1992-05-12CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The city of Mound, through
teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality
services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a
safe, attractive and flourishing community.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
7:00 P.M., TUF_b~AY, MAY 12, 1992
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M. LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
Hennepin County Assessor Keith Rennerfeldt will be
present. The Council will accept complaints on taxable
market value from residents. The Assessor will then
review these properties and bring back recommendations at
the May 26, 1992, Reconvened Board of Review. The
Council will take action on the total assessment at the
May 26, 1992, Meeting.
AGENDA
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNKSOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIl.
REGULAR MEETING
FOLLOWING THE BOARD OF REVIEW, MAY 12, 1992
CITY COUNCIl. CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 28, 1992 REGULAR
MEETING. PG. 1316-1328
CASE NO. 92-009 & 92-010: RICHARD OLEXA, 6607
BARTLETT BLVD., LOT 9 & W 1/2 OF LOT 10,
HALSTED HEIGHTS, PID #22-117-24 43 0012.
MINOR SUBDIVISION & VARIANCES. PG. 1329-1352
PRESENTATION OF 1992 FINANCIAL AUDIT AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1991 - GARY GROEN, ABDO, ABDO &
EICH. (REPORT WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TUESDAY
EVENING.)
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
1314
6e
PAYMENT OF BILLS
PG. 1353-1374
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
ae
Department Head Monthly Reports for April
1992. Pg. 1375-1407
Be
LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for
April 1992.
Ce
Planning Commission Minutes of
April 27, 1992
Pg. 1408-1413
D. LMCD mailings.
Pg. 1414-1418
Ee
1992 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
(AMM) Annual Meeting, will be held Wednesday,
May 20, 1992, Radisson Hotel, St. Paul. See
information for details. If interested in
attending, please contact Fran ASAP. Pg. 1419-1422
Fo
Per our settlement with Law Enforcement
Labor Services (LELS - Sergeants), we
received a letter of resignation from
Sergeant Brad Roy who has been with the
city of Mound for 29 1/2 years.
Pg. 1423
Ge
Letter from local residents to Jon
Sutherland, Building Official, thanking
him for his assistance during their recent
variance request. Pg. 1424
He
REMINDER: Annual Parks Tour - Thursday,
May 21, 1992.
REMINDER: LMC Annual Conference is scheduled
for June 9-12, 1992, Bloomington.
Contact Fran is you are interested in
attending.
1315
April 28, 1992
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 28, 1992
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, April 28, 1992, in the Council Chambers
at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Ken Smith. Also present
were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark,
City Attorney Curt Pearson, Building Official Jon Sutherland, Park
Director Jim Fackler, Dock Inspector Tom McCaffrey, Fire Chief Don
Bryce, and the following interested citizens: Nancy Nordstrom,
Nancy Hoy, Jim Krenik, Phil & Eva Hasch, Marilyn Byrnes, Robert
Carlson, Gen Carlson, Dorothy Caster, Mike Mason, Jayne Hetchler,
Rich Peterson, Denny Flack, Steve Cooper, Dick Olexa, Jim Bedell,
Gene Garvais, Shirley Andersen, Cathy Bailey, Mary Motyka, Carl
Alexander, Joanne Champine, Keith Foerster, Jim Kuehn, Dean Hanus,
Sandi Effertz, Geoff Michael, Tom Casey, Charles Chase, Mark Hanus,
Archie Hanus, Fred Schmudlach, Gene Smith, Gretchen Smith, Greg
Knutson, Becky Cherne, Rodney Beystrom, John Gabos, Alan Greene,
Brian Asleson, Bill Meyer, Mike Mueller, Richard Indritz, Carole
Munson, Larry Hauskins, and Richard Saliterman.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
1.0 MINUTES
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to approve the
Minutes of the April 14, 1992, Regular Meeting and the April
21, 1992, Committee of the Whole Meeting, as submitted. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.1 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK, MAY 4-8,
1992 IN THE CITY OF MOUN~
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following proclamation:
RESOLUTION #92-41 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WESTONKA SENIOR
CENTER WEEK MAY 4-8, 1992
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.2
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY ATTORNEY,S SUMMARY, PROPOSED ORDINANCE
ADDING SECTION 495 RELATING TO THE REQUIREMENT OF OBTAINING ~
LICENSE TO RENT HOUSINGm PROPOSED RENTAL HOUSING MAINTENANCE
ORDINANCE (CHAPTER 319)
The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has been
55
April 28, 1992
working on this for a number of years. Section 495 relates to
Licensing of Rental Housing and Section 319 relates to Housing
Maintenance Regulations for Rental Housing.
The Building official reviewed the Executive Summary of the two
proposed sections. The purpose of the ordinances is to maintain
the housing stock in the community and have people live in a
habitable home.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
JIM BEDELL, Z6Z$ Wilshire Blvd. stated he feels that rental
homes and owner occupied homes will be treated differently if
these ordinances are adopted. He thought landlords input
should have been incorporated in these ordinances. He did not
agree with all items in these ordinances, i.e. paved driveways
and snow removal.
Councilmember Jensen stated that the City does not want to intrude
upon the accepted contractual relationship between tenant and
landlord. She further stated that the Planning Commission did
discuss items that were brought up by landlords at the June 25,
1991, public hearing. There was impasse on some of those items.
The city Attorney stated he feels there are some things that need
to be addressed before these ordinances are adopted, i.e. how the
inspection process will be implemented (providing the time and
people to carry out these ordinances), and a fee structure.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to adjourn the
public hearing until the June 23, 1992, Council Meeting, to
provide Staff the time to prepare a fee structure and a plan
for how the inspection process will be implemented. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.3
CASE NO. 92-005: FRED SCHMUDL~CH, 6248 RED OAK ROAD, LOT 7,
BLOCK 1, MOUND TERRACE, PID ~14-117-24 32 0007. VARIANCE FOR
AN ADDITION
The Building Official explained the request.
Commission recommended approval unanimously.
The Planning
Ahrens moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %92-42
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE
RECOGNIZING EXISTING NONCONFORMING
SETBACKS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
CONFORMING ADDITION AT 6248 RED OAK ROAD,
LOT 7, BLOCK 1, MOUND TERRACE, PID %14-
117-24 32 0007t P & Z CASE 92-005
56
1317
The vote was unanimously in favor.
April 28, 1992
Motion carried.
NO. 92-006:
1.4
LAFAYETTE PARK~
PID~
NANCY NORDSTROMt 5308 THREE POINTS BLVD. t
13-117-24 21 0041,
PART OF LOT 22m
VARI]tNCE - DECK
The Planning
The Building official explained the request.
Commission recommended approval on a 5 to 2 vote.
Councilmember Jessen asked if the applicant planned to make a turn
around space in the driveway so that people did not have to back
onto Three Points Blvd. The applicant answered yes.
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO DECKS AT 5308 THREE
POINTS BLVD. v PART OF LOT 22m L~FAYETTE
PARK~ PID #13-117-24 21 0041, P & Z CASE
#92-006
RESOLUTION %92-43
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.5 C~E NO. 92-007: MARK HANUS, 4446 DENBIGH ROAD, LOT 1, BLOCK
le AVALON~ PID ~19-117-23 24 0001~ V/%RIANCE - ADDITION
The Building official explained the request. The Planning
Commission recommended approval unanimously.
Councilmember Smith questioned the first condition granting the
variance "contingent upon the removal of the existing nonconforming
detached garage by May 28, 1993". He asked that the applicant be
asked to enter into an agreement with the city that would guarantee
that the garage would be removed or the city could enter the
property, remove the garage, and assess the costs to the property
owner.
The city Attorney suggested the following language change in #1
under the Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved: ,' ..... contingent upon
the preparation and execution of a recordable agreement that the
City can enter the property, remove the existing nonconforming
garage and specially assess the costs against the owner if it is
not removed by May 28, 1993". The Council agreed to the amendment.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %92-44 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING ADDITION AT
4446 DENBIGH ROAD, LOT 1, BLOCK 1,
57
April 28, 1992
AVALONt PXD #19-117-23 24 0001,
CABB #92-007t AB AN.ENDED
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Mr. Hanus asked to comment on a Staff policy. A permit was issued
to a neighbor for reroofing. The structure is nonconforming as far
as the side setback and is also encroaching on Mr. Hanus' property.
He contacted the Building Dept. and the Building Official's opinion
is that it is a personal issue between the two property owners and
that he was not going to revoke the permit.
The Building Official stated that the carport that is encroaching
was done without a permit sometime ago. He further stated that he
has notified the neighbor, Mr. Pflug that he will have to remove
the encroachment.
The City Attorney stated that if a survey was brought to the City
showing an encroachment on another's property a permit should not
be issued, but this was not the case for Mr. Pflug. Apparently the
part Mr. Hanus is speaking about has been re-roofed and 'this is an
after the fact item. The Council at this point cannot establish a
policy, it will have to be on a case by case basis. If the Council
wishes, they could refer the policy matter to the staff and
attorney for review and bring it back. Otherwise it will be
between Mr. Hanus and his neighbor.
No further action was taken.
1.6
~ASE NO. 92-008~ CHARLES CHASE, JR., 3048 HIG~L~qND BLVD.~
LOTS 13, 14, 15, BLOCK 2, ~ HIGHLANDS, PID #23-117-24 44
9005. VARIANCE - BOATaOUSE
The Building Official reported that the applicant is requesting a
variance to Section 330:15 to allow construction of a boathouse
with the lowest floor 1 foot below the required minimum floor
elevation of 933.5 for Lake Minnetonka. Staff recommended denial
at the Planning Commission based on the strong wording of the Code.
The Planning Commission recommended approval on a 4 to 3 vote based
on the fact that the boat house ,,use'' is other than "habitable,, and
it is an "accessory use" versus a "principal use".
In the City Planner's report a number of communities were surveyed
to see what their minimum floor elevations are and they range from
931.5 to 934.0. Mound is currently preparing a new floodplain
ordinance and a new shoreland ordinance. The State or Federal
governments require one foot of elevation above the 100-year
contour. The Minnehaha Watershed District recommends that
communities require at least 2 feet above the 100-year contour.
58
April 28, 1992
The Building Official further stated that in his opinion the boat
house is new construction, it is not simply the repair of an
existing facility. The contractor stated that when he started to
repair the original boathouse, the ~ fell in and he proceeded
to pour a new slab and put the newts up. Since the building
is not complete, it is still possible to raise the existing floor
one foot to comply with the required 933.5 elevation.
By raising the minimum floor elevation above the 100-year flood, we
would be providing a measure of flood protection for the structure.
One foot seems to be a minimum, but a number of cities and the
watershed district recommend two feet which provides an additiona1
measure of protection.
Mr. Chase addressed the Council and stated that the same footings
are being used and the boathouse is at the same elevation it has
been at since it was originally constructed and has been that way
for at least the last 28 years. The Watershed District was out and
felt it was o.k. He stated that the boathouse has been through two
100-year storms in the last 20 years and there was no water up to
or near the structure.
Ahrens moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #92-45 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
SECTION 330~15, SUBD. 10 OF THE MOUND
CODE OF ORDINANCES RELATING 'TO MINIMUM
FLOOR ELEVATION FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF A
BOATHOUSE AT 3048 HIGHLAND BLVD., LOTS
13t 14t 15~ BLOCK 2~ THE HIGHLANDS, PID
#23-117-24 44 0005, P & Z CASE #92-008
Councilmembers Jensen and Jessen stated they would have to vote
against approval because it does not meet the required elevation
requirement.
The vote was 3 in favor with Jensen and Jessen voting nay Motion
carried. ·
1.7
CASE NO. 92-009 & 92-010: RICHARD OL~XA, 6607
BARTLETT BLVD., LOT 9 & W 1/2 OF LOT 10,
.HALSTED hEIGHTS, PID #22-117-24 43 0012.
Mi~OR SUBDIVISION & VARIANCE~
The Building Official reported for the City Planner explaining that
the applicant is proposing to move a property line that was
approved previously in a minor subdivision. The Planning
Commission recommended approval on a 6 to 1 vote with conditions.
59
April 28, 1992
The city Attorney pointed out that there is a platted street
(Halsted Lane) that comes from the west in Halsted View. He
questioned whether a street easement is necessary on Mr. Olexa's
lots to extend Halsted Lane. The other question was about a water
easement that is required by the proposed resolution. The Attorney
recommended that this item be referred to the City Engineer and the
City Planner for further revieW.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by &hrens to table this item
to the May lZth meeting after the proper easement or easements
are obtained from Mr. Olexa. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
1.8 COMMENTS ]tND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
Nancy Hoy, 2146 Cardinal Lane - stated she would like to see the
Council find out what the real cause is as to why people are not
getting Building Permits before doubling and tripling permit fees.
Also felt landlords should be allowed to comment on the rental
housing ordinances.
Jim Kuehn, 4633 Island View Drive - stated he would like an
improved understanding of the policies and the commitment to help
all commons users. He represents citizens for Commons' Sense and
stated they would like to be involved in the decision making
processes of the following:
,,* Commons' Policies
Translate commons' policies into simple english.
Examine the appropriateness of specific commons'
policies, administration and categories.
Make changes.
* Re-examine the Docks Program
To include fee structure, locations, and other
concerns.
* Commons' Property Tax Reform
Promote an equitable property tax system, clearly
defining differences between private lakeshore and
commons' lakeshore.
* Budget Accountability
Line item accountability as it relates to commons'
programs.
* Enhance the public image of the City of Mound."
The Council thanked the people who commented and suggested that the
Staff and the Council hold another presentation session for the
realtors in the area and inform them about commons. They also
suggested have the Citizens for Commons' Sense meet with the Staff
and Council and discuss their concerns.
6O
April 28, 1992
Alan Greene, 2645 Casco Point Road~ Orono - was a resident of
Mound for 20 years and is the former Chairman of the Park
Commission in the mid 1960's to mid 1970's. He commented on the
study that was done on the common's at that time. He explained
that the study was precipitated because there were 3 groups of
people out there then:
1. Inlanders who wanted to use the commons.
2. Residents abutting the commons who felt they were being
encroached upon, particularly their privacy.
3. Residents abutting the commons who were very dissatisfied
with what people were doing on the commons, i.e. leaving
docks in all year and leaving debris on the commons.
He then gave the background of why and how the dock ordinance came
about. He explained that he was on the Park Commission when the
survey of the commons was done to determine what structures were on
the commons. At that time, the structures were grandfathered in
but it was not the intention that the structures be allowed to stay
indefinitely.
Greg Knutson, 4701 Island View Drive - asked who is respOnsible for
the structure on the commons abutting your property. The City
Attorney stated that if the structure is there legally, it should
have a maintenance permit, otherwise it should not be there, and if
it has a maintenance permit it runs with the land so it transfers
from one ownership to the next.
Keith Foerster, 4645 Island View Drive - feels that the City needs
to address all properties with housing maintenance, not just rental
housing.
Jayne Hetchler, 4913 Island View Drive - hopes that there will be
recognition of the different types of commons.
1.9 .RECOMMENDATIONS FROM PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION RE:
PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR LARRY HAUSKINSt 174~
~LO~BIRD LANE, WIOTA COMMONS, DOCK SITE #13480 - TRIMMING OF
VEGETATION
The Park Director explained that this is an after the fact permit.
The Park & Open Space Commission recommended approval on an 8 to 1
vote.
Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %92-46
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS -
LAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR TRIMMING OF
TREES AND VEGETATION AT WIOTA COMMONS
ABUTTING 1749 BLUEBIRD LANE, LOTS 13 &
14t BLOCK 9t DREAMWOODt DOCK SITE #13480
61
April 28, 1992
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.10 R~QUEST FROM MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION TO
INCREASE MONTHLY PENSION BENEFIT
The City Manager explained that the Mound Fire Dept. Relief
Association has had an actuarial study done on their pension fund.
They are now requesting a $25.00 increase in their pension
benefits. This would be a raise from $395.00 per month to $425.00
per month. He further indicated that the present level of
contribution from the State, fire contract cities and pension fund
investments will cover the proposed increase.
Johnson moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #92-47
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RELIEF
ASSOCIATION'S REQUEST TO INCREASE PENSION
BENEFITS AS REQUESTED
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.11 ~VIEW OF I{AZARDOUS BUILDING (BOATHOUSE) ON PUBLIC LANDS
(DEVON COMMONS) t 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, CAROLE MUNSON
The Building Official reviewed his report on the dilapidated boat
house. The Staff recommends the following:
OPTION #1 - The city Council direct staff and the City
Attorney to proceed with removal of the boathouse due to its
unsafe condition on public land. OR
OPTION #2 - Allow the applicant continued use of the boathouse
until the expiration of the current maintenance permit on
December 10, 1994, upon the condition that the structure be
restored to a safe condition by the applicant. The applicant
shall submit a detailed list of corrections that address the
concerns as listed by the Building Official in his report.
Carole Munson was present and stated she feels comfortable with the
boathouse as is. She requested that the Council stand by their
decision on December 10, 1991, and honor the 3 year maintenance
permit that was issued.
The Council discussed the boathouse; the maintenance permit; what
repairs to allow, if any; and the removal of the boathouse at the
end of the maintenance permit period.
The question is whether or not to repair the boathouse. The
Building Official recommended that the applicant get a qualified
person to review the building. The applicant stated she did
intend to do some minimal things to the building, but no major
62
April 28, 1992
improvements.
The Council explained that the maintenance permit was to allow use
to the extent of the useful life of the structure.
The City Attorney gave the following analogy:
1. The building Official has recommended removal on the
basis of, it is his opinion that the building is
hazardous.
2. The Council is saying no, we've given a permit and we're
going to live with that permit for the balance of the
three year period. The Council is also asking the
Building Official what needs to be done to the building
to make it safe.
3. The Building Official is saying here are some things he
can think of off the top of his head but essentially he
does not want to be responsible to redesign her building.
The City Attorney suggested that the Council defer action on this
item for 2 weeks and let the Building Official work with the
applicant and whoever her representative is to do what the Council
is basically saying, i.e. do the minimal work to protect the
health, safety and welfare of anybody who may be in or around that
building for the 3 year period. At that time, it should come back,
and an agreement be drawn between the City and Ms. Munson that:
1. There be insurance to protect she and the City.
2. It should contain language which would require its
removal at the end of the permit period, at her expense.
Another question that needs to be addressed is: Does the City want
to require people to record these permit documents on their title,
which is the only way persons buying the property would have
official notice?
MO~N_~ad~ by Jessen, seconded by Smith to table this item
un~ll the 4une ~th Meeting, in order to give Ms. Munson time
to have a building contractor look at the building and meet
with the Building Official to do the minimum to make the
building safe. The vote was unanlmously in favor. Motion
carried.
1.12 REOUEST FROM RICHARD INDRITZ, ATTORNEY, ON BEHALF OF CAROr.~:
MUNSON, 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIva TO RECONSIDER APPLICATION FOk
pERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LANDS
Mr. Richard Indritz, Attorney for Ms. Munson, addressed the Council
asking for reconsideration of the Council's decision of December
10, 1991, requiring the removal of the deck that was built last
year. Her contention is the same as it was back in December, the
construction of this deck was just maintenance of an existing
structure. He suggested that other people have been given after
63
April 28, 1992
the fact permits for decks on commons, i.e. the Konnads.
Ms. Munson showed an overhead of the Commons with the deck,
boathouse, stairway and playhouse. She stated she will need a
walkway between the two sets of steps and therefore will need the
deck to attach these steps to.
There was discussion on other alternatives: 1. Landscaping, terracing and leaving the area open.
2. Steps can be built without having a deck to attach it to.
Tom Casey, Park & Open Space Commission, stated that the scenic
value of the property has been diminished because something is
built on it. There is habitat that is being compromised because
trees and shrubs are not there. Erosion control may be another
item that has not been addressed.
Bill Meyer, Planning Commission stated: Since it is an accessory
building and is not on her property don't the same rules have to be
followed as someone would if building an accessory building on
their own property, i.e. setbacks, etc. He did not know when the
City ever allowed an accessory building to be built without meeting
the setbacks, etc.
Mike Mueller, 5910 Ridgewood Road stated: That the structures were
there before the applicant owned the property. If they are on City
property the City should maintain them or pay to remove the
structures.
The Council reminded Mr. Mueller that the issue is the deck not the
structures. The deck was added by the applicant since she
purchased the property.
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Smith to amend the motion
approved On December 10, 1991, to include the deck as part of
the 3 year Maintenance Permit, thus deleting the portion of
the motion which required that the deck be removed within 6
months of the date of that Meeting or June 10, 1992.
The Council clarified that the permit given to Sandra Konnad
was for Construction of Public lands, after the fact, not a
Maintenance Permit.
The vote was 2 in favor with Jensen, Jessen and Johnson voting
nay. Motion fails.
Johnson moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %92-48
RESOLUTION TO ISSUE A CONSTRUCTION ON
PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT, (FEE WAIVED), TO
64
~4~ril 28, 1992
CAROLE MUNSONv 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIVEr TO
ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WALKWAY TO
CONNECT THE TWO STAIRWAYS ON THE COMMONS,
TO BE BUILT ACCORDING TO CODE.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The Building Official asked that the applicant submit a sketch plan
of how the two stairways will be connected and a permit will be
issued.
1.13 RESOLUTION APPROVING STAFF RECOMMENDATION - STATES SALES TAY
~PPLICATION ON LOCAL GOVE_PJ;N~NT PURCHASE~
The City Manager explained that the Legislature has approved the
application of the State's 6.5% sales tax to local government
purchases. This was passed in lieu of the cuts in Local Government
Aid. This will mean the City must cover approximately $12,000-
$15,000 in sales tax for the remainder of this year. The City
Manager has proposed the following personnel changes within the
Police Department and the Parks Department to cover the amount:
1. Retirement of Sergeant Brad Roy, effective July 1, 1992,
with realize a savings of $9,000.
2. Retirement of Bob Johnson and not replacing his position
will realize a savings of $4,000.
Councilmember Ahrens disagreed with the proposal by not replacing
the position in the Parks Dept.
The Council discussed maintaining the Park services at the present
level and not replacing Mr. Johnson.
Smith moved and Jensen Seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #92-49
RESOLUTION APPROVING STAFF RECOMMENDATION
TO COVER STATE'S SALES TAX APPLICATION ON
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURCHASES
The vote was 4 in favor with Ahrens voting nay. Motion carried.
1.14 APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS
The City Clerk explained the proposed ordinance amendments.
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following:
ORDINANCE #56-1992
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 800:10, SUBD.
6 & 7; SECTION 800:25; SECTION #810:10,
SUBD. 2, (C); SECTION 810:25; AND
REPEALING SECTION 810:30, SUBD. 4 OF THE
65
April 28, 1992
CITY CODE RELATING TO LIQUOR LICENSING
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.X5 APPROVAL OF LICENSES
The City Clerk presented the following licenses for approval all
conditioned upon all required forms, insurance, etc. being
submitted.
Mound Volunteer Fire Dept. Fish Fry - June 13, 1992
Temporary On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor
Public Dance Permit - Waive Fee
Temporary Set-Up Permit - Waive Fee
Mound City Days - June 19, 20, & 21, 1992 - all fees waived
Carnival Entertainment
Concessions Fireworks
Craft Fair Merchant Sales
Parade Public Gathering
Northwest Tonka Lions - Mound City Days - June 20 & 21, 1992
Temporary On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor Permit
2 locations as follows:
1. June 20 & 21, 1992 - Pond Arena
2. June 21, 1992 - Mound Bay Park
Temporary Set-Up Permit - Waive Fee
Public Dance Permit - Waive Fee
Our Lady of the Lake Church - July 25 & 26, 1992 - Incredible
Festival
Temporary On-Sale Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor
Public Dance Permit
Temporary Set-Up Permit - Waive Fee
Mohawk Jaycees Fundraiser - May 1, 1992 - American Leqion
Public Dance Permit - Waive Fee
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Smith to authorize the
issuance of the above licenses as presented. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of
$189433.12, when funds are available. A roll call vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
66
ao
Be
C.
D.
E.
F®
March 1992 Financial
Finance Director.
Report as
April 28, 1992
prepared by John Norman,
LMCD mailings.
Information from Hennepin Parks on Redistricting.
REMINDER: Annual Parks Tour - Thursday, May 21, 1992.
LMC Annual Conference is scheduled for June 9-12,
Bloomington. Contact Fran if you are interested in
attending.
1992,
Park Minutes of April 9, 1992.
Planning Commission Minutes of April 13, 1992.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at 12:30
A.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
67
Hoisington Group Inc.
LAND USE CONSULTANTS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mound City Council and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: May 5, 1992
SUBJECT: Olexa Subdivision, Case #92-009 and 92-010
At the City Council meeting on April 28, 1992, action on the Olexa
subdivision was tabled pending investigation of easement issues. The
discussion at the City Council meeting focused on two types of easements:
1) a utility easement for water and 2) road easements (or right-of-way) to
provide future street access in the area. Since the last meeting, the City
Engineer has worked with Mr. Olexa to prepare and execute an easement
agreement for the existing water line. Under the terms of John Cameron's
recommendations, Mr. Olexa is to file the watermain easement at the time
that the subdivision is filed with Hennepin County. Therefore, the issue of
the watermain easement has been addressed.
The second issue pertains to a possible easement or right-of-way for the
easterly extension of Halsted Avenue. This issue was addressed in the
Comment section' of the staff Planning Report dated April 7, 1992. That
report expressed concern about the size of possible future lots should a
street extension occur in the future. It sought to guarantee that suitable
land is available to create conforming lots, it did not recommend
acquisition of an easement or dedicated right-of-way at this time.
The possible extension of Halsted Avenue is not a new issue in the City of
Mound. A review of the half section map for the area (Exhibit 1) identifies
that past Planning Commissions and City Councils have not only reviewed
the issue but have approved subdivisions that have actually contained
dedicated right-of-way for the road. The Halsted View subdivision
includes Halsted Avenue. Furthermore, in 1989, the owner of Lots 1, 2,
and 3 which abut the exiting terminus of Halsted Avenue submitted an
application to create a single-family lakefront lot, south of the extension of
Halsted Avenue. The application was withdrawn before it was reviewed
by the Planning Commission. Additionally, Lots 4 and 5 were divided in
7401 Metro Blvd. · Suite 340 · Minneapolis. MN 55439 · (612) 835-9960
Olexa Subdivision
Page 2
the past to create parcel (8) which again, lies south of the extension of
Halsted Avenue. Due to existing topography, it would be virtually
impossible to extend Halsted Avenue east of the Olexa property. Up to the
Olexa property, however, the road is feasible from an engineering
perspective.
If the City of Mound is interested in securing the needed easement or
right-of-way to accommodate the extension of Halsted Avenue, the most
opportune time to do so is at the time of a proposed subdivision. In this
case, the land needed for the street would probably need to accommodate
a cul-de-sac since the continued extension of the street beyond the Olexa
property is virtually impossible.
At this point, two courses of action are possible:
The City Council could find that it is appropriate to secure an
easement or right-of-way for Halsted Avenue and request the City
Engineer to examine the area and formulate recommendations on the
location and size of such easement.
The City Council could affirm the original staff and Planning
Commission recommendation which does not require the applicant to
provide land for a future street at this time, however, it does
stipulate that Mr. Olexa is required to demonstrate that sufficient
land will be available to create conforming lots should the extension
of Halsted Avenue occur in the future.
g
Ronning Variance Request
Page 2
COMMENT~,,,x.T, he only way to remove the existing on'conforming setbacks
would be to e~.l' move or demolish the existin.~gT/st.ructure. The existin~
home is a_ su'~tantial structure which/is in good condition~
Correspondingly, the~xisting nonconforming/C~tbacks are likely to remain
well into the.,future.. ~Si~ce the new additi~s conform to required setbacks,
approval of the variance'~will not int~nSlfy the nonconforming aspects of
the property_.__ ~
RECOMMENDATION: Sta~rec°mmends approval of the front and side
yard variances noted above for th~ purpose of allowing the applicant to
construct the proposed, conformin~ '"additions
"tI~d~,,~a ~r~v~ff' o~°J~_.°_r~m]n~g ~a~ s.hown on the survey noted
~l°u~.~''u.-rl~'l~/~ J. /'k. ~onmng, Ownei~ 1717 F~nch Lane." If the Planning
t-.omm~ss~on ~/the _reque~t,~it is suggested that the following
Finding of .Fact be incorP?rated ~nto-t~ motion: In approving the
van~ances, the~Commission fin~ that the request is in
contormance ~~ 50_.61 of the Mo~d Code of Ordinances and
that the variances resul~/ from the ~c~'i~n"'o~'~he existing structure over
which the present owydr of the property had no ~ontrol and the prooosed
improvements will no/( intensify the existing noncon~m:ming aspects df the
property. // - ~,.~--o
RESOLUTION #92-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND
A VARIANCE FOR A LOT WITH NO STREET FRONTAGE AT
660? & 6609 BARTLETT BLVD., LOT 9 & W 1/2 OF LOT 10,
HALSTED HEIGHTS, PID #22-117-24 43 0012
P&Z CASE NUMBERS 92-009 & 92-010
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision proposed for Lot 9 and the
west half of Lot 10, Halsted Heights, PID $22-117-24 43 0012 has
been submitted in the manner required for platting of land under
City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 330 and under Chapter 462 of
the Minnesota State Statute and all proceedings have been duly
conducted thereunder; and
WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision requirements
contained in Section 330 of the City Code has been filed with the
City of Mound; and
WHEREAS, the applicant's request is to change a property line
that was previously established by a minor subdivision, the
proposed subdivision will shift the property line separating lots
one and two 80 feet to the south; and
WHEREAS, in reference to a potential long term plan of
extending Halstead Avenue through the proposed southern parcel, it
appears that two lots could be created out of what is now lot 2,
both of which would exceed 10,000 square feet in area; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 Single
Family Residential Zoning District which according to city Code
requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard
setback, 10 foot side yard setbacks, and a 15 foot rear yard
setback; and
WHEREAS, all setbacks to existing structures and lot area
will be conforming. Lot i will have an area of 19,500 square feet
and lot 2 will have an area of 28,600 square feet; and
WHEREAS, said request for waiver has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission, and approval was recommended with 6 voting in
favor and i opposed; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City does hereby approve a variance from the requirements
of Section 330:20 (A) 2 of the Mound Code of Ordinances to
allow a minor subdivision and does hereby grant a variance for
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
PAGE 2
CASE NO. 92-009 & 92-010
parcel 2 which does not have frontage on a public street. The
City does also hereby approve a waiver from the provisions of
Section 330 of the City Code and the request to subdivide
property of less than five acres, described as Lot 9 and the
West 1/2 of Lot 10, Halsted Heights, PID #22-117-24 43 0011 &
0012. Approval is contingent upon the following:
a. The applicant shall supply a sketch plan prepared by a
licensed land surveyor identifying the potential
extension of Halstead Avenue in an alignment consistent
with the platted location of the street in the Halsted
View Subdivision. If the corresponding land area lying
between the northerly line of the right-of-way and the
southerly line of lot 1 does not equal or exceed!10,000
square feet, the property line dividing lots / and 2
shall be shifted northward to add the app opriate
property to proposed lot 2. The aforementiojP~d~sketch
plan shall be submitted prior to the filing of the
subdivision with Hennepin County.
b. The Owner/applicant shall furnish documents, such as
title opinion or certificate of title, sufficient to
prepare a recordable easement for the existing City
watermain.
c. Upon execution of an easement document, the
owner/applicant shall have an easement placed of record
with Hennepin County. The City shall be furnished a copy
of the recorded document.
It is hereby granted to permit the subdivision as per the
following descriptions (see attached Exhibit "A"):
That part of Lot 9 and ..
'Halsted H 'o ,, . · ~he West half of Lot 10
North.as -- ? ..lying North.fly of a lin.
_ -~-'l m=ra~el with the Northerly line of said-~ot"~
zrom a point on the West line of said Lot 9 distant 260 feet
south from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 9, subject to
an easement for driveway purposes over the West 10 feet
thereof.
That part of Lot 9 an .
'Halsted Hei h ,, ' d t~e West half of Lot 10
g ts , lying Southerly of a line dra~
Northeasterly parallel w~th the Norther1 line o ·
from a point on the West line o~ o~ .-~ .... f.sa~d lots
south from the Nor[hw,----- - ---~ uuu ~ Uls=ant 260 feet
- ~ = . m o=~ uv~r =ne wes~ 10 feet
of that pa~t of said Lot 9 lying Northerly of said above
described l~ne.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
PAGE 3
CASE NO. 92-009 & 92-010
®
It is determined that the foregoing subdivision will
constitute a desirable and stable community development and it
is in harmony with adjacent properties.
The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of
this resolution to the applicant. The applicant shall have
the responsibility for filing this resolution in the office of
the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin
County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of
the City. The applicant shall also have the responsibility of
paying all costs for such recording.
This lot subdivision and variance is to be filed and recorded
within 180 days of the adoption date of this resolution.
133 '
MXNUT~8 OW & ~-~TZNG OF TNg
MOUND ~DVISOR¥ PI.~NNING CO~IsBION
April 13~ 1992
c~ss ~0, 92-909 & 92-0~0~ RICK~a00L~X~, sSo? ~?Lt~-z- BLVD.
~,OT ~ ~ ~ 1/~ OF LOT 10o I~LBTBD HgiG~8_~_~_D_~22.117_~q 43 001~
~NOR 8~DZV~SZON ~ V~CE~
City Planner, Mark Koeqler, reviewed the applicant,s request
change a property l[ne that was previously
su~ivision. The proposed su~ivision will established b~ a m~nor
shift the propert~ line
separattnq lots one and two ~0 feet to the south. ~t one will
have a~ area off 19,500 square feet and lo2 2 will have an area
28,600 square feet. This histor~ of the su~ivisions approved for
th~s property was reviewed.
The City Enqineer reviewed the application and expressed a concern
with the exist~nq wate~a~n that crosses the southerly parcel. An
easement is not refflected on the survey. If an easemenk document
does exist the applicant should furnish the City ~th a copy,
the document does not exists, he reco~ends that one ~ dedicated
as part of the su~ivision approval.
The Cit~ Planner addressed a potential lonq term plan of extendinq
Halstead Avenue 2hrouqh the proposed southern parcel. It appears
that two lots could be created out o~ what Is now lo2 2, ~th off
which would exceed 10,000 square feet in area.
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve a variance
from the requirements of Section 330:20 (A) 2 of the Mound Code of
Ordinances to allow the subject request to be processed as a minor
subdivision. It is further recommended that a variance be granted
for lot 2 which does not have frontage on a public street and that
the subdivision of lots i and 2 be approved in accordance with the
survey dated 2/13/92 subject to the following condition:
1. The applicant shall supply a sketch plan prepared by a
licensed land surveyor identifying the potential extension of
Malstead Avenue in an alignment consistent with the platted
location of the street in the Halsted View Subdivision. If
the corresponding land area lying between the northerly line
of the right-of-way and the southerly line of lot ! does not
equal or exceed 10,000 square feet, the property line dividing
lots 1 and 2 shall be shifted northward to add the appropriate
property to proposed lot 2. The aforementioned sketch plan
shall be submitted prior to the filing of the subdivision with
Hennepin County.
2. The Owner/applicant shall furnish documents, such as title
opinion or certificate of title, sufficient to prepare a
recordable easement for the existing City watermain.
3. Upon execution of an easement document, the Owner/applicant
shall have an easement placed of record with Hennepin County.
The City shall be furnished a copy of the recorded document.
Weiland questioned if the Sewer and Water assessments were current.
Staff will verify prior to the Council meeting.
Mueller expressed a concern relating the southerly lot not having
any frontage on an improved public right-of-way.
The applicant confirmed that he has not researched his abstract for
the water easement yet. Meyer expressed a concern for the
applicant relating to the fees involved to file the easement
document. Koegler commented that the City Engineer can create an
easement agreement by using the easement description for the
sanitary sewer from an existing Title Opinion or Certificate of
Title. The applicant will only have marginal filing fees, the city
will prepare the documents if the description is provided to use.
The City is trying to complete this task as inexpensively as
possible for all parties.
MOTION mede by Michael, seconded by Hanus to recommend
approval of staff recommendation for approval including
&ll conditions. Motion carried 6 to I. Those ia favor
were= Clapseddle, Weiland, ~eyer, N&nus, Jensen, and
Michael. Mueller was opposed.
Mueller commented that a new lot is being created which does not
front on an improved public right-of-way and he is not tn favor of
creating new nonconforming lots. He compared this request to that
of creating bottleneck lots and questioned if they are not similar.
This request will be heard by the Planning Commission on April 28,
1992.
/33
Hoisin ton Group Inc.
LAND USE CONSULTANTS
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: April 7, 1992
SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision and Variances
APPLICANT: Richard Olexa
CASE NUMBER: 92-009 and 92-010
HGI FILE NUMBER: 92-1p
LOCATION: 6607 Bartlett Boulevard
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 Single-family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing to change a property line that
was previously established in a minor subdivision request that was
approved in 1983. Under the current request, the property line separating
lots 1 and 2 will be shifted approximately 80 feet to the south to
accommodate construction of a new detached garage on lot 1. Lot 1 will
have an area of 19,500 square feet and lot 2 will have an area' of 28,600
square feet.
When the subdivision of this property was approved in 1981 and again in
1983, the request was processed .as a minor subdivision consistent with
the code that was applicable at the time. Under the current subdivision
ordinance that was adopted in 1986, the division does not qualify as a
minor subdivision because the proposed lot does not front on a public
street (Section 330:20 (A) 2). Therefore, in order to process the current
request as a minor division, a variance from the above referenced section
of the subdivision ordinance will have to be granted. A variance will also
7401 Metro Blvd. · Suite 340 · I9finneapolis. MN 5543g...(61.2) 835-g .g60
Olexa Planning Report
4/7/92
Page 2
be required since lot 2 will not front on a public street. Access to lot 2 will
be via an easement over lot 1.
COMMENT: On two previous occasions, the City of Mound found that a
division creating either two or three lots was appropriate for the subject
site. The current request which is very similar to the 1983 approval
creates two lots, one of which does not have frontage on a public street.
Since the request was approved previously and since on previous
occasions, the subdivision was processed as a minor division, approval of
the variances and subdivision is in order.
The current request raises the issue of street access to the southern end of
the parcel. Long term, the City may desire to extend Halstead Avenue
through the properties in this area to provide street access. If Halstead
Avenue was extended with a 50 foot width through the subject property, it
appears that two lots could be created out of what is now lot 2, both of
which would exceed 10,000 square feet in area. This conclusion has been
reached utilizing half-section information combined with the applicants
current survey. Due to scale, the accuracy of this information is
questionable.
It is in the City's best long term interest to see that conforming lots could
be created in this area if the street extension ever occurs. Therefore, the
applicant's surveyor could accurately project the right-of-way and
calculate the corresponding lot area for the land lying north of the street
extension. If the resulting lot is less than 10,000 square feet, the line
separating proposed lots 1 and 2 could be shifted to the north thereby
creating a future conforming parcel if an extension of Halstead Avenue
occurs.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve a variance from the requirements of Section 330:20 (A) 2 of the
Mound Code of Ordinances to allow the subject request to be processed as a
minor subdivision. It is further recommended that a variance be granted
for lot 2 which does not have frontage on a public street and that the
subdivision of lots 1 and 2 be approved in accordance with the survey
dated 2/13/92 subject to the following condition:
· The applicant shall supply a sketch plan prepared by a licensed land
surveyor identifying the potential extension of Halstead Avenue in an
alignment consistent with the platted location of the street in the Halsted
View subdivision. If the corresponding land area lying between the
northerly line of the right-of-way and the southerly line of lot 1 does not
Olexa Planning Report
4/7/92
Page 3
equal or exceed 10,000 square feet, the property line dividing lots 1 and 2
shall be shifted northward to add the appropriate property to proposed lot
2. The aforementioned sketch plan shall be submitted prior to the filing of
the subdivision with Hennepin County.
NOTE: The City Engineer has prepared a letter discussing additional issues
relative to this case. Recommendations contained within the City
Engineer's letter should be incorporated into the Planning Commission's
recommendations.
Frank RoDs Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
April 7, 1992
RECEIVED
APR 8 1992
MOUND PLANNJN G & INSP.
Telephone Engineers
612/476-6010Planners
612/476-8532 FAX Surveyors
Mr. Jon Sutherland
Planning and Zoning
City of Mound
53~1Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Jon:
SUBJECT:
City of Mound, Minnesota
Minor Subdivision
Richard 01exa Property
Lots 9 and 10, Halstead Heights
Case #92-009 - MFRA #8902
As requested, we have reviewed the above proposed subdivision and have the
following comments and recommendations. This area has been the subject of
various proposals over the years, including the possible extension of Halstead
Avenue. The City Planner, Mark Koegler, will address the impact of a street
extension in his report.
I have two concerns regarding the survey furnished, dated February 13,
1992. It shows the existing property descriptions as three separate parcels;
however, Hennepin County's tax records show this property as two parcels which
coincide with the subdivision approved in 1981 under Resolution No. 81-270. It
does not appear that the subdivision created in 1983 by Resolution No. 83-61
was ever recorded.
The second problem is with the existing watermain that crosses the
southerly parcel. The original construction plan shows this watermain located
within a 9-foot wide easement adjacent to the north side of the sanitary sewer
easement. The survey Furnished with this request does not show an easement for
the watermain. If indeed the easement does exist, the City should be furnished
a copy of the document and if there is not an easement of record, we would
recommend that one be dedicated as part of this approval.
us. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
JC:jmj
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
An Equal Oooortunity Employer
Application for
MINOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND.
City of Mound
534L Maywood Roa~v Moun~v MN 55364
Phone.' 472-0600~ Fax: 472-0620
Planning Commission Date:~
City Council Date:~
Site visit Scheduled:
Ca...o. °009
Application Fee:_
Escrow Deposit:
Deficient Unit Charges?
Delinquent Taxes?
$50.00
Zoning Sheet Completed:_ ~-~&~--q~--
Copy to City Planner: ~ /~]~ ..
Copy to Public Works:-
Copy to City Engineer~__ VARIANCE REQUIRED?
Other:
Please type or print the following information:
Address of Subject Froperty f ' O
~ner' s N~e ~ %~ ~ ~C~ ~~
Applicant' s N~e (if other than owner)~~
Day Phone
Address
N~eof Surveyor:_ CO'-Cb ~
Day Phone
N~e of Engineer:
LEG~ DESCRIPTION:
~o~ ~~~ ~.%~%~ ~o. ~ ~q ~ ~% oo~
application ever been made fo~oning, variance, conditional use permit, or other
Has an procedure for this property? (~es, ( ) no. If Fes, list date(s) of application,
zoning
action taken, resolution nu~er(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
This applicatiom must be signe~b~ all o~ers of the s~ject property, or an explanation
given why this is not the case.
signature of o~er
Signature of owner
Date
VARIANCE APPLICATIOi'~
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0600, Fax~ 472-0620
lanning Commission Date:
City Council Date:
Site Visit Scheduled:
Application Fee: $50.00
Case No. ~-~
Zoning Sheet Completed:
Copy to City Planner: -
Copy to Public Works: ..~. -u -
Copy to City Engineer:
eeeeeeeeeeee®Oeeeeoeeeeeeeeeeee®
®ee®ee®eeeeeeeeeo.eoeeeeoeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Please t2pe or print the following information:
Owner's Name_ ~(~4~-(
Owner's Address~~
Applicant,s Name (if other than owner) ~;~__
Address
Day Phone
Block
0011
'~EGAL DESCRIPTION:
Zoning District Use of Property:
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If
yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and
provide copies of resolutions.
TYPE OF STRUCTURE VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR: ( ) elling ( ) Garage
Other
Detailed descripton of pr°posed.construction or alteration (size n
of stories, type of use, etc : . , her
Variance Application
Page 2
Case No. ~Z--Ol(~)
2. DO the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setb~,,~k regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes ;~, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe
reas6n~for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc. )~1~,o~
required requested VARIANCE
setback setback
Front Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Lake Front: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Lot size: sq ft sq ft sq ft
Does the present use of the property conform to ~)regulations for the
zoning district in which it is located? Yes , No ( ). If no,
specify eachnon-conforminguse:
®
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) to0 small I.~ drainage ( ) existing
( ) too shallow . shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe:
5. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having
property inter,ets in .the land after the zoning Drdinanqe wa.s adop~,d
(1982)? Yes ~, No ~. If yes, explain
Variance Application
Page 3
man-made change, such as the
Was the hardship created by any~.er
relocation of a road? Yes (), No If yes, explain
®
Are the conditions of hardship for which you ~equest a variance p.~;liar
only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No ~. If
no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate.
I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application
by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of
inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be
.equired by law.
Applicant' s Signature
Date
qz-oocl
I~d.
~ CO'
PROPOSED LOT DIVISION FOR
.RICHARD A. OLEXA
IN LOTS g & 10. HALSTED HEIGHTS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
This sorvey thaws the location of oil existing butldinqs tm relation
to tho boufld&ries o! the above described property. It does not purport
Certificate of Survey
for Richard A. Olexa
in Lots 9 and 10, Nalsted Heights
Hennepin County, Minnesota
I.hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre-
sentation of a survey of the boundaries of:
A/ .That part of Lot 9 and the West half of I~ot 10,
"Halsted Heights", lying Northerly of a line drawn
Northeasterly parallel with the Northerly line of
said lots from a point on the West line of said
Lot 9 distant 210 feet South from the Northwesterly
corner of said 'Lot 9, subject to an easement for
driveway purposes over the West 10 feet thereof;
_B/ That..part of Lot 9 and the West ..half of Lot 10,
::Halsted:Heights", lying Southerly of a line drawn
Northea. sterly parallel with the Northerly line of
said lots from a point on the West line of said
Lot 9 distant 210 feet South from the Northwesterly
corner of said Lot 9, together with' an easement
for driveway purposes over the West 10 feet of that
part of said Lot 9 lying Northerly of said above-
described 'parallel line,
and the locatio~ of all existing buildings thereon.
It does not pur.port to show other improvements or
encroachments.
GORDON R. COFFIN CO., INC.
~o~don R. Coffin
Reg. No. 6064
Mark S. Gronberg Reg. No.12755
Land Surveyors and Planners
Long Lake, ¥~nnesota
Scale: 1" = 80'
Date of field'survey: 7-23-81
Dat~'of desbriptions and plat:
o : Iron marker
4-12-83
for P. ichard A~ Olexa
in Lots 9 10,
~ =~;~,~..~ ~or~erly l~e of said lots ~m a ~int on the West l~e of said
~ ~ ~t 9 dis~t 185 feet ~u~ ~om t~ ~rth~s~rly co.er of said
C
Lot 9, subject to an easement for drive~ay purposes over. the West
10 feet thereof;
B_/ That part of LOt 9 and th~ West half of Lot 10, ~alsted Heights,
lying Southerl~ of a line drawn Nor~heastarly parallel with the
Northerly Line of said Iota from a point on the ~est line of said
Lot 9 distant 185 feat;South from the North~stsrly corner of said
Lot 9, and lying Northerly of a line drawn Northeasterly parallel
with the Northerly line of said lots from a point on the West line
of said LOt. 9 distant 205 feet South from the Northwesterly corner
of said Lot 9, subject to an 'easement for driveway purposes over
the West 20 feet thereof;
Also the East 15 feet of that part of said West half of Lot 10
lying Southerly of a line drawn NOrtheasterly parallel with the
Northerly line of said lot from a point on the_ West line of said
lot distant 205 feet South from the Northwesterly corner of said lot;
Also that part of said West half of LOt 10 lying West of said
above-descrihed East 15 feet, and South of a line dra~n West
perpendicular to the East line of said West half of Lot 10 from a
point on said East line of the West half distant 588.65 feet South
from the Northeast corner of said West half of Lot 10;
C_/ ~hat part of Lot 9 and the West half of Lot 10, Halsted Heights,
lying Southerly of a line drawn Northeasterly parallel with the
Northerly line of said _lots f~m a point on the West line of said
Lot ~ distant 205 feet South from the 'Northwesterly corner of said
Lot 9, said pa~rallel line being hereinafter referred to as "Line A"
together with an easement for driveway purposes over the West 10
feet of that part of ~aid LOt 9 lying Northerly of a line herein-
after referred to as "Line B", dra~n Northeasterly parallel with the
'Northerly line of said LOt 9 from a point on the West line of said
lot distant 185 feet South from the Northwesterly corner of said lot,
and an easement for drive~ay purposeS over the West 20 feet of that
part of LOt 9 ~ Northerly of said "Line A" and Southerly of
said "I~ B", EIEEPT the East 15 feet of that part of said West
half of Lot 10 lying Southerly of said "Line A"; ALSO EXCEPT that
part of said West half of Lot 10 lying West of said above-described
15 feet, and South of a line dra~n West perpendic,_;!-r to the East
line of said West half of Lot 10 from a point on said East line of
the West half distant 588.65 feet South from the Northeast corner
of said West half of Lot 10,
And the location of all existing buildings thereon. It does not
purport to show other improvements or encroachments.
Scale: 1" = 80'
Date : 7-23-81
o ~ Iron marker
Gordon R. Coffin Reg. ~o. 6064
Land Surveyor and ~.anner
Long Lake, ~innesota
April 19, 1983
Councilmember Peterson moved the followlng resolutlon.
RESOLUTION #83-61
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SUBDIVISION.AS
REQUESTED - THAT PART OF LOT 9 AND THE
WEST 1/2 OF LOT 10 LYING SOUTHERLY OF
NORTHERLY 185 FEET, HALSTED HEIGHTS
'PID #22-117-24 43 0011/0012
WHEREAS,
an application to waive the subdivision requirements contained in
Section 22.00 of the City Code has been filed with the City of
Mound, and
WHEREAS, said request for a waiver has been reviewed by the Planning
Commission and the City Council, and
WHEREAS,
it is determined that there are special circumstances affecting
said property such that the strict application of the ordinance
would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land;
that the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver
will not be detrimental to .the public welfare or injurious to
other owners:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MINNESOTA:
1)
That the request or'Richard A. Olexa for the waiver from the
provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code and the request
to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as
Lot 9 and West 1/2 of Lot lO, Halsted Hights, Plat 61605,
Parcels 1825 and 185, PID #22-117-24 43 OOll/O012 is approved
to be divided as follows:
PARCEL "A" - That part of Lot 9 and the West half of Lot 10,
"Halsted Heights", lying Northerly of a line drawn Northeasterly
parallel with the Norther llne of said lots from a point on the
West line of said Lot 9 distant 210 feet South from the North-
westerly corner of said Lot 9, subject to an easement for drive-
way purposes over the West 10 feet thereof;
PARCEL "B" - That part of Lot 9 and the West half of Lot 10,
"Halsted Heights", lying Southerly of a line drawn Northeasterly
parallel with the Northerly )ina of said lots from a point on the
West llne of said Lot 9 distant 210 feet South from the Northwesterly
corner of said Lot 9, together with an easement for driveway purposes
over the West 10 feet of that part of said Lot 9 lying Northerly of
said above described parallel llne.
2) That any deficiencies on said property resulting from division are
to be paid in full or waivers signed.
3) It is .determined that the foregoine division will constitute a desireable
and stable community development and is in harmony with adjacent
properties.
April 19, 1983
4)
The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of this
resolution to the applicant for filing in the office of the
Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County
to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City.
A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Paulsen and upon vote being taken thereon; the following voted
in favor thereof: .Charon, Paulsen, Pe;~?~ ap~.~p.~stpp.;_~.~p.l, lpwln[.~oted
against the same: none; with Councilmember Swenson absent and excused;'where-
upon said resolution was declared passed and adopted,.signed by the Hayor and
his signature attested by the City Clerk.
I~ayor
Attest: City Clerk
295
August 11, 1981
Councilmember Ulrlck moved the following resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 81-270
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION AS
REQUESTED - THAT PART OF LOT 9 & W.½ OF LOT 10
LYING SOUTHERLY AND NORTHERLY 185 FEET, HALSTEAD
HEIGHTS
WHEREAS,
an application to waive the subdivision requirements contained in
Section 22.00 of the City Code has been filed with the City of
Mound, and
WHEREAS, said request for a waiver has been reviewed by the Planning
Commission and the City Council, and
WHEREAS,
it is determined that there are special circumstances affecting
said property such that the strict application of the ordinance
would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land;
that the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver
will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other owners,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND,
MOUND, MINNESOTA:
That the request of Richard A. Oiexa for the waiver from the
provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code and the request
to subdivide property of less than five areas, described as
Lot 9 and West 1/2 of Lot 10, Halstead Heights, Plat 61605,
Parcels ]825 and 1850, PID #22-117-24 43 OOll/OO12 is
approved to be divided as follows:
NEW PARCEL 1 (Shown on survey as A & B): That part of
Lot 9 and the west half of Lot 10, Halstead Heights,
lying Northerly of a line drawn Northeasterly parallel
with the Northerly line of said lots from a point on the
West line of said Lot 9 distant 185 feet South from the
Northwesterly corner of said Lot 9, subject to an
easement for driveway purposes over the West 10 feet
thereof; that part of Lot 9 and the West half of Lot 10,
Halstead Heights, lying Southerly of a line drawn
Northeasterly parallel with the Northerly line of said
lots from a point on the West line of said Lot 9 distant
185 feet South from the Northwesterly corner of said
Lot 9, and lying Northerly of a line drawn Northeasterly
parallel with the Northerly line of said lots from a
point on the West line of said Lot 9 distant 205 feet
South from the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 9, subject
to an easement for driveway purposes over West 20 feet
thereof; also the East 15 feet of that part of said West
half of Lot 10 lying Southerly of a line drawn North-
easterly parallel with the Northerly line of said lot
from a point on the West line of said lot distant 205 feet
South from the Northwesterly corner of said lot; Also
1350
296
August 11, 1981
that part of said West half of Lot lO lying West of said
above-described East 15 feet, and South of a line drawn
West perpendicular to the East line of said West half of
Lot 10 from a point on said East line of the West half
distant 588.65 feet South from the Northeast corner of
said West half of tot 10.
NEW PARCEL 2 (Shown on survey as C): That part of Lot 9
and the West half of Lot 10, Halstead Heights, lying
Southerly of a line drawn Northeasterly parallel with the
Northerly line and said lots from a point on the West line
of said Lot 9 distant 205 feet South from the North-
westerly corner of said Lot 9, said parallel line being
hereinafter referred to as "Line A", together with an
easement for driveway purposes over the West l0 feet of
that part of said Lot 9 lying Northerly of a line herein-
after referred to as "Line B", drawn Northeasterly parallel
with the Northerly line of said Lot 9 from a point on the
West line of said lot distant 185 feet South from the
Northwesterly corner of said lot, and an easement for
driveway purposes over the West 20 feet of that part of
Lot 9 lying Northerly of said "Line A" and Southerly of
said "Line B", EXCEPT the East 15 feet of that part of
said West half of Lot 10 lying Southerly of said "Line A'I;
ALSO EXCEPT that part of said West half of Lot 10 lying
West of said above described 15 feet, and South of a line
drawn West perpendicular to the East line of said West
helf of Lot 10 from a point on said East line of the West
half distant 588.65 feet South from the Northeast corner
of said West half of Lot 10.
It is determined that the foregoing division will constitute a
desirable and stable community development and is in harmony
with adjacent properties.
3)
The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of this
resolution to the applicant for filing in the office of the
Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County
to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of this City.
A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Polston and upon vote being taken thereon: the following voted
in favor thereof: Charon, Polston, Swenson, Ulrick and Lindlan; the following
voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared passed
and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Manager.
Mayor
Attest: City Manager
BILLS
BATCH 2043
BATCH 2044
TOTAL BILLS
$210,605.20
102,769.73
$313,374.93
I '~$3
g .',i '0 ~.-
,O'
o
~ ~ o Io ',o o o o o ! ~ '.4. ~ ; ..t ,.~ o. i~ ~
~ ! ,! I I I I I
C , O00 ~ · ~I X
~II ,.,i ,., ,., ,., "~" ,,-,, -..-...-. ,- z,', ,--~
i I ; I! : I ~J I II.J,
n,- ~: I i0 I iO I 0 I .J .J--I I :
I--Z 0,. 0,, 0,. 7 ' I~.Z *,(iZ "(Z
2: ~0,0~, ~0 0'~ :00 'P- P.. ,0 ~1~.~ 0~· · · ~ lo · , .,e , 'I $ 1" · · ele
~ · · · "~ ' · · · · · · .00 ~ .-¢~aO1 ~0 ~'~ I~ aO~O
""" '' ' / /
i -,1 z i -,, I '-' t ',' ,,, ~
~. A o: ;~,.o (3..0 t3..o 13. o ~: A| o| g~o ! n, ~::~ Ao
Il.
S
o
I I' I
I
I I I
0
0
0
0
I
~4
!
~4
C3 Z
Z
t~J
!
Z ,4'
~ .,,4
'
,.-,4
O0
0
Z~ZZ~ZZZ
000000000~
i
OO
O0
O~
~4
13/,,7.
to
O0
0
Oo
,4'
!
!
0
0
~t
,4'
I
,.-4
0
~ooc
0
I
0
!
o~
000
I I
oo
I I
, I
I ! , I I I I I I I:
O0 ~'0000 0 0
I J I I I II
OO
!
0
c~
!
0
oo
o
0
'o
oO
0
!
OC
0
0
I
0
,0
I
~0
I I:
/-4
oo OC)
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA
FOR MONTH OF APRIL1992
FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE
4/13/ 4/~Q/ ~ ~ ~ P.~
1 JEFF ANUEP, S~ X X 2 I9.OO 34 6.OO
2 GREG ANDERSON X X 2 19.~
3 J~ ~B X X 2 ~9.~
4 0A~ ~ X X 2 ~9.~
5 ~ BR~ X X $ 19.~ 28 6.~
6 ~ B~ X X 2 ~9.~ 28 6.~
7 DAV~ <~ X X 2 19.~ 25 6.~ 150.~
8 Jm C~ X ~ 1 9.50 28 6.~
9 S~ C~'~'~ X X 2 19.~ )$ 6.~ 72.~
10 ~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 10 6.~ ~.~
11 S~ E~ X X 2 19.~ 22 6.~ 132.~
12 EL FI{ X X 2 19.~ 23 6.~ 1~.~
13 G~ ~V~S X X 2 19.~ 23 6,~ tE.~
14 D~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 31 6,~ 1~.~
15 ~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 22 6.~ 132.~
16 CEG ~~ X X 2 19.~ 33 6.~ 198.~
17 p~ ~Y X X 2 19.~ 18 6.~ 1~.~
18 B~ ~{ X Z 2 19.~ 25 6.~
19 R~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 22 6.25 137,}0
~ J~ ~S X X 2 19.~ 21 6.~ 126,~ ..
21 J~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 14 6.~ ~.~
22 ~V ~.~ X X 2 19.~ 20 6.~ 1~.~
23 B~ g~ X X 2 19.~ 25 6.~ 150.~ ....
24 ~ p~ X X 2 19.~ 33 6.~ 198.~
25 )!~ P~l X X 2 19.~ 31 6.~ 186.~
26 T~ P~ X X 2 19.~ 24 6.~ 1~.~
27 G~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 26 6.~ 156.~
28 ~ ~S~ X X 2 19.~ 27 6.~ 162.~
29 ~ ~VAE X X 2 19.~ 21 6.~ 126.~
~ ~ SIP~.Y. X X 2 19.~ ~ 6.~ 1~.~
31 R~ S~ X X 2 19.~ 23 6.~ 138.~
32 ~~ ~ X 2 19.~ 22 6.~ 132.~
,zo.
~ D V~~ ~X 2 19.~ 28 6.~ 1~.~
~ RY~ ~,~.Y~ X X 2 19.~ 27 6.~ 162.~
~ T~ ~a.Y~ X X 2 19.~ 18 6.~ 1~.~
37 D~S ~ X X 2 19.~ 28 6.~ 168.~
36 35 71
~ %~ 87~ ~3 177~ 674.~ 8~ ~ 5~323.50
177~ ~n18 674.50
1375'-: .......................... , .........................................
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
37 27 139 136
HOUND FIRE 10 7 31 19
I/1-11~ 12 13 54 49
MINNETONKA BEACH,FIRE. ~,~, ~; ,,, ~,: 0..,,~ 0 4 3
I/~ERGEREY O O 0 3
MINNETRI STA FIRE 2 1 6 12
D~RGENCY 2 1 9 16
ORONO ~,,n~ ~ n ~ 10
SHOREWOOD FIRE 0 ~ 1 0
~ o 0 1 1
SPa~NG PARK ~ 3 0 10 ~2
m-~ 3 3 15 4
~TUAL A~D ~ 1 0 ~ 0
~ 0 0 0 0
TOTAL FIRE CALLS 17 9 56 56
TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS ~ 18 83 ~
~CI~ O 0 4 0
~I~ 5 4 21 21
~~ 0 O 1, 1
~S & ~.~S 4 3 9 16
~ 2 1 4 5
F~E ~ / F~~ 6 I 17 13
~. OF ~ ~ ~7 167 901 4~
- MO~D ~ 181 261 1013 9~
~ 488 428 1914 14~
FI~ 0 0 56 ~
- HTKA BEACH ~ 0 0 0 47
~ 0 0 56 115
~I~ 46 54 217 373
- M' TRISTA ~~ 37 22 177 ~3
., , ~ 83 76 3~ 716
F~ 38 0 71 2~
- ORONO ~ 99 25 124 146
,,, ~ 137 25 195 3~
F~ 0 ~20 ~20 0
- SHO~EWOOD ~ 0 0 16 1~
~ 0 120 136 15
- SP. PARK ~ [ 4~ 54 ~9 ~2
, ~ 114 s4 478 ~
F~ 62 0 62 0
- ~ m ~ o o o o
~ 62 0 62 0
~OTA~ DlILb nOUIS 177~ 177~ 697~ ~2~
TO~AL FIRE HOURS 521 341 1616 129}
~OTAL EMERGENCY HOURS ~6} }62 1619 1627
~ FmB & ~ ~ ~ 703 ~2~ ~22
~TUAL AID RECEIVED 0 2 ~ 0
~TUAL AID GIVEN 1 0 ~ 0
......
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
DRILL
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of fires
Pre-plan and Inspections
Tools and Apparatus Identify
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First aid and Rescue Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
REPORT
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural/Propane.Gas demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliance
Hours Training Paid :
~ Excused
X Unexecused O Present / Not Paid
Miscellaneous :
PERSONNEL
2~J.Andersen
~-~-~-G.Anderson
~J.Babb
D.Boyd
D.Bryce
S.Bryce
D.Carlson
J.Casey
~:Collins
~ Englehart
~Z,~_, S.Erickson
_~_~P.Fisk
J. Ga r va i s
.Grady
.Grady
C. Henderson
P.Henry
B. Landsman
R .Marschke
.Nafus
~-J.Nelson
.Nelson
.Palm
~_~z~M. Palm
/3
T.Palm
G.Pederson
T.Rassmusen
M,Savage
.Sipprell
.Stal]man
~.Swenson
.Swenson
. Vanecek
~.Williams
.Williams
~/~D.Woytcke
DRILL
NOUND F RE DEPARTMENT
Pre-plan and Inspections
Tools and Apparatus Identify
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First aid and Rescue Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
Hours Training Paid :
(~ Excused
X Unexecused
REPORT
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural/Propane Gas demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliance
0 Present / Not Paid
laneous
PERSONNEL
2~//~J.Garvais
2~/~J.Andersen
, G.Anderson ~_~T.Palm
J.Babb ~Y~G.Pederson
[~D.Boyd ~T.Rassmusen
~ ~D.Bryce 2Y~
~ =S.Bryce
-_D.Carlson
0 ~ ~'Casey
.Collins
R.Englehart
S.Erickson
P.Fisk
~-_~D. Grady
~=_~K .Grady
~___~_C. Henderson
~._~_P · Henry
.~ ~/z-B. Landsman
.~ ~/~R · Ma rschke
.~~~/~ MJ'Nafus
J.Nelson
.Nelson
B.Niccum
~- ~/~G.Palm
.~/~M. Pa ] m
M.Savage
Z--q~-~K.Sipprell
~R.Stallman
~.~____~.Swenson
_~,~W.Swenson
E.Vanecek
R.Williams
~ z.T.Williams
-2~D.Woytcke
NOUND FIRE DEPAR~4ENT
~ MAII~I~/AI~ FOR HOKIH OF
~ J. ANDERSEN
G. ANDERSON
J. BABB
D. BOYD
D. ~C~
~ D. CARLSON
,2. J. CAS~
~ S. COLLINS
,2, Ro~T
~ S. ERI~
(~) , P. FISK
,2 j. C,~vA~s
~,f~, D. (reADY
<O ~. ~,~DY
~ P. HENRY
,, ,~,~ ,.J. NAFUS
¢>~ ,J° NELSON
~ B. NICCUM
~ M. SAV~E
~ K. SIP~.L
MOUND FIRE DEPARIMENT
TOTAL MAINT]~&NCE FOR MON~ OF
J. ANDERS~
G. ANDERSON
J. BABB
D. BOYD
~_ S. BRYCE
-~ I)o~N
,~ S. COLLINS
· ~ R. ~T
-~ S. ERICKSON
(~) P. FISK
.~ J. GA~VA~S
P. HENRY
MEN ON DUTY
~,~ J. NAFUS
_ c~ J. NELSON
!
/~_ M. Nn~ON
~.~ R. STAT.T~N
.2 ~. SWENSON
/ Wo SWENSON
.2. E. VANECn(
// R. WILLIAMS
~ T. WILLIAMS
~ D. ~DYTCKE
~ ~ON~HLY HOURS_/1_~
CITY of MOUND
P~RKS DEPARTMENT
APRIL 1992 MONTHLY REPORT
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(6121 472-1155
FAX ~612~ 472-0620
P~S
This time of the year we begin putting out all of the summer equipment, the picnic
tables and garbage cans have been distributed; the tennis nets and volleyball nets have
been installed.
Soon the grass will begin growing and the mowing will be of high priority, so we try
to get the seasonal repairs and installation done before the weather turns too nice.
This year we will be pressed to perform some tasks early. As you are aware, Bob
Johnson will not be returning. Generally, he would have begun working in mid-April
along with Kent Kirsh. Kent will not be able to work until May llth. At which time
the cemetery must be ready for Memorial Day and Mound Bay Park's beach must have all
of the beach equipment installed.
To add to this, one of my mowing crew members that would have been on hand the week
before Memorial Day will be in Germany visiting relatives until May 25th. I do not
expect the full crew back until May 26th, so please bear with us through the
circumstances of man-power availability.
Commons
To say April in the docks program was busy would be an understatement. Tom has been
issuing the 1992 dock sites, and with the high water there has been a tremendous amount
of interest. Realtors have been calling for information due to the mortgage rates
being good.
Of course the inventory of the shoreline began, but was interrupted by the Carole
Munson situation in which staff spent many hours preparing background for the Council's
review. To-date we have completed the inventory of the island and half of three points.
I would have been more comfortable being done with Three Points at this time, but with
the effort and time put into the Munson situation, it is understandable. I still feel
we will have a completed inventory in June.
Cemeter~
The repair work to the graves from the winter of 1991-92 has been done so things are
looking good for Memorial weekend.
Tree Removal
Two city trees were marked for removal in April, but will not be taken until mid-May.
This is due to first road restrictions and during early part of April and then the
ground being too wet to run heavy equipment on it.
JF:pj
J ~ S I ~ printed on recycled paper
CITY of MOUND
MEMORANDUM
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612, 472-1155
FAX (6!2) 472-0620
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
May 7, 1992
City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff
Jon Sutherland, Building Official ~'
APRIL 1992 MONTHLY REPORT
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
In April 26 building permits were issued for a valuation of
$352,184, this brings year-to-date valuation to $1,177,303, a 149
percent increase over last year-to-date.
There were 30 plumbing, mechanical and miscellaneous permits issued
for a total of 56 permits this month and 169 year-to-date.
PLANNING & ZONING
The Planning Commission reviewed proposed floodplain and shoreland
ordinances drafted by the City Planner, Mark Koegler. The Planning
Commission subcommittee is continuing its fast track review of the
proposed Truth in Housing Ordinance. There were the usual numerous
variance requests.
CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LANDS
Parks Director Jim Fackler, Dock Inspector Tom McCaffrey, and I are
continuing the inventory of public shoreline as directed by the
City Council.
TRAINING AND MEETINGS
I attended the regular monthly Building Official's meeting.
JS:pj
printed on recycled paper
CITY OF NOUND
5.%41 Naywood Road
Hound~ NN 55364
BIJILDINO ACTIVITY REPORT
Mo~d, APRIL .~v 1992
220 788
753,629
' TOTA~
I.
:l I'
I 26 I ' 76 I I
6
6
8 (S /STREET
3 ' 3
XCAVAT]~N/ABANI
{
O~ TAm~S)
CITY of MOUND
534! MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND M!NNESOTA55364-1687
i612) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472-0620
May 7, 1992
TO:
CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY CLERK
RE:
APRIL MONTHLY REPORT
The Council had 2 regular meetings with minutes, 12 resolutions and
1 ordinance along with the follow-up items from these meetings.
The bids were opened on the 1992 Sealcoating Project and awarded to
Allied Blacktop.
April 7th was the Presidential Primary Election. This took up the
better part of the first 10 days of April. We are required to
remain open on the Saturday before the an election from 1:00 P.M.
to 3:00 P.M. which had one person casting a vote. We are also
required to be open until 7:30 P.M. on Monday evening before
election day for absentee voting. No one came in that night. The
judges sure enjoyed being in one polling place for a primary
election and surprisingly I only had one person gripe about not
knowing there would only be one polling location. The funny thing
about that is that her husband was the first one in line at 7:00
A.M. Linda and I kept track of all our time as well as all the
costs. This came to a staggering $7.08 per vote for this election.
Out of 5935 registered voters, 573 voted. We will be reimbursed
something for this election but it won't come close to the actual
costs because the State is only allowing certain expenses. I have
attached a summary of the election for your information.
Ail renewal forms for the following licenses were sent:
On-Sale Beer
Set-Ups
On-Sale Wine
Off-Sale Beer
Club On-Sale
Ail Licenses were prepared and sent for the following:
Restaurant
Juke Box
printed on recycled paper
Bowling
Pool
Games of Skill
Prepared ordinance amendments for Chapter 800 in the City Code.
There were the usual calls and questions from residents.
fc
DFL BALLOT PCT.1 PCT. 2 PCT.3 PCT.4 PCT.5 PCT.6 TOTAL
EDHUND G. Bgok~ JR. 20 1~ 30 12 2~ 22 122
STEPHEN BURKE__ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BILL CLINTON 8 8 22 16 14 22 90
TOM HARKIN 0 1 3 1 1 0 6
BOB KERREY 0 1 0 0 I 0 2
LYNDON H. LAROUCHE, JR. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J. LOUIS MC ALPINE _____0_ __0___ 0 0 0 0 0
EUGENE J. MC CARTHY _ 1 __ 0 0 ___0___ 0 ...... .0 ...... 1
JEFFREY F. MARSH 0 0 0 0 0 0
I~R.YI JANE RACHNER . . . 0 . O. 1 0 0 0
PAUL E. TSONGAS 12 5 10 10 7 10 54
CHARLES WOODS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LARRY AGRAN : ___ 0 2 1 0 0 ..... O ...... 3__
NATHAN J. AVERICK : ' 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
UNCOMMITTED DELEGATES 1 1 2 5 4 2 15
WRITE INS: 3 0 10 4 6 8 31
H. ROSS PEROT ; 1 0 3 4 3 _.6. .... 1__7_
' WALTER MONDALE _ ,_2., 2 4
JERRY BROWN 4 ........ 1 ..........
BO GRIETZ i 2 ......... 2___ _
LLOYD BENSON 1
IR BALLOT
HAROLD E. ST_A_S_SEN ....0_9_ ..... 0 ...., ...... 4_.__ 2 ....1 ..... __1 .... 8
GEORGE _A .__Z_!MME ~ _RMe%N' .....................
....... o o~_ o o o o ..... 0___
SfI~ON ANDERSON 0 0___ 0 0 __0 .... __0_ ...... 0 ....
PATRICK ~d ~B_UCHAN~ .__AN
..... G~Eg_R_GE__BUSH 18 __ _7 ..... _5)._ ...... 2_5__ .... _33 ....... 2_2 .156
BEATRICE J. MOONEY .................................
...................... o o o 1 o o 1..
UNCOMMITTED DELEGATES 1 0 1 0. 1 1 4
WRITE-INS: ................................
...... H. _.RO~ S__PEROT_ ............................ --6 ........ 6 _2 14
_ _ OVERVOTES ...................... 1 .............. 1
BLANK BALLOTS 1
TOTAL 25 15 89 36 49 33 247
TOTAL BALLOTS CAST
__BOTH PARTIES .___70_ .... 4_9 168 ..... 84___ !.0_5 ....... ~_7__. 573 ....
CITY of MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA 5536-:-:657
(612/4'72-1155
FAX (612¢
May 6, 1992
TO; Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM;
Joyce Nelson
Recycling Coordinator
SUBJECT; April's Recycling
As you all know the big news for April was our Leaf Pickup,
Special Recycling Days and Operation Clean Sweep.
LEAF PICKUP
This was held April 24 & 25, Westonka Sanitation picked up
380 cubic yards or 126 tons of leaves.
SPECIAL RECYCLING
This was also held April 24 & 25, these were 2 very busy
days. We didn't have enough help to keep track of the number
of cars that came though, but I'd estimate it at 1500.
Friday, the 24th was a busy day, with 3 people collecting
money, Saturday the 25th was very busy with at times 5 people
collecting money. We took in $4,286.92. Now for the totals
of recyclables collected.
Tires - 24.6 tons
Appliances - 30.11 tons - 305 appliances
12 air conditioners
Goodwill - 18.1 tons
Our total so far is 72.81 tons, with the scrap metal still
being cleaned up.
Our residents of Mound thought this was the best thing
Mound's ever done and want to know when the next one will be.
Knutson Services (the City's Recycling Company) came in the
next Monday and stated there was alot more recycling out than
US
Ua
1
~ printed on recycled paper
OPERATION ..C._L_.E..A_N SWEEP
It worked very well having our Special Recycling along with
the Clean Sweep. They filled a 13 yd. dumpster and recycled
many bags of cans and glass. Tires were brought right to the
site of the Special Recycling.
April's tonnage was 64.98 tons
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Len Harrell
Monthly Report for April, 1992
STATISTICS
The police department responded to 709 calls for
service during the month of April. There were 36 Part
I offenses reported. Those offenses included 3
criminal sexual conduct, 13 burglaries, 18 larcenies,
and 2 arsons.
There were 68 Part II offenses reported. Those
offenses included 3 child abuse/neglect, 4 forgery/NSF
checks, 1 narcotics, 10 damage to property, 1 liquor
law violations, 6 DUI's, 11 simple assaults, 8
domestics (6 with assaults), 12 harassments, 6 juvenile
status offenses, and 6 other offenses.
The patrol division issued 128 adult citations and 11
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 29 tickets. Warnings were issued to 76
individuals for a variety of violations.
There were 5 adults and 1 juvenile arrested for
felonies. There were 25 adults and 4 juveniles
arrested for misdemeanors. There were an additional 31
warrant arrests.
The department assisted in 7 vehicular accidents, 1
with injuries. There were 27 medical emergencies and
63 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on
6 occasions in April and requested assistance 11 times.
Property valued at $22,372 was stolen.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - APRIL, 1992
II.
III.
IV.
Ve
INVESTIGATION
The investigators worked on 3 criminal sexual conduct
cases and 7 child protection issues in April. Those 10
cases accounted for over 76 hours of investigative
time. Additional cases investigated included assault,
theft, burglary, forgery and NSF checks, stolen
vehicle, damage to property, harassing communications,
kidnaping, and absenting.
Formal complaints were issued against individuals for
assault, criminal sexual conduct and use of a minor in
a sexual performance, forgery, false imprisonment, and
vehicle theft.
Personnel/Staffinq
The department used approximately 70 hours of overtime
during the month of April. Officers used 41.5 hours of
comp-time, 37.5 hours of vacation, 112 hours of sick
time, and 3 holidays. Officers earned 67 hours of
comp-time.
Training
Officers attended 17 days of training during the month
of April. The training consisted of courses in verbal
judo, critical incidents, sexual harassment, animal
control, EMT refresher, and firearms instructor. Three
officers continue to attend the Wilson Course.
Police Reserves
Report not available
OFFENSES
REPORTED
CLEARED
UNFOUNDED
/~PRIL, 1992
EXCEPT.
CLEARED
CLEARED BY
ARREST
ARRESTED
ADULT JUVENILE
PART I CRIME~
Homicide 0 0 0 0
Criminal Sexual Conduct 3 1 0 0
Robbery 0 0 0 0
Aggravated AssauLt 0 0 0 0
BurgLary 13 0 0 0
Larceny 18 2 0 4
VehicLe Theft 0 0 0 0
Arson 2 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 I
0 0
0 0
TOTAL 36 3 0 4 5
PART I! CRINE~
ChiLd Abuse/NegLect 3 0 1 0 0
Forgery/NSF Checks 4 1 0 1 2
Criminal Damage to Property 10 0 1 0 0
Weapons 0 0 0 0 0
Narcotics 1 0 0 1 1
Liquor Laws 1 0 0 1 1
DWI 6 0 0 6 6
SimpLe AssauLt 11 0 5 4 7
Domestic AssauLt 6 0 0 4 4
Domestic (No AssauLt) 2 0 0 0 0
Harassment 12 0 2 I 0
JuveniLe Status Offenses 6 0 I 3 0
PubLic Peace 2 0 0 2 2
Trespassing 0 0 0 0 0
A[[ Other Offenses 4 0 I 0 2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
TOTAL 68 1 11 23 25
PART III & PART IV
Property Damage Accidents 6
Persenat Injury Accidents 1
Fatal Accidents 0
Nedicats 27
Aniam[ CompLaints 63
Mutua[ Aid 6
Other Genera[ Investigations 499
TOTAL 602
Hennepin County ChiLd Protection 3
TOTAL 709
11
27
3O
1
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
MV?ATV
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
APRIL, 1992
ADULT
6
3
1
9
2
70
0
0
3
0
5
0
4
0
1
1
0
29
1
4
0
13
1
157
JUV
0
0
0
0
1
9
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
11
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
APRILv 1992
WARNINGS
NO Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
WARRANT ARRESTS
Felony Warrant
Misdemeanor Warrants
ADULT
19
12
18
0
5
6
0
0
3
8
71
2
28
JUV
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$
0
1
RUN:
PRO0~
PROP
TYPE
1-RAY-92
PROP
DESC
INSTALLATION NAHE -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTNENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
03/26/92 THRU 04/25/92
INCIDENT SEQ TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
NUHBER NO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE
BIKE
BIKE
CLOTH
CONSUH
APPLNC
JEWELRY
JEWELRY
JEWELRY
JEWELRY
JEWELRY
JEWELRY
JEWELRY
JEWELRY
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CIJRNCY
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
HV PRTS
NV PRTS
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
BICYCL
BICYCL
92000505
92000545
92000530
92000542
92000654
92000537
92000526
92000486
92000487
92000558
92000559
92000559
92000559
92000559
92000559
92000493
92000559
92000582
92000586
92000602
92000434,
92000676
92000486
92000487
920005~6
92000581
92000586
92000512
92000517
92000518
92000604
92000605
92O006O7
92000608
92000616
92000618
92000619
92000487
92000555
03/30/92
04/05/92
04/03/92
O4/05/92
O4/22/92
04/04/92
04/02/92
03/26/92
O3/26/92
04/07/92
04/07/92
04/07/92
04/07/92
04/07/92
04/O7/92
03/27/92
04/07/92
04/11/92
04/13/92
04/17/92
04/25/92
03/26/92
03/26/92
04/03/92
04/11/92
04113192
03/31/92
03/31/92
03/31/92
04/16/92
04/16/92
04/16/92
04/16/92
04/17/92
04/17/92
04/17/92
03/26/92
04/07/92
$200
$100
$50 04/23/92
$175
$1,050
$14
$75
$325
$125
$299
$7,000
S5,000
$395
S500
$2,000
S100
$295
$120
$325
$480 04/17/92
$0 04/07/92
$62O
$300
S685
$304
SSO0
S170
$25
$75
$75
$75
$140
$75
$75
$100
S35 04124192
$30 O4/07/92
$5O
$480
$1,200
$35
$30
TOTALS: $22,372
131</
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
APRIL, 1992
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUHMARY
THIS
MONTH
YEAR TO
DATE
Hazardous Citations 70
Non-Hazardous Citations 18
Hazardous Warnings 10
Non-Hazardous Warnings 50
Verbal Warnings 142
Parking Citations 29
DWI 6
Over .10 3
Property Damage Accidents 6
Personal Injury Accidents 1
Fatal Accidents 0
Adult Felony Arrests 7
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 53
Adult Misdemeanor Citations 7
Juvenile Felony Arrests 1
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 5
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 2
Part I Offenses 36
Part II Offenses 68
Medicals 27
Animmal Complaints 63
Other Public Contacts 499
232
85
41
180
475
351
17
9
28
5
0
27
133
26
5
2O
7
89
241
99
307
1,790
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
307
90
8
86
502
239
34
20
32
12
0
13
112
26
9
29
7
82
199
88
241
1,731
TOTAL 1,103
Assists 71
Follow-Ups 12
Henn. County Child Protection 3
Mutual Aid Given 6
Mutual Aid Requested 11
4,167
261
71
19
37
2O
3,867
171
32
20
45
16
RUN:
CFS03
1 -~AY-92
ISN'S ONLY? NO
CODES: ALL
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09000 SPEEDING
09001 J-SPEEDING
09006 TEST REFUSAL
09010 BAC OVER .10
09012 OPEN BOTTLE
09013 J-OPEN BOTTLE
0901/* STOP SIGN
09015 J-STOP SIGN
09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
CARELESS/RECKLESS
09024 ILLEGAL/UNSAFE TURNS
09029 J-DRIVING ON PARK PROP.
09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION
0~038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC
090~0 NO SEATBELT
0~100 PARKING/ALL OTHER
0~140 NO PARKING/141NTER HOURS
09200 DAS/DAR/DAC
09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
097.20 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
09301 LOST PERSONS
09312 FOUND ANIMALS/ZNPOUNDS
09313 FOUNO PROPERTY
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
03/26/92 THRU 0/,/25/92
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 ?0 80 90
9 16 6 18 21
2
1 1 1
1 1
1
1 2 2
1
1 2 1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 6 4
1 1 Z 13
1 1 5 1 1
~ 1
1
1
1 Z 1
1 1 3
PAGE
TOTAL
70
9
2
3
1
5
1
4
1
1
1
1
2
13
12
17
9
3
1
1
RUN: 1-MAY-92
CFS03
PRIMARY ]SN~S ONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09314 FOUND VEHiCLES/iMPOUNDED
09315 UNCLAIME DESTROYED ANIMALS
09430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS
09450 PROPERTY DANAGE ACCIDENTS
09451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC.
09560 MEDICAL/AB
09561 OOG BiTE
09563 OOG AT LARGE
09~66 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS
09710 MEDICAL/ASU
09720 MEDICAL/OOA
09730 NED]CALS
09731 MEDICALS/DX
09735 I00 INJURY
09800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIEO
09801 OCMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST
09810 LOITERINO/LURKiNG
09900 ALL HCCP CASES
09930 HANOGUN APPLICATION
09950 INFO/INT
09980 WARRANTS
09990 NiSC. VIOLATIONS
INSTALLATION NAME -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
03/26/92 THRU 04/25/92
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
1
3 2 7
I 1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 2
3 2 4
1
1 1
1 2
2
I 1
1
21
PAGE
TOTAL
1
3
1.
5
1
1
2
1
20
3
1
5
2
1
1
3
1
31
2
RUN:
CFS03
1-HAY-92
ISN~S ONLY? NO
CODES: ALL
INSTALLATION NAME "MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
03/26/92 THRU 04/25/92
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
09992 MUTUAL AID/8100
09993 MUTUAL AID/6500
A5314 ASLT 5-1NFLT BODILY HARM-POSS FRRM-CHLD-FAM
A5351 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAN
A5352 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-AOLT-ACQ
A5353 ASLT 5-iNFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-STR
A5355 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
Bl13~ BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-D-UNK I~EAP-CON THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK IdEAP-CON THEFT
B~394 BURG ~-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT
83434 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK ~EAP-CC~ THEFT
B3494 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-CON THEFT
B379& BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP*CON THEFT
B3894 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC'U-UNK ~EAP-CON THEFT
B4760 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
Cl111 FORGERY-FE-MAKE ALTER OESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
C3211 FORGERY-MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE"CHECK-PERSON
F4005 ARSON 3-MS-UNK CONO-OT PROP-S299 LESS
i]060 CRZM AGNST FAN'MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILO
J2500 TRAFFiC-GM-DRiVE UNOER iNFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J3500 TRAF-ACCIO-MS-ORIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
L1021 CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-F
4 1
2 1
PAGE
TOTAL
RUN: 1-HAY-9Z
CFS03
PRIHARY ]SN~S ONLY?
ACTIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAHE -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTNENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSZS BY PATROL AREA
03/26/92 THRU 0~/25/92
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 · 60 70 80 90
L1025 CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-16-1?-F
H2313 OBSTRUCT CORRESPONDENCE (POSTAL)
!,~003 JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT
H4199 LIQUOR - OTHER
H§350 RUNAWAY
H6501 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
N3060 DISTURB PEACE-NS-CONCEALING IDENTITY
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-NS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
Pl110 PROP DAI4AGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P3110 PROP D/U4AGE-NS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P3120 PROP DANAGE-NS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
P3130 PROP DANAGE-NS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
Q2293 STLN PROP-GN-POSSESS-OTHER PROP-$301-$999
T2021 THEFT-$251-$2SOO-FE-FRN BUILDING-HONEY
T2029 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP
T&029 THEFT-$250 LESS-NS-FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP
T4159
U3018
U3028
U3498
THEFT'$250 LESS-NS-FRN HOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-NS-BY CHECK ' $200 OR LESS
THEFT-NS-ISSUE UORTHLES CHECK - $200 OR LESS
THEFT'NS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-S200 OR LESS
2
& 3 3
1
1 3 I 1
1
1 1
1
1
I 2 3 2
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
5
1
2
12
1
7
1
1
1
2
1
1
11
1
1
2
REPORT TOTALS: 47 54 81 83 98 2 3 3 1
372
RUN: SO-APR-92 INSTALLATION NAME -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1
OFF01
ISN*S ONLY? NO E # F 0 R S
ITION COOES: ALL
ACTIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 03/26/92 THRU 04/25/92
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
A5314 1
ASLT 5-INFLT BOOILY HARM-POSS FRRM-CHLD-FAM
A5351 4
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
A5352 3
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACO
A5353 3
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRMoHANDS-ADLT-STR
A5355 4
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACO
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0
0 3 1 2 0 0 2 66.6
0 3 1 2 0 0 2 66.6
0 4 0 0 0 4 4 100.0
A5502 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
THRT BOOILY HARMoUNK UEAP-ADLT-ACO
I 0 I I 0 0 0 0 .0
BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-D-UNK I~EAP-COH THEFT
B3334 3
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK I~EAP-~ THEFT
B3394 2
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK UEAP-CCM THEFT
B3434 2
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK UEAP-COH THEFT
B3494 E
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK I,/EAP-COH THEFT
83?94 1
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK I, IEAP-COH THEFT
B3894 1
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK ~,IEAP-COM THEFT
64760 1
BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK I~EAP-UNK ACT
C1111 1
FORGERY-FE-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
1 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
1 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 I 0 0 1 100.0
RUN: ~0-APR-92
OFF01
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE 2
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 03/26/92 THRU 04/25/92
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
OESCRIPTION REPORTEO UNFOUNDEO OFFENSES PENOING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEAREO
C3211 1
FORGERY-MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
F4005
ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT PROP-S299 LESS
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
13060
CRIM AGNST FAH-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
J2500 1
TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J3500 5
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 5 0 5 0 0 5 100.0
L1021 2 1 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-F
L1025 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-16-1?-F
M2313 1 0 1 0 0 0
OBSTRUCT CORRESPONDENCE (POSTAL)
1 1 100.0
!~3003 1 0 I 0 0 1 0 I 100.0
JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT
M4199 I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
LIQUOR - OTHER
M5350 5 0 5 2 0 2 I 3 60.0
RUNAWAY
146501 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
N3060
DISTURB PEACE-NS-CONCEALING IDENTITY
2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0
N3190 12
DISTURB PEACE-NS-NARRASSING CONNUNICATIONS
0 12 9 0 1 2 3 25.0
Pl110 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
PROP DAHAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
Iq, ol
RUN: 30-APR-92
OFFO1
INSTALLATION NAHE -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
ISNVS ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
COOES: ALL
ACTIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 03/26/92 THRU 04/25/92
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
P3110 6 0 6 5 0 0 1 1 16.6
PROP DAHAGE-MS-PR[VATE-UNK %NTENT
P3120 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
PROP DAHAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
P3130 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
PROP DAHAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK iNTENT
Q2293 1
STLN PROP-GM-POSSESS-OTHER PROP-S301-$999
T2021 2
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRN BUILDING-HONEY
T2029 1
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
1
THEFT-$2SO LESS-NS-FRN BU[LDING-OTH PROP
T4159 11
THEFT-S250 LESS-NS-FRN MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 2 0 1 1 0 2 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 11 11 0 0 0 0 .0
U3018 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT-NS-BY CHECK - $200 OR LESS
U3028 1
THEFT-NS-ISSUE gORTNLES CHECK - $200 OR LESS
U3498 2
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-S200 OR LESS
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
REPORT TOTALS - 96 4 92 54 22 5 11 38 41.3
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-I 687
(612) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472-0620
May 5, 1992
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS AND CITY MANAGER
JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE M~NAGER
APRIL 1992 MONTHLY REPORT
I don't want to talk about sales. The month was too wet, too
cold, and too overcast. It was simply downright dreary and
miserable. Customers were very owly and surly. Severe depression
accurately describes the mood that people were in last month.
Enough! On to a brighter topic.
The registers are in. Arrived Monday morning, April 13th. Oh
what joy! What rapture! I think I am in Love. No more inventory
tickets! No more unsightly blight! I actually entertained the
idea of amassing all the old inventory tickets, piling them in the
parking lot, and tossing a match to them, and then, maybe, holding
some kind of ceremony over the pyre. After the initial excitement
abated and cooler thoughts prevailed, I realized such action could
result in community eyebrow raising. The fire department would
surely frown. Wouldn't I need a burning permit? The religious
sects would undoubtedly "pooh-pooh: this seemingly satanic act. I
mean how would it look with Julie, our staff and myself presiding
over a burning pile invoking chants and incantations? And finally,
there are the environmentalists feelings to consider. I asked
myself, "Joe, you can't pollute the atmosphere no matter how fun
and fulfilling this symbolic act would be to me."
Progress.
JK:ls
laos
printed on recycled paper
CITY of MOUND
534" MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55354-",68-
6~2 472-~ 155
FAX (612, 472-062,0
May 6, 1992
TO; Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM:
Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
SUBJECT; April's Activity Report
Guess what we did this month, sweep - sweep - sweep. We
spent about 90% of our time cleaning streets, sidewalks and
parking lots. We started the 26th of March and finished the
30th of April. We made good time considering the amount of
debris that was on the streets. We put down 1500 tons more
salt sand this season then we every have and also we didn't
get the leaves picked up last Fall. The number of truck
loads in the past years ranged from 250 to 265, 4 yard loads,
this year 309 loads, as you can see a substantial increase in
the amount of material picked up.
As far as equipment break downs (NONE), I guess that shows
that the 4 or 5 days we spend on repairs and maintenance,
done before the sweeping season pays off.
We've been spending some time lining up contractors to start
repairing retaining walls, curb and gutters, watermain
patches and some landscaping repairs. Dunsmore Asphalt Co.
started work on the main break patches the 27th.
SIGN WORK
2 Slow Children, 2 Street signs and 1 Stop.
road posting signs down the 8th.
We took our
._C_E_M_ E_T~ _R3. ~ORK
Laid out 3 stones and swept the driveway.
printed on recycled paper
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 5536-:-1687
(612) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472-062C
May 5, 1992
TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
FROM: JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR~4~
RE~ APRIL FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
INVESTMENTS
The following is April investment activity:
Balance: April 1, 1992
$5,563,448
Bought:
Farm Ct. 6.38 Marquette Due 4-3-95 375,000
CP 4.00 Dain Due 7-16-92 98,844
CP 4.00 Shearson Due 7-31-92 159,14~
Matured:
Farm Ct. 6.60 Marquette (300,000)
CP 3.83 Dain (198,670)
CP 4.10 Marquette (179,210)
Balance April 30, 1992
$5,518,555
AUDIT
The auditors have completed their examination of the City's
records. I prepare the worksheets, statements and notes to the
financial statements. The audit report will be submitted to GFOA
for evaluation in the Certificate of Achievement program. The
previous three reports have received this award. The audit report
is scheduled to be presented to the City Council on May 12, 1992.
WORKERS COMPENSATION RATES
A bill was passed during the past legislative session regarding a
16% w/c premium rate reduction. I contacted Peter Tritz of the
League of Minnesota cities Trust (LMCIT), our w/c provider, to see
what effect this legislation would have on our w/c rates. Peter
stated that the 16% reduction in premiums was for w/c insurance
companies and did not apply to LMCIT since we are self-insured and
printed on recycled paper
April Finance Department Report
Page 2
are rated on our own group. However, the benefit changes within
the legislation will have a beneficial effect to LMCIT on w/c rates
in the future. Peter stated that the positive changes will be
incorporated into the w/c rate structure next year. He also stated
they will meet to discuss whether a mid-year rate adjustment is
possible. However, there will not be an automatic 16% reduction
across the board in w/c rates.
JN:ls
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472-0620
May 6, 1992
TO; Ed Shukle
City of Mound
FROM;
Greg Skinner
Water & Sewer Supt.
SUBJECT; April's Activity Report
In April we pumped 19,637,000 gallons of water. Meter repair
was the big item this month. We have repaired outside readers
for use this summer, we will not be purchasing any more of
the Pro reads or Touchreads for exchanges. We will use the
old outside reads and registers that we repaired. New
construction will receive Pro Reads or Touchreads.
Some repairs have been made to our streets that were dug up
for main breaks this winter. We will start hydrant flushing
and maintenance on May 17.
SEWER DEPT.
The Sewer Dept. has begun sewer line cleaning, this will be
done 3 days a week until the end of Sept.
We have completed the lift station work on M-1. This lift
station was abandoned with the flow diverted to MWCC lift
station on Tuxedo Blvd. The cost of this was $13,800. This
means that we have one less lift station to upgrade in the
future with a savings of about $31,000.
printed on recycled paper
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 27v 1992
Those present were: Bill Meyer, Geoff Michael, Jerry Clapsaddle,
Frank Weiland, Michael Mueller, Bill Voss, Mark Hanus, and Brian
Johnson, City Council Representative Liz Jensen, City Manager Ed
Shukle, City Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jon
Sutherland, and Secretary Peggy James. No other citizens were
present.
MINUTES
The April 13, 1992 Planning Commission Minutes were presented for
changes and/or additions.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Clapsaddle, to
approve the April 13, 1992 Planning Commission Minutes as
written. Motion carried unanimously.
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE REVIEW
City Planner, Mark Koegler, presented a draft of a new floodplain
ordinance which will replace the current City Code Section 330:15
for comments and suggestions from the Commission. After this
review, a copy will be forwarded to the DNR for preliminary
comments.
Koegler commented that the ordinance does not make any exceptions
for boat houses or any other accessory structures. If desired by
the Planning Commission, a separate standard for boat houses can be
added to text.
Mueller commented that he is in favor of having an exception for
water oriented structures, allowing them a lowest floor elevation
of one foot lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation,
however, require that mechanical and electrical devices be placed
at the regulatory flood protection elevation which is 2 feet above
the Regulatory Flood. It was determined that the issue of boat
houses would be discussed later with review of the Shoreland
Ordinance.
Mueller referred to 300:15, Subd. 2. c. "Interpretation," and
suggested that the responsibility be taken away from the Building
Official and make the applicant responsible to supply the materials
necessary in order the clarify the actual elevation of the land.
Hanus referred to the definition for "Basement" and questioned the
intent of this definition and how staff interprets "base subgrade."
Sutherland commented that the subgrade is the lowest floor below
the grade at the exterior of the building. It was agreed to change
Planning Commission Minutes April 27, 1992
the definition to read: "... base subgrade below ground level ~
~ as defined by the Building Code." Mueller would like the
definition to read "current" building code.
Subd. 4. f. "Minimum Basement/Floor Elevations." It was suggested
that the different elevations be listed in this section for the
different lakes in Mound.
Subd. 4. g. "Vehicular Access." Hanus noted that the second line
could be changed to make it clearer, such as" . plain, in
which the access area would be . . ." Koegler wi~l'review.
Subd. 4. h. "Uses Accessory to Commercial and Manufacturing Uses."
Koegler will try to re-write this section to make it sound less
scientific.
Hanus referred to Subd. 7. Variances, a. Procedures, which states,
in part: "No variance shall allow a use prohibited in a district
or permit a lower degree of protection than the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation. Variances may be used to modify permissible
methods of flood protection." Do these two sentences contradict
each other? Koegler commented that additional language is needed
on flood protection methods. Currently the proposed ordinance does
not tell us what the permissible methods for flood protection are,
so what would the variance be issued to?
Koegler added, if the Planning Commission determines to recommend
that boat houses be permitted in the City, and permit them to be 1
foot below the flood elevation, then this section would have to be
modified.
Koegler referred to the second sentence in "a." and commented that
this refers to the "use." He will look into clarifying the third
sentence relating to flood protection.
Subd. 7, c. The Planning Commission determined that the specific
rates noted should be deleted.
Mueller referred to Subd. 9, c., in the 9th line, it states "within
a specified time period . . ." Mueller suggested it read, "a
reasonable time period" It was determined that "within a specified
period of time not to exceed 30 days" may be better. It was noted
that the City Attorney will review the proposed ordinance and will
determine if this can be changed.
Hanus referred to Subd. 9, d., Lack of Response, and suggested that
the following be added "If the responsible party does not
appropriately respond to the Building Official within the specified
Planning Commission Minutes April 27, 1992
period of time after being properly notified, . . ." The Building
Official, in turn, suggested that in "c." above, the first sentence
could be modified to read, "The building Official shall follow due
Droce~s of law in notifying the suspected party . . ." Hanus wants
to ensure that the party involved gets notified and does not get
lost in the shuffle.
Hanus referred to the last sentence in Subd. 9, d. and suggested a
change, as follows: "The Building Official shall, upon the lapse of
the specified response period, notify the landowner to restore the
land to the condition which existed prior to the "~'A ~ ~'~- ~ ~'-
~ construction, development or use that has cause for
notification.
Koegler commented, that regardless of when a violation occurred it
could be a problem that needs to be rectified, all violations to-
date should be corrected. If there is a grandfathered situation
which existed prior to this ordinance, it is not a violation. The
Commission does not want the land to be restored to a prior
condition if that prior condition was a poor condition.
Mueller suggested that the following be added to Subd. 9, d." . .
· shall be prosecuted accordingly, and take the appropriate action
to accomplish the same."
Johnson referred to Subd. 9., a. Enforcement. It was determined to
amend this section by deleting the word "suspected" in the first
line.
SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE DISCUSSION
Guest Cottages: The Planning Commission agreed that no new guest
cottages should be allowed.
Controlled Accesses: It was suggested that this title be changed
to "Private Controlled Accesses," to avoid any conflict with
Mound's commons. The Planning Commission was in favor of
Controlled Accesses for private parties.
Placement of Structures:
Mueller referred to 5.21 which states, ". . . Where structures
exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building
site, structure setbacks may be altered without a variance to
conform to the adjoining setbacks from the ordinary high water
level, provided the proposed building site is not located in a
shore impact zone or in a bluff impact zone." Koegler confirmed
that the "shore impact zone" in Mound is 25' from the shoreline
which is half the required setback of 50'.
3
Planning Commission Minutes April 27, 1992
The Commission was concerned about new construction lining up with
existing houses which are closer than 50 feet to the shoreline, and
as a result houses will eventually creep towards the minimum of 25
feet from the shoreline.
Desiqn Criteria for Structures:
Structures.
Be
Water-oriented Accessory
Koegler commented that this is the section which the Planning
Commission needs to decide if boat houses or other water-orientated
structures should be allowed. Orono has proposed to only allow one
lock-box type structure not to exceed 20 square feet or 4 feet in
height.
Mueller questioned how this will correlate with the proposed zoning
code modifications which does not allow any structure within 50
feet of the lake. Mueller is not in favor of any new boat houses,
however, would like to deal more leniently with the existing ones.
Koegler commented that if the Commission decides to allow one
structure, the zoning code can be modified to correspond.
Koegler remarked to the Commissioner that he is not sure the DNR
has a unified opinion, but generally they would like to see a
natural and pristine shoreline.
Chair, Bill Meyer, polled the Commissioner's on their opinion
relating to water oriented structures in Mound. Koegler related
the DNR's definition for water orientated structures: "Structures
for viewing or using the lake, including boat houses, gazebos,
screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks."
Clapsaddle: Likes boat houses and gazebos if they are
constructed in a manner that correlates with the house.
He does not want to see little storage shacks. He likes
architectural elements which adds to the value and human
use of the property.
Hanus: In favor of allowing boat houses. Mound is an
urban area, and if there are going to be boat houses and
decks across the lake in another city, Mound should be
afforded the same use.
Johnson: The home owner has the right to have a deck,
gazebo, or boat house. However, he is concerned about
the maintenance of the structures. Fish houses should
not be allowed.
Weiland: Not in favor of any structures on the
shoreline.
Planning Commission Minutes April 27, 1992
Meyer: Not in favor of structures on the shoreline
because they are not and cannot be maintained. If the
structure blends into the land and looks nice, he may be
in favor.
Voss: Not in favor of any structures on the shoreline,
he is in favor of a natural shoreline and agrees with the
DNR's opinion.
Mueller: Not in favor of any new structures, however,
would like to see the people able to maintain existing
structures. Decks would be okay if they do not exceed
the hard cover limit.
Michael: Is in favor of structures on the shoreline.
Jensen: Is not in favor of boat houses. She prefers not
to see boat houses as they tend to be an eyesore,
however, in reality she does not believe they can be
totally eliminated. We need a way to deal with them
aesthetically.
Clapsaddle commented that the City of Mound does not enforce their
ordinances. Meyer commented that even if structures on the
shoreline in Mound are maintained and look nice, it won't look nice
in Mound because the lots are too narrow and it would look too
crowded.
Hanus commented that maybe boat houses should be considered
separate from other water orientated structures; he is in favor of
decks and storage buildings. Clapsaddle suggested that boat houses
could be restricted o'n lots which do not meet a certain lot area
requirement or certain amount of lake frontage.
Koegler recited the State's definition for a boat house: "A
structure designed and used solely for the storage of boats or
boating equipment." Michael added that Mound's Zoning Code has an
additional sentence to that definition which states "The top of
which may be used as an enclosed deck with safety railings."
Due to lack of consensus, the Commission determined that Council
Representative Jensen will discuss this issue with the council and
poll them on their opinions at the next COW meeting.
Heiqht of Structures:
The Commission agreed that a 15 foot height limitation for
structures is acceptable.
Planning Commission Minutes April 27, 1992
Shoreland Alterations:
The City Planner presented an "Impervious Cover Inventory."
The Commission determined that allowing 30% hardcover as proposed
in the zoning code modifications is a feasible figure. It was
confirmed that decks, driveways both paved and gravel, sidewalks,
etc. are to be included in this 30%. Should decks be 100% deducted
from impervious cover? The Commission was in favor of reducing the
impervious value for decks and requested the City Planner research
a feasible a figure.
No specific comments were made on the balance of the proposed
ordinance.
TRUTH-IN-HOUSING: UPDATE FROH SUBCOMMITTEE
Chair of the Committee, Michael Mueller, informed the Commission
that they have completed their review of the proposed ordinance,
the next step is to have staff make the changes and have the
electrical inspector review the ordinance. Mueller questioned the
Commission if they wanted an independent inspector/evaluator to
review the ordinance. An evaluator may charge a fee to review the
proposed ordinance. Mueller commented that the evaluators have an
association and suggested we check with them and see if they would
review the ordinance free of charge. Sutherland will check into
getting it reviewed prior to the next workshop meeting.
RESCHEDULE OR CANCEL MAY ZSTH PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING?
Due to a conflict with Memorial Day, the regularly scheduled
meeting of May 25th is rescheduled to May 18th.
CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE'S REPORT
Jensen reviewed the city Council Meeting of April 14, 1992 and the
agenda for the April 28th meeting.
HOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Voss, to adjourn the
meeting at 10~48 p.m. Hotion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
6
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE
AGENDA
7:30 AM Saturday, May 9, 1992
Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E Wayzata Blvd, Rm 135
(Elevator access for handicapped,
use west entrance, Wayzata Blvd)
1. Multiple dock licenses
A. Renewals:
1) Bean's Greenwood Marina, St. Alban's Bay; review incomplete
2) Forest Arms Improvement Association, Forest Lake; per Board
referral
3) Methodist Lakeside Assembly, Wayzata Bay-without change
B. Pending:
1) Shorewood Marina & Yacht Club, Gideons Bay; late fee &
village certification
C. No application received:
1) Lakeside Marina, Maxwell Bay
2) North Shore Drive Marina, Maxwell Bay
3) Roger Wikner, Wayzata Bay
2. Deicing licenses A. Deposit Refunds @$100 each, per report attached
B. Discussion regarding provision for end of season deicing permit
and to allow executive director to issue deicing licenses
3. Second reading of draft ordinance to allow transfer of storage from
a District Mooring Area license to a Multiple Dock license
4. Third reading of draft Ordinance Relating to Storage of Lake
Maintenance Equipment on Lake Minnetonka
5. Second reading of draft Code Amendments recommended by Policies and
Procedures subcommittee, amending Sect. 1.O7, 2.01, 2.03 & 2.06
6. Discussion of Styrofoam used in Dock Construction
7. Restricted vs. non-restricted watercraft, slides and off-lake
storage; appointment of subcommittee to review items covered in
attorney's 3/20/92 letter
8. Expanded sales at dock console facility and dock width for gas
docks; staff recommendation to refer to subcommittee
9. Sect. 2.03 Multiple Dock licenses and Sect.2.05 Special Density
licenses, discussion of committee concern for licensed multiple
docks not installed
10. Additional business recommended by the committee
APR ~9 '92 15:~6 HOLI'ES & GRA'vEI'~ ~'.4
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE
STORAGE OF LAKE MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT ON LAKE MINNETONKA,
AMENDING LMCD CODE
· SECTION 2.03, SUBDIVISION 8
The Board of Directors of the Lake M/_nnetonka Conservation District Ord~__n_s
'that the LMCD Code of Ordinances, Section 2.03, Subd. 8, be amended as follows:
Subd. 8. Specification of Boat Storage Units.
a) Specification of Boat Storage Units. At the time of the issuance of a
license pursuant to this section, all authorized Boat Storage Units at the licensed
facility will be specified by number on a copy of the dock or mooring area plan for
the facility.
b) Storage Rule, No watercraft may be kept, stored, tied or moored except
at the location of a Boat Storage Unit designated as such on a current license issued
pursuant to th/s section, and no facilities requ/ring a license under' this Section may
be used to keep, store, tie oP moor a greater number of watercraft than the total
number of' designated Boat Storage Un/ts fop .that facility.
(~) Special Rule fop Transient Facilities. At the time of the issuance of a
license pursuant to this Section fop transient use facilities or portions of facilities
designated for transient use, the Board shah specify the extent to which such
facilities or portions of facilities are subject to the requirements of subparagraph c)
above. If the Board does not so specify, the following rule shall apply to t.r. ansie.nt
faa. tittles or portions of facilities designated for transient use: No watercraft may De
kept, stored, tied or moored except at the location of a Boat Storage Unit designated
as such on a current license issued pursuant to this section; however, more than one
watercraft may be tied or docked at a Boat Storage Unit, on a transient basis only,
provided such use of the facilities do not represent a hazard to navigation or to the
safety of the public or persons using such facilities.
d)~ Specl-] Rule for Storage of Lake Ma;nteu~-mce_~Eq~pm.ent' Maintenance
equipment su-sh as barites,TM 'harVeSt!n-~ ~cbines, lake dredging: re%bines, _an_il
the ]tke~ ~,¥_ .temporarily be .moored or ?t?re. d. in..un~l~ !o .~.it~n'sm: the vi~Jnit~
~f-the w°~k Sxte for the eqUipment, suD]ect ~o the
/_/ E~ut~mep~_.~ma__y_n3_t. be located at ~ One .site ~as ~defined in
Section l. 02 ~two 'b~-~tn'-~ days before and two busin-'n-~
after work is done in the vicinity of that site.
'. 2_1 E al. ment must .be stored within a dock use ~ d_efhl_ ed in
ion I 02 with the consent o_f the owner of the site~ or in the setbac~ area
~ ar-~-~~ t--~ conseni of the owners of both affected sites.
Sherif~ If at an _time th, e__s~t?__r~a _e_ o_f sueh~.d_ee_m_e~_d,,b' t.~he
to be a hazard to nav!Kation or a threat to t.h.e, public safety, the_
CLL2667~)
1992.
S..heriff may order the o~n_.e,r thereof to move,~.he eq_ulpment to att approprhtte
location. Failure to comply[ with ~ny such order is a misdemeanor.
4) All such equipment must be posted with.the identification of the
owner and name~ address and-teleDhone..number of a person who may be
~:olltacted in an e~rgen.cy or may be notifl~ed.~b¥ the Sheriff~_~if necessary, ~
accorda_n¢~ with the preced!ug para~-raph.
This ordinance is in effect the day following its pUblication.
Adopted by the LMCD Board of Directors this
day of ,
ATTEST:
David Cochran, Chairman
Douglas E. Babcock, Secretary
X,X110-4
2
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
473-7033
MAY 1 1992
L.H.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE
May 1992
Saturday 9
Water Structures Committee
7:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata
Tuesday 12
Environment Committee
8:30 am, Wayzata City Hall, 600 Rice St, Wayzata
Monday 18
Lake Use and Recreation Committee
4:30 pm, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata
Thursday 21
Technical Review Committee
8:00 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata
Friday 22
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
8:30 am, #135 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata
Saturday 25
Memorial Day Holiday
Wednesday 27
7:00 pm, Public Hearing: Excelsior Park charter
boat Wine & Beer applications
7:30 pm, LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting
Tonka Bay City Hall
4-30-92
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
473-7033
EVEN.TS SCHEDULE
MAY 1992
Sun
Sat
Sun
Sat
Sun
Sat
Sun
Mon
Xue
Thu
Sat
Sun
3
9
10
16
16
17
21
23
24
25
26
28
30
31
1:30 pm
10:00 am
10:00 am
1:30 pm
6:30 am
to 3 pm
10:00 am
2:00 pm
2:00 pm
10:00 am
10:30 am
1:30 pm
6:15 pm
10:00 am
2:00 pm
2:00 pm
10:00 am
10:30 am
1:30 pm
10:00 am
10:30 am
1:30 pm
6:15 pm
10:00 am
10:00 am
12 Noon
2:00 pm
6:30 am
to 2:30 pm
10:00 am
11:00 am
1:30 pm
WYC Main Lake Course
MYC Main
MYC Main
WYC Main
MN B.A.S.S. State Federation tournament, from Minnetonka
Power Squadron docks, Big Island Passage
MYC Main
MYC Main
UMYC East
MYC Main
UMYC West
WYC Main
WYC Main
MYC Main
MYC Main
UMYC East
MYC Main
UMYC West
WYC Main
MYC Main
UMYC East
American Jail Association (Henn. Co. Sheriff's Dept.)
fishing contest, Minnetonka Boat Works, Wayzata Bay
.WYC Main
HYC Main
WYC Big Island Course
UHYC East
HYC Main
MN/WI Pro-Am Bass Tournament, North Shore Drive Marina
Maxwell Bay
MYC Main
SYC Big Island
WYC Main
4-3O-92
APR 0 i992.
1992 AMM Annual Meeting
When: Wednesday, May 20, 1992
Where: Radisson Hotel St. Paul
11 East Kellogg Boulevard
(Intersection of Kellogg and Wabasha)
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
3:45 p.m. Jonathan Padelford Cruise
5:30 p.m.
Social Hour
(sponsored)
6:30 p.m.
Buffet Dinner
7:30 p.m.
Annual Business Meeting
9 p.m. Until ?
Music and Dancing
Back Street Boogie Band
Sliced Beef Top Round, Baked
Chicken Rosa, Fettuccine.
Assorted salads and vegetables.
Variety of cakes and mousse.
(Music - Back Street Boogie
Band)
Spouses, significant others and guests are welcomed! Bring your dancing shoes!
Price: $25 per person.
Before all the fun begins at the Radisson, enjoy a relaxing cruise along the Mississippi
River aboard the Jonathan Padelford. The cruise, which includes libations and live
music by the Mouldy Figs, is a 90-minute trip that starts at 4 p.m. (See details on
enclosed sheet.)
1. Reservations for the dinner and the Jonathan Padelford cruise must be made
to Carol Williams (227-4008) no later than Friday, May 15. (Reservations are not
needed if you plan to attend the business meeting portion only. Please channel all
reservations through the office of your City Manager/Administrator.)
2. After a year of testimony and commentary, the Metropolitan Governance Task Force
will present its preliminary report suggesting quite a few changes for the Metropolitan
Council.
See map and meeting agenda on reverse.
The AMM would like to express its appreciation to Bay West Inc.; TKDA
Architects; Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates; Braun Interlec;
BRW, Inc.; and Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch for their underwriting of the social
hour, musical entertainment and the Jonathan Padelford cruise.
DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This invitation has been mailed to Mayors, Council
Members and Managers/Administrators individually.
Business agenda
1. Call to order.
2. Welcome. St. Paul Mayor Jim Scheibel.
3. Recognition of sponsors, retiring officers and board directors.
4. Metropolitan Governance Task Force Report. Bill Barnhart chair.
5. Innovative Project Award. Karen Anderson, Vice President, Presenter.
6. President's Annual Report. Bob Long, President.
7. Annual Election of officers and directors.
A. Report of Nominating Committee (enclosed). Larry
Bakken, Past President, Nominating Committee Chair.
B. Election of President, Vice President and Directors.
8. Comments by President-Elect.
9. Other business.
10. Adjournment.
i~111 STATE
CAPITOL
KELLOGG B~VD.
April 28, 1992
To: AMM Member City Officials
I~OM: Larry Balcken, Nominating Committee Chair
RE: 1992 Nominating Committee Report
Pursuant to the AMM By-laws, a Nominating Committee was appointed by the AMM Board on March 5,
1992. The Committee has completed its work and the below listed officials are recommended for your
consideration at the AMM Annual Meeting on May 20.
FOR PRESIDENT:
Karen Anderson, Council member, Minnetonka (current Vice Presiden0
FOR VICE PRESIDENT:
Dave Childs, Manager, New Brighton (current Board member)
FOR BOARD OF DmECTORS, TWO-YEAR TERM (EIGHT TO lie ELECTED):
*Don Ashworth, Manager, Chanhassen
*Bill Burns, Manager, Fridley
*Joan Campbell, Council member, Minneapolis
*Tom Egan, Mayor, Pagan
Jerry Linke, Mayor, Mounds View
*Betty McCollum, Council member, North St. Paul
Jim Prosser, Manager, Richfield
*Gene White, Council member, Prior Lake
NOTES:
A. Upon election of a new president, the immediate past president, Bob Long, remains on the Board for
one year.
B. Additional candidates may be nominated by any voting delegate at the Annual Meeting.
C. Asterisk denotes incumbents who are eligible for re-election to a two-year term.
BOARD DIRECTOR TERMS NOT EXPIRING (ONE YEAR REMAINING):
Bill Barnhart, Legislative Representative, Minneapolis
Richard Enrooth, Council member, St. Anthony
Ken Mahle Jr., Mayor, Woodbury
Frank Ongaro, Inter. Governmental Affairs Manager, St. Paul
Barbara Peterson, Mayor, Orono
Craig Rapp, Manager, Brooklyn Park
Tom Spies, Council member, Bloomington
Brenda Thomas, Council member, Roseville
NOMINATING COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Larry Bakken, Mayor, Golden Valley
Nancy Jorgenson, Council member, Fridley
Tom Hedges, Administrator, Pagan
Gloria Vierling, Council member, Shakopee
Kevin Frazell, Administrator, Cottage Grove
Peggy Kelly, Council member, Edina
Karl Neid, Council member, St. Paul
All Aboard!
Before the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Annual Meeting convenes, why
not take a relaxing cruise along the M!~$1ssippi River?
The Jonathan Padelford will be leaving the dock at 4 p.m. for a 90-minute get-away
from the hustle and bustle of City Hall life. While aboard, listen to the Dixieland sound
of the Mouldy Figs, enjoy compUmentazy beverages and take in the city sights from a
different perspective.
If you chose to ride the Jonathan PadeZford, you must be on board by 3:45 p.m. When
the boat docks at 5:30, you can cruise on over to the Radisson St. Paul for the social
hour, dinner and evening of fun, courtesy of the AMM and several sponsors.
KELLOGG ILV~ ~ PAUL
R,.,R
I~&DELFORD
LANDING
HARRIET ISLAND
NORTH
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
April 30, 1992
lt~r"D MAY 1 1992
TO: CHIEF HARRELL
FROM: SGT. ROY
I tender my resignation effective the end of my shift which starts on June
30, 1992. My association with the City Of Mound for the past 29.5 years has
afforded me the opportunity to serve the. communitY and advance to my present
position. I wish to thank the city fathers and'members of the police department
for their support through good times and bad. 'l hope when you leave you will feel
as I that the experience was a positive one. Best of luck.
THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE SUBMITTED LETTERS REGARDING THEIR PROPERTY
VALUATION AND THE BOARD OF REVIEW. THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND
THIS EVENING.
LOIS SIMMONS
35 PLEASANT LANE E.
TONKA BAY. MN. 55331
CLARK L. PETERS
2146 NOBLE LANE
MOUND, MN. 55364
472-7440
TED FOX
LAKEWINDS #Al09
PID #19-117-23 24 0069
4407 WILSHIRE BLVD. #F203
PID #13-117-24 31 0073
PID #19-117-23 13 0025
0090
0129
#19-117-23 24 0060
Mound City Counsel
5341Maywood Rd.
Mound, Mn 55364
May 12, 1992
Re: Local property evaluation appraisal PID ~13-117-24-31-0073
Dear Counsel members,
I just received notice of my "reviewed" assessed property
value. I believe this continues to need some consideration.
I am unable to attend the meeting on 5/12/92 because of my
work schedule. The Hennepin county assessor's office in-
formed me that there would be another review meeting schedul-
ed at some time in the future. If there is something more
I need to do in order to attend the future meeting,please in-
form me.
Clark L. Peters
2146 Noble Ln.
Mound, Mn 55364
472-7440
MAY 12, 1992 - MOUND LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
3
& ,
?4
PID t!
NAME & ADDRESS
DAY TIME
t¸O
PID ~I
MAY 12, 1992 - MOUND LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME & ADDRESS
DAY TIME
~HO~E ~
CITY OF MOUND
~72-1155
C)UASI PUBLIC FUNCTION
PORTABLE SIGN APPLICATION
Portable signs used For the purpose of directing the public used in
conjunction with a governmental unit or quasi-public function. The
period of use shall not exceed ten (10) consecutive days and requires
approval of the City Council. Signs shall be placed on the premises
of the advertised event. A permit is required, however is exempt From
all fees.
ADDRESS OF SIGN LOCATION. ~/~/
BUILDING OWNER /~267/q~
(if other than owner) ' [
APPLICANT'S AODRESS ~?~ /L//.~.~/-Z~ ~'
PLEASE INDICATE NUMBER OF SIGNS APPLYING FOR:
PHONE
PHONE
/
DESCRIBE TYPE OF SIGN (materials, ts tt illuminated, etc.):
SIZE OF SIGN REQUESTED: ~ /
LENGTH OF TIME TO BE ERECTED:
DESCRIBE REASON FOR REOUEST:
!
high x ~/ wide = / ~- sq. ft.
Applicant's Signature Date
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Recommendation:
APPRNDVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON:
CITY OF HOUND , 472-1155
QUASI PUBLIC FUNCTION
PORTABLE SIGN APPLICATION
Portable signs used for the purpose of directing the public used in
conjunction with a governmental unit or quasi-public function. The
period of use shall not exceed ten (10) consecutive days and requires
approval of the City Council. Signs shall be placed on the premises
of the advertised event. A permit is required, however is exempt from
all fees.
ADDRESS OF SIGN LOCATION,.
NAME OF APPLICANT
(if other than owner) '
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS ~FT~ /~/~/~Z~P ~
PLEASE INDICATE NUMBER OF SIGNS APPLYING FOR:
DESCRIBE TYPE OF SIGN (~tertais, ts it Illuminated, etc.):
PHONE
PHONE ~T~ ~-? ~
SIZE OF SIGN REQUESTED:--;~/
LENGTH OF TIME TO BE ERECTED:
DESCRIBE REASON FOR REQUEST:
!
high x ~/ wide =
/~- sq. ft.
APPROVED BY CiTY COUNCIL ON:
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 160 · WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEHONE 612/473-7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERS
David H. Cochran, Chair
Greenwood
Tom Reese, Vice Chair
Mound
Douglas E. Babcock, Secretary
Spring Park
J, P. Boswinkel, Treasurer
Minnetonka Beach
Scott Carlson
Minnetrista
Albert (Bert) Foster
Deephaven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
JoEIlen L. Hurt
Orono
William A. Johnstone
Minnetonka
Duane Markus
Wayzata
George C. Owen
Victoria
Tom Penn
Tonka Bay
Robert Rascop
Shorewood
Robert E. Slocum
Woodland
TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: May 8, 1992
FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: APRIL REPORT - LMCD
1.0 GENERAL INTEREST ITEMS.
1.1 Eurasion Watermilfoil Task Force.
Ads have gone out to crew thc operation for the 1992 season. Bids
have been requested for the trucking operation. Wendy Kroll has been
retained to do the data base gathering for the Sonar test in St Albans Bay.
For $7000 she will provide both pre-treatment and post treatment
assessment of the effectiveness. She is a doctoral candidate at the U of M
who has worked with us previously.
The bill sponsored by the County Commissioners and authored by
Senator Judy Traub that would allow the county to fund $75,000 of our
program each year did not ~,et out of the House. That is a real setback to
our program, since we hav~ been told that the DNR will now concentrate its
meager funds on prevention and eradication.
1.2 l~lanasement Plan
The data sub-committee will meet in June to assess the present car
trailer parking availability on the lake. Responses from the cities and actual
count indicates that there are presently 373 spots with another 100
authorized in the new park.
Biocentric Inc has been retained to do the 1992 plan work, which
includes boat counts and attitudinal surveys. This will start Memorial Day.
The new Environmental Committee will meet for the fLrst time next
Tuesday. There has been good response from the 8 agencies and 14 cities
Lnvited to pm~dcipate.
1.3 Other General Interest Items.
A whole day work shop was held this month in order to familiarize
new board members with the complexities of admininstering the lake codes,
and to acquaint them with the history of the LMCD.
It appears that for Forest Arms issue noted last month has been
resolved, at least for the time being.
2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS - MOUND
2.1 The need for public destinations on the lake might be
considered in the non-traversible commons issue. That is an option, though
LAKE MINNETONKA LAKESHOi~ OWNERS
A~SOCLATION. INC.
P.O. BOX 596. KXCEI,~IOR, MN 55331
May 11, 1992
City Council Mound
5341 Maywood Rd
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Earth Day Festival Participant:
The Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association, Kathy Pyatt and Jane
Chiesl, and all Lake Minnetonka area residents wish to extend to you their
deep gratitude for your participation in the Third Annual Lake Minnetonka
Area Earth Day Festival. Those who attended were very excited about the
event and look forward to its continuation and growth.
We would appreciate receiving any comments or suggestions you may have
regarding the event, and look forward to your continued participation in
coming years. Attendance increased 500% this year and we received live
coverage on WCCO's 5:00 p.m. news report. The event was also covered on a
number of radio stations.
The entire Earth Day Festival, including speakers, was taped on cable and
will be broadcast on three cable networks in a series format: Southwest
Community TV (Channel 20); Triax Cable (Channel 20, 21). Please check your
local newspapers for times and dates of this monthly series.
Again, thank you and we look forward to your involvement in the coming
years.
Sincerely,
Kathy Pyatt
Jane Chiesl
CiTY OF MOUND
CRIAS! PUBLIC FUNCTION
PORTABLE SIGN APPLICATION
Portable signs used for the purpose of directing the public used in
conjunction with a governmental unit or quasi-public function. The
period of use shall not exceed ten (10) consecutive days and requires
approval of the City Council. Signs shall be placed on the premises
of the advertised event. A permit is required, however is exempt from
ali fees.
ADDRESS OF SIGN LOCATION
BUILDING OWNER /~
NAME OF APPLICANT
(if other than owner) '
PLEASE INDICATE NUMBER OF SIGNS APPLYING FOR:
DESCRIBE TYPE OF SIGN (materials, ts it Illuminated, etc.):
PHONE
PHONE ~7~.~? ~
SIZE OF SIGN REQUESTED:--:~/
LENGTH OF TIME TO BE ERECTED:
DESCRIBE REASON FOR REQUEST:
!
high x ~,/ wide =
/~- sq. ft.
Applicant's Signature
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Recommendation: ~ ~ ~.~ 7~¢ ,~ ~'
!
APPROVED BY CiTY COUNCIL ON:
LG230
(8oJ9~)
Minnesota Latu~ul Gambling
Application for One-Day
Off-Site Lawful G~mbling
For Board use only
Base License #
Name o! O~ganization
I:q'lone Number I u,=e~e num~ I E=~o~D,lte
( ~-,~ ) EL- o~ 3~c~
Address (street or post office box numbe0
City State Zip code
Name of Chief Executive Officer (please print) Phone Numbe~
1. Name of Iocallon where off-site gambling will be held
2. Address of off-site location ~:> '~'~" City or township State Zip Code
3. Date of one-day event
4. Has your organization conducted off-site gaml~ing l~is calendar year?
[] Yes ~ If yes. what was the date of the event?
-- / ----/ ___
I affirm that the above information is Irue and correct.
/,,,...~S~,,~of Chief Executive .Officer /'~ I Date
1. ~e ci~ must ~gn ~is ~n if ~e gambli~ ~emises is I~t~ ~in ~ limit.
2. The county AND townshio must sign this application if the gambling premises is located within a township.
3. The local unit of government (city or county) must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying Ibis application.
4. A coov of the local unit of aovernment's resolution a~orovina this aoolication must be attached to this a~olication_
6. If this application is denied by the local unit of government, it should not be submitted to the Gambling Conlrol Board.
City or County Township
City or county name Township name
Signature of person receiving application Signature of person receiving application
TilJe Date received Title Date received
Is township · Organized Unorganized Unincorporated
Attach a copy of the lease for the off-site location and a copy
of the approving resolution from the local unit of government
Mail this application to:
Gambling Control Board
Rosewood Plaza South. 3rd Floor
1711 W. County Road B
Roseville. MN 55113
Agr11 29, 1992
John Sutherland
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear John:
Thank you for all your help with the remodeling and the variance
request for 5308 Three Points Blvd. It is a relief to have the
council meetings over and the variance request approved.
With any luck we should be out of your hair in six months. Our
first task is to complete the road side deck. We removed the
stairs last weekend in order to backfill and grade the yard.
After we recover from the costs of remodeling the property we
will tackle our second and last major task, capping the well and
building the lake side deck. Between these two tasks we have
many more outdoor tasks to complete; yard and beach clean up,
window glazing, outdoor painting, dock straightening, etc.
Again, thanks for all your help,
smoother than we expected.
you made this process flow
Thank You,
Nancy and Gary Nordstrom
5308 Three Points Blvd. and
5856 Grandview Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
LG230
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Application for One-Day
Off-Site Lawful Gambling
For Bo xl use only
Base License #
Name of Organization
Addre~ (s~'eet or post Offk~e box number)
Phone Numbe~ I Uce~e number I Expira~/on Dale
City S~ate Zip c~xle
Name of Chief ExeculJve Officer (l~ease print)
Phone Number
1. Name of Ioca~n where off-site gambling will be held
2. Address of off-sim location City or township State Zip Code
3. Da:e of one-day event
4. Has your organization conducted off-site gambling lhis calendar year? [] Yes ~
If yes, what was ~ date of Ihe event?
-- / ---/ __.
I affirm ~hat the above information is true and correct.
~Sig~ of Chief Executive Officer /} I Date
T. The ,i~ mu~t ~n ~i~ ~n ii ~ ~ambli~ ~omi~ i~ I~t~ ~i~in ~ limit. ' ....................
3. ~e ~ml unit of govem~t (d~ or ~n~) must ~ss a mmlufi~ s~ly a~mving or ~ying ~is appF~n.
4. A co~ of ~e I~1 unit of aovemm~rs resolution ~orovina ~is aooli~fion must ~ a~d
6. If ~is appli~fi~ is ~n~ by t~ ~1 unit of gov~m~L it s~uld not ~ submi~ to ~ ~bling C~ ~=d.
City or County Township
City or county name Township name
Signature of person receiving application Signature of person receiving application
TitJe Date received TitJe Date received
Is township:
Organized Unorganized. Unincorporated
Attach a copy of the lease for the off-site location and a copy
of the approving resolution from the local unit of government
Mail this application to:
Gambling Control Board
Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor
1711 W. County Road B
Roseville, MN 55113
5/12/92
THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE SUBMITTED LETTERS REGARDING THEIR PROPERTY
VALUATION AND THE BOARD OF REVIEW. THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND
THIS EVENING.
LOIS SIMMONS
35 PLEASANT LANE E.
TONKA BAY. MN. 55331
PID #19-117-23 24 0069
4407 WILSHIRE BLVD. #F203
CLARK L. PETERS
2146 NOBLE LANE
MOUND, MN. 55364
472-7440
PID #13-117-24 31 0073
TED FOX
LAKEWINDS #Al09
PID #19-117-23 13 0025
0090
0129
#19-117-23 24 0060
Plo 13-'117'2¥ 31
MAY 1 2 199Z
.!
Mound City Counsel
5341Maywood Rd.
Mound, Mn 55364
May 12, 1992
Re: Local property evaluation appraisal PID ~13-117-24-31-0073
Dear Counsel members,
I just received notice of my" reviewed - assessed property
value. I believe this continues to need some consideration.
I am unable to attend the meeting on 5/12/92 because of my
work schedule. The Hennepin county assessor's office in-
formed me that there would be another review meeting schedul-
ed at some time in the future. If there is something more
I need to do in order to attend the future meeting,please in-
form me.
Clark L. Peters
2146 Noble Ln.
Mound, Mn 55364
472-7440
BOARD MEMBERS
David H. Cochran, Chair
Greenwood
Tom Reese, Vice Chair
Mound
Douglas E. Babcock, Secretary
Spring Park
J. P. Boswinkel, Treasurer
Minnetonka Beach
Scott Carlson
Minnetrista
Albert (Bert) Foster
Deephaven
James N. Grathwol
Excelsior
JoEIlen L. Hurr
Orono
William A. Johnstone
Minnetonka
Duane Markus
Wayzata
George C. Owen
Victoria
Tom Penn
Tonka Bay
Robert Rascop
Shorewood
Robert E. Slocum
Woodland
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 160 * WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEHONE 612/473-7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: May 8, 1992
FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: APRIL REPORT - LMCD
1.0
1.1 ' ' '
Ads have gone out to crew thc operation for thc 1992 season. Bids
have been requested for the trucking operation. Wcndy Kroll has been
retained to do the data base gathering for the Sonar test in St Albans Bay.
For $7000 she will provide both pre-treatment and post treatment
assessment of the effectiveness. She is a doctoral candidate at the U of M
who has worked with us previously.
The bill sponsored by the County Commissioners and authored by
Senator Judy Traub that would allow thc county to fund $75,000 of our
program each year ' . That is a real setback to
our program, since we have been told that the DNR will now concentrate its
meager funds on prevention and eradication.
1.2 ~
The data sub-committee will meet in June to assess the present car
trailer parking availability on the lake. Responses from the dries and actual
count indicates that there are presently 373 spots with another 100
authorized in the new park.
Biocentrie Ine has been retained to do the 1992 plan work, which
includes boat counts and attitudinal surveys. This will start Memorial Day.
The new Environmental Committee will meet for the first time next
Tuesday. There has been good response from the 8 agencies and 14 dries
Lnxdted to pardcipate.
1.3 J~~.~lJ~~L,lt~
A whole day work shop was held this month in order to familiarize
new board members with the complexities of admininstering the lake codes,
and to acquaint them with the history of the LMCD.
It appears that for Forest Arms issue noted last month has been
resolved, at least for the time being.
2.0 ~
2.1 The need for public destinations on the lake might be
considered in the non-traversible commons issue. That is an option, though
LAKE MINNETONKA L.AKESHOR. E OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.
P.O. BOX 596, EXCEl. SlOP., MN 55331
May 11, 1992
City Council Mound
5341 Maywood Rd
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Earth Day Festival Participant:
The Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association, Kathy Pyatt and Jane
Chiesl, and all Lake Minnetonka area residents wish to extend to you their
deep gratitude for your participation in the Third Annual Lake Minnetonka
Area Earth Day Festival. Those who attended were very excited about the
event and look forward to its continuation and growth.
We would appreciate receiving any comments or suggestions you may have
regarding the event, and look forward to your continued participation in
coming years. Attendance increased 500% this year and we received live
coverage on WCCO's 5:00 p.m. news report. The event was also covered on a
number of radio stations.
The entire Earth Day Festival, including speakers, was taped on cable and
will be broadcast on three cable networks in a series format: Southwest
Community TV (Channel 20); Triax Cable (Channel 20, 21). Please check your
local newspapers for times and dates of this monthly series.
Again, thank you and we look forward to your involvement in the coming
years.
Sincerely,
Kathy Pyatt
Jane Chiesl
Lake Minnetonka Conservation D£str£ct
May 7, 1992
MAY 8 1992
TO: Data Gathering Committee, Subcommittee of Lake Access Task Force
FROM:
SUBJ:
Lake Access Task Force Chair Jim Grathwol
Study Progress and 7:30 pm Wednesday, June 10, 1992 Meeting Notice
LMCD Office, Norwest Bank Building, Room 160, Wayzata
Thank you for volunteering to serve on this committee. Enclosed is an
information sheet on a preliminary survey update of car/trailer parking
spaces for 1992.
The cities have cooperated in providing information for this survey. No
determination has been made as to "acceptability" of the parking spaces.
The subcommittee will discuss "acceptability" criteria. The Task Force will
ultimately recommend what this committee believes should be designated.
Please visit sites in operation now that the boating season is here. We
need to see if any should be taken off the list, as well as if there are
any areas used for car/trailer parking that have not been listed. We also
want to identify the remaining car/trailer parking spaces that go into the
"historic" count of 1172 spaces that appear in the 1983 Lake Minnetonka Task
Force publication, Page 5.
As you view each site, please note any problem you see with its use. For
example, what kind of surface does it have: paved, gravel or grass? Is
there storm-water runoff treatment before the water reaches the Lake? How
far is parking from the launch ramp, by feet? Is the ramp parking visible
from the Lake? Later we can use this information to help separate desirable
parking from that which is not desirable for the.. Lake environment,
aesthetics, and neighboring area compatibility.
Please RSVP your plans for the Data Gathering Subcommittee meeting, June
10, 1992 at 7:30 pm at the LMCD office by leaving a message with Joan Mansk,
473-7033. (Please use the Wayzata Boulevard entrance on the west side of
the building, which also provides an elevator access.) Your recommendations
will be presented to the Lake Access Task Force.
enc: access report
c/eric: all LATF members
City administrators
LMCD Directors
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
April 30, 1992
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Lake Access Task Force
Gene Strommen, LMCD; Martha Reger, DNR
Update of Public Access Parking on Lake Minnetonka
The 1983 inventory of reliable car/trailer (C/T) and car only
(Car) parking spaces among cities with public accesses on
Lake Minnetonka was updated by Martha Reger and Gene Strommen
during interviews April 13-14 with city officials. The
reliable C/T goal (Goal) and C/T balance (Bal) for each zone
are presented with updates as follows:
C/T 1983 1992 Update C/T
Zone: Goal C/T Car C/T Car Bal
1 North Arm 60 ~ 63 17
SUB TL ZONE 1 139 60 0 63 17 76
2
Grays Bay 24 0 37 6 (1)
Causeway
Grays Bay Dam 19 11 19 11
Wayzata Bay 3 o 25 10
Arlington
SUB TL ZONE 2 144 46 11 81 27
63
3
Carsons Bay
SUB TL ZONE 3
0 0 40 20 (2)
155 0 0 40 20 115
4
Spring Park Bay
Phelps Bay~
Tuxedo Blvd
SUB TL ZONE 4
126
79 2 93 6 (3)
o o _~ _~o
79 2 97 6
29
5
Halsted Bay,
Williams St.
Kings Point DNR
Hennepin Parks
Regional Park
Cooks Bay,
Mounds Bay Park
SUB TL ZONE 5
0 0 30 0 (4)
0 0 32 0 (5)
0 0 100 0 (6)
o ~ 30, ~ tT~
136 0 0 192 0 + [36]
TOTALS 700 185. 1~ 473 7~ 227
(1) Based upon plans for future re-designed Causeway access.
(2) Anticipates organizing gravel lot near city hall; does
not include C/T spaces available at school on Vine Hill
Rd; possible 5+/- C/T spaces on Cottage Wood Rd to west.
(3) Includes 19 on site, 4 across street, 70 at maint, lot.
UPDATE OF PUBLIC ACCESS PARKING, 4/30/92, P. 2
(4) Estimate for one side of Williams St. within 1,500 ft.,
more ~pace available further distant on Williams St.~
but not likely in demand for this lesser-used access.
{5) This access was not in existence during 1983 study. The
access future is tied to the outcome of Hennepin
Regional Park, now being developed. Access lightly used
¢6) Hennepin Regional Park is committed to 100 C/T spaces,
with public availability one to two or more years away.
(7) More space may be available in a commercial office
building about 1,500 ft. from the access which could
provide about 25 C/T spaces on weekends, and also some
lesser number during weekdays.
FINDINGS:
There are a number of probable C/T spaces which could be
added to the Lake Minnetonka inventory. These require
further review and negotiation with property owners, such
as the commercial building in Mound and public officials.
Few additional spaces exist on streets~ the limitation
being distance away from the access site. Readily
available street parking has been identified and is being
put into use formally or informally.
Maxwell Bay access study represents a key in securing a
block of new C/T spaces. The present DNR site recently
acquired is to either be combined with or relinquished to
a more efficient use of alternative sites within that
area which could accommodate 50 or more new C/T spaces.
At the same time, boat access to Maxwell Bay would be
reduced through the acquisition of likely one marina in
that area.
e
The City of Mound is taking public input on a concept to
redevelop its downtown commercial district. The concept
proposes new lake access through the Lost Lake Channel.
An opportunity exists at this site to accommodate a
public access as part of this redevelopment.
The south side of Lake Minnetonka presents a challenge
for locating an access which would accommodate a
reasonable C/T space addition while maintaining the
integrity of the surrounding residential area.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
MN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Lake Access Task Force
April 15, 1992
TO:
Data Sub-Committee
FROM:
Gene Strommen, LMCD
Martha Reger, MN DNR
SUBJECT: Car/Trailer City Parking Inventory Update
An inventory of city places known to presently 'accommodate
car/trailer (c/t) parking spaces in and around free public
accesses was conducted 4/13-4/14 by Martha Reger, Trails &
Waterways, and Gene Strommen, LMCD.
Among the lake's 14 cities, Greenwood, Excelsior, Minnetonka
Beach, Shorewood, Victoria and Woodland presently have no
public boat launch access. Review by city of those which do
have public boat launch accesses resulted in these findings:
DEEPHAVEN, Carson's Bay City Access:
* Free public parking at or adjacent to access
-- none
# Free public parking approximately. 1,000 ft. from access:
An unmarked gravel lot presently accommodates 20-25
c/t. It was observed, however, that this number could
be significantly increased by designating spaces with
post markers and directional signs, possibly doubling
the capacity.
* Free public parking approximately 1/2 mile from access:
School parking lots on Vine Hill Road would accommodate
some c/t spaces. The distance would necessitate a
shuttle service, agreement with school district.
* Space on the south side of Cottagewood Road heading east
could provide for about five additional c/t spaces, no
adjacent residence being impacted.
- Signs at the access are needed to direct public to
permitted c/t parking.
- Free arking by permit available to Deephave~ residents
occupy 17 spaces along the railroad right-of-way by Mlnne-
tonka Boulevard. Public may purchase this permit for $60.
Few have been purchased in recent years. (checking)
DEEPHAVEN, St. Louis Bay:
* Boat launch access is provided near swim beach before June
15 and after Sept. 1, no parking associated with access,
for launching boats for on-lake dock storage during season
and removal at the season's end.
Winter Access available via street ends, over city docks by
foot on Minnetonka Blvd., and Carson's Bay vehicle access.
C/T City Parking Inventory Update, 4/15/92, P. 2
ORONO, North Arm, Hendrickson Bridge County Access:
Free public parking on improved, paved access site, 64 c/t
spaces and ll car only spaces.
* C/t parking starting 1,500 ft. from access permitted on
south side of County Rd 51 from Balder Park Rd to Tonkawa
Rd. {County 135) providing approximately 20 c/t spaces.
* Nearby city streets posted no parking to preserve
residential character of neighborhoods.
* Unimproved shoulder parking on Shoreline Dr. (County 51),
Browns's Bay, for hand-launched trailered or car-top
fishing boats, estimating five available c/t spaces or
more for cars only.
* Designated shoulder parking on Shoreline Dr., Smith's Bay,
east of Arcola Bridge, for 3 or 4 cars for shore fishing.
* Proposed DNR Maxwell Bay access not considered at this
time.
Winter Access via street ends scattered among 28 miles of
lake shoreline, with public use concentrated on city streets
ending adjacent to county roads, well used.
SPRING PARK~ Spring Park Bay~ Spring Park County Access:
* Free public parking on improved, paved access site, 19 c/t
spaces, 6 car only spaces.
* Nearby County Rd. 51 parking, four c/t spaces about 400
ft. from access.
* County public works maintenance yard about 1,500 ft. from
access parking could serve 50 or more c/t spaces with more
efficient spacing of county reserve sand/dirt piles and
off-season equipment storage. Directional signs and
markers to designate parking spaces are necessary. Signs
at the access site designate availability of this lot for
parking. It is well used, but use count varies.
* Northern Avenue, about 1,500 ft. from the access, has
extensive c/t parking available on the south side along
the railroad right-of-way, or by improving the street
shoulder.
* Boaters presently do find parking open along Warren Ave.,
about .4 mile west and north of the access. Considering
the popularity of this access~ this area has expansion
potential with angle or perpendicular c/t parking. Area
is commercial, and adjacent to city hall.
* Advance Machine site, north of County 15 and west of 51,
has interim parking possibilities. Considering the
development potential of this site, and present use by
Lord Fletcher's Restaurant, it is doubtful a long-term
arrangement would be possible here.
Car/Trailer Parking Inventory Update, 4/15/92, P. 3
Dakota Rail property east and west of County 51 on the
south side of the tracks has further c/t parking
potential. Property is presently for lease/sale, which
could make a long-term (5 year minimum) arrangement
doubtful. Land purchase/lease may be worth investigating.
(CONTACT: Robin Ripley, Dakota Rail, Inc.,
25 Adams St. N., Hutchinson~ MN 55350, 612/587-4018)
* Winter access at Spring Park access, Mapleton Ay. only
~ city street end.
MOUND~ Cooks Bay, Mound Bay Park City Access:
* Free public parking on access site on weekdays only, none
available weekends or holidays.
* Free public parking designated on sign at access entrance
on Beachwood Rd., 1,000 ft. east of access. About 500 ft.
of space available on one side of street, 10 c/t spaces.
The new home development on other side of street may
prompt requests to prohibit this parking in the future.
* Free public parking designated on sign at access entrance
on Commerce Blvd., 1,500 ft. north of access. About 15
c/t spaces available on approximately 800 ft. of street.
* Public parking on Bartlett Blvd., 600 ft. north of access,
prohibited for about first 600 ft. of this county road.
Parking beyond this point is open for about six c/t.
* Potential new parking identified by Mound city staff on a
business site within 1,600 ft. of the access on Commerce
Blvd. Only a few employees work on weekends. Some space
may be available weekdays, or weeknights. Formal striped
paved parking lot has 32 spaces, all of which could be
used for c/t parking, trailers backed into open natural
vegetative-cover border area.
Lease arrangement with GTE owners could be mutually
beneficial for up to 90% of parking space for weekends.
* Minor summer access for car-top or hand-launched small
boats exists among some neighborhood street ends, not
expected to serve season-long general public access.
* Six miles of city shoreline accommodate 4-1/2 miles of
city commons dock sites.
* A concept is presently being introduced to develop
consider a redevelopment of downtown Mound, to include
activating Lost Lake and its channel for possible new
multi-family dwelling units. This poses the prospect of a
public lake access share in this redevelopment plan.
* A public fishing pier has been applied for through DNR in
recent years, with approval still pending, at the Mound
Bay Park site.
Winter access is generous through a variety of street ends.
Car/Trailer City Parking Inventory Update~ 4/15/92~ P. 4
MINNETRISTA, Halsted & Phelps Bays, City and DNR Access:
* Williams Street (at corner of Halsted Drive}~ Halsted Bay~
city access~ has approximately 1/2 mile of roadway west of
access~ which would allow approximately 30 c/t spaces
within 1,500 ft. Some portions of street would allow
parking on both sides. Potential parking count could
reach 50 within 1,500 ft. Parking is available beyond
1,500 ft. but considered out of normal user reach. Since
this is an unimproved access, dirt ramp and shallow except
for small fishing boats, and at the far west end of the
lake, it is unlikely 50 c/t spaces would be in demand
except on possibly a prime day such as the fishing opener
in May. Parking on Halsted Dr. north of the access, is
not allowed. Some allowance would appear possible without
interference to adjoining residential properties on one
side of the street.
* Kings Point~ Halsted Bay~ DNR access~ north end of Kings
Point Rd.~ serves small fishing boats, total of 32 c/t
spaces. Public route via Hwy 7, 1.5 miles to south.
This access has been identified as intended to be taken
out of use as the Hennepin Parks 100 c/t parking spaces
are put in place.
Tuxedo Blvd. access at Zimmerman Pass~ north of Red Bridge
is essentially a street end which accommodates
neighborhood use. City notes 4 c/t spaces available, more
if users move farther back on residential streets.
Crane and Eagle Islands access, Casameta Rd., West Upper
Lake~ serves island residents and one main shore residence
CBedor). Not considered a public launch access.
Woodend Shores, ~West Upper Lake, a private homeowners
assn. access~ gets some uninvited public access use.
Fire lanes are open for winter access, Eastview Ave. in
Sennings Bay well used.
Shore fishing on County Rd. 44 adjacent to Halsted Bay
accommodates the public. Roadside improvements could also
aid hiking and biking. Ten car spaces now available.
City Planner Jay Blake and City Council member/LMCD board
member Scott Carlson point out the city's concern that
lake access be spread across the designated zones, sharing
the responsibility for public access with all cities.
They also asked how non~riparians in a city get counted
for public access? The city also hopes to keep up the
natural characteristics of the lake at the west end.
WAYZATA~ Grays and Wayzata Bays, City Access:
* Grays Bay Causeway Access~ County Hwy 101~ presently
unimproved, ramp and parking access gravel/dirt. First
come parking on unmarked irregular surface results in
variable space for cars using adjacent shore fishing and
c/t units.
* Re-designed Grays Bay Causeway Access is scheduled to
provide 37 c/t and 6 car spaces, operated by county.
C/T City Parking Inventory Update, 4/15/92, P. 5
* City Access, Wayzata Bay, County Rd. 16, between Wayzata
Yacht Club properties, has designated c/t parking on north
side, trailers angled into railroad right-of-way. Random
piles of railroad-cut trees/brush restricts parking to
about 10 c/t spaces adjacent to access. Additional
parking starts north of railroad tracks into Circle Dr.
and Circle Av. and east on Lake St. and along County 16
west to Wayzata Bay Center, including the Center parking
lot. Approximately 25-30 such spaces are estimated in
these undesignated adjacent street/Center parking lot
* Winter access is available through above access, second
non-summer access west of Rosecranz property~ and at
Wayzata Public Swim Beach, west of Minnetonka Boat Works,
near Barry Ay.
MINNETONKA, Grays Bay Dam:
* Present site operated by Hennepin County provides 19 c/t
and ll car spaces. It is a fully-improved site with two
lane access. Drawback is winding approach through narrow
residential streets. No external signs to designate
location on Minnetonka Blvd., but well-used.
* Libbs Lake Park and Swim Beach, has ten car spaces which
are used by persons shore fishing.
TONKA BAY~ Lower Lake South, Gideon, LaFayette and Old
Channel Bays provide the city's shoreline:
* Principal lake access is through Fire Lanes which are
divided into Class I, II and III. Class I has 15 fire
lanes for pedestrian access, shore fishing and launching
of car-top small boats. Class II includes four additional
fire lanes which allow same as Class I plus winter
snowmobile access. Class III has one fire lane, # 5 at N.
Waseca Av., which provides only shore fishing~ boat
launching and winter vehicular access to lake, but no
parking of automobiles or c/t on or adjacent to fire lane.
* City has a 23-slip public marina on Manitou Rd./County 19~
adjacent to city hall on south side. An unimproved dirt
launch ramp provides access for small boats. City
officials advise this is posted for no launching during
season. Officials believe public access would invite
vandalism to boats stored in marina. City has recently
applied for and been granted an additional ten slide
storage spaces which would provide for shore storage of
small fishing boats, rentals open to city residents.
Narrows channel is open to public shore fishing~
maintained by the county.
- end -