The URL can be used to link to this page

1996-12-10 AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1996, 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVE AGENDA - At this time items can be added to the agenda that are not listed and/or items can be removed from the Consent Agenda and voted upon a~er the Consent Agenda has been approved. *CONSENT AGENDA: PAGE *A. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 11/26/96 REGULAR MEETING .......................................... 4343-4348 *B. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 12/4/96 TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING ............................ 4349-4350 *C. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL 1997 GENERAL FUND BUDGET; SETTING THE FINAL TAX LEVY; CERTIFYING THE FINAL LEVY AND APPROVING THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR 1997 .................................... 4351-4353 *D. RESOLUTION APPROVING CEMETERY FEES FOR 1997 ...................... 4354 *E. *F. *G. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS RE: VARIOUS FEES AND LICENSES. (To be handed out Tuesday evening) SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A MODIFICATION TO THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTIES FROM R-1 TO R-lA. SUGGESTED DATE: JANUARY 14, 1997 ............................ 4355-4356 SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND RELATED VARIANCES FOR THE "MAPLE MANORS" RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. SUGGESTED DATE: JANUARY 14, 1997 ............................ 4357-4358 4341 Mound City Coundl Agenda Decembe I0, 1996 Page 2 ~,~ *H. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MCES) RE: INFLOW/INFILTRATION CONTROL PROGRAM .................... *I. APPROVAL OF HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT .................... *J. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MEETING DATE AND TIME OF THE MOUND HRA BOARD ................................... *K. PAYMENT OF BILLS .......................................... REQUEST FROM STEVE BEDELL TO SELL BEER FROM 'BY THE WAY SNACK SHOP" LOCATED AT 4801 SHORELINE...~. 'y.¢~...t~..~.. ?. :... COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: A. DEPARTMENT HEAD MONTHLY REPORTS FOR NOVEMBER 1996 ......................................... B. 4359-4377 43784380 4381-4383 4384-4397 4398-4403 4404-4426 LMCD REPRESENTATIVE'S MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 1996 ............................................. 4427 REMINDER: COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND SECOND COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER ARE CANCELLED. REMINDER: ANNUAL CHRISTMAS PARTY IS SUNDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1996 AT AL & ALMA'S. 4342 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 26, 1996 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, November 26, 1996 at 7:30 PM, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Mark Hanus Absent and excused: Phyllis Jessen. Liz Jensen was scheduled to arrive later. Also in attendance: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, Economic Development Coordinator Bruce Chamberlain and Acting City Clerk Linda Strong. The following interested citizens were also present: Bob Bittle, Keith and Bernice Putt, Carl Hanson, Greg and Martha Cote, Denise Larson, Betty Dom, Mark Jorland, Councilmember-Elect Leah Weycker and Greg Eurich. The Mayor opened the meeting. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Mayor Polston announced that Roger Stephanson had won 50 Westonka Dollars for his recycling effort. He was not present to accept his winnings. The dollars will be mailed to him. 1.0 APPROVE AGENDA - At this time items can be added to the agenda that are not listed and/or items can be removed from the Consent Agenda and voted upon after the Consent Agenda has been approved. The Council approved the agenda. 1.1 *CONSENT AGENDA: The Council consensus was to remove from the Consent Agenda two items and discuss them separately. MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Hanus to approve the amended Consent Agenda. A roll call vote was called. The motion carried unanimously, 3-0. '1.2 APPROVE MINUTES OF THE 11/12/96 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Ahrens, Hanus, unanimous. '1.3 VARIANCE FOR WAIVER OF PLATTING, GREG AND MARTHA COTE, 1601 GULl, LANE, WOODLAND POINT CASE//96--65. RESOLUTION//96-119 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A WAIVER OF PLATTING AND RELATED SETBACK VARIANCES, 1601 GULL LANE, LOTS 1-4, BLOCK 12, WOODLAND POINT, PID 13-11%24 12 0238, PZ g96-65 Minutes - Mound City Council - November 26, 1996 Ahrens, Hanus, unanimous. '1.4 RESOLUTION//96-118 Ahrens, Hanus, unanimous. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND EXPRESSING STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE LOST LAKE CANAL AND GREENWAY PROJECTS IN DOWNTOWN MOUND. '1.5 APPLICATION FOR BINGO PERMIT - OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CHURCH. Ahrens, Hanus, unanimous. · 1.6 PAYMENT OF THE BILLS. Ahrens, Hanus, unanimous. 1.7 APPROVE MINUTES OF THE 11/19/96 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING. Councilmember Hanus requested adding clarification to a sentence under the Lineal Footage - Dock Program paragraph. Third sentence, "The agreed upon number was 620 of which about 30 docks would be reserved for Lost Lake." MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Hanus and carried unanimously to approve the Minutes of the 11/19/96 Committee of the Whole as amended. 1.8 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED REDESIGN OF THE LOST LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESS. Councilmember Hanus discussed with the Council the comments of the Planning Commission regarding whether to accept the new design or not to accept. The turn-around as it is now, appears to look like a marina. However, Hanus does not want to risk the current plan, that could lead to refusal of permits. Bruce Chamberlain, Economic Development Coordinator, stated the current relationship with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is good and he did not want to jeopardize this. The design meets the goals and intent of the project. Chamberlain agreed that the suggestions of the Planning Commission had some good points. The redesign, as it is now, addresses the environmental issues. He was concerned with the legality of the upland dredging. Hanus suggested they continue to explore possibilities if there was not a time problem. City Attorney Curt Pearson suggested the Council 2 Minutes - Mound City Council - November 26, 1996 adopt the resolution and add to it the comments of the Planning Commission. City Manager Ed Shukle stated that renegotiating the plans could lead the MCWD to not approve any permits. Hanus agreed to not create problems, to go with the redesigned plans. Pearson suggested the Council approve the present plans, submit application and include alternate plan indicating concerns. Mayor Polston stated he liked the redesign plans, it gives everything that was needed; he was opposed to changing them. Ahrens stated the redesign looked more like a marina, not the tranquility of the first plan. Hanus concurred. He stated it might be possible to design a phase 2 in the future and make a new application. He also noted that several docks would not be installed now, but at a later date through a private endeavor. Ahrens moved and Hanus seconded a motion to approve the following resolution as presented: RESOLUTION g96-120 RESOLUTION TO MODIFY THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE LOST LAKE CANAL AND GREENWAY PROJECTS. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried 3-0. 1.9 PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO SHERWOOD DRIVE. John Cameron, City Engineer, reviewed the feasibility report he had prepared. His conclusion was that it was feasible to complete this project as petitioned for by eight abutting property owners. (Councilmember Jensen arrived at 7:50 PM) Mayor Polston opened the public hearing. Denise Larson, 5574 Sherwood Drive. She stated she did not sign the petition. She saw no problem with the road structurally. She was opposed to the improvement. She would be assessed the largest amount and would probably have to sell her home and move. She stated the improvement would really affect only a few houses on the end of the cul-de-sac. The people with the water in their basements should improve their own private property to prevent the water from running into their basements. Carl Hanson, 5501 Sherwood Drive. He stated that the street is not that bad. Maybe put an overlay on the top and add new curbing. He asked how often the street had been repaired? He had originally signed the petition, but now felt the cost was too high. He suggested the City do an overlay and keep the cost down. Bernice Putt, 5510 Sherwood Drive. She stated that she had signed the petition, but in seeing the estimated cost, she felt it was too high also. Greg Eurich, 5535 Sherwood Drive. He stated he lived on the comer of County Road 110 and Sherwood Drive. His house is below the road, would more water mn down his driveway when the road was improved? John Cameron, City Engineer, stated that the new curbing and current storm sewer 3 Minutes - Mound City Council - November 26, 1996 would prevent more water from running into his driveway. Cameron stated that soil borings had not been done to see if the base of the road was in good shape. There were no documentation as to the number of repairs that had been done and how often and what the cost was. He suggested a report be prepared by Mr. Skinner for information. He also suggested that soil borings could be done to test the base. Also, it could be possible to do an overlay and new curbs. The cost could be lowered by 1/3 if only an overlay and new curbs were done. Mayor Polston stated he didn't think that an overlay should be done if the road base was bad, that would only create a bad road in 2-3 years and not last the 20 year time of a totally new road. Reducing the cost could reduce the quality of the road. Denise Larson asked if a report could be prepared by the Public Works Superintendent as to the repairs done. Mayor Polston asked if there were any comments either for or against the improvement project on Sherwood Drive. There were none. He closed the public hearing and returned the item to the Council. Councilmember Hanus suggested obtaining more information before proceeding with the project. City Attorney Pearson stated that the report was prepared according the request of the petitioners. Cameron stated that the project needed 35 % of the frontage owners agreeing. The properties on the cul-de-sac, where the problem lies, has the least amount of frontage on Sherwood Drive. Mayor Polston suggested the public hearing be continued until repair reports and soil borings could be completed to see determine the need, and then discuss the improvement. MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Hanus to continue the public hearing on the improvement of Sherwood Drive until January 28, 1997, and authorize the city engineer to do necessary soil borings to determine the base of the road and repair reports be prepared. The motion carried 4-0. 1.10 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A MODIFICATION TO THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN PROPERTIES FROM R-1 TO R-lA. (WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT). City Manager Ed Shukle stated the public hearing notice had been retracted at the applicant's request. The applicant will start over and a new notice published when the time arises. 1.11 APPLICATIONS FOR NORTHWEST TONKA LIONS "WINTERFEST" TEMPORARY BEER PERMIT AND QUASI PUBLIC SIGN. Bob Bittle, Northwest Tonka Lions, explained to the Council the events planned for the January 1 lth and 12th. The purpose was to raise money for the Minnesota Diabetes. The fireworks were scheduled 4 il It 14 I, ,It, ~11~, J ,I,i~ Minutes - Mound City Council - November 26, 1996 for 6 pm on Saturday the 1 lth. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Jensen, and carried unanimously to approve the temporary beer permit and quasi public signs for the Winterfest to be held January 11-12, 1997. 1.12 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. There were none. 1.13 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RESIGNATIONS OF CURRENT HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT (HRA) MEMBERS AND APPOINTING THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE THE MOUND HRA. City Manager Ed Shukle stated that the replacement of the current HRA Board with the Council had been discussed at the last Committee of the Whole meeting. The reason is because it was difficult to find persons to be on the Board. Several cities currently have their council as the HRA Board. They could meet once a month, prior to the scheduled City Council meeting. He noted the city attorney had stated the current board had to resign. The resignations were in the packet. Jensen moved, Hanus seconded a motion to approve the following resolution: RESOLUTION//96-121 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RESIGNATIONS OF CURRENT MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HRA) BOARD MEMBERS AND APPOINTING THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS THE MOUND HRA. The vote was unanimous, 4-0, motion carried. 1.14 APPROVAL OF DOCK APPLICATION FORMS FOR 1997. City Manager Ed Shukle stated there were not many changes in the 1997 forms. He did indicate the Parks and Open Space Commission did create a separate sheet with information pertaining to "combined dock use" that would be inserted into the mailings. He also mentioned a motion made at the May POSC meeting stating: "A dock license will not be issued for any dock on public land where the applicant has a correction order pending concerning a stairway or structure used to access the dock, unless otherwise approved by Staff." The due date was changed to 2/28/97 from last year's date of 2/29/96. Councilmember Hanus stated the combined dock use was an idea created to reduce the congestion of docks along the shoreline, and for safety. Minutes - Mound City Council - November 26, 1996 MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens, and carried unanimously to approve the 1997 Dock Application Forms as presented. 1.15 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: Bo Eo Go FINANCIAL REPORT FOR OCTOBER, 1996, AS PREPARED BY GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR. PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MINUTES OF 11/14/96. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES OF 10/17/96. ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RE: ANNUAL TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY TO BE HELD TUESDAY, 12/3/96, 6:30 PM, AT THE DOWNTOWN CHRISTMAS TREE. CITY OFFICES WILL BE CLOSED FOR THANKSGIVING ON THURSDAY AND FRIDAY, 11/28 & 29. REMINDER: TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING IS SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, 12/4/96 AT 7:30 PM. REMINDER: NO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OR SECOND MEETING OF DECEMBER WILL BE HELD, ONLY REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER IS 12/10. REMINDER: ANNUAL CHRISTMAS PARTY IS SUNDAY, DECEMBER 15TH AT AL AND ALMA'S. YOU RECEIVED YOUR INVITATION IN YOUR COW PACKET. PLEASE RSVP TO LINDA OR JILL BY 12/11. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 pm. City Manager Attest: Acting City Clerk 6 MINUTES - TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING 1997 BUDGET - MOUND CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 4, 1996 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session for the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing on Wednesday, December 4, 1996, at 7:30 PM, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Mark Hanus, Liz Jensen. Absent and excused: Phyllis Jessen. Also in attendance: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., Parks Director Jim Fackler, Building Official Jon Sutherland, Police Chief Len Harrell, Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner, Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Councilmember-Elect Leah Weycker and Acting City Clerk Linda Strong. The following interested citizens were also present: Paul Huber, Gina and Mark Smith. The Mayor opened the meeting. 1.0 1997 PROPOSED BUDGET COMMENTS City Manager Ed Shukle reviewed the proposed 1997 Budget mentioning each of the funds. At the Mayor's request the proposed budget projects a zero percent increase in the property tax levy from 1996. Shukle mentioned this will be accomplished by increasing building permit fees to correspond with the 1994 UBC, which would raise an estimated $110,000. Also, the General Fund Balance is now at 35 %. There was a change in the Recycling Fund as the Council wanted to keep the spring cleanup. The budget and levy must be certified on or before December 28, 1996. Mayor Polston asked if there were any questions from the Council for the City Manager. There were none. The Mayor introduced Gino Businaro, Finance Director. Businaro reviewed with the Council the proposed levy for 1996 and 1997. He discussed how the property tax is determined, and compared 1996 to 1997. Businaro touched on the several types of properties that pay taxes, Market Values and Tax Capacities. Mayor Polston thanked all of the department heads for their efforts in producing this proposed budget. 1.1 PUBLIC HEARING Mayor Polston opened the public heating and asked if there was anyone present who wished to speak regarding the 1997 proposed budget. Paul Huber, 1801 Commerce Blvd. Mr. Huber, owner of Huber Funeral Homes, discussed with the Council the assessed value increase and tax raise of 12% and questioned what had happened since the Local Board of Review had lowered the value in May. The Council requested a copy Minutes - Truth in Taxation - Mound City Council - December 4, 1996 Page 2 of his document to research with the County. There were no more comments from citizens present. The Mayor closed the public hearing. 1.2 MOTION MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Hanus to set December 10, 1996, at the regular City Council meeting to adopt the proposed 1997 budget as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Ahrens to cancel the continuation of the 1997 proposed budget public hearing that was scheduled for December 11, 1996. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 pm. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. City Manager Attest: Acting City Clerk De~mb~r 10, 1996 RESOLUTION APPROVUNG THE FINAL 1997 GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,591,760; SETTING THE LEVY AT $1,863,940; LESS THE HOMESTEAD AGRICULTURAL CREDIT (HACA) OF $490,980, RESULTING IN A FINAL CERTI~-'~ED LEVY OF $1,372,960 APPROVING THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR 1997 BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following final 1997 General Fund Budget appropriations: City Council Promotions Cable TV City Manager/Clerk Elections & Registration Assessing Finance Computer Legal Police Emergency Preparedness Planning and Inspection Street City Property & Buildings Parks Recreation Contingencies Transfers 69,370 4,000 800 193,470 2,100 59,480 168,960 23,550 114,460 924,350 4 100 172,870 405 270 82 840 148 550 36 200 20 000 161,390 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,591,760 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the County Auditor to levy the following taxes for collection in 1997: Budget Resolution//96- December 10, 1996 Page 2 SPECIAL LEVIES Bonded Indebtedness 84,690 Unfunded Accrued Liability of Public Pension Funds 33,350 Total Special Levies 118,040 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE LEVY 1,745,900 TOTAL TO BE LEVIED FOR 1997 1,863,940 Less Homestead Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA) -490,980 FINAL CERTIFIED LEVY 1,372,960 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the final overall budget for 1997 as follows: As per above 2,591,760 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Area Fire Service Fund Capital Improvement Fund Cemetery Fund Dock Fund 336,020 379,690 8,100 68,440 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 792,250 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Recycling Fund Liquor Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund 118,950 289,020 429,300 1,020,460 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 1,857,730 Budget Resolution//96- December 10, 1996 Page 3 SUIVIMARY General Fund Special Revenue Funds Enterprise Funds TOTAL ALL FUNDS 2,591,760 792,250 1,857,730 5,241,740 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby held a Public Heating on Wednesday, December 4, 1996 for consideration of the 1997 Proposed Budget and determined that the Wednesday, December 11, 1996, meeting was not necessary. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: Acting City Cl6rk Resolution adopted: December 10, 1996 RESOLUTION De~.ember 10, 1996 RESOLUTION TO SET PRICES FOR CEMETERY LOTS IN THE MOUND UNION CEMETERY AS PROPOSED STARTING JANUARY 1, 1997 WHEREAS, the Cemetery Fund is used to account for revenue received from the sales of lots and expenditures for care and maintenance of the City owner cemetery; and, WHEREAS, the City's current charges as stated below, were raised from $200 to $300 for residents and $400 to $600 for non-residents for 1996; and, Adult Grave Resident $300.00 Adult Grave Non-Resident $600.00 Baby Grave Resident $100.00 Baby Grave Non-Resident $150.00 Ash Burial No additional charge if grave is purchased as a single burial. $25.00 charge, if ash burial is placed on top of a casket burial. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the following prices for cemetery lots in the Mound Union Cemetery are hereby starting January 1, 1997: Adult Grave Resident $350.00 Adult Grave Non-Resident $650.00 Baby Grave or Cremains Baby Grave or Cremains Resident $175.00 Non-Resident $325.00 All open and close handled through funeral home. Ash Burial No additional charge if grave is purchased as a single grave. $50.00 charge if ash burial is placed on top of casket burial. Arrangements must be made for opening through City Staff. CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE//96-68 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A MODIFICATION TO THE ZONING MAP TO REZONE THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTIES FROM R-1 TO R-lA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, JANUARY 14, 1997 to consider a Modification to the Zoning Map from R-1 Single Family Residential (10,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) to R-lA Single Family Residential (6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size), for the property as .shown on the attached map and legally described as follows 5490 Three Points Blvd. (vacant land): That part of the West 100 feet of Lot 25, "Lafayette Park Lake Minnetonka" lying north of the South 345 feet of said Lot 25; Also that part of the East 50 feet of the West 150 feet of said Lot 25 lying northerly of the northerly right-of-way line of Three Points Boulevard; Also that part of the East 100 feet of the West 250 feet of said Lot 25 which lies north of a line drawn east at fight angles to the west line of said Lot 25 from a point on said west line distant 318.29 feet north, as measured along said west line, from the southwest comer of said Lot 25. PID 13- 117-24 22 0249. 5510 Three Points Blvd.: That part of the West 100 feet of the South 250 feet of said Lot 25 and of the East 50 feet of the South 250 feet of LOt 26 lying North of Three Points Blvd. PID 13-117-24 22 0246. 5470 Three Points Blvd.: That part of the East 100 feet of the West 250 feet of said Lot 25 lying South of a line run East at a fight angle with the West line of said Lot 25 from a point thereon 318.29 feet North from the SW comer of said Lot 25 and lying N of Three Points Blvd. PID 13-117-24 22 0250. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. PeggfJ~tnc~s, l~anni~(g Secretary Published in "The Laker" on January 4, 1997, and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property by January 4, 1997. I (2o) DOC NO (264) ........ 240 .............. 729 366 (265) ~ (27 ALI ~ARK $75 DOC NO 46a3163 7pT OF LOT 77 246) (249) 5 (22) ~(5) i LA PART LOT APT OVal NO 8 SEAHORSE PART 0¢ LOT 25 I (?~6) 1(78) (INIU~ PART (58-245) (255-zs6) 9 (47) OUTLO1 (57) , ! NOIE, DETAIL OF ~ )qARRI SON SHt SEE RECORDi ~ Il I ,ii J, ,J ~ JJ.,, J ll~ CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 5341 MAY~NOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 CASE ~6-69 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND RELATED VARIANCES FOR THE "MAPLE MANORS" RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, JANUARY 14, 1997, to consider the approval of a preliminary plat, a planned development area by conditional use permit, and related variances for the residential development called Maple Manors. The proposal is for the construction of five twin homes at the following described property: 5490 Three Points Blvd. (vacant land): That part of the West 100 feet of Lot 25, "Lafayette Park Lake Minnetonka" lying north of the South 345 feet of said Lot 25; Also that part of the East 50 feet of the West 150 feet of said Lot 25 lying northerly of the northerly right-of-way line of Three Points Boulevard; Also that part of the East 100 feet of the West 250 feet of said Lot 25 which lies north of a line drawn east at right angles to the west line of said Lot 25 from a point on said west line distant 318.29 feet north, as measured along said west line, from the southwest comer of said Lot 25. PID 13- 117-24 22 0249. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Pe~y-Ja~eg, ~annin~ Secretary Published in "The Laker" on January 4, 1997, and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the subject property by January 4, 1997. prtnted on recycled paper ~ON¥~ '4qdYR ti "i ,;I ILl .I : I RESOLUTION g96- /c¥~¢~' December 10, 1996 RESOLUTION APPROVING LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (MCES) REGARDING INFLOW/ INFILTRATION CONTROL PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Metropolitan Council and a benefit to the metropolitan area to reduce excess inflow and infiltration (I/I) into local sewer systems which discharge into the Metropolitan Disposal System, in order to reduce costs, increase system capacity, and delay the necessity to undertake capital improvements; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has allocated funds to be used for loans to communities serviced by the Metropolitan Disposal System in order to fund projects for the elimination of excessive community inflow and infiltration into the local sewer systems; and, WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Mound to reduce inflow and infiltration into its local sewer system in order to increase capacity, reduce costs and delay the necessity to undertake capital improvements; and, WHEREAS, the City of Mound is eligible to receive an I/I Control Program Loan and has submitted an application for such a loan; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has reviewed the application and desires to assist the City of Mound by the award of an I/I Control Program Loan; and, WHEREAS, attached is a proposed loan agreement for this program between the Metropolitan Council and the City of Mound for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota hereby approves of its participation in the I/I Control Program and agrees with the terms of the agreement and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement. Loan No. INFLOW/INFILTRATION CONTROL PROGRAM LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CITY OF MOUND TttlS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Metropolitan Council (the "Council') and City of Mound (the 'Lendee'), each acting by and through its duly authorized officers. WItEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Metropolitan Council and a benefit to the metropolitan area to reduce excess inflow and infiltration ('Ill') into local sewer systems which discharge into the Metropolitan Disposal System, in order to reduce costs, increase system capacity, and delay the necessity to undertake capital improvements; and WltEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has allocated funds to be used for loans to communities serviced by the Metropolitan Disposal System in order to fund projects for the elimination of excessive community inflow and infiltration into the local sewer systems; and WltEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Lendee to reduce inflow and infiltration into its local sewer system in order to increase capacity, reduce costs, and delay the necessity to undertake capital improvements; and WltE~S, the Lendee is eligible' to receive an Inflow/Infiltration Control Program Loan and has submitted an application for a such a loan; and WItERF_AS, the Council has reviewed the application and desires to assist the Lendee by the award of an Inflow/Infiltration Control Program Loan. NOW, TltEREFORE, the Council and Lendee agree as follows: I. LENDEE PERFORMANCE OF LOAN PROJECT 1.01 Loan Project Activities. The Lendee agrees to perform and complete in a satisfactory and proper manner the project as described in the Lendee's application for loan assistance ('Loan Project'), incorporated in this agreement by reference, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. Specifically, the Lendee agrees to perform the Loan Project descn'bed in Exhibit A, which is attached to and incorporated in this agreement. The Lendee may engage contractors to perform the Loan Project. However, the Lendee retains primary responsibility to the Council for performance of the Loan Project. ti5 ~,o I1 il J l, ,It, ~ll~, J ll~ 2 1.02 Material Representations. The Lendee agrees that all representations contained in its application for loan assistance are material representations of fact upon which the Council relied in awarding this loan and are incorporated in this agreement by reference. 1.03 Lendee Certification. Lendee certifies that the loan funds to be distributed pursuant to this agreement will be applied to the purposes stated in this agreement and that the Loan Project is cost effective. 1.1M Governing Body Resolution. Lendee will provide the Council with a copy of a resolution by its governing body which authorizes the Lendee to enter into this agreement. II. AUTHORIZED USE OF LOAN PROCEEDS AND MATCHING FUNDS 2.01 Authorized Uses. The Lendee is authorized to use the loan funds only in payment of the line item costs specified in Exhibit B, which is attached to and incorporated in this agreement. No other use of loan funds is permitted. Loan and matching funds may be used only for costs directly associated with Loan Project activities. 2.02 Unauthorized Uses of Loan Proceeds. Loan funds cannot be used to purchase land, buildings, or other interests in real property, or to pay overhead or indirect costs, legal fees, or permit, license, or other authorization fees, unless specifically approved in advance by the Council. 2.03 Reversion of Unexpended Funds. All funds loaned by the Council under this agreement that have not been expended for the Loan Project during the Project Activity Period (as defined in section 6.01) will be repaid to the Council. 2.04 Project Equipment and Supplies. Loan and matching funds may be used to purchase or lease equipment, machinery, supplies, or other personal property directly necessary to conduct the Loan Project. The Lendee will comply with the personal property management requirements described in paragraph 7.10 of this agreement. III. LOAN AMOUNT, DISTRIBUTION, AND REPAYMENT 3.01 Total Loan Amount. The Council will pay to the Lendee a Total Loan Amount of $40,000. Provided, however, that in no event will the Council's obligation under this agreement exceed the lesser of: a. the Total Loan Amount of $40,000; or, b. fifty percent (50%) of total Loan Project expenditures. 3 The Council will bear no responsibility for cost overruns which may be incurred by the Lendee in performance of the Loan Project. 3.02 Lendee's Match. The Lendee has an obligation under this loan agreement to share in the costs of the Loan Project by providing at least a fifty percent (50%) cash or in-kind match. Accordingly, the Lendee agrees to provide $40,000 in matching funds ('Lendee's Match") during the Project Activity Period. The Lendee agrees that there will be no reduction in the monetary amount of match unless there is at the same time a proportionate reduction in the Total Loan Amount. 3.03 Distribution of Loan Funds. Loan funds will be distributed by the Council according to the following schedule: Upon commencement of the Loan Project funded by this loan, the Council will distribute to the Lendee fifty percent (50%) of the Total Loan Amount, referred to in this agreement as the 'Initial Principal.' be Upon Council approval of the final reports required by paragraphs 5.01 and 5.02, the Council will distribute to the Lendee the final payment of the remainder of the Total Loan Amount, referred to in this agreement as the 'Later Principal.' No payment will be made which would cause the Total Loan Amount to exceed fifty (50%) of projected total project costs. No payment will be made if the Lendee is not current in its reporting requirements under article V. Distribution of any funds or approval of any report is not to be construed as a Council waiver of any Lendee noncompliance with this agreement. 3.04 Loan Repayment. a. Repayment Terms. The Total Loan Amount (or such lesser amount as is actually loaned) will be repaid by Lendee in five equal annual installments, together with accrued interest at the rate of five percent per annum, in accordance with the schedule described in section 3.04(b). For loan amounts distn'buted prior to the Project Completion Date (as defined in section 6.01), interest will accrue from and after the Project Completion Date. For loan amounts distributed after the Project Completion Date, interest will accrue from and after the actual date the loan amount is distributed to Lendee. The principal portion of each installment payment will be considered a repayment of Initial Principal and Later Principal (as defined in section 3.03) in the proportion each amount bears to the Total Loan Amount. b. Loan Repayment Schedule. Attached as Exlu~oit C is Lendee's Preliminary Loan Repayment Schedule setting forth the schedule of loan repayments, along with accrued interest. This schedule assumes: 1) that the Initial Principal and Later Principal 4 under section 3.03 will be equal; 2) that the Project Completion Date will be the same as the end of the Project ActMty Period; and 3) that the second loan payment under section 3.03(b) will be made two months after the end of the Project Activity Period. If any of the assumptions in the previous paragraph vary from the actual amounts or dates, the Council may make, or the Lendee may request, an adjustment of the Preliminary Loan Repayment Schedule to reflect the changed amounts or dates. In such case, the annual installment dates will be determined using the methodology set forth in section 3.04(c). Such an adjustment must be made or requested within six months of the actual Project Completion Date. In such event, the Council will provide Lendee with a revised schedule of loan repayment which will be considered the Permanent Loan Repayment Schedule. If no adjustment in the schedule is made or requested within six months of the actual Project Completion Date, the Preliminary Loan Repayment Schedule will be the Permanent Loan Repayment Schedule. The date on which each annual installment is due under the Loan Repayment Schedule is referred to in this agreement as an 'Annual Installment Date.' Lendee may repay the entire loan balance, with accrued interest to the date of payment, at any time. c. Schedule Adjustment. For the purposes of this section the term "Anniversary Date" will be defined as follows: The last day of that month which is 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the Project Completion Date (as defined in Section 6.01) of the Loan Project. However, in the event the Loan Project is not completed before the end of the Project Activity Period, the end of the Project Activity Period will be considered the Project Completion Date for the purposes of this definition. If the Preliminary Loan Repayment Schedule is adjusted pursuant to section 3.04(b), the first annual installment will be due on the first Anniversary Date and the remaining installments on each consecutive Anniversary Date thereafter until paid in full. d. Repayment Forgiveness. Repayment of the amounts loaned is subject to the loan forgiveness provisions of Section 6.03. IV. ACCOUNTING AND RECORD REQUIREMENTS 4.01 Documentation of Project Costs and Income. All costs charged to the Loan Project, whether paid with loan proceeds or charged as the Lendee's match, must be supported by proper documentation, including properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, or vouchers, evidencing in detail the nature and propriety of the charges. 4.02 Accounts and Records. The Lendee agrees to establish and maintain accurate, detailed, and complete separate accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all loan funds and the Lendee's Match required by this agreement, including all project documents, financial records, supporting documentation, and the property records required by paragraph 7.10. These project accounts and records will be retained intact by the Lendee for at least three (3) years following the full repayment of the loan. These requirements will survive closeout of the loan agreement. 4.03 Audit. The Lendee agrees to keep and maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence pertinent to its performance under this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices consistently applied. Such books, records, documents and other evidence will be maintained until the latest of: Complete performance of this agreement; or Three (3) years following the full repayment of the loan; or If any litigation, claim, or audit is commenced during said three (3) year period, when all such litigation, claims or audits have been resolved. During the time of such maintenance, authorized representatives of the Council will have access to all such books, records, documents and evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying during normal business hours. The Lendee will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. These requirements will survive closeout of the loan agreement. V. REPORTING AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 5.01 Final Activity and Expenditures Report. Not later than two (2) months after the Project Completion Date or the end of the Project Activity Period (whichever is earlier), the Lendee must submit a final report for Council review and approval describing the activities and expenditures for the Loan Project and containing a final accounting of loan and matching expenditures. The final report must include a list of project personal property as required by paragraph 7.10. 5.02 Final Project Summary Report. Upon completion of the Loan Project and not later than two (2) months after the end of the Project Activity Period, the Lendee must submit three (3) complete copies of a 'Final Project Summary Report' for Council review and approval. The Summary Report will contain at a minimum the following I I ,ii l, ,,11, ~ I1!,, I 6 information obtained during and as a result of the Loan Project: a. An overall summary of the completed Loan Project work scope and activities. b. An overall summary of the location of the Loan Project, a description of the sources of Ill removed from the system, an estimate of Ill reduced or removed as a result of the project, a list of potential follow-up project(s) in other areas to reduce or eliminate I/I sources, and a cost-benefit analysis of the Loan Project based on the estimated I/I removed from the system. c. An acknowledgment of the requirement for Lendee certification under section 6.02 and the methods, including a schedule with dates and locations of inspections, to be used by the Lendee in making the certifications. d. Copies of reports, studies, inspections, etc. made prior to the Loan Project, documenting the conditions of the system which lead to the project. 5.03 Content of Reports. The Lendee agrees to report completely and to provide the Council with any additional or follow-up information as may be requested by Council staff. 5.04 Copies. [Deleted] 5.05 Other Monitoring Activities. To assist the Council in monitoring compliance with the loan agreement, the Lendee agrees to attend Lendee meetings as requested by Council staff and to permit site visits by Council staff, during business hours, upon reasonable notice. The Lendee agrees to submit to the Council a. copy of any promotional information regarding the Loan Project disseminated by the Lendee during the loan Period. 5.06 Changed Conditions. The Lendee agrees to notify the Council immediately of any change in conditions, local law, or any other event that may affect the Lendee's ability to perform the Loan Project in accordance with the terms of this agreement. VI. PROJECT ACTIVITY PERIOD/LOAN FORGIVENESS PROVISIONS 6.01 Project Activity Period. The Project Activity Period will consist of the time period from August 16, 1996 (the date this loan was awarded by the Council) until July 31, 1998. The Lendee agrees to substantially complete the Loan Project activities descn'bed in Exhibit A during the Project Activity Period. The Council will not provide loan funds to the Lendee for any Loan Project activities taking place before, or after the end of, the Project Activity Period. The Loan Project will be considered substantially complete when it can be utilized for the purposes for which it is intended and such date is referred to in this agreement as the 'Project Completion Date.' 7 6.02 Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Certifications. Lcndee will provide the Council with a Certification of Project Performance 30 days before thc first Annual Installment Date (as defined in section 3.04(b)) and 30 days before each Annual Installment Date thereafter (through the fifth Annual Installment Date). The Certificate of Performance will be signed by an engineer registered in the state of Minnesota and will certify that in his/her professional judgement and based on inspections carried out under the supervision of the Engineer the inflow and infiltration removed pursuant to the Loan Project have not returned to the system during the twelve month period prior to said Certification. On the third and fifth Annual Installment Dates, along with the said Certification, Lendec will also provide the Council with physical documentation supporting the Certification. Exhibit D contains additional specific certification requirements which Lcndee agrees to implement. 6.03 Loan Forgiveness Provisions. The Council will review the Certification (and other documentation as required by Section 6.02), submitted by Lendee prior to each Annual Installment Date, to determine its adequacy. The Council may request, and the Lendee will provide, additional information or documentation in order to carry out such review. a. Positive Determination. If, in the Council's sole discretion and after review of the Lendee certification, it determines that the Loan Project continues to be successful, that is, that the inflow and infiltration removed pursuant to the Loan Project have not returned to the system in significant quantities during the twelve month period prior to the said Certification, then the Council may forgive the Lendee's loan installment principal payment, along with accrued interest on the forgiven principal, for that Annual Installment Date. The Council will promptly notify Lendee if it qualifies for such loan forgiveness. b. Negative Determination. If, in the Council's sole discretion and after review of the Lendee certification, it determines that the Loan Project does not continue to be successful, that is, that the inflow and infiltration removed pursuant to the Loan Project have returned to the system in significant quantities during the twelve month period prior to the said Certification, then the Council will notify the Lendee that the installment payment, along with accrued interest, for that Annual Installment Date will not be forgiven and is due and owing in accordance with the schedule set forth in section 3.04. In such case, Lendee will have the following options: 1. Lendee may make a request, in writing, to the Council for an extension period of up to three months fi.om the Annual Installment Date, for payment of the installment payment, for the purpose of carrying out additional work at its own expense in order to satisfy the Council's requirements. If at the end of such extension period the Council determines that such work does satisfy its requirements, it will notify the Lendee of that fact and that the installment principal payment, along with 8 any accrued interest on the forgiven principal, for said Annual Installment Date is forgiven. If at the end of such extension period the Council determines that such work does not satisfy its requirements, it will notify the Lendee of that fact and the installment principal payment, along with accrued interest (including interest for the extension period), for the said Annual Installment Date will become due and owing upon receipt of said notice. 2. Alternatively, Lendee may determine that it does not desire to pursue additional work because such work would not be productive or otherwise not in Lendee's interest. In such case, Lendee will make the installment payment, along with accrued interest, on the said Annual Installment Date, and will thereafter repay the Loan in accordance with the schedule set forth in Section 3.04. If a Loan Project fails to obtain loan forgiveness for any period in accordance with this section, all future installment payments will be made in accordance with Section 3.04 and Lendee will not be eligible for any future loan forgiveness. va. c.g g com)rrioNs 7.01 Amendments. The terms of this agreement may be changed by mutual agreement of the parties. Such changes will be effective only upon the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and the Lendee. 7.02 Noncompliance by Lendee. If the Council finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the Council may terminate the agreement at any time following seven (7) days' written notice to the Lendee and upon failure of the Lendee to cure the default within the seven-day period. If the Council finds that the Lendee's noncompliance is willful and unreasonable, the Council may terminate or rescind this agreement and require the Lendee to immediately repay the loan funds in full or in a portion determined by the Council. Nothing herein will be construed so as to limit the Council's legal remedies to recover loan funds. 7.03 Unauthorized Use of Loan Proceeds. Upon a finding by Council staff that the Lendee has made an unauthorized or undocumented use of loan proceeds, and upon a demand for repayment issued by the Council, the Lendee agrees to promptly repay such amounts to the Council. 7.t)4 Indemnification. The Lendee assumes liability for, and agrees to indemnify, protect and hold harmless the Council, its members, officers, employees, and agents, from any liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, claims, injuries, penalties, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising out of the performance of the Loan Project by Lendee or Lendee's employees, agents, or subcontractors. 7.05 Public Data. The Lendee agrees that the results of the Loan Project, the reports submitted, and any new information or technology that is developed with the assistance of this loan is in the public domain and may not be copyrighted or patented. 9 7.06 Equal Employment Opportunity; Affirmative Action. The Lendee agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. In particular, the Lendee agrees not to discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or participant in the Loan Project because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, disability, age, or national origin, and further agrees to take affirmative action so that applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to all aspects of employment and compensation. 7.07 Acknowledgment. The Lendee will appropriately acknowledge the loan assistance made by the Council in any promotional materials, reports, and publications relating to the Loan Project. 7.08 Compliance with Law. The Lendee agrees to conduct the Loan Project in compliance with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws. 7.09 Permits and Approvals. The Lendee is responsible for obtaining all local and state permits, licenses, and authorizations necessary for the Loan Project. 7.10 Personal Property Management. Title to all personal property acquired with loan or matching funds will remain with the Lendee during the Project Activity Period. Accordingly, the Lendee will take reasonable measures to protect and defend its title interest and will keep the personal property free and clear of any liens, encumbrances, or other claims. The Lendee must maintain property records that include, at a minimum, a description of the property, a serial or other identification number, the acquisition date and cost, and the location, use, and condition of the property. In the final report required by paragraph 5.01, the Lendee will include a list of all personal property acquired with loan and matching funds which was not expended in performance of the Loan Project. At the end of the Project Activity Period, the Lendee agrees to transfer title to all personal property acquired in whole or in part with loan funds and not expended in the course of the Loan Project to the Council, at the Council's option and at no charge. The Council reserves the right to direct appropriate disposition of all personal property, acquired in whole or in part with loan funds, which has not been expended in performance of the Loan Project. During the Project Activity Period, the Lendee bears the risk of loss of, damage to, or destruction of any personal property acquired with loan or matching funds. No such loss, damage, or destruction will relieve the Lendee of its obligations under this agreement. The Lendee agrees to maintain personal property acquired with loan or matching funds in good operating order. If, during the Project Activity Period, any i I ii I, ,It, ~11~, I ld~ 10 project personal property is not used in performing the project, whether by planned withdrawal, misuse, or casualty loss, the Lendee will immediately notify the Council's authorized agent. Unless othenvise approved by the Council's authorized agent, the Lendee will remit to the Council a proportional amount of the fair market value of the item(s), if any, determined on the basis of the proportion of Council loan funds used to acquire the item(s). 7.11 Effect of Project Closeout. The Lendee agrees that project closeout does not invalidate continuing obligations imposed on the Lendee by this agreement. Project closeout does not alter the Council's authority to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review, and does not alter the Lendee's obligation to return any funds due to the Council as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions. IN WITNESS WItEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized representatives on the dates set forth below. 11 Date: By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Regional Administrator Approved as to form: Metropolitan Council Office of General Counsel I I J ,I, ,It, ~11~, EXHIBIT A - PROJECT ACTIVITIES & SCOPE CITY OF MOUND The project activities and scope proposed by the city of Mound includes the inspection for, and the ordinance enforcement of, illegal sump pump connections within the City. The sump pump inspection project is to encompass the entire City and entail the inspection of every residential home connected to the sanitary sewer system. Activities within the project scope include: 1. Select sump pump inspection contractor. Implement public information and education campaigns notifying residents of sump pump inspections and the need to enforce existing sump pump disconnection ordinance. Campaign to include direct mailings, and local news articles. Conduct visual inspections in every residential home connected to sanitary sewer system. There are an estimated 3,100 homes connected to the sanitary system each requiring an inspection. Where sump pumps are found to be connected to the sanitary sewer, require that they are disconnected. 4. Conduct visual re-inspections in those residential homes initially found to have a sump pump illegally connected to the sanitary sewer. Upon completion of all inspections, and review of inspection reports, a summary report will be prepared. Summary report to include overall summary of completed project, description and location of III sources removed, and acknowledgement of certification requirement including method, schedule with dates and locations. Report shall also include complete list of addresses where sump pumps were found to be connected to the system during the initial inspection. Project activities will be conducted using a combination of City staff personnel, contracted service vendors and consultant services. EXHIBIT B - PROJECT BUDGET CITY OF MOUND Total project as outlined in the City's project program activities has been estimated at $101,175. Of this amount the City proposes to finance approximately 60% or $61,175 using City funds, and finance the remaining 40% using the $40,000 loan. Total project cost estimate is based on 3,100 home inspections. An itemized breakdown of the project costs have been summarized in a letter from the City, dated August 16, 1996 and is attached an hereby part of Exhibit B. (See attached summarized study cost letter) McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North. Plymouth Minnesota 55447-4739 Telephone 612/476-6010 612/476-8532 FAX Planners Sur':eyors August 16, 1996 Mr. William G. Moore General Manager, Wastewater Services Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 SUBJECT: City of Mound ' ' ,' : ', MCES Matching Loan I/I Control Project MFRA #11357 Dear Mr. Moore: The City of .Xlound is pleased to be selected as a participant in your matching loan program to control I/I. As requested, we are enclosing an itemized breakdown of the costs associated with the proposed project. Also included is a proposed method of certification for the project on the third and fifth year anniversary date of the project completion. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact myself or the City of Mound. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:pry cc: Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager, City of Mound e:\main:\11357kmoorS-16 An Equal Opportunity Employer ITEMIZATION OF COST * Individual Home Inspection 3,100 eachat $21.75/each = $ 67,425.00 Re-inspections 150 each at $25.00/each = $ 3,750.00 Consulting Services (City Engineer - MFRA) 75 hours at $80.00/each = $ 6,000.00 Television Inspection and Certification Inspections $ 8,000.00 City Expenses Staff Time (Office personnel and Public Works) Mailings and Miscellaneous Printing expenses Legal Expenses Total Estimated Project Cost $ 12,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1.500.00 $ 101,175.00 Attached are copies of 3 quotes from firms that are proposing to do the individual home inspections. The City has not made a final decision on which firm will be retained; therefore the middle price has been used for purposes of this cost estimate. Method of Certification Third Year 1. Review water well pumping records, sewage lift station pumping data and compare MCES yearly billings. 2. Visual inspection of a minimum of 30% of the original homes found to be in violation. 3. Television inspection of selected sections of gravity sewer mains. Fifth Year 1. Continued review of water well pumping records and sewage lift station pumping data. 2. Visual inspection of additional 45% of the original homes found to be in violation, bringing total certification inspections to 75%. 3. Continued program of TV inspection of gravity sewer mains. EXHIBIT D- CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS CLEAR WATER DISCONNECTION'S The first, second and fourth year certification shall be based on findings resulting from an inspection of at least 20% of all non-compliance connections identified during the initial inspections. On the third anniversary date, along with said certification, Lendee shall also provide the Council with physical documentation in the form of visual inspection records supporting the certification of 20% of all non-compliance connections identified during the initial inspections, and those connections that were found during the first and second year certifications to be reconnected to the system after the original disconnection. On the fifth anniversary date along with said certification, Lendee shall also provide the Council with physical documentation in the form of visual inspection records supporting the certification of 20% of all non-compliance connections identified during the initial inspections, those connections that were found during the third and fourth year certifications to be reconnected to the system after the original disconnection, and an additional number of re-inspections to be chosen by the Council. The additional properties that the Council selects to be m-inspected will be from those identified in the "Final Project Summary Report," according to paragraph 5.02, as being non-compliant prior to the project. The total number of additional inspections as chosen by the Council shall not exceed 10% of the total number of non-compliance connections as discovered during the original inspection. Each years certification inspections shall represent different connections from those inspected during other years so that at the end of the five year certification period every non-compliance connection shall be inspected at least once. Thirty days prior to the community performing the certification inspections during the third and fifth year, the Lendee will notify the Council in writing so that a representative fi-om the Council has the opportunity to be present during the inspections. All properties to be inspected for certification shall be identified prior to the inspections and a list of said properties along with a map showing their locations shall be sent to the General Manager of Wastewater Services Department for review and comment. Certification inspections shall be performed during periods when FI sources would typically be discharged into the system. The inspections shall consist of visual observations of the sump pump discharge points located outside the building limits. In the absence of evidence that shows sump discharges outside the building, a visual inspection of the sump pump plumbing inside the building will be required. In the event that any property is found to be reconnected to the sanitary system during the certification inspections, that property shall be disconnected fi-om the system. DRAFT HOUSING GOALS AGREEMENT METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT PRINCIPLES The city of Mound supports: 1. 2. A balanced housing supply, with housing available for people at ali income levels. The accommodation of all racial and ethnic groups in the purchase, sale, rental and location of housing within the community. A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the life-cycle. A community of well-maintained housing and neighborhoods, including ownership and rental housing. Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs. · The availability of a full range of services and facilities for its residents, and the improvement of access to and linkage between housing and employment. GOALS To carry out the above housing principles, the City of Mound agrees to use benchmark indicators for communities of similar location and stage of development as affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the period 199'~'to 2010, and to make its best efforts, given market conditions and resource availability, to remain within or make progress toward these benchmarka. Affordablllty Ownership 76% 60-69% 607O Rental 47% 35.37% Life-Cycle T~ete (Non-single family 22% ached) 257o Ownerlrunter MIz 7S/2S% (67-7S) / l)ensJty Single-Family Detached 2.S/acre 1.8-1.91acre 2.5 ACRE Multifamily 22/ach 10-14/acre 14 ACRE To achieve the above goals, the City of Mound elects to participate in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Local Housing Incentives Program, and will prepare and submit a plan to the Metropolitan Council by June 30, 199~, indicating the actions it will take to carry out the above goals. CERTIFICATION Mayor Date 210 RF_SOL~ON//96-111 RF_$OL~ON ELECTING TO BEGIN PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUN1TIY~ ACT CALENDAR YEAR 1997 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 473.121; and, Wl:W. REAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and, WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes Section 473.254; and, WltE~AS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life-cycle housing goals for that municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and, WHEREAS, by June 30, municipalities electing to participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions they plan to take to meet the established housing goals; and, Wl:tEREAS, the Metropolitan Council must adopt, by resolution after a public hearing, the negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for each municipality; and, WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and, WHEREAS, for calendar year 1997, a metropolitan area municipality that did not participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1996, can participate under Minnesota Statutes Section 473.254 only if: (a) the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1996; (b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality successfully negotiate affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the municipality; and (c) the Metropolitan Council adopts by resolution the negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the municipality. Resolution ~-111 October 22, 1996 Page 2 NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Mound hereby elects to participate in the local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 1997. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jessen and seconded by Councilmember Jensen. The following Couneilmembers voted in the affirmative: Hauns, Iensen, lessen and Polston. Ahrens absent and excused. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: None Attest: Acting City Cler~ Mayor RESOLUTION ADOPTED: OCTOBER 22, 1996 December 10, 1996 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MEETING DATE OF THE MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the former members of the Mound HRA have all resigned; and, WHEREAS, the Mound City Council appointed new members to the Mound HRA at its November 26, 1996 meeting; and, WHEREAS, the Mound City Council appointed itself to be the Board of the Mound HRA; and, WHEREAS, the Chair Person, Bob Polston, and Vice Chair Person, of the Mound HRA are designated to sign expense checks on behalf of the HRA, as presented by the Executive Director of the HRA; and, WHEREAS, the meeting time of the Mound HRA will be the second Tuesday of the month at 6:30 pm, at Mound City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Chair and Vice Chair will sign expense checks and the official meeting time of the HRA will be the second Tuesday of the month at 6:30 pm, prior to the regular scheduled City Council meeting. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: Acting City Clerk Resolution adopted: December 10, 1996 November 26, 1996 RESOLUTION//96-121 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RESIGNATIONS OF CURRENT MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT (ItRA) BOARD MEMBERS AND APPOINTING THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS THE MOUND lIRA WHEREAS, the City of Mound has a Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA); and, WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed citizens to serve as board members of the HRA for many years; and, WItEREAS, many volunteers have graciously accepted serving on the HRA board during those years to oversee the Indian Knoll Manor subsidized housing project and to oversee other housing and redevelopment matters in the City of Mound; and, WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the Mayor and City Council that replacing members who have chosen to resign or not wish to be reappointed to another term has been difficult; and, WHEREAS, recently, a majority of members on the HRA board have chosen to resign from the board leaving the HRA with no board to oversee the Indian Knoll Manor facility or to conduct other business of the HRA; and, WHEREAS, these events have prompted the Mayor and City Council to evaluate the HRA as a separate board from the City Council and to look at other alternatives to conduct the business of the HRA. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council, upon careful consideration, has determined that in the best interests of the City of Mound, it should accept the resignations of the current HRA board members effective December 3 i, 1996. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound hereby appoints itself to serve as the HRA Board of Directors in the following capacity following that date: Mayor Bob Polston Councilmembers Chair Andrea Ahrens Mark Hanus Liz Jensen Leah Weycker (Currently Councilmember-Elect to be sworn in as a Councilmember on January 14, 1997) i ri 14 l, ,It, ~ IIJ,, J Resolution ~96-121 November 26, 1996 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Council are to serve as the HRA Board as long as they are on the City Council. This resolution was moved by Jensen, seconded by Hanus. The following vote was recorded: Ayes: Ahrens, Hanus. Sensen and Polston Nays: None Attest: Acting City I~lerk Mayor Resolution adopted: November 26, 1996 BILLS · December 10, 1996 BATCH 6113 BATCH 6114 Total Bills $243,715.93 92,375.54 $336,091.47 I 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,.%) i ':'[ i:' :ii!:i 0 C 0 © C. 0 0 © C 0 © 0 :"~ .',g ir'; Ii I td ,I, ,It, ~lii, I Ii~ i~, ~1 C~ C~ C C. C, C. 0 0 C, g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : © C: C 0 0 C .0 0 0 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ © ,'.3 0 C' 0 0 © 0 0 0 ¢) "0 0 0 © 0 0 0 0 eq PlnOM eo.K)qo sno!^qo eLLL 'sJeleoq JOj uo!lsenb s!ql JeMSue 1eLI1 e)lel eq~, ol esop Jo uo sseulsnq ,~UeLU eJe eJeq.L .'§u~,eoq eJe ~eql el~qM se§eJeAeq eql eseLtoJnd ol eJeqM Jo uo!lsenb e Allensn s! ~ '§u~eoq el!qM seSeJe^eq O!lOqOOle )tu!Jp ol §u!o§ eJe spuepj Jo dnoJ§ e j! jo uo!lsenb e lou ~llensn s! 1! eoue!Jedxe ~uJ LUOJ_-I 'S!ql JO e§elue^pe IIn~ e)lel sJeleoq lsoLu peo!lou eAeq ! uo e^!l I leuueqo ~snq eql q§noJql ssed /~eql se s~qeq s. Jeleoq §u!~Jesqo puc ~IeS,~LU §U!leoq el!qM 'e~luoleuu!~ e~te-I uo l~eJO JeleM e 5U!leJedo el!qM se§eJe^eq O!loqool~ ~lu!Jp Ol leSel s! 1! MOUe! lie eM S¥ 'UO!leOOi ~UJ 1~ Jeeq lies o), sJeLuolsno ~ua jo %cj6 inoqe ~q Pe)tse ueeq e^eq OSle i 'sle oe[ eJ!l pue sJeqs!n§u!lxe eJ!j lies iI!M I UOp,!ppe Ul 'pJ~oq UO eO!^ep uo!lelOlJ elqe MOJql e e^eq ol leoq qoee §up!nbeJ MCI Meu e JO sJeleoq lJele ol IOJled JeleM eql ql!M ~;lleLUJOlU! §UppOM eq i1.~ I/_6 jo JeLuLuns eql Ul 'MeJp §!q e eJeM/~eql pue lies I suJel! ~UeLU eql Ol sJe§!o peppe I J~e~ lSe'i 's~uelqoJd ~ue lnoql!M pelonpuoo ueeq seq sseu!snq pue Inisseoons ueeq seq ~,eql doqs )loeus I~UOS~es e pelJels ! o§e sJee~ OM.L 'slueLULiS!Iq~lse leOOt eldnoo e le Jepuel~eq ~ se Pe>lJOM e^~q I sJee~ ue^es lsed eql JO_-I '/~l!sJe^!uf'i elelS ole~UelAI LUOJJ uJs!ieuJnol' puc suo!leleE! o!lqnd u! eoue!os jo JOleqoeB e e^eq ! '1! jo lseJ eql eJeq eA!l O1 ueld pue eJ!! eJ!lue ~LU puno~ u! Pe^!l eA~q I 'Ja eu!ieJoqs LOSt le e^!l I puc Ilepe~ e^els s! euJeu ~ 'l!ounoo K1!O punolAl O.L 966 ~'g Jeqweoe(3 ~9gc_;cJ NIAI 'punolAI 'PEI poo,'w(.elAl punolhl to fq!O a liquor store. The Minnetonka Mist in Spring Park has an off sale liquor license and so does Haskell's in Excelsior. Both of these liquor stores are .located across busy roads from the lake. Many marinas have the ability to sell beer on the lake to their customers Rockvam Boatyard in Spring Park, Howard's Point and a few others have been licensed by their city to sell beer. Al& Alma's Supper Club has six or seven separate licenses to sell beer and wine to their patror~while aboard their charter boats enjoying Lake Minnetonka. There are also a few full service restaurants on the lake which include alcohol on their menu. I would offer the convenience of not having to cross a busy read or walk through a marina for my customers to purchase beer. ! have had a vast amount of alcohol awareness training in my years of bartending. I would appreciate your support and I feel that I meet the requirements for such a license. I believe the council will be making similar decisions granting such a license when Lost Lake is developed as I am sure if the business'are going to cater to boaters, one will probably want to sell beer or other alcoholic beverages. Sincerely, Steve Bedell By The Way Snack Shop CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 Mound Business: Mound Address: Applicant Name: , Applicant Dam of Birth: Citizen: Home Address: Company Name: Company Address: Company Officials: APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIOUOR Bus. Phone: J YES NO Driver's Lic. #: Social Security #: Home Phone: Co. Phone: -- -' City: Zip: (First) (Middle) (Last) (Date of Birth) 2. (First) (Middle) (Last) (Date of Birth) (First) (Middle) (Last) (Date of Birth) References: (List three - name and address of each) Indicate whether you sold $20,000 or more of nonintoxicating malt liquor or wine in previous year: Yes: Signature of Applicant No: Department: At~r0val/Denial (Submit memo if den/ed) Approved Denied ,ILk RESOLUTION//96-33 RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION//95-44 APPROVING A TRANSIENT M'ERCHANT LICENSE WITH CONDITIONS FOR A SEASONAL SNACK SHOP TRA.U.,ER AT 4801 SHORELINE DRIVE SKARP'S EAST LAWN, LOTS 1, 2, & 3, PID #13-117-24 44 0052 WHEREAS, Resolution #95-44 approved a Transient Merchant License for a seasonal snack shop trailer known as "By the Way Snack Shop," and; WI:rEREAS, a Transient Merchant License was obtained for the 1995 season by Steven Bedell, and; WI:I'EREAS, no complaints have been received over the past year with regards to the operation of the snack shop, and; WHEREAS, condition//9 within Resolution ~5-44 states, "The toilet facilities will be handicapped accessible and will be screened from the lake. These facilities shall not be within 50 feet of the lake, and will be removed from the parcel during the off-season." and; WHEREAS, Mr. Bedell has no employees other than himself, and the portable toilet on the property is provided as a convenience only, therefore, it is not required to be handicap accessible by the building code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve an amendment to Resolution i~)5-44, condition//9, as follows: "9. The toilet facilities will be u~..~: ..... .~ ...... :~.,~ ~_.~ ...:, u^ ........ vv ...................... screened from the lake. These facilities shall not be within 50 feet of the lake, and will be removed from the parcel during the off-season." The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Ahrens and seconded by Councilmember Jensen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Hanus and Jensen. Polston and Jessen were ~,,~,o~t and excused. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: None (l~-~yor - Attest: City Manager Resolution adopted: March 26, 1996 47 RESOLUTION #95-44 RF_~OLUTION TO APPROVE A TRANSIENT M'ERCHANT LICENSE WITH CONDITIONS FOR A SEASONAL SNACK SHOP TRAILER AT 4801 SHORELINE DRIVE SKARP'S EAST LAWN, LOTS 1, 2 & 3, PID #13-11%24 44 0052 WHEREAS, Steven Matthew Bedell, dCo/a By the Way Snack Shop, has applied for a Transient Merchant License to allow a seasonal snack shop trailer at 4801 Shoreline Drive, and; WHEREAS, City Code Section 485, Subd. 1., defines a Transient Merchant as, "Any person selling any merchandise, either as principal or agent, from a building or lot which he or she occupies as tenant at will, or under a lease for a shorter term than six (6) months, or from a railroad car, or a vehicle (if he or she does not travel about from house to house or from purchaser to purchaser) is a transient merchant." WHEREAS, this business is proposed to be water-oriented and will cater to boaters utilizing the adjacent Seton Channel and will offer service via a tie-up arrangement parallel to the channel, the two existing docks are proposed to be removed, and; ~S, the applicant proposes to sell: ice, cigarettes, ice cream, chewing tobacco, pre-packaged sandwiches, bottles and canned beverages (non-intoxicating), chips, and candy, sunglasses, suntan lotion, and; WHEREAS, the applicant also proposes to provide a public pay phone, portable bathrooms, and aesthetically pleasing garbage and recycling cans, and; WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the B-2 General Business Zoning District, and; WttEREAS, the City Council, at their meeting on April 11, 1995, directed City staff to prepare a Transient Merchant License with conditions to address issues and concerns relating to traffic problems or other types of problems .that may occur. NOW, TItEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve a Transient Merchant License for Steven Matthew Bedell, d/b/a By the Way Snack Shop, to operate a seasonal snack shop at 4801 Shoreline Drive, subject to the following conditions: 1. The snack shop shall be setback 19 feet from the water. 44oz April 25, 1995 3. The snack shop trailer to be currently licensed year-round. 4. The snack shop shall maintain a minimum 50 foot setback from the water during the off-season (October 16 through April 14). 5. The season will be April 15 through October 15. 6. If there are congestion problems in the channel, precipitating complaints, that this would be consideration for license revocation or denial of a license for the following year. 7. No picnic tables will be allowed on the site. 8. There must be garbage and recycling receptacles in an enclosure. 9. The toilet facilities will be handicapped accessible and will be screened from the lake. These facilities shall not be within 50 feet of the lake, and will be removed from the parcel during the off- season. 10. There shall be no signage for this business on the street side of the parcel and it will conform to all other applicable signage requirements in the code. 11. There will be a hold harmless provision, signed by the applicant and the applicant will provide proof of liability insurance with the City of Mound named as additional insured. 12. Hours of operation shall be restricted to, from sunrise to 1/2 hour after sunset, daily. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Hanus and seconded by Councilmember Ahrens. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Ahrens, Hanus and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Jensen and Jessen. Mayor CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 December 4, 1996 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER GREG SKINNER, PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT:-;;~~' NOVEMBER 1996 MONTHLY REPORT GENERAL We helped Linda with elections, Jim with the parks and Jon. We installed the new "Holiday" banners on every other pole along Commerce and Shoreline and ornaments on the other poles. We are short seventeen of the Christmas banners. After the first of the year Shirley Andersen will be talking with the business people for more donations to buy the remaining banners. Next year there should be enough banners for all poles. November was pretty busy with snow, ice and rain. There were catch basins plugged up. The department was out every day during the last week either pushing snow or water and sanding. We also mixed the salt/sand mix every day. We moved water when it rained, instead of waiting like we did in January to move ice. It worked out pretty well for us. The sidewalks along County Road 15 and 110 were done after street plowing. This sometimes required us to work some overtime to get them done Plowing the sidewalks appears to be the practice from now on. There is no other choice at this point. WATER DEPARTMENT We repaired a leaky gate valve located in front of city hall. There were a few main brakes, one was on Thanksgiving on County Road 44. There was a break on Bartlett Blvd. There was a fire hydrant to repair on Hillcrest that someone must have bumped it and broke the break away section, causing the hydrant to leak. printed on recycled paper Il ,It Il It i,I, ,11~ I ,Ilk A basement flooded on Fairview Lane during the first cold snap. We helped the people pump it out. The line froze, the valve busted and Bob crawled underneath, did some scuba diving to discover the valve was broke off, so we shut it off in the street. I am drafting a copper/lead news release to notify the public of what we have done so far and where we are at with the copper/lead testing. Thi~ i~ required bv the EPA. We are in good shape, there is nothing at this point to be concerned about. The EPA is requiring just an informational letter to the public. The letter should go in The Laker and the Contact. SEWER DEPARTMENT The Sewer Department finished the flushing and cleaning of the wet wells. They helped out on the main breaks, the valve repairs and the plowing. We did abandon an old lift station on Halstead Avenue. We removed the top and filled it up with sand. We will finish the restoration this spring. There is one more on Sulgrove and Tuxedo. We probably will not get to this one until spring. Is CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: December 5, 1996 City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff Jon Suthedand, Building Official NOVEMBER 1996 MONTHLY REPORT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY There were 26 building permits issued in November for a construction value of $812,440, and this brings year-to-date construction value to $10,445,429. This is more than $1 million ahead of the record pace of about 9 million year-to-date that was set in 1994. We issued 44 plumbing, mechanical, and miscellanous permits for a total of 70 permits this month, and 775 year-to-date, which is another record setting number! PLANNING & ZONING This last month the Planning Commission was busy processing four variance cases, one waiver of platting/variance request, and a preliminary plat/rezoning/vafiances for the proposed Maple Manors project on Three Points Blvd. In addition, the Planning Commission worked with the Assistant City Planner, Bruce Chamberlain, on the downtown redevelopment project. Staff is tracking the number of cases that are impacted by, or that do not require a variance since the ordinance for the streamlining of variances has been adopted. There were no cases able to be streamlined in the month of November, the year-to-date total is seven. Js:pj 4 4o , printed on recycled paper It Il Ii ;,I, ,,llJ, t i~ ,ILk I ..... itl City of Mound BUII,DING ACTIVITY REPORT Month: NOVEMBER Year: 1996 THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE RESIDENTIAL II #PERMITS I t UNITS I VALUATION II #UNITS I VALUATION ~'~ CONSTRUCTION SINGLE FAMILY OETACHEO 1 t 121,045 29 3,253,421 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED (CONDOS) 2 2 520,750 12 3,301,204 TWO FAMILY / DUPLEX MULTIPLE FAMILY (3 OR MORE UNITS) TRANSIENT HSG. (HOTELS / MOTELS) SUBTOTAL 3 3 641,795 41 6,554,625 COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) I 110 , 000 OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL [ 200,000 INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC / SCHOOLS SUBTOTAL 2 310 , 000 ADDITIONS/ALTERATIONS ADDITIONS TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING 2 89,600 29 771,347 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS I 2, 000 22 231,836 DECKS 3 10,140 61~ 169,906 SWIMMING POOLS I 400 REMODEL- MISC RESIDENTIAL 15 66,605 206 828,202 REMODEL- MULTIPLE DWELLINGS 3 l 14,503 SUBTOTAL 21 168, 345 322 2, 116, 194 ~-~ITIONS/ALTERATIONS COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) i 300 4 33,600 OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL i 2,000 7 230,510 INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC /SCHOOLS 2 1,200,500 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS SUBTOTAL 2 2 ~ 300 13 1 ~ 464 ~ 610 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS 8 NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS 6 TOTAL DEMOLITIONS 14 # PERMITS # UNITS VALUATION # UNITS VALUATION # PERMITS 41 10,445,429 TOTAL 26 812,440 *392 PERMIT COUNT I THISMONTH I YEAR'TO-DATE 'BUILDING 26 392 FENCES & RETAINING WALLS 3 30 S(GNS 2 11 PLUMBING 13 144 MECHANICAL 22 127 GRADING 0 2 s~w, STREET EXCAV.. F,RE. ETC. 4 69 TOTAL I 70 [ 775 LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Chief Len Harrell Monthly Report for November 1996 The police department responded to 993 calls for service during the month of November. There were 23 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 criminal sexual conduct, 1 robbery, 2 burglaries, 18 larcenies, and 1 vehicle theft. There were 80 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses included 2 child abuse/neglect, 1 forgery/NSF check, 1 weapons, 3 narcotics, 9 damage to property, 3 liquor law violations, 10 DUI's, 5 simple assaults, 13 domestics (3 with assaults), 8 harassment's, 9 juvenile status offenses, and 16 other offenses. The patrol division issued 201 adult citations and 12 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 64 tickets. Warnings were issued to 116 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 4 juveniles arrested for felonies. There were' 28 aduks and 9 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. There were an additional 9 warrant arrests. The department assisted in 18 vehicle accidents, 6 with injuries. There were 36 medical emergencies and 86 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 8 occasions in November and requested assistance 4 times. Property valued at $10,400 was stolen. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER 1996 II. INVESTIGATIONS The investigators worked on 4 child protection issues during the month of November, accounting for 44 hours of investigative time. Other cases under investigation included burglary, assault, terroristic threats, robbery, damage to property, forgery, theft by check, domestic abuse, sudden infant death, theft, harassment, violation of an order for protection, fleeing a police officer, hit and run, DUI, hazardous materials spill, and absenting. Formal complaints were issued in cases involving careless driving, forgery, providing alcohol to minors, under age consumption, gross misdemeanor driving after cancellation, and failure to transfer title. III. Personnel/Staffing The department used approximately 75 hours of overtime during the month of November. Officers used 52 hours of comp-time, 62 hours of vacation, 53 hours of sick time, and 30 holidays. Officers earned 37 hours of comp- time. Sgt. McKinley and officers of the department graduated another group through our 10 week citizen's academy in November. The course is still receiving excellent support. IV. ~ Sgt. Traux graduated from the Southern Police Institute Administrative Officer's Course with high honors and received recognition as a "Dean's Scholar". Several officers attended training in reference to harassment issues in the workplace and constitutional legal update. Officer Ewald attended the Triad Conference in Duluth and has been doing an excellent job working with our seniors. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER 1996 Vo COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS O~cers Packard and Clark addressed 64 animal complaints, 73 ordinance violations, and 166 miscellaneous calls for services. 2 citations were issued in November. The reserves donated 1,375 hours during the month of November. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 1996 CLEARED F. XC~PT- CLF. ARF, D BY ARI~STED Homicide Criminal Sexual Conduct Robbery Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Vehicle Theft Arson TOTAL PART II CRIMES Child Abuse/Neglect Forgery/NSF Checks 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 4 18 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 9 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 3 3 10 0 0 10 10 5 2 3 0 0 3 2 0 3 2 10 0 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 1 9 1 4 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 11 10 Criminal Damage to Property Weapons Narcotic Laws Liquor Laws DWI Simple Assault Domestic Assault Domestic (No Assault) Harassment Juvenile Status Offenses Public Peace Trespassing All Other Offenses TOTAL 80 6 11 32 28 9 PART II & PART IV Property Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Medicals Animal Complaints Mutual Aid Other General Investigations TOTAL 12 6 0 36 86 8 664 812 HCCP Inspections TOTAL 5 73 993 13 32 28 13 4-+/! MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT NOVEMBER 1996 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY Hazardous Citations Non-Hazardous Citations Hazardous Warnings Non-Hazardous Warnings Verbal Warnings Parking Citations DWI Over .10 Property Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Adult Felony Arrests Adult Misdemeanor Arrests Juvenile Felony Arrests Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests Part I Offenses Part II Offenses Medicals Animal Complaints Ordinance Violations Other Public Contacts THIS YEAR TO LAST YEAR MONTH DATE TO DATE 126 957 803 68 542 612 36 299 185 72 725 682 79 981 655 64 530 292 10 77 47 9 59 39 12 68 82 6 26 29 0 1 0 0 34 23 33 386 338 5 70 50 12 194 140 23 281 245 80 790 690 36 334 304 86 619 617 73 325 513 664 7,704 6,496 TOTAL Assists Follow-Ups HCCP Mutual Aid Given Mutal Aid Requested 1,494 15,002 12,842 77 779 824 23 358 338 5 41 29 8 165 193 4 92 148 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 1996 DWI More Than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired or No Plates Stop Arm Violations Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Code Enforcement Seat Belt MV/ATV Miscellaneous Tags TOTA~ 10 9 1 6 0 89 2 0 25 4 15 0 6 0 17 0 0 64 1 0 5 7 0 4 265 JUVENILE 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 1996 WARNINGS Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Window Tint Miscellaneous TOTAL WARRANT ARRESTS Felony Misdemeanor Adult 33 32 13 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 92 Juveniles 4 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 3 n ,I m It I, JIL i ,Irk Run: 3-Dec-96 11:27 PRO03 Primary ISNms on[y: ~o Oat~.Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 tJvJty codes: Att · operty Status: Alt Property Types: All Property Descs: All Brands: Att Models: Att Officers/Badges: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Property Report STOLEN/RECOVERED BY DATE REPORTED Prop Prop Inc no ISM Pr Prop Date Rptd Stolen Date Recovmd Quantity Act grand Tp Desc SN Stat Stolen Value Recov'd Value Code Model Page Off-1 Off-2 Assnd Assnd B Prop type Totals: 65 G Prop type Totals: 6/,5 0 Prop type Totals: 1,850 R Prop type Totals: 855 S Prop type Totals: 790 T Prop type Totals: 2,220 X '"' Prop type Totals: 1,295 Y Prop type Totals: 2,680 **** Report Totals: 10,400 1.000 2.000 1.000 2.000 2.000 4.000 2.000 8.000 22.000 Run= 3-Dec-9& 14:50 CFS08 Primary %SN"s on[y: No Date Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: AIL Activity Resutted= ALL Dispositions: Alt Officers/Badges: AIl Grids: AIl Patrol Areas: Days of the week: AIl MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Calls For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION [NC[DENTS 9000 SPEEDING 89 9001 J-SPEEDING S 9002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 2 9003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 1 9014 STOP SIGN 15 9015 J-STOP SIGN 1 9018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 6 9020 CARELESS/RECKLESS 1 9030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 1 9034 STOP ARM VIOLATION 4 9037 J-OBSTRUCTED VISION 1 9038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC 2 9040 NO SEATBELT 7 90~1 J-NO SEATBELT 1 9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 7 9140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS 57 9200 DAS/DAR/DAC 6 9201 J-DAS/DAR/DAC 1 9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED 25 9211 J-PLATES/NO-EXPIRED-IMPROPER 1 9220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF 17 9221 J-NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF 1 441p Page 1 ,El ,E~ ,il I~ ,E,, ,11~ i! ,ILl, Run: 3-Dec-96 14:50 CFS08 Primary ISN's onty: No Oat~ Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 'ange each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: AIl Activity Resulted: Dispositions: At[ Officers/Badges: AIl Grids: ALL Patrol Areas: Days of the week: AIl MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Ca[Is For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS 9240 CHANGE OF DOMICILE 8 9309 FOUND/RUNAWAY 1 9312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 2 9313 FOUND PROPERTY 3 9314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED 4 9315 UNCLAIME DESTROYED ANIMALS 4 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS 6 9450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS ? 9451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. 5 9465 SNO~OBILE ACCIDENTS 1 9566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 4 9710 MEDICAL/ASU 2 97'50 MEDICALS 31 9731 MEDICALS/DX 1 97'52 MEDICALS/CI 1 97'55 IOD INJURY 1 9800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED 5 9801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT 10 9802 PUBLIC ASSIST 1 ~ ALL HCCP CASES 5 9904 OPEN DOOR/ALARMS 4 9920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 5 Page Run: 3-Dec-96 14:50 CFS08 Primary %SN~s only: No Date Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Ho~ Received: ALL Activity ResuLted: ALL Dispositions: ALL Officers/Badges: Grids: ALL Patrol Areas: ALL Days of the week: ALL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors CaLLs For Service INCZDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT ATTEMPTS HRN-HANDS-ADLT-FAM ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ADULT-STR ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-CHLD-ACQ BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COfl THEFT BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK gEAP-UNK ACT FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER OESTROY-CHECK-PERSON D8500 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARiJUANA-POSSESSION DA540 ORUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK DCSO0 DRUGS-ORUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK E4700 ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DUI LIQUOR-UNK INJURY-UNK VEH J2501 TRAFF-GM-DUI LIQUOR-UNK INJ-UNK VEN 9930 HANDGUN APPLICATION 9~45 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 9980 WARRANTS 9990 MISC. VIOLATIONS 9992 MUTUAL AID/8100 9~93 MUTUAL AID/6500 9994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER A5351 A5352 A5353 A5354 A5355 A5505 B3494 B~990 C3111 2 2 8 1 5 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Page Run: 3-Dec-96 14:50 CFS08 Primary %SN's only: No Date Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 Ti~ ..... ange each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: ALt Activity ResuLted: AlL Dispositions: ALL Officers/Badges: Grids: Att Patrol Areas: ALL Days of the week: At[ MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Page Enfors CaLLs For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS J2EO0 J2R01 J3500 J3501 J3EO0 J3E01 J3T01 M3001 TRAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH TRAFF-GM-FAIL TO SUBMIT TO TEST-UNK INJ-MV TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR TRAFF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-MV UNDERAGE DRINKING AND DRIVING CSC 4-UNK ACT-OTH AUTH-UNK AGE-M dUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY N1310 DISTURBING PEACE-FE-STALKING-UNKNOI4N N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT R3196 ROBB-SIMPLE-HIGHWAY-NO WEAP-CHILD-STR TC021 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY TC029 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-OTN PROP TC159 THEFT-501-2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP T ...... ' THEFT-ZO1-5OO-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP TG023 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-RECORDS TG029 THEFT'LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-OTH PROP 1 1 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 8 9 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 Run: 3-Dec-96 14:50 CFS08 Primary ISN's on[y: No Date Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: Att Activity ResuLted: AlL Dispositions: ALl Officers/Badges: AL[ Grids: AlL Patrol Areas: ALt Oays of the week: ALL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors CaLLs For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS TG039 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-COIN MACH-OTH PROP TG059 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-YARDS-OTHR PROP TG060 THEFT'LESS 200-MS-MALLS'UNKNOWN 1 TG159 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER 1 U~498 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS 1 VA024 THEFT-VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-SNOW t~5190 WEAPONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR 1 X3250 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-VIOL ORD PROTECTION 1 X3360 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-MS-VIOL HARRASS REST ORDER 1 **** Report Totals: 4?5 Page Run: 3-Dec-96 11:08 OFF01 Primary ISN's on[y: No D~t~ Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 I ange each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Dispositions: Att Activity codes: Att Officers/Badges: Att Grids: Att MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page I ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL CODE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING A5351 A5352 A5353 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BO HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ADULT-STR A5154 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM A5:355 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BO HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ A5505 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-CHLD-ACQ B:3494 BURG :3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT r " BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UN[ ~EAP-UNK ACT C]111 FORGERY-MS-MAI[ ALTER DESTROY-CHEC[-PERSON 08500 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIdUANA-POSSESSION DA540 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UN[ E4700 ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DUI LIQUOR-UN[ INJURY-UNK VEH J2501 TRAFF-GM-DU! LIQUOR-UNK INJ-UNK VEH J2EO0 TRAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH J2R01 TRAFF-GM-FAIL TO SUBMIT TO TEST-UN[ INJ-MV J:3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR TRAFF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UN[ INJ-UNK VEH TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-MV UNDERAGE DRINKING AND DRIVING CSC 4-UN[ ACT-OTH AUTH-UNK AGE-M dUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED L7051 M:3001 J3501 J3EO0 J3E01 3 0 :3 0 2 1 0 3 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 I 1 100.0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 100.0 Run: ~-Dec-96 11:08 OFF01 Primary ISN's onJy: No Date Reported range: 10/26/96 - 11/25/96 Time range each day: 00:00 - 25:59 O~spos~t~ons: ALL Activity codes: ALL Officers/Badges: ALL Grids: ALL MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL COOE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEAREO M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 9 1 8 1 0 ] 4 7 87.5 N1310 DISTURB%NG PEACE-FE-STALKING-UNKNC~N I 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 N~190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 8 0 8 7 0 0 1 1 12.5 P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT 9 0 9 8 0 0 1 1 11.1 R3196 ROBB-SIMPLE-HIGHWAY-NO WEAP-CHILD-STR 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 TC021 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 1r TC029 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-OTH PROP 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 TC159 THEFT-501-2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP 3 0 ~ 3 0 0 0 0 0.0 TF159 THEFT-201-5OO-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP 3 0 3 ~ 0 0 0 0 0.0 TG02~ THEFT-LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-RECORDS 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 TG029 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-OTH PROP 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 TG039 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-COIN MACH-OTH PROP 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 TG059 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-YARDS-OTHR PROP 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 TG060 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MAILS-UNKNOWN 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 TG159 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 U~498 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 W~190 WEAPONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR I 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 X3250 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-VIOL ORD PROTECTION 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 X3360 CRIM AGNST ADH JUST-MS-VIOL HARRASS REST ORDER 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 **** Report Totals: 91 7 84 39 26 6 13 45 53.5 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER GINO BUSlNARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR NOVEMBER FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT Investment Activity Bought: Money Market 4M 2,068 Money Market Smith Barney 16 Money Market First Bank 100,672 Matured: Money Market First Bank (165,000) CP Smith Barney 5.349% (271,646) Insurance for 1997 - The City Manager and I are working with the City insurance agent to update the data necessary for the 1997 insurance package. The proposal will be submitted to the City Council on the second meeting in January. Overall the plan will be similar to this year's. The rates should be a little lower but the coverage about the same with some improvements. The City will receive a dividend again this year. The amount should be in the area of $20,000. Cities 1997 Legislative Policies - On November 22nd the City Manager and I attended the League of Minnesota Cities Policy Adoption Conference. It was well attended and many topics were discussed. We had the opportunity to view a model of a typical right of way found under the city streets. Given the direction that telecommunication is taking, city officials were made aware of the necessity to play an active role in influencing the legislative outcome of the Right of Way issue. At the end of the conference the 1997 legislative policies were approved with some minor changes. If you have an interest in getting a copy of the cities' platform for the 1997 legislative session, please let us know. CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 December 4, 1996 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY ~ER NOVEMBER 1996 MONTHLY REPORT ~// PARKS The weather conditions were good at the end of November to begin the ice rinks. There was enough snow fall to build berms and the temperatures dropped enough to allow flooding. We did have a few warm days that did not allow for ice making, but with the cold weather beginning in December, it looks good for the rinks to be open for Christmas vacation. CEMETERY The vacant lots were marked for winter burials so these locations can easily be identified with snow cover. TREE REMOVAL There were no trees removed in November. 1s printed on recycled paper CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 December 4, 1996 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER NOVEMBER 1996 MONTHLY REPORT As I predicted at the end of last month's report, November did indeed turn in some very fine numbers. Gross sales for the month were $140,318. That is exactly $20,000 more than we did in November of 1995. For the first eleven months of the year, sales stand at $1,495,420. Compare that to the $1,374,816 that we did during the same time frame last year, and you will see that we are having another excellent year. Customers are also up by 2500. I am going to make this a very brief report. As I write this I am very ill. I have got the worst cold I have ever had. My head is clogged and I can't think. ls pr~nted on recycled paper City of Mound Monthly Report Utilities Month of: November 1996 12/06/96 Utility-96 Residential Commercial Total No. of Customers: Water Sewer Water Used: (in 1,000 gallons) 1,149 1,145 22,419 124 124 3,744 1,273 1,269 26,163 Billing: Water Sewer Recycle Total $33,387 $52,032 $5,194 $90,613 $5,411 $13,725 $106 $19,242 $38,798 $65,757 $5,300 $109,855 Payments: Water Sewer Recycle Total $36,353 $47,996 $4,475 $88,824 $4,952 $11,022 $86 $16,060 $41,305 $59,018 $4,561 $104,884 12/03/i996 12:B7 612--4724435 I, ,IL~ , I[I TOM REESE PAGE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ~00 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 1~0 * WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 5..~391 · T~LEPHONF 612/473-7033 G. Alan Will~ult. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IO~IID MEMIEFIS Oouglas E. Babcock Chair, Tonka Bay Tom Reese Vice C~alr. Mouod Joseph Zwek ~ec~etaty, Greenwood Robert Rascop Tmasurlr, Shorewoo~ Kent Dahlen Mlnnelo~ka Beacl~ Bari Fo~zer Grelchen M~lich Mlnnetonk& Duane Markul Wayzal& Cr&i~ Moiiel Victoria Cmi~ Nelson S~'ir~ Park Eugene Pl~iyka MinnI~sii Excelsior Herb J, Sui~h Wo(xliand TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: DECEMBER :3, 1996 FROM: TOM REF~E, LMCD REPRP-,SENTATIVE $ OBJECT: NOVEMBER R~R'I' - LMCD 1.0 General Items. l.l The move to the Freshwater Foundation Building was completed December 1st. The new phone number is 471-9588. The new offices are excellent for the needs, The proximity to the Minnehaha Watershed right next door should be a plus 11 th, 1.2 The remaining 1996 Board meeting will be held on December 2.0 Exotic Species Task Force. 2.1 A pre-bid teleconference meeting with interested bidders for a potential new harvester was held November 13th. Bids are due December I Sth. 2.2 Work continues on the drafting of a much more strict ordinance providing for ways to control of exotics that could arrive on trailered watercraft coming here to participate in permitted events and contests. The Water Patrol is cooperating fully. 3.0 Water Structures 3. ! The Hawks boathouse case has gone to criminal court. He and I have been in frequent comunication seeking to find some agreeable accomodation between the three partics. 4,0 Lake Use, 4.1 No significant activity. $.0 Mound Specific Items 5.1 In order to be consistent with what wc have learned from the Minnetonka Beach experience, it appears that Mound will have to license and pay for WSU's somewhat in excess of the immediate needs, to keep ~m havin~iccnse frequently. Jim Facker is aware. Mound Representative - LMCD fc. Al Willcutt, Doug Babcock. RECEIVED LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ITEM 4.A Save the Lake Advisory Committee Minutes 5:00 P.M. Thursday, November 7, 1996 LMCD Offices, Suite #160, Norwest Bank, Wayzata Those present: Chair Craig Mollet, LMCD; Robert Pillsbury, Gretchen Maglich, Al Willcutt, Executive Director LMCD Chair Craig Mollet brought the meeting to order at 5:15 P.M. The minutes of the September 12, 1996 meeting were approved with a motion by Pillsburry. The slide show concerning public relations efforts was not given as planned due to a malfunction with the projector and was rescheduled for the following meeting. Pillsbury commented on this years Save the Lake solicitation letter process, stating that the outcome to date has been disappointing. It is believed that the inclusion of additional enclosures in the last mailing drew attention away from the actual letter. This idea will be suspended for the next mailing to see if there is a correlation. Craig and Al will work on this matter with final mailing scheduled for after Thanksgiving with final mailing approval to be given by Pillsbury. Mollet stated that thought should be given to contacting potential corporate and commercial contributors as prospects for the upcoming mailings. Pillsbury will review the mailing and contribution lists for revision and updating. Staff is in the process of printing winter rules and it was generally agreed that staff will once again be responsible for the placement of winter rules at public accesses around the lake and provide the Sheriff's Water Patrol with the quantity necessary for their needs.. The new printing will be accomplished on weather resistant paper for exterior use. The idea of developing a "Broadcast Fax" which would make it possible to access the local media with an E-mail type "General Broadcast" is being taken up with our computer consultant; Geek Technology Inc. The slide show, prepared by Laura Smith will be viewed at the next regular meeting. Stuart Frick has requested to remain involved with the annual Winter Ice Cleanup event. -2- A membership drive is in order to respond to two recent vacancies on the STL committee. Willcutt will contact Bob Rascop and Pillsbury will contact Jim Grathwol. The next meeting will be held February 6, 1996 at 5:00 PM. There was no old business or new business and the meeting was adjourned by Ma~lich at 6:45 P. M. Respectfully submitted, G. Alan Willcutt Executive Director RECEIVED DEC_, - 9 1996 LAKE M1NNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING 7:00 P.M., Wednesday, November 13, 1996 Tonka Bay City Hall Itl D AFT CALL TO ORDER Chair Babcock called the meeting to order at 7:16 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Gretchen Maglich, Minneton'ka; .Gene Partyka, Minnetrista; Tom Reese, Mound; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Paul Stark, Excelsior; Douglas Babcock, Tonka Bay; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Kent Dahlen, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland. Also present: G. Alan Willcutt, Executive Director; Charle~ LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Gregory Nybeck, Administrative Technici,'m. Members absent: Duane Markus, Wayzata; Craig Mollet, Victoria; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Joe Zwak, Greenwood. Orono has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no chair announcements. READING OF THE MINUTES Reese moved, Partyka seconded to approve the minutes of the 10/23/96 Regular Board meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments from persons in attendance on subjects not on the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA Partyka moved, Reese seconded to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted. Motion carded unanimously (Approved consent agenda item: 3A, Minutes of the 11/8/96 EWM meeting). WATER STRUCTURES A. City of Mhmetonka Beach, Discussion on Public Hearing for Variance from LMCD Code at three different dock sites. Babcock asked for an overview from staff on the variance requests. Nybeck stated the City of Minnetonka Beach has evaluated the 21 dock sites, other than dock site #11 adjacent to Mr. Goodman, in Minnetonka Beach to verify compliance with LMCD Code. He noted the city has determined that 18 of the 21 dock sites are in compliance with LMCD Code and the city has made application for variance from LMCD Code at the other three sites. He stated the first variance request is for a 80' long singular dock on Dock Site #1 in Crystal Bay that stores 4 BSU's with an approximated 14' of side setbacks. He stated LMCD Code would allow for a maximum dock length of 60' at this site. He stated the second variance I.~ke Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 2 request is for two 88' long docks at Dock Sites #8 & 9 on Lower Lake North that would store 4 BSU's at each .dock. He noted both a side setback and dock length variance were published by staff. He stated the third variance is at Dock Site #i0 on Lower Lake North consisting of 6 BSU's, four which open lakeward and two that open towards the side setbacks. He noted staff published a dock length, side setback, and an adjusted dock use area variance at this site. Babcock asked LeFevere for his opinion on whether one variance application could suffice for variance requests at three separate sites? LeFevere stated given the physical location of the docks, it would appear to make the most sense to have three separate applications. He added staff properly published public hearing notice to allow for consideration by the Board. He stated the only justification to allow for separate variance requests on one variance application is that the sites are on one multiple dOCk license. Reese stated he believed that separate variance applications should be required for each site. Partyka stated he believed each site should be reviewed separately. Babcock concurred. LeFevere stated separate Variance Orders would be prepared, if approved. He added it could be feasible to allo~v one application for three separate variances provided the applicant agrees to pay legal, administrative, and other expenses above what has been received. Nybeck noted the applicant agrees to this condition on the variance application. Mayor Brace Palmer, Minnetonka Beach, noted the city has been working on I ,I Lake Minnetonka Cmtservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 3 docking issues in the city for some time. He stated the dock ordinance has been cleaned up and modified and that city staff is working with LMCD staff to properly document what has been approved. He noted the city has talked to the abutting property owners at the three proposed variance dock sites and they have expressed little concern. Dock Site #1' Reese stated if a low water problem exists now, he believed a variance approval would not solve this problem. Frank Zelley stated water depths at 80' of dock length, not 60', in this location would be sufficient. JoEllen Hurr stated the water depths on the proposed site plans have been adjusted to the 929.4 lake elevation. LeFevere stated the property lines are not shown on the proposed site plan and he believed it would be beneficial to know exactly where the docks would be placed in the authorized dock use area with identified side setbacks. Hurr stated a survey providing this detail could be provided. MOTION: Reese moved, Partyka seconded to direct attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length variance of 80' at Dock Site #1, subject to ,the extended lot lines documented on the proposed site plan with side setbacks identified. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 4 Dock Sites #8 & 9: Babcock stated the second variance request is on a 50' wide firelane with two separate docks. He noted eight BSU's are proposed that have been historically stored on this site. He stated'.be believed both a dock length and a side setback variance would be required for approval of the proposed site plan. Hurt clarified that the proposed site plan would allow for a 5' side setback from the Johnson property to the north and it would encroach approximately 3' on the Kroll property to the south. Mayor Bruce Palmer concurred that if the docks were approved as they have been place historically, there would be an approximated encroachment of 3' on the Kroll property. Michelle Kroll stated she and her husband would consider the encroachment of the municipal provided they could adjust their dock use are to the south. She noted the neighbor to their south does not appear willing to do this. Mayor Palmer stated the city believes they have the ability to require the neighbors to the south of the Krolls', the Ellards', to allow the Krolls' dock to be closer to their dock use Babcock expressed concem in approving variance requests that encroach on the neighbors dock use area. Mayor Palmer stated the city has reviewed two years of records on the vacation of Lafayette Road. He noted in these records, the city believes it was clearly intended to maintain the historical location of the docks in sites #8 and 9, and technically require the residents of Minnetonka Beach to approve placement of residential docks along the vacated street. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 5 Babcock stated if the variance is to be considered, he believed all of thc structure needs to be properly illustrated on the site plan and contained within the authorized dock use area. Mayor Palmer clarified that a dock length variance has been applied for, not a side setback. He noted the city was not prepared to discuss encroachment concerns on the Kroll property. He encouraged the Board to consider the dock length request only. Nelson asked for clarification from the city on how the vacation resolution allows the city to encroach on abutting neighbors property. Hurr and Palmer pointed out it explains in the vacation resolution that the city docks could continue to exist as they have been placed historically. Hurr noted the side setback details would be provided when application is made for new multiple dock license. Babcock stated a dock length variance in itself would not be sufficient for the proposed dock structure since it would not comply with LMCD side setback requirements. Hurr questioned whether side setback requirements would apply to the Kroll property south of dock//9 because of the vacation resolution. LeFevere stated the question appears to be whether the city has greater use of the shoreline beyond the 50' firelane. He added the vacation resolution indicates the vacated street shall be maintained by the adjacent property with exclusive use thereof. He noted the construction of structures on the vacated property may net be done without the consent of the other owners of the rest of the plat. He stated this provides the other owners of the plat some control of dockage rights on the vacated street. He added he talked to Robert Mitchell, City Attorney for Minneton'ka Beach, about this and he indicated that it is Mitchells' opinion that the city has exclusive dockage rights along the vacated street. LeFevere concluded a dock length variance may not be needed if this is the case. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 6 Mayor Palmer stated LeFevere's interpretation is correct; however, it is the cities intent to only put municipal docks out as they have been historically. LeFevere stated he believed there is a need to differentiate between property fights conferred by the street vacation and what LMCD Code says. He added unless the city has the exclusive dockage rights of the street vacated, the city is required to comply with LMCD Code. He added if the city maintains they have exclusive dockage rights to encroach on the Kroll property to the south, a minimum side setback of 10' should apply rather than 5'. Babcock stated he believed the ownership and control issues related to the vacation resolution need to be resolved before this item can be resolved. LeFevere stated if the City does have exclusive dockage rights on the vacated street, the Board may want the city to conform to the 1:50' boat rule. Kroll stated it would be beneficial to her if the city would specifically define what the cities legal rights are. Hurr stated the city would make application for a new multiple dock license at this dock site within the parameters defined by the LMCD. She added if this is a 40' X 88' dock use area, the city will work within that. MOTION: Dahlen moved, Suerth seconded to direct attorney to prepare 'Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length variance with a 40' x 88' dock use area starting from the southemmost edge of the dock use area. VOTE: Ayes 6; Nays (3; Rascop, Party'ka, Babcock); Motion carried. Lake Minnelonka Cottservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 7 Dock Site #10: Babcock stated this dock site is at he other end of the vacated street discussed in detail in the previous variance request. He outlined the proposed site plan noting the setback appeared to be maintained from the southern property but it encroaches on the property to the north. Hurr stated she talked to the neighbor to the north, Ms. Gordon, and reported that Ms. Gordon expressed little concern on the encroachment if the docks are placed as they have been historically. Babcock asked city officials if they are asking for a dock length variance similar to the request on dock sites #8 and 9? Mayor Palmer stated they are requesting what has been placed historically. Board members concurred that more documentation needs to be provided to make a decision on this variance request. This included variances requested with associated hardships, the location of extended lot lines, location of the proposed dock structure, and the cities stance on dockage rights associated with the street vacation. Hurr noted a survey of this site providing this detail would be provided at the 12/11/96 Board meeting. MOTION: Reese moved, Partyka seconded to table this variance request to the 12/11/96 Board meeting. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Bo Robert and Susan Mellett, Consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for Approval of Dock Length and Side Setback Variances, Plus an Adjusted Dock Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 8 MOTION: Rascop moved, Reese seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval of dock length and side setback variances, plus an adjusted dock use area. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Ce Additional Business Reese stated he had talked with Bil Hawks and he reported Mr. Hawks is interested in a compromise with the LMCD regarding the boathouse on Halsteds Bay. He recommended Hawks provide a compromise to the Board. Babcock stated the Board needs to hear what he is proposing before a decision is made. ® LAKE A. USE AND RECREATION Lanie Kubes, Proposal to Board to Consider Amending LMCD Code Section 3.01,. Subd. 18 that Currently lh'ohibits Commercial Sales on the Lake. Lanie Kubes discussed a proposal to sell food, beverages and other items on the lake from a pontoon. She stated she had discussed this proposal with LMCD staff and they indicated current Code prohibits this type of activity. Babcock stated he believed the Board decided to prohibit such commercial activity on Lake Minnetonka because there were concerns with boat to boat safety and litter. He added there is just a general concern with commercial activity on water versus land. Kubes stated she believed this activity would be quite a service tbr the people who use the lake. She stated they are not interested in having anyone come onto their Lake Minnetonka Com;ervation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 9 boat which should address Water Patrol safety concems. She noted they would be willing to do anything to keep the area clean and that days of operation are tentatively set from Wednesdays thru Sundays, and on holidays. She stated food choices would be simple with hot food not served. Reese asked Kubes if they would be willing to do this within the 150' shore area zone or within a closed throttle area. Kubes stated they would prefer to be able to operate anywhere on the lake. Jabbour suggested the LMCD needs to consider the member cities when considering a Code amendment on such activity. He recommended notifying the cities such a business may exist and provide them the opportunity to license or permit them. He added it may be mandated to be licensed by the State Health Department. He questioned whether such commercial activities should be allowed on the lake when some member cities are more restrictive on allowing similar operations on land. He used the example that the City of Orono allows commercial activity only in the Navarre area and on Highway 12. Nelson asked for clarification on what is the LMCD's and members cities jurisdiction on this. LeFevere discussed the LMCD's unique position to govern surface area activities through Code delegated by the enabling act. He added that generally cities do not have the authority to regulate surface use on the lake unless the water is totally located within the city and they have received DNR approval. Board members discussed the idea of permitting such activity. Nybeck stated if this is something the Board wants to permit, they need to consider Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 10 the proliferation of requests for permits annually. Reese recommended a letter be drafted by the Chair and sent to the member cities outlining what Code amendment is being considered and encourage their feedback on this. Maglich stated she would prefer that such commercial activity be restricted to land. Be Update on 10/29/96 meeting - 1997 Joint and Cooperative Agreement with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol. Willcutt reported a meeting was held with representatives of Hennepin County and Board members regarding the 1997 Joint and Cooperative Agreement. He noted the main focus of the meeting was the special event permitting process and how it relates to the boat washdown program. He stated he and Sgt. Schilling were drafting a letter to special event coordinators outlining concerns, boat washing requirements, and that a plan of action will be required for each special event. Babcock noted the Sheriffs Water Patrol appeared more cooperative in requiring that a plan of action be a requirement of each special event permit application. He added a permit will not be issued until a boat washdown plan has been submitted to the LMCD. Ce Additional Business There was no additional business e EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL/EXOTICS TASKFORCE B. 11/8/96 Meeting Report Suerth reported on the following: * DNR Report- $24,500 has been provided annually in the past few years to assist the in the management of milfoil. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 11 * New Harvester- a recommendation on the RFP for the new harvester should be ready at the 12/11/96 Board meeting. * Web Page- Chip Welling would check to see if any funds are available to assist in the maintenance of the web page. * Harvester- discussions have taken place on the idea of sharing a harvester with the DNP. Additional Business There was no additional business. e SAVE THE LAKE *A. Minutes of the 11/7/96 Meeting These Minutes were tabled to the 12/11/96 Board meeting. Be 11/7/96 Meeting Report This was tabled to the 12/11/96 Board meeting. Ce Additional Business There was no additional business. ADMINISTRATION A. Comnfittee Report on LMCD Office Relocation Status. Willcutt reviewed the proposed floor plan and reported a moving date is scheduled for 11/25/96 Be Additional Business Reese asked for Board input on providing draft minutes on the web page. The Board agreed they can be provided on the web and marked "draft". Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 12 ® FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers for payment Rascop reviewed the audit of vouchers for payment. Board members discussed the League of Minnesota Cities membership fee ot' $880. The Board directed Willcutt to research what is provided in this feek~.~ and report back. MOTION: Rascop moved, Partyka seconded to approve the audit of vouchers for payment. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Additional Business He stated RFP's for an auditor have been sent out and are pending. e EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Willcutt reported Specialty Bookkeeping will not be providing bookkeeping services sometime after the first of the year. He noted he would be checking into a new bookkeeper. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS Jabbour encouraged Board members to visit the new DNR public access on Maxwell Bay in Orono. Babcock commended the efforts of the City of Orono and Jabbour. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting November 13, 1996 Page 13 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Babcock adjourned the meeting at 10:20 p.m. Douglas Babcock, Chair Joseph Zwak, Secretary nl ,nd ~ Ii I, ,11~ i ,Irk CALL TO ORDER RECEIVEEI BEE: - l ,qt LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday December 11, 1996 Tonka Bay City Hall ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Babcock READING OF MINUTES- 11/13/96 Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent Agenda items identified by "*" will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests a discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. 1. WATER STRUCTURES A. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length variance at dock site #1 on the Lake Road firelane on Crystal Bay; City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length variance at dock sites #8 & 9 on the Lafayette Road fire- lane on Lower Lake North; C. City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach, Discussion on dock length variance appli- cation on dock site #10 on the Cross Point Road firelane on Lower Lake North; D. Draft Protected Waters General Permit, Board review and consideration to make application for a DNR Protected Waters Permit; E. Additional Business; 2. LAKE USE & RECREATION EWM/EXOTICS TASKFORCE A. Ordinance Amendment, 1st reading of an ordinance relating to special events and the transportation of exotic species; adding new subdivisions 2 through 9 to LMCD Code 3.O9; B. Update on RFP for new harvester; C. Additional Business; SAVE THE LAKE *A. Minutes of the 11/7/96 meeting; B. 11/7/96 meeting report; C. Additional Business; ADMINISTRATION A. Appointments for 1997; * Auditor Selection * Legal Counsel * Prosecuting Attorney * Bookkeeper * Official Newspaper * Bank depository resolution for fiscal year 1997 B. LMCD Office Relocation Update; C. Additional Business; 6. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers for payment; * 11/16/96 - 11/30/96 * 12/1/96 - 12/15/96 B. November financial summary and balance sheet; C. Additional Business; 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT DEC-I~-gE~ 13, 12 1=ROM,KENNEDY & GRAVEN l, ~LL ID,G1233?9318 PAGE 2/11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCEAMENDING SECTION 510:00, SUBD. 3; SECTION 510:10, SUBD. 2; SECTION 510:Z5, SUBD. 3; SECTION 510:20, STJ-~DS. 1, 3, 4, 6, AND 8; SECTION 510:25, SUBDS. 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8; AND SECTION 510:40, SUBDS. 6 AND 8; OF THE CITY CODE AND ADDING SECTION 510:31, SUBDS. 1 AND 2; AND SECTION 510:40, SUBD. 6A TO THE CITY CODE, ALL RELATING TO FEES Subd. 3 The City of Mound Does Ordain: Section 510:00, Subd. 3 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Code Sectiog TvT_e of License Conditions and Term~ ~moun~. 405:00 Arcades Annual 1cc.cC Per Machine Z00.00 * Subd. ~- 2 Section 510:10, Subd. 2 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Code Conditions Section Tvoe of License and Terms. ~moun~ 440:10 Cigarette Sales Annual 12_24.00 Monthly ~.00 Cigarette Sales r vendinq n~ 5o.o0 Sub~. No. 3 section 510:15, Subd. 3. of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Code Conditions ~ _Tvp_e of License and Terms Amount 488:05 Tree Surgeon Annual DEC-1B-gS 13,12 FROM,KENNEDY & GRAVEN ID,S12337931~ PAGE 3/11 Section 510:20, subd. 1 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Subd. Code I 410:10 T~oe of License Amusement Devices Conditions Annual, per machine $ ZL.00 Section 510:20, Subds. 3 and 4 of the City Code are amended to read as follows: · Conditions Subd. Code ~. ~ __T~oe of License ~ ~ 3 45S:05 Dog & 455:05 Duplicate tag Two year, neutered or spayed, wit~ Two year, unneutered or unspayed · &15_. O0 eeZ. ., oo el Subd. ~To- subd. Section 510:20, Subd. 6 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Code 455:05 Tv~e of License Late applications Conditions On or before May 10 add Section 510:20, subd. follows: Code ~ TvDe of License ~ Restaurants, Cafes 8 of the City Code is amended to read as Conditions Annual _0.00 Subd. Soo=ion ~10~2~, Sub,s. 4, 5, amended I~o read as follows: Code Section 19;D~ of. License 800:15 On-Sale Liquor (Cla~ A) 800;1S O~-Sale Wine 800:!5 Club 800:15 Special ~unday (Class B) 810:15 Beer %, 7, add 8 of :he City Code arm Conditions Annual 4,~00.00 Initial Ap- plication 500.00 'Der plican: Additional Investigation S00.00 Annual &~00.00 Annual 1~0.00 ~n=al ~00.00 Annual 0n-Sale Annual Off-Sale Tem~rar~ Daily Permi~ ~00.00 ~..~.~..00 ~.00 plus day after third day Section $10:31, Sub~. 1 and 2 are adde= =o =he City Code .a~d shall read as follows: S.Ubd. Code Conditions 8ec.~.igA Ty~e.9~ ~ee and Terz'~e R~t~rn Check ~er C~eck Search/Special Z 20.00. Section 510:40, Subd. 6 of the City Code is amendcd to read as follows = Su~d. Code No..__=. ~ec=ig.~ Type of L{c~ms~. Conditions mA~%_Tm=ma ~mount P~r A~lication ~2.5.00 secr.-lon .~LO:&O, Su~bclm. ~ and. $ o* t~he ¢i~:y Code are amend~cl to r~ad a~ £ollow~, gubd.. ¢ou~i=ions Per Applicatlo~ ~0.00 2~0.00 Sub~. No. 10 Section ~10:40. Sub~. 10 of the Ci~ Code i~ amendea ~o read as follows: Conditions T~= of 5icense Zoning Amendment per Application 25~0.00 ' Adop~c~by City Council Publishe~ in o££ic~al N=wspapcr Mayor Subd. op~ ~ANCE NO. AN OF2DiNANCE AMENDING, .~ECTION 520:00, SURDS. la{3), 1.b, lb, 2 AND 10 OF THE C£TY CODE R~/LATING TO FEES AND D~,L~TING SECTION 520: SURDS. ? AND 8 DU~ TO DI/PLICAT'~ON The City of Mound Docs Ordain: rea~ a~ 300:20 Building Permit,Fire Suppression ~ermit & Inspection Fees. Permit ~ocs for all building permits and fire suppres~ion permits, and other inspectionfe~, ~hall be charged according to the 19~9~ Uniform Building Code Section~ ~''~' ~=. ~-=..---'-~ ~' ~' ."-=---c"= ....... ~uL.-==-'" ~ ' ..~ =¢--:~-...-- ~-~."~ 107 "TABLE· 1-A ~ B_UILD!N~ ~ERMIT FE~$." Sectto~ $00:20, Subd. lb of the City Co~c i~ amende~ to read as follows: Conditions ~ecc~on _Type of License and Ter~ A~pYnt 311:00 ~__Air Cond.itioning_& ventilat~_o~ Definition: All terms used in this Subdivision b shall ~e interpreted as deflned in =he Minnesota Hcatin~, Ventilating, Air Conditioning an~ Refri~era=ion Code. ~ees.RD_=uired:. 'The Muildin~ Code Department, before issuing any permit for the construction, installation, al=station, or rmpair of any furnacc, boiler, heating or pow~.r pl~u~t or system, or any device or equipment connected therewith, or ~or any other device connected to, or to be connected with, any chimney or stack, or for =he con~tructJ, on, installation, alteration, addition or repair of any cooling piping and equipment, or of amy air conditioning system or ventilation system, or sheet mctel duct work or eguipm~n~ thurewith, or o£ any refrigeration plant or equipment, shall require the payment by the applicant for such permit, fee or fees in the amount hcrein required. Contract Price~ (in¢ludin~ labor and mat=rials) minimum ~.~,1~ of contract The cost of. in.tallations, alterations, addicion~, or repair= as U~e~ in thi~ SuD~ivision b ~11 ~c]u~ ~11 l~or a~ material lup91ied by the c~ractor. In addition, i= m~ll include dj.J, ~a=~rials supplie~ ~ o=her ~ource~ wb~n these materials arc noilly supplied ~ the Section s20:O0, Subd. lh of th~ City code im amended =o read follows: S~b~. Cod~ Co~d].tions 1.h. M8 473.121, subd. 24 ~=~__~A~I~ilitv. ASAC) Char=s, In accord,,~ce w{th. regula:ion~ of the ~tropulitan~a~ -" ....." ~ounc{1 Bnv~ronmen~~an~ :he City of Mound, Building Code Departmenn shall collect a Sewer Availability (SAC) Charge on Building Permits i~u*d for each building or s~ructure to b e constructed or connec=ed to the Metropolitan Diaposal SyS:em. SUbd. ~eccion 520:00, gubd. 3 o£ che C~Cy Code is ~mended Co xead as Code Co:di:ions Section ~_Typ_e O~ Licens. e ~ 910:00 Plumbing ~ermiC Fees ]~: A plumbing fixuur= shall bt taken to mean and include any sink, laundry tub, bathtub, wash basi~, 8rinki~ fountain, wa=er clo~e=, floor 8rai~, or an~ other plumbing ~evice arranged =o b~ corm~cte~ with the sower or portable water system, either ~ireculy or indirectly. Permit fee shall be $.~-~2__0.00, plus $8.00 per fixture an~ rough in only, sct~in~ fixture only, and £1xCur= withou~ waste connection (sill cock]. $5.00 per 100 fe,L of pipe or fraction thereof. $3.00 per 100 ~ee~ of repair or fraction thcreof. &. $~&29.00 for out.$~de sewer &nd/or water in~D. ections. S. $~20.00 ~or private water well inspection. The permit fee fo~' the installation of gab piping for use in connection with = plumbing ~ys=em ~hall be as set out in the f~c table contained in Subdivision c, Gas Piping, above. Section 520:00, Subda. 7 and 8 of the City Code are ~lete~ duc to duplica:ion~ Subd. Code ~o. S~cti~n Conditiona · ,Platting Per ~ollows: Subd. Code 10. 330:?S Pla~s & Subd lvision* Conditions preliminary Pla= ~2~0.00 Final ~lat Plu~ $~/~.00 per lot over 2 lo=l Minor Subdivision (Lot Split) fr~y_~00 Escrow ~posi= 1,000.00 NOTE: £gcro~ fees will be assessed for all ®.~=ra Qxpen~e$ ~o city. ~a¥or ~ity clerk ~doptedb~Ci~y Council Published in O~fi¢4al Newspaper D£C-10-SS 13:1S FROM:K£NN~D¥ & GRAV£N i, ,ttk i,,, ID=S12337~310 PAG£ 18/11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 540:00, SUBD. 3 AND SUBD. 13, SUBSECTIONS a AND b OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO FEES The City of Mound Does Ordain: Section 540:00, Subd. 3 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Code Section Type of Li.cense Conditions and .Terms Amount 3 600:45 Treatment Rates ~ewer Rates Residential Ouarterly Cbarqe Quarterly sewer charge For 10,000 gallons or less $~0.~537.25 Minimum Ail over 10,000 gallons, per 1,000 gallons ~-~9=32.35 Minimum Quarterly Bill ~C.~37.25 NOTE: The above minimum applies to each single family dwelling or apartment which is in accord- ance withexisting sewer department policy. Commercial, Including Large Monthly Char~es Apartments Monthly Sewer Charges (Large Users) For 3,000 gallons or less All over 3,000 gallons, per 1,000 gallons NOTE: Minimum Monthly Bill per apartment $I~.D~12.50 Minimum 1T.2012.50 Single PamilyDwelling - The sewer rate shall be based on the actual usage or the first quarter actual water usage, whichever is less. Two-Family Usage and Multiple Dwelling Usage - Is computed on the same basis as a single dwelling, except that the total quarterly charges on all such properties shall not.be less than the number of units multiplied by the $1~.~012.50 per month, minimum charge per unit. Water used but not placed into the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered. DEC-18-SG 13:15 FROM:KENNEDY & GRAVEN ID:S1233?8318 PAGE 11/11 Dwellings Connected to Sewer but not Connected to Municipal Water - Shall pay a quarterly rate of $3C.?0%4.30. If such users wish to pay sewer rates based on gallons of water used, they can purchase a water meter from the City and have their own plumber install the meter on their well. Commercial and Industrial - The quarterly sewer rate is based on the actual amount of water used each month on the same cost scale as residential (see above). Water used but not placed into the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered. Availability Charge - All dwellings not connected to the sanitary sewer must pay an availability charge of $~8~7.25 per quarter whether occupied or vacant. Late Fee Penalty - For all bills not paid on or before the due date specified on the bill, a 10% late fee will be added. Section 540:00, Subd. 13, subsections a and b of the City Code are amended to read as follows: Subd. Code T%zpe 9f License Conditions ~ AmQunt 13 610:45 Water Gallonage Rates a. Service charge of $~-~2~/~per month, per account For all water consumed; $~--_~l.2Qper 1,000 gallons Mayor Attest: City Clerk Adopted by City Council Published in Official Newspaper