1994-01-11CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT; The City of Mound, through
teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that
respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing
community.
AGENDA
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 1994
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 9, 1993, BUDGET
MEETING AND THE DECEMBER 14, 1993, REGULAR
MEETING AND THE DECEMBER 22, 1993, SPECIAL EMERGENCY
MEETING. PG. 5-16
PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A
DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED AT 2563 LOST LAKE ROAD,
LOT 18, BLOCK 1, LOST LAKE ADDITION. (NOTE:
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARD CASE ON DECEMBER 13, 1993
AND CONTINUED THE MATFER TO JANUARY 10, 1994 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING. RESOLUTION FROM JANUARY 10, 1994,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BE DISTRIBUTED AT
COUNCIL MEETING). PG. 17-41
RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING THE FOLLOWING PERSONS: MARK HANUS
AND BILL VOSS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION; AND MARK BREWER
AND JERRY LONGPRE TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
3 YEAR TERMS - EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 1996. PG. 42
RESOLUTION APPOINTING LIZ JENSEN ACTING MAYOR FOR
1994. PG. 43
RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY CLERK, FRAN CLARK, ACTING CITY
MANAGER FOR 1994. PG. 44
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LAKER THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER
FOR 1994. PG. 45-46
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000
BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK. PG. 47
19.
20.
21.
22.
SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT IN THE B-1
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 5533 SHORELINE DRIVE.
(SUGGESTED DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1994.)
PG. 125-127
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMITrAL OF THE 1994 MUNICIPAL
RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY. PG. 128-130
PAYMENT OF BILLS.
PG. 131-144
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for December 1993.
PG. 145-158
LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for December
1993. (Will be distributed Tuesday evening.)
C. LMCD Mailings. PG. 159-161
D. Planning Commission Minutes of December 13, 1993.
PG. 162-167
Eo
Resolution approved by the City of Spring Park
RE: Dissolution of the LMCD.
PG. 168
Fe
Information from the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC)
and Government Training Service (GTS) RE: Conference
for Newly Elected Officials and three pre-conference
seminars offered by GTS and Women in City Government
entitled, ~Resolving Conflicts: Options for Material
Gain", Enhancing your City's Response to Citizens", and
'Stress Reduction Through Time Management". The
pre-conference seminars would benefit incumbents as
well as newly elected officials. If you are interested
in these seminars, please contact Fran ASAP to register.
PG. 169-171
Information RE: Applications for 1994 National League
of Cities (NLC) Steering Committee Appointments. If
interested, let Fran know ASAP.
PG. 172-174
He
REMINDER: Information from NLC RE: NLC Congressional/
City Conference to be held in Washington, D.C.
March 12-15, 1994. If interested in attending, please
let Fran know ASAP. PG. 175
REMINDER: Committee of the Whole Meeting (COW),
Tuesday, January 18, 1994, 7:30 P.M.
3
CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT; The City of Mound, through
teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that
respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing
community.
AGENDA
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 1994
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
e
o
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 9, 1993, BUDGET
MEETING AND THE DECEMBER 14, 1993, REGULAR
MEETING AND THE DECEMBER 22, 1993, SPECIAL EMERGENCY
MEETING. PG. 5-16
PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A
DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED AT 2563 LOST LAKE ROAD,
LOT 18, BLOCK 1, LOST LAKE ADDITION. (NOTE:
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARD CASE ON DECEMBER 13, 1993
AND CONTINUED THE MATI~ER TO JANUARY 10, 1994 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING. RESOLUTION FROM JANUARY 10, 1994,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WILL BE DISTRIBUTED AT
COUNCIL MEETING). PG. 17-41
RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING THE FOLLOWING PERSONS: MARK HANUS
AND BILL VOSS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION; AND MARK BREWER
AND JERRY LONGPRE TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -
3 YEAR TERMS - EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 1996. PG. 42
RESOLUTION APPOINTING LIZ JENSEN ACTING MAYOR FOR
1994. PG. 43
RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY CLERK, FRAN CLARK, ACTING CITY
MANAGER FOR 1994. PG. 44
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LAKER THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER
FOR 1994. PG. 45-46
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000
BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK. PG. 47
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
RESOLL~ION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000
BOND FOR THE CITY TREASURER/FINANCE DIRECTOR. PG. 48
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR
1994. PG. 49
RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE FOLLOWING AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES
TO THE FOLLOWING COMMISSIONS: ANDREA AHRENS TO THE PARK &
OPEN SPACE COMMISSION; LIZ JENSEN TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION;
AND KEN SMITH TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
(EDC). PG. 50
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
CASE//93-059; OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CHURCH, 2385 COMMERCE
BLVD., LOTS 6, 7, 8 7 9, AUDITOR'S SUBD. /1167, LOTS
1, 2 & 3, GUILFORD'S REARR. OF MOUND BAY PARK,
PID #14-117-24 44 0005.
REQUEST: LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR ADDITION.
PG. 51-71
CASE g93-061: BOYER BUILDING CORPORATION, 2820 TUXEDO
BLVD. (PELICAN POINT). PHELPS ISLAND PARK 1ST DIVISION,
PID #19-117-23 31 0003.
REQUF~T: SKETCH PLAN REVIEW.
PG. 72-88
~ DON & TERRY BONNICKSEN, 2156 CENTERVIEW
LANE, LOTS 8 & 31, BLOCK 7, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO
LAKESIDE PARK, PID #13-117-24 31 0052.
(NOTE: CASE TO BE HEARD AT THE JANUARY 10, 1994, PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING. RESOLUTION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION
WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TUESDAY EVENING.)
REQUEST: VARIANCE FOR GARAGE.
PG. 89-101
DISCUSSION: SECTION 350:760, SUBD. 4 - TRUCK PARKING IN
RESIDENTIAL AREAS. PG. 102-106
DISCUSSION: TIME LIMITS ON BUILDING COMPLETIONS. PG. 107-124
BID AWARD: WATER METER READING EQUIPMENT.
(MATERIAL TO BE DISTRIBUTED TUESDAY EVENING.)
19.
20.
21.
22.
SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT IN THE B-1
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 5533 SHORELINE DRIVE.
(SUGGESTED DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1994.)
PG. 125-127
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMITrAL OF THE 1994 MUNICIPAL
RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY. PG. 128-130
PAYMENT OF BILLS.
PG. 131-144
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for December 1993.
PG. 145-158
LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for December
1993. (Will be distributed Tuesday evening.)
C. LMCD Mailings. PG. 159-161
D. Planning Commission Minutes of December 13, 1993.
PG. 162-167
Resolution approved by the City of Spring Park
RE: Dissolution of the LMCD.
PG. 168
Information from the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC)
and Government Training Service (GTS) RE: Conference
for Newly Elected Officials and three pm-conference
seminars offered by GTS and Women in City Government
entitled, "Resolving Conflicts: Options for Material
Gain", Enhancing your City's Response to Citizens", and
"Stress Reduction Through Time Management". The
pre-conference seminars would benefit incumbents as
well as newly elected officials. If you are interested
in these seminars, please contact Fran ASAP to register.
PG. 169-171
Go
Information RE: Applications for 1994 National League
of Cities (NLC) Steering Committee Appointments. If
interested, let Fran know ASAP.
PG. 172-174
REMINDER: Information from N-LC RE: NLC Congressional/
City Conference to be held in Washington, D.C.
March 12-15, 1994. If interested in attending, please
let Fran know ASAP. PG. 175
REMINDER: Committee of the Whole Meeting (COW),
Tuesday, January 18, 1994, 7:30 P.M.
Ke
Me
Information RE: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
(MCWD).
REMINDER: Interviews for a vacancy on Park & Open
Space Commission will be held on Thursday,
January 13, 1994, 7:00 P.M., Mound City Hall.
Resumes/letters of interest are enclosed. Please
make every effort to attend.
REMINDER: Interviews for a vacancy on the Economic
Development Commission (EDC) will be held at 7:00 A.M.,
Thursday, January 20, 1994. Applications are enclosed.
Please make every effort to attend.
Letter from Rep. Steve Smith RE: Public hearing Safe
Schools Task Force to be held Wednesday, January 12,
1994, 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. in the Board Room, Westonka
Community Center, 5600 Lynwood Blvd., Mound.
PG. 176-184
PG. 185-186
PG. 187-189
PG. 190-193
4
December 9, 1993
MINUTES - BUDGET HEARING - DECEMBER 9, 1993
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM. City Council members present were: Mayor Skip
Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, ,t~, Ken Smith. Also present
were: City Manager Ed Shukle; Fran Clark, City Clerk; Greg Skinner, Water and Sewer
Superintendent; Jon Sutherland, Building Official; Jim Fackler, Parks Director; Len Harrell,
Police Chief; Joe! Krumm, Liquor Store Manager; Gino Businaro, Finance Director; Don
Bryce, Fire Chief and newly elected Fire Chief Steve Erickson, and the following interested
persons: Vince Forystek and Ray Salazar.
The Mayor asked the City Manager to present the introductory comments to the 1994 proposed
budget. City Manager, Ed Shukle explained the purpose of the budget hearing. He indicated
that this was the annual Truth in Taxation hearing. The purpose of the hearing was to discuss
the proposed budget and tax levy for the upcoming year. He further indicated that in September
the City Council approved a preliminary budget and levy and that the proposed budget and levy
for final apprOval has not changed. The City Council would have the authority to reduce the
tax levy if they so desired, but they could not increase the tax levy from what they approved in
September. He then went into some of the highlights of the budget. Finance Director, Gino
Businaro, explained how the levy would impact property tax statements on various valued homes
in Mound. The City Manager then indicated that he or the Finance Director would take
questions.
The Mayor opened the public heating. After some general questions were raised by Vince
Forystck and Ray Salazar, Mayor Johnson closed the public hearing. There was no need to
continue with hearing as all questions were answered.
The Council stated that the levy and budget will be on the Agenda of the December 14, 1993,
Regular Meeting for consideration.
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at 9:20 P.M. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
Mound City Council Minutes December 14, 1993
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 14, 1993
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday,
December 14, 1993, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, and
Phyllis-Jessen. Councilmember Smith was absent and excused. Also present were: City
Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson, Building
Official Jori Sutherland and the following interested citizens: Michael Koch, Alan Held, Lyn
Hexum, Steve Homola, Steve Sunnarborg, Diane Maloney, Deb Kullberg, Jeremiah Frolund,
Jeff Frolund, Mark Stone and Mark Annand.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
The Mayor announced the Jeff Martin, 1578 Eagle Lane is the latest winner in the recyclotto
drawing on December 13, 1993. He will receive $250 Westonka Dollars.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to approve the Minutes of the
November 23, 1993, Regular Meeting, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
1.1
PUBLIC HEARING: CASE ~t93-057: CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A "COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT
NOT AlqqLIATED WITH THE PRINCIPAL USE)" IN THE B-2 ZONINC
DISIRICT AT 4451 WILSHIRE BLVD. (OLD DONNIE'S)
The Building Official explained the request and that the Planning Commission recommended
approval with the following conditions:
The City does hereby grant a Conditional Use Permit for a "Commercial Parking Lot
(not affiliated with the principal use)" at 4451 Wilshire Blvd., upon the following:
Parking be limited to automobiles, passenger vehicles and trucks
not more than a one ton capacity. Specifically, no boat, boat
trailer, or motorcycle parking is allowed.
B. All vehicles must be currently licensed and in operable condition.
Mound City Council Minutes
C.
December 14, 1993
Ail other non-related activities shall be prohibited. Specifically,
the premises shall not be used for the repair or maintenance of
such vehicles. No activity commonly referred to tailgating shall
be ermitt , nor shill there be any unn a ,'y noise after the
hour of 9:00 p.m.
If it is determined that a public nuisance exists, the City may
terminate this Conditional Use Permit upon written notice.
City Council may at any time during the term of the Conditional
Use Permit determine that a landscape plan must be submitted and
installed to create a buffer between this and the adjacent residential
zones.
F. Annual review of the Conditional Use Permit be required by the
City Council at a Public Heating.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. The following persons spoke in favor of the Conditional
Use Permit:
Michael Koch, Garsten Management and Alan Held, Tumquist Properties.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
After discussion the Council added several items to the conditions as follows:
Parking be limited to automobiles, passenger vehicles and trucks not more than
a one ton capacity. Specifically, no motor homes~ no boat, boat trailer, or
motorcycle parking is allowed.
The City Manager and the applicant shall designate on the Master Plan (Exhibit.
A attached) the area vehicles may be parked._
l_.akewinds Sports & Yacht Association shall be responsible for monitoring the
pr0_~erty to comply with this Conditional Use Permit and shall establish
restrictions and regulations which will allow the association to have violator':~
vehicles towed from the premises.
Mr. Koch agreed with the added conditions.
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
Mound City Council Minu~s
December 14, 1993
RESOLUTION//93-155
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR A "CO~RCIAL PARKING LOT
(NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE PRINCIPAL USE)"
AT 4451 WILSHIRE BLVD. (OLD DONNIE'S) LOTS
3 TO 18 INCLUDING VACATED ROAD, BLOCK 8,
AVALON, PID//19-117-23 31 0021, P & Z CASE//93-
057
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.2
CASE g9;~-053: STEVE SUNNARBORG, 4924 EDGEWATER DRIVE, LOT 15,
SKARP & LINDQUIST'S RAVENSWOOD, PID//13-117-24 41 0013. VARIANCE
FOR ADDITION.
The Building Official explained the request. He stated that the Planning Commission was quite
pleased with the revised plan submitted by the applicant. The request is now in a conforming
location and does represent a substantial improvement of the property. The Planning
Commission recommended approval. The Council complimented the applicant on his revised
plan.
Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//93-156
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING
SETBACKS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
CONFORMING ADDITION AT 4924 EDGEWATER
DRIVE, LOT 15, SKARP & LINDQUIST'S
RAVENSWOOD, PID//13-117-24 41 0013, P & Z CASE
//93-053
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.3
CASE//93-060: STEVE HOMOLA, 2420 WESTEDGE BLVD., SECTION 23, PID
//23-117-24 22 0005, VARIANCE FOR GARAGE ADDITION.
The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//93-157
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING
STREET FRONTAGE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION
OF A CONFORMING GARAGE ADDITION AT 2420
WESTEDGE BLVD., THAT PART OF
Mound City Council Minutes
December 14, 1993
GOVERNMENT LOT 4, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP
117, RANGE 24, PID//23-117-24 22 0005, P & Z CASE
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.4 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
The Mayor asked that Section 350:760, Subd. 4, for the City Code relating to 'Truck Parking
in Residential Areas', be reviewed to see if it is too restrictive. He stated it reads as follows:
'No motor vehicle over one (1) ton capacity bearing a commercial license and no commercially
licensed trailer shall be parked or stored in a platted residential district or a public street except
when loading, unloading, or rendering a service. Recreation vehicles and pickups are not
restricted by the terms of this provision. ~ The Council discussed the item briefly.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to refer this matter to the City
Manager and the Planning Staff to study Section 350:760, Subd. 4, and review what
other communities are doing in this area. This could come back to the Council for
further review at the Committee of the Whole Meeting, January 18, 1994. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The City Attorney reminded the Council that if this section were to be changed it would require
Planning Commission input and a public hearing before action. Also it would require 4/5 vote
of the City Council to be adopted.
1.5 APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 437:00, SUBD. 5~
437:10, SUBD. 1, c.; 437:10, SUBD. 11; AND 437:15; RELATING TO DOCK
The City Manager explained that this back from the last meeting for the Council approval in
ordinance form.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following:
ORDINANCE//66-1993
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 437:00,
SUBD. 5; 437:10, SUBD. 1.c; 437:10, SUBD. 11; AND
437:15; RELATING TO DOCK LICENSES
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.6 REOUEST FOR CONSTRU~:TION ON PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT, LYN HEXUM.
1543 BLUEBIRD LANE, FOR STAIRWAY ON WAURIKA COMMONS, DOCK
Mound City Council Minutes December 14, 1993
The Building Official explained the request. The Park Commission recommended approval.
Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION t193-158
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION
ON PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT TO REPLACE A
STAIRWAY ON WAURIKA COMMON, DOCK SITE
g01560, ABUTTING 1543 BLUEBIRD LANE IN PART
OF LOTS 1, 2, & 32, BLOCK 6, WOODLAND POINT
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.7
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR VFW
POST//5113, 2544 COMMERCE BLVD. FOR LAWFUL GAMBLING.
The City Clerk explained the request.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION g93-159
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT
APPLICATION FOR VFW POST //5113, 2544
COMMERCE BLVD.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.8
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY OF MOUND AS THE LOCAl.
C.,O~~NT UNIT (LGU) REGULATING THE WETLAND CONSERVATION
The City Manager explained that this resolution came from the City Engineer. The City
Attorney suggested that the Council consider appointing the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
as the LGIJ. The Council discussed this and decided they would appoint themselves the LGU
for the time being. That decision can be changed in the future if need be.
Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//93-160
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY OF
MOUND AS THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT
(LGU) REGULATING THE WETLAND
CONSERVATION ACT OF 1991
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
$0
Mound City Council Minutes December 14, 1993
1.9 APPLICATION FOR LIVE MUSIC CONCERT PERMIT AT MOUND BAY PARK
DEPOT FOR 1994 FOR THOMAS P, JOHNSTON ON BEHAI.F OF MOUND
ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH (REOUF~T INCLUDI~$ WAIVING OF VEE)
The City Clerk explained that this request is for January - April 1994. At this point there are
two dates (January 9 and April 3) that the Depot will not be available because it has already
been rented. Deb Kullberg, one of the applicants, stated that if there were future conflicts where
someone wanted to rent the Depot, her group would find other accommodations. She also
requested that the fee be waived.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to approve a Live Music Concert
License to the Mound Free Church/Mound Assembly of God Church for one year
beginning January 1, 1994, to be used at the Depot in Mound Bay Park on Sunday
evenings, on a space available basis. All fees are to be waived for the license and
use of the Depot. The applicant is to work with the License Department on the use
of the Depot. The License Department is to give the group as much notice as
possible if there is a conflict in the use of the Depot. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
1.10
SET PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A DRAINAGE
EASEMENT LOCATED AT 2563 LOST LAKE ROAD, LOT 18, BLOCK 1, LOST
LAKE ADDITION
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen to set a public hearing date of
January 11, 1994, to consider the vacation of a drainage easement located at 2563
Lost Lake Road, Lot 18, Block 1, Lost Lake Addition. The vote was unanimously
in favor. Motion carried.
1.11 SET BID OPENING DATE FOR WATER METER READER EQUIPMENT
The City Manager explained that this is another phase of the sewer and water improvement
bonds that were sold this year. This will allow the Water Department to purchase a system to
read water meters remotely.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to set a bid opening date of January
5, 1994, at 11:00 A.M. for water meter reading equipment. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.12 1t994 BUDGET AND LEVY RESOLUTION
The City Manager explained that the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing was held last Thursday,
December 9, 1993, and now the resolution needs to be approved.
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
Mound City Council Minutes December 14, 1993
RESOLUTION//93-161
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1994 FINAL
GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF
$2,366,950; SETTING THE FINAL LEVY AT
$1,783,620; LESS THE HOMESTEAD
AGRICULTURAL CREDIT (HACA) OF $494,800,
RESULTING IN A FINAL CERTIFIED LEVY OF
$1,288,820 AND APPROVING THE FINAL OVERALL
BUDGET FOR 1994
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.13 WATER & SEWER RATE INCREASE
The City Manager explained that when the bonds were sold for the water and sewer
improvements, a 5 % increase in water and sewer rates was proposed to help pay back the bonds.
This increase was reflected in the proposed 1994 Budget that was just approved. The City Code
now needs to be amended to reflect the increase as of January 1, 1994.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following:
ORDINANCE #67-1993
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 540:00, SUBD.
3 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO SEWER
RATES; AND AMENDING SECTION 540:00, SUBD.
13, a. & b. OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO
WATER RATES
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.14
RESOL~0N TO TERMINATE THE 401 QUALIFIED PLAN ADMINISTERED
BY THE INTERNATIONAL CITY COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
flCMA) RETIREMENT CORPORATION
The City Manager explained that when he began as city manager on January 1, 1986, he came
to the City with retirement plans through the International City County Management Association
(ICMA) Retirement Corporation. Basically, the city council through Resolutions//85-159, #85-
160 and #85-161 provided the opportunity for him to no longer be a member of the Public
Employees Retirement Association (PERA); to establish a deferred compensation program for
not only himself, but for all employees wishing to participate through their own contributions;
and establishing a money purchase retirement plan or a 401 Qualified plan which provided the
opportunity for the City of Mound to contribute to a pension plan in lieu of the PERA program.
Since that time, the City of Mound has contributed to the 401 Qualified Plan and he has
contributed to the 457 or Deferred Compensation Plan.
Mound City Council Minutes
December 14, 1993
Recently, the City Manager was advised by the ICMA Retirement Corporation that because of
changes they are making in administering the 40i Qualified Plan, they are establishing an
administration fee of $500 which will now be charged to the employer. He stated that this fee
cannot be waived. Thus, he has been investigating alternatives and it appears that it makes
economic sense for him to not continue to participate in the 401 Qualified Plan, but rather roll
over the monies that are in his account into an individual retirement account (IRA). This also
benefits the city, because the City of Mound would have been responsible for paying the $500
administration fee on an annual basis.
Effective January 1, 1994, the city's contributions that have been going into the 401 Qualified
plan will be shifted to the 457 Deferred Compensation program of the ICMA Retirement
Corporation. He has been contributing to the 457 while the City has been contributing to the
401. With the changes he has described, the City will be making its contribution to the 457 plan
and will be paying FICA or Social Security tax on the contribution. However, the FICA tax is
considerably less than what the administration fee is if he were to continue in the 401 Qualified
plan.
Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//93-162 RESOLUTION TO TERMINATE THE 401
QUALIFIED PLAN ADMINISTERED BY THE
INTERNATIONAL CITY COUNTY MANAGEMENT
ASSOCIATION (ICMA) RETIREMENT
CORPORATION
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.15 pAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION nmde by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to authorize the payment of bills
as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $257,892.44, when funds are available.
A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFQRMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
B.
C.
D.
Department Head Monthly Reports for November 1993.
LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for November 1993.
LMCD Mailings.
Planning Commission Minutes of November 22, 1993.
Mound City Council Minutes
E.
F.
He
December 14, 1993
Letter from Representative, Tim Penny, RE: unfunded Mandates.
Notice from Hennepin County on a Public Hearing on an amended Hennepin County
Solid Waste Source Separation Ordinance (Ordinance #13). Public Hearing is scheduled
for December 14th at 11 A.M.
REMINDER' Annual Christmas Party, Friday, December 17, 1993, American Legion,
Mound.
REMINDER' City Offices will be closed the afternoon of December 23 and all day
December 24 for the Christmas holiday. Offices will also be closed the afternoon of
December 31 and all day December 30 for the New Year's holiday.
REMINDER' No Committee of the Whole Meeting on December 21 and no Regular
Meeting on December 28, 1993.
Notice RE: National League of Cities (NLC) Annual Congressional City Conference
scheduled for March 12-15, 1994, Washington, D.C. If you are interested in attending,
please let Fran know.
Park & Open Space Commission Minutes of December 2, 1993.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to adjourn at 9:15 P.M. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
December 22, 1993
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL EM'ERG~CY CLOSED MEETING
- DECEMBER 22, 1993
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met for a Special Emergency Closed
Meeting on Wednesday, December 22, 1993, at 6:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers at 5341
Maywood Road, in said City. The newspapers (The Laker, The Westonka Sun/Sailor, and the
Wayzata Weekly) were notified and the meeting was posted.
Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis
Jessen and Ken Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk
Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson, and Attorney Allen Barnard.
The Mayor opened the meeting.
The City Attorney explained that this meeting was called to discuss the Dakota Rail litigation
in Executive Session.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to go into Executive Session at 6:09
P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The City Council came out of Executive Session and reconvened the meeting at 6:57 P.M.
The City Attorney advised that Judge Rosenbaum:
1. Granted a motion for Summary Judgement by Dakota Rail;
2. Denied the City's motion for Summary Judgement by the City of Mound;
3. Denied the City's motion to have the Condemnation award limited to the contract
price;
4. Denied the City's motion to have the condemnation appeal declared moot;
5. Dismissed on the merits with prejudice the City's breach of contract
counterclaim; and
6. Declared the trial on the Condemnation Appeal to proceed as scheduled on the
January 1994 trial block.
The City's attorney, Allen Barnard (Best & Flanagan), advised the Council to appeal Judge
Rosenbaum's decision.
December 22, 1993
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to authorize Best & Flanagan (Allen
Barnard) to appeal Judge Rosenbaum's December 16, 1993, decision and stay the
Condemnation Trial until after the appeal has been heard by the Court of Appeals.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
SUBORDINATION OF REPAYMENT AGREEMENT (HUD)
The City Manager explained that is pertains to a CDBG housing rehabilitation loan for Mrs.
Elvera Erickson. Ms. Erickson is refinancing her mortgage and the lender requires that the City
subordinate its lien in favor of their mortgage. CDBG states there is sufficient equity in the
property to ensure that the City's interest is protected.
Ahrens moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION//93-163
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FOR PID//14-117-24
41 0029, LOT 56, MOUND ADDITION (ELVERA
ERICKSON)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at 7:07 P.M. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
Memorandum
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 10, 1994 Planning Commission Meeting
Planning Commission
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Case b'93-058, James and Katherine Veit, 2563 Lost Lake Road, Lot 18,
Block 1, Lost Lake, REQUEST FOR EASEMENT VACATION
The attached letter dated December 30, 1993 details staff's position regarding the
drainage easement vacation request. We have indicated to the applicant that additional
information could be provided and none has been received to-date. Staff's
recommendation remains unchanged based on the original application.
JS:pj
Enclosure
printed on rec~'cled paper
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOGD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 553r~4 '687
,612; 472 0600
FAX t6'~2,472 0620
December 30, 1993
James and Katherine Veit
4379 Wilshire Blvd C305
Mound, MN 55364
RE: Vacation Request at 2563 Lost Lake Road
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Veit:
I have reviewed your request again with city Staff and it is
still our opinion, including the City Attorney, that vacation of
the easement as you have proposed is not acceptable to Staff. At
the Planning Commission meeting, the request for additional
additional information was brought up that would shed some light on
your request and this could impact staff's recommendation.
Specifically, information regarding the balance of the easement on
lot 17 and the area to the west that is City owned. This
information is your responsibility to provide.
The City engineer may speculate on the needs of the City's
stormwater management. However, this is difficult to do because
our plan is conceptual at this point, and our opinions are
naturally reserved.
If you decide to provide the additional information, staff
will do their best to review it prior to the Planning Commission
meeting on January 10, 1994 and the City Council meeting on January
llth. Your surveyor may contact me at 472-0600, or the City
Engineer at 476-6010, directly if they have any questions.
~spe~' ' ~"~
~ ~ut~er ia .nd-
Building Official
CC:
Ed Shukle, city Manager
John Cameron, city Engineer
Curt Pearson, City Attorney
JS: ls
18
printed on recycled paper
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 13, 1993
~ JAMES & CA?HERIHB VEIT, 2563 LOST LAKB ROAD, LOT 18~
~JLOCK 1, LOflT LAKI~f PXD J~24-1117-24 2~ 0032. EASEMENT V'ACATIO~
(PUBLTC HRARTNG).
Jon Sutherland, Building official, reviewed the city Engineer's
recommendation for vacation of a portion of the drainage easement
over the subject property, as follows:
"This easement was created for construction of a
sedimentation pond when the property was platted. The
pond actually constructed did not cover the entire area
described by the easement. Therefore, the portion
requested to be vacated appears to be unnecessary as a
drainage easement; however, our concern is that will be
required of the city in the future regarding storm water
management. It's possible this pond may need to be
enlarged, in which case some or all of the easement may
be required."
The Public Works and Parks Department also recommended denial of
the vacation as requested.
The Commission clarified with the applicant why they are requesting
this vacation. It was explained that the applicant would like to
construct a driveway on the easement in order to access a garage,
the garage they propose would have both an upper and lower level
with one being accessed from the front and the other from the side
which is why they would need the driveway over the subject
easement. It was clarified that the paved driveway is proposed to
abut the walkway easement.
Jensen received confirmation from the Building official that the
house can be constructed right up to the easement. Jensen further
commented that Storm water Management is a big issue and that the
Planning Commission should be sensitive to this issue.
chair Meyer opened the public hearing.
Vern Veit, original developer of the Lost Lake Subdivision, spoke
on behalf of the applicants, and explained that the portion of the
easement requested to be vacated is only a small portion of the
entire easement which continues north into Lot 17.
Mr. reit shared some figures computed by Mark Gronberg, surveyor,
regarding the amount of water storage that is needed in this area
based on the 100 year flood. He stated that the easement is
grossly oversized and the reason the easement line was drawn there
is because it was a survey line. He further explained that the
elevations of the easement proposed to be vacated are higher than
the balance of the easement and the area is too high to use as a
drainage area. The elevation of the easement south of the walkway
is 936. He also noted that the City of Mound owns a large portion
of land to the west where the elevation ranges between 929.4 and
931.5. The elevations within this portion of the easement are
above the street and runoff would have to be pumped into this area
if it were to be used for drainage.
Jensen questioned the lot area of Lot 18; it was unknown. Hanus
questioned the availability of a survey for the lot to the north,
Sutherland confirmed that one should be on file.
/9
pl&nn£ng Comm£ss£on H£nukes Decembeg 13, 1993
Vern Veit commented that the City of Mound already owns an abundant
amount of land to the west which would accommodate drainage
requirements. It was noted that no drainage comes in from Bartlett
Blvd. as Lost Lake Road was raised so water will not flow into this
development.
Dave Olson of 2582 Lost Lake Road suggested that if the easement is
allowed to be vacated that the walkway, which he uses to access
Lost Lake Park and his dock site, be moved to the north so they are
not affected by the proximity of the proposed driveway.
Staff's rationale for it's recommendation was discussed and it was
noted that the City is in favor of retaining the drainage easement
due to impending storm water management regulations.
chair Meyer suspended the public hearing.
The Commission further discussed the issue. Hanus commented that
he is in favor of retaining easements in this area, however, he is
not convinced that the entire area is needed and he would like to
see staff or the applicant further research to provide more
elevations, including the lot to the north, and the property to the
west. Meyer agreed, if there is ample room to double or triple the
size of the pond towards the north, he may consider approval of the
vacation.
The applicant expressed a concern about having a pond adjacent to
her basement.
ross commented that maybe it would be beneficial for the applicant
to get organized and work with the City on potential storm water
management needs, and allow the city Engineer more time to collect
information. Johnson agreed that it would be beneficial for the
city Engineer to review the elevations of the balance of the
easement and reassess his recommendation.
MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Hanus, to table
thio request until the January 10, 1994 Planning
Commission #eating; and still have the city Council hold
their public hearing on ~anuar~ Il; 1994. More
information is to be supplied relating to Lot 17, the
parcel to tho north, tho land availability to the west,
and speculations by tho City on anticipations of the
Storm water Management Plan. Motion carried $ to 3.
Those in favor wero~ Meyer, Clapsaddle, Muellor,
Johnson; Voss, and Hanus. Michael; Jansen, and Woiland
opposed.
weiland commented that he feels adequate information was submitted
and a vote should have been taken. Jansen commented that we have
an existing easement and once it is gone you cannot get it back.
Michael feels that Cameron saw enough information to base his
decision and he agrees with it. Weiland agreed with both Jensen
and Michael.
Hanus commented that he is not convinced that the City Engineer's
recommendation was based on consideration of the entire easement,
he does not believe that it is possible that the entire easement,
both lots, could potentially be used for a pond, he does not
believe that size of a lake would be put in that neighborhood.
The City Planner suggested that Mr. Veit share the drainage
calculations by his surveyor with the City Engineer.
MINUTES OF A MF ETING OF THF.
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMI qSION
JANUARY 10, 1994
CASE ~93-058: JAMES & CATHERINE VEITf 2563 LOST LAKE ROI%Df LOT 18~
BLOCK 1~ LOST LAKB~ PID ~24-1117-24 22 0032. EASEMENT VACATION.
This request was tabled at the December 13, 1993 Planning
Commission meeting to allow time for gathering information relating
to Lot 17, the parcel to the north, the land availability to the
west, and speculations by the City on anticipations of the Storm
Water Management Plan.
Building official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed a letter which he
mailed ~o the applicant on December 30, 1993 that requested
additional information regarding the balance of the easement on lot
17 and the area to the west that is City owned. Sutherland noted
that staff has not received any additional information to-date.
Vern Veit, original developer of the Lost Lake Subdivision and
representing the applicant, submitted to the Planning Commission a
packet of information including: "Reasons for needing partial
vacation of draining easement," drainage calculations, and a copy
of State Statue 505.02 with the following highlighted "The purpose of
any easement shown on the plat must be clearly stated, and shall be confined to
only those that deal with public utilities, and such drainage easements as deemed
necessary for the orderly development of the land encompassed within the plat."
Mr. reit also displayed a drawing on tagboard consisting of the
surveys for lots 17, 18, and 19. Mr. Veit proceeded to expound on
the reasons for needing the vacation, as follows:
Easement area designated is grossly oversized for its need and
use.
The land planners (Coffin & Gronberg) did a poor job designing
this lot.
If vacation is not granted, a 9 foot high retaining wall would
be required to allow for the driveway which would not be
aesthetically pleasing. If a terraced wall is installed, it
would need to encroach into the easement, or require partial
vacation of the easement (approximately 12 feet). A terraced
retaining wall would continue the continuity of this
development.
It was noted that the drainage calculations have not been submitted
to the City for staff review prior to the meeting. Mr. Veit stated
that the City Engineer did have the opportunity to review them.
The Planning Commission discussed that this is a good example of a
house not designed for the lot. Clapsaddle commented that he
wanted to hear the City Engineer's comments on the applicants
information.
Plann£ng Commission Minutes
January 10, 1993
Easement Vacation
Case $93-058
Page 2
Hanus commented that it appears impractical to expand the pond to
either the north or the south, and the logical direction for
expansion would be to the west. He discussed this issue with John
Cameron earlier in the day, and he indicated that the applicant's
needed to provide documentation that the easement is not needed.
Michael reiterated that the required information was not submitted
by the applicant in time to be reviewed by the City Engineer. It
was noted that there may have been a lack of communication between
staff and the applicant's as they were unclear as to what
information was to be provided. Sutherland noted in his letter
that the applicant's surveyor was to contact either himself or the
City Engineer to clarify the needed information; and this was never
done.
Veit stated that the City Engineer has all the same information
that they presented this evening. The Building Official noted that
this information does not reflect the current conditions of the
site as the pond was not installed as it was intended.
MOTION made by Hanus to recommend approval of the
vacation of the easement up to the southern edge of the
walkway easement, provided the applicants reverse the
City Engineer's opinion, and it is recommended the City
Council table this issue at their meeting on January 11,
1994 until the applicant can discuss with the City
Engineer what information is required, due to an obvious
communication breakdown. When the information is
available the case should be referred back to the
Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Michael.
The Commission discussed the fact that the Council has a scheduled
public hearing for this case tomorrow, and how does this affect the
motion.
MOTION withdrawn by Hanus and Michael.
MOTION made by Hanus to table the request for an easement
vacation until the applicant can provide further
information supporting their claims. Clapsaddle seconded
the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
The Planning Commission requested their message be forwarded to the
City Council at their meeting on January 11, 1994.
CITY of MOUND
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
{6~2} ,:72 06%1
FAX 6~2 472
CASE NO. 93-058
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
THE VACATION OF A DRAINAGE EASEME~
LOCATED AT 2.~3 LOST LAKE ROAD, LOT 18, BLOCK 1, LOST LAKE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will
meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, January 11, 1994 to
consider a request to vacate a drainage easement at 2563 Lost Lake Road, Lot 18, Block 1, Lost Lake.
The legal description of the easement to be vacated is as follows:
That part of the drainage easement dedicated to the public in Lot 18, Block 1, Lost Lake,
which lies southwesterly of the following described line and its extensions: Commencing
at the most northerly line of said Lot 18; thence an assumed bearing of South 19 degrees
West along the westerly line of said LOt 18 a distance of 39.64 feet to an angle point in
said westerly line; thence South 41 degrees West along said westerly line a distance of
4.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 69 degrees
45 minutes East to the East line of said LOt 18, and said line there ending.
All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity
to be heard at this meeting.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Mailed to property owners within 350' by December 29, 1993, publish in 'The Laker' on December 27, 1993 and January 3,
199/4, and posted by December 29, 1993.
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue No":." Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Telephone
612/476-6010
612/476-8532 FAX
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Mr. Jon Sutherland
Planning and Zoning
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
December 9, 1993
REP, EIVED
DEC '; 0 1993
~.'I0[iNB P~ANNiN6 & iN,SP.
SUBJECT:
City of Mound, Minnesota
Easement Vacation Request
Lot 18, Block 1, Lost Lake
Case #93-058
MFRA #8902
Dear Jon:
As requested, we have reviewed the above request to vacate a
portion of an existing drainage easement over the subject property and
have the following comments and recommendations:
This easement was created for construction of a sedimentation
pond when the property was platted. The pond actually
constructed did not cover the entire area described by the
easement. Therefore, the portion requested to be vacated
appears to be unnecessary as a drainage easement; however, our
concern is what will be required of the City in the future
regarding stormwater management. It's possible this pond may
need to be enlarged, in which case some or all of the easement
may be required.
We have discussed this with both Public Works and the Parks
Department and our consensus is to recommend denial of the vacation
request.
Sincerely,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:jmk
cc: Greg Skinner
Jim Fackler
An Equal Oppodundy Employer
Certificate of Sur~ey for
James & Cathy Veit
of Lot 18, Block 1, LOST LAKE
Hennepin County. Minnesota
/
'~&7.99
LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~ OF PREMISES:
Lot 18. Block I, LOST LAKE.
This survey intends to show the boundaries
of tho above described property, and the
proposed location of a proposed house. It
does not purport to show any other improve-
ments or encroachments.
I hereby ceeb/that this survey was prepared by me or under my direc! super-
vision, and that I am a duly ~g~stered Civil £ngineer ancl Land Surveyor under
the Laws of the S~ate of Minnesota.
~ Sm Gronberg Minnesota license Number
~oe.o. 95-495
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC.
Oenotes ~u.~face l~'a~nqe
Oenotes Proposed E~evat~on
Denotes Existta~ Ble~atioa
INVOICE NO. 18476
F... NO. 310-~l
SCALE I' 20'
0- DENOTES IRON
Benchmark: To9 of Hydrant
~st of Lske~l
South of Bartlett
El. - 939.93
/
D
Area- I$,~95 Sq. Fro
Top of. Block
Garage l~oor
Lovest Nost Floor
Lot 17, B.l. ock 1, L,C~LM~
ClrtS¢lcltl Of Survey for
Jails I Cithy Yllt
Of Lot II. I]ock S, LOST
&la. tS,~S Sq. Pt.
,/
I
LEGAL OE$CSlPTION Of PR£NIS£S:
.LOt ~8. BlOCk t. LOST LAKE.
7
./
~ITY OF MOUND
,341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
472-0600, fax: 472-0620
c_ .o. q -05%
Date Yiledl "-Z4 q5
Application Fee: $150
Applicant's Name ~--~(,"AF~,,~-~ ~ CCx~3~p.~',v-,,~._ '~/ ~ ,~ Day Phone
LEG~ DESCRIPTION OF hPPLIC~T'S ~BUTTING PROPERTY: '~5~a ~ ~e
Lot
Add it ion
Description of Street or Easement to be Vacated:
Reason for Re.est or Interest in Pro~¢~ OA ~,
there a public need for the right-of-way to be retained for a public purpose?
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required
papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in
or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of
Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of postin9, maintaining and removing such notices as
may be required by law.
Applicant's Signature ~r~-~-~- ~/~ ~-~_~-~~ate //-,'~,_~1- ¢~.~
////////////H/Il////////////////////////////////////~~l/IH~~~~/~~/~~~~f/l/l//////~~~~~~/~~l/IH~~~/~~~~/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Recommendations from Utilities:
Recommendations from City Depts.:
Police Chief Other
NSP Minnegasco GTE
Public Works Fire Chief Engineer
COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC.
· ,UFIVEYINGo ENGIN~'I.~'I~ING AND LAND PLANNINO
4BI-A TAROCK AVENUE
LONG ~KE, MINN. 88~86
473-4141
Proposed easement vacation for
James & Cathy Veit
in Lot 18, Block 1, Lost Lake
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Description of part of drainage easement to be vacated
That part of the drainage easement dedicated to the public in Lot 18, Block 1,
LOST LAKE, which lies southwesterly of the following described line and its
extensions:
Commencing at the most northerly li~e of said Lot 18; thence an assumed
bearing of South 19 degrees West along the westerly line of said Lot 18 a
distance of 39.64 feet to an angle point in said westerly line; thence South
41 degrees West along said westerly line a distance of 4.00 feet to the
point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 69 degrees 45
minutes East to the East line of said Lot 15, and said line there ending.
SOUTHTOWN PLUMBING, INC.
~1963
6636 PENN AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554;:>3
612-866-3057
Minn 1784-1~
apls 297-M
St. Paul 12443-M
July 3, 1991
I £R'D JUL
5 1991
City of Mound
5341Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Attn: Ed Shukle, Jr.
City Manager
RE: Lost Lake Subdivision and Utility Easement
Ed,
Last fall after we met I created an easement on Lot 18 for a walkway.
It was filed and recorded last fall and a dated copy of it was sent
to you. We were unable to complete it last fall because of the weat-
her. I now have a confirmed date for blacktopping the walkway on the
afternoon of July 9th (weather permitting). Hopefully with this
walkway and utility easement completed you will be able to bring in
your equipment to mow the park.
Thank yo~,/~
/~//LaVern W. reit
Partner Jellico
cc:
Jim Fackler
John Cameron
Dave Willette
LWV/jjn
No delinquent taxes and ttlnsfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( } filed ( ) not required
Certificate of Real gstete Value No.
County Auditor
by.
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ 1.65
Date: /' ",';/' "" ,1990
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, =. Je I l ! co
(.reserved for recording data)
,a partnersht? under the hws of
Mt nn~nrn , Grantor, hereby eonveys and quitclaims to the Ctt.v o[ Hound
Henn~,ntn Cntmrv: HInno~orn ,Oran~e(I),
real property in 14,,n~-pi n County. Minnesota. de~cribecl as follows:
Uttttty and pubttc watkway easement over and across the southern ten (tO)
[eet of :he no. Cherty [orty-Etve (&5) [eet o[ Lo: Et§hteen, Stock One,
Lo~t l~ke, accordtn~ to the prat on £tte and of record tn :he o££tce o[
~he County Recorder, Henneptn County, H[nnesota.
The Cotat constderac£on [or this cransEer ts $500.00 or tess.
(if mo~,! ii, lOll it nl~. COntlno~ ~ b~)
toge[het ~it~ ~11 heteditament~ and appurtenances belon~r~ thereto.
Affix [)red Tax Staml, lief,.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN } ss.
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this
by ,_~rn Veit
the partner
of -J-cLLLco_
under the law~ of Hi
N~)T~ RIAL ~TAMP OR ~E~[. (OR O~'I~R ?~TLI~ OK RANK)
iNARSO, HIOtF].SCN & HARRIGAN, P.A.
~420 Edinborou~h Corporate Center East
,3300 Edinborough ',,{ay
'Hinneapoti R, Hin~esot:a
(612) 831-2323
55~35
Its
55364
The City of Hound
5361Haywood Rd
Hound, Htnneso~a
Jellico
6636 Penn Avenue Sou~h
Richfield, Hinncsota 55623
RESOLUTION NO. 88-!5
.. 18
January 26, 1988
RESOLIJTLON TO APPROVE THE LOCATIO# OF
SIX DOCK SITES ON LOST LAKE CIIANNEL,
CXTY OF HOUND PROPERTY
MHEREAS, the City of Hound owns property lying west of the Lost
Lake Subdivision and east of the main channel access to Lake Hinnetonka; and
WHEREAS, the six sites will be assigned location numbers as
follows:
55000
55040
55080 ·
A55120 - Abutting property, Lot 18
55160 .
A55200 - Abutting property, Lot 17
and will be listed on the 1988 dock location map; and
.WHEREAS, these above listed docks will be governed under the Hound
City Code, Section 437 - Dock Licenses; and
WHEREAS, Jellico, developer' of the Lost Lake Subdivision. agrees
to provide a walk/maintenance access to the docks from Lost Lake Road west
toward Lost Lake to the 931.5 foot flood elevation. This access is to be 10
feet wide with the length.d~termined by location of the 931.5 foot flood
elevation line, with a 4 foot wide Paved walkway surface to the 931.5 foot
flood elevation; and
WHEREAS, the Hound Parks Advisory Commission recommended approval
of these additional six (6) dock sites to.be listed on the 1988 Dock Site Hap
at their special meeting of December 15, 1987.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO that the City Council of the City
of Hound, Hinnesota, hereby approves the addition of the aforesaid six {6)
dock sites to the City of Hound dock system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Jellico agrees to dedicate a utility
and public walkway easement to the area proposed for docks. The easement will
consist of a 10 foot wide strip which will consist of a 4 foot wide strip of
asphalt with 3 feet of gravel on either side for walkway and maintenance
vehicle access to the dock site area to be installed by Jellico.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jessen and
seconded by Councilmember Johnson.
19
January 26, 1988
The following Councilmembers voted.in the affirmative:
Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Jensen.
Councilmember Abel was absent and excused.
)iaye'r
Attest: City Clerk
January 26, 1988
asphalt with 3 feet of gravel on either side for walkway and maintenance
vehicle access to the dock site area. He explained that 9 sites were measured
out, 30 feet apart, for the total 290 feet that is there.
Hargaret & Bob Nansen, 5425 Bartlett Blvd., spoke against approval of these
dock sites because of the environmental impact on the wetlands and con-
sequently Lake Minnetonka.
Tim King, 2'44'7 Lost Lake Road, spoke in favor of the dock sites because there
is already boat traffic in the channel and snowmobiles traffic in the marsh
area that does not appear to be harming it.
There was discussion on who would maintain the channel.
Councilmember Jessen suggested 6 dock sites instead of 9.
Councilmember Jensen stated She would still have to vote against this because
of her concern about motorized traffic in the Lost Lake area.
The City Attorney suggested that if this resolution is approved the following
be inserted, 'jellico agrees to dedicate a utility and public walkway easement
to the area proposed for docks. The .easement will consist of a 10 .foot wide
strip which will consist of a 4 foot wide strip of asphalt with 3 feet of
gravel on either side for walkway and maintenance vehicle access to the dock
site area to be installed by Jellico.' The Council agreed.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 188~ RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE LOCATION OF SIX DOCK
SITES ON LOST LAKE CHANNEL, CITY OF HOUND PROPERTY
The vote was 3 in favor with Counctlmember Jensen voting nay. Hotion carried.
The' City Hanager explained that the Park Advisory Commission was never or-
mally established in the Cit~ C~.,o~e.A,.._H~_,js_)~_gj~sting that an ordinance be
adopted cre~Qj~t,b(s~(~a~q~A~vis°ry C'°Fnm'~t'~s'~6n anU ¢~$h~g,,i~ties and
terms~...,~,~'~-'
ith moved and johnson seconded the following:
ORDINANCE 110-1988 AM ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 255 TO THE CITY CODE
CREATING A PARK ADVISORY COHHISSION AMD ESTAB-
LISHING ITS DUTIES
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
/
/
· Th
fl
t II
I0
$ 7
I
2
SCALE
o DENOTES I
BEARINGS
GORDON
ENGINEERS
LONG LAKE,
::'61
October 9, 1984
RESOLUTION NO. 8q-lTO
RESOLUTION TO CON'OR WITa THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF LOST LAKE
WHEREAS, the final plat of Lost Lake has been submitted
in the manner required for platting of land under the City of
Mound Ordinance Code, Section 22.00 and under Chapter q62 of the
Minnesota Statues and all proceedings have been duly conducted
thereunder; and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with
the City plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of
the State of Minnesota and Ordinances of the City of Mound; and
WHEREAS, the' City Engineer has suggested that some
changes be incorporated into this resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED by the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, that:
A. Plat approval request for the Lost Lake is approved
upon compliance with the following requirements:
1. As per final Plat "Exhibit A".
2. Per requirements set forth in Resolution 83-124,
or as subsequently amended by motion, approving
the preliminary plat of Lost Lake.
3. Escrow fund is to be established in the amount
of $3,600.
q. Pursuant to the City of Mound Resoluton No. 79-
501, the Park dedication and open space
requirements for the subdivision are satisfied.
5. Furnish the City with a performance bond in the
amount of $130,3qq. to cover 1255 of the
estimated cost o£ grading, watermain, streets,
sanitary sewer, etc.; all in eon£ormance with
the City plans and specifications before the
final plat is signed by the City at the sole
expence of the subdivider and in conformance
with Chapter 22 of the City Code; or if, in lieu
of the developer making improvements, the City
proceeds to install any or all of said
improvements, under the provisions of Chapter
420 of the Mlnnsota State Statutes, the above
mentioned corporate surety bond shall guarantee
262
October 9, 198q
payment in full by the developer of the cost of
sald improvements upon completion and assessment
of the improvement.
Driveway access to Lots 1 through 19 will be
provided from the newly platted Lost Lake Road.
Current validation of any State, County or local
permit approval such as Mlnnehaha Creek
Watershed, State Health Department, Hennepin
County Department of Transportation, enc.
Signing the Developer's Contract establishing
performance and requiring that the date of
completion of utilities and streets be set at a
date not later than the first anticipated date
of issuance of first Certificate of Occupancy.
If said Certificate is anticipated to be issued
during the winter months, construction must be
completed by November 30th. Said Development
Contract shall be Exhibit "B" and in no event
shall Development Contract exceed one year.
City Attorney's title opinion approval·
10.
All construction plans, Exhibit "Ca, shall meet
the requirements of the City Engineer and his
recommendation letter of September 11, 198q.
B. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a
certified copy of this resolution to the above named
Owners and Subdividers after completion of the
requirements of their use as required by M.$.A.
q62.358.
That the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby
authorized to execute the Certificate of Approval on
behalf of the City Council upon compliance with the
foregoing provisions.
This final plat shall be filed and recorded within
60 days of the signing of the hard shells by the
Mayor and City Manager in accordance with Section
22.00 of the City Code and shall be recorded within
180 days of the adoption date of this resolution
with one copy being filed with the City of Mound.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such execution of the
Certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Hanager shall be
conclusive showing of property compliance therewith by the
Subdivider and City Officials and shall entitle such plat to be
placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in
October 9, 198~
compliance with M.$.A. 462 and the Ordinances of the City,
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Charon and seconded by Councilmember Peterson,
The following Councilmember. s voted in the affirmative:
Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polston.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 83-124
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIHINARY PLAT OF
THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF LOST LAKE ADDITION-
PID #24-117-24 22 O018
WHEREAS, the plat of Lost Lake Addition has been submitted in
the manner required for platting under Section 22 of the City Code of the
City of Mound and under Section 462 of the Minnesota Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Mound has
reviewed said plat and found it to be consistent with the City plan and
ordinances of the City of Mound.
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the prelim|nary plat approval
request application as described in Exhibit "A", Case No. 83-229, contingent
upon compliance with the following requirements:
The filing of a revised plat indicating surface water drainage
patterns and proposed street grades. Also before final plat
approval by the City Council, the petitioner shall submit to
the City Engineer for approval, constructions plans which will
include grading, drainage, streets and utilities. Development
Contract to be executed and approved by the City Engineer.
e
Submission to the City Building Officlal of a letter from the
Hennepin County Highway Department documenting the approval
of the proposed road access on County Road 125.
Submission to.the City Building Official of results of soll
boring tests conducted on the site.
4. Submission to the City Building Official of evidence of approval
by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for the proposed
surface water drainage plan and systems.
5. Furnishing a duly completed and executed performance bond,
certified by the City Attorney as valid and enforceable, 125~
of estimated cost, $75,375.00, to cover:
· '(a) installation of grading, gravel and base for streets;
· (b) paving of streets;
(c) installation of concrete curb and gutters;
(d) installation of water systems;
(e) installation of sanitary sewer systems;
(f) installation of storm sewer systems;
ali in conformance with City approved plans and specifications
at the sole expense of the subdivider inconformance with
Chapter 22.00 of the City Code.
The provision of a ten (IO) foot utility and drainage easement
along the front, sides or corner lots, rear of all lots, and
ten (10) feet equally divided between each lot on interior side
lot llnes.
July
7. Before building permits for any homes to be constructed in
said subdivision are issued, a certificate signed by a
registered engineer must be provided. This certificate will
state that all final lot and buildlng grades are in conformance
tO the drainage development.plan and minimum floor elevation
plans approved by the City Engineer as per development contract.
8. Pursuant to City of Hound Resolution ~, the park dedication
and open space requirements for the subdivision are satisfied.
Approval of Title by the City Attorney.
Failure on the part of the petitioner to submit a final plat
within one (I) year from the date of this approval shall deem
the preliminary approval to be null and void (Section 22.13).
II.
Submission to the Building Officlal of evidence of approval by
Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Health for
sanitary sewer and watermain.
12. Submit street name for proposed plat, as well as signage and
street lighting.
An escrow fund of $2,?O0.O0 (minus Filing fees, approximately
$298.00) be established to. cover City engineering, legal and
administrative expenses.
I~. Divide Outlot A between adjoining properties with necessary
drainage and utility easements, where required.
15. Removal of all dead and diseased trees on the property.
The foregoing resolutlon was moved by Councilmember Paulsen and
seconded by Councilmember Peterson.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polston.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
None.
Attest: City Clerk ...
ADDITION
./
R£SOLUilON ~2-1
~XMIBIT "A'!
!
.,
; : : i
4 '
':/
· t
%%
'* I ' "'*
..
~ .\'~ · .. ,.., .,..,..:.:
-- .-. ...... ..- ...... .? i ~
· ' '..~. 'F
. .~."*, ,.~:
GENERAL ZONLNG INFORAIATION SItF. ET
Survey on file? yes~ no__ Date of survey~._4.~l~U~U. T~ot of Record? yes
Required Lot Width J~~ (frontage on an l~proved l~blLc atrNt)
Existing ~t WidthS, De~th~
8~TBACXH R~XRED:
LA~E S HOR~:
$0' /meamured ~rom q,H,W.)
FRONT
FRONT
SIO~:
SIDE:
REAR:
LJU(.SSHORE
EXISTING XHD/OR PROPOSED
FRONT; N S E # _
SIDE: N S #
SIDE; X # ~
ACCESSORY BUILDING
FRONT
FRONT
SIDE:
SIDE:
PEAR:
LAKESHORE
4' 9[ §'
4'
4'
50' [measured from O.N.W.)
ACCESSORY BUILDING
DA
(~)
J ~
/:". 46:
..:
~ ([6) -
(33)
LOT 4
(
O
C7
o
¥/
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING THE FOLLOWING PERSONS:
MARK HANUS & BILL VOSS TO
THE PLANNING COMMISSION;
AND MARK BREWER & JERRY LONGPRE
TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -
3 YEAR TERMS - EXPIRING 12/31/96
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
does hereby reappoint the following persons to the following commissions for 3 year terms
expiring 12/31/96:
Planning Commission - Mark Hanus & Bill Voss
Economic Development Commission - Mark Brewer & Jerry Longpre
January 11, 1994
RESOLUTION//94-
RESOLUTION APPOINTING
LIZ JENSEN ACTING MAYOR FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
does hereby appoint Liz ~Iensen Acting Mayor for the year 1994.
January 11, 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY CLERK,
FRAN CLARK, ACTING CITY MANAGER FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does
hereby appoint Francene C. Clark, City Clerk, as the Acting City Manager for the year 1994,
if the City Manager is disabled, incapacitated, away on city business or away on vacation. If
both the City Manager and the City Clerk are disabled, incapacitated, away on city business or
away on vacation then Len Harrell, Police Chief, is hereby appointed as Acting City Manager.
January 11, 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 9~
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LAKER
THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
docs hereby designate The Laker the official newspaper for the City of Mound for 1994.
The
Laker
2365 Commerce Blvd., Mound, MN 55364
472-1140
The
Pioneer
December 28, 1993
To: Mound City Council
Re: Appointment of Official Newspaper
Dear Councilmembers:
As you make your appointments for 1994, we ask that you consider re-appointing
The Laker as your city's official newspaper.
The Laker is published each Monday. The deadline for legal notices is 4:30 p.m.
the preceding Tuesday. Our rate for publication of legal notices is $6.16 per column
inch for the initial insertion, and $4.24 per column inch for each additional insertion.
The column width is 2 inches (12 picas).
We have enjoyed working with you in the past and we look forward to continuing to
do so. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Bill Holm
Associate Publisher
The Laker
January 12, 1993
RESOL~ON NO. 93-10
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A
$20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does
hereby authorize the purchase of at least a $20,000 bond for the City Clerk, Francene C.
Clark-Leisinger.
January 12, 1993
RESOLUTION NO. 93-9
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A
$20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY TREASURER/FINANCE DIRECTOR
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
does hereby authorize the purchase of at least a $20,000 bond for the City Treasurer/Finance
Director, Gino Businaro.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL
DEPOSITORIES FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does
hereby designate the following banks and financial institutions as official depositories for the
City of Mound in 1994:
Marquette Bank - Mound
First Bank
American National Bank of St. Paul
Marquette Bank - Minneapolis
Norwest
Dain Bosworth, Inc. ·
Shearson Lehman Hutton
Offerman & Co., Inc.
Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood
Prudential-Bache
Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund
Merrill Lynch
Paine Webber
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City's deposits shall be protected by
Federal Deposit Insurance and/or collateral in accordance with MSA Chapter 118.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Treasurer is hereby authorized to
open or continue an account or accounts with said institutions on such terms as required by said
institutions in the names of the City, and to deposit, or cause to be deposited in such account
or accounts, any monies, checks, drafts, orders, notes or other instruments for the payment of
money, upon compliance by said depository with this resolution and the law in such case
provided.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the designation shall continue in force until
December 31, 1994, or until written notice of its revision or modification has been received by
said institution.
January 11, 1994
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
RESOLUTION APPOINTING
TO THE PARK COMMISSION; TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION; AND
TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (EDC)
AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES FOR 1994
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
does hereby appoint the following Councilmembers as Council Representatives to the following
City Commissions for 1994.
to the Park Commission
to the Planning Commission
to the Economic Development Commission
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE ]LN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVEI~GE VARIANCE
TO ]Iff, LOW CONSTRUCTION OF ~ ADDITION AT
2385 COI~ERCE BLVD. (OUR L~DY OF THE LAKE CHURCH)
LOTS 6v ?v 8~ 9~ AND 10~ AUDITORS SUBDIVISION #167, AND
LOTS 1~ Zv AND 3~ GUILFORDS REARRANGEMENT OF MOUND BAY PARK~
PID #14-117-24 44 0005, P&Z CASE #93-059
WHEREAS, Our Lady of the Lake Church has applied for a
variance to impervious surface coverage to allow construction of a
one story parish activity center addition, and;
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the B-1 Central
Business Zoning District which allows churches as a permitted use,
and;
WHEREAS, the Shoreland Ordinance states that, "impervious
coverage in lots in the business and industrial zones shall not
exceed 30 percent of the lot area. In business and industrial
zones that are included within areas covered by an approved
stormwater management plan, impervious cover shall not exceed 75
percent of the total lot area." Therefore, when the City
eventually adopts a storm water management plan, the church, even
with the new expansion, will be well under the maximum threshold of
75% impervious cover, and;
WHEREAS,
follows:
impervious surface coverage calculations are as
existing
including addition
net increase
54.3%
~7.4%
3.1%
WHEREAS, the total amount of new hardcover is offset by
removal of an existing building and removal of an existing access
drive and parking area, and;
WHEREAS, positive features of the proposal include
replacement of driveway and parking lot drainage with roof top
drainage which is relatively cleaner run-off, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
The city does hereby grant an impervious surface coverage
variance of 27.4 percent to allow construction of a one story
parish activity center addition.
Proposed Resolution Page 2
Case ~93-059
Se
The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below,
pursuant to Section 350:420, Subdivision 8 of the Zoning
Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the
use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of
the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420.
It is determined that the one story parish activity center
addition (15,600 square feet) represents a reasonable use of
the property, and given tight site conditions, reasonable
efforts have been made to accommodate additional storm water
run-off by routing drainage by turf areas where possible.
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property:
Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, Auditors Subdivision
$167, and Lots 1, 2, and 3, Guilfords
Rearrangement of Mound Bay Park.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to
Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for
such recording. A building permit for the subject construc-
tion shall not be issued until proof of recording has been
filed with the City Clerk.
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 13, 1993
~. oF MOUND EA¥ PA~K, Pr~ ~4-Z~?-24 44 000S. LOt CO¥~aA~
YARIANCB FOR ADDI~ION~
City Planner, Mark Koegler, explained to the Planning Commission
that churches are permitted uses in the B-1 district and schools
are conditional uses in the B-1. The proposed activity center has
been interpreted by staff to be a "church" expansion, therefore a
conditional use permit is not required.
Shoreline provisions of the Mound Shoreland Ordinance states that,
"impervious coverage in lots in the business and industrial zones
shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. In business
Industrial zones that are included within areas covered by an
approved storm water management plan, impervious cover shall not
exceed 75 percent of the total lot area. At the present time,
Mound does not have a storm water management plan in place,
however, the City is currently having initial discussion on the
preparation of such a plan.
At present, impervious portions of the church site total 54.3%.
With the addition of the Activity Center, the amount of hard cover
will rise to 57.4%, a 3.1% increase.
Koegler noted that only roof drainage will be increased which is
considered relatively clean since it does not contain the oils,
salts and particulates that result from parking lot drainage.
Additionally, where possible, storm water is being drained over
grass areas prior to collection in the storm sewer system.
Staff recommended approval of the variance request which results in
a 3.1% increase in the total amount of impervious surface, subject
to the church obtaining required approvals and permits from
Hennepin County. The proposed church expansion represents a
reasonable use of the property, and given tight site conditions,
reasonable efforts have been made to accommodate additional storm
water.
When the City eventually adopts a storm water management plan, the
church, even with the new expansion, will be well under the maximum
threshold of 75% impervious cover.
Meyer questioned if the expansion will affect the already tight
parking problem. Koegler commented that the addition will not
warrant increased parking needs due to the times it will be
utilized.
Johnson commented that he has a concern due to the issues in the
previous case where the emphasis was to reduce the amount of runoff
into Lost Lake, and now this request, if approved, will increase
the runoff into Lost Lake. He also stated that Mound does not have
a Storm Water Management Plan, therefore, the 75% rule is not
applicable in this situation.
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Voss to recommend
approval of the variance to impervious surface to allow
for the church expansion as recommended by staff. Motion
carried 6 to 2. Those in favor were: Meyer, Weiland,
Jensen~ Voss, Hanus, and Michael. Clapsaddle and Johnson
opposed.
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on January 11, 1994.
Holslngton Koegler Group Inc.
mm
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: December 8, 1993
SUBJECT: Variance (Hardcover)
APPLICANT: Our Lady of The Lake Church
CASE NUMBER: 93-059
HKG FILE NUMBER: 93-10e
LOCATION: 2385 Commerce Boulevard
EXISTING ZONING: Central Business (B-l)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial
BACKGROUND/COMMENT: Our Lady of The Lake Church is proposing to construct an
Activity Center addition to the existing structure. The Center will contain a gymnasium, locker
rooms, meeting rooms, offices, a kitchen and storage space. The Mound Zoning Code allows
churches as permitted uses in the B-1 zone.
Our Lady of The Lake Church lies within the shoreland zone due to its direct access to Lake
Langdon and its proximity to Lake Minnetonka. As a result, it is subject to the provisions of
the Mound Shoreland Ordinance. The Shoreland Ordinance states that, "impervious coverage
in lots in the business and industrial zones shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. In
business and industrial zones that are included within areas covered by an approved storn~water
management plan, impervious cover shall not exceed 75 percent of the total lot area." At the
present time, Mound does not have a stormwater management plan in place, however, the City
is currently having initial discussions on the preparation of such a plan.
At the present time, impervious portions of the church s_ite total 54.3%. With the addition of
the Activity Center, the amount of hard cover will rise to 57.4%, a 3.1% increase. The tota~l
amount of new hardcover is offset by removal of an existing building and removal of an
~xisting access'' drive and parking between the existing church and school~. Portions of the
Land Use / Environmental · Planning / Design
7300 Metro Boulevard/Suite 525 ' Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 ' (612) 835-9960 · Fax: (612) 835-3160
Our Lady of the Lake Variance Request
December 8, 1993
Page 2
access drive and parking currently sheet drain directly into Lake Langdon. The new addition
will remove the paving in this area and replace it with rooftop drainage that will not contain
the oils, salts and other pollutants that result from driveway and parking lot drainage.
Drainage of the new roof area will be accommodated in three ways. A small portion of the-
roof around the elevator tower will be tied into the existing church roof or school roof drainage
systems. The gymnasium portion of the roof will drain to scuppers that will outlet into the
grass area between the new addition and the existing school. Water that does not soak into the
ground will be carried around the building by a swale and enter the gutters along Commerce
Boulevard. The remainder of the roof area will be tied into a drainage system that will be
piped into the County's storm drainage system. The County storm sewer crosses Commerce
and outlets into Lost Lake. All connections to the storm sewer system will require approvals
and permits from Hennepin County.
Due to tight site constraints, drainage options for the new addition are limited. Positiv..........~e
~f the plan include replacement of driveway and parking lot drainage with rooftop
dr__ainage. Although the amount of rooftop drainage is increased commehsurate with the
additional amount of roof area, this water is relatively clean since it does not contain the oils,
salts and particulates that result from parking lot drainage. Additionally, where possible, storm
water is being drained over grass areas prior to collection in the storm sewer system.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the variance request which results
in a 3.1% increase in the total amount of impervious surface, subject to the church obtaining
required approvals and permits from Hennepin County. The proposed church expansion
represents a reasonable use of the property and given tight site conditions, reasonable efforts
have been made to accommodate additional storm water.
When the City eventually adopts a stormwater management plan, the church, even with the
new expansion, will be well under the maximum threshold of 75% impervious cover.
Planning Commission Date:
City Council Date:
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
Distribution;
x,/' City Planner Public Works
~/ City Engineer V,/ DNR
Other
Application Fee:_ $50.00
Case NO. ~2'~ ~0 YDC~I
Please type or print the following information: .............................................
Address of ~u~ec[Prope~rty 2385 Commerce Boulevard, Mound, MN55364
bOtS b, 7, 8 and 9, Auditors Subdivison #167, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Guilfords
Lot Rearrangement of Mound Bay Park.
Block
Addition
PID No.
DisU'ict
Bi
Use of Property:
C-:rah Church
Our Lady of The Lake Catholic Church
Owner's Name
Day Phone
472-1284
Owner's Address 2385 Commerce Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364
Applicant's Name (if other than owner) ~//~
Address ~c,Q_.~C,..ff- /,,~.~-~q..fC)x.~ ~C4t
Day Phone
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other
procedure for this property? ( ) yes, f4 no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, rest
number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
o
Detailed descripton of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Addition to existing Church and $chool, one story building, approximately
15,600 square feet, to be used as a parish activity center.
Variance Application (11/93)
Page 2
Case No.
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zonio~
district in which it is located? YeslQj, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe tease
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS: required requested
(or existing)
VARIANCE
Front Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft.
Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft-
Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft' ft.
Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft-
· (NSEW) ft' ft. ft.
Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft.
Lot Size: sq ft sq ft sq ft
Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ft
Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes ID}, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography
( ) too small ( ) drainage
( ) too shallow ( ) shape
( ) soil
( ) existing situation
( ) other: specify
Please describe:
Variance Application (11/93)
Page 3
Case No.
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~ ff yes, explain:
Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (),
No~. ff yes, explain:
Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described
in this petition? Yes (), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
Not Applicable
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting,
maintaining and removing such notices as~ be requi~~~, y law.
~)wner's Signature ~/~
Applicant'sSignature x,,.~-~-~'~/~'~/~/j/~4~,
Date
Date
Attachment to Variance Application
Our Lady of The Lake
Hardcover
Total site cover
6.35 acres or
Existing site impervious surface area
Buildings 37,651 sq ft
Walks
Walls
~a~ing 112,718 sq ft
150,396 sq ft
276,606 sq ft
1Oo%
54.3%
Total impervious surface area after project improvments:
Existing 150,369 sq ft
Net add 8,492 sq ft
158,861 sq ft
57.4%
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CHURCH
MOUND, MN,
SCALE
OLL
Descrintion of Proposed Use
C)ne-story addition t.o existi, n~ church and school consi.~tinq of a
eymnaqium, two meetin~ rooms, two locker rooms, two public toilets,
office, stora~o rooms, kitchen, two community outreach rooms,
lobby, vestib~le and new elevator. The addition will prox'id*~
faci I it les ful fillin~ current needs of the church.
Effects of the Proposed Use
Tho propose(.] addit½on ~,'il] provide space for church and meet in~s:,
f,~nerals, social ~atherin~s, etc. The addition will be constructed
~cithin the exist, in~ l)roperty limits in the ~eneral area front
('ommerce Boulevard ~c},ere the existin~ convent structure is located.
The Convent will be removed from the site prior to commencement of
the construction.
The addition wi l] not materially affect the structures of the
exis~ in~ church buildin~ or school but will provide a direct
r-onnect, ion to bolt and will provide accessibility for ali throe
~cith the provision of a new elevator.
Ihe parkin~ req~irements will not be impacted as a result
Addition. The maximum site user load is ~enerated durin~ church
worship services and the church services with large at.t*~ndan
~chedules do not coincide with other activities of the ~chool or
the proposed activity center. General usage is indicated in tho
roi lo~in~ table.
SCIIEDULE TABLE OF NORblAL SITE USAGE
Activity
M-F
Main church mass worship services
8 A.bl. - 200-300 average attendance
9 A.~!. - 600-900
10 A.M. - 200-300
ll A.bt. - 200-300
Friday
Hours
Saturday Sunday
5:30-6:30 8-12
Mornin~ mass
Sunday School
M-F 8 A.M. 9 A.bl.
Pancake Breakfasts
(Second Sunday of Month after each mass)
9 A.M. - 30 +/-
10 A.M. - 200 +/-
11 A.M, - 30 +/-
12 A,M. - 30 +/-
9:30
10:15
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
School education hours
Staff
Students
M-F
7:30-4:30
8:00-3:00
Other meetings at school
Normal attendance 4-30
6:30-9:30 P.M.
1-2 hours
Reli~io,zs educntion
Grades 1-6
Wednesday
6:45-8:00 P.bl.
Prolmsed Activity Addition
Funerals (not held durin~ worship services or weddings)
Monday through Saturday
10:00-3:00 P.M.
Weddings
(btostly on Saturdays)
Fridays
5:00-7:00
Saturday Sundny
10:00-3:00 after mams
Based on past experience parking at the site has not been a prob]om
and it is not anticipated to be a problem after the activit 5'
addition is constructed. Parking data is indicated on the site
pi an.
site drainage will be impacted due to a slightly lar~er hard
.~urface (impermeable) area ag a result of the proposed addition.
The drainage patterns for most, of tile site will not be affecled.
Only the site area immediate to the building will be affected.
Proposed site drainage systems are described as follows. The
gymnasium roof will drain to the ground turf surface and excess
water not absorbed into the soils will surface drain to the
The new small roof area over the elevator and new main entrance
CanOpy will drain back on to the existing school roof and activil-y
roof respectively and will drain as will the remainder of the new
roof area internally directly into the existing storm sewer ss-stem.
Aspects relatin~ to noise, light, smoke/odor will probably not be
any different than existing conditions.
The site lighting plan indicates proposed lighting. The ma.iori(y
of the new exterior lipht, ing will be provided ~,'ith lighting mo,~nt, ed
directly from the building. All light sources will have lenses
controlling the light dispersion downward.
Vehicular traffic in~ress and e~ress to the site will occur at.
existing so,Itt and north site entrances. Through-traffic from the
site will be curtailed at the center site entrance located between
the existing ch,~rch and school. The driveway entrance at tho
center of the site will remain and will only serve a small four car
parkin~ lot and provide service access to the new kitchen. 'Fha,
proposed addition will draw a smaller traffic count than the
typical large church mass service and will not coincide with tile
main church service schedules. School activities do not qenerale
large ~raffic counts presently and the addition will not challqe
schoo]-relatod traffic from the current situation. Refer ~o the
,qchedule of Not'mai Site Usage fo~' activities that ~enerate e::istin~
trnffic. In ~eneral the traffic counts should be similar to the
existing conditions.
PROJECT TIME SCHEDULE
Project Desien Phase
Construction Phase
Winter 1993 - February 1994
Sprin~ 1994 - Fall 199~|
CHURCH '"' MOUND, {,,iN
PARISH ACTIVITY CENTER EXPANSION'
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CATHOLIC
CHt.fR(~H - - ~ -
\
C
OUR I.~D'f OF TI'IF.. ~ cA'n{oLIc
CHURCH · 140~JND~ MN
' O
s ~ i PARISH ACTIVITY CENTER EX, PAN$1OH
!1 OUR L^DY OF THE LAKE CATHOLIC
C
I
I I
I' 1I
I I
CHURCH
MOUND, MN
{~
PARISH ,AC'~VITY CENTER EXPANSION
OUR LAITY OF THE LAKE CATHOLIC
CHURCH ~, MOUND, MN
OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 13, 1993
CASE ~93-061: BOYER BUILDING CORPOI~TZON· 2820 TUXEDO BLVD.
OPEL/CAN PO*rlqT)· PHELPS TSLAI, ID P~IuRK 1BT DZVIBTONt PZD ~19-117-23 31
0067~ 0003. BKE~H p~ R~X~,
City Planner, Mark Koegler, briefly reviewed the intent of the
request for a Sketch Plan Review by Boyer Building Corporation to
develop the "Pelican Point" property. Koegler explained that this
request can be processed as a Planned Development Area (PDA).
Koegler recognized a letter received from the Department of Natural
Resources today regarding the proposed development.
Mr. John Blumentrit, Mr. Bob Boyer, and Mr. John Boyer, were
introduced to the Commission as being representatives for Boyer
Building Corporation. Visual aids were displayed. John Blumentrit
explained the proposed development which includes 40 residential
units, or 20 twin homes, with driveway access off a 20 foot wide
private road system.
Marketability of the proposed development was reviewed. The
development is being geared towards the over-fifty age group. The
units will have approximately 1,700 square feet on the main level.
The campus would be maintained by an association. They are aware
that they will need to address the boat docking issues. The
proposed hardcover is 22 to 25 percent, they are very interested in
preserving the natural site and keep as many trees as possible, a
north woods feel is proposed. An interior pond is proposed to help
with drainage.
It was clarified that there will be 20 feet between each twin home.
The proposed price range of the units is $300,000 to $500,000. The
Commission noted that an official path to the docks should be
established. The possibility of a beach was discussed. Development
on the island was discussed, and it was noted that they would like
to keep the island as pristine as possible.
The Commission was very receptive to the plan, and commented that
it is one of the best proposals they have seen for this area.
Mr. Boyer commented that it is their intent, prior to formal
application to the City for platting, to invite neighbors who
reside within 350 feet of the property to an informal meeting to
receive comments and concerns.
PHONE NO.
~I~D STATE OF
EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
METRO WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106
FILE NO.
772-7910
December 13, 1993
Mr. Jim Fackler
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RE:
PELICAN POINT P.U.D, LAKE MINNETONKA (27-133P), CITY OF
MOUND, HENNEPIN COUNTY
Dear Mr Fackler:
We have reviewed the concept plan (received December 1, 1993) for
Pelican Point P.U.D. (Section 23, Tll7N, R23W) and have the
following comments to offer:
The project area borders Lake Minnetonka (27-133P). Any
activity below the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation, which
alters the course, current or cross-section of Lake
Minnetonka, is under the jurisdiction of the DNR and may
require a DNR permit. The OHW for Lake Minnetonka is 929.4'
(NGVD, 1929). The placing of the docks at Pelican Point will
require a DNR Permit.
Lake Minnetonka (27-133P) has a shoreland classification of
general development. The shoreland district extends 1000 feet
from the OHW. Pelican Point P.U.D. must be consistent with
the City's shoreland management regulations. In particular
you should note:
ae
Bluffs (i.e. slopes that average 30 percent or greater
and rise 25 feet above the OHW) exist on the project
site. Large portions of the remainder of the site
contain steep slopes. The bluffs should not be disturbed
and all structures should be setback at least 30' from
the top of the bluff. Topographic alterations should be
minimized in the areas containing steep slopes.
be
The plans indicate that 40 mooring spaces are
planned for the docking facilities of this
development. This far exceeds the number of slips
allowed for a development with a shoreline of
approximately 1300'. DNR rules regarding private
marinas calculate allowable number of slips based
on the natural shoreline divided by the city's
minimum lot width (75' in this case), thus allowing
approximately 17 slips. In past discussions with
potential developers of this property, DNR staff
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
City of Mound
December 13, 1993
Page (2)
have indicated a willingness to consider using the Lake
Minnetonka Conservation Districts (LMCD) standards in
determining the-appropriate number of slips to be
authorized at this site. Based on the LMCD standards of
1 slip/50' of shoreline, 26 slips would be possible.
Further discussion on this issue would definitely be
necessary, if more than 17 slips are requested.
Ce
The density of 18 living units within the first tier of
the shoreland district exceeds the total number of units
allowed within this tier. The number of units should be
reduced by one to comply with shot·land rules.
de
The open spaces of this development should be clearly
identified on future plans of this project.
In the future, the developer must address other issues in
order to meet DNR shoreland management P.U.D. standards: an
association agreement with mandatory membership which protects
open spaces and the shore impact zone; deed restrictions which
address topographic and vegetative alterations, vehicle
storage, and construction of additional buildings; the
structures must meet the height requirements of the City
shoreland ordinance; the screening of the structures from view
on Lake Minnetonka; erosion control during construction; and,
the treatment of stormwater from the development.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact me at
772-7910 should you have any questions regarding these comments.
Sincerely, ,
Joe Richter
Hydrologist
cc:
Ellen Somes, Minnehaha Creek WSD
Lake Minnetonka (27-133P, #7) File
City of Mound Shoreland File
Holslngton Koegler Group Inc.
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: December 8, 1993
SUBJECT: Sketch Plan Review
APPLICANT: Boyer Building Corporation
CASE NUMBER: 93-~ C8o [
HKG FILE NUMBER: 93-10f
LOCATION: 2820 Tuxedo Boulevard (Pelican Point)
EXISTING ZONING: Single Family Residential (R-l)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND/COMMENT: Boyer Building Corporation has submitted a sketch plan for
development of the property commonly known as Pelican Point. Before providing an overview
of the plan, it may be helpful to review the purpose of a sketch plan. Both Mound's Zoning
and Subdivision Ordinances have provisions allowing for a sketch plan review as the first step
in a development project. The purpose of the sketch plan is to afford the applicant the
opportunity to solicit input from both the Planning Commission and City Council prior to
undertaking the effort and expense of assembling more detailed plans. Specifically, the
Subdivision Ordinance references that a sketch plan should "show that consideration has been
given to the relationship of the proposed subdivision to existing community facilities that
would serve it, to neighboring subdivisions and developments, and to the topography of the
site." In other words, sketch plans commonly review "big picture" items such as housing type,
density, roadway patterns, drainage patterns, etc.
Boyer's proposed development of the Pelican Point site involves construction of 40 residential
units. The units are constructed in a double configuration (common wall) with driveway access
off of a private road system that winds through the site. The roadway system creates a central
loop with two dead end stubs off of the south side, one serving a total of 6 units and the other
serving only two units. According to the plan, the proposed road width is approximately 20'.
Land Use / Environmental · Planning / Design
7300 Metro Boulevard / Suite 525 · Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 · (612) 835-9960 · Fax: (612) 835-3160
Boyer Building Corporation Sketch Plan
December 8, 1993
Page 2
In order to develop the parcel in the manner shown on the plan, the project would need to be
processed as a Planned Development Area (PDA) which allows attached housing styles and
varied design features. Approval of a Planned Development Area is by Conditional Use
Permit. The underlying zoning would remain in its present R-1 classification.
As was mentioned previously, the purpose of the Pelican Point Sketch Plan is to raise general
issues and allow for their initial discussion. The subject proposal creates a number of issues,
many of which will need to eventually be considered upon submission of much more detailed
information. At this time, however, it is suggested that the Planning Commission and City
Council focus their comments on the type of housing proposed as well as the overall
development pattern. The following comments are intended only to serve as a guide for such
discussions:
Housing Type - Under the provisions of the PDA, development proposals can include
a variety of housing types. Previous development proposals for the Pelican Point site
have contained single family, doubles and condominium structures. The Planning
Commission may want to offer an initial reaction on the type of housing proposed by
Boyer Building Corporation.
Density - In PDA's, the maximum allowable density of a project is derived from the
lot size requirements of the underlying zoning district. The underlying district (R-l)
has a lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet. Accordingly, the maximum allowable
density without a rezoning would allow approximately 64 units to be built on the site.
The proposed 40 units fall well under the maximum allowable units.
Roads/Circulation - The proposed street system within the development is a significant
departure from a traditional public street network. Most noteworthy is the fact that the
roads will be private and are of a narrower width than normal. In concept, is the
proposed street system acceptable to the City of Mound?
Vegetation/Topography - The Pelican Point site is heavily wooded. Is the development
pattern sensitive to the topography while maximizing retention of existing trees?
Shoreland Standards - Mound's lack of a Shoreland Management Ordinance was one
of the reasons a previous development plan for Pelican Point did not occur. Since that
time, the City has enacted shoreland provisions that will be applicable to this site.
When more detailed plans become available, the project will be analyzed utilizing the
shoreland standards. That review will include but not be limited to an assessment of
allowable density, shoreland setbacks and a review of impervious cover calculations.
Island Area - The current proposal does not show any active use of the island area of
Pelican Point.
Boyer Building Corporation Sketch Plan
December 8, 1993
Page 3
Boat Docks - The plan calls for a common docking area at a point which is midway
along the lakeshore. Docks fall under the jurisdiction of the LMCD, however, the City
can provide comments on a dock proposal of this size.
RECOMMENDATION: During the sketch Plan phase of a project, detailed staff
recommendations are not prepared since the information upon which they are based has yet to
be developed. The preceding list of topics is intended only to serve as a framework for a
preliminary discussion of Boyer Building Corporation's Sketch Plan. This list certainly does
not include all relative items and the Planning Commission and City Council are encouraged
to raise any issues they deem are appropriate. An honest, objective assessment of a project
at the sketch plan phase assists the developer in: 1) determining whether to further pursue the
project, and 2) in preparing more detailed plan information that responds to initial issues and
concerns that might be raised.
MNDBOYER. RPT
Boyer Building Corporation
November 29, 1993
PELICAN POINT
PROJECT SUMMARY & NARRATIVE
MOUND, MINNESOTA
PROJECT SUMMARY SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
PROJECT NAME
Pelican Point
TYPE OF PROJECT
Empty nester single family zero lot line housing
REQUESTED ACTION
Concept Planned Unit Development (PDA)
Southeasterly side of Tuxedo Boulevard between Lakewinds Development on the north
side and Dorchester Road on southerly side.
Ralph C. Tumquist
Elsie B. Tumquist
Rolf W. Tumquist
Trude Turnquist
Managing Agent
16061 Holdridge Rd. W.
Wayzata, MN 55391
(612) 440-9323
Boyer Building Corporation
18283A Minnetonka Blvd.
Deephaven, MN 55391
612) 475.2097
SITE ENGINEER, LAND~qCAPE ARCHITECt?
SURVEYOR & UTILITIES ENGINEER
To be selected
project S..u..mmary and Narrative
Pelican Point
Page 1
&,, ,,ail
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Island
Main Lot
Small Lot
(See Attached Description)
'7?
Page 2
Existing Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan:
Proposed Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
Residential Single Family
Residential, Low Density (1-4 D.U/AC)
PDA
Residential, Low Density (1-4 D.U/AC)
Approximately 16 acres of undeveloped land total with 14.76 acres attributed to mainland
and the balance as Pelican Island. The mainland site has approximately 1400 lineal feet of
shoreline.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT:
40 Zero lot line Twinhome residences
HOUSING/LAND USE PROFILE
Gross site area: 14.76 Acres 643,044 S.F. (island not included)
Gross wetland area: 0
Net buildable area: 14.76 Acres
Residences Proposed: 40
Gross Density: 2.71 D.U./AC
Net Density: 2.71 D.U./AC
Bituminous Street Sq. Footage: .
Total Residential Bituminous Sq. Footage:
Total Residential Sidewalk Sq. Footage:
Residential Unit Hardcover Sq. Footage: 1850 average each
Total Residential Hardeover: Approximately 25% of site
Total Residential Deck Area: Aproximately 10,000 total square feet
PARKING PROPOSED
Garage 80
Driveway 80
2 spaces/D.U.
2 spaces/D.U.
LAKESHORE DATA
Lakeshore Frontage: Approximately 1400 Lineal Feet
BOAT DOCKAGE
Proposed Dockage: One Association Dock with 28 Boats Areas and 10 Sailboat
Moorings
Page 3
1,, JI I,
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Pelican Point is a proposed 40 unit zero lot line Twinhome residential development
eon~tructM exclusively for "empty ne~terg". The dwellings are structured for one level
living and either walkout or lookout lower levels. Each residence will be wood frame
construction with two car attached garages.
CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FRAMEWORK/ZONING CLASSIFICATION
The site is currently recognized as residential Iow density (1-4 dwelling units/acre) under
the city comprehensive plan and also residential single family under the zoning ordinance.
EXISTING LAND USE
Vacant property.
PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SCHEDUI,E
Upon satisfactory review by the regulatory agencies and final approval by the City,
construction will begin in 1994. The developer currently retains a "waiting list" for
approximately 100 interested clients so the construction phasing will market driven on a
first come basis. We estimate a three year build out for the project.
Boyer Building Corporation is currently the land purchaser from Ralph Tumquist, Elsie
Turnquist and RolfTumquist.
Boyer Building Corporation was established as Joe Boyer Construction Co. in 1945 and
also did business as Joe Boyer and Sons until the incorporation of Boyer Building
Corporation in 1983. The company has been a member in good standing of the
Minneapolis Builders Association since 1959 and has won many awards including the
nationally recogniz~ "Award Of Honor" from the American Institute of Architects.
Boyer Building has been involved with a substantial number &the residences on and
around Lake Minnetonka serving both as land developer and home builder.
All necessary building financing will be secured by Boyer Building Corporation.
Page4 ~ J
The concept plan is generated to take advantages of the existing views while maintaining
the integrity of the existing ground elevation. Shaping of the site for pending run off
detention and final grading is anticipated.
Although the conceptual utility plan is yet to be completed, it is anticipated that the water
service and sanitary sewer to Pelican Point will be from the inplace watermain in Tuxedo
Boulevard.
The storm sewer system will be designed to a~ommodate a 5 year rainfall event within
the street and driveway system.
Bituminous paved streets will be as shown on the conceptual site plan. The private street
will have a mountable concrete curb and gutter and constructed to a 20' - 0" back to back
width.
ENTRY SIGNAGE
An entry monument/signage is anticipated upon entry to Pelican Point. The entry sign
general design including size, materials and lighting will decided by the development stage
of the PDA.
LEVEL I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
A Phase I environmental site assessment has not been prepared for the site. An existing
well and fuel tank may exist next to former residence. An assessment will be undertaken
and proper abandonment will be completed.
WATER AND WETLANDS
No wetlands exist on the site. The builder will construct a temporary runoff barrier to
protect the lake during the construction interim and until the landscaping is restored.
~ ~ Page S
]~ROJECT ARCH ITECTURE
The final project architecture is currently under review. The design will be modeled quite
similarly to Gideon Cove, a townhome development currently being completed by the
developer in Shorewood off County Road 19 on Timber Lane.
The proposed units will be one story high and also have basements. The main level will
have living, dining, kitchen, dinette, laundry, den, master bedroom suite and powder
room on the main level and family room, bedroom, bath, storage, hobby and mechanical
space on the lower level. All units will have an attached two car garage. Additionally all
units will have a large deck area with options for a three or four season porch. The main
floor finish area will be from 1400 to 1800 square feet and the entire unit will have
approximately 3000 finished square feet.
It is the developers intent to preserve or add to the existing perimeter planting for
landscape buffering. No landscape plan has been prepared but the developer has
established a $3,000.00 / unit allowance for landscaping.
No geotechnical evaluation has been undertaken for this project. These will be undertaken
prior to construction.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Ali Pelican Point buildings, driveways, streets and grounds will be held and maintained by
a homeowners association.
Based on criteria from the Institute of Traffic Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, the trips
generated from residential townhouse/condominium units, the average daily traffic equals
approximately 6 trips per residence. Based on 40 units, the total trips generated (two
ways) equals 240. The P.M. peak hour traffic equals approximately .0.55 trips per unit or
:2:2 total trips. Of that total, 67% of the trips are inbound (14.7 trips) and 33% of the trips
are outbound (7.3 trips).
Page6 ~,~
CRITICAL PUBLIC DECISIONS
The City of Mound has the predominant authority over the development and several
approvals by the regulatory agencies and the City Council are the major critical public
decisions to be made.
At the P.D.A. concept level approval process, the most significant issues are expected to
be:
1. Boat dockage quantity and layout.
2. 8horeland District ofLake Minnetonka regulations and laws.
3. Overall building density.
Page 7
(Rev£sed 12/8/92) ,I ~ 'i
Application for , .....-- .. :-
iPhd ~lt_~
c~t~ o~ ~ound
534~ ~a~ood Road~ Mound~ ~ 55364
~hon~: 472-0600~ Fax: 472-0620
Planning Commission Date:~_,. ~, Iq~.
City Council Date:
Site Visit Scheduled:
Zoning Sheet Completed:
Case No. qS-91, oe I
Sketch Plan Review: $150.00
Preliminary Plat: $150.00
Final Plat: $100.00
Escrow Deposit: $1,000.00
Deficient Unit Charges?
Copy to City Planner: I I-_~n ~"{'~ Delinquent Taxes?
Copy to Public Works: ~
Copy to Cit~E~n~eer:
Other: i i~l,~ VARIANCE REQUIRED?
Please type or print the following information:
Address of Subject Property '2..~>'2.~ '"'~~0 %[~t~.
Owner's Name Ralph C., Elsie B. , Rolf W. Turnquist Day Phone 440-q~2~
Owner's Address 16061 Holdridge Rd. W., Wayzata, MN
I
Nme of Surveyor: To be determined
Name of Engineer: TO be determined
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot See attached
Addition
PID No.
Day Phone
Day Phone
Block
Zoning District Use of Property:
PROPOSED PLAT NAME: Pelican Point
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other
zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application,
action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
This appliCator, on ~ust be signed by all owners of the
explanation ~$ven~h~y ~is is not the case.
of Owner /
Signature o~
subject property, or an
Da ~ ~/'~///~
Date
EXHIBIT B TO THAT CERTAIN PURCHASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN RALPH C. TURNQUIST, ET AL, AS SELLER, AND
BOYER BUILDING CORPORATION, AS BUYER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Island
Phelps Island Park, 1st Division Lot 73
That part lying Southeasterly of Channel.
Small Lot
Unplatted 19 117 23.
Commencing at the point of intersection of the northwesterly extension of the northeasterly
line of Lot 35 Phelps Island Park First Division with the northwesterly line of private alley adjacent
to said lot, thence southwesterly along said alley line to the westerly extension of the southwesterly
line of LOt 38 of said plat thence northwesterly 200 feet along said extended line, thence
northeasterly 200 feet to a point in said northwesterly extension of said northeasterly line of said
Lot 35 a distance of 266.8 feet along said extended line with the southeasterly line of Tuxedo Road,
thence northwesterly 266.80 feet along said road line thence southeasterly 286.8 feet parallel with
said northwesterly extension of said northeasterly line of said Lot 35 thence southwesterly 20 feet
parallel with said road line thence southeasterly to the point of beginning.
Main Portion
Phelps Island Park 1st Division.
Lots 19 to 34 inclusive also including adjacent private street and private alley and that part
of Lot 73 lying northwesterly of channel also commencing at the intersection of the northeasterly
line of Lot 19 extended with westerly line of private alley adjacent to said Lot 19, thence southerly
along westerly line of said private alley to its intersection with the northwesterly extension of the
southwesterly line of LOt 34, thence northwesterly along said extension of the southwesterly line of
said Lot 34 to a point distant 286.8 feet southeasterly from the point of intersection of said line
with the southeasterly line of Tuxedo Road thence northeasterly 20 feet parallel with said road line
thence northwesterly 286.8 feet parallel with the northwesterly extension of the southwesterly line
of said Lot 34 to the southeasterly line of said road thence northeasterly along said road line to the
northeasterly line of said LOt 19 extended thence southeasterly 299.1 feet to the point of beginning.
NV'kl
Zl I -
LOt !
( ~7'. ;47)
(~SO)
,o 4o 4;3 ~o 4~'14o
.............. ~'~o~
(:57) /
4;) 40 ~0 I 4~} -_/
(2)
;)
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.
LOCATION:
ZONING:
Planning Commission Agenda of January 10, 1994
Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
Jon Sutherland, Building Official -
Variance Request
Don & Terfi Bonnicksen
94-02
2156 Centerview Lane, Lots 8 & 31, Block 7, Abraham Lincoln Addition to
Lakeside Park, 13-117-24 31 0052
R-lA Single Family Residential
BACKGROUND
The applicant is seeking a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming front yard
setback of 17.5 feet in order to accomplish the following:
1. Remove existing front entry roof and nonconforming shed.
2. Add 2 feet to existing rear porch that is currently being converted into a laundry
room.
3. Construct a fully conforming 24' x 34' detached garage.
4. Construct a 12' x 14' fully conforming rear deck.
5. Construct a future second story addition (note sketch plans), this addition steps
back from the footprint of the existing dwelling setbacks and is also conforming.
Staff Report
2156 Centerview Lane
January 10, 1994
Page 2
The front yard setback would actually be improved by the removal of the front entry roof
(this roof is not shown on the survey), and the construction of the decorative 2 foot entry
gable.
Comments
It is unlikely the front setback would be improved other than this proposal as the
structure appears to be in sound condition. Due to the oncoming winter weather and
time constraints of the variance process, the applicant has, at his own risk, installed the
garage slab. It was inspected for proper setbacks and construction prior to pouring.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval as this project
represents a substantial improvement to the property~ improvement of the existing front
yard encroachment, and the proposal is conforming to the Zoning Ordinance, upon the
condition that the nonconforming shed and existing front entry roof be removed.
The abutting neighbors have been notified of this request. This case will be heard by the City Council on
January 11, 1994.
JS:pj
-
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
Planning Commission Date:
City Council Date:
Application Fee: $50.00
'.~. City Planner ~- Public Works
City Engineer ~ DNR
Other
Please type or print the following information:
Address of Subject Property ~ I .~
Addition ,~ ~ L: ~C_ ~
Block
PID No.
District
Owner's Name
Owner's Address
Use of Property:
- ( 6~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~,'ci- ~,.r,,, Day Phone
,~ .~__.~
Applicant's Name (if other than owneO
Address .~,/ac o--./,- ~ Day Phone
1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning
procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution
number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
Detailed descripton of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Variance Application (11/93)
Page 2
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes (x)~' No ~5If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reaso~
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS:
Front Yard:
Side Yard:
Side Yard:
Rear Yard:
Lakeside:
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
(NSEW)
: (NSEW)
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover:
required requested VARIANCE
(or existing)
~__ C_~ ft. I'X . ~ ft. '7_-' -7 ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
sqft sqft sqft
Does the pre~. use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located7 Yes~--O, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use:
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow
( ) too small
( ) too shallow
( ) topography
( ) drainage
( ) shape
( )soil
(A~Fexisting situation
( ) other: specify
Please describe:
i Il
Variance Application (11/93)
Page 3
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~. If yes, explain:
Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
No~2~-If yes, explain:
Yes (),
Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described
in this petition? Yes (), No b~C. ff no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
e
Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting,
maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law.
,wner's Signature
Applicant's S~gnature
Date
Date
NAME:
ADDRESS:
CITY OF MOUND
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
EXISTING LOT AREA
EXISTING LOT AREA
SQ FT X 30% =
SQ FT X 15% =
HOUSE:
GARAGE:
DRIVEWAY:
DECK:
(if impervious
surface under
deck = 100%)
OTHER:
LENGTH WIDTH
TOTAL HOUSE *******************
TOTAL GARAGE ******************
TOTAL DRIVEWAY
TOTAL DECK *************
TOTAL DECK @ 50%***************
¥',~ x =
~ (-~,, x =
TOTAL OTHER *******************
TOTAL PROPOSEDHARDCOVER *******************
DATE:
5341 MAYWOOQ ROAD
CITY of MOUND
(6~2~ 472-0600
FAX (6~2~ 472 0620
January 11, 1994
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
GREG SKINNER, UTILITY SU~ERINTENDENT6~
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER ~
WATER METER READING EQUIPMENT
As you know we recently went out for bids on a water meter
reading system to upgrade significantly the method by which we read
the city's water meters. We advertised for bids on a system that
would electronically receive and input data utilizing the City of
Mound's utility billing system. We also specified that the system
must be capable of being upgraded to a radio read and/or phone read
system. Further, the system is to be a turn-key operation
consisting of: meters, remotes, data collection devices and
software and installation services.
The bids were opened on January 5, 1994. Two companies bid on
this type of system. They are Northern Water Works Supply of
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota and Water Pro of Eden Prairie, Minnesota.
The following are the bids by each company specified by meters,
data collection devices and software and installation/training:
Northern Water Works
Meters Data Collection
Devices & Software
$209,440 $10,750
Installation/
Training
$118,240/
included
Grand Total
$338,430
Water Pro
Meters
Data Collection
Devices & Software
$214,400 $13,200
Installation/
Training
$112,000/
included
Grand Total
$339,600
printed on recycled paper
Page 2
Please note that Northern Water Works is the low bidder at
$338,430 or $1,170 less than Water Pro.
Since the bids were opened on January 5th, city staff has been
analyzing each of the bids to make sure that they met
specifications. Because the bids were very close in price, we
wanted to make sure that both bidders bid the same type of
equipment so we could compare apples to apples. Since the bid
opening, both companies have been more than willing to supply
additional information and clarification as to what exactly they
bid on this system for the City of Mound. Although both companies
can supply equipment that meet the overall specification for the
project, in examining the bids carefully, we have determined the
following:
1. Northern Water Works bid a handheld device called the
,'Unigun". This particular handheld device, after talking
with Northern, is not the latest technological device
available from them or their manufacturer, which is
Schlumberger. The Utilities Superintendent was told
following the bid that the "latest in technology" unit
would cost $1000 per unit. The city requires two
handheld units which would then make the cost $2000 for
the latest technological handheld device. Further
conversations since January 5th have led to Northern
offering the two handheld devices at no extra charge.
Although the specification did not specifically say
,'latest technological device" for the handheld unit,
conversations leading up to the system being sent out for
bids, made it clear to both companies that the City of
Mound was looking for the most advanced unit available.
It did not make sense for the City to specify a handheld
unit that was not state of the art. In addition, it
would be inappropriate for the city to allow one vendor
to come in after the bids were opened to negotiate an
alternative that should have been bid in the first place
per the specification and the knowledge that the company
had about the City's intent with regard to the handheld
reading device.
2. The experience level of Northern Water Works is somewhat
questionable as it relates ~q~eguiDmen~installgtiQn and
computer software. We contacted several ~of the
commUnities that Northern had listed within their bid as
to companies that have installed this type of water meter
reading system equipment. We found several communities
that had purchased Schlumberger equipment through
Northern but did not actually have them installed by
Northern or their subcontractor, Water Services. They
also specified that Water Services had done installations
for them but, in talking with some of these communities,
it was clear that Water Services had done water meter
Page 3
reading equipment installations, but of the ones we
talked to, they were not Schlumberger equipment, but
rather Sensus, which is being offered by Water Pro. In
addition, the experience level with regard to computer
software does not appear to be well established. We
found one community who utilizes the same firm we use for
utility billing (Computoservice out of Mankato,
Minnesota) and had purchased the water meter reading
equipment from Northern Water Works. They indicated that
they were probably going to move away from Computoservice
because Computoservice's utility billing did not satisfy
the requirements or proper interfacing with Northern
Water Works' water meter reading equipment. Suffice it
to say that the experience level of the computer
interface is important and must be well established so
that the comfortability of the city is assured. There
are other issues to analyze, but most of them are of a
subjective nature, whereas, the above items are more
clear cut to assist in making a decision.
You basically have two options to consider:
1. Award the bid
2. Reject all bids and re-advertise
It is the city Staff recommendation that you award the bid.
Based upon the analysis that we have provided, we recommend that
you award the bid to Water Pro in the amount of $339,600, and
authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a contract with
Water Pro for the water meter reading system, manufactured by
Sensus and distributed by Water Pro.
ES:is
PROPOSED RESOLUTION ~94-
RESOLUTION TO ~PPROVE ~ VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE ~
NONCONFORMING FRONT YARD SETBACK TO THE PRINCIPAL DWELLING
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF ~ DETACHED GARAGE AND AN
ADDITION TO THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE AT
2156 CENTERVIEW LANE, LOTS 8 & 31, BLOCK ?,
ABRAHAM LINCOLN/%DDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK,
PID #13-117-Z4 31 005Z, P&Z CASE #94-02
WHEREAS, the owners, Don and Terry Bonnicksen, have applied
for a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming front yard
setback of 17.5 feet in order to accomplish the following:
Remove existing front entry roof and nonconforming shed.
Add 2 feet to existing rear porch that is currently being
converted into a laundry room.
Construct a fully conforming 24' x 34' detached garage.
Construct a 12' x 14' fully conforming rear deck.
construct a future second story addition (note sketch
plans), this addition steps back from the footprint of
the existing dwelling setbacks and is also conforming.
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-lA
Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City
Code requires a lot area of 6,000 square feet, a 20 foot front yard
setback to both streets and 6 foot side yard setbacks, and;
WHEREAS, all other setbacks, lot area, and lot coverage are
conforming, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
unanimously recommended approval as this project represents a
substantial improvement to the property, improvement of the
existing front yard encroachment, and the proposal is conforming to
the Zoning Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
The City does hereby grant a 2.5 foot front yard setback
variance upon the condition that the nonconforming shed and
existing front entry roof be removed.
The city Council authorizes the alterations set forth below,
pursuant to Section 350:420, Subdivision 8 of the Zoning
Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the
use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of
the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420.
Proposed Resolution
Page 2
Case #94-02
Se
Se
It is determined that the livabilit¥ of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the
following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to
afford the owners reasonable use of their land:
Add 2 feet to the existing rear porch that is currently
being converted into a laundry room.
Construct a fully conforming 24' x 34' detached garage.
Construct a 12' x 14' fully conforming rear deck.
Construct a future second story addition as shown on the
sketch plans submitted with the application.
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property:
Lots $ and 31, Block 7, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside
Park, PID #13-117-24 31 0052.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to
Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for
such recording. A building permit for the subject
construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has
been filed with the City Clerk.
MINUTES OF A MF ETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 10, 1994
CASE ~94-02: DON & TERRY BONNICKSEN, 2156 CENTERVIEW LANE, LOTS
8 & 31t BLOCK ?, ]%BRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARKt PID
~13-117-24 31 0052. VARIANCE FOR G~RAGE.
Building official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant's request
for a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming front yard
setback of 17.5 feet in order to accomplish the following:
1. Remove existing front entry roof and nonconforming shed.
Add 2 feet to existing rear porch that is currently being
converted into a laundry room.
3. Construct a fully conforming 24' x 34' detached garage.
4. Construct a 12' x 14' fully conforming rear deck.
Construct a future second story addition (note sketch plans),
this addition steps back from the footprint of the existing
dwelling setbacks and is also conforming.
The front yard setback would actually be improved by the removal of
the front entry roof (this roof is not shown on the survey), and
the construction of the decorative 2 foot entry gable.
Due to the oncoming winter weather and time constraints of the
variance process, the applicant has, at his own risk, installed the
garage slab. It was inspected for proper setbacks and construction
prior to pouring.
Staff recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval as
this project represents a substantial improvement to the property,
improvement of the existing front yard encroachment, and the
proposal is conforming to the Zoning Ordinance, upon the condition
that the nonconforming shed and existing front entry roof be
removed.
MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Hanus, to recommend
approval of the variance as recommended by staff. Motion
carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on January 11, 1994.
Certificate of Survey for Don Bonntcksen
of Lots 8 & 31, Block 7, Abraham Lincoln Addition
to Lakeside Park
Hennepin County, Minnesota
,.9
/
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYED:
Lots 8 and 31,Block 7, "Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park. Mound,
Mtnnetonka"
This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property,
the location of an existing house and shed thereon, and the proDosed location
of a proposed garage. It does not purport to show any other improvements or
encroachments.
Iron marker found
Iron marker set
Denotes distance shown on record plat of "Abraham Lincoln Addition to
Lakeside Park. Mound. Minnetonka"
i-r1
,,;
,,,,
Don Bonnick=on
PHONE 472-1717
Don Bonnickson
PHONE 472-1717
I,
/ i; C'J','7(
q
Don Bonnickson ~~ .
PHONE 472-1717
GENERAL ZONING INFOR31ATION SIIEEY
, ADDRESS: x , _ -- ~ * ~ ~ [~ ~ ~ -- ~-'~
Su=vey on rile? yes~ no~ Date o~ suFvey ~ o~ Record? yes no~
Required ~t Width: (frontage on an ~ptoved ~blic ~reet)
Existing ~t Width__ ~ / , Depth_ ~ 0 /
IBTBACKS REQUIRED~ ~
PRINCIP~ BUILD ING
/~ ~-- [~t SIDE~ H S I W or 6'
aIDE: E W
~: H S g w 4'
N S E W 1S'
, ' fr~ O.~.W.~ ,. ~SHO~ --
I ~ FRONT: N S E
~ -- / ~ i SIDE: /a ,S E W ~ L / -
IS THI
BY ~
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mound City Council
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: December 29, 1993
SUBJECT: Truck Parking in Residential Areas
At a recent City Council meeting, staff was asked to review City Code Section 350:760 which
regulates truck parking in residential areas. The intent in requesting the review was to compare
Mound's standards to those commonly used in other municipalities, the purpose of such
comparison being to determine if Mound is too strict, or perhaps, too lenient under the current
provisions.
Before examining Mound's provisions as well as those of other communities, it may be
beneficial to review the intent that is common to provisions of this type. Zoning ordinances
in any community attempt to segregate residential, commercial and industrial uses. Allowed
uses, provisions, and restrictions applicable to any of these three general zoning classifications
are intended to ensure that they can contain uses that are not impeded by undue conflicts. For
example, homes in residential zones are protected from the noise, traffic and activity associated
with an industrial use. Conversely, industrial districts are permitted to operate free from the
limiting provisions that are imposed in most residential districts.
The parking of trucks in residential areas is an extension of this general philosophy of zoning.
Residentially zoned areas are intended to accommodate people in various forms of housing as
well as related accessory uses. Parking in most residential zoning districts is limited to
automobiles, pickup trucks and recreational vehicles, all of which are associated with the non-
commercial use of residential properties. Most types of trucks which are commonly associated
with commercial and industrial uses are excluded from residential areas.
Mound currently has a provision in its Code which regulates truck parking in residential areas.
It states, "No motor vehicle over one (1) ton capacity bearing a commercial license and no
commercially licensed trailer shall be parked or stored in a platted residential district or a
public street except when loading, unloading, or rendering a service. Recreation vehicles and
pickups are not restricted by the terms of this provision." This provision prohibits any
commercially licensed vehicle from parking in any of Mound's residential areas.
loP-
Land Use / Environmental · Planning / Design
7300 Metro Boulevard/Suite 525 · Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 · (612) 835-9960 · Fax: (612) 835-3160
I Il
Truck Parking Memorandum
December 29, 1993
Page 2
Why does Mound's Code contain this provision? The answer to this question can only be
offered as speculation. Presumably, the author of this restriction and the City Council that
originally enacted it had a number of goals in mind. First, its reasonable to assume that it was
thought to be a logical extension of the general zoning philosophy that was outlined earlier.
More specific than that, it may be reasonable to assume that the provision was intended to
protect residential properties from commercial/industrial trucks that c, puld r>ose a_ safety
~m and could diminish the attractive appearanc~e if not also the value of residential
neighborhoods. The--City uouncil at the time might have also considered the development
pattern in Mound as a basis for such a provision. Because of Mound's smaller lots and short
front yard setbacks (20' in many areas), any large vehicle such as a truck parked in a
residential area has a high probability of impacting neighboring properties. If Mound had
developed with a minimum half-acre lot size and correspondingly larger setbacks, the parking
of trucks may not have the same degree of impact.
How does Mound compare to other communities? The following is a random sampling of
restrictions used by other communities.
Prior Lake: Motor vehicles over one (1) ton capacity bearing a commercial license and
commercially licensed trailers shall not be parked in a residential area except when loading,
unloading or rendering a service. Such vehicles may be stored in residential areas if they are
parked in garages. Recreational vehicles and pickups are not restricted by the terms of this
provision.
Falcon Heights: Off-street parking facilities accessory to residential uses shall be utilized
solely for the parking of passenger automobiles and/or one (1) truck not to exceed 7,000
pounds gross capacity for each dwelling unit. Under no circumstances shall required parking
facilities be used for the storage of commercial vehicles or for the parking of automobiles
belonging to the employees, owners, tenants or customers of nearby business or manufacturing
establishments.
Shakopee: Off-street parking facilities accessory to residential uses shall be utilized solely for
the parking of passenger automobiles, except that for each dwelling unit, one truck not in
excess of 9,000 pounds rated capacity may be parked by the occupant within a structure.
Under no circumstances shall parking facilities accessory to residential structures be used for
open storage of commercial vehicles nor open air parking of automobiles belonging to the
employees, owner, tenant or customers of a business or manufacturing establishment.
Hopkins: Residential parking facilities may be used for the parking of automobiles and one
truck not to exceed a 9,000 pound rated capacity.
Truck Parking Memorandum
December 29, 1993
Page 3
Wayzata: Trucks of more than 12,000 GVW or greater than thirty (30) feet in length and
contracting or excavating equipment may not be parked, stored, or otherwise continued on any
property within the City for a period greater than twelve (12) hours unless being used in
conjunction with a temporary service benefitting the residential or commercial premises, except
that such trucks and equipment may be parked, stored and otherwise continued on property
zoned C-3 if used regularly by the property owner in his business.
Maple Grove: Off-street parking facilities accessory to residential uses shall be utilized solely
for the parking of licensed and operable passenger automobiles; no more than one (1) truck not
to exceed gross capacity of twelve thousand (12,000) pounds; and recreational vehicles and
equipment. Under no circumstances shall required parking facilities accessory to residential
structures be used for the storage of commercial vehicles or equipment or for the parking of
automobiles belonging to the employees, owners, tenants, or customers of business or
manufacturing establishments.
Are there any general trends that are common to these provisions? First of all, it is obvious
that all municipalities sampled see a public purpose in prohibiting certain types of trucks from
parking in residential areas. Most of the provisions prohibit commercial vehicles from parking
in residential areas. Some communities permit such parking, provided that it is contained
within a garage. The weight of allowed vehicles varies from one ton to 12,000 pounds.
In summary, Mounds weight restriction limitation (1 ton) is on the low end of the communities
sampled. Mound's prohibition of commercial vehicles or commercial trailers is a restriction
that is common to most of the communities sampled.
As a footnote to this issue, the attachment identifies types of trucks that range from 14,250 to
25,080 gross vehicle weight. All of these vehicles would be excluded from parking in any
residential neighborhood in all of the communities sampled either due to excessive weight or
because all of them would presumably be licensed as commercial vehicles.
RECOMMENDATION: After reviewing this issue, if the City Council determines that
modifications of the existing Code section should be further investigated, the issue should be
referred to the Planning Commission for their input and recommendation. The Planning
Commission's task will be more focused if the Council can provide specific direction on
elements of the current provision that may need to be changed.
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
mill
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mound City Council and Staff
Mark Koegler, City Planner
December 30, 1993
Time Limits on Building Completions
The City Council recently directed staff to investigate the feasibility of restricting the amount
of time allowed for building construction. This issue was raised because there have been a
number of instances where construction has started on a building (typically residential) and due
to a variety of circumstances, completion takes a number of years. This situation can impact
the aesthetics of a neighborhood area and create unsightly conditions for neighboring
properties. In response to this issue, a number of communities have enacted ordinance
provisions placing limits on the allowable duration of construction. Similar provisions may
be applicable to Mound.
When the City Council requests additional information on an ordinance issue, one of the
sources that is typically used is information obtained from other municipalities. In this case,
Jon Sutherland contacted the City of White Bear Lake who were kind enough to share a survey
that they completed in December of 1993 on this specific issue. The information collected by
the City of White Bear Lake is thorough enough for initial discussions, hence, staff has not
contacted any additional communities for further information. If warranted at a later date,
additional contacts can be made.
As you will see from the attached material, communities generally approach this issue in one
of three ways: 1) ordinance provisions are enacted controlling the time allowed for completion
of the exterior of a building, 2) ordinance provisions require total building completion within
specified time limits, or 3) communities employ the UBC provisions which allow construction
to continue indefinitely provided that the work is not abandoned for a continuous period
exceeding 180 days. Mound presently handles this matter consistent with the UBC
requirements identified in #3.
If so inclined, the Mound City Council can adopt provisions regulating the completion of
buildings. Any ordinance change of this nature is required to first be reviewed by the Planning
Commission with a recommendation being forwarded to the City Council. At this stage, the
Council may want to provided some guidance for the framework of such an ordinance. Such
Land Use/Environmental · Planning/Design
'3~) Metro Boulevard /Suite 525 · Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 ' (612) 835-9960 ' Fax: (612) 835-3160
Building Completion Memorandum
December 30, 1993
Page 2
a framework essentially needs to address only two or three key issues. They include: 1)
should such an ordinance apply only to the exterior finish of a building or should it regulate
total completion, 2) should such provisions apply to all types of structures including residential,
commercial and industrial buildings as well as accessory structures, and 3) how much time
should be allowed for building completion?
RECOMMENDATION: After discussing this issue and offering preliminary comments on
the questions raised above, the City Council may want to refer this issue to the Planning
Commission for further analysis. After review and a public hearing at the Planning
Commission level, this issue can be brought back to the City Council for final action.
BLDGCOMP.MEM
MEMORANDUM
TO:.
FROM:
RE:
DAT~
Mayor, City Council, sad City Manager
Joe Merchak, Chief Building Official
Sun~ey of Ordinances Limiting Tune for Completing Building Projects
December 10, 1993
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to the City Council's directive, staff contacted other cities to determine their
success in enforcing ordinances which limit the amount of time for the completion of
buildings under construction. Twelve cities responded to our contacts and copies of theix
applicable ordinances were requested. Those ordinances which have been received to date
are included in the exhibits attached hereto.
SURVEY: ~
Fi~'e of the cities (Cottage G'rove, Ed~na, Maplewood, Minneapolis, and St. Louis Park)
'Sup;eyed have ordinances which require the exterior finish of one and two family dwellings
and their accessory building to be completed within a specified amount of time. These
periods of time ranged ~rom 160 days to one year after permit issuance. One (Cottage
Grove) of the five cities also applied the requirement to non-residential buildings. (Exh~it
A includes a variety of ordinances dealing with time limitations.)
One city (Oakdale) required one and two family dwellings to be totally completed (interior
and exterior) within one year and their accessory buildings within six months. (Refer to
Exh~it B for an example of this type of ordinance).
five-dries (Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Richfield, Shoreview and West St. Paul)
generally only enforce the Uniform Building Code provisions which allow construction to
continue indefinitely provided the work is not abandoned for a continuous period exceeding
180 days. This policy is the same as is in effect in the City of White Bear Lake.
S_ . ',. ,__-._,_~._ ~,,ao ,,rovides a more comprehensive approach yudlnl the
nad nrov[d~..~ fO[' Divas and a timetable o! up
--- r--.--5--- _ _' .... r use and/or demolition of the buildin[. Chapter 4:) pe..r~uns_m
a ro ante oc~ui~u,,7 ,;
~mo,-Mes (6 m~nths with 3 month extension) and Performnnce I:~on~ t. or wo, rz aone,.unocr
"-.-": ~. · .......... +-..ctur-- nuisance and vacant buildings mto coae compuance.
pefllllt tO oftnJ oanscsuua ~u. ,.-,
(See Exh~it C).
Of the cities with residential .ext~rior finish completion timetables and the City of S.t. Paul
regulating permits under their Chapter 33 reported a virtual 100% success ratio tn their
enforcement of these ordinances.
JM:pb:mjmg
wpSl~nemoLmrvey
Iio
section -~o - ~rlor of ~1~ ~ Unit
and Double Dwelling Unit Buildin~
Ha'tOry: Ord 410 adopted 8.10-88
///
EXHIBIT
INIPECTIOfll DIVI$10N
Idl~qW~ LJJ~k~ P.E.. ~
~,,_~'~ON 89.165M[Nl~EAI~OLIS COl)F, OF ORDI~ANCF_,S
COMPL ~ETI_ ON OF WORK
ATTENTION: HOMEOWNERS/CONTRACTORS
?crmits obtained for alterations, rcpa{rs or remodeling to thc cxtcriors of shtglc
f~mily or two family dwellings, including attached or dctachcd garage,% must
havc all work completed with~ o_~nc (1) year front thc date of Gtc permit i.~.~uance.
The person obtaining thc permit is responsible for this completion. Any
permittee who violates this due date ~all be liabl~ to pay a penalty of $25.00 for
each day of violation. Payment of these penalties ]nay be enforced by civil
action. The permiucc will be guilty of a misdemeanor. Work not completed on
the exterior within one (l) year from ~he date o£the ~enr~it issuance shall be
considered a nuisance.
Ti~s nuisa~cc condition may be abalcd bx' '..he D~recter o£ !nspcctions by
completing ~he work or removing it an.d res~o,6ng the building to its original
candition prior to con.~trucr/on or alteraticn..4,.il costs h~ctu'red for city workers
or contractors, including administrative co.~t.% equipr..,en~ costs plus materials?
shall be assessed, levied and collected as a special assessment payable in one .~urn
or by up to ten (~0) equal annual installments against the property.
AF'FIM~TNE AC"T~:)W
foil 89.165
Procedures prtor t,o tag:
a. All permtt documents (plans, permit application, permtt) are stamped
by Plan Revtew and the Permit Counter. Additionally the eermqt Counter
&1SO gives the homeowner the wrltten notlce containing the highlights
of ~lnneapolls Ordinance 8g.]65.
b. Building Fteld Inspectors shall identify projects exhibiting slo~
progress ]80 days out from the permtt date, The Inspector shall send
a special "180 day letter" which contatns a remtnder of Ordinance 89,I65
and tho need to complete the exterior ~lthin one year of the permit Oay.
C. At eleven aonths out fr~ the permit date, the.building inspector shall
arrange a meeting between the City Attorney, the pe~ittee, the
Supervisor of Building. and the area inspector. The purpose of this
meeting is to obtain an agree~nt from the permittee for a c~npletion
date for the exterior work. A copy of this signeo agreement shall be
sent to the permittee after the meeting.
d. If no agreement can be reached, the area inspector shall tag t~e
permittee under 89.165 at ~2 months.
e. If permittee Ooes no~ complete the work by %he agreec upon oato, the
area inspector shall tag the permittee on that oate - tag unoer 89.165.
~. The area ~nspector w~ll out a nolo on additional hoye~wner perm'tS
for ~neir aooress (Connie Fournier w~ll draft, a~ o~:~nance emD!oynng
89.3~ For F!oye Olson, City At%arvey, which .~ili re~iect non-cD?~pliance
. n~, ~ssuine adoi* c~al tom,owner bj''~n~
w~t~ ~9 !65 as grounos for ~' ~ · -
perm: ts. '
2/93
//,3
! #.1~0 ~UNZ~.U'OLI8 GOD;
87.150 for tho rogiltr~t$on of v&c&nt
bo~rdad-up hulldin~. (~ IgC, ~ ~u~d.,
11.190; O~ o~6-~, ~ 1; 89~.14~, [ 1, ~11~9)
S9,165, Comp]eUo~ et work. (~ ~!
~mmen~d pu~u~t ~ ~e ~u~ ~ · buU~ng
~rmit b~ ~e dior of in~O~ ~r ~
~'~e.~fly dw~ling or t~f~Y dweUi~ in-
~uding an at~ch~ or de~ch~ ~r~, sh~l b
~mple~d within one (U ye~ f~m the da~
issuM~ce of the bufl~g ~mfit ~ wl~n one
ye~ from the eff~ti~ da~ of ~ls
whichever i8 Jeer. ~e ~r of~s~fio~ may
ox~od the ~me for ~mple~on u~n ~t~n ~-
quest of the permit~, e~bli~ng ~ ~c
able sa~sfsc~on of~e ~r that
~yond the con~ol ~e ~~ proven~ ~m-
plotion of the work for whi~ ~e ~r~t
~d. ~is ex~nsion 8hah ~ re~t~ not le~
th~ eight (8) busine~ days prior to the end of the
one-ye~ ~. The ~mit be~ n~ ~d void
at ~e end of ~e one-yc~ ~ flit has not ~
so ex~nded. The permittec is responsible-for
seeinK that the work is
~) Any permi~L~ who ~oJa~s subs~tion
sh&l be liable ~o ~y a ~n~y of twcn~-~xve
l~s ($25.00~ for e~ch day of violation. Pa~ent
~he~e 9en~tic~ may be enforced by civil action.
(c) ~y permittce who violate subsection :,a~
~ty of n
(d) A single.family dwelling or ~wo.fam~ly
dwelling including ~ at~chcd or de.chad
ra~ u~n which work h~ ~n s~d for thc
pu~ose of ~g, ~ng or ~m~cl~g
ex~rior of such dwelling or g~age but u~n which
work has not ~en completed within one (1~ year
~om ~e de~ of~e i~an~ of~e bu~g ~it
~s requ~ by ~ ~on sh~ ~ ~nsid~ a
nu~ancc. The d~ of ins~o~ ~ his
tion may, in ad~tion ~ o~er ~m~ies aba~ ~s
nuisance by doing ~
{1} ~ng a ~ u~n ~e ~it~ ~
~y other p~ ~ or ~n belden
of ~rd ~ui~g ~e ~r~t~o ~
~mple~ the ~k pu~u~t ~ ~e ~
or ~m ~o d~ling or ~gc ~ ~e ~-
dition R w~ in ~fore ~e work ~
,ach condition ts lawktl) within ton (10) cal-
endar days. 'l~is notice may b~ served per-
~dly or by ~ upon the permittee et
tho addre,s ebown on the permit and upon
other owners or lien holdcra at their last
krsown address. The notice shall further in.
form the permittee of the director's intent
to abat~ the nuisance as provided in this
section.
(2) If at thc end of the ten (I0} calonde~ day
period specified above the work has not been
completed pursuant to the permit or the
dwcFting or garage restored to the con&-
tion it was in before the work began (if such
condition is lawful) then thc director may
in his discretion direct the removal of all
work done on the dwelling or garage and
r~-tor¢ it to the condition it was in before
the work begun (if such condition is
or flirt his judgmcnt it will be substm~tially
less expensive ~irect tho completion of the
work or the pa~ial completion of the work
.... in_a manner_so as to comply with the
budding codc.
(~ .All costs incurrcd by the city including but
not timitod to c~sts for service oi' notices,
~epartmental ces:s and expenses inc]ud:.ng
overhead and e~:wo~cc ~or time e'.' city e..~-
l~]c~yees, cx~e of eq~:ipme~.~ used, and
sums of money p~id ou~ if done by o~her
~an city ~epa_~ments shah be computed
by the director ~' inepections end shall be
~sessed, lev~e~ end collected as
azsessmont payable in one (~} su~. or by up
~o ten (10) equo] annual installments as thc
council may provide against the property
at which the work was ~moved, completed
er part~ally ccmplctcd. The director shall
c'o~ain permission of the city couno! for any
abatement he estimates wiLl cost m cxce~
of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00}.
(e) The director of inspections when consld~ring
whether to abate thc nuisance shall consider the
following:
(~} Whether the uncompleted work is visible
from other properties.
(2) Whether tho uncompleted work is visible
from public rights-of, way.
Supp. No. P
494
Surety
A~tome~"-In-F&ot
_ (CF, AL!
_ (SEAL)
State of Mlnne.oto
1 sa. Acknowledgement ee to Prlncil)d (Individual)
County of Ram~y )
On this day of j of 19 ., came to before me personally
. -- _, to me well known to be the persona who executed to foregoing
bond, and each Nverally acknowledged the same to be hi8 free tot ~nd deed.
State of Minnesot~
Not~ry Public, Ramsay County, Minneso;~
My Commission expires
}
) ss. Acknowledgement aa to Principal {Corporation)
County of Ramsay ) -
On this _._ day of , of 19__.., before me appLsre, .
__to me personal~ known, who being duly. swor.n, .d_id s.ay th. at
~of the _, and that me seal ~..-~X. _ed tO the
he ~ ,- -- - - .... : ::&, ^' ~;d co,~oration, and that satd ~netrument
oin ins~rumen; =tne corpuru,u 9=,=, ,,. o-, -,- .
foreg . g _ -= ---,*-= :-- behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board .of
was s;gneo ~.no ,.~,,=u ,,, . acknowledged said instrument to
Directors, and saia -
the free aG! and deed of ~aid oorporation.
Notary Public, Ramsey CountY, Minnesota
My Commission expire9
State of Minnesot~
} ss. Acknowledgement as to Surezy
County of Ramsay ! , severally, being duly sworn, each for himself says he
ia one of the sureties to the ~bove bond, and that he i8 a resident of the State of
Minnesota, and thst he is seized in fee of r~! estate situate in said state end not
exempt by law from sa~e on exec~rtion, of the value and worth, over end above all
encumbrances thereon, t~a sum specified in the foregoing bond.
SubscriPted ~lnd sworn to before me thL~ ___ day of -, 19 ...
Not.ry Public, Ramsay County, Minnesota
My Commission explre~
(A Valid Power of Attorney for Attomey-ln-F~t Must Be Attached)
Bond Number
V~lcmnt BulG'lna performance Bond
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PREa~: That we _
i~-prln¢ipal of tim ~ or to be I~ued permit, end
as surety, of the county of j end state of ,
ere held and firmly bound onto the CiTY OF ~4JNT PAUL in-the mum of
· (e ) lawful money of the United State., to be p_aid t.o I~. ~ OF ?AINT
PAUL, It 8uccelaors or I~lgne, for whioh i~yment, wen and trury to be maas, we
Jointly and severally bind ourselves and each of our beir~, executor~, idministretor8,
8ucce~or8 and .selene. firmly by these presents.
SEALED WITH OUR SEALS, and dated thb .., day of ______---, 19i.
The condition of this.otdigation b such that the above bounden
had made an applicmtk)nto the CITY OF SAINT PAUL for a Buitding Permit (or BuUding
Permits} to repair the structure at C.ode Compliance Inspection Report, Saint Paul
to oonform to the provisions of the
Legislative Code Seotlon 33.04 (f}, Minnesota State Law, or appropriate Saint Paul
City Council File granting specifio permission for the above.
NOW, THEREFORE, if the aba? bounden
shall faithfully and fully perform and meet all of the
terms, conditions and obligations imposed by the permit, the Saint Paul Legislative
Code, Minnesota State Law, or appropriate Saint Paul City Council File, and further
that such activities shall carry with it the obligation to save, indemnify, save harmless
and defend the CITY OF SAINT PAUL from all claims, judgements, suits, costs,
charges, demands and expenses that may accrue to persons or property as a result
of the .ctivity of the above bounded principal in accordance with the requirements of
.... . ...... .d r~unciI File, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to
em'.~nWi~°f~;~"c~e~= ~ e~f~ec,: provided, however, that.~ additlo, n. ?e ~,e~?.. on_ this.
bond ia liable w _i~..in the time periods imposed by.law either_to. _ol)_?~ ? ve..n,T~.ate ?T
Compfiance/Certificite of Occupancy, or pay the sum o1 SZ,UUu to tne ~Y in
8stisfact~on of the costs of abatement of the property.
· Liability of the surety On this bond ehal be terminated for the activities of said
prinolp.aJ, either: 1) occurring on or_ ifter_th?, day of , lg .... ; or
2) oontinuous untl a Notice of Cancellation b ~ with this office. (Cro8~ out
whichever one does hal apply.)
in the event of c~ncellation on the port of the 8urea, not_i~e ..hall be. .give~. by
registered mai to the CITY OF SAINT PAUL and to the pnnclpal It least thyty o8y$
(30) prior to such temimtion d.te.
LIKIiSLATIV{{ C'(X)B ~ ~ .... --BUILD{NOS
DANOEROUS STRU~ - NUiSAN~2 BUILDINOS vA~.~ro
~xce ...... ,--- '- -'-:- --+ton a Ce. r0r~'e of Co~llance un.d~r._
pt as ome _r~v..tse mpey. ~u m ,,,.-- ~y.-_ .,__.-__ ,, ~, .,,.+ ~,. ot~nined With,n
· cate Ol ~ Ui~O~,r ;:)c~-uvu oo.uo ,-,,~, ~' .
Sect. ion ~3.06 or a Cern] . paim~ on
3 month thne extensi
· e on. One (1) three ( ) .
be nd the initial (6) month tune ,m~.j?uon .may.ue r~...~.~_
considered by the Bu,ld'u~ Official, Jf it can ...........
proceeding e~q~editiously and is more than S0% complete or u uzuorsccn
had $]~{ficant impact on d~e completion of work.
The provisions for completion of rehabilitation wiihLu six ($) months aug the three
(3) month e~teu$1on, apply only to property_ not preseutly subjeci
property pursuant to Chapter 4~ or 45 of the Saiu! Paul
DivMon of Public Health, the DeparUnen~ of FFe and Safety Services o~ the Saiu~ Paul
City.' Council. NorwithstancFm§ the time limitation established under this section, the City
Council reserves the r~ght to shorten thc time pe. riod for comp. l.eti.o.n.o,.f the rehabilitation
throu~ any order or resolution issued pursuant to Chapters 4.% ,~.xu, aud 45.11 of this
code.
In the e~.u! the build'rog is restored to habitable condkion and a ~cate of
Compliance and/or Cer~cate of Occupancy is obt~ed -,vithin the {~ue limits sci out
here~n, the Two Thousand Dolla,~ (5'2,000.00) shall be refunded with interest by the
Deparunent of F'mance.
If a Certificate of Compliance or Cenific.~e of Occup~cy is.no~. ~ wi. th'?.the.
........... '-'- secti'"' all monies ~posnexi ~1 ~e torte?
Ume perioa aumonzeo ptu~mnt to_m~ '~' ""- ...... ' -'- .... ·---'~on
without refund to thc City and the City may proceea
undex the provisions of Chapter 45 of this code.
~,, ~,,,{~n~ ~ubiect to the restrictions ~ this section
1o that building has been issue~. Kenaum. _.tau? tmu~-,~.~ ~_~
of Planning and Economic Dcm~Jopment shall 0e exempt ~m
deposit.
In lien. of the $2,0(X)J~O_depo~ refe~,:e ~ · perForm..an~ ~ In. the same
amount runmug ~avor or the C~J may be substituted with the ~plicauofl permn.
NOT_ICE
Pcrmon$ lut~ndln{ to do work on th~ buildin{ desen'bed must firmt apply for a eod~
family dw611 is $100.00.
family dwelling mspecuon f~ is $125.00.
made by building, heating, electricS, and plumbing inspectors ami a list of ddidendea
compiled.
Three unit or more apartment buildings, industrial and commercial bm-re'roEs, apply
at Fue Prevention Off'me, 100 East l lth Sueet, 228-62.30.
Fire Depar~ent report must be brought in when applying for a building permit.
To obtain permits the applicant must:
1. Agree to repair all of the items listed on the in~-ction report as a condition
of the permits.
Deposit $2,000 with the City for dangerous su'uctures and buikfa~ classified
as nuisances as a guarantee of performance. This money will be held by the
City at interest and refunded at the time of completion, pwvided thc work is
completed within six (6) months. Failure to complete the work within six
months will result in forfeiture of the delx:~it and interest.
3. Submit plans and specifications when required and pay for and receiv~ &
building permit and, when applicable, eltclzical, heating and plumbing .permits.
4. Obtain a 'sign-off' of the permits and receive a letter of compliance and a
rdund of the $2,000 guarantee deposit and interest.
One three-momh e~.nsion may be gra~ ff the mvork is ~
Jnd is ~t least $0~ completed at the end of the
CITY OF OAKDAI,E
G~i~?~'l~. ~xterior to be ooupletod peter to oaoupanoy;
completion TAme for O~oup R, DivAsAon ~ and K OccupAncies &nd
xacsssory Buildings.
Ail GroUp R, Oivision 3 and M occupancies, as defined in f, he
Uniform Building Code, shall require the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) prior to occupancy of the
dwelling. The Cer~ificate of Occupancy will be issued subject to
the following conditions:
(a) The exterior of the building shall be co2pleted.
(b) The base course of asphalt has been installed on tho streets
providing access to and abutting the lot.
(c) The permitted work shall be in compliance with the currently
adopted Uniform Building Code and its amendments.
~Group R, Division 3 and M buildings shall bm comp. letsd within one
(1) year of issuance of building permit.
Accessory buildings shall be completed wi~/%in six (6) months of
issuance of the building permit.
Any person unable, because ?f hardship, to satisfy %he conditions
specified within this Section, shall make an application for a
variance to the Chief Building Official. Tho decision of the
Chief Building Official may be appealed to the city council.
(Ordinance No. 363, 2/9/93)
leo, I-I. lur£aoe Water M&nag0nent J~nd.
(a) Def/nit~onst
45
'"' EXHIBIT B
IIIILOIKS MI) STICCTUR[S
at its dtacret4on issue e partial I~r~lt covering only the ~nouflt of york specified on the
fee~ for this partial .~lt sh411 not k c~ltN to t~ rflulir ~m~t ffl ~ the i~11CltlK of the
~ullr ~tt Is ~u~ltt~. ~ fees 1hill tn ill ci$~l ~ the ~1n1~.
tS. 197._ _ R_t$_tRvf0~.
fault of the Pe~tttfl or contrictor, I f~ of S30.~ v411 be che~ ~ ~11ect~. ~on ~ Ins~ct4~
ts cequest~ to be ~e outside of no~l bustness ~ I fee of S~.~ per ~ur, with I gtnt~ cha~e
of t~ ~u~s, shall ~ plJd to the Zssul~ Aut~rtty.
SEC. 1~.199. OOUBLE FEES.
Should any person begi~ work of any kind such as hereinbefore set forth or for which · permit frae
the issuing Authority is required without having secured the necessary pemit therefor frae the sa~d
issuing Authority either previous to or during the day which such work is commenced or, ~n the case of
sign or advertising str~cture, ~f the work should com..nee prior to obtaining · sign license, he shall,
when subsequently securing such persia! or license, ~e requ?red to pay do~ble fees hereinbefone provided
for such per. it or license and shall be sub.~ect to all the penal provisi~s of this Article and this
(Code, %g$8 $ GO,20; Ord. I1o. 7g-2,
(a) £very permit issued by the ~$suing Authority sha?l expire by lim~t~tion and become null and
if the installation or work authorized by the permit is not co~nmenced w~thin 120 days f~ the date of
issuance or if the ~rk or installation is suspended or abandoned at any time for a period of 120 days.
~e Issuing Authority may extend the t~me +o- action, by the applicant upon written request of the
aop'icant s,~o~in9 t~at ¢~rcumstanceS beyond tt~e control of the apo~i~ant have Qrevented action frown being
taken or when the lssu~nCj ~uthority ~ete~neS ~.~at an extension of tl~e ti~ fur action ~i~1 not interfere
.,t~ t~e purposes a~d intent Of th~s
(b) ~efore such ~rk or installation can ~e~in or respa, a ne~ per.it sha~l be first obtained to do
so, and the fee therefor sha~l ~e ],.2 of the a~unt required for a n~ per.it, p~vided no changes nave
been ~ade or ~i~ ~ ~de ~n the ~r~gin~ plans and s~cifications for suc~ ~rk and p~vided further that
such SuSpension or a~ndon~ent has not exceeded one year. After a one year suspension or abando~nt of
~rk. the pe~it c~ot be ren~.
SEC. 15.201. COHPLETION Or
(a) Any person altering, repairing or remodeling the exterior portion of a single-family dwelling or
two-family dwelling, including an attached or detached garage, shall complete such work within one year
frum the date of issuance of the building permit. The issuing Authority m~y extend the time for
coepletion upon written request of the permitter establlshing that circumstances b~yond the control of the
permitter prevented ceepletton of the work for which the building permit was authorized. This Ordinance
shell ap~ly to any person altering, r~pairing or retodel~ng exterio~ portions of & single faliily dwolltng
or · two-family dwelling for which a building permit has been outstanding for more than one year.
(b) Any person who shall violate sub-section
violation, payment of these penalties may b~ enforced I~ ctvtl action.
(Added by 0Id. NO. M-SS, I0'!5'84; 0Id. Ilo. 84-60, II-IS-M)
- S. Smoke Oe~~' All stngle and t~o.famtly
Secttofl 25 31Z_' tots on each level of
tructure where room are uleg Tur ~' ·
~a.$ ...... ..q~ L. 4-,*ailed tfl accor~J~nce with the Stile
smoke getector$
euildtng Code.
ir and Work. Any
~erson dotn.g a ~. P ........... -tructure cove~ed in Section IS 302(1)
~ucture aha acces)ur~ a
building_, .S.t _ _ - re air and/or replacement
of the ore, hence Code ~hall complete any
work in compliance with the standards contained in the definitions of
repair and/or replacement in Section 16-3X0,
($~o. ,~1~ added b~ Ord. Z60~o
. Structural and Life Safety Standards. Compliance
Section 16_3~): ..... ions of an ~'ousing maintenance
With the strucTur~ and life safety port Y
r uired under Section ~6-302 shall be in accordance with
inspection eq ...... . i inal construction,.
ode in e~Tec~ et the t~me of or
the butldi.ng c . __. r o heatth and safety at the
provided t)qere ~s no significant danget
time of inspection. .
If no building requirements were in effect mt the time of construction
or the requirements cannot be determined, compliance shall be made to
an extent to eliminate significant danger to health and safety. This
section is not meant to conflict wit~ hazardous buildings within the
terms of Sections ~5-400 & ~$-40Z; built-in deficiencies within
Section 15-3135 and tmnediate hazards within Section I~-3~4,
Exterior ~^~letion: One- and Two=~Famil Resident!al,
Section 15-3X8. bul e- and two-
?he roof and ~he
lamely structures., garages and accessory buildings shall be finished
with exterior building materials as set forth in the State Building Code
and the exterior architectural design requirements as provided in
Sections ~$-~ZO through XS-~2S of this Code within 1~ months of the
issuance of ~ building permit for new construction, alterations or
relocation.
BUILDINO CODF, I ~
(8) Whether tho uncompleted work b ioccs.
elblo to chfldrt~
(4) ~h~ ~e un~mp]~ ~k a~, ~
b ~m~ ~ ~e ~ ~mnt of mir.
(6) ~eth~ ~o ~ h~ ~u~ ~nab~
a~ila~e ~ a~ the nuie~
(f) If the work is not completed within one
year from the dato of issuance of the building
~rmit, or if the permit is extended as pro3;ided
herein and the work is not completed w;thin the
peried of the extension, the director of inspections
shall not issue a permit for the same work; or that
includes the same work; or that includes the same
cxtcrior portions of the ~ngl~ family dwelling, two-
family dwelling or garage involved; or that in*
eludes significant parts of the exterior portion of
the single-famiJy dwelling, two.£ami]y dwollL~g,
or garage involved within tin'es (3) years of the
date the work was required to bo completed ex.
copt as provided by this section.
The director of inspections shall issue a permit
within the three-year ~eriod if the applicent o.~
¢onditior. of the is~uflnce of the permit deposits
with :he director of inspections one thousand dol.
lars ($1.000.00) in :a~h or accep~ble negotiable
instrument. Thc money shall be deposited with
the city :reasurcr to be held without interest until
such time as t?.e money is refunded to the appli-
cant or forfeited t~ the city. The money shall be
forfeited to the city if thc work is not both com.
plctcd and certified by the director et inspccfions
as completed within six (6) months of the date of
issunnco of the permit. The money shall bc re-
funded within a reasonable time .after demand if
the work has been both completed and certified By
the director of inspections as completed within slx
(6) months of the date of issuance.
The permit shall become null and void six (6)
months from the date of issuance. Any pcrmittee
who fails to complete the work within six (6)
months from the date of issuance of the permit
shall be liable to pay a penalty et twenty-five dol-
~ ($25.00) for each clay of violation. Pearment of
~ Fenaltic~ may I~ enforced by civil action.
Any permitte4 who fail8 to complete tho work
within six (6) months aRcr obtilning a permit pur,
suant t~ tl~ sul~ectlon is ~uilty oft miedemcanor.
Any work which ha~ not been completed within
slx (6) montht after being permitted by this tub-
i~ction ma), bo ~ted u~ing the procedures
out in ~ubsectlon (d). It the director of fmpection8
returm to cert~ completion end/or return tho
po~tt, the permitt~e may appeal to the buLldlng
code board of appeeh u~thg tho procedure set out
in ~-~ion 8'/.820 upon the &ppllcimt'l claim that
the work was in fact completed within six (6)
mortthr~ cert~'tcati~n withil~ & reasonable time wits
improperly den~d, and!or the deposit improperly
retained. (01-O~167, § 1, 8-23-91)
89,170,. 89.180. RescrvecL
Editor's note-89.0r.146, J 1, &doptcd Au¥. I:1. l~Ug. re.
petaled ii 89.170, ~.l~O, which lectlon~ formerly p~rt~in~d to
vloJotio~ under pcrmi', nad permit construod. &nd which were
dorlved From Code 1960. as ~mcfl&d. J§ 11.~30, 11.140.
89.190. Resets'ed.
89.200. Rosc~.'ed.
£ditor'~ note~$-~.~:-146, I I. adcpted Aug 11. 1989.
l~,d~ J 89.2~, w~:~ section ~i~ed to pea.it tt~ ~c
w~ de~d from C~e 1960, ~ ~cnded. ~ 11450.
89.210. Permit requircd for each well;
record. Each ]izcnscc, before commencing ;o dig.
drill or construe: a~y well shall secure a perm::
from the engineer:ng dep~rtment. The engineerfl:g
department shE2 keep 'a record of each permit
isled, which rec~rcl shall show the location of the
work covered by ~aid permit {~ode 1950, As
Amend., § 342.090}
Crols references-'#at~r gener~ly, Ch. 509. :e~'~strt~ti:r.
of'private water su~;kcs, J 509.150; ~rmit '.o alter or rcpmr
pubhc w~U, J $09.21C;
89.220. Re,erred.
E~tor'o not~-$9-Or. 14S, J 1, t~ Aug. Il, 1~8~. ~-
~ J 89.220, whi~ ~ion ~ ~ mr~a~ ~ ~-
ll.l~: tn or~n~ dM~ 14. 1~4. J ~ 81~.~. J 3.
~ 8~17, J 1, ~d Feb. ~0. 1M9.
,e~pp. No. 2
495
Cbpter ~ et the Saint Paul l,qidsflu Code hrtetnl~ to YKant iud Unoccupied Bulldlnp
43.01. ~tlon of' polkT. ......... ~ of d~ ~ ,6,bldu
Sulxl.3. Owner.
v Subd.5. ~rK~'~/ed. A ~ wlgch ~s nc( bein~ uoed for · le~l oocul~ucy M clf..Kaed ia ~ S~ut ?~ul Le~laJ~ve Coda.
Su~.6. U~¢~,r,~. A building o~ lx~on of s 1:~14b~ ~ is ot~cn t~ retry t,y ~ ~ without the us~ of
Sul:~l. 7.
Sec. 43.03. Vacant bm3din~ relistrufion.
SuM. 1. 'Ibc owner ~ rcfifar with tl~ mforcemeoz oftlocr no I~r d~.2 ~ (~) ~ afttr any In~ldi~ ia tl~ city
· vecata buildi~ as defied ia Sectioa 43.02(7).
Subd.2. 'I~ refiotraioa tbsll b ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l~ ~
$u~1.7.
mforcczD~ ob.
Sec, 43.05. Notif'~.ition.
Once r. ry
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
CASE NO. 94-04
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW
A COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT IN THE B-! CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
AT $~33 SHORELINE DRIVE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will
meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 8, 1994 to
consider a request by Roger Dolliff to allow indoor storage of vintage automobiles, this proposed use
is being classified as a Commercial Parking Lot and requires a Conditional Use Permit.
The subject property is located at 5533 Shoreline Drive, legally described as follows: Lot 5 and
the Westerly 50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision Number 170 Hennepin County, Minnesota, PID
//13-117-24 33 0076.
All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity
to be heard at this meeting.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Mailed to property owners within 350' by January 24, 1993, and published in "The Laker' on January 24, 1993.
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MtNNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
December 20, 1993
Mr. Roger Dolliff
501 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55404
RE-
Existing Arco Auto Body Building
5533 Shoreline Drive, Mound
Dear Mr. Dolliff:
Your proposed use of the above property is unusual and does not
readily fall within any existing use category in the B-1 Zone.
Upon preliminary classification, the use it is most similar to is
a commercial parking lot, and this would require a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP). We could process a request from you by CUP and
respond to questions and issues as they arise at the Planning
Commission and City Council levels. As far as the City looking
favorably or not at your request, the answer is dependent upon the
action of the Planning Commission and City Council.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Building official
JS:pj
cc: ~d Shukle, City Manager
Mark Koegler, City Planner
enclosure: CUP Application
P.S. The owner must sign the Conditional Use Permit application form.
December
John Sutherland
Building Official
City of Mound
FAX: 472-0620
Mr. Sutherland:
11
AS I explained to you by telephone, I've looked at and am considering purchasing the building
two doors east of the House of Moy, which is currently an auto and boat repair shop. I am sorry
I can't give you the exact address but I'm sure you'll know which property I'm referring to.
Before getting into serious negotiations with the realtor, owner and other interested parties, I'd
like to have a pretty good idea that my purchase would be welcomed by the City of Mound.
Perhaps I mentioned to you that we currently own the building at 2261 Commerce, occupied by
Lalm Country Antiques.
I understand the city's long term intention is to completely redevelop the strip of land that would
include the garage I'm considering. If that's true, I wouldn't expect any buyer would buy and
invest a large sum of money on an individual building on that strip of properS.
What I am considering if I purchase that building, would be to use it as a private garage, There
would be no commercial application and u~zl for storage of vintage autos. If purchased, ! could
assure the city of the following;
All the boats, cars and junk of every sort would be removed from inside and
outside the building.
2. The large paint booth would be removed, since there would be no such activity.
3. Building would be painted and straightened as necessary.
4. Windows would probably be replaced with glass blocks.
5. I wouldn't plan on storing anything outside, even in the fenced-in yard.
Since such use would probably require a conditional use permit, I don't care to go ahead with
fux~ther negotiations towards purchase unless thc city looks favorably at my purchase and
occupancy as proposed. It may serve my need satisfactorily and at the same time improve the
aesthetics of entering the city. Before pursuing this further, I'd appreciate your advice and
counsel if the city may welcome such a change,
Sincerely,
Roger Dolliff
338-7021 Work
471-9152 Home
HENNEPIN
IL
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
417 North Fifth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1309
Phone: [612] 348-6846
FAX: [612) 348-8532
December 9, 1993
Ms. Joyce Nelson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Nelson:
Enclosed is Hennepin County's 1994 Municipal Recycling Grant Application. Please
complete and return the application by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, January 14, 1993. A
resolution passed by City Council/Boar~Commi~on approving submittal of the
application should be submitted with the application.
The County Board is expected to approve the 1994 municipal recycling entitlement grants
program on Tuesday, December 21, 1993. Funds for the incentive grants program are
not included in the proposed budget at this time.
If you have any questions, please call me at 348-6358.
Sincerely,
Paul M.
Planner, Recycling Unit
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an ~,qual opportunity employer
1994 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING GRANT APPLICATION
Hennepin Count~ Residentla! R~oycllng Program
January I - December 31, 1994
MOUND
City
~ ~.~.~.,~..~ ~ ~. ~. ,~v:.~-.v.- ........... 11-...1 ..... ,------i----~-~ ..... ,
Please provide a brief description of your city's recycling program within the space below. Include information on
promotional and waste reduction activities planned for this period. Note any major program changes from previous year.
A resolution passed by your Council/Board/Commission approving submittal of this application must be attached.
Mound will continue with the weekly curbside program. We will continue with our
Westonka Recyclotto, ($50.00 per week) drawing. The City will also have an
annual Spring Clean-up & Recycling Days, this~is~a great success in this area.
We collect furniture, mattress, carpeting, TV's and Etc., appliance , Goodwill,
tires, scrap· metal, phone books, batteries. We are also thinking of adding
a company to take fluorescent tubes.
A. Method City Uses To Fund its Portion Of The Recycling Expenses:
General Fund: [3 Yes CI No Utility Bill: I~Yes E3 No Monthly Charge/HH on Utility Bill: $ ~. 00
B. Curbside Collection Contractor: Knutson Services
C. Contract Dates/Term: D. Collection Cost HH/MO: $ t. 90
E. Collection Frequency: ~ Weekly El Bi-weekly D Twice Monthly
F. Refuse and Recycling Collected Same Day: ~3 Yes ~1 No
A. Program Administration $ 10,000
B. Promotional Activities $ 2,600
C. Collection
Curbside $ 74~920
Drop-Off $ 12,000
D. Curbside collection containers $ 2 500
"eVenues · Antici~ted:Re~nuesfr0:m~aleof RecY~iabl~: $:~
from Spring Clean-up
per HOUSehold X~!l~':"~°nth~:~=; :.: ! $~ °°6 'i .
Multi-Hous. i. ng
A. Residential Source-Separated Collections Curbside Drop-Off (Optlormu Total Tons
PAP E R: Newspaper 583 35 618
Corrugated Cardboard 37 4 41
Otf~e Paper 6 },6 22
Mixed Paper/Junk Mail
Magazines 16 !
Phone Books 2 2
Computer Paper
Other Paper
METAL: Alum. Cans & Foil 35 35
Steel & Tin Cans 44 44
Commingled Cans
Scrap Metal 120 ! 20
162
GLASS: Food & Beverage ].54 8
Other Glass
PLASTIC: PET
HDPE
Commingled Bottles 29 2 31
Polystyrene
Film Plastics
Other Plastics
OTHER Vehicle Batteries 8 8
RECYCLABLES: Textiles 33 33
Carpet 5 5
Household Goods
Other App 1. 36 36
Other TV's 32 32
Other
: · : ~': :Total:Tons ::'
·: : . .:: ::::::::::::::::::::::: :-:'::: ' i!:!: ::: ::!:! ::! i'i!~!!ili!:::::::"::" !i:i!' :: :' ': ....... :: i:'::: .... ~ .... ::::::.:::::: ...... :~.:ii: ~T~i~i:.~i~:j!~i!ili · ::~::3:]-~ :'
B. Other Materials Collected (Not Recycled)
Tires (1 tire = 20 lbs.) 32 t
Oil (1 gallon = 8 lbs.) ! 1 tons
Other
::: .::.::.:~: i:: ;! i :i:.: : · ' TOtal
BILLS,
January 11,1994
BATCH 3122
BATCH 3124
TOTAL BILLS
$142,906.77
59,069.10
$201,975.87
0 o
I ]! I
i ,,0(01
I
i;
o~
g
I I Ill I I
I I II I I I~1 I
'1
!
0
0
,0
Z
. i
I
o~-~
I
0
I
~4
la,J I'
i I I
II
Z
0
0
Z
,...I'
Z
_J
O0
,,I uj C~
I
,, ,~,~
-J I
ZZ
I
3.
t
z~
o
000~
000
oo
t
1
CITY Of M()t ND
January 11, 1994
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mayor
City Council
City Manager
Fran Clark, City Clerk
HEADLINER'S BAR & GRILL
Today I received the attached letter from Mark Saliterman, Headliner's Bar & Grill. This
letter conforms to Section 800:35, Subd. 2 & 3 of the City Code (also attached). I believe
the Council needs to acknowledge that there is a change in the corporate form of Headliner's
and remove Bill Feehan from all licenses that have been issued and run for part of 1994.
Mr. Saliterman is also in the process of changing Managers of Headliner's. He will be
submitting the Personal Information required by Section 800: I0, Subd. 2, b. of the City
Code for review and approval by the City.
pripted on recycled paper
472-1415
5241 Shoreline B/vd., Mound, Minnesota 55364
HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL, INC.
Diamond Hill Center
4301 Highway 7, Suite 100
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
January 10, 1994
Ms. Fran Clark
City Clerk
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364-1687
Dear Fran,
This letter is to inform you and in turn the City Council of
the following transactions regarding Headliners Bar & Grill (in
Mound) and the owning entity, Headliners Bar & Grill, Inc.:
Mark Saliterman has acquired all remaining stock in
Headliners Bar and Grill, Inc. by acquiring the stock
owned by Bill Feehan. Thus, Mark Saliterman is the
sole shareholder, director, and officer of the
corporation.
Bill Feehan's position at Headliners Bar & Grill has
been eliminated, as Bill is pursuing other career
interests.
Ail licenses related to Headliners Bar & Grill will
from this point on have only Mark Saliterman's name on
them. Bill Feehan no longer belongs on any licenses.
Of course, this change relates to the Liquor License
especially.
If you have need of further information, or have any
questions, please feel free to call me at 920-8282
Sincerely,
Mark A. Saliterman
Mound City Code Section 800:25
Section 800:25. Persons Ineligible for License. No license
shall be granted to ~ny person made ineligible for such a license
by state law. (ORD. ~56-1992 - 5/11/92)
Section 800:30. ~laces Ineligible for License~
Subd. I. General prohibitio~. No license shall be issued for
any place or any business ineligible for such a license under
state law. In addition, the existence of any of the following
conditions render the applicant and the following premises
ineligible for receipt of a Class A On-Sale license or a Class
B On-Sale license:
(a) Any restaurant which does not have a total market value,
including land, building, and equipment, of at least
$250,000 as appraised by the City assessor. (The
foregoing valuation provision shall not apply to the
existing municipal On-Sale liquor dispensary or to the
terms established by the Council.)
(b) Any hotel which does not have a total market value,
including land, building, and equipment, of at least
$500,000 as appraised by the City assessor.
(c) Any restaurant or hotel located in any zoning district
other then a commercial or commercial use district.
Subd. 3. Delinquent Taxes and Charaes. No license shall be
granted for operation on any premises on which taxes,
assessments, or other financial claims of the City are
delinquent and unpaid.
Section 800:35. gonditions of License.
Subd. 1. In General. Every license is subject to the
conditions in the following subdivisions and all other
provisions of this Section and of any other applicable
ordinance, state law, or regulation.
Subd. 2. ~hanges in Corporate Form - Notification
Requirements. Changes in the corporate or association
officers, corporate .charter, articles of incorporation,
by-laws, or partnership agreement, as the cases may be, shall
be submitted to the City Clerk within 30 days after such
changes are made. In the case of a corporation, the licensee
shall notify the City Clerk when a person not
8-30-93
Mound city Code Section 800:35, Subd. 3
listed in the application acquires an interest which, together
with that of his or her spouse, parent, brother, sister, or
child, exceeds 5%, and shall give all information about said
person as is required of a person pursuant to the provisions
of Section 800:10, Subd. 2.
Subd. 3 ~hanges in Corporate Form - Early Termination o~
f~e~. Any change of ownership or beneficial interest o~
sales of stock entitled to be voted at any meeting of the
stockholders of a corporation which result in a change in
voting control of the corporation by the persons owning shares
of stock therein shall be deemed equivalent to a transfer of
the license issued to such corporation, and any such license
shall be revoked and terminated 30 days after any such change
in ownership or beneficial interest of shares, unless the
Council shall have been notified of such change in writing and
shall have approved thereof.
Subd. 4. Changes in Physical condition of Licensed Premises
. Notification Requirement~. Proposed enlargement,
alteration' or extension of premises previously licensed shall
be reported to the City Clerk at or before the time
application is made for a building permit for any such change,
and the licensee shall also give such information as is
required by Section 800:10, Subd. 2.
Subd. 5. ~icensee's Responsibilit~. Every licensee is
responsible for the conduct of his or her place of business
and the conditions of sobriety and order in it. The act of
any employee on the licensed premises authorized to sell
intoxicating liquor there is deemed the act of the licensee as
well, and the licensee shall be liable to all penalties
provided by this Section and the law equally with the
employee.
5ubd. 6. ~. Every licensee shall allow any peace
officer, health officer, or properly designated officer or
employee of the City to enter, inspect, and search the
premises of the licensee during business hours without a
warrant. In addition, the business records of the licensee,
including federal and state tax returns, shall be available
for inspection by the City Manager, or other duly authorized
representative of the City or the City Council, at all
reasonable times.
Subd. 7. Display During Prohibited Hours. No On-Sale
establishment shall display liquor to the public during hours
when the sale of liquor is prohibited.
8-30-93
Mound city Code
Section 800:10, Subd. 1
Section 800=10. Application for License.
Subd. l. Application Form Require4. Every application for
a license to sell liquor or to allow the consumption of liquor
under Section 800:05 hereof shall be in the form prescribed by
the Commissioner of Public Safety and shall be verified and
filed with the City Clerk. No person shall make a false
statement in an application.
Subd. 2. Contents of Application. In addition to information
which may be required by the State Liquor Control
Commissioner, the application shall state:
(a) Whether the applicant is a natural person, corporation,
partnership or other form of organization.
(b) If the applicant is a natural person, the following
information shall be furnished:
(1) True name, place and date of birth, and street
residence address of applicant.
(2) Whether applicant has ever used or been known by a
name other than his or her true name, and if so,
what was such name, or names, and information
concerning dates and places where used.
(3) The name of the business if it is to be conducted
under a designation, name, or style other than the
full individual name of the applicant.
(4) Whether the applicant is married or single. If
married, true name place and date of birth, and
street residence address or applicant's present
spouse.
(5) Whether applicant and present spouse are registered
voters and, if so, where.
(6) Street addresses at which applicant and present
spouse have lived during the preceding ten years.
(7) Whether applicant or his or her spouse has ever
been convicted of any felony, crime, or violation
or any ordinance, other than traffic. If so, the
applicant shall furnish information as to the time,
place, and offense for which convictions were had.
8-30-93
Mound City Code
(c)
Section 800:10, Subd. 2 (b) (8)
(8)
Whether applicant or his or her spouse has ever
been engaged as an employee or in operating a
saloon, hotel, restaurant, cafe, tavern, or other
business of a similar nature. If so, applicant
shall furnish information as to the time, place,
and length of time.
(9) The name, address, and business address of each
person who is engaged in Minnesota in the business
of selling, manufacturing, or distributing
intoxicating liquor and who is nearer of kin to the
applicant or his or her spouse than second cousin,
whether of whole or half blood, or who is a
brother-in-law or sister-in-law of the applicant or
his or her spouse.
If the applicant is a partnership, the names and
addresses of all partners and all information concerning
each partner as is required of a single applicant in
paragraph (b) above. A managing partner, or partners,
shall be designated. The interest of each partner in the
business shall be disclosed. A true copy of the
partnership agreement shall be submitted with the
application.
If the applicant is a corporation or other organization
and is applying for an "On-Sale" license, the following
information shall be furnished:
(1) The name and, if incorporated, the state of
incorporation.
(2) A true copy of the certificate of incorporation,
articles of incorporation, or association agreement
and by-laws.
(3) The name of a manager or proprietor or other agent
in charge of the premises to be licensed, giving
all the information about said person as is
required of a single applicant in paragraph (b)
above.
(4) A list of all natural persons who, singly or
together with their spouse, or a parent, brother,
sister, or child of either of them, own or control
an interest in said corporation or association in
excess of 5%, or who are officers of said
corporation or association, together with their
addresses and all other information required of a
single applicant in paragraph (b) above.
8-30-93
$10.00 for ~ days
plus $2.00 per day after
third day
Limited to Ten Consecutive Days
Only Four Per Year to any Organization
CITY OF MOUND
TEMPORARY ON-SALE NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR PERMIT
· ' ' ~4 ~~ (LK~C ~ Chairman
Organization. ~ ~ or Title:
Address: ~J~~~,_ ~ ~ Address:
Phone No.: ~7~--/~ Home Phone:
Work Phone:
Sectio~ 810.10, Sulxl. Z. ~tability Insurance. (a) Pri~' to the issuarx:e of ~ ~r tic,se, the a~ticant shall
~trate pr~f of fi~iat r~tbility with r~ard to ttabiJi~ Im~ ~ ~i~ota Stat~ S~tim
~.~1 to the City Clerk ~ to the C~issi~r of ~[tc Safety es a c~iti~ of the issu~e or re~at of his
Sleeve. Pr~f of fi~iat r~ibitity shaft ~ gt~n ~ fiti~ a certificate that there is tn eff~t ~ in-
sura~e ~[tcy or ~[ providi~ the elni~ coverers for dr~ ~ li~itity as r~ir~ ~ Mi~sota Statutes,
~ti~ ~OA.&~, S~ivtsi~ 1. it !~ the intent of this secti~ to r~ire the aini~ im~e c~erag~ a~
~ts r~ir~ ~ Nimota law.
Name of Insurance Co.: ~~C~.~.~(
Amount of Coverage: // b O~L}
Sectio~ 810:10. Sul~l. 1. Al~itcation For~. In the case of a~y application for
tou sate and cons~pti~ of I~r ~x~ public land or public school lands, the al~ticant shalL, prior to issuance of
such license, file the uritte~ conser~t of the outer of such tends to such use of its tac~b.
Date Applicant's
Signat~
Minnesota Lawful C, aml)llng
Application for Authorization for
Exemption from Lawful Gambling License
FOR BOARD USE ONLY
FEE CHK
INIT .. DATE
/ /__
Cheek the box below which Indicate, your type of organization
[] Fraternal
[] Veter.~
Gambling Site
Check the box that indicat~ your preof of nonlxelit
status and attach · copy of the proof to the .p~iicalloa.
[] iRS designation
[] Certification of good stencing from Ihe Minnesote
Secretary of State's office
~[ Affiliate of parent nonprofit o,ganizatim (cha~
Name ol si· where &c~/ w~l take
~ ~~ -
Bingo []
Raffles
Paddlewheels
Pull-tabs J~
I declare all information submitted to the
Gambling Control Board is true, accurate,
and complete.
Local Unit of Governdlent Acknowledgment
S,~e z~ ~ J /C°umY .
Financial Report
Co~t c~ Prizm 1~4 Prollt
MarkM Value of Pflzll
Oncludlng Dgmltk~l
and cash)
//
I declare all financial ir~ormalio~ submllled lo the Gambing ConlrM
Board Is Imf), a~curate. ~ complMe.
Chief Executive Officer's Stgnatum Date
I here mceh~d · ~ M this N3pIcallo~ This appilcelloa wll be reviewed by the G,unbllng Control Boa~l and will become effective 30 (lays lmm the dale et
recelpl by Ih· cly o( coullly, unless the local unl of govemmenl passes · resoMIon Io spedficaJly prohlbl Ih· &c~lv#y. A copy ol Ihal resoluliol3 nlust be W
by lhe Gambing Conlrol Bcerd within 30 days of the date flied In be·ow. Clles ol the first class heve 60 days In which to ~saliow Ih· acUv#y.
Cay (x Cmmly Township
Township name
Cay of munly nam~
Th~ f~ ~11 ~ ~de avail~le
in a~ernat~e fo~t (i.e. large
print, br~) upon request.
Signature ol person mceMng application
Tilt· Dale Received
Mall with $25 permit fee and copy of
proof of nonprofit status to:
Gambling Control Board
1711 W. County Rd. B. St·. 300 S.
Roseville. MN 55113
Township is
[] organized
[] unorganized*
[] unincorporated*
* Attach letter
White - Original
Yellow - Board returns to
Organization to complete
shaded areas
CITY of ,X,,IOUND
534! !/z-h'O00 ~CA2
FA~, ~'2,4~2 ~62~
January 11, 1994
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
ED SHUKLE, CITY NANAGER
TENTATIVE SETTLF~IENT WITH TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 -
MAINTENANCE UNIT
Since this past fall, we have been negotiating with the City's
labor unions for new contracts beginning January 1, 1994. The
Police Sergeants and Police Patrol contracts are still in
negotiations. However, the City's Maintenance Unit has agreed to
and ratified a tentative settlement for 1994 and 1995. The
following is an outline of the settlement which I am recommending
to you for approval effective January 1, 1994 and ending December
31, 1995:
ARTICLE VI.
EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
6.4
STEP
(Last Sentence) Substitute "Bureau of
Mediation Services" for "Public
Employment Relations Board." If the PERB
begins operating in the future, the
reference will revert back to the "Public
Employment Relations Board".
ARTICLE XX.
INSUI~.NCE
20.1
Replace current language with the following:
The Employer agrees to pay the full premium for the
employee only hospitalization/major medical insurance for
each full-time employee after thirty (30) days of
continuous employment. The Employer agrees to contribute
up to $365.00 per month in 1994 and up to $375.00 per
month in 1995 toward the cost of family coverage after
thirty (30) days of continuous employment for each full-
printed on recycled paper
Page 2
time employee who elects family coverage under this
agreement. Any additional costs for such family coverage
shall be paid by the employee through payroll deduction.
In no event shall the Employer's contribution exceed the
actual cost of the coverage selected by the employee.
ARTICLE XXIV.
SEVERANCE PAY
24.3
(New) An employee who is discharged from employment for
just cause shall not be entitled to severance pay under
this Article.
ARTICLE XXX.
WAGES
Maintenanoe Person
01/01/94
01/01/95
2.0% increase
2.0% increase
Unit Supervisors
Water, Sewer & Streets
Parks
12/31/93
01/01/94
01/01/95
$20.68
2.0% increase
2.0% increase
$19.52
2.0% increase
2.0% increase
ARTICLE XXXII.
NON-DISCRIMINATION
32.1
Neither the Employer nor the Union shall discriminate
against any employee because of Union membership or
because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin,
sex, marital status, status with regard to public
assistance, membership or activity in local commission,
disability, sexual orientation, or age.
32.2
The Employer will take such actions as are necessary to
comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act in order
to reasonably accommodate an employee. When a reasonable
accommodation is required or requested, the Employer will
meet and discuss reasonable accommodation options with
the employee and the Union before the Employer takes
action.
ARTICLE XXXIII.
DURATION (Renumbered)
This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 1994 and shall
continue in full force and effect until December 31, 1995.
RESOLUTION NO. 94 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MOUND AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320,
MAINTENANCE PERSONS AND UNIT SUPERVISORS
FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1994 THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 1995.
WHEREAS, the City of Mound and Teamsters Local #320,
Maintenance Persons and Unit Supervisors have gone through the
collective bargaining process and negotiated a labor contract for
January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995; and
WHEREAS, both sides have worked a final agreement which
is acceptable to both the City's negotiators and the bargaining
units negotiators.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mound and
Teamsters Local #320 Maintenance Persons and Unit Supervisors have
reached a settlement on January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1995
contract per a Tentative Agreement as outlined in a memo dated
January 11, 1994, attached hereto and made a part thereof.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember ·
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
06-Jan-94
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
DECEMBER FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT
INVESTMENTS
The following is the December investment activity:
aalancei~ ~ December 1~ !~3
$5,475,343
Bought:
Money Market 4M 250,000
CP 3.31 Dain Bosworth 547,373
CP 3.33 Dain Bosworth 297,030
CP 3.34 Dain Bosworth 98,799
Inst Govt Inc Piper - Income Reinvested N/A
Money Market 4M - Income Reinvested 1,932
Matured:
Money Market 4M (TO CHECKING ACCT.) (50,000)
Balance: December 31, 1993
$6,620,477
During the month of December we prepared for the closing of the year in the
Finance Department. Changes were implemented in the Payroll System to conform to
the new regulations from the IRS, the State, and PERA. W-2s will be out soon.
The new rates for water and sewer, as approved by the council, are now in
place and a 5% overall increase will be reflected starting with the next billing.
It is again that time of the year when we finalize the year's activity,
summarize and analyze the numbers and prepare for the audit.
01 ~04~94
of Mound
Monthly Report
Utilities
Month of: December 1993
Utility-g3
Residential
Commercial
Total
No. of Customers:
Water
Sewer
Water Used:
(in 1,000 gallons)
1,066
1,070
16,248
121
121
4,515
1,187
1,191
20,763
Billing:
Water
Sewer
Recycle
Total
$23,328
$40,395
$3.163
$66,886
$4,648
$11,687
$19
$16,354
27,976
52,082
3,182
83,24Q
Payments:
Water
Sewer
Recycle
Total
$22,116
$35,211
$2,911
$60,238
$4,200
$10,321
$18
$14,539_
26,316
45,532
2,929
~74,777
January 3, 1994
To:
From:
Subject:
Ed Shulke
City Manager
Greg Skinner
Public Works
December Activity Report
Street Department
First, it was a great December. There was very little snow.
We only had to pushed and sanded a few times. The budget
hearing went great. Really like the new format. Lets do it
again next year.
I have had talks with Bob Hunter from the Dept of Corrections
regarding the painting of the Public Works and Parks
Department buildings. Bob handles a program called Sentencing
To Service (STS). These are low risk offenders that work off
part of their sentence. They will be starting here on January
14, 1994. We hope that this can be completed in 3 weeks.
Water Department
The date for the bid opening for the Water Meter Project will
be January 5, 1994. I am looking for a late February or early
March start date.
We worked Christmas day on a water main break in Island Park.
This was the only break in December.
! will be picking up the new vehicle on January 3rd. This
will plow the sidewalks.
Sewer Department
We have been experiencing some grease buildup in our sewer
line on Commerce Blvd. at C-5 L.S. We traced the cause back
to the Happy Gardens Restaurant. The Building Inspector,
Pluming Inspector and myself met with the owners and
inspected the grease trap. We found that is not being
properly maintained. We have given the owners 120 days to
make some adjustments in the system and instructions on how
to maintain the grease trap.
One of our L.S. the we upgraded in 1991 has been give us fits
for the last m°nth. E-1 L.S. at Mound Bay Park has been seem
to have a mind of it's own. We have had Tri-State out twice
and we still our not sure if we have corrected the problem.
We may have to contact NSP request that they chart the flow
of electricity. We feel that there may be inconsistent
voltage caused by a bad transformer.
I ! I 11 ,
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DE?ARIMENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA
FOR MONTH OF D~FMBKR1993
FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE
L~/[3 12/20 14~ ~ R1RS RA/E
1 jEFF AN'DKR~qFN X X 2 19.~
2 G~G ANDERSON X X 2 19.~ ~ 6.~ 2~.~
3 J~Y B~B X X 2 lq.~
4 P~ ~B X X 2
5 DAVID ~ X X 2
6 ~ BRYCE ~ X 2 lq.~ ~8 6.5~ 747.~
tO ST~ COLLINS X X 2 19.m
ti ~XVY m~Z X X 2 19.m 24 6.m 144.~
12 S~%Z ERI~N X X 2 19.~ 36 6.25 Z25,~
13 P}SL FISK X X 2 19.~ 20 6.~ 120.~
14 D~N G~Y X X 2 19.~ 44 6.~ 2~.~
15 ~ G~Y X X 2 19.~ 32 6.~ 192.~
16 Ck&IG ~ ~) X 1 9.~ 24 6.~ 144.~
17 P~% ~Y X X 2 19.~ 27 6.~ 162.~
18 B~ ~t~N X X 2 19.~ 38 6.~ 228.~
19 R~ b~ X X 2 19.~ 41 6.~ 246.~
20 J~ ~S X X 2 19.~ 32 6.~ 192.~
21 JA~ N~N X X 2 19.~ 36 6.~ 216.~
22 ~V ~ X X 2 19.~ 38 6.~ 228.~
23 B~ NIC~1 E X 1 9.50 21 6.~ 126.~
24 G~ P~ X X 2 19.~ 28 6.~ 168.~
25 MIKE P~ X X 2 19.~ ~ 6.~ 180.~
26 TIM P~.I X X 2 19.~ 42 6.~ 252.~
27 GR~ PED~ X X 2 19.~ 35 6.~ 210.~
28 C~IS ~ X X 2 19.~ 33 6.~ 198.~
29 ~ ~S~SS~ X X 2 19.~ 23 6.~ 138.~
~ MIKE SAVAGE X X 2 19.~ ~ 6.~ 1~.~
31 K~ SIP~L X X 2 19.~ 40 6.~ 240.~
32 R~ S~ X X 2 19.~ 19 6.~ 114.~
33 T~[ ~ X X 2 '19.~ 31 6.~ 186.~
~ ED V~ " X X 2 19.~ 43 6.~ 258.~
~ RICK ~ X X 2 19.~ 36 6.~ 216.~
~ TIM WILLIAMS X X 2 19.~ 28 6.~ 168.~
37 D~%~ W~ X X 2 19.~ 36 6.~ 216.~
~ 37 71
85 92% 177% 674.50 1202 ~ 7,240.~
177% ~lg 674.50
~ 1.167.~
~ 9.~1.~
RE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
~ O~ DECEMBH2R 1993
~K). OF C,~LS 50 32 ~3 ~6 ...
FI~ 7 5 117
HOUND ~ 20 10 237 165
FI~ 0 0 9 13
M~NNEZONKA SEAC~
~ ~ .,, p,, 4 6
FI~ 3 5 31 16
MINNETRISTA
~~ Z ~ 38 40
Fr~m 1 Z 28 24
ORONO
~~ 2 0 27 21
FI~ O 0 4 3
SHOREWOOD
FI~ 7 ~ 32 33
SPRING PARK
~.~ ~ ~ 67 56
--- F~ 1 0 6 4
MUTUAL AID
~~ I 0 3 O ....
~0~AL F~RE CALLS ~9 ~5 225
~O~AL ENERGENCY CALLS 31 ~7 ~ 289
~C~ 1 ~ 9
~~ n ~ ,n 1
~s ~ ~~Js ] ~ 6~ 38
F~E ~ / F~ ~ 6 5 72 53
~. OF ~ FI~ ~5~. q3 2633 ~789
- MOUND ~G~ 3q7, 7~ 4~7 31~
~ ~aq ~ 11 70~ 5979
FI~ n O. ~ , ~16 .,
- MTKA BEACH ~~ ~7 O 97 115
~ 27 0 196 331
FI~ 5g 101 592 429
- M'TRISTA ~ ~ . 45 695 750
~ ,~ 146 1287 1179
FI~ ~ 50 628 469
- ORONO ~G~ ~ 0 550 457
~ ~ ~ 1178 9~
F~ o o ~ 1
- SHOREWOOD ~G~ 0 ~ 71
~ 0 ~ 1)1 , 150
FI~ ] 3q 5] 645 683
- Sp. PARK ~~ ]Z9 55 1349
~ ~ 1 ~ 1 qq4 1847
F~ ~ p 222 220
- ~ ~D ~G~ 11 0 4~ 0
~ ~ 0 26~ 220
TOTAL DRILL HOURS 177k 152~ 1955 2040
TOTAL FIRE HOURS 5~ 2q5 4q25 4q~
TOTAL EMERGENCY HOURS 6~ 348 7224 5702
~ FIRE & ~G~ ~ 1202 643 1~_14q 10_642
~UTUAL AID RECEIVED 0 0 2
MUTUAb AXD ~XVXN 2 O 9 4
DRILL REPORT
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
Date
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of fires
Pre-plan and Inspections
Tools and Apparatus Identify
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First Aid and Rescue Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
~gmper Operations
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural/Propane Gas Demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliances
Hours Training Paid :
~ Excused
X Unexecused
0 Present / Not Paid
laneous :
PERSONNEL
~//~J.Andersen
~G.Anderson
~,,~ J.Babb
P.Babb
D.Boyd
~D.Bryce
~¥~___S.Bryce
D.Carlson
__~ J.Casey
S.Collins
R Englehart
S~Erlckson
~P.Flsk
~ D.Grady
~K.Grady
C.Henderson
P.Henry
2~B.Landsman
~--~-~R.Marschke
~J.Na~us
~ J.Nelson
~ M.Nelson
~ B.N~ccum
~---~G.Palm
~M.Palm
~T.Palm
~--~ G.Pederson
C.Pounder
Rassmusen
2Savage
~ ~ ~.Sipprell
~R.Stallman
,T.Swenson
E.Vanecek
R.Wllliams
T.Williams
2~D.Woytcke
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
DRILL REPORT
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of fires
Pre-plan and inspections
Tools and Apparatus IdentifY
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
F~lms
First Aid and Rescue Operation
Use of self-Conta~ned Masks
Pumper Operations
Fire Streams & Fr~ction Loss .
House Burnings
Natural/Propane Gas Demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliances
Hours Training Paid :
~ Excused
X Unexecused
O Present / Not Pa~d
PERSONNEL
~P.Fisk ~T.Palm
~_J.Andersen ~D.Grady ~_G.Pederson
~_~z~G.Anderson ~zK.Grady _~A~C.Pounder
~ff._J.Babb ~C.Henderson ~__T.Rassmusen
P.Henry
~P~Babb ~B.Landsman~ ~M.Savage
D Boyd ~F~R.Marschke ~ ~K.Sipprell
~D Bryce ~R.Stallman
~S.Bryce ~J.Nafus ~T.Swenson
~D.Carlson ~J.Nelson~
E.Vanecek~
~M.Nelson ~R.Williams
~ J.Casey ~
~ S.Colllns B.Niccum ~V~T.WIlilams
G.Paim
~ R.Englehart ~D.Woytcke
~~S.Erl .,, ,~
%5 ~kson ~M.Paim
CITY of 'IOUNI)
January 6, 1994
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK
DECEMBER 1993, MONTHLY REPORT
There was one regular meeting in December with agendas, minutes and
resolutions to prepare. Then there was the Budget Hearing and the
Special Emergency Meeting.
I prepared the renewal notices for the licenses that will be
expiring at the end of February. I have all the licenses scheduled
on the computer for certain dates and specific meetings.
The Cemetery Map was updated with all the changes that took place
in 1993.
I entered all the minutes from 1993 into the Clerk's Index Program
on my computer. This really works slick when you need to find
something later, just a few key strokes and you have the
information.
New files were made for 1994.
I am continuing to work on the Ordinance Book and enter it into the
com~uter when time allows. I'm getting close to completion. Theis
will make it much easier to update in the future.
fc
printed on recFcled p;~per
CITY of MOUND
January 3, 1994
TO: MAYOR, CITY ~%GER ~D CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR OPERATIONS MANAGER .
SUBJECT: DECEMBER 1993 MONTHLY REPORT
The year is finally over and I am eager to let you know the
results. However, this is a monthly report and all my English
Literature teachers always taught me to stick to the subject
matter. Don't stray. So you will have to be kept in suspense for
a month or two.
December's gross sales were the second best sales in any month
that we've ever had doing slightly under $150,000. The best month
ever was July of 1993, when we did just over $154,000. In 1992,
December's sales were almost $145,000. In that year we had an
extra Saturday business day. This year Christmas fell on a
Saturday and we had to be closed. So not only were we up over last
year, but we did so with a $7000 handicap. Christmas Eve of this
year saw sales nudge over the $17,000 figure and New Year's Eve
sales were just under the $19,000 mark. Customers for the month
were up only a hundred over last December, but keep in mind that we
lost a Saturday.
Did you see our Holiday Sale that we advertised on the back
page of "The Laker" for two consecutive weeks over the holiday
season? It was not my best effort I must admit, but it still got
results. People, who I have never seen before in our store,
commented that they saw the ad and had to check it out.
Well, now I can relax some except for the fact there is
inventory extension ahead of me. Heh, would you ever consider
having the holiday city party after December 31st?
JK:ls
printed on recycled paper
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
i612) 4~2-0600
FAX f6'~2 472-0620
PARKS DEPARTMENT
DECEMBER 1993 MONTI-H,Y REPORT
Parks
The weather was warm until Christmas vacation, so the ice rinks are
behind schedule, but we hope to make up for it now that the weather is
colder. The lights for the rinks have been repaired, we need to have
this done each year because of vandalism.
Docks
Ail permits are complete for the riprapping projects for this winter.
We will riprap 100 lineal feet on Devon Commons and 175 lineal feet off
Three Points Blvd. This work should be done in February with weather
permitting. Again, because this work is done over the ice we have to
leave the determination of safe ice conditions up to the contractor, we
do not want to be responsible for equipment falling through the ice.
Ail 1994 Dock License Applications were mailed on the last working day
in 1993.
Trees
The only trees removed were in preparation for the riprapping to be done
off of Three Point Blvd. There were trees that were affected by erosion
and were lying in the water.
Three
trees
were
marked
on private property and were removed by the
owner.
JF:pj
CITY OF MOUND
53,41 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX (612) 472-0620
MEMORI~IDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
January 4, 1994
city Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff
Jon Sutherland, Building official ~ ~-
DECEMBER 1993 MONTHLY REPORT
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
In December there were 12 building permits issued, 3 of which were
for new dwellings, and that gives us a total of 19 new homes this
year, versus 27 in 1992. Valuation for 1993 tops out at
$4,220,227, down about 14 percent from 1992.
There were 19 plumbing, mechanical, and miscellaneous permits
issued for a total number of permits issued at 31 for December, and
633 for the year.
PLANNING & ZONING
Last year at this time we were considering a Planned Development
Area (PDA) for Teal Pointe in the Whipple Addition, and that
consideration is still on-going and should come to a conclusion by
the Council soon. Another PDA for Pelican Point is now being
proposed as a sketch plan. Several zoning requests were processed
this month.
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER (CSO) ACTIVITIES
Approximately 10 letters went out in response to exterior storage
complaints and inspection activities in December. A total number
of derelict warning tags, tows, and complaints is within the police
report. For the year, 13 commercial vehicle warnings and two
citations were issued; compliance has been achieved with both
citations. 116 derelict automobile warnings were issued and
resolved with an additional dozen citations and vehicles towed.
December 1993 Monthly Report
Planning & Inspections
Page 2
RENTAL COMPLAINTS
NO complaints were processed in December. Approximately 12
complaints have been received and resolved since the adoption of
the ordinance, and there has not been any significant problems
noted by rental owners in compliance with our rental regulations.
JS:pj
C~ty ol Mound
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
Month: r~EC~MBER Year: 1993
THIS MONTH YEaR TO D~TE
ION I PEI~41T~ I UNITS VALUATION I UNITS VALUATION
S~GLE F~Y A~ACHED
~0 F~Y ~ DUPL~
MULT~LE Y~Y ~ OR MO~ UN~S~
~s~ Hsd. ~E~ I MOTE~)
s~ 3 3 333,716 19 1,986,680
w CONSTRUCTION
O~mC~ t ~O~{ONAL
~DU~
PU~! ~ / $CH~
~H~:
~S;D~Z~ ; ~S V~L~T~O, ~ P~S V~L~;~ON
XD~;;O~SZ~;~;O~S
D~ACH;D ~CC~SO~Y SU~LD~G; 2 [ 207,039
DEC~ ~ 2 120,403
s~o ~ 3 20,889
M~SCEL~EOUS ~ODEL 8 33,070 189 808,810
$~ 9 39,070 292 I ,918,586
~~Io~ I P~ V~UA~N I P~S VALUATION
-CO~ERC~ ~ ~A~ I I 51,745
OFFICE / ~OF~SlONAL [ 75,000
~DUS~L ~ 130,766
~L~ ~ ~H~ I 57 ,~50
D~ACH~D ACC~SORY aU~D~OS
$~ 18 316,961
D~HO~I~ION$ I P~ I UN~S VALUA~ON I PERM.S VALUATION
R~iDE~ D~LL~G$ 3
D~ACHED ACC~SORY BUnD[NOS 2
~ D~O~Z~ZON~ 7
~O~R$ION~/C~O~ O~ U~ I P~ I UNffS VALUATION I PE~S VALUATION
~OM~:
~ CO~RSIONS
I P~$ I UN~S VALUA~N I UN~ VALUATION
~S
TOT~ ~2 ~ 322,zoe . ~9 ~,220,22~
336
~I~ ~o~ ~ MO~ YE~-TO-DATE
· BUdDha 12 335
~NC~ · ~A~G WAL~ 0 39
SIGNS I 21
PL~B~O 7 113
~~ & 76
G~D~O 0 9
3~ 633
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Lake Access Committee
Agenda
7:00 pm, Monday, January 10, 1994
LMCD Conference Rm 160, Norwest Bank Bldg.
900 E. Wayzata Blvd.,, Wayzata
(Handicapped access, west entrance, Wayzata Blvd.)
RECEIYEB 7
Report of the 1992 Lake Access Task Force Study,
final draft presentations (per individual draft items
being provided for review) on:
Cover (to be prepared -- incorporate Lake Zone Map)
Inside Cover -- Roster of Task Force spokespersons,
agency staff
a. Executive Summary )
b. Introduction ) to be incorporated into
c. Priority Assignments ) one contiguous report
d. Conclusions )
e. Acknowledgments )
Appendix:
l) Public Access Inventory & footnotes
2) Parking Standards
3) Model Parking Agreement & Checklist
4) Access Site Evaluation Criteria
5) Proceedings Sun, nary
6) Map of Existing Public Access Sites &
Commercial Marinas (not included in this draft)
7) DNR Landowners Bill of Rights " " " )
2. Recommendation to the board for final adoption;
Establish date for Lake Access Task Force to consider
final adoption;
Additional business, progress reports on:
a. Agreements with cities;
b. Maxwell Bay access site;
c. Car/trailer parking space lease arrangements with
commercial marinas;
d. Other reports;
5. Adjournment
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
~GENDA RECEIVES
Monday, January 10, 1994, 5:30 PM
LMCD office, Norwest Bank Building
900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Wayzata
(Elevator access for Handicapped;
use west entrance on Wayzata Blvd.)
lgg
Lakeshore lighting subcommittee; informational report by
Tom Line, electrical engineer
Progress on ,,responsible wake" education brochure-staff
report
Special Event Definition - resubmission of 11/17/93 memo
for committee recommendation
Quiet Waters Areas - discussion on possible new areas to
be designated quiet waters/no wake zones
Report on public information signs addressing vehicle
operation within 150' shorezone
6. Review liquor license fees
1994 Save the Lake Recognition Banquet - recommendations
for recipient of Water Patrol Special Deputy Award
Water Patrol Report
A. Monthly Activity Report (handout)
9. Additional business
1/4/94
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
900 E. Wmyza~a Blvd., Surge 160, Wayzata, [-~N 55391
473-7033
L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE
JANUARY, 1994
Saturday
Monday
Wednesday
Monday
Friday
Wednesday
Friday
10
12
17
21
28
Water ~tructures Conmlittee
7:90 am, ~135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata
Lake U~e & Recreation Committee
5:30 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata
Lske Access Committee
7:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata
Administrative Committee
7:00 pm, LMCD Ofice, Wayzata
Martin Luther King Jr. Day
Office Closed
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
8:30 sm, #135 Norwe~t Bank Bldg, Wayzata
LMCD Board of Directors Regular Meeting
7:30 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall
Mayors Quarterly Meetin~
7:00 am, LaFayette Club
WP :mL~jO4j~d
MINUTES OF A MEE G OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 13, 1993
were: chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners Geoff M%cga~l,
Thos~ ~en% ~:,~ ,,A.. Jerry Clapsaddle, Mark ~anus~ an~ "5~
Frank wellana, s~xx .u~, ~
Johnson, City Council Representative Liz Jensen, City Planner ~arn
Koegler, Building official Jon Sutherland and Secretary Peggy
James. Commissioner Michael Mueller was absent and excused.
The following people were also in attendance: Catherine reit,
James Veit, Vern Veit, Dave W. Olson, Bob Doppelhammer, Barry
Harpestad, William H. Hennemuth, Nancy Ketcher, Don Ketcher, Carol
Miletti, David C. Hanson, Bob Boyer, John Boyer, and John
Blumentrit.
The Planning Commission Minutes of November 22, 1993 were presented
for approval.
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Voss to approve tho
Planning commission Minutes of November 22, 1993 as
written. Motion carried unanimously.
~UIST'S RAVENSWOOu tau
FOR ~DDITION~.
Building official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant's revised
request for a variance to construct an addition to the existing
nonconforming dwelling. The proposed addition will be conforming
to all setback requirements and plans have been incorporated to
allow for a future garage addition.
staff recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
amended request for construction of an addition as shown on the
survey revised 11-30-93, and recommends recognition of the existing
onconforming setbacks, resulting in a 9.6' front yard setback
n - - - -, --de yard setback variance. This amended
variance ana a af~_.~- ,_~__~A.~4n, to the zoning ordinance and
osal for an a~aitlon ~ uu~-,,,~
prop ...... :~ 4m~rovement to the property.
represents a SUDS~anu~ax ~ ~
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Michael to recommend
approval of the variance request as recommended by staff.
Motion carried unanimously-
This case will be heard by the City Council on December 14, 1993.
~ J]%M - _ --_ .... -"~2. EASEMENT VACATION
BLOCK I LOST LAKE PID 24 1117 z% z~ vv~
IPUBLIC HEARING).
Jon Sutherland, Building official, reviewed the City Engineer's
recommendation for vacation of a portion of the drainage easement
over the subject property, as follows:
Planning Commission Minutes
December 13, 1993
"This easement was created for construction of a
sedimentation pond when the property was platted. The
pond actually constructed did'nOt cover the entire area
described by the easement. Therefore, the portion
requested to be vacated appears to be unnecessary as a
drainage easement; however, our concern is that will be
required of the city in the future regarding storm water
management. It's possible this pond may need to be
enlarged, in which case some or all of the easement may
be required."
The Public Works and Parks Department also recommended denial of
the vacation as requested.
The Commission clarified with the applicant why they are requesting
this vacation. It was explained that the applicant would like to
construct a driveway on the easement in order to access a garage,
the garage they propose would have both an upper and lower level
with one being accessed from the front and the other from the side
which is why they would need the driveway over the subject
easement. It was clarified that the paved driveway is proposed to
abut the walkway easement.
Jensen received confirmation from the Building Official that the
house can be constructed right up to the easement. Jensen further
commented that Storm water Management is a big issue and that the
Planning Commission should be sensitive to this issue.
Chair Meyer opened the public hearing.
Vern Veit, original developer of the Lost Lake Subdivision, spoke
on behalf of the applicants, and explained that the portion of the
easement requested to be vacated is only a small portion of the
entire easement which continues north into Lot 17.
Mr. reit shared some figures computed by Mark Gronberg, surveyor,
regarding the amount of water storage that is needed in this area
based on the 100 year flood. He stated that the easement is
grossly oversized and the reason the easement line was drawn there
is because it was a survey line. He further explained that the
elevations of the easement proposed to be vacated are higher than
the balance of the easement and the area is too high to use as a
drainage area. The elevation of the easement south of the walkway
is 936. He also noted that the City of Mound owns a large portion
of land to the west where the elevation ranges between 929.4 and
931.5. The elevations within this portion of the easement are
above the street and runoff would have to be pumped into this area
if it were to be used for drainage.
Jensen questioned the lot area of Lot 18; it was unknown. Hanus
questioned the availability of a survey for the lot to the north,
Sutherland confirmed that one should be on file.
Planning commission Minutes
December 13, 1993
Vern Veit commented that the city of Mound already owns an abundant
amount of land to the west which would accommodate drainage
requirements. It was noted that no drainage comes in from Bartlett
Blvd. as Lost Lake Road was raised so water will not flow into this
development.
Dave Olson of 2582 Lost Lake Road suggested that if the easement is
allowed to be vacated that the walkway, which he uses to access
Lost Lake Park and his dock site, be moved to the north so they are
not affected by the proximity of the proposed driveway.
Staff's rationale for it's recommendation was discussed and it was
noted that the City is in favor of retaining the drainage easement
due to impending storm water management regulations.
chair Meyer suspended the public hearing.
The Commission further discussed the issue. Hanus commented that
he is in favor of retaining easements in this area, however, he is
not convinced that the entire area is needed and he would like to
the applicant further research to provide more
see staff o? . . _ th- and the property to the
elevations, inclua~ng. ~h~}~ ~ ~l~°rroo~ to double or triple the
west. Meyer agreed, lz ~ne~ ~= ~-.~
size of the pond towards the north, he may consider approval of the
vacation.
The applicant expressed a concern about having a pond adjacent to
her basement.
Voss commented that maybe it would be beneficial for the applicant
to get organized and work with the City on potential storm water
management needs, and allow the City Engineer more time to collect
information. Johnson agreed that it would be beneficial for the
City Engineer to review the elevations of the balance of the
easement and reassess his recommendation.
OH made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Hanus, to table
MOTI ....... ~.~,,m~v 10- 1994 Planning
this reqUeSt un~ u~ ~ ..... ~ - . .
commission Meeting, and still have the Cxt¥ Counoxl hold
their public hearing on Jenuar~ 11, 1994. More
ation is to be supplied relating to Lot 17, the
infor? ....... ~ ~h- land availabilit~ to the west,
pa~ce - ~,--- ~.. ~- City on anticipations of the
an~ P ........... ~ =lan. Motion carried 5 to 3.
storm ......... .. Meyer, Clapsaddle, Mueller~
Those xn xavo~ ----- - and weilana
~ohnson, Voss, and Hanus. Michael, ~ensen,
opposed.
Weiland commented that he feels adequate information was submitted
and a vote should have been taken. Jensen commented that we have
an existing easement and once it is gone you cannot get it back.
Michael feels that Cameron saw enough information to base his
decision and he agrees with it. Weiland agreed with both Sensen
and Michael.
3
Planning Commission Minutes
!
December 13, 1993
Hanus commented that he is not convinced that the City Engineer's
recommendation was based on consideration of the entire easement,
he does not believe that it is possible that the entire easement,
both lots, could potentially be used for a pond, he does not
believe that size of a lake would be put in that neighborhood.
The City Dlanner suggested %ha% Mr. Velt ~hare the aralnage
calculations by his surveyor with the City Engineer.
CASE ~93-059: OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CHURCH, 2385 COMN~CE BLVD.,
LOTS $, 7t 8 & 9, AUDITORS SUBD. ~167t LOTS 1~ 2~ & 3~ GUILFORD~
REARR. OF MOUND BAY P/~RK~ PID ~14-117-24 44 0005. LOT COVERAGE
V2%RIANCE FOR ADDITION.
city Planner, Mark Koegler, explained to the Planning Commission
that churches are permitted uses in the B-1 district and schools
are conditional uses in the B-1. The proposed activity center has
been interpreted by staff to be a "church" expansion, therefore a
conditional use permit is not required.
Shoreline provisions of the Mound Shoreland Ordinance states that,
"impervious coverage in lots in the business and industrial zones
shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. In business
industrial zones that are included within areas covered by an
approved storm water management plan, impervious cover shall not
exceed 75 percent of the total lot area. At the present time,
Mound does not have a storm water management plan in place,
however, the City is currently having initial discussion on the
preparation of such a plan.
At present, impervious portions of the church site total 54.3%.
With the addition of the Activity Center, the amount of hard cover
will rise to 57.4%, a 3.1% increase.
Koegler noted that only roof drainage will be increased which is
considered relatively clean since it does not contain the oils,
salts and particulates that result from parking lot drainage.
Additionally, where possible, storm water is being drained over
grass areas prior to collection in the storm sewer system.
Staff recommended approval of the variance request which results in
a 3.1% increase in the total amount of impervious surface, subject
to the church obtaining required approvals and permits from
Hennepin County. The proposed church expansion represents a
reasonable use of the property, and given tight site conditions,
reasonable efforts have been made to accommodate additional storm
water.
When the City eventually adopts a .storm water management plan, the
church, even with the new expansion, will be well under the maximum
threshold of 75% impervious cover.
Planning Commission Minutes
December 13, 1993
Meyer questioned if the expansion will affect the already tight
parking problem. Koegler commented that the addition will not
warrant increased parking needs due to the times it will be
utilized.
Johnson commented that he has a concern due to the issues in the
previous case where the emphasis was to reduce the amount of runoff
into Lost Lake, and now this request, if approved, will increase
the runoff into Lost Lake.
ION made by Hanus, seconded by Voss to recommend
MOT ......... = .... +~ imnervious surface to
~r~ .... ~ ....~ e--,-ansion as recommenaed Dy scag~.
,,o.. i, ,,,o, ..,.. ,.,.,.
~:nsen, ross, Hanus, and Michael. clapsaddle and Johnson
opposed.
This case will be reviewed by the City council on January 11, 1994.
SECTION 23 ~OWNSHIP 117 RANGE 24 PID 23-117-24 22 0005. STREET
FRONTAGE VARIANCE FOR ADDITION.
Building official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant's request
for a variance to recognize the existing nonconforming street
frontage in order to construct a fully conforming garage. This
in 1988 to allow
property received a variance to lot frontage
construction of the existing dwelling (note Resolution #88-109.
staff recommended approval as this request is conforming to all
other respects of the Zoning ordinance and is a reasonable use of
the property.
MOTION made by Voss, seconded by Wsiland to recommend
approval of the variance request as recommended by staff.
Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on December 14, 1993.
PELICAN POINT PHELPS ISLAND P~K 1ST DIVISION PID 19-117 23 31
0~067, 0003. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW.
city Planner, Mark Koegler, briefly reviewed the intent of the
request for a Sketch Plan Review by Boyer Building Corporation to
develop the ,,Pelican Point" property. Koegler explained that this
request can be processed as a Planned Development Area (PDA).
Koegler recognized a letter received from the Department of Natural
Resources today regarding the proposed development.
5
Planning Commission Minutes
December 13, 1993
Mr. John Blumentrit, Mr. Bob Boyer, and Mr. John Boyer, were
introduced to the Commission as being representatives for Boyer
Building Corporation. Visual aids were displayed. John Blumentrit
explained the proposed development which includes 40 residential
units, or 20 twin homes, with driveway access off a 20 foot wide
private road system.
Marketability of the proposed development was reviewed. The
development is being geared towards the over-fifty age group. The
units will have approximately 1,700 square feet on the main level.
The campus would be maintained by an association. They are aware
that they will need to address the boat docking issues. The
proposed hardcover is 22 to 25 percent, they are very interested in
preserving the natural site and keep as many trees as possible, a
north woods feel is proposed. An interior pond is proposed to help
with drainage.
It was clarified that there will be 20 feet between each twin home.
The proposed price range of the units is $300,000 to $500,000. The
Commission noted that an official path to the docks should be
established. The possibility of a beach was discussed. Development
on the island was discussed, and it was noted that they would like
to keep the island as pristine as possible.
The Commission was very receptive to the plan, and commented that
it is one of the best proposals they have seen for this area.
Mr. Boyer commented that it is their intent, prior to formal
application to the City for platting, to invite neighbors who
reside within 350 feet of the property to an informal meeting to
receive comments and concerns.
DISCUSSION: CANCELLATION OF DECEMBER 27, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING.
After discussion, Chair Meyer cancelled the December 27, 1993
Planning Commission Meeting.
CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE'S REPORT
Liz Jensen reviewed the November 23, 1993 City Council Minutes and
announced that the December 28, 1993 City Council meeting has been
cancelled.
MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Weiland, to adjourn
the meeting at 9:56 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
6
CITY OF SPRING PARK
SPRING PARK, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 93-21
DEC 2 3 1993
RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT was created pursuant
to MN Laws 1967, Chapter 907, as amended, and could be dissolved by a
required number of cities voting for dissolution, and
WHEREAS, it was requested at a meeting of mayors of the fourteen cities
that each city take a council vote on the possible dissolution of the
LMCD to determine if the required number of cities agrees with the dis-
solution movement, and
WHEREAS, the City of Spring Park determined in discussion that many of
the actions of the LMCD are duplications of other agencies, such as the
DNR, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Hennepin Conservation District,
Hennepin Parks and appears to be a duplication of taxpayer dollars at a
time when government is supposed to find ways to operate more efficiently.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Spring
Park that the LMCD be dissolved and this resolution be taken to the next
Mayor's meeting for further discussion.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRING PARK THIS
DAY OF DECEMBER 1993.
20th
ATTEST'
ADMIN I~TRA ~'~ C'~['ERK/TREASURER
League of Minnesota Cities
3490 Lexington Avenue North
St. Paul, MN 55126
(612) 490-56O0
December 13, 1993
, DEC 1 5
Dear City Manager/Administrator/Clerk:
As many of you have new mayors and/or councilmembers taking
office on January 1, it is important they learn the "how-to's-,
"can-do's", and "can't-do's" involved in running city government.
For an in-depth overview and training session, the League has
scheduled a one-day Conference for Newly Elected Officials. The
conference will be held on Saturday, February 5, at the Sheraton
Inn Midway in.St. Paul. With the complexities city officials
face in personal liability and conflict of interest, the open
meeting law and data practices act, what councils can and cannot
do, personnel and labor relations, planning, budgeting,
THIS CONFERENCE IS A MUST!
Along with a brochure describing the Conference for Newly Elected
Officials is a brochure outlining three pre-conference seminars
offered by Government Training Service (GTS) and Women in City
Government. These programs are conveniently scheduled on Friday,
February 4 at the same hotel.
We encourage your city officials to attend any (or all!) of these
special programs. They include seminars titled "Resolving
Conflicts: Options for Mutual Gain and Enhancing Your City's
Response to Citizens,,I presented by GTS and "Stress Reduction
Through Time Management,, sponsored by Women in City Government.
These seminars would benefit both incumbents and newly elected
officials. The enclosed brochures detail the three sessions.
We would appreciate your assistance in distributing these
brochures to your city officials.
On behalf of the League of Minnesota Cities and Government
Training Service, we send you our very best wishes for the new
year.
~incerely,
/James F. Miller
· Executive Director
League of Minnesota Cities
Executive Director
Government Training Service
Seminars for Elected Officials**
Registration Form
Friday, February 4, 1994
Affiliation
Title
Work Phone ( )
Address
(street)
Number of years in office__
(city) (state) (zip)
City population
Registration options (please check) /
O 1. Resolving Conflicts (lunch included) - $55
2. Enhancing Your City's Response (no lunch) - $45
$. Both sessions above (lunch included) - $80
Payment options (please check one) ,~
O Enclosed is my check (# ) payable to CTS in the amount
orS
O Plea.se bill be at the above address. (A $6 baling charge will be added./
0 4. Stress Reduction Through Time Management - $25
Return this form by January 28 to Government Training Service, Suite 401,480 Cedar St-, St- Paul, MN 55101. (612) 227-7409
or Minnesota toll free (800) 652-9719.
**Presented in conjunction with the League of Minnesota Cities' Newly Elected Conference (February 5).
League of Minnesota Cities
3490 I~min~n Avenue North
St. Paul, MN
(612) 490-5600
R[C'O OEC 5 0 1993
December 22, 1993
TO:
Mayors, Managers, NLC Direct Member Cities
Members, 1993 NLC Policy and Steering Committees
FROM:
Jim Miller, Executive Director
RE: Application for 1994 NLC Steering Committee Appointments
Enclosed is a copy of the NLC application form for appointment to NLC steering
committee positions. In order to serve, it is necessary to complete this form as soon as
possible and submit it to the Center for Policy and Federal Relations at the NLC Office,.
Appointments are made by NLC steering committee chairpersons (who are, in turn, appointed
by NLC President Sharpe James).
Please note that appointments to NLC steering committee positions are made in early January.
Because of the short time remaining for the completion of the appointment process,
please fax applications to NLC at (202) 626-3043. The NLC address is 1301 Pennsylvania
Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004.
Steering committee members must be elected officials from NLC direct member cities.
In addition, it is important that candidates have the support of the city since costs of meeting
attendance must be borne in part by the city. The League reimburses member cities (or
officials of those cities) for all direct expenses for meetings held separately from the N-LC
Congress of Cities and the NLC Congressional-City Conference. (Steering committees have
two meetings in addition to those held in conjunction with NLC conferences.)
Please also send a copy of the application for steering committee appointment to my
attention. The LMC President will recommend to NLC steering committee chairpelsons the
appointment of Minnesota city officials.
The League encoti~ages interested city officials to submit applications; LMC may support
more than one nominee for each steering committee appointment in expectation that two
Minnesota city officials may be appointed to serve on the same committee.
Enclosure
17.2.
APPLICATION FOR STEERING. cOMMITTEE APPOINTIPI£NT$
1994
I am interested in being considered for appointment to the
Steering Committee for 1994. Descriptions of Committees are on the back.
NAME:
TITLE:
ADDRESS..
CITY, STATE, ZIP:
TELEPHONE:
Background information about yourself, including areas of expertise..
(Bios can be attached)
Recommended by..
Name..
City ..
NOTE:
Title..
State..
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS MUST BE CURRENT MEMBERS
OF THE NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CIf'IES.
(OVER)
1')3
DE$CRIffI'ION OF STEERING COMMI'I'rEES:
The Finance, Administration and Intergovernmental Relations (FAIR) Committee deals with
national economic policy, general financial assistance programs, liability insurance,
intergovernmental relations, municipal bonds and capital finance, municipal management, antitrust
issues, citizen participation and civil rights, labor relations and fire policy.
The Energy, Environment and Natural Resources (EENR) Committee is responsible for policy
on air quality, water resources, wastewater treatment, energy, waste management, infrastructure,
urban esthetics, noise control, and disaster relief.
The Community and Economic Development (CED) Committee is responsible for national urban
policy in local economic development, community development and community development block
grants, housing and neighborhood development, federal building, land use, recreation and parks,
and historic preservation.
The Human Development (HD) Committee analyzes and develops policy on such issues as
employment and job training, social security and unemployment insurance, income support
programs, immigration and refugees, health and education, equal opportunity, social services, and
criminal justice.
The Transportation and Communications (T&C) Committee is responsible for policy on public
transit, streets and highways, air transportation, railroads and waterways, and cable television and
telecommunications.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
In early January, NLC's Committees are appointed. Appointments are made by the chair of each
of the Committees. Steering Committees usually meet four times per year: at the Congress of
Cities in 1994, Congressional-City Conference held annually in Washington, D.C., and two other
two-day meetings. One of the latter meetings is traditionally held in Washington, D.C. and the
other meeting elsewhere in the country.
Steering Committees work on priority topics established in March by their corresponding Policy
Committee, and at the two interim meetings study and development policy proposals for
presentation back to the Policy Committee at the Congress of Cities.
The cost of meeting attendance must be borne by the nominee or by their city. Nominees should
have the ability to attend all meetings since active participation of each committee member is
expected.
If you would like to serve, or know of another elected city official who you would like to nominate
to serve on a steering committee, please fill out this form. It will be forwarded to the appropriate
Steering Committee Chair. Forms should be returned to the Policy Office located in Room 22 or
to the Credentials booth located in the Registration area of the Convention/Civic Center or it can
be mailed to the NLC Center for Policy and Federal Relations, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20004.
i, 11
League of Minnesota Cities
3490 Lexingtou Avenu~ North
St. Paul, MN 55L'16.800
(612) 490-5600
TO:
FROM:
RE:
December 23, 1993
Mayors, Managers, Clerks
James F. Miller, Executive Director~
1994 NLC Congressional-City Conference
Enclosed is a program brochure and registration for the 1994 NLC Congressional-City
Conference, to be held in Washington, D.C., on March 12-15. City officials are encouraged
to attend and take part in developing an action plan to gain support for the critical budget and
policy issues facing cities during the 103rd Congress. On Tuesday, March 15, the League
.will also coordinate meetings on Capitol Hill with members of the Minnesota Congressional
Delegation during which we will discuss priorities for our cities.
The deadline for advance registration is Friday, February 11. After that date, on-site
registration will be necessary. In early January, LMC will send out travel service
information.
Minnesota city officials have identified five issues as the most important for the League
to address in 1994: crime and violence, current and prospective mandates, health care,
welfare reform, and housing and community development. The LMC Federal
Legislative Committee has also recommended policies on telecommunications and national
health care reform. The NLC Board of Directors, on which Millie MacLeod
(Councilmember, Moorhead) serves, will adopt a '94 Action Agenda early next year,
clef'ming major legislative and policy development priorities for the nation's cities. In
advance of the formal adoption of that plan, Minnesota city officials need to define our
priorities and address those at the NLC Congressional-City Conference, where the work
program and direction for NLC policy will be determined. LMC also will focus on meeting
with Minnesota congressmen and senators to talk directly with each of them about the impact
of federal policie~ at the local level. This is your chance to participate in setting that agenda
and discussing our priorities for congressional action directly with members of the Minnesota
Congressional Delegation.
Enclosure
WATERSHED DISTRICT
~~.~, 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard
~~~' Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345-1597
"=HEO u, ~KE MINN~ON~
office: (612) 939-8320 f~: (612) 939-8244
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR: Ellen B. Sones · ~o~ RwER
BOARD OF MANAGERS: Thomas Maple, Jr., Pres. · C. W~row Love John E. Thomas
Cla~son Undiey · ~omas W. La~un~ · Ma~ha S. Ha~ie~ · Pamela G. Bli~
Janua~ 3,1994
Mr. Ed Shukle
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RECEIVED 5 19!
Dear Mr. Shukle:
I would like to introduce you to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. We manage water resources
over a 181 square mile area in Hennepin and Carver Counties in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.
Some of Minnesota's most highly valued water resources lie within our borders. Urban development and
ongoing rural activities have degraded the quality of our lakes. We want to preserve these resources
for future generations.
Our recently approved Water Resources Management Plan provides us with some tools for managing
our water resources and new opportunities for working with other agencies to pursue mutual goals.
New state and federal programs provide other opportunities and challenges.
The enclosed fact sheet discusses our lake management activities. I feel it gives a pretty good overview
of what the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District does. It might assist your membership in
understanding our watershed district. If you agree, please distribute the fact sheet.
We are encouraging ideas and participation from state agencies, the District's communities and other
groups interested in restoring and protecting our water resources. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District managers believe that cooperative partnerships can best avoid duplication of government
programs and most efficiently achieve common goals.
Thank you for your support. If you have any questions or comments, please call our District
Administrator, Ellen Sones, at (612) 939-8320.
Sincerely,
President
Enclosure
RECEIVED
MCWVD LAKE MANAGEMENT
ACTIVITIES
The 181 square mile Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) originates west of
St. Bonifacius. It ends 29 miles later when Minnehaha Creek joins the Mississippi River.
Most of the MCWD lies in Hennepin County, although about 30 square miles are in
Carver County. The District includes all or part of 27 cities and three townships.
The MCWD's 22 principal lakes include some of Minnesota's most important water
resources. Some of the District's eight regional parks enjoy greater use than many state
parks. Lake Minnetonka, Minnesota's fifteenth largest lake, is the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area's premier general recreation lake. The Minneapolis Chain of Lakes
receives more visitors per year than all of the metropolitan area state parks combined
and nearly as many as Yellow Stone National Park.
With these important resources to manage and protect, the MCWD takes its lake
management responsibilities seriously. To better protect and manage these resources the
MCWD encourages communities, government agencies, and private citizens in the
watershed to help.
The MCWD does four things to manage water resources in the watershed: 1) regulates
new development, 2) prepares a water resources management plan, 3) funds a capital
improvements program to implement the management plan, and 4) collects watershed
hydrologic data.
Each of these four activities applies to all water resources in the watershed. They form
the basis for the MCWD's approach to lake management. This information sheet
discusses what the MCWD is currently undertaking in these areas and addresses the
District's future plans. It also talks about some significant changes occurring in the
watershed over the next few years. We encourage public participation and cooperative
efforts with communities and government agencies. We believe opportunities for
cooperation exist in the areas of regulation, planning, capital improvement projects, and
data collection.
MCWD Rules
The MCWD's rules apply to new work within the watershed that may impact the quality
or quantity of water. MCWD permits help ensure that developers and property owners
follow MCWD rules. In an average year, the MCWD issues about 200 permits for
activities such as stormwater management, floodplain alteration, wetland alteration,
dredging, shoreline improvements, and stream and lake crossing.
1
The dredging and shoreline rules adopted by the MCWD protect homeowners and the
environment. To ensure that work follows MCWD rules, the MCWD requires licenses
for shoreline and dredging contractors.
The MCWD's rules grew out of the water management and planning needs of the early
1980's. These have changed over the past decade. The state and federal government
have added new programs and new planning requirements. To meet the needs of the
future, the MCWD will evaluate its rules during 1994.
Lakes and wetlands comprise almost a quarter of the watershed. These include 108
protected waters and 237 protected wetlands. The MCWD focuses much of its
regulatory attention on areas adjacent or tributary to these protected waters and
wetlands. Some additional promotion of these rules might increase public awareness
and involvement. It also might help uncover violations.
Feedback on existing rules and suggestions on how they might better protect the
watershed's resources will help the MCWD assess its rules. The Wetland Conservation
Act will require changes in MCWD rules. Changes in the Metropolitan Surface Water
Management Act may also require changes in the MCWD's rules.
Cooperative efforts between communities and agencies can make rules more effective.
The District's dredging rules resulted from a cooperative effort between the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, and the
MCWD.
The MCWD will discuss these important changes at several important public meetings
over the next two years. Anyone interested in participating should contact the MCWD
office and request to be placed on the mailing list.
MCWD Planning Requirements
State statute mandates that the MCWD prepare a Water Resources Management Plan.
This plan manages water quality and quantity throughout the 181 square mile watershed.
The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) approved the MCWD's plan in May,
1993.
The MCWD's Water Resources Management Plan does several things. First, it provides
an overview of development in the District. This provides planners with an important
baseline. It also collects and compiles data needed for managing the MCWD's water
resources. This information assisted the MCWD's Managers in identifying objectives for
the District's water resources and develop a management strategy for attaining these
objectives. The MCWD's policies and rules implement the management strategy. An
important part of the management strategy includes a capital improvement program that
implements the plan.
Local water management planning is another important part of the MCWD's Water
Resources Management Plan. The MCWD's approved plan was produced from State
requirements during the 1980's. Since that time, the state has passed more stringent
local planning requirements.
Local water management plans can play a major role in protecting water resources. The
27 communities in the watershed will need to prepare local water management plans by
May of 1995.
Capital Improvements Program
The MCWD's Water Resources Management Plan identifies priority water resources.
The plan's management strategies look at ways to manage these priority resources.
Projects in the MCWD's Capital Improvements Program implement these management
strategies.
The MCWD has completed two major capital improvement projects since its creation in
1967 and several smaller projects. In the winter of 1979-1980 the MCWD built the
Headwaters Control Structure and Channel Improvements Project. The Headwaters
Control Structure on Gray's Bay provides greater control over Lake Minnetonka Water
levels. The Channel Improvements improved the flow of water in Minnehaha Creek.
The Upper Watershed Improvement Project built four detention structures, two
sedimentation basins, and one fish barrier in the Painter Creek subwatershed during the
winter of 1984-1985. This project reduced nonpoint source pollution within the Painter
Creek subwatershed to Lake Minnetonka and also provided an additional 900 acre-feet
of storage above Lake Minnetonka under 100-year storms.
Since 1967 the MCWD has completed several smaller scale projects in cooperation with
communities in the watershed. These include channel dredging and repairs to
Minnehaha Creek, building canoe landings and several small scale maintenance projects.
Gleason Creek
In 1993, the MCWD and the City of Wayzata began a joint water quality and flood
control project for Gleason Creek. This project reduces flooding along Gleason Creek
by adding 140 acre feet of flood storage. Two stormwater treatment ponds constructed
along Gleason Creek will improve the quality of water entering Lake Minnetonka.
3
Long Lake
This past year the MCWD completed Diagnostic and Feasibility Studies for Long Lake
and has completed a draft implementation plan. The MCWD is working with the cities
of Long Lake, Orono, and Medina, local homeowners, and the Hennepin Conservation
District (HCD), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to develop a cooperative plan for
improving Long Lake. The cooperating Cities and Agencies will identify water quality
goals for Long Lake. This project proposes two stormwater sedimentation basins and
two aerators. The MCWD and the cooperating cities and agencies will look at public
education programs, fisheries management, citizen's lake monitoring, best management
practices and other measures to reduce nonpoint source pollution. This project will also
look at ways the MCWD's Water Resources Management Plan and the cities' Local Water
Management Plans can better improve and protect Long Lake's water quality.
Minneapolis Chain of Lakes
The Minneapolis Chain of Lakes suffer degraded water quality. The water quality of
Cedar Lake and Lake Calhoun falls below levels considered desirable for swimming
during certain times of the summer. Although Lake Harriet's water quality remains
good, it needs help to remain that way.
The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, the Cities of Minneapolis, St. Louis Park
and Edina, several state agencies and the MCWD have joined together on a Clean
Water Partnership project for the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes. This $6.5 million project
will span several years and will involve a variety of in-lake and watershed measures and
practices. The cooperating agencies include every agency that can help. The proposed
measures range from small, volunteer efforts to large capital improvement projects.
These measures include improved street sweeping, better parking lot maintenance, better
lawn and garden management, better ordinances, and changes in use patterns. Large
scale projects include construction of grit chambers and detention basins to treat storm
water, repairing shoreline erosion problems, and treating the lakes with alum to improve
their clarity. Public education will also play a major role.
The MCWD will build several wetland treatment systems over the next six years to treat
stormwater runoff to Lake Calhoun and Cedar. These wetland treatment systems will
significantly reduce the phosphorus loading to these lakes. This will improve both
swimming and fishing. They may also address potential flooding problems. Wetland
treatment systems also provide wildlife habitat.
Lake Minnetonka
Lake Minnetonka is a priority resource for the MCWD. The following chart lists the
phosphorous loadings to Lake Minnetonka from its tributaries. The MCWD's two
4
largest capital improvements projects, the Painter Creek and the Gleason Lake Creek
projects, address two of the largest sources of phosphorus. The Long Lake project will
focus on another large phosphorus source. Two future proposed capital improvement
projects will look at Langdon Lake and Six Mile Creek.
Lake Minnetonka
Total Phosphorus Loadings
Tributary Average Annual Loading (tons/yr)
Gleason Lake Creek 1.06
Long Lake Creek 0.35
Painter Creek 3.78
Six Mile Creek 0.72
Mirmewashta Creek 0.06
Langdon Lake Outlet 1.10
Christmas Lake Creek 0.02
The District's Gleason Creek, Painter Creek and the Headwaters Control Structure
capital improvements projects cut flooding around Lake Minnetonka. By allowing better
water management, the Headwaters Control Structure also cuts flooding on Minnehaha
Creek. The Gleason Creek and Painter Creek projects hold stormwater in ponds. Some
of the sediment in the stormwater settles out in the MCWD's ponds instead of the Lake.
The MCWD regulates new development in these tributary subwatersheds, and the
completed and proposed capital improvement projects focus on structural solutions to
Lake Milmetonka's water quality and quantity problems. In the 1995 revisions to the
MCWD's Water Resources Management Plan, the MCWD will look at ways to improve its
rules and plan to better address the needs of all water resources in the MCWD. To
succeed, lake management and other best management practices need to supplement
these activities.
The Board of Soil and Water Resources Metropolitan Area Local Water Management
Rules require cities to prepare local water management plans. These plans must be
consistent with the MCWD's Water Resources Management Plan. These plans can play a
key role in the protection and management of Lake Minnetonka.
To help implement these local water management plans, the MCWD will work with
three small communities on Lake Minnetonka. These local plans will include best
management practices like those considered for Long Lake and developed for the
Minneapolis Chain of Lakes. The MCWD will also look at modifying its Capital
Improvements Program to help implement these plans. We are also looking for other
funding sources.
To guide the future management of the water quality and quantity of Lake Minnetonka,
the MCWD is forming a technical advisory committee (TAC). The TAC will advise the
MCWD on revisions to its Water Resources Management Plan, rules, and capital
improvements plan. The TAC will also provide guidance on the local water
management plans. This group can also help focus the different lake management
activities and programs that can benefit Lake Minnetonka. We have invited the
Hennepin Conservation District, the Department of Natural Resources, the Board of
Water and Soil Resources, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the Lake
Minnetonka Conservation District to join. We will also invite the lake communities and
other interested parties to participate.
Other Projects
The MCWD's Capital Improvement Program includes several other proposed projects.
Some deal with mapping and data collection needs to improve flood control within the
watershed. Others look at improvements to control flooding and improve water quality.
This winter the MCWD will start a cooperative project with the Twin Cities Tree Trust,
Hennepin County, and the communities along Minnehaha Creek to repair damage
caused by this past summer's high water and flooding.
Hydrologic Monitoring Program
Since the hydrologic monitoring program began in 1969, the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District has built the best long-term water quality and quantity data base in
the metropolitan area. This program annually collects data on precipitation, lake levels,
stream flows, lake and stream water quality, and groundwater levels and quality. These
data support the MCWD's water management planning and provide a foundation for the
Board of Managers' decisions. Valuable trend data helps the MCWD identify problems,
set objectives, and rank future projects. They also show how well completed flood
control and water quality projects can function.
Precipitation Monitoring
Most water entering the District comes from precipitation. The National Weather
Service records precipitation at two sites within the watershed. The MCWD supplements
6
this with precipitation data from nine sites. These additional sites help show the
variability of precipitation across the watershed. The northeast corner of the watershed
averages four inches more precipitation per year than the southwest comer. Total
precipitation volumes help calculate water budgets for the District. These data help size
stormwater detention and conveyance structures.
Ground Water Monitoring
In 1972, the MCWD began collecting water quality and quantity data from nine
municipal and private wells in or near the watershed. Although two of the wells are no
longer in service, the MCWD now has over 20 years of data from the remaining 7 wells.
Water level data from a long period of time shows a variety of water table trends. For
example, it can show if the water table is naturally replenishing itself or if wells are
depleting the water table faster than the natural recharge rate. Combined with
precipitation data, well records can help quantify recharge, runoff and seepage rates.
Lake Monitoring
The MCWD collects water quality data necessary to show a lake's relative water quality.
This way, we can compare the lake to other lakes and also evaluate its condition over
time. Lake water quantity data helps predict inflows, runoff levels, and subwatershed
water budgets. It also helps establish ordinary high water levels for lakes. This
sampling program in particular looks for signs of damage to lakes from urbanization,
waste water effluent, and polluted runoff.
Since 1976, the MCWD has collected water quality samples from six stations in Lake
Minnetonka. These are sampled three times a year. Once a year the MCWD samples
15 lakes upstream from Lake Minnetonka. Three times a year the MCWD collects
samples from eight lakes in the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes. Laboratory analysis looks
at these samples for 15 parameters including nutrients and various chemicals that show
degraded water quality.
Stream Sampling
Streams are important recreational areas and provide important habitat for fish and
wildlife. They also deliver polluted runoff to lakes. Stream water quality and quantity
data help identify potential flooding problems and gauge degradation to water resources.
The MCWD samples ten stream sites twice a year (mid-May and Mid-October).
Cooperative Efforts
The MCWD has cooperated with other agencies on several data gathering efforts. Over
the 25 year history of the District's hydrologic monitoring program, many other agencies
7
have supported the District's efforts. These include the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board, the Suburban Hennepin Parks, the Lake Mirmetonka Conservation
District, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Recently the MCWD supported the Suburban Hennepin Parks program to monitor
runoff from golf courses. The District is also working with the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board and several state agencies to investigate the high levels of mercury
found in fish in certain dty lakes.
Let's Work Together
New state and federal programs, increasing development, and a growing concern for our
water resources will bring many important changes in water management in the near
furore. These changes effect the MCWD's rules, planning, data collecting and capital
improvements. These changes will give government agencies, local communities,
watershed districts, and private organizations many opportunities to work together.
R[C'D NOV 2 g 1993
WILLIAM E. DARLING
2600 Grove Lane
Mound, MN 55364
(612) 472-5350
OBJECTIVE: I would be honored ffyou would consider me for the position of Park Commissioner for the CiD' of
Mound. I moved to Mound this )'ear after release from active duty in the United States Air Force. I am employed as
the Director, Information Senices with Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota and I now serve as a part time
member of the Minnesota Air National Guard. I am originally from the Twin Cities area. I bring with me a world
of experience. I feel would not only enhance the quality of life here in Mound, but would help Mound grow. I
desire to get involved with my community and this would be a great opportunity for me. My wife. also released
from active duty in the United States Air Force serves as a flight nurse with the Minnesota Air National Guard
INTERPERSONAL/LEADERSHIP SKILLS~
- Proven Track Record of Management and Leadership
- Strong Motivation and Integrity
- Excellent Oral and Written Communications
- Deeply Committed to High Standards and Quality
Skilled at Resolving Conflicts and Promoting Harmony
- Well Organized, Effective and Aggressive
EDUCATION:
MASTERS OF SCIENCE, Management Information Systems 1989, Lesley College, Massachusetts
BACCALAUREATE OF SCIENCE, Management, 1983, Southwest Texas State University, Texas
WORK EXPERIENCE - NONMILITARY:
DIRECTOR, INFORMATION SERVICES, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota
Direct the da)' to day operations and strategic planning of health care information processing in
support of current and future direction of managed care, state laws and federal health programs.
WORK EXPERIENCE - MILITARY:
CHIEF OF MAINTENANCE, Minnesota Air National Guard.
Responsible for military air traffic control and portable communications in a hostile environment
as pan of a forward combat communications support team.
CHIEF, SYSTEMS SOFTWARE AND IBM COMMUNICATIONS, The Pentagon,
Responsible for effective systems' management and controlled access on a complex data network
supporting communications needs for the Offices of the Secretary of Defense. the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and the President of the United States. Hand selected to provide VIP tours/mission briefings
for all foreign dignitary and diplomatic visits to Pentagon computer facilities.
FLIGHT COMMANDER, ICBM MISSILE COMBAT CREW
Commanded ICBM combat crews responsible for control of 50 Minuteman ICBMs. Assigned as
the Privacy Act/Freedom of Information Officer responsible for release of information.
~[C'D NOV :2 4 lgg~
John C. Edewaard
5125 Hanover l~oad
Mound, Minnesota 55364
(612) 472-3254
Fax: (612) 472-263?
November 22, 1993
Ed Shukle
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Shukle:
I would like to be considered a candidate for an opening on the Park and Open Space
Commission. I have been a resident of Mound since August of 1991. My greatest strength is my
willingness to volunteer my time. I believe that my commitment to the community can be felt
through my involvement. I take pride in my accomplishments, and I want to be proud of the city
in which I live.
Sincerely~
~waard
MOund; Minnesota 55364 -'
-Ed Shukle
"' Mound City Manager,~' -. . .
.5341 Maywood Road '
· Mound, Min.nesota 55364- ' - _.. ·
_
.... - -.~ r~st f~r appr~ti~S' for a ieat on the Mound
Emndmi el°Pm Co
-. ~'~::' cDev ant mmission. - ~"; : - .".
- ... :"'-~ ~"' ~::~h~.~ me,b~,nby-intrOdu~ngmySelf~' MY. na~ is Ji~ T~mson. My family,
¢~:.~'./"~:~?:~i~ng of'myself;: my-~fe~'and ~y ~e ~ildmn ag~ 9; .ti, and ~16 recently moVe~
: -:~-~': ..' :~: ~-~ ~nd fr6~'~ p~o~ ho.m~ in ~u~-. Minneapolis.: :~e f'ellin i°ve wi~ the small
:-': ' ~'.--, ;~:'~ ~,~-~endly ~osp~m :m~ all ~e ~nv~ien~ ~ ~ ~ ' :~i 'v ' '
=.~ ....... '~ .... .~-~:~:- .... -~ . ........ · ~.~ noas,a~ss:
- . ,:, ~ .~: -, -.'~ - *r . ~ ," ~''" ' ".' . ' . ~'' '," ..''"-, · ' ',-. 2' ','. :. -- ' ,;.'~'.. ; ....
'· - Y- .. ,. ' r... y nalystlConsul~nt~ ~eSolutions~m ~ ' ....
' ': ,':~"~,:.~:~:'" ::"~:.Te~:~i~y' divisi6n'of ~e ac~unfing fi~ of ~Per~ & L~mnd As a Systems :.
".:: ': ;':.' ': :':::~ ~:','Analy:s~; I haVe' been'~nvol~ed in analyiing 'b~iness Systems and assisting'bO~' small
':-.~'~':: ~::-~::'~'and l~me'~mpanie~'with busine~ planni~'~°th as an i~dependent consu~ant and
'~. :'. '~ .-.; ~::..~ ~_.~i~-~e'~(ate ~mmuni~ In this'~¢~ I. have been a~e to view business both
'::.':v. '~,'-~ '.-~san.en~epmneur'a~ aco~mte.emP[oyee., .'~.~-: .... ~,.. :: ..
'.: :: '.:',:~ ~-:;}*,S~ies:f~om Be'~ ~llege,',Ard~.,Hilis; MinnesOta. '":' ' '. . ' '
, --. :: ,,- I w~my'¢~zensh~p m~ Mound aS a ~way mla~Onship. ~ile I taunt it a p~vil~e to.
~.-: ~ [rom ~ ki~ ~t~d [o1~ and ~oouS ~ffin~ 'o[ Mound. I ~lso fo~l an
.' :' ~ ~ ObligatiOn .to give_ ba~ to the mmmuni~ where I am a~e:: I ~m~Eed myself to
· 'keYing an eye~t for avenues to give ba~ ~ the ~mmuni~ ~erever possiblo. In
::-~, '~is p~u~' ~odr ~ for a member for ~e E~nomic Development Commission
~ a n~ural fit[or my professional and ~r~ohal ba~gmu~, ... :. :.
Fo.'_rtUneS00 companies, Health Cate~ Manu~'ac[unng, u,s. mD.u~,o[~, at, Retail
My m!e has been to analyze and advise companies in ous~ness
Also,' germain to this commissions needs~ i have had expenence
· :, _.~ ,_... ~ developingc~mputer softWare programs and algorithms for'determining retail suitability
~ :" . ,'-'~ ',. i~ ~:-,~ping mai~:as a Programmer / AnalySt for Homa~ DeveloPment corporati°n, a
:"-.. : .... ~.. maj,. ~on-ai m~ili sh0Plsing center developer (devel°pments~include Southdale,
~' -·. - Rosedale,-Eden Prairie Center, etc). .
' "'~" :'~1. b~iieve MOUnd is a~great CommUnity with Caring people and a unique, friendly
':'~ ' :,. ': ~i '.~ p~'senali~., It~'~ecOnOmic development shOUld" seek m strengthen both the tax base of
-~ '~. ~ :i;i >', :-~'~)mmUni~ andlPrOvide for the commUni.ty's needs.'~ Economic development shOuld
": ' ~' :~.i;' :~eek ~o:kee~ ~6Und ~/iable~ .while not infringing' On the valUes'and small-town desires Of -
. ~ :",: i'*'~,: .:the'c°mm~n~-' i'i".~!' .: ': :.' ·" '- i~i- .". ~- ":.'- ": !:'.' i:' ,'i -' -., ,' ~ ' '.
: :", ; ~i-.,-.':,' ~;' ti .{h~nk you"for ~6u~:~s~idemtiOnin you~r'S'eam fora memb. e.r for this commission,.
-:'i *:' ', ':"i. ':: ::~ether.lem*chose~for this poSition-hr not,"l .would like'toOter my services wnenever --..
::. :_ ..!': :::'pOs.S!~lef0,r~be~ermer{tofour'c°mmunitY.;": --' :':,'.;·-':::i '~': _.'.' ..·,:,,. ' .:-" "-,' ..
'"' ' ....'" ....... · free Ca
, S;' ease'feel .to II meat (612),472-7225
~.' ' :: =- , ',;4 ;. ' .- .', ~+ '.,- -.' '. '. ' · . ' ~ . ,.' .... ·'.'. , -"?'. - . "
:,..,> ~::.;., :~nCem, ly>--.~:;-~.,'.....~:.>;..... ,' · ·. :,,. ~.i:· ~.~'; ::·~: .-! :,,;:~ ,~ ,. ?
: :f?-:': ,: ~,-,; ~..~ ,,..' ? ', , .. :.
--',':':?-:::.::':::.V~:T~l°mson:,:,'.':"i·' ',: '..--: :::'"':;... :--':'-'""L :-;
~:-. .... ..--...~: ._ ;_.;. ,.,~;,"x::~''.: ' . .. . ,- .... ...
, . . ,~ ,;,-~--: ... ,;.--.,,. ~ :. ; .- -? .-....:.. ~--. '-,.. .... :./, ..,.,. .. ~~, ~ ;- . .-~ · . .,
.-:':" :...-:.-.:-, ... ,....-..,. ::. :.-~.....:.-,.....:>,, ... :... >,.-..., .... _ ..-.
WILLETTE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
David W. Willette, President
P.O. Box 85 · 2542 Lost Lake Road, Mound, Minnesota S5364
11 ;
[] STATEMENT Dave 472-4332
[] INVOICE 472-6362
CORRESPONDENCE Mark 472-6815
QUOTATION Dan 471-9229
JAN 3'I ?Y' DATE:
CONTRACTOR'S NOTICE
Persons or companies furnishing labor or materials for the Improvement of real property may enforce a lien upon the improved land If they are
not paid for their contributions, even If the parties have no direct contractual relationship with the owner.
l~M..Innesota law permits the owner to withhold from his contractor as much of the contract price as may be necessary to meet the demands of
~al other lien claimants, a dlrectl the lien
P Y y s and deduct the cost of them from the contract pr ce, or withhold amounts from his contractor
until the expiration of 120 days from the completion of the Improvement unless the contractor furnishes to the owner waivers of claims for
mechanics' liens signed by pers.ons who furnished any labor or material for the Improvement and who provided the owner with timely notice.
Accepted By:
Authorized By:
Steve Smith
State Representative
District 34A
Hennepin and Wright Counties
Minnesota
House of
Representatives
COMMI3-rEES: COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; HOUSING;
iNTERNATIONAL TRADE AND TECHNOLOGY; JUDICIARY; JUDICIARY FINANCE DIVISION
January 5, 1994
RECEIVED JAN 7 -
Mayor Skip Johnson
city of Mound
3018 Island View Dr.
Mound, MN 56364
Dear Mayor Johnson:
There is a public hearing scheduled in our House District 34A next
week (see enclosed notice).
Congressman Jim Ramstad will be attending the public hearing for
the purpose of providing us a federal update on the issue and also
to listen to testimony that evening.
I invite you to attend next Wednesday.
If you can, and will let me know you are there that evening, a few
minutes before we start, I will be recognizing all public officials
present by name at the opening of the public hearing.
The hearing will be televised for local cable access.
I hope you can make it.
State Representative
enc.
2710 Clare Lane, Mound, Minnesota 55364
(612) 472-7664
(612) 296-9188
State Office Building, St, Paul, Minnesota 55155
IR FAX (612) 296-3949
Steve Smith
State Representative
District 34A
Hennepin and Wright Counties
Minnesota
House of
Representatives
COMMITTEES: COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; HOUS{NG;
INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND TECHNOLOGY; JUDICIARY; JUDICIARY FINANCE DIVISION
I have been appointed to a Minnesota House of Representatives Safe
Schools Task Force comprised of eighteen Representatives and
Senators. My goal is to seek public testimony from students,
parents, teachers and other parties and to draft appropriate
legislation for the 1994 session of the Minnesota Legislature.
Because of public concern, and my own, about the increasing level
of violence in some communities and schools throughout our state,
I am going forward with the task force and holding several public
hearings.
Most of our schools do not have a substantial problem with
violence. Most of our schools do ah excellent job, and most of our
students are well behaved. However, every school in Minnesota
should be a haven for our children/students. Our children should
be able to achieve their full educational potential in an
environment that promotes effective learning; one that is free of
violence.
This means a school where the personal integrity of the students is
secure against any form of assault by other students, whether that
assault is with a gun, a fist or hurtful words.
The Safe Schools Task Force will address the following three areas
of major concern:
1)
The extent and degree of violence in the classroom and on
school property.
2) Ways and means of preventing this violence.
3) Student safety issues in relation to school buses.
! a~ holding a public hearing in our House District, in Mound, on
Wednesday, January 12, 1994, 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., in the Board
Room, Westonka Community Center, 5600 Lynwood Blvd., Mound.
Enclosed is a questionnaire on this issue. I ask that you take the
time to fill it out and return it to me, because I want your input.
Also, you are invited to attend the public hearing on Wednesday,
January 12 from 7 o'clock to 9 o'clock p.m.
You can reach me at the State Capitol at 296-9188 or at my home in
Mound 472-7664.
2710 Clare Lane, Mound, Minnesota 55364
(612) 472-~
State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
IR FAX (612) 296-3949
(612) 296-9188
Safe Schools Task Force
The Legislature' s Safe Schools Task Force is holding a heating on student safety and violence at the Westonka
Community Center on Wednesday, January 12, 1994, at 7:00 p.m. Because you have, or may have had, children in our
school system, and since your taxes support our schools, I am very interested in learning from you about various issues
related to the safety of our students.
o
o
°
o
10.
Does your school have an anti-violence program designed to teach students ways of
resolving conflicts with their peers without resorting to physical violence? ..................
If you answered 'yes,' do you believe the existing program is effective? .....................
If you answered 'no,' do you believe such a program is necessary at your school?
Does your school have a formal policy of dealing with students who engage in the
verbal harassment or intimidation of fellow students? ..................................................
If you answered "yes,' do you believe the existing policy is effective? .........................
If you answered "no," do you believe such a policy is necessary at your school? ........
Are you aware of the presence of any students carrying weapons in your school?
On a scale of one to five (Iow to high), circle the rating that you believe indicates the
level of violence in your school .....................................................................................
On a scale of one to five (Iow to high), circle the rating that you believe indicates the
level of concern for your own personal safety in your school .......................................
On a scale of one to five (Iow to high), circle the rating that you believe indicates the
level of concern for personal safety exhibited by the average student in your school.
YES NO
I 2 3
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
Do you believe your school's administrators treat the level of violence in your school
with the seriousness it deserves? ................................................................................
Is there an age after which you believe students who pose significant behavioral or
disciplinary problems can no longer be effectively rehabilitated? .................................
Do you believe teenage students who have become involved with the criminal justice
system belong in the classroom? .................................................................................
Please write down your thoughts about school violence, disruptive student behaviors
or related problems.
Rep. Steve Smith
311 State Office Building
St Paul, Minn. 55155
~-296-9188
SAFE SCHOOLS QUESTIONNAIRE
ATTEND THE SAFE SCHOOLS TASK FORCE HEARING ON WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12
Most of our schools do not have a substantial problem with violence. Most of our
schools do an excellent job and most of our students are well behaved.
You can reach Rep. Smith at:
Office:
311 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minn. 55155
612-296-9188
Home:
2710 Clare Lane
Mound, Minn. 55364-1812
612-472-7664
However, every school in Minnesota should be a haven for our kids. Each student
should be able to achieve his or her full educational potential in an environment that
promotes effective learning. This means a school where the personal integrity of
students is secure against any form of assault by other students, whether that assault is
with a gun, a fist or hurtful words.
My Safe Schools Task Force plans to examine three areas: the extent and degree of
violence in the classroom and on school property; ways and means of preventing this
violence; and student safety issues in relation to school buses (while riding and at bus
stops).
The task force will hold a public hearing in Mound on Wednesday, January 12, 1994,
in the Board Room, Westonka Community Center, 5600 Lynwood Blvd., Mound. The
information I gather from students, parents, teachers, administrators and other
concerned members of our community will be used to help draR appropriate legislation
.for the 1994 session of the Legislature.
~ Steve Smith
I~L.F_KSE FC)~D A/.ONG T;-~,,,~ L.I~.. ~CUI~, STAMP AND MAJ~ U~ING T~ ~ELF.~O~.~.D PANF~ ~
If you would like a copy of the results,
please print your name and address below.
PLEASE
Pt.ACE
STAJdP
HERE
Rep. Steve Smith
311 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minn. 55155
RECEIVED .... 0
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Administrative Committee
Meeting Notice and Agenda
7:00 pm, Wednesday, January 12, 1994
LMCD office Conference Room 160, Norwest Bank Bldg
1. Report of 12/1/93 meeting per enclosure;
Recommendation to present to board for approval.
2. Fee study cost evaluation: (continuation of unfinished
items ):
a. Staff recommendation to:
1) Assign hourly rate to Administrative Costs (detailed
on P. 3 of 12/1/93 Admn Comm. minutes) at an
hourly rate of $24.00 per the budgeted cost
estimates of 1994 ($48,550 divided by 2,000
working hours per year, rounded to $24.00)
based upon hourly time spent by admn. tech.;
2) Clerk's time at 20% of admn. tech's, time;
all staff time to include hourly rate plus
employer benefits costs.
Motion to approve as recommended or amended;
3. Evaluation of Consultant Dick Osgood's contract for
conducting the Environment Committee responsibilities as
approved by the board 7/28/93, with a proposal for a more
limited program per the enclosed outline;
Motion to recommend the type and extent of environmental
responsibilities and monthly dollar allocation the board
should consider for the consultant;
4. Resolution to encourage each member city to publicly
express their position on support for the LMCD to resolve
the issue of the dissolution question.
Motio~rOve the draft resolution provided;
5. Review of _M_aYor's~..u~a_r.t.e~Y~,M,=ee~tvi~gR_a]g~f°r meeting
6. Save the La Committee organization and
proposed participating organizations;
Motion to recommend a structure to the board;
7. Additional business suggested by the committee;
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Administrative Committee
Meeting Report
5:30 pm, Wednesday, December 1, 1993
Tonka Bay city Hall
RECEIVED
Present:
Committee Chair Scott Carlson, Minnetrista; Dave
Cochran, Greenwood; Tom Penn, Tonka Bay; Bob
Rascop, Shorewood; Tom Reese, Mound; Executive
Director Gene Strommen, Administrative Technician
Rachel Thibault
MEETING REPORT. The committee accepted the 10/27/93 meeting
report, forwarding it to the board for approval.
FEE STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE POSITION ON FEE-RELATED ISSUES.
The outcomes of the subcommittee meetings of January 21,
March 9, April 13, June 8 and August 3, 1993, were reported
to the Administrative Con~nittee as follows:
1. The Purpose and Identification of Multiple Dock Related
Activities draft dated 11/23/92 was accepted by the
Subcommittee January 21, 1993, with minor modifications.
The revised Activities outline of 3/1/93 was accepted as
the working document for the subcommittee on 3/9/93.
Eight activities were identified in this outline.
Costs of activities, items one through four, were
accepted as applicable to multiple dock license
administration. Questions were raised on costs relating
to items five through eight, with Fee Study Subcommittee
(Subcommittee) interests stated as follows:
Item 5. Costs relating to processing code amendments;
There was no consensus on these costs. Ten code changes
relating to multiple docks were reported for 1992-93.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. Ordinances
relating to multiple dock regulation should be charged at
100% of the staff and legal time and public notification
costs to prepare them.
Item 6. Conducting studies and reviews prompted by
installation and operation of multiple docks directly
impacting the lake (i.e. floating docks, off lake
storage, others). The Subcommittee agrees actual costs
for such studies, including technical consulting where
needed, are appropriate costs.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. Concurs with
the Subcommittee.
ADMINISTRATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING REPORT, 12/1/93, P. 2
Item 7. Costs for Lake Use boat density studies are
necessitated in part by multiple dock boat sources. The
1992 Boating Study finds that 30% of boats in use on the
lake come from marina/private multiple dock accesses.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. 1992 Boating
Study findings verify a 30% contribution of boats in use
from marina/private accesses, therefore a 30% share of
costs appear appropriate to multiple dock licence
activities.
Item 8. (separated into its two individual parts):
a) Cost allocation from litigation. LMCD is unable to
predict which multiple docks might engage in
litigation. Occasions are few.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION.
Since it is not possible to anticipate which
multiple docks might be a source of litigation,
LMCD will endeavor to collect cost
reimbursement where possible or as the courts
may allow. LMCD will otherwise be obligated to
pay applicable litigation costs as part of
multiple dock related activities.
b)
Costs ~or failure of multiple dock licensees to
comply with Code,. license orders or
stipulations. Performance bonds were suggested
during Subcommittee review, but legal counsel
pointed out that bonds would be costly and
occasion to collect under them arduous.
Deposits would have to be applied to all
licensees. A non-complying licensee could well
exceed its deposit in administrative and legal
costs. Collecting excess costs would be
burdensome.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION.
Language in orders and stipulations must be
clear, well identified in licenses granted.
LMCD prospect of civil or criminal action for
violations has been effective in previous
violations. It may be relied upon in the
future to ensure compliance with minimal cost
averaged over all multiple dock license fees
over a period of years.
Cost Allocation of LMCD Overhead. Administrative costs
associated with administering multiple dock licenses, in
addition to staff time of executive director and
administrative technician, were identified as follows:
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT, 12/l/93, P. 3
Administrative Costs:
Office lease/storage
Professional services
Insurance
Office, general supplies
Telephone
Postage
Printing, publications
Maintenance, office equipment
Subscriptions, memberships
Insurance
Mileage, training
Capital outlay, equipment
Subtotal, Admn Costs
Actual 1992 Budget 1994
$ 10,461 $ 11,600
4,927 5,400
4.804 5,000
3,888 4,300
2,045 2,000
3,082 4,000
1,682 3,000
1,480 2,000
235 250
4,804 5,000
2,129 3,000
_4,423 _3,000
$43,959 $ 48,550
Proportionate time share of:
Office Secretary/Bookkeeper --
Office Clerk --
hourly rate + benefits.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. Allocate costs at
an hourly rate for annual overhead based upon a 2,000 annual
hourly operation.
ADDITIONAL FEE STUDY SUBCOMMITTEE TOPICS UNDER DISCUSSION. A
dock use area "envelope" concept for allowing multiple dock
configurations to be adjusted within the dock use area (DUA)
without requiring a change in license has been briefly
discussed. This would allow boats to be stored anywhere
within the DUA except the setback. No expansion in the
number of boats would be allowed except as provided by a
Special Density License.
This concept would presumably allow multiple dock operators
to adjust dock slips within the DUA without advance LMCD
review, approval. It would also presumably reduce staff
inspection time. Monitoring adherence to setbacks could be
more difficult as dock configurations change. Determining an
equitable fee structure remains to be answered.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. Put this subject
under review of the Water Structures Committee.
RESIDENTIAL SLIP RENTAL TO NON-RESIDENT BOATERS. LMCD moved
away from attempting to prevent dock slip rental by residents
for reasons of enforcement difficulty.
Current Code allows two restricted watercraft (boats) of any
ownership, owned from within or outside of the residence. Up
to four boats are allowed if all are owned by the residents.
More than four boats are allowed if the shoreline density of
1:50' equals more than four, with a multiple dock license
being required.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES, 12/1/93, P. 4
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. City regulation of
home occupations, prohibiting rental for any form of
remuneration, should be encouraged. Some cities already have
these regulations.
WATERCRAFT REGISTRATION FEE FUNDING ALTERNATIVE. In light of
Chair Johnstone's absence, the committee tabled discussion of
this subject.
COMMITTEE PRIORITIES. There was no discussion on this item.
COMMUNICATIONS. Quarterly reports to the cities, mayors and
councils were supported for prompt implementation. Board
members' reports to their councils were also encouraged.
SAVE THE LAKE FUND AFFILIATION WITH LMLOA. Board members are
not clear of LMLOA's objectives in establishing their private
fund raising program. Committee members were concerned that
an LMLOA tie-in with the Save the Lake fund would leave the
public perception that the money is being raised for projects
specific to benefiting riparian lakeshore owners. Committee
members see the LMLOA as a special interest group. If Save
the Lake funds were to be directed to such a group, then the
fund should be open to all lake interest groups. The
committee did not offer a recommendation to affiliate with
LMLOA at this time.
ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business, the meeting
was adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
E x e"~'ut i v e Director
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-0621
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Len Harrell
Monthly Report for December 1993
STATI__STICS
The police department responded to 1,173 calls for
service during the month of December. There were 23
Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 2
criminal sexual conduct, 1 robbery, 6 burglaries, 8
larcenies, and 6 vehicle thefts.
There were 48 Part II offenses reported. Those
offenses included 5 child abuse/neglect, 1 forgery/NSF
check, 5 damage to property, 4 liquor law violations, 3
DUI's, 3 simple assaults, 15 domestics (7 with
assaults), 6 harassments, 1 juvenile status offenses
and 5 other offenses.
The patrol division issued 115 adult citations and 3
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 42 tickets. Warnings were issued to 56
individuals for a variety of violations.
There were 6 adults and 3 juvenile arrested for
felonies. There were 17 adults and 4 juveniles
arrested for misdemeanors. There were an additional 8
warrant arrests.
The department assisted in 6 vehicular accidents, 1
with injuries. There were 30 medical emergencies and
196 animal/inspections complaints. Mound assisted
other agencies on 23 occasions in December and
requested assistance 21 times.
Property valued at $18,573 was stolen and $6 110 was
recovered in December. '
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - DECEMBER 1993
II.
INVESTIGATIO~
The investigators worked on two criminal sexual conduct
cases and 8 child protection issues in December. These
10 cases accounted for 70 hours of investigative time.
For the year, they investigated 74 child protection
cases and 16 criminal sexual conduct cases. Other
cases included robbery, burglary, theft, 2nd degree
assault, stalking, a death investigation, terroristic
threats, criminal vehicular operation, hit and run
accident, auto theft, violation of Order for protection
domestic assault, and harassing communication.
Formal complaints were issued for terroristic threats,
assault, DWI, DAC, barking dog, indecent conduct,
possession of marijuana, and no dog license.
III.
Personnel/StaffinG
The department used approximately 40 hours of overtime
during the month of December. officers used 65 hours
of comp-time, 338 hours of vacation, 55 hours of sick
time, and 40 holidays, officers earned 37 hours of
comp-time.
IV.
Ail officers attended Hazardous Materials training in
December. officer Ewald continued in the Wilson
Leadership Courses.
Police Reserve~
The Reserves donated 231 hours during the month of
December.
OFFENSES
REPORTED
CLEARED
UNFOUNDED
DECEMBER 1993
EXCEPT. CLEARED BY
CLEARED ARREST
ARRESTED
ADULT dUVENILE
PART I CRIMES
Homicide 0 0 0 0
Criminat Sexual Conduct 2 0 1 0
Robbery 1 0 0 0
Aggravated Assau[t 0 0 0 0
Burg t ary 6 0 0 1
Larceny 8 1 1 2
Vehicle Theft 6 0 0 2
Arso~ 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
~ 0
1 3
0 0
TOTAL 23 1 2 5
~ART II CRIMES
Child Abuse/Neglect 5 3 1 0 0
Forgery/NSF Checks 1 0 0 0 0
Criminal Damage to Property 5 0 0 I 1
Weapons 0 0 0 0 0
Narcotics 0 0 0 0 0
Liquor Laws 4 0 0 3 1
DWI 3 0 0 3 3
Simple Assault 3 0 0 2 3
DcxnestJc Assault 7 0 2 5 5
Domestic (No Assault) 8 0 0 0 0
Harassment 6 1 2 0 0
Juvenile Status Offenses 1 0 0 1 0
Public Peace 1 0 0 1 1
Trespassing 0 0 0 0 0
ALL Other Offenses 4 0 0 3 3
TOTAL 48 4 5 19
PART Ill & PART IV
Property Damage Accidents 5
Personal Injury Accidents 1
Fatal Accidents 0
MedicaLs 30
Animal Complaints 196
Mutual Aid 22
Other General Investigations 833
17 4
TOTAL 1,087
Nemepin Cocmty Child Protection 10
Inspections 5
TOTAL 1,17'5
5 7 24 25
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
DECEMBER 1993
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
THIS
MONTH
Hazardous Citations 55
Non-Hazardous Citations 58
Hazardous Warnings 6
Non-Hazardous Warnings 26
Verbal Warnings 106
Parking Citations 42
DWI 3
Over .10 2
'Property Damage Accidents 5
Personal Injury Accidents 1
Fatal Accidents 0
Adult Felony Arrests 9
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 24
Adult Misdemeanor Citations 1
Juvenile Felony Arrests 3
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 4
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 1
Part I Offenses 23
Part II Offenses 48
Medicals 30
Animmal Complaints 196
Other Public Contacts 833
YEAR TO
DATE
679
702
171
307
1,263
346
73
58
75
23
0
48
298
39
44
8O
12
325
738
396
1,518
9,564
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
710
323
138
421
1,143
557
64
45
84
21
1
52
416
113
48
95
45
340
707
289
896
6,983
TOTAL 1,476
Assists 30
Follow-Ups 28
Henn. County Child Protection 10
Mutual Aid Given 21
Mutual Aid Requested 23
16,759
538
328
73
172
70
13,491
896
299
59
142
55
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
DECMEBER 1993
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
MV/ATV
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
ADULT
3
2
0
6
0
44
0
0
19
0
3
0
0
0
27
0
0
42
1
5
0
2
0
!
157
_JUV
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
DECEMBER 1993
WARNINGS
No Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
ADULT
3
11
15
0
3
16
0
0
0
8
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
WARRANT ARRESTS
Felony Warrant
Misdemeanor Warrants
0
0
I m
Run: 6-Jan-94 16:47 PRO03
Prijj~JjlSN~s only: No
Date~rted range: 11/26/93 - 12/31/93
Activity codes:
Property Status: AIl
Property Types:
Property Descs: All
Brands: A[[
ModeLs:
Officers/Badges:
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Property Report
STOLEN/RECOVERED 8Y DATE REPORTED
Page
Prop Prop lnc no ISN Pr Prop Date Eptd Stolen
Tp Desc SN Stat Stolen Value
A
A
A
A SNOM, IO
A TRAILE
D
! SNOk'MO
J
TELEV!
93002395 01 01 R 12/03/93 3,000
93002520 01 01 S 12/26/93 2,500
93002520 01 03 S 12/26/93 400
93002522 01 01 R 12/27/93 2,000
93002520 01 02 S 12/26/93 400
93002432 01 03 S 12/10/93 30
93002550 01 01 S 12/30/93 3,500
93002392 01 03 S 12/01/93 1,200
93002485 01 03 S 12/17/93 130
93002526 01 02 S 12/27/93 300
93002394 01 02 S 12/01/93 350
93002449 01 01 S 12/12/93 400
93002449 01 02 S 12/12/93 544
93002485 01 01 S 12/17/93 163
93002526 01 01 S 12/27/93 315
93002394 01 01 S 12/01/93 800
93002366 01 01 S 11/29/93 200
93002432 01 01 S 12/10/93 260
93002520 01 04 S 12/26/93 300
93002522 01 02 R 12/27/93 40
93002523 01 01 R 12/26/93 30
93002532 01 01 R 12/27/93 40
93002458 01 01 S 12/15/93 160
93002485 01 02 S 12/17/93 490
93002432 01 02 S 12/10/93 20
93002445 01 01 S 12/10/93 1
93002495 01 01 R 12/22/93 1,000
Date Recov~d
Recov'd Value
12/03/93 3,000
12/27/93 2,000
12/27/93 40
12/26/93 3O
12/27/93 40
12/22/93 1,000
Quantity Act Brand Mode[ Off-1 Off-2
Code AssndAssnd
VB021 419 405
VA024 ARTIC CAT COUGAR 419 414
VA024 POLARIS INDY TRAIL 419 414
VB024 ARTIC CAT PANTERA 419 404
VA024 SPARTAN SNOI4MOBILE 419 414
TF059 411
VA024 POLARIS INDY 650 418
83434 419 415
83494 421 414
TC159 404
83434 GE 419 415
83334 FISHER 418
83334 FUNAI FT4120 418
83494 SONY 421 414
TC159 404
83434 SONY KV2TT520 419 415
TG159 MOTOROLA 8000 422
TF059 411
VA024 419 414
VB024 419 404
U328~ 419
TG059 419 414
R2423 416 404
83494 421 414
TF059 411
TG059 405
TC029 411
~*** Report Totats: 18,573 6,110 26.000
6-Jan-94 14:55 CFS08
Primary ISNfs onty: No
Date Reported range: 11/26/93 - 12/31/93
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How ReceiVed: All
Activity Resulted: Alt
Dispositions: Att
Officers/Badges: Alt
Grids: All
Patrol Areas: All
Oays of the week: All
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
NUMBER OF
ACTIVITY COOE INCIDENTS
DESCRIPTION
44
9000 SPEEDING
9001 J-SPEEDING
1
9006 TEST REFUSAL
9014 STOP SIGN
9030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 1
90~ ALL OTHER TRAFFIC 1
9040 NO SEATBELT 2
9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 16
9140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS 26
6
9200 DAS/OAR/DAC
9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER'EXPIRED 19
9220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF 27
9240 CHANGE OF D(~ICILE 1
9312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 5
9313 FOUND PROPERTY 5
9314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED 1
9315 UNCLAIME DESTROYED ANIMALS 2
9400 ALL OTHER MTR VEH ACCIDENTS 1
9420 DERELICT AUTO 3
9430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS 1
9450 PROPERTY DRMAGE ACCIDENTS 4
9451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. 1
Page
Run: 6-Jan-94 14:55 CFS08
Pr~lSN's only: NO
DatL'~l~ported range: 11/26/93 - 12/31/93
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: At[
Activity Resutted: Att
Dispositions: Alt
Officers/Badges: AIl
r Grids: Att
Patrot Areas: AIl
Days of the week: Alt
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION
9560 MEDICAL/AB
9561 DOG BITE
9566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS
9~20 MEOICAL/OOA
9730 MEOICALS
9731 MEDICALS/DX
ICALS/CI
9750 FIRES
9800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED
9801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
9802 PUBLIC ASSIST
9900 ALL HCCP CASES
9904 OPEN DOOR/ALARMS
9920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
9930 HANDGUN APPLICATION
9980 WARRANTS
9990 MISC. VIOLATIONS
9992 MUTUAL AID/8100
MUTUAL AID/6500
9994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER
A5351 ASLT 5'INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM'HANDS-AOLT-FAM
A5352 ASLT 5'MS-INFLICT BD HRN-HANOS-ASLT-AC
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calts For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
1
1
5
1
25
2
1
1
3
8 '/
1
10
8
5
9
8
1 v'
12
?
1
Page
6-Jan-94 14:55 CFS08
Primary ISN~s only: No
Date Reported range: 11/26/93 - 12/31/93
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: Ali
Activity Resutted: Alt
Dispositions: All
Officers/Badges: All
Grids:
Parrot Areas: All
Days of the week: All
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
A5354 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM 3
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-NO ~EAP-ADLT-ACQ 1
A9507 TERROR'THRT INFLT BH'UNK ~EAP-POLICE 1
B3334 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK ~/EAP-CGM THEFT 1
B~434 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK ~EAP-COt4 THEFT 1
B3494 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT 1
B4760 BURG &-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK gEAP-UNK ACT 2
B4860 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1
C3111 FORGERY-MS'MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON 1
13060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD 2.
/
J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 1
J3500 TRAF-ACCID-NS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR~ 2
J3EO0 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MO~E-UNK INJ-UNK VEH 1
J3E04 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-SNC~OBILE 1
L4022 CSC 2 IdEAP-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-M 1
L7977 CSC &-ATTEMPTED-ACQUAINT'lB OLOER-F 1
!~001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 3
M~O05 JUVENILE-USE OF TOGACCO 1
1
LIQUOR - OTHER
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-NARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 5
03882 OBSENITY-MS-O~SCENE PHONE CALL-AOULT 1
Page
Run: 6-Jan-94 14:55 CFS08
P~y [SN's on[y: No
DatL~lreported range: 11/26/93 - 12/31/93
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received:
Activity Resulted: Att
Dispositions: Att
Officers/Badges:
Grids:
Patro[ Areas: Att
Days of the week: Att
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Ca[ts For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPT[Ofl ]NC[DENTS
PROP DAMAGE'MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
ROBB-AGG-NO BH-CON STO-FIREARM-ADULT-STR
THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILD]NG-OTH PROP
THEFT-SO1-2500-FE-MOTOR VEN-OTN PROP
P3110
R2423
TC029
TC159
TF059 THEFT'201-5OO-GN-YARDS-OTH PROP
TG021 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-MONEY
HEFT-LESS 200-GN-YARDS-OTN PROP
TG159 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
U3288 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-200 OR LESS
VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-TNEFT-SNOiWNOB]LE
VEH'501-2500-FE-THEFT-AUTO
VEN-501 2500-FE-TNEFT-SNC)UMOBtLE
VEN-501-2500-FE-TAMPER W[TN-ENTER-SNC)iJNOBILE
CRIM AGNST GOVN-MS-ESCAPE TAX-HTR VEN
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
VA024
VB021
VB024
VB085
Y3230
**** Report Totals:
347
Page
Run: 6-Jan-94 15:52 OFF01
Primary ISN~s only: No
Date Reported range: 11/26/93 - 12/31/93
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: ALI
Activity codes: AIl
Officers/Badges: ALL
Grids: Att
ACT ACTIVITY
COOE DESCRIPTION
A5351 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
A5352 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BO HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC
A5354 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM-HANOS-CHLD-FAM
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
A9507 TERROR-THRT INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-POLICE
B3334 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT
B3434 BURG ~-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK ~EAP-CO~ THEFT
B3494 BURG ~-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT
B4760 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK gEAP-UNK ACT
B4860 BURG &-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
C~111 FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
13060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-ORIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
d3500 TRAF-ACCIO-MS-ORIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J3EO0 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK 1NJ-UNK
J~E04 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK tNJ-SNO~a4OBtLE
L4022 CSC 2 ~EAP-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-M
L7977 CSC &-ATTEMPTED-ACQUAINT'18 OLDER-F
M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER
M3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO
M4199 LIQUOR - OTHER
N30~O DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
N~190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING CC)HMUNICATIONS
MOUND POliCE DEPARTMENT
Enfors offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page 1
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
7 0 7 0 5 0 2 7 100.0
I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 G
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0
I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
5 1 4 2 0 0 2 2 50.0
Run: 6-Jan-94 15:52 OFF01
ISN's only: No
range: 11/26/93 - 12/31/93
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: All
Activity codes: All
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: AlL
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL
COOE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING
03882
P3110
R2423
TC029
TC159
TF059
TG021
TG159
U3288
VA024
VB021
VB024
VB085
Y3230
OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE'UNK INTENT
ROBB-AGG-NO BH-CON STO-FIREARM-ADULT-STR
THEFT-501-2500'FE'BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-501-2500'FE-MOTOR VEH'OTH PROP
THEFT-201-5OO-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-MONEY
IEFT'LESS 200-GM-YARDS'OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MOTOR VEH'OTH PROP
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING'200 OR LESS
VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE'THEFT'SNOW-MOBILE
~H-501-2500-FE-THEFT-AUTO
VEH-501 2500-FE-THEFT-SNCYdMOBILE
VEH-501-2500'FE'T~PER WITH-ENTER-SNO~JMOBILE
CRIM AGNST GOVN-NS-ESCAPE TAX-NTR VEH
1 0 1 1
5 0 5 4
1 0 1 1
1 0 1 0
1 0 1 1
1 0 1 1
1 1 0 0
2 0 2 1
1 0 1 1
1 0 1 0
2 0 2 2
1 0 1 0
1 0 I 0
2 0 2 2
1 0 1 0
Page Z
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
0 0 0 0 0.0
I 0 0 1 20.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 0 1 100.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 0 1 50.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
0 0 1 1 100.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
0 1 0 1 100.0
1 0 0 I 100.0
0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 0 I 100.0
**** Report Totats: 61 5 56 25 20 4 7 31 55.3
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 13, 1993
CASE ~93-059: OUR LADY OF THE L,~KE CHURCHf 2385 COHMERCB BLVD.t
LOT8 8, 7, 8 & 9~ AUDITOR8 BUBD. if167~ LOT8 It 2~ & 3, GUILFORDS
RF,~RR. OF MOUND :BAY PARKf. PID ~14-117-24 44 0005. LOT COVEI~GR
VARIKNCE FOR ADDITION.
City Planner, Mark Koegler, explained to the Planning Commission
that churches are permitted uses in the B-! district and schools
are conditional uses in the B-1. The proposed activity center has
been interpreted by staff to be a "church" expansion, therefore a
conditional use permit is not required.
Shoreline provisions of the Mound Shoreland Ordinance states that,
"impervious coverage in lots in the business and industrial zones
shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. In business
industrial zones that are included within areas covered by an
approved storm water management plan, impervious cover shall not
exceed 75 percent of the total lot area. At the present time,
Mound does not have a storm water management plan in place,
however, the City is currently having initial discussion on the
preparation of such a plan.
At present, impervious portions of the church site total 54.3%.
With the addition of the Activity Center, the amount of hard cover
will rise to 57.4%, a 3.1% increase.
Koegler noted that only roof drainage will be increased which is
considered relatively clean since it does not contain the oils,
salts and particulates that result from parking lot drainage.
Additionally, where possible, storm water is being drained over
grass areas prior to collection in the storm sewer system.
Staff recommended approval of the variance request which results in
a 3.1% increase in the total amount of impervious surface, subject
to the church obtaining required approvals and permits from
Hennepin County. The proposed church expansion represents a
reasonable use of the property, and given tight site conditions,
reasonable efforts have been made to accommodate additional storm
water.
When the City eventually adopts a storm water management plan, the
church, even with the new expansion, will be well under the maximum
threshold of 75% impervious cover.
Meyer questioned if the expansion will affect the already tight
parking problem. Koegler commented that the addition will not
warrant increased parking needs due to the times it will be
utilized.
Johnson commented that he has a concern due to the issues in the
previous case where the emphasis was to reduce the amount of runoff
into Lost Lake, and now this request, if approved, will increase
the runoff into Lost Lake. He also stated that Mound does not have
a Storm Water Management Plan, therefore, the 75% rule is not
applicable in this situation.
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Voss to recommend
approval of the variance to impervious surface to allow
for the church expansion as recommended by staff. Motion
carried 6 to 2. Those in favor were: Meyer, Weiland,
Jensen, Voss, Hanus, and Michael. Clapsaddle and Johnson
opposed.
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on January 11, 1994.
MINiYFES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMM[qSION
JANUARY 10, 1994
C~SE ~93-058: ;~M'IE8 & C~THERZNE VEITt 2563 LOST Li~E RO~Dt LOT~8~
BLOCK L~ LOST Li%KE~ PID ~24-LIL7-24 22 0032. F~SEHENT V~C~TION.
This request was tabled at the December 13, 1993 Planning
Commission meeting to allow time for gathering information relating
to Lot 17, the parcel to the north, the land availability to the
west, and speculations by the city on anticipations of the Storm
Water Management Plan.
Building official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed a letter which he
mailed Go the applicant on December 30, 1993 that requested
additional information regarding the balance of the easement on lot
17 and the area to the west that is City owned. Sutherland noted
that staff has not received any additional information to-date.
Vern Veit, original developer of the Lost Lake Subdivision and
representing the applicant, submitted to the Planning Commission a
packet of information including: "Reasons for needing partial
vacation of draining easement," drainage calculations, and a copy
of State Statue 505.02 with the following highlighted "The purpose of
any easement shown on the plat must be clearly stated, and shall be confined to
only those that deal with public utilities, and such drainage easements as deemed
necessary for the orderly development of the land encompassed within the plat."
Mr. Veit also displayed a drawing on tagboard consisting of the
surveys for lots 17, 18, and 19. Mr. Veit proceeded to expound on
the reasons for needing the vacation, as follows:
- Easement area designated is grossly oversized for its need and
use.
- The land planners (Coffin & Gronberg) did a poor job designing
this lot.
- If vacation is not granted, a 9 foot high retaining wall would
be required to allow for the driveway which would not be
aesthetically pleasing. If a terraced wall is installed, it
would need to encroach into the easement, or require partial
vacation of the easement (approximately 12 feet). A terraced
retaining wall would continue the continuity of this
development.
It was noted that the drainage calculations have not been submitted
to the City for staff review prior to the meeting. Mr. Veit stated
that the city Engineer did have the opportunity to review them.
The Planning Commission discussed that this is a good example of a
house not designed for the lot. Clapsaddle commented that he
wanted to hear the city Engineer's comments on the applicants
information.
Planning Commission Minutes
January 10, 1993
Easement Vacation
Case $93-058
Page 2
Hanus commented that it appears impractical to expand the pond to
either the north or the south, and the logical direction for
expansion would be to the west. He discussed this issue with John
Cameron earlier in the day, and he indicated that the applicant's
needed to provide documentation that the easement is not needed.
Michael reiterated that the required information was not submitted
by the applicant in time to be reviewed by the City Engineer. It
was noted that there may have been a lack of communication between
staff and the applicant's as they were unclear as to what
information was to be provided. Sutherland noted in his letter
that the applicant's surveyor was to contact either himself or the
city Engineer to clarify the needed information; and this was never
done.
Veit stated that the city Engineer has all the same information
that they presented this evening. The Building Official noted that
this information does not reflect the current conditions of the
site as the pond was not installed as it was intended.
MOTION made by Hanus to recommend approval of the
vacation of the easement up to the southern edge of the
walkway easement, provided the applicants reverse the
City Engineer's opinion, and it is recommended the City
Council table this issue at their meeting on January 11,
1994 until the applicant can discuss with the City
Engineer what information is required, due to an obvious
communication breakdown. When the information is
available the case should be referred back to the
Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Michael.
The Commission discussed the fact that the Council has a scheduled
public hearing for this case tomorrow, and how does this affect the
motion.
MOTION withdrawn by Hanus and Michael.
MOTION made by Hanus to table the request for an easement
vacation until the applicant can provide further
information supporting their claims. Clapsaddle seconded
the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
The Planning Commission requested their message be forwarded to the
City Council at their meeting on January 11, 1994.
FOR OCTOBER 26, 1993, COUNCIL MEETING:
ADDITIONAL LICENSES:
1. HEADLINER'S BAR & GRILL - 3 ADDITIONAL GAMES OF SKILL
LICENSES
- 1 ADDITIONAL POOL TABLE LICENSE