2003-11-25PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
CITY OF MOUND COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY
NOVEMBER 25, 2003
7:30 P.M.
MOUND CITY HALL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a
single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests.
In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
PAGE
2.
3.
4.
OPEN MEETING
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS
*CONSENT AGENDA
*A.
*B.
*C.
APPROVE MINUTES:NOV 10, 2003 REGULAR MEETING
APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS
APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMENDATION
*D.
*E.
*F.
CASE #03-34: WAIVER OF PLATTING
KARY DAVIS/JASON DELARIA
4721 ABERDEEN ROAD
RECOMMEND: APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS
APPROVE POSAC RECOMMENDATION NAMING ALWIN PARK
IN LANGDON BAY
APPROVE WCA REPLACEMENT PLAN BY HENNEPIN COUNTY
FOR CSAH 15/110 REALIGNMENT
TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY
1. ACTION ON RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE RELEASE
OF TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY # 19-117-23-33-0234 TO
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS ONLY
4297-4300
4301-4322
4323-4342
4343-4345
4346-4357
4358-4368
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
10.
ACTION ON RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE RETENTION
OF TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY g 19-117-23-22-0024 FOR
WETLAND PURPOSES
4369-4378
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM
NOT ON THE AGENDA (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS
1. ACTION ADOPT1NG ORDINANCE NO. -2003 AMENDING
THE ZONING CODE TO ADD A NEW SECTION 350.1400
(ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS) TO REGULATE ADULT
ESTABLISHMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUND
4379-4398
2. ACTION ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. -2003 AMENDING 4399-4401
ZONING CODE SECTIONS 350.670 (BUSINESS AND INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICTS) AND 350.652 (PEDESTRIAN DISTRICT USES)
ADDING "ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS" AS A "PERMITED USE"
IN THE B-l, PEDESTRIAN AND I-1 DISTRICTS, SUBJECT TO THE
CRITERIA AS SET FORTH IN ZONING CODE SECTION 350.1400,
AMENDING ZONING CODE SECTION 350.670 (BUSINESS AND
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS) TO INCLUDE "ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS"
AS A "NON-ALLOWED USE" IN THE B-2 AND B-3 BUSINESS
DISTRICTS AND AMENDING ZONING CODE SECTION 350.310
(DEFINITIONS) TO ADD A DEFINITION FOR A DAY CARE
FACILITY (CHILD)
PC RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE
ACTION ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. -2003 TO APPROVE LAND USE FEES 4402-4408
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
A. ACTION AWARDING FLOORING CONTRACT, REQUESTED BY DON
GEIGER OF AMCON
4409
REPORT ON FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT (FFE) BY
FIRE CHIEF GREG PEDERSON
4410-4430
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
A. CASE #03-50: VARIANCE: SECOND STORY ADDITION / REMODEL
BRIAN AND KRIS BENIEK
6017 RIDGEWOOD RD
RECOMMEND: PENDING
4431-4457
ACTION ON RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EMINENT DOMAIN
PROCEEDINGS TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE FOR REALIGNMENT
OF COUNTY ROAD 15 AND OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES
4458-4464
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
11
ACTION ON RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HE~G
ON THE 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
4465
12.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Correspondence: LMCD 4466-4478
B. Newsletter: Hennepin County 4479-4482
C. Minutes: POSAC -Nov 13, 2003 4483-4486
D. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative 4487-4490
E. Article: Gov't reform can save only so much money 4491
F. FYI: Code Enforcement Team 4492-4496
G. Update: Skate park 4497-4500
H. Letter: Met Council 4501
I. Letter: WeCAN 4502
J. Calendar: LMCC 4503-4504
K. Report: Finance Dept - Oct 2003 4505-4507
L. Minutes: Dock and Commons 4508-4511
M. Report: Police Dept - Sept 2003 4512-4513
N.. Report: Harbor Wine and Spirits 4514
13. ADJOURN
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More
current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site.
COUNCIL BRIEFING
November 25, 2003
~U comin Events Schedule: Don't Forget~..~
Nov 25 - 7:15 - HRA regular meeting
Nov 25 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Nov 26 - 11-1:30 - Fire Commission (Mayor only)
Dec 1 - 6:30 - Special CC meeting
Dec 1 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing
Dec 8 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing continuation, if needed
Dec 9 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Dec 9 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Dec 11 - Wine Tasting benefit for Mound Fire Department at Minnetonka Mist
Dec 12 - 6:30 - City Manager's House Warming and Landmark Birthday Party
Jan 13 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Jan 13 - 7:30 - CC Annual Meeting
Jan 17 - 10:00 - Open House and Dedication of the Public Safety Facility
Upcoming Absences
Nov 22-29 David Osmek
Dec 18-19 Kandis Hanson
Personal time
Vacation
Citv Hall Closed
Nov 27-28 Thanksgiving
Dec 25-26 Christmas
#11.2004 Street Reconstruction Proiect
Jim Prosser will be present to discuss the project financing.
No other news. Have a safe and happy Thanksgiving.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 10, 2003
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular
session on Monday, November 10, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city
hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek and Peter Meyer.
Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community
Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director/Engineering Coordinator
Carlton Moore, City Engineer John Cameron, Eric Kangas, Ruth Kangas, Marilyn
Stillings, Guy Nowlan, Art Speck, Steve Hall, Cynthia Dufour, Penny Steele
Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be
routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no
separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in
normal sequence.
1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVE AGENDA
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to approve the agenda. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
Osmek requested the removal of item 4D from the consent agenda.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda as amended.
Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve minutes of October 28, 2003 regular meeting and November 6, 2003
special meeting.
B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $434,249.08.
C. RESOLUTION NO. 03-95: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN OPERATIONS
PERMIT FOR CHOICE PLASTICS, INC., TO LOCATE IN THE BALBOA
BUSINESS CENTER AND TO REMOVE THE EXTERIOR OVERHEAD DOORS
IN THE LOADING DOCK LOCATED AT 5300 SHORELINE DRIVE
D. (removed)
1
-4297-
4D.
Mound City Council Minutes - November 10, 2003
Approve payment requests:
a. Dave Perkins' Final Payment Request for 2002 Storm Sewer
Improvement Project in the amount of $6,201.76.
b. Environmental Associates Payment Request No. 2 for the Lost Lake
Greenway Project, in the amount of $180,777.78.
c. Trait Wells' Payment Request No. 2 for Municipal Well No. 8, in the
amount of $38,784.94.
d. Valley Paving Inc.'s Payment Request No. 4 for 2003 Street
Reconstruction Project, in the amount of $42,854.72.
e. Minnetonka Portable Dredging request for the Lost Lake Greenway
Project, in the amount of $4,812.50.
f. Environmental Associates, inc., request for the Lost Lake Greenway
Project, in the amount of $6,480.00.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - VARIANCE AT 2050
HARRISON LANE- MARILYN STILLINGS
Osmek stated that he requested that this item be removed from the consent agenda
because at the Planning Commission this item met significant dissenting vote as to the
approval. Discussion followed as to the feasibility of relocating the garage to reduce the
variance, and even eliminate the need for a variance. There was argument made
regarding the variance due to the layout of the lot. It is located at the corner of Breezy
Road and Harrison Lane. The variance is being requested for the Breezy Road side of
the property, which from a practical standpoint is a sideyard, but from a legal standpoint
is a frontyard. The applicant agrees to a 10' setback rather than the requested 6'.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the following resolution as
amended. Osmek disapproves the approval because he believes that the garage could
be relocated 5' away from the house, thus negating the need for any variance. The
following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Meyer. The following voted against:
Osmek. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-96: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD SETBACK
VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE AT 2050
HARRISON LANE. P&Z CASE #03-43. PID #13-117-24-32-0037.
It is suggested that the Planning Commission review the section of the city code that
addresses setbacks on corner lots.
5. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT
ON THE AGENDA
None were offered.
2
-4298-
Mound City Council Minutes - November 10, 2003
6. UPDATE ON THE WESTLAKE REGION FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMISSIONER PENNY STEELE, WITH QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM
THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE PUBLIC
Penny Steele appeared before the Council with an update on various projects and
programs that Hennepin County is involved in that affect the City of Mound. She
discussed the CSAH 15/110 project, Emergency Preparedness, Environmental
Services, the Water Patrol, Environmental Health, and the Department of Homeland
Security's Capability Assessment.
Tim Turnbull, Emergency Preparedness Director, commended the City of Mound on
their Emergency Preparedness Program.
7. ACTION ON RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONSTRUCTION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CSAH 15/110.
Guy Nowlan of Hennepin County appeared to request approval of the Construction
Cooperative Agreement for the CSAH 15/110 project.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-97: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR
THE NEW ALIGNMENT OF CSAH 15/110 (County Project No. 9417 - Agreement
No. PW-45-06-03)
8. ACTION ON RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON 2004
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
John Cameron distributed maps showing the proposed 2004 Street Reconstruction
Project. He stated that the preliminary estimated cost for this project is $1.7 million.
He stated that the feasibility report will break down specific areas so that parts can be
eliminated down the road if determined the project is too large for one year. He will also
be meeting with Jim Prosser of Ehlers & Associates within the next week to determine
the financial feasibility of the project.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-98: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT
ON 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
3
-4299-
Mound City Council Minutes- November 10, 2003
9, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT: ADULT USE
ESTABLISHMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT(S)
Sarah Smith informed the Council that adoption of an ordinance providing for the
regulation of adult establishments will be coming before them via public hearing at their
meeting of November 25. No action is necessary, but the item was included to provide
for review prior to the public hearing.
10. ACTION ON RESOLUTION AMENDING FEE SCHEDULE
It was noted that the only proposed change to the fee schedule provides for a
Quarantine Fee for animal control.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 03-99: RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE
11. ACTION ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
Hanus requested that future changes to the Administrative Code be discussed prior to
adoption in a workshop setting.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to approve the revised Administrative Code,
dated November 10, 2003, as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
12. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
J.
K.
L.
M.
Letter: Grant notice for County 15 realignment
Newsletter: Metropolitan Council
Newsletter: Gillespie Center
Report: Harbor Wine and Spirits
Customer response on fees
Press release on Medica rebate
Newsletter: the Brimeyer Group
Update: Outlot Turnover - Village by the Bay
Report: Expense report on Longpre building
Letter: Chrissy Weber and Georgie Engstrand
Hennepin County notice on Winter Hazard Awareness Week
Update: Public Safety facility
Correspondence: LMCD
13. ADJOURN
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn the meeting at 9:35 p.m. All voted
in favor. Motion carried.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor pat Meisel
4
-4300-
NOVEMBER 25~ 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
110503S U E $1,149.64 OCT
111903SU E$1,736.62 OCT
111203SUE $1,321.00 OCT
112503SUE $844,832.96OCT
TOTAL
$849,040.22
-4301 -
CITY OF MOUND
Batch Name 110503SUE
Payments
City of Mound ~ 1/07/03 8:03 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: November 2003
User Dollar Amt $1,149.64
Computer Dollar Amt $1.149.64
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 110503 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-02-03 THRU 10-17-03
Invoice 110503
Transaction Date 11/4/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
$484.96
Total $484.96
Refer 110503 PETTYCASH
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $270.24
Invoice 110503
Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $50.75
Invoice 110503 11/4/2003 PO 17705
Transaction Date 11/4/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $320.99
Refer 110503 WIDMER, DENICE
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $343.69
Invoice 110503 11/3/2003
Transaction Date 11/3/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $343.69
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND $613.93
496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG $484.96
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $50.75
$1,149.64
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$1,149.64
$1,149.64
-4302-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound 11/12/03 3:32 PM
Page 1
Payments
Batch Name 111203SUE
Payments
Current Period: November 2003
User Dollar Amt $1,321.00
Computer Dollar Amt $1,321.00
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 111203 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREN T
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION BECK MANAGEMENT
Invoice 111203 PO 17873
Transaction Date 11/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 111203 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA ClITES
Cash Payment E 101-41110-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 111293 10/17/2003
Transaction Date 11/12/2003
$180.00
Total $180.00
2003 REGIONAL MEETING REGISTRATION
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$30.00
$30.00
Refer 112003 MCKINLEY, JOHN
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $1,000.00
Invoice 112003
Transaction Date 11/12/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 000.00
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $111.00
Invoice 111203
ransaction Date 11/12/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111,00
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND $1,321.00
$1,321.00
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$1,321.00
$1,321.00
-43O3-
CITY OF MOUND
Batch Name
112503SUE
Payments
Refer 112503 3D SPECIALTIES
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: November 2003
User Dollar Amt $844,832.96
Computer Dollar Amt $844,832.96
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms JACKET
Invoice 414721 11/7/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo
$0.00 In Balance
$123.77
10100 Total $123.77
Refer 112503 3M COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials RED ELECTRONIC FILM $575.10
Invoice TP53490 11/7/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials WHITE ROLLS $114.24
Invoice TP63496 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies TAPE $360.82
Invoice CG45925 10/22/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials RED ELECTRONIC FILM $33.64
Invoice TP53490
Transaction Date 11/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,083.80
Refer 112503 A+ CLEANING CONTRACTORS, IN
Cash Payment E 101-41910.460 Janitorial Services 11-03 CLEANING SERVICE $1,260.96
Invoice 9845 11/1/2003
Transaction Date 11/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,260.96
Refer 112503 AAA NURSERY AND LANDSCAPIN
Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material DIRT $262.50
Invoice 112503 10/25/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials DIRT $262.50
Invoice 112503 10/25/2003
Transaction Date 11/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $525.00
Refer 112503 ACTION RADIO AND COMMUNICA
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AMBER LENSES $26.63
Invoice 112503 11/6/2003 PO 17867
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26.63
Refer 112503 ALLIED MECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $81,748.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $81,748.00
Refer 112503 AMCON
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $24,854.98
Invoice 2481 10/31/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24,854.98
Refer 112503 ANOKA TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs CAR/FLAMABLE LIQUIDS CLASS $~:50.00
Invoice 00032736 11/6/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00
Refer 112503 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM/CE
-4304-
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 2
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $18.36
Invoice 463331509 11/11/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18.36
Refer 112503 ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS, I
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies FINGERPRINT INK $95.50
Invoice F03-333091 10/31/2003 PO 17876
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wetls Fargo 10100 Total $95.50
Refer 112503 ASPEN EMBROIDERYAND DESIG
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDER JACKET $35.15
Invoice 112503 11/6/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.15
Refer 112503 ASPEN EQUIPMENT
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts BEARINGS $182.92
Invoice 870952 11/12/2003 PO 17990
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BEARING $93.95
Invoice 870951 11/4/2003 PO 17988
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $276.87
Refer 112503 BALBOA CENTER LIMITED PARTN
Cash Payment E 496-46580-412 Building Rentals 12-03 FIRE STATION TEMPORARY $4,357.75
nvoice 112503
ction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,357.75
Refer 112503 BELLBOY CORPORA TION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $458.05
Invoice 27908700 11/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,002.80
Invoice 27846800 11/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS $191.21
Invoice 37752700 11/14/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,652.06
Refer 112503 BREWER, MARK AND BARB
Cash Payment G 101-22955 5994 Chestnut Road, Drivew REIMBURSE ESCROW ACCOUNT $1,500.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,500.00
Refer 112503 BRW ENTERPRISES
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $192.00
Invoice 9791 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $120.00
Invoice 9810 11/10/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $312.00
Refer 112~03 BRYAN ROCK pRoDUcTS
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials RIP RAP, SCREENED CLEAN $1,493.82
Invoice 1096 11/15/2003
ransaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,493.82
I~ROf;~ i"i ~;°~ B uiI-~iNG ~TERIAL"~L'~Y, i~c
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $2,773.00
Invoice 112503
-4305-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 11/18/2003
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: November 2003
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,773.00
Refer 112503 CARGIL SALT DIVISION
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials BULK SALT $574.39
Invoice 861906 11/7/2003 PO 17984
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials BULK SALT $2,043.60
Invoice 856334 10/31/2003 PO 17984
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,617.99
Refer 112503 CASEY, JAMES
Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels REIMBURE GASOLINE $20.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00
Refer 112503 CEILINGS AND FLOORS, INCORP
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $13,915.00
invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,915.00
Refer 112503 CENTERPOINT ENERGY' (MINNEG
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 09-18-03 THRU 10-20-03 #543-000-053-000 $69.60
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 09-18-03THRU 10-20-03 #543-001-095-800 $119.35
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 09-18-03 THRU 10-20-03 #543-001-833-500 $37.05
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 09-18-03 THRU 10-20-03 #543-001-853-000 $337.06
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 09-18-03 THRU 10-20-03 #543-001-972-603 $26.94
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 09-18-03 THRU 10-20-03 #543-001-972-603 $14.70
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 09-18-03 THRU 10-20-03 #543-001-972-603 $19.59
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/12/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $624.29
Refer 112503 CHAMPION AUTO
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies MINIATURE BULBS $13.40
Invoice D223301 10/1/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies MINIATURE BULBS $18.59
Invoice D223664 10/2/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies MINIATURE BULBS $18.32
Invoice D22381X 10/4/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies SPARK PLUG $3.60
Invoice D225064 10/11/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies BATTERY,MINIATURE LAMP $278.85
Invoice D227792 10/25/2003
Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair MINI BRUSH, DUST COVER $16.68
Invoice D228586 10/30/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $349.44
Refer 112503 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST
-4306-
City of Mound 1 /20/03 2:00 PM
Page 4
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: November 2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $74.00
Invoice 61356187 11/13/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $74.00
Refer 112503 COMPUTER CHEQUE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 10-03 CHECK VERIFICATION $54.50
Invoice 106851003 11/1/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 10-03 CHECK VERIFICATION $54.50
Invoice 10685 11/1/2003
Transaction Date 11118/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.00
Refer 112503 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY, INCOR
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $7,330.00
Invoice 112593
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,330.00
Refer 112503 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment' E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 10-03 COPY MACHINE MAINTENANCE $340.80
Invoice 41050 11/7/2003
Transaction Date 11/12/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $340.80
Refer 112503 CRETE WORKS, INCORPORA TED
Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic LYNWOOD SIDEWALK $630.00
nvoice 112503 11/14/2003
action Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.00
Refer 112503 CRYSTEEL DISTRIBUTING, INC.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA REAR HINGE $6,507.87
Invoice F16941 11/13/2003 PO 17902
Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA DUMP BOXES $6,365.98
Invoice F16944 10/24/2003 PO 17902
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,873.85
Refer 112503 DALCO ROOFING AND SHEET ME
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $13,281.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,281,00
Refer 112503 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $630.00
Invoice 242375 11/18/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $52.20
Invoice 241717 11/11/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,437.10
Invoice 241700 11/11/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,119.30
Refer 112503 DETERMAN BROWNIE, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic REMOVE SLUDGE FROM OIL TANK $539.50
Invoice 251799-B
OransactionDate 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$539.50
Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 11-03 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $8,075.25
invoice 5850 11/4/2003
-4307-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 11/17/2003
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 5
Payments
Current Period: November 2003
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,075.25
Refer 112503 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,753.05
Invoice 220598 11/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,575.95
Invoice 220517 11/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $84.00
Invoice 41461 11/13/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,413.00
Refer 112503 EMPIREHOUSE, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-31 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $17,628.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $17,628.00
Refer 112503 ERICKSON ELLISON AND ASSOCI
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 CTY 15 LIGHTING $865.35
Invoice 0310050 10/31/2003 Project 05252.
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $865.35
Refer 112503 EXPRESS POLICY SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA TRAFFIC EMERGENCY LIGHT $184.98
Invoice 0019146-1N 10/16/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $184.98
Refer 112503 EXTREME BEVERAGE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00
Invoice 160626 11/12/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.00
Refer 112503 FRONTIER/CITIZENS OOMMUNICA
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-03 472-3555 $251.69
Invoice 112503 11/10/2003
Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 10-03 472-0646 $19.63
Invoice 112503 11/10/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $271.32
Refer 112503 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-11-03 UNIFORMS $31.66
Invoice 745939
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-11-03 UNIFORMS $31,66
Invoice 745939
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-11-03 UNIFORMS $31,65
Invoice 745939
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 11-11-03 MATS $27.41
Invoice 745939
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 11-11-03 MATS $27,41
Invoice 745939
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 11-11-03 MATS $27.41
Invoice 745939
Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 11-11-03 MATS $54.42
Invoice 745940
-4308-
City of Mound /2o/o3 2:oo
Page 6
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: November 2003
Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 11-11-03 MATS $50.71
Invoice 745941
Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 11-11-03 MATS $98.27
Invoice 745942
Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 11-11-03 MATS $30.95
Invoice 745938
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-04-03 UNIFORMS $40.48
Invoice 739306
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-04-03 UNIFORMS $40.48
Invoice 739306
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-04-03 UNIFORMS $40.47
Invoice 739306
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 11-04-03 MATS $23.04
Invoice 739306
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 11-04-03 MATS $23.04
Invoice 739306
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 11-04-03 MATS $23.04
Invoice 739306
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $602.10
Refer 112503 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE
Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE REPAIR $256.39
nvoice 61559 10/21/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPLACE EXHAUST SYSTEM $1,059.09
Invoice 61520 10/17/2003
Transaction Date 11/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,315.48
Refer 112503 GIESE, LEROY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2003 BOOT ALLOWANCE $159.99
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $159.99
Refer 112503 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 10-03 #32345800 $28.76
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $28.76
Refer 112503 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 801318 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 801711 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 801591 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 801527 11/12/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,295.75
Refer 112503 HATCH, JIM SALES COMPAY
Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts CABLE $156.93
5304 11/4/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts LIGHT HEAD,CONNECTOR KITS $336.49
Invoice 5312 11/12/2003
$0.00
$947.44
$269.0O
$5,079.31
-4309-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 11/12/2003
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 7
Payments
Current Period: November 2003
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $493.42
Refer 112503 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID $1,331.84
Invoice 571601 11/4/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals CONTAINER CHARGE $35.00
Invoice DM96153 10/31/2003
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,366.84
Refer 112503 HEIT-Z, FRANK
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniform; 2003 BOOT ALLOWANCE $189.99
Invoice 112503 11/17/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.99
Refer 112503 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO
Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE $976.02
Invoice 23108022 10/31/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals 10-03 RADIO LEASE $1,218.26
Invoice 23108023 11/3/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,194.28
Refer 112503 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 13-117-24-23-0053 CONVEYANCE DEED $26.70
FILING
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 1111412003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26.70
Refer 112503 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $496.85
Invoice 318376 11/18/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750~252 Beer For Resale BEER $358.60
Invoice 318556 11/18/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $855.45
Refer 112503 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I
Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $8,249.32
Invoice 110603-A 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE $5,951.O0
Invoice 110603-B 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS $2,321.13
Invoice 110603-C1 11/6/2003
Cash Payment G 101-22960 Langdon Trail Plat #03-33 Pr 10-03 LANGDON TRAIL DEVELOPMENT $400.00
AGREEMENT
Invoice 110603-C2 11/6/2003
Cash Payment G 101-22960 Langdon Trail Plat #03-33 Pr 10-03 LANGDON TRAIL DEVELOPMENT $1,200.O0
AGREEMENT
Invoice 110603-D 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 MOUND VISIONS $1,403.00
Invoice 110603-E 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 TIF RELATED WORK $1,248.24
Invoice 110603-F 11/6/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20,772.69
Refer 112503 HOME DEPOT/GECF
-4310-
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
//t/~ ....... ~-~'~_~ Payments Page8
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply FENCE WOOD $314.66
10/24/2003 PO 17980
11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $314.66
Refer 112503 HOMEBASE OFFICE FURNITURE, I
Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LOCKING PENCIL DRAWER $43.11
Invoice 571
Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LOCKING PENCIL DRAWER $43.11
Invoice 571
Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LOCKING PENCIL DRAWER $43.11
Invoice 571
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $t29.33
Refer 112503 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM 0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts BATTERIES $61.70
Invoice 133845 11/4/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.70
Refer 112503 lOS CAPITAL
Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying 11-09-03 THRU 02-08-04 MAINTENANCE $138.40
Invoice 60403517
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $138.40
112503 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC
Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair BULBS $34.89
Invoice 0001843 11/14/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $34.89
Refer 112503 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,306.56
Invoice 1639353 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $513.48
Invoice 1639354 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $299.17
Invoice 1639355 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $848.25
Invoice 1639356 11/12/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,967.46
Refer 112503 KELLEHER CONSTRUCTION, INCO
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $90,441.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $90,441.00
Cash Payment E 496-46580~500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $4,449.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,449.00
Refer 112503 LAKEMINNETONKA COMM. COM
Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs PUBLIC ACCESS FEE $10,785.93
112503
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,785.93
Refer 112503 LAKER/PIONEER NEWSPAPER
-4311-
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
/ --~ ~ Payments
CiTY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice OOX14
Transaction Date
E 609-49750-340 Advertising THANKSGIVING INSERT $331.50
11/1/2003
11/i2/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $331.50
Refer 112503 L.ARSON, LOREN
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts TIMBERS $100.00
invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00
Refer 112503 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 RepaidMaint Supply MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $172.17
Invoice 1404340 10/28/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $172.17
invoice 1404340 10/28/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $172.16
Invoice 1404340 10/28/2003
Transaction Date 11/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $516.50
Refer 112503 LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts THROTTLE CABLE $6.97
Invoice 050647 9/18/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6.97
Refer 112503 MARK WI DISTRIBUTOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $32.00
Invoice 606510 11/18/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $85.80
Invoice 606409 11/18/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $820.50
Invoice 606408 11/18/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $804.65
Invoice 604096 11/11/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $37.15
Invoice 604097 11/11/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Rear 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 13820
Cash Payment
Invoice 13832
Cash Payment
Invoice 13851
Cash Payment
Invoice 13861
Cash Payment
Invoice 13882
Cash Payment
Invoice 13891
Cash Payment
Invoice 13911
Cash Payment
Invoice 13922
MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY
E 609-49750-265 Freight
10/16/2003
E 609-49750-265 Freight
10/20/2003
E 609-49750-265 Freight
10123/2003
E 609-49750-265 Freight
10/27/2003
E 609-49750-265 Freight
10/30/2003
E 609-49750-265 Freight
11/3/2003
E 609-49750-265 Freight
11/6/2003
E 609-49750-265 Freight
11/10/2003
10-16-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
10-20-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
10-23-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
10-27-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
10-30-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
11-03-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
11-06-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
11-10-03 DELIVERY CHARGE
$1,780.10
$171.90
$5.40
$171.00
$10.80
$124.20
$19.00
$124.20
$8.10
-4312-
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
/t ..~ Payments
/
_j_ ~
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 13944
Transaction Date
E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-13-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $214.20
11/13/2003
11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $848.80
Refer
Cash Payment
Invoice 45628
Cash Payment
Invoice 45629
Cash Payment
Invoice 45630
Cash Payment
Invoice 45631
Cash Payment
Invoice 45632~A
Cash Payment
Invoice 45632-B
Cash Payment
Invoice 45633
Cash Payment
Invoice 45634
~,ash Payment
nvoice 45635
Cash Payment
Invoice 45636
Cash Payment
Invoice 45637
Cash Payment
Invoice 45638
Cash Payment
Invoice 45639
Cash Payment
Invoice 45640
Cash Payment
Invoice 45641
Cash Payment
Invoice 45642
Cash Payment
Invoice 45643
Cash Payment
Invoice 45644
Cash Payment
Invoice 45645
Cash Payment
Invoice 45646
Cash Payment
Invoice 45647
:ash Payment
45648
Cash Payment
Invoice 45649
112503 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI
E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 601.49400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64
11/1/2003
E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 455.46377-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi
11/1/2003
E 455-43255-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 101-41500-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 281-45210-300 Professional Srvs
11/t/2003
10-03 MISC ENGINEERING
10-03 MISC ENGINEERING
10-03 MISC ENGINEERING
10-03 MISC ENGINEERING
10-03 MISC ENGINEERING
10-03 MISC ENGINEERING
Project 07827
Project 08901
Project 08902
Project 08903
Project 08904
Project 08904
10-03 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT
Project 12252
10-03 CTY RDY 15 REALIGNMENT
Project 12533
10-03 DOWNTOWN TIF DISTRICT
Project 12534
10-03 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT
Project 12754
10-03 MCES LIFT STATION
Project 13132
10-03 XCEL SUB-STATION
Project 13190
10-03 SKATE PARK
10-03 DOCK LOCATION MAP
G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 10-03 WELL/PUMPHOUSE
11/1/2003
E 455.46380-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance
11/1/2003
G 101-22910 WCA Bartlett Violation
11/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
Project 13207
Project 13223
Project 13313
10-03 LONGPRE BLDG DEMO
Project 13314
10-03 6384 WALNUT MEYER GRADING
Project 13488
10-03 LOST LAKE GREENWAY
Project 13566
10-03 STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT
Project 13677
10-03 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT
Project 13681
10-03 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE
Project 13832
10-03 SEREMPA WETLAND
Project 13946
10-03 TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY
Project 14000
$220.40
$1,339.00
$51.5O
$799.00
$156.25
$156.25
$103.00
$4,886.00
$51.50
$154.50
$206.00
$51.5o
$27.O0
$71.00
$3,519.00
$220.40
$154.50
$15,450.80
$174.30
$432.50
$321.50
$166.00
$103.00
-4313-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 45650-A
Cash Payment
Invoice 45650-B
Cash Payment
invoice 45651
Cash Payment
Invoice 45652
Cash Payment
Invoice 45653
Cash Payment
Invoice 45654
City of Mound
Payments
11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 11
Cash Payment
Invoice 45655
Cash Payment
Invoice 45656
Cash Payment
Invoice 45657
Cash Payment
Invoice 45658
Cash Payment
Invoice 45659
Transaction Date
10-03 CITY UTILITY MAP UPDATE
Project 14103
10-03 CITY UTILITY MAP UPDATE
Project 14103
10-03 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Project 14121
10-03 NPDES PHASE II MS5 PERMITTING
Project 14137
10-03 2241 SOUTHVIEW #03-10
Project 14275
10-03 1861 COMMERCE WETLAND
Project 14354
E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
G 101-22931 2241 Southview Ln,03-10 W
11/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
$9.90
$9.90
$6,718.20
$71.00
$1,3O9.3O
$309.00
$206.00
$51.5o
$751.00
$618.00
$534.20
G 101-22950 4721 Aberdeen Rd. #03-34 S 10-03 4721 ABERDEEN #03-34
Project 14459
10-03 2684 WILSHIRE #03-42
Project 14549
10-03 GROVE LANE WATER QUALITY STUDY
Project 14603
10-03 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Project 14615
10-03 LOST LAKE DREDGING
Project 14618
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
11/1/2003
E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs
11/1/2003
11/18/2003
$39,402.9O
Refer 112503 MES - SNYDER, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts BATTERY $43.45
Invoice 059916 3/13/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts BULB $8.00
Invoice 064268 4/29/2002
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51.45
Refer 112503 METRO FIRE
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies COMPONENTS $10.32
Invoice 14585 10/14/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies CALIBRATION CYLINDER $88.87
Invoice 14547 10/7/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies COMPONENTS $783.07
Invoice 14585
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $882.26
Refer 112503 METRO SYSTEMS
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SPECIAL ORDER FABRIC $282.44
Invoice 32158 11/3/2003 PO 17972
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $282.44
Refer 112503 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENWR
Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste Disposal-MCIS 12-03 WASTEWATER $48,806.33
Invoice 00000764814 11/7/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $46,806.33
Refer 112503 MICHAEL, GEOFF
Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SOFTWARE PACKAGE $83.65
Invoice 630 11/12/2003 PO 17989
-4314-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 630
Cash Payment
Invoice 630
Transaction Date
City of Mound 1/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 12
Payments
E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SOFTWARE PACKAGE $83.65
11/12/2003 PO 17989
E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SOFTWARE PACKAGE $83.66
11/12/2003 PO 18989
11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.96
Refer 112503 MONROE TRUCK EQUIPMENT
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts SWITCH
Invoice 769353 11/5/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BEARING
Invoice 768656 11/3/2003
Transaction Date 11/14/2003
Refer 112503 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date
E 222-42260-185 Fire-Maintenance Pay
E 222.42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries
$27.84
$87.46
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115.30
10-03 DRILLS
10-03 MAINTENANCE
10-03 MONTHLY SALARY
$854.00
$1,210.00
$5,220.00
Total $7,284.00
$743.75
11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
R;f~r ~'12503 M'O~ MA~ETPi_'ACELLC
E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 11-03 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $743.75
Refer 112503 MOUND, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities 10-03 WATER/SEWER $20.23
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.23
Refer 112503 MUNTI-OGLE COMPANY, INCORP
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $12,289.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,289.00
Refer 112503 MYERS, TONY
Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURE EMT EXAM FEE $60.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.00
Refer 112503 NATIONAL WATERWORKS
Cash Payment E 60%49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SPLICE CONNECTOR,ETC $1,442.55
Invoice 9924584 11/12/2003
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,442.65
Refer 112503 NELSON, JOYCE
Cash Payment E 670-49500-331 Use of personal auto REIMBURSE MILEAGE $25.55
Invoice 112503 11/7/2003
Date 11/12/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.55
Refer 112503 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (FIRE
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-18-03 THRU 11-19-03 CELL PHONES $95.53
Invoice 112503
-4315-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 11/18/2003
City of Mound
Payments
11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 13
Current Period: November 2003
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.53
Refer 112503 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLAENOUS EQUIPMENT $378.97
Invoice 08939746 10/28/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts AUGER $108.60
Invoice 8940957 10/29/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450,221 Equipment Pads HITCH PIN $21.26
Invoice 08999966 11/6/2003
Transaction Date 11/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $508.83
Refer 112503 NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INCORPO
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $44,683.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $44.683.00
Refer 112503 NRG PROCESSING SOLLUTIONS L
Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10-03 BRUSH SERVICE $70.00
Invoice 11152
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.00
Refer 112503 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO
Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 10-03 LOCATES $143.38
Invoice 3100553 10/31/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 10-03 LOCATES $143,37
Invoice 3100553 10/31/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $286.75
Refer 112503 PALM, MICHAEL
Cash Payment E 222-42260-217 Fire Prevention Supplies REIMBURSE FIRE VIDEO'S $20.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00
Refer 112503 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1.401.81
Invoice 8020626 11/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $325.00
Invoice 8019860 11/7/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $819.58
invoice 8019925 11/10/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $38.00
Invoice 8020408 11/13/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT--WINE -$21.34
Invoice 8020238 11/12/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2.563.05
Refer 112503 PEDERSON, GREG
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA REIMBURSE PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT $1,001,85
Invoice 112503 Project 063003
Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies REIMBURSE CITYHALL EQUIPMENT $70.97
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,072.82
Refer 112503 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
-4316-
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa CREDIT-MIX -$36.30
Invoice 49244527 11/7/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $85.94
Invoice 49244532 11/10/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $49.64
Refer 112503 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE -$16.56
Invoice 3289021 11/11/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $33.75
Invoice 2009547 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $128.35
Invoice 2009545 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,601.35
Invoice 2009546 11/12/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,746.89
Refer 112503 PLUNKETT'S, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic OCT NOV DEC PEST CONTROL $95.84
Invoice 990675 11/1/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.84
112503 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS
Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,069.61
Invoice 332093-00 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$18.87
Invoice 325280-00 10/28/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,069.61
Invoice 332098-00 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $881.89
Invoice 332288-00 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $50.24
Invoice 331903-00 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $84.80
Invoice 331904-00 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $124.46
Invoice 332140-00 11/12/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,261.74
Refer 112503 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings REPLACE BALLASTS $1,425.00
Invoice 112503 11/13/2003 PO 17983
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,425.00
Refer i 12503
REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AIR AND OXYGEN $22.45
Invoice R10031063 10/31/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.45
{efer 112503 RIDGEDALEELECTRIC
Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-31 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $119,149.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $119,149.00
-4317-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 15
Current Period: November 2003
Refer 112503 RIDGEVIEW BUSINESS HEALTH
Cash Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical Services
invoice 112503 9/19/2003
Cash Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical Services
Invoice 112503 11/17/2003
Transaction Date 11/18/2003
MYERS, TONY TEST AND READ
VACCINE MCCARVILLE
Wells Fargo 10100
$22.00
$77.00
Total $99.00
Refer 112503 ROSEMOUNT, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101-43100~433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP $50.00
Invoice 112503 11/25/2003
Transaction Date 11/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00
Refer 112503 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPOR
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $6,264.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,264.00
Refer 112503 SIGNCAD SYSTEMS, INC.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials CUTTER HOLDER ASSEMBLEY $105.85
Invoice 100947 11/10/2003
Transaction Date 11/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.85
Refer 112503 SOS PRINTING
Cash Payment E 222-42260-350 Printing LAMINATED SHEETS $35.76
Invoice 64981 10/20/2003
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.76
Refer 112503 SPECIALTY SYSTEMS, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 10-31 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $31,730.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31,730.00
Refer 112503 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $8,137.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,137.00
Refer 112503 ST, JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INCORP
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery END EDGE, CAPSCREW,ETC $722.13
Invoice Sl23750 11/3/2003 PO 17986
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $722.13
Refer 112503 STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INCOR
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $13,300.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,300.00
Refer 112503 STRAUGHAN HARDWARE, INCOR
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $27,342.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $27,342.00
Refer 112503 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts TIRES FOR #18 $236.88
Invoice 10017472 10/28/2003
-4318-
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 11/12/2003
City of Mound 11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 16
Payments
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $236.88
Refer 112503 T-RAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 3083 HIGHLAND LIFT STATION
Invoice 112503 10/15/2003
Transaction Date 11/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 112503 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 316145 11/17/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 316143 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 316142 11/12/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 30029 11/17/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,218.20
Refer 112503 THURK BROTHERS CHEVROLET
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BEZEL-PUB $10.15
Invoice 51383 11/7/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.15
112503 THURNBECK STELEL FABRICATIO
Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $10,418.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,418.00
Refer 112503 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts DEMURRAGE CHARGES $18.14
Invoice 432103 10/31/2003
Transaction Date 11/1412003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18.14
Refer 112503 TRI-STATE PUMP AND CONTOL, I
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply WEAR RING, FITTING, ETC $1,014.10
Invoice 22801 11/13/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA DUPLEX CONTROL PANEL $17,475.59
Invoice 22801 11/12/2003 PO 17909
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18,489.69
$1,765.00
Total $1,765.00
$496.00
$6,194.20
$3O.OO
$498.00
Refer 112503 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies CREDIT-INK JET CARTRIDGE -$36.21
Invoice 407739-0
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $95.82
Invoice 407739-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies CALENDAR $8.87
Invoice 409171-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies CALENDAR $8.87
Invoice 409171-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies CALENDAR $8.87
~voice 409171-0
Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies BINDERS/FOLDERS $6.56
Invoice 408475-0
-4319-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 17
Cash Payment E 60%49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 408475-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 408475-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
invoice 408396-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 407855-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 407998-0
Transaction Date 11/20/2003
BINDERS/FOLDERS
BINDERS/FOLDERS
PLANNER,ETC
EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS
CARTRIDGE TAPES
Wells Fargo 10100
$6.56
$6.55
$136.92
$7.63
$78.51
Total $328,95
Refer 112503 V & S JEWELERS
Cash Payment E 10t-42110-431 Meeting Expense ENGRAVE PLATE $162.68
Invoice 112503 PO 17860
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $162.68
Refer 112503 VEIT AND COMPANY, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $27,274.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $27,274.00
Refer 112503 WAGERS BUSINESS SYSTEMS, IN
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies FAX MACHINE SUPPLIES $237.57
Invoice ARIN018829 10/15/2003 PO 17864
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $237.57
Refer 112503 WALDRON, PAUL A. AND ASSOCIA
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 BUILDING INSPECTIONS $980.00
Invoice 112503 10/31/2003
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $980.00
Refer 112503 WATERTOWN PARTS CENTER
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts OIL FILTERS $80.06
Invoice 358433 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts OIL FILTERS $80.06
Invoice 358433 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts OIL FILTERS $80.07
Invoice 358433 11/6/2003
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials OXYGEN $5.58
Invoice 357848 10/29/2003 PO 17985
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials OXYGEN $5.58
Invoice 357848 10/29/2003 PO 17985
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials OXYGEN $5.59
Invoice 357848 10/29/2003 PO 17985
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $256.94
Refer 112503 WESTERN STEEL ERECTION, INC
Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $12,446.00
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date 11/18/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,446.00
Refer 112503 WESTONKA MECHANICAL
-4320-
C~TY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 29853
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page t 8
E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 2210 SOUTHVIEW SERVICE CALL $63.70
11/5/2003
11/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63.70
Refer 112503 WlDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cash Payment
Invoice 186
Cash Payment
Invoice 177
Cash Payment
Invoice 163
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2624 WILSHIRE DUG CURB
11/10/2003
E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic CULVERTS BAYSIDE/CAMBRIDGE
11/4/2003
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WATERMAIN BREAK
10/23/2003
Cash Payment
Invoice 167
Cash Payment
Invoice 166
Cash Payment
Invoice 165
Transaction Date
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract CURB STOP
10/23/2003
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract CURBSTOP GATE VALVE
10/23/20O3
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WATERMAIN REPAIR
10/23/2003
11/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
'ransaction Date 11/18/2003
Refer 112503 WlNKLER, BOB
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
Invoice 112503 10/31/2003
Transaction Date 11/12/2003
Refer 112503 WORLD CLASS WINES, INCORPO
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 142576 11/6/2003
Transaction Date 11/20/2003 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 112503 XCEL ENERGY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
:ash Payment
112503
Cash Payment
invoice 112503
WILKIE SANDERSON
E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 10-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities
E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities
E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities
E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities
E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities
E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities
E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities
E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities
Wells Fargo 10100
BANKFILL, CONCRETE
Wells Fargo 10100
WINE
10-03 STREET LIGHTING
10-03 #2245-301-939
10-03 #0466-607-223
10-03 #0217-606-329
10-03 #0047-005-229
10-03 #0864-508-832
10-03 #0864-508-832
10-03 #0864-508-832
10-03 #0018-802-634
$942.5O
$2,550.00
$652.50
$580.00
$1,160.00
$585.00
Total $6,470.00
$10,066.00
Total $10,066.00
$3,578.16
Total $3,578.16
$347.00
Total $347.00
$5,1t5~01
$1,031.50
$21.99
$2,451.32
$178.31
$109.42
$109.42
$109.42
$1,355.59
-4321 -
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 112503
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
11/20/03 2:00 PM
Page 19
Current Period: November 2003
E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 10-03 #0009-604-835 $316.31
11/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,798.29
Refer 112503 ZACK, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies BRUSH TIP HANDLES $85.10
Invoice 24557 11/13/2003
Transaction Date 11/19/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85.10
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
455 TIF 1-2
496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$61,907.59
$11,206.37
$71.00
$31,790.92
$14,882.99
$585,160.02
$15,159.64
$71,618.00
$40,971.83
$8,710.30
$3,354.30
$844,832.96
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$844,832.96
$844,832.96
-4322-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: November 19, 2003
SUBJECT: Waiver of platting to combine and subdivide Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 5,
Devon, Hennepin County, MN.
APPLICANTS: Kary Davis and Jason Delaria
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 03-34
LOCATION: 4721 Aberdeen Road
PID: 30-117-23-22-0033 / 30-117-23-22-0034
ZONING: R-2 Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
REQUEST
The City Council will consider a request from Kary Davis and Jason Delaria, for waiver
of platting approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to combine and subdivide
Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 5, Devon, Hennepin County in order to create a new
"buildable" parcel which would consist of Lots 4 and 5.
SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Chapter 330:12 states that any parcel of land, either platted or unplatted that
has been combined for tax purposes or other reasons, cannot be re-separated or
divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of the
subdivision ordinance. A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City
Council after receipt of the background information provided by City staff.
The waiver of platting and release of the tax combination may be approved if it is
determined to be in compliance with all City codes. The City may impose conditions to
the waiver. Applications for waiver of platting do not require review by the Planning
Commission. However, if it so desires, the City Council may remand the application to
the Planning Commission if it determines that their advice will be helpful in determining
if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives.
-4323-
If the application for a waiver of platting request requires any variance from any City
code requirement, the waiver application must be processed in accordance with City
Code Section 330:170 and shall be referred to the Planning Commission and
processed as any other variance request under the subdivision ordinance.
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
Ownership. Kary Davis purchased the property located at 4721 Aberdeen Road
which consists of three (3) platted lots in 2002. Additionally, Ms. Davis and Jason
Delaria purchased the adjacent lot to the north (Lot 4) shortly thereafter. They are
proposing to combine and subdivide the (4) lots in order to create an additional new lot
which would consist of Lot 4 and Lot 5.
Certificate of Survey. A Certificate of Survey for the subject property dated June,
2003 and revised on June 20, 2003, July 31, 2003 and September 4, 2003 respectively
was prepared by Advance Surveying and Engineering Company and has been included
as an attachment. While no construction is contemplated as a part of the current
waiver of platting request, the applicant(s) have demonstrated a building pad on Lots 4
and 5 which meets the requirements of the R-2 District. It is City staff's understanding
that the proposed new tot is to be sold for single-family development if the waiver is
approved.
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map included in the Mound
Comprehensive Plan guides the property for future Iow-density residential use (1-6
units / acre.)
Adjacent Land Uses. The subject property is surrounded on all sides by residential
use.
Zoning. The subject property is zoned R-2 single family residential. The following
table includes the lot area, width and setback requirements of the R-2 District:
Lot Area Width Depth Front Side Setback(s) Rear
Setback Setback
R-2 6,000 SF 40 FT 80 FT 20 FT 10 FT 15 FT
Lots4and5 6,400SF 80FT 80FT 30.1 15FT/12FT 17FT
Lots6and7 6,400SF 80FT 80FT 28.9 11.5FT / 8FT* 15FT
*NOTE: The minimum side setback for a detached accessory dwelling in the R-2 District is (6) feet
therefore the garage is in a conforming location on Lots $ & 7.
-4324-
Non-Lot of Record Status. In the event the waiver of platting request is approved, the
subject property will lose its "lot of record" status and therefore will be subject to the
standard provisions of the R-2 zoning district. As previously mentioned, the side
setback (principal structure) for non-lots of record is ten (10) feet. Additionally,
hardcover is limited to no more than thirty (30) percent.
MEETING OVERVIEW
The application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 15, 2003,
October 6, 2003 and October 20, 2003 meetings.
As the original application also included a request for a hardcover variance, review by
the Planning Commission was required as set forth in City Code Section 330:12.
Members of the City Council are advised that the variance application was
subsequently withdrawn as the applicants reduced the size of the "western driveway"
to meet the 30 percent hardcover restriction.
The majority of discussion at the Planning Commission level focused on grading
improvements that are needed on the property located at 4714 Hanover Road which is
owned by Leif and Jenny Skogsberg. The purpose for the grading improvements is to
accommodate drainage for the new lot on Aberdeen Road as well as to improve
neighborhood drainage. Additionally, the need for an easement or declaration over
the Skogsberg property to address the maintenance issues was also discussed as it
was included as a condition for approval by the City Engineer.
Details regarding the Planning Commission's review are contained in the meeting
minutes excerpts which have been included as attachments.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend
Council approval of the waiver of platting application from Kary Davis and Jason
Delaria for Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 5, Devon, to create a new "buildable" parcel which
would consist of Lots 4 and 5. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's
recommendation has been included for review.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Timeline for Council Action. The waiver application was submitted and deemed to be
complete on August 4, 2003. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute Section 462. 358.
Subd. 3b, the City has 120 days to approve or disapprove subdivision. Therefore, the
last day the City Council can take action is on or before December 2, 2003. As the
application also previously included a variance which is subject to the timelines
established in MS.S. 15, 2003, the City executed a 60-day extension on September
September 30, 2003.
-4325-
Drainage Easement. At the October 20, 2003 meeting, the use of a recordable
declaration as opposed to an easement was viewed as a possible alternative by the
Skogsbergs as they were concerned that a permanent easement would hinder their
opportunity to expand their home on the west side. The Skogsbergs also asked if the
City Engineer could evaluate whether the proposed swale could be shifted closer to the
property lines to preserve the buildable space.
Swale Relocation. Staff met with Jason Delaria and Leif and Jenny Skogsberg on
November 18,2003 to discuss an alternate plan to relocate the swale within the 6-foot
side and 15-foot rear setback area. As previously discussed, the subject area is high
and narrow along the west line therefore the swale cannot be accomplished without the
construction of a retaining wall along the west line.
As the swale / retaining wall alternative was viewed as a "permanent" solution to the
drainage problem and was located within the principal structure rear and side setback
areas, all parties agreed that this was the preferred alternative and that the proposed
drainage improvements would be best accommodated by a utility easement in favor of
the City of Mound versus the previously discussed declaration. Staff has prepared a
drainage easement (draft) for the proposed improvements that is currently under review
by the Skogsbergs.
4
-4326-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 03-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE REQUEST FROM KARY DAVIS AND JASON
DELARIA FOR WAIVER OF PLATTING APPROVAL PURSUANT TO CITY
CODE SECTION 330.12 TO COMBINE AND SUBDIVIDE LOTS 4, 5, 6 AND 7,
BLOCK 5, DEVON, HENNEPIN COUNTY
PLANNING CASE # 03-34
PID # 30-117-23-22-0033
PID # 30-117-23-22-0034
WHEREAS, the applicants, Kary Davis and Jason Delaria, have submitted
a request for waiver of platting approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to
combine and subdivide Lots 4, 5, (5 and 7, Block 5, Devon, Hennepin County;
and
WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows: the
PID No. 30-117-22-23-0033
PID No. 30-117-23-22-0034
Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 5, Devon
Lot 4, Block 5, Devon
and;
WHEREAS, there is an existing house and detached garage located on
Lots 5 and 6 and the applicants have proposed to create a new "buildable" parcel
which would consist of Lots 4 and 5; and
-4327-
WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-2 single family
residential subject to the standards as set forth in City Code Section 350:630;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed new lots to be created meet the requirements
of the R-2 District for "non-lots of record"; and
WHEREAS, Lots 5, 6, and 7 are existing platted lots and were
combined previously by a former owner; and
WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 330:12 states that a waiver of platting
request may be granted by the City Council if it is determined that the proposal is
in compliance with all City codes; and
WHEREAS, the waiver of platting request was reviewed by the
Planning Commission at its September 15, 2003, October 6, 2003 and October
20, 2003 meetings and was unanimously recommended for approval as
recommended by Staff subject to conditions.
THEREFORE, BE IT 'RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City
of Mound, Minnesota as follows:
1. The City does hereby approve the waiver of platting request subject to the
following conditions:
so
Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated
with the land use request that shall be paid prior to the release of
the resolution. If appropriate, an additional escrow deposit may
also be required to cover any forthcoming costs associated with the
preparation of the Declaration / easement documents.
No future approval of any development plans and/or building
permits is included as parts of this land use action in the event the
waiver of platting request is approved.
c. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon
submittal of the building permit applications, when appropriate.
Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all
public agency permits including the submittal of all required
information prior to building permit issuance.
e. All conditions from the City Engineer as referenced in his report
dated September 10, 2003.
-4328-
f. One (1) park dedication fee in the amount of $1100.00 shall be
paid.
A drainage and utility easement for the property located at 4714
Hanover Road shall be prepared by Staff and executed by Leif and
Jenny Skogsberg. The fees for preparation of the easement shall
be the responsibility of the applicants. The resolution for the
waiver shall not be released for recording until such time as the
proposed grading activities have been completed and accepted by
the City Engineer and the easement is signed unless an escrow
deposit or other acceptable financial guarantee (ie. letter of credit)
in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer shall be
submitted.
2. This waiver of platting request is hereby approved for the following
described property:
Existing
Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 5, Devon
Lot 4, Block 5, Devon
Proposed
Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Devon
Lots 4 and 5, Block 5, Devon
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
seconded by Councilmember
and
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted November 25, 2003
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-4329-
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 20, 2003
BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE #03-34 WAIVER OF PLATTING AND HARDCOVER VARIANCE
CONTINUED FROM 10/6/03 MEETING
4721 ABERDEEN ROAD - KARY DAVIS AND JASON DELARIA
The Planning Commission tabled this application due to the uncertain status of the easement
issue between the applicants and the owners of the 4714 Hanover Road property regarding the
proposed grading improvements..
The City Engineer and City Attorney have proposed an alternative to the utility easement. It
provides for the preparation of a recordable Declaration for the property which would
acknowledge the purpose of the drainage improvements (swale) and establish minimum
standards for maintenance but would also allow for building additions subject to the regulations
in the City Code. In the event a future addition would impact the swale, an acceptable
alternative would need to be developed to maintain drainage prior to building permit issuance.
City staff has preliminarily
discussed the Declaration option with the adjacent property owners. They believe this may be a
viable option.
The City Engineer should evaluate whether the swale can be shifted closer to the property line(s).
If the Declaration is favorably received, the City Engineer will require implementation of the
proposed grading activities prior to the release of the resolution for the waiver, if approved.
The declaration would provide easement would provide for future adjustments could be made.
Ayaz asked if both parties have come to an agreement?
Betty Diehl (applicant's parents) indicated that Kary and Jason were comfortable with this
approach.
Leif Skogsberg, 4714 Hanover Road asked if it would be recorded on the neighbor's lot as well
as theirs? He felt both parties should have to abide by the document, not just them. He wanted
to discuss this with his wife before making a final decision.
Smith asked Skogsberg about the timing of the grading. She indicated that the city would prefer
that the grading be done immediately. However, it could be deferred with an escrow deposit to
insure completion to everyone's satisfaction. .~
Skogsberg asked about the possibility of keeping the sWale in the setback area. Cameron said
that the property to the west is too high and the grading could not be accomplished in that narrow
of an area. As long as we could build in the future and the property owners to the north are
-4330-
Planning Commission Minutes
October 6, 2003
of the situation before doing any alterations.
Osmek thought the stipulations address all these concerns very well.
Smith said there were two time line options. The subdivision needs to be acted on before
December 2, 2003. There is enough time to bring it back to the Planning Commission and then
to the Council before that deadline. She indicated it was up to the Planning Commission how
they wanted to handle it.
MOTION by Raines, seconded by Schwingler, to recommend approval of the variance pending
acceptance of the declaration by both parties. MOTION carried unanimously.
-4331 -
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 6, 2003
5. BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE #03-34 WAIVER OF PLATTING AND HARDCOVER VARIANCE
CONTINUED FROM 9/15/03 MEETING
4721 ABERDEEN ROAD - KARY DAVIS AND JASON DELARIA
At its September 15, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a request from the
applicants to combine and subdivide Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 5, Devon, in order to create a new
buildable parcel that would consist of Lots 4 and 5. The applicants also requested variance
approval to exceed the 30 percent hardcover restriction on Lots 6 and 7 that includes the existing
house and detached garage, as it will become non-conforming if the waiver is approved and the
property loses its "lot of record" status.
The Planning Commission tabled the application to allow the applicant time to contact the
adjacent property owner to the south regarding grading activities on their property that will be
necessary to accommodate drainage in the subject area and also requested that the applicants
minimize the amount ofhardcover to the full extent possible for consistency with the 30%
allowance. Members of the Planning Commission also requested that City staff determine
whether or not easements should be required for the project.
Applicant has removed hardcover. The applicant has approached the adjacent property owner
regarding the easements needed.
Staff recommends approval of the waiver of platting subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request.
2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of
this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved.
3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building
permit applications, when appropriate.
4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all public agency permits
including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance.
5. All conditions from the City Engineer as referenced in his report dated September 10, 2003.
6. If the resolution is released prior to the installation of municipal utilities and other related
work, a utility escrow deposit or other acceptable financial guarantee (i.e. letter of credit) in
an amount to be determined by the City Engineer shall be submitted.
7. One park dedication fee in the amount orS1,100.00 shall be paid.
8. A private utility easement over the property located at 4714 Hanover Road shall be obtained
by the applicant and provided in proper form to allow for recording at Hennepin County a
-4332-
copy of which shall be provided to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to
recording activities. The resolution shall not be released until such time as the applicant has
provided evidence that the private utility easement has been filed at Hennepin County.
Discussion
Smith advised that the applicant had withdrawn the variance application.
Mueller indicated that field verification and/or revised survey with the new hardcover would be
good.
Lee and Jennifer Skogsberg- 4714 Hanover Rd - Questioned the drainage easement and its affect
on the future use of their property. Smith said that areas that are trapping water would be
improved. The easement will be an area that is dedicated to the drainage swale needed to draw
the water in the appropriate direction. Area will need to remain free and clear, no permanent
structures or trees/shrubs in that area. Depending on depth of swale (this one appears fairly
shallow) you may not even see it. If the property owner wanted to expand into that area any
alterations would need to meet the easement setback and/or regrading would need to occur to
facilitate the free flow of water with that change. The City Engineer feels that the grading
proposed should significantly enhance the drainage to your benefit.
Jennifer was concerned about the fact that they don't have a garage and may impact their ability
to build one or sell the property.
Mueller asked about setbacks. Smith and Gordon said garage setbacks in the rear would be 4
feet, 4 feet from side. It would be difficult to build a double garage on the east side.
Mueller advised that there will be some benefit to the property but would also be a detriment
because it affects the ability to use the property fully. Without the easement there is no
protection should a house be erected on Lots 4 and 5.
Ayaz felt that if it were constructed correctly an easement wouldn't be necessary. Then, if the
house is built on Lots 4 and 5 we could address it at that time.
Mueller thought that the City Engineer stated that the waiver is subject to a correct drainage
situation. The Engineer has never brought anything up unless he felt it was important. If we
allow the subdivision without an easement for drainage on the neighbor's lot, what is to stop the
Building Official from issuing a permit. Smith said that every single-family application goes to
the City Engineer for review, which includes drainage issues.
Mueller thought we shouldn't wait until the building permit application is brought in. The City
Engineer feels that the easement should be in place now. Ayaz thought that the property owners
should negotiate an agreement. It should not be initiated by the city.
Jason Delaria indicated that they have done everything that the City Engineer wanted. What else
can be done? Kary Davis asked if it could be corrected now and any future changes flag another
-4333-
drainage review.
Ayaz thought that, if the neighbors are in agreement and could convince the City Engineer that
an easement wasn't necessary it wouldn't be required.
Smith said that the Engineer and City Attorney have indicated that the best way for the City to
insure protection for future owners is the execution of an easement. She indicated that Staff
would research if there were other options available which would address this matter.
MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Osmek, to table the application. MOTION carried
unanimously.
-4334-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 15~ 2003
5. BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE 03-34 Waiver of Platting and Hardcover Variance
4721 Aberdeen Road -Kary Davis and Jason Delaria
The subject property includes 4 lots on Aberdeen Road. Three are grouped under one PID; one
lot is on its own. The owners want to combine the 2 PIDs and then split them into 2 lots equal in
size for single-family home use. They have made improvements to the property, including a
detached garage. If subdivided, the property loses the lot of record status and the hardcover limit
goes from 40 to 30 percent. Current hardcover is attributed to the house, garage and 2
driveways. Once divided, the existing house lot would be over the 30% hardcover limit. The
City Engineer indicated a need to address the drainage impact on the adjoining properties. In
general, the lots are conforming in size and setbacks. Staff has difficulty with the 2 driveways.
Hardship is difficult to establish. Staff recommends removal ora portion of the existing
driveways to eliminate the need for the hardcover variance.
Discussion
Mueller wanted to know if the City Engineer indicated a need for permanent drainage.
The applicants explained that the existing curb cuts are one of the reasons they want to keep the
extra drive. The drive originally went all the way around the back of the house. They removed a
lot of that. They pointed out that the use of Class 5 doesn't displace water quite the way concrete
or bituminous does.
Mueller observed that the actual hardcover would be about 17% over. It is a problem to require
a future builder to contact neighbors regarding drainage swale agreement. He will be
recommending that agreement be in place befbre approving the division.
Michael asked Muelter, if the agreement was in place and the hardcover was not an issue, would
he be in favor of the division? Mueller felt there was no problem with that at all. It would clean
up a junk lot that's been an eyesore for a long time.
Muelter told the applicants that the Planning Commission is considering tabling action until the
agreement is in place and the hardcover is dealt with.
Jason Delaria said they decided to keep the driveway on the west because of the doorway on that
side of the house. Access would be easier. Street parking is not widely available. Ot, her
neighbors are using their grass for additional parking. It doesn't look good. If the hardcover is
cut down to the 30% there might not be room for another car to park.
-4335-
Mueller said that if access to the door on the west is a problem the commission is open to a
sidewalk option.
MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Raines, to table action until a drainage agreement is in place
with the neighbor that specifically addresses the request of the engineer for drainage to the south,
and removal of some hardcover to come as close to the required 30% as possible.
MOTION carried unanimously.
-4336-
,CITY OF MOUND
534! Mayw(]od Rom.i, Mouud, MN 5364
Phone 952-472-0600 FAX, 952-472-0620
WAIVER PLATTING
APPLICATION
Escrow Deposit:$200.%
Fee: $50 Case
City CoUncil Dat
..... Please type or print clearly
INFO
EXISTING Lot(s)
LEGAL
PROPOSED A. LOt(S)___~__[
LEGAL
ZONING Circle: R-1 R-lA ~ R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
DISTRICT
PROPERTY Are there existing structures on the property? ~ / no
Do the existing structures comply with the zoning ordinance for setbacks, hardcover, etc,? ~ / no
APPLICANT The applicant is: ~owner otl~er;
OWNER Name
(If other than
applicant) AddreSS
Phone (I-.I) __(W). .(M)
I fas an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property?
( ) yes, (/,~ .no. If yes, list date(s) of applicat on, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
Application nlust be signed by _all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this Is not the case,
I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true
and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read ail of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by ti~e
City related to file processing of this application consent to the entry in or upon the prernises described in this application by any
inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be
authorized official of the City of Mound for the I)urpose or
required by taw.
Signature~
· Applicant
RevJ. sad 03./16/03
-4337-
18/82/2883 0G:28 9529498991 KARY DAVIS PAGE 82
...... ~ ...... (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
LOT AREA ~ SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .......................................
LC,T AP, EA SQ. FT. X ~% = (for Lots of Record) .............................
HARDCOVER CALCULAT'IONS
E,isting Lots of Record may have 40 Percenl em/arage provided that techniques are utilized, as oatli~ed In Zoning Ordinance Section 3,50:1225. Subd,
(see back). A Pien must be submi~fe~ and approved by the Building Official
HOLJSE
DEi'ACHED BUILDINGS
(GARAG~SHED)
LENGTH WIDTH SQFT
?'4,, 5- X 1&.5- = ~
TOTAL HOUSE
DRP/EWAY, PARKING
ARJ!AS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC..
DEC:KS Open decks (1/4" min.
Opening between boards.) with a
perviaus sur,'a~ under are not
counlpd as hardcaver.
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ...............................
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................
X ~
X ~
X ~
TOTAL DECK
TOTAl_ OTHER
TOT~LL HARDCOV'ER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ...................................................
UNDI!!R / OVER (indicate difference] ....................................................................
-4338-
PropOSed lop of Foundation
Proposed Top Of Garage Floor
Proposed Top of Low Floor
965..9
956.2
GRAPHIC 'SCALE
l 'Ab'erdeen
X 968. 9 ~X 964. 0 X 962.
S 89'36'22'
Road
967.
'96~.0
I
Sp#! Line
967. 5
S~ory Fram
Floor 969. I
965. 7
965. 6
969. 5~
I X96ZO \ .
969. 6 95~. 8
X981.8
Proposed
Driveway
EXS. SERV1CE~
X 961. 7
X962.6
· 2 0% 985. l
~ ~/A~= ,01.9ix.os2.$
)(962.2
x
XgS?.Y
X961.$
962. 7
x
X
I
-4339-
ME M 0 R A ND UM
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2003
TO: SARAH SMITH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECT( }R
FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: CITY OF MOUND
DAVIS/DELARIA WAIVER OF PLATTING, CASE NO. 03-34
4721 ABERDEEN ROAD
MFRA File No. 14459
As requested, we reviewed the Davis/Delaria Waiver of Platting request and have the following
comments and recommendat~ions:
Comments:
1. The property has both sanitary sewer and water services in-place to the property line.
There is a shallow low area located on the rear property line of lot 5, which presently drains to
Aberdeen Road. Placement of a structure on this parcel would block this drainage and could
cause water problems for the neighbor to the south. The applicant has revised the survey to show
some regrading of the rear and side yards of the property to the south, to allow runoffto be
directed to the storm sewer in Hanover Road.
o
Recent revisions to the City Code requires that sanitary sewer and watermain trunk charges, in
addition to the connection fees must be paid on new building sites. The present trunk charges are
$1500 each for sanitary sewer and water and a connection fee of $240 each for the sewer and
water services for the newly created building site.
This is one of the older plats in the City, which did not provide drainage easements along the lot
lines. Therefore, drainage and utility easements should be provided along all new lot lines, on..
both parcels, 10 feet wide on the street side and along the rear lot line and 5 feet on the sides.
Recommendations:
o
Any approval should includ~'a condition that the proposed grading on the
adjacent property, as shown on the survey, be required as part of any future
building permit. This condition should be recorded against the new parcel
created by the Waiver of Platting.
2. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Area Trunk Charges of $1500 each shall be
paid whe~ application is made tbr a building permit on the new parcel.
Provide drainage and utility easements along all new lot lines of both
parcels, five (5) i~et in width on the side lot lines and ten (10) feet in width
along the fi'ont and rear lot lines. The easements, to be provided by the
applicants, will need to be submitted in document t'orm so as to allow tbr
recording at Hennepin County concurrently with the waiver of' platting
resolution. The document(s) shall be subject lo review and approval by the
City Engineer prior to the release or'the
-4340-
89/22/2883 2B:3S 9529490Bgl KARY DAVIS PAGE 82
Property owners of 472] Aberdeen Road. Kary Davis and ~'ason Delaria, to perform grading on
our property, 47]4 Hanover Road. as set ~brth by the Engineer for the City of Mound, .lohn
Cameron.
Grading activities will be paid for by Kary Davis and Jason Delaria an.d completed by
Signed.
dayof ~'~ ~ '2003.
-4341 -
DRAFT
EASEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made this __ day of ,20__,
between Leif Skogsberg and Jennifer Skogsberg, husband and wife, parties of the first part, and
the CITY OF MOUND, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, party
of the second part.
WITNESSETH: That the parties of the first part in consideration of the sum of ONE
DOLLAR AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION to them in hand paid
by said party of the second part, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant
and convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assigns, the following:
A permanent easement for utility and drainage purposes over, under, and across the
westerly and northerly 6.0 feet of the following described property:
Lot 16, Block 5, Devon
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said parties have hereunto set their hands the day and
year first above written.
Leif Skogsberg, husband
Jennifer Skogsberg, wife
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
On this __ day of ,20 , before me, a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared Leif Skogsberg and Jennifer Skogsberg,
husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed.
Notary Public
This instrument drafted by:
Affecting Certificate No..
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
State Deed Tax Due Hereon: None
-4342-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound,com
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent
November 14, 2003
Naming of the Park at Langdon Bay/Rottlund Development
At the November 13, 2003 Park and Open Space Advisory Commission meeting, a
decision was made to name the new park in the Langdon Bay, Rottlund
Development, Alwin Park. POSAC has requested that this be put on the Consent
Agenda for the December 9, 2003 City Council Meeting. Copies of the minutes and
the Criteria for Establishing the Name of Park Facilities in the City of Mound are
attached.
Pending Council approval, a dedication ceremony will be planned for the spring of
2004.
l printed on recycled paper
-4343-
Taylor explained that commissioners were to bring their ideas for naming the new
park at the Langdon Bay/Rottlund development. Motion by Hostetler to name the
Park, Langdon Bay Park. Second by Motyka. Discussion followed in which
Brown suggested naming it Alwin Park since Alwin was such a huge contributor
to this development and the park. Further discussion followed. Taylor pointed out
that there was already a name on the table. Langdon Bay Park was put to a vote,
with 4 opposed and 3 in favor. Motion failed.
Motion by Brown to name the park, Alwin Park. Second by Beise. No discussion.
Alwin Park was put to a vote, with 4 in favor, 3 opposed. Motion carried.
Proposed park name will be sent to the City Council for apP.[oval.
8. Discuss: Park Tours
Beise recommended revisiting the parks after they?~; aii ;~'e[. up in the spring.
Beise algo recommended that POSAC begin setting,a repl~nt timetable for
equipment so it can become Part of the budget Process. Facki'~gggested adding
another column to the-current replacement'schedule that would ~i~,for
replacement of playground equipment ~:¢'~ry year b~ginning in 20~i;ii:i}~i?'?
Brown suggested bonding, if allowable, and dedicating a portion to parks.
Discussion followed. Brown ~ade a motion to addlo the General Obligation
Bonds an amount to be determi~d¢~ibut no less thafii~'100,000.00 to be used for
parks. Second by Beise with the a fid ent that the ~'h~3 be deposited in the
Park Dedication Fund for future p~k pr°j~¢t~ilDiscussl;n followed. Brown will
present this issue Council. M:~tioti"Carried'! ??'
9. Discuss: .
Widmer had
numerous fundraiSing ideas for POSAC consideration.
Taylor asked ~.a list?0f projects and decide which ones they
C°Uncilfor consideration in 2004.
W~ was,i~sked to do research on this item. Beise was asked to
approach the Chamber on sponsoring an even within the City of
Mou~ and donating part of the profits to parks.
~si!~h the Park .
presented this idea and Hostetler expressed a desire to be
?;a participant in this even though his term as commissioner is up at
the end of the year.
Antique Boat Show
It was determined that Todd Warner would be approached about
doing a scaled down version of this at a future date.
Pull-tabs
It was decided that Taylor would approach the VFW and request
that they consider donating 2% of their profits to parks. The
Legion and Lions also need to be approached regarding this.
-4344-
CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING THE NAME OF
PARK....FAOILITIES IN..T'HE OITYDF MOUND,, MINNESOT'A
', ...,:. ... ~ ~'~.
The purpose for these criteria is to establish a Procedure for the naming and
approving of Park and Recreation Facilities with the City of Mound.
Contribufor. Tlfii~"c~h be an individual or. organization t~at has contributed financially
to the abquisition and/or d~vel0P~nent of the Park and Recreati0h S~,st~rri.
Location, The name shot~ld fit the neighb0th:6od.
A Famous American or Prominent Citizen. Recognition shall not be considered until
termination of service or death.
Occasion. A special event in history.
Serv]eb.. An'i'ndividual living or dead who has signifiCanfiy'"served the community
above and beyond the call of duty.
CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING THE FACILITIES WITi-:i THE' PARK AND
MEMORIALS FOR THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA.
FACILITIES WITHIN THE PARK
Facilities within a park can be named for an individual or organization who has
donated funds for the construction of the facility or has contributed service to the
community; Examples of such facilities would include:
Athletic Fields
Tehnis O6Urts
Swim Pools
Ice Arena
Golf Course
Buildings
Wild ,Life Area
The percentage of donation should be 50% of the estimated cost of the facility when
new, not' including cost of the land.
If an individual has contributed at least 10 years of service to recreation in the City.
and a period of at least two years has passed from the termination of service or the
death' of the iii'dit/idd~il Wh'ibhe~er Cb'He's fi~'s~i then th~ Pa~'k ann"Open Space AdviSory
Commission may c0. nsider the renaming of a facility within a Park. ' ....
-4345-
Engineering · Planning* Surveying
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 13, 2003
TO:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:
Kelly J Bopray, LPSS
SUBJECT:
Hennepin County Transportation Department
CSAH 15 and 110 Wetland Replacement Plan
Mound, Minnesota
MFRA #12533
The Hennepin County Transportation Department applied to the City of Mound as the Local Unit of
Government for a WCA replacement plan approval for the CSAH 15 and 110 realignment project.
The Hennepin County Transportation Department proposes to realign CSAH 15 to improve public
safety. The realignment will eliminate one of the two current intersections of CSAH 15 and 110.
About 900 feet of CSAH 110 and 2,700 feet of CSAH 15 will be reconstructed. Wetland sequencing
discussions were provided in the application. A total of 9,854 square feet of wetland will be
impacted by the project. Wetland impacts have been limited to 193 square feet of wetlands adjacent
to Lost Lake (DNR #143) and 9,661 square feet in three ditches along the railroad track and Belmont
Lane. Hennepin County Transportation Department indicates the proposed work qualifies as minor
or emergency maintenance work impacting less than 10,000 square feet of wetland and banking
through the Board of Soil and Water Recourses will provide replacement.
The City put the plan on notice on October 23, 2003 as required by the WCA and no comments were
received. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) members were contacted but a TEP meeting was
not requested. A copy of the following documents were submitted to the City for its files:
Wetland Delineation Report, prepared by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. (MFRA),
dated 1/15/03.
WCA Application to City, DNR, BWSR and Corps of Engineers, prepared by Hennepin
County Department of Environmental Services, dated 10/13/03.
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota ° 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com
-4346-
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
November 13, 2003
Page 2
· Copy of the Notice of Application, prepared by MFRA, dated 10/23/03.
· LGU determination of complete application, completed by MFRA, dated 10/23/03.
· Sequencing findings of fact, completed by MFRA, dated 11/12/03.
· Replacement Plan Findings and Decision, completed by MFRA, dated 11/12/03.
MFRA recommends the City approve the replacement plan with the following conditions:
· Best Management Practices be implemented for the duration of the project.
s:XrnainAmou 12533~correspondence~mayor&cotmcil
-4347-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 03-__
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT
WETLANDS REPLACEMENT PLAN APPLICATION IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE CSAH 151110 REALIGNMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the applicant, City of Mound, has submitted a Wetlands Replacement Plan
Application with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) in order to facilitate
the realignment of CSAH 15/110 project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mound, as the Local Government Unit (LGU), has the authority
under the WCA to determine if an application is consistent with the intent and provisions
of the act; and
WHEREAS, the staff and the applicant, with the assistance and input of the Technical
Evaluation Panel (TEP), have conducted a thorough review of the applicable City and
WCA regulations with respect to the proposal and found it to be in substantial
compliance with the WCA,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City does hereby grant approval of the WCA permit as recommended by
staff with the following condition:
Best Management Practices shall be adhered to for the duration of the project.
Adopted by the City Council this __ day of
.,2003.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-4348-
Project Name G.~. rcd
Project Location
Date Replacement Plan Complete: xoi~.~lo'~
Date by Which Replacement Plan Decision Must be Made
Sequencine Process (8420.0520)
No
[] Has a "Sequencing Findings fFact been completed. (If "No," do not proceed with this
O " 9
checklist until a "Sequencing Findings of Fact' has been completed.)
[~ [] Are the sequencing requirements met by the proposed project? (Attach a copy of the
"Sequencing Findings of Fact")
***If the sequencing requirements are not met, the permit cannot be approved. ***
Replacement Plan Evaluation (8420.0540-8420.0549)
Yes No
Wetland Repl
Yes No
Sequencing completed
Evaluation of Functions and Values completed (replacement and impacted wetland)
Goal of replacement plan is clearly stated and measurable
Type o£Replacement identified (i.e., restoration, creation, banking)
Proposed action is eligible to serve as replacement
Size of replacement is sufficient
Timing of replacement is concurrent with or prior to impact
Location of replacement is acceptable
The requirements and special considerations listed in 8420.0547
and 8.420.0548 have been considered
tcement Standards (8420.0550)
Will the replacement plan adequately replace the functions and public values lost at the impact site?
Are the replacement plan goals supported by plan specifications?
Is a control structure involved and does it need a dam safety permit by MDNR?
Does the control structure meet the specifications of the Minnesota Wetland Restoration Guide?
Are site perimeter Best Management Practices (BMPs) included in the plan?
Does the replacement plan discuss revegetation by seeding or planting?
Have reasonable steps to control invasion by exotic species been included?
Is an erosion control plan included?
Is placement of organic substrate necessary?
Are there sideslopes of 5:1 or greater in created wetlands and graded portions of buffers?
Is there an undulating bottom in created Types 3, 4, and 5?
Does the created wetland have an irregular edge?
***If any of the above items are checked "No," the WCA requirements have not been met
and the replacement plan cannot be approved. ***
Wetland Replacement Decisions and Findines
Yes No
[~ [] Can the replacement plan be approved?
List findings to support the approval or denial of the replacement plan:
Page 1 of 2
BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_7(Replac_Plan_Findings)
(April 2003)
-4349-
Replacement Plan Approval
Note: This section follows review of a COMPLETE replacement plan application. If any of the items below
are checked "No", the replacement plan approval may not be finalized, and no work may begin on the project
until this information is submitted.
Yes No N/A
Has evidence of title for land containing replacement wetland been reviewed?
Has proof of recording of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for replacement
wetland been received?
Has completed Application for Withdrawal of Wetland Credits been received?
Has a Contractor Responsibility and Landowner Statement Form been completed?
******Within 10 days of decision, Notice of Decision must be mailed. ******
Page 2 of 2
BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_7(Replac_Plan_Findings)
(April 2003)
-4350-
Date: ttl~
Project Name or Number: ¢o.I~1,
Location of Project: ~,o ~.~
I. DETERMINATION OF IMPACT AVOIDANCE
1) Is the project wetland dependent?
[] yes
LGU: ~&
LGU contact: \~-~'\~,~, MF~t~
Sec. Twp. Range
[~o (If yes, proceed to Item II of this form)
2) Has the applicant provided~umentation describing at least 2 good faith alternatives that would avoid
wetland impacts? (e.g.~2b~j~, alternate sites, alternate project confi-~tions)
[~'yes [-'] no (If no, then sequencing reauirements are not met and the permit cannot be approved)
3) Have all feasible and prudent alternatives that would avoid impacts to wetlands been considered?
[~yes [] no (If no, then sequencing requirements are not met and the permit cannot be approved)
II. DETERMINATION OF IMPACT MINIMIZATION (8420.0520, Subp. 4)
1) Has the applicant sufficiently demonstrated efforts to minimize impacts to wetlands by considering the
following?
W/Spatial requirements of the project ~-~' Individual and cumulative impacts
Ir'Locations of existing structural or natural features v('Alternative project configurations
Ir/'Project purpose relative to the proposed impacts ,-~Site constraints
~r Confining impacts to the fringe of the wetland(s) ~"Site design relative to natural features
~Value, function, and distribution of wetlands on the site v~Others as necessary
~yes [] no (If no, then the LGU shall notify the applicant in writing of its objections to the project. If the application is not
withdrawn or modified to satisfy the LGU's objections within 30 days, then the statement of objection shall
constitute a denial of the application.)
III. DETERMINATION OF IMPACT RECTIFICATION (8420.0520, Subp. 5)
1) Has the applicant proposed to repair, rehabilitate, or restore to pre-project conditions any temporary impacts
associated with the project?
[] yes [] no [~I~/A (If no, then sequencing requirements are not met and the permit cannot be approved)
IV. DETERMINATION OF REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION OF IMPACTS OVER TIME (8420.0520,
Subp. 6)
1) Will additional wetland impacts be reduced or eliminated by maintaining, operating, and managing the project
in a manner that preserves and maintains the remaining wetland functions and values?
[~es [] no (If no, then sequencing requirements are not met and the permit cannot be approved)
V. UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS (8420.0520, Subp. 7)
1) Will unavoidable wetland impacts be replaced in accordance with M.R. 8420.0530 to 8420.0630?
[~yes [] no (If no, then sequencing requirements are not met and the permit cannot be approved)
VI. SEQUENCING FLEXIBILITY (8420.0520, Subp. 7a)
1) Has sequencing flexibility been requested?
[] yes [~no (If yes, explain compliance with MN Rule 8420.0520, Subp. 7a)
Explanation:__
2) Will the proposed replacement wetland provide equal or greater functions and values than the impact wetland?
[~'yes [] no (If no, then sequencing flexibility cannot be implemented)
, gd on the information above, is sequencing adequately addressed?
Y~N O
Authg/rizedg/6 1~ D :/e///2./03
Page 1 of 1
BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_10(Seq_FOF) -4351 - (December 2002)
Project Name C...
Project Location
Date Replacement Plan Submitted:
Initial Contact With Pro]eot Proponent (8420.0510)
Yes No
[~ ['-It Pre-application meeting
[] [~ Site Visit (including other agencies)
[] []~]' Evaluation via TEP (if deemed necessary) 14o ~,~st~
COMPLETE APPLICATION
Sequencing Analysis (8420.0520)
Yes No
Has a sequencing analysis been submitted?
Does the sequencing analysis provide two alternatives avoiding wetland impacts? (,o~a. ~Co~.
Does the analysis provide irnpact minimization?
Does the analysis provide rectification for temporary impacts?
Does the analysis provide the reduction or elimination of impacts over time?
Replacement Plan Components (8420.0530)
Yes No
~ [] Minnesota Local/State/Federal Application Form for Water/Wetland Projects
~1~ [] Postal address of applicant(s)
[~ [] If Company, name of principle Officers, parent companies, owners/partners, subsidiaries,
managing agents, involved consultants
[] ~al,~ [] Statement of replacement prior to or concurrent with impact
[~ [] Recent aerial photo or accurate map of impact site
~' [] Location of impact by County, watershed, and quarter section
~ [] Size of impacted wetland and replacement wetland
~ [] Wetland Type (circular #39 or Cowardin)
[~ [] List of dominant vegetation at impact and replacement site
[] [] Soils map showing substrate and type for impact and replacement site (where available)
[~ [] Location of inlets into and outlets from both the impacted and replacement wetlands
[~ [] Nature of proposal, areal extent, with detailed description of impacts
[~ [] Evidence of ownership or fights to affected areas, incl. legal description
[~ [] List of all other local, state, and federal permits required
[] ~,l[& [] Scale drawings of replacement plan, profile views, and fixed photo point
[] o~ [] Statement indicating replacement wetland was not previously restored or created for other
regulatory purposes.
[] ~a]~, [] Statement indicating the replacement wetland was not drained or filled under an
exemption during previous 10 years
[] ~a[s, [] Statement indicating replacement not conducted using funds of another unless paid back
by landowner.
[] O~ [] Statement indicating replacement wetland was not restored with funds from public
conservation programs
[] ~1~, [] Monitoring plan
[] ~ [] Other information considered necessary by LGU
Note: If any of the above items are checked "No," the application is incomplete, and should not be considered for
decision by the LGU until the information is submitted. When submitted, record the date to indicate that the
replacement plan is now complete.
Date Replacement Plan Complete:
(The 60-day review period begins the day after the application is complete)
****Within I 0 days of receipt of complete application, Notice of Application must be mailed.****
Page 1 of 1
BWSR_Form_WCA_Replacement_8(Replace_Complete_App) (April 2003)
-4352-
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627
NOTICE OF WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT APPLICATION
FOR IMPACTS <10,000 SQUARE FEET
Name of Applicant: Hennepin Co. Trans. Dept.
Type of Application:
[] Exemption X Replacement Plan
[] No Loss [] Banking Plan
[] Wetland Boundary and Type
Date of Application: October 13, 2003
LocationofProject: __ofSW ofSW of 13 117 24
1/4 1/4 1/4 Sec. Twp. Range
Summary of Project: Hennepin Co. Trans. Dept. proposes to realign CSAH 15 to improve public safety. The
realignment will eliminate one of the two current intersections of CSAH 15 and 110. About 900 feet of
CSAH 110 and 2700 feet of CSAH 15 will be reconstructed. Wetland sequencing discussions were
provided in the application. A total of 9854 SF of wetland will be impacted by the project. Wetland impacts
have been limited 193 SF of wetlands adjacent to lost lake (DNR #143) and 9661 SF in three ditches along
the railroad track and Belmont Lane. Hennepin Co. Trans. Dept. indicates the proposed work qualifies as
minor or emergency maintenance work impacting less than 10,000 SF of wetland and banking though the
Board of Soil and Water Recourses will provide replacement.
List of Addressees:
Hennepin Co. Trans. Dept.
Guy Nowlan
1600 Prairie Drive
Medina, MN 55340-5421
Lynda Peterson
BWSR
One West Water Street
Suite 200
St. Paul, MN 55107
Wayne Barstad
MNDNR Ecological Services
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106
Sarah Smith
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364-1627
Ellen Sones
HC Dept. of Env. Serv.
417 N. 5th St.
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Doug Norris
MN DNR Ecological Services
500 Layfayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155
Jim Hafner
MCWD
18202 Minnetonka Blvd.
Deephaven, MN 55391
Kelly J Bopray
MFRA
15050 23ra Ave. N
Plymouth, MN 55447
Joe Yanta
Corps of Engineers
190 Fifth Street East
St. Paul, MN 55101
Summary Notice for Impacts <10,000 sq.ft. (2000)
-4353-
You are hereby notified that the above-referenced application was made to the Local Government
Unit on the date stated above. Comments on this application will be accepted until November 7~ 2003. A
decision on this matter will be made November 25, 2003 at 7:30PM at the regular City Council Meeting.
Call Kelly J Bopray at 763 476 6010 for details or changes to decision- making schedule.
Date of mailing of this Notice:
October 23, 2003
City of Mound
By: Kelly J Bopray
Title: Soil Scientist
Cc: Tony Brough, Hennepin Co. Trans. Dept.
Smranary Notice for Impacts <10,000 sq.ft. (2000)
-4354-
01:12 FAX 9524720620 CITY OF MOUND o
Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services
417 North Fifth Street 612-348-6509, Phone
Minne.apolis~ Minnesota 55401-1397 612-348-8,532, Fax
612-348-6500, Facility INFO Line
www.co,hennepin.mn.us/environmental/
envhome.html
JOHN CAMERON ~ 001
October 13th, 2003
City of Mound - Sarah Smith - LGU
5341 Maywood Kd
Mound, MN 55364-I627
BWSK Wetland Banking Admin.
1 West Water St Suite 200
St Paul, MN' 55107
BWSR - Pkil Belfiori [Board Con.)
· 1 West Water St Suite 200
St Paul, MN 55107
DNK Waters - lulie Ekman (Area Hyd.)
1200 Warner Rd
St Paul, MN 55106
Army Corp of Engineers
Attn. Joe Yanta
190 E 5th St
St Paul,.MN 55101-1638
Re:
CSAH 15 Realignment, Mound, Hennepin County- CP No. 9417.
CONTENTS "
· Public Read'Maintenance Short Form ·
· .Project Plan Sheets 1-6 (of 117).
· Wetland Delineation Report
LOCATION
The CSAH realignment is located within the City of Me,md in the SW ¼ of the SW1/4 of
Section 13, T.117 N., R.24W within Hennepin County. The project includes realigning a
portion of CSAI~: 15 (Shoreline Blvd) immediately east ofCSAH 110 (commerce Blvd).
I ,
.mmZs m d Es E . "
· Work in ?'rotected Waters (M:DNR)
· Wetland Conservation Act (City of Mound and the BWSR)
· Section'464 (U.S. Army Corps of Eng/neers)
APPLICANT
Hennepin Co. Trans. Dept.
Guy N/)wlan
1600 Prairie Drive
Medina, MN 55340-5421
· (763) 745-1652
AGENT
Department of Environment~ S~rvices
Tony Brough
401 N 5th St
Mpls, MN 55401-1397
(612) 348-4378
An Equal Opportunity Employer ' - 4355- Recycled P~, per
10/16/2003 01:12 FAX 9524720620 CITY OF MOUND ~ JOHN CAMERON ~002
DESCRIPTION/PURPOSE
This project is proposed to be advertised .for bid in December 2003; work should start
April 2003, with a completion time in June 2005. The realignment will eliminate one of
the two current int~-sections of CSAH 15 and 110. CSAH 110 will be reconstructed
from 300 feet south of CSAH 15 to 600 feet north of CSAH 15. CSAH 15 will be "
redonstmcted from 700 feet west of CSAH 110 to 2000 feet east of CSAH 110.
The purpose of the project is to realign CSAH 15 to improve public safety. Tiffs
realignment will eliminate a jog in CSAH 15, improve traffic flow, and reduce existing
cmfflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. All four approaches are being reconstructed
to provide safer access for existing and pending developments in the immediate vicinity
of the CSAH 15 - CSAH 110 intersection
SQUENCING
Alternatives ~for construction oft he project are limited.· The "no build", alternative is not
feasible because the project is necessary to correct existing safety deficiencies.
Accorcting to the City of Mmmd, there are ~xisting Conflicts between vehicles and "
pedestrians and there has been a pedestrian fatality in the past. To miniratze the wetland
impacts, alternative alignments were reviewed during the design pro6ess and retaining
walls incorporated to allow for steeper slopes.
WETLAND IMPACTS / REPLACEMENT'
Given the project scope and purpose, an individual replacement plan will not be required
by the City of Mound C~VCA), MI)NIt. (Public Waters), or USACE (Sec. 404)'. Wetland
impacts will be reported to the MN Board of Water and Soil Resourccs pursuant to
Minnesota Kule Chapter 8420.0540, Subp. 5 and Minn. Stat. 103G.222. Since the
impacts are less than 10,000 sq. ft., the PublicRoad Maintenance Short Form Notice is
utilized and attached. Below is a table summarizh~g the wetland impacts.
Summary of Wetland Impacts
. WETLAkND COWAI~IN TYPE IMPACT'S'" Comments
BASIN ,,, (Fin).
1 PEMCd ' 3 2,063 sq. ft V,g,,tation swa],-'S' 0frailroad.' '":
2 PEMC/Bdx 3 1,399 sq. t~. DitchNofrailroad, E of B¢lmontLn.
3 PBMFdx 4 6,199 sq. let. DitchNofrailroad, westofBelmontLn.
4 PElVIF 3/5 ' 193 scI. ft. ..... DNRPublicWaters-"LostLak~" #143
TOTAL: 9,854 sq. fl.
If there are any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. at 612-348-4378.
Tony Brough
Environmental'Services'
-4356-
10/15/2003 01:12 FAX 9524720620 CITY OF MOUND ~ JOHN CAMERON ~003
NA-026620-03D. (%2.Ol forPDP) 02/18/03
PART I1: PUBLIC ROAD MAINTENANCE SHORT FORM NOTICE
~or b~innesota Local/State Wetland ~rojects
plieable ONLY for project.q that qualify as either: . ,
Minor or ~merge~cy ,~aint~n .ance work impacting l~ss tha~ 10,000 square f~t of wetlandz subj~t to the Wetland Co,~servation Act, OR
) Minor or emergency rnain~zmmce work impacting los than 10,000 square f~t of cartai~ DNR Public Water W~tlands subject to ~az DI'i~ Public
Waters Work Permit Program (Lo., lt~c~se not assigned as' shore, land classification, n~t clarified as lacus~nc wetlands or d~cpwater habitat~, or
not having state or f¢~ral la~downo~hip), provided a copy of this one-page form is s~ to 6ac DNP. Waters a~a oriels; OR
3) DNR Public Water W~fland~ and wetland al~as of DlqR Public Wat~rbaains when the DNR has r~ceived a copy of the one-page Public Road
MainCmance Notice Form and h~z waived the rcquffement for a DNI~ Public Waters Work Pen'nit to either th~ LGU respons~le for thc WCA or
to tho public road aulhori~y responsible for r~porting wetland impacts to Board of Water and Soil R~sources,,OR
4) Existing public road crossings of DNR Publi~ Water~. For these cases this notice is an application for a DNR. Public Waters Permit.
IS THIS AN ORIGINAL OR AMENDED NOTICE? (check one)
~ This is an original notice, dated ~-~-o~ [] This i4 an amended notice, dated.
[~ This is an applicatioo for a DNR PUBLIC WATEKS PERMIT
1. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION:
l. PROJECT.~E~WICATION: Indicate road name an~or n~ber, te~i and project number. Also
LOCATO[ M~
3. PROJ[CT WILL ~ECT: ~ WETLA~S; ~ D~ P~LIC WATERS ~E ~ ~):
4. LOCATION OF PRO.CT ~ WETL~D (S) TO BE IMPACTED: /~ .......
S. PROJECT TIMELiEr ApproEma~, project sta~ date: ~frl ~, ~q Projected end date: ~g a l ~
6. PRO~ECT DESCRIPTION (check a~ that apply): See What To Include on Plato (Ins~c~iqns page)
~ Guardrail improv~mem ~ ~ail ~provement wffh slope flaaening
[] R. esur facing
[] Culvert extension
[] Shoulder widening
[] Slope flattening
[~ Turn lane-new constructinn
[] Other:
[] Culvert repair
[] Culvert replacement
[] Shou. ider widening with ditch grading
[] Turn lane reconstruction
[] Bridge repair or replacement on existing road
7. FOOTPRINT OF IMPACT: c~ $.~-,~ square feet of Type 5;q~ ~" wetland impacted ~g" linear feet of watercourse
~t~ ~ of DNRPubIic Waters la: OoH~
8. SIGNED AFFIRMATIONS: '
For wetland impacts: ~ I affirm that 1) steps have beenlaken to minimize the amount of wetland filling, excavating or .
draining associated with this project; 2) mitigating important site-sp%ific wetland functions on site has been considerecd,; and '.{ ~ ._.,
3) the above information' ' is true, complete and accurate to the best.of my knowledge. [~4-,;n,^~.
For DNR Public Waters impacts: [~ I am applying for state and local authorization to conduct.the work described in this
application. I am familiar with ~e information contained in this appIication.
'Signature o~ppli~ant ' ' Date
Public Road Maintenance Short Form Notice Page 1 '
.. -4357-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
FROM:
Denice Widmer, Public Works Administrative Assistant
DATE:
November 18, 2003
Resolution for the release for sale of Tax Forfeited Property # 19-117-
23-33-0234 and Resolution for retention of Tax Forfeited Property
# 19-117-23-22-0024
Hennepin County Tax Payer Services is requesting resolutions on the above Tax
Forfeited Properties by December 1, 2003. Please add them to the November 25,
2003 Council Agenda.
enc/dw
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE RELEASE OF TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY
#19-117-23-33-0234 to Abutting Property Owners Only
Applicant: Hennepin County Tax Payer Services Department
WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking the release for sale of tax forfeited property,
WHEREAS, the Parks and Open Spaces Advisory Commission considered the request
at its November 13, 2003 meeting and unanimously recommended approval of the
applicant's request with the stipulation that the property be sold and combined with
abutting property only.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the request at its November 17, 2003
meeting and unanimously recommended approval of the applicant's request with the
same stipulation.
WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of November 25,
2003.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to approve the release for sale of tax forfeited property # 19-117-23-33-0234
with the stipulation that the property be sold and combined with abutting property only.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and
seconded by Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-4359-
Release of Tax Forfeiture prope~
DATE: 10/14/2003
SUBJECT: Review and approve PID~ 19-117-23-33-0234 for either public auction, auction to
adjacent owners, or public use conveyance or nonpublic sale to the City of Mound. If the City
Council fails to respond to this notice by December 1, 2003, the sale of the lands will he deemed
approved, pursuant to M.$.282.01, Subd. 1.
APPLICANT: Hennepin County Tax Payer Services
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City
departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been
summarized below:
Sarah Smith:
Advises Planning Commission should review. Should be released
to abutting property owner only and must be combined,
John Cameron:
Can be released to abutting property owner only and must be
combined,
Greg Skinner:
No utilities. Can be released to abutting property owner only and
must be combined.
Jim Fackler:
Can be released to abutting property owner only and must be
combined. Advises POSAC should review.
PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW
Copies of the proposal were forwarded to all involved public agencies. All written
comments received to date have been included in the packet as separate attachments.
Marilyn BelL, Hennepin County Tax Forfeited Property Division:
No comment necessary at this time,
SITE INSPECTION
City Officials and Board Members are encouraged to visit the site prior to the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends releasing this property for sale to adjacent property owner and
must be combined with existing property,
-4360-
Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department
A~600 Hennepin County Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060
September 26, 2003
BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUEESTED
BONNIE RI'FFER CITY CLERK
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD RD
MOUND MN 55364
RE: Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List # 1269 C/NC
The lands as described on Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List # 1269 C)NC, were classified as either
conservation lands.or non-conservation lands, as is appropriate, by the County Auditor's Administrative Review Board.
Enclosed is a copy of County Auditor's Directive No. 2003-32 providing for the classification of the lands, under
authority granted in accordance to Minnesota Statute 282.135 by the Board of Hennepin County CommissiOners.
As uired under M.S. 282.01, the department requests that your city officials review C0nservation/EI on-Conservation
List 1269 C/NC. When municipal review has been completed, the department Will require a certified copy of a
pal resolution that resOlves and approves parcels for public auction, for- auction to adjacent owners, or requests,
public use conveyance or nonpublic sale to your city.. It should be noted that certain changes ih tax-forfeited land
procedures were made' by the 'Minnesota Legislature as part of the 2001 Tax Reform Law. See enclosed Exhibit A, an
outline for suggested points that should b8 covered in your municipal resolution,
Please be advised that the sale of the lands shall be deemed to be approved pursuant to M.S. 282.01, Subd. 1,
if the city council fails to respond to this classification notice within sixty (60~ days of receipt of certified mail.
The deadline for responding 'will be on Or about December ~, 2003.
Please contact Terry Schuhier, Property Tax Services unit leader, at (612)-348-3734 or (612)-596-6527(voice mail),
should you need further assistance or clarification.
Sincerely,
Patrick H. O'Connor, Director
Taxpayer Services Department
Jeffrey L. Strand, Supervisor
Tax-Forfeit and Property Revenue Section
PHO:JLS:tis
Enclosures
" -4361 -
An,Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper P3
Office of the County Auditor
No. 200~-32
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
COUNTY AUDITOR'S DIRECTIVE
(Tax-Forfeited Land)
To all persons interested in the lands hereinafter described:
Whereas, pursuant to legal authority as provided under Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.'i 35, the
Director of Taxpayer Services Department, acting in the capacity of Oounty Auditor-Treasurer, has
had the matter hereinafter described come before the County Auditor for admintstraUve, r'eview; and
Whereas, pursuant to the application or request for change of status of tax-forfeited land described
more fdlly below, the undersigned Deputy County Auditorfinds as follows:
1. That the Hennepin CoUnty Auditor hereby certifies the Conservation Or Non-
Conservation status and authorizes pub! c sale of all Non-Conservation Classified parcels of land on
Conservation or Non-ConserVation ClasSification List 1269 C/NC, on file with the, Hennepin County
Auditor, except where ConserVation classification s~tus is noted on said list, and further certifies
that all parcels therein have been viewed and comply win'the proVisions of'Minnesota Statutes,
Section 85.012, 92.461,: 282.01, Subd. 8, 282.018, Subd. 1,and 2821'018, Subd. 21 and Other statutes
that,require the withholding of tax-forfeited land from sale; and that the Hennepin COunty .Auditor
hereby reqUesf~ approval, where appropriate and necessary, from the Minnesota Department 0f
Natural Resources for the sale of tax-forfeited land listed on COnservation or Non-ConservaU0n
Classification .List 1269 C/NC.
september 24, 2003
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
Patrick H. o'oondor,' C~unty Auditor
ale A. Kunze
Del~)Uty COunty Auditor
-4362-
-4363-
EXHIBIT A
Outline of Suggested Points to Cover in a Governmental Subdivision
Resolution for Tax-Forfeited Lands
Municipal officials should approve the classification as Conservation and/or Non,Conservation land.
The parcels should be formally recO~ended for public auction approval, for adjacent owner auction approval if
Minnesota Statutes, section 282.0';1, ~ubd. 7a for unbuildable vacant lots is applicable, or for requesting a
conveyance for an authorized pub{lc use to your governmental subdivision, or for requesting a nonpublic sale to
your govennnental subdivision.
Upon receipt of a written application from a city or a governmental subdivision within 60 da. ys of the
classification by the county, a parcel may be withheld from auction for a time period not to exceed six months, in
accordance with Minnesota Statues, section 282.0I, Subd. 1. A city or governmental subdivision must pay
maintenance costs incurred by the county during the six-month period during which the land is with.held from
auction, provided the property is not offered for public sale after the end of the six-month period. The written
application should be in the form of a mu.*ficipal resolution requesting .acquisition and the reason for the six-
month hold.
IV. Under the Minnesota LeEislature's 2001 Tax Keform, procedures on targeted neighborhood lands were made
uniform and consistent throughout the state. Effective for deeds issued on or after August 1, 2001 the
recommendation of the County Board is ~equired for applications for conveyance of targeted neighborhood tax-
forfeited lands to be acquired for redevelopment as productive taxable property. Further, deeds of conveyance
issued under paragraph (a) of Minuesota Statutes, section 282.01, Subd. lb. are not conditioned on continued use
of the property as stated in the application. (Laws of 2001, H1 Article 3, Section 60)
¥ Each parcel should be verified as to the amount and type of special assessments shown as certified to the county
before forfeitUre. These special assessments were canceled at forfeiture by operation of law. A percentage of the
amount of the cancelled special assessments will be paid from any tax-forfeited land sales proceeds. Should any
portion remain unpaid municipalities have the ability to reassess the unpaid' balance against the property, as
provided by Minnesota Statutes, section 429.071. However, please keep in mind that the tax-forfeiture process
serves as a "cleansing" process to effectuate return of properties to productive taxpaying status.
VI. The amount and type of special assessments levied after the forfeiture should be certified to this office. These
"new certified*' special assessments are added to the rain/mum bid appraised value used in the auction. The "new
certified" special assessments are to be paid from any tax-forfeited land sales proceeds.
VII. Each parcel should be reviewed for special status, such as public waterfront, wetland, peat lands and marketable
timber resource issues, or any potential public nuisance or special zoning conditions or restrictiom. The
statutory Citations are shown in COunty Auditor's Directive No. 2003-32, a copy of which is enclosed: Any
information supplied by the municipalities may be helpf~d in the successful disposition of thee lands.
We ask your assistance in deten~ inirtg if any parcels on List # 1269 C/NC have wells. If any of the parcels on the list have wells,
please request a M~u~es0TM Department. of Health Well Disclosure .Certificate.. from this department.. Az. noted. .ab°ve' please.
provide ava~ab~e ~om=tiOn ah0ut p,~cels ~uoh~s zo~g, ~o,,~ so,1 condiUo~s, ~no. wn en~o,menta! ~nt, m~ aUo~ o[ ~pec~.al
mmicipal restdctious. SuCh i.~f0/'mation may assist the county m managing and marketing the propemes m ore,er to facilitate its
return to a tax productive status.
If you request conveyance to your governmental subdivisiou, please submit a properly completed and executed form PT962.tCAl~
ritled, "Application by a Gow~,~e~,t~! Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lz,d~ for au Authorized Public Use" for each
parcel requested. Minnesot~ Department of Kevenue requires use of this form'Enclosed is form PT962.RAK. Please call Property
Tax Services Unit at (61.2) 3z~'8-$734 if you nee~ more blank forms, or it is located on the Department of Kevenue website at the
following address: http://www, taxez.state, mn. us/proptax/propinfo/stdee, d/statedeed, htm. . Conveyance to a governmental
subdivision for a pizblic purpose is subjeCt to the recommendation of the County Board. The Hennepin County Board's Tax-
Forfeited Land. Policy, l~eS01ution No. $2-8-612, r. equires that a specific public purpose be identified in the request. A copy of the
re~°lution is enclosed. In 'out'experience, the Minnesota Department of P~venue discourages use of the generic phrase "public
purposes" on the requests.for state deeds. Rather~ the specific public purpose that has been identified for the lands Should be stated
on the mmicipal application.
· ' -4364-
RESOLUT 1 ON NO,
· .:T:h'e~ fol 1 Dwi ng r~O1 uti o'n was
WIqER'EAS, nt.m~l'OtlS 'requests are received for sale or conveyance of'tax
[orfeited land to municip'atities and ott~er governmental subdivisioi~s .of the
State, ..
BE IT R~SDLVED that il~ is tt~e general pol.icy of the Hennep~n County
Board to encourage the return of tax forfeited lands within the county to
private ownership and the tax rolls, provided that govern, mental subciivtston~ '
are not discouraged from acquiringilands to be used for Conservation,
recreation, or other purposes as detailed in this resolution,
BE' IT.RESOLVED that tax ~orfeited land will be conveyed to governmental
subdivisions without' monetary considerati'on if:
1~ ' The land t~ to be U~ed for park~, Wetlands, flood c.ontrol~ trailways,
open ~pace; ~treet~ road~ rigl~t~ of way and public access, or
2~ the land t~ v~lued at the receipt of applinat,ion at $1,000 or less per
p~rcel at current values~ or an equivalent value ms:indexed at ten percent
pe~, annum herea~ter~ regardless of public use or purpose, and
BE IT RESOIJVED, that except as otherwise provided in this resolution, tax
forfeited land will not be conveyed to governmental subdivisions unless the
current appraised value is paid, and
BE IT RESOLVED that an application shall' bo required to request..a conveyance-
without payment o~, ~ ~mle. and the ~ppl~i ca ti on shall be accompanied by a resolution
of'th~ §mveYntpg body specifyi~g' the public purpose or intended public use for
~llt'Ch the t~ forfmtte~! land i~ be-~ng acquired, An applicatioh w't.l~ not be
considered unless receiYed at least ten Hays prior to the first publication-of
the notice oS public sale of the subject property, and
BE IT RESD.LVED that 'tile acquisttio'n of.tax forfeited la,nd by a governmental
subdivision (except Housing and Redevel.opmei~t Authorities and other governlnental
subdivisions of the §tate. expressly authorized' by l'aw to resell, lease or tr'an~fep
property) for resale'shall not be approved .by the Board
DE IT RESOLVED 'that the purchase price be paid over a three-year period.
commencing on date .of sale if the governmen'tal sdbdivision has bud.ge't or le. vy
limitations tl~at do not permit cash purchase. Interest sl~all be payable at
tile rate prescribed by law for sales to the public of similar p~operty, anti
, BE IT RESOLVED 'that municipalities are urged to judiciously.eXercise ttief'r
legitimate rights of disapproval of ~ale and classification of taX fOrfet'ted.
.land i'n the context of this resolution', and .
-4365-
' ~e~olu~ion ~o. B~z.~8-bJ~ con~nue~ .
Page 2
BE IT' RESOLVED that pursuant 'to authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section
~B2,03 this Board will impose reasonable conditions on sales to the public
to limit the use of the parcels sold and to. limit amount uf public, expendi'tut~e~
tha~t may. be m'ade for't'he I~eneftt of the parcels when sucli action will. encourage
municipal approval of Sale, and
BE IT .RESOLVED that if applications ar~ concurrently filed by a governmental
subdivision and a' repurchaser to purchase and repurchase respectively the same
tax forfeited land,, the County B~ard will con'sider:
1. The public interest to be served by acq'ui~ition by ttie'governna~ntal
Subdivision.
2.' The public interest to' be ~erved by repurchase.
3. The hardsht'p to be sUFfered by the repurchaser if the repurchase, application
is not approved.
4. The circumstances relating to forfeiture.
'BE IT RESOLVEt~ that on a showing of unusua'l circumstances or hardship the
BDa¢8 of, CommisSioners may, by specific resolution, approve a variance of these
provisions.
BE I'T I~E$O[VED that Resolution No. 81-3-125 is hereby rescinded.
"Commlssloner Kremer. offered a friendly amendment' to the secoAcl resolving
clause., the second paragrapH, to in.sert the Word "nlarket" between "currenE"
~nd "v~lues" and after the words "at ten percent" to strike "per annum hei-eafter"
and insert therefor "January 1st. annually." CommiSsioner Johnson accepted the-
frien'dly amendment and no objections Were voiced,
Commissioner Kremer moved to ~dd the fotlov~ing sentence to the fourth
resolving clause: Each application and RBA involving a parcel with a market
· 'value in excess of $1,000 shall include the lot. lowing: the acreage of the
property, current ~oning, current use ~nd waterfront, if ~ny. The mot!on
.w~s seconcled by Commissioner Robb and .approved unanimously,
Commissioner llobb offered a friendly ame~ndment to the first line of .the
secohd resolving claose, after the word "conveyed" to add the words "for public
use or purpose." Commlssi'oner JohnSbn accepted th~ friendly, amendment'and no
objectl.ons were voiced.
'~ The ques.tion was on the adoptfon of the resolution~ as amended', and there
were Seven YEAS and no NAYS' as follows:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
BOARD OF COUNTY COHMISSIONERS
Jeff Spartz
Randy Johnson
R~h~rd E. Krm, ei'
E. F. Robb~ Jr.
Sam S. S(vanich
Nancy Olkon
John E. Derus, Chairman
YEA iNA. y, .OTHER
X
ESOLOTION.^O0
AUG 1 0 1982
I-Ienne~in. County Map. Sgrvgr Page I 0£2
Click onmap to view information on adjoining properties
Scroll down to see property address, vai. ue & tax. inf'o
L~t ~g~tc: 9/0:~/2003 ~t 1:00:00 PM
READ IMPORTAiNT DISCLAIM. ER INFORMATION BELOW
Click on Property infonnation BuUon below to view main
tax informal:ion page for the property you have selected
The data contained on this page is dedved from.a compilation of records and maps and may contain
discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an acCurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The
perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and.may contain discrepancies. The
information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the
accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this
information or its derivatives.
Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612)348-2618 or
via e-mail at Bob.Moutder@c0.hennepirl;mn.ns.
The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is bestviewed at
800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or lat, r version for
proper operation.
htt'p ://wwwl 9. co. hennepin,ma.us/scripts/esrimap,dlt.?name=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALlj...
-4367-
9~9/2003
I
PlO
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-.__
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE RETENTION OF TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY
#19-117-23-22-0024 FOR WETLAND PURPOSES
Applicant: Hennepin County Tax Payer Services Department
WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a recommendation for either the release for sale or
retention of tax forfeited property # 19-117-23-22-0024,
WHEREAS, City Staff unanimously recommended the retention of the property for
wetland purposes,
WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of November 25,
2003.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to approve the retention of tax forfeited property # 19.117-23-22-0024 for
wetland purposes.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
seconded by Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this
and
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-4369-
PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
November 13, 2003
Present:
Commissioners Susan Taylor, Ron Motyka, Gene Hostetler, Norm
Domholt, Derrick Hentz, John Beise, Council Represemative Bob
Brown, Park Superimendent Jim Fackler and Secretary
Denice Widmer
Chair Susan Taylor called the meeting to order at 7:32pm.
Approval of the October 9, 2003 Min~.t~s
Motion by Motyka to approve the October 9, 2003
Domholt. Motion carried.
by
Agenda Changes
Commissioner Beise requested
Driving in
Interviews: No applicants at this time.
Taylor
Fackler gave a brief overview,
property for sale ,ming
existing ~,,by Brown
Property ~.,;
must be
3-0234
releasing this
must be combined with
~ Tax Forfeited
adjoining property owners only and
by Beise. Motion Carried.
gave
of the existing code as well as the proposed code.
changes due the current code being
as
The
705.20
operate any
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or
in the following ways:
No snowraobile shall be driven within 100 feet of any fisherman,'
pedestrian, skating rink, or sliding area or in any other area where
the operation would conflict with or endanger other persons or
property.
No snowmobile shall be operated in any cemetery.
No snowmobiles shall be operated on private property of another
without permission of the owner or lawful occupant of said
property.
No snowmobile shall be operated in a manner so as to create a
loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise which disturbs, annoys, or
interferes with the peace and quiet of other persons.
-4370-
Release Of Tax ForfeiturePrope _r~y, ~
DATE: 10/14/2003
SUBJECT: Review and approve PID~ 19-117-23-22-0024 for either public auction, auction to
adjacent owners, or public use conveyance or nonpublic sale to the City of Mound. If the City
Council fails to respond to this notice by December 1, 2003, the sale of the lands will be deemed
approved, pursuant to M.S.282.01, Subd.1.
APPLICANT: Hennepin County Tax Payer Services
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City
departments for review and comment. Al! written comments received to date have been
summarized below:
Sarah Smith: Area is in wetland. ~ecommends parcel not be released. Advises
Planning Commission should review.
John Cameron: Recommends retaining this property for wetland purposes.
Greg Skinner: No utilities. Can be released.
Jim Fackler: Recommends retaining this property for both Parks and Docks as
wetlands and shoreline lineal ft count. Recommends review by POSAC and DCAC.
PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW
Copies of the proposal were forwarded to all involved public agencies. All written
comments received to date have been included in the packet as separate attachments,
Marilyn Bell, Hennepin County Tax Forfeited Property Division:
No comment necessary at this time.
SITE INSPECTION
City Officials and Board Members are encouraged to visit the site prior to the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommends retaining this property for wetlands and shoreline purposes and
approving this parcel for non-public sale to the City of Mound.
-4371 -
Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department
A-600 Hennepin County Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-C)060
September 26, 2003
BY, CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUI::STED
BONNIE RITTER CITY CLERK
CiTY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD RD
MOUND MN 55364
RE: Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List#1269C/NC
The lands as described on Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List # 1269 C/NC, were classified as either
conservation lands or non-conservation lands, as is appropr ate by the CountyAuditor's Administrative Review Board.
Enclosed is a copy of County Auditor's Direct ve No. 2003-32 providing for the c assification of the lands~ under
authority grahted in accordance to Minnesota Statute 282.135 by the Board of Hennepin County CommiSsioners.
As required under M.S. 282.01, the department requests that your city officials review Cor~servati~n/No.n'Conservat on
List # 1269 C/NC.' When municipal .reView haS been completed, the department Will require a certified copy of a
municipal re¢dlUtibri"that resolves and approves parcels for pUblic auction, for a~Ction to adjacent OWnem, or requests
public use cbnveyance or nonpublic sale to your city; I[ should be noted that certain changes' in tax-forfeted land
procedures were'~ade by the Minhesota Legislature aS p'art' of the 2001 Tax Reform Law. see enclosed Exhibit A, an
outline for suggested points that should be ~Overed in yOUr municipal resolution.
Please be advised that the sale of the lands shall be deemed to be approved purSuant to M.$. 282.01~ Subd. ¢~
if the city council fails to respond to this classification notice within sixty' (60) days of receipt of certified mail.
The deadiine for respsnding Will '~'e On' or about December ~, 2003.
Please contact Terry Schuhler, ProPerty Tax Services unit leader, at (612)-348-3734 or (612)-596-6527(voice mail),
should you need further assistance or clarification.
Sincerely,
Patrick Hi O'Connor, Director
Taxpayer Services Department
Jeffrey L. Strand, Supervisor
Tax-Forfeit and Property Revenue Section
PHO:JLS:tls
Enclosures
-4372-
An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Pop P69
Office of the County AUditor
County of Hennepin
State of Minnesota
COUNTY.AUDITOR'S DIRECTIVE
(Tax-Forfeited Land)
'NI o. 2003'32
To all persons interested in the lands hereinafter described:
Whereas, pursuant to legal authority as provided under Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.1 35, the
Director of Taxpayer Services Department. acting in the capacity of County Auditor-Treasurer, has
had the matter hereinafter described come before the County Auditor for administrative.'review; and
Whereas, pursuant to the application or request for change of status of tax-forfeited land described
mere fUlly below, the undersigned Deputy County Auditor finds as follows:
1. That the Hennepin CoUnty AUditor'hereby certifies the Conservation or Non-
Conservation status and authorizes public sale of all Non-Conservation classified parcels of land on
Conservation or Non-Conservation Classification List 1269 C/NC, on file with the Hennepin County
Auditor, except where Conservation classification status is noted on said list. and further certifies
float all'parcels therein have been viewed and comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 85.012, 92.46!, 282.01, Subd. 8, 282.018, Subd. 1, and 282.018, Subd. 2, and other statutes
that require the withholding of tax-forfeited land from sale; and that the Hennepin County Auditor
hereby requests approval, where appropriate and necessary, from the Minnesota Department Of
NatUral ResOUrces for the sale of tax-forfeited land listed on Conservation or Non-Conservation
Classification List 1269 C/NC.
September 24, 2003
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
Patrick Hi p'Connor, County Auditor
DePuty County Auditor
P70 -4373-
-4374- '.
P71
EXHIBIT A.
L
Outline of Suggested Points to Cover in a Governmental ~ubdlvislon
Resolution for Tax-Forfeited Lands
Municipal officials should approve the classification as Comervation and/or Non-Conservation land.
The parcels should be formally recommended for public auction approval, for adjacent owner auction atOProval if
Minnesota Statutes, section 282.01, gubd. 7a for unbuildsble vacant lots is appBcable, or for req-nesting a
conveyance for au authorized public use to your governmental subdivi~, io~ or for requesting a nonpublic sale to
you¢ governmental subdivision.
L
Upon receipt of a written application from a city or a goverrrmental subdivision within 60 days of the
classification by the county, a parceI may be withheld from auction for a time period not to exceed six months, in'
accordance with M~nnesota Statues, section 282.01, Sub& 1. A city or governmental subdivision rrn~ pay
maintenance costs incurred by the county during the sLx-month period during which the land is withheld from
auction, provided the property is not offered for pubhc sale after the end of the sLx-month pgriock The written
application should be in the form of a municipal resolution requesting acquisition and the reason fox the slx-
month hold.
Under the Miunesota Legislature's 2001 Tax Reform, procedures on targeted neighborhood lands were made
uniform and consistent throughout thc state. Effective for deeds issued on or after August 1, 2001 the
recommendation of the County Board is required for applications for conveyance of targeted neighborhood tax-
forfeited lands to be acquired for redevelopment as productive taxable property. Further, deeds of conveyance
.issued under paragraph (a) of Minnesota Statutes, section 282.01, Subd. lb. axe not conditioned on continued use
of the property as stated in the application. (Laws of 200I, H1 Article 3, Sectiofl 60)
V
Each parcel should be verified as to the amount and type of special assessments shown as certified to the county
before forfeiture. These special ~sessments were canceled at forfeiture by operation of law. A percentage of the
mount of the cancelled special assessments will b'e paid from any tax-forfeited 1.aud sales proceeds. Should anY
portion remain unpaid municipalities have the ability to reassess the unpaid balance agak~st the prcrper~y, as
provided by Minnesota Statutes, section 429.071. However, please keep in mind that the tax-forfeiture process
serves as a "cleansing" process to effectuate return of properties to productive mxpaying status.
The amolmt and type of special assessments levied after the forfeiture should be certified to this office. These
"new certified" special assessments are added to the minimum bid appraised value used in the auction. The "new
certified" special assessments, are to be pad from any tax-forfeited laud sales proceeds.
Es. ch parcel should be reviewed for special status, such as public waterfront, wetland, peat lands and marketable
~mber resource issues, or any potential public nuisance or special zoning conditions or restrictions. The
statutory citations are shown in County AuditOr's Directive No. 2003-32, a copy of which is enclosed. Any
infomtion supplied by the 'municipalities' may be helpful in the successful disposition of the lands.
We ask your assistance in determlni~g ff any parcels on List # 1269 C/NC have wells. If any of the parcels on the list have wells,
please request a Minnesota Depmlmmat of Health Well Disclosure Certificate from this depa~t~uent. As noted above, please
provide available information about parcels such as zoning, known soil conditions, known.environmental c~.ntamination, or special
nmnicipal restrictions. Such info--on may assist the county in managing and mar1~eting the properties in order to facilitate its
re~'n to a tax productive status.
If you request conveyance to your governmental subdivision, please submit a properly completed and executed form PT962.RAR,
titled, :!'Application by a Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands for au Authorized Public Use" for each
parcel requested. Minnesota Department of Kevenue requires use of this form. Enclosed is form PT962.RAtL Please call Property
Tax Services Unit at (61.2) 348-3734 if you need more blank forms, or it is located on the Department of P,.evenue website at the
following address: http://www, taxes.~tate, mn. us/proptax/propinfo/stdeed/statedeed, htm . Conveyance to a governmental
eem~bdivision for a public purpose is subject to the reconmaendation of the County Board. The Hennepin County Board's Tax-
offeited Land Policy, P--esolution No. ~2-8-612, requires that a specific public purpose be identified in the request A copy of the
~olufion is enclosed. In our experience, the Minnesota Department of Kevenue discourages use of the gencio phrase "public
purposes" on the requests for state deeds. Rather, the specific public purpose that has been identified for the lauds ~hould be stated
on the rmmicipal application.
-4375-
P72
R~SDLUYIoN No, ,
00 @o'
'. . The following resolutio'n w.a.~; offered by .Commissioner do,hns.on .se:onCied
by commissioner Kg'i~m~.¢! ' '
WHEREAS, num.a!'~Us'.requests are received For' sale or co. nv~yance c~F tax
Forfeited land to m(mic~p'aliti~s and other gaver~}ental subdfvisiohs ~f the
State;
BE IT R~SOLVED that i{ ~s the general Pal.icy of the Hennep~n County
Board to ,ncourag~ the return of tax forfeited land~ within the cmmty to
private own~rshiPJ~;~:and the 'tax rolls, provided that gov~rnmentnl subdivisions ·
rare not discouraged from acquiring'lands to be used for conservation,
r~creation, or othe~ purpojS~s as detail,d in this. resolutioh..
BE' ~T.RESDLV~D; that. tax ~orf~ted l~nd will b, conveyed to governmental
~ubdiV~ions WtthD~t' ~nOn~ry consid~rat~bn if:
1~ ' The l~nd.t~.tb b~ U~ed fo.r park~, wetlands, flood Control~ trailways,
ope~ ~p~cel ~tff~et~, ro'~d~ rigl~t~, of why and publi'c ncc~s~, or
~ th~ lan~ t~ valued at the Yeceipt of applicat}on, at.$1,OOO or less per
p~rcel a~ cur?ent valu~ oran equivalent v~lue ~...indexed at ten p~raent
pe~ annum here~teP, r~gard!eSs of public use or purpose, and
BE IT RESOLVED, that mxcept as otherwise provfd'ed in th~s r~solUtlon, tax
forfeited land will not be c°nvey~d to governmental subdivisions unless the
current apprai's~d value ~s p~id,.and.
BE IT RESOLVED that an appli~c~ion shall'be, r~qulr'~d to request a conveyance-
without payment Or a ~le. and the ~.pplqca't~on shall be. accompanied ~Y a r~solution
.of'th~ g~ve~nlng body ~pecifyt~g" tbe'pbb'l'~c purpos:e or intended public us, for
whfCh the t~ forf~fte~ land i~ be;~ng.'<~c~ulred,. An application wt.l~ not b~
con.~ider,d unles~ r~ce~'v~d ~ l'~ast~' ?h'~'H~y:s pr~o'~::~o ~he first publication.of
th~ not'ice o% public sale of the S~b2ect prop~rty~ and · '
BE IT RE~D.LVED that.the acqu~stti6n o~.ta~ f~rf~ited land by a governmental
subdivision (~xc~pE HDU~.img and other gover~ntat
subdivisions of ~h~ ~tat~.expressly authorized'by law to resell, lease or trnn~f~r
prop,rty) for resale' shal~ no~ be approved by the Board
BE IT RESOLVED 'tha'.t the purchase price be paid ower a three-year peri'od.~
commencing on date.of sal~ if the governmen'tal subdivision has budget m, levy
limitations tt~aE do not permit cash purahas~. ].nter~st shall be Payable ,t
th, rate prescrib6d by l,w for' g~les to.t;h~ p~blic oF similar p~op~rty, and
'l ' BE I'T RESOLVED'th~t'municipallties are urged to,judl.ci°us]y.exerc~s~, tl~fr
eg~ttmat~ rights of d~sapproval of ~alB and'claSs~f}cat~on'of tax f~rfeft~d.
]and im the context of this r~solutian', and ,
-4376-
,AUG 0 19.82 P73
Hennepin County Map Server
Page 1 of 2
Click on m~p to view informmion on ~'" ' ' ,~
,~aj mmng proper6 e s
$cro!l down to see property address, value & tax idb
I~{t upcLate: 9/03/2003 ~t [:O0:OO PM
READ LMPORTANT DISCI. ALMER INFORMATION BELow
19-117-23-22..0024
Pr.~,per t.y
ADDRESS
~4DUND, MN 0
627 ~.
~rk~t V~tu~
24,459 sq.ff. =
acres
$ .00
Clk.k on,Property Information Button below to view main
tax informati on page for the proper .ty you have selected
The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain
discrepancies that can only' be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The
perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The
information on this.page shOuld be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the
accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentationof this
information or its derivatives.
Please report any map disCrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County SUrvey Division) at (612)348-2618 or
via e-mail at Bob.Moulder@co.hennepin,mr~.~s
The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at
800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for
proper operation.
P74
http://wwwl 9 co.hennepin.mn.us/seripts/esrirnap.dll?name=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALU. ,, -4377-
9/29/2003
oo; _5
Vl ~BB3~
(BO ONV]S I )
40 X I 1'.9
,/
!
I
/,
(^~) ¥..'1. NOA30
53,41 MaywoorJ Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sarah Smith
November 18, 2003
Public Hearing - Review of Amendments to City Code Chapter 350
Adult Establishments
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
Pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:520, Subd. 2 (D), the City Council will hold a public
hearing to review the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to regulate adult
use activities in the City of Mound.
BACKGROUND
In November, 2002, the City Council adopted a one-year moratorium for the purpose of
undertaking a study associated with the preparation of a new ordinance to regulate
adult use activities in the City of Mound. Over the course of the past two months, the
Planning Commission, in cooperation with Staff, has studied the issue(s) and has
prepared a number of proposed amendments to City Code Section 350 including a new
Section 350:1400 entitled Adult Establishments. Additionally, there are other
amendments that are needed to implement the new adult use regulations including, but
not limited to, modifications to the Business and Industrial Use Table and Pedestrian
District Regulations to allow adult establishments as a permitted use in the B-l,
Pedestrian, and I-1 Districts subject to the provisions of City Code Section 350:1400.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
Publication Requirements. Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd. 3 states that no
zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the
planning agency or by the governing body. The notice of the public hearing must be
published at least (10) days prior to the hearing date. Members of the Council are
advised that the notice of public hearing was published in the Laker on November 15,
2003.
-4379-
Planning Commission Review. City Code Section 350:520, Subd. 2 (A) states that an
amendment to the text of the Ordinance or zoning map may be initiated by the City
Council, the Planning Commission or by a property owner. Any amendment which is
not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission
for review and must not be acted upon until it has received the Planning Commission's
recommendation.
Required Vote. A majority vote of the City Council members present in the affirmative
is required to approve the proposed zoning amendments.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 1 to recommend approval of
the proposed amendments to the City Code to regulate adult establishments in the City
of Mound as recommended by Staff subject to the removal of the fees which were
specified in the ordinance and inclusion of a statement to reference that the fees are to
be set by the City Council.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Permitted Use. Adult establishments will be allowed in the B-1 Central
Business District, Pedestrian PUD District and I-1 Industrial District subject to
the following Iocational criteria:
A. 200 feet from exclusion properties (residential, public, school, church,
parks, day care).
B. 200 feet from another adult use.
A copy of the buffer graphic that identifies allowable areas for adult
establishments has been included.
Publication by Title and Summary. As the City Council is aware, all
ordinances must be published to be effective. Due to the length of City Code
Section 350:1400 (as proposed) and to minimize publication costs, Staff is
recommending that the adult establishment ordinance amendment be published
in summary form as allowed by Minnesota Statutes Section 412.191.
As a 4/5's vote of the Council is needed to approve publication of the ordinance
in summary form, action on this item cannot occur on November 25, 2003 due to
the absence of the Mayor and Councilmember Osmek. Therefore, this item has
been included on the agenda of the special meeting of the City Council to be
held on Monday, December 1,2003 at 6:30 PM at the request of the Mayor.
-4380-
Fees, The fees referenced in City Code Chapter 350:1400 (Adult
Establishments) are proposed as follows:
Annual License Fee
Background Check - Police Department
$ 2000.00
65.00 / per hour
Since state statute requires that land use and zoning fees must be adopted by
ordinance, these fees have been included in ordinance form and will be acted on
separately as an agenda item.
-4381 -
-4382-
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS INCLUDING
ADDING A NEW SECTION 350:1400 (ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS), AMENDING
350:670 (LAND USE TABLES), AMENDING SECTION 350:652 (PEDESTRIAN DISTRICT
REGULATIONS) AND AMENDING SECTION 350:310 (DEFINITIONS)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will
meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, at 7:30 p.m.
on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 to consider the following amendments to the City of
Mound Zoning Code as follows:
Amendment- City Code Section 350:1400 (Adult Establishments):
Summary. Amendment to the Zoning Code to add a new Section 350:1400 to
regulate adult establishments within the City of Mound.
Section 350:670 (Business and Industrial Districts) Uses and Section 350:652
(Pedestrian District Uses):
Summary: Amendments to Zoning Code Sections 350:670 and 350:652 to add
"Adult Establishments" as a "Permitted Use" in the B-l, Pedestrian and I-1 Districts
subject to the criteria as set forth in City Code Section 350:1400.
Amendments to Zoning Code Section 350:670 to include "Adult Establishments" as a
"Non Allowed Use" in the B-2 and B-3 Business Districts.
Section 350:310 Definitions:
Summary: Amendment to Zoning Code to add a definition for day care facility
(child) as follows:
Day Care Facility, Child. A facility that provides non-medical care to children
under 18 years of age in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance
essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the
individual on less than a 24-hour basis. Child day care facility includes
commercial and home based day care.
Copies of the ordinance amendments are available to the public upon request at City
Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the
opportunity to be heard at this meeting.
By: Jill Norlander, Planning and
Inspections Secretary
Published in the Laker on November 15, 2003.
Posted:
-4383-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 3, 2003
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT.._ADULT USE STUDY AND ORDINANCF
Smith highlighted several specifics in the ordinance.
Mueller thought that the dollar amounts should be changed to "as determined by the
City Council from time to time" (pages 39 and 40). He also challenged the time frame
that was established. To allow the liquor establishments to be open longer opens the
City up to litigation.
MOTION by Osmek, second by Clapsaddle, to approve the adult use ordinance with the
following modifications: strike out any reference to specific fees and replace with the
phrase "fees as determined by the City council"
Discussion
Mueller thought the hours of operation should be stated more clearly.
Mueller indicated he will vote against this motion because we don't need more law suits
in the City. Adult use establishments should have the same hours of operation as
liquor.
MOTION carried. Voting for: Clapsaddle, Ayaz, Hasse, Michael, Osmek and
Schwingler; Voting against: Mueller.
-4384-
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 350 OF THE
CITY CODE PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF
ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE CITY OF MOUND.
THE CITY OF MOUND DOES ORDAIN:
That a new subsection 350.1400 be added as follows:
ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS
SECTION 350:1400. PURPOSE AND INTENT.
Subd. 1. Findines of the City Council. Studies conducted by the Minnesota Attorney General, the
American Planning Association and cities such as St. Paul, Minneapolis and Rochester, Minnesota;
Indianapolis, Indiana; Phoenix, Arizona; Los Angeles, California; Seattle, Washington; St. Croix
County, Wisconsin, have studied the impacts that adult establishments have in those communities.
These studies have concluded that adult establishments have an adverse impact on the surrounding
neighborhoods. Those impacts include increased crime rates, lower property values, increased
transiency, neighborhood blight and potential health risks. The City Council of the City of Mound
makes the following findings regarding the need to regulate adult establishments. The findings are
based upon the experiences of other cities where such businesses have located, as studied by City staff.
Based on these studies and findings, the city council concludes:
A. Adult establishments have adverse secondary impacts of the types set forth above.
B. The adverse impacts caused by adult establishments tend to diminish if adult establishments
are governed by locational requirements, licensing requirements and health requirements.
C. It is not the intent of the city council to prohibit adult establishments from having a reasonable
opportunity to locate in the city.
D. Minnesota Statutes, SectiOn 462.357, allows the city to adopt regulations to promote the
public health, safety, morals and general welfare.
E. The public health, safety, morals and general welfare will be promoted by the City adopting
regulations governing adult establishments.
F. Adult establishments can contribute to an increase in criminal activity in the area in which
such businesses are located, taxing city crime-prevention programs and law enforcement
services.
MDT-238946vl
MU200-117
1
-4385-
G. Adult establishments can be used as fronts for prostitution and other criminal activity. The
experience of other cities indicates that the proper management and operation of such businesses
can, however, minimize this risk, provided the owners and operators of such facilities are
regulated by licensing or other procedures.
H. Adult establishments can increase the risk of exposure to communicable diseases including
but not limited to Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) for which currently there is
no cure. Experiences of other cities indicate that such businesses can facilitate the spread of
communicable diseases by virtue of the design and use of the premises, thereby endangering not
only the patrons of such establishments but also the general public.
I. Adult establishments can cause or contribute to public health problems by the presence of live
adult entertainment in conjunction with food and/or drink on the same premises.
J. The risk of criminal activity and/or public health problems can be minimized through a
licensing and regulatory scheme as prescribed herein.
Subd. 2. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Ordinance to regulate Adult Establishments to promote the
health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the citizens of the City and to establish reasonable and
uniform regulations to:
A. Prevent additional criminal activity within the City,
B. Prevent deterioration of neighborhoods and its consequent adverse effect on real estate values
of properties within the neighborhood;
C. To locate Adult Establishments away from residential areas, schools, churches, libraries,
parks, and playgrounds;
D. Prevent concentration of Adult Establishments within certain areas of the City.
Subd. 3. The provisions of this Ordinance have neither the purpose nor effect of imposing a limitation
or restriction on the content of any communicative materials, including adult oriented materials.
Similarly, it is not the intent nor effect of this Ordinance to restrict or deny access by adults to adult
oriented materials protected by the First Amendment or to deny access by distributors and exhibitors of
adult oriented entertainment to their intended market.
SECTION 350:1405. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this Ordinance the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.
Subd. 1. "Adult Establishment" means:
MDT-238946vl
MU200-117
A. Any business that devotes a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, o~
publicly displayed merchandise, or devotes a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not
including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to
the public) to, or derives a substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues from, items,
-4386-
merchandise, devices or other materials distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on material
depicting, exposing, simulating, describing, or relating to Specified Sexual Activities or Specified
Anatomical Areas; or
B. Any business that engages in any Adult Use as defined in Subdivision 2 of this subsection.
Subd. 2. "Adult Use." Any of the activities and businesses described below:
A. "Adult Body Painting Studio" means an establishment or business that provides the service of
applying paint, ink, or other substance, whether transparent or non-transparent, to the body of a
patron when the person is nude.
B. "Adult Bookstore" means an establishment or business used for the barter, rental, or sale of items
consisting of printed matter, pictures, slides, records, audio tape, videotape, movies, DVDs or
motion picture film if a substantial or significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly
displayed merchandise consists of, or if a substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not
including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms, basements, or any portion of the business not open to
the public) is devoted to, or if substantial or significant portion of its gross revenues is derived from
items, merchandise, devices or materials that are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on
material depicting, exposing, simulating, describing, or relating to Specified Sexual Activities or
Specified Anatomical Areas.
C. "Adult Cabaret" means a business or establishment that provides dancing or other live
entertainment distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on: (1) the depiction of nudity,
Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas; or (2) the presentation, display, or
depiction of matter that seeks to evoke, arouse, or excite sexual or erotic feelings or desire.
D. "Adult Companionship Establishment" means a business or establishment that provides the
service of engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or discussion distinguished or characterized
by an emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
E. "Adult Conversation/Rap Parlor" means a business or establishment that provides the services of
engaging in or listening to conversation, talk, or discussion distinguished or characterized by an
emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
F. "Adult Health/Sport Club" means a health/sport club that is distinguished or characterized by an
emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
G. "Adult Hotel or Motel" means a hotel or motel that presents material distinguished or
characterized by an emphasis on matter depicting, describing, or relating to Specified Sexual
Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
H. "Adult Massage Parlor/Health Club" means a massage parlor or health club that provides
massage services distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on Specified Sexual Activities or
Specified Anatomical Areas.
MDT-238946vl
MU200-117
I. "Adult Mini-Motion Picture Theater" means a business or establishment with a capacity of less
than 50 persons that as a prevailing practice presents on-premises viewing of movies, motion
3
-4387-
pictures, or other material distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on Specified Sexua}
Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
J. "Adult Modeling Studio" means a business or establishment that provides live models who, with
the intent of providing sexual stimulation or sexual gratification, engage in Specified Sexual
Activities or display Specified Anatomical Areas while being observed, painted, painted upon,
sketched, drawn, sculptured, photographed, or otherwise depicted.
K. "Adult Motion Picture Arcade" means any place to which the public is permitted or invited
where coin or slug-operated or electronically, electrically, or mechanically controlled or operated
still or motion picture machines, projectors, or other image-producing devices are used to show
images to five or fewer persons per machine at any one time, and where the images so displayed are
distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on depicting or describing Specified Sexual
Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
L. "Adult Motion Picture Theater" means a motion picture theater with a capacity of 50 or more
persons that as a prevailing practice presents material distinguished or characterized by an emphasis
on Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas for observation by patrons.
M. "Adult Novelty Business" means an establishment or business that devotes a substantial or
significant portion of its inventory, stock in trade, or publicly displayed merchandise or devotes a
substantial or significant portion of its floor area (not including storerooms, stock areas, bathrooms,
basements, or any portion of the business not open to the public) to, or derives a substantial or
significant portion of its gross revenues from items, merchandise, or devices that are distinguishea
or characterized by an emphasis of material depicting or describing Specified Sexual Activities or
Specified Anatomical Areas, or items, merchandise or devices that simulate Specified Sexual
Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas, or are designed for sexual stimulation.
N. "Adult Sauna" means a sauna that excludes minors by reason of age, and that provides a steam
bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of bathing, relaxation, or reducing, if the service
provided by the sauna is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on Specified Sexual
Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
O. "Adult Steam Room/Bathhouse Facility" means a building or portion of a building used for
providing a steam bath or heat bathing room used for the purpose of pleasure, bathing, relaxation, or
reducing, if the building or portion of a building restricts minors by reason of age and if the service
provided by the steam room/bathhouse facility is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on
Specified Sexual Activities or Specified Anatomical Areas.
Subd. 3. "Nude" or "Specified Anatomical Areas" means:
A. Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic regions, buttocks, anuses,
or female breasts below a point immediately above the top of the areola; and
B. Human male genitals in a discernibly turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered.
Subd. 4. "Specified Sexual Activities" means:
MDT-238946vl
MU200-117
-4388-
Subd.
A. Actual or simulated: sexual intercourse; oral copulation; anal intercourse; oral-anal copulation;
bestiality; direct physical stimulation of unclothed genitals; flagellation or torture in the context of a
sexual relationship; the use of excretory functions in the context of a sexual relationship; anilingus;
coprophagy; coprophilia; cunnilingus; fellatio; necrophilia; pedophilia; piquerism; or zooerastia;
B. Clearly depicted human genitals in the state of sexual stimulation, arousal, or tumescence;
C. Use of human or animal ejaculation, sodomy, oral copulation, coitus, or masturbation;
D. Fondling or touching of nude human genitals, pubic regions, buttocks, or female breasts;
E. Situations involving a person or persons, any of whom are nude, who are clad in undergarments
or in sexually revealing costumes and engaged in the flagellation, torture, fettering, binding, or other
physical restraint of any person;
F. Erotic or lewd touching, fondling, or other sexually oriented contact with an animal by a human
being; or
G. Human excretion, urination, menstruation, or vaginal or anal irrigation.
5. "Substantial or Significant Portion" means: 25% or more.
.ECTION 350:1410. APPLICATION OF THIS ORDINANCE.
Subd. 1. Except as this Ordinance specifically provides, no structure shall be erected, converted,
enlarged, reconstructed, or altered, and no structure or land shall be used, for any purpose nor in any
manner which is not in conformity with this Ordinance.
Subd. 2. No Adult Establishment shall engage in any activity or conduct or permit any other person to
engage in any activity or conduct in or about the establishment which is prohibited by any ordinance of
the City of Mound, the laws of the State of Minnesota, or the United States of America. Nothing in this
Ordinance shall be construed as authorizing or permitting conduct that is prohibited or regulated by
other statutes or ordinances, including but not limited to statutes or ordinances prohibiting the
exhibition, sale, or distribution of obscene material generally, or the exhibition, sale, or distribution of
specified materials to minors.
SECTION 350: 1415. LOCATION.
Subd. 1. Permitted Use. Adult Establishments are permitted uses in the B-1 Central Business District,
the PED Pedestrian Planned Unit Development District and the I-1 Light Industrial District.
Subd. 2. Restrictions.
A. An adult establishment must be located at least two hundred (200) radial feet, as measured in a
straight line from the closest point of the proposed adult establishment structure to the property line
MDT-238946vl
MU200-117
-4389-
of any: residential property; school; church or place of worShip; city-owned facility; park or
recreational property; child daycare facility; adult establishment.
B. If the proposed adult establishment is located in a multi-tenant building, the measurement
described in paragraph (a) shall be taken from the nearest point of the portion of the building where
the adult establishment is located.
C. An applicant for an adult establishment license must demonstrate to the City that the location
requirements in this subsection have been met.
SECTION 350:1420. HOURS OF OPERATION.
No Adult Establishment shall be open to the public from the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m. weekdays and
Saturdays, nor at any time on Sundays or national holidays.
SECTION 350:1425. OPERATION.
Subd. 1. Off-site Viewine. Any business operating as an Adult Establishment shall prevent off-site
viewing of its merchandise, which if viewed by a minor, would be in violation of Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 617 or other applicable Federal or State Statutes or local ordinances.
Subd. 2. Entrances. All entrances to the business, with the exception of emergency fire exits that art
not useable by patrons to enter the business, shall be visible from a public right-of-way.
Subd. 3. Layout. The layout of any display areas shall be designed so that the management of the
establishment and any law enforcement personnel inside the store can observe all patrons while they
have access to any merchandise offered for sale or viewing including but not limited to books,
magazines, photographs, video tapes, or any other material, or any live dancers or entertainers.
Subd. 4. Illumination. Illumination of the premises exterior shall be adequate to observe the location
and activities of all persons on the exterior premises.
Subd. 5. Siens. Signs for Adult Establishments shall comply with the City's Ordinances for signs
addressed in the City Code sections 365 and 350:651. Signs for Adult Establishments shall not contain
representational depiction of an adult nature or graphic descriptions of the adult theme of the operation.
Subd. 6. Access by Minors. No minor shall be permitted on the licensed premises. Adult goods or
materials may not be offered, sold transferred, conveyed, given or bartered to a minor, or displayed in a
fashion that allows them to be viewed by a minor, whether or not the minor is on the licensed premises.
Subd. 7. Additional Conditions for Adult Cabarets. The following additional conditions apply to
adult cabarets:
A. No dancer, live entertainer or performer shall be under 18 years old.
MDT-238946v 1
MU200-117
6
-4390-
Ill
B. All dancing or live entertainment shall occur on a platform intended for that purpose and which is
raised at least two feet from the level of the floor.
C. No dancer or performer shall perform any dance or live entertainment closer than 10 feet to any
patron.
D. No dancer or performer shall fondle or caress any patron and no patron shall fondle or caress any
dancer or performer.
E. No patron shall pay or give any gratuity to any dancer or performer.
F. No dancer or performer shall solicit or receive any pay or gratuity from any patron.
SECTION 350:1430. LICENSES.
Subd. 1. Licenses Required. All Adult Establishments shall apply for and obtain a license from the
City of Mound. A person or entity is in violation of this Ordinance if the person or entity operates an
Adult Establishment without a valid license, issued by the City.
Subd. 2. Applications. An application for a license must be made on a form provided by the City and
must include:
A. If the applicant is an individual, the name, address, phone number, and birth date of the
applicant. If the applicant is a partnership, the name, residence, phone number, and birth date of
each general and limited partner. If the applicant is a corporation, the names, addresses, phone
numbers, and birth dates of all officers and directors of the corporation;
B. The name, address, phone number, and birth date of the operator and manager of the Adult
Establishment, if different from the owner's;
C. The address and legal description of the premises where the Adult Establishment is to be located;
D. A statement detailing any misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor, or felony convictions relating to
sex offenses, obscenity, or the operation of an Adult Establishment or adult business by the
applicant, operator, or manager, and whether the applicant, operator or manager has ever applied for
or held a license to operate a similar type of business in another community. In the case of a
corporation, a statement detailing any felony convictions by the officers and directors of the
corporation, and whether or not those individuals have ever applied for or held a license to operate a
similar type of business in another community;
E. The activities and types of business to be conducted;
F. The hours of operation;
G. The provisions made to restrict access by minors;
H. A building plan of the premises detailing all internal operations and activities;
M DT-238946v I '~
m~200-~ ~, - 4391 -
I. A sketch or diagram showing the configuration of the premises, including a statement of total
floor space occupied by the business. The sketch or diagram need not be professionally prepared but
must be drawn to a designated scale or drawn with marked dimensions of the interior of the premises
to an accuracy of plus or minus six inches;
J. A statement that the applicant is qualified according to the provisions of this Ordinance and that
the premises have been or will be inspected and found to be in compliance with the appropriate state,
county, and local law and codes by the health official, fire marshal, and building inspector;
K. The names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, of the owner, lessee, if any, the operator or
manager, and all employees; the name, address, and phone number of two persons, who shall be
residents of the State of Minnesota, and who may be called upon to attest to the applicant's,
manager's, or operator's character; whether the applicant, manager, or operator has ever been
convicted of a crime or offense other than a traffic offense and, if so, complete and accurate
information of the disposition thereof; the names and addresses of all creditors of the applicant,
owner, lessee, or manager insofar as credit which has been extended for the purposes of
constructing, equipping, maintaining, operating, or furnishing or acquiring the premises, personal
effects, equipment, or anything incident to the establishment, maintenance and operation of the
business;
L. If the application is made on behalf of a joint business venture, partnership, or any legally
constituted business association, it shall submit along with its application, accurate and complete
business records showing the names, addresses, and dates of birth of partners, owners, and creditors
furnishing credit for the establishment, acquisition, maintenance, and furnishings of said business
and, in the case of a corporation, the names, addresses, and dates of birth of all officers, directors,
and creditors who have extended credit for the acquisition, maintenance, operation, or furnishing of
the establishment including the purchase or acquisition of any items of personal property for use in
said operation; and
M. Complete and accurate documentation establishing the interest of the applicant in the premises
upon which the building is proposed to be located or the furnishings thereof, personal property
thereof, or the operation or maintenance thereof. Documentation shall be in the form of a lease,
deed, contract for deed, mortgage deed, mortgage credit arrangement, loan agreements, security
agreements, and any other documents establishing the interest of the applicant or any other person in
the operation, acquisition or maintenance of the enterprise.
Subd. 3. Disqualifications.
The City will issue a license to an applicant within 30 days of the application unless one or more of the
following conditions exist:
A. The applicant is under 21;
B. The applicant failed to supply all of the information requested on the license application;
C. The applicant gives false, fraudulent, or untruthful information on the license application;
MDT-23§946vl
MU200-117
8
-4392-
D. The applicant has been convicted of a gross misdemeanor or felony or of violating any laTM of this
state or local ordinance relating to sex offenses, obscenity offenses, or adult establishments;
E. The adult establishment is not in full compliance with this Code and all provisions of state and
federal law;
F. The applicant has not paid the required license and investigation fees;
G. The applicant has been denied a license by the City or any other Minnesota municipal corporation
to operate an adult establishment, or such license has been suspended or revoked, within the
preceding twelve (12) months;
H. The applicant is not the proprietor of the establishment for which the license is issued; or
I. The adult establishment premises holds an intoxicating liquor, beer or wine license.
Subd. 4. Requalification. An applicant may qualify for an adult establishment license:
A. After one year has elapsed in the case of a previous license revocation;
B. After two years have elapsed since the date of conviction or the date of release from confinement
in the case of a misdemeanor offense;
C. After five years have elapsed since the date of the last conviction or the date of release from
confinement for the conviction, whichever is later, in the case of a felony offense; or
D. After five years have elapsed since the date of the last conviction or the date of release from
confinement for the last conviction, whichever is later, if the conviction is of two or more
misdemeanor offenses of combination of misdemeanor offense occurring within any 24-month
period.
Subd. 5. Posting. The license, if granted, shall state on its face the name of the person or persons to
whom it is granted, the expiration date, and the address of the Adult Establishment. The license shall be
posted in a conspicuous place at or near the entrance to the Adult Establishment so that it may be easily
read at any time.
SECTION 350:1435. FEES.
Subd. 1. The license fee for Adult Establishments are as follow:
B. An application for a license must be submitted to the city manager and accompanied by payment
of the required license fee. Upon rejection of an application for a license, the city will refund the
license fee.
C. Licenses will expire on December 31 in each year. Each license will be issued for a period of one
year, except that if a portion of the license year has elapsed when the application is made, a license
MDT-238946vl 9
MU200-117
-4393-
may be issued for the remainder of the year for a pro rated fee. In computing a pro rated fee, any
unexpired fraction of a month will be counted as one month.
D. No part of the fee paid by any license will be refunded, except that a pro rata portion of the fee
will be refunded in the following instances upon application to the city council within 30 days from
the happening of one of the following events, provided that the event occurs more than 30 days
before the expiration of the license:
1. Destruction or damage of the licensed premises by fire or other catastrophe;
2. The licensee's illness, if such illness renders the licensee unable to continue operating the
licensed Adult Establishment;
3. The licensee's death; or
4. A change in the legal status making it unlawful for the licensed business to continue.
E. An application must contain a provision in bold prim indicating that withholding information or
providing false or misleading information will be grounds for denial or revocation of a license.
Changes in the information provided on the application or provided during the investigation must be
brought to the attention of the city council by the applicant or licensee. If such a change takes place
during the investigation, it must be reported to the city administrator in writing. A failure by an
applicant or licensee to report such a change may result in a denial or revocation ora license.
Subd. 3. The procedures for granting an Adult Establishment license are as follow:
A. The City will conduct and complete an investigation within 30 days after the city manager receives a
complete application and all license and investigative fees.
B. If the application is for a renewal, the applicant will be allowed to continue business until the city
council has determined whether the applicant meets the criteria of this Ordinance for a renewal license.
C. If, after the investigation, it appears that the applicant and the place prOposed for the business are
eligible for a license, the license must be issued by the city council within 30 days after the investigation
is completed. If the city council fails to act within 30 days after the investigation is completed, the
application will be deemed approved.
SECTION 350:1440. INSPECTION.
Subd. 1. Access. An applicant or licensee shall permit health officials, representatives of the police
department, fire department, and building inspector, to inspect the premises of an Adult Establishment
MDT-238946vl
MU200-117
10
-4394-
for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the law, at any time it is occupied or open for business.
The licensee is at all times responsible for the conduct, activity and operation of the business.
Subd. 2. Refusal to Permit Inspections. A person who operates an Adult Establishment or his/her
agent or employee commits an offense if she or he refuses to permit a lawful inspection of the premises
by health officials, representatives of the police department, fire department, and building inspector at
any time it is occupied or open for business. Refusal to permit inspections may result in nonrenewal,
suspension or revocation of the license as provided in subsection 350:1450 and subsection 350:1455.
Subd. 3. Exceptions. The provisions of this section do not apply to areas of an adult motel which are
currently being rented by a customer for use as a permanent or temporary habitation. Temporary
habitation is defined as a period of time of at least 12 hours.
Subd. 4. Records. The licensee must keep itemized written records of all transactions involving the sale or
rental of all items or merchandise for at least one year after the transaction. At a minimum, those records
must describe the date of the transaction, a description of the transaction, the purchase price or rental price,
and a detailed description of the item or merchandise that is being purchased or rented. These written
records must be provided to the City upon request.
SECTION 350:1445. EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL.
Subd. 1. Expiration. Each license shall expire at the end of the calendar year and may be renewed only
by making application as provided in subsection 350:1430. Application for renewal must be made at
least 60 days before the expiration date.
Subd. 2. Denial of Renewal. When the City denies renewal of a license, the applicant shall not be
issued a license for one year from the date of denial. If, subsequent to denial, the City finds that the
basis for denial of the renewal license has been corrected or abated, the applicant may be granted a
license if at least 90 days have elapsed since the date denial became final.
SECTION 350:1450. SUSPENSION.
Subd. 1. Canses of Suspension. The City may suspend a license for a period not to exceed 30 days if it
determines that the licensee or an employee of a licensee has:
A. Violated or is not in compliance with any provision of this Ordinance.
B. Engaged in the sale or use of alcoholic beverages while on the Adult Establishment premises
other than at an Adult Hotel or Motel.
C. Refused to allow an inspection of the Adult Establishment as authorized by this Ordinance.
D. Knowingly permitted gambling by any person on the Adult Establishment premises.
E. Demonstrated inability to operate or manage an Adult Establishment in a peaceful and law-
abiding manner, thus necessitating action by law enforcement officers.
MDT-238946vl 1 1
~,[u~oo-~], -4395-
Subd. 2. Notice. A suspension by the City shall be preceded by written notice to the licensee and a
public hearing. The notice shall give at least 10 days notice of the time and place of the hearing and
shall state the nature of the charges against the licensee. The notice may be.served upon the licensee
personally, or by leaving the same at the licensed business premises with the person in charge thereof, or
by mailing the notice by U.S. Mail to the last known address of the owner or agent authorized to receive
legal notices for the business, as listed on its license application.
SECTION 350:1455. REVOCATION.
Subd. 1. Suspended Licenses. The City may revoke a license if a cause of suspension in subsection
350:1450 occurs and the license has been suspended at least once before within the preceding 12
months.
Subd. 2. Causes of Revocation. The City may revoke a license if it determines that:
A. A licensee gave false or misleading information in the material submitted to the City during the
application process;
B. A licensee or an employee has knowingly allowed possession, use, or sale of controlled
substances on the premises;
C. A licensee or an employee has knowingly allowed prostitution on the premises;
D. A licensee or an employee knowingly operated the Adult Establishment during a period of time
when the licensee's license was suspended;
E. A licensee has been convicted of an offense listed in subsection 350:1430, subd. 3(D), for which
the time period required in subsection 350:1430, subd. 4, has not elapsed;
F. On two or more occasions within a 12-month period, a person or persons committed an offense
occurring in or on the licensed premises of a crime listed in subsection 350:1430, subd. 3(D) for
which a conviction has been obtained, and the person or persons were employees of the Adult
Establishment at the time the offenses were committed.
G. A licensee or an employee has knowingly allowed any act of sexual intercourse, sodomy, oral
copulation or masturbation to occur in or on the licensed premises.
Subd. 3. Aooeals. The fact that a conviction is being appealed shall have no effect on the revocation of
the license.
Subd. 4. Exceptions. Subsection 350:1455, subd. 2(G), does not apply to adult motels as a ground for
revoking the license unless the licensee or employee knowingly allowed the act of sexual intercourse
sodomy, oral copulation, masturbation, or sexual contact to occur in a public place or within public
view.
MDT-238946vl a ,~
~moo-~ 17 - 4396-
Subd. 5. Granting a License After Revocation. When the City revokes a license, the revocation shall
continue for one year and the licensee shall not be issued an Adult Establishment license for one year
from the date revocation became effective. If, subsequent to revocation, the City finds that the basis for
the revocation has been corrected or abated, the applicant may be granted a license if at least 90 days
have elapsed since the date the revocation became effective. If the license is revoked under subsection
350:1455, subd. 2 (E), an applicant may not be granted another license until the appropriate number of
years required under subsection 350:1430, subd. 4 has elapsed.
Subd. 6. Notice. A revocation by the City shall be preceded by written notice to the licensee and a
public hearing. The notice shall give at least 10 days notice of the time and place of the hearing and
shall state the nature of the charges against the licensee. The notice may be served upon the licensee
personally, or by leaving the same at the licensed premises with the person in charge thereof or by
mailing the notice by U.S. Mail to the last known address of the owner or agent authorized to receive
legal notices for the business, as listed on its license application.
Section 350:1460. PROCEDURES. Issuances, suspensions, revocations, and nonrenewals of Adult
Establishment licenses are governed by the following provisions:
Subd. 1. In the event that the city council proposes not to renew, to revoke, or to suspend the license,
the licensee must be notified in writing of the basis for such proposed revocation or suspension. The
council will hold a hearing for the purpose of determining whether to revoke or suspend the license.
The hearing must be within 30 days of the date of the notice. The city council must determine whether
to suspend or revoke a license within 30 days after the close of the hearing or within 60 days of the date
of the notice, whichever is sooner. The council must notify the licensee of its decision within that
period.
Subd. 2. If the council determines to suspend or revoke a license, the suspension or revocation is not
effective until 15 days after notification of the decision to the licensee. If, within that 15 days, the licensee
files and serves an action in state or federal court challenging the council's action, the suspension or
revocation is stayed until the conclusion of such action.
Subd. 3. If the city council determines not to renew a license, the licensee may continue its business for
15 days after receiving notice of such non-renewal. If the licensee files and serves an action in state or
federal court within that 15 days for the purpose of determining whether the City acted properly, the
licensee may continue in business until the conclusion of the action.
Subd. 4. If the city council does not grant a license to an applicant, then the applicant may commence
an action in state or federal court within 15 days for the purpose of determining whether the City acted
properly. The applicant may not commence doing business unless the action is concluded in its favor.
SECTION 350:1465. TRANSFER OF LICENSE.
A licensee shall not transfer this license to another, nor shall a licensee operate an Adult Establishment under
he authority of a license at any place other than the address designated in the application.
MDT-238946vl 13
MU200-117
-4397-
SECTION 350:1470. SEVERABILITY.
Every section, provision, or part of this Ordinance is declared severable from every other section, provision, or
part thereof to the extent that if any section, provision, or part of this Ordinance be held invalid by a court of
competent jurisdiction it shall not invalidate any other section, provision, or part thereof.
SECTION 350:1475. EFFECTIVE.
This Ordinance shall be effective immediately after publication.
Dated:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL-
PUBLISHED IN THE LAKER
MDT-238946vl 1 ~1.
MU200-117 - 4398-
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE NO..~-2003
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT
RELATES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 350.310 is hereby amended to read as follows:
350.310 Definitions. The following words and terms, whenever they occur in this
Ordinance, are defined as follows:
Add the following as the new Subd. 37, and renumbering the subsequent subdivisions accordingly.
Subd. 37. Day Care Facility, Child. A facility that provides non-medical care to
children under 18 years of are in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance
essential for sustainin.q the activities of daily livin.q or for the protection of the individual on
less than a 24-hour basis. Child day care facility includes commercial and home based day
care.
Section 350.652, Subd. 2 is hereby amended to read as follows:
350.652 "DEST-PUD" Destination Planned Unit Development District.
Subd. 2. Permitted Uses.
~. C.
~ d.
~ e.
~ f.
~. g.
9=. h.
~ i.
F. j.
~ k.
~ I.
F. m.
Fl=. O.
~. p.
~ q.
(~. r.
~. s.
~. t.
~ U.
u=. V.
M=. w.
Adult Establishments
Banks
Barber and Beauty Shops
Business or Trade Schools
Churches
Consignment shops
Day Care
Delicatessen
Drug Store
Grocery Store
Health Clubs, Fitness Centers and Dance Studios
Institutions and Charitable organizations
Liquor Stores
Medical and Dental Clinics
Offices
Private Lodges and Clubs
Public Buildings
Public and private Park and Recreation
Restaurants (Class I, II and Ill)
Retail Business
Service Shops
Theatres
Transit stations
1
-4399-
0 , 0 , O~
-4400-
Ordinance No. __-2003
Passed by the City Council this
day of ,2003.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
Published in The Laker on
Effective on
,2003.
,2003.
3
-4401 -
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sarah Smith, Comm. Development Director
Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
November 18, 2003
Adoption of Land Use Fees by Ordinance
M.S.S. 462.353, Subd. 4 requires that the City's land use fees must be adopted by
ordinance. Presently, these fees are included in the City of Mound Fee Schedule
which is approved annually by resolution as set forth in City Code Section 500.
A draft ordinance has been prepared for consideration and action by the City Council to
adopt the 2003 fee schedule for land use and zoning applications. Be advised that the
proposed fees associated with the adult use ordinance have been included.
Additionally, a new application fee(s) of $350.00 and escrow fee of $500.00 has been
established for stormwater and floodplain alteration permits.
-4402-
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE NO. -2003
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 380 TO THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT
RELATES TO ESTABLISHING LAND USE FEES FOR THE CITY OF MOUND
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 380 ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE FEES, is hereby added to the City
Code to read as follows:
SECTION 380
ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE FEES
380.05
Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to comply with Minnesota
State Statutes, 426.353, Subd. 4, which states that a municipality may
prescribe fees sufficient to defray the costs incurred by it in reviewing,
investigating, and administering an application for an amendment to an
official control established pursuant to Sections 462.351 to 462.364 or an
application for a permit or other approval required under an official control
established pursuant to those sections. Fees as prescribed must be by
ordinance.
380.10
Buildinq and Construction Fees
300.20 Wrecking Permit
Minor building $50
Minor building to be replaced
on same site $50
Single family wood frame $150
Duplex $200
Multiple dwelling: 1st tWO units $200
Each add'l unit $250
Industrial, commercial, institutional:
Total cost of wrecking at $6 for each $500 or fraction
thereof of the market value of such work.
Gas burners:
Not exceeding 99,000 BTU
100,000 - 199,999 BTU
200,000 - 399,999 BTU
400,000 - 599,999 BTU
600,000 - 999,999 BTU
$10
$15
$30
$44
$60
-4403-
Install/remove flammable & combustible liquids and LP tanks
Tank not buried enclosed
500 gallons or less
Over 500 gallons
Tank buried or enclosed
Removal of combustiable/flammable
liquid tank
Removal of storage tanks of
above/below ground liquor gas
$10
$15
$25
$15
$15
311.0
Heating, air conditioning & ventilation
Contract prices $20 min. or 1% of contract price,
whichever is greater
Gas piping $5 for up to 3 openings
$1 for each additional opening
315.20
Trailers
Occupancy permit
Mobile home set-up inspection fee
$100
$75
315.35
Appeal to applicant
$5O
320.00
Public Lands Permit - major
(value +$1000)
*fee applies only if public benefit is derived*
$200
Contractor License Verification
$5
330.20 Building Permits - See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table I-A +
surcharge
Fire suppression - See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table 1-A +
surcharge
Inspection fees - See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table I-A +
surcharge
Plan check fees - See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table 1-A +
surcharge
380.15
Plumbina Permits:
310.00
16B665
Permit Fee for major improvement ($500+) $25
Per fixture fee for major improvement $10
Permit Fee for minor improvement <$300 $15
Permit Fee for minor improvement
$300-$500 5% of improvement cost
-4404-
380.20
380.25
380.30
(Minor Impr. must be done by owner or
310,40
(excluding
licensed contractor)
Per rough-in only $10
Per 100 feet of pipe or fraction thereof $8
Per 100 feet of repair or fraction $5
Outside sewer and/or water inspection $25
Private water well inspection $25
Additional inspections $10
fixture costs)
Wells:
305.00 Wells - per drilling or deepening $65
Buildinq Relocation:
Moving permit fee: not on State or County Highway:
(requires Conditional Use) $350
Moving permit fee: On State or County Highways:
No fee, but required evidence of insurance and refundable $250 cash.
Excavation & Land Reclamation
460.15 Grading plan review fees
*50 cu. yards or less
'51-100 cu. yards
'101-1,000 cu. yards
'1,001-10,000 cu. yards
'10,001-100,000 cu yards
First 10,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea 10,000 cu. yards
or fraction thereof
'100,001-200,000 cu. yards
First 100,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea 10,000 cu. yards
or fraction thereof
'200,001 or more
First 200,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea 10,00 cu. yards
or fraction thereof
Additional plan review, due to changes,
additions, or revisions to approve
plans: Per Hour (Min. ~ hour)
$0
$15
$22
$30
$3O
$15
$165
$9
$255
$4.5O
$30
GRADING PERMIT FEES:
*50 cu. yards or less
'51-100 cu. yards
'101-1,000 cu. yards
First 1,000 cu. yards
$15
$22
$22,50
-44O5-
380.35
380.40
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
$10.50
'1,001-10,000 cu. yards
First 1,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
'10,001-100,000 cu. yards
First 1,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
'101,000 cu. yards or more
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
$117
$9
$198
$4O.5O
$562.50
$22.50
$30/hr.
After hours inspection:Minimum charge (2 hrs).
Re-inspection fees assessed under Provision
of chapter 305 (g) (UBC) $30/hr.
Inspection for which no fee is specified: (Minimum chg. ~ hr.)
Fee for authorizing additional grading under valid permit: Difference
between original and entire project.
Land Use Administration Fees (staff reports, meetings, etc.)
Property File Research Admin. Fee (non-owners) $15.00
Building Permit Deposit (to cover staff review time/non-pickup)
Minor Projects (Value less than $1,000)
Major Projects (Value more than $1,000)
Land Use Application Fee - City Staff I to 3 hours
More than 3 hours
Unauthorized Construction/No Permit Issued
$100.00
$5OO.OO
No Charge
$30.00/hr.
Double Bldg Permit Fee
Subdivision & Zonin,q Fees
330.12 Waiver of Platting Fee
Waiver of Platting Escrow
350.475 Fence Permit
$2O0
$500
$55
350.530
350,525
350.755
375:10
300,15
350.1100
Zoning Variance
Variance escrow
Conditional Use Permit
CUP escrow
Vacation
Stormwater Permit
Stormwater escrow
Floodplain Alteration Permit
Floodplain Alteration escrow
Wetlands Permit
$200
$500
$350
$500
$35O
$3OO
$5OO
$3OO
$5OO
$35O
-4406-
350.520
350.1400
365.05
492.00
493.00
Zoning Amendment
Rezoning escrow
Planned Unit Development
Site Plan Review
Commercial Site Plan Review Escrow
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Minor Subdivision: Lot split
Per lot over 2 lots
Park Dedication Fee:
Escrow deposit - small proj. app.
Escrow deposit - large proj. app.
Adult Establishment License Fee
Police Dept. background check
Sign Permit:
Sign alteration fee: Structural
alteration, up to the 1st $1,000
Temporary Sign Permit
Containers in Right-of-Way
Portable Storage Container
$350
$5OO
$1 ,T00
$35O
$5OO
$350+$15/lot
$350+$15/lot
$25O
$15
$1,100 or 10%
$1,000
$5,OOO
$2,OOO
$65/hr.
$100
$5O
$25
$50
$5O
Passed by the City Council this __day of
2003.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Published in the Laker on
Effective on
,2003.
Mayor Pat Meisel
,2003.
-4407-
Page 1 of 2
==462.353
462.353 Authority to plan.
Subdivision 1. General authority. A municipality
may carry on comprehensive municipal planning activities for
guiding the future development and improvement of the
municipality and may prepare, adopt and amend a comprehensive
municipal plan and implement such plan by ordinance and other
official actions in accordance with the provisions of sections
462.351 to 462.364.
Subd. 2. Studies and reports. In exercising its
powers under subdivision 1, a municipality may collect and
analyze data, prepare maps, charts, tables, and other
illustrations and displays, and conduct necessary studies. A
municipality may publicize its purposes, suggestions, and
findings on planning matters, may distribute reports thereon,
and may advise the public on the planning matters within the
scope of its duties and objectives.
Subd. 3. Appropriation and contracts. A
municipality may appropriate moneys from any fund not dedicated
to other purposes in order to finance its planning activities.
A municipality may receive and expend grants and gifts for
planning purposes and may enter into contracts with the federal
and state governments or with other public or private agencies
in furtherance of the planning activities authorized by sections
462.351 to 462.364.
Subd. 4. Fees. A municipality may prescribe fees
sufficient to defray the costs incurred by it in reviewing,
investigating, and administering an application for an amen~ent
to an official control established pursuant to sections 4i!161121~i~51!
an application for a permit or other appr°gal
J~J'ed ~nder an official control established pursuant to those
sections. Except as provided in subdivision 4a, fees as
prescribed must be by ordinance. Fees must be fair, reasonable,
and proportionate to the actual cost of the service for which
the fee is imposed. A municipality shall adopt management and
accounting procedures to ensure that fees are maintained and
used only for the purpose for which they are collected.
If a dispute arises over a specific fee imposed by a
municipality related to a specific application, the amount of
the fee must be deposited and held in escrow, and the person
aggrieved by the fee may appeal under section 462.361. An
approved application may proceed as if the fee had been paid,
pending a decision on the appeal.
Subd. 4a. Fee schedule allowed. A municipality that
collects an annual cumulative total of $5,000 or less in fees
under this section may prescribe the fees or refer to a fee
schedule in the ordinance governing the official control or
permit. A municipality may adopt a fee schedule under this
subdivision by ordinance or resolution, either annually or more
frequently, following publication of notice of proposed action
on a fee schedule at least ten days prior to a public hearing
held to consider action on or approval of the fee schedule. A
municipality that collects a cumulative total in excess of
$5,000 in fees under this section may prescribe a fee schedule
by ordinance by following the notice and hearing procedures
specified in this subdivision.
http ://www.revisor.leg. state, mn. u s/cgi-bin/get st~- 4408 -' 11/19/2003
-4409-
Mound Public Safety Facility
FFE -Fumishings and Equipment
Furnishing I Equipment
FFE
Contigency Released for FFE
Furniture. Metro System
All Steel Modular Office Furniture
Extra Fabric for future Workstations
Used Furniture Purchase. Prudential
Miscellaneous Office Furniture
File & Evidence Storage. Mid America
Carousel
Cabinets, Sorters
Cigarette Ashtrays. Com
Ashtray Recepticles (10)
Gear Grid
Firefighter Turnout Gear Racks
Sales of existing gear racks to Mora F.D.
Training Tables. Folding
(22) for training room
Bought Furniture. Sam's Club
Gorilla Storage Racks & Trash Cans
Bought Furniture - Appliance Smart
Stackable Washer-Dryer
Kitchenette Appliances - upstairs
Wabash Valley
Benches & Tables
Subtotal
Audio Visual Systems. Training
Applied Business Communications
Audio/Video System for Training Room
Security and Access System / CCTV
Applied Business Communications
Card Reader Security Solution
Closed Circuit Surveillance - CCTV
Paging System -3 Zone
Applied Business Communications
Overhead Single Zone Paging System
!$
$
Budget
$
$
Actual
85,000.00
30,000.00
66,561.10
282.44
5,030.00
$
$
6,647.20
3,137.98
1,383.97
$
$
10,326.24
(3,795.00)
5,400.00 (est.)
1,598.05
649.00
1,400.00 (est.)
115,000.00
15,000.00
$
$
3,184.35
01,805.33
$
14,400.00
14,800.00
7,500.00
11,950.00
24,620.00
2,935.00
-4410-
Mound Public l~afety Facility
FFE - Furnishings and Equipment
Furnishing I Equipment IBudget
Voice & Data Cabling $ 18,500.00
Applied Business Communications
Voice & Data Category 6 Cable
TV & Audio Visual Cabling
Applied Business Communications
CATV Solutions
Computer Network
Police and Fire Computer network
Jim Brand, Inc.
Telephone System
Frontier Communications
Public Safety Facility
Public Safety I City Hall
Radio Communications
Action Radio
Install Base Radio Infrastructure
Subtotal I $
I$
2,500.00
$
8,700.00
$
17,200.00
$
$
$
83,800.00 [ $
198,8oo.oo I s
Actual (Projected)
20,600.00
3,580.00
(30,812.41) Pending
Review
17,200.00
24,686.88
5,930.00 Grant $
95,685.00 I
197,490.33
Note: Budget total does not include computer network'
11/21/2003
-4411 -
4.
5.
6.
City of Mound
11/06/03
Communications $vstern $tudv and Proposal
Communication system project description, justification and summary
Communications "Needs Assessment" detail sheets
· Summary spreadsheet of the needs for all departments
· Summary spreadsheet of needs for public safety facility and city hall
· Detail breakdown of communications needs (all departments)
Phone service/dial tone/internet cost analysis (refer to cost analysis)
Phone system Cost proposal summary (seep hone proposal spreadsheet)
Phone system interconnect cost (see phone proposal spreadsheet)
Phone systems Features overview
· All of the proposed phone systems (refer to phone proposal spreadsheet)
would allow us to maintain our existing DID (phone) numbers.
· In all proposals, the phone system main control box would be installed in
public safety facility.
· By installing phone system in the public safely facility the new phone
system would have battery and generator backup power.
All of the proposed phone systems support similar basic needs (i.e.
number of phones, voice mail boxes, caller I.D., etc.)
All phone systems are digital technology and/or voice over I.P. technology
The phone quote/proposals are based upon our phone needs summary data
and our phone quantity requests. Final numbers of phones will be adjusted
as necessary prior to ordering.
Any of the phone systems that wilt serve both facilities require fiber
and/or copper cable connecting the public safety facility and city hall.
All proposals include training of users
All phone systems are designed to utilize T-1 "shared access" technology
General Information
· Installation of phone system in public safety and city hall and "cutover"
can be done independently if necessary.
· The cabling between the public safety facility and city hall would be
necessary to install a computer network. Now or in the future.
All of these phone systems have similar and very capable automated
attendant systems.
All of these phone system suppliers Offer purchase, lease, or rental as
options to consider.
-4412-
2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, Minnesota 55364
To: Kandis Hanson, Mound City Manager
From: Greg Pederson, Fire Chief
Subject: Phone and Internet Systems and Service Analysis
Date: November 20, 2003
Included with this memo is a packet of detailed information, and a recommendation
regarding a phone system and phone services for the new public safety facility inclUding
city hall. The information that follows is a brief overview of a rather complicated project.
Background: The public safety facility budget currently includes $17,500 appropriated
to purchase a new phone system to be used by the police and fire departments. As part of
the building project, it is our plan to purchase and install a new technology phone system
that operates on a digital technology platform. This will be a modern efficient system.
The city hall today operates on a phone system called "Centrex" which is owned and
operated by Frontier Telephone Co. All of the inner workings of the Centrex system are
located at a Frontier facility, and maintained by Frontier. The phone handsets are owned
by the City of Mound. This is old technology, but certainly usable. The city pays Frontier
a monthly fee to use this Centrex system. The city budget does not currently have funds
appropriated for upgrading its phone system.
Throughout the various departments within the city today, there is a conglomeration of
individual phone lines that provides "dial tone" and internet service to all departments.
The current configuration of individual phone lines is extremely difficult to analyze or
understand. This individual phone line concept is old technology is also very expensive.
Communications study: Based upon your authorization, I have analyzed every (seems
like) available option for both a phone system and phone service. This extensive analysis
included a separate evaluation for both a). new phone system and b). phone service (dial
tone options). As shown on the attachments to this memo, I have received numerous
proposals on phone systems hardware.
Also as part of this project we have considered other options for phone service or dial
tone. As it stands today, Frontier Telephone is the primary dial tone provider in this area.
Other service providers such as Focal and X-O will be invading Frontier's territory soon.
Frontier has a solid foothold in this area, and therefore they have not been forced to be
overly competitive on rates.
1
-4413-
Options considered: With this study and as part of the overall project, I have gathered
information on several options. The options for a phone system that were considered:
· Purchase and install a phone system for the public safety facility only.
· Purchase and install a phone system for public safety facility and city hall.
· Purchase and install a phone system that included all facilities/departments.
· Continue to use the Centrex system for all facilities
The options considered for phone service/dial tone included:
· Leave the existing individual phone lines in place as they are today for all
departments.
· Change to digital channel "shared access" T-1 technology using Frontier as
the service provider.
· Change to digital channel technology using Focal as the service provider.
Conclusion/recommendation: The public safety facility and city hall complex (both
buildings) would benefit greatly by purchasing and installing its own phone system. By
eliminating the Centrex system and changing over to a new technology phone system and
digital channel phone service, the city would save significant dollars. In the new phone
system, the public safety facility and city hall would share a common phone system and
digital phone service.
The city could save approximately $1,000.00 per month on phone bills and improve both
the phone system functionality and phone service. The return on investment (ROI) would
be less than one year (refer to financial summary cost savings and justification). The
approximate cost for the city hall portion of this phone system would be $8,000.00.
I suggest we purchase a Modular ICS Nortel phone system at a cost of $24,686.00, from
Frontier Telephone Co. and change our dial tone service to digital T-1 technology. The
financial information and justification is attached.
Respectfully,
~ego~ed'~erSon(~~
Fire Chief
2
-4414-
City_ of Mound
November 20, 2003
Phone System and Phone Service Financial Justification
Phone Service (dial tone and internet) Costs
· Current phone service costs for entire city, all departments,
approximate monthly cost = $3,109
· Proposed phone service costs for entire city, all departments,
approximate monthly cost = $2,049
Monthly savings = $1,059 Total Annual Savings (first year) = $12,719
Note: Second year savings would be slightly less due to phone system
maintenance agreement monthly cost of $107.75. Reduce annual savings by
$1,293.00. Annual savings per year after first year becomes $11,426.
Phone System Costs
· Nortel Modular ICS Digital phone system = $24,686.88
Approximate cost allocation: Public Safety Facility = $16,540 City Hall = $ 8,147
Return On Investment (payback):
8 months
11/20/03
GSP
-4415-
oE
E
0
-4416-
0
0
-4417-
-4418-
-4419-
-4420-
-4421 -
-4422-
E
-4423-
~8§
-4424-
m
E
-4425-
-4426-
'o
t-
c-
×
0
000000000000000
-0
000000000 00 O00
0 0 00000000
c" 0
.~_ 0
E ~ ~0
o 8
00000000 ~
0~~00~
~ o
~ 0
00000~00
OO 0 0 O~
~ 00
-4427-
Phone System Cost Proposals
Public Safety Facility I City Hall
October-03
Phone System Phone Syi~ei~ Public Safety No. of City Hall No. of Lease Interconnect
VendorlsuppIier Manufacturer T~pe Cost Phones Cost P:-,~es Total Cost CosUMo Cable Cost Comments
Ideacom Inter-Tel 128 Digital $ 15,810.00 45
Mid-America Wireless Wan & $ 372.00 64 Voice Mail Boxes
64 Port System ! (60) month 18 month warranty
~ Caller ID
Ideacom Inter-Tsi 128, Digital 45 ' $ 17,620.00 18 $ 33,430.00 $ 786.00 200 Voice Mail Boxes
Mid-America Wireless Wan & w/IP Phones
64 Port System (60) month 18 month warranty
Caller ID
Ideacom Inter-Tel 512 Digital 45 $ 20,330.00 18 $ 36,140.00 $ 649.00 $ 4,000.00 200 Voice Mail Boxes
Mid-America Axxess
(est.) 18 month warranty
Caller ID
Twin Cities 3 Com NBX 100 Voice Over 45 18 $ 32,125.00 Available $ 4,000.00 1500 Voice Mail Boxes
Comrnworks, Inc. System-Wan/ IP-
Internal Ethernet Based Proposal (est.) 24 month warranty
Did Not
Include
NOVA Toshiba Digital $ 21,485.05 38
Communications CTX100 - Avaitable Usa (7) existing
Strata System Proposal phones
Did Not Caller ID
Include
NOVA Toshiba Digital 38 $1 14,904.15 18 $ 38,389.20 Available $ 4,562.74 Use (7) existing
Communications CTX670
System ! Proposal phones
Did Not Caller ID
Include
Connectivity Inter-Tel 128 Digital $ 26,714.94 44 $ 6,431.13 Available 200 Voice Mail Boxes
Solutions Axxess System Proposal Caller ID option
Did Not 24 month warranty
Include
Connectivity Inter-Tel 128 Digital 44 $ 6,431.13 18 $ 33,146.07 Available $ 6,532.80 200 Voice Mail Boxe
Solutions Axxess System Proposal Caller ID
Did Not 24 month warranty
include
Frontier Nortel Digital $ 19,625.56 44
Modularics Available Up to 1,000 Voice
Proposal Mail Boxes
Did Not Caller ID
Include Analog Ports
Frontier ModularN°rtellcs Digital 44 $ 5,061.32 18 $ 24,686.88 Available Up to 1,000 Voice
Proposal Mail Boxes
Did Not Caller ID
Include Analog Ports
Frontier Nortel Business Digital/Voice $ 25,890.15 44
Communications Over IP Available Up to 1,000 Voice
Manager 400 Internal Based Proposal Mail Boxes
Option Did Not Caller ID
Include Analog Ports
Frontier Nortel Business Digital/Voice 44 $ 5,329.81 $ 31,219.96 Available
Communicatins Over IP Up to 1,000 Voice
Manager 400 Internal Based Proposal Mail Boxes
Option Did Not Caller ID
Include Analog Ports
Central NEC Aspire Digital & Voice 45 18 $ 23,194.00 $ 526.50 $ 3,471.00 200 Voice Mail Boxes
Telephone Digital VOIP Over IP
Interoet Based Caller ID
Option 12 month warranty -
parts and labor
11/6/20o3
-4428-
~' A CttLzens CornmUnicatt°nS com~
Date:
Mound - Public Safety & City Hall
Modular ICS (MICS)
INVESTMENT SUMMARY ' Net Price
Equipment: $ 20,486.88
installation: $ 4,200.00
Total: $ 24r686'88
1110312003
Plus additional sales/use taxes.
Item Descri )ti°r~ Unit Price Qty
MICS 6.1 w/CalIPilot 150 (48 Mbx) Bundle - US $ 4,471.63 1
CallP ot Voice Messa~lincj Mailboxes- 16 $ 651.02 1
Combination Fiber 6-port Services Cartridge $ 766.26 1
Dicjital Trunk Interface Card $ 1,749.92 1
Fiber Station Module $ 1,142.86 2
Norstar Analo9 Station Module $ 1,361.45 2
T7316E Telephone Set - Charcoal (with Feature Plate) $ 4,206.11 22
T24 Key Indicator Module-Charcoal $ 506.78 3
T7208 Telephone Set - Charcoal (with Feh_ture Plate) $ 3,299.94 20
T7100 Telephone Set - Charcoal (with Feature Plate) $ 2,330.91 20
Subtotal $ 20,486.88
Notes:
Labor is est mated at 60 hours ($70 i!~)~ii~'~'i~!Udes ~ystem deSign, professional
,nstallat~on, and tra,n~ng (end,user:a~la~l~t~ative)~ As cenflgured, the system ,s capable of
I handline u~ to 64 Dieital stationSi~i~!~i~i~i~iii~!~rai Ah~we¢ing p°sitions), 16 Analog Stations
(for Fa~(~u~ch nes &~E o c ), 24 boxes.
Customer Signature:
Approval Date:
-4429-
THIS PAGE IS
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
-4430-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
PLANNING REPORT
To: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Date: November 19, 2003
Subject: Variance - front setback for second story addition / remodel project
Owner: Brian and Kris Beniek
Case No: 03-50
Location: 6017 Ridgewood Road
Legal Description: Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands
PID: 23-117-24-43-0031
Zoning: R-1 Residential
Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND
Brian and Kris Beniek are requesting variance approval to add a 28' x 46' second story
addition (1288) SF to their home located at 6017 Ridgewood Road. The current
structure, constructed in 1974-1975, includes a 1-story walkout with an attached side
loaded garage on the north side and a lakeside deck on the south side.
Presently, there are nonconforming conditions associated with the property. According
to City Code Section 350:420, Subd. 9, non-conforming principal and accessory
structures may be expanded, enlarged, or modified, and conforming structures can be
added provided that the use of the parcel is conforming to district regulations and
provided that the expansion, enlargement or modification meets the current zoning
regulations and no other non-conformities are created.
The proposed addition, to be constructed over the footprint of the original house, meets
the 50-foot setback requirement on the lakeside as well as the side setbacks
requirements of 6-feet and 10-feet reSpectively. However, because the northwest
corner of existing house is 19 feet from the front property line and the setback
requirement for the R-1 District is 30 feet, a small portion of the proposed second floor
addition will be nonconforming.
-4431 -
The requested variance is described as follows:
Required Existinq Re(3uested Variance
Front setback (north)
30 feet 1 foot 19 feet 11 feet
Details regarding the project are outlined in the submitted plans (ie. building plans,
survey, application, etc.) that have been included as attachments.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the
City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the
ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the
use of his or her land.
60-DAY PROCESS
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are
required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance
application was received and deemed to be complete on or around November 17,
2003.
NOTIFICATION
City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by
mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that this activity was
completed on or about November 20, 2003.
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Project plans were forwarded to all involved City Departments for review.
DISCUSSION
Over the course of the past year, the applicants have been contemplating a
remodel project including the construction of a second story. They ordered an
updated survey and prepared plans on the basis that the addition was consistent
with the City Code. Upon the submittal of the building permit materials the week
of November 3rd it was noted that the northwest corner of the house (and
addition) do not meet the required front setback of 30-feet therefore a variance
would be required.
2
-4432-
The property fronts Ridgeview Road to the north and is bordered by Lake
Minnetonka on the south side. The subject property is adjacent to residential
use(s) on both the west and east sides.
Resolution No. 74-261 was approved on September 10, 1974 for a 1500 SF lot
size variance and 2-foot side and 3-foot rear setback variance(s) for the garage.
At the time the variance was approved, the principal structure (house) was
proposed in a conforming location according to the A-1 District regulations
including the required 20-foot front setback.
Building Permit No. 3505 was issued on September 30, 1974 for a 1-story
walkout (3 bedroom) and attached double garage.
At such time as the A-1 Residential District changed to the R-1 Residential
District, the principal structure front setback increased from 20 feet to 30 feet.
Resolution No. 90-30 was approved on February 20, 1990 for a variance to
authorize a 1-foot setback for a one-stall garage addition on the north side and
also authorized the existing non-conforming lot size and structural setback
violations.
Resolution No. 95-68 was approved on July 25, 1995 for a variance to recognize
the nonconforming issues on the property and to allow construction of an entry
addition on the west side and a lower level deck on the lake / south side.
The subject property is irregularly shaped.
The subject property slopes downward towards the lake.
10. Ridgewood Road is curved along the front property line.
11.The second story addition has been situated to accommodate the internal
functions of the house including shared use of the plumbing system between the
proposed 1st floor laundry room and second floor bathroom that are located in
the northwest corner of the home.
12. If the addition were to be modified to meet the 30-foot restriction in this area, the
new staircase would likely need to be relocated further south which could push
the second floor addition outside of the original building footprint and closer to
the west line.
13. Cutting off the northwest corner of the proposed second story addition could
negatively affect the overall architectural appeal of the home.
-4433-
14. According to the calculation sheet prepared by Coffin & Gronberg, dated
September 16, 2002, hardcover On the subject property is presently 45.4 percent
and therefore exceeds the 40 percent allowance by 439 square feet which is
considered to be an existing condition. Hardcover is expected to decrease by
approximately 24 SF as a result of the proposal. Members of the Planning
Commission may wish to discuss with the applicant whether there are additional
ways to remove hardcover.
15. The subject property is irregularly shaped and includes varied topography.
16.An addition on the south side of the existing house is not feasible due to the
lakeshore setback requirements. Additionally, an addition on this side would
likely increase hardcover.
17.Any addition and/or modification on the north side of the house will require a
variance due to the existing 1-foot front setback for the attached garage.
18. Construction of an addition on the west side of the garage is not possible as the
garage is side loaded and the area is used for parking.
19. The proposed improvements will enhance the property and will improve the
livability of the home.
20.
At the time the home was constructed in 1974-1975, the City Code required a
20-foot front setback and the second floor addition, as proposed, maintains the
same front setback as the original structure in this location.
21 .The majority of the second story addition is in a conforming location per the R-1
requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of
the 11-foot front setback variance to allow a second story addition / remodel project at
6017 Ridgewood Road subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land
use requests.
4
-4434-
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
Due to the unique circumstances associated with the application and seasonal
construction issues, the variance application from Brian and Kris Beniek has been
advanced and will be heard by the Planning Commission at its November 24, 2003
meeting and is also included on the November 25, 2003 City Council agenda at which
time Staff will present the Planning Commission's recommendation. Members of the
Planning Commission and City Council are advised that the "concurrent review" was
discussed in advanced with Mayor Meisel and City Manager Hanson and was also
discussed at the November 17, 2003 Planning Commission meeting.
-4435-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood ROad, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620
VARIANCE
APPLICATION
2003 Application Fee: $200.00
Planning Commission Date I/{'~.~~)
City
Council Date II 13q[
Escrow Deposit: $500.00
case No.
Please type or print legibly
SUBJECT Address C-
PROPER~
LEGAL Lot / ¢ Block
DESC.
Subdivision
PID~ ~ ~/~ ~ ~3 ~ 3) Plat~
ZONING DISTRICT ~ R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
PROPER~ Name ~',
OWNER
Address G~ ~..~ ~¢~ ~¢.
Phone(H)...
APPLICANT Name... ~
(IF OTHER
THAN Address ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ v ': ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~
OWNER)
Phone (H). ~
PI ~n made for zomng, vanance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? Yes (,.'") No (). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Variance Application
(12/30/02) Page 1 of 3
-4436-
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (,/¢. If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS:
REQUIRED REQUESTED
(or existing)
VARIANCE
Front Yard: ((J~) S E W ) z, c, ft. ~ ¢ ft. t ,o ft.
Side Yard: ( N Sd~ W ) ~ . ft. ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E(~ /O' ft. ft. ft.
Rear Yard: ( N(~)E W ) ¢-'~" ft. ft. ft.
Lakeside: ( N (~E W ) ~---.~' ft. ft. ft.
· (NSEW) ft. ft. ft.
Street Frontage:
Lot Size: S'~''' ~''
Hardcover.'
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes (,"~, No (). If no, sp'~ify each non-conforming use:
5. Which unique physical characteristics of
uses permitted in that zoning district?
~.ubject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
( ) too narrow
( ) too small
( ) too shallow
Please describe:
(NO topography
( )drainage ~
('/~ shape
soil
(?0 existing situation
othei': specify
Variance Application
(12/30/02).Page 2 of 3
-4437-
c***.o.
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ("~/No (). If yes, explain:
/
,/
7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes (), No (,--')~. If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in
this petition? Yes (--"), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by law.
Owner's Signature
Date
Applicant's Signature.,¢~ .~...... ~.~~
Variance Application
(12/30/02) Page 3 of 3
Date. /~- 1-7-3
-4438-
FROM :
/
GRONBERG & RSSOCIATES
FAX NO. : 952 473 4435
CITY OF MOUND
H, ARDCOVER CALCyLAT!O~$
(iMPERViOUS SURFACE COVERAGE)
PR'OPERTYADDRESS: ~'~/7 //~"¢~,~'~¢0 ~f~4¢
Now. 19 2003 04:32PM P1
OWNER'S NAME:
LOT AREA
LOT AREA ~ [ 1~7
LOT AREA
SQ. FT. X 30% = (for alt lots) ..............
SQ; FT;"X 40%'-='"(for CCt~ Of'Rid'cb'rd°) ....... I ~Z4,¢ I'
SQ. FC ';X 15% = (for detached buildings only) , .
*Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as
outlined,in Zon!ng Ordioan. ce Section 350;j 225,Su,bd:.6. B.:.I. (see back). A plan must be submitted
and approved by the Building Official.
HOUSE
DETACHED BLDGS
(GARAGE/SHED)
DRIVE'WAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
DECKS Open decks (1/4" rain,
opening b(~tween boards) with
pervioue surface under are
not counted es hardcovar
OTHER ~AIN tN~
LENGTR WIDTH
SO FT
TOTAL HousJ~ ...... '.. -' ................
X = .
TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS .................
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC '
X
X =
TOTAL DECK
l~/~- L.r,
TOTAL OTHER
Z37
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ~ I
UNDER cate difference.),.~ .,., -;. ,-,r ~ .~.,..; . ,. ;., . :.-., ..,,.-~., . ~., ,..-, .......
PREPARED BY_.~_R~N_~ ( ~t~:~_~--,1~T¢¢,, lng. DATE
'or-
.-r
o
--q~.
o~0
00~
Z
-444O-
6/12 INT. PITCH (START 1.-o,, FROM REAR CORNER)
o..
-4441 -
EXISTING GARAGE
! WASH ri1
DRY
__,L__ j,,-.,. ~1,.
NEW LAUN./ENTRY
¥ FROM EXISTING BEDROOM
CLOSET
18" FLR TRUSSES 16" O.C.
SET TO CLEAR EXISTING VAULTED
ROOF FRAMING
11'- 6"
r'-04
o=~
oc I
O~ =
~Of'~
I I ~R~ .,,
I I T?
8 ~ II m % SET TO CLEAR EXIS~NG VAULTED
~' I I ~ R ROOF' FRAMING
=~ II ~ o~
~ II ~m . t
~ > U___- 8 OUTMNE OF EXISITNG HOUSE WALL TO BE REMO~
m~"- IJJxo ~ ~MO~ ~NDO~ AND DOORS OUT TO SAME--
~= I~ ~ / ,~ox. ~oc,~o,s /
~z .I.q~tl ~2} 1-3/4 x 9-1/~ M.L HOR
"~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , , ' ~~ ~ ~,.~
8'- 10"
30x60 TUB
W/SHWR
12'- 0"
0.1- .~,
0
ROOF TRUSSES
24" O.C.
<0 ;o
ROOF TRUSSES
24" O.C,
VAULTED TRUSSES
24" O.C.
(3.5 INT. VAULT)
R~S
CLOSET
PKT
FRMG
~'-~ SHWR
DECK
15'- 8"
28'-0"
16'-0"
-4443-°
~PORTING GABLE END
TRUSS W/TURNED ROOF
JACKS 24" O.C. (SEE ELEV.)
12'- 0"
OUTLINE OF 3'-0" EXTENSI(
BELOW (ROOF OVER - SEE
12'- 3"
O0 ~:::0
1.11
0
~,PPROX. FLR TO FLR SEPERATION (VERIFY
8'-1 1/8"
Z
rq
mm
-4444-
ZO
..-fl rq
EINl-1
(did s'nvM .... "
ON~NIY l 3~..'"
3NOJ.$,k3)l
AaA.~IFIS <~'~) '... ......
· V~ ~O~HS
~' .,,-""- ~)NI/$1X]
NO
l~o9#
~ ~$nOH
,9NI.LSIX3.
.L-J9_-I OZ:'= ,,I, :~!"1¥9S
~:00~ '91, B99IN=I-Ld~IS :=I.LVO
· ONI 'gB_~IeNOB~_ '~ NI=I=IO0 :Aa Ci~UVd3ad
avou aooM~ea~a/..~,0g A:4ABIg$ JO m. vm:~u.u~o -~o ,kaoo
7~-26~
9-1o-7~
RESOLUTION NO. 74-261
RE~OLUTION GRANTING LOT SIZE, ~IDE AND.
REAR YARD VARIAN0~B
(Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands)
wHEREAs, the owner of Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands has requested lot
size, side-yard and rear-yard v~riances in order to build a
garage, and
WHEREAS, the planning 0ommission has recommended a lot size variance of
1,500 sq. fi, a side yard variance of two feat, and a rear yard
variance of three feet with the stipulation that the plane be
followed as presented, and
WHEREAS, it appears to be the beet use of the land,
N~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CIT~ OOUNOIL OF MOUND, MOUND,
MINNESOTA:
That the following variances be granted provided all other
requirements are met:
1. A lot size variance of 1~500 square feet
2. A side yard variance of two feet
5- A rear yard variance of three feet.
Adopted by the Council this 10th day of September, 1974.
74-261
9-10-74
-4446-
Pl.t of Survey
for John T. Appelen /
oF Lot. 18, Block 6, The HiEhlands "./
Hennep~n County~ Minnesota
/
/
V
Certificate of Survey:
! hereby certify that this is
a true and correct representati, on
of a survey of the boundaries of
Lot 18, Block 6, The tlt. ghlands,
the location of all e×ist~ng
buildings, if any, thereon, and
the proposed locations or' two
proposed buildinf~. It does not
purport to show other ~mprovements
or encroachment~s.
Land Surveyor and Planner
Long Imke, Minnesota
Scale: 1" = AO'
~ate : 8-12-74
. : Iron marker found
o : Iron marker set
-4447-
NAME OF: APPLICANT
ADDRESS
INTEREST IN PROPERTY
APPLICATION FOFI VARIANCE VILLAGE OF MOUND
FEE $, /
FEE OWNER (if other than applicant)
ADDRESS
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY ~O//~ /~'/~'~ ~O~)
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~I OF PROPERTY P'la~ 6163.O Parce'l 2660
LO-I- I ~ ., BI-- 0 ~ /~ ~ ..,
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE IN REQUIREMENT FOR FRONT YARD J
REASON:
OTHER {describe)
(Attach a survey or scale drawing showing the location of the proposed building in
relation to lot lines, other buildings on the property and on adjoining properties
and streets.)
ADDRESS ..~'~/.~ ~l~'~/-'~-- ~'~,/ /~/'~/~¢/~-~1'
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Recommended variances
DATE August 29, 1974
COUNCIL ACTION Granted variances
RESOLUTION NO. 74-261
DATE September 10, 1974
A BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE APPLIED FOR WITHIN 1 YR. FROM THE DATE
OF THIS RESOLUTION OR IT BECOMES NULL AND VOID.
-4448-
VILLAGE OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
N_o 3505
Sewer Units O.K: No
OWNER ..J 0 ~4 TV ~-'. /0 P~ ~ Z. &-. A/ DATE
ADDRESS
BUILDER & ,~RCHITECT
ADDRESS '3'-'°&'/ ~ J/'..Cc~.~--' "~.,~-~--, .... PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
S?REET ADDRESS ~ o I '7 _~,~,~-,, ~-~-.--~.~ ~ ·
ADDITION
PLAT (_. / C, ~ o PARCEl_ ,.1.(. (. o
LOT /~ BLOCK L.
ESTIMA:i'ED VALUE '~,?'o., ~,~,.
TO BE USED AS
APPLICANT MUST FURNISH TH~
TO BE COMPLETED
FOLLOWING:
1. One'plot plan showing dimension of lot ~r~.s1~'¢/~l location of building on same.
The Building Inspector may i~n~.~i,~kC!..l~r~tJ!'o.O~:as, k~,:~r a regist~ su~y.
3 One nlot pl~'.shb~ng:'[he)loc~{loh ~nd"size;°f'"'~l! septic ~kg, d~s~ools and
State the nature an~;~ent o~ work. For any new construcU~n, one pIo[.s~owi~ ~
dimenslon o~ lot or lots and location o~ buildin~ on same must ae su~mitteo. ~ne
Building Inspector in his discretion may ask for a registered survey and plans and
specifications.
[-I ALTERATION O REMODELING · ~NEW CONSTP, UCTION ~/RE$1DENTIAL D MULTI-DWELLING [] CON~[RClAL
[] INDUSTRIAL [] BREEZEWAY ["l PORCH [] GARAGE ' [] ADDITION [] FINISH ATTIC [] FINISH BASEMENT
PLUMBING PERMIT NEEDED:.
PLUMBING 1-1
In cnse permit is granted, I hereby agree to do the proposed work in accordance with
descripUon above set forth and according to the provisions of all ordinances of the Village
of Mound and of all statutes of the State of~',Minnes°ta in such cases, made and provided.
FEE /J. ~,. ,~o
-APPLICANT
~ DATE ~'~ -[/ -~ ~ t'~'["l 4'
APPROVED:
BUILDING INS PECTOR -4449 DATE
37
February 20, 1990
RESOLUTION #90-30
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW
A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR
LOT 18t BLOCK 6, THE HIGHLANDSt PID %23-117-24-43 0031,
(6017 Ridgewood Road), P&Z CASE NO. 90-904
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a 29 foot front
yard setback variance to allow construction of a one story garage
addition to an existing attached two stall, one story, garage,
for Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands, PID #23-117-24-43 0031, and
WHEREAS, a variance was previously granted for this
property in 1974, Resolution #74-261, allowing a lot area of
8,027 square feet, a 5 foot front yard setback, a 6 foot and 10
foot side yard setback and a 50 foot (plus) lakeshore setback,
and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1
Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code
requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard
setback, a 50 foot lakeshore setback, and a 10 and a 6 foot side
yard setback for "lots of record", and
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that
alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful,
nonconforming residential property when the alterations will
improve the livability thereof, but the alteration may not
increase the number of units, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
request and does recommend approval due to topography and shape
of the lot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city Council of
the city of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The city does hereby authorize a front yard setback of 1
foot for the property located at Lot 18, Block 6, The
Highlands, PID #23-117-24-43 0031.
2. The City 'Council authorizes the 'existing nonconforming lot
size and structural setback violations and authorizes the
alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404,
Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding
that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject
to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
-4450-
38
February 20, 1990
It is determined that the livability of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the
following alterations to a nonconforming use of the property
to afford the owner reasonable use of his land.
To construct a one story pie shaped garage addition
approximately 840 square feet in size, setback 1 foot
from the front property line (approximately 12'6" from
the curb) per Exhibit A.
Upon the condition that 70% of the garage will be below
grade, with only 2 to 4 feet of the building visible at
street level.
This variance is granted for property legally described as:
Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands, PID #23-117-24-43 0031 (6017
Ridgewood Road).
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to
Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
Se
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs
for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued
until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was mOved by Councilmember
Jensen and seconded by Councilmember Ahrens.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Ma~or
Attest: City Clerk
-4451 -
July 25, 1995
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ENTRY ADDmON
AND A DECK AT
6017 RIDGEWOOD ROAD
LOT 18, BLOCK 6, THE ltlGI::ILANDS, PID//23-117-24 43 0031
P&Z CASE//95-24
WItEREAS, the owners, Gene & Brenda Peterson, have applied for a variance to
recognize the following nonconforming issues, to allow construction of a two story entry
addition and a lower level deck on the lakeside of the dwelling:
Proposed/
HOUSE Existing Required Variance
Front, north 1' 30' 29'
Side, east 5.5' 6' .5'
Side, west 9' 10' 1'
Lakeside (deck) 48.5' 50' 1.5'
SHED
Side, east 0' +/- 4' 4'
Lakeside 38' +/- 50' 12'
LOT AREA 8,027 I0,000 1,973
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 Single Family Residential
Zoning District which according to City Code requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a front
yard setback of 30 feet, side yard setbacks of 6 and 10 feet, and a lakeshore setback of 50 feet
to the ordinary high water level of 929.4, and;
WHEREAS, impervious surface coverage is conforming at 40% for a lot of record and
the 'existing grading and green space create an adequate filter dtrip to accommodate the
stormwater from this site, as required by the ordinance, and;
WHEREAS, two previous variances have been granted for this property by Resolutions
#74-261, and g90-30, and;
WHEREAS, the existing entryway has a very poor layout. The landing is small and
is located directly adjacent to a stairway that causes a dangerous condition that the applicant
refers to in their request, and;
-4452-
153
RESOLUTION 95-68 JULY 25, 1~95
WItEREAS, the proposed encroachment of one foot into the side yard setback has a
minimal impact on the adjoining property, and;
WFI~.REAS, the proposed 10 foot deck extends out slightly farther than the existing
upper deck, and results in a nonconforming lakeshore setback of approximately 47 feet. The
10 foot width provides a functional deck and is a minimal encroachment into this setback. The
adjacent property to the west is slightly closer to the lake, and;
WltEREAS, both the house and shed are built into a bluff, and a variance will also need
to be recognized to the bluff setback requirement. The shed is located at the toe of the bluff,
and;
WltEREAS, the existing nonconforming 8' x 10' storage shed was recently
reconstructed, which did not require a building permit, however, does require a variance due
to its location. Due to topography, and the recreational use of the lake it is reasonable to have
a shed in this location. The shed is tucked into the hillside and was existing prior to the
adoption of the Shoreland Management Ordinance. Also, the shed walls help retain the hillside,
and;
WltEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously
recommended approval, with the following findings of fact:
If the size of the entry addition was reduced, it would not allow for windows
which are needed in to allow for natural lighting.
A shed at the toe of the bluff is a reasonable use due to topography.
- The walls of the shed assist in retaining the hillside. ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows: ~
1. The City does hereby grant a variance to recognize the nonconforming issues as listed
below. This variance approval shall include the 1 foot s~de yard setback variance for e
· entry addition. The negative setback into the bluff is also recognized. ~
Proposed/ ~
HOUSE Existing Required Variance (
Front, north 1' , 3,0' 27; ·
-.., Side, east 5.5 6 .5 ~
~ Side, west 9' . 10' 1' ~
lakeside(deck) 48.5' 50' 1.5' ~ /
3.54 -4453-
Proposed/
Existing
SHED
side, east 0' +/-
lakeside 38' +/-
LOT AREA 8,027
Required Variance
4' 4'
50' 12'
10,000 1,973
JULY 25, 1995
The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 350:420,
Subdivision 8 of the Zoning Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the
use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and
restrictions of Section 350:420.
It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the
authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to afford
the owners reasonable use of their land:
Construction of a 6.5' x 9.5' two story entry addition and a 10' x
33' lower level deck on the lakeside of the dwelling.
4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property:
Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands, PID #23-117-24 43 0031.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in
Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used..
6. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin
County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject
construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City
Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jensen and seconded by
Councilmember Polston.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Ahrens, Hanus, Jensen, Polston. Jessen was-absent and excused.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
None
Ma~'~ ......
-4454-
155
This information sheet only summarize~ a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning
Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at z~72-0600.
General Zoning Information Sheet
Zoning District- Single Family Residential
PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS - Lot Area. Lot Width, and Setback ReOuirement.-~:
Minimum Lot Area (measured above the flood elevation) ...................... 10,000 square feet
Minimum Lot Width* ......................................................................................... 60 feet
Front Yard Setback ........................................................................................... 30 feet
Side Yard Setback ............................................................................................. 10 feet
Rear Yard Setback ............................................................................................ 15 feet
Minimum Lot Depth ........................................................................................... 80 feet
Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback ............................................................ 50 feet
Minimum Floor Area Requirement: ...................... , .................................. 840 square feet
*Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 60 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac
shall be 60 feet at the front building setback line.
Building Height: Maximum 21/2 stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height. Building Height is defined as "the
vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a flat
roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof,
to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a
pitched or hip roof."
LOTS OF RECORD, S_oecial Provisions:
Corner Lots:
lot width minimum side yard setback
40 - 50 feet 10 feet
51 - 80 feet 20 feet
81 feet or more 30 feet
~ide Yard Requirements: The required side yard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet.
lot width minimum setback on 1 side yard
40 - 79 feet 6 feet
80 - 100 feet 8 feet
101 feet or more 10 feet
Front Yard: Except as regulated in Section 350:440, Subd. 6 of the City Code, the front yard
setback shall be based on the lot depth as follows:
lot depth minimum front yard setback
60 feet or less 20 feet
61 - 80 feet 24 feet
81 feet or more 30 feet
Rev..~/97 - 4455-
Ordinance. For further"]~fo~r~ation, contact the City of
..~0. ,"5
'....*.., t-:5)
-4456-
EXIST. LOT AREA:
so FT
145 University Avenue ~Vest, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
Phone: (651) 281-1200 ' (800) 925-1122
TDD (651) 281-1290
LMC Fax: (651) 281-1299 ' LMCIT Fax: (651) 281'-1298
Web Site: http://www.lmnc.or¢
Land Use Decisions Checklist
Variance -Approval to depart from the standards contained in city's zoning
ordinance
1. Does strict enforcement of the ordinance cause undue
hardship?
2. Are the circumstances unique to this particular piece of
property?
3. Was the hardship created by the landowner?
4. If granted, will the variance alter the essential character of the
area?
4. Is the landowner asking to use the property in way that is
different from what is allowed in the area? "Use variances"
are not allowed under the Municipal Planning Act except for
temporary use of a one family unit by two families.
-4457-
Nov-13-03 1Z:37 From-Kennedy & Graven +$123379310 T-80T P.002/008 F-908
470 Pillsbury Cea{er
200 South 5ix~ 5¢~{
Minaeapo{is MN ~)402
(412)))7-~00 Mephone
(6lC) 5~7-9910 ~
h~d l~.~nned~vemcom
ROBERT J. Lh~KI)ALL
At'tomey az Law
D[t~eet Dial (612)337-92 I9
P,~al Prop~r~ ~w
C~fi~d by M(~som Sm~ Bar
November 13, 2003
VIA FACSIMIT,"~
952..472-0620
AND U.S. IV~ll~
Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re~_m'anem of County Road 15 Proposed Exchm~ge A?eement Between the City of
Mound and Xcel Energy
DearKandis:
We have not yet been able to reach agreement ~ith Xcel Energy concerning the proposed exchange
of land between the City and Xcel Energy under which the City would convey ehe City-owned
parcel iramediately east of the Xcel substation to Xcel for the Xcel-owned parcel immediately wes~
of ~he Xcel substation. As you [,mqw, tI~e City needs ro acquire ~e property west of [he substation
to facilitate the realignmem of Coung, Road 15 and construct a storm water pond. Based on
disc~zssion with Carlton Moore .and Job~ Cazneron, we concluded that we should proceed w/th
proposed City Cmmcil adoption of an eminent domain resolution to enable filing ofeminem domain
proceedin~ to acquire the property owned by Xcel at t. he earlies~ possible oppommity.
Enclosed is a proposed form of eminent domain resolufior~ It calls for the Ciw to convey the parcel
owned by the City east of tl~ substation to Xcel in mitigation of damages caused by the miring.
Xcel may object ~o the mitigation and, if they do object, they may succeed in defeating The
mitigation. However, I wmdd hope that they will not choose m oppose the mitigation. I still am
hope.~al we will reach a~eement but at least we can get the clock running on condemnation in order
that we can obtain the property in time to prevent delaying the real~?ment of County Road 15.
Po'L-24026~v 1
MU200.92
-4458-
Nov-13'03 12:31~ From-Kennect¥ & Graven
Kandis Hanson Ltr
November 13, 2003
Page 2
+6123379310 T-807 P.003/008
F-g08
,Lf you have any questions about this, please call me. I/you'd like me zo auend the Council meeting
at which it is to be considered, please let me know that.
~ ~Very U'Ldy yo~
P, JL:peb
Enclosure
cc: Carlton Moore
John Cameron
lohn Dean
P, JL. ZaO2~av I
M U200-~.r'2
-4459-
12:38 From-Kennedy & Graven +61233Tg310 T-807 P.004/008 F-gO$
RESOLUTION NO.
AUTHORIZING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
TO ACQUIKE CERTAIN REAL ESTATE
FOR REALIGNMENT OF COUNTY ROAD 15
AND OTI-I~P,. PUBLIC PURPOSES
W¥IEKEAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the official governing body of the
City of Mound; and
WI-IEREAS, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, acting by and through
its City Council, is authorized by law to acquire land needed for public use or purpose; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to facilitate construction of zealigned Hennepin County Road
15 by the County beginning in 2004 and to construct storm water retention ponds in order to more
effectively meet the needs of the public and the City of Mound ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, the plans and designs for the Project require that the real estate described in
Exhibit A attached hereto ("Subject Property'~ be acquired to implement the plans and desi~s for
the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City and Hennepin County have previously entered into a Cooperative
Agreement for Pdght of Way Acquisition for the Project under which the City agreed to acquire tlae
Subject Property for the Project; and
WI*IEREAS, the City Council finds that it is reasonably necessary, proper, and convenient,
and in the interest of the public health, convenience, and general welfare of the citizens of the City
that title to and possession of the Subject Property be acquired for the furtherance of the Project; and
Vvq-IEREAS, the City Council ~tncls that the funding and construction schedule for the
Project makes it necessary to acquire title to and possession of the Subject Property prior to fl~e
RJL-240265v I
M U200-92
-4460-
No¥-l~-O~ 12:g8 From-Kennedy & ~raven +~1~337g~10 T-807 P. OOS/O08 F-g08
filing of the final report ofT_he condemnation commissioners to be appointed by the district court;
and
WIqEREAS, the City Engineer and City Attorney have identified other real estate which is
legally described in .Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Mitigative ParceI") which
the City can convey to the owner of the Subject Prope~T in mitigation of the damages caused by the
taking of the Subject Property; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OY THE CITY OF
MOUND IN REGULAR MEETING ASSElvJ[BLED, that it is the considered judgment of the
COuncil that the Subject Property be acquired for the ~ted public purposes and, if' necessary,
through the exercise of the power of eminent domain and tlmt the City commit to convey to the
owner of the Subject Property fee simple ownership of the Mitigative Parcel in mitigation of the
damages caused by the taking of the Subject Property;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager and the City Attorney are authorized
and directed to take all steps necessary to: (a) acquire the Subject Property, in fee simple (together
with described easements), by filing an action in eminent domain, negotiation of early entry
authorization, and the use of the quick-take procedure; and (b) convey ~he Mitigative Parcel to the
owner of the Subject Property in mitigation of the damages caused by :he taking of flae Subject
Property.
BE IT FURTHER R~SOLVED, that the City M~n~ger is authorized to determine the
amount of the City's approved appraisal of value pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 117.042, the quick-take
RJL-24026~vl 2
MU20(J-92
-4461 -
Nov-13-O$ 12:38 From-Kennedy & Graven +81Z33?g310 T-80? P.008/003 F-gO8
Passed and adopted flxis ~
day of November, 2003.
ATTEST:
Pat Meisel, Mayor
City Cl~k
R3L-240265vl
M U200-92
-4462-
Nov-13-03 12:38 From-Kennedy & Graven +6123379310 T-807 P.OOT/O08 F-g08
RESOLUTION NO.
The a~taehed resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound on November
2003.
The question was on the adoption of the resolution, and there were__ YEAS and
follows:
CITY OF MOUND COUNCILMEMBERS: YEA NAY
Pat Meisel, Mayor
David Osmek
Bob Brown
Mark Hanus
Peter Meyer
NAYS
OTHEK
RESOLUTION ADOPTED.
ATI'EST:
City Clerk
KIL-240265vl
MU200-92
-4463-
Nov-13-03 12:38 From-Kennedy & Graven +6125379310 T-807 P.008/008 F-908
Lot 32 and the East 17.4 feet of Lot 33, Koehler's Addition to Mound
Together with a permanent easement ~'or drainage purposes over all that part of Lot .31,
KOEHLERS ADDITION TO MOUND, according to flae duly recorded plat, which lies
westerly and southerly of the following described line:
Commencing ~t the southwest comer of said Lot 31; flaence nm easterly
along the south l~ae of said Lot 31 on an assumed bearing of North 87
degrees 51 minutes 34 seconds East for 8.37 feet To the actual point of
begimaing of the line being described; thence North 3 degrees 37 minutes 07
seconds West for 13.41 feet; thence South 86 degrees 22 minutes 53 seconds
West for 6.79 feet more or less to the west line of said Lot 31 and said line
there terminating.
Together with a temporary construction easement over the westerly 8.00 feet of said Lot 31.
Said temporary construction easement shall expire December 31, 2006.
Ac¢ordhag to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Coumy
Recorder in and for Hermepha County, Minnesota
PJL.2,~]26Svl
MU200~_
-4464-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 03-108
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON 2004 STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted November 10, 2003, a
report has been prepared by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. with reference to
the improvement of streets as shown in Exhibit A, and this report was received by the
Council on November 25, 2003, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost-effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota:
The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the
report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of
the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated
total cost of the improvement of $2,113,100.
A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 9th day of
December, 2003, in the council chambers of city hall at 7:30 p.m. and the City
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as
required by law.
Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of November, 2003.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Acting Mayor Mark Hanus
-4465-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
7:00 PM, Wednesday, November 1;',
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster
· Discussion of December Board Meeting Schedule
· 11/21/03 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee Meeting, 11/21/03 (~ 8:00 a.m.
in the LMCD Office
READING OF MINUTES- 10/22/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
PUBLIC HEARING
Bayview Event Center, new multiple dock license and special density license application
to increase the length of transient Boat Storage Units (BSU's) 1-11 from 20' to 31'.
1. Public Hearing (Continued from 10/22/03 Regular Board Meeting)
2. Discussion and/or Consideration.
1. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
A) Review of 2003 EWM Final Season Report;
B) Review of 2003 Zebra Mussel Inspection Program Report (handout);
C) Additional Business;
2. ADMINISTRATION
A) Appointments for 2004:
Auditor Selection
- Legal Counsel
· Prosecuting Attorney
· Bookkeeper
· Official Newspaper
· Bank Depository Resolution for fiscal year 2004
B) Meeting Report from the 10/8/03 Board Planning/Workshop Session (handout);
C) Chair update of 11/6/03 annual meeting with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office
Water Patrol;
D) Consideration of staff recommendation for compensation adjustment for
permanent part-time Administrative Secretary, Karen Anderson (handout);
-4466-
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
E)
Review of spreadsheet that summarizes apPliCation fees for LMCD Resolutions
95, 96, and 98;
F) Additional Business;
FINANCIAL
A) Audit of vouchers (11/1/03 - 11/15/03)
B) Additional Business;
SAVE THE LAKE
WATER STRUCTURES
LAKE USE & RECREATION
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
· Canning vadance application withdrawn in 2000
10. ADJOURNMENT
-4467-
DRAFT
LAKE MINNE~ONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
7:00 PM, Wednesday, October 22, 2003
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMillan, Orono; Tom
Skramstad, Shorewood; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Paul Knudsen, Minnetdsta; Pete Nelson, Victoria;
Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka BeaCh; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Jose Valdesuso, EXcelsior; Katy Van Hemke,
Minnetonka. Also present: Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician.
Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound.
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster
Foster stated that he had two announcements for the Board. First, the annual meeting with the Hennepin
C0"d~ Shedffs Office Water PatrOl is scheduled for Thursday, 1116103, at 8:00 a.m. at the. Water Patrol
Headquarters in Spring Park. He encouraged all Board members to attend this meeting. SecOnd, he
sated !~.,at he had discussed the November Regu ar Board Meet ng schedu e w th Nybeck Based on th s
d scuss"~, he recommended that a Regular Board Meeting be scheduled for 11/12/03 and that the Regular
Board ~.ting scheduled for 11/26/03 :be cance ted due to the Thanksgiving holiday. No Board
Plannin~orkshoP' Session would be scheduled n November; however, one cou d be scheduled in
December. If the Board did not object to thiS recommendation, he stated that he would direct staff to
proceed accordingly. There were no objections.
READING oF MINUTES. 9/24/03 LMCD Regular BOard Meeting
MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Canning seconded to approve the minutes from the 9/24/03 Regular Board
Meeting aS submitted.
VOTE: Motion cartied unanimously.
PUBLIC: COMMENTS. Persons in: attendanbe, subjects not on the agenda.
Mr. Dick Osgood, Executive Director for the Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA), stated that he was
attendance, to read a statement, dated 10/22/03', tO t~e'Distri~t On. beh~!f of the LM~ The statement read:
The diScOvery of zebra mussels in the Brainerd Lakes Area is a.:call to action. This discovery is a
vivid reminder that few Minnesota lakes are immune from a zebra mussel introduction Lake
Minnetonka must be cOnsidered e§Pecially vulnerable.
The LMA believes access inspections are an essential element of any reasonable and responsible
program to protect Lake Minnetonka. Fortunately, the LMCD and LMA are prepared. By co-
sponsoring the pilot access inspection program in 2002 and 2003, we know that trained inspectors
-4468-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October 22, 2003
Page 2
can provide valuable educational messages and credible inspections. Now, its time to expand this
program to provide comprehensive coverage on Lake Uinnetonka.
The LMA believes the administi-atioh and operation of a comprehensive access inspection program
is the job of the LMCD. We appreciate such a program, which could easily cost $100,000 per year,
requires advanced preparation as well as significant funding, which is not now at hand. But, in this
case, we feel the threat justifies the effort. A zebra mussel introduction in Lake Minnetonka would
be disastrous. Once in our lake, there is no way to eradicate zebra mussels.
The time has come to get the cities around the lake involved.
Please let us know how we can help the LMCD take immediate action to ramp up the access
inspection program to protect Lake Minnetonka from zebra mussel and dozens of other exotic
species that are headed our way.
Respectfully,
LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATION
Canning stated that the statement Osgood read indicated that the LMA believes that the administration and
operation of a comprehensive inspection program is the job of the LMCD. He asked Osgood what other
parties could be involved in such a program.
Osgood stated that other possible partners could include the LMA, the member cities, counties, and the MN
DNR.
Pete NelSon stated that any other access into Lake Minnetonka should include other lakes or tributaries
near Lake Minnetonka that flow into Lake Minnetonka, citing Lake Virginia as an example.
Seuntjens asked for clarification on the efforts being done by the MN DNR around the state to prevent the
spread of zebra mussels and other exotic species.
Osgood stated that the MN DNR has a watercraft inSpection program for a mandated 20,000 inspection
hours each season on both infested and non-infested waters, but primarily infested waters, on a statewide
basis. In general, the primary focus of the MN DNR is to prevent the spread of exotics species from
infested to non-infested waters. The pilot programs conducted in 2002'and 2003 included supplementing
the existing MN DNR inspection program on Lake Minnetonka to inspect watercraft.that are entering the
lake.
Foster s'tated that thb 'tv1N DNR had' PcevioUSlyl ndicated to.him that the.probability of introducing zebra
musselS'into Lake Midhetonka wa~ relatiVelY IOW and that they did not have the funds to implement an
inspection program around the state,that wo.uJd inspec, t boats before, they enter non.infested waters.
Osgood thanked the Board for consideration of this' request, adding that the LMA would like to have the
Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee reconvened in the near future.
-4469-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October 22, 2003
Page 3
PUBLIC HEARING
· Bayview Event Center, new multiple dock license and special density license applications to increase
the length of transient Boat Storage Units (BSU's) 1-11 from 20' to 31'.
Foster asked for background on this agenda item from Nybeck prior to opening the public hearing.
Nybeck stated that the applicant was addressing the concerns raised by staff relating to the amount of
929,4' shoreline and 100' contour line from the 929.4' shoreline that were not documented on the
proposed survey submitted with the proposed applications, Because this survey work had not been
completed, the applicant has requested to have the public hearing continued to the 11/12J03 Regular
Board Meeting and staff has contacted the abutting property owners indicating this.
Foster opened the public headng at 7:15 p.m. and entertained feedback from the Board on the
proposed applications or a motion to continue the public hearing to the 11/12/03 Regular Board
Meeting.
MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Skramstad seconded to continue the public hearing for the Bayview Event
Center new multiple dock license and special density license applications to the 11/12/03
Regular Board Meeting.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Seuntjens asked for an update on the status of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee
because he believed the outcome of its work could have an impact on the proposed applications.
Foster stated that he envisioned the sub-committee would be re-convened sometime this fall.
The Board discussed the goals and objectives of the sub-committee and the need to re-convene it in
the near future, There was discussion that Foster chaired the firet sub-committee meeting and whether
he had a conflict of interest because of the pending City of Deephaven new multiple dock license and
special density license applications, The consensus of the Board was for Foster to work with Nybeck
on coordinating a second sub-committee meeting in the near future and for the sub-committee to
establish a timeline schedule for additional sub-committee meetings.
1. WATER STRUCTURES
McMillan stated that she would like the Board to discuss the launch ramp information form that was
included in the handout folders.
Nybeck stated that the launch ramp information form was prepared by LeFevere based on the
discussion of the Board members that attended the 10/8/03 Board Planning/workshop Session, He
reminded the Board that there was discussion at that meeting on possible enforcement relating to
unlicensed "off-lake" storage activity occurring at a multiple dock facility on the lake. The consensus of
the Board that attended the 10/8/03 Board Planning/Workshop Session was for LeFevere to prepare an '
information form to accompany the 2004 renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications.
The form in the handout folder has been prepared by LeFevere to get a better idea of what type of
launching ramp and other associated activities are going on around the lake,
-4470-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October 22, 2003
Page4
Seuntjens asked how many multiple dock facilities would be receiving the launch ramp information
form.
Nybeck stated that all multiple dock facilities on Lake Minnet°nka would be receiving a copy of the
launch ramp information form to be completed with their 2004 renewal application.
McMillan questioned whether it would be appropriate to include exotic species related questions on this
information form, especially with the request made by Osgood eadier in the meeting.
Nybeck stated that it might make more Sense to send out a supplemental information form once it has
been established what facilities around the lake have launch ramps. The 2004 renewal, without
change, multiple dock license aPplications are scheduled to be mailed in the next few days and a copy
of the launch ramp information form was included in the handout folders for informational purposes.
Harper stated that launch ramp information received from multiple dock facilities around the lake would
be documented in the database maintained for these facilities in the District office.
Canning stated that the launch ramp information form waS prepared by LeFevere to get the information
he was looking for to verify whether there was "off-lake" storage activity occurring at multiple dock
facilities around the lake in conjunction with a launch ramp.
The consensus of the Board was for staff to send out the launch ramp information with the 2004
renewal, without change, multip!e dock license and to have further Board discussi~on relating to. exotic
species once it has been established what multiple dock facilities around the lakehave pdvate launch
ramps. '
2, ADMINISTRATION
A. Appointment of nominating committee for 2004 LMCD Board Officers.
FOster s~ated that this agenda item was discussed at the 1018103 Board planning/Workshop
SeSsion~ adding that it Was.the consensus that any Board member interested in serving on the
nominating wou d be welcomed. He asked for volUnt~m to serve on the nominating committee for
2004 LMCD Bbard'O~ers. BPard members BabCOb~i KnudSen, McM[i'ian., peie Ne son,
Seuntjens, and Valdesus~(a~ a substitute) ag'rbed to serve on thb nominating, with Seuntjens
indicating that he would agree to Chair the nominating committee. .
Pete Nelson asked for clarification on when the nominating committee would make
recOm~'e~fi~o~;S'to tfi~ ~ii~ ~ard for~200~ LM:CD BOa~ ~%rs.
Nybeck stated that the recommendations would be made either at the second Board meeting in
Janu~'~r~' t~b fi, i~!~Board meet ~gid .~ebrUarY. · .
Pete Nexison a~ked if t~:~e are any' ~ritten pfocedures iOr ihe-:nominating committee to. follow.
Fostel~'~[ated that there'are not written procedUr;s.for the'nominating committee to follow;
hoWe v~r ;the nomin: atir~{~; Co,mitt%*.: i'h {h'b pa~i 'ha~ rec°m~ended a slate of Officers .for the entire
Board to consider: .'This does nc)[ prohibit other BOard ,members from eXpressing theirinterest in an
Officer position if theY are not ihCluded in the slate recommended by the nominating committee, in
-4471 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regutar Board Meetin9
October 22, 2003
page 5
which case an election would occur for that Board Officer position. Without objections, he stated
that he would appoint Board members Babcock, Knudsen, McMillan, Pete NelsOn, Seuntjens, and
Valdesuso (as a substitute) on the nominating committee for 2004 LMCD Board Officers, with
Seuntjens as the Chair, There were no objections.
B. Review of draft letter to be forwarded to LMCD Member Cities regarding Board appointments for
2004.
Foster stated that there was.a draft letter for 2004 Board appointments and Board attendance
sheet for the past year to be forwarded in the next few days to the 14 member cities. Without
objection~ he stated that he would direct staff to forward it to the 14 member cities as drafted.
There were no objections.
C, Review of Resolutions 95, 96, and 98 that establish fees for LMCD applications.
Foster stated that staff included in the packet the three fee resolutions that summarize fees for
LMCD applications. He asked if there were questions or comments from the Board on these
resolutions.
Canning stated that he had a fundamental issue about how the District conducts its regulatory
authority and how it is supported financially, both from the District budget and the fees charged to
the public. He believed that there is a need to charge fees :to the. public; however, he believed that
the fees are currently excessively high and that they discourage the public from making application,
citing vadance and residential multiple dock license applications as two exampleS. A lOWer fee
structure, especially at residential sites'compared to'commerCial sites, m:i§ht encourage the public
to. get the proper appreval from the Board when necessary. He concluded bY stating that the 14
member cities pay an annual levy to the District and that this should be factored into fees
established by the District for applications, especially for residential sites.
McMillan stated that she believed the fees charged by the District for variance applications are
relatively consistent with the majority of the member cities. These citieS'might nOt have a
refundable deposit for the preparations of Findings; however, one distinct difference is that the
Distdct attorney prepares the Findings while a number of cities have the Findings prepared by their
staff. If the District was to change the fee for a variance application to a fiat fee, the Board should
consider the time spent by the District attorney on the preparation of Findings,
Canning questioned whether .the :payment for the~preparation of the Findings by the District
afforney should be taken from the annual District;~dminiStratiVe Budgbt o~ if It Should be Charged
back to the public on a case by case basis-.: TheOi~ of Greenwood requireS, deVelopers to sign an
agreement in which they agree to pay for attorney fees. However, he did not believe this concept
was :appropriate to have the public pay a Iiumber of fees charged by the DiStrict, e~pbcialiy at
res dential sites; because the cause of the problem is the Cod'e: '
Foster stated that one concern he had was that the public pays a fee for an application required by
the Distdct that is open ended, Because of this~ it might make moresense to have a flat fee for
some of the applications required by the District.
Suerth arrived at 8:00 p,m.
-4472-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October 22, 2003
Page6
Seuntjens agreed with the comments of Canning that the District should not be charging the public
excessive fees. However, he expressed concern about passing' fees for the processing of variance
applications on to the member cities because he believed it was common to charge these
expenses back to the indiVidual that benefits from the action of the District. This should probably
be done on a fiat fee basis based on the average cost to process all variance applications.
Craig Nelson stated that he understood the $250 deposit for a variance application could be
problematic. However, he believed that it was the responsibility of the taxpayer that Would benefit
from a variance from Code to pay for the expenses rather than passing these expenses on the
taxpayers in general. He believed that the general taxpayer needs to pay for the operation of the
District and there is a need for a fair and equitable fee associated with a vadance application.
There is a significant financial benefit associated with a variance granted by the District because
the placement of a dock and storage of a boat(s) is a privilege, not a dght, because the public owns
the surface water.
Pete Nelson stated that it might make sense to establish fiat fees where one situation fits all. For
variance applications that benefit a specific resident(s), he believed that they should be willing to
incur the costs associated with the application and not passed on to the general taxpayer.
Seuntjens stated that he concurred that fees associated with vadance applications need to be fair
and equitable, and they are the responsibility of the resident(s) that benefit from it.,
McMillan e~pres..sed concern about the lowering of application fees for a mUltiple dock license too
Iow at residential sites for a combined dock at two or more sites that have limited amounts of
shOreline. An undesired outcome of the District could be moreboats stored at a conlbined dock
rather than if boats are stored at these sites at seParate docks.
Van Hercke stated that she did not recall a large number of requests from residents around the
lake tQ combine docking at two or.mom sites at a common dock. She agreed that there 'is a benefit
to have combined docking situations around the lake; however, she understood that docking and
storage of watercraft on the lake is a privilege and that the fees incurred shoUld be the
responsibility of those that. benefit from it.
Harper stated:that there am afew multiple dock facilities around the lakethat have a ccombined
dock approved for two or more sites. In fact, a few of these facilities have a variance approved
from'Code, He ~indicated': thatthe renewal :fees for thesetypes Of multiple do~ks iS relatively Iow,
approximateJY $125 for six BSUIs, butthere is' a targer fee associated for the initial application or
any.futumapplications to make. SignifiCant:~hanges.
Knudsen stated.that if the annual renewal fee for a multiple dock' license for. a cor~bined dock was
approximately $125, he believed that was fair and equitable taking into conSiderati0ti savings of
installing two separate docks.
Canning questioned whether the annual fee for a multiple dock license at a cOmbined residential
dock was necessary.
-4473-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
OctOber 22, 2003
Page7
Foster stated that he believed an annual fee is necessary for combined residential multiple dock
sites to allow staff to inSpect these Sites to ensure that dock installation and boat storage is
consistent with the approved site plan. He believed that there was some interest in the reductions
of fees associated with variance applications and combined multiple dock si~ations at residential
situations.
Seuntjens stated that he would like to assemble a list of concerns that Canning or other Board
members had relating to license fees so that they could be addressed at this or other Board
meetings in the future.
The Board further discussed this and the consensus was to direct staff to prepare a spreadsheet
that summarized the fees associated with LMCD applications. The Board discussed that any
changes to fees associated with LMCD applications Should become effective in 2005 because a
budget has already been approved for 2004. In addition to the spreadsheet, the Board directed
staff to provide an analysis of revenue received the past few years for variance applications and
multiple dock applications for combined docks at residential situations. This information was to be
brought back for initial review at the 11/12/03 Regular Board Meeting, with Possible further review
at an upcoming Board Planning/VVorkshop Session.
D. Review of draft Executive Director Position DescriPtion.
Foster asked for backgrOUnd On this agenda item from Skramstad.
Skramstad stated that the Personnel Committee had worked up a position description for.the
ExeCUtive Director position that included a position purpose; position responsibilities;'and
knowledge, skills, and abilities. He recommended that the Board approve the position description
so that these cdteria could be used in the upcoming performance review for Nybeck.
MOTION: Van Hercke moved, McMilian seconded to approve the Executive Director position
pescription, subject to replacing the WOrds "Executive DirectOr" in the third line under
POSITION PURPOSE and replacing it with the word "Chair".
Canning stated that he believed one area :that COUld reduce the time constraints on Nybeck was
the' Board mihutes, He commended the CUrrent BOard minutes;hoWeVer, he was supportive of
su:mmary minutes. ~
A number of Board members stated that they were supportive of more detailed Board..m.nutes as
theyarecurrentlY prepared.
VOTE:' Motion ca,ed unanim0asiy
The Board discussed the performance review process for the upcoming review of Nybeck. There
was discussion of the advantages of a self-appraisal system and the' heed for FOster tb';'C%rdinate
the collective appraisal on behalf of the entire Board. Skramstad stated that he had agreed to work
with Foster on the creation of a performance appraisal document to send'OUtt8 ail Board members
to establish a collective performance review on behalf of the Board, under the leadership of Foster.
The consensus of the Board was for Foster to collect the comm8nts from the Board on the
-4474-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October 22, 2003
Page 8
performance of Nybeck, to prepare a collective performance .review on behalf of the Board, and to
discuss it at an upcoming Regular Board Meeting prior to reviewing it with Nybeck.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
E. Review of proposed payscales for Executive Director, Administrative Technician, and Administrative
Secretary positions.
Foster asked for background on this agenda item from Skramstad.
Skramstad stated that he had worked with Nybeck on the preparation of payscales and salary
Ranges for the Executive Director, Administrative Technician, and Administrative Secretary
positions for the District. He repoded that all three positions are within the recommended ranges,
noting that they were established using the Stanton Survey and CPI adjusted pay for these
positions in the past.
Canning stated that this document was reviewed at the 10/8/03 Board Planning/Workshop Session
and was well founded.
Craig Nelson stated that although there are advantages to payscales, they sometimes could limit
the Board on the hiring of employees on both the Iow and high end of the payscale for that
position. He indicated that he preferred flexibility in. payscales that would allow the Board to meet
comparable rates for other similar positions.
The Board took no action on this agenda item because.they believed that proposed~payscales for
these positions were. guidelines rather than policy for the District,
F. DiscussiOn of draft LMCD Data Practices Policy.
FOster asked for background on this agenda item from staff.
Nybeck stated that the first draft of this policy was reviewed this past spring, adding that the
changes recommended, by the Board have been incorporated, Two documents included, in the
packet are a draft policy for LMCD.Data Practices and a Resolution appointing the Executive
Director as the Responsible Authority for the purposes of the Minnesota Govemment,:Data
Practices Act.
MOTioN: skramstad moved, Craig Nelson seconded to approve the draft LMCD Data Practices
Policy as submitted and to adopt the resolution that appoints the Executive Director
position as the responsible party for the District for the,~purposes of the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act.
VOTE: Motio~ can'ed unanimously
G. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
-4475-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October ZZ, ZOO3
Page 10
buoy system on Lake Minnetonka and whether changes should be considered in the future. The
consensus of the Board was to have Hennepin County finalize a comprehensive analysis of the buoy
system on Lake Minnetonka, prepare a Report that summarizes this analysis, and have a
representative attend either a Regular Board Meeting or Board Planning/Workshop Session in the near
future to review this,
8. OLD BUSINESS
Update of Howards Point Marina
Skramstad stated that he had recently been in contact with a representative of Howards Point Madna
regarding the unauthorized "off-lake" storage taking place at the facility. Skramstad had asked whether
they would be willing to reduce the number proposed this past summer in the application that was
denied. Howards Point Marina has communicated back to him that they would agree the number of 35
"off-lake" storage units and that it was not negotiable. Skramstad stated that he communicated to the
representative of Howards Point Marina that he would bring this number back to the Board.
Update of Fundinq for 2004 Water Patrol Proiect
Skramstad stated that he had recently been in contact with Hennepin County Commissioner Linda
Koblick regarding the county funding this project in 2004. She communicated that there are a series of
scheduled public hearings associsted with the 2004 Sheriff's Department budget and a schedule has
been forwarded to Nybeck for those Board members interested in attending an upcoming meeting.
The next public hearing is scheduled in the afternoon of 10/29/03.
Update of Six Mile Creek
Skramstad asked Knudsen if there had been any new discussions relating to Six Mile Creek and
Upland Farms.
Knudsen stated that he was unaware of any new discussions at the City of Minnetrista; however, there
is a developer adjacent to the Upland Farms site that is advertising access to Lake Minnetonka in the
local newspaper via Six Mile Creek.
Update of possible fundinq of EWM Harvestinq Program by the Mcwr}
Foster updated the Board regarding a recent conversation he had with the MCWD Chair and Executive
Director for funding of the EWM Harvesting Program. He believed that they are possibly interested in
this, that there would be continued conversations, and that he would keep the Board informed on any
future conversations.
9. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION. Performance Evaluation of the Executive Director (Note: Board may vote to
conduct
evaluation in closed session).
An Executive Session to discuss the performance evaluation of the Executive Director did not take
place at this Board meeting.
-4476-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October 22, 2003
¸!
~age9
FINANCIAL
A, Audit of vouchers (10/1/03 - 10/t5/03) and (10/16/03 - 1013_1/03).
Skramstad reviewed the aa[tit of vouchers as subrniited.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Canning seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. September financial'summary and balance sheet.
Skramstad reviewed the September financial' summary and balance sheet as submittedl
MOTION:. Canning moved, Van HerCke seconded to accept the September financial summary and
balance sheet as submitted..
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously
C. Additional Business.
There was no additional business,
4. -LAKE USE & RECREATION
There was no discussion.
5. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
There was no discussion.
6. SAVE THE LAKE
McMillan stated that a "Save the Lake" AdViSOry Cornrriittee was planned for w~n'esday, i0/29/03, at
11:30 a,m. in the District office. She'enmuraged Board members to attend the m¢~ting if h~Y Were
interested. "-
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Nybeck stated that lake level as of 10/7/03 was 928.15', noting that the dam was closed. There are a
number of informational items included in the packet and handout foldei'sf6i' inf°rmational pu~0Ses.
This included newspaper articles from the Lakeshore Weekly News and Minneapoli? Star Tribune, the
most recent quarterly Executive Director Newslette-i~, u¢'d~ited' B6ai-d R6Ste¢~:i:~;!:~i-~:~:eet (~i :'"'
summarized car/trailer inventory on Lake Minnetonka in 2003, and a letter from Jim Zimme~a~''
discussing payment of a "Minimum-Wake" buoy on the east-side of Caimans Bay near tll~e'N'a~bws
Channel.
The Board discussed the Zimmerman "Minimum-Wake" buoy and buoys in general oh Lake '"
Minnetonka. A number of Board members recalled that Hennepin County was looking intothe overall
-4477-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
October 22, 2003
11. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:41 p.m.
Page 11
Albert O. Foster, Chair
Lili McMillan, Secretary
-4478-
A quaKcerly pubUcation of Hennepin County
FalL 2003 · Volume 3, Number 4
Hennepin
studies HCMC
governance
The County Board is weighing options for
the future governance of Hennepin County
Medical Center, the county's largest
operation and the only publicly owned
hospital in the Twin Cities area.
A governance task force has recormmended
that a new, not-for-profit corporation be
created to operate HCMC to give it the
flexibility needed to sttrvive in the
competitive health-care market.
Hennepin officials said a decision on
HCMC would be made no later than mid-
November to leave enough time to draft
any necessary legislation before the next
session of the Minnesota Legislature.
The medical center has been recognized as
one of America's best hospitals by U.S.
News & World Report for the sixth
straight year.
CommL~.oner Lindg I(obllck
Proposed budget outUnes
service, staff reductions
The Hennepin County Board
is considering a proposed
2004 county budget of $1.64
billion, a decrease of 3.5
percent from this year's
budget. The proposed net
property zax levy for 2004 is
$495.6 million, an increase of
2.1 percent flora 2003.
Members of the boarxl were
briefed about ~pecltlc budget
recommendatlo~ by lines of
bu~in~ during informal
hearings in October.
"The lnss o£stare and ~edera~
fonding means Hennepin
County mu~ make dra~c
cuu o£ appro:dmately $100
million by the end o£ next
year,' said County Adminis:rator
Sandr~ L. Yargas. "Simply put, we
must eliminate ptogra~s, vendor
contracts and staff.. We have tried
to allocate cuts to business l[ne~
and departments in a bahnced and
~ w..ty~ but tome ~rea.~ are affected
toore directly by state redu~or~."
]~pecia]ly hard Et by stare reductiom are the
county'~ Health, Human Services and Criminal
Justice business lines.
"~ese were amon§ the most
challenging areas in developing the 2004
budget,~ Vargas said. 'However, al! Hennepin
County serdce~ - both internal and ex:ernal -
are feeling the pain."
The county is in the process of fi~izing where
positions will be ellminared. Approximately 100
employees received notification in October that
they toay be laid off. Another ].75 employees
may be affected d~ough reassignments, reduced
hou:s and other measures.
Comm;~e~olxer$ ~ Ste~eill ~*~d ~ Dor~arl
continues pa~e 2
Commi~iofler peter M~[~ghl;.
-4479-
Ill
County
Board
Highlights
In recent weeks,
the County Board:
· Approved an agreement with
the Minneapolis PoLice
Department for county
Sheriff's Office penonnel
and police to jointly enforce
laws .pertaining to illicit drug
acnwty.
· Received a report from the
Community Health
Department on adolescent
mental health, including
information about a new
program that will address
bullying in the schools.
· Approved an agreement with
the University of Minnesota
for preparation of an in-
depth examination of urban
corridor development in the
Twin Cities.
· Accepted a grant from the
Minnesota Department of
Economic Security-
RehabiLitation Services
Branch m continue helping
people with serious and
Hennepin'$ vehicte fleet goes 'green'
Henncpin County has made the
switch from diesel fuel to a biodiesel
blend in its fleet of 175 diesel-
engine vehicles, including snow
plows, road pavers, ambulances and
the county's mobile forensic crime
lab.
"We are pleased to announce the
use of biodiesd in our entire diesel
fleet,~ County Board Chair Mike
Opar said. ~We plan to use 368,000
gallons of 5-percent biodiesel
blended fuel during the next year
after making the switch in Seprem-
Biodiesel is a denner-burning fuel
made from domestically produced,
renewable resources, such as
soybean oil and recycled cooking
oil. It can be used in existing diesel
vehicles, without engine modifica-
Although biodiesel costs slightly
more than petroleum diesel fuel, it
results in better performance,
according to Hennepin County
Transportation Department offi-
cials, who piloted the use of
biodiesel during the past two years.
Research also shows that the use of
biodiesel reduces air pollution.
Taking putt in a~ event to a~nounce Hertnepln'$ use nfbiodle~el fuel were
~pres.en.tadve~ oforganizadom that rapport the cotmty's efforts to reduce
att emmsmns. Pictured (1. to r.) were Ron Jacobson, president nfthe
Minnesota Soybean C~owers A~ociatlon; Cotmty Commi~ioner Peter
McLaughr.m, C..hri, Bame, president o£Zubricatlon Tedmologles~ County
Board Chair Mike Opat~ :md Thn Gerlach, director of outdoor air
programs, American Ltmg Association of Minnesota.
Hennepin has contracted with
Lubrication Technologies, Inc.,
Golden Valley, to provide biodiesel
fuel through the county's coopera-
tive purchasing program. The cities
of MinneapoLis and Brooklyn Park
and Washington County also buy
biodiesel under this contract.
~Using biodiesel is one of the wayx
Hennepin County is leading by
Budget continued from page 1
persistent mental illness who
wish to work. Vargas said Hermepin must private, and through innovation,"
~p~roved an agreement with restructure government services she said.
Examples include the African
American Men Project, the
American Indian Family Project,
partnering with a broad variety of
organizations to provide human
services, consolidating several
departments into a new
Human Services Department
and Hennepin's purchase of
the HERC waste-to-energy
plant near downtown
Minneapolis, which will save
taxpayers money.
Before making a final
decision on the 2004 budget
and taxes Dec. 16, the board
is holding a series of public
hearings. (For more
information on
budget hearings, call
348-5433.)
ment of Health and Family
Support ro accept a grant for
"Healthy Start" services at
Pilot City Health Center in
North Minneapolis to
reduce infant deaths.
Approved $9.6 million in
contracts with employment
and training, community
health and social service
agencies.
~ts customers while holding down
property taxes. "We are making
progress towards this end through
our partnerships with the
community, both public and
Corn m ;~sioner Mike Opat
To find out about these and other
County Board actiom, go to the
Hennepin County Web rite-
w'ur~.l~.J,~e*~i~ ~a.~ - under
Public Affair$, cEck on County
Boan4 Action Summa~. .
example to improve the environ-
ment,~ said County Commissioner
Peter McLaughlin.. ~We have made
many other strides to green our fleet.
The changes not only result in an
improved environment, but in a
cleaner, safer working environment
for our employees."
Commissioner Randy Johnson
Hennepin's Troth in Taxadon
hearing is scheduled for 5:30 p,m.
Thursday, Dec. 4, in the
Government Center.
In the news
Humboldt Greenway construction completed
7 .Hennepin County hosted an
informal neighborhood get-
together in mid-Seprember to
celebrate the dompletion of
roadway construction along the
new Humboldt Greenway.
Residents of the Shingle Creek and
Lind Bohanon neighborhoods
joined Commissioner Mike Opat
and Minneapolis City Council
Member Barb Johnson for a brief
program.
The greenway project has
redesigned an eight-block area of
Humboldt Avenue in far North
Minneapolis with new single-
family homes and townhomes, a
75-unk senior apartment building,
a central green, mad improvements
and Shingle Creek enhancements.
The overall aim of the project, part
of the Hennepin Community Works
program, is to build long-term value
and enhance the existing tax base
through investment in parks and
improved infrastructure.
Hennepin County has served as the
project's lead agency and its largest
financial supporter. The greenway
also has received financial support
from the federal government, the
State of Minnesota, the Merropoli-.
tan Council and the City of
Minneapolis.
Neighborhood r~&nts looked
over homing options at the
celebration in September.
Be a "Book Buddy'
Hennepin Cotmty Medical Center records
approximately 50,000 pediatric clinic visits each
year. That's at least 50,000 opportunities to get kids
hooked on reading.
Because early literacy skills are so important,
HCMC Pediatrics developed a literacy program
with the goal of making sure that every one of the
medical center's young patients has a book of his or
her very own.
HCMC and Twins Cities area Barnes & Noble
stores rece.nd_.y_ co-svonsored a one-week 'Buy a
Boo~'Tg~e i'~;~ee~~ok Buddy" eVent
in which books were purchased for donation to the
pediatrics literacy program. In addition, a
percentage of the purchase pride of books bought at
Barnes & Noble stores benefited the program.
HCMC's "Be a Book Buddy" progntm h a great way to
· . ~ shar~ t. lie joy and plea~ee of.reading ~th childrem
~ p~', ~idcon~eb,.,.ioa = the
sto~g ~d ~g.~siom on ~e ~Rc ~ce
~el ~d ~u~ PI~
Hennepln County Board
of Commissioners
* Mik= Opar, lstDisttfft, Chgir
' Mt~kStenglein, 2ndDisrrict
· G~ll Dor~, SrdDirm>t. V. Chair
· P¢ce.r Mc. Laughlin, 4th District
· Randy Johnson. 5th District
· Linda Koblick, 6th District
° Penny Steele, 7th D/ar/ct
$~dra L. V~rgas
County Adnfinla u-atot
Rickm~ I~ Johnson
Deputy Cotmty Admlni~trator
Meetings
The County Boaui or it~ cornmltttes
generally meet every Tuesday at
1:30 p.m. Meeting~ take place on the
24a' Floor oftbe Hermepin County
Broadcasts
The County Board ~nd committee
meetings are bro~[c.~t live on Metro
Cable Network/Channel 6. Each
meeting aiso is broadcest on Channel 6
at 8 p..m. the Friday following a
Webcasts
Meeting, of the County Board and its
committees also ro~y be viewed live via
the Internet at unvw. eo.h~nnepin, mn. ut/
u~pulm'~g, hrml- here you also will find
video archives of p:evious meetings that
may be viewed.
612-348-3081
www. hennepfn, us
Comment Lfne:
612-348-HENN
Lake Street project reaches out to community groups
The local committee advising the
Lake Street reconstruction and
srreetscaping project has met with
a variety of community groups to
discuss the give-and-take idvolved
in setting priorities for the project.
Project staffand the advisory
committee have held more than 25
meetings with groups in the
community, including business and
property owners, since April, and
will continue m hold meetings up to
and during construction in 2005 to
2007. The reconstruction will
involve the four-mile stretch of Lake
Street between Dupont Avenue and
the Mississippi River.
The Hennepin County
Transportation Department, the
lead agency on the project, will
completely rebuild the Lake Street
roadway, curbs and sidewalks. The
project also will add streatscape
features such as trees, lighdng and
signage intended to promote
neighborhood identity and business
development.
Dates of upcoming public meetings
about the Lake Street
reconstruction, as well as
information on all aspects of the
project, are available at
www. lakestreet, info.
-4481
lights
Produced by Hennept. County PubUc Affairs
Conm'budag to tk;. i~ue~
C~roly~/vl~n;,n, Di~ccm~
John Kaud~en, Editor/Writer
N~mcy Lee~, D~igner/Photographcr
LuAnn Sdmmu, Wdt~
Hennepin Highligh~ online: hrtp://www.¢o, hennepin.mn.u~
Jokn. K~,udsen~e~.hennepin. mn.u~ or call 612-348-6883.
'Printed on 100 percent recked {roper with
H
KANDIS HANSON
CITY MANGER
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MN 55364
FIRST CLASS
PRSRT
MPLS., MN
PERMIT
NO. B273
Happenings
'A Day of Resolution'
results in-sentendng
to community service
An African American Men Project initiative
called "Right Turn" mentors young African
American men, with the goal of helping them
stabilize their lives and the lives of their families.
"Right Turn" recently sponsored an innovative
project, =A Day of Resolution,' at Pilot City
Health Center. More than 500 people were.able
to clear their outstanding traffic offenses and The security review committee is to develop
The appointees:
· Beth Bailey-Allen, executive director, North
Hennepin Mediation Program, Brooklyn
Center.
· Former Hennepin C~.unty Commissioner
John Derus, Minneapolis.
· Sam Grabarski, president, Minneapolis
Downtown Council.
· Jean E Holloway, attorney, Faegte and Benson,
Minneapolis.
· John Laux, police chief, City of Bloomington.
· John Stanoch, vice president for Minnesota,
Qwest, Minneapolis.
· Negotiating reduced rates for health club
memberships for county employees.
· En;ouraging fooifl vendors within the
Government Center to offer fresh fruit and
vegetables.
· Posting signs encouraging people to take the
stairs by all escalators and elevators.
· Sponsoring health fairs for employees that
include information on obesity, healthy eating
and physical activity.
· Promoting the use of cotmty walking and
biking paths.
· Conducting employee walks over the lunch
break.
· Publishing healthy recipes on the Intranet.
misdemeanor warrants through senteocing to : : strategies by Dec. l. The committee's · Sponsoring a "Summer Slim Down~ for
· ,~;:,,: :recommendations will be presented to the board, employees.
:,.? ..;~.~ ~i::-~'; .... Offenng pedometers for ~'.~%k out
North Minneapolis streets.
The African American Men Project, sponsored
by Hennepin County, seeks to strengthen the
social and economic conditions of young black
men.
Task force appointed
to examine security
Hennepin County Board Chair Mike Opat has
announced the appointment of a six-member
task force charged with examining security issues
at the Hermepin County Government Center in
downtown Minneapolis.
The Government Center was the site of a fatal
shooting Sept. 29.
County enters fight
against obesity
Hennepin County's obesity rates have risen, from
14 percent in 1998 to 17 percent in 2002· The
estimated health-related costs to a population the
size of Hennepin for obesity is approximately
$464 million a year, mostly due to the treatment
and complications of type 2 diabetes, coronary
heart disease and hypertevaion.
Rising health care costs for county employem have
prompted Hennepin to hire a full-time fitness
expert, offer health incentives to employees and
sponsor a ~Shape Up!" conference. The coumy
has-implemented nnmerou~ strategies, including:
· Allowing emlzloyees to use sick leave to
purchase health club memberships or home
fitness equipment.
can download from the Intranet.
Public and private institutions can play a role
in fighting obesity, according to experts who
spoke at the "Shape Upi Steps to a Healthier
Hennepln' conference-at the Minneapolls
Con~entlon Center in Qctober.
-4482-
PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
November 13, 2003
Present:
Commissioners Susan Taylor, Ron Motyka, Gene Hostetler, Norm
Domholt, Derrick Hentz, John Beise, Council Representative Bob
Brown, Park Superintendent Jim Fackler and Secretary
Denice Widmer
Chair Susan Taylor called the meeting to order at 7:32pm.
Approval of the October 9, 2003 Minutes
Motion by Motyka to approve the October 9, 2003 Minutes. Seconded by
Domholt. Motion carried.
Agenda Changes.
Commissioner Beise requested the addition
Parks.
City Code 700.70, Driving in
3. Comments and suggestions
Interviews: No applicants at this time.
Taylor
Discuss: Hennepin County Tax Forfeited
Fackler gave a brief overview, stating that staff had mmended releasing this
property for sale tning property owners only and must be combined with
existing by Brown to release Hennepin County Tax Forfeited
Property # !234 for sale to adjoining property owners only and
must be >erty.
Review: Code
Beise gave a brief ov¢
Beise recommended the
unenforceable as written.
Ordinance
of the existing code as well as the proposed code.
changes due the current code being
The existing code reads:
705.20 Operations Generally. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or
operate any snowmobile in the following ways:
(a) No snowmobile shall be driven within 100 feet of any fisherman, '
pedestrian, skating rink, or sliding area or in any other area where
the operation would conflict with or endanger other persons or
property.
(b) No snowmobile shall be operated in any cemetery.
(c) No snowmobiles shall be operated on private property of another
without permission of the owner or lawful occupant of said
property.
(d) No snowmobile shall be operated in a manner so as to create a
loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise which disturbs, annoys, or
interferes with the peace and quiet of other persons.
1
-4483-
(e)
No snowmobile shall be operated between the hours of 1:30am and
7:00am of each day on City streets, highways, roadways, and
public lands that do not abut public waters.
The proposed code reads:
705.20 Operations Generally. It shall be unlawful for any persons to drive or
operate any snowmobile in the following ways.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
No snowmobile shall be driven within 100 feet of any fisherman,
pedestrian, skating rink, or sliding area in excess of 10 MPI-I.
No snowmobile shall be driven in any area if the operation
would conflict with or endanger other persons or property.
No snowmobile shall be operated in any cemetery.
No snowmobiles shall be operated on private property of another
without permission of the
property.
No snowmobile shall be
loud, unnecessary, or
interferes with the peace
No snowmobile shall be
7:00am of each day on City
public lands that do not abut public
lawful occupant of said
a manner so as to create a
annoys, or
persons.
the hours of 1:30am and
roadways, and
Motion by Beise to accept the ordinance change. Motion by to accept the
ordinance change for discussion. Seconded by Hostetler. Discussion followed. Brown
accepted a friendly amendment from Domholt to remove "where" and substitute "if" on
part (b) of the proposed code. Brown also recommended sending the proposed changes to
the City Council for approval.
6. (a) Ci
70. Driving in Parks
overview of the existing code and the proposed highlighted
the addition of trails for planning for future parks
in the future on a case by case basis.
The
700.70.
public park
Parks. No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle in any
on roads or designated parking areas.
The proposed code reads:
700.70. Drivin~ in Parks. No person shall drive or operate a motor vehicle in any
public park except on roads, trails, or designated parking areas.
Motion by Beise to accept proposed changes to City Code 700.70. Second by
Domholt to accept the proposed changes for discussion. Discussion followed.
Motion carried. Proposed changes will be sent to the City Council for approval.
-4484-
2
o
Discuss: Park Naming
Taylor explained that commissioners were to bring their ideas for naming the new
park at the Langdon Bay/Rottlund development. Motion by Hostetler to name the
Park, Langdon Bay Park. Second by Motyka. Discussion followed in whi'ch
Brown suggested naming it Alwin Park since Alwin was such a huge contributor
to this development and the park. Further discussion followed. Taylor pointed out
that there was already a name on the table: Langdon Bay Park was put to a vote,
with 4 opposed and 3 in favor. Motion failed.
Motion by Brown to name the park, Alwin Park. Second by Beise. No discussion.
Alwin Park was put to a vote, with 4 in favor, 3 opposed. Motion carried.
Proposed park name will be sent to the City Council for
Discuss: Park Tours
Beise recommended revisiting the parks
Beise also recommended that POSAC begin
equipment so it can become part of the budget process.
another column to the current replacement schedule that would
replacement of playground equipment every year beginning in 200
in the spring.
for
adding
Brown suggested bonding, if allowable, and dedicating a portion to parks.
Discussion followed. Brown
Bonds an amount to be
parks. Second by Beise with
Park Dedication Fund for future
present this issue to the Council.
a motion to add to the General Obligation
no less than $100,000.00 to be used for
that the money be deposited in the
sion followed. Brown will
Discuss: Fundraising Ideas
Widmer had prepared numerous ideas for POSAC consideration.
Taylor asked that POSAC develop a projects and decide which ones they
to the City Council for consideration in 2004.
o
°
was asked to do research on this item. Beise was asked to
Chamber on sponsoring an even within the City of
and donating part of the profits to parks.
the Park
presented this idea and Hostetler expressed a desire to be
~ participant in this even though his term as commissioner is up at
the end of the year.
Antique Boat Show
It was determined that Todd Warner would be approached about
doing a scaled down version of this at a future date.
Pull-tabs
It was decided that Taylor would approach the VFW and request
that they consider donating 2% of their profits to parks. The
Legion and Lions also need to be approached regarding this.
-4485-
5. Blues Fest
Brown will work on this as he has already approached area
business regarding the bands, etc. There would be music,
concessions and fireworks. Work would be done to get donations
for fireworks, etc., a share of the proceeds from concessions would
go to parks.
10. Review: January, 2004 Agenda Calendar
Changes were made.
11. Reports:
Both Brown and Fackler stated that they are currently in the midst of the budget
process.
Hostetler stated that the Skate Park is making
very generous. A grand opening is scheduled fox
than a simple ribbon cutting ceremony.
'.ss. The donor has been
it will be more
Hostetler was again thanked for all his years of service to the C~
his hard work on the Skate Park. He will be missed.
and for
Motion by Beise to adjourn the meeting. Second by Domholt. Meeting adjourned at
9:25pm.
-4486-
4
Page 1 of 4
Kandis Hanson
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us>
"Leah Weyckeff <weyckerI.Central.Weston ka@weston ka. k12. mn. us>
Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:53 PM
WHCC agenda 11/19/03
Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
** Agenda -November 19, 2003 **
12:00- 1:30 PM
Gillespie Center
2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound
Any comments or questions, contact Leah Weycker, Collaborative
Coordinator,
at 952-491-8058 or
1. Lunch 12:00
Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a light "free will
donation" lunch, suggested value $6.00.
2. Introductions
3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes
4. Announcements
5. Community Statement - Speaking with One Voice
Kim Erickson Heiar, Ridgedale YMCA, will help us develop a value
position or community statement about youth chemical use. We will be
building on the energy and information that we generated last month.
High school youth will be present to tell us what they need from adults
in our community.
"Try, try again."
-- William Edward Hickson
** Advisory Group Updates
Health
Sandy Olstad, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke, Carol Miletti,
Kevin Erickson
Camp T.O.A.D. (Teenagers Overcoming Anxiety and Depression) will take
place on November 21-23 at Sterns Boy Scout Camp in Annandale. We still
need student spots to fill and can take another whole group of 4
students with a counselor. Please pass on the information!
Youth Activities
-4487- 11/12/2003
Page 2 of 4
Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Kathy Jones, Kim
Erickson Heiar
The skate park is coming together beautifully. The nice weather this
week will give us more time to pour concrete. Many visitors to the site
are anxious to see it completed. Wet concrete! !
The after school activity bus will run for 115 days this year. For $1 a
ride, students are picked up at the middle and high school and driven
within 2 blocks of their house.
Parent Education
Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Bill Erickson, Amy Taggart
The parent group would like to look at nutrition in the schools.
Parent advocate, Amy Taggart, is helping gather information on topics
we discuss and ways to mobilize and empower parents.
Community
Margaret Holste, Carol Olson, Ginny Lozano, Jeanette Metz, Dena
Kuenzel
Planning continues for the housing information fair scheduled for March
9, 2004 at the Gillespie Center. We will have presentations for first
time home owners, renters, and senior citizens, as well as a resource
fair.
Executive
Craig Anderson, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy
Raushendorfer, Mary Hughes
The Executive group met to discuss the next steps for coming up with
the community statement about youth chemical use. A town meeting will be
planned at the next WHCC meeting.
Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County
The Alliance meetings are now featuring topics of interest to community
and Collaborative issues. Leah and Carol Olson are the voting members
and will pass on good information. Anyone is welcome to attend. A light
dinner is served. Free food!
** Minutes - October 22, 2003 **
Present: Kathy Jones, Jim Kurtz, Kim Erickson-Heiar, JeanAnn Thayer,
Sandy Olstad, Jeanette Metz, Deb Truesdell, Sandy Rauschendorfer, Amy
Taggart, Sandy Wind, Gwenn Spence, Cheryl Fischer, Ginny Lozano, Bill
Erickson, Leah Weycker, Carol Olson, Johanna Eckman, Gene Zulk, Margaret
Holste
Guests: Laura Collins, Heidi Baill, and Mike Lamprecht, Westonka
School Psychologists; Sarah Baker, Meg MacLean, and Tina Kampa, MWHS
Counselors; Candy Shelso-Wells, Patty Miller, Sue Cathers, and Para
Yaeger, parents; Sharon MacDonald, Speaker; Jeannie Cunningham,
Hennepin County; Paul Falls, Minnetrista Police; Tamara Bomar, Lake
Minnetonka Chamber
-4488- 11/12/2003
Page 3 of 4
1. Introductions: Members and guests introduced themselves as well as
their role in the community.
2. Additions or Changes to the Agenda and Minutes: There were no
changes to the agenda. Jeanette moved, seconded by Sandy R., that the
minutes be approved with the correction that the item in "Announcements"
regarding the impact of county budget cuts on the Westonka Library be
listed as a separate item. Motion carried.
3. Announcements:
* Sandy Olstad shared information about Dr. Dick Hardel's presentation
on "Spirituality and Aging" on November 20th at 1 p.m. at the Gillespie
Center following their noon Thanksgiving Dinner.
* JeanAnn shared information about a workshop "Creating Respectful,
Responsible Children on December 18, 2003 in St. Cloud, MN from 8:30
a.m. to 3 p.m. featuring Dr. Charles Fay, the author of the books Corwin
Kronenberg recommended at his recent presentation in our community.
* Leah shared that progress is being made on the Skate Park. She also
mentioned that we've been approved for the $20,000 Kids Stability grant
being used for the Excel and Learning Labs program at MWHS.
* The Youth Drop-in Center got off to a slow start, but GMS staff plan
to do more advertising at school to interest more students. The YMCA
staff person is from Camp Christmas Tree which gives a nice connection
between the schools and the camp. Some students are using scholarships
to attend so, in the future, we'll need to review usage and the amount
we've designated.
* The next WHCC meeting is November 19, 2003. There is no meeting in
December.
4. Local Collaborative Time Study (LCTS) Financing Framework: 5% of
funds generated throughout the county have gone to the Children's Mental
Health Collaborative. There is a task force reviewing how funds are
allocated, and their proposal will be reviewed at a future WHCC meeting.
5. Sharon MacDonald, "Reduce the Use" Community Coalition, Hopkins,
spoke about the program, the result of a town meeting in 1999 which
focused on dealing with the results of the 1998 MN Student Survey. A
mission statement was developed regarding what the community stood for
with regard to healthy youth and reducing use: "to provide a healthy
community environment where more of our youth will choose not to use
tobacco, alcohol and marijuana and where the community speaks with one
voice regarding illegal chemical use." Sharon described this last part
as the most important.
She shared information from the Student Survey for the western suburbs,
highlighting the early and regular use of alcohol and marijuana among
the 9th and 12th graders surveyed. She also gave information about the
impact of chemical use on brain functions, including reduction of memory
and motivation with regular marijuana use, The brain develops "pathways
of pleasure" from the experience, and the chance of adult addiction is 5
times greater if drinking starts before age 15. With the scientific
evidence of the impact of chemical use on the brain and it's
-4489- 11/12/2003
Page 4 of 4
development, the "scientific approach" seems a better way to engage
adults rather than an approach based on "morality." Since the frontal
cortex (CEO or "voice of reason") is the last part of the brain to
develop, adolescents don't think about consequences. Yet, every kid is
faced with making a decision about chemical use. Therefore, our job as
adults is to help them anticipate their choices and the consequences.
As part of the planning Process for Reduce the Use in Hopkins, a survey
was conducted with young people at the beginning of the grant with a
follow-up survey after three years. Results showed three significant
factors in reducing youth chemical use: parents talking with kids about
marijuana use, parents monitoring alcohol at home, and parents talking
with the parents of their child's friends about drugs. The surveys
showed that kids use less when parents disapprove of the behavior:
parent disapproval greatly reduced tobacco use and to a somewhat lesser
degree, the use of marijuana. Their disapproval had less impact on the
use of alcohol so "there's lots of work to be done with alcohol use,"
according to Sharon. The strategies selected by the Hopkins program for
2003-04 include using a scientific focus, broadening interventions,
involving under represented groups, continuing enforcement/diversion
programs to create consequences, and imbedding messages in school
building site plans. (More information is available on their website at
Sharon recommended the following next steps for our group: develop a
community message, speak with one voice (all adults), and promote
inclusion. To begin the process of developing a community message for
Westonka, Sharon asked us to determine components we felt must be
included. Ideas generated by the group included:
*Parent responsibility
*Adults take responsibility - education - empower adults
*Teach about advertising
*Consequences for adults/child (legal)
*Adult behavior is different than teens (scientific basis)
*Brain development - facts (scientific)
*Tips for parents - when a problem develops -vulnerabilities -
transition times
*Parent partnerships
*Communication links
The WHCC Executive Committee will meet before the next general meeting
to determine a plan for developing a community message for Westonka when
we meet again.
Kim made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Deb T. The
motion was approved unanimously.
Margaret Holste, Recorder
-4490- 11/12/2003
Government,r,
e rm. can save. only so much money
ofdropping tlY irvi
'~ 'g°ve~en~ ' We're ~wavs
~ .. !oo~g for more oppomniae% [
~" t~ pro, de better .~ue for ~e
~ere's a lot of t~ atout ~ ~;~ c~ens' t~ do~s. But ~ere's'
:~: a ~t to ~at we ~'do, ~d
government reform these days.'
Like private businesses ad-
justing to the latest economic
downturn, state and local
governments are also strag-
gling with ways to meet our
now-perennial . budget chal-
lenges. We're all redesigning,
reinventing, reforming and
restructuring -- leaving no "re"
unturned. In fact, the adminis-
tration of Gov. Tim Pawlenty is
banking our state's budget on
the,. ability of. s. tate and !oc~
government to achieve sig-
nifiCant productivity refon~sl
It has largely capped· spending
for tile next four years, and is
counting on productivity gains
to lower costs. With those gains,
higher taxes won't be necessary
"to avoid service cuts.
i Refonn's a. pretty attractive
~concept. Delivering more for'
'less: Achieving gain without pain.
Unfortunately, any significant re-
ductions am often as ephemeral
as those produced by pills that
"burn fat while Y°u Sleep."
· It's not that public agencies
don't try to be more efficient.
The fact is, we've already
· achieved a lot of savings over
the years to hold down taxes.
State agencies, cities, coun-
ties and school .districts have
already merged and consoli-
'dated services, and created
thousands of cooperative part-
inerships.
· In Minnetonka alone, our
".many joint ventures rangefrom
· a combined recreation program
with' the city'of Hopkins, to a
':new public works building that
;houses both city and Hennepin
County staff and equipment, to
combined sports and cultural
facilities serving both city and
school district programs. We've
formed numerous multi-city
collaborations for such far-
flung activities as computer
i servicesl employee health ben-
efits, building inspections,
d~al .prosecution, cable~
franchises, .polide communica-
' t ions and homeland '~security
it has nothing to do.with Com-
mitment or competence. Quite
simply, the roles are different
for government.
· Like all businesses, govem-
merits experience rising costs.
But unlike private bUsinesses,
we cannot unJlaterany choose
our client base, nor the prod-
ucts we wish to sell, nor the
ge6graphic market area:we
serve.
While We're. always trying.
to Operate more efficiently, I
we don't have the luxury of[
selectively eliminating un-
profitable product lines, such
as police and. fire protection.
Nor refusing' to educate the
high-maintenance students.
Nor dropping those streets
that are the most cosily to.
maintain.
Neither '..do we even 'have"
much say over the prices we
charge. Like private businesses,
we obviously have to be sensi-
tive to the tax and service fee
"market." However, private
businesses aren't hamstrung by
'no-tax pledges and levy limi.ts.
No responsible, corporate
CEO would ever promise to
freeze prices" indefinitel,y;
President. Richard. 'Nixons
wage and' price controls.
didn't .make any more sense
for the private sector than
sala~ free~zes and levy limits
do :~f~r cities, counties and
schbol districts.
. .~eal productivity, gains
are;: achieved through labor-
sa~ng capital investments
in~.ew technologies, such as
au~mation., Without such
gax~s,, revenue freezes merely
trafislate into layoffs and ser-
vic~ cuts.'
Historically,' the most
sigtfificant 'p'ro'ductivity ad- '
vancements have been in.
manufactclring, agriculture
and even some labor-inten-
sive service areas. However,
eres a distinct d~fference"
between public and private
services.. Many of our ser-
-4491-
THOMAS W. REESE
5641 BARTLETT BLVD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
tw~ars@winmmeLcom tel.952-472-4435
November 4,2853
Ms Kandis Hanson
City Manager
5341Maywood Rd
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms Hanson:
First of all ret me compliment you for your readership
through the Mound Visions Project. It has been a 38+ year
wait. I don't know who should get the primary credit.
Certainly we have the most foreword-thinking mayor in a
generation.
Now allow me to drop the other shoe. I welcomed your
Clean Sweep initiative. Former Councilperson Liz Jensen
and I spent many years on the Ptanning Commission tryin§ to
clean up the yard junk around town. Your Clean Sweep
seemed like an organized way to get it done. Unfortunately
from my experience, it woutd be a lot more effective if it
were actively pursued.
A few months ago I turned over to you pictures and
addresses of some offending properties. You turned them
over apparently to the CSO. Since, nothing has happened
that woutd visually change anything and my feed back as an
interested citizen has.been near zero.
The Eddie's garage at 1632 Commerce, the north
entrance to our city looks tike an i11 kept junkyard. I
supptied the CSO a copy of the ordinance that allowed, I
believe only 19 outside storage spots. That day, a typical
one, there Were 42 there. I gave you a picture of 4841
Bartlett, a mess with inoperabte cars and generat junk, and
of 5628 Bartlett, across from my house. Here he had
several, unticensed, junk trucks and other items. I heard
nothing for a while. Then the CSO called and said he had
good news: the trucks were now licensed. Of course they
were stir1 inoperable, looked like junk, and had been
joined by 6 or 8 snowmobiles, three fish houses, a pontoon
boat, a couple trailers, and some other draped
unidentifiable items. The CSO atso said that they were
-4492-
"working on 4841" That was many,, many weeks-ago. Nothing
since.
If you hope to invite citizen assistance in the CIean
Sweep task, you won't get it by such poor communication and
tack of identifiable results.
You said something that has bothered me ever since.
You said that the police and city staff cannot be expected
to do this kind of observation, because they are so busy
and that you only have "one person for each job" and they
are att occupied. I cannot accept that. One of the police
department's principal jobs is to cruise the city and
observe everything that takes place within sight or
hearing. Similarly, you have water and street department
crews who work daily in the neighborhoods. That could be a
good help to bolster the program. Neighbors are
understandably reluctant to snitch on neighbors, no matter
how irresponsible they are. AND if those who are brave
enough to snitch get no results, the program is doomed to
mediocrity.
Yours for a better Mound,
/'~se
~/"cc. Pat ~eiset, Mayor
-4493-
JAMES E. KURTZ
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE:
_-
5341 Maywood Road Telephone (952) 472-0621
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch (763) 525-6210
Fax (952) 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
November 10, 2003
Mr. Thomas W. Reese
5641 Bartlett Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Reese,
This letter is a follow-up to the letter you sent City Manager Kandis Hanson on
November 4, 2003.
Beginning this month, City Planner Sarah Smith and I will be starting an Ordinance
Enforcement Team. The purpose of the team is to identify local residential and
commercial properties that are in violation of city code. The team is part of the City
Manager's Clean Sweep Initiative. The team will consist of members from the police and
building departments.
In the mean time, I have the list of properties that you have identified and we will give
them first priority. If you identify other properties, please contact me at 952/472-0623, or
at j ameskurtz@cityofmound, com
Sincerely,
~---~-Yarn~s E. Kurtz '
Chief of Police
-4494-
Code Enforcement Team
Agenda '
November 14, 2003
Present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Building Inspector Matt
Simoneau, Mike Woeken, Community Service Officer, Todd Truax, Jim Kurtz
· The purpose of the team is to identify enforcement strategies for city code
violations. ,.
· Enforcement Plan
· Immediate Problems
· Training
· Follow-up, meetings
-4495-
To:
From:
Code Enforcement Team:
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Matt Simoneau, Building Inspector
Todd Truax, Sergeant
Mike Wocken, Community Service Officer
Chief Jim Kurtz
Date:
November 17, 2003
Subject: Meeting
Thank you for participating in the Code Enforcement Team, Here is a list of the items we
discussed and that we wanted to work on before our next meeting.
1. Sarah is going to talk with the Planning Commission to see if they would sponsor
a Community Forum on nuisance violations. The goal of the Forum would be to
get the public's input on nuisance priorities and enforcement.
2. Jim and Todd will reexamine the nuisance ordinance and a proposed
Administrative Citation Program.
3. Todd will develop enforcement strategies using police resources.
4. Mike will attempt to compose a list of people who have been "complainants" in
nuisance violations. The list will be used to invite people to the Forum.
Our goal is to have a comprehensive enforcement plan to address nuisance violations by
spring of 2004.
I will touch base with all of you to find a good date to meet in December. Thank you
-4496-
October 6, 2003
5901 Sunnyfield Rd. E
Minnetrista, MN 55364
952.491.8058
fax 952.491.8043
weyckerL@ westonka.kl 2.nm.us
www. westonka.org
Seeking to strengthen and
connect our community in
healthy, creative ways.
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mayor Meisel and Mound City Council
Mound Park Commission
Leah Weycker, Zero Gravity Skatepark Task Force
Signage for Zero Gravity Skatepark
For your information, find the proposed language for Zero Gravity
Skatepark signage. This language has been reviewed and changed by
John Dean, city attorney. The final language will need to be approved by
the City's insurance company.
The rules sign will be an outdoor quahty, permanent sign that can be
changed yearly ff needed. The blue color will match the water fountain
already purchased. We are still researching vendors for the signs. See
sample attached.
We are looking at a cast aluminum recognition plaque to be purchased
after all the donors are secure. The recognition plaque will be placed on
the inside or outside wall of the shelter building. The hst of donors will
be done in order of financial contribution as low as $1,000. There is still
time to get your name on the plaque!
Skatepark Status:
Look at the hole at the skate park site. We are thrilled to have that step
done and are now working with the cement crew and contractors to
coordinate construction of the bowls. If all goes well, we will have the
cement pored smooth and dry before the snow flies.
Sincerely~ ,
Leah M. Weycker
Collaborative Coordinator
ZG Skatepark Task Force
cc. Gene Hostetler
Jim Faclder
-4497-
RULES SIGN: Needs final approval of insuranoe company.
City of Mound Parks Division
Zero Gravity Skatepark
Hours of Operation 8:00 am - 10:00 pm
This facility is unsupervised. Skate at your own risk. The city is not responsible for
injuries resulting from your activities. Use of this facility may result in serious injury.
· Personal protective gear is strongly recommended.
Gear includes helmet, wrist, elbow and knee pads.
· Use only skates, in-line skates, skateboards, or bmx bikes.
· No motorized devices or street bicycles.
· No waxing, defacing or vandalizing of these facilities.
For equal enjoyment of this park by all, please observe these common courtesies:
· No food or beverages inside the skating area.
· No glass containers anywhere in the park.
· No chairs, benches, tables or other objects inside the skating area.
Skating/skateboarding has resulted in death, brain damage, broken bones and other
serious injuries.
SKATE AT YOUR OWN RISK!
RECOGNITION PLAQUE: Based on the criteria set up in our donor packet. In order of dollar value
of donation up to $1,000.
Zero Gravity Skatepark Grand Opening- October 15, 2003
The skate park task force wishes to thank the entire community for contributing to the
design and construction of this skate park. Many community volunteers and financial
donors are responsible for the park as well as the major sponsors listed below.
Gene Hostetler, Sandy Rauschendorfer, Anne Wilbur and Leah Weycker
Special thanks to:
Marafie Foundation
Gene Hostetler, Gene Allen Design
Tom Stokes, Brenshell Homes
City of Mound
Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
City of Minnetrista
Shorewood Tree Service
Dobenzinski and Sons, Inc.
Kurt Luthold Family Foundation
Imperial Developers, Inc.
Mohawk Jaycees
Heikes Farms Inc.
Imperial
VFW Post 5113
Carol Olson
XX
XX
XX room for donors yet to come
-4498-
30"
CAST ALUM. PLAQUE
W/F, AI.~ED COPY
AND
Ali deign, monufacturing, mproduc~n,
~e, a~ sole d th~ ~m~f ~ ;tr~ly
pmhib~ed ~ the ~n
GSR GR~ INC. Th~s do~n~
u~e~a~ ~1 the rec{pie~
co~n~ ~ ~ ~ copl~, m~uced
GSR GROU~ INC. o~ ~nt, mr
s~ll any d~n ~a~es u~q~ · ~h~s
Drawn By:. MK
Date: 9/22/03
Scale: AS NOTED
Rev:
Rev:
X
SIGN ABOVE FOR
FINAL APPROVAL
2
-4499-
34"
ELE¥,~I'ION: DIF DIF, ECTIONAL
5CALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"
j-'- ALUM. FACE5 AND
3" F-,OUND TUEE,~
FTD. I~LUE WI VINYL
CO?Y
....-- F, EMOVAELE ALUM,
FACE5
W/VINYL COFY
design, mond~dutia~,
use, e~ sole ~ ~cum~
GS~ G~OU~ I~. Thi~ docu~.t
w~e or ~, or
~led in ~
G~ GROU~ iNC. a~ ~ip~nl,
s~l o~ d~ign ~lums u~ue ~ ~is
d~ument ~ inco~
~r~,
Drawn By: MK
Date: 9/22/03
Sca[e: AS NOTED
Rev:
P-,ev:
Eev:
x
SIGN ABOVE FOR
FINAL APPROVAL
O ~
-4500-
Metropolitan Council
Building communities that work
November 17, 2003
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City Of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd
Mound, MN 55364-1687
Dear Ms. Hanson:
In a letter dated September 10, 2003, the Metropolitan Council sent a copy of your community's
current forecasts for review prior to the adoption of a new Regional Framework. Based on
information provided by your community, the Council has agreed to make the following overall
forecast changes for your community.
Revised forecasts based on community input (left blank where no change was made)
1990 200b 2010 5020 2030
Households
PopulatiOn' ·. ,.:.,~ . ~. : ~.
Employment 1,860 2,020 2,170
Original forecasts sent for review
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Households 3,710 3,982 4,350 4,600 4,800
Populmion 9,634 9,435 10,400 11,000 11,400
Employment 1,849 1,709 2,500 3,000 3,450
For questions about the pr°p0sed:population Or household-' changes please contact Michael Munson,
(651) 602-1331. For questiOns about the employment forecasts please contact Regan Carlson, (651)
602-1407.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Best Regards;
www.metrocouncil.org
Metro Info Line 602-1888
230 East Fifth Street * St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 * (651) 602-1000 · Fax 602-1550 * TTY 291-0904
21.501
November 2oo3
Dear Friend of WeCAN,
Western Communities Action Network (WeCAN) has been helping neighbors in our
community for over 14 years. Our mission is to provide basic human services in a respectful
way to individuals and families in our twelve city service area~ to enhance family stability and
self-sufficiency.
In 2002 we were able to assist over 900 families with our programs, services and
referrals. WeCAN provided emergency assistance, employment counseling, and family support
to our neighbors in need. Our Meals on Wheels program provided 8,000 hot meals delivered by
our dedicated volunteers. The Adopt a Family program for the holidays is currently underway.
During this past year, continued economic uncertainty along with job lay-offs, has
affected more families trying to make ends meet. The needs of our neighbors are growing in a
time when funding resources are shrinking. State, county and local budget reductions are
impacting WeCAN's annual resources. Now, more than ever before, we need the support of the
communities we serve. As we enter the holiday season of giving, would you consider giving a
contribution to help a neighbor in need?
We appreciate the generosity of our donors and work hard to utilize those funds in an
efficient manner. Your gift to WeCAN goes a long way to help families in need. Please give
generously to support our programs.
WeCAN..,the connecting bridge of the Community.
Best wishes to you and your family during this holiday season.
David L. Sutton, President Ginnyj~zano
WeCAN Board of Directors Executive Director
~WeCAN serves the following communities: Greenfield, Loretto, Independence, Maple Plain,
Minnetrista, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, Rockford, Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, Tonka Bay
and western Orono.
Thanks for your contribution to WeCAN!
(All donations are tax deductible)
Friend ($15-$5o) Good Neighbor ($51-$1oo) __Supporter($1ol-$25o)
Neighborhood Leader($251-$499) Community Leader($5oo +)
(Please enclose in return envelope.)
Yes, my employer will match my contribution:
Yes.* I am interested in volunteering. Please call me!
.(Name of company)
(Contact name and phone no.)
Name
Phone No.
If you do not wish your name published in a WeCAN newsletter for your contribution, please cheek:
Yes, WeCAN!
"Unless we think of others and do something for them, we will miss one of the greatest sources of happiness."
-Ray Wilbur
-4502-
-4503-
DO'~ O~90~Z,~' U::)~NI'I~u~ ~,,IO/::INN~N :I),IU-I NO~..-I NUO<:;-"I~O £OO~-0D-1:1:
-4504-
£0'~ 0D90D~.~' 0.1. I:l::)l'NI-t~u~ ~NOJ_'qNN:~N ':INIS-I NO~._-I N1:11:(;:80 £00E-0~-~:~:
GENERALFUND
Taxes
Business Licenses
Non-Business
Licenses and
Permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Other Revenue
Street Lighting Fee
Charges to Other
Departments
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
Oct. 2003
83.33%
Oct. 2003 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE. VARIANCE RECEIVED
2,290,070 0 1,291,324 (998,746) 56.39%
6,930 5,000 13,540 6,610 195.38%
263,150 22,754 224,519 (38,631) 85.32%
502,930 0 165,282 (337,648) 32;86%
97,800 9,398 113,952 16,152 116.52%
117,000 0 77,041 (39,959) 65.85%
215,290 8,356 130,999 (84,291) 60.85%
0 8,806 44,072 44,072
14.000 2.999 10,092 (3.908) 72.09%
TOTAL REVENUE
3,507,170 57,313 2,070,821 (1.436.349) 59.05%
FIRE FUND
CEMETERY FUND
DOCK FUND
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
LIQUOR FUND
RECYCLING FUND
STORM WATER UTILITY
550,410 54,361 521,140 (29,270) 94.68%
5,000 1,200 3,995 (1,005) 79.90%
103,400 0 116,008 12,608 112.19%
625,000 61,070 498,395 (126,605) 79.74%
1,100,000 112,367 952,589 (147,411 ) 86.60%
2,110,000 157,997 1,764,378 (345,622) 83.62%
129,000 14,492 116,133 (12,867) 90.03%
115,000 9,643 92,196 (22,804) 80.17%
11/19~2003
rev01
Gino
-4505-
GENERAL FUND
Council
Promotions
City Manager/Clerk
Elections
Finance
Assessing
Legal
City Hall Building & Srvcs
Computer
Police
Emergency Prepardeness
Planning/Inspections
Streets
Parks
Transfers
Cable TV
Contingencies
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
Area Fire
Service Fund
Cemetery Fund
Dock Fund
TIF 1-2
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Liquor Fund
Recycling Fund
Storm Water Utility
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
Oct. 2003
83.33%
Oct. 2003 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED
75,990 11,672 64,776 11,214
3,750 45 3,795 (45)
257,150 28,778 209,222 47,928
1,080 0 326 754
215,100 24,009 179,273 35,827
79,630 35 83,262 (3,632)
t35,550 i 4,898 106,065 29,485
172,650 10,401 143,987 28,663
28,640 2 11,522 17,118
1,260,850 178,202 1,008,742 252,108
7,130 65 1,621 5,509
270,010 35,727 259,014 10,996
671,450 55,373 412,767 258,683
361,130 37,217 262,779 98,351
203,350 16,946 169,459 33,891
50,000 0 21,904 28,096
44,290 0 2,298 41,992
3.837.750 413,370 2,940,812 896,938
85.24%
101.20%
81.36%
30.19%
83.34%
104.56%
78.25%
83.40%
40.23%
80,00%
22.73%
95.93%
61.47%
72.77%
83.33%
43.81%
5.19%
76.63%
510,410 136,152 554,113 (43,703) 108.56%
9,140 0 1,791 7,349 19.60%
141,230 8,271 44,329 96,901 31.39%
0 18,622 345,140 (345,140)
679,880 52,803 482,310 197,570 70.94%
1,121,210 81,734 907,514 213,696 80.94%
495,850 48,358 421,225 74,625 84.95%
163,310 13,413 121,288 42,022 74.27%
92,910 1,861 87,517 5,393 94.20%
Exp-02
11/19/2003
Gino
-4506-
General Fund $1,023,171
CDBG 1,581
Area Fire Protection Services 164,834
Grant Revolving 0
Cemetery (2,643)
Dock 206,468
PW Facility 72,234
G.O. Improvement Bonds 86,497
Commerce Place TIF (143,316)
TIF 1'2 Notes 86,865
G.O. Bonds 2001. A 9,434
G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 56,245
HRA Lease Rev Bonds (950)
Capital Improvement 746,613
MSA 14,860
Sealcoat 67,259
CDB 3,654
Downtown TIF 1-2 3,045,686
HRA Public Safety Bldg (765,784)
Water 1,668,205
Sewer 1,158,232
Liquor Store (294,836)
Recycling 55,183
Storm Water 290,688
Fire Relief (191,088)
HRA 383
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included.
A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the
independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report
will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties.
In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds
available for spending.
11/1912003
CashReportCouncil
Gino
-4507-
DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
November 18, 2003
Present: Commissioners Jim Funk, Greg Eurieh, Frank Ahrens and Gerald Jones,
Council Representative Mark Hanus, Mayor Pat Meisel, Park
Superintendent Jim Fackler, Dock Administrator Katie Hoff and Secretary
Denice Widmer
Citizens Present:
Michelle Olson 2060
Gay Hofteig 2216
Neill Ward 2173
Scott Kempf 2207
Jane Kempf 2207
Richard Swearengin 4650
Patty Burke 3147
Mark Anderson 2873
Wende Brady 217
Waterside Lane
Noble Lane
Centerview Lane
Centerview Lane
Centerview Lane
Manchester Road
aRe
,ane
enterview Lane
Chair Jim Funk called the meeting to order
Approval of September 18~ 2003 Minutes
Motion by Ahrens to approve the September 18, 21
Motion carried.
Second by Funk.
2. Agenda Changes.
3. Comments and
Citizens. None
4. Interview of D~
Chair Funk led the in
1. Please describe
would ,ou for
Olson stated that she
2060 Waterside Lane
or life ~enenee that .you have had that
of this commission.
a Sunday School teacher, worked with the
MS Society on fundraisers, the Cancer Society. Likes to listen and organize.
Feels she would be a good asset as she has lived on the commons for over 20
yrs. Ahrens asked what problems she has seen as an abutter. Olson stated
the following: parking, electricity, bathrooms, boat oil.
2. What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work
of this commission?
Olson stated that she has been self-employed for 22 yrs. Feels it is easy to
get the job done if you listen and take care of problems individually.
3. With what you know about the Mound area~ what do you see as the three most
significant issues this commission will need to address in the next two years?
Olson stated: Never enough docks, Storage, Fact that Mound is not a
glamour community. Funk asked what Olson felt was the best way to
address the waiting list. Olson stated that in the past, the commons was only
available to the neighbors in the area, but since it has opened up to
everyone in the city, parking is a problem as well as a lack of respect and
-4508-
responsibility. Olson stated she hates the idea of adding more boats when
there are already limited resources. Hanus asked if she has visited commons
other than her own. Olson stated she has made a point of visiting areas such
as Dreamwood and other areas. She has noticed that parking and lack of
space are a problem in those areas as well as her own.
4. What one or two contributions do you think you would make in the short
term and in the long term?
In the short term, Olson stated more respect and responsibility. In the long
term, Olson stated she wants to evaluate what can be done to solve over-
crowding, parking, etc.
5. Please disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this
board.
Olson stated there were none. Eurich asked what her opinion of the abutter,
non-abutter isSUe Was. Ols0n stated she to use common
sense and have respect for each other.
Olson was asked if she had any questio~
none at this time. Funk thanked her for
stated that the applicant would be notified of
she was selected, it would sent to the council for
January, 2004.
and she stated she had
and interest. Fackler
of the vote and that if
and she would begin in
5. Discuss: Fees
Hanus stated that the Council was requesting that the DCAC come up with a
long-term plan so as not to deplete the Fund balance. Discussion followed. Mayor
Meisel stated that the DCAC needs to look at splitting fees so that the multiples at
least are paying for themselves rather than being subsidized by other dock
program participants. Meisel also stated that she preferred scheduling the
increas~l~l~ated that she was hoping to have the fees raised in 2004, but
Fun~ted t~CAC had already made the decision not to raise fees in
2~anus askedl~this be made a specific agenda item for discussion. It was
ffec~add this t~ February, 2005 Agenda Calendar.
6. Discuss: (~l~e~rview MJ~ltiple with Residents Present
Fackler gav~ef~rview of the multiple docks program. There were six
dock site holdel~rent out of 16. Of those 6, only one was for the multiple
dock.dock. _OneOne stated4~liatstated at hehe ihas a lift and multiple boats, so a multiple would not
work for him. Another stated that he has been in the program for many years
and could see no reason to change now. Another stated that he has seen an
increase in fees and sees the writing on the wall so multiples scare him. Funk
stated that the goal of the DCAC is to keep fees low in order to accommodate the
general population.
Hanus pointed out that the city's docks program is unique in that it is self-
maintaining. The Docks Fund is not part of the General Fund. One site holder
expressed that she was appalled at the thought of the loss of their peace and
tranquility. She also stated that she didn't trust the DCAC not to eliminate the
-4509-
lower and middle income people in order to accommodate the "fat cats". The
gentleman who was for the multiple stated that he did have concerns over
parking, but that he sees the whole docks program as a blessing and a gift.
When asked who the final decision makers are, the DCAC and Faclder pointed
out to those present that it was not their goal to force anyone into the multiple
program. They stated that it comes down to interest~ if there is some interest~
they may decide to do a smaller multiple. If there is no interest, nothing will
happen. Funk then thanked everyone for coming and suggested polling the dock
site holders again in order to get feedback from everyone involved in order to
make a decision on whether or not to go ahead with the mt de. A letter will be
sent to each dock site holder and the results will be on 2004 Agenda.
Discuss: Request from Ronald Bauer for Use
Spaces (It shOuld be noted
unable to attend the meeting.)
Dock
~at he WOuld be
Motion by Funk to table this issue until Mr. Bauer could be in
Second by Ahrens. Motion carried.
8. Discuss: 2003 Final Report
DCAC asked Katie Hoff questic
Brief discussion followed.
the information she had provided.
9. Discuss: LMCD License Status
Fackler gave a brief overview of this
2004, but they will run into a problem
for 2004. Fackler asked that a
Discussion followed.
at the numbers are okay for
005, so this needs to be an agenda item
set to not allow anymore shares.
recommend to the Council that a moratorium be set to not
2004 season. Second by Funk. Discussion followed.
Moti~
Motion c~
the meeting 15 more minutes. Second by Ahrens.
More discussi,
moratorium issue followed. Motion carried.
10.
Discuss: Dock Location Map Changes
There was a brief discussion on the changes. Motion by Jones to accept the
2004 Dock Location Map changes. Second by Eurich. Motion Carried.
11.
Review: Shoreline Lineal Footage Study
Fackler stated that when the new shoreline map is completed, he will have
copies made for all the commissioners. Fackler stated this should be done by
the first of the year.
-4510-
12.
Review: December and January Agenda Calendars
December meeting is cancelled. Packet will still be sent out. Centerview
Multiple Survey results added to January Agenda.
Motion by Ahrens to extend the meeting to 10:30pm. Second by Funlc Motion
carried.
Discussion on candidate, Michelle Olson, followed. Unanimous decision to elect her
as the new Commissioner. Recommendation will be sent to the Council for their
approval.
Motion by Jones to adjourn. Second by Eurich. Motion
at 10:22pm.
.g adjourned
-4511 -
In the month of September, the police department responded to 567 calls for service.
There were 25 Part I offenses reported including 4 burglaries, 20 larcenies, and one
aggravated assault.
There were 103 Part II offenses reported, which included 14 criminal damage to property
reports, 14 DWI, 5 domestic assaults, 7 weapons, and 20 alcohol investigations.
The police department responded to 399 additional events including medical
emergencies, accidents, and animal complaints.
To date, the police department has handled over 8,600 incidents and contacts. This
represents an increase of 12% from last year.
Our patrol officers issued 107 citations for incidents including driving after revocation,
no insurance, open bottle, and speeding. In addition, they issued 56 written warning
tickets for violations including junk vehicles, equipment, and insurance.
On September 16, 2003 at 02:096 hours, Officer Murray responded to an alarm at
Grandview Middle School. Upon arrival, he found all of the doors to the school secure
except for the rear loading dock area. Officer Murray entered the building and
immediately found a male standing inside with his arms full of ice cream bars. Murray
grabbed the male, pulled him out of the building, and placed him under arrest for
burglary. The building was searched and no other suspects were located.
On September 21, 2003 at approximately 23:31 hours, Officer Schoenherr stopped a
vehicle for erratic driving in the 2300 block of Commerce Boulevard. As he spoke to the
driver he smelled a strong odor of an alcohol beverage coming from him. When
questioned about the odor coming from him, the driver denied drinking alcohol. He then
identified himself verbally as Thomas Jeffrey Anderson DOB 02-03-78. The suspect was
later arrested for DWI and for providing false information by giving his brother's name
and date-of-birth.
In the month of September, our investigative unit investigated incidents including,
assault, internet fraud, child protection, burglary, and credit card fraud.
Detective Swanson investigated and formally charged a Mound resident for Terrorist
Threats and Obstructing the Legal Process after officers responded to a domestic
incident. During the investigation, Swanson learned that the female suspect went to a
-4512-
house belonging to her x-husband's girlfriend and threatened to kill her. The suspect was
upset over a child-custody matter and fought with officers at the scene. In her possession
was a knife and a tire iron.
Detective Niccum received information that a male has been selling cocaine at Indian
Knoll Manor. Niccum located the male and issued him a trespassing notice preventing the
man from going onto the property. He subsequently arrested the man two times for
violating the trespassing notice.
CSO Wocken responded to 183 calls for service and our Reserve Officers donated over a
t t4 hours, -The. Re~serves spent over 30 hoursptaying-'~bad guys? for ~our building search
classes. During the role playing, the Reserve Officers were shot with rubber bullets,
sprayed with inert chemical agent, handcuffed, and searched. The Reserves also helped
with traffic during the home coming parade.
This month the police department hosted a series of building search classes. The classes
were taught by Champlin Police Detective Bob Penney and myself and took place at the
Krause house located next to the Gillespie Center. The classes were designed to be very
realistic and included role players, simunitions (rubber bullets) and inert chemical agent.
The lesson plan included searching techniques such as; quick peeks, slicing the pie,
limited penetration, stairwells, contact/cover, leap forging, and cross-overs. The classes
were taught to over 45 lake-area police officers.
I implemented two pohce committees this month to look at our reports and uniforms. The
report committee is made up of Officers Sussman, Petz and Shirley. Their goal is to
examine our report writing system and identify outdated forms and develop new ones that
are easy to understand and use. The uniform committee consists of Officers Burke,
Murray, and Schoenherr. Their goal is to document all of our current uniforms (brands,
makes, and models) and to make recommendations for changes if they are warranted.
Respectfully submitted,
James E. Kurtz
Chief of Police
-4513-
Harbor Wine & Spirits Nov 2003
Date Weather Cust 03 Cust 02 Varience 2003 2002
11/1/2003 cloudyrain 485 465 20 10678.78 7026.58
11/2/2003 558 -558 8869.53
11/3/2003 cloudyrain 208 208 2873.39
11/4/2003 cloudyrain 212 297 -85 3077.43 3452,97
11/5/2003 coldcloudy 225 279 -54 3202.28 3579.3
11/6/2003 sunny/cool 249 270 -21 4225.54 3811.06
11/7/2003 sunny/cold 381 352 29 6950.15 4816.57
11/8/2003 sunny 406 477 -71 8355.83 6997.63
11/9/2003 603 -603 9431.61
11/10/2003 cloudy 231 231 3526.73
11/11/2003 SUNNY 222 273 -51 3478.56 3228.25
11/12/2003 sunny 243 264 -21 3946.99 3319.78
11/13/2003 snowy 221 267 -46 3400.89 3324.58
11/14/2003 sunny 440 279 161 7729.64 3520.44
11/15/2003 cloudy 448 472 -24 9068.17 7579.87
11/16/2003 537 -537 9149.85
11/17/2003 cloudy 243 243 3745.19
11/18/2003 291 -291 3523.67
11/19/2003 289 -289 3540.64
11/20/2003 281 -281 3643.18
11/21/2003 296 -296 4259.63
11/22/2003 489 -489 7917.54
11/23/2003 557 -557 9599.53
11/24/2003 0
11/25/2003 309 -309 4077.03
11/26/2003 358 -358 4966.92
11/27/2003 777 -777 16751.3
11/28/2003 0
11/29/2003 454 -454 6755.94
11/30/2003 475 -475 7531.68
ToMls 4214 9969 -5755 74259.57 150675.1
dsg
Difference +/-
3652.2
-8869.53
2873.39
-375.54
-377.02
414.48
2133,58
1358.2
-9431.61
3526.73
250.31
627.21
76.31
4209.2
1488.3
-9149.85
3745.19
-3523.67
-3540.64
-3643.18
-4259.63
-7917.54
-9599.53
0
-4077.03
-4966.92
-16751.3
0
-6755.94
-7531,68
-76415.51
-4514-