Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1997-11-18
AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY~ NOVEMBER 18, 1997, 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CItAMBERS *~: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETINO - PLEDGE OF AI.I.EGIANCE. PAOE APPROVE AGENDA. At this time items can be added to the Agenda that are not listed and/or items can be removed from the Consent Agenda and voted upon after the Consent Agenda has been approved. *3. CONSENT AGENDA; *A. APPROVE THE MINUTF_3 OF THE OCTOBER 28, 1997, REGULAR MEETING .................................. 3950-3959 *B. APPROVE THE MINUT~ OF THE OCTOBER 29, 1997, JOINT CITY COUNCH.,/WFfTONKA SCHOOL BOARD MEETING ...... 3960-3961 *C. CASE 9%$4; VARIANCE REOUEST; LOT SIZE, YARD AND HARDCOVER FOR AN ADDITION, THOMAS ALEXANDER, 4994 MANCHESTER ROAD, LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD, PID 24-117-24 42 0005 .................................. 3962-4009 *U. APPROVAL OF AN INTERIM ORDINANCE REGULATING TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION FACILITIF~ OF COMMERC~ WIRFJ..ESS TELECO~CATION SERVICES; ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM; AND DIRF. LrI'ING A STUDY BE CONDUCTED TI4ERF_ON ............................. 4010-4015 *E. APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST, SHERWOOD DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION, BUFFALO BITUMINOUS . . . 4016-4018 *F. APPROVAL OF PARTIAL PAYME~ REQUEST, AUDITOR'S ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - DEMOLITION TO JME CONSTRUCTION, MONTICELLO, MN ................... 4019-4022 3947 e *G. PAYMENT OF BILLS .................................. 4023-4042 REQ~T FROM THE CITY OF MINNETRISTA RE: PROPOSED CHANGES TO FIRE DISTRICt ~ TI-IE CITY OF ~TRISTA ............. 4043-4056 COMIV~NTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITW~ENS PRES~. INFQ~TION~CELL~OUS: A. Department Head Monthly Reports for October 1997 ................ 40574086 B. Planning Commission Minutes of November 10, 1997 ............... 4087-4092 C. Notice from Suburban Rate Authority (SRA) re: 612 Area Code Decision . . 4093-4094 Attached axe revised pages for the 1998 Budget per your request from the October 20, 1997 Committee of the Whole Meeting (COW). These revisions were developed based upon your direction and will be discussed at the December 11, 1997 Truth in Taxation Hearing ................ 4095-4102 ANNIJ~ CHRISTMAS PARTY, SUNDAY, DECEMBER 14, 1997, BEGINNING AT 5:30 P.M., AME~C~ LEGION. SEE ENCLOSED FLIER. NF. ED TO RSVP BY DECEMBER 9 TO JODI RAHN 4103 SECOND INFORMATIONAL lVlF~ETING ON THE PROPOSED RENOVATION OF THE WESTONKA COMMUNITY CENTER IS SCI-lg. DULED FOR WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 7:30 P.M., MOUND CITY HALL. THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1997, 6:30 P.M., HAS BEEN ~ANI~ELLED DUE TO MARK HANUS HAVING TO BE OUT OF TOWN ON BUSINESS. PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHAT A GOOD DATE WOULD BE TO RESCHEDULE THE SESSION. TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 6:30 P.M., AT THE CHRISTMAS TREE DOWNTOWN MOUND. I. REMINDER: HRA MEF~TING, 7 P.M., NOVEMBER 18, 1997, CITY HALL. NO CITY COUNCIL MF.~TING ON NOVF_2vlBER 25, 1997. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS IN DECEMBER ARE SCI4F. DUI.F.D FOR TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1997 AND TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1997. 3948 '1.2 *1.3 *1.4 Mound City Council Minutes - October 28, 1997 APPROVE THE MINUTF-3 OF THE OCTOBER 20. 1997. JOINT MOUND & MINNETRISTA CITY COUNCH3' AND WESTONKA SCHOOL BOARD MEETING. MOTION AhrellSs Weycker, nnnnimously. APPROVE THE MINUTF_~ OF THE OCTOBER 23.1997. JOINT MOUND & MINNETRI~TA CITY COI. JNCII~' AND WF_~TONKA SCHOOL BOARD MEETING. MOTION Ahreus, Weycker, unanimously. CASE 97-48: VARIANCE REQUEST FQR FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR AN ADDITION, GAYLE LEA PERSON, 19~ LAKESIDE LANE. LOT 9. BLOCK 11. SHADYWOOD POINT, PID 18-117-23 23 0055. RESOLUTION/D7-111 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR AN ADDmON AT 1933 LAKESIDE LANE, LOT 9, BLOCK 11, SHADYWOOD POINT, PID 18-117-23 23 0055, P & Z CASE g97-48 '.reus, Weycker, unanimously. -49: VARIANCE REQ~T FOR LOT SIZE TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDmON, RUBINEH, 2213 CHATEAU LANE, LOT 17, BLOCK 1, CREVIER'$ ON OF PART OF LOT ~16, LAFAYETTE PARK. PID 13-117-24 43 0058. N tn)7-112 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A LOT SIZE VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDmON AT 2213 CHATEAU LANE, LOT 17, BLOCK 1, CREVIER'S SUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT 36 LAFAYETTE PARK, PID 13-117-24 43 0058, P & Z CASE g97-49 aously. FOR MINQR ~UBDIVISION, ANDY GEARHART, 2075 47, 48 AND 49 MOUND SHORES. PID 14-117-24 42 0084. LUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION AT 2075 WIEW BLVD, LOTS 47, 48, AND 49, MOUND SHORES, [7-24 42 0084, P & Z CASE g97-50 *1.0 *1.1 Mound City Council Minutes - October 28, 1997 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 28, 1997 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, October 28, 1997, at 7:30 PM, in the Council Chambers at ~341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Mark Hanus, Liz Sensen and Leah Weycker. Also in attendance were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Sr., City Attorney John Dean, Building Official Jon Sutherland and City Clerk Fran Clark and the following interested citizens: Para Amidon, Gayle Person, Theresa Elveru, Dee & Brian Skalbeck, Mille Nedman, Matin Hegland, James Levens, Brad Erickson, Mike Palm, Andy Gearhart, Laurie Rubineh, Tom Lehmen, William Mc Master, Lee Dorholt, Rick Jorgensen, The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. *~2tgglg_dggl~: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or C3tizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. APPROVE AGENDA. At this time items can be added to the Agenda that are not listed and/or items can be removed from the Consent Agenda and voted upon after the Consent Agenda has been approved. Councilmember Weycker asked that Item *A., Minutes of the October 14, 1997, Rr be removed from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Hanus asked that Item E., Case g97-47 be removed from the C also stated he had two Add-On two items from the Planning Commission. CONSENT AGENDA; MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Weycker to approve the C above. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF ~ OCTOBER 20.1997, MEETING. MOTION Ahrens, Weycker, unanimously. '1.7 '1.8 *1.9 *1.10 Mound City Council Minutes - October 28. 1997 ~ VARIANCE FOR LOT SIZE AND FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION. BRIAN AND DEE SKALRECK. 5341 FRANKLIN ROAD. W-P/LOT 46 W-H1PPLE SHORES. PID 25-117-24 21 0115. RESOLUTION g97-114 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A LOT SIZE AND FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AT 5341 FRANKLIN ROAD, W-P/LOT 46, WHIPPLE SHORES, PID 25-117-24 21 0015, P & Z CASE ~)7-51 Ahreus, Weycker, unanimously. CASE 97-52: VARIANCE REQUF_~T FOR FRONT YARD AND SmEYARD TO CONSTRUCT THREE SEASON PORCH. BOB AND CATHY BERGEMANN. 3054 BRIGHTON BLVD.. LOTS 12 & 13 AND i5' VACATEn STREET. BLOCK 14. ARDEN, PID 24-117-24 44 0168 & 0169. RESOLUTION ~7-115 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A 3 SEASON PORCH AT 3054 BRIGHTON BLVD, PID 24-117-24 44 0168 & 0169, P & Z CASE ~97-52 Ahrens, Weycker, nnnnimously. CASE 97-53; MINOR SUBDIVISION. BALBOA CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. 5300 SHORELINE DRIVE, PID 13-117-24 34 0096 AND PID 13-117-24 34 0015. RESOLUTION ~97-116 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION AT 5300 SHORELINE BLVD, PID 13-117-24 34 0096 & 0115, P & Z CASE Ahreus, Weycker, ,manimously. BID AWARD; CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD} SNOWPLOWING. 1997-98. RESOLUTION ~/-117 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE BID FOR SNOWPLOWING TO WIDMER BROS., INC. CBD Ahrens, Weycker, unnnimously. Mound City Council Minutes - October 28, 1997 *1.11 PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT- ALTERATION/TRIMMING ON COMMONS - THOMAS R. lVl~NKEN. 1720 DOVE LANE. RF_,SOLUTION #97-118 RESOLIYFION TO APPROVE A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A LAND ALTERATIONS ON PUBLIC LAND KNOWN AS WIOTA COMMON TO Al.lOW TRIMMING OF LILAC BUSHES ABUTTING 1720 DOVE LANE, LOTS 7, 8, & 9, BLOCK 12, D AMWOOD Ahrens, Weycker, unnnimously. ,1.12 PAYMENT OF BILLS. MOTION Ahrem, Weycker, unanimously. The Council then dealt with the 2 items that were removed from the Consent Agenda. 1.13 APPROVE TI:IE MINUTF-$ OF ~ OCTOBER 14. 1997. REGULAR MEETING. Councilmemher Weycker stated she voted against Resolution ~/-110, appointing Andrea Ahrens to the L.M.C.D. for a one year term, beginning January 1, 1998. MOTION made by Weycker, seconded by Hanus to approve the Minutes of the October 14, 1997, Regular Meeting, as amended above. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.14 CASE 97-47; VARIANCE REQUFST FOR A SIDEYARD SETBACK TO REPLACE DECK. BARBARA CASEY, 4704 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE. LOTS 1 & 2. BLOCK 6. DEVON. PI]) Councilmemher Hanus questioned the ninth ~ in the proposed resolution. The City Attorney suggested R be deleted. Hanus moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution deleting Whereas ~9: RESOLUTION #97-119 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO REPLACE EXISTING DECK AT 4704 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 6, DEVON, PID 30-117-23 22 0042, P & Z CASE ~n)7-47 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.15 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: UNPAm TR~Z.~ REMOVAL ASSF-~SlViENT. CHRIS Mound City Council Minutes - October 28, 1997 PALM. 1772 [,AFAYETTE LANE. The City Manager explained that he met with the Park Director and the tree service and has spoken with Ms. Palm on the phone. He stated the stories do not match. His recommendation is that Ms. Palm be aasessed $1500. for the hazardous tree removal. This seemed to be agreeable to Ms. Palm. Councilmember Jensen asked that the sales tax of $97.50 be added to the $1500. The Council agreed. Ahrens moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 97-120 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAH) HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL CHARGES ASSESS1MENT ROLL IN ~ AMOUNT OF $1,597.50 TO BE CERTIFIEI} TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST LEVY #14123 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.16 PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMEND1V~ REGARDING ~TIONAL FIRF_~. The City Manager explained the background. The City Attorney has drafted an ordinance amendment based on discussion at the COW Meeting for the Council's review. He reported that a change is proposed to the first paragraph to read as follows: After considerable discussion the following was changed in the proposed ordinance amendment: I_ Section 235 of the City Code is amended by adding_ a new Section 235:25 to read as follows: Section 235:25. Recreati0ng! Irmr~. "' ........ '-~" -.:'~.-' .... :, -~- :- F-~-~,-'~ .... ~ ~--- .... ~, ~"~:~..~.~ e~:~. No _~on ~. commence, condu~ or ~ow ~y ~tio~ ~ ~ vio~tion of ~e con~tiom d~dbed ~low. ~ ..... '" ....... :":^- ~ ' .... The reeulations contained in this Section and the oermit requirement in Section 235:27 are not applicable for fires contained in a charcoal grill; camp stove, or other similar device, Subd. 1. Def'mitions. For purposes of this Section the following definitions shall apply. (a) "Attendant" is the same as a competent, unimpaired adult. Morned Ci~ Council Minutes - October 28, 1997 (b) "Burner" means a firebox, a barrel or similar container used for an outdoor fire, but not including grills or barbecues used principally for the cooking of food. (c) "Competent, Unimpaired Adult" means a person over eighteen (18) years of age ',?,t who is not under the influence of alcohol or other drugs, who shall be the responsible party for directly supervising an open bum and who shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with this Section. (d) "Fire Chief" means the appointed Fire Chief or any individual designated by the Fire Chief to perform specific duties. (e) "Recreational Fh-e" means a fire set for cooking or warming or other recreational purpo~ which are is not more than three (3) feet in diameter and three (3) feet in flame height, and has a non-combustible separation between the fire area and adjoining combustible material such as bricks or stones and has had the ground five (5) feet from the base of the fire cleared of all combustible material. (0 "Starter Fuels" means dry, untrea~, unpainted wood or charcoal fire starter. Paraffin candles, commercially available products for use in starting charcoal grills and alcohols are permitted as starter fuels and as aides to ignition only. Propane gas torches or other clean burning devices causing minimal pollution may be used to start up an open fire. Starter fuels do not include gasoline, diesel fuel, kerosene, and hearing oil. (g) "Wood" means dry, clean fucl only such as twigs, branches, limbs, "Presto- logs", "duraflame logs", charcoal, cord wood, and untreated dimensional lumber, including clean pallets. "Fuel" does not include wood that is green; leaves or needles; grass clippings; garden waste; wood that is rotten, oil soaked or treated with paint, glue or preservative; plywood, particle board, chip board, finished paneling, or painted, treated, or stained cardboard or paper. 6 Mound City Council Minute~ - October 28, 1997 Subd. 2. Subd. 3. General Requirements. recreational tn'es: The following_ general requirements shall apply to aH (a) The rwe shah be attended bv a competent, unim_oaired adult at all times that .nmoke is oroduced from the fire. (b) Equioment to control and ext' _roguish the f'we shall be immediately available to the attendant at the site of the f'we at aH times during_ burning_. This may include, hand tools, hose lines, and water buckets. (c) A me. hq of snmmolfing the Fire Deoartment shall be ' avai~ble -.t '~c ~:.t¢ c,f '~¢ P~ for use by the attendant. (d) Only Wood. as dermed in Subd. leg) of this Section and starter Fuels as def'med in Subd. lCf) may be burned in a recreational f'we. (e) The f'we may not be started or cootlnued in situations where prevailino winds or other factors create an unsafe condition or direct smoke toward other nearby residences. The rm~ ~hah r.c.t be located ,-'-~'in 25 fcc*. a safe distance from any structure or combustible material. ~g~ Recreational f'wes may be conducted at any time of the day or nieht. Recreation~ fires shah not be allowed, if any of the followine conditions exist: (a) A fir~ hozard exists or develo_m during the course of the burn. pollution or nuisance conditions develop durine the course of the burn. The rwe is left unattended, or the attendant is impaired. (d) The fh~ i~ allowed to .~nolder with no flame visible and is unattended. Any of the conditions c,f ~ _~,c;-"...".t of this Section are violated during the course of the burn. He Mound City Council Minute~ - October 28, 1997 Section 235:27 of the City Code is ame~dt~! by ameudln? Subdivision 1 t_hereon to r~d au follows: Subd. 1, O_oen Burning_ Prohibited. In addition to the reonimmeut co~.tain_~! in Section 235:25. it shall be unlawful for any person to start or allow to bum any open fire,~ recreational fire on ~ ~ property within the City of Mound without a permit ~ ~'~-*'o.~,,~,,~, ...... ~,..,~o.":"" No permit shall be required of any official fire set by any public official as provided in Section 490:20. HI, Section 920:05 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Section 920:05. Hours of Burnlne. Except as otherwise authorized by the provisions of Section 235.'25 and 235:27, '~ · ,, ,,., ..,,, .... o .... 6, no person shall, within the City, bum or cause to be burned any bonfire, outdoor rubbish or brush between the hours of midnight and noon of any day. PAM AM]DON, 1909 ! al~eaide Lane, stated she is in favor of no burning from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. an would like everyone to have to have a permit for recreational fires. The following persons were in favor of allowing recreational fires without a permit. Lee Dorholt, 4924 Tuxedo Blvd. Phil Klein, 5010 Woodland Road. Tom Aune, 5011 Enchanted Road. Tom Lehinen, 3161 Alexander Lane. Polston moved and Jensen seconded the following: ORDINANCE NO. 90-1997 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 235 AND 920 OF THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO ~TIONAL The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.17 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PREqENT. There was no response. 1.18 RESOLUTION 97- RESOL~ON REO~~G HENNEPIN COUNTY TO CONDUCT A FEASIBILITY STUDY REGARDING A STOPLIGHT TO BE LOCATEr~ AT SHOR~I,1NF, DRIVE AND WILSHIRE BLVD. The City Manager explained that he has received a request from a citizen for a stoplight to be installed at Shoreline Drive and Wilshire Blvd. Since Shoreline Drive is a County Road, he felt asking Hennepin County to conduct a feasibility study on this would be in order. He stated if the County feels it is warranted, it could cost the City $75,000 to $120,000. The Police Dept. reports that there has been about 21 accidents at this intersection in the past 3-4 years. The Council discussed the request and decided they would like to do some research and hold a public heating on this before requesting that the County conduct Mound City Council Minutes - Oaober 28, 1997 a feasibility study. No action was taken on this item at this time. 1.19 pLANNING COMMLqSION ITEMS Councilmember Hanus stated that at the Planning Commission meeting last night there was a case where a person wanted to add a conforming structure on a lot that was substandard in size. It was suggested that there are other cities they thought are using CDBG monies to alleviate some of these problems. He did not know if the city was using these funds to purchase undersized lots. The Planning Commission would like to see this researched to see if CDBG funds are available for this purpose. The City Manager will check into this. The City Attorney stated that the City of Richfield has a very aggressive scattered site housing program and one of their goals is to pick up substandard lots and lots that have blighted homes. The entire City has been set up as a redevelopment project area. Each new house is its own tax increment district and they are using the tax increment that the property generates to help finance a revolving fund to purchase new sites to keep the process going. The City Manager explained that six or seven years ago, the County took the money that was not used in CDBG was put in a discretionary pool and cities could apply for it. Mound did apply for $250,000 to use for scattered site housing. He had to go before a committee of citizens from all over the County and they couldn't understand why we wanted to do this and turned it down. He further explained that Mound's total allocation of CDBG money is about $65,000 per year and which helps fund the social services and private rehab. The City Attorney will forward Richfield's program information to the City Manager for review. The other issue was one that has been talked about at previous COW Meetings. The Planning Commission is asking to be directed to start drawing up or looking at a Truth in Zoning Ordinance. Councilmember Hanus stated he knows the City Council is split on this. He felt if given certain restrictions and certain conditions, he could support this depending on how it is written and how it is made up. The Council asked what the Planning Commission is trying to accomplish. Councilmember Hanus stated that someone goes to sell their property, the prospective buyer would be told whether or not the lot is conforming, if it's known, whether it's nonconforming, but primarily they are given a zoning sheet that tells them what the setbacks are for their zone. It would be purely informational and very minimal in cost. It would inform prospective buyers of the zone they are in and what the zoning restrictions and requirements are. It would be something that would be required by ordinance and everyone would be required to do it. The vehicle used for enforcement would be at closing where there would be a document that the City would require to be signed stating that prospective buyers have received this information. The Mayor stated he would be willing to make this information available upon request, but he is absolutely opposed to making the this a requirement of the City. Councilmember Ahrens stated she does not like the idea of the City being involved in all closings on the sale of property. The City Attorney stated there are several cities who have a zoning information handout that they make available for people who request it. He will get one for the Council to review for information purposes. There seemed to be support on the Council for this. 9 29..~'8 Mound C~y Council M~maes - O~ober 28, 1997 No action was ~en on this item. INFORMATION/I~f[~CELLANF~U$~ A. Financial Repor~ for September, 1997 as prepared by Gino Businaro, Ninance Director. B. LMCD Mailings C. Update from Hennepin County Regarding Affordable Housing and Maintaining Quality Communities. D. Dock & Commons Advisory Commission Minutes of October 16, 1997. E. Correspondence from Karen Cole, Kennedy & Graven, RE: Woodland Point Summons. Correspondence includes: (1) Answer to Certain Respondents Abutting Wawonaissa Common, Notice filed by two landowners abutting Wawonaissa Common (James and Lisa Prom) seeking to intervene as respondents, along with an answer similar to that filed by the other respondents; and (2) Additional answer filed by Elizabeth A. Vucinovich-$ohnson and Keith O. Johnson. F. REMINDER: Dedication of tree/plaque at Centerview Beach for Frank Weila~d, Saturday, October 25, 1997, 1 a.m. G. 1],1~11~1~ Committee meeting regarding the Westonka Community Center, Wednesday, October 29, 1997, 7:30 P.M., Westonka Community Center. H. REMINDER: Annual Christmas Party, Sunday, December 14, 1997. Location to be determined. I. ]]~I]~F,~I Only City Council Meeting in November will be on Tuesday, November 18, 1997. No meetings on November 11 (Veterans Day) and November 25. MOTION made by Jeusen, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at 9:15 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward I. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Attest: City Clerk MINUTES-CITY OF MOUND CITY COUNCIL AND WESTONKA SCHOOL BOARD- OCTOBER 29, 1997 The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. at the Westonka Community Center. Members from City of Mound: Polston, Jensen, Hanus and Weycker; City Manager Ed Shukle. Members from Westonka School District: Pinegar and Charon; Superintendent of Schools Dr. Pam - Myers. Also Present: Bert Haglund, TSP/EOS. Review of Formal Response from Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning Ed Shukle, City Manager provided copies of the formal response from the Department of Children, Families and Learning under the review and comment requirement of Minnesota Statutes. The formal response gave approval to the joint project's application for positive review and comment. Dr. Pam Myers and Bert Haglund indicated that they had spoken to the State Department's representative who was assigned to review and comment on the project, regarding the withdrawal of Minnetrista from project. He said that this would have no effect on the response already given. Update on Brochure/Mailing The brochure has been printed and was ready for mailing on October 30, 1997. It would be mailed to 9,780 residents within the School District and surrounding area. Kristin Dodge Narjes arranged for 15,000 brochures to be printed. Extras will be distributed in the area as needed. Joint Powers Agreement Elements A more detailed discussion was held on this matter than previously. The outline from David Kennedy was followed and concepts were either agreed to or need further clarification. It was agreed that further discussion regarding the joint powers agreement be put aside until after approval of the referendum. Hanus asked the City Manager for a list of possible of revenues that could cover the City's portion of the operating costs if that portion was $190,000. Shukle indicated that he would provide that before the November 4 informational meeting. Preparation for Informational Meetings It was agreed that Mayor Polston and Chair Pinegar would introduce the project by providing background. Bert Haglund would present the preliminary design and cost estimate using A/V equipment. Questions would then be answered by Polston, Pinegar and Haglund. It was noted that the first informational meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, November 4, 1997, 7:30 p.m., Minnetrista City Hall. Canvassing of Election Results The Westonka School Board will canvass the results of the election immediately upon receiving the results on December 4, 1997. Minutes of City Council/Westonka School Board October 29, 1997 Page 2 The next meeting of this group was not scheduled. Ifa meeting is necessary, it will be held between the November 4 and the November 19 informational meetings. Other Business There being no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m. ~.~bmitted, Ed Shukle City Manager November 12, I997 PROPOSED RESOLUTION/~97- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A LOT SIZE, YARD, AND HARDCOVER VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND STORY ADDITION AT 4994 MANCHESTER ROAD, LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD PID 25-117-24 42 0005, P & Z CASE #97-54 WHEREAS, the applicant, Tom Alexander, has applied for a lot area, yard, and hardcover variances to build a second story addition on the property located at the intersection of Manchester and Cambridge, and; . .: WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 Two Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet, and 40 feet of lot frontage, and; WHEREAS, the existing Lot area is 4,700 square feet requiring a 1,300 square feet variance, and; WHEREAS, the existing front yard setback is 10.6" requiring a variance of 9.4' and a rear setback of 6.2' requiring a 8.8' variance, and; WHEREAS, the hardcover calculations is 3389 square feet requiring a variance of 1509 square feet, and; WHEREAS, the proposed 10 X 30 deck will conform to setbacks, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval of the variance recommend by staff, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City does hereby grant a lot area variance of 1300 square feet, a front yard variance of 9.4', a rear yard variance of 8.8' and a hardcover variance of 1509 square feet with the following conditions: A determination of the crawl space be made by the Building Official. Removal of any concrete to the west of the home. The proposed deck will be only 10 X 30. November 12, 1997 Alexander Page 2 The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 350:420, Subdivision 8 of the Zoning Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the structures described in paragraph number one above remain as lawful, nonconforming structures subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land: Building a second story addition and a 10 x 30 deck. 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lot 12, Block 33, Wychwood This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk mi J 61~-~86858 HO I S I NGTON KOEGLER 8~5 P02 |1.i , il, NOU 06 '97 15:42 PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. flll I IH TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: November 10, 1997 SUBJECT; Lot size, yard and hardcover variances OWNER: Thomas I. Alexander - 4994 Manchester Road CASE NUMBER: 97-54 HKG FILE NUMBER: 97-511 LOCATION: 4994 Manchester Road EXISTING ZONING: Residential District R-2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking a variance to recognize the lot size, yard and hardcover variances to build a second story addition. The setback and proposed variance are listed below. Existing/Proposed Required Variance Lot Area 4,700 sf 6,000 sf 1,300 sf Hardcover 3389 sf 1880 sf 1509 sf Front Yard 10.6' 20' 9.4' Rear Yard 6.2' 15' 8.8' This proposal is the second attempt to built a two story home on the property. As you recall, this case is very similar to the Dow case held before the Planning Commission in October of 1996. In that case, the owner had also proposed a second story addition but never completed the project. The current proposal is to push out the front wall of the house to match the garage wall and open foundation bricks. A second story addition would be built over the home leaving the garage in a one story design. The proposed addition would have a single hip roof to match the design of the garage. Cedar siding is proposed for the exterior for all of the house. The concrete patio on the lakeside would stay and a new deck is proposed on the south side of the patio which would stay behind the edge of the patio keeping it out of the Brighton Commons land. COMMENTS: A variance can be granted in Mound only on the basis of a finding of hardship or practical difficulty. Under the Mound Code, variances may be granted only in the event that the 123 North Third Street. Suit~ 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) ~3~-0So0 Fax (612) 338.6S38 612-3386838 HOISINGTON KOEGLER 835 P03 NOU 06 '97 15:43 following circumstances exist (S~tion 350:530): Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot siz~ or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property since enactment of the ordinance have no control. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant' of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance. C. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. That granting of the variance request will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. E. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. F. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Ordinance or to property in the same zone. The proposed improvements will substantially improve the condition and livability of the property. A two story design fits well with the new home construction just south of Manchester Road. The hardcover issues remains unchanged from the previous request. Although the Brighton Commons area cannot be considered in the hardcover calculations, it will provide some relief for filtration. The commons area adjacent to the lot is approximately 2500sf for that area between the north and south lot lines. If included in the property, hardcover would be under the required minimum. One issue not discussed in the previous case was that the house is built with a crawl space that is below the flood elevation. The Building Official has reviewed this issue and has determined a further review will need to be made. ff the crawl space is determined to be a basement as per building code, the owner would need to fill it to a point above 933 feet. Based on the previous case history the recommendation from Staff was for approval of the improvements. The issues of this case are practically identical and Staff RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the variance as requested with the following condition. 1. A determination of the crawl space be made by the Building Official. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 Minutes - Planning Commission November 10. 1997 MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 10, 1997 Those present: Vice Chair Michael Mueller, Orv Burma, Frank Weiland, Gerald Reifschneider, Becky Glister, Council liaison Mark Hanus. Absent and excused: Chair Geoff Michael, Orv Burma, Jerry Clapsaddle. Staff Present: Assistant Planner Loren Gordon, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and Planning Secretary Kris Linquist. Public Present: Tom Alexander, Bob Steele BOARD OF APPEALS: CASE # 97-54: Variance, lot size, yard and hardcover to build a second story addition, Thomas Alexander, 4994 Manchester Road, Lot 12, Block 33, Wychwood, PID 24-117-24 42 0005 Assistant Planner Loren Gordon reviewed this case. The applicant, Thomas Alexander, is seeking a variance to recognize the lot size, yard and hardcover variances to build a second story addition. The setback variance are listed below. Existing/Proposed Required Variance Lot Area 4,700 sf 6,000 sf 1,300 sf Hardcover 3,389 sf 1,880 sf 1,509 sf Front Yard 10.6' 20' 9.4' Rear Yard 6.2' 15' 8.8' This proposal is the second attempt to build a two story home on this property. you recall, this case is very similar to the Dow case held before the Planning Commission in October of 1996. In that case, the owner had also proposed a second story addition but never completed the project. As Minutes - Planning Commission November 10, 1997 The current proposal is to push out the front wall of the house to match the garage and open foundation bricks. A second story addition would be built over the home leaving the garage in a one story design. The proposed addition would have a single hip roof to match the design of the garage. Cedar siding is proposed for the exterior for all of the house. The concrete patio on the lakeside would stay and a new deck is proposed on the south side of the patio which would stay behind the edge of the patio keeping it out of the Brighton Commons land. The proposed improvements will substantially improve the condition and livability of the property. A two story design fits well with the new home construction just south of Manchester Road. The hardcover issues remains unchanged from the previous request. Although the Brighton Commons area cannot be considered in the hardcover calculations, it will provide some relief for filtration. The commons area adjacent to the lot is approximately 2500 sf for that area between the north and south lot lines. If included in the property, hardcover would be under the required minimum. One issue not discussed in the previous case was that the house is built with a crawl space that is below the flood elevation. The Building Official has reviewed this issue and has determined a further review will need to be made. If the crawl space is determined to be a basement as per building code, the owner would need to fill it to a point above 933 feet. Based on the previous case history the recommendation from Staff was for approval of the improvements. The issues of this case are practically identical. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the variance as requested with the following condition: 1. A determination of the crawl space be made by the Building Official. DISCUSSION: Weiland would like see alot of the concrete removed. Gordon stated that he discussed that with the applicant and the applicant agreed. Gordon suggested that the proposed deck be cut back to 10 feet and the concrete underneath be removed. The proposed deck will be 10 x 30 and will be conforming to the setbacks. MOTION by Weiland to motioned to approve staff recommendation with the condition of removing any concrete to the west of the home, with a reduction of the deck of 10 feet in width, Voss seconded. Motion carried 6-0. VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywo. od Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620 OCT 2_. 3 1997 CITY OF MOUND Application Fee: $100.00 (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) : Planning Commission Date: ~JO,~lq"~~ !O , . .~ '7 Case No. qq-6¢ City Council Date: }x~'JO~) e[h("l~4/ i~I Iqg '~ Distribution: City Planner DNR City Engineer Other Public Works st~ECT Address qq~o gO:(;E~.'Iz~ g.~ PROPERTY Lot 1 2.- Block LEGAL Subdivision ~ ~C ~-{ [,~ C. x9 ~3 DESC. PID# /.~*q- [ I ~( - ?2-q -- ~ :L - 0o o~' Plat # ZON~N~ ms~mc~ ~-~ ~-~ ~ B-1 B-2 B-3 PROPERTY Name ~d~ .~ OWNER Address ~ otq~ ~/~C~f~ ~ ~ ~~ Phone (H) ~qg L~ (W) ¢ ~ ~,~q,~ (M) ~& APPLICANT Name (~ OTHER Address THAN Phone (H) (W) (M) OWNER) 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? (~ yes, (l~no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies' of resol~ions. 1}~ ~,,,-.~~'.--'-- 'fl,, ;;-.~m.~ ~u~':' '~ /~. ~.-:~'_ r~~ 3 2. Detailed descfipton of ~oposcd co~st~ctio~ o~ altemtio~ (size, ~umbe~ of stoics, ~pe of use, etc.): (Rev. 1/14/97) Variance Application, P. 2 Case No. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (), No~.,). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: Lakeside: (NSEW) (NSEW) (NSEW) (NSEW) (NSEW) : (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE _ .¢,;~4t (or existing) 6, ft. ft. ft. lC) ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq fi sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ft Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes/~, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: Please Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? (4rtoo narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Variance Application, P. 3 Case No. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~). If yes, explain: Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), NgJ<). If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No 9o). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. '~-"Owner's Signature ~}~4.," Date Applicant's Signature (Rev. 1/14/97) Date CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATION~ (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDRESS: !OWNER'S NAME: LOTAREA qi LOT AREA /~')o o LOT AREA 'H~ '~Cz) SQ. FT. X 30% SQ. FT. X 40% SQ. FT. X 15% = (for all lots) .............. I /cf/0 I = (for Lots of Record*)....... ~ (-,~'~'~ I = (for detached buildings only) *Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 3,50:1225,Subd. 6.13. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE ~-~ X ~¢ = /O~-~- X = TOTAL HOUSE ......................... DETACHED BLDGS X = (GARAGE/SHED) ~) X ~ = TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS ................. DRIVEWAY~ I~ X 30 : ,~'~ ~ AREAS, SIDEWALKS,-----~ H 2-'~ ) ~-. ~ x ~,o = q.g ~ ETC. X = DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .................. X -- opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover OTHER TOTALDECK TOTAL OTHER X t~' = X = TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE UNDER ~dicate difference) ............................... PREPARED BY ' .~~ Il 15:00 I I, I , J, i ,i , , 473-4435 COFFIN & GRONBERG .~$:.LZ FAX ~i~; 472, 0820 CITY 0~"~OU.ND ~ ' CITY OF PAGE 84 --~- ANCtlOR $ClENTIF% MOUND EXISTING LOT AREA ~'""7OO / ~//O EXISTING LOT AREA 8Q FT X 30% = SOFT X lS%. - l~O0! HOUSE: GARAGE: DRIVEWAY:" DECK: (if i~per~tous surface under deck.- 1002) OTHER; LENGTH ,' WIDTH X W ' TOTAL DRIVEWAY **''*****--*-..... X%, TOTAL DECK ' TOTAL DECK @ TOTAL OTHER TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER · * ,.,-.~. · · 338':l ',.~"?O0 = 72,'11 ~ · . · · " UN~. ~ov~-..------..-.................. ............ ~-: ......... Z~,..' .......L,'..,~ ........ ~: ......... ',, , ' .., ' ' . CO .' ~: ~,~ f~~ /. o~.~ 1~-3o_'"'" 10/13/97 10:52 F.~. 612 627 0679 SBL ~IYER -_. "Exterior' Envelope Thermal Transr~'littance Worksheet ~ 001/0O3 SITE ADDRESS CITY 4994 MANCHESTER ROAD MOUND FORM COMPLETED BY: D,ATE JACK # IASSEME~LY IFLOOR IAREA ,., Ilnsulated Area o IFraming Ama 'e [S~llght 7. · IAverage U-Factor B ' 20,79479221 [o IRequired U.Factor (from Enemy Code):_ AR I U-Factor J U-Factor Sq. FL x Area J 1320 1188,000 .022 26.162 132.000 .020 2.633 ,000 ,000 .DOD ,00o .000 .000 A 1320,000 IA 1320 C .022 D .026 ,000 Insulated ~krea 2 ' 1652.418 " .043 71,317 Framing Area 2 236.800 .091 21,449 Windows 1 321.000 .270 86.670 DOom 37.782 .OOO Rim Joist 260.000 ,041 10,565 Fireplace Wall .000 Above Grade Founctation Wall .0,5,7 .000 Foundation Windows .000 Patio Doors 120.000 ,270 32,400 ~Dther .000 .000 .000 , .000 .000 ,, ,000 Totals E 2628.000 ~ F 222.401 Average U.Factor F?7?4012254 AE 2628 mm mm G .0,5 j jj Required U-Factor (from Energ~ Code):'. [] . .110 mm ,ma If C is greater than D, or G is greater ti', an H, revise the clesign as necessary to me~t the envel'~pe criteria of the Energy Code, 1) U.faot~r for skylight rand window must be determined by the National FenectraU~n Rating Coundl Standard 100-91 or ASHRAI~ t 993 Ha ndbook of Fundarl'~al'ltJ~,, ( ;haptar 27, t~bte 5. Thermal Transmittance of opaque gomp~nents (including integrally inaulated masonr~ and metal ~tud Immlng)-- u~e part 7b'70.0450, subp~tl't 4. RECEIVED .0CT231997 ,MOUND PLANNING &' INSR 10/15/97 III Form for use with Minnesota Rules part 7§79.0475, Subp.2 1 & 2. Family Residential "Cookbook" Method ] ITE ADDRESS 4994 MANCHESTER ROAD UlLDER TOM ALEX I& ~002/003 JOLTY JMOUND J DATE J 10/13/97 Minimum criteria: Rim Jo)st: R-lO insulation Entry dosr~'. I -~4 Inch molld wood with storm or battmr Foundation Windows: Insulated glass, 1/2" air space, wood or vinyl frame STEP t Window & Door Ama Total Window & Door Area Sq. F,.'. et WINDOWS (including foundation win,:~ows): Dimensions City Area 3,000 4,500 2,000 27,000 .5.000 3.000 3.000 45.000 5.000 4.000 1.001) 20.000 9,000 7.000 2.000 126.000 4,500 7.000 2.000 63,000 8.000 6.000 1.00t) 40,000 0.000 0,000 0,000 0.000 -0.000 Total Window Area 321,000 DOORS: 3.000 6.667 i.0¢ 2,667 6.667 1.0C 2o,0olj 17.781J 0,oooJ 37,782l Total Doom Area. TotalArea of Windows & Doors I 358,782 IBex A Total Well Area in Sq, Ft. Wall Total P~rimeter Height Area m,ooo, 1.o& s.oool 148.000 1.000 8.0001184,000 O.OOO 0,000 2368.000 BOX B STEP 2 Calculate area as a percent of wall Box A (window & door area)divided by Box B(total wall area) limes, 100 equals the window an0 ~oor area as a percent of wall area (Box¢) Box A 358.782 xl00= Box B 2308.000 STEP 3 Design Features 15.151 Box C ASSEMBLY OPTION' FRAME WALL: sTANDARD FRAMING IX ADVANCED FRAMING ;AVl'P(' INSULATION SHEATHING; R-5 OR MORE V~NDOWS(EXCEPT FOUNDATION WINDOWS): U-FACTOR u-J 0.270J From the table, determine She maxi['num percent window & door area for th.e design 6~tlons sel=cted and enter tho value in I~ox D below: sox D I' Box C must be less than or equal to Box D 10:$3 F.4.[ $1~ 62? 06?9 Assembly R and U-Factor Forms ASSEMBLY ROOF AT FRAMINg Material (Describe) Thic~n ess R-Value Interior Film Coefficient .610 Sheet Rock .~60 _Ceiling Member ~.,~50. ,, ~E-_xtericr Film Coefr,;ient 810 Total Assembly Th er'mai Resistance E,).130 Assembly U-Factor (l/Total R) .020 SBL RIVER ¥~{D [~003/003 ASSEMBLY ROOF AT INSULATION ~aterial (Describe) Thick, ness R-Value Interior Film Coefficient .680 She.t Jr~sulation 44.000 Exterior Film coefficient ' .170 Tntal Assembly Thermal Resistance 45~410 _A~sembly U-Factor (1/Total R) :022 ASSEMBLY WALL AT FP, AMING Material (Describe) Thickness R,Value Interior Film Coefficient ,880 Sheet Rock ,450 St~ud 0.870 8, h~athing 2.060 Siding .B10 Exterior Film Coefficient .17o' Total Assembly Thermal Resistance 1 ', .040 Assembly U-Factor (1/Total R) ,091 ASSEMBLY WALL AT INSULATION, Material (Describe) Thlckness R-Value I_nterior Film Coefficient .680 Sheet Rock ,450 Insulation 19.000 Sheathing 2.080 Siding! ,810 Exterior Film Coefficient .17a Total Assembly Thermal Resistance 23.170 Assembly U-Factor (1/Total R) .043 ASSEMBLY RIM Material,(D~cribe) Thickness R.,v'alue Interior Film Coefficient :380' l_nsuiation 19.000 Rim ! ,890 Sheathlnc~l ;:,060 Siding .310 Ex'tedor Film Coefficient 170 Total As,sembly Thermal Resistance 2,~.610 ,,A, ssembly U-Factor (1/']'oral R) 341 ASSEMBLY BLOCK Materiel (Describe) 'l'l~ickness R-Value Interior Film Coefficient .... ~; Concrete Block 1.280 Optional Insulation 11 .ooo Stud ~ ,. ., 4.3.50 Exterior Film CoefrK~ient .170 Total Assembly Thermal Resistance ' 17.480 Assembly U-Factor (1/Total,R) ,0'57 OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR TOM ALEXANBER LOT 12, BLOCK 55, WYCHWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Z 0 0 Z / -- S 89052, E 1OO.OO ... -,1 2.Ii N 89~52' W 100.00 , MALVERN LANE (NOW KNOWN AS /V~,Z~NCNESTER ROb, D} LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : Lot 12, Block 55, WYCHWOOD denotes iron morker denotes existing spot elevotion, meon seo level dotum Beorings shown ore bosed upon on ossumed dotum. This survey intends to show the boundories of the obove described property, the tocotion of on existing house, ond the Iocotion of oll visible "hordcover" thereon. It does not purport to show ony other improvements or encroochments. RECEIVED NOV - 7 1997 MOUND PLANNING & INSR November 9, 1997 City of Mound City Council Mound Planning Commission and staff 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Madam or Sir, We have reviewed ptm~s =ub,,m~,~ by Thomas 2der for a variance & building permits at 49q~ Manchester Road, and have no objections to the proposed residential dwelling. We would approve of immediate permits for this project. Thank you for your considerations. Sue Engauser Bill Engauser 2971 Cambridge Road, Mound, MN 55364 November 9, 1997 CiD' of Mound City Council Mound Planning Commission and staff 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Madam or Sir, We have reviewed plans submitted by Thomas Alexander for a variance & building permits at 499~ Manchester Road, and have no objections to the proposed residential dwelling. We would approve of immediate permits for this project. Thank you for your considerations. Beth Anderson Bob Anderson 3001 Manchester Road, Mound, MN 55364 CITY OF MOUND - ZONING II(HJ,~E ......... REAR N S LAKE N S TOP OF DLUFF INFORMATION SHEET ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: B! 7,500/0 B2 20,000/80 B3 10,OOO/60 R2 14,000/80 R3 SEE ORD. I1 30,O00/100 REQUIRED [ EXISTING/PROPOSED GARAGE. SllEl) ..... OR OTIIER DETACI1ED BUILDINGS FRONT N S E W SIDE N S E W 4' OR 6' SIDE N S E W 4' OR6' REAR N S E W 4' LAKE N S E W 50' Planning Department at 472-0600. /gO ' VARIANCE - I TOP OF BLUFF I ~ ] . 10' OR 30' HARDCOVER ~ ~o~ o)(.~,~. I / ~'<~/h ' y n~izes n portion of the requirements oullined in the Cily Mound Zoning Ordinance. For fur/h.r information, con.ct the City of Mound 11.6-97 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION REGARDING CASE 97-54: TOM ALEXANDER, 4994 MANCHESTER ROAD. PREVIOUS VARIANCE CASE 96-60: JOHN DOW MINUTES OF A MEETING OF MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1996 CASE 96-60: VARIANCE FOR ADDITION (PHASE I, II, & III) , JOHN NED & DIXIE DOW~ 4994 MANCH_~STER ROAD, LOT 12~ BLOCK 33# W~CHWOOD~ PID 24-117-24 42 0005 City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the Planning Report. the property owner received a variance in 1987 to expand an existing single family home. After variance approval, the foundation of the home was expanded. In 1989, the garage was expanded 6 feet to the south. In 1990, this item went before the Planning Commission and City Council to clarify the extent of the allowed home expansion. Specifically, Resolution 90-79 allowed a two story expansion of the structure. In the nine years since the initial variance approval, the only construction that occurred was the initial foundation expansion which remains uncompleted. The owner is now seeking variance approval to complete the project in three phases running from 1997 to 199. Since this request was initially reviewed in 1987 and again in 1990, Mound has instituted three changes in the Zoning Code which impact this case. The first involves hardcover restrictions. The subject site is no limited to a maximum of 40% hardcover. The limitation was not in place in 1990. The second change involves the applicable setbacks for the single family home. In order to acknowledge alleys and fire lanes that are 15 feet in width or less, the City added a provision to the code which states, "In residential districts, street frontages created by the existence of alleys, such alleys having a total width not exceeding 15 feet, shall be considered side yards or rear yards, as appropriate, and subject to applicable district setbacks." As a result, Manchester Lane is now considered the front yard subject to a 20 foot setback and Cambridge is considered the side yard subject to a 6 foot setback. The Mound Street and Utility Department does not consider Cambridge to be an improved street and it is not maintained by the City. The third change involves building completion. In 1994, the City amended its code to require that "all work to be performed pursuant to a building permit obtained for new construction, repairs, remodeling, and alterations to the exterior of any building or structure in any zoning district shall be completed within one (1) year from the date of permit issuance." iai j I i I, ,,IJ~ i ~ , i&, ~ ~, Planning Commission Minutes October 14, I996 In order to expand the existing home consistent with the plan that has been in place since 1990, the following variances will be necessary: Existing/ Required Proposed Variance Lot Area 6,000 sf 4,700 sf 1,300 sf Hardcover 1,880 sf 3,439 sf 1,559 sf Front Setback 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet Rear Setback 15 feet 6.2 feet 8.8 feet The applicant's proposed phasing plan identifies the second floor addition over the garage as the first phase. Prior to any new construction occurring, however, completion of the initial first floor improvements that began in 1987 needs to occur. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested variances to allow expansion of the existing home in three phases from 1997 to 1999. The phases shall be as shown in the application. The approval shall be subject to the following conditions: Work allowed under the building permit to be issued shall be phased as follows with total exterior completion occurring prior to the initiation of the next phase. Phase A: Completion of all first floor exterior work including but not limited to siding, soffit and fascia work, filling and capping the foundation, exterior siding and completion of the front entry. Phase B: Total completion of the exterior work identified in the applicant's Phase I as shown on attached Exhibits A and B. Phase C: Total completion of the exterior work identified in the applicant's Phase II as shown on attached Exhibits A and C. Phase D: Total completion of the exterior work identified in the applicant's Phase III as shown on attached Exhibits A and D. The applicant shall submit detailed plans for the construction of the transition areas between phases as part of the overall building permit application. The applicant shall prepare and submit a grading plan or spot elevations demonstrating compliance with Section 350:1225, Subd. 6. B. 1. The requirement of this section pertain to techniques that are required for impervious cover for lots of record. Planning Commission Minutes October 14, I996 Hanus questioned how the time limit works when phases are involved. The Planner indicated that when the building permit is issued for each phase they would have one year from that date, and each phase must be applied for in the year indicated. If the project is not completed in five years, the variance will become null and void. Weiland feels that it is too long to carry out the project and feels it is too much of an imposition on the neighborhood to have construction carry on for that amount of time. He feels the entire project should be completed in one year. Burma suggested the applicant's phase I should be to finish the exterior, and phase II could be to finish interior, etc. Dow requested clarification of Phase A. Sutherland reviewed that this phase includes new sheathing on the garage, the hole by the front door needs to be filled-in and capped, the soffit and fascia work on the garage needs to be finished, the floor needs to be poured, etc. Dow informed Sutherland that his house has a crawl space, it is not a slab. Sutherland informed Mr. Dow that the floor of the crawl space will need to be raised to an elevation of 933. The floodplain elevations were reviewed. Sutherland estimated that approximately 6 inches of fill will need to be placed in the crawl space and a surveyor will need to verify the finished lowest floor elevation. MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Voss to recommend denial of the phase plan and to direct staff to work on a solution to get the outside completed so other properties do not have to be subjected to the on-going construction. There was discussion relating to the completion of the exterior. Dow stated that he would rather withdraw or table his request so he has time to rethink the project. The Commission discussed the issue of application time limit if the case is tabled. Koegler stated, if the applicant requests the tabling, the clock stops. Sutherland confirmed that Dow could continue work on the first floor items without the variance approval, however building permits will need to be issued to complete the siding and fill in the foundation. Weiland withdrew his motion. MOTION made by Weiland to table the variance, request of the applicant. Seconded by ross. carried unanimously. at the Motion Creative Solutions for Land Planning and Design Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. II'll l ln PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: October 7, 1996 SUBJECT: Variance Request APPLICANT: John Ned and Dixie Dow CASE NUMBER: 96-60 HKG FILE NUMBER: 96-5cc LOCATION: 4994 Manchester Road EXISTING ZONING: Single Family Residential (R-1 A) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND: The property owner received a variance in 1987 to expand an existing single family home. After variance approval, the foundation of the home was expanded. In 1989, the garage was expanded 6 feet to the south. In 1990, this item went before the Planning Commission and City Council to clarify the extent of the allowed home expansion. Specifically, Resolution 90-79 allowed a two story expansion of the structure. In the nine years since the initial variance approval, the only construction that occurred was the initial foundation expansion which remains uncompleted. The owner is now seeking variance approval to complete the project in three phases running from 1997 to 1999. Since this request was initially reviewed in 1987 and again in 1990, Mound has instituted three changes in the Zoning Code which impact this case. The first involves hardcover restrictions. The subject site is now limited to a maximum of 40% hardcover. This limitation was not in place in 1990. The second change involves the applicable setbacks for the single family home. In order to acknowledge alleys and fire lanes that are 15 feet in width or less, the City added a provision to the Code which states, "in residential districts, street frontages created by the existence of alleys, such alleys having a total width not exceeding 15 feet, shall be considered side yards or rear yards, as appropriate, and subject to applicable district setbacks." As a result, Manchester Lane is now 7300 Metro Boulevard, Suite 525, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 (612) 835-9960 Fax (612)835-3160 Planning Report - October 8, 1996 Dow Variances - Case #96-60 Page 2 considered the front yard subject to a 20 foot setback and Cambridge is considered a side yard subject to a 6 foot setback. The Mound Street and Utility Department does not consider Cambridge to be an improved street and it is not maintained by the City. The third change involves building completion. In 1994, the City amended its code to require that "all work to be performed pursuant to a building permit obtained for new construction, repairs, remodeling, and alterations to the exterior of any building or structure in any zoning district shall be completed within one (1) year from the date of permit issuance." In order expand the existing home consistent with the plan that has been in place since 1990, the following variances will be necessary: Required Existing/Proposed Variance Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 4,700 sq. ft. 1,300 sq. ft. Hardcover 1880 sq. ft. 3,439 sq. ft. 1,559 sq. ft. Front Yard Setback 20' 10' 10' Rear Yard Setback 15' 6.2' 8.8' COMMENT: On two previous occasions the City of Mound has approved variances necessary to construct the proposed addition to the home. The fact that the building permit and one year time frame for variance approval has expired coupled with changes in the Mound Zoning Code require that variance approval once again be granted. Despite the fact that the roles have changed, the specific request has not. Because of two prior approvals, staff feels that approval is once again warranted. The applicant's proposed phasing plan identifies the second floor addition over the garage as the first phase. Although this area will eventually become second floor living space, apparently it will be used on an interim basis for storage. The building plans call for the installation of a pull down stairway to gain access to the garage addition. The City does not specifically regulate phasing of building projects. In staff's view, the second floor garage addition will create a rather unbalanced appearance until such time as the remainder of the second floor is completed in 1998 and 1999. It is also unclear as to how the transition areas will be handled between second floor phases. Will the future interior wall be sided on the exterior or is it the applicant's intent to simply leave the sheathing in place until the next phase occurs? Prior to any new construction occurring, however, completion of the initial first floor improvements that began in 1987 needs to occur. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested variances to allow expansion of the existing home in three phases from 1997 to 1999. The phases shall be as shown in the application. The approval shall be subject to the following conditions: Planning Report - October 8, 1996 Dow Variances - Case ~96-60 Page 3 1. Work allowed under the building permit to be issued shall be phased as follows with total exterior completion occurring prior to initiation of the next phase: Phase A - Completion of all first floor exterior work including but not limited to siding, soffit and facia work, filling and capping the foundation, exterior siding and completion of the front entry. Phase B - Total completion of the exterior work identified in the applicants Phase I as shown on attached Exhibits A and B. Phase C - Total completion of the exterior work identified in the applicant's Phase II as shown on attached Exhibits A and C. Phase D - Total completion of the exterior work identified in the applicant' s Phase 1II as shown on attached Exhibits A and D. 2. The applicant shall submit detailed plans for the construction of the transition areas between phases as part of the overall building permit application. The applicant shall prepare and submit a grading plan or spot elevations demonstrating compliance with Section 350:1225, Subd. 6. B. 1. The requirements of this section pertain to techniques that are required for impervious cover for lots of record. Exhibit A Exhibit B CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN NED DOW LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD HENHEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 9Zg. z5 -I I hereby certify that thi'~ is a true and a correct representation oF a survey oF the boundaries of Lot 12, Block 33, WYCHWOOD, and the location of ~ll existings buildings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. Scale: 1" : 30' Date : 4-16-87 o : Iron marker 9~.~: Spot elevation Datum: Mean Sea Level COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lic. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota Exhibit C CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN NED DOW LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Phase II 1st floor extension & 2nd floor addition : ~z 8. ZS I hereby certify that thi~ is a true and a correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 12, Block 33, WYCHWOOD, and the location of ~1! existings bui!dings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. Scale: 1" = 30' Date : 4-16-87 o : Iron marker ~%93~: Spot elevation Datum: Mean Sea Level COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lic. No. ~2755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Ptanners Long Lake, Minnesota Exhibit D CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN NED DOW LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Phase II! 1 st floor extension & 2nd floor addition S o ~' 4°~'~°97 : 9z&zs I hereby certify that thi~ is a true and a correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 12, Block 33, WYCHWOOD, and the location of ~11 existings bui!dings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. Scale: 1" : 30' Date : 4-16-87 o : Iron marker ~: Spot etevation Datum: Mean Sea Leve! COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lic. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Ptanners Long Lake, Minnesota VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620 · bE 3_..0/"! LpPlication Fee: ~. (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) Planning Commission Date: ]0 -Iq --~ ~ Case No. q 6 '" ~tt~ City Council Date: !0 ~ 2.~..-- C~ ~ Distribution: ~ ~ - [ City Planer [ ~- [ D~ ~' City Engin~r ~ ~' Public Works PROPERTY Lot I ~ Block ~ 3 LEG~ Subdivision '~V~ ~ ~V~O D DESC. PID~ ~4-)1'~-- T~ 4'~ ~~ Plat ~ ZONING DIST~CT R-1 ~A~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 PROPERTY $~e ~¢~ ~ ~ D/~[~ ~ D~V~' OW~R Address qqQ AAfiN 5 I IZD Dc:kiD, APPLIC~ N~e (IF OTHER Address TH~ Phone ~) ~) (M). O~ER) Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ~ yes, ( ) no. ff yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. '~ Ocx_,"F//..P,'I ~ 7- / 2. Detailed descripton of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Application, P. 2 Case No. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (), No ~). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED (or existing) VARIANCE Front Yard: ( N~ S~W ) ~' iC' ft. t~",c-° ft. C_ ~ ft. Side Yard: (~),~.E W ) ~ ft. ¢. Z- ft. ~ . ft. Side Yard: ( N(~)E W ) ~6~' ft. IF', ' ft. lC" ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. : (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft. Lot Size: ~Cfi,O sq ft z~'7/.~; sq ft i.~ sq ft Hardcover: l~.c-c~C~ sq ft ~c4~ sq ft /5'-~c/ sq ft Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ~,x), No'"'l~. If no, specify each non-conforming use: o Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district'/. too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil too small ~ drainage ~,~0 existing situation too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: (Rev. 1218/95) Variance Application, P. 3 Case No. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ~. If yes, explain: Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No frO. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No ~. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Applicant's Signa~~~Q~ ~' 3~ ~3 (Rev. 1218~05) Date Date 25 September, 1996 John Ned Dow Lot '12, Block 33, Wychwood 4994 Manchester Road Mound, MN 55364-9198 Ed Shukle, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle: Please note the application for variance I have submitted. I would appreciate this being handled in the most expeditious manner possible. I was surprised to find out when I went to apply for a building permit that my variance had expired! At issue originally were the setbacks for my undersize lot. The foundation was promptly moved to reflect future planned expansion of my house. The sidewalks, driveway, patio, landscaping and fences were installed and signed off by the previous building inspector, "Jan". Forces which have delayed progress on my remodeling have been economical, parental, community, and military! I am hoping fair play applies here and I might pick up where I left off! Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, ._hfi Ned Dow CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS [PROPERTY ADDRESS: /_/~C//'/~A~J~_~_~L_L~~ ~ OWNER'S NAME: \ IC~F,~ ~ '~' /~/X~.. A '~' LOT AREA 47~ LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .............. SQ. FT. X(~ = (for Lots of Record*) ....... SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) tl +Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques .are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225,Subd. 6. B. 1. (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE L~-'~' ..~ X X = DETACHED BLDGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover OTHER TOTAL HOUSE X = X = TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS ................. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .................. X = X X = TOTAL DECK .......................... X = TOTAL OTHER ......................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE UNDER ~ (indicate difference) ............................... PREPARED B ~ DATE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR JOHN NED DOW LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA C I hereby certi, fy that this is a true and a correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 12, Block 33, WYCHWOOD, and the location of ill existings buildings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments. Scale: 1" : 30' Date : 4-16-87 o : Iron marker ~g~: Spot elevation Datum: Mean Sea Level COFFIN & GRONBERG, INC. Mark S. Gronberg Lic. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota ! J ,L, ii, 124 July 24, 1990 RESOLUTION 90 -79 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A LOT SIZE VARIANCE FOR LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWO00, PID t24-117-24 42 0005 (4994 MANCHESTER ROAO}, P & Z CASE NO. 87-653. WHEREAS, J. Ned Dow, owner of the property with a total area of 4,700 square feet has requested a variance in lot size to add an two story addition of 6.5 feet. to the south of his property and construct a new deck on the prope?ty, all with conforming setbacks to the property line under the provisions of the Mound Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, The subject property is located in the R-2 Single Family Zoning District which requires 6,000 square feet of lot area, a 6 foot interior side yard setback and a 10 foot side yard setback abutting the Manchester right-of-way, a 20 foot front yard setback to Cambridge, a 15 foot rear yard setback to the west with a 10 foot deck setback; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend' approval of the lot size variance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: That the City does heFeby authorize the 1,300 square foot lot size variance td allow construction of a two story addition with conforming setbacks for the property located at 4994 Manchester, PID #24-117-24 42 0005. The City Council approves the lot size variance and authorizes the alteration set forth below pursuant to 23.404, Subdivision (B} with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404 of the Mound Code of Ordinances. e It is determined that the livability of the residential unit will be improved by authorizing the following alterations to a nonconforming use property due to the size of the parcel: A two story addition and deck as shown on Exhibit A. 125 July 24, 1990 This variance is described property: 117-24 42 0005. granted for the following legally Lot 12, Block 33, Wychwood, PID d24- This variance shall be recorded with the County RecorUer. with the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, Section 462.3595, Subdivision (4). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recqrding. Proof of recording shall be filed with the City Clerk prior to issuance of a building permit. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jensen and seconded by Councilmember Jessen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Ma~or Attest: City Clerk 126 July 24, 1990 193 July 28, 1987 RESOLUTION 87- 141 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A LOT SIZE VARIANCE FOR LOT 12, BLOCK 33, WYCHWOOD: PID #24-117-24h20005 (4~h Manchester Road) P & Z COMMISSION CASE 87-653 · . WHEREAS, J. Ned Dow, owner of the property has requested a variance in lot size to add an addition Of 6.5 feet to the South of his property and construct a new deck on his property all with.conforming setbacks to the-property line under the provisions of the zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the R2 zoning distr'ict requires a 6 foot interior side yard and'a 'lO foot side.yard abutting the Manchester right-of-way, the 20 foot fr°nt yard setback to Cambridge, a 15 foot rear yard setback to the West wlth a lO foot setback to a deck; and WHEREAS,'the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend the lot size variance. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the lot size variance to build on the lot an addition with conforming zoning setbacks in the R2 zoning district for Lot 12-~ Block 33, Wychwood; PID # 24-117-24420005 {4~4 Manchester Road} The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Abel and seconded by Councilmember Jensen. .. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel~ Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following CouncJlmembers voted in the negative: none. Maydr v At. test: City Clerk BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 5341 CITY OF MOUND Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-0600 Fax: 472-0620 Business Name~ennant The applicant is: ~owner __contractor __tenant DESCRIP~ON Subdivision i OWNER Name Address CON~CTOR Name ~cense Address Phone (H) (W) (M) ARCHI~CT Name~ ~ ~~~ &/OR Address~/~ ~l~/~ ~~ ~l~J~,, ~,~ ~--~'~ ENGIN~ Phone (H) (W) , CHANGE OF FRO~: USE TO: VALUE APPROVED: SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. PERMITS BECOME NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENDED W~THIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. T~ME LIMITS ON BUILDING COMPLETION. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED PURSUANT TO A BUiLDiNG PERMIT OBTAIN ED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. REPAIRS, REMODELING, AND ALTERATIONS TO THE EXTEt~IORS DP ANY BUlLDIN~e OR STRUCTURE iN ANY ZONING DISTRICT SHALL BE COMPLETED W1THIN ONE (1) YEAR F~OM THE DATE OF PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE PERSON OBTAINING THE PERMIT AND THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETION. A VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE IS A MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY EXTEND THE TIME FOR COMPLETION UPON WRIT'TEN REQUEST OF THE PERMITTEE, ESTABLISHING TO THE REASONABLE SATISFACTION OF THE CI'~' COUNCIL THAT CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE PERMITTEE PREVENTED COMPLETION OF THE WORK FOR WHICH THE PERMIT WAS GRANTED. THE EXTENSION SHALL BE REQUESTED NOT LESS THAN THIRTY {30l BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE END OF THE ONE-YEAR PERIOD. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK W1LL BE COMPLIED WiTH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lib////IIIIIIII//IIIIIIlII/,Z////Z/!II,/ZI/~IIh~ IIIIIIIIII .> ~.[~,i , FFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDIT, NS_ & _60MMEN~TS:_,-'~- ~ u~ ~L,, ..tv ....... ~ ,, V ~ ~/~ ECON~TRCON~TRUC~ON ~P~: ' i OCCUP~CY GROUP/DIV: M~OCCUPANTLO~ / I . j. . I RL~'~VEJ~'~Y I DATE: /"-, i "", B/', ¢ ;", ,:¢' ~, PI.,ANS CHECKED BY: YES I NO IPUBLIC WORKS N~PROVED BY !DATE: I ASSESSING ADDRESS: LOT OF RECORD? ~ NO YARD IlOU,RE ......... CITY OF MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SHEET ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: RI 10,000/60 B1 7,500/0 ~R~-~ 6,000/40'~B2 20,000/80 ~2 6,000/40 B3 10,000/60 R2 14,000/80 R3 SEE ORD. I1 30,000/100 REQUIRED ] EXISTING/PROPOSED EXISTING LOT SIZE: o LOT D~TH: . VARIANCE REAR LAKE TOP OF BLUFF GARAGE, ,RILED ..... FRONT FRONT 'RIDE 'RIDE REAR LAKE N 'R E W OR OTIIER DETACIlED N 'R E W N S E W N ,R E W N S E W N S E W N S E W 2.0 4' OR 6' 4' OR 6' TOP OF BLUFF ~ 30' This Z.ning Information 'Rhee! only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For furlher information, contact the City of Mound .PiRnning Department at 472-0600. PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner ~ DATE: July 2, 1990 SUBJECT: Variance Clarification APPLICANT: J. Ned Dow CASE NUMBER: 87-653 VHS FILE NUMBER: 90-310-A22-ZO LOCATION: 4994 Manchester Road EXISTING ZONING: Single-Family Residential (R-2) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND: In 1987, Mr. Dow received ,variance approval to construct an addition along the south side of his property. Since that time, only the foundation of the structure has been built. He is now seeking a clarification as to whether the approval was for a single story addition or for a two story addition. His desire is to construct a two story addition from the new south wall of the home to the mid-point of the existing structure. COMMENT: In reviewing this case, the minutes from the meeting seem to imply that the approval was for a single story addition. At the Planning Commission meeting of July 13, 1987, Mr. Dow stated that "his home is too small to add a second floor; the first floor would be ruined." Resolution 87-141 which was adopted at the time makes no mention of a seconQ floor. Based on this information, this case becomes a request for a new variance, not a clarification of what happened in 1987. The ~xisting lot has a total area of 4700 square feet. Including the footprint of the new adQition, the house, garage and deck consume 62% of the lot area. The seconO floor a~d~tion will not add to the building coverage on the lot since is lies above either existing portions of the home or the addition approved in 1987. 3030 Harbor Lane North Etdg.ll. Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 55447-2175 612/553-1950 Dow Planning Report July 2, 1990 Page two R£COMMENDATION: The proposed second story portion of the home is along the south side of the lot which has a conforming setback from Manchester. Since the second story wall in this area will have a conforming setback and the addition will not increase the building coverage on the lot, approval of the variance is recommended. If decking is part of the new addition, it should be required to observe the required 10 foot setback from the rear property line. DOW.P51 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 MEMORANDUM November 13, 1997 TO: FROM: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: PROPOSED INTERIM ORDINANCE REGULATING TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION FACILITIES OF COMMERCIAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES You may be aware that this subject has been discussed around the metropolitan area in a number of cities. Many cities have adopted an interim ordinance calling for a short moratorium to study the issue and develop recommendations on how to deal with the requests that are initiated by Personal Communication Services (PCS) companies such as US West, MCI, Sprint, etc. Our city planner's office has been contacted by US West Cellular regarding the availability of water towers or other sites/facilities to locate antennas for this type of equipment. We have been advised by the City Attorney's office to consider an interim ordinance which will give us some time to study what facilities might be available, franchise agreements if the company wishes to utilize existing water tower facilities, etc. Zoning issues, as well, need to be considered in developing a longer term ordinance to handle the various requests that will be coming in from the service providers. Staff recommends that you approve the interim ordinance amendment and that staff would then proceed to study the matter and bring you back an ordinance for consideration in the near future. If you have any questions, please contact me. prlnled on recycled paper CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax e-mail: attys@kennedy-graven.com RECEiVE DANIEL J. GREENSWEIG Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9231 November 4, 1997 Edward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1687 RE: Teleconlmunications Moratorium Dear Ed: Enclosed is a draft moratorium on PCS devices. The moratorium should be generally self- explanatory, but please keep two points in mind. First, the draft proposes a 90-day moratorium. While state law permits longer interim ordinances, federal law preempts anything but "reasonable" local regulation. In light of the current regulatory environment, the city will be at some risk if it attempts to stretch this moratorium much past 3 months. Second, the city does have an ordinance (Section 617) that requires permits for installation of these facilities on public ground. Because the city is considering a more comprehensive ordinance, it may be useful to also impose a moratorium on public-land installations. Doing so additionally reduces the risk that the moratorium will otherwise be claimed an impermissible attempt to force telecommunications providers to enter into lease agreements with the city. Several other considerations should form a part of the city's deliberations over a permanent ordinance. First, the city will need to determine when towers should be permitted uses, when conditional uses, and when prohibited uses. The general rule of thumb is that the city cannot prohibit the provision of telecommunication services or unreasonably interfere with their provision. Within that context, however, the city has a fair amount of flexibility in how to regulate these towers. There may also be ways to encourage location of towers on public property, for example by eliminating site plan approval for such towers on the basis that the city needs less time to review an application to operate a tower on land that the city owns and operates. DJG132953 MU200-1 Edward Shukle November 4, 1997 Page 2 Second, the city will need to consider whether and how to limit the height of these towers. At least one telecommunications company has vigorously complained about an ordinance that proposed a height limit of less than 175 feet, arguing that it rendered it difficult to provide adequately provide services. Third, the city will need to consider whether a public hearing will be a part of the approval process for towers that are otherwise permitted uses. There are, of course, both advantages and disadvantages to allowing public participation in a permit process in which the city has relatively little leeway to deny a permit. As I mentioned on the telephone, I have found that having a telecommunications provider representative at the planning commission and city council hearings on a permanent ordinance can serve to answer many of the technical questions that almost invariably arise during this process. Perhaps not surprisingly, these representatives will generally try to influence the direction of the ordinance and their comments should be heard with that in mind. Nevertheless, helping to ensure that a full and complete record exists will generally be of great assistance to the city if the ordinance should later face legal challenge. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need additional assistance. I believe that your planners had some sample permanent ordinances for your review, but I will be happy to provide you other examples if that would be helpful. cc: Mark Koegler DJG132953 l~U200-1 CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. AN INTERIM ORDINANCE REGULATING TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION FACILITIES OF COMMERCIAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM; AND DIRECTING A STUDY BE CONDUCTED THEREON The City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. Background. 1.01. The City of Mound ("City") currently regulates various types of wireless transmission and reception facilities through its official controls. 1.02. Among the facilities that are currently subject to regulation are antennas and towers having a fixed location and operated to furnish to the public commercial wireless telecommunication services (hereinafter "CWTS"), including cellular, personal communication services (PCS), specialized mobilized radio (SMR), enhanced specialized mobilized radio (ESMR), paging, and similar services that are marketed to the public. 1.03. Market demand, rapid advances in technology and expanding federal licensure of radio frequencies has resulted in the proliferation of CWTS in the recent past, and that trend can be expected to accelerate in the reasonably foreseeable future. 1.04. The City's regulation of antenna and tower transmission facilities, such as height and building size restrictions, fails to differentiate among the various types of facilities including CWTS. 1.05. The City Council is concerned that its official controls relating to antennas and towers may not adequately address issues related to these towers, such as the appropriate locations for the towers and the conditions under which they may be allowed within the City, including structural and construction requirements, collocation, setbacks, and height limitations. 1.06. The City has received inquiries from companies desiring to construct CWTS towers and other facilities in the City. 1.07. Minnesota Statutes, section 462.355, subdivision 4, allows the City to adopt an interim ordinance for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. t013 DJG132877 MU200-1 Section 2. Findings. 2.01. The City Council finds that it is necessary to conduct studies to determine if there is a need to amend the City's official controls or its comprehensive plan relating to CWTS's, and if so, to adopt the appropriate amendments. 2.02. The City Council finds that there is a need to adopt an interim moratorium ordinance for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens regarding such matters. Section 3. Planning and Zoning Study; Moratorium 3.01. A study is authorized to be conducted by City staff to determine if the City's official controls need to be modified as they relate to CWTS's. 3.02. Pending completion of the study and adoption of any amendments to the City's official controls, there is hereby established a moratorium on the construction, erection, placement, reconstruction, enlargement, or expansion of CWTS towers within the City and on the development and use of property for such purposes. 3.03. During the period of the moratorium, applications for final site and building plan approval, building permits, and other permits and approvals related to such tower work shall not be accepted by the City; neither the Planning Commission nor the City Council shall consider or grant approval of any application for such work; and no building permits for such work shall be issued. 3.04. For the purposes of the moratorium, the term "CWTS tower" shall mean any pole, spire, structure, or combination thereof, including supporting lines, cables, wires, braces, and masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna or similar apparatus above grade, for the purpose of providing commercial wireless telecommunication services to the public. 3.05. The moratorium shall not apply to: (a) the lawful use of existing towers; (b) the repair and/or maintenance of any existing tower provided that such work does not enlarge or expand that tower; (c) work on a tower necessary to preserve health, safety, life, or property in the face of an emergency; or (d) tower work that has received all necessary permits and approvals from the City prior to the effective date of this ordinance. Section 4. Enforcement. The City may enforce this ordinance by mandamus, injunction or other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 5. Duration. This ordinance shall remain in effect for 90 days from the date of its effective date or until such earlier time as said ordinance shall be revoked or otherwise amended. Sec. 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect the day after the date of its publication. DJG132877 MU200-1 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this ~ day of , 1997. DJG132877 MU200-1 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue Nodh, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447-4739 Telephone 612/476-6010 612/476-8532 FAX Engineers Planners Surveyors November 7, 1997 Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound Sherwood Drive Reconstruction Final Payment Request MFRA #11417 Dear Ed: Enclosed is Buffalo Bituminous' Final Payment Request for the subject project. The amount of this request is $1,800.92, which is the 5% retainage from the payment made in September. We have reviewed the project and find that the work was completed in general accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation that the Contractor be paid in full for this project. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. / John Cameron, City Engineer Enclosure e:main: 11417:finalpay An Equal Opportunity Employer o, oo - 0000000000000000 8888888888888888 8 dddddddddddddddd d 8-,o z~z ~8~ Z~ Nov, 13. 1997 2'28PM MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS No. 4987 P. 3/6 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, MN 55447 Telephone 612/476-6010 61 ?./476-8532 FAX Engineers Planners Surveyors November13,1997 Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 May'wood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBIECT: City ofMound Audito~RoadBuilding Demolition SAP145-108-04 MFRA#9968 Dear Ed: Enclosed is JME's Payment Request No. I for work completed through November 11, 1997 on the subject project. The amount of th/s payment request is $42,764.25. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron, City Engineer JC:pry Enclosure c:~nain:L~9$8~huk 1113 An Equal Opportunity F-ml:~yer Nov. 13. 1997 2:28PM MOCOMBS FRANK ROOS No. 498? P. m,m Nov. 13, 1997 2'28PM MCCOMBS ~RANK ROOS ;~°°°o°g.~. m O~mZ No. 4987 P, 5/6 Nov. 13, 1997 2:28PM MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS No. 4987 P. BILLS -November 18, 1997 Batch Batch 7103 7114 Total Bills $127,086.96 199,872.69 $326,959.65 Il J I o' o'o 8 rx.i ~¥ '1 0000~0 ,-4 x % o~ ! ? TTT °° [] J z 1 ? 0 I C~ ~fo31 Z II1 ~ I z ~ , 0 go° ,; .-;44 ._1 Z ZZ~ o~ ,,,1o ~Z ! O, i ! Z ~- z 7 uo Z n~ Z IIi ~ I i ','Z °? og Z Q~ o - L z CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 MEMORANDUM November 13, 1997 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER (,,.,.... }.~ ,k REQUEST FROM CITY OF MINNETRISTA REGARDING REVISION TO FIRE DISTRICT Attached is a request from the City of Minnetrista to add some Minnetrista properties to the fire district covered by the City of Mound Fire Department. This request was initiated by Minnetrista earlier this year and has been reviewed by the City of St. Bonifacius and its Fire Department which currently covers these areas in Minnetrista. The request also affects a small portion of Minnetrista which is currently covered by the Mound Fire Department which would now be covered by the St. Bonifacius Fire Department. The City of Minnetrista approved the revisions at their meeting of October 20, 1997. The City of St. Bonifacius, which has agreed to these changes, has sent a letter to Minnetrista asking them to delay the change until 1999 due to budgetary constraints. Minnetrista will review this issue at its meeting of November 17, 1997 and will have a representative at our City Council meeting on November 18, 1997. Fire Chief Steve Erickson has been involved in the process and is in agreement to accept the revisions as proposed. I see no reason to reject the proposed revisions. The areas mentioned are covered now through mutual aid agreements and if approved, will shift the financial burden to Minnetrista and will reduce the burden to the rest of the cities in the fire district which includes parts ofMinnetrista, Orono and Shorewood, all of Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach and Mound. Attached is a proposed 1998 Budget Breakdown showing the differences in cost between what has already been sent to the fire district cities and what the budget would look like based upon the proposed revisions. printed on recycled paper Memorandum to Mayor and City Council November 13, 1997 Page 2 A resolution is attached for your approval. If you have any questions, please contact me. RESOLUTION 97- RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE CITY OF MOUND'S FIRE DISTRICT AFFECTING THE CITY OF MINNETRISTA AND THE CITY OF ST. BONIFACIUS AS IT RELATES TO FIRE COVERAGE BY THE MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE ST. BONIFACIUS FIRE DEPARTMENT EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,199~ WHEREAS, the City of Mound has received a request from the City of Minnetrista to revise the Mound Fire Department Fire District to include additional properties in Minnetrista; and WHEREAS, a committee was established earlier this year to study this matter comprised of representatives from the cities of Minnetrista, St. Bonifacius and Mound; and WHEREAS, agreement was reached between the cities of Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius to revise the fire coverage area requesting the Mound Fire Department to assume responsibility for: County Road 44-Change from St. Bonifacius Fire Coverage to Mound Fire Coverage; all properties on County Road 44 from the south side of the Priests Bay/Halstead Bay Bridge south to 3790 County Road 44, Pine Circle, LythrumWay, Hardscrabble and Road and Eagle Bluff Road. County Road 110 West-Change from St. Bonifacius Fire Coverage to Mound Fire Coverage; all properties on County Road 110 West from the Mound City Limits westerly to Cardinal Cove Drive. Change from Mound Fire Coverage to St. Bonifacius Fire Coverage 7210 County Road 110 West Extension. WHEREAS, the Mound Fire Chief has participated in the discussions related to these proposed revisions and has approved of the changes as outlined above; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound and the remaining member cities of the Mound Fire District have no objection to these changes and that such changes will actually benefit the Mound Fire District particularly as it relates to financial considerations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby approves of the proposed changes as outlined above effective January 1, 1998. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to execute such documents related to these changes and that city staff prepare an addendum to be distributed to the member cities of the Fire District indicating these changes and the impact financially on the other members effective January 1, 199g. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MINNETONKA BEACH MINNETRISTA ORONO SHOREWOOD SPRING PARK MOUND 1998 BUDGET BREAKDOWN RELIEF FIRE (New) (Old) DEPT ASSN TRUCK 1998 1998 BUDGET CONT REPAIR COST COST 19416 5431 1764 26611 27387 48184 13477 4377 66038 57392 60107 16811 5461 82379 84654 5556 1554 505 7614 7818 32868 9193 2986 45047 45861 164089 45894 14907 224891 229469 330220 92360 30000 452580 452581 Diff. -776 8646 -2275 -204 -814 -4578 0 CITY OF ST. BONIFACIUS Office of the Clerk-Treasurer 8535 Kennedy Memorial Drive St. Bonifacius, MN 55375 612/446-1061 November 6, 1997 City of Mound Mayor Robert Polston 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN. 55364 Mayor Robert Polston; Please share this letter meeting. Thank you. Res~ctfully, Brenda Fisk City Clerk with your Council Members at your next CITY OF ST. BONIFACIUS Office of the Clerk-Treasurer 8655 Kennedy Memorial Drive P. O, Box 268 St. Bonifacius, MN 55375-0268 612/446-1061 November 6, 1997 Charlotte Erickson City Administrator City of Minnetrista 7701 County Road 110 West Minnetrista, MN 55364 RE: Fire Contracts Dear Ms. Erickson: We have received and reviewed your letter of October 23, 1997 concerning the adjustment of the fire district protection areas. The City of St. Bonifacius does not necessarily disagree with changing the boundaries as outlined in Minnetrista Resolution No. 108-97. However, the timing of Minnetrista adopting this resolution is problematic not only for the City of St. Bonifacius, but also. for Laketown and Watertown Townships in terms of allocation of costs for the 1998 fire protection year. Obviously, all of the parties to the Fire Protection Contract have set their budgets and levies for 1998. Based on current contract dollars, the boundary change Minnetrista is proposing would have the tbllowing impact for the contract participants in 1998: St. Bonifacius increase Minnetrista decrease Watertown increase Laketown increase $3,641.37 $5,997.55 $1,070.99 $1,285.19 The increase will have to be absorbed by the City of St. Bonifacius and Watertown and Laketown Townships without the benefit of budgeting for such a payment. That is an issue of some concern for the City of St. Bonifacius but we are particularly cognizant of how the townships Will react to what they will deem a very significant increase in their fire protection costs. Accordingly, St. Bonifacius feels one of the following two alternatives is appropriate: The boundaries be adjusted effective January 1, 1998 (concurrent with the execution of the new Fire Protection Contract) but ~3 rider be attached to the contract indicating that Minnetrista will pay the additional sum of $5,997.55 in 1998; or Charlotte Erickson November 6, 1997 Page 2 o The boundary changes be made effective January 1, 1999 thus affording all effected participants to the Fire Protection Contract the opportunity, to adequately budget for the change in boundaries. Please review this matter with your counsel and let me know how they wish to proceed. We will consider this matter at our council meeting scheduled for November 25, 1997. It would be most appreciated if your council could consider this issue at their council meeting scheduled for November 17, 1997. Respectfully yours, Brenda Fisk City Clerk RECEi!, ,3 2 4 ID{IL Edward Shukle, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364 Municipal Offices 7701 County Road 110 West Minnetrista, MN 55364-9552 October 23, 1997 Dear Ed: Enclosed is our resolution approving the revision of fire districts in the City by Minnetrista City Council. It is hoped that Mound City Council is able to take action on the revision as described in the resolution and indicated on the maps, at one of the regular November meetings. Councilmember Brad Gerdes would be happy to attend the meeting and explain the process leading up to this request. Thank you for your' cooperation in this matter. We have also appreciated the assistance giw:n by Chief Steve Erickson. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Charlotte Erickson Administrator Enclosure c: Steve Erickson, Fire Chief OFFICE 612-446-1660 ~' FAX 612-446-1311 RESOLUTION NO. ].08-97 RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISIONS OF FIRE COVERAGE DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF M1NNETRISTA AND REQUESTING THAT CITIES OF MOUND AND ST. BONIFACIUS APPROVE SUCH REVISIONS WHEREAS, the City of Minnetrista is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Minnetrista pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 412, has within its power to provide for the protection of public and private property and promote health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council, has pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 412, the authority to make contracts that are deemed necessary to effectively carry out the power granted by the statutes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has entered into fire contract agreements with the Cities of Maple Plain, Mound and St. Bonifacius in order to provide fire protection of public and private property and has approved three fire coverage districts in the city; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a report dated September 11, 1997, from Councilmember Brad Gerdes, that the Maple Plain Fire Chief, Mound Fire Chief and the St. Bonifacius Fire Chief and Councilmember Gerdes met during the summer of 1997 to discuss the various fire coverage districts and studied response times to each property in the City of Minnetrista; and WHEREAS, the Fire Chiefs agreed that the Maple Plain Fire Coverage District shall remain the same and that the St. Bonifac~Ls ~,qd the Mound Fire Coverage Districts, should be revised, as per the aforementioned report; and WHEREAS, all property owners affected by the revisions have been notified and given the opportunity to comment on the proposed revisions at a public hearing held October 6, 1997 before the Minnetrista City Council and the comments received were favorable to the changes. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MINNETRISTA, that the following revisions to the fire coverage districts be approved as follows and as per the attached Exhibits "A" ," B"," C". Resolution No. 108-97 Fire Coverage District Revisions County Road 44 - Change from St. Bonifacius Fire Coverage to Mound Fire Coverage; all properties on County Road 44 from the south side of the Priests Bay/Halsted Bay Bridge south to 3790 County Road 44, Pine Circle, Lythrum Way, Hardscrabble Circle and Road and Eagle Bluff Road. County Road 110 West - Change from St. Bonifacius Fire Coverage to Mound Fire Coverage; all properties on County Road 110 West from the Mound City Limits westerly to Cardinal Cove Drive. Change from Mound Fire Coverage to St. Bonifac:us Fire Coverage 7210 County Road 110 West Extension. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Minnetrista City Council requests that the City Councils of Mound and St. Bonifacius agree to and approve the stated revisions and that the revised fire coverage districts be effective January 1, 1998. This resolution approved this 20"' day of October 1997, by a vote of 0 Nays. Ayes and ATTEST: Edward Gale, Mayor C~arlotte Frickson, Administrator/Clerk ceunty Rom~ ~4 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR OCTOBER FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT Investment Activity Balance: Bou,qht: October 1, 1997 $3,915,415 Money Market 4M Plus 3,035 Money Market First Bank 50,377 CP Norwest 5.49% 114,673 CP Smith Barney 5.726% 339,263 Matured: Money Market First Bank (171,000) Money Market 4M Plus (40,000) CP Smith Barney 5.776% (334,235) October 31, 1997 Balance: $3,877,528 - 1997 North Central Public Finance Symposium Springsted and the Bond Buyer, in conjunction with the Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association, sponsored a Public Finance Symposium on Oct. 22nd. Topics covered were: - Privatization of public services - pro's and con's - New approaches to capital finance - bonds and beyond - Panel discussion among municipal underwriters and institutional investors - Panel of individuals who determine credit ratings - Governmental Accountinq and Auditinq Conference The Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants sponsored their annual conference for city officials and auditors of city finances on October 27th. The presentation on Audits of Federal Programs was very pertinent because new standards will be implemented with the 1997 city audit. The Governmental Accounting Standard Board update dealt with topics that could have significant impact in the way cities report financial matters. - SAC rate will be $1,000 in 1998 The Metro Council - Environmental Services has established the 1998 SAC rates. SAC is collected as users connect to the Metropolitan Disposal System for the first time. The SAC funds collected pay for the reserve capacity portion of the debt service incurred to expand and improve sewer facilities. The new rate of $1,000 represent an increase of six percent. - 1998 Proposed Tax Rates My preliminary calculation of the 1998 proposed property tax levy seems to indicate that the City of Mound's proration of the levy will be 3.64% less on a $100,000 valued home. The calculation implies that all other factors would stay the same. CiTY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 DATE: TO: FROM: RE: November 3, 1997 MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL And CITY MANAGER JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER OCTOBER 1997 MONTHLY REPORT The month of October found Wall Street in a very nervous condition. The stock market plummeted severely on bad news from overseas. However, here in Mound, particularly at your local liquor store, the economic atmosphere was bucking the World Wide pessimistic trend. Perhaps they needed a few bumps to soften the blow. Who knows. There always seems to be a reason why people choose to drink. Well here are the particulars: Gross sales for the month of October were; $144,102.00. Last year for October sales were $134,172.00. Up 7.5 %. Having Halloween fall on Friday helped immensely. Normally this time of the year sales for a Friday are around $7,500.00 this Halloween sales were $10,460.00. For the year sales are up $13,000.00 over last year at this same time. I hope to match, in November, what we did last year for November. That was a good November last year. Then I hope to be up a couple of thousand in December. The increase at the end of the year will not be that much. The good news is that at least it will be on the plus side. From what I hear, other stores are moaning and groaning. JK:jr prmted on recycled paper MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ~OUND, MINNESOTA FOR MONTH OF OCTO]~Rm-1997 FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE I ,TF~F ArC, SEN × X 2 19.OO 2.5 5] 6.50 331.50 2 GREG A~ gAN X X 2 lq.~ 2 51 6.50 3.31.50 3 P.A!~. R~RR X X 2 lq.OD 4.5 a& 6.50 299.Q0 ~ DAVID N~ X X 2 lq.~ 3 26 6.50 169.OO 5 SCOTT BRYCE X X 2 lq. OD 2 27 6.50 6 ~z}~ cs~ x x~ ~ N.~ ~.~ z6 6.50 7 ST~ COLLINS X ~ P 1 9.50 2 28 6.50 182.00 8 BOB C~!'~ORD X X 2 19. ~ 6.5 }5 6.50 227.50 ~ P~C~Y ~{G~T X X 2 19.00 1 (H) 27 6.50 175.50 0 STEI~ ERICKSON X X 2 19.00 1 40 7. O0 280. O0 .t t)~Y G~Y X X 2 19.OO 2 35 6.50 227.50 .2 KNIN G~Y X X 2 19.O0 3.5 29 6.50 188.50 .4 CP~IG ~ERSn~ X /! P 1 9.50 5 22 6.50 143.O0 .5 p~g~, ~.y X ~ 1 9.50 5.5 24 6,50 156.00 ~6 ~ ~ES X~ 2 19.~ 3.5 35 6,50 227.50 .7 R~ ~Y~ X X 2 19.~ 3.5 34 6,~0 221.00 .8' JO~~ h~SON X X 2 19.~ 4 24 6,50 156.00 .9 J.~ON ~.~S X X 2 19.~ 7 35 6.50 227.50 ~0 .Jp~ ~S X .~'~ X 2 19.00 3.5 '36 6.50 234.00 ~1 J~.~S ~SON X X 2 19.00 1.5 25 6.50 162.50 ~2 ~T NICC~.~ X X ' 2 19.~ 2 26 6.50 '~ 169.OO Z3 G~ P~[ X X 2 19.~ 1 29 6.50 188.50 ~4 UTYE PALN X X 2 19.~ 4.5 35 ~. 6.'50 227.50 ~5 %IN P~'~ X X 2 19.00 4.5 25 6.50 162.50 ~6 GPgG PEDERSON _ X X 2 19.00 2 29 6.75 195.75 ~7 C~IS PO~ X X 2 19.~ 4.5 30 6.50 195.00 28 RIC]~D R~ERS X X 2 19.00 2.5 35 6.50 227.50 29 HZKE SAVAGE X X 2 19.00 .7~ (1H) S7 6.50 240.50 30 :~VZN $IPPREI,I, .R. X 2 19.~ 2 22 6.~0 143.00 .... 31 RON STALt;I%M{E~ X 1 9.50 2.5 26 6.50 169. O0 ~2 BRUCE SVQBQDA X X 2 19.~ 1 27 6.50 1~5.50 _ 33 ED V~ X X 2 19.~ 3.5 41 6.50 266.50 34 RICK WILLIamS X X 2 19.~ ~8~ .(S~) 33 6.50 214.50 {E_) X 1 9.50 5.5 31 6.50 201.50 TIM z6 ~E~ ~0~ x x 2 ~9.00 3 30 6.5o ~95.00 37 6.50 34 33 67 ~ 85 82.5 167.5 636.50 146 1142 ~ 7,450.25 167.5 ~lS 636.50 146 ~ 1,250.00 ~ 9,336.75 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT ~,~,'-Z~ OF OCTOBER 1997 MON~ MONTH TO DATE TO DATE ~©. O? C.~LLS ~5~ 70 652 658 ~ou.w~ ?1RE 18 20 ~88 t6o El,[ER GE1%L-'Y ] 5 17 186 '224 H!NNETONKA BEACH ,F.I RE O 2 17 7 EKERGENCY 0 1 ~. 11 MI N.NE-_ R ! STA .FIRE 3 ~ 42 45 ORO.NO _FIRE 6 ~ 55 53 KM]~RGENCf 6 '~ 31 32 - SZ-.'OE EWOOD .FIRE O 0 4 0 ~MERGE~ 0 0 2 3 SPRING PARK .FIRE 2 1 18 24 -- IP.[ERGE~;C'Y 4 6 59 61 ,c- 'u.~.. AID - 2 O. 8 5 I/fERGENCY 0 1 4 3 [CTAL FiRE CALLS 31 36 332 293 ]]~,z~.~ EMERGENCY CALLS 28 34 320 365 ~3.Si D -_--%'T_ LAL ~ 6 44 32 12~'DU $TRf'.~L 9 0 0 1 ~C-9.&SS & YJ-SC~LA~OUS ~ 14 160 120 · -',' 0 1 7 19 ?.]2.3E A~--qR.H / FIRE ALARMS 6 13 105 28 bP, O? HOURS FIRE 435 385._~ 4271 3619 -- - Y, OUND 'tl~GENUY 269 345 3453 4462 - TC~'AL 704 730 7724 8081 ~ 0 25 348 102 - M?KA BEACH ~ 0.___~ 1____~7 80 233 TOTAL 0 42 428 335 FZRE 34 85 979 980 Y,' TI I STA EMERGENCY 50 51 708 599 TOT. AL 84 136 1687 1579 FIRE 123 198 1348 1144 O?.ONO _L~ERGE~ 99 137 522 634 TO'~AL 222 335 1870 1778 FIRE 0 0 81 0 $:qOREW00D .~ZRCENC'Y 0 0 38 68 - _TOT~ 0 0 119 68 ,FIRE 21 18 371 401 - BP. PARK .EMERGEI~ 83 103 1081 1185 TOTAL 104 121 1452 1586 FIRE 28 0 224 116 - ~,~qU.~L ~2D EMERG~CY 0 18 80 84 TOTAL 28 18 304 200 ~C?~.L D!ILL HOURS 167.5 175 169~ 1750 TOTAL FIRE HOURS 641 7]l 7622 6362 T©ZAL EMERGENCY HOURS 50] 67] 5c~62 7265 ~ ...... & IF~:'RGENCY HOURS 1142 1382 13.584 13~627 .~,UTUAL AID RE,CEIVED 0 1 5 0 LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLIC 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Chief Len Harrell Monthly Report for October 1997 The police department responded to 1,321 calls for service during the month of October. There were 29 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 criminal sexual conduct, 7 burglaries, 1 aggravated assault, 19 larcenies, and 1 vehicle theft. There were 58 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses included 2 child abuse/neglect, 1 forgery/NSF checks, 7 weapons, 1 narcotics, 15 damage to property, 1 liquor law violation, 2 DUI's, 5 simple assaults, 6 domestics (4 with an assaults), 2 harassment's, 8 juvenile status offenses, and 8 other offenses. The patrol division issued 115 adult citations and 8 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 24 tickets. Warnings were issued to 90 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 2 adults and 5 juveniles arrested for felonies. adults and 18 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. additional 12 warrant arrests. There were 16 There were an The department assisted in 8 vehicle accidents, 2 with injuries. There were 30 medical emergencies and 83 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 18 occasions in October and requested assistance 11 times. Property valued at $8,568 was stolen and $3,798 was recovered in October. Il J I j al ,,l~ i J, , I&, ~1, MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - OCTOBER1997 II. INVESTIGATIONS The investigators worked on 4 child protection matters and one criminal sexual conduct case. Other cases involved burglary, theft, assault, terroristic threats, fleeing a police officer, discharge of a firearm, domestic assault, damage to property, felony assault, receiving stolen property, harassment, and absenting. Formal complaints were issued for felony theft, assault, fleeing a police officer, disorderly conduct, driving after cancellation, noise nuisance, maltreatment of an animal, assault, and alcohol in the park. III. Personnel/Staffin~ The department used approximately 46 hours of overtime during the month of October. Officers used 37 hours of comp-time, 81 hours of vacation, 19 hours of sick time, and 9.5 holidays. Officers earned 35 hours of comp time. Officers attended EMT refresher and mandatory training in legal updates and handling the mentally ill. Officer Ringate attended a week long course on drug interdiction for patrol officers. I attended the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference in Florida. I was a presenter for "Partnerships in Community Policing for Juveniles and Seniors." I attended several excellent seminars including: - Significant Employment Law Developments: How to Protect your Agency. - Recent Trends in Police Liability. - An Update on the First Amendment for Police Agencies. - The Supreme Court 1996-97 Term: Significant Decisions Affecting Law Enforcement. - Strengthening Ethics Within Your Department. - How Do I Get My First-Line Supervisors to be Leaders. - The Deadly Sins of Police Leadership. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - OCTOBER 1997 VI. - Police Leadership - Creating New Realities. - Assuring Accountability and Preserving Organizational Integrity. The reserves donated 105 hours during the month of October. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS Officers Packard and Piper addressed,~8 animal complaints, 22 ordinance violations, and 95 miscellaneous calls for service. 5 citations were given in October. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 1997 OFFENSES CLEARED EXCEPT- CLEARED BY ARRESTED REPORTED UNFOUNDED CLEARED ARREST ADULT JUV Homicide Criminal Sexual Conduct Robbery Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Vehicle Theft Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 7 0 0 1 0 3 19 1 0 2 2 1 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 29 2 0 4 2 5 PART II CRIMES Child Abuse/Neglect 2 Forgery/NSF Checks 1 Criminal Damage to Property 15 Weapons 7 Narcotic Laws 1 Liquor Laws 1 DWI 2 Simple Assault 5 Domestic Assault 4 Domestic (No Assault) 2 Harassment 2 Juvenile Status Offenses 8 Public Peace 0 Trespassing 1 Ail Other Offenses 7 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i i 2 0 0 2 i i 0 0 0 i 1 0 0 0 i i 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 i 1 1 0 1 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 8 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 2 TOTAL 58 2 7 26 16 18 PART II & PART IV Property Damage Accidents 6 Personal Injury Accidents 2 Fatal Accidents 0 Medicals 30 Animal Complaints 83 Mutual Aid 18 Other General Investigations 1.072 TOTAL 1,211 HCCP 3 Inspections 20 TOTAL 1,321 4 7 30 18 23 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT OCTOBER 1997 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY Hazardous Citations Non-Hazardous Citations Hazardous Warnings Non-Hazardous Warnings Verbal Warnings Parking Citations DWI Over .10 Propety Damage Accidents Personal Injury Accidents Fatal Accidents Adult Felony Arrests Adult Misdemeanor Arrests Juvenile Felony Arrests Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests Part I Offenses Part II Offenses Medicals Animal Complaints Ordinance Violations Other Public Contacts THIS MONTH 44 76 12 62 73 24 2 1 6 2 0 3 26 5 19 29 58 30 83 20 1,072 YEAR TO DATE 781 683 205 581 809 492 79 65 70 35 0 41 368 35 177 245 689 261 557 275 7,681 LAST YEAR TO DATE 831 474 263 653 902 466 67 5O 56 20 1 34 353 65 182 258 710 298 533 252 7,040 TOTAL Assists Follow-Ups HCCP Mutual Aid Given Mural Aid Requested 1,647 56 89 3 18 11 14,129 603 503 33 156 88 13,508 702 335 46 157 86 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 1997 DWI More Than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired or No Plates Stop Arm Violations Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Code Enforcement Seat Belt Overweight Vehicles Miscellaneous Tags TOTAL 2 1 1 4 1 29 2 1 41 0 3 1 3 0 2 0 0 24 3 9 2 2 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 1997 Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Window Tint Miscellaneous TOTAL WARRANT ARRESTE Felony Misdemeanor 3O 11 15 0 5 12 0 0 0 5 78 1 10 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12 LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle, City Ma./~ager .ifil Chief Len Harrell¢ November 13, 1997 Semaphore Request Information Attached are the statistics for traffic accidents in the three locations that you requested for information for the council. The statistics indicate that there were 21 accidents (four with injuries) in a four year period at Shoreline Drive and Wilshire Boulevard. Shoreline Drive and Cypress Lane experienced 15 accidents (eight with injuries) over the same period of time. The traffic volume for the Superamerica station may be a contributing factor as well as the crosswalk at Cypress Lane. The intersection of Three Points Boulevard and County Road 110 experienced nine accidents (four with injuries) for the same four year period. It does not appear that there have been any accidents since the installation of the semaphore at County Road 110 and Three Points Boulevard. A review of the statistics indicates that the volume of personal injury accidents is higher at Cypress Lane; where over 50% of the accidents involved an injury. The need may be greater at that intersection than at Wilshire. Another factor to consider is the closing of Toro and the volume of pedestrians may change depending on the building use. Please let me know if there are any other issues to be addressed. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Chief Len Harrell Shirley Hawks Traffic Accidents - January 1, 1994 through October 31, 1997 November 4, 1997 YE/LR SHORELINE DR. & WILSHIRE BLVD PERSONAL PROPERTY PEDESTRIAN INJIIRY DAMAGE INJURY TOTAL 1994 0 6 0 6 1995 1 6 0 7 1996 0 3 1 4 1997 2 2 0 4 TOTAL 3 17 i 21 COUNTY RD 110 & THREE POINTS BLVD 1994 2 1 0 3 1995 2 3 0 5 1996 0 1 0 1 1997 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 4 5 0 9 SHORELINE DRIVE & CYPRESS LANE TOTAL 7 7 i 15 1994 2 3 0 5 1995 1 0 0 1 1996 0 1 1 2 1997 4 3 0 7 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 October 29, 1997 Ms. Heidi Petty 4722 Gordon Road Mound, MN 55364 Re; Traffic Signal-County Road 15/Wilshire Blvd. Dear Ms. Petty: I have followed up on your request for a traffic signal at the above location. First, I have received a report from the Police Department, a copy of which is enclosed, indicating that there have been 21 accidents involving personal injury, property damage and pedestrian injuo' from 1994 to the present. Second, I contacted Hennepin County to determine the procedure in which to request a traffic signa! at this location. The County needs to have the City request a feasibility study of this location to determine if the traffic warrants a signal. Third, I asked the City Council to approve a resolution at its October 28, 1997 meeting asking for the feasibility study to be conducted. The City Council did not approve the resolution because they need more information about how the number of accidents that have occurred at this location compares to the number that occurred from 1994 up until the traffic signal was installed at Three Points and County Road 110. In addition, they want accident data regarding the County Road 15 and Cypress (Superamerica) location and how that compares to the County Road 15 and Wilshire Blvd. location. Following receipt of that information from the Police Department, the City Council will be scheduling a public hearing on the matter. That is tentatively scheduled for Tuesday. December 9, 1997, 7:30 p.m., Mound City Hall. Finally, I wanted to advise you of what has been done on your request to date and that you may want to consider circulating a petition to the public for the project and asking that the City Council pass a resolution asking Hennepin County to study the project's feasibility. You may also want to ask the persons who sign the petition to attend the public hearing to let the City Council know their views on this issue. prtnted on recycled paper Letter to Ms. Heidi Petty October 29, 1997 Page 2 I will advise you as to when I have received the data from the Police Department as requested by the City Council. If you have any questions, please contact me. ~~Ed, ar J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 MEMO TO: Ed Shukle FROM: Shirley SUBJECT: Traffic Accidents DATE: September 24, 1997 Following are the results of your inquiry regarding the number of traffic accidents occurring on Shoreline Drive and Wilshire Blvd. These statistics are for accidents reported to the Mound Police Department from 1994 through September 1997. PERSONAL PROPERTY PEDESTRIAN YEAR INJURY DAMAOE INJURY TOTAL 1994 0 6 0 6 1995 1 6 0 7 1996 0 3 1 4 1997 2 2 0 4 TOTAL 3 17 I 21 RESOLUTION 97- RESOLUTION REQUESTING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF LOCATING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT COUNTY ROAD 15 (SHORELINE DRIVE) AND WILSHIRE BLVD. IN THE CITY OF MOUND WHEREAS, the City of Mound is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is concerned with the health, safety and welfare of the City; and WHEREAS, traffic has increased on Hennepin County Road 15 and Wilshire Blvd; and WHEREAS, residents have asked for the City of Mound and Hennepin County to consider locating a traffic signal at this location to prevent accidents and relieve traffic congestion NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby requests a feasibility study of this intersection to determine if a traffic signal is warranted. The foregoing resolution was moved by , seconded by The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk CITY OF MOUND FQ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-o6o0 FAX (612) 472-0620 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 17, 1997 MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ KRIS LINQUIST, PLANNING SECRETARY ~, MEETING CANCELLATION - - NOVEMBER 24, 1997 The November 24th Planning Commission Workshop Meeting has been canceled. next meeting will be on December 8th. HAPPY THANKSGIVING Our cc: Ed Shukle, City Manager Jon Sutherland, Building Official Loren Gordon, Assistant City Planner John Cameron, City Engineer John Dean, City Attorney printed on recycled paper CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT OCT. 1997 83.33% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from Other Funds Charges to Other Departments OCT. 1997 BUDGET REVENUE 1,266,460 0 6,250 10 121,800 9,594 968,210 62,288 51,100 463 65,00O 7,74O 43,300 295 43,5O0 0 10,000 1,445 YTD REVENUE PERCENT VARIANCE RECEIVED 649,296 (617,164) 51.27% 4,392 (1,858) 70.27% 115,333 (6,467) 94.69% 592,714 (375,496) 61.22% 8,940 (42,160) 17.50% 93,301 28,301 143.54% 31,991 (11,309) 73.88% 0 (43,500) 0.00% 10,701 701 107.01% TOTAL REVENUE 2.575.620 81.835 1.506.668 (1,068.952) 58.50% FIRE FUND RECYCLING FUND LIQUOR FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCKS FUND 336,020 108,320 1,525,000 430,000 880,000 4,100 73,800 39,418 335,057 (963) 99.71% 8,478 106,146 (2,174) 97.99% 132,412 1,257,052 (267,948) 82.43% 33,101 356,447 (73,553) 82.89% 86,867 797,819 (82,181) 90.66% 0 2,145 (1,955) 52.32% 104 70,192 (3,608) 95.11% rev97 G.B. CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT OCT. 1997 83.33% OCT. 1997 YTD BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND Council 69,370 9,522 Promotions 4,000 0 Cable TV 800 887 City Manager/Clerk 193,470 16,267 Elections 2,100 0 Assessing 59,480 201 Finance 168,960 12,840 Computer 23,550 1,564 Legal 114,460 10,454 Police 924,350 74,694 Civil Defense 4,100 258 Pla n n ingll ns pectio ns 172,870 14,170 Streets 405,270 35,932 City Property 82,840 16,667 Parks 148,550 11,199 Summer Recreation 36,200 0 Contingencies 20,000 1,773 Transfers 161,390 12,869 69,472 4,000 1,413 156,456 1,857 61,419 132 660 15.399 77.297 709.632 2 155 141,372 339,819 69,200 124,492 0 23,037 128,692 VARIANCE PERCENT EXPENDED (102) 100.15% 0 100.00% (613) 176.63% 37,014 80.87% 243 88.43% (1,939) 103.26% 36,300 78.52% 8,151 65.39% 37,163 67.53% 214,718 76.77% 1,945 52.56% 31,498 81.78% 65,451 83.85% 13,640 83.53% 24,058 83.80% 36,200 0.00% (3,037) 115.19% 32,698 79.74% GENERALFUND TOTAL 2,591,760 219,297 2,058,372 533.388 79.42% Area Fire Service Fund 336,020 Recycling Fund 118,950 Liquor Fund 211,920 Water Fund 351,460 Sewer Fund 1,020,460 Cemetery Fund 8,100 Docks Fund 68,440 23,214 233,355 102,665 69.45% 9,160 119,997 (1,047) 100.88% 19,979 179,752 32,168 84.82% 61,446 332,802 18,658 94.69% 129,085 951,424 69,036 93.23% 539 7,742 358 95.58% 6,506 41,085 27,355 60.03% 11/14/1997 G.B. Run: 29-0ct-97 10:05 PR003 Primary ISN'S only: No Date Reported range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 ..... Activity codes: All ~operty Status: All Property Types: Ail Property Descs: Ail Brands: Ail Models: Ail Officers/Badges: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enf0rs Property Report STOLEN/RECOVERED BY DATE REPORTED Prop Prop Inc no ISN Pr Prop Date Rptd Stolen Date Recov'd Quantity Act ~ Desc SN Stat Stolen Value Recov'd Value Code B Prop type Totals: 276 25 3.000 D Prop type Totals: 547 150 7.000 E Prop type Totals: 18 0 2.000 G Prop type Totals: 225 0 1.000 H Prop type Totals: 200 0 1.000 J Prop type Totals: 650 0 1.000 M Prop type Totals: 25 0 1.000 Prop type Totals: 1,120 0 3.000 P Prop type Totals: 85 20 3.000 R Prop type Totals: 1,820 1,130 7.000 S Prop type Totals: 390 0 1.000 T Prop type Totals: 2,757 2,423 11.000 V Prop type Totals: 50 0 1.000 X Prop type Totals: 345 0 3.000 Y Prop type Totals: 60 50 6.000 **** Report Totals: 8,568 3,798 51.000 Brand Model Page 1 Off-1 Off-2 Assnd Assnd Run: 29-0ct~97 9:12 CFS08 Primary ISN's only: NO Date Reported range: 09/26/97 ~ 10/25/97 Tlme range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: All Activity Resulted: All Dispositions: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: All Patrol Areas: All Days of the week: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Calls For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY CODE ~ER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS 9000 SPEEDING 29 9002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 2 9003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 1 9005 J-RESTRICTED D/L 9012 OPEN BOTTLE 1 9014 STOP SIGN 3 9015 J-STOP SIGN 2 9016 FAILURE TO YIELD 1 9018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 3 9019 J-EQIPMENT VIOLATION 1 9021 J-CARELESS/RECKLESS 1 9028 DRIVING ON PARK PROP. 2 9029 J-DRIVING ON PA~RK PROP. 9030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 3 9033 MV/ATV STREETS-PARKS 1 9038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC 1 9039 J-ALL OTHER TRAFFIC 2 9040 NO SEATBELT 2 9051 J ALLOWING INCOMPETENT TO DRV 1 9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 24 9200 DAS/DAR/DAC 4 9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED 41 Page Kun: 29-Cct-97 9:12 CFS08 Primary iSN's only: No ?a~e Reported range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 ~'~,range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Recezved: All Activity Resulted: All Dlspositions: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: All Patrol Areas: All Days cf the week: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Calls For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS 3 9220 NC INSURANCE/PROOF OF 2 9240 CF_ANGE OF DOMICILE 3 9300 LCST ARTICLES/OTHER 3 9301 LCST PERSONS 1 9312 FC'JND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 3 9313 FOUND PROPERTY 6 9430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS 2 ~50 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS 6 9561 DCG BITE 2 9563 DOG AT LARGE 1 9566 ~i,MAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 9 9567 DA_NGEROUS DOG 2 9700 MEDICAL/SU 1 9710 MED!CAL/ASU 3 9730 MEDICALS 23 9731 MEDICALS/DX 2 9732 MEDICALS/CI 1 9750 FIRES 1 9800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED -/"~' 1 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT 9900 ALL HCCP CASES 9904 OPEN DOOR/ALARMS Page ¥07O Run: 29-0ct-97 9:12 CF$08 Primary ISN's only: No Date Reported range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: All Activity Resulted: All Dispositions: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: All Patrol Areas: All Days of the week: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Calls For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS 9920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 2 9921 INSPECTIONS CITATION 2 9930 HANDGUN APPLICATION 8 9932 OFP VIO. CRIME CONTROL & LAW ENF ACT OF '94 1 9944 UNWANTED GUEST 1 9951 SEX OFFENDERS 1 9980 WA. RRA~TS 12 9991 J-MISC. VIOLATIONS 1 9992 MUTUAL AID/8100 11 9993 MUTUAL AID/6500 5 9994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER 2 A0034 ASLT-UNK DEGREE-UNK ACT-KNIFE ETC-CHLD-FAM 1 A2246 ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-POS FIREARM-UNBRN 1 A5352 ASLT 5~MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC A5355 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ 1 A5435 ASLT 5-FEAR BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-CHLD-ACQ 1 A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ 1 A9502 TERR THREATS-INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ 1 AK351 DOM ASLT-GM-HANDS FIST FEET-AD-FAM 1 AL351 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM 1 AL352 ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC 1 AL551 DOM ASLToMS-FEAR BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM 1 Page Run: 29-0c~-97 9:12 CFS08 Primary ISN's only: No Date Reported range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 ~ range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: All Activity Resulted: Ail Dispositions: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: Ail Patrol Areas: Ail Days of the week: Ail ACTIVITY CODE DESCRIPTION B1234 B2764 B3334 B3394 B3494 B4960 DA540 i3060 J2701 J2R01 J3501 J3E01 L7085 M3005 M4140 M5313 M5350 N3190 P3i10 P3310 BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-D-UN WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 2-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD TP~AFFIC-GM-AGG DUI-UNK INJ-MV TRAFF-GM-FAIL TO SUBMIT TO TEST-UNK INJ-MV TRAFF-ACClD-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE TP~AF-ACC-MS-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-MV CSC 4-UNK ACT-STRANGER-16-17-F JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO LIQUOR-UNDEP. AGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 JUVENILE-CURFEW JUVENILE-RUNAWAY DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARP~ASSING COMMUNICATIONS PROP DAMAGE-GM-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Calls For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 2 1 14 1 Page 4 Kun: 29-0ct-97 9:12 CFS08 Primary ISN's only: NO Date Reported range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 ilme range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: All Activity Resulted: All Dispositions: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: All Patrol Areas: All Days of the week: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Calls For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS P3600 LITTER-UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF G~RBAGE-MS 2 TC021 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY 1 TC029 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-OTH PROP 1 TC071 THEFT-501-2500-FE-BANK TYP INST-MONEY 1 TC159 THEFT-501-2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP 3 TE029 THEFT-OTHER-FE-BUILDING-OTH PROP 1 TF159 THEFT-201-500-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP 2 TF169 THEFT-201-500-GM-WATERCP. AFT-OTH PROP TG021 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-MONEY 3 TG159 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER 2 TG169 THEFT-LESS 200-MS-WATERCP. AFT-OTH PROP 2 U3028 THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLESS CHECK-200 OR LESS 1 U3498 THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS 2 VC021 VEH-NOT MORE 500-FE-THEFT-AUTO 1 WlE40 WEAPON-FE-RECK DISCH MLTNICIP-FIREARM-NO CH3%R 1 WlH4N WEAPON-FE-DRI%FE BY SHOOTING-AT OCC BUILDING 1 W3190 WEAPONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR 4 W3980 WEAPONS-MS-OTHER ACT-FIREWORKS-NO CHAR 1 X2200 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL 1 X3250 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-VIOL ORD PROTECTION 1 Page **** Report Totals: 344 Kun: 29-0ct-97 9:40 0FF01 Primary ISN's only: No Pale Repor[ed range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 .... ~range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Dispositions: All Activity codes: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page 1 ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL CODE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING A0034 A2246 A5352 A5355 A~435 A5502 A9502 AK351 AL352 AL551 B1234 B2764 B3334 B3394 B3494 B4960 DA540 E4700 13060 J2R01 J3501 ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED ASLT-UNK DEGREE-UNK ACT-KNIFE ETC-C~LD-FAM 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 i 100.0 ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-POS FIREARM-UNBRN 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 ! 100.0 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 ASLT 5-FEAR BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-CHLD-ACQ 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 i 100.0 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 TERR THREATS-INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 DOM ASLT-GM-HANDS FIST FEET-AD-FAM 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY N_~.RM-HANDS-~dD-FAM 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY biRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 100.0 DOM ASLT MS-FEAR BODILY HA_RM-HA/~DS-AD-FAM 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I 100.0 BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-D-UN WEAP-COM THEFT 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 BURG 2-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 i 100.0 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK 1 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 100.0 ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER 1 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 100.0 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 TP~AFFIC-GM-AGG DUI-UNK INJ-MV 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 i 100.0 TRAFF-GM-FAIL TO SUBMIT TO TEST-UNK INJ-MV 1 0 1 0 I 0 0 i 100.0 TRAFF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I 100.0 Run: 29-0ct-97 9:40 OFF01 Primary ISN's only: No Date Reported range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Dispositions: Ail Activity codes: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page 2 ..... OFFENSES CLEARED ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT CODE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING AR. REST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED TRAF~ACC-MS~AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-MV JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21 JUVENILE-CURFEW JUVENILE-RUNAWAY DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMI~JNICATIONS PROP DAMAGE-GM-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT PROP DAMAGE-MS~PRIVATE-UNK INTENT TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT LITTER-UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-OTH PROP THEFT-501-2500-FE-BIkNK TYP INST-MONEY THEFT 501~2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTB PROP THEFT-OTHER-FE-BUILDING-OTH PROP J3E01 M3005 M4140 M5313 M5350 N3190 P2130 P3110 P3310 P3600 TC021 TC029 TC071 TC159 TE029 TF159 THEFT-201-500-GM~MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP THEFT-201-500-GM-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP THEFT-LESS 200-MS-BUILDING-MONEY THEFT-LESS 200-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER THEFT-LESS 200-MS-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLESS CHECK-200 OR LESS THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS VEH-NOT MORE 500-FE-THEFT-AUTO TF169 TG021 TG159 TG169 U3028 U3498 VC021 I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 14 0 14 12 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0.0 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 50.0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Run: 29-0ct-97 9:40 OFF01 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Primary ISN's only: No Date Reported range: 09/26/97 - 10/25/97 T~-~ range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Dispositions: All Activity codes: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: Ail Enfors Offense Repor~ OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT J~NILE BY EX- PERCENT CODE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING AP. REST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED W1E40 WEAPON-FE-RECK DISCH ~gJNICIP-FIREARM-NO CN-~R 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 W1H4N WEAPON-FE~DRIVE BY SHOOTING-AT OCC BUILDING 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0~0 W3190 WEAPONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR 4 0 4 2 0 0 2 2 50,0 W3980 WEAPONS-MS-OTHER ACT-FIREWORKS-NO CHAR 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 X2200 CRIM AGNST kDM JUST-GM-GIVE FLSE NAM-POL 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 X3250 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-VIOL ORD PROTECTION 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 **** Report Totals: 84 4 80 43 16 14 7 37 46.2 CITY OF MOUND NOVEMBER 6, 1997 5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUN D, MINNESOTA 56364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PARKS; This time of the year we have completed preparing our equipment for the winter. Staff is down to one part-time called in as needed and will be given more hours when the weather turns colder to allow for ice rink flooding. CEMETERY; The cemetery had three burials and has been marked for winter burials. TREE REMOVAL; There was one hazardous tree marked on private property and we were working with the home owner for the removal. A large tree was removed from Devon Common that was struck by lighting. DOCKS; The dock inspector has been busy inspecting dock site locations for adherences to code for storage of docks and lifts. The city docks have been removed from the three sites and stored on site for the winter. printed on recycled paper CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUN D, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 5, 1997 City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff Jon Sutherland, Building Official ~ ° OCTOBER 1997 MONTHLY REPORT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY There were 52 building permits issued in October for a construction value of $ 262,345. We issued 54 plumbing, mechanical, and miscellaneous permits for a total of 106 this month, and 730 permits year-to-date. Total valuation now stands at $5,815,747. PLANNING & ZONING The Planning Commission reviewed eight cases and sent on six variances and two minor subdivision cases to the City Council. kl printed on recycled paper City of Mound BUII~,I)ING ACTIVITY IU~,I'ORT Month: OCTOBER Year: 1997 THIS M( ,v,u,v, n YI:AIt TO DATE RESIDENTIAL il..,# PERMITS J # 'U'N'I'T~I VALUATION SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 15 2,218,747 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED [CONDOS) 2 558,458 TWO FAMILY I DUPLEX 2 240,000 MULTIPLE FAMILY (3 OR MORE UNITS) TRANSIENT HSG. IHOTELS I MOTELS) BUBTOTAL 0 19 3, 017,205 NONRESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL {RETAIL/RESTAURANI} OFFICE I PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC / SCHOOLS SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING 0 33 622,172 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 4 32,405 20 238,941 DECKS 5 15,047 48 158,398 SWIMMING POOLS 0 2 17 ~ 499 REMODEL- MISC RESIDENTIAL 41 211,893 264 1,244,067 REMODEL- MULTIPLE DWELLINGS 0 SUBTOTAL 50 259,345 367 2,281,077 NON.RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANI } 1 100 OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL 1 3,000 5 89 ~ 365 INDUSTRIAL 1 1,000 PUBLIC I SCHOOLS 4 427~000 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS SUBTOTAL 11 517,465 RESIDENIIAL DWELLINGS ~ NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ] 4 TOTAL DEMOLITIONS i 9 # PERMITS # UNITS VALUATION // UNITS VALUATION 19 TOTAL . 52 262,345 406 5 t 815,747 PERMIT COUNT J THIS MONTH J YEAR-TO*DATE , [,,,,' BUILDING 5 2 4 0 6 FENCES & RETAINING WALLS 6 31 SIGNS 1 10 PLUMBING 17 122 MECHANICAL 22 120 GRADING 0 4 S&W, STREET EXCAV., FIRE, ETC. 8 37 TOTAL J 106 J 730 1997 BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY ,NTH YEAR DAY PERMIT ADDRESS OWNER CONTP3%CTOR TYPE OF CONST VALUTION SAC_UNIT OCT 97 1 12134 2725-2727 TYRONE LANE MN PLANNED INA;EST REROOF 4,500 OCT 97 1 12135 5942 GUMWOOD ROAD SANFORD ALTER R K ROOFING REROOF 1,720 OCT 97 2 12136 3057 INVERNESS LANE NORMAN BOHN DECK 1,547 OCT 97 2 12137 2949 OAKLAWN LANE BRET NICCUM FENCE OCT 97 3 12138 5749 GP. ANDVIEW BLVD DARRICK BRAKEMEIER OCT 97 3 12139 6240 LYNWOOD BLVD JOHN LUND STRUCT REPAIR 1,500 REMODEL 15,000 OCT 97 2 12140 6208 RED OAK RD MARLENE GRAHAM REROOF H & G 5, ooo ,~ OCT 97 3 12141 1645 EAGLE LANE NANCY PIELA REROOF OCT 97 3 12143 5448 SPRUCE ROAD RON R.HEINFIART REROOF 7o0 OCT 97 13 12144 2609 GROVE LANE DOUG BR. ANDT SUNINERS BLDG FINISH BASEMENT 22,000 ,, ~ OCT 97 7 12145 2116 GRA/qDVIEW CT KEN & LISA OVESON RIGHTWAY ROOFING REROOF 3,900 OCT 97 7 12146 OCT 97 6 12147 2860 PHEASANT CIRCLE 4559 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE KEITH BENEDICT KAY SALAZAR PANELCR.AFT RESIDE, WINDOWS,DOOR RETAINING WALL 19,877 4,000 /~" OCT 97 6 12148 2524 EMERALD DRIVE DEAN SULANDER REMODEL 5,000 OCT 97 7 12149 4948 BRIGHTON BLVD MARK RISLUND NORSE EXTERIORS RESIDE 4,200 OCT 97 i0 12151 2173 CENTERVIEW LANE TERRI BOBBITT LINDSTROMS REMODEL 26, 000 / .... '3C? 97 ? 12152 4363 WILSHIRE BLVD A312 JAMES ROBINETTE DORGLASS INC GLASS DOORS i, 947 ~ 1997 BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY MONTH YEAR DAY PERMIT ADDRESS OWNER CONTRACTOR TYPE OF CONST VALUTION SAC UNIT OCT 97 8 12153 2620 COMMERCE BLVD RICHARD MEYER FENCE '' ~ OCT 97 8 12154 2191 CARDINAL LANE DONALD DEKARSKI REROOF 1,000 OCT 97 10 12155 4916 EDGEWATER DR MONIQUE YANNOTTI GIERTSEN CO REROOF, REPAIRS 5,000 OCT 97 9 12156 5008 WREN ROAD CARL GLISTER OCT 97 9 12157 5880 IDLEWOOD GLEN BARFKNECHT TWIN CITY TREE TRUST LANDINGS DEMO GARAGE OCT 97 9 12158 5061 BARTLETT BLVD GARY DAVIS SHEETROCK, REMODEL OCT 97 10 12159 4879 EDGEWATER DRIVE BURT LINQUIST WF SMITH REROOF 1,500 OCT 97 10 12160 3041 DUNDEE LANE VICTOR DEPAULIS FENCE ~,~,,~,,, OCT 97 10 12161 1631 GULL LANE DON HEFFNER PANELCRAFT RESIDE 8,122 OCT 97 10 12162 3077-3081 DUNDEE LANE CHRIS PERRINE PANELCRAFT RESIDE 10,500/ OCT 97 13 12163 2612 WILSHIRE BLVD LARRY MELNESS REROOF 3,000/ OCT 97 14 12164 2657 WESTEDGE BLVD GARY PAULSON HUEPENBECKER REROOF 2,900/ OCT 97 14 12165 6140 HAWTHORNE ROAD BUZZ KRAFT D MARTIN CONST REROOF 2,000 OCT 97 14 12166 2560 WEXFORD LANE DANIEL SWANSON OCT 97 14 12167 4912 LESLIE ROAD DOUGLAS ANDERSON REROOF 1,300 I ER OR REMOD 2,000 OCT 97 15 12168 2618 GROVE LANE KELVIN RETTERATR BASEMENT REMOD 1,200 OCT 97 16 12169 2646 WESTEDGE BLVD CRAIG LUDFORD RETAINING WALL 650 , 1997 BUILDING PER]~IT ACTIVITY MONTH YEAR DAY PERMIT ADDRESS owhrgR CONTRACTOR TYPE OF CONST VALUTION SAC_UNIT OCT 97 17 12170 2211 BELMONT L~ RIE BEINERT STERLING FENCE FENCE OCT 97 17 12171 2067 COMMERCE BLVD RAY /kNDERSEN KROOS PICTURE WIhrDOW 1,200 OCT 97 30 12172 5409 CHURCH ROAD FREDERICK GOUGHNOUR DECK 4,400 ~L'~ OCT 97 20 12173 2173 CENTERVIEW LANE TERRI BOBBITT LINDSTROMS GAP. AGE 10,000 t{' ~.~? 97 17 12174 4517 TUXEDO BL'~D JOR/q MI/NDT REROOF 2,000 ~/ OCT 97 20 12175 2929 WESTEDGE BLVD CURTIS BERG STORAGE SHED 2,880 OCT 97 24 12176 2933 DICKENS L~E REGGIE CI-IAMBERS RAINBOW RESTORATION DECK 2,500 OCT 97 21 12177 6090 BARTLETT BLIrD RICHARD JOLICOEUR LEGACY CONSTRUCTION DECK 2,100 OCT 97 21 12179 2137 NOBLE LANE FRITZ COOPER STATEWIDE GAS GAS FIREPLACE 2,000 OCT 97 21 12180 5983 RIDGEWOOD ROAD TBOMAS WILLIAMS WILLIAMS BROTHERS DECK 4 , 500 ~ OCT 97 21 12181 5943 HILLCREST ROAD RUSSELL BOTHERN OCT 97 2! 12182 2316 COMMERCE BLVD LARSON PRINTING MICHAEL DVORACEK OCT 97 22 12183 2906 RAZELWOOD LANE BETSY BERKEY HUBER CONST 97 23 12184 4926 DRU~OATD ROAD GARY FORSMAN OCT 97 23 12185 5680 BARTLETT BLVD RICH3%RD MEYER LINDSTROMS GARAGE WALL SIGN REROOF REROOF FIRE DAMAGE REPAIR 4,290 2 , 130 20, 000~ OCT 97 27 12186 4967 WILSHIRE BLVD ERNIE ROSENBERG SUSSELL CORP GARAGE 10,650 / OCT 97 27 12187 5949 HAWTHORNE ROAD MIKE FOLEY RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN WINDOWS 7, 091 /~'] 1997 BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY MONTH YEAR DAY PEPd~IT ADDRESS OWNER CONTRACTOR TYPE OF CONST VALUTION SAC_UNIT OCT 97 24 12188 2316 COMMERCE BLVD LARSON PRINTING REMODEL 500 112 OCT 97 24 12189 4586 DENBIGH ROAD SCOTT NAGEL MN EXTERIORS RESIDE 6,780 ~ OCT 97 27 12190 1623 GULL LANE DAVE FENNER A LINE CONSTR OCT 97 27 12191 3113 TUXEDO BLVD ROBERT WAGSTROM OCT 97 30 12192 2321 COMMERCE BLVD PXC PROPERTIES SICRON OCT 97 28 12193 2147 GRA/gDVIEW BLVD DAVID HEINSCH OCT 97 29 12194 2373 CHATEAU LANE KEN & KRIS LINQUIST OCT 97 30 12199 4570 DORCHESTER KIP LARSON KDK BUILDERS REROOF 1,900 REROOF 3,000 INTERIOR REMODEL 3,000 REROOF 2,000 REMODEL 600 REROOF 2,400~ GENERAl, PERMITS REC~ !MONTH IYEAR IDAY IPEPAMIT_# 1ADDRESS ICOhFfRACTOR PERMIT_TYPE 1 [OCT 2 3 iOCT 4 !0CT 5 !OCT 6 i0CT 7 iOCT 8 OCT 9 OCT 10 OCT i! OCT 1~ 13 IOCT 14 OCT 15 OCT 16 OCT 17 :OCT 18 OCT 19 ,OCT 2,1 OCT 21 OCT 22 OCT 22 OCT 24 25 OCT 26 OCT 27 ,OCT 197 i97 i97 !97 197 197 !97 97 97 97 i97 !97 97 97 97 i97 i97 197 i97 197 197 97 97 97 97 197 13 14829 ISLAND VIEW DR ID & M MECHANICAL [6 14400 WILSHIRE BLVD IRESIDENTIAL HEATING 16 I2236 COMMERCE BLVD IA AARONS PLUMBING 13782 13784 13785 13786 16 13787 16 3788 17 3789 17 1379o 19 13791 19 13792 19 3793 9 3794 13 3795 13 13796 114 13797 114 3798 [14 3799 115 380O !16 i3802 116 3803 21 3804 21 13805 17 13806 117 3808 117 3809 i5560 THREE POINTS BLVDIA AARON PLUMBING I MAPLE MANORS COURT 12524 EMERALD DRIVE 5120 EDGEWATER DRIVE 5100 DRUMMOND ROAD 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE 12210 SOUTHVIEW LANE IPRACTICAL SYSTEMS 15061 BARTLETT BLVD IGARY DAVIS 5308 THREE POINTS BLVDIAFFORDABLE PLBG 5060 WINDSOR ROAD VOID 11942 SHOREWOOD LANE 11730 SHOREWOOD LANE 11760 COMMERCE BLVD 12618 GROVE LANE 15444 SPRUCE ROAD 16136 EVERGREEN ROAD IVOID 13025 BRIGHTON BLVD tMINNEGASCO IDEAN SULANDER tDAVEY JONES PLUMB {PLUMB MANIA PLBG lB & D PLUMBING IVOID IDINIUS PLUMING IALLIED FIRESIDE IALLIED FIRESIDE 1KELVIN RETTERATH IHELLAND HEATING STATEWIDE GAS IVOID INSP I5330 THREE POINTS BLVDIRONS MECH 15100 DRUMMMOND ROAD IWESTONKA S&W 11611 MAPLE MANOR COURTIWESTONKA S&W 11609 MAPLE MANOR COURTIWESTONKA S&W 11603 MAPLE MANOR COURTIWESTONKA S&W PLUMB v/ MECH ~ I PLUMB ~/ I PLUMB t/ STREET EXCV --"-- PLU~ t/ PLUMB ] PLUMB ~/ IA/C & HTG BY GEORGE IMECH ~ I PLUMB - IVOID I PLUMB I MECH I MECH MECH I MECH I MECH I VOID I STREET EXC W&S CONNECT I W&S CONNECT I W&S CONNECT I W&S CONNECT REC~ IMONTH IYEAR IDAY tPERMIT_# IADDRESS tCONTRACTOR 1PERMIT_TYPE ..... + ......+ .....+ ....+ ......... + ...................... + .................... + .................... 28 29 OCT 30 OCT 31 32 !OCT 33 iOCT 34 iOCT 35 37 38 !OCT 39 !OCT 40 iOCT 41 IOCT 42 IOCT 43 OCT 44 OCT 45 OCT 46 IOCT 47 48 IOCT 97 97 97 197 i97 97 97 97 97 197 197 97 i97 197 197 !97 197 197 197 97 117 13810 122 13811 121 3813 121 3814 121 3816 121 13817 1382o 124 3822 124 13823 28 [3826 28 13827 3o 13829 3o 13830 30 13831 11601 MAPLE MANOR COURT[WESTONKA S&W 12530 RUBY LANE [COUNTRYSIDE HTG 11942 SHOREWOOD LANE I KALMES MECH 12085 IRONq,;OOD LANE I MN WATER TREATMENT 16391 OTTER ROAD I MN WATER TREATMENT [1667 AVOCET LANE NSF 12137 NOBLE LANE 15060 WINDSOR ROAD 3355 WARNER LANE 1609 MAPLE MA/gORS CT 1611 MAPLE MANORS CT 12959 HAZELWOOD LANE 16547 BARTLETT BLVD 13061 DUNDEE LANE MINNEGASCO 12609 GROVE LANE IMERIT HVAC 12612 WILSHIRE BLXrD STATEWIDE GAS 15012 TUXEDO BLVD WESTONKA MECH 12459 LOST LAKE RD I CULLIGA/g WATER 11700 FINCH LANE [CULLIGAN WATER 14608 KILDARE ROAD IALLIED FIRESIDE 12173 CENTERVIEW LANE IVOGT HEATING t W&S CONNECT IMECH k tMECH k [ PLUMB IPLUMB %' ISTREET EXC STATEWIDE GAS IMECH k FLARE HEATING IMEcH ~x I MARK BERG IPLUMB ~ GENERAL P&H tPLUMB ,/ GENERAL P&H IPLUMB .,/ PRACTICAL SYSTEMS IMECH~ COUNTRYSIDE HEATING tMECH ~ MECH ~ [~ECH X IMECH X tFLUMB'& MECHk IPLUMB~ PLUMB v' IMECH X :City of Mound Monthly Report !Utilities Month of: October 1997 Residential Commercial Utility-971 Total No. of Customers: Water Sewer Water Used: (in 1,000 gallons) Billing: Water Sewer Recycle Total 1,119 1,120 19,564 $31,874 $8O, 134 $5,135 $117,143 123 123 3,213 $6,309 $16,802 $106 $23,217 1,242 1,243 22,777 $38,183 $96,936 $5,241 $140,360 Payments: Water Sewer Recycle Total $36,667 $66,866 $5,s52 $109,085 $5,229 $14,450 $83 $19,762 $41,896 $81,316 $5,635 $128,847 Minutes - Planning Commission November 10, 1997 MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 10, 1997 Those present: Vice Chair Michael Mueller, Orv Burma, Frank Weiland, Gerald Reifschneider, Becky Glister, Council liaison Mark Hanus. Absent and excused: Chair Geoff Michael, Orv Burma, Jerry Clapsaddle. Staff Present: Assistant Planner Loren Gordon, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and Planning Secretary Kris Linquist. Public Present: Tom Alexander, Bob Steele MINUTES - APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 27, 1997 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Mueller stated that were comments read "truth and zoning" should state, "truth-in- housing." Corrections have been noted and corrected. MOTION by Weiland, seconded by Mueller to approve the Minutes of the October 27, 1997 Planning Commission Meeting. Motion carried . BOARD OF APPEALS: CASE # 97-39: Variance to construct a non-conforming dwelling, Robert Steele, 23XX Driftwood Lane, Lots 10, Skarp's East Lawn, PID 13-117-24 44 0059 Applicant requested to table this case at this time, he would like some more time to gather information regarding this case before it is heard by the Commission. Mueller stated that there are 3 members not here this evening and that maybe this should be delayed until all members can be present to hear the case in its entirety. Minutes - Planning Commission November 10. 1997 A vote was taken and it was 3-3, it was decided to hear the case tonight, with the understanding that it will be tabled in the end. Building Official Jon Sutherland reviewed the case. The applicant, Robert Steele, is seeking variances on lot area, impervious surface, and lot width in order to allow construction of a new Single Family Dwelling. The proposed dwelling is conforming to the required setbacks for this parcel which is a lot of record. The existing dilapidated old cottage would be removed as part of the proposal. In the event the variance is approved, the floodplain modifications will require other agency approvals and this is addressed in the City Engineers report. This property is located in the R-1 zoning district which requires a minimum street frontage/lot width of 60 feet, a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet, and building setbacks of 30 feet for the front, 6 and 10 foot to the side for lots of record, and a 50 foot setback to the lake. Included in the staff report are the comments of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) who has recommended denial. Attached as staff's exhibit//1, (3 pages) is the Realtors advertisement just prior to the applicants purchasing of the property, this information identified the subject property (tax parcel /159) as being under one ownership with the adjacent parcel to the south (//60). The owner is in the process of filing to change the title over to a family member as noted in the submittle documents, the city currently has no control or regulation over this process. Nonconforming issues and comments: 1) Lot Area: The area of the lot is the area above the flood elevation of 931 as defined in the zoning code (section 350:310, Subd. 78.). This area is noted by the surveyor as 3,200 square feet, 10,000 is required in the R-1 zone resulting in a variance request of 6,800 square feet. Comments: The nonconformity of lot area is substantial and both the adjacent parcels are also substandard to lot area. The adjacent lot//9 to the north received a variance via resolution //96-50 and the background of this case is included in your packet. In comparison the current and the previous case the lot areas are similar however the use of the property and the conditions of each case are quite different. When the current applicant purchased this property the applicant had control over both parcel #59 and #60, both parcels on their own are substantially nonconforming to lot area and occupied by a large amount of floodplain. One option available would be to combine the nonconforming parcels, demolish the old cottage, and develop a proposal for one dwelling that is more consistent with the lot area provisions. 2) Lot Width: The existing lot width is 49 feet, 60 feet is required resulting in a variance request of 11 feet. Minutes - Planning Commission November 10, 1997 Comments: Combination of the parcels and elimination of the old cottage would result in a minor improvement to the lot width. The County Plat Map needs to be revised to reflect the apparent vacation of a portion of Driftwood Lane. 3) Floodplain: A substantial portion of this and adjacent property is in the floodplain. The applicant is proposing to fill and compensate on site, the City Engineer has addressed this issue in his report. Comments: According to the ordinance floodplain area cannot be used to calculate lot area. GENERAL COMMENTS: The criteria for granting variances requires that in order to grant a variance a finding of hardship or practical difficulty must be made and also that specific circumstances exist as outlined in Section 350:530. In this case staff cannot support a finding of hardship or practical difficulty as there are other options available to the applicant such as combining this property with the parcel #60 to the south that is also nonconforming to the floodplain and lot area. A combination of the parcels would be more consistent with the City Zoning Code, and also with the Comprehensive Plan statements related to the removal of nonconforming situations when possible regardless of whether they result from lot size, structural type or setbacks. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend denial of this case based on the conditions as stated above. If the Commission concurs with this recommendation a list of findings should be made that are consistent with this recommendation. DISCUSSION: Voss questioned what the differences between lots 9 and 10. Sutherland stated that Wigners house (Lot 9) was occupied and repairs could have been made instead of building a new one. They also had a nonconforming garage. It was the use of the property that sets the properties apart. Hanus questioned why that particular section was zoned R1 and not R1A. It was decided that it was probably due to the way the rest of the area is zoned. Weiland questioned why was lot 10 separated without having the required 10,000 square feet. Sutherland stated that on the original plat, lot 10 had its own PID number and lots 11-12-13 had one PID number and had the same ownership. Mueller stated that it is all under one legal description and doesn't understand how lot 10 can be divided off from the rest of the parcel without applying for a subdivision. Applicant, Bob Steele, 8515 Wood Lane, Germantown TN, purchased the property for himself and his daughter, his daughter lives in the house on lot 11. On page 8, #2 regarding Lot Width show on survey on page 22, the survey states that the Minutes - Planning Commission November 10, 1997 frontage is 55 feet. He stated that he will probably have another survey showing the street vacation. Made comments regarding the usage of the adjacent property. The difference between lot 9 and 10, lot 9 already had a foundation where the cottage on lot 10 does not. Sutherland stated that he needs to make a correction on page 8, #2 regarding lot width that it is 55' instead of 49' but needs to be verified by an updated survey. Mueller questioned the vacation of the road. Steele stated that the original plat at Hennepin county shows that it was platted for his property. Steele stated that he didn't feel that the use of the property was disclosed to him by the realtor. He stated that most of the homes on Driftwood are non conforming. Stated he filed for title on lot 10 two months ago. He currently has the titles. Lot 10 was owned by separate owner previously. He stated that the DNR stated that they may not have the jurisdiction to give a recommendation. His response to the Planning Commission is he would like to table the case until he can get some more information together for the Planning Commission. He feels that since the variance was given to lot 9 that the Commission should do the same for his case. Some of the ground has been eroded away over time. Hanus questioned why the property was not subdivided to make lot 10, 10,000 square feet. Steele stated that it would lose its lot of record status. Mueller stated the comprehensive plan to Mr. Steele. MOTION to table Voss, seconded by Weiland to table this case as per the request of the applicant. Motion carried 6-0. CASE # 97-54: Variance, lot size, yard and hardcover to build a second story addition, Thomas Alexander, 4994 Manchester Road, Lot 12, Block 33, Wychwood, PID 24-117-24 42 0005 Assistant Planner Loren Gordon reviewed this case. The applicant, Thomas Alexander, is seeking a variance to recognize the lot size, yard and hardcover variances to build a second story addition. The setback variance are listed below. Existing/Proposed Required Variance Lot Area 4,700 sf 6,000 sf 1,300 sf Hardcover 3,389 sf 1,880 sf 1,509 sf Front Yard 10.6' 20' 9.4' Rear Yard 6.2' 15' 8.8' This proposal is the second attempt to build a two story home on this property. you recall, this case is very similar to the Dow case held before the Planning Commission in October of 1996. In that case, the owner had also proposed a second story addition but never completed the project. As X0?0 Minutes - Planning Commission November 10, 1997 The current proposal is to push out the front wall of the house to match the garage and open foundation bricks. A second story addition would be built over the home leaving the garage in a one story design. The proposed addition would have a single hip roof to match the design of the garage. Cedar siding is proposed for the exterior for all of the house. The concrete patio on the lakeside would stay and a new deck is proposed on the south side of the patio which would stay behind the edge of the patio keeping it out of the Brighton Commons land. The proposed improvements will substantially improve the condition and livability of the property. A two story design fits well with the new home construction just south of Manchester Road. The hardcover issues remains unchanged from the previous request. Although the Brighton Commons area cannot be considered in the hardcover calculations, it will provide some relief for filtration. The commons area adjacent to the lot is approximately 2500 sf for that area between the north and south lot lines. If included in the property, hardcover would be under the required minimum. One issue not discussed in the previous case was that the house is built with a crawl space that is below the flood elevation. The Building Official has reviewed this issue and has determined a further review will need to be made. If the crawl space is determined to be a basement as per building code, the owner would need to fill it to a point above 933 feet. Based on the previous case history the recommendation from Staff was for approval of the improvements. The issues of this case are practically identical. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the variance as requested with the following condition: 1. A determination of the crawl space be made by the Building Official. DISCUSSION: Weiland would like see alot of the concrete removed. Gordon stated that he discussed that with the applicant and the applicant agreed. Gordon suggested that the proposed deck be cut back to 10 feet and the concrete underneath be removed. The proposed deck will be 10 x 30 and will be conforming to the setbacks. MOTION by Weiland to motioned to approve staff recommendation with the condition of removing any concrete to the west of the home, with a reduction of the deck of 10 feet in width, Voss seconded. Motion carried 6-0. This case will go to City Council on November 18,1997 Minutes - Planning Commission November 10, 1997 Information: City Council Minutes - October 28, 1997 Discussion was made regarding the truth-in-housing issue. Talked about making up a zoning sheet that could be distributed to realtors. Voss discussed the issue of the CDBG funds. He feels that it should be looked into again. This was discussed at length. Mueller made comments that he'd like to add regarding the Steele case, he doesn't feel that the two parcels are separate but are one and it should be a subdivision not a simple change of name even though they have separate PID numbers. Hanus stated that he would like to have the city attorney view this case before this case comes back to the planning commission. It was discussed and was determined to cancel the November 24th Planning Commission meeting. MOTION by Weiland, seconded by Reifschneider to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 p.m. The motion carried 6 - 0. CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax e-mail: at~s@kennedy-graven.com JAMES M. STROMMEN Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9233 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: SRA City Man~,Administrators/Director/Altemate Jim Stromme~4"~ October 30, 1997 PUC 612 Area Code Decision As you have heard on the news, on October 28, 1997, the PUC adopted an area code split that incorporated the SRA recommended approach of keeping municipalities intact. The surprise aspect of the PUC decision was the adoption of a north/south (primarily along Minneapolis/St. Paul lines) split using municipal boundary lines. This is a significant victory for cities because only the SRA originally advanced the position of re-drawing proposed area code boundaries along municipal boundaries, and to my knowledge, it has not been done yet anywhere in the country. The PUC decision was so unanticipated that an actual map of its intended split has yet to be prepared. The closest existing map is the Three-Way Split proposal along wire center boundaries. The Commissioners, however, definitively ordered the boundaries to follow municipalities, "where possible". The decision was clearly made following arguments by US West that it would be too expensive to partition wire centers to accomodate municipal lines. Therefore, it does not appear likely that the Commission will readily allow deviation from city boundaries. The decision in favor of the geographic split was four to one, with Commissioner Don Storm favoring the overlay method. Commissioner Gregory Scott was the first of the Commissioners JMS132806 SU160-31 to mention the need to keep municipalities intact when the boundaries were drawn. The PUC did not adopt the Department of Public Service inner-outer circle approach, probably because the Commissioners wanted to avoid splitting communities of interest normally attached to the Minneapolis or St. Paul area. The most notable exception to this approach is the inclusion of Burnsville in the new area code, aligned with St. Paul and suburbs. I am informed that Burnsville was included in the eastern area to maintain the Dakota County area and to keep the area codes in the local service territory of Frontier from having two different area codes. The Commissioners rejected US West's claims that partitioning wire centers along municipal boundaries would be too expensive. There is a likelihood, however, that US West will seek reconsideration of this decision or argue that certain wire centers cannot be partitioned when the boundaries are re-drawn. FUTURE ACTION The new area code will be assigned to the eastern Metro area some time in early 1998. The mandatory switch will begin January 1, 1999. Seven-digit dialing will be retained within each area code. Ten-digit dialing will be required between area codes, without paying an additional toll charge not otherwise charged for calls outside the Metro area. Because the Commissioners adopted a geographic split plan that had not been previously drawn along municipal boundaries, there are more unknowns associated with the feasibility and costs of such divisions. The SRA should monitor the next few months of this process closely to ensure that US West does not defeat the intended municipal boundary area code divisions by claiming it is not "possible". I would like to thank the cities that provided resolutions and articulated issues that could arise were a city split by area code. Karen Cole of our office, who appeared before the PUC, was able to use an example provided by the City of Edina of potential problems with municipal services were an area code split made within the city. The City of Columbia Heights also provided a detailed resolution pointing out the drawbacks to splitting the city. Please contact me at 3'37-9233 or Karen Cole at 337-9212 if you have any questions. JMS:sms JMS!22~06 SU160-31 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYINOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 MEMORANDUM November 13, 1997 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO 1998 BUDGET PER YOUR REQUEST OF 10/20/97 COW Pursuant to your request at the October 20, 1997 Committee of the Whole Meeting, Gino and I have prepared the revisions to the 1998 Budget that reflect your discussion. We have reduced the fund balance to approximately 37% of the total expenditures and consequently, the tax levy has been reduced to a 1.91% increase. As I stated at the COW meeting, you should really think hard about taking this type of action. Please remember that you did not increase the tax levy for 1997; you kept it at the 1996 level. You took this action without any levy limits in place. Now that levy limits are in place for 1998 and 1999, we are falling further behind by not increasing the levy by 5.50% which is about 6% less than what the levy limit is. Reducing the fund balance, on a consistent basis, is not a prudent thing to do. Over a short period of time we will not have adequate reserves to cover increasing expenses and cash flow needed to operate. Fund #30 (Capital Improvement Fund) will not be around forever and the Liquor Store profits are not guaranteed. To further complicate the tax levy, the proposed operating expenses of a renovated Westonka Community Center will have to be considered. If the referendum passes and the City of Mound and the Westonka School District are successful in negotiating a joint powers agreement, estimated operating expenses of nearly $400,000 annually must be covered by both parties. In an earlier memorandum to you, we listed a number of financial resources for consideration. Of those listed, the property tax levy seemed to be the only consistent resource to tap for such expenditures. Although we did not propose a major increase in the property tax levy for these expenses, an increase would be necessary to supplement the Capital Improvement Fund and Liquor Fund. We indicated o95 printed on recycled paper Memorandum to the Mayor and City Council November 13, 1997 Page 2 to you that neither the Capital Improvement Fund or the Liquor Fund could be counted on into the distant future and that the property tax is the only major resource that we have to utilize for the renovation project. In order to finance the operating expenses, the city may have to look at reductions in other operations of the city to avoid major property tax increases. In summary, we have to analyze our responsibilities and obligations in providing municipal services to our residents. We cannot rely upon reserves to carry operations of the city into the future. Some property tax increases are necessary and residents must realize this if they are going to demand certain services. It is important to keep taxes to a minimum but if services are to be continued at present levels and additional services are going to be requested or demanded, be prepared to address them through the property tax; there is no other consistent revenue at our disposal. Gino and I along with the Department Heads look forward to the December 11, 1997 Truth in Taxation hearing to discuss these issues further. If you have any questions prior to that time, please contact me. CITY OF MOUND TAX LEVY RECAP TAX LEVIES * REVENUE FIRE RELIEF ASSESSMENT - CITY LAND PUBLIC WORKS LEVY TOTAL LEVY 1995 1996 1659200 1713545 33350 33350 30000 20000 85580 83400 1808130 1850295 PROPOSED 1997 1998 1745900 1762380 33350 33350 3650 0 81040 83660 1863940 1879390 SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT) 24000 24000 24000 24000 *THE 1991 LEGISLATURE CAPPED THE LEVY AMOUNT FOR FIRE PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS AT THE 1991 LEVY AMOUNT. THE 1998 FIRE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF MOUND CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIRE RELIEF PENSION IS $46,830. THE $13,480 INCREASE FROM 1991 CONTRIBUTION WILL BE FUNDED BY THE GENERAL TAX LEVY. NOTE: THE TRUTH IN TAXATION LEVY NOTICE WILL COMPARE THE 1997 AND 1998 LEVY AMOUNTS AFTER STATE PAID CREDITS. TOTAL LEVY HACA AID CERTIFIED LEVY FISCAL DISPARITY NET LEVY 1996 1997 1998 1850295 1863940 1879390 -485095 -490980 -492040 1365200 1372960 1387350 -191851 -199610 -191550 1173349 1173350 1195800 1.91% INCREASE GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 1995 1996 1997 1997 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED PROJECTED 1998 PROPOSED REVENUE GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE LICENSES NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS GENERAL GOVT. CHARGES OTHER REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL EXPENDITURES CiTY COUNCIL PROMOTIONS CABLE T.V. CITY MANAGER/CLERK ELECTIONS & REGISTRATION ASSESSING FINANCE COMPUTER LEGAL POLICE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLANNING & INSPECTION STREET CITY PROPERTY & BLDGS. PARKS RECREATION CONTINGENCIES TRANSFERS 1218251 1298717 1266460 1265000 1271500 903001 948728 968210 982930 950850 3618 3660 6250 4900 4780 103171 128893 121800 109100 105300 46941 51874 49350 49740 48950 146870 186862 110050 162500 157700 54102 56294 53500 55500 55500 2475954 2675028 2575620 2629670 2594580 68673 67942 69370 69370 71610 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 948 745 800 800 3000 157742 153828 193470 193470 210970 2009 11927 2100 2100 13200 52667 57210 59480 59480 62450 152806 164972 168960 168960 172710 16843 14484 23550 20000 18550 94709 82917 114460 90000 86460 817883 830829 924350 924350 990170 3356 3749 4100 4100 4250 163883 170238 172870 172870 173280 423094 444035 405270 430000 420820 102412 94014 82840 82840 103380 131030 135269 148550 148550 192380 28969 30082 36200 36200 37290 23061 14295 20000 25000 45000 140960 155310 161390 161390 167430 FUND FUND TOTAL INCREASE BALANCE, BALANCE, EXPENDITURES (DECREASE) JANUARY 1 DECEMBER 31 2385045 2435846 2591760 2593480 2776950 90909 239182 -16140 36190 -182370 843560 934469 953389 1173650 1209840 934469 1173651 937249 1209840 1027470 GENERAL FUND REVENUE GENEraL PROPERTY TAXES CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES DELiNQ. AD VALOREM TAXES PENALTIES & INTEREST FORFEIT TAX SALE APPORT. TAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID HACA AID LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID STATE AID FOR STREETS POLICE PENSION AID GR-A-~TS FROM OTHER GOVT. UNIT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE LICENSES LIQUOR LICENSES BEER LICENSES GARBAGE LICENSES ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES MISC. BUSINESS LICENSES MISC. BUSINESS PERMITS CIGARETTE LICENSES LICENSES NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS DOG LICENSES BUILDING PERMITS PLUMBING PERMITS EXCAVATION PERMITS HEATING PERMITS MISC. NON-BUS. LICENSES FIRE PERMITS NON-BUS. LIC. & PERMITS 1995 1996 1997 1998 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED PROPOSED 1192129 1259594 1225460 1235500 15087 17918 22000 22000 8313 15490 7000 8000 2722 5715 12000 6000 1218251 1298717 1266460 1271500 13274 48634 46000 20000 4287 4500 5000 5000 300595 309740 327300 328150 466799 454675 456610 461850 0 0 10800 12850 52343 56538 55000 56000 57098 66436 60000 65000 8605 8205 7500 2000 903001 948728 968210 950850 1000 1225 3000 1950 725 720 i000 700 500 500 500 500 360 335 600 350 224 210 250 400 670 555 700 600 139 115 200 280 3618 3660 6250 4780 1109 4799 1500 5000 91386 109565 !10000 90000 966 4466 1300 1300 3556 3598 3000 3500 3458 3800 3500 3500 1740 1972 2000 1500 956 693 500 500 103171 128893 121800 105300 GENERAL GOVT. CN_ARGES FRANCHISE FEE - CABLE T.V. PLANNING COMM. APPL. ZONING CHARGES SALES OF MAPS, ETC. ASSESSMENT SEARCHES MISC. SERVICE CHARGES DOG PICK-UP CHARGES GENERAL GOVT. CHARGES OTHER REVENUE ACCIDENT REPORTS SURCHARGES COURT FINES INTEREST RENT (DEPOT) NEW ASSESSMENTS SALE OF PROP. & EQUIPMENT MISCELLANEOUS OTHER REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS TRANS. FROM OTHER FUNDS TOTAL TRANSFERS TOTAL REVENUE GENERAL FUND REVENUE 1995 1996 ACTUAL ACTUAL 1997 1998 APPROVED PROPOSED 41206 43959 41000 42000 3669 5194 5000 5000 142 94 200 t00 283 1140 300 500 192 140 300 300 49 33 50 50 1400 1314 2500 I000 46941 51874 49350 48950 1448 1534 212 260 71090 95854 26802 36703 2450 1825 931 1025 7344 8087 36593 41574 146870 186862 10602 12794 43500 43500 54102 56294 2475954 2675028 1500 1500 250 200 65000 85000 20000 35000 2300 2500 i000 500 10000 8000 10000 25000 110050 157700 10000 12000 43500 43500 53500 55500 2575620 2594580 BREAKDOWN BY PERCENTAGE GENEP~AL PROPERTY TAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE LICENSES NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS GENERAL GOVERNMENT CHARGES OTHER REVENUE TRANSFERS TOTAL 49 20% 36 47% 0 15% 4 17% ! 9O% 5 93% 2 19% 100.00% 48.55% 35.47% 0.14% 4.82% 1.94% 6.99% 2.10% 100.00% 49 17% 37 59% 0 24% 4 73% 1 92% 4 27% 2 08% 100.00% 49 01% 36 65% 0 18% 4 06% I 89% 6 08% 2 14% 100.00% CITY OF MOUND GENERAL FUNDREVENUES Property Tax (49.0%) Intergovernmental Revenue (36.6%) I Interfund Transfers (2.1%) Other (6.1%) Charges for Services (1.9%) Licenses (4.2%) Note: 1998 PROPOSED CODE 3370 3740 3895 1300 2100 2120 2140 2200 3100 3210 4110 4120 4200 4210 4255 RECYCLING REVENUE HENNEPIN COUNTY REIMBURSEMENT ($.80 PER HOUSEHOLD FOR 1998) HOUSEHOLD CHARGE ($1.75/MO./HOUSEHOLD) SALE OF RECYCLABLES TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES SALARIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PRINTED FORMS COPY MACHINE & FEES OPERATING SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POSTAGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MEETING EXPENSE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SER. SPRING/FALL - RECYCLING DAY RECYC-LOTTO TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUE OVER(UNDER) EXPENDITURES FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1 FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31 1995 1996 1997 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED 4270 1998 PROPOSED 30522 30949 30720 30720 60107 62941 57600 67200 26420 15651 117049 109541 20000 21000 108320 118920 15129 12809 15000 17000 0 0 50 50 0 0 50 0 138 101 250 250 36 3511 4000 4000 7 7 50 50 17 11 30 30 250 270 300 350 27 43 100 i00 71528 71528 71520 80000 23153 28483 25000 25000 2600 2600 2600 0 112885 119363 118950 126830 4164 -9822 -10630 -7910 56500 60664 46564 40210 60664 50842 35934 32300 THE CITY OF MOUND INVITES YOU and YOUR SPOUSE or S.O. to its ANNUAL CHRISTMAS PAR~ SUNDAY, DECEMBER 14th at THE MOUND AMERICAN LEGION Social Hour: Dinner: Program: 5:30pm (Cash 6:30 pm 7:30 pm Your R. S. V.P. is Very Important and Dinner Reservations are a MUST! Please do so by Tuesday, Dec. 9th to Jodi at 472-0600 or, you are welcome to arrive after dinner. Notice of Proposed Total Budget and Property Taxes The Mound city council will hold a public hearing on its budget and on the amount of property taxes it is proposing to collect to pay for the costs of services the city will provide in 1998. SPENDING: The total budget amounts below compare the city's 1997 total actual budget with the amount the city proposes to spend in 1998. 1997 Total $2,707,870 Proposed 1998 Budget $2,893,960 Change From 1997 - 1998 6.9% TAXES: The property tax amounts below compare that portion of the current budget levied in property taxes in the city of Mound for 1997 with the property taxes the city proposes to collect in 1998. 1997 Property T~xes $1,372,960 Proposed 1998 PrQ_oertv Taxes S1,429,440 Change from 1997 - 1998 4.1% Attend the Public Hearing All Mound city residents are invited to attend the public hearing of the city council to express their opinions on the budget and on the proposed amount of 1998 property taxes. The hearing will be held on: Thursday, December 11, at 7:30 p.m. Mound City Itall 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN. You are also invited to send your written comments to: City of Mound, City Manager's Office, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN. 55364 Gray Freshwater Center Hwys. 15 & 19, Navarre Mail: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331-9578 Phone: (612) 471-0590 Fax: (612) 471-0682 Emaih admin@minnehahacreek.org Web Site: www.minnehahacreek.org Board of Managers: John E. Thomas President C. Woodrow Love Vice President Pamela G. Blixt Treasurer Monica Gross Secretary Thomas W. LaBount7 Thomas Maple, Jr. Malcolm Reid District Office: Diane P. Lynch District Administrator Printed on recycled Daper corffapn[n§ al ~east 30% Dost consumer waste To: From: Re: Date: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life RECEIVED Interested Parties 6 1997' Memo Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Minor Amendment to the MCWD's Water Resources Management Plan - Langdon Lake Restoration Project Wenck File #0185-04-246 November 5, 1997 Enclosed please find a proposed minor amendment to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's (MCWD) Water Resources Management Plan (January 1997) for the Langdon Lake Restoration Project. The MCWD Board of Managers will be holding a public informational meeting and a public hearing concerning this project at Mound City Hall. We will notify you of this hearing in the near future. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact District Administrator Diane Lynch. N \0185\04-246\MIP 11057 AES:irw DRAFT MINOR PLAN AMENDMENT Langdon Lake Restoration Project Description of the Project an0 Nee0: The overall purpose of the Project is to improve the water quality of Langdon Lake bv reducing internal phosphorus loads from the existing lake sediments. The PrQect involves application of liquid alum to the lake surface in areas deeper than five feet. The alum will produce a fl0c which ~ertles to the bottom effectively blanketing the sediments to inhibit the release of phosphoru~ to the lake water. The application is done bv boat equipped w/th alum tanks and diffuser pipes. Alum treatment is a proven and accepted meaa.~5._for reduction of internal phosphorus loads in lakes. Implementation of the project is expected to be completed within a time frame ofthree weeks. Need for the Project Langdon Lake c, nce received the effluent from the City of Mound wastewater treatment facility from 1963 to 1974. The City. of Mound wastewater treatment pond was not designed to remove phosphorus: the estimated phosphorus load to Langdon Lake durin~ 1969 tO 1970 was 17.880 pounds per year (Table I][-20). The pond is located near the western end of Langdon Lake. A large percentage of the influent phosphorus load would have ~ertled in the Langdon Lake sediments providing a source for present internal loads. Historical water sampling data characterizes Langdon Lake as hypereutrophic and having extremely poor water quality when compared to other lakes in the upper watershed. The average summer 8-umm~ epilimnetic phosphorus concentration of 898 gg/L reported__ia Table II-60 of this plan is are approximately 18 times higher than the 50 p,g/L goal set by this plan (Table L-I). Since wastewater discharges to the lake ceased in 1974, the lake has experienced gradual improvement, but in recent years the improvement has ~lowed. The average summer surface phosphorus concentration during 1993 through 1996 ~vas still 250 .ug/L. Water clarity is 10w with Secchi depths varying between 0.10 and 0.4 meters w'ifl~ no noticeable improvement trend over the past twenty years. In fact. as phosphorus concentrations have decreased. Chlorophyll-a, a measure of algal population. has generally increased with an average of 210 [tg/L over 1992 to 1996. Low Secchi depths and high Chlorophvll-a characterize the intense algal blooms experienced in Langdon Lake also t-t frequently experiences severe dissolved oxygen depletion during the winter and summer months ~'~ ~"~';~';*~ ~';'~ ...... +~+: .... c ,,h^~, ...... ,4 0~,~ .... ~-,.~ ~ (~ .... ~ Oxygen depletion is caused bv decay 0falgae and can lead to fish kills. T x,0185\04\ 104\FILI-20005 DOC-JRT (Draft- Octoher 1997) 164 It is likely that a majority of the phosphorus and associated water quality problems are is due to internal loading of phosphorus from the lake sediments attributable to past wastewater discharges. Phosphorus profiles taken during the summer of 1997 indicate the strong upward gradient of soluble reactive phosphorus which iS indicative of internal phosphorus loading. Sediment samples also taken during 1997 indicate high levels Of` phosphorus in the lake bottom, Langdon Lake is intermittently a tributaw to Lake Minnetonka via a culvert under CSAH 15 so that the high concentrations in Langdon Lake cause phosphorus loadings to Lake Minnetonka. Therefore besides revitalizing Langdon Lake. the Project would have. a smaller secondar.v effect of reducing phosphorus loadings to Lake Minnetonka. The r""*~'*;~' ..... ....... ~'~" gccd ';.'atcr qua!i~' ;~ ..... ~ ~;~ Lanxdcn Lalc~ ears ts Evaluation of Alternatives Recent water quali _ty model calculations indicate that the total annual phosphorus load would have to be at least 3.200 pounds to cause summer epilimnetic concentrations of 250 .ug/L in Langdon Lake. With the external load estimated at about 460 pounds, about 85 percent of the total load must be internal. With this result, measures to reduce th~: external load would not be economically justified and the focus of the improvement project must be reduction of the internal load. With a drainage area tO lake area ratio of' just 6.4:1. the potential for improved water quali .fy with lowered internal loads is good. Alum treatment is the most effective, reliable and cost-effective means currently availabh, for controlling internal phosphorus loads from lake sediments. This was shou~n recently in the District's Jennings Bay Feasibility Study and Langdon Lake is not different in thi~,; regard. Monitoring necessary to verify_ the alum dose was carried out in 1997. t:\O ~$\04'I97~FILI;O00¢ DOC (Draft- October 1997) 164a $ I OO,O00 1998 Alum Treatment Administration Costs (30%. include~ engineering. permit acquisition, construction administration, and legal) TOTAL: $120,000 $ 30,000 $150,000 Method of Financin~ Implementation of the Project will be financed through an ad valorem levy. pursuant to Minnesota Statute~ § 103B.251. 1:501 g 5',0-1\ I :)TM:I L EOOI)5 DOC (Drqt?- Ocmhc'r / 99 ~') 164b