2003-10-28PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
TUESDAY
OCTOBER 28, 2003
7:30 P.M.
MOUND CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted
by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or
Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal
sequence.
PAGE
1. OPEN MEETING
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS
*CONSENT AGENDA
*A. APPROVE MINUTES:
*B.
SEPT 23, 2003 SPECIAL MEETING
OCT 14, 2003 REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
*C. APPROVE PURCHASE RECOMMENDED BY POSAC
*D. APPROVE ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR DAILEY'S PUB
*E.
APPROVE A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MOUND VISIONS 2ND
ADDITION) 2002 - LEVY #15605
coMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY
ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER)
ACTION AWARDING FENCING CONTRACT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY
FACILITY, BY DON GEIGER OF AMCON
MCES PUMPING STATION, BELMONT LANE/CSAH 15, REPORT
BY MCES STAFF
3957
3958-3964
3965-3990
3991-3992
3993-3994
3995-4001
10.
11.
12.
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE
A. BRIEF PROJECT UPDATE
B. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT
ACTION ON DEVELOPM]ENT AGREEMENT FOR LANGDON TRAILS -
KMB DEVELOPMENT, LLC, 2241 SOUTI-IVIEW STREET
UPDATE ON MOTORIZED SCOOTER USE
ENGINEER' S REPORT
A. LOST LAKE GREENWAY PROJECT
B. WELL AND WELL HOUSE PROJECT
C. GROVE LANE WATER QUALITY
COMMUNITY DIRECTOR' S REPORT
A. 2003 FINAL HOUSING SCORE FROM MET COUNCIL
B. 2002-2003 ALOHA/EXPENDITURE FROM MET COUNCIL
C. TWIN CITIES DEMOGRAPHIC DATA FROM MET COUNCIL
4002-4015
4016
4017
4018-4021
4022-4024
4025-4047
13.
ACTION ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE
CODE
4048-4052
14.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Letters: Homecoming parade 4053-4055
B. Report: Harbor Wine and Spirits 4056-4057
C. Newsletter: Lake Minnetonka Association 4058-4063
D. Report: Finance Department 4064-4066
E. Correspondence: LMCC 4067-4083
F. Calendar: LMCC 4084-4085
G. Letter: Grant award to PD 4086
H. Newsletter: Mediacom 4087
I. Newsletter: Office of Secretary of State 4088
J. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative 4089-4090
K. Minutes: POSAC - Oct 9 4091
L. Newsletter: Westonka Public Schools 4092-4096
15. ADJOURN
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will, set a final agenda at the meeting.
current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site.
More
COUNCIL BRIEFING
October 28, 2003
OU comin Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
Oct 25 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Oct 28 - 7:30 - cc regular meeting
Oct 26 - Daylight Savings Time ends
Nov 6 - 6:30 - Budget workshop
Nov 10 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Nov 10 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Nov 13 - 6:30 -Budget workshop
Nov 17 - 6:30 -Tree lighting ceremony
Nov 25 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Nov 25 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Nov 26 - 11-1:30 - Fire Commission (Mayor only)
Dec 1 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing
Dec 8 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing continuation, if needed
Jan 17 - 10:00 - Open house and dedication of PS facility
Upcoming Absences
Dec 18-19 Kandis Hanson
Vacation
Ci,ty Hall Closed
Nov 11 Veteran's Day
Nov 27-28 Thanksgiving
Dec 25-26 Christmas
#4.C. POSAC recommendation
At an earlier budget meeting, POSAC requested that the Council consider using Park Dedication Funds for the
purchase of the drinking fountain at Weiland Park. This is there formal recommendation.
#4.E. MetroPlains assessments
MetroPlains has requested that assessments for the housing units be spread over 15 years rather than l 0 years.
Staff sees no issues with extending the time. Many o£them will be paid for much sooner as units are sold and
closed. More importantly, it reduces MetroPlains' obligation while units continue to be under construction.
#6~ Fencing contract
The award of the fencing contract for the public safety facility was delayed to reconsider the design in an effort
to cut costs. The cost of the new low bid under the new design is $25,000 less than under original design. Staff
recommends its award.
Human Resources
I am pleased to announce that Greg Pederson, Interim Fire Chief, has accepted the position of Fire Chief for the
City of Mound Fire Department, effective January 1, 2004. Greg has been with the Fire Department for 28
years, and was voted as Chief by popular vote of the Department in 1999. In 2002, Greg was offered the
interim paid chief position and, over the last 3-4 years, has proven himself to be qualified and suited to hold the
position on an extended basis. Due to resounding support by the City Council, the member cities and the Fire
membership, a search has been foregone, which will maintain the continuity of Department
operations in this time of transition. Congratulations to Greg!
Other
Penney §teele has ~oeen invited to attend the ~qoveml>er 10 council meeting. It is intended as a public relations
visit with no particular agenda. Council members should formulate their questions for her and, if you wish, you
send them to me in advance and so I may forward them to her for her advance preparation.
We were supposed to consider and approve the CSAH 15/110 construction agreement at the Oct 28 meeting,
but the County missed the deadlines. It is likely that we will be doing so at the meeting Ms Steele attends.
The controlled bum planned for this Saturday at the house being purchased by the Gillespie Center has been
postponed once again.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 23, 2003
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special
session on Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 6:40 p.m. at city hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek and Peter Meyer.
Others Present: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Acting City Manager Gino Businaro,
Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Roger and Joanne Reed, Dave Willette,
Paul Pond, Guy Nowlan, Jim Grube, Brad Moe.
1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m.
2. PRESENTATION BY GUY NOWLAN OF HENNEPIN COUNTY ENGINEERING
Guy Nowlan reviewed the three phases of the CSAH 15 realignment project, followed
by review of the project schedule. It is proposed that by the Fall of 2003 the roadway
will be totally drivable, with the final wear course and landscaping to be completed in the
Spring of 2005.
Brad Moe answered questions from property owners involved in the project, and
reviewed the status of land acquisition.
3. ADJOURN
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 7:26 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
Attest: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter
Mayor Pat Meisel
-3957-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 14, 2003
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular
session on Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 6:00 p.m.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek and Peter Meyer.
Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk
Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Planner Loren
Gordon, City Engineer John Cameron, Chuck Alcon, Jim Dailey, Don Geiger, Amy
Cicchese, Christine Anderson, Doug Berdie, Ann Eberhart, Rhonda Nelson, David
Hanson, Steve Matheson, James Veit, Cathy Veit, Jill Moen, Matthew Orinstien, Steve
Matheson.
Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be
routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no
separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in
normal sequence.
'1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. at the Public Safety Facility, as
posted.
2. TOUR OF PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
Following the tour of the public safety facility, Mayor Meisel recessed the meeting, to
reconvene at City Hall.
3. CONTINUE MEETING TO CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4. RECONVENE MEETING
Mayor Meisel reconvened the meeting in the council chambers of city hall at 7:30 p.m.
5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
6. APPROVE AGENDA
Brown requested the addition of item 13A, Motorized Scooters
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the agenda as amended. All voted
in favor. Motion carried.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
Hanus requested the removal of items 7G and 71, for the purpose of discussion.
1
-3958-
Mound Council Minutes - October 14, 2003
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda as amended.
Upon roll call vote, all vote in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve minutes of September 23, 2003 regular meeting
B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $589,143.42.
C. Approve final payment request to Landwehr Construction for $1,959.75.
D. Approve Payment Request No. 1 to Environmental Associates for $135,976.89,
for the Lost Lake Greenway project.
E. Approve Payment Request No. 1 to Traut Wells for $45,286.50 for Municipal Well
No. 8.
F. Approve Payment Request No. 3 to Valley Paving, Inc., for $63,083.30 for the
2003 Street Reconstruction Project.
G. (removed)
H. Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 1 for $11,385.00, with Environmental
Associates, Inc., for the Lost Lake Greenway Project
I. (removed)
7G. CASE #03-42: JENSEN VARIANCE FOR LAKESIDE SETBACK - 2684
WlLSHIRE BLVD.
Hanus requested the removal of the 5th "whereas" paragraph on packet page 3780.
Hanus also questioned the setback of the shed on the proposed property, and if it
should be considered for a variance at this time if it's non-conforming. John Dean
suggested not to consider the shed at this time because it hasn't been addressed to this
point with this case, and if the shed were legal when built it can remain until it needs to
be replaced, then it needs to meet the code requirements.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution as amended.
The following voted in favor: Brown, Meisel, Osmek and Meyer. The following voted
against: None. Councilmember Hanus abstained because of the shed setback issue.
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-85: A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A LAKESHORE
SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW REPLACEMENT OF A DECK AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A GAZEBO AT 2684 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, P&Z CASE
#03-42, PID #24-117-24-13-0031.
71. ACTION AMENDING SECTION 800.00 OF THE CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO
INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to pass the following ordinance as amended.
All voted in favor. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 10-2003: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 800.00 OF THE
CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES
2
-3959-
Mound Council Minutes - October 14, 2003
8. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT
ON THE AGENDA
Jill Moen, 1580 Heron Lane, appeared before the Council with pictures illustrating the
driveway installed by her neighbor. The neighbor paid for with the 2003 Street
Reconstruction project, and now has two driveway aprons, and a circular drive on his
property, which he covered with woodchips. Moen's question ,was who is going to clean
up the woodchips when they wash onto her property and into the lake and stormsewers.
John Cameron was under the impression that this driveway was going to be gravel, not
woodchips, but there is nothing in the current city code that dictates the finish on a
driveway. After discussion, it was decided that the ordinance regarding driveways will
be referred to the Planning Commission for discussion and recommendations. The
Council will then revisit this topic at a future meeting.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 2003 Central Business District Parking Maintenance
Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. and closed the hearing at 7:58
p.m. after no comments were offered.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by' Osmek to adopt the following resolution. The
following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer. The following voted
against: None. Mayor Meisel abstained as she owns property within the CBD.
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-86: RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2003 CBD PARKING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY
AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST. LEVY #15856
B. Delinquent Sewer and Water Bills
Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. and closed the hearing at 8:01
p.m. after no comments were offered.
MOTION by Hanusk seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-87: RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2003 DELINQUENT WATER &
SEWER ASSESSMENT TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6%
INTEREST, LEVY #15858
C. Water Line Relocation at 2560 Avon
Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:02 p.m. and closed the hearing at 8:03
p.m. after no comments were offered.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
3
-3960-
Mound Council Minutes - October 14, 2003
RESOLUTION NO. 03-88: RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER
LINE RELOCATION AND CERTIFYING TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6%
INTEREST, LEVY #15857
D. 2003 Street Reconstruction Project
City Engineer John Cameron reviewed the project and the preliminary estimates versus
the final project costs. He presented a final assessment roll to the Council that reflected
that the final projects costs were less than the preliminary assessment roll indicated.
Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:14 p.m.
Doug Berdie, 5028 Enchanted Lane, asked if the project is complete and Cameron
stated that it is basically done. Berdie asked if less work was done than originally
anticipated and Cameron informed him more work had to be done on Crestview and
Gull than anticipated. Berdie asked if the $11.08/lineal foot includes driveways and was
informed that it does.
Jill Moen, 1580 Heron Lane, asked about her property assessment, because she
actually has no frontage on the improved street, as her driveway comes off of a corner.
Cameron explained that she was assessed for the 40' minimum, in accordance with the
city's assessment policy.
Matthew Orinstien, 4925 Glen Elyn Road, asked about how the interest rate was
decided and was informed it was based on the bond rate, administration charges, etc.
Steve Matheson, 4944 Crestview, got clarification on how his two lots were assessed.
Mayor Meisel closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-89: RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR 2003
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT - LEVY #15860.
E. Miscellaneous Assessments
Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. and closed the hearing at 8:31
p.m. after no comments were offered.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-90: RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR
MISCELLANEOUS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS AND CERTIFYING TO THE
COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST, LEVY #15859
4
-3961 -
Mound Council Minutes - October 14, 2003
10. PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY - DON GEIGER OF AMCON
A. Action Awardinq Fencinq Contract
Geiger informed the Council that he is not asking for action on this item because since
receiving bids they have found possible ways to save some money and will have a
revised request for the next meeting.
B. Action Releasinq $10,000 of General Conditions Fundinq
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to approve the release of $10,000 of General
Conditions Funding to be used for add-alternates. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
Geiger indicated that the ' is still under budget and on schedule for December 1st
17thp roject
completion. January is scheduled for the grand opening and tours.
11. LANGDON TRAILS
A. ACTION ON FINAL PLAT
Loren Gordon reviewed the final plat resolution and conditions contained therein. He
stated staff has reviewed the drainage concerns expressed by the neighbors and is
comfortable with the solution. He stated that the original applicant, WARA real estate
has turned over their authority to a partner, Kelly Downey, who will be managing the
project from the development side. Chuck Alcon of WARA will still be involved with the
progress of the building of the homes, etc.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the following resolution. All voted
in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-91: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR
THE LANGDON TRAILS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. P&Z CASE #03-44, PID
#14-1 '17-24-34-0004.
B. Early Start Agreement
Gordon stated the applicant is requesting an early start agreement to accommodate
installation of utilities, curb and Class 5, prior to recording of the plat so that construction
of three single-family homes may commence.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the Early Start Agreement with
KMB Development, LLC, with regards to Langdon Trails. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
C. Stormwater and Erosion Control Permit Application
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution as amended.
All voted in favor. Motion carried.
5
-3962-
Mound Council Minutes- October 14, 2003
RESOLUTION NO. 03-92: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT APPLICATIONS FROM KMB
DEVELOPMENT, LLC FOR LANGDON TRAILS, A 13-LOT RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION. PID #14-1'17-24-34-0004.
12. ACTION ON FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION PERMIT - SARENPA~ 5446
BARTLETT BLVD.
Sarah Smith reviewed the application for an after the fact permit to get the property in
compliance with local and state rules. Staff recommends approval which is supported
with the proposed resolution.
Meyer asked if a permit is needed for this under city code subsection 350.1100. Smith
responded that city staff has determined that a permit under city code does not apply
because the wetland boundary for this area is established by the 929.4 ordinary high
watermark, as officially adopted pursuant to 350.1115, and the wetland activities on this
parcel are located at the 929.6 elevation.
Osmek stated that he has gone through this application many times and expressed his
disapproval, but has received the professional opinion of city staff, and in the absence
of finding of fact in the negative, feels his hands are tied. He's looked for a reason not
to approve this and one hasn't been shown to him.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution as amended.
The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Osmek. The following voted against:
Meyer. Mayor Meisel abstained from voting.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-93: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FLOODPLAIN
ALTERATION PERMIT (MCWD RULE C) AND CERTIFICATE OF WETLAND
EXEMPTION FROM MARTIN SARENPA FOR THE PROPERTY LOATED AT 5446
BARTLETT BOULEVARD, PID #24-117-24-22-0003.
David Hanson, 2583 Lost Lake Road, stated that he is very upset with this approval and
the decision of the Council is unacceptable.
Cathy Veit, 2563 Lost Lake Road, asked what the procedure is from here, who will be
supervising the activity and what is the timetable. Smith explained the process and
notifications that will occur, and stated that she will keep Veit informed.
Osmek wanted to make a point of information regarding the dock issue previously
discussed. City staff has determined that the dock wasn't located in the correct place,
and Osmek asked if the dock permit can be rescinded if the applicant doesn't relocate
the dock to its correct location, or if the site would be removed entirely. It was
determined that either could be done.
6
-3963-
Mound Council Minutes - October 14, 2003
Osmek also asked about the issue of number of dwellings on the property. Smith stated
that it has been determined that there are two dwellings in the house, which is not
allowed, and the property owner has asked that he have until December 1st to rectify the
situation, giving the tenant ample time to relocate. Hanus asked if the property has
been cited for this and Smith answered not to her knowledge. Hanus asked that the
property be cited immediately because this is the first step in the court process, should
the matter get that far. Smith will work with the prosecuting attorney with regard to this
issue.
13. SET SPECIAL BUDGET WORKSHOPS
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to set two special budget workshops for
November 6, 2003, at 6:30 p.m. and November 13, 2003, at 6:30 p.m. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
13A. MOTORIZED SCOOTERS
Brown requested the addition of this item to the agenda for purposes of discussion. He
would like to see if there is a way that the city can allow kids to ride their motorized
scooters within the city. Kandis Hanson indicated that John McKinley has previously
prepared a memo with regard to motorized scooters, and will get a copy of this to the
Council for future consideration.
14. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. FYi: Charitable gambling donation
B. FYI: Letters on crosswalks
C. Report: Police Department- Aug 2003
D. Letters: Homecoming Parade
E. Letter: Contribution to Taste of the Lakes
F. Article: From the Charlotte ICMA Conference
G. Minutes: Docks and Commons Commission
H. Newsletter: Gillespie Center
I. Correspondence: LMCD
J. Calendars: LMCC
K. City Clerk Bonnie Ritter receives certificate of distinction
15. ADJOURN
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 9:40 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
Attest: Bonnie Rifler, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
7
-3964-
OCTOBER 28, 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
101003SU E$2,299.00 OCT
101703SU E$538.71 OCT
102203SU E$1,821.62 OCT
102803SU E$1,041,008.63 OCT
TOTAL
$1,045,667.96
-3965-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
10/14/03 10:35 AM
Page 1
Batch Name
101003SUE
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
User Dollar Amt $22,997.69
Computer Dollar Amt $22,997.69
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 101003 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-03 THRU 09-18-03 e543-004-818-801 $15.98
Invoice lb1003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.98
Refer 101003 FIRE CHIEF, MN ASSOCIATION
Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 10-15-03 CONFERENCE PEDERSON $160.00
Invoice 101003 10/10/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $160.00
Refer 101003 NICCUM, DANIEL
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $498.71
Invoice 101003
Transaction Date 10/13/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $498.71
Refer 101003 SUPERIOR FORD FLEET~GOVERN
Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA 2004 FORD CROWN VICTORIA POLICE $22,323.00
INTERCEPTOR
Invoice 17818 10/10/2003 PO 17818
Transaction Date 10/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22,323.00
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$22,821.71
$160.00
$15.98
$22,997.69
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$22,997.69
$22,997.69
-3966-
CITY OF MOUND
Batch Name 101703SUE
Payments
Refer 101703 LAKEVILLE, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 101403
Cash Payment
Invoice 101403
Cash Payment
Invoice 101403
Cash Payment
Invoice 101403
Transaction Date
PO 17977
E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training
PO 17977
E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training
E 101-42400-434 Conference & Training
10/14/2003
City of Mound 10/17/0311:01 AM
?age 1
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
User Dollar Amt $538.71
Computer Dollar Amt $538.71
$0.00 In Balance
2003 MUNICIPALS, SCHWALBE, SUE $38.00
2003 MUNICIPALS, ROBERTS, COLLETTE $38.00
2003 MUNICIPALS DEBORD, JEANNE $38.00
2003 MUNICIPALS, NORLANDER, JILL $38.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $152.00
Refer 101703 MINNETRISTA, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 10-23-03 SEMINAR
Invoice 101703
Transaction Date 10/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
$15.00
Total $15.00
Refer 102703 MOUND POST OFFICE
Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $121.67
3voice 101703 10/17/2003
Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $121.67
Invoice 101703 10/17/2003
Transaction Date 10/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $243.34
Refer 101703 VERIZON WIRELESS (FIRE~FIN)
Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 09-03 296-9058 FINANCE $8~10
Invoice 101703
Cash Payment $20.81
invoice 101703
Cash Payment $20.81
Invoice 101703
Cash Payment $20.81
invoice 101703
Cash Payment $0.58
Invoice 101703
Cash Payment $0.58
Invoice 101703
Cash Payment $2.06
Invoice 101703
Cash Payment $8.10
Invoice 101703
Cash Payment $46.52
Invoice 101703
Transaction Date 10/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $128.37
E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells
E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells
E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells
E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells
E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells
E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells
E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells
E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells
09-03 590-4351 PNV
09-03 590-4351 P/W
09-03 590-4351 P/W
09-03 723-7560 MOUND FIRE
09-03 751-3572 ENGINE #18
09-03 751-3573 MOUND FIRE
09-03 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCK
09-03 240-5244 HANSON
-3967-
CITY OF MOUND
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
801 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
City of Mound
Payments
10/17/03 11:01 AM
Page 2
Current Period: October 2003
10100 Wells FargO
$242.43
$11.32
$142.48
$142.48
$538.71
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$538.71
$538.71
.I
-3968-
CITY OF MOUND
Batch Name 102803@UE
Payments
Refer 102803 ACTION RADIO AND COMMUNICA
Cash Payment
invoice 102803
Transaction Date
E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals
10/9/2003 PO 17968
10/20/2003
City of Mound 10/23/031:41 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
User DollarAmt $1,045,366.38
Computer DollarAmt $1,045,366.38
$0,00 In Balance
MOBILE RADIOS IN VEHICLES $3,085.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,085.00
Refer 102803 ALLIED MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $202,942.00
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $202,942.00
Refer 102803 AMCON
Cash Payment E 496-46680.500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $19,049.32
Invoice 2478 9~30~2003
Transaction Date 10/2212003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19,049.32
Refer 102803 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSO
Cash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $124.00
Invoice 20000288706 10117/2003 PO '17978
Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo . '10100 Total $124.00
102803 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE
Invoice 463328711 10/14/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-2§5 Misc Merchandise For R ICE
Invoice 463328111 10/8/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo
$77.08
$109.16
10100 Total $186.24
Refer 102803 ASPEN EMBRO/DERY AND DESIG
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date
10/13/2003
E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
10/13/2003
E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
10113/2003
E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms
10/13/2OO3
E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
10/13/2003
E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
10/13/2003
E 609-49750-218 Clothing and Uniforms
10/13/2003
10/13/2003
Refer 102803 AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA
Payment
102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies
E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous
EMBROIDER CITY LOGO
EMBROIDER CITY LOGO
EMBROIDER CITY LOGO
EMBROIDER CITY LOGO
EMBROIDER CITY LOGO
EMBROIDER CITY LOGO
EMBROIDER CITY LOGO
Wells Fargo 10100
AUG,SEPT WATER SERVICE
AUG,SETP WATER SERVICE
Total
$15.98
$15.98
$15.96
$47.93
$28.76
$19.17
$1,210.80
$1,354.58
$85.13
$85.t3
-3969-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 10/21/2003
City of Mound
Payments
10123/03 1:41 PM
Page 2
Current Period: October 2003
~,-~~,.~
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $170.26
Refer 102803 BALBOA CENTER LIMITED PARTN
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date
E 496-46580-412 Building Rentals
10/23/2003
11-03 TEMPORARY FIRE STATION
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$4,357.75
$4,357.75
Refer 102803 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS
Invoice 37659000 10/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise ForR MISCELLANEOUS
Invoice 37617800 10/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 27582000 10/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-25t Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 27596400 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 27588000 10/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
invoice 38666300 10/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
invoice 27661900 10/20/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
invoice 27619200 10/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 27653600 10/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS
Invoice 37644600 10/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 27539800 10/6/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo
Refer 102803 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-42400-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE
Invoice 378113 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous COFFEE
Invoice 378113 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE
Invoice 378113 10/15/2003
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$50.00
$98.93
$858.00
$2,069.90
$77.75
$609.00
$664.90
$1,340.00
$330.45
$79.15
$615.35
$6,793.43
$8.50
$4.25
$21.25
10100 Total $34.00
Refer 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date 10/22/2003
Refer 102803 BRW ENTERPRISES
BODINE, CRANE
G 101-22953 5019 Wren Rd House Remov REIMBURSE ESCROW
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 9742 10/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 9735 10/9/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003
$5,000.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00
LIQUOR $652.50
LIQUOR $276.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $928.50
-3970-
City of Mound 10/23/031:41 PM
Page 3
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: October 2003
Refer 102803 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials
3/4 MINUS (CL2) $830.35
Invoice 102803 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $830.35
Refer 102803 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE
Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 09-03 CONNECT CHARGE $630.00
invoice P07MN02713994 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.00
Refer 102803 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNT
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies UTILITY BILLS $356.63
Invoice 31729 10/17/2003 PO 17933
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies UTILITY BILLS $356.63
Invoice 31729 10/17/2003 PO 17933
Cash Payment E 670-49500-210 Operating Supplies UTILITY BILLS $178.32
Invoice 31729 10/17/2003 PO 17933
Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs UTILITY BILLS $178.32
Invoice 31729 10/17/2003 PO 17933
Transaction Date 10/22/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,069.90
Refer 102803 CEILINGS AND FLOORS, INCORP
Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $26,082.00
102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26,082.00
Refer 102803 COCA COLABOTTLING-MIDWEST
Cash 15ayment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $154.60
Invoice 63437192 10/16/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $154.60
Refer 102803 COMPUTER CHEQUE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 09-03 CHECK VERIFICATION $54.50
Invoice 106850903 10/1/2003
Transaction Date 10/22/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.50
Refer 102803 CROW RIVER SUSPENSION AND
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ALIGNMENT TRUCK #9 $35.57
Invoice 3869 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ALIGNMENT TRUCK #9 $35.56
Invoice 3869 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ROTATE TIRES TRUCK #20 $103.79
Invoice 3868 10/8/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $174,92
Refer 102803 CRYSTAL WELDINGi /NCSRPORA
Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies VINIYL INTERIOR WALLS,ETC $494.04
Invoice 00122514 10/14/2003 PO 17962
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $494.04
102803 DALCO ROOFING AND SHEET ME
E 496-46580-500 Capital. Outlay (GENE~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $46,930.00
Invoice 102803 10128~2003
Transaction Date 10121/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $46,930.00
-3971 -
CiTY OF MOUND
Refer 102803 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment
Invoice 238344
Cash Payment
Invoice 239183
Cash Payment
Invoice 239186
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
III ' I'1'1'11
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
10/14/2003
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
10121/2003
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
10/21/2003
10/23/2003 Wells Fargo
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 4
$624.00
$1,898.40
$16.90
10100 Total $2,539.30
Refer 102803 DEEPHAVEN, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 100903 10/9/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003
~OND VOGEL PAINTS
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials
Invoice 3011058
Cash Payment
Invoice 3584206
Transaction Date
9124/2003 PO 17939
E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Matedals
10/10/2003
LAKE MTKA EMERGENCY PLAN $122.84
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $122.84
HOUSING,KIT,TIP,ETC
TRAFFIC PAINT WHITE
Wells Fargo 10100
$462.33
$462.33
Total $924.66
Refer 102803
Cash P ~ayment
Invoice 200491 10/16/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 EAST S/DE BEVERAGE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 220264 10/20/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 220265 10/20/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 220266 10/20/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 41033 10/16/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 220175 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 220174 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 220079 10/6/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 220078 10/6/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 EMPIREHOUSE, INCORPORATED
DOCKMASTERS OF LAKE MINNET
E 281-45210-440 Other Contractual Servic REMOVE DOCK SECTIONS
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFORMS, I .
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply WINTERIZE IRRIGATION
Invoice 3454 10/14/2003
$3,122.00
Total $3,122.00
$5,305.70
-$15.00
$10.40
$118.50
$53.70
$1,662.40
$32.90
$2,270.85
Total $9,439.45
$48,676.00
Total $48,676.00
$59.95
-3972-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 10/20/2003
City of Mound 0/23/031:41 PM
Page 5
Payments
CUrrent Period: October 2003
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.95
Refer 102803 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 10-01-03THRU 02-29-04 MAINTENANCE $944.00
CONTRACT
Invoice S258101703 10116/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $944.00
Refer 102803 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-07-03 UNIFORMS $28.35
Invoice 712953
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-07-03 UNIFORMS $28.35
Invoice 712953
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-07-03 UNIFORMS $28.34
Invoice 712953
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 10-07-03 MATS $24.57
Invoice 712953
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 10-07-03 MATS $24.57
Invoice 712953
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 10-07-03 MATS $24.57
Invoice 712953
Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 10-14-03 MATS $56.47
719631
Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 10-14-03 MATS $48.14
Invoice 719632
Cash Payment 10-14-03 MATS $98.27
Invoice 719633
Cash Payment 10-14-03 MATS $30.95
Invoice 719629
Cash Payment 10-14-03 UNIFORMS $28.31
Invoice 719630
Cash Payment 10-14-03 UNIFORMS $28.31
Invoice 719630
Cash Payment 10-14-03 UNIFORMS $28.31
Invoice 719630
Cash Payment 10-14-03 MATS $35.17
Invoice 719630
Cash Payment 10-14-03 MATS $35.17
Invoice 712953
Cash Payment 10-13-03 MATS $35,17
Invoice 712953
Transaction Date 10/22/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $583.02
Refer 102803 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE REPAIRS $1,000,59
Invoice 61112 9/9/2003
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000,59
E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services
E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services
E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials
E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials
E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials
102803 GOES LITHOGRAPHING COMPAN
Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies STATIONERY PRODUCTS $57,10
nvoice 839759 10/7/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $57.10
-3973-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound 10/23/031:41 PM
Page 6
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
Refer 102803 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $934.00
Invoice 58679 10/10/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $934.00
Refer 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice S5147701
Transaction Date 10/21/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 784568 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 784567 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
invoice 784566 1018/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 784487 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 784226 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 789229 10/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE
Invoice 623000 ' 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR
Invoice 622823 10/3/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 787903 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 787904 10/15/2003
Cash Payment
Invoice 788439
Cash Payment
Invoice 787902
GREENHECK
E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
Wells Fargo 10100
10100
E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS
10/16/2003
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
10/15/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo
HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 46574 9/12/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 46669 9/29/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repalr/Maint Supply
Invoice 46689 9/24/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repalr/Maint Supply
Invoice 46689 9/2412003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 46689 9/24/2003
Transaction Date 10/16/2003
Refer 102803
3/4 PIPE FEMALS
ALUMINUM HOSE TRAY
GENERATOR GUARDS
GENERATOR GUARD
GENERATOR GUARD
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMA TIO
$30,672.00
Total $30,672.00
$775.02
$96,25
$251.76
$0.00
$130.93
$494.70
-$240.00
-$6.34
$4.2.25
$915.68
$377.76
$1,821.80
Total $4,659.81
$25.56
$125.00
$10.43
$10.43
$10.44
Total $181.86
-3974-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 0310709
Transaction Date
City of Mound 10/23/031:41 PM
Page 8
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply TIGER TAIL HOSE $62.70
10/2/2003
10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $62.70
Refer 102803
ISLAND PARK SKELL Y
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery R&R MOUNT ENGINE $74.13
Invoice 14476 9/30/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERY $28.99
invoice 14505 9~30~2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERY $28.99
Invoice 14505 9130/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTER $28.99
Invoice 14505 9/30/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HUB ASSEMBLY $1,453.04
Invoice 14549 10/3/2003
Transaction Date 10/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,614,14
Refer 102803 JAKUBIK, MATTHEW
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
invoice 101503 8/7/2003
Transaction Date 10/17/2003
102803 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED
Payment E 101-41110-350 Printing
Invoice 48007 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/16/2003
REIMBURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES $31.96
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.96
2003 FALL NEWSLETTER $1,618.80
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,618.80
Refer 102803 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS
Cash Payment G 101-22810 X-Mas Lights Donation/Expe
invoice 125209
Cash Payment
Invoice 607922
Cash Payment
Invoice 125321
Cash Payment
Invoice 875551
12/16/2002
E 101-41910-200 Office Supplies
E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
2/18/2003
E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
5/9/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003
efer 102803 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment
Invoice 1623267
Cash Payment
Invoice 1623268
Cash Payment
Invoice 1623269
Cash Payment
Invoice 1623270
Cash Payment
Invoice 233567
~sh Payment
233449
Cash Payment
Invoice 162485
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
10/812003
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
10/8/2003
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
10/8/2003
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
10/8/2003
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
10/9/2003
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
10/8/2003
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
10/15/2003
HOLIDAY BULBS $165.08
PAPER $79.76
BASKETS, ETC $4.11
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $2.13
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $251.08
LIQUOR $251.26
LIQUOR $995.09
LIQUOR $812.95
WINE $91~00
CREDIT--LIQUOR -$14,99
CREDIT-WINE -$20.69
WINE $1,311.10
-3975-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 7
Current Period: October 2003 ·
Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals 09-03 RADIO LEASE
Invoice 23098024 10/1/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
Cash Payment G 101-22966 Gillespie Sign Variance #03- ~RESOLUTION RECORDING
Invoice 102803 9/1/2003
Cash Payment G 101-22867 Walnut Lane, 00-56, Hinrichs RESOLUTION RECORDING
Invoice 102803 9/512003
Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing EASEMENT COPY
Invoice 102803 9/2/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 316301 10/20/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
$1,218.26
Total $1,218.26
$46.00
$26.00
$26.00
Total $98.00
$188.45
Total $188.45
Refer 102803 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I
Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 100703-A 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 100703-B 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 100703-C ' 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 100703-D 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 100703-E 10/7/2003
Transaction Date 10/22/2003
Refer 102803 HUMANE SOCIETY WRIGHT COUN
09-03 LOST LAKE GREENWAY
09-03 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE
09-03 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING
09-03 MOUND VISION
09-03 TIF RELATED WORK
Wells Fargo 10100
$5,527.48
$4,861.81
$847.92
$833.00
$650.00
Total $12,720.21
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date
E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees
10/3/2003
E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees
10/3/2003
E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees
10/3/2003
10/10/2003
07-03 IMPOUND SERVICES
08-03 IMPOUND SERVICES
09-03 IMPOUND SERVICES
Wells Fargo 10100
$75.00
$267.50
$150.00
Total $492.50
Refer 102803 IKON OFFICE MACHINES
Cash Payment E 101-43100-202 Duplicating and copying
invoice 23965738 10/16/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-202 Duplicating and copying
Invoice 23965738 10/18/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying
Invoice 23965738 10/16/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003
Refer
10-12-03 THRU 01-12-04 COPIER
MAINTENANCE
10-12-03 THRU 01-12-04 COPIER
MAINTNANCE
10-12-03 THRU 01-12-04 COPIER
MAINTENANCE
Wells Fargo 10100
102803 INFRATECH
$55.36
$55.36
$55.37
Total $166.09
-3976-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound 10/23/031:41 PM
Page 9
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
Cash Payment E $0g-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $204.75
Invoice 1626484 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,151.86
Invoice 1626483 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $298.88
Invoice 1626482 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $554.04
Invoice 1626481 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $115.80
Invoice 1623533 10/9/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,751.05
Refer 102803 JONES AND SON BLACKTOPPING
Cash Payment E 101-45200-430 Miscellaneous BLACKTOP DEPOT LOT
Invoice 102803 10/10/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 102803 JUBILEE FOODS
Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 102803 10/11/2003
Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services
.n voice 102803 10/11/2003
ansaction Date 10/15/2003
10-11-03 CLEANUP DAY
10-11-03 CLEANUP DAY
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$9,500.00
$9,500.00
$22,30
$59.71
$82.01
Refer 102803 KELLEHER CONSTRUCTION,/NCO
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFE'PC BUILDING
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$12,920.00
$12,920.00
Refer 102803 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION, IN
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$2,735.00
$2,735,00
Refer 102803 LAKER NEWSPAPER
Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 09-27-03 PROPOSES ASSESSMENTS
Invoice 796 9/2712003
Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 09-27-03 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
Invoice 797 9/27/2003
Transaction Date 10/15/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
To~l
$71.64
$59.70
$131.34
Refer 102803 LANO EQUIPMENT, INCORPORAT
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair SERVICE CALL NO POWER
Invoice 96905 9/26/2003
Transaction Date 10/22/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
Cash Payment
Invoice 1348129
ash Payment
1348129
ash Payment
Invoice 1348129
Total
E 10%43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
10/9/2003
E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
10/9/2003
E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
10/9/2003
$279.19
$279.19
$11.28
$11.28
$11.29
-3977-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 10
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 10100
Refer 102803 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T
Cash Payment E 101-41110-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $87,06
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 101-41310-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $70.13
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 101-41500-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $193.46
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42110-151 Worker's Comp lnsuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $2,256.28
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $227.32
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $848.41
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 101-45200-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH Q~R INSTALLMENT $195.88
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $5,603.21
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $810.13
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $1,165.62
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $1,721.83
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 281-45210-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH QTR INSTALLMENT $246.67
Invoice 102803 10/13/2003
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,424.00
Refer 102803 LUBE TECH, INCORPORATED
Current Period: October 2003
Wells Fargo Total $33.85
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MOBILE HYDRAULIC $111.72
Invoice 1005140 10/10/2003 PO 17944
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MOBILE HYDRAULIC $111.72
Invoice 1005140 10/10/2003 PO 17944
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MOBILE HYDRAULIC $111.72
Invoice 1005140 10/10/2003 PO 17944
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $335.16
Refer 102803 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 591869-B
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 596097 10/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 596876 10/21/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 596875 10/21/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 596874 10/21/1930
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 596873 10/21/2003
BEER $100.00
BEER $600.00
BEER $96.00
BEER $67,00
BEER $18.40
BEER $2,637.50
-3978-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 594474
Cash Payment
Invoice 594473
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 11
Current Period: October 2003
809-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $37.30
10/14/2003
609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $962.65
10/14/2003
10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,518.85
Refer 102803 MARLIN°S TRUCKING DELIVERY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-01-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $6.30
Invoice 13112 9/1/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-18-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $243.90
Invoice 13191 9/18/2003
Cash Payment E 609-4{)750-265 Freight 09-22-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $5.40
Invoice 13200 9/22/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-25-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $77.40
Invoice 13222 9/25/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 09-29-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $10.80
Invoice 13233 9/29/2003
TransacUon Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $343.80
Refer 102803 MATTHEWS, DAVE LANDSCAPING
Cash Payment E 401-45200-300 Professional Srvs
. nvoice 287413 10119/2003
ansaction Date 10/22/2003
LANGDON BAY SOD
Wells Fargo 10100
$1,365.00
Total $1,385.00
Refer 102803 MCCOMBSFRANKROOSASSOCI
Cash Payment
Invoice 45235
Cash Payment
Invoice 45236
Cash Payment
Invoice 45237
Cash Payment
Invoice 45238
Cash Payment
Invoice 45239
Cash Payment
invoice 45240
Cash Payment
invoice 45241
Cash Payment
Invoice 45242
Cash Payment
Invoice 45243
Cash Payment
Invoice 45244
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2OO3
E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64
10/112003
E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi
10/1/2003
G 101-22869 Landgon Woods, 00-35
10/1/2003
E 455-43255-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
09-03 PLANNING MISC ENGINEERING
Project 08901
09-03 ZONING MISC ENGINEERING
Project 08902
09-03 STREETS MISC ENGINEERING
Project 08903
09-03 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT
Project 12252
09-03 CTY RD 15 RELOCATION
Project 12533
09-03 LANGDON BAY
09-03 LANGDON WOODS
09-03 MCES LIFT STATION
09-03 SKATE PARK
Project 12754
Pr~ect12911
Project 13132
Project 13207
09-03 RETAINNIG WALL REPLACEMENT
Project 13215
Cash Payment
Invoice 45245
Payment
45246
~sh Payment
Invoice 45247
G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 09-03 WELL/PUMPHOUSE
10/112003 Project 13313
E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 09-03 LONGPRE BLDG DEMO
10/1/2003 Project 13314
E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 09-03 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY
10/1/2003 Project 13501
$2,884.00
$360.50
$412.00
$103.00
$4,082.60
$975.00
$51.50
$154.50
$1,286.50
$51,50
$1,609.50
$233,70
$390,30
-3979-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 45248
Cash Payment
Invoice 45249
Cash Payment
Invoice 45250
Cash Payment
Invoice 45251
Cash Payment
Invoice 45252
Cash Payment
Invoice 45253
Cash Payment
Invoice 45254
Cash Payment
Invoice 45255
Cash Payment
Invoice 45256
Cash Payment
Invoice 45257
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 12
Current Period: October 2003
E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
09-03 LOST LAKE/GREENWAY
Project 13566
09-03 STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT
Project 13677
09-03 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT
Project 13681
$16,841.40
$154.50
$51.50
G 101-22899 Pastuck Natural Homes #02- 09-03 PASTUCK 02-12 MINOR SUB
10/1/2003
G 101-22910 WCA Bartlett Violation
10/1/2003
E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs
10/1/2003
G 101-22931 2241 Southview Ln,03-10 W
10/1/2003
Project 13770
09-03 SAREMPA WETLAND
Project 13946
09-03 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Project 14121
09-03 2241 SOUTHVIEW 03-10
Project 14275
G 101-22950 4721 Aberdeen Rd. #03-34 S 09-03 4721 ABERDEEN 03-34
10/1/2003 Project 14459
G 101-22957 2420 Westedge #03-37 Horn 09-03 2420 WESTEDGE #03-37
10/1/2003 Project 14550
G 101-22958 2175 Noble Ln #03-40,#03-4 09-03 2175 NOBLE LANE #03-40
10/1/2003 Project 14556
10/22/2003 10100 Total
· $51.50
$360.50
$8,368.O0
$943.50
$309.00
$51.50
$103.00
Wells Fargo $39,829400
Refer 102803 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR
Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCl~ 11-03 WASTEWATER $48,806.33
Invoice 0000763476 10/9/2003
Transaction Date 10/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $48,806.33
Refer 102803 MICHAEL, GEOFF
Cash Payment E 101-42110-205 Computer Software
invoice 623 10/6/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003
Refer 102803 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTM
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 39963 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003
Refer 102803 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA
USB HUB 4-PORT $26.74
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26.74
INK JET LABELS $212.30
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $212.30
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals COLIFORM, MF - WATER $72.50
Invoice 186347 10/13/2003
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.50
Refer 102803 MINNESOTA, UNIVERSITY OF
Cash Payment E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training 11-19-03 REGISTRATION $96.67
Invoice 102803 10/22/2003 PO 17979
Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training 11-19-03 REGISTRATION $96.67
Invoice 102803 10/22/2003 PO 17979
Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 11-19-03 REGISTRATION $96.66
Invoice 102803 10122/2003 PO 17979
Transaction Date 10/22/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $290.00
Refer 102803 MOORE, CARLTON
-3980-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date
E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
10/1312003
E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
10/13/2003
E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
10/13/2003
10/13/2003
City of Mound
Payments
10123103 1:41 PM
Page 13
Current Period: October 2003
CALCULATOR $3.19
CALCULATOR $3.19
CALCULATOR $3.19
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9.57
Refer 102803 MORAN USA, LLC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS $373.00
Invoice 220454 10/2/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $373,00
Refer 102803 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 10-03 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE $1,487.50
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,487,50
Refer 102803 MOUND, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities 09-03 WATER/SEWER $22.25
Invoice 102803 10/17/2003
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.25
102803 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS
E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-03-03 BLACKTOP $226.22
Invoice 83592 9/4/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-05-03 BLACKTOP $141.49
Invoice 83781 9/8/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-08-03 BLACKTOP $121.64
Invoice 83932 9/10/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-10-03 BLACKTOP $223.00
Invoice 84054 9/12/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-11-0 BLACKTOP $122.03
Invoice 84130 9/15/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-15-03 BLACKTOP $141.50
Invoice 84184 9/16/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-17-03 BLACKTOP $548.05
invoice 84333 9/18/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-18-03 BLACKTOP $166.62
invoice 84427 9/19/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-19-03 BLACKTOP $82.29
Invoice 84504 9/22/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-23-03 BLACKTOP $60.82
Invoice 84652 9/24/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-25-03 BLACKTOP $263.52
Invoice 84801 9/26/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-26-03 BLACKTOP $60~82
Invoice 84879 9/29/2003
~sh Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-30-03 BLACKTOP $605.68
84994 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,763.68
Refer 102803 MUNTI-OGLE COMPANY, INCORP
-3981 -
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 14
Current Period: October 2003
E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $32,367.00
10/28/2003
10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32,367.00
Refer 102803 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 11-03 MUSIC SERVICE
Invoice A402215
Transaction Date 10/22/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 102803 NICCUM DOCKS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 281-45210-440 Other Contractual Servic REMOVE DOCK SECTIONS
Invoice 2367 10/17/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
....................
Refer 102803 NORTHE SUPP
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
invoice 3200244 10/9/2003
Transaction Date 10/.17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,006.81
Refer 102803 OHMAN, AXEL H., INCORPORATE
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $65,374.00
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65,374.00
Refer 102803 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO
Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 09-03 LOCATES $167.40
Invoice 3090551 9/30/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 09-03 LOCATES $167.40
Invoice 3090551 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $334.80
Refer 102803 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
$92.90
$92.90
$2,529.38
$2,529.38
WALL RECEPTACLE $1,006.81
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $375.63
Invoice 8018184 10/20/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,758.98
Invoice 8017495 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $838.00
Invoice 8016748 10/6/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,972.61
Refer 102803 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 49350826 10/16/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003
Refer 102803 PETTIBONE, P.F. AND COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 4849 9/15/2003 PO 17736
Transaction Date 10/20/2003
Refer 102803 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment
Invoice 998482
Cash Payment
Invoice 3286927
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
10/8/2003
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
10/2/2003
Wells Fargo
$143.60
MINUTES BOOKS
10100 Total $143.60
Wells Fargo
$124,40
WINE
CREDIT-WINE
10100 Total $124.40
$353.65
-$25.00
-3982-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 999900
Cash Payment
Invoice 999899
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 15
Current Period: October 2003
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,173.40
10/15/2003
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $128.35
10/1512003
10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,630.40
Refer 102803 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise Fo; R CIGARETTES $544.02
Invoice 28245 10/14/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $544.02
Refer 102803 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $109.75
Invoice 317182-00 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $468.27
Invoice 317671-00 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,152.52
Invoice 317181-00 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $608.52
Invoice 320327-00 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $383.92
10/15/2003
Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,563.80
Invoice 319901-00 t0/14/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,284.78
Refer 102803 RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $58,819.00
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $58,819.00
Refer 102803 SCHWAAB, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice P08206
Transaction Date 10/20/2003
Refer 102803 SCHWALBE, SUE
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
Transaction Date
HAND STAMP
Wells Fargo
$34,13
E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous
10/28/2003
10/21/2003
REIMBURSE MEETING EXPENSE
Wells Fargo 10100
10100 Total $34.13
$55.64
Total $55,64
Refer 102803 SHOREWOOD, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training 11-13-03 REGISTRATION SCHWALBE, SUE $45.00
Invoice 17976 PO 17976
Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training 11-13-03 REGISTRATION ROBERTS, $45.00
COLLETTE
Invoice 17976 PO 17976
Transaction Date 10/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $90,00
Refer 102803 SOLBREKK
ash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA SCANNER PARTS $3,044.91
voice 0004173-1N
Cash payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SCANNER PARTS $479.25
Invoice 0004219-1N 10/15/2003
-3983-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
Current Period: October 2003
Transaction Date 10/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 SOS PRINTING
Cash Payment E 101-42400-203 Printed Forms BUILDING PERMIT FORMS
Invoice 64956 10/9/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400.203 Printed Forms WATER PIPE CARDS
Invoice 64962 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42110-203 PHnted Forms LOGO ON DISK
Invoice 64885 9/3/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 16
Total $3,524.16
$246.55
$82.32
$10.12
Total $338.99
Refer 102803 SPECIALTY SYSTEMS, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $60,135.00
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60,135.00
Refer 102803 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INCORP
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR UNIT#10 $1,075.27
Invoice SX00928 10/9/2003 PO 17935
Transaction Date 10/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,075.27
Refer 102803........ '
STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INCOR
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $6,123.00
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,123,00
Refer 102803 STREICHER'S
Cash Payment
Invoice 388312.1
Cash Payment
Invoice 390551.1
Cash Payment
Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies
Invoice 387974.1 9/4/2004 PO 17849
E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms
9/5/2003 PO 17849
E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms
9/25/2003 PO 17849
E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 390551.2 9/25/2003 PO 17849
Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies
Invoice 388312.4 9/18/2003 PO 17849
Cash Payment
Invoice 386793.1
Cash Payment
Invoice 388074.1
Cash Payment
TRAINING AMMO
ELBOW PADS
ELBOW/KNEE PADS
TACTICAL VEST
KNEE PADS
E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA EQUIP NEW SQUAD
9/5/2003 PO 17838
E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SPEAKER
9/5/2003 PO 17847
E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous MAP LIGHT
Invoice 393790.0 10/3/2003 PO 17857
Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies
Invoice 387086.1 8/29/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies
Invoice 384626.1 8/18/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies
Invoice 381462.1B 8/28/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 394450.1 10/8/2003 PO 17859
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 395617.1 10/14/2003 PO 17946
CREDIT-GUN LOCK ASSEMBLY
IRRITANT AEROSOL
GUN LOCK ASSEMBLY
NIK TESTS
FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES
$489.90
$59.75
$63.80
$825.53
$39.90
$283.18
$159.70
$37.22
-$154.27
$110,33
$220.30
$276.31
$20.18
-3984-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Paymen[
Invoice 395617.1
Cash Payment
Invoice 395617.1
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 17
Current Perlod: October 2003
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES $20.18
10/14/2003 PO 17946
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES $20.19
10/14/2003 PO 17946
10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,472.20
Refer 102803 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #9TIRES
$68.17
$68.17
Invoice 10016637 9/26/2003 PO 17941
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #9 TIRES
Invoice 10016637 9/26/2003 PO 17941
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $136.34
Refer 102803 THORPEDISTRIBUTING OOMPAN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT--BEER -$0.80
Invoice 308457-B
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$6,017.96
Invoice 312071-B
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,227.50
Invoice 314161 10/22/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,691.75
nvoice 312740 10/8/2003
!ash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $68.00
Invoice 313401 10/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $291.00
Invoice 270781 10/20/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $32.65
Invoice 313400 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,868.05
Invoice 313399 10/15/2003
Cash Payment E 609-4-9750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $201.50
Invoice 27007,.3 10/13/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,688.75
Invoice 312740 10/8/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $68.90
Invoice 312739 10/8/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,119.34
Refer 102803 THURNBECKSTELELFABRICATIO
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFEATY BUILDING $19,699.00
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19,699.00
Refer 102803
TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $5.85
Invoice 429776 9/30/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $5.85
Invoice 429776 9/30/2003
~sh Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUs SUPPLIES $5.85
429776 9/30/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $6,05
Invoice 427439 8/31/2003
-3985-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 427439
Cash Payment
Invoice 427439
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 18
Current Period: October 2003
E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $6.05
8131/1930
E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $6.04
8/31/2003
10/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.69
Refer 102803 TRENCHERSPLUS, INCORPORAT
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AIR FILTEPJSHOP SUPPLIES
Invoice WT24240 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10114/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 102803 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
$251.88
Total $251.88
$38,000.00
Total $38,000.00
Refer 102803 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402810-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 400757-0 PO 17850
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 404006-0 PO 17850
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403136-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403136-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403136-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
HIGHLIGHTER PENS
INKJET CARTRIDGE
STAPLER,ETC
STAPLER,ETC
STAPLER,ETC
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
$10.05
$10.05
$10.05
$10.05
$10.05
$3.35
$3.35
$5.03
$5,O3
$58.03
$309,15
$18.98
$18.98
$18.99
$53.66
$53,66
$53,66
-3986-
CiTY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
10123103 1:41 PM
Page 19
Current Period: October 2003
Cash Payment E 10t-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404521-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 402702-0
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403840-0 PO 17961
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404909-0 PO 17963
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403743-0
ash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
404076-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404226-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
invoice 405148-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 405148-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 405148-0
ash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
403523-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
invoice 403523-0
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
FILE STAND, MOUSE
ALUMINUM HOLDER
INK JET CARTRIDGE
INK JET CARTRIDGE
CALCULATOR RIBBON
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
INKJET CARTRIDGE
INK JET CARTRIDGE
INK JET CARTRIDGE
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
$53.66
$53.66
$17.89
$17.89
$26.83
$26.84
$37.17
$15.45
$78.28
$100.10
$2.58
$2,56
$2.56
$2.56
$2.56
$2.56
$0,85'
$0,85
$1.28
$1.31
$20.30
$20.30
$20.31
$2.78
$2.78
-3987-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403523-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403523-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403523-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403523-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403523-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403523-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403523-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404532-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404532-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404532-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404532-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 101-43~100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 403584-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404045-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404045-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 404045-0
Transaction Date 10/22/2003
Refer 102803 VALLEY PA VING, INCORPORA TED
Cash Payment E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice REQUEST #3
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 pM
Page 20
Current Period: October 2003
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.78
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.78
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.78
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.93
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.93
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.39
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.36
BINDERS,ETC $42.78
BINDERS,ETC $42.78
BINDERS,ETC $42.79
COAT RACKS $46.67
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
$18.26
$18.26
$18.26
$18.25
$18.26
FILE,POST-ITS
FILE,POST-ITS
FILE,POST-ITS
Wells Fargo 10100
2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
$6,09
$6.09
$9.13
$9.15
$17.93
$17.93
$17.94
Total $1,529.56
$63,083.30
-3988-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 10/13/2003
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 2t
Current Period: October 2003
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63,083.30
Refer 102803 VEITANDCOMPANY, INCORPORA -
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 09-30-03 PUBLIC SAFETM BUILDING
Invoice 102803 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 10/2112003 Wells Fargo 10100
$71,026.O0
Total $71,026.00
Refer 102803 WAGERS BUSINESS SYSTEMS, IN
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies
invoice SDIN013903 9/29/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003
TOSHIBA FAX
Wells Fargo
10100
Refer 102803 WASH DEPOT
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 09-03 SQUAD WASHES
Invoice 2179 10/1/2003
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
$109.32
Total $109.32
$61.16
Total $61.16
Refer 102803 WELCH, BRIAN
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals
Invoice 17940 9/24/2003 PO 17940
Transaction Date 10/10/2003
Refer 102803 WESTONKAMECHANICAL
FREEZER $378.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $378.00
Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract SERVICE CALL BERGQUIST, ROGER $108.00
,ice 29813 10/14/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.00
Refer 102803 WHEELER'S PHOTOGRAPHY
Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous ON SITE PHOT SESSION $51.12
Invoice 1012-1 9/2012003 PO 17851
Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous ON SITE PHOT SESSION $358.41
Invoice 1012-2 10/12/2003 PO 17851
Transaction Date 10/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $409.53
Refer 102803 WlDMER OONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract REPLACED STAND PIPE $435.00
invoice 116 8/25/2003
Cash Payment E 675-49425-220 Repair/Maint Supply REPLACED STAND PIPE $0.00
Invoice 116
Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic DUG OUT ENDS ON POND $819.00
Invoice 143 10/6/2003
Transaction Date 10/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,254.00
Refer 102803 WINE MERCHANTS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $207.50
Invoice 82516 10/8/2003
Transaction Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total . $207.50
Refer 102803 WORLD CLASS WINES, INCORPO
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $165.00
nvoice 140893 10/6/2003
Date 10/23/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165.00
Refer 102803 XCEL ENERGY
-3989-
CiTY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 102803
City of Mound
Payments
10/23/03 1:41 PM
Page 22
Current Period: October 2003
E 455.46390-300 Professional Srvs OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND $2,500.00
CONVERSION
9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/21/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,500.00
~2003 ZEP MANU~bTURiNG COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CENTERPULLWIPERS $28.13
Invoice 57039238 9~30~2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CENTERPULL WIPERS $28.13
Invoice 57039238 9~30~2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CENTERPULL WIPERS $28.13
Invoice 57039238 9/30/2003
Transaction Date 10/20/2003
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
455 TIF 1-2
496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84.39
10100 Wells FaRo
$44,977.24
$9,398.54
$5,902.30
$95,626.98
$13,315.61
$745,907.07
$10,811.75
$53,355.01
$64,659.73
$260.33
$1,151.82
$1,045,366.38
Pre-Wdtten Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$1,045,366.38
$1,045,366.38
-3990-
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
CITY OF MOUND
PH: (952) 472~0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor Pat Meisel, City Council
FROM:
Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent
DATE:
October 13, 2003
Weiland Park Water Fountain
This is to inform you that the Park and Open Space Advisory Commission
unanimously voted to pay for the Weiland Park water fountain out of the Park
Dedication Fund at their October 9, 2003 meeting. A copy of the Minutes from that
meeting is also attached.
PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
October 9, 2003
Present:
Commissioners Susan Taylor, Ron Motyka, Gene Hostetler, Norm
Domholt (arrived late), Park Supervisor Jim Fnckler, Secretary
Denice Widmer, Public Works Director Carlton Moore
Absent/Excused:
Commissioner John Beise, City Council Representative Bob
Brown
Vice-Chair Derrick Hentz brought the August 14, 2003 to adjournment. Motion by
Motyka to adjourn the August 14, 2003. Second by Derrick. Motion
carried. Meeting of August 14, 2003 adjourned at 7:36pm
Chair Susan Taylor called the meeting
:37pm.
1. Ao~
9/11 c~rem0n¥,)
Motion b3
Motyka. No discussion. Motion
2. No agenda changes.
3. No citizens present.
by
Tabled
were reminded to bring
Park to that meeting.)
what the outcome of the parks tours
was to have each commissioner tour the
each commissioner to come prepared
the November meeting.
lar
Snowmobile Ordinance Review, Park Tour Results
REPORTS:
Skate Park:
Hostetler stated there have been delays due to volunteer schedules, but the
park is coming along. They are still planning to finish this fall and have the
dedication ceremonies in the spring of 2004.
Park Update:
Fackler gave a brief updates on both Rottlund/Langdon Bay Park and
Weiland Park.
Motion to adjourn by Derrick. Second by Hostetler. Motion carried. Meeting
adjourned at 8:00pm.
-3992-
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
CITY OF MOUND
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
October 24, 2003
TO:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM'
BONNIE RITTER
RE:
ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION - DAILEY'S PUB
Attached is the application submitted by James Dailey, of JDP, Inc., for an on-sale
intoxicating liquor license for Dailey's Pub.
Approval should be contingent upon receipt of all fees, applicable forms and certificates
of insurance.
The licensed premises in this case would include the patio adjacent to the pub.
Bonnie Ritter
t_Drinted on recvcled paper
3993-
Department Safety (form 9011 ~2AM)
Minnesota
of
Public
ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DMSION (AGED) (7/03)
444 Cedar Street, Suite 133, St. Paul, MN 55101-5133
Telephone 651-296-6979 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555
CERTIFICATION OF LIQUOR LICENSE OR APPLICATION FOR OPTIONAL 2 A.M. CLOSI~IG LICENSE
Licensees: Effective July 1, 2003, complete this form to apply for optional 2 A.M. closing license and make check payable to AGED for he
amount indicated below under 2 A.M. Section. You must have this form signed by your local city or count, licensing official.
Note: New Intoxicating Liquor Licensees must also purchase a $20 buyers card before establishments will be approved by AGED to receive
liquor shipments from wholesalers. Make check payable to: AGED
Cities and/or Counties: You are required to submit this signed form to certify the issuance of all city issued on sale intoxicating liquor
and/or Sunday liquor licenses, and all city ~ issued 3.2% malt liquor licenses. C~ ...... ~ ,,,~o,',~,o,, ~'i~l d,~'~,, f,,. 2 .^ ~.~2~.
Name of City or Ccun.~' Issuing License /~Otl_t06[ License Period From: To: -~e.~
License type: (check all that apply) On Sale Intoxicating~ 3.2% On Sale~, 3.2% Off Sale[2 Sunday Liquor~ 2 A.M. Option []
On sale License fee $ 3.2% On Sale License Fee $ 3.2% OffSale License Fee $ Sunday License Fee $.~
New License)g~, License Transfer [] Suspension/Revocation/Cancel []
Licensee Name: ~j,/)p ~i~,j~C. (Fonmer Licensee Name)
DOB
~.. (corporation, partnership, LLC, or Individual)
Trade Name /,,tttLt-~] tS p~§ Business Address ~1~1
Zip Code ~'5-'~t,q County. /4~'~*~ Home Address
Business Phone ri/~ ¥~ HOme Phone(~'~ t~ '/t-
Licensee's Federal Tax ID # '"11~,.. 3lo~
(Give Dates)
If licensee is a corporation, partnership, or LL~,]omplete the following for each partner/officer:
P~er/Officer Name (First Middle Last) · ~/tl~l/ Social Security # Address
Partner/Officer Name (First Middle Last) Address
/ O~ , ~ocial Security ~. _
70 ¥77 -Gq- '}q3t
Partner/Officer Name (First Middle Last) DOB Social Security # Address
Intoxicating Liquor Licensees must attach a certificate of Liquor Liability Insurance to this.form. (Does not apply if only
applying for Optional 2 AM license) The Insurance Certificate must contain all of the following:
1. ShoTM the exact Licensee name (corporation, partnership, LLC etc.) and business address as shown on the license.
2. Cove,[ gompletely the .license period set by the city/counW as shown on the license.
EYes ,2lNG During the past year has a summons been issued to the licensee under the Civil Liquor Liability Law.
Workers Compensation Insurance is also required by all licensees: Please complete the following:
Workers Compensation Insurance Co. Name 5i'/1{~- ~ ~u'~ofiL Policy # /q f~Llgl}
~ ~ ~" ~ m ~ ~,~ ' ........... m ....... , ....,,.,to t.':.c foIlo.."_'n~ *~,.n~__..
1. Fi~,t ~e above application completely and check 2 AM box above~
2. Report y~s 12 months on sale alcoholic beverage~ts by checl~ing one of the following:
[] ~_O?.in~receipts for alc~rages - ,200 2 AM license fee
[] Over$1~r alcoholic beverages - $500 2 AM license fee
[] D' ' ease fee
3. Does your liquor license issuing city/county/township allow the sale of alcoholic beverages until 2 AM? [] Yes
4. Make check payable to: Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division (AGED) for the amount indicated above that you have
checked. Mail check and this completed and signed certification/application form to the address above.
I certify that this license(s) has been approved in an official meeting by the governing body of the city/county and/or the city/county approves
the sale of alcoholic beverages until 2 AM.
City Clerk/County Auditor~ignature Date
Licensee Signature ~0~'~ ~-~ Date
(I certify that to the best of my knox~ledge I have answered the above questions truthfully and correctly.)
· * l~nclude as attachment, requ. Jrements as specified Jn City Code 800.10, Subd. 2. **
Copy of Code Sectlon 800.00 attached.
-3994-
Social Security #
Co~- lll,0OCity'
Licensee's MN T~ ID ¢G3 l[ ~
(To apply for ~ amber called 651-296-6181)
Ill
From:
Date:
Subject:
Kandis Hanson, City of Mound
Jim Prosser & Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates
June 17, 2003
MetroPlains Special Assessments
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
The City of Mound has previously approved a resolution assessing approximately $580,000 of public
improvements to the Mound Marketplace and Village By the Bay developments. The assessments
were to be paid over a ten year period. MetroPlains has requested that the repayment period be
extended to fifteen years for Mound Marketplace in order to permit reduced impact for lease costs,
The Village By The Bay assessments have been adjusted to more accurately reflect the projected
sales. The assessments for the residential project will be paid at the time the units are sold.
The Improvement Bonds recently sold for this project have been structured to reflect this schedule
and it is recommended that the resolution approving this refined repayment schedule be approved.
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
Jim Prosser, CIPFA
Executive Vice President/Director
3060 Centre Pointe Drive Phone: 651-697-8503 Fax: 651-697-8555
Rosevil. Le, MN 55113-1105 - 3995- Emafl.: jim~ehl, ers-inc.corn
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-1 '13
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2002
(MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION) - LEVY #15605
WHEREAS, a petition and waiver agreement dated February 12, 2002, by and between the City of
Mound (the "City") and Mound Marketplace, LLC, and The Village By the Bay Development, LLC
(collectively "Developer") was duly signed and executed; and
WHEREAS, this agreement addresses the handling of special assessments pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.00 and Laws 2001, Chapter 207, Section 12.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Mound, Minnesota:
Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is
hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the
proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of
10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January,
2003, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the
adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on
the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,2003. To each
subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with
interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he
may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made.
Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the next succeeding year.
The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county
auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be
collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Osmek and seconded by Councilmember
Brown.
The following voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Osmek & Meyer.
The following voted in the negative: None.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of November, 2002.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-3996-
ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2002
MOUND VISIONS 2"D ADDITION
PID
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
14-117-24
TOTAL
41 0062
41 0063
41 0064
41 0065
41 0066
41 0067
41 0068
41 0069
41 0070
41 0071
41 0072
41 0073
41 0074
41 0075
41 0076
DESCRIPTION
Lot 1 Block 1
Lot 1. Block 2
Lot 1. Block 3
Lot 1 Block4
Lot 1 Block 5
Lot 2 Block 5
Lot 1 Block 6
Lot 1 Block 7
Lot 1 Block 8
Lot 1 Block 9
Lot 1 Block 10
Lot 1 Block 11
Lot 1 Block 12
Lot 1 Block 13
Lot 1 Block 14
# OF UNITS
20
20
5
4
4
3
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
7
ASSESSMENT
$369.600.00
38 803.20
38 803.20
9 700.80
7 760.64
7 760.64
5 820.48
11 640.96
11 64O.96
11 640.96
11 640.96
7 760.64
7 760.64
7.760.64
13,581.12
$ 561,675.45
-3997-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 03-
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION) 2002 - LEVY #15605
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota
(City):
Section 1. Background: findings.
1.01. By Resolution No. 02-113 (Resolution)this Council adopted an assessment
roll Ievying certain special assessments (Assessments) against real property owned b y
Mound Marketplace LLC and the Village By The Bay Development LLC (collectively,
Developer).
1.02. The Assessments were levied pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
(Act) and a petition and waiver agreement by and between the City and Developer, dated
February 12, 2002 (Agreement) by which Developer as sole owner, among other things,
waived a ny a nd all objections t o t he a mount o f t he Assessments, and t he period over
which the Assessments were to be payable. The Assessments relate to Improvement
Project (Mound Visions 2nd Addition) 2002 - Levy #15605 (Project).
1.03. The Resolution provided that the Assessments were to be paid in equal
annual installments over a period of ten years at a rate of interest specified in the
Resolution.
1.04. Developers requested that the City modify the term of the Resolution to
provide that the Assessments be payable over a period of 15 years commencing as of
January 1 2003.
1.05. The Council recognizes that the first installment of the Assessments levied
by the Resolution is due and payable in 2003 in the amounts specified by the Resolution.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a revised assessment roll showing the a mounts oft he
remaining amounts to be assessed in the years 2004-2017.
1.06. It is found and determined that the best financial interests of the City, the
Developer and the Project that the Assessments be extended as provided in this
resolution.
DJK-232136vl
MU200-92
1
-3998-
Section 2. Approvals: Authorizations.
2.01. The revised assessment roll as set forth in Exhibit A is approved.
2.02. The clerk is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of the
resolution together with a copy of the Resolution to the Hennepin County Director of
Property Taxation for extension on the property tax records of the County for collection as
provided by the Act.
2.03. All other terms of the Resolution are unaffected by this resolution.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of October, 2003.
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
DJK-232136vl
MU200-92
2
-3999-
4444444 "444~44444444444~:
-4000-
-4001 -
5341 MayWood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Date: October 22, 2003
Re: Langdon Trails - Development Agreement
Summary. At its October 14, 2003 meeting, the City Council approved the final plat
application from KMB Development, LLC for Langdon Trails, a 13-unit major
subdivision of the property located at 2241 Southview Lane. Additionally, the City
Council also approved the Stormwater and Erosion Control Permit and an Early Start
Agreement to allow construction of three (3) new homes.
Development Agreement. A draft development agreement between the City of
Mound and KMB Development for the Langdon Trail project has been prepared by
Staff for review and action by the City Council.
General Comments. With regard to the proposed development agreement, City staff
offers the following preliminary comments:
The document is similar in content and form to agreements which were
prepared previously for the MetroPlains and Langdon Bay projects.
The exhibits referenced in the agreement have not been included so as to
minimize reproduction time and costs. Members of the City Council are
advised that the majority of the draft documents were included in the October
14, 2003 agenda packet and are now in the process of being signed by the
involved parties to allow for recording. Staff suggests that Council members
consider bringing their copy of the Oct. 14th agenda packet to the meeting.
The homeowner's association declaration was forwarded to Paula Callies of
Kennedy & Graven in the absence of City Attorney John Dean. According to
the final plat resolution, the homeowner's documents shall be subject to review
and approval by the City Attorney.
As required by City Code Chapter 330:35, Subd. 2, the title work for the
property was examined by the City Attorney.
-4002-
10.
The development agreement requires the submittal of a letter of credit in the
amount of 125% of the improvement costs which is estimated to be
$266,291.25. Based on discussions with the applicant's project manager, it is
City staff's understanding that the letter of credit for the project is forthcoming
and will be on file with the City prior to the commencement of any construction
activities.
The pre-construction meeting for the Langdon Trails project has been
scheduled for Tuesday, October 28, 2003 at 10:00 AM at City Hall.
The applicant is responsible for procurement of all public agency permits prior
to the commencement of construction activities.
The development agreement will be filed concurrently with the final plat by the
developer. Other documents to be recorded with the plat by the developer
include, but are not limited to, the Trail Easement, Wetland Declaration, and
Stormwater Maintenance Agreement. Evidence of recording of the documents
shall be provided by the developer to the City Clerk.
The development agreement requires the submittal of a $5000.00 escrow
deposit to cover costs incurred by the City as a result of the project including,
but not limited to, consultant and inspection costs. Additionally, the pre-
agreement fees (as estimated by Staff) must be paid prior to the release of the
Final Plat.
Tentatively, it is City staff's understanding that construction activities will begin
late next week.
· Page 2
-4003-
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
LANGDON TRAILS SUBDIVISION
AGREEMENT is dated this day of ., 2003, by and
between the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ("City"), and
KMB Development, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation (the
"Developer").
Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to
approve the subdivision of land and a plat of land to be known as Langdon
Trails, which land is legally described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
hereby made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject
Property").
Conditions of Plat ApProval. The City has approved the final plat and
development plan as contained in Resolution #03-91 attached in Exhibit
a
Final Plat Approval. The City may refuse to approve final plats of the
Subject Property if the Developer has breached this Contract and the
breach has not been remedied.
Effect of Subdivision Approval. For two (2) years from the date of this
Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official
controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot
layout or dedications of the approved preliminary plat unless required by
state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer.
-4004-
Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to
the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with
any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls,
platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this
Agreement.
Development Plans. The Subject Property shall be developed in
accordance with the following plans, original copies of which will be on file
with the City Engineer. If the plans vary from the written terms of this
Agreement, the written terms shall control. The development plans dated
October 7, 2003 are described as follows:
Site Plan / Cover Sheet (Sheet 1)
Composite Utility Plan (Sheet 2)
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain - Southview Court (Sheet 3)
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain - Langdon Trail (Sheet 4)
Street and Storm Sewer Plan - Southview Court (Sheet 5)
Street and Storm Sewer Plan - Langdon Trail (Sheet 6)
Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan (Sheet 7)
Details (Sheet 8)
Details (Sheet 9)
Installation by Developer. The Developer shall install or cause to be
installed and pay for the following:
B.
C.
D.
E.
Sanitary sewer
Water
Storm sewer
Streets
Trail to include 8-foot wide multi-purpose trail between Lots 11 and
12, Block 1, Langdon Trails to the Dakota Rail right-of-way.
Setting of lot and block monuments
Monumentation of the trail between Lots 11 and 12 at the Langdon
Trail right-of-way and at the Dakota Rail right-of-way.
Sign installation to identify delineated wetland edge and wetland
buffer
Surveying and staking of work required to be performed by the
Developer
Gas, electric, telephone and cable lines
Landscaping
Site grading
(Hereinafter referred to as the "Developer Improvements")
And other items as necessary to complete the development as stipulated
herein.
-4005-
Time of Performance.
The Developer shall install all Developer Improvements, enumerated in
Paragraph 6, which will serve the Subject Property, by October 31, 2004.
The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City.
If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the
security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the
extended completion date.
Public Infrastructure. The Develper shall install and pay for the following
improvements which shall be subject to acceptance by the City.
A. Sanitary Sewer
B. Water
C. Storm Sewer
D. Streets
E. Trail
(Hereinafter referred to as "Public Infrastructure Improvements")
Security for Cost of Public Infrastructure and Developer
Improvements. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this
Agreement, payment of the costs of all Developer Improvements and
construction of all Developer Improvements (as noted in Paragraph 8), the
Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of
credit from a bank ("security") for $266,291.25 which is 125% of the
estimated cost of the Developer Improvements. The amount of the
security was calculated as follows:
Improvements Cost
Grading $67,860.00
Sanitary Sewer $28,361.00
Watermain $33,841.00
Storms Sewer $22,282.00
Streets- Base Course $38,419.00
Streets - Wear Course $9,450.00
Street Signs $1,000.00
Pedestrian Trail $6,820.00
Landscaping $5,000.00
Total $213,033.00
-4006-
10.
11.
If actual bids on the above items are provided and approved by the City
Engineer, the total amount of the escrow guarantee can be reduced to
115% of the bid amount. The bank and form of the letter of credit or other
security shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. In the event
there is a change of status in the Developer's credit rating, the bank shall
notify the City 30 days prior to cancellation. The developer shall have 10
days to reinstate that letter of credit or it will be drawn down. The letter of
credit shall secure compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all
obligations of the Developer under it.
The City may draw down on the letter of credit without notice if the
obligations of the Developer have not been completed as required by this
Agreement. In the event of a default under this Development Agreement
by the Developer, the City shall furnish the Developer with written notice
by certified mail of Developer's default(s) under the terms of this
Development Agreement. If the Developer does not remove said
default(s) within two (2) weeks of receiving notice; the City may draw on
the letter of credit. With City approval the letter of credit may be reduced
from time to time as financial obligations are paid and developer installed
improvements completed to the City's requirements.
No work shall be commenced under this Agreement until the letter of
credit has been deposited with City.
Grading Plan/Site Grading. Site grading shall be completed by the
developer at its cost and approved by the City Engineer. The completion
of grading activities will need to be coordinated with the City in conjunction
with the installation of utilities. Developer shall furnish the City Engineer
with a certified as-built grading plan for the site grading work. If the
installation of utilities is occurring simultaneously to the grading, the utility
contractor shall have preference over the grading activities. No substantial
grading activities can be completed over installed utilities unless otherwise
protected. All improvements to the lots and the final grading shall comply
with the grading plan as submitted and shall be the responsibility of the
Developer.
License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees,
officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform
all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City during the
installation of Public Infrastructure Improvements.
-4007-
12,
Erosion Control. Prior to site grading, and before any utility construction
is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan,
shall be implemented, inspected and approved by the City. All areas
disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded
within 72 hours after the completion of the work in that area. Except as
otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be rye grass or
other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a temporary
ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched
and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention.
All basement and/or foundation excavation spoil piles shall be kept
completely off City right-of-way and shall be completely surrounded with
an approved erosion control silt fence. Approved erosion control fencing
shall be installed around the perimeter of each lot or at City approved
locations at the time of building permit issuance and remain in place until
the lot is seeded or sodded. A 20-foot opening will be allowed on each lot
for construction deliveries.
The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If
development does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule
or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take
such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. This right also
applies to the required erosion control for basement and/or foundation
excavation spoil piles. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in
advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not
affect the Developer's or City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the
Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for
such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of
credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed and no building
permits will be issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance
with the erosion control requirements.
13.
Plantinq and Seedinq. Prior to the City granting final approval and
acceptance of the public improvements, the Developer shall plant one (1)
two and one-half (2 ¼") inch caliper ball and burlapped autumn blaze
maple tree within the right-of-way in front of each lot. Plantings shall meet
Minnesota Nurserymen and Landscape Association Standards.
Maintenance (water, fertilizer, pruning) will be required until transfer of
title. The City reserves the right to approve or reject plantings based on
materials and workmanship. At the end of the warranty period the City
shall inspect the trees for their health and may reject those that
demonstrate poor health for reasons such as leaf die back, lack of
foliage/damage. Developer shall also sod the boulevards and trail
easement area at its own cost.
-4008-
14.
Clean up. The Developer shall clean streets of dirt and debris that has
resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns.
The City will inspect the site on a weekly basis and determine whether it is
necessary to take additional measures to clean dirt and debris from the
streets. After 24 hours verbal notice to the Developer, the City will
complete or contract to complete the clean up at the Developer's expense
in accordance with the procedures specified in Paragraph 12.
The Developer shall inspect and if necessary clean all catch basins,
sumps, and ponding areas of erosion/siltation and restore to the original
condition at the end of home construction within this development. All silt
fence and other erosion control should be removed following the
establishment of turf. These items are to be secured through the letter of
credit as is noted in Exhibit "C".
15.
Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and City acceptance of
the work and construction required by this Agreement, the public
improvements lying within public rights-of-way and easements shall
become City property without further notice or action.
16.
Warranty. The Developer warrants all work required to be performed by it
against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years
after its completion and acceptance by the City. All trees, grass and sod
shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free for two (2)
years after planting.
17. Responsibility for Costs.
Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all
costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development
of the Subject Property including, but not limited to, Soil and Water
Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and
inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and
acceptance of the subdivision and the plat, the preparation of this
Agreement, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in
monitoring and inspecting development of the Subject Property.
The Developer shall defend and hold the City and its officers and
employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for
damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat or
subdivision approval and development of the Subject Property.
The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and
employees for all costs, damages or expenses which the City may
pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's
fees.
-4009-
The Developer shall reimburse the City for pre-agreement fees
incurred for the preparation, review and enforcement of the
Development Agreement including, but not limited to, engineering,
planning and attorney's fees. The pre-agreement fees are
estimated to be $2356.00.' The fees shall be deposited with the
City at the time the Agreement is singed. If the fees exceed this
estimate, the developer shall pay the additional costs to the City
within 10 days of the request.
Do
Pursuant to City Code Section 330:145, Subd. 2, the Developer
submit an escrow deposit in the amount of $5000.00 with the City
at the time this Agreement is signed. In' the event the escrow
account falls below $1000.00, an additional escrow deposit in an
appropriate amount to be determined by the City shall be submitted
by the Developer.
Bo
The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for
obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days
after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt
development work and construction including, but not limited to, the
issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or
may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid
within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of nine (9)
percent per year.
18.
Developer understands that builders will be required to pay for the Subject
Property the fees, charges and assessments in effect at the time of
issuance of building permits. The rates for each of these items will be set
according to the current rate structure at the time the building permit is
received. The fees, charges, and assessments in effect as of this
agreement are:
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Availability Charges
per SAC unit (2003 current rate is $1275.00 and 2004 rate is
$1350.00).
B. Trunk Area Water Charge ($1500/unit*)
C. Trunk Area Sewer Charge ($1500/unit*)
D. Water Connection Charge per SAC unit ($240/SAC unit)
E. Sewer Connection charges per unit ($240/unit)
(*Units will be computed according to the Metropolitan Council
Residential Equivalency Unit Criteria. Credits will be made to the
-4010-
fees based on the credit formula applies by the Metropolitan
Council in calculating its SAC credits.)
19. Buildinq Permits. No occupancy permits shall be issued until:
A. The site grading is completed and approved by the City.
Bo
All public utilities are tested, approved by the City Engineer, and in
service.
C. All curbing is installed and backfilled.
D. The first lift of bituminous is in place and approved by the City.
E. All building permit fees are paid in full.
An early housing construction start may be allowed as provided by the
Early Start Agreement. A copy of the Early Start Agreement for the
Subject Property is on file in the Office of the Mound City Clerk.
The Developer, in executing this Agreement, assumes all liability and
costs for damage or delays, incurred by the City, in the construction of
public improvements, caused by the Developer, its employees,
contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers or agents. No occupancy
permits shall be issued until the public streets and utilities referred to in
Paragraph 8 are in and approved by the City, unless otherwise authorized
in writing by the City Engineer.
20.
Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any
of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option,
perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for
any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given
notice of the work in default, not less than 48 hours in advance. This
Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for
the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the
City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies,
levy the cost in whole or in part as a special assessment against the
Subject Property.
21. Miscellaneous.
The Developer represents to the City that the development of the
Subject Property, the subdivision and the plat comply with all city,
county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations
including, but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning
ordinances and environmental regulations. If the City determines
-4011 -
that the subdivision or the plat or the development of the Subject
Property does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to
allow construction or development work on the Subject Property
until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the
Developer shall cease work until there is compliance.
Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this
Agreement.
Co
Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be
grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third
parties.
If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or
phase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Agreement.
E°
If building permits are issued prior to the completion and
acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all
liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public
improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the
City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen,
employees, agents or third parties.
The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or
amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding,
amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties
and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's
failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall
not be a waiver or release.
Go
This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded
against the title to the property. The Developer shall take such
steps, including execution of amendments to this Agreement, as
are necessary to effect the recording hereof. After the Developer
has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the
Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver to the
Developer a release.
H°
Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is
cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy,
expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City,
at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and
every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so
existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such
-4012-
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a
waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right,
power or remedy.
The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the ,written
permission of the City Council.
Trail Easement. The trail easement attached to this agreement as Exhibit
"D", shall be filed and recorded by the Developer along with the filing of
the Final Plat.
Park Dedication Fees. The Developer shall pay park dedication fees in
the amount of $16,950.00 ($1304.00 per lot) in lieu of land dedication to
City of Mound prior to the release of the Final Plat. The City shall provide
a credit to the developer for the cost of trail installation, not to exceed
$5000.00 upon completion and inspection to the trail.
Wetland Declaration. The wetland declaration attached to this
agreement as Exhibit "E" shall be filed and recorded by the Developer
along with the filing of the Final Plat.
Stormwater Manaqement and Erosion Control Permit. City of Mound
Resolution No. 03-91 approving the Stormwater Management and Erosion
Control Permit for Langdon Trails is attached to this agreement as Exhibit
Stormwater Maintenance Aqreement. The stormwater maintenance
agreement attached to this agreement as Exhibit "G" shall be filed and
recorded by the Developer along with the filing of the Final Plat.
Homeowner's Association. The homeowner's documents attached as
Exhibit "G", are incorporated herein.
Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall
be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or
mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address:
KMB Development, LLC
ATTN: Kelle Bowe
2815 Casco Pointe Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to
the City Manager, or mailed to the City by registered mail in care of the
City Manager at the following address: City Manager, Mound City Hall,
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364.
-4013-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF MOUND
By: By:
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
KBM Development, LLC
By:
Kelle Bowe
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of
, 2003, by Pat Meisel, Mayor, and Kandis Hanson, City
Manager, of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of
the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day
of , 2003, by Kelle Bowe of KMB Development, LLC, a
Minnesota Limited Liability Corporation on behalf of the said corporation.
Notary Public
Drafted by:
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
-4014-
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Legal Description
Resolution 03-91 Approving Final Plat and Development
Plan
Letter of Credit
Trail Easement
Declaration - Wetlands
Resolution No. 03-92 Approving Stormwater Maintenance
and Erosion Control Permit(s)
Homeowner's Association Declaration Document
-4015-
PRESS RELEASE
MOTORIZED SCOOTERS
The Mound Police department has received several phone calls again this year,
concerning motorized scooters. These scooters are designed so that the operator stands
upright during its use, has a long extended handlebar, and a small gas or electric motor
near its rear wheel. The question asked is "Can my child drive or operate this scooter in
the city?" The simple answer is no, they may not.
By state statute and city ordinance, motorized scooters are considered motor vehicles. As
such, all applicable state statutes and city ordinances apply. That means the vehicle must
be licensed and carry insurance. The scooter must meet all safety requirements for lights,
brakes, horn, mufflers, bumpers, as well as eye protection for the operator. This also
means the operator must be licensed to operate the scooter.
It is also unlawful to operate these vehicles on any sidewalk, in any city park, or on the
shoulder of the road. No one can drive a car or motorcycle in the area designated as use
by pedestrians. The same applies to motorized scooters.
The best analogy: a motorized scooter is very similar to a go-cart. Go-carts cannot be
licensed, cannot be driven on the public roadways or the shoulder of the road, and cannot
be driven in public parks. It is only legal to operate a go-cart on private property.
Where can these motorized scooters be operated? On private property. You can operate
them on your own property or that of another if you first get permission from the property
owner to operate the motorized scooter. Remember, you must first get their permission.
The Mound Police Department is concerned for the safety and well being of all its
citizens and visitors to the city. State statutes and city ordinances were adopted to help
assure the safe travel of both pedestrians and the motorized public. Please help us to
keep Mound a safe place for everyone.
-4016-
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
MEMO
Date: October 20, 2003
To:
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
From:
Bruce Chamberlain
Project Landscape Architect
CC:
Carlton Moore, Public Works Director
John Cameron, MFRA, Project Engineer
Re~
Lost Lake Greenway Project.
Last week Tom Niccum with Minnetonka Portable Dredge and I boated the Lost Lake
Canal to check bottom depths. We found the bottom depths in almost all segments of the
canal to be at or near the original dredge depths.
The one exception, which needs redredging, is the area at the very northern end of the
canal just to the east of the former post office site where the water depth appears to be as
little as 2 feet. We think it is wise to redredge this small area because it can be done
under the existing project permits and because the dredging operation can be done from
land at a significant cost savings to any future dredging which will need to be done by
barge.
As a result, we have asked Minnetonka Portable Dredge and a couple of other dredging
contractors to submit quotes for the work to the greenway project's general contractor.
We anticipate that a change order request will be forthcoming.
We have also heard from other boaters who have explored the canal that there is a
shallow area just east of the center turn-around island. We probed the same area last
week and I believe what people are referring to is an area that is shallow by design and
regulated by project permits. Even though there are currently no cattails in a portion of
the "designed" center island, the dredged depth is very shallow. The shallow zone will
be marked off with danger buoys and it is anticipated that the cattails will slowly
revegetate this area over the years.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
M: OklOUNDI99-65~DOCMNT~dredge rnemo_l O-20-O3.doc
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401
Ph (612) 338.0800 Fx (612) 338.6838
-4017-
Engineering · Planning ° Surveying
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
October 23, 2003
TO:
Mound City Council
FROM:
John Cameron, City Engineer
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Municipal Well No. 8
Progress Update
MFRA #13313
Construction of Municipal Well No. 8, adjacent to the Evergreen Water Tower, was started on
September 15, 2003. The drilling process was completed, the well screen set, and the well casing has
been grouted. The screen manufacturer recommended that we use a full 18" diameter screen in lieu
of the designed 12" diameter with gravel pack. Enclosed for your approval is Change Order No. 2,
which shows a net deduct of $5 for furnishing the 18" diameter screen in lieu of a 12" diameter
screen and gravel pack.
The well was developed and pumping step tests were conducted on Tuesday, October 21, 2003 with
very good results. The final 24-hour test pumping is scheduled to start on Thursday morning at 8:00
a.m., the results of which can be verbally reported at your October 28, Council meeting. The original
design for this well was done anticipating around 1,200 gpm production. The indications from the
drilling crew and the tests conducted so far, show this well could produce considerably more than
the original design. Water samples will need to be tested after the final test pumping is completed,
which will tell us what we have for water quality.
We have prepared preliminary plans for the pump house but it was necessary to hold off with the
final design until completion of the well and determination of the capacity. When the final test
pumping is complete, the pump size can be determined and the plans finalized for bidding this
winter. Construction would then start early next spring, with completion mid summer.
s:'a~aain:WIou 13313 :\Correspondence~council 10-23
15050 23rd Avenue North . Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com
-4018-
Mound Interceptor Improvements Presentation
City of Mound
October 28, 2003
Aggenda:
Overview
Alignment
· Project Status
· Funding
· Schedule
· Questions and Answers
Summary:
The MCES is currently preparing a Facility Plan for improvements to the Mound
interceptor system. The study area contains two lift stations. One is located in downtown
Mound at the intersection of Belmont Lane and Shoreline Drive (L25). The second is
located at the old treatment works at the west end of Langdon Lake (L38). Alternatives
being considered include the following:
1) Upgrade of the two lift stations and reconstruction of a restriction along the
interceptor
2) Reconstruct L38 and construct approximately 7,500 feet of new deeper gravity sewer
to eliminate L25
Schedule
Hold Public Information
Meetings
Public Hearing
Council Adopts the Facility
Plan
Initiate Engineering Design
Construction Start
Substantial Completion
December 2003
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
Spring 2005
Summer2006
Engineering ° Planning ° Surveying
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 28, 2003
Mound City Council
John Cameron, City Engineer
City of Mound
Lost Lake Channel
MFRA #13566
Enclosed are two quotes for dredging and disposal to remove additional material, from the existing
channel on the north end. This area of the turnaround has either silted in or not enough material was
removed during the original project in 1998. ~
The Excavating Contractor on the Greenway project does not have the equipment to remove the
material from shore; therefore, we have obtained a quote from Minnetonka Portable Dredging. They
have estimated the work would take two days, and would cost approximately $5,000.00. The
disposal of the dredge material would be done by EAI, the Greenway Contractor, who has submitted
the attached quote in the amount of $4,000.00. The total cost would therefore be approximately
$9,000.00, depending on how much material is removed.
This work can be done under the current permits and with the inplace erosion and silt protection. If
we were to come back at a latei' date or need to do this dredging from a barge, the cost could easily
double. The contractors are ready to complete the work this week; therefore we are recommending
approval of this additional expense of approximately $9,000.00.
s:hnain:Xrnou13566~correspondence\citycouncill 0-28
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com
Menvlr°nmental assodates inc.
Prtmmry ~usine~s Address
770 North Highway 71 Suite 7
W!limar, l~nnesota 56201
Phone: 320-23 I-O4& I'
Fa~ 320-235-287 I
Emall: eaJC~e~-t~4.net
Quotation
To:
C~tr Of Mound
CJC) John C~me~on
(~uotation ~. One
Date: 10/27103
Customer ID:MoUnd
Quantity Item Units ! Descrlpfien Discount % Taxable Unit Price Tot~!
400 to $00 Cubic Ya~]s H~ul Away Muck $8,00/cy $4,000.00
Tax ! 0
Shipping I 0
HL~cellaneous I 0
Balance Due $4,000.00
Quotation valid for days.
Describe any condlrlons pertainln; to these prices and any additional terms of the agre~n~nt. You may want to InduCe confir;encies t~t will
the quotation.
To accept this quotation, sign here and return:
Organ/zation
0
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
CITY OF MOUND
Municipal Well No. 8
MFRA #13313
DEDUCT
Item 5 Furnish and install 12" Stainless Steel Wall Screen (DEDUCT)
Item 7 Furnish and Install Gravel Pack
Total Deduct
($ 13,175.00)
($ 1,875.00)
($ 15,050.00)
ADD
New Item # Furnish and install 18" T.S. Stainless Steel Screen
85 LF at $177.00/LF
Total Add
$ 15,045.00
$ 15,045.00
SUMMARY
TOTAL DEDUCT
TOTAL ADD
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER
DEDUCT
($ 15,050.00)
$ 15,045.00
($ 5.oo)
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
$ 89,575.00
$ 1,601.25
($ 5.oo)
$ 91,171.25
APPROVED:
ACCEPTED:
City of Mound
Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc.
BY:
DATE:
DATE:
RECOMMENDED:
MFRA
s:~nainAmou 13313~specs\chgordemo2 t
-4019-
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
CITY OF MOUND
Municipal Well No. 8
MFRA #13313
DEDUCT
Item 5 Furnish and install 12" Stainless Steel Wall Screen (DEDUCT)
Item 7 Furnish and Install Gravel Pack
Total Deduct
($ 13,175.00)
($ 1,875.00)
($ 15,050.00)
ADD
New Item # Furnish and install 18" T.S. Stainless Steel Screen
85 LF at $177.00/LF
Total Add
$ 15,045.00
$ 15,045.00
SUMMARY
TOTAL DEDUCT
TOTAL ADD
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER
DEDUCT
($ 15,050.00)
$ 15,045.00
($ 5.00)
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
$ 89,575.00
$ 1,601.25
($. 5.oo)
$ 91,171.25
APPROVED:
ACCEPTED:
City of Mound
Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc.
BY:
DATE:
DATE: l O '-' ~. -C} ~
RECOMMENDED:
IvIFRA
s:~nainSmou 13313~specs~chgordemo2
-4020-
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
CITY OF MOUND
Municipal Well No. 8
MFRA #13313
DEDUCT
Item 5 Furnish and install 12" Stainless Steel Wall Screen (DEDUCT)
Item 7 Furnish and Install Gravel Pack
Total Deduct
($ 13,175.00)
($ 1,875.00)
($ 15,050.00)
ADD
New Item # Furnish and install 18" T.S. Stainless Steel Screen
85 LF at $177.00/LF
Total Add
$ 15,045.00
$ 15,045.00
SUMMARY
TOTAL DEDUCT
TOTAL ADD
TOTAL THIS CHANGE ORDER
DEDUCT
($ 15,050.00)
$ 15,045.00
($ 5.00)
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
$ 89,575.00
$ 1,601.25
($. 5.00)
$ 91,171.25
APPROVED:
ACCEPTED:
City of Mound
BY:
DATE:
Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc.
DATE:
RECOMMENDED:
MFRA
s:Xmain:~-nou 13 313~specsXchgordemo2
-4021 -
October 24, 2003
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Mound City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Grove Lane CDS
Water Quality Study
MFRA #14603
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
As requested, we have investigated the concerns voiced by the residents of Grove Lane cul-de-sac
(CDS), about the quality of the water provided for their domestic use. The following are the results
of our investigation.
Background
The lots on Grove Lane CDS were platted as Langdon's Landing with the utilities and streets
constructed about 1983. The property was already served by a 4" City main, which was used to serve
the seven new lots in the new cul-de-sac. A small section of the 4" main was reconstructed and a
hydrant added at the back of the CDS. The two corner lots are served from the watermain in
Beachwood Road. The services for the three homes at 2600, 2608, and 2618 Grove Lane are
connected to the main, immediately in from of the hydrant. The other four services are connected in
the 90 feet of main in the CDS. We do not believe that this smaller 4" main is a major contribming
factor to the problem of water quality.
Problem
The attached letter explains the resident's concern about the water quality. We have not had any
water samples tested from any sources on this specific main; however, the City must provide
periodic samples to the Minnesota Health Department to insure that the City's supply meets the State
requirements. Some natural occurring minerals such as iron, calcium, manganese, etc. will meet
State drinking water standards; however, the water will not be the most desirable.
We believe that the higher concentration of sediment or residue in the water from this source is due
to a number of circumstances, unique to this CDS. First of all, the main is a dead end line, at an
-4022-
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Mound City Council
October 24, 2003
Page 2
elevation much lower than the other watermains in the area. This does not allow for a continuous
circulation of water through the pipe and thus prevent residue from settling in the line. Secondly, and
as previously mentioned, three services are connected just in front of the hydrant in the area where
water will stand inactive at times, allowing suspended material to settle. The remaining services are
also fairly close to the hydrant.
Solutions
The following are a couple of possible solutions to the problem:
This dead end main could be looped back to the main line in Beachwood Road. Upon very
preliminary investigation, it appears the only feasible route would be to follow the existing
sanitary sewer main, which parallels the lake shore for a short distance to the east and then
angles back south to Beachwood Road. This alternative would involve the installation of
approximately 800 feet of watermain and could be very expensive. The existing permanent
easement for the sanitary sewer may be sufficient, depending on where the main is located;
however, temporary construction easements would definitely be required.
A second, much lower cost alternative, would be to extend the watermain down a lot line
towards the lake, with a hydrant added at the end for periodic flushing. This would provide a
length of pipe well beyond the service connections for collection of the sediment and residue.
Recommendation
We are recommending that no corrective action be taken at this time. This area will be served
primarily by the new well on Evergreen Road when it is put in service next summer. As part of the
well installation, water samples need to be tested and these test results can be compared to previous
tests from other areas of the City. If this new water source appears to be of better quality, then we
would suggest waiting to see if there is still a problem after the new well goes on line. If corrective
action is still required, then cost estimates for the suggested solutions would be prepared and
presented to the City Council.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us.
Sincerely,
MFRA
John Cameron, City Engineer
JR:pry
Enclosures
s :knain:\Mou 14603 :\Correspondence\mayor 10-23
-4023-
August~ 2003
Mound City Administrator
Dear Sir or Madam;
This purpose of this letter is to inform you that the residents of Grove Lane are not satisfied ~ the
quality of the water we purchase from the city, Because of 'the appearance, .color and smell the Water
is Unappealing for ddnking water. The water stains our permanent fixtures such as our sinks, showers
and toilets, It is also ve~/damaging to appliances, coffee makers, china, pots and most of all clothes.
We are aware that the city has tried to address the situation over the past several years. The Water
currently runs from We fire hydrant at a Iow level constantly and is opened up on a periodic basis, It is
clear from the appearance of the drain and from our observations when the hydrant is opened that
there is a great deal of residue in this water, . .~:.~ '. ,.~,.(> ....- .
The city's current ?ffo..rts .~.m. to h.av..e no' effect on .,th, o.water that we u~e in ~r'l~0~e~] ' it continues to
be unsatJsfactory mr ~ intended daily uses. Desl~'ite payfng for city water, many of us are forced to
incur the additional expense of bottled drinking water and/or filter systems. When we have no choice
but to use the water, we find that it damages our home and possessions.
We are seeking an effective solution to this problem.
Your attention is appreciated,
Name Signature Address Phone,Number
-.,
~ 'd I~898'ON -4024-
,~,JOOV dOO~J )tNV~Jz[ S~BP~OOO~fl ~¥'¢8'8 SO0~
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
MEMORANDUM
To:
From
Date:
Re:
Honorable Mayor and City Counci
Sarah Smith
10/24/2003
Metropolitan Council - Housing and Demographic Information
The Metropolitan Council has forwarded the 2003 Final Housing Score and ALOHA for the City
of Mound which have been included for your review. Additionally, a copy of the Housing Profile
for the City of Mound has also been included.
The City's housing score is significam as it will be one of the factors considered in the evaluation
and ranking of grant applications including the Development Grant for the MHRD project. It is
important to note that the City's housing score increased fi.om (33) in 2002 to (62) for 2003.
The ALOHA is defined as the minimum amount of local expenditures used by a community to
assist in the development or preservation of affordable and life-cycle housing. Typically, the City's
ALOHA funds have been allocated to Indian Knoll Apartments.
City staff will provide additional comments regarding the housing and demographic information at
the meeting.
-4025-
Metropolitan Council
Building communities that work
October 20, 2003
Dear Local Official:
The 2003 housing performance score for your community is enclosed. The scores were de~ermined based
on several factors set forth in the Council's Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance.
Seventy percent of the score came from the survey you completed about housing activity in your
community during the past two years. It included information about:
local fiscal, regulatory, and housing rehabilitation initiatives to facilitate workfome housing
development and preservation
* the density of residential development
* the approval of affordable o? life-cycle housing that has not yet been developed
The other thirty percent of the score was determined from the following data about your community's
housing:
· the affordability of owned housing units (a combination of local government information about the
number of mobile homes, and homestead tax valuation data from the Minnesota Department of
Revenue)
· the diversification of housing (based on local housing permit data Council research staff gathers
annually from local governments)
· the number of affordable rental units (provided by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the.Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and local and county HRAs)
· the availability of housing in your community for persons with special needs (based on information
provided by the Minnesota Departments of Education, Corrections and Human Services)
The performance scores are intended to reflect both the amount of affordable and life£cycle housing
currently included in communities and their efforts to facilitate affordable and life-cycle housing
development and preservation. Scores range widely, reflecting the variety of metropolitan area
communities. The sparse' population and scattered housing locations of rural, unsewered communities
tend to result in lower scores, while the affordability and diversification of existing housing stock in
urban, sewered communities, combined with efforts to add and/or preserve such housing, yield higher
scores. .
As indicated in the Council's solicitation materials for funding this fall, the housing performance scores
will be one of the factors considered in the evaluation and rank/ng of applications for Council competitive
funding programs as follows:
· For the Tax Base Revitalization and Livable Communities Demonstration Accounts, the scores
represent nine percent of the total possible evaluation.
· For the Local Housing Incentives Account, when the housing score factor is considered, applications
for funding from communities with lower housing performance scores are given priority in order to
encourage and recognize local efforts to create affordable housing.
· For TEA-21 transportation funding, the performance scores account for eight percent of the total
possible application score.
www.raetrocouncil, org
230 East l~lfth Street * St. Paul, Minnesota 5510_ 4026-(65n 6o2-1ooo
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Metro Info Line 602-1888
· Fax 602-1550 * TrY 291-0904
The Council will be reexamining this prioritization tool in early 2004, and will consult with local
governments about the continued use of this performance measure.
If you have any questions or want to discuss your community's score, please call Guy Peterson', Housing
and Livable Communities staff, at 651-602-1418.
Sincerely,
Director, Housing and Livable Communities
Enclosures
-4027-
Final Housing Performance Score- 2003
Name of City/Township /~
Criteria - 100 points possible
4.
b.
10.
Total Score ~ ~-~
I,~ETC_MEARS~DATA~USERS~SF,,A.R. ED~IBR.AR~COMIVfl. JNDV~ETERSO~$~p Fcrforn-~mc=~O03 Final
-4028-
Preliminary Housing Performance Score- 2002
Corranunity _.P0!!~____C_Cgmmunity
~inneapolis 977Mahtomedi
St. Paul 94 Farmington ..............
New Hqpe _ 88 i Apple Valley
Coon Rapids 86 Anoka
;olumbia Hgts. 84 Mayer
South St. Paul 83 Inver Grove Hgts.
Robbinsdale 79 Arden Hills
Richfield 78 Hilltop
Oakdale 78 Orono
77 St. Paul Park
Chaska
Points .Communi[y i Points
44 .Wayzata ~ 2,1.
43. Empire Twp. 20
42 Gem Lake 20
411Sa:i~ge 2(5
4 l.BaTport . 20
4 ! ..~..a.~..Fran~.i~_c o.. TWP- "'i ........
41 Vadnais Hgts. ' 7 .........
40 Louisville Twp. , 19
Bumsville
St. Louis Park
Maple Grove
Roseville
Hopkins
Blaine '
Bloomington
Eden Prairie
New Brighton
Waconia
Crystal
Brooklyn Center
Cottage Grove
Fridley ·
Shoreview
Woodbury
White Bear Lake
Plymouth
Stillwater
Edina
77 Ramsey
75 Loretto
74 Prior Lake
74 Mound
73 Watertown
72 White Bear Twp.
72 Shakopee
69 Oak Grove
69 Hampton
68 Willemie
68 Lino Lakes
67 Cologne
67 Brooklyn Park
651Minnetonka
65 Hamburg ~
65
35 Centerville { 17
29 i Lakeland Shores & 14
-~9 ! Landf'a~i'i ........................ ~ ......~
29;Linwood Twp. -'"i ......... i-5
28 New Market 13
Norwood Young America 28 Birchwood , 13
~Champlin
Golden Valley
Long Lake
Maplewood
Mendota Hgts.
Osseo
Oak Park Hgts.
Jordan
62 Mounds View
60 North St. Paul
59 Newport
57 Victoria
56 St. Bonifacius
54 Falcon Hgts.
54 Little Canada
51 Forest Lake
50 Randolph
49 Waterford Twp.
49'lDayton:
48 !Lexington
Rosemount
47 [Spring Lake Park ,.
West St. Paul 471New Germany
Lauderdale 471Eagan
Belle Plaine 47 Excelsior
Circle Pines 46 Maple Plain
St. Francis 46 Rockford (pt.)
Chanhaisen 46 Bethel '-
Lakeville 45 East Bethel
Hastings 44 Hugo
St. Anthony
44iCastle Rock Twp.
28 Mendota 12
28 Elko 12
27 Carver ~ 11
27 Hancock Twp. ; 11
27 Lilydale
i ..........
2 ~ _C o.! u_m....b_u?_ .'!?~_p :_ .............. 1__0_
27 New Trier
2~-G~enfi~i .........
25 Lake Elmo
24 Miesville
.... 23.,..~C.!9m T _W.P.: ...........
...... _2 ~3I .n.d__eY e nde._n_c, e_ .........
23 Medina
23 Afton
; 10
...... _2_3 _.D_e~nn?k. T__wp:_..: ......... : ......... ~
22 Douglas Twp. ~ 8
22_ _ L.a_k e t o w_n_ _T_w_ p_. ...... ~ 7
22 Hampton Twp. , 7
21 Vermillion Twp. : 7
-4029-
Community Points
Tonka Bay 7
Blakeley Twp. ! 7
Benton Twp. 6
Chaska Twp. 6
Marshan Twp. 6
Ravenna Twp. 6
Coreoran 6
[-Ieleua Twp. 6
§and Creek Twp. 6
Spring Lake Twp. 6
Grey Cloud Twp. 6
Hollywood Twp. 5
Watertown TWP. 5
._Young America Twp. 5
Eureka Twp., ,,,
Nininger Twp. 5
Greenwood 5
Shorewood 5
Credit River Twp. 5
Marine on St. Croix 5
§t. Mary's Point 5
Bums Twp. 4
Camden Twp. 4
Dahlgren Twp. 4
Waconia,Twp. 4
Greenv~le Twp. 4
Medicine Lake 4
Stillwater TWP.__ 4
~e_ephaven 3
Hassan Twp. 3'
MinnetriSta 3
North Oaks 3
Cedar Lake Twp. 3
Sunfish Lake 2
Minnetqnka Beach 2
Woodland 2
New Market Twp. 2
DellwoOd 2
May TWP. 2
Pine Springs 2
West Lakeland TWP, 2
.... -4030-
Preliminary Housing Perfi>rmance Scores - 2001
Community Points
Minneapolis 94
Fridley 91,
New Hope 90
St. Paul 88
Coon Rapids 83
Roseville 81
Robbinsdale 81
So. St. Paul 77
Bloomington 76
Bumsville 75
Richfield 74
Chaska 73
Hopkins 73
St. Louis Park 73
New Brighton 72
Maple Grove 72
Oakdale 70
Hastings 68
Anoka 63
Golden. Valley 63
Columbia Heights 60
Oak Park HeiSts 60
White Bear Lake 60
Brooklyn Center 60
Pl)nnouth 60
Mounds View 59
!Brooklyn Park 59
Crystal 59
Eden Prairie 59
'Miunetonka 59
Cottage Grove 57
Edina 57
Woodbury 56
North St. Paul 56~
Blaine 55
Shoreview 55
Inver Grove Heigvhts 55
West St. Paul 50
Rosemount 49
Chanhassen 48
Maplewood 48
Watertown 45
Champlin 45
Hugo 44
St. Anthony 44
Mendota Heights 44
Farmington 43
Lakeville 43
Lauderdale 42
Prior Lake 41
Forest Lake Twp. 39
Falcon Heights 39
Mahtomedi 38
St. Paul Park 38
Shakopee 38
Eircle Pines 37
Forest Lake 36
Hilltop 35
Mayer 35
White Bear Twp...~ 35
Mound ~m. 34
Apple Valley ~' 32
Hamburg 31
Oak Grove 29
Ramsey 29
Norwood Young America 29
Willemie 29
Arden Hills 29
Excelsior 29
Wayzata 29
Bayport 28
Hampton 28
Randolph 28
St. Francis 27
Newport 27
Belle Plaine 27i
Osseo 27'
Empire Twp. 27:
Cologne 26
East Bethel 25
Lexington 25
Spring Lake Park 25
Orono 24
New Germany 23
Waconia 23
Maple Plain 23
Rockford 23
Waterford Twp. 23
Jordanq 22
Eagan :29_
Stillwater 21
Vermillion 21
Little Canada 20
Dayton 20
Long Lake 20
Lake St. Croix Beach 19
Loretto 19
Castle Rock Twp. 1~3
San Francisco Twp. 18
Lakeland 18
Savage 18
St. Lawrence TWP. 18
Marshan TWP. 18
Centerville 17
ARon 17
Belle Plaine Twp 17
Independence 17
Medina 17
Lino Lakes' ! 6
Vadnais Heights 16
GreenOeld 16
Greenvale Twp. 16
Hancock Twp. 15
Landfall 15
NewMarket 155
St. Bonifacius
Linwood Twp 14!
New Scandia Twp. 14
Rogers 14
Bethel 13
Ham Lake l 3
Carver 13
Spring Park 13
Coates 13
!Randolph Twp. 13
I Sciota TWP. 13
I Brichwood 12
Victoria 11
Jackson Twp. 11
Mendota 11
New Trier 11
Andover 10
Columbus Twp 10
Grant . 10
Elko 10
Lilydale 10
Meisville 10
Denmark TWP 9
Lake Elmo 9
Louisville TWP. 9
Gem Lake 9
Douglas Twp. 9
Hampton TWP. 9
Holl~vood Twp 8
Laketown Twp. 8
Baytown Twp. 7
Blakely Twp. 7
Corcoran 7
Ravenna Twp. 7
Camden Twp. 6
Chaska Twp. 6
Young America TWP. 6
Grey Cloud Twp. 6
Helena Twp. 6
Sand Creek Tx~?. 6
-4031 -
Spring Lake Twp. 6
Tonka Bay 6
Burns Twp 5
Benton Twp, 5
Greenwood 5
Eureka Twp. 5
Ninin~er Twp. 5
Dahl~ren Twp. 4
Waconia Tw~ 4
St. Mar)/'s Point 4
Credit River Twp. 4
Medicine Lake 4
Shorewood 4
Marine on the St. Croix 3
Cedar Lake 3
Hassan Twp 3
Lakeland Shores 21
May TWP. 2'
Stillwater TWP. 2
West Lakeland TWP. 2
NeW Market Twp. 2
North Oaks 2
Deephaven 2
Mirmetrista 2
Woodland 2
i Sunfish Lake 2
)ellwood l
Pine Spfin~s 1
Minnetonka Beach 1
-4032-
Metropolitan Council
Building communities that work
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 17, 2003
City Managers, Administrators, and Township Clerks
Elizabeth Ryan, Director of Housing and Livable Communities
Certification of 2002 and 2003 ALHOA (Expenditures in 2003 and 2004)
The Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (LCA) requires the Metropolitan Council to provide to every
local government in the seven-county metropolitan-area an Affordable and Life-Cycle Housing
Opportunities Amount (ALHOA), whether or not they participate in LCA's Local Housing Incentives
program.
The ALHOA is the minimum amount of local discretionary expenditure3 to assist the development or
· preservation of affordable and life-cycle housing required of each community participating in the LCA.
The ALHOA is not a grant from the LCA. The ALHOA is derived from the formula prescribed in the
law that includes market value, tax capacity and tax rates provided by the county assessor. In order to
continue to participate in the program, communities must expend at least 85 percent of their ALHOA
obligation for that year or distribute this amount to the LCA Local Housing Incentives Account or to
their city or county HRA, or unfortunately, withdraw from LCA participation.
Commmaities have some flexibility in determining which local expenditures fulfill their ALHOA
contribution. Examples include housing assistance, development or rehabilitation programs, and local ·
housing inspection and code enforcement, or local taxes to support a local or county HRA. · .
Enclosed are the ALHOA numbers for your community for expenditure in 2003 and 2004. You may
notice that the amount is higher, and in some cases, considerably higher for these years than it has been
in the past. This is the result of both the property tax law revisions passed in 2000 and the very
'significant rise in the market value of new homes built over the.past few years.
These increasing ALHOAs may have a deleterious affect on the capacity of some communities to ·
continue to participate in the LCA as the amount for some communities appears to be growing beyond
their ability to certify to such a level of expenditures or contributions to advance affordable and life-cycle
housing.
'To this end, the Metropolitan Council and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AM/VI) will
be collaborating to analyze the ALHOA requirement and determine how it should be revised, or
eliminated, in order to achieve more equitable results.
If you have any questions about your ALHOA for 2002 (to be spent in' 2003) or 2003 (to be spent in
2004) please call Guy Peterson of my staff at {551-602-1418.
Thank you for your consideration of this issue.
V:~LIBRARY~COMMUND!AR~an~2003[ 10170$_ah~a to
www. metrocouncil.org
Metro Info Line 602-1888
230 East Fifth Street · St. Paul, Minnesota 5510_ 4033- (65 ) 602-1000 · Ps 602-1550 · m 29 -0904
An Equat cJpportunuy Employer
-4034-
Metropolitan Council
Building communities that work
October 3, 2003
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City Of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd
Mound, MN 55364-1687
Dear Ms. Hanson:
The 2000 Census provides a wealth of demographic information about residents in the
seven-county Metropolitan Area. Toward the goal of better understanding regional
housing characteristics and housing markets, the Metropolitan Council staff has compiled
housing profiles for each community in the region. These profiles compare 1990 and
2000 Census housing and demographic data.
Attached is the housing profile for your community. We hope that you will find it useful
to have this collection of information pulled together in one place. We plan to provide
this same data for all communities in the Metropolitan Area on the Council's website -
www.rnetrocouncil.org - by the end of October.
If you have questions about the data, our research staff will be available to respond.
Please call Joel Nyhus at 651-602-1634 with any questions.
SinCerely,
Thomas H. Weaver
Regional Administrator
www.metrocouncil.org
Metro Info Line 602-1888
230 East Fifth Street * St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 · {651) 602-1000 · Fax 602-1550 · TrY 291-0904
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Data from 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census except as noted.
Table 1: Demographics
Demographic information 1990 2000 Change % change
Total population 9,634 9,435 -199 -2.1%
Number of households 3,710 3,982 272 7.3%
Pemons per household 2.60 2.37 -0.23 -8.8%
Number of families 2,611 2,559 -52 -2.0%
Persons per family 3.08 2.93 -0.15 -4.9%
Table 2: Population by age
1990 2000 Change
Age Number * % of total Number % of total Number Pement
Under 5 years 807. 8.4% 558 5.9% -249 -30.9%
5 to 9 732 ! 7.6% 639 6.8% -93 -12.7%
10 to 14 677 7.0% 665 7.0% -12 -1.8%
15 to 17 357 I 3.7% 390 4.1% 33 9.2%
18 to 21 392 4.1% 329 3.5% -63 -16.1%
22 to 24 337 I 3.5% 254 2.7% -83 -24.6%
25 to 34 2,082I 21.6% 1,416 15.0% -666 -32.0%
35 to 44 1,821 18.9% 1,947 20.6% 126 6.9%
45 to 54 1,039 10.8% 1,547 16.4% 508 48.9%
55 to 64 615 i 6.4% 645 9.0% 230 37.4%
65 to 74 466I 4.8% 477 5.1% 11 2.4%
75 to 64 248 2.6% 297 3.1% 49 19.8%
65 and older 61 0.6% 71 0.8% 10 16.4%
Total population 9,634 100.0% 9,435 100.0% -199 -2.1%
Table 3: Race/ethnicity by age, 2000
Black or Asian or Two or
African American Pacific Other more Hispanic
Age White American Indian Islander race races ! or Latino
Under 5 years 522 4 I 6 8 17 14
5 to 17 1,597 15 2 29 9 42 25
18 to 24 546 6 2 15 4 10 7
25 to 44 3,237 21 8 51 19 27 34
45 to 54 1,515 5 3 16 0 8 8
55 to 64 833 3 2 5 I I 1
65 to 74 467 5 0 2 1 2 1
75 and older 363 I 0 3 0 1 1
Total population 9,080 60 18 127 42 108 91
Metropolitan. Council
Mea~PnrkCentze, '2~Stm~t. St Pnut, Minnesota 55101-1626, (651)602-1000, Fm(602-1550, TTY 291-0904
MetroInfoLine602-lgg8 ·data. center~etc, ztate.mn.u; , Wwv~.metrocouncil. org
-4036-
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Page 2 of 8
Table 4: Households by type
Household type 1990 2000 Che, nge % Change
Family households 2,611 2,559 -52 -2.0%
Married couples 2,183 2,129 -54 -2.5%
- W'rth related children under age 18 1,134 945 -189 -16.7%
- No related children under age 18 1,049 1,184 135 12.9%
Other families 428 430 2 0.5%
Male householder, no wife present 130 136 6 4.6%
- With related children under age 18 63 90 27 42.9%
- No related children under age 18 67 46 -21 -31.3%
Female householder, no husband present 298 294 -4 -1.3%
- With related children under age 18 194 208 14 7.2%
- No related children under age 18 104 86 -18 -17.3%
Non-family households 1,099 1,423 324 29.5%
1-person 821 1,128 307 37.4%
2 or more persons 278 295 17 6.1%
Total 3,710 3,982 272 7.3%
Table 5:
Age of owner householder
Young adults (15-24 years)
Working-age population (25-64)
E der y (65 and older)
Household type by age of householder, 2000
Family household I 1-person household
i
207 I 150
Other non-family I
household Ot
IAge of renter householder
Young adults (15-24 years)
Working-age population (25-64)
Elderly (65 and older)
Family household
1-person household
22 45
225 265
22 132
Other non-family
household
27
3
Table 6: Tenure by age of householder
1990 2000 Change
Age of householder
Owners Renters Owners Renters Owners Renters
15-24 years 35 68 33 63 -2 -5
25-34 698 347 524 205 -174 -142
35-44 869 162 920 193 51 31
45-54 543 69 824 116 281 47
55-64 325 39 478 36 153 -3
65-74 238 71 248 54 10 · -17
75 and over 146 100 181 107 35 7
Total households 2,854 856 3,208 774 354 -82
-4037-
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Page 3 of 8
Table 7: Race/ethnlclty by tenure and age of householder, 2000
Owner-oCC'upied-- units Renter-occupied units
Age of householder Hispanic Hispanic
White Non-white or Latino White Non-white or Latino
15-24 years 33 0 0 60 3 2
25-34 509 15 3 191 14 3
35-44 903 17 7 185 8 1
45-54 812 12 2 106 10 3
55~64 474 4 I 34 2 0,
65-74 242 6 1 53 I 0
75 and over 178 3 0 106 1 0
Total households 3,151 57 14 735 39 9
Table 8: Occupied housing units by type and tenure
Type of housing and 1990 2000
units in structure Owners Rentem Ownem Renters
Single family, detached 2,713 235 2,911 163
Single family, attached 30 62 66 59
Duplexes 11 42 35 57
Buildings with 3 or 4 units 3 49 18 25
Buildings with 5 to 19 units 62 173 86 146
Buildings with 20 or more units 19 288 82 322
Mobile homes 10 2 12 0
Other units 6 5 0 0
Total occupied housing units 2,854 856 3p710 772
Table 9: Measures of crowding by tenure, 2000
Measures of crowding Owner households Renter households
1.0 pemon per room or fewer 3,178 751
More than 1.0 person per mom 32 21
Table 10: Value of owner-occupied units, county assessors' data
Value: Number of Number of
units in 2000. units in 2002
Under $50,000 276 139
$50,000-$74,999 238 142
$75,000-$99,999 473 172
$100,000-$124,999 948 381
$125,000-$149,999 599 706
$150,000-$174,999 286 676
$175,000-$199,999 .195 370
$200,000-$249,999 251 333
$250,000-$299,999 214 186
$300,000-$399,999 189 329
$400,000-$499,999 60 162
$500,000 or more 39 192
Total owner units: 3r768 3r788
Soume: County Assessors' database.
-4038-
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Page 4 of 8
Table 11: Value of owner-occupied units, 2000
Value of owner-occupied units: Number of units
Under $100,000 573
$100,000-$149,999 1,246
$150,000-$174,999 336
$175,000-$199,999 199
$200,000-$299,999 484
$300,000-$399,999 166
$400,000-$499,999 113
$500,000 or higher 93
Total owner units: 3,210
Table 12: Median value of owner-occupied Units
1990 value $87,300
1990 value in 2000 $'s $111,538
2000 value $140,300
Table 13: Monthly housing costs by mortgage status, 2000
Owner-occupied units with a mortgage
Monthly housing costs Owner units
Less than $300 0
$300-$399 25
$400-$499 57
$500-$599 95
$600-$699 69
$700-$799 140
$800-$899 269
$900-$999 251
$1,000-$1,249 547
$1,250-$1,499 360
$1,500 or more 669
Total 2,482
Owner-occupied units with no mortgage
Monthly housing costs Owner units
Less than $200 27
$200-$299 133
$300-$499 125
$500-$799 43
$800 or more 31
Total ''~ 359
Table 14: Median hOusing costs for owner-occupied units
Median monthly housing costs
by mortgage status 1990 1990 cost in 2000 $'s 2000
With a mortgage $806 $1,030 $1,153
Without a mortgage $206 $263 $321
Table 15: Gross monthly rent paid, 2000
Gross rent ' Number of units
Less than $200 81
$2OO-$299 16
$300-$399 25
$400-$499 117
$500-$599 162
$600-$699 155
$700-$799 54
$8OO-$899 46
$9O0-$999 59
$1,000-$1,249 18
$1,250 or mom 11
Table 16: Median gross rent
1990 $518
1990 in 2000 $'s $662
2000 $581
-4039-
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Page 5 of 8
Table 17: Gross rents paid by number of bedrooms, 2000
Rent categories Number of bedrooms
None One Two Three or more
With cash rent 53 417 213 61
Less than $200 28 53 0 0
$200-$299 7 9 0 0
$300-$499 18 113 11 0
$500-$749 0 212 111 13
$750-$999 0 23 73 44
$1,000 or more 0 7 18 4
No cash rent 0 0 16 12
Total 53 417 229 73
Table 18: Household Income by age of householder, 1999
Income Age of householder
Under 25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75 and over
Less than $10,000 14 7 3 30 7 24 40
$10,000-$14,999 6 0 28 14 10 17 60
$15,000-$19,999 0 4 35 7 34 31 32
$20,000-$24,999 24 49 40 31 0 39 53
$25,000-$29,999 17 32 29 23 5 16' 22
$30,000-$34,999 12 28 58 15 38 10 ~' 20
$35,000-$39,999 5 40 88 33 19 17 ' 8
$40,000-$44,999 0 58 42 18 4 26 27
$45,000-$49,999 10 53 37 26 28 24 12
$50,000-$59,999 5 65 145 91 67 45 0
$60,000-$74,999 6 151 233 159 94 15 0
$75,000-$99,999 6 124 252 178 77 27 0
$100,000-$124,999 0 20 83 107 19 26 0
$125,000-$149,999 0 22 . 42 57 46 0. 0
$150,000-$199,999 0 21 37 81 29 15 9
$200,000 or more 0 10 15 30 40 0 7
Total households 105 684 1,167 900 517 332 290
Table 19: Median household Income by age, 1999
Median
Age of householder household income
Under 25 years $28,068
25-34 $60,283
35-44 $66,161
45-54 $75,315
155-64 $64,934
55-74 $41,154
75 and older $21,912
~,11 households $60,671
-4040-
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Page 6 of 8
Table 20: Housing costs as a percent of household Income 2000
Households paying less than 30% Households paying 30% or more
1999 income of income for housing of income for housing
Owners Renters Owners Renters
Less than $10,000 0 51 11 54
$10,000-$19,999 28 58 86 51
$20,000-$34,999 132 114 165 65
$35,000-$49,999 263 128 107 9
$50,000-$74,999 728 104 157 0
$75,000-$99,999 528 46 37 0
$100,000 or more 578 61 11 0
Table 21: Households paying 35% or more of Income for housing costs, 2000
Households paying % of household income
Tenure for housing
35% - 39.9% 40% - 49.9% 50% or more
Owners 132 90 164
Renters 39 42 84
Table 22: Households paying 30% or more of income for houaing
by age of householder 2000
Age of householder Owner Rente~
Under 25 years 13 39
25-34 95 39
35-44 209 28
45-54 149 27
55-64 47 10
65-74 33 7
75 and older 28 29
Table 23: Poverty rates
Below poverty level in 1989 Below poverty level in 1999
Poverty rates
Number Percent Number Percent
Individuals 538 ' 5.6% 254 2.7%
Families 80 3.1% 22 0.9%
Households 197 5.3% 133 3.3%
Table 24: Pove~ ~ statUs by age
~ge group Persons below poverty level in 1989 Persons below poverty level in 1999
Number Percent Number Percent
Under 5 48 6.0% 8 1.4%
-1 25 14.5% 10 7.5%
1
58 6.7%! 8 1.0%
12-17 72 9.8% 27 3.5%
18-64 262 4.2% 158 2.5%
S5-74 30 6.4%' 31 6.7%
75 and over 43 14.0% 12 3.2%
-4041 -
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Page 7 of 8
Table 25: Poverty status by family type, 1999
Family type Number below Percent below
poverty level poverty level
Married-couple family 11 0.5%
- With related children under age 18 7 0.7%
- No related children under age 18 4 0.3%
Male householder, no wife I~resent 0 0.0%
- With related children under age 18 0 0.0%
- No related children under age 18 0 0.0%
Female householder, no husband present 11 4.0%
- With related children under age 18 11 6.0%
- No related children under age 18 0 0.0%
Table 26: Homeless population by county
Scott and
Year Anoka Dakota Hennepin Ramsay Carver Washington Total
2000 259 175 3,592 981 100 176 5,383
2002 289 238 3,659 1,429 53 103 5,824
Source: MN Dept. of Children, Families and Leamlng Quarterly Shelter Survey.
Table 27: Year structure was built
1999-
Year structure 1939 or 1940- 1950- 1960- 1970- 1980- 1990- 1995- March
was built earlier 1949 1959 1969 1979 1989 1994 1998 2000 Totals
Owner-occupied 615 224 421 403 819 442 140 136 10 3,210
Renter-occupied 49 62 69 170 342 76 4 0 0 772
Table 28: Residential permits 18sued, 1970 through 2001
Type of residential permits issued Number of units permitted in:
1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1994 1995-1999 2000 2001
Single family, detached 859 382 103 104 19 17
Townhouse ~, 0 33 0 46 0 4
Duplex 26 12 4 0 4 0
Multifamily 31 69 0 0 0 0
Total permits 916 496 107 150 23 21
~ource: Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey.
Table 29: Residential demolitions, 1990 through 2001
Type of unit demolished Number of demolitions
Single-family, detached 59
Other residential 0
Total 59
Source: Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey. '
-4042-
Community Housing Profiles for Mound
Page 8 of 8
Table 30: Job growth
. 1,849 1,709 -140 -7.6%
Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
(formerly Minnesota Department of Economic Security) and Metropolitan Council.
Table 31: Wage information, 2002
Wage group Jobs*
Jobs paying $5.15 or less/hr 26
Paying $5.16 to $11.04/hr 588
Paying $11.05 to $18.44/hr 470
Paying $18.45 to $29.49/hr 280
Paying $29.50 to $36.87/hr 72
Paying over $36.87/hr 109
Total Jobs In community 1,545
*Numbers may not add to total due to rounding.
Source: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
(formerly Minnesota Department of Economic Security) and Metropolitan Council.
-4043-
Data Sources:
Table # Data Sources
1 1990 Census: SF1 Database - Tables P1 - 3, P17A, H17A
2000 Census: SF1 Database - Tables P1, P15, P31, P33, H12
2 1990 Census: SF1 Database - Table Pll
2000 Census: SF1 Database - Table P12
3 2000 Census: SF1 Database - Tables P12a-i
4 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Tables P16, P19
2000 Census: SF1 Database - Table P18
5 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H19
6 1990 Census: SF1 Database - Table H12
2000 Census: SF1 Database - Table H16
7 2000 Census: SF1 Database - Tables H16a-i
8 1990 Census: SF1 Database - Table H43
2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H32
9 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H20
10 2000 & 2002 values from County Assessors Database
11 2000 Census: SF3 Database- Table H84
12 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Table H61A
2000 Census: SF3 Database - H76
13 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H90
14 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Table H52A
2000 Census: SF3 Database - H91
15 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H62
16 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Table H43A
2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H63
17 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H67
18 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table P55
19 2000 Census: SF3 Database- Table P56
20 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Tables H73, H97
21 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Tables H69, H94
22 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H96, H71
23 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Tables Pl17, P123, P127
2000 Census: SF3 Database - Tables P87, P90, P92
24 1990 Census: SF3 Database - Table P117
2000 Census: SF3 Database -Table P87
25 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table P90
26 MN Dept. of Children, Families and Learning; Quarterly Shelter survey
27 2000 Census: SF3 Database - Table H36
28 Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey
29 Metropolitan Council Annual Building Permit Survey
30 First quarter ES202 Covered Employment from Minn. Dept. of Employment and Economic
Development (formerly Minn. Dept. of Economic Security), and Metropolitan Council estimates.
31 Special tabulation from Minn. Dept. of Employment and Economic Development (formerly Minn.
Dept. of Economic Security), first quarter ES202 Covered Employment and Wages/Wage Detail
File and Metropolitan Council estimates.
-4044-
Definitions
Employment. For this document, employment is defined as the number of jobs within the city,
including part-time and full time jobs, based on data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and
Economic Development (MDEED) and Metropolitan Council estimates for the first quarter 2002. The total
number of jobs in a city may differ from final Covered Employment totals published by MDEED and
Metropolitan Council due to data processing differences.
Family. A family includes a householder and one or more other people living in the same household
who are related by birth, marriage or adoption.
Gross rent. The contract rent plus the estimated average monthly cost of utilities and fuels if these
are paid by the renter.
HispaniclLatino. Respondents who classify themselves as Hispanic or Latino can be of any race
because the Census records Hispanic or Latino as an ethnic category.
Homeless population. An estimate of the number of persons provided with temporary shelter and
the number turned away due to lack of space for each of the seven counties within the Twin Cities
metropolitan area, based on a survey conducted in May of each year.
Household. A household includes all of the people who occupy a housing unit. A housing unit is a
house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room occupied as separate living
quarters.
Household income. Includes the income of the householder and all other individuals 15 years old
and over in the household, whether they are related to the householder or not.
Householder. One person in the household is designated as the householder--it is usually someone
who owns, is buying or rents the unit. It can be any household member aged 15 or over.
Housing costs as a percentage of household income. A computed ratio of monthly
housing costs to monthly household income. Owners and renters who reported no income or a net loss
for 1999 are not included in these tables. Additionally, renters who do not pay cash rent are also not
included. The Department of Housing and Urban Development uses 30 percent, and in some instances
40 percent, as the upper limit households can pay for housing costs before they become unable to pay for
the other necessities of life, such as food and clothing.
Housing unit. A housing unit may be a house, apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms or a
single room intended for occupancy as a separate living quarters.
Married couple family. A family where the householder and his or her spouse live in the same
household.
Measure of crowding. The Census considers a housing unit to be crowded if it has more than one
person per room. For each unit, rooms include living rooms, dining rooms, kitchens, bedrooms, finished
recreation rooms, enclosed porches suitable for year-round use, and lodgers' rooms. Excluded are strip
or pullman kitchens, bathrooms, open porches, balconies, halls or foyers, half-rooms, utility rooms,
unfinished attics or basements, or other unfinished space used for storage. A partially divided room is a
separate room only if there is a partition from floor to ceiling, but not if the partition consists solely of
shelves or cabinets. This definition is open to much interpretation based on cultural or preferential
factors.
Median. The point where one half of the cases have values below that amount and the other half have
values above that amount.
Monthly housing costs. For owners: the sum of payments for mortgages, deeds of trust, contracts
to purchase, or similar debts on the property (including payments for the first mortgage, second
mortgage, home equity loans, and other junior mortgages; real estate taxes; fire, hazard, and flood
insurance on the property; utilities; and fuels. It also includes fees such as condominium fees and mobile
home site rent. For renters: the monthly housing cost is the same as their gross rent (see above).
-4045-
Non-family household. A householder living alone or with non-relatives only.
Non-white. All householders who indicated that their race was other than "white" or who indicated that
they were of two or more races.
One-person household. An occupied unit with only one inhabitant.
Other family. These are families where one spouse is not present, and are classified by the sex of
the householder. Male householder, no wife present, for instance, includes a household with a male
maintaining a family household without a spouse present.
Persons per family. The result of dividing the number of persons living in families by the number of
families.
Persons per household. The average number of persons living in households. To calculate this
number, the people living in group quarters are subtracted from the total population. The result figure is
the total number of persons in households. This number is divided by the total households to give
persons per household.
Poverty. Defined according to the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's) Statistical Policy
Directive No. 14. The Census Bureau uses a set of money income thresholds that vary by family size and
composition to determine who is poor. The poverty thresholds vary depending upon three criteria: size of
family, number of children, and, for 1- and 2-person families, age of the householder. If a family's total
income is less than the threshold, the family and every individual in it is considered poor. The poverty
thresholds do not vary geographically, but they are updated annually for inflation using the official
consumer price index. The official poverty definition counts money income before taxes and excludes
capital gains and the value of non-cash benefits (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps).
The thresholds used by the Census are shown in the table below. For a detailed discussion of poverty
definitions, please see U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, "Poverty in the United States:
1999." P-60-210.
Poverty Thresholds in 1999, by Size of Family and Number of Related Children Under 18 Years Old
(Dollars)
Related children under 18 years old
Size of family unit Weighted Eight
average None One Two Three Four Five Six Seven or
threshold more
One person (unrelated 8,501
individual)
Under 65 years old 8,667 8,667
65 years old and over 7,990 7,990
Two people 10,869
Householder under 65
years old 11,214 11,156 11,483
Householder 65 years 10,075 10,070 11,440
old and over
Three people 13,290 13,032 13,410 13,423
Four people 17,029 17,184 17,465 16,895 16,954
Five people 20,127 20,723 21,024 20,380 19,882 19,578
Six people 22,727 23,835 23,930 23,436 22,964 22,261 21,845
Seven people 25,912 27,425 27,596 27,006 26,595 25,828 24,934 23,953
Eight people 28,967 30,673 30,944 30,387 29,899 29,206 28,327 27,412 27,180
Nine people or more 34,417 36,897 37,076 36,583 36,169 35,489 34,554 33,708 33,499 32,208
· Family poverty status. Based on a comparison of the total family income with the poverty threshold
appropriate for that family's size and composition. If the total income of the family is less than the
appropriate threshold, then all members of the family are considered to be poor.
· Individual poverty status. Poverty status is initially determined at the family level and that status is then
applied to all family members. If a person is living in a single person household, or a non-family household
-4046-
(not living with anyone related by birth, marriage, or adoption), then the person's own income is compared to
his or her poverty threshold. Poverty status was determined for all people except institutionalized people,
people in military group quarters, people in college dormitories, and unrelated individuals under 15 years
old. These groups also were excluded from the numerator and denominator when calculating poverty rates.
They are considered neither "poor" nor "non-poor."
Household poverty status. Since poverty is defined at the family level and not the household level, the
poverty status of the household is determined by the poverty status of the householder. Households are
classified as poor when the total 1999 income of the householder's family is below the appropriate poverty
threshold, (For non-family householders, their own income is compared with the appropriate threshold.)
The income of people living in the household who are unrelated to the householder is not considered when
determining the poverty status of a household, nor does their presence affect the family size in determining
the appropriate threshold.
Race. The 1990 and 2000 Censuses asked the question about people's race differently. In the 1990
enumeration, respondents were asked to classify themselves in one racial category, even if they were of
two or more races. For 2000, respondents were able to report more completely, by indicating up to six
race groups. The change in questions makes comparisons between years difficult. In 2000, responses
were summarized into the following groups: black or African American, American Indian or Alaska native,
white, Asian, native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, some other race, or into a number of categories of
two or more races. Individual races are also tabulated, such as Chinese or Hmong within the Asian
classification. The categories in this table include persons who recorded one race only. The "two or
more races" category includes all persons who indicated more than one race.
Related children. Related children include the sons and daughters of the householder (including
natural-born, adopted, or stepchildren) and all other people under 18 years old, regardless of marital
status, in the household, who are related to the householder, except the spouse of the householder.
Foster children are not included since they are not related to the householder.
Residential demolitions. Residential demolitions are reported by communities in their response to
the Council's annual building permit survey. Demolition permits are not consistently required in all areas.
Some communities are able to accurately measure and report how many units are taken out of the
housing stock, others cannot, and some communities report only sporadically. Consequently, it is
expected that these totals are Iow.
Residential permits issued. The Council annually surveys all cities and townships in the region
about housing construction that occurred during the previous calendar year. Most communities send very
accurate, complete information. Townhouses are difficult to classify from permit reports. Communities
often rely on the designation made by the developer for this classification.
Single-family, attached units. Townhouse units most commonly fall into this definition.
Value of owner-occupied units, For Census tables, these values are self-enumerated in Census
2000. The question asks the respondent to estimate how much their property (house and lot, mobile
home and lot, or condominium unit) would sell for if it were for sale. The County Assessors' value is
provided by the County Assessor's office.
Wage Information, 2002. Earnings ranges shown represent minimum wage; and 30%, 50%, 80%,
and 100% of estimated 2002 median family income (U.S. HUD). Data is for first quarter 2002.
White-only. Householders who indicated "white" as their only race.
Year structure was built. Refers to when the building was first constructed, not when it was
remodeled, added to, or converted. The information is provided by residents of the housing unit in the
census, and thus may not be accurate, especially for rental properties and older homes.
-4047-
DATE:OCTOBER 15, 2003
TO'
KANDIS HANSON AND THE
CITY COUNCIL PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
FROM:
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE COMMITTEE
Jim Fackler, Collette Roberts, Shirley Hawks
Sue Schwalbe, Deb Grand, and Jill Norlander
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FINAL AGREEMENT
Please see attached highlighted responses.
Please update Administrative Code effective January 1, 2003.
Also please distribute to all affected employees.
Thank you,
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE COMMITTEE
Jim Fackler, Collette Roberts, Shirley Hawks
Sue Schwalbe, Deb Grand, and Jill Norlander.
-4048-
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
CITY OF MOUND
WER: www.cityofmound.corn
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
June 6,2003
TO:
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE COMMITTEE
Jim Fackler, Collette Roberts, Shirley Hawks,
Sue Schwalbe, Deb Grand and Jill Norlander.
FROM:
COUNCIL COMMITTEE
Kandis Hanson, Gino Businaro, Pat Meisel, Bob Brown
SUBJECT:
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE UPDATE
On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, the Council Committee for the Administrative Code
met and considered the outstanding proposals submitted by the Administrative
Code Committee. We apologize for the very large lag in time. Please excuse
US.
SICK LEAVE
Section 17.3 Change to read Sick leave may be used for an e, mployee's own
illness, physical examination, dental care, injury, maternity care, outpatient or
inpatient treatment for mental illness, alcoholism or drug' abuse. Employees may
also use sick leave for the serious illness, injury or other health care of
members in their immediate family. "Immediate family member" here is defined
as employee's mother, father, siblings, spouse, children, step-children,
grandchildren, grandparents, and spouse's mother., father, siblings, children,
grandparents and grandchildren.
Council Committee Response: Leave as is.
Employees' Committee Proposal:
(~- 4049
Section 17.3 Change to read Sick leave may be used for an employee's own
illness, physical examination, dental care, injury, maternity care, and outpatient
or inpatient treatment for mental illness, alcoholism or drug abuse. Employees
may also use sick leave for the serious illness injury or other health care of
members in their immediate family.
Council Committee Response: Add to the above-Absenoef0rtwo
days or less shall require the approval of the Department Head. Requests for
absences exceeding two days will be considered on a case-by-care basis and
will require the approval of the City Manager.
Employees' Committee Response: Council Committee Response should not be
added to Section 17.3.. This is addressed in Secti.o.n 17.4.
Council Committee reversed its response and will support the foflowing:
Section 17.3 Change to read: Sick leave may be used for an employee's own
illness, physical examination, dental care, injury, maternity care, outpatient or
inpatient treatment for mental illness, alcoholism or drug abuse. Employees may
also use sick leave for the serious illness, injury or other health care of
members in their immediate family. "Immediate family member" here is defined
as employee's mother, father, siblings, spouse, children, step-children,
grandchildren, grandparents, and spouse's mother, father, siblings, children,
grandparents and grandchildren.
AGREED. PLEASE UPDATE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
FLOATING HOLIDAY
The Administrative Code Committee recently became aware that employees
hired in 2002 were receiving a prorated floating holiday. This was changed
without consulting the Administrative Code Committee. We therefore request
this item return to the original status stating employees receive a full eight-hour
floating holiday indiscriminate of hire date.
Council Committee Response:
Section '15- Holidays
15. 5 The One ('1) Floating Hofiday will be prorated for employees who are hired
during the current calendar year and who qualify for this Holiday.
-4050-
Council Committee Response remains as above: Section ~ 5- Holidays
~5.5 The One (~) Floating Holiday will be prorated for employees who are hired
during the current calendar year and who qualify for this Holiday.
EMPLOYEE WELLNESS PROGRAM
(FORMERLY TITLED INCENTIVE PAY)
v/AGREED
The Council Committee appreciates the amount of thought and effort that went
into the proposal for an Employee Wellness Program. It is good to know that
City of Mound employees care about their personal health and wellness.
However, it is the opinion of the Council Committee that a great number of
avenues currently exist that encourage employee wellness. They include:
· Resolution supporting smoking cessation which rewards participants
· Offers for free and discounted registration at a local health and fitness
facilities
· Free use of exercise equipment at City Hall and the Fire Station
· Health insurance that covers prevention visits
· Dental insurance that covers prevention visits
· Initiation of local Weight Watchers chapter
· Health-related advice offered with paychecks
· Encouraged use of vacation time
· The option of shOrt-term disability insurance'
· Long-term disability insurance, provided by the City
The Committee fully recognizes that these do not constitute a ~ormal program
with incentives attached. It also recognizes that the employee group wishes for
a formal program which incents employees' involvement and rewards them for
it.
Finally the Council Committee also recognizes that the City benefits by healthy
employees in numerous ways. Benefits include: employees that come to work;
employees that are productive while at work because they are fit and healthy;
and health care costs that remain somewhat manageable.
However, it is the Council Committee's view that the economic times do not
allow for a formal program, since formal programs have their direct or indirect
-4051 -
costs. It is the stance of the Council Committee that during hard economic
times, it must be the priority of the employee to maintain or regain health, and
that those tools are currently available.
It is their Opinion, as well, that the employer can do some things that will
continue to further the health of employees and, with a show of employee
interest, is willing to proceed to carry out. Those include, but are not limited to:
· Workshops on health-related topics
· Health fairs that invite in local practitioners for education and screenings
(i.e., blood pressure tests, message, chiropractic, alternative approaches
to health, medical specialties--the options to be determined by the
interest of the group)
· Work-station chair messages
· Personality/phychological testing and results, for better mental health and
improving relationships
(Some of the above could present a minor cost to the employee and/or time
outside the normal workday.)
It is the thought of the Council Committee that the shows of interest and
attendance at these types of events will not only benefit the individuals, but
provide indicators to the City as to the commitment to healthy lifestyles. A
prolonged show of interest and involvement could result in a more formal
program when economic times improve.
A response from the Administrative Code Committee to these comments and
this proposal is encouraged. Closure on these issues and others previously
agree to can assure Council consideration of these policies within the next
month.
The Employee Committee appreciates the consideration of our proposal for an Employee
Wellness Program. We are disappointed that a formal wellness program will not be
implemented at this time, however, we agree with the Council Committee statement that
"the employer can do some things that will continue to further the health of employees."
Our committee is willing to work together to implement and carry these ideas Out i.e.
workshops on health-related topics, work-station chair massages, health fairs and
screenings etc. We do believe that employees are interested and participation will be
high.
We look forward to pooling our ideas and efforts with the Council Committee with the
shared goal of implementing a formal E~_ 4'052-Wellness Program in the future.
October 10, 2003
Pat Meisel - Mayor
Kandis Hanson - City Manager
Peter Meyer - Council Member
Bob Brown - Council Member
Mark Hanus - Council Member
David Osmek - Council Member
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mayor, City Manager and Council Members:
I am writing as a follow-up to my letter dated September 30, 2003, regarding the homecoming
parade that unbeknownst to us ended in our parking lot at Mound Marketplace. I have enclosed a
copy of a letter I received from Gene Zulk, the Superintendent of the Westonka School District, in
which he addresses the event. I also have spoken to Gene personally and I don't think that we will
have m~y problems in the future. I appreciate the City working with us on this in order to get a
satisfactory resolution for everyone.
Brian Pellowski
Mound Marketplace
Chief Manager
4969 Olson Memorial Hwy
Golden Valley
Minnesota
55422
Phone
763-545-1672
Fax
763-545~1697
E-mail
pbkinvest@aol.com
-4053-
Partners for Lifelong Learning
October 7, 2003
Brian Pellowski, Chief Manager
Mound MarketplaCe LLC
4969 Olson Memorial Hwy
Golden Valley, MN 55422
Dear Brian,
Thank you for taking time to talk with me last Friday. This letter is a follow-up to our
conversation. I would again like to formally apologize for the problems that our school
district homecoming parade presented to you, to every business in the Marketplace and to
every customer that may have been inconvenienced in any way.
As I shared with you on Friday, the parade was to have ended in the Bethel Church
parking lot, the very location that it ended last year. Unfortunately, there was a
communication breakdown. The parade leaders missed the turn to Bethel Church and
ended up on the street alongside the Pond Ice Arena with some parade participants in
your Marketplace parking area. Clearly, it was our fault and only our fault. I make no
excuses and certainly accept full responsibility and would again offer our most sincere
apology along with the promise of it never happening again.
Brian, as I shared in our phone conversation, I would be very willing to stop by each
business personally to apologize. We have only the highest regard and appreciation for
the Marketplace development and truly want to be viewed by each business owner in a
supportive and positive way. Marketplace is one of the truly outstanding things that has
happened in our community, we brag about it to staff and with new families all the time.
Brian, we will review all details regarding this year's parade as we plan. for next year.
We will also plan to have staff members in the Marketplace area and parking lot to help
with student supervision.
Brian, again thanks for your time. Please call me if there is anything else I can do. My
phone number is 952-491-8001.
Sincerely,
Superintendent
Independent School District z77
Educational Service Center. 5901 Sunnyfield Road East · Minnetrista MN 55364 · p: 952/491-8007 · f: 952/491-8012. www.westonka.kl2.mn.us
-4054-
September 30, 2003
Pat Meisel - Mayor
Kandis Hanson - City Manager
Peter Meyer - Council Member
Bob Brown- Council Member
Mark Hanus - Council Member
David Osmek - Council Member
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, ~MN 55364
Dear Mayor, City Manager and Council Members:
I am writing in regards to an incident that occurred on September 26, 2003 at our center known
as Mound Marketplace. A parade from the local high school took place that included fire
trucks & floats turning around and parking in our parking lot. Due to the congestion, our
customers were either blocked from getting into the parking lot or if they did make it in they
were unable to find anywhere to park.
In addition to this, there was trash left everywhere including spray paint cans, cans of silly
string and streamers. There was no supervision of these kids and our Property Manager ended
up breaking up fights and trying to stop the cars that were driving erratically through the lot.
We also had a fence kicked down and some sort of hair coloring sprayed on our building.
What's troubling about this is that our center is private property. It is not the property of the
city nor is it the property of the school. No one notified us that this was going to take place or
asked us for permission. If they had. permission would have been denied due to liability issues
and the disruption it caused our tenants and our customers.
Please consider this our formal notice that any and all expenses incurred for repairs and cleanup
will be sent to the city for reimbursement. In addition, should any event sponsored by the city
or the school disrupt our property in the future, we will hold that organization as well as their
council members responsible. I would urge you to take this situation as seriously as we do.
4969 Olson Memorial Hwy
Golden Valley Sincerely,
55422Minnesota ~.~ ~:~.~ ~~f
Phone Brian Pellowski
Chief Manager
763-545-1672
Mound Marketplace LLC
Fax
763-545-1697
E-mail
pbkinvest@aol.com
-4055-
Date Weather
10/1/2003 sunny,cool
10/2/2003 sunny,cool
10/3/2003 sunny, cool
10/4/2003 sunny,cool
10/5/2003
10/6/2003 sunny,cool
10/7/2003 sunny, cool
10/8/2003 sunny,cool
10/9/2003 sunny,cool
10/10/2003 sunny,cool
10/11/2003 rain
10/12/2003
10/13/2003 sunny,cool
10/14/2003 sunny,cool
10/15/2003 sunny,cool
10/16/2003 sunny,cool
10/17/2003 sunny,warr
10/18/2003 sunny
10/19/2003
10/20/2003 sunny
10/21/2003 cldy/cool
10/22/2003
10/23/2003
10/24/2003
10/25/2003
10/26/2003
10/27/2003
10/28/2003
10/29/2003
10/30/2003
10/31/2003
Totals
dsg
Harbor Wine & Spirits Oct. 2003
Cust 03 Cust 02 Varience 2003
242 298 -56 3255.11
275 281 -6 5191.11
428 307 121 7536.78
526 477 49 9929.91
574 -574
249 249 3043.11
285 288 -3 4272.75
277 299 -22 4052.87
274 323 -49 4815.35
472 327 145 7826.51
481 629 -148 10192.09
542 -542
244 244 3370.08
238 282 -44 3882.48
241 253 -12 4637.66
274 293 -19 4782.41
413 310 103 8282.75
548 463 85 10856.96
512 -512
276 276 4200.63
216 287 -71 3349.32
255 -255
279 -279
322 -322
504 -504
634 -634
0
285 -285
277 -277
253 -253
374 -374
5959 9928 -3969 103477.9
2002
3801.58
3893.25
3865.32
8184.68
9277.9
3210.99
4116.64
4143.4
4440.54
10156.68
8951.73
3741.65
3569.61
3588.16
4294.17
6742.8
8213.5
3338.87
3237.22
3631.54
4727.68
7769.21
10913.42
3923.3
3443.93
3327.08
5753.49
144258.3
Difference+/.
-546.47
1297.86
3671.46
1745.23
-9277.9
3043.11
1061.76
-63.77
671.95
3385.97
35.41
-8951.73
3370.08
140.83
1068.05
1194.25
3988.58
4114.16
-8213.5
4200.63
10.45
-3237.22
-3631.54
-4727.68
-7769.21
-10913.42
0
-3923.3
-3443.93
-3327.08
-5753.49
-40780.46
-4056-
Harbor U;ine & Spirits
135 Commerre Blud
J. Moreau & Fils Vouvray.'....$7.99
Laurel Glen
Silverado
Chardonna
"Reds"......$7.99
Carmen
All Types!
$14,49-'- . , $6.99
· Special :lng .Sail°r Jerry
R,ch & Rare on all
t.75 Ltr
Nouveau Beaujolais!Spiced Rum 750ml
$12.49 , $t3,99
Dutch Cream
$9,99
Heineken & Amstel
12PackCans
$11,49
Mark Your
Calendars!
12pk Sampler
$9,49
Pilsner Urquell
12 Pack Bottles
$12,49
-4057-
FALL 2003
A PUBLICATION OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA ,ASSOCIATION
The Loss of Civility on Lake Minnetonka
Dick Osgood, Executive Director
The use of our lake is
changing, some think
for the worst. It seems
these changes have
snuck up on us m
recreational use sur-
veys show no chang-
ing in boat numbers
over the past several
decades. However,
those who use the
lake regularly have a
different sense. In the
words of the mayors
of lake cities, there has been a loss of
civility on our lake.
These changes did not happen sud-
denly. Lake Minnetonka is big, com-
plex and very popular. Lake
Minnetonka has always been the most
heavily-used lake in Minnesota. Thus,
detecting changes in the impact of
boat use is a challenge. Yet, we know:
· The numbers of boats have not
changed, but boat size and power
have increased.
· The impact of personal watercraft
has changed simply because it did
not exist a short time ago.
· The nature of watercraft use has
changed - fewer fishing boats, more
power boats.
· The lakeshoreis becoming more
crowded and there is a demand for
more facilities.
boaters and provide a
credible inspection.
However, we need to
ramp up and that will
be costly.
Add to this the fact that the water
patrol, which does a wonderful job in
keeping Lake Minnetonka safe, is
threatened with budget cuts. The
LMA thinks there should be more
water patrol on Lake Minnetonka,
not less.
The LMA thinks there is a need for
more controls on lakeshore develop-
ment. The lakeshore is becoming too
cluttered. The LMA stands ready to
participate in the LMCD's boat densi-
ty taSk force, which was initiated last
March, but has not yet reconvened to
conduct the study.
The LMA is concerned about the
influx of exotic species. Zebra mussels
and about a dozen other exotic
species threaten our lake and there is
no effective program to protect Lake
Minnetonka. The pilot inspection pro-
gram (see article inside) has shown
this to be an effective way to educate
We recognize there is
a need for remedies to
these concerns, how-
ever, this is another
problem - where will
the money come from
to pay for these servic-
es. We are frustrated
that Lake Minnetonka is such a valu-
able resource, yet there is too little
invested in preserving and protecting
our lake.
More money needs to be spent to pro-
tect and improve the lake for recre-
ation, water quality and overall health
and safety!
The LMA will be working to identify
a source for this money, help to secure
it and work with the cities, counties
and agencies to wisely spend it for
expanded efforts to preserve its value.
The credibility and strength of our
advocacy in these efforts increases
with numbers. Your support of the
LMA is essential to our success.
'Please, if you are not a member of the
LMA, join today. If you are a mem-
ber, please consider making an addi-
tional contribution. Thanks.
*-4058-
//
No Zebra Mussels in
Lake
has evaded infes-
tati0n by zebra
mussel for anoth-
er year. The LMA
completed its
annual study of the lake and found no
evidence of the exotic species - at least,
not yet. During the June and July testing
period, the LMA collected water sam-
ples that were analyzed for zebra mussel
vellgers, the microscopic immature form
of zebra mussel. The sampling is
designed to find zebra mussels if they are
in the lake. Finding none, we are confi-
dent this gives Lake Minnetonka a clean
bill of health regarding zebra mussel.
The LMA remains concerned because
once the mussels get into our lake, they
will cause tremendous damage and are
impossible to eliminate.
The LMA also collected samples from
four lakes that are tributary to Lake
The LMA is concerned if
mussels are found in tributary
lakes because they (and the zebra mus-
sels) flow into Lake Minnetonka. The
four lakes where samples were collected
were: Christmas, Long, Parley and
Virginia. No zebra mussels were found
in any of these lakes.
The Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District's Save-the-Lake Fund provides
the financial support for the laboratory
analysis.
The LMA and LMCD have been work-
lng cooperatively to keep zebra mussels
out of Lake Minnetonka. For additional
information, see the article on the access
inspections.
The LMA has established the 'Exotic
"ON THE LAKE"
is a quarterly publication of the
Lake Minnetonka Association,
P.O. Box 248, Excelsior, MN 55331
ISSUE 2003:3 · OCTOBER 2003
HOW TO CONTACT THE LMA
Phone Number: ............. (952) 4704449
E-Mail: ........... Minnetonka@Mnlakes.org
Web Site: ...... www. mnlakes.org/Minnetonka
Board. Wayne Nelson
The LMA needs the support of lakeshore owners and lake-related businesses
now, more than evez As you will see from the articles in this newsletter, we are
confronting threats to our beautiful lake on several fronts. There is the threat
of exotic species introductions, the threat of overcrowding and inappropriate
use on the lake, and the threat of lake shore overdevelopment. We look at this
as a 'glass half (-ull' type of problem - after all, if Lake Minnetonka was not so
attractive in so many ways, these threats would be so large. By the same
token, there needs to be greater public investment in protecting this resource.
The LMA'is an active advocate for protecting our lake. We must have wide
participation from our members. To be an effective voice, we must have your
support. Please read this newsletter, visit our webs site, or contact our office to
learn more. Then, please join the LMA. Thanks.
Species Fund' to help pay for programs
and activities ro keep zebra mussels and
other exotic invaders out of our lake.
Access Inspections -
Now What?
The 2003 pilot access inspection pro-
gram has been completed. The LMA,
the LMCD and the Legacy Foundation
contributed $18,000 to pay for 1,500
hours of access inspections at the four
busiest sites on Lake Minnetonka. The
inspectors were provided through the
MN DNR's watercraft inspector pro-
gram from mid-May through Labor
Day weekend.
The inspection program has been a suc-
cess in that the inspectors are well
trained and well-receive by boaters. The
inspectors provide a credible inspect/on
along with a valuable eduCational mes-
sage.
The LMA believes we need to institute
access inspections as a regular feature on
Lake Minnetonka. This is needed
beCause zebra mussels are a real threat
to our lake and other exotic species are
headed our way. Unfortunately, we will
probably never be immune from these
pests.
A comprehensive, lake-wide inspection
program is a substantial increase in
effort and expenditure from this sum-
mer's pilot program It ie qO longer prac-
-4059-
tical or feasible to fund a regular pro- .
gram by raising funds piecemeal through
individuals and other sponsors. The
LMA believes this program ought to be
administered locally and funded region-
ally. The LMCD is the logical agency to
operate the access inspection program.
The LMA has yet to explore this formal-
ly with the LMCD and we will be work-
lng with the LMCD in the upcoming
months.
Funding for a comprehensive inspection
program will also be a significant con-
sideration. While no specific plan has
been drafted, a back-of-the-envelop esti-
mate of program costs quickly
approaches $100,000 per year: The
LMA will be an advocate for this impor-
tant effort to protect our beautiful lake.
Fourth of July
Fireworks ..... '
Goal Short..
Thanks again to those
who supported the Fourth of July
Fireworks sponsored by the Excelsior
Area Chamber of Commerce. The dis-
play was wonderful and was enjoyed by
thousands on a beautiful Fourth of July
evening. Unfortunately, we fell short of
our pledge. Please consider s.ending a
mx-deductible check to the LMA so we
can reimburse the Excelsior Chamber so
they can balance their books.
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL -- CONTRIBUTIONS ARE NEEDED!
Thank you to LMA members who have renewed their membership. Your dues help support the important WOrk of the LMA.
YVI- IVI-L.I./ IVIL/fllI- ~1~1.,.~.,)1 ILII~I. IJYVI~II.I 1~,7 I't~,.~ IVlI-IVII~I,..I I~.1. VVILIILlUl ~tr~l~r~t LI,r'zDC; p 0~
LII ,~(JI. II~I.JIL~ LII(~ I.,IVI/"i DCIIIIIIJL I~III[IIIL]~ L(J I'
vide a voice for ~the betterment of our beautiful lake.
Membership categories are:
Basic Member ......................... $50
Sustaining Member .................... $150
Captain .............................. $500
Business Member ...................... $250
*About covers the costs of basic member services
*Provides resources to sustain LMA's activities
*The highest membership level
*Lake-related businesses supporting the LMA
Support the Exotic Species Fund. The ESF allows the LMA to aggressively'prevent the spread of new exotic species into
Lake Minnetonka and he/ps to better control those already in Lake Minnetonka.
Make a contribution. Additional contributions help strengthen the LMA.
THANK YOU,
CONTRIBUTORS
SINCE LAST LMA
NEWSLETTERI
Nell & Antoinette Riley
Rosemary & Gerald Snyder
D.D, Spatz
*blank envelope submitted
CAPTAINS ($500 +)
BASIC (UP TO $149)
Gary Holmes Gene & Lois Adams
George & Sally Pillsbury Harry &; LeeAnne Allen
Lachlan & Martha Reed Karen &: Ed Baker
George & Teri Bloom
SUSTAINING ($150 - $499) Michael & Sally Bosanko
Paul & Peggy Buckman
H.M. Baskerville J[ Paul &: Juhe Buflingame
Jim & Lynn Blakeway Kelly & Mary Bosworth
Bill &Bea Beddor Ben &Joanne Case
John & Cheryl Dale Gerry Clark
Dave & Holly Eiss Wayne Clymer
Bill &: Kay Erickson Dave & Carol Cole
Alfred & Ingrid Lenz Harrison Lawrence DeWitt
Woody Jewett Andy Dunleavy
Douglas Jones Gerald Goldhnd
Maplewoods Improvement James & Catherine Gray
Association John Hartwdl
George McClintock Martha & Doug Head
Gerald & Marilyn Mitchell Michael Huntley
Raymond Mithun Jg Betty Jewett
James Nystrom Lyle & Kath Kasprick
I
I
I
I
I Name(s):
I
Address:
I
Paul & Barb Knudson
Al Luehmann
Thomas &: Barbara Maple
John & Betsy Massie
McGee
Deanne 5: Paul Moss
Bob Nygaard
Dick &: Marlys Ogle
William & Suzanne Peglow
Donna &: Cleo Powers
Frank Precopio
Roger & Carol Rovick
Eilene Shadier
Paul & Dawn Sjolnnd
Bonnie Skadsberg
Will & Kathleen Skadsberg
Robert Siocum
David Sutton
Russ & Bev Swcnson
Tim Todd
BUSINESS ($250)
Edina Realty-Wayzata
Lisa Erickson, realtor
Joel Hentges, realtor
Howards Point Marine
Paradise Charter Cruises
THANK YOU, Nancy Osgood
CONTRIBUTORS Eilene Shadier
TO THE Dennis & Nancy Stanga
FIREWORKS! Sharon Stark
Fred &; Alice Wall
UP TO $100 Peter Wattson
Judy &; David Zoschke
Gene &; Lois Adams
Richard Adams
Anderson TH.&NK YOU,
Paul & Peggy Buckman CON-rRIBUTORS
Gladys Burfield TO THE EXOTIC
Dave &: Carol Cole SPECIES FUND!
Chase &: Sue Correlius
John &: Jill Davis $$00+
Norma Hayer Dolliff
Merle &: John Dougherty David Fox
Karen &: Tom Hessian
Tom & Regina Hudson UP TO $I00
Diane & John Huston
Betty Jewett Kathtyn Bakko
Bruce & Carolyn Johnson Beniamin & Mary Jane Barnard
Carolyn Johnson Bruce & Carolyn Johnson
Darwin Klockers Marion Kaspar
Tom Knox Dr. & Mrs. Martinson
Dr. &: Mrs. Martinson
Dennis Nelson
Kent &: Lois Norby
mmmmmmmmmmem~mmm!
P/ease complete this form and mail it with your tax-deductible contribution to the Lake Minnetonka
Association, R O. Box 248, Excelsior, MN 55331. Make your check payable to the "LMA." Thanks!
E-mail:
City, State, Zip: Phone:
1. I want to support the LMA at the following membership level:
[] Basic $50 - $149 [] Sustaining $150 - $499 [] Captain $500+ [] Business $250
2. I want to support the "LMA Exotic Species Fund" . ................... $
3. Other or Additional ............................................ $
4. 2003 Fireworks Contribution ..................................... $
The LMA is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
,^1_ 4060- ~
Second Annual Lake Minnetonka
By Mike Mason, LMA Board of Directors
On June 21, the second annual Lake Minnetonka Clean-up day
was held. Over 50 SCUBA divers descended into Lake
Minnetonka and removed a considerable amount of trash. The
Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA) came up with the idea of
an annual lake dean-up day in 2001.
The dean-up was based out of Maynard's restaurant in
Excelsior. Crystal-Pierz Marine was again a major sponsor of
the event.
The divers spread out from Excelsior Bay to Wayzata Bay.
Some of the items retrieved from the depths included tires, bot-
tles, cans, old pipe, and anchors. One diver asked a local mari-
na if he could dive near the docks and he retrieved 30 pair of
sunglasses, 3 cell phones, 50 gas caps, three credit cards and a
number of keys. Two other divers visited St. Louis Bay and
retrieved a pick-up load of old tires.
The weather was great and the divers returned to Maynard's
for a wonderful lunch.
Crystal-Pierz Marine and a
number of local dive shops
also contributed prizes for
the divers. Two television
shows were also filmed
during the day. The
Environmental Leaning
channel (funded by the
Minnesota Lottery) filmed
a segment that has already
been aired, and Ron Schara's Minnesota Bound plans on show-
ing a segment on the clean-up next spring.
Next year's Lake Minnetonka clean-up day is already being
planned, scheduled for Saturday, June 19th. The LMA will be
working with the local cities to promote the idea of all Lake
Minnetonka lovers spending a part of a day each year cleaning
their shore line or
adopting a local beach,
boat launch or island-
much like the national
night out that seeks to
get neighbors to get to
know each other.
The LMA would like
to see neighbors get
together each year for
one day of giving back
to the lake that we all
love. For information
on how you can get
involved, contact
Mike Mason at
952-472-7399.
Help Support .the LMA Through the
University of Lake Minnetonka
The University of Lake Minnetonka is a for profit business that was created to
promote community within the Lake Minnetonka area. The University of
Lake Minnetonka sells hats, shirts and other clothing and donates 10% of
ALL PRODUCT SALES to the Lake Minnetonka Association.
You may purchase merchandise through their web site
(www. UniversityofLakeMinnetonka.com) and support the LMA. See their ad
in this newsletter.
Now is the time to think about holiday gift-giving!
Frankenfish?
This picture came across
the internet recently, along
with a story about the
snakehead. This exotic fish,
which was thought to have
been eliminated from
Maryland waters, has now
been found in the Rock
River in Southern
Wisconsin. Unlike most
aquatic animals, this fish is
air-breathing and can travel
across land. Obviously,
these fish did not walk
from Maryland, but their
appearance in Wisconsin is
just another reminder that
we must be vigilant in our
efforts to keep exotic plants
and animals away from
Lake Minnetonka.
The Legacy Foundation Delivers
On September 8th, The Legacy
Foundation delivered it's much antici-
pated proposal for the revitalization of
the Excelsior Commons Park. This
endeavor includes a new Band Shell,
new restrooms, visitor docks and a ren-
ovation of all other structures in the
park. Furthermore the proposal includes
the correction of drainage issues, land-
scaping, a fishing pier and the treatment
of a portion of storm water run off that
currently drains straight into Lake
Minnetonka. The LMA supports The
Legacy Foundation and its efforts.
Additional endeavors under considera-
tion include a lake wide trail System.
UNIVEItSIT¥ OF
LAKE MINNETONKA.
Get YOur Lake Gear!
Shop at Lake Country Outfitters
or online at
www, universityoflakerninnetonka.com
T-Shirts · Can Coolers · Hate * Sweatehirte · Floating Key Chains
'Fge donate ) O°~ of our pvcteds to the Lake lffmne~'n~ ~soc~ to hdp the fght agaimt Mitfoil & Zebra I~sels
DON STODOLA
WELL DRILLING CO., INC.
SINCE 1945
3841 North. Main St., St. Bonlfaclus, MN
WELL AND PUMP SERVICE
WEll ABANDONMENT
RICK STODOLA, President
Office (952) 938-2111 or (952) 446-WELL
Res. (952) 472-52S3 · FAX (9S2) 446-9670
www.stodolawell.com
MN# 27172
685 Excelsior Boulevard · Excelsior, ~ 55331
(952) 470-1800
ARE YOU...
· RETIRING?
· ALREADY RETIRED?
Jerry Bernard, founder of
Wealth Enhancement Group and
the Greedy Grandpa (as heard
on WCCO radio) offers his 30
years of investment experience.
For a complimentary, no
obligation consultation to
address your current and furore
financial needs
call 952-449-9579.
ITune into "Your
Money"
Sundays at 8:30 AM
1905 E. Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata, MN 55391 · 952-449-9579 · 800492-1222 · www. wealthenhancement, com
Securities offered through SI/Investments, Inc., a registered broker/dealer (Member NASD & SIPC).
Investment advice gh Wealth Enhancement Advisory Services, LLC, a registered investment advisor
NIAI 'JO!SleOX:l
80 I. 'ON l!tU~ad
C]lVd
o§~lSOd 'S'FI
980/I:IOEIdNON
zzg~-Irgss(j Nltt puno~
Pa poo/~ei~l
Jolmla. u!mpy/q!O punopt
1~--'~91, al Joquaol31 eplnqs p--j
i'II'II'-I-IT,,iiT,.,il,iI,,TT,,iI.iI,.iTTi,!
LSScJs NI3~ 'JO!SleOX:l
81~g XO~l 'O'd
NOI1¥1OO88¥ V)INO/:INNII31 3~IV-I
-4063-
General Fund $1,375,264
CDBG 1,581
Area Fire Protection Services 245,625
Grant Revolving 0
Cemetery (3,843_)
Dock 214,739
PW Facility 72,234
G.O. Improvement Bonds 73,184
Commerce Place TIF (143,316)
TIF 1-2 Notes 77,164
G.O. Bonds 2001 - A 9,434
G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 41,212
HRA Lease Rev Bonds (151,331)
Capital Improvement 992,118
MSA 14,860
Sealcoat 67,259
CDB 3,627
Downtown TIF 1-2 3,064,308
HRA Public Safety Bldg
1,000
Water 1,704,777
Sewer 1,126,016
Liquor Store (243,507)
Recycling 26,041
Storm Water 282,237
Fire Relief (74,893)
HRA 383
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included.
A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the
independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report
will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties.
In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds
available for spending.
10110~2003
CashReportCouncil
Gino
-4064-
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
~!~!' ', Sept. 2003
7 5.0 0°/o.~I
~?~ :'~' Sept. 2003 YTD
B~GET EXPENSE .EXPENSE .VARIANCE
PERCENT
EXPENDED
GENERAL FUND
Council 75,990 3,857
Promotions 3,750 0
City Manager/Clerk 257,150 18,968
Elections 1,080 0
Finance 215,100 15,634
Assessing 79,630 0
Legal 135,550 12,167
City Hall Building & Srvcs 172,650 5,514
Computer 28,640 574
Police 1,260,850 87,342
Emergency Prepardeness 7,130 22
Planning/Inspections 270,010 2,894
Streets 671,450 37,257
Parks 361,130 49,288
Transfers 203,350 16,946
Cable TV 50,000 0
Contingencies 44.290 0
53,104
3,750
180,444
326
155,264
83,227
91,167
133,586
11 520
83O 54O
1 556
223 287
357 394
225 562
152 513
21 904
2,298
22,886
0
76,706
754
59,836
(3,597)
44,383
39,064
17,120
430 310
5 574
46 723
314 056
135 568
50 837
28.096
41 992
69.88%
100.00%
70.17%
30.19%
72.18%
104.52%
67.26%
77.37%
40.22%
65.87%
21.82%
82.70%
53.23%
62.46%
75.00%
43.81%
_5.19%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3,837,750 250,463 2,527,442 1,310,308 65.86%
Area Fire
Service Fund 510,410 26,914 417,961 92,449 81.89%
Cemetery Fund 9,140 0 1,791 7,349 19.60%
DOck Fund 141,230 1,517 36,058 105,172 25.53%
TIF 1-2 0 87,955 326,518 (326,518)
Water Fund 679,880 65,712 429,507 250,373 63.17%
Sewer Fund 1,121,210 110,655 825,780 295,430 73.65%
Liquor Fund 495,850 37,018 372,867 122,983 75.20%
Recycling Fund 163,310 9,075 107,875 55,435 66.06%
Storm Water Utility 92,910 543 85,656 7,254 92.19%
Exp-02
10/10/2003
Gino
-4065-
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
Sept. 2003
75,00%
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Business Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Other Revenue
Street Lighting Fee
Charges to Other
Departments
Sept. 2003 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE ~
2,290,070 0 1,291,324 (998,746) 56.39%
6,930 0 8,540 1,610 123.23%
263,150 23,644 201,765 (61,385) 76.67%
502,930 0 165,282 (337,648) 32.86%
97,800 13,828 104,554 6,754 106.91%
117,000 10,068 77,041 (39,959) 65.85%
215,290 66 122,643 (92,647) 56.97%
0 8,930 35,266 35,266
14,000 774 7,093 (6,907) 50.66%
TOTAL REVENUE
3.507.170 57,310 2.013.508 (1.493.662) 57.41%
FIRE FUND
CEMETERY FUND
DOCK FUND
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
LIQUOR FUND
RECYCLING FUND
STORM WATER UTILITY
550,410 71,870 466,779 (83,631) 84.81%
5,000 0 2,795 (2,205) 55.90%
103,400 130 116,008 12,608 112.19%
625,000 67,093 437,325 (187,675) 69.97%
1,100,000 119,485 840,222 (259,778) 76.38%
2,110,000 159,650 1,606,381 (503,619) 76.13%
129,000 10,475 101,641 (27,359) 78.79%
115,000 9,729 82,553 (32,447) 71.79%
10/10~2003
rev01
Gino
-4066-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
ueepnaVeii, MN-u~;~I
(952) 745-0789
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER
Gregory S, Nybeck
October 17, 2003
Lake Minnetonka Water Patrol Update: Since 2001, there has been increased Water Patrol presence on Lake
Minnetonka by adding two full-time Hennepin County Sherifi's Office Patrol Deputies for five months from mid May
through mid October. tn 2001 and 2002, funding of this program was 50% from Hennepin County and 50% from the
Lake Minnetonka area. In 2003, funding of this program was 100% from Hennepin County. Continuation of'this
program is planned for 2004; however, Hennepin County might not be able either partially of fully fund it due to the
economic challenges that Hennepin County is facing. The LMCD and a number of member cities believe that
funding of these two additional Deputies should be the responsibility of Hennepin County and efforts are currently
being made for long-term funding of this project by Hennepin County. The LMCD will keep you informed on the
status of this project.
2003 Lake Minnetonka Solar Light Buoy Project: For the second consecutive boat season, solar lights purchased
with "Save the Lake" Funds were installed on top of existing red and green navigational buoys in 2003· Six areas of
Lake Minnetonka were chosen to participate in this project in 2003, up from three areas in 2002. These six areas
included: 1) two channels east of the Arcola Bddge, 2) the channel on the southeast side of Spray Island on the
Upper Lake, 3) both ends of the Narrows and Arcola Bridge channels, 4) the channel near Cedar Point East on
Wayzata Bay, 5) the channel on northeast Cooks Bay at the Emerald Lake Bridge, and 6) the channel on the west
side of Wawatasso Island on the Upper Lake. Feedback from this project in 2003 has been encouraging and
continuation of this project in 2004 is likely, with the possibility of expanding it to other areas of Lake Minnetonka.
2003 Lake Minnetonka EWM Harvestinq Program: The 2003 Lake Minnetonka EWM harvesting season
commenced on 6/10/03 and continued through 8/13/03. Consistent with past years, harvestirig priorities were based
upon impediment to pUblic boat navigation on the open water. The program in 2003 benefited from the purchase of
a new Aquarius Systems paddlewheel harvester and a used Aquadus Systems High-Speed Transport Barge, with
both purchases made from the EWM Equipment Reserve Fund that are donated funds and are derived from non-
levied tax dollars. LMCD staff is Currently preparing a 2003 EWM Final HarveSting Report to be presented at the
11/12/03 Regular LMCD Board Meeting. Similar to recent years, the EWM Harvesting Program Working Group will
met yet this year to evaluate the 2003 season and discuss possible improvements for 2004. Feel free to contact the
LMCD office if you would like a copy of the 2003 EWM Final Harvesting Report.
2003 Lake Minnetonka Zebra Mussel Program: In 2003, the LMCD coordinated a joint program with the Lake
Minnetonka Association (LMA) to keep zebra mussels and other exotic species out of Lake Minnetonka. In April, the
Board approved a State of Minnesota Contract not to exceed $18,000 for the 2003 zebra mussel inspection program
at selected public accesses. In 2003, there were 1,755 hours of inspections conducted by MN DNR inspectors at
public accesses on Grays Bay, Maxwell Bay, North Arm, and Spdng Park Bay from May 28th through September
9th. The LMCD and LMA staff are currently preparing a 2003 Zebra Mussel Inspection Program Report to be
presented at the 11/12103 Regular LMCD Board Meeting. Plans to continue the program in 2004 are on-going and
of vital importance with the recent infestation of zebra mussels in Lake Ossawinnamakee in the Brainerd area near
Pelican Lake and the Whitefish Chain. Feel free to contact the LMCD office if you would like a copy of the 2003
Zebra Mussel Inspection Program Report.
-4067-
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER, 10117103, PAGE 2
2004 Board Officers & Board Appointments: 2004 Board Officer and other Board appointments are planned in
committee for 2004 Board Officers. Additionally, LMCD staff ~ill be forwarding reminder notices in the near future to
those member cities whose Board member term expires at the second LMCD Regular Board Meeting in January
2004. Board member terms, as outlined in the LMCD's state enabling legislation, are for three years. Appointments
for 2004 Board Officers and other appointments will take affect at the 2/11/04 Regular Board Meeting. Feel free to
contact the LMCD office if you have questions or if you would like to further discuss this matter.
On-qoinq Licenses/Permits: In August, LMCD staff sent out renewal deicing installation applications for the 2003-
2004 season on Lake Minnetonka. The majority of these renewal applications have been received and processed
by LMCD staff. A copy of the approved license for each of these installations will be forwarded in the near future to
the appropriate member city. LMCD staff is currently working on sending out renewal without change applications,
for the 2004 season, for licensed multiple dock and DMA facilities. LMCD staff will also be working in the near future
on the preparation of renewal applications for charter boats and related liquor licenses for the 2004 season. Further
details of these on-going licenses/permits are available at the LMCD office.
· Web Page: The LMCD's WebPage address is: http://www.lmcd.org.
-4O68-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
7:00 PM, Wednesday, October 22, 2003
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster
· 11/6/03 Annual Meeting with the Hennepin County SherifFs Office Water Patrol,
8:00 A.M. at the Water Patrol Headquarters in Spring Park
· Discussion of November Board Meeting Schedule
READING OF MINUTES. 9/24/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min,)
PUBLIC HEARING
· Bayview Event Center, new multiple dock license and special density license
application to increase the length of transient Boat Storage Units (BSU's) 1-11 from
20' to 31'.
1. Public Hearing
2. Discussion and/or Consideration.
1. WATER STRUCTURES
2. ADMINISTRATION
A) Appointment of nominating committee for 2004 LMCD Board Officers;
B) Review of draft letter to be forwarded to LMCD Member Cities regarding Board
appointments for 2004;
C) Review of Resolutions 95, 96, and 98 that establish fees for LMCD applications;
D) Review of draft Executive Director Position Description;
E) Review of proposed payscales for Executive Director, Administrative Technician,
and Administrative Secretary positions;
F) Discussion of draft LMCD Data Practices Policy;
G) Additional Business;
-4069-
3. FINANCIAL
A) ..Audit of vouchers (10/1/03 - 10/15/03) & (10/16/03 - 10/31/03);
B) September financial summary and balance sheet;
C) Additional Business;
4. LAKE USE & RECREATION
5. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE ~
6. SAVE THE LAKE
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION- Performance Evaluation of Executive Director (Note: Board
may vote to conduct evaluation in closed session)
11. ADJOURNMENT
-4070-
DRAFT
LAKE MINNNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
.........~,~n,u OFDiff, ECTOR$
7:00 PM, Wednesday, September 24, 2003
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMilian, Orono; Tom
Skramstad, Shorewood; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Paul
Knudsen, Minnetrista; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Tom Seuntjens, Uinnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland;
Jose Valdesuso, Greenwood; Katy Van Hemke, Minnetonka. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD
Counsel; Grog Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician.
Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata.
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair'Foster
Foster stated that he had discussed the October Regular Board Meeting with Nybeck. Based on this
discussion, he recommended that a Board PlanningNVorkshop Session be scheduled for 10/8/03 and that a
Regular Board Meeting be scheduled for 10/22/03. If the Board did not object with this recommendation,
he stated that he would direct staff to proceed accordingly. There were no objections.
READING OF MINUTES- 8/27/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve the minutes from the 8/27/03 Regular
Board Meeting as submitted.
VOTE: Motion carded unanimously.
McMilian arrived at 7:06 p.m.
PUBLIC cOMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda.
Mr. Judd Mowry, 445 Lakeview Avenue, provided an update on the pending Hary Kreslins new multiple
dock license application. The applicant is currently addressing issues with the Greenwood Planning
Commission and c0ncems have been raised by Greenwood relating to the proposed Survey and the
placement of the dock along Minnetonka Blvd. He circulated a photograph of a violation of storing too
many watercraft at the site because an unauthorized personal watercraft was being stored at the private
access ramp. He encouraged the District to follow-up on this.
cONSENT :AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in' one motion unless a
Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent
agenda.
-4071 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
Page2
- C-aih--~ii~-tf,uv~d,'Bab(.;ut;k seconded 'toapprovea the consent agenda, removing-§{j~-n-d~iTe~ lA. Motion
carried unanimously. Items so approved included: 3B, AugUst financial summary and balance sheet, and
4A, Repod from the 3/5/03 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee Meeting.
WATER STRUCTURES
A. Staff recommends Board approval of partial refund of $250 deposits of approved variance
applications as outlined in 9/18/03 staff memo.
Foster asked for comments from Canning on why he had this agenda item removed from the
consent agenda.
Canning stated that he was concerned about the policy of the District of deducting costs for the
preparation of Findings~ whether they are for approval or denial of a proposed variance application,
from the $250 deposit. He believed that deducting expenses from the $250 deposit shOuld be
extraordinary. Because all variance applications require the preparation of Findings, he believed
that it should be included in the $250 base fee and might require increasing it.
Nybeck stated that Canning had raised similar concerns when staff made recommendations on
refunds for the $250 deposits for variance applications reviewed by the BoaFd this paSt summer.
When these concerns were raised, the consensus of the Board was for staff to schedule an
agenda item this fall to review the fee resolutions for District applications. He reported that the
review of fee resolutions would be scheduled at the 10/22/03 Regular.Board: Meeting.
Foster stated that he understood the comments of Canning that the $250 base fee should either
include the preparation of Findings for straight forward variance applications, or the base fee
should be increased accordingly, to be up front with the public. He suggested that this Could be
discussed when the Board reviews the fee resolutions and he recommended Board approval of the
recommendation by staff. ' :
Canning questioned whether it was fair to pass the fees incurred in the review of variance
applications because he believed that the levy paid by the member:cities shoUld cover these 'costs
and the residents should have the right to file for a variance for relief from the District Code.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the 2003 vadance application
deposits as outlined, in the 9/1'8/03 staff, memo,
VOTE: Ayes (12),'Nayes (1, Canning); motion'carried.
Richard Athmann and Robyn Kern, consideration of, draft Findings of Fact and Order for denial of
variance application to amend a previOusly approved VarianCe frb~ LMCD Code for Side Setbacks
and an adjusted dock use area at 1701 Baywood Lane.
Foster stated that there was a copy of the draft Findings of Fact and Order in the packet to deny
the proposed 'variance application. Additionally, there was a copy of a letter from the applicahts,
dated 9/18/03. He stated that the applicants would like to have the Board proVide them some
direction on three positions relating to approved variances and consent arrangements. These
-4072-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
Page 3
positions include: 1) docking and boat storage must be consistent with an approved vadance order,
................. c--ven.-i~'-y,~u-~,an s~cure conser, t.frorr~ [i,~ ,~bui.i. in9 ~i~jl~bu~(s); 2) docking and boat storage cannot
be done through consent from the abutting neighbor(s) when there is a need to utilize certain
aspects of the approved variance, citing dock length as an example, and 3) an approved variance
would be a legal right that could be passed on to future owners of the property but would not limit
abutting neighbors from consent arrangements from Code, especially encroaching of side setback
requirements. He asked for feedback from the Board members on these three positions.
Babcock stated that he believed that neighbors should not be able to change the terms of the
conditions of a variance approved by the District, such as the desire to store additional watercraft
or install a canopy, when water depth is a concern at such sites.
Foster stated that he envisioned allowing mutual consent at sites for side setback requirements,
noting that this was allowed in Code for sites that do not require a variance from Code. He agreed
that this might be problematic for length purposes.
Van Hercke questioned why a property owner would secure a vadance from Code if they could
secure mutual consent from the abutting neighbor(s).
Seuntjens stated that there are mutual consent arrangements all over around the lake. However,
once an application is submitted and approved for variance from Code, he questioned why the
District would allow the property owners to change the conditions at will.
Canning questioned whether the discussion and the pending variance application was a result of a
complaint situation. In general, he believed that the District would not get involved in consent
arrangements as long as the neighbors got along with each other. Similar violations occur
elsewhere around the lake and strict compliance with the conditions of an approved variance might
result in the reluctance of the public to submit variance applications in the future. He believed that
neighborhood consent is a fundamental issue that merits further discussion by the Board.
Nybeck stated that a complaint was received this past March for non-compliance with the approved
variance order at the Athmann and Kern site.
Babcock stated that there are Code provisions that define where a dock can be placed. He
expressed concern about creating a perception that there is a free for all on where you can place a
dock and store watercraft. Although the Code allows a site to combine with its neighbor(s) for
docking and watercraft storage, there are Code provisions that apply to these situations and the
District is involved.
Foster stated that he believed there are a number of sites around the lake where properties have
their own dock, rather than a combined dock, that do not meet the minimum side setback
requirements. The majority of these sites comply with Code because the abutting neighbor(s)
consent to it.
Babcock reminded the Board that the policy of the District has been voluntary compliance over the
years and not getting involved in neighborhood agreements or disputes. However, when neighbors
-4073-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
Page 4
change or relationships between neighbors change; a valid complaint is received frequently and
Seuntjens stated that he would be concerned about the District approving a vadance and
encouraging the property owner to violate the conditions of the variance order. He did not believe
that this would be allowed at any other public body, although he recogniZed that it was probably
occurring. If the District supports the violation of the conditions of the approved variance, the
Board should consider amending it.
Foster stated that he did not believe the question was whether the District was encouraging a
property owner to violate the conditions of an approved variance. The Code already allows side
setback and authorized dock use area requirements to be altered by neighbors through mutual
consent between themselves. He believed the pdmary question was if a property oWner had an
approved variance and they would like to do something with the abutting neighbor(s) through
mutual consent, should the ordinary Code be applied or should the conditions 'of the aPproved
vadance order be applied.
Babcock stated that the only aspect of the Code that he believed could possibly be done through
mutual consent would be adjusting minimum side setback requirements. He questioned whether
this should be allowed for the length of dock, the number of Boat Storage Units (BSU's), or whether
a canopy could be installed. He suggested that maybe the Code should be clarified to indicate that
all the maximum requirements of an approved vadance need to be met.
Knudsen stated that he would not be troubled by allowing neighbors to move a dock structure a
few feet, even if one of the property owners had an approved variance, However, he indicated that
he would be troubled by increasing the size of the dock structure, incree~.ising the number of BSU's,
or allowing the installation of a prohibited canopy because it would beoutside the inteht of the
Board, ·
Babcock stated that he believed the Code provisions that allowed combined docking situations
between neighbors was to encourage less activity, primarily reduce: dock str~ioture, rather than
encourage more activity.
LeFevere stated that there are two types of variances that the Board can:':api)'rbve: First, there is a
permissive.variance that allows a resident'to do something.:.'Second, the're:is a'mandatory vadance
that. c!~ady defines what can be done and takeS away'theirightS .of the abutting prope~ 'or
prope, rtie.s~ T. he Athmarm and Kern vadance isan exampleof a ~i~lt,'e' ~/a'rian~e: 'This type of
variance allows a property owner to do something, subject to certain co~Biti~ns, that'wOuld not
otherwise be authorized by Code. If a property owner wants to take advantage of this type of
vadan~e~ .theY would need tocomply with all of the conditions in the vadance ~rder an~l the
neighbors could not alter.them through, consent; Iftheproperty ownerdoes nbt'wantto take
advantageof the vadance .and would prefer to abideby the rules, the COde would allow~for this.
He pointed out that the Code would prohibit a property owner from both utilizing the~ approved
variance and altering the conditions through neighbor consent.
-4074-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
Page 5
BabcoCk questioned why the Board would allow sites, with narrow shorelines at insid-e-c_omers., the
- - abil,t~'y to ~t-'o,'e ,J-~bi'e ~Ni:l--tt~l=(;l"~[[ [hah wha'[was aJiow~-ea~-wl~i~l~n the authonzed d~k use area just by
combining their dock use area with the abutting neighbor(s).
Canning stated that he believed there are a number of sites aroUnd the lake that predated Code for
authorized dock areas that were able to place a dock and store a watercraft from the site
historically. The District Code is artificial in nature and there is a need to ensure that it is fair and
reasonable.
Babcock stated that what a property owner might perceive as fair and reasonable at a site with a
small amount of shoreline might only be allowed through mutual consent with the neighbors. If this
consent goes away at a future date, there will be a need to combine these sites with the abutting
properties or secure a variance from Code.
McMillan stated that mutual consent arrangements are temporary in nature and a variance is a
more permanent solution that describes the legal rights for a site.
Foster stated that if a complaint is received from the Public relating to not Waiving the minimum
side setback requirement of the Oode at a narrow lot, even if the site has historical use, the site
would probably not be able to have a dock installed with watercraft stored at it.
Canning quest oned whether.that could be categorically stated because he questioned whether it
would,hold up legally in court for properties that have dparian rights.
McMillan stated that~althoughshe believed the conversation was helpful, she recommended that
the Board focus on the scheduled agenda item, Although she didnot support expanding the width
of the dock use area beyond six feet on the north side, she indicated that she might be willing to
amend the conditions of the draft variance order to allow two personal watercraft or a small fishing
boat as long as they are fully contained within,the established dock use area.
Babcock stated that the number of watercraft to be stored at the proposed dock was discussed at
the 8!27/03 Board Meeting, The Board voted unanimously at this meeting to direct LeFevere to
prepare the Findings of Fact and Order to limit watercraft storage on the north Side of the dock to
one personal watercraft or a sma fishing' boat.
McMillan stated that she might have viewed the variance differently if all of the proposed watercraft
to,be stored at the applicants dock were Mly contained within the approv~ vadance' order,
Babcock questioned whether thmerestricted watercraft could be:stored at lots with approximately
25' of lakeshore frontage on a.lakewide basis~
Foster stated that hewas inclined originally .to support the storage of a second personal Watercraft
until he learned that the personal watercraft were to be stored side bY side and WoUld encroach in
the dock use area established in the approved variance order, He suggested that he might be able
to support the storage of the two personal watercraft end to end along the north side of the dock;
however, the applicant has previously expressed concem about this;
-4075-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
Page 6
MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Craig Nelson seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order to
.~---~::.--~ ~denyth~.ieh:ard-A{h:man n~ndRObyn-.Kern-vafiance applicatio nas~ubmitt-eck
Foster asked if there were any additional comments from the Board or if the applicants would like
to comment on the proposed motion.
Ms. Robyn Kern, 1701 Baywood Lane, made the following comments:
· There was a lack of communication between themselves and the previous property owners
when the property was purchased. She indicated that they had never intended to do as
they pleased for docking and storage of watercraft from the property.
· When they closed on the purchase of the new home, there was a much larger dock at the
site than what is currently installed. Additionally, they did not receive a document on what
they could and could not do for docking and storage of watercraft at the site.
· A number of non-compliant concerns raised by Nybeck have been resolved. These
include: 1) moving the dock over three feet, 2) reducing the length of the dock by eight feet,
and 3) removing an "L" dock section. The remaining discrepancy from the approved
variance order was the additional personal watercraft and this was the primary purpose for
the proposed variance application. She indicated they would be willing to amend the
variance application to store the two personal watercraft endto end if that was something
the Board desired.
· She believed that two of the primary reasons the Board was inclined to deny the proposed
variance application was the limited amount of lakeshore frontage at this site and the
congestion in the area~ She expressed concern about the permanent docks recently
approved for the three sites on the north side of the lagoon. These docks have been
installed and she indicated that they were huge, noting that boats being stored at them
could impede access to theirs and other docks.
Nybeck provided an overview of the variances :granted for the three Sites on the north side of the
lagoon area. All three sites have a permanent dock with an authorized dock use area that could
extend approximately 30' into the lagoon. The docks are a "T" design with a small space inside the
"T".along shore where smaller watemraft could be stored. Outside the "T", the dock use areas
extend 20' into the lagoon area and there is no restriction on the number of watemraftthat can be
stored in them, as long as:it complies with Code. The permanent docks require a perrnit that can
be issued by staff; however, the applicant needed to secure a variance for all three sites before
these permits were issued by staff.
Foster stated that one primary difference between the three properties on the north side of the
lagoon and the applicants' property is the amount of 929.4' shoreline. He pointed out that the three
properties on the north side of the lagoon each had approximately 100' of 929.4' lakeshore
frontage, compared to the 25' of 929.4' shoreline at the apPlicantS~propertyl
Kern questioned whether the Code was being applied consistently at their propertY compared to
the properties on the north side of the lagoon area. She also questioned Whether minimUm side
setbacks were not being met by a number of properties on the SOUth side of the lagoon. She
believed that the adding of a second personal watercraft at their site was a small distinction from a
small fishing boat that is already approved in the variance order,
-4076-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
page 7
Babcock stated that he believed past lake use studies would indicate that the use of a personal
watercraft requires a signific~nt larger amount of surface area to operate than most other
watercraft.
Kern stated that she was aware of the Code allowances for the number of restricted watercraft that
can be stored at a site, four. She believed that four restricted watercraft could be stored at their
site and that they submitted an application to amend the previously approved vadance to store the
additional personal watercraft. She indicated that Nybeck originally stated that he would support
the proposed application and that they would not have submitted it if they understood the Board did
not believe that it was a reasonable request.
Nybeck stated that the initial letter was sent in March communicating to the applicants that their
dock installation and boat storage were not in compliance with the approved variance order. The
applicants did not take the steps to bring the dock into compliance with the approved variance
order until July when staff threatened a cdminal complaint. He stated that he was encouraged the
applicants removed the illegal dock structure for added dock length and the "L" section, although
that was expected. He originally communicated that he would be supportive of the second
personal watercraft on the north side of the dock as long as they were contained with the six foot
wide dock use area. When the applicants indicated that the side by side lifts were eight feet wide, I
he expressed concern about further encroachment into the dock use area established in the
approved variance order.
Canning stated that he was reluctant originally to expand the dock use area from the approved
variance order.. However, he questioned whether the request to add the second personal
watercraft was monumental and that he would support amending the draft Findings to allow them
to do so.
Burma stated that there was another s tuation in the City of Mound where a variance was approved
that prohibited the installation of a canopy at the dock. He agreed that there'was a need to be
consistent about how ordinances or conditions of a variance order are enforced and that he would
be troubled to allow deviation in this case and not in the other situation. :'.
Valdesuso stated that he concurred with the comments of Canning that he would not be opposed
to all.ow the .applicants to store two personal watercraft back to back on the north side of the dock.
Kern stated that she believed the complaint received by the District was from Tim Becket, the
pr~vious~ property owner on the nQrth side ofthe lagoon area. She asked Nybeak who submitted
th~ co~plain! on their dockand he communicated.that he could not commenton that because
complaint data was covered by data privacy,, She stated that the new owner of the property on the
north side of thc lagoon area forwarded her a letter, that was previously faxed to Mr. Becker, after it
Was submitted to the District expressing her concern about why these lots were not buildable.
Nybeck stated that he was not aware of receiving the letter that Kern was making reference to. In
fact, that letter was more appropriate for the City of Mound because the re,platting was done by
Mound and not the District.
-4077-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
page8
Burma stated that the_letter referred to Kem~zas~prz)bably~submittedto_the_City~f_Moundandwas
likely public information.
Kern stated that she believed the complaint was filed because of this letter.
Canning recommended a friendly amendment to the motion to allow the storage of two personal
watemraft or a small fishing boat on the north side of the docks, SUbject to it being contained within
the six foot wide dock use area. Seuntjens and Craig Nelson did not agree to this fdendly
amendment.
MOTION: Canning moved, Valdesuso seconded to direct the attomey to prepare Findings of Fact
TO and Order to amend the previously approved vadance order to alloW the storage of a
AMEND personal watercraft on the north side of the dock, subjeCt to it being contained within the
six foot wide authorized dock use area.
LeFevere stated that motion was a substitute motion because the draft Findings of Fact and Order
being considered by the Board for denial of the variance application, rather than approval of it.
Rather than making a motion to amend the original motion to approve the draft Findings, he
recommended that those Board interested in approving the vadance oppose the original motion
and offer a substitute motion if the original motion fails.
Canning and Valdesuso withdrew their motion to amend the original motion.
VOTE: Ayes (10), Nayes (3, Canning, Knudsen, and Valdesuso); motion carried.
Foster stated that Steve Tallen, the District Prosecuting Attorney, and Lt. Brian Johnson from the
Sheriff's Water Patrol were in attendance to discuss a recent case that the District might want to
appeal. If the Board did not object, he recommended that agenda item 2D be moved in front of
agenda item tC. There were no objections expressed bY the Board.
2. ADMINISTRATION
D. Steve Tallen, report on possible appeal.
Foster asked for an update from Tallen on a criminal case that the DistdCt"migh(want to appeal.
Tallen
made the following comments:
He was in attendance to diScUSs a recent cdminal case that the District might Want to
appeal. He indicated that he ~WOU'ld explain the'facts of the case, that Lt. johnson was in
attendanCe to expl'airi the cib'n'se~i:uenceS oftl~e~OUtCOniebn the' Water Patr(~i if'an appeal
does not take place, and then go into eXeCutive session to discuss Whether the B°ard
would like to aUthorize an appeal;'
Mr. Daniel McCloud early last November allegedly heady struck a boat with a Sheriff's
water'Deputy and MN DNR Conservation Officer in it. He continued to drive his boat to a
do~k,, he left the boat and was leaving the dockl and the other passenger in the boat then
was ddving the boat away from the dock. The Water Patrol Deputy asked Mr. MCCIoud to
come back to the dock by the Water Patrol Deputy and the MN DNR Conservation Officer
-4078-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District "
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003 page 9
asked the other passenger to bring the boat back to the dock while they sorted through the
· issueS~-BothMrFMCCloud-an~d-th~ passenger compqi~d' w-ith-these requestS.
· A safety check of the McCIoud boat Was conducted at that point by the Deputy and
ConServation Officer, with two tickets issued based on it, No ticket was issued at that point
for carelesS driving; however, two tickets were issued for the lack of a fire extinguisher and
PFD's.
· These tickets eventually went to court and he believed that they had made a deal agreeable
where Mr, McCloud would plead guilty to one of these tickets and pay the fine. Around that
time, the Minnesota Court of Appeals released their opinion on the Colisimo case that
upheld a District Court ruling that requires probable cause to check a livewell in a boat. The
District Court in the McCIoud case ruled that the stop at the dock of Mr. McCIoud and the
calling back of the passenger in the boat was warranted because of the careless ddving
incident. HoWever, the District Court ruled that the safety inspection was unconstitutional
citing the Colisimo case. He stated that the MN Supreme Court has reviewed the
Minnesota Court of Appeals ruling on the Colisimo case on 9/25/02 and that an opinion
shOuld be due any time.
· Based on the facts, he questioned whether the Board would like to appeal the District Court
ruling on the McCIoud case. If the Board decides to appeal, he reminded the Board that
this would be a pre-trial appeal and the Distdct would be obligated to pay the other sides
attorney fees, win or lose. He concluded that the ruling was important and that Lt. Johnson
could further elaborate on this,
· He entertained questions or comments from the Board,
Babcock questioned what legal ground the District was on because the search was conducted
before the issuing of the citations for the lack of a fire extinguisher and PFD's.
Tallen stated that both c,[at OhS are misdemeanor offenses,that authorize 'the Water Patrol to issue
a custOdial.arreSt, The,Standard n thepast has been that if a legitimate misdemeanor arrest
occurs, that~a safety inSpect on canbe conducted. The misdemeanor arrest OCCUrred when the
DepUty and the Conservation Officer asked Mr. McCIoud to return to the dock because he was not
free to leave.
Canning stated he was concerned that the original citations were later amended to include careless
driving. ~
Tallen s{ated that ~b defendantin th s case was detained,or se zed on a constitutiona basis. The
q%Sildn'pi i cob' to answer WaS whether the S~i~ure'~as reasonable.
Foster stated that it has been common practice for the Water Patrol historically to conduct safety
checks for :!ire jackets and fire ext!nguishers.when a stop has been made~: He'bel eyed that there is
gray' area in the interpretation of the Code. for careless, driving wh ~ it. is generally black and white
for vi&iat!ohs °~S~ed,through' SafetYche.Cks: The'qUeSt on for'tl~e Board is that the ruling of the
District C(~Urt does not allow for safety checks to occur.
Pete Nelson asked how the District Court made its ruling on the McCIoud case when the
Minnesota State Supreme Court was reviewing the Colisimo case.
-4079-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
september 24, 2003
page 10
Tal.len stated that he questioned what affect the Coils mocase should have hadon the ruling of the
McCloud case in the District Court because itwas being appealed. At this time, the ruling from the
MinneSota Court of ApPeals in the Colisimo CaSe is that the livewells cannot be searched by peace
officers unless probable cause has been established, noting that this could probably be applied to
safety checks.
'Knudsen aSked if the Water Patrol either looked or asked for PFD's and a fire extinguisher in the
McCIoud case.
Tallen stated that the Water Patrol Deputy asked the defendant whether they had an adequate
number of PFD's and a fire extinguisher, adding that the defendant responded that he had neither.
In the McCIoud case, he believed that the District Court judge ruled that the Water Patrol Deputy
should not have asked the defendant whether he had a proper fire extinguisher and PFD's
because they did not have a reason to suspect that he did not. If the Colisimo case is the law of
the land, it is quite possible that the Water Patrol will be done conducting safety inspections.
FOster asked for comments from Lt. Johnson prior to the Board considering ClOsing the Regular
Meeting and going into executive session to discuss whether to appeal the McCIoud case.
Lt. Johnson stated that the ruling on the MCCIoud case was far reaching and could impact all
Conservation Officers and Water Patrol Deputies from other counties within the State of Minnesota.
The Water Patrol enforces the laws of the State of Minnesota and the District, especially those for
public safety purposes. The Distdct Court ruling on the UcCIoud case will have an impact on the
Water Patrol enforcing the lawS of the State of Minnesota and the DiStriCt. Dudng safety
inspections, the DePuties ask the oCCUpant for pieces of equipment and only board a boat when a
person is being taken into custody. The ruling of the District Court greatly impacts how safety
inspections can be Conducted, especially if the BOard decides Wot to appeal.the caSe, He
concluded that there was a need for. clarifiCation from the court on the legal Standard because the
word will get 'out and the Water Patrol will be faCed'With this issue again in the fUture.
McMillan asked if there were any similarities or differences between stops on land and on the
water.
Tallen stated that one primary difference between violations on Lake Minnetonka and those on
land was that violations of Distdct Code are misdemeanors by ordinance and the majodty of
violations on land are ~ttY misdemeanors. One keYdistinction iSthat a peffy ~isde~e~nor stop
does not give the arresting offiCer the opportunity i0 search your vehible; however, a misdemeanor
stop does.
MOTION: Canning moved, BabCodk seconded to c oSe th'e RegUlar BOard Meeting from the public
and to convene into executive'Session at 8:55: p.m. to discUs~ pending litigation with the
DistriCt attorneys, as al'i°wed for ciient~attomey privileges b~the OPen Meet ng Law.
VOTE: Motion carded unanimously.
Foster asked the public in attendance to leave the meeting room so that the BOard could go into
executive session.
-4080-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September24,2003
page 11
MOTION: BabcbSk moved; Knu-dsen seconded to Cl0Se the exeCUtive session at 9:51 p.m. and re-
open the Regular Board Meeting,
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Seuntjens left during the executive session,
The meeting was recessed at 9:51 p.m. and re-convened at 9:55 p.m,
MOTION: Suerth moved, Valdesuso seCOnded to direct the District ProSecuting Attorney to
proceed with an appeal of the McCIoud cdminal case,
Suerth stated that he made the motion because he would like to support the Water Patrol and that
he believed the vast majority of the 14 member cities would support the appeal of this case.
VOTE: Ayes (11), Nayes (1, Canning); motion carried.
1. WATER STRUCTURES
C. Howards Point Marina, discussion of Board possible enforcement issues.
Foster introduced the agenda item and asked for comments from the Board,
Skramstad stated that there was a representative from HOWards Pbint Marina in attendance before
the executive session that was nOt in attendance at this time. He recommended that this agenda
item be moved back to the 10/22/03 Regular Board Meeting.
The consensus of the Board was to move this agenda item back to the 10/22/03 Regular Board
Meeting.
D. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
2. ADMINISTRATION
A. · Meeting' Rep(~rt from the 9/10/03 B0ard PlanningRVork'Sh0p'$e~SiOn;
Foster stated that there was a ~pyof the draft'M~tin'g Report in the packet from [l:ie 9/iOi03
Planning/WorkshOP sessibn, He: asked if:there were any questions or comments from theBbard on
this meeting, There were no questi6ns of commeti[S.
Bm
Gm
Discussion of draft LMCD Data Practices PolicY.
The consensus of the Board was to move this agenda item tb the 10/22/03 Regular BOard Mee!ing '
DiscusSion of proceSS to egtabli~h nominating committee for 2004 LMOD BOa~
-4081 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
Page 12
The consensus ofthe Board wasto move this agendaitem tothe t0/8/03 Planning/Workshop
Session.
E. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
3. FINANCIAL
A. Audit of vouchers (9/1/03 - 9/15/03) & (9/16/03 - 9/30/03).
Skramstad reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Suerth seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted,
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
LAKE USE & RECREATION
B. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
5. EWMIEXOTIC$ TASK FORCE
There was no discussion.
6. SAVE THE LAKE
There was no discussion.
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Nybeck stated that the lake level was 928.45' on 9116103, adding that the dam was closed. There were
a couple of newspaper articles in the packet relating to District activities. He stated that he and Harper
had recently removed the red and green solar-lights from the navigational buoys, noting there was
some limited vandalism of them near the Arcola Bridge. A letter from the City of Shorewood, with a
written response from Chair Foster, was included in the handout folders for informational purposes.
Skramstad stated that he had been contacted by the City of Shorewood and that they would like to
have the Board discuss the letter and take the matter seriously. He indicated that he was at the
Shorewood City Council Meeting that evening and that Foster had indicated to him that he was in
attendance representing both himself as a Lake Minnetonka resident on certain issues and as Chair of
the District on other issues. As the representative for City of Shorewood on the Distdct Board, he
-4082-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
September 24, 2003
Page
indicated that he would like to bring this matter forward to the Board and he encouraged feedback from
other Board members.
Babcock stated that when a Board member attends a city council meeting, they should not attend as
both a representative of the Distdct and the public. Instead, there is a need for the Board member to
chose one of the two roles and attend a second city council meeting if needed to represent the other
role.
Foster stated that the minutes from the city council meeting clearly stated that he was in attendance
representing both the District from a factual basis and his personal interest as a resident of Lake
Minnetonka.
The Board briefly discussed this matter and the consensus of the Board was to further discuss
procedures for when Board members attend city council or other governmental meetings at the 10/8/03
Board PlanningNVorkshop Session.
8. OLD BUSINESS
Van Hercke updated the Board that the City of Minnetonka had recently adopted a resolution that
supports Hennepin County fully funding the two additional Water Patrol Deputies in 2004, She stated
that Commissioner Koblick supports the project for the 2004 season and that she has recommended
that an effort be made to contact the remaining Hennepin County Commissioners.
Suerth stated that he would like talking points memo that summarizes the key points to discuss when
these contacts are made.
9. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjoumed at 10:19 p.m,
Albert O. Foster, Chair
Lili McMillan, Secretary
-4083-
-4084-
~0'~ O~90~2_,~ IdDINF~mmu.~ ~mNO.L~NNIN ~>~ld-1 NO;~q NU~O:~ £OO~-9'~-O'~
10-16-2003 11:09AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4?20620 P.O5
-4085- TOTAL P.03
Hennepin County Transportation Department
1600 Prairie Drive
Medina, MN 55340-5421
763-745-7500, Phone
763-478-4000, Fax
763-478-4030, TDD
www. co.hennepin.mn.us
October 13, 2003
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
RE: Planning Grant
Dear Ms. Hanson:
The County Emergency Preparedness Staff has finished reviewing the material you
submitted to support your claim under this grant.
I am pleased to inform you that your submittal was approved in its entirety with no
further changes or actions needing to be done on your part.
This means that our Department has certified your plan as meeting the State's current
requirements in respects to terrorism response planning.
As detailed in the application material for this grant, your jurisdiction now qualifies for a
grant award of $6,365.00.
I and the rest of our staff would like to thank you for completing this task in such a timely
manner.
Sincerely,
Hennepin County Emergency Preparedness
cc: Melissa Watkins
An Equo/ Opportunity Employer - 4'0 8 6 - Recycled Poper
Medi
MEDIACOM COMMUNITY LEADER OCTOBER 200;3
Important information for Elected Officials, Staff, and Community Leaders
from your Cable Television and Broadband Services Provider
Mediacom's Broadband Services:
A "One-Two Punch" Impact for
Local Economic Development !
Mediacom's investment in upgrading and rebuilding
its physical plant facilities has provided our
communities with a benefit beyond traditional cable
television services. In addition to the local taxes,
employment, and franchise fees generated by
Mediacom services, the new broadband pfatform
enables businesses to compete and access a world
wide market through our high speed internet services
as well as providing an advantage through affordable
and effective local advertising opportunities.
Punch. #1: High Speed Internet Connects
with Businesses. The deployment of high speed
access to the Internet through Mediacom Online has
been very well received by our residential customers.
And now, Mediacom offers four additional levels of
Internet Services to businesses. The service levels
offer even faster access and expanded features
designed to assist business customers in capturing
efficiency, saving costs, and expanding their markets.
Punch #2: Affordable Local Advertising
on Mediacom Cable Services. In most
communities, Mediacom also offers local businesses
an edge by providing ad insertion capabilities through
our in-house ad placement OnMedia. OnMedia
offers affordable access to available commercial ad
space inserted on Mediacom cable television
programming including ESPN, Lifetime, and many
others. OnMedia can be contacted at 1-800-591-
8062 for more information. The local to local
exposure through OnMedia is an effective tool for
local business to expand and lead in the
marketplace.
Both of the "One-Two Punches" are the a direct
benefit to the communities Mediacom serves.
Mediacom continues to explore ways in which our
broadband platform can launch additional services in
the future. Our Mediacom family is proud of the
success of the execution of the Mediacom plan to
upgrade and interconnect of our systems and the
deployment of enhanced services to our customers -
both businesses and residents!
Broadband's Local
Economic Impact
A recent study: Reinvesting In America: An Analysis
of the Cable Industry's Impact on the U.S. Economy
provides a look at the direct and indirect economic
impact of the cable industry. Since 1990, many cable
companies, including Mediacom, have invested in the
deployment of broadband services throughout the
country.
Highlights of the study include:
· Since 1990, the cable industry provided
direct and indirect employment to over
570,000 people. This represents nearly 3%
of all new jobs created in the US economy
over this twelve-year period.
· Since 1996, the cable industry has invested
approximately $75 billion to implement new
technology and create additional bandwidth
necessary to provide new services for
consumers.
· In 2002, the National Cable Television
Association estimates that franchise fees
totaled over $2 billion, reflecting funds paid
directly to local municipalities.
· An additional $1.4 billion in sales and use
taxes was paid to state and local government
entities.
· Cable is the viewer's choice. In 2002, for the
first time ever-aggregate primetime
viewership of ad-supported cable networks
exceeded the combined primetime
viewership of the seven broadcast networks
for a full calendar year.
Dr. Ron Rizzuto, University of Denver, stated, "The
fruit of the cable industry's reinvestment will be
harvested in the future as this advanced
communications infrastructure: 1) enhances the
worldwide competitiveness of the U.S. business
community, 2) reduces long-term communications
costs for households and businesses, and 3)
facilitates the realization of the economies of scale
required to unleash the creative talents of individuals
and bring new programming ideas and products to
market"
-4087-
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT HAVA
Alternative Voting Technologies for Voters With Disabilities
1. I understand HAVA requires that we have voting
equipment accessible for voters with disabilities. Is
this true?
Yes. Under HAVA, each polling place must contain a
voting system that is accessible for individuals with
disabilities, including for visually impaired voters, in a
manner that provides the same opportunity for
accessibility and participation (including privacy and
independence) as for other voters.
2. Will HAVA's Alternative Voting Technology
requirements affect all precincts in the state?
Not necessarily. Where more than one precinct's voters
cast their ballots at the same polling place, one piece of
alternative voting technology can serve all voters at that
polling place.
3. Why must we have new voting equipment for the
blind when we have always had provisions for them
to vote?
Our existing procedures for visually impaired voters
require them to tell another person how they wish to
vote. HAVA requires that they be provided the same
privacy, independence, and access in voting that
"seeing" voters have.
4. How will we be able to verify that the new
equipment accurately recorded voters' selections?
As with existing voting equipment, accuracy testing will
verify the ability of the voting equipment to record and
count ballots accurately.
5. Will new voting equipment make it clear to me
exactly who I voted for before I cast my vote?
Yes. HAVA requires that any new voting equipment
allow voters to verify their choices privately and
independently before their ballots are cast and counted.
Voting equipment certified for use in Minnesota by the
Office of the Secretary of State will assure that vote
choices are clear to voters when they verify their votes.
6. Will new voting equipment allow me to change m)
vote choice(s) before I cast my vote?
Yes. HAVA requires any new voting equipment to allow
voters the opportunity to change their choices privately
and independently before the ballot is cast and counted.
7. How would recounts be conducted with the new
voting machines?
The recount process will depend on the specifics of the
voting machines being used. The requirement to verify the
result in a close race will be met, no matter what
equipment is used.
SEE THE NEXT EDITION FOR MORE HAVA FAQs
Past editions of the HAVA Update can be found at
http://www.sos.state.mn.us/HAVA/HAVANews.htm !.
Office of the Minnesota
Secretary of State
180 State Office Building
100 Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr Bird
Saint Paul MN 55155
-4088-
Page 1 of 2
Kandis Hanson
From:
Sent:
Subject:
"Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us>
Tuesday, October 21,2003 1:39 PM
Westonka.news
Westonka.news
October 21, 2003
Westonka.news is a series of occasional notes from Superintendent Gene
Zulk. As in prior years, Westonka.news subscribers will also be informed
of breaking news related to the Westonka Public Schools. To unsubscribe,
see instructions at end of this message.
Here's a quick look at three topics on our plates this month:
1) October activities bring good news
Homecoming week was terrific--and how about that overtime football
win!! During events like Homecoming, I'm always reminded of why I'm
proud to live and work here. The traditional parade, demonstrations of
school spirit, and wise behavior choices by students are visible
examples of what a great community we live in.
Last week's parent/student/teacher conferences went well, and our staff
worked hard to let parents know that no stone would be left unturned in
our efforts to meet their child's school needs. We strive to do that
every day, for every student.
2) Focus on Teaching and Learning
Teaching and Learning Director Mark Femrite, Gifted and Talented
Education Director Sandy Lundak, and I are visiting staff in all
buildings this month to update them on district initiatives in the areas
of curriculum, teaching, assessments, and gifted/talented education.
Our School Improvement Teams in each building meet regularly to address
student achievement and to develop effective ways for teachers to
connect with staff in other buildings through the District Teaching and
Learning Team. The Teaching and Learning Team reports progress every
month at Westonka school board meetings (if you can't attend board
meetings, catch them on the LMCC local cable station).
3) Buildings and Grounds
We've been working hard over the past couple of years to enhance the
physical appearance of our buildings and grounds, and many of you have
commented that the grounds, particularly over the summer and into fall,
have never looked better. We're pleased that our plan for grounds upkeep
is on the right track. Now we're turning our attention to the buildings.
The school board has heard a report from facilities assessment experts
E&V/3DI regarding the condition of every building in the school
-4089- 10/21/2003
Page 2 of 2
district. As we begin to plan for our next five-year
maintenance/technology bond referendum in 2006, we are being careful to
prioritize maintenance/repair needs, get a firm grasp on cost estimates,
and ensure that each and every project fits in with the overall needs of
the district.
I hope all of you read our 2002-2003 Annual Report from cover to cover.
We changed the format of the report so that it would contain more useful
information and reach more community members. And, as always, I invite
you to let me know how we're doing.
Sincerely,
Gene Zulk
Superintendent
Westonka Public Schools
To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson
at
<olsonb(~,westonka.k 12.mn.us>
Westonka.news is published by the Westonka Public Schools Community
Relations Department. The information contained in this message is given
in good faith based on available information. According to the State of
Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is public data.
-4090- 10/21/2003
PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
October 9, 2003
Present:
Commissioners Susan Taylor, Ron Motyka, Gene Hostetler, Norm
Domholt (arrived late), Park Supervisor Jim Fackler, Secretary
Denice Widmer, Public Works Director Carlton Moore
Absent/Excused:
Commissioner John Beise, City Council Representative Bob
Brown
Vice-Chair Derrick Hentz brought the August 14, 2003 to adjournment. Motion by
Motyka to adjourn the August 14, 2003. Second by Derrick. No Discussion. Motion
carried. Meeting of August 14, 2003 adjourned at 7:36pm.
Chair Susan Taylor called the meeting to order at 7:37pm.
of Au 2003 Minutes
9/11 ceremony.)
Motion by Hostetler to approved
Motyka. No discussion. Motion carried.
No agenda changes.
No citizens present.
Discuss: Park Dedication Funds for Weil.·
Fackler gave brief overview. Short
to pay for the Weiland Park water fountain out
Second by Discussion. Motion carried.
Discuss:
Tabled
su
Discuss:
Taylor had
was. Was informed
parks on their own.
for discussion on park to~
Review: Agenda Calendar
meeting cancelled due to
~03 Minutes. Second by
Fountain
by Hostetler
e Park Dedication Fund.
(Commissioners were reminded to bring
~nd/Langdon Bay Park to that meeting.)
what the outcome of the parks tours
~cision was to have each commissioner tour the
uested each commissioner to come prepared
at the November meeting.
Added: Park Naming, Snowmobile Ordinance Review, Park Tour Results
REPORTS:
Skate Park:
Hostetler stated there have been delays due to volunteer schedules, but the
park is coming along. They are still planning to finish this fall and have the
dedication ceremonies in the spring of 2004.
Park Update:
Fackler gave a brief updates on both Rottlund/Langdon Bay Park and
Weiland Park.
Motion to adjourn by Derrick. Second by Hostetler. Motion carried. Meeting
adjourned at 8:00pm.
-4091 -
Page 1 of 5
Kandis Hanson
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us>
"Lea h Weycke~' <weyckerl. Cen tral.Weston ka@weston ka. kl 2. mn. us>
Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:03 PM
WHCC agenda 10/22
Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
** Agenda -October 22, 2003 **
12:00 - 1:30 PM
Gillespie Center
2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound
Any comments or questions, contact Leah Weycker, Collaborative
Coordinator,
at 952-491-8058 or ~y.~!~r!~.~.~.~.o..~._a.~,_k!_~.~.~
1. Lunch 12:00
Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a light "free will
donation" lunch, suggested value $6.00.
2. Introductions
3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes
4. Armouncements
5. Local Collaborative Time Study (LCTS) Financing Framework
Each family service collaborative in Hennepin County contributes 5% of
their LCTS earning to the Childrens Mental Health Collaborative. We will
review the county wide task force recommendations for the framework.
5. Sharon MacDonald, coordinator of "Reduce the Use" in Hopkins
Sharon will present her successful "Reduce the Use" program
implemented in the Hopkins schools. She will help us come up with a
value position or community statement about chemical use.
"If you think you can, you can. If you think you can't, your right."
-- Mary Kay Ash
** Advisory Group Updates **
Health
Sandy Olstad, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke, Carol Miletti,
Kevin Erickson
With our funding, SAVE is conducting presentations on suicide and
-4092- 10/15/2003
Page 2 of 5
depression awareness in the 8th and 10 grade classes. This was very
successful in the past.
The depression and suicide awareness task force will be reviewing
curriculum for the weekend camp.
Youth Activities
Sandy l~auschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Kathy Jones, Kim
Erickson Heiar
Cement is being poured for the walls at the skate park. Much of the
work will be done this fall and the finishing will take place in the
spring. Special thanks to Gene Hostetler for the endless hours of
coordination.
The youth center at Grandview Middle School started slow because of the
nice weather. We expect it to pick up when the word gets out and the
winter arrives.
Parent Education
Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Bill Erickson, Amy Taggart
Three new parents attend our meeting and discussed community issues
related to parenting. Thanks to the work of Amy Taggart, we hope to
keep the parent engaged and address some of the issues they identify.
111 people attended the popular parent education speaker Corwin
Kroenberg. Plans are being made to have him back this spring.
Amy Taggart, our parent advocate, will attend a seminar on building
parent participation. She continues to present information on parenting
around the community.
Community
Margaret Holste, Carol Olson, Ginny Lazano, Jeanette Metz, Dena
Kuenzel
The housing information fair is scheduled for March 9, 2004 at the
Gillespie Center. We will have presentations for first time home owners,
renters, and senior citizens, as well as a resource fair. We will be
looking for participants.
Executive
Craig Anderson, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy
Raushendorfer, Mary Hughes
The Executive group did not need to meet.
Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County
A financing framework recommendation is in. We will discuss it at the
next meeting.
County commissioner Gail Dorfman hosted a panel discussion on issues in
childrens mental health.
** Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
Meeting minutes Septembre 24, 2003 **
Present: Kathy Jones, JeanAnn Thayer, Johanna Eckman, Sandy Olstad,
Jim Kurtz, Craig Anderson, Laura Lundberg, Ginny Lozano, Jeanette Metz,
-4093- 10/15/2003
Page 3 of 5
Carol Olson,
Margaret Holste, Sandy Rauschendorfer, Mary Hughes, Kim Erickson-Heiar,
Mandy Licklider-Baseman, Amy Taggart, Bill Erickson, Sandy Wing, and
Leah Weycker.
Guests: Jenny Brown, Parent, and Mike Lamprecht, School Psychologist
1. Announcements:
* Carol and Leah shared written information about effective
collaborative efforts and community parmerships, and asked that members
complete a short questionnaire about their participation in WHCC.
* Carol shared that Corwin Kronenberg's presentation "Teaching Kids to
be Responsible" last evening, sponsored by WHCC and school district
PTA's, was informative and well attended (111 people signed in). She
passed around the books he had recommended. Bill will check if they are
available at the Westonka Library.
* WeCAN is moving to 2434 Commerce Blvd. on October 4 and could use
volunteers to help. Leah shared that four young people who had
participated in NYPUM this summer helped pull out carpet at the new
office and did a fantastic and speedy job. And speaking ofNYPUM, 10
out of 11 young people completed the program this summer and earned
shirts.
* The WHCC yearly calendar was distributed with reminders about the
budget timelines including spending proposals being due in early
January. Proposals need to relate to WHCC goals. Work groups are
usually the source of proposals with RFP's being sought only if we want
some for a specific goal. Budget cuts will likely impact the number of
hours the Westonka Library is open, a cost saving measure affecting all
mid-size libraries in the county.
* The WeCAN Walk will be held on Sunday, October 12, 2003.
* A two day "Cancer and the Family" session will be held at St. John's
on Tuesday evenings, October 7 and 14, 2003, facilitated by staff from
Park Nicollet. Sandy Olstad also shared information about the "Aging
Well" Sunday Forums being held at St. John's, as well as the Blood Drive
on Thursday, September 25, 2003.
* The after school drop-in center at Grandview Middle School will open
on October 6, 2003 from 2:30 - 4:30 each day. Students will name the
center and help decorate. The YMCA will staff the center. Funding has
come from WHCC ($7100) and the VFW ($3400). and Community Ed. Students
will be charged $1 per time with scholarships available to those in
need. A letter is being sent to all households of students at GMS as
well as having information in school newsletters. Any students in the
building after school not under adult supervision will be "sent" to the
center.
* The domestic violence support group is growing. Denise Eng, the
Sojourner outreach staff person, will have office hours in Mound on
Tuesdays.
2. Additions or Changes to the Agenda or Minutes:
There were no changes to the agenda. Jeanette moved approval of the
minutes as printed, seconded by Sandy O. Motion carried.
-4094- 10/15/2003
Page 4 of 5
3. Update on the Westonka Schools Relate Counseling Project and Issues
High School Students are Addressing Today:
Mike Lamprecht, Westonka School Psychologist, shared Information about
the 10 hour per week project funded by WHCC that provides counseling to
students/families that haven't been able to access it in other ways. 40
students with a variety of issues were seen last year between January
and June. A student/family can receive up to 10 hours of service with a
referral to a community agency being made after that, if needed. The
Relate therapist assigned to the project has effectively worked with
students, parents, and staff. Staff tried to get additional funding for
this year to expand her hours. However, because the Ridgeview
Foundation didn't approve funding, the Park Nicollet Foundation Grant,
which was contingent on that approval, was also lost. Staff plans to
submit requests to them and the WHCC for next year.
Leah shared that she has recently received calls from parents
expressing concern about student use of alcohol and their fear that use
is increasing. Kathy Jones, Westonka Chemicsal Health Counselor,
responded that our concerns/issues are the same as those in other
communities. However, this doesn't lessen the need for concern.
Availability and perceived risk are major factors in a student's
decision to use, and currently there is little perceived risk about
using alcohol or marijuana. She shared that parents are really
important in kid's lives! She said that it's about relationships and
being authentic and trustworthy. Talking with other parents and
maintaining rules between middle and high school is important. She
hared written information, "What Adolescents Need" as well as 5 key
messages to parents. She also shared an "awesome" pamphlet for
parents called "Shoulder to Shoulder: Raising Teens Together" which
also includes a website: ~.__.s._h.~o.~_!d_e_~.~_..h..~_~!~_e_m_~_~e_sQ_t_._a_;~rg. These
booklets have been shared with parents at school orientation sessions
this fall and will be available at conferences. Discussion of the
importance of the information gained through the MN Student Survey and
the recent legislative change that requires "active parent consent" led
to a motion made by Jeanette that we send a letter to Gen Olson and
Steve Smith, listing names of WHCC members and who they represent,
asking for their support of continuing the MN Student Survey,
implementing it as it was done in the past with "passive" parent
permission. Motion seconded by Kim and passed unanimously. Kim also
asked if there are groups in our area that look at "shared values" for
the community to support parents in their efforts with their teens.
Because adolescents lack the brain development to make good judgments
on a consistent basis, they need parents to provide structure. And yet
the varied parent response to the Mound police giving citations/"minors"
at a recent youth drinking party, including anger at the police,
indicates a need for work with parents. Craig suggested developing
"tips" for parents of kids given minors including a list of
resources. Jeanette suggested that we develop a "position statement"
for the community and "put it everywhere". It was agreed that each work
group would discuss the issue and develop messages for youth and ways to
-4095- 10/15/2003
Page 5 of 5
disseminate them. The Newsletter we've discussed in the past would be
one vehicle for doing so. Kim offered that she would bring this to the
youth work group, and Amy will do so with the parent group. It was also
suggested that we continue this discussion at the next WHCC meeting, and
invite Sharon MacDonald, the "Reduce the Use" staff person in Hopkins
Schools, to share her ideas and program with us.
Margaret made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Sandy R.
The motion was approved unanimously.
Margaret Holste, Recorder
-4096- 10/15/2003