The URL can be used to link to this page

2004-04-27 , -, ~t J,, t I! t,]ll PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELl, PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ........................................... : .................... :.?::.::¥+': ................ : ............ ::::.': ...................................................... : ........... · .................. :.......~: .~:::.~..~.~ ~x~,::Rz~.~ ~,~t~tm/.~tl~:~t~;ff:j~O~]~ MOUND CITY COUNC~ TUESDAY, AP~L 27, 2004; 7:30 PM ~GULAR MEET~G MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS · ConsentAgenda: Items listed under t~e Consent~genda are considered routine in nature and ~ill be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no sefarate discussion of t~ese items uMess a Council Member or Otizen so requests. 1~ t~at e~ent t~e item ~ill be removed from t~e Consent ~genda and consi&red in normal sequence. Open meeting - Pledge of Allegiance Page 2. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent___~A enda *A. Approve minutes: April 13, 2004 regular meeting *B. Approve payment of claims *C. Approve one-year extension of contract with Waldron & Associates to provide back-up building inspection services Approve resolution approving conditional use permit and variance for Xcel Energy electrical substation expansion at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard, and clarifying the finding of fact regarding fence height *E. Approve resolution authorizing submittal of Environmental Resources Fund (ERF) grant application to Hennepin County for preparation of Phase II Report and Response Action Plan (RAP) for Auditor's Road District for MHRD project 1108-1113 1114-1139 1140-1148 1149-1153 *F. Approve resolution authorizing submittal of grant application to Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) for environmental testing in True Value District, for proposed parking deck in downtown 1154-1158 *G. Approve restaurant licenses & *H. Approve amusement devices licenses *I. Approve summer hours for City Hall and Public Safety Administration Offices, May 17-Sept 3, 2004. 1159 1159 C~ *L. Approve resolution authorizing the conveyance of certain exclusive permanent driveway easement: Reed and Pond 1160-1161 ,~ -, , a~ il, ~,, PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. *J. Proclaim 35th Annual Municipal Clerks Week: May 2-May 8, 2004 1162 *K Approve Planning Commission Recommendations 1. Case #04-03: Tim Olson & Lisa Wallace 4520 Denbigh Road Variance: garage addition & remodel t163-1166 2. Case//04-06: Scot and Jacqueline.Kirk 2163 Fairview Lane Variance: new house construction PC recommendation: approval with conditions 1167-1193 *M. Approve resolution designating polling places in accordance with Minnesota State Statute 204B. 16 1194 Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) Public Hearings Proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance - Temporary Membrane Structures (continuation of public hearing on 4/13). PC rec' d: approval 1195-1213 Action authorizing the approval of an agreement with HKGi for preparation of AUAR for MHRD downtown project 1214-1232 Action on resolution authorizing pre-sale of 2004 bonds for 2004 projects, with bond award set for May 25, 2004, as presented by Jim Prosser of Ehlers and Associates 1233-1240 8. CSAH 15 Assessments Action on resolution ordering preparation of report for construction and realignment of CSAH 15 Action on resolution calling hearing on construction and realignment of CSAH 15 1241-1242 1243-1244 Action on extension of building permit until August 31, 2004, for property located at 2647 Westedge Boulevard 1245-1246 10. Information/Miscellaneous A. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Communit~ Collaborative. 1247-1250 B. Minutes: DCAC 1251-1252 C. LMC Friday Fax 1253-1254 D. FYI: PD letter to Spring Park 1255-1256 E. Letter: Scholarship to Officer Burke from Chamber of Cormnerce 1257 F. Calendar: LMCC 1258-1259 G. Report: Building Activity - March 2004 1260 H. Minutes: Planning Commission - Mar 15 through Apr 19, 2004 1261-1274 I. Update: Planning and Building Inspections Department 1275-1288 11. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citvo£mound, com. COUNCIL BRIEFING April 27, 2004 Uocomin~ Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Apr 26 - 7:00 - PC/CC workshop Apr 27 - 7:15 - HRA regular meeting Apr 27 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Apr 29 - 6:30 - Disaster training (meal served starting at 6:15 p.m.) May 10 - 6:30 - Parks facility tour and Public Works needs assessment workshop May 11 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting May 11 - 7:30 - CC regular m6eting May 15 - 8:00-3:00 - Recycling Day - Minnetrista Public Works May 22 - 10:00-2:00 - City Silent Auction of Surplus Goods - City Hall & PS Facility June 5 - 3:00-12:00 - Mound Fire Department Fish Fry June 6 - DARE Open June 18 - 8:00 a.m. - City Golf Outing Aug 21-22 - Mound Art in the Park Uocomin~ Absences Apr 19-25 May 12-14 Pat Meisel Kandis Hanson Conference Summer Hours c,Again this year, I am recommending that Mound City Hall will be open extended hours Monday through Fhursday during the summer to make it easier for residents, business owners and contractors to do business with the City. The summer hours, which would be effective Monday, May 17 through Friday, Sept 3, would be as follows: Monday-Thursday 7:30 - 5:00 Friday 7:30 - 11:30 Each year I assess summer hours based on that year's experience. Staffhas been informed that certain expectations must be met, and that there could be no abuses by frequently taking Fridays off. In past years we staff'did their best to get written comments, but unfortunately, customers were reluctant to take the time to fill them out. The comments received were: Great benefit to the city and to the employees. Very good idea. I would not have got my water turned on if you were no open till 5:00 p.m. This helps us working folk out a lot. Thank you. About time! It is my thought that had our customers been unhappy with the hours, we would have gotten lots of written comments. As is typical, when they are okay or happy with a service we don't generally receive comments or praise. It is my recommendation that we repeat the hours again this year. c, Note: Summer hours at Harbor Wine & Spirits are 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m, Memorial Day through Labor Day. Labor Ne~,otiations Labor negotiations continue with the three, bargaining units. No agreements have been reached. PC/CC Meeting - This Monday!!! Please bring the March 29t~ agenda packets from the cancelled meeting, with you, so to avoid printing costs. Tidbits ~im and Elaina Kurtz have purchased a townhome in Minnetrista--just before you turn left on to Sunnyfield Road John Colotti's wife, Roberta, has been hired as City Clerk for the City of Champlain...where Kurtz worked formerly. I'm getting married .... not really .... just checking to see if you read all this stuffi !! /,.... MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 13, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, April 13, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Planner Loren Gordon, City Engineer John Cameron, Harvey Sussman, David Sussman, David Olson, Debbie Bee, Scott Johnson, Duane Norberg, Brenda Berent, M. Chatterton, Chuck Champion, Klm Truax, Beth Johnson, Mark lee, Tim OIson, Lisa Wallace, Neil Sprague, Police Chief Jim Kurtz. Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll carl vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meetin.q and Pled.qe of Alle,qianco Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Approve A.qend~ MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3..Consent Agenda Meisel requested the removal of Item 3C(2) for discussion, and the removal of Items 3J and 3L, as requested by City Staff. Meyer requested the removal of Item 3K for discussion. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meher to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of March 23, 2004 regular meeting and March 30, 2004 special meeting. B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $991,866.73. C. (1) Set special joint meeting of the Planning Commission and the City Council for April 26, 2004, from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. (2) removed for discussion D. Approve Payment Request No. 4 from Environmental Associates for $73,615.75 for Lost Lake Greenway Project E. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Minnetonka Classic Bass tournament weigh-in at Mound Bay Park on June 5, 2004. 1 -1108- Council Minutes- April 13, 2004 F. Approve Public Gathering Permit and Transient Merchant License as requested by Mark Lee for Art-in-the-Park (Mound Bay Park, for August 21 and 22, 2004. G. Approve Transient Merchant License: Northwest Tonka Lions for food vending at Mound Bay Park on certain dates as requested. H. Approve agreement between City of Mound and Orvin Burma, Clifford Schmidt, Jr., Michael Castiglione, Paul Glynn, James Ostman and Pat Buffington, related to Avalon Park. I. RESOLUTION NO. 04-40: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT TO HAVE CITY ACT AS LEGAL SPONSOR FOR THE PROJECT CONTAINED IN THE OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES J. (removed) K. (removed for discussion) L. (removed) 3C. (2) MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to set the special meeting for a tour of the Parks facility and presentation related to the Public Works Facility for May 10, 2004, at 6:30 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3K. Approval of Resolution Vacatinq a Portion of Kells Lane to Include Le.qal Meyer asked that this item be pulled from the consent agenda because he is opposed to the resolution. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-41: RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING RESOLUTION NO. 02-37 REGARDING VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE KELLS LANE STREET RIGHT- OF-WAY ADJACENT TO LOTS 24, 25, AND 26, BLOCK 24, SETON ADDITION TO INCLUDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVOLVED PORTIONS AND REFLECTING SATISFACTIONN OF THE CONDITIONS. P&Z CASE #01-46. 4. Comments and su.q_clestions from citizens present on any item not on the a~enda..- None were offered. 5. AcknOwled..qment of Police Oh'icers~ Fire Fi.qhters and Paramedics for Saving the Life of Nell Phillip Spra_clue Police Chief Jim Kurtz presented Plaques to Paramedics Sarah Tesch and Molly Donovan, and Firefighters Brian Berent, Kevin Flaig, John Larson, Jim Casey, and Jason Maas. He then presented the Mound Police Department Life Saving Medals to Officer Nick Schwalbe, Officer Mike Sussman, and Sergeant Todd Truax for responding to a medical call where a man was found unconscious, not breathing and with no pulse. 2 -1109- C Council Minutes- April 13, 2004 CPR was administered for over ten minutes, Mr. Sprague began breathing on his own and has made a full recovery. G. Public Hearings A. Retaininq Wall Improvement Project 2004 1. Receiving Report for Retaining Wall Proiect John Cameron reviewed the feasibility report, stating that the retaining wall project will be combined with the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. MOTION by Brown seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-42: RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT FOR RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2004 2. Improvement Hearinq for 2004 Retaininq Wall Proiect Mayor Meisel called the hearing to order at 7:50 p.m. She asked for public comment and upon receiving none, closed the hearing at 7:51 p.m. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-43: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2004. B. Case #04-01 and 04-02: Xcel Energy Substation Expansion' 5471 Lynwood Blvd, Conditional use Permit and Variances Sarah Smith presented an overview of the proposed project to upgrade the existing substation. Issues include height regulation of building and electrical equipment. Xcel proposes a 46 foot height for the building and an 18 foot variance for electrical equipment. The fence height is proposed at 8 feet per the National Electric Code, requiring a 2 feet height variance. The Planning Commission has reviewed the project and expressed concerns revolving around the lack of site landscaping, the appearance from Shoreline Blvd, and the proposed building location. They recommend approval of the request, as does City Staff with conditions. Smith stated that additional permits will be needed for grading and wetland issues and will be addressed at a later date. Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. 3 -1110- Council Minutes - April 13, 2004 Beth Johnson, 5409 Church Road, wanted to understand the aesthetic issues and the project schedule, asking when the landscaping would be initiated. Dave Olson of Xcel Energy answered that the grading would commence this year with landscaping to start this Fall or next Spring. Johnson asked about the buzz sound of the existing facility and Olson stated that the station would comply with State laws for noise and be quieter than the existing facility. Meisel closed the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04.44: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER DIBIAI XCEL ENERGY TO ALLOW EXPANSION AND UPGRADE OF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD. P&Z CASE #04-01 AND 04-02, PID #13-117-24-33-0037 AND 13-117-24-33-0097. C. Proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance - Temporary Membrane Structures Mayor Meisel stated that staff recommends tabling this item until April 27. Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. and no public comment was heard. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to continue the public hearing until April 27, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7. Planning Commission Recommendation A. Case #04-03 - Tom Olson and Lisa Wallace, 4520 Denbi.qh Road Loren Gordon reviewed the request to rebuild an existing house that would result in three variances, lakeside and front yard, plus hard surface coverage variance. Planning Commission reviewed and voted to deny. Staff recommends approval of the lakeside and front yard variances, and denial of the hardcover variance. Staff is asking for direction regarding this case. Discussion took place regarding feasibility of a 2-car garage vs. a 3-car and where the hardship falls, and the concern about overbuilding in the area. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to have staff prepare a resolution that will be on the consent agenda of April 27th, for approval as discussed and modified. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4 -1111- Council Minutes- April 13, 2004 8. Action on Resolution Accepting Bid or 2004 Street Reconstruction Project John Cameron reviewed the bids received for the subject project. MOTION by Brown seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-45: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 9. Action Revokinq MSA Desiqnation for Part of Lynwood and Belmont Avenues and Designation of Manchester Road as MSA Route John Cameron explained that with Hennepin County's right-of-way agreement, they are giving the City back the portion of County Road 15 that will be of no further use to them, in exchange for the City giving them the necessary right-of-way on Lynwood and Belmont. Lynwood and Belmont are on our Municipal State Aid system, so thus the City needs to adopt a resolution revoking them from the state aid system. The designated mileage for state aid streets is presently about .27 over, and with revoking these two streets it bring it up to almost ¼ a mile, thus the recommendation that Manchester Lane be added from Devon east to Tuxedo Blvd., putting us over by. 15. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-46: RESOLUTION REVOKING MUNICIPAL STREET AID STREETS AND ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET 10. Lake Minnetonka Druq Task Force Police Chief Jim Kurtz presented a proposal to the Council, requesting approval to join the Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force. Joining this task force would increase the budget by $19,800. The Police Departments of Medina, West Hennepin Public Safety, and Orono have offered to grant the City of Mound $5,000 to start operations in July of 2004. The money would be used to off-set the above mentioned budget. Kurtz suggests budgeting overtime hours in the future years to cover this expenditure. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve that the Mound Police Department join the Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 11. Discussion and Review of Subdivision Regulations/Lake Access Issue~ Smith addressed the Council regarding recent inquiries of properties regarding "dock lots". These properties are combined for tax purposes and typically are not buildable. The Council raised questions regarding what types of regulatory approaches might be utilized to address this issue. Ideas about lot combination with adjacent lots or lots in the same proximity were discussed. The Council identified that separate lots for dock purposes are not desirable. Council suggested that the Planning Commission review 5 -1112- Council Minutes- April 13, 2004 this item to identify issues that may need to be addressed, bt was noted that the LMCD will be included in future discussions. 12. Information/Miscellaneous A. Correspondence: LMCD B. LMC Friday Fax C. Newsletter: Gillespie Center D. Calendar: LMCC E. Acknowlegment for Use of Gambling Funds from Mohawk Jaycees F. Notice of employee resignations: Public Work Worker Al Kestner, and Building Official Matt Simoneau 13. Adjourn MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 9:33 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City CLerk Mayor Pat Meisel 6 -1113- APRIL 27, 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 041404SUE $10,910.41 APR 041902SUE $2,481.01 APR 042104SUE $31,540.90 APR 042204CARD $8,847.95 APR 042204SUE $450.00 APR 042704SUE $277,307.30APR TOTAL $331,537.57 C -1114- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 041404SUE Payments Refer 41404 FACKLER, JAMES Cash Payment Invoice 041404 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 04/15/04 11:23 AM Page 1 Current Period: April 2004 User Dollar Amt $10,910.41 Computer Dollar Amt $10,910.41 $0.00 In Balance G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 4/14/2004 4/8/2004 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $50.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 41404 FLAIG, KEVIN M. Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-16-04 ARSON AWARENESS $200.00 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 41404 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-16-04 ARSON AWARENESS $200.00 invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 41404 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER( Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs BAYRIDGE RD AT CTY RD 44 $200.00 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 1404 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER( Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs LANGDON LANE AT CT RD 15 $50.00 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 41404 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs HALSTEAD LANE AT 110 $200.00 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 41404 HENTGES, MATTHEW Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-16-04 ARSON AWARENESS $200.00 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 71404 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins RUPTURED WATERMAIN $1,000.00 Invoice 11047265 4/17/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00 Refer 41404 ROBERTS, COLLETTE Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $1,870.02 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents 2004 REIMBURSEMENT $1,300.00 invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $54.87 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 REIMBURSEMENT $398.00 Invoice 041404 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,622.89 -1115- City of Mound 04/45/0411:23 AM Page 2 Payments CiTY OF MOUND Refer 41404 SBC MINNCOMM PAGING Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 04-04 PAGERS $119.76 Invoice 20233304045 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $119.76 Refer 41404 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 03-31 STREET LIGHTING $5,067.76 Invoice 0542-505-000-B Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,067.76 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $8,740.65 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $719.76 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $450.00 601 WATER FUND $1,000.00 $10,910.41 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $10,910.41 Total $10,910.41 -1116- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 041904SUE Payments City of Mound 04/19/04 2:51 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: April 2004 User Dollar Amt $2,481.01 Computer Dollar Amt $2,481.01 $0.00 In Balance Refer 41904 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs 4/19/2004 4/19/2004 Cash Payment Invoice 2003-80 Transaction Date COMP PLAN AMENDMENTS $86.25 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.25 Refer 42104 MOUND POST OFFICE Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $120.42 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $120,41 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.83 Refer 42104 VERIZON WIRELESS (PA/V) Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 03-17-04 CELL PHONES $59.20 Invoice 3530492866 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 03-17-04 CELL PHONES $23.65 Invoice 3530492866 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 03-17-04 CELL PHONES $59.20 Invoice 3530492866 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.05 Refer 42104 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities 03-04~2170-989-449-089 $1,207.13 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-381 Electric Utilities 03-04 #2170-989-449-089 $804.75 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,011.88 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $950.20 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1,207.13 601 WATER FUND $144.07 602 SEWER FUND $179.61 $2,481.01 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $2,481.01 Total $2,481.01 -1117- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 042104SUE Payments City of Mound 04 2 04 9:21 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: April 2004 User Dollar Amt $31,540.90 Computer Dollar Amt $31,540.90 $0.00 In Balance Refer 42104 BECK, KENNETH Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $45.00 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.00 Refer 42104 DEPARTMENT NATURAL RESOUR Cash Payment E 601-49400-455 Permits 2003 DNR FEE $1,838.50 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 PO 18299 Transaction Date 4/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,838.50 Refer 42104 FIRE RESCUE SCHOOL, STATE M Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ON SCENE RESCUE/WATER RESCUE $500.00 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.00 Refer 42104 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $2,036.19 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 (,.'_.Transaction Date4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 I' Total $2,036.19 Refer 42104 HENNEPIN COUNTY DISTRICT CO Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 5424 SHORELINE DRIVE/BALBOA PROPERTY $1,800.00 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,800.00 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLINISH PETTY CASH $213.77 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 PO 18351 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $213.77 Refer 42104 RECYCLING MANAGERS, ASSOCI Cash Payment E 670-49500-208 Instructional Supplies 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $20.00 Invoice 17506 4/21/2004 PO 17506 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00 Cash Payment Invoice 042104 Transaction Date E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA MOWER 4/21/2004 PO 18191 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo $24,944.37 10100 Total $24,944.37 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies GILLESPIE PLAQUE $103.89 Invoice 042104 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $103.89 Refer 42104 VERIZON WIRELESS (FIRE~FIN) Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 612-269-9058 $2.31 Invoice 042104 4/3/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 612-875-4502 $2.31 Invoice 042104 4/3/2004 -1118- City of Mound 04/21/04 9:21 AM -~. Page 2 //'~ ~[ ~.. Payments CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 042104 Transaction Date E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 612-240-5244 $34.56 4/3/2004 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $39.18 Fund' Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $27,276.20 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $606.20 455 TIF 1-2 $1,800.00 601 WATER FUND $1,838.50 670 RECYCLING FUND $20.00 $31,540.90 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $31,540.90 $31,540.90 -1119- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/21/04 1:37 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Batch Name 042204CRCARD Payments Rear 11 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 CICash Payment Jlnvoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Cash Payment l'nvoice 042204 Transaction Date User Dollar Amt $8,847.95 Computer Dollar Amt $8,847.95 MTI DIST (2) SEMINAR SLUMBERLAND, TABLES MICROFISHE TRAINING, RITTER,RAHN BEO PUBLICATION STARTUM ONE FITNESS, EQUIPMENT STARTUM ONE FITNESS, EQUIPMENT MEMPHIS,TN CONFERENCE MICHAELS, WOOD KINKO'S, 2003 REVIEWS $0.00 In Balance ELAN CREDIT CARD Ck# 095083 4/22/2004 E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous GALLERY,NAVARRE,FRAMING 3/22/2004 E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training CRAGUNS LODGE, CONFERENCE 4/1/2004 E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training ATSSA CONFERENCE,GEISE,HETIZ 3/26/2004 E 101-41920-210 Operating Supplies PCRUSH,PRINTER 3/22/2004 E 101-42400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA OFFICE MAX,PRINTER CALBE 3/24/2004 E 101-41500-212 Motor Fuels BEACHS, GASOLINE 3/30/2004 E 101-41920-205 Computer Software OFFICE MAX,SOFTVVARE 4/7/2004 E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery FLEETFARM,HOSE REEL 3/16/2004 E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training 3/17/2004 E 101-41910-430 Miscellaneous 3/19/2004 E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 3/25/2004 E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies 3/9/2004 E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies 3/15/2004 E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies 3/15/2004 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 3/18/2004 E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 4/1/2004 E 101-42110-203 Printed Forms 3/9/2004 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MERMAID CAR WASH, SQUAD #845 3/1512004 E 101~42110-219 Safety supplies ST.BONI MOTORSPQRTS, SUMMER HELMETS 4/5/2004 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training DOMINOS PIZZA, TRAINING 4/5/2004 E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous JOANNS FABRICS, PRINT 4/6/2004 4/21/2004 10100 $196.49 $125.00 $606.94 $946.35 $29.81 $16.42 $74.50 $74.50 $200.00 $159.74 $1,431.78 $41.50 $846.68 $745.50 $2,492.80 $5.31 $253.10 $191.59 $229.87 $58.64 $121.43 Wells Fargo Total $8,847.95 -1120- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND City of Mound 04/21/04 1:37 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: April 2004 10100 Wells Fargo $5,461.66 $3,380.98 $5.31 $8,847.95 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $8,847.95 $o.oo $8,847.95 -1121- CiTY OF MOUND Batch Name 042204SUE Payments City of Mound Payments 04/22/04 10:45 AM Page 1 Current Period: April 2004 User Dollar Amt $450.00 Computer Dollar Amt $450.00 Refer 42204 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 4/22/2004 4/21/2004 Cash Payment Invoice 042204 Transaction Date $0.00 In Balance COUNTY ROAD 110 $50.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 42205 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs APP GEN STORM/WATER PERMIT $400,00 Invoice 042204 4/22/2004 Transaction Date 4/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $400.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $450.00 $450.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 $45O.O0 Total $450.00 -1122- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 042704SUE Payments City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: April 2004 User Dollar Amt $277,307.30 Computer Dollar Amt $277,307.30 $0.00 In Balance Refer 42704 AMCON Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CLEANING SERVICES Invoice 041904-1 4/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 $9,621.60 Total $9,621.60 Refer 42704 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise Fo~ R ICE $60.72 Invoice 463410411 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $96.28 Invoice 46341204 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $157.00 Refer 42704 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,344.75 invoice 29197200 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $216.00 Invoice 29195000 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,180.15 Invoice 29256800 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $240.00 Invoice 29219200 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $149.92 Invoice 38293600 4/16/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $119.34 Invoice 29222700 4/16/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$32.00 Invoice 29244000 4/15/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $93.18 Invoice 29184000 4/9~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $481.50 Invoice 29154900 4/9/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $111.94 Invoice 38270300 4/9/2004 Transaction Date 4/13/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,904.78 Refer 42704 BRAND NETWORKING Cash Payment E 101-42110-440 Other Contractual Servic COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEERING $1,500.00 invoice 15792 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEERING $500.00 Invoice 15792 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEERING $1,000.00 Invoice 15792 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-220 Repair/Maint Supply COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEERING $1,000.00 Invoice 15792 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies COMPUTER NETWORK ENGINEERING $2,644.72 Invoice 15792 3/26/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,644.72 -1123- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Refer 42704 BRENSHELL/FINE LINE DESIGNS Cash Payment G 101-22972 1989 Lakeside Lane Window REFUND ESCROW ACCOUNT $1,000.00 Invoice 022407 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00 Refer 42704 BRW ENTERPRISES Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $120.00 Invoice 10185 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.00 Refer 42704 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SWITCH $53.49 Invoice N288829 3/23/2003 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $53.49 Refer 42704 CA T AND FIDDLE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $694.00 Invoice 38743 4/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $694.00 Refer 42704 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities $264.39 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 C Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities $575.41 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities $395.45 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities $881.51 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities $490.41 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities $267.49 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities $356.66 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,231.32 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery STEPSHEILD $63.88 Invoice D5859 4/16/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISC TUBE $19.15 Invoice D250929 4~6~2004 Cash payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL, AIR FILTER $239.00 Invoice D251479 4/9/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $322.03 Ref;r ~704 bZiN:N~TS3~Ti~;S ~ Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical Services 04-06-04 DRUG SCREENING $18.00 Invoice 811538 4/9/2004 c~Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services 04-06-04 DRUG SCREENING $18.00 ,nvoice 811538 4/9/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Fargo 10100 Total .~Ro0Wells Refer 42704 COCA COLA B°TTLING-MIDWEST 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 #543-000-053-000 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 #543-001-095-800 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 #543-001-833-500 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 #543-001-853-000 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 #543-001-972-603 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 #543-001-972-603 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 #543-001-972-603 -1124- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment Invoice 81354191 4/15/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Refer 42704 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 22503-B 4/27/2004 E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $291.80 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $291.80 TRIMMER, ETC $9.75 METERS $192.66 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.66 BEER $1,221.35 BEER $1,040.25 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9.75 Refer 42704 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-04 COPY MAINTENANCE $346.80 Invoice 46388 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $346.80 Refer 42704 CRYSTEEL DISTRIBUTING, INC. Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA VEE PLOW $4,936.28 Invoice F18291 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,936.28 Refer 42704 DAWES WATER EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 3217706 3/30/2004 PO 182888 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Refer 42704 DA Y DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 260254 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 261192 4/20/2004 Transaction Date 4/13/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,261,60 Refer 42704 DEL PLACEMENTAGENCY, INCOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 03-26-04 WINE POURING $100.00 Invoice 4002 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/13/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 42704 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 6803080628 4/6/2004 PO 18286 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Refer 42704 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 222341 4/19/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 222436 4/19/2004 Transaction Date WHITE TRAFFICE PAINT $340.81 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $340.81 4/13/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 42704 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 03-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE Invoice 22108 4/10/2004 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Invoice 22107 4/10/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,756.50 $2,486.15 $6,242.65 $2,400.00 $1,237.50 $3,637.50 -1125- City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM -"~"'-- ......~'~"--~ Page 4 _//"'"~ .~ Payments CiTY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2004 Refer 42704 ESS BROTHERS AND SONS,/NCO Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply MANHOLE COVERS $575.10 Invoice GGl148 3/31/2004 PO 18289 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $575.10 Refer 42704 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $128.00 Invoice 194108 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $128.00 Refer 42704 FIRE RESCUE SCHOOL, STATE M Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-23-04 GUSTAFSON FIRE SCHOOL $80.00 Invoice 0020000SFS-65 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-23-04 HENTGES FIRE SCHOOL $80.00 Invoice 0020000SFS-65 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-23-04 ROGERS FIRE SCHOOL $80.00 Invoice 0020000SFS-65 4/5/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 42704 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 04-04 DEPOT $19.58 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 C'~ra~saction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19,58 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies HELMETS AND FRONTS $538.25 Invoice 9026 4/14/2004 PO 18072 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $538.25 Refer 42704 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-12-04 UNIFORMS $30.23 Invoice 6891428 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-12-04 UNIFORMS $30.23 Invoice 6891428 4~27/2004 Cash Payment E 602.49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-12-04 UNIFORMS $30.23 Invoice 6891428 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 04-12-04 MATS $28.34 Invoice 6891428 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400~230 Shop Materials 04-12-04 MATS $28,34 Invoice 6891428 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 04-12-04 MATS $28.34 Invoice 6891428 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101.45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 04-12-04 MATS $114.01 Invoice 6891429 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101.41910.460 Janitorial Services 04-13-04 MATS $75,03 Invoice 6891430 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 04-13-04 MATS $55.98 Invoice 6891427 4/27/2004 /,,,.~Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 03-16-04 MATS $52.49 (nvoice 6865047 4/27/2004 ~,--- Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 04-13-04 MATS $141.47 Invoice 6891418 4/27/2004 -1126- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 6891419 Cash Payment Invoice 6884851 Cash Payment Invoice 6884851 Cash Payment Invoice 6884851 Cash Payment Invoice 6884851 Cash Payment Invoice 6884851 Cash Payment Invoice 6864851 City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 6825356-B 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 6825356-B 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 6825356-B 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 6825356-B 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials invoice 6825356-B 4/27~2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 6825356-B 4/27/2004 E 101-42110-460' Janitorial Services 4~27~2004 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 4/27/2004 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 4/27/2004 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 4/27/2004 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 4/27/2004 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 4/27/2004 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 4/27/2004 02-10-04 CREDIT -$32.97 02-10-04 CREDIT -$32,97 02-10-04 CREDIT -$32.97 02-14-04 CREDIT -$32.97 02-14-04 CREDIT -$32~97 02-14-04 CREDIT -$32.96 04-13-04 MATS $38.55 04-06-04 UNIFORMS $26.92 04-06-04 UNIFORMS $26,92 04-06-04 UNIFORMS $26.91 04-06-04 MATS $46.30 04-06-04 MATS $46.30 04-06-04 MATS $46.30 Transaction Date 4/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $675.08 Refer 42704 GLASS PLUS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies GLASS FOR TABLE $214.07 Invoice 9508 4/12/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $214.07 Refer 42704 GRAND PERE WINES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $294.00 Invoice 13569 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $294.00 Refer 42704 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $587.00 Invoice 63143 4/7/2003 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $587.00 Refer 42704 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,920.72 Invoice 874926 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $568.50 Invoice 874789 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $148.95 Invoice 871672 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $614.08 Invoice 872082 4/4/2004 -1127- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,458.58 Invoice 872083 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$6.01 Invoice 637754 4/19/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$20.49 Invoice 637750 4/19/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.00 Invoice 637347 4/15/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,684.33 Refer 42704 GROTTA, DAVE CUSTOM WOOD D Cash Payment E 609-49750-401 Repairs/Maint BuiJdings WINE RACKTOPS $3,594.38 Invoice 130 4/18/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,594.38 Refer 42704 GUST, RONALD R. JR Cash Payment E 609-49750-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE MILEAGE $10.50 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.50 Refer 42704 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 101-41410-202 Duplicating and copying VERIFICATION CARDS $84.15 C I nvoice 042704 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84 15 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training MANAGING PERSONNEL CLASS $606.93 Invoice 00078311 4/6/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $606 93 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $26.00 invoice 329155 4/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26.00 Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $7,254.83 Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE $4,454.54 Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22988 Heritage Point Trailer Court 03-04 HERITAGE POINT TRAILERS $255.00 Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $738.38 Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22957 2420 Westedge #03-37 Horn 03-04 2420 WESTEDGE BLVD $85.00 Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22977 NSP Excel #04-01/#04-02 Va 03-04 XCEL ENERGY CUP $85.00 Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22978 4520 Denbigh #04-03 Olson, 03-04 4520 DENBIGH ROAD VARIANCE $212.50 /~"~ Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 L Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 MOUND VISIONS $5,570.63 Invoice 0402704 4/8/2004 -1128- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 0402704 Transaction Date City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 7 Payments Current Period: April 2004 ;~,: E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 TIF RELATED WORK $2,909.50 4/8/2004 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $21,565.38 Refer 42704 HOME DEPOT/GECF Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies WET/DRY VAC, ETC $142.13 Invoice 18202 4/7/2004 PO 18202 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply MAILBOX $13.81 Invoice 014108/7047290 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $155.94 Refer 42704 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,017.58 Invoice 1708708 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $296.20 Invoice 1708709 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $682.20 Invoice 1708710 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $973.62 Invoice 1706046 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,369.00 Invoice 1706047 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,338.60 Refer 42704 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 04-19-04 COUNCIL COOKIES $53.07 Invoice 4/19/2004 Transaction Date 4~20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $53.07 Refer 42704 KILEY, JM AND SON'S TRUCKING Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials MARTIN MARIETTA $268.29 Invoice 2216 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $268.29 Refer 42704 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing 04-03-04 SEC 350:310 $111.44 Invoice 981X 4/3~2004 Cash Payment G 101-22977 NSP Excel #04-01/#04-02 Va 04-03-04 XCEL CUP $41.79 Invoice 982 4/312004 Transaction Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.23 Refer 42704 LANDON, DON Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND DOCK FEE $7.50 Invoice 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7.50 Rear 42704 LEAGUE MN C/TIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $1,352.58 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $419.47 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $539.32 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 -1129- City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM ..... ""' Page 8 /~-~ ~,\ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $99.30 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $2,934.58 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42115-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $44.52 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $513.64 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $3,247.90 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $217.44 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $732.79 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $3,929.33 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $4,198.13 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $3,066.42 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $3,066.42 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIA 2ND INSTALLMENT $433.16 Invoice 15687 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24,795.00 Refer 42704 MADDEN, FRANK AND ASSOCIA T Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $2,264.10 Invoice 042704 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,264.10 Refer 42704 MARIETTA, MART/N AGGREGA TE Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials FA-3 MODIFIED $631.70 Invoice 2080643 4/13/2004 PO 18290 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $631.70 Refer 42704 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,752.80 Invoice 655256 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,348.82 Invoice 657823 4/20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $53,30 Invoice 657824 4~20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $39,00 Invoice 657825 4~20~2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,193 92 ~"'"Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 MISC ENGINEERING $51.50 f~,,,,....nvoice 47101 4/1/2004 Project 08900 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 MISC BLDG ENGINEERING $103.00 Invoice 47102 4/1/2004 Project 08901 -1130- CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 47103 Cash Payment Invoice 47104 Cash Payment Invoice 47105-A Cash Payment Invoice 47105-B E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 101.43100-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 601.49400-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 602.49450-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 9 Payments Current Period: April 2004 03-04 MISC P/Z ENGINEERING $154.50 Project 08902 03-04 MISC STREET ENGINEERING $206.00 Project 08903 03-04 MISC WATER ENGINEERING $283.25 Project 08904 03-04 MISC SEWER ENGINEERING $283.25 Project 08904 Cash Payment Invoice 47106 Cash Payment Invoice 47107 Cash Payment invoice 47108 Cash Payment Invoice 47109 Cash Payment Invoice 47110 Cash Payment Invoice 47111 Cash Payment invoice 47112 Cash Payment Invoice 47113 Cash Payment Invoice 47114 Cash Payment Invoice 47115 Cash Payment Invoice 47116 Cash Payment Invoice 47117 Cash Payment Invoice 47118 Cash Payment Invoice 47119 Cash Payment invoice 47120 Cash Payment invoice 47121 Cash Payment Invoice 47122 Cash Payment Invoice 47123 Cash Payment Invoice 47124 Cash Payment Invoice 47125-A Cash Payment Invoice 47125-B E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 455-46383-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 455-46383-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 G 101-22869 Landgon Woods, 00-35 4/1/2004 E 455-43255-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 401.43110-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 281.45210-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 03-04 MISC PARK ENGINEERING Project 08905 03-04 LANGDON DEVELOPMENT Project 10183 03-04 CTY RD 15 RELOCATION Project 12533 03-04 DOWNTOWN TIF DISTRICT Project 12534 03-04 AUDITORS RD DEVELOPMENT Project 12639 03-04 LANGDON WOODS DEVELOPMENT Project 12911 03-04 MCES LIFT STATION Project 13132 03-04 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT Project 13215 03-04 DOCK LOCATION MAP G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 03-04 WELL/PUMPHOUSE 4/1/2004 Project 13223 Project 13313 G 101-22890 2957 Cambridge Retain Wall 03-04 2957 CAMBRIDGE, SKAALERUD 4/1/2004 Project 13501 E 401.46540-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 4/1/2004 Project 13566 G 101-22899 Pastuck Natural Homes #02- 03-04 PASTUCK SUB-DIVISION 4/1/2004 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 4/1/2004 E 401.43105-300 Professional Srvs 411/2004 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 Project 13770 03-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE Project 13832 03-04 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION Project 14121 03-04 NPDES PHASE II MS4 PERMITTING Project 14137 G 101-22957 2420 Westedge #03-37 Hom 03-04 2420 WESTEDGE #03-39 4/1/2004 Project 14550 G 101-22958 2175 Noble Ln #03.40,#03-4 03-04 2175 NOBLE LANE #03-40 4/1/2004 E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 E 602.49450-300 Professional Srvs 4/1/2004 Project 14556 03-04 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION Project 14615 03-04 UTILITY PLANS MYLAR Project 14660 03-04 UTILITY PLANS MYLAR Project 14660 $143.80 $122.50 $7O5.0O $103.00 $87.0O $103.00 $206.00 $103.00 $106.50 $3,801.70 $154.50 $2,903.50 $51.50 $257.50 $2O6.O0 $687.00 $154,50 $51.50 $35,351.10 $204.40 $204.40 -1131- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 10 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 UTILITY PLANS MYLAR $204.40 Invoice 47125-C 4/1/2004 Project 14660 Cash Payment G 101-22974 Bloomquist Hotel Developme 03-04 BLOOMQUIST HOTEL DEVELOPMENT $51.50 Invoice 47126 4/1/2004 Project 14669 Cash Payment G 101-22978 4520 Denbigh #04-03 Olson, 03-04 4520 DENBIGH ROAD #04-03 $103.00 Invoice 47127 4/1/2004 Project 14681 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT $1,364.30 Invoice 47128 4/1/2004 Project 14702 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 2004 RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT $154.50 Invoice 47129 4/1/2004 Project 14707 Cash Payment G 101-22982 5077 Shoreline Drive #04~07 03-04 5077 SHORELINE DRIVE #04-07 $51.50 Invoice 47131 4/1/2004 Project 14731 Cash Payment G 101-22988 Heritage Point Trailer Court 03-04 6639 BARTLETT HERITAGE COURT $206.00 Invoice 47132 4/1/2004 Project 14755 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-04 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $129.50 Invoice 47130-A 4/1/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-04 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $129.50 Invoice 47130-B 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 4/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ........................................... $49,183.10 Refer 42704 MID AMERICA~ i~"]Oash Payment E 222-42260-217 Fire Prevention Supplies LOLLIPOPS SAFETY FIRST $160.15 invoice 589888 4/6/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-217 Fire Prevention Supplies LILLIPOPS STOP/ROLL $187.61 Invoice 590210 4/9/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous TRAVEL MUGS $79.34 Invoice 588524 3/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $447.10 Refer 42704 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment F: 609-49750.401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 03-29-04 WINDOW WASH $37.28 Invoice 411002358 4/4/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.28 Refer 42704 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA Cash Payment E 609-49750-434 Conference & Training Invoice 2004-5 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Refer 42704 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 ALCOHOL TRAINING $150.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 12-31-03 THRU 03-23-04 MAXWELL $1,920.00 PROPERTY Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 920 00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 03-04 DRILLS $640.00 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-185 Fire-Maintenance Pay 03-04 MAINTENANCE $1,183.00 C '?voice 042704 4/27/2004 ,;ash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 03-04 WAGES $4,040.00 Invoice 042704 4~27~2004 -1132- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 4/20/2004 City of Mound Payments 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 11 Current Period: April 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,863.00 Refer 42704 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 05-04 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE $735.25 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $735.25 Refer 42704 MOUND, CITY OF Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities 03-04 WATER/SEWER $25.21 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.21 Refer 42704 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-05 MUSIC SERVICE $92.90 Invoice A438471 4127/2004 Transaction Date 4/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $92.90 Refer 42704 NATIONAL WATERWORKS Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts CLAMPS, WIRE $426.43 Invoice 0094480 1/23/2004 PO 18223 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $426.43 Refer 42704 NEOPOST Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract INK JET CARTRIDGE $171.36 Invoice 10891180 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 . Wells Fargo 10100 Total $171.36 Refer 42704 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $343.00 invoice 25402 4/712004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $343.00 Refer 42704 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials MAGNET $26.36 Invoice TI-0120515 3/2512004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials WORK ORDER PART $71.36 Invoice TI-0120476 3/25/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies DOG SIGNS $124.70 Invoice TI-0121025 4/6/2004 PO 18195 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $222.42 Refer 42704 NORTH MEMORIAL EDUCATION Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 05-04-04 EMS CLASS $10.00 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 PO 18346 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.00 Refer 42704 NRG PROCESSING SOLLUTIONS L Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 03-04 BRUSH SERVICE $12,500.00 Invoice 43878 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,500.00 Refer 42704 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 03-04 LOCATES $54.63 Invoice 4030555 3/31/2004 -1133- E CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 4030555 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 12 Current Period: April 2004 E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 03-04 LOCATES $54.62 3/31/2004 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.25 Refer 42704 PA TCHIN MESSNER AND DODD Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 5377 SHORELINE DRIVE APPRAISAL $3,000.00 Invoice 20413-1 4/14/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance XXXX JUNIPER ROAD $4,500.00 Invoice 20413-7 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,500.00 Refer 42704 PA USTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$19.95 Invoice 13754 2/2/2004 Cash Payment E 609.-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $744.00 invoice 8033064 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $19.95 Invoice 8033065 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,297.00 Invoice 8032921 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,041.00 Refer 42704 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 'C~Pa~/~-ent E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa- MIX $97.20 Invoice 58671650 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $97.20 Refer 42704 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,499.70 Invoice 2060334 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE ~$174.00 Invoice 3296721 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $145.50 Invoice 2058283 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,800.55 Invoice 2058284 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,271.75 Refer 42704 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $556.07 Invoice 38997 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ClGARET'rES $324.14 Invoice 36881 3/28/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $880.21 Refer 42704 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale invoice 392516-00 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CInvoice 392271-00 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 389714-00 4/6/2004 WINE $528.63 LIQUOR $1,046.65 CREDIT-WINE -$4.66 -1134- City of Mound 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 13 /~'~'~'~ ~ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$14.66 Invoice 390469-00 4/8/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$25.99 Invoice 389710-00 4/6/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$25.32 Invoice 390897-00 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $614.50 Invoice 389998-00 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,359.36 Invoice 389960-00 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $686.39 Invoice 390002-00 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $79.20 Invoice 390039-00 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,244.10 Refer 42704 RANDY'S SANITATION Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $114.54 Invoice 1582 4/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $114.54 Refer 42704 RECYCLING ASSOCIATION MINNE Cash Payment E 670-49500-208 Instructional Supplies 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $65.00 Invoice 1290 12/16/2003 PO 18376 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65.00 Refer 42704 RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL, MOUND Cash Payment E 101-45200-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING $26.78 Invoice 042704 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING $27.80 Invoice 042704 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING $27.80 Invoice 042704 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING $27.00 Invoice 042704 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING $27.00 Invoice 042704 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $136.38 Refer 42704 RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL, WACONIA Cash Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical Services VACCINES $666.00 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $666.00 Refer 42704 RITTER, BONNIE Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 04-12-04 REIMBURESEMENTS LASER FICHE $191.04 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $191.04 Refer 42704 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 2132 OVERLAND RD $1,112.93 Invoice 4955 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,112.93 -1135- Ci CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04~22~04 3:30 PM Page 14 Current Period: April 2004 Refer 42704 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 12-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $300.35 Invoice 0112706 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.35 Refer 42704 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment E 222-42260-350 Printing LAMINATION CARD $1.60 Invoice 65303 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $I .60 Refer 42704 STERLING FENCE, INCORPORATE Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts FENCDE REPAIR $1,188.00 Invoice 19778 4/13/2004 PO 18200 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,188.00 Refer 42704 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LIFT STATIONS $1,526.74 Invoice 8222 3/12/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LIFT STATIONS $1,541.76 Invoice 8227 3/19/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LIFT STATIONS $154.00 Invoice 8232 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies STINGER SPIKE SYSTEM $532.45 Invoice 430682.1 4/9/2004 PO 18341 Transaction Date 4/13/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $532.45 Refer 42704 SWEARENGIN, RICHARD Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LIGHT FEE $10.50 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.50 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $271.00 Invoice 31781 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,584.90 Invoice 330905 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $57.25 Invoice 330904 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $242.00 Invoice 31883 4/19/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,009.55 Invoice 331636 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $63.85 Invoice 331635 4/21/1940 Transaction Date 4/13/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,228.55 Refer 42704 TOL'L GA~ ~D' wEL;iN~ S~L~ ";ash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $18,51 Invoice 443597 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18.51 -1136- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 15 Current Period: April 2004 Refer 42704 TRI-STATE PUMP AND CONTOL, I Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts STROBE LIGHT $141.43 Invoice 23201 3/29/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 5HP DUPLEX CONTROL PANEL $17,475.59 Invoice 23191 3/26/2004 PO 16040 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $17,617.02 Refer 42704 TROPHIES BY LINDA Cash Payment E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense PLAQUES $111.91 Invoice 11320 4/9/2004 PO 18347 Transaction Date 4/13/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.91 Refer 42704 TRUXSTOR CUSTOM TRUCK ACC Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TWO WAY REMOTE $79.88 Invoice 24046 2/26/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $79.88 Refer 42704 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies invoice 425567-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425567-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425567-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425567-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425567-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425567-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601.49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425567-0 4/2712004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425567-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 426002-0 4/27/2004 PO 18349 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424087-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424580-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425010-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425184-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS BATTERIES, STAPLER INK JET CARTRIDGE CHAIRMAT WRIST PAD CONFERENCE TABLE MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS $6.38 $6.38 $6.38 $6.38 $6.38 $2.13 $4.26 $4.26 $310.07 $42.15 $59.63 $17~47 $661.37 $49.80 $49.80 $49.80 $49.80 -1137- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 16 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424877-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies invoice 425184-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425184-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425148-0 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 425381-0 4/27/2004 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEIS MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEiS KEYBOARD,RACK,ETC KEYBOARD,RACK,ETC KEYBAORD,RACK,ETC PLASTIC SPOONS $49.80 $18.62 $32.20 $32.2O $43.87 $87.75 $87.75 $19.63 Transaction Date 4/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,704.26 Refer 42704 V & S JEWELERS Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves ENGRAVE PLAQUE $186.38 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 PO 18345 (,,"~ ~Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186.38 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LIGHT FEE $10.50 Invoice 042704 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.50 Refer 42704 WASH DEPOT Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #640 SQUAD WASH $3.73 Invoice 2396 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3.73 Refer 42704 WlDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract GATE VALVES/2 GATE VALVES $1,200.00 Invoice 507 4/16/2004 Transaction Date 4/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,200,00 Refer 42704 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale LIQUOR $605.70 Invoice 25579-00 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $605.70 Refer 42704 WINE DOCTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $486,00 Invoice 2004-147 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $486.00 Refer 42704 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $936.00 Cinvoice 93982 4/7/2004 iransaction Date 4/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $936.00 Refer 42704 WORLD CLASS W/NES, tNc°RPo -1138- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 148974 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 04/22/04 3:30 PM Page 17 E 609-49750~253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,413.50 4/15/2004 4/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,413.50 Refer 42704 ZIEGLER, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract STRAINER/SEAL Invoice PC000690487 4/16/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery NOZZLE/CAP invoice PC000689613 4/14/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA ASPHALT ROLLER Invoice J2359501 4/10/2004 PO 18218 $36.37 $29.60 $28,978.65 Transaction Date 4/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29,044.62 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $80,266.31 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $12,487.17 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $654.18 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $45,972.93 455 TIE 1-2 $15,395.67 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG $9,921.95 601 WATER FUND $11,180.84 602 SEWER FUND $25,772.33 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $62,886.52 670 RECYCLING FUND $12,565.00 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $204.40 $277,307.30 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $277,307.30 $277,307.30 -1139- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 4 72-31 g0 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: Apd121, 2004 Reconsideration of Action Approval Xcel CUP and Variance Applications Resolution No. 04-44 C Background At its April 13, 2004 meeting, City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-44 approving the CUP and variance(s) applications from Xcel Energy to allow expansion of the substation located on Lynwood Boulevard Immediately following the meeting, Xcel and Staff verified that the height of the existing fence is actually (7) feet. Therefore, following discussion with the City Attorney, it was determined to bring the resolution back to the City Council to clarify the proposed fence height as referenced in the findings of fact and include the item on the Consent Agenda. Therefore, City staff has revised the resolution to reflect the proposed fence height and has also included the legal description which was discussed as part of the 4/13. Recommendation City staff respectfully requests that the City Council approve the amended resolution. Attachments · Resolution No. 04-44 -1140- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER D/B/A XCEL ENERGY TO ALLOW EXPANSION AND UPGRADE OF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 547'1 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD P & Z CASE # 04-0'1 and #04-02 PID: #13-'1'17-24-33-0037 and #'13-117-24-33-0097 WHEREAS, the applicant, Northern States Power d/b/a Xcel Energy has submitted a Conditional Use Permit application to allow expansion and' upgrade of the existing substation located at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard; and WHEREAS, applications were also submitted requesting variance approval to address the following site related issues: Building Height Electrical structures Lighting shield extensions Fence Height ;and Allowed / Existin.q Proposed Variance 35 FT / 33 FT 46 FT 11 FT 35 FT /63 FT 81 FT 18 FT 6FT /8FT 8FT 2FT WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned I-1 Industrial and subject to the provisions of City Code 350:655 and electrical substations are allowed upon approval of a conditional use permit; and -1141 - WHEREAS, the electrical substation qualifies as an essential service building as defined in City Code Chapter 350:455, Subd. 2 and is therefore not subject to the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements of the I-1 District; and WHEREAS, as electrical substations are allowed by conditional use, the City may place design, size, location and coverage restrictions and may require that the coverage and setbacks conform as close as practical to those otherwise required in the district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its March 1, 2004 and March 15, 2004 meetings and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance applications subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the conditional use permit and variance applications and makes the following findings of fact: ao National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) requires a minimum fence height of (7) feet which exceeds the City Code requirement of (6) feet in the I-1 District. c. The use of brick for the exterior of the control is consistent with the City Code regulations. The relocation of the control building to the southwest corner will help screen the electrical equipment and will also provide a backdrop for the landscaping plantings. e. The publication and mailing requirements for the public hearing as set forth in the City Code were satisfied. f. The revised landscaping plan prepared by HKGi was favorably received by the Planning Commission and Staff. g. The height of the electrical structures and lighting shield extensions is the minimum amount possible to accomplish the intended task. -1142- The conditional use permit and variance applications are approved subject to the following conditions: a. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. b. The screening materials shall be black. c. The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all required permitting activities. d. The proposed control building shall be brick. All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. This conditional use permit and variance is approved for the following legally described property: This conditional use permit and variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County and shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variances hereby granted will be null and void unless within one year of the date of this resolution: (a) the use permitted has been completed or utilized; or (b) a petition for extension of the time has been approved by the City Council For the purpose of this paragraph, the use will be deemed utilized on the date on which grading activities are commenced to prepare the property for the installation of the electrical substation. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember -1143- C The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk C -1144- CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and the City Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: ~1. As such officer, I have the legal cUstody of the original record from which the attached and forgoing extract was transcribed. 2. I have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. I find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on the date indicted in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: RESOLUTION NO. 04-44 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER D/B/A XCEL ENERGY TO ALLOW EXPANSION AND UPGRADE OF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD P&Z CASE #04-01 AND #04-02 PID #13-117-24-33-0037 AND #13-117-24-33-0097 Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on the 13th day of April, 2004. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 19th day of Apdl, 2004. Bonnie Rifler, City Clerk -1145- C CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04-44 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER D/B/A XCEL ENERGY TO ALLOW EXPANSION AND UPGRADE OF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD P & Z CASE # 04-01 and #04-02 PID: #13-117-24-33-0037 and #13-117-24-33-0097 WHEREAS, the applicant, Northern States Power d/b/a Xcel Energy has submitted a Conditional Use Permit application to allow expansion and upgrade of the existing substation located at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard; and WHEREAS, applications were also submitted requesting variance approval to address the following site related issues: Building Height Allowed / Existing ,proposed Variance Electrical structures Lighting shield extensions 35 FT / 33 FT 46 FT 11 FT 35 FT /63 FT 81 FT 18 FT Fence Height 6 FT / 8 FT 8 FT 2 FT ;and WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned I-1 Industrial and subject to the provisions of City Code 350:655 and electrical substations are allowed upon approval of a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the electrical substation qualifies as an essential service building as defined in City Code Chapter 350:455, Subd. 2 and is therefore not subject to the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements of the I-1 District; and 1 -1146- Resolution No. 04-44 WHEREAS, as electrical substations are allowed by conditional use, the City may place design, size, location and coverage restrictions and may require that the coverage and setbacks conform as close as practical to those otherwise required in the district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its March 1, 2004 and March 15, 2004 meetings and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance applications subject to conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the conditional use permit and variance applications and makes the following findings of fact: a. The existing fence is (8) feet in height and the proposed new fence does not exceed the existing condition. National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) requires a minimum fence height of (7) feet which exceeds the City Code requirement of (6) feet in the I-1 District. c. The use of brick for the exterior of the control is consistent with the City Code regulations. The relocation of the control building to the southwest comer will help screen the electrical equipment and will also provide a backdrop for the landscaping plantings. e. The publication and mailing requirements for the public hearing as set forth in the City Code were satisfied. f. The revised landscaping plan prepared by HKGi was favorably received by the Planning Commission and Staff. g. The height of the electrical structures and lighting shield extensions is the minimum amount possible to accomplish the intended task. The conditional use permit and variance applications are approved subject to the following Conditions: a. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. b. The screening materials shall be black. 2 -1147- C CI Resolution No. 04-44 c. The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all required permitting activities. d. The proposed control building shall be brick. All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. This conditional use permit and variance is approved for the following legally described property: 13-117-24-33-0037 13-117-24-33-0097 Lots 29-31, Koehler's Addition to Mound Lots 27,28, Koehler's Addition to Mound o This conditional use permit and variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County and shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. o The variances hereby granted will be null and void unless within one year of the date of this resolution: (a) the use permitted has been completed or utilized; or (b) a petition for extension of the time has been approved by the City Council For the purpose of this paragraph, the use will be deemed utilized on the date on which grading activities are commenced to prepare the property for the installation of the electrical substation. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of April, 2004. /si Bonnie Ritter Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk /s/Pat Meisel Pat Meisel, Mayor 3 -1148- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: Apd121, 2004 Re: Submittal of ERF Grant Application - Auditor's Road District Background As the City Council may be aware, MHRD and City staff recently met with representatives with Hennepin County / Metropolitan Council / Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) to discuss grant strategies for the downtown redevelopment projects which can be funded by either grants and/or matching funds. Based on discussions with agency staff, the City was encouraged to submit an application to Hennepin County to request grant funding to undertake contamination testing and development of a Response Action Plan (RAP) for the Auditor's Road District so as to facilitate the proposed construction of the hotel in Fall 2005. If the Council recalls, a similar grant application was awarded to the City of Mound in December 2001 for the Maxwell property on Shoreline Drive. As the City Council may be aware, the RAP reports for the Lost Lake District were recently submitted to the MPCA for review and pending approval. Recommendation Staff respectfully requests that the City Council approve the draft resolution which has been prepared to authorize submittal of an application to Hennepin County to request grant funds to undertake environmental testing and preparation of a RAP to be submitted on or before May 1, 2004 for the Auditor's Road District. -1149- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING SUBMITTAL OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT APPLICATION FOR PREPARATION OF A PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT AND PREPARATION OF A RESPONSE ACTION PLAN (RAP) FOR THE AUDITOR'S ROAD DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Mound is undertaking redevelopment efforts in its downtown area and has entered into a preliminary development agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development for development of the Lost Lake, Auditor's Road, and Lake Langdon Districts; and WHEREAS, the Auditor's Road District is a high priority redevelopment site with potential contamination issues and no apparent source of testing, clean-up or acquisition funding; and WHEREAS, the proposed hotel, which is scheduled to begin construction in Fall 2005, is located in the Auditor's Road District; and WHEREAS, goals of Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant appear to mesh with the need and desire to acquire and conduct environmental testing in the Auditor's Road District. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota to approve the environmental financial grant application for acquisition and environmental testing of the Auditor's Road District submitted to the Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services on May 1, 2004. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: -1150- The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this April 27, 2004 Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter -1151 - Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services 417 North Fifth Street, Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1397 612-348-3777, REDUCE.REUSE.RECYCLE 612-348-8532, Fax 612-348-6500, Facility INFO Line www. co.hennepin.rn ri.us/environmental C C SARAH SMITH MOUND (crr¥ OF) 5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364 RE: Spring 2004 Environmental Response Fund Grant Applications due May 1 Dear Ms/Mr. SMITH: Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services is now accepting applications due May l~t for the Spring 2004 Environmental Response Fund (ERF) grant round. The ERF grant program provides semi-annual grant cycles for the investigation and cleanup of contaminated property in Hennepin County. Applications are due on May 1 and November 1. Funding comments will vary with approximately $500,000-$700,000 to be distributed per grant round. To date, Hennepin County has completed five ERF funding cycles and has awarded 61 grants for a total of $4,342,199. The ERF is funded by mortgage registry and deed taxes, and is awarded on a competitive basis. Priority is given to the following types of projects: Contaminated, or potentially contaminated sites where the preferred end use is as publicly owned property (e.g. park space, schools, and municipal buildings) or residential property. Affordable housing projects where contamination issues preclude development or reuse. Infill brownfield properties or orphan sites that are generally not attractive to large development, but disrupt the fabric of community life and contribute to blight. Eligible applicants for the ERF include municipalities, economic development agencies, housing and redevelopment authorities, non-profit organizations, public companies, and private individuals and companies. ERF grants are not available to non-local government responsible parties. ERF grants are available for the investigation or cleanup of non-petroleum contamination or petroleum-related contamination that is not eligible for reimbursement by the Minnesota Petrofund; Hennepin County Environmental Services currently has an additional EPA-funded Brownfield Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund program available to assist with the investigation and clean up of contaminated sites. Both of these programs are described in the attached brochure, along with a variety of programs designed to provide financial and technical assistance to make the most out of your unused or under-utilized lands. Please contact David Jaeger at (612) 348-5714 or david.jaeger~co.hennepin.mn.us if you are interested in any of the funding sources referenced in this letter or visit our website at http://www.hennepin.us and use keyword search - ERF. Sincerely, Philip C. Eckhert Director An Equal Opportunity Employer -1152- Recycled Paper ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND The Environmental Response Fund (ERF) funds environmental-related assessment and cleanup) of sites throughout Hennepin County where such activities have been hampered because there is no other source of funding, a public non-tax-generating end use is intended, and/or affordable housing is being created or preserved. Projects targeted by the ERF typically rank Iow in terms of funding priority when using the tax-base increase4ob creation criteria applied by the Minnesota Depart- ment of Employment and Economic Development and Metropolitan Council environmental assessment and cleanup grant programs. Program Guidelines: · There are two ERF funding cycles per year. Applications for funding are due on May 1 st and November 1 st. Grants are awarded on a competitive basis. · Hennepin County expects to award a minimum of $500,000 per funding cycle. Individual grant awards have ranged from $5,200 to $683,000. · Grants can be used to fund soil and ground water assessment/ cleanup. Asbestos and lead paint assessment/abatement for affordable housing projects also can be funded. · Grants can be awarded to municipalities and non-profit ~)rganizatJons, as well as individuals and public and private companies that are not considered to be responsible parties for the contamination. * A resolution of support from the governing body of the municipality in which the site is located must accompany the application. For more information, call Dave Jaeger at 612-348-5714. 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: Apd121, 2004 Re: Submittal of DEED Grant Application - True Value District Background As the City Council may be aware, City staff recently met representatives with Hennepin County / Metropolitan Council / Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) to discuss grant strategies for the City's redevelopment projects which can be funded by either grants and/or matching funds. Based on discussions with agency staff, the City was encouraged to submit an application to DEED to request grant funding to undertake contamination testing and development of a Response Action Plan (RAP) for the proposed multi-use site in the True Value District which would include a farmer's market/parking deck / transit station. As the Council is aware, the site is included and referenced in the approved 1991 Mound Visions Plan. Recommendation Staff respectfully requests that the City Council approve the draft resolution which has been prepared to authorize submittal of an application to DEED to request grant funds to undertake environmental testing and preparation of a RAP to be submitted on or before May 1, 2004 for the proposed multi-use site located in the True Value District in downtown Mound. -1154- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-m RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUESTING FUNDING FOR PREPARATION OF A PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT AND RESPONSE ACTION PLAN (RAP) ASSOCIATED WITH A MULTI-USE FACILITY IN THE TRUE VALUE DISTRICT IN DOWNTOWN MOUND TO INCLUDE A FARMER'S MARKET, DESIGNATED PARK AND RIDE STALLS, A PARKING DECK AND A TRANSIT STATION WHEREAS, the adopted Mound Visions Plan references the needs for appropriate locations for a farmer's market, transit station, parking lot/deck and park and ride amenities in the downtown area; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Mound HRA have entered into a Preliminary Development Agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development for development of the Lost Lake, Auditors Road, and Lake Langdon Districts in the downtown area; and WHEREAS, the proposed redevelopment project will displace the existing Metro Transit shelter, park and ride lot and farmer's market; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that a multi-use facility in the True Value District will provide an excellent location for a farmer's market and will also alleviate potential future parking shortages by providing additional spaces for both surrounding retail uses and park & ride users; and WHEREAS, a future transit shelter in the True Value District can be easily integrated with a farmer's market facility as it has strong synergies with the future regional trail and municipal parking deck; and WHEREAS, the proposed multi-use facility, which needs to be constructed in 2005 if possible as the farmer's market, transit shelter and park and ride lot are being eliminated due to the pending MHRD projects; and WHEREAS, the goals of the DEED grant appear to mesh with the need and desire to acquire and conduct environmental testing in the True Value District; and' -1155- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to authorize the submittal of a grant application to DEED to request funding to provide funds for environmental testing and preparation of a RAP in the True Value District associated with construction of a multi-use facility to include locations for a farmer's market, a transit shelter and parking deck to include designated stalls for park and ride use. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of April 2004. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -1156- O~ ~'G~O~ Po .e_.m.o 0 0~ ~ ~0 z Z 0 Z 0 O' -11E ~z~ 0 ~ o~z~ 0 n~ o~ ~'< (I) O. I 0 , 0~' ~z F' 0 ~'~0 -1158- e,9. n -r ~ ~ m "1' smD CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www:c!tyofmound.com April 20, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bonnie Ritter RE: Annual License Applications I am asking for approval of the following licenses (license year May 1 through April 30), contingent upon receipt of all forms and fees: Restaurant License Subway Sandwich & Salads Al & Alma's Supper Club House of Moy Caribou Coffee #197 American Legion Club .Domino's Pizza LLC #1974 V.F.W. Post #5113 SKD, Inc., d/b/a Carbone's Pizzeria Happy Garden Scotty B's Restaurant Dailey's Pub Java Lounge Amusement Devices License V.F.W. Post #5113 American Legion Post 398 printed on recycled paper -1159- CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (61:2) 337-9310 fax http://www, kennedy-graven.com ROBERT J. LINDALL : ::. At~omC~atLaw Direct Dial (612) 33%9219 Certified Real Property Law Specialist April 22, 2004 Carlton Moore Director of Public Works City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Transmitted Via Email: carltormaoore@cityofiuound.com City of Mound v. Balboa Center Limited Partnership, et al. Hennepin County District Court File No. CD-2738 Parcel 18 - 5424 Shoreline Drive - Roger W. Reed & Jean M. Reed Dear Carlton: As we discussed today please ask the City Council to authorize the conveyance by the City to Roger W. Reed of the exclusive permanent driveway easement obtained by the City in the above- captioned matter. The easement was acquired from Balboa Center Limited Partnership, encumbering Parcel 14, located at 5300 Shoreline Drive for the benefit of Parcel 18, owned by Roger W. Reed at 5424 Shoreline Drive. I have been advised by Roger Reed that I need to revise the deed, so I will forward a revised deed to you. Please ignore the form of deed which I sent you a few days ago. RJL:gak Enclosure cc: John Cameron John Dean RJL-246908vl MU200-92 -1160- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-__ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN EXCLUSIVE · PERMANENT DRIVEWAY EASEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Mound acquired from Balboa Center Limited Partnership, Parcel 14 located at 5300 Shoreline Drive; and WHEREAS, it is determined that a permanent driveway easement is required for the benefit of Parcel 18, 5424 Shoreline Drive; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: The conveyance of the exclusive permanent driveway easement for the benefit of Parcel 18, 5424 Shoreline Drive, to owner Roger W. Reed is hereby approved. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver said permanent driveway easement as required to carry out this resolution. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of April, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -1161 - RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT YARD AND LAKESIDE SETBACK VARIANCES; DENYING A HARDCOVER VARIANCE FOR A COMPREHENSIVE REMODEL OF THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 4520 DENBIGH ROAD, LOT 3 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY HALF OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2, AVALON PID # 19-117-23 24 0100 P & Z CASE #04-03 WHEREAS, the applicants, Tim Olson and Lisa Wallace, have submitted an application for front, rear yard (lakeside) and hardcover variances to construct a garage addition and undertake a comprehensive remodel of the existing house at 4520 Denbigh Lane. The associated variances identified are as follows: Proposed Required Variance Front yard 12.8 feet 20 feet 7.2 feet Rear yard (lakeside) 43 feet 50 feet 7 feet Hardsurface coverage 3011 sq. ft. 2685 sq. ft (max.) 326 sq. ft. ; and WHEREAS, the property is located within an R-lA Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires a minimum of 6000 square feet of lot area, 40 feet of street frontage, a 20 feet front yard setback, and 6 feet side yards for lots of record; and WHEREAS, the proposed house remodel project has four levels designed to integrate with the sloping site conditions. The majority of the house fits within a 30' x 48' pad. A 24' x 29' attached garage has living space above it as well. The 3-stall garage utilizes a side entry drive. The street side garage wall has the proposed 12.8 foot front yard setback. A 2-level lakeside deck (13' x 36') is proposed on the channel side of the home; and WHEREAS, the property was created through approval of a minor subdivision as set forth in Resolution #01-31; and -1163- C WHEREAS, the existing house has a 56 feet OHW setback. The proposed house would maintain the existing house setback but add a lakeside deck; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended that the Council approve the lake side variance and deny the front yard and hardcover variances as requested by the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the front yard and lakeside ordinary high water mark setback variances as requested with the following conditions: a. The City Engineer review grading and drainage issues at the time of building permit. b. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of all costs associated with the variance request. c. The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary building permits. d. Payment of park dedication fees of $1100 at the time of building permit in the event they were not previously collected with the approval Resolution #01-31. One street unit charge in the amount of $1,170.90 shall be paid in the event they were not previously collected with the approval of Resolution #01-31. f. Any deficient sanitary sewer or watermain unit charges should be collected. 2. The City Council adopts the following findings in support of the front yard and lakeside ordinary high water mark setback variances: a. The side entry garage addresses parking concerns present along Denbigh Road. A 20 feet setback would push the house further down the slope of the property which could cause a difficult transition from the street to garage. Co The lakeside setback variance in minimal in distance and the deck structure adds minimal structure bulk which could interfere with lakeside sightlines. d. The lakeside deck has a reasonable depth to allow use and enjoyment of the property and surrounding lakeshore environment. -1164- 3. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: LOT 3 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY HALF OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2, AVALON This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). The City Council does hereby deny the hardcover variance as requested by the applicant as recommended by Staff and makes the following findings of fact regarding the request: a. The proposed home improvements are being created by the applicant and do not represent a pre-existing condition. b. The approval of Resolution #01-31 anticipated hardcover conformance with the 30% non-lot of record maximum. c. There are alternatives available to reduce the amount of hardcover while allowing proposed home design to be constructed. d. The proposed home design affords the property owners reasonable use of their residential property. 8. This variance is denied for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: LOT 3 AND THE NORTHEASTERLY HALF OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2, AVALON The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: -1165- Adopted April 27, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk C -1166- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 21, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance' Request - New House Construction OWNER / APPLICANT: Scot and Jacqueline Kirk PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-06 LOCATION: 2163 Fairview Lane PID: 13-117-24-43-0070 ZONING: R-lA Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY The subject site located at 2163 Fairview Lane includes a single-family dwelling that is to be demolished so as to allow construction of a new 2-story walkout home and lakeside deck in the same approximate location. As the existing structure is non- conforming due a deficient setback of (6) feet from Lakeside Boulevard on the north side, the project requires requesting variance approval. The requested variance is outlined as follows: Proposed Required Variance Front Setback 6 feet (Unimproved Lake Blvd) 20 feet 14 feet PROJECT DETAILS Details regarding the project are outlined in Planning Report No. 04-06 which has been included as an attachment. -1167- PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW In general, the majority of the discussion by the Planning Commission focused on the City Code and the practical difficulty it has created when applied to the subject lot including, but not limited to, the following issues: The property is located at the intersection of two public streets including Fairview Lane and Lake Boulevard and is therefore subject to double front setbacks of (20) feet on each elevation. Fairview Lane has historically been considered to be the "front" of the lot. However, the definition of the "front" is deemed to be that portion of a street having the least width. Therefore, Lake Boulevard, which is unimproved, is technically deemed to be the front of the lot. Based on review of the property files, Lake Boulevard has been viewed as "Commons" property in the past but was actually platted and dedicated as a street according to review of the original plat by Staff. Members of the Planning Commission discussed the status of the unimproved streets and the application of the setback requirements and discussed increasing the setback along Lake Boulevard to (10) feet. Details regarding the Planning Commission's review are contained in the April 19th meeting minute excerpts which have been provided as an attachment. -1168- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW A (10) FOOT FRONT SETBACK FROM LAKE BOULEVARD FOR THE NEW HOUSE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 2163 FAIRVlEW LANE P & Z CASE # 04-06 PID # 13-117-24-43-0070 WHEREAS, the applicant, Scot Kirk, has requested a variance to allow construction of a new single-family dwelling located at 2163 Fairview Lane; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires a (20) foot front setback for principal structures in the R-lA Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the subject property includes frontage on both Fairview Lane and Lake Boulevard and is therefore subject to double front setbacks of (20) feet along each street; and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting variance approval to allow a (6) foot front setback from Lake Boulevard which is currently unimproved; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 530:530, Subd. 1 states that a variance may be issued to provide relief to a landowner where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his/her property if certain circumstances exist; and WHEREAS, the property currently includes an existing single-family dwelling which is also non-conforming and located six (6) feet from Lake Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to demoliSh the existing structure and construct the new home in generally the same location; and -1169- C WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its April 19, 2004 meeting as required by the City Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance subject to the conditions recommended by Staff and on the basis that the front setback for the new structure be increased from (6) to (10) feet on the north side so as increase green space on the lakeside on the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the requested variance and makes the following findings of fact: A. Fairview Lane is largely unimproved to the north. B. Lake Boulevard is unimproved and therefore allows for a larger setback to the lake and will never be built on. C. Impact to the north side of the property is minimized. The property is located at the intersection of two public streets including Fairview Lane and Lake Boulevard and is therefore subject to double front setbacks of (20) feet on each elevation. Eo Fairview Lane has historically been considered to be the "front" of the lot. However, according to the City Code, the definition of the "front" is deemed to be that portion of a street having the least width. Therefore, Lake Boulevard, which is unimproved, is technically deemed to be the front of the lot. Historically, Lake Boulevard has been viewed as "Commons" property and has been included in the City's shoreline count however based on review of the original plat by City Staff, it was platted and dedicated as a public street. The new dwelling, which is to be constructed (10) feet from Lake Boulevard, will improve the current condition as the existing home is located (6) feet from the front property line along Lake Boulevard. H. The City Code allows stairs to be located within two (2) feet of any lot line. -1170- I. The proposed new structure will be located approximately 71 feet to the OHWM elevation of 929.4 which exceeds the 50-foot lakeshore setback requirements. J. Hardcover on the site will be within (40) percent for lots of record following construction of the new dwelling. K. With the exception of the front setback variance from Lake Boulevard, the proposed new structure meets the setback requirements for principal dwellings in the R-lA District. L. The criteria for granting a variance as set forth in City Code Chapter 350:530 have been met. 2. This variance is approved subject to the following conditions: A. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. B. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. C. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. D. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. E. Applicant shall be responsible for preparation of an as-built survey prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. F. The building plans shall be revised to reflect the deck modifications as outlined on the revised survey dated April 14, 2004 for review by the Building Official as part of building permit application process. 3. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: See Exhibit A. 4. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. -1171- Adopted April 27, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk C -1172- Exhibit A Lot 2, Block 2, L.P. Crevier's Subdivision of part of Lot 36, Lafayette Park, except the West 20 feet and also except the South 8 feet of the East 20 feet; thereof, HennePin County, Minnesota; AND Lot 16, Block 2, LiP. Crevier's Subdivision of part of Lot 36, Lafayette Park, except the South 8 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. -1173- MINUTE EXCERPT MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 19, 20O4 (NOT APPROVED) BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-06 VARIANCE 2163 FAIRVlEW LANE SCOT AND JACQUELINE KIRK Applicant requests a 14-foot front setback variance to allow construction of a new home at the same site as the current home, Property fronts Lake Boulevard on the north side. Lake Boulevard is an unimproved dedicated street that generally serves as the backyard for the subject property. Staff recommends approval of the variance subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application, 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits, 5. An as-built survey must be submitted including a final computation of hardcover. Discussion Miller asked if the house could be moved back towards the garage. Smith replied that the house has always been in its current location and conformance to the setback would push it out of line with the rest of the neighbors. It would also eliminate the green space between the house and garage. Mueller asked if the homes on either side are 6 feet from their lot lines. Smith indicated they appeared to be but it hasn't been verified. Scot Kirk (applicant) confirmed that the property lines are at an angle. Aesthetically, he feels it's important to keep it in line with everyone else. -1174- Osmek was concerned about the sight lines for the neighbor to the west. It was a consensus that keeping the house in the present location would not adversely affect the view. Ayaz thought that the variance made good sense but the case for hardship seems weak. It was also pointed out that the double front, due to Lake Boulevard, is a hardship in itself. Mueller has a difficult time with this one. All the issues brought up are good ones but there is a conforming location for the house. He feels that the setback needs to be more than 6 feet. He would prefer 10 feet. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Ayaz, to recommend Council approve a 10 foot set back from the north property line subject to staff recommendations. MOTION carried. Voting for: Ayaz, Miller, Schwingler, Mueller and Osmek. Voting against: Glister, Michael and Hasse. Findings of fact: Fairview Lane is largely unimproved to the north. Lake Boulevard is unimproved and allows for a larger setback to the lake and will never be built on. Impact to the north side is minimized. -1175- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 15, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance Request- New House Construction OWNER I APPLICANT: Scot and Jacqueline Kirk PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-06 LOCATION: 2163 Fairview Lane PID: 13-117-24-43-0070 ZONING: R-lA Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY The applicant, Scott Kirk, has submitted a variance request to allow construction of a new single family home at 2163 Fairview Lane. The requested variance is outlined as follows: Proposed Required Variance Front Setback (Unimproved Lake Blvd) 6 feet 20 feet 14 feet EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject site includes.a single-family dwelling that is to be demolished so as to allow construction of a new 2-story walkout home and lakeside deck in the same approximate location. The existing house is non-conforming due to a deficient front setback of six (6) feet from Lakeside Boulevard on the north side. A detached garage was constructed in 1999 and is located in a conforming location. The garage structure will remain on the subject site. Fairview Lane is a dedicated public street and includes both improved and unimproved portions which abut the subject lot. Lake Boulevard is also a dedicated street which abuts the subject lot on the north side and is unimproved and generally serves as the backyard for the subject property. -1176- REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:530 Subd. I outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardshi,P_..o? ~)ractical difficultie.~ to the oroDertv owner~?..the use o~ nis~o,r_ her_~D~l. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A copy of an updated survey for the property from Paul Schoberg Land Surveying dated November 2003 and revised April 14, 2004 has been provided and includes the legal description of the subject property. 60-DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. The variance application was received and deemed to be complete on February 20, 2004. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the City executed a 60- day extension on April 9, 2004. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around April 16, 2004 to inform them of the variance request. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: City Engineer John Cameron The applicant will need to provide additional information regarding proposed grading activities at the time of building permit application including elevations along the retaining wall and drainage swale. -1177- Parks Supt. Jim Fackler Shoreline along Lake Boulevard is included in the City's Dock program. Please see attached excerpts from Use Plan for Public Land regarding Lake Boulevard / Fairview Lane area(s) which have been included. Public Works Director Moore No comments received. Police Chief Kurtz No objections. Building Official Matt Simoneau A building permit will be required including the submittal of all appropriate information. Fire Chief Pederson No comments received. Public Works Supt. Skinner Water and sewer services are to be disconnected prior to demolition. Staff understands that the water will be running temporarily to existing garage while construction of the new home is underway. This line will have to be reconnected from the new house to the garage when the new house is completed and the temporary line will need to be disconnected. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The subject property includes frontage on both Fairview Lane and unimproved Lake Boulevard. The house will front Fairview Lane and will be accessed via the existing driveway. The improved portion of Fairview Lane is located immediately east of the driveway area. The remaining unimproved portion of platted Fairview Lane which extends to the north is grassy and provides access to the neighborhood dock site. Based on review of the original plat by the City Attorney and City Engineer, Lake Boulevard was dedicated as a public street. However, it has historically functioned and been maintained as Commons and area is counted in the City's shoreline. -1178- 10. 11. 12. The standard front setback requirement of the R-lA District is (20) feet. However, because the subject property includes frontage on both Lake Boulevard (unimproved) and Fairview Lane, setbacks of (20) feet are required along both streets. The applicant's proposal meets the (40) percent hardcover allowance for "lots of record." Based on review of the property files for the subject lot, Fairview Lane has been historically deemed to be the front of the lot with Lake Boulevard (unimproved) being considered a side setback. The original application included a lakeside deck which included a zero (0) foot setback which was modified to the current variance request of six (6) feet. Additionally, the deck width was reduced from 12 feet to 10 feet and the proposed staircase / landing was relocated from the west side to the east side so as to maintain the same building line as the existing house. Members of the Commission are advised that the survey reflects the new conditions however the house plans have not been modified. Stairs can be located within (2) feet of any lot line. The proposed improvements will enhance the property and will improve the livability of the home. The proposed .new structure is generally situated in the same location and is in line with the adjacent structures. An open deck is considered to be a standard feature for lots with lakeside views. The issue of setback requirements from unimproved streets is included in the proposed Planning Commission project list for 2004. If the Planning Commission recalls, the City Code allows application of an appropriate side or rear setback for properties which abut fire lanes which do not exceed (15) feet in width. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the proposed variance to allow construction of a new single-family dwelling at 2163 Fairview Lane subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. -1179- 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. 5. An as-built survey be submitted including final computation of hardcover. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its April 19, 2004 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for review at its April 27, 2004 meeting. -1180- PAID. FEB ?, 3 Z004 Ct'D( OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION I ou u ...~,~;,:, Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of applicatior~ Planning Commission Date .f~r, ! _.~. ~.OO c( Case No. (~-'(~" City Council Date ~-~'r:J ?~'~ ~ ~::::)0 ¢ q , Please type or print legibly PROPER~ LEGAL Lot ~/I ~ Block Subdivision ~ r ~ ~ ~ (~ 0 ,,, ZONING DISTRICT R-1 ~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER Address THAN OWNER) Phone (H) ...(W) Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zomng procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (/~. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions." 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Vadance Application Page 1 of 3 -1181 - Case No. C 3. Do the existing structures comply with all,rea, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No'~,)~'f no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot are~', e't'c.): / SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ~)S E W ) '~ ft. ~2 ft. //4 ft. --Side Yard: ( N ~-"~ ) "~,(~) fi:. "~,C) ft. ,J/Tv/'~ ft. Side Yard: ( N S E~ ~'2 ft. / ~ fi:. ~ ff. Rear Yard: (I~E W ) j ~-- ft. -'~ ~.- ft. ~q ~ ft. Lakeside: ~S E W ) ~'~.,7 ft. ~' O ft. [/q .J~'-' ft. · (NSEW) fi:. fi:. fi:. Street Frontage: /'~(J ft. ~( ft. ft. Lot Size: ~oO '-?0 sq fi: ~;,~ 70 sq fi: sq ft Hardcover: ~ ~--~ sq fi: ~ ( ~'~ .sq ft --- ~'O sq ft 4. Does the prese,nt/use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (,~), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: C 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil '(~) too small ( ) drainage .~existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape (X),,,other: specify Please describe: ~4 ~'~ ~-~ i:fV¢~"'" C(. ~f~rr~ Page 2 of 3 -1182- Case No. 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? I ceNi~ that all of the above statements and the statements containe~ in any requ~re~ papers or p~ans to submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the ent~ in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the Ci~ of Mound Dr the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's signature Applicant's Signature Date Variance Application Page 3 of 3 -1183- C .... LEGAL DESCRIPTION . Crevier's Subdivision of part of Lot 36, Lafayette Park, except the West 20 t%et and also except the South 8 feet of the i ~in County, Minnesota;. ? ....evier's Subdivision of part of Lot 36, Lafayette Park, except the South 8 ~et thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. O -- IRON MON. SET O = IRON MON. INPLACE PROPOSED INFORMATION GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. ~ J"',,/'./oYJ /~ ~'~', a 1ST FLOOR ELEV. 9~c/,.~ TOP BLOCK ELEV. '~ 3"a3, ~" BASEMENT ELEV. ~' y [ f 7' //o ~ £ £. --- %13~. ,~ ;.1'~.: -1184- PROPERTY ADDERS: OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA LOT AREA HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ....................................... I · SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. I t * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques am utilized, as oUtlined in Zoning Ordlnanc~ Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE ~ X ~ O' [] / ~-- ~_~CP X ~ DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) TOTAL HOUSE .. ' X [] DRIVEWAY, PAP. KING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening between boards) wilt a pervious surface under am not counted as hardcover. TOTAL DP,IVEWAY, ETC ........................................ ~ x ~ = ~ · X TOTAL DECK ....................................................... X /Zgo '7/7.. X[] TOTAL OTHEP, .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... OVER (indicate difference) Revised 11/18/03 DATE 5/0 -1185- This information sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City (3f Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 4-~2-0600. CI R-lA Zoning General Zoning Information Sheet District- Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS - Lot Area, Lot Width, and Setback Requirements: Minimum Lot Area ..................................... 6,000 sq~Jare feet Minimum Lot Width ............................................ 40 feet Front Yard Setback ............................................ 20 feet Side Yard Setback ............................................ 10 feet* Rear Yard Setback ............................................ 1 5 feet* Minimum Lot Depth ............................................ 80 feet Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback ............................. 50 feet Minimum Floor Area Requirement: ........................... 840 square feet Minimum lot frontaqe, on an improved public street shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall be 40 feet at the front building setback line (i.e. 20 feet back from front property line). *Applicable side or rear yard setbacks apply to lot lines abutting fire lanes or alleys not exceeding 15 feet in width. Building Height: Maximum 2¼ stories or thirty-f'i~'~:(35'i' fb~t in height. Building Height is defined as "the vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a fiat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, Cp O the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a itched or hip roof." LOTS OF RECORD - Special Provisions: Corner Lots: lot width minimum side yard setback 1 40 - 50 feet 10 feet 51 - 80 feet 20 feet 8 l~.f.,:eet or more 30 feet Side Yard Setback Requirements: tSide yard setbaCks for I~:~ of record shall be six (6) feet unless the structure or site does not contain a garage in which case, one side yar'd setback is required to be ten (1 0) feet to accommodate a driveway access. HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS: Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 30percent of the lot area. On existing lots of record*, impervious coverage may be permitted by a maximum of 40 percent providing that techniques are utilized as identified in Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1. Impervious cover is any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water or surface moisture, including all buildings, driveways and parking areas whether paved or not, tennis courts, sidewalks, patios and swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum opening between boards shall not be counted in impervious cover calculations. Rev, 3/97 -1186- III III III III III III Ill I1~ Ill Iii Iii Ill Ill Ill lllli UI Ill III II1 I11 III ~11 III Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill Ill III Ill Z-,I' :' . . .io,i .[-,ii 1 -1187- I Ill . Ill I t -1188- If ~69~-~/1~ Ecj6 /- .'u~ 'p u not/,l Leouop!so~J .>tJ!~l '~oos. [I [II · ~ I I I II ' I I I II · ~1' ii ~-~'~ " ~ I ' " .~. ?. ----il~-!--~ ......... .! -1189- CITY OF 'MOUND - ZONING 1NFOP, MATION SItEET SURVEY ON FILE? YES LOT OF RECORD?'( YES)/"'"~' NO ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: R1 10,000~..~.~ B1 7,500/0 'I~A 6,000/40y b2 20,000/80 R2 6,000/40 B3 10,000/60 R2 14,000/80 R3 SEE ORD. I1 30,000/100 REQUIRED EXISTING/PROPOSED EXISTING LOT SIZE: E LOT WIDTIt:- LOT DEPTH: VARIANCE IlOUSE ......... FRONT FRONT N S E W N S E W SIDE N S E W SIDE N S E w REAR N S E W LAKE N S E W TOP OF BLUFF GARAGE, $11ED ..... DETACIIED BUILDINGS FRONT N S E W FRONT N S E W SIDE N S E W SIDE N S E W REAR LAKE TOP OF BLUFF N SEW NS E W ,2.o I0' OR 30' IIARDCOVER 30% OR 40% I"¥: . 'n This Zoning Inlbrmation Sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in O~e City of blound Zoning Ordinance, For fur~er information, con~c[ Ihe City of Mound Pla~ing Department at 472-06~. A~A~A~g Li~OL~ ADOI?~O~ ?~ LAK~ PARK" Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 2 Hennepin Count, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 2/25/2004 at h00 PM READ IMPORTANT BISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Approximate PropertyApproximate Property Property ID Perimeter Area 13-t t7-24-43-0070 388 ft. 7,921 sq.ft. = 0.182 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2004) 2163 FAIRVIEW LA $ 326,000 $ 2,345.70 MOUND, MN 55364 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected ......................... i .......................... ~"": ........... :: The data contained on this page is dedved from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of matedal herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives.. Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612) 348-2618 or via e-mail at Bob. Moulder(~co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation. http://www 19. co.hennep.../esrimap, dll?name=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALUE= 131172443007 4/1/2004 -1191 - PROCEDURE HANUAL - Public Land Permits Exhibit E p. 2of5 DEVON COMMON 10. ABERDEEN ROAD 11. ROANOKE POINT 12. ROANOKE ROAD 13. DEVON LANE 14. AM/~URST LANE 15. ROXBURY LANE 16. DEVON COMMON - WEST E. DREPdvB~OOD: "... have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as "Dreamwood" and we hereby dedicate to the owners of ~h~-"-~t~'-~'~-'-~-S-~-w~n-'--6~~ 't-h~---~X~'"P-i~-'-~i~ t~ avenues thereon shown. In witness whereof we have hereunto set our hands and seals this 28th day of May 1907." WIOTA. COMMON- south 17. GULL LANE 18. FINCH LAND 19. EAGLE LANE 20. DOVE LANE 21. CANARY LANE 22. BLUEBIRD LANE 23. AVOCET LANE 24. WIOTA COMMON - WEST END F® L.P. CREVIER~S SUBD~SION OF PART OF LOT 36 L~AYE~PARK: ". · . andwe hereby donate and dedicate to the pUblic use forever all the streets and avenues thereof as shown on the accompanying plat . . . this 29th day of December 1892. ~E BOULEVARD / PLATTED STREETS 25. 26. FAIRVIEW LANE CHATEAU LANE Ge LAKESIDE PARK A.L. CROCKER'S FIRST DIVISION: ,,... and we hereby donate and dedicate to the public use forever all the roads and avenues and streets hereon shown . . . this 26th day of November 1907." WATER BANK COMMON 27. 28. BREEZY ROAD TONKAWOOD ROAD LINDENHEIGIITS: ".. · and hereby donate and dedicate to the public use forever the streets, avenues, roads and park as shown on the annexed plat . . . this 30th day of December 1915. Rev. 6/15/95 -1192- PROCEDURE HANUAL - Public Land Permits Use Plan for Public Lands Exhibit D' p. I0 of 18 22730 - 22790 Location: Current Use: Proposed Use: 22790 - 23080 Location: Current Use: Proposed Use: 23080 - 23255 Location: ~Current Use: Proposed Use: 23255 - 23285 Location: Current Use: Proposed Use: 23285 - 23295 rev. 1125/94 CLASS 5 TYPE D,E MORTON CHANNEL. Morton Channel extends northerly from Lynwood Blvd. into Harrisons Bay. It is a dredge channel and was originally platted as Morton Avenue. About 300 feet long, and is thermally polluted by the cooling system for Tonka Toys machines. The dredge channel has eroded to almost the full width (60 feet) of the originally platted street. The area has become a winter-haven for water fowl. It provides for recreation and close observation/feed of ducks. CLASS 5,8 TYPE D APPLE PARK. Located at the end of Apple Lane. This park has eroded to two small portions of land. The one on the west is inaccessible except by water. The eastern portion has approximately 100 feet of lake front. It is being used as a resident permit dock area. The proposed usage is the same. CLASS 2,4,8 TYPE D FAIRVIEW PERMIT'DOCKING AREA. Located as an extension of Fairview ~' :~d extending to the west approximately 175 feet. ~ The area has 175 feet of l~e front and is approximately 80 feet wide. It exists a a well maintained grassy area and is being used for neighborhood dockage and fish~g. It has the potential of being developed into a neighborhood park/picnic area. CLASS 4,8 TYPE D CHATEAU LANE ACCESS. LOcated at the end of Chateau Lane. This area is used as a resident dock area. 10 FOOT WIDE FIRE LANF_3 - 20 - -1193- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE 204B.16 C BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: That the City Council hereby establishes the following locations as the designated polling places for the stated precincts in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 204B.16: Precinct #1 Mt. Olive Church 5218 Bartlett Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Precinct #2/4 Bethel United Methodist Church 2116 Commerce Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Precinct #3 Mound City Hall 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Precinct #5 Gillespie Senior Center 2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Precinct #6 Hennepin County Library 2079 Commerce Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of April, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -1194- 5341 Maywood ROad Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 21,2004 SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Review of Text Amendments to City Code - Temporary Membrane Structures (Continued from April 13, 2004 Meeting) APPLICANT: City of Mound BACKGROUND As the City Council is aware, the regulation of temporary structures (ie. hoop houses, canopies, etc.) was included on the 2003 Planning Commission project list. After being presented several drafts for review and discussion, the Planning Commission, at its November 17, 2003 meeting, expressed support for the current draft. Therefore, Staff was directed to proceed with the process for formal review of the proposed amendments. REVIEW PROCEDURE Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd. 3 states that no zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the planning agency or by the governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published at least (10) days prior to the hearing date. Members of the City Council are advised that the notice of public hearing was published in the Laker on April 3, 2004. City Code Section 350:520 also requires that any proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission for review and must not be acted upon until it has received the Planning Commission's recommendation. At its April 13, 2004 meeting, the City Council continued the public hearing for review of the proposed zoning amendments to April 27, 2004 so as to undertake some additional research regarding the UBC and its applicability to these types of structures. -1195- C REVIEW OF CiTY CODE AMENDMENT Preliminary Review. Members of the Council are advised that the proposed amendments to the City Code, as written, were reviewed preliminarily by the Planning Commission at its November t7, 2003 meeting. Discussion regarding the temporary buildings also took place at the May 19th and June 2nd meetings. Formal Review. The proposed amendments to the City Code were formally reviewed by the Planning Commission at its March 15, 2004 meeting and recommended for approval based on a 4 to 1 vote. The majority of the discussion at the Planning Commission focused on how the regulations would affect existing structures. Staff will comment further on this matter at the meeting. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends Council approval of the proposed amendments to the City Code (zoning ordinance) to regulate temporary membrane structures. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please refer to the memorandum dated April 15, 2004 from the former Building Official regarding the relationship between temporary membrane buildings and the UBC. In general, the UBC does not specifically regulate temporary membrane structures. Additionally, a building permit is not required as the structure doesn't qualify as an accessory building. If the structure met the required wind / snow load regulations and also included a permanent foundation, a building permit could be issued as long as setback / hardcover requirements were met. Staff will further comment on this matter at the meeting. 2 -1196- Memo To: From: Dat~: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Matt Simoneau, Building Official 4/15/2004 Temporary Membrane Structures (Hoop Houses) Sarah, The State Building Code does not specifically regulate temporary membrane structures. For your information accessory structures that are regulated by the Building Code are required to have a 30 pound roof snow load. They are also required to be constructed for an 80 mile per hour wind load. -1197- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 5, 2004 SUBJECT: Structures APPLICANT: Review of Text Amendments to City Code - Temporary Membrane City of Mound BACKGROUND As the City Council is aware, the regulation of temporary structures (ie. hoop houses, canopies, etc.) was included on the 2003 Planning Commission project list. After being presented several drafts for review and discussion, the Planning Commission, at its November 17, 2003 meeting, expressed support for the current draft. Therefore, Staff was directed to proceed with the process for formal review of the proposed amendments. REVIEW PROCEDURE Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd. 3 states that no zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the planning agency or by the governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published at least (10) days prior to the hearing date. Members of the City Council are advised that the notice of public hearing was published in the Laker on April 3, 2004. City Code Section 350:520 also requires that any proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission for review and must not be acted upon until it has received the Planning Commission's recommendation. REVIEW OF CITY CODE AMENDMENT Preliminary Review. Members of the Council are advised that the proposed amendments to the City Code, as written, were reviewed preliminarily by the Planning Commission at its November 17, 2003 meeting. Discussion regarding the temporary buildings also took place at the May 19th and June 2nd meetings. -1198- Formal 'Review. The proposed amendments to the City Code were formally reviewed by the Planning Commission at its March 15, 2004 meeting and recommended for approval based on a 4 to 1 vote. The majority of the discussion at the Planning Commission focused on how the regulations would affect, existing structures. As discussed with the City Attorney, the structures which pre-date the adoption of the new regulations would be subject to the non-conforming Provisions included in the City Code and state statute, .... RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends Council approval of the proposed amendments to the City Code (zoning ordinance) to regulate temporary membrane structures. 2 -1199- Page 1 of 1 Subd. le. Nonconformities. Any nonconformity, including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under this chapter, may be continued, including through repair or maintenance, but if the nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued for a period of more than one year, or any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other peril to the extent of greater than 50 percent of its market value, any subsequent use or occupancy of the land or premises shall be a c0n~grming use or occupancy. A municipality may by ordinance ±mpose;-upon-:nonconfor~t±es'~r~asonabI~-~reg~lati~nsto--prev~ht and abate nuisances and to protect the public health, welfare, or safety. This subdivision does not prohibit a municipality from enforcing an ordinance that applies to adults-only bookstores, adults-only theaters, or similar adults-only businesses, as defined by ordinance. C C http://www.revisor, leg. state, mn. us/cgi-bin/getstatch an. nl - 1200- 4/7/2O04 MEETING MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 15, 2004 DRAFT / NOT APRROVED CDD Smith presented the proposed final of the temporary membrane ordinance to the Planning Commission for their formal review. Smith identified some of the provisions that were discussed during the previous review. The Commissioners discussed potential issues such as setbacks and hardcover that may limit construction of these structures. Discussion ensued about how to address existing structures which pre-date the adoption of the new regulations. Staff commented that the nonconforming ordinance would address this concern but will also follow up with the City Attorney. MOTION by Michael, seconded by Miller to move the item to the City Council. MOTION carried. Voting for: Michael, Miller, Ayaz, and Schwingler~ Voting against: Osmek. - 1201 - DISCUSSION DRAFT CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -200 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350:435 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) AS IT RELA:TES TOTEMPORARY'M EM BRANESTRUCTURES The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 350:425 of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add a new Subdivision 6 - Temporary Membrane Structures Section 1. Definition. For purposes of this section, "Temporary Membrane Structure" means a temporary structure usually consisting of an aluminum, steel or plastic frame which is covered with a plastic, fabric, canvas or similar non-permanent material and is used to provide temporary storage of vehicles, boats, recreational vehicles or other personal property. The term shall also apply to temporary structures commonly known as hoop houses, canopy-covered carports and tent garages and can be fully or partially covered. E Section 2. Permit Procedure. No person shall place a temporary membrane structure on private property without first obtaining a permit from the City. Each structure placed in accordance with this section shall be issued a placard that must be prominently displayed indicating the date of placement and removal. Failure to obtain a permit or to post the placard shall be considered to be a violation of the City Code and subject to the penalties defined therein. Section 3. Fee. The permit fee shall be determined by the City Council as set forth in City Code Chapter 500. Section 4. Special Provisions. Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall be permitted uses in alt residential districts and shall be neutral colored (ie. dark green, tan, brown, etc.). b. There shall be no more than one (1) temporary membrane-covered building per property which shall not exceed 400 square feet. c. Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall not be placed on public property or in a location which obstructs traffic visability. d. Temporary membrane-covered structures shall meet the appropriate setbacks for accessory buildings as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. 1 - 1202- Temporary membrane structures shall also be included in hardcover calculations for residential properties and cannot exceed (40) percent for lots of record and (30) for non-lots of record. f. Hardcover regulations shall also apply to temporary membrane- g. Structure shall be adequately anchored and/or secured to the ground. Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall not be placed on residential property for more than (180) days within a (12) month period on a single premises unless an extension has been applied for (30) days prior to the expiration and is approved by the City Council Passed by the City Council this day of 200_. Published in The Laker the day of ,200_. Effective on ,200 . Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -1203- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY pLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 17, 2003 .... T~m~orary Membrane Structures General conformation was given of the direction staff is taking on this matter. - 1204- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, 2003. Proposed amendment- temporary buildings Ayaz thought the definition for temporary structure needed to be made clearer. Raines was in favor of stipulating storage structures must be out of sight. Mueller thought that should be out of sight from the street. 0smek wondered how many yards have the ability to comply because of the small size and varied topography. Mueller asked why someone who chooses to buy all this stuff is allowed to force the neighborhood to look at it? He doesn't want to look at hoop houses. It's also a safety issue. Osmek ~hought it was indicative of a blue-collar community. We might be forced to choose hoop houses or blue tarps - which one would be better. Raines felt it was reasonable that some controls could be put on blue-collar homeowners, Mueller said the boat sitting next to my house impedes my ability to enjoy my neighborhood. It is not legislating aesthetics. We are blue-collar community but have more lakeshore than any other community on Lake Minnetonka. We need to encourage letters from people if they don't want to come in. Use the City Contact to solicit opinions. Ayaz thought we could put an ad in the paper with an opinion survey to clip out and send in so it doesn't cost a lot. Mueller agreed that maybe we should do it as a Planning Commission, 0smek suggested we allow tarps and hoop houses from late fall to early spring. Allowed but regulated with a timeline. Ayaz observed that all this is as a result of the small lots. Can the city offer some alternative storage sites? Smith said that finance and availability of property are the issues. She will bring back a revised amendment for consideration. 4'"- 1205- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 19, 2003 OLD / NEW BUSINESS a~ R~ew and diSCUssion, temPo~ry accesso~ bUilding amendments "Hoop houses", "temporary structures", "outside storage structures" not regulated currently. Could require them to meet setbacks and hardcover. Other cities add additional criteria. We are proposing to regulate construction materials, specifically, in appropriate method and materials; similar or complement exterior finish of the principle structure; plastic, tarp or other non- permanent material is not allowed. What do we do with the existing ones? MOTION by Raines, seconded by Glister, to table the request. MOTION carded unanimously. C - 1206- DISCUSSION DRAFT CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2003 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350:435 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) AS IT RELATES TO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 350:425 is hereby amended to add a new Subdivision 6 - Construction Materials. A. Accessory buildings may be constructed of any material accepted by the Minnesota State Building Code which is appropriate to the application and the location. Bo Exterior materials and finish shall match or complement the exterior finish of the principal structure in materials, color and texture and shall be maintained in new or like new condition. Accessory buildings or temporary storage facilities constructed primarily of canvas, plastic fabric, or other similar non-permanent building materials shall be prohibited. Passed by the City Council this day of 2003. Published in The Laker the day of ,2003. Effective on ,2003. Attest: Bonnie Kitter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 12-0-7 - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTION 350:310 (DEFINITIONS) AND SECTION 350:435 (ACCESSORY BUILDINGS) OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) TO ADOPT REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRUCTURES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 to hold a public hearing to consider amending Section 350:310 (Definitions) and Section 350:435 (Accessory Buildings) of the Mound City Code (Zoning Ordinance) to adopt new regulations regarding the placement of temporary membrane structures as follows Subsection 350:310 (Definitions) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add a new definition for Temporary Membrane Structure as follows: A temporary structure usually consists of an aluminum, steel or plastic frame which is covered with a plastic, fabric, canvas or similar non- permanent material and is used to provide temporary storage of vehicles, boats, recreational vehicles or other personal property. The term shall also apply to temporary structures commonly known as hoop houses, canopy-covered carports and tent garages and can be fully or partially covered. Subsection 350:425 (Accessory Buildings) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add a new Subdivision 8 - Temporary Membrane Structures as follows: Ao Permit Procedure. No person shall place a temporary membrane structure on private property without first obtaining a permit from the City. Each structure placed in accordance with this section shall be issued a placard that must be prominently displayed indicating the date of placement and removal. Failure to obtain a permit or to post the placard shall be considered to be a violation of the City Code and subject to the penalties defined therein. Bo Fee. The permit fee shall be determined by the City Council as set forth in City Code Chapter 500 or by ordinance. C. Special Provisions. ao Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall be permitted uses in all residential districts and shall be neutral colored (ie. dark green, tan, brown, etc.). - 1208- There shall be no more than one (1) temporary membrane- covered building per property which shall not exceed 400 square feet. c. Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall not be placed on public property or in a location which obstructs traffic visability. do Temporary membrane-covered structures shall meet the appropriate setbacks for accessory buildings as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. so Temporary membrane structures shall also be included in hardcover calculations for residential properties and cannot exceed (40) percent for lots of record and (30) for non-lots of record. f. Hardcover regulations shall also apply to temporary membrane- covered structure. g. Structure shall be adequately anchored and/or secured to the ground. ho Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall not be placed on residential property for more than (180) days within a (12) month period on a single premise unless an extension has been applied for (30) days prior to the expiration and is approved by the City Council. Copies of the proposed amendments are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Published in The Laker on April 3, 2004. Jill Norlander, Planning and Inspections Secretary - 1209- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: March 10, 2004 SUBJECT: Structures APPLICANT: Review of Text Amendments to City Code - Temporary Membrane City of Mound BACKGROUND As the Planning Commission is aware, the regulation of temporary structures (ie. hoop houses, canopies, etc.) was included on the 2003 project list. After being presented several drafts for review and discussion, the Planning Commission, at its November 17, 2003 meeting, expressed support for the current draft. Therefore, Staff was directed to proceed with the process for formal review of the proposed amendments. REVIEW PROCEDURE Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd. 3 states that no zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the planning agency or by the governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published at least (10) days prior to the hearing date. City Code Section 350:520 also requires that any proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission for review and must not be acted upon until it has received the Planning Commission's recommendation. As the Planning Commission is aware, the City Council is responsible for holding the public hearing for review of all text amendments and rezoning according to the City Code. As of this date, the public hearing not been scheduled but will be set upon receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission. -1210- PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF CITY CODE AMENDMENT Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the proposed amendments to the City Code, as written, were reviewed preliminarily by the Planning Commission at its November 17, 2003 meeting. Discussion regarding the temporary buildings also took place at the May 19th and June 2"d meetings. Copies of the meeting minutes have been included as attachments. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the proposed amendments to the City Code (zoning ordinance) to regulate temporary membrane structure and direct Staff to schedule the public hearing to be held at an upcoming City Council meeting. -1211 - CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -200 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350:310 (DEFINITIONS) AND 350:435 (ACCESSORY BUILDINGS) OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) TO ADOPT REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY MEMBRANE STRUCTURES The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 350:310 (Definitions) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add a new definition for Temporary Membrane Structure as follows: A temporary structure usually consisting of an aluminum, steel or plastic frame which is covered with a plastic, fabric, canvas or similar non-permanent material and is used to provide temporary storage of vehicles, boats, recreational vehicles or other personal property. The term shall also apply to temporary structures commonly known as hoop houses, canopy-covered carports and tent garages and can be fully or partially covered. Subsection 350:425 (Accessory Buildings) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add a new Subdivision 8 - Temporary Membrane Structures as follows: Permit Procedure. No person shall place a temporary membrane structure on private property without first obtaining a permit from the City. Each structure placed in accordance with this section shall be issued a placard that must be prominently displayed indicating the date of placement and removal. Failure to obtain a permit or to post the placard shall be considered to be a violation of the City Code and subject to the penalties defined therein. Fee. The permit fee shall be determined by the City Council as set forth in City Code Chapter 500 or by ordinance. C. Special Provisions. ao Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall be permitted uses in all residential districts and shall be neutral colored (ie. dark green, tan, brown, etc.). b. There shall be no more than one (1) temporary membrane-covered building per property which shall not exceed 400 square feet. 1 -1212- c. Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall not be placed on public property or in a location which obstructs traffic visability. d. Temporary membrane-covered structures shall meet the appropriate setbacks for accessory buildings as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Temporary membrane structures shall also be included in hardcover calculations for residential properties and cannot exceed (40) percent for lots of record and (30) for non-lots of record. f. Hardcover regulations shall also apply to temporary membrane- covered structure. g. Structure shall be adequately anchored and/or secured to the ground. Temporary membrane-covered buildings shall not be placed on residential property for more than (180) days within a (12) month period on a single premises unless an extension has been applied for (30) days prior to the expiration and is approved by the City Council Passed by the City Council this day of 200_. Published in The Laker the day of ,200_. Effective on ,200_. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -1213- C 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: Apd121, 2004 Re: Contract for Consulting Services Between City of Mound and HKGi for Preparation of AUAR for MHRD Project C Background Hosington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) has submitted a contract in the amount of $121,510.00 for preparation of an Alternative Urban Area Review (AUAR) for the Mound Harbor Renaissance Development (MHRD) redevelopment project. The proposed project area includes the Lake Langdon, Auditor's Road, Lost Lake and True Value Districts and also includes the associated stormwater ponding areas which are adjacent to CSAH 15. The AUAR process is outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.3610. In general, it serves as a substitute environmental review to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) or Environmental Impact Statement (ELS) processes. Work on the AUAR is expected to begin on or around May 1 and should be complete by next fall. The AUAR will consider development under two scenarios including guidance under the existing Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations and the proposed development outlined in the current MHRD plan. Fee Reimbursement While the City of Mound will be serving as the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for the AUAR and will be responsible for contract execution with HKGi, all fees associated with the project will be reimbursed by MHRD. City Attorney Dean has prepared a formal agreement for MHRD to outline the terms associated with the project including submittal of an escrow deposit to offset immediate expenses which will be forthcoming and a reimbursement schedule. It is important to note that the City's contract for the AUAR project will be with HKGi. HKGi will be directly responsible for managing the list of subcontractors as outlined in the contract agreement as well as payment for all services provided. -1214- Recommendation Staff respectfully requests that the City Council approve the contract with HKGi in the amount of $121,510.00 for preparation of an AUAR for the downtown Mound project area with all costs to be reimbursed by MHRD. · Page 2 -1215- C April 21, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re,' Contract for Consulting Services Mound Visions AUAR Dear Ms. Hanson: This letter outlines a Scope of Services, Fee Schedule and other elements which together constitute an agreement between the City of Mound, hereinafter referred to as the CITY, and Hoisington Koegler Group Inc, (HKGi), hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT for professional planning services for preparation of a Comprehensive Plan, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: A. BASIC SERVICES HKGi has assembled a work program designed to complete an environmental review in the form of an "Alternative Urban Areawide Review" (AUAR) for the redevelopment of downtown Mound. An AUAR will satisfy the requirement for envir0mental reviews for individual development proposals within the project area that are consistent with the development asSUmptions and mitigation measures of the AuAR. MinnesOta Rules Section 4410.3610 oUtlines the AUAR Process which is a substitute for EAW or EIS review processes. This work program assUmes the City of Mound is the ReSPonsible GOvernmental Unit (RGU) for the preparation of the AUAR. The AUAR project area includes the Langdon, Auditor"s Road, Tm-Value, and Lost Lake Districts identified in Mound Visions. Associated stormwater ponding facilities adjacent to cotmtyRoad 15 are also included the project area. The AUAR will also serve as a docUment to fulfill necessary environmental revieWs for pf0Po~ed dredges to the Lost Lake Canal and other water oriented' activities. The previouslY aPProved Lost Lake Canal EAW project area is not included in the Mound Visions AUAR but'Will be used for valuable resource information. This work program considers development impacts in two scenarios, guidance under the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Re~lations and the proPosed Mound Harbor Renaissance (MHR) development plan. -1216- City of Mound Mound Visions AL[AR April 21, 2004 Page 2 Task 1 - Organize the effort Getting a good start to the project requires establishing a common understanding of the big, issues and community objectives and ensuring an open line of communication between all the necessary stakeholders and interest groups. This task includes developing a list of key public agency contacts, property owners and special interest groups who will need to be informed of the project and consulted at key points, and who will have the oppommity to review drafts of the AUAR prior to approval. The list will at a minimum satisfy Minnesota Rules Section '4410.1500 regarding publication and distribution of environmental reviews. Tasks include: 1.1 Develop a communication strategy that identifies public process, media releases and public feedback methods and includes the list of key stakeholders; 1.2 Conduct a meeting of key agencies to establish a preliminary framework of understanding about issues and specific objectives for the study. Agencies include MnDNR, Hennepin County Transportation Department, MPCA, MCWD, COE and LMCD. 1.3 Introduce the Mound Visions AUAR work program and schedule to the City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting. Deliverables: Refined work program with detailed project schedule · Communications strategy · Meeting summaries · List of stakeholders and AUAR distribution list Task 2 - Define the context (inventory). Environmental reviews requi~e significant inventory work to establish a firm base of information at the onset of the project. MUch of this information has been assembled for previous planning studies such as. the Mound Comprehensive Plan, the Lost Lake Canal EAW and proposed MHR development information. These documents will be reviewed and referenced in the AUAR. For the bulk of the project area, there is a wealth of mapping data available from regional and local data sources. Various layers of data will be assembled in a common GIS format so that they may be overlaid and analyzed in relationship, to each other. Some data that is not available or does not provide enough detail will be collected via field survey and entered into a GIS layer. Examples of data layers include land cover types, w~tlands, predominant aquatic and upland plant communities, fish and wildlife habitat areas, soils, exi~sting and planned land use, zoning, historic and cultural resources, utilities, roadway and traffic data. Tasks include: 2.1 Collect background data and mapping including geologic, ecological, cultural, infrastructure, transportation, traffic, land use and hardsurface. 2.2 Analyze existing infrastructure systems serving the study area (roadways, rail, water, power, sewer, storm sewer, etc.) and their related usage, capacities, etc. 2.3 Assemble traffic information based on available information and the proposed MHR development. -1217- Deliverables: GIS base map layers · Assembly of existing traffic counts and projections · Cultural Resource Inventory · Natural Resource Inventory · Meeting summaries Ci ty of Mound Mound Visions A UAR Apr,! 21, 2o04 Page 3 Task 3 - Describe the development scenarios. The AUAR needs to have a basis for evaluating development impacts. The approach is to prepare two development scenarios. One would be based on a full build or most intense development scenario allowed by the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations. The second approach considers development based on the proposed Mt-IR plan. Tasks include: 3.1 Describe the two development scenarios to be used as a basis for environmental review: a. A "worst-case" (most intense) development scenario using the Mound Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations. · b. The proposed MHR development plan. 3.2 Review options with City Staff for feedback and comment. Deliverables: * GIS map and written overview of the two development scenarios and associated development projections · Meeting summary. C Task 4 - Evaluate the impacts. Impacts of the two development scenarios will be evaluated to determine their impacts to built and natural conditions. This task will involve the project work necessary to provide responses to AUAR questions. Tasks include: 4.1 Evaluate public infrastructure (sewer, water, storm sewer) capacity requirements for the most intense and MHR development plan scenarios. 4.2 Evaluate roadway improvement requirements for the most intense and MI-IR development plan scenarios. 4.3 Evaluate dredge, overnight boat storage docks and recreational boat traffic impacts. 4.4 Review findings with City Staff. 4.5 Evaluate environmental, habitat, fish and wildlife impacts. 4.6 Evaluate historical and cultural impacts. Deliverables: · Transportation impacts and improvements needs · Utility impacts and improvement needs · Environmental impacts -1218- Historical and cultural resources impacts · Air and Noise impacts · Meeting summaries City of Mound Mound Visions A UAR April 2~, 2004 Page 4 Task 5 - Explore mitigation strategies. The AUAR Mitigation Plan addresses strategies to reduce the potential of negative impacts created by the development scenario(s). The prOject team wi11 collaborate to identify specific measures to mitigate development impacts on natural and physical systems. Tasks include: 5.1 Transportation system mitigatiOn strategies. 5.2 Utility system mitigation strategies. 5.3 Environmental impacts and mitigation strategies. 5.4 Cultural resources impacts and mitigation strategies. 5.5 Air and Noise impacts and mitigation strategies. 5.6 Meet With City staff to review feasibility of mitigation alternatives and refine mitigation strategy. 5.7 Conduct an agency meeting to revieW findings of Tasks 4 & 5 for comment and feedback. 5.8 Review findings of Tasks 4 & 5 with the City Council. DeliverableS: * Mitigation strategies · Meeting summary Task 6 - Draft the AUAR document. Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 Subpart 3 requires an official Order for Review by the RGU to prepare and distribute an AUAR. This task includes facilitating the Order for Review by the City Council, assembling the AUAR draft and reviewing it with the Task Force. Tasks include: 6.1 PreSent d°cument draft to the City Council for appro:egl and request that the Council take formal action (Order for Review) to conduct an AUAR. 6.2 Prepare the draft AUAR document according to Environmental Quality Board (EQB) rules and format. Deliverables: * Draft AUAR document * City Council resolution ordering AUAR review Task 7 - Facilitate the formal AUAR review process. UPOn completion of the draft AUAR and Mitigation Plan, HKGi will coordinate necessary' distribution for agency and public review. - 121-9- Ctg of Mound Mound Visions A LiAR April 21, 2004 Page5 Tasks include: 7.1 Print and distribute the draft AUAR to state, regional and local agencies and organizations for review. 7.2 Advertise the AUAR availability in the EQB Monitor. Advertisement begins a 30-day formal comment period. 7.3 Facilitate a public open house to answer questions about the AUAR and offer a forum for comments from the general public during the 30-day review. 7.4 Upon closing of the 30-day review period, provide a summary of questions and written responses to all substantive comments. Deliverables: · EQB Monitor adyertisement · Open house materials and summary · Summary of public questions and written responses to public.comments Task 8 - Facilitate adoption of the final AUAR. After completion of the 30-review period and response to written comments, the final AUAR and Mitigation Plan will be prepared for City Council adoption. Tasks include: 8.1 Meet with City staffto review comment responses and resolve any questions brought out by comments. 8.2 Update the AUAR with comment responses and print and redisffibUte t~ the agencies and organizations on' the original list plus all those who formally commented. 8.3 If no objections are filed within 10 working days of receipt of the final AUAR, present to the City Council for final adoption. Deliverables: · Final AUAR document · EQB Monitor advertisement C B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The CONSULTANT and the CITY may agree in writing to amend thig Contract for additional services related to the Project and compensation for' such services: The following services have not been requested by the CITY but are available, upon authorization, from the CONSULTANT. 1. Meetings in addition to those specified in Paragraph A above. 2. Services or Deliverables not specifically identified in Paragraph A above. - 1220- C. FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Cit2/ of Mound Mound Visions A LIAR Ap~121, 2004 De The cONsULTANT agreeS to comPlete the scope of work contained in Paragraph A in exchange for professional fee compensation as noted below. The CITY agrees to pay the CONSULTANT for services rendered as follows: For the CONSULTANT;S~Basic Services described in Paragraph A above, a fee based on the coNSULTANT'S current hOurly rate schedule (see Attachment A) not to exceed ONE HUNDRED TWENTY ONE THOUSAND FIvE HUNDRED AND TEN DOLLARS ($121,510.00), including reimbursable expenses, AUAR printing and distribution costs. For the CONSULTANT'S Additional Services described in Paragraph B, a fee based on the CONSULTANT'S current hourly rate schedule plus incidental expenses or a negotiated fee. Statements will be submitted to the CITY on a monthly basis as work is completed and shall be payable within 30 days in aCe0rdance with this Agreement. InVoices shall clearly delineate completed tasks and a breakdown of base services and any applicable additiOnal serviceS. 4. The CONSULTANT reserves the right to suspend services if the CITY is delinquent in making payments in accordance with this Agreement. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY The CITY shrill be responsible for the following: Assembly of background information including, but not limited to paper and/or digital copies of all former comprehensive plans, aerial photographs, base maps, inventory data, U.S. Census information, traffic and transportation information and available CAD/GIS mapping, limited to those that are reasonably available. 2. Mailing lists, printing, postage and the mailing of invitations for public meetings. 3. Arrangements for public meetings. 4. Reproduction of all interim reports for distribution to the City Council and other city boards and commissions. 5. Printing and distribution of associated communications. E. INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall maintain insurance as follows at all times during the term of this Agreement: Statutory workers compensation and employers' liability insurance coverage. Comprehensive general liability insurance coverage and automobile liability insurance coverage in the sum of not less than $1,000,000 per policy. - 1221 - City of Mound Mound Visions ALTAR Ap~121, 20O4 .Page 7' F. COMPLETION SCHEDUI,I*. The services of the CONSULTANT will begin upon CITY approval and will, absent of causes beyond the control of the CONSULTANT, be completed by December 31, 2004. At the beginning of the project, the CONSULTANT will prepare a detailed project schedule identifying meetings~ task completion dates, etc. The CONSULTANT will continually update the project schedule throughout the course of the work. G. .S. UBCONSULTANTS The Scope of Work will be completed by a project team under the direction of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. HKGi's subcon, sultants for the project include: Earth Tech, McCombs Frank Ross and Associates, Benshoof & Associates, David Brasiau Associates and 106 Group. No additional Subconsultants will be added to the team nor will any substitutions be made without written authorization from the City of Mound. C H. NONDISCRIMINATION The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate by reason of age, race, religion, 'color, sex, national origin, or handicap unrelated to the duties of a position, of applicants for employment or employees as to terms of ~mployment, promotion, demotion or'transfer, recruitment, layoff' or termination, compensation, selection for training, or participation in recreational and educational actiVities. C I. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY During the performance of this Contract, the CONS~TANT, in compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of Labor regulations 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The cONSULTANT shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants for employment are employed, and. that employees are Sea/ed during emPloyment, '~ithout' regard t~) tl~eir racel cOi;~i reii~ion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination' rates of pay or other foTM of compensation; and selection for trainingI including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT shall post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided by the Government setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. The CONSULTANT shall state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to r~," coi°~, r6'l~gion, sex, or national origin. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraPh in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. - 1222- City of Mound Mound Visions A LIAR April 21, 2004 Page 8 J. DATA PRACTICES ACT COMPLIANCE This contract is governed by Minnesota Statutes, § 13.05, subds. 6 and 11, the provisions of which are incorporated bY reference into this contract. City agrees to give CONSULTANT access to data collected or maintained by the City as necessary to perform CONSULTANT'S obligations under this cOntract. CONSULTANT agrees to maintain all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained or diS~'e~ated b? CONSULTANT e°nsistent with the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data practices Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 13.02 et seq. (the "Act"). CONSULTANT will not release or disclose the contents of data classified as not public to any person except at the written direction of the City. CON-S~ ,TANT agrees to defend and indemnify the City from any claim, liability, damage or loss asserted against City as a result of CONSULTANT'S failure to comply with the requirements of this para, apb; prOVided that CONSULT~ shall have no duty to defend or indemnify Where the CONSULTANT has acted ~n conformance' with the City's written directions, K. TERM, TERMINATION, sUCCESSoRS AND/OR ASSIGNS The Term of this Agreement shall be concurrent with the work author~ed and shall be in accordance with the schedule to be established between the CITY and the CONSULTANT. If CITY, without Cause, fails to make payment~ to CONSULTANT as required bY this Agreement, coNSULTANT may t~inate th{s Agreement bY wri~en n6~e'e to CITY at its ad~ess by'Cedffied mail at:least ten (10) days pfi0~~ to the date oftermimion. CITY may terminate this Agreement upon not less than ten (105 dilys' written notice to CONSULTANT for the CITY's convenience and with or without cause. 3. Neither the CITY nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet ot tranSier its interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 4. The time schedule shall nOt applY and/or time' extensions will be allowed fOr any circumstanCeS b~ond the control of'the CONSULTs. 5. This Agreemetit shall be g0vemed by the laWs of the State of Minnesota, withoUt regard to choice 6f iaw prOviSionS. 6. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to fees earned thro~tgh ~e effective date of termination. L. REVOCATION If this agreeme//f is not signed and accepted by both Parties within 90 days of the contract date, it shall becoine null and void. - 1223- M. AUTHORIZATION Ci~3~ of Mound Mound Visions A LIAR April 21, 2004 Page9 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, The CITY OF MOUND and the CONSULTANT have made and executed this Agreement for Professional Services, This day of ,2004. CITY OF MOUND Name Title Attest: C Name Title HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. R. Mark.Koegler, President Brace Chamberlain, Vice President M: IMOUND~O4-2 4L4 UAR ~prime contract. DOC - 1224- ATTACHMENT A Ci t~ of Mound Mound Visions A LIAR Ap~121, 2004 Pag~ lO HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 2004 HOURLY RATES Senior Principal .................................................... $130-140/hr Principal ............................................................... $100-120/hr Senior Professional ............................................. $120-135/hr Professional HI ....................................................... $80-110/hr Professional II .......................................................... $65-80/hr Professional I .......................................................... $50-65/hr Technical .................................................................. $35-55/hr Secretarial ..................................................................... $55/kr Testimony ................................................................... $175/hr Construction Administration ......................................... $95/hr Incidental Expenses: Mileage .................................................................. 37.5C/mile Photocopying .......................................................... :. 15 C/page Outside Printing .................................................... Actual Cost Diazo Printing ....................................................... Actuai.Cost Draft Plots ................................................... ".'.,'".2:$~i:(J'0' each~ Vellum Plots ........................................................ $10.00 each Color Plots ........................................................... $20.00 each - 1225- - 1226- n, <[ "'0 § 113- 1:3 - 1227- Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410. Page 1 of 5 C 4410. 3610 ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW PROCESS. Subpart 1. Applicability. A local unit of government may use the procedures of this part instead of the procedures of parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 and 4410.2100 to 4410.3000 to review anticipated residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development and associated infrastructure in a particular geographic area within its jurisdiction, if the local unit has adopted a comprehensive plan that includes at least the elements in items A to C. For purposes of this part, "light industrial development, facility, or project" includes a development, facility, or project engaged in the assembly of products from components that are not produced at the site, but does not include any development, facility, or project, including an assembly development, facility, or project, meeting the requirements for a mandatory EAW in part 4410.4300, subparts 2 to 13, 15 to I8, or 24, or a mandatory EIS in part 4410,4400, subparts 2 to t0, 12, 13, or 25. The local unit of government is the RGU for any review conducted under this part. A. A land use plan designating the existing and proposed location, intensity, and extent of use of land and water for residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and other public and private purposes. B. A public facilities plan describing the character, location, timing, sequence, function, use, and capacity of existing and future public facilities of the local governmental unit. The public facilities plan must include at least the following parts: (1) a transportation plan describing, designating, and scheduling the location, extent, function, and capacity of existing and proposed local public and private transportation facilities and services; and (2) a sewage collection system policy plan describing, designating, and scheduling the areas to be served by the public system, the existing and planned capacities of the public system, and the standards and conditions under which the installation of private sewage treatment systems will be permitted. C. An implementation program describing public programs, fiscal devices, and other actions to be undertaken to implement the comprehensive plan. The implementation plan must include a description of official controls addressing the matters of zoning, subdivision, and private sewage treatment systems, a schedule for the implementation of those controls, and a capital improvements program for public facilities. A local governmental unit that has an adopted comprehensive plan that lacks any of the elements required by this subpart may qualify for the use of the procedures of this part upon a demonstration to the EQB chair that the lacking element would have no substantial effect on the purpose of or outcome of the environmental review and upon receiving authorization from the EQB chair to use these procedures. Subp. 2. Relationship to specific development projects. Upon completion of review under this part, residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/getrt £ 1228-1 4/23/2004 Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410. Page 2 of 5 projects and associated infrastructure within the boundaries established under subpart 3 that are consistent with development assumptions established under subpart 3 are exempt from review under parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 and 4410.2100 to 4410.3000 as long as the approval and construction of the project complies with the conditions of the plan for mitigation developed under subpart 5. If a specific residential, commercial, warehousing, light industrial, or associated infrastructure project, that is subject to an EAW or EIS, is proposed within the boundaries of an area for which an alternative review under this part is planned but has not yet been completed, the RGU may, at its discretion, review the specific project either through the alternative areawide review procedures or through the EAW or EIS procedures. If the project is reviewed through the alternative areawide review procedures, at least one set of development assumptions used in the process must be consistent with the proposed proj"ect, and the project must incorporate the applicable mitigation measures developed through the process. The prohibitions of part 4410.3100, subparts 1 to 3, apply to all projects for which review under this part substitutes for review under parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 or 4410.2100 to 4410.3000. These prohibitions terminate upon the adoption by the RGU of the environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation under subpart 5. Subp. 3. Order for review; geographic area designation and specification of development. The RGU shall adopt an order for each review under this part that specifies the boundaries of the geographic area within which the review will apply and specifies the anticipated nature, location, and intensity of residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development and associated infrastructure within those boundaries. The RGU may specify more than one scenario of anticipated development provided that at least one scenario is consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan. At least one scenario must be consistent with any known development plans of property owners within the area. The RGU may delineate subareas within the area, as appropriate to facilitate planning and review of future development, and allocate the overall anticipated development among the subareas. Subp. 4. Environmental analysis document; form and content. The content and format must be similar to that of the EAW, but must provide for a level of analysis comparable to that of an EIS for impacts typical of urban residential, commercial, warehousing, and light industrial development and associated infrastructure. The content and format must provide for a certification by the RGU that the comprehensive plan requirements of subpart 1 are met. Subp. 5. Procedures for review. The procedures in items A to H must be used for review under this part. A. The RGU shall prepare a draft environmental analysis document addressing each of the development scenarios selected under subpart 2 using the standard content and format provided by the EQB under subpart 4. The draft document must be distributed and noticed in accordance with part 4410.1500. B. Reviewers shall have 30 days from the date of notice of availability of the draft environmental analysis in http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/getrr- 1229-1 4/23/2004 Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410. Il& ,ii I Page 3 of 5 C the EQB Monitor to submit written comments to the RGU. Reviewers that are governmental units shall be granted a 15-day extension by the RGU upon a written request for good cause. A copy of the request must be sent to the EQB. Comments must address the accuracy and completeness of the information provided in the draft analysis, potential impacts that warrant further analysis, further information that may be required in order to secure permits for specific projects in the future, and mitigation measures or procedures necessary to prevent significant environmental impacts within the area when actual development occurs. Governmental units shall also state in their comments whether or not they wish to be notified by the RGU upon receipt of applications for specific development projects within the area. C. The RGU shall revise the environmental analysis document based on comments received during the comment period. The RGU shall include in the document a section specifically responding to each timely, substantive comment received that indicates in what way the comment has been addressed. If the RGU believes a request for additional analysis is unreasonable, it may consult with the EQB chair before responding to the comment. The RGU shall include in the document a plan for mitigation specifying the mitigation measures that will be imposed upon future development within the area in order to avoid or mitigate potential environmental impacts. The plan shall contain a description of how each mitigation measure will be implemented, including a description of the involvement of other agencies, if appropriate. D. The RGU shall distribute the revised environmental analysis document in the same manner as the draft document and also to any persons who commented on the draft document and to the EQB staff. State agencies and the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities have ten days from the date of receipt of the revised document to file an objection to the document with the RGU. A copy of any letter of objection must be filed with the EQB staff. An objection may be filed only if the agency filing the objection has evidence that the revised document contains inaccurate or incomplete information relevant to the identification and mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts or that the proposed plan for mitigation will be inadequate to prevent potentially significant environmental impacts from occurring. E. Unless an objection is filed in accordance with item D, the RGU shall adopt the revised environmental analysis document and the plan for mitigation at its first regularly scheduled meeting held 15 or more days after the distribution of the revised document. The RGU shall submit evidence of the adoption of the document and plan for mitigation to the EQB staff and all agencies that have stated that they wish to be informed of any future projects within the area as part of their comments on the draft environmental analysis document. The EQB shall publish a notice of the adoption of the documents and the completion of the review process in the EQB Monitor. Upon adoption of the environmental analysis document and the plan for mitigation, residential, commercial, warehousing, http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/getn- 1230-1 4/23/2004 Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410. Page 4 of 5 and light industrial projects and associated infrastructure within the area that are consistent with the assumptions of the document and that comply with the plan for mitigation are exempt from review under parts 4410.1100 to 4410.1700 and 4410.2100 to 4410.2800. F. If an objection is filed with the RGU in accordance with item D, within five days of receipt of the objection the RGU shall consult with the objecting agency about the issues raised in the objection and shall advise the EQB staff of its proposed response to the objection. At the request of the RGU, the objecting agency, the EQB staff, and any other affected agency shall meet with the RGU as soon as practicable to attempt to resolve the issues raised in the objection. Within 30 days after receipt of the objection the RGU shall submit a written response to the objecting agency and the EQB chair. The response shall address each of the issues raised in the objection. The RGU may address an issue by either revising the environmental analysis document or plan for mitigation, or by explaining why it believes that the issue is. not relevant to the identification and mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts. G. Within five days of receipt of the RGU's response to the objection, the objecting agency shall advise the EQB chair of whether it accepts the response and withdraws its objection or continues to object. If the objecting agency continues to object, the EQB chair shall place the matter on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled EQB meeting or of a special meeting. H. If the matter is referred to the EQB under item G, the EQB shall determine whether the environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation are adequate, conditionally adequate, or inadequate. If the EQB finds the documents conditionally adequate or inadequate, the EQB shall specify the revisions necessary for adequacy. The EQB shall only find the documents inadequate if it determines that they contain inaccurate or incomplete information necessary to the identification and mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts or that the proposed plan for mitigation will be inadequate to prevent the occurrence of potentially significant environmental impacts. If the EQB finds the documents adequate or conditionally adequate, the RGU shall adopt the documents under item E. If the documents were found conditionally adequate by the EQB, the RGU shall first revise the documents as directed by the EQB. If the EQB finds the documents inadequate, the RGU has 30 days to revise the documents and circulate them for review in accordance with items D to H. Subp. 6. Time limit. Unless an objection is filed under subpart 5, item D, the RGU shall adopt the environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation no later than at its first meeting held more than 120 days after the date on which the RGU ordered review under this part. The time limit may be extended upon the agreement of all proposers whose project schedules are affected by the review. Subp. 7. Updating the review. To remain valid as a substitute form of review, the environmental analysis document and the plan for mitigation must be revised if any of the http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/getrc- 1231 -1 4/23/2004 C &, Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410. circumstances in items A to H apply. A. Five years have passed since the RGU adopted the original environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation or the latest revision. This item does not apply if all development within the area has been given final approval by the RGU. B. A comprehensive plan amendment is proposed that would allow an increase in development over the levels assumed in the environmental analysis document. C. Total development within the area would exceed the maximum levels assumed in the environmental analysis document. D. Development within any subarea delineated in the environmental analysis document would exceed the maximum levels assumed for that subarea in the document. E. A substantial change is proposed in public facilities intended to service development in the area that may result in increased adverse impacts on the environment. F. Development or construction of public facilities will occur on a schedule other than that assumed in the environmental analysis document or plan for mitigation so as to substantially increase the likelihood or magnitude of potential adverse environmental impacts or to substantially postpone the implementation of identified mitigation measures. G. New information demonstrates that important assumptions or background conditions used in the analysis presented in the environmental analysis document are substantially in error and that environmental impacts have consequently been substantially underestimated. H. The RGU determines that other substantial changes have occurred that may affect the potential for, or magnitude of, adverse environmental impacts. The environmental analysis document and plan for mitigation must be revised by preparing, distributing, and reviewing revised documents in accordance with subpart 5, items D to H, except that the documents must be dis%ributed to all persons on the EAW distribution list under part 4410.1500. Persons not entitled to object to the documents under subpart 5, item D, may submit comments to the RGU suggesting changes in the documents. Subp. 8. Report to EQB. The EQB chair may ask the RGU to report on the status of actual development within the area, and on the status of implementation of the plan for mitigation. Upon request, the RGU shall report to the EQB chair within 30 days. STAT AUTH: MS s 116D.04; t16D.045 HIST: 13 SR 1437; 21 SR 1458 Current as of 02/13/04 II Page 5 of 5 http://www.revisor, leg.state.mn.us/cgi.bin/getn, 1232-1 4/23/2004 CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA PRE-SALE REPORT APRIL 27, 2004 Proposed Issues: 1. $1,785,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 2. $1,670,000 General Obligation Utility Bonds 3. $540,000 Equipment Certificates Purpose: 1. Financing for public improvements assessed to 2004 Street Reconstruction ($980,000), a portion of construction costs for CSAH 15 ($500,000) and a portion of the 2004 retaining wall reconstruction costs ($200,000). 2. Financing for the utility portion of 2004 Street Reconstruction ($270,000 Water Fund, $20,000 Sewer Fund and $120,000 Storm Sewer Fund), CSAH15 ($310,000 from Water Fund and $450,000 from Storm Sewer Fund), Water Projects (Well #8 - $300,000 and telemetry $25,000), and Sewer Projects ($25,000 for telemetry and $100,000 for slip-lining for the sanitary sewer included in street project. 3. Financing for the 2004 Equipment Replacement ($540,000). Description: These three debt issues will provide financing for projects approved by the City Council. The Improvement and Utility Bonds combine to provide funding for primarily four projects; the City portion of the CSAH construction costs, the 2004 Street Improvement Project. the Well #8 and the 2004 retaining wall replacement. The attached table provides financing details. The Improvement Bonds will be repaid from assessments ($1,140,000) and debt levy ($540,000). The Utility Bonds will be repaid from revenues collected by the City. Term/Call Feature: The Improvement Bonds will have a term of 15 years and will be callable in 2010 for bonds maturing on February 1,2011 and thereafter.. The Utility Bonds (Water, Sewer and Storm Sewer Bonds will have a term of 20 years and will be callable in 2014 for bonds maturing on February 1, 2015 and thereafter. The Equipment Certificates will have a term of 5 years. Funding Sources: The Improvement Bonds will be funded by .the assessments and general debt levy. The Water, Sewer and Storm Sewer bonds will be paid from user fees. Discussion Issues: Schedule: Pre-Sale Review: Distribute Official Statement: April 27, 2004 May 10, 2004 - 1233- C Conference with Rating Agency: Bond Sale: Estimated Closing Date: Week of May 15, 2004 May 25, 2004 June 18, 2004 Attachments: Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Bond Buyer Index Resolution authorizing Ehlers to proceed with bond sale Ehlers Contacts: Financial Advisors: Bond Analysts: Jim Prosser, Sid Inman, Diana Lockard (651) 697-8534 Debbie Holmes (651) 697-8536 Connie Kuck (651) 697-8527 Bond Sale Coordinator: The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the Council Members at their home address for review prior to the sale date. Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - 1234- Z O0 O0 O0 0 0 CD 0 CD ~0000 ~0000 ~0000 - 1235- C C C ooooooooooooooo ~oooooooo ooo o~ ooooooooooooooo °8888°°8888°°888oo oo ~ooo o~oo~ ~ ~ ~ ~~oo0 o - 1236- City of Mound 2004 GO Equipment Certificates Levy 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Collect Pay 8/1/2004 2/1/2005 2005 8/1/2005 2/1/2006 2006 8/1/2006 2/1/2007 2007 8/1/2007 2/1/2008 2008 8/1/2008 2/1/2009 2009 8/1/2009 2/1/2010 Principal 95,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 105,000.00 105,000.00 Interest P&I 8,771.67 8,771.67 6,578.75 6,578.75 1.95% 6,578.75 101,578.75 5,652.50 5,652.50 2.25% 5,652.50 105,652.50 4,527.50 4,527.50 2.65% 4,527.50 104,527.50 3,202.50 3,202.50 2.95% 3,202.50 108,202.50 1,653.75 1,653.75 3.15% 1,653.75 106,653.75 x105% 122,775.63 116,870.25 114,507.75 116,975.25 113,722.88 Total $505,000.00 $52,001.67 $557,001.67 - 1237- City of Mound, MN B L G 70,O00 G. O. £e venue Bonds Dated June I~ 3004 Issue Summary Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 06/01/2004 [ Delivered 06/01/2004 Water Sewer Storm Sources Of Funds Far Amount of Bonds ........................................................ $935,000.00 Total Sources ................................................................. $935,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.250%) ......................... 11,687.50 Costs of Issuance ................................................................ 15,676.65 Deposit to Project Construction Fund ............................. 905,000.00 Rounding Amount ............................................................. 2,635.85 Total Uses ...................................................................... $955,000.00 $150,000.00 $I 50,000.00 1,875.00 2,514.97 145,000.00 610.03 $150,000.00 $585,000.00 $585,000.00 7,312.50 9,808.38 570,000.00 (2,120.88) $585,000.00 Issue Summary $1,670,000.00 $1,670,000.00 20,875.00 28,000.00 1,620,000.00 1,125.00 $!,670,000.00 C $erO4 $1~g7OK Go WtrRev / lssuv $ummary / 4/.21/2004 [ 1.2:41PM Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Leaders in Public Finance since 1955 - 1 238- Page 1 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-__ RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF $1,785,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2004A $1,670,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY BONDS, SERIES 2004B $540,000 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004C WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,785,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2004A (the "Series 2004A Bonds"), to finance public improvements assessed to 2004 Street Reconstruction ($980,000), a portion of construction costs for CSAH 15 ($500,000) and a portion of the 2004 retaining wall reconstruction costs ($200,000); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,670,000 General Obligation Utility Bonds, Series 2004B (the "Series 2004B Bonds"), to finance the utility portion of 2004 Street Reconstruction ($270,000 Water Fund, $20,000 Sewer Fund and $120,000 Storm Sewer Fund), CSAH 15 ($310,000 from Water Fund and $450,000 from Storm Sewer Fund), Water Projects (Well #8 - $300,000 and telemetry $25,000), and Sewer Projects ($25,000 for telemetry and $100,000 for slip-lining for the sanitary sewer included in street project); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $540,000 Equipment Certificate, Series 2004C (the "Series 2004C Bonds"), to finance the 2004 Equipment Replacement ($540,000); and WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent financial advisor for the Series 2004A Bonds, Series 2004B Bonds and the Series 2004C Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota as follows: Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Series 2004A Bonds, Series 2004B Bonds and the Series 2004C Bonds. 1 - 1239- F{e$olution No, 04-__ 2. Meetinq; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:30 p.m. on May 25, 2004 for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Series 2004A Bonds, Series 2004B Bonds and the Series 2004C Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion Adopted by the City Council this __ day of ,2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 - 1240- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Honorable Mayor and City Council Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works / Engineering Coordinator April 21,2004 County Road #15 / # 110 special assessments for streets, streetscape, and lighting, requesting Council order feasibility report and set the public hearing. Background When the County Road # 15 / # 110 project was developed several years ago it was contemplated that special assessments would be used to help finance the project. Although no specific assessment amounts were contemplated at that time, HKGi, the City's planning consultant prepared a preliminary concept on how special assessments might be applied to the various aspects of the project. Staff has refined this concept and attached is the proposed concept for the Council's review. The proposed assessments include 100% of the cost for curb & gutter, and 70% of the cost for street lighting and streetscape elements. The public hearing for this project is necessary prior to setting the assessment hearing. In addition, it is also required that the Council hold the public hearing prior to selling bonds to finance the City's share of the construction costs. Staff anticipates that the County, in accordance with the cooperative construction agreement, will bill the City for 95% of it's share of the costs within the next couple of months and we will need the proceeds from the bond sale at that time. The Council can hold the assessment hearing at a later date this year and modify the proposed assessments at the assessment hearing if it so chooses. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council accept this report, order a feasibility report for the County Road # 15/# 110 project, and set a public hearing for May 25, 2004. - 1241 - - 1242- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND REALIGNMENT OF CSAH 15/110 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve CSAH 15 (Shoreline Drive) on new alignment from 566 feet west of CSAH 15 (Commerce Boulevard) to Cypress Lane as well as adjoining portions of CSAH 110, city streets and driveways, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to McCombs Frank Roos Associates for study and that they be instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of April, 2004. Attest: BOnnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel C - 1243- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-__ RESOLUTION CALLING HEARING ON CONSTRUCTION AND REALIGNMENT OF CSAH 15/110 WHEREAS, the City Council ordered the preparation of a report for the said improvement on April 27, 2004; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 25th day of May, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall, and the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of April, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1244- Memo To: From: GG: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Matt Simoneau, Building Official 4/12/20O4 2647 Westedge Boulevard Pursuant to City Code Section 300.10 Subdivision 5 all exterior work related to a building permit is required to be completed within one year from the date of permit issuance. The code section also gives the City Council authority to grant extensions after establishing reasonable satisfaction that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee prevented completion of the work for which the permit was granted. The attached letter is a request from Paul Morales for an extension until August 31, 2004 on his permit which was issued on May 6, 2003. E~ - 1245- Paul Morales Phone (952) 471-7151 Fax 555-9876 Cell (612) 636-9220 2647 Westedge Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 April 06, 2004 Mound City Council 5341 Maywood Kd. Mound, MN 55364 To whom it may concern,, I would like to apply for an extension of the comp, lotion date on my building permit. I was issued the permit on May 6, 2003 to install new windows, siding, soffits, and facia. I'm doing the work myself; and although I've made great progress, the project will not be completed by May 6, 2004 as I had expected. ARer tearing off the old siding I found that the framing in many areas of the house was water damaged due to improper flaming when the house was built, which took me a lot of time to repair. In addition I've had to deal with re-establi~ing the grade to get proper run-off I had some grade work done and put in a boulder wall hst fall I held off seeding a new hwn to see how tbe new grade affected the run-offffom the melting snow. I t didn't work out. Ihad always known that the elevation of the driveway was higher than that of the garage floor. Now it appears i'm going to have to install draintile or have the driveway rephced at the correct elevation. I would like to plant a new hwn this spring but would need to take care of my grade/driveway issues first. I also plan on building a screened porch to replace the rotted deck I tore off The porch roof will tie into the house roof line, therefore I need to fintme the porch and build the porch roof prior to completing the soff~ on the house. In light of the obstacles Fve come across and the additional work to be done that affects the work described under the current building permit, I would ask that Council grant me an extension until August 31, 2004. I'm confident that I can complete the work in a timely manner, especially now that I can't imagine anymore surprises with the flaming of the home orthe grounds. I appreciate your positive consideration in this matter. - 1246- Page 1 of 4 Kandis Hanson From: To: Sent: Subject: "Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us> ' "Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us>; <taggart52001@yahoo.com> Wednesday, April 21, 2004 3:18 PM WHCC 4/28/04 Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative **Wednesday, April 28, 2004** 12:00-1:30 PM Gillespie Center 2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound Any comments or questions, contact Leah Weycker, Collaborative Coordinator, at 952-491-8058 or ~y_~k~rL.~v~e.s.to ~ .a,!~.!..._2...:~.,.¢~ 1. Lunch 12:00 Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a light "free will donation" lunch, suggested value $6.00. 2. Introductions 3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes 4. Announcements 5. Up date on Community Statement 6. Jim Skyrms, West Metro Faith Communities in Action Jim will talk about the Minnesota Children's Health Security Act, how the budget cuts effect childcare support, and how we can affect public policy. "Too often we underestimate the power of a touch, a smile, a kind word, a listening ear, an honest compliment, or the smallest act of caring; all of which have the potential to turn life around. People come into our lives for a reason, a season, or a lifetime. Take no one for granted and embrace all equally with joy!" -Connie J. Blasing, U of M C *Advisory Group Updates Health - Depression and Suicide Awareness Task Force Sandy Olstad, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke Camp TOAD students are planning a poster awareness campaign for depression and suicide. We need adult helpers for this group! - 1 247- 4/22/2004 Page 2 of 4 We CAN has hired a new family advocate that will also serve as the health advocate. We are anxious to get that program up and running. We will continue to try and connect with the clinic and hospital. Youth Activities - Skate Park Task Force Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Kathy Jones, Kim Erickson Heiar The youth drop in at Grandview middle school and the after school activity bus has ended for the school year. Both will be evaluated. There is one small area of the bowl to pour on the skate park. Leah is working on clarifying the final details of the cement contract and hopefully the bowl will be done so the volunteers can get in to finish the park. Kids are so anxious!!! We still are in desperate need of money and cement workers. HELP! Parent Education Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Bill Erickson, Amy Taggart The parent education group, along with the joint parent advisory group sponsored Corwin Kroenberg for an encore performance last Monday. A small but lucky crowd heard a great, funny and informative presentation about raising responsible children. The parent education group is designing a flier with information related to parenting that may be mailed out to families in the Westonka area. Community Margaret Holste, Carol Olson, Ginny Lozano, Jeanette Metz, Dena Kuenzel The Housing and Home Improvement Fair is going to take place on May 4th, 2004 at the Gillespie Center. The Fair will have about 18 vendors with great information. Please come! Executive / Finance Kim Heiar, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer, Mary Hughes The Executive group met to discuss a government data practices act request and decided how to do a job review for Leah. Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County No new Alliance information. ** Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Minutes - March 24, 2004** Present: Johanna Eckman, Denise Eng, Bill Erickson, Mike Rice for Kim Erickson-Heiar, Mary Hughes, Kathy Jones, Ginny Lozano, Laura Lundberg, Jim Kurtz, Delwayne Haen, Sandy Olstad, Sandy Rauschendorfer, Gwenn Spence, Amy Taggart, Patsy Kiesow, Jennifer Wigton, Gene Zulk, Leah Weycker. And guests: Jenny Brown- parent, Elaine Lyman- Hennepin County, Rich Nicoli - Shirley Hills Primary School - 1 248- 4/22/2004 Page 3 of 4 Amy Taggart made a motion to approve the minutes, seconded by Kathy Jones. Motion passed. Announcements: The senior class asked for a donation to the overnight class party. Leah invited all to the Wild West Round Up coordinated by Rotary for student scholarships. Sandy Olstad announced an active parenting class being offered. Patsy Kisow announced that the Chamber is taking nominations for scholarships for employees of a Chamber member. Bill Erickson announced the ever popular book sale. Project Presentations: Ginny Lozano spoke about the Health Advocate that is just beginning. The family advocate will have this responsibility added to the current position. The health advocate will help families with health related issues identified through a screening process. There are no outcomes yet because the project is just beginning. There was a similar project that we funded years ago to help low income families secure health insurance. The forms required for that process have been simplified so this is now part of the general process at intake. Leah read part of a letter received from Laurie Bonier, teacher at Grandview Middle school. She is requesting funds to take the Excel middle school children to team building exercizes at Camp Ihduhapi. Last year, the benefit of team building in the beginning of the year really helped the students work together and feel more connected to school. Amy Taggart, the WHCC's parent advocate, discussed the web site which started in March. Westonka.org received over 4000 hits. Promotion for the family resource web site was done with balloons at the Minnetrista Safety days, Kids Core carnival, Music in the Parks and several school functions. Amy Taggart also covered her position as the parent advocate. She distributes information and meets with parents in several different venues. She coordinates the parent meetings for the WHCC and is looking for more parents to participate, especially parents of older children. Amy also attends the WHCC meeting and the Youth Activities and Parent Education advisory groups. Leah talked about NYPUM -National Youth Program Using Minibikes. We have sent kids to this YMCA program for the last 4 years. Each year 5 new kids attend and a group of 5 of the older students have participated in a second year program. The participants are selected by school counselors for many different reasons like poor academics, friendship issues, attendance issues and others. The student, parent, and counselor develop goals and sign a contract to work on those goals over the 10 week summer project. The staff funding was removed because Leah will be the adult taking the students. - 124g- 4/22/2004 Page 4 of 4 Leah covered the after school activity bus. This is one of the first projects that the WHCC funded. We collected $514.00 in fees with 628 Grandview students and 212 high school students riding the bus. Many of the kids use free passes that are given by the teachers or the drop in center. We are working on making the time better for more riders. We will start later in the fall and end around April 15, as we are doing this year. This, and presentations fromt eh last several WHCC meetings, covered all 'the projects requesting funds from the budget this year. Community Statement: We didn't get very many surveys back with negative comments or suggestions for change. What is the next step? Remember that it is about parenting kids with educations of the parents and other adults in the community. We decided to put the rough draft in the Laker and then rewrite the statement and have a community meeting. It would be a benefit for groups to endorse the statement when it is in the next draft. Budget: Leah explained that the incoming dollars we have in the budget are an estimate and we have not included any of the carry over funds from this fiscal year, which doesn't end until June 30th. Consider the budget a working plan. Any other spending requests, not included in the budget today, will need to come back to this group for approval. Gene Zulk and Rich Nicoli told the group about Title One funding being totally cut in our school district. Gene thanked the WHCC for all the support we have given the schools in the past and would like to ask for our help in filling the gaps for students that will suffer from the loss of Title One funding. Leah went over each advisory groups budget and the over all budget numbers. Some changes were made on the formulas on the overall budget page. XXXX made a motion to approve the budget in the amount of $167,706.00, Amy Taggart seconded the motion. Motion passed. All the advisory groups were thanked for doing such a good job of cutting the budget. Meeting adjourned. - 1250- 4/22/2004 C DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES ~April 15, 2004 Present: Commissioners Jim Funk, Greg Enrich, Gerald Jones, Michelle Olson, Frank Ahrens, Council Representative Mark Hanus, Park SuPerintendent Jim Fackler, Dock Administrator Katie Hoff, Secretary Denice Widmer Citizens Present: Mike Gardner 1599 Bluebird Lane Chair Funk called the meeting to order at 7:32pm 1. Approval of March 18~ 2004 Minutes MOTION by Funk to approve the March 18, 2004 Minutes. SECOND by Enrich. Motion Carried. 2. Agenda Changes: None 3. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens ent. None Discuss: Street Vacation Request -Woo, Applicants: Mike Gardner and Ted 1599 Bluebird Lane and 160 ..bird Lane Fackler gave a brief background on the request, vacation request subject to the five conditions listed. Mike Gardner follow wording states," does feels it she exception, etc." Fac ports the ussion with applicant landscaping and parking. Ahrens asked for paragraph of the Recommendation where it lccess to the lake with the exception, etc." Ahrens provide public access to the lake with the regarding this. MOTION by Funk to conditions outlined in the Carried. the Street Vacation Request subject to the SECOND by Enrich. Motion Discuss: 2004 Rip Rapping Project Following discussion on the Waterbank and Idlewood sites, the DCAC decided to tour the two areas before making a recommendation. Discuss: Fund Balance a. Waiting list non-refundable fee for the 2005 season. Fackler gave brief overview of this request stating that it would cover staff costs and cut down on staff time. Hanus recommended that the DCAC present this to the Council no later than October in order to be in effect for the 2005 season. Fund balance discussion opened with Funk handing out a draft proposal that included, among other items, a 10% increase in fees every three years. The projections show a $100,00.00 Fund balance in the year 2008. Discussion - 1251 - followed. Ahrens asked Fackler to provide the final 2003 budget figures so he can compare them to the 2004 approved budget figures. Ahrens also stated that he would like to look at the Administrative costs more closely. Hanus stated that the Mayor and Council are looking at trends. Eurich stated that the trend would stay the same, but the figures may vary. Hanus stated that the Council would be more in favor of the revised draft, but advised the DCAC to be very comfortable with the Fund Balance before sending it to the Council. Hanus also recommended including the non-refundable fees as a revenue line item. DCAC agreed upon a $20 non-refundable fee. Fund Balance discussion will continue at the May meeting. Review: Shoreline Inventory Map/BSU Count Fackler stated that this was more of an FYI for te DCAC. Discussion followed on how to stay within the license of 590, and ~n the DCAC felt they wanted to apply to the LMCD for an application a change that could open up the entire program for review. Discussion the May meeting. Discuss: May Agenda Calendar Fund Balance and Tour were added. Tour of ri ~ites will begin at 6:30. 9. Reports: None MOTION by Ahrens to adjourn the meeting. SECOND by Funk. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:15pm. -1252- ~p~ 69 Z004 11:19:16 Via Fax -> 95Z47ZBGZO Odniois~rator Pag~ 881 0£ 08Z C C~ · -FndayFax- Tell legislators TELsfrABOR are bad public policy for Minnesota Many lawmakers will be returning home this Friday for an extended weekend. Now is a great time to connect with your state senators and representatives to remind them of the issues important to your city. It's also an opportunity to ask your elected leaders to oppose Constitutional amendments, including Tax and Expenditure Limitations (TELs) such as the Taxpayers Bill of Rights (TABOR). A wee/dy legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities April 9, 2004 Page 1 lawmakers proved their ability to balance the sixth largest deficit in the nation without measures such as TABOR, and to make the tough decisions for which they are elected. Now is not the time to surrender representative democracy, which provides real opportunities to debate, weigh and balance public policies for the benefit of Minnesota as a whole. The ability of city officials Io deliver mandated and discretionary services will be negatively impacted if proponents of a campaign succeed in amending the state Constitution to place caps on state, and potentially local, spending and revenues. Tax and Expenditure Limits (TELs) would make it more difficult - and sometimes impossible - for states to raise needed revenue, address unexpected crises and to meet shifting or growing public needs. Currently in Colorado, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are introducing many different amendments to address the varied and onerous pressures created by TABOR, which the state adopted during 1992. One proposal would create a "timeout" to suspend TABOR for two years; another, would allow the state to establish a budget reserve; one would address competing Constitutional amendments; and still another would require thc t future constitutional amendments be approved by two-thirds majorities instead of the current simple majority. The Taxpayers League of Minnesota will attempt to reinvigorate its efforts to garner support for TABOR, and will hold a Day at the Capitol on April 15 to promote TABOR. Please take action today to tell your lawmakers that TELs/TABOR are unnecessary. Last year To reinforce your message that TELs/TABOR are bad public policy for Minnesota, please consider adopting a city council resolution opposing TEl_s/TABOR at your next council meeting. (A sample resolution is posted in the Advocacy section of the League's web site at www.imnc.or~). The making of a tax bill On Thursday morning the Senate Tax committee informally released thirteen draft articles for the 2004 omnibus tax bill. Chairman Senator Pogemiller (DFL-Minneapolis) stressed that these were draft articles, there were very likely mistakes in the bill, and that neither staff nor members had had much of a chance to proof the bill. He also indicated that in many instances, language was included in the draft in order to have a placeholder for later discussion of the topic. The goal of the bill is to net zero, meaning if they spend money in one area, the bill would have to find revenue for that expenditure in another area. The bill does not yet have a number, and neither a spreadsheet or official summary were distributed with the draft articles. Items of interest for cities that are included in the bill draft so far: * Local option sales tax bills, requested by individual cities * LGAcut restoration (SF 2873 Langseth) · Aggregate resource preservation property tax law (SF 2958 Hottinger) · Regional investment income tax credit for local economic development (SF 1879 Sams) For more information on city lelgialalive issue',,, conlacl any member of lhe League of Minneaola Cilies Inlet e, overnmenlal Relaliona team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1253- apr 89 2884 11:19:57 Via Fax -> 95247ZOGZ8 Adninis~ra~or Page 882 Of 882 -FridayFax- Reinstates class 4d for low-income rental housing Study of metro fiscal disparities program (SF 2633 Belanger) Business subsidy law changes (SF 2674 I-'Iottinger) Allowing that special service districts may be managed by a non-profit corporation (SF 2304 Pogemiller) Adding former school buildings to definition of structurally substandard for purposes of redevelopment TIF (SF 3008 Rest) Job training T1F (SF 1826 Rest) Local TIF projects, legislative approval, requested by individual cities Expenditure limits on JOBZ State Auditor audits of JOBZ zones and business subsidies agreements Bio-tech/health sciences industry grants A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities April 9, 2004 Page 2 The House has passed several omnibus supplemental budget bills over the last two weeks, including: Rumors still abound that the House may not even have a tax bill; a rumor Capitol insiders hear virtually every year. The Senate is scheduled for a 5 p.m. Monday floor session, the House a 3 p.m. floor session, and committee meetings are not expected for Monday. According to Senate Tax staff, the earliest day for a meeting of the tax committee would be Tuesday. The committee will then begin to fine-tune language in the bill and take any testimony on amendments and the other provisions of the bill. For questions or concerns, please contact Jenn O'Rourke at 651.281.1261 or jorourke@lmnc.org. House and Senate vote on omnibus budget bills HF 2755 (Harder) - Omnibus agriculture bill HF 1793 (Seagren) - Omnibus education bill (includes both K-12 and higher education) HF 1867 (Ozment) - Omnibus environment bill HF 1681 (Bradley) - Omnibus health and human services bill HF 2028 (Smith) - Omnibus judiciary bill HF 3090 (Gunther) - Omnibus jobs and economic development bill HF 2684 (Haas) - Omnibus state government bill HF 3141 (Kuisle) - Omnibus transportation bill In a marathon session that extended into Thursday morning, the Senate passed a single supplemental budget bill, I-IF 2028 (Cohen), and adopted a separate bill, HF 956 (Cohen), containing budget reduction provisions. The House and Senate both solve the 2004-05 budget deficit without raising taxes or tapping the state's rainy day fund. The bills also contain some common revenue raising elements, such as requiring up-front payment of sales taxes on care leases which generates $36 million in new revenue and applying the cigarette sales tax at the wholesale level which will bring an additional $1 l'million into the state's coffers. However, many differences in the bills will need to be ironed out in conference committees over the next six weeks. A more detailed analysis of these bills will be published in next week's Bulletin. This week, the House and Senate spent much of the week on the floor debating various omnibus budget bills to address the $160 million budget deficit projected for the current biennium and provide additional funding for certain projects and progra rna. For more infotmalion on city l,~g/alat/ve issues, conlaat any m~mber of the L,~ague of Minnesota C/ties Intergov,~rnn"~ntal Relat/orta team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1254- CI JAMES E. KURTZ Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Telephone (952) 472-0621 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch (763) 525-6210 Fax (952) 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 April7,2004 City Administrator Bill Weeks Ci~ofSpringPark 4349WarrenAvenue SpfingPark, MN55384 Dear Administrator Wee~p;× Thank you for your invitation to present a contract pyl~x)shl for l~olice service to the'City of Spring Park. I believe the Mound Police DepOnent WOuld bea great partner for you for many reasons, the~'first being our proximit~'i[?')~)urCommuni~ty. The Mound Police Department is headquartered lc'ss than-one-mil6: from:y0ttr"e~ty~d our officers drive through your community many times throughout the day en route to the "Island." Our new Public Safety Facility is a beautiful building that has underground garages, holding cells, digital camera monitoring syaem}:a. Sta~e:of. the~art training room, and on-site animal kennels. The Mound Police De~0nt~iis:ai~l,~Service police agency offering patrol officers, investigators, animal also have a Crime-Free Multi- Housing Program, son?rogram that services many of the children in Spring Park.: In ~ddition~, we offer ATV patrol, and an Emergency Preparedness Director. !nthe. future we will be offering a monthly police cable show and a Code Enforcement Proj.~i~~;:adckess.city nuisance violations. The Mound Police area drug task force. between the Orono and the Hennepin County middle, and street level drug enforcement effortiri helping to develop a lake a cooperative effort :Hermepin Public Safety and is to target upper, and coordinated The Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force is important to the lake area and the City of Mound. Having a good working relationship between the departments, officers, and chiefs is critical to the success of the Task Force. Consequently, I will not be submitting a contract proposal to provide police services. I'm concerned that presenting a proposal - 1255- would compromise our relationship with the Omno Police Department and ultimately affect of our drug enforcement efforts. I want to thank you for offering me the oppommity to present a police proposal for your community. As a city administrator, I know your number one priority is maintaining the trust of the people you serve. I'm proud that you would consider our department worthy of your endeavor. I hope you will consider us in the future. Sincerely, James E. Kurtz Chief of Police C: City Manger Kandis Hanson - 1256- C L~ M~se~osr~ Cn~usr~a o~ Couueac~ 8600 Shoreline Drive. P.O. Box 115- Navarre, Minnesota 55392. Telephone: 952-471-0768. Facsimile: 952-471-0577 www. lakeminnetonkachamber.com April20,2004 Kandis Hanson 'City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Kandis Thank your 2004 ~ We really appreciate ommerce. after careful Jami Burke, as one C We Banquet on C Service We will Business PerSbn of the Year, Lifetime Achievement Award. '~':~ ': ye also encourage you tO incite/~i;i=::S::'~ien~s and B:zia~e~ ~S6c~a~;}o the Aw~ds g~t~so ~ey.e~:~h~,6 iff: her ~lebm~ibfi~:~::~;~gi~Se:RSVP by oa!!i~ Ghmber :~::: ?~ "Working Togetho°' Serving Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Navarre/Orono, St. Bonifacius, Spring Park - 1257- 04-22-2004 06:58AM FROM LAKE MINHETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4920620 P.02 - 1258- FROM LAKE M I NNETONKA COMMUN I CA 4?20620 P. 03 E -1259- TOTRL P.03 CITY OF MOUND BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT MARCH 2004 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE NEW CONSTRUCTION SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED I I 214,299 71 1,457,900 SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED TWO FAMILY / DUPLEX MULTIPLE FAMILY (3 OR MORE UNITS) TRANSIENT HSG. (HOTELS / MOTELS) SUBTOTAL 1 I 214,299 7 1,457,900 ~ION-RESIDENTIAL [~/PERMITS I I VALUATION [~PERMITS VALUATION ~IEW CONSTRUCTION . 3OMMERClAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) :::)FFICE / PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC / SCHOOLS SUBTOTAL 0 - 0 RESIDENTIAL I~ PERMITS I IVALUATION I~ PERMITS I VALUATION ADDITIONS I ALTERATIONS ADDITIONS TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING 2 160,000 DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 1 4,800 DECKS 1 1,950 1 1,950 SWIMMING POOLS REMODEL - MISC. RESIDENTIAL 24 98,181 37 252,861 ~EMODEL - MULTIPLE DWELLINGS SUBTOTAL 25 100,131 41 419,611 ~ION-RESIDENTIAL I~ PERMITS [ IVALUATION I~ PERMITS I VALUATION ~DDITIONS I ALTERATIONS COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC / SCHOOLS DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS SUBTOTAL 0 0 - DEMOLITIONS IF PERMITS I I VALUATION IF PERMITS I VALUATION RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS 3 3 NON-RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS MOVE BUILDING - RESIDENTIAL TOTAL DEMOLITIONS 3 0 31 # UNITS. ~ PERMITS # UNITS VALUATION # PERMITS VALUATION 5t -OYAL I 29]1 111 3t4,430 II 81"11 1,877,511 THIS I YEAR-TO- PERMIT COUNT MONTHDATE BUILDING 51 73 FENCES & RETAINING WALLS 0 0 SIGNS 2 3 PLUMBING 13 41 MECHANICAL 6 25 GRADING 0 1 S & W, STREET EXCAV., FIRE, ETC. 5 13 TOTAL I 77 I 158 - 1260- C C MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 19, 2004 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Michael welcomed the public and called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Jorj Ayaz, Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, David Miller, Michael Mueller, Greg Raines, Jon Schwingler and Dave ©smek. Absent and Unexcused: Greg Raines; Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, and Recording Secretary Jill Norlander. The following individuals were present: Scot Kirk (2163 Fairview La), Cathy and Molly Bailey (1554 Bluebird La), Don Pederson (2400 Interlachen Rd), John & Betty Ann Eccles (5112 Woodland Rd), Mike Gardner (1599 Bluebird La), Marty and Marie Johnson (1582 Bluebird La), Ted Metz (1601 Bluebird La), Connie and Merlin Woytck (1701 Bluebird La), Tom Stokes and Chuck Alcon (Mound Harbor Renaissance). APPROVAL OF MARCH 15 AND APRIL 5~ 2004 MEETING MINUTES Michael requested a change on page 3, paragraph 2 from 13 feet to 10 feet. MOTION by Schwingler, second by Ayaz, to approve the minutes of the March 15, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. Osmek requested a change on page 8, sentence 2 (Council update) to read: "In addition, the tax forfeit land issue was discussed and he clearly stated .... " MOTION by Cklair, second by Mueller, to approve the minutes of the April 5, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE AGENDA WITH ANY AMENDMENTS Agenda was not amended. BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-06 VARIANCE 2163 FAIRVlEW LANE SCOT AND JACQUELINE KIRK Applicant requests a 14-foot front setback variance to allow construction of a new home - 1261 - Planning Commission Minutes April 19, 2004 at the same site as the current home. Property fronts Lake Boulevard on the north side. Lake Boulevard is an unimproved dedicated street that generally serves as the backyard for the subject property. Staff recommends approval of the variance subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. 5. An as-built survey must be submitted including a final computation of hardcover. Discussion Miller asked if the house could be moved back towards the garage. Smith replied that the house has always been in its current location and conformance to the setback would push it out of line with the rest of the neighbors. It would also eliminate the green space between the house and garage. Mueller asked if the homes on either side are 6 feet from their lot lines. Smith indicated they appeared to be but it hasn't been verified. Scot Kirk (applicant) confirmed that the property lines are at an angle. Aesthetically, he feels it's important to keep it in line with everyone else. Osmek was concerned about the sight lines for the neighbor to the west. It was a consensus that keeping the house in the present location would not adversely affect the view. Ayaz thought that the variance made good sense but the case for hardship seems weak. It was also pointed out that the double front, due to Lake Boulevard, is a hardship in itself. Mueller has a difficult time with this one. All the issues brought up are good ones but there is a conforming location for the house. He feels that the setback needs to be more than 6 feet. He would prefer 10 feet. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Ayaz, to recommend Council approve a 10 foot set back from the north property line subject to staff recommendations. MOTION carried. Voting for: Ayaz, Miller, Schwingler, Mueller and Osmek. Voting against: Glister, Michael and Hasse. - 1262- Planning Commission Minutes April 19, 2004 Findings of fact: Fairview Lane is largely unimproved to the north. Lake Boulevard is unimproved and allows for a larger setback to the lake and will never be built on. Impact to the north side is minimized. CASE #04-04 STREET VACATION 1599 AND 1601 BLUEBIRD LANE MIKE GARDNER AND TED METZ The applicants have submitted a vacation request to vacate a portion of Woodland Road adjacent to their properties. As there appears to be no public benefit to retaining this portion of Woodland Road as it is unimproved and does not provide public access to the lake with the exception of the users of the multiple dock and Woodland Point residents. Staff supports the vacation request on the condition that the following list of minimum conditions be included in any recommendation for approval: 1. The applicants shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the vacation request including recording of the vacation resolution. 2. Easements shall be retained for pedestrian users of the multiple docks with all related costs to be paid by the applicants. 3. Any and/or all drainage and/or utility easements shall be retained and/or reserved with all related costs to be paid by the applicants. 4. All private utility easements shall be retained and/or preserved. 5. All obligations under the Woodland Point Settlement Agreement remain in effect and are binding upon all involved parties. Mueller asked if there were any other vacations granted recently where there are utilities in the property being vacated. Smith said she wasn't aware of any. Miller felt it would be difficult to insure unencumbered access over private property. Ayaz inquired if the owner could landscape in such a way that it appears to be private property. Smith said they could. Mueller asked what other vacation we have granted requiring a multitude of easement, walkway and non-landscaping requests like this one. Smith knew of none. Osmek added that, as private property, the owners could make access increasingly difficult. However, it would not happen if the city retains ownership. Public Comments Chuck Champine (1550 Canary Lane) -Went through the settlement. Wants to know why staff has changed their position. Passions ran very high on both sides. - 1263- Planning Commission Minutes April 19, 2004 Recommend the strongest possible language to guarantee the unobstructed travel through the area. Cathy Bailey (1554 Bluebird Lane) - There have been many changes over the years that have contributed to the hindrance of the use by the public. She hopes that the 350 property owners in Woodland Point count for something. Mike Gardner (1599 Bluebird Lane) - He's not trying to stop anyone from accessing the lake. We are trying to change the area from a road to a walkway. Hennepin County encouraged them to pursue the vacation. He wants to get his property into conformance. Mr. Metz wants to put up some trees for some privacy. Gardner was to remove a portion of the house and remodel. The rights are there according to the courts. Michael asked if Gardner didn't think this was a poor time to pursue this just to get your house into conformance. Gardner indicated that the north side isn't conforming either. Mueller said the screening issue for Mr. Metz could be done with a Public Lands permit. Osmek doesn't question his desire to make his property more conforming. He does question the accessibility issue for the area's residents. Mueller reminded the applicant that the property was in this condition when he made the decision to purchase it. Miller indicated that if there weren't another 300+ people to consider it would be a different matter. Michael confirmed with Gardner that, if the city doesn't grant the vacation, he would pursue legal means. Discussion Mueller cited many examples from the settlement agreement that cast doubt on the City's right to administer the dock program because of the lack of a street end on Woodland Road. He also made the point that the LMCD would, in effect, take control of the issues because the City of Mound would no longer have ownership. He also thought it called into question the ownership of all of the streets in the Woodland Point subdivision and the City's responsibility for maintenance. Finally, he state that this vacation cannot be granted because: 1) The City may not technically own the street; 2) It wouldn't be in the public's best interest because of the utility locations; 3) it wouldn't be in the public's best interest because of the difficulty in maintaining unencumbered lake access. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Miller, to recommend Council not vacate this portion of Woodland Road. - 1264- Planning Commission Minutes April 19, 2004 C Ayaz asked if there is a way to turn the streets back over to the City if current ownership is in question. Mueller indicated the owners could, as a whole, decide to turn them back to the City. Gardner was under the impression that, after a certain length of time of maintaining the streets, they become public. Mr. Champine - At one time the area was unincorporated and had county maintaining the roads. Questions may be addressed in the annexation documents. MOTION carried unanimously. PRESENTATION FROM MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE DEVELOPMENT Tom Stokes, Chuck Alcon and downtown. gave a presentation covering the plans for the OLD I NEW BUSINESS Confirmation of 4126 joint City Council Planning Commission Workshop Meeting will be held from 7-9 p.m. Agenda and time limits will be followed closely. City Council Liaison Update Osmek briefly reviewed the Council approval of the Denbigh Road variance. Staff Update Rule M update is dead. GTS Training: please consider taking a class or two. Interim inspections are being done by Paul Waldron & Associates. Searchfor new Building Inspector is commencing a.s.a.p. Road restrictions are off as of Friday, April 16th. Sarah will e-mail the program schedule for the presentation made at the Gillespie Center on 4/17. Railroad abandonment is final and tracks are currently being removed beginning in Hutchinson. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Hasse to adjourn. Seconded and carried by affirmation at 10:10 p.m. -1265- Planning Commission Minutes April 19, 2004 Chair Geoff Michael Attest, Planning Secretary - 1266- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 5, 2004 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Michael welcomed the public and called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, David Miller, Michael Mueller, Jon Schwingler and Dave Osmek. Absent and excused: Greg Raines. Absent and unexcused: Jori Ayaz. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, and Recording Secretary Jill Norlander. The following individuals were present: Allison Fish (4679 Hampton Road) REQUEST TO TABLE MARCH 15~ 2004 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Glister, second by Miller, to table approval of the minutes of the March 15, 2003 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE AGENDA WITH ANY AMENDMENTS MOTION by Mueller, second by Miller, to add an item to the agenda. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF SURVEY FOR 4679 HAMPTON ROAD Mueller asked several questions regarding the accuracy of the submittal. Smith indicated that it is suggested that the corner markers be exposed as well as an outline of the addition established in the field so that Commission members can clearly see what is proposed. MOTION by Mueller, second by Glister, to allow the existing survey for submittal with a future variance request. MOTION carried unanimously. OLD I NEW BUSINESS Rescheduling of ioint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop Discussion established April 26th as the preferred date. C¸] - 1267- Planning Commission Minutes April 5, 2004 City Council Liaison Update Councilman Osmek explained the MCWD Rule M issue. In addition, the tax forfeit land issue was discussed and he clearly stated that there is no law being changed. There are very specific steps that must be followed before parcels are released. Approval at the state level is one step. Staff Update Smith reviewed several items including: resignation of Building Official Matt Simoneau, sale of the trailer park, MCWD Rule M, public hearings for Xcel application and temporary membrane structures, Gardner Bluebird case relating to the Woodland Point settlement agreement, variance request for new home on Fairview Lane, MHRD presentation regarding downtown project, property acquisition for the downtown, various grants relating to the downtown development. Mueller's Added Items True Value is still utilizing the city right-of-way for storage. Smith indicated that the Community Service Officer has been handling the issue and she was told that the property was not right-of-way. The demolition of the single-family home for use as parking for the Gillespie Center may or may not be in conflict with their original Conditional Use Permit conditions. Smith said that the process has just begun and a review of the CUP is forthcoming. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Hasse to adjourn. Seconded and carried by affirmation at 8:24 p.m. Chair Geoff Michael Attest, Planning Secretary - 1268- MEETING MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 2004 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Michael welcomed the public and called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Jorj Ayaz, David Miller, Jon Schwingler and Dave Osmek. Absent and excused: Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, Michael Mueller, and Greg Raines. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Loren Gordon of HKGI. The following individuals were present: Lisa Wallace/Tim Olson and representative. APPROVAL OF MARCH 1~ 2004 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Swingler, second by Miller, to approve the minutes of the March 1, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE AGENDA WITH ANY AMENDMENTS Agenda was not amended. BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE #04-02 VARIANCE 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD- XCEL ENERGY CDD Smith introduced the case indicating it was tabled to address landscaping issues 'including the south side adjacent to the railroad and on the north side along Lynwood Boulevard. Also addressed was the coordination of storm water pond plantings adjacent to the west. A landscape plan has been prepared to address the identified landscaping deficiencies. CDD Smith identified that contact had been made with Xcel Energy prior to the meeting and they indicated their support of the plan. Staff also supports the plan. Smith indicated the control building would be moved to an alternate location on the west side of the site which should provide additional screening of the equipment. Staff views this as a positive to the site plan. - 1269- Planning Commission Minutes March 15, 2004 Andy Beckel from Xcel Energy presented the revised location plan for the control house. The original design was modified to better accommodate maintenance issues in the event there, are failures and equipment needs to be accessed and replaced. Beckel indicated the southwest corner now provides a better opportunity for screening. Beckel talked about the operating frequencies of the substation equipment and its relationships to other typical consumer electronics. He indicated there should be no conflict. MOTION by Osmek, second be Schwingler to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Variances. MOTION carried unanimously. CASE #04-03 VARIANCE 4520 DENBIGH ROAD TIM OLSON I LISA WALLACE Gordon indicated the property was part of minor subdivision in 2001. As a result, the property lost its lot of record status, which limits hardcover to 30 percent. Gordon went over the plans. Plans include a side loaded garage and a deck on the lakeside of the house that runs the full length of the house. The 2001 subdivision created 2 lots from 3. Bluff condition was previously addressed during recent subdivision and therefore does not need to be readdressed. House appears 4-levels but meets the 35 foot height requirements. The garage design is an appropriate way to get vehicles off the road. Some of the houses might have the same setback but usually can't get a car parked without the vehicle hanging out in the street. Denbigh Road is a no parking street. Hardcover calculations do not include the bottom portion of the deck however we are unclear about the surface therefore we assume it is soft. If it's hard it creates more hardcover. We have reviewed the plans with regard to grading. Detailed review will be done at time the building permit comes in. One remaining item included in the minor subdivision included the payment of park dedication fees. The minor subdivision indicated that they would be paid at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, Staff will need to go back and check to make sure they were paid and/or not paid. Staff has no objections to the plan. Comments are included on page 2 of the Planning Report. Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the front and lakeside variance due to the parking issues and width of Denbigh and that the lakeshore variance is deficient only only (7) feet. Hardcover issue should be restricted to the 30 percent requirement. - 1270- C Planning Commission Minutes March 15, 2004 It is suggested that an alternate paver design that provides permeability and reduced driveway width could be reasonable alternatives to minimize hardcover Chair Michael questioned the size of the deck and asked about the typical rule of thumb for deck width being 13 feet. If the 3-car garage was to be reduced to a 2-car only 240 SF would be reduced however a front variance would still be necessary. Miller asked what alternatives could work for driveway. Gordon replied that there are pavers that include specific design with set areas where water can pass through. Often sub grade materials have to include certain types of soils. Ayaz was concerned about the conversion of decks to 3-season porches. Hardcover is a concern. He feels that cutting back the garage from 3 car to 2 car with a front load may be an option. Michael recalled that he went along with the minor subdivision in 2001 as no variances were requested, including setbacks and hardcover. He indicated that the size of the deck concerns him a bit. Tim Olson introduced himself and stated that they have been working on the plans since September. He said he is willing to do the pavers but expressed his desire to do the larger garage because he has 3 vehicles. The garage would provide all season storage. He indicated that minimizing the 3-car to the 2-car reduces the upper floor living space. He also indicated that they would like to have the 13-foot width to accommodate living space. Ten feet gets tight when a table and chairs are set on the deck. The "under deck space" will be soft. Michael indicated that the biggest problem he has is hardcover - new lots created in 2001 stated no variances would be needed. He also has a problem with a 3-car garage. Ayaz also has a problem with the garage size. The deck width is OK but it could be minimized. Osmek doesn't have a problem with the deck as proposed. Under deck is soft, therefore, the deck doesn't create more hardcover. He can go along with the front setback. Michael questioned "comprehensive remodel" vs. "new" -- what is the difference? Gordon talked about the details associated with the project. This plan uses the existing foundations. It is similar to Jones Lane remodel in that pieces of the house are being reused. Tim Olson introduced his designer. He indicated that they are taking the roof off, adding new trusses, with a garage addition on the front side and utilizing existing basement and -1271 - Planning Commission Minutes March 15, 2004 crawlspace. A lot of the existing walls will be kept but updated. Upper floor on top of garage will be used for upper floor living space including a possible mother-in-law suite. Gordon indicated that 8-ft front and 4-ft side setbacks are allowed for detached structures. Ayaz asked if the lakeside wall would remain. The owner confirmed that it would. MOTION by Osmek, second by Ayaz to recommended approval of the deck variance. MOTION carried. Voting for: Schwingler, Osmek and Miller. Voting against: Ayaz and Michael. Osmek said he knows that the applicant wants to make reasonable use of their property, however, this lot cannot accommodate this much house. He indicated that he has no problem denying the hardcover as applicant can use pavers. He is concerned about "overbuilding" the house. He suggested redesigning the garage to be front-loaded which could maybe accommodate 3 cars. Ayaz suggested 2 ~ car garage using side loaded design. Ayaz believes the garage part simply needs to be modified. Areas of the house could be shifted around and could also impact the "appearance" of the size of the house. Smith indicated that meeting dates will still be the same if applicant decides to table until April 5th meeting. It would still accOmmodate an April 13th Council review. Gordon reminded the Commission that the lakeside motion has already been voted on. Michael indicated that he believes that the whole case should come back. Osmek doesn't think it's fair that the vote could be pulled back on the lakeside deck. MOTION by Osmek to reconsider the previous vote. MOTION fails for lack of a second. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Ayaz to deny the hardcover request including findings included in Staff Report. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Ayaz to deny the front setback variance.. MOTION carried unanimously. 6. Temporary Membrane Structures Ordinance: CDD Smith presented the proposed final of the temporary membrane ordinance to the Planning Commission for their formal review. Smith identified some of the provisions that were discussed during the previous review. - 1272- Planning Commission Minutes March 15, 2004 The Commissioners discussed potential issues such as setbacks and hardcover that may limit construction of these structures. Discussion ensued about how to address existing structures which pre-date the adoption of the new regulations. Staff commented that the nonconforming ordinance would address this concern but will also follow up with the City Attorney. Motion by Michael, second by Miller to move the item the item to the City Council. Ayes: Michael, Miller, Ayaz, and Schwingler. Nyes: Osmek. Motion passes 4-1.. OLD/NEW BUSINESS City Code Discussion Issues 100 feet OHW Setback in Pedestrian District CDD Smith identified that the Pedestrian District has a 100 foot setback to the OHWM. All other districts have a 50-foot setback. Smith would like to request the item come back for consideration at a future meeting to bring it in line with other districts. Parking Lot Principal Use by CUP CDD Smith discussed the possibility of allowing principal parking lot use in the residential districts by CUP. Presently, off street parking is listed an accessory use in residential zones and principal parking lot use is not addressed. Smith will research and report back at an upcoming meeting. City Council Liaison Update Osmek indicated 4 of 5 Council members would attend the joint meeting on March 29th and suggested the meeting be kept to 2 hours and the Planning Commission identify items for discussion in advance. He also updated the members on some future water quality issues the City will need to address, provided feedback on the proposed MCWD buffer rules and detailed various downtown items. Staff Update CDD Smith updated the PC on Mound Harbor Renaissance plans to attend a Planning Commission meeting to provide an overview of the project. Smith also identified a number of downtown-related projects Staff is currently working on. MOTION by Miller to adjourn. Seconded and carried by affirmation at 9:35 p.m. - 1273- Planning Commission Minutes March 15, 2004 Chair Geoff Michael Attest, Planning Secretary - 1274- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Direct Date: April 21, 2004 Re: Planning and Building Inspections Dept. Update The following information is provided to update the City Council regarding various issues in the Planning and Building Inspections Department: · Interim building inspections services are being provided by Paul Waldron & Associates who has provided back up services for the past 1-2 years. The MCWD Third Generation Stormwater Plan is currently under review and discussion. Public Works Director attended a meeting at the MCWD on April 21st. It is Staff's understanding that there is an approved purchase agreement for the mobile home park property located on County Road 110 in the Cities of Minnetrista and Mound and a proposed residential project may be forthcoming. · 4/19 PC meeting agenda items: street vacation request for portion of Woodland Road between 1599/1601 Bluebird Lane (Gardner / Metz) - variance request for new house construction at 2163 Fairview Lane (existing structure to be demolished) - presentation from Mound Harbor Renaissance Development (MHRD) regarding downtown project. The acquisition of the Custer property was closed on March 29th. License Agreement allows use of the property by the former owners until Oct. 2004 unless an extension is granted by the City and/or HRA. Members of the Council are reminded that the joint Council/Planning Commission workshop to discuss the proposed project list will be held on April 26th from 7 to 9 PM. Please bring your March 29thagenda packets to the meeting. If needed, additional copies will be provided upon request. - 1275- · A floodplain alteration permit for the property located at 1989 Lakeside Lane will be reviewed by the City Council at its May 11,2004 meeting. · A waiver of platting application for the property located at 5853 Fairfield Road will be reviewed by the City Council at its May 11,2004 meeting. · Staff presented a redevelopment update at the Gillespie Center on Saturday, April 17, 2004. Staff presented a redevelopment update and provided land use training at the Annual Realtor's Day Seminar held on April 21st which was sponsored by Westonka Schools. Officials and Staff from the City of Minnetrista also participated. The event also included a bus tour of both communities. · Page 2 - 1276- C CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com City of Mound MOUND VISIONS UPDATE April 17, 2004 10:30 a.m. Presenters: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Carlton Moore, Public Works Director AGENDA Sarah Sarah Carlton Sarah Sarah Carlton Sarah Carlton Sarah Sarah Sarah Sarah Welcome Introduce self & work history Introduce self & work history . History of Mound redevelopment, Design Guidelines Mound Market Place, Village by the Bay Lost Lake Greenway & Pier Rail/trail CSAH 15 realignment Mound Harbor Renaissance Project, including hotel Skate Park New housing starts Operation Clean Sweep Q&A _printed on recycled paper 1277- CITY OF MOUND' 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com Mound milestones as of March 1, 2004 · Spark of an idea to reinvent downtown Mound- 1989 · Mound Visions downtown revitalization program- initiated 1991 · Mound Visions downtown master plan - adopted 1992 · $1.2 million in federal grants to help realize Mound's downtown vision - 1996 · Historic Lost Lake boat canal- reopened to Lake Minnetonka 2000 · New Main Street ready for future mixed-use neighborhood- constructed 2000 · New downtown post office - opened 2002 · Mound Marketplace commercial district- Christened 2003 · Municipally-owned Harbor Wine & Spirits - opened 2003 · Village by the Bay downtown neighborhood - 2003 - · New Mound public safety'facility -. opened 2004 · Lost Lake'Greenway with trail, marina, pier and central green - complete 2004 County Road 15 roadway and streetscape reconstruction - complete 2005 Mound Harbor Renaissance planned mixed-use redevelopment project- start 2005 Public reinvestment in downtown Mound so far- about $16 million Private investment in downtown Mound so far- about $40 million Future developer investment proposed- about $80 million What does this kind of commitment mean to the value of a community? Examples are doWntown Wayzata, 50th & France and Excelsior & Grand. Minnetrista, Mound, and Westonka: Helping Realtors Gain a Competitive Edge Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 8:15 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. 8:15 8:30 8:45 9:00 10:00 10:10 11:00 11:10 11:30 11:45 12 noon Register and enjoy continental breakfast · Music provided by MadJazz, performed by students in the award-winning music program at Mound Westonka High School, directed by Jane Brambilla Welcome to the Westonka Public Schools! · Gene Zulk, Superintendent, will offer a welcome and an overview of today's program. Reacquaint yourself with Westonka's excellent educational program, and learn why it's one of the top performing districts in the state. Westonka Roundtable Presentations Choose one of the following options: · District Finances, facilitated by business administrator Chuck Herdegen · Kindergarten Options, Expanded Preschool and Childcare Services, facilitated by principals Rich Nicoli and Joe Wacker, and early childhood coordinator Sandy, Wing · Grandview Middle School, facilitated by principal Kevin Borg · Mound Westonka High SchOol, facilitated by principal Keith Randklev · Teacher Qualifications, facilitated by human resources director Mike Looby · Fine Arts, Sports, and other Extracurriculars, facilitated by activities director Bob Kuehl · Q&A, facilitated by Supt. Gene Zulk and teaching and learning director Mark Femrite City Planning 101 · -- · Get the latest on community development and city planning issues in Minnetrista and Mound. Presenters include: Ben Gozola, City Planner, Minnetrista; Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, Mound; Kandis Hanson, City Manager, Mound. Break Buses leave for tour of development highlights in Mound or Minnetrista · If you have a silver star on your nametag, please board the bus for Mound. If you have a green star, please board the bus for Minneu-ista. Buses will board at the front entrance to the Gillespie Center. Q & A with Supt. Zulk Westonka Roundtable Presentations Realtors will choose one of the options listed above. Westonka Roundtable Presentations Realtors will choose one of the options listed above. Know America: How does your knowledge measure up? · Westonka offers the only Know America program of its kind (full community sponsorship, students must earn trip via qualifying tests) in Minnesota. Mound Westonka High School students will share what they learned on last month's remarkable trip. Wrap up, final questions and answers, evaluation; CEUs: Realtors Association staff member, Amy Ransom Thanks for coming! - 1279- REALTOR'S DAY TOUR April 21, 2004 Gillespie Center Left on Bartlett Blvd Lost Lake Channel Left on Lakewood Lane, left on Wilshire Blvd Public Safety facility Right into Shoreline Plaza Shoreline Plaza Balboa Center Left on Shoreline Drive County Road 15 realignment project Left on Auditor's Road Lost Lake Greenway project Mound Harbor Renaissance project Cross Commerce Blvd to Langdon District Left on Commerce Blvd, left at Lynwood Blvd Right into MoundMarket Place, skirting the lot, passing to Village by the Bay Right on to Alder, right onto Commerce, immediate left on Church Street Pass through Commerce Place Left on Lynwood Blvd Right into True Value District, parking deck, farmer's market & transit station Post Office Public Works facility Right on Belmont Avenue, right on Lynwood, left on Commerce Blvd Gillespie Center - 1280- Programs open to al~'.dbcounts plus ~ny additional ben~u available to Member Cities and Counties Hoff Day~. tl4,4ro Sites JUNE 3: Collaboration Workshop: Skills for Success in a Changing Environment JULY 21: The Leadership Challenges of Dysfunctional Political Environments SEPT. 16: Accomplishing Your Agenda C WORKSHOPS FOR LOCAL GOVE~T Fu;¢ Days/e~cept where noted); Metro APRIL 14: Resiliency: Skills for Navigating through Change (Half Day) MAY 6: Managing ·your USe .of Time JUNE 9: The New LoCal GOvernment Supervisor OCT. 7: Negotiating Without Alienating OCT. 28~ The HOW Tos of CustOmer-Focused Service NOV. 10: Effective Communication in the Workplace Fees: Full Day' $125 J$80 Training:.NefworkMernbe~) Half DaY $50 ($40 Training NetworkMembet) Descriptions, presenters and registration form' available on the GTS website www. mngts.org, or by calling or emailing Lynn Gavin (051-222-7409 x204; Igavin@mngts.org). Interested in exploring a 2004 GTS Training NeNvork membership for your city or county? There's plenty of time left to take advantage of the benefits and cost savings for on-site training and consulting options as well as the various open enrollment workshops. Check th~.GTS Website www. mngts.org for full details or contact Mary .Sabatke (651~222-7409 x208; msobatke@mngts..org) T uv c,. Call Carol Schoeneek at 651-222-7409 x~05 GTS can tailor any of the workshops in the Land Use Catalogue to meet the current needs of your community and bring them to you. You choose the date and location, we provide the facully and materials! Benefits of this customized approach 'to land use training include: · " You choose the topics to be addressed by faculty · /' A diverse group from your community can attend - at an affordable group rate ," You are guaranteed a date and time convenient to the participants! · :?.,:'~' ..~:~!. ' .i!~il!i~'!~.!~'~i?;.'!:' ' ~'~ .... .' -1281 - GEN ,tNFO ON Government Training ServiceS.' is pleased to on(~e again Cfer'wbrksho~s.d~ig6edespe¢idllYfO.t?~lZ~.~plann~rs, Planning staff and students. Sessions provide opporf~r~itlesfor imdepth ~iOj~.curre~ittoPi~ar~dhad~!s~n:.appllc~l~n. While ~alny~fthese pro- grams and preseriters have beetf ~arl °f °ur Ptannlng'~iJritC~'ium for m~ Ye~si'~'~Ont~tt~ c°~an~ Ym'~Jsed ~ b d ensure today's Issues are addressed. We are also in{rbduClr~g~our~'~~ i~::2~,.: .... . p ated to PROGRAM FEATURES~II~CLUDF ¢~ AccomPlished facully with extensive backgrounds in both planning and Instruction ¢, Focus on current Issues and timely information ¢, Pradical content designed by a commiflee of p annlng experts and IoC~al offlc:Idis · ¢~ Extensive handouts and reference materials assembled to make your job easier ¢, Continuing real estate education credit offered for several courses CORE PROGRAMS & SPE-C_L~.L FOCUS PROGRAMS Core ~$cover basic Issues related to all cities, counties and townships regardless of size or location, As they h:a~e been designed 1o build upon each other, participants are encouraged to attend them in sequence. $,m~./~ F~cu$ ~mm~ cover speclfictoplcs of interest 1o jurisdictions addressing particular situations or issues. · WHO SHOULD'ATTEND? Members of planning commissions, boards of adjustment and appeals, and governing bodies in Minnesota citieS, C0u~fie$ and townships. Also valuable for members of'olheradVlsory commissions, housing and redevelopment authorities, staff, real estate professionals, and others working in areas related to specialized workshop topics. Some workshops are largeled to individuals with certain levels of experienc~/expertise. See individual workshop pages in this catalogue to help you deter- mine whlch courseJs} arebest foryoui ~ QUESTIONS? Carol Schoeneck (program)- cschoeneck@mngts.org 651~222,7409 extension 205 FEES The following registration fees include hondo ut materials and refreshment breaks. Lunch Is included in full-day programs only. $125/person - Full Day Workshops $ 50/person - Half Day Workshops Members of GTS Training Network*: $80/person - Full Day Workshops $40/person - Half Day Workshops Full-time Students: $50/person- Full Day Programs $25/person - Half Day *For information on the GT5 Training Network, see the insert or vigil ~ mngls, atp. REGISTRATION/CANCm/RTION Register at least seven days prior to the works, hop date using the form in this brochure..RII out one form per individual. Because registration Is limited jn most sites, we encourage early registra- tl°~ to guarantee y6ur spot On your preferred date! Fees will be refunded :less a $20 service fee If the registration is cancelled four working days. before the p. rogram~ You may substi- tu'te'an~the~ indj~Jidb~l fC~i jh&:Same.wor~!~op!a!any.tIm& ifYou f nd Y°u:cann°t:aflen'd?Sh'6U cqL~ti~:~t'J~r °th'er ~i:i~cuM~ances beyond our control) necessitate program cancellation or postponement, registrants wi ..be notified vlmannouncements:onW. CCZO.~A/~ radio and: . other local MinnesotO radio stations. WORKSHOP SITES All workshop sites are accessible to persons with dlsabllltlesand have ~Ohvenlent parking for particiPants. A small sleepirig room block has been reserved for the night before the seminar at the RadiSson Hotel in St. Cloud. Overnight accommodations are available at several hotels in Utile Falls and St. Paul. To obtain a listing, contact Government Training Services .at 651.222.7409 x204. St. Paul Little Fat~ ~ ~ Continuing Education and Conference c~ntet: i~Iti~' F6uhd~it on ~0r~fer'enceRo0m Radisson Hotel St. Cloud Unlverslly of Minnesota, St. Paul Campus': 40~ R~'st street S E 404 West St. Germoln (formerly Earle Brown Continuing Ed Cenler) 320.632.9255 320-654-1661 1890 Buford Avenue 651-624-3275 Environmental Quality Board Training Room 302 Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street 32-654-1661 - 1282- CorQ Cor~ program THE BASICS Approved for 6.0 hours of Continuing Rea I Estate Education Credit · This workshop provides the nuls and bolts of planning, zoning and subdivision regulation. Participants learn where they fit Into the planning and Zoning process, and how to maximize their impact. Among the topics to be addressed are: ,/ The history, the process, the results ,/ Implementation, exercising authority, zoning/subdivision ordinances, amendments, permits, enforce- ment ,/ Legal Ilmitolions, avoiding litigation, planning, zoning and subdivision laws, 'due process,' conducting a proper public hearing and recording your findings ,/ Who padicipates in the pianning& zoning process; where YOU fit in; how to maxi mize your impact ,/ Hands-on simulations of actual planning and zoning dltemmos Hot issues, answers to your questions AUDIENCE: Designed for those new to land use planning or interested in an extensive review of the fundamentals FACUL1Y: N~al Blanchett is a member of the Bloomington law firm of Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren where his main areas of practice are land use, municipal and real estate development law. Bob Lock¥~clr has extensive hands-on experience in both writing and implementing zoning and subdMsion ordinances. He has worked for city, town, counly and state planning departments in Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota. His most recent position was Planning Director for Washington County, Minnesota. BEYOND THE BASICS Approvedfor6.ShoursofContinuingRealEstaleEducafionCredit Participants learn about using and preparing planning and zoning tools to deal with a wide variety of develop- ment issues and obtain an in-depth review of the planning process. Altendees will learn: · / A quick review of the history, source and limitations of authorily to plan and zone; basic land use and zoning tools and standards; and fundamental legal principles ,/ The process and elements of comprehensvie planning ,/ Innovative ways to guide land use development; from PUDs and performance zoning to design guidelines and other "cuffing edge' applications ,/ Preparalion and use of planning tools to handle various development problems ,," The plonnlng process in depth--from proper legal notice to development of findings of fact ,/ Legal issues in depth--what is a taking? When are variances justified? How to manage the 60-day rule? ,," A brief overview of Minnesola's environmental review procedures---EAW, ElS, and the newer, more flexible AUAR process v' Case studies--actual urban, suburban and rural situations! ,/ Answers to your questions on community zoning issues AUDIENCE: Intended for those who have a solid general knowledge of the planning process 11-2 years on Council, Board or Zoning/Planning CommissionJ or who have attended 'The Basics' FACULTY: Phil Carlson has consulted on planning issues for 25 years with the Minneapolis firm of Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban, Inc. In addition to writing zoning ordinances for those communities, Mr. Carlson also wrote the design guidelines for Bumsvtlle's Head of lhe City development, West St. Paul's Robed $lreel corddor and Mankato's Urban Design Framework. Desyl Paterson has been the Minnetonko City Attorney since 1984. She has been President of the Minnesota City Ati'orneys Assodation, the Hennepin County Local Government Law Committee and a member of the League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors. - 1283- ADVANCED ZONING APPLICATIONS .... Approved for &Ohours of Continuing Real Estate Education Credit This ~O~'kShop SUpPlements other land use planning programming and offers a more In-depth exploration of land use iSSues, partiCipants abra n a more comprehensive understanding of such Issues as: ,/ How tO'break out of the 'Misuse of Variances Syndrome' Understanding proper use, and limitations to the use, of conditional use permits . ,/ Establishing and utlllzing a planned use development ordinance that provides fieXlbtllty and enhanced control v' Understanding the benefits provlded by Performance Zoning v' HoWto approach the regulation of signs v' Howto IncorPorate Urban Design standards Into community, zoning ordinance ,/ Update and discussion of recent court cases and their implications ,/ Regulate challenging uses when faced with Federal pre-emption or constitutional limitations - telecommunication facilities, adult uses v' Incorporating natural resources Into your planning process AUDIENCe=: Designed for those who have a thorough knowledge of land use issues 13+ years of experlencel orwho hove oltended both 'The Boslcs' and 'Beyond the Basics.' It Is Portlculorly valuable for staff. John Shordlow is President and Director of Planning for Dohlgren, Shordlow & Ubon, Inc., consulting planners and landscape architects, In 25+ years of pr6fessional practice, he has asststeal nearly 100 cities and counties in pr rin and implementing their comprehensive Plans, Zoning ordinances, subdivision r~gulatians. epa g M~ff a~'old, a partner at the Iowfirm of Campbell Knutson, Is the City Altomey for the cities of 8urnsvllle, Big Lake,.' Monticello and Hampton. AS':P NNING rogmm Core As a ~ou contrlbute~hOu¢s.of u~ ,g. ln thiScapacity s a blt. more challenging:than antlClPdf~d?':TI,iis WorkSh0p'~ 0~ what Y0q need lo knowlo be successfu! In this Important position. You'll learn pra~tl(~al tips thal can mal<ethe difference bejWeen results and regrets. (NOTE Thls workshop is an adaptation Of last yeaffs program for Planning Commission Chairs.) Topics Include~ ,/ Keeping the'Big Piclure' in mind v' Seffing significant (but reallSfld Comrnlsslon goals and workplan ,/ Changing non,prodUctiVe PdflefnS Of Wotk ,/ Forging heqlthy re oflonshlpS with elecled'offidals and staff IPlUs...Whol fo do if those relotio~ishlps are unhealthy!l-.. v' Strotegles for foclllloflng public porfldpaflon In the planning process-from [nformoflono workshops through public meetings · ,' Effective tools and techniques [models for o planning' report and findings of fad designed to complement one on0ther, primer on po,rllomentory procedure) ..... ,/ Hahdllng c0ntr'~v~rsiai issues . AUDIENCE~ Members of City, County, Township Planning Commissions; also valuable for members Of BOardS of Adlustment and Appeals and other adv son/commissions FAC.'Ui3¥: John Shardlow.ls President ahd Diredot 0f Planning for Dah gren, Shardlow & Uban, Inc., consulting' planners and landscape atdilt~:tsl In 25+ years of ProfesSional practice, he has assisted nearly 100 cities and counties in prepa~lng and Imp!~entlr)gthelr comprehenstve plans, zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations. Hels strongly commuted tO helpinglocal officials gain'the knowledge and skills needed for effective citizen input well-run ~Ubli~ meetlrigs and informed recommendations O~ decisiOns. ' · - 1284- Special Focus Special Focus Program .Special Focus Progmm LOCAL GOVERNMENT 101 Continuing mol ~ education cmdils pending. Confusion and misunderstandings about the different levels of local government are very' common-even among those who serve in one of them! Whether you are an elected official, staff member or interested citizen, this workshop will help you see how each fits into the big picture. Learn about the services provided, strudures, roles, responsibilities, mandates, and funding for cities, counties, townships & regional governments. Discover the commonalities and differences between lhose jurisdidions; the interrelationships and challenges. Explore lhe realities of local government today wlth two experts who have diverse experience. Leave wlth answers to your questions and a handy resource booklet for future reference. AUDIENCE: Elected officials, advisory commission members, stafffrom cities, counties, townships, regional governments, special jurisdidions; real eslate professionals, interested citizens. FACULTY: Craig R. Rapp has been City Manager in three cities, Community Development Director of the Metropolitan Coundl, and Managing Principal of a planning and urban design firm. Currently, as a national trainer, consultant, and adjund university facully member, he has a special interest in enhancing the skills of those in local government. David Unmocht, Scott County Administrator, has aver 20 years experience in local government management. This includes 10 years in city government and 6 years as Deputy Counly Administrator in Dakota County. SPOTLIGHT ON SUBDIVISIONS Cor."nuing .- .. uc,,on ,,p ding. This half-day program is designed to give the participant a basic understanding of the issues surrounding review and approval of subdivisions. Background information will cover creating and enforcing subdivision regulations, a glossary of terms, and a review of all of lhe elements included in a subdivision proposal. A series of examples and case studies will be used to illustrate and explain effective subdivision design, taking into account the provision of street rights of way, utility easements, building pads, lot access, roadway design, grading and drainage, relationships between different land uses, wetlands, park dedication and related issues. The case studies include both simple and more complicated examples. AUDIENCE: Planning commissioners, city council members & staff of communities large and small throughout lhe state that still have land 1o subdivide and are facing development pressure on vacant land; of special interest to real estate professionals, lenders and bankers as well FACULTY C. John Uban is CEO of Dahlgren, Shardiow and Uban, Inc., a Minneapolis consulting firm. Mr. Uban has thirty years experience in planning and design projects in the Upper Midwest, and has been the lead planner for numerous residential subdivisions on behalf of major developers and builders in the Twin aties Metro Area. SO YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT PLANNING & ZONING! Have the land prices in your area started to spiral upward? Are you experiencing a tot of new housing starts? Is there a new commercial enterprise knocking at your door?. Do you want to guide this new growth rather than read to II? If your County, Township, Village or City hasn't been Involved in land use planning and zoning, but you're interested in exploring the possibility, this ls the program for you. Come for an introduction on what Its all about and the chance to ask allyour questions. Gain an understanding of the benefits of creating a comprehensive plan, and learn the payoffs and pitfalls of adopting a land use regulation. Leave With lhe information your community needs to lurn your ideas into reallly. AUDIENCE: Local elected officials and staff. FACULTY: Bob Lockyear has extensive hands-on experience in both writing and implementing zoning and subdivision ordinances. He has worked for city, town, county and state planning departments in Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota. His most recent position was Planning Director for Washington County, Minnesota. -1285- :SITE .PLANNING ..B IC$ Special FOCUS: Manystaff planners and appointed citizen planners are Called Upon to ~eVlew site plans and render opln 0% aboutthelr adequacy and Consist~ncywlth io% codes and ordin%Ces. In many cases, theSe planners have Illtle If any design baCkgrOund and laCk the knowledge and SkillS'to effectively ConduCt lhls important work. Is,coUrs.e, ts ~eSl.gned to he P Close that gap! PartiCipants Wlll: . Learn me fundamentals of Site analysiS and site p:!ann ng through simplified, Illustrative graphics ,/. Apply these.basic.elements In an easy to follow, steP.by,Step rev ew of a number of different prole~s ,/ Be guided through a model checklist for subdivision and Slte plan review ,/ Become;familiar with the effeds that ordinances and regulations have on the site Planning process and gain Insight into some of the unintended results ' ,/ Take away several practlcol tools for use long after the course is over. / Special bonus: Free resource CD-ROM to oll podiclponts! AUDIENCE: Especially for non.design professionals and citizen planners; open to anyone called upOn to review site plans FACULTY: John Shardlow Is President and Director of Planning for Dahtgren; Shardl0W& Uban, nc ,consulting planners :and landscape architects. Iff '25+ yedr~ of I~r0feSsi0fial Pract c~; he h'Ci~ ~sslsted ~eacly i00 cltie~ in( Countle pr iparlr Imp emenflfig thelf~0~Pfehens~% dns, z6n ~g OrdJ~d:~¢~i ~0bd v s ofi'~eg~iatlOris : ' . i;.~.:.. ..... .: .::.:..: . : ~ . .... . STRIKING GOLD: FINDING YOUR CoMpETITIVE ADVANTAGE Discover yC~U~ coi-n~bnifi/s golden aSSetS that can r'hake it competitive In a,globaJ economy Th, s'workshop will provlde a good'"Und~'stdrlaihg ofvai;iOus busin~ d~elo~e~ aPproach~such'.os business cluster-s, and outline ~he 'diamond 6~ adga'nfa~? Va'riou~ case studie~ Will pro~de exa"mp~es of'communities that have used.the 'go~d miniog P[0~e~.] to. cgpitgl ~e o.n thei[ strengths and the enthusiasm ofloca leaders;to, ke~ the Plan an'~ pfOdud alive. Pa~l~jpa~ts :will lea~ ways l~,, . ' / un~e~n'd fh'~ el~m'~htS ~f c'0~~fltive Od~dntageln 'a.W~rld economy / Identl~ the competitive advantage In their area / Workwllh their unique busine~ clu~er to develop o comprehensive ~rate~ and Implementation ~lan / MorkeHhelr commu nl~4prospe~) to ihe r strengths / Wo~ ~n collaboration for-economlcsucce~ AUDIE~E: Coun~ and Ci~ Admlni~rators, Coun~ Board and Q~ Council memos, Economic D~ment Board and staff, ~ambe¢'~f Commerce mem~s and ~aff~ OcaJ 'eg S at~S, ~tate Age~cy¢~Onn~l,.Reg~i Deve opment co~mi~!~O~ ~;~.~b~rs and sfaff' IR~RB ~nd Bbard mem~rs,.io~al N~p~pe~;Editom and ots~ Oca busl~s o~e~h'~,~i~i~¥~' . : .. ~ ~lls ~ecu~ve DIr~or of~e Green~h Housing A~h0~. Bef~e Ioining i~ Housing A~ho~, hewas Dlredor of Housing and Economic D~o~ment for the ~ of ~ahk~°. ~rge, ~b '~s wo~ on eco~m c d~elop- ment proleds In various pa,s of ~e'Unlted St~ for over. ~0 yea~, is'~ in htr-field for'0~i~anding achievements In hou~ng and ~onomlc development hay ng receded ~veral ~ards and acclima~on~, ~amh~l ~lS Managing Panner,~ Inve~ors R~I E'~ate :"Pr~ ously, Marshall provi~e~ dlr~t0n to CI~ economic development prOgramE as ~u~e,Diredor,of~e St, Cloud ~Heuslng end R~dev~lop~ A~hor~, commu': ni~ Deveiopmenl b lector f~r ~eQ~ of.Su~rior, and ~ssistant Business ~oper'f0r~the Cl,.of Duluth. Ri~ K~r, AICR ~ldefit ~f Midwe~ ~annlng end Design has oveFS0 years o~Pedence tn planning and ~onomlc development, His ~ecial inter~t in communl~ dev~opment:haS, led ~im to.f~,fmolate, e~brace and imple. ment ~onomic d~elopment proleds in ~veral communities, ~ a pr~ate developer he was in~rumenml in develop ng molar proleds In various ~ of the Unit~ Stat~. - 1286- ..... ~ I i, I ,Ii ,& i , II ~,,~ I Special Focus Program Special Focus Program ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING: Choosing the Best Approach for Your Community! The Minnesota Environmenfal Policy Ad (MEPA) requires government officials and prtvate developers to analyze the polential environmenlal Impacts of proposed adions and alternatives in order to make lnfbrmed decisions on whether and how to proceed. Which option - on EtS, EAW, or AUAR - makes the most sense for your community? What are the procedures involved? How do you link the [Jndings back: to your zoning ordinances and other community planning efforts? Through presentations and hands-on exercises, this program will provide excellent information on MEPA requirements and state rules as well os the decision- making tools needed for implementation. Topics include: / State and federal requirements- an overview ./ Recent court rulings affeding MEPA ,/ The Environmental Impact Statement, the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, the Alternative Urban Areawide Review- purpose, what's involved, pros and cons, Minnesota examples of each approach ,/ The process (participants use the EAW to assess the impad of a hypothetical project) v' Keys to successful implementation -from document preparation and review lo mitigation & monitoring v' Special bonus: Free resource CD-ROM lo alt participants! AUDIENCE: Eleded officials, senior government staff, professionals involved in making decisions that could affed the environment or providing information for those decisions FACULTY: Ken Nlmmer is owner of IMPACT Planning, a community and environmental pla nning firm specializing in environmental assessments, environmental baseline surveys, land transfer and development projects, and local compre- hensive plans. He is a Registered Environmental Manager wth 12 years experience administering community and environmental planning programs. Welter Rockenstein, a partner with Faegre & Benson, focuses his law practice on environmental reviews, environmental permitting. Recent projects include the Minnesota Orchestra's proposed amphitheater in Brooklyn Park, Best Buy's Corporate headquarters in Richfield, and the expansion of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Jan Lm'sen has been Principal Planner for the EnvirOnmental Review Program of the Environmental Quality Board since 1995. Previous positions included Diredor of Research for the Institute of Environmental Assessment and for the Minnesota Institute of Public Health. Ken Pekarek - a registered Landscape Architect with over 35 years experience in Geographic information Systems, coordinates software development and training for Minnesota Planning's EPPL7 system. Hannah Dunevilz. a Regional Plant Ecologist who has worked for Minnesota DNR for 17 years, currently provides ecological assistance to communities in central Minnesota. USING THE AUAR: Planning for Environmental impads This workshop is designed for those inlerested In a more in-depth focus on the Alternative Urban Areawide Review IAUAR), a discretionary, alternative process used to accomplish environmental review for on entire development zone or area under certain circumstances. The AUAR can be a convenient and economical approach for local governments seeking to engage in environmental review of development projeds already proposed, or wishing to influence development trends of prospedive projeds. Topics include: / How AUAR compares to the EAW, EIS ,/ Pros and cons; when to choose the AUAR method / The process, key components, updates / Relationship to comprehensive planning / Case Study- City of Maple Grove ,/ Legal and financial considerations ,/ Special bonus:Free resource CD-ROM to all s participants! AUDIENCE: Etecled officials, enior government staff, professionals involved in making decisions that could affed the environment or providing information for those decisions FACULTY: Ken Nimmer, Walter Rockenst~ln, Jen Larsen and Ken Pekarek - SEE DESCRIPTIONS ABOVE Bob Waibel - Bob Waibel has been with the City of Maple Grove since 1984, first as City Planner and currently as Commu- nity Development Director. He has coordinated five Alternative Urban Areawide Reviews (AUARs), the development and completion of the Special Area Plan for the approximate 2,000--acre Maple Grove Gravel Mining Area and, most recently, the completi~.n of the Mao e Grove 2020 Comprehensi~ :: . ~"~.~'.:...:,,~..~.:':~'::::: · ~ .',,~ ~ '~ ~,.r~ · ~ ~":~"~..~.:~.':,,:..~.':-:~.:...:::,."~: ~ ...... ~..,~ .... .,......E~~,~ ......... ~ ~.:...,..,,...,..,.,:..,.,..,.::~..:.,.. .:~' ..... ~ .:.: ......... ?~ ,:...';!.!.'..~-~, :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~::: .::: .. · ,,..'.."~..'.:::~:-~:.:~:::;.:..,,t:~;: First· Name ~; Last Name Title Jurisdiction/Agency Street Address city Daytime Phone.:, Fax Number Note: Please prOVide your e-mall address so we may confirm your registration. workshoP. ODtiOns; IC,.~.a~i:~.~..gp.,~!y,)' The Basics $125 [$80 Training Ne/work/ r-'-J April 28- Little Falls j---J May 6- St. Paul ~ Junelg-St. Paul Be~nd iheBasics $125 f$80 Trgining Netwo#d June 2.~ Little Fa)Is ~ j---] June 9- St. Paul How long in this pastil ~ Please'bi me at above address Advanced Zoning Applications $125/580 Training Network) p, oi#~ '." .. r--'] June 17- Little Falls ........ · NOTE: A~ $8/AG~.NC~ 81~UNO ~EE ~ZZ I'"'"] JU!Y14' .St. _P. au, o_~tionnbtaVoifaSletoStUder~i~..~ Your Role:~ Plattning COmrniSSion '~ber $50 {$40 TN/ ~-~ Credit Card (VISA at MasterCard only): ~ay 8, Little Falls · June 2 -~ St..Paul Site Planning Basics $!25 158o. Trai~ing Network) F"-I 4-st.Paul' Environmental Planning $125 (580 Training Networld J'--"l June 10- St. Paul ~a~'n,~r~g Ne~ortd StriktngGold:,RndingYour competitiVe Advantage $125 f580 Training Netwofld [-"] Ap~)129-"St. a0ud SpOt~ght on s~bdivisi,on$ $50/$40TrainingNetwor~J ~ May 13 - St. Paul So You're Th!~h~"A~ut ~ianning and Zoning $5~ l$40 Training Nelwor~,? :. : . ~ July 28 - Little Foils State Zip CoMirmatlons will be serif one week befo~e,~,~op. Registration Options,'. F-"I Regu ar J---J Member, GTS Training Network. Jdlscount) [~Student at " Payment'Optio_~; ~ Enclosed is check # ;:,In,the: amot~Ftt Of,: $ (payable lo Government Training Card# , , E-mall addres~' (required'): Check. he,elf this is a dUi~'ticdte cO you have a ready reg stered by f~Xr FOR FURTHER INFORMATION at ~'°tit~di ~r0 Scfioe~k 65i~222.7409 ext. 205 ~ °i;~ch0eneCk@mnatS MN Toll Free: 800.569-6880 Braille mttterials, etd. F--1 - 1288- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 26, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance Request- New House Construction OWNER / APPLICANT: Scot and Jacqueline Kirk PLANNING 'CASE NUMBER: 04-06 LOCATION: 2163 Fairview Lane PID: 13-117-24-43-0070 ZONING: R-lA Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential ADDITIONAL INFORMATION On April 26, 2004, the applicant hand-delivered a revised survey to reflect the minimum (10) foot front setback as recommended by the Planning Commission at its April 19, 2004 meeting. Members of the City Council will note that the revised deck plan shows the steps relocated back to the west side. However, as the proposed steps are located 2.5 feet from the property line they are consistent with City Code Section 350:440, Subd. 3 (B) which allows steps to be located no less than two (2) feet from any lot line. CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. K (2) I /. Lot 2, Block 2, L. P. Crevier's Subdivision of part of Lot 36, Lafayette Park, except the West 20 feet and also except the South 8 feet of the East 20 feet; thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; AND Lot 16, Block 2, L. P. Crevier's Subdivision of part of Lot 36, Lathyette Park, except the South 8 feet thereoi~ Hennepin County, Minnesota. BM- r-i= WOOD'STAKE PLACED O = IRON MON. SET O= IRON MON. INPLACE BEARINGS ON PROPOSED INFORMATION GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. ASSUMED DATUM 1ST FLOOR ELEV. ~1, ~ 'TOP BLOCK ELEV. ~'~. ~' BASEMENT ELEV. E&P ~, = DRAINAGE 000.0 = EXIST. ELEV. (000.0) = PROPOSED ELEV. 000.0 = EXIST. & PROP. ELEV. I her.by certify th.t this ce~ificate of survey was pr'p'red bY me ~ SCHOBORG or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land IAi ID SURVEYING Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. BOOK - PAGE INC. )2..~l,,) ~/~ l .~ /~~p~pu_o~ , (_ SCALE 8997 Co. Rd. 13 SE .... ~ 763-972-3:Z21 E~__no, MN 553_'P~ Date: S~t. ~g~ '~ Registration No. 147~0 / 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - ADDENDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director ~...._.._~ DATE: April 27, 2004 SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Review of Text Amendments to City Code - Temporary Membrane Structures (Continued from April 13, 2004 Meeting) APPLICANT: City of Mound ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Consultant Planner will be presenting the background regarding the proposed ordinance at the City Council meeting this evening. Please refer to the following comments from Acting City Attorney Mary Tietjen regarding a number of minor suggested changes to the proposed ordinance. Ms. Tietjen will be present at the meeting to provide further comment if needed. Her comments are summarized as follows: 1. Paragraph (B) Fee -- strike "or by ordinance" at the end of the sentence. 2. Consistently use "temporary membrane structures" throughout the ordinance because that is how you defined it (rather than "temporary membrane-covered buildings, etc). 3. Paragraph (C) (b) -- is the structure or the property not to exceed 400 square feet? (it's a little confusing). 4. Paragraph (C) (e) and (f) -- do you need both of these? They seem redundant. Also, in paragraph (e), you may wish to clarify the 40 percent hardcover restriction for lots of record. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 (A)