Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2004-05-11
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2004 - 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting - Pledge of Allegiance 2. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes: April 26, 2004 Joint PC/CC meeting April 27, 2004 regular meeting April 29, 2004 disaster training exercise 1289-1290 1291-1295 1296 *B. Approve payment of claims 1297-1320 *C. Approve an ordinance adding section 903 to Chapter IX of the City Code prohibiting fishing at certain portions' of the Lost Lake Channel 1321 *D. Approvals for Mound Fire Department Fish Fry_ 1. Public Dance Permit 2. Temporary On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Permit 3. Temporary Set-up License (Consumption and Display) 1322 *E. Approve partial payment #5 to Environmental Associates for work on Lost Lake Greenway Project 1323-1338 *F. Proclaim Buddy Poppy Day - Veterans of Foreign Wars 1339-1341 *G. Approve Public Gathering Permit: Fishers of Men 1342-1343- *H. Approve Tree Removal & Treatment License: Pro Tree Service (after the fact) 1344 *I. Planning Commission Recommendations 1. Case #04-08: JeffHanratty 1749 Bluebird Lane Variance: deck/porch construction PC rec: approval with conditions 1345-1350 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Case #04-10: Eva Hasch 4804-4820 Northern Road Variance: deck replacement PC rec: approval with conditions 1351-1363 Case #04-11: Allison Fish/Scott Fredrickson 4679 Hampton Road Variance: garage addition PC rec: approval with conditions 1364-1375 *J. Case #04-07: Vincent Reis 5853 Fairfield Road Waiver of Platting: 2 lots Staff rec: approval with conditions 1376-1386 Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) Report on Harbor Wine and Spirits Gala Wine Tasting Benefit by Manager John Colotti 1387-1388 Consideration/action on Floodplain Alteration Permit: Mark and Becky Lee - 1975-1989 Lakeside Lane 1389-1395 Proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance - Temporary Membrane Structures 1396-1397 Action on Labor Agreement between the City of Mound and Minnesota Teamsters Union, Local No. 320: Public Works Workers, Jan 1, 2004- Dec 31, 2005 1398-1399 Executive Session for City Manager's performance evaluation, with action on resolution extending contract and setting salary 10. Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Article: Six reasons why it's best to work through the manager 1400-1401 B. Update: County Road 15 Reconstruction Project 1402 C. Letter to the Editor: Meyer said no to land deal 1403 D. Report: Harbor Wine & Spirits - Apr 2004 1404 E. LMC: Friday Fax 1405-1408 F. Correspondence: LMCD 1409-1424 11. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City qfMound web site: www. citvofmound, com. COUNCIL BRIEFING May 1L 2004 Upcomin~ Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! May 10 - 6:30 - Parks facility tour and Public Works needs assessment workshop (meet at City Hall) May 11 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting May 15 - 8:00-3:00 - Recycling Day - Minnetrista Public Works May 18 - 6:30 - HRA workshop with MHRD on dockage in Lost Lake District May 22 - 10:00-2:00 - City Silent Auction of Surplus Goods - City Hall & Public Safety May 25 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting May 25 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting June 5 - 3:00-12:00 - Mound Fire Department Fish Fry June 6 -DARE Open June 18 - 8:00 a.m. - City Golf Outing Aug 21-22 - Mound Art in the Park Upcoming Absences May 12-14 Kandis Hanson Conference Admin Offices Closed May 31 Memorial Day July 5 Independence Day hoto ID's · ounc. il Members are asked to come to City Hall by about 7:10 pm, prior to this Council Meeting, to take all new p~ctures for your photo id's. Enter the lobby, take the stairs down, turn right, turn right again at the bottom of the second flight of stairs, enter the tv room, where the camera is set up. Bonnie will take your photo. Driver's Check Policy Supervisors have just recently approved an internal policy that allows them to periodically check the driving record of their staff members. This is important since all of our j ob descriptions require a valid MN driver's license. It is also important since an employee with poor driving habits can present a liability to the City. The driving background 'is one of the considerations for each new hire, as well. Count~ Road 15 Realignment The County was unable to secure rights of entry to both SA and the Maxwell property in time for the work to begin. They were also unsuccessful in attaining an easement from Reed and Pond in time to start construction of the water storage pond to the west of their location. Even though these are not our responsibilities, Carlton and I were successful in attaining the cooperation of all three within the past week. Once again .... relationships pay off! Now the project can proceed unimpeded. Congrats to Carlton! The County has assigned an inspector to the Mound project who is inexperienced, he being a surveyor in real life. We are monitoring the management of this project closely, and feel it is important that he receive the public complaints when he won't hear our suggestions for improving the traffic situation. We won't let too much time go by before we draw the attention of his supervisor if his management of the project doesn't improve. lerk, v Meeting The Mayor and I have invited members of the Mound area clergy to a meeting today--Friday. We will air the tape and provide copies of a letter being circulated to some clergy. We will clear up some of the misconceptions circulating and impress upon them the importance of their advocacy on our behalf. ,i ,Il , ali ~i ~ Ill , L,ill Ci~, Hall Driveway Entrance We are aware that the opening to the parking lot at City Hall does not function properly. SEH has agreed to remove it and replace it. I realize that creates more discomfort in regards to our comings and goings, but it is ~ore important that the grade and the width of the drive be corrected for the long term. The improvement will ~..,,3Vhappen this summer. Golf Outing Council members are invited to the golf outing scheduled for June 18. Announcements will go out in the next month. Golfers will be asked to register their group in advance. Get your group together now! Municipal Retailer of the Year Nomination Council members are reminded that John Colotti has been nominated as municipal retailer of the year by the Minnesota Municipal Beverage Association. They will announce the winner at their conference late in May. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 26, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota met in special session on Monday, April 26, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Mark Hanus, Dave Osmek and Peter Meyer. Members Absent: Councilmember Bob Brown Others Present: Planning Commissioner Chair Geoff Michael, Planning Commissioner Mike Mueller, Planning Commissioner Becky Glister, Planning Commissioner John Schwingler, Planning Commissioner David Miller, Planning Commissioner Jorj Ayaz (arrived at 7:15 p.m), Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Consultant Planner Loren Gordon. 1. Open Meetin.q Mayor Meisel called the joint City Council and Planning Commission special meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. 2004 Planninq Commission Project Lists Discusson Mayor Meisel stated that Planning Commissioner Chair Geoff Michael would lead the joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting. Michael commented that Planning Commisisoner Ayaz contacted him in advance to advise that he would be attending the workshop but would be late. Members of the City Council and Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project list dated March 29, 2004 as prepared by Staff and prioritized the list as follows: 6. 7. 8. Review of front setback for undeveloped streets and review of the definition of "front setback" in the City Code. Amendment to Pedestrian District lakeshore setback requirement for consistency with other zoning districts. Review of City Code 350.420 (Nonconforming regulations). Review of floodplain ordinance and map for consistency with 2004 Hennepin County Floodplain Study Review of City Code 350.440 (Required yards and open space regulations). Review of 350.435 (Accessory buildings regulations). Fence regulations. Driveway regulations. 1 - 1289- Mound City Council Minutes - Apdl 26, 2004 Staff will also work on the following items for upcoming Planning Commission and City Council review: 1. Lakeshore access for adjacent properties which are physically separated by a physical feature (ie. County Road). 2. Review of wetland regulations. 3. Bluff regulations. 4. Driveway standards. 5. Review of grading activities in shoreland areas 6. MCWD notification requirements Discussion regarding Planning Commission review of stormwater, floodplain alteration, erosion control permits also took place as the present City Code requires City Council review and approval. Staff was directed to contact the Planning Commission Chair in advance for direction regarding whether the application should also be considered for review by the Planning Commission. 3. Adjourn Motion by Osmek, seconded by Hanus, to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m. favor. Motion carried. All voted in Attest: Bonnie Rifler, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 - 1290- ............ ~ ~ ,&, ,Ii all ,I 4, II~ , ,,ii I C C hlOUND Cri'¥ COUNCIL N~INU'I'ES APRIL 27, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, April 27, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney Mary Tietjen, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, City Planner Loren Gordon, Tom Stokes, Jim Prosser Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roil carl vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meetinq and Pledge of Alleqiance Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Approve Aqenda Brown requested the addition of Item 10J, Loyalty Day, and Hanus requested the removal of item A from the consent agenda. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. Consent Aqenda MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda, with the removal of Item A as requested above. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. Do (removed) Approve payment of claims in the amount of $331,537.57. Approve one-year extension of contract with Waldron & Associates to provide back-up building inspection services. RESOLUTION NO. 04-47: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER DIBIAI XCEL ENERGY TO ALLOW EXPANSION AND UPGRADE OF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD. P&Z CASE #04-01 & 04-02. PID #13-117-24-33-0037 AND #13-117-24-33-0097, 1 -1291 - Mound Council Minutes - April 27, 2004 E. RESOLUTION NO. 04-48: RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBMITTAL OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT APPLICATION FOR PREPARATION OF A PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT AND PREPARATION OF A RESPONSE ACTIN PLAN (RAP) FOR THE AUDITOR'S ROAD DISTRICT. F. RESOLUTION NO. 04-49: RESOLUTON TO AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REQUESTING FUNDING FOR PREPARATION OF A PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT AND RESPONSE ACTION PLAN (RAP) ASSOCIATED WITH MULTI-USE FACILITY IN THE TRUE VALUE DISTRICT IN DOWNTOWN MOUND TO INCLUDE A FARMERS MARKET, DESIGNATED PARK AND RIDE STALLS, A PARKING DECK AND A TRANSIT STATION. G. Approve Restaurant Licenses (contingent upon receipt of all form and fees) for the year May 1, 2004 through April 30, 2005, for: Subway Sandwich & Salads; Al & Alma's Supper Club; House of Moy; Caribou Coffee #197; American Legion Club; Domino's Pizza; V.F.W. Post 5113; Carbone's Pizzeria; Happy Garden; Scotty B's; Dailey's Pub; Java Lounge. H. Approve Amusement Device Licenses for the V.F.W. and American Legion. I. Approve summer hours for City hall and Public Safety Administration Offices, to begin May 17 through September 3, 2004 as follows: Monday through Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m; Fridays 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. J. RESOLUTION NO. 04-50: RESOLUTION TO PROCLAIM 35TM ANNUAL MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK - MAY 2 THROUGH MAY 8, 2004. K. Approve Planning Commission Recommendations (1) RESOLUTION NO. 04-51: RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT YARD AND LAKESIDE SETBACK VARIANCES; DENYING A HARDCOVER VARIANCE FOR A COMPREHENSIVE REMODEL OF THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 4520 DENBIGH ROAD, LOT 3 AND THE NORTHWESTERLY HALF OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2, AVALON. P&Z CASE #04-03, PID #19-117-23-24-0100 (2) RESOLUTION NO. 04-52: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW A (10) FOOT FRONT SETBACK FROM LAKE BOULEVARD FOR THE NEW HOUSE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 2163 FAIRVlEW LANE. P&Z CASE #04-06. PID #13-117-24-43-0070. L. RESOLUTION NO. 04-53: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN EXCLUSIVE PERMANENT DRIVEWAY EASEMENT M. RESOLUTION NO. 04-54: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE 204B.16. 2 - 1292- Mound Council Minutes -April 27, 2004 3A. Approve Minutes Hanus noted a correction on page 5 of the minute~ of April 13, 2004, being under Item 9, the motion was made by Hanus and seconded by Brown. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to approve the minutes of April 13, 2004 as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Comments & Suqgestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. - None were offered. C 5. Public Hearinqs Proposed amendments to the Zoninq Ordinance - Temporary Membrane Structures (continuation of public hearinq on 4/13/04). Loren Gordon p resented an overview of the proposed zoning ordinance change and stated that it was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission by a vote of 4 to 1. Meisel asked for Osmek's comments, as he was the negative vote at the Planning Commission level. Osmek stated that there were two sections he was not in favor of. 4D states that temporary membrane-covered structures shall meet the appropriate setbacks for accessory buildings, and he feels that this would because of lot sizes, prohibit many residents from having one. 4H is the other section he had a problem with. It states that temporary membrane-covered buildings shall not be placed on residential property for more than (180) days within a (12) month period on a single premises unless an extension has been applied for (30) days prior to the expiration and is approved by the City Council. He feels that the CSO has better things to do than run around chasing down these structures, especially since they lend practical storage area rather than letting clutter sit all over the yard. They also mask clutter from the neighbors. Brown stated that we are trying so hard to change the appearance of Mound from smaller, cabin-like looking homes and he feels it a step backwards. He feels it's like allowing a boat house in the yard. Hanus expressed that he sees two distinctive directions to go - would it be better to look at the hoop houses or the junk that could be inside the hoop house. He also questioned the difference between a hoop house and boat canopies on docks. He also asked if these were permitted in commercial districts, as the City has one and the City must follow the same rules it imposes on it's citizens. Loren stated they talked about non-conforming structures at the staff level, and felt that if there is one that was erected prior to the ordinance, then it would be a legal non- conforming use, i.e., the City's. Meyer stated he is in favor of the proposed ordinance. 3 - 1293- Mound Council Minutes - April 27, 2004 Further discussion took place regarding the non-conforming structure issue, whether boat canopies would be considered temporary membrane structures, and if this proposed ordinance is actually what the Council would like to see enacted. Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. and asked for public comment. Upon receiving none, Brown made a motion to send this back to the Planning Commission, recommending that Mound not allow hoop houses at all. Motion died for lack of a second. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to continue the public hearing and table this item until May 11th, to allow for additional legal and staff review. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 6. A.qreement with HKGi for Preparation of AUAR for MHRD Downtown Project Loren reviewed the Hoisington Koegler Group has submitted a contract in the amount of $121,510.00 for preparation of an Alternative Urban Area Review (AUAR) for the Mound Harbor Renaissance Development redevelopment project. The AUAR process is outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 and serves as a substitute environmental review to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) or Environmental Impact Statement (ELS) processes. Hanus asked why this route is beneficial rather than the traditional EAW. Loren stated that the issues comes down to the level of detail that you get in terms of documenting conditions in that an EAW will do a portion of what the AUAR does, and the AUAR pins down development to parameters established. The work program considers development impacts on two scenarios, guidance under the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Regulations and the proposed MHRD development plan. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve entering into a contract for professional planning services for preparation of AUAR for Mound Harbor Renaissance Development project. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7. Pre-Sale of 2004 Bonds for 2004 Projects Jim Prosser of Ehlers & Associates presented the Council with a pre-sale report of the proposed three bond issues. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-55: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF $1,785,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2004A, $1,670,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY BONDS, SERIES 2004B, AND $540,000 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004C 4 - 1294- Mound Council Minutes - April 27, 2004 8. CSAH 15 Project Carlton Moore reviewed the project and the recommended resolutions. A. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-56: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND REALIGNMENT OF CSAH '15/110 B. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-57: RESOLUTION CALLING HEARING ON CONSTRUCTION AND REALIGNMENT OF CSAH 15/110 9. Action on Extension of Buildinq Permit Until Auqust 3'1, 2004 for 2647 Wested.qe Boulevard MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to approve the extension on the building permit until August 31,2004, for property located at 2647 Westedge Boulevard, as requested. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 10. Information/Miscellaneous A. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative B. Minutes: DCAC C. LMC Friday Fax D. FYI: PD letter to Spring Park E. Letter: Scholarship to Officer Burke from Chamber of Commerce F. Calendar: LMCC G. Report: Building Activity- March 2004 H. Minutes: Planning Commission - March 15 through April 19, 2004 I. Update: Planning and Building Inspections Department J. Loyalty Day- Brown asked to add this item, stating that Loyalty Day is May 1st, and there is a parade at 1:00 p.m., starting at the Veterans Home at Ft. Snelling. 11. Adjourn MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 8:17 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. C Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 5 - 1295- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 29, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Thursday, April 29, 2004, at 6:30 p.m. at the Public Safety Building in Mound. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, and Peter Meyer. Members Absent: David Osmek. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Parks Superintendent Jim Fackler, Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Police Chief Jim Kurtz, Lieutenant John McKinley 1. Disaster Trainin.q The City Council met to be a part of a Disaster Training Exercise, where members of City Staff, Police Department and Fire Department, presented a scenario where a tornado went through portions of the City of Mound, leaving damage and casualties. The exercise completed at 8:05 p.m. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1296- MAY 11, 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 042804S U E$26,100.29 APR 050504SU E $1,112.86 MAY 051104SUE $317,936.02MAY TOTAL $345,149.17 297- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 042804SUE Payments Refer 42804 CARBONE'S PIZZA Cash Payment Invoice 042804 Transaction Date City of Mound 04/29/04 8:57 AM Page 1 Payments User Dollar Amt $26,100.29 Computer Dollar Amt $26,100.29 $0.00 In Balance E 101-41110-434 Conference & Training 4/28/2004 4/29/2004 MEALS FOR DIASTER TRAINING $43.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $43.00 Refer 42804 JOHN DEERE GOVERNMENT/NAT/ Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA MOWER $24,944.36 Invoice 92548105 4/21/2004 PO 18191 Transaction Date 4/28/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24,944.38 Refer 42804 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 281-45210-533 Tree Removal 2132 OVERLAND RD $1,112.93 Invoice 4955 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,112.93 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $24,987.36 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $1,112.93 $26,100.29 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $26,100.29 $26,100.29 - 1298- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 050504SUE Payments Refer 50504 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA City of Mound Payments 05103/04 11:49 AM Page 1 Current Period: May 2004 User Dollar Amt $1,112.86 Computer Dollar Amt $1,112.86 $0.00 In Balance Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells NEW PHONE $245.73 Invoice 050504 5/5/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells RELOCATING TELEPHONES $525.00 Invoice 050504 5/5/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells CREDIT-RELOCATE PHONES IN CONTRACT -$210.00 Invoice 050504 5/5/2004 Transaction Date 4/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $560.73 Refer 50504 MINNESOTA, UNIVERSITY OF Cash Payment E 281-45210-434 Conference & Training MPWA REGISTRATION $32.00 Invoice 890434 4/7/2004 PO 18287 Cash Payment E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training MPWA REGISTRATION $32.00 Invoice 890434 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training MPWA REGISTRATION $32.00 Invoice 890434 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training MPWA REGISTRATION $32.00 C ?voice 890434 4/7/2004 ~ash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training MPWA REGISTRATION $32.00 Invoice 890434 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $160.00 Refer 50504 MOUND POST OFFICE Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs BULK MAILING UPDATE $45.00 Invoice 050504 5/5/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.00 Refer 50504 NICCUM, DANIEL Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE EXPENSES $347.13 Invoice 050504 5/5/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $347.13 C - 1299- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND City of Mound Payments 05/03/04 11:49 AM Page 2 Current Period: May 2004 10100 Wells Fargo $971.86 $32.00 $45.00 $32.0O $32.00 $1,112.86 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $1,112.86 $1,112.86 - 1300- CiTY OF MOUND Batch Name 051104SUE Payments City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page Payments Current Period: May 2004 ~; :,~,,' ~ ~'_ ~.,'~ ~ %~ 2~1~ ':. ~ _'~";~: ~i,, ,~,. T ~,i~,;;' User Dollar Amt $317,936.02 Computer Dollar Amt $317.936.02 $0.00 In Balance Refer 51104 ALERT-ALL CORPORATION Cash Payment E 222-42260-217 Fire Prevention Supplies CHILDREN'S TOYS $985.44 Invoice 4040035 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $985.44 Refer 51104 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INCO Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. PAGER REPAIRS $541~01 Invoice 59017 4/30/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $541.01 Refer 51104 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $126.72 Invoice 463413606 5/5/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $126.72 Refer 51104 BABB, PAUL Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE REDWOOD FALLS FIRE $191.20 SCHOOL Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $191.20 Refer 51104 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$297.75 Invoice 29281800 4/20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $85.95 Invoice 38333000 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $37.79 Invoice 38320900 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $73.00 Invoice 29276600 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,205.40 Invoice 29307400 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,057.35 Invoice 29315600 4/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $917.70 Invoice 29381100 4/20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $40.00 Invoice 28747000-B 4/20/2004 Transaction Date 4/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,119.44 Refer 51104 BERENT, BRIAN Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE DULUTH WATER RESCUE $129.60 TRAINING Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $129.60 ~¢~:;tefer 51104 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC. ~J~ash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 04-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $19.42 Invoice 0-0426-8003980- 4/30/2004 -1301 - CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 2 Current Period: May 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 1-0429-8003972 4/30/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos invoice 1-0200-1307131 4/30/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 1-0200-1307131- 4/30/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 1-0200-1307131 4/30/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Invoice 1-0200-1307149 4/30/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 04-04 MAIN STREET 04-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 04-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 04-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 04-04 GARBAGE SERVICE Wells Fargo 10100 $22.15 $33.24 $33.24 $33.24 $104.50 Total $245.79 Refer 51104 BLAINE, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training MCFOA REGION IV MEETING $20.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00 Refer 51104 BLUE LAGOON MARINE Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair WATER PUMP $360.44 Invoice 206556 4/28/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $360.44 Refer 51104 BRAND NETWORKING Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA NETWORK INSTALLATION $5,000.00 Invoice 15791 3/26/2004 Transaction Date 4/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 51104 BURL OAKS GOLFCLUB Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising WINE TASTING FOOD $3,195.06 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,195.06 Refer 51104 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 RepaidMaint Supply OIL FILTERS $0.00 Invoice N30778 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies ADAPTER $2.47 Invoice N30636 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply ADAPTER $2.47 Invoice N30636 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply ADAPTER $2.48 Invoice N30636 4/12/2004 Transaction Date 4/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7.42 Refer 51104 CA T AND FIDDLE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $541.00 Invoice 38751 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $651.00 invoice 38758 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,192.00 Refer 51104 CECE'S SIGNS Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MAGNETIC SIGNS $106.50 Invoice 1634 4/6/2004 - 1302- City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM ×~, ........ --"-~-~,~' Page 3 ~'~' Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MAGNETIC SIGNS Invoice 1634 4/6/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MAGNETIC SIGNS $17.75 Invoice 1634 4/6/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 P, epairs/Maint Machinery MAGNETIC SIGNS $t7.75 Invoice 1634 4/6/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $159.75 Refer 51104 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 03-17-04 THRU 04-19-04 $394.33 Invoice 051104 5/1112004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-383 Gas Utilities 03-17-04 THRU 04-19-04 $262.89 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $657.22 Refer 51104 CHADWlCKAND MERTZ Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 04-04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $6,411.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,411.00 Refer 51104 CHAMPION AUTO Cash Payment E 101-45200.404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SEA FOAM $10.42 ~,~l~lnvoice D254024 4/23/2004 ~,,~,...,[!~;ash Repairs/Maint Machinery EXTENSION $2.65 Payment E 101-45200-404 4-WAY --Invoice D254025 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WIRE CONNECTOR.TERMINALS $75.57 Invoice D253823 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WIRE CONNECTOR/TERMINAL $0.00 Invoice D253832 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HERCULINER QUART/OIL FILTER $42.58 Invoice D253658 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CHROME BALL $24.46 Invoice D255092 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies WIRE CONNECTOR $3.96 Invoice D252925 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies TRACTOR LIGHT $65.99 Invoice D254279 4/23/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $225.63 Refer 51104 CHIEF OF POLICE, ASSOC HENNE Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $50.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 PO 18354 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 51104 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, Cash Payment E 602.49450-328 Employment Advertising 04-24-04 CLASSIFIED AD $24.60 Invoice 32968 4/2012004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.60 ~,,,~e~fer 51104 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST '%'"""invoice 83464113 4/29/2004 Transaction Date 4/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.20 - 1303- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: May 2004 Refer 51104 COMPUTER CHEQUE Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 30-04 CHECK VERIFICATION $54.50 Invoice 10685020304 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 4/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.50 Refer 51104 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts PART FOR WATER PUMP $13.58 Invoice 25814 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts PART FOR WATER PUMP $13.58 Invoice 25814 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply PART FOR WATER PUMP $117.49 Invoice 25814 4/21/2004 PO 18297 Transaction Date 4/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.65 Refer 51104 COVERALL CLEANING CONCEPTS Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 05-04 CLEANING SERVICE $1,166.18 Invoice 85235 5/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 05-04 CLEANING SERVICE $504.38 Invoice 85235 5/10/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services 05-04 CLEANING SERVICE $756.58 Invoice 85235 5/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-460 Janitorial Services 05-04 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 Invoice 85235 5/10/2004 Cash Payment E 601~49400-460 Janitorial Services 05-04 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 Invoice 85235 5/10/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-460 Janitorial Services 05-04 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 Invoice 85235 5/10/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 05-04 CLEANING SERVICE $199.15 Invoice 85235 5/10/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,764.74 Refer 51104 DAWES WATER EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply CASE METERS $997.15 Invoice 3220429 4/16/2004 PO 18295 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply 1" METERS $355.08 Invoice 3222300 4/16/2004 PO 18298 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 1 1/2" METERS $739.59 Invoice 3221254 4/16/2004 PO 18298 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $115.86 Invoice 1967331 4/16/2004 PO 18302 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $115.86 Invoice 1967331 4/16/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $115.85 Invoice 1967331 4/16/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,439.39 Refer 51104 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale BEER $1,875.80 Invoice 262198 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale BEER $53.00 Invoice 262208 4/27/2004 -1304- City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Payments CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 263145 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 263150 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 51104 E-Z RECYCLING Current Period: May 2004 $1,048.10 $33.80 Total $3,010.70 Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-04 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $8,326.48 Invoice 6577 5/4/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,326.48 Refer 51104 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale BEER $56.70 Invoice 520863 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale BEER $2,988.25 Invoice 222528 4/2612004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,735.75 Invoice 222619 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $111.50 Invoice 43666 4/23/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,892.20 Ca efer 51104 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES sh Payment E 401-46540-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA THRU 04-04 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $121,724.83 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $121,724.83 Refer 51104 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES Cash Payment G 101-22989 MHR Spot Appraisals MHR SPOT APPRAISALS $75.00 Invoice 00-6136 3/19/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22989 MHR Spot Appraisals MHR SPOT APPRAISALS $799.50 Invoice 00-6179 4/1/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22989 MHR Spot Appraisals MHR SPOT APPRAISALS $225.00 Invoice 00-6223 3/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,099.50 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00 Invoice 199611 4/29/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Fargo 10100 Total ~32 00Wells Refer 51104 FLAi~i Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE REDWOOD FALLS $177.06 CONFERENCE Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $177.06 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells NEW PHONE $245.73 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 ash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells RELOCATING TELEPHONES $525.00 ~,,.~.~voice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells CREDIT-RELOCATE PHONES -$315.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 - 1 305- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 5/3/2004 City of Mound PaYments 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 6 Current Period: May 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $455.73 Refer 51104 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE AND RESC Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FIRE HOSE $376.23 Invoice 9003 3/28/2004 PO 18073 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies BUNKER BOOTS $642.00 Invoice 9052 3/28/2004 PO 18082 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,018.23 Refer 51104 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Cash Payment E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies 04-04 WATER SERVICE PRORATED $3.02 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3.02 Refer 51104 GRAND PERE WINES, INOORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $344.00 Invoice 13699 4/30/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $344.00 Refer 51104 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $735.00 Invoice 63711 4/29/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $735.00 Refer 51104 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $112.00 Invoice 877740 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $640.11 Invoice 877742 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,956.97 Invoice 877754 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $901.12 Invoice 881188 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $68.25 Invoice 881187 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $10,843.29 Invoice 881186 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $330.60 Invoice 881169 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,852.34 Refer 51104 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 REIMBURSE REDWOOD FALLS ARSON AWARENEWW $25.86 REIMBURSE PIZZA FOR STAFF TRAINING $58.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $83.86 Refer 51104 HATCH, JIM SALES COMPAY Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts BRUSH FOR ELGIN SWEEPER $2,061.84 Invoice 5807 4/9/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,061.84 - 1306- City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Payments Page 7 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2004 Refer 51104 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 4" PIPE $61.34 Invoice 042004 4/20/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.34 Refer 51104 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CE Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training NICCUM EMT REFRESHER COURSE $264.00 Invoice 10758 4/26/2004 PO 18353 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training BECK, EMT REFRESHER COURSE $264.00 Invoice 10758 4/26/2004 PO 18353 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $528.00 Refer 51104 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WOR Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs UTILITY PERMIT $50.00 Invoice UTIL00401 4/23/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 51104 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners JAN,FEB,MAR, BOOKING FEE $2,633.45 Invoice 126 4/20/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,633.45 Refer 51104 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R ash Payment E 101-41600450 Board of Prisoners 03-04 ROOM AND BOARD $2,652.00 "~,,-~'1 nvoice 000445 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,652.00 Refer 51104 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER( Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Transaction Date E 455-46381-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 455-46381-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 455-46381-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 455-46381-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 5/6/2004 #14-117-24-34-0065 PROPERTY TAX FULL YEAR #14-117-24-34-0066 PROPERTY TAX FIRST HALF #13-117-24-33-0038 PROPERTY TAX FIRST HALF #13-117-24-33-0095 PROPERTY TAX FULL YEAR #14-117-24-33-0086 PROPERTY TAX FULL YEAR #14-117-24-33-0087 PROPERTY TAX FIRST HALF $2.40 $221.49 $740.03 $3.66 $1.20 $117.66 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,086.44 Refer 51104 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs MAILING LABELS $118.75 Invoice 2004-44 4/9/2004 Oash Payment G 101-22916 1975 Lakeside Lane sub-#03 EASEMENT $21.00 voice 022304-B 2/23/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22950 4721 Aberdeen Rd. #03-34 S EASEMENT AND COPY $26.00 invoice 032604 3/26/2004 -1307- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 4/27/2004 City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 8 Payments Current Period: May 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165.75 Refer 51104 HENTGES, MATTHEW Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE ARSON CONFERENCE $25.86 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.86 Refer 51104 HOME DEPOT/GECF Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 RepaidMaint Supply SPLIT RAIL LINE POST $45.18 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 PO 18301 Transaction Date 4/28/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.18 Refer 51104 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 04-24-04 THRU 05-24-04 MAINTENANCE $151.46 Invoice 23222233 4/20/2004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.46 Refer 51104 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE MUNI Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions THRU 06-30-04 MEMBERSHIP $125.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 51104 ISLANDPARKSKELLY Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 1990 BOBCAT REPLACE FLAT $17.00 Invoice 15922 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery K2500 PICKUP R&R SEAL, ETC $212.54 Invoice 16025 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2002 CHEV SILVERADO REPLACE DTRL $23.37 BULBS Invoice 16058 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair 1986 CHEV R&R CAMSHAFT $1,175.89 Invoice 15976 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #845 OIL CHANGE $27.45 Invoice 16062 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #847 OIL CHANGE $48,01 Invoice 16060 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #6441OIL CHANGE/TEST PERFORMANCE $74,81 Invoice 15900 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #843 STOP LAMP BULB , $61.67 Invoice 15896 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #841 BELT/R&R TENSIONER $216.16 Invoice 15883 4/12/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,856.90 Refer 51104 JAKUBIK, MATTHEW Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE FDIC CONFERENCE $775.52 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $775.52 Refer 51104 JENNIGES, KEITH Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LIGHT FEE $10.50 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.50 -1308- CITY OF MOUND Refer 51104 Cash Payment Invoice 350785 Cash Payment Invoice 350783 Cash Payment Invoice 141256 Transaction Date City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 9 Payments JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS E 101-41910-430 Miscellaneous PLANTS 4/23/2004 G 101-22810 X-Mas Lights Donation/Expe HOLIDAY BULBS 4/23/2004 E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous NAPKINS,ETC 4/23/2004 4/26/2004 Wells Fargo Current Period: May 2004 $20.99 $183.00 $14.67 10100 Total $218.66 Refer 51104 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,614.99 Invoice 1711982 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $303.80 Invoice 1711983 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $694.40 Invoice 1711984 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale WINE $1,005.06 Invoice 1711985 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,474.41 Invoice 1715434 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $178.80 C }nvoice 1715435 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,079.83 Invoice 1715436 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $209.75 Invoice 1715437 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $512.70 Invoice 1715438 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $111.63 Invoice 1715785 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $160.00 Invoice 1715784 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,345.37 Refer 51104 JOHNSON, TIM(2) Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA BEAM TROLLEYS $265.00 Invoice 051104 4/19/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Refer 51104 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous COUNCIL COOKIES $27.93 Invoice 14712 4/3012004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $27,93 Refer 51104 KEEPERS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program MICROLITE KIT $327.95 Invoice 21847 2/19/2004 PO 18131 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $327.95 ~.~Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 03-04 REDEVELOP PROJECT AREA #1 $1,435.50 Invoice 61171-A 4/22/2004 - 1309- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 61171-B Cash Payment Invoice 61171-C Cash Payment Invoice 61171-D Cash Payment Invoice 61172-A Cash Payment Invoice 61172-B Cash Payment Invoice 61172-C Cash Payment Cash Payment Invoice 61172-E Cash Payment Invoice 61172-F Cash Payment City of Mound Payments 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 10 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 03-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $4,251.61 4/22/2004 G 101-22974 Bloomquist Hotel Developme 03-04 BLOOMQUIST HOTEL DEVELOPMENT $1,381.11 4/22/2004 E 455-46383-300 Professional Srvs $543.84 4/22/2004 E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs $2,745.94 4/22/2004 E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs $66.00 4/22/2004 E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs $472.05 4/22/2004 G 101-22977 NSP Excel #04-01/#04-02 Va 03-04 EXCEL LINE RELOCATION $150.00 03-04 CUSTER PURCHASE AGREEMENT 03-04 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT 03-04 DREAMWOOD LAWSUIT 03-04 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY Invoice 61172-D1 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 61172-D2 4/22/2004 E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 4/22/2004 E 101-41600-312 Legal Police 4/22/2004 E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs invoice 61172-G1 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 61172-G2 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs invoice 61172-G3 4/22/2004 03-04 EXECUTIVE $762.00 03-04 ADMINISTRATION $420.00 03-04 PUBLIC SAFETY $42.00 03-04 LEGAL STREETS $216.48 03-04 LEGAL WATER $216.48 03-04 LEGAL SEWER $216.47 Cash Payment G 101-22917 Three Points Var Becke #03- 03-04 53XX THREE PTS STODDARD Invoice 61172-H 1 4/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22891 Kells Lane Vacation, J. Paul 03-04 KELLS ROAD VACATION Invoice 61172-H2 4/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22895 Kells Lane Vacation Jeff Paul 03-04 KELLS ROAD VACATION Invoice 61172-H3 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I 03-04 MISC P/Z Invoice 61172-H4 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-318 Legal Parks 03-04 MISC PARKS Invoice 61172-1 4/22/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 $30.00 $24.00 $24.00 $385,00 $594.00 Total $13,976.48 Refer 51104 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COM Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs 01-01-04 THRU 03-31-04 PUBLIC ACCESS $10,576.04 FEE Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,576.04 Refer 51104 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 1ST&2ND QTR LEVY PAYMENT $9,790.27 Invoice 051104 4/29/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,790.27 Refer 51104 LAKE RESTORATION, INC. Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic BEACHWOOD POND CONTRACT $1,659.84 Invoice 29185 5/1/2004 -1310- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 11 Payments Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 51104 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT Invoice 957 4/10/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Current Period: May 2004 $1,659.84 $65.32 $65,32 Refer 51104 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials NON-FLAM PENTRTNG OIL $65.80 Invoice 1949182 4/20/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials NON-FLAM PENTRTNG OIL $65.80 Invoice 1949182 4/20/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials NON-FLAM PENTRTNG OIL $65.79 Invoice 1949182 4~20/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 RepaidMaint Supply TUFF-TORQ HEX NUT $40.88 Invoice 1962656 4/20/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $115.86 Invoice 1967331 4/2012004 PO 18302 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials SHQP SUPPLIES $115.86 Invoice 1967331 4/20/2004 PO 18302 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $115~85 Invoice 1967331 4/20/2004 PO 18302 OTransaction 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $585.84 Date Refer 51104 MAINSTREAM SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs 05-04 VIRUS FILTERING $17.97 Invoice 1140-12870 5/1/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs 05-04 VIRUS FILTERING $11 Invoice 1140-12870 5/1/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29.95 Refer 51104 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,364.71 Invoice 660351 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $18.40 Invoice 660352 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $28.00 Invoice 660353 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $162.00 Invoice 660923 4/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER -$0.10 Invoice 638110-B 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,270.26 Invoice 663021 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $37.30 Invoice 663022 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $28.00 Invoice 663023 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/28/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,908.57 ~-,?Refer 51104 MARLIN"S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-01-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $198.90 Invoice 13672 4/1/2004 -1311 - CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 12 Current Period: May 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-05-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $9.00 Invoice 13684 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-08-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $169.20 invoice 13704 4/8/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-12-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $10.80 Invoice 13711 4/12/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-15-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $81.00 Invoice 13731 4/15/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-19-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $12.60 Invoice 13742 4/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-22-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $128.78 Invoice 14135 4/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-26-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $9.00 Invoice 14144 4/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-29-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $242.10 Invoice 14165 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $861.38 Refer 51104 MCCARVILLE, MICHAEL Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE WATER RESCUE CONFERENCE $436.34 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $436.34 Refer 51104 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEM Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 04-15-04 LUNCHEON $18.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5~4~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18.00 Refer 51104 MINNESOTA DEPT PUBLIC SAFET Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic WELL #3 HAZARD FEE $100.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic WELL #1 HAZARD FEE $100.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic WELL #7 HAZARD FEE $100.00 invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer 51104 MINNESOTA DEPT TRANSPORTAT Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs LOST LAKE/GREENWAY $590.04 Invoice PA000095411 4/12/2004 Transaction Date 4/28/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $590.04 Refer 51104 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training CLASS SD RENEWAL, SKINNER $23.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.00 Refer 51104 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals COLIFORM, MF - WATER $77.50 Invoice 208513 4/20/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.50 Refer 51104 MINNESOTA WESTS COLLEGE -1312- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 13 Payments Current Period: May 2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training ARSON AWARENESS SEMINAR $240.00 Invoice 00045797 4/26/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 51104 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 04-04 SALARIES $5,759.50 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-185 Fire-Maintenance Pay 04-04 MAINTENANCE $1,060.00 Invoice 051104 5/1112004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 04-04 DRILLS $1,596.00 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,417.50 Refer 51104 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 05-04 FIRE RELIEF $9,641.67 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/612004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,641.67 Refer 51104 NADEAU, THOMAS Cash Payment G 101-22970 4852 Lanark,#03-49 minor su REFUND ESCROW DEPOSIT $742.50 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 4/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $742.50 ~"'~'~ ~ ~~ DOCK LABELS $203.19 Invoice 40511 4/22/2004 PO 18201 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $203.19 Refer 51104 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $145.00 Invoice 25663 4/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $423.00 Invoice 25710 4/28/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $568.00 Refer 51104 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISC FOR SIGNS $2,823.87 Invoice TI-0121810 4/22/2004 PO 18285 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,823.87 Refer 51104 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (FIRE Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 CELL PHONES $75.44 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $75.44 Refer 51104 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PAR Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 886763315-029 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Ceils voice 886763315-029 4/23/2004 ~,..~,.;ash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 886763315-029 4/23/2004 03-19-04 THRU 04-19-04 612-221-6740 BERENT,BRiAN $37.34 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 612-221-6794 TAFFE,JOHN $15.87 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 612-221-6812 FACKERL,JIM $87.73 -1313- CITY OF MOUND Cash Paymen[ E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 886763315-029 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 886763315-029 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 886763315-029 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 886763315-029 4/23/2004 Transaction Date 4/23/2004 City of Mound Payments 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 14 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 612~221-6813 $36.78 HOFF,KATIE 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 612-221-8385 SWARTER,BRIAN $40.35 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 612-282-5889 SIMONEAU,MATT $71.55 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 612-363-5883 NORLANDER,JILL $32.82 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $322.44 Refer 51104 NORTH MEMORIAL EDUCATION Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference'& Training FIRST RESPONDER,SUSSMAN $80.00 Invoice 2311 4/22/2004 PO 18346 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 51104 PARSONS ELECTRIC Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings RUN DATA WIRES $228.24 Invoice 66874 4/29/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $228.24 Refer 51104 PA USTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $170.50 Invoice 8033872 4/20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $19.95 Invoice 8034387 4/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $329.00 Invoice 8034213 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,998.31 Invoice 8034386 4/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,584.97 Invoice 8035141 4/20/2004 Transaction Date 4/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,102.73 Refer 51104 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $116.00 Invoice 59531555 4/2812004 Transaction Date 4/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $116.00 Refer 51104 PETZ, ZACHORY Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous REIMBURSE FORMS CABINET $119.64 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $119.64 Refer 51104 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $263.15 Invoice 2062740 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $720.70 Invoice 2062741 4/2112004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $162.06 Invoice 2065183 4/21/2004 -1314- City of Mound 05/06104 3:45 PM ~"~ ...... Page 15 Payments CITY OF IV]OUND Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For R~sale Invoice 2065184 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $34.75 Invoice 2065185 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,438.66 Refer 51104 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $746.65 Invoice 39763 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 4/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $746.65 Refer 51104 PLUNKETT'S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic APR,MAY,JUNE PEST CONTROL $95.84 invoice 253346 5/1/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.84 Refer 51104 PROTECTION ONE Cash Payment E 101-41910.440 Other Contractual Servic 05-01-04 THRU 07-3%04 MONITORING $142.80 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.80 Refer 51106 QUALITY REFRIGERATION, INCOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-415 Other Equipment Rental 04-14-04 SERVICE CALL $316.80 ~nvoice 12569 4/14/2004 ~ransaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $316.80 Refer 51104 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,677.63 invoice 395004-00 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $499.95 Invoice 395551-00 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,724.94 Invoice 395213-00 4121/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $962.59 Invoice 397283-00 4/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,436.10 Invoice 397849-00 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,301.21 Refer 51104 ROGERS, RICHARD Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE SEARCH/RESCUE $61.66 CONFERENCE Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.66 Refer 51104 SENTRY SYSTEMS, INCORPORAT Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-04 FIRE MONITORING $25.72 Invoice 378128 5/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750.440 Other Contractual Servic 05-04 FIRE ALARM TEST/INSPECTION $10.65 Invoice 378128 5/1/2004 C ash Payment E 609-49750.440 Other Contractual Servic 05-04 BURGLARY SYSTEM $22.21 voice 380034 5/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-04 O/C'S NO REPORTS $10.65 Invoice 380034 5/1/2004 Current Period: May 2004 WINE $1,258.00 -1315- City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM / ,,~ Payments _/ ~ CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Transaction Date E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-23-04 SERVICE CALL $123.90 4/23/2004 4/26/2004 Wells Fa rgo 10100 Total $193.13 Refer 51104 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVlCE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 3011 HIGHLAND RD $346.13 Invoice 4980 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 5001 HERON $905.25 Invoice 4979 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 3013 BRYANT STREET $852.00 Invoice 4981 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2.103.38 Refer 51104 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I Cash Payment E 496-4:6580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $320.55 invoice 0113827 4/15/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $320.55 Refer 51104 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER COMP Cash Payment E 101-41910-430 Miscellaneous DUCT SENSOR HOUSING $813,89 Invoice 12639648 4/16/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $813.89 Refer 51104 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs $88.93 Invoice 65353 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies $85.95 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-210 Operating Supplies $85.95 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies $85.95 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash. Payment E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies $85.95 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies $85.95 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies $28.65 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies $28.65 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies $42.99 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies $42.98 Invoice 65332 4/29/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $661.95 Refer 51104 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (FIR _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 04-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $490.02 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $490.02 Refer 51104 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (P/W MAILER CTYRD15 REALIGNMENT PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS PURCHASE ORDERS -1316- C) CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Cash Payment Invoice 051104 Transaction Date City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 17 Payments Current Period: May 2004 Total THRU 04-23-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 04-23-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 04-23-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 04-23-04 GASOLINE CHARGES Wells Fargo 10100 E 101.45200-212 Motor Fuels 5/11/2004 E 101.43100-212 Motor Fuels 5/11/2004 E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels 5/11/2004 E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels 5/11/2004 4/29/2004 $169.91 $828.38 $578.96 $315.62 $1,892.87 $24.23 $6.06 $5.O7 $2O.48 THRU 04-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 04-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 04-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 04-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 04-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES Refer 51104 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR Cash Payment E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101.42400-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels $425.49 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 rransactionDate 4/30/2004 Wells Total Fargo 10100 $481,33 Gash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ELGIN PELICAN SWEEPER REPAIR $530.12 invoice 8481-B 3/23/2004 Gash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ELGIN PELICAN REPAIRS $486.02 Invoice 5497 412712004 Gash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR LEAK SWEEPER $137.00 Invoice 5494 312312004 Transaction Date 4/2712004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,153.14 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Refer 51104 Cash Payment E 609.49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $250.00 Invoice 332102 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $242.00 Invoice 31972 4/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale BEER $627.75 Invoice 331784 4/26~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $150.00 Invoice 331794 4/22/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $63.55 Invoice 332440 4/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,671.60 Invoice 332441 4/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $377.00 Invoice 32075 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $557.20 O voice 332444 4/23/2004 ash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $70.70 Invoice 333155 4/23/2004 -1317- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 333156 4/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609~49750-252 Beer For Resale invoice 327468-B 4/23/2004 Transaction Date 4/2712004 City of Mound Payments 05~06~04 3:45 PM Page 18 Current Period: May 2004 BEER $3.328.65 BEER $3,50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,341.95 Refer 51104 THRIFTY WHITE DRUG STORE Cash Payment E 222.42260-210 Operating Supplies PHOTO PROCESSING $8.76 Invoice 682014 4119/2004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8.76 Refer 51104 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $91.74 Invoice 300249 4/16/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $91.74 Refer 51104 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REGISTER PAPER ROLLS $143.76 Invoice 16662 4/28/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $143.76 Refer 51104 TRUE VALUE, MOUND Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $37.74 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply $30.60 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply $191.76 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials $26.84 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material $108.60 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment. E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies $15.18 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials $177.53 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 RepaidMaint Supply $3.94 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply $9.97 InVoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials $21.99 Invoice 051104 5/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies $6.35 Invoice 051104 5/1112004 Transaction Date 5/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.50 Refer 51104 TWO RIVER SIGN AND DESIGN Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA DOOR SIGNS $147.01 Invoice 1050 4/29/2004 Transaction Date 5/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $147.01 Refer 51104 UHL COMPANY 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES -1318- CITY OF I~OUND City of Mound 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 19 Payments Current Period: May 2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings AHU REPAIRS $1,102.49 Invoice 115458 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/28/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,102.49 Refer 51104 UNIFORMS LIMITED Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves RESERVE SHIRTS $257.48 Invoice 218980 4/12/2004 PO 18174 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves STREETGEAR,SCHWALBE $61.90 Invoice 197490-B 4/12/2004 PO 17874 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies SHIRTS $98.85 Invoice 220755 4/12/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $418.23 Refer 51104 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 1970 LAKESIDE LANE $1,217.00 Invoice 522 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 04-01-04 BARTLETT REPAIR $1,378.00 Invoice 498 4/27/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-28-04 HIGHLANDS REPAIR $1,092.00 Invoice 499 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 5/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,687.00 C Refer 51104 WINE COMPANY %ash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,044.54 Invoice 268258-00 4/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $244.05 Invoice 27223-00 4/28/2004 Transaction Date 4/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,288.59 Refer 51104 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,360.00 invoice 94870 4/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,360.00 Refer 51104 WORLD CLASS WINES, INCORPO Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $453.00 Invoice 149479 4/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $269.00 Invoice 149732 4/28/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $722,00 Refer 51104 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities 04-04 #0895-951-498-118 $834.42 Invoice 0895-951-498-11 4/27/2004 Transaction Date 5/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $834.42 -1319- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summan/ 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND City of Mound Payments 05/06/04 3:45 PM Page 20 10100 Wells Fargo $62,897.30 $16,531.51 $250.47 $125,855.86 $2,322.09 $5,585.55 $6,338.85 $1,225.93 $76,556.78 $8,326.48 $2,403.53 $9,641.67 $317,936.02 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $317,936.02 $317,936.02 - 1320- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. 01-2004 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 903 TO CHAPTER IX OF THE CITY CODE PROHIBITING FISHING AT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE LOST LAKE CHANNEL The City of Mound does ordain'. The following new Section hereby added to Chapter IX. Section 903 - REGULATION OF FISHING AT LOST LAKE CHANNEL 903.00 Finding and Determination. Due to inherent risk of injury to persons engaged in boating and pedestrian activities within the relatively confined and congested areas of the Lost Lake Channel, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to, in the interest of public'heath, safety and welfare, to prohibit fishing at certain portions of the Lost Lake Channel. 903.05 Fishinq Re_clulation. No fishing is allowed from any public dock, pier, or other city regulated or owned structure or on any city lands at the Lost Lake Channel lying North of the Bartlett Bridge. The term fishing shall include fishing with a line, taking fish by means of snagging, spearing, harpooning, archery or by dip net. 903~.10 Si_ans to be Posted. Signs shall be posted at suitable locations along the Lost Lake Channel informing the public of the prohibition contained in Subsection 903.05. Passed by the City Council this m day of ,2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel Published in The Laker on the m day of Effective the __ day of ., 2004. ,2004. -1321 - CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com May 5, 2004 TO: FROM: RE: Mayor and City Council Bonnie Ritter Permits for Mound Fire Department Fish Fry The following permits are required for the June 5, 2004 Annual Fish Fry (request to waive fees): Public Dance Permit Temporary On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Permit Temporary Set-up License (Consumption & Display) _printed on recycled paper 1322- Engineering · Planning "' Surveying May 5, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Lost Lake Greenway S.P. 145-090-01 TEAX 2700 (28) Partial Payment MFRA #13566 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Environmental Associates Payment Request No. 5 for work completed through April 30, 2004 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $121,724.83. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Enclosure s:kmain:kmou 13566\correspondence\part-payS-5 - 1323- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com -1324- C ^~ B o o ..... bobbbobbobbobbbbbobbbbbbbobbobbbbbobbbbbbbboboobO 8888008888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 oo88§8~8~o88~8§8~o888§~o§o8oo~8~8~o8§o § oooooooooooooooooooo 88888888888888888888888~888888888888888~88888888 -- oo~ooooooooooo~ooooooooooooo88~o~g~oo~8oO88o - ~O00bObOObObOOOOb~bO~OObbOObObOb~O~b~O~Ob~oob~8 bboboObbobobobbbbbbo~bb~oobbbbo~mbooboobb~oaboo 008 ........... 8 ..... §oo~ooo~8ooo~o8 ....... 88888888888888888888888~8888888~°88888~8~°°8°°8ooo~oo oo - 1325- mm~ z C 888 ~ ~ 8 88 8 8 888 8 8 ~ 888888888888888888888888 8~ 8 8 ~ ~8 g ~ ~88 8 8 ~ 888888888888888888888888 8~ ~ ~ x x8 ~ ~ ~88 8 8 ~ 888888888888888888888888 -1326- 'o0 m.~>~ -1327- 8 88 ~ ~< mz mO .o -1328- P -1329- oooooopoooooooooooo~§o ~ - oo~o ~oo ooooo~ooooooooooooo~omo~ooo m -1330- mmmmm ........ ~ -1331 - . m -n -1332- ~8 "o0 mz ~z -1333- o mz zm mo -1334- 888888oo888888888~o888888888888888888888~88888888oooo -. - ................................. ~o~o'~o° ..... 88888888888888888888888oo888888888888888~88888888 oo~ooooooooooo~ooooooooooooo~8~o~o~ooo~ ~ ~ ~ ~- - ~ ~- - _ 888888888888~8888~88888888888888~88888888~888888 080000000 po8ooooo§oo~8o ....... 88ooo~o§ ....... 8~o8D~ 888888o~o888o8o8~888o88 -1335- ~ZCm~mmm~mmm 0 ~ o o ooo~oooooooooooooooo~-- ..............~o 888 008 8 8 o ..... 0m mm -1336- mooCC::m ~ ~ mm~ zz~ o ~-~ o ~' ~ · > ~ 888 8 88 888 8 ~ ~ ~~=~ ~= =~~ ,m ~ 8~ ~ ~ ~ ~8 8 8 888 ~ ~ m~ ~r Z ~>~. zz~z P -1337- z ~. m° ~8 0 I 88 -1338- A PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The annual distribution of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States has been officially recognized and endorsed by governmental leaders since 1922, and WHEREAS: VFW Buddy Poppies are asSembled by disabled veterans, and the proceeds of this worthy fund-raising campaign are used exclusively for the benefit of disabled and needy veter- ans, and the widows and orphans of deceased veterans, and WHEREAS: The basic purpose of the annual distribution of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars is eloquently reflected in the desire to "Honor the Dead by Helping the Living", there- fore , Mayor of the city of do hereby urge the citizens of this community to recognize the merits of this cause by contributing generously to its support through 'your donations for Buddy Poppies on the day set aside for the distribution of these symbols of'appreciation for the sacrifices of our honored dead. I urge all patriotic citizens to wear a Buddy Poppy as mute evidence of our gratitude to the men and women of this country who have risked their lives in defense of the freedoms which we continue to enjoy as American citizens. Signed E'I Mayor Attested City Clerk - 1339- THE HISTORY OF THE BUDDY POPPY The Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States was the first veteran organization to promote a nationally organized campaign for the annual distribution of Poppies assembled by disabled and needy veterans. The Poppy_ movement was inspired by the poem, "In Flanders Fields" written by Colonel John McCrae of the Canadian, forces before the United States entered World War I. Distributing replicas of the original Flanders Poppy originated in some of the allied countries immediately after the Armistice. No definite organized distribution of Poppi,es on a natiOnwide scale was conducted in America until 1921, when the Franco-American Children s League distributed Poppies ostensibly for the benefit of children in the devastated areas of France and Belgium. o Madam Guerin, who was recognized as "the Poppy lady from France", sought and received the cOoperation of the Veterans' of Foreign Wars of tl~e U.S. early in 1922, after the Franco-American Children s League was dissolved. The VFW conducted a Poppy campaign prior to Memorial Day 1922, using, only Poppies that were made in France. In the 1923 Poppy campaign, due to the difficulty and delay in getting Poppies from France, the VFW made use of a surplus of French Poppies that were on hand and the Balance was provided by a firm in New York city manufacturing artificial flowers. It was during the 1923 campaign that the VFW evolved the idea which resulted i.n the VFW Buddy Poppy fashioned by disabledand needy veterans who were paid for their work as a practical means of providing assistance for these Comrades. This plan was formally presented for adoptiOn to the 1923 encampment of the VFW at Norfolk, Virginia. Immediately t~ereafter the VFW Buddy Poppy factory was established in Pittsburgh, Penn~ylvania~ where all VFW Buddy Poppies for the 1924 campaig,n were assembled by disabled veterans. General Frank T. Hines, Director of the U.S. Veterans Bureau, endorsed the plan and pledged the cooperation of his department. All men employed in the assembling of the Bud,dY Poppies for the 1924 campaign were sent to the VFW Poppy worksh,,op, by the U.S. Veterans Bureau regional manager in Pittsburgh. The designation "Budcly Poppy which originated with the men themselVes, was adopted, at that time. IN FEBRUARY 1924, THE VFW REGISTERED THE NAME "BUDDY POPPY" WITH THE UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE, AND A CERTIFICATE WAS ISSUED ON MAY 20,1924, GRANTING THE VFW ALL TRADEMARK RIGHTS IN THE NAME OF "BUDDY" UNDER THE CLASSIFICATION OF ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS. The VFW has made that trademark a guarantee that all Poppies bearing that name and the.VFW label are genuine products of the work of disabled andneedy veterans. No other organization, firm or individual can make legal use of the name "BUDDY" POPPY. Following the 1924 campaign, a number of the larger Departments (States) of the VFW believed it would stimulate local distribution if the Poppies they used were assembled by disabled veterans in hospitals within their own jurisdiction. The 1924 encampment of the VFW at Atlantic City granted this privilege, under the provision that all Poppies would be produced according to specifications set forth by the National Buddy Poppy Committee, and that all Poppies would be assembled by disabled veteran's in government hospitals and by needy veterans in workshops supervised by the VFW. The National Buddy Poppy Committee has maintained a close check on the making of Buddy Poppies and has supplied VFW Buddy Poppy labels which must be used on all poppies distributed by any unit of this organization. The VFW has steadfastly adhered to the policy of veteran assembled Poppies. - 1340- The VFW organized the first nationwide distribution of Poppies ever conducted by a veterans organization in May 1922. Immediately thereafter, the Poppy was adopted by the National Encampment held in Seattle, Washington, during August of that year as the official memorial floWer of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States. In September 1920, the National Convention of the American Legion held at Cleveland, passed a resolution adopting the Poppy as the official flower of that organization. However, at the third Nati0.nal Convention of the American Legion held i.n Kansas City in October 1921, the American Leg~on repudiated the Poppy and adopted the daisy as its official flower. In October 1922, following the first nationwide distribution of Poppies conducted by the VFW during the month of May of that year, the fourth National Convention of the American Legion held at New Orleans, Louisiana, in October, adopted the following resolution which is taken from a printed summary of the proceedings: "Resolved, that the Poppy is hereby declared to be the official American Legion flower, instead of the daisy, which was adopted by the 1921 convention of the American Leg on . This indicates the daisy was adopted by the American Legion in 1921 and following the successful Poppy campaign conducted by the VFW in May 1922, the American Legion realized the financial possibilities of the Poppy movement. In the spring of 1923, following 'the New Orleans encampment and one year after the first Poppy campaign of the VFW on a nationwide scale, the American Legion .conducted its first Poppy sale using Poppies supplied by a French manufacturer as shown in the report of the National Adjutant for the-year ending October 15, 1923. The records are clear, however, on the subject of the first nationwide distribution of Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S. in May 1922. From the very beginning, the Buddy Poppy project of the VFW has received the endorsement and cooperation of the Director of the Veterans Ac~ministration, and. the support of..administrators and medical officers of government hospitals. All Presidents since 'Warren G. Harding (1921-1923) have conveyed to the nation at large, endorsement and recognition of this VFW effort. Today, VFW Buddy Poppies are assembled by disabled, needy, and aging veterans in VA Hospitals, State Veterans Homes and Domiciliaries across the country. The majority of proceeds derived from each campaign conducted by VFW Posts and their Ladies Auxiliaries is retained locally to provide for veteran services and welfare. The minimal assessment (cost of BUddy PoppieS) to VFW units provides compensation to the veterans who assembled the Poppies, provides finanCial assistance in maintaining state and national veterans' rehabilitation and service programs, and partially supports the VFW National Home for orphans and widows of our nation's veterans. Buddy Poppy proceeds represent no profit to any VFW unit. All the money contributed by the public for Buddy Poppies is used in the cause of veterans welfare, or for the well-being of their needy dependents and the orphans of veterans. -1341 - CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www,cityofmound,com May 5, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM' Bonnie Ritter RE: Public Gathering Permit Please consider a public gathering permit application received by Fishers of Men, to use Mound Bay Park for a picnic on June 16, 2004, from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. City Staff has approved application, and fee has been received. _printed on recycled paper 1342- Tuesday, April 27, 2004 10:12 AM Dick Swenson 763-476-5917 CITY OF MOUND $341 M~'X'WOOD RO.,tD MOUND~ MINI~$OTA 55364 Use ora publi~ park or com.,n~as b~ a~ ~'oup co~i~ ofl~ or mor~ indi~tdl~ab, Us~ is ~,o~ to in£~f~re,with traffic s,.d g~aeral use of the park or ~'ommons or to b~ bcyand d~ ability of the police ia maia~alniu~ order. Groap is r~ remove all litter ~ ~rash and provide a deposi: r~ imure cle, aai~lt ~ of the park ar~a. Tirr~ Frame ~ -~ dcJ -'~'~,, Bxp~t~l Att~ds~cc I ~'_~1 C~ , p.02 - 1343- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com May 5, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bonnie Ritter RE: Tree Removal & Treatment License Please consider a Tree Removal & Treatment License application received from Pro Tree Service, Little Falls, MN. Appropriate forms, fee and certificates of insurance have been submitted. _printed on recycled paper 1344- MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. gill TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: May 6, 2004 SUBJECT: PC Case #04-08 1749 Bluebird Lane Variance - Jeffrey L. Hanratty This is a fairly straight forward rear yard variance request to replace a lakeside porch and deck. The proposed porch would be built at the same setback as the existing porch. A lakeside deck is also part of the project but would not require a variance as it conforms with rear yard setbacks for decks at 10 feet and the 6 feet side yard setback adjacent to Wiota Commons. Resolution #94-71 granted a similar variance for the construction of the existing porch. It should be noted that there are some minor discrepancies between the 1990 and current survey. The 1990 survey indicates the outermost corner of the house has a 9.1 feet setback. The current survey shows an 8.6 feet setback for the existing porch which appears to be further from the west lot line than the house corner. Survey discrepancies are not uncommon. Typically, the most current survey is used when this occurs unless there is reason to believe it is inaccurate. Staff would recommend the current survey be used to establish the porch setbacks. Planning Commission unanimously approved the request consistent with Staff's recommendation for approval with the condition that the lakeside deck be constructed in a conforming location. A Resolution for approval with supportive finings is included for City Council adoption. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -1345- RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION APPROVING REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORCH ON THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1749 BLUEBIRD LANE, LOTS '13 AND '14, BLOCK 9, DREAMWOOD PID # 13-117-24-24-0005 P & Z CASE #04-08 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jeffrey L. Hanratty, has submitted an application for a rear yard variance to construct a porch addition to existing house at 1749 Bluebird Lane. The associated variances identified are as follows: Proposed Required Variance Rear yard 8.6 feet 15 feet 6.4 feet ; and WHEREAS, the property is located within an R-lA Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires a minimum of 6000 square feet of lot area, 40 feet of street frontage, a 20 feet front yard setback, 15 feet rear yard setback and 6 feet side yards for lots of record; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to remove the existing porch and deck and construct a larger porch maintaining the existing rear yard porch setback of 8.6 feet. A deck located lakeside of the porch would be constructed in conformance with side, rear and lakeside setbacks; and, WHEREAS, Resolution #90-50 granted variance approval of a 9.1 feet rear yard and 5 feet side yard setbacks to add a second story to the existing single story home; and, WHEREAS, Resolution #94-71 granted a variance for a 9.1 feet rear yard setback for the construction of the existing porch in 1994; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously recommended that the Council approve the rear yard variance as requested by the applicant. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the rear yard variance request with the following conditions: a. The City Engineer review grading and drainage issues at the time of building permit. - 1346- o b. 'Fhe applicant shall be responsible for the payment of all costs associated with the variance request. c. The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary building permits. d. The lakeside deck be constructed in a conforming location. The City Council adopts the following findings in support of the rear yard setback variances: a. The location of the house is an existing property condition not created by the applicant. b. The rear yard setback maintains the existing setback of the current house and porch. The placement of the proposed porch is a logical location for a lakeside porch, maintaining the setbacks and bulk of the existing porch. d. The proposed porch will not a increase the current level of nonconformity. e. The proposed porch will add to the livability of the house. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: LOTS '13 AND '14, BLOCK 9, DREAMWOOD This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: -1347- Adopted May 6, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -1348- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ,MAY 3, 2O04 C BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-08 VARIANCE DECK/PORCH CONSTRUCTION 1749 BLUEBIRD LANE- JEFF HANRATTY The applicant has submitted a variance request to remodel the existing deck and porch. The porch will be larger. The variance is needed because of the existing rear yard setback of 8.6 feet. Required setback is 15 feet. Findings in support of the variance request include: 1. The applicant did not create the existing pre©arty condition. 2. The rear yard setback maintains the exis'~etback of the current house 3. The placement of the proposed porch is ~,(~gical location, and porch. 4. The proposed porch will not increase t~rrent level of nonconformity. 5. The proposed porch will add to the ~,_,~ity of the house. Staff recommends approval of the v~ce with the following conditions: 1. The City Engineer review grading and drainage issues at the time of building permit application. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of all costs associated with the variance request. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary building permits. Discussion General discussion ensued regarding the existing and proposed conditions on the site. Jeffrey Hanratty (applicant) clarified a few issues on the site drawing. Ayaz made the point that he would like to see the deck reconstructed conforming. Staff responded by indicating the rear setback for a deck was 10 feet making the proposed deck conforming. Hanratty was confused about the Commission's comments. The original plan was to add on to the existing structure with the least amount of change. He would like to maximize the porch structure because of the weather constraints. - 1349- Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2004 MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Schwingler, to recommend Council approve the variance as proposed. Osmek amended the motion, seconded by Schwingler, to require any exterior open deck to be conforming in all respects. MOTION carried unanimously. -1350- 5341 Maywo0d Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and' Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 21, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance Request - Deck Replacement OWNER/APPLICANT: Eva Hasch (Representative: Greg Lunde) PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-10 LOCATION: 4804-4820 Northern Road PID: 13-117-24-44-0094 ZONING: R-3 Multiple Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: High Density Residential SUMMARY At its May 3, 2004 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance request from Greg Lunde of Annointed Carpentry (on behalf of Eva Hasch) to allow repair and replacement of an existing lakeside deck located at the 4-plex at 4804-4820 Northern Road. As a small portion of the deck (3' x 15' triangle) on the northwest side does not meet the required 50-foot lakeshore setback from the OHWM, the project required variance approval which is outlined as follows: Lake Setback PROJECT DETAILS Required ,Existin_~/Proposed Variance 50 feet 45 feet / 45 feet 5 feet Details regarding the project are outlined in Planning Report No. 04-10 (excluding attachments) which has been included. A full copy of the report is on file and will be provided upon request. -1351 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION if 04- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING DECK FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4804-4820 NORTHERN ROAD P & Z CASE if 04-11 PID if 13-1 '17-24-44-0094 WHEREAS, the applicant, Eva Hasch, has requested variance approval to allow repair and replacement of an existing lakeside deck at 4804-4820 Northern Road; and WHEREAS, the subject site includes an existing 4-plex and 2-unit addition that was constructed in 1988 and fronts Northern Road on the south side and includes lake frontage on the north side; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires a 50-foot lakeshore setback from 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) for Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, the requested variance is outlined as follows: Required, Existing I Proposed_ Variance Lakeshore Setback - (S) 50 feet 45 feet / 45 feet 5 feet and; - 1352- WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 530:530, Subd. 1 states that a variance may be issued to provide relief to a landowner where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his/her property if certain circumstances exist; and WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 3, 2004 meeting as required by the City Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance subject to the conditions recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, hardcover on the subject site is approximately 42 percent which is deemed to be an existing condition, however, so as to improve existing conditions, the applicant intends to modify the site to be within the 40 percent hardcover allowance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the requested variance and makes the following findings of fact: A. The existing 9 ft. x 50 ft deck is being replaced in its current location. B. The lakeshore frontage abutting the subject property is irregular. Co The majority of the existing deck is in a conforming location with the exception of a small portion (3' x 15' triangle) in the northwest corner. D. The original project approvals for the complex included the deck. Eo Development on the subject site predates the 1994 approval of the Shoreland Ordinance that enacted the 50-foot lakeshore setback as well as the 40 percent hardcover restriction. Cutting back the northwest corner of the deck to meet the 50-foot lakeshore setback requirement would hinder the functionality and/or use for the occupants in the western most unit. G. A deck is considered to be a standard feature for lots with lakeside views. -1353- H. The criteria for granting a variance as set forth in City Code Chapter 350:530 have been met. 2. This variance is approved subject to the following conditions: A. The lakeside deck shall be located in the same location and shall not encroach further into the lakeshore setback area. B. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. D. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. E. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. F. Application shall be subject to comments and recommended conditions from Staff. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: See Exhibit A This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S,S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This Shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). -1354- The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted May 11, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk C -1355- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 2004 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-10 VARIANCE DECK REPLACEMENT 4804 NORTHERN ROAD - EVA HASCH/GREG LUNDE The applicant, Greg Lunde of Annointed Carpentry, has requested a variance to repair and replace an existing deck. A small portion of the deck on the northwest side does not meet the required 50-foot lakeshore setback. The requested variance requested is 5 feet. Staff wishes to point out that the original construction approval occurred before the hardcover and 50-foot setback from the OHW,~mgulations were in place. Staff recommends approval of the propose~.~ariance subject to the following conditions: _ 1. The lakeside deck shall be Iocated,~ same location and shall not encroach further into the lakeshore setba~. 2. Applicant shall be responsible fo~ment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 4. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or ali permits. 6. Application shall be subject to comments and recommended conditions from City Staff. Discussion Greg Lunde, (Applicant) indicated that the gravel driveway could be pared back to reduce hardcover, if necessary. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Miller, to recommend Council approve the variance as recommended. MOTION carried unanimously. -1356- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 30, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance Request OWNER: Eva Hasch (Representative: Greg Lunde) CASE NUMBER: 04-10 LOCATION: 4804-4820 Northern Road PID: 13-117-24-44-0094 ZONING: R-3 Multiple Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: High Density Residential BACKGROUND Greg Lunde of Annointed Carpentry (on behalf of Eva Hasch) has submitted a variance application to repair and replace an existing deck located at the 4-plex at 4804 - 4820 Northern Road which is on the lakeside of the structure. As a small portion of the deck (3' x 15' triangle) on the northwest side does not meet the required 50-foot lakeshore setback from the 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), the proposed project requires variance approval which is described as follows: Reauired Lakeshore setback 50 feet Specific details regarding the project are elevation drawings, etc.) that have applicant's supplemental narrative. Existin.qlRe(luested Variance 45 feet / 45 feet 5 feet outlined in the submitted plans (ie. floor, been included as attachments as well as the BACKGROUND The subject property includes an existing 4-plex and a 2-unit addition that was constructed in 1988. The property fronts Northern Road on the south side and includes lake frontage on the north side. The applicant applied for a building permit to replace the existing lakeside deck in October 2003. The permit was not issued as a portion of the deck in the northwest corner does not meet 50-foot lakeshore setback requirement. -1357- At its March 1, 2004 meeting, the Planning Commission deemed the 2002 survey from Coffin & Gronberg to be acceptable for the purpose of variance review, Members of the Commission are advised that the survey, includes setback measurements from the rear of the structure(s) to the 929.40HW but does not include the lakeside deck. The applicant has included the location of the deck on the survey. The subject site was rezoned in July 2003 from B-2 General Business to R-3 Multiple Family Residential. Additionally, the property was reguided from Low Density Residential to High Density' Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. Multiple family structures are permitted uses in the R-3 zone. Under the previous B-2 zoning, multiple family structures were allowed by conditional use in the B-2 district. A copy of the resolution approving the CUP and variance(s) has been included as an attachment. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. 60-DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application was received and deemed t° be complete on April 6, 2004. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission.are advised that this activity was completed on April 30, 2004. AGENCY COMMENTS A copy of the application and supporting information were forwarded to all involved public agencies. LMCD Executive Director Greg Nybeck contacted Staff and indicated that he has no issues with the proposed variance request. As of this date, no other comments have been received.' -1358- C C~ DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Copies of the variance application were forwarded to all City departments for review. All written comments which were received are outlined below: Parks Department No comments. Engineering Department Application is complete. Additional details including, but not limited to, proposed elevations may be required as part of the building permit process. Public WOrkS Supt. No objections. Police Department No comments received. Fire Department No comments received. Building Inspections DISCUSSION Building permit required including submittal of all required information and payment of fees. Pre-construction site inspection required to verify setback(s) and deck location. Portions of the deck appear to be in a state of disrepair due to rotting joists and deck boards. 1. The existing deck is to be replaced in its current location. According to City Code Chapter 350:440, Subd. 3, lakeside decks must meet the 50-foot lakeshore requirement. According to the 2002 Coffin and Gronberg survey, the NW corner of the structure is (53) feet. As the deck extends (8) feet closer to the lake, the deck does not meet the 50-foot requirement. The applicant is requesting variance approval to allow a 45-foot setback to the OHWM. As the deck is located behind the rear building line, a side setback of (4) feet for the deck is required on the west side and is therefore compliant with the City Code. 4. Staircase structures can be located within (2) feet of any lot line. 5. The original project approvals for the complex included the deck. -1359- According to information provided by the applicant, hardcover on the subject site is approximately 42 percent and therefore exceeds the 40 percent allowance by (360) SF. Development on subject site pre-dates the 1994 approval of the Shoreland Ordinance that enacted the 50-foot lakeshore setback as well as impervious surface coverage regulations. Staff would encourage the Planning Commission to discuss with the applicant whether there are ways to bring the hardcover into compliance with the 40 percent restriction so as to improve the existing condition(s). 7. Cutting back the NW corner of the deck of the structure will hinder the functionality for the western most unit. 8. The lakeshore frontage abutting the subject property is irregular. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the proposed variance(s) to allow construction replacement of the existing deck at 4804-4820 Northern Road subject to the following conditions: 1. The lakeside deck shall be located in the same location and shall not encroach further into the lakeshore setback area. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. 4. Applicant shall be required to 'submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. 6. Application shall be subject to comments and recommended conditions from City Staff. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its May 3, 2004 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for review at its May 11, 2004 meeting. 4 -1360- 0 Z OL Zd Nd]:0:£0 £~0Z L~ '$o0 tt 20.00 $ C'5'39' 42" W 104.09 E)~STING DOCK C / / LAKE~,., MI~i. NE~ONKA 37,00 NORTHERN 'I .- W£$T l LANE C FON - NORTHERN RA-i~L, ROA P ~ Og I~URLIN~TON'_ - NORTN~R~ RAIL. ROAD,~. . . 5341 MayW0od Road Mound, MN 55364 ' (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and ,Staff FROM': Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: May 6, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance Request - Garage Addition ' OWNER ! APPLICANT: Allison Fish / Scott Frederickson PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-11 LOCATION: 4679 Hampton Road ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential coMpREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential SUMMARY At its May 3, 2004 meeting, the. Planning Commission reviewed the variance request from Allison Fish and Scott Frederickson to allow construction of a 2-stall garage.,.." addition to their home located at 4679 Hampton Road. The requested variance is outlined as follows: Required Proposed Variance Side setback - west 10 feet 9 feet 2 inches 10inches PROJECT DETAILS Details regarding the project are outlined in Planning Report No, 04-10 (excluding attachments) which has been included. A full copy of the report is. on file and will be provided upon request. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the variance request as recorn'mended by Staff, In particular, members of the Commission commented that the variance has been minimized as the request involves construction of a 2-car garage and the request is only for (10 inches). Details are contained .in the May 3, 2004 meeting minute excerpts which have been included as an attachment. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recemmendatien has also. been include.~.... ...... -1364~ CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN 10 INCH FOR A 2-CAR GARAGE ADDITION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4679 HAMPTON ROAD P & Z CASE # 04-t 0 P! D # rl 9'117'23'33'0185 WHEREAS, the appliCants, Allison Fish' and Scott Frederickson, have requested variance approval to allow construction of a 2-car garage addition located at 4679 Hampton Road; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires aten (10) foot and eight (8) foot side setbacks for principal structures in the R-1 Zoning District; and WHEREAS~ the requested variance.is outlined as follows: Required Proposed Variance Side setback - West 10 feet 9 feet, 2 inches 10 inChes and; WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 530:530, Subd. 1 states that a variance may be issued to provide relief to.a landowner Where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his/her property if certain circumstances exist; and WHEREAS, the property currently includes 'an existing single-family dwelling but does not include a garage; and -1365- WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to place the garage in a location wh ich is currently being used for outdoor parking purposes.; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the Planning Commission. at its May 3, 2004 meeting as required by the City Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance subject to the conditions recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of MoUnd, Minnesota as folloWs: 1. The City does'hereby approve the requested variance and makes the following findings Of fact: A. The subject site currently lacks a garage. The applicant proposes to place the garage in a location which is currently being used fOr outdoor parking purposes. Hardcover on the subject site is-within the.(40) percent: restriction. for '!lots of record." Do The addition of a 2-car garage addition is reasonable and the requested variance is only (:10) inches: Development on the subject site is limited on the north side due to the 30-foot front setback requirement and is also limited.on the= south side due to topography and is also not functional as the proposedlgarage has been designed tobe attached to the existing house. Additionally, Construction on the east side is not possible due to the existing setback of (8.75) feet. Th'e criteda for granting a variance as set forth in City Code Chapter 350:530 have been met. 2. This variance is approved sUbject to the following conditions:' A. Applicant shall be responsible, for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. - - 1366- C C No future apProva[,~bf ~any development Plans and/or building permits is included as. part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. C. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. D. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. 3. This variance is approved for the following legally described proPerty as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Lots 11 & 12, Block 9 PEMBROKE, City of Mound Hennepin County, Minnesota This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin. County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner Shall have the reSponsibilitY of filing this resolution with Hennep[n_CO~p_tY.and..paYing?r all cOs__ts for sucb~ ~Or.d_ing A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issUed until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350:530, Subd, 2 (E) The foregoing resolution was moved by CounCilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted May 11, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2004 CASE #4:)4-11 VARIANCE GARAGE ADDITION 4679 HAMPTON ROAD - ALLISON FISH/SCOTT FREDRICKSON The applicants have. requested a side setback variance to allow construction of a 2-car garage addition to the home. The reqUested vadance is 10 inches on the west side of the structure. The proposed addition is approximately 22' x 42'. The applicants are also planning to add a 16' x 6' patio below the existing deck that is located :in the SE corner of the house. Staff recommends approval of the variance subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs aSsOCiated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this. action in the event the variance application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to sUbmit all required information upon submittal of the 'building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. 5. Application shall be subject, to comments and recommended conditions from City Staff. MOTION by Miller, seconded by Ayaz, to recommend Council approve the variance. MOTION carried unanimously. -1368- 5341 MaYw0od~Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3t 90 PLANNING REPORT " TO: Mound COuncil, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, CommunitY Development Director DATE: April 30, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance Request OWNER: Allision Fish and Mark Hendrickson CASE NUMBER: 04-11 LOCATION: 4679 Hampton Road ZONING: R-1 Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND Allison Fish and Mark Hendrickson have submitted an application requesting'variance approval to allow construction of a 2-car garage addition on the west side of their home located at 4679 Hampton Road. The requested variance is described as follows: Required Requested Variance Side setback - west 10 feet 9 feet, 2 inches 10 inches Specific details regarding the project are outlined in the submitted plans (ie. floor, elevation drawings, etc.) that have been included as attachments as well as the applicant's supplemental narrative. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing rambler-style home was constructed in 1981. The house faces Hampton Road and also includes frontage on Paisley Road. Presently, the existing house is conforming with regard to setbacks as the east side setback is 8.75 feet (or 8 feet, 9 inches) and the west setback is 24 feet (+/-). The current proposal, as submitted would make the house nonconforming as a (10) foot 'setback on one side would not be maintained as the proposed garage addition would be located 9 feet, 2 inches from the west property line. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the subject site currently does not include a garage'. The proposed garage addition is approximately 22 x 42. As part of the proposal, the applicants are also planning to add a 16' x 16' patio below the existing deck which is located in the SE corner of the house. Setbacks for the pat o are consistent with the setback regulations and do not require variance approval. -1369- REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zon!ng Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. 60-DAY PROCESS' Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application was received and deemed to be complete on April 12, 2004. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that this activity was completed on April 30, 2004. · 'DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Copies of the variance applicatiOn were forWarded to all City departments for review. All written comments which were received are outlined below: Parks Department No objections Engineering Department Application is complete. Additional details including, but not limited to, proPosed elevations to' evaluate' drainage flow may be required as part of the building permit process. Public Works Supt. No objections. Police 'Department No police issues. Fire Department No concerns from Fire Department, Building InsPeCtions Building permit required including submittal of all required information. Pre-construCtion site inspection required to verify setbacks. -1370~ C DISCUSSION At its April 5, 2004 meeting, the Planning Commission deemed the survey dated August 23, 1995 from Jim Kyro & Associates, Inc, to be acceptable for the purpose of variance review as long as the property irons were exposed and the proposed garage addition was staked so members of the Planning Commission could clearly identify the proposed location. 2. The zoning for the subject pr, operty is R-1 Single Family Residential. The R-1 District regulations are identified below: Lot Area Width Depth Front Side Rear Setback(s) Setback setback R-1 10,000 SF 60 FT 80 FT 30 FT 8/10 FT*15 FT The standard side setback in the R-1 District is 10 feet. As the property located at 4679 Hampton Lane is a "lot of record" it is therefore eligible for a reduced setback of 8 feet on one side as allowed for properties between 80 and 100 feet in width. The subject property is' irregularly shaped in the northeast corner and slopes downward in the backyard toward Paisley Road. The location of the proposed garage addition is currently gravel and is used for parking purposes. 6. Hardcover is within the (40) percent restriction for lots of record. Construction of a garage addition on the east side is not possible due to the existing setback of 8.75 feet. Construction on the north side is also not possible due to the 30 foot 'front setback requirement. Construction on the south side is not logical as the garage has been designed to be attached to the existing house. Additionally, the topography behind the house drops off in the backyard and also accommodates surface drainage which is directed south towards Paisley Road. 8.' The building improvements will improve livability and provides for all-season protection of vehicles and equipment. 9. The addition of a 2-car garage with a 10-inch variance is reasonable. 10. The subject area has been marked with orange spray paint. - 1371 - RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City CounCil approval of the proposed variance(s) to allow construction of a garage addition at 4679 Hampton Lane subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request, 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to Submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits, 5. Application shall be subject to comments and recommended Conditions from City Staff. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW in the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its May 3, 2004 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for 'review at its MaY 11,2004 meeting. -1372- ,4¢~,-=: .¥ 6.579 Hampton RO~d Hi.ne~obn. 55364 .: Lo:s 11 & PEMBROKE, (Hty o( Mound,' Henneptn County, Minnesota. 'b Dbflotes Iron Monu,nent.~ spikes set on property ttne. .' ~,~:;~..'. ~ . ..~. . . . ~. .. ~:~ ~' .. ', . ~.~ ¢.: . /o/o i Q C / .5onK :~ti:.,. ,. Scale: L" --. D~ t,c- : ,",-"-79 o .: ]ro,h C IO m qo .~-1~75-.- _53~1_Ma.y~..o.od_Boad . .. Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: May 6, 2004 SUBJECT: Waiver of platting request APPLICANTS: Vincent Reis P. LANN.ING CASE NUMBER: 03~.-8. LOCATION: 5853 Fairfield Road PID: 23-117-24-42-0089 ZONING: R-2 Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY The City Council will review a request from Vincent Reis, for waiver of platting approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdiVide the property located at 5853 Fairfield Road as follows: Existinq Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6 Block 9, Minnesota 'Baptist Summer Assembly Proposed Lots 3 & 4, Lots 5 & 6 Block 9, Minnesota Baptist Summer Assembly Block 9, Minnesota Baptist Summer Assembly SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 330:12 states that any parcel of land, either platted or unplatted that has been combined for tax purposes or other reasons, cannot be re-separated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the platting requirements of the subdivision ordinance. A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City Council after receipt of the background information provided by Cit~ staff. The waiver of platting and release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be in compliance with all City codes. The City may impose conditions to the waiver. Applications for waiver of platting do not require review by the Planning Commission. However, if it so desires, the City Council may remand the application to the Planning Commission if it determines that their advice will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. ~ -1376- BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Conditions. The subject property located at 5853 Fairfield Road currently· 'includes four (4) platted lots and previously included a home which was demolished in ;>003 so as to allow construction of a new single-family dwelling on Lots 3 & 4 by the applicant. Certificate of Survey. An updated Certificate of Survey for the subject property, dated September 22, 2003 and revised on 9/29/03 and 3/26/04 respectively was prepared by RLK has been included as an attachment. Determination of Com_p_leten_.e_~_s_._.._T._h_~_a_p_pliCation was submitted on ~_pril 2 2004 and deemed to be complete. PUrsuant to M.S.S. 462.358 Subd. 3(b), th~-Cit-~-h-a-~-l~(~'L' days to approve or deny a subdiviSion application. ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map included in the Mound Comprehensive Plan guides the property fOr future Iow-density residential use (1-6 units / acre.) The Subject property is surrounded on all sides by residential use. Zoning. The subject property is zoned R-2 single family residential. The following table includes the I°t dimensionS, and setback requirements of the R-2 District. I LotArea Width Depth Frontage at Front Side Street.._ Setback Setback(s) R-2 6,000 SF 40 FT 80 FT 40 FT 20 FT '10 FT Both proposed new lots are consistent with the R-2 standards for lot area, width, depth and frontage, while construction is not contempJated as a part of the current waiver of platting recluest on Lots 5 & 6, the applicant has dem0nstra~ed a building pad on both lots which meet the requirements of the R-2 District for a "non,lot of record." Non,Lot of Record Status. In the event the waiver of platting request- is apProved, the subject property will lose its "lot of record" status and therefore will be sUbject to the standard provisions of the R:2 District. As previously mentioned, the side setback (principal structure) for non-.lots of record is, ten (10) feet. Additionally, hardcover is limited to no more than thirty (30) percent. Hardcover, as proposed, is 28 perCent for Lot 3 & 4 and 20 percent for Lots 5 & 6. - 1377- CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City · departments for-.-re,view and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: ..... Fire Chief Pederson No objections. Police Chief Kurtz No objections. Building Official A building permit will be required for any proposed neTM dwelling including the ..submittal .................. -0{ "~i~'~:~ ~-~'~-Tt~{6i:~h ~fb'fi""'~-fiTd' S~' '~~ ....... to all provisions of the Uniform Building Code as well as-local regulations. City Engineer Cameron Refer to conditions 4,5, & 6 from letter dated September 26, 2003 regarding subject property. Public Works Supt. Skinner No objections. Public Works Director Moore Refer to memorandum dated May 5, 2004 NOTIFICATION While City Code does not require public notification, current City policy indicates that adjacent property owners are notified as a oourtesy. Members of the Planning Commission and City Council are advised that notification regarding the request was forwarded to the adjacent property owners on or around May 7, 2004. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS · 1. ApPrOval of the proposed waiver of platting dOes not Constitute or guarantee futUre approval Of anY bUilding permit(s) Or any other necessary, approval by any other'public agency. RECOMMENDATION Waiver of Platting. Staff recommends City CounCil approval of the waiver of platting application for the property located at 5853 Fairfield Road sUbject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with City review of the waiver, request. -1378- C No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit applications, when appropriate. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 5. All conditions from the Public Works Director and Oity Engineer. 6. If the resolution'is released prior tO,the installation of municipal utilities and other related work (if applicable), a utility escrow dePosit or other acceptable financial guarantee (i.e. letter of credit) in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer shall be submitted. One (1) park dedication fee in the amount of $1100.00 shall be Paid purSuant to CitY Oode. Chapter 330;12.0, Subd. 3 prior to the release of the reSelution. The drainage and utility easements shall be included on a revised survey to be provided by the applicant and also provided in document form so as to allow for recording at Hennepin County. -1379- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE REQUEST FROM VINCENT REIS FOR WAIVER OF PLATTING APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE LOTS :3, 4, $, & 6, BLOCK 9, MINNESOTA BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INTO TWO (2) LOTS PID #23-117-24-42-0089 WHEREAS, the applicant,'Vincent Reis, has submitted a request for waiver ofplatting approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 3, 4, 5, &' 6, Minnesota Baptist Assembly into two (2) buildable lots; WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 5853 Fairfield Road; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-2 and single-family residential is a permitted use; and WHEREAS, LOts 3, .4, 5, & 6, Block 9, Minnesota Baptist Assembly, are platted lots and were combined previously for tax-purposes by a former owner; and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots, Lots 3 & 4 and Lots 5 & 6 meet the lot size, width, depth and frontage requirements of the R-2 District; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 330:12 states that a waiver of the platting request may be granted by the City Council if it is determined that the proposal is in compliance with all City codes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the waiver of platting request which shall be subject to the following conditions: -1380- do go Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs assOciated With City review of'the waiver request. .N.o: future approval of andy devel.epmentplans .andlor. bu.ildi~g ..... permits is included as part of this land use action in the event the waiver of platting request is approved. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information Upon submittal of the building permit aPplications, when appropriate. At~plicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all p~b'i'iC a~'e'~;' pe'rm'it~"inci'u~i'i'~ig'~he s~bm'i'~tal of aiJ r~i'~':i~-~'~i ...... information prior to building permit issuance. Recommended conditions from the City Engineer from his letter dated September 26, 2003 as follows: Verification by Greg Skinner how the property will be served by both sewer and water. The only service shown is the sewer service to Lot 3. The City's record plans show another sewer service'to Lot 6. Water information was not available. One sanitary sewer and one watermain trunk charge will need to be Collected, either on this permit or when application is made to build on Lots 5 and 6. Applicant shall dedicate the standard drainage and utility easements is part of the waiver of platting request which includes ten (10) foot easements both along the front and rear and five (5) feet on all side lot lines. If the resolution is released prior to the installation of municipal utilities and other related work (if applicable), a utility escrow deposit or other acceptable financial guarantee (ie. letter of credit, cash deposit, etc.) in an amount to be determined and approved by the City Engineer shall be submitted. The standard amount is 125% of an contractor o~ engineer estimate. One (1) park dedication fee in the amount of $1100.00 shall be paid pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:120, Subd. 3 prior to the release of the resolution. -1381 - - 2. This waiver of platting request is hereby approved for the following described property: .. -": EXi-~{in~i .................... . Lots 3, 4, 5, & 6 Block 9, Minnesota BaPtist Summer Assembly Pr°pose,d,, Lots 3'& 4, Lots 5 & 6 Block 9, Minnesota Baptist Summer Assembly Block 9, Minnesota Baptist Summer Assembly ........................ The. ~o.reg. oi ~)g....!;e s.o.l uti.o..n....~s..moved .. by .. Co.u nci!.member seconded by Councilmember and The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following CoUncilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted May 11, 2004 Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk - 1382- ~_ LAT " .......................o,~. o~ ~,o..~ -._ IVE.R.OF..P_ TING PAiD ~ ~.r%~.~o.~,¢~r~ ~.,~.V~l,~''~' "' APPLICATION . ~T ~ ~ zoo3 ~-- .ho~ ~2-~ -0~00~2~72.0~20 ~ · ~ ~ Appl~0 EscrowDeposit:$200.00 Ci~CouncilDat~~n~ Case ~ ~~ INFO' Subject Address. 5~' ~ 5 ~ ,. 0' ~ t¢ O/¢~t. ~:~ LEGALEXISTING Lot(s). 3, ~ .~¢ Block q S,bdivisio~~~, DESCRIPTION PID¢ Plat ¢ PROPOSED A. Lot(s) , LEGAL ~ _ Block ZONING Circle: R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 DISTRICT PROPER~ Are there existing structures on the prope~? ~ / no Do the existing stru~ures comply with the zoning ordinance for setbacks, hardcover, etc ?~/ no APPLICANT The applicant is: ~owner. other: , , OWNER Name (if other than .applicant) Address Phone (H), (W) (M) C Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, (~-no. if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. certify that ail of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or pi&ns to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs Incurred by the 0ity related to the processing of this application consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in th~s application by any ~"~authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be ~ ~quired by law. Applicant Signm.re ~- Dine /cd//~ !/~ 3 / 'x Il Il I{ \ 0 n" g~ W~-~ I { ~=" -- 1384- C M E M 0 R A ND .UM DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2003 · FRA TO: MATT SIMONEAU, BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: 5853 FAIRFIELD ROAD LOTS 3 AND 4 BLK. 9,. MN. BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY SURVEY REVIEW MFRA File No. 8901 C As requested, we have reviewed the survey submitted with the. building permit application for subject property and have the following comments: 1. Need silt fence along the south and east property lines. 2. Final grading must insure that rear yard drainage is directed towards the southeast comer of the property. 3. The existing cub will need to be removed for the new driveway and a concrete apron installed. Verify with Greg Skirmer how this property will be served by both seWer and water. The only service shown is the sewer service to Lot 3. The City's, record plans show another sewer service to Lot 6. I do not have anything on the water services. o o One sanitary sewer and one watermain trunk charge will need to be collected, either on this permit, or when application is made to build on Lots 5 and 6. Sarah, what about easements ? I Would like to see our normal ones required when this property goes through Wavier of Platting. Ten (10) feet wide along both the front and rear lot lines and five (5) feet on all side lot lines. C CC: Jill Norlander Sarah Smith '15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 -1385- JCAMERON@MFRA.COM (763)476-6010 FAX (763) 476-8532 5341 Ma~ood Road Sarah Smith, Community Developmerrt Dirc:~'tor Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works / EngineeriBg Coordinator May 5, 2004 Vincent Reis. 5853 Fairfield Avenue, waiver of platting, r:eview of survey. MEM( To: From: Date: Subject: At your request I have rewewed the survey dated April 2, 2004 submitted with the reqUest-for waiver.of platting by Vincent Reis for 5853 Fairfield Av.enue and have the following comments: 1. The drainage and utility easements need to be show,.??n the survey. 2. Legal descriptions for the drainage and utility easements need to written and submitted with the revised survey. -1386- C Harbor Wine & Spirits. Gala Wine Event Total Expenses: Burl Oaks: $3195.00 (Charge for 141 Guests) Laker/Pioneer Ad: $286.50 Mound Post Office: $1881.58 (Postage for Direct Mailers) SOS Printing:. $1167.08 (Mailers, Ticket Printing, and Silent Auction Bid Sheets) Lakeshore Weekly Ad: $199.50 Grand Total: $6729.66 C; Revenue: Tickets Sold: $4305.00 (103 tickets sold) Silent Auction: $1408.00 Net Wine Sales.-' $3656,00 (Gross after Cost of Goods) C~rand Total: $9369.00 Grand Total Revenue $9369.00 Minus Grand Total Expenses $6729.66 $2639.34 - 1387- AR Sale Report Harbor Wine & Spirits AR Acct # Name ;. ~ .. MtD PurchasesYtD Purchases · , 0.00 1.08 · -' 0.00 66.71 .............. ..... ..... 224.28 "~4~28 Total 23 296,33 146,94 76,02 58,14 104,51 352.83 124,02 65,90 101.78 72,76 264.17 438,90 831.36 0,00 63,96 666,03 577.24 1090.03 ". / PY Purchases YtD Pay SPY Pay Dollars 100,00 0,00 100,00 0,00 1,08 0,00 0,00 68,13 0,00 0100 224.28 01% 296.33 0.00 296.33 0.00 146.94 0.00 146.94 0.00 76.02 0.00 76.02 0.00 58.14 0,00 58.14 0.00 I04.51 0,00 104,51 0,00 352,83 0,00 352,83 0,00 124,02. 0,00 124,02 0,00 65,90 0,00 65,90 0,00 101,78 0,00 101,78 0,00 56,64 0,00 56.64 0~00 72.76 0.00 72.76 0,00 264.17 0.00 264.17 0.00 ~438.90 0.00 438.90 0.00 831.36 '0.00 831.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63,96 0,00 63,96 0,00 666,03 0,00 666,03 0,00 577,24 0.00 577.24 0,00 1090,03 0,00 1090,03 0,00 5679.63 t00.00 5681.05 100.00 4/23/2004 8:00:02 AM Page 1 YtD Fin PY ~' 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 .0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (' 0.00 0,0u 0.00 0,00 - 1388- 5341 Maywood Road C Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 To: From Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Carlton Moore / Sarah Smith / John Cameron May 5, 2004 Review of Floodplain Alteration / Erosion Control Permit ApplicatiOns 1975 / 1989 Lakeside Lane - Mark Lee (Representative: Brenshell Homes) Local Ap~)roval for Surface Water Management Plan Upon approval of the Mound SurfaCe Water Management Plan by the Minnehaha Creek Board of Managers (MCWD) in AuguSt 20021 permitting responsibility for stormwater and floodplain alteration activities were transferred to the city of Mound. Project summary The applicant:is proposing to place 30 cubic yards of fill within the floodplain on the lakeside of the west lot so as to eliminate a Iow spot that allows standing water in the springtime. In order to provide adequate compensation, 30 cubic yards will be excaVated in the rear of the property alOng the Shared boundary' of the east and west lots. Therefore, the alteration project Will result in a no-net decrease in the 100:year flood storage. Permits Required According to the MCWD Rule criteria, the project requires a floodplain alteration (Rule C) permit. Additionally, an erosion control (Rule B) permit is also required. City of Mound Floodplain Alteration Regulation,-, The lO0-year floodplain elevation in the City of.Mound is 931.0. City Code Chapter 300.13,,Subd4 (b) states that the placement of fill in the flood fringe shall result ina no-net decrease in 100-year flood storage. In the event the floodplain compensation cannot be accommodated on-site, it must be accomplished on the same waterbody and in an appropriate location approved by the City. -1389- Pursuant to '~e'C~s n'b{~i'~h ,nts as set forth in .MCWD Rule A, a notice ............. r..eg~.i_ng the p~.posed.p_ro_0j~e~ was sen.t, t,_o_...,a_.l_l property owners loathed ·Within (~6_0_0.)_feet on to all public agencies as referenced on the, Combined Notification Form by the applicant. Additional Comments' 1. A minor Subdivision of the property located at 1975 / 1989 Lakeside Lane was approved by the City Council in Januanj 2003. A new single-family dwelling was constructed bY Mark and Becky Lee in July 2003. 2. City Engineer John Cameron and Public Works Director have reviewed and approved the proposed plan. 3. As of May 5, 2004, no publ c agency comments have been received. 4. Presently, the City Code does not require review of floodplain applications However, if it so desires, the city' C°unCii may remand the aPplicatibn t° ~he PLanning CommissiOn if it determines that their advice will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's planning and zoning objectives. Additionally, as discussed at the Apdl 26, 2004 joint Planning Commissign and City Council workshop, Staff contacted the Planning Commission Chair regarding the request who indicated that the application does ..not warrant review by the Planning Commission. 5. The application was deemed to be complete-on or: about April 6, 2004, Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government .agencies are required t° approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 .days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension. .and specifying how much additional time is needed. Members of the Council are advised that the deadline for formal action on the application is o~i or. about june 6, 2004. Recommendation i.. ; The City Engineer has recommended approval of ~he floOdplain alteration and erosion control ~it(~) sUbj~, to :~nditiOns. A draft resolution has been inClUded for review by the City council," · Page 2 - 1390- C CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING THrE FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION AND EROSION PERMITS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1975-1989 LAKESIDE LANE WHEREAS, the applicant, Mark Lee, has 'submitted a floodplain alteration and erosion control permit applications for the property loCated at 1975-1989 Lakeside Lane; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to place 1400 square feet (30 CY) within the floodplain on the lakeside of the west lot so as to eliminate a Iow spot which allows standing water in the springtime. In order to provide adequate compensation, 1400 square feet of fill will be excavated on the south (lake) side of the property along the shared boundary of the east and west lots; and WHEREAS, the alteration project will result in a no-net decrease in the 100-year flood storagel and .WHEREAS, permitting responsibilities for stormwater and erosion control were transferred from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to the City of Mound on August 22, 2002 following approval of the Mound Surface Water Management Plan by the MCWD Board of Managers; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 300.13 Subd 4 (b) states that the plaCement of fill. in the flood fringe shall result in a no-net decrease in 100-year flood storage; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 375.10, Subd. 2, requires the issuance of a erosion control permit for all land disturbing activities; and WHEREAS, the permit applications have been reviewed by the Director of Public Works and City Engineer and have been recommended for approval as they are consistent with the Mound Surface Water Management Plan, City Code Section 300.15 (Floodplain) and City Code Section 375.00 (Grading, Soil Erosion, Sedimentation Control and Stormwater Management). -1391 - NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. 'The flo0dplair~ 'alteration'"~nd er°Sion"'control permits are I~'~reby appr~ed for";[he property located at 1975-1989 Lakeside Lane subject to the following condition: a. The project shall be constructed according to the project plan that was approved by the City Council. b. The applicant shall apply for a grading permit which shall be subject to all comments from Staff. c. All fees associated with the City's review of the floodplain and erosion control permit shall be the responsibility of the applicant. d. The applicant shall comply to the extent required with the provisions of Section 300,15, Subd. 5and Section 375 of the City Code. e. Applicant shall be responsible for submittal of an as-built survey to ensure compliance with the approved project plan. The foregoing resolution was moved by CoUnCilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The folloWing Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 11~ day of May 2004. MaYor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk - 1392- MOUND CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council Will consider a floodplain alteration permit application from Mark and Becky Lee and Brenshell Homes on Tuesday, May 1 1, 2004 at 7:30 PM for the property located at 1975-1989 Lakeside Lane. The applicant proposes to fill approximately 1400 Square feet in the rear yard to mitigate seasonal standing water and will provide adequate compensation on site. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN. You are being provided' written notice as your .property is located within (600) feet of the subject site.. Information regarding the permit application can be obtained by contacting Public Works Director Carlton Moore at 952-472- 0636. Bonnie Ritter, City Cler~-/' Posted: May 3, 2004 ' '" --1393 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1394- 0-~ -o -' II o c ~-) --I ~rrl b-~ L x, C t 'x I [,o o o-- "-' cOCO ~,l'O ZU) Z 0 Z / / / / II / / / / / N. 'N ~o~"~''r m--iOn] ~--lmo o 0 0 )> :;0 ~ II II II II Tm ~C) 0 ~'~ II II II mo oo ~-~ i-- o i-- 0~ I,,0 0a ~ ...icn o c o I-ri ~ ,4 .I~. 0 I'0 ~ ~ 0,1 OZOF- O :;0 ~ X]m ~ (-.,4 Z0~0 > Oll U~z c) cO 0/28/03 PROP 931 CONTR GRDG PROJECT NO. ~ FEB. IO, 2003 j~E --V ONS j~/O;~_~)ROP B~CONTR GRD(~ HEREBY/CERTiJ~y THAT~J~"~SL~VEY WAS PREPARED f ME ~R UNITER MY J~lllr~EOT j~I/PERVISlON AND 4AT I ~M ~/DUL'I;"'~CllfSTER~' LAND SURVEYOR RA~.,~,~A~U~~, n'~,. u,.-..,~ -- ,, ~z~ 0 Z BUILDIflO PERM/T SUR VE Y BRENSHELL HOMES x CO II II II r'l-I - :;D X m C) "O ~ o Z ~ -O 0 '-ri 0 )> --I rrr ~z - m 0 0 ~Lanc Carda relle Surv, Frank R. y0r 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, C 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: May 6, 2004 SUBJECT: Proposed Text Amendments to City Code - Structures Temporary Membrane BACKGROUND At its April 27, 2004 meeting, the City Council held the public hearing for review of the proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to regulate temporary membrane structures. While the public hearing was closed, no action was taken on the proposed amendments and Staff was requested to research a number of items. Specific issues raised included the following: · The status of existing structures and whether or not temporary structure would be entitled to "legal nonconforming" status. · The application of the proposed regulations to boat canopies The applicability of setback standards for temporary structures. · The use of temporary structures in the commercial districts. COMMENTS Staff has reviewed the comments and offers the following comments and suggestions: Generally, it would be Staff's opinion that existing structures would be allowed to remain as legal non-conforming structures. The City Council should discuss whether or not it wishes to allow the use temporary membrane structures on an interim basis. If such structures are being installed as "permanent" accessory structures, the applicability of setback and commercial construction standards (ie. UBC) should be considered. - 1396- The Council may wish to waive the setback regulations if the structures are only to be allowed on an interim basis. o It may be advisable to consider directing Staff to undertake an inventory to determine how many structures currently exist with the City. This information would also be useful for determining which structures would be grandfathered as they predate the proposed new regulations. 2 -1397- May 7, 2004 City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1687 Re: 2004-2005 Labor Agreement With Teamsters Local No. 320 (Maintenance Unit) Dear Members of the City Council: A tentative agreement has been reached through the negotiation and mediation process for the 2004-2005 Labor Agreement with the Maintenance Bargaining Unit represented by Teamsters Local No. 320. Set forth below is a summary of the tentative agreement, which has been ratified by the bargaining unit. 1. Duration: Two year agreement effective January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2005. 2. Wages: 2004 2.0% wage increase 2005 2.5% wage increase 3. Health Insurance: 2004 City contribution up to $655 per month for family coverage. 2005 City contribution up to $705 per month for family coverage. 4. Dental Insurance: City contribution up to $28 per month for family coverage. 5. Post Employment Health Care Plan and Severance Pay City and Union will reopen these issues following City Council action on the Employee Committee's proposal for the Post Employment Health Care Plan. -1398- City Council May 7, 2004 Page 2 6. Overtime Pay Clean up language change to conform contract to past practice of the parties. 7. Uniforms T-shirts and parka provided by City shall be OSHA approved items. City shall be provide two additional t-shirts per year. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt and implement the 2004-2005 Labor Agreement with Teamsters Local 320. Very truly yours, SKH:clh cc: Kandis Hanson Susan K. Hansen - 1399- [] SIX REASONS WORK THROUGH THE MANAGER I'm a lucky city manager. I work for an excellent city council. Councilmembers take pride in promoting a tradition of community civility. They do their homework, serve for the right reasons, and have a sense of humor. They are supportive of staff, and they trust me. I can talk to them about almost anything. In such a healthy council-staff environ- ment, councilmembers get to know and trust many staffers, and a smart man- ager wouldn't want to lose the feeling of a friendly, open organization. So why is it necessary sometimes to remind our active and sincere coun- cilmembers to work through my office or through department heads when seeking information or expressing in- terests and concerns? And why do I feel so awkward when I do?2 Maybe it's because, no matter how diplomatically I express a desire that is consistent with our formal council poli- cies and procedures, it can come across as a trust-and-control issue. And since the councilmembers trust the staff, why shouldn't staff trust councilmembers?2 After all, their motivation is typically to avoid bothering me (or department heads) with the small stuff. What's there to hide?2 I guess this is where I am supposed to exclaim, "But it's not about trust and control!" In truth, however, it is, and here is wh)~ TRUST AND CONTROL The jewel in a healthy local government environment is trust. With trust, we spend our time working together to solve problems and to get good things done for the community. Without trust, problems multiply, and the time spent solving them prevents work on more constructive items. Preserving trust in any relationship, personal or professional, requires that we exercise a prudent amount of control in how we communicate: The council- staff relationship is no exception. In fact, g/ven the unique pressures and constraints imposed on this relation- ship, the two groups probably need even more structured guidance than most. A LOT OF RULES, BUT WHY DO WE NEED THEM? Fortunately, nearly all local govern- ments have some formal rules tn place, and virtually all such rules advise coun- cilmembers to work through city and county managers and department heads on most organizational matters. Even with all the rules, however, something significant is missing. Based on my research (admittedly not comprehensive, but I did check with ICMA, the League of California Cities, various trainers, and California city managers via an e-mail inquiry), there seems to be no prepared explana- t_ion for why such rules are important and how they preserve trust and benefit everyone involved in the relationship. In the absence of such context, the rules come across as, well, cold rules-- a list of dos and don'ts designed to keep everyone in line. This "context void" seems to be widely perceived by managers, and many of them have asked me to send them anything that I might find on the subject. Because I was unable to find anything already written, however, I have been forced to do a little more work. With the aid of some helpful managers, then, here are a half-dozen reasons why everyone's best interests are served when councilmembers work through the manager and/or depart- ment heads to gather information or address concerns. Reason I. Because city managers cannot be on top of things if they don't know what the things are. Councilmembers correctly expect man- agers to be on top of things. But if coun- citmembers bypass the manager to make requests of staff or to express concerns to staff, then the manager cannot possi- bly be sufficiendy aware of their interests or concerns. Even the world~ greatest local government manager cannot assure a timely response to a councilmember's inquiry if the manager is not aware of - 1400- the request in the first place. Sure, staff members can inform the manager of the request, but this roundabout way of communication raises the chances of miscommunication. Reason 2. Because bypassing the manager can give the impression that there is a problem in the council-manager relationship, and this perception can undermine both the manager's credibility within the organization and the re- spect that the staff feels for the councilmember. If a councilmember (or members) consistently goes directly to other staff members with issues, these harmfu! perceptions may evolve: 1) the councilmember does not like to work with the manager; 2) the coun- cilmember does not trust the informa- tion provided by the manager; 3) the manager is ducking his or her responsi- bility and just "passing the buck"; 4) the councihnember does not play by the rules and seeks special treatment; and/or 5) it must be okay for staff to go around the manager because coun- cilmembers do it. Such impressions will weaken a manager's credibility and au- thority in the organization or reflect poorly on the councilmember, or both. Reason 3. Because it is not possible for managers to treat all coun- cilmembers equally if the manager is unaware of the treatment that one councilmember is getting. Man- agers are in the highly unusual position of having many, equal bosses, and the expectation of equal treatment by each of those bosses is not only extremely high but also entirely appropriate. Equal treatment includes providing councilmembers with the same infor- mation, the same levels of support, and the same accessibility to the staff in general. Thus, when an elected council- lor goes through the manager in mak- ing a request, the manager can judge if the desired information should be shared with all councilmembers. The manager can also judge whether a request for staff work is consistent with council policy or if the full council should direct such work. If requests are only inconsistently made through the manager, then the likelihood of in- equities cropping up over time is high. This leads us to Reason 4. Reason 4. Because councilmem. bers are often perceived as having "awesome power" and, therefore, direct requests can lead to surpris- ing and negative unintended conse- quences. Councilmembers may con- tact staff people in a department to make what they perceive to be "simple requests for information," only to find these requests later perceived as orders to do something never intended by the councilmembers. This is especially possible when di- rect contacts are made with staff below the department-head level Coun~ cilmembers are typically surprised by such overreactions and by the complica- tions and rumors that can result (be- cause they know they don't have that much power). But to the staff member who seldom has contact with the higher-ups, the mayor and councilmem- bers are as "high up" as they come. Reason 5. Because direct coun- cilmember contact with staff mem- bers below the department-head level boosts the likelihood of get- ting erroneous or incomplete infor- mation. The further a councilmember reaches beyond the manager or depart- ment head, the more likely he or she will communicate with someone who has significantly less familiarity with the legislative process, the deeper con- text of various local government issues, the cross-departmental stakeholders who should be consulted, and the local rules for staff-council communication. Combine these differences with the "awesome power" phenomenon, and the margin for a mistake in responding to the councilmember climbs substan- tially. On the other hand, a manager can provide one-stop service, saving time while producing better, more complete information. Reason 6. Because such direct councilmember contact also can in- advertently cause awkward, embar- www. icma. org/prn -1401 - rassing situations---or worse~for the staff members involved. After a Reason 5 scenario has occurred, a staff. member who later learns that he pro- vided incorrect or incomplete informa- tion feels embarrassed. In fact, a staff member who learns that she violated some staff-council communication rule is not only embarrassed but also wor- ried that she might be perceived as act- ing politically and undermining her bosses. A staff member who incorrectly completes excessive work at the direc- tion of an individual councilmember may perceive him- or herself to be "in trouble," especially if they have failed to notify their bosses or failed to com- plete other assigned work as a result. AN UGLY TRUTH, BUT NOT FOR MOST There is one unfortunate truth that needs to be recognized: not everyone is sincere or competent in council-man- ager relationships. There are coun- cilmembers who deliberately try to un- dermine the system, and there are managers who are not responsive to councilmember inquiries. For such people, this article will not help, and any solution probably needs to be found through a closed-session discus- sion but not through short-cutting the system. Fortunately, most elected officials and managers want the system and the relationships to work in the best possi- ble way. To achieve this end, is it neces- sary for every little thing to go through the manager? No. What is required, however, is an understanding between the council and the manager as to what differentiates a little thing from a big- ger thing. This can only be achieved if the elected officials and manager are regularly talking and if there is a true commitment by all to play by the rules. Such rules are worthy of commit- ment, and we can help uphold an excel- lent system while still preserving city hall as an open, friendly, helpful place. --Ken Hampian City Manager San Luis Obispo, California (khampian@slocity. org) COUNTY ROAD 15 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECiT COUNTY ROAD 15 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT UPDATE Thirty plus years after its inception, the County Road 15 Realignment Project has finally begun. Some building demolition took place in 2003, and more is scheduled for April, 2004. In January, Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority made a request to the Surface Transportation Board to abandon the rail line to allow for its use as a future trail. The abandonment of the rail line has been approved and the tracks are being removed. The City also completed the exchange of property with Xcel Energy, at no cost to the City to allow for the realigmnent of the new road and construction of a stormwater pond. Most overhead utility lines will be relocated underground. Within a few weeks, the traffic signals at Lynwood and County Rd 110 will be removed and a four- way stop will be installed, just during the construction phase Please note that the timeframes mentioned here are approximate, as weather is always a factor during construction. For your safety and the safety of those working on the project, we urge you to use caution while traveling within the road work area. Your assistance in reminding area children to stay clear of construction equipment and open trenches is helpful in maintaining a safe environment. We thank you for your patience, cooperation and understanding during this project. Any time a construction project takes place, there are inconveniences, but we believe these projects will result in a more attractive and safer environment for both roadway traffic and pedestrians. If you have any questions or concems regarding this project, please contact Public Works at 952-472-0615. The phasing of the road construction project will facilitate traffic throughout construction, although motorists are advised to expect lane closures and minor delays. With the exception of the final landscaping which will be completed in the spring of 2005, the roadway portion of the project is scheduled for completion in November, 2004. Electronic Update: A copy of the CSAH 15 Road Project Update can also be provided in electronic form. Anyone interested in being added to the e-mail list is respectfully requested to contact Denice Widmer at 952-472-0615 or at denicewidmer@cityofmound.com 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 - 1402- - 1403- Date Harbor Wine & Spirits Monthly Comparison Weather Cust 04 Cust 03 Variance Sales 04 4/1/2003 sunny/warm 287 291 -4 4766.85 4/2/2003 sunny/warm 387 260 127 85066 4/3/2003 SUNNYCOOI 481 301 180 9982.34 4/4/2003 498 -498 4/5/2003 SUNNY/WAF 215 570 -355 3746.47 4/6/2003 Sunny/Warm 253 253 5163.33 4/7/2003 COOL/WIND 203 237 -34 3340.14 4/8/2003 sunny 258 257 1 5808.46 4/9/2003 cool 433 291 142 9287.37 4/10/2003 sunny/cool 569 294 275 13390.27 4/11/2003 593 -593 4/12/2003 sunny/cool 202 677 -475 3080.08 4/13/2003 sunny/nice 222 222 4158.1 4/14/2003 sunny/warm 266 327 -61 3939.27 4/15/2003 sunny/warm 268 276 -8 4470.75 4/16/2003 PTLY/CLDY 454 234 220 8598.13 4/17/2003 PTLY/CLDY 519 316 203 10055.32 4/18/2003 526 -526 4/19/2003 PTLY/CLDY 240 685 -445 3517.14 4/20/2003 RAIN 200 200 2983.42 4/21/2003 cloudy 240 276 -36 3429.3 4/22/2003 cool 271 258 13 4443.92 4/23/2003 sunny/cool 428 311 117 8571.31 4/24/2003 SUNNY/COC 494 322 172 10063.43 4/25/2003 570 -570 4/26/2003 sunny/cool 209 683 -474 3417.48 4/27/2003 PTLY/CLDY 201 201 2771.82 4/28/2003 90 degrees 261 289 -28 4040.36 4/29/2003 cool 220 282 -62 3357.75 4/30/2003 sunny/cool 440 255 185 8045.79 Totals 8221 9879 - 1658 152935.2 Sales 03 4365.43 377~.~t 4375.44 9086.5 1 O528.93 3528.28 3492.48 4023.33 5203.48 10540.27 13456,76 4997.35 3884.48 3412.91 4673.47 10150.52 14428.1 4059.63 3953.52 4492.55 5131.08 10682.97 13045.87 3828.27 4329,94 4050.24 167497.41 Difference +/- 401.42 4730.99 5606.9 -9086.5 -6782.46 5163.33 -188.14 2315.98 5264.04 8186.79 -10540.27 -10376.68 4158,1 -1058.08 586.27 5185.22 5381.85 -10150.52 -10910.96 2983.42 -630.33 490.4 4O78.76 4932.35 -10682.97 -9628.39 2771.82 212.09 -972.19 3995.55 -14562.21 - 1404- fipr 38 Z884 16:55:47 Via Fax -> 95Z4?ZBGZ8 fldministrator Page 801 Of 884 · -FrldayFax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Full Senate approves Tax bill On Thursday, the full Senate amended and then passed their version of the 2004 omnibus tax bill. As adopted, the bill includes a restoration of $60 million of the $150 million cut in LGA, and general authority for cities of the first, second and third class to impose a local sales tax for certain types of capital projects. And like the House bill, the Senate offering contains no levy limits. The Senate tax proposal was processed as a "delete-all" amendment to H.F. 2540, which was the House tax bill that was transmitted to the Senate earlier in the week. That bill will now be sent back to the House where we expect the House to refuse to concur which will set up a possible conference committee during the remaining two weeks of the session. We use the term "possible" because there are whispers that this may be the year where no tax bill is passed. Below is a brief description of the changes adopted by the Senate during the Thursday floor session. For a more complete description of the bill as it emerged from the Tax Committee, see this week's Cities Bulletin. Local Government Aid The bill approved by the Senate appropriates $60 million to the LGA formula for distribution in 2005 and increases the appropriation by an additional $6 million for the 2006 distribution. Senator Larry Pogemiller, the Senate Tax Chair added an amendment on the floor that will inflate the LGA appropriation by $6 million until the formula is fully funded, as measured by funding 100 percent of the need/capacity gap measured by the formula. April 30, 2004 Page 1 The bill continues to include a repeal of the phase-in of the taconite aid offset to the LGA formula. In 2003, the legislature modified the LGA formula to include taconite aid payments in the measure of a city's ability to raise local revenue. In other words, the 2003 change, if left in place, would reduce LGA distributions to cities receiving taconite aid distributions. The bill modifies the 2001 law that provided additional LGA to cities over 10,000 population outside the metropolitan area. Under that 2001 law, a city with a population over 10,000 according to the 2000 Federal Census would receive an additional $60 per capita for any population over 5,000, up to a maximum of $2.5 million. The Senate bill eliminates the reference to the 2000 Census, which would otherwise allow any city with an annual population estimate over 10,000 to receive an $60 per capita for each additional person up to a $2.5 million maximum. However, the Senate change is limited by another provision in current law to LGA distributions in 2002 only which would seem to make the change meaningless for future distributions. Senator Mike McGinn (R-Eagan) offered an amendment that would have repealed many of the proposed changes to LGA contained in the Senate Tax Committee draft including the repeal of the taconite aid offset and the appropriation increase. His amendment was defeated. Estimates of the impact of the Senate LGA changes will be available on the League's web site at ww~y_.J,!.n_~.c,._o_rg. Local Sales Tax authorization The bill reported out of the Senate Tax Committee included roughly a dozen For more information on city legislative [,tsuaa, contact any member of the League of Minnesota Cities Intergovernmantal Relations learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1405- ~pr 38 2084 1G:5G:Z9 ~i~ Fax -> 55247ZflGZfl ~d~inis~ra~or Page 00Z Of C authorizations for specific cities to impose local sales taxes or to modify their existing local sales taxes. Senator Sheila Kiscaden (I- Rochester) offered an amendment that would allow Minneapolis, St. Paul and Duluth (first class cities) to impose a sales tax by ordinance and would create a general process for cities of the first, second and third class cities or effectively all cities over 10,000 population to impose up to a ~/~ cent local sales tax for certain types of capital projects. Although a similar stand-alone Kiscaden bill offered during the session would have restricted the authority to cities outside the seven-county metro areas the amendment offered on the floor contained no such restriction. - Frid ay Fax- A wee/dy legislative update.from the League of Minnesota Cities April 30, 2004 Page 2 Any city under 10,000 population, or cities over 10,000 population that would seek to impose a local sales tax for any other use would have to continue to seek special legislative authorization. Senators Pogemiller (DFL-Minneapolis), Betzold (DFL~Fridley), Klels (R-St. Cloud) Senjem (R-Rochester) all spoke in favor of the Kiscaden amendment. Senator Kleis' only concern was related to the referendum requirement, which would have allowed a city to conduct the required referendum at either a general or a special election. He successfully moved to restrict the referendum requirement to only general elections. After a remarkably short discussion, the modified Kiscaden amendment passed on a voice vote. The Kiscaden local sales tax provisions restrict the uses of the tax proceeds to capital projects with regional benefits including regional convention or civic centers, regional airports, public libraries, a city's matching fund requirement for major capital infrastructure irnprovements to arterial road, bridges or railroads, public safety equipment or facilities for dispatching communications, computers or training or flood control or protection. The Sales tax would only remain in effect for Fee Study As the bill emerged from the Tax Committee, it contained a requirement for a study of state agency and school district fee increases that would be conducted by the Department of Revenue. The study language was purportedly added in response to ongoing Senate Tax Committee member discussions about recent increases in governmental fees. Most of the committee discussions specifically focused on the effect of the 2003 budget cuts on fees. In his initial author's amendment, Senator Poge,'niller added a similar study of city fees to the bill. Under the amendment, the Department of Revenue must collect information on fee increases imposed by cities by January 15, 2005 and submit a report to the legislature by February 15. The Department is required to collect information on the type and amount of fees imposed by each city, the revenues derived from each fee for each of the most recent four calendar years and the use of the revenues from the fees. The House bill has no similar language and it is unclear whether the Department of Revenue, or cities for that matter, can gather and compile the information within the required time frame. The end-game? With the constitutional deadline for the end of session just two weeks away, capital insiders and others are wondering how and when the session will end. Key legislative issues have For more information on city legislative issues, conlacl any member of Ihe League of Minnesota Cities Interg0vernmenlal Relations learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1406- ~pr 38 Z004 1G:57:11 ~ia ~ax -> 55Z47ZOGZO ~i~is~ra~or P~§e BO~ 0£ 004 - Frid ay Fax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities become more and more divisive between the House and Senate as this session nears the constitutional adjournment date, particularly with deciding how the remaining omnibus bills will be processed. One major sticking point ia how to conference the very different approaches used by the House and Senate to balance the $160 million budget deficit and provide additional funding for certain policy priorities, such as crime prevention and health care. The Senate solution is contained in two billsmHF 956, which includes spending reductions to address the budget deficit, and HF 2028 which contains the Senate's supplemental appropriations and certain budget cuts and revenue increases to cover these new costs. The House passed eight separate pieces of legislation that together resolve the $160 million budget deficit and make supplemental appropriations--each bill corresponding to certain related issue areas. April 30, 2004 Page 3 Earlier this week, the House actually took-up the Senate's supplemental budget bill, HF 2028, on the floor. A motion was made to send the bill back to the Senate for further consideration. This move was triggered by House members who believe that the Senate's supplemental appropriations bill is unconstitutional because it addresses several different fiscal and policy subjects in a single bill. This motion would have required a suspension of the Rules--which requires a 2/3 majoritymand the House was not able to get enough votes to send the bill back to the Senate. After the vote to send HF 2028 back failed, a motion was made to concur with the Senate bill. This move forced the DFL House members to take an official position on the Senate DFL plan. The motion failed on a vote of 4-124. The House then voted to place the bill back on the table, which has the effect of preventing the appointment of a conference committee. Under the Senate's two-bill plan, fewer members would conferee the omnibus bill while the House would include more members in final negotiations over several omnibus budget bills. Omnibus budget bill conference committees have traditionally involved five members from each body who iron out a compromise. Conference committees on smaller bills often have three members from each side. The delay in the budget-balancing proposals is affecting other major unresolved issues, including the bonding bill and the tax bill. Both House and Senate leadership have sent the message that the state budget deficit must be resolved before others matters can be worked out. Other unresolved issues include a possible stadium bill and a variety of policy matters. The House passed a bonding bill off the floor on Thursday afternoon that includes projects from around the state, but not the controversial Northstar commuter rail project. For weeks Senate members have said that they would release a bill once the House was able to pass something off the floor, and there was some speculation that the House might not be able to do that given the 60 percent majority requirement to pass a bonding bill The Senate is expected to publicly release their bill early next week. The House Tax committee has spent the week discussing the stadium bill, and the Senate has indicated they will hold hearings on this issue in the upcoming days. Gambling remains another issue for the Legislature to consider in the respective tax committees, although the For mote information on city legislative issues, comact any member of Ihe L~ague of Minnesota C[lies Intergovernmental Relations team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1407- ~r 30 Z004 1G:57:54 ~a Fax il mjb ,& ~ , Jl -> 95Z4?ZOGZO fl&minim'ore,or P~ge 884 0£ 884 -FridayFax- Racino proposal was approved last year by the House and that could be rejuvenated by the Senate. A weekly legislative update.from the League of Minnesota Cities April 30, 2004 Page 4 To participate contact Lynn Peterson 651.281.1254 or lpoterson~lmnc.org. But with just two weeks left to go in the official session, there is a tremendous amount of work to complete--not only on fiscal matters, but also some major policy issues. For a more complete run-down on the status of various policy and fiscal issues, see the legislative update in the April 28 edition of the Cities Bulletin. With the volume of work remaining, a special session is beginning to appear like a certainty. If the legislature fails to complete its work, the question becomes when, and under what circumstances, will the governor call the legislature back. Stay tuned. Take part in LMC policy committees Soon it will be time to begin preparing for the 2005 legislative session with the League's policy development committees. This is your opportunity to help the League establish its legislative policies for the coming two-year period. There will be 3 to 4 meetings per policy committee from June through September held at the League office in St. Paul. The four policy comrnittees are: Improving Local Economies, Improving Service Delivery, Improving Fiscal Futures, Personnel Services. At LMC Regional Meetings during July and August, members will have an opportunity to review the policy issues that policy committee members crafted during their first meetings in June. Members will then be able to comment on the policy committees' draft policies during the fall Annual Conference to be held October 9 - 12 in Duluth. Upcoming committee hearings Tuesday, May 4, 2004 Senate Capital Investment Committee 9:00 am Room 123, State Capitol Agenda: S.F. 2097-Ranum: Clarifying division of proceeds of sale of state bond financed property. S.F. XXXX-Langseth: Omnibus bonding bill. Senate Finance Committee Immediately after session (session is at 12 noon) Room 123, State Capitol Agenda: S.F. 1774-Kelley: Omnibus education bill. S.F. XXXX-Langseth: Bonding bill. Other agenda items to be announced. House Ways and Means Committee 2:00 pm or after the House Floor Session Basement Hearing Room, State Office Building Agenda: To Be Announced* Thursday~ May 6~ 2004 House Ways and Means Committee 2:00 pm or after the House Floor Session Room 200, State Office Building Agenda: To Be Announced* * HF 2625 (Kuisle), a bill that includes property appraisal and eminent domain provisions, may be heard. For mote [nfotmalion on city legiqaliv¢ [asue~, contacl any member of the League of Minne,~ola C[liea Intergovernmental Relations team, 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1408- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, April 28, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad READING OF MINUTES- 4/14/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. LAKE USE & RECRETATION A) Three Rivers Park District, presentation of"2003 Water Quality of Lake Minnetonka" Report by John. Barten; B) (*) Hennepin County SherifFs Office Water Patrol Significant ACtivity Report; C) Additional Business; WATER STRUCTURES A) Kenneth Peterson, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length variance application at 1074 Wildhurst Trail on Forest Lake; B) Shorewood Yacht Club (Site 2), consideration of 2004 renewal, without change, multiple dock license application; c) (*) 2004 Multiple Dock and DMA Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewal, without change, applications for Al & Alma's, Minnetonka Yacht Club (DMA), and Wayzata Marine; D) Additional Business; 3. FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (4/16/04 - 4/30/04); B) (*) March financial summary and balance sheet; C) Additional Business; - 1409- EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A) (*) Minutes from the 4/9/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting (handout); B) Evaluation of Truck Hauling Bids for the 2004 EWM/Harvesting Season; C) 2004 EWM Harvesting Season, staff overview of project (handout); D) Additional Business; 5. ADMINISTRATION A) Training Session for Board members on Open Meeting Law; B) LMCIT Liability Coverage- Waiver Form, discussion by Board on the amount of liability coverage for 2004 and whether to waive monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; C) Additional Business; 6. SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT -1410- · DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT . BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, April 14, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER .Van Hercke called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orr Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Debbie Halvorson, Orono; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Tom Scanlon, Spdng Park; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Vice Chair Van Hercke There were no Chair announcements. READING OF MINUTES. 3/10/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 3/24/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Knudsen moved, Seuntjens seconded to approve the minutes from the 3/10/04 Regular LMCD Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: . Ayes (9), Abstained (3; Ambrose, Canning, and Valdesuso); motion carried. MOTION: Burma moved, Halvorson seconded to approve the minutes from the 3/24/04 Regular LMCD BOard Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (11), Abstained (1, Canning); motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) Mr. Jay Goetz, 19610 Cottagewood Road, stated that he and his wife were the adjacent neighbor to the west of the recently approved multiple dock facility on the south end of Carsons Bay. He pointed out that he and his wife originally had environmental concerns relating to the docks; however, they decided not to participate in the decision making process when it became apparent that the City of Deephaven and the Board did not share similar concerns. He expressed his disappointment with the outcome; however, they have decided to live with the outcome. He stated that he planned to put a canoe landing at the site recently established for Maple Hills -1411 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District RegUlar Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page2 Association and he believed that some. of his land had been taken away frOm him with the approved variance from LMCB Code for an adjusted dock use area. Van Hercke questioned whether this was a land issue or whether it was something the Board would get involved with. LeFevere stated that approval of the Maple Hills Association variance order by the LMCD was contingent upon approval of the repiat by the City of Deephaven. Goetz stated that he believed the survey work was conducted when the lake levels on Lake Minnetonka were quite high. He questioned whether this would have affected the outcomes of these surveys. LeFevere stated that he did not believe surveys conducted at different times with different lake levels was significant because LMCD Code requires the applicant to establish elevation 929';4~ on bOth surveys. He recalled that this elevation was established on the survey submitted by Maple Hills AsSoCiation. Nybeck stated that Mr. Goetz had recently contacted the LMCB office to point out the same issues he summarized for the Board. He requested that LMOD staff stop the construction of the docks recently aPproved by the Board and he was informed that this could not be done. Nybeck pointed out that he was willing to meet with Mr. Goetz; however, he expressed concern about whether the LMCD was the proper venue to resolve conflicting surveys. He recommended that this should be resolved with the applicant or the City of Deephaven. If this cannot be accomplished, Mr. Goetz may need to resolve it in the legal system if he and his wife choose to proceed. He concluded by. stating that he believed the City of Deephaven had recently approved the replat and land transfers with the Maple Hills Association and the Tallaksons. LeFevere stated that the LMCD does not have the jurisdiction to resolve property ownership and line conflicts if they exist, He believed that this would need to go to court and be adjudicated at that level. The Board discussed this matter and the consensus of the Board was that the Goetzs should address this matter with the City of Deephaven, the courts, or through arbitration. If the facts change based on the outcome of this decision making process, the Board would need to readdress this matter at that time because it would change the facts of the approved variance order. CONSENT AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda; Nybeck requested that agenda item 2B be removed from the consent agenda because the minutes from the 4/9/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force meeting had not been completed. Seuntjens moved, Ambrose seconded to approve the consent agenda as amended by removing agenda item 2B. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include: 1C, 2004 Multiple DoCk Licenses, Staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewaJ, without change, applications for FoXhill HCA and UPper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club, and 4A 2004 Liquor Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of renewai lntoxicating Liquor, Wine, and Non-Intoxicating Liquor License applications as outlined in the 4/8/04 staff memo. -1412- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS · Excelsior Bay Charters, new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application for the charter boat; Summer Winds, Van Hercke opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. and asked for background from Harper. Harper made the following comments: · Excelsior Bay Charters has submitted a new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application for the charter boat, Summer Winds. A public hearing was published in the 3/30/04 edition Of the Lakeshore Weekly News. · The applioant purchased the boat from Cruise Headquarters that was licensed as the charter boat Sea Breeze with one of the 14 on-saleintoxicating liquor licenSes in 2003. Consistent with the policy adopted by the Board on 5/10/00, pdodty shall be given to an applicant who is purchasing a licensee's boat and business, provided that license is being relinquished (or is not being renewed) by the seller. · The Hennepin County Shedffs Department has COnducted its preliminary investigation for Excelsior Bay Charters and it was satisfactory. · The applicant has identified the CitieS of Excelsior and Wayzata as ports of call for 2004. Consistent with LMCD Code, these cities were forwarded a certificate to authorize these ports of call. Both cities have authorized these' ports of call. · Fees collected by the LMCD include $1,000 for the annual on-sale intoxicating liquor license application, $150 for the annual special license authorizing intoxication liquor on Sundays, and a one- time $3,000 preliminary investigation deposit that can be refunded. · He recommended the Board approve the new on-sale intoxicating liquor application, with Sunday option, for the 2004 boating season. Additionally, he recommended the Board approve a full refund of the $3,000 preliminary investigation deposit. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Van Hercke pointed out that there were no questions or comments from the Board. She asked the applicant if he had any comments he would like to bring to the Board's attention. Mr. David Gross, representing the applicant, stated that he had no additional comments. Van Hercke pointed out there were no questions of the applicant by the Board or anyone else in attendance to comment on the application. There being no further comments, Van Hemke closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. MOTION: Babcock moved, Seuntjens seconded to: 1) approve the new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application, with Sunday option, for the 2004 season, and 2) approve a full refund of the $3,000 preliminary investigation. VOTE: Motion carried unanimouslY. · Queen of Excelsior, Inc., new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application for the charter boat, Queen of Excelsior II1. -1413- 0 Oi La'ke Minnetonka Conservation District · Eegular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Van Hercke opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. and asked for background from Harper. Page 4 Harper stated that this application was similar to the Excelsior Bay Charters new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application and he made similar comments. He clarified that the applicant purchased the Isabella from Sunboat Cruises, which had one of the 14 intoxicating liquor license applications in 2003. Similar to Excelsior Bay Charters, Queen of Excelsior, Inc. has proposed the Cities of Excelsior and Wayzata as ports of call for 2004. Both cities have authorized these ports of call. One difference was that SUnboat Cruises submitted $1,150 for their renewal, with Sunday option liquor license application for the 2004 season to ensure their priodty for the 2004 season because the transaction was taking place around the February 1st deadline. He recommended the Board approve the new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application, with Sunday option, for the charter Queen of Excelsior III for the 2004 season. Additionally, he recommended that the BOard approve a refund of $1,150 to Sunboat Cruises of Lake Minnetonka for the duplicate fees they submitted for 2004. Van Hercke asked the Board if they had questions for Harper. Canning stated for the record that the apPlicant was a business client of his. Van Hercke pointed out that the applicant was not in attendance to comment on the application. Additionally, she pointed out that there was not no one else in attendance to comment on the application, There being no further comments, Van Hercke closed the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. MOTION: Ambrose moved, Valdesuso seconded to: 1) approve the new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application, with Sunday option, for the 2004 season, and 2) approve a full refund of the $3,000 preliminary inVestigation fee. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. · Kenneth Peterson, variance application from LMCD Code for dock lengtl~ requirements at 1074 Wildhurst Trail. Van Hercke opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. and asked for background from Harper. Harper made the following comments: · Mr. Kenneth Peterson has submitted a variance application for Board consideration on Forest Lake in the City of Orono. The application was submitted for variance from LMCD Code for dock length, with a particular hardship of shallow water. ° The applicant has submitted the variance application for a dock that would extend approximately 122' from the 929.4' shoreline to reach a water depth of four feet at the outer end. of the dock. The dock would originate from approximately 180' of continuous shorelihe and would store four restricted watercraft at it. These include a 10' x 28' Boat Storage Unit (BSU), an 8' x 19' runabout, and two personal watercraft. ° In 2003, the Board approved a dock length variance application for the abutting property owner to the south, Lisa Ryskamp, with a particular hardship of shallow water. The Board approved a 119' long -1414- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page 5 dock originating from 103' of 929.4' shoreline with the ability to store four restricted watercraft, provided they are owned and registered to the residents of the site. Code Section 2.01 prohibits a person from installing a dock and storing watercraft outside an authorized dock use area, He pointed out that the dock and boat storage would be contained within the authorized dock use area for this site, with the exception that it exceeds the 100' length restriction. · Code Section 1.07 allows the Board to permit a variance, with conditions deemed necessary, where practical difficulties or particular hardships are caused by the application of the~Code. To ensure this, the Board should apply decision standards in the review of vadanCe applications. These include: 1) is the proposed use reasonable, 2) Would it be unreasonable to require conformance to this ordinance, 3) is the difficulty of conforming to the ordinance' due to circumstances unique to the property, 4) Is the problem one created by the applicant, and 5) Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the locality. He pointed out that he believed the proposed use was reaSOnable for a 180'+ site because the adjacent site was granted a dock. length variance for a dock with a similar length, He pointed out that he believed the application also met the remaining decision standards. · In compliance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, the MN DNR and the City of Orono were provided .a copy of the variance application on 3/26~04, with comments due in the LMCD office by 4/8/04, No comments have been received from the MN DNR or the City of Orono. · He recommended the Board direct the LMCD attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length variance, with a particular hardship of shallow water. He questioned whether the Board might want to include a restriction that all watercraft at the dock be owned and registered to the residents of this site. Additionally, he questioned wheth:er the applicant would like to amend their proposed site plan so that the two personal watercraft would be stored along the shore similar to the Ryskamp approved variance. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Halvorson questioned whether a condition to restrict watercraft to the residents of the site was necessary because She believed the City of Orono would already prohibit the renting of watercraft. Seuntjens stated the proposed plan would have four feet of water depth at the end of the dock from elevation 929.4'. The lake was currently lower than normal at this time of year and he questioned the applicant whether he would be making an application to amend an approved variance sometime in the near future, Mr. Kenneth Peterson, 1074 Wildhurst Trail, stated that he did not think he would be re-applying for a variance in the near future because the four feet meets the standards established by LMCD Code and that shallow water is not uncommon at the tail end of each boating season. Van Hercke pointed out that there were not any additional members of the public to comment on the application. There being no further comments, Van Hercke closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. She asked for comments from the Board or entertained a motion. MOTION: Suerth moved, Babcock seconded to direct the LMCD attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the Kenneth Peterson variance application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements, subject to all watercraft to be stored at this dock to be owned and registered to the residents of this site. -1415- C, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page 6 VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Seuntjens stated that there appeared to be another site in this immediate area that was too long that should Be checked into further by staff. Lafayette Ridge HOA, new multiple dock license application to increase the Size of Boat Storage Units (BSU's) at the conforming facility on Lafayette Bay. Van Hercke opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. and asked for background Harper. Harper made the following comments: Lafayette Ridge HOA has submitted a new multiple dock license application for Board consideration on Lafayette Bay in the City of Minnetonka Beaoh. The facility is currently considered a legal, conforming facility with 16 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 804' of continuous shoreline. · The applicant has proposed to increase the dimensions of the 16 BSU's from 14'x 32' to 16'x 32'. Pursuant to LMCD Code, a public headng notice was published in the 3/30/04 edition of the Lakeshore Weekly News. o Code Section 2.03 requires a new multiple dock license application when there is any change in slip size, ownership, width, height or location of a structure. The proposal requireS a neW'multiple dock license application, with public hearing, because of the increase in slip sizes and the added dock structure, Code Section 2.01 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for the placement of a dock and the storage of watercraft. The proposal would be contained within the authorized dock use area for this site. o The proposal does not need to have a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) prepared because the cumulative square footage for structure and maneuvering space would be 19,888. Environmental Quality Board rules do not require a mandatory EAW until dock structure and maneuvering space square feet exceed 20,000. In accordance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, the MN DNR and the City of Minnetonka Beach were provided a copy of the application on 3/26/04, with comments due in the LMCD office by 4/8/04. No comments have been received from the MN DNR or the City of Minnetonka Beach. ° He reoommended the Board approve the Lafayette Bay HOA new multiple dock license application for the 2004. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Van Hercke pointed out that there were no comments from the Board for Harper. She asked the applicant if she would like comments. Ms. Jill Huber, representing the applicant, stated that she had no additional comments and that she was available to address questions of the Board. Suerth asked Huber what the need was for 16' wide slips. -1416- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page 7 Huber stated that them were wider boats within the Association, and that having all slips 16' wide would provide them flexibilitY sO that they would not need to m-apply for wider slips in the futura. Van Hercke pointed out that there were not additional members of the public to comment on the application. Them being no further comments, Van Hemke closed the public hearing at 7:44 p.m, MOTION: Babccok moved, Ambrose seconded to approve the Lafayette Ridge HOA new multiple dock license application for the 2004 season, subject to carrying forward the license condition from pm vious seasons mquiring shielding for lighting at the dock. Harper stated that the 2003 license condition mquiring shielding for lighting was m solved last summer, VOTE: Motion carded unanimously, Seuntjens stated that it would be beneficial for staff to better ensure in that futura certified surveys submitted for Board consideration Clarifies the amount of continuous 929.4' shoreline at the site and better label the site lines that define the authorized dock use ama for each site. He belieVed that this would better assist the Board in its decision making process. WATER STRUCTURES A. Hary KreSlins, new multiple dock license application to increase BOat Storage Units (BSU's) from six to eight at 21965 Minnetonka Blvd. on St. Albans Bay (Public Headng conducted at 3/10/04 Regular Board Meeting). Van Hercke introduced the agenda item by stating it was not a scheduled public headng. However, if a Board member would like to ask a question of either the applicant or a member of the public, she believed that this could be done as long as the comments from the public am focused. She asked for background on this agenda item from Harper. Harper made the following comments: · The applicant submitted a new multiple dock license application for Board consideration in 2003. The facility was approved for six BSU's, on approximately 320' of continuous 929.4' shoreline in 2002. This' site was considered a legal, conforming facility for density purposes in 2002 with a BSU density of approximatelY 1:53'. In 2003, the applicant provided a certified survey that documented 407' of 929.4' shoreline rather than the 320' assumed in 2002. · Because of the increase in shoreline, the applicant applied for two additional BSU's in 2003. If approved, the BSU density would be approximately 1:51'. He suggested that the discrepancies in shoreline might be attributed to hand drawn site plans that were approved since the 1980's rather than the certified survey that has been submitted by the applicant. The facility is currently approved for throe 32' long docks and one 24' long dock. The applicant has proposed to increase the length of two of the docks and decrease the width'of all of the doCks. · A public hearing was conducted at the 3/10/04 RegUlar Meeting; however, no action was taken by the Board because they had throe concerns they Wanted the apPiicant to resolve. These included: 1) clarification of the easements on the property to ensure that them am no restrictions on docking, 2) clarification of Note 1 on the survey that stated "Boundary and' easement -1417- C Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page 8 information is subject to change and is to be added pending receipt of current deed and title information"', and 3) to secure ar~ aerial photo of the proposed site, with the other sites in the · immediate area, to ensure that the dock and boat storage would not create an impediment to navigation, especially to the Beans Greenwood Marina gas dock. To comply with this direction, the applicant haS submitted a document stating that the easement With the Nedegard Construction Company haS been released. The applicant has also submitted an updated survey, with an updated title commitment, which documents the encumbrances on the title for the site. Additionally, Staff has enClosed an aerial photo taken in April 2002 that depicts the proximity of the apPliCant's docks to the channel from ExcelsiOr Bay that eventually.leads to the Beans Greenwood Marina gas dock. Code Section 2.03 requires a new multiple dock license when there is any change in slip size, ownership, width, height or location of a structure. The proposal requires a new multiple dock license application, with public hearing, because of the increased slip sizes and the added dock structure. Code Section 2.01 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for the placement of.a dock and the storage of watercraft. The proposal would be contained within the authorized dock use area for this site. Harper pointed out that he believed the 407' of shoreline claimed by the applicant was under the control of the applicant and free of encumbrances. Additionally, he did not believe the proposal would create an impediment to navigation. In accordance with MN DNR general Permit 97-6098, the MN DNR and the City of Greenwood were provided a copy of the new multiple dock license application in 2003. No comments were received from the MN DNR in 2003; however, comments were received from the City of Greenwood. They expressed concern about the proposed number of BSU's and the restriction in the Greenwood Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for this site. At that time, the applicant agreed to work with the City of Greenwood and submitted an application to the city. The City of Greenwood has recently denied the applicant's application and a letter, dated 3/29/04, summarizes their reasOns for denial. Harper pointed out that although he recognized the City of Greenwood concerns, the application meets the LMCD objective criteria for density and authorized dock use area requirements. Approval by the Board would not relieve the applicant from other governmental agency approvals because the applicant must meet the regulations that are the most restrictive. The applicant has contacted the LMCD after the City of Greenwood decision and he has stated that he would like the Board to consider the new multiple dock license application, pointing out that he would be working with the Greenwood to address their concerns. Harper recommended approval of the new multiple dock license application for the 2003 and 2004 season, subject to the submittal of a renewal without change application, with fees, for the 2004 season. He entertained questions or comments from the Board, Nybeck stated that he would be uncomfortable with the Board denying the new multiple dock license application because it met the objective criteria. He recommended that the Board should allow the City of Greenwood to resolve parking issues if the Board has concerns with that, However, the Board should discuss whether it would like to impose conditions to the approval if that was the direction the Board proceeded wiih. -1418- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting APril 14, 2004 Page 9 Seuntjens asked if the applicant had 'documented on the survey the amount of 929.4' shoreline at this site, Nybeck stated that this waS documented on the certified survey submitted and that there was approximately 407' of 929.4' shoreline, excluding the easement under Minnetonka Blvd. that would increase shoreline to 474' including the eaSement. For the proposal, the easement under Minnetonka Bivd. was not included in the shoreline calculations for the new multiple dock license application. SeUntjens asked for an update on the status of the firelane the City of Greenwood was resolving with the applicant. Mr. Hary Kreslins, 21965 Minnetonka Blvd., stated that there was not a firelane. However, the City of Greenwood would like to have access to the boats stored at the dock in case there is a fire. Halvorson asked how many of the BSU's would be leased by the applicant and how many BSU's would be used by the applicant. Nybeck stated that the applicant had communicated to him that six BSU's would be leased and that two BSU's would be used by the applicant himself. Babcock stated that whether the boats are leased or used by the applicant was not an issue if the site meets the 1:50' General Rule. Mr. Judd Mowry, 445 Lakeview Avenue, stated that he believed there might be some inappropr ate survey work done over the years at this site because of the increased amount of shoreline. He questioned whether the survey was actually certified because the surveyor did not sign the survey. Nybeck clarified that the large, to-scale survey was signed by the surveyor, However, he did not sign the survey included in the packet because it was not to-scale and this was common practice for the surveyor, Mowry circulated an aerial document of the immediate area and stated that he believed there was a significant difference betWeen this photo and the certified survey. When the bridge was originally constructed, there was a substantial amount of fill along Minnetonka Blvd. that the applicant is credited for 929.4' shoreline. He suggested that any approval should clarify that it was based on 407' of shoreline and what the consequences would be at a late date if the 320' of 929.4' shoreline previously approved for turns out not to be correct. LeFevere Stated that the certified survey submitted by the aPplicant addresses the amount of 929.4' shoreline at this site. If it is later determined to be inaccurate and that there was not enough shoreline to store the prop?seal number' of boats, the applicant would likely need to reduce the number of BSU's to meet the 1:50' General Rule. He pointed oUt that there was not an adverse claim by either the City of Greenwood or Hennepin County relating to this shoreline that was possibly established by fill. from the construction of the bridge. He reminded the Board that the'land b'etween the ordinary high water mark on Lake Minnetonka, 929.4', and the ordinary'low water, which has not been established, is privately -1419- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 owned. Page10 MOTION: Valdesuso moved, Nelson seconded to approve the Hary Kreslins new multiple dock license application for the 2003 and 2004 seasons, subject to the applicant submitting a renewal without change multiple dock license application with fees for the 2004 season. Ambrose questioned whether the motion should be made conditional on the applicant resolving the parking issues with the City of Greenwood. Babcock stated that the Board does not typically make an approval of the LMCD conditional on approval of the LMCD member city. When the jib crane at Wayzata Yacht Club (Site 2) was approved, the license had a condition on it that required the applicant to secure necessary permits from all governmental agencies. In this proposal, he recommended a friendly amendment be .added to the motion that a non- binding condition be added to the license that approval from the LMCD does not absolve the applicant from securing all necessary permits from other governmental agencies. Valdesuso and Nelson agreed to this friendly amendment. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Seuntjens requested that the neighbor docks to the northeast of the applicant docks might not be meeting side setback requirement and he recommended that staff check further into this. Canning stepped down from the Board during discussion of agenda item lB. Miles and Pamela Canning, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for denial of a dock length and adjusted dock use area variance application at 21100 Excelsior Blvd. Van Hercke introduced the agenda item by stating that a public hearing was not scheduled, that the applicants had withdrawn the variance application, and that discussion of it should remain at the Board level. However, if a Board member would like comments from the applicants or the public, she was not opposed to hearing those comments. She pointed out that comments have been received from the applicants and the Johnsons that were not included in the handout folders. If the Board would like to see these comments, copies of them to be made available. She asked for from background on this agenda item from LeFevere. LeFevere stated that Findings of Fact and Order for either approval or denial of an application are the Findings of the Board. TheY are a working document for the Board that can be approved as submitted or amended as the Board sees fit. He stated that the three options that were presented by Board member Foster were not included in the draft Findings because he believed it would be inappropriate for the Board to deny something that has not been applied for by the applicants. Because of this, the draft Findings clarify that the denial was for the variance application submitted by the applicants, and subsequently amended by the applicants fOr the length of the dock and the number of boats., Babcock stated that he believed it would be appropriate for the record to reflect that these draft Findings represent the majodty opinion of the Board on the Canning variance application, although there is not a - 1420- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page 11 need to take formal action on them because the applicants have withdrawn their variance application. Seuntjens concurred with the comments of Babcock. Van Hercke stated that the Johnsons have indicated that there were some directional discrepancies in the draft Findings that are inconsistent. She asked the Board whether they would like to review the comments received from the applicants and the Johnsons on the draft Findings. The Board discussed this and the consensus was to not review these comments. MOTION: Babcock moved, Seunjtens seconded to: 1) amend the draft Findings to reflect that the O'Gara site is the abutting southwest property and that the Johnson site is the abutting northeast property, and 2) note the draft Findings represent the majority opinion of the Board on the Canning variance application; however, no formal action should be taken on them because the Applicants have voluntarily withdrawn the variance application. VOTE: Ayes (11), Abstained (1, Valdesuso); motion carried. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 2. EWM/EXOTiCS TASK FORCE A. Review of proposed Action Plan for a more comprehensive zebra mussel program, Van Hercke asked for background on this agenda item from Nelson. Nelson stated that the power point presentation for a more comprehensive zebra mussel program on Lake Minnetonka consists of two parts. First, slides 1-15 describes the problem and the need fora solution. Second, slides 16-29 provide the basis for the solution. The power point presentation was made at the 4/9/04 EWU/Exotics Task Force Meeting: The MN DNR was further reviewing it and that comments would be forthcoming in the near future, He believed this project was moving forward and that he and Suerth would continue unless the Board communicates to stop or slow down. Raising of funds for this project should be done in conjunction with the "Save the Lake" fund and there would be a need to coordinate activities with Babcock on this, including updating th'e LMCD website to include "Save the Lake" activities. He believed that the most appropriate role on this project for the Lake Minnetonka Association would be for them to work with the MinnesOta Lakes Association on the limiting of transferring of boats from water ingested with zebra mussels that are not infested. He concluded by stating that he would like to solicit the input and assistance by moving forward with the "Major Initiatives and Action Plan" pages in the power presentation. He asked the Board if they had questions or comments. The Board discussed a number of aspects relating to this agenda item. Some of them included: 1) How to forward the materials to the 14 member cities and what to present to the respective city councils, 2) There is a need for staff to establish city council mee!ing schedules and deadlines for these meetings, 3) the number of copies for the poWer presentation that need to be provided to each LMCD member city, -1421 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ,, · Regular Board Meeting ~' April 14, 2004 Page 12 and 4) the need to establish a one page cover letter to be forwarded to each city council requesting a scheduled agenda item and a dearly defined desired outcome of each city council. C. Report from the 4./9/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force IVleeting. Van Hercke asked Suerth if there were any additional topics from the 4/9/04 EWM/Exotics TaSk Force Meeting that he would like to bring to the Boards attention. Suerth stated that the primary discussion item was the zebra mussel power point presentation. D. Additional Business, There was no additional business, 3. FINANOIAL A. Audit of vouchers (4/1/04 - 4/15/04). Knudsen reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Ambrose seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: MotiOn carried unanimously. B. Additional Business, There was no additional business. 4. LAKE USE & RECREATION . B. Additional Business. Scanlon stated that he would like the Board to discuss the fee structure for fees collected for intoxicating liquor, wine, and non-intoxicating liquor licenses issued by the LMCD for charter boats on Lake Minnetonka. The Board discussed this and the consensus was to include it in the discussion planned for the Board this summer on the possibility of increasing the number of intoxicating liquor licenses from 14, 5. ADMINISTRATION A, Update on vacant Administrative Secretary position, Van Hercke asked for background on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck that Karen Anderson resigned as the Administrative Secretary for the LMCD on 3/19/04. The position was advertised in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the three local newspapers, and the League of Minnesota Cities BUlletin in late February, with a deadline of March 15th. Over 60 applications were - 1422- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ' Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2004 Page13 received by this deadline, from which eight candidates were originally interviewed and three were given a second interview. All three candidates were of high quality; however, one candidate stood out. Ms. Emily Herman recently moved to Minnesota from Nebraska and he past work experience fits a lot of the knowledge, skills, and abilities that the LMCD was looking for. For the past 12 plus years, she worked for the City of Grand Island in a variety of secretarial positions. Prior to that, she worked an additional 10 years in a variety of secretarial positions at a hospital in Omaha. A reference check has been conducted with her most recent supervisor at the City of Grand Island and it was outstanding. The position has been offered to Ms. Herman and she has accepted it, with a target first day of Apd119th. Hiring by the LMCD is subject to Board approval. He recommended the Board enter into an employment agreement with Emily Herman as the Administrative Secretary for the LMCD with three conditions. These include: 1) an hourly rate of $15.00, 2) performance reviews to be conducted after six and 12 months, with possible compensation adjustments, and 3) benefits consistent with the recently adopted LMCD Personnel Policy. MOTION: Ambrose moved, Babcock seconded to enter into an employment agreement with Emily Herman as Administrative Secretary for the LMCD with the three conditions recommended by Nybeck. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 6. SAVE THE LAKE There was no discussion. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck made three comments. First, the official ice-out date was Tuesday, 4/6/04, at 3:45 a.m. Second, the lake level on Lake Minnetonka as of today was 928.19', with the dam closed. Third, he pointed out that he was in the process of getting the insurance renewal with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) and there was a need for the Board to approve a motion for a liability coverage waiver form. In the past, the LMCD has had $2,000,000 of liability coverage limits from the LMCIT and has not waived the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes Section 466.04. Babcock asked why the LMCD has had $2,000,000 coverage of liability coverage in the past rather than $1,000,000 and he suggested that this should be checked into. Seuntjens stated that he would like to better understand the cost differential between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000 of liability coverage. Nybeck stated that he was not prepared to address these questions at that time. He pointed out he would check on them and report back to the Board at the 4/28/04 Regular Meeting. He believed the Board could approve the liability coverage waiver form at that meeting. - 1423- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting April 14, 2OO4 Page14 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. 9. NEW BUSINESS Nelson updated the Board on a water runoff project planned in the City of Virginia that would likely cut off the navigation for canoes and kayaks between Lake Minnetonka and Lake Virginia. Babcock stated that the City of Excelsior has historically leased shoreline to the multiple dock facility currently known as Excel Marina: An unidentified source had communicated that this might have been done erroneously over the years and that they would likely be checking further into this. He suggested that the Board should consider how it would react if this was proven to be accurate. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:21 p.m, Katy Van Hercke, Vice Chair Jose Valdesuso, Secretary - 1424- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK - 1425-