuits in the past because they believed it was sedous enough. In numerous cases, the Board has forwarded a cdminal compliant for prosecution and this has resulted in voluntary compliance by the party in question. Foster stated that he and Board in the past have been big supporters of voluntary compliance with non- compliance with Districi rules. He concurred with LeFevere that a criminal complaint frequently results in voluntary compliance. He expressed concern about spending money for a survey as requested by staff to verify non-compliance with the authorized dock use area and suggested that this might be documented through pictures or other evidence. The Board discussed this matter and the consensus of the Board was to write a letter to the party in question stating that they are in non-compliance and establish a deadline for compliance with the Code. The consensus of the Board was to not have a survey prepared at this time, to follow through on a formal criminal complaint if necessary, and to notify the residents in wdting to the south that there docks are too long and to educate them what they need to do to get in compliance with Code. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. -2778- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting June 11, 2003 Page14 9. NEW BUSINESS Groveland HOA- Measurinq of watercraft at LOA Suerth stated that he would like to discuss with the Board how the District measures the length of a watercraft. He reviewed a recent instance where the current dockmaster ind!cated to a resident in the Association that the boat they are storing in a slip exceeded 24' in length, althOugh the manufacturer and the title for the watercraft stateS that it is 24' in length. The problem is that the add-ons, such as the bowsrpit and the swimming platform, add length to the boat but the bow of the boat is 24' in length. He did not believe that this boat length restriction was practical because it is difficult for Associations to always understand what is going on with its residents. He recommended that the Board might want to consider re-evaluating how the length of watercraft is measured. The Board discussed this. request and the consensus of the Board was that no changes were necessary at this time. There was discUssion on how dealers market the watercraft that they sell and how this canchange for the consumer, There was discussion that that current measurement of length overall, with equipment in normal operating position~ is a fair and consistent wayof measuring boat length. HoWever, this will not allow the resident to purchase a :boat at the same length that the slip would allow for at length overall, with equipment at normal operating position. Update on Grays Bay Public Access Van Hercke reported to the Board that some residents in the area of the new public access on Grays Bay had expressed c0ncem about congestion in the area. This is pdmariiy focused under the County Road 101 bridge and the channel area in front of the access. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:54 p.m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -2779- BOARD MEMBERS Bert Foster Chair, Deephaven Craig Nelson Vice Chair, Spring Park Lili McMiltan Secretary, Orono Tom Skramstad Treasurer, Shorewood Bob Ambrose Wayzata Doug Babcock Tonka Bay Orv Burma Mound Miles Canning Greenwood Paul Knudsen Minnetrista Pete Nelson Victoria Tom Seuntjens Minnetonka Beach Herb Suerth Woodland Jose Valdesuso Excelsior Katy Van Hercke Minnetonka LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 MINNETONKA BLVD. · DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEPHONE 952/745-0789 · FAX 952/745~9085 Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR June 27, 2003 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LMCD Member Cities- City Administrators LMCD Board of Directors Greg Nybeck, Executive Directo~'~,,,~~ Adopted 2004 LMCD Budget Enclosed is a copy of the 2004 LMCD Budget, which was recently adopted and certified by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Board of Directors. Minnesota State Statute 103B.635, Subd. 1 requires the LMCD Board, on or before July 1 of each year, to prepare and submit a detailed budget of the District's needs for the next calendar year to the governing body of each municipality in the District with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each municipality. In late May, we forwarded a draft 2004 LMCD Budget that would levy $252,453 to the 14-member cities (compared to $244,995 in 2003). This increase of $7,458 was a concern to the Board of Directors because of the economic challenges that the member cities are facing. Thus, the Board of Directors reduced the levy by $8,000 at its 6/25/03 Regular Meeting, bringing the 2004 levy down just below the 2003 levy. Attached please find the details of the new budget. If your city has any comments about the adopted 2004 LMCD Budget, please let me know. We are glad to discuss this further and are required by state statute to schedule a public hearing on this matter, if requested. On behalf of the LMCD Board of Directors, I would like to thank all 14- member cities for their continued participation and support for District related activities. Feel free to contact me at the District office if you have questions or concerns. My e-mail address is: ~ybeck@lmcd.or[z. 50% Recycled Content 20% Post Consumer Waste Web Page Address: http://www.lmcd.org E-mail Address: Imcd @ Imcd.org -2780- -2781 - · '~10'"'q C~ C~ 0 GOO J~ ~ ~ I~ ~o o~ .~o oooo ~ lCD ~ 0 0 CD 0 O0 ~,~ 0 0 0 CD 0 0 C,,O ~ -2782- ' ~:~ b bbb b bb ~b~bbi~binbb~b o~ o o ooo o oo ~oc~oooooooo~o ~o 0 O0000 000 O0 0 O0 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 000 0 O0 0 00000 00000 0 °°°ooooooo o 0000000000000 ~ I; ' i. ~ i,. o ~ bbb ~ bb 000 0 00000 00000 0 o 0 0 0 000 0 O0 ~b~b~b~b~b~b ~0000000000~0 00000000000 O0 ~oooo~oo~o~o 0000000000000 -2783- rn ~ ~ m ~ rn '~ x ~ m c~ oo'~ m m ~ > m o o m O0 0000000 O0 0000000 000 000 0 00000 0 b~ oooo 000 0000 000 0000 0 0 0 00000 0 -2784- -2785- m -2786- -2787- Harbor Wine & Spirits June 03 Date 2003 2002 6/1/2003 6/2/2003 sunny 4324.55 6/3/2003 sunny 4375.68 6/4/2003 CLOUDY 4841.51 6/5/2003 RAIN 6748.54 6/6/2003 CLOUDY 10408.33 6/7/2003 sunny 12983.31 6/8/2003 6/9/2003 cloudy 5953.12 6/10/2003 sunny 4318.61 6/11/2003 CLOUDY 5716.67 6/12/2003 sunny 6292.57 6/13/2003 sunny 12663.37 6/14/2003 Hot 17958.18 6/15/2003 6/16/2003 sunny 5354.94 6/17/2003 sunny 5813.8 6/18/2003 sunny 5976.36 6/19/2003 sunny 6746.96 6/20/2003 sunny 13463.33 6/21/2003 RAIN 17281.12 6/22/2003 6/23/2003 RAIN 5131.21 6/24/2003 rain 5040.82 6/25/2003 RAIN 4972.66 6/26/2003 sunny 6649.92 6/27/2003 p.cloudy 11182.79 6/28/2003 SUNNY 13947.15 6/29/2003 6/30/2003 Totals Difference +1- 13338,15 287 291 4094.36 316 3808.11 350 4840.85 532 5684.15 637 10209.92 -13338.15 4324.55 281.32 1033.4 1907.69 4724.18 2773.39 362 282 4473.3 320 4306.58 358 4923.06 653 4502.26 837 11121.83 13651.64 360 378 3926.3 380 4502.68 419 4852.36 647 5868.23 803 9484.06 15621.8 347 329 4344.08 307 4688.38 382 4872.91 574 5739.21 656 11732.35 16390.84 5953.12 -154.69 1410.09 1369.51 8161.11 6836,35 -13651.64 5354.94 1887.5 1473.68 1894.6 7595.1 7797.06 -15621.8 5131.21 696.74 284.28 1777.01 5443.58 2214.8 -16390.84 0 -2788- SHERIFF'S REPORT A publication of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office SUMMER 2003 Sheriff Patrick D. McGowan Chandler, Cooper Named Inspectors to Fill Enforcement, Administration As the retirement incentives offered by Hennepin County begin to take effect, several command changes are in store for the Sheriff's Office. Captain Bill Chandler has been named by Sheriff Patrick McGowan to take over as Inspector of Enforcement Services upon the retirement of Inspector Bill Wilen later this summer. Captain Chandler will begin working with Inspector Wilen early in June to effect'a smooth transi- tion and will assume the Inspector's role on August 24. Chandler has been assigned to the Patrol Division since 1996. Sheriff McGowan said that Captain Chandler has demonstrated "the kind of leadership and depth of experience that is needed in this role." Captain Chester Cooper has been appointed as the Inspector of Administration to replace retiring Inspector Tom Cook. Inspector Cook has also announced that he will leave his position on August 23. Captain Cooper has served as the Administrative Captain since Decem- ber 2002. Sheriff McGowan praised Cooper's experi- Reflecting (From left)HCSO Honor Guard ~ members Sgt. Pete Sichko, Lt. John France and Deputy Brenda Barron were reflected in the Government Center pool during the annual reading of Hennepin County peace officers who have been killed in the line of duty since 1884. The ceremony took place May 15 during National Police Week. ence and understanding of Administrative issues. "Cap- tain Cooper has worked closely with Inspector Cook and will foster a seamless transition," Sheriff McGowan said. Captains Tim DaltOn and Richard Loose will also be leaving in late August. Captain Dalton heads the Com- munications Division. Captain Loose commands the Court Security Division and the Civil Unit. Other announcements on personnel changes are ex- pected early in the summer. The early retirement incen- tive offered by Hennepin County has resulted in 24 announced retirements in the Sheriff's Office represent- ing 599 years of experience. HCSO Has Nation's 'Top Dogs' It's a long way from the Humane Society to being the nation's top narc dog, but that just is exactly what K-9 Boston accomplished early in May. Boston, a seven- year-old American Water Spaniel, is handled by Deputy Dana Nelson and assigned to the Sheriff's Office Narcot- ics Unit. At the national trial of the United States Police Canine Asociation's annUal detector dog trials, Boston trotted off with first place honors, beating out 71 other talented pups. Boston earned his trophy by searching five cars and three rooms filled with junk.. K-9 Ally, handled by Deputy Rick Palaia, took second place for the inside search. Ally is also assigned to the Narcotics Unit and is also a former "pound puppy." In her first year on the job, she found more than $1 mil lion in illegal drugs. Boston and Ally along with handlers Nelson and Palaia teamed up for a second place finish in the best depart- ment team in the nation. The real performance by this talented duo takes place on the job. Last year, the sniffed out 1,645 pounds of marijuana, 41 pounds of cocaine, 20 pounds of meth- amphetamine, and $182,000 in cash. Not bad work for a couple of dogs someone sent to the "mane Society] r ,~5~ .' i i Brink's Cunman Sent Prison by HCSO Deputies Over 3 Years Ago k'S armored car guard Billy Strelow was ambushed murdered outside a Bloomington Target store almost five years ago~ The suspect escaped. Exactly a year later, HCSO Deputies Kimo Robertson and Steve Dummer attempted to apprehend Richard Ashton Oslund on a warrant for probation violation at a Minne- apolis house. After a search of the home with the Minne- apolis Police DepaKment, police believed that Ashton was not in the residence. Robertson and Dummer were not willing to give up the search. They asked for K-9 support and Deputy Tom Sigfrinius and K-9 Argus re- sponded. Argus alerted on a false wall and sure enough, the suspect was apprehended after a struggle] Ashton was sent back to prison for his probation viola- tion. ~Flerll'l' s l~eporL i I "This is another example of the potential dan- gers all our deputies face every day." Captain Bill Chandler Investigators continued to work the Strelow case never ''ng up their determination to solve it. md was released from prison on May 6, 2003. The same day, he was arrested for the murder of Billy Strelow. He has been Charged federally and is awaiting trial. At the time they arrested Ostlund, the HCSO deputies did not know he was a suspect in the Strelow case. Ostlund had a lot to lose the day deputies arrested him and that obviously created great danger for them. Had Ostlund not been detained in prison thanks to their ef- forts, he might have lOng since fled, preventing investiga- tors from bringing him to trial for Billy Strelow's murder. Great work by the Warrant Team, Deputy Sigfrinius and K-9 Argusl Permit Process Goes Smoothly Thanks to great planning and organization by Lt. John Cich, Jacqui Albright and their entire team, the first day of permit to carry applications went very smoothly in Hennepin County. There, were 42 in line when the doors opened at 8:30 a.m. A steady stream kept coming through- out the day, totaling 222. By June 13, 883 had applied. of the applicants commented on the ciency and customer-friendly attitude of the staff accepting applications. (See related story - next page) The Nose Knows! One of the Sheriff's Office's newest crime fighting tools is K- 9 Bunny, a Chocolate Lab, handled by Deputy Andy Peterson. Deputy Peterson and Bunny made their local debut this spring after three months of training together at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms on the east coast. Bunny is an explosives detection K-gand will take the place of K-9 Bette who retired earlier this spring. Don't let the name fool you - Bunny has proven that she knows her stuff! She will join two other recently trained ATF dogs in the Twin Cities. One will work for the Minneapolis Police Department and one with the ATF Minneapolis office. SHERIFF' S REPORT is a publication of the Hennepin Couuty Sheriff's Public Information Office Room 6, Courthouse 350 South Fifth Street Minaeapolis, MN 55415 Public Information Officer - Roseann Campagnoli (612) }48-7159 ro.~ea tin. ca mpagnoHC, a?o. hennepin, m ti. us -2790- Sheriff's Report Page 3 HCSO Launches Certification Class for Permit Seekers Many people seeking a permit under Minnesota's new Conceal/Carry Law have found themselves caught in the backlog of classes with local firearms instructors in order to meet the training requirements of the law. If you have had formal handgun training or are an experienced, Proficient handgun owner, the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office is offering a five-hour course that will satisfy the state requirements for completion of firearms safety training. This is not an introduction to basic firearms use. This class will result in certification that you have demonstrated proficiency. You must sign a waiver prior to attending the Sheriff's Office clasS that you have knowledge of handgun safety and function and can demonstrate proficiency. Shooting Review and a Firearms Proficiency Test. Classes will begin June 18 at the Law Enforcement Training Fac!lity, 11370 89th Avenue North, Maple Grove. Call 612-348-8008 TUesday-Thursday between 1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. for additional information and/ or to reserve a place in the class. The $250 fee must be prepaid and will cover instruction, the proficiency test and all range fees. Students must bring an unloaded, cased, legal and safe functioning handgun. You must also have a strong side holster that attaches to the belt with 50 rounds of factory ammunition. No reloads or magnum rounds are allowed. Recommended handguns are the .38 caliber special, 9 mm, or a .40 caliber. The class will cover Legal Issues including the Minne- sota Personal Protection Act and other related laws, Familiarization and Safety Lectures, a Fundamentals of Partici pants who successfully complete the class will receive a certificate that meets the requirements for the handgun permit under the new state law. Found in the Sheriff's Mailbag... '1 am writing to draw attention to the exemplary service of Deputies John Lechner and Shane Magnuson. The skill and professionalism of these deputies during the trial of State v. Burrell which concluded May 6, 2003 was the major reason that the emotional, highly charged environment surrounding the trial of an alleged Bloods gang member in the shooting death of an I I year old girl did not interfere with the defendant's receiving a fair trial. "Dear Sheriff McGowan: I appreciate your agreeing to bring in Sheriff's deputies to work'with our officers on the riots that followed the Go- phers Hockey NCAA victory. I believe that our concerted efforts at prevention resulted in participatio, n by fewer students that might have otherwise rioted, but the actions of that minority of students and other community youth were deplorable. Thank you for your cooperation, which helped to minimize the damage rioters perpetrated. Without your assistance, I have no doubt the consequences would have been far worse." Robert H. Bruininks President Univ. of Minnesota -2791 - The deputies' quiet control of the spectators, the media and the protection of the jurors significantly contributed to maintaining appropriate courtroom decorum. I especially appreciated the fact that I could devote all my attention to the witnesses and attorneys with the secure knowledge that the deputies would insure that the family and friends of neither the victim nor the defendant would cause any disruption. I was frankly concerned that the trial might become a focal point for confrontation between rival gangs. The deputies prevented any confrontation and prevented the jury from even seeing that possibility. ~ Judge Steven A. Pihlaja 4th Judicial District 4 Inspector Wilen Honored for Career ~eriff's R~nort Achievements Inspector Bill Wilen was honored April 3 at the HCSO Recognition Ceremony for nearly 30 years of distinguished service to the Sheriff's Office. Wilen began his career with HCSO on October 1, 1973 and since then, has held nearly every rank within the Sheriff's Office. In addition to his primary duties, Wilen also served as the commander of the Emergency Services Unit for many years and participated in over 250 opera- tions. In presenting Inspector Wilen for the award, Inspector Tom Cook also noted Wilen's contri- butions to the implementation of the 800-MHz radio system, the planning for the Public Safety Facility, the construction of the Crime Lab, upgrading the ESU, protocols for the investiga- tion of officer-involved shootings and expansion of the K-9 unit. Wilen has announced that he will retire at the end of August, just a month short of 30 years of service. l~gcgg N~ 'punol~ peo~ poo~v~e~ puno~ to ~:/.~: 'ON NI~I "S'ld~ aev~soa 's'n O,.LS (:l.I.S~ld -2792- ~ I'e~;~; N3g 'S!lod~atrat. IA! ~9aS tt~J!al q~nos 9snoq~,uo;3 '9 vaoo~I 3~.uoqs ~tmoD ta. dotraaH u~oD°~ '0 This Page. Is Left I ' ntent~onally Blank -2793-