1995-03-14 AGENDA
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995, 7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 28, 1995
REGULAR MEETING
~ LANCE B. ANDERSON, 5220 LYNWOOD BLVD.,
P/LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 2, & P/LOTS 3 & 4, BLOCK 1,
REARR. BLOCK 10, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO
LAKESIDE PARK, PID #13-117-24 31 0070.
RF_~UF3T: VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A PORCH
RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
#277 AND OTHERS IN AN EFFORT TO STUDY THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE WESTONKA AREA AND
ASSIST IN FUNDING A COMMUNITY SURVEY NOT TO EXCEED
$1500.
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL PERMITS FOR PRIVATE
STRUCTURES ON PUBLIC LAND KNOWN AS STRATFORD
LANE. "BATCH #4" DOCK SITES 32670, 33407,
33487, 33525.
APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST FOR 1994
LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - RICE
LAKE CONTRACTING - $26,501.30.
PG. 778-785
PG. 786-789
PG. 790-791
PG. 792-807
PG. 808-809
776
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
~r PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE MODIFICATION
OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
OPERATION OF AN ADDITIONAL MINOR AUTO
REPAIR BUSINESS KNOWN AS GLASS PLUS AT
5533 SHORELINE DRIVE (ARCO AUTO & MARINE)
LOCATED IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.
(SUGGESTED DATE - APRIL 11, 19953 PG. 810
p_!_l_l~: POSSIBLE MORATORIUM ON THE ADOPTION
OF ANY NEW POLICIES OR PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE
cOMMONS OR DOCK PROGRAM. PG. 811-890
POSTPONEMENT OF DISCUSSION RE: PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS ON
SHORELINE DRIVE (HOUSE OF MOY) AND COMMERCE BLVD.
(POND ARENA). PG. 891
(SUGGESTED DATE: APRIL 25, 19953
SET BID OPENING FOR 1995 SEAL COAT PROJECT.
(SUGGESTED DATE: APRIL 13, 1995, lhOO A.M.) PG. 892
APPROVAL MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES & PERMITS PG. 893
PG. 894-911
PAYMENT OF BILLS.
iNFORMATIONAL/MISCEI-LANEOUS.
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for February 1995.
PG. 912-939
LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for
February 1995.
C. LMCD Mailings.
PG. 940-941
PG. 942-962
Letter from Shirley Hills Primary School
RE: School of Excellence Celebration, Wednesday,
May 24, 1995, at Mound Westonka High School.
Invitation indicates that School Officials
would like Mayor Polston to attend the picnic
and speak at the program to follow.
PG. 963
Information RE: 1995 League of Minnesota Cities
(LMC) Annual Legislative Conference in St. Paul,
Thursday, March 30, 1995. Please contact Fran,
ASAP, if you wish to attend.
PG. 964-965
777
Februa~ 25, ~995
Mound City Council
~TES - MOUND CITY cOUNCIL - FEBRUARY 28, 1995
The City Council of Mound, I-Ietmepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday,
Februar~J 28, 1995, in the Council Chambers at 5341 MaYW°°d Road, in said City.
~ ' *.-,- Polston, CounCilmembers~ Andrea Ahrens, and Mark Hanus.
Those present were: Mayor t~uu_. .... ,A~o,[,, were absent and excused. Also present were:
3ensen and pnyms J~"" Liquor Store Manager 3oel
Gino BusinarO, Building Official
Councilmember Liz ~ity Clerk Fran Clark,
City Manager Edward I. Shulde, lt.', and the folio;lng interested citizens:
Acting Police Chief lohn McKinley, Finance Director Kiki Sonnen,
Chuck Hilbelink,
Ion Sutherland, City Attorney Curt Pearson, Lance B. Anderson,
Bernice Putt, Cathy Bailey, Bill Pinegar, Dave Lanz, Meyer, Mary Goode,
Dotty O'Brien, E1ta Erickson, Otvella Hanson,' susan Wilkens, Peter
Diane Maloney, Dan & sandi Strot, Mary & Bernie Malcheski, Charlie Warner, Larry ShaW,
Larry peterson, Dave Laube, and the following Camp Fire girls, boys Sd leaders: Dorian
Thompso.n, Vick'y Seymour, Kevin Seymour, loey Thorson, Casey .Kelly, Patricia Koerner,
Emily Berger, Amiee Berger, and Carol Kelly.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance'
The Camp Fire girls and boys lead the pledge of Allegiance.' '
Representative Steve Smith addressed the Council regarding GOVernor Carlson' s budget message.
MOTION made by ItanuS, seconded'bY Ahreus to approve the Minutes of the
February 14; 1995, Regular Meeting, and the February 21, 1995, Committee of the
Whole Meeting, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
13-
1.1 P-~~~ . ' -ation nrocla~ming March 13-
~.
The Mayor presented the Camp Fire girls anu
.k in the City of Mound.
Fire Birthday wee · y COlVl~d~
19, 1995, Camp _ ,,,ne iji~BAN ItENN?PIN O T¥
1.2
· following organizations for the $'/2,239 that
_ ro Sals from_the_ _~ lock Grant Program.
...... - ~.,aoer presented _the p,.,?o~',.,,,,nit¥ Development B
Rehabilitation of private Property 25,500
Westonka Senior Center - Operations 9,000
Westonka Community Action Network (WECAlq)
Mound C~ty Council
Westonka Intervention . l%bruary 28, 1995
Community Action for Suburban ttennepin (CA 5,700
~T~,_e .Mayor opened the ~-~,' - ~ St-I) 2,500
· puuJ~c tlearin
~narl~e Warner (CAS~a~ ,~ g. The followi
center ',~, :~ue Wilkens "~ persons spoke- · ·
), Dave Lanze (Westonka ~.,,~_ ..(West°nka l~/des, Cam ' ~i SOnnen (WECAN),
--Lcrvent~on). ) Y Barley (Westonka Senior
The Mayor closed the public heari'ng.
I'Ianus moved and Polston Seconded the following resolution:
~-so~,trr~oN ~s.23 .~V-.SOLV~'1ON
Ge, a_~r cou~r~
The vote was unanimously in favor..Motion carried. PROGRAM
1.3 p L!C ~ A E ~S.06: LA
~o_.sa~ co~Meo ~c
NCE F R ~ L. AL_LE . _ ~117-24 43 014 ·
The Building Official expla/ned the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval
The Mayor opened the public hearing..
Dave Laube, 2391 Fairview Lane, as/ed
be manufacturing or assembl i · about the hours of Operation and whether there would
the two busines ~o,~.~ .,~ Y n either busines
Monday'thru ses ,,,~a mey would have no s. Larry Shaw and Larry Peterson, OWners of
rmal office hours 7 or 8 A.M. to 4:30 or 5 P.M.,
Friday. There may be Oeeasiona/1/2 day on Saturday. They further stated there
would be no manufacturing or assembly on site.
The Mayor ~losed the public hearing.
Ahrens moved and/-/anus Seconded the following resolution:
e-~soctrr~oN ~s-2,~ ~w~s°~'unoN ~o A~'~'~OVe CO~rnoNA~, USe
~'~r ~o A
THE B-1 .CENTRAL
FOR COMPONENT BUSINEss zONiNG DISTRICT
SYSTEMS, INC. (CS) & LEEDS
ELECTRONICS, 1NC., AT 5200 MAYWOOD ROAD,
LOTS ~a & ~?, ~LOcK 2, SHn~LE¥
Mound City Council
February 28, 1995
PID//13-117-24 43 0145, P & Z CASE//95-06
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.4 Ahrens moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//95-25
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
RECOGI~ZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING
SETBACK AND NONCONFORMING IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE COVERAGE TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING COVERED
ENTRANCE AT 5200 MAYWOOD ROAD, LOTS 16 &
17, BLOCK 2, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT F, PID//13-117-
24 43 0145, P & Z CASE//95-06
The vote was unanimously in favor.
1.5
Motion carried.
CASE//95-03: DANIEL C. STROT, 1466 EAG!.E LANE, LOTS 3, 4 & 5, BLOCK
2, WOODLAND POINT, PID//12-117,24 43 0002, VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT
A DETACHED GARAGE
The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
Hanus moved and Ahrens seconded-th~ following resolution:
RESOLUTION//95-26
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING
SETBACKS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
CONFORMING DETACHED GARAGE AND DECK
AT 1566 EAGLE LANE, LOTS 3, 4,'AND 5, BLOCK
2, WOODLAND POINT, PID//12-117-24 43 0002, P &
Z CASE//95-03
The vote was unanimously in favor.
1.6
Motion. carried.
CASE//95-04: LANCE B. ANDERSON, 5220 LYNWOOD BLVD., P/LOTS 1 &
2, BLOCK 2, & p/LOTS 3 & 4. BLOCK 1, REARR. BLOCK 10, ABRAHAM
LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKF~$IDE PARK, PID //13-117-24 31 0070~
VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A PORCH
The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended denial on
a 5-1 vote at its February 13, 1995, Meeting. He further explained that since the Planning
Commission Meeting, the applicant has modified the proposal decreasing the size of the porch
2 feet so the 5 'foot variahce to the lake setback will only be 3 feet. He has also agreed to plant
Mound City Council
February 28, 1995
some trees for screening the area from the lake.
The Council discussed the screening requirement and decided there is enough screening existing.
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Polston to direct staff to prepare a
resolution approving Case g95-04, a variance to construct a porch as revised and
presented tonight, deleting the requirement for extra plant screening on the lake side
of the property. This resolution to 'be brought back to the next regular meeting for
formal approval. The vote was unanimohsly in favor. Motion carried.
1.7
VARIAN ET N TR CTADECK · '
The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
Ahrens moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION g95-27
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING
DETACHED GARAGE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION
OF A CONFORMING DECK AT 5001 SPARROW
ROAD, LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 & THE NORTH 11 FEET OF
LOT 5, AND LOT 9, BLOCK 2, LINDEN HEIGHTS
ADDITION, PID//13-117-24 13 0027, P & Z CASE//95-
O5
The vote was unanimously in favtr. Motion carried.
1.8 P ENTATI N OF 1994 DEp_AARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPORTS
The following Department Heads presented their 1994 annual reports to the City Council: Joel
Krumm, Liquor Store Manager; John Mc Kinley, Acting Police Chief; Gino Businaro, Finance
Director; and Jon Sutherland, Building Official.
CO~MMF_,NT AND. G TI N FROM ITIZENS PRESENT
There were none.
1.9 BID AWARD-VA ALL-P LI W RK MENT
The City Manager explained that one bid was received on this equipment. Mayor Polston and
Councilmember Hanus asked if it would be feasible to contract oUt for the cleaning of the sewers
and the catch basins. The City Manager submitted a report from the Public Works
February 28, 1995
Mound City Council
Superintendent which gave a comparison of owning the equipment versus contracting showing
that contracting the work out did not appear to be cheaper. The other factor that would be a
problem if the work was contracted out would be emergency situations.
Ahrens moved Hanus seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//95-28 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE BID FOR THE
VACALL TO ABM EQUIPMENT OF HOPKINS, IN
THE .AMOUNT OF $111,771,75
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion ~arfied.
1.10 GG TED DATE: WEDNF_~DAY MARCH 29 1995 -!1 AM
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Hanus to set March 29, 1995, at 11:00
A.M. as the bid opening .for a 1995 fare truck, triple combination pumper, 1250
gallon per minute, hosebody, booster tank, and all other appurtenances, as specified.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.11 RES_OLUTI N TO SUPPoRT INI)EPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT//277 AND
OTHERS IN AN EFFORT TO STUI)Y THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
co~TY CENTER FOR THE WESTONKA AREA AND ASSIST IN
~ .SURVEY NOT TO EXCEED 1500
The City Manager explained that at the COW Meeting last Tuesday Mike Looby, Director
Community Education Services, and Bert Haglund, an architect with TIP/EOS Architects, were
present to discuss the findings and recommendations of the Westonka Community Center Task
Force regarding the existing community center. The charge for the Task Force was to look at
the feasibility of spending the amount of money ($1.9 million) allocated from the 1993 school
district bond referendum on required code upgrades, necessary maintenance, and desired
building modifications to meet school district and community needs. The Task Force came up
with a number of options and one of thOSe was to have the cities in the school district take a
look at constructing a new community center that would be recreation oriented. It would serve
the entire Westonka area for the existing types 'of uses that are in the building now and adding
other types of uses from a recreational standpoint. The Task Force recommended that the school
district and the cities involved conduct a statistically a~curate survey done by a professional
research firm, Decision Resources, Ltd. This firm would contact residents within the cities and
school district at random, by phone, about their ifiterest in a new community center to replace
what is there and get their ideas on what would be appropriate uses for that kind of facility. The
cost of this survey would be $6,000 and that would be shared by the school district and the cities
involved. They are asking for $1500 from Mound for funding this survey. Input for the survey
would cOme from all the entities.
Mound City Council
' February 28, 1995
The other option was to spend a little more money than. the $1.9 million on the existing building
and do some remodeling and some changing to aacommodate what is already there.
The only action tonight would be to authorize spending up to $1500 to assist in the funding for
this community survey to be conducted by a professional research company.
The Mayor asked if there were comments on this.
Mary Goode, Park Commissioner, stated that Mound is below the national average on facilities
for our youth. She stated this information was obtained by a survey from a task force that she
was involved with. She encouraged the Council to move forward with the survey.
Councilmember Hanus stated that he was very con. cerned about this survey because it can be
made to come out whatever way they want it to. He stated that he did not think that at this time
the public would.support th~ amount of funds that would be required for this project. He further
stated that at the COW Meeting, Councilmember J'ensen was one of the strongest commenters
on this survey, i.e. how it.is constructed and having input on what the questions are. He stated
he feels the survey needs to be painfully honest by showing the up side of what a wonderful
facility this could be but it also needs to show the down side of how this facility will be paid for.
He stated that this is why the City needs heavy input into the questions on the survey.
Councilmember Hanus suggested that this be tabled to the next meeting when Councilmember
Jensen will be here because she had Some specific ideas regarding some of the input into the
survey.
The City Manager pointed out that approving this funding tonight would only mean that you are
going forward with the survey. This approval would not inhibit the input the Council wants to
have into the survey.
The Mayor stated that even if the survey came back positive, he would not be in favor of
committing $13 million with several other cities without a public referendum. Councilmember
Hanus agreed.
Bill Pinegar, District #277 School Board Member, addressed the Council regarding what
information Decision Resources may gather, i.el if the public supported the concept, how much
are they willing to spend, etc. They do h very thorough job in assessing the survey results. He
stated this is an oPportunity for the School District and the various cities to work together on
a project. It doesn't mean we will complete it but it means if we work together we may learn
some things about each other and the community. He admitted that he did not know if the
public would support this either. He stated this survey, if done right, would indicate if this
community would like to have something like a communit center d
Council that Decision Reso ,-. ..... :,, ,_. ...... Y escribed. He reassured the
urceo ~,m ,,sren to me Uouncil's concerns and is looking for input
on what needs to be asked. He agreed that the survey needs to be specific so that people
understand and are not sold something.
February 28, 1995
Mound City Council
Councilmember Ahrens asked Mr. Pinegar, "The first survey that this company did, the one on
the building, was that the survey that erided up with the $1.9 million for Ulxlate to the building?"
Mr. Pinegar repli~xt, "The project is long and drawn out, there was the design phase which came
up with all the various projects that could be included, then which one out of all those projects
did the community agree with and how much money were they willing to spend in total. So yes,
those were all included as part of that survey process." Councilmember Ahrens then stated,
"Now I'm potentially voting to spend $1500, agreed it is not a lot of money, to do a survey to
say - "Maybe you didn't know yot/said the first time a3ound ,' maybe you didn't understand what
you were doing the first time around, when you said that this community, i.e. Westonka, should
spend $1.9 million to (rejuvenate) bring that building up to certain codes."
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Ahrens to table this item to the next
.meeting, March 14, 1995, when we can have more Council input. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Councilmember Hanus suggested that the Council needs to come up with some guidelines as to
what types of questions they feel might be important and determining how much input they will
have on getting their questions into the survey.
1.12
1.13
pAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Hanus, .seconded by Polston to authorize the payment of bills as
presented on the pre-list in the amount of $118,457.77, when funds are available.
A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
ADD-ON - BASS TOUR~AMENT - MOUNL)~ BAY PARK - WEIGH-IN ONLY
MOTION made by Poiston, seconded by Ahrens .to approve a request by the Rick
& Sue Culver, 5548 Spruce Road, (for I * N * Bass Te~m Tournaments) to use
Mound Bay Park on Saturday, June 11, 1995, for a weigh-in only for their fishing
tournament. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
A. Financial Report for January 1995, as' prepared by Gino Businaro, Finance Director.
B. Minutes of the Planning Commission February 13, 1995.
Ce
LMCD Mailings.
parks and Open Space Commission Minutes - February 9, 1995.
Notice from Hennepin County re: A regional county mixed municipal solid waste
hauler licensing program.
Mound City Council
February 28, 1995
F. Letter from Governor Arne Carlson on his supplemental budget message.
G. Notice of the 1995 LMC Legislative Conference in St. Paul, Thursday, March 30, 1995,
at the Radisson St. Paul Hotel. Please let Fran know before March 15, 1995, if you
wish to attend.
H. Mr. & Mrs. Rodney Beystrom, were present asking about when the Public Lands Permits
would be coming before the Council. The City Manager explained that those would be
before the Council on March 14, 1995. Councilmember Hanus stated that at the COW
Meeting last week the Council discussed putting a moratorium on actions regarding the
public lands permits and on further ordinances and rules pertaining to those until they can
be discussed further. Discussions on these policies are not completed and they are being
continued until March 14, 1995. Mr. Beystrom explained that at the Park Meeting they
reluctantly went along with their recommendation, but have changed their minds since
and do not agree with the recommendation.
MOTION msde by Hanus, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at 9:45 P.M. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Attest: City Clerk
Edward j. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
PROPOSED RESOLUTION #95-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SETBACK VARIANCES
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A PORCH
AT 5220 LYNWOOD BLVD.
THAT PART OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2, AND
LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, REARRANGEMENT OF BLOCK 10,
ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK,
PID #13-117-24 31 0070, P&Z CASE #95-04
WHEREAS, the owner, Lance Anderson, has applied for variances as listed
below:
EXISTING/PROPOSED REQUIRED VARIANCE
ST. FRONTAGE 0' L~. ~'~/6~
FRONT 15' +/- 20' 5' +/-
LAKE (W) 39' 50' 11'
LAKE (S) 47' 50' 3'
WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking variance approval to construct a 10'/12'
x 20' porch in the location of an existing 10' x 10' lakeside deck. The deck is to be
moved around to the east side in a conforming location, and;
WHEREAS, this property was granted a variance, Resolution #86-173, to
construct the existing dwelling that recognized the hardship of the inadequate street
frontage, and;
VVH,EREAS~, th~l~.o__r..~.h~'iTl-fin-~'~n the same setbacks
and;
WHEREAS, existing and proposed hardcover appears to be conforming, and;
WHEREAS, this property is located in the R-2 Zoning District which requires
a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet, lot frontage of 40 feet on an improved public
street, a front yard setback of 20 feet to the south, a 10 foot side yard setback to the
east, and a 50 foot setback to the lake, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended denial, however, the
applicant had since modified his request by reducing the size of the porch
Proposed Resolution
95-04 - Anderson
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
The City does hereby~a'recogniz-~ the existing nonconforming setbacks, as
follows:
EXISTING/PROPOSED REQUIRED VARIANCE
ST. FRONTAGE 0, ~ -60' bl. 0/~),
FRONT 15' +/- 20' 5' +/-
LAKE (W) 39' 50' 11'
LAKE (S) 47' 50' 3'
The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section
350:420, Subdivision 8 of the Zoning Ordinance with the clear and express
understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to
all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420.
It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by
the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the
property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land:
Construction of a 10'/12' x 20' porch and relocation the
existing 10' x 10' deck,
This variance is granted for the following legally described property:
That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, and Lots 3 and 4, Block
1, and of vacated Laurel Street, and of the vacated Alley as
platted between Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 12 of said Block 1,
Rearrangement of Block 10, Abraham Lincoln Addition to
Lakeside Park, described as follows: Beginning at the point
of intersection of the Northwesterly line of said Lot 2, Block
2, with a line drawn parallel with and 75 feet North of the
North line of Lot 4 of said Block 2, as measured at right
angles to said North line; thence running Northeasterly
along the Northwesterly line of said Lots 2 and 1, Block 2,
to the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence running
Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1,
Proposed £eso/ution
95-04 - Anderson
Page 3
Block 2, and its extension thereof to the most Northerly
corner of said Lot 3, Block 1; thence continuing
Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 3,
Block 1, to a point which is 82.5 feet Southeasterly from
the most Northerly corner of said Lot 1, Block 2 as
measured along the Northeasterly lines of said Lot 1, Block
2 and Lot 3, Block 1; thence running Southwesterly 106
feet more or less to a point in a line drawn parallel with and
75 feet North of the North line of Lot 4, Block 2, extended,
as measured at right angles to said North line, said point
also being 15 feet East as measured at right angles from
the East line of Laurel Street; thence running West parallel
with the North line of said Lot 4, Block 2 to the point of
beginning.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of
Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section
462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this
property may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with
Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for
the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been
filed with the City Clerk.
Certificate of Survey
for Lance Anderson
in Blocks 1 and 2
Rearrangement of Block 10, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park
Itennepin County, Minnesota
i'.,r~ga I Description
That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, and Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, a~d of vacated Laurel Street, a~d
of the vacated Alley as platted between Lots 1,2,3,4 and 12 of said Block I, Rearramgcment of
Block 10, Abraham Lincoln Addition to lakeside Park, described as follows: Beginning at the point
of intersection of the Northwesterly line of .~aid Lot 2, Block 2, with a line drawn ~arallel with
and 75 feet Norl~h o£ the North line of Lot 4 of .~aid Block 2, as m~asured at right angles to said
North line; thence runnin9 Noz-theasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lots 2 and !, Block
2 , to the most Northerly co~ner of said ]~t 1; thence running Southeasterly along tl~. Northca.~t-
erly line of said Lot 1, Block 2, and its extension thereof to the most Northerly corner o£ said
Lot 3, Block $; thence continuing Southeasterly along the Northeasterly line of said Lot 3, Block
l, to a point which is 82.5 feet So~lth~aster]y from the mo~t Northe. r]y
Block 2, as ~eas~red along the Northeasterly lines of said
thence running Southwesterly 106 feet more or less to a point in a line drawn parallel with and
75 feet North of the North line of Lot 4, Block 2, extended, as m~a.~ured at right angles to said
North line, said point also being 15 feet East as measurod at right a~gles fr~m the East line of
Laurel Streetl thel%ce r~nning West parallel with the North line. of said Lot 4, Block 2, to the
point of ~gi~i.~.
This s~c~ shows the location of an existing house and d~ks and i,rol~ed additions tberc~)n.
It does not [xk~port to show any other improvc~x~nts or
o: iro~ m~rker found
Healthy Cornm uni fy...Healthy You th
.... Let's make it happen...
February 23, 1995-Search Institute Task Force Community Meeting
Community members present: Craig Anderson, Val Anderson, Scott Bjorlin, Karen Brickley,
Sue Cathers, Dwight Davis, Stephanie Davis, Loren Davis, Chrissy Farley, Wendy Goldring, Mary Goode, Brian
Hacklander, Margaret Holste, Julie LaVere, John McKinley, Lyndon Nygaard, Carol Olson, Tim Peipkom,
Bill Pinegar, Brian Powers, Laura Spott, Jeanne Stortz, Jason Swensen, Susan Wilkens, Sandy Wing, Gene Zulk
Update-What has happened since last meeting? .Article in Laker on Survey Results
-Dr. Peter Benson reported to our community- Aprex 100+ people
· Article in paper shared about Chaska and the 8 values that community members created.
Westonka in 2005:
a healthy, youth-supporting community. What does this community
look like in 10 years? These comments are based on the 30 assets that kids need to be
successful and a review of the Search Institute Survey taken by 6-12 graders in the Spring1994
1. Youth has 26 assets
2. Intergenerational Community
3. Community has shared values
4. Place for youth and adults that is welcoming, safe, adult supervised
5. Chemically-free environment
6. Youth is an integral part of community and involved in community. Youth
representative on all policy making boards.
7. Park commission-extended bike path to Lost Lake, ice rink
8. Community Center-ice rink, pool, craft areas
9. Adults and senior volunteers included in after school activities
10. No "No Loitering" signs
11. Collaboration with many organizations and services
12. Conflict resolution without violence
13. Youth feel welcome wherever they go
14. Healthy Youth and adults in community
15. A "Model" to other communities!
16. Pride in our community and in Westonka Schools
17. Volunteer voucher for youth (and adults)
18. Community youth service is part of schools and community at all levels
19. "Living History" of our area- highlight burial mounds in our community-
mounds in public places, identifying markers throughout community. Youth and Seniors working
cooperatively
20. Create Neighborhood service group organizations
21. Transportation throughout our community
Activity buses-grants?, business sponsors?
School buses-used publicly?, ridership fee?
(Cost $3500 a yr. for bus after school )
"Westonka Rides" has 2 vehicles, SojournBus?
22. Things to do after school so kids not home alone
23. Chore services-adopt a grandparent for youth
24. Seniors and adults need to greet youth-start with a "hello"
Page 2
Search Institute Task Force Meeting
February 23, 1995 2:00PM Mound City Hall
What would we like in our community?
1. Pro-social attitude important in youth
2. Sense of community
3. Children need 4-5 adults in their life other than their relatives
4. Parent resource center
5. Safe community
What next?
1. Review resources in community
2. Need more "Senior Representatives" in group
3. Personally invite more-youth, seniors and financial supporters, also our
community consists of the "Westonka" area not just Mound.
4. Walking tour of old High School to see the poor state of the building
5. $1.9 million is available to either refurbish or could be spent on something else?
6. Youth could canvas the community, campaign?
7. Laker-highlight meeting
8. What are volunteer positions in community
9. Night meeting so more youth and adults can attend
10. Scotty B's-willing to print information on place mats!
What are areas we would like to concentrate on as a community
according to the results of the Search Institute Survey'~ 1. Activities after school '
-includes safe places, public spaces, transportation, organized and non-
organized activities
2. Youth (and adult?) Service opportunities in the community
3. Create community resource book (in Community Ed. catalog'~
For next meeting: March 28, 1995,Tuesday at 7:00PM . or?)
· at the Depot by Mound Bay Park
Remember our outh 0-18 years old__ 4000'+ children in our are f~
1. '" a..
Invite and bring someone to the next meeting!
2. Start inventory of community resources
3. Bring samples of all publications in community-where we can
communicate and tell our story...
4. Scotty B's offered-outdoor sign-intersection or Shoreline and Commerce-advertising next meeting
5. Collaborative Ideas to create activities for our youth!
6. How can we share resources and accomplish our task?
Attendance: Dec. Meeting: 8, Jan Meeting: 20+, February Meeting: 26
Community Members at prior meetings: Sharon McMenamy Cook, Katie Dzik, Brenda Geftre, Jan DeMatteo, Justin
Morris, Amber Opdahl, John Rogers, Ken Romness M.D., Ann Savage, Carol Shukle, Ed Shukle. Lenny Spott,
Todd Truax
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT #277 AND OTHERS IN AN EFFORT TO
STUDY THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW
COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE WESTONKA AREA
AND ASSIST IN FUNDING A COMMUNITY SURVEY
NOT TO EXCEED $1500
WHEREAS, the City of Mound has participated in a task force to
determine the best use of the Westonka Community Center and the wisest
expenditure of funds to provide for the required code upgrades, necessary
maintenance and desired building modifications to meet school district and community
needs; and
WHEREAS, the task force has recommended to the Westonka School
District Board of Education the following: "The best use of the Westonka Community
Center is the existing use plus additional uses that would add income in excess of
associated operating costs. The best use of available funds is to combine it with
funds from others to do option number '1'. If there is not significant interest and
support by others to pursue option '1' then pursue option '2'."; and
WHEREAS, option ' 1' is to demolish the existing Westonka Community
Center Building and construct a new community center building with the existing Pond
Arena to remain and to be incorporated into the community center facility; and
WHEREAS'-~ facility _wou~l serve both the existing and new programs
with the following types of uses: Reception, School District Offices, Community
Education, Special Education, Alternative School, Youth Center, Day Care, Senior
Center, Pool with slide, Fitness center, Racquetball courts, Gymnasium, Locker rooms,
Family locker rooms, Multi-purpose room, Kitchen, Meeting rooms, Concessions and
Ice arena; and
WHEREAS, the Westonka School District Board of Education has
approved the recommendation as stated above from the task force and is now
soliciting support and financial assistance for a community survey.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the City of Mound supports Independent School District #277 and
others in their effort to study the construction of a new community center for the
Westonka area and agrees to allocate financial resources to help fund a community
survey in an amount not to exceed $1500.
7?0
MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - FEBRUARY 21, 1995
City Manager Ed Shukle introduced Mike Looby and Bert Haglund to discuss the
findings and recommendations of the Westonka Community Center Task Force
regarding the existing community center. Looby presented the concept of a new
community center that would replace the existing community center. He indicated
that the school board had established a task force: "The purpose of this committee
shall be to determine the best use of the Westonka Community Center and the wisest
expenditure of funds to provide for the required code upgrades, necessary
maintenance and desired building modifications to meet school district and community
needs." The task force was made up of persons representing the school district, the
Hockey Association, cities of Mound and Minnetrista, the Westonka Senior Center,
Westonka Community Action Network and other interested citizens. The task force
reviewed and evaluated the existing community center and came up with different
options that could be pursued. Upon review of these options, the task force
recommended an option which included the demolition of the entire Westonka
Community Center Building and the construction of a new community center building
at the existing site. The existing Pond Arena would remain and be incorporated into
a new community center facility. The facility would serve both the existing and new
programs with a number of uses that were recreationally oriented. This option was
reviewed by the school district board in early January of this year, and the school
board's direction was to conduct a community survey which would determine the
public support within the school district and area cities for such a community center
facility. Should the survey indicate that there is little interest and support in such a
facility, then the next option to be pursued would be to demolish a portion of the
existing 1939 building and implement fire safety accessibility and maintenance
improvements in the remainder of the existing building. It would also require
remodeling to relocate existing programs from the 1939 building. It was emphasized
by Looby and Haglund of TSP/EOS Architecture that the task force had evaluated the
facility that currently exists and whether the $1.9 million ought to be spent on
bringing this building up to fire safety and accessibility codes. The task force, by an
11 to 1 vote recommended that this was not a realistic option to pursue. Hence, the
new community center option became the number one option with the demolition of
a portion of the existing 1939 building becoming a second option. Looby emphasized
the need for a community survey and asked the City Council to spend up to $1500
for participation in the community survey. The City Council expressed an interest in
developing the survey with the task force and others working with Decision
Resources, Inc. Ltd., who is the professional research firm that would do the actual
survey. Also discussed were financing options with regard to option number one.
The City Council indicated that they would like to tour the existing facility and
arrangements were going to be made with Mr. Looby with regard to taking tours of
the facility prior to the next regular council meeting. This item will appear on the
February 28, 1995 agenda as a request from the task force to have the City Council
agree to spend up to $1500 to participate in the community survey.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION//95-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE
SPECIAL PERMITS FOR PRIVATE STRUCTURE ON PUBLIC LAND
KNOWN AS STRATFORD LANE
"BATCH #4"
DOCK SITES #32670, 33407, 33487, 33525
WHEREAS, The City of Mound is updating the permits for structures located on public
lands, and;
WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a four-fifths vote
for Construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the
natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, and;
WHEREAS, "Batch #4" details the private encroachments located at dock sites 32670,
33407, 33487, and 33525, and these encroachments have been inspected by the Building Official
and Dock Inspector according to the Procedure Manual, and;
WHEREAS, the Park and Open Space Commission reviewed this request and
recommended approval, with conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. To approve Public Land Permits for "Batch #4" as follows:
Unless otherwise noted in the "Comments/Recommendation" column on the
attached "Batch #Y', permits shall be approved according to (14) on the Decision
Flow Chart, "Grant Permit up to 5 Years."
b. The permits will expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval.
c. The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
do
All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by
a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the State
Electrical Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed
installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location
of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting
property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City
Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff.
77 .
Proposed Resolution, Batch #4
February 28, 1995
Page 2
DOCK SITE
32670
Batch #4
Public Land Permits
Park and Open Space Commission 2-9-95
ABUTTING ADDRESS
4594 DENBIGH ROAD
KEVIN RUDEK
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS D
ENCROACHMENT
- STORAGE SHED
WITH ELECTRIC
LIGHT ATTACHED
TO IT.
COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
SHED AND LIGHT HAVE ALREADY BEEN REMOVED.
REMOVE FOUNDATION BY JUNE 30, 1995.
DOCK SITE
33407
ABUTTING ADDRESS
4466 DENBIGH ROAD
RODNEY BEYSTROM
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS A
ENCROACHMENT
~ ELECTRIC LIGHT
- OUTLET
COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
REMOVE OR RELOCATE LIGHT ONTO PRIVATE
PROPERTY.
APPROVE OUTLET - VERIFY STATE ELECTRICAL
INSPECTION COMPLETED.
DOCK SITE
33487
33525
ABUTTING ADDRESS
4452 DENBIGH ROAD
JACK COOK
4446 DENBIGH ROAD
MARK HANUS
~TRATFORD LANE, CLASS C
ENCROACHMENT
- RETAINING WALL
- BOAT RAMP WITH
ELECTRIC MOTOR-
- CLOTHESLINE
POLE
COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
REMOVE RETAINING WALL AND BOAT RAMP FROM
PUBLIC LAND BY JUNE 30, 1995, AS AGREED BETWEEN
THE PARKS DIRECTOR AND JACK COOK.
REMOVE CLOTHESLINE POLE FROM PUBLIC LAND AT
CITY'S EXPENSE.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
and
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
m
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 9, 1995
PUBLIC LAND PERMITS: BATCH #4
City staff is in the process of updating permits for encroachments on public lands as
directed by the City Council. Special permits are required for private structures
located on public lands as specified in City Code Section 320.
"Batch #4" details the private encroachments located at dock sites 32670, 33407,
33487, and 33525. These encroachments have been inspected by the Building
Official and Dock Inspector according to the Procedure Manual.
Staff recommended approval of Public Land Permits for "Batch #4", as follows:
Unless otherwise noted in the "Comments/Recommendation" column on the
attached "Batch #4", permits shall be approved according to (14) on the
Decision Flow Chart, "Grant Permit up to 5 Years."
2. The permits will expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval.
3. The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
..
All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by
a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the
State Electrical Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed
installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location
of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting
property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City
Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff.
Batch #4
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS D
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
32670 4594 DENBIGH ROAD - STORAGE SHED REMOVE OR RELOCATE SHED WITH LIGHT. SHED IS
KEVIN RUDEK WITH ELECTRIC DILAPIDATED.
LIGHT A'I-I'ACHED
TO IT.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS A
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
33407 4466 DENBIGH ROAD - ELECTRIC LIGHT REMOVE LIGHT - INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES.
RODNEY BEYSTROM
- OUTLET APPROVE OUTLET - VERIFY STATE ELECTRICAL
INSPECTION COMPLETED.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS C
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION ,,
33487 4462 DENBIGH ROAD - RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL REQUIRES PRIOR WA 1 ~-NSHED
JACK COOK APPROVAL.
- BOAT RAMP WITH REMOVE BOAT RAMP, PORTION ON PUBLIC LANDS.
ELECTRIC MOTOR NOTE SURVEYS.
4446 DENBIGH ROAD - POLE REMOVE/RELOCATE POLE ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
33525 MARK HANUS
3
Park and Open Space Commission Minutes February 9, 1995
A. #32670, KEVIN RUDEK
Staff indicated that the shed and light have been removed, only the shed foundation
remains, and this is expected to be removed. Staff suggested the foundation be
removed by June 30, 1995.
B. #33407, RODNEY BEYSTROM
Mr. Beystrom explained the history of how and why the electrical was installed. He
stated that it was there when he purchased the house, and he converted the existing
services to an outlet and light and had it inspected by the Electrical Inspector at that
time.
Regarding the light, Mr. Beystrom explained that he has reviewed the City's Guidelines
for Lights on Public Shoreland, and he feels a light should be permitted for safety
reasons because he has a very steep hill. The commission discussed the possibility
of moving the light back onto private property. The applicant was agreeable.
MOTION made by Casey, seconded by Steinbring, to recommend
approval of the following Public Land Permits, as recommended by staff:
Dock Site #32670, 4594 Denbigh Road, Kevin Rudek:
Remove or relocate shed and light.
Dock Site #33407, ~.~.~.6 Denbigh Road, Rodney Beystrom:
Remove or relocate light. Approve outlet - verify state
electrical inspection completed.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. #33487, JACK COOK
The Parks Director indicated that half of the subject retaining wall has already been
removed, and that the applicant has agreed to remove the balance of the retaining wall
and the boat ramp.
MOTION made by Goode, seconded by Darling to recommend approval
of staff's recommendation to remove the boat ramp and retaining wall by
June 30, 1995, as agreed between Jack Cook and the Parks Director.
Motion carried unanimously.
D. #33525, MARK HANUS
A letter which was received by the applicant, Mark Hanus, was read out loud by Chair
Schmidt.
4
Park and Open Space Commission Minutes
February 9, I995
"RE: Clothesline poles on city property adjacent to 4446 Denbigh Road
I am unable to attend the Park and Open Space Commission meeting of 9 February
95. I understand you will be discussing the clothesline poles that are near my propertY.
Since I am unable to attend, I just wanted to indicate my position on this issue.
I. It is unknown who installed these, but it is obvious upon
inspection that it was many years ago.
2. I do not use these for any purpose and have no desire to
maintain them.
3. I do not own them and never had an interest in them.
4. I have not been responsible in any way for these poles in
the past. Consequently, I will not assume responsibility
for them in the future. They were there many years
before I moved to Mound.
5. My only connection to these poles is that I moved into the
property next to them and hold a dock site near the poles.
6. if the city wishes, they are most welcome to remove
these poles whenever they desire.
if the city chooses to remove the poles, care must be used. There is a property
iron very near one of the poles. The poles are set in concrete and it is possible that either
the extraction of the pole or the equipment used for this purpose may disturb the location
of the property iron. The location of the property line is critical due to tensions with my
neighbor, if the location of this iron is disturbed by the extraction of the poles, I would
require the city have a registered surveyor relocate it to prevent any future problem. I do
not want a parks employee to reposition it. This would not be legal anyway. To ensure
the proper handling of this matter I would need to have notice as to when the work would
be performed.
Thank you. I hope this explains my position adequately."
The Parks Director explained that if the City agrees to remove the pole, this could set
a precedence for the City to remove other structures in the future, which may be
much larger and more costly to remove. It has been the City's view that the
encroachments are the responsibility of the abutting owner.
Ahrens confirmed that this area was realized to be public land only about 4 years ago,
and that if the City owns the property, they should take care of the encroachment.
Goode thinks the City needs a policy to determine who is responsible for the removal
or maintenance of existing encroachments. Darling agreed.
Ahrens noted that she believes a precedence has already been set to have the City
remove these encroachments; last year the City removed a retaining wall and a
stairway off the commons when the abutting owners refused responsibility.
Fackler explained that abutting owners should assume the responsibility of those
encroachments which were created by them, such as placement of sod or installation
of retaining walls. If the City did not create the encroachment, they should not be
responsible.
5
_Patio and Open Space Commission Minutes
~February 9, 1995
Goode reiterated that Hanus did not know this was public land when he bought the
house, and the pole was existing when he purchased the property, so she feels the
City should be responsible for the removal of the pole.
Casey commented that they do not know who installed the poles, and the City should
be responsible for prior encroachments. There is no evidence that the applicant has
maintained this encroachment, and we did not catch the person who originally
installed the pole. With a prior structure, he does not see how the City can make Mr.
Hanus remove it.
Goode agreed with Casey, and commented that she believes it would be less costly,
in the long run, to have the City remove the encroachments.
Byrnes suggested that the pole be sawed off at the base, and this would not disturb
the property marker.
Darling commented that he agrees with Casey, and he does not feel this issue is any
different than if someone planted a tree in the street, then sold the house, and the
next person has to remove it.
Peter Meyer stated that considering how minor of an encroachment this is, it was not
worth as much time as they have spent discussing it.
MOTION made by Darling, seconded by Goode, to recommend that the
clothesline pole be removed, at the City's expense, from Dock Site
#33525, abutting 4446 Denbigh Road. Motion carried unanimously.
These recommendations will be reviewed by the City Council on February 28, 1995.
CITY OF MOUND
STAFF REPORT
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
DATE:
MEETING
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 3, 1995
February 9, 1995
Park & Open Space Commission
Park and Open Space Commission and Applicant
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Jim Fackler, Parks Director
Tom McCaffrey, Dock Inspector
Update of Public Land Permits - "Batch #4"
Dock Sites #32670- #42586
Background/Comments
City staff is in the process of updating permits for encroachments on public lands as
directed by the City Council. Special permits are required for private structures
located on public lands as specified in City Code Section 320.
Please find attached "Batch #4", this is a listing of dock sites that have private
structures such as stairways, lights, or some other type of encroachment, located on
public lands. These encroachments have been inspected by the Building Official and
Dock Inspector according to the Procedure Manual.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Public Land Permits as listed on the attached
"Batch #4", as follows:
Unless otherwise noted in the "Comments/Recommendation" column on the
attached "Batch //4", permits shall be approved according to (14) on the
Decision Flow Chart, "Grant Permit up to 5 Years."
printed on recycled paper
January 3, 1995
Batch //4
Page 2
The permits will expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval.
The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by
a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the
State Electrical Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed
installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location
of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting
property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City
Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff.
Note: files and photographs are available at City Hall and will be on hand at the
meeting. Please call Jon Sutherland or Jim Fackler if you have any questions. Please
refer to the Flow Chart and Use Plan for discussion.
pJ
enclosure
(The abutting owners and dock site holders have been notified. The recommendation from the Park and
Open Space Commission will be heard by the City Council on February 28, 1995.)
Revised 2/9/95
Batch #4
Public Land Permits
Park and Open Space Commission 2/9/95
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS D i
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
32670 4594 DENBIGH ROAD - STORAGE SHED REMOVE OR RELOCATE SHED WITH LIGHT. SHED IS
KEVIN RUDEK WITH ELECTRIC DILAPIDATED.
LIGHT ATTACHED
TO IT.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS A
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
33407 4466 DENBIGH ROAD - ELECTRIC LIGHT REMOVE LIGHT - INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES.
~ RODNEY BEYSTROM - OUTLET APPROVE OUTLET - VERIFY STATE ELECTRICAL
INSPECTION COMPLETED.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS C
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
33487 4452 DENBIGH ROAD - RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL REQUIRES PRIOR WATERSHED
JACK COOK APPROVAL.
- BOAT RAMP WITH REMOVE BOAT RAMP, PORTION ON PUBLIC LANDS.
ELECTRIC MOTOR NOTE SURVEYS.
33525 4446 DENBIGH ROAD - POLE REMOVE/RELOCATE POLE ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
MARK HANUS
.)
40 40 40 40. 4~-
· ' (9~
Vii ) ~7 18
4~)J ,if') 40 40 4r~
9-11 -23 7.
BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
STREET ADDRESS 4594 DENBIGH ROk~ ESTIMATED VALUE $ X
LOT 7 & 3 BLOCK 3 PID 19-117-23 31 0007
ADDITION AVALON PLAT # 37850
OWNER
KEVIN RUDEK PHONE (W) 571-5555
PHONE (H)
LIC. #
ADDRESS
CONTRACTOR
ADDRESS
PHONE
DESCRIPTION OFWORK DEq~IOLITtON OF SHED AND DOCKS LOCATED ON THE ADJACENT PUBLIC LAND
"STRATFORD LANE"
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS
ZONING DISTRICT
ZONING COMMENTS
PERMIT APPROVAL SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION# __
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON
CORRESPONDING GENERAL PERMIT #
(SAC, DRAINTILE, PLUMBING. MECHANICAL, ETC,)
NOTICE: Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, heating,
ventilation or air conditioning. This permit becomes null and void if work or
construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or if
conslruction or work is suspanded or abandoned for a period of 180 days
at any limo after work is commenced.
I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know
the same to be ~rue and correct. All provisions of laws and city on:linances
governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein
or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to
violate or cancel the provisions DJ' any other state or IocaJ law regulating
conslmction or the performance of construction.
PERMIT FEE (BASE) ................................... $
PLAN CHECK FEE ...................................... $
LESS PAID PLAN CHECK ........................... $ (.
Rece,pt #
INVESTIGATION FEE .................................. $
(UBC Sec~,on (304e)
SURCHARGE .............................................. $
ESCROW DEPOSIT .................................... $
DRAI NTILE ................................................... $
S.A.C. (MWCC) ............................................ $
(78-2304- 99*4, 78-3774 = 1%)
CITY SEWER CONNECTION ..................... $
CITY WATER CONNECTION ...................... $
WATER METER ........................................... $
STATIONARY ROD ...................................... $
OTHER ......................................................... $
TOTAL .......................................................... $
Jpi~ ~U%.HE_~_~ND, BUILDING OF~$CiAL
DATE:
DATE:
01-3251
01-3253
) 01-3253
01-3251
01-2222
01-2300
01-3254
78-2304
78-3158
73-3155
73-3744
73-3842
NoA.
Po~h ~
RECEIVED
OCT 8 1991
Shoreli. ne gocat£on Survey
for Jack Cook
in not 2, Talnck 1, Ava[on ~ Vacated g~ra~ford Lane
Ilonnopin County, Minno~o~
Leaal Description
Lot 2, Block I, Avnlon nc'¢'()rclinq tO tile
recorde~ plat there~,f and ~ituate in
Henna,in County, Mtnn~-~;o~n, nnR that part
Lot 2 as Der Doc. N,,. 11 '~)17.
This Rurv~.y show.~ i.h,. lc~c,l!:ir)n O[ ,~ wood
retaining wall and '~7q.4 onntour in
described property. Tt ~oes not purport
to show any other improvem('nt~ or encroach-
ments.
I .",c~.by ~'rtii'y th.'~ this surv%.y was p~.pa~.d bv m%..r under my did. ct super. I DATE
visk,n, and Ihal I am a duly n..l~isletcd Civil Engineer and Land S~n'eyor under
the laws of thc Slate nf Minm.'~la.
SCALE
MINNEHAHA CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT
14600 Minnetonka Boulevard
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597
office: (612) 939-8320 fax: (612) 939-8244
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR: Ellen B. Sones
BOARD OF MANAGERS: Thomas Ma!~le, Jr., Pres. · C. Woodrow Love · John E~ Thomas
Clarkson Lindley · Thomas W. LaBounty · Martha S. Hartfiel · Pamela G. Blixt
LAKE MINNETONKA
Applicant:
Location:
Purpose:
Dear Mr. Cook:
March 8, 1994
Permit Aoolication NO. 94-31:
Mr. Jack Cook
4452 Denbigh Road
Mound, MN 55364
City of Mound, Tl17, R23, Sec. 19, NE 1/4
Placement of beach sandblanket.
At the regularly scheduled February 24, 1994 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit
application was reviewed along with the following exhibits:
Permit Application 94-31 received February 3, 1994.
Site plan received February 3, 1994.
Typical cross section received February 3, 1994.
Action was taken denying your permit application for the following reason:
Outstanding violation concerning the placement of a timberwall and fill within the floodplain
of Lake Minnetonka on the subject property.
Please note that the matter concerning a violation of the District's floodplain alteration rule would need to
be resolved before the Board of Managers would consider granting any District permits that involve work
on the subject property.
Please note further that a new permit application with exhibits would need to be submitted at this time along
with documentation from the City of Mound which allows for the placement of a sandblanket on public
commons property. The District would also need to verify that the outstanding violation had been resolved.
Sincerely,
Ellen B. Sones
District Administrator
C:
Jim Faclder, City of Mound
Jim Smith, Concept Landscaping
application pending receipt and staff approval of a plan which
provides for compensatory floodplain storage. Upon vote, the
motion carried unanimously.
~94-31, Jack Cook -- Placement of beach sandblanket.
Mr. Syverson reviewed the permit application, noting that
there is an outstanding violation concerning Jack Cook which
involves the placement of a retaining wall and fill within the
floodplain of Lake Minnetonka without a District permit. Mr.
Syverson noted that the District had recently received a letter
from Mr. Cook stating that he will remove the wall and all fill
before June 1st of this year.
Manager Love stated that it was his understanding the
violation concerning the wall and fill was located on city commons
property and suggested that the city of Mound and the District
reach an agreement as to how to proceed before the Managers
consider whether to grant a permit for the placement of the
sandblanket.
It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Blixt, to
deny the permit application due to an outstanding violation
concerning the applicant and request that the applicant contact the
city to resolve the violation and receive approval for the
placement of a sandblanket on city commons property prior to
applying for a sandblanket permit with the District. Upon vote,
the motion carried unanimously.
A~ministrator's Report
Ms. Sones reported that she had attended a meeting at the
Minneapolis Park Board and noted that the Park Board and the City
of Minneapolis would like to focus on a work plan and joint
agreements between the agencies involved. Ms. Sones stated that
Park Board staff will be focusing on how to address the concerns
that were raised by certain individuals from the Linden Hills
neighborhood at a community meeting that focussed on the proposed
Lake Calhoun water quality treatment pond.
Ms. Sones reported that she had met with a Twin Lake's Task
Force group which is composed of property owners that reside within
the Twin Lakes subwatershed and who are concerned about the current
condition of Twin Lake. Ms. Sones noted that she will be meeting
with the group on an ongoing basis.
Ms. Sones stated that the public advisory group for the Long
Lake Improvement project had held their first meeting. Ms. Sones
noted that the group appeared to be very interested in water
quality improvements to the lake and in the overall project.
39!. ~
w· .,
95g, a.
999'
961
RECEIVED
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
2 lg§5
15050 23rd Avenue North, PLymouth, Minnesota 55447-4739
Telephone
612/476-6010
612/476-8532 FAX
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
March 1, 1995
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
City of Mound, Minnesota
1994 Lift Station Improvements
Payment Request No. 5 (FINAL)
MFRA #10555
Dear Ed:
Enclosed is Rice Lake Contracting's Final Payment Request for work
completed through January 31, 1995, on the subject project. The amount
of this payment request is $26,501.30. Because this work is fully
completed, we are recommending that no amount be retained.
We have reviewed the project with Greg Skinner, the City's Public
Works Superintendent, and find that it was completed in general
accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation
that the Contractor be paid in full for this project, per the attached
Final Payment Request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please
contact us.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
JC: pry
Enclosure
m: 10555\shukle2.28
An Equal Opportunity Employer
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
PUBLIC HEARING NO TICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
CASE NO. 95-07
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
THE MODIFICATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF
AN ADDITIONAL MINOR AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS
KNOWN AS GLASS PLUS
AT 5533 SHORELINE DRIVE (ARCO AUTO & MARINE)
LOCATED IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on
Tuesday, April 11, 1995 to consider the modification of a conditional use permit to
allow the operation of an additional "Minor Auto Repair" business for Glass Plus
involving the replacement of glass in automobiles. This new use, in addition to the
existing Arco Auto & Marine, are proposed to operate at 5533 Shoreline Drive, legally
described as: Lot 5 and the Westerly 50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision Number
170.
All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given
the opportunity to be heard at this meeting.
Francene C. Clark, ~;ity Clerk
Mailed to property owners within 350' by March 24, 1995. Published in The Laker on March 20, 1995.
printed on recycled paper
MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - FEBRUARY 21, 1995
Ed Shukle, City Manager, Jim Fackler, Parks Director and Jon Sutherland, Building
Official, reviewed the Public Lands Permit process for structures that are located on
public lands and/or commons. The City Manager explained that over the last two
years the City of Mound has taken an aggressive approach to dealing with
obstructions on public lands. He emphasized that we require permits and that permits
expire and then are up for renewal. In some instances, the City Council has directed
that obstructions be removed from the public lands and/or commons. Fackler
reviewed the various ordinances, City Code and resolutions that have dealt with the
authority and responsibility of the City in administering a Public Lands Permit process.
He also reviewed the structures and encroachments that have been inventoried by
staff on the public lands and discussed the various methods by which the staff
evaluates the structures and encroachments on these public lands. Sutherland also
discussed the application of the Uniform Building Code as it applied to new stairways
being proposed on the public lands. The decision flow chart was also reviewed in
terms of how structures fit within the flow chart and whether they should be allowed
or not allowed. Also discussed were recently approved permits and permits upcoming
to be approved by the Council. The City Manager summarized the City's role and
responsibility with regard to the Public Land Permit process and requested that if there
were to be changes in the way that staff deals with this process, that now is a good
time to look at the process and discuss any changes that might be made.
Councilmember Mark Hanus asked to discuss his proposal with regard to not only the
Public Lands Permit process, but also the overall program of the Commons Docks. He
made two suggestions: 1) Place a moratorium on the adoption of any new policies
or procedures relating to the Commons or Dock programs until the City Council can
determine if it wishes to apply current policies or adopt changes. Also a moratorium
on the current proactive commons inventory activities by staff would be in order until
the Council determines if the current method is desired. 2) Form a task force to
address both programs and make recommendations either to maintain the current
programs or to offer potential changes. The City Council agreed not to go back and
try to change the process that has been in place with regard to previous applications.
However, they did ask that the discussion with regard to a moratorium be placed on
the March 14, 1995 agenda for discussion. In the meantime, any applications that
are currently in process will be dealt with under the existing process. Any applications
that come prior to March 14th will be put on hold until there is a decision with regard
to putting a moratorium on the Public Lands Permit process. With regard to the task
force, the Council agreed that further discussion is necessary and that the Council
discuss this matter at its next Committee of the Whole meeting; specifically, to deal
with the creation of a task force as to membership, staffing, etc., as well as giving a
clear cut direction to such a task force as it pertains to image, useability and use of
the public lands and/or commons.
To: Ed Shukle
From: Mark Hanus RECEIVED .....~
Date: 7 February 1995
Dear Ed,
I request that you add the enclosed proposal to the next COW meeting agenda.
I think it is very important to discuss this at the eadiest opportunity. I am concerned
that any further delay of this discussion could create inconsistencies or potential legal
problems resulting from future decisions unless the council has a clear indication of
which direction it wishes to go. ,
As a courtesy to the other council members, I believe the COW meeting would be the
best forum to discuss this issue the first time.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
PROPOSAL
To:
From:
Mayor and Mound City Council
Mark Hanus - Mound City Councilmember
Re:
Mound City Commons and Mound Dock Programs
It has become apparent that the current City Council may have a new
perspective of the commons and dock programs. In order to avoid legal problems and
inconsistencies in application of the city's policies in the future it would be wise to have
a clear perspective of the direction that the council wishes to go.
Therefore, the following action is offered for council consideration.
1. Place a moratorium on the adoption of any new policies or procedures
relating to the commons or dock programs until the council can determine if it wishes to
apply current policies or adopt changes. Also, a moratorium on the current proactive
commons inventory activities by staff would be in order until the council determines if
the current method is desired.
2. Form a task force at the earliest opportunity to address both programs and
make recommendations either to maintain the current programs as is or offer potential
changes. If changes are found desirable, the task force will offer suggestions that will
make the programs more user fdendly without reducing public ability to use and enjoy
the commons and dock systems. This is intended to reduce future litigation as well as
reduce citizen frustration and confusion that increases with each additional restriction or
addition to the ordinances.
This task force would be composed of Mound citizens that proportionately
represent the users of the programs. For example, most of the task force would be
equally divided between abutting dock owners and inland dock owners with the
remaining members being occasional commons users or general Mound citizens if any
are interested in serving. This is t; ensure equity in representation as it pertains to
whom these policies affect.
Both policies and ordinances that relate to commons and docks must be open
to discussion. The intent of this proposal is to avoid creating any "hands off" areas of
discussion related to these two programs. Due to the deep rooted and intertwined
problems that exist between the ordinances and policies, any "hands off" rules in the
task force charter could stifle the effectiveness of any positive recommendations.
3. In the interim, while these discussions are taking place, existing policies will
remain active with the exception of the above mentioned activities.
This proposal is offered in good faith and intended in the best interest and well
being of the citizens of the City of Mound.
Mark Hanus
Mound Councilmember
REVIEW OF EXISTING
PUBLIC LAND PERMIT PROCEDURES
by: Jon Sutherland, Building Official
and Jim Fackler, Parks Director
Committee of the Whole
February 21, 1995
e
e
HOW IT BEGAN & WHAT WE HAVE: establishment
implementation of the Public Land Permit Process
and
Ordinances:
# 10 - 05/09/50
$ 20 - 05/09/50
$ 94 - 05/12/60
#305 - 05/17/73
#332 - 03/06/75
# 54 - 12/23/91
# 62 - 04/19/93
City Code:
Chapter 26, Part F - 05/12/60 . . .
Chapter 26, Part F - 03/06/75 . . .
Section 320 ............
- Resolutions: #77-130, #77-131, #77-132, #93-52 .
WHAT'S OUT THERE?: Inventory of Structures/Encroachments
on Public Lands .....................
HOW STAFF DETERMINES RECOMMENDATIONS: Guidelines for
Writing Staff Reports .... ~ .............
City Code Section 320, Use Plan, Comprehensive Plan,
and Shoreland Management Ordinance.
Decision Flow Chart ................
Stairways: "Policy for Structures on Public Lands"
(Resolution #93-142) ..............
Electric (also see "Guidelines f~r Lights on Public
Lands," Exhibit P).
Platforms.
Plantings (guidelines are pending City Council
approval) .......
Retaining walls (should~uide~i~sbe estab~i~h~d~).
PERMITS APPROVED: Copies of resolutions for recently
approved Public Land Permits ..............
BATCH ~4: to be heard by the Council on February 28th .
FUTURE PLAN: 1995-96 tentative schedule for updating
Public Land Permits ..................
SUMMARY: by Ed Shukle, city Manager.
Page #
1- 4
5- 8
9 - 12
13 - 15
16 - 22
23
24 - 25
26 - 29
30 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 45
46
47 - 49
50
51
53 - 54
55 - 58
59 - 74
75
519150
.-' 10-I
ORDINA~C~ NO.
AN 9RDIN~%.~'SE PROV-iDiNG Fo,. LiCEPISZNG Ai~!D ~GULA'TiNG AND BOATHOUSES', EOAT ~J,~PS OR SLIPS,
A PENAL~ FOR TIIE VIOLA~ION TZ~EOP
The Village Council of the Vil!a~e of Island Park, Minnemot?.,
ordains:
S~OTXON 1, LiCENS'-".S RE(~UiF. ED, No. doc/c or
aft°= be e~ected, kept or maintained upon, om abuttin~ upon, any pub~
Cquncil of the Vill~g~ of Isled Park and pa)-in~
-therefor in ac6ord~ce with .the terms of th~ with!~ o~dinanc~.
SECTION 2. APPLICATIONS-FO?., Ai?D iSSU.tNCE OF, LXCEi-iSES. Each
~uch applications sh~l contain the full n.~me and ~ddr,~::s of th3
ordinance, and a d~ocripticn of tko location cr p;-c:3c~cd location of
in~ any ~uc~ applic ..... n and u~,on a~:tkerim~ti~n cf ~' ~
oil at any ~uch mooting, ~d pay~nt of a liccnss foe of $1.00 for
each such d~ck or bo~tHcus~ to th~ Vi!!a~e Tro~u~or, ti'~e Villaje
house. No such license shall be authorisad by the Villag~ Co,oil
ten~nco of any much dock or boathouso existinE at the time of the
pas3ags of the within ordlnanco, co:uDlies substantially with the
of tho within ordlnanco ~nd the Villa. ge Council shf!I have approved
the location ~d type cf construction thereof.
'gensus shall ~xpire one y~ar .from the date of-i~su~ thereof, .and'each
such license shall be represented by a metal tag or other
ate device which uhall be affixed in. a prominent pl~ce upon each
such docks or bo~thoume~. The Village Coun~ ~hall, 'by appropriate
reuolutlon therefore, proVide for $h~ preparation and imsuance of
such metal ta~m or d.mvlces am are required by th~ withih
SECTION 4~ LICENSES FOR Do~S A}ID BOAT3~0USES E~STING AT
TIME OF T~ PASSAG~ OF THE WITiiIN' ~IN.~ICE. With respect to docks '
'~d boathouses already erected a~ lhe time of the p~msage of
~i~hin ordi'n~ce, a license '~o continue the mainZ~no, nce ~he~eof
be applied for in' the. m~er h~reinbefore described for the licenmi~
of new docks and'bom~houmes, ~ilhi~ 30 days af:.r ih~ within
lO - 2.
OR~I.~CE NO, l0 (Contin=ed)
'~:~.takes effect as hereinafter provided, and all such appliq~tions sha~l
· .';be'presented tO the Villaae Council and l'icenses issued therefor i~
· ~he sa-,e m .=nner as is herein provided for the licensin~ of the erect.
tion of new docks or boathouses,.
. SDCTIONS, T~%NSFER OF LICENSES. License= i=sued under the
~rm~ of the w!thi~ ordinance s~l be tr~sf~r==ble upo~ ten days'
motice of tr~mfe= of Owne=Ship thereof mailed or delivered to the
Vill'a~ Clerk by eithor 9arty, ~hiuh notice sh=ll contain the full
. n~u =nd' addres~ .of the tr~feree of ~ such license~ provided'
~ha~ ~uch tr~sf~r dues no.t result in the OwnerShi~ 0f more 'th~ one
dock or mo=e than 'one bus,ho=me by such t=~sferee ~d his i~edimte
f~ily a~ prov~ed in the within ord~nance,. -
SECTION 6. BOAT R~U.IPS OR SLIPS. Ea=h license issued pursuit
~o...the within ordinance for the eroc~ion or maint.=n~noe of a boathouse
s~!l ent~l~ the holder thereof to eroot and ~intaln'one boat
..maintain. a. boat r~p or slip %-ho i~ not llcen~d to ~ruut or maintain
ac 'far as may be~acticable.with the totem of the -within ordin~n.ce'
with're~p, ec~ ~o do~ and b~thcumo~,
S'~CTiON' 7o RULES AND RLG'ULATIONS. Subdiv!=ion 1, . The Village
Counci'l ~hail .determine =nd approve the location of each dock, boat~ '
house, boat r~p or z!ip. ~;i'~h'=espec~ to docks e=eot~d or mainta~ed
or pmopomed to bc eroctud o= maintained by o,wners of l~d abutting ~
upon ~y. str~.e~, road or co~on inta=Vcnin~ .betrOth ~:Ach proDerty ~d
~int~inod midway bct~,eun the lnter~ec.~ion~ of ~h~ o~om~t~ side
line~ cf tho pl-o'p~r~y cfi.such app!icm~t, as e~tend~d, wi~h th~ ~hor9
.Village Go~ci! where it a~pears imprac='ic=ble to so Iocate such
dock ~nd Whe=~ it further a~psar~ that ~ny ~uch. dook or proposed do~
uonmtructod e!~e~'here will not interfere ~=emson~bly with .~he use :' ..
C= e~joymunt of ~=id waters of L~e Minnetonl~a by the public o~ o=he~
adjoin!n= 1ct cx~n~rm ~buttinj upon ~y much street or oo~mnon.
~u~diTi~on ~. No mor~ th~ cne dock, boathouse, boat., r=~. or
~lip shall be pcr:nitted for each applicant and his i~:~ediate fuil.y'~'
a licunue by the'Village Cloth for =ore than 'on~ dock, bcatho.~se~
bo~t r~mp or ~li~ for ~y much applicant wh~re .th~ er~ot~on ~d 1°-
~tion thereof will n~t ~nt~rfure unreasonably with ~h= public u~e
or onJo~unt .~f the =$er~ s. tre=t~ ~nd aou~nons of ~he.~lla~e~ and
cot=a~ abut=in~ upon a ~'ublic ~t~ee't~. road or c~on which i4tcr&
vanes bet~e.sn ~uch pr~per.ty and the
be'p~mttt~d on~ dock, one boathouse and one bo~t r~u~p o= ~lip for
Subdivimion 3. No dock shall extend further into th~ waters
of La~e Minnetor~ka th~n is reasonably necessary to accommodate the
docking o.f ~uch craft as is cumtomarily and l~wfully ~d upon the
Waters of Lake ~innotonk~ nor beyond th~ point of navigation as such
point h~s b~e~ or mh=ll be e~t~blimhed by le~ful =uther!fy,
SubdiVision 4. All such docks, bcathouaem, boat r~mpm or slips
shall bo constructed and maintain~d of such materials and of such
type of construction as will not render the m~e u~a~fe or apt to
enda~.ger the public enjoyment of such w~ters and uhal! be con, true-
ted lin such manner a~ not to be un=ightly or offensive to the publio
use and ,nJoynunt of such wat~r~, =nd shall be con=t~/ot~d in accor-
dance with any and all provisions of.~he bui!dins cod,' of th~ VillaEe
of Island Park which ams applicable.thmretOo
Subdivision 5. The Village Council or such officer as =my be
designated by the Village Council for the purDos~, m~y at any rea~cn-
able time inspect or cause to be' i~spectod, any dock, boathouse,
boat ramp or slip erected or maint~ined upon, or-abutting upon, any
~uch Dublio street, ro~d, park or cerumen, and if it sh~l! appear
that any such dock, boathouse, boat r~p or slip has not be~n con-
structed or iu not being maintained in accordance with th~ appli-
cution therefor ur the plans or icc~tion thereof ~3 approved by the
Village Council, or if it shall appear that such dock~ boathouse'~
boat ramp or sllp h~s become in such condition that it no !~ng~r
conplies ~ith the requlromonts of the ~ithin ordinance, the Village
Council by it~ clerk sh~ll forth:~ith notify the o~ner thereof in
writing specifying th~ ~y or ways in ~:hich said dock or boathouse
does not comply with th~ within or~inn~co, ~fter ~hich s~id owner
~hal~ h~ve 10 d~ys to romov~ such dock or boathouse or m~_k~ the ~ame
comply with. the terms of the within ordinance mhd the terms of the
mpplication and issuance of the license th~refor~ In th~ event such
owner ~hall fail, neglect or refuse to remove such dock or boathoume
or make the smme comply with the te~s of the within ordinance withi~
such period of l0 d~ys, the license therefor shall be revuked by
direction of the VillmEe Council and by notice in writing to the
owner thereof issued by the Village Clerk. The noticms her~in' re-
quired mh~ll be given in writing by th~ Village Clerk'by mail dir-
ected'to such dock o~ner at the address given in the cpDltc~tlon for
th,~ license for the erection of such dock or boathouse or in ~e no-
tice of transfer of such license°
Subdivision 6o If at any time it shall appear necessary to the
Village Co,,~_cil of the Villa=e of Isl.=nd P~rk, in the public interest,
or for the improvement of any public street, road, park or ce,mac'non
for the further public use or enjoyment thereof by the establishmen~
lo - 4
of public docks, bathing beac.~es, recreation grounds or the open-
ing of -~n7 street, road or common or other-~tse, any ~d ~1 Licenses
issued ~der t~e terms of the withAn ordnance ma7 be c~c~lled by
direction of the Village Co~cil upon 10 days' notice in writing
m~iled to the' holders of such liccnmes at t~e addrems appearing on
the application therefor or on' 'the notice of transfer thereof,
suc~'event the ~earne~ porti'°n 0f the fee paid for ~y such revoked
license s~all be retu~ed to the holder thereof upon de--nd therefor,
f
.s~cT~oN 8. PENALTiEs. ~y person, rim or ccrpo~tton who shall
erect or maint~ a dock, Boathouse, boat r~p or slip, without
curing'a license, therefor m~ Herein provided, or who ~hall :fail to
comply ~,ith any of the. re~luirements her~in est forth shall, upon
conviction t~er~qf~' be guilty of a misde~e~cr ~ fined not less
~h~. $~.00 nor ~ore th~ $!00.00 or imprisoned in the village or
county.~ail not l~a~ th~n } days nor ~o~ th~ 30 day~, ~ addition
moved any doc~ o~ boathouse f:r ~
w..-ch no licenze has bean i~aued in
shall h~ve been ~vok~d a~ .heroin ~=ovided, a~ the expcn~m of the
SECTION 9.' S~%VING CLAUSE. In the event any one or more of the
provisionm of this ordinance shall, be determined il!~gal, unlawful
or u~const!tutio~al, s~oh dete~mln~tlon ~h=ll not be 'co~mtrued'.Or
held to =lter, annual or rep~al or o~h~ise effect any of the oth~r
to=mu, provision3, ru~triotiun~, re.~ir~mentm or conditions of this
ordin-"--n=e. No provisionm of the within ordinm~ce sh~ll be" construed
as altering, ~'nendin=, =cdifyin= or repealing ~ny provision of the'
ordin~ncus of the Village cf Is!and Park ~lth re,peet to 'the .re%uire-.
ment~ for.bulidln~u or with respect, to the buildin= code of the
la~e of I~l-~--nd Park.
SECTION 10. PARK BOARD. In the even$ there shall hereafter
be established in the VillaGe of Island.Park a Park Board in Zhe m~-
nor provided by l~w, then all duties and functions
within ordinance to the Villa~e Co--oil may by resolution of the
shall be =:ade to' such Park.Board and such licenmes thereafter issued
by'such Pa~k Bo~d in auco=d~c~ with the within ordin=nce.
O=i~in=!ly =doptud. May
5/9/50
AN ORDINJd,]CE PRCVIDING FOR LICenSING Ai;D REGULATING DOCKS
.~D BCATH~U~ES, B¢.,",T R.~L~P~ OR SLiP~ UPON, OR .~BUTTIi~G
UP~N, PUBLIC STREETS, RC,~DS, PARKS OR CC~C. NS OF Tk~
ViLLAGE OF ISL.E~D PAPJ[, L~iNI~SOT,~, A~D PRESCRIBING
.A PL1TALTY FOR Th~Z VIOI~-%TICN ~OF
The Village Council of the Village of Island Park ordains:
SECTION 1. LICenSES REQUIRED.
No dock or boathouse shall hereafter be erected, kept or main-
tained upon, cr abutting upon, any public street, road, park or com-
mon of the Village of Island Park, Hi:n~esota, s.~thout first securing
a license therefor frc~ the Village Council of the Village of Island
Park and paying ~he fee required therefor in accordance with the te~
of the v~thin ordinance.
Li~o~o
SECTION 2. APPLIC:'~T!CHS FOR, AND ±~SU~C~ CF, ·
Each dock and each boathouse shall require a separate license.
Application for s~ch licenses shall be filed uith the Village Clerk and
all such applications shall contain the full n~me and address of the
applicant, shall be acc~upanled by s~ch description of such dock or
boathouse as the Village Council shall require in accordance vn~th t~_is
ordinance, end a description of tLe location or proposed location cf
such dock cr boathouse. The Village Clerk shall present any and all
such applications to the Village Council at its next meetin~ following
any such application and upon authorization cf the Village Cc~ucil at
any such meeting, and paynent of a license fee of ~..~l.00 for each such
dock or boathouse to the Village Treasurer, the Village Cl~rk shall
issue a license to the applicant for such dock or boathouse. No such
license shall be a,~thorized by the Village Council or issued by the
Village Clerk u~til the Villaze Council shall have first determined
that such proposed dock or boathouse, or' the ~intenance of any such
dock or boathouse existin~ at the time of the passag~ of the v~ithin
ordi~.ance, complies substantially with the ret_us of the vJithin or-
dinance -and the Village Council shall have approved the location and
type of construction thereof.
L!o~No~.~ J~ND ~,~GS.
SECTION 3. EP~RJ;~I¢~'! OF ..... '~"
Each of such licenses shall expire one year fron the date of issue
thereof, and each such license shall be represented by a metal tag or
other appropriate device which shall be affixed in a prominent place
mpon each of such docks or boathouses. The Village Council shall, by
appropriate resolution therefor, provide for the preparation and issuance
of such metal tags or devices as are required by the v&thin Section.
SECTION 4. LICA~S~,~ FOR D~CKS AND BC~THCUSES EXiS'flNG AT EiE
TI~ 6FTq~.E P.ISSAGE OF THL ~'~iD~ OP~!~A~NCE.
With respect to docks -and boathouses already erected at the time
of the passage of the uithin ordinance, a license to continue the main-
tenance thereof shall be applied for in the manner hereinbefore des-
oribed for the licensio~ of new docks and boathouses, with~u 30 days
after the wi%hln ordinance takes effect as hereinafter provided, and
all
/such applications shall be presented to the Villa.ze Council and
licenses issued therefor in the same ~n~er as is herein provided
for the licensing of the erection of new docks or boathouses.
SECTION 5- TRJ~Slr~ CF LICW~-~SES.
Licenses ~ssued ~der the terms cf the within ordinance shall
be transferable upon ten day,notice of transfer of ow~ership thereof
mailed or delivered to the Village Clerk by either party, which notice
shall contaih the full name and address of the trn~sferee of any such
license, provided that such transfer does not resmlt in the ownership
of more than one dock or more than one boathouse by such transferee and
his immediate family as provided in the within ordinance.
SECTION 6. BOAT ~PS OR SLIPS.
Each license issued pursuant to the within ordinance for the
erecticn or maintenance of a boathouse shall entitle the holder there-
of to erect and maintain cae boat ramp or slip, and in the event any
person shall desire to construct and maintain a boat ramp or slip who
is not licensed to erect cr maintain a boathouse, a license to erect
and --aintain any such boat ramp or slip shallfirst be obtained from
the Village Council in the sane harmer and for the snme fee as is
herein provided for the licensing of docks e. ud boathouses. All such
boat ramps or slips shall comply so far as m~.y be practicable with the
terms of the within ordtn~nca with respect to docks and boathouses.
SECTION ?. R~ AND RE~JL%TI¢.NS,
Subdivision 1~ The Villace Council shall determine and apprcvs
the location of each dock, boathouse, boat ramp or slip. Zith respect
to docks erected cr maintained or proposed to be erected or maintained
by owners cf land ab~tting ~pon ~y street, road cr co~cn inte~eni~
between s~ch property and the shore of Lake ~..~i~etc~a, such docks sha~
be constructed ~d maintained ~dway between the intersections of the
opposite side lines of the property of s~ch applic~t, as exte.=d~d,
~th the shore of L~e Mi~etc~a; except that variations may be per-
~tted by the Village Co~cil where it uppers imprmcticable tc
locate s~ch dock er proposed dock end where it further appears that
such d~ck er proposed dock ccnstr~cted elsewhere
reaso~bly with the use or enjoyment
by the p~blic or other mdjoini~ lot owners abutting upon ~y such
street or
Subdivision 2. No more th~ one dock~ boathouse, boat ~p
slip shall be pe~ltted for each applic~t and his ~ediate f~ly,
nave and except that the Village Co~cil ~y direct the issu~ce efa
license by the ViSage Clerk for more th~ one dock~ boathouse, boat
r~p cr slip for ~ su~ applic~t where the erection ~d location
thereof will not interfere ,~-~easonably with the public use or enjoyment
cf the waters, streets and eo~ons cf the villa:~e, end provided f~her
that the owner of m~re th~ one residence or lake cottage abutti~ apcn
a p~blic street, road or oo~om w~ch inte~enes between sach property
and the ~ore cf ~ke Mi~eto~a may be permitted one dock, cne boat-
hc~e ~d one boat r~p or slip for each such residence er cottage.
Sabdi?iston 3. No dock shall extend further into the vmters
cf Lake ~i~netonka than is reasonably necessary to accommodate the
docki~ of such crmft ~s is custommrily and la;rfully used mpon the
waters of Lake ~i_~netcnka nor beyond the point cf navigation as
such point has been or shall be established by la~rful ~thority.
Subdivision 4. All such docks, boathouses, boat ramps cr slips
shall be constructed and maintained of such materials 9nd of such
type of construction as will not render the s~e ~nsafe or apt tc
endanger the public enjoyment of such waters and shall be constructed
in such manner as not to be u~si~tly or offensive to the public use
and enjoyment of such waters, and shall be constructed la accordance
with any and all provisions cf the building code of the Village of
Island Park which are applicable thereto.
Subdivision 5. The Village Council or such officer as may be
desisnated by the Village Council for the purpose, may at any reasonable
time inspect or cause to be inspected, any dock, boathouse, boat r~mp
or slip erected or maintained upon, or abutting upon any such public
street, road, park or co~,mcn, ~d if it shall appear that any such dock,
boathouse, boat ramp or slip has not been constructed or is not being
maintained in accordance wi~h the application therefor cr the plans or
location thereof as approved by ~he Village Council, cr if it shall
appear that such dock, boath¢~se, boat r~np or slip has become in such
condition that it nc longer complies wi~h ~he require.~ents of the v~thin
ordin-nnce, the Village Council by its clerk shall fcrth%~'ith notify the
o-~ner thereof in ,~iting specifying the wmy or ¥~ays in ~'~hich said dock
cr boathouse does not comply ~ith the ~ithin ordin~nce, after which said
o%~A6r shall have l0 d~ys to remove such dock or boathouse or make the
same comply with the ter.~s of the ~ithln ordinance and ~he terms of
~he application and issuance of the license therefor. In the event
such c~er shall fail, neglect or refuse to remove such dock or boat-
house or make the s~ue comply with the terms of the within ordinance
v~thln such period of l0 days, the license therefor shall be revoked
bY direct!ca of the Village Council ~nd by notice in ~iting to the
ov~ner thereof issued by the Village Clerk. The nc~tces herein re-
quired shall be given in v~itinE by the Village Clerk by ~il directed
to such dock ov~ner at the address given in the app!icaticn for the
license for the erection cf such dock cr boathouse or in the notice
of transfer cf s~ch license.
Subdivision 6. If at any time it shall appear necessary to the
Village Council of the Vill~se of Island Park, in the public interest,
or for the i~provement of any public street, road, park, cr co~cn,
for the further public use or enjoyment thereof by the establishment
of public docks, bathing beaches, recreation gro~ds or the openin~ of
any street, road or Common cr other~ise, any and all licenses issued
u~der the terms of the within ordinance m~y be c~ncelled by direction
the Village Council upon l0 days notice in writing mailed to the
.ders cf such licenses at the address appearing cn the cpplication
~refor or on the notice of transfer thereof. In such event the
~ned portion of the fee paid for any such revoked license shall' be
returned to the holder thereof upon demand therefor.
SECTIOH 8. PENALTIES.
~4v person, firm or corporation who shall ereo~ or maintain
dock, boathouse, boat ra~p or slip, without securing a ~oense ~her~
f~r as herein provided, or ~o shall fail ~o comply ~_~h ~y of ~he
req~r~en~s herein se~ forth shall mpoa conviction ~hereof be ~il~y
efa ~sde~eaaor ~d limed no~ less ~ Five Doll, s {~.00) nor
more ~h~ 0~ H~ed Dollars {$100.00) er ~prisoned in ~he Vill~e
or Oh~y Jail no~ less t~ flwe {5) days nor more th~ ~irty (30)
days. ~ addition to the foregol~ the ViSage Co~cil ~y r~ove
ca~e to be r~ved ~y dock or boathc~e for w~oh no license has
been issued in accord-ace ~th the wi~ in ordin~ce or for w~
such license sh~l h~ve been revoked as herein providSd, a~ the ex-
pete of the o~er thereof.
S"ECTI 0N 9 · S_.~VI~.~G C I~USE.
In the event s_ny one or more of the provisions of this ordinance
shall be determined il!ag-al, unlawful or ~constitutional, such deter-
ruination shall no~ be constr,:ed or held to alter, annul or repeal or
otherwise effect any of the other tea--as, provisions, restrictions,
req'&irementa or conditions cf this ordinance. No provisions of the
.~ithin ordinance shall be construed as a!~ering, amending, modifying
or repealing any provision cf the ordinances of =he Villa-se cf Island
Park wi=h respect to the requiremen~s for ~aildings or with respec~ tc
the building code of the Village of Island Park.
SECTICN 10. PARX BO~'~D.
In the event there shall hereafter be established in the Village
of Island Park, a Park Bo..,~_~d in the manner provided by law, then all
duties and functions dele.sated in the v~ithin ordinance to the Village
Council ~ay by resolution cf the Villag$o~cil be transferred to, and
vested in such Pmrk Board, end from thenceforth all applications for
licenses required here~uder shall be made to such Park Board end s,~ch
licenses thereafter issued by such Park Board in accordance with the
within ordi~o_nce.
SECTION 111.. EFFECTIVE D~'~TE.
This ordinance shell take effect -and be in froce frocx and after
its passage and p~blication according to law.
Passed by the Village Co-moil of the Village of Island Park, Mia-
nesota, this 9th day of Hey, 1950.
5/12/60
0RDINANCW- NO. 94
AN ORDIN~uNCE PROVIDING FOR LICENSING AND REGULATING DOCKS AND BOATHOUSES,
BCklT RA~PS OR SLIPS, UPON, OR ABUTTING UPON, PUBLIC STREETS, ROADS, PARKS
OR COLONS OF /~.{E VILLAGE OF ,%fOUND, MINNESOTA, AND PRESCRIBING A pENALTY
FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF
The Village Council of the Village of Mound, ~innesota, ordains:
SECTION 1. Llcense~ Require~. No dock or boathouse shall hereafter be erected,
kept or maintained up ' or abutting upon, any public street, road, park or common of the
Village of Mound, Minnesota, without first securing a license therefor from the Village
Council of the Village of Mound and paying the fee required therefor in accordance with
the terms of the within ordinance.
SECTION 2. ADnlication For, and Issuance of~ Licenses- Each dock and boathouse
shall require a separate license. Application for such licenses shall be obtained at
the Village of Mound Office. Such application shall state, amon~ other thin~s, the full
name and address of the applicant, the description of such dock or boat house, and a
description of the location or proposed location of such dock or boathouse, and such
other ~nformation as m~y be required by the application form. Applicmtion for such
license shall be filed with the dock inspector, and he is hereby authorized to check the
appli&ations and issue the licenses. The dock licenses and boathouse licenses will be
issued only from January 1 to June I of each year. No such licenses will be authorized by
the dock inspector until he shall have first determined that such proposed dock o~ boat-
house, or the maintenance of any such dock or boathouse at the time of the passage of the
within ordinance, complies substantially with the terms of the within ordinance. Ail such
applications shall be accompanied by the reculred fee, and all such applications shall be
considered by the dock inspector, and if issued, the number of the license shall be placed
on the dock or boathouse large enough so that it will be clearly visible to persons in
boats on the lake.
S~CTION 3. Licenses for Docks and Boathouses Existln~ a__t the Time of the Passage
of the Within Ordinance. %,ith respect to docks and boathouses already erected at the time
of the passage of the within ordinance, a license to continue the maintenance thereof shal
be aDulied for in the manner hereinbefore described for the licensing of new docks and
boathouses, within 30 days afte? the within .)rdinance takes effect as hereinafteri~ded
and all such applications shall be presented to the Village Council and licenses/therefor
in the same m~nner as is herein provided for the licensin~ of the erection of new docks
or boathouses.
SECTION 4. Transfer of Licenses. Licenses issued under the terms of the ~tthin
ordinance shall be transferrable upon ten days' notice of transfer of o,~ership thereof
mailed or delivered to the Village Clerk by either part~, which notice shall contain the
full name and address of the transferee of any such license, provided that such transfer
does not result in the ownership of more than one dock or more than one boathouse by such
transfereee and his immediate family as provided in the within ordinance.
SECTI~ 5. Boat ~am~s or $1ip~. Each license issued pursuant to the within ordinanc
for the erection or maintenance of a boathouse shall entitle the holder thereof to erect
and malntain one boat ramp or slip, and in the event any person shall desire to con-
struct ~nd ~aintain a boat ramp or slip who is not licensed to erect or maintain a
boathouse, a license to erect and ~atntain any such boat ramp or slip shall first be
obtained fro~ the V~la~e Council ~n the same ~nner and for th~ sa~e fee a3 ~s here~n
provided for the l~cens~n~ of docks and boat~ses. A[~ ~ch boa2 ra~s or sl~ps shall
co~ply so far as ~y be Practicable ~th the te~s of ~he w~th~n ordinance ~th respect
to docks and boathouses.
SECTION 6. Rules ~ ~. Subdivision 1. The Village Council shall deter-
mine and approve the location of each dock, boathouse, boat ramp or slip. With respect to
docks erected or maintained or proposed to be erected or ~aintained by owners of land
abutting upon any street, road or common in~erve'ning between such property and the shore
of Lake Minnetonka, such docks shall be constructed and maintained midway between the
intersections of the opposite side lines of the property of such applicant, as extended,
with the shore of Lake Minnetonka; except th~.t variations may be permitted by the Vil-
lage Council where it appears impracticable to solocate such dock -~nd where it further
appears that any such dock or proposed dock constructed elsewhere will not interfere un-
reasonably with the use or enjoyment of said water, of Lake Minnetonka by the public or
other adjoining lot o~.~ners abutting upon any such street or common.
Subd. 2. No more than one dock, boathouse, boat ramn or
each applicant and his i.~unediate family, save and except ~hat slip -'-h~ll be permitted for
direct the issuance of the Village Council may
a license by the Village Clerk for more than one dock bo
boat ramp or slip for any such applicant where the ..... ~ . _ , 2thou~e,
interfere unreasonably w4-= ....... ===ur.on an~_ location thereof
z~n ~ne puo~ac use or en3oyment of the wate-s ...__, ..... _ not
of the village and provided further that the owner of more than one residence or lake -
rage -~buttin§ upon a public street, road or co,~unon which intervenes between such .orope~y
and the shore of Lake AL~nnetonka may be permitted one dock, one boathouse and one boat
slip for each such residence or cottage.
Sub4. 3. No dock shall extend further into the w~ters of Lake Alinnetonka than is
reasonably necessary to accomodate the docking of such craft as is customarily and law-
fully used upon the w:ters of Lake Mlnnetonka nor beyond the point of navigation as
such point has been or shall be established by lawful authority.
Subd. 4. All such docks, boathouses, boat ramps or slips shall be constructed and
maintained of such materials and of such type of construction as will not render the same
unsafe or apt to endanger the public en3oyment of such w~ters and shall be constl~lcted in
such manner as not to be unsightly or offensive to the public use and enjoyment of such
waters, and shall be constructed in accordance with any and all provisions of the building
code of the Village of ~ound which are applicable thereto.
Subd. 5. The Village Council or such officer as may be designated by the Village
Council for the
dock, boathouse,purpose' may at any reasonable time inspect or cause to be inspected, any
boat ramp or slip erected or maintained upon, or abuttin~ upon, any such
public streets, road, park or common, and if it shall a~pear that any such dock, boathouse,
boat ramp or slip has not been constructed or is not beln& maintained in accordance With
the application therefor or the plans or location thereof as approved by the Village
Council, or if it shall appear that such dock, boathouse, boat ramo or slip has become
in such condition that it no longer complies with the re0pirements of the within ordinance,
the Village Council by its clerk shall forthwith notify the owner thereof in writing
specifying the way or ways in which said dock or boathouse does not comply with the within
ordinance, after which said owner bbzll have 10 days to remove such dock or boathouse or
make the same comply., with the terms of the within ordinance and the terms of the ap-
plication and issuance of the license therefor. In the event such owner shall f~il, neg-
lect or refuse to remove such dock or boathouse or make the same comply with the terms
of the within ordinance within such period of 10 days, the license therefor shall be revok~
by direction of the Village Council =nd by notice in wrltin§ to the owner thereof issued
by the Village Clerk. The notices herein required shall be given in writing by the Vil-
lage Clerk by mall directed to such dock owner at the address given in the application
for the license for the erection of such dock or boathouse or in the notice of transfer
of such license.
Sub4. 6. If at any time it shall appear necessary to the Village Council of the
Village of Mound, in the public interest, or for the improvement of any public street, roa~
park or common for the further public use or enjoyment thereof by the establishment of
public docks, bathing beaches, recreation grounds or the opening of any street, road or
common or otherwise, any and all licenses issued under the terms of the within ordinance
m=y be cancelled by direction of the Village Council upon 10 days' notice in ,~riting mai]e'
to the holders of such licenses at the address aDpearin~ on the =pplicztion therefor or on
the notice of transfer thereof. In such event the unearned portion of the fee paid for z:
such revoked license shall be returned tD the holder thereof upon demand therefor.
SECTION 7. Dock Inspector. The VillzEe Council may from time to time appoint an
official dock inspector who shall have the authority of a police officer of the village
insofar as necessary or proper in the enforcement of this ordinance.
SECTIGNS. Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation who shall erect or maintain a d
boathouse, boat ramp or slip, without securin~ a license therefor as herein provided, or w~
shall fail to comply with any of the requirements herein set forth shall, upon conviction
thereof, b~uilty of a misdemeanor and fined not less than $5.00 nor more than $100.00 or
imprisoned in the village or county jail not less than 5 days nor more than 30 days. In
addition to the foregoing, the Village Council may remove or cause to be removed any dock
boathouse for which no license has been issued in accordance with the within ordinance or
for which any such license shall have been revoked as herein provided, at the expenses of
the o~ner thereof.
SECTION 9. Savin~ Clause. In the event any one or more of the provisions of this
ordinance shall be determined illegal, unlawful or unconstitutio~al, such determination
shall not be construed or held to alter, annul or repeal or otherwise effect any of the o
terms, provisions, restrictions, requirements or conditions of this or4inznce. No pro-
visions of the ~ithin ordinance shall be construed as altering, amending, modifying or
repealin~ any provision of the ordinances of the Village of ~und with respect to the
requirements for buildin~s or with respect to the building code of the Village of ~,~ound.
SECTION 10. Park Board. In the event there shall hereafter be established in the
Village of Mound a Park Board in %he manner provided by law, then all duties and functions
delegated in the within ordinance to the Village Council may by resolution of the Village
Council be transferred to and vested in such Park Board, and from thenceforth all applica-
tions for licenses reunited hereunder shall be made to such Park Board and such licenses
thereafter issued by such Park Board in accordance ~h the within ordinance.
~QN 11..Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force frua
and a~er its passaseo~,;'."''"'- ..'.'-.~:.
Passed by the Village Council this
_day of May, 1960.
Adopted 5-17-73 (Now City Code Sections 320 & 437)
O~ANCE NO. 305
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO T~E CONSTRUCTION
AND USE OF DOCKS IN THE VI~2~AGE OF MOUe;
ADDING ~ SECTIONS TO THE CODE OF OR~DIN-
ANCES; AND REPEALING SECTIONS 26.950,
26.952, and 26.954.
The Villagm Council of the Villag~ of Mound does ordainz
A new section 26.9501 ie added to the ordinance code to read as follows~
Section 26.9501. LicensesI Docks.
Subdlvlsion 1. Dock Defined. For purposes of this port the term
"dock" means any wharf, pier, boathouse, boat ramp, boat slip or
other structure constructed or maintained in or into the water of
a lake from publicly-owned shoreland.
Subdivision 2. License Required. No person shall erect, keep or
~min=ain a doc~. on or abutting upon any public street, road, park
or commons w~tnout first securing a license therefor from the
Villag~ Council.
Subdivision }. Other Construction. Construction of a~kv kind
abutting upon any public way, park or commons or the alte~tion
of the natural contours of land abutting any public way, park or
commons is u~lawful unless a special permit therefor ie issued by
the Villag~ Council.
Section 26.951 is amended as follows~
Section ~6.951. Application for and Issuance of Licenses.
Subdivision 1. Seoarate License Required. Each dock s~all require
a separate license. Application for such license s~all be obtained
at the Village Of Mound Office. Such application s~all s%ate,
among other things, the full name and address of the applicant,
the description of such dock, and a description cf the location or
proposed location of such dock, and such other information as may
be required b~ ~he application form. Application for suc~. licensa
shall be filed with the dock inspector, and he is hereby authorized
to check the applications and issue the licensee. No such licenses
will ~e authorized by the dock Inspector until he shall have first
determined that such proposed dock, or the maintenance of any such
dock at the time of the paesag~ of the within ord~nance, complies
substantially with the terms of the within ordinance. All such
applications s~all be accompanied by the required fee, and all such
applications shall be considered by the dock inspector, and if
issued, the license (plate) shall be placed on the dock in such
a way so that it will be clearly visible to persons in boats on
the lake.
Subdivision 2. Licenses: Priorities. The following priorities
govern the issuance of dock licenses under this port.
(a) First Priority. An abutting owner has first priority for any
location within his lot lines extended from the shoreline.
Docks shall be located as close to the center of the lot aa
possible.
(b) Second Priority. A licensee has second priority when applying
for a dock permit for the same location as in the immediately
preceding year. Such l~censee ,my apply for a looation which
was vacant in the previous year, such location to be licensed
in the order of application.
(c) Third Priorit[. Ail other applicants have third priority on
all locations vacant on April 1 of each year. Licenses will
be issued to such applicant in the order of application.
OTd/nince ~o. 305
Subdivision ~. Applicationst Deadlines. Applications for dock
licensee may be made between January i and June l, provided that
the priorities established by -~ubdivision 2 of this section are
of no effect after April 1. An application received after June 1
will be subject to a late fee of 50~ of the basic dock license
fee.
Section 26.960 Subdivisions 1, 2, 4 and 5 are amended to read aa follower
Section 2~,~60. Rules and Resulaticne.
Subdivision 1. The Village Council shall determine and approve
the location of each dock. With respect to docks erected or
mainlmined or proposed to be erected or maintained by o~ners of
land abutting upon any street, road or common intervening between
such property and the shore of Lake Minnetonka, such do, ks shall
be constructed and maintained midway between the intersections of
the opposite side lines of the property of such applicant, as
extended, with the shore of Lake Minnetonk~; except that variations
may be permitted by the Village Council where it appears impracti-
cable to so locate such dock and where it further appears that any
such dock or proposed dock constructed elsewhere will not interfere
unreasonably with the use or enjoyment of said waters of La~e
Minnetonka by ti,- public or other adjoining lot owners abutting
upon ar~ such street or common.
Subdivision 2. No more than one dock shall be permitted for each
applicant and his immediate family, save and except that the Village
Council may direct the issuance of a license by the Village Clerk
for more than one dock for any such applicant where ~,,, erection
and locatiom thereof will not interfere unreasonably with the
public use or enjoyment of the waters, streets and commons of the
Village, and provided further that the owner of more than one
residence or lake cottage abutting upon a public street, romd
or common which intervenes between such property and the shore
of Lake Minnetonka may be permitted one dock for each such resi-
dence or cottage.
Subdivision ~. Ail such docks shall be constructed and maintained
of such materials and of such type of construction as will not render
the same unsafe or apt to endanger the public enjoyment of such
waters and shall be constructed in such manner as not to be un-
sightly or offensive to the public use and enjoyment of such
waters, and shall be constructed in accordance with any and all
provisions of ~he building code of the Village of Mound which are
applicable thereto.
Subdivision ~. The Village Council or such officer as may be
designated by the Village Council for the purpose, may at any
reasonable time inspect or cause to be inspected, any dock erected
or maintained upon, or abutting upon, any such public streets, road,
park or common, and if it shall appear that ally such dock has not
been constructed o~ is not being maintained in accordance with the
application therefor or the plans or location thereof as approved
by the Village Council or if it shall appear tlmt such dock has
become in such condition that it no longer complies with the require-
merits of the within ordinance, the Village Council by its clerk shall
forthwith notify the owner thereof in writing specifying the way or
ways in which said dock does not comply with the within ordinance,
after which said owner shall have 10 days to remove such dock or
make the same comply with the terms of the within ordinance and the
terms of the application and issuance of the license therefor. In
the event such owner shall fail, neglect or refuse to remove such
dock or make the same comply with the terms of the within ordinance
within such period of 10 days, the license therefor shall be re-
voked by direction of the Village Council and by notice in writing
to the owner thereof issued by the Village Clerk. The notices herein
required shall be given in writing by the village Clerk by mail
directed to such dock owner at the address &'~ven in the application
for the erection of such dock or in the no~ice of transfer of such
license.
305
Section 26.961 is amended to read as followe~
Section 26.961. Maximum Dimensions~ Prohibited Designs of Dooks.
No dock, for which a license is required by Section 26.950 hereof,
shall exceed 24 feet in length, except where necessary to reach a
minimum water depth of 36 inches, nor shall an~ dock be built or
placed except with the longitudinal axis thereof perpendicular to
the shore line.
Section 26.980 is amended to read as follows~
Section 26.980. Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation who shall
erect or m~intain a dock without securing a license therefor as herein
provided, or who shall fail to comply with any of the requirements
herein set forth s~all, upon conviction thereof, be b~ilty of a mis-
demeanor and fined not less than $5.00 nor more than $1OO.O0 or im-
prisoned in the village or county jail not less th~n 5 dmye nor more
than ~0 days. ~ addition to the foregoi~,g, the Village Council may
remove or cause to be removed an~ dock for which no license l~s been
issued i~, accordance with the within ordi:m~ce or for which any such
license shall have beex~ revoked as herein provided, at the expense of
the owner thereof.
Section 26.9511, as amended by Ordinance No. 292, is amended to read as
follows~
Section 26.9511.
follows:
License Fees. The annual fee therefor sh~ll be as
Straight Docks $ 2.00
"L" or "T" Docks 7.00
"U" Docks 10.OO
Residents of the village who are 65 years of age and older sh~ll obtain
a license and be subject to all the provisions of this ordi~mnoe, but
the license fee sh~ll be waived for such persons who obtain such a
license for a straight dock.
Section 47.O5, paragraph 14 is repealed and a new paragraph 14a is added
to said section to read as follows~
14a
The beaching, docking, mooring, parking, storing or leaving
unattended of andy type of water craft, fish house, dock, boat
trailers, building materials or any private property on any
public water within the h~rbor limits of the village or upon
any public lands for more than 2~ hours without a valid permit;
or, the depositing of any refuse or waste or dumping in any
form on public lands or in public waters.
Sections 26.950, 26.952 and 26.954 are repealed.
Village
Adopted by Village Council Mai 8~ 197~
Published in Official Newspaper Mai 17~ 197~
AdoDted 3-6-75 (Now City Code Sections 320 & 437)
ORDINANCE NO. ~9
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHI.'.lC, THE PO.C. ITION AND DUTIES OF
DOCK I:.~SP£CTCR; PD, OVIDI~G FOR LIC.'-HSING A:~D REGULATION
OF DOCKS ABUTTING PUBLIC STREETS, PARK OR COMMONS;
REGULATING CONSTRUCTIO:.] AND USE ON PUBLIC PARKS
CO~IONS; AMENDING, REPEALING AND RE'lUMBERING SECTIONS
OF THE CITY CODE
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 26.93 is hereby added to the City Code:
Section 26.93. Duties and Responsibilities of Dock
Inspector. The City Manager shall appoint a Dock Inspector and shall
supervise his activities. The duties of the Dock Inspector shall
include, but not be limited to the following:
1. Maintain a dock location map.
2. Administer and process applications and issue dock
licenses.
3. Maintain a current listing of license holders with
addresses, priorities, dock locations, and all other
information pertaining to a license holder's qualifi-
cations.
4. Communicate and consult with the Park Advisory Commission
on matters of policy, maintaining the dock location map,
recommending improvements to strengthen the recreational
benefits provided by having public dock locations, and
he shall make recommendations to minimize any adverse
effects which may occur from public docks.
5. Communicate and consult with the council and the City
Manager on matters requiring master plan approval,
license approval and such matters as shall arise from
time to time not covered by this or any other ordinance.
6. Assist the public in the use of shoreline facilities
available for docking in whatever way necessary to insure
complete understanding of each citizen's privileges and
responsibilities.
7. Inspect all uses on public shoreline to insure proper
licensing, construction, and location, and he shall notify
licensees of all violations of ordinances or regulations
and take proper corrective action.
Section 26.9301 is hereby added to the City Code:
Section 26.9301. Licenses, Docks.
Subdivision 1. Docks defined. For purposes of this ordinance,
the term "dock" means any wharf, pier, boathouse, boat ramp, boat slip
or other structure constructed or maintained in, upon, or into the
water of a lake from publicly owned shoreland.
Subdivision 2. License required. ~]o person shall erect, keep
or maintain a dock on or abutting upon any public street, road, park or
commons without first securing a license therefor from the City in
accordance with the provisions of this ordinance.
Subdivision 3. License plate location. One license plate
shall be securely fixed to a licensed dock. The license shall be on
the shoreland end of the dock, shall be located on the right corner of
the dock facing the lake and facing up. License plates shall be issued
by the Dock Inspector after approval of ~he license application, shall
be maintained by the licensee in its original color, and shall remain
the property of the City of Mound.
Ordinance #332, Adopted 3-6-75
Subdivision 4. Transfers. Dock licenses are not transfer-
able between licensees. Ail licenses shall be issued by the City to
a nee licensee in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance.
Section 26.9302 is hereby added to the City Code and shall
read as follows:
Section 26.9302. Special Permits.
Subdivision 1. Construction on public land permits. Con-
struction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the
alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons,
is unlawful unless a special construction on public land permit is
issued by the City Council. Any proposed construction, special use
or land alteration shall require the applicant to provide necessary
drawings to scale, specifications of materials to be used, proposed
costs, and purpose for chanqe. All special permits shall require a
survey by a registered land-surveyor before a special permit will be
issued. Survey shall comply with the Mound Building Code survey
requirements. Copies of such surveys, drawings, specifications of
materials, proposed costs and statements of purpose shall be furnished
to the City and kept on file in the City offices. No special permit
shall be issued unless approved by a four/fifths vote of all the
council members.
Subdivision 2. Types of construction requirinq a special
construction on public land permit. All stairways, retaining walls,
fences, temporary structures, stone work, concrete forming, or any
type of construction shall require a special permit. No special con-
struction permit shall be issued for construction of boathouses or
other buildings on public land under this or any other ordinance of
the City of Mound.
Subdivision 3. Public land maintenance permits. The City
requires special maintenance permits, for maintaining presently con-
structed boathouses or other structures on public lands. Applications
for maintaining existing boathouses or other stru. '.ures may be obtained
from the Building Inspector at the City offices. All applications
for special maintenance permits shall be reviewed by the City Council.
The council shall determine if the maintenance permit shall be granted
or denied, and may order any structure to be removed. Special permits
are required for any maintenance such as maintaining retaining walls,
stonework, concrete or other types of improvements on public lands.
The council shall have the right to impose any reasonable conditions
they may deem advisable to protect the public's use of the public shore-
line. All structures, retaining walls, stonework, concrete or other
improvements on public lands which are in existence at the time this
ordinance becomes effective shall be required to obtain a public land
maintenance permit from this council on or before April 1, 1976.
Subdivision 4. Public aatherinas - permit required. Use of
a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more indiv-
iduals gathering together or by any organization which brings 15 or
more persons on to public lands to meet, picnic or conduct a group
activity shall require a permit from the City Manager. The manaqer
may issue said permit if he determines that the area to be used for
said meeting or group activity is available and that its collective
use will not interfere with traffic and general use of the park or
commons, and that said activity is not beyond the ability of the police
in maintaining order. The manager m~y impose other reasonable con-
ditions including a requirement that said group remove all litter and
trash and provide a cash deposit to clean up the park area, and he may
obtain the advice of the Police Chief and other staff personnel before
issuing said permits. The manager may deny said permit or refer it to
the City Council for consideration. Any permits issued by the manager
or the council shall be subject to reasonable conditions to protect the
public's investment in its public parks and to protect the general
public's use of their park and common areas.
Ordinance #332, Adopted 3-6-75
Subdivision 5. Land alteration. A special land alteration
permit shall be required ~rom the City before any alterations are
made on public lands which would result in any ohanges to the following=
shoreline, drainage, grade, pitch, slope, trees, or which require the
removal or placement of any fill, or which eliminates, adds or develops
any access road or lane. This section specifically includes any alter-
ations to uses which are non-conforming on the date this ordinance
becomes effective. No special permit shall be issued unless approved
by a four-fifths vote of all council members.
Section 26.9303 is hereby added to the City Code and shall
read as follows:
Section 26.9303. Applications for and Issuance of Dock
Licenses.
Subdivision 1. Separate license required. Each dock con-
structed and abutting a public park, commons or street, shall require
a license from the City and a license plate to be issued by the Dock
Inspector. No person shall be issued more than one license in any one
calendar year.
Subdivision 2. License applications for docks. License
applications shall be obtained at the City offices. Such applications
shall state completely the following information and such other infor-
mation as is deemed necessary by the City Manager or the Dock Inspector:
(a) Full name of the applicant.
(b) Address - applicant must present proof of residency
showing he or she is a permanent or summer resident
of the City of Mound.
(c) Physical description of the dock including a drawing
to scale.
(d) Preferred location of dock on the dock location map
of the City.
(e) Boat license number for each boat to be moored at
said dock.
(f) Such other information as may be required on the
application form.
Subdivision 3. Application filinq. Applications for licenses
shall be filed with the Dock Inspector at the City offices and he shall
recommend to the City Council that the license be approved or denied.
No license will be recommended or authorized until the Dock Inspector
determines that the proposed dock complies substantially with the terms
of all City ordinances.
Subdivision 4. Dock location. No license shall be recommended
by the Dock Inspector until he shall have first determined that the
proposed dock is suitable for the specific dock location as identified
on the official dock location map.
Subdivision 5. Denial of application. If the applicant has
not maintained a previously licensed dock, the Dock Inspector may recom-
mend to the City Council that any existing license be revoked, and that
the applicant's priorities under this ordinance be forfeited for the
current year and for the next boating season.
Subdivision 6. License priorities. The following priorities
govern the issuance of dock licenses and other dock locations:
Ca)
Pirst priority. An abutting owner has first
~riority for any location within his lot lines
e;:tended to the shoreline. Docks shall be
located in accordance with the deck location map.
Ordinance #332, Adopted 3-6-75
(b) Second priority. A licensee has second priority
m~en ~p~lying for ~ dock permit for the sane loca-
tion held by the licensee the immediatel7 preceding
year. Second priority licensee has no priority of
dock locations where a first priority license is
in effect.
(c) Third nriority. A duly qualified applicant has
third priority on locations vacant after the first
and second priority applications have been made
within the prescribed time limit described in this
ordinance. Licenses will be issued to such appli-
cants in the order of application dates. There shall
be no third priority w~ere the first and second
oriorities are in effect. Residents owning private
lakeshore within the City wflich has dockable lake
frontage shall have the last priority each year for
a dock on public lands.
(d) Administration of priority. The Dock Inspector shall
assign all locations to the anplicants uoon comnliance
with this ordinance and subject to reasonable condi-
tions and co~:ncil approval.
Subdivision 7. Annlication deadlines. Applications for dock
licenses shall be made between January 1 and March 1 of each year. In
the current year of 1975 applications must be in bF April 1 but in
subsequent years March 1 shall be considered tbs deadline.
Subdivision 8. Late anolications. Ail applications received
after March 1 (April 1 in 1975) shall be subject to a late fee of $2.00
and will be placed in a third priority category.
Subdivision 9. New residents. There will be no late fee
charged to new residents who apply after March 1 (April 1 during the
year 1975) of the calendar year in which the resident moves to the City.
The regular license fee will be charged and no penalty will attach during
that year.
Section 26.9304 is hereby added to tbs City Code and shall
read as follows:
Section 26.9304. Rules and Re~ulations.
Subdivision 1. Dock location man definition. There shall be
on file in the City Hall a drawing of the City of Mound that is main-
tained by the Dock Tnspector showing the approved locations of private docks
that may be constructed on or abutting public sborelands under the
control of the City. Such master plan shall contain the following infor-
mation:
(a) Official shoreline markers for purposes of establishing
dock locations.
(b) Indication of approved dock location scaled to proximity
with the shoreline markers.
(c) Types of docks permitted and any restrictions applic-
able to said locations.
(d) Minimum spacing between dock locations shall be shown.
(e) Dock location number shall be keyed to listing of
licensees and addresses, and the same number shall
apply to the same location each year as far as possible.
(f) Shoreline topography, depth of ~ter, soil conditions,
habitat, access, and other relevant information as is
necessary to review dock locations and to allow the
City Council and the Dock Inspector to protect the
public lands and public waters.
(g) Shoreline areas designated "winter approved dock
locations".
-4-
Ordinance #332, Adopted 3-6-75
(h) Variations from perpendicular dock to shoreline
confi~urations.
Subdiv~sion 2. Approved dock location maps sha].~ be kept and
maintained by the Dock Inspector and ahal.~ be re~le~ed by the Park
Co~e~ission at least once a year. The Park Advisory Comission shall
review the dock location map bet~en Jttly I and December 1 before each
new boatfLnc season so their r~conu, ended chan~es m~y be referred to and
considered by the City Council on or Before January 1~. Haps shall
contain all approved private dock locations as established by the council upon
the advice and reconmendation of the Dock Inspector and Park Advisory
Coaeaission. F~nal approval of the dock location map and the number of
pr"irate dock 1/censes to Be permitted shall Be the responsibility of the City
Council.
Subdivision ]. The Dock Inspector shall determine and sppro?a
the location of each permit according to the specifications of the
approved dock location map.
Subdivision h. Licensed p~ivate docks shall be erected and
maintained by the licensee at his sole expense.
Subdiv~sion 5. The Cit7 Council may suspend a dock location
it appears that a location as established on the dock location map reasonably
interferes ~ith the use of public ~tars or imposes a hardship on property
owners abutting on public streets or oublic
Subdivision 6. No more than one dock shall Be permitted for each
resident family. An apartment building or multiple dwelling OWT~r shall not
apply for dock licenses for his rent.rs or lessees. He is entitled to apply
for an individual private dock license for himself if he is a resident of the City.
Subdivision 7. All private docks shall be constructed of materials
specified by the Building Inspector and the Dock Inspector and in accordance
~ith all building codes of the City. The standards for the public health~
safety and Keneral ~Ifare and neither the matdriels or the workmanship for
an approved licensed private dock shall result in docks bein~ located on
Oublic lands ~tich are ~n~i~htly, unsafe or create a pttblic nuisance. No
tire or ti~es shall be hunk on dock posts, dock Doles or on dock hardware,
unless said tires are securely attached to the dock structure to prevent the
tire from bain,- thrown or washed into the lake. Any tire secured to a dock
shall have a hole cut in the bottom to allo~ the water to drain to prevent
breedin§ or nestle§ place for mosquitoes.
iubdiv~sion 8. The Dock Inspector or such other officer as may Be
designated by the City Hanager or the City Council, may at any reasonable time
inspect or cause to be inspected, any dock erected or maintained upon, or
abutting upon, any public street, road, park or commons and if it shall appear
that an7 such dock has not been constructed or is not being maintained in
accordance with the application or the license Eranted therefor, or that the
plans or loc~tion approved by the Council, or shall it appear that such dock
in a condition that no loncer comD]/as with the requirements of this ordinance
or other ordinances of the City; the City, by its City Clerk, shall forthwith
notify the o~ner thereof in wiring specifying the way or ~mys in which said
dock does not comply with the ordinances of the Clty~ after which said owner
shall h~ve ten daFs to remove such dock or make the same comply with the
terms of the City's ordinances and the terms of the application and issuance
of the license ~ranted t.o said licensee. In the evenL such owner sha].l fail,
neglect or refuse to remove such dock or make the same comply with the terms
o~ the City re~ulations within the period of tan days, the license therefor
shall be revoked by direction of the City Council or the Dock Inspector and
notice in wTlting to the licensee and said notice shall be issued hy the City
Clerk. Any aDoeal will be made in writing, and submitted to the City ManaKer by
a certified letter or by personal delivery to the City Hana~er for his
consideration.
iuhdi~sion 9. Ail notices herein required shall Be in writing, by
certified mail, directed to the licensee at the address given in the aoplication.
-5-
Ordinance #332, Adopted 3-6-75
Subdivision 10. No rmraon shall store, leave or abandon any
dock, dock section, dock poles or dock hardware on any public road, street,
park or c~ons.
Subdivision 11. All private docks abutting any public road, street,
park or co,~,ons must be removed from the waters of Lake Minnetonka or other
navigable waters no later than December 31 of the license year unless it is ·
winter approved dock location as shown on the master dock map.
Subdivision 12. Docking of boats of non-residential ownership is
not permitted over 4B hours.
Section 26.9305 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read as
follows:
Section 26.P305. Maximum Dimensionsz Prohibited Designs of Docks.
No dock for which a license is required by this ordinance shall be less than
24 inches wide or more than 48 inches in width and the dock shall not exceed
2~ feet in length except where necessary to reach a minimum water de~th of 36
inches, using Lake Minnetonks elevation levels of 929.~O feet above sea level.
Docks shall be of plank or rail construction. Dock posts shall be of ecual
height above the dock boards and shall be at least two rail construction £or
docks 24 inches to 30 inches in width, and rail docl~s in excess of 30 inches
in width shall be three rail construction and constructed to comply to
standards and soeci£ications approved by the Dock Insne ctor. Ail docks
shall be built or p!aced with the longitudinal axis thereof ~eroendicular to
the shoreline unless variations otherwise may be Oermitted in accordance
with the dock location map.
Section 26.9306 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read
as followsz
Section 26.9306. Penalties. Any violation of this ordinance shall
be subject to the penalties as prescribed by Section 71.09 of the City Code.
Tn addition to any cr:minal penalties as above provided, the City Council may
remove or cause to be removed any dock erected without a license as required
by this ordinance, or where any license has been revoked as provided by this
ordinance. Removal of unlicensed docks or docks which fall to comply with
the City Code will be at the expense of the owner or licensee. No person
convicted of violating city ordinances relating to docks will be issued ·
dock license for the present or for the next boating season and ssid person
forfeits any priorities set forth in this ordinance.
Section 26.9307 is hereby added to the City Code and shall read
as follows:
License Fee. The annual license fee shall be
Section 26.9307.
as follows:
Straight Dock
L, U and T Docks
Boathouses
$3.50 per front foot based on width
of dock-Minimum of $10.OO
$3.50 per front foot based on width
st widest point of dock.
25 cents ~er square foot based on
outside dimensions with ·
minimum fee of $50 per year.
This fee includes a fee for · straight
dock. L, U and T docks shall be at
the above stated rates, less s credit
for the license fee applicable for ·
straight dock.
Residents of the City of Mound 65 years of age or older shall pay 50~ of the
required license fee for a straight dock. A full license fee shall be charged
to all persons for all L, T or U docks and boathouses.
Ordinance #332, Adopted 3-6-75
Sections 26.950, 26.9501, 26.951, 26.9511, 26.95~, 26.960, 26.961,
26.9?0, 26.971, 26.980 and 26.990 are hereby re~ealed.
Adopted by the City Council February 25, 1975
Published in the Official Newspaper March 6, 1975
ORDINANCE NO. 54-1991
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 320=00, SUBD. 4,
OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO L~ND ALTERATION
ON PUBLIC L~NDS
The city of Mound Does Ordain:
Section 320:00, Subd. 4 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 320:00 Special Permits for Certain Structures on Public
Land.
Subd. 4. Land Alteration. A special land alteration permit
shall be required from the city before any alterations are
made on public lands which would result in any changes to
the following: shoreline, drainage, grade, pitch, slope,
trees, or which require the removal or placement of any
fill, or which eliminates, adds or develops any access road
or land. This section specifically includes any alterations
to uses which are nonconforming on the date this ordinance
becomes effective. No special permit shall be issued unless
approved by a four-fifths vote of all Council members.
Structures located on public lands which are ordered removed
by the city Council or by the city Buildinq official unde~
any code or law may Droceed under the supervision and direc .
tion of the City Buildinq official without the necessity fo~
obtaininq removal permits from the city Council..
o ¥
ATTEST:
city Clerk
Adopted by the City Council December 10, 1991
Publish in The Laker - December 23, 1991
ORDINANCE $62-1993
~ ORDI~TA~CE AF.Z~DI~G SECTION 320:00 OF T~ CZTY CODE
BY ADDING SUBD. 6 RELATING TO A ~ROCEDUR~ N~NUA~ FOR
RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR PRIVATE ACTIVITIES ON
PUBLIC LANDS AND AMENDING SECTION 43?: 05,
SUBDIVISIONS 4 AND 6, RELATING TO DOCK PERMITS AND
REQUIRED COMPLIANCE WITH CITY REGULATIONS
The City of Mound Does Ordain:
Section 320:00 of the City Code is amended by adding a
new subdivision 6 which shall read as follows:
Section: 320:00.
Subd. $. Public Lands Procedure Manual. The City
Manaqer and desiqnated staff are authorized and directed
So promulqate a Public Lands Procedural Manual and to
Dstablish necessary forms and procedures to administez
She Droqram and permit procedures set forth in this
Section 320. The manual and procedures set forth in sai,;
manual shall be reviewed and approved by the City Counci]
by Resolution. The City Council may amend or chanqe th,.
Public Lands Procedural Manual by Resolution.
Section 437:05, Subds. 4 and 6 of the City Code are amended to
read as follows:
Subd. 4. Application Filinq. Applications for licenses
shall be filed with the Dock Inspector at the City
offices and he ~he Dock Inspecto~ shall recommend to the
City Council that the license be approved or denied. No
license will be recommended or authorized until the Dock
Inspector determines that the proposed dock complies
substantially with the term of all City ordinances. ~he
9pplication shall contain a reminder and/or warninq t,-,
the applicant that a dock license will not be issued fo%
any dock on public land where the applicant has a
correction order pendinq concerninq a stairway oz
structure used to access the dock. The license will not
be issued until compliance with the correction order has
been completed or satisfactory arranqements have bee~
~ade with the Dock Inspector to complete the correctiw
meas_____ures.
$31'
ATTEST:
Bubd. 6. Denlal of ~ppllcat~on. If the applicant has
not maintained a previously licensed dock, the Dock
Inspector may recommend to the City Council that any
existing license be revoked, and the applicant's
priorities under this Section 437 be forfeited for the
current year and for the next boating season. A dock
~icense will not be issued for any dock on Public land
where the aDDlicant has a correction order Dendinq
concerninq a stairway or structure used to access the
dock. The license will not be issued until comDliance
with the correction order has been completed or
satisfactory arranqements have been made with the Dock
Inspector to complete the corrective measures.
Mayor
City Clerk
Adopted by the City Council April 13, 1993
Published in the Official Newspaper, The Laker, April 19, 1993
5/]2/60
Division Z -
Chapter Z6 - Part F
PAi{T F BULLDL'~G CODE
DOClCS, BOATHOUSES, BOAT P. A2viPS AND SLIPS
SECTION Z6. 950 Licenses l~equired No dock or boathouse sh~ll hereafter be
erected, kept or maintained upon or abutting upon, any public street, road,
p~k or co~ons of ~e V~age of ~o~, ~esota, ~thout f~st sec~
a license therefor from the V~lage Co~c~ of ~e V~lage of Mo~d ~d pay-
~g the fee req~red ~erefor ~ accord~ce ~th ~e ter~s of the
ord~ce.
SECTION 26.951 Application For and Issuance of, Licenses ~ach dock and
boathouse shall require a separate license. Application for such license
sba/1 be obtained at the Village of Mound Office. Such application shall state,
among other things, the full name and address of tke applicant, the descrip-
tion of such dock or boat house, and a description of the location or proposed
location of such dock or boathouse, and such other information as may be
required by the application form. Application for such license shall be filed
v~ith the dock inspector, and he is hereby authorized to check the applications
and issue the licenses. The dock licenses and boathouse licenses ~ be
issued only from January 1 to June 1 of each year. No such licenses will b~
authorized by the dock inspector until he shall have first determined that suck
proposed dock or boathouse, or the maintenance of any such dock or boathouse
at the time of the passage of the within ordinance, complies substantially ~ith
the term. s of the v~ithin ordinance. All such applications shall be accompanied
by the required fee. a~nd all such applications sh~lt be considered by the dock
inspector, and if issued, the number of the license shall be placed on the dock
or Boathouse large enough so that it vv~ll be clearly v~sible to persons in boats
on the lake.
SEC
TION 26. 952 Licenses for Docks and Boathouses Existin~ at the Time of
the Passage of the Within ordinance %Vith respect to
docks and boathouses already erected at the time of the passage of the with/n
ordinance, a license to continue the maintenance thereof shall be applied for
in the manner hereinbefore described for the licensing of ne~v docks and
boathouses, within 30 days a~ter the within ordinance takes effect as herein-
after provided, s. nd all such applicat ohs shall be presented to the Village
Council and licenses issued therefor in the same m~n~ter as is herein provid-
ed for the licensing of the erection of ne%v docks or Boathouses.
SECTION 26. 953 Transfer of Licenses Licenses issued under the terms of
the wit,kin ordinance shall be transferrable upon ten days' notice of transfer
of ownership thereof rnai/edor deliveredto the Village Clerk by either party,
Division Z
Chapter Z6 - Part F
Page Z
V~nichnotice shall contain the full name and address of the transferee of any
such license, provided that such transfer does not result in the ovznership of
more than one dock or more than one boathouse by such transferee ar.d his
immediate family as provided in the v~thin ordinance.
SECTION Z6.95~i Boat Ramps or Slips Each license issued pursuant to the
v~ithin ordinance for the erection or maintenance of a boathouse shall entitle
the holder thereof to erect and maintain one boat ramp or slip, and Lu the
event any person shall desire to construct and maintain a boa~ ramp or slip
who is not licensed to erect or maintain a boathouse, a license to erect and
maintain any such boat ramp or slip shall first be obtained from the Village
Council in the s~rne manner and for the same fee as is herein provided for the
licensing of docks and boathouses. All such boat rm_~nps or slips shall comply
so f~r as may be practicable %vith the terms of the v~ithLr~ ordinance wil:h
respect to docks and boathouses.
SECTION 26. 960 Rules and regulations Subdivisions 1. The Village Council
shall determine and approve the location of each dock, boathouse, boat ramp
or slip. With respect to docks erected or maintained or proposed to be
erectecl or maintained by o~vners of land abutting upon any street, road or
cornrnon intervening between such property and the shore of Lake lViinnetonl4a,
such docks shallbe constructed and maintained ~-~. iclway between the intersect-
ions of the opposite side lines of the property of such applicant, as extended,
with the shore of Lake i%4innetonka; except that v~.riations may be permitted
by the Village Council where it appears impracticable to so locate such dock
and v~here it further appears that any such dock or proposed dock constructed
elsewhere vwill not interfere unreasonably with the use or enjoyment of said
waters of Lake 1viirmetonka by the public or other adjoining lot owners abutting
upon az~y such street or common.
Subidivsion Z No more than one dock, boathouse, boat ramp or slip shall be
permitted for each applicant and his immediate family, save and except that
the Village Council may direct the issuance of a license by the Village Clerk
for more than one dock, boathouse, boat ramp or slip for any such applicant
where the erection and location thereof will not interfere unreasonably v~ith
the public use or enjoyment of the waters, streets and commons of the Village:
a_nd provided further that the owner of more than one residence or lake cottage
abutting upon a public street, road or common which intervenes between such
property and the shore of Lake 54innetonka may be permitted one dock, one
boathouse and one boat slip for each such residence or cottage.
Subdivision 3. No dock shall extend further into the waters of Lake !k4inne -
tonka than is reasonably necessary to accomodate the docking of such craft
as is customarily and lav~f~lly used upon the waters of Lake 1V[innetonka nor
beyond the point of navigation as such point has been or shall be established
by lawful authority.
Division 2
Chapter 26 - Part F
Page 3
S~ubdivison 4. All such docks, boathouses, boat raznps or s!ips sh~11 be
constructed a.~d nna/ntzined of such ~ater~s ~d of such t~e of construction
as ~ not ren~er ~e s~e ~a~e or~ptto end, er t~e public enjoy~en: of
such w~ers ~ sh~l be constructed ~ such ~er as not to be ~si~htly~r
o~ensive to tAe public use ~d enjoyment of such waters, ~d .sh~l be con-
structed ~ accor~ce ~ ~y ~d ~ provisions of ~e bu~g code of
V~age of ~o~4 ~ch are applic~ie thereto.
Sub.vision 5 The V~age Co~c~ or such o~icer as ~ay be ~esigned By the
V~age Co~c~ for the p~pose, may ~ ~y reasonable ti~e inspect or cause
to be ~spected, ~y dock, boa~ouse, Boat r~p or slip erected or
upon, or ~~g upon, ~y such public streets, road, p~k or common,
~ it sh~l appe~ that ~y such dock, boathouse, boat r~p or sliphas not
been constructe~ or is not Being ~nt~e~ ~ accord~ce ~th ~e application
~erefor or the plus or location thereof as approve~ by the V~lage Co~c~,
or if it sh~l appear that such dock, boathouse, boat r~p or slip has
~ such condition that it no longer co~plies ~th the requ~e~ents of the
~ ordinance, the Village Co~c~ by its clerk sh~ fortk~th notify the o~er
t}::reof in ~it~ specifyin~ the w=y or ways ~ which s~d dock or boathouse
does not co~ply with the ~th~ ordin~ce, ~ter which sai~ o~er sh~lbave
10 days to re~ove such dock or boathouse or ~e the s~e co~ply ~th the
ter~s of the ~th~ ordin~ce ~d ~e ter~s of the application ~d issu~ce of
the license therefor. ~ the event such o~er sh~]] fa~, neglect or refuse tc
re~ove such dock or boa~ouse or ~e the s~e co~ply ~th the ter~s
~he ~th~ or~n~ce ~th~ such period of 10 days, the license ~erefor
be revoked by ~irection of the V~lage Co~c~ ~d by notice ~ ~iting to the
o~er thereof issued by the V~la~e Clerk. The notices herein req~red
be ~iven in ~it~g by the V~lage Clerk by mail ~rected to such dock o~er
tlxe address ~iven in the application for the license for the erection of such
dock or boathouse or in the notice of tr~sfer of such license.
S~division 6 ~ at ~y ti~e it sh~ appear necessary to the V~la~e Co.cji
of the VXllage of ~o~d, ~ the public ~terest, or ~r the ~prove~ent of
public street, road. p~k or co~on for the further p~lic use or enjo~ent
thereof by ~%e establis~ent of public docks, bathin~ beaches, recreation
gro~ds or the ope~g of ~y street, road or co~on or 6~er~se, ~
~ licenses issued ~der the ter~s of the ~th~ or~n~ce may be c~ce~e~
by direction of the ViSage Counc~ upon 10 days' notice in ~it~g m~ed to
the holders of such licenses at the ad. ess appear~g on the application ~ere
for or on the notice of tr~sfer thereof. ~ such event :he une~ned portion
of the fee paid for ~y such revoked license sh~ be returned to the holder
thereof upon de~d therefor.
SECTION 26. 970 Dock Insp,ecto=_ The Village Council may fromn time to tLrne
appoint an official dock inspector who shall have the authority of a police
officer of the village insofar as necessary or proper in the enforcement of
this ordinance.
Division Z
Chapter Z6 - P~rt F
Page 4
SECTION 26.90 Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation who shall
erect or maintain a clock boathouse, boat ramp or slip, v~itl%out securing a
license therefor as herein provided, or who shall fail to comply with any of
the requirements herein set forth shall, upon conviction thereof, Be guilty of
a misdemeanor and fined not less than $5.00 nor more than $100.00 or
imprisoned in the village or county jail not less than 5 days nor znor~ than 30
days. In addditon to the foregoing, the Village Council may remove or
cause to be removed any dock or boathouse for which no license has Been
issued in accordance with the within ordinance or for which any such license
shall have Been revoked as herein provided, at the expense of the owner
the r e of.
SECTION 26. 990 Park Board In the event there shall hereafter be establish-
ed in the Village of Mound a Park Board in the manner provided by law, then
all duties and functions delegated in the within ordinance to the Village Council
mayby resolution of the Village Council be transferred to and vested in such
P~rk Board, and from thenceforth all applications for licenses hereunder
shall be made to such Park Board and such licenses thereafter issued by
such Park Board in accordance v~ith the within ordinance.
(Ord. 94 - 5/12/1960)
PART F BUILDING CODE (Ord. 332 - 3/6/1975)
DOCKS, BOATHOUSES, BOAT RAMPS AND SLIPS
Chapter 26 '- Part
SECTION 26.93. Duties and Resoonsib~l~tles of Dock Insoector. The City
Manager shall appoint a Dock Inspector md shall supe~ise his activities.
The duties of the Dock Inspector shall include, but not be limited to
the fo~_low~ug:
1. Mainta~u a dock location map.
2. Admfm!ster and process applications and issue dock licenses.
3- HaintaLu a ¢~rrent l!st~ug of l~cense holderm with addresses,
priorities, dock location~, and all other information pertaining
to a license holder's qualifications°
4. Communicate and consult with the Park Advisory Commission on
matters of policy, maintaining the dock location map, reco~endi~g
improvements to strengthen the recreational benefits provided
by having public dock locations, and he shall make recommend~tion~
to m~mize any adverse effects wkich may occur from pub~_ic docks..
5. Communicate and consult with the council and the City Manager on
matters requiring master plan approval~ license apProVal and_such
matters as shall arise from time to time not covered by this or
any other or~tuance.
6. Assist the public in the use of shoreline facilities available
for docking in whatever w~y necessary to insure complete
understanding of each citizen' s privileges mhd responsibilities.
7. Inspect al! uses on public shoreline to Lusure prooer licensing,
construction, and location, and he shall notify licensees of all
violations of ordinances or regulations and take proper corrective
action.
SECTION 26.9301. Licenses~ Docks.
Subdivision !. Docks Defined. For purposes of this ordinance, the term
"dock" means any wharf, pier, boathouse, boat ramp., boat slip or other
structure constructed or maintained in, upon, or into the water of a
lake from publicly o~ed shoretand.
Subdivision 2. License required. No person shsl! erect, keep or maintain
~ dock on or abut%lng upon any public street, road, park or commons without
first securing a license therefor from the City in accordance w~_th the
provisions of t~is ordinance.
Subdivision 3. License olate location. One license plate shall be
securely fixed to a licensed dock. The license sha]_l be .on the shore!and
end of the dock, shall be located on the right corner of the dock facing
the lake and facing up. License plates shall be issued by the Dock
Inspector after approval of the license application, shall be maintained
by the licensee in its original color, and shall remain the property of the
City of Mound.
Subdivision 4. Transfers. Dock licenses are not transferable between
licensees. AT1 licenses shaLl be issued by the City to a new licensee in
accordance with the provisions of this ordinance.
Pa~s 2
ECTION 26.9302. Soecia! Permits.
Subdivision 1. Construction on nub!lc land. hermits. Construction of
any kind on any public w~y, park or commons, or the alteration of the
natural contour of any public ~my, park or commons, is unlawful unless
a special construction on public land permit is issued by the City Council.
Any proposed constrmction, special use or land alteration shall require the
applicant to provide necessary dra'.%ngs to scale, specifications of materials
to be used, proposed costs, and purpose for change. All special permits
shall require a survey by a registered land surveyor before a special
permit wi It be issued. Survey s,hall comply with the Mound Build'nE Code
survey requirements. Copies of such surveys, drawLugs, specifications of
materials, proposed costs and statements of purpose shall be furnished to
the City and kept on file in the City offices. No special permit shall
be issued unless approved by a four/fifths vote of a]_l the council members.
Subdivision 2. Tip. es of construction requirin~ a soecia! construction on
public land ?ermit. ~!l stairways, retai~4=g walls, fences, temporary
structu_~s, stone work, concrete fo.~aing, or any type of construction shall
require a special permit. No special construction pe..-mit shall be issued
for const.-uction of boathouses or other buildings on public land under this
or any other ordinance of the City of Mound.
Subdirision 3- Public land maintenance oermits. The City requires special
ma4_utenance pe_.-~_ts, for maintaining presently constructed boathouses or
other st-~uctures on public lands. Applications for ma~_utaining exir%ing
boathouses or other structures may be obtained from t.he Building Inspector
at the City offices. All applications for special maintenance permits shall
be reviewed by the City Council. The council shall dete..~%ine if the maintenance
permit shall be granted or denied, and may order any st.-ucture to be removed.
Special pe.~its are required for any maintenance such as maintainLng re-
taining wa~s, stonework, ccncrete or other t)~es of i~provements on oublic
lands. The council shall have the right to impose any reasonable conditions
they may deem ad~_sable to protect the public's use of the public shoreline.
All structures, retaining walls, stonework, concrete or other improvements
on public lands which are in existence at the tLme this ordinance becomes
effective shall be required to obtain a public land maintenance perm.~t from
this council on or before Ap~l l, 197_6.
Subddvision 4. Public Katherin~s -oermit required. Use of a public park
or co.~m, ons by any group consisting of '15 or more individuals gather%rig
together or by any organization '.~.ich brings 15 or more persons on to public
lands to meet, picnic or cond'~ct a group activity shall require a permit
from the City Manager. The manager may issue said pe.--mit if he determines
that the area to be used for said meeting or group acrid_ti is available
and that its collective use ~d~l not interfere ~%th traffic and general use
of the park or commons, and that said activity is not beyond the ~bility of
the police in maintaining order. The manager may i~pcse, other reasonable
conditions incluC-~u~ a requirement that said group remove all litter and
trash and prov~de a cash deposit to clean up the park area, and he may
obtain the advice of the Police Chief and other staff personnel before issuing
said pe.~mits. The manager may deny said permit or refer it to the City Council
for consideration. Any permits issued by the manager or the council shall be
subject to reasonable conditions to protect the public's investr, ent in its
public parks and to protect the g~neral nublic's use of their park and
c om~on areas. ~
u,vi. ~gl't
Chapter 26 - Part
Page
Subdi~.sion 5- Land alteration. A special land alteration permit shall
be required from the City before any alterations are made on public lands
which wo~!d result in any chan~e~ ~ the ~o~1o~:' shoreline, ~a~a~e~
[rads, pitch, s!o~, trees, or w~ch require the removal or placement of
any f~, or ~ich e~ates, sd~ or de,lops a~ access road or lane.
~s section spec~ica~y ~cludes any al~rations to uses w~ch are non-
co~o~g on the ds~ t~s or~nance becomes effective. No s~cial pe~t
sba~ ~ issued u~ess approved ~ a four-f~ths vo~ of a~ co~c~ members.
SECTION 26.9303. A'~n!ications .for and Issnance of Dock Licenses'..
Subdivision 1. Separate license required. Each dock constructed add
abutting a public park, commons or street, sba~l require a license from the
City and a 3_icen:e plate to be issued by the Dock Inspector.. ~o person shall
be issued more than one license in any one calendar year.
Subdivision 2. License apo!ications for docks. License applications shall
be obtained st .the. City offices. Such applications shmL1 state completely
~be fo]~o,wing information and such other information as is deemed necessary
ny the .City Manager or the Dock Inspector.
(a) Full name of the applicant.
(b) !.d-~__-ess - applicant must present proof of residency s. bo .w~_ng he or she
is a per~anent or summer resident of the City of Mound.
(c)' Physical description of the dock including a dra'.~ng to scale.
(d) Preferred location of dock on the dock location map of the City.
(e) Boat license number for each boat to be moored at said dock.
(f) Such other ~formation as may be required on the application form:
Subdivision 2A. Two residents may share a dock subject to the conditions
contained herein. Where dock permits are shared and issued to two residents
entitled to permits of the first and second priority then the following
conditions shall apply:
a. That permits be for straight docks only.
b. That duplicate information (includlng boat licenses) for each of the
licensees be included on the license application.
c. That each Of the licensees retain priority rights to individual dock
permits as vacation occurs in the immediate subdivision shoreline,
second only to a licensee previously displaced from said shoreline.
d. That the fee for each licensee shall be ½ the fee per Section 26 9307
(Ordinance .J/418) '
(Ord. 426- 3-9-82)
Subdivision 3. Apnlication f~l~nz. ~'pp~ications for licenses sha~l be fi~ed
with the Dock Inspector at the City offices and he sba!l recommend to the
City Counc~_! that the license be approved or denied. No license will be
recom~,.ended or_mu, thorized until the Dock Inspector determines that the proposed
dock complies substantially ~th the terms of all City ord3_nances.
Subdivisio~ 4. Dock Location. No license shall be recommended by the Dock
Inspect6r untd_l he shall have first determined that the proposed dock is
suitable for the specific dock location as identified on the official dock
location map. _
Division 2
Chapter 26 - Part
Page
Subdivision 5- Denial of application. If the applicant has not maintaine~
a previously licensed dock, the Dock Inspector may recommend to the City.
Council that any ex~sting license be revoked, and that the app]_icant's
priorities under this ordinande be forfeited for the current year and for
the next boating season.
Subdivision 6. License oriorittes. The following priorities .govern the
issuance of dock licenses and other dock locations:
(a) First nriority. An abutting owner has first priority for "
any location within his lot lines extended to the shoreli~.
Docks shall be located'in'accordance ~ith the dock location map.
(b) Second priority. A licensee has second priority ~en applyin~
for a dock permit for the same location held ~y the licensee the
fnr~ed~ately precea4ng year. Second priority licensee has no
priority of dock locations ~%ere a first priority license is i~
effect.
(c) Third orio~--ity. A duly qualified applicant has third
priority on locations vacant after the first and second
priority applications have been made %~thin the prescribed time
limit described in this ordinance. Licenses wiq] be issued to such
applicants ~_n the order of application dates. There shall
be no third priortty where the first and second priorities
are in effect. Residents ow~tng private !akeshore within
the City which has dockable lake frontage shall have the last
priority each year for a dock on pub/~ lands.
(d) Administration of ~riorit~. The Dock Inspector shall assigm
all locatior~ to the applicants upon cdmp!iance ~ith this
ordinance and subject to reasonable conditions and couna~3
approval.
Subdivision 7. Aoolication deadlines. Applications for dock licenses shall
be made between January 1 and March 1 of each year. In the current year of
1975 applications must be in by April I but in subsequent years March 1 shall
be'~onsidered the deadline.
Subdivision 8. Late 'aoolications. Ell applications received after March 1
(April I in 1975) shall be subject to a late fee of ~ and will be placed
in a third priority category. ~3.~
Subdivision 9. New residents. There w~ be no late fee charged to new
residents who apply after March I (April l duriug the year 1975) of the
calendar year in which the resident moves to the City. The regular license
fee ~ be charged and no penalty will attach during that year.
SECTION 26.9304. Rules and Regulations.
Subdivision !. Dock location m~o definition. There sha]_l be on file in the
City Hall a dra-~ing of the City of Mound that is maintained by the Dock
Inspector sho~ng the approved locations of private docks that may-be con-
structed on or abutting public shorelands under the control of the City.
Such master plan shall contain the following information.
DivTsion 2
Chapter 26 - Part F
Page 5
(a) Official shoreline markers for purposes of establisb~ dock locations.
(b) Indication of approved dock location scaled to proximity with the
shoreline markers.
(¢) T ~ypes of 'docks permitted and any restrictions applicable 'to said
locations.
(d) Minimum spacing between dock locations shall be shown.
(e) Dock location number sha]_l be keyed to listing of licensees and
addresses, and the same number shall apply to the same location
each year as far as possible.
(f) Shoreline topography, depth of w~ter, soil conditions, habitat,
access, and other relevant.information as is necessary to review
dock locations and to allow the City Council and the Dock Inspector
to protect the public lands and public ~mters.
~I Shoreline areas designated "winter approved dock locations".
Variations from perpendicu2ar dock to sborel~ue configurations.
Subdivision 2. ApproVed dock location maus shall be kept and maintained by
the Dock Inspector and shall be reviewed ~y the Park Conm~ission at least once
a year. The Park Advisory Commmission shall review the dock location map
between July I and December 1 before each new boating season so their
reco~,~ended change.s_ .may be r._e_f.e~rr__e_dto and considered by the. Cit. y Council on
or before January 15. Maps sha]_l contain all approved private dock locations
as established by the-council upon the advice and recom~.endation of the
Dock Inspector and Park Advisory Co.-~ission..~ FLnal approval of the dock
location map and the number of private dock licenses to be perm,~tted shall
be the responsibility of the City Council.
Subdivision 3. The Dock Ihspector shall determiue and approve the location
of each permit according to the specifications of the approved dock location
map.
Subdivision 4. Licensed private docks shall be erected and maintaLned by
the licensee at his sole expense.
Subdivision 5. ~ne City Council may suspend a dock location where it appears
'that a location as estab!isbed on the dock location map reasonably interferes
with the use of public waters' or imposes a hardship on property owners abutting
on ~.ub~c streets or public commons.':
Subdivision 6. No more than one dock sba~_l be permitted for each resident
fam~_!y. Ah apartment building or mul'tiple dwelling o~rner shah not apply
for dock licenses for his renters or lessees. He is entitled to apply for
an individual private dock 3-icense for himself if he is a resident of the
City.
Subdivision 7. A]_I private docP~ shall be constructed of materials specified
~y the Bu~l~g Inspector and the Dock I~spector and i~ accordance with all
buildd_ng codes of the City. The standards for the public health, safety and
general welfare and neither the materials or the workmanship for. and approved
licensed private dock shall reset in docks being located on public lands
which mre unsightly, unsafe or create a public nuisance. No tire or tires
Division 2
Chapter 26 - Part F
Page ~
shall be hung on dock posts, dock poles or on dock hardware, unless said
tires are securely attached to the dock structure to prevent the tire from
-being thrown or washed into the lake. Any tire secured to a dock shall
h~ve a hole cut in the bottom to allow the water to drain to prevent a breeding
or nesting plsce for mosquitoes.
Subdiv;sion 8. The Dock Inspector or such other officer as may be designated
by the City Manager or the City Council, may at any. reasonable time inspect o~
cause to be inspected, any dock erected or maintained upon, or abutting upon, any
public street, road, park or commons and if it shall appear that any such dock has
not been constructed or is not being maintained in accordance with the application
or license granted therefor, oP with the plans or location approved by the Council,
or shall it appear that such dock is in a condition, that no longer complies with
the requirement of this ordinance or other ordinances of the City; the City, by
its City Manager or any other officer designated by him shall forthwith notify
the owner thereof in writing specifying the way or ways in which said dock does
not comply with the ordinances of the City, after which said owner shall have ten
days to remove such dock or make the same comply with the terms of the City's
ordinances and the terms of the application and issuance of the license granted
to said licensee. In the event such owner shall fail, neglect or refuse to remove
such'dock or make the same comply with the terms of the City regulations within
the period of ten days, the license therefor shall be revoked by direction of the
City Council or the Dock Inspector and by notice in writing to the licensee, and
said notice shall be issued by the City Manager or any other officer designated
by him. Any appeal will be made in writing and submitted to the City Manager by
a certified letter or by personal delivery to the City Manager for his consideration
(Ord. 417- 7-28-81)
SECTION 26.9304
Subd. 9 All notices herein required shall be in writing, by, certified mail,
directed to the licensee at the address given in the application.
Subd. 10 Winter dock storage by permit holders;
A. Docks may be left in the water during the winter months providing the
following conditions are met:
1. The required dock license for the following year must be applied for
and paid by the tenth day of January.
2. Docks may be partially removed, provided that those sections left in
public waters are complete. No poles, posts, stanchions or supports standing
alone shall remain in public waters.
3. Docks must be brought up to the construction standards outlined in this
ordinance within two weeks after the ice goes out in the Spring of the year.
if not, the procedures as specified in subdivision 8 of this ordinance will apply
Oivislon 2
Chapter 26 - Part F
Page 7
4. Docks may not be left in the water or on public land if they conflict
with the followlng uses as shown on the dock location map:
a. Slide area
b. Snowmobile crossings
c. Skating rinks
d. Trails
e. Road access
f. Other conditions or circumstances which are determined by the
Councll to haye an adverse affect on adjacent properties.
B. Docks may be stored on commons during the winter months p~oviding, the follow-
ing conditions are met:
1. Docks may not be stores on the commons if they conflice with the follow-
ing uses as shown on the dock location map:
a. Slide area
b. Snowmobile crossing
c. Skatlnq rinks
d. Trails
e. Road access
f. Other conditions or circumstances which are determined by the
Councll to have an adverse affect on adjacent properties.
2. Docks may not be stored on common~ shown on the dock locatlon map as
havlng topographic conditions which are too steep, or have fragile flora or ~
tree damage may occur due to tree density or where there is unstable ground.
3. Docks may be stored only in areas designated for dock permits and as
shown on the dock location map.
4. All storage shall b~ done in an orderly, compact and unobtrusive manner.
5- Doc~s and associated hardware must be r~,noved from the common and/or
public lands between June 1st and September 1st of each year.
6. .Storage shall be restricted to dock materials~ dismantled docks and
~ismantled boat lifts.
7. The Park Con~is~ion, City Dock Inspector and City Council shall review
the dock location map each year and designate areas available for winter stored
and also designate the areas rest(icted because of the condition~ heretofore
staged. (Ord. 77-36D D-27-77)
Subdivision 11. All private docks abuCting any public road, street, park or
cocoons must be removed from the waters of Lake Minneto~ka or other'navlgable
~aters no later than December 31 of the license year unless it is winter appro,.
dock location as shown on the master dock map.
Division 2
Chapter 26 - Part
Page
Subdivision 12. Docking of boats not owned by the dock licensee is not permitted
for a period in excess of 48 hours. The City may check with the State of Minnesota
to determine if the boat docked at the licensed dock is owned by the licensee
and/or a member of the same household as the licensee. Any boat registered to
someone not a member of the licensee's household shall not be docked in excess of
48 hours unlessa Temporary Visiting Dockage Permit has been obtained from the City
and the fee established by the City Council has been paid. No more than one
Temporary Visiting Dockage Permit may be issued in any calendar year to an
Individual dock licensee. All Temporary Visiting Dockage Permits shall contain the
State registration number of the boat and shall be limited to 21 days. Any
vTolation of this section by th~,~ock licensee shall result in the loss or
revocation of the dock license unless the City Council shall de~ermlne ~pon
evidence submitted by the licensee that there were mitigating circumstances. The
City Council may determine that revocation is too severe a penalty and may then
condition said license so that any future violation will result in automatic
revocation. (Ord. 417- 7-28-81)
Subdivision 13. Dock Licenses and permits issued b~ 't~ 'C]-ty are pers~hal in ~]-
and may be used only by the licensee or members of their household. No dock licensee
by the City or located on public streets, roads, parks or public commons may be rentc
leased or sublet to any person, partnership or corporation. If a licensee or permit
holder rents, leases, sublets or in any manner charges or receives consideration for
the use of his dock, his license shall be revoked. (Ord 78Z~87 9-27-78)
SECTIOt~ 26.~305. I-taximum Dimensions, Prohibited Designs of-Docks. ~Io dock'for t.~hich
a license is required by this or dinance shall be less than 24 inches t-~id~ or'more
than 48 inches in t-~id~h and the dock shall not exceed.24 feet in length except
t-~here necessary to reach a minimum water depth of 36 inches, using L~ke lilnnetonkr
elevation levels of ~29.40 f~et above sea level. Docks shall be of plant or 'rail
construc,tlon. · Dock posts shall be of.equal height above the dock boards and shal~
be at least two rail constructior~ for docks 2[~ inches to 30 inches in t-~]dth, and
rail docks in excess of'30 inches in width shall be three rail construction and
constructcc~ to comply to standards and specifications approved by the Dock Inspec-
tor. All docks shall be built or placed ~,zlth the longitudinal axis thereof per-
pendicular to the shoreline unless variations otherwise n~.ay be permitted in ac-
cordance t¢ith th~ dock location map...
SECTiOt'I 26.~306. Penalties..Any violation of this ordinance shall be subject to the
penalties as prescribed by. Section 71.O~ of the City Code. In acldition to any
criminal penalties as above provided, the City Council may remove or cause to b~-
remove~ any ~ock erected without a license as required by this ordinabce, o'r t.~her
any license'has been revoked as provided by this ordinance. I~emoval of unlicense
docks or docks ~-~hich fail to comply with the City Code trill be at the expense of
the owner or licensee, tlo person convicted of violating City or~[inances relating
to docks will be issued a dock license for the present or for the next boating
s~ason ~nd said person forfeits an)' priorities set forth in this ordinance.
D|vislon 2
Chapter 26 - Part
page
Section 26.9307.
be as follows:
L~cense Fee~
The annual license fee shall
Straight Dock Fee
L or T Dock Fee
U or H Dock Fee
Sailboat Mooring Fee
$ 85.00
$135.00
$160.00
$ 85. O0
Residents of the City of Mound 65 years of age
or older shall pay 50% of the required license
fee for a straight dock. A full license fee
shall be charged to all persons for L, T, U,
or H docks and boathouses.
(ord. 33Z- 3-6.-75) (or~. ~4q- 1-Z0-75) (Ord. 3~0- lZ-Z7-78))
(Ord. ql8 - B-lO-Sl) (Ord. 460 - 2-20-8¥}' (Ord. 472 - 1-14-85) ':
Sectlon 2G.~)50 - repealed (Ord. 305 - 5/17/73
'.Scctlon 2G.g501 - repealed (Ord. 332 -
'Sectlon 26.51"- repealed (Ord. 332- 3/G/75)
Section 26.~$2 '- repealed (Ord. 305 - 5/17/7))
Se~tlon 26.~53 repealecl (Ord. 3])2 -
· Sectlon 2G.~Sq - repealed (Ord. 305 -
Section 2G.DGO - repealed (OrdL 332 - 3/G175)
Section 2G.~$1I ~ repealed (Ord. 33Z- 3/~/75}
S¢ctlon 2G.°~61 - repealed (Ord. 332. -
Section 2(;.~?0 - repealed (Ord. 332
Section 2&.~)71 - rep.ealed (Ord. 332 -
· Sectlon 26.~80 - repea~ed (Ord. 332 - 3/6/75)
Section 26.~)~)C) - repealed (Ord. ~)3Z - 3/6/75)
Mound City Code Section 320:00
Section 320 - Private Structures and Private
Construction Activities on Public Lands
Section 320:00.
Land.
Special Permits for Certain Structures on Public
Subd. 1. Construction on Public Land Permit. Construction of
any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration
of the natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, is
unlawful unless a special construction on public land permit
is issued by the City Council. Any proposed construction,
special use or land alteration shall require the applicant to
provide necessary drawings to scale, specifications of
materials to be used, proposed costs, and purpose for change.
All special permits shall require a survey by a registered
land surveyor before a special permit will be issued. Survey
shall comply with the Mound Building Code survey requirements.
Copies of such surveys, drawings, specifications of materials,
proposed costs and statements of purpose shall be furnished to
the City and kept on file in the city offices. No special
permit shall be issued unless approved by a four-fifths vote
of all the Council members.
Subd. 2. Types of Construction Requirinq a Special
Construction on Public Land Permit. All stairways, retaining
walls, fences, temporary structures, stone work, concrete
forming, or any type of construction shall require a special
permit. No special construction permit shall be issued for
construction of boathouses or other buildings on public land
under Section 320 or any other ordinance of the City.
Subd. 3. Public Land Maintenance Permits. No person shall
maintain any boathouse or other structure on public lands
without first receiving therefor a special maintenance permit
from the City in accordance with this subdivision.
Applications for maintaining existing boathouses or other
structures may be obtained from the Building Inspector at the
City offices. All applications for special maintenance
permits shall be reviewed by the City Council. The Council
shall determine if the maintenance permit shall be granted or
denied, and may order any structure to be removed. Special
permits are required for any maintenance such as maintaining
retaining walls, stonework, concrete or other types of
improvements on public lands. The Council shall have the
right to impose any reasonable conditions it may deem
advisable to protect the public's use of the public shoreline.
All structures, retaining walls, stonework, concrete, or other
improvements on public lands are required to have a public
land maintenance permit from and after April 1, 1976.
4/19/93
Mound City Code Section 320:00, Subd. 4
Subd. 4. Land Alteration. A special land alteration permit
shall be required from the City before any alterations are
made on public lands which would result in any changes to the
following: shoreline, drainage, grade, pitch, slope, trees,
or which require the removal or placement of any fill, or
which eliminates, adds or develops any access road or land.
This section specifically includes any alterations to uses
which are nonconforming on the date this ordinance becomes
effective. No special permit shall be issued unless approved
by a four-fifths vote of all Council members.
Structures located on public lands which are ordered removed
by the City Council or by the City Building Official under any
code or law may proceed under the supervision and direction of
the City Building Official without the n.~cessity for obtaining
removal permits from the City Council. (ORD. #54-1991,
12-23-91)
Subd. 5. Street Excavation Permit Required. Any permit
issued under the provisions of this Section 320 is in addition
to and not in lieu of any street excavation permit which may
be required under the provisions of Section 605.
Subd. 6. Public Lands Procedure Manual. The City Manager and
designated staff are authorized and directed to promulgate a
Public Lands Procedural Manual and to establish necessary
forms and procedures to administer the program and permit
procedures set forth in this Section 320. The manual and
procedures set forth in said manual shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Council by Resolution. The City Council
may amend or change the Public Lands Procedural Manual by
Resolution. (ORD. #62-1993 - 4/19/93)
4/19/93
RESOLUTION NO. 77 - 130
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING RUL$ FOR IMPLEMENTING
MAINTENANCE PERMITS FOR STRUCTURES ON PUBLIC
LANDS RENEWABLE UP TO THREE YEARS CONTINGENT
UPON THE CITY'S USE PLAN NEW OWNERS MAY MAKE
APPLICATION FOR MAINTENANCE PERlViITS - 16A
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND,
SOTA:
That a resolution establishing rulesfor implement'Lng
maintenance permits for structures on Public I~ands
s.nd renewable up to three years contingent upon tl~e
City's Use Plan.
MINNE-
New owners may make application for maintenance
permits - under 16A
:
Adopted by Council this 15th day of March, 1977
(2) Ree[dence
or attached
Port[on
?
][es
Note: All per.its granted'
are for a ll~mit~d tir~, are
non-tramsferable~ and t~e
structure must m~et stat~
building code.
Separa~ 1
Le~l ~eview
No
(3)
N~,~
or Existing
Structures
?
Existing
][es [ or other \
~o . ! courage the use \ les courage the use
Public ,.
Tee / ..... x '/ __ X Negabive
._(,, ~ ~,~-~ , ~) ~ (~) ~ (~)
Reques~ [~ %o ~ ~ [ devel~ P~n ~ to ~ ~ & 3 ~ renewable
~ renewable
· [ [ priorities
Yes
Adopted by Council 3-15-77
I~es. 77-130 changes
this to:
I~enewable up to 3 yrs
:ontingent upon .the
City's use plan, new
~wners ma}- make ap-
plication for mainfen-
ance permits 16A
Res 77-1~1
changes this to:
Establishing rnAi~
tenance permits
for structures on
public lands up
to 3 Trs non-re-
aewahle permits
to be ch~..cked .
annually 16B
I~es 77-132
(1(~)
up to l~x-
non-renewab .le
with propert~
frans fer
RESOLUTION NO. 77 - 131
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE A/vLEND~D.;FLOW
CHART IMPLE/viENTING THE PROCESSING OF
NLAINTENANCE PERNLITS FOR CONSTRUCTION
ON THE COMMONS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND,
SOTA:
That adoption of the amended Flow Ct~art, implementing
the processing of 1V~tenance Permits for construction
on the Commons be authorized.
NiINNE-
Adopted by Council this !.5th day of March, 1977.
RESOLUTION NO. 77 - 132
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE AMENDED FLO~r CHAleT
LMPLEMENTING THE PROCESSING OF MA.~rTENANCE
PEP. MITS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON THE COMMONS
WHEREAS, representative from the Ps-rk Commission presented Flow
Caart for.. Council approval, an4
WHEi{EAS, Council amended 16A and i6B of s.aid Flov~ Caa~t
NOV;, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COLrNCIL OF
MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA:
That the amended Flow Chart, implementing the processing
of l~faintenance Permits for c6nstruction on tl%e Cornnuons be
adopted.
Said amended changes refer to 16A Res. 77-130 and
16B Res. 77-131.
Adopted by Council this 15th day of March, 1977.
April 27, 1993
RESOLUTION ~93-52
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT A PUBLIC LARDS PROCEDUI~E MANUAL
FOR THE PROCESSING OF PERMITS FOR PRIVATE STRUCTURES AND
PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON PUBLIC LANDS
WHEREAS, certain public lands were dedicated for the
public and the City is a trustee whose duty is to devote those
lands for the public purposes intended by the dedicator; and,
WHEREAS, On March 15, 1977 the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 77-130, 77-131, and 77-132, establishing rules for
implementing maintenance permits for structures on public lands
contingent upon the City's Use Plan, and
WHEREAS, on April 13, 1993 the City Council adopted
Ordinance #62-1993 amending Mound City Code Section 320 by adding
Subd. 6. authorizing the City Manager and staff to promulgate a
Public Lands Procedure Manual to be approved by the City Council by
Resolution, and
WHEREAS, staff has formulated a procedure manual to
facilitate a consistent and orderly review process for public land
permits, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, to adopt the Public Lands Procedure
Manual as presented, dated April 20, 1993.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Jessen and seconded by Councilmember Johnson.
The following voted in the affirmative:
Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following voted
Ahrens.
Attest: City Clerk
in the negative.:
1/95)
Inventory of Structures/Encroachments on Public Shoreland
Stairways ............. . ...................................... 82
Electric .................................................... 39
bug light 1
28
31
2
outlets
lights
Iow volt
Natural Gas Light
Land Alterations
Walkway .................................................. 10
Barbecue
Fire Ring ................................................... 2
Water Pump ................................................ 6
Vegetation ................................................. 16
shrubs 2 (obstructing access)
trees 2 (obstructing dock site)
garden 8
trimming
Retaining Walls
Fuse Box
Wishing Well
Drain, Roof
Buildings ................................................... 12
guest house
boat houses 4
sheds
boat ramp/shelter 1
Flag Poles
Winch Pole
Hammock Pole
Fences
Decks
Platforms
Riprap ..................................................... 1
Holding Tank
Sea Wall
Plumbing ................................................... 2
Horse Shoe Pit
Phone Jack
Bird House and Pole · 1
Bird Feeder and Pole
Clothesline Pole
INDIVIDUAL ENCROACHMENTS
................................. 258
PROCEDURE MANUAL - Public Land Permits
Exhibit J
Page 1 of $
Guidelines for Writing Staff Reports
for Public Land Permits
Staff reports shall be written according to applicable ordinances, regulations, and policies,
including:
- Use Plan
Comprehensive Plan
. · Shoreland Management Ordinance (City Code Section 350:1200)
- "Policy for Structures on Public Lands" adopted by Resolution No. 93-142 on October
26, 1993
Recommendations for permissible uses, according to the Decision Flow Chart, such as stairways,
retaining walls, land alterations, etc., will be based on the following:
a. If a structure is in good condition and meets the building code, staff will recommend to
the City Council permit approval for 5 years.
b. If a structure is in good condition but does not meet building code, staff will recommend
approval and the structure must comply with code within the time specified by the City
Council and dock permit will not be issued until structure meets code. If structure is not
corrected or removed within time specified by City Council that dock site will be exempt
from dock license issuance. The permit holder for that structure must remove or correct
the structure at their expense, if not, the City will attempt to abate through legal
channels.
c. If a structure is in hazardous condition taft will recommend removal or correction
immediately. The Site Holder's Dock License will not be issued until structure meets
code. The dock site will be reserved for the that dock site holder until the structure is
corrected, however, the dock will not receive it's license.
Recommendations for uses inconsistent with the Decision Flow Chart and other applicable
regulations shall be reviewed on a' case by case basis. Recommendations will be for termination,
amortization, removal, and restoration to natural condition, as applicable in the Use Plan.
Buildings or other structure require separate legal review, and the following information should
be assembled: pertinent facts, history, existing conditions, current photos, and a draft report.
This information should be submitted to the City Manager and City Attorney for review, when
necessary.
- 77 -
PROCEDURE MANUAL - Public Land PetTnits
Guidelines for Writing Staff Reports
for Public l.~nd Permits. cont.
Exhibit J
Page 2 of 3
ao
bo
~. All new stairways shall be constructed according to the Uniform
Building Code standards for residential stairways.
.Existing Stairways. All stairways existing upon the date of the adoption of this
Procedure Manual (4-27-93) and that are not deemed structurally unsafe or otherwise
unsafe by the Building Official are considered legal nonconforming uses. Legal
nonconforming uses may have their use continued according to the permit procedures,
provided such continued use is not dangerous to life.
_Alterations or Repairs to Existing Stairway. Alterations or repairs may be made to any
stairway without requiring the whole stairway to comply with the building code, provided
the alteration or repair conforms to that required for a new stairway.
Maintenance of Stairways and Other Structures. All stairways, both existing and new,
and all parts thereof, shall be maintained in a safe condition. The person to which the
permit is issued is responsible for all maintenance. Minor maintenance of any currently
permitted stairway, dock storage platform, or retaining wall can be done without a
permit, but must have prior approval of the Building Official. The Building Official shall
inspect and approve such repairs.
Correction Orders. All stairways or parts thereof that are determined to be unsafe by
the Building Official shall be issued a correction order to be abated by repair or removal.
Electrical: All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by a
qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the State Electrical
Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed installation. A scaled site plan
must be submitted showing in detail the location of all electrical services on the public land.
Ail power supply to the abutting property must be disconnected by a qualified electrical
contractor until such work is approved by the City Council. The applicant must verify
disconnection with staff.
Expiration Date for Permits' All permits, for each property, will be made to expire
concurrently.
Minor Maintenance- Minor maintenance of any currently permitted existing stairway, dock
storage platform, or retaining wall can be repaired without a permit with approval by the
Building Official, Parks Director, or Dock Inspector. The Dock Inspector currently writes
correction orders for minor items such as loose treads, handrails, or replacement of boards on
docks. The Building Official is to be copied on all correction orders regarding building code
items.
~-ev. !/27i94)
- 78 -
PROCEDURE MANUAL - Public Land Permits
Guidelines for Writing Staff Report~
for Public l~and Permits, cont.
Exhibit J
Page 3 of 3
~ Platforms (one edge on-grade) for the use of dock storage, not exceeding 4' x 8',
consistent with the Shorcland Management Ordinance at 32 square feet, are allowable on Class
A and C Common areas only, due to steep slope and nontraversibility.
o
10.
11.
12,
13,
Riprap:. Riprapping of the shoreline on Lake Minnetonka that is below the 100 year floodplain
elevation of 931 is regulated by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and below the
Ordinary High Water Elevation of 929.5 is regulated by the Department of Natural Resources.
Permits are required from these agencies before a Public Lands Permit can be granted by the
City of Mound.
Seawalls:. Basically the same as fiprapping (above). Refer to the Shoreland Management
Ordinance for more regulations.
Vegetation Alterations and Trimming: Refer to the Shoreland Management Ordinance.
Guidelines for Plantings: Pending City
Retaining Walls: Should guidelines be
Council approval,
established?
(rev. !/27194)
- 79 -
P~t~ltW JL~UAr, - Public Lend
DEC.ION PLOW
I~P~IMG ~ ~SZNG OF SP~ p~ FOR
S~U~ ~O ~VA~ ~HS~u~IoN A~I~TI~ ON ~BLlc
(~O BY Cl~ ~OE SR~ZON 220)
~C~l~ '~UBLIC ~D (1)
Exhibi C
LEGAL REVI KY
(:3)
CONSTRUCTION OR
PUBLIC ~S (nay)
LAJ~ ALT£1tATION
(Bradtng, racatntnt
R.EqU~$T.
DL'7~Y
REQUEST.
D~3~Y ILQL~S?.
DEVELOp ~
ACCO~I)ll~ TO
PtlORITIL~.
/ I aous£ oR OTHER
BUI~LNG?
(9) IV XLL THE REqb'EST
ENJ~J~C£ ~D
~S BY
P~LIC ~ DEFIN~
~ USE
~ ~E Cl~ ~(11)
~l~ Ol
DOES PROPOSED T]'IPROVE~ZNT t (3.5)
R~:C~UIRE APPROVAL FItOH
AROTHER AGENCY? IF TES,
~ECEIV~ APPROVAL FROM AGEMCT
THIN PROCEED.
(7)
TES
(5)
TI~ USE OF THE PUBLIC
I.AJ(DS BT THE CF~qL'RAL
PUBLIC AS DEFINED BT
T~ USE PXIAJ(?
i(10)
NO
giLL THE ~EQUF. S? I(12)
R~SUL? IN A
NE~ATIV£ XHTACT
ON ~E USE
~ YES
- 9 -
October 26, 1993
RESOLUTION NO. 93-142
RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE POLICY ON STAIRWAYS
ON PUBLIC LANDS AS SUBMITTED
WIIEREAS, at the October 12, 1993, Council Meeting, the Building Official asked for
direction from the City Council on existing stairways on public lands as they relate to the
Building Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council discussed the above and asked the Building Official to
draw a policy which would say:
1. New stairways shall meet the Uniform Building Code and the standards.
Existing stairways shall be considered legal nonconforming uses unless they are
structurally unsafe (a percentage to be determined by the Building Official). As
long as they are safe, permits will continue and be considered a legal
nonconforming use. If the stairways are replaced, they have to meet the new
standards. If they are unsafe based upon the criteria set, then they have to be
replaced at the time of the appli,'ation. The Council directed the Building Official
to write the criteria.
WHEREAS, the Building Official presented the proposed policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following policy and it is to be incorporated into the Policy
& Procedure Manual for Structures on Public Lands:
Policy for Structures on Public Lands
New Stairways. All new stairways shall be constructed according to the Uniform
Building Code standards for residential stairways.
Existing Stairways. All stairways existing upon the date of the adoption of this
Procedure Manual (4-27-93) and that are not deemed structurally unsafe or otherwise
unsafe by the Building Official are considered legal nonconforming uses. Legal
nonconforming uses may have their use continued according to the permit procedures,
provided such continued use is not dangerous to life.
Alterations or Repairs to Existing Stairways. Alterations or repairs may be made to any
stairway without requiring the whole stairway to comply with the building code, provided
the alteration or repair conforms to that required for a new stairway.
October 26, 1993
Maintenance of Stairways and Other Structures. All stairways, both existing and new,
and all parts thereof, shall be maintained in a safe condition. The person to which the
permit is issued is responsible for all maintenance. Minor maintenance of any currently
permitted stairway, dock storage platform, or retaining wall can be done without a
permit, but must have prior approval of the Building Official. The Building Official shall
inspect and approve such repairs.
Correction Orders. All stairways or parts thereof that are determined to be unsafe by
the Building Official shall be issued a correction order to be abated by repair or removal.
The forgoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Ahrens and seconded by
Councilmember Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in tile affirmative:
Ahrens, Jensen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in tile negative:
none.
Councihnember Jessen was absent and excused.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
339
PROPOSED RESOLUTION //94-
RESOLUTION TO AMEND
THE PUBLIC LANDS PROCEDURE MANUAL
ADDING "EXHIBIT Q"
GUIDELINES FOR ALLOWING PLANTINGS ON PUBLIC SHORELAND
WHEREAS, City Code Section 320:00, Subd. 6. requires that the Public Lands
Procedure Manual be reviewed and approved by the City Council by Resolutions, and
that the City Council may amend or change the manual by resolution, and;
WitEREAS, while processing public land permit applications, the Park and Open
Space Commission found it difficult to review issues pertaining to plantings on the
public shoreland, and therefore, developed the subject guidelines, and;
WHEREAS, the Goal is: "To maintain the public shoreland in a manner
consistent with its intended use, is environmentally friendly, and best meets the needs
of all residents, and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to amend the Public Lands Procedure Manual, adding "Exhibit Q",
Guidelines for Allowing Plantings on Public Shoreland, as attached.
~,Roc~,o~ .~.~ _ vub~z~ ~.~a v.,~ze~ Exhibit
City of Mound Parks and Open Space Commission
Guidelines for AIIowin Plantin s on Public Shoreland
1. Plantings should not interfere with the free, easy and open traversing of the public shoreland.
2. Plantings should not give the appearance that the public shoreland is privately owned or that
access is restricted to the general public.
3. Plantings should be introduced, maintained and administered in such a manner that protect the
environment, wildlife, and lake from any damage or loss of use and solely at the requestor's
responsibility, risk and expense, and removed imrnediately if so directed by the City of Mound
at the requestor's sole responsibility, risk and expense if found to be inconsistent with these
guidelines.
Non-native plant species are discouraged, but in any event, should not be closer than forty (40)
feet of the ordinary high water level (929.4 for Lake Minnetonka).
5. Plant species:
bo
Co
Plants should not pose a danger of overrunning naturally occurring native species or
other already authorized plantings.
Introduction of species should not create a hazard, unsafe or unlivable environment for
wildlife that naturally inhabits the subject public shoreland area.
Species should not increase risk of health problems or be injurious to the public.
No species should be authorized that are classified as noxious weeds, fruit/vegetable
bearing plants, or species that would attract unusually excessive amounts of harmful
insects to the area.
So
Naturally occurring native species are the preferred choice on the public shoreland, such
as:
Trees:
Shrubs:
Ground Covers:
Bur Oak White Pine
Sugar Maple Aspen
Mountain Ash Basswood
Elm Birch
Gray Dogwood Hazel
Pagoda Dogwood Viburnum
Wild Geranium Aster
Violets Lady Ferns
Columbine Solomon's Seal
fREV. 12/9/94)
February 22, 1994
RESOLUTION i~J4-28
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE
SPECIAL PERMITS TO ALLOW PRIVATE STRUCTURES ON PUBLIC LAND
ACCORDING TO "BATCH #2"
WHEREAS, the City of Mound is updating the permits for structures located on public
lands, and;
WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a four-fifths vote for
Construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour ol
any public way, park, or commons, and;
WHEREAS, the Park and Open Space Commission reviewed these permits aru:l
recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. To approve Public Land Permits for "Batch #2' as shown on the attached Exhibit A, subject to
the following conditions:
a. The permits will expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval, unless
otherwise noted in the 'Comments' column on 'Batch #2' (EXHIBIT 'A' attached).
b. The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
c. Repairs to stairways, and the related erosion control measures be made as required by
the Building Official and Parks Director.
d. If compliance to these conditions has not been achieved within one year of the date of
approval of the Permit, the applicant's dock license will not be issued until compliance has
been achieved.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Ahrens, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none,
Attest: City Clerk
Councilmember Jensen was absent and excused.
February 22, 1994 Resolution ~V94-28
EXHIBIT "A"
Batch #2
Public Land Permits
DOCK ABUi liNG ADDRESS PRIVAii= ADDmONAL
SITE STRUCTURE CONDITIONS
02605 1580 HERON LANE STAIRWAY
02635 1580 HERON LANE STAIRWAY
02665 1580 HERON LANE STAIRWAY
02695 1601 PARADISE LANE STAIRWAY
02720 1601 PARADISE LANE STAIRWAY
02750 1601 PARADISE LANE STAIRWAY
02780 1601 PARADISE LANE STAIRWAY
02870 END OF THREE PTS. STAIRWAY
BLVD.
02900 END OF THREE PTS. STAIRWAY
BLVD.
02930 END OF THREE PTS. STAIRWAY
BLVD.
10310 1779 WILDHURST LANE BIRD HOUSE 3 YEAR NON-RENEWABLE
PERMIT.
10520 1745 WlLDHURST LANE STAIRWAY
12490 1733 GULL LANE RETAINING WALLS
12580 1724 FINCH LANE STAIRWAY
13090 1729 DOVE LANE STAIRWAY,
TIMBER
13300 1737 CANARY LANE STAIRWAY
13390 1736 BLUEBIRD LANE STAIRWAY, AND THE GARDEN AREA IS NOT
RETAINING WALL INCLUDED IN THIS APPROVAL
]. ] 5
April 26, 1994
RESOLUTION #94-58
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE
SPECIAL PERMITS TO ALLOW PRIVATE STRUCTURES ON PUBLIC LAND
"BATCH #3"
PEABODY LANE, WATERSIDE COMMON,
LONGFORD ROAD, AND EXCELSIOR LANE
WHEREAS, the City of Mound is updating the permits for structures located on public
lands, and;
WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a four-fifths vote for
Construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of
any public way, park, or commons, and;
WHEREAS, the Park and Open Space Commission reviewed these permits and
recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. To approve Public Land Permits for "Batch #3" as shown on the attached Exhibit A, subject to
the following conditions:
a. Unless otherwise noted in the "Comments/Recommendation" column on the attached
"Batch #3", permits shall be approved according to (14) on the Decision Flow Chart,
"Grant Permit up to 5 Years and Renewable."
b. The permits will expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval.
c. The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
d. All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by a qualified
licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the State Electrical Inspector.
The City Council must first approve of the proposed installation. A scaled site plan must
be submitted showing in detail the location of all electrical services on the public land. All
power supply to the abutting property must be properly disconnected until such work is
approved by the City Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Smith and seconded by
Counciimember Ahrens.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Ahrens, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
:i. 16
April
26, 1994
Councilmember Jensen was absent and excused.
Attest: City Clerk
Mayor /~/'~
EXHIBIT A
Batch #3
Public Land Permits
PEABODY STREET, CLASS D
20050 5500 BREEZY ROAD WOOD/TIMBER APPROVE. CONDITION IS SOUND.
Michael Kraemer STAIRWAY
22180
23150
WATERSIDE COMMONS, CLASS D
2137 ASHLAND LANE
Beverly Vanlaanen
2163 FAIRVIEW LANE
Sharon Weber
30450 4832 LONGFORD RD
Richard Carlson
MISC. PLANTINGS &
TREES
BRICK FIRE RING
LONGFORD ROAD, CLASS C
ELECTRIC OUTLET APPROVE.
& PUMP REMOVE.
APPROVE. DO NOT BLOCK ACCESS OR INCREASE
SIZE. (Park Commission is reviewing policy for plantings)
OWNER SHALL RELOCATE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY. '
VERIFY TO CODE. UPDATE TO CODE, OR
32040 ! ~7onOOI::)S. rHH~A~NNON LANE I ~EL~ TO CODE. UPDATE TO CODE, OR
REMOVE.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION g95-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE
SPECIAL PERMITS FOR PRIVATE STRUCTURE ON PUBLIC LAND
KNOWN AS STRATFORD LANE
"BATCH//4"
DOCK SITES #32670, 33407, 33487, 33525
WHEREAS, The City of Mound is updating the permits for structures located on public
lands, and;
WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a four-fifths vote
for Construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the
natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, and;
WIIEREAS, "Batch #4" details the private encroachments located at dock sites 32670,
33407, 33487, and 33525, and these encroachments have been inspected by the Building Official
and Dock Inspector according to the Procedure Manual, and;
WHEREAS, the Park and Open Space Commission reviewed this request and
recommended approval, with conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
To approve Public Land Permits for "Batch #4" as follows:
Unless otherwise noted in the "Comments/Recommendation" column on the
attached "Batch #3", permits shall be approved according to (14) on the Decision
Flow Chart, "Grant Permit up to 5 Years."
b. The permits will expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval.
c. The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by
a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the State
Electrical Inspector. The City Council must fu'st approve of the proposed
installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location
of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting
property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City
Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff.
Proposed Resolution, Batch//4
February 28, 1995
Page 2
Batch #4
Public Land Permits
Park and Open Space Commission 2-9-95
DOCK SIT~
32670
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS D
ABUT"rING ADDRESS
4594 DENBIGH ROAD
KEVIN RUDEK
ENCROACHMENT
- STORAGE SHED
WITH ELECTRIC
LIGHT ATTACHED
TO IT.
COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
SHED AND LIGHT HAVE ALREADy BEEN REMOVED.
REMOVE FOUNDATION BY JUNE 30, 1995.
DOCK SITE
33407
4466 DENBIGH ROAD
RODNEY BEYSTROM
- ELECTRIC LIGHT REMOVE OR RELOCATE LIGHT ONTO PRIVATE
PROPERTY.
- OUTLET
APPROVE OUTLET - VERIFY STATE ELECTRICAL
INSPECTION COMPLETED.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS C
ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
DOCK SITE
33487 4452 DENBIGH ROAD
JACK COOK
33525 44~5 DENBIGH ROAD
MARK HANUS
The foregoing resolution
seconded by Councilmember
- RETAINING WALL
- BOAT RANIP WITH
ELECTRIC MOTOR
- POLE
was moved by
REMOVE RETAINING WALL AND BOAT RAMP FROM
PUBLIC LAND BY JUNE 30, 1995, AS AGREED BETWEEN
THE PARKS DIRECTOR AND JACK COOK.
REMOVE POLE FROM PUBLIC LAND AT CITY'S
EXPENSE.
Councilmember
and
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 9, 1995
PUBLIC LAND PERMITS: BATCH #4
City staff is in the process of updating permits for encroachments on public lands as
directed by the City Council. Special perm,ts are required for private structures
located on public lands as specified in City Code Section 320.
"Batch #~," details the private encroachments located at dock sites 32670, 33zt07,
33z~87, and 33525. These encroachments have been inspected by the Building
Official and Dock Inspector according to the Procedure Manual.
Staff recommended approval of Public Land Permits for "Batch #4", as follows:
1. Unless otherwise noted in the -Comments/Recommendation" column on the
attached "Batch #~", permits shall be approved according to (1~) on the
Decision Flow Chart, "Grant Permit up to 5 Years."
2. The permits will expire five (51 years from the date of City Counci[ approval.
3. The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
4. All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by
a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the
State Electrical Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed
installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location
of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting
property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City
Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff.
Batch #4
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS D
~ ABUTTING ADDRESS COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
~ I
32670 4594 DENBIGH ROAD . STORAGE SHED REMOVE OR RELOCATE SHED WITH LIGHT. SHED tS
KEVIN RUDEK WITH ELECTRIC DILAPIDATED.
LIGHT ATTACHED
[ ~ TO ~T.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS A
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
33407 4466 DENBIGH ROAD ~ ~ON I TENT WITH UID INE .
RODNEY BEYSTROM . OUTLET APPROVE OUTLET - VERIFY STATE ELECTRICAL
INSPECTION COMPLETED.
I=~~~~TRATFORD LANE, CLASS C
COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
DOCK SITE ~
33487 4452 DENBIGH ROAD - RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL REQUIRES PRIOR WATERSHED
JACK COOK APPROVAL.
- BOAT RAMP WITH REMOVE BOAT RAMP, PORTION ON PUBLIC LANDS.
ELECTRIC MOTOR NOTE SURVEYS.
33525 4446 DENBIGH ROAD - POLE REMOVE/RELOCATE POLE ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
MARK HANUS
Parle an~ Open Space Commission Minutes
Feb~y 9, 1995
A. #32670, KEVIN RUDEK
Staff indicated that the shed and light have been removed, only the shed foundation
remains, and this is expected to be removed. Staff suggested the foundation be
removed by June 30, 1995.
B. #33407, RODNEY BEYSTROM
Mr. Beystrom explained the history of how and why the electrical was installed. He
stated that it was there when he purchased the house, and he converted the existing
services to an outlet and light and had it inspected by the Electrical Inspector at that
time.
Regarding the light, Mr. Beystrom explained that he has reviewed the City's Guidelines
for Lights on Public Shoreland, and he feels a light should be permitted for safety
reasons because he has a very steep hill. The commission discussed the possibility
of moving the light back onto private property. The applicant was agreeable.
MOTION made by Casey, seconded by Steinbring, to recommend
approval of the following Public Land Permits, as recommended by staff:
Dock Site #32670, 4594 Denbigh Road, Kevin Rudek:
Remove or relocate shed and light.
Dock Site #33407, 4446 Denbigh Road, Rodney Beystrom:
Remove or relocate light. Approve outlet - verify state
electrical inspection completed.
Motion carried unanimously.
C. #33487, JACK COOK
The Parks Director indicated that half of the subject retaining wall has already been
removed, and that the applicant has agreed to remove the balance of the retaining wall
and the boat ramp.
MOTION made by Goode, seconded by Darling to recommend approval
of staff's recommendation to remove the boat ramp and retaining wall by
June 30, 1995, as agreed between Jack Cook and the Parks Director.
Motion carried unanimously.
D. #33525, MARK HANUS
A letter which was received by the applicant, Mark Hanus, was read out loud by Chair
Schmidt.
.ga& and Open Space Commission Minutes
February 9, 199§
'RE: Clothesline poles on city property adjacent to '!.~.~6 Denbigh Road
I am unable to attend the Park and Open Space Commission meeting of 9 February
$5. I understand you will be discussing the clothesline poles that are near my property.
Since I am unable to attend, I just wanted to indicate my position on this issue.
It is unknown who instal/ed these, but it is obvious upon
inspection that it was many year~ ago.
I do not use these for any purpose and have no desire to
maintain them.
/ do not own them and never had an interest in them.
I have not been responsible in any way for these poles in
the past. Consequently, I will not assume responsibility
for them in the future. They were there many years
before I moved to Mound.
My only connection to these po/es is that I moved into the
property next to them and hold a dock site near the po/es.
If the city wishes, they are most welcome to remove
these poles whenever they desire.
If the city chooses to remove the poles, care must be used. There is a property
iron very near one of the poles. The poles are set in concrete and it is possible that either
the extraction of the pole or the equipment used for this purpose may disturb the location
of the property iron. The location of the property line is critical due to tensions with my
neighbor. If the location of this iron is disturbed by the extraction of the poles, I would
require the city have a registered surveyor relocate it to prevent any future problem. I do
not want a parks employee to reposition it. This would not be legal anyway. To ensure
the proper handling of this matter I would need to have notice as to when the work would
be performed.
Thank you. I hope this explains my position adequately."
The Parks Director explained that if the City agrees to remove the pole, this could set
a precedence for the City to remove other structures in the future, which may be
much larger and more costly to remove. It has been the City's view that the
encroachments are the responsibility of the abutting owner.
Ahrens confirmed that this area was realized to be public land only about 4 years ago,
and that if the City owns the property, they should take care of the encroachment.
Goode thinks the City needs a policy to determine who is responsible for the removal
or maintenance of existing encroachments. Darling agreed.
Ahrens noted that she believes a precedence has already been set to have the City
remove these encroachments; last year the City removed a retaining wall and a
stairway off the commons when the abutting owners refused responsibility.
Fackler explained that abutting owners should assume the responsibility of those
encroachments which were created by them, such as placement of sod or installation
of retaining walls. If the City did not create the encroachment, they should not be
responsible.
Park and Open Space Commission Minutes
February 9, I995
Goode reiterated that Hanus did not know this was public land when he bought the
house, and the pole was existing when he purchased the property, so she feels the
Cit~/should be responsible for the removal of the pole.
Casey commented that they do not know who installed the poles, and the City should
be responsible for prior encroachments. There is no evidence that the applicant has
maintained this encroachment, and we did not catch the person who originally
installed the pole. With a prior structure, he does not see how the City can make Mr.
Hanus remove it.
Goode agreed with Casey, and commented that she believes it would be less costly,
in the long run, to have the City remove the encroachments.
Byrnes suggested that the pole be sawed off at the base, and this would not disturb
the property marker.
Darling commented that he agrees with Casey, and he does not feel this issue is any
different than if someone planted a tree in the street, then sold the house, and the
next person has to remove it.
Peter Meyer stated that considering how minor of an encroachment this is, it was not
worth as much time as they have spent discussing it.
MOTION made by Darling, seconded by Goode, to recommend that the
clothesline pole be removed, at the City's expense, from Dock Site
#33525, abut"ting ~.~.~16 Denbigh Road. Motion carried unanimously.
These recommendations will be reviewed by the City Council on February 28, 1995.
CITY OF MOUND
STAFF REPORT
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
DATE:
January 3, 1995
MEETING
DATE:
February 9, 1995
Park & Open Space Cc'~mission
TO'
Park and Open Space Commission and Applicant
FROM:
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Jim Fackler, Parks Director
Tom McCaffrey, Dock Inspector
SUBJECT: Update of Public Land Permits - "Batch #4"
Dock Sites #32670 - #42586
Background/Comments.
City staff is in the process of updating permits for encroachments on public lands as
directed by the City Council. Special permits are required for private structures
located on public lands as specified in City Code Section 320.
Please find attached "Batch #4", this is a listing of dock sites that have private
structures such as stairways, lights, or some other type of encroachment, located on
public lands. These encroachments have been inspected by the Building Official and
Dock Inspector according to the Procedure Manual.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the Public Land Permits as listed on the attached
"Batch #4", as follows'
Unless otherwise noted in the "Comments/Recommendation" column on the
attached "Batch #4", permits shall be approved according to (14) on the
Decision Flow Chart, "Grant Permit up to 5 Years."
January 3, 1995
Batch #4
Page 2
Note:
meeting. Please call Jon Sutherland or Jim Facl<ler if you have any questions.
refer to the Flow Char~ and Use Plan for discussion.
The permits will expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval.
The permits must be renewed with change in dock license holder.
Ail electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by
a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the
State Electrical Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed
installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location
of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting
property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City
Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff.
files and photographs are available at City Hall and will be on hand at the
Please
pJ
enclosure
(The abutting owners and dock site holders have been notified, The recommendation from the Park and
Open Space Commission will be heard by the City Council on February 28, 1995.)
;vised 2/9/95
Batch #4
Public Land Permits
Park and Open Space Commission 2/9/95
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS D I
DOCK SITE ABU3-FING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
32670 4594 DENBIGH ROAD - STORAGE SHED REMOVE OR RELOCATE SHED WITH LIGHT. SHED IS
KEVIN RUDEK WITH ELECTRIC DILAPIDATED.
LIGHT ATTACHED
TO IT.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS A
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
4466 DENBIGH ROAD - ELECTRIC LIGHT REMOVE LIGHT - INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES.
~3407 RODNEY BEYSTROM
- OUTLET APPROVE OUTLET - VERIFY STATE ELECTRICAL
INSPECTION COMPLETED.
STRATFORD LANE, CLASS C
DOCK SITE ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
33487 4452 DENBIGH ROAD - RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL REQUIRES PRIOR WATERSHED
JACK COOK APPROVAL.
- BOAT RAMP WITH REMOVE BOAT RAMP, PORTION ON PUBLIC LANDS.
ELECTRIC MOTOR NOTE SURVEYS.
33525 4446 DENBIGH ROAD - POLE REMOVE/RELOCATE POLE ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY.
MARK HANUS
(47)
3 % /'.! ~ tq ' ° ° "'°
9 11 23
-- -- 'GOVT LOTS 3 & 5
BUILDING PERMIT
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
DEN~iGH ROAD
STREET ADDRESS 4594 ESTIMATED VALUE $ X
LOT 7 & 3 BLOCK 3 PID 19-117-23 31 0007
ADDITION AVALON PLAT # 3 7 $5 0
OWNER KEVIN RU'DEK PHONE (W)
ADDRESS PHONE (H)
CONTRACTOR LIC. #
ADDRESS PHONE
r..-" !059S
571-5555
DESCRIPTION OFWORK D~,[OLITION OF SHED AND DOCKS LOCATED ON TqE ADJACENT PUBLIC LAND
"STRATFOR.D LANE"
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS
ZONING DISTRICT
ZONING COMMENTS
PERMITAPPROVAL SUBJECT TO RESOLUTION#
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON
CORRESPONDING GENERAL PERMIT #
(SAC, DRAINTILE, PLUMBING. MECHANICAL. ETC.)
NOTICE; Separate permits me required for elecmcal, plumbing, heating.
ventilation or air conditioning. This pen'nit becomes null and void if work or
consm~c~on authorizes is not commenceS within 180 days, or if
¢~qslnJc~Jon or work is suspended or aJ3andoneS for a period o! 180 days
at any t~mo after work is commenced.
I hefeb3t ,"~f§~, that I have road and examined ~'tis application and know
~e same to be InJe and correct. All I:x'ov~sione of law~ and cih, o~Jinanceq
governing Ibis type of wo~ will be complied wt~ whether speci§ed herein
~' not. The granang of a permi! does not presume to give aul~3rity ~
violate or cancel ~e provisions of any ol~'ler state of I¢~aJ law regulating
conslnJC~Jon or the performance of consl3'uclJofl.
PERMIT FEE (BASE) ...................................
PLAN CHECK FEE ...................................... $
LESS PAID PLAN CHECK ........................... $ (
(UOC Sec~,~n
SURCHARGE .............................................. $
ESCROW DEPOSIT ....................................$,
DRAINTILE ................................................... $
S.A.C. (MWCC) ............................................ $
(76-2304. g9'%, 7~-37'74.1%)
CITY SEWER CONNECTION ..................... $
CITY WATER CONNECTION ......................
WATER METER ...........................................
STATIONARY ROD ...................................... $
OTHER ......................................................... $
TOTAL .......................................................... $
DATE:
DATE:
M.A.
01-3251
01-3253
) 01-3253
01-3251
01-2222
01-2300
01-3254
78-2304
78-3158
73-3155
73-3744
73-3842
N.mo
10696
,e ~'5 -WO
04 ?% ·
· IJ.9
4
RECEIVED
" OCT ~ ~
Shoroline LocaC£on
for Jack Cook
Iiennop~n ~nun~y, Hknnoso~a
Hennep~n County, N~nn~;n~n, .ln~ ~.hat part.
o[ vac~eH Strnt~flr~ [~fl,. ari~ninin~ na~d
This ~urv~y shows LI,. ~(~:.~tion n[h wood
descr~ ~roper~v. r~ Hoos no~ ~tt:por~
~o shov ~n~ ~h~ imprOV~t-nt~ o~ ~flc~o~ch-
merits.
MINNEHAHA CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT /
14600 Minnetonka Boulevard
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597 ~lr~,..-. ~ ~.:.j
office: (612) 939-8320 fax: (612) 9398244 ~K~ ..mrro.r~ ..
/
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR: ~llen B. Sones
March 8, 1994
P~nit Application No. 94-3!:
Applicant:
Mr. Jack Cook
4452 Denbigh Road
Mound, MN 55364
Location:
City of Mound, Tl17, R23, Sec. 19, NE 1/4
Purpose:
Placement of beach sandblanket.
Dear Mr. Cook:
At the regularly scheduled February 24, 1994 meeting of the Board of Managers, the subject permit
application was reviewed along with the following exhibits:
Permit Application 94-31 received February 3, 1994.
Site plan received February 3, 1994.
Typical cross section received February 3, 1994.
Action was taken denying your permit application for the following reason:
1. Outstanding violation concerning the placement of a timberwall and fill within the floodplain
of Lake Minnetonka on the subject property.
Please note that the matter concerning a violation of the District's floodplain alteration rule would need to
be resolved before the Board of Managers would consider granting any District permits that involve work
on the subject property.
Please note further that a new permit application with exhibits would need to be submitted at this time along
with documentation from the City of Mound which allows for the placement of a sandblanket on public
commons property. The District would also need to verify that the outstanding violation had been resolved.
Sincerely,
Ellen B. Sones
District Administrator
C.'
Jim Faclder, City of Mound
Jim Smith, Concept Landscaping
application pending receipt and staff approval of a plan which
provides for compensatory floodplain storage. Upon vote, the
motion carried unanimously.
~94-31, Jack Cook -- Placement of beach sandblanket.
Mr. Syverson reviewed the permit application, noting that
there is an outstanding violation concerning Jack Cook which
involves the placement of a retaining wall and fill within the
floodplain of Lake Minnetonka without a District permit. Mr.
Syverson noted that the District had recently received a letter
from Mr. Cook stating that he will remove the wall and all fill
before June 1st of this year.
Manager Love stated that it was his understanding the
violation concerning the wall and fill was located on city commons
property and suggested that the city of Mound and the District
reach an agreement as to how to proceed before the Managers
consider whether to grant a permit for the placement of the
sandblanket.
It was moved by Manager Lindley, seconded by Manager Blixt, to
deny the permit application due to an outstanding violation
concerning the applicant and request that the applicant contact the
city to resolve the violation and receive approval for the
placement of a sandblanket on city commons property prior to
applying for a sandblanket permit with the District. Upon vote,
the motion carried unanimously.
Administrator's Report
Ms. Sones reported that she had attended a meeting at the
Minneapolis Park Board and noted that the Park Board and the City
of Minneapolis would like to focus on a work plan and joint
agreements between the agencies involved. Ms. Sones stated that
Park Board staff will be focusing on how to address the concerns
that were raised by certain individuals from the Linden Hills
neighborhood at a community meeting that focussed on the proposed
Lake Calhoun water quality treatment pond.
Ms. Sones reported that she had met with a Twin Lake's Task
Force group which is composed of property owners that reside within
the Twin Lakes subwatershed and who are concerned about the current
condition of Twin Lake. Ms. Sones noted that she will be meeting
with the group on an ongoing basis.
Ms. Sones stated that the public advisory group for the Long
Lake Improvement project had held their first meeting. Ms. Sones
noted that the group appeared to be very interested in water
quality improvements to the lake and in the overall project.
#C1K) ~loard #i~u~es 8
C 2/2&/P&)
· -..- ...o;,.
{rev. 2-15-S5J
Schedule
for
Public Land Permits
Batch # Dock Sites # Cases Report Due Park City Council
Meeting
5 40995-41227 6 2-14-95 3-9-95 4-25-95
6 41272-42086 6 4-18-95 5-11-95 5-23-95
7 42129-42351 6 5-16-95 6-8-95 6-27-95
8 42406-42626 6 6-20-95 7-13-95 7-25-95
9 42691-43120 6 7-18-95 8-10-95 8-22-95
10 43180-43575 6 8-22-95 9-14-95 9-26-95
11 43647-43882 6 9-19-95 10-12-95 10-24-95
12 43942-44408 6 10-17-95 11-9-95 11-28-95
13 50640-51105 6 11-14-95 12-14-95 1-9-96
1996
14 51135-51495 6 12-19-95 1-11-96 1-23-96
15 51555-61215 9 1-16-96 2-8-96 2-27-96
16 610-1150 6 2-20-96 3-14-96 3-26-96
17 1170-1900 6 3-19-96 4-11-96 4-23-96
18 1920-2250 8 4-16-96 5-9-96 5-28-96
19 2635-2930 6 5-21-96 6-13-96 6-25-96
MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING - FEBRUARY 21, 1995
Other business discussed was the idea of bringing back the crosswalk at the House
of Moy and taking a look at the existing crosswalk at the Pond Arena. This matter
was presented by Mayor Bob Polston. He presented a document entitled, "Pedestrian
Crosswalks in Downtown Mound, Minnesota" which had been prepared by Michael
Durrell, an individual who has been interested in the re-instatement of the former
crosswalk at the House of Moy. The Council discussed the matter in detail and at first
glance Mayor Polston had recommended that the issue be brought to the February 28,
1995 agenda. Councilmember Jensen indicated that she will be absent from that
meeting. Councilmember Jessen will also be absent and won't be returning from
vacation until the Committee of the Whole meeting in April. Jensen explained that
this matter received a great deal of attention, study, etc., and if the topic is going to
be reopened for discussion, it should be discussed before a full Council. After
considerable discussion regarding when it should be on a regular meeting agenda, the
Council consensus was to bring the matter for discussion to the March 14, 1995
regular meeting. Mayor Polston asked that the city manager prepare a resolution for
that meeting to ask Hennepin County to reinstate the crosswalk near the House of
Moy Restaurant, approximately 10 - 20 feet easterly from where it existed previously,
and also to have the County look at the number of crossings per day at the Pond
Arena crosswalk. The city manager was asked to make copies of pertinent
information from the city's crosswalk file which could be added to the material that
was presented by Mayor Polston. {Please note that Mayor Polston contacted the city
manager on Wednesday, February 22, 1995 and indicated that perhaps this matter
ought to be placed on the agenda where all five councilmembers would be present.
If this is the case, the Council could have it on the April 25, 1995 regular meeting
agenda. It is scheduled for the March 14th meeting and the City Council may or may
not discuss it at that time based upon Mayor Polston's call to the city manager on
February 22nd.} There being no other business, it was noted that the next Committee
of the Whole meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 21, 1995, at 7:30 pm.
SECTION 00050
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID
City of Mound, Minnesota
1995 Seal Coat Program
Sealed proposals will be received by the City Clerk until Thursday,
April 13, 1995 at 11:00 A.M., at the Mound City Hall, at which time they
will be publicly opened and read aloud, for the furnishing of all labor
and materials and all else necessary for approximately 29,000 gallons of
bituminous material and 1,450 tons of seal coat aggregate.
The bids will be considered by the City Council at their meeting
Tuesday, April 25, 1995 at 7:30 P.M.
All proposals shall be addressed to:
Fran Clark, City Clerk
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
and shall be securely sealed and shall be endorsed on the outside with
the statement "Proposal for 1995 Seal Coat Program, City of Mound" and
shall be on the Proposal Form included in the plans and specifications
for the project.
Copies of the Plans and specifications and other proposed contract
documents are on file with the City Clerk and at the office of McCombs
Frank Roos Associates, Inc., 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth,
Minnesota 55447. Plans and specifications for use in preparing bids
may be obtained at the offices of the Engineer upon payment of $20.00
per set, which is NON-REFUNDABLE. Individual sheets of the plans and
sections of the specifications may be purchased at the rate of four
dollars ($4.00) per sheet of plans and twenTy-five cents {S0.25) per
page of specifications, which is NON-REFUNDABLE.
Each bidder shall file with his bid a cashier's check, certified
check, or bid bond in an amount of not less than five (5) percent of the
total amount of the bid. No bid may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days
after the bids are opened.
The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive
any informalities or irregularities therein.
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
Robert Polston, Mayor
ATTEST: Fran Clark, City Clerk
END OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
MARCH, 1994 EDITION
00030 - 1
MFRA #6173
03/08/95
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
March 7, 1995
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY COUNCIL
FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK
LICENSE RENEWAL -
Headliner's Bar & Grill
Headliner's Bar & Grill
Expire 3/15/95. New License Period 3/16/95 to
3/15/96. Approval contingent upon all required
forms, in~rance, etc. being submitted.
LICENSE RENEWAL -
Expire 3/31/95. New License Period 4/1/95 to
3/31/96. Approval contingent upon aH required
forms, insurance, etc. being submitted.
A1 & Alma's Supper Club
.,Tree Removal Licens~
Aaspen Tree Service
Emery's Tree Service
Four Seasons Tree
Randy's Tree Service
Shorewood Tree Service
The Tree Stump Co.
Woodsman Tree Service
printed on recycled paper
BILLS
March 14, 1995
Batch 5023
Batch 5024
TOTAL BILLS
$121,996.94
105,741.38
$227,738.32
o~
g
Z
Z
0
o!
I
Z
Z
=Z Z
-I
Z
Z
0
0
Z
!
I III I '/
o o g
I Iii I II
Z
Z
0
o
Z
o
o;
I I I
I I~1
0
J
~-
x
j ·
Z
· '-q 0
z
Z
.Z
,:~
0
ZZ
Z
Z
/)
;0
:u
Z
Z
lil I,
??
Z ~
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
March 9, 1995
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
GREG SKINNER, PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT
FEBRUARY 1995 REPORT
-I-+-I--I-++++++++-I-++-I--I--I--t-++-I-+-I-'t--!-+
Sanding was done three times this month. Plowed a couple. Hauled some 3/4 to dust
rock and sand fill to Minnetrista. We also started doing some tree trimming as we had
some nice weather. We will continue trimming as weather permits.
Had to buy a new air compressor at the shop. The old one died and would not lift or
hoist up. We had it replaced by T and T Maintenance. Should be the last one I will
see around here.
During the annual report meeting, Councilmember Liz Jensen asked me about Bartlett
Boulevard where the road dips are located. We did the part east of Wilshire quite a
few years ago and it has held up real well. The problem that we are having is where
the new blacktop meets the old blacktop, it is settling down there. I spoke with John
Cameron and we are taking a look at it to see if we can do anything east of the new
patch and work our way to Fairview to try to eliminate some of the dips. This is a
possibility, we will look at it and report to Ed with recommendations.
The water department had a tough month. We had seven water main breaks and all
were within a close time. Developed some problems with switch cards that control
the start/stop of the wells. We had Automatic Systems come out and they found a
bad card and some sodders were lose, which created some intermittent starting and
stopping. This created some havoc on the mains. It seems fixed for now. Every
printed on recycled paper
spring I have Automatic Systems come out and re-calibrate and check everything on
the system. We will be doing it again this spring. We have had no breaks for a while,
things seem to be settling down. When Happy Gardens moved from Three Points,
they did not shut off the water and a water line broke. We had to dig up the
standpipes and repair them.
We have been working with the new meters, getting more and more bugs out of them.
We are not having to much trouble, some won't read, or register. We are having
some trouble getting parts back from Schlumberger in Alabama. Received a letter
stating there would be six to ten weeks for any new orders or repairs. So we have
been slowing down from installing to the businesses. Hopefully, they can get this
worked out and we will get parts faster.
SEWER
Still fine tuning the new transducers in the new lift stations. Been spending time there
and with the dialing system. The dialing systems are made by the same company as
before, but they are different than the ones we received a few years ago. We have
been working with Tristate and the manufacturer to eliminate some of the four
problems. These have been sent to the manufacturer, hopefully to return soon.
We had the bid opening for the new jet vac. ABM out of Hopkins was awarded the
bid. They took our 1974 International VacAII and our 1970 tanker and 74 trailer
mounted jet machine in trade. I expect 3-4 months for the new one to be built.
Should see something in May.
We hired a new employee this month. His name is DJ Goman. He will be reading
meters and working in the water department. We will get him into the sewer
department cleaning sewer lines this spring and some street department work during
the summer as far as blacktopping. He has done part time work in the City of Spring
Park so he has some knowledge of the maintenance and technical areas of sewer and
water.
Annual reports were given to the Council on the 14th. I feel it went pretty good.
Evaluations for the employees were completed this month.
GS:ls
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
FEBRUARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
Investment activity
Balance:
Bought:
February 1, 1995
$4,932,102
Money Market Smith Barney
Money Market First Bank
Money Market 4M
CP Smith Barney 5.58%
CP Dain Bosworth 6.00%
Matured:
Zero Coupon Dain Bosworth 5.90%
CP Smith Barney 6.16%
Money Market 4M
Balance:
Feb~ary 28,1995
287
2,932
197,291
428,738
355,438
(299,019)
(424,703)
(90,000)
$5,103,066
Audit of the Year 1 994
During this month we continued to work on getting the books ready
for the audit. The annual written report of the department submitted to you
on the 28th reflected preliminary amounts. Adjustments will be needed
to meet the national reporting requirements set by the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board, which is the board that sets what is referred
to as GAAP or the Generally Accepted Accounting Principals for
governmental entities.
Recycling Seminar Conference (As reported by Joyce Nelson)
The 12th Annual Minnesota Solid Waste Seminar was held at the
Radisson South in Bloomington on February 22 and 23.
The newest thing in recycling now is doing audits on garbage.
This audit takes about 3 hours and what they do is someone
comes in and goes through the garbage to see what should have
been recycled or can be reused. In the private sector this has been
a way to reduce refuse, thus reducing the garbage bill. The private
sector has been very cooperative. On the other hand, it seems that
the County Courthouses have been the hardest to work with. They have
been known to use the proverbial excuse, 'but it's always been done
this way.'
Items that are in the works are: a better tracking of the sales tax
revenue on SCORE, small propane tank refill and reuse, textiles, Minnesota
materials exchange - this is a catalog of items available and items wanted.
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAY~NOOD ROAD
MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(512) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
PARKS DEPARTMF~NT
FEBRUARY 1995 MONTI-II,Y REPORT
General Comments
This time of the year we begin preparing for the summer. We have scheduled equipment for delivery
before the road restrictions go on, and will be ready as soon as the weather is condusive for installation.
Supplies such as mower parts have been gone over so we have them on hand as we convert the tractors
back to mowing.
Docks
The 1995 dock renewals have been coming in steadily, and as always, the end of February sees the
majority of the applications coming in because of a late fee being assessed on March 1. The Dock
Inspector has seen an increase in new applications. He feels he can assign docks to a good portion of
them, but demand has exceeded our usual availability.
We have been working with Minnetonka Portable Dredging on riprapping this winter of about 1,000
lineal feet of shoreline. The weather made traversing the ice questionable at times, but the rock has
been placed.
Trees
We had to remove one large tree from Wiota Commons. This tree posed a problem because it was on
a steep bank. Generally we would have dropped it on the ice, but the ice was too thin and the tree
would have broken through when it was dropped, so we had to hire a crane to lift it to a flat area on
the commons.
Skating Rinks
The weather has fluctuated so much from cold to warm that it has not been good for ice. We will keep
trying to make ice as the weather is good. This usually lasts until the first of March.
Cemetery
We saw no burials in February and non all winter so far. This will make cleanup easier this Spring
when preparing for Memorial Day.
printed on recycled paper
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLIC
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Sgt. John McKinley, Acting Chief
Monthly Report for February 1995
The police department responded to 673 calls for service during the month
of February. There were 17 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses
included 3 criminal sexual conducts, 1 robbery, 6 aggravated assaults, 5
larcenies, and 2 vehicle thefts.
There were 48 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 child
abuse/neglect, 1 forgery/NSF checks, 2 narcotics, 9 damage to property, 2
liquor law violations, 4 DUI's, 2 simple assaults, 9 domestics (6 with
assault), 3 harassment, 6 juvenile status offenses, and 9 other offenses.
The patrol division iss:~:ed 220 adult citations and 5 juvenile citations.
Parking violations accoanted for an additional 62 tickets. Warnings were
issued to 119 individuals for a variety of violations.
There was ladult and 1 juvenile arrested for a felonies. There were 28
adults and 6 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. There were an additional
7 warrant arrests.
The department assisted in 16 vehicle accidents, 6 with injuries. There
were 29 medical emergencies and 44 animal complaints. Mound assisted
other agencies on 5 occasions in February and requested assistance 15
times.
Property valued at 23,590 was stolen in February.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - FEBRUARY 1995
II. INVESTIGATIONS
The investigators worked 8 child protection issues, 6 CSC's, 1 kidnapping,
a liquor license background and an aggravated robbery in February. Those
17 cases accounted for 79 hours of investigative time. Other eases
investigated included burglary, damage to property, impersonating an
officer, assault, theft, escaping custody, domestic assault and harassing
communication.
Formal complaints were issued for terroristic threats, violation of order for
protection, failure to transfer title, switching tabs, possession of stolen
property, barking dog, consuming alcohol by a minor, fail to pay sub-
contractor.
III. Personnel/Staffing
The department used approximately 21 hours of overtime during the month
of February. Officers used 52.5 hours of comp-time, 40 hours of vacation,
168 hours of sick time, and 91 holidays. Officers earned 92 hours of
comp-time.
Officer Denneson attended a defensive tactics instructor course and several
officers attended an 8 hour POST mandated training on OSHA issues and
use of force. Two officers attended an intoxilyzer refresher class.
The reserves donated 155.5 hours during the month of February.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
FEBRUARY 1995
cLEARED ExcEPT'
oFFENSES cLEA~D
EEPOETED UI~FoUNDED
Ai~R~sTED
cLEARED BY
ADULT JOY
A~BEST
Homicide CondUct
criminal Se~'ual
Robbery
AggraVated Assault
Burglary
Larceny
vehicle Theft
A~son
TOTAL
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.7
child Abuse/Neglect
Checks
Forgery/NSF property
Criminal Damage to
WeapOns
Narcotic Laws
Liquor LaWS
DWI
Simple Assault
Domestic Assault
Domestic (No Assault]
~arassment
juvenile Status offenses
public peace
TreSpassing
Ail Other offenses
48
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 1
1 0
3 0
0 0
i 0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
1 0
0
0 0
2
0 12
2
0 4
0 0
0
3
2 0
0
0 0
0
0 1
3 2
1
0 0
0
0
21
28
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
10
Property Damage Accidents 6
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents 29
Medicals 44
A~imal Complaints 5
Mutual Aid
TOTAL
602
HCCP
inspections
TOTAL
673
12
22
29
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITy REPORT
FEBRUARY 1995
s~m~ ACT~v~ s~y
Hazardous Citations
Non-Hazardous Citations
Hazardous Warnings
Non-Hazardous Warnings
Verbal Warnings
Parking Citations
DWI
Over . 10
PrOperty Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Adult Felony Arrests
Adult MiSdemeanor Arrests
Juvenile Felony Arrests
Juvenile MiSdemeanor Arrests
Part I Offenses
Part II Offenses
Medicals
Animal Complaints
Ordinance Violations
Other 'Public Contacts
TOTAL
Assists
Follow-ups
HCCp
MUtual Aid Given
MUral Aid Requested
MONTE
116
102
31
74
51
62
4
3
10
0
1
35
1
6
17
48
29
44
17
5O8
1,165
71
29
3
5
15
YEAR TO
DATE
178
151
108
103
114
7
6
22
0
1
54
3
10
34
94
56
75
32
900
2,004
118
59
18
28
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
75
105
50
108
133
87
14
10
25
0
3
48
6
6
43
78
52
18
1,686
2,704
99
161
8
21
14
DWI
More Than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired or No Plates
Stop Arm Violations
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
Nc Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Code Enforcement
Seat Belt
MV/ArV
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
FEBRUARY 1995
4
3
3
7
7@
3_0
3.7
0
16
1
62
0
4
0
9
0
282
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
FEBRUARY1995
Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
W~gANT AgRE~T~
Felony
Misdemeanor
23
25
30
0
10
17
0
0
2
4
111
1
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Run: 27-Feb-g5 14:09 PRO03
ROUND POLICE DEPARTHEHT
Primary ISN's on[y: No
D !eported range: 01/26/95 - 02/25/95
;tivity codes: ALt
Status: All
Property Types: All
Property Oescs: Att
Brands: ALt
Models: ALL
Officers/Badges: All
Enfors Property Report
STOLEN/RECOVERED BY DATE REPORTED
Prop Prop Inc no ISN Pr Prop Date Rptd Stolen Date Recov'd
Tp Desc SN Stat Stolen Value Recov'd Value
Page
Quantity Act Brand Model Off-1 Off-2
Code AssndAssnd
A Prop type Totals:
D Prop type Totals:
E Prop type Totals:
J Prop type Totals:
R Prop type Totals:
S Prop type Totals:
Prop type Totals:
X Prop type Totals:
Y Prop type Totals:
**** Report Totals:
8,500 1,500 2.000
600 0 2.000
5 5 1.000
3,850 200 3.000
538 0 1.000
1,750 0 3.000
4,033 2 4.000
4,155 0 1.000
159 120 4.000
23,590 1,827 21.000
Run: 27- Feb-95 13:17 CFS08
Primary ISN's on[y: No
Date Reported range: 01/26/95 - 02/25/95
Time range each day: 00:00 - 2~:59
How Received: AIl
Activity Resulted: AIl
Dispositions: Alt
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: AIl
Patrol Areas: AIl
Days of the week: AIl
ACTIVITY CODE
DESCRIPTION
9000 SPEEDING
9001 J'SPEEDZNG
9002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
9004 RESTR]CTED D/L
9012 OPEN BOTTLE
9014 STOP SZGN
9018 EQUIPMENT V]OLATION
9020 CARELESS/RECKLESS
9021 J-CARELESS/RECKLESS
9024 ILLEGAL/UNSAFE TURNS
9026 OVER THE CENTER LINE
9034 STOP ARM VXOLATION
9036 OBSTRUCTED VISION
9038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC
9040 NO SEATBELT
9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER
9140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS
9200 DAS/DAR/DAC
9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
9220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
9240 CHANGE OF OOt41CZLE
9312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Ca[Is For Service
INCIOENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE
NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
78
3
1
1
1
17
13
3
2
1
1
1
3
3
9
3
59
?
10
49
9
7
Page
Run: 27-Feb-95 13:17 CFS08
Primary ISN's only: No
range: 01/26/95
each day: 00:00 -
How Received: ALL
Activity ResuLted: ALL
Dispositions: ALL
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: ALL
Patrol Areas: All
Days of the ~eek: All
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE
ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
9313 FOUND PROPERTY
9314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED
9315 UNCLAIME OESTROYED ANIMALS
9430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS
7
1
1
6
10
1
1
4
1
28
3
3
1
11
1
7
1
1
7
1
9450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
9452 H & R ACCIDENTS W/TICKET
LICENSE
9566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS
9710 MEDICAL/ASU
97-50 MEDICALS
9800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIEO
9801 OOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
9802 PUBLIC ASSIST
9900 ALL HCCP CASES
9904 OPEN DOOR/ALARMS
9910 MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS
9920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
9930 HANDGUN APPLICATION
9935 LIQUOR BACKGROUND
GUEST
9980 WARRANTS
9990 MISC. VIOLATIONS
Page
Run: 2?-Feb-~ 13:17 CFS08
Primary ISN~s on[y= No
3ate Reported range: 01/26/95 - 02/25/~5
Time range each day: 00:00 - ~-]:59
How Received: AIl
Activfty Resulted: AIl
Dispositions: Ali
Officers/Badges: Att
Grids: At[
Patrol Areas= AIl
Days of the week: AIl
~CTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION
HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Ceils For Service
[NC~DENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
J3500
J3E00
_3053
_3173
~5176
~3001
NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
9~2 MUTUAL AID/8100 3
~3 MUTUAL AZD/6500 2
~5351 ASLT 5-[NFL%CTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM 6
~5352 ASLT 5-NS-INFLZCT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC 2
~5354 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM 1
~116~ BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-N-UNK NEAP-C~I THEFT 1
31265 BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN NEAP-CON PROPERTY 1
~3394 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK NEAP-CON THEFT 1
33494 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK NEAP-CON THEFT 2
~4~0 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK NEAP-UNK ACT 1
:3921 FORGERY-MS-OTHER ACT-]NSTR-PERSON 1
~2~40 DRUGS-SCH 1 NON NARC-POS SEL-MARIJU-UNK CHAR 1
~8500 DRUGS-SHALL AMOUNT HARIJUANA-POSSESSION 1
Z4103 ESC-GM-CUST CHG CONV-NO NEAP-OTH CUST 1
J2700 TRAF'ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION 1
J2900 TRAFFIC-GM-OTHER 1
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DR~VE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 3
TRAF-ACC-NS-AL 10 NORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH 3
CSC 2-UNK ACT-POS AUTH-13-15-F 1
CSC 2-NO FRC-ACQUAlNT-13-15-F 1
CSC 3-NO FRC-ACQUAINT-13-15-M 1
.JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 1
Page
Run: 2?-Feb-95 1~:17 CF$08
Primary ISN~s only: No
range: 01/26/95 - 02/25/95
each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: All
Activity Resulted: ALL
OisposJtions: ALL
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: ALt
Patrol Areas: All
Oays of the week:
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIOENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE
ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
M3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO
M4199 LIQUOR ' OTHER
M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
N3190
P2110
DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
PROP OAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
ROSB-AGG-NO BH-HIGHWAY-KNIFE CUT-ADULT'STR
THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-MONEY
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-200 OR LESS
VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-TRUCK-AUTO
VEH-501-2500-FE-THEFT-AUTO
CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL
CRIM AGNST ADMN dUST-MS-VIOL ORO PROTECTION
1
1
1
3
1
?
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
P3130
R2133
TC021
TG021
TG029
TG059
U3288
VA022
VBO21
X2200
X3250
Totals:
450
Page
Run: 2?-Feb-gS 13:39 OFF01
Primary ISN's only: No
Date Reported range: 01/26/95 - 02/25/95
Time rBnge each day: 00:00 - 25:59
Dispositions:
Activity codes: AIl
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: AIl
NOUNO POLICE DEPARTNENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page 1
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
COOE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPT%ON TOTAL CLEARED
J3500
J3E00
L3053
L3173
L5174
M3001
M3005
M4199
M5350
'A5351 ASLT S'INFLICTS ATTENPTS NRH-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
A5352 ASLT 5-NS-INFLICT BO NRN-BANDS-ASLT-AC
A5354 ASLT S'INFLICTS ATTENPTS HRN-HANDS-CHLD-FAN
Bl1~ BURG loOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT
B1265 BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN WEAP-COH PROPERTY
B3394 BURG 3'UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COH THEFT
83494 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WRAP-CON THEFT
B4990 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
C3921 FORGERY-NS-OTHER ACT-INSTR-PERSON
D2440 ORUGS-SCH 1 NON NARC-POS SEL-NARIJU-UNK CHAR
D8500 ORUGS-SNALL ANOUHT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION
E4103 ESC-GN-CUST CHG CC)NV-NO ~EAP-OTH CUST
J2700 TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
J2900 TRAFFIC-GM-OTHER
TRAF'ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNOER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
TRAF-ACC-NS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH
CSC 2-UNK ACT-POS AUTH-13-15-F
CSC 2-#0 FRC'ACQUAINT-13-15-F
CSC 3-NO FRC-ACQUAINT-13-15-M
JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENOER
JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO
LIQUOR - OTHER
JUVENILE-RUNAWAY
5 100.0
2 100.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0 0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
~.6
0.0
0.0
0o0
100.0
11
100.0
100.0
Run: 27-Feb-95 13:39 OFF01
Primary ISN's only: No
range: 01/26/95 - 02/25/95
each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: ALL
Activity codes: ALt
Officers/Badges:
Grids: Att
ACT ACTIVITY
COOE DESCRIPTION
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
H3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
P2110 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
~31~0 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
~2133 ROBB-AGG-NO BH-HIGHWAY-KNIFE CUT-ADULT-STR
TC021 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY
FT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-MONEY
TG029 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-OTH PROP
TG059 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP
J~288 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-200 OR LESS
VA022 VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-TRUCK-AUTO
/B021
<2200
~3250
VEH-501-2500-FE-THEFT-AUTO
CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL
CRIM AGNST RDMN JUST-MS-VIOL ORD PROTECTION
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
REPORTEO FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
I 0 I 0 I 0 0 I 100.0
3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
7 0 7 6 0 0 1 1 14.2
1 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
1 0 I 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
I 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
Report Totals:
61 3 58 24 14 8 12 34 58.6
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA
FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1995
FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE
2 GREG ANDERSON X~ X 2 19.00 3~ 43 6.00 258.00
3 PALR_, ]t4.BB X X 2 19.00 2~,.~__. ~ 6.{30 288.{3(2)
4 DAVE._~yD 1 9.50 2 25..___ 6.OO 150.00
5 SCOIT BRYCE 1 9.5._~C 10_____~ 23 6.00 138.00
7 .~m casa i 9.5c0 39 6.00 z~4.00
8 STEVE COLLINS ~ 1 9.50 2½ 16 6.00 96.00
9 BOB CRAWFORD X X 2 19.00 3 31 6.00 186.00
10 RANDY Eb~EI24ART X X 2 19.00 1 ,i 22 6.00 132.00
15 CRAIG H]~NDERSON
17 JASON MAAS
19 JA~.fES NELSON
20 wA~v ~m~.enW X ~ 1 9.5C 0 7 6.00 42.00
22 GREG PAI/{ X X 2 19,00 2 25 6.00 150.00"
23 MIKE PAL~! X × 2 19.00 2~ 34 6.00 204.00
24 TIM PAL~[ X X 2 19.00 2~ 35 6.00 210.00
25 GREG PEDERSQ[{ X X 2 19.00 0 28 6.00 168.00
26 CHRIS POUNDER X X 2 19.00 37½ 34 6.00
204.00
27 TONY RAS~3SSEN ~ 0 -0- 0 0 6.00 -0-
28 MIKE SAVAGE X X 2 19.0(3 4~ 29 6.00 174.00
.29 KEVIN SIPPRELL X X 2 19.00 1½ 18 6.00 108.00
.30 RON STALkMAN X X 2 19.00 2½ 19 6.00 114.00 --
31 BRUCE SVOBODA X X 2 19.00 2½ 34 6.00 204.00 --
32 TOM m~iZNSON X X 2 19.00 2 26 6.0Q 156.00
33 ED V~ X X 2 19.00 2½ !~ 37 6.00 222.00 -
34 RICK WILT,T4MS X X 2 19.001 10½ 24 6.00 144.00
..~ Tm WrLLm~ ('F) ('gO 0 -O- 3 23 6.OO 138.00
36 Dm'mS worrc~ X x 2 19.00 I 22 6.OO 132.00
37
31 26 57
2DTALS 77½ 65 142½ ' 541.50 126 994 ~ 5,996.75
126 ~ 1,167.00
~ 7,705.25
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
~). 01~ CALL~ 47 76 123 97
FIRE 7 23 30 15
~OUND
~]~21~ 19 25 /4/4 49
~INNETONKA BEACH FIRE Z ]
ORONO F~ ~ )
SHOREWOOD ~ O O
~~ O O O O
SPRING PARK ~ 4 ~
MUTUAL AID" ~ ~ O' ~ 1
~~ 1 Q 1 Q
ZOTAL F~RE CALLS ~7 3~
TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS 30 41 ~ ~7
~cI~ o ' o o
~S & ~~S 1 q
A~ 1 1 ? ?
~. 0F ~ ~ 1}0 542 692 366
- MOUND ~~ }7} 482 } 857 1017
~ ~2~ 1024 1549 1383
~K 42 ~ 72 88
~ ~ ~ ~ 88
- ~' ;~IS~A E.~ 33 ~2 75 87
~ 23 58 ~ 97
- 0~0~0 ~~ ~2 ~17 159 . 71
~ 6~ 175 ~0 168
~ 0 0 0 0
- s~o~woo~ s~ o o o o
~ o o o o
~ 1~ 120 220 )0
- SP. PARK ~~ 105 196
, ~ 205 316 }21 201
F~ 54 0 ~ 96
- ~ ~ ~~ 17 0 17 0
~ ~ 0 ~ 96
TOTAL DRILL HOURS 142~ 157~ ~ 315
ZOTAL FIRE HOURS 4~ 820 122Q 7~
TOTAL EMERGENCY HOURS 594 837 1431 1326
~ F~E & ~~ ~ 994 1657 2651 2065
~UTUAL AID RECEIVED O Q O
DATE
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR MONTH OF
_ /~ s. ~aYCE
.,, ~2. D. CARLSON
s. co= s
3 Bo CRAWFORD
i R.
O S. ER!CKSON
C. HENDERSON
3 J. m, rus
3 J. N~.$ON
MEN ON DUTY
~ M. NELSON
~9 G'. PEDERSON
:s ?~ c. PO~
/3 T. us~ssm
~//~ M. SAVAGE
/?; ~. s~~
,2/,,2 R. ST_~T,T,~,IAN
~?~ ~. svo~DA
T. SWENSON
/~'~ R. WIImlAMS
/ D. w~
TOTAL MONTHLY lfOURS /~
..MOUND_FiRE_DEPARTMENT '
REPORT
iscipline and Teamwork
~ritique of fires
're-plan and Inspections
~ools and Apparatus Identify
land Extinguisher Operation
~earing Protective,Clothing
'ilms
~irst Aid and Rescue Operation
3se of Self-Contained Masks
Pumper Operations
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural/Propane Gas Demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage O~erations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliances
Hours Training Paid:
Excused
X Unexecused
O Present / Not Paid
PERSONNEL
~%IL- J.Andersen
.Anderson
.Babb
__~D.Boyd
S.Bryce
D.Carlson
.Casey~.Collins
.Crawford
.Engelhart
S.Erickson
P.Fisk
~l~--O.Grady
.~K.Grady
C.Henderson
P.Henry
J.Maas
.Nafus
[.Nelson
M.Nelson
.Niccum
.Palm
Palm
T.Palm
.Pounder
.Rasmussen
~M.Savage
K.Sipprell
R.Stallman
B.Svoboda
r.Swenson
E.Vanecek
R.Williams
T.Williams
,tcke
.Pederson
DRILL REPORT
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of fires
Pre-plan and Inspections
Tools and Apparatus Identify
Hand Extinguisher Oper.ation
Wearing Protective,Clothing
Films
First Aid and Rescue Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
Hours Training Paid :
~Excused
HOUND--FIRE_DEPARTMENT
Pumper Operations
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural/Propane Gas Demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage O~eration.s
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliances
X Unexecused
O Present / Not Paid
PERSONNEL
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 2, 1995
City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff
Jon Sutherland, Building Official ~t~,~ ·
FEBRUARY 1995 MONTHLY REPORT
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
There were 5 building permits issued in January for a construction value of $217,968. This
included two single family dwellings. This is setting a good pace that is slightly ahead of the
last several years. There were 1 2 plumbing, mechanical and miscellaneous permits issued for
a total of 17 this month, and 50 year-to-date. Year-to-date construction value is $462,742.
PLANNING & ZONING
There were 6 cases processed this month by the Planning Commission and Council.
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER (CSO) ACTIVITY,
Total contacts by our CSO, Rick Maki, were 138 this month. The attached report details the
variety. There is additional information in the Police Department Report on CSO activity.
JS:pj
prmte~t on recycle~ paper
City of Mound
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
Month: February Year:.., ].995
THIS
R ESIDENTIAI~ fl~' PERMITS I #UNITS VALUATION II I
~ cons r.UC~,ON m UN,TS VA.UAT,ON
,,S~.GLE FAM,LY .~ETACHED 2 2 192,268 ~3 367,268
SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED ICONDOS!
MULTIPLE FAMILY 13 OR MORE UNITSl
TRANSIENT HSG. IHOTEtS / MOTELSI
SlJBTOTAL 2 2 192,268 3 367,268
NON-RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL IRETAIL/RESTAURANTI
OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL
INOUSTRIAL
PUBLIC / SCHOOLS
SUBTOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
ADDmONS TO PR,NC~P^L BUiLDiNG 2 ] 9,262
DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
DEcKs 1 800
SWiMMiNG POOLS
REMODEL- U~SC RES~OENT~AL 2 3,200 12 52,912
REMODEL - MULTIPLE DWELLINGS
SUSTOTAL 2 3,200 ~5 72,97~
NON RES,DENTIAL
II
co~u~.c~ ~"~*~.~s~*u..N~ ~ 22. 500 1 22,500
omc~ ~ ..or~ss,o..~
INDUSTRIAL
PUBLIC / SCHOOLS
~.c.~ .cc~sso.~ ~u,~,.~s
su~o~.~ 1 22, ~00 ~ 22. 500
DEMOLITIONS
RESIDENTIAL D~"ELLINGS
NON RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
TOTAL DEMOLITIONS
~ PERMITS ~ UNITS VALUATION ~ UNITS VALUATION
~s
TOTAL ~ 2 217.968 ~ q62.7q2
'19
PERMITCOUNT THISMONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
' BU'LD,N~ 5
FENCES & RETAINING WALLS 0 0
S~GNS 0 1
PLUMBING 7 15
MECHANICAL 2 11
GRAD,NG 2 0
S&W, STREET EXCAV., I:IRE. ETC. 1 4
TOT^L I 17 I 50
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MARCH 6, 1995
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
FEBRUARY MONTHLY REPORT
There were two regular Council Meetings in February. There was agenda preparation, minutes,
9 resolutions, and clean.-up items from the two meetings.
I am continuing to input the 1995 minutes (resolutions and motions) on the Clerk's Index
Program.
Cigarette and Garbage Hauler Licenses were issued as well as several miscellaneous licenses.
Notices of expiring Tree Removal Licenses were sent.
I completed my annual report which was presented at the February 14th Meeting.
The MCFOA Elections Committee, of which I am a member, met regarding upcoming
legislation on elections. We are continuing to monitor proposed bills dealing with the following:
absentee balloting; and a general housekeeping bill.
There were the usual calls and questions from citizens regarding various subjects.
printed on recycled paper
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAY~NOOD ROAD
MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
March 3, 1995
TO.,.:
FRO~: JOEL
SUBJECT:
Besides watching si: ,,,.,
much else is happening around here;i
There simply are no speci~i;i~e[z, ts
droves like we do in other mont
MAYOR, CITY
~ND CITY MANAGER
ER '~
-~'i~.
,ebs and watching the'"~::melt, not
always our slowest mo'~_by?ar.
· ,r?'. ~"it'. ·
to bring the customers,.=;!;~ ~n
only date that attempts to
pull us out of our winter doldrums. A~d '~'~ just enough to raise one
eyebrow. Of course, there is President's Day. T'~'~'=~'"~e[,,,~o~,§~.? anything either.
The ice houses have to be off the lake at the end of '~§~, ~:a.~L~,,,f~,,,t,,~,.a,,t.. there
are only 28 days doesn't help matters either. As you can'"~'l~s~'~iiiii~,,"~'"~g for
things to talk about. But, I should enjoy this lull while I can. because pretty soon I will
be running around the store clamoring, "Why don't I ever get any peace and quiet
around here"
ES:Is
~t,nled on recycled paper
of Mound
Monthly Report
Utilities
Month of: February 1995
O3/O5/95
Utility- 95
No. of Customers:
Water
Sewer
Water Used:
(in 1,000 gallons)
Billing:
Water
Sewer
Recycle
Total
Residential
1,114
1,118
16,347
$30,966
$54,696
$5,021
$90,683
Commercial
122
122
3,109
$3,565
$11,157
$102
$14,824
.Total
1,236
1,240
19,456
$34,531
$65,853
$5,123
$105,507
Payments:
Water
Sewer
Recycle
Total
$26,206
$48,292
$4,585
$79,083
$4,872
$12,332
$158
$17.362
$31,078
$60,624
$4,743
$96,445
83/82/1995 8B:5i 612--4724435 T0H REESE
PAGE
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
gOO EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 160 · WAYZATA, MINNESOTA $53~1 · TELEPHONE 6'12/473-7033
EL~IENG R, GTFIOMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEM~EIq~
William A. Johnstone
Ch&ir, Mlnnetonka
Tom Penn
¥ ice Chair, Tonka Bay
Secretary, Spring Park
Treasurer. Shorewood
Mike Bloom
Mlnnetooka Beach
AIt~r~ (Be~t) Foster
Oeephsvefl
James N, Grathwel
Excelsior
R0nald Kline
M~flnetl1$ta
Dvane Markus
Wayzata
Craig Moiler
Viclorla
Thgmas W. Reese
Moun~l
Herb J. Suerth
Weodlancl
Joseph Zwak
Greenwood
Ofof~o
TO: MOUND ~ COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 2, 1995
FROM: TOM REF_,SE, L,MCD REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: FF.~RUARY ~RT - L2VlCD
1.0 Eura~on W=~u~mi~fell Tnk
1.1 1,4o activ/ty.
~.0 Wa~r S~cP,~
~v~ ~ f~
2.2 A f~ ~~ of ~e ~me f~ ~e ~~ of ~e
'No B~Id' ~~ for ~ Ya~t O~ ~ in S~ ~
w~ ~t~. ~s w~ ~e ~j~ of ~~e ~w, ~ it w~
felt ~t ~s ~ ~ ~ '~d m~y s~ favom. It ~
vote, wm m~ ~ ~mi~ f~ f~ d~~ ~ ~e
Rn~
2.4 A d~ in ~ml~ f~ ~ ~e~ ~ ~ ~
2.5 ~e Wayma ~ W~k ~D o~~ ~m ~
~~fion in ~~.
2.6 ~e ~ ~ll ~k v~~ ~p~ ~ ~ ~
~~y ~ve li~ ~t ~ not ~mply.
3,0 L*_k,~ Um
3.1 No activitT.
B3/02/i995 0~:§i 6i2--4724435 TOM REESE
PAGE 02
4.00meml I.~-~
4.1 The LMC~ Annual Awards Dinn.- was haiti
23al. at Lord Fletchem. Attendance was 60. The qumgdy Mayors'
meeting was held F~brmry 22nd. 6 cities we~
4.2 The city of l~netrista is seeking to replace thor
prev~ou~y appointed LMCD t~f~n~five whose term has 2 years to
run, with Mayor 8alazar, who was nominat~l by the n~w cuuncil.
Under the enabling legislation establishin8 the LMCD, no authority is
provided for such a~o~ Since no ~t o. im fo~ the
replacement of a ~vo befor~ ~h~ md of his t~rm aba~nt
m~lfe~nce or misfeasance, an opinion jointly sponsored by the city
and the LMCD may be ~a~ht from the Attmney
4.3 The court has held in favor of Joe Zwak, the LMCD
member who is in litigati~ with thc LMCD over number of boa~s
being stored on a private vacant lot Whil. th~ is
ground, the feeling is that this is such a unique situatio~ that no
precedent is ~t, so that no appeal will be made.
S.O Mound_SDeetflc
cc. G~ Strmnmm
Bill Johnston~
RECEIVEE] 6 ]§§5
~- MI~TOITF~% CONS~FATION DIS~ICT
WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE, AGENDA
7:30 A/~, Saturday, March 11, 1995
Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E Wayzata Blvd, Rm 135
(Elevator handicapped access, west entrance, Wayzata Blvd)
Minnetonka Yacht Club, Review of Findings recommending
denial of new dock license.
Wayzata Yacht Club Sits i and Sits Z annual rsnswal
application identifying "dolphin" poles between slips and
at the end of dock walkway structures, in some instances
accommodating watercraft storage extending beyond dock
slips, "dolphin" poles not a part of the licensed dock
structure for this nonconforming structure (Site 1, 1:4
density, Site 2, 1:13 density)- with to-scale dock plan
~andout detailing dolphin pole locations;
Excelsior Park Pavilion, Findings and Order for Variance,
Special Density License, and new multiple dock license,
to include a certified as-built survey within 90 days of
completion of new docks.
Sston View Association, Minor Change to add final slip to
multiple dock license, changing location from east side
to west side.
1995 Multiple Dock Licenses, Renewals without change and
applications pending additional information or change.
a) Lighting Compliance Memo, prepared by staff
Ordinance Amendmsnt, an Ordinance relating to Shoreline
Requirements for Docks and Moorings amending LMCD Code
Section 2.02, Subd. 1, 3, & 4.
Planned Usage Devslopment (PUD), Procedures and Standards
and Definition for Public Piers, review subcommittee
progress report from 3/7/95 meeting (handout).
S. Additional business;
PENDING ISSUES BEFORE THE COMMITTEE (not ready for action):
a. New Multiple Dock Licenses:
* Carlson Real Estate Applications- Halsteads Bay
* Boyer Building Corp/Pelican Point Development
* Minnetonka Boat Works
b. Dolphin Pole moratorium
c. Staff recommendations on proposed ordinance changes
following envelope concept recommendations;
RECEIVED i'4AR19§§
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
February 28, 1995
TO: Water Structures Committee
FROM: Greg Nybeck .~J~
Administrative~ecSnician
SUBJECT: 1995 Multiple Dock License renewals
~. The following multiple dock licensees have submitted
renewal without change applications for 1995 with orders,
stipulations, etc. Village certificates are approved or
time (45 days) has expired. Application ~ees are paid in
full. Staff.recommends approval.
Bayshore Manor Condominiums, Excelsior Bay
Big Island Inc., Lower Lake S.
Cardinal Cove Beach Assn., Halsteds Bay
Cedarhurst Assn., Robinsons Bay
Chimo HOA Assn., Carsons Bay
Clay Cliffe HOA, Old Channel Bay
Crane Island Assn., S Upper Lake
City of Deephaven, Carsons and St. Louis Bay
Driftwood Shores Assn., Harrisons Bay
Eagle Bluff Assn., Halsteds Nay
City of Excelsior, Excelsior and St. Albans Bay
Forest Arms Improvement Assn., Forest Lake
Grandview Point Assn., Carsons Bay
Gray's Landing HOA, Grays Bay
City of Greenwood, St. Albans Bay
Halstead Acres Improvement Assn., Halsteds Bay
Harrison Harbor Twinhome Assn., Harrison Bay
Herzog Acres Assn., Wayzata Bay
Jennings Cove Dock Owners Assn., Jennings Bay
Lafayette Club, Crystal Bay
Lakewinds Assn., Spring Park Bay
Lindbo Landing, Lower Lake S.
Lord Fletchers of the Lake, Coffee Cove (Subject to
refund of $323.75 due to fee calculation error)
Loring Acres Beach Assn., W. Upper Lake
Maple Crest Estates, Jennings Bay
Meadowbrook Boat Club, Inc., Grays Bay and Libbs Lake
Methodist Lakeside Assembly, Wayzata Bay
Minnetonka Edgewater Apts., Spring Park Bay
Minnetonka Portable Dredging, Gideons Bay
Minnetonka Power Squadron, Big Island Passage
City of Mound, Priests Bay, Cooks Bay, W. Upper Lake,
Phelps Bay, Black Lake, Emerald Lake, Seton Lake,
Harrisons Bay, Jennings Bay, West Arm
Navarre Cove HOA, Carmans Bay
Multiple Dock License renewals, 3/1/95, Page 2
Dr. Glen Nelson, Stubbs Bay
Pheasant Lawn HOA, Carmans Bay
P.M. Pizza Enterprises, Inc., Seton Lake
Presbyterian Homes on Lake Mtka, Black Lake
Ridgewood Cove Property Owners, Jennings Bay iSubJect to
paying fee balance of $26.25)
Art Rossberg, S. Upper Lake
Sandy Beach Place, West Arm
Seton Twin Homes, Rmerald Bay
Seton Village Assn., Harrisons Bay
Smithtown Bay Assn., Smithtown Bay
City of Tonka Bay, Gideons Bay (Subject to paying fee
balance of $90.00)
Tonka Bay Marina, Lower Lake S.
Trillium Bay HOA, Trillium Bay, Halsted's Bay
Victoria Estates HOA, North Arm --~ ...................
Walden Tract X Property Owners, St. Louis Bay
Walter's Port Assn., Carmans Bay
City of Wayzata, Wayzata Bay
West Beach Apts., Coffee Cove
West Point Place HOA, Lafayette Bay
Willow Woods Corp., Gideons Bay
Windward Marina, Browns Bay, Lake Tanager
Woodend Shores Beach Assn., W. Upper Lake
B. The following multiple dock licensees have submitted
renewal without ohange applications for 1995 with orders,
stipulations, etc. Village certificates are approved or
time (45 days) has expired. A deposit was paid on the
aDDlication fee with the balance due b_~ 3/31/95. Staff
recommends approval subject to balance ~ue being pai~.
A1 & Alma's, Cooks Bay
Bayview Condominiums, Spring Park Bay
Beans Greenwood Marina, Inc., St. Albans Bay
Big Island Veterans Camp, Veterans Bay
Boat Rentals of Minnetonka, Harrisons Bay
Boulder Bridge HOA, Smithtown Bay .........
Chapman Place Marina, Cooks Bay
Cochrane's Boatyard, Inc., Excelsior and St. Albans Bays
Curly's Minnetonka Marina, Lower Lake S.
Excel Marina, St. Albans Bay
Excelsior Park Yachting Center, Excelsior Bay
Gideons Point HOA, Gideons Bay
Grays Bay Marina, Grays Bay
Libbs Lake Boat Club, Grays Bay
Lord Fletcher's Apts., West Arm
Minnetonka Yacht Club, St. Louis and Carson Bays
North Shore Marina, Maxwell Bay
Rockvam Boat Yards, Inc., Site 1, West Arm
Multiple Dock License renewals, 3/1/95, Page 3
Rockvam Boat Yards, Inc., Site 2, West Arm
Sailors World Marina, Smiths Bay
Seahorse Condo Assn., Jennings Bay
Shorewood Yacht Club, Gideons Bay
Upper Mtka Yacht Club, S. Upper Lake
C. INFORMATIONAL. The following multiple dock licensees
have submitted renewal without change applications for
1995 that are incomplete and need additional information,
These applications will be presented at the April 8, 1995
Water Structures Committee meeting.
Michael Arvidson
Foxhill HOA
Hennepin County
Harry T. Kreslins
Lafayette Ridge HOA
Lakeside Marina
Maple Forest Association
City of Minnetonka Beach
Maple Forest Association
Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono)
Minnetonka Boat Works (Wayzata)
Park Hill/ Park Island Apartments
INFORMATIONAL. The following district mooring area
licensees have submitted renewal without change
applications for 1995. These applications are
Dendinq notification from the cities regarding the
village certificates. These applications will be
presented at the April 8, 1995 Water Structures
Committee meeting.
City of Deephaven
City of Excelsior
Methodist Lakeside Assembly
Minnetonka Yacht Club
Wayzata Yacht Club
INFORMATIONAL. Licenses under consideration for
significant changes and/or re-application as new dock
license.
Excelsior Park Tavern
Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 1
Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 2
RECEIVED6 1995
STAFF MEMORANDUM
March 3, 1995
TO:
FROM:
Water Structures Committee
G~r e~g~Ny~dmini str at ive Technician
SUBJECT: Seton View Association Minor Change
Seton View Association is applying for a minor change in
their multiple dock renewal. The applicant is proposing to
reconfigure their site plan by relocating slip D1 from the
east side of slip C2 to the west side of slip Al. The
applicant prefers an enclosed "U" shaped slip rather than a
tie-on slip as currently licensed. This move is proposed to
assure proper setbacks are maintained on the east end of the
dock structure and to better balance the dock structure,
according to the properties, on the west end.
Staff recommends approval.
Lake Minnetonka Conserv
LMCD Receipt # /
City response due
received
(for LMCD use)
DOCK - NEW/CHANGE
:ense Year
'No. of Boats
Boat Density Index~
Can be reached at phone
Because this form is !
to be copied, please !
use black ink or type.!
APPLICATION:
NEW MULTIPLE DOCK,
LAUNCHING RAMP,
AND/OR MOORING LICENSE
Any change in slip size, ownership, length, width, height or location of a structure
or launching ramp requiring a license under LMCD Code t2.03 requires the issuance of
a new license, pursuant to f2.03, Subd. 7. The Board may issue a new license without
a public hearing provided the facility is in compliance with the Code; there is no
change in the number of watercraft stored; and there is no substantial change in slip
size, length, width, height, location, use, type of watercraft stored, or amount of
lake obstructed or occupied.
Print or type o~mer~s name
Phone; if no
answer, call:
Phone; if no
answer, call:
Phone
Owner's address
Business name (if different from o~er)
Contact person (if different from owner)
Street address
Mailing address (if different from street address)
Property located in the City of ///~?~..I/VL~
Property is riparian to LMCD bay/area(s)
, No(s).
Classification of use per §2.11, Subd. 2 (please check one):
a) commercial marina d) transient g) private residence
b) private club e) outlot association \ h) other (explain)
c) municipal f) multiple dwellin~~
2. Site Lake frontage = feet. BSU density --
3. Describe change being applied for: ~-'~-~-~/~7~-' -~-Z //-'~
i[ ~' ~ Tf' ~, ~- - ~ ~ ~--~ T ~, IZ~--
JAN 1 11995 with the District:
Locator map
Documents listed below are required; check that they are attached or on file
Scaled drawing showing present dockage
~SCaled drawing showing proposed dockage
Scaled drawing of docks on abutting properties,
L.M.C~O. ,~T~..~ ~ County plat map
~4~-~J--~-~ertified land survey,
DEC 1- 199 bsence of significant data requested above could result in a processin~ delay.
~M.~.D. (over)
Lake Hinnetonka Conservation District
New Dock License Application .~-7~'~. ~/e~' /~/._~...~
(Name)
5. Public liability insurance: Coverage $ ; Compan~
6. Watercraft Storage Units (WSU) computation schedule:
BSU @ 1 WSU (each slip up to 20' long and/or up to 10' wide) - WSU
BSU @ 1½ WSU (each slip 20'+ to 24' long and/or up to 11' wide) - WSU
BSU @ 2 WSU (each slip 24'+ to 32' long and/or up to 12' wide) = ~WSU
BSU @ 2½ WSU (each slip 32'+ to 40' long and/or up to 14' wide) - WSU
BSU @ 3 WSU (each slip 40'+ to 48' long and/or up to 16' wide) - WSU
BSU @ 4 WSU (each slip over 48' long and/or over 16' wide) - WSU
BSU
Total Watercraft Storage Units (WSU)
7. Fee calculation:
Base fee
Plus number of Watercraft Storage Units (WSU) /~- @ $7.50 as
determined from WSU computation and schedule shown in No. 6 above ..... +
5 0
Total fee enclosed (this fee is for processing of the application
and does not entitle the applicant to a license) ..................
Application fees are non-refundable.
I certify that the information provided herein and the attachments hereto are true
and correct; I understand that any license issued may be revoked by the District for
violation of the LMCD Code. I agree to reimburse the District for any legal,
surveying, engineering, inspection, maintenance or other expenses incurred by the
District in excess of the amount of the application fee. I consent to permitting
officers and agents of the District to enter the premises at all reasonable times to
investigate and to determine whether or not the Code of the District is being complied
with.
I agree to submit a certified, as-built survey upon completion of the docks.
Tit le .i:_'-' ~//~ ~' '~C - r/-~ .~ ~,~:7~"'
Relationship to owner
Return this application and attachments to:
11/92
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
900 E. Wayzata Blvd., Suite 160
Wayzata fin 55391 ~
Phone (612) 473-7033
SURVEY FOR: Mr. Bill Niccum
SITE PLAN AND DOCK LOCATION
DESCRIPTION:
SETON VIEW, City of Mound Hennepin County, Minnesota
o Denotes Iron Monuments Pound
o~
(612) 421-9126
\1
t
I hereby certify that this survey
was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a
duly Registered Professional Land
Surveyor under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Date~Y.b~ llth day of ~uly, 1991.
M a -a'sota Lic,,,e o. 122 7.
JAN 1 t 1995
!
SETON VI~rW I
·
. ~-~ ~ ~ : ..
~L- ~ ' '--
g'~ ~ *One piling to contact '
island at 929.4' as per ,~ ,
DNP, authorization 6/2/88.
-'V" ~ "
-- . ., , Iq?l-
. .., m~,,~ 19~ -
NOV2~' i990 ~ .~n ,
~ ,
L~.c.o. ~. ~C, ~
~ ...... -.. I~Z.~O .... ' '" ~'~
RECEIVED :' AR 8 'lgg5
BOARD OF DT:REOTOR$
Special Meeting
AGENDA
7:00 A.M., Friday, March 10, 1995
Conference Room 135, Norwest Bank Bldg.
900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Wayzata MN
(Handicapped Access, West Entrance Wayzata Blvd.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. Executive director resignation, terminating position as
of April 7, 1995;
Appointment of interim executive director;
a. Terms of appointment
3. Organizational structure review;
4. Executive director search plans
5. Adjournment
RECEIVED 14AR8 1,995
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
Meeting Notice and Agenda
8:30 am, Friday, March 10, 1995
Norwest Bank Bldg. Conference Rm 135, Wayzata
1. Introductions and welcome;
2. Review, accept/amend minutes of 1/13/95 as mailed;
MN DNR report, Chip Welling:
a. 1995 EWM Control Program presentation;
b. Additional DNR mi!roi! control priorities;
Biocontrol research progress update, U of M Fisheries,
Dr. Ray Newman;
LMCD 1995 harvest planning progress:
a. Proposal to equip one harvester with paddle wheels
b. Staff preparations
c. Plan overview
Preparations for analysis on the effectiveness of
mechanical weed pulling for compared to cutting, engaging
an independent contractor to develop the analysis;
(Review of plan developed for 1994, postponed to 1995)
(per equipment developed for LMLOA by Burandt/Evans and
an LMCD cutting harvester.)
"Lake-safe" lawn fertilizer product availability,
phosphorus-free lawn treatment option -- discussion
of Central Rivers Cooperative announcement;
8. Additional agency, lake association reports;
9. Additional business;
9. Adjournment
RECEIVED ;';AR 8 gg5
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
PLEASE NOTE CHANGE OF DAY FROM MONDAY TO TUESDAY FOR THIS MEETING
5:30 pm, Tuesday, March 14, 1995
Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E. Wayzata Blvd., Rm 135
(Elevator handicapped access, west entrance, Wayzata Blvd)
1994 Boat Density Survey review with MN DNR Senior Planner Tim
Kelly, (survey copy provided for 12/7/94 Board meeting, please
bring to meeting);
Consideration of restrictions on charter boats in bays with
critical density problems, including Carsons Bay;
Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol:
a. Significant activity report (handout);
b. Additional Business
4. Additional business
5. Adjournment
RECEIVE
L~ ~NN~TON~ CONSeRVaTiON DISTR~CT
Zebra Mussel and Exotics Action Plan Subcommittee
Agenda
8:30 am, Wednesday, March 15, 1995
LMCD Conference Room 160, Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata
1. Review, accept/amend minutes of 10/19/94 as mailed;
Review Draft 7 of Management Plan for Ecologically
Harmful Exotic Species: Zebra Mussel, Gary Montz, DNR
Ecological Services -- subcommittee discussion:
a. Goal 1: Accurately assess the status of zebra
mussels in MN.
Goal 2: Contain zebra mussel populations in MN to
existing locations.
Goal 3: Improve zebra mussel management in MN.
be
Accurately assess the status of zebra mussels in MN:
Objective: Determine state wide zebra mussel
distribution, abundance in MN
Contain zebra mussel populations in MN (to minimize
spread):
Objective: Reduce spread of zebra mussels by
changing human behaviors that spread this exotic.
Improve zebra mussel management:
Objective: Support and conduct research to improve
zebra mussel management.
e o
Sources of Funding for Zebra Mussel Management and
Research:
> Minnesota sources
> Federal sources
Subcommittee recommendations;
"Minnesota Invaders" Star/Tribune news feature of 2/20/95
inviting subcommittee comment;
4. Additional business;
5. Set next meeting date;
6. Adjourn
RECEIVEI] 8 1995
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
Minutes
8:30 am, Friday, January 13, 1995
Norwest Bank Building. Room 135, Wayzata
Present: Herb Suerth, Chair, LMCD Board; Tom Reese, LMCD
Board; Ross McGlasson, LMCD Board; Chip Welling, Mn DNR
Ecological Services; Rick Walsh, Mn DNR Fisheries; John
Barren, Hennepin Parks; Marsha Videen, East Parkers Lake
Improvement Assn.; Greg Nybeck, LMCD Admn Technician; Gene
Strom~nen, LMCD Executive Director;
MINUTES. Reese moved, Walsh seconded to accept the minutes
as submitted. Motion carried.
MN DNR REPORT. Chip Welling addressed the committee on:
a} 1994 DNR Annual Report - The 1994 activities report is
nearly finished. An abstract of the milfoil section of
the report was provided.
b) Milfoil infestations - Two new milfoil infestations were
discovered during 1994. (1987 was the only year lower than
1994, this being the first year milfoil was fottnd in Lake
Minnetonka). The DNR cannot be certain of the total
number of infestations in Minnesota lakes. Other infested
lakes have likely not been discovered because of the
difficulty in identifying milfoil.
Efforts to control milfoil where it is present and to
limit the spread through educating boaters is contributing
to the lower number of infested lakes.
Four lakes with EWM prior to 1994 were studied with
control work initiated by the DNR. EWM was not found in
these lakes in 1994. EWM may be present in these lakes,
but not finding any indicates it may have been eradicated.
One of these lakes is Sugar Lake in Wright County. EWM
has not been present in Sugar Lake the past three boating
seasons. It has been controlled with 2.4D
Reese complimented the home owners group on Sugar Lake.
Reese felt they are an example of what can be done with
early detection of EWM and an aggressive lake owners group
that takes an interest in eradicating it.
The three other lakes were Augusta, Wright County, last
seen in 1993, Christmas Lake, last seen in 1992, and
Crooked Lake, Anoka County, last seen in 1992.
Costs of using 2.4D is approximately $200/acre, depending
upon the acreage volume being treated. Sonar costs are
hard to estimate due to the varying lake depths being
treated.
In 3 of 22 lakes with milfoil that had control efforts in
1993 (control of 23), the milfoil was reduced in 1994.
One lake was eradicated, three more had an acreage
reduction in EWM, and the other 19 had no reduction or an
actual increase.
EWM Task Force, Minutes, 1/13/95, P. 2
Cooperative agreements were used in 1994 between 28 lake
organizations and the DNR in EWM control projects.
The DNR supported a number of research projects, as
recommended by the Legislative Commission on Minnesota
Resources (LCMR). The primary project is EWM biological
control. Dr. Ray Newman is one of the principal
investigator. Newman said that aguatic weevils have been
used experimentally to reduce EWM. However no long term
reduction of EWM has been determined using weevils.
Studies are being conducted on the basic genetics of
milfoil. Welling reported the range of genetic variation
of EWM is greater than previously thought. This
information could be used in determining the resistance of
herbicides and how the plant reproduces.
Welling discussed fluridone, which is the active
ingredient in Sonar. fluridone is a systemic herbicide.
Systemic herbicides control from within the plant body
while contact herbicides kill that part of the plant in
which they come intact with. Contact herbicides are
generally used within dock areas to control but not kill
plants. Contact herbicides act faster which may be
desirable.. Systemic herbicides may actually eradicate
the plant itself, although unaffected remaining root
structures can regenerate new plant growth.. Fluridone,
may kill EWM but it requires a very long exposure to the
plant. There is a risk of fluridone killing all plants in
the water body if the concentration is high enough.
McGlasson asked about the time of the year to apply Sonar.
Welling said it is best to apply fluridone early, about
mid-May, exposing the milfoil early and for the longest
time as it grows in the spring and summer. This is due
to the need for long exposure to fluridone for it to be
effective.
Barren added that fluridone mixing in the water is
difficult to predict. Wind and temperature are variables
that cannot be controlled. Because of these variables
Barren believes that fluridone is a risky chemical.
Welling added putting herbicides such as 2.4D and
fluridone in lakes is a complicated business.
Lakes with partial milfoil infestations will be evaluated
this winter to determine if they can be targeted for more
aggressive use of herbicides, such as 2.4D and fluridone.
Suerth asked whether fluridone (Sonar) treatment of EWM in
Lake Minnetonka is feasible in the next five years?
Welling said that Sonar is not likely to be used in Lake
Minnetonka, at least in the next five years. The lake
size, water volume and diversity of bays make a lake-wide
application of Sonar difficult and very expensive.
q$?
EWM Task Force, Minutes, 1/13/95, P. 3
Partial bay treatments will not work because of the
reinfestation which would occur from non-treated bays.
Garlon (triclopyr), similar to 2.4D, has been used in a
1994 test on Phelps and Carsons Bays. Garlon is likely to
replace 2.4D for "spot" treatments of EWM.
Welling added that the ideal situation to treat EWM with
fluridone (Sonar) is on smaller lakes, 25 acres or less,
which are not spring fed and have limited flow.
Suerth asked how much time it takes for 2.4D to act.
Welling said it depends on the application rate, anywhere
from two to ten days.
b) 1995 EWM control plan highlights:
* The plan will be organized essentially the same as 1994.
* The DNR will announce the availability of funds soon.
Thee funds granted must be spent by the end of June,
the State's fiscal year end.
c) Fluridone (Sonar) treatment evaluation in East Parkers and
Zumbra Lakes
* Sonar treatment and evaluation will continue in East
Parkers and Zumbra Lakes.
* Discussions will take place this winter between DNR
staff and interested parties from around the state on
the future of the project.
d) 1995 work plan for biocontrol of Eurasian water m/lfoil
* RFP's will be out in the next few weeks. DNR will copy
LMCD on the RFP's which are being sent beyond Minnesota.
e) MN Conservation Corps (MCC) Access Monitoring:
* The committee had a lengthy discussion on the use of
Minnesota Conservation Corps (MCC) at Crooked Lake and
other lake access ramps. These paid summer DNR
employees are doing what was hoped in early years might
be done by lake association volunteers. The long hours
and sometimes boring aspect of few boats to inspect has
discouraged reliable volunteer service.
* Walsh commented on the use of Rotenone to kill rough
fish. Treatment of Rotenone has been done on lakes
after treatment with Sonar. The results include clearer
water which results in more desirable plant growth.
This has been done for the restocking of native plants.
BIOCONTROL RESEARCH PROGRESS UPDATE, U OF M FISHERIES.
Dr. Ray Newman could not attend the meeting, no report.
LMCD UPDATE ON EXPLORING CONTRACT SERVICE TO CONDUCT
MECHANICAL HARVESTING ON LAKE MINNETONKA IN 1995.
Strommen reported that contracting EWM harvesting for 1995
not realistic at this time. The public bidding requirement
and the detail required in a Request for Proposal (RFP)
outlining the specifications for the harvesting of EWM with
the limited time remaining makes it impractical at this time.
EWM Task Force, Minutes, 1/13/95, P. 4
A cost analysis of contracting the Dr0gram indicates a
substantial increase would occur. At the same time LMCD
supervisory and administrative time would be significant.
At a budget average of about $100,000 the past three years, a
'contractor would add some $30,000 to $50,000 to the program.
The contractor benefit would be in the area of presumed
improved efficiencies. The question as this time is whether
that cost is worth the efficiency which might be gained.
Reese expressed support for using a contract service. He
believes that harvesting can be improved on Lake Minnetonka.
Strommen reported a plan to use aerial flights to determine
where milfoil growth is located. These areas would be
photographed and marked on large-scale maps for ease of
operator location. Marker buoys must also be used to locate
these areas on the lake to assist the operators.
Reese agreed it is not practical to bid out harvesting of EWM
for 1995 with the current LMCD obligations and staff changes.
Reese supports exploring use of barges to reduce harvester
transport time.
Minnetonka Portable Dredging provided barges in 1991.
Unfortunately, that became a high water year and milfoil
growth was substantially reduced, making the barges too
costly to continue for the volume of EWM being harvested.
Suerth believes more information to make a rational decision.
He recommended an early discussion to determine the
feasibility of contracting and barge services.
Welling recognized the problem of harvesting efficiency being
discussed as typical of other experiences he is aware of.
Whether the milfoil is matted on the lake surface and the
experience of the harvester determines the efficiency. He
· -agreed with using aerial flights to identify milfoil areas
and mark them with buoys for harvesting. He also supports
the harvesters cutting channels to the water leading into the
docks, avoiding clear-cutting of these areas. The areas
around the docks is the responsibility of the dock owner.
Strommen concurred with the idea of cutting channels. One
difficulty in doing this is how the boaters will find the
channels once cut, particularly if all milfoil is submerged.
Possibly a uniform buoy marker could be left in surh channel
areas. This introduces a new element of buoy placement.
ADDITIONAL AGENC"f, LAKE ASSOCIATION REPORTS.
Pat Wulff, Lake Independence Home Owners Association,
reported that their association is placing emphasis on
developing a lake management plan. She is working on
'problems that need to be addressed in such a management plan.
'Marsh Videen, East Parkers Lake, reported that property
owners have been happy with the lack of milfoil as a result
._.of the 1994 Sonar treatment. They are interested in the
EWM Task Force, Minutes, 1/13/95, P. 5
study results. She noted some lake property owners are
concerned with levels of herbicides in the East Parkers Lake
and its effect on the fish.
Batten reported a study is being conducted by Hennepin Parks
to determine levels of chemicals, especially phosphorous and
nitrogen, in run-off from golf courses. Barten indicated he
would pass the report on to Strommen when it is completed.
FEBRUARY MEETING DATE. The committee agreed to cancel the
February 10, 1995 meeting. The next meeting is scheduled for
March 10, 1995.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS. Suerth called attention to the Lake
Smarts Book and asked if the LMCD and other organizations,
such as the LMLOA, should encourage lake owners to become
familiar with it. The committee agreed the book merits extra
visibility and promotion. It has a wealth of practical tips
on lake maintenance and preservation.
Suerth asked about the weed puller endorsed by the LMLOA.
Suerth questioned the technology and whether it is
appropriate for Lake Minnetonka.
Strommen reported the weed puller is expected to be ready
this summer. The LMCD is expected to conduct an evaluation
of pulling EWM versus harvesting it. Arrangements need to be
started early in the year with LMLOA and the puller operator.
Reese said he thinks the Wisconsin DNR is giving up on the
controlling zebra mussels in their lakes. He hoped the
Minnesota DNR has a different philosophy towards the control
of zebra mussels.
This subject is being addressed by the Zebra Mussel and
Exotics Subcommittee which will meet March 15.
ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business, the meeting
was adjourned at 10:40 am.
Executive Director
March 6,
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RECEIVE E1 §
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995
Lake Use and Recreation Committee
Oreg .ybeck
Administrative
Technician
Consideration of Restrictions on Charter Boats
Using Bays with High Boat Density
Charter boats perform a public service by providing a lake
experience for persons who otherwise do not boat on Lake
Minnetonka, or prefer to use charter boats instead of their
own personal boat for special occasions. LMCD licenses
charter boats for the public service they provide.
The presence of charter boats in some high-use bays has
prompted a review of restricting or eliminating their use in
these bays. Carsons Bay is a current example where this use
has been questioned.
Given the fact that waters of the lake are public, the LMCD
has a responsibility to balance that use so it does not
infringe on the rights of other boaters and/or riparian
property owners.
Riparian owners have expressed concern for the frequent
presence of Charter Boats in Carsons Bay. There are reports
that some charter boats spend time in the bay rather than
cruise in and out of it.
Lacking specific data this year, it may be appropriate to set
some guidelines for charter boat operators for 1995 which
would:
Have each charter operator document the number of trips,
by date and time, when Carsons Bay and other high density
bays are toured.
o
Prohibit as a license condition:
a. Rest stops in high density bays, other than for
emergency purposes. Such emergency purposes would be
recorded in the official charter trip log for LMCD
inspection or verification;
b. Use of public address systems for tour announcements
c. Use of public address systems for music which can be
heard beyond the boat
d. Use of live music
e. Carefully monitoring "Slow, No Wake" requirements
Upon review of the 1995 data, the Lake Use and Recreation
Committee could consider further action for future years.
RECEIVE[} 8 1995
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Zebra Mussel and Exotics Action Plan Subcommittee
Minutes
8:30 am, Wednesday, October 19, 1994
LMCD Office Conference Room #160
Norwest Bank Bldg., Wayzata
Present:
Herb Suerth, LMCD board, Woodland; John Barten,
Hennepin Parks, Tom Frahm, LMLOA; Gary Montz, Jay
Rendall, MN DNR; Executive Director Gene Strommen;
MINUTES. Montz questioned the point Gary Nelson made for the
MN Sportsfishing Congress (MSC) at the 9/14 meeting asking
for more information on transporting aquatic plants on
boats/trailers. Rendall says he believes from previous
discussions that MSC is comfortable with the rules on exotics
transport except for heavy fines. MSC believes fines should
be relative to the violation.
Markell's report for DNR Trails & Waterways (T&W) was also
commented on by Rendali. T&W Department personnel previously
considered exotics a problem of Ecological Services, not so
much one for them to be concerned with in access development.
Meetings with MN Lakes Assn and the LMCD exotics subcommittee
has helped their personnel to understand the exotics threat.
The minutes were accepted as mailed.
EXOTICS SPECIES PRESENTATION, JAY RENDALL, MN DNR EXOTIC
SPECIES COORDINATOR. Rendall opened by noting that in his
travel around the country he finds MN's efforts are among the
most pro-active in dealing with exotics with the exception of
California, which has major agriculture concerns with
exotics, on land as well water. CA, for example, inspects
boats coming into the state -- at stations already in place
for other agricultural inspections. Rendall realizes more
control is MN is still needed.
FEDERAL LAWS were reviewed as detailed in Rendall's outline.
Since zebra mussels have been found in the St Croix River,
federal law is now being considered to enforce control of
transport in the St. Croix River.
STATE STATUTE prohibits transportation of zebra mussel,
Eurasian and northern water milfoil. DNR is now in the
process of preparing permanent rules to replace emergency
rules. Draft MN Rules Chapter 6216 of 10/18/94 detailing the
new rules were circulated. Copies are available through DNR
(297-1464) or LMCD. Adoption is anticipated by March, 1995.
STATE MANAGEMENT PLAN is being developed as an umbre!]a plan.
It has been delayed due to the priority to develop plans for
EWM and Flowering Rush. Rendall's outline provides detai'ls.
ZEBRA MUSSEL AND EXOTICS ACTION PLAN SUBCOMMITTEE, Minutes,
October 19, 199~, ?. 2
ZEBRA MUSSEL plan drafted by Gary Montz will be incorporated
in %he umbrella plan. Watercraft cleaning was discussed.
Use of portable boat wash units may be tested to determine
public acceptance. They are expected to be costly.
PUBLIC ACCESS regulation to control exotics has two
exceptions: no closing of accesses and no fees at accesses.
The surcharge fee goes from $5 to $3/boat for three years
starting 1/1/97. The subcomraittee was unanimous that even $5
is inadequate. Rendall sees the need to broaden funding to
riparian, other benefitting property owners. The surcharge
must be justified for its future continuation. Exotic
species monitoring and watercraft inspection results for 1993
and 1994 were circulated.
USE OF BOAT STICKERS to limit boat use to certain waters,
infested or ~ninfested, was discussed. The conclusion was
that such a system will be limited to what is politically,
economically and socially acceptable by the legislature and
the boat using public which influences them. A listing of
public accesses in the state was circulated. Many private
accesses are known to be heavily used.
SURVEY of boater's travel habits is an area Rendall has an
interest and will assist with their resources.
Subcommittee members thanked Rendall for his thorough and
enlightening presentation.
MN DNR REPORT, GARY MONTZ. The boater survey with Sea Grant
will be coordinated with people expert in this area, Montz
reported. It is believed that 20% of boaters travel from one
water body to another within one to five days, and that these
boaters do this about six times a year. This movement
pattern suggests a definite potential for spreading exotics.
Herb Sued'th supported some mechanism in boat registration for
ccntrolling the movement of boats from infested waters to
uninfested waters.
It was also pointed out that Congress is looking a new
technologies for ocean ships to reduce/prevent exotics spread
NEXT MEETING, ADJOURNMENT. The next meeting was proposed to
be scheduled in January. There being no further business,
the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 am.
Executive Director
.WESIONKA PUBUC ~ZHOOLS · DISTRICT 277
SHIRLEY HILLS PRIMARY
2450 WILSHIRE BLVD.. MOUND, MN 55364 · 472-0321
l~chald G. Nicolt, F.~IS Principal
MAYOR ROBERT POLSTON
MOUND CITY HALL
5345 MAYWOOD RD.
MOUND, MN 55364
RECEIVED HAR
7
DEAR MAYOR POLSTON,
AS YOU MAY KNOW, SHIRLEY HILLS PRIMARY HAS BEEN SELECTED AS A
SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE.
THE STUDENTS, STAFF AND PARENTS OF SHIRLEY HILLS ARE IN THE
PROCESS OF PLANNING A CELEBRATION OF THAT EVENT.
THE CELEBRATION WILL BE HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 24TH AT MOUND
WESTONKA HIGH SCHOOL. A PICNIC WILL BE HELD FROM 5:30 to 6:30 P.M.
IN THE COURT YARD, WITH A PROGRAM TO FOLLOW IN THE GYM.
WE WOULD BE VERY PLEASED IF YOU COULD JOIN US THE EVENING OF MAY
24TH FOR THE PICNIC AND OFFER A FEW WORDS DURING OUR CELEBRATION
PROGRAM.
I WILL GIVE YOU A CALL SOON TO CONFIRM IF THIS WOULD BE POSSIBLE FOR
YOU , OR YOU MAY REACH ME AT THE SCHOOL. 472-0324.
WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF OUR REQUEST.
L~D,~ ~~N ' ¢S I NC E' R ELY' ~z..,.,..z~.
MEDIA CENTER ASSISTANT
PARENT VOLUNTEER
Plan to attend the
I I I
~ague of Minnesota Cities
League of Minnesota Cities
Thursday, March 30
Radisson St. Paul Hotel
Tentative Program
9:15 a.m. President's message
9:30 a.m. State revenues, the Governor's budget, and cities
VVill t 995 be a landmark year for city finances?
10:30 a.m. In-depth discussion of legislative events
11:30 a.m. Lunch
1:00 p.m. Briefing on legislative issues
League staff will brief you on the most important issues to discuss with your legislators
2:00 p.m. Meet with your legislator at the State Capitol (transportation furnished)
Schedule a time in advance or contact Andrea Atherton at the League to help set
a meeting with your legislator.
Page 14
LMC Cities Bulletin_
1995 Legislative Conference
Thursday, March 30
Radisson St. Paul Hotel
1995 Legislative Conference Registration Form
City
Name Title
Name Title
Name Title
(Please print or type)
Registration fee: Member city officials -- [--~advance $30 Non members -- [--] advance $45
r-}on-site $45 []on-site $60
Special Needs: If you are disabled and require special services or transportation, or if you have
special dietary needs, please attach a written description to this registration form.
Fee includes conference registration and luncheon.
Make check payable and mail to
Finance Department-LC
League of Minnesota Cities
3490 Lexington Avenue North
St. Paul, MN 55126
Advance Registration
Deadline-March 16, 1995
1995 Legislative Conference Housing Form
Organization League of Minnesota Cities
Function 2~SJ_egJs~tive Conference Dates March 29-30:1995
All requests for the above group must be received by March 8. 1995
Name Company.
Last First
Address
(Please print or type)
City
Sharing room with
Signature
State Zip.
No. of persons
Phone Number
i i I Month Day Year
Month,1 Day Year I,
Arnval Dale Amval Time
Departure Date
Check in time 3:00 p.m. Check out time 12:00 p.m.
Accommodations 'will not be ccnfirmed without a check for the first night's deposit or
use your credit card number to guarantee your reservation. You will be charged for the
first night if reservations are not canceled 48 hours prior to arrival.
Credit card # ~Amex ~]Visa 2 Mastercard
Expiration date 0'l.ase che=k one)
Special Housing Request: If you have special housing needs, e.g. wheelchair
accessible room, etc. please attach a written description to this housing form.
Special Reduced Rates for
Members Only
__ $72 Single
__ $72 Double (2 people)
Make check payable and
mail to the
Radisson Hotel St. Paul
11 East Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55101
March 3, 1995
Page~15