The URL can be used to link to this page

1996-07-09 AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 9, 1996, 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS PAGE 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 25, 1996 REGULAR MEETING ................................... 2291-2298 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A MINOR AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS FOR MEYER'S MOUND SERVICE LOCATED IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 2610 COMMERCE BLVD., PID/~23-117-24 14 0043 & 0050 ............................. 2299-2321 CASE #96-32:. RESOLUTION APPROVING A YAmANCE FOR A GARAGE/SECOND FLOOR ADDITION, RAYMOND BAYLOR, 4790 NORTHERN ROAD ................................. 2322-2342 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT ~/~.. FOR STAIRWAY AND RETAINING WALL, STEPHANIE COON, 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE .......................... 2343-2358 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INCREASE IN FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION PENSION BENEFIT EFFECTIVE JULY 1,1996......... 2359-2364 CONTINUED DISCUSSION: PROPOSAL FOR NEW DOCK LOCATIONS - LONGFORD ROAD, BRENSHELL HOMES/ FINE LINE DESIGN. (There will be handouts also Tuesday evening) ....... 2365-2382 8. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ............... APPROVAL OF A QUASI PUBLIC FUNCTION-PORTABLE SIGN APPLICATION FOR THE MOUND WESTONKA CLASSIC, MOUND WESTONKA BASEBALL ASSOCIATION .................... 2383 2288 '~'ERRACE, PID 14-117-24 32 0046 ........ ................... 2384-2391 11. SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A 30 FOOT WIDE PLATFED RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS COBDEN [ ~[(p~e' LANE, LOCATED NORTH OF WINDSOR ROAD AND TERMINATED d/l~'q AT LOT 3, BLOCK 1 OF TEAL POINTE LOCATED IN"' '"ARDEN 6'~ ADDITION. SUGGESTED DATE: AUGUST 13, 1996 ................ 2392 12. PAYMENT OF BILLS ................................... 2393-2407 13. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: A. DEPARTMENT HEAD MONTHLY REPORTS FOR JUNE, 1996 .................................. 2408-2430 B. LMCD REPRESENTATIVE'S MONTHLY REPORT FOR JUNE, 1996 ............................... 2431 C. LMCD MAILINGS - 1997 LMCD BUDGET WHICH RECENTLY ADOPTED BY THE LMCD BOARD .............. 2432-2437 D. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 24, 1996 .................................... 2438-2440 E. REMINDER: SPECIAL MEETING RE: POLICE SERVICES STUDY, WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 7 PM, SHOREWOOD CITY HALL. MAYOR POLSTON AND COUNCILMEMBER JENSEN INDICATED THAT THEY WILL BE ATTENDING ................................. 2289 Proposed Resolution Meyer's t'.2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously recommended approval, with the conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council does hereby approve a conditional use permit for Meyer's Mound ,-- Service as a Minor Automobile Repair facility subject to the following conditions: t~ ' "/~/~ '~ // ~~7~¢~' ~'~/~'~'--a/'°'/~F'~nglon the site shall be limited to the area north of the structure. All vehicles parked on the site shall have current vehicle license tabs. The sale of vehicles on the. property is prohibited. b. The~g~'l'~~rth side of the building shall be improved consistent with City ordinance requirements. Said improvement shall include but not be limited to bituminous surfacing and construction of required fencing. All trash and parts storage shall be screened. The applicant shall prepare and submit a screening plan for review and approval by the Mound Building Official. Any future changes in signage for the business shall comply with the Mound Sign Ordinance. e. Ail vehicle repair activities shall occur inside the building. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed one year from the date of City Council approval at no cost to the applicant. g. Tax parcels 23-117-24 14 0043 and 23-117-24 14 0050 2. This Conditional Use Per/hit is grant~ f~f the followin Lots 1, 2, 3, and the South half of 47, 48, and 49, Block 9, PID 23-117-24 14 0043 and 0050. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorder or of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36/ Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. .~Boo RESOLUTION//96- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A MINOR AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS FOR MEYER'S MOUND SERVICE LOCATED IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 2620 COMMERCE BLVD. LOTS 1, 2, 3 & S. 1/2 OF 47, 48, 49, BLOCK 9, PID'S 23-117-24 14 0043 & 0050 P&Z CASE//96-26 WHEREAS, Richard R. & Connie L. Meyer, Owners of Meyer's Mound Service, have applied for an amendment to their Conditional Use Permit to allow an Auto Repair Business, and; WHEREAS, Mound Zoning Ordinance Section 350:640 allows Minor Auto Repair Businesses in the B-1 Zoning District with a Conditional Use Permit, and; WHEREAS, Resolution #79-427 approved a special (conditional) use permit for this property that allowed the operation of an automobile transmission repair facility with conditions that included no outside storage of parts, material and equipment; limited lighting; and no more than one car stored outside, and; WHEREAS, the applicant has requested parking for 25 vehicles, and; WHEREAS, complaints have been received about the overall appearance of the property and the number of vehicles parked on the site, the Building Official determined that the use of the property has changed substantially over the years without any update or modification of the conditional use permit, and; WHEREAS, in December of 1985, the Meyers purchased the residential property to the north of the auto service facility which is currently vacant and used for vehicle parking, and; WHEREAS, the gas pumps have been removed and sale of gasoline has discontinued, and; WHEREAS, the parking area currently has a gravel surface. The Zoning Code requires that all parking areas and access drives serving commercial property be paved with bituminous or concrete surfacing. The code also states that parking lots cannot be located closer than 5 feet from an adjacent lot zoned or used for residential purposes, and; WHEREAS, the code requires fencing along the east side of the parking lot. That provision requires that "a fence of adequate design, not over five (5) feet in height nor less than four (4) feet in height shall be erected along the Residential District property line," and; WHEREAS, City Code requires the screening of all dumpster enclosures. The original special use permit prohibited outside storage of parts, material and other equipment. The existing dumpster as well as all parts storage needs to be screened, and; MOUND CITY COUNCIL - JULY 9, 1996 1.1 PUBLIC II-EARING: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A M'fi'qOR AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS FOR MEYER'$ MOUND SERVICE LOCATED IN TI~ B-I CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 2610 COMMERCE BLVD., PID ~23-117-24 14 0043 & 0050. City Planner Mark Koegler stated the owners had applied for an amendment to their Conditional Use Permit to allow an Auto Repair Business in the B-1 District. He reviewed the conditions with the Council and stated staff and Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. Councilmember Jensen questioned the actual number of vehicles allowed to be parked overnight on the lot. Discussion revolved around there not being a limited number of vehicles, rather keeping the parked vehicles within the north lot. Mayor Polston opened the public hea~fi, ng and asked if there was anyone present who wished to comment either for or against this item. Mr. Meyer was present and stated that he did not want a limit on the vehicles as vehicles will be coming and going frequently. Weather conditions often dictate the count of vehicles as his business was AAA authorized. Also, he had agreed, as the Planning Commission had requested, to not have any overnight parking on the south side of the property along Bartlett Boulevard. Then Mr. Meyer questioned item "g" in the conditions regarding the two parcels being combined. He stated he could not do this as the north lot was on a contract for deed and not paid off yet. He would like to have that portion of the resolution removed. Council discussed this and the City Attorney reworded item "g' to read: Tax parcels 23-117-23 14 0043 and 23-11%24 14 0050 shall be required to be under one ownership and if either parcel Ls sold or transferred, this Conditional Use Permit shall immediately become n_..ull, and void and the new owner or owners shal~ be required to reapply for a new Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Meyer was in agreement. City Man~ger Ed Shukle read a letter from a neighboring resident, Mr. Tom Reese, that stated his agreement w~da~the business proposal.. · Being no more comments for or against, Mayor Polston closed the public h ' g. Mayor Polston was concerned with the possibility of complaints of too many vehicles and if the resolution did not state an actual count, what guidelines did the City have to enforce over parldng? Councilmember Iensen suggested changing the word 'parking' to 'storage' of vehicles. Mayor Polston stated that if the resolution was not defined clearly, a precedence could be established. Consensus was to let the area in use be the definition. Councilmember Jensen moved and Councilmember Hanus seconded the amended resolution: RESOLUTION #96-69 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A MINOR AUTO REPAIR BUSENF_.SS FOR NIEYER'S MOUND SERVICE LOCATED IN TIlE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT LOTS 1, 2, 3, & S. 112 OF 47, 48, 49, BLOCK 9, PID'S 23-117-24 14 0043 AND 0050. PZ ~6-26. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RECEIVEO JUL 5 1990 Suburbon FIIl once July 3, 1996 Suburban Alliance has for the past 23 years served well the needs of citizens in western Heunepin County. As you may have heard Suburban Alliance (West Hennepin Human Services) has recently experienced some financial difficulty which may force the organization into a rather difficult decision of survival (see press release dated June 24, 1996). Since that time the Hennepin County staffhave reversed their opinion and are recommending to the commissioners termination of the emergency services and planning and coordination contracts with Suburban Alliance. These contracts constitute the major portion of funding for our orgamzation. While county staff have assured us there would be no interruption of emergency services to people and famihes in need, we are concerned for the loss of planning and coordination services and the unique citizen input that has been the trademark of Suburban Alliance. Since Suburban Alliance was formed under a joint powers agreement among west Hennepin County's municipalities, the executive board thinks it is imperative that your municipality participate in a discussion of our current situation and the decision of the future existence of Suburban Alliance. A joint meeting of municipal representatives, the Board of Directors of Suburban Alliance and county staff is scheduled for 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday July 16, 1996, at the Plymouth Safety Building, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard, Plymouth, MN. 55447. If you are unable to attend, would you appoint a staff member to represent your municipality. Please RSVP to Perry Madsen, office manger, at 930-3356 by Friday July 12, 1996. Sincerely, Steve Mumma, Chair Board of Directors SM:pm Enclosure: West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board 9 Seventh Avenue South · Hopkins, MN 55343 · (612) 930-3356 · Fax (612) 930-3540 West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board (now doing business as -Suburb~ Alliance') has been in existence for over 23 years. During that ~e the agency has adv~a~ed, planned, coordinatea and delivered direct se~ices in the h~n se~ices arena. It has had a posi=ive impact on eve~ one of the twenty-one me,er municipali=ies from western ~ennepin County that subscribe to the joint powers agreement from which ~t was created. It has also benefitted ~on-me~er municipalities and assisted ~housanas of individuals. These have incluaed diverse m~ers of the co--unity such as senior citizens needing =ransportation =o 1~ income me,ers needing assistance and direction in such areas as finding job, obtaining eme=gency assistance and peer counselling. A service directo~published by the agency reached 40,000 people and became a staple reference ~or local police departments to advise people in need of social se~ice assistance as to where to go. Because of its unique ~osition within the h~an se~icee co.unity Suburban Alliance has also been asked to~ nurture fledgling non-profi~ organi=ations~ directly a~inister Ener~ Assistance dollars on behalf o~ the state and ~eral gover~ents~ and act as the ~iscal agen~ for various other hu~n s~rvice oTgani~ations that did not have the resources ~o hire and~intain sufficient staf~ of their ~. ~er ~he last ~wo years Suburban Alliance has endured a continuous onslaught of changes and setbacks in its financia~ picture. First, it lost its free office space in St. Louis Park. In Augus= o~ 1994 it moved to its pre~ent location in Hopkins at a rent currently acc~ing at $3,000 per month. Second, Suburban Alliance learned in lace 1994 =hat its long standing executive director intended to resign. The agency is governed by an all volunteer board consisting of appointees from its various signatory cities, associated humans service agencies/ organizations and members at large. A new director was hired in early 1995. There were contemporaneous indications from Washington that there would be unspecified cutbacks in BnergyAssistance funding. For the fiscal year 1993-94 the Energy Assistance contract involved the administration of 2.5 million dollars. For 1995 it was slightly over one million dollars and it may go below six figures for 1996- 97. These funding cutbacks have adversely affected the agency's internal budget dollars because it cause~ shrinkage in administrative overhead funds. In 1995 Suburban Alliance also lost two agencies for which it had been fiscal agent. This meant that funds Suburban Alliance had held for their benefit had to be repaid causing even more pressure on its cash flow and financial reserves. It also meant loss of additional income associated with the administration of their contracts. As these events unfolded the board was not able to react quickly enough. Much of this was due to the lack of critical financial data. The complexity of the agency's functions and accounting methods also tended to mask flnanciml problems. Past audits, including the 1994 audit, had not revealed any serious problems. Consequently, business tended to continue as usual. By late 1995 financial demands began to emerge which made it apparent that the agency would have to substantially reduce its administrative costs. This step was taken in the form of lay-offs, salary reductions and other cost reducing actions. The board's reaction was insufficient to meet the financial problems that were converging and compounding themselves. In early 1996 additional staff was laid off. In May of 1996 the executive director resigned. The agency has operated since early May, 1996, with a skeleton staff. Its board chair, Steve Mumma, has assumed, for ell intents and purposes, the role of volunteer executive director assisted by other board members in various roles. There have been numerous financial reforms instituted. Checks and balances have been installed to help ensure that the agency will react more quickly to financial pressures. A search for a replacement executive director has begun. The agency is being assisted in this process by a to9 General Mills executive offered to it through MAPP. The 1995 audit confirms that the agency over spent its revenue by approximately $78,000. Hennepin County is fully aware of the problem and has been provided with a copy of the agency's 1995 audit. The audit shows no illegality or wrongdoing, but does explain the nature and scope of the shortfall. A 91an of repayment is being developed. Throughout these difficulties the board of Suburban Alliance has remained strong and committed. Support for the agency has been expressed by its sister agencies such as the Northwest Human Services Council and Community Action for Suburban Hennepin. Assuming that accegtab~e assurances and re£orms a=e in place, the COUnty h&S uxpre~ i~s interest in continuing its planning and coordination contract and the Emergency Services contract with Suburban Alliance. The Department of Economic Security, as the responsible state agency ~or the Energy Assistance program, has remained supportive. Suburban Alliance is and will continue to be a vital and viable asset to the citizens of Hennepin County. Its role may be redefined in some ways, but its vision will always be the same- emgowerment o~ ~hose who are economically or socially challenged through 91anning, coordination and advocacy of appropria~e social service 9rograme. RECEIVED JUL _ 8 1!)9§ L~KE H~NNETONK~ CONSERVATION DISTRICT BO~tD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 pm, Wednesday~ 3uly 10, 1996 Tonka Bay city Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CH~IR ]%NNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Babcock READING OF MINUTES- 6/26/96 Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent Agenda items identified by "*" will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests a discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. NATER BTRUCTURES city of Minnetonka Beach, Staff update on municipal dock situation on Huntington Point firelane, follow-up on 6/26/96 Board meeting; B. ordinance ~mendment, 3rd reading of an Ordinance defining and prohibiting the use of storage boats on Lake Minnetonka; amending LMCD code Sections 102, 55B, and 55C, and Section 2.12, Subd. 2; C. Excelsior Park Pavilion, Consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of New Multiple Dock and Special Density License applications; D. Additional Business; L]tKE USE ~ RECRF2%TION *A. Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol significant Activity Report (handout); B. ordinance ~men4ment, 1st reading of an Ordinance relating to high water conditions; amending LMCD Code Section 3.021, subd. 2A); C. Review and Discussion on Personal Watercraft article; D. Additional Business; EWM/EXOTICS TABKFORCE Update on 1996 EWMharvesting program; B. Additional Business; 4. AD~IN~TI~TION A. 1996 Budget Amendment for computer upgrades; B. Additional Business; 5. FIFANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers for payment (handout); B. Additional Business; 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 7. OLD BUSINESS 8. NEW BUSINESS 9. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 25, 1996 The City Council of the City of Mound, I-Iennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 25, 1996 at 7:30 PM, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Mark I-Ianus, Liz lensen and Phyllis Jessen. Also present: City Manager Edward J. Shulde, Jr., Building Official Jori Sutherland, City Attorney Curt Pearson and Acting City Clerk Linda Strong. The following interested citizens were also present: Clayton "Jay" Duggan, Debbi¢ and Ray Baylor, Denise Bonnema, Gaylen Thostensen, Michael Pride, Stephanie Coon, John Boyer. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed those in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 1.0 RECYCLOTTO WINNER Mayor Polston announced that Douglas Hellerud had won 300 Westonka Dollars for his recycling efforts. 1.1 APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 11, 1996 REGULAR MEETING. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens, and carried unanimously to approve the Minutes of the June 11, 1996 regular City Council Meeting. 1.2 APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JIJNE 18, 1996 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING. 1.3 MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Hanus, and carried unanimously to approve the Minutes the June 18, 1996 Committee of the Whole Meeting. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING: STREET VACATION - CHURCHILL LANE, MICHAEL AND CARRIE MCDONALD, 3018 CHLrRCHILL LANE, PID# 24-117- 24 44 0146, PZ#96-18. Mayor Polston reopened the continued public hearing and asked if there was anyone present who wished to either speak in favor or against the vacation of a portion of Churchill Lane. Michael McDonald, 3018 Churchill Lane approached the Council. He is the applicant and stated that he had been maintaining this area for a long time and would like to upgrade the area. Being no more comments from the public, Mayor Polston closed the public hearing. Building Official Jori Sutherland stated that the applicants have requested the vacation of the 230 foot Minut~ - Mound City Council June 25, 1996 wide platted right-of-way located between Block 12, Lots 19-26, 5, 6, and 7, and Block 14, lots 4-17, all in Arden. He stated the staff and Planning Commission recommended approval. Councflmember Hanus stated that there were actually two issues here; the vacation of Churchill Lane and to approve variances to recognize an existing nonconforming street frontage and front yard setback to allow for the already constructed decks. Hanus moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution as proposed: RESOLUTION//96-62 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE VACATION OF AN UNIMPROVED PLATTED RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS CHURCHILL LANE LOCATED BETWEEN BLOCKS 12 AND 14 IN ARDEN. PZ#96-18. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Hanus moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution as proposed: RESOLUTION #96-63 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING EXISTING NONCONFORMING STREET FRONTAGE AND FRONT YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF ONE CONFORMING DECK AND ONE NONCONFORMING DECK AT 3018 CHURCHILL LANE, LOTS 19, 20, 21 BLOCK 12, PID #24- 117-24 44 0146. PZ#96-18 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.4 CASE //96-27: VARIANCE FOR GARAGE ADDITION, CLYDE AND DENISE BONNEMA, 5513 BARTLETT BLVD., PID 24-117-24 23 0018. Building Official Jon Sutherland stated the applicants have requested a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming rear yard and lakeshore setback variance to allow construction of a conforming 20' x 30' garage addition. Staff and Planning Commission recommend approval. Hanus wanted a clause included that stated the shed would be relocated within one year as stated in the applicants letter. Hanus moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution as amended: RESOLUTION//96-64 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACKS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING GARAGE ADDITION AT 5513 BARTLETT BLVD., PART OF LOTS 13 AND 14, THE BARTLETT PLACE, PID #24- 117-24 23 0018. PZ#96-27. Minutes - Mound City Council June 25, 1996 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.5 CASE//96-28: VARIANCE FOR HOUSE/GARAGE ADDITION, CLAYTON DUGGAN III "JAY", 5117 TUXEDO BLVD., LOTS 13/14, BLOCK 9, WHIPPLE, PID 24-117-24 43 0047: Jon Sutherland, Building Official, stated the applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance to allow construction of a conforming 22' x 36' two story addition. The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval. Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following proposed resolution: RESOLUTION//96-65 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING ADDITION AT 5117 TUXEDO BLVD., LOTS 13 & 14, BLOCK 9, WHIPPLE, PID //24-117-24 43 0047. PZ//96-28. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.6 CASE//96-31: MINOR SUBDIVISION, RANDALL MORIARTY, 4536 DENBIGIt ROAD, LOTS 6, 5, & NELY 1/2 OF 4, BLOCK 2, PID 19-117-23 24 0008. City Manager Ed Shukle stated the applicant had requested this item to be pulled from the agenda. The Planning Commission had recommended denial and he was going to reapply with different plans. 1.7 CASE//96-32: VARIANCE FOR GARAGE/SECOND FLOOR ADDITION, RAYMOND BAYLOR, 4790 NORTHERN ROAD, 1/2 OF LOT 27 & W OF 28, SUBDIVISION OV LOTS 1 & 32, SKARP & LINDQUIST'S RAVENSWOOD, PID 18-117-23 33 0027.. Building Official Jon Sutherland stated the Planning Commission had many concerns and had recommended denial. The applicant, Raymond Baylor was present and stated to the Council his rebuttal to the Planning Commission's decisions. MOTION by Jensen to approve as the Staff recommended, directing staff to prepare a resolution of approval for the variance and bring it back to the Council at the July 9, 1996 meeting. Motion was seconded by Hanus and carried unanimously. Minutes - Mound City Council June 25, 1996 1.8 CASE //96-33: MINOR SUBDIVISION, BOYER BUILDING CORP., 2978 AND 298~_ PELICAN POINT CIRCLE, LOTS 13 & 14, BLOCK 1, PELICAN POINT, PID 19-117-23 42 0038 & 0039. Building Official Jon Sutherland stated the Boyer Building Corporation has applied for a minor subdivision to relocate a lot line in the manner required by Mound City Code Section 320. He stated the development consists of double units with a common wall that straddles the lot line. In the case of this unit, the commons wall was built in the wrong location and the developer is proposing to move the lot line to the common alignment position. The amount of the shift is less than one foot. Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution as proposed: RESOLUTION//96-66 RESOLUTION FOR 2978/2988 14, BLOCK 1, AND 31-0139. TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION PELICAN POINT CIRCLE, LOTS 13 & PELICAN POINT, PID//19-117-23 42 0038 PZ//96-33. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.9. ..CASE//96-34: GALEN & WANYCE THOSTENSEN, 5024 BARTLETT BLVD., LOT 6, BLOCK 3, JOHN S. CARLSON, PID 24-117-24 12 0002, VARIANCE FOR SHED~ Building Official Jon Sutherland stated this was reviewed by the Planning Commission last night, June 10, 1996 and the applicant requested it be on tonight's agenda. The applicant is seeking a variance to allow construction of a 10' x 10' portable storage building that will be nonconforming to the north front yard setback. Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following proposed resolution: RESOLUTION//96-67 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A NONCONFORMING SHED AT 5024 BARTLETT BLVD., LOT 6, BLOCK 3, JOHN S. CARLSON, PID//24-117-24 12 0002. PZ//96-34. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.10 SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF AN AMEND~n CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MEYER' A S MOUND SERVICE TO OPERATE AN UTO REPAIR BUSINESS AT 2620 COMMERCE BLVD. SUGGESTED DATE: JULY 9. 1996 4 Minutes - Mound City Council June 25, 1996 MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Jessen, and carried unanimously to set July 9, 1996 for a public hearing to consider the approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit for Meyer's Service to operate an auto repair business at 2620 Commerce Blvd. 1.11 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. There were none. 1.12 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT - STEPHANIE COON, 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE. Building Official Jon Sutherland stated the item was denied at the last Council meeting because of the private structures on public lands and this not being allowed. He suggested removing the playhouse and flag pole from the public land permit and allowing the applicants to replace the stairway and repair the retaining wall. Discussion referred to the Commons Task Force and their research and development of a plan to handle private structures on public lands. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Ahrens, and carried unanimously to direct the staff to prepare a resolution to be brought back to the Council on July 9, 1996, to include replacement of stairs and repair of retaining wail and to not deal with the structures at this time. 1.13 PROPOSAL FOR NEW DOCK LOCATIONS - LONGFORD ROAD, BRENSHELL HOMES/FINE LINE DESIGN. City Manager Ed Shukle stated the Park and Open Space Commission had recommended the developer shall repay the cost to the City for the survey of Longford Road ($605.00). Also, when the seven slip dock is planned, the length and width of each slip size shall be reviewed, and if something other than a slip size of 10' x 24' is planned, it shall be brought back to the Park Commission for review. They are recommending that these docks be added to the system. Mr. Behnke, the developer was present. Hanus questioned staff with regards to clarifying whether there is suitable shoreline left to use in the computation that Mound can still use within its license with the LMCD. There were questions regarding the Boat Storage Units (BSU's) and Water Storage Units (WSU's). Council thought the numbers that were used by the Parks Director were received from the LMCD. Mayor Polston suggested requesting a letter from the LMCD requesting the number of miles Mound has of Commons shoreline and the formula they use to calculate how many boats, docks are allowed. Ahrens wanted to see the Mound Dock Location Map showing our computation of shoreline. Ahrens wanted to see something on paper from the LMCD and she would also like them to attend the meeting when this is brought back to the Council. 5 Minutes - Mound City Council June 25, 1996 MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Ahrens, to direct staff to provide the Council with calculations and a Dock Location Map showing how the computations were done indicating exactly how much shoreline Mound has, and to have the LMCD confirm their computations and figures in writing regarding the amount of shoreline and formula for number of boats and docks for the City of Mound. 1.14 APPLICATION FOR A CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR WATER PUMP AND WATER LINE BY DONALD AND GERALDINE SWENSON, 4857 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOTS 5/6, BLOCK 14, DEVON, DOt~K SITE #43520, DEVON COMMON, TYPE C. Budding Official Jon Sutherland stated the applicant has requested a Construction on Public Lands Permit to allow a water pump and water line to be placed on Devon Common abutting their property at 4857 Island View Drive to accommodate for lawn sprinkling. There is an existing stairway on the commons used to access the applicant's dock site. It is procedure to update all existing encroachments n a site when a new Public Land Permit is applied for. The stairway is in acceptable condition. Staff d P--latming'C~mm~ss~_on recommend approval. Hanus questioned if the pump would have a structure over it. Then he stated there was plenty of plant screening. Ahrens moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution as proposed: RESOLUTION #96-68 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT FOR A WATER PUMP AND WATER LINE ON DEVON COMMONS ABUTTING 4857 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, DOCK SITE #43520. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.15 APPROVAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. PW 26-06-96. CSAII .110 AT THREE POINTS BLVD., HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT NO. 9514, AND AI, JTHORIZING MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AGREEMENT, City Manager Ed Shukle stated the Council had approved the preliminary plans for the traffic signal installation, approved a resolution and now the agreement needs to be approved and signed. MOTION by Polston, seconded by Jensen, and carried unanimously to approve the agreement for a traffic control signal at CSAH 110 and Three Points Blvd., and directing the Mayor and City Manager to sign agreement. 1.16 PETITION FOR TWO STOP SIGNS TO BE PLACED AT THE INTERSECTION OF LAMBERTON ROAD AND ISLAND VIEW DRIVE. (To be handed out Tuesday evening~ 6 Minutes - Mound City Council June 25, 1996 City Manager Ed Shulde stated there was a petition from the residents of Radnor Road, Lamberton Road and Island View Drive to install two stop signs at the intersection of Lamberton Road and Island View Drive. Officer Ewald had researched the request and stated the placement of the signs could be a problem with all of the close driveways in the area. He did recommend a reduced speed limit sign to lower the speed limit in the area. Chief Harrell had discussed this with Public Works Superintendent Oreg Skinner and it may be possible to install two stop signs in the area. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Jessen and carried unanimously to refer the stop sign request at Island View Drive and Lamberton Road back to staff so signs can be placed in a location to comply with the City Code. 1.17 RESCHEDULING THE SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING DUE TO THE PRIMARY ELECTION BEING HELD THAT DAY. SUGGESTED DATE: WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 11, 1996. City Manager Ed Shulde stated that the September 10, 1996 regular City Council meeting falls on the night of the Primary Election and needs to be rescheduled. The suggested date is Wednesday, September 11, 1996. MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen, and carried unanimously to re. schedule the regular Council Meeting of September 10, 1996 to Wednesday, September 11, 1996 the reason being the Primary Election will be held on Tuesday, September 10th. 1.18 1.19 PAYMENT OF BILLS. MOTION made by Polston, seconded by Jensen to authorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $193,683.23, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: MAY 1996 FINANCIAL REPORT AS PREPARED BY GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR. MINUTES OF THE JUNE 10, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION. MINUTES OF THE JUNE 13, 1996 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION. 7 Minutes - Mound City Council June 25, 1996 WE STILL NEED TWO MEMBERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING ON THE POLICE SERVICES STUDY SCHF~DULED FOR WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 1996, 7 PM, AT SHOREWOOD CITY HALL. PLEASE ADVISE ME AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WHO IS GOING TO ATTEND. Mayor Polston and Councilmember Jensen will attend this meeting. Ee SATURDAY, AUGUST 17, 1996 IS NOW BEING LOOKED AT FOR A RESCHEDULED MOUND CITY DAYS. IT IS BEING CALLED MOUND CITY ~DejaVue". SOME OF THE SAME ACTIVITIF_3 THAT TAKE PLACE ON THE SUNDAY OF THE USUAL CITY DAYS WEEKEND WOULD OCCUR AND THE FIREWORKS WOULD BE SET OFF THAT EVENING. THIS WILL BE FINALIZED SOON AND THE NECESSARY PERMITS WILL BE SECURED. DO YOU SEE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS APPROACH? Goose Situation - Mound Bay Park Hanus mentioned he had received calls regarding the goose droppings at Mound Bay Park early in the mornings during swimming lessons.. He asked if the company called Lake Restoration, one that the City uses, could be contacted to spray the grass at the park to rid the area of geese. City Manager Ed Shukle stated he would check with the parks maintenance people to have them clean there early in the mornings. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:57 PM. City Manager, Ed Shukle Attest: Acting City Clerk 8 RE~OLUTION 06-~ ~ RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A MINOR AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS FOR MEYER'S MOUND SERVICE LOCATED IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 2620 COMMERCE BLVD. LOTS 1, 2, 3 & S. 1/2 OF 47, 48, 49, BLOCK 9, PID'S 23-117-24 14 0043 & 0050 P&Z CASE//96-26 WHEREAS, Richard R. & Connie L. Meyer, Owners of Meyer's Mound Service, have applied for an amendment to their Conditional Use Permit to allow an Auto Repair Business, and; WHEREAS, Mound Zoning Ordinance Section 350:640 allows Minor Auto Repair Businesses in the B-1 Zoning District with a Conditional Use Permit, and; WHEREAS, Resolution/t79-427 approved a special (conditional) use permit for this property that allowed the operation of an automobile transmission repair facility with conditions that included no outside storage of parts, material and equipment; limited lighting; and no more than one car stored outside, and; WHEREAS, the applicant has requested parking for 25 vehicles, and; WHEREAS, complaints have been received about the overall appearance of the property and the number of vehicles parked on the site, the Building Official determined that the use of the property has changed substantially over the years without any update or modification of the conditional use permit, and; WHEREAS, in December of 1985, the Meyers purchased the residential property to the north of the auto service facility which is currently vacant and used for vehicle parking, and; WHEREAS, the gas pumps have been removed and sale of gasoline has discontinued, and; WHEREAS, the parking area currently has a gravel surface. The Zoning Code requires that all parking areas and access drives serving commercial property be paved with bituminous or concrete surfacing. The code also states that parking lots cannot be located closer than 5 feet from an adjacent lot zoned or used for residential purposes, and; WHEREAS, the code requires fencing along the east side of the parking lot. That provision requires that "a fence of adequate design, not over five (5) feet in height nor less than four (4) feet in height shall be erected along the Residential District property line," and; WHEREAS, City Code requires the screening of all dumpster enclosures. The original special use permit prohibited outside storage of parts, material and other equipment. The existing dumpster as well as all parts storage needs to be screened, and; Proposed Resolution Meyer's P. 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously recommended approval, with the conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council does hereby approve a conditional use permit for Meyer's Mound Service as a Minor Automobile ReP, air facility subject to the following conditions- a. Overnight parki~ offthe site shall be limited to the area north of the structure. All vehicles pa~ked on the site shall have current vehicle license tabs. The sale of vehicles on/the property i_s~prohibited. b. The ~ lot on the north side of the building shall be improved consistent with City ordinance requirements. Said improvement shall include but not be limited to bituminous surfacing and construction of required fencing. All trash and parts storage shall be screened. The applicant shall prepare and submit a screening plan for review and approval by the Mound Building Official. Any future changes in signage for the business shall comply with the Mound Sign Ordinance. Ail vehicle repair activities shall occur inside the building. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed one year from the date of City Council approval at no cost to the applicant. Tax parcels 23-117-24 14 0043 and 23-117-24 14 0050 shall be combined. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for the following legally described property: Lots 1, 2, 3, and the South half of 47, 48, and 49, Block 9, PID 23-117-24 14 0043 and 0050. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. .~00 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1996 CASE 96-26: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- MEYER'S MOUND SERVICE (PUBLIC HEARING). RICHARD & CONNIE MEYER, 2620 COMMERCE BLVD., LOTS 1, 2, 3 & S. 1/2 OF 47, 48, 49, BLOCK 9, PID 23-117-24 14 0043 & 0050 Mark Koegler, City Planner, reviewed the Planning Report. As a result of complaints received about the overall appearance of the property and the number of vehicles parked on the site, the Building Official determined that the use of the property has changed substantially over the years without any update or modification of the conditional use permit. A chronology of the site was reviewed. The gas pumps have been removed and sale of gasoline has discontinued. It is assumed that the underground gas tanks are still in place. It is important that Meyer's Mound Service have a conditional use permit that accurately reflects the business that is conducted on the site. Since the business has continued to grow and evolve over the past 15 years without updating the permit, there are now a number of ordinance requirements that apply to the property. Issues that need to be addressed in updating the conditional use permit include: Use of the property. The existing special use permit allows only transmission repair on the site. Based upon the application, materials submitted, it appears that the facility qualifies as a minor automobile repair business. On-site parking. The special use permit which has never been updated limits parking to one vehicle. The applicant has requested parking for 25 vehicles. Based on the 'capacity of the off-street parking area, it seems that limiting parking to 15 vehicles is consistent with the conditions placed on Shoreline Automotive is reasonable. Parking lot. The parking area currently has a gravel surface. The Zoning Code requires that all parking areas and access drives serving commercial property be paved with bituminous or concrete surfacing. The code also states that parking lots cannot be located closer than 5 feet from an adjacent lot zoned or used for residential purposes. The code also requires fencing along the east side of the parking lot. That provision requires that "a fence of adequate design, not over five (5) feet in height nor less than four (4) feet in height shall be erected along the Residential District property line." Trash and parts storage. City Code requires the screening of all dumpster enclosures· The original special use permit prohibited outside storage of parts, material and other equipment. The existing dumpster as well as all parts storage needs to be screened. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a conditional use permit for Meyer's Mound Service as a Minor Automobile Repair facility subject to the following conditions: Parking on the site shall be limited to a total of 15 vehicles. All vehicles parked on the site shall have current vehicle license tabs. The sale of vehicles on the property is prohibited. The parking lot on the north side of the building shall be improved consistent with City ordinance requirements. Said improvement shall include but not be limited to bituminous surfacing and construction of required fencing. All trash and parts storage shall be screened. The applicant shall prepare and submit a screening plan for review and approval by the Mound Building Official. Any future changes in signage for the business shall comply with the Mound Sign Ordinance. §. All vehicle repair activities shall occur inside the building. Mueller confirmed that other similar businesses used for comparison are Shoreline Automotive, Mound Collision and the old Arco (now-Glass Plus). Koegler confirmed that within the B-1 zone, minor auto repair is allowed by conditional use permit, and commented that the applicant can address what nature of repairs are done on-site, but believes it is consistent with the definition of minor auto repair. Chair Michael opened the public hearing. Steve Kladstrup, owner of 5668 Bartlett Blvd. which is located two houses to the east expressed a concern about future expansion of the business. Koegler noted that the surrounding property is zoned residential and this type of use is not allowed in a residential zone. Kladstrup noted that Meyer's repaired a broken timing belt on his car two weeks ago and noted that this is the type of work they do. Kladstrup stated that when the wind comes from the west trash from Meyer's blows into his property, and he has a collection of this trash to prove it. He feels that expansion of the business would have a detrimental affect on the neighborhood. Tom Reese, owner of 5641 Bartlett Blvd., stated that he feels the station provides a service to the community and it deserves to remain, but that it should be maintained so it is a benefit to Mound. He agrees with the planning report, however, feels 15 cars is a bit strong. He would suggest ten cars, otherwise he supports the rest of the report. He is also concerned about the signage as it is out of date. there is a concern in the neighborhood that this business be updated and made current. Richard Meyer, owner of the station, stated that when the complaint about the number of cars was received by the City was when it was very cold weather. He would like the Planning Commission to consider his request for 25 cars. Today they had 16 cars parked outside and there was room for more. In the winter he needs to be able to park more cars. Relating to condition #5, he stated that he would like the flexibility to allow quick repairs outdoors, such as replacing a fuse or a tire. He has no other concerns with the report. Relating to parking, he emphasized that he has four employees and himself, so five of the cars parked outside are the employee's vehicles which would only allow for ten customer vehicles. He stated that they rarely have more than five or ten cars parked overnight on the lot as most people drop off their vehicles a leave them during the day while they go to work. Chair Michael closed the public hearing. Mueller agreed that incidental repairs, such as replacing a fuse or a tire outside should not be a problem. He would be concerned about engine work being done outside. Mueller asked Mr. Meyer if he is okay with the condition relating to bituminous surfacing. Meyer said this condition is okay, however, expressed a concern about hardcover requirements. Koegler noted that this property is clearly in the shoreland district, and the property is limited to 30% hardcover, however, the current use existed in its current form since the early 80's, and gravel is viewed the same as bituminous by ordinance, so it would not be considered a change. Meyer confirmed that when the fuel tanks are removed, the island will also be removed. Voss asked what will happen if they violate this conditional use permit, and noted that the property has been in violation for the last 10 years. Sutherland noted that after they have been through this process, he will have a better relationship with the owners, Mueller questioned if there should be screening abutting 110. Voss suggested that screening may promote theft and vandalism. Koegler confirmed that screening is required only on the east side where it abuts residentially "zoned" property, and agreed that a fence on. the street side may be more obtrusive than seeing a neatly organized parking lot. Clapsaddle noted that fences just get dilapidated. Voss suggested they could limit the number of vehicles stored on the property at night. Hanus agreed that this could be done and stated that the Council approved three vehicles to be parked outside at Glass Plus overnight. Koegler noted that the Council had also required a one year review period for Glass Plus and this could be done for Meyer's. Weiland asked if there is a law that states when the gas tanks have to be removed once gas sales have discontinued. Sutherland noted that this would be a PCA or Fire Code, he thinks it is one year, but he can check. Meyer stated that he will take out the tanks this September and that the tanks are now empty. Meyer stated that he could easily park 25 cars on the north side of the building. He confirmed that repairs are done strictly on automobiles, there are no boat motor or snowmobile repairs done at the station. Weiland suggested they could limit parking to the north side of the building only. Voss expressed a concern about being consistent with what has been approved for other similar stations. Hanus commented that they also need to be careful not to restrict the growth of a business. Clapsaddle reviewed his concerns. Michael clarified with staff that there have been only about three complaints on this property in 13 years. Michael asked Mr. Kladstrup about the type of trash he finds on his property from .~/Jeyer's. Mr. Kladstrup clarified thnt h~ finric rne~int~ rnnnir t~nc tira Inhale I~^,n hn~, e~l~ tone rill ~h~nnz~ .-+;~-L.~.. [] I I I il, ,dllk~ it &,, etc. in his yard. Mueller stated the fence would help prevent garbage from blowing that way. Mueller asked if the fence would be placed on the top of the slope, and asked where is the property line is in relationship to the slope? Koegler stated that fortunately Meyer also owns the adjacent property, so he could put the fence on top of the slope if it is not on the gas station property. MOTION made by Mueller to recommend to the City Council that staff recommendation be approved with the conditions, including the following modifications: Overnight parking on the site shall be limited to the area north of the structure. °,,. ...... ,, ,v,..,' v,~' 15 ..~k:_,~..~,,,,.,~. All vehicles parked off the site shall have current vehicle license tabs. The sale of vehicles on the property is prohibited. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed one year from the date of City Council approval at no cost to the applicant· Motion seconded by Voss. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be reviewed by the City Council on July 9, 1996. CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-O600 FAX (612) 472-0620 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE NO. 96-26 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MEYER'S MOUND SERVICE TO OPERATE AN AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS AT 2620 COMMERCE BOULEVARD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 9, 1996 to consider the approval of an amended conditional use permit to allow the operation of an Auto Repair Business for Meyer's Mound Service at 2620 Commerce Boulevard, legally described as Lots 1, 2, 3, and the south half of 47, 48, and 49, Block 9, Mound Bay Park, PID's 23-117-24 14 0043 and 0050. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Peggy/Jainet, Planning Secretary Mailed to property oveners within 350 feet of affected property by June 28, 1996. Published in "The Laker" June 29, 1996. Creative Solutions for Land Planning and Design Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: June 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit APPLICANT: Richard R. And Connie L. Meyer CASE NUMBER: 96-26 HKG FILE NUMBER: 96-50 LOCATION: 2620 Commerce Boulevard EXISTING ZONING: Central Business District (B-1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial BACKGROUND: This item has been placed on the Planning Commission and City Council agendas as a result of complaints received about the overall appearance of the property and the number of vehicles parked on the site at various times. Upon receipt of the complaints, the Building Official examined the property file and determined that the use of the property has changed substantially over the years without any update or modification of the conditional use permit. From City records, the following is a brief chronology of the site: In October of 1979, the City of Mound approved a special (conditional) use permit for the property that allowed the operation of an automobile transmission repair facility with conditions that included no outside storage of parts, material and equipment; limited lighting; and no more than one car stored outside. At the time of the approval, the facility was operated (presumably owned) by Mr. Craig Olson. Mr. Olson was notified in November of 1979 that neighbors expressed concern about the appearance of the property. In February of 1985, Jan Bertrand, the Mound Building Official notified Mr. Meyer that he would need to secure a new conditional use permit due to changes in the business operation that included the repair of snowmobiles and exterior storage on the site. There is no record 7300 Metro Botil~-vard, Suite 525, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 (612) 835-9960 Fax (612) 835-3160 -2 ~o7 Meyer Conditional Use Permit Planning Report June 5, 1996 Page 2 of any application being made at the time nor is there any further correspondence between Ms. Bertrand and Mr. Meyer. In December of 1985, the Meyers purchased the residential property adjacent to the auto service facility and on May 15, 1987, the City of Mound issued a demolition permit for the home that was located on the lot. The house was subsequently demolished and became a vacant site that is currently used for vehicle parking. City records indicate that the residential property abutting the auto service facility on the east side is also owned by Mr. and Mrs. Meyer. Another change that is obvious in looking at the property is that at some point in the past, the gas pumps were removed and the sale of gasoline was discontinued. It is assumed that the underground gas tanks are still in place. The City is unaware of any time schedule for their removal. COMMENT: It is important that Meyer's Mound Service have a conditional use permit that accurately reflects the business that is conducted on the site. Since the business has continued to grow and evolve over the past 15 years without updating the permit, there are now a number of ordinance requirements that apply to the property. Some of the requirements can be met with minimal cost and others will be more costly to implement. Therefore, the City may want to consider allowing the owner to phase any required improvements over a multiple year basis. The following is an overview of the issues that need to be addressed in updating the conditional use permit: Use of the Property The existing special use permit allows only transmission repair on the site. Based on the types of repair that have traditionally occurred on the property since it was acquired by Mr. and Mrs. Meyer, the current use fits within the minor automotive repair classification of the ordinance. Minor automobile repair is identified as "the replacement of any part or repair of any part which does not require the removal of the engine head or pan, engine, transmission or differential; incidental body and fender work, minor painting and upholstering service when said service above is applied to passenger automobiles and trucks not in excess of 7,000 pounds gross vehicle weight." Any types of service more intensive than those defined as minor automobile repair are classified in the code as major automobile repair. Major automobile repair facilities are not allowed in the B-1 zone. Based upon the application materials submitted, it appears that the facility qualifies as a minor automobile repair business. Meyer Conditional Use Permit Planning Report June 5, 1996 Page 3 On-Site Parking The number of vehicles parked on the site has been the subject of public complaint. The special use permit which has never been updated limits parking to one vehicle. The applicant has requested parking for 25 vehicles. He further stated that maximum use of parking is likely to occur only on extremely hot and cold days which result in increases in business activities. In looking at defining a reasonable amount of parking to support the business, two factors need to be considered. First, the business is located in a prominent location in Mound's commercial area and it is very visible to the public. Therefore, appearance is an important issue. Second, the business has two repair bays which is common in other automobile repair businesses in Mound. Therefore, it is appropriate to examine parking limits placed on those businesses compared to the Meyer's Mound Service site. The most recent conditional use permit approved for an automotive service facility was the one for Shoreline Automotive that was approved by the City Council in 1995. That permit limits the total number of vehicles on the site to 15. Like Meyer's Mound Service, Shoreline Automotive has two repair bays, however, the Shoreline Automotive site is substantially larger than the one owned by Mr. and Mrs. Meyer. During a recent site visit, there were 12 vehicles parked on the property including a tow truck and an empty boat trailer. Based on the capacity of the off-street parking area, it seems that limiting parking to 15 vehicles consistent with the conditions placed on Shoreline Automotive is reasonable. Parking Lot The residential property that was demolished in 1985 is now used for parking to support the business. The parking area currently has a gravel surface. Section 350:760 of the Zoning Code requires that all parking areas and access drives serving commercial property be paved with bituminous or concrete surfacing. The ordinance also contains other provisions that apply to commercial parking lots. Section 350:760, Subd. 1 D. states that parking lots can not be located closer than 5 feet from an adjacent lot zoned or used for residential purposes. The lots located both north and east of the Meyer's property are used for residential purposes. Section 350:760, Subd. 3 D. requires fencing along the east side of the parking lot. That provision requires that "a fence of adequate design, not over five (5) feet in height nor less than four (4) feet in height shall be erected along the Residential District property line." Trash and Parts Storage At the present time, trash is stored on the site in a dumpster that sits along the west side of the building. Tires are stored at the rear of the building in an open rack and bins are located on the north Meyer Conditional Use Permit June 5, 1996 Page 4 side of the building to accommodate old car parts such as mufflers, tail pipes, etc. None of the trash or dumpster storage is screened. City Code requires the screening of all dumpster enclosures. The original special use permit for this site prohibited outside storage of parts, material and other equipment. The existing dumpster as well as all parts storage needs to be screened. Screening has been a common requirement for similar businesses such as Glass Plus and Shoreline Automotive. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a conditional use permit for Meyer's Mound Service as a Minor Automobile Repair facility subject to the following conditions: 1. Parking on the site shall be limited to a total of 15 vehicles. All vehicles parked on the site shall have current vehicle license tabs. The sale of vehicles on the property is prohibited. The parking lot on the north side of the building shall be improved consistent with City ordinance requirements. Said improvements shall include but not be limited to bituminous surfacing and construction of required fencing. 3. All trash and parts storage shall be screened. The applicant shall prepare and submit a screening plan for review and approval by the Mound Building Official. 4. Any future changes in signage for the business shall comply with the Mound Sign Ordinance. 5. All vehicle repair activities shall occur inside the building. Rev. 3-6-96 APplication for CONDITIONAL USE PERMYF City of l~ound 5341 MaI~ood Ro&4, Mo~n4, ~ 55364. Phone: 472-0600, F~: 472-0620 Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: ~ /~/ /ffg Case No. /~fg Conditional Use Permit Fee:. $200.00 Distribu__~tion: City Planner: City Engineer Public Works: Other: II Please ....... %~'e' .............. or print the following' .......... information' ........... ' ..... '''''''''''' .......... **' ...... INFORMATION I Name of Business /, x DESCRIPTION Subdivision ~~,~ APPLICANT The applicant is: ~owner other: Name OWNER {if other than Address applicant} Phone (H) (W) Name ARCHITECT, SURV~OR, OR Address ENGINEER Phone (H) (W) ZONING Circle: R-1 R-1A R-2 R-3 ~1~ DISTRICT CHANGE OF FROM: ~0 USE Conditional Use Permit Application Page 2 EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. Ey-r t~ F~ £ If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ ~6~D -- Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ~yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Propert~ owner's Signature Date ( tREOUIIRED STREET FFIONTAGE/WIDTH: LOT OF RECORD? YES REQUIRED SETBACKS PRINCIPAL BUILDIN(~t HOUSE FRONT: N $ E W .FRONT: N S E W SIDE: N S E W SIDE: N S E W REAR: N S E W LAKESHORE: TOP OF BLUFF: O/ 1,~' 50' (meas red ACCESSORY BUILDING/GARAGE/SHED 4' 9r §' 4' 9r §' 4' FRONT: N S E W FRONT: N S E W SIDE: N S E W SIDE: N S E W REAR: N S E W LAKESHORE: TOP OF BLUFF: frQrn Q.H.W.) 50' (measured from Q,H,W,I I ~ EXlSTIN___~G ANO/O._.__.~R PROPOSE~D SETBACKS.____=___._~ ~, FI~INI;IPAL BUILDING/HO¥$E ACCESSORY BUILDING/GARAGE/SHED ~ ~ FRONT: N S E W FRONT: N 'S'E W ~ I FRONT: N S E W ~ FRONT: N S E W ~ ~ I SIDE: N S E W ~ SIDE: N S E W ~ ~ ~ SIDE: N S E W ~ SIDE: N S E W ~ ~ { R~R: N S E W ~ REAR: N S E W ~ ~ I ~KESHORE: ~ LAKESHORE: ~ ~ J TOP OF BLUFF' ~ ~ I TOP OF BLUFF ~ ~ ~ }HA COVER C;NFORMING7 YES/NO // ' ' ' : ~ ~, ~_~r~.Zoning Informatio~ Sheet only summ,r,zes a portion ol ta requirements outlined in the Uity of Mound Zoning /"' rdinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 472-0600. ..~. ] .. , ~ --.~ --. ~ --' ~ . .. ... ,~ ..~-~ .....~,.,~- ~ ~ .. ,~.= ~ = ~ · .' '~ ,,'-~~.. ~'lU '~ ]'tt~;":l';;~tTt~. ~..."~""'~ t,~ ~%R ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' / · ~~,;~:~: ....... 2'-~",' :'--~o ~ H. ~ ~ ~ ~ o .' . I .....-'~" . t~'lu t ,, D~c~-~~CO RD NO't2~~' ~:~' ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ '/. ':~"" . t'~P "'fl · ~ ~ "~"°"1~~ ~ ~ ~.~' /.,.~,,, . .J/ ~/~ L ~ ~- ~ , ~ _ ~ · ~, .~ "?'.'.',~/'~--,1 ~':. ~:".-~ '. ~.~'~ ~ ,,; '.~ ,,., ~ ' ~ ~ . ..,, .~.., .... ..Z.~;:'~/,~F~ ! ~- , . , ', ' x .":.,'.z' "/'.' ~,t :'~ I t Z ~ ~ ,_'. (:.'~ ,."-:,:4'%- :. , ~1 ;~ ~ I' .~ ~ i ~ ~ "~-~.',, · ~ 4 ~' - ~ ~/ ~g~/ I ~ . i~a ~ ~,-...~ .... I~-: .~ ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ t~:,j~ ~', . ..'~ '....~ '. · .L~~ . :_- ~{:g ~ z ADDRESS: SURVEY ON FILE't YES~'~ YARI) CITY OF MOUND . ZONING INFORMATION SHE~ ,,__~~ ZONINODISTRI~,L~$IZ~IDTH: 6,000/40 R2 6,000/40 B3 10,000/60 R2 14,000/80 R3 SE8 ORD. Z1 30,000/100 W N S NS E W Ill)USE ......... FRONT FRONT -SIDE SIDE REAR LAKE TOP OF BLUFF REQUIRED { EX] SI'LNG II"RO IN.)SI~ u LOT~: / VARIANCE $0' 10' OR SUED ..... OR OTHER DETACIIED BUILDINGS N $ E W N S E W FRONT FRONT SIDE SIDE N S E w N S E W 4' OR 6' 4'OR 6' REAR N S E W 4' LAKE N S E W TOP OF BLUFF 10' OR 30' tllARDCOVER ~ CONFORMINO? YEs/ This 7.ning Informnii,m Sheel 0nlv Plnnninl {~pm'~ment at 47243600. f?_i ,-' portion of Ihe r~e~s oultined in the City of Mound loninI Ordln~e. For ~r~er inform~iou, coati il Clly of M~Id NO o 0 O am. i February 14, 1996 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 Mr. Richard Meyer 2620 Commerce Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 SUBJECT: MEYER'S PEOPLES PLUS SERVICE Dear Mr. Meyer: Thank you for your time on the phone the other day discussing your business operation and the application of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) that was issued in 1979. Our conversation was generated due to a recent complaint referring to an excessive number of vehicles parked on the site. As we discussed, the CUP was issued to the previous owner and you have been conducting your auto repair business without significant change for about 15 years. The only change that I am aware of is the removal of gas pumps sometime in 1995 and this has allowed you a little extra parking space. Your current business is minor auto repair which is a conditional use in the B-1 Zone. The attached copy of the CUP issued in 1979 is not applicable today as it only allows for one vehicle to be stored outside, therefore, you must update the permit to accurately reflect your present use. The CUP process is outlined in the enclosed application. Our City Planner will prepare a staff report, which will be reviewed by the Planning Commission, then they will make a recommendation to the City Council who will take final action. Please contact myself or Peggy James of this department if you would like to go over the application. Note, the application deadline of March 21, 1996 that we discussed. Respectfully, ...... ~ JiSn Su'~t'~and Building Official JS:pj Enclosures (~ prmted on recycled paper 5341 MiAYWOOO IvlOUND, MINi'4ESO1 A (6'i21 472-'~ 1!,5 February 27, 1985 Mr. & Mrs. Richard Meyer 2620 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Meyer: I am writing you to remind you of our conversation regarding your business operation conditional use permit restrictions for your prop- erty at 2620 Commerce Boulevard. On January 14, 1985, we met to go over the procedure for filing an amended conditional use permit to allow some revisions to your current business operation. To date, I have not received an application to resolve the sale and repair of snowmobiles, the exterior storage on the site, and certain site limitations. We need to clarify the present use within the next few weeks. The next Planning Commission Board of Appeals meeti.ng is April 8, 1985. I will need the application, site plan, fee and prop- erty owners' list submitted to my office by March 20, 1985. I have enclosed, 'for your convenience, the application and the zoning ordi- nance provisions of the B-1 district (Pages 41 & 42 with Pages 25 through 28, the Conditional Use Per?it explanations). If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, jan~Bertlnd~ Building Official JB/ms 10/85 cc: Jon Elam Encl. 459 October 9, 1979 Councilmember Withhart moved the following resolution, RESOLUTION NO. 79 - 427 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANTING OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH THE STIPULATIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION & NO OUTSIDE STORAGE OF PARTS, MATERIALS OR OTHER EQUIPMENT BE ALLOWED. WHEREAS, owner of property described as Lots 1, 2 and W 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 9, Mound Bay Park, has applied for a Special Use Permit for an Automobile Transmission Repair in a Limited Commercial zone, and ~.~ WHEREAS a public hearing was held and Planning Commission indicated approval same with stipulations, NOW, THEREFORE, BE It RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND,' MINNESOTA: That Council does hereby grant the Special Use Permit as requested with the following stipulations: Atte~t:~ CMC City Clerk No outside storage of parts, material and other equipment Lights and signs to be limited and no more than one car stores outside. A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Swenson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; Lovaasen, Swenson, Polston and Wtihhart, the following voted against the same; none, with Ulrick being absent; whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. M~yor ~ ~ ADDRESS: ZONE: REQ. LOT AREA: EXIST. LOT AREA: SURVEY ON FILE7 YE LOT OF RECORD? YES REQUIRED STREET FRONTAGE/WIDTH: REQUIRED SETBACKS .P, RINCIPAL BUILDING/HOUSF FRONT: N S E W FRONT: N S E W SIDE: N S E W SIDE: N S E W REAR: N S E W 15' LAKESHORE: 50' (meas red TOP OF BLUFF: from O.H.W.) ACCESSORY BUILDING/GARAGE/SHED FRONT: N S E W FRONT: N S E W SIDE: N S E W _4' or 6' SIDE: N S E W 4' or 6' REAR: N S E W 4' LAKESHORE: 50' {measured from O.H.W.I TOP OF BLUFF: EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED SETBACKS: ..PRINCIPAL BUILDING/HOUSE FRONT: N S E W FRONT: N S E W SIDE: N S E W SIDE: N S E W REAR: N S E W LAKESHORE: TOP OF BLUFF: ACCESSORY BUILDING/GARAGE/SHED FRONT: N S E W FRONT: N S E W SIDE: N S E W SIDE: N S E W REAR: N S E W LAKESHORE: ~ TOP OF BLUFF: HAP/BICOVER CONFORMING7 YES / NO / IS THIS PROPERTY CONFORMING? YES / NO Fhis G'~rfer~ Zoning Information Sheet only summarizes a porlion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 472-0600. ;o _ C'J~0 O CITY OF MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SHEET ADDRESS: SURVEY ON FILE'/ YESd NO) LOT OF RECORE NO YARD IIOUSE ......... FRONT FRONT SIDE SIDE REAR LAKE TOP OF BLUFF W N S N S E W ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: R1 10,000/60 ~ R1A 6,000/40 R2 6,000/40 B3 10,000/60 R2 14,000/80 R3 SEE ORD. Z1 30,000/100 REQUIRED EXISTING/PROPOSED 50' I0' OR 30' LOT WIDTH: LOT DEPTH: VARIANCE GARAGE, SllED ..... OR OTHER DETACHED BUILDINGS FRONT FRONT SIDE SIDE REAR LAKE TOP OF BLUFF HARDCOVER ~--~ CONFO~INO? YF~ This Zoning Information Sheet only Planning Department at 472-~. NS E W N S E W N S E W 4'OR6' N S E W 4'OR6' N S E W 4' NS E W 50' 10' OR 30' I BY h tX n summarizes a portion of the r~uir~ oullined ia th I DATED: ~-~'~ City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound CO 0 O0 O0 0 0 CITY OF MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SHEET LOT OF RECORD? YES I NO R3 YARD DIRECTION REQUIRED llOUSE ......... ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: Ri 10,000/60 ~ RZA 6,000/40 6,000/40 B3 10,000/60 14,000/80 SEE ORD. 11 30,000/100 EXISTING/PROPOSED LOT DEPTH: VARIANCE SIDE SIDE REAR N ~..,E w N~ w N S E W LAKE TOP OF BLUFF 10 OR 30' GARAGE, SIIED ..... OR OTHER DETACHED BUILDINGS FRONT N S E W FRONT N S E W SIDE N S E W 4* OR6' SIDE N S E W 4' OR 6' REAR N S E W 4' LAKE N S E W 50' TOP OF BLUFF 10' OR 30' HARDCOVER CONFORMING.'? Y This Zoning Information Sheet only .~ los oR4os ~. summarizes a portion of the requiremet'~ outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound RF~OLUTION #96.~/~/~ RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY ADDITION AT 4790 NORTHERN ROAD, E. 1/2 OF LOT 27 & W 1/2 OF 28 SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 & 32, SKARP & LINDQUIST'S RAVENSWOOD PID 18-117-23 33 0027 P&Z CASE//96-32 WHEREAS, the owner, Raymond Baylor, has applied for a variance to construct a garage addition and a second story addition, as follows: Front yard setback: the proposed garage addition with second story living space above is to be located approximately .7 feet from the property line resulting in a 19.3 foot front yard setback variance. The garage door will open to the side lot line. Side yard setback: the west side of the existing home is located 5.9 feet from the lot line which is. 1 feet under the 6 foot requirement. WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-lA Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet, a 20 foot front yard setback, 6 foot side yard setbacks for lots of record, and a 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water (OHW) elevation, and; WHEREAS, the existing deck will either be reconstructed or modified to remove a small appendage that extends within the 50 foot setback requirement. WHEREAS, Northern Road is one of the tightest neighborhood areas in the City of Mound. The land area is limited by the location of the lakeshore and the County Road. Variances will be necessary in this area to afford property owners reasonable use of their land, and; WHEREAS, according to the survey, the elevation of the lowest finished floor of the home is 932.77 and the structure has a crawl space that is at an elevation of 929.04. Both these elevations are under the minimum floodplain elevation for Lake Minnetonka which is 933.0, and; WHEREAS, the entire lot is located within the existing floodplain. As such, it will require Watershed District approval of the minor amount of fill necessary to construct the garage and raise the floor elevation. The applicant will also need to prepare a detailed grading and drainage plan identifying pertinent elevations and showing compensation measures as applicable, and; WHEREAS, the proposed improvements will substantially upgrade the existing home while affording the owner reasonable use of the property. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended denial. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City does hereby approve the front yard setback variance of 19.3 feet and side yard setback variance of. 1 feet subject to the following conditions: a. The floor elevation of the existing home shall be.raised to a minimum elevation of 933.0. Proposed Resolution Baylor P. 2 The applicant shall prepare a grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. Said plan shall contain contours and spot elevations necessary to permit a full assessment of the grading impacts of the proposed improvements including, but not limited to compensation measures to comply with floodplain requirements. Co The applicant shall secure required approvals by the watershed district and other applicable agencies. do Construction of new improvements shall be in conformance with the Mound floodplain regulations. e. The existing storage shed shall be removed from the property. The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 350:420, Subdivision 8 of the Zoning Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land: Construction of a 22' x 25' garage addition with a 20' x 42' second story. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: The East Half of Lot 27, and the West Half of Lot 28, Subdivision of Lots I & 32, Skarp and Lindquist's Ravenswood. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. RECEIVED JUN 1 9.1996 june is, 1996 'MOUND PLANNING & INJP. In response to the City of Molmd Planning Commission's rulings on June 10, 1996, I respectively 'submit the following rebuttals for your review at the meeting scheduled for June 25, 1996. Snow Removal . A. Proposg~ structure would measure 4:M~ from curb on west side; 6~-~'~om curb on east s~de. (See photo). ' .B.' Existing shed, power pole and garageSare now located in area in question. II. Over-building and over-usage of the?operty. A. proposed plan is 810 square feet under hardeover maximum allowed for lot. B. 2.2' garage 1. City Planner stated size is not excessive. 2. Mueller stated similar situations (22') have been addressed on Ridgewood, Edgewater and Island View. 3. City Planner stated that proposed improvements will substantially , upgrade the existing home while affording the owner reasonable use of the property. III. Tuck-under garage Ao 'B. Vaulted Ceiling' 1. Tuck-under garage would de,grade the tog construction of the existing ' home. (See photo) Square Footage 1o Tuck-under garage would decrease g~ound floor square footage by almost 50%. From 1040 sq. ft. to 540 sq. ft. ~ a. Living, dining, kitchen and entry, areas ~vould have to be accommodated in 540 square feet. Thank you for your consideration. Sin.~qerely, 'Rfiyrfiohd Baylor 4790 Northern Road Mound., MN 55364 (6'12) 472-5052 ~' ~"'~/[YLOR~4790 NORTHERN ROAD, E._I_/~ Uh LU--/-- ~ vv ,,= ur ~v, 33 002' '~J~ OF LOTS I & 32, SKARP & LINDQUI~I S RAVENSWOOD, PID 18-117-23 City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the Planning Report. The applicant is seeking variances to construct a garage addition, decks, and a second story addition. Northern Road is one of the tightest neighborhood areas in the City of Mound. The land area is limited by the location of the lakeshore and the County Road. Variances will be necessary in this area to afford property owners reasonable use of their land. The following addresses each of the variance issues applicable to this case: 1. Front Yard Setback - the plan shows a new attached garage with second story living space located on the front of the lot approximately .7 feet from the property line resulting in a 19.3 foot variance. The garage door opens to the side lot line eliminating the need to directly back into Northern Road. The face of the proposed garage door is approximately 28 feet from the western property line. Although the proposed garage is extremely close to the street, there is no reasonable method of locating a conforming garage on the lot. The proposed depth of the garage (22') is not excessive and as evidenced by materials stored along the side of the home, a garage is needed for storage. Upon approval and commencement of construction, an existing storage shed on the lot will be removed. Side Yard Setback - the west side of the existing home is located 5.9 feet from the lot line which is .1 feet under the 6 foot requirement. Relocation of the existing structure to a conforming location is not recommended by staff since it would qualify as a "practical difficulty" situation. Lakeshore Setback - It appears from the plans that the existing deck will either be reconstructed or modified to remove a small appendage that extends towards Lake Minnetonka. At its closest point, the deck is approximately 47 feet from the lake which is under the 50 foot setback requirement. Since it appears that the deck will be either rebuilt or modified, the deck should be brought into conformance with the lakeshore setback requirement. The deck that is shown on the plans on the second level of the home conforms to setback requirements. Floodplain Elevation - According to the survey, the elevation of the lowest finished floor of the home is 932.77 and the structure has a crawl space that is at an elevation of 929.04. Both these elevations are under the minimum floodplain elevation for Lake Minnetonka which is 933.0. The proposed improvements constitute a maior reconstruction of the existing home. In previous cases of a similar nature, conditions of approval have included raising the floor elevations above the minimum flood~evel. Raise the elevation of the floors of this home would also be appropriate. In addition to the floodplain elevation issue, the entire lot is located within the existing floodplain. As such, it will require Watershed District approval of the minor amount of fill necessary to construct the garage and raise the floor elevation. The applicant will also need to prepare a detailed grading and drainage plan identifying pertinent elevations and showing compensation measures as applicable. The proposed improvements will substantially upgrade the existing home while affording the owner reasonable use of the property. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the front yard setback and side yard setback variances subject to the following conditions: The floor elevation of the existing home shall be raised to a minimum elevation of 933.0. The applicant shall prepare a grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. Said plan shall contain contours and spot elevations necessary to permit a full assessment of the grading impacts of the proposed improvements including, but not limited to compensation measures to comply with floodplain requirements. The applicant shall secure required approvals by the watershed district and other applicable agencies. Construction of new improvements shall be in conformance with the Mound floodplain regulations. 5. The existing storage shed shall be removed from the property. The Commission confirmed that staff is recommending the existing house be raised .23 feet. Staff clarified that if more than 50% of house is being altered, the existing is required to be brought into conformance. Sutherland noted that this case was reviewed with the DNR, and there are some acceptable methods of construction by allowing the floodplain to come into a crawl space, however, to get through this process they would need a civil engineer to prepare the plans. Weiland expressed a concern about snow removal and asked where the snow will go when they plow the street. Koegler commented that fortunately, in this area, the other side of the road is undeveloped, and therefore the snow can be directed to one side of the street, away from the garages. Weiland stated that this property would be over-built and considers this proposal as over- usage of the property. Hanus asked if the size of the garage could be reduced to be only 20 feet wide, which would allow for 2 more feet on the street side. Mueller commented that a 22 foot wide garage is not bad, and noted they have dealt with similar situations on Ridgewood, Edgewater, and Island View, and this property has the benefit of being able to push snow to the other side of the street. He feels this is a good improvement. Reifschneider stated that there are options that would be less encroaching, such as building a second story all the way across with a tuckunder garage. The owner stated that he wants to keep the vaulted ceiling in the existing portion of the home and noted that this home is a log house on the inside, and does not want to disturb the existing logs. Clapsaddle commented that this situation is the nature of the neighborhood. Clapsaddle moved staff recommendation. Mueller seconded the motion. Motion failed 4 to 5. ThOse in favor were: Clapsaddle, Michael, Mueller, and Hanus. Those opposed were Reifschneider, Weiland, Voss, Glister, and Burma. Motion made by Voss to recommend denial of the variance as requested. '~. Motion seconded by Glister. Motion to deny carried 5 to 4. Those in ,// favor were: Reifschneider, Weiland, Voss, Glister, and Burma. Those opposed were Clapsaddle, Michael, Mueller, and Hanus. This case will be reviewed by the City Council on June 25, 1996. Creative Solutions for Land Planning and Design Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: June 5, 1996 SUBJECT: Variances APPLICANT: Raymond Baylor CASE NUMBER: 96-32 HKG FILE NUMBER: 96-5k LOCATION: 4790 Northern Road EXISTING ZONING: Single Family Residential (R-IA) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking variances to substantially improve an existing home. Proposed construction includes a new garage, decks, and a second story addition over the garage and portions of the existing residence. The second story addition will contain bedrooms and bathrooms. Construction of the proposed improvements will require the issuance of front and side yard variances and the case presents lakeshore setback and floodplain nonconformities that must be addressed. COMMENT: Northern Road is one of the tightest neighborhood areas in the City of Mound. The land area is limited by the locations of the lakeshore and the County Road. Because of natural and man-made constraints, it is virtually impossible to add land area to any of the lots in the neighborhood. As a result, variances will be necessary in this area to afford property owners reasonable use of their land. The following addresses each of the variance issues applicable to this case: Front Yard Setback - The plans show a new attached garage with second story living space located on the front of the lot approximately .7 feet from the property line resulting in a 19.3 foot variance. The garage door opens to the side lot line eliminating the need to directly back into 7300 Metro Bo~tevard, Suite 525, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 (612) 835-9960 Fax (612) 835-3160 Baylor Planning Report June 5, 1996 Page 2 portions of Northern Road. The face of the proposed garage door is approximately 28 feet from the western property line. Although the proposed garage is extremely close to the street, there is no reasonable method of locating a conforming garage on the lot. The proposed depth of the garage (22') is not excessive and as evidenced by materials stored along the side of the home, a garage is needed for storage. Upon approval and commencement of construction, an existing storage shed on the lot will be removed. 2. Side Yard Setback - The west side of the existing home is located 5.9 feet from the lot line which is. 1 feet under the 6 foot requirement. Relocation of the existing structure to a conforming location is not recommended by staff since it would qualify as a practical difficulty situation. 3. Lakeshore Setback - It appears from the plans that the existing deck will either be reconstructed or modified to remove a small appendage that extends toward Lake Minnetonka. At its closest point, the deck is approximately 47 feet from the lake which is under the 50 foot setback requirement. Since it appears that the deck will be either rebuilt or modified, the deck should be brought into conformance with the lakeshore setback requirement. The deck that is shown on the plans on the second level of the home conforms to setback requirements. 4. Floodplain Elevation - According to the survey, the elevation of the lowest finished floor of the home is 932.77 and the structure has a crawl space that is at an elevation of 929.04. Both of these elevations are under the minimum floodplain elevation for Lake Minnetonka which is 933.0. The proposed improvements constitute a major reconstruction of the existing home. In previous cases of a similar nature, conditions of approval have included raising the floor elevations above the minimum flood level. Raising the elevation of the floors of this home would also be appropriate. In addition to the floodplain elevation issue, the entire lot is located within the existing floodplain. As such it will require watershed district approval for the minor amount of fill necessary to construct the garage and raise the floor elevation. The applicant will also need to prepare a detailed grading and drainage plan identifying pertinent elevations and showing compensation measures as applicable. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed improvements will substantially upgrade the existing home while affording the owner reasonable use of the property. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the front yard setback and side yard setback variances subject to the following conditions: 1. The floor elevation of the existing home shall be raised to a minimum elevation of 933.0. Baylor Planning Report June 5, 1996 Page 3 o The applicant shall prepare a grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. Said plan shall contain contours and spot elevations necessary to permit a full assessment of the grading impacts of the proposed improvements including but not limited to compensation measures to comply with floodplain requirements. The applicant shall secure required approvals by the watershed district and other applicable agencies. Construction of new improvements shall be in conformance with the Mound floodplain regulations. The existing storage shed shall be removed from the property. (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620 ~ RECEIVED HAY 2 3 Case No. Planning Commission Date: City Council Date: )istribution____ _ : City Planner ~ D~ ! City Engineer Ot~er" Public Works SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) Address ~-TqO /t)DE'7 Subdivision ~ / ZONING DIST~CT R~i ~ ~ R-2 R-3 B-1 Phone (I-I) ~"77--- ~~-- Block -" Plat # B-2 B-3 Name Address Phone (H). (W) .(M) Has an application ever been made,,fc)r zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ,~.no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Detailed descripton of proposed construction or alteration (si,z~, number of stories, type of use, etc.): ~" ,~/ O~9~''' ,Rev. 12/8/95) Variance Application, P. 2 Case No. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulat/ons for the zon/ng district in which it is located? Yes ~No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, 'lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ( ~ W ) 20 ft. ft. ft. Side Yard: ( N S~....) ~ ft. ft. ft. Side Yard: ( NS ]EI~,)) . .~ ft. ft. ft. Rear Yard: ( N_...S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: ~ E W ) _~-O ff. ft. ff. : (NSEW) ft. ft. ff. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ff Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes~, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: o Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: (Re';. 12/8/95) Vsriance Application, P. 3 Case No. e Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone, having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~. If yes, explain: Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? No ~. If yes, explain: Yes (), o Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ~, No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature s, nature_ Date ~J///~ ~/~/~ Date~-/~/~f<~ LAK~ MIN.NETo NKA EXISTING HOUSE "~-- S 85036` 3n,, . --' -' --- -- ~ "~60.00 ; ' survey I L, I I ' I I ! ! 0 l' "-' ' ! I I Lr) I 0 ! D e~c k .o) ' I (930.9)., , ~o.o EXISTING ! EXISTNG ! . (95Z.77)lo~.s~ ! ., ,,,~,. , ~. HOUSE ,~,:~HOUSE '*(?2?.O~')cra.4 i ,I CaF I ' ~"' ! wmIk ' , ~q N ~ EXISTINO i~ ~ ' moss cut .~ I ~.0 ' co.rate .... (970.7) ~c. N '" N 85°36, 30" W' 60.00 .~../'"'~, ~ ~, ,~ ~x ORTHERN o,. ROAD LEOAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : The Et:st Half of Lot 27, and the West Half of Lot 28, Subdivision ,.,..~. of Lots 1 &32, Skarp and Lindquist, s Ravenswood. ~ ~ ..... o ' denotes iron marker -. (947.5) · denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends Lo show the boundaries of the above described property, the Iocatior.~=)=~. of un existing house and shed, and the location of all visible "hardcover" thereon. It deco not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR RAY BAYLOR IN LOTS 27, AND 28, SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 &:32, SKARP &: LINDQUISTS RAVENSWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RECEIVED HAY 3 0 1996 MOUND PLANNING & INSR LAKE: LOT M'IN'NE TONKA .~.- S 85o36, 30" ~. ..... -F- 60.00 -. 'r,~,o. ej survey ~7 LOT 2,3 I .... ~ ~.-~ I I I \ I ! I I o ,ic k \ I"~ EXISTING: I F.':?.~.~'.°! .... ~ (,30.,)., ~ ,' j/It. HOUSE EXlSTI .,~/f ~.~..~ ~ ~] / I [ HOUSE ~o~t t"'~q ~ I ..... //I " a / ~ '~,' ~l.t wo~k'-~ll~ /o "'~*".~-4 ~0~; ~.o 111~ ]I . · .......~ ~ . II[' II [~o.~) ~ (,~.~)"- N 85~6, aO" w 60.00 · :.~" '"~ ~ ~. ~ ~ o., NORTHERN {,~j~ ,. o~ ... ~ ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : The E~st Holf of Lot 27, ond the West Half of Lot 28, Subdivision of Lots 1 &32, Skorp ond Lindquist's Rovenswood. o : denotes iron marker (947.5) : denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum Bearings shown ore based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, the location of on existing house ond shed, Grid the tocotion of oll visible "hardcover" thereon. It does not purport to show ony other improvements or encroachments. ~ot-et THERE I$ NO 931.5 CONTOUR LINE: oN THE: PROPERTY'. (929. O~) : crawl Sp~ce elev~fio.. .... RECEIVED.' CITY. OF MOUND HARDOOVER CALCULATIONS HAY 3 0 J§95 ' (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) ' . MOUND..PLANN~NG & INSR LOT AREA LOT AREA LOT AREA _ .SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all 10ts) .............. SQ. FT. X 40% - ( or Lots of ReCord*) ....... ., SQ. ~T. x 15% = .(for detached buildings only) eExiscJng Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques ar outlined in Zoning Ordiner~e Section 350:1225,$ubd. 6. B. 1. {see beck). A plan must am:l 'approved by the Building Official. HOUSE LENGTH ' WIDTH TOTAL HOUSE DETACHED BLDG$ (GARAGE/SHED) X X X SQ FT x ~ .,, _STZ X = TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS ............ TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC X _ X TOTAL DECK TOTAL OTHER DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, $1DEWALX:$, ETC. DECKS O~n d. ak. (,/4' ,',',in. o~oning between b~.~} ~.~th ~ not courted ~ ~rd¢o~ OTHER Jtilized, as submit-ted TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ~'"'1/OVER [ir~icate d;fference) ' I I t I I I ~ ~ BAYLOR REMODEL SCHULTZ DESIGN ~409 ~=.AST LAKE ST * ORONO. UN. 65.156 * (612) 449-6947 izm'~l, BAYLOR REMODEl. UOUND, UN i ~ BAYLOR REMODEL SCHULTZ DESIGN BAYLOR REMODEl, CITY OF MOUND - ZONING ;URVEY ON FILE? YES /~ YARD ] DI REL~ION ~ ~QUI~D IlOUSE ......... N S E W swE ~ s E ~ / LAKE S E W TOP OF BLUFF (~R 30' SI~ ..... OR OT~ BUI FRO~ E W FRO~ N S E W SIDE N S E W 4'OR6' SIDE H S E W 4'OR6' INFORMATION SHEET ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: R1 10,000160 BX 7,500/0 .'~T~-~G,ooo/n0~} .2 2o,ooo/8o ~ ~;ooo/4o B3 ~0,000/60 R2 ~4,000/80 S~ ORD. Z! 30,000/~00 EXIS'HNGIPROPOSED / 18-11 REAR N S E W 4' This Zoning ..,,rmatlo. Sheet only~;~izes a port'on of the ,.q~,~ents oufl,ned in the City of Mound Zoning Ordin.ce. For ,,,er in,rmatlo., conmct ,e City Planning Dep~ment at 472~6~. PROPOSED RESOLUTION//96- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW PRIVATE STRUCTURES ON PUBLIC LAND FOR STEPHANIE COON, INCLUDING A STAIRWAY, RETAINING WALL, AND PLANTINGS LOCATED ON DEVON COMMON ABUTTING 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE DOCK SITE//42314 WHEREAS, Stephanie Coon, owner of 4729 Island View Drive, has applied for a Special Permit to allow private structures on public land known as Devon Common, including a stairway, retaining wall, and; WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a four-fifths vote for Construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, and; WHEREAS, this area of Devon Common, Dock Site //42314, is classified as a Type C Common, meaning, "Shoreline with nontraversable space; stairs needed to shoreline, not accessible by public right-of-way (abutting property owners only)", and; WltEREAS, Stephanie Coon and Michael Pride have requested to replace the stairway, repair and paint the existing cement retaining wall, paint the trim on the playhouse, and install plantings to screen the retaining wall, and; WHEREAS, the playhouse and flag pole is non conforming to the shoreland and zoning ordinances, and according to the City Code 320, the playhouse should be brought into conformance within three years, and; WHEREAS, Stephanie Coon has agreed to assume responsibility of the playhouse, and; WHEREAS, the Park and Open Space Commission reviewed this request and recommended approval, including the playhouse, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the Commons Task Force to review the impact of structures on public land and therefore an action is pending regarding structures until completion of the Task Force review and recommendation to the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve a Special Permit to allow private structures on public land known as Devon Common for Stephanie Coon, owner of the abutting property, 4729 Island View Drive, subject to the following conditions: Proposed Resolution #96- Page 2 July 9, 1996 o The permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of City Council approval. Permits must be renewed with change in dock license holders. All conditions of approval must be completed within one (1) year of approval by City Council or the dock licensee will be withheld until completion. The stairway may be replaced. The new stairway shall be constructed according to code and approved by the Building Official. The retaining wall may be repaired and painted with a neutral color. Plantings/bushes must be installed at the base of the retaining wall to screen the wall, and also bushes on top of the wall shall be installed, as outlined in the Shoreland Management Ordinance. Prior to installation, a plan describing the type of plantings shall be submitted and approved by the Parks Director. Plantings should not block or hinder access along the commons. No action is taken regarding the flag pole and playhouse and they may remain, (with the exception that the trim may be painted on the playhouse). Staff will return these two items to the Council after the Council has reviewed and responded to the Commons Task Force's recommendations. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: Acting City Clerk MI2NUTF~ - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - MAY 28, 1996 1.12 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERM'IT FOR 4729 ISLAND YlEW DRIVE, STEPHANIE COON//42314. City Manager Ed Shukle stated Ms. Coon has applied for a special permit to allow for private structures on public land, known as Devon Common, for a stairway, retaining wall, plantings, electric outlet and lights, flag pole and playhouse. Jessen stated she could not approve this activity on the commons as it is public land and private structures do not belong there. Jensen stated private buildings do not belong on public lands, nor is she in favor of lights on public lands. Discussion related to the Commons Task force and pulling this permit off until they make their recommendations regarding private structures on public land. Ahrens stated the applicant wanted to repair the stairs and if the total item were pulled from the agenda, they could not repair them. Councilmember Ahrens moved and RESOLUTION #96- Councilmember Hanus seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW PRIVATE STRUCTURES ON PUBLIC LAND FOR STEPHANIE COON, INCLUDING A STAIRWAY, RETAINING WALL, ELECTRIC OUTLET & LIGHTS, FLAG POLE, PLANTINGS AND A PLAYHOUSE, LOCATED ON DEVON COMMON ABUTTING 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, DOCK SITE $42314. The vote was called resulting a 3-2 pass. Jessen and Jensen voted nay. See Note: In checking the City Code, a 4/5 vote is required to approve construction on public right-of-way. Therefore, the item did not pass, it failed. The applicant will be notified and the item will return to the Council at a future date. PROPOSED RESOLUTION #96- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW PRIVATE STRUCTURES ON PUBLIC L]%ND FOR STEPHANIE COON, INCLUDING A STAIRWAY, RETAINING WALL, ELECTRIC OUTLET & LIGHTS, FLAG POLE, PLANTINGS AND A PLAYHOUSE LOCATED ON DEVON COMMON ~BUTTING 4?29 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE DOCK SITE #42314 WHEREAS, Stephanie Coon, owner of 4729 Island View Drive, has applied for a Special Permit to allow private structures on public land known as Devon Common, including a stairway, retaining wall, plantings, electric outlet and lights, flag pole and playhouse, and; WHEREAS, city Code Section 320, requires city Council approval by a four-fifths vote for Construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, and; WHEREAS, this area of Devon Common, Dock Site #42314, is classified as a Type C Common, meaning, "Shoreline with nontraversable space; stairs needed to shoreline, not accessible by public right-of-way (abutting property owners only)", and; WHEREAS, Stephanie Coon and Michael Pride have requested to replace the stairway, install lights along the stairs, repair and paint the existing cement retaining wall, and install plantings to screen the retaining wall, and; WHEREAS, Stephanie Coon has agreed to assume responsibility of the playhouse, and; WHEREAS, the Park and Open Space Commission reviewed this request and recommended approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city Council of the city of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve a Special Permit to allow private structures on public land known as Devon Common for Stephanie Coon, owner of the abutting property, 4729 Island View Drive, subject tot he following conditions: 1. The permit shall expire five (5) years from the date of city Council approval. Permits must be renewed with change in dock license holders. 2. Ail conditions of approval must be completed within one (1) year of approval by City Council or the dock licensee will be withheld until completion. Proposed Resolution Coon Page 2 The stairway may be replaced. The new stairway shall be constructed according to code and approved by the Building Official. The retaining wall may be repaired and painted with a neutral color. Plantings/bushes must be installed at the base of the retaining wall to screen the wall, and also bushes on top of the wall shall be installed, as outlined in the Shoreland Management Ordinance. Prior to installation, a plan describing the type of plantings shall be submitted and approved by the Parks Director. Plantings should not block or hinder access along the commons. New electric outlet and lights may be installed, as shown on the plan. All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the State Electrical Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff. The flag pole and playhouse may remain, as is. PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MINUTES OF A MEETING MAY 9, 1996 PUBLIC LAND PERMITS - BATCH//8 The Parks Director, Jim Fackler, reviewed the staff report. Staff recommended approval of a 5 year permit for Batch #8, subject to the conditions as noted on the chart for Batch #8. All conditions of approval must be completed within one (1) year of approval by City Council or the dock licensee will be withheld until completion. Permits must be renewed with change in dock license holders. *All electrical work on public property is required by State law to be installed by a qualified licensed electrical contractor and inspected and approved by the State Electrical Inspector. The City Council must first approve of the proposed installation. A scaled site plan must be submitted showing in detail the location of all electrical services on the public land. All power supply to the abutting property must be properly disconnected until such work is approved by the City Council. The applicant must verify disconnection with staff. Park and Open Space Commission Minutes May 9, 1996 ABUTTING ADDRESS ENCROACHMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 4729 ISLAND VIEW DR STEPHANIE COON contacted - STAIRWAY - RETAINING WALL APPROVE REPLACEMENT OF STAIRWAY AND REPAIRS TO RETAINING WALL. NEW STAIRWAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO CODE AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. - PLANTINGS PLANTINGS, PER PLAN, SEE BELOW.** - ELECTRIC LIGHT & OUTLET APPROVE NEW ELECTRIC LIGHTS AND OUTLET AS SHOWN ON PLAN.* - PLAY HOUSE - FLAG POLE REMOVE OR RELOCATE FLAG POLE AND PLAY HOUSE ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. **#42314, Coon: As an alternative to the proposed planter box on top of the retaining wall, staff recommends the applicant install plantings/bushes at the base of retaining wall to screen the wall and also bushes on top of the wall, as outlined in the Shoreland Management Ordinance. Prior to installation, a plan describing the type of plantings shall be submitted and approved by the Parks Director. Plantings should not block or hinder access along the commons. The Parks Director noted that an application was submitted by the adjacent property owner. Applicant, Stephanie Coon stated that the playhouse is structurally sound, but it needs the trim painted so it will match the house. She was told when she purchased her house that the likelihood that playhouse would be allowed to remain would be good because it is structurally sound. She related the history of the playhouse and noted that the City laid the foundation and moved it to the commons. Darling asked if the playhouse would not be a public structure now that it is on public land? Byrnes emphasized that you have to cross private property in order to get to this commons, so their stair would not be used by the public. Goode added that this commons is not traversable, without a stairway. Fackler commented that staff has not specifed who is required to do the removal, and that they hope at this time to work out an agreement with the adjacent land owner; if they want to keep the structure and take responsibility for it or if they do not want to take responsibility for it and 6P,rexfe;,t.hatit berem°ved- Coon emphasized that the playhouse is not alarge structure, itis only Darling quoted a statement made by Curtis A. Pearson, City Attorney, in a letter to Ed Shukle dated November 10, 1995, "I would also caution that stairways which are located on public lands are in effect open to the public's use." Darling questioned if this also applies to other private structures. Pederson commented that the dock is considered private, and questioned how this is different than stairs. It was noted that the dock is located in the water, not on land. Darling also quoted from the same letter, "There is a potential for litigation and even a potential for a loss where the steps are on public land..." May 9, 1996 Park and Open Space Commission Minutes Goode commented that logically, when commons are nonaccessible or nontraversable, structures should not be considered public. Darling stated that they need to follow rules that are in place today. Casey emphasized that there are also scenic and passive uses for the commons, and some people prefer to view a natural shoreline, rather than a shoreline cluttered with structures. Byrnes confirmed that Fackler had stated earlier that if an owner assumes responsibility for a structure it may remain, and then when it gets to a dilapidated state or is destroyed by natural causes, that it would eventually be removed. Stephanie Coon agreed to assume responsibility of the playhouse. Michael Pride, Stephanie Coon's husband, reviewed the plans submitted with their application which include replacement of the stairway, lights installed on the stairs, repair of the cement retaining wall, painting the retaining wall, and planting ivy or some other type of vegetation in front of the wall. Casey asked if they would consider native plantings. Pride commented that they will work with staff and plant whatever is recommended. It was noted that this is a south facing hillside which gets a lot of sun. Pride stated that they prefer to keep the flag pole, and noted that it is bordered with railroad ties, about 3' x 4'. MOTION by Byrnes, seconded by Ahrens approve a five year permit, as recommended by staff with the exception that the playhouse and the flag pole may remain, and that the applicant talk to staff about plantings and the retaining wall. Casey commented that they are perpetuating old mistakes by allowing things to remain, and he agrees with Darling that they need to make policy decisions and determine if these structures should be considered either public or private, and decide what uses they should allow. Casey stated that he would oppose the motion, and that he is not in favor of the lights or allowing the flag pole to remain. Goode is in favor of allowing the playhouse to remain, however, feels the flag pole is a separate issue because this area will never look like public land. Ron McCombs stated that the rest of Lake Minnetonka is not pristine, and asked why Mound is trying to make the commons look pristine, and emphasized that flag poles are not harmful to environment. Casey stated that every City has rules and codes and as a Park Commission they need to recommend where the line should be drawn. The Shoreland Management Ordinance is one of these codes which both private and public land must comply with. Motion carried 4 to 3. Those in favor were: Ahrens, Goode, Byrnes, and Pederson. Opposed were: Casey, Geffre, and Darling. Park and Open Space Commission Minutes May 9, 1996 Ahrens stated that the Council has determined that if an applicant does not agree with staff's recommendation, that the Council will approve the permit anyway, pending the recommendations from the Commons Task Force. Ahrens noted that the Commons task force is still meeting on the issue of encroachments. Darling moved that the City look at all nontraversable or nonaccessible commons that are not private and look at selling or leasing these commons to the adjacent property owners. Geffre seconded motion. Byrnes stated that the City does not own commons, so they cannot sell it. In order to vacate any land it has to be proven to be in the public's best interest to do so. Ahrens suggested that adjacent property owners could lease the commons. Darling questioned if it is realistic for the City to manage the commons when their is no public use. Jim reminded Commission how this type of action may affect the dock program. It was discussed how the lineal footage of public land affects the number of docks in the program. Casey would like to keep control of the shoreline and attempt to regain the beautiful natural shoreline they once had. He commented that the Shoreland Management Ordinance was mandated because the shorelines have become overdeveloped and it should be a public policy to protect this land from degradation. Goode suggested they hold off on Darling's motion until the commons task force finishes their review and recommendation regarding encroachments. Darling clarified that the intent for his motion is not to arbitrarily sell land, but to start the process of researching the possibility, understand the legal ramifications, and see if it makes sense. Byrnes stated that the Commons Task Force has been directed by Council to address the issue of encroachments on the commons. Motion failed with 3 in favor, 3 opposed, and 1 abstention. Those voting in favor were Pederson, Darling, and Geffre, those opposed were Byrnes, Casey and Goode. Ahrens abstained. Ahrens explained that she will abstain anytime the Park Commission sends forward a recommendation to the Council regarding and issue such as this. PUBLIC LAND PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND, 5.341 MaYwood_Road~ Mound, MN Phone. 472-0500, Fax: 972-0620 55364 pISTRIBUTION% BUILDING OFFICIAL PARKS DIRECTOR DNR "MCWD PARK MEETING DATE ~'- CITY COUNCIL DATE I-- I I ,,I CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT - new construction. NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (City Code Section 320, Subd. 1). PUBLIC LAND MAINTENAI~CE PERMIT - to allow repairs to an existing structure (City code Section 320, Subd. 3). CONTIITOATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing improvement to remain in an "as is" condition (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). LA/qD ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, ! ~ fill etc. (City code Section 320, Subd. 4). , .;& ...................... ;; ........... ed lands g is like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the CitF to bring all these uses into conformance which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are granted for a limited time and are non-transferable, stairwa~ construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to change in dock site holder I Applicant Abutting Legal Description Public Property Contractor Name~ Address ~ '-- ~/'~ Phone (home) g/?~- TM ~--~ (work) Address ~ Z~ ~ ~" <~/ Owner ~'~'~-~'>~ ~~ Name Shoreline Type~ Dock site # Name~ Address VALUATION/PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (iNCLUDiNG LABOR&MATERIALS): /~~' ~ DESCRIBE REQUEST & pLSAPOSE: ~77~, "[ ~ '-' ' ' si~atu~e bf Appilcan~ / /: / i t // / / ./ t DRUMMOND ISLAND VILLAG[ OF ¥OU#D 0 0 T ROA::NOKE: ORr' REA 4729 ~'~- I.V.D. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 co I~ ~:) GOVT LOT MA~IOV~R RD e,* ';2L2 :30- 5 x : CITY OF MOUND MEMORANDUM 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 July 3, 1996 TO: FROM: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION Attached is a letter from the M~Suh~IFire Relief Association requesting an increase in the pension benefit currently received. The ~urre-~nt benefit is $425 per month. Each firefighter must have served 20 years or more before receiving the pension benefit. The benefit is part of the incentive to recruit firefighters and to keep them around for 20 ye~sbefore they retire. The hourly rate of pay that a firefighter now receives is $6.~50_.per hour which is P~]3;-i/~I'~ at a Iow rate so that the firefighters can have funds allocat&d to the pension program. In 1996, we increased that hourly rate to $6.50 per hour from $6.00 per hour. That rate had not been increased since 1984. Thus, the association has rightfully asked for an increase in their pension benefit. We have reviewed the request and have determined it to be in order. We do have some concerns, however, relating to the unfunded accrued liability. Section 69.773, Subdivision 4 of Minnesota Statutes, states that the contribution requirement is equal to the normal cost, expenses and amortization of the unfunded accrued liability by December 31, 2007. In other words, the contributions must continually be increased so that by 12/31/2007, the unfunded accrued liability must be zeroed out and the liability will be erased. We have discussed this concern with the President of the Association and he has conveyed our concern to the remainder of the Board of Directors. In addition, we have expressed concern regarding other pension issues and it is the intent of City staff and the Mound Fire Relief Association Board of Directors to continue to work on those issues to come up with a carefully planned strategy to deal with those issues into the future. t-~ased upon an actuarial that was performed as of 12/31/95, the current pension contributions~ .(~_rom the various cities in the fire district along with the investment earnings on the pension printed on recycled paper Memo to Mayor and City Council July 3, 1996 Page 2 monies that are invested by the association, are at an adequate level to cover a pension benefit increase of $35. The benefit would then be at $460 per month effective July 1, 1996. We have attached a Resolution for your approval regarding the increase in the pension benefit. If you have any questions, representatives of the Fire Relief Association Board of Directors will be present at Tuesday's meeting or you can contact Gino Businaro, Finance Director or myself. cc: Jeff Andersen, President, Mound Fire Relief Association Gino Businaro, Finance Director RESOLUTION #96-~?-/ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RELIEF ASSOCIATION'S REQUEST TO INCREASE PENSION BENEFITS AS REQUESTED WHEREAS, the Fire Department Relief Association has had its Actuarial Study done as of 12/31/95; and, WltEREAS, they are now requesting an increase in pension benefits from $425.00 per month to $460.00 per month, effective July 1, 1996; and, WHEREAS, there are adequate funds in this fund to allow these increases; and, WHEREAS, they have not had an increase in pension fund since 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the Fire Department Relief Association's request to an increase in pension benefits as follows: $460.00 per month, effective July 1, 1996. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mound Fire Relief Association Board of Directors and City Staff will continue to work on a carefully planned strategy to deal with the unfunded accrued liability issue and other pension related issues and to bring back a report in the near future to the City Council regarding that strategy. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: Acting City Clerk RECEIVED jiJ l I 1996 Mourn, d, F./~t,e. De.p-t. Re~P.~e~ Moum.d M~yo~ - Bob Mo~d City D~a.~ Ed , Gi.rto , Bob a.n.d :th.a. Mou. n.d Cit. g Co~ , A~ ~k~ ~d o~ 1994 ~k~ F~ D~p~. ~~ A~o~. C~ M~g~ w~ ~ ~o~d ~ ~o~ b~ b~ ~o~ bo~ O~ 1995 y~ z~d ~zpo~ ~o~zd ~ g~ o~ ov~ ~b~o~ 4o~ ~996 me p~o~d ~ ~~ ~ q~~ o~ 1996 A4~ ~zu~g ~z ~~ ~e ~ ~mz xzqx~ x~ ~~ o4 $35.00 p~ mo~ ~ o4 Z~Y 1996 ~ pe~io~ ~d wo~d p~ovZd~ ~ ~dd~o~ $55.00 mo~h WZTHOUT ~~g ~kz ~d~d ~b~Y OJe..t..a.h.e. 9.'ce.a.,t.. p,'c~..cLe. ,L~ .th.e.e. ue..'cydccy ope.,,ca.,t~or~ o~ .th.e. F.L.'ce. D~p.t.o. rscl by p.,couJ..dj..~9 good a..'ce, o..b~e. -f..o rno...Lr~cz~rc cored p,'cou.Cd¢ a..'cca, o~e. o.~ -t.h.¢ ~4..~e..sX; FJ.~e.. De.p.t~. lOo.. ~ool.c ~o,'~,oa..,ccl ~o b~r~9 p~ on. ~tk~ a. gcr~cie, o~ .tk~ ~oorce..~.t C ou..n.c..b6 me.o. AErcg .i.r~ o.~.clo..,c .to g,'~x~.n~ u~ -l' e~ .6.,.,e4/ 8. -Steve Smith State Representative District 34A Hennepin and Wright Counties Minnesota House of Representatives COMMITTEES: ETHICS, VICE CHAIR; COMMERCE, TOURISM AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS; REAL ESTATE AND COMMERCE SUBCOMMITTEE; JUDICIARY; JUDICIARY FINANCE DIVISION; CIVIL LAW SUBCOMMITTEE; LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION ON PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT April 30, 1996 Jeff Anderson 2221 Southview Lane Mound, MN 55364 Dear Jeff: It has been my distinct honor to serve as your State Representative. I have worked hard to keep in touch with you, believing as I do, that I was elected to do your will, not my own. You have a right to be kept informed of issues by your public.servants. Now that the 1996 legislative session is over, I want to let you know what happened with fire service issues. On a couple of issues: assault on a firefighter has been raised to a felony. House File 2136 was incorporated in the final omnibus crime/judiciary finance bill which has been signed into law by the Governor. It provides that whoever assaults a municipal or volunteer firefighter, such that the assault inflicts demonstrable bodily harm, is guilty of a felony and can be sentenced to imprisonment and/or a fine. On pensions/I was co-author of the 1996 Omnibus Public Pension bill, House File 2417, and I worked to improve the funding of firefighter pensions. When I was your mayor in Mound from 1986 through 1990 and as State Representative, I have been able to help put into practice my belief. And that is, that one of the ways to get and keep good volunteer firefighters, is to provide good pensions. One thing the citizens of our communities do not do often enough .is simply say "thank you" to the members of the fire department. But we know that when we dial 911, you will leave your family to come and protect ours. So for that, and on behalf of our communities and our state, I want to simply say "thank you" You have my support and you will continue to have it. Please read the enclosed letter from the Minnesota State Fire Chiefs' Association. S~t~ve Smith, State Representative 2710 Clare Lane, Mound, Minnesota 55364 State Office Building, 100 Constitution Ave, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1298 (612) 472-7664 (612) 296-918~ IR FAX (612) 296-8803 NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MINIJTES OF A M'V. ETING JUNE 13, 1996 NEW DOCK LOCATI NS - LONGFORD ROAD continued discussion Parks Director, Jim Fackler informed the Commission that he has reviewed this issue with Greg Nybeck of the LMCD regarding the acceptance of these docks under their code. Faclder reviewed the letter from the LMCD dated June 5, 1996 and explained that the LMCD allows for one boat for each 50 feet of shoreline, and these docks could be added to the City's 1997 renewal application for our multiple dock license. Ann Jepson, owner of one of the two existing docks in question, stated they would be happy to comply with any rules, but they do not want to become part of a shared common dock with the neighbors. They do not want their decision to delay the installation of their neighbors docks. They are happy about the neighborhood being improved, but requested their dock be dealt with separately. She explained their dock is the one on the far east. The Parks Director noted that a survey would determine if their dock is actually on Longford Road or on private shoreline. If it is found their dock is on Longford Road, it would become part of the commons dock program, and would remain a single dock assigned to their home. Pederson confirmed with the Jepson's they have no problem becoming part of the dock program. (Ahrens arrived) Ahrens questioned if they are allowed to go over the 448 docks as the City is licensed for through the LMCD. The Parks Director explained that they are allowed to have one restricted watercraft for each 50 feet of continuous shoreline. Since Mounds shoreline is not continuous, the code allows Boat Storage Units (BSU's) provided the total number of BSU's for the city multiple dock license does not exceed one restricted watercraft for every 50 feet of shoreline. Faclder noted that Mound has more than enough available BSU's based on lineal footage and there is enough lineal footage along Longford Road to handle the number of boats proposed. Fackler clarified that BSU's are the number of boats, and WSU's are based on boat length. For example, one larger boat may count as 1.5 or 2 WSU's. Ahrens stated that right now there are 448 dock sites and each dock is allowed 4 boats, and fight now that is their privilege. Fackler commented that it is not likely that each dock will have 4 boats, but it is more likely that the size of the boats could increase, and as boats grow, the units diminish Geffre questioned the size of the proposed multiple docks and questioned if dredging will be n~_..ded? Fackler stated that no dredging will be needed. Fackter noted that the two-slip dock will be about 39 feet wide. Fackler confn-med that staff's recommendation is to have this area designated as a Type C Shoreline. Geffre questioned if they are reviewing both proposed docks as one proposal. Faclder emphasized that it is less costly to process these docks on one application through the DNR, and the survey costs are also less. Fackler confunned there would be a total of nine new dock sites on the two multiple docks and up to three other individual dock sites. Akrens requested clarification regarding BSU's and WSU's. Fackler explained that the City's LMCD Multiple Dock License is based on WSU's, and he reviewed the numbers from ther 1995 application: BSU' s_ WSU's 305 boats up to 20' long @ 1 305 145 21' to 24' long @ 1.5 218 34 25' to 32' long @ 2 68 5 33' x 40' long @ 2.5 13, 604 489 Fackler cl,a~,ified that based on lineal footage of shoreSne as shown on the Dock Location Map, 1,220 WSU s are allowed. He will find out exactly how many lineal feet this dev~opment will. k~ !~2! when the survey is completed. Ahrens estimated this area could accommodate 9 boar up tx,~.o~20 feet long. ' Pederson asked if this area would be considered marsh land and nontraversible. Faclder agreed that it could be. Pederson referred to the Use Plan which describes Wildlife Areas as "marsh land and nontraversible," and questioned how this area differs from other Type E areas. The Parks Director stated that the Park Commission could recommend this area be designated as Type E, however, a request was received for docks, not for a Wildlife Area. Akrens commented that it is possible to traverse on foot down to the shoreline. that the steep portion of this property is actually located on private land. recommending stairs or paths as part of this request. Faclder noted Staff is not Ahrens questioned if both the existing docks are in question? Faclder stated that he will not know until the survey is complete. Ah.rens referred to the docks within the Lost Lake Subdivision which are all considered public docks, and the owners within that subdivision are not privy to those docks. Fackler commented that if these docks were to be open to the public, it would require a walkway easement in order to establish public access. Fackler noted that the abutting property owners will have priority to these docks. Meyer moved to recommend approval of the two multiple docks on Longford Road, one with 7 slips and one with 2 slips, subject to the condition that .~ intrusion to the marsh be minimized. Darling seconded the motion. Ahrens questioned how many dock applications were refunded this year because there were no sites available. The Dock Inspector noted that less than 20 were refunded, which is about average for the last three years. Darling commented that as much as we want to protect the lake, this is a community lake, and homes are being built, so we have to ask what is reasonable? Steve Behnke, representing the developer noted that one of the owners of the new houses does have a larger boat, but they are proposing standard size slips. He stated that they would be more comfortable if they were able to have a variation of sizes for the slips. Ahrens suggested they limit the area to a certain number of WSU's. Ahrens stated that she would vote against the motion as it reads because the motion does not address payment for the survey of Longford Road. She also feels that since this area is traversible, docks should be made available to the public. Pederson asked how many WSU's are alotted for this area? Faclder stated that even if there was not enough lineal footage in this area to accommodate the number of WSU's proposed, there is enough lineal footage left over from the entire dock system. He does believe this area would handle what is proposed. Geffre expressed a concerned about the size of the dock slips and noted that the two-slip docks are bigger. Fackler stated that the slip sizes of the new dock on Devon Common are basically 10' x 24'. It was noted that the large boat proposed to be docked at the two-slip dock is 30' long. Steve Behnke stated that they are akeady surveying their whole property as it is, and does not feel they should have to pay for the surveying of other peoples property. Fackler commented that they did utilize the survey for this property along with surveys of other neighboring properties in order to complete the entire survey of Longford which helped reduce the cost of the City's survey. Ahrens asked if this developer will be paying a park dedication fee? The secretary noted that they may not, it has not been determined yet. Ahrens again emphasized that the Lost Lake Subdivision had to give public easement and extra dockage for the public. Relating to paying for the survey, Ahrens noted that the developer is the main beneficiary of obtaining these docks. Geffre confirmed with the Parks Director that the City survey would not have been done unless this development came forth. Darling suggested a friendly amendment to the motion that the developer shall pay for the costs incurred by the city for surveying Longford Road. Steve Behnke commented that he would be in favor of paying for the survey costs if the survey totally related to their work, but the survey is also of other peoples docks. Meyer amended the motion to include the following conditions: 1. The developer shall recover the cost to the City for the survey of Longford Road ($605~00). When the seven slip dock is planned, the length and width of each sllp size shall be reviewed, and ff something other than a slip size of 10' x 24' is planned, it shall be brought back to the Park Commission for review. Motion carried 5 to 2. This request will be forwarded to the City Council on June 25, 1996. MINNETONKA.CONSERVAT. ON DisTRicT ~,~, ,[ ~~~ gO0 ~ST WAY~TA BOUL~ARD. SUI~ 180 · WA~TA. MINNESOTA ~39~ · TELEPHONE ~e 5 ~ ~996 Q, Nan WI!leos, EXECU;~vE DIRECTOR Dougla~ E. Chair, Toflka Bay Tom Reese Vice Cl~aJr, ~und ~seph Zw~ Robe~ ~p Treasurer ~horew~ Kern D~len Mlnne~n~ Ben Foster Deephaven Gremhe~ Mag~ch Mlnneton~ Wa~ta Craig Moiler Cmi~ S~ng Eugene M~nnmrl~m Paul 8~ ~cet~r Herb ~. Sue~h Mr. Jim Faekler City of Mound 5341 KaY~ood. Road Mound, MN S$364 Per convereation,'I have drafted a memo outlining' how dockage rights in' Mound are interpreted 'b~ L~CD Code. LMCD Code Secti°n 2.02, Subd. I "allows for'the storage of one restricted watercraft for each $0 feeC of continuous Ihoreline." In the calculation of shoreline for LMCD.oitiee with a.multiple'dook license,. LMCD Code allows these cities to accumulate total shoreline despite the ehoreiine may not be continuous. The Code also allOWs the cities to place Boat.Storage Units (BSU's) in a specific location"wi/ha density greater =has 1:50 provided the total number of BSUle for the. city multiple dock licinse'does not exceed, one' restricted WaterCraft for every 50.feet .of' shoreline. With regards to'.the docks.to beplaced'on'Lonqford' Road, this would be allowed provided that all aspects of LMCD Code are complied with. In 199'7' when your renewa~ appl£ca~ion for your =ultiple ' dock license ia submitted, an adJustment'.~n BSU~a will need to prc)arly nOte.the increase.on Longford Road. Feel frae to call me if you need further clarification on this ~atter. Sincerely, LAKE MINN'.TONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Administrative Technician CC: Tom. Rases- LMCD Board (Mot,md) CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 47243600 FAX (612) 472-0620 May 14, 1996 Mr. Greg Nybeck Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Wayzata Blvd. Suite 160 Wayzata, MN 55391 SUBJECT: LONGFORD ROAD DOCK SITES Dear Greg: Enclosed is the information we discussed during our phone conversation on Monday, May 13th. Please review this and respond to me by letter on how the LMCD rules apply. If you need any further background information, feel free to contact me at 472-0611. Parks Director Yl::pj Enclosures cc: Ed Shulfle, City Manager Tom Stokes, 4839 Cumberland Road, Mouad, MN 55364 Park and Open Space Cornmis~ion Minutes May 9, 1996 _NEW DOCK LOCATIONS - LONGFORD ROAD Parks Director, Jim Faclder, reviewed his memorandum. Currently, two homes are being built at 4622 and 4626 Kildare Road and another seven home sites are proposed for development on Kildare Road in the near future. Their location adjoins the unimproved Longford Road which is dry land above the Ordinary High Water elevation of 929.4. This land is under City con~ol and lies between these home sites and Lake Minnetonkz. There has been a request from the builder and future home owners to have dock locations established. Because of the marsh that is present where the docks would be located, the City must obtain a permit from the DNR. From my contact with the DNR this area seems to be in compliance with their regulations to establish dock sites. Their main concern is if the marsh is recognized as a protected fish spawning area, which it is not. The only other request of the DNR is that the docks limit their intrusion through the marsh. As you can see from the proposed plans, both sites have been consolidated to accomplish this. An application has to be submitted to the DN-R along with applicable fees and information. Grog Nybeck, LMCD, believes there will not be a problem adding this area to Mound's Multir~te Dock and Mooring Area License, we would just have to designate this on our 1997 application. If these sites are established, the Shoreline Type should be recognized as "Type 'C' on the Dock Location Map. The docks would be installed by the homeowners and have multiple slip sites. Each slip should be recognized as a single docking site with numbering as such. A base fee (currently $150.00) should be charged each year, per slip, and limited to one watercraft per slip, unless the Dock Inspector determines that the dock area may accommodate additional boats. Along with establishing this area, a survey of Longford Road must be done to recognize any other docks that are utilizing this area for access to the lake. This needs to be done so that the City is consistent in enforcing regulations of docks on properties under the control of the City. Ahrens questioned how they can increase the number of docks past 448 without going through the LMCD or without offsetting that number. Fackler stated that there is enough pubLic shoreland that was not included in the original linea/footage calculations to accommodate these additional dock sites. Ahrens questioned if they will need to take 9 dock sites away from somewhere else in order to add these 9. Ahrens feels they need to investigate this proposal further with the LMCD. Faclder emphasized that Grog Nybeck reviewed this issue with Gene Strommen, past Director of the LMCD and they did not think there would be a problem with the proposal. He also noted that the LMCD looks at boat count, not dock site count. Tom Stokes of Fine Line Development stated that these properties will be taxed as though they are lakeshore, so these properties should be eligible for a dock. He asked the Park Commission to approve the docks, subject to them meeting the requirements of other agencies. Doug Ripie, future owner of one of the houses currently under construction, stated that they designed the proposed dock to have least amount of impact on the lake. Goode asked if it wouldn't be better to relinquish Longford Road to the adjacent land owners? Do we need more commons.'? Pederson agreed, and emphasized that the property is not traversable, and there will never be a road there. Park and Open Space Cortm~sion Minutes May 9, 1996 °o Casey asked if the developer is paying the application f~s to the DNR? Fackter stated that the City would pay the application fee, however, this would be regained through the dock license fees. Fackler confirmed that he would expect the land survey to cost about $1,000, and this would be paid from the dock fund. MOTION by Darling to recommend approval of the multiple dock plan, as submitted, pending approval and compliance of any and all government agencies. Goode seconded the motion. Casey commented that the City is under no obligation to provide landowners with docks. He sees this area as a beautiful bluff, and asked if they should compromise their space to allow for docks in the marsh? He is concerned that they would be adding docks in a small channel that is pinched already. The two existing docks located on Longford Road were discussed. Casey questioned how Crescent Park was designated as a wildlife area? Darling withdraw his motion because he thou~t the two existing docks were going to be replaced with this one new multiple dock. Pete Buckner, future owner of one of the houses currently under construction, stated that instead of two new docks, they are proposing one joint dock, and asked why this is an issue? Geffre asked Fackler if the other two docks are actually on Longford Road. Fackler beleived they could be, but it was not cost effective at the time to survey the property, but now because of new surveys provided to the City from a developer, he realized that it is all public shoreline so now they should add it to the dock program. It is kis intent to bring the whole area into compliance. Goode asked if it would not be better to have one multiple dock for all. Fac!der noted that access to the dock would be an issue. Byrnes was excused from the meeting. Tom Stokes emphasized that these people own the land on the other side of Longford Road, even though it is underwater, and this property will be part of a Homeowners Association. Fackler asked where do you draw the line? Ahrens asked how many other people own private land on the other side of their commons? Casey moved to deny the two new docks sites as proposed. The Commission asked what action will be taken with the two existing docks? Should they be brought into the program? Ahrens asked what will justify the expense of the survey if the new docks are denied? Faclder stated that he received substantial evidence that public land existed, should he ignore it? Park and Open Space Commission Minutes May 9, 1996 Goode noted that some portions of the shoreline did abut private property and asked if the LMCD would suppor~ the placement of a private dock at these points. FacPder commented that the LMCD may have a concern regarding setbacks. He stated that the LMCD requires 50 feet of shoreline per boat, but offered to check with them on the issue. Ahrens stated she is not opposed to property that abuts the shoreline to have docks, but is opposed to having docks added to the program that do not have approval from the LMCD and she does not believe Greg Nybeck gave approval. She does not believe that the lineal footage was never computed in original permit. Fackder stated that the lineal footage has been increased over the years, the City has gained Lost Lake and the area off of Denbigh. Ahrens would like to confirm that the LMCD would allow this. She is concerned that if they surpass the number of 4~8 dock sites, what would prevent them from adding 20 sites to the new multiple dock by Pembroke Park or other areas? She does not want to set a precedent. Motion failed 5 to 1. Those in favor of denial were Goode, Geffre, Darling, Ahrens, and Pederson. Casey was opposed. MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Darling, to table this request until further information is received from the LMCD. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission clarified the information they want from the LMCD: saturation point? maximum number of docks? can docks be ins~led on shoreline which is less than 50 feet wide? Regarding the two existing docks, Faclder commented that this area is not recognized on the Dock Location Map as a docking area, at this time. He would like to see this entire area addressed. Casey moved to extend meeting 15 minutes past 10:00. Motion seconded by Goode. Motion carried unanimously. - ~g75 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (6121 472-0600 FAX (612} 472-0620 Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: May 1, 1996 Park and Open Space Commission ~ lim Fackler, Parks Director _~.~.- New Dock Site Locations - Long. ford Road Currently, two homes are being built at 4622 and 4626 Kildare Road and another seven home sites are proposed for development on Kildare Road in the near future. Their location adjoins the unimproved Longford Road which is dry land above the Ordinary High Water elevation of 929.4. This land is under City control and lies between these home sites and Lake Minnetonka. There has been a request from the builder and future home owners to have dock locations established. Because of the marsh that is present where the docks would be located, the City must obtain a permit from the DNR. From my contact with the DN'R this area seems to be in compliance with their regulations to establish dock sites. Their main concern is if the marsh is recognized as a protected fish spawning area, which it is not. The only other request of the DNR is that the docks limit their inU-usion through the marsh. As you can see from the proposed plans, both sites have been consolidated to accomplish this. An application has to be submitted to the DNR along with applicable fees and information. This application will take approximately six weeks to be processed by the DNR. I will include all the proposed dock sites on one application to the DNR. The fee that is required by the DNR would be less with one application. I have also been in contact with Greg Nybeck, LMCD, regarding the addition of this area to Mound's Multiple Dock and Mooring Area License. He believes there will not be a problem adding this area and that we would just have to designate it on our 1997 application. There will be no additional charge by the LMCD for Mound's Multiple Dock License until there are boats stored at the subject docks. Memorandum Lo~gford Road May 1, 1996 Page Two Generally we do not see additions or changes to the Dock Location Map at this time of year, however, it is not restricted, as you will note on the attached copy of City Code Section 437:10, SuM. 2, "Annual Review of Map. The map needs to be reviewed at least once a year." If these sites are established, the Shoreline Type should be recognized as "Type 'C': Shoreline with no traversable space; stairs needed to shoreline, not accessible by public right-of-way (abutting property owners only." The docks will be installed by the homeowners and have multiple slip sites. Each slip should be recognized as a single docking site with numbering as such. A base fee (currently $150.00) should be charged each year, per slip, and limited to one watercraft per slip, unless the Dock Inspector determines that the dock area may accommodate additional boats. Along with establishing this area, a survey of Longford Road must be done to recognize any other docks that are utilizing this area for access to the lake. This needs to be done so that the City is consistent in enforcing regulations of docks on properties under the control of the City. I have discussed this with the City Engineer and the survey cost is to be determined, but he will take into account that most of this area has already been surveyed by the developer of K/Ida.re Road property. Enclosures CC.' Ed Shulde, City Manager Tom McCaffrey, Dock Inspector Tom Stokes (Owner/Developer) Subd. 2. Annual Review of Map.. Approved dock location maps shall 0e t~ept aha maintained by the Dock Inspector and shall be reviewed by the Park and Open Space Commission at least once a year. The Park Advisory Commission shall review the dock location map between September 1 and December 31 before each new boating season so their recommended changes may be referred to and considered by the City Council on or before January 15. Maps shall contain all approved dock locations as established by the Council upon the advice and recommendation of the Dock Inspector and Park Advisory Commission. Final approval of the dock location map and the number of private dock licenses to be permitted shall be recommended by the Dock Inspector, reviewed by the Park Commission and approved by the City Council. (ORD. 45-1990 - 12-29-90) LONGFORD ROAD 19-~17-23 21 TOM STOKES 4839 CUMBERLAND ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 DOUG & ANN JEPSON 2545 BLACK LAKE LANE MOUND, MN 55364 (BRENSHELL, 4626 KILDARE) ~~o BLVD. 55364 (4622 KILDARE) BOB & MEREDITH SMITH 4630 KILDARE ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 NORMAN BERGLUND 1905 CONCORDIA ST. WAYZATA, MN 55391 'EROME & KATHLEEN TREVIS 4644 CARLOW ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 DOUG RIPPIE 4622 KILDARE ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 PETE BUCHNER 4626 KILDARE ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 THESE PEOPLE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION REGARDING DOCK DISCUSSION FOR 6/13 PARK COMMISSION MEETING. - ' ~)577 ! I II % VH.L&~ OF $1~RIN~ PARK Carlson Park t J~von Park '-0UNTY 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 :l '-'°' ~" ', II I 30280 ~:l Il F--1F ........ ' KI/DARE ROAD ROAD Ii ROAD h 5 SUFFO~.K I RICHMOND DORCH[~TER I MANCHESTER ROAD I ROAD IMBERLAND ROAD ROAD ROAD ROAD O~ \ \¥ ! / ! ! KERRY LANE ,) ~GAL D~SCRIPTIoN; Lots 6 ~hru 8, inclusive, ~]ock I, Lo! 3 thru $, inclusive, and Lot 8, all :~ Block 2, dnd LOts 11 thru 36, znclust~ alock 11, all in SETUN, according to I recorded plat thereof Hennepin Count~ Minnesota. ' CATE 01' SURV ' PREPAR_ED__F_'_OR4~;;)/' -- EY -- ~ : 5 ~ TSO *. . .~__~ , ;-, ? . - ~ . . !~ .','.'- LOTS TO ;BE DEVELOPED: 3.4-20 & 27-33, B.LOCK 3.3., INC.L 'LOTS 3-6, B'LOCK 2 EXISTING HOME ON LOTS 13 & 34, 4630 KILDARE, BOB & MEREDITH SMITH NEW HOUSE ON LOTS 12 & 35, 4626 KILDARE ROAD, PETE BUCHNER NEW HOUSE ON LOTS 11 & 36, 4622 KILDARE ROAD, DOUG RIPPLE SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION QUASI PUBliC FUNCTION - PORTABLE SIGI~I City of MoUnd, 5341 MayW°od Road, **Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-0600 FAX: 472-0620 Portable signs used for the purpose of directing the public used in conjunction with a governmental unit or quasi-public functions. The period of use shall not exceed ten (1B~ consecutive days and requires approval of the City Council. Signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event, and/or on such other premises as approved by the City Council when granting the permit. A permit is required, however is exempt from all fees. (If more than one, please list on separate sheet of paper) - - NUMBER OF SIGNS: TYPE OF SIGN: SIZE OF SIGN: DATES OF USE: banner wall mount temporary . permanent feet high x / ~ feet wide = ~o~o ? ~,,~ ~ ¢<~ ~o~ 7 ~,/~ ¢~ free standing 9 /square feet DESCRIBE SIGN (message, materials, is it illuminated, et_c. ): >licant' IIIIIIIIIII/111 ~2- Or"- Date ~/11111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON: CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 July 2, 1996 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MOUND CITY COUNCIL LINDA STRONG, ACTING CITY CLERK ~.'~' TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY The property known as Lot 4, Block 9, Mound Terrace, PID//14-117-24 32 0046, is a tax forfeit parcel. Hennepin County intends to place this parcel up for public sale in August of 1996. The City had requested it to be held previously, but did not list a reason. Now it must be either held with a legitimate reason or the City can request the County to release it for sale. The property is zoned R-l, is 26,481 square feet (.61 acres). There are no assessments owing at this time. The property went exempt in 1995. Prior to 1995 the 1993 market value was $15,000. Recommendations from the City Engineer, Planning Commission and Parks and Open Space Commission are attached, along with a resolution to retain a 10 foot easement, and to release the property for public sale. ls printed on recycled paper Run: 2-Ju[-96 14:13 OFF01 Prfmary IS~ls on(y: No Date Reported range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Dispositions: All Activity codes: AIl Officers/Badges: A[~ Grids: Att MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page 1 ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- CODE DESCRIPTION PERCENT REPORTEO FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED A2235 A5331 A5351 A5352 A5354 A5355 ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-KNIFE ETC-CHILD-ACQ 1 ASLT 5-1NFLT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM 1 ASLT S-MS-INFLICT ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM ? ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC 1 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM 3 ASLT 5-MS-INFL]CT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ 2 2 A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ A5503 ASS05 33794 ~3894 34090 ~4990 :3941 2500 2EO0 3500 3900 ~EO0 $004 7041 ~001 ;005 ASLT 5-MS-FEAR BOO HRM-NO WEAP-ADLT-STR 1 ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-NO WEAP-CHLD-ACQ 1 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COH THEFT 1 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COH THEFT 2 BURG 4-AT FRC NRES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1 FORGERY-MS-OTH ACT-MONEY-PERSON 1 TRAFFIC-GM-DUI LIQUOR-UNK INJURY-UNK VEH 4 TRAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH 4 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 5 TRAFFIC-MS-OTHER 1 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH 3 DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS-UNK WEAP-CHLD-FAM 1 CSC 4-UNK ACT-OTH FAM-UNK AGE-F 1 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 1 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 ? 0 3 0 4 ? 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3 0 2 1 0 3 100.0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 100.0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 O, ' 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 100.0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 O. 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 100.0 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 Run: 2-Ju~-96 10:39 CFS08 Primary ISN's only: No Date Reported range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 Tim ge each day: 00:00 - 23:59 dow Received: Att Activity Resutted: Att Oispositions: Att Officers/Badges: Att Grids: Att Patrot Areas: ALt Days of the week: Att ACTIVITY COOE DESCRIPTION MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Catts For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS Page TB159 THEFT-MORE 2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP TC169 THEFT-501-2500-FE-~ATERCRAFT-OTH PROP TF059 THEFT-201-5OO-GM-YARDS"OTN PROP TF169 TNEFT-201-5OO-GM-~ATERCRAFT-OTH PROP TG029 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-OTH PROP TG059 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-YARDS-OTHR PROP TG15~ THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER TG169 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-~ATERCRAFT-OTH PROP U1013 U1497 U3288 U3289 U3498 U3499 VB021 ~3190 X3080 X3250 X3360 THEFT-FE-BY CHECK-$501-$2500 THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-201-500 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-200 OR LESS THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-35000-OR MORE TNEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO-MOTOR-35000'OR'MORE VEN-501-2500-FE-TNEFT-AUTO WEAPONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-HO CHAR CRIM AGNST ADHN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-VIOL ORD PROTECTION CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-MS-VIOL HARRASS REST ORDER 1 1 2 1 2 4 4 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 **** ~eport TotaLs: 410 2-Ju[-96 10:39 CFS08 Prfmary ISN~s on[y: No Date Reported range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: Ali Activity Resulted: AIl Dispositions: AIl Officers/Badges: AIl Grids: All Patrol Areas: AIl Days of the week: AIl ACTIVITY COOE DESCRIPTION MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Ca[Is For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DUI LIQUOR-UNK INJURY-UNK VEH 4 J2EO0 TRAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEB 4 J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 5 J3900 TRAFFIC-MS-OTHER 1 J3EO0 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH 3 (6004 DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL R]GHTS-UNK WEAP-CHLD-FAM 1 .7041 CSC 4-UNK ACT-OTN FAM-UNK AGE-F 1 43001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 1 13005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO 1 14199 LIQUOR - OTHER 1 5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW 4 5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 10 6501 DRUG PARAPHERNAL]A-POSSESS]ON 1 1310 DISTURBING PEACE-FE-STALK]NG-UNKNOWN 1 3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3 ~070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE 2 ;190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 3 !110 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 1 120 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT 2 110 PROP DANAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 11 600 L]TTER-UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS 1 226 STLN PROP'FE'POSSESS-VEHICLES-2500-~4~ 2 Page Run: 2-JUL-96 10:39 CFS08 Primary ISN's onty: No Date Reported range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 Tim le each day: 00:00 - 23:59 ,iow Received: ALL Activity ResuLted: AIl Dispositions: AL[ Officers/Badges: Att Grids: ALL Patrol Areas: ALL Days of the week: ALt ACTIVITY CODE DESCRIPTION MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Carts For Service INCIOENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS Page 9<230 HANDGUN APPLICATION 9950 INFO/INT 9980 WARRANTS 9990 MISC. VIOLATIONS 9992 MUTUAL AID/8100 9993 MUTUAL AID/6500 999/ "UTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER 9996 MUTUAL AID/NARCOTICS A2235 A5331 A5351 A5352 A5354 A5355 A5502 A5503 A5505 B3794 83894 B40 B4990 C3941 ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-KNIFE ETC-CHILD-ACO ASLT 5-1NFLT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BO HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BO HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD'ACQ ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ ASLT 5-MS-FEAR BOO HRM-NO WEAP-ADLT-STR ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-NO WEAP-CHLO-ACQ BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK HEAP-CON THEFT JRG 4-AT FRC NRES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT FORGERY-MS-OTH ACT-MONEY-PERSON 3 13 5 4 5 5 1 1 1 7 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 Run: 2-Ju(-96 10:39 CFS08 Prfmary ISN's only: No )ate Reported range: 05/26196 - 06/25/96 Time range eech day: 00:00 - 2~:59 How Received: ALL Activity Resulted: AJJ Dispositions: ALL Officers/Badges: A([ Grids: AL[ Patrol Areas: AIL Days of the week: ALt ~CTIVITY COOE DESCRIPTION 9313 FOUND PROPERTY 9314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED 9315 UNCLAIME DESTROYED ANIMALS 9430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS 9450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS 9561 DOG BITE 9563 DOG AT LARGE 9564 DOG BARKING 9566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 9710 MEDICAL/ASU 9720 MEDICAL/DOA 9730 MEDICALS 9731 MEDICAL$/DX 9750 FIRES 7800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT PUBLIC ASSIST LOITERING/LURKING ALL HCCP CASES OPEN DOOR/ALARMS MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Ca[[s For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 6 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 6 5 Page Run: 2-JUL-96 10:39 CFS08 Primary %SN's only: No Date Reported range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 TiM le each day: 00:00 - 23:59 now Received: AL[ Activity ResuLted: ALL Dispositions: ALL Officers/Badges: ALL Grids: ALL Patrol Areas: AL[ Days of the week: MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors CaLLs For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS 9000 SPEEDING 44 9001 J-SPEEDING 5 9002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 1 9004 RESTRICTED D/L 1 9012 OPEN BOTTLE 2 9014 STOP SIGN 13 901~ '~ILURE TO YIELD 2 9018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 5 9022 EXHIBITION DRIVING 3 9034 STOP ARM VIOLATION 1 9036 OBSTRUCTED VISION 1 9039 J-ALL OTHER TRAFFIC 1 9040 NO SEATBELT 5 9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 24 9150 NO TRAILER PARKING 6 9200 DAS/DAR/DAC 4 9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIREO 29 9211 J-PLATES/NO-EXPIRED-IMPROPER 1 9220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF 4 92 IANGE OF DOMICILE 3 9309 FOUND/RUNAWAY 1 9312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 7 Page Run: 2-3u~-96 8:39 PRO03 Priory ISN's only: No Date Reportecl range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 Activity codes: ALL Property Status: ALL Property Types: Property Descs: AL( Brands: Models: ALt Officers/Badges: ALL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Property Report STOLEN/RECOVERED BY DATE REPORTED Page Prop Prop Znc no ISM Pr Prop Date Rptd StoLen Date Recov'd Quantity Act Brand Mode[ Off-1 Off-2 Tp Desc SN Stat StoLen VaLue Recov'd VaLue Code Assnd Assnd Prop type TotaLs: 1,000 1,000 1.000 Prop type TotaLs: 740 80 4.000 Prop type Totals: 29 4 3.000 Prop type TotaLs: 900 0 5.000 Prop type TotaLs: 3,955 120 14.000 Prop type Totals: 3,271 1,150 8.000 Prop type Totals: 245 0 2.000 Prop type Totals: 165 0 1.000 Prop type Totals: 643 138 12.000 Report Totals: 10,948 2,492 50.000 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT JUNE 1996 Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Window Tint Miscellaneous TOTAL WARRANT ARRESTS Felony Misdemeanor ~dult 25 26 16 1 0 8 1 0 0 9 86 1 11 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT JUNE 1996 DWI More Than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired or No Plates Stop Arm Violations Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Code Enforcement Seat Belt MV/ATV Miscellaneous Tags TOTAL 9 7 0 4 2 44 1 1 29 1 13 2 5 0 4 0 0 30 0 1 5 5 0 7 170 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _1 7 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT JUNE 1996 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS YEAR TO LAST YEAR MONTH DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 83 Non-Hazardous Citations 48 Hazardous Warnings 29 Non-Hazardous Warnings 37 Verbal Warnings 95 Parking Citations 30 DWI 9 Over .10 7 Property Damage Accidents 3 Personal Injury Accidents 3 Fatal Accidents 0 Adult Felony Arrests 3 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 49 Juvenile Felony Arrests 3 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 21 Part I Offenses 34 Part II Offenses 92 Medicals 39 Animal Complaints 46 Ordinance Violations 16 Other Public Contacts 1,114 382 277 129 304 432 382 26 20 34 11 0 23 168 34 93 151 375 205 205 102 4,426 446 415 109 297 321 217 20 15 47 16 0 8 158 33 76 143 348 175 346 258 3,506 TOTAL 1,761 7,779 6,954 Assists 112 468 443 Follow-Ups 34 203 203 HCCP 2 31 17 Mutual Aid Given 11 89 83 Mural Aid Requested 3 64 80 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT JUNE 1996 OFFENSES CLEARED EXCEPT- CLEARED BY ARRESTED REPORTED UNFOUNDED CLEARED ARREST ADULT JUV PART I CRIMES Homicide Criminal Sexual Conduct Robbery Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Vehicle Theft Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PART II CRIMES Child Abuse/Neglect 3 Forgery/NSF Checks 2 Criminal Damage to Property 14 Weapons 1 Narcotic Laws 1 Liquor Laws 2 DWI 9 Simple Assault 7 Domestic Assault 8 Domestic (No Assault) 5 Harassment 3 Juvenile Status Offenses 15 Public Peace 6 Trespassing 0 All Other Offenses 16 34 0 3 3 2 3 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 9 9 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 16 0 3 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 13 0 TOTAL 92 0 13 46 38 20 PART II & PART IV Property Damage Accidents 3 Personal Injury Accidents 3 Fatal Accidents 0 Medicals 39 Animal Complaints 46 Mutual Aid 15 Other General Investigations 1,114 TOTAL 1,220 HCCP 2 Inspections 16 TOTAL 1,364 16 49 40 23 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1996 INVESTIGATIONS The investigators worked on 1 criminal sexual conduct case and 5 child protection issues, accounting for 34 hours of investigation time. Other cases included robbery, assault, burglary, arson, possession of stolen property, illegal dumping of hazardous waste, theft, stolen auto, damage to property, domestic abuse, theft by check, harassment, and absenting. Formal complaints were issued for overweight load, theft of service, open bottle, impersonating an officer, minor consumption, disorderly conduct, assault, damage to property, DWI, violation of court order, and driving after revocation. III. personnel/Staffing The department used approximately 86 hours of overtime during the month of June. Officers used 102 hours of comp-time, 90 hours of vacation, 55 hours of sick time, and 10 holidays. Officers earned 113 hours of comp- time. Michelle Alexander was hired as a police officer to fill an open position. James Packard and Patrick Clark were hired to fill the open Community Service Officer positions. Officer Huggett attended the regional canine competition with "Rainbo" in June and earned his PD 1 certificate. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS Officers Packard and Clark addressed 13 animal complaints, 17 ordinance violations, and 42 miscellaneous calls for services. 1 citation was issued in June. The reserves donated 172 hours during the month of June. LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-0621 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Chief Len Harrell Monthly Report for June 1996 STATISTICS The police department responded to 1,364 calls for service during the month of June. There were 34 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 criminal sexual conduct, 5 burglaries, 1 aggravated assault, 26 larcenies and 1 vehicle theft. There were 92 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses included 3 child abuse/neglect, 2 forgery/NSF checks, 1 weapon, 1 narcotic, 14 damage to property, 2 liquor law violations, 9 DUI's, 7 simple assaults, 13 domestics (8 with an assaults), 3 harassment's, 15 juvenile status offenses, and 22 other offenses. The patrol division issued 140 adult citations and 7 .juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 30 tickets. Warnings were issued to 90 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 2 adults and 3 juveniles arrested for felonies. adults and 20 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. additional 13 warrant arrests. There were 38 There were an The department assisted in 6 vehicle accidents, 3 with injuries. There were 39 medical emergencies and 46 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 11 occasions in June and requested assistance 3 times. Property valued at $10,948 was stolen. I ;' f ~zzzzz~z~z~ l U :, ( / ,iff, I I I~ I I I 0,, ..t ,-I Il- ,0 ',0 ,,,~ u'~ Z c:~ u'~ O, I I J 0 ¢ BILLS July 09, 1996 BATCH 6063 $ 89,839.77 BATCH 6064 Total Bills 89,536.36 $179,376.13 CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC I-IE~G NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 65364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-062O CASE NO. 96-37 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A 30 FOOT WIDE PLATTED RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS COBDEN LANE LOCATED NORTH OF WINDSOR ROAD AND TERMINATED AT LOT 3, BLOCK I OF TEAL POINTE LOCATED IN "ARDEN" ADDITION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 13, 1996, to consider the vacation of that portion of Cobden Lane located north of Windsor Road and terminating at Block 1, Lot 3 of Teal Pointe. This portion of Cobden Lane is platted to be 30 feet wide, and is unimproved. 4 All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting 1/eggffJ~s, ~I/anning Secretary ed m affected property owners by August 2, 1996. Published ia 'The Laker" on July 27, 1996 and Posted by July 29. 1996. [ printed on recycled paper Peter C. Meyer 5748 Sunset Road Mound, Mn 55364 7-1-96 To: Mound Council From: Peter Meyer Re: Birch Lane Tax Forfeit Property FYI: June 22 Star Tribune Insite Article "Public Land" I thought you might find this article about public land interesting and timely. The three main points that impressed mc were: 1. Voters in thc metro area arc passing land referendums to purchase green space. 2. Mound has very few acres of' green space. After totalling Mound's grccn space acres as listed in thc Recreation Section of Mound's Comprehensive Plan (4/90), and subtracting Lost Lake's 40 acres and thc School District's 45 acres, I found that Mound is at the bottom end of the Metropolitan Council's recommendation of park land per 1,000 residents ratio for cities. 3. Mound ranks very low compared to thc area communities listed in thc Parks and People chart in the article. During Mound's early histo~, green space is what attracted tourists and settlers here. We need to concentrate on our strengths, which include our lakes, parks, and nature areas. There is a need for Mound to acquire more parkland. The Birch Lane property can be added to our parklands at no cost to the city or it's citizens. It's a win-win situation. Please vote to retain this parcel for parklands. SATURDAY, JUNE 22 · 1996 Metro/State INSIGHT: Public land In Eagan, as in other suburbs, residents Want green space The fast-growing city Will vote this fall on whether to spend $5.8 million to buy about 100 ~.ore acres of parkland and to improve e:dsting By Dennis Cassano Star Tribune StaffWriter iWhen a developer proposed bu!!ding some townhouses on a 3-acre strip of land between an apartment complex and another group of townhouses in Eagan, Ion lezusko and his neighbors rebelled. Armed with petitions signed by some 200 people urging that the land near the intersection of Yankee Doodle Rd. and Federal Dr. be preserved as open space, they convinced the City Council this. spring not only to stop the developer, but to take ownership of,~he tax-forfeited property so it can'never be developed. iA similar public outcry helped kiQ'a proposal to build a housing de.'elopment around the Carriage Hills Golf Course in Eagan. ,Ken Vraa, the city's parks di- rector, said some opponents sim- plY'didn't want any more houses or'~residents in the neighborhood, while others wanted to continue to enjoy the open space around the course. A third group did not object to the development pro- posal but wanted the trees to be saved. Vraa and Mayor Tom Egan said that people in the fast-grow- ing Dakota County suburb are starting to feel a need for more breathing room. This fall resi- dents will be asked whether they are willing to spend $3.8 million to buy land for more parks and $800,000 to improve existing parks. No date has been set for the bond referendum. Several other cities have asked their residents similar questions recently. Each time, the answer has been, "Yes": ;~ Voters in Plymouth author- ized spending $2.2 million for new parks last year. } Maple Grove voters ap- proved $5 million in bonds in a 1993 referendum, as did Maple- wood voters in 1995. >- Eden Prairie voters in 1994 authorized spending almost $2 million to buy several parcels of native prairie and woodland to- taling 96 acres. Potential park sites Eagan has bought some par- cels over the years with money that developers are required to contribute for parks. However, Parks and people The Metropolitan Council encourages cities to provide a minimum of seven to 14 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. A random survey of area communities shows that most meet or exceed that standard. Population Acres per City est. April 1994 Acres 1,000 people Maple Grove 43,542 1,120 25 Plymouth 57,391 980 17 Maplewood 32,903 565 17 Woodbury 28,627 777 27 Eden Prairie 44,189 · 1,600 36 Eagan 54,957 1;200 21 St. Louis Park 43,641 820 19 West St. Paul 19,332 115 6 Chanhassen 14,316 450 31 Cottage Grove 26,675 540 20 Coon Rapids 58,991 950 16 Minneapolis 366,480 6,400 17 St. Paul 271,660 4,001 15 Source: City Parks Departments, U.S. Census Egan said, the amount of money raised from developers has not kept pace with the suburb's park and recreation needs. City officials and a citizen task force have pared a list of about 50 potential park sites to 23 loca- tions, including about 500 acres. The $3.8 million bond issue would be enough to buy about 100 acres, Vraa said. If the bond issue is approved, the Eagan City Council likely would seek additional money lat- er to develop athletic fields and install playground equipment on some of the new parkland. £gan said a recent survey of residents' park preferences re- vealed "a real change in taste." He said people want soccer fields, for instance, "although baseball is still popular. But we need fewer tennis courts." He said those feelings will be taken into consideratic aen the city decides which pad<s to develop and which to leave in a natural state. Parks are developed not only by cities, but by counties, the state, the Metropolitan Council and the federal government as well. In addition to its own 1,200 acres of parkland, Eagan is home to the the Met Council's Lake Byllesby Regional Park, a 420- acre facility that will soon gain another 200 acres. While there is no official gov- ernment standar: for the amount of parkland a corlmunity should have, the National Recreation and Parks Association, a private, nonprofit professional organiza- tion, has set a standard of 7 to 14 acres of parks per 1,000 people in cities. The Met Council has en- couraged cities to follow that standard. PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MINIYrEs OF A MEETING JUNE 13, 1996 TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY, 6273 BIRCH LANE, LOT 4, BLOCK 9, MOUND TERRACE, 14-117-24 32 0046. The Parks Director noted that this is a very nice lot, it is high ground and has a number of trees. The whole lot is on a hill. Ahrens suggested the lot be released for sale and the revenue, if any, be put in the park dedication fund. Meyer suggested that this is a piece of property that they could add to Mound's open space and see it saved. MOTION made by Ahrens to recommend the lot be released for sale, and the revenues, if any, be deposited in the park dedication fund. Due to lack of a second, the motion failed. MOTION made by Darling, seconded by Meyer, to recommend that the parcel be brought into the park system. It was noted that there is no cost for the City to retain the parcel. Faclder noted that the only future cost would be there was a hazardous tree situation on the property. Darling commented that this parcel is huge compared to other small strips of land which the city has control. This is a very large piece of open land which should develop naturally. Pederson commented that they need to plan for the future, there are only so many trees and open land, and she would like to see it retained. Ahrens commented that the day is coming when we will not be able to care for the land we have. Geffre stated there is no reason why we need to sell it now, it could always be sold in the future, so we should keep it for now. Ahrens suggested they get prepared to put up another "no dumping" sign. Meyer commented that beside the environmental reasons to retain this lot, it is one of the last woods where neighborhood kids play. Botko conf'u'rned that it would be easy to release the property for sale again. Motion carried 5 to 1. Those in favor were: Darling, Meyer, Geffre, Peterson, and Botko. Ahrens was opposed. MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1996 TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY: 6273 BIRCH LANE, LOT 4, BLOCK 9, MOUND TERRACE, pID 14-117-24 32 0046 As recommended by the City Engineer, the Building Official recommended the Planning Commission recommend the parcel be released for sale. Hanus asked if this property could be used for stormwater management? Sutherland noted that it is not the most desirable property for this use. MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Weiland to recommend this parcel be released for sale. Motion carried unanimously. REC'D JUN McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-4739 Telephone 612/476-6010 612/476-8532 FAX Engineers Planners Surveyors MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Linda Strong, Acting City Clerk John Cameron, City Engineer June 20, 1996 City of Mound Tax Forfeit Property Lot 4, Block 9, Mound Terrace PID 14-117-24 32 0046 FILE NO.: MFRA #6670 As requested, I have reviewed the above mentioned tax forfeit lot and would recommend that the City release it for sale. The lot is over 1/2 acre in size, fronts an improved City street and is served with both City sewer and water. The City's record plans show a sewer service extended to the property line; but we could not find any indication that a water service is in-place. The watermain appears to be very close to the edge of the road, thus it would be fairly easy to install a new water service. If this parcel is released for sale, I would recommend that the City keep a drainage and utility easement over the northeasterly 10 feet. This easement is required because of the narrow 30 foot fight-of-way and the fact that the watermain is within a few feet of the edge of the road and fight-of-way. e:~nain:~nisc\6670-530 An Equal Opportunity Employer 2O0 18~'. 4 15g. I 2.00.08 ' '.-'- 137 120 231.7 170.4 163. 2 >'19'5.9 ~ o,, 2oo ~ ~ 89, 5 : SOUTHVIEW ' 200 I00 8,9.5 .,.:' ~-'54.5 205. 4 "2~6.2 310.3 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO REQUEST THE STATE TO RELEASE THE NORTHEASTERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 4, BLOCK 9, MOUND TERRACE FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AND DIRECT THIS PARCEL OF LAND TO BE RELEASED FOR SALE. WHEREAS, Lot 4, Block 9, Mound Terrace, PID #14-117-24 32 0046, is a tax forfeit property, and; WHEREAS, it is recommended by the City Engineer that the City retain the Northeasterly 10 feet for drainage and utility easement and release the property for sale, and; WHEREAS, the easement is required because of the narrow 30 foot right-of-way and the fact that the watermain is wihin a few feet of the edge of the road and right-of-way, and; WHEREAS, this property is located in an R-1 zoning district, and is over 1/2 acre in size, fronts an improved City Street and is served with both water and sewer and is a buildable lot, and; WHEREAS, Hennepin County requires a certified resolution from the governing body be submitted to authorize action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that the Council does hereby authorize and direct the Mayor and City Manager to release for public sale Lot 4, Block 9, Mound Terrace, PID #14-117-24 32 0046, retaining a drainage and utility easement over the Northeasterly 10.00 feet of said lot. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: Acting City Clerk Run: 2-Ju[-96 14:13 OFF01 Primacy ISN'$ ~{y: No )ate Rel:~rted range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 Time~'~e each day: 00:00 - 23:59 ~ ,,. ~spositions: ALL Activity codes: Officers/Badges: All Grids: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ~CT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT 3ODE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED 14199 LIQUOR - OTHER 15313 JUVENILE-CURFE~ [5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 6501 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION 1310 DISTURBING PEACE-FE-STALKING-UNKNOiJN 3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT 30?0 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE 519~,,-~DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 711'b PROP DAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 7120 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT ;110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT ;600 LITTER-UNLA~/FUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS 226 STLN PROP'FE'POSSESS-VENICLES-2500-34999 159 THEFT-MORE 2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP 169 THEFT-501-2500-FE-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP 059 THEFT-201-5OO-GM-YAROS-OTH PROP 169 THEFT'201-5OO-GM-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP 029 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-OTH PROP ]59 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-YARDS-OTHR PROP 159 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTNER If'~''~qEFT-LESS 200-MS-UATERCRAFT-OTH PROP ~13 THEFT-FE-BY CNECK'$501-$2500 ,97 THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-201-500 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 100.0 10 0 10 2 0 8 0 8 ~.0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 0 3 0 1 0 2 3 100.0 2 0 2 0 I 0 1 2 100.0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 10 0 10 9 0 0 1 1 10.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 0 2 1 I 0 0 1 50.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 4 0 4 3 0 0 1 I ~.0 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 Run: 2-Jul-96 14:13 OFF01 Primary ISN's only: No Date Reported range: 05/26/96 - 06/25/96 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Oispositions: AlE Activity codes: ALl Officers/Badges: All Grids: ALL ACT ACTIVITY COOE DESCRIPTION U3288 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-200 OR LESS U3289 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-35000-OR MORE U3498 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS U3499 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO-MOTOR-35000-OR-MORE VB021 VEH-501-2500-FE-THEFT-AUTO W3190 UEAPONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR X3080 X3250 X3360 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-VIOL ORO PROTECTION CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-MS-VIOL HARRASS REST ORDER MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY OISPOSITIONS Page 3 ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT REPORTEO FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 100.0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 P 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 100.0 **** Report Totals: 120 0 120 55 31 18 16 65 54.1 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (~ 2/ FAX (612) 472-0620 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Mayor, City Council and City Manager Joel Krumm, Liquor Store Manager June 1996 Monthly Report July 1, 1996 June, with graduations, weddings, Fathers Day and the first hot days of summer, proved to be an incredibly busy month. Gross sales equalled $164,255. That compares to June of '95 when we did $158,382 in sales. Half of the year has gone by. At this point in time we stand at $753,115 in gross sales. Again, this compares to last year after the first six months when we stood at $705,496. June also saw some new and exciting changes to the exterior premises of our facility. Our parking lot has been restriped and with a different twist to it We now have angled parking directly in front of the store and in the middle. We lost two spaces up front but gained a few more in the middle rows. The slanted parking was accomplished by the installment of two barrier islands located on Domino's side. The intent is to have the flow of traffic enter in one direction and exit in another. This should hopefully also slow traffic down. We will see. We have four new trees on Wilshire Boulevard and two inside the barrier islands in the parking lot. When these trees mature they will provide ample shade to block the rays from the setting sun that enter our store in the early evening. Also they will be aesthetically pleasing. printed on recycled paper CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 July 1, 1996 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER GREG SKINNER, PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT~"~ JUNE 1996 MONTHLY REPORT STREET DEPARTMENT We finished the street sweeping at the very end of May. We had some trouble with the sweepers this year. We had to replace rollers and conveyors on both of them. On the 1980 sweeper, the hydrostat transmission went out. This was replaced along with the PTO, that went out. This is the first major work we put into this sweeper and it is 16 years old. We started water main break repairs. We completed them in June. We will be putting on the final lift sometime in the month of July. We will be fixing a few holes on Gull Lane and Jennings Road due to the MCTO buses that drive over these roads during road restrictions. This happens every year with the buses when they drive on our 4 ton streets. Sealcoating will take place this July in the Highlands area. We will also do some work on Brighton Boulevard, Shorewood lane due to road break ups. City Days went fine for the public works. We did some sweeping prior to the event and after the event. We helped Jim Fackler with some items at Mound Bay Park. I spoke with the company that does the landscaping and yard repair work for the City. This month they will try to repair the cuts in grass caused by snowplows. They are busy, .due to the late spring. These should be done soon. In June we hauled some water main break fill and sweepings out of the Minnetrista stock pile to various locations in Minnetrista for people that are requesting fill. We are still trying to find more places to relocate this excess fill. It is getting more difficult to find time to remove the printed on recycled paper Public Worl~ Department Monthly Report July 1, 1996 Page 2 stuff from out there, it is filling up pretty quick. Hopefully, durin~ rain days we will b~ able to get more out to make room for the water main breaks for this year. WATER DEPARTMENT The water meters are going well, readings are down to 4 or 4 and one half days at the most. We struck a deal with Schlumberger regarding a payment for some of the defective registers that we received during the change out program. It has been working well, they have done a very good job for us. There was a tremendous amount of locates for June from Gopher One Call, for different utilities for new construction. We have some problems with a few contractors regarding erosion control on their new construction sites. Jon Sutherland and myself have come up with a few ways of dealing with these contractors to get them to comply with our erosion control efforts. Hopefully, we will not have these problems in the future. SEWER DEPARTMENT There was one line backup that had to be routed out. It did not back up into any houses. The line was cleaned out. The crew has been out with the Jet Vac doing sewer line maintenance and cleaning sewers. There was a problem with the boom not rotating right or left. We had it fixed. We look forward to cleaning many sewer lines this summer. Lift stations are working fine. A few seals have been replaced in the pumps. One pump's seal went out too soon after installation. In looking into the pump, there was no oil, we believe it came this way from the factory. We will be working with Tri-State on this. I attended the AWWA conference in Toronto this month. I spoke with the owner of a company that we have our auto dialers with while I was there. The company is replacing 11-12 dialers that we are having problems with. He assured me they were working to correct the problem. They will help us get back on line and eliminate these problems. GS:ls MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT ·HIS.. ..LAST ~HIS' YEAR LAST YEAR DNTH OF JUNE 1996 M(~ M01~ TO ~ TO DA~ ~. OF C~ 72 71 417 347 ~OUND FI~ 18 12 ~ ~~ 25 ~ 151 '127 ~INNETONKA BEACH FI~ ~ O 4 ~INNETRISTA ~ ~ 7 Z~ 20 ~o~ ~ 4 17 ~ 5 )RONO ~ ~ 5 39 26 ~G~ 2 3 ~ 2 13 SHOREWOOD FI~ O O O ~~ 0 0 3 1 SPRING PARK FI~ 2 1 ~3 %7 m.~ ~0 ~ 4Q 35 ~~ 1 0 2 1 TOTAL FIRE CALLS Z~ 26 186 152 TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS 44 4~ 231 195 ~ci~ Q 1 7 2 ~ID~ 2 5 23 A~ 4 3 ] 4 11 F~E ~ / FIRE ~ 6 6 7] ~. OF H~ FI~ 5?D 484 2387. 1690 - MOUND ~~ 5~D 6R~ 3]] 7 2602 ~ ~ D~o 1 ] 67 5504 4292 FI~ ] 2 O 67 121 - MTKA BEACH ~~ 37 O 137 ~ 49 O 204 174 ~I~ 1 ~ ~A3 558 517 - M'TRISTA ~.~ 103 65 319 276 ~ ~6 2o~ ~77' 793 FI~ 159 ~%~ ~7~ 6~ - 0RON0 ~~ 41 72 254 ,.329 ~ 2~ 185 1133 10~ Ftm 0 0 0 t0~ - SHOREWOOD ~~. O. O ~ 23 FI~ 26 20 21 ~ - SP. PARK ~G~ 199 5] a~ ~ 225 71 1064 1089 F~ 0 15 76 131 - ~ ~ ~s~ ~3 0 40 T~ ~3 ~5 ~6 ~48 TOTAL DRILL HOURS 1~ 172.5 1037.5 947.5 TOTAL F~RE HOURS 7~ 775 4180 36~ TOTAL EMERGENCY HOURS 923 871 4786 4031 ~ F~E & ~G~ ~S 1653 [~ 89~ 7635 MUTUAL AID RECEIVED O Q Q MUTUA~ AID ~IVgN ] ] 5 MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA FOR MONTH OF. J[)N/7. ]996 FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE 6/3 6/17 RY~S H/iRS HI1RS RA/E 1 JEWF .~,T~'~'~ ~'Y~ X X 2 19.00 3.5 60 6.50 390. O0 2 G~ Ff~ AT~DE~.T X X 2 19.00 3.5 76 6.50 494.00 3 PAI~ B~BB X X 2 19.00 2.5 56 6.50 364.00 4 DAVID ?fIYD X X 2 19.00 2 40 6.50 260.00 5 SCOTT BRYCE X X 2 19 .O0 24 36 6.50 234.OO 6 JIM CASEY X X 2 19.00 0 31 6.50 201.50 --7 S'£gvJ 'COLLINS X X 2 19. O0 4 35 6.50 227.50 8 ~BOB CRAWFORD X X 2 19.O0 3 51 6.50 331.50 9__ RANDY ENGF3_MART X X 2 19.00 1.5 36 6.50 234.00 10 S'£SVE ERICKSON X X 2 19.00' 0 50 7.00 350.00 11 DAN GRADY X X 2 19.00 0 46 6.50 299.00 12 KEVi/~ GRADY X X 2 19.00 1.5 38 6.50 247.00 13 ~PT;C~ ~T~TAFsON X X 2 19.00 2.5 38 6.50 247. O0 14 CP3JG ~F2~ D~SOW X X 2 19.00 0 67 6.75 452.25 15 p.~3~.~ ~,w~2op_ .y X - X 2 19.00 2.5 37 6.50 240.50 16 ~iATT H-~TGE~ X X 2 19.00 2 40 6.50 260.00 17 ~ ROGER KRY$~ X X 2 19.00 0 40 6.50 260.00 18 JOHN LARSON X X 2 19.00 2 34 6.50 221.00 19 JASON ~.[~AS X X 2 19.00 2 38 6.50 247.00 20 JOHN NAFUS X X 2 19.00 0 43 6.50 279.50 21 JAI~ES NELSON X X 2 19.00 2.5 50 6.~0 325.00 22 BRET NICCIR.! X X 2 19.00 12 53 6.50 344.50 23 GREG PAI2.~ X X 2 19.00 2 50 6.50 325.00 24 I'IIKE PALM X X 2 19.00 3.5 44 6.50 286.00 25 TD! PALM X X 2 19.00 2 38 6.50 247.00 26 GREG PEDERSON X % 2 Iq.DO O 39 6.50 253.50 27 CHRIS POUNDER X X 2 ~q-~O Z 5~ .,. 6.50 28 TONY RA~.'rOSSEN X (~_ ~ 0.50 ] 30 6.50 ]05.00 29 RICHARD ROGERS X X 2 19.00 2.5 44 6.50 286.00 _ 30 IIIKE SAVAGE X X 2 19.00 0 5~ 6.50 331.5Q _ 31 f,2iviN SIPPRkJ3. X X 2 19.0Q 4 4~ 6.50 299.00 ~2 RON STALLMAN X X 2 19.00 4 41 6.50 266.50 33 BRUCE SVOBODA X X 2' 19.00 2 51 6.50 331.50 34 ED VANECEK X X 2 19.00 ]:5___ 43 6.50 279.50 --' ~ RICK WILLIAMS X X 2 19.00 10.5 44 6.50 286.00 36 ~1~,! WILLI~2.~S X (~) 1 9.50 3 27 6.50 175.50 37 DENNIS WOYTCKE X X 2 19.00 4 55 6.50 357.50 37 35 72 ' ~.ALS 92.5 87.5 180 684.00 113 1653 RY~S .10,786.25 180 ~TT L'::: 684,00 113 MAINr 1,167.00 /UfAL 12,637.25 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-06o0 FAX (612) 472-0620 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Mayor, City Council and City Manager Jim Fackler, Parks Director June 1996 Monthly Report July 1, 1996 PARKS Summer is in full swing and the crew is keeping up with it's demands. The beaches are all open and the summer parks programs are going well. We have been seeing a flock of around seventy five geese at Mound Bay Park. This again is creating a problem with keeping' the beach clean. Hopefully with the warmer weather people will be in the park at an earlier hour which keeps the geese away. With the lake level remaining high the Milfoil has not been as much of a problem, but I am seeing more erosion on the shore line from wave action. The four new water fountains were installed at Three Points, Swenson, Philbrook and Mound Bay Parks. DOCKS The dock inspector has been very busy making rounds to all the dock sites. Site holders have until June 1st to complete the installation of their dock. Notices are being sent out for noncompliance. TREES Three trees were removed from City property and one tree was marked as a hazard on private land. Weed notices are being handled by CSO's which can get faster compliance because they can write a citation. CEMETERY One of the trees taken down by the City was a very old hard Maple in the old "A" division. This tree covered a large portion on top of the hill and with it's removal will change the area a lot. printed on recycled paper TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR JUNE FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT Investment Activity Bou_clht: Money Market 4M 35,509 Money Market Norwest Bank 4 Money Market First Bank 105,000 CP Norwest Investment 5.51% 504,218 CP FBS Investment 5.42% 249,664 Matured: Money Market First Bank (150,000) CP FBS Investment 5.55% (299,850) Balance: june 30, 1996 $3,822,104 1997 Budqet Early in the month the city manager distributed the 1997 budget calendar. As part of the budget process, each department head prepares a line item by line item proposed budget. Finance made available to them budget sheets that include updated actual expenditures for 1995. We are assisting department heads through the process as needed. Property Tax Reform Who in St. Paul isn't talking about property tax reform? I attended a meeting at the League of Cities on the topic in preparation for next year's legislative session. Our lobbyists at the League are very concerned with this issue which affects the basic financing of cities. State Representative Ann Rest's property tax reform proposal was one of the main discussion items. Her pro- posal breaks the property tax into two separate taxes: * A local services tax for city, county, and special district expenses; and * A state education tax. Each tax would have a separate defined tax base. State aid still would be paid to local governments. The main concern raised so far on Representative Rest's proposal is the lack of details. If you like to know more about this proposal, let me know. City of Mound 07/02/96 Monthly Report Utilities Month of: June 1996 Utility-96 Residential Commercial ~1o. of Customers: Water 1,070 123 123 Sewer 1,072 Water Used: (in 1,000 gallons) 16,914 4,735 Billing: Water $26,754 $6,799 Sewer $49,053 $16,010 $105 $22,914 Recycle $4,963 Total $80,770 Total 1,193 1,195 21,649 $33,553 $65,063 $5,068 $103,684 Payments: Water Sewer Recycle Total $22,318 $42,529 $4,457 $69,304 $4,449 $11,71 4 $90 $16,253 $26,767 $54,243 $4,547 $85,557 07/02/1996 10:13 612--4724435 T0N REESE PAC..~ 81 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 EAST WAYZATA EiOUL£VARO, SUFTE 160 · WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEPHONE 612/473.7033 G. Alan Willcutt. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS DOuglas E, Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Tom Reesa Vice Chair. Mound Joseph Zwak Secretary, Greenwood Robert Rascop Treasurer, Shorewood Kent Dahlen Minnetoflka 6each Bart Foster Deephavan Gretchen Magiich Minnetonka Duane Markus Wayzata Craig Moiler Victoria Craig Nelson Spring Park Eugene Partyka Minnetrista Paul Stark Excelsior /"--'~erb J, Suerth Woodland Orono TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: JULY 3, 1996 FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE SUBSECT: JUNE REPORT- LMCD 1.0 G~neral Item~. 1.1 The District is upgrading its office systems with a new LAN which will allow all the staff to interconnect, to get on e-mail and to access the lntemet. There is a wealth of material relavent to the LMCD mission that is readily available on the net. This will also improve our ability to administer the District, and to archive records, which has been seriously lacking, 1.2 The draft 1997 budget was sent to the cities, There was very little comment. I am assuming that you have reviewed the budget and are in general agreement with it. 2.0 Exotic Species Task Force. 2.1 The boat washing program continues to struggle. Since voluntary participation seems to not work, some more stringent rules may have to be adopted for next year. 2.2 The harvesting commenced June 19, thus far 87 acres have been harvested, mostly in Grays, St Alban's and Gideon's Bays. 3.0 Water Structures 3,1 A simplified rule for High Water condition on the lake was adopted. It provides for a cushion each way before declaring a change. 3.2 Thc second reading ora code revision that would more clearly prohibit the storage of boats within boats on the lake was approved. This was occasioncd by the Bil Hawks boathouse structure on Halsted's Bay. we are Iikcy to hear more of this, perhaps thru the courts. 3.3 Minnetonka Beach has 22 fire lanes that they are presently using for city docks. These sites for the most part, have docks constructed with zero side setbacks to abutting neighbors. This has been challenged by a resident constructing a very large house next to a fire lane. Nothing in writing authorizes such a dock configuration. The potential impact on the city is large. 4.0 Lake Use. 4. I Complaints about high boat wakes continue to proliferate. $.0 Mound Specific Items -i 5.1 ] feel that I have been bypassed on several items where my e_~rl~nvolvement could have benefitted the city financially and in the nature l~'~;~;presentati ye - LMCD lc. Al Willcutt, Doug Babcock. BOARD MEMBERS Douglas E. Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Tom Reese Vice Chair, Mound Joseph Zwak Secretary, Greenwood Robert Rascop Treasurer, Shorewood Kent Dahlen Minnetonka Beach Bert Foster Deephaven Gretchen Maglich Minnetonka Duane Markus Wayzata Craig Mollet Victoria Craig Nelson Spring Park Eugene Partyka Minnetrista Paul Stark Excelsior Herb J. Suerth Woodland Orono RECEIVED JUL 2 1996 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 160 · WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 G. Alan Willcutt, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR June 27, 1996 Edward Shukle CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle: The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors is pleased to enclose its approved 1997 budget, which was adopted at its regular meeting held June 26, 1996. As you are aware, preliminary budget drafts were forwarded to all surrounding communities on May 24, 1996. At that time, a meeting was scheduled on June 4, 1996 for review and comment. In attendance were city representatives who voiced several opinions which were discussed, resulting in no changes to the proposed budget. At that time a final date for comment was established for June 19, 1996, at 4:30 PM. One response was received from the City of Wayzata addressing several issues which were taken into account by the LMCD Board at its June 26, 1996 meeting. At that meeting the proposed budget was adopted. Should you have any questions, please contact the LMCD office. 6(Y'/o Recycled Content 30% Post Consumer Waste Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT G. Alan Willcutt Executive Director GAW omo 0 000 0000 0 000 0000 The following assumptions were nade in the dra£t 1997 Ll(CDBudget: ]%DMINISTRATION Executive Director Administrative Technician Administrative Secretary Administrative Clerk SALARIES CURRENT 1997 $ 48,000 $ $0s919 28,000 $ 29;314 22,000 $ 23~185 10 per hr. ~ 8,000 $111;418 ~MPLOYER BENEFIT CONTRIBUTIONS 4.0 % INCREASE P.E.R.A. (4.23%) P.E.R.A. Life Ins. Commercial Life Ins. F.I.C.A. (7.65%) Medical'Insurance* $ 4,712.98 432.00 43.20 8,523.48 4,933.92 $ 18,645.58 * Current LMCD Health Insurance Policy & Office (900 sq. ft.) Storage ($80/month) ~FFICE LEASE ~ STORAGE ¢#4) $ 16,200.00 960.00 $ 17,160.00 Specialty Bookkeeping Claire Link Other Service pROFESSIONAL SERVICES (~S) $ 7,000.00 $ 2,200.00 800.00 $ 10,000.00 INSURANCE/BONDS (#13J Property $ Inland Marine Municipal Liability Excess Liability w/ Waiver Bond Contingency 100.00 1,023.00 3,510.00 1,230.00 105.00 1,032.00 7;000.00 EXOTICS MANAGEMENT WEED ~ PROGRAM SALARIES & EMPLOYER TAXES/~NSURANC~.-(~33J Salaries $ 29,994.43 F.I.C.A. Insurance Auto Workers ' Compensation 2,294.57 700.00 2,011.00 2,711.00 Total Salaries & Employer $ 35,000.00 Taxes/ Insurance * A new harvester will be purchased in 1997 from the EWM Equipment Acquisition Fund. Salaries (200 Hours) F.I.C.A. Insurance Operation Supplies Education Contingency ZEBRA MUSSE~ PROGRAM 2,400.00 183.60 1,000.00 1;000.00 3,000.00 74L/!~6.40 15,000.00 * A second high-pressure sprayer will be purchased in 1997 :from "Save the Lake" Funds. RESERVE FUND ANALYSIS ADMINISTRATION BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 1995 12-31-94 $193,202- $193,202, $175,630- Allocation 39,625 0 18,500 Transfer to 28,000 9 7,000 Eq. Acq. Fund FUND BALANCE $125,577 $193,202 $150,130 * 12-31-94 AODIT FIGURES ADMINISTRATION EWM 1995 .isWj[ ACTUAL $175,630- 0 ~5,000 $140,630 BUDGET .12-31-95 $125,577 Allocation 0 Transfer to ~ Eq. Acq. Fund FUND BALANCE $125,577 1996 12-31-95 J%~DIT FIGURES $203,971' 0 o $203,971 BUDG~'~ $150,130 50,000 $100,130 1996 ADMINISTRATION ACTUAL $144,910- 50,000 $94,910 X997 12-31-96 0 Transfer to Eq. Acq. Fund FUND BALANCE LMCD Reserve Fund Policy Administrative (6 months) EWM (12 months) $203,971 48,000 35,000 $120,971 1997 $94;910 10,000 o $84,910 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 24, 1996 Those present were: Chair Geoff Michael, Commissioners Frank Weiland, Bill Voss, Jerry Clapsaddle, Gerald Reifschneider, and Orv Burma, Building Official Jon Sutherland and Secretary Peggy James. Absent and excused were: Commissioners Becky Glister, Michael Mueller, and Council Representative Mark Hanus. The following people were also in attendance: McDonald. Wayne Thostenson and Mike MINUTES The Planning Commission Minutes of June 10, 1996 were presented for approval. MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Clapsaddle, to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of June 10, 1996 as written. Motion carried unanimously. CASE 96-26: STREET VACATION CHURCHILL LANE (CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING): MICHAEL & CARRIE MCDONALD, 3018 CHURCHILL LANE, LOTS 19, 20, 21, BLOCK 12, ARDEN, PID 24-117-24 44 0146 Building Official, Jon Sutherland, referred to the Memorandum from Mark Koegler wherein issues were clarified and responses given. Staff supports the vacation of Churchill Road provided that Parcels 141 and 147 (Lots 12 and 22) are combined. The Building Official confirmed that the owner of Parcels 141 and 147 has submitted a request to combine those parcels and it has been sent to the County. Chair Michael noted that at the last meeting the hearing was opened and closed, but the item was tabled for further discussion. Chair Michael asked if there was anyone present who wanted to speak on the issue. Applicant, Mike McDonald, reviewed with the Council that he has discussed this issue with his neighbors and have had not negative responses, other than his one neighbor to the south expressed a concern that if the remaining portion of Churchill is improved, they do not want to be assessed. Chair Michael closed the public hearing. The Building Official added that staff also recommends approval of the variance to allow the decks on the property. Also, approval should be made pending approval of the combination by Hennepin County. The Building Official reviewed the variance is for a deck located on the north side of the dwelling that has a zero setback. MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Reifschneider to recommend approval of the street vacation and variance as recommended by staff. Planning Commission Minutes June 24, 1996 It was questioned when and how this dwelling was built in this location. The owner thinks the house was built in the mid-thirties. Weiland stated reviewed the history of the house and how it was once a garage and it was slowly added onto. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be heard by the City Council on June 25, 1996. CASE 96-34: VARIANCE FOR SHED, GAYLEN & WANYCE THOSTENSON, 502'~ BARTLETT BLVD., LOT 6, BLOCK 3, JOHNS S. CARLSON, PID 24-117-24 12 0007 The applicant is seeking a variance to allow construction of a 10' x 10' portable storage building that will be nonconforming to the north front yard setback. This property fronts on three streets, Bartlett to the south, Avon to the east, and Bayport to the north. Bayport Road is unimproved and it is unlikely it will be improved in the near future. City Code requires, for detached accessory buildings, a setback of 20 feet to the north. The shed is proposed to be placed 4 feet from the north property line, and 6 feet from the west property line. The shed will be portable and could be moved in the future, if needed, and there is a minimal impact at this time. Staff recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the front yard setback to allow construction of a portable 10' x 10' storage building, with a condition that if the street is improved the shed must be relocated to a conforming location. Weiland explained what the property looks like and he feels there is no need for Bayport to ever be improved. He also commented that the shed will not restrict usage of the fire hydrant. Reifschneider stated that the shed will look best in the location which is proposed. Motion made by Voss, seconded by Weiland to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff. Motion carried unanimously. The applicant, Gaylen Thostenson, requested his case to be heard by the City Council on June 25th. VARIANCE STREAMLINING: DISCUSS AND SET PUBLIC HEARINR The Planning Commission has no further comments on the issue or the proposed ordinance amendment. The hearing has been set for July 8, 1996. Planning Commission Minutes June 24, 1996 DOWNTOWN PLAN Clapsaddle asked if the Commission is interested in being more deeply involved with the downtown redevelopment. It is his opinion that they should have been more directly involved. Weiland recalled that they were told the Commission would be involved. Clapsaddle commented that nobody knows what kind of businesses they want to bring in, and he has other questions about the plan such as how they plan to acquire and assemble the land, zoning issues, how do they know what land they want to acquire, etc. Voss indicated that he is in favor of the plan. Clapsaddle expressed a concern that the plan has been changed since they last reviewed it, and noted that the street have been changed, in that Auditor's Road was suppose to be a main artery, but now is shown as a side street. The Secretary noted that Bruce Chamberlain is planning on coming to the second Planning Commission meeting in July to review the plan. Clapsaddle stated that he would also like Paul Meisel and some others directly involved in the plan. He would also prefer the meeting to be more of a work session, opposed to an informational session. Clapsaddle requested the Commission receive the most current copy of the plan prior to the meeting. MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Voss, to adjourn the meeting at 8:03 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Chair, Geoff Michael Attest: 3 AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 9, 1996, 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. o PAGE APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 25, 1996 REGULAR MEETING. .................................. 2291-2298 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A MINOR AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS FOR MEYER'S MOUND SERVICE LOCATED IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 2610 COMMERCE BLVD., PID//23-117-24 14 0043 & 0050. ............................ 2299-2321 ~ RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A GARAGE/SECOND FLOOR ADDITION, RAYMOND BAYLOR, 4790 NORTHERN ROAD. ................................ 2322-2342 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR STAIRWAY AND RETAINING WALL, STEPHANIE COON, 4729 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE. ......................... 2343-2358 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INCREASE IN FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION PENSION BENEFIT EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1996 ......... 2359-2364 CONTINUED DISCUSSION: PROPOSAL FOR NEW DOCK LOCATIONS - LONGFORD ROAD, BRENSHELL HOMES/ FINE LINE DESIGN. (There will be handouts also Tuesday evening) ....... 2365-2382 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ............... APPROVAL OF A QUASI PUBLIC FUNCTION-PORTABLE SIGN APPLICATION FOR THE MOUND WESTONKA CLASSIC, MOUND WESTONKA BASEBALL ASSOCIATION .................... 2383 2288 10. 11. 12. 13. RESOLUTION RELEASING TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY FOR SALE AT 6253 BIRCH LANE, LOT 4, BLOCK 9, MOUND TERRACE, PID 14-117-24 32 0046 ........................... 2384-2391 SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A 30 FOOT WIDE PLATTED RIGHT OF WAY KNOWN AS COBDEN LANE, LOCATED NORTH OF WINDSOR ROAD AND TERMINATED AT LOT 3, BLOCK 1 OF TEAL POINTE LOCATED IN "ARDEN" ADDITION. SUGGESTED DATE: AUGUST 13, 1996 ................ 2392 PAYMENT OF BILLS ................................... 2393-2407 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: Ao DEPARTMENT HEAD MONTHLY REPORTS FOR JUNE, 1996 .................................. 2408-2430 Bo LMCD REPRESENTATIVE'S MONTHLY REPORT FOR JUNE, 1996 ............................... 2431 LMCD MAILINGS - 1997 LMCD BUDGET WHICH RECENTLY ADOPTED BY THE LMCD BOARD .............. 2432-2437 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 24, 1996 .................................... 2438-2440 REMINDER: SPECIAL MEETING RE: POLICE SERVICES STUDY, WEDNESDAY, JULY 10, 7 PM, SHOREWOOD CITY HALL. MAYOR POLSTON AND COUNCILMEMBER JENSEN INDICATED THAT THEY WILL BE ATTENDING ................................. 2289 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF MOUND MElVIO~UM July 9, 1996 City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff Jon Sutherland, Building Official ~'eza7 ~ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-16~t7 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 JUNE 1996 MONTHLY REPORT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY There were 60 building permits issued in May for a construction value of $2,604,486. This included nine new dwellings (none of which were at Pelican Point). This results in 20 new dwellings year-to-date, and last year at this point we had ten. Of the nine new dwellings, four will be built on lots where existing houses are to be demolished. This trend of demolition and rebuilding continues to improve our housing stock, it also results in improving the location of the structures on the lots with regards to setbacks. June was a banner month for our department. The monthly and year-to-date construction activity is record setting, nearly twice that of last years record breaker. A large portion of this month's construction value is also attributed to the addition at St. John's Church and a remodeling project at the Mound Medical building. In addition to our construction activity we worked on a proposal to provide inspection services to St. Boni which, to our disappointment, did not materialize. We also received a number of rental and zoning complaints that are in progress. We issued 28 plumbing, mechanical, and miscellanous permits for a total of 88 permits this month, and 343 year-to-date. PLANNING & ZONING The Planning Commission reviewed eight zoning cases in May including four variances, two minor subdivisions, one conditional use permit and one street vacation request which was continued from May. A public hearing for a proposed zoning ordinance amendment for streamlining variances was set for July 8, 1996. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER (CSO) ACTIVITY Two new CSO's have been hired and started work in mid-June. JS:pj printed on recycled paper City of Mound BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT 'Month: JUNE Year:, 1996 THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 9 9 1,024,109 20 2,114,835 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED (CONDOS) /4 1,155,516 TWO FAMILY / DUPLEX MULTIPLE FAMILY (3 OR MORE UNITS) TRANSIENT HSG. (HOTELS I MOTELS) SUSTOTAL 9 9 1,024,109 24 3,270,351 COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) 2 310,000 OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC I SCHOOLS . SUBTOTAL 2 310,000 ADDITIONS TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING 3 57,167 9 190,027 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 2 31,769 9 82,342 DECKS 12 29,560 22 55,984 SWIMMING POOLS i /400 1 /400 REMODEL-MISC RESIDENTIAL 28 166,076 89 405,348 REMODEL- MULTIFLE DWELLINGS 1 78,640 SUBTOTAL 46 284,972 131 812,741 COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) 2 30 , 000 OFFICE ! PROFESSIONAL BANK 1 95,405 2 104,105 INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC ! SCHOOLS CHURCH' 1 1,200,000 1 1,200,000 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS SUBTOTAL 2 1,295,405 5 1,334,105 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS 3 6 NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 4 TOTAL DEMOLITIONS ' 3 ].0 # PERMITS # UNITS VALUATION ~ VALUATION 24 60 9 2,604,486 5,727,197 TOTAL '172 PERMIT COUNT ITHIS MONTH IYEAR'TO'DATE '] 'BUILDING 60 172 FENCES & RETAINING WALLS 2 12 stuns 0 4 PLUMBING 8 66 MECHANICAL 10 5 6 GRADING 0 2 S&W, STREET EXCAV., FIRE, ETC. 8 31 l TOTAL I ss 1343 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAY~NOOO ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-O620 Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 9, 1996 Mayor and City Council Jim Fackler, Parks Director Lineal Footage of Shoreline Used to Calculate Application for LMCD Commercial Dock License At the last City Council meeting on June 25, 1996, staff was directed "to provide the Council with calculations and a Dock Location Map showing how the computations were done indicating exactly how much shoreline Mound has, and to have the LMCD confirm their computations and figures in writing regarding the amount of shoreline and formula for number of boats and docks for the City of Mound." I forwarded a copy of this motion and related minutes to Greg Nybeck, Administrative Technician for the LMCD (Lake Minnetonka Conservation District), and have attached a copy of his letter written in response to the Council's concerns, see Exhibit #7. From records at City Hall I was able to collect a limited history on the number of dock sites and boat counts that were used when calculating the LMCD Commercial Dock License for the City of Mound from 1978 to present. As you will note on the attached Exhibit #1, from 1978 to 1981 the dock site count was 380. In 1982 there was an increase of 20 sites to 400. In 1988 the LMCD's method for calculating the license fee changed from counting dock site locations to counting boats. As shown on the bottom of the first page of Exhibit #2, the LMCD application form, boats are the same as Boat Storage Units (BSU's) and are computed, according the formula, into Water Storage Units (WSU's) to determine our annual fee. As you can see, by using this formula, Mound's fee can vary from year to year while the actual site locations remain consistent. The WSU's have varied by as many as 192 when comparing high and low counts, and BSU's have varied by 120. printed on recycled paper LMCD Memorandum July 9, 1996 Page 2 The BSU's that are allowed for the City of Mound's LMCD Commercial Dock License are based on the total lineal footage of the non-contiguous shoreline owned by the City that is above the DNR's ordinary high water elevation (OHW) of 929.4. The total lineal footage is divided by 50 lineal feet (one BSU = 50 ln. ft.) to determine the number of BSU's allowed for the City. In looking at how the City of Mound had represented its claimed shoreline in the past for a commercial license, I found four basic dock location maps that were used in the calculation. 1974 to 1976 the map did not reference lineal footage, see Exhibit//3. The dock site numbers on the map were random and the lineal footage is unknown. 1977 to 1982, Exhibit #4, was the first map that applied lineal footage to identify each dock site location. This map started the measurement of lineal footage at Avocet Lane on Three Points (West Arm Bay), and continued around the shoreline ending on Bay Ridge Road on Halsteads Bay. The total lineal footage noted was 70,050. In checking with the City Engineer on who prepared these maps, he said the information for the lineal footage was probably collected by City staff using a combination of surveys and half sections maps. 1982 to 1995, Exhibit #5, is a continuation of the 1977-82 map format, but it was visually enhanced by the engineering firm of McCombs Frank Roos and Associates. This map still used lineal footage, but shows a reduction in the total lineal feet of 8,735 to a total of 61,315. I am not aware of any history as to why this was changed, and what areas were affected. 1983 to present, Exhibit #6. The current dock location map shows nine revision dates, beginning in 1982, but still maintains the total lineal footage of 61,315. It has always been understood by staff that the dock program utilizes approximately 4-1/2 miles of shoreline which is a portion of the total 6 miles of noncontiguous shoreline under the City's control. In comparing 6 miles of claimed shoreline, or 31,680 lineal feet, this does not balance with the dock location map which shows 61,315 lineal feet. Yet when using the LMCD's requirement of one BSU per 50 lineal feet, 31,680 lineal feet would allow for 633.6 BSU's. As you can see from Exhibit #1, the number of BSU's has not exceeded the number allowed by the LMCD. LMCD Memorandum ,hdy 9, 1996 Page 3 Because there is an understandable question as to what is the correct lineal footage of non- contiguous City owned shoreline, the current dock location map can be updated and the amount of lineal footage clarified by one of two ways: Staff could make use of current records based on half section maps and the use of surveys that are currently on hand. This would give only a close approximation of the lineal footage. A Registered Land Surveyor could be contracted, which would cost about $20,000 to survey portions of the claimed shoreline in need of clarification while utilizing surveys already on file and half section maps. The results of an in-depth survey raises two scenarios: If it is found that the City is exceeding the allowable number of BSU's, then the City must reduce the count. This can only be done by removing boats. A method would have to be determined on how to reduce the BSU's. With 447 dock sites, the number of BSU's would have to be strictly controlled by the City and a policy or ordinance established to direct staff on how to issue maximum BSU's between the sites. This will put strict limitation on a dock site holders ability to change the number of boats at their dock site. If it is found the City has enough BSU's, we can continue on with a more up-to-date dock location map and accurate limits on BSU's that the dock program can accommodate. Only if the BSU's are nearing the maximum allowed by the LMCD is there a need for a policy or ordinance to be established to direct staff on how to control the issuing of BSU's per dock site. A LMCD representative will be present at the July 9th Council meeting. YEAR DOCK SITES BSU (BOATS) WSU 1978 380 1979 380 1980 380 1981 380 1982 400 1983 4OO 1984 40O 1985 4OO 1986 4OO 1987 400 '1988 400 587 746 1989 443 581 719 1990 444 516 615 1991 447 467 554 1992 449 501 606 1993 447 485 582 1994 447 487 601 1995 447 514 634 1996 447 489 604 1988 was the first year that the City of Mound's LMCD Multiple Commercial Dock License was based on BSU's. Prior to 1988 the fees were calculated by the dock site count. Exhibit g2 LA~II YI~ 199~ RENEWAL WITHOtFf CIfANGE APPLTCATION MULTIPLE &/OR COIOI~RCIAL DOCK, AND LAUNCHING (Phone Num~er) (Address) (Cl~y) (Zip) certify ~hat no changes are to be Bade in ~he dock con£iquration or in number of boats stored for lake use, of the , located at in the City of , riparian to Bay, during ~he 1996 season; that all information and attachments on file with ~he District for' last year's application will Me applicable to ~he license being applied for; and ~hat a new license will be obtained free the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District before Baking any change. Type of facility: Musher of Boat Storage Units (BSU), for which you arm licensedc Number of Moats stored by use (enter husker of BSU in each category): Rent, lease ..... , Service work .... Private use..... Tramiient Use .... Off Lake Storage OtheF use . .... .. Describe: Watercraft Storage Units (WSU) computation schedule (enter number of BSU and WSU in each slip lisa categozy): BSU SLIP SIZE CATEGORIES WSU BSU e I WSU (up to & incl. 10' wide x 30' long) BSU e 1.5 WSU (up to & i~cl. 11' wide x 34' long) BSU 0 2 WSU' (up to & incl. 12' wide x 32' long) BSU @ 3.5 WSU (up 1:o & incl. 14' wide x 40t long) BSU ~ 3 WSU (up ~o ~ incl. 16' wide x 48' long) BSU 0 4 WSU (over 16' wide x 48' long) WSU WSU WSU Wsu BSU Total .... Total WSU for which you arm licensed - wsu Dock ~new&l Ap91i=at£on ].§§6 FF~~T~ON; Bale Fee .................................. . ................. $ SQ.QQ TOTAL LICENSE FEE (Non-refundable) ......................... - $ THE APPLICATION IS DUE ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 19__95. You may pay in full, or au~mit a deposit of 20% of ~le licenee fee ($100 minimum) with your application ON OR BEFOI~ 12/1/95. PAYMENT SCHEDULE:, Total License fee paid wl~h application Depolit of 20% of license fee (or $1OO minimum) $ $ LATZ ~ZE $,C~. ZDULE:. If application il received AFTER 12/1/9S, a late fee of 10% of ~he 20% deposit amount (or $10 nih.) ~u~t Me adde~. Xf appli~ation is received A~TEa X2/21/95, a late fee of 20~ of the 20% deposit amount (or $20 ~im.) ~ust Me adde~. _ If application il received AFTER ~/28/96, a late fee of 30% of the 20% depolit amount (or $30 min.) must Me added._______ · Ore If application is received AFTE~3/31/96, a late'£ee o£ 30% cf the ~ LICENSE FERAMO~Tault Me added.......... TOTAL LICENSE FEE DUE FOR 1996 AMOUNT PAiD WITH APPLICATION BALANCE DUE ON OR BEFORE 3131196: I certify that the information provided herein and ~he attachments hereto are true and correct. ! understand that any licenee issued Me revoked ~ the District for violation of ~t ~CD C~e. X agree to re4-~rse ~e Dis~ric~ for any legal, s~eying, engimeering, ins~ction, main=enanca, or o~ar e~enoes re. ired ~at are ~ ~e Dis~rict in ass~inq c~pliance wl~ ~t ~ C~o ~d~ which ~is applica=ion would ~ qranted. I congen~ ~o pe~i~tinq ~ime8 ~o lnve~=igata and to de~e~ine whaler or not ~e C~e of ~e Distric~ is ~ing co, lied wi~. Authorized Signatu~e Title Relationship to Owner _ Return ~o: Lake Hlnnetonka Conservation District 9o0 Z. Wa2zata nlvd, Suite Xeo, Wayza~aHH 5S391 473-7033 CItY OF Exbiblt /t3 H 0 U N D MINNESOTA WOODLANO Pq ~ \ pRtEST lvIUNICIPALIT¥ :OF MOUND ISSUED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS nq COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEP.~I::[TI~NT OF ~tANSPORT~TION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION DATA OBTA.IlqKD AND MAP PREPARED BY TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT PLANNING AND PROGRAMI~NG DMSION OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SCALE 800' 0 SOO' ISpO' 1976 BASIC DATA-- 1969 ,/ Exhibit #4 ?' ~o~Z LEGEND INTERSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY .................... N o CLos B CLass. C CLass MINNETRISTA Woodland Poi~ 8ay Exhibit #4 ~VD. 8LVO. ~ MAYWCO0 ~ ~. DR. 4+ 7oo5o Trailer Court Eagle Bluff DR. Pr/est Langdon La#e ~. Say MINNETRISTA I ,I CITY OF Exhibit ?. H 0 U N D 0 0 0 0 0 0 DOCK MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 1982 FEBRUARY 1984 MAY 1984 NOVEMBER 1989 DECEMBER 1990 DECEMBER 1991 0 DECEMBER 1992 0 0 0 DECEMBER 1994 ~" LOCATION 0 0 0 MAP Class A: Class B: Class C: Class D: Cias~ E: Porks Shoreline Classifications Shoreline that is traversible only on top: need stairway to shoreline, accessible by public fight-of-way. Shoreline traversible along the water's edge: access points available to traversible shore- line. Shoreline with no traversible space: stairs needed to shoreline, not accessible by pub- lic right-of-way (abutting ~_r_operty owners only). Shoreline that is traversible on the top, and traversible along the water's edge: acces- sible by public right-of-way. Shoreline such as wetlands, wildlife area, beaches and boa~ ' -din~. No Dot, cs. I ,I ii il¸, 06'~ OOg )oIg ~o~g )O£g )Ot~g ~ b..i bJ ~ ij.j bJ )OOg I ,i C~lt,~O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I~ ~ o~ 0 o o o ~ 0 0 0 0 CITY OF Exhibit '#6 H OUND 0 0 DOCk MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 1982 FEBRUARY 19B4 MAY 19B4 NOVEMBER 1989 OECEMBER 1990 DECEMBER 199 I DECEMBER 1992 OECEMBER 1994 MARCH 1996 LOCATION 0 0 MAP Type A: Type B: Type C: Type D: Type E: PQrks, Shoreline Types Shoreline that is traversible only on top: need stairway to shomJJne, accessible by public right-of-way. Shoreline traversible along the water's edge: acc~ poinl~ available to traversible shore- line. Shoreline with no Izaversible space: stairs needed to shoreline, not accessible by pub- lic right-of-way (abuaing property owners only). Shoreline that is traversible on the top, and traver~ble along the water's edge: acces- sible by public right-of-way. Shoreline such as wetlandz, wildlife area, beaches and boat landings. No Docks. 20000 ONR BAY e.,~ , ltl Exhibit #6 i ~eqch pR~ BAY BOARD MEMBERS Douglas E. Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Tom Reese Vice Chair, Mound Joseph Zwak Secretary, Greenwood Robert Rascop Treasurer, Shorewood Kent Dahlen Minnetonka Beach Bert Foster Deephaven Gretchen Maglich Minnetonka Duane Markus Wayzata Craig Mollet Victoda Craig Nelson Spring Park Eugene Partyka Minnetdsta Paul Stark Excelsior Herb J. Suerth Woodland Orono 60'/° Recycled Content 30% Post Consumer Waste BI ,lB I I Il IG I l i .... ~1 Exhibit-//7 ?. to,t?. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT goo EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 160 o WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 - TELEPHONE 612./473-7033 July 5 t 199 6 G. Alan Willcutt, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. Jim Fackler, Parks Director city of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Jim: RECEIVED J U L 0 8 1996 MOUND PLANNING & INSR I have drafted a short memo to address the dock issues outlined in your memo of 7/1/96 and City Council Minutes. As previously outlined in the memo of 6/5/96, the maximum number of Boat Storage Units (BSU's) allowed in the City of Mound multiple dock license is directly related to accumulative shoreline. LMCD Code Section 2.02, Subd. 1 "allows for the storage of one watercraft for each 50 feet of continuous shoreline." The Code allows Mound to place BSU's in a specific location with a density greater than 1:50, provided, the total number of BSU's for the cities multiple dock license does not ex~eed one watercraft for every 50 feet of shoreline. LMCD staff does not have the ability to accurately determine the amount of accumulative shoreline in Mound dedicated for your multiple dock license. The records we have on file will be consistent with yours at the City of Mound. If your City Council determines there is a need for an updated shoreline count dedicated for your multiple dock license, you may want to recommend a survey be done. A representative from the LMCD will be available' at your 7/9/96 City Council to answer any questions the City Council may have. Feel free to call me if you need additional information or have questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Administrative Technician enci: 6/5/96 memo cc: .Tom Reese- LMCD Board (Mound) S I I II, ,Jk, I ,I.,, i,,, · LAKI::: ]NNI TONKA CONSERVATION DISTRIGT 900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 160 - WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 - TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 ~'une 5, 1996 G. Alan Willcutt. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS Douglas E. Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Tom Reese Wce Chair, Mound JoseDt~ Zwak Secretary, Greenwood Robert Rascop Tre3surer, Shorewood Kent Dahlen Minnetonka Beach Bert Foster Deephaven Gretchen Maglich Minnetonka Duane Mamus Wayzata Craig Moiler Victoria Craig Nelson Spring Park Eugene Partyka Minnetrista Paul Stark Excelsior · Herb J. Suerth Woodland Orono Mr. Jim Fackler City of Mound 5341 Ma~-aood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Jim: Per conversation, I have drafted a memo outlining how dockage rights in Mound are interpreted by LMCD Code. LMCD Code Section 2.02, Subd. i "allows for the storage of one restricted watercraft for each 50 feet of continuous shoreline.- In the calculation of shoreline for LMCD cities with a multiple dock license, LMCD Code allows these cities to accumulate total shoreline despite the shoreline may not be continuous. The Code also allows the cities to place Boat Storage Units (BSU's) in a specific location with a density greater than 1:50 provided the total number of BSU's for the city multiple dock license does not exceed one restricted watercraft for every 50 feet of shoreline. With regards to the docks to be placed on Longford Road, this would be allowed provided that all aspects of LMCD Code are complied with. In 1997 when your renewal application for your multiple dock license is submitted, an adjustment in BSU's will need to properly note t~e increase on Longford Road. Feel free to call me if you need further clarification on this matter. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Administrative Technician cc' Tom Reese- LMCD Board (Mound) 30% Po~l Co~"~s~'~er W~s~e